Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010-12-21_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 21, 2010 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of December 7, 2010 II. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL cognition of Council Member Housh Fire Department Recognition —Volunteer Using AED At Braemar Arena * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of December 7, 2010 and Executive Session of December 13, 2010 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING:. Final Development Plan & Final Rezoning, YMCA — 7355 York Avenue, Resolution No. 2010 -129 and Ordinance No. 850 -35 (Favorable rollcoll vote of three Council Members present to approve) Agenda/Edina City Council December 21, 2010 Page 2 B. PUBLIC HEARING: Final Development Plan, Bruce Carlson /Centennial Lakes /Whole Food, - 7401 France Avenue, Resolution No. 2010 -130 (Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members present to approve) III. AWARD OF BID /CHANGE ORDERS * A. Eight Ford Crown Victorias — Police Department * B. Three Chevrolet Equinoxes — Police Department C. Council Chambers and Community Room Audio Systems Upgrades IV. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Resolution No. 2010 -123 Approving 2011 Operating Budgets & 2011 Tax Levy * B. Renew Community Health Services Agreement With Bloomington C. Renew Public Health Emergency Preparedness Agreement With Bloomington * D. Resolution No. 2010 -124 Setting Art Center Fees E. Second Reading: Ordinance No. 2010 -20 - Amending Code Section 185 Schedule A — Increasing Certain Fees (Second Reading: Favorable majority vote of all Council Members to pass.) F. Second Reading: Ordinance No. 2010 -17 - Regarding Non - Conforming Buildings And Uses And Additions To Or Replacement Of Homes With A First Floor Elevation Over One Foot Above The Existing Homes First Floor Elevation (Second Reading: Favorable majority vote of all Council Members to pass.) G. Second Reading: Ordinance No. 2010 -18 - Regarding Administration And Procedures Of The Zoning Ordinance And Establishing A PUD District (Second Reading: Favorable majority vote of all Council Members to pass.) H. First Reading: Ordinance No. 2010 -21 — Amending Code Section 1435 Concerning The Operation of All Terrain Vehicles, Motorcycles and Snowmobiles on Public Property (First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable majority vote of all Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass.) I. Presentation of Grandview District Report — Community Advisory Team Leader Kevin Staunton * J. Resolution No. 2010 -127 Setting Public Hearing for Improvement Projects: 1. BA -355 Golf Terrace Street Reconstruction (01/18/2011) 2. BA -334 Minnehaha Woods Street Reconstruction (01/18/2011) Also Receiving Feasibility Report 3. BA -370 Carson's Hill Street Reconstruction (01/18/2011) 4. BA -383 West 44th Street Reconstruction (02/01/2011) * K. Reappointments: Art Center Board, Construction Board of Appeals and Park Board * L. Resolution No. 2010 -125 Special Assessment Corrections * M. Traffic Safety Report of December 1, 2010 * N. Resolution No. 2010 -128 Correcting Resolution No. 2010 -95 For West 58th Street Bikeway 0. Resolution No. 2010 -126 Accepting Various Donations Agenda/Edina City Council December 21, 2010 Page 3 * P. Engineering Proposal For West 56`h Street Bridge Q. Revised Special Assessment Policy For Municipal State Aid Roadways V. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speaks on the some issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VI. FINANCE * A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per, Pre -List dated December 9, 2010, TOTAL $839,836.77; and per Pre -List dated December 16, 2010, TOTAL $929,740.25; and Credit Card Transactions 10/26/10 — 11/26/10, TOTAL, $4,391.99 VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence VIII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS IX. MANAGER'S COMMENTS X. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952 - 927 - 886172 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Tues Dec 21 Executive Session — Labor Negotiations 5:00 P.M. Tues Dec 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Fri Dec 24 CHRISTMAS HOLDIAY OBSERVED —City Hall Closed Fri Dec 31 NEW YEAR'S HOLIDAY OBSERVED —City Hall Closed Tues Jan 4 Work Session — Boards & Commissions Tues Jan 4 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Wed Jan 5 Interviews With Board & Commission Applicants 5:00 — 7:00 P.M Thur Jan 6 Interviews With Board & Commission Applicants 5:00 — 7:00 P.M Tues Jan 11 Interviews With Board & Commission Applicants 5:00 -7:00 P.M Mon Jan 17 DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Jan 18 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Jan 25 Study Session —to be determined 11:30 A.M. Tues Feb 1 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Feb 15 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Mon Feb 21 PRESIDENTS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Feb 22 Study Session — to be determined 7:00 A.M. Tues Mar 1 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Mar 15 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Mar 22 Study Session — to be determined 11:30 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS MAYORS CONFERENCE ROOM MAYORS CONFERENCE ROOM MAYORS CONFERENCE ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL DECEMBER 7, 2010 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Chair Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Bennett and seconded by Commissioner Swenson for approval of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 16, 2010, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Bennett and seconded by Commissioner Swenson approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for November 16, 2010. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 7:02 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Scott Neal, Executive Director /j ^jam ore kNi? .�0 • I�CORPOPA��'�� 1888 RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION WHEREAS, Scot Housh served the community on the Edina City Council and Housing and Redevelopment Authority for ten years, serving as a member from January 2001 to January 2011, and Mayor Pro Tern from 2005 through 2010; and WHEREAS, Scot Housh also served Edina as a member of the Park Board before his election to the City Council; and WHEREAS, Scot Housh was deeply committed to Edina's infrastructure, advocating for many neighborhood street reconstruction projects and public improvements that were approved and constructed during his term in office, including the construction of Adventure Peak at Edinborough Park, Edina City Hall, Fire Station No. 1 and the Public Works & Parks Maintenance Facility; and WHEREAS, Scot Housh has been a champion of the community during his tenure, leaving a legacy to all Edina citizens; and WHEREAS, Scot Housh has exemplified the City's mission of providing effective and valued public services, maintaining a sound public infrastructure, offering premiere public services and guiding the development and redevelopment of lands within the City, all in a mariner that sustains and improves the uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by residents and businesses; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that his fellow Edina City Council members, City staff and all Edina residents hereby express their thanks and appreciation to Scot Housh for his many years of dedication to the community as a member of the Edina City Council. Dated this 21St day of December 2010. Mayor ow e Cn • POPA�f'9 • 1888 FIRE DEPARTMENT RECOGNITION VOLUNTEER USING A.E.D,* AT BRAEMAR ARENA ❑ No packet data ❑ Oral presentation F-1 Information coming MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL December 7, 2010 7:03 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson approving the Council consent agenda. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES APPROVED — REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 16, 2010, AND WORK SESSION OF NOVEMBER 16, 2010 Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson approving the minutes of the regular meeting of November 16, 2010, and work session of November 16, 2010. Motion carried on rollcall vote —five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING HELD — 2011 OPERATING BUDGET AND 2011 LEVY Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Assistant Finance Director Roggeman reviewed the process undertaken with the budget and levy, noting the Council had approved and certified the 2011 maximum levy to the County with a 2.3 percent increase over the 2010 levy. He reviewed the 2009 and 2010 budget cuts that would be continued and those that would be restored in 2011. Mr. Roggeman advised that funding increases were for the Southwest LRT Steering Committee, Public Art, and the Itasca Project. Mr. Roggeman indicated that following budget adjustments, the total tax levy increase would be 1.15 percent, which was lower than property- specific notices mailed to taxpayers by the County. Finance Director Wallin commented on the $1 million cost savings that resulted from general obligation bond refinancing of the City Hall at 1.9 percent over the ten -year debt service. Mr. Roggeman presented a comparison of tax rates for Edina and a chart detailing the tax impact to residential homesteads. The Council asked questions of Mr. Roggeman. Mayor Hovland informed the audience of the Itasca Project's work on job retention, growth, and attraction strategies. Manager Neal confirmed that filling the Assistant City Manager position would be deferred for several months. Assistant to the City Manager Smith reported the arbitrator had contacted the Bureau of Mediations to request a five -day extension. Mr. Wallin addressed the service cuts that would result with a zero percent increase compared to a 1.15 percent increase. It was noted the Human Rights and Relations Commission had made the necessary budget revisions to fully fund the Edina Resource Center in 2011. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:20 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. It was indicated the Council would take formal action on the budget and levy at its December 21, 2010, meeting and accept written comments until that date. Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /December 7. 201 SERVICE OF COUNCIL MEMBER HOUSH ACKNOWLEDGED Mayor Hovland described the selfless service of Member Scott Housh, noting his term in office would end after the next meeting. The Members and audience responded with a round of applause. PUBLIC HEARING HELD — NINE MILE REGIONAL TRAIL CREEK -BASED ALIGNMENT APPROVED Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Mayor Hovland made an opening statement on issues related to the proposed Nine Mile Regional Trail, acknowledging there were opinions both in support of and against a creek -based alignment. He indicated the Council would respectfully listen to resident's testimony and act with integrity. Park and Recreation Director Keprios provided a presentation detailing the historical background and consideration of the Nine Mile Regional Trail. He advised of the benefits of the proposed walking /biking trail, which would be at the expense of the Three Rivers Park District. Mr. Keprios then presented the rationale used by the Parks Board to formulate its recommendation to approve a creek -based route for the proposed Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail subject to five restrictions and conditions. He presented the timeline for the trail project should it be approved by the Council, noting the City would have the opportunity for input during the construction document phase. Mr. Keprios thanked all residents and Commissions that provided input and Three Rivers Park District staff for their responsiveness and professionalism during this process. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:38 p.m. Public Testimony Aliya Johnson, 5844 St. Johns Avenue, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Ted McKlveen, 5261 Lochloy Drive, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Matt Rock, 4515 Casco Avenue, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Austyn Blair Neuman -Shaw, 4238 Grimes Avenue S., addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Craig Zachman, 6624 Limerick Drive, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail. Bob Schwartzbauer, 6107 Waterford Court, addressed the Council in opposition to a Segment 3 road -based trail. Kim Montgomery, 5300 Evanswood Lane, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Richard Johnson, 5700 Tucker Lane, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail. Gene Persha, 6917 Cornelia Drive, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Nancy Crain, 4952 Poppy Lane, addressed the Council in support of constructing a barrier in the western side of Segment 19. Mike Platterer, 4304 Branson Street, representing the Edina Energy and Environmental Commission, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Ken Kadash, 6110 Waterford Court, addressed the Council in opposition to a Segment 3 road -based trail. Harvey Johnson, 5505 Valley Lane, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail and submitted a survey of 750 residents also in opposition. Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /December 7. 2010 Andrew Heyer, 5717 Deville Drive, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Greg Frey, 6021 Killarney Lane S., addressed the Council in opposition to a trail. Jeff Werbalowsky, 6000 Fox Meadow Lane, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Robert Lubar, 6619 Londonderry Drive, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail and submitted a petition of 160 signatures in opposition. Tom La Force, 5901 Tingdale Avenue, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Paul Ratelle, 5521 Valley Lane, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail. Jessica Hulbert, 4601 Park Commons Drive, former resident, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Loren Vorlicky, 7060 Cahill, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail. Pat Corcoran, 4121 Monterey Avenue, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. James Hildebrand, 6808 Brook Drive, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail. Diane Fansler -Wald, 5709 West 66`h Street, addressed the Council in support of an off -road trail and opposition to road based trail in Segment 7. Brad Scaeppi, 4600 Bruce Avenue, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. David Thompson, 5517 Valley Lane, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail. Dan Atkins, 6812 Chapel Lane, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Jan Moe, 6519 Creek Drive, addressed the Council regarding trail adjacent property values. Mary Lilja, 5809 McGuire Road, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Mary Ross, 312 Harrison, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail. Katherine Bass, 6917 Gleason Road, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Bjorn Thompson, 5517 Valley Lane, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail. Lori Richman, 5828 Ewing Avenue S., addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Tami Thompson, 5517 Valley Lane, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail. Vasanti Mudkanna, 5717 Deville Drive, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Fritz Corrigan, 6509 Biscayne Boulevard, addressed the Council in opposition to a trail. Craig Jarvinen, 4351 Parkview Lane, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /December 7. 2010 James Moe, 6519 Creek Drive, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail. Carl Follstad, 5709 Bernard Place, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Pam Johnson, 5505 Valley Lane, addressed the Council in opposition to the lack of process. Peter Kelley, 4020 Inglewood Avenue, representing the Bike Edina Task Force, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Dan Peterson, 6520 Creek Drive, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail. Raymond O'Connell, 4612 Valley View Road, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Marilyn Reilly, 6600 Londonderry Drive, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail. Pat Fletcher, 5137 Halifax Avenue, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. James Peterson, 6520 Creek Drive, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail. Janey Westin, 6136 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Laurie Chapman, 6420 Aspen Road, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail. Carl Gulbronson, 7200 York Avenue, addressed the Council in support of creek based trail. David Gepner, 6845 Penn Avenue, Richfield resident, addressed the Council in support of a regional trail. Pat Teynor, 5525 Malibou Drive, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail. Diane Plunkett- Latham, 7013 Comanche Court, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Alice Hulbert, 7221 Tara Road, addressed the Council in support of a creek -based trail. Judith Martin, 5232 West 70th Street, addressed the Council in opposition to a creek -based trail. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council asked Three Rivers Park District representatives to address questions raised during public testimony. Jonathan Warning, Three Rivers Park District, described their public safety division and patrols conducted on an irregular schedule. The trails would close November 15 through March 31 unless the City wanted the trails to remain open and took responsibility for maintenance. Cris Gears, Three Rivers Park District Superintendent, clarified the Council was being asked to select a trail route with the understanding that construction would be several years into the future. If approved, the District would work closely with the City in creating the construction plans and would obtain all funding from various agencies including the District's tax revenues by issuing bonds. He advised that Legacy Funds were available for trails of regional or State significance. He assured the Council that if approved there would be no special assessment against Edina properties and the District would not enter into an agreement binding the City to construction of the trail or to grant easements until the final alignment was agreed to and all funding was in place. Mr. Gears advised that the Park District had no intention to require parking construction and any Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /December 7. 2010 parking solution would be done in full cooperation with the city. Mr. Vlaming indicated the next grant funding cycle would be March through June, 2011, and if successful in obtaining grants, construction would be in 2015 and 2016. Boe Carlson, Three Rivers Park District, addressed homes that were in close proximity to the trail and assured the Council the District would work closely with the City and residents, on a one -on -one basis, to determine an acceptable proximity threshold and how the trail would be implemented to minimize impact through vegetation and physical materials. He explained that some cities permit a "patchwork" solution while others preferred a uniform aesthetic. Should a dispute over buffering arise, the Park District would work with the property owner to resolve the issue and had, in some cases, removed fences when the property owners felt they were no longer necessary. The Council asked whether the Park District would provide screening if the house was located 150 feet from the trail. Mr. Carlson stated the Park District would work closely with the City to identify those "pinch points," determine the threshold, and look at all considerations. In addition, neighborhood design meetings would be scheduled during the development process to identify those issues at the front end so such locations were known prior to the final design stage. With regard to public safety, Mr. Carlson indicated the Park District had over 100 miles of regional trail through Hennepin County that experienced two million annual visitors. Predominantly, conflicts were user related as , h".l lists net obeying a step s; ^ int^ a walk^F versus public safety instances. It was noted that Park District public safety officers patrol the trail system and the District was on the Hennepin County 911 system so it received calls at the same time and responded immediately. The Council asked whether an agreement had been reached, on a preliminary basis, regarding construction of a sound protective fence along the north bound ramp to TH100. Mr. Vlaming stated the sound barrier wall had been discussed for over two years and the City could require a reasonable sound wall or fence barrier as a condition in the Cooperative Trail Agreement. However, it would be preferable if all neighbors along that stretch were in agreement and it appears that was already the case. Mr. Vlaming addressed the boardwalk design, describing it to be 12 feet wide and of varied height determined by a technical team but was generally three feet above flowing water, similar in appearance to Luce Line boardwalks. The Park District was still considering surfacing options and had hired a sound engineer to gather data on the level of sound generated. The Park District would remove debris if on the boardwalk. It was noted that residents had cleaned debris after high water events. Mr. Gears reaffirmed that the Three Rivers Park District would not construct any regional trail that does not meet the City's needs and approval. The consideration tonight was approval of a trail corridor and concerns expressed would be addressed during the design process. Mr. Vlaming stated the Park District had provided a fact sheet regarding how trails influence property values that cited analysis of a study prepared for Hennepin County Public Works involving four regional trails. It was generally found there was a bonus to the property that increased as the home neared the trail. Ciara Schlichting, Planner with Bonestroo, addressed the Council's questions regarding the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). She explained Bonestroo had conducted an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) which determined there were environmental effects but none significant enough to warrant the preparation of an EIS. The EAW was voluntary and found existing corridor conditions had been significantly impacted over time by residential construction, storm water practices, lawn chemicals and removal of natural vegetation. Issues determined would be subject to ongoing regulatory authority and dealt with during the design process. The EAW and record of decision also recognized several mitigation strategies to minimize impact on heritage mature trees. Ms. Schlichting advised the Three Rivers Park District had a history of mitigating and replacing trees in close proximity or where a larger tree was removed. Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /December 7. 201 The Council questioned the issue of liability should an injury occur on the trail. Attorney Knutson explained it was a nonissue if there was no negligence and, in any event, the trail would be owned by Three Rivers Park District, not the City. With regard to the comment about "form over function" and consideration of other segments deemed to have merit, Mr. Keprios explained that the consulting firms had identified several different routes but the route under consideration was felt to be the most beneficial and likely -to -be -used alignment. He advised that should the City want to consider alternate routes, it would be at the City's expense. Mr. Keprios noted the Three Rivers Park District had also studied the Canadian Pacific rail line for over a year but would need the cooperation of Canadian Pacific Railway to make that happen and so it was on the longer -term drawing board. Kevin Bigalke, Nine Mile Watershed District Administrator, explained how the Nine Mile Creek restoration project would interface and coordinate with simultaneous construction activities of the proposed trail to minimize disturbance. Mr. Bigalke stated that cost savings were possible should the same contractor be used for some of both restoration and trail work. It was noted the Creek restoration project would result in a more efficient system to move flood waters and create an ecologically sound amenity for the City, residents, and wildlife. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to approve a creek -based route for the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail with the following restrictions and conditions: 1. Keep the trail on the south side of Walnut Ridge Park. 2. That Three Rivers Park District makes all reasonable efforts in the engineering /design phase to minimize boardwalk noise and height. 3. That Three Rivers Park District offers to provide homeowners with principle residences adjacent to the proposed regional trail edge the option to have buffers where reasonable and at Three River's expense. Buffer options are fencing or vegetative screening (trees, shrubs). 4. That Three Rivers Park District take reasonable steps to minimize the amount of boardwalks in the complex balancing act that also attempts to minimize the impact on the environment (wetlands, water quality, and vegetation). S. Place a time limit deadline on the easements offered to Three Rivers Park District to complete the project within a reasonable time frame. A reasonable time limit should be negotiated with Three Rivers Park District and that language should be included in the easement agreement. 6. That the final design shall minimize property impacts and be subject to Council approval. 7. That a reasonable sound wall be constructed for Segment 19 that was satisfactory to the City. The Council discussed that this project would involve phased construction and funding cycles so more information was needed to determine a reasonable timeframe when easements should be returned to the City if the trail was not constructed. The Council agreed that the intention was clear in the self imposed condition by the Park District that a reasonable time limit would be negotiated and that language would be included in the easement agreement. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING HELD — 2011 LIQUOR LICENSE FEES Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. City Clerk Mangen explained Minnesota Statutes require the City to hold a public hearing after 30 -day notice to license holders of its intention to raise liquor license fees. She presented the 2011 liquor license fees, noting that the 3.2 Beer on and off sale and temporary 3.2 beer licenses were the only fees proposed to be increased. Ms. Mangen advised that licensed beverage caterer licenses were granted by the State of Minnesota Public Safety Department and not individual cities. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 10:44 p.m. Page 6 Minutes /Edina City Council /December 7. 2010 Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *AWARD OF BID — 2011 ONE TON F450 FORD TRUCK — PARK MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson awarding the bid for 2011 one -ton F450 Ford truck, Park Maintenance Department, to the recommended low bidder, Midway Ford Fleet Sales at $35,175.38. Motion carried on rollcall vote —five ayes. *AWARD OF BID — ONE FIRE ENGINE /PUMPER — GENERAL SAFETY FIRE APPARATUS (ROSENBAUER) Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson awarding the bid for one fire engine /pumper, for the Edina Fire Department, to the recommended low bidder, General Safety Fire Apparatus (Rosenbauer) $392,003.00 Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *AWARD OF BID — THREE SPORT UTILITY SUPPORT VEHICLES POLAR CHEVROLET — FIRE DEPARTMENT Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson awarding the bid for three sport utility support vehicles for the Fire Department to the recommended low bidder, Polar Chevrolet at $102,718.50. Motion carried on rollcall vote —five ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -116 ADOPTED — ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -116 accepting various donations. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -117 ADOPTED — FLEXIBLE BENEFIT PLAN APPROVED Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to adopt Resolution No. 2010 -117, amending the City of Edina Flexible Benefit Plan. Motion carried on rollcall vote —five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -118 ADOPTED — HEALTH REIMBURSEMENT ARRANGEMENT APPROVED Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to adopt Resolution No. 2010 -118, amending the City of Edina health reimbursement arrangement. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -119 ADOPTED — YEAR 2011 PARK AND RECREATION FEES AND CHARGES APPROVED Mr. Wallin presented the 2011 fees and charges for Park and Recreation fees as recommended by the Park Board. The Council noted the following corrections: page 3, separately categorize nonresident fees; page 7, Art Center fees, third line, should indicate $168 rather than $158. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -119, setting 2011 Park and Recreation fees, with corrections as stated. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 7 Minutes /Edina City Council /December 7. 2010 RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -120 ADOPTED - YEAR 2011 AMBULANCE FEES APPROVED Fire Chief Scheerer presented the 2011 ambulance fees reflecting modest increases and a new fee for vehicle decontamination. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -120, setting ambulance fees for 2011. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -121 ADOPTED - YEAR 2011 MISCELLANEOUS FEES APPROVED Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -121, setting miscellaneous fees for 2011. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -20 GRANTED FIRST READING — AMENDING CODE SECTION 185 SCHEDULE A — INCREASING CERTAIN FEES Mr. Wallin advised that the City of Minneapolis had conducted a rate study and may consider an increase of five percent, which had been incorporated into the Morningside rate. It was expected the City of Minneapolis would approve its rate increase prior to second reading of this ordinance. Member Brindle made a motion to grant First Reading of Ordinance No. 2010 -20, amending Code Section 185, Schedule A, increasing certain fees, correcting page 2, section 1230.07, to indicate "sidewalk cart permit, and page 3, end of line, to change the word " reduting" to "reducing." Member Housh seconded the motion Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -122 ADOPTED — EXECUTION OF DWI ENFORCEMENT GRANT PROGRAM AUTHORIZED Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to adopt Resolution No. 2010 -122, authorizing execution of agreement DWI Enforcement Grant Program. Motion carried on rollcall vote —five ayes. *HEARING DATE SET (DECEMBER 21. 2010) FOR PLANNING ITEMS Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson setting public hearing date of December 21, 2010 for planning items: 1. Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning, YMCA, 7355 York Avenue; and, 2. Final Development Plan for Bruce Carlson, Centennial Lakes, Whole Food, 7401 France Avenue. Motion carried on rollcall vote —five ayes. 2011 VOLUNTEER RECOGNITION RECEPTION SCHEDULED Following discussion of available dates, Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to schedule the 2011 Volunteer Recognition Reception at Edinborough Park at 5:00 p.m. on April 28, 2011. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. 2011 ANNUAL BOARD AND COMMISSION MEETING SCHEDULED Following discussion of available dates, Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to schedule the 2011 Annual Board And Commission Meeting at 5:00 p.m. on March 21, 2010. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS POSTPONED TO DECEMBER 21, 2010 Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to postpone consideration of Zoning Ordinance amendments to December 21, 2010, for: 1. Revised draft of Ordinance No. 2010 -17 regarding non - conforming buildings and uses and additions to or replacement of homes with a first floor elevation over one foot above the existing Page 8 Minutes /Edina City Council /December 7. 2010 home's first floor elevation; and, 2. Revised draft of Ordinance No. 2010 -18 regarding administration and procedures of the Zoning Ordinance and establishing a PUD District. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *ONE -YEAR EXTENSION OF FINAL PLAN WITH VARIANCE GRANTED — EDINA REALTY BUILDING, 3930 WEST 49% STREET Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson approving an extension of the Final Plan with variance for Edina Realty Building, 3930 West 49% Street, for one year. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *EDINA MEMBERSHIP IN HGAC PURCHASING CONSORTIUM AUTHORIZED Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson authorizing membership in HGAC purchasing consortium. Motion carried on rollcall vote —five ayes. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated November 18, 2010, and consisting of 28 pages: General Fund $184,222.07; Communications Fund $8,144.54; Working Capital Fund $54,460.97; Art Center Fund $4,132.65; Golf Dome Fund $64.13; Aquatic Center Fund $611:83; Golf Course Fund $24,467.54; Ice Arena Fund $383,275.20; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $6,056.10; Liquor Fund $212,436.04; Utility Fund $27,045.34; Storm Sewer Fund $311.35; Recycling Fund $37,683.00; PSTF Agency Fund $327.91; TOTAL $943.238.67 and for approval of payment of claims dated November 25, 2010, and consisting of 53 pages: General Fund $165,477.89; Communications Fund $1,003.34; City Hall debt Service $750.00; Working Capital Fund $99,397.12; Equipment Replacement Fund $3,628.41; Art Center Fund $20,715.46; Golf Dome Fund $2,562.27; Aquatic Center Fund $842.69; Golf Course Fund $10,125.51; Ice Arena Fund $170.46; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $19,887.58; Liquor Fund $228,122.28; Utility Fund $234,577.47; Storm Sewer Fund $3,774.88; PSTF Agency Fund $4,088.94; TOTAL $795.124.30; and, for approval of payment of claims dated December 2, 2010, and consisting of 22 pages: General Fund $149,169.32; Communications Fund $1,027.81; PIR Debt Service Fund $2,390.00; Working Capital Fund $111,711.54; Equipment Replacement Fund $29,816.93; Construction Fund $23,384.07; Art Center Fund $1,243.41; Golf Dome Fund $1,656.35; Golf Course Fund $14,419.22; Ice Arena Fund $13,443.25; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $11,032.37; Liquor Fund $134,863.13; Utility Fund $53,036.02; Storm Sewer Fund $25,548.14; PSTF Agency Fund $4,694.39; Payroll Fund $182,773.89; TOTAL $760.209.94; Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *PETITION REQUESTING FENCE ALONG WEST SIDE OF FRANCE AVENUE OVER MINNEHAHA CREEK RECEIVED Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson receiving and referring petition requesting fence along west side of France Avenue over Minnehaha Creek to the Engineering Department for processing. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 11:20 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, December 21, 2010. James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 9 MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL DECEMBER 13, 2010 5:00 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Council Member Elect Sprague joined the City Council for the session. Staff attending the meeting included: Scott Neal, City Manager; Ceil Smith, Assistant to the City Manager; Jeff Long, Police Chief, John Wallin, Finance Director; Eric Roggeman, Assistant Finance Director; Roger Knutson, City Attorney; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Member Swenson made a motion seconded by Member Bennett to close the council meeting to allow the Council to discuss the implications of the received arbitrator's decision on labor negotiations: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson and Mayor Hovland Motion carried. Manager Neal briefed the Council on the decision of the arbitrator with the Police Teamsters union. Attorney Knutson reviewed the legal options available to the City Council The Council and staff reviewed the financial implications of decision, with the resultant possible operational implications. They reviewed their future collective bargaining options. The Council gave staff direction on how to proceed with the negotiations. Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, December 13, 2010 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor 841 e MAYOR AND COUNCIL �\ From: Cary Teague ® Action Planning Director ❑ Discussion Information Date: December 21, 2010 Subject: Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning, YMCA — 7355 York Avenue, Resolution No. 2010 -129 and Ordinance No. 850 -35. Deadline February 15, 2011 for a City REPORURECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. II.A. From: Cary Teague ® Action Planning Director ❑ Discussion Information Date: December 21, 2010 Subject: Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning, YMCA — 7355 York Avenue, Resolution No. 2010 -129 and Ordinance No. 850 -35. Deadline February 15, 2011 for a City Decision: ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution and ordinance approving the Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning from R -1, Single- Dwelling Unit District to POD -1, Planned Office District, per the recommendation of the Planning Commission. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The YMCA is requesting a Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning to build a 15,300 square foot addition to the existing YMCA at 7355 York Avenue. The proposed expansion would add a new leisure pool, fitness center and studio. Planning Commission Recommendation: On December V 2010, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning subject to the findings and conditions set forth in the staff report dated December 1, 2010. The Planning Commission also recommended a revision to the site plan to ensure compliance with required parking stall depths, and that the new sidewalk through the parking lot must be installed with a standard curb. The applicant has revised the plan to demonstrate code compliance. (See attached plan date stamped December 6, 2010.) ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2010 -129 • Ordinance 850 -35 • Revised Site Plan • Planning Commission Staff Report, December 1, 2010 • Minutes from the December 1, 2010 Edina Planning Commission meeting. o Proposed Plans RESOLUTION NO. 2010-129 RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FINAL REZONING FOR THE YMCA SITE AT 7355 YORK AVENUE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: City Of Edina Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 CresaPartners on behalf of the YMCA are requesting to build an addition to the existing YMCA at 7355 York Avenue. The proposed facility expansion would add 15,300 square feet to the existing YMCA. A new 5,300 square foot leisure pool, and a 9,000 square foot fitness center and studio would be added. Total size of the new YMCA would be 82,100 square feet. 1.02 The property is currently zoned R -1, low- density residential, therefore, the existing use is non- conforming; a health club is not a permitted use in the R -1 District. Therefore, the applicant is also requesting a rezoning to Planned Office District (POD) to make the use conforming. A health club is a permitted use within a POD. 1.03 On August 19, 2010, the Transportation Commission recommended approval of the traffic study subject to conditions. 1.04 On September 29, 2010 the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning. Vote: 7 Ayes and 1 Nay. 1.05 On December 1, 2010 the Planning commission unanimously recommended approval of the Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning. Section 2. FINDINGS Approval is subject to the following findings: The rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan which designates the site for Mixed Use. 2. The City would benefit from a new and improved YMCA facility. The site would continue with a use that has been there since the early 1970's. 3. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. 4. The proposed plans meet all minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements. 5. The Final Development Plan is consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plan. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2010-129 Page Two Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning for the YMCA at 7355 York Avenue. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped October 29, 2010 and December 6, 2010 • Grading plan date stamped October 29, 2010. • Landscaping plan date stamped October 29, 2010. • Building elevations date stamped October 29, 2010. • Building materials board including colors as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meetings. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash . deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 6. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated November 19, 2010. 7. The new sidewalk through the parking lot must be installed with a standard curb, subject to review and approval of the city engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on , 2010. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor RESOLUTION NO. 2010-129 Page Two STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2010 City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 850-35 AN ORDINANCE REZONING 7355 YORK AVENUE FROM R -1, SINGLE DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT TO POD -1, PLANNED OFFICE DISTRICT The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. The subject property is hereby rezoned from R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to POD - 1, Planned Office District based.on the following findings: 1. The rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan which designates the site for Mixed Use. 2. The City would benefit from a new and improved YMCA facility. The site would continue with a use that has been there since the early 1970's. 3. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. 4. The proposed plans meet all minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements. Section 2. The subject property is legally described as follows: Lot 1, Block 4, YORKTOWN, Hennepin County Minnesota. Section 3. The official zoning map of the City of Edina referred to and described in Section 850.06 of the Edina City Code shall not be republished to show the aforesaid rezoning, but the zoning map on file in the City Clerk's office shall be appropriately marked for the purpose of indicating the rezoning provided for in this ordinance. Section 4. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publishing in the Edina Sun Current on Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2010 City Clerk MEETING MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, December 1, 2010 Edina City Hall Council Chambers 4801 50th Street West MEMBERS PRESENT: Fischer, Risser, Scherer, Staunton, Schroeder, Grabiel, Forrest, Rock, Stefanik MEMBERS ABSENT: Carpenter, Brown STAFF PRESENT: Cary Teague and Jackie Hoogenakker I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: The minutes of the October 27, 2010, meeting were filed with an addition from Commissioner Grabiel. II. NEW BUSINESS: Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission the YMCA is requesting a rezoning for the purpose of building an addition to the existing YMCA at 7355 York Avenue. The proposed facility expansion would add 15,300 square feet. A new 5,300 square foot leisure pool, and a 9,000 square foot fitness center and studio would be added. Total size of the new YMCA would be 82,100 square feet. The applicant has already received the following approvals from the City: 1. A Preliminary Rezoning from R -1, Single- Dwelling Unit District to POD -1, Planned Office District -1. 2. A Preliminary Development Plan. The applicant is now requesting the following: 1. Final Development Plan. 2. Final Rezoning. The applicant has revised the approved preliminary plans in an attempt to address concerns raised by the Planning Commission and City Council during the preliminary approval process. The plan revisions include the following: • Pedestrian connection provided through the parking lot from York Avenue to the front entrance. • Drive circulation in the east parking lot has been reversed. • Parking lot redesigned and meets minimum parking requirements. • Landscape islands added in the parking lot. • Redesign of the north driveway entrance /exit. • A pick -up /drop -off area has been added to the front of the building for cars and buses. • Bike rack area has been added. • Handicap parking stalls added. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Final Rezoning from R -1, Single- Dwelling Unit District to POD, Planned Office Development District -1 (POD -1), and Final Development Plan based on the following findings: 1. The rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan which designates•the site for Mixed Use. 2. The City would benefit from a new and improved YMCA facility. The site would continue with a use that has been there since the early 1970's. 3. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. 4. The proposed plans meet all minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements. 5. The Final Development Plan is consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plan. Approval is also subject to the following Conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed -and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped October 29, 2010. • Grading plan date stamped October 29, 2010. • Landscaping plan date stamped October 29, 2010. • Building elevations date stamped October 29, 2010. • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meetings. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 2 5. Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 6. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated November 19, 2010. Appearing for the Applicant: Steve Dorgan, Cresa Partners, Craig Fenton Applicant Presentation: Mr. Dorgan addressed the Commission and introduced the development team. Continuing, Dorgan said the YMCA is very excited about this project and if all approvals are received the project will "go to bid" sometime in January with construction commencing in the spring of 2011. Dorgan said the development team worked closely with City staff to implement the changes suggested by both staff the Commission and City Council. With graphics Dorgan pointed out the revisions to the previous plan that include; pedestrian connection provided through the parking lot from York Avenue to the front entrance, drive circulation in the east parking lot has been reversed, parking lot was redesigned and meets minimum parking requirements, landscape islands added in the parking lot, redesign of the north driveway entrance /exit, a pickup /drop -off area has been added to the front of the building for cars and buses, a bike rack area was added and handicapped parking stalls were added. Concluding, Mr. Dorgan said the building materials will complement the existing facility and will consist of brick, precast wall panels, champagne trim accent panels and clear glass. The extended YMCA logo was not included because-it did not meet the sign code. Discussion /Questions Commissioner Forrest asked if any change was made to the east entrance. Mr. Dorgan responded that the east entrance remains the same; the main entrance continues to be on the west side of the building. Commissioner Risser commented an earlier concern that was expressed was with the bus stop /sidewalk adding in her opinion the revision looks much better. The discussion ensued focusing on the circulation of the site and the pedestrian connection from York Avenue to the building. Focus was on the pedestrian walkway and its adjacent parking stalls. The issue was raised if a one inch curb is adequate protection along the walkway. Commissioners felt that the proposed pedestrian walkway needs to be more clearly defined and there was concern that if the proposed walkway was permitted as submitted a negative precedent for pedestrian connections would be established. Commissioners felt that all pedestrian connections should be clearly defined and demarked and that a one inch curb may not be the proper way to do it. It was acknowledged by the Commission that the applicant responded to their suggestion of a pedestrian connection to York Avenue; however, the result wasn't exactly what they envisioned. Continuing, it was reiterated that more than a one inch curb is needed to completely stop a vehicle and to demark a pedestrian walkway. A walkway needs to be safe and allow an overhang. Commissioner Schroeder suggested that the parking stalls along one side of the pedestrian walkway could be eliminated. He acknowledged that 11 parking stalls would be lost; but the pedestrian walkway would not be compromised. It was also pointed out if compact parking stalls are proposed as accessible that may become an issue because compact spaces may not be allowed as accessible. It was noted that the handicap stalls could be relocated. It was suggested that a compromise could be made by actually flip flopping only the parking stalls one aisle north. The parking stalls to the north are standard and if they are flip flopped with the compact spaces along the proposed pedestrian walkway with full curb any issue would be resolved. Motion: Commissioner Staunton moved to recommend Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning approval based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions to include the further recommendation that proposed pedestrian walkway include a curb and that the depth/width of the parking stalls along the walkway be moved one aisle to the north and the north stalls be moved one aisle south (flip - flopped). Commissioner Forrest seconded the motion. Commissioner Forrest said she would withdraw her motion if the motion included rezoning. Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion. Commissioner Forrest states she feels strongly that if the Commission proceeds with the rezoning the Comprehensive Plan needs to be amended, pointing out in the MDD zoning districts (MDD -5 specifically) certain uses are permitted, need a Conditional Use or not permitted. Chair Fischer said he understands the issue; however, he thought it was resolved at preliminary. Forrest agreed it was discussed at preliminary; however, the proposed use must be compliant with the Comprehensive Plan and in her opinion the use doesn't comply. Commissioner Staunton clarified that the Comprheisve Plan was amended to guide this area as mixed use, adding it isn't specific to MDD -5, etc. He pointed out a POD zoning is permitted in Mixed Use and MDD -5 is one type of mixed use. Forrest said she just wants to make sure that all bases are covered and that this use wouldn't be required to have a Conditional Use permit. Continuing, Forrest said she is not against the project, or the POD zoning, but wants the minutes to reflect that the Council should review the language in the Comprehensive Plan and zoning ordinance and if a revision to the Comprehensive Plan is required for this project that the City Council takes the necessary steps. 4 The discussion ensued noting that the Comprehsive Plans "Mixed Use" designation for this area is a guide that permits a number of different uses and designations and that the Commission and Council need to ensure that a balance of uses continues within this area. It was noted that Commissioner Staunton's motion included the rezoning. Ayes; Risser, Scherer, Staunton, Schroeder, Grabiel, Forrest, Fischer. Motion carried. 5 QD F3CMHwhg yy---- nE ELE ELE ELE - -- ELE EtE - - -- ELE - EL• - ELE ELE CLj• ELE • \ L .•E. ELE E ^ :E - - -- _ -- -- -- -- - - �- - -- — -- - - -- -- _ - -- — - — .-- — — - — — — — I -- --- - - --tI- --- - - - - - - -- — \\\- -- - - -- — — — I— — I — —I - - - ------ - - - - -- — — — — — II - -I - -' -- i --- - - - - -- L _ — \ I \ s� ••866 I \\ \ \ \\ 18• -il 1/8' 24' -0' I • • ' 7 /!Y -0, -0 8 ' 8 -0 -0 ro \ - �- 's,• (J� 2 — Co — o nro s c ftc.E 'gwBR • ,�r�crc IT�.c.T� . °�T�i +— 491N�.1� o� e En rJ � �y PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague December 1, 2010 2008 - 012.10 Director of Planning INFORMATION /BACKGROUND Project Description The YMCA is requesting a rezoning for the purpose of building an addition to the existing YMCA at 7355 York Avenue. The proposed facility expansion would add 15,300 square feet. A new 5,300 square foot leisure pool, and a 9,000 square foot fitness center and studio would be added. Total size of the new YMCA would be 82,100 square feet. The property is currently zoned R -1, low- density residential, therefore, the existing use is non - conforming; a health club is not a permitted use in the R -1 District. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a rezoning to Planned Office District (POD) to make the use conforming. (See location, applicant narrative and plans on pages Al —A21.) A health club is a permitted use within a POD. In 2009 the City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan amendment from Low - Density Residential to Mixed Use; Preliminary Development Plan, and Preliminary Rezoning to tear down and rebuild a new YMCA with a two -level parking ramp, and a four -story, 130 unit, 136,000 square foot apartment building. The YMCA has abandoned those plans, and is now proposing an addition to the existing YMCA facility. (See previously approved preliminary plan on page Al 3.) The applicant has already received the following approvals from the City: 1. A Preliminary Rezoning from R -1, Single- Dwelling Unit District to POD -1, Planned Office District -1. 2. A Preliminary Development Plan. (See pages Al 3.) (See Planning Commission & City Council minutes on pages A21a— A21g.) The applicant is now requesting the.following: 1. Final Development Plan. 2. Final Rezoning. The applicant has revised the approved preliminary plans in an attempt to address concerns raised by the Planning Commission and City Council during the preliminary approval process. (See pages A6 —A7, of the applicant's narrative regarding the revisions made.) The plan revisions include the following: • Pedestrian connection provided through the parking lot from York Avenue to the front entrance. • Drive circulation in the east parking lot has been reversed. • Parking lot redesigned and meets minimum parking requirements. • Landscape islands added in the parking lot. • Redesign of the north driveway entrance /exit. • A pick -up /drop -off area has been added to the front of the building for cars and buses. • Bike rack area has been added. • Handicap parking stalls added. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Yorktown Park and Fire Station; zoned R -1 Single- Dwelling Unit District and guided park. Easterly: Single- family homes in the City of Richfield. Southerly: Yorkdale Townhomes and single - family homes; zoned and guided low & medium density housing. Westerly: 7500 York Senior Housing; zoned and guided high density housing. Existing Site Features The subject property is 5.94 acres in size and contains a 66,800 square foot YMCA facility. (See page A3 —A5.) Planning Guide Plan designation: Mixed Use Zoning: R -1, Single- Dwelling District 2 Final Development Plan Review Section 850.04.Subd. 2.5, requires the City Council to make the following findings for approval of a Final Development Plan: a) is consistent with the Comprehensive. Plan; The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for Mixed Use. A YMCA would be a permitted within the POD -1 zoning district, which this property is designated. Therefore, the proposed uses would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. b) is consistent with the Preliminary Development Plan as approved and modified by the Council and contains the Council imposed conditions to the extent the conditions can be complied with by the Final Development Plan; The proposed Final Development Plans are consistent with Preliminary Development Plan including the modifications required by the Transportation Commission, Planning Commission and City Council. c) will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract, The addition meets all minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements of the POD zoning district. The addition is also consistent with the existing YMCA on the site, and would not alter the character of the neighborhood. d) will not result in an overly- intensive land use; Parking requirements for the proposed addition can be accommodated on site. Additionally, a traffic study, done by Spack Consulting, concluded that the addition can be supported by the adjacent roadways. Therefore, the addition would not result in an overly intensive land use. e) will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards; Yes. Spack Consulting conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed addition. (See traffic study and staff report on pages A32 —A72.) The Edina Transportation Commission met on November 18, 2010, and recommended approval of the traffic study. (See the minutes on pages A23— A26. ) 3 t) conforms to the provisions of this Section and other applicable provisions of the Code; and As demonstrated in the compliance table on page 6, the proposal conforms to all Zoning Ordinance requirements. g) provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features. Staff believes the proposal would meet this criterion. Parking Health clubs are required 6 parking spaces per court for handball, racquetball and tennis courts, and one space per 200 square feet of gross floor area for all other uses. There are two racquetball courts and 63,920 square feet of other uses proposed within the YMCA. Other uses include the pools, gymnasiums, exercise areas, office space, meeting rooms, and kid's areas. Therefore, 332 parking spaces are required on the site. The plan shows there would be a total of 333 parking stalls (See pages Al4 —A15.) Access /Circulation Access to the site would remain through the existing two drive entrances off York Avenue. Circulation would remain generally the same as exists today with parking areas on the east and west side of the building. The main building entrance to the YMCA would face York Avenue. The applicant revised the access and circulation per the recommendations of the Transportation Commission, Planning Commission and city engineer during the Preliminary Plan review. (See plans on pages A14 —A16.) An east/west pedestrian walkway was added from York Avenue to the building. The north entrance was reconfigured, and that the drive circulation in the east parking lot reversed. Drive aisle width, and parking stall dimensions meet minimum city standards. Grading /Drainage /Utilities There are no significant changes to the existing'grading, drainage or utilities on the site. The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and condition_ s outlined on the attached page A22. 4 Landscaping The applicant is proposing additional landscaping around the building and perimeter of the site. (See page A16.) Based on the perimeter of the site, 51 overstory trees are required. The applicant is proposing 52 existing and new overstory trees to meet the City Code requirement. A full compliment of understory trees and shrubs are proposed around the building, and within the parking islands. Building /Building Material The addition would be designed to fit in, or match with the existing building. The new building would be made of brick, metal and concrete panels. Windows would be added to the front of the building. (See renderings and building elevations on page A10 —A11.) The proposed building materials are considered acceptable by the Zoning Ordinance which requires the following: "All exterior wall finishes on any building shall be one or a combination of the following: face brick; natural stone; specially designed pre -cast concrete units if the surfaces have been integrally treated with an applied. decorative material or texture; factory fabricated and finished metal framed panel construction if the panel materials are any of those noted above; or glass or pre- finished metal (other than unpainted galvanized iron)." "All subsequent additions, exterior alterations and accessory buildings constructed after the erection of an original building or buildings shall be constructed of materials comparable to those used in the original construction and shall be designed in a manner conforming to the original architectural design and general appearance." 5 Compliance Table City Standard (MDD -5) Proposed YMCA - Setbacks Front Setback — York Avenue 35 feet 200+ feet Xerxes Avenue 35 feet 100+ feet Side — South 29 feet (building height) 100+ feet Side — North 29 feet (building height) 60 feet Building Height 4- stories or 50 feet 29 feet & 1 -story Parking lot and drive aisle setback 20 feet (street) 20 feet (Xerxes side to be adjusted) 10 feet (interior) 10 feet (interior) west lot has an existing parking area with a 5 -foot setback) Parking Stall Size 8.5' x 18' 9' x 18' Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet Building Coverage 30% 22% Overstory Trees 51 52 Parking Stalls — Health Club Six (6) parking spaces per court for handball, racquetball and tennis courts, and one space per 200 square feet of 333 parking stalls proposed gross floor area for all other uses. 332 spaces required PRIMARY ISSUES /STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issues • Is the proposed final rezoning and final development plan reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for the following reasons: The rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan which designates the site for Mixed Use. 2. The YMCA has existed on the site since the early 1970's, and has fit well with the mixture of uses in the area. The rezoning would make the YMCA a conforming land use. Health Clubs are a permitted use within the POD -1, Planning Office District. Other permitted uses include office buildings, medical clinics, day care, and schools. The POD District is a less intense zoning district in regard to allowed uses, than the previously proposed PCD, Planned Commercial District, which would have allowed commercial and residential uses in addition to the YMCA. 3. The City would benefit from a new and improved YMCA facility, and the site would continue with a use consistent with the current Comprehensive Plan designation of Mixed Use. 4. The existing roadways would support the project. Spack Consulting conducted a traffic impact study based on the previously proposed development, and WSB & Associates reviewed that document to determine if it was accurate. Both Spack and WSB concluded that the existing roadway system could support the addition to the YMCA. (See traffic study on pages A32 —A72.) The Edina Transportation Commission met on August 19, 2010, and recommended approval subject to conditions. (See the minutes on pages A23 —A26.) Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the Final Rezoning from R -1, Single - Dwelling Unit District to POD, Planned Office Development District -1 (POD -1), and Final Development Plan. Approval is subject to the following findings: The rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan which designates the site for Mixed Use. 7 r 2. The City would benefit from'a new and improved YMCA facility. The site would continue with a use that has been there since the early 1970's. 3. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. 4. The proposed plans meet all minimum Zoning Ordinance requirements. 5. The Final' Development Plan is consistent'with approved Preliminary Development Plan. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: ® Site plan date stamped October 29, 2010. a Grading plan date stamped October 29, 2010. ® Landscaping plan date stamped October 29, 2010. Building elevations date stamped October 29, 2010. Building materials.board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meetings. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must, be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. . 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit .a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 6. Compliance with the conditions required by the.city engineer in his memo dated November 19, 2010. Deadline for a City decision: February 15, 2011 ix 1 SON6 24wlwG City of Edina 33x7 ` il~ House Numb.r Labels 4` t Sbct Name Labels City Limlts Crooks Lake Names .... . .. .. ... . ..: - f 1 .0 IPt .. �-• .-,� '�i'_� D Parks ♦ .. R - 4 y` � � Zoning APO Icvtomat.:w game O.rrnl imD44M¢sd DorcJOn.cwl D .al y � �j !ADD SINic! D--O-- ] II ■ N00 41m— Dswnrn -yet Dmnyl 73.70 rs- KO- tln,..m Ce.rmourD�ryl !r l t Ej�t :CDJIO+.+n:.ve Coamvda. De.1��1 vc0- alPUnnoecoa.:rama:om.j 21 El r;D 4'.�o.4umra Drernl _ 24 - i+a= Pt)D -1 lvunnoa olrra D:nnn1 M. t6 719 Yo_. rr.rt. 101 T1 12 F rOD- 247un.o0OH -Drtnnl .0} 2ff1i3 NBN If} 1 y ■ PRO- 14P1onn.e Ra�am:mOmrnl _ r09 6M 707 ■ 34P oa atic -mat D.n.a11 Pa0 -a. r� �,."a 703 r '000 t10t _ . K40 lPbnnae NOCaomisOmr:nl 71, 573 D _ W ■ PRO4anoRw0-1 £.1.� 2 9tr 410 3:t ''t� 7355 ■ PAD-SI .oRo— 'D¢1 •' 3}, 4'SadlPlmuoa spa. Drnr:yl 308 103`•• ca 301 -' �y •11'317 � r ,� O ■ a -1 j5mpb Ovm'.911n.1 a 2lDeukb OwaGmp U.nl ` 2 W :OI 317 — 4 - w 7401 7400 's ^" * AND oln—e tdair._.: D.n 1 . Is7 Parcels 7405 7404 2009 At rlcl Photo y 303 rr JO} 74 K 7409 740! t °•' _ r 7413 7412 _-. MM--, W.:Y -- - 7425 7430 P 7429 7434 0 0 7433 7438 24 1 7504 7508 PID:3202824240002 I,7 7355 York Ave S �2 Q • Edina, MN 55435''1 11:IiN it ix 1 SON6 24wlwG n ` i - �'. ,i�► "M a '' N T •T+ �3 j •YY..�� ��pp pp ,p N O O � p • .Y?=G. A O/N��O$y Ov ;Y N ,.: .D� a i� Ld fWAY If Ai t. � �` •�� M �� 'Y- •� •F / - .; 1r, M Y _ [ � � 209 .� ti q ( FF(F f "fF } i 1 � Fif 1'rt rtittlE i ` i ►—# tF! IFIF EF I 1 � .•lE AL. `iiFiFrlNr � � PO 17-01 !soo } ,1Et.. RIt: z r f i � ; - N -J 7405 7404 r[ y Jf E 7409 7403 'i w _ 1yscm�a -, �-dvs cam.- ,n�c:..oasrxs ans 7625 .t� I TPA lk rD Ln > < kip 00, 77 > < 491441 libil 0 3 77 I I IMAM J31 > < Nm ; . Ji., , - YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis Association Services 30 South Ninth Street "4inneapolis, MN 55402 2- 371 -8700 fax: 612- 371 -8716 October 29, 2010 Cary Teague Planning Director City of Edina 4801 West Fiftieth Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: The YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis Southdale YMCA Expansion Project Final Development Plan Review Dear Mr. Teague, y YD4CA We build strong lads, strong families, strong commwiues. A IPP G� In addition to the information provided with the Preliminary Development Review, please accept the following and attached information as required submittal for Final Development Plan Review for the property owned by the Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Minneapolis ( "YMCA ") located at 7355 York Avenue South. Preliminary Development Review Conditions for Approval The YMCA's preliminary development plans were formally reviewed by Edina's Transportation Commission, Planning Commission and City Council. The following is an outline of the conditions for approval from the commissions and the YMCA's response in the submitted documents: Transportation Commission 1. Improve the travel management demand plan. The revised site plan provides for added bike racks, simple access to the bus stop, connected access to the City trails and sidewalks. The YMCA will work with the City of Edina to formulate a plan acceptable to staff. 2. Improve the pedestrian safety in the parking lot. The plans have been reviewed to add a pedestrian access in the center of the site from the street through the parking lot to the main entrance. A vehicle /bus drop off has also been added to the front of the building to allow better vehicular flow and a safe drop off. 3. Striping at the north entrance for two inbound and one out bound lane. We understand the intent was for two outbound and one inbound and have provided a revised design showing this configuration. 4. Improve the level of service at the northbound exit. Per #3 we have revised the entrance to increase the level of service. Planning Commission 1. Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with the preliminary Development Plan. The Submitted Final Development Plan is consistent with the Preliminary Development Plan. Final Landscape plan to meet all minimum landscaping requirements. The revised landscape plan has added the required plantings. As requested, the parking lot islands have been enhanced with larger plantings. Compliance with the conditions set forth by the Transportation Commission. See above. 46 YMCA southdale Expansion Project Final Development Plan submittal Letter to Cary Teague - October 29, 1010 4. Compliance with all of the items outlined in the City Engineer's Memo dated 9.24.10. The revised site plan addresses the City Engineer's requests. 5. Improvements to traffic flow, parking lot design, pedestrian connectivity, bus drop off and bike space should be considered as part of the Final Development Plan. The revised site plan provides better traffic flow and lot design as suggested by the City Engineer, which also includes a pedestrian access in the center of the parking lot connecting the front door to the street. A bus drop off has been provided along the front of the building as well as a bike rack near the front entrance. City Council Requested the same conditions as listed above Thank you for your time and consideration with this proposal and the City's continued support of the YMCA. If you should have any questions regarding this application, please do not hesitate to contact me at 612.371.8724. You may also contact our representative, Steve Dorgan, of CresaPartners listed below. Sin erely 7 /, I nita Lancello Bydlon VP of Property Management and New Development Representative: Steve Dorgan Principal, CresaPartners 80 South 8th Street, Suite 850 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Phone: 612.373.0287 Email: sdorgan cresapartners.com Attachments A) Final Development Plan Application and Check for $850 B) Site Plan C) Floor Plans D) Proposed Building Elevations E) Landscape Plan F) Civil Plans G) Grading, Utility, & Drainage Plan H) Color Renderings of Elevations I) Building Material Samples /Photographs Page 2 of 2 A oleO G� Existing Facility Photographs Existing Entry from Northwest Existing Entry from Southwest YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS I Y!4'IICA SOUTH®ALpE t \� FACILITY EXPANSION & RENOVATIONS BWBR ARCHITECTS 27 AUGUST 2010 Existing Facility Photographs Existing YMCA from North Driveway Existing YMCA from South Driveway YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS I YMCA SOUTHDALE A ` FACILITY EXPANSION 6 RENOVATIONS BWBR ARCHITECTS 27 AUGUST 2010 METAL PANEL 1 METAL PANEL 1 MECHANICAL SCREEN INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED SIGNAGE i YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS I 'YMCA SOUTHOALE L% FAGJI OM.- ZAPANSAON :4, r7 t. a¢ava7ia.e� METAL PANEL 1 CANOPY INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED SIGNAGE FITNESS ADDITION BWBR ARCHITECTS 29 OCTOBER 201D WOOD TRASH / RECYCLING ENCLOSURE CHAIN -LINK FENCE PRECAST CONCRETE LEISURE POOL YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS I YMCA SOUTH DALE FA,i 0. RENOVATIONS BWBR ARCHITECTS 39 OCTOBER MID -- 4-------- - - = - -- - - - - — — — — — — — — — - - o u rL o r c+�4�\`� \1 id op pp flit 11111) I � \� _� � � .�' i ° -� "7� — � sots � �� � � °,�• �•r L �i+_ �.\ l r6 .14' L o t / t BLO C y �— r o _ _ « 1 ,,,�� w I Ill �• —•M—Y \ ..+ \a \ \ \°•°��` � /� ,p '� I \— — — — — — — FYI s TON c l go ' � HC R�L CONNECT TO EX WE :J HC RAU. Eli BEL DCATE upff INALX LIOVER LEVEL 85a-5 �Y ro 2 STORY 357" 9141 S PATH ~ pt GENERAL NOTES: S[TE PLAN :01 TOTAL NUMBER OF EX5RN4 FAMCWG STALLS 324* 02 TOM HMU Or STAUS AFTER ADDITION 332 D4 SIZE OF ADDITION 22.� SOUVE FEET. 05 S12E OF RURDM AFTER ADDrWN 55,249 SQUARE FEET. 00 MET SLKMW W�SE 16,226 SOLARE FEET BECAUSE scold, (a r"t PROLPOSM CURB AND OUrrER LEGEND FOR EXISITNQ ITEMS i M TO' OF CURB off CATC4 BAST _R POST GOPHER STATE 0 NE CALL e SITE 4 5 { ] iJ LEGEND -- PNOPU3D CURB MD GURER ca v.vaw, ®omomo101vu PROPOSED RETAINWG WALL © PROPOSED PAF"C STALL GOUM vi Pf2pPff.ED Rf1E CONCRETE SURFACE [:s4Ya'Ad4G,' PROPOSED N ASPNM.T SURFACE Q) PARK9IG SITiPING m5rlAA N r ur�rrr.M. Oob {/25/1p I.� �tl Fe Mm PUWNUJO DOMMf551pN PARKLID REYKCNS FlRUI. OEYIIOPYEHT PV E GENERAL NOTES: SfTE PLAN .01 TOTAL NUMBER OF DUSTING PARKWG SZQLS J7a. 701.CG .01 TOTAL NUMBER OF S[ALiS AFIER ADOMON 352 .07 NET VI ENG FO' PRW INCREASE REASE 6 J6 SQUARE FE FEET. 0 b So tl p .04 SCTz OF BUXDING FDCMRWF AFTER AO MON 53249 SHARE FEET. T .0e NET OSLL N T WCREAS INCREASE 16216 SOUAR[ FEET. SOds N Fee! .0] PROPOSED NET WCREAti IN WPEFVIfK15 COYERVIE i1,A6] 50. Fi. F SOUTHD ALT YMCA EXPANSI vi EDINA, MN CE CEDAR 0 SARRTARY MANIKILE —, — WATERUAIN Q) L W l TR TREE (GEM) N GATE NKVE RE ...1 y Q) Q) Lmsce Caesmm. 3B0 SL Pv s—, 5.iut P.TQ MN 551( 651277701 k Cmee1— :g0.ZafA- a`1L ERGN1 r ur�rrr.M. Oob {/25/1p I.� �tl Fe Mm PUWNUJO DOMMf551pN PARKLID REYKCNS FlRUI. OEYIIOPYEHT PV E GENERAL NOTES: SfTE PLAN .01 TOTAL NUMBER OF DUSTING PARKWG SZQLS J7a. 701.CG .01 TOTAL NUMBER OF S[ALiS AFIER ADOMON 352 .07 NET VI ENG FO' PRW INCREASE REASE 6 J6 SQUARE FE FEET. 0 b So tl p .04 SCTz OF BUXDING FDCMRWF AFTER AO MON 53249 SHARE FEET. T .0e NET OSLL N T WCREAS INCREASE 16216 SOUAR[ FEET. SOds N Fee! .0] PROPOSED NET WCREAti IN WPEFVIfK15 COYERVIE i1,A6] 50. Fi. F LEGEND FOR EXISITNQI�G TC TOP OF CURB ® ® CATCH BASIN STDRM SEWER i1Y TOP OF WALL 0 57ORM MANHOLE —.— SANITARY SEWER CE CEDAR 0 SARRTARY MANIKILE —, — WATERUAIN SP SPRUCE O NTDTtAlIT 1--aCUly l TR TREE (GEM) N GATE NKVE RE ...1 WI WILLOW p POWER Pou —•V— UNDERGROUND ELECQ�� CONIFEROUS TREE 11 LICNT POLE — r.. —U. `,• O YARD UGNT DECIDUOUS TREE 01 UDLR —N LE • EUCTRC TRANSFORMER • ELECTRIC OUr.jU —FENCE C • C.5 METER CON V ® POST WIYCATOR VA w OC CpNC�j� V ••'•+ SPOT ELEVATION \K {'cow yR 4 ' utMlupli QT. YAMfD unr t15 `.S'� OflT5,1G • IxnOTrs wuR —U—T I... i3 jj ter. p DI:NOrzs PAngNC 11AU. C—I pN[n) otNaTDS NEDRMAna, As nFOA• a .. OTY PLNRi NOT F% 1 OIL S7D10051 AO eENO:uTR TDP MUT 6 NYIXiANT lf1URD W aR AK RK sn 9.k 11Y -T — Ai SNDWN MEAED'l wemtl n fcn Or SITE P6AM mNA oAnRq AREA - ]NLO.Ei Sf M 5)11 AG L IrE P00.C: I BIKE RACK (24 BIKES) PROPOSED SITE PLAN r: x v YMCA O. TROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLIS I YMCA SOUTHDALE FACILITY Ew_ -NSION & RENOVATION.- BWBR ARCHITECTS JBER 29, 2010 -; _- ___ -_ -_ -- rd -- - - - -�- .� k m Q Ic f Qa • 6 I I L lam ^�' y.�Tl�nsEm• � I Im"•u 1 it I I - 1 I / I / I I � e T 7_f.771, -- ------------ - E",YC°xismc L,� /�W �r — _ ®r k"ll SILT FENCE 7355 YORK AVENUE SOUTH 2 SMRY MW BfRL=G 4 u T;�� 1 sum CATCH EAASWS .••.LTI I � -IV•4a -� —zmsa...�Nr�/ _ - -� r ssvr�a Mi l LEGEND 1140 PROPOSED CWli0N6 PROPOSED CURB AND CULER 7L 1o>a42 PROPOSED SPOT ElEVATIW CULVRYAer cCULVCRf PROPOSED SIDW MEER - PR019SED SST mm PROPOSED SiDMPJ-K i 5' ScwDYRO STEEL FENCE POST 4'RYd SIAPPORT POST O 4' O.C. 41W LErAL AE H FRYER FMW 0DWOE MS) WEN FRYER FABRIC YIN. 1w T o a Io m s GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN See m F•h 207.CS GENERAL NOTES: D7 DE CONTRACTOR SHILL CONTACT ALL UWTTY BANES AM WAVE SAW COYPAIM LOCATE ALL LT7WIES (PIIBLC N PRRATE) BEFORE ANT' CON511R1CTION SHALL BFIOIT. d2 ALL ET705WN CONTR01. YEtSURES SIro.RI ax ENE PWS YISf BE !STALLED PRIOR To COYIONC13O71f of toNSlwlcrpN OPERATIONS N WWETARED LOOL ALL AREAS ALTERED ON TILE SITE NAVE � RESIONFD. .CO NO CONSTRUCTION WT UMN ON THE SITE NOR 96TH WM OF EROSON CONTROL F?ZUrMS LOTS BMV OLSPEC7ED N APPROVED Err THE CITY D4 NO CONSD" CNON W REM ON THE SITE UNTIL THE CONTRACTOR WAS WOImRWFD A PEACO/SIRUCOUN1 WNTEETICE WITH THE CITY. M ALL CDNSTRUCLWN SHALL BE W ACCORDANCE MW THE COT' OF EDPU N THE NINE N6 SUNOWDS N SPECUICADON$ CEA1 SPE1:610TTTONS N ADROW EPEMCATCN5 TI®R I r CAL 48 II m LEFDIE oRaRc GOPHER STATE ONE CALL 1 AREA (651) 4S4�02 TC TOP OF CURB YDD®T, FREL ,- ®o-79-,IWW TW TOP °F WALL 4 CATCH BASIN INLET eUy NO SCALE SOUT YMCA EXPA B B� s 3m Sc . C.® 3B0 S Pcra Saint Pml, m 651.2219707 C 74 .tea -e+r� rr• 9A�E.• � F• FINAL DEVELOPW E E CRE7]( WATERSHED 06ffeLT NN 1,V \w �,tN�'a�p + END FOR EXISITNG ITEMSn Q \O ®® CATCH EIASIN STOTTY SO �j 0 STORY YANDWLE — . —SANR. ICA CE CEDAR 0 SANITARY YANNd.E —L SP SPRUCE O r1Y0RAN1 CULVRYAer cCULVCRf TR TREE (OEN) N GTE VALVE REIAWiN . VALLOW O POWER POLE —m —UNO U C — coNVEROUS TREE D L' POLE --UNDER � ° O YATW UONT —n —FORCE YAM OErt000U5 TREE D UIIUIY YAWWLE OWIWRAL , O ELECTRIC TRAISFORYFA - ROLOC O IW ELECC OUR ---FENCE -FENCE Ob O GAS YOCR CONCRETE CURB Maio O POST WOCATOR VALVE �.- .. CONCRETE C—ft A>u SPOT•ELEVATION \�{ CONTOUR � ~� ° DEARRE T/] RNH A T. qCN .iDIE YONVYENT m, YAAAFD %s t°nr� a • rEROTES Ya YDRAmrT FOIPp ,� Oi eN1= PA•SIO .N ­NT . ieFOT OoFN�LITE3 WFWIATRM AS 91nW a Um" 8 Tavn •oT >m v[A>Rn. a� N ^w "eN N CWRO 1 V Vm.IIK fE NRT 6 MORANf l AR °n A ra.RR nc to KAAJ All WA. CORNER pT 1NE Syg[CI PRpPTATY w I w A$ RNIN MDQfAL Sy° Ry Euw � rt Ian � EONA AREA _ N0.1Z.A Q W iT12 AC 201.( �_ 04 T .1 \.'" `t muuuu� PLAN NOT FINALIZED�� e.1' 0 H S� �U EdinsN MI-m T G7 F.�iev.{wN ff m � 4 0� :404` EXISTING GROUND LLEEVELL PLAN A SL) PAN \\`GAG , k EXISTING SASEMENTLEVEL PLAN Al btnmA Cprnr�� S I � Planner Presentation Planner Teague reported that the .YMCA is requesting a rezoning for the purpose of building an addition to the existing YMCA at 7355 York Avenue. The proposed facility expansion would add 15,300 square feet to the existing YMCA. A new 5,300 square foot leisure pool, and a 9,000 square foot fitness center and studio would be added. Total size of the new YMCA would be 82,100 square feet. Planner Teague explained that the property is currently zoned R -1, low- density residential, therefore, the existing use is non - conforming; a health club is not a permitted use in the R -1 District. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a rezoning to Planned Office District (POD) to make the use conforming. A health club is a permitted use within a POD. Planner Teague briefed the Commission that in 2009 the City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan amendment from Low - Density Residential to Mixed Use; Preliminary Development Plan, and Preliminary Rezoning to tear down and rebuild a new YMCA with a two -level parking ramp, and a four -story, 130 unit, 136,000 square foot apartment building. The YMCA has abandoned those plans, and is now proposing an addition to the existing YMCA facility. Planner Teague stated that in order for the applicant to construct the proposed addition, the applicant must go through a two -step process; a Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning process and Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning approval. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Preliminary Rezoning from R -1, Single- Dwelling Unit District to POD, Planned Office Development District -1 (POD -1), and Preliminary Development Plan. Approval would authorize the applicant to apply for Final Rezoning and Final Development Plan. Approval is also subject to the following findings: 1. The rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan which designates the site for Mixed Use. 2. The City would benefit from a new and improved YMCA facility, and the site would continue with a use that has been the early 1970's. 3. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. Approval is also subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plans dated August 27, 2010, and meet all minimum requirements per Section 850.04. 2. The Final Landscape Plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 850.04 of the Zoning Ordinance. X11 a1-" 3. Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 4. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the City Engineer's memo dated September 24, 2010; including the addition of a pedestrian connection from York Avenue to the front entrance within the west parking lot, a revised drive -aisle entrance, and revised circulation pattern in the east parking lot. Appearing for the Applicant Phil Nylund, Minneapolis YMCA, Greg Hanks, Southdale YMCA, Steve Dorgan, Cresa Partners, Greg Fenton Discussion Commissioner Forrest asked Planner Teague if the Comprehensive Plan was changed for this site. Planner Teague responded that the Comprehensive Plan was amended in 2008 from Low Density Residential to Mixed Use. At the time of the amendment the YMCA was proposing a new building, parking ramp and four -story residential apartment building. The plan before the Commission is a revision from the previous proposal. Commissioner Staunton asked Planner Teague if there are other zoning designations besides office to accommodate the request. Planner Teague said there are other zoning classifications; however, office seemed to be the best "fit ". Staunton noted that this designation would prohibit commercial. Applicant Presentation Steve Dorgan, Cresa Partners, presented the revised plan to the Commission, acknowledging that the revised plan was different from the previous plan. Dorgan explained that the Y is very excited about the project reporting it is an expansion that includes a new leisure pool, fitness center, studio and upgraded systems. Dorgan reported the YMCA held a neighborhood meeting prior to this meeting. Concluding Dorgan said after preliminary approval the YMCA would like to revisit two recommendations from the Engineering Department; the recommended sidewalk and revision of the north entrance. Greg Fenton, with the aid of graphics explained the revised interior layout of the proposed addition and the parking lot and vehicle circulation. Fenton noted, as previously mentioned by Mr. Dorgan that the sidewalk and revision of the north entrance recommended by the Transportation Commission and City Engineer impact the project. Discussion A discussion ensued with Commissioners raising the following: If implemented as per recommendations by the City Engineer how many parking spaces would be lost. Ensure easy access to the bus stop on York Avenue Ensure safe on -site drop -off; especially for children being dropped off by a bus — there doesn't appear to be adequate room to safely accommodate drop -off — suggest a recessed area for buses. 6 ON • Will the proposed increase in square footage and the addition of new amenities increase attendance? • Where would YMCA patrons park their bikes if they rode them to the facility? • Why was POD picked and not MDD as guided by the Comprehensive Plan? Mr. Fenton in response to comments raised said if the sidewalk is implemented as per the recommendation by the City Engineer 15+ parking spaces would be lost. With graphics Mr. Fenton pointed out the issues with the sidewalk. Mr. Dorgan said the Y would be willing to look into the possibility of recessing an area to accommodate buses and drop -off. Continuing, Mr. Dorgan said the majority of patrons park in the front parking lot. With regard to the parking of bikes Dorgan said that presently bikes are parked on the sidewalk, adding he would review the site and find an area to better accommodate bikes. Mr. Hanks interjected that currently the bus drop -off area has been sufficient. Mr. Hanks added that children need to be signed in so individual vehicle drop -off of children is rare. Commissioner Brown stated he understands there is conflict between what the applicant wants and what the Transportation Commission is recommending. He said there appears to be two conditions of conflict (sidewalk from York Avenue to building front, and revision of the north entrance from the west). Brown stated he wants those issues clarified before final approval. Continuing, Brown stated he also wants to ensure that there is adequate room in the front of the building for buses, drop -off and bikes. In response to the question of rezoning the site to POD Mr. Dorgan said the City's Planned Office District permits athletic facilities, adding it seemed the best fit. Dorgan said the ordinance as it stands today doesn't specifically describe the YMCA, reiterating the POD zoning district allows athletic facilities. Planner Teague added that rezoning the site to POD also provides the City more review authority if redevelopment was proposed for the site. If the site was rezoned to MDD the door is opened to commercial; adding if redevelopment were to occur on the site rezoned to MDD the City would be obligated to approve any use permitted in the MDD district. Teague stated an office designation is more restricting; reiterating a POD zoning affords the City more review authority on any future redevelopment. Concluding, Teague also noted office is a permitted use in the MDD zoning district. Commissioner Forrest said she disagrees that the POD zoning is the best choice, adding in her opinion a mixed -use zoning makes more sense and conforms to the Comprehensive Plan. Forrest said if rezoned to POD the City is getting farther away from their goal of providing mixed uses. Commissioner Grabiel said that while this site is guided in the Comprehensive Plan as Mixed -Use, rezoning it to POD (at the request of the applicant) isn't prohibiting a future rezoning to MDD. Grabiel pointed out this is a single use site, reiterating the applicant is requesting a less dense use of the site. 7 Aalc, Public Comment Chair Fischer opened the public hearing. No one spoke to this issue. Commissioner Brown moved to close the Public Hearing. Commissioner Forrest seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Continued Discussion The discussion continued on the traffic /circulation issues on the site, including concerns on traffic flow /pedestrian safety /bus safety etc. It was noted that the applicant wants direction on certain recommendations by the Transportation Commission and City Engineer (sidewalk, access). Commissioners commented that the applicant has received the City Engineer and Traffic Commission's recommendations; the applicant has expressed they have some issues with those recommendation, so how does the Commission resolve these issues? Planner Teague responded that the applicant would need to work with staff to meet the conditions required by the City Engineer and Transportation Commission prior to submittal of a final development plan. Teague pointed out this is the "preliminary" level of the process, adding the Commission will review this again for final approval to ensure compliance. Commissioners did express frustration with the process between the Transportation Commission and Planning Commission. Motion Commissioner Carpenter moved to recommend Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning approval based on staff findings; and in addition to the conditions in the staff report, requested that the applicant consider the Commission comments to improve traffic flow, parking lot design, pedestrian connectivity, bus drop off, and bike space. Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion. Commissioner Forrest stated that while she supports the proposed addition to the YMCA she believes rezoning the site to mixed use is more appropriate. Commissioner Staunton said while he supports Commissioner Forrest's position on rezoning the site to MDD he supports the rezoning to office because it's a less intense use of the site. Commissioner Schroeder stated he supports the project at the preliminary level; however, for final review he would like to see more details and clarity on the plans. Ayes; Carpenter, Risser, Staunton, Schroeder, Brown, Grabiel, Fischer. Nay; Forrest. Motion carried. A40 8 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 19, 2010 business. Member Housh introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -104, approving a revised final development plan at 6905 York Avenue for CVS Pharmacy based on the following findings: 1. The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Final Development Plan. 2. Spack Consultants conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. And subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped September 15, 2010. • Grading plan date stamped September 15, 2010. • Landscaping plan date stamped September 15, 2010. • Building elevations date stamped September 15, 2010. • Building materials board, including colors, presented to the City Council on October 19, 2010. 2. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter of credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. Submit a copy of the Hennepin County access permit which is required for the curb cut to York Avenue. 6. Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 7. Compliance with the conditions required by the City Engineer in his memo dated September 24, 2010. 8. Execution of a proof -of- parking agreement. Member Brindle seconded the motion. The Council noted the drive - through was an accessory use and discussed whether it could be tied to the principal use. Attorney Knutson advised that was already a function of the code requirement. Member Housh called the question. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING HELD — PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PRELIMINARY REZONING — YMCA, 7355 YORK AVENUE — RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -105 ADOPTED — REZONING ORDINANCE NO. 850 -A -25 GRANTED FIRST READING Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Planning Director Presentation Mr. Teague presented the Preliminary Rezoning and Preliminary Development Plan to construct a 15,300 square -foot addition to the existing YMCA at 7355 York Avenue. He noted that a year ago the Council had approved a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Mixed Use, Preliminary Rezoning to MDDS, and Preliminary Site Plan to construct a YMCA and 4 -story 130 -unit apartment. However, the YMCA had abandoned those plans and was now proposing an addition to the existing building. Mr. Teague displayed the site plan and explained the request before the Council was Preliminary Development and Preliminary Rezoning. If approved, a Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning would come before the Council. Mr. Teague noted that four affirmative votes were required since the property was currently zoned R -1. He reported the site plan concerns discussed by the Planning Commission to provide a safe pedestrian connection and the requested reconfiguration of the east parking lot to reverse the design. Mr. Teague indicated the Planning Commission recommended approval subject to the findings and conditions set forth in the September 29, 2010 staff report. In addition, the Planning Commission added a condition that the proponents consider improvements to traffic flow, parking lot design, pedestrian Page 7 41 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 19, 2010 connectivity, bus drop off, and bike space as part of the Final Development Plan. It was noted that the Final Development Plan would need to meet Edina Code requirements so a variance would not be necessary. Mr. Teague reviewed the current and proposed rezoning request and stated'the Planning Commission and staff believed the rezoning request was appropriate since the use was consistent with surrounding uses and the YMCA had been in existence since the early 1970s. Proponent Presentation Anita Lancello Bydlon, YMCA Vice President of Property Management and New Development, stated the YMCA had been working on a revitalization plan for about ten years and accepted the recommendations of the Planning Commission. She advised of the market study completed to identify community needs and positive feedback received at informational meetings. Greg Fenton, BWBR Architects, displayed the floor plans and described uses within the renovated building. He presented exterior building elevations and reviewed the building materials. Mr. Fenton stated the YMCA looked forward to working with staff to address the five conditions recommended by the Planning Commission. The Council discussed site and building features and asked questions of Mr. Fenton. Suggestions were made to consider including a covered drop -off access, conveniently located bicycle racks, additional parking lot landscaping and /or rain gardens, and to increase the number of handicapped parking spaces. With regard to the bus stop, Mr. Teague explained staff would work with Metro Transit to assure a pedestrian - friendly location. Mr. Fenton reviewed the planned revisions to widen the access lane and indicated that pedestrian walks were incorporated into the parking lot. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 10:16 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council discussed the necessity and cost /benefit ratio of the rezoning, noting the YMCA was a permitted use in MDD. Mr. Teague agreed it was permitted in MDD and while that received preliminary approval, the project did not proceed to final approval so the site remained zoned as R -1. If the site were rezoned to MDDS, it would be entitled to uses permitted within that district which included more intense commercial. By rezoning to POD, the health club was permitted, and office would be allowed. Mr. Teague stated the Comprehensive Plan guided this property for mixed use, which would include residential and commercial. It was noted one Planning Commissioner had supported this application because of the less intense usage proposed. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -105, approving a preliminary development plan for the YMCA site at 7355 York Avenue, based on the following findings: 1. The rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan which designates the site for Mixed Use. 2. The City would benefit from anew and improved YMCA facility, and the site would continue with a use that has existed since the early 1970s. 3. The existing roadways would support the proposed project. And subject to the following conditions: 1. The final development plan must be generally consistent with approved preliminary development plans dated August 27, 2010, and meet all minimum requirements per Section 850.04. 2. The final landscape plan must meet all minimum landscaping requirements per Section 850.04 of the Zoning Ordinance. WA Page 8 Minutes /Edina City Council /October 19, 2010 3. Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 4. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the City Engineer's memo dated September 24, 2010; including the addition of a pedestrian connection from York Avenue to the front entrance within the west parking lot, a revised drive -aisle entrance, and revised circulation pattern in the east parking lot. S. Improvements to traffic flow, parking lot design, pedestrian connectivity, bus drop off, and bike space must be considered as part of their final development plan. And to grant First Reading of Rezoning Ordinance No. 850 -A -35. Member Housh seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *AWARD OF BID — TRUCK MOUNTED AERIAL DEVICE — PARK MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Housh awarding the bid for truck mounted aerial device, Edina Park Maintenance Department to the recommended low bidder, Dueco, Inc. at $77,219. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. REJECT ALL BIDS — EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS — BRAEMAR ARENA The Council asked questions of Mr. Keprios regarding the extent of the proposed exterior improvements. Mr. Keprios stated staff would reprioritize project needs because some may be higher than the proposed exterior improvements to the Arena. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, rejecting the bids for exterior Improvements, Braemar Arena. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *AWARD OF BID —TWO PORTABLE EMS ULTRASOUND SYSTEMS — EDINA FIRE DEPARTMENT Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Housh awarding the bid for portable EMS ultrasound systems to the recommended low bidder, SonoSite at $20,000. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. SALE OF BONDS $9,225,000 G.O. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN BONDS, SERIES 2010A — RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -106 ADOPTED Mark Ruff, Ehlers & Associates, presented the Series 2010A bonds that would refinance City Hall, noting it would save the City $1 million over the next ten years. He reported that five bids were received and recommended award to the low bidder, Piper Jaffray, at a true interest rate of 1.9 %. The Council thanked Ehlers' staff for its recommendation to refinance City Hall and City staff for its efforts to assure the City maintained its AAA bond rating. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -106 authorizing issuance, awarding sale, prescribing the form and details and providing for the payment of $9,225,000 general obligation capital improvement plan bonds, Series 2010A. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. SALE OF BONDS, $2,595,000 G.O. BONDS, SERIES 20108 — RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -107 ADOPTED Mr. Ruff presented the Series 2010B general obligation bonds that would finance street improvements and capital equipment acquisition. He advised that both Moody's and Standards and Poors had affirmed the City's AAA rating, which was a rarity in Minnesota. Mr. Ruff reported that three bids were received and recommended award to Beard of Milwaukee, at a true interest rate of 2.3098 %. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2010 -107, authorizing issuance, awarding sale, prescribing the form and details and providing for the payment of $2,595,000 general obligation bonds, Series 2010B. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 9 p-t � w9SN� ,1�. � L �y MEMORANDUM — Plan Review °• ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA DATE: November 19, 2010 TO: Cary Teague — City Planner FROM: Wayne Houle — Director of Public Works / City Engineer SUBJECT: Southdale YMCA 7355 York Avenue South Engineering has reviewed the revised plans for the above stated project and offer the following comments: • The site plan includes a revised north entrance that will improve the functionality of the entrance onto and off of York Avenue. • A traffic signage site plan needs to be submitted for review by the City Engineer with the building permit. This shall include all stop signs, one -way signs, HC parking signs, compact parking signs, etc. • A Ninemile Creek Watershed permit will be required, along with other agency permits such as Hennepin County Public Works and MCES. Staff will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this first review. Thanks GAEngineering \General \Y Streets \7355 York Ave • YMCA\Approval Process\20101119 review o17355 York Avenue South.docx 6a3L w9iN1r� MINUTES OF THE ow e �� Edina Transportation Commission o Thursday, August 19, 2010 Edina City Hall v 4801 West 50th • Street •1��'i88e Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Jennifer Janovy, Paul Nelson, Michael Schroeder, Josh Sprague, Tom Bonneville MEMBERS ABSENT: Jean White, Geof Workinger, Nathan Franzen STAFF PRESENT: Jack Sullivan, Sharon Allison I. Call to Order The meeting was called order by chair Janovy. II. Approval of Minutes a. Regular Meeting of July 15, 2010 and the Work Session Minutes of July 1. 2010 Commissioner Nelson moved to approve the minutes of July 15 with the following corrections or changes by Commissioner Sprague: Page 2: Sprague moved that they create uniformity and comprehensive approach for local streets vAth —a and therefore enact a Complete Streets policy. Motion seconded by Nelson. Page 3: Road Diet/Re- Striping Policy "Sprague said Bloomington has..." Road Reconstruction The motion was modified that the ETC receives annual updates of road reconstruction and the CIP, with a focus on the 2 -year plan but information on all proiects in the 5-year plan. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Sprague. All voted aye. 111. New Business a. 7355 York Avenue (Southdale YMCA Expansion) Chuck Rickart of WSB & Associates, the City's consulting traffic engineer, explained the Southdale YMCA expansion project. Mr. Rickart said the project was originally submitted in September 2008 as replacement of the YMCA with similar square footage and a 130 -unit multi - family housing complex and approval was granted by the ETC with minor median reconstruction at York Avenue and the north parking lot entrance; however, the project was never constructed. The current proposal is to expand the existing facility approximately 21,900 sq.ft. with minimal parking lot and other site alterations. The expansion would be used for fitness and aquatics purposes and it could increase membership by 15 %. The multi - family component is no longer included. Rickart said the development team was asked to look intersections previously looked at including Parklawn & York, the two accesses in and out of the site and the oval median north of the site. The traffic study analysis shows that the expansion will add 1,162 additional trips per day with all intersections operating at an acceptable level of service D, except for an E or F on some movements, most of which are onsite in the parking lot. As part of the travel demand management, pedestrian travel will be improved with maintenance of the sidewalk along York 03 Avenue, and creation of a new pedestrian walk from York Avenue to the front door. Additionally, approximately 15 -20 bicycle racks will be added. Based on the study analysis, Rickart said improvements are not recommended for the local street network. Staffs recommendation is "If so desired by the Transportation Commission, adopt a motion recommending that the traffic as demonstrated in the transportation study for 7355 York Avenue — YMCA Southdale Expansion does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation system." Commissioners' discussion included the following, followed by consultant's and staff's response: • Reason for stopping the study at year 2012 instead of 2020 — Rickart said it is best to look at the impact year (2012), instead of background traffic. • Report does not say if parking meets code — City engineer Houle said the Planning Commission (PC) reviews parking ratio. • South entrance is under - utilized, could almost be eliminated, explore options to increase usage — Houle said this entrance is only right -in /right -out while the other is both left and right. He said changes on York to accommodate changes to the access would require the County's approval and they tend to lean towards eliminating accesses. • Commissioner Bonneville said he likes the project but finds it difficult to approve a level of service E /F. Rickart said this is the current level without any crashes to date. Mr. Mike Spack, Spack Consulting, said they are defining average delay per car and if one car is coming out and has to wait one minute, this level of service is defined as F. • The island at the south entrance (on site) seems close for traffic coming into the park lot. Rickart said most parking lots are designed for drivers to go left or right upon entry, not straight ahead. • Can the travel demand management plan be improved on- the site? Commissioner Schroeder said the PC can take a closer look at this. Spack said office buildings tend to have more control over employees; with the YMCA the controls will be more difficult. Commissioner Schroeder suggested that the YMCA offer incentives that would spread usage throughout the day. • What would trigger a future traffic signal at Parklawn? Rickart said about 10 -20% increase in traffic which could be 5 -10 years out. After discussion the overall concerns were summarized as: • Improving the travel management demand plan (since the YMCA is heavily used by children and seniors); • Signage for the south entrance to encourage usage; • Striping at the north entrance for two inbound and one outbound lane; and • Fire truck and ambulance access; Commissioner Bonneville asked if emergency vehicles will be able to move around the building. Houle said site circulation is the PC's purview and they receive comments from the Fire Marshall and the Building Department official. He reminded the ETC that their purview is the roadway and local transportation while site circulation, access, and safety are handled by the PC. Chair Janovy said they are finding it difficult to separate what is happening on site with the roadway because they work together. Commissioner Bonneville said there are some things that happen at entrances that affect the roadway severely so they should have the right to review those things because of the site itself and the function of the site. Houle said the Traffic 2 ,� a� Impact Analysis would need to be changed and the ETC would be more meshed with the PC to prevent duplication. Chair Janovy said in their last work session they made a motion to refer the TIA policy for update to staff and to have Assistant City Engineer Sullivan work with staff in the Planning Department, a couple ETC and PC commissioners to try and integrate the Transportation and Planning process better. Commissioner Bonneville motioned that the minutes shall act as the ETC's opinion as to the project's future and that the YMCA and Spack Consulting look into their concerns as stated in the minutes. Motion failed for lack of second. Commissioner Sprague motioned to accept the Traffic Impact Analysis that was presented and to include their three concerns that were raised as follows: 1) Improving the travel management demand plan; 2) Signage for the south entrance to encourage usage; and 3) Striping at the north entrance for two inbound and one outbound lane. Commissioner Schroeder asked to amend the motion to read that it is their opinion that the expansion does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation systems and request that their three concerns listed above be addressed. Commissioner Sprague accepted the amendment. After further discussion, the motion was restated by Commissioner Sprague that the expansion does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation systems: however, the following recommendations are made: 1) Improving the travel management demand plan: 2) Improve pedestrian safety in the parking lot: 3) Signage for the south entrance to encourage usage: 3) Striping at the north entrance for two inbound and one outbound lane: and 4) Improving the level of service at the northbound exit Seconded by Commissioner Nelson. All voted aye. Motion carried. b. Edina Police Presentation Sergeant Tom Draper, a night supervisor with the Edina Police Department, explained the operations of the Traffic Unit. He said the unit with three officers, covers traffic enforcement from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. He said staffing is comparable to other cities of similar size. Sgt. Draper said they are required to spend a certain amount of time at locations that are called in by residents. There is a speed trailer that is moved around to different locations. He said residents begin calling around March /April to get on the list. Regarding stop signs, he said the requests are referred to the Engineering Department. He said enforcement is increased in problem areas for stop sign violations, as well as no turn on red. Regarding bicycles, he said is not aware that citations have been issued instead they are warning riders that they are required to follow the same laws as motor vehicles. He was asked about joggers in the road when there is a sidewalk — he said he is not aware of citations being issued. He said they do target speeders in neighborhoods and have found that most violators do live in the neighborhood, on 70th Street, for example, most of the violators are residents. He said officers do have discretion when to write a citation; however, most drivers have come to expect a 5 mph leeway. A moving violation citation is $150 and this is set by Hennepin County. He said public education would be helpful since most of the violators are in the neighborhoods. Commissioner Janovy said the primary focus has been engineering solutions to traffic issues. She said other communities are using different approaches such as training residents to use 3 A aT- radar gun and writing down license plate_ number and sending a polite letter from the police department. Sgt. Draper said this has been discussed which is why the radar is out there. Houle talked a project called Project Lead Foot which he said is very much like the City's program but just not captured in the same way. He said traffic safety coordinator, Boyd, does go out and use a radar gun with residents and they are usually surprised to discover that the speed is not as fast as they thought it was. Commissioner Sprague said Chanhassen has found that raising awareness is the most useful through a traffic worksheet that they distribute to residents. Houle said many neighborhoods have their own listserve and this would be an inexpensive way to communicate. Traffic Safety Reports of June 2 and July 7 Chair Janovy said they agreed that the Traffic Safety Report would be put on their consent agenda. July 7 report — Section D — regarding the calls received from residents' regarding France Avenue Restriping. Houle said most calls are due to the restriping which causes drivers to slow down. Houle explained that Section D of the report is new and is to show the types of calls that are received and that the issues are generally resolved without having to go to the Traffic Safety Committee. IV. Planning Commission Update (Commissioner Schroeder) No update. V. Bike Edina Task Force Update (Commissioner Janovy) No update. VI. Staff Liaison Comments a. 70th Street Reconstruction Update Houle approvals were received from Mn /DOT, bids are set to be opened on September 9 and construction spring 2011. Regarding landscaping in the boulevard, Houle said they will coordinate with residents to move and transplant plantings within a specific timeframe at the residents' expense. He said irrigation /dog fence is included in the construction costs. Houle shared materials from a personal rapid transit workshop that he attended. He said the presenter is willing to attend a meeting to explain how it works. VII. Commission Comments No comments. VIII. Adjournment Meeting adjourned. 4 � �a6 REGULAR TRANSPORTATION COMMISSIONMEETING REPORTIRECOMMENDATIOM To: Transportation Commissioners Agenda Item No:: III. B. from: Jack Sullivan, PE. ACTION.: ­ Assistant - Recommendation /Motion Assistant City Engineer . Date: August 19, 2010 ® Discussion 0 Information Subject: Transportation Impact Analysis - 7355 York Avenue: Southdale YMCA Expansion Recommendation: Review the attached transportation impact.analysissubmitted by Spack Consulting on August 9, 2010, review memo dated August 2, 2010 from WSB and Associates and the following staff report. Staff and WSB have reviewed the Transportation Impact Analysis from Spack Consulting for the Southdale YMCA Expansion dated August 9, 2010 and believe the development team has met our requirements. If so desired by the Transportation Commission, adopt a motion recommending that the..traffic as demonstrated in the transportation study for 7355 York Avenue.- YMCA Southdale Expansion does' not adversely affect to the adjacent transportation system. Info /Background: The Southdale YMCA submitted a proposal in September 2008 to demolish the 70,000 sq. ft. YMCA building. and rebuild a 72,000 sq. ft. YMCA along with 130 unit of Multi'- family housing. The transportation analysis was approved by the ETC with the condition that the median nose on York Avenue, at the north entrance, be modified to match the proposed reconfiguration of the parking lot. The parking lot had a 150 foot exclusive right turn lane and a shared left/thru to accommodate the-on-site delays. However, the proposed redevelopment as outlined in September 2008 was never constructed. The current application is to expand the existing YMCA facility by approximately 21,900 sq. ft. without the addition of a housing component. P -1 G:\Engineering\lnfrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Tiansportation Commission\Agendas\2010 R &R\20100819 7355 York YMCA.docx Page 2 of 2 Edina Transportation Commission Item III. B. With the revised site redevelopment the City required the development team to update the 2008 transportation impact analysis (TIA) with the most current existing traffic and projected traffic impacts. The TIA's objectives were to: 1. analyze the existing and proposed traffic operations of the following intersections: - York Avenue at Parklawn - York Avenue and the north and south YMCA entrances - York Avenue at the "oval about" north of the YMCA facility 2. Recommend improvement to the local street network, if needed. An initial TIA was submitted to the City and WSB for review in Mid -July. From that report a memo with 12 outstanding issues was created (dated August 2, 2010, not included in your packet) and sent back to Spack Consulting. The follow up TIA dated August 9, 2010 from Spack Consulting addresses all the questions and comments as outlined in the WSB memo. The Southdale YMCA's Transportation Impact Analysis shows that all study intersections will continue to operate at LOS D or better during all study periods once the facility is fully operational (2012). They have addressed travel demand management and pedestrian concerns to our satisfaction. In addition, no improvements are required of the local street network. The median nose at York Avenue and the north YMCA entrance can remain as is. Adt G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Transportation Commission\Agendas\2010 R &R\20100819_7355_York_YMCA.docx WSB & Associates, Inc. Infrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction Memorandum To: Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer Jack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer City of Edina From: Chuck Rickart, PE, PTOE Transportation Engineer WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: August 2, 2010 Re: Southdale YMCA Expansion Traffic Impaet Study Review City of Edina WSB Project No. 1686 -02 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite #300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541 -4800 Fax: 763 541 -1700 As requested, we have reviewed the Traffic Impact Study dated July 12'h, 2010 prepared by Spack Consulting for the proposed Southdale YMCA Expansion located on the east side of York Avenue between Hazelton Road and Parklawn Avenue A previous redevelopment project was proposed for the YMCA site in 2008. The original project included a new YMCA building with Multi - Family on the site. The previous plan, although was approved, is now proposed to be modified. The current proposed project involves the expansion of the existing 67,700 SF YMCA facility by approximately 21,900 SF. A Traffic Impact Study was prepared and reviewed as part of the proposed project in 2008. That study has been updated with the new development proposal. Based on our review of the updated Southdale YMCA Expansion Traffic Impact Study, the following questions and comments are made. The original Traffic Impact Study indicated that the existing YMCA was 70,000 SF. The new Traffic Impact Study indicates the existing YMCA is 67,700 SF. This needs to be clarified. 2. The Land Use discussion on page 3 indicates that the total square footage with the expansion will be 91,900. Table 2.1 indicates that the total square footage will be 89.620. This needs to be clarified. 3. On page 4 the development phasing and timing indicates that the project will be fully operational by the "END" of 2012. The analysis looked at 2012 as the full build out of the site with background traffic. What would be the impact of another year of background traffic on the study intersections? This would provide a more realistic indication of full build out impacts. �� c1wss eai- v.1EM0- atrnuw90210 YMCA-d.. Wayne Houle and Jack Sullivan City of Edina September 9, 2008 Page 2 of 3 4. Figure 2.2 shows the proposed concept plan. A more detailed figure should be provided showing the existing medians on York Avenue in association with the site driveways. 5. The existing analysis indicates that the north YMCA access experiences longer delays during the PM peak hour. How does this impact the existing site circulation? 6. The analysis shows that only 177 spaces are used on an average day. Are there events that require additional parking? The parking need should be based on a peak event. How does the parking compare with what is required by Zoning? 7. Figure 3.4 does not show existing "Stop Signs" for the YMCA access driveways. It is implied in the text that they are there. If not they should be added with this project. Figure 3.8 shows existing Average Daily Traffic volumes from 2005.2009 volumes are now available. This figure should be updated. The other figures (4.13) and analysis associated with the ADT volumes should also be updated. 9. The analysis results indicate that the intersection of York Avenue and Parklawn Avenue and York Avenue with the North Site entrance will have some movements at unsatisfactory Levels of Service. • The overall Level of Service at the North Site entrance will be at a LOS D with the westbound movement at LOS F. If another year of background traffic were to be assumed how, would the North Site entrance intersection be impacted? • The queuing analysis indicates that there may be "significant queues of vehicles waiting to turn onto York Avenue in the AM and PM peak hours ". How does this significant queue get handled on the site? • The queuing analysis in the previous study and for the AM condition shows 150 foot storage for the westbound through, left and right at the North Site access intersection. The PM peak shows a 600 foot available storage. This appears to be a typo. If that is the case the PM peak queue will be in excess of the available storage. This should be mitigated. 10. No mitigation is recommended with the proposed expansion. The mitigation, based on the queuing analysis from the previous study recommended adding a right turn lane on York Avenue and a westbound right turn lane at the North Site entrance. The queue analysis does not show a significant improvement from the original study to the current study. Why are these improvements not being recommended now? j CAWSBEd- WEEMO-W -k -080210 YMCAd- Wayne Houle and Jack Sullivan City of Edina September 9, 2008 Page 3 of 3. 11. The study discusses the use and availability of transit for the YMCA site. It should be expanded to include, how people at the YMCA can get to the transit facilities. Are sidewalks provided / available? 12. A general discussion on pedestrian / bike accommodations should be provided. A figure similar to that provided with the previous study should be included showing existing and planned sidewalk and bike facilities. Will YMCA have bike racks or other amenities for pedestrians? If so, where are they in relationship to the sidewalk and trail facilities? Based on these comments and my general review of the site configuration and the traffic impact study, additional information and analysis should be provided before any approval recommendation can be made. K3 CAWSB din,V,Emo- .w,owe -0aoz10 YMCA aoc THE iS .FcIC- , U,Y _O! "'F",I. 1, �co 0> OY f- I et. Traffic Impact Stud Southdale YMCA Expansion Edina, MN I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. By :��? �s? MichaA P. Spack, P.E. License No. 40936 Date: AuR-ust 9, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction and Summary ......................... ............................... 1 2. Proposed Development and Study Area ... ............................... 3 3. Existing Traffic Conditions ......................... ............................... 7 Figure 3.5 - Existing A.M. Peak Hour Traffic ..................... .............................12 Figure 3.6 - Existing P.M. Peak Hour Traffic ..................... .............................13 4. Projected Traffic ........................................ ............................... 16 Figure 3.8 - Existing Daily Traffic ....................................... .............................15 Figure 4.1 - Trip Distribution .............................................. .............................19 5. Traffic and Improvement Analysis ........... ............................... 32 6. Conclusions and Recommendations ...... .................... .......... 36 7. Appendix Figure 4.6 - 2012 No -Build A.M. Peak Hour Volumes ....... .............................24 ..................................................... .............................37 Figure 4.7 - 2012 No -Build P.M. Peak Hour Volumes ....... .............................25 LIST OF FIGURES Figure2.1 - Location Map .................................................... ..............................5 Figure2.2 - Concept Plan ...........................................:........ ..............................6 Figure 3.1 - Existing Weekday AM Peak Period Parking .. ..............................9 Figure 3.2 - Existing Weekday PM Peak Period Parking ... ..............................9 Figure 3.3 - Existing Saturday Peak Period Parking ........ .............................10 Figure 3.4 - Existing Conditions ........................................ .............................11 Figure 3.5 - Existing A.M. Peak Hour Traffic ..................... .............................12 Figure 3.6 - Existing P.M. Peak Hour Traffic ..................... .............................13 Figure 3.7 - Existing Saturday Peak Hour Traffic ............. .............................14 Figure 3.8 - Existing Daily Traffic ....................................... .............................15 Figure 4.1 - Trip Distribution .............................................. .............................19 Figure 4.2 - A.M. Peak Hour Volumes Due to Development .........................20 Figure 4.3 - P.M. Peak Hour Volumes Due to Development ..........................21 Figure 4.4 - Saturday Peak Hour Volumes Due to Development ..................22 Figure 4.5 - Daily Volumes Due to Development .............. .............................23 Figure 4.6 - 2012 No -Build A.M. Peak Hour Volumes ....... .............................24 Figure 4.7 - 2012 No -Build P.M. Peak Hour Volumes ....... .............................25 Figure 4.8 - 2012 No -Build Saturday Peak Hour Volumes ............................26 Figure 4.9 - 2012 No -Build Daily Volumes ......................... .............................27 Figure 4.10 - 2012 Build A.M. Peak Hour Volumes ........... .............................28 Figure 4.11 - 2012 Build P.M. Peak Hour Volumes ........... .............................29 Figure 4.12 - 2012 Build Saturday Peak Hour Volumes ... .............................30 Figure 4.13 - 2012 Build Daily Volumes ............................. .............................31 LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1 - Before /After Square Footage of Uses .............. ..............................4 Table 3.1 - Existing Level of Service ( LOS) ........................ ..............................8 Table4.1 -Trip Generation .................................................. .............................18 Table 5.1 - 2012 No Build Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS) .......................32 Table 5.2 - 2012 Build Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS) .............................32 Table 5.3 - 2012 Build Peak Hour Stacking Results ......... .............................34 Southdale YMCA Expansion i Traffic Impact Study 1. Introduction and Summary a. Purpose of Report and Study Objectives The YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis is proposing to expand the existing facility located on York Avenue in Edina, MN. They are proposing to build an approximately 21,900 addition onto the approximately 67,700 square foot YMCA. The purpose of this report is to determine if completion of this addition will significantly impact the adjacent transportation system. The study objectives are: i. Determine how the existing York Avenue South intersections at Parklawn Avenue, YMCA south entrance, YMCA north entrance and the 4 intersections comprising the traffic circle north of the YMCA north entrance and south of Hazelton Road currently operate. ii. Determine if the existing Parklawn Avenue, YMCA south entrance, YMCA north entrance and the 4 intersections comprising the traffic circle north of the YMCA north entrance and south of Hazelton Road will operate with acceptable vehicle delays and stacking after the addition is fully occupied in 2012. iii. Recommend improvernents if needed. A traffic study was prepared in 2008 for a proposed redevelopment, which included housing. The current proposal eliminates housing and is limited to expanding the existing YMCA. Based on discussions with City of Edina staff, this traffic study updates the report from 2008 to account for the proposed expansion project. b. Executive Summary The YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis is proposing to expand the existing facility located on York Avenue in Edina, MN. The facility currently has approximately 67,700 square feet and the addition is proposed to add approximately 21,900 square feet. The site is located in Edina, MN on York Avenue South between Parklawn Avenue and the traffic circle south of Hazelton Road. Access to the site will be from two existing intersections on York Avenue South. The north intersection is a full intersection and the south intersection is a right in /right out intersection. City staff has requested a traffic study be completed to determine the traffic impacts of the redevelopment on the adjacent roadways for 2012 (when it is assumed full occupancy will occur). The intersections studied are: Southdale YMCA Expansion pL� Traffic Impact Study ® York Avenue South & Parklawn Avenue York Avenue South & South YMCA Entrance /Apartment Entrance York Avenue South & North YMCA Entrance /Apartment Entrance York Avenue South & the 4 intersections comprising the traffic circle north of the YMCA north entrance and south of Hazelton Road The principal findings of this study are: i. The York Avenue intersections at Parklawn Avenue, South YMCA Entrance, North YMCA Entrance, and the traffic circle currently operate at LOS B or better in the weekday a.m. peak hour, p.m. peak hour, and Saturday midday peak hour. The study intersections will continue to operate acceptably at LOS D or better during the study periods in both the 2012 No -Build and Build scenarios. ii. The maximum queues at the study intersections are anticipated to be contained within the existing lanes through the 2012 Build scenario. iii. None of the study intersections will meet the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices warrants for installing a traffic signal in the 2012 Build scenario. The York Avenue /Parklawn intersection may meet the peak hour warrant in the ten to twenty year timeframe if traffic continues to grow at the intersection. iv. Based on the parking analysis completed for the redevelopment, it is anticipated that providing 297 total parking spaces for the site will be adequate. To adequately mitigate the traffic impacts of the proposed development, the following improvement plan is recommended: i. Monitor the York Avenue /Parklawn Avenue intersection in the future for traffic signal control. ii. Maintain a minimum 269 parking stalls on the site. It should be noted right turn lanes were proposed to be added for the site in the 2008 Traffic Study. They are no longer recommended for the following reasons: The previous redevelopment plan was more intense with a housing component proposed for the site. The housing component is not part of the current redevelopment plan, so there will not be conflicting traffic patterns within the site compared to the previous plan. Southdale YMCA Expansion 2 Traffic Impact Study • The southern YMCA driveway currently has little traffic using it. It is believed the YMCA patrons will utilize this alternate route if congestion occurs at the north driveway. The addition of right turn lanes lengthens the pedestrian crossing distance at the intersection. Eliminating the right turn lanes results in a more pedestrian friendly environment. 2. Proposed Development and Study Area a. Site Location The proposed development site is located on York Avenue South north of Parklawn Avenue and south of the traffic circle located south of Hazelton Road in Edina, MN. The existing site driveways are planned to remain unaltered with the expansion project. See Figure 2.1 for a location map. It shows the location of the study intersections, which are: • York Avenue South & Parklawn Avenue • York Avenue South & South YMCA Entrance /Apartment Entrance • York Avenue South & North YMCA Entrance /Apartment Entrance • York Avenue South & the 4 intersections comprising the traffic circle north of the YMCA north entrance and south of Hazelton Road b. Land Use and Intensity The existing YMCA is approximately 67,700 square feet. Note the 2008 Traffic Study listed the existing YMCA as 70,000 square feet, but that figure did not account for stairwells, mechanical rooms, etc. per Edina City Code. The proposed addition will add approximately 21,900 square feet, bringing the total square footage to approximately 89,620 square feet. The site will provide 297 parking stalls after the expansion project is complete (a reduction of 40 stalls from the existing 337). Table 2.1 shows the uses in the existing facility as well as the uses planned to be in the facility after the remodeling /addition project are complete (along with their associated square footages). Southdale YMCA Expansion 3 Traffic Impact Study Fable 2.1 — Before /After Square Footage of Uses YMCA staff believes there will be a maximum of 15% growth in membership associated with the new building. c. Concept Plan See Figure 2.2 for the proposed concept plan. The building expansion will be added to the west and north sides of the building. The hatched area on the concept plan shows the area where pavement will be altered. The site plan in the Appendix shows the existing parking lot alongside the proposed parking lot design. Circulation patterns on the site will remain the same for vehicles and pedestrians. As shown in the concept plan, a pedestrian promenade is proposed to connect the sidewalk along York Avenue to the front door of the YMCA building. Approximately 15 to 20 bicycle racks are planned to be constructed near the front door of the building to provide adequate parking for bicyclists. No changes to the existing driveways on York Avenue are proposed at this time. d. Development Phasing and Timing The current plan is for the addition to be fully open to patrons in October 2011. This study assumes the development will be fully operational by the end of 2011 and analyzes the year 2012, which allows traffic patterns to mature. W Southdale YKACA Expansion 4 Traffic Impact Study Square Footage Square Footage Use Before Expansion After Expansion Fitness Spaces (cardio, weights, studios, racquetball 20,570 33,450 together, walking track Locker Rooms 11,140 10,560 Aquatics (pools and Jacuzzi) 6,800 10,500 Drop -in Childcare 5,255 5,510 Staff (offices, conference) 2,010 2,360 Total Area (including hallways, mechanical 67,720 89,620 spaces, etc. YMCA staff believes there will be a maximum of 15% growth in membership associated with the new building. c. Concept Plan See Figure 2.2 for the proposed concept plan. The building expansion will be added to the west and north sides of the building. The hatched area on the concept plan shows the area where pavement will be altered. The site plan in the Appendix shows the existing parking lot alongside the proposed parking lot design. Circulation patterns on the site will remain the same for vehicles and pedestrians. As shown in the concept plan, a pedestrian promenade is proposed to connect the sidewalk along York Avenue to the front door of the YMCA building. Approximately 15 to 20 bicycle racks are planned to be constructed near the front door of the building to provide adequate parking for bicyclists. No changes to the existing driveways on York Avenue are proposed at this time. d. Development Phasing and Timing The current plan is for the addition to be fully open to patrons in October 2011. This study assumes the development will be fully operational by the end of 2011 and analyzes the year 2012, which allows traffic patterns to mature. W Southdale YKACA Expansion 4 Traffic Impact Study ac k r, , f , . ( 11 - Figure 4 Location Maps !4ulw YMCA Redevelopment J__ North Edina, MN q No Scale wlp -ji 4 "OMAL Study Intersections Study Area qu wwzjwnwm� Proposed Site _.4 47 Southdale YMCA Expansion 5 Traffic Impact Study Eg EN IRD —,.Ohaw" *­w" C-' � a�) a— Lb. it Levl. ►erY SC Pal CP 110 12 P,.,. Study Area qu wwzjwnwm� Proposed Site _.4 47 Southdale YMCA Expansion 5 Traffic Impact Study Spack I'll Q , Figure 2.2 Concept Plan YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN North No Scale Driveway Remains Unaltered New Sidewalk Planned from York Avenue to Front Door Driveway Remains Unaltered 15 to20 Bike Racks Planned Near Front Door Concept Plan prepared for YMCA of Metropolitan Minneapolis by BWBR Architects. Southdale YMCA Expansion 6 Traffic Impact Study I Existing Traffic Conditions a. Physical Characteristics Access to the site will be provided by two existing intersections on York Avenue South. York Avenue South is Hennepin County State Aid Highway 31 and is designated as a Major Collector by Hennepin County. Parklawn Avenue is a City street and is designated as a collector by the City of Edina. Existing traffic control, speed limits, and travel lanes are shown on Figure 3.4 for each study intersection. Figure 3.4 shows the stop signs that physically exist, although all driveways are legally stop condition. Sidewalks are provided along both sides of York Avenue near the site. No roadway improvements are scheduled near the site. b. Traffic Volumes The weekday a.m., weekday p.m. and Saturday peak hour turning movement counts were conducted in 2008 at the study intersections (see Figures 3.5, 3.6 & 3.7). The weekday a.m. and p.m. peak periods align with typical rush hours. The YMCA classes have the heaviest attendance during the morning on Saturdays. Since the traffic patterns in the area are most impacted by the shopping district, it is believed the late a.m. period on Saturday has the heaviest combination of site traffic and background traffic. The turning movement count data is contained in fifteen minute intervals in the Appendix. The daily traffic volumes for the area roadways are shown on Figure 3.8. c. Level of Service l_oS A �6 j. LOS D = Acceptable LOS F = Urecceptat [!Z Source: City of San Jose, CA Southdale YIACA Expansion An intersection capacity analysis was conducted for the existing intersections per the Highway Capacity Manua(. Intersections are assigned a "Level of Service" letter grade for the peak hour of traffic based on the number of lanes at the intersection, traffic volumes, and traffic control. Level of Service A (LOS A) represents light traffic flow (free flow conditions) while Level of Service F (LOS F) represents heavy traffic flow (over capacity conditions). LOS D at intersections is considered acceptable in urban conditions. Individual movements are also assigned LOS grades. One or more individual movements typically operate at LOS F when the overall intersection is operating acceptably at LOS D. The pictures on the left represent some of the LOS grades (from a signal controlled Traffic Impact Study intersection in San Jose, CA). These LOS grades represent the overall intersection operation, not individual movements. The LOS results for the 2008 study hours are shown in Table 3.1. These are based on the existing traffic control and lane configurations as shown in Figure 3.4 (ail driveway exits are treated as having stop control, which they are legally, even if a stop sign isn't present). The existing turning movement volumes from Figures 3.5 through 3.7 were used in the LOS calculations. The LOS calculations were done using SYNCHROTM software. The SYNCHROTIA model was created for this project since the study intersections are not part of the city's existing model. The intersections will be added to the city's model if the project is approved and constructed. The complete LOS calculations are included in the Appendix. Table 3.1 — Existing Level of Service (LOS) Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour York Ave S& Parklawn Ave A/C B/ F A/ D York Ave S & South YMCA Entrance A / B A / B A / B York Ave S & North YMCA Entrance A/C A / F A / D York Ave S & SE traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & NE traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & NW traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & SW traffic circle A / B A/C A / C Note: The first letter is the Level of Service grade for the overall intersection. The second letter is the Level of Service grade for the worst operating movement. All of the study intersections operate acceptably at LOS B or better in the existing a.m. weekday, p.m. weekday and Saturday midday peak hours. As often happens along busy corridors such as York Avenue, some individual side street movements experience longer delays while the overall intersection operates acceptably with little overall delay. The eastbound and westbound approaches at the York Ave /North YMCA Entrance currently experience LOS F in the weekday p.m. peak hour. The eastbound approach currently experiences LOS F at the York Avenue /Parklawn Avenue intersection in the weekday p.m. peak hour while the westbound approach experiences LOS E. d. Parking Volumes Parking capacity was determined to be 337 stalls combining spaces on both the west and east sides of the existing facility. Data on the actual number of cars parked was collected immediately prior to all three data collection timeframes. This beginning number was then adjusted based on the turning movement counts completed at the t Southdale YIAlCA Expansion 8 Traffic Impact Study site's driveways to provide a total number of cars in the lots in fifteen minute increments. Following in Figures 3.1 through 3.3 are the results of this data collection. Additional details are contained in the appendix. Figure 3.1 — Existing Weekday AM Peak Period Parking 400 350 -- - 300 — y 13 250 — — U) 200 150 - a. 100 50 0 C) LO o Un o LO o o co 't O — M d- O ch r t� 66 00 0o co 6 6r; 6 — Occupied ---- -- Capacity Figure 3.2 — Existing Weekday PM Peak Period Parking :E �E 2i :E 2 �5; �5 :�E a a 0- a. a- a. a. c_ a. �t u0 uD uO Ln (D m co ko — Occupied Capacity Southdale YMCA Expansion 9 Traffic Impact Study Figure 3.3 — Existing Saturday Peak Period Parking 400 350 300 ,3 250 U) c 200 L 150 m a. 100 all X �E :E :E :5E :�i :�i 7 :5- Q Q Q Q Q Q a d a- C) u) O u-) o Ln o Lrn O M '5: O M '�: O M O O N N N - Occupied Capacity The maximum number of occupied spaces during the study periods was 177 spaces. Average occupancy, based on the available 337 parking spaces, was 40% of capacity. Following are the high and low occupancy rates for each time period: ® Thursday a.m. -high 53% and low 31% • Thursday p.m. — high 42% and low 29% • Saturday — high 47% and low 27% e. Data Sources The sources for the data sited above are: • Turning movement counts — Traffic Data Inc. • Roadway geometrics and traffic control — Spack Consulting • Concept plan — BWBR Architects Daily traffic volumes — Mn /DOT traffic flow maps �k_� Southdale YMCA Expansion 10 Traffic Impact Study Spack <,F, � ; -.. (.,FM, I Fi ure 3.4 Existing Lanes & Traffic Control t YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale Traffic Circle NW raffic Circle NE z � ti P 44l1*1'; Traffic Circle SW Traffic Circle SE V •_► r �► (enter only) s a E N M Pedestrian Underpass 441,44 + Apartment North Driveway YMCA North Driveway * X11 Bus Stop (Routes ,a Q Bus Stop (Routes 538, 539, 578) �l 538, 539, 578) Apartment South Driveway L Z YMCA South Driveway 14 30 mph i►oo 11110111W .c 0 0 CD c S y 0 Southdale YMCA Expansion 11 Traffic Impact Study Spack -� E -i kff ,- 1.L�' <V1.'fahi Figure 3.5 Existing AM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes T YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale r �� 6 4j It 29 23 mi to m n n � u1 N 33 mm* \22 Traffic Circle NW Traffic Circle SW / L 63 v ° 4� 0 *J !4 /.55 121 titr► 7 + N CD M i Apartment North Driveway Apartment South Driveway Parklawn Avenue L 7 O d 7 C d a Y O Southdale YMCA Expansion Traffic Circle NE Traffic Circle SE YMCA North Driveway L 36 \ ♦- 24 n v 54 J t e 16 mmO v m L 20 o utDi T t it M O 4 mW M/ M � South Driveway +J*% 12 111 Traffic Impact Study p'ac Existing PM Peak Hour Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN r 1s «� I � 24 19 Traffic Circle NW 0 N 10 ID 41 1 t* 25 —� \s 'S Traffic Circle SW / L 73 �m �0 4 i J «1i� i �♦ N °' \0 co Apartment Nort h Driveway Apartment South Driveway Parkiawn Avenue t 0 m c m a a Y O } Southdale YMCA Expansion Traffic Circle NE Traffic Circle SE 0 4% YMCA North Driveway Figure 3.6 North No Scale L 14 \ 4�8 ED mIn V) , 81 J I r► 28 m-0, ' r o / L 22 6 � K4 13 Traffic Impact Study L \ 6 m n CO 4••. 0 South Driveway 93 J 0 y N Ln 84 K4 13 Traffic Impact Study p_,a crd�:,h Existing Saturday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN v 33 1 Traffic Circle NW Hmml� Traffic Circle SW / r L 95 m u`Di � i ��� �� 1 �45 12J 4'1tr' \0 �� m N m o Apartment Nort h Driveway Apartment South Driveway Parklawn Avenue r 7 O N d C d Q Y O Southdale YMCA Expansion Traffic Circle NE Traffic Circle SE YMCA North D Figure 3.7 Nortn No Scale L 19 4--w 22 tD o) N N � / 72 J T r 13 �► °� AO 14 Traffic Impact Study IL ID 0 n 4 � � j �, +-W� MCA South Driveway AO 14 Traffic Impact Study IL ID 0 n 4 � � j �, r 6 MCA South Driveway 7 JJ IIf* N m\ 20 W V AO 14 Traffic Impact Study p'a r ,t -Mk Existing Daily Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN fic Circle NE ffic Circle SE North Driveway South Driveway LEGEND 2009 Average Annual Daily • Traffic Volumes source: Mn/DOT Traffic Flow Maps Southdale YMCA Expansion 15 �� Traffic Impact Study • North No Scale 4. Projected Traffic The assumptions described in this section were reviewed by City of Edina engineering staff before the forecasts in this section were developed. a. Site Traffic Forecasting A trip generation analysis was performed for the proposed YMCA expansion based on the methods and rates published in the lTE Trio Generation Manual, 8th Edition. The Weekday a.m. peak hour trip generation is for the "one hour of adjacent street traffic" from 7 -9 a.m. The Weekday p.m. peak hour trip generation is for the "one hour of adjacent street traffic" from 4 -6 p.m. The Saturday peak hour trip generation is for the "peak hour of generator". In addition a 15% growth factor was applied to the existing entering and exiting peak hour volumes. This represents the possible maximum growth in membership. The resultant trip generations are shown in Table 4.1. No trip reductions for pass -by or diverted trips were made. It is assumed all of the trips for the site will be newly generated. Also, there is bus service available near the site on York Avenue but no trip reductions were taken for transit use. These assumptions result in a more conservative analysis. The directional orientation of the generated traffic is shown in Figure 4.1. This orientation is based on a weighted distribution of the traffic volumes currently using York Avenue South. The daily traffic volume on each road segment was divided by the sum of the daily traffic volumes on the road segments to develop the directional orientation. The a.m. peak hour, p.m. peak hour, Saturday peak hour and daily trips generated by the site were assigned to the area roadways per the trip distributions shown in Figure 4.1. The traffic volumes added to the study roadways through this process are shown in Figures 4.2 through 4.5. These traffic volumes will be added to the existing traffic volumes to develop the build -out conditions. b. Non -site Traffic Forecasting Traffic forecasts were developed for the year 2012 scenario by applying a 0.92% compounded annual growth rate to the existing traffic volume data. This growth rate is based on the 20 year growth factor of 1.2 the Mn /DOT State Aid office assigned to Hennepin County in 2008. The 2012 No -Build forecasts are shown in Figures 4.6 through 4.9. Southdale YMCA Expansion 16 Traffic Impact Study c. Total Traffic for 2012 Traffic forecasts were developed for the year 2012 Build scenario by adding the traffic generated by the proposed development, as shown in Figures 4.2 through 4.5, to the No -Build volumes shown in Figures 4.6 through 4.9. The resultant 2012 Build traffic forecasts are shown in Figures 4.10 through 4.13. Southdale YAAICA Expansion 17 Traffic Impact Study f S pa c k 7R STuMPANY Table 4.1 Forecast Trip Generation YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN Daily Volumes LAND USE ITE CODE # DEVELOPMENT UNITS (GFA) QUANTITY DAILY RATE ENTER PERCENT i EXIT PERCENT INTERNAL PERCENT INTERNAL TRIPS PASSBY PERCENT PASSBY TRIPS NEW TRIPS ENTER EXIT 15% in Membership Growth 330 330 YMCA Expansion 495 1,000 GFA 21.9 22.88 50'% 50% 0% 0 0% 0 251 251 TOTALS 0 0 581 581 AW1 Peak Hour LAND USE ITE CODE # DEVELOPMENT UNITS QUANTITY AM RATE ENTER PERCENT EXIT PERCENT INTERNAL PERCENT INTERNAL TRIPS PASSBY I PERCENT PASSBY TRIPS NEW TRIPS ENTER EXIT 15% in Membership Growth 29 21 YMCA Expansion 495 1,000 GFA 21.9 1.62 61% 39% 0% 0 0% 0 22 14 TOTALS 0 0 51 35 PlVi Peak Hour LAND USE ITE CODE # DEVELOPMENT UNITS QUANTITY PM RATE ENTER PERCENT EXIT PERCENT INTERNAL PERCENT INTERNAL TRIPS PASSBY PERCENT PASSBY TRIPS NEW TRIPS ENTER I EXIT 15% in Membership Growth 26 21 YMCA Expansion 495 1,000 GFA 21.9 1.45 37% 63% 0% 0 0% 0 12 20 TOTALS 0 0 38 41 Saturday Peak Hour LAND USE ITE CODE # DEVELOPMENT UNITS QUANTITY SAT RATE ENTER PERCENT EXIT PERCENT INTERNAL PERCENT INTERNAL TRIPS PASSBY PERCENT PASSBY TRIPS NEW TRIPS ENTER EXIT 15% in Membership Growth 14 22 YMCA Expansion 495 1,000 GFA 21.9 1.07 54% 46% 0% 0 0% 0 13 11 TOTALS 0 0 27 33 NOTES: 1. GFA = Gross Floor Area 2. YMCA Expansion Daily = 2.75 x normal ITE rate for existing 67.7 KSF x 15% growth 3. YMCA Expansion Peal: Hours = 15% growth x existing entering and exiting volumes 4. All other trip generation rates based on 'Trip Generation ", Institute of Transportation Engineers, 8th Edition unless otherwise noted. 5. All other A.M. Trip Generation is for the peak hour of adjacent street traffic (one hour between 7:00 & 9:00 a.m.). 6. All other P.M. Trip Generation is for the peak hour of adjacent street traffic (one hour between 4:00 & 6:00 p.m.). 7. All other Saturday Midday Trip Generation is for the peak hour of generator B. No Saturday peak hour trip generation is available for ITE Code 253 - assume Saturday is the same as pm peal: hour. Southdale YMCA Expansion 18 Traffic Impact Study R S a c p'/,F W . <,N4 Figure 4.1 Trip Distribution YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale I ree '14k 00, too M, Iii Southdale YMCA Expansion 19 Traffic Impact Study M S Pack THE TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY F6 1.1re 4,2 AM Peak Flour Traffic Volumes Due to Development + YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale Lo C+ ° �o �o .� j 4r ° '1 0 0 0 o i " Traffic Circle NW 0 o � o o � I / Traffic Circle SW / L zo 4j j 4 �s 20 of tij� 0 mmo o� 0 C3 Apartment North Driveway Apartment South Driveway Parklawn r 0 0 m e m a 0 0 Southdale YMCA Expansion Traffic Circle NE Traffic Circle SE YMCA North o�* I d* ° ==10 N o Lo O N t r► �.° z �% / IL -W O0 N O «� j 4 r ° MMMYMCA South Driveway o J �1 � i♦ °� o0 0 ° z "/ 3 20 Traffic Impact Study Pack S TMEsRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY Figure 4.3.. PM .Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Due t® Development YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale Apartment South Driveway 0 r 0 U) m e d se 1� Southdale YMCA Expansion 21 Traffic Impact Study Sp-ack TMF TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY Figure 4.4 Saturday Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Due to Development YMCA Redevelopment. North Edina, MN No Scale n+T. o Cq ° 0 lot _ Traffc Circle NW Traffic Circle NE o O N O «= j 4 o �► o J t �► \0 0� N o '� Traffic Circle SW Traffic S E / L 20 IL CD C4 �0 or «J j4 r,o �1 of htr° tf♦ o� o h 0,1 Apartment North Driveway YMCA North Driveway IL O ° �0 Apartment South Driveway 4 1 q'► � 0 YMCA South Driveway of ht11 o i . ° °% r O U) m d a Y O } A ss Southdale YMCA Expansion 22 Traffic Impact Study p a c'k TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY _ Figure 4.5 Daily Traffic Volumes Due to Development YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No'Scale 0 0 Traffic Circle NW Traffic Circle NE Traffic Circle SW I rwi Traffic Circle SE Apartment North Driveway = = YMCA North Driveway Apartment South Driveway Parklawn Avenue 700 0 0 rn o e d O } Southdale YMCA Expansion 23 South Driveway ATG Traffic Impact Study ack T RAFFIC STUDY COMPANY 2012 AM Peak Hour No =Build Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN Apartment South Driveway r eM 0 m c m a 0 A�7 Figure 4.6 Southdale YMCA Expansion 24 Traffic Impact Study North No Scale a c THE•RAFHC STUDY COMPANY Fin"ra'As7 20.°12 PM Peak Hour No -Build Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale r 0 U) d 7 C m a 0 Southdale YMCA Expansion 25 Traffic Impact Study ac s THE TRAFFIC STUDY COMPANY 2012 Saturday Peak Hour No -Build Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN Apartment South Driveway s 0 m 3 c as a Y O } Asv" Figure 4.8 Southdale YMCA Expansion 26 Traffic Impact Study North No Scale P a-c TRAFFIC 57UPY COMPANY Figure A Q 2012 Daily No -Build Traffic Volume YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale Southdale YMCA Expansion 27 Tc Circle NE I is Circle SE North Driveway South Driveway AO Traffic Impact Study Sp-ack I Fbff a a LN &!� Figure 4.10 THE 1&AI FIC S1 UDY COMPANY 2012 AM Peak Hour Build Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale 0 r 4s,0 4j 1 p 30 20 mi / Traffic Circle NW +a-E* Traffic Circle SW �Q C3 Leo oG� 4.0 1 r e0 r 10 ,off '1tf O 20 N CQD '1 111♦ Apartment North Driveway Apartment South Driveway r 0 rn m e m Q IL 40 \ ``4== 30 i� 000/ b Traffic Circle NE \ so�� �Ir \zoo Traffic Circle SE v O 1 L 20 \ 0 to 41 tr M O YMCA North Driveway AG Southdale YMCA Expansion 28 Traffic Impact Study L,o\ a 100 N O 4� o ~ r 10 South Driveway s0 '1 111♦ zo ej S. AG Southdale YMCA Expansion 28 Traffic Impact Study Sp-ack THE•RAFFIC S1UDY COMPANY 1 _ Fi ure 4v t 1 2012 PM Peak Hour Build Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment Nom Edina, MIN No Scale 0 m 0 c d 0 -me Southdale YMCA Expansion 29 Traffic Impact Study S ack' PTHE ItAF11C !IUDY COMPANY Figure 4.12 2012 Saturday Peak Hour Build Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment North Edina, MN No Scale /o L20\ C4 to 4J ! ♦� 10 r 40 4 1 4 4— 20 MCA South Driveway ti 1 r► 30+ i 700 1 0 0 0 "'cam Traffic Circle NW Traffic Circle NE 0 N N ti i C4 80 20 y 20 mi 10 =a► Traffic Circle SW Traffic Circle SE 0 L120 o Lo �HOw LO cc 4fib r60 01 4+ ■� 101 41 1 (* t r 0 •~ 10 C, W 10 - s Apartment North Driveway YMCA North Driveway t O m 7 C O a 0 11�3 Southdale YMCA Expansion 30 Traffic Impact Study L 10\ Apartment South Driveway 4 1 4 1. 10 MCA South Driveway titr 700 1 2O+ M o o'Z i C4 t O m 7 C O a 0 11�3 Southdale YMCA Expansion 30 Traffic Impact Study ack SHE TRArrIC 57VDY COMPANY 2012 Daily Build Traffic Volumes YMCA Redevelopment Edina, MN fic Circle NE Mc Circle SE North Driveway South Driveway Figure 4.13 Southdale YMCA Expansion 31 Traffic Impact Study North No Scale 6. Traffic and Improvement Analysis a. 2012 Level of Service Analysis The LOS results for the 2012 study hours are shown in Tables 5.1 and 5.2. These are based on the existing traffic control and lane configurations as shown in Figure 3.4. It is assumed all of the lane configurations and traffic control are the same between the No -Build and Build scenarios. Table 5.1 No Build LOS calculations use turning movement volumes from Figures 4.6, 4.7 & 4.8. Table 5.2 Build LOS calculations use turning movement volumes from Figures 4.10, 4.11 and 4.12. The LOS calculations were done using SYNCHROTM software. The complete LOS calculations are included in the Appendix. Table 5.1 — 2012 No Build Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS) Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour York Ave S& Parklawn Ave A/ D B/F A/ E York Ave S & South YMCA Entrance A / A A / B A / B York Ave S & North YMCA Entrance A / D A / F A / D York Ave S & SE traffic circle A/13 A / C A / B York Ave S & NE traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & NW traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & SW traffic circle A/C A / C A/C Note: The first letter is the Level of Service grade for the overall intersection. The second letter is the Level of Service grade for the worst operating movement. Table 5.2 — 2012 Build Peak Hour Level of Service (LOS) Intersection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Saturday Peak Hour York Ave S& Parklawn Ave A/ D C/ F A/ E York Ave S & South YMCA Entrance A/13 A / B A/13 York Ave S & North YMCA Entrance A / E D / F A / D York Ave S & SE traffic circle A / B A/C A / B York Ave S & NE traffic circle A/13 A / C A / B York Ave S & NW traffic circle A/13 A / C A / B York Ave S & SW traffic circle A/C A / C A/C Note: The first letter is the Level of Service grade for the overall intersection. The second letter is the Level of Service grade for the worst operating movement. All of the study intersections will operate acceptably at LOS D or better in all of the study scenarios. Based on level of service analyses, there may be vehicle stacking issues at the North YMCA entrance and on Parklawn Avenue. Vehicle stacking at these two intersections is addressed in the next section. K6S Southdale YMCA Expansion 32 Traffic Impact Study Figures 4.9 and 4.13 show the 2012 daily volumes anticipated on York Avenue and Parklawn Avenue in the No -Build and Build scenarios. Based on calculations from the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual, a four lane divided roadway such as York Avenue will operate at LOS D if the road carries approximately 28,000 to 35,000 vehicles per day. A four lane undivided roadway such as Parklawn Avenue will operate at LOS D if the road carries approximately 15,000 to 20,000 vehicles per day. The daily traffic volumes will be below the daily volume thresholds for LOS D on York Avenue and Parklawn Avenue in both the 2012 No- Build and Build scenarios. bo Queuing Analysis Based on the Level' of Service analyses above, the York Avenue /Parklawn Avenue and York Avenue /North YMCA Entrance intersections may have significant queues of vehicles waiting to turn onto York Avenue in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. To determine the length of the queues in the 2012 Build scenario, a more detailed traffic analysis was performed with a SimTrafficTM micro - simulation model. The intersection traffic control and turn lanes from Figure 3.4 were used with the p.m. peak hour turning movement volumes in Figures 4.10 and 4.11. These inputs for the York Avenue corridor were transferred from SYNCHROT to SimTrafficTM The simulation software was seeded with a random number seed of 0, a seeding duration of 3 minutes, and a recording duration of 60 minutes. Then the simulation software was run and recorded five times with random number seeds of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5; using a seeding duration of 3 minutes and a recording duration of 60 minutes. The stacking and delay results are contained in the Appendix. Table 5.3 shows a summary of the stacking results for the York Avenue /Parklawn Avenue and York Avenue /North YMCA Entrance intersections in the 2012 Build a.m. and p.m. peak hours. hGG Southdale YMCA Expansion 33 Traffic Impact Study Table 5.3 — 2012 Build Peak Hour Stacking Results Notes: Approximate queue lengths are in feet with the first value being the maximum queue reported by SimTraffiicTIA for the longest queue for that movement, regardless of which lane it occurs in. The second number in parentheses is the storage in feet for either the dedicated turn lane or the through distance to the next intersection. Storage lengths within parking lots are approximated based on length of total parking aisle. All of the maximum queues at the York Avenue /Parklawn Avenue intersection will be contained within the existing storage lanes, as will the maximum queues at the York Avenue /North YMCA Entrance intersection. A maximum queue of approximately nine vehicles may occur in the p.m. peak hour at the North YMCA entrance within the parking lot waiting to exit onto York Avenue. This is not uncommon at parking lot driveways on busy roads such as York Avenue. The maximum queue at the south driveway is only forecast to be two vehicles. Patrons will learn to use the south driveway as well when going northbound during congested periods. Nq Southdale YMCA Expansion 34 Traffic Impact Study York Ave /Parklawn'Ave York Ave /North YMCA A.M. P.M. A.M. P.M. Left 70 ft 280 ft 50 ft 50 ft (600 ft) (600 ft) (100 ft) (100 ft) 0 Thru 70 ft 280 ft 50 ft 50 ft (600 ft) (600 ft) (100 ft) (100 ft) W Right 30 ft 170 ft 50 ft 50 ft (600 ft) (600 ft) (100 ft) (100 ft) Left 30 ft 40 ft 150 ft 220 ft (150 ft) (150 ft) (600 ft) (600 ft) Thru 30 ft 40 ft 150 ft 220 ft (150 ft) (150 ft) (600 ft) (600 ft) Right 30 ft 40 ft 150 ft 220 ft (150 ft) (150 ft (600 ft) (600 ft) Left 50 ft 50 ft 40 ft 40 ft (150 ft) (150 ft) (100 ft) (100 ft) 0 Thru Oft Oft Oft Oft t: (900 ft) (900 ft) (650 ft) (650 ft) 0 Z Right Oft Oft Oft Oft (250 ft) (250 ft) (650 ft) (650 ft) Left O ft 30 ft 60 ft 60 ft c (150 ft) (150 ft) (100 ft) (100 ft) w Thru (550 ft) (550 ft) (550 ft) (550 ft) 0 U) Right 20 ft 20 ft O ft O ft (225 ft) (225 ft) (550 ft) (550 ft) Notes: Approximate queue lengths are in feet with the first value being the maximum queue reported by SimTraffiicTIA for the longest queue for that movement, regardless of which lane it occurs in. The second number in parentheses is the storage in feet for either the dedicated turn lane or the through distance to the next intersection. Storage lengths within parking lots are approximated based on length of total parking aisle. All of the maximum queues at the York Avenue /Parklawn Avenue intersection will be contained within the existing storage lanes, as will the maximum queues at the York Avenue /North YMCA Entrance intersection. A maximum queue of approximately nine vehicles may occur in the p.m. peak hour at the North YMCA entrance within the parking lot waiting to exit onto York Avenue. This is not uncommon at parking lot driveways on busy roads such as York Avenue. The maximum queue at the south driveway is only forecast to be two vehicles. Patrons will learn to use the south driveway as well when going northbound during congested periods. Nq Southdale YMCA Expansion 34 Traffic Impact Study The Mn /DOT crash database was reviewed (with the Minnesota Crash Mapping Analysis Tool). From January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2008 there was one crash at the York Avenue /North YMCA Driveway intersection. It occurred on June 13, 2007 and was a rear end crash between two northbound vehicles. There is not a significant crash problem at the intersection that will be exacerbated by the expansion project. c. Traffic Control Needs Traffic signals or roundabouts should be installed at intersections when justified per the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices. None of the traffic volume warrants in the Manual will be met in the 2012 Build condition. In order to meet the Peak Hour Warrant (Warrant 3), the minor street would need to have 150 left turn volumes on one approach. None of the study intersections will meet this threshold. The westbound approach at the northern YMCA access will have 80 vehicles in the a.m. peak hour with little traffic growth after the redevelopment happens. The eastbound Parklawn Avenue approach to York Avenue will have 100 vehicles in the 2012 Build p.m. peak hour. If traffic grows in the study area, the York Avenue / Parklawn Avenue may be a long term candidate to be controlled by a traffic signal or a roundabout. No new traffic control devices are required for the YMCA site redevelopment. The existing stop sign control for traffic leaving the site should be maintained with the redevelopment. d. Parking Analysis The maximum number of occupied parking spaces was 177 during the study period. The facility will be expanded by approximately 32% with the proposed addition. Increasing the peak parking demand by 32 %, results in the need for 234 parking stalls. Increasing the 234 stalls by 15% to account for additional membership growth, results in a maximum expected parking need of 269 stalls. The site is proposed to have 297 parking stalls after the expansion, which will be adequate for the peak parking demand. e. Transit Facilities There is a bus stop on York Avenue directly in front of the YMCA. Metro Transit routes 538, 539, and 578 serve the bus stop during the morning and evening rush hours. Downtown Minneapolis and the Mall of America are directly accessible via these routes. In addition, these routes stop at the Southdale Transit Center where transfers &�A Southdale YMCA Expansion 35 Traffic Impact Study can be made to Metro Transit route 6, 114, 152, 515, 631, and 6.93. The YMCA site is well served by Metro Transit bus service. f. Travel Demand Management Plan Travel demand management plans work well in reducing trips back and forth between work and home via single occupant vehicles in the rush hours. The YMCA will make reasonable efforts to reduce these types of trips. The YMCA is directly served by Metro Transit via the bus stop adjacent to the site. The YMCA implements flexible work hours with the majority of its staff and volunteers working outside of the normal 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. work schedule. The YMCA is not a large enough employer at this location to fully implement other strategies such as structured carpooling or telecommuting. 6. Conclusions and Recommendations The York Avenue intersections at Parklawn Avenue, South YMCA Entrance, North YMCA Entrance, and the traffic circle currently operate at LOS B or better in the weekday a.m. peak hour, weekday p.m. peak hour, and Saturday midday peak hour. The study intersections will continue to operate acceptably at LOS D or better during the study periods in both the 2012 No -Build and Build scenarios. All of the maximum queues at the York Avenue intersections are anticipated to be contained within existing storage lanes through the 2012 Build scenarios. The site is proposed to have 297 parking stalls after the expansion, which will be adequate for the anticipated peak parking demand of 269 vehicles. None of the study intersections will meet the Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices warrants for installing a traffic signal in the 2012 Build scenario. The York Avenue /Parklawn intersection may meet the peak hour warrant in the ten to twenty year timeframe if traffic continues to grow at the intersection. Based on the traffic analysis contained in this report, the following improvements are recommended: • Monitor the York Avenue /Parklawn Avenue intersection in the future for traffic signal control. • Maintain a minimum 269 parking stalls on the site. It should be noted right turn lanes were proposed to be added for the site in the 2008 Traffic Study. They are no longer recommended for the following reasons: The previous redevelopment plan was more intense with a housing component proposed for the site. The housing component is not part of the current redevelopment plan, so there will not be conflicting traffic patterns within the site compared to the previous plan. Southdale YMCA Expansion 36 Traffic Impact Study • The southern YMCA driveway currently has little traffic using it. It is believed the YMCA patrons will utilize this alternate route if congestion occurs at the north driveway. • The addition of right turn lanes lengthens the pedestrian crossing distance at the intersection. Eliminating the right turn lanes results in a more pedestrian friendly environment. 7. Appendix a. Site Plan b. Traffic counts c. Parking capacity analysis d. Capacity analysis backup e. Queuing analysis backup Note — To reduce the size of the printed document, it was determined Appendices B through E (approximately 100 pages of technical data) should not be printed. They are available electronically from Jack Sullivan at the City of Edina. k -1 U Southdale YMCA Expansion 37 Traffic Impact Study A . pe! °� Pr�l Im o � ' '' m} 4 aJ a �� I ; o�� r� al ompa ° o lL - I j! y ED . I ---------------- d 0 0 C a c1 �I Ij IIUI� ' d 0 . _ - - - -- —J. 10 1,1111 C ED Southdale YMCA Expansion Al Alt. Traffic Impact Study =° tl r r io �— o lL - I j! y ED 0 0 C a c1 �I Ij IIUI� ' d 0 10 1,1111 C ED Southdale YMCA Expansion Al Alt. Traffic Impact Study =° II II II II II � OP I I I // riv I 1 I I� �I�Illlllill�lIIIIII , %l�' IJ Sheet Title Proposed Site Plan Project Southdale YMCA Renovation Edina, Minnesota J WO 7\�- �I I � I� / et 1 is. WOMEN \� ���fl I►Ii „ IT Ire. Drawn Date Comm. No. Sheet No. MMS 10 Aug 2010 3.2010051.00 II B I� I 1 I WO 7\�- �I I � I� / et 1 is. WOMEN \� ���fl I►Ii „ IT Ire. Drawn Date Comm. No. Sheet No. MMS 10 Aug 2010 3.2010051.00 Lawson Commons 380 St Peter Street, Suite 600 Saint Paul, MN 55102 -1996 Voice:651.222.3701 �� B W R Fax: 651.222.8961 ARCHITECTS copyright BWBR Architects Jackie Hoogenakker From: Harold Westerberg <HARWEST @COMCAST.NET> Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2010 5:16 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Modernization and expansion of the Southdale YMCA 12 -12 -10 To: City of Edina Planning Department From: Harold Westerberg 2 strongly support the modernization and expansion of the Southdale YMCA Building. The building was constructed in 1975. Since that date the YMCA program has greatly expanded, the programs have changed and the need for more space is evident. To meet those demands a more modern building is required. The Southdale YMCA is a great asset to the City of Edina. Renovation and expansion of the current building is a necessity. 1 .r w 91r��1� o e � 0 1x88 REPORURECOMMEN RATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. II.B. From: Cary Teague ® Action Planning Director F-1 Discussion Information Date: December 21, 2010 Subject: Final Development Plan, Bruce Carlson /Centennial Lakes/Whole Foods — 7401 France Avenue, Resolution No. 2010 -130. Deadline February 15, 2011 for a City Decision: ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution approving the Final Development Plan, per the recommendation of the Planning Commission. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Bruce Carlson, on behalf of Whole Foods is requesting a Final Development Plan to tear down Storables and Thomasville Furniture and rebuild a new Whole Foods grocery store at 7401 France. Planning Commission Recommendation: On December 1, 2010, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Final Development Plan subject to the findings and conditions set forth in the staff report dated December 1, 2010. The Planning Commission also recommended that the applicant work out issues with staff regarding the proposed configuration of the drive entrance on Parklawn Avenue; the parking islands in the parking lot; and the sidewalk along France Avenue, prior to the City Council meeting. Staff has since met with the applicant and worked out those issues. The result is the attached plan date stamped December 13, 2010. The existing Crab Trees in front of the existing parking lot would be removed as a result of the new sidewalk along France. The city engineer has revised his review memo accordingly. (See the attached memo dated December 16, 2010.) ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution 2010 -130 • Revised Site Plan and Landscape Plan • Revised memo from the city engineer. • Minutes from the December 1, 2010 Edina Planning Commission meeting. • Proposed Plans • Planning Commission Staff Report, December 1, 2010 w91N�11�L 0 aeo^ DATE: December 16, 2010 MEMORANDUM — Plan Review ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA TO: Cary Teague — City Planner FROM: Wayne Houle — Director of Public Works / City EngineerV SUBJECT: Updated Memo Centennial Lakes Plaza — Whole Foods 7401 France Avenue South Engineering has reviewed the updated site plan - dated December 13, 2010, and agree with the proposed changes. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding memo. Thanks GAEngineering \General %F Streets17401 n7501 Centennial Lakes PlazalWhole Foods\ApprovaR201012W updated review of 7401 France Avenue South Whole Foods. docx RESOLUTION NO. 2010-130 APPROVING A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR WHOLE FOODS AT 7401 FRANCE City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Bruce Carlson on behalf of Whole Foods is requesting a Final Development Plan review for 7401 France Avenue. 1.02 The applicant is proposing to tear down 35,331 square feet of retail space currently occupied by Storables and Thomasville Furniture to build a new 36,346 square foot Whole Foods grocery store. 1.03 The subject property is 6.4 acres in size, and is part of the Centennial Lakes development. The site is designated for retail use in the Overall Development Plan for the site. 1.04 On November 18, 2010, the Transportation Commission recommended approval of the traffic study. 1.05 On December 1, 2010, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Final Development Plan. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Final Development Plan. 2.02 Westwood Professional Services conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Final Development Plan at 7401 France Avenue for Whole Foods. Approval of the Final Development Plan is subject to the following conditions: Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped December 13, 2010. • Grading plan date stamped October 29, 2010. City Hall . Building elevations date stamped October 29, 2010. FAX 9522 26 -039 `� g p FAX 952 - 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET TTY 952- 826 -0379 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com RESOLUTION NO. 2010-130 Page Two Building materials board including colors as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 6. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated December 16, 2010. Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on , 2010. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK RESOLUTION NO. 2010-130 Page Two I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2010 City Clerk ^2010 I OmtWwd Prof..Ind S-Ama Ina I I z n m m z C m En O c ". �aNPW14YP4ah INnTrwrRar NOW MMavwu FMS om® IWLWW 1�Hm41a YYY6tWYDOd use I� Y Itub it �� 1AV � IflN9 General Site Notes 1. BACKGROUND SURVEY BFARt1ATION FOR THIS PROJECT PROVIDED BY WESTWOOD FIELD SURVEY INFORMATION DATED 8/26/2010 2. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THIS R RE AN A APPROXIMATE- CONTRACTOR SHALL FELD VERIFY STE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TD DGVATION /CONSTRICTION. P ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND. THE ENGINEER SHOULD BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY. S REFER TO BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR LOT BEARINGS, DIMENSIONS AND AREAS 4. ALL DI ENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB OR EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT BUILDING. DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS CF OCTS, RAMPS. AND TRUCK DOCKS 6. ALL CLBB RADO SHALL BE SO FEET (TO FAQ OF OURS) UMiSS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. ALL CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE 0612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. B. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SONS ORECTIONAL SIGNS FLACQIS AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT CE TRAFFIC WERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE "CS SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY AND ENGINEER PROs TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TD APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDAD& B. B IUKINOUS PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE SECTIONS TO BE N ACCODANCE 147H THE RECOMMENDATIONS RATIONS OF THE CEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER 10 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN FULL ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES 11. SITE LIGHTING SHOWN ON PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. REFER TO UGN,NG PLAN PREPARED BY OTHERS FOR SITE UONTING DETAILS AND PHOTOMETRRS Site Legend -- — — -- — PROPERTY LINE — - — - — LOT UNE — — — — — — SETBACK LINE ______ -- - ______- EASEMENT LINE CURB AND GUTTER we�eereerN TIP OUT CURB AMID GUTTER .. — ... — POD NORMAL WATER LEVEL 0 0 0 n r RETAINING WALL FENCE CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT STANDARD DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS TRANSFORMER SITE LIGHTING TRAFFIC SGN POWER POLE BOLLARD / POST SiVage and Striping Nobel 1. ALL TRAFFIC SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM 70 THE STANDARDS OF THE FKA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCO). 2. P LOT STRIPING SHALL BE 4' WIDE COLOR WHITE. TWO COATS OF PAINT. CONTRACTOR SMALL PANT ANY /ALL DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC ARROWS AS SHOWN IN WHITE (TWO COATS). 3. ACCESSIBLE PARKING PROVIDED PER ADA CODE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PANT THE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY IN EACH DESONATED ACCESSIBLE STALL IN BWE BACKGROUND WITH WHITE BORDER (TWO COATS OF PAINT). CONTIUCTOR SHALL PAINT THE WORDS 'NO PARKING' N EACH rrrevle v ISLE ADJACENT 70 AN ACCESSIBLE SPACE IN WHITE LETTERS MINIMUM 12' IN HEIGHT. 4. ALL BONS SHALL INCLUDE POST. CONCRETE FOOTING AND CASING WHERE REOURED. CONCRETE CASING REWIRED IN LOCATIONS WERE POST IS NOT PROTECTED BY CURB. 5. ALL STOP SONS SMALL INCLUDE A 24' WIDE PAINTED STOP BAR IN WHITE PAINT (TWO COATS) PLAID AT THE SKIP SIGN LOCATION, A MINIMUM OF 4' FROM CROSSWALK ALL STOP BARS SHALL EXTEND FROM DIRECTIONAL TRANSITION BETWEEN LANES TO THE CURB. S. ALL SIGNS SHALL BE BE PLACED 18' BEHIND THE BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION �_• m I Centennial Was Plaza, LLC \ Mid- America Real Estate- Minnesota, LLC 5.51 W4yot4 B-kv -% SuLNN 650 Cdl 413 Noun befam dpgbp: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Tdn qty Mw 651 -45 112 4 -00 lmb TOO F— 1 -800- 252 -1166 Site Notes A 4' TRAFFIC WHITE LANE STRIPE (7wJ B 4' DOUBLE YELLOW LANE STRIPE (TYP.) C C YEILON DIACONAL STRIPE D 4' WHITE DIAGONAL STRIPE E GRNO/REMOVE CONCRETE FOR 5 RADIUS F MATCH EXISTING CURB W GUTTER 0 MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT H MATCH EXISTING OONOETE (WALK OR DOVE) I EXISTING CONCRETE CURB J PLANYED AREA K EKSTNG MONUMENT SON L CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND JOINTING (REFER ARCM PLANS) M CONCRETE PAVDEM (SEE SIRUCTIRAL PLANS) N 10' CURB TRANSITION TO FLUSH O STEPS AND HANDRAIL (SEE ARCH. PLANS) P RETAINING WALL (SEE STRUCTURAL PUNS) 0 SCREEN WALL (SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS) R EXISTING STAIRWELL S OVERHEAD CLEARANCE BAR (SEE ARCH. PLANS) T EXISTING COLORED SIDEWALK U DaSTNG CONCRETE PAVDENT V TRANSFORMER M Site Details 1 6612 CURB 6 GUTTER 4 D415 Cum & GAITER 8 INTEGRAL CURB AND WALK 7 CONCRETE CROSS GUTTER 11 ACCESSIBLE DROPPED PEDESTRIAN RUMP 12 CROSS WALK STRIPING 14 TRAFFIC ARROW 15 PANTED STOP BAR AND STOP SIGN POST BASE 16 HANDICAP ASE SGNACE AND STRING 19 BOLLARD 20 STANDARD DUTY PAVEMENT 21 HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT 22 CONCRETE WALK 23 CONCRETE PAVEMEM 25 BITUMINOUS MILL AND OVERLAY ® Sign Legend g� Slg NnDRT DESIGNATION 51 STOP SGN 30' X 30' R1 -1 5.2 HANDICAP ABBE 12' X 18' R7 -ISM S3 FIRE LANE / NO PARKING 12' K 12' RO-35 5.12 NO TRUCKS SIGN 24' X 24' R -12 Sheet Index Cl CIVIL SITE PLAN C2 EXISTING CONDITIONS C3 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C4 UTILITY PLAN L1 TREE INVENTORY & PRESERVATION PLAN L2 LANDSCAPE PLAN E1 SITE LIGHTING PLAN mm—," DI 10/29/10 ctr Cl as y Whole Foods I alp site plan J X 6O 90' 0' 1. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION �_• m I Centennial Was Plaza, LLC \ Mid- America Real Estate- Minnesota, LLC 5.51 W4yot4 B-kv -% SuLNN 650 Cdl 413 Noun befam dpgbp: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Tdn qty Mw 651 -45 112 4 -00 lmb TOO F— 1 -800- 252 -1166 Site Notes A 4' TRAFFIC WHITE LANE STRIPE (7wJ B 4' DOUBLE YELLOW LANE STRIPE (TYP.) C C YEILON DIACONAL STRIPE D 4' WHITE DIAGONAL STRIPE E GRNO/REMOVE CONCRETE FOR 5 RADIUS F MATCH EXISTING CURB W GUTTER 0 MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT H MATCH EXISTING OONOETE (WALK OR DOVE) I EXISTING CONCRETE CURB J PLANYED AREA K EKSTNG MONUMENT SON L CONCRETE SIDEWALK AND JOINTING (REFER ARCM PLANS) M CONCRETE PAVDEM (SEE SIRUCTIRAL PLANS) N 10' CURB TRANSITION TO FLUSH O STEPS AND HANDRAIL (SEE ARCH. PLANS) P RETAINING WALL (SEE STRUCTURAL PUNS) 0 SCREEN WALL (SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS) R EXISTING STAIRWELL S OVERHEAD CLEARANCE BAR (SEE ARCH. PLANS) T EXISTING COLORED SIDEWALK U DaSTNG CONCRETE PAVDENT V TRANSFORMER M Site Details 1 6612 CURB 6 GUTTER 4 D415 Cum & GAITER 8 INTEGRAL CURB AND WALK 7 CONCRETE CROSS GUTTER 11 ACCESSIBLE DROPPED PEDESTRIAN RUMP 12 CROSS WALK STRIPING 14 TRAFFIC ARROW 15 PANTED STOP BAR AND STOP SIGN POST BASE 16 HANDICAP ASE SGNACE AND STRING 19 BOLLARD 20 STANDARD DUTY PAVEMENT 21 HEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT 22 CONCRETE WALK 23 CONCRETE PAVEMEM 25 BITUMINOUS MILL AND OVERLAY ® Sign Legend g� Slg NnDRT DESIGNATION 51 STOP SGN 30' X 30' R1 -1 5.2 HANDICAP ABBE 12' X 18' R7 -ISM S3 FIRE LANE / NO PARKING 12' K 12' RO-35 5.12 NO TRUCKS SIGN 24' X 24' R -12 Sheet Index Cl CIVIL SITE PLAN C2 EXISTING CONDITIONS C3 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN C4 UTILITY PLAN L1 TREE INVENTORY & PRESERVATION PLAN L2 LANDSCAPE PLAN E1 SITE LIGHTING PLAN mm—," DI 10/29/10 ctr Cl as y Whole Foods I alp site plan J 02010 Weal —d Prollssimal SerNces, Inc. FRANCE BOL Fv REMOVE SELECT TREES ADD KARL FOERSIER CRASS; AUTUMN JOY SEMI( AND STELA DE GPO BATLEY. KEEPSGT! FI AN TWGS A TECRNY ARBORVITAE 017NTAf EY=E.liE REMOVE EVERGREEN TEES AND ALL SERUM ADD BOULDERS COBBLESTONES PM SPIRE CRABS KARL FOEM7ER GLASS SGADA AMW£R STELLA BE ORO DA716Y, AW AUTIAN JOY /�EOSTTNC 2' NNE/ WI I TO REM. E TREES TECRNY KEEP CRASS AND SHRUBS .. ADD nArrsn DINER SRUM TO FDL N G4P5 ON SD , • •A'EE1A CRASL'� ADD BOIADERS AND _ KARL FOFRSTEFA CFA KfE ROSES I i"' i l EIl7YY( EM REW E(�•�+� EVERGREEN TREES AND ALL SRG.NS ADD HaNMOOUST TREES AND RED FLAME GRASS SLOSC BE2 KEEP SERUM ADD POD SPRF CRABS AND FLECOMOMN SHRUBS TO FILL N GAPS PARONG I9ARDS REMOVE SHNBS ADD IX.RSEESTON17% BERBERS AND KARL FLIEMIER GRAS s � t 0 or BWALDE7S RLD MMF CPAS. AND KARL FO RSTER GRAS 1=1 AD7 DRAW XEEP EVERGREEN BOLDING REST. AABCRMAC AUDI 1 LEAC RED FLAME T`' O \t4 GRA55 KARL FCERSIER GRAS£ \ STELAA DE LOUD DAYLEY. AND Y AUTUMN DY 5Emm O ayr O MONWENY KEEP MANTOVLS AMYL IMOTE'SPIRE BRCIL 76TH GLASS AUTUMN JOY SEWµ STELAA BE ORO DAYULr, AND ANNUALS G1�6D Y Apo CRABS N MISS LOCATIONS AND ADD SOLDERS AND KARL FOERSTER CRASS N BOULEVARD I /' — STAR PLANTEBL STELAA BE OR COM T ES AND d111Ar / 9 AEEP TREES REMOVE / SHRUBS ADD RFD MAO/ GRAi� KARL fOERS7ER GRAS$ AUf1ON JOY � ` SIFLLA DE 64 NA Alm ANNUALS L& REMOVE/ BOULDOM RED FL1UE1 GRASS AND KARL FOERSTER RRAS REMOIf �RTnr TREf/S Cyr REPLACE R6YACE NN TEY C HTAE / E4ATHa►IIMOII � � FloN MP�INO 1walA0 1�d4 NmE n IAIWnWEOOd •�rtm Ir. 72/IOAO ue�r 2.�0 WIN CITY ABOUT C BOULEVARD FEANt ➢oL5 R MEDLAR Umdwape Notes 1. VERFT ALL LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS N1TM REMOVALS AND Sr1E V,VRIL 2 ALL DISTURBED LANDSCAPED AREAS NOT INDICATED AS PLANTING BEDS. ME TO BE SE EDED. UNLESS NOTED OTMERNISE SEEDING TO BE PER MIMESOTA DEPARTMENT D MANSPINiTAMON STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. 2000 EDITION AND PER 2007 SLIDING MANUAL SW 15 TO BE RDIARILY KENTUCKY LRUCCRASS. FREE OF LARN GRASS NEEDS MATCH INTO EXISTING AS APPUCABLE ANCHOR SOD ON SLOPED ON POTENTIAL EROSON AREAS OR AS REMAND. 1 CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY PLANTS REQUIRED AS REFLECTED ON RAN. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARWTECT IF FILM AND SCHEME DO NOT MATCH. ALL RANT MATERIAL TO ADHERE TO THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOOL LATEST VERSION. ADD FERPUZER. MERBACIDE. AND PESTICIDE AS NECESSARY FOR OFTWUM MONTH. 4. PRDMDE A WNIMUM OF 4' TOPSOIL IN LAWN AREAS AND 12' TOPSOIL IN LANDSCAPE SEDS MD SOL AMENDMENTS FOR OPTIMUM PLANT CIONTH. ALL PARIDIO ISLAND GRADES SMALL HAVE A SIGNIRCMT CROWN. S ALL FILMING BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGED TO A MOMMUM DEPTH O 4' AS L40M ON PLANS. S. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH SILALL BE COLORED. RID CANYON BY SYLVA ON APPROVED ERIN, MD AT A MINIMUM 4' DEPM FREE D ALL DELETERIOUS MATERIAL 7. ROC( COD TONES TO BE A VARIETY D FIELD STONES RANGING IN 512E APPROXIMATELY 4' TO 1Y DIAMETER AND MCHOOD N THE GROU . BOULDER TO BE NASOTA OR CHILTON MESTiNE(TM) APPROXIMATELY 24' RIDE X 24' HICI X 4B' LONG ROUGH FACE. MCHaREO ON TOP OF GROUND AND LE O- ONI AAIIDYAPE ARMTECT TO APPROVE PRIOR TO OEUV .. R. SINCE TREE AND SHRUB RANTNGS SMALL HAVE A 4' DO M SNEDDED MARDW000, MULCH FUND AROUND EACH BASE. DECIDUOUS PLANT MATERIAL SMALL HAVE A MINIMUM 3' DIAMETER RNO. EVERGREEN PLANT MATERIAL SMALL HAVE A NNO TO THE DRIP LINE. B. EXBING TREES AND S1PNIBS. THROUGHOUT THE PROPERTY, SILL BE PRUNED TO REMOVE DEAD OR UNDESRABLE MOB AND TO SHAPE PLANT FOR DE9RABIE APPEMMCE AND COMPLETED BY A OUMFIED INDIVIDUAL CONTRACTOR TO 0.EAR AND GRUB EASTMG VEGETATION AND DISPOSE OF ALL REMOVALS OFF -SITE PER PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS. 10. CONTRACTOR TO WATER RAPT MATERIAL DUMO INSTALLATION AND DURING 0 MJSIMENT PERIOD. VOLUME D WATER TO BE PER PLANT REMREMENT FOR ESTABLISHMENT AND NORMAL OROWOL WATER CASTING PLANTS UNTL RPGATHON SYSTEM 15 FULLY OPEOTMNAL 11. CONTRACTOR TO WARRANTY NEW RAPT MATERIAL FOR OE -YEAR UPON PROJECT COMPLETION AND OWNER'S ACCEPTANCE lL PROPERTY SMALL HAVE AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND INIRCAnON SYSTEM. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS TO BE IRRIGATED, EXCEPT AS NOTED. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE S1UP DRAM FDR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT APPROVAL. SYSTEM SMALL BE MTEROED(BLOWN -OUT) AFTER THE FfKT OPERATIONAL SEASON AND SHALL PROVIDE STARTUP THE FOLLOWING SPRING MGATON SHALL HAVE TWO -YEAR WARRANTY ON PARTS AND LABOR FOUDWNG INSTALLATION APPROVAL BY CYHER. PROVDE BACNLOW OEVIM WATER METER. BOOSTER PUMP, CCHTNO.M. RAN SENSOL MIRES, VALVE BOXES. SLEEVING. VALVES, ROTORS. SPRAYS. M OM D OTHER ACCESSORIES FOR A COMPLETE SYSTEM. YmVY OR PROVIDE NEW SYSTEM. 11 LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAY BE PHASED AS COONDNATED WITH PROPERTY MANAGER. 14. CONCRETE RANTER TO BE APPROXIMATELY 30' MIDN AND 4r DALEBR. ORNAMENTAL MATCH EASRNG. landeoap0 Data 2O-0 KEEP TREES REMOVE INQUIRE NTH arr AND ANWERS REPLACE MIN ADJACf}/7 PROPERTY DOULOM LITTLE BLUE BDRDDtS RED OVEtSTDRY TREE OMQR ABOUT MATTYWG SRL GRASS KARL CYAy; GRASS STELLA REMREMENIS gDU(( fXREVARD PLANTINGS OE OE MD DAV2AY, AND DA12dY N OYTRSTORY TREE AUFL N .0, SEWµ %� A• CALCIMTDN: TREES AND UNDERSTDRY TREE _ = FOERSTER MASS AND SHRUB FUU COMPLEMENT OF UMDESTORY TREES AND SHRUBS. MINNUM TREE 517E TRFC TYPE OEIDOLM!LIe OONREROUS PFTRHZNTAGE FOR 24'4 BLDG MT.: EMMENTAL 10'- CAL 5'- MT. 5X A /ONIMET? 9CMON., REF KEEP PLAN7NG5 PARKIAWN AVENUE QPERENNALS FULL 55'. CAL. 12'4 MT. 202 TREE ROOT AND SPECIES: / SCRI CHUG: \ BLNJVWC NORTH AND WEST.. - r Bi N � E L Rea I\ EXISTING TREE CREDO: I (' IFONY ARBORMTAS COMPACT 2' CAL.9B AMUR MAPLE DWARF KDLEAN CASTING TREE SNMART LAAC AND RED FLAME MAM \ RSC N WHOLE FOODS MARKET S 82,810 OF 3Y Y CAL BB FF BbD� 1. �- J CONCRETE PLANTERS NM j -\ F': °_ O m .; e, ANNUALS t \ , EVENESIII - 16 ONFSTONT(NLL) Z - B UNDENSTORY ORNAIENTAL(ONAMEMAL) FULL MT B - 33 EVEROEENOMW Tn { (-- ROUBLE SHRUBS ADD p rL FL -- IF AND RARE FOOMER MASS FRANCE BOL Fv REMOVE SELECT TREES ADD KARL FOERSIER CRASS; AUTUMN JOY SEMI( AND STELA DE GPO BATLEY. KEEPSGT! FI AN TWGS A TECRNY ARBORVITAE 017NTAf EY=E.liE REMOVE EVERGREEN TEES AND ALL SERUM ADD BOULDERS COBBLESTONES PM SPIRE CRABS KARL FOEM7ER GLASS SGADA AMW£R STELLA BE ORO DA716Y, AW AUTIAN JOY /�EOSTTNC 2' NNE/ WI I TO REM. E TREES TECRNY KEEP CRASS AND SHRUBS .. ADD nArrsn DINER SRUM TO FDL N G4P5 ON SD , • •A'EE1A CRASL'� ADD BOIADERS AND _ KARL FOFRSTEFA CFA KfE ROSES I i"' i l EIl7YY( EM REW E(�•�+� EVERGREEN TREES AND ALL SRG.NS ADD HaNMOOUST TREES AND RED FLAME GRASS SLOSC BE2 KEEP SERUM ADD POD SPRF CRABS AND FLECOMOMN SHRUBS TO FILL N GAPS PARONG I9ARDS REMOVE SHNBS ADD IX.RSEESTON17% BERBERS AND KARL FLIEMIER GRAS s � t 0 or BWALDE7S RLD MMF CPAS. AND KARL FO RSTER GRAS 1=1 AD7 DRAW XEEP EVERGREEN BOLDING REST. AABCRMAC AUDI 1 LEAC RED FLAME T`' O \t4 GRA55 KARL FCERSIER GRAS£ \ STELAA DE LOUD DAYLEY. AND Y AUTUMN DY 5Emm O ayr O MONWENY KEEP MANTOVLS AMYL IMOTE'SPIRE BRCIL 76TH GLASS AUTUMN JOY SEWµ STELAA BE ORO DAYULr, AND ANNUALS G1�6D Y Apo CRABS N MISS LOCATIONS AND ADD SOLDERS AND KARL FOERSTER CRASS N BOULEVARD I /' — STAR PLANTEBL STELAA BE OR COM T ES AND d111Ar / 9 AEEP TREES REMOVE / SHRUBS ADD RFD MAO/ GRAi� KARL fOERS7ER GRAS$ AUf1ON JOY � ` SIFLLA DE 64 NA Alm ANNUALS L& REMOVE/ BOULDOM RED FL1UE1 GRASS AND KARL FOERSTER RRAS REMOIf �RTnr TREf/S Cyr REPLACE R6YACE NN TEY C HTAE / E4ATHa►IIMOII � � FloN MP�INO 1walA0 1�d4 NmE n IAIWnWEOOd •�rtm Ir. 72/IOAO ue�r 2.�0 WIN CITY ABOUT C BOULEVARD FEANt ➢oL5 R MEDLAR Umdwape Notes 1. VERFT ALL LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS N1TM REMOVALS AND Sr1E V,VRIL 2 ALL DISTURBED LANDSCAPED AREAS NOT INDICATED AS PLANTING BEDS. ME TO BE SE EDED. UNLESS NOTED OTMERNISE SEEDING TO BE PER MIMESOTA DEPARTMENT D MANSPINiTAMON STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION. 2000 EDITION AND PER 2007 SLIDING MANUAL SW 15 TO BE RDIARILY KENTUCKY LRUCCRASS. FREE OF LARN GRASS NEEDS MATCH INTO EXISTING AS APPUCABLE ANCHOR SOD ON SLOPED ON POTENTIAL EROSON AREAS OR AS REMAND. 1 CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY PLANTS REQUIRED AS REFLECTED ON RAN. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARWTECT IF FILM AND SCHEME DO NOT MATCH. ALL RANT MATERIAL TO ADHERE TO THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOOL LATEST VERSION. ADD FERPUZER. MERBACIDE. AND PESTICIDE AS NECESSARY FOR OFTWUM MONTH. 4. PRDMDE A WNIMUM OF 4' TOPSOIL IN LAWN AREAS AND 12' TOPSOIL IN LANDSCAPE SEDS MD SOL AMENDMENTS FOR OPTIMUM PLANT CIONTH. ALL PARIDIO ISLAND GRADES SMALL HAVE A SIGNIRCMT CROWN. S ALL FILMING BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGED TO A MOMMUM DEPTH O 4' AS L40M ON PLANS. S. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH SILALL BE COLORED. RID CANYON BY SYLVA ON APPROVED ERIN, MD AT A MINIMUM 4' DEPM FREE D ALL DELETERIOUS MATERIAL 7. ROC( COD TONES TO BE A VARIETY D FIELD STONES RANGING IN 512E APPROXIMATELY 4' TO 1Y DIAMETER AND MCHOOD N THE GROU . BOULDER TO BE NASOTA OR CHILTON MESTiNE(TM) APPROXIMATELY 24' RIDE X 24' HICI X 4B' LONG ROUGH FACE. MCHaREO ON TOP OF GROUND AND LE O- ONI AAIIDYAPE ARMTECT TO APPROVE PRIOR TO OEUV .. R. SINCE TREE AND SHRUB RANTNGS SMALL HAVE A 4' DO M SNEDDED MARDW000, MULCH FUND AROUND EACH BASE. DECIDUOUS PLANT MATERIAL SMALL HAVE A MINIMUM 3' DIAMETER RNO. EVERGREEN PLANT MATERIAL SMALL HAVE A NNO TO THE DRIP LINE. B. EXBING TREES AND S1PNIBS. THROUGHOUT THE PROPERTY, SILL BE PRUNED TO REMOVE DEAD OR UNDESRABLE MOB AND TO SHAPE PLANT FOR DE9RABIE APPEMMCE AND COMPLETED BY A OUMFIED INDIVIDUAL CONTRACTOR TO 0.EAR AND GRUB EASTMG VEGETATION AND DISPOSE OF ALL REMOVALS OFF -SITE PER PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS. 10. CONTRACTOR TO WATER RAPT MATERIAL DUMO INSTALLATION AND DURING 0 MJSIMENT PERIOD. VOLUME D WATER TO BE PER PLANT REMREMENT FOR ESTABLISHMENT AND NORMAL OROWOL WATER CASTING PLANTS UNTL RPGATHON SYSTEM 15 FULLY OPEOTMNAL 11. CONTRACTOR TO WARRANTY NEW RAPT MATERIAL FOR OE -YEAR UPON PROJECT COMPLETION AND OWNER'S ACCEPTANCE lL PROPERTY SMALL HAVE AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND INIRCAnON SYSTEM. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS TO BE IRRIGATED, EXCEPT AS NOTED. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE S1UP DRAM FDR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT APPROVAL. SYSTEM SMALL BE MTEROED(BLOWN -OUT) AFTER THE FfKT OPERATIONAL SEASON AND SHALL PROVIDE STARTUP THE FOLLOWING SPRING MGATON SHALL HAVE TWO -YEAR WARRANTY ON PARTS AND LABOR FOUDWNG INSTALLATION APPROVAL BY CYHER. PROVDE BACNLOW OEVIM WATER METER. BOOSTER PUMP, CCHTNO.M. RAN SENSOL MIRES, VALVE BOXES. SLEEVING. VALVES, ROTORS. SPRAYS. M OM D OTHER ACCESSORIES FOR A COMPLETE SYSTEM. YmVY OR PROVIDE NEW SYSTEM. 11 LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAY BE PHASED AS COONDNATED WITH PROPERTY MANAGER. 14. CONCRETE RANTER TO BE APPROXIMATELY 30' MIDN AND 4r DALEBR. ORNAMENTAL MATCH EASRNG. landeoap0 Data 2O-0 YDD-6 MIXED DEVELOPMENT OSTRICT 6 OVEtSTDRY TREE 1 TREE PER 40 LF D PROPERTY PEINETER REMREMENIS 0 OYTRSTORY TREE OEW S SMAGE REE CALCIMTDN: 3.441 LF(ENTRE STE) / 40 - 67 TREES MINNUM UNDERSTDRY TREE IN ADDITION TO OVERSTDRY TREE REOUWEYENT. AND SHRUB FUU COMPLEMENT OF UMDESTORY TREES AND SHRUBS. MINNUM TREE 517E TRFC TYPE OEIDOLM!LIe OONREROUS PFTRHZNTAGE FOR 24'4 BLDG MT.: EMMENTAL 10'- CAL 5'- MT. 5X 0,00 COd'LWENTARY 15'+ CAL 6'+ M. 25X ACCENT 15'+ CAL C+ MT. 25X PR MARY 4.5'+ "" 10'+ HT. 201E QPERENNALS FULL 55'. CAL. 12'4 MT. 202 TREE ROOT AND SPECIES: BALL d BURLAP/SPADED AND NIX MAXIMUM OF ONE TYPE SCRI CHUG: TRASH / SERVICE AREA - W -10' MEIGHT PARKING - C -tU HECHT EXISTING TREE CREDO: EXISTING TREES THAT MEET THE SAYE STYE REQIDIEYEMT WAY 2' CAL.9B OFFSET THE NUMBER D REMRED, CASTING TREE SNMART EXISTING TREM . 136 RSC N SAVED TREES . 52 Y CAL BB - 21 OVERSTOIT(NLL) - 26 UNDERSTORT ORNA EMN(CNN@NTAL) - 32 EVERGREEN(FULL) REMOVED TREES - 73 EVENESIII - 16 ONFSTONT(NLL) WS OR - B UNDENSTORY ORNAIENTAL(ONAMEMAL) FULL MT B - 33 EVEROEENOMW TREES PROVIDED TOTAL TREES - 132 (50 PROPOSED + 62 SAVED) PROVIDED TREES - 50 FULL - - W OYERSIORT (2.5' CAL) - 15 UNDERSTORY (LO' CAL) - 26 EVERGREEN (B' HT.) Land —pa Legend ELSTNG EXSRNG TO R E-- PROPOSED SIZE COMMENT 0 0 OEW S SMAGE REE SIVYI• Han•NearM / GMIt•b Nlonnwn M•m,M SP:M4 0 0 GE--, —A--- RE ABU 05 y i �{C CO GU- MEE 0,00 SHRUBS QPERENNALS 15 MSS 04 .11• SPV• S— a—.. P 111e Wt. SPiw ,. • EDGER ORNAMENTAL GRASSES ® Mm4s 2' CAL.9B SURE STEM. NLL FCOBBLESTONES RSC N Rw BPI—, Ow /Vol•• Tw SPI -RIV Y CAL BB BOULDERS CONCRETE PRINTER Call 48 HwrW Dente alggt g: I GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin CRY Am 637 -454 -0002 NIL TM Fws 1 -WO- 252 -1100 TYPE TOTAL CODE OTY. COMMON/BOTANICAL NAME SIZE COMMENT OVERSTOTY W SLAP 04 SIVYI• Han•NearM / GMIt•b Nlonnwn M•m,M SP:M4 CAL BY SNCLE_51EM NLL ABU 05 Autumn Blow Mwb / M. • NeemeNl Je11ae R N, 2.5' CAL. AR 9NLTE STEM. NLL ORNAMENTAL 15 MSS 04 .11• SPV• S— a—.. P 111e Wt. SPiw 1 NT. BB 0.UYP m 05 PInA SPlrw Cwe / YMUe PLIL Spy" 2' CAL.9B SURE STEM. NLL RSC N Rw BPI—, Ow /Vol•• Tw SPI -RIV Y CAL BB "cLE STEM. FULL EVENESIII 26 WS OR B.CY FULL MT B 07 FULL - MP Ds AuNNen Pna PNUe nlao Y -tO MT. BB NLL_ N. 07 N—, Pln• / Rnu rabew B' -10' HT. BB NLL SMa1SS -- INA GO TNMny AROMIee / lnub aAllenitl4 eENn 45 MT.. /) CONT UROCHT dA 00 CHw 1 Amur Y • wit. Can slum - 01(L % D.- —E! Lllw 5 In m• I PWIeW 4' M T - MY W Tountw Yn 7— • m•Pb Tauntm 24' SPRp CDNT - SCJ 00 S—ft Jun .MM wbbe —.1. 15 CONT - CAR GO CnPMee M, Row R ..... 'Cnana At—III' (E. W.. SWw ) 12 CONT PERENNIALS -- FI.F W Fleece Flo•a FMbPIP beanlw 24' MT.. A CONi - SOD m St•Ma O Qe OeVOY Man —w 'StOl E4 Do ]-TEAR. R CONT - AJS ON Autumn Joy SeEUm / SeMn • Autumn Jo 2 -YEAR. R CONT - PERENNIALS -- lB5 00 Ut U• Suaelam Gmn SUISOMmV,m •�^ — Cerro 2 -YEAR. RCONK - RFO m Red Flan° One / YlfeelQUe ebmeie 'PUreurmeen 2 -YOM. 11 CONK - WG DO KW F—W Wow / W-1, • eeutlflaa 2 -YEAR. R CONT NOTE OUMTMES ON PLAN SUPERSEDE UST GUMTITES IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY. Centennial Lakes Plaza, LLC \ Mid- America Real Estate- Minnesota, LLC I I Bw Wayrm Bma.. , slaw 650 La.mpolw, IEEImmw 8506 X E So' 100' 150' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2.1.1—A" Dm 10/29/10 Q_ 12 W 7 Whole Foods Unammpe Pbn I Bans, mw—ft J F ICI , ,I 1 „I III m z 0 m m z c m cn 0 c m l PARKLAWN AVENUE WE allm- s NOT FOR MNSTRUMON Centennial TAk— Plana, LLC \ Mid - America Real Estate- Mbmeeota, LLC YI � un1..L ti W .......... R,STINC S[ORABLE THOvcvn L c FURNITURE z C T D�� Whole Foods �L�aiww rae. � Planning Commission December 1, 2010 2010.0007.10a Final Development Plan Bruce Carlson /Centennial Lakes/Whole Foods 7401 France Avenue, Edina Planner Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission that Bruce Carlson, on behalf of Centennial Lakes Plaza is requesting to tear down 35,331 square feet of retail space currently occupied by Storables and Thomasville Furniture to build a new 36,346 square foot Whole Foods grocery store. The property is located at 7401 France Avenue. The request requires a Final Development Plan. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council approve the Final Development Plan at 7401 France for a new Whole Foods Store. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Final Development Plan. 2. Westwood Professional Services conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. Approval of the Final Development Plan is also subject to the following conditions: Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped October 29, 2010. • Grading plan date stamped October 29, 2010. • Landscaping plan date stamped October 29, 2010. • Building elevations date stamped October 29, 2010. Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 6. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated November 19, 2010. Appearing for the Applicant Bruce Carlson, Dan Backstrom, Kathy Anderson, Dan Park and Dick Wolberding Discussion /Questions Commissioner Forrest asked Planner Teague if extending the sidewalk is a condition of approval. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Risser noted that on this project there appears to be no comments on the proposed use. Planner Teague agreed, adding that a grocery store is a permitted use in the Mixed Development District. Applicant Presentation Mr. Carlson introduced the development team for Whole Foods and informed the Commission the Centennial Lakes Plaza retail buildings were constructed in the late 1980's. He explained that the lease for Storables expires soon and Thomasville Furniture is currently on a month to month lease. Continuing, Carlson said the development team began working on this project in July of 2011, appeared before the Transportation Commission on November 18th, (approval received) and held a neighborhood meeting on November 2P- Carlson said if the approval and the process proceeds as scheduled construction would commence in March of 2011 with completion sometime in November 2011. Mr. Carlson stated that Whole Foods is not seeking any variances or special considerations; the new building, as proposed, meets all zoning requirements. With graphics Carlson gave an overview of the project. Carlson noted that one change to the site is the relocation of the loading dock to the east side of the building along Parklawn Avenue. Concluding, Carlson said with regard to the condition of extending the sidewalk Whole Foods would be agreeable to extend the sidewalk; however, believes the best time to do this would be when the sidewalk connection is made along the entire stretch of France. With graphics Ms. Anderson pointed out the grade differential along Parklawn Avenue, and the landscaping features along the north boundary of the site, noting the entire site is heavily landscaped and additional landscaping would be added. She explained that the sidewalk on the east would extend around the new building and continue to the front door of the store. Anderson said the building materials will consist of brick, stone, precast stone, lime stone, glass, decorative trim to match brick, banding, and a trellis 2 element on the front building wall. Cart storage is in the interior of the building. Public Comment Kim Montgomery, 5300 Evanswood Lane, said as a person who travels from the north that she gains access to the Centennial shops by making a left turn at Parklawn Avenue, adding if she wants to "visit" the south shops from the north she gains access to those shops by proceeding across /through the north lot. Ms. Montgomery said this movement works well because the majority of the parking spaces in the north lot are empty. Motion to close public hearing- Commissioner Grabiel moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; public hearing closed. Discussion Chair Fischer acknowledged that he also cuts through the north lot as previously mentioned by Ms. Montgomery and asked how this movement would be addressed. Ms. Anderson said they don't want to encourage anyone to zigzag across the north parking lot to gain access to the south. She added traffic calming measures would be introduced to encourage a new habit. Commissioner Grabiel stated he agrees that it would be a good idea to discourage crisscross traffic in this area, acknowledging that he had done the same thing. Commissioner Grabiel asked Planner Teague why the Planning Commission is hearing this proposal if the building as proposed meets code and the use is permitted. Planner Teague responded that the Zoning Ordinance requires a public hearing in the form of a Final Development Plan for development and /or redevelopment of all commercial properties. R -1 and R -2 properties are the only zoning classifications exempt. Commissioner Staunton questioned the hesitation on the part of Whole Foods on continuing the sidewalk from the existing sidewalk along France to the main entrance of Centennial Lakes Plaza. Mr. Carlson explained that Whole Foods does not object to extending the sidewalk along the property boundary to the entrance; however, until the sidewalk along France Avenue s contiguous extending the sidewalk only along this section would be a creating "sidewalk to nowhere ". He pointed out contiguous sidewalks are limited along the east side of France Avenue, reiterating their thought was to continue the sidewalk south and the north of the main entrance when sidewalks are extended east of France and along the entire west boundary of the Centennial Lakes Shops. Commissioners agreed that this makes sense, adding knowing where the bus stop was in this area would be important in making a decision on extending the sidewalk. Planner Teague noted that when the City is presented an opportunity (allowed by code) to gain a sidewalk it does. k] The discussion continued with Commissioners raising a question on a condition of approval from the City Engineer on page A 21 "providing landscape islands at the ends of the two outer parking trees ". Commissioners said they need clarification on this point. Planner Teague said he would have this point clarified before the Council meeting. The discussion ensued and focused on the Parklawn entrance /exit to the site and the City Engineers recommendation that the entrance into the site be increased to two lanes. Mr. Parks with graphics explained the movements in and out of the site and noted that in his opinion keeping the entrance similar to what exists with the smaller entrance and island and adding a 3 inch curb designed to accommodate vehicle tire roll- over creates a safer expanse and less confusion on entering the site. Parks said the lager trucks deliver their merchandise before 6:00 am eliminating any congestion or crossover traffic. Commissioners expressed agreement with Mr. Park's comments, adding widening the entrance to two lanes to accommodate delivery-trucks doesn't make sense. In conclusion Commissioners stated they support the project as presented with clarifications before the City Council meeting. MOTION Commissioner Grabiel moved to recommend Final Development Plan approval in accordance with staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. Chair Fischer said from the discussion thus far that he believes three points need to be clarified before the City Council hears the Final Development request. First, further discussion and resolution needs to occur on the sidewalk, acknowledging that it is important to know where the bus stop is located for northbound travelers; second, the turning movement into the site, two lanes or one; the City Engineer is recommending double lanes in and out; and Commissioners are hesitant to agree; and third, clarify the landscape island(s) as previously mentioned. Commissioner's Gabriel and Scherer agreed that the comments from Chair Fischer should be included in the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. 4 w9tN�1f� PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague December 1, 2010 2010- 007.10a Director of Planning INFORMATION /BACKGROUND Bruce Carlson, on behalf of the Centennial Lakes Plaza is requesting to tear down 35,331 square feet of retail space currently occupied by Storables and Thomasville Furniture to build a new 36,346 square foot Whole Foods grocery store. The property is located at 7401 France Avenue. (See location on pages Al —A5, and the narrative and plans on pages A6 —A20.) The request requires a Final Development Plan. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: A six -story office building; zoned and guided mixed use. Easterly: Centennial Lakes Plaza retail space & Centennial Lakes Park; zoned and guided mixed use. Southerly: Centennial Lakes Plaza retail space; zoned and guided mixed use. Westerly: A two -story office building; zoned and guided office /residential. Existing Site Features The subject property is 6.4 acres in size and contains retail buildings as part of the Centennial Lakes Plaza, and a two -level parking deck. The site is relatively flat. (See pages A2 —A3.) Planning Guide Plan designation: Mixed Use Zoning: MDD -6, Mixed Development District Final Development Plan Review Section 850.04.Subd. 2.5, requires the City Council to make the following findings for approval of a Final Development Plan: a) is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for mixed use, which allows retail uses. The proposed grocery store is a permitted use within the MDD -6 zoning district, which this property is zoned. The new building would be located in the same general footprint of the existing retail building. b) is consistent with the Preliminary Development Plan as approved and modified by the Council and contains the Council imposed conditions to the extent the conditions can be complied with by the Final Development Plan; A Preliminary Development Plan is only required for a property requested to be rezoned. No rezoning is requested. The plan is consistent with the previously approved Overall Development Plan for the site, which included the existing retail building. (See Overall Development Plan on page A5.) c) will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract; The single -story grocery store would be consistent with the existing single - story retail building, and would not alter the character of the neighborhood. d) will not result in an overly - intensive land use; . The new 36,346 square foot grocery store would be slightly larger than the existing 35,331 square foot retail building. e) will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards; Yes. Westwood Professional Services conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. (See traffic study and staff report on pages A23 —A76.) The Edina Transportation Commission met on November 18, 2010, and recommended approval of the traffic study. (See the minutes on pages A21 a —A21 b.) conforms to the provisions of this Section and other applicable provisions of the Code; and As demonstrated in the compliance table on page 4, the proposal conforms to all Zoning Ordinance requirements. g) provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features. Staff believes the proposal would meet this criterion. Grading /Drainage /Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed grading, drainage and utility plans and has provided comment on page A21. All storm water from this site must be treated on -site, as there are no off -site pond expansions available. A Nine Mile Creek Watershed permit would be required prior to issuance of a building permit. Parking Based on the square footage of the existing retail space within the entire Centennial Lakes Plaza development, and the proposed increase in square footage for Whole Foods, 695 parking stalls are required. The existing site provides 899 parking stalls. The revised site plan would provide 901 parking stalls, therefore, the parking requirements would continue to be met. Site Circulation Access to the site, and site circulation would remain the same. (See pages Al4 —A15.) The only change to the site is the location of the loading facilities. Loading The proposed plans would relocate the loading area on the site from the front of the building along France Avenue, to the east side of the building along Parklawn Avenue. (See existing and proposed locations on pages Al4 —A15.) The loading area would be screened from Parklawn with a brick wall that would match the building. (See page Al2.) Additional landscaping is also proposed along Parklawn to screen the loading area from the Parklawn and adjacent property. (See Page A16.) Specific plans showing truck turning movements were submitted on November 23rd. (See pages A77 —A79.) The city engineer will review these plans and provide comment for the Planning Commission on December 1St 3 Building Design The building would be built of brick and stone. (See pages A11 —A13.) The entrance to the store would face the south, generally in the same location as the previous store. Landscaping The landscape plan has been designed to match the previously approved plan, which was part of an overall plan contemplated for the site. (See page A5.) Based on the perimeter of the site, 87 overstory trees are required. That includes the entire Centennial Lakes Plaza site. There would be 140 existing and proposed overstory trees with the tear down and rebuild of Whole Foods. Forty -nine (49) trees would be removed, and 50 trees replanted. (See landscape plan on page A16.) A full complement of understory trees would be planted around the building. Compliance Table 0 City Standard Proposed Front — France 35 feet 35 feet Side Street — Parklawn 35 feet 35 feet Side — South 20 200+ feet Rear — East 35 200+ feet Building Height 4 stories or 1 stories and 28 feet 50 feet, whichever is less Building Coverage 30% 13% Parking lot and drive aisle 20 feet (street) 20 feet (existing) setback Loading Dock 35 feet 35 feet Parking Stalls 695 (overall site) 901 (existing & proposed) Overstory Trees 87 required 140 (50 new trees and (number is based on the 90 existing) perimeter of the entire development site) 0 Primary Issues • Is the proposed development reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for three reasons: 1. The proposed use is permitted in the MDD -6 District. 2. The plans are consistent with the Overall Development Plans for the site. The new Whole Foods store would be located in the same general footprint as the existing retail space. Circulation patterns on the site would remain. 3. The proposal meets all minimum zoning ordinance requirements; therefore, the applicant is entitled the proposed use. • Would the existing roadways support the project? Yes. Westwood Professional Services conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. (See traffic study and staff report pages A23 —A77.) The Edina Transportation Commission met on November 18, 2010, and recommended approval of the traffic study. (See minutes on pages A21 a— A21 b.) Staff Recommendation Recommend that the City Council approve the Final Development Plan at 7401 France for a new Whole Foods Store. Approval is based on the following findings: The proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Final Development Plan. 2. Westwood Professional Services conducted a traffic impact study, and concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. Approval of the Final Development Plan is subject to the following conditions: 1. Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped October 29, 2010. • Grading plan date stamped October 29, 2010. • Landscaping plan date stamped October 29, 2010. • Building elevations date stamped October 29, 2010. • Building materials board as presented at the Planning Commission and City Council meeting. 2. Prior the issuance of a building permit, a final landscape plan must be submitted, subject to staff approval. Additionally, a performance bond, letter -of- credit, or cash deposit must be submitted for one and one -half times the cost amount for completing the required landscaping, screening, or erosion control measures. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The City may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 6. Compliance with the conditions required by the city engineer in his memo dated November 19, 2010. Deadline for a city decision: February 15, 2011 2 City of Edina Logand 7175 7- �► Mouse Number Labels #7750 S"m N.— La hela 4V City Limits Creaks r w 1 ..} J •'., .:'> I Lk. Names 1011, '1111. G1G 7011 .,1119 ► .,,,...eR. L J Lakes 71 1,13 617 JI 07 11j _ Parka 0.1709 601. 707 ❑ Percale 1001.1105 6p7600 701 * .. rtOt 7.1 _ 2009 Aerial Photo 111 , ` ..�• Y * * � .� u:. 1 6r7 9r5 H. 57s7t 911 IpE 71 b� 8Da My 801 9DJ !O7 513 1 boo r, eW 901 100 508 SOI � SDS - f 71/71] T09 TOJ J7T • ',a!er.. Y, 701 JD0s 1 7100 _ J% ' ^'•,^ :: '. ` >t, t. `��wa tip. 7500 119 ,erg: - A. PID: 3202824320399 7401 France Ave S7 'A Edina, MN 55435 4), t `a Ad- ILY� O ` AV 40r t j %6w FRANCE AYES W z u WRANCE AVE 9 7L4 ` w . ii ti 7tl mR i City of Edina 1091161 t )101 tf0 (001 1131112 1/9~� �JO, 7110 7107 3650 - _- 7101 Legend House Number Labels 1/03 -1110 11771/6 • I1� � 303 1277120 121�1ff 'I'1 TS qry 24 Street Name Labele 1237121 fri17f16 71171717! 1 3 ;� City Limits 12071E 130171 77277170 7/217120 /2 11 LU 7Ui 111711( Ins 71217125.1111 f tI 7151 - Creeks 1317130 f'7}71 71/Jd 17 25711! 0 Lake Names 75017700 720} 1100 72077200 71017200 71017207 ( p 0 Lakes 7303 7103720! 7205720/ 7205 T14 7200 7205 f '. LJ Parks 7107 71097208 7307 72087107 71080 1 Zonlnp 7117 7212 7111 7209 7717 )2171216 7115 7250 1730 APO ;AulemaD a VuYn9 Da1ra1 7771 71117310 7300 )110 7215722( 7119 71 MD] -1IM,N Oyrebyn- mnl0dnefl 7211 7 71 1310 300 70 7300 7 111)616 2/ VarYtwn Pp1� ■ YDO SIMw0 Oeleapmem Dwlnn I 73073013130/ 7308 7309 734OUS !7709 0 % 8101 7�5 17 1t�N . MDDe1Mca DOw:pplrcm OwMl 7 '7'1 72ft Jet 801 70.1 ■ PCO-I VannesDpmmcat0- 1 1 =M'2 )3167777 731! 7Jis 7333 fOD2 2< 2/ H6 0 011319 ■ PcOalPannet Gemmpran0avc11 7320 7331T3ri )370 7110 - soe 51] 7]55 KO- ]If�annca Gem.- �ac:al0 arrfl 7321 7780 7777 100 901100 507 ■ 111 )J20111177J87J17 1 •'0i PD0.11Pbnnpa cee,n•:p�..Dd�l 7330 401 7390 t11711 J7 N i0B 1J 71017001 ED ro Rnnea •,du°riO Darnel T107 /780 1250 /700 0 1000 7100 101/07 J07 3100 100 )O1 N 71057/0/1 7/03 710! O fO0.11Pannaa ORlm Dlbal (JDO 7113 Ills, O POOSIthanrd ONm Ownl 1331 (301 1150 6 Nri I7H p 7955 0 /OJ 7(257 <J01 74197431 7/777/381 . ■ PRO - IIPW+wa RlrPeeld OSrcll aR0- 3IPf.rnaaR®aenaeDev.zll WiOa lPannea RecamraiDm.nl Is 7500 0 IIOI 2< ■ PROD I ►unnaaRsaenlWDa.al NJ! )199 75011 7 PRD-51l,'. Rpml .Oienctl N<p N56 to 0 751 ■ P8R- alMm�noa Senor Omr�l N50 IN1 1100 1100 7550 7501 7516 El R- 1 {3n0a Dro":mp untl N56 1157 lao0 b 75 . R- 11DauDb Ore -mp Untl 71 RMD IRe]anY M— O—j 76001 7623 1151 p 3705 2209 76011 7608 Parcels 1175 7600 603 1 7612 "Of 816 1685 0 1107 7620 7611 1715 7631 rsam:al 0 11 77001 7/ 7700 1115 1115 � u 7700 1701 3600 77ae 3700 ays <m..yslci -O�i cc 2103 77]0 N I 6 850 F g 1 PID: 3202824320399 Val Q 7401 France Ave S Edina, MN 55435 Q � �NCtulrora'�� • 111I�u - -s- - - u --,� Li WuIA P—d Pr" D rw�ow w.c ory anti wn •R ° Ali± as �.i„� �z-`� � ��' • r � •` J/!�? ��r..f,!�rji� � '-�y �' � • Y:� :fir r L ro u r • OVE SITE PLAN APPLICANT'S WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUEST FOR NEW WHOLE FOODS AT CENTENNIAL LAKES PLAZA The owner's of Centennial Lakes Plaza at 7401 France Avenue propose to demolish the existing 34,939 square foot building leased by Storables and Thomasville Furniture and construct a custom - built, freestanding, 32,340 square foot building in its place to accommodate a new Whole Foods grocery store. The new Whole Foods building incorporates and compliments existing architecture and proposes new updated landscaping and a new parking surface. The Applicant requests The City of Edina to approve the Application noting that the lease with Storables expires on February 28, 2011 and the tenant has advised landlord of its intent to vacate. Thomasville Furniture has provided the landlord with an option to terminate their lease, effective February 28, 2011. The owner has negotiated and entered into a fully executed new lease with Whole Foods Market Group, Inc. to replace these two vacant spaces. After many space planning sessions, it has been determined that Whole Foods is not able to operate in the existing facility, therefore, it is necessary to replace the existing structure with a new freestanding building. Whole Foods Market, Inc. is the nation's leading natural and organic grocer with over 270 stores in both the US and UK. The first Whole Foods opened in Austin, TX in 1980. Whole Foods will be a great addition to the Edina retail community. The owner of Centennial Lakes Plaza is Centennial Lakes Plaza, LLC, a Virginia limited liability company. TA Associates Realty manages Centennial Lakes Plaza and was established in 1982, and currently is one of the largest and most experienced privately held real estate advisors in the United States. TA Associates Realty is a financially stable landlord with a long -term real estate investment perspective. Current assets under management total approximately 85 million square feet of commercial real estate and 8,000 residential units located in over 35 markets nationwide. The project coordinator for the development is Bruce Carlson of Mid - America Real Estate. Prior to joining Mid - America in June 2010, Mr. Carlson developed 6 grocery anchored shopping centers over an 11 year period with United Properties of Bloomington as Vice President of Retail Development. Mid - America Real Estate is the leading full- service retail real estate organization in the mid -west with offices in Chicago, Milwaukee and Minneapolis. The project architect is Kathy Anderson of Architectural Consortium. Kathy was part of the original design team for Centennial Lakes and has over 25 years of retail design experience with numerous awards and distinctions. Notable projects include the Whole Foods development at Calhoun Commons, Arbor Lakes in Maple Grove, and Silver Lake Village in St. Anthony, The project civil engineer is Westwood Professional Engineers. Their project team includes members who were part of the original design of Centennial Lakes. Westwood was founded in 1972 in Minnesota and is one of Minnesota's leading civil engineering firms. PLANNING DEPARTMENT OCT 29 2010 A CITY OF EDINA Cary Teague From: Bruce D. Carlson <BCarlson @midamericagrp.com> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 1:08 PM To: Cary Teague Cc: Michael Sweatt (MW MWQ; Michael Bashaw (MW MWQ; 'Bianca Tabourn'; Doug Sailor; 'Beth Holmgren'; 'Kathy Anderson'; 'Dan Parks' Subject: Whole Foods Truck Deliveries Hi Cary, See below from Dan Blackburn, Store Manager /Team Leader at Whole Foods. As you can see, deliveries for Whole Foods are off peak. Large deliveries will have little or no impact on customers or traffic at Centennial Lakes Plaza. Whole Foods' focus is on customer service of course. It does not serve Whole Foods well to take deliveries during busy times. Please relay this information to Staff, Planning Commission, and City Council. Thank you Cary! Bruce D. Carlson I Project Director M... MID-AMERICA 5353 Wayzata Boulevard - Suite 650 - Minneapolis, MN 55416 DIRECT. 952 - 563 -6674 1 Cell: 612 - 386 -8544 1 FAX: 952 - 563 -6633 bcarlson(a)midamerica rq_p.com Our Newsletter From: Dan Blackburn (MW CHN) [ mailto : Dan. Blackburn @wholefoods.com] Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 12:48 PM To: Michael Sweatt (MW MWC); Bruce D. Carlson Cc: Michael Bashaw (MW MWC) Subject: RE: Edina Traffic Commision proposal by Whole Foods Hello, I don't have the latest truck pattern movement. However, I think it's important to note that most big deliveries (requiring 53' trailers and possibly a sleeper) will be arriving before 6AM. We can expect to see one or two of these daily. I don't think there are any restriction on the delivery times (if so, I'd like to know). After that is smaller independent, local and /or direct service vendors and they usually arrive in smaller bobtails or mid -size delivery trucks. They include UPS, Fed -Ex, bread vendors etc. All receiving is typically done before 1:00 PM. Daniel J. Blackburn Store Team Leader Lake Calhoun 612- 927 -8141 (fax)612- 929 -0616 Ill'_ v�l 'i- T -. ., .-`Y-- - --Ago a PLA G DEPA: F?TMJPArr, �:�� .. W� w t� -,9i -� � • i sue' d r h L - i Y:4 SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION FACING FRANCE AVE ARCHITECTURAL PREPARED FOR: WHOLE FOODS EXTERIOR RENDERING CENTENNIAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. MD AMERICA -REAL ESTATE LC 991 North 3rd SUeel 612436.4030 5353 WAYZATA BLVD., SUITE 650 /� �. A Minneapolls, MN 55401 Fax 612 -692 -9960 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416 EDINA, MN SCALE: AS NOTED /y 1 Architectural Consortium, LL.C. 2010 r N NORTH ELEVATION FACING PARKLAWN AVE. EAST ELEVATION -� - FlIOlPLf MI°!6t ANlOI ARCHITECTURAL PREPARED FOR: WHOLE FOODS EXTERIOR RENDERING CENTENNIAL LAKES PLAZA, LLC cries~ °J CONSORTIUML.L.C. MID AMERICA -REAL ESTATE M 901 North 3rd Street 612 -436 -4030 5353 E A MINNEAPOLIS, BLVD., SUITE 650 A 3.2 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55076 EDINA, MN SCALE: AS NOTED MNneaD011s, MN 65401 Fax 612. 692.8960 Architectural Consortium, LLC. 2010 PR—D CLE- —9 - TYP � SOUTH ELEVATION e POEEiN19NEU Mn - — - — — - — -- — - — - — - — - -- WIG— AS-0 'IT P-- PaEEwlsa6o Mn @nRTH ILIVA --EAlUM.WNDQW-PR. —. F- =, Dow— I B — .1 s - — ep DEC--MWeOOR AU ------------------- m". ow —1—M Mn e—L—T -\ (� EAST IL-ATM 4 / —A -. � AITECTURAL FP OR ER. PARED WHOLE FOODS CENTENWL �ES PLAZk aC ')ORTIUM L.L.C. MIO "ERI -REAL ESTATE D 3 — ATA BL—, SURE 650 MINNEAPOLIS. MN 58 IN SWI F.. 012. 692 -9880 W EDINA. MINNESOTA PROPOSED EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS� SCALE: AS NOTED I 0 I A 1.1 --] AfcNtoctural Conwrdum, LLC. 2010 Dod pemsjwd SwAcft Ina % FFE -W. 14 CENTENNIAL LAKES PLAZA LLC 7A ......... 7401 FRANCE AVE. S. EDINA, UN 55435 TOTAL BUILDINC G AREA=35,331 Sr cr, ill "2 FTC GARAGE DOOR -84J 88 rFC �846.88,1 I j. Sk % ?04G Z! .. \J., al Lo PID NO. 3V- Q28- 11=3 -0399 6S CC) N J 6 sp�cEs 7 I SPACES I $p�c� ES 3 2 S 510.00 " vs S -S N89'IV59"E . ... ... ... - - - - - - -- -- -7 6 Ac PACES 13i SPACES 9 g -4 L L. .. . . ........ .. 7 LOT-1; -2 PID NO. Si--Oi - -32- 0440 „ . ...... . c I ......... .. Sf-- Centennial Lakes Plaza, LLC Mid -Am —NN A w um P 110 Westwood Pro /otlond s.MCn me ,. —r ws6Mlr+a�r. ��� UY� -- lWr nl! PIC,Y[d to= ' — Centennial Lakes Plaza, LLC \ Mid -, �. �., o,. .rood — .. —..«� lowm twee-- 11" — — I ... � . ,... ,I � s� i S 010 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. KEEP TREES REMOI INDUIRE IKTN OTY AND ARRP£RS REPLACE WIN ENTRY PLANHAQ ADJACENT PROPERTY BOUID£RS� LITTLE BLUE BOULDERS RED FLAME STEM GRASS, KARL . ORNER ABOUT AIATCYONC FOERSTER GRASS. gqTE1LA CRASS AUTUMN JOY DULEVARO PLANTINGS D£ ORO DA nL,L AND _ YS A ORO AUTUMN JOY -5ED(W ,C _ - 1TJ1 ti gIiRGREEN _ '" 'TREES AND r ' >` fDER'T£ Al ASS ` ,.. _.. ' -- >... . . 2 ' Ln]'WAYENT 90iC .......... REPLACE WIN TFOWY .. KEEP P"NnNGS PARKLAWN AVENUE . l�s ARBORNTAE �, � REAfOYE 57LRU85 ADD r j1 \ + .. -r te - -. . , 9 a. i•_; 'c .� :, ''''''t• •. GRASS RED F AW FOERSTER CRASS BTDLDIIRG NO41N AND HEST• Faso AUTUMN BLA2E MAq•E, MR hE n m € i i 9iRE BWCLL EYlRCTEEN TREES [`•.1 TECNNY ARSDRNTAE, COMPACT t AMUR MAPLE; DWARF KOREAN • LILAC; AND RED FLAME GRASS n WHOLE FOODS MARKET 32.340 SF FF 846.0 I BUILOL4G SOU IN ANID EAST.• `'= �• j . c CONCRETE RANTERS WIN m ANNUALS V;*✓1 Z s> j 1 aanmids ercaw` m OA�J CO�MESTONET TAUT ON (a REMOW SHRUBS A .: '_ )EIK AND ANNUALS • • COBBLESTONES 'BDILDER$,'. . . AND KARL FOENSTER'GRAS$ NO PER - `- •: FRANCE BOULEVARD: PAST RAL KEEP REMOIELWDFN DAM ADD.FLEECEFLONER� - .•. :..e.',.'I . TREES ADD 71HC • • TO FILL' IN, CARS.•Pw SL '•. - STAIR P(�OFTER! LDfR� KARL FiEM WSTE'1L CRASS KEEP o • e COBLESTONE'S AND UMN ALA EDUM, OW ALGA IN i .. STELLA DE ORO DA n,A. Y J ST. Of WPO eArtA.r ': AAD � f .. - S A .... AABS 70NFSi . t STELLA D£ ADD BOIA.DER�AND COBBLESTONES O DA U Y KARL FOERSTEAI EN i PARK NiR)`: <w..,:,. .. .,..,... ,.. ` CRABS SSAVG MOAMENT SIGTh i _ . . K . • -�� K. "ROSES ADD L7R . LOGTTONS ' KEEP RANTNG7� .App IELRNY .. ,,, _:. - -..... .. ... .. ... .. ;'� FBOULEVARD ' ARB014NTAE: "'. ..... .. � ' w. 1 ... ENTRr SIDES REMON:. ENTRY SnxT EVERGREEN !REFS AND �. .:.�::.... N ,`•...ST41R PLANTER: _ i ? c ... .'r .. • • ALLRDBS ADDAX - ALL. 9"S ADD • e ' i ... BOULDER$. COBBLE57ON£$yy • • NONE. OCUST. TREES AND . - STE SDE pRSp OA KAY .. -- PFAK SINN DUBS KARL' • RED AAYf:.CRASS / I VERSTER-4GRASS, SCANDIA ' .... .. AINB'ER....STELLA DE LRO. ...... . KEEP .. (1 -... .... DA YLKY AND AURUMN.. JOY .....` ... ;y. € - DA nX ..: 9RRUBS ADD Plylt;, A :' SIRE CR BS AND .:.... EkLS77NC 7' FIl47R BERN FLfECEFLOWER SHRUBS TO ....;:' -T0 RENAW k ....... . -:FXCLV CAPS ' ...- SFDS AT PARKING e STRUCTURE, - Ia ANOo FRANCE BIXl_LFVAR@J 1 - ..... NO unrATION PER...... .. REMOW SHRUBS :ADD' KEEP GRAB TREES: - .'. PAST STRUCTURAL COBBLESTONES, BDU:D£RS:' : :�T • MODIFY LIf c" BED ... DAMAGE ... .. O:RSTER CRASS TO SOI /ARE ! ........ ......... ,; I ' D KARL F 1 _.. • '' &' BELDIr T . • -... BLESrcwis � aurlw .. -... ......._.... YEW, AND ANNUALS s T y� BU/LO/NG PLAN7TNGS ` f. 1 ' il. REMOM SHRUBS ADO / BOULDERS RED FUME t( CUSS AND KARL FOERSTER GRASS .. & BU TIN' / KEEP SPRUCE TREES ADD'.. .. ..- - . _ BOWAER; COMPACT AMIDL r EVE T£CORNY AR80RNTA& DWARF TREES - Qe KOREAN LILAC, RED FLAME ENTRY ISLANDS CRASS, KARL FOERSTER GRASS • KEEP TREES REMOIE . STELLA DE C4P0 04tt0. Y, AND 91RUUBS ADD RFD FLAME/ AUTUMN JOY SEVm GRASS. KARL FOERSTER C o�Op. �'v STET O DE LS DAri2� JOY PLAN TING.T ,.. • ... - REMOYF 91A1/85 ADD BOULDERS RED ftAME ,� .. •2010 NRRI-RRD w-1 W O 5-rvl-" W- KEEP REYOMC UGLYE In In Orr AAV AANPENS 1EPLA17 NM AGNONi PRIG SC ADOM LITRE DUE dMY PLINiNG BORDERS RED !LANE ON ER ABOUT MAfOLNG SPEY QfAGra KARL . rumSTCR GRASS SFELLA GRASS AU Arr uvo VARD PLAN7N05 OF GIRO DAriL X'' a:Arur AUnAfV.10MI/N '• .. •- "• •' _ . • .� . ; • ::: 1[TLE�1�M�QNA7L .�•N �. ..r •MALES AID � ... .-.... _... `a S rREEs 0"' "' - - -.. __.__... - ..... _.._-= 1..;•.. '•. •; i. BLOGOLW Ssr KN m -• PAMQAWN AVENUE i `0r9�� REPLACE M IFONr ARBGRNTAF 7N&= ADD Datums o�� RS RID FLANS s GRASS '��� '.`.- GRASS ArD KARL FDLRSTEA GRASS 1 BALONI^ NMM IM KESP. uvs'', YAPLE NUT[ FK '`t . 1 :.1.1 ' SERF VANS Flt ALE. CC1 TREES E CX APLE . •'T DI A" DOSE KOREAN AMA MAPLE DOW KO .. R US uAG AFD RED MYE DR.155 �I WHOLE FOODS MARKET .i 32.M SF ..:� FF SABL . Z ; C SWIM AND EAST.' EiE IUNL£RS NM (] M y�r ,_,•�;...{ D .o ..r � .rte- C / KEEP MFRS ADD M '�� ROVOIE AD �.•• "'. _ O. COMIXESICIMES -:"r MEW AAMK/45rAU n7Y IIO y COMBLESTOWS .Arm X401L , rOENSfER ceASS , I I o NO PER -. `'� PAST GRABS AND.gOU$A•. ,:,•.:.: > ` { RFY01£ WDFN ADD FLECCX DMN 9MUS& " M REFS ADD BOULDER_[ KARL TIN[ ro FSL N, OAPS,ON 3d{ STAIR a;aTER: /'OF%FEA O S SE KRP CO6IESTOICS AND AUILTYN �17Y OIL[ : SIA BE OLD DAn6Y AND 57E�LA OE DRO D[ FE '\ CRABS . i - as SIEELA DE AM AAV BE 4 GA., KARL FEERS MEN PARK ALL MAIIIJ�­& ,:ROSS ._ ..' LOCARONS AN KARL .: ' i._.. ....... _ —. _ ' . � s,;. .. ...,., - ' � BODC76 ArD KARL ... _ _._ -.... - rOBaRR OLI.4 N 'KEEP PLANTRK:S .. ... ADD rmNr —.::. BOA£L'A/m REYOK d7RI soES Rpm!!'.', `tea ...,! .. .. ,.. ESFAOCLY TREES AND E1t77GAEEr/ TREES AID STAIR PLANTER �L ALL SIgDBS ADD ArN ALL LRDE �POBBI�i'SR11:E$ NOEn0pW. ntMS AND �(-�� \ \y�g}Ell.f`pE VAnjr PM SPIRE OMRS KARL RED FLAW GYASi J F'OCpSRA :lASS SLIDER •.� ANM, SELLA OF ORO - ... SDPw DED: r , r SEDUM. .... = � M:Q NS BY PRAL, 'FLEECFFLORER 9AR.B F EDoalrranw PEa .raL w raps j F PA BMA RKFX F % . PARM\C MANOC. FRANCE IIOII NARK I N mr. REYON! SYKATS :'AOp - 1 KEEP GRAD FREES PAST STRUCTURAL COVI ESroNES BOIADERS NOOFr Aaal BED ... OAYAGL ... AND AM F/7EMM MUSS .. TO SCVARr ...- PI AIR KEEP _ CLK ANVIGES; LUTE - Arm 1LIf/ALS ' NJ. REMOW SNAUBS BDLALERS Rm fLAIIE _ A J //! RIFF.. - -tlJl KEEP SrmIGE PACT Am 9 BDLADLAS CRUAF AMR[ :..: fEONr LLAC EV ORAL d1AY 91ADS KOREAN ILA[. VR W?( . �`L`' �, I'��.. �, O RO OIA55. KARL FiFRSFW SASS - KEEP FREES REYOK SAES OE D FD RD DAnLr A - SIMURS ADD RID FLAME or SEKN. d�T GRASS KARL rOEASTA ♦. GRASS: AunaN AY 0 `I p oq E STELA DE oR0 Ln C.' 4 AND ANNALS ED ..: MNO11Kl AIM s U RCYOIE 9dilEDS A00 BdOiO[RS K1 i�AW .FQMill. ._PZ!?f- ....._.,.. .....:'_:.._. MO LWENf sae KEEP PLANRNG.S • ..� RLAOM OWLAX TRgs ADD NRFEISAR[ �'N. BLO.QLWQ,5747% Em ism 76TH -9 EET - MATCH NTH Orr ADMIT r" `•. PLANTNGSDIIr WRILN REY01E A3ECOK TREES . DEEP REST. RESOLE s . ANPOti WILAQ NM 57M� G u KARL BLUE FD0LS7ER QU= ST1U DOMOE S RED FLAIL .. DE DRD DA nAr AND ORASS AUnAVF.Dr •. AURAS ur SE" SOME STEW DE WO .. DA"r. AND ANNUALS "• rr ®rr.rr D `r . ~,��"Dae'^' - --- - - -J"f °`r p P�ep°'A !� �•• Centennial Lakea Plaza, LLC _ I a BASS W." wesLwood �.e...� s. "� aL�,r. 2sa � .md prafasdwd SwvlcM Im WHOLE FOODS MARKS 32,340 SF FF 846.0 60 60 r Z-Z Z.� WMCOlIftET PROTECTMI Ulf! it. . . . ...... . . .. .... — . ......... . ......... .. ..... .. .. . . IX tt DZUNG BUILONG 'ye . .. . ...... r to Centennial Ulm Plaza, LLC \ Mid Am SAS W".ft &.I-" ftft m hu....ft aft Smk9r4 Inc f1Z .. ....... ......... . W �Z . . .. . ..... .. ST MN-52 SAN ioi-1 I ii .�r c:JTa5&`SER"%0I`CE"S SERVICE WATIICAIN I —Y.F4 LE-a4Z20 LOADING DOW GREASE TRAP R 1152.2 (SZE TaD) Ce _53 ID So WHOLE FOODS MARKET 32,340 SF FF 846.0 . ........ CEI MN-58 A FDC ST M� 56 D UNDEM ROUP', -GTGR* 4NJA I SEE DE 1AL V1WC0 INLET LET PROTECTION 00 TECTIINON X" Ex co . .... ...... ..... .... . . ... u-L� L 0- d Z-Z 16' ..... ... ..... V------- L4 li ...... ..... EF Centennial Lakes Plaza, LLC \ hhd Amenca Ree mo Wqnft Bmm-4 Sww 60 IfIr ... ft 55" OFFICE AREA ,1- 3,352 SF I 2 81156 PRLlIMDNAftY MFSWIDNE FLOUR PIAN / / / 577020 F IL__________ -- I PREP. AREA ` — — I i I I I , I SALES FLOOR ♦/- 20,000 SF II PREP.AREA , , H -1,718 SF ' I I I I I I tl I I WHOLE FOODS MA� KET I I I i I I II 33,340 SF I I ; I I I 200'•IT I I I - - -- ------ - - - - -- T ------ - - - - -- I 1 DINNING AR" / -1,M7 SF I I __J I ACr• , - �- — —- ----------- - — - --f- —I o O 1 BASIC PRF11MM1ARY 11APN FlWRRAN ARCHITECTURAL FIR/ WHOLEFOODS PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN CONSORTIUM L.L.C. CwITIEWCL LAKES LLC R REAL ESTATE 5353 WAYZATA BLVD.. SMITE 65D SCALE: AS NOTED /� e� A 2A 901N.lh31d BDM 812J3B4030 Mh —pDb. MN 554D1 Fm512 =9bBM50 _ MDNNEAP". MN 55115 EDINA. MINNESOTA AIWt9dunil ConmNun6 L.L.C. 2010 ts,9i�11.�, k `2, co �y MEMORANDUM — Plan Review ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA DATE: November 19, 2010 TO: Cary Teague — City Planner FROM: Wayne Houle — Director of Public Works / City Engineer SUBJECT: Centennial Lakes Plaza — Whole Foods 7401 France Avenue South Engineering has reviewed the plans for the above stated project and offer the following comments: O The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) has accepted the Traffic Impact Study, see attached Traffic Impact Study and draft minutes. • A Ninemile Creek Watershed permit will be required. • All storm water from this site shall be treated on -site; no off -site pond expansions are available within the sub - drainage area. Sheet — C1: 1. Provide landscape islands at the ends of the two outer parking trees. 2. Provide a five -foot boulevard style sidewalk along France Avenue from the existing sidewalk to the main entrance of Centennial Lakes Plaza. This is the first review of these plans. Staff will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this first review. Thanks GAEngineering \General\F Streets \7401 n 7501 Centennial Lakes Plaza \Whole Foods\20101119 review of 7401 France Avenue South Whole Foods.docx hat As ' tant city engineer Sullivan said staff will be reporting to the Council and ,t TC in late Decerhker regarding this topic and also including information on what is ha ning in St. Louis Park with heir rail line. VI. New Bu§lhess a. Richfield ffic Control Request City of Richfield's city ON' eer Jeff Pearson, said t city of Richfield is requesting permission to install stop signs at 75t erxes and York T ace & Xerxes because of the new bike lanes and also because of their new sign pol' that calls for stop signs on north /south avenues. Mr. Sullivan explained that the req was denied for lack of warrants recommendation. / s first presented to the Traffic Safety Committee but Council asked that the ETC review and make a During discussion, staff as asked if this was a 000 their stop sign polic , he bike lanes and trail syst Commissioner S roeder noted that the stop sign po and pedestria and should be adjusted to include thei dea: and Mr. Sullivan said considering flat this would `be :,a positive measure. jr has no accommodation for bicycles Commi loner Nelson motioned to approve the request as ag,rwas seconded by Commissioner White. bsented by the city'of Richfield b. Whole Foods Transportation Study. Assistant city engineer Sullivan said developers are proposing to tear down the 35,000 sq. ft. building at 7401 France Avenue and replace it•with-.a.32,000.sq. ft. building with similar foot prints to house Whole Foods, ,a grocery store. Mr. Sullivan said the traffic study.,,objectives ` we'e to 1) document traffic operations under existing operating conditions; 2) assess future,traffic conditions if the project does not proceed; 3) analyze future �pe 'iations if the .,redevelopm'e:ht proceeds as planned; and 4) assess the impact of the redevelopment and.;,recommend mitigation measures if needed; and they were asked to look at the following..iritersection's: ;France'Avenue at Parklawn, Plaza Drive, and 76tH Street; Parklawn. Avenue at Centennial Lakes; 76th Street at Centennial Lakes; and two Plaza Drive internal intersections. Mr. Sullivan said the study analysis..shows the following: reconstruction will add 2100 daily trips with 145. trips in the PM`peak hour>•and 133 in the Saturday peak hour; intersections will operate at. acceptable level " of service C or better; however, some measurements are at E; access locations to remain' the same; and no improvements to the local street network are recommended.'-,. Additionally' 'he said a new sidewalk with a crosswalk and bike racks are included in the project and that the store is along Metro Transit's route 6 bus line. Mr. Sullivan said staff recommends approval and asked that the ETC "adopt a motion recommending that the traffic as demonstrated in the transportation study for Whole foods — Centennial Lakes does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation system." Discussion ensued and Commissioner Nelson asked if the construction to the north was taken into consideration. Mr. Sullivan said yes, and that the developers' traffic consultant was given a computerized base model to use to do their traffic study. 2 Aik Commissioner Bonneville noted that the access on Plaza Drive that connects the adjoining parking lots is below grade and unsafe. He suggested stop signs to make it safer. Mr. Sullivan said site circulation will be reviewed by City Engineer Houle and the Planning Commission. Commissioner Bonneville also said he believes vehicles will stack on Parklawn Avenue. Nick Erpelding with Westwood Professional Services, said majority of traffic is expected to access from Parklawn Avenue and they reviewed cueing on Parklawn and found no adverse effects from vehicles passing through the intersection. Commissioner Janovy said she is concerned that the north entrance I,will be used by delivery trucks and customers and asked if there will be a conflict. Mr: -, Bruce Carlson, development director with Mid - America Real Estate, said they have gone over,truck movements many times and feel that they have a good design. He said most del iveries:viillbe, in the mornings and will be minimal at 4 -5 per day. Commissioner Bonneville said the nose of the centei median on ParklaWh'Avenue will need to be cut back for trucks to make left turns. Mr. Sullivan 'said staff questioned this earlier on but all of the templates that they've looked at show "' " ks will be :-able to maneuver.. around the median and the issue can be revisited if needed.': eeded : -` Commissioner Schroeder asked if they..., -took into accdunt -the number of drivers going south who may leave to the north thereby "creating -more traffic:; on -_ Parklawn Avenue instead of W. 76t" Street. Mr. Erpelding said they did fake this: into accournt :and they did factor in most of the traffic exiting via Parklawn Avenue. Commissioner Bonneville inquired about parking ratio and: Mr :Sullivan said parking review will be looked at by the Plap"J Commission ti - Commissioner Schroeder motioned" "that the`Araffic as demonstrated in the [traffic impact analysis] for Whole Foods Cenntenial Lakes ...does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation system." The motion was seconded by Commissioner Nelson. Aye: Schroeder, White, Janovy; Nelson, Workinger Nay: B.on:neville Motion:carried. plete Street -;Jack Bror Mr. Sullivari''in- uced Jack; Broz with Howard R. Green. He said Mr. represents one of many companies. t have.:been working on developing Comple reets which is now state statute and th4:: after : +✓'., City Engineers Association of mnesota winter conference in January, staff will have, ing more defined to pres Mr. Broz said he is a 6ansportatio ngine nd most recently he has been participating in the MN Complete Streets Coalition, an isory group formed by Mn /DOT. Mr. Broz showed a video that was taped on Market S et, Sa rancisco, in 1906, showing cars, trains, bikers, pedestrians and horse and bu es all using th ame street and no traffic jam. He said traffic is about travel, circulation d access and also abou obility not speed. Mr. Broz talked out the historical perspective of the interstaW system and how it has shaped the future. said the mission of the interstate system was to ve faster and most design standar ave followed this pattern of wider, faster, flatter, straighte , d cost was not an Page 1 of 1 Edina Transportation Commission Item VI.B. REGULAR TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Transportation Commission From: Jack Sullivan, PE Assistant City Engineer Date: November 18, 2010 Subject: Whole Foods — Transportation Impact Analysis; Centennial Lakes Recommendation: Agenda Item No.: VI.B ACTION: ® Recommendation /Motion ® Discussion ❑ Information Review the attached transportation impact analysis submitted by Westwood Professional Services on November 10, 2010. Include for review are memos from WSB and Associates, dated November 4th /10th, 2010, memos from Westwood Professional Services dated November 8th /10th and the following staff report. Staff and WSB have reviewed the Transportation Impact Analysis and subsequent memos, from Westwood Professional Services for the Whole Food store in Centennial Lakes dated November 10, 2010, and believe the development team has met the requirements of the City's Transportation Impact Analysis. If so desired by the Transportation Commission, adopt a motion recommending that the traffic as demonstrated in the transportation study for Whole Foods- Centennial Lakes does not adversely affect to the adjacent transportation system. Info /Background: The Development Team is proposing to raze the Storables and Thomasville Furniture stores, which account for approximately 35,000 square feet of retail, and build a 32,000 square foot Whole Foods Grocery store northwest corner of the Centennial Lakes Shopping Center. G:\Engineering\Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Transportation CommissionWgendas\2010 R &R\ 20101 118_Item.VI.B_Who1e_Foods.docx kal Westwood MEMORANDUM Date: November 10, 2010 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 PHONE 952- 937 -5150 FAX 952- 937 -5822 TOLL FREE 888 - 937 -5150 www.westwoodps.com Re: Response to City/WSB Additional Comments on November 8th Whole Foods Draft TIA File 2010 -1178 To: Jack Sullivan, P.E., City of Edina From: Nick Erpelding, P.E., PTOE Jack — In response to the City's additional comments on the November 8h draft of the Whole Foods Traffic Impact Analysis, please find the attached final signed TIA and responses below. Nick 1. One of the comments requested that information on how the peak Saturday hour was determined. The information in the appendix just indicates that traffic counts were conducted on Saturday from 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM. The question is how it was determined that this time frame was the peak period Please verify how this was determined. As noted in our original response, the peak hours studied for the analysis, as agreed with you in our initial scoping meeting on September 16, 2010, were the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday midday peak hour. Counts were conducted from 4:00 -6:00 p.m. on a typical weekday and 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. on a typical Saturday as agreed upon in that meeting. These time periods typically substantially encompass the associated peak hours. The traffic count data collected for this project did show that the Saturday Midday peak hour occurred within this 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. timeframe, from 11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. The traffic count data further showed that traffic volumes are approximately 15% higher during the weekday PM peak hour compared with the Saturday Midday peak hour. Based on ITE data in Trip Generation, 8t' Edition (page 1498, Tables 1 and 2) the maximum variation in hourly shopping center traffic volumes across a typical Saturday from 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. is roughly 4 %. For shopping centers under 300,000 s.f., Land and Energy DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS . 4/�3 November 10, 2010 Page 2 such as Centennial Lakes, the variation is even less. The conclusion that can be drawn from this information is that Weekday PM peak hour remains the critical peak hour for analysis purposes, and the findings from the study remain intact. 2. The actual Synchro and Sim Traffic modeling worksheets are now provided in the appendix. Should the development be approved please submitted electronic copies of these files. Comment noted. The electronic Synchro and SimTraffic modeling files will be - submitted to the City upon development approval. 3. The report now includes a section on Travel Demand Management (TDM) options for the site. The text indicates on page 34 in the Bicycle section that a list of bike racks was included. This information was not shown in the report and should be provided The report references the overall site plan for showing the sidewalk and pedestrian facilities. This is had to follow. A separate map should be provided showing all the existing pedestrian, bike and transit facilities and what will be added as part of the development. Figure 5 -1, a Pedestrian Connectivity Plan has been added to the TIA to more clearly depict existing and proposed pedestrian connections. A potential location for a bicycle rack near the proposed Whole Foods building is called out. A' �V Westwood MEMORANDUM Date: November 8, 2010 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 PHONE 952- 937 -5150 FAX 952- 937 -5822 TOLL FREE 888- 937 -5150 www.westwoodps.com Re: Response to City/WSB comments on October Whole Foods Draft TIA File 2010 -1178 To: Jack Sullivan, P.E., City of Edina From: Nick Erpelding, P.E., PTOE Jack — In response to the City's November 4`h comments, and November 8t' email comment on the October Draft of the Whole Foods Traffic Impact Analysis, please find the attached updated TIA and responses below. Nick 1. We are assuming that the existing land uses are still /or were opened when the traffic counts were conducted. This should be verified The two land uses slated for removal as part of the redevelopment, Storables and Thomasville Furniture, remain in operation today. 2. Traffic counts were conducted during the PM Peak and Saturday Peak hours. How was it determined that the Saturday late AM was the peak period? Two of the tables in the draft TIA (No -Build and Build operational analysis results; Tables 3 -2 and 4 -4) were labeled incorrectly as AM and PM. These tables have been corrected in the attached revised TIA. The peak hours studied for the analysis, as agreed with you in our initial scoping meeting on September 16, 2010, were the weekday PM peak hour and Saturday midday peak hour. As evidenced in the operational analysis results tables in the report, the weekday PM peak hour is the more critical of the two peak hours studied. 3. The operational analysis results shown in the appendix does not include available storage lengths for all approaches at each intersection. This information should be provided Specifically how do the queues on each of the site driveway interact with the traffic in the parking lots? Land and Energy DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS M E M M E N N E E N N E E Aa'5-- November 8, 2010 Page 2 The distance to the first drive aisle at the site driveway intersections has been added to the operational analysis result tables. As shown in these tables (all scenarios) the 95`h percentile queues on these approaches are less than the distance to the first drive aisle. No operational impacts are anticipated. 4. The operational tables in the appendix show a summary of the Synchro and SimTraffic analysis. The actual modeling worksheets should be provided. The complete Synchro and SimTraffic worksheets are now included in the appendix. S. The text indicates historical ADT volumes for France Avenue have been decreasing. What location was this analysis taken at? Is the downward trend consistent throughout the corridor or just at this one location? ADT information available through the MnDOT website indicates that these ADT volumes were collected somewhere south of 69th Street within the City of Edina. Presumably they were collected north of Minnesota Drive. Centennial Lakes is located within this roadway segment. Because further breakdown of the ADT count data on this segment is not available from MnDOT, no conclusions can be drawn as to trends within smaller segments. The attached revised TIA has been updated to better indicate the location of the MnDOT ADT counts. 6. Table 3 -1 shows the estimated traffic generation for the vacant shops within the Centennial Lakes retail center. a. It appears that this table shows the "Net New Trips "from this additional development and Tables 4 -1 and 4 -2 show the "Gross Trips "from the proposed development. These tables should be consistent. b. It is unclear what was used for the analysis, "New trips" or "Driveway trips "? This should be clarified c. Were these trips distributed the same way as the proposed development traffic? These tables have been updated to be consistent with the Tables for Build traffic. Language has been added to the TIA noting that driveway trips, which include new and pass -by trips, were used to develop the Build traffic volumes used in the operational analysis. Infill trips for the No -Build scenario were subject to the same distribution pattern as the trips added under the Build scenario. Due to the location of vacant shops within Centennial Lakes, the assignment patterns for No -Build varied slightly from Build. Appendices B -4, B -5, and B -6 detail these differences. 7. Internal and Pass -by trip reductions were assumed as part of the analysis. These terms should be defined and documented in general in the main report. The details are ok in the appendix. This discussion should also explain why the 2"d addition of the Trip k_Y November 8, 2010 Page 3 Generation Handbook was used for the internal and pass -by trips and the 8"' addition used for the actual generated trips. The following text has been inserted into the revised TIA to clarify the first of these comments: For the purposes of this study, internal trips are trips made from one Centennial Lakes land use to another that do not use the external roadway network. Pass -by trips are made by drivers that are already using the external roadway network, but choose to divert to the site (to pick up some groceries, for example) before continuing on their original route. The paragraphs discussing trip generation have been revised to address the second of these comments as follows: The trip generation rates utilized in this study are based on those documented in Trip Generation, 8th Edition, published by ITE. Trip Generation, 8`" Edition is considered the standard text in the traffic engineering profession for estimating gross trip generation potential. Internal and pass -by trips were estimated using data from ITE's Trip Generation nd Edition, to the extent possible. Trip Generation Handbook. 2'd Handbook. 2 Edition is a companion text to Trip Generation, and is considered the standard text in the traffic engineering profession for estimating internal and pass -by trips. Consistent, conservative assumptions were made where the Handbook data was incomplete. These assumptions were reviewed by City staff prior to initiation of the analysis. Full details are available in the appendix. 8. It appears that all the pass -by trips where assumed going through the Parklawn Avenue intersection. Is this correct? Was this also the same assumption for the infill development? This assumption should be documented in the report. That is not quite correct. The following text was added to address this comment: All pass -by trips were assumed to initiate from France Avenue. The directional split of these trips was based on existing traffic volumes: 50% northbound, 50% southbound for both the weekday PM and Saturday midday peak hours. Pass -by trips were split between the Parklawn, Plaza Drive, and West 7e Street driveways. All trips were primarily assigned to the driveway that provided the shortest trip and/or most direct route. Further details on routing assumptions are available in the appendix. Similar to new trips, pass -by trips were primarily assigned to the driveway most convenient to their intended destination. Because Plaza Drive is limited to right - in/right -out movements only, no southbound pass -by trips were assigned to this driveway. Because Whole Foods, Storables and Thomasville Furniture are situated in the northern half of the site, traffic exiting the site from these uses destined southbound W November 8, 2010 Page 4 was assigned to favor Parklawn over West 76th. For the infill (No- Build) scenario added pass -by trips, because the vacant parcels were distributed more evenly across the site, a more balanced usage of Parklawn and West 76th was assumed. Appendices B -4, B -5, and B -6 detail trip assignment differences among the scenarios. 9. Summaries of the Traffic operation analysis are shown in Tables 2 -1, 3 -2 and 4 -4. . One additional table would be helpful showing the comparison of all three analyses together. In addition, it would be helpful to see not only the overall LOS and delay but each approach and movement in the tables in the main portion of the report. Tables have been added to the body of the report to address both of these comments. 10. Although the report indicates that the queue lengths do not increase significantly. A table showing a comparison of the queue lengths for each operations analysis should be provided in main portion of the report. Tables have been added to the body of the report to address this comment. 11. The report does not address any Travel Demand Management (TDM) options for the site. A discussion on what transit, pedestrian /bike facilities and other TDM strategies are currently in place and what would be included as part of this proposed development needs to be included A chapter has been added to the report to address TDM concerns. The chapter notes existing pedestrian, bike, and transit amenities and provides suggestions for TDM measures that could be adopted to foster continued reductions in peak hour traffic generation by the redeveloped Whole Foods. 12. Follow -up comment received via email on November 8, 2010: Whole Foods Team, It was brought to our attention that there is a discrepancy between the square footage shown in the transportation study and that of the preliminary plan sheet (A2.1). The study has 32,300 and plan sheet has 36,692 (33,340 +3352 in the mezzanine office area. I realize these numbers may seems relatively similar but the additional space can have impacts on the transportation study. Please include in your response a clarification or adjustment of the traffic study. Regards, Jack AJI V November 8, 2010 Page 5 The TIA as published assumes a 32,300 s.f. footprint for Whole Foods. This square footage does not include a 1,000 s.f. heated/cooled cart corral storage area or 3,352 s.f mezzanine office area. The cart corral storage area was considered exterior to the building for the purposes of trip generation. The mezzanine office space, if considered part of.the store for trip generation estimate purposes, would add roughly 30 peak hour trip ends (15 in 15 out). If considered a separatist office use for trip generation purposes, this 3,352 s.f. space would generate less than 10 peak hour trip ends. The ITE rates in Trip Generation are nationwide averages. In reviewing the data plots for land use 850, Supermarket, it is evident that that a change of plus or minus 30 peak hour trips falls well within the error range of this dataset. Added to the fact that operations throughout the study area operate acceptably, this discrepancy does not impact our conclusion that no mitigation is necessary to provide for the safe and efficient movement of traffic associated with the Whole Foods redevelopment. A-)� j Memorandum To: Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer Jack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer City of Edina From: Chuck Rickart, PE, PTOE Transportation Engineer WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: November 10, 2010 Re: Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Final Traffic Impact Analysis Review City of Edina WSB Project No. 1686 -02 We have reviewed the Final Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Westwood for the proposed Whole Foods grocery store at the Centennial Lakes retail center. The Final Report includes addressing the review comments from November 4, 2010. Based on our review of the Final Traffic Impact Analysis the following additional questions and comments should be discussed during the presentation at the Edina Transportation Commission meeting on November 18tH 1. One of the comments requested that information on how the peak Saturday hour was determined. The information in the appendix just indicates that traffic counts were conducted on Saturday from 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM. The question is how it was determined that this time frame was the peak period. Please verify how this was determined. 2. The actual Synchro and SimTraffic modeling worksheets are now provided in the appendix. Should the development be approved please submitted electronic copies of these files. 3. The report now includes a section on Travel Demand Management (TDM) options for the site. The text indicates on page 34 in the Bicycle section that a list of bike racks was included. This information was not shown in the report and should be provided. The report references the overall site plan for showing the sidewalk and pedestrian facilities. This is had to follow. A separate map should be provided showing all the existing pedestrian, bike and transit facilities and what will be added as part of the development. Based on these comments and my review of the Final Traffic Impact Analysis it can be concluded that the Whole Foods proposed development will not have a significant impact on existing or future traffic operations adjacent to the site. It is therefore my recommendation that the Traffic Impact Analysis be approved with the minor clarifications discussed above. J� WSB Infrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South & Associnles, Inc. Suite #300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541 -4800 Fax: 763 541 -1700 Memorandum To: Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer Jack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer City of Edina From: Chuck Rickart, PE, PTOE Transportation Engineer WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: November 10, 2010 Re: Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Final Traffic Impact Analysis Review City of Edina WSB Project No. 1686 -02 We have reviewed the Final Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Westwood for the proposed Whole Foods grocery store at the Centennial Lakes retail center. The Final Report includes addressing the review comments from November 4, 2010. Based on our review of the Final Traffic Impact Analysis the following additional questions and comments should be discussed during the presentation at the Edina Transportation Commission meeting on November 18tH 1. One of the comments requested that information on how the peak Saturday hour was determined. The information in the appendix just indicates that traffic counts were conducted on Saturday from 11:00 AM to 1:00 PM. The question is how it was determined that this time frame was the peak period. Please verify how this was determined. 2. The actual Synchro and SimTraffic modeling worksheets are now provided in the appendix. Should the development be approved please submitted electronic copies of these files. 3. The report now includes a section on Travel Demand Management (TDM) options for the site. The text indicates on page 34 in the Bicycle section that a list of bike racks was included. This information was not shown in the report and should be provided. The report references the overall site plan for showing the sidewalk and pedestrian facilities. This is had to follow. A separate map should be provided showing all the existing pedestrian, bike and transit facilities and what will be added as part of the development. Based on these comments and my review of the Final Traffic Impact Analysis it can be concluded that the Whole Foods proposed development will not have a significant impact on existing or future traffic operations adjacent to the site. It is therefore my recommendation that the Traffic Impact Analysis be approved with the minor clarifications discussed above. J� Prepared For: Prepared By: e �'M DLA1V�ERICA El 11 El 11 El O � •� il� ite:��, �a•r��'rF,.an��rsc•r��; ta,cs ® El � Centennial Lakes Plaza, LLC ® �Jel 8 6 TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Whole Foods Centennial Lakes City of Edina, Minnesota November 10, 2010 Prepared for City of Edina Mid - America Real Estate - Minnesota, LLC Centennial Lakes Plaza, LLC Prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Project No. 20101178 Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page i November 10, 2010 As-a TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Whole Foods Centennial Lakes City of Edina, Minnesota REPORT CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 11/10/2010 Nicholas J. Erpelding, P.E., PT09 Date License No. 44582 Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page ii November 10, 2010 AI�3 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVESUMMARY ..................................................... ............................... A LBACKGROUND .................................................................... ..............................1 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................... ..............................4 TrafficVolumes ....................................................................... ..............................4 Roadway Geometry and Traffic Control ................................... ..............................7 TrafficOperations ................................................................... .............................10 3. NO -BUILD SCENARIO ....................................................... .............................15 TrafficVolumes ...................................................................... .............................15 TrafficOperations ................................................................... .............................19 4. BUILD SCENARIO .............................................................. .............................22 TripGeneration ....................................................................... .............................22 TripDistribution ..................................................................... .............................24 TripAssignment ..................................................................... .............................24 TrafficVolumes ...................................................................... .............................24 TrafficOperations ................................................................... .............................30 5. TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT ............................... .............................34 Pedestrian............................................................................... .............................34 Bicycle.................................................................................. ............................... 34 Transit.................................................................................... .............................36 TDMStrategies ....................................................................... .............................37 6. RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................... .............................38 6. APPENDIX ........................................................................... .............................39 Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page iii November 10, 2010 W F igure 1 -1. Location Map .. Figure 1 -2. Site Plan .......... FIGURES .............................1 Figure 2 -1. 2010 Existing PM Traffic Volumes ......................... ..............................5 Figure 2 -2. 2010 Existing Saturday Traffic Volumes ................. ..............................6 Figure 2 -3. 2010 Existing Lane Geometry ................................. ..............................9 Figure 2 -4. 2010 Existing PM Operational Analysis Detailed Summary ................13 Figure 2 -5. 2010 Existing Saturday Operational Analysis Detailed Summary ........14 Figure 3 -1. France Avenue Historical ADT Volumes ................ .............................15 Figure 3 -2. 2013 No -Build PM Traffic Volumes ....................... .............................17 Figure 3 -3. 2013 No -Build Saturday Traffic Volumes ............... .............................18 Figure 3 -4. 2013 No -Build PM Operational Analysis Detailed Summary ...............20 Figure 3 -5. 2013 No -Build Saturday Operational Analysis Detailed Summary ....... 21 Figure 4 -1. Trip Distribution ..................................................... .............................25 Figure 4 -2. PM Trip Assignment .............................................. .............................26 Figure 4 -3. Saturday Trip Assignment ...................................... .............................27 Figure 4 -4. 2013 Build PM Traffic Volumes ............................. .............................28 Figure 4 -5. 2013 Build Saturday Traffic Volumes ..................... .............................29 Figure 4 -6. 2013 Build PM Operational Analysis Detailed Summary .....................32 Figure 4 -7. 2013 Build Saturday Operational Analysis Detailed Summary .............32 Figure 5 -1. Pedestrian Connectivity Plan .................................. .............................35 Figure 5 -2. Existing Bus Routes and Stops ............................... .............................36 Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page iv November 10, 2010 �3� Table 2 -1. 2010 Existing Traffic Operations ............................ .............................11 Table 3 -1. Trip Generation Estimates — Infill of Centennial Lakes Existing Vacancies — Gross Trips ......................................... .............................16 Table 3 -2. Trip Generation Estimates — Infill of Centennial Lakes Existing Vacancies — Gross, Driveway and Net New Trips ... .............................16 Table 3 -3. 2013 No -Build Traffic Operations .......................... .............................19 Table 4 -1. Trip Generation Estimates — Existing Land Uses to be Removed — Gross Trips....................................................................... .............................22 Table 4 -2. Trip Generation Estimates — Proposed Land Use — Gross Trips ...........22 Table 4 -3. Trip Generation Estimates — Existing Land Uses to be Removed + Proposed Land Use — Gross, Driveway and Net New Trips ..................23 Table 4 -4. 2013 Build Traffic Operations ................................ .............................30 Table 4 -5. Traffic Operations — Three Scenario Comparison ... .............................31 X36 Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page v November 10, 2010 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The proposed Whole Foods redevelopment will result in a net decrease in square footage of approximately 2,700 square feet. The nature of the land use, retail, will remain unchanged. The proposed new land use, a Whole Foods grocery store, is likely to generate more traffic per square foot than the existing land uses (Thomasville Furniture and Storables, a general merchandise retailer). However, the magnitude of this increase is small, at 145 new trip ends (78 in, 67 out) during the weekday PM peak hour and 133 new trip ends (69 in, 64 out) during the Saturday Midday peak hour — roughly one additional car entering and exiting per minute. The City's Synchro /SimTraffic traffic model was calibrated to mirror existing conditions before being used to assess future (2013) traffic conditions. Under existing conditions the model showed that the intersections around the perimeter of the Centennial Lakes shopping center (the "study area ") operate within acceptable thresholds during both the weekday PM peak hour (4:30 to 5:30 p.m.) and Saturday Midday peak hour (11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.). In the future, the model shows that after accounting for potential background growth in area traffic at a rate of 0.5% per year, potential traffic growth associated with infilling of vacancies elsewhere in Centennial Lakes, and additional traffic generated by the proposed Whole Foods redevelopment, traffic operations throughout the study area will remain within acceptable thresholds. No mitigation to accommodate the additional traffic is necessary. k31 Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page vi November 10, 2010 1. BACKGROUND Mid - America Real Estate - Minnesota, LLC and Centennial Lakes Plaza, LLC are proposing to redevelop a portion of the Centennial Lakes retail center in Edina, Minnesota. This site is located on the east side of France Avenue between Parklawn Avenue and West 76th Street. Figure 1 -1 Location Map rar sl W 70P. S W 70r M I I w, om s Yll mn si f a �,s. ® i.•Ienw Rc i � r W TGt^ '17 51 � Rr—< cw:.a. s wrluw urt.ew W761IQ 91 ♦'n+ue GI � � ' I.'Ntile , '4 w:lna H, L W'r7 ^a 51 d t FA'w,ma d a i.1. Ed u.' `•.nn... n.. F.vr P.:e:, a�uw`5. Project L 5 Location t W "oo .4 w Ten m w ree: SA w Ten w i LO 8 a N P_ v J ! 4 W 77I S W ;7'l1 SI y 3r Ieneeeg6 .+ 1 _ `.f✓ j O A- 3 IN, 'N M q yy � i -� "nips` 4 we•.s ,� � � r• W ,,µ�, � � F q Source: Google Maps Centennial Lakes houses an assortment of approximately 30 retail tenants, ranging in size from 1,000 to 30,000 square feet (leasable area) with an overall total square footage of roughly 200,000 s.f. The proposed redevelopment plan calls for the removal of two of the land uses currently in operation: the roughly 25,700 s.f. Storables general merchandise store and the approximately 9,300 s.f. Thomasville furniture store. In their place an approximately 32,300 s.f. Whole Foods grocery store is to be constructed. The resulting change in site square footage will be a net decrease of 2,700 s.f. Construction is to proceed in one phase, with completion in 2012. Whole Foods Centennial Lakes�� Traffic Impact Analysis Page 1 !November 10, 2010 Access to and from the site will remain unchanged. Three accesses currently serve the Centennial lakes site, one each from France Avenue, Parklawn Avenue, and West 76'h Street. The France Avenue access is limited to right - in/right -out movements only by a median along France Avenue, while the remaining two accesses serve all movements. Intersection control at the France Avenue and Parklawn Avenue driveways is side - street stop control, while the West 76th Street driveway is controlled via traffic signal. Plaza Drive, the east/west driveway accessing France Avenue, divides the site roughly in half. Two drive aisles, termed West Site Drive and East Site Drive for the purposes of this study, intersect Plaza Drive, providing access to parking. The concept site plan, Figure 1 -2, details the access locations and site layout in general. The objectives of this study are as follows: 1. Document traffic operations under existing operating conditions. 2. Assess future traffic conditions if the project does not proceed (No -Build scenario). 3. Analyze future operations if the redevelopment proceeds as planned (Build scenario). 4. Assess the impact of the redevelopment and recommend mitigation measures if needed. Working together with City staff, a set of base assumptions for this study was developed. The first base assumption made was to designate 2013 as the future design year for this study to coincide with one year after build -out. Next, the PM and Saturday Midday peak hours were agreed upon as the time periods to be studied, as these are typically the busiest times for retail land uses. The following list of seven intersections was identified as the study area in concert with City staff: • France Avenue and Parklawn Avenue • France Avenue and West 76h Street • Parklawn Avenue and Site Access • West 76th Street and Site Access • France Avenue and Plaza Drive • Plaza Drive and West Site Drive • Plaza Drive and East Site Drive Additional assumptions made in cooperation with City staff are described throughout this report. X31 Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 2 November 10, 2010 Figure 1 -2 Concept Site Plan ' �� OVERALL SITE PARKING DATA �� 194,626 - 12,000 (EDINA MAINT DEDUCT) = 182,626 SF 182,626 - 16,660 (B, C & D STOR. & TOILETS DEDUCT) = 165,966 SF 165,966 -1,500 (A DOCK, STOR. & TOILETS DEDUCT) TOTAL = 164,466 SF OVERALL TOTAL STALLS = 950 OVERALL SITE PARKING RATIO = 5.8/1000 IllUh, u.Mcw i MFeeii40x�iMIJ �e or u... WHOLE FOODS CENTENNIAL LAKES PLAZA EDINA, MN SITE PLAN SCALE: 1' =5W4r A1-J 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS Traffic Volumes Manual PM and Saturday Midday turning movement counts were conducted under Westwood's direction at each of the seven site intersections. On direction received from City staff, the counts were conducted from 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. Wednesday, October 6, and 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. Saturday, October 9, 2010. Based on the data collected, the weekday PM and Saturday midday peak travel hours occur from 4:30 to 5:30 p.m. and 11:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m., respectively. Figures 2 -1 and 2 -2 show the existing peak hour turning movement volumes for the study area. Detailed traffic count information is available in the appendix. Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes, as reported on the Mn/DOT website for year 2009, are as follows: • France Avenue (south of 69h Street, north of 494): 28,500 • Parklawn Avenue (East of Site): 3,500 • West 760' Street (East of Site): 9,100 Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 4 November 10, 2010 W Figure 2 -1 Turning Movement Volumes ZU9U oaf `9 11 Parklawn 04 x-122 00 0) � f--41 72 $q, M ` y (n. U) % Q N N V NN C f6 U- `n r' -15 r'-1 r N It M x'40 co,) X38 -122 21 �, 1 Plaza Dr 25 T 4 T If CO 0) 3--> L N in 46-4 CO 28-:3 17� 0 0 w °! U) a� co w -rm T (D Q (D U C f� u_ Whole Foods Centennial Lakes 10/27/2010 Westwood A a Not to Scale �y U� LO 37 V 78 13 �CV 6 W 76th St 1 80 0� % a r y N� W 76th St T (D Q (D U C f� u_ Whole Foods Centennial Lakes 10/27/2010 Westwood A a Not to Scale Figure 2 -2 60 d I N� 41� 0 (D w U) .. N 0 1i M N "-93 Co cn "3 160 61-� N v (C W 76th St 61-,AI I'o04 M a� Q a� c m U Plaza Dr 25 T 42� m N LL c* c V Q qn l NN �?4 198 �3 7) �0 ^T� Turning Movement Volume: 2010 Existing - Parklawn W 76th St Whole Foods Centennial Lakes 1oiz7/zvlo Westwood 4+3 Not to Scale ti e)0 V-65 y ao M � T X23 22 a � LwoCOS, Y ,vim 87 1 � Parklawn Ave 1�q� N ti ►n 78--,j r' tlN. CO 4o Q n co U NN c c0 L. LL C) �1 O o 46;C ch �dQ 60 d I N� 41� 0 (D w U) .. N 0 1i M N "-93 Co cn "3 160 61-� N v (C W 76th St 61-,AI I'o04 M a� Q a� c m U Plaza Dr 25 T 42� m N LL c* c V Q qn l NN �?4 198 �3 7) �0 ^T� Turning Movement Volume: 2010 Existing - Parklawn W 76th St Whole Foods Centennial Lakes 1oiz7/zvlo Westwood 4+3 Not to Scale Roadway Geometry and Traffic Control Roadway geometry was verified through an inventory conducted October 12, 2010, by Westwood staff. Signal timing data was provided by Hennepin County staff. General characteristics of the site include a suburban setting with wide intersection radii and turn lanes at major intersections. Sidewalks /paths are typically provided on at least one side of each roadway. On- street parking is generally prohibited, and the topography of the area is relatively flat. France Avenue (Hennepin County State Aid Highway 17) is a 6 -lane arterial roadway running north/south adjacent to the site. The posted speed limit in the vicinity of the site is 40 mph. Parklawn Avenue and West 76th Street are 4 -lane divided collectors. Speeds are 30 mph. The signalized intersection of France Avenue with Parklawn Avenue operates in standard 8 -phase fashion, with protected signal phasing for mainline lefts and protected/permissive phasing for side street lefts. Storage for the westbound left turn bay is fairly short, at approximately 120 feet plus taper. Pedestrians are accommodated via pushbutton actuation and are permitted to cross all four legs of the intersection. France Avenue and West 76th Street, also 8- phase, provides protected -only phasing for all four left turn movements. Dual left turn lanes are in place for the side street left turn movements. Storage bay length for the westbound left turn movement is limited, measuring only 150 feet plus taper, constrained by virtue of lining up end -to- end with the left turn lane for the site access intersection to the east. Channelization is provided for all right turn movements, which are all yield - controlled. The northbound approach has a fourth through lane, which eventually drops as a right turn lane at Parklawn Avenue. Peds are accommodated on all four legs via pushbuttons. Left turn phasing (of the protected/permissive variety) is provided only for the mainline movements at the intersection of West 76th Street and Site Access. Storage bay lengths for these two movements are minimal, measuring only approximately 50 feet plus taper. The southbound side street approach (exiting Centennial Lakes) is two -lane, providing a dedicated right turn lane in addition to a shared through/left turn lane. The northbound side street approach features only one lane. Peds are prohibited from crossing West 76h Street via posted signs. Ped pushbuttons are provided to facilitate crossing the side street legs. The side - street stop controlled intersection of Parklawn Avenue and Site Access is similar in geometric configuration to the West 76th Street access, with short 50 -foot mainline lefts and 2 northbound approach lanes. France Avenue and Plaza Drive is controlled via stop sign on the minor leg. One westbound lane, limited to right turns, is provided. The northbound right turn lane Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 7 November 10, 2010 { t functions as a shared through/right turn lane, ending as a right turn lane at Parklawn Drive. The westerly internal intersection on Plaza Drive is controlled via 3 -way stop, with inbound (eastbound) traffic being the approach not required to stop. One lane is provided for each approach. The geometric configuration for the easterly internal intersection is similar. The only operational difference between the two is that the lower - volume east intersection operates as an uncontrolled intersection with no stop or yield signs on any of the approaches. Figure 2 -3 illustrates the roadway geometry described above. Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 8 November 10, 2010 W Figure 2 -3 T T T �,Park�awn Ave U) (D Q U c U- TTr 0 a� a� V a� a� c ca u- '�TTTT('W76thSt Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Westwood STOP , STOP T N. m NNN Plaza Dr o T a� �o w y 'VA �y CT V Q ko Parklawn W 76th St Lane Geomeb Zulu y y 1 u /27/Zul u Not to Scale Traffic Operations Traffic operational analyses were conducted using the industry - current Synchro/ SimTraffic 7 software package. Synchro /SimTraffic uses the data and methodology published by the Transportation Research Board in the year 2000 version of their Highway Capacity Manual. Results from the SimTraffic portion of the Synchro /SimTraffic software package are reported unless otherwise noted. SimTraffic results were reported to fully account for the capacity - limiting effects caused by the close spacing of the study area intersections and existence of short turn pockets at several locations. Traffic operations are primarily rated by Level of Service (LOS), a grade ranging from "A" (best) to "F" (worst). Generally, Level of Service D represents the threshold for acceptable overall intersection operating conditions during a peak hour in the Twin Cities metro area, while LOS E is considered acceptable for individual movements. At side - street stop controlled intersections, delay is primarily incurred only on the side street approaches. It can be typical for a side - street stop controlled intersection to have good overall LOS and poor side - street LOS during peak periods. Overall LOS is reported along with the LOS of the worst individual movement or movements for all unsignalized intersections. Traffic operations can also be measured by looking at queuing. A queue is a line of vehicles waiting to pass through an intersection. Where queues from a congested intersection extend through upstream intersections or driveways, operations and safety can be impacted. The 95th percentile queue, or the length of queue with a 5% chance of occurring during the peak hour, is considered a standard for design purposes. For year 2010 conditions, the Synchro /SimTraffic model was calibrated to match field- observed conditions as closely as possible. In order to more accurately model the coordinated traffic signal control conditions along the France Avenue corridor, the immediately adjacent intersections on France Avenue (Gallagher Avenue to the north and Minnesota Drive to the south) were included in the model. Turning movement count estimates for these intersections were completed using the 2010 count data in combination with 2007 count data provided by the County. Details on these estimates are provided in the appendix. Table 2 -1 provides an overview of the study area LOS results for the 2010 Existing conditions analysis. Figures 2 -4 and 2 -5 provide more detailed summaries for the weekday PM and Saturday Midday peak hours, respectively. Complete Synchro and SimTraffic printouts are available in the appendix. . Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 10 November 10, 2010 ��7 Table 2 -1 2010 Existing Traffic Operations Intersection PM I Saturday LOS Delay LOS Delay France Ave. & Parklawn Ave. C 24 B 18 France Ave. & W. 76th St. C 29 B 15 Parklawn Ave. & Site Access* A/B 2 A/A 2 W. 76th St. & Site Access A 8 A 6 France Ave. & Plaza Dr.* A/C 4 A/B 3 Plaza Dr. & Westerly Internal Dr.* A/A 3 A/A 4 Plaza Dr. & Easterly Internal Dr.* A/A 1 A/A 1 Notes: * Indicates unsignalized intersection. Overall LOS / worst movement LOS reported. Delay = Average delay per vehicle, in seconds. PM Peak Hour Operations for the PM peak hour under existing conditions fall within acceptable thresholds according to the model. All study area intersections operate at acceptable Level of Service D or better. All movements operate at acceptable LOS E or better. Two of the study area intersections experience 95`h percentile queues longer than available turn lane storage bays: France Avenue & West 76`h Street The 95th percentile queue on the eastbound left turn movement is estimated by SimTraffic at 207 feet, roughly two car lengths beyond the available storage bay. West 76`h Street & Site Access The 95th percentile queue for the eastbound left turn movement is 80 feet, roughly one car length beyond the available storage bay. Operations at the internal site intersections on Plaza Drive are also noteworthy: Internal Site Intersections Operations at the two internal site intersections are very efficient, with delays under 10 seconds per vehicle (LOS A) and 95h percentile queues three vehicles in length or less. Saturday Peak Hour Acceptable operations are also shown throughout the model for existing Saturday Midday peak hour conditions. All study area intersections are at LOS D or better, while all movements report at LOS E or better. One 95`' percentile queue extends beyond the available turn bay: Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 11 November 10, 2010 0% West 76Th Street & Site Access SimTraffic projects the 950' percentile queue for the eastbound left turn movement at 72 feet, one car length beyond the available storage bay. Internal Site Intersections Similar to the weekday PM peak hour, operations at the two internal site intersections are very efficient, with delays under 10 seconds per vehicle (LOS A) and 951' percentile queues two to three vehicles in length. Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 12 l..A November 10, 2010 �J l Figure 2 -4 Whole Foods Centennial Lakes 2010 Existing PM Operational Analysis Results Node Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Overall 77 Parklawn Ave & France Ave (Signalized) Lanes <- T> <- T -> <- T'I`T -> <- I TTT> Volume 115 . 43 89 72 41 122 54 1315 41 149 1182 85 SimTraffic Delay 41.5 44.8 19.4 40.6 42.4 14.0 54.9 20.6 2.3 48.9 22.1 22.2 24.2 SimTraffic LOS D D B D D B D C A D C C C Storage 120 325 410 SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 1401 132 941 76 84 931 3861 39 193 330 82 W 76th St & France Ave (Signalized) Lanes FF TT -> FF TT <- TTTT <- TTT 4 Volume 234 476 265 213 178 237 79 916 100 141 1080 125 SimTraffic Delay 70.4 56.1 10.0 59.8 47.2 2.5 42.2 9.4 1.9 68.2 26.3 2.7 29.3 SimTraffic LOS E E A E D A D A A E C A C Storage 170 200 160 80 80 310 SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 2071 2891 143 1481 1311 46 1371 1131 2171 3241 1 101 Parklawn Ave & Site Access (Unsignalized) Lanes E- TT> <- Volume 26 110 81 17 107 7 36 2 21 46 5 80 SimTraffic Delay 3.0 1.2 1.3 3.8 0.1 6.3 11.2 2.6 5.5 7.7 2.9 2.2 SimTraffic LOS A A A A A A A B A A A A A Storage 50 50 120 ** SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 191 3 201 3 45 1 32 43 1 45 102 W 76th St & Site Access (Signalized) Lanes F TT> <- TT> <T> Volume 84 609 10 10 493 66 56 2 47 34 2 81 SimTraffic Delay 10.5 7.6 8.3 9.6 6.0 2.4 20.6 21.4 8.9 19.0 24.4 4.0 7.6 SimTraffic LOS B A A A A A C C I A B C A A Storage 50 50 170 ** SimTraffic 95th Queue I Sol 197 121 95 84 51 57 103 Plaza Dr & France Ave (Unsignalized) Lanes 4 TTTT> TTTT Volume 122 1287 97 1345 SimTraffic Delay 16.4 2.8 1.8 3.2 3.5 SimTraffic LOS C A A A A Storage 190 ** SimTraffic 95th Queue I I I 1 1 94 1 4 15 104 Plaza Dr & West Site Dr (3 -way stop) Lanes <t> <'r> <T> <T> Volume 25 43 28 21 401 15 561 241 30 30 411 23 SimTraffic Delay 0.3 0.3 0.2 4.6 5.0 2.8 4.11 5.21 3.2 4.4 5.51 2.9 3.3 SimTraffic LOS A A I A A A A A I A I A A A I A A Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 47 60 56 105 Plaza Or & East Site Dr (Unsignalized) Lanes <t> <t> <t> <t> Volume 40 461 17 1 381 1 8 11 1 1 11 30 SimTraffic Delay 1.6 0.5 0.3 1.1 0.3 0.1 1.5 0.31 0.5 0.21 0.2 0.7 SimTraffic LOS A A I A A A A A A I A A A I A A Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 16 1 3 10 7 ** = distance to first drive aisle Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 W 11/8/2010 Figure 2 -5 Whole Foods Centennial Lakes 2010 Existing Saturday Operational Analysis Results Node lIntersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Oven 77 Parkiauun Ava P. Franca Ova ISionali7PM 8: 30] 10: Lanes F T> F T -> F TTT 1 4 <- I TTT> SimTraffic 95th Queue Volume 87 14 78 22 23 65 52 1174 53 114 938 38 SimTraffic Delay 45.4 39.8 10.9 41.2 51.5 9.8 45.7 19.5 2.7 52.1 9.6 8.3 18.4 SimTraffic LOS D D B D D A D B A D A A B Storage SimTraffic Delay 120 325 12.8 410 1.8 SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 1301 83 461 42 501 75 350 44 159 159 W 76th St & France Ave (Signalized) A A A Lanes FF TT FF TT 190 ** F TTTT E- TTT Volume 95 61 61 160 43 93 42 1054 129 132 863 43 104 SimTraffic Delay 49.9 53.6 5.1 45.6 41.0 1.8 38.3 8.3 2.0 54.2 7.4 1.8 14.8 SimTraffic LOS D D A D D A D A A D A A B Storage 170 0.5 200 160 5.61 80 5.0 5.8 80 4.4 5.9 310 3.6 SimTraffic 95th Queue 89 68 A 108 58 A 74 119 A 171 168 A A Parklawn Ave & Site Access (Unsignalized) Storage Lanes F TT> F TT> <T 57 <T 58 Volume 11 72 78 20 70 2 30 3 25 2 2 6 SimTraffic Delay 2.7 1.0 1.2 3.1 0.1 1 5.7 7.3 2.3 5.5 7.8 2.3 1.6 SimTraffic LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A A Storage 50 SimTraffic LOS 50 A 120 ** A A I A A SimTraffic 95th Queue I ill 8 151 I A 42 1 44 14 1 18 W 76th St & Site Access (Signalized) SimTraffic 95th Queue 15 Lanes <- TT> F TT> <T> <- T> Volume 138 175 10 6 198 74 5 11 5 62 2 97 SimTraffic Delay 7.2 5.3 3.5 6.8 6.8 2.4 12.0 15.6 3.3 15.4 5.9 2.6 6.2 SimTraffic LOS A A A A A A B B I A B A A A ** = distance to first drive aisle Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 As- I 11/8/2010 Storage 1 501 501 1 IL/U-- SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 721 53 61 43 24 61 56 103 Plaza Or & France Ave (Unsignalized) Lanes 4 TTTT> TTTT Volume 160 1123 113 1040 SimTraffic Delay 12.8 2.3 1.8 2.0 2.8 SimTraffic LOS B A A A A Storage 190 ** SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 105 104 Plaza Or & West Site Or (3 -way stop) Lanes <T> <T> <T> <T> Volume 26 46 41 25 651 9 60 391 26 30 441 31 SimTraffic Delay 0.3 0.5 0.2 4.4 5.61 3.1 5.0 5.8 3.5 4.4 5.9 3.3 3.6 SimTraffic LOS A A A A A I A A A I A A A A A Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 6 57 76 58 105 Plaza Or & East Site Or (Unsignalized) Lanes <T> <T> <T> <T> Volume 25 42 32 2 431 1 131 11 1 1 1 43 - SimTraffic Delay 1.8 0.6 0.4 1.1 0.31 0.5 1.71 1 0.1 0.11 0.3 0.6 SimTraffic LOS A A A A A I A A I A I A A A I A A Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue 15 14 9 ** = distance to first drive aisle Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 As- I 11/8/2010 3. NO -BUILD SCENARIO Traffic Volumes No -Build traffic volumes for the 2013 design year were forecast by factoring up existing counts by a background growth rate of 0.5% annually. This growth rate was established in cooperation with City staff. Factors impacting the choice of background growth rate included two items. The first was a review of historical ADT volumes on France Avenue dating back to 1999. This data shows a downward trend in traffic volumes of roughly 0.7% annually, as shown in Figure 3 -1. Figure 3 -1 France Avenue Historical ADT Volumes 40,000 35,000 -- -- 30,000 --_ _ _ _ _ �_! 25,000 a 20,000 — 15,000 — 10,000 5,000 0 1999 2002 2005 2008 2011 Year Source: MnDOT Website The second item considered in the establishment of an appropriate background growth rate was the County-wide State Aid traffic forecast. For Hennepin County, Mn/DOT State Aid's 20 -year traffic projection factor of 1.1 yields an annual growth rate of just under 0.5 %. To provide for a worst -case scenario, City staff stipulated use of the 0.5% positive annual rate for the study. Also typically considered in background growth forecasts are planned nearby developments. In this case, City staff was aware of no such developments. The final item considered in estimating future background traffic volumes for the study area was potential filling of vacant space within the remainder of the Centennial Lakes shopping center itself. A review of current vacancies for Centennial Lakes indicated total vacant square footage of 13,400, for a vacancy rate of 7 %. According to the owner, this rate is lower than the 10% rate typically assumed by bankers and investors as average for this type of retail setting. Again; looking to provide for a worst -case scenario, City staff specified that full (100 %) occupancy be assumed for the No -Build scenario. Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 15 November 10, 2010 As- The trip generation potential of the vacant retail space was estimated using Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) data and methodologies, discussed further in Section 4, Build Scenario. Tables 3 -1 and 3 -2 show the number of trips generated associated with infill of current Centennial Lakes vacancies. Complete details are available in the appendix. Table 3 -1 Trip Generation Estimates — Infill of Centennial Lakes Existing Vacancies Gross Trips ' Land Use ITE Code I Size Weekday PM Peak I aturday I Saturday Peak JEEnter I Exit I Enter I Exit I Enter I Exit I Enter I Exit Specialty Retail 814 1 13,400 s.f. 1 2971 2971 161 201 2821 2821 281 28 Table 3 -2 Trip Generation Estimates — Infill of Centennial Lakes Existing Vacancies Gross, Driveway and Net New Trips Land Use Weekday I PM Peak I Saturday Saturday Peak Enter I Exit I Enter I Exit I Enter I Exit Enter Exit Gross Trips Specialty Retail 1 2971 2971 161 201 2821 2821 28 1 28 Trips (New Trips + Net New Trips Specialty Retail 1 2541 2541 131 171 2411 2411 24 24 The anticipated 2013 No -Build scenario volumes, developed by incorporating the 0.5% background growth rate plus the infill of existing Centennial Lakes vacancies, are shown on Figures 3 -2 and 3 -3 for the Weekday PM and Saturday Midday peak hours, respectively. The projected No -Build ADT volumes (and change vs. Existing), are as follows: • France Avenue (North of Site): 29,080 ( +580 / +2.0 %) • France Avenue (South of Site): 29,130 ( +630 / +2.2 %) • Parklawn Avenue (East of Site): 3,590 ( +90 / +2.6 %) • West 760' Street (East of Site): 9,300 ( +200 / +2.2 %) Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 16 November 10, 2010 W Figure 3 -2 Turning Movement Volumes 2013 No -Build - PM Whole Foods Centennial Lakes 1012712010 Westwood �� Not to Scale 1 parklawn Ave 0) rn 00 "2 00 �• 75 117 �' parklawn Ave $�.y 44-4 9G-.,3 Ln 4 (P. U) m Q n co U NN C U- co "-15 Cf) r" x`-130 co N Iq M X41 21 �, r- X39 �, 1 Plaza Dr 28 T cC 41 T 0 0 44---> m N co 47-> 0O r 31� 17-21 U) U) (D m w X241 U Nom rrr X182 223 0 �NM 23 W 76th St 00 10 263 g-y 8 6 W 76th St U a� Q m v c ca U- Whole Foods Centennial Lakes 1012712010 Westwood �� Not to Scale Figure 3 -3 Turning Movement Volumes 2013 No -Build - Saturday m U) a� r`-94 m u.) X45 C 172 9 62-> T W 76th St 62 Parklawn x-67 i LO N X25 8 Zn park�aWn 15-4 Lo 79,3 N. U Q n m U NN c T u- U i o X171 co u) o ,� 1 M 4-66 25 X44 �� �, r- 2 Plaza Dr f 31 I1' 26 Tr CO N 47—> (0vN 43� ��� T 46-4 32-.,,, _ m U) a� V; a� Q a� c m U_ 0 m co W �y U Q rn o ►` 7> W 76th St Whole Foods Centennial Lakes 10/27/2010 Westwood Not to Scale r`-94 m u.) X45 C 172 9 62-> T W 76th St 62 ch ti co Vo� V; a� Q a� c m U_ 0 m co W �y U Q rn o ►` 7> W 76th St Whole Foods Centennial Lakes 10/27/2010 Westwood Not to Scale Traffic Operations Traffic operational analyses were conducted for the Weekday PM and Saturday Midday peak hour conditions for the 2013 No -Build scenario. Table 3 -3 summarizes the overall results. Table 3 -3 2013 No -Build Traffic Operations Intersection PM Saturday LOS Delay LOS Delay France Ave. & Parklawn Ave. C 25 B 19 France Ave. & W. 76th St. C 29 B 15 Parklawn Ave. & Site Access* A/B 2 A/A 2 W. 76th St. & Site Access A 7 A 7 France Ave. & Plaza Dr.* A/B 4 A/B 3 Plaza Dr. & Westerly Internal Dr.* A/A 3 A/A 4 Plaza Dr. & Easterly Internal Dr.* A/A 1 A/A 1 Notes: * Indicates unsignalized intersection. Overall LOS / worst movement LOS reported. Delay = Average delay per vehicle, in seconds. PM Peak Hour Overall intersection and movement -by- movement LOS is acceptable throughout the study area. Changes from Existing conditions are very minor. No movements with oversize 95h percentile queues other than the two movements noted under Existing conditions are anticipated. No change in queuing for these two movements is forecast. 95' percentile queues at the internal site intersections remain at three vehicles or less. Saturday Peak Hour LOS throughout the study area remains within acceptable thresholds, with little change from Existing conditions. No change in 95 percentile queuing at the movement noted under Existing conditions is forecast. No additional movements experience oversize 95`h percentile queues. 95' percentile queues at the internal site intersections remain stable at three vehicles or less. Whole Foods Centennial Lakes r 1 yT Traffic Impact Analysis Page 19 November 10, 2010 Figure 3 -4 Whole Foods Centennial Lakes 2013 No -Build PM Operational Analysis Results Node lintersection I Eastbound I Westbound Northbound Southbound Over 771IParklawn Awn V. FranrP Ava ISinnalizndl K 101 10: Lanes <- T> F T -> F TTT 1 4 F TTT> SimTraffic 95th Queue Volume 117 44 90 75 42 124 55 13391 42 156 1199 86 SimTraffic Delay 44.8 46.8 27.4 41.4 47.9 13.6 50.3 20.1 2.9 49.1 22.7 25.3 24.7 SimTraffic LOS D D C D D B D C A D C C C Storage SimTraffic Delay 120 325 14.4 410 1.9 SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 1381 164 1011 71 871 91 362 42 1871 348 W 76th St & France Ave (Signalized) A A A Lanes <-F TT 4 FF TT 4 F TTTT 4 F TT'I` 4 Volume 238 483 269 223 182 241 80 934 103 144 1097 127 104 SimTraffic Delay 68.5 56.6 9.5 60.7 45.7 2.4 40.0 9.4 2.0 77.9 25.7 2.8 29.4 SimTraffic LOS E E A E D A D A A E C A C Storage 170 0.41 200 160 5.3 80 4.6 5.7 80 4.6 5.61 310 3.3 SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 1851 2831 132 1711 1281 29 1251 106 A 1 2391 330 83 I A Parklawn Ave & Site Access (Unsignalized) Storage Lanes <- TT> F TT> <T 4 <T 4 Volume 26 112 87 18 109 7 39 2 23 47 5 81 SimTraffic Delay 3.0 1.3 1.3 2.8 0.2 0.2 6.4 13.0 2.5 5.6 7.9 2.9 2.2 SimTraffic LOS A A A A A A A B A A A A A Storage 50 SimTraffic LOS 50 A 120 ** A I A I A A SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 191 6 211 I A 45 1 33 48 1 47 W 76th St & Site Access (Signalized) SimTraffic 95th Queue 15 Lanes 7 Volume 87 618 10 10 500 69 57 21 48 37 2 90 SimTraffic Delay 10.5 6.8 4.4 12.3 6.3 3.2 23.3 18.9 8.1 20.3 15.1 4.2 7.4 SimTraffic LOS B A A B A A C B A C B A I A ** = distance to first drive aisle Mi Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 11/8/2010 Storage 1 501 5U iiu~ SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 801 180 101 101 84 53 62 103 Plaza Dr & France Ave (Unsignalized) Lanes 4 TTTT> TTTT Volume 130 1305 104 1366 SimTraffic Delay 14.4 2.7 1.9 3.3 3.5 SimTraffic LOS B A A A A Storage 190 ** SimTraffic 95th Queue 97 1 1 18 104 Plaza Dr & West Site Dr (3-way stop) Lanes <T> <T> <T> <T> Volume 28 44 31 21 411 15 601 24 30 30 421 26 SimTraffic Delay 0.3 0.41 0.1 4.8 5.3 3.0 4.6 5.7 3.2 4.6 5.61 3.3 3.3 SimTraffic LOS A A I A A A I A A A A A A I A A Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 4 50 58 60 105 Plaza Or & East Site Dr (Unsignalized) Lanes <T> <t> <T> <T> Volume 41 47 17 11 391 1 8 11 1 11 11 31 SimTraffic Delay 1.6 0.51 0.3 0.31 0.1 1.9 0.1 0.1 0.7 0.21 0.2 0.7 SimTraffic LOS A A I A A I A I A A A I A A I A I A A Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue 15 10 7 ** = distance to first drive aisle Mi Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 11/8/2010 Figure 3 -5 Whole Foods Centennial Lakes 2013 No -Build Saturday Operational Analysis Results Node Intersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Overall 77 Parklawn Ave & France Ave (Signalized) Lanes F T> <- T 4 <- TTT E- TTT> Volume 88 15 79 25 24 67 53 1198 54 124 951 39 SimTraffic Delay 47.5 47.2 12.9 41.6 46.7 9.6 54.4 20.2 2.9 50.6 9.6 8.2 19.1 SimTraffic LOS D D B D D A D C A D A A B Storage 120 325 410 SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 1151 93 611 481 47 981 352 72 182 143 82 W 76th St & France Ave (Signalized) Lanes <-<- TT 4 <-F TT 4 F TTTT TTT 4 Volume 98 62 62 172 45 94 43 1077 133 876 44 SimTraffic Delay 49.5 52.3 5.2 48.8 47.4 1.9 39.8 8.7 2.1 ID 7.5 1.8 15.4 SimTraffic LOS D D A D D A D A A A A B Storage 170 200 160 80 80 310 SimTraffic 95th Queue 90 63 120 62 77 123 170 101 Parklawn Ave & Site Access (Unsignalized) Lanes E- TT> F TT> <T <T Volume 11 73 88 22 71 2 34 3 27 2 2 6 SimTraffic Delay 2.6 1.0 1.3 2.7 0.1 5.8 5.3 2.3 5.2 5.5 2.6 1.8 SimTraffic LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A A Storage 50 50 120 ** SimTraffic 95th Queue I ill 3 161 45 1 36 20 22 102 W 76th St & Site Access (Signalized) Lanes <_ TT> F TT> <T> Volume 144 178 10 6 201 78 5 11 5 66 21 109 SimTraffic Delay 7.9 5.6 3.3 7.7 8.5 2.7 15.8 7.4 2.4 16.1 18.01 2.7 7.1 SimTraffic LOS A A A A A A B A I A B B I A A Storage 50 50 170 ** SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 751 61 41 52 26 65 53 103 Plaza Or & France Ave (Unsignalized) Lanes 4 TTTT> TTTT Volume 171 1138 125 1057 SimTraffic Delay 13.2 2.3 1.9 1.9 2.9 SimTraffic LOS B A A A A Storage 190 ** SimTraffic 95th Queue I I I 1 1 107 1 3 1 10 104 Plaza Or & West Site Or (3 -way stop) Lanes <T> <T> <T> <T> Volume 31 47 46 25 661 9 651 401 26 30 451 36 SimTraffic Delay 0.3 0.5 0.2 5.0 5.41 3.6 4.9 5.8 3.3 4.4 6.01 3.3 3.7 SimTraffic LOS A A I A A A I A A I A I A A A I A A Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 6 52 67 63 105 Plaza Or & East Site Or (Unsignalized) Lanes <T> <T> <T> <T> Volume 26 43 32 2 441 1 13 11 1 1 11 44 SimTraffic Delay 1.8 0.5 0.3 1.3 .0.31 0.1 1.5 0.1 0.9 0.11 0.2 0.6 SimTraffic LOS A A I A A A I A A A I A A A I A A Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 14 1 12 8 ** =distance to first drive aisle All Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 11/8/2010 4. BUILD SCENARIO Traffic volumes with the proposed Whole Foods in operation were developed using a traditional multi -step traffic forecast and analysis process.. The steps in this process include: • Estimating the volume of new site - generated traffic (Trip Generation) • Anticipating the origin and destination of site - generated traffic (Trip Distribution) • Assigning site - generated traffic to the surrounding roadway network (Trip Assignment) • Adding the assigned site - generated traffic to the No -Build traffic volumes developed earlier to determine Build traffic volumes Trip Generation The trip generation rates utilized in this study are based on those documented in Trig Generation, 8th Edition, published by ITE. Trip Generation, 8d' Edition is considered the standard text in the traffic engineering profession for estimating gross trip generation potential. The overall change in trip generation potential of the site was forecast by subtracting the trip generation potential of the existing land uses to be removed from the trip generation potential of the proposed land use. Table 4 -1 summarizes the estimated trip generation potential of the land uses to be removed as part of the redevelopment. Table 4 -2 covers the trip generation potential of the proposed land use. Table 4 -1 Trip Generation Estimates — Existing Land Uses to be Removed Gross Trips Land Use ITE Code Size Weekday PM Peak Saturday Saturday Peak Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit Enter Exit Fumiture Store 890 9,300 s.f. 24 24 2 2 23 23 5 4 Specialty Retail 814 25,700 s.f. 570 570 31 39 540 540 54 54 Total 594 594 33 41 563 563 59 58 Table 4 -2 Trip Generation Estimates — Proposed Land Use Gross Trips Land Use ITE Code Size Weekday I PM Peak I Saturday Saturday Peak I Enter I Exit I Enter I Exit I Enter I Exit I Enter I Exit Supermarket 850 32,300 s.f. 1 1,651 1 1,6511 1731 166 1 2,868 1 2,868 1 1791 172 Internal and pass -by trips were estimated using data from ITE's Trip Generation Handbook, 2nd Edition, to the extent possible. Trip Generation Handbook, 2nd Edition, is a companion text to Trip Generation, and is considered the standard text in Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis 22 November 10, 2010 5-1 the traffic engineering profession for estimating internal and pass -by trips. Consistent, conservative assumptions were made where the Handbook data was incomplete. These assumptions were reviewed by City staff prior to initiation of the analysis. Full details are available in the appendix. Table 4 -3 summarizes the trip generation estimates of the redevelopment after accounting for internal and pass -by trip reductions. For the purposes of this study, internal trips are trips made from one Centennial Lakes land use to another that do not use the external roadway network. Pass -by trips are made by drivers that are already using the external roadway network, but choose to divert to the site (to pick up some groceries, for example) before continuing on their original route. Table 4 -3 includes three components: Gross, Driveway, and Net New trips: Gross trips reflect the baseline totals from Tables 4 -1 and 4 -2, before internal or pass -by trip reductions. Driveway trips reflect the amount of traffic actually using the site driveways (after the internal trip reduction). Because driveway trip totals include both pass -by and new trips, they are the totals used to develop the Build volume forecasts which are used for operational analysis. Net new trips reflect the amount of new traffic actually generated on nearby roads associated with the redevelopment. Table 4 -3 Trip Generation Estimates Existing Land Uses to be Removed + Proposed Land Use Gross, Driveway and Net New Trips Land Use Weekday I PM Peak I Saturday Saturday Peak I Enter I Exit I Enter I Exit I Enter I Exit Enter Exit Gross Trips Furniture Store -24 -24 -2 -2 -23 -23 -5 -4 Specialty Retail -570 -570 -31 -39 -540 -540 -54 -54 Supermarket 1,651 1,651 173 166 2,868 2,868 179 172 Total 1,057 1,057 140 125 2,305 2,305 120 114 Driveway Trips (New Trips+ Pass -By Trips) Furniture Store -23 -23 -2 -2 -22 -22 -5 -4 Specialty Retail -541 -541 -29 -37 -513 -513 -51 -51 Supermarket 1,568 1,568 164 158 2,725 2,725 170 163 Total 1,004 1,004 133 119 2,190 2,190 114 108 Net New Trips Fumiture Store -21 -21 -1 -1 -20 -20 -4 -4 Specialty Retail - 487 -487 -26 -33 -462 -462 -46 -46 Supermarket 1,098 1,098 105 101 1,907 1,907 119 114 Total 590 590 78 67 1,425 1,425 69 64 Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 23 November 10, 2010 00 Trip Distribution The assumed trip distribution for new site - generated traffic is shown on Figure 4 -1. This distribution pattern was developed together with City staff based on observation of traffic patterns near the site, review of existing turning movement volumes, and knowledge of the approximate market area of the proposed land use. All pass -by trips were assumed to initiate from France Avenue. The directional split of these trips was based on existing traffic volumes: 50% northbound, 50% southbound for both the weekday PM and Saturday midday peak hours. Trip Assignment Site - generated traffic, distributed accordingly, was assigned to the roadway network. Figures 4 -2 and 4 -3, for the weekday PM and Saturday Midday peak hours, respectively, detail the change in turning movement volumes anticipated with redevelopment of the site. Negative numbers indicate a decrease in volume associated with pass -by trips. Pass -by trips were split between the Parklawn, Plaza Drive, and West 76th Street driveways. All trips were primarily assigned to the driveway that provided the shortest trip and/or most direct route. Further details on routing assumptions are available in the appendix. Traffic Volumes The peak hour turning movement volumes for the Build scenario developed by adding the trip assignment volumes to the No -Build volumes discussed in Section 3 are presented on Figures 4 -4 and 4 -5, for the weekday PM and Saturday Midday peak hours, respectively. Projected changes in ADT volumes, Build vs. No- Build, are as follows: • France Avenue (North of Site): +350 / +1.2% • France Avenue (South of Site): +470 / +1.6% • Parklawn Avenue (East of Site): +90 / +2.5% • West 76th Street (East of Site): +140 / +1.5% The resulting Build ADT volumes (and change compared with Existing conditions) are as follows: • France Avenue (North of Site): 29,430 ( +930 / +3.3 %) • France Avenue (South of Site): 29,600 ( +1,100 / +3.9 %) • Parklawn Avenue (East of Site): 3,680 ( +180 / +5.1 %) • West 760' Street (East of Site): 9,440 ( +340 / +2.2 %) Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 24 November 10, 2010 4 Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Figure 4 -1 Trip Distribution Ir 11 130%1 II II II II 11 II 11 II 11 11 II II II 10%1 II II 11 11 11 II II , 11 11 II 3% II • II 1I SitV ` II In � n III ` III ` n PPI ` 1I1I� 111 ` nl O O III Pb, D pha 111 III ;a � ~�i 111 ILL � 111 III i nl n1 i nl nl i nl � _ -7% -- -- -- ---- ------ - - - ---- - -- -- - - - - - - _ m 12% Westwood II. 1 �� 10/12/20 - II nn @ WT th SC II U# 111, 11 °PPPP 11 1111 II IIII 0 % II IIII II 1111 11 1111 II 1111 0% Westwood II. 1 �� 10/12/20 Figure 4 -2 PM Trip Assignment Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Westwood 463 '10/27/2010 Not to Scale �.0 � Parklawn Ave TI-2 g �, Go QNr <--0 15 � � Parklawn Av e cT' 6'� 2- cv cn cro Q n m V C NIp cc U- N 0 0 X48 00 04 �' �0 ,� F-0 Plaza Dr o 0 U) U) N N CO t0 W V CO) `-0 �. 0 19 Tg W76thSt y W 76th St (D Q m U C (C LL Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Westwood 463 '10/27/2010 Not to Scale Figure 4 -3 Saturday Trip Assignment Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Westwood � � 10/27/2010 Not to Scale �.0 � Parklawn Ave rl-2 g �, Cq fl 13 P arklaWn Ave a� 2 2-4 N v (n. Q 0 CO U NN C f0 U- 0 0 '0 t- X42 T E-0 ,� F-0 Plaza Dr 54 T 1 N U) 1—j 0—> U) U) N N O CO c9 W V� U O � A k-0 � w r E- 36 � 0-4 T g W 76th St (-, N W 76th St a� Q m U C (C LL Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Westwood � � 10/27/2010 Not to Scale Figure 4-4 Turning Movement Volumes 9fl49 Ruiirl _ PM ,� 25 Parklawn N x,426 (D 04 .l .� 0 117 Pat 1� 46-4 It'; u.) 't 90- CO % (p. U) c Qco v NN C N U- � X15 F`--1 v co E—'41 M E-39 X177 21 �, 1 Plaza Dr I, 91 T 4 T CO (0o 45� co cn co 47� °0 31� 17-� 0 0 :! U m co w 00 aMO X241 vj X263 c a� a� U C U_ T I' W 76th St 1 00 s a� Now y W 76th St Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Westwood A S 10/27/2010 Not to Scale L Figure 4 -5 rn ti x-69 rn cD T <-24 37 P ark1awn Av $7� 79-y tn1� N r U) m �n mCO� a� Q U 207 C CU L 102 62-� LL ry � ^ � ?p C[•� 9r--� �- O "6 F` -213 �~ M 25 Qo m CO a� 1� e � 1' �2 06�-ppca N N. n XNN `t X<--,44 2 Plaza Dr 27 T 43--> ch r- 32� 0 m U) ca W Turning Movement Volumes Z073 BUM - Parklawn a, m (D c m L u_ Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Westwood AT 10/27/2010 Not to Scale �y X94 m �n mCO� E-49 �, 207 X86 102 62-� � W 76th St ry � ^ � ?p ch M �qQ 62� o ch 11 W 76th St a, m (D c m L u_ Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Westwood AT 10/27/2010 Not to Scale Traffic Operations Traffic operational analyses were conducted for the weekday PM and Saturday Midday peak hour conditions for the Build scenario, similar to process for the No- Build scenario. Overall results of the analysis are shown in Table 4 -4. A comparison with the Existing and No -Build scenarios is provided in Table 4 -5. Further details on Build operational analysis results are provided in Figures 4 -6, 4 -7, and the appendix. Table 4 -4 2013 Build Traffic Operations Intersection PM Saturday LOS Delay LOS Delay France Ave. & Parklawn Ave. C 26 C 21 France Ave. & W. 76th St. C 30 B 16 Parklawn Ave. & Site Access* A/A 2 A/A 2 W. 76th St. & Site Access A 8 A 7 France Ave. & Plaza Dr.* A/C 4 A/C 4 Plaza Dr. & Westerly Internal Dr.* A/A 4 A/A 5 Plaza Dr. & Easterly Internal Dr.* A/A 1 A/A 1 Notes: * Indicates unsignalized intersection. Overall LOS / worst movement LOS reported. Delay = Average delay per vehicle, in seconds. PM Peak Hour Overall intersection LOS remains acceptable throughout the study area for Build conditions, with little change from No -Build conditions. The two movements with oversize 95th percentile queues noted under Existing conditions remain the only two movements in the study area with oversize queues. No significant change in the length of these queues is forecast. 95th percentile queues at the internal site intersections remain at three vehicles or less. Saturday Peak Hour LOS throughout the study area remains acceptable. The oversize 95th percentile queues at the movement noted under existing conditions remain stable. No additional movements experience oversize 95th percentile queuing. Similar to the PM peak hour, 95h queues at the internal site intersections remain at three vehicles or less. Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 30 November 10, 2010 ku1 Table 4 -5 Traffic Operations — Three Scenario Comparison Intersection 2010 Existing 2013 No -Build 2013 Build PM I Saturday PM Saturday PM Saturday LOS IDelayl LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay, France Ave. & Parklawn Ave. C 24 B 18 C 25 B 19 C 26 C 21 France Ave. & W. 76th St. C 29 B 15 C 29 B 15 C 30 B 16 Parklawn Ave. & Site Access' A/B 2 A/A 2 A/B 2 A/A 2 A/A 2 A/A 2 W. 76th St. & Site Access A 8 A 6 A 7 A 7 A 8 A 7 France Ave. & Plaza Dr.* A/C 4 A/B 3 A/B 4 A/B 3 A/C 4 A/C 4 Plaza Dr. & Westerly Internal Dr.* A/A 3 A/A 4 A/A 3 A/A 4 A/A 4 A/A 5 Plaza Dr. &Easterly Internal Dr.* A/A 1 A/A 1 A/A 1 A/A 1 A/A 1 A/A 1 Notes: Indicates unsignalized intersection. Overall LOS / worst movement LOS reported. Delay = Average delay per vehicle, in seconds. Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 31 November 10, 2010 Figure 4 -6 Whole Foods Centennial Lakes 2013 Build PM Operational Analysis Results Node lintersection Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Over; 77 Parklawn Ave & France Ave (Signalized) 82 10] 102 Lanes F T> F T 4 <- TTT 4 F TTT> SimTraffic 95th Queue Volume 117 46 90 90 42 126 57 1358 42 207 1172 86 SimTraffic Delay 37.6 47.6 21.5 41.8 45.9 13.9 55.8 23.6 3.0 48.8 22.8 23.5 I 26.3 SimTraffic LOS D D C D D B E C A D C C C Storage SimTraffic Delay 120 325 18.2 410 2.1 SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 1401 146 1071 59 861 95 4161 146 2421 333 W 76th St & France Ave (Signalized) A A A Lanes <-E- TT 4 <-<- TT 4 <- TTTT 4 <- TTT 4 Volume 244 483 269 263 186 241 80 9651 103 144 1083 128 104 SimTraffic Delay 70.9 60.0 10.0 61.1 44.7 2.6 39.6 8.8 1.9 73.3 24.4 2.6 29.5 SimTraffic LOS E E A E D A D A A E C A C Storage 170 0.4 200 160 5.91 80 5.5 5.9 80 5.4 6.81 310 3.9 SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 2181 3071 183 1881 1271 59 135 103 A 216 315 58 I A Parklawn Ave & Site Access (Unsignalized) Storage Lanes F TT> <- TT> <T 4 <T 80 Volume 26 112 140 25 109 7 56 2 28 47 5 81 SimTraffic Delay 2.8 1.3 1.5 3.9 0.2 1 6.6 8.0 2.6 6.0 7.0 3.0 2.4 SimTraffic LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A A Storage 50 SimTraffic LOS 50 A 120 ** A I A I A A SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 181 9 301 A 48 1 38 47 1 47 W 76th St & Site Access (Signalized) SimTraffic 95th Queue 18 Lanes 9 Volume. 87 618 10 10 500 78 57 21 48 45 2 134 SimTraffic Delay 11.5 8.1 7.3 9.0 7.3 3.9 20.6 22.8 9.1 20.3 25.2 5.0 8.4 SimTraffic LOS B A A A A A C C A C C A A ** =distance to first drive aisle Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 A-0 11/8/2010 Storage 1 501 501 1 no #; SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 941 204 ill 109 88 61 76 103 Plaza Dr & France Ave (Unsignalized) Lanes 4 TTTT> T.TTT Volume 177 1278 168 1354 SimTraffic Delay 18.2 2.9 2.1 3.3 3.9 SimTraffic LOS C A A A A Storage 190 ** SimTraffic 95th Queue 128 1 8 104 Plaza Dr & West Site Dr (3 -way stop) Lanes <t> <T> <t> <t> Volume 91 45 31 21 411 15 60 341 30 30 941 74 SimTraffic Delay 0.3 0.4 0.2 4.8 5.91 3.5 5.5 5.9 3.5 5.4 6.81 4.4 3.9 SimTraffic LOS A A A A A I A A A I A A A I A A Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 8 51 69 80 105 Plaza Dr & East Site Dr (Unsignalized) Lanes <T> <T> <T> <T> Volume 42 47 17 11 391 1 81 11 1 1 11 31 SimTraffic Delay 1.5 0.6 0.3 1.3 0.31 0.1 1.21 0.11 0.1 1.11 0.11 0.2 0.6 SimTraffic LOS A A A A I A I A A I A I A A I A A A Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue 18 10 9 ** =distance to first drive aisle Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 A-0 11/8/2010 Figure 4 -7 Whole Foods Centennial Lakes 2013 Build Saturday Operational Analysis Results Node Intersection r Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Overall 77 Parklawn Ave & France Ave (Signalized) Lanes F T> F T 4 Volume 88 17 79 37 24 69 55 12151 54 167 929 39 SimTraffic Delay 43.6 44.5 12.2 41.2 46.9 10.9 57.7 23.1 3.1 52.9 9.2 8.4 20.9 SimTraffic LOS D D B D D B E C A D A A C Storage 120 325 410 SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 1171 91 541 49 54 89 354 42 2261 145 82 W 76th St & France Ave (Signalized) Lanes <- -� TT 4 E-F TT �i F TTTT E TTT Volume 102 62 62 207 49 94 43 1105 133 135 866 45 SimTraffic Delay 47.6 53.7 5.2 47.3 46.8 1.7 38.3 9.0 2.1 52.8 8.2 1.8 16.1 SimTraffic LOS D D A D D A D A A D A A B Storage 170 200 160 80 80 310 SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 95 611 1331 631 84 123 177 153 101 Parklawn Ave & Site Access (Unsignalized) Lanes < TT> <- TT> <T <T 4 Volume 11 73 133 28 71 2 48 3 32 2 2 6 SimTraffic Delay 2.7 1.0 1.5 3.9 0.1 5.6 8.4 2.4 4.1 6.1 2.2 1.9 SimTraffic LOS A A A A A A A A A A A A A Storage 50 50 120 ** SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 121 6 281 47 1 38 21 1 18 102 W 76th St & Site Access (Signalized) Lanes F TT> F TT> <T> E T> Volume 144 178 10 6 201 86 5 11 5 73 2 149 SimTraffic Delay 8.1 6.5 3.4 5.9 8.9 2.3 17.5 8.1 2.1 16.0 26.8 3.0 7.1 SimTraffic LOS A A A A A A B A I A B C A A Storage 50 50 170 ** SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 771 56 6 53 21 70 1 62 103 Plaza Or & France Ave (Unsignalized) Lanes 4 TTTT> TTTT Volume 213 1116 180 1047 SimTraffic Delay 16.6 3.5 2.2 1.9 3.8 SimTraffic LOS C A A A A Storage 190 ** SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 133 1 83 104 Plaza Or & West Site Or (3 -way stop) Lanes <T> <T> <T> <T> Volume 85 48 46 25 66 9 65 48 26 30 92 77 SimTraffic Delay 0.4 0.6 0.2 6.9 7.1 4.0 8.5 6.1 4.9 6.0 I 7.7 5.3 4.9 SimTraffic LOS A A A A A A A A I A A A A A Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 14 62 78 88 105 Plaza Or & East Site Or (Unsignalized) _ Lanes <T> <T> <T> <T> Volume 27 43 32 2 4411 13 11 1 1 11 44 SimTraffic Delay 1.7 0.6 0.4 1.9 0.3 0.1 1.9 0.1 0.1 0.11 0.2 0.6 SimTraffic LOS A A I A A A A A A A A A I A A Storage SimTraffic 95th Queue 13 14 7 ** = distance to first drive aisle Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 4 -D 11/8/2010 5. TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT The goal of Travel Demand Management (TDM) is to reduce the peak hour traffic demand generated by the site by managing and minimizing the vehicle trips generated by the development. This section covers aspects of the site that will help foster travel demand management in three categories, Pedestrian, Bicycle and Transit. This section also notes specific travel demand management strategies that could be implemented by the owner /end user /property manager /etc. of the site to further reduce peak hour travel demand. Pedestrian Situated in the heart of Edina's Southdale commerical district, the site location is primarily automobile- focused. Those choosing to access the site via the pedestrian mode are likely to originate from the multi - family housing land uses located immediately east of the site. Despite the low volume of pedestrian trips anticipated, the site has been designed to fully accommodate accessibility by pedestrians. Sidewalk access is currently available from all corners of the site. This connectivity will be preserved and enhanced as shown on the Pedestrian Connectivity Plan, Figure 5 -1. Bicycle Both employees and customers are able to access shops within the Centennial Lakes shopping center by bicycle. In addition to the pedestrian sidewalk system, the addition of bike racks at one or more convenient locations on site is suggested to accommodate bicycle users. Figure 5 -1 notes one such potential location. Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 34 I November 10, 2010 FIGURE 5 -1 PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION 111111111.[11. '/ PARKLAWN AVENUE � D Z n m n 9 z c m O c x or111111111'i Yllltlll N\ r �� 78TH STREET lulnilullnll® -_- i k7� LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED N T N.T.S. w Westwood Transit Existing bus service to the Site is provided by Metro Transit Route 6. Route 6 provides local all -day service seven days per week along France Avenue between Downtown Minneapolis and the University of Minnesota (Downtown), the site, and parts of Bloomington to the south. Route 6 is characterized as a "Hi- Frequency" route by Metro Transit; busses run every 5 -10 minutes during peak periods with service every 30 minutes off -peak. Four additional bus routes provide service within a three -block radius, Routes 539, 540, 578, and 587. These routes all provide limited weekday only service. Figure 5 -2 shows the path of these routes near the site. The location of three the bus stops available on the perimeter of the site are highlighted. Figure 5 -2 Source: Metro 1 ransit Strategies suggested to encourage transit use by employees are outlined below. Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 36 November 10, 2010 A73 TDM Strategies This section provides suggestions for specific travel demand management strategies that could be implemented by the end of the site. In choosing the implement and maintain these strategies, the end user would be assisting Edina in achieving their goal of enhancing the local transportation system by lowering peak hour travel demand, helping to achieve a balance in the needs of all users of the transportation system. General 1. Minimize truck and/or service deliveries during Monday — Friday peak hour traffic times. 2. Provide schedule flexibility to allow employees to coordinate their shifts with the appropriate transit schedule. 3. Include alternative transportation mode information in new employee orientation materials. Pedestrian 1. Rebuild sidewalks impacted by construction with ADA- compliant tactile truncated dome curb ramps, facilitating use by all pedestrians. 2. Maintain clear and well -lit sidewalks along the site perimeter. Bicycle 1. Provide conveniently located bicycle racks for customer and employee use. 2. Promote employee bicycle use by posting and regularly maps of the regional bike trail system on an employee common space bulletin board. Transit 1. Include in a display of commuter information in employee common areas. Include information on Metro Transit schedules and stop locations for routes serving the nearby area. 2. Consider offering employees the ability to purchase transit passes through a payroll deduction system. Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 37 November 10, 2010 V1 6. RECOMMENDATIONS Two movements experience 95h percentile queues longer than available storage bay lengths under existing conditions (eastbound left at France/Parklawn and eastbound left at West 76'x' /Site Access). The magnitude by which these queues exceed the available storage bays is small at roughly one to two car lengths. The addition of traffic due to background growth, infill of existing Centennial Lakes vacancies and proposed Whole Foods redevelopment does not increase queuing on these movements. Extension of turn bays to accommodate 1 to 2 additional vehicles is not practical from a cost/benefit perspective; therefore no mitigation is recommended. • The Travel Demand Management (TDM) strategies covered in Section 5 should be implemented and maintained to provide ongoing reduction in the amount of peak hour traffic generated by the site. Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 38 November 10, 2010 �7j 6. APPENDIX A. Traffic Count Data 1. Year 2010 PM and Saturday Turning Movement Counts 2. Year 2007 Weekday Midday and PM Turning Movement Counts 3. Estimate of 2010 Turning Movements at Gallagher and Minnesota B. Traffic Estimate Details 1. Trip Generation Estimate Details — Full Occupancy of Centennial Lakes 2. Trip Generation Estimate Details — Existing Uses to Be Removed 3. Trip Generation Estimate Details — Proposed Uses 4. Trip Assignment — Full Occupancy of Centennial Lakes Only 5. Trip Assignment — Existing Uses to Be Removed Only 6. Trip Assignment — Proposed Uses Only 7. Roster of Existing Centennial Lakes Vacancies C. Synchro and SimTraffic Operational Analysis Result Worksheets 1. 2010 Existing PM Peak Hour 2. 2010 Existing Saturday Midday Peak Hour 3. 2013 No -Build PM Peak Hour 4. 2013 No -Build Saturday Midday Peak Hour 5. 2013 Build PM Peak Hour 6. 2013 Build Saturday Midday Peak Hour Whole Foods Centennial Lakes Traffic Impact Analysis Page 39 November 10, 2010 476 war =u WB-67 WADINC FF 852.2 WHOLE FOODS MARKET 32,340 SF FF 846.0 -n z 0 m M zolio m Lu • 9. Q) c I ,,,,;, II I� � 2 � / Ij I / \ (SEG SAN / i PARKLAWN AVENUE � WB -67 A::W I LOADING \ FF asz.x I D WHOLE FOODS MARKET z 32,340 SF P: x+ FF 846.0 \ o� i I z e m m C I Qm G co W O P 9 \ �= I o- PIE I Q o v L 8 \ B M I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I� I I I I I I I I I I I I :,,,i I l n\ _— — '�— o / r.'� ✓✓ I u Z n cim Qc cn vc Q= i i '6J 5 jII� I � <J � 11r Cary Teaaue -rom: Jack Sullivan Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 8:59 AM To: Thomas A. Bonneville (TABonneville @aol.com) Cc: Michael Schroeder (Mschroeder23 @msn.com); Sharon Allison (SAllison @ci.edina.mn.us); Wayne D. Houle P.E. (whoule @ci.edina.mn.us); Cary Teague Subject: FW: ETC proposal by Whole Foods Tom, I have forwarded your email on to Michael Schroeder. An overview of the discussion at the ETC meeting will be in the draft meeting minutes that the Planning Commission will receive. Regards, Jack Jack Sullivan, Assistant City Engineer 'r + 952- 826 -0445 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 {„ isullivan(cDci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business We've moved! The Edina Public Works & Park Maintenance Facility is located at 7450 Metro Blvd. Hours are 7 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. From: TABonneville @aol.com [mailto:TABonneville @ aol.com] Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2010 7:18 PM To: Jack Sullivan Subject: Fwd: ETC proposal by Whole Foods Jack, I have Mike's email wrong, would you kindly.pass this on to him? From: TABonneville @aol.com To: mschoeder23 @msn.com, jsullivan @ci.edina.mn.US CC: tabonneville @aol.com Sent: 11/21/2010 7:10:20 P.M. Central Standard Time Subj: ETC proposal by Whole Foods While I was alone in voting to deny Whole Foods proposal as stated in the ETC meeting this week, I feel that the project does, in fact, adversely affect the adjacent roadway system. I wish that my comments will be carried forward as a minority position, to the Planning Commission and City Council 1. All trucks coming to the dock position must pass the dock in front of Ultimate Electronics, coming to a full stop, then backing up and left (most difficult truck turn) into the WF dock. Most importantly are the WB -65 trucks or larger (semi trucks with a 53' trailer and 12' or more tracker). These truck will use all of the front driveway duping the entry from Park lawn Blvd, and again while maneuvering to get into the dock. At 2100 vehicles per day, autos entering and leaving the site, all trying to use this most appropriate and convenient access point, will be held up inside the site and on the roadway, blocking at least one lane of Park lawn in both eastbound and westbound facing direction of flow. 2. While a truck of the larger size like the WB -65 and even some smaller may be exiting the site at the Park lane access, the driver will encounter the median turning left toward France Ave, That median currently has too long a projection easterly, so will probably need to be cut off so the rear trailer wheels do not drive over the curbs. I have the tracking layouts for truck wheelbase sizes including the 42.50, 45,62, size trucks with trailers and with single axle design and their complex turning required. Autocadd and Microstation will now also be capable of accurately showing the tracks for backing up and going forward. This should be a required drawing for all commercial design location site plans to the City of Edina before it goes to the ETC or staff. 3. Vehicle right turn entry into the Park lawn access is heavy and the site plan shows no turn stacking, so the backup in #1 above will in fact, occur. There is enough space behind the store to allow a lane for turning. Not having it is another negative impact on the Edina Street System. If the City still desires to have these movements, then a drawing showing the right and left inbound turns leading to a stop on the fire lane plus a second drawing showing the backing up movements into each of the docks on the WF store. A last drawing should show the exiting from the dock to the access point and left to the Park lawn route to France. No trucks should be allowed to use the France or 76th Street access points leading to the WF docks. No receiving though the front doors shall be allowed. No truck storage on -site beyond the dock positions should be allowed. WSB seems to overrule the City by stating that the project does not adversely affect the roadway system... before ETC, EPC or ECC has seen the plans. Submitted respectfully, Thomas A. Bonneville ETC Commissioner Jackie Hoogenakker From: Nancy Johnson <nrjl @earthlink.net> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2010 2:56 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Whole Foods Project I think having a whole foods market in Centennial Lakes Plaza would be a great compliment to the area and will give us fresh, organic and wholesome food and produce that we greatly need. The farmers market this summer was a great success and having a store that continually has organically or homegrown foods is a plus. I already go to the one on Excelsior but don't go as often as I would like because of the distance. I have also emailed the project Director to let him know that I am all for this improvement to the quality of life in Edina. Good luck and I look forward to the opening of the store. Nancy Johnson, 4100 Parklawn Ave. Jackie Hoogenakker From: Irene Larson <ikslarson @gmail.com> Sent: Monday, November_22, 2010.1L•20 AM To: fack-le-H cogen -akke Subject: Fwd: 2010.0007.10a ---- - - - - -- Forwarded message ---- - - - - -- From: Irene Larson <ikslarsong mail.com> Date: Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:05 AM Subject: 2010.0007.10a To: jhoogenakkergcl.edina.mn.us In response to the Edina Planning Commission notice. re: Whole Foods grocery store at Centennial Lakes Plaza. I do not think that we need another grocery store in this area. We already have Byerly - Lunds, a Super Target and a very good Cub Foods. We also have Rainbow a short distance away in Bloomington. It would add to traffic congestion with the two levels of the Plaza and Parklawn which is already difficult enough.. Also, I would really miss the lovely Storables and Thomasville. Please do not put Whole Foods in there. Thank you for your consideration. Irene Larson 7500 York Ave. So. #703 Edina. Mn. 55435 i Jackie Hoogenakker From: bradley.winter @comcast.net Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2010 4:31 P(� To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Whole Foods Development Plan - Comments I am in favor of some competition for the other high -end grocers in the area. Brad Winter & Amy Wiechmann 810 Coventry Place Edina, MN. 55435 Regards, Brad Jackie Hooaenakker From: Kristen Larson <krislars @yahoo.com> Sent: Saturday, November-20,-2010 843-PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Whole Foods Proposal In response to the Public Hearing Notice of the Whole Food proposal: Although Whole Foods would be the fourth grocery store in close distance (accompanying Byerly's, Super Target & Cub), I would welcome Whole Foods in my neighborhood. I find their foods selections to be unique by offering more organic and natural foods and a variety of ready to eat meals. This is something the other grocery stores do not provide to the same extent. I have gone to other Whole Foods stores for breakfast to eat in one of their onsite booths and would love to be able to do that right in my neighborhood! Even better if they would open before Sam. :) I also support Whole Foods in the proposed location, since it would replace Storables. Within blocks there is a Container Store, which, to me, makes Storables unnecessary. Kristen Larson Resident of Edinborough Condos Jackie Hoogenakker 'rom: Reid -Haase sreidhaase@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 11:32 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Proposed Whole Foods store at 7401 France Ave So. Dear Edina Planning Department, I would like to voice my support for the proposed Whole Foods Store to be located at 7401 France Ave So. I have been a consumer of products that are carried by this grocery chain and have found it necessary to make trips outside of the Edina shopping area on France to purchase products unavailable at Byerly's, Target, Cub foods or other nearby grocery stores. Given that the proposed structure would meet appropriate codes, setbacks, signage, etc. and not adversely hinder traffic in the area, I would think this would be an excellent addition to the Centennial Lakes shopping area. My opinion is that the Centennial Lakes 'strip mall' has lacked as stronger anchor store presence. Whole foods would fulfill that purpose and undoubtedly be welcomed by the other retail occupants in the complex. Thank you for including my comments and support during the Edina Planning Commission public hearing scheduled for December 1, 2010 at 7pm. Sincerely, Reid Haase (resident and property owner) 7350 York Ave. So, #207 Edina, MN 55435 49SN�,r ok e MEMORANDUM - Plan Review ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA DATE: December 1, 2010 TO: Cary Teague — City Planner FROM: Wayne Houle — Director of Public Works / City Engineer -- SUBJECT: Updated Memo Centennial Lakes Plaza —Whole Foods 7401 France Avenue South Engineering received updated truck turning movements for the delivery vehicles for the above project. The original turning movements did not affect the entrance and entrance island from Parklawn Avenue into the site. The new turning movements do affect the geometry of this entrance. Changes to the design of this entrance to accommodate the largest possible delivery vehicle (WB -67) include the following: • Shorten the south end of the of the entrance island. • Widen the entrance into the site to accommodate two traffic lanes. • Submit internal restriping plan to show lane usage from Parklawn Avenue to the crosswalk. • Indicate crosswalk as a different pavement such as concrete or use of DuraTherm — an integrated asphalt marking system for crosswalks similar to the crosswalk by City Hall see their web site: http : / /www.integratedpaving.com/ our - products /duratherm /index.cfm. There has been some discussion regarding the sidewalk extension along France Avenue. Per City Code this is an allowed request to make by Staff. The sidewalk could be installed between the existing boulevard trees and the parking lot to minimize disturbance to the trees. Detailed plans will need to be submitted with the permit drawings if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding memo. Thanks G:%Englneerin9%Genersi1F Streets 17401 n75011 Centennial Lakes Plaza%Whole FoodslApprovaN20101201 updated review of 7401 France Avenue South Whole Foods.docx WA RKET P O O / S P PR r. / ' j ' rl mIIII1191IIIII Bl r `� . x i 1 0 rw C I C) a mn —t i / 15.00 5-1.00 \ J 00 45.60 0.00 4.00 18.50 WB -67 leer Tractor Width : B.00 Lock to Lock Tim. I 0.0 L TWI.r Width \ :8.50 Si,oringg MBI. ArticulolinB MBIa 28.4 75.0 Troller Track :8.50 j ' rl mIIII1191IIIII Bl r `� . x i 1 0 rw C I C) a mn —t i WA ARKET I -,. a,4.. PR 19.00 93.OD f ' 300 45.50 0.00 7 � 4.00 1 8.50 Owe -67 feet Tractor YAM : 8.00 Lock to Lock Time : 5.0 PJ ' Trailer 1Ytlth :8.50 Steering A, :28.4 to \ Tractor Track : &00 Miculatinq AnBls : 75.0 ..� ;, •, ::, !L Troller Track :850 \ LOADING FIF 8 F 852.2 ro 9 L n i i i i i i i i — B X I I =' (� 21ij O Is n G II -i ti N I WA 4RKET LOADING DOCK FF 852.2 i i i i Spy R��P E'tOPC�o\NIG E / 5 r � 1 15.00 53.00 •� o.00 � .o0 1pso WB -67 feel ' Tractor Wldth : &00 Lock to Lock Time : 0.0 •:.`. -� 1• ' �'� Trdler Vfidlh : &50 Sleerinq Mp1e : 29.4 Tractor Track : &00 Miculogng Angle :76.0 \ . ' Trdler Track : &50 L'W \ \ ' 0 x 1 r a a 0 G m 0 \� I mn 1 J Jackie Hoogenakker From: ann.deis @co.hennepin.mn.us Sent: Monday, November 29, 2010 9:36 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Whole Foods A Whole Foods store would be an excellent addition to the Centennial Lakes Plaza! Disclaimer: Information in this message or an attachment may be government data and thereby subject to the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, may be subject to attorney - client or work product privilege, may be confidential, privileged, proprietary, or otherwise protected, and the unauthorized review, copying, retransmission, or other use or disclosure of the information is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please immediately notify the sender of the transmission error and then promptly delete this message from your computer system. Jackie Hoogenakker 'rom: Susan Dixon <sdixon410 @gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2010 3:45 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Future Whole Foods at Centennial Lakes Edina Planning Commission- My husband and I are thrilled and excited with the Whole Foods development coming to our neighborhood. We are frequent customers of Whole Foods and other healthy, organic markets and think this is a perfect fit for the Centennial Lakes area. We look forward to this project advancing. Mark and Sue Dixon 802 Coventry Place Edina, Mn 55435 952- 929 -1450 Jackie Hoogenakker From: dorothy @updateservicesinc.com Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2010 10:34 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Whole Foods Development I just wanted to send you a note to say that I am completely in favor of the plan to tear down the Storables/Thomasville building to put in a Whole Foods grocery store. I think it would be a significant improvement and would add a variety in the grocery options that has been lacking. Sincerely, Dorothy Byron 1004 Coventry Place Edina, MN 55435 Jackie Hoogenakker "rom: Wendy Amundson <wramundson @aol.com> Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2010 6:47 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Whole Foods store project Although I do like Whole Foods and would probably shop there occasionally if there was one in the area, I am concerned about the number of grocery options in this area and the competition it presents especially for locally owned stores, especially Byerly's. With the addition of Whole Foods there will be 4 grocery options (incl Byerly's, Cub and Target) within a half -mile of me and another, Rainbow, within 1 -1/2 miles of me. Wendy Amundson 7310 York Ave So, #106 Edina, MN 55435 952 - 835 -4613 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Dorothy Lee <dorothyleel @hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, November 29,2010 10:21 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Why i heavens name do we need another grocery store in on France? We have Byerlys, Target and not to far away Cub and Rainbow. Please vote it down. Dorothy Lee 7320 York Ave South #104 . Jackie Hoogenakker V From: Joan Roisum <joan.roisum.czz6 @statefarm.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 4:34 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Whole Foods Hello: As a property owner within 1000 ft of the proposed Whole Foods, I am in support of the redevelopment. I would like to note that I do have concerns about the potential increased traffic levels in the area. As a 20 year small business owner the traffic on France Ave does seem to get worse each year. Thank you, Joan Roisum Joan Roisum, Agent State Farm Insurance Companies 7300 France Ave. So. STE 220 Edina, MN 55435 Phone: 952 - 835 -7188 Fax: 952 - 893 -9523 Providing Insurance and Financial Services: www.joanroisum.com 114VIO - I it ow e v l "CORPORP Iaaa 1Cf) REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. III. A From: Jeff Long Chief of Police Date: December 21St, 2010 Subject:, Eight Ford Crown Victoria Squad Cars — Police Department Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: December 13,-2010 October 31, 2011 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Elk River Ford 1. $183,057.12 2. 2. 3. 3. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: State of MN Cooperative Purchasing Agreement $183,057.12 Contract # 443719 Release A -174 5 GENERAL INFORMATION: Replacement of eight marked police vehicles per equipment replacement schedule. Vehicles: 2011 Ford Crown Victoria Police Interceptors Signature The Recommended Bid is X within budget not within PoI1'ce Department ager o Le v � �y • j��IRe BB �// REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. 111.13 From: Jeff Long Chief of Police Date: December 21St, 2010 Subject: Three'Chevrolet Equinoxes — Police Department Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: December 07, 2010 October 31, 2011 Companv Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet 1. $62,210.45 2. 2. 3. 3. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: _ State of MN Cooperative Purchasing Agreement $62,210.45 Contract # 443915 Release A -175 5 GENERAL INFORMATION: Replacement of three unmarked police vehicles per equipment replacement schedule. Vehicles: 2011 Chevrolet Equinox AWD Compact Utility Vehicles Signature The Recommended Bid is X within budget not withii P y / 1 -ce Deaartment a o e �,0 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF . $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. III. C. From: Jennifer L. Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director ° Date: Dec. 21, 2010 Subject: Council Chambers and Community Room Audio Systems Upgrades Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: Dec. 16, 2010 NA Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Alpha Video & Digital 1. $ 14,070.00 2. EPA Audio Visual, Inc. 2. $ 15,227.88 3. Touch point Logic 3. $ 16,558.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Alpha Video & Digital $ 14,070:00 GENERAL INFORMATION: The audio systems currently in the Council Chambers and Community Room are inadequate and cumbersome. The new Council Chambers audio system will allow for independent adjustment of the level available to the Council Chambers and broadcast feed. Currently, if an adjustment is made to increase the speaker volume in the Council Chambers, the broadcast is modulated. In addition, the room's center speaker will be replaced with line -array speakers with a subwoofer so that the direction ,and quality of sound can be better controlled. The system in the Community Room was that of the Council Chambers in the old City Hall and has reached the end of its useful life. The Crestron units will be replaced and cabling for microphones, controls and VGA functions installed in the floor. Touchpoint Logic will install the equipment and program the Crestron for $11,430. Total project cost will be $25,500. The 2010 Capital Improvement Program_ included a $29,000 allocation for this project. Signature The Recommended Bid is x within budget Communications & Marketing i !�- A. Ow e) • 1 -0 1968 REPORPRECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.A. From: John Wallin ® Action Finance Director F] Discussion Date: December 21, 2010 11 Information Subject: Resolution No. 2010 -123 Approving 2011 Budgets and 2011 Tax Levy ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution 2010 -123. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The attached resolution approves the budget and the levies for governmental and enterprise budgets. The 20 years of referendum levy were set in 1996 when the GO Park and Recreation Bonds, Series 1996B were issued and reset when those bonds were refunded by GO Park and Recreation Bonds Series 2005A. For both issues all levies were set by law at 105% of the corresponding annual debt service payments. The debt service fund is now sufficient to cover any foreseeable tax shortages and I would recommend canceling the portion of the 2010 levy in excess of the annual debt service payment. Future referendum levies remain at the 105% level and would require canceling a portion of the levy on an annual basis depending on the amount needed to maintain a sufficient debt service fund. The attached resolution includes the transfer from the General Fund to the Construction Fund of the 2009 General Fund surplus in accordance with the City's fund balance policy. The attached resolution also includes a levy for the payment of CIP Plan Bonds Series 2010A which refunded the HRA Public Project Bonds- Series 2002 reducing the levy for debt service by $102,111 from the proposed levy adopted in September. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2010 -123 RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -123 RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF EDINA FOR THE YEAR 2011, AND ESTABLISHING TAX LEVY FOR YEAR 2011, PAYABLE IN 2011 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA MINNESOTA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The Budgets for all Governmental Funds for the City of Edina for the calendar year 2011 are hereby adopted as after this set forth, and funds are hereby appropriated therefore: 2011 GOVERNMENTAL FUND BUDGETS Comm- Braemar Debt General HRA CDBG unication Police SR Memorial Service Construction Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES Property tax levy $21,004,000 $ $ $ $ $ $ 3,790,145 $ 992,072 $25,766,217 Reductions (315,000) (312,283) (627,283) Net tax revenue 20,689,000 3,790,145 679,789 25,158,934 Tax increments - 3,972,190 - - - 3,972,190 Special assessments - 1,817,069 397,289 2,214,358 Franchise Tees - 650,000 - - 650,000 Licenses and perils 2,309,490 - - - 2,309,490 Intergovernmental 757,000 161,303 104,760 4,490,000 5,513,063 Fees and charges 2,733,804 - - - 2,733,804 Fines and forfeitures 975,000 52,103 - 1,027,103 Investment income 115,919 122,000 24,000 600 300 33,900 102,611 399,330 Other revenue 343,000 - 66,500 - 3,000 - - 412,500 Transfers 765,100 - - 934,359 250,000 1,949,459 Debt issued - - 5,807,000 5,807,000 Other financing sources 55,000 55,000 TOTAL REVENUES AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $28,688,313 $ 4,094,190 $ 161,303 $ 740,500 $ 157,463 $ 3,300 $ 6,575,473 $11,781,689 $52,202,231 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES -BY FUNCTION General government $ 4,464,199 $ 4,694,945 $ 161,303 $ 807,755 $ - $ - $ - $ 110,000 $10,238,202 Public works 6,226,108 - - - - - 11,112,960 17,339,068 Public safety 14,141,593 141,592 722,587 15,005,772 Parks 8 recreation 3,856,413 - 7,500 - 692,000 4,555,913 Debt service - - - 6,640,188 - 6,640,188 Transfers 934,359 598,000 1,532,359 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $ 28,688,313 $ 5,629,304 $ 161,303 $ 807,755 $ 141,592 $ 7,500 $ 6,640,188 $13,235,547 $ 55,311,502 EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES - BY TYPE Personal services $19,976,953 $ 20,771 $ 10,484 $ 367,973 $ - $ $ $ $ 20,378,181 Contractual services 3,913,505 674,174 150,819 326,070 86,695 5,151,263 Commodities 1,571,563 - - 38,500 2,133 1,612,196 Central services 3,224,292 61,212 - 3,285,504 Equipment - - - - 927,587 927,587 Capital outlay 4,000,000 - 14,000 52,764 7,500 - 11,709,960 15,784,224 Debt service - - - - 6,640,188 - 6,640,188 Transfers 934,359 598,000 1,532,359 TOTAL EXPENDITURES AND OTHER FINANCING USES $28,688,313 $ 5,629,304 $ 161,303 $ 807,755 $ 141,592 $ 7,500 $ 6,640,188 $13,235,547 $55,311,502 CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE $ $ (1,535,114) $ $ (67,255) $ 15,871 $ (4,200) $ (64,715) $ (1,453,858) $ (3,109,271) f Section 2: The Budgets for all Enterprise Funds for the City of Edina for the calendar year 2011 are hereby adopted as after this set forth, and funds are hereby appropriated therefore: Section 3. That there is proposed to be levied upon all taxable real and personal property in the City of Edina a tax rate sufficient to produce the amounts hereinafter set forth: gymnasiums GENERAL FUND $ 21,004,000 2011 ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS $ 992,072 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF CIP PLAN BONDS (CITY $ 949,850 HALUPOLICE FACILITY) - SERIES 2010A Aquatic Golf LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES $ Art Edinborough Utilities Liquor Center Course Arena Center Centennial 431,544 STATION) - SERIES 2007A Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund DEBT Fund Fund Total REVENUES AND 25,170,380 TRANSFERSIN Operating revenues $ 15,803,920 $13,367,072 $ 818,800 $ 3,793,300 $ 1,443,800 $ 478,000 $ 1,742,500 $ 37,447,392 Intergovernmental 110,000 - - - - - - 110,000 Investment income 100,000 - 98,000 198,000 Other revenue - - - - - 22,000 - 22,000 Transfers 100,000 365,000 182,000 291,000 938,000 TOTAL REVENUES AND TRANSFERS IN $ 16,013,920 $13,367,072 $ 818,800 $ 3,893,300 $ 1,808,800 $ 682,000 $ 2,131,500 $ 38,715,392 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY FUNCTION Utilities $13,225,463 $ - $ - $ $ $ $ - $13,225,463 Liquor 12,338,481 - - - 12,338,481 Aquatic center - 761,098 - - - - 761,098 Golf course - 3,572,216 - 3,572,216 Community activity centers - - - - 1,782,952 699,188 2,404,002 4,886,142 Transfers 100,000 1,255,100 - 1,355,100 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT $13,325,463 $13,593,581 $ 761,098 $ 3,572,216 $ 1,782,952 $ 699,188 $ 2,404,002 $ 36,138,500 EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT - BY TYPE COGS $ 45,000 $10,103,558 $ 37,600 $ 356,300 $ 1,500 $ 24,000 $ 94,000 $10,661,958 Personal services 1,725,287 1,406,312 302,034 1,714,038 653,340 273,882 1,315,580 7,390,473 Contractual services 6,890,036 474,989 107,200 570,550 574,600 281,750 458,050 9,357,175 Commodities 1,040,500 64,834 76,350 351,200 85,500 53,200 277,600 1,949,184 Central services 539,640 206,448 23,364 137,928 42,912 38,856 98,772 1,087,920 Depreciation 1,805,000 82,340 198,000 427,000 340,000 27,500 160,000 3,039,840 Interest 1,180,000 - 16,550 15,200 85,100 - - 1,296,850 Other - - - - - - - Transfers 100,000 1,255,100 - - 1,355,100 TOTAL EXPENSES AND TRANSFERS OUT $ 13,325,463 $13,593,581 $ 761,098 $ 3,572,216 $ 1,782,952 $ 699,188 $ 2,404,002 $ 36,138,500 CHANGE IN NET ASSETS $ 2,688,457 $ (226,509) $ 57,702 $ 321,084 $ 25,848 $ (17,188) $ (272,502) $ 2,576,892 Section 3. That there is proposed to be levied upon all taxable real and personal property in the City of Edina a tax rate sufficient to produce the amounts hereinafter set forth: gymnasiums GENERAL FUND $ 21,004,000 CONSTRUCTION FUND - EQUIPMENT LEVY $ 992,072 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF CIP PLAN BONDS (CITY $ 949,850 HALUPOLICE FACILITY) - SERIES 2010A LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF EQUIPMENT CERTIFICATES $ 164,010 DEBT LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF HRA PUBLIC PROJECT $ 396,444 BONDS (GYMNASIUMS) - SERIES 2005A LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF CIP PLAN BONDS (FIRE $ 431,544 STATION) - SERIES 2007A LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY $ 1,232,460 DEBT TOTAL LEVY $ 25,170,380 L Section 4. That transfers from the General Fund Unappropriated reserves be made for the following purpose: TO FUND VARIOUS PROJECTS WITHIN THE $ 936,499 CONSTRUCTION FUND Section 5. That there is proposed to be levied upon all taxable real and personal property in the City of Edina, a tax rate sufficient to produce the amount below for the debt levy of the market value based referendum levy and canceling the portion of the levy not required to produce the following amount: GO PARK AND RECREATION BONDS SERIES 19966/2005A $ 615,837 Passed and adopted by the City Council on December 21, 2010. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 21, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk L r Cn lae0 RE PO RPRECO M MEN DATI O N To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.B. From: Sherry Engelman Community Health Admin ® Action Discussion Information Date: December 21, 2010 Subject: Renew Community Health Services Agreement With Bloomington ACTION REQUESTED: Renew the Community Health Services Agreement with Bloomington Public Health Division for $183,706 for calendar year 2011. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The 2011 Agreement cost remains the same as the 2010 Bloomington contract agreement of $183,706. The costs for these services are offset by the 2011 Community Health Services Grant funding of $119,006 and local general fund. Community Health Services are delivered to Edina residents of all ages through senior health promotions, vulnerable adult assessments, public health nurse clinics, high risk home assessments, and community health educational opportunities. In addition, Bloomington Public Health works closely with Edina schools and daycares to increase youth assets and help prevent high risk behaviors, they provide. outreach to new parents with high risk children, and administer the WIC Program, a food and nutrition program for pregnant women, infants and children in need. Services such as health screenings, health promotions and immunizations for elderly are coordinated with the Edina Senior Center and senior living complexes. The public health nurses also coordinate with Edina Police, Fire and Health Departments regarding vulnerable adult assessments, partner with the Edina Resource Center to connect residents with additional resources and services, and counsel with parish nurses and faith based communities. As requested by the City Council, the Community Health Committee met with Bloomington Public Health on October 19, 2010 to review and evaluate these community health services and programs. Bloomington gave a thorough presentation of the services and programs they provide and had staff on hand to answer questions. The Committee determined that Bloomington provides a variety of valuable programs and excellent service to the residents of Edina and voted unanimously to support continuing the contract services. See Attached Minutes. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the agreement. ATTACHMENTS: Community Health Services Agreement Community Health Committee, Draft Minutes, October 19, 2010 '-- - I AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF BLOOMINGTON AND EDINA TO PROVIDE COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of by and between the City of Bloomington, a Minnesota municipal corporation, in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota ( "Bloomington "), and the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota ( "Edina "). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Bloomington warrants and represents that its Division of Public Health is a duly certified public health agency operating in accordance with all applicable federal and state requirements; and WHEREAS, Bloomington's Division of Public Health provides community health services, including, but not limited to public health nursing services (including home visiting), public health clinics, health education, health promotion services, disease prevention and control, health planning, and program administration; and WHEREAS, Edina wishes to promote, support, and maintain the health of its residents by providing community health services such as health education, communicable disease programs, public health nursing services, health assessment, counseling, teaching, and evaluation in the community, home and clinic setting at a nominal fee to those making use of such services, and to contract with Bloomington for Bloomington, through its Division of Public Health, to provide such services to residents of Edina; and WHEREAS, the governing bodies of Bloomington and Edina are authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Section 145A.04, Subdivision 5, and by Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59, Subdivision 10, to provide community health services and to enter into agreements with each other for the providing by Bloomington of community health services to residents of Edina; and r - - -• WHEREAS, through this contractual arrangement the provision of community health services will enable Edina to document progress toward the achievement of statewide outcomes, as stated in Minnesota Statutes, Section 145A.10, Subdivision 5. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, and for consideration of the covenants hereinafter set forth, agree as follows: 1. Bloomington, through its Division of Public Health, agrees to provide residents of Edina with community health services (hereinafter called "Health Services "), which includes activities designed to protect and promote the health of the general population within a community health service area by emphasizing the prevention of disease, injury, disability, and preventable death through the promotion of effective coordination and use of community resources, and by extending health services into the community. 2. In addition, Bloomington will also provide Title V Maternal Child Health (MCH) services to women of childbearing age, infants, children and adolescents, and Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) services to qualifying women and children. The required services, reports and documentation for these programs are the responsibility of Bloomington and payment of these services is made directly to Bloomington from the Minnesota Department of Health. These grant dollars are not a part of this agreement. In 2011, the Title V MCH grant award is $34,663 and the TANF award is $39,995. 3. Bloomington agrees to provide community health services to the residents of Edina utilizing the same quality and kind of personnel, equipment and facilities as health services are provided and rendered to residents of Bloomington. 4. Bloomington shall provide the health services pursuant hereto on a confidential basis, using capable, trained professionals. 5. All Health Services to be rendered hereunder by Bloomington shall be rendered pursuant to and subject to public health policies, rules, and procedures now or hereafter, from time to time, adopted by the Bloomington City Council, and in full compliance with all applicable state and federal laws, provided, however, that (i) no policy, rule, or procedure hereafter adopted by the Bloomington City Council shall in an y way affect, modify, or change the obligations, duties, liabilities, or rights of the parties hereto as set out in this Agreement, or reduce or detract from the kind, quality, and quantity of Health Services to°be provided hereunder by Bloomington to residents of Edina, and (ii) all such policies, rules and procedures shall be uniformly applied to all persons receiving Health Services from Bloomington, whether residents of Edina, Bloomington, or any other municipality. Edina agrees to adopt the same policies, rules, and procedures as are from time to time adopted by Bloomington, if determined by Edina to be necessary or desirable to facilitate or regulate the provision of Health Services by Bloomington to residents of Edina pursuant hereto. 6. Edina agrees to pay Bloomington, for the provision of Health Services pursuant hereto, amounts and on terms as follows:. a. The annual sum of $183,706 shall be paid in quarterly payments of $45,926.50 to Bloomington within fifteen (15) days of the receipt by Edina of each of the reports to be given pursuant to Paragraph 63 hereof, subject, however, to the provisions of Paragraph 6.0 hereof. b. On April 15, July 15, and October 15, 2011 and on January 15, 2012, Bloomington shall send Edina a statement, certified by the person in charge of Bloomington's Division of Public Health as being true and correct, and covering the period of three (3) calendar months preceding the month in which the report is given, and setting forth, in such detail as Edina shall reasonably require, the numbers of persons served, the kinds of Health Services delivered, the locations where such services were delivered, and such other information as Edina shall reasonably request. c. Should any dispute arise over this Agreement, Edina shall pay for any undisputed charges for the three month period. 7. In the event Edina desires to inspect the financial books and records of Bloomington related to the providing of Health Services hereunder by Bloomington, Bloomington shall make its financial books and records available at the Bloomington City Hall for inspection and copying by Edina, or any agent, employee, or representative of Edina, at reasonable business hours. 8- At shall be the sole responsibility, of Bloomington to determine: the .qualificatioris, functions, training, and performance standards for all health, service personnel who render Health Services under this Agreement; provided, however, that Bloomington agrees that all such 41. personnel shall be capable, trained professionals. 9. Bloomington's Division of Public Health will communicate_ with Edina relative to Health Services to be performed hereunder by Bloomington, such communication to be in the form of reports, conferences, or consultations, as the respective Edina departments shall request. All reports relating to the providing of Health Services that are given by Bloomington's Division of Public Health to the Bloomington City Council or to the City Manager during the term of this Agreement shall also, and at the same time, be given to Edina. 10. Bloomington also agrees to send to Edina an annual report describing the activities performed and Health Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. Such report shall be in such detail and form as Edina'may reasonablyrequest. The annual report shall be sent with and in addition to the last quarterlyreport acquired by Paragraph 6.13 hereof. Also, atEdina's request, made not more than two (2) times during the term of this Agreement, responsible administrative officers of Bloomington's DivisionO Public Health shall attend meetings of the Edina City Council or appropriate board or commission to answer questions and give further information relative to the activities performed and Health Services rendered under this Agreement. 11. Bloomington hereby. agrees to maintain in force its present policy of comprehensive general liability insurance in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 466, and professional liability coverage in the amount of $1.5 million dollars ($1,500,000) per occurrence and $1.5 million dollars ($1,500,000) in aggregate for the term of this contract. Said policy shall be with an insurance company authorized to do business in Minnesota. If requested, the City of Bloomington will provide a certificate of insurance evidencing such coverage. Upon request, Edina may be named as an additional insured on Bloomington's comprehensive general liability insurance only. 12. Bloomington shall further require personal medical malpractice insurance coverage by its physicians and other licensed professionals with whom Bloomington has a contract for professional services. 13. This Agreement shall be for a period of from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2011, provided that either party may terminate the same by one hundred twenty (12 0) days written notice to the other. Upon such termination, all obligations and liabilities of the parties hereunder shall cease and terminate, except the provisions of Paragraph 12 hereof shall continue and survive such termination. Also, in the event of termination pursuant hereto, the quarterly payment next due shall be prorated and paid for only the period ended on the date of termination, and Bloomington shall send to Edina, within thirty (30) days after such termination, a report in the form of, and in lieu of, the annual report required by Paragraph 10 hereto, and Edina shall pay such reduced quarterly payment for the period ended on the date of termination, within fifteen (15) days after receipt of both such reports. 14. Bloomington and Edina understand and agree that each of them shall apply and qualify, independently and separately, for any and all grants, matching funds, and payment of all kinds from state, federal, and other governmental bodies relating to, or for the provision of, any or all of the Health Services, and any and all such grants, matching funds, and payments shall belong to the recipient and be used and applied as the recipient thereof shall determine, without regard to this Agreement. 15. All notices, reports, or demands required or permitted to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed to be given when delivered personally, to an officer of the party to which notice is being given, or when deposited in the United States mail in a sealed envelope, with registered or certified mail, postage prepaid thereon, addressed to the parties at the following addresses: To Bloomington: 1800 West Old Shakopee Road Bloomington, Minnesota 55431 Attention: City Manager I,. _11 To Edina: 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Attention: City Manager Such addresses may be changed by either party upon notice to the other party given as herein provided. 16. The parties agree to comply with the following laws and regulations: a. Edina agrees to comply with the Americans With Disabilities Act and agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Bloomington from costs, including but not limited to damages, attorney's fees and staff time, in any action or proceeding brought by third parties alleging a violation of ADA by Edina. Bloomington agrees to hold harmless and indemnify Edina from costs, including but not limited to damages, attorney's fees and staff time, in any action or proceeding brought by third parties alleging a violation of ADA by Bloomington. The parties duties to indemnify and hold harmless are subject to the limitations, immunities and defenses in Minnesota Statute Chapter 466. The City of Bloomington does not discriminate on the basis of disability in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its services, programs, or activities. Bloomington has designated coordinators to facilitate compliance with the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), as required by Section 35.107 of the U.S. Department of Justice regulations, and to coordinate compliance with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as mandated by Section 8.53 of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development regulations. For information contact the Human Services Division, City of Bloomington, 1800 Old West Shakopee Road, Bloomington, Minnesota 55431; telephone (952) 563 -8700; TTY: (952) 563 -8740. b. The parties agree to comply with the Minnesota State Human Rights Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 363A. 17. The parties agree that this Agreement shall not be assignable except at the written consent of both parties. J► 18. This Agreement represents the entire Agreement between Edina and Bloomington and supersedes and cancels any and all prior agreements or proposals, written or oral, between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof; and amendments, addenda, alterations, or modifications to the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by both parties. 19. Each party will comply with all applicable provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Chapter 13 of the Minnesota Statutes. 20. Bloomington agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Edina against any and all claims, liability, loss, damage, or expense, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising under the provisions of this Agreement and caused by or resulting from negligent acts or omissions of Bloomington and Bloomington employees or agents. Edina agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Bloomington against any and all claims, liability, loss, damage, or expense, including reasonable attorney's fees, arising under the provisions of this Agreement and caused by or resulting from negligent acts or omissions of Edina and Edina employees or agents. Both parties to this Agreement recognize that liability for any claims arising under this Agreement are subject to the provisions of the Minnesota Municipal Tort Claims Law; Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. In the event of any claims or actions filed against either party, nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to allow a claimant to obtain separate judgments or separate liability caps from the individual parties. 21. Bloomington and Edina agree to submit all claims, disputes and other matters in question between the parties arising out of or relating to this Agreement to mediation. The mediation shall be conducted through the Mediation Center, 1536 Hewitt Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota 55104. The parties hereto shall decide whether mediation shall be binding or non- binding. If the parties cannot reach agreement, mediation shall be non - binding. In the event mediation is unsuccessful, either party may exercise its legal or equitable remedies and may commence such action prior to the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed and their corporate seal to be affixed hereto the day and year first above written. Dated: CITY OF BLOOMINGTON: Dated: By: Reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. City Attorney Dated: Its Mayor Its City Manager CITY OF EDINA: Its Mayor Dated: By: Its City Manager Draft Minutes Edina Community Health Committee October 19, 2010, 6:30 — 8:30 pm Sherwood Room, Edina Senior Center Members Present: Mary Jo Kingston, Jan Johnson, Idelle Longman, Carolyn Peterson, Students Francesca Sifferlin and John Beuerlein Members Absent: Kumar Belani, Mark Johnson, Alan Lifson Guests: Karen Zeleznak, Rose Jost, Lisa Brodsky, Sue Sheridan, Karen Stanley WELCOME & CALL TO ORDER Chair Kingston welcomed members and called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes from the September 21, 2010 meeting were unanimously approved by a motion from Member Peterson and second from Member J. Johnson. GUEST SPEAKERS Lisa Brodsky, Bloomington Public Health Emergency Preparedness Coordinator, gave a presentation on the public health emergency preparedness services provided to the City of Edina. Key aspects include planning for ability to respond to public health emergencies, evaluating resident's ability to respond to emergencies, planning for and exercising distribution of medication, vaccines and supplies, developing and preparing methods to deliver emergency messages to the public, planning communication to reach special populations such as limited English speaking, seniors, people with disabilities, building relationships with Police, Fire and Emergency management. A volunteer Medical Reserve Corp was established and an emergency preparedness tool kit for faith based communities, Ready, Set, Go was developed. A community based tool kit for emergency preparedness is being developed. An example of public health emergency preparedness response is the recent H1NI outbreak. Response actions included coordination with the Minnesota Department of Health, public messages regarding importance of vaccination and antiviral distribution to individuals in priority groups including those uninsured and underinsured, and organizing and conducting timely mass vaccination clinics in local schools. Karen Zeleznak, Bloomington Public Health Director, gave a presentation on the community health and nursing services they provide to the City of Edina. Ms. Zeleznak gave a historical j perspective of Community Health Services (CHS) funding for city/county public health services. The designated funds must be directed to specific community health programs. Included in these G' services are Community Health Assessment, Adult and Senior Services, Help Me Grow Program (child development), Safety Net of Services, (qualification depends on income), Women's Health Program, Clinical and Immunization Services, Maternal Child Health, Health Promotion (targeting youth), Creating A Voice (youth assets) and Nurse Clinics (replaced Home Care Program). Also discussed were the quarterly and annual reports. Bloomington staff is involved with the school district, the Edina Resource Center, the Edina Senior Center and several community groups. Ms. Zeleznak discussed the Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP), Tri -City Partners activities, community readiness for kids not doing drugs and additional information about the varied programs and their impact on the community. Rose Jost, Bloomington Family Health Manager, reviewed efforts of Metro Alliance for Healthy Families, Help Me Grow Program and the Follow -Along Program for developing families. Ms. Jost also discussed working with youth via Tri -City Partners and Edina Sober Squad. -6 Karen Stanley, Bloomington Disease Prevention & Control/Clinical Services Manager, presented specific information on the Women, Infants and Children program and also the Sage Screening program for breast and cervical cancer. Ms. Stanley talked about the immunization funding, immunization for a lifetime, and immunization coordination with school nurses and child care centers. Sue Sheridan, Bloomington Health Activities Supervisor, discussed her work with the Edina Seniors Program, efforts toward independent senior living, and methods to find seniors in need of assistance. Work is coordinated with Edina police, fire and health departments, local churches, family members, and adult protection for the quickest delivery of assistant to needy seniors. Chair Kingston said Bloomington Public Health is an asset to Edina providing a high level of service to all residents, young and old. The Community Health Committee fully supports the professional efforts of Bloomington Public Health and highly endorses renewing services with them for 2011. A motion was made by Member Longman and seconded by Member J. Johnson to support continuing the contract services with Bloomington Public Health for Commnunity Health Services and also Public Health Emergency Preparedness Services for 2011. The vote was unanimous. Chair Kingston thanked Zeleznak and her staff for their presentations and for the wide variety of programs, community involvement, and excellent service they provide to the City of Edina. STATEWIDE HEALTH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Committee members received a hand out on SHIP update of health activities in Edina. Ruth Tripp, Health Specialist and SHIP Grant Coordinator from Bloomington Public Health prepared the update for the meeting. To date, efforts have been focused on schools and community and now include activities in worksites and health care settings. They are encouraging worksite employees to increase physical activity during the work day by "Energize At Work ". Local walking trail brochures have been developed and employers are encouraged to provide on -site exercise equipment for their employees. A two day Active Living Workshop is being planned and a vision for city walkability is being reviewed along with Safe Routes to School program. Day Care initiatives include the "LANA" nutrition program and "I Am Moving, I Am Learning" physical activity program. Future activities will focus on recruiting additional worksites and healthcare settings to participate in more physical activity and improved nutrition. SCHSAC ANNUAL MEETING REPORT Member Longman gave a summary of the recent SCHSAC meeting which was themed "Looking, Leading, Moving Ahead ". Topics presented at the conference included public health informatics, public health accreditation and health reform, Minnesota's "new normal" demographics, healthy workplace, mental health, and healthy eating. HEALTH STAFF REPORTS Liaison Engelman commented on the success of the new Centennial Lakes Farmers Market. Vendors will be surveyed for their ideas for improvements to the market. Comments were also made regarding Edina's status as a governor's "Fit City" and possible promotion on the City Web site with a link to SHIP initiatives. Committee members favored the idea. COMMUNITY COMMENT None presented. OTHER BUSINESS None ADJOURNMENT Motion was made by Member Longman and seconded by Member. Peterson o. adjourn. Vote to adjourn was unanimous. Meeting adjourned at 8:30 pm. Sherry Engelman Next Meeting: March 15, 2011 2010 Meeting Dates: March 16 May 18 September 21 October 19 0 1 \� ss �Z REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.C. From: Sherry Engelman Community Health Admin ® Action Discussion Information Date: December 21, 2010 Subject: Renew Public Health Bloomington Emergency Preparedness Agreement With ACTION REQUESTED: Renew the 2011 Public Health Emergency Preparedness Agreement with Bloomington Public Health for $38,384. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: In 2010, the Bloomington Public Health Preparedness Agreement cost was $38,731. The 2011 Agreement cost of $38,384 is less because 1) Public Health Preparedness grant allocations were reduced and 2) Edina will retain portions of the grant money specifically for expenses generated by Edina staff for employee training, ongoing emergency planning, public education and administrative duties. This is the nineth year of the Agreement with Bloomington and also of the Public Health Preparedness Grants. We are required to use the grant money for public health readiness and emergency preparedness planning and training. Currently, the work focus is a metro -wide regional approach to coordinate planning efforts for business continuity of operations, public health preparedness and pandemic influenza response, at -risk populations and mass dispensing. The cost of this agreement is offset by grant money totaling $48,384 received from the Minnesota Department of Health, as awarded by the Center for Disease Control. The Community Health Committee met with Bloomington Public Health on October 19, 2010 to review and evaluate these public health emergency preparedness services and programs. The Committee voted unanimously to support continuing these comprehensive services with Bloomington to prepare Edina for public health emergencies. See Attached Minutes. The City Attorney reviewed and approved the agreement. ATTACHMENTS: Public Health Emergency Preparedness & Response to Bioterrorism Agreement Community Health Committee, Draft Minutes, October 19, 2010 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF BLOOMINGTON AND EDINA FOR PUBLIC HEALTH PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE TO BIOTERRORISM THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into this day of , by and between the City of Bloomington, a Minnesota municipal corporation, in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota ( "Bloomington "), and the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota ( "Edina "). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Bloomington warrants and represents that its Division of Public Health is a duly certified public health agency operating in accordance with all applicable federal and state requirements; and WHEREAS, Bloomington's Division of Public Health provides public health emergency preparedness services to respond to bioterrorism, infectious diseases, and other threats to public health including, but not limited to coordination, assessment, planning and exercise, response, surveillance, Health Alert Network (HAN), and training (hereinafter referred to as "PH Emergency Preparedness Services "); and provides services and activities to improve the mass dispensing of medicines and medical supplies through the Cities Readiness Initiative (hereinafter referred to as "CRI Duties "); and WHEREAS, Edina wishes to promote, support, and maintain the health of its residents by providing public health emergency preparedness, and Cities Readiness Initiative planning activities, and to contract with Bloomington, through its Division of Public Health, to provide such services to residents of Edina; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, and for consideration of the covenants hereinafter set forth, agree as follows: A. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be from August 10, 2010 through August 9, 2011, provided that either party may terminate the same by sixty (60) days' written notice to the other. In the event of termination pursuant hereto, the quarterly payment next due shall be prorated and paid for only the period ended on the date of termination, and Edina shall pay such reduced quarterly payment for the period ended on the date of termination, within fifteen (15) days after receipt of Bloomington's invoice. B. Bloomington, through its Division of Public Health, agrees to provide residents of Edina with the following PH Emergency Preparedness Services: Standing Duties 1. Bloomington shall, on an ongoing basis, maintain necessary mutual aid agreements, memorandums of understanding, or other documents to ensure a timely and appropriate all- hazard response to public health emergencies including natural or man -made disasters, incidents or events. 2. Bloomington shall plan and coordinate preparedness and response efforts at the local and regional level with hospitals, healthcare providers, Emergency Medical Services, emergency management and other response partners to share expertise, coordinate training and exercises, and evaluate response to incidents. 3. Bloomington shall be familiar with regional distribution node plans and be prepared to receive stage, store, track, distribute, dispense and account for public health assets in preparation for or during a public health emergency. 4. Bloomington shall reply to all STATE Health Alerts and Health Alert Updates within one (1) hour of receipt. Bloomington shall transmit the STATE'S Health Alerts and Health Alert Updates to local HAN recipients as requested by the STATE within one (1) hour of receipt. 5. Bloomington shall reply to all STATE Health Advisories and Health Advisory Updates within twenty -four (24) hours of receipt. Bloomington shall transmit the STATE Health Advisories and Health Advisory Updates within twenty four (24) hour of receipt. 6. All exercises developed by Bloomington shall be in accordance with Homeland Security Exercise Evaluation Program (HSEEP) standards. Bloomington shall submit an After Action Report and Improvement Plan (AAR/IP) to the OEP (Office of Emergency Preparedness) Exercise Coordinator for each exercise conducted at any level with federal funds. The notification form is located on the MDH Workspace and shall be submitted at the time of the initial planning conference and not later than a minimum of thirty (30) days prior to the exercise. The AAR/IP shall be completed in accordance with HSEEP standards and Bloomington shall monitor, implement and re -test by exercise all corrective actions for each exercise. 7. For all exercises, Bloomington shall: a. Submit the exercise notification data online no later than 30 days before the exercise to this address: fhttp: / /www.health.state.mn.us /oep /surveys /exercises.cfml b. Follow the HSEEP guidance to plan, conduct, and evaluate the exercise. c. Complete an after action report and improvement plan following the HSEEP format within 60 days of the exercise and send an electronic copy to the Exercise Coordinator in the OEP. [elizabeth.tangwall @state.mn.us] d. Monitor the completion of the corrective actions from the exercise improvement plan and retest. 8. For significant public health incidents as determined locally, Bloomington shall: e. Submit the incident notification data no later than two weeks after the start of the incident. [http: / /www.health. state. mn.us /oep /surveys /exercises.cfml f. Complete an after action report and improvement plan following the HSEEP format at the end of the incident and send an electronic copy to the Exercise Coordinator in OEP. [ elizabeth.tangwall @state.mn.us] g. Monitor the completion of the corrective actions from the incident improvement plan and retest. 9. Bloomington shall designate a MN Responds Medical Reserve Corp Administrator; and coordinate with regional healthcare system preparedness efforts to recruit, train, and deploy the volunteers in accordance with state and federal law. Programmatic Duties 10. Bloomington shall submit a plan for updating the local jurisdiction's pandemic influenza operating plan by 30 November 2010. 11. Bloomington shall conduct a minimum of two (2) Staff Alert and Notification tests with staff assembly. One test must be completed before November 30, 2010 and the second test before May 30, 2011. The test can be a drill or an exercise, or it may be demonstrated by a response to a real incident. This duty can be met using a real incident. One of the two tests must be unannounced and conducted outside of business hours. For each test, the Bloomington shall: a. Notify the public health agency senior management staffs, who are individuals that can respond and make decisions about appropriate response and interaction with partners. b. Convene the senior management staff within one (1) hour of the notification. 12. Bloomington shall conduct a minimum of two (2) HAN exercises that include (but are not limited to): hospitals, clinics, long term care, emergency managers, veterinarians and those, according to agency discretion, apparent and necessary to ensure an efficient response to any public health emergency. Bloomington shall monitor the acknowledgement response times and each exercise must achieve a rate of 90% or more from each of the partner organizations within one (1) hour. One exercise must be conducted before November 30, 2010 and the second before May 30, 2011. This grant duty can be met using a real incident. 13. Bloomington shall have a Health and Medical Plan that includes the supportive documentation for Mass Prophylaxis Dispensing and supply distribution that is consistent with current state guidance posted on the STATE Workspace and federal requirements that are detailed in the Local Technical Assistance Review (LTAR). Bloomington shall address deficiencies from the 2009 -2010 STATE review of local mass dispensing plans. 14. Bloomington shall conduct ongoing capacity building training specific to functions of implementing a mass prophylaxis campaign. Bloomington shall attend Real Opt training for computer modeling and other mass prophylaxis related training provided or directed by the STATE. Bloomington shall incorporate information from the training into the Mass Prophylaxis Plan. 15. Bloomington will make supporting documentation /plans available for review by the STATE. 16. Bloomington shall participate in the development of a Minnesota -based approach to comprehensive hazard vulnerability assessment, including attention to documenting response needs assessment, and a resource assessment for local jurisdictions. This may include one or more of the following activities as directed by the STATE: serving on an advisory committee, participating in piloting the assessment tool, providing feedback on the proposed plan, or attending a training session. CRI Duties 17. Bloomington shall schedule a local CRI assessment with the OEP CRI Coordinator on or before 1 March 2011. Bloomington shall submit the local CRI Plan to the STATE a minimum of three (3) weeks prior to the scheduled assessment. Plans shall be written and formatted as directed by the STATE. Plans shall be in PDF format and shall be submitted on a CD by certified mail as directed by the STATE. Paper copies will not be accepted. 18. Bloomington shall participate in an annual assessment of the local CRI program using the LTAR tool to be conducted by either the STATE or federal Strategic National Stockpile (SNS) program staff. The assessment is to be completed by 30 April 2011. 19. Bloomington shall obtain and maintain a passing score of 79% or higher on their CRI assessment. If Bloomington receives a score of less than 79 %, they will participate in a technical visit with the CRI Public Health Preparedness Consultant to address problem areas. 20. Bloomington shall complete a minimum of three (3) Division of Strategic National Stockpile (DSNS) drills and one (1) regional full -scale or regional functional exercise during the grant performance period of 10 August 2010 to 9 August 2011 in accordance with the following: a) Bloomington must conduct a minimum of three (3) different DSNS drills during the period of 10 August 2010 to 9 August 2011. Each drill shall be of a different type. Bloomington may not complete the same type of drill more than one (1) time. There are two (2) suites of separate modular drills from which Bloomington shall conduct the three (3) drills. Bloomington shall consult the CDC website for specific drill information and requirements. i) The first suite of drills consists of resource allocation game, distribution tool intended to be used as a tabletop exercise, and decision - making evaluation tool. ii) The second suite of drills consists of staff call down, site activation, facility setup, and dispensing and /or modeling of throughput. b) Bloomington shall conduct or participate in at least one (1) regional full -scale or regional functional exercise that tests key components in mass /prophylaxis dispensing plans in the CRI Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) that includes all pertinent jurisdictional leadership and emergency support function leads, planning and operation staff and all applicable personnel. c) Bloomington shall submit the resulting applicable exercise data collection worksheet(s) and after action report(s), to the DSNS Program Preparedness Branch (PPB) mailbox (sns_ppb @cdc.gov) by 9 November 2011. All scheduled exercises and documents should be posted to LLIS or NEXS (if access is available). 21. Bloomington shall participate in other activities including serving on designated committees relating to the SNS or the CRI as directed by the STATE or CDC. 22. Bloomington shall participate in planning and evaluation meetings and other activities required for the postal distribution plan. 23. Bloomington shall complete the STATE exercise requirements which include Notification and After Action Report/Improvement Plan for all CRI Drills in addition to submission of exercise report data to CDC. The Notification form and AAR /IP shall be submitted to the OEP Exercise Coordinator, C. Payment. Edina agrees to pay Bloomington $25,665 for PH Emergency Preparedness Services, and $12,719 for CRI Duties during the term of this Agreement, for the total amount of $38,384, paid in quarterly installments of $9,596.00, according to the following terms: a. Bloomington shall quarterly bill Edina for PH Emergency Preparedness Services and CRI Duties. Payment shall be made within fifteen (15) days of receipt by Edina of Bloomington's invoice. b. In the event Edina desires to inspect the financial books and records of Bloomington related to the providing of PH Emergency Preparedness Services and CRI Duties by Bloomington, Bloomington shall make its financial books and records available at the Bloomington City Hall for inspection and copying by Edina, or any agent, employee, or representative of Edina, at reasonable business hours. 24. It shall be the sole responsibility of Bloomington to determine the qualifications, functions, training, and performance standards for all health service personnel who render PH Emergency Preparedness Services and CRI Duties under this Agreement. 25. Bloomington's Division of Public Health will communicate with Edina relative to PH Emergency Preparedness Services and CRI Duties to be performed hereunder by Bloomington, such communication to be in the form of reports, conferences, or consultations, as they request. 26. At Edina's request, made not more than two (2) times during the term of this Agreement, responsible administrative officers of Bloomington's Division of Public Health shall attend meetings of the Edina City Council or appropriate board or commission to answer questions and give further information relative to the activities performed and PH Emergency Preparedness Services and CRI Duties rendered under this Agreement. 27. Bloomington hereby agrees to maintain in force its present policy of comprehensive general liability insurance in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 466, and professional liability coverage in the amount of $1.5 million dollars ($1,500,000) per occurrence and $1.5 million dollars ($1,500,000) in aggregate for the term of this contract. D. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 28. The parties agree to comply with the following laws and regulations: a. ADA. Edina agrees to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) and agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the City of Bloomington from costs, including but not limited to damages, attorney's fees and staff time, in any action or proceeding brought by third parties alleging a violation of ADA by Edina. Bloomington agrees to hold harmless and indemnify Edina from costs, including but not limited to damages, attorney's fees and staff time, in any action or proceeding brought by third parties alleging a violation of ADA by Bloomington. The City of Bloomington does not discriminate on the basis of disability in the admission or access to, or treatment or employment in, its services, programs, or activities. Bloomington has designated coordinators to facilitate compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as required by Section 35.107 of the U.S. Department of Justice regulations, and to coordinate compliance with Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as mandated by Section 8.53 of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development regulations. For information contact the Human Services Division, City of Bloomington, 1800 Old West Shakopee Road, Bloomington, Minnesota 55431; telephone (952) 563 -8700; TTY: (952) 563 -8740. b. Human Rights. The parties agree to comply with the Minnesota State Human Rights Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 363A. c. Non - Assignment. The parties agree this Agreement shall not be assignable except at the written consent of both parties. d. Scope of Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire Agreement between Edina and Bloomington and supersedes and cancels any and all prior agreements or proposals, written or oral, between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof; and amendments, addenda, alterations, or modifications to the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be in writing and signed by both parties. e. Data Practices. Each party will comply with all applicable provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Chapter 13 of the Minnesota Statutes. 29. Indemnification. a. Edina shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless Bloomington, its officials, employees and agents, from any and all claims, causes of action, lawsuits, damages, losses, or expenses, including attorney fees, arising out of or resulting from Edina's (including its officials, agents, employees or volunteers) performance of the duties required under this Agreement, provided that any such claim, damages, loss or expense is attributable to bodily injury, sickness, diseases or death or to injury to or destruction of property including the loss of use resulting therefrom and is caused in whole or in part by any negligent act or omission or willful misconduct of Edina. b. Bloomington shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless Edina, its officials, employees and agents, from any and all claims, causes of action, lawsuits, damages, losses, or expenses, including attorney fees, arising out of or resulting from Bloomington's (including its officials, agents, employees or volunteers) performance of the duties required under this Agreement, provided that any such claim, damages, loss or expense is attributable to bodily injury, sickness, diseases or death or to injury to or destruction of property including the loss of use resulting therefrom and is caused in whole or in part by any negligent actor omission or willful misconduct of Bloomington. c. Liability for Edina and Bloomington shall be governed by the provisions of the Municipal Tort Claims Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. Nothing in this Section is intended or shall operate as a waiver of any defenses or limitations on liability available under the Municipal Tort Claims Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. The provisions of this Section are not intended for the benefit of any third party. 30. Mediation. The parties agree to submit all claims, disputes and other matters in question between the parties arising out of or relating to this Agreement to mediation. The mediation shall be conducted through the Mediation Center, 1536 Hewitt Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota 55104. The parties hereto shall decide whether mediation shall be binding or non - binding. If the parties cannot reach agreement, mediation shall be non - binding. In the event mediation is unsuccessful, either party may exercise its legal or equitable remedies and may commence such action prior to the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set their hands on the dates written below. CITY OF BLOOMINGTON: Dated: By: Dated: Its City Manager Reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. City Attorney CITY OF EDINA: By: Its Mayor Dated: By: Its City Manager Draft Minutes Edina Community Health Committee October 19, 2010, 6:30 — 8:30 pm Sherwood Room, Edina Senior Center Members Present: Mary Jo Kingston, Jan Johnson, Idelle Longman, Carolyn Peterson, Students Francesca Sifferlin and John Beuerlein Members Absent: Kumar Belani, Mark Johnson, Alan Lifson Guests: Karen Zeleznak, Rose Jost, Lisa Brodsky, Sue Sheridan, Karen Stanley WELCOME & CALL TO ORDER Chair Kingston welcomed members and called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes from the September 21, 2010 meeting were unanimously approved by a motion from Member Peterson and second from Member J. Johnson. GUEST SPEAKERS Lisa Brodsky, Bloomington Public Health Emergency Preparedness Coordinator, gave a presentation on the public health emergency preparedness services provided to the City of Edina. Key aspects include planning for ability to respond to public health emergencies, evaluating resident's ability to respond to emergencies, planning for and exercising distribution of medication, vaccines and supplies, developing and preparing methods to deliver emergency messages to the public, planning communication to reach special populations such as limited English speaking, seniors, people with disabilities, building relationships with Police, Fire and Emergency management. A volunteer Medical Reserve Corp was established and an emergency preparedness tool kit for faith based communities, Ready, Set, Go was developed. A community based tool kit for emergency preparedness is being developed. An example of public health emergency preparedness response is the recent H1N1 outbreak. Response actions included coordination with the Minnesota Department of Health, public messages regarding importance of vaccination and antiviral distribution to individuals in priority groups including those uninsured and underinsured, and organizing and conducting timely mass vaccination clinics in local schools. Karen Zeleznak, Bloomington Public Health Director, gave a presentation on the community health and nursing services they provide to the City of Edina. Ms. Zeleznak gave a historical perspective of Community Health Services (CHS) funding for city/county public health services. The designated funds must be directed to specific community health programs. Included in these services are Community Health Assessment, Adult and Senior Services, Help Me Grow Program (child development), Safety Net of Services, (qualification depends on income), Women's Health Program, Clinical and Immunization Service$, Maternal Child Health, Health Promotion (targeting youth), Creating A Voice (youth assets) and Nurse Clinics (replaced Home Care Program). Also discussed were the quarterly and annual reports. Bloomington staff is involved with the school district, the Edina Resource Center, the Edina Senior Center and several community groups. Ms. Zeleznak discussed the Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP), Tri -City Partners activities, community readiness for kids not doing drugs and additional information about the varied programs and their impact on the community. Rose Jost, Bloomington Family Health Manager, reviewed efforts of Metro Alliance for Healthy Families, Help Me Grow Program and the Follow -Along Program for developing families. Ms. Jost also discussed working with youth via Tri -City Partners and Edina Sober Squad. Karen Stanley, Bloomington Disease Prevention & Control/Clinical Services Manager, presented specific information on the Women, Infants and Children program and also the Sage Screening program for breast and cervical cancer. Ms. Stanley talked about the immunization funding, immunization for a lifetime, and immunization coordination with school nurses and child care centers. Sue Sheridan, Bloomington Health Activities Supervisor, discussed her work with the Edina Seniors Program, efforts toward independent senior living, and methods to find seniors in need of assistance. Work is coordinated with Edina police, fire and health departments, local churches, family members, and adult protection for the quickest delivery of assistant to needy seniors. Chair Kingston said Bloomington Public Health is an asset to Edina providing a high level of service to all residents, young and old. The Community Health Committee fully supports the professional efforts of Bloomington Public Health and highly endorses renewing services with them for 2011. A motion was made by Member Longman and seconded by Member J. Johnson to support continuing the contract services with Bloomington Public Health for Community Health Services and also Public Health Emergency Preparedness Services for 2011. The vote was unanimous. Chair Kingston thanked Zeleznak and her staff for their presentations and for the wide variety of programs, community involvement, and excellent service they provide to the City of Edina. STATEWIDE HEALTH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Committee members received a hand out on SHIP update of health activities in Edina. Ruth Tripp, Health Specialist and SHIP Grant Coordinator from Bloomington Public Health prepared the update for the meeting. To date, efforts have been focused on schools and community and now include activities in worksites and health care settings. They are encouraging worksite employees to increase physical activity during the work day by "Energize At Work ". Local walking trail brochures have been developed and employers are encouraged to provide on -site exercise equipment for their employees. A two day Active Living Workshop is being planned and a vision for city walkability is being reviewed along with Safe Routes to School program. Day Care initiatives include the "LANA" nutrition program and "I Am Moving, I Am Learning" physical activity program. Future activities will focus on recruiting additional worksites and healthcare settings to participate in more physical activity and improved nutrition. SCHSAC ANNUAL MEETING REPORT Member Longman gave a summary of the recent SCHSAC meeting which was themed "Looking, Leading, Moving Ahead ". Topics presented at the conference included public health informatics, public health accreditation and health reform, Minnesota's "new normal" demographics, healthy workplace, mental health, and healthy eating. HEALTH STAFF REPORTS Liaison Engelman commented on the success of the new Centennial Lakes Farmers Market. Vendors will be surveyed for their ideas for improvements to the market. Comments were also made regarding Edina's status as a governor's "Fit City" and possible . promotion on the City Web site with a link to SHIP initiatives. Committee members favored the idea. COMMUNITY COMMENT None presented. OTHER BUSINESS None ADJOURNMENT Motion was made by Member Longman and seconded by Member Peterson to adjourn. Vote to adjourn was unanimous. Meeting adjourned at 8:30 pm. Sherry Engelman Next Meeting: March 15, 2011 2010 Meeting Dates: March 16 May 18 September 21 October 19 ACTION REQUESTED: Correct the errors on the Art Center Board's proposed 2011 Fees and Charges document as originally shown on Edina Art Center Resolution No. 2010 -119. The corrections are highlighted below. ART CENTER REPORURECOMMEN ®ATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV. D. From: John Keprios, Directo Park and Recreation Dep rtment @$7.50 hour ® Action Discussion Information Date: December 21, 2010 Subject: Resolution No. 2010 -124 Setting Art Center Fees ACTION REQUESTED: Correct the errors on the Art Center Board's proposed 2011 Fees and Charges document as originally shown on Edina Art Center Resolution No. 2010 -119. The corrections are highlighted below. ART CENTER Hours 2009 Hours 2010 Hours 2011 Hours to $12 an Hour Workshop Price @$7.50 hour @7.75 hour $8.00 hour Workshop (parent/child) NM /M NM /M NM /M special Family Rate $5 an hour 30 $225/$202 $233/$210 $240/$216 $360/$324 $150/$135 24 $180/$162 $186/$167 $192/$173 $288/$259 $120/$108 22 $165/$148 $171/$154 $176/$158 $264/$238 $110/$99 20 $150/$135 $155/$140 $160/$144 $240/$216 $100/$90 18 $135/$121 $140/$126 $144/$130 $216/$194 $90/$81 16 $120/$108 $124/$112 $128/$115 $192/$173 $80/$72 15 $113/$102 $116/$105 $1201$108 $180/$162 $75/$67 14 $105/$94 $109/$98 $112/$101 $168/$151 $70/$63 12 $90/$81 $93/$84 $96/$86 $144/$130 $60/$54 10 $75/$67 $78/$70 $80/$72 $120/$108 $50/$45 9 $68/$61 $70/$63 $72/$65 $108/$97 $45/$40 8 $60/$54 $62/$56 $64/$58 $96/$86 $40/$36 7 $53/$48 $54/$49 $56/$50 $84/$76 $35$31 6 $45/$40 $47$42 1 $48/$43 1 $72/$65 $30/$27 NM /M — Non - Member /Member EDINA ART CENTER MEMBERSHIPS 2010 2011 Annual Family Membership Resident members $5 0 $45.00 $45.00 Annual Individual Membershi Resident members $5 0 $30.00 $30.00 INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: At the December 7, 2010 meeting, the City Council identified a discrepancy in the proposed 2011 Art Center Fees and Charges document in row three that shows the fee for 22 hours of classes as shown in the original document below. ART CENTER Hours 2009 Hours @$7.50 hour NM /M 2010 Hours @7.75 hour NM /M 2011 Hours to $8.00 hour NM /M $12 an Hour Workshop Workshop Price (parent/child) special Family Rate $5 an hour 30 $225/$202 $233/$210 $240/$216 $360/$324 $150/$135 24 $180/$162 $186/$167 $1921$173 $288/$259 $120/$108 22 $165/$148 $171/$164 $176/$158 $264/$238 $110/$99 20 $150/$135 $155/$140 $1601$144 $240/$216 $100/$90 18 $135/$121 $140/$126 $144/$130 $216/$194 $90/$81 16 $120/$108 $124/$112 $128/$115 $192/$173 $80/$72 15 $113/$102 $116/$105 $120/$108 $180/$162 $75/$67 14 $105/$94 $109/$98 $1121$101 $168/$151 $70/$63 12 $90/$81 $93/$84 $96/$86 $144/$130 $60/$54 10 $75/$67 $78/$70 $80/$72 $120/$108 $50/$45 9 $68/$61 $70/$63 $72/$65 $108/$97 $45/$40 8 $60/$54 $621$56 $64/$58 $96/$86 $40/$36 7 $53/$48 $54/$49 $56/$50 $84/$76 $35$31 6 $45/$40 $47$42 $48/$43 $72/$65 $30/$27 NM /M — Non - Member /Member EDINA ART CENTER MEMBERSHIPS 2010 2011 Annual Family Membership Resident members $5 0 $45.00 $45.00 Annual Individual Membershi Resident members $5 0 $30.00 $30.00 At the December 7th meeting, the error was assumed to be in column four under the proposed 2011 Hours to $8.00 hour NM /M and therefore, the Council changed the figures shown from $1761$158 to $176/$168. We have learned that the typographical error was actually in column three (2010 Hours) which shows $171/$164; whereas, it should read $171/$154. We apologize for the error. ATTACHMENTS: 1) Resolution No. 2010 -124 Corrected 2011 Art Center Fees and Charges RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -124 CORRECTED 2011 ART CENTER FEES AND CHARGES BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby approve and set the following 2011 corrected Art Center Fees and Charges (corrections highlighted). ART CENTER Hours 2009 Hours 2010 Hours 2011 Hours to $12 an Hour Workshop Price @$7.50 hour @7.75 hour $8.00 hour Workshop (parent/child) NM /M NM /M NM /M special Family 120 Rate $5 an hour 30 $225/$202 $233/$210 $2401$216 $360/$324 $150/$135 24 $180/$162 $186/$167 $192/$173 $288/$259 $120/$108 22 $165/$148 $171/$154 $176/$158 $264/$238 $110/$99 $150/$135 $155/$140 $160/$144 $240/$216 $100/$90 18 $135/$121 $140/$126 $144/$130 $216/$194 $90/$81 16 $120/$108 $124/$112 $128/$115 $192/$173 $80/$72 15 $113/$102 $116/$105 $120/$108 $180/$162 $75/$67 14 $105/$94 $109/$98 $112/$101 $168/$151 $70/$63 12 $90/$81 $93/$84 $96/$86 $144/$130 $60/$54 10 $75/$67 $78/$70 $80/$72 $120/$108 $50/$45 9 $68/$61 $70/$63 $72/$65 $108/$97 $45/$40 8 $60/$54 $62/$56 $64/$58 $96/$86 $40/$36 7 $53/$48 $54/$49 $56/$50 $84/$76 $35$31 6 $45/$40 $47$42 $48/$43 $72/$65 F $30/$27 NM /M — Non - Member /Member EDINA ART CENTER MEMBERSHIPS 2010 2011 Annual Family Membership Resident members $5 0 $45.00 $45.00 Annual Individual Membershi Resident members $5 0 $30.00 $30.00 Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Dated this 21" day of December, 2010. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 21, 2010 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 o� \�v •j/ 0 \C�RR8B e REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.E. From: John Wallin Finance Director ® Action ❑ Discussion E Information Date: December 7, 2010 Subject: Second Reading Ordinance No 2010 -20 Amending Code Section 185 Schedule A - Increasing Certain Fees ACTION REQUESTED: Discuss the proposed fees and charges to be adopted by Ordinance. Approve second reading of Ordinance 2010 -20 Amending Code Section 185-Schedule A — Increasing Certain Fees. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are the following schedules for fees and charges to be adopted by ordinance proposed for 2011. The Minneapolis City Council has now adopted their water rates for 2011. The rate confirms the amount used to calculate the proposed rate for the Morningside area's water rate for the first reading of this ordinance. All other fees are also the same as was presented for first reading. The fees that are proposed to change from 2010 to 2011 are in bold. ATTACHMENT: 1) Schedule of General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 — Schedule A. 2) Schedule of General Fund revenues as they appear in the budget. 3) Ordinance No. 2010 -20 amending Code Section 185 Increasing Certain Fees. City of Edina SECTION SUB6r-CTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE Propr 2010 2011 General Code Provisions and Administration 185:01 -Schedule A . AMOUNT DEPT REV. 195 195.03 Registration of Domestic Partners 25.00 25.00 Clerk Certified Copies of Registration 10.00 10.00 Clerk Amendments to Domestic Partners.or 10.00 10.00 Clerk _ Notice of Termination of Domestic-Partners - 200 200.04 Public Dance Permit 54.00 54.00 Clerk - 4137. 215 215.04 Bingo Occasion,:Gambling. Device, - 15.00 15.00 per permit Clerk 4313 Raffle Permit 220 220.04 Machine or Amusement Device-License 15.00 15.00 annually per establishment, plus Health 4176 (15.00 15.00 per machine Health 4176 225 225.04 Special Events Application Fee 53.50.. 60.00 Clerk 4125 300 300.02 Subd 2 Redemption of Impounded Animals 30.00 30.00 per day for.feeding & care, any veterinarian services and'impounding Police 4331 fee of: 40.00 40.00 a) If animal has not been impounded within one year prior to the date Police 4331 of impounding 65.00 65.00 b) If animal has been impounded once within the year prior to the date Police -. 4331 of impounding 115.00. 115.00 c) If animal has been impounded twice or more within one year prior Police 4331 to the date of impounding 300 300.02 Subd 3 Disposal of Animal 40.00 40.00 per animal Police 4331 300 300.03 Subd. 3 Dog License 15.00 15.00 per dog Police 4120 10.00 10.00 per neutered dog Late charge after March 1 10.00 10.00 Police: 4120 300 300.03 Subd. 4 Duplicate Dog License Tag :6.00 6.00 per duplicate tag Police'_'- 4120 - 300 300.04 Subd. 2 Commercial, Kennel License 55.00 55.00 peryear Police -4174 300 300.15 - Permit for Extra Dogs or 'Cats 100.00 100.00 Police-.--' . 4120 300 300.17 Subd.6A . Dangerous Dog 100.00 100.00 Registration fee Police 4120 405 405.01 Landscaping, Screening, or Erosion 100.00 100.00 Planning 4361 Control Site Plan Permit 410 410.02 Subd. 1 Building Permit If total valuation of work is: Then amount is: $ 1 to 500 23.50 23.50 ' Building 4111 501 to 2,000 23.50 23.50 ' for first $500 plus Building . 41 -11 3.05 3.05 for each additional $100 or fraction thereof to and including $2,000 Building 4111 2,001 to 25.000 69.25 69.25 ' for first $2,000 plus. Building 4111 14.00 14.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $25,000 Building 4111 - 25,001'to 50,000 391:25_ 391.25 ` for first $25,000 -plus Building 4111 10 :10 10.10 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $50,000 Building 4111 50,001 to 100,000 643.75 643.75 ' for first $50,000 plus Building 4111 T.00 7.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to -and including $100,000 Building 4.111 100,001 to 50.0,000 993.75 993.75 ` for first $100,000 plus Building 4111 5.60 5.60 for each additional $1,000 or,fraction thereof to and including $500,000 Building 4111 500;001 to 1,000,000 3,233.75 3;233.75 ' for the first $500,000 plus Building 4111 4.75 4.75 for each additional $1,000 or-fraction thereof to and including Building 4111 $1,000,000 1,000,001 and up 5,608.75 5,608.75 ' for the first $1,000,000 plus Building 4111 3.65 3.65 for each additional - $1,000 or fraction thereof Building 4111 plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 16B,70 Building 4380 H: \BUDGET\2011 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 12/15/2010 3 :33 PM City of Edina Proposed SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE 2010 2011 General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A AMOUNT DEPT REV H:1BUD� _011 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 12/15/20 3 PM Plan Review 65% 65% of Permit Fee Building 4111 410 410.02 Subd. 2 Other Permit Related Fees 55.00 55.00 per hour or the total hourly cost to City, whichever Building 4111 is greatest. (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) 410 410.02 Subd. 3 Residential Building Contractor, 5.00 5.00 surcharge pursuant to M.S. 326.86 Building 4380 Remodeler or Specialty Contractor License Verification 415 415.02 Permit for Moving of Building 212.00 212.00 Building 4111 415 415.02 Subd. 3 Indemnity Deposit for Damages 530.00 530.00 unless licensed by Commissioner of Transportation Building 2605 Sustained by Moving of Building 421 421.03 R -O -W Work Annual Registration 200.00 200.00 Engineer 4341 421 421.04 R -O -W Excavation Permit Administrative 75.00 75.00 Engineer 4341 Fee Per Additional Excavation -Paved Area 35.00 35.00 Engineer 4341 Per Additional Excavation- Unpaved Area 20.00 20.00 Engineer 4341 Underground Utility/Telecom Installation 45.00 45.00 per 100 L. Ft. Engineer 4341 - Directional Boring or Tunneling (Plus Minimum Permit Fee) Underground Utility/Telecom Installation 60.00 60.00 per 100 L. Ft. Engineer 4341 - Open Trenching (Plus Minimum Permit Fee) Overhead Utility/Telecom Installation 5.00 5.00 per 100 L. Ft. Engineer 4341 (Plus Minimum Permit Fee) 421 421.07 Subd. 3 Street Surface Repair 50.00 50.00 Per square foot under 10 square feet Engineer 4343 40.00 40.00 Per square foot from 10 -25 square feet Engineer 4343 35.00 35.00 Per square foot over 25 square feet Engineer 4343 430 430.03 Subd. 8 Installer's Licenses: Oil Burner; Stoker; 55.00 55.00 Building 4117 Steam or Hot Water Heating, Mechanical Warm Air Heating and Air Conditioning; Refrigeration, and Gas Piping Installers 435 435.07 Gas Piping Permit; Oil Burner, Stoker, Minimum Fee: Steam or Hot Water Heating, Mechanical 22.00 22.00 Residential - plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 166.70 Building 4115 Warm Air Heating and Air Conditioning; 27.00 27.00 Commercial - plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 166.70 Building 4115 or Refrigeration Permit Fee Calculations: $0 to 1,000 16.00 16.00 ' plus 3.10 % >$ 500 Building 4115 1,001 to 5,000 31.50 31.50 ' plus 2.60 %> $ 1,000 Building 4115 5,001 to 10,000 135.50 135.50 ' plus 2.15% > $ 5,000 Building 4115 10,001 to 25,000 243.00 243.00 ` plus 1.85% > $10,000 Building 4115 25,001 to 50,000 520.50 520.50 "plus 1.65 %> $25,000 Building 4115 50,001 and over 933.00 933.00 ' plus 1.30% > $50,000 Building 4115 ' plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 1613.70 435 435.07 Subd. 1 Other Permit Related Fees 55.00 55.00 per hour or the total hourly cost to City, whichever is Building 4115 greatest (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved 440 440.04 Plumbing or Water Conditioning Permit Minimum Fee: 15.00 15.00 Residential - plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 1613.70 Building 4112 27.00 27.00 Commercial - plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 16B.70 Fee Calculations: $0 to 300 15.00 15.00 Building 4112 H:1BUD� _011 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 12/15/20 3 PM City of Edina SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE Propm. 2010 2011 General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A AMOUNT DEPT REV H: \BUDGET\2011 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 12/15/2010 3:33 PM $301 to 700 15.00 15.00 * plus 1.75% >$300 Building 4112 $701 to 1,000 22.00 22.00 * plus 3.10 % >$700 Building 4112 " 1,001 to 5,000 31.50 31.50 * plus 2.60 %> $1,000 Building 4112 5,001 to 10,000 135.50 135.50 * plus 2.15 %> $5,000 Building 4112 10,001 to 25,000 243.00 243.00 * plus 1.85% > $10,000 Building 4112 25,001 to 50,000 520.50 520.50 * plus 1.65% > $25,000 Building 4112 50,001 and over 933.00 933.00 * plus 1.30% > $50,000 Building 4112 * plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 16B.70 440 440.04 Installation or Testing of RPZ Backflow 27.00 27.00 Building 4306 Preventers 440 440.04 Subd. 1. Other Permit Related Fees 55.00 55.00 per hour or the total hourly cost to City, whichever Building 4306 is greatest. (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved.) 445 445.08 Surcharge for Prohibited Connection to 100.00 100.00 per month Building 4391 Sanitary Sewer 450 450.05 Swimming Pool Construction Same as the fees for a building permit (See 410.02 Subd.1, fees) Building 4111 450 450.27 Subd. 4 Public or Semi - Public Swimming Pool 470.00 470.00 per year for each enclosed pool (partial or all of the year) Health 4173 License 310.00 320.00 per year for each outdoor pool Health 4173 450 450.27 Subd. 4 Public or Semi - Public Whirlpool Bath or 170.00 170.00 per year for each bath or pool Health 4173 Therapeutic Swimming Pool License 460 460.06 Subd. 1 Sign Permit 150.00 150.00 for reface or 50 square feet or less, plus an additional Planning 4185 3.00 3.00 per square foot for signs greater than 50 square feet. 460 460.06 Subd. 1 Courtesy Bench Sign Permit 35.00 35.00 per year Planning 4185 460 460.06 Subd 6 Sign Variance Fee 350.00 350.00 Residential Property Planning 4361 700.00 700.00 Commercial Property Planning 4361 475 475.03 Subd. 1 Parking Ramp License 125.00 125.00 per year Building 4134 605 605.05 Subd. 1 Operational permits required by MSFC 55.00 55.00 Per hour with a minimum 1 hour fee. (Includes supervision, code review, Fire 4322 Section 105.6 inspections, overhead, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) Non - business hours inspection 80.00 80.00 Per hour with a minimum 1 hour fee. Fire 4325 605 605.05 Subd. 1 Construction permits required by MSFC Section 105.7 except for those covered in City Code Section 625 If total valuation of work is: Then amount is: $1 to 500 27.00 27.00 *minimum fee Fire 4324 501 to 2,000 27.00 27.00 * for first $500 plus Fire 4324 4.00 4.00 for each additional $100 or fraction thereof to and including $2,000 2,001 to 25,000 80.00 80.00 * for first $2,000 plus Fire 4324 16.00 16.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $25,000 25,001 to 50,000 450.00 450.00 * for first $25,000 plus Fire 4324 12.00 12.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $50,000 50,001 to 100,000 740.00 740.00 * for first $50,000 plus Fire 4324 9.00 9.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000 100,001 to 500,000 1,140.00 1,140.00 * for first $100,000 plus Fire 4324 7.00 7.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $500,000 500,001 to 1,000,000 3,720.00 3,720.00 * for first $500,000 plus Fire 4324 6.00 6.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $1,000,000 1,000,001 and up 6,450.00 6,450.00 * for first $1,000,000 plus Fire 4324 H: \BUDGET\2011 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 12/15/2010 3:33 PM City of Edina SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE Proposed 2010 2011 General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A AMOUNT DEPT REV H: \BUG 011 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 12/15/20 3 PM 5.00 5.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof Plan check 70% 70% of permit fee 605 605.05 Subd. 2 Code Compliance Inspection 55.00 55.00 Per hour with a minimum 1 hour fee. (Includes supervision, code review, Fire 4326 inspections, overhead, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) 615 615.03 License to Service Fire Extinguishers 100.00 100.00 per year per person licensed Fire. 4325 620 620.04 Permit Fee for Cleaning Commercial 85.00 85.00 Fire 4321 Kitchen Exhaust Hood and Duct Systems 625 625.04 Subd. 1 Sprinkler Permit Fees: Per Number of Heads: 1- 5 50.00 50.00 * (minimum fee) Fire 4161 6- 12 75.00 85.00 * Fire 4161 13- 25 130.00 135.00 * Fire 4161 26- 50 240.00 250.00 * Fire 4161 51 - 75 320.00 330.00 * Fire 4161 76-100 380.00 390.00 * Fire 4161 101-125 420.00 430.00 * Fire 4161 126-150 450.00 460.00 .* Fire 4161 151-175 490.00 500.00 * Fire 4161 176-200 520.00 530.00 * Fire 4161 201 plus 600.00 610.00 " for first 200 + $3.00 for each additional head Fire 4161 625 625.04 Subd. 1 Fire Pump Installation and Associated 250.00 250.00 Fire 4161 Hardware Dry Valve Assembly 250.00 250.00 Fire 4161 Hydrant Flow Test 100.00 100.00 Fire 4161 Standpipe Installation 150.00 150.00 Fire 4161 Each Additional Standpipe 50.00 50.00 Fire 4161 625 625.04 Subd. 1 Fire alarm & alternative fire suppression permit If total valuation of work is: Then amount is: $1 to 500 27.00 30.00 *minimum fee Fire 4162 501 to 2,000 27.00 30.00 * for first $500 plus Fire 4162 4.00 4.00 for each additional $100 or fraction thereof to and including $2,000 2,001 to 25,000 80.00 80.00 * for first $2,000 plus Fire 4162 16.00 16.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $25,000 25,001 to 50,000 450.00 450.00 * for first $25,000 plus Fire 4162 12.00 12.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $50,000 50,001 to 100,000 740.00 740.00 * for first $50,000 plus Fire 4162 8.00 8.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000 100,001 to 500,000 1,140.00 1,140.00 * for first $100,000 plus Fire 4162 7.00 7.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $500,000 500,001 to 1,000,000 3,720.00 3,720.00 * for first $500,000 plus Fire 4162 6.00 6.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $1,000,000 1,000,001 and up 6,450.00 6,450.00 * for first $1,000,000 plus Fire 4162 5.00 5.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof Plan check 70% 70% of permit fee 625 625.04 Subd. 2 Other Permit Related Fees 55.00 55.00 Per hour with a minimum 1 hour fee. (Includes supervision, code review, Fire 4325 inspections, overhead, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) 635 635.02 False Fire Alarm 300.00 300.00 Residential Fire 4323 500.00 500.00 Commercial Fire 4323 H: \BUG 011 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 12/15/20 3 PM City of Edina SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE Propo, 2010 2011 General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A AMOUNT DEPT REV 640 640.02 License allowing sale of Fireworks 100.00 100.00 Per year Fire 4137 716 716.02 Recycling Service: 7.50 7.50 Per Quarter - Single Family Recycle 4640 7.50 7.50 Per Quarter - Double Bungalow Recycle 4640 7.50 7.50 Per Quarter - Apartments /Condos (2 -8 units) Recycle 4640 721 721.03 Subd. 1 Food Establishment 610.00 610.00 High risk food Health 4171 380.00 380.00 Medium risk food Health 4171 110.00 110.00 Low risk food Health 4171 140.00 145.00 Base fee Health 4171 55.00 55.00 Beer or wine table service Health 4171 130.00 130.00 Alcohol bar service Health 4171 138.00 138.00 Food vehicle Health 4171 150.00 150.00 Additional facility Health 4171 200.00 200.00 Pushcart Health 4171 120.00 120.00 Itinerant food Health 4171 15.00 15.00 Food vending machine Health 4172 721 721.03 Subd 1 Restaurant Plan Review Fee 150% of License Fee Health 4353 Restaurant Plan Review Fee for Remodel 100% of License Fee Minimum Restaurant Plan Review Fee 125.00 125.00 Health 4353 735 735.03 Lodging Establishment 8.00 8.00 per room Health 4177 Supervised Group Home 45.00 45.00 Health 4177 Boarding and Lodging House License 105.00 105.00 Health 4177 740 740.04 Multiple Dwelling Parking Garage 48.00 48.00 per single tract of land (may contain more than one building under Health 4179 same ownership) 740 740.04 Multiple Dwelling Parking Garage 85.00 85.00 per garage Health 4351 Inspection Fee 745 745.04 Subd. 2 Body Art Establishment License 270.00 300.00 Health 4137 745.07 Subd. 1 Body Art Establishment Plan Review Fee 300.00 810 810.09 Subd. 3C Neighborhood Property Owner List 1.00 1.00 per property owner name Planning 4361 810 810.09 Plat and Subdivision Filing Fee 200.00 200.00 per lot for division of one or more lots where no new buildable Planning 4361 lots are created 700.00 700.00 plus $50 /lot - all plats and subdivision other than above Planning 4361 810 810.09 Subd. 2 Developer's Agreement Fee for City 6.5% of the total construction cost of such public improvements Planning 4361 Services Rendered in Connection with Required Street, Water and Sewer Improvements 815 815.03 Antennas, Dish Antennas & Tower Same as for a building permit (See Subsection 410.02 Subd 1 fees) Building 4111 Permits 820 820.01 Filing of Application for Vacation of 445.00 450.00 Clerk 4391 Street, Alley or Easement 830 830.05 Subd. 2 Permit Fee for Tree Removal or Grading Building 4118 If total valuation of work is: Then amount is: $1 to $5,000 150.00 150.00 $5,001 to $100,000 150.00 150.00 for first $5,000 plus 2.00 2.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000 $100,001 and up 340.00 340.00 for first $100,000 plus 1.00 1.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof 830 830.05 Subd. 2 Permit Fee for Open Pit or Excavation Building 4118 If total valuation of work is: Then amount is: H: \BUDGET\2011 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 12/15/2010 3:33 PM City of Edina SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE Proposed 2010 2011 General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A AMOUNT DEPT REV H: \BUD 2011 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 12/15/20 3 PM $1 to $5,000 150.00 150.00 $5,001 to $100,000 150.00 150.00 for first $5,000 plus 2.00 2.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000 $100,001 and up 340.00 340.00 for first $100,000 plus 1.00 1.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof 830 830.05 Subd. 2 Other Permit Related Fees 55.00 55.00 per hour or the total hourly cost to City, whichever Building 4111 is greatest. (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved.) 845 845.04 Restricted Access Parking Lot License 500.00 500.00 Planning 4137 Renewals: 100.00 100.00 0 - 50 spaces Planning 4137 150.00 150.00 51 -100 spaces Planning 4137 250.00 250.00 100 - 200 spaces Planning 4137 400.00 400.00 Over 200 spaces Planning 4137 850 850.04 Subd. 1C Variance Fee 350.00 350.00 Residential Planning 4361 600.00 600.00 Commercial Planning 4361 850 850.04 Subd. 2A.2 Fee for Transfer of Land to Another 500.00 500.00 (One) R -2 Lot Planning 4361 Zoning District 600.00 600.00 (Two) R -2 Lots Planning 4361 1,100.00 1,100.00 All other Transfers Planning 4361 850 850.04 Subd. 2 -5 Mailed Notices 1.00 1.00 A parcel Planning 850 850.173 Subd. 4C.1a Temporary Retail Sales in PID Permit 400.00 400.00 First Permit Planning 4361 300.00 300.00 Subsequent Permits Planning 4361 850 850.04 Subd. 4 A.2 Conditional Use Permit 800.00 800.00 Fee shall be equal to City staff time expended and City's direct Planning 4361 cost incurred in processing applications. 850 850.10 Subd. 1D Landscaping Inspection 100.00 100.00 Planning 4361 850 850.04 Subd. 6 Final Development Plan Application Fee 850.00 850.00 Planning 4361 850 850.20 Subd. 10 Certificate of Appropriateness Planning 4361 600.00 600.00 Accessory structure and facade change 1,200.00 1,200.00 New house 900 900.07 Subd. 1 Liquor License Fees (per year) Police 4130 300.00 300.00 Under 200 members 500.00 500.00 201 -500 members 650.00 650.00 501 -1000 members 850.00 850.00 1001 -2000 members 1,000.00 1,000.00 2001 -4000 members 2,000.00 2,000.00 4001 -6000 members 3,000.00 3,000.00 over 6000 members 8,755.00 8,755.00 On -Sale Intoxicating License - Restaurants only Police 4132 645.00 655.00 3.2 Beer License Off or On Sale Police 4130 2,000.00 2,000.00 Wine On -Sale - Restaurants only Police 4131 200.00 200.00 per event - Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating - Max 3 days by MS Police 4130 87.00 90.00 per event - Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor Police 4130 200.00 200.00 Sunday On -Sale License - Restaurants only Police 4130 1020 1020 False Automatic Alarm 25.00 25.00 for the first response per calendar year Police 4332 110.00 110.00 for the 2nd thru 4th response within one calendar year Police 4332 200.00 200.00 for the 5th and subsequent false alarm within one calendar year Police 4332 1040 1040.08 Loudspeaker Permit 21.00 22.00 Clerk 4137 1045 1045.05 Variance Fee RV's, Boats, etc. Storage 50.00 50.00 Planning 436 1100 1100.03 Subd. 2 Sewer Service Charge: Based upon water usage during winter quarter. (November 1 to March 1) H: \BUD 2011 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 12/15/20 3 PM City of Edina SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE Propm 2010 2011 General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A AMOUNT DEPT REV H: \BUDGET\2011 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 12/15/2010 3:33 PM Single Family Dwellings, Townhouses, Two - Family Dwellings, Apartment Buildings Containing Four or Less 44.96 47.36 Per quarter up to and including 1600 cubic feet Finance 4641 Dwelling Units: 2.81 2.96 Additional from 1601 cubic feet and over Finance 4641 Apartment Buildings with More Than 40.46 42.62 Per quarter for each unit over four or Finance 4641 Four Dwelling Units: 2.81 2.96 per 100 cubic feet of water used during the quarter, whichever is greater Finance 4641 Commercial and Industrial Buildings, 44.96 47.36 Per water meter or approved sewage metering device on premises, or Finance 4641 Including Schools and Churches: 2.81 2.96 per 100 cubic feet of water used during the quarter, whichever is greater Finance 4641 1100 1100.03 Subd. 3 Industrial User Extra Strength Charges As allocated to City by Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Finance 4641 1100 1100.03 Subd. 4.A Shutting Off or Turning On Curb Water For each turn -on and each shut -off. Finance 4628 Stops at Customer's Request or Due to Non - payment of Bill 35.00 35.00 1100 1100.04 Subd. 1.0 Issuance of Water Meter Cost of water meter, plus handling charges Finance 4627 1100 1100.03 Subd. 2 Water Service 1. Per 100 cubic feet for areas of City, except as described in #2 below Finance 4626 1.11 1.17 Up to 3500 cubic feet 1.47 1.55 From 3600 cubic feet to 6500 cubic feet 2.30 2.43 Over 6500 cubic feet 2.23 2.34 2. Per 100 cubic feet - Morningside area Finance 4626 Domestic accounts used by: Commercial and Industrial Buildings, 1.11 1.17 Up to 3500 cubic feet Including Schools and Churches: 1.47 1.55 Over 3500 cubic feet Lawn watering accounts used by: Commercial and Industrial Buildings, 1.47 1.55 Up to 3500 cubic feet Including Schools and Churches: 2.30 2.43 Over 3500 cubic feet Meter Charge: 13.48 14.22 Per quarter for up to 3/4 inch meter Finance 4627 18.36 19.38 Per quarter for 1 inch meter Finance 4627 20.95 22.10 Per quarter for 1 1/4 inch meter Finance 4627 23.56 24.87 Per quarter for 1 1/2 inch meter Finance 4627 37.95 40.04 Per quarter for 2 inch meter Finance 4627 144.13 152.06 Per quarter for 3 inch meter Finance 4627 183.46 193.55 Per quarter for 4 inch meter Finance 4627 Flat Annual Charges as Follows: - - Park Department for water used for sprinkling and skating rinks Finance 4626 - - Street Department for water used for flushing street Finance 4626 1105 1105.01 Subd. 1 Service Availability Charge (SAC) 2,100.00 2,230.00 Per SAC unit X number of SAC units computed pursuant to Subsection Building 4307 1105.01, Subd, 1 of this code 1105 1105.02 Charge for Connection to City Water or 800.00 800.00 Water connection charge per REC unit X number of SAC units Building 4116 Sewer System 400.00 400.00 Sewer connection charge per REC unit X number of SAC units 1110 1110.03 Storm Water Drainage Charge 18.13 19.58 Per quarter pursuant to formula in Subsection 1110.03 Finance 4642 1115 1115.03 Water Surcharges Surcharges for violation of the Irrigation Bans are determined based on the number of water restriction violations issued to an owner in the previous three years and are as follows: First Offense Written warning Second Offense 50.00 50.00 Third Offense 100.00 100.00 Fourth Offense 200.00 200.00 Each Additional Offense 300.00 300.00 1205 1205.01 Curb Cut Permit 40.00 40.00 Engineer 4344 1230 1230.07 Sidewalk Caf6 Permit 640.00 650.00 Clerk Clerk 4137 4137 1230.08 Temporary Liquor License Special Permit 315.00 320.00 Per event 1235 1235.03 Subd. 2 Parking Permit 4.00 5.00 per month pro -rated Police Police 4751 4751 Refund Parking Permit - Sticker Must 4.00 5.00 per month pro -rated H: \BUDGET\2011 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 12/15/2010 3:33 PM City of Edina SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE Proposed 2010 2011 General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A AMOUNT DEPT REV 1300 1300.02 Subd. 1 Be Returned Refuse or Recycling Hauler's License 300.00 95.00 300.00 95.00 per year for 1 st vehicle per year for each additional vehicle Health Health 4178 4178 1311 1311.03 Peddler /Solicitor Permit 30.00 30.00 per permit - valid for 14 calendar days Police 4128 1311.04 Subd. 1 Registration for Peddling /Soliciting 50.00 50.00 per registration - valid for 90 calendar days Police 4128 1325 1325.03 Tobacco Sale License 365.00 365.00 per location Health 4170 1341 1341.02 Registration for Massage Therapists 17.00 18.00 Per therapist for those businesses exempt from licensure Clerk 4137 1341 1341.05 Physical Culture & Health Service or 285.00 290.00 Business License Clerk 4137 Club, Reducing Club or Salon, Sauna Parlor, Massage Parlor or Escort Service 1341 1341.05 License Investigation Fee - Business License 1,500.00 1,500.00 Clerk 4314 1345 1345.05 Subd. 1 Sexually- oriented Business License 5,000.00 5,000.00 per year Clerk Clerk 4137 4137 1345 1345.05 Subd. 2 Business License 1,500.00 1,500.00 At time of original application Clerk 4133 1350 1350.06 Subd. 1 Commercial Photography 32.00 33.00 Manager Permit - Still Photography Clerk 4133 125.00 128.00 Manager Permit - Motion Photography 355.00 360.00 Council Permit Clerk 4133 1400 1400.12 Truck Restrictive Road Permit 100.00 100.00 Engineer 4190 1410 1410.01 Redemption of Impounded Vehicle Fee as posted in Police Department Police 4334 H: \BUG 2011 Proposed Fees & Charges.xlsx 12/15/2C 33 PM C17Y OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 20 FUND: GENERAL REVENUE SUMMARY REVENUES SUMMARY 2008 2009 2010 2011 -ESTIMATED BUDGETED DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL PROPOSED TAXES: PROPERTY TAXES PENALTIES AND INTEREST $18,683,180 $19,712,348 15,476 20,180 $20,737,472 12,000 $20,737,472 12,000 $21,004,000 12,000 LOSS DUE TO ABATEMENTS - - 340,000 634,124 327,000) 18,698,656 19,732,528 20,409,472 20,115,348 20,689,000 TOTAL TAXES LICENSE AND PERMITS: HEAT/VENT LICENSE BUILDING PERMITS PLUMBING PERMITS HEATING PERMITS MECHANICAL PERMITS 35,379 26,235 1,873,338 1,217,654 145,760 124,114 - 23,360 379,474 264,097 30,000 1,400,000 135,000 18,000 275,000 -30,000 1,380,000 130,000 - 250,000 30,000 1,421,990 130,000 10,000 270,000 GRADING /EXCAVATION PERMITS " 2,826 5,192 2,500 2,000 2,500 DOG LICENSES BEER LICENSE WINE LICENSE LIQUOR LICENSE PARKING RAMP OTHER PERMITS & LICENSES 32,528 40,535 10,336 10,642 22,000 15,075 144,283 145,083 3,375 3,375 7,363 7,386 50,000 12,360 20,000 150,000 3,300 3,000 27,500 12,360 27,800 135,000 3,300 3,000 35,000 12,000 25,000 142,000 3,300 3,000 SPRINKLER PERMITS ALARM PERMITS TOBACCO LICENSE FOOD ESTABLISHMENT LICENSE 34,261 23,017 25,566 11,509 10,945 5,600 92,862 96,472 30,000 14,500 8,000 100,000 30,000 14,500 10,250 93,000 30,000 14,500 10,000 95,000 FOOD VENDING LICENSE 1,110 1,125 2,000 2,000 1,500 POOL LICENSE 22,050 26,052 23,500 23,500 24,000 AMUSEMENT DEVICE LICENSE 1,620 1,695 1,500 2,000 1,500 LODGING LICENSE GARBAGE COLLECTORS LICENSE 1,575 931 14,485 11,435 1,000 13,000 1,000 13,000 1,000 13,000 PARKING GARAGE LICENSE 3,240 4,005 3,200 3,200 3,200 SIGN PERMIT ROAD RESTRICTION PERMITS 9,605 11,730 11,800 4,820 15,000 10,000 9,500 28,850 11,000 20,000 2,885,781 2,081,139 2,320,860 2,231,760 2,309,490 TOTAL LICENSES AND PERMITS INTERGOVERNMENTAL AID: FEDERAL AID STATE AID MAINTENANCE 18,937 104,906 195,000 195,000 36,000 195,000 36,000 195,000 36,000 195,000 OTHER STATE AID STATE POLICE AID STATE HEALTH AID TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENT AID 148,321 126,973 342,661 338,684 120,130 119,086 100,000 355,000 120,000 51,000 355,000 120,000 51,000 355,000 120,000 825,049 8841,649 806,000 757,000 757,000 CITY OF EDINA ANNUAL BUDGET PAGE - 21 FUND: GENERAL I REVENUE SUMMARY REVENUES SUMMARY 2008 2009 2010 2011 DESCRIPTION ACTUAL ACTUAL ESTIMATED BUDGETED PROPOSED FEES AND CHARGES: BUILDING DEPARTMENT $ 8,761 $ 29,132 $ 30,000 $ 5,400 $ 25,000 CITY CLERK 110,936 8,862 100,000 6,000 6,000 FIRE DEPARTMENT 21,975 31,237 30,000 30,000 30,000 AMBULANCE 1,522,637 1,556,146 1,545,000 1,545,000 1,545,000 POLICE DEPARTMENT 344,171 172,878 175,000 201,000 200,000 ENGINEERING 274,965 210,071 170,000 170,000 180,000 HEALTH DEPARTMENT 7,080 6,580 9,000 7,700 7,700 PLANNING DEPARTMENT 43,290 16,536 27,500 27,500 27,500 HOUSING FOUNDATION CONTRACT 30,533 37,870 25,000 25,000 26,000 SERVICES HRA PARK REGISTRATION FEES 32,122 98,026 28,377 103,530 21,500 100,000 21,500 22,000 96,000 98,000 SENIOR CENTER FEES 99,259 94,525 95,000 100,000 98,000 OTHER FEES 2,998 1,540 5,000 5,000 4,000 50TH & FRANCE ASSESSMENT 69,000 69,000 69,000 69,000 69,000 CHARGES TO OTHER FUNDS 374,088 392,880 393,168 393,168 395,604 3,039,841 2,759,164 2,795,168 2,702,268 2,733,804 TOTAL FEES AND CHARGES FINES AND FORFEITURES: MUNICIPAL COURT FINES 968,893 1,148,440 1,100,000 950,000 975,000 OTHER REVENUES: INCOME ON INVESTMENTS 260,249 37,668 109,382 109,382 115,919 RENTAL OF PROPERTY 129,302 191,136 195,000 195,000 200,000 PARK RENTAL 125,135 151,310 120,000 120,000 125,000 DONATIONS MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 13,171 5,562 28,367 15,039 11,000 6,000 11,000 12,000 6,000 6,000 533,419 423,520 441,382 441,382 458,919 TOTAL OTHER REVENUES TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE $26,951,639 $27,029,440 $27,872,882 $27,197,758 $27,923,213 OTHER FINANCING SOURCES: TRANSFER FROM LIQUOR 742,800 765,100 765,100 765,100 765,100 742,800 765,100 765,100 765,100 765,100 TOTAL OTHER FINANCING TOTAL GENERAL FUND REVENUE AND OTHER FINANCING SOURCES $27,694,439 $27,794,540 $28,637,982 $27,962,858 $28,688,313 ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -20 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. The following described fees of Schedule A to Code Section 185 are amended to read ac fnllnwc- SEC- SUBSEC. PURPOSE OF AMOUNT TION FEE /CHARGE 225 Special Events Application 1225.04 Fee $60.00 450 450.27 Subd. 4 Public or Semi - Public 1 Swimming Pool License $320.00 per year for each outdoor pool 625 625.04 Subd. 1 Sprinkler Permit Fees Per Number of Heads: 6 to 12 $85.00 13-25 $135.00 26-50 $250.00 51 -75 $330.00 76-100 $390.00 101-125 $430.00 126-150 $460.00 151-175 $500.00 176-200 $530.00 201 plus $610.00 For first 200 + $3.00 for each additional head 625 625.04 Subd. 1 Fire alarm & alternative fire Then amount is: suppression permit. If total valuation of work is: $1 to 500 $30.00 * minimum fee 501 to 2,000 $30.00 * for first $500 721 721.03 Subd 1 Food Establishment $145.00 Base fee 745 745.04 Subd. 2 Body Art Establishment License $300.00 Body Art Establishment Plan Review Fee $300.00 820 820.01 Filing of Application for Vacation of Street, Alley or Easement $450.00 900 900.07 Subd. 1 Liquor License Fees (per $655.00 3.2 Beer License Off or On Sale year) $90.00 Per event - Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor 1040 1040.08 Loudspeaker Permit $22.00 1100 1100.03 Sub. 2 Sewer Service: 1. Single Family Dwellings, $47.36 Per quarter up to and including Townhouses, Two - Family 1600 cubic feet Dwellings, Apartment $2.96 Additional from 1601 cubic feet & buildings with four or less over dwelling units 2. Apartment Buildings with $42.62 Per quarter for each unit over four More Than Four Dwelling $2.96 or per 100 cubic feet of water used Units. during the quarter, Whichever is greater 3. Commercial and $47.36 Per water meter or approved Industrial Buildings, Sewage metering device on including Schools and premises, or Churches $2.96 Per 100 cubic feet of water used During the quarter, whichever is greater 1100 1100.03 Sub. 2 Water Service: 1. Per 100 cubic feet for $1.17 up to 3500 c.f. areas of City, except areas $1.55 3600 to 6500 c.f. described in #4 below: $2.43 over 6500 c.f. 2. Domestic accounts used by commercial and $1.17 Up to 3500 cubic feet industrial buildings, $1.55 Over 3500 cubic feet including schools and churches. 3. Lawn watering accounts used by commercial and $1.55 Up to 3500 cubic feet industrial buildings, $2.43 Over 3500 cubic feet including schools and churches. 4. For Morningside area. $2.34 per 100 c.f. 5. Meter charge $14.22 per quarter for up to % inch meter $19.38 per quarter for 1 inch meter $22.10 per quarter for 1 '/4 inch meter $24.87 per quarter for 1 '/z inch meter $40.04 per quarter for 2 inch meter $152.06 per quarter for 3 inch meter $193.55 per quarter for 4 inch meter 1105 1105.01 Subd. Service Availability Charge $2,230.00Per SAC unit x number of SAC 1 (SAC) units computed pursuant to Subsection 1105.01 subd. 1 of this code 1110 1110.03 Storm Water Drainage $19.58 per quarter pursuant to formula in Charge Subsection 1110.03 1230 1230.07 Sidewalk Cafe Permit $650.00 1230.08 Temporary Liquor License Special Permit $320.00 Per event 1235 1235.03 Subd Parking Permit $5.00 Per month pro -rated 1 2 Refund Parking Permit $5.00 Per month pro-rated 1341 1341.02 Registration for Massage $18.00 Per therapist for those businesses Therapists exempt from licensure 1341 1341.05 Physical Culture & Health $290.00 Business License Service or Club, Reducing Club or Salon, Sauna Parlor, Massage Parlor or Escort Service License 1350 1350.06 Subd. Commercial Photography $33.00 Manager Permit — Still 1 Photography $128.00 Manager Permit — Motion Photography $360.00 Council Permit Section 2. First Reading: The effective date, of this Ordinance shall be January 1, 2011. December 7, 2010 Second Reading: Published: Attest: Debra Mangen -City Clerk James B. Hovland -Mayor o Le g T REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.F. From: Cary Teague Planning Director ® Action ❑ Discussion Information Date: December 21, 2010 Subject: Second Reading: Ordinance No. 2010 -17 - Regarding Non - Conforming Buildings And Uses And Additions To Or Replacement Of Homes With A First Floor Elevation Over One Foot Above The Existing Homes First Floor Elevation ACTION REQUESTED: Approve second reading of Ordinance 2010 -17, subject to any revisions required by the City Council. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached is Ordinance 2010 -17, which has been revised to include recommendations by the City Council at the November 16, 2010 meeting. (New text is in blue.) Input was also obtained from the city engineer, and Bob Obermeyer of Barr Engineering and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Mr. Obermeyer believes that the cost for a determination of ground water issues should be in the range of $1,000 to $1,500. Mr. Obermeyer will be in attendance at the December 21St meeting to provide expertise, and answer questions. ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance 2010 -17 Planning Commission staff report. Minutes E' U3 rJ � �y PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague September 29, 2010 2009.0004.10 Director of Planning (Zoning Ordinance Amendments) INFORMATION /BACKGROUND Before the Planning Commission are three Zoning Ordinance Amendments that have been studied by the Commission over the past year as part of the Zoning Ordinance Update. The three amendments are as follows: 1. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Zoning District; 2. Non - Conforming Use /Alternative Setback Standard Ordinance; and 3. Driveway Width. In addition to the attached background information on each of the three topics; the following provides some additional information and summary of each ordinance. Planned Unit Development (PUD) The attached ordinance proposing a PUD is the result of numerous meetings and discussions held by the Planning Commission. (See attached information and minutes from previous meetings and work sessions.) The Commission is now asked to consider how the ordinance would fit into the overall Zoning Ordinance. The attached ordinance amendment is for Section 850.04, which is the entire Section of the ordinance regarding administration and procedures for variances and appeals, rezoning, transfer to planned districts (final development plans) and conditional use permits. The major change to the section of the code would be the creation of a PUD zoning district. As previously discussed, there are two primary benefits to a PUD: 5. Amends submittal requirements. 6. Establishes the PUD District as previously recommended. 7. Suggests new CUP standards as recommended by the City Attorney. 8. Eliminates temporary CUP's which are not legal. Non - Conforming Use /Alternative Setback Standard Ordinance A recent Minnesota Supreme Court ruling has rejected a 20 year old ruling regarding the meaning of -"undue hardship" in regard to review of variances. In light of this ruling, many Cities, including Edina, are considering the attached Ordinance Amendment to allow expansion of non - conforming structures to match existing non - conforming setbacks, rather than grant variances, which has typically been the standard in Edina before this ruling. The previous ruling of "undue hardship" meant that cities could determine if the ordinance prevented a "reasonable use "of property. Cities had some discretion to determine if a use requiring a variance was reasonable. The new ruling holds that a variance cannot be approved unless the ordinance prevents all reasonable use of the property. Therefore, if a homeowner wanted to build an addition to their home that did not meet all ordinance requirements, a variance would not be possible, as he /she would already have reasonable use of the property, a single - family home. This is a major change in the criteria for granting a variance. Edina's Variance History In drafting the ordinance, staff researched variances that have been granted in the past. See attached reports dated September 1 and 29, regarding recent variance history. The September 1, 2010 report points out that over the past three plus years, 154 single - family home residential variance requests were made. Nearly half of those were for expansions to homes that had non- conforming setbacks. Expansions to these structures to match the existing non- conforming setback are typically approved. The September 29, 2010 report was requested by the Planning Commission at the „ open house „ on September 15. It examines the size of structures within non- conforming setbacks. The results of the report are the basis for the 200 square foot maximum encroachment suggested. 3 considered, in driveway width; should there be an impervious surface requirement; what is the definition of a driveway; and would a maximum width requirement create non - conforming driveways? Currently, there is no maximum driveway width requirement for residential driveways in the City of Edina. Staff is not aware of any complaints or issues in the past regarding this regulation. Staff is concerned about establishing a requirement that would create non - conforming uses, and create a demand for variances. If a maximum width requirement is desired, the issues raised could be further studied as part of other amendments currently being worked on, including impervious surface and lot coverage requirements. In summary the proposed ordinance would: 1. Eliminate the minimum driveway width requirement in the R -1 and R -2 Zoning Districts. 2. Allows pervious pavers as an acceptable driveway material. Recommendation /Conclusion Staff recommends approval of the attached ordinances subject to any additions or amendments recommended by the Commission. ORDINANCE 2010 -17 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE CONCERNING NONCONFORMING BUILDINGS AND USES AND ADDITIONS TO OR REPLACEMENT OF HOMES WITH A FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION OVER ONE FOOT ABOVE THE EXISTING HOMES FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Section 850.07 Subd. 20. A. is repealed: 0, Mr.—KNOWN." - ,..:..:._ - - 7 it shall net he FenlaGed with .env ether nt�nnnnfGF inn ,ice• z��vrrCrn- rrv�c- rcp�uvcv�vtr�rarr�vzrr ..,.......,............y ,...,.., GORfORning use theFeafter shall be made of the buolding OF 10t. Section 2. Section 850.07 Subd. 20.6 is amended to read: B. Nonconforming Buildings. 1. Alterations, Additions and Enlargements. a. A nonconforming building, other than a single dwelling unit building, shall not be added to or enlarged, in any manner, or subjected to an alteration involving fifty percent (50 %) or more of the gross floor area of the building, or fifty percent (50 %) or more of the exterior wall area of the building, unless such non - conforming building, including all additions, alterations and enlargements, shall conform to all of the restrictions of the district in which it is located. The percentage of the gross floor area or exterior wall area Existing text — XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX subjected to an alteration shall be the aggregate percentage for any consecutive three (3) year period. h. Alternate setbacks. An addition to a single dwelling unit, building with a nonconforming setback, or an addition to !a structure accessory to a single dwelling unit building With a nonconforming setback, may be constructed, within the existing nonconforming setback, which is the shortest distance from the applicable lot line to the existing structure, subject to the following limitations: J. the addition shall not exceed the existing square footage encroachment into the nonconforming setback or two hundred (200)_ square feet,. whichever is less; and ii. the addition may only be constructed on the same floor as the existing encroachment into the inonconforming-- setback 2. Nonconformities.' Remodeling. NGa- o adeled to n e)dent and in a Fn nner whinh dee-s not violate the r �Tl C,y�q��� GI � OOG TGTIIV� I. !Except as provided, in Section 850.21, any nonconformity, including the lawful use for occupation of land or premises existing at the time of the adoption of an additional control under this Chapter, may be continued, including through repair, replacement, restoration, maintenance, or improvement, but not including expansion, except as specifically - provided in this Chapter, unless:' a. the nonconformity or occupancy is discontinued for a !period of more than one (1) year; or Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX _ ►r-*�- - POP I" h. Alternate setbacks. An addition to a single dwelling unit, building with a nonconforming setback, or an addition to !a structure accessory to a single dwelling unit building With a nonconforming setback, may be constructed, within the existing nonconforming setback, which is the shortest distance from the applicable lot line to the existing structure, subject to the following limitations: J. the addition shall not exceed the existing square footage encroachment into the nonconforming setback or two hundred (200)_ square feet,. whichever is less; and ii. the addition may only be constructed on the same floor as the existing encroachment into the inonconforming-- setback 2. Nonconformities.' Remodeling. NGa- o adeled to n e)dent and in a Fn nner whinh dee-s not violate the r �Tl C,y�q��� GI � OOG TGTIIV� I. !Except as provided, in Section 850.21, any nonconformity, including the lawful use for occupation of land or premises existing at the time of the adoption of an additional control under this Chapter, may be continued, including through repair, replacement, restoration, maintenance, or improvement, but not including expansion, except as specifically - provided in this Chapter, unless:' a. the nonconformity or occupancy is discontinued for a !period of more than one (1) year; or Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX b. any nonconforming use is destroyed by fire or other, peril to the extent of greater than fifty percent (50 %) of its market value, and no building permit has been applied for within one hundred eighty (180) days of when the property is damaged. In these cases, the city of Edina may impose reasonable conditions upon a building permit in order to mitigate any newly created impact on adjacent property. Any subsequent use or, occupancy of the land or premises shall be a conforming use or occupancy: Section 3. Section 850.11 (R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District) Subd. 2. Conditional Uses; is amended to add the following: 1. Additions to or replacement of single dwelling unit buildings with a first floor elevation of more than one (1) foot above the existing first floor elevation of the existing dwelling unit building. Such additions to or replacements of single dwelling unit buildings must meet one' or more of the first three_(3) conditions listed b_ elow, and always meet condition four_(4) 1. The first floor elevation may be increased to the extent necessary to elevate the lowest level of the dwelling to an 'elevation of two (2) feet above the 100 -year flood elevation, as established by the Federal Emergency Management Agency Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX Er Jr QV TJ I - V-7 z 2 r-V M M - - - - - �• - N NCO - - Section 3. Section 850.11 (R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District) Subd. 2. Conditional Uses; is amended to add the following: 1. Additions to or replacement of single dwelling unit buildings with a first floor elevation of more than one (1) foot above the existing first floor elevation of the existing dwelling unit building. Such additions to or replacements of single dwelling unit buildings must meet one' or more of the first three_(3) conditions listed b_ elow, and always meet condition four_(4) 1. The first floor elevation may be increased to the extent necessary to elevate the lowest level of the dwelling to an 'elevation of two (2) feet above the 100 -year flood elevation, as established by the Federal Emergency Management Agency Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX (FEMA), or the City's Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan; or 2. The first floor elevation may be increased to the extent necessary to reasonably protect the dwelling from ground water intrusion. Existing and potential ground water elevations shall be determined in accordance with accepted hydrologic and hydraulic engineering practices. Determinations shall be undertaken by a professional civil engineer licensed under. Minnesota Statutes Chapter 326 or a hydrologist certified by Determinations 'the American Institute of Hydrology. sha_- I"be, ,undertaken by a lerensed design prefessienaf who__S al dOGUMent that e teGhninal methods used refIeGt Gurrently, aGrepted g-ineer+r}grastise. Studies, analyses and computations shall be submitted in sufficient detail to allow ;thorough review and approval_; or 3. The first floor elevation may be increased to the extent (necessary to allow the new building to meet State Building Code, City of Edina Code, or other statutory requirements; and .4. An increase in first floor elevation will only be permitted if the new structure or addition fits the character of the (neighborhood in height, mass and scale,, Section 4. Section 850.11 Subd. 7. H. is hereby amended as follows: H Additions t p of, single f dwellings dwelling unit bud ng sa d building containing two dwelling units. For additions, alterations and changes to, or rebuilds of existing single faMil y d welling dwelling unit buildings and buildings containing two dwellings, the first floor elevation may not be more than one foot above the existing first floor elevation. If a' split level dwelling is torn down and a new home is built, the new first floor or entry level elevation may not be more than one foot above the front entry _ elevation of the home that was torn down. !Subject, 'to Section 850.11 Subd. 2. I. the first floor elevation may be increased more than one (1) foot. The provisions of this paragraph shall apply to all single f--family dwelic .inn 'dwelling unit buildings, and buildings containing two dwelling units including units in the flood plain overlay district. Any deviation from the requirements of this paragraph shall require a variance. Section 5. Section 850.12 (R -2, Double Dwelling Unit District) is amended to add the following: Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX Subd. 3. Conditional Uses! A. Additions to or replacement of single dwelling unit buildings and buildings containing two (2) dwelling units with a first floor elevation' of more than one (1) foot above the existing first floor elevation of the existing dwelling unit building. Such additions to ol� replacements of single or two dwelling unit buildings must meet one', or more of the first three 3 conditions listed below, and- always meet 'condition four (4),ir 1 - The first floor elevation may be increased to the extent !necessary to elevate the lowest level of the dwelling to an elevation of two (2) feet above the 100 -year flood elevation, as established by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), or the City's Comprehensive Water Resources Management_PIan; or 2. The first floor elevation may be increased to the extent- necessary to reasonably protect the dwelling from ground, water intrusion. Existing and potential ground water elevations Shall be determined in accordance with accepted hydrologic' and hydraulic engineering practices. Determinations shall be ;undertaken by a professional civil engineer licensed under` 'Minnesota Statutes Chapter 326 or a hydrologist certified by,, ;the American Institute of Hydrology. Determinations hall . Studies, analyses and computations shall be submitted in sufficient detail to allow, tthorough review and approval; or 3. The first floor elevation may be increased to the extent ;necessary to allow the new building to meet State Building Code, City_ of Edina Code, or other statutory_ requirements; and 4. An increase in first floor elevation will only be permitted if the new structure or addition fits the character of the Lneighborhood in height, mass and scale! Section 6. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text —;XXXX Text added after Council first reading- XXXX First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk Existing text — XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 2010. Nov. 16, 2010 City Council Meeting Minutes No one ap ared to comment. Member Brin made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, to close the public heari Ayes: Bennett, indle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 3 of 9 Member Brindle made motion, seconded by Member Housh, approving a �w on -sale intoxicating liquor license and Sunday on -sa liquor license to Barrio 50th LLC, dba as Cuci Del Barrio, for the period beginning November 16, 2010, and a ing March 31, 2011. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Hou Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Timothy Rooney, 21 N. Fifteenth eet, Apt. 301, Minneapo ' , stated Cucina Del Barrio was a Latin street food concept with large and small plates, ntrees, as well as sp alty drinks. They planned to open mid - December. PUBLIC EDINA — 6820 ST. PATRICK LANE Affid rLIQUOR LICENSE APPROVED — CHURCH OF ST presented and ordered placed on file. Police Chief Long presented the request of hurch of St. Patrick for a temporary intoxicating liquor license for the "Evening for a Brighter Tomorro even December 4, 2010, from 6:00 p.m. to midnight. He stated the request met Code requirements d recomm\eed proval. Mayor Hovland opened the pu c hearing at 8:0 Public Testimony No one appeared to c meet. Member Housh de a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, t close the public hearing. Ayes: Benne , Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion c ed. Mem Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, appro a temporary intoxicating liquor lice a for the Church of St. Patrick's event titled "Evening for a Brighter To rrow" on December 4, 2010, 0'Fn 6:00 p.m. to midnight. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARING HELD — ORDINANCE NO 2010 -17 GRANTED FIRST READING - AMENDING SECTION 850, NON- CONFORMING BUILDINGS AND USES AND ADDITIONS TO OR REPLACEMENT OF HOMES WITH A FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION OVER ONE FOOT ABOVE THE EXISTING HOMES FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Planning Director Teague explained the Minnesota Supreme Court recently rejected its 20- year -old ruling of "undue hardship" for variance review. In light of that ruling, Edina was considering an ordinance amendment that would allow expansion of non - conforming structures to match existing non - conforming setbacks, rather than granting a variance, which had been the standard in Edina prior to this ruling. He reviewed variances granted during the past three years and presented the ordinance amendment to allow an addition into an existing nonconforming setback up to a maximum 200 square feet on each existing non - conforming level of the home, or to match the existing nonconforming square footage of the home, whichever was less. It would also require a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for additions, repairs, replacement and restoration to single dwelling unit http: / /www.ci. edina. mn. us/ CityCouncil/ CityCouncil— MeetingMinutesl20101116Reg.htm 12/16/2010 Nqv. 16, 2010 City Council Meeting Minutes Page 4 of 9 buildings with a first floor elevation of more than one foot above the existing dwelling unit building. Both amendments would apply only to properties zoned R -1 and R -2. Staff and the Planning Commission recommended first reading of the ordinance amendment to Section 850. The Council discussed the amendment, the importance of maintaining the "character of the neighborhood ", and a desire to assure an eight -foot ceiling height could be maintained for living spaces, (even a walkout basement) should there be groundwater issues present. Mr. Teague described available options explaining why it would be difficult to obtain a variance since it was possible to lower the basement floor to obtain an eight -foot ceiling. It was noted that in the event of a groundwater issue and variance request, proof of extenuating circumstances might require a hydrologic engineering study by a "licensed design professional." The Council requested additional information on this issue prior to second reading to assure passage of the ordinance amendment would not create unforeseen problems. The Council noted that a revision would be made to Page 2, Section B.ii., to change the word "used" to the word "constructed." Other grammatical changes were also noted. The Council acknowledged the work of the Planning Commission and staff in drafting the ordinance amendments. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:18 p.m. Public Testimony Connie Carrino, 4509 Garrison Lane, addressed the Council. Jeff Miller, 4509 Garrison Lane, addressed the Council. Janey Westin, 6136 Brookview Avenue, addressed the Council. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council discussed the issues raised during public testimony and asked questions of Mr. Teague.. The Council reviewed the three portals, one of which must be met, in addition to the fourth portal that must always be met for additions to or replacement of single dwelling unit buildings with a first floor elevation of more than one foot above the existing first floor elevation of the existing dwelling unit building. The fourth portal indicated: "An increase in first floor elevation will only be permitted if the new structure or addition fits the character of the neighborhood." It was agreed that dissimilar homes were part of the evolution of the City's housing stock and while some residents had called for creation of a Design Review Board, the Council had instead regulated via code regulations on setbacks and heights. Concern was expressed with the subjective wording of the fourth portal, opportunity for an arbitrary decision, and whether it was needed given the City's massing threshold. Mr. Teague advised the fourth portal provided a tool to not allow a project that was grossly out of scale with the neighborhood. Attorney Knutson agreed that as written, the fourth portal was open ended and adding "mass, height, and scale" language would address the Council's concern. It was noted that the majority of property in Edina does not have water issues and if the fourth portal was removed, the three portals and first floor elevation needed to be more prescriptive. Council consensus was reached to retain and revise the fourth portal to add: "mass, height, and scale" language. The Council agreed the FEMA floodplain was a good reference and to add a definition of the FEMA flood floor elevation. It was also agreed that the second portal needed specificity with regard to the type of work to be done, cost for that work, and measurement by a hydrologist. The term "licensed design professional" was revised to indicate "licensed hydrologist." Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, to grant First Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2010 -17, amending the Zoning Ordinance concerning nonconforming buildings and uses and additions to or replacement of homes http: / /www.ci. edina. mn. us/ CityCouncil/ CityCouncil _MeetingMinutesl20101116Reg.htm 12/16/2010 Nov. 16, 2010 City Council Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 9 with a first floor elevation over one foot above the existing homes first floor elevation, subject to wording revisions as discussed. It was agreed that since another public hearing was not held for second reading, the final revision would be available by December 7, 2010, for public review with second reading scheduled for December 21, 2010. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ELD — ORDINANCE NO 2010 -18 GRANTED FIRST READING — AMENDING SECTION 850, lnlICTQATIMU ANn aRnrFniIRFS AND FSTARL ISHING A PLANE' D UNIT DISTRICT Affidavits of Notice presente nd ordered placed on file. j Mr. Teague presented a ordinance amendment and explained the primal'y benefits of creating a Planned Unit District (PUD) zoning dis rict was to allow the City more control over proposed new development to allow flexibility in certain devel Rment standards in exchange for greater standards and control. He explained the City's current tools for rez6 ing were to place conditions on approy�(s. However, as time passes, conditions could become problematic t enforce and once the site was rezoned and the final development plan approved, the underlying zoning ordinan a dictated what could and could riot be done. With a PUD rezoning, any conditions placed on approval ere written into the Zoning ordinance and became the regulation for that site. Mr. Teague advised that in each i stance, a request for a PUD rezoning was a public policy decision by the Council to make in its legislative c acity. Mr. Teague summarized the propose ordinance thawould amend the entire administrative and procedural sections and add the PUD zoning distr t, reflect st4t6tory language, and make the ordinance easier to navigate. He also provided an explanation of the oposed'process to consider an ordinance text amendment. The City Council requested the definition of "text mendment" be included prior to second reading. Following discussion, the Council requeste '/tall provide clarification on the following prior to second reading: Page 2, Point 5, clarify language so it was Vnl '�rstood the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals was not automatically appealed. Mr. Teague explaine that anyone outside of staff would be able to appeal the decision. Correct Heritage Preserva�,on Commission" to "Heritage Preservation Board ". Page 7, Subsection A., Purpose, remove the words "with the." Page 2% Section b.ii., considered to be superfluous and would be deleted. Page 30, Section 3.c., indicate sketch pla s would be provided to the Council for informational purposes only. Page 36, Section'., refine the tang �ge regarding subjective review and delete second sentence since State action within 60 da s was already refere ced on Page 1. Revise language regarding traffic review to indicate "road capacities" ratr than "road capability" The Council extended its appreciation to the Planning Commission and staff for i%Work on the proposed ordance amendment. Mayor Hovland opened/6e public hearing at 9:26 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared td comment. \ / motion, seconded b Member Housh to close the public hearing. Member Swens made a mot o y q Ayes: Bennet Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland \ Motion car r; d. �\ Member S nson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to g ant First Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2010 -18 , mending the Zoning Ordinance concerning administration and procedures and establishing a PUD District, subject to wording revisions as discussed. http: / /www.ci. edina. mn. us/ CityCouncil/ CityCouncil _MeetingMinutesl20101116Reg.htm 12/16/2010 a MEETING MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, October 27, 2010 Edina City Hall Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Fischer, Carpenter, Risser, Scherer, Staunton, Schroeder, Brown, Grabiel, Forrest, Rock, Stefanik STAFF PRESENT: Teague, Aaker, Hoogenakker I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: The minutes of the September 29, 2010, meeting was filed as submitted. II. OLD BUSINESS:, 2009.0004.10 Zoning Ordinance Amendments 1. Non - Conforming Use /Alternate Setback Standard Ordinance 2. Driveway Width 3. PUD Introduction Planner Teague addressed the Commission and explained since their last meeting planning staff and Roger Knutson's staff reviewed the three ordinances and made grammatical changes and ensured consistency. Teague noted the majority of changes to the text occurred in the Non - Conforming Use /Alternate Setback Standard Ordinance; specifically the Conditional Use Permit addressing additions, repairs, etc. Three "conditions" were incorporated into the Conditional Use Permit process when the first floor is raised by more than one foot; 1) FEMA, 2) Groundwater, and 3) Building Code. Teague said all or one of these conditional must also meet a fourth condition: ensuring that the new structure or addition fit the character of the neighborhood. Continuing, Teague noted changes from Chair Fischer and informed the Commission that Connie Carrino has also submitted language pertaining to the Non - Conforming Use /Alternate Setback Ordinance as it relates to the first floor elevation for their review. 2. Driveway Width Ordinance Jared Anderson, 4004 Monterey Avenue addressed the Commission and explained that he lives in a 1938 home with a one -stall garage. Mr. Anderson said he would like to add a detached garage to the rear of his home but because of the 12 -foot driveway width requirement he can't do that. Chair Fischer said the proposed ordinance eliminates a minimum driveway width. Mr. Anderson thanked the Commission for their work on this issue. Motion Commissioner Grabiel moved to recommend adoption of the Ordinance Amending the Zoning Ordinance Concerning Driveways. Commissioner Risser seconded -.the motion.: All -voted aye; motion carried. 3. Nonconforming Buildings and Uses., Chair Fischer addressed the Commission and said at the last Commission meeting changes were accepted and made to the proposed ordinance, adding the majority of the discussion and changes focused on the Conditional Use element of the ordinance and three conditions relating to the first floor elevation of more than one (1) foot above the existing first floor elevation of the existing; dwelling unit. Fischer noted in the text presented this evening that additional language was added ta�address State Building Code, City of Edina Code, and other relevant agency requirements. Fischer stated he thought this: was' an important addition to the ordinance to minimize conflict between ordinances, state and bluilding codes, etc. Fischer gave brief examples of Code c conflicts. Chair Fischer directed the Commissions attention to a -mails between Roger Knutson and City Staff and Section 3. I. and the term "relevant agency requirements'. Fischer said Knutson suggested eliminating "other relevant agency requirements" and replacing that with "other statutory requirements ". Chair Fischer said in going through the amended language another issue that was brought up at the last meeting was, requiring documentation of ground water by a hydrologist adding after reviewing the building and engineering code requirements it was found that code already requires property owners to hire geotechnical engineers. Fischer asked the Commission. what language they are comfortable with to ensure that ground water issues are present; and if so, how are they addressed. Commissioner Brown commented that the Commission needs to determine who is credible in addressing the ground water issue to document there is an issue, and if so how to correct it. 3 MEETING MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, October 27, 2010 Edina City Hall Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Fischer, Carpenter, Risser, Scherer, Staunton, Schroeder, Brown, Grabiel, Forrest, Rock, Stefanik STAFF PRESENT: Teague, Aaker, Hoogenakker I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: The minutes of the September 29, 2010, meeting was filed as submitted. 11. OLD BUSINESS: 2009.0004.10 Zoning Ordinance Amendments 1. Non - Conforming Use /Alternate Setback-Standard Ordinance 2. Driveway Width 3. PUD Introduction Planner Teague addressed the Commission and explained since their last meeting planning staff and Roger Knutson's staff reviewed the three ordinances and made grammatical changes and ensured consistency. Teague noted the majority of changes to the text occurred in the Non - Conforming Use /Alternate Setback Standard Ordinance; specifically the Conditional Use Permit addressing additions, repairs, etc. Three "conditions" were incorporated into the Conditional Use Permit process when the first floor is raised by more than one foot; 1) FEMA, 2) Groundwater, and 3) Building Code. Teague said all or one of these conditional must also meet a fourth condition: ensuring that the new structure or addition fit the character of the neighborhood. Continuing, Teague noted changes from Chair Fischer and informed the Commission that Connie Carrino has also submitted language pertaining to the Non - Conforming Use /Alternate Setback Ordinance as it relates to the first floor elevation for their review. 2. Driveway Width Ordinance Jared Anderson, 4004 Monterey Avenue addressed the Commission and explained that he lives in a 1938 home with a one -stall garage. Mr. Anderson said he would like to add a detached garage to the rear of his home but because of the 12 -foot driveway width requirement he can't do that. Chair Fischer said the proposed ordinance eliminates a minimum driveway width. Mr. Anderson thanked the Commission for their work on this issue. . Motion Commissioner Grabiel moved to recommend adoption of the Ordinance Amending the Zoning Ordinance Concerning Driveways. Commissioner Risser seconded} the motion: - All- voted aye; motion: carried. 3. Nonconforming Buildings and Uses,, Chair Fischer addressed the Commission and said at the last Commission meeting changes were accepted and made to the ptoposed'ordinance, adding the majority of the discussion and changes focused on the Conditional Use element Of the ordinance and three conditions relating to the first floor elevation of more than one (1) foot above the existing first floor elevation of the existing�dwelling,unit. Fischer noted in the text presented this evening`;that additional larguage was added to address State Building Code, City of. Edina Code, and other relevant agency requirements. Fischer stated he thought this was an important addition to the ordinance to minimize conflict between ordinances, state and building codes, etc. Fischer gave brief examples of Code conflicts. Chair Fischer directed the Commissions attention to a -mails between Roger Knutson and City Staff and Section 3. I. and the term "relevant agency requirements ". Fischer said Knutson suggested eliminating "other relevant agency requirements" and replacing that with "other statutory requirements ". Chair Fischer said in going through the amended language another issue that was brought up at the last meeting was. requiring documentation of ground water by a hydrologist adding after reviewing the building and engineering code requirements it was found that code already requires property owners to hire geotechnical engineers. Fischer asked the Commission what language they are comfortable with to ensure that ground water issues are present; and if so, how are they addressed. Commissioner Brown commented that the Commission needs to determine who is credible in addressing the ground water issue to document there is an issue, and if so how to correct it. 3 .SeP4. P`t) U O a I aa,b 2009.0004.10 Zoning Ordinance 1. Non - conforming Use /Alternate Setback Standard Ordinance 2. Driveway Width 3. PUD Introduction Chair Fischer briefed the Commission and audience and explained that for the past 18 months the Zoning Ordinance Update Committee /Planning Commission has been discussing and conducting work session meetings on amendments to Edina's zoning ordinance 850. Fischer said some of the goals of the amendment process have been achieved and the Committee continues to work on others. Fischer reported that a recent Minnesota Supreme Court decision on the way municipalities review variances had been changed creating the need for cities to readdress how variances are granted; adding another issue to address during the amendment process. Fischer said the City of Edina is now working on a way to address this recent change through a non- conforming use or alternate setback ordinance. Chair Fischer said three issues would be discussed this evening with a brief presentation by Planner Teague on each: • PUD • Non - conforming use or alternate setback ordinance • Driveway width Planner Presentation Administration and Procedures and establishing a PUD District Planner Teague said in his opinion there are two primary benefits of having PUD zoning. First it allows the City more control over development proposals and secondly it allows flexibility. Teague said that establishing a PUD is legislative (City Council) and if the Council were to elect the PUD process specific conditions could be required as conditions of approval. Planner Teague highlighted the Table of Contents expanding on eight revisions to 850.04 Administration and Procedures as follows: Adds language regarding the 60 /120 -day rule. (State Statute) — E Planner Teague briefly outlined where the Committee /Commission was in this process pointing out that when discussing PUD it should be noted that a PUD is not permitted in the R -1, R -2 or PRD 1 & 2 zoning districts. Teague said the PUD process continues to be a 2 -step process; preliminary and final. Teague added there are concerns with the 60 /120 -day rule and ensuring that the 2 -step process falls within those 120 -days. Attorney Knutson said there isn't a lot of case law "on the books" concerning this requirement, adding an applicant can be sent to as many committees /sub- committees as directed; however an applicant should be able to expect final action within the 120 days. Teague did acknowledge that the City can request additional time above and beyond the 120 -days; however, staff needs to keep abreast of the timeline. 7. Suggests new CUP standards as recommended by the City Attorney. 8. Eliminates temporary CUP's which are not legal. Alternative Setback/Non- conforming Use Ordinance Planner Teague reported that a recent Minnesota Supreme Court decision rejected a 20 -year old ruling regarding the meaning of "undue hardship" in regard to review of variances. Teague said in light of this ruling many cities, including Edina, are considering an ordinance amendment to allow expansion of non - conforming structures, rather than variances. The previous ruling of "undue hardship" meant that cities could determine if the ordinance prevented a "reasonable use" of property. The new ruling holds that a variance cannot be approved unless the ordinance prevents all reasonable use of the property, reiterating this is a major change in the criteria for granting a variance. Continuing, Teague said to provide some background in drafting the proposed ordinance alternative setback/non- conforming use ordinance staff researched variances that have been granted in the past. Over the past 3'/2 years 154 residential variances were requested. Of those 154 variances nearly half were for expansion to homes that had non - conforming setbacks. The research found that the variances granted were as low as 13 square feet and as high as 1,000 square feet with an average of around 200 square feet which is the basis for the 200 square foot maximum encroachment suggested in the ordinance amendment. With graphics Teague illustrated examples of non - conforming structures and how the proposed ordinance amendment would work. Continuing, Teague explained another aspect of the proposed ordnance amendments address the one -foot rule. Teague stated that staff wrestled with this, noting the one - foot rule is recent, adding since it was established there have been six variance requests from the rule. Concluding, Teague stated staff proposes to address this through Conditional Use. 11 A discussion ensued and it was agreed that for the present time to leave the ordinance as is; PUD is not permitted in the R -1, R -2, PRD 1 & 2 zoning district. It was also noted the Comprehensive Plan is another way to gauge redevelopment potential. Chair Fischer directed the discussion to the question if new construction would be considered. Planner Teague responded that if a house is torn down it becomes a vacant lot. It doesn't apply; however, one can still apply for a variance. In conclusion focus was directed by Chair Fischer to the PUD ordinance. Fischer said he would like to again stress that an applicant should be encouraged to hold a neighborhood meeting. Commissioners agreed and noted that all means available to the City to "get the word out" would be used to ensure that residents are aware of developments /redevelopments in their neighborhood. It was further noted that a Sketch Plan Review meeting occurs at both the Planning Commission and Council level and would be found on both agendas. Residents can also sign up for City Extra to keep abreast of what's going on in the City. The following changes to the "Ordinance Amending the Zoning Ordinance Concerning Administration and Procedures and Establishing a PUD District" were reiterated as follows: As previously mentioned pg. 8 1. Eliminate the word strongly... "Applicants are encouraged ". It would also be beneficial in this area to have a reference that encourages the applicant to hold a neighborhood meeting. Also on pg. 8. #1. Eliminate i. as written and replace with: "Additional information that demonstrates the nature, intent, or benefit of the proposed development ". Note that this sentence could also be added to "Site Plan Review ". On Pg. 10. G. - Strike the word generally. It was proposed that any references to "scale of plan, site plan drawn to scale" on pages 10 & 16 be "cleaned -up" and made consistent. Mr. Knutson said his staff would incorporate to the best of their ability all changes expressed this evening, adding his staff also proofs for grammar and punctuation. Planner Teague said Planning Staff also reviews and proofs the proposed ordinance changes. Motion Commissioner Grabiel moved to recommend that the City Council amends 850.04 "An Ordinance Amending the Zoning Ordinance Concerning Administration and Procedures and Establishing a PUD District" as presented; including comments and corrections from Commissioners. Commissioner Risser seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. 13 driveway materials, "dust- free" and definition of driveway could wait for further discussion Chair Fischer noted that a number of changes to the draft ordinances have been proposed, adding it may be a good idea to have Planning Staff and the City Attorney's office review and make the suggested changes, check for grammar, etc. and present all three ordinance amendments to the Commission at their October meeting. Commissioners agreed this was best. IV. COMMUNITY COMMENT: None. V. INTRAGOVERNMENTAL BUSINESS: Chair Fischer acknowledged receipt of the Council Connection and asked Commission liaisons if they had anything to add. Commissioner Risser said that the Energy and Environment Commission is encouraging everyone to winterize. Risser also reported that if anyone has a rain barrel the barrel should be drained before it freezes to prevent cracks. VI. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Carpenter moved meeting adjournment at 10:34 pm. Commissioner Risser seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Respectfully submitted: 09aekle 0900jeAa"et 15 MINUTES ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, 2010 EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS OPEN HOUSE MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE: Fischer, Carpenter, Risser, Staunton, Schroeder, Brown, Grabiel, Forrest STAFF IN ATTENDANCE: Teague, Aaker and Hoogenakker OTHERS PRESENT: Bennett, Brindle, Carrino, Miller, Porter, Carrino, Westin, Whitbeck, Kresner, Freudnthal Introduction: Chair Fischer informed Members that the Zoning Ordinance Update Committee (ZOUC) continues its overhaul of the zoning ordinance, adding to date the Commission has amended the ordinance regarding building height by creating a building height overlay district. The Committee also amended the front street setback portion of the ordinance. Fischer said their focus tonight is on the language proposed for the non - conforming setback standards, PUD and driveway width. Chair Fischer thanked everyone for attending the open house and opened the discussion on Driveway Width. Topic Driveway Width Introduced: November 24, 2009 Continued discussion: September 15, 2010 Driveway Width /Zoning Ordinance 850.08 Chair Fischer gave background information on the continuing requests for a variance from the existing driveway width minimum width of 12 feet. Fischer said what the Committee has recommended is that there is no minimum driveway width; however there would be a maximum width proposed at 30 -feet or the width of the garage whichever is larger. The following questions were raised: • Are parking pads included in the 30 -foot maximum width or in front of the garage doors? Many property owners want a parking pad to park excess vehicles (i.e. When kids begin to drive, etc.). Chair Fischer said the formation of a PUD ordinance would add flexibility to the ordinance. A PUD is a custom zoning district aimed at benefiting the City. Fischer said a PUD is a legislative decision and the conditions stipulated as a condition of approval become the zoning. Fischer also noted that the Committee agreed to prohibit PUD in all R -1, R -2 and PRD -1 zoning districts. . Planner Teague explained another thing to remember is that a PUD still needs to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan . Teague said the majority of the cities in the Metropolitan area have PUD as part of their ordinance, reiterating Fischer said that PUD provides the City with flexibility. The discussion continued addressing Sketch Plan Review and the ongoing discussion on if Sketch Plan Review should be mandatory or elective. It was acknowledged that some feel sketch plan review should be mandatory; however, the City needs to remain ..mindful of the "120 rule ". The following comments were made on Sketch Plan Review: • The intent of the Sketch Plan Review was to streamline the process. How does the Committee find a balance? • Should the Sketch Plan Review be required to go before both the Commission and Council, or just one? Note that if Sketch Plan Review is required the "clock starts ticking" and the 120 -rule starts. • How does the City "get the word out "? Residents need to be a part of this process; it's critical to success. City Extra, Sun Current all tools to implement "getting the word out ". Topic: Non - conforming /Alternate Setback Standards: Planner Teague said with the recent Supreme Court ruling it became difficult for all Minnesota cities to administer variances as they had in the past. Teague said cities are now looking at different ways to address variances. Teague reported staff reviewed variances over the last 3 Y2 years and found that one -half of the City's variances were for non - conforming structures. Teague said to add some background that 5 %of the total building permits applied for required a variance. Teague concluded that the difficulty in finding a solution to the ruling is establishing a rule that works for the entire City. The following comments were made: • The front yard setback standard has been changed. Has this recent change impacted properties creating the need for variances? • Do building codes create instances where variances are necessary? • Articulate "what's reasonable ". L! MINUTES ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 1, 2010 EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE: Fischer, Carpenter, Risser, Scherer, Staunton, Schroeder, Brown, Grabiel, Forrest, Kata STAFF IN ATTENDANCE: Teague, Aaker and Hoogenakker OTHERS PRESENT: Hansen, Carrino, Busyn, Rhode, Porter Clibi'r Fischer'told the Commission the ZOUC tias'.been working for the past 18`months on ;rewriting the,: zoning adding in]ight of,a recent�Minnesota Suprerg' 6, rt decision rejectirig,;a 20 year old ruling regarding the meaning_of "undue hardship ".the "re= write committee" has anothe�'.item to renew; the Non- Conforming.,Use ordinance. Chair Fisch er said: at this`aime'tfe ZOUC would discuss the Non- Conforming use ordinance, Driveway Width an&PUD. Nevi : Topic:., Non-Conf ernina Use Ordinance Date.lntroduced: September 1; 2010;;: Planner Teague reiterated that the recent Supreme Court's ruling rejecting the meaning of "undue hardship" created the need for many cities, including Edina, to consider an ordinance amendment to allow the expansion of non - conforming structures to match existing non - conforming setbacks. Planner Teague also noted that additionally the City of Edina amended the ordinance on first floor building height for new homes after a tear down. This recent amendment was adopted to address the massing issue. Teague reported since that change the City has granted six variances to allow a taller first -floor elevation than the one -foot that was recently adopted. Continuing, Planner Teague said there are instances where it was /is best to elevate the new home to get it out of an area with a high water table or flood plain. Chair Fischer opened the discussion on the Non - Conforming Use Ordinance. Discussion A discussion ensued with Committee Members asking who reviews the building permit/site plans regarding ground water and flood plain and questioned where the "four- feet" came from. Page 1 of 5 front of the house to the west. He explained that the house to the west was positioned deep on the lot. This placement limits redevelopment options for his home. Andy. Porter, 6125 Westridge Road, addressed the Committee and said his issue is with the front street setback requirement. He suggested that the ordinance be amended to require a front yard setback 1000 feet; adding it's probably ridiculous notion, but requesting a setback from that standard would be reasonable. The discussion continued with the following points being made: • Acknowledge there are instances of hardship. • Be careful that any changes to the ordinance don't create unbuildable lots. • Is making setbacks "extreme" as mentioned by Mr. Porter a way to approach the new ruling. • Acknowledge that water bodies, flood plain and high water tables are present in di�a;;and need to be addressed. • Have staff research and tabulate the number of existing non -conforming properties;that received variances for the past few years. •.. Carefully 'research :the corner lot and :multiple street lots: Driveway Width:; :, ;. Date:Introduced.;Novemfe -::24, 2009 Continued Discussion September 1, 20.10 Chair Fischer opened the discussion on Driveway Width with;the following comments made by Memib i s: There was agreement on no :,minimum driveway width but would establishing a maximum, as recommended be difficult to achieve. Be cognizant that driveways are not included when calculating lot coverage. Consider amending that? • Note that in Edina there are a number of properties that have parking pads and turnarounds. • If Edina isn't experiencing any problems with overly large driveways, etc. why make a rule. • The current ordinance does not contain a definition for driveway. • Should driveway requirements be different for differing zoning districts? The discussion continued on materials used for driveways with the following points being made: Permeable pavers are OK, the language allows it, but should the City require the pavers to be concrete or brick? There are other materials in the industry that are used as "pavers ". What's the purpose of no gravel? Gravel materials have changed and some materials in the industry may be considered /advertised as "dust free ". Page 3 of 5 • Is this creating a two -step process when it was only a one -step process? • The variance process is different between residential and commercial. If a PUD is established variances on the commercial level would be minimal. • Which body would conduct the public hearing? • Should both the Planning Commission and City Council hold the public hearings? • Would the City Council be able to handle the number of variances the City usually receives in one year (acknowledging that may change as the result of the Supreme Court decision) — would the suggestion of placing a variance request as consent be possible. Chair Fischer said he believes that the Committee decided to recommend to the City Council that the Planning Commission would become the Zoning Board of Appeals. Member Brown agreed; however as previously mentioned having the Planning Commission as the Zoning Board of Appeals creates a two -step process and simplicity is best. Planner Teague pointed out another thing to consider is timing. The 60 -day rule - applies Member Grabiel raised the pomtVith regard 16 sketch plan review that in his opinion this :i'6iew shouldn't be formal, adding in the beginning of th&Aiscussions on this issue he felt the review should be informal; more of.'a coricept without the plans set iii stone. Planner Teague reiterated if sketch plan review is `mandatory fhe clock starts ticking It was suggested that on page 28, 3 b. be removed , Chair Fischer thanked everyone for attending and' the f' (lowing dates as follow -up meetings to thjs.:work session: Se'pten' ber 7 — joint meeting With: the City Council September 8 — Work Session September 15 — Open House Work Session adjourned at 10:00 pm. Page 5 of 5 MINUTES OF THE EDINA `- ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE COMMITTEE MAY 12, 2010, 7:00 PM EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS Planning Commissioners in Attendance: Mike Fischer, Kevin Staunton, Arlene Forrest, Nancy Scherer and Steve Brown Staff in Attendance: Cary Teague, Kris Aaker and Jackie Hoogenakker Others Present: Roger Knutson, City Attorney Residents in Attendance: Josh Sprague John Bohan I. APPROVAL OF WORK SESSION MINUTES: There were no minutes to approve. II. OLD BUSINESS: PUD /Sketch Plan Review Introduction Planner Teague explained that the discussion on establishing a process for a PUD began in January and during the following discussions the topic of "sketch plan review" came up. Pia. nner Teague asked Members to recall that at the last Zoning Ordinance work session the.minimum lot size requirement for a PUD was removed and a PUD would not be considered for R -1, R -2, Prd -1 and PRD -2 zoning districts. It was also recommended that a "sketch plan review" be mandatory for a PUD /rezoning. Continuing, Planner Teague said as the discussion progressed on'sketch plan review guidelines it came apparent that there was some confusion with sketch plan review and the 60 -day rule. Concluding, Planner Teague said Roger Knutson, City Attorney is present to clarify any questions Members may have on the part sketch plan review plays in the process. Discussion Mr. Knutson informed the Commission that pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, an application for Sketch Plan approval /review shall be approved or denied within sixty (60) that with a PUD a °concept/sketcV plan. review would be a requirement. It was also suggested that a rezoning would also require a °sketch /concept" plan review. It was further suggested that a checklist be established outlining what is required for each application and that the. checklist be located on/or attached to the application. The checklist would encourage . a. nd/or highly recommend a neighborhood meeting and sketch= pIanreview for other applications. The discussion continued with Members asking who would write the new ordinances noting there are many changes that need- to be implemented that haven't beery touched on. It was acknowledged that there is an informal draftfor a PUD, but it's only in the draft stages. Members asked Mr. Knutson if he has any. ideas or*i how to j�aceed with the re -write process on the more complicated zoning issue�fPUD). Mr. C��utson said the majority of cities he works with hire a consultant to,: dt A"'a new ordinance Mr. Knutson said if the Commissionwas only tackling specifc's,ktions of the ordinance::to meet. Met Council requirements that's one thing; howevei�:it appeals that the pent intent is to j. completely re -write the entire zoning ordinance'addin- #hat's the case:a.consultant may be the way to proceed. Mr. *Abtson suggested: #fiat the Commission talk to the City Council to see if funds are ever�al ailable for an`"bldanance re- write. The discussion ensued with Chair Fischer rehir===ing Mem ers that the Planning Commission will met #:vith `ahe, City Council on At "this meeting the Commission will update the Council on tHie,re =write process and the Commission could also suggest hiring'a :consultant',W complete d & re -write of the ordinance. Chair Fischer said he envisions a' /Z hour repgifon where -the Commission has been and where we are going... r - x C;- f. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 24, 2010 Page 4 of 8 Public Comment John Bo n, 800 Coventry, told the Commission he believes the podium height (2 -story at street level) concept resulted from conversations with merchants and residents the Cahill and West 70th Street neighborhood. Mr. Bohan also referred to the dra uilding height overlay district as it relates to C ntennial Lakes, HOD-4, pointi out the map indicates 4- stories; howev , the Coventry at Centennial Lakes is only tones. Chair Fischer said he re ed the discussion on Centennial Lakes and as Planner Teague if the r soning behind the 4- stories is that sites with a Simi zoning designati must be treated equally. Planner Teague responded that is rrect. Conti ing, Planner Teague pointed out that currently there is no height li ' in th entennial Lakes area. The proposed ordinance would reduce heigh this area possibly more than any other in the City. Action Commissioner Staunto moved to recommend a tion of an Ordinance amending the Zonin rdinance to add a Building light Overlay District, pages Al -A6, incl ding the most recent appendix A, a the March 24, 2010 memo with the nderstanding that this amendment imp height wherever it as dictated in the Comprehensive Plan by I rting it into the height ov lay district, and where the Comprehensive Plan s silent the current zoning restrictions regarding height would be retaine . Commissioner Brown seconded the motion. Ayes; Carpenter, ser, Scherer, Staunton, Brown Grabiel, Forrest, Fischer. Nay; Schroe r. Motion carried 8 -1 Discussion - Planned Unit Development Planner Presentation Planner Teague reminded the Commission the PUD topic has been separated into four separate elements: 1) Purpose and Intent (goals) 2) Applicability /Criteria; 3) Process /Procedures; and 4) Rules /Standards. Planner Teague said the topic this evening is Rules /Standards. Planner Teague said what has been discussed up to this point and potential language that could be used as the Rules /Standards section. Planner Teague reminded the Commission at the past meetings discussion the two acre minimum requirement was removed, and a sketch plan is required for a PUD or rezoning. A public meeting is required and residents within 1,000 feet would be notified; and the Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 24, 2010 Page 6 of 8 comments from Commissioner Grabiel (depending on what Mr. Knutson says) that the formalities could be minimized. She said posting the sketch plan review meeting instead of mailings, etc. should suffice and staff /commission encouraging an applicant to meet with neighboring property owners (prior to the public hearing) so no one is blind sighted would be good advice. Commissioner Brown said his understanding of a sketch plan review was to provide the Commission with the opportunity to offer feedback to an applicant on how nine Commissioners felt about a certain proposal. Commissioner Brown said his understanding was that this meeting would be less formal; only providing the.applicant with feedback and was not part of an official public hearing process. Public meeting, not hearing. Commissioner Schroeder asked Planner Teague if a sketch plan application is made what right(s) does the Commission grant the developer. Planner Teague responded that the sketch plan review meeting does not afford the applicant any rights. A sketch plan review meeting provides only feedback, no Aye, Nay action. Commissioner Staunton pointed out #3 on procedures which indicates approved or denied, adding that language needs to be addressed, noting that further along in the ordinance it states any opinions or comments are advisory. Planner Teague agreed that the language needs to be re- addressed and clarified by the City Attorney. Chair Fischer noted that at the last meeting the Commission talked to a developer about the benefit of a sketch plan review, adding in his opinion a sketch plan review benefits everyone, applicant, staff, Commission and the neighbors. Commissioner Grabiel questioned what would stop a developer from using the Community Comment section on the Agenda to solicit ideas from the Commission as long as no formal application has been made. Commissioner Grabiel said the goal is not to exclude the public in the process but to provide feedback. If everything is formalized the sketch plan review would just add another step to the process. Commissioner Brown suggested that to "get around" the time frame constraints that the applicant could withdraw an application and reapply. Planner Teague agreed. Each new application restarts the clock. Chair Fischer suggested that further discussion on the sketch plan review process be put on hold. Chair Fischer referred to the Rules /Standards portion of the ordinance and asked Planner Teague to briefly go through them. MINUTES OF THE EDINA ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE COMMITTEE MARCH 10. 2010,7:30 PM EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS Planning Commissioners in Attendance: Mike Fischer, Michael Schroeder, Kevin Staunton, Arlene Forrest, Jeff Carpenter, Floyd Grabiel and Steve Brown Staff.in Attendance: Cary Teague, Kris Aaker and Jackie Hoogenakker Residents in Attendance: Josh Sprague I. APPROVAL OF WORK SESSION MINUTES: The minutes of the February 10, Zoning Ordinance Update Committee was approved with changes from Chair Fischer. II. OLD TOPICS — CONTINUING DISCUSSION: Topic: Planned Unit Development (PUD) — Intent, Goals or Purpose Date Introduced: January 13, 2010 Date of Discussion: March 10, 2010 Introduction: Planner Teague told the Committee what will be discussed this evening is the third element of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) which is Process /Procedures. Planner Teague asked Committee Members to note the maps provided indicating the City's existing arterial roadways. Planner Teague pointed out most of the City's commercial, industrial and high density residential areas are located on these roadways and would be eligible for a PUD if the property were less than two acres, according to the current draft language. Planner Teague noted that areas that are not included would be the Cahill industrial area, and the Valley View Road and Wooddale area. Planner Teague said the Industrial properties along Cahill road could be considered a transition area between land uses and would also qualify. The two acre minimum in other areas would encourage the consolidation of lots in order to qualify for a PUD. Zoning Ordinance Update Committee Work Session Minutes March 10, 2010 Page 3 of b Planner Teague wondered if a sketch plan review meeting is required; would it take the place of the neighborhood meeting? Members acknowledged that was a fair question and a possibility. Chair Fischer said as he understands a "sketch plan review meeting" that only non - binding "comments" from staff, commission and residents would be taken - there would be no vote. Member Forrest noted the sketch plan review meeting would be just that, a meeting; not a public hearing. The discussion continued with Committee Members going back and forth on if a sketch plan review meeting should be mandatory or elective. Members felt.that if a sketch plan review meeting is mandatory it should be mandatory for only a PUD /Rezoning with notification required. Members said the goal of the Sketch Plan Review is to achieve'a better product and not add confusion to the process. It was acknowledged a time line of the notice or of the sketch plan review would need to be established and adhered to: Action Committee Members recommended that a Sketch Plan Review meeting be a requirement of a PUD and /or Rezoning and formal notification should be given. A Sketch Plan Review meeting would be a voluntary option for all other applications. Chair Fischer said he would like to focus on the question raised by Planner Teague if there should be a minimum lot/parcel size stipulated for a PUD. After discussion, Committee Members suggested that staff strike the minimum size requirement. It was also stressed that the R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District, R -2, and PRD 1 Residential Zoning Districts would not be considered at this time for PUD designation. Topic: Building Height Date Introduced: February 24,, Date of Discussion: March 10, 20 Introduction Planner Teague briefed the Commissio reminding them at building height must be brought into compliance with a Comprehensive P n. Continuing Planner Teague said there are option to achieve compliance. 1. Establish an overlay district and 2. Write regulatio for each area described in the Comprehensive Plan. projects. Members also expressed the opinion that at this time a °PUD" would not be an option at the residential subdivision level. Mr. Bohan asked what triggers a PUD, and if that choice is left up to the applicant/developers? Mr. Bohan commented that in his opinion it would be difficult to provide answers in ordinance form before questions are even poised. Ms. Westin asked Planner Teague if other municipalities have PUD's? Planner Teague responded in the affirmative, adding to the best of his knowledge Edina is one of the few cities he's come across that doesn't have one. Commissioner Staunton pointed out that there is a wide variety of PUD's, each with differing thresholds and triggers. Commissioner Staunton said the ZOUC will need to be explicit in developing a PUD. Ms. Weston asked who would ultimately make the decision on developing a PUD and folding it into the ordinance. Chair Fischer said the City Council would ultimately have to amend the ordinance and approve established guidelines to determine eligibility for a PUD. Chair Fischer said from his experience the PUD process has been a vigorous process for the developer. Continuing, Chair Fischer stated he agrees with Commissioner Staunton's' comment that there are a number of PUD's styles "out there "; making it imperative that the criteria the Committee establishes for a PUD are as understandable as possible. Concluding, Chair Fischer said a PUD can offer more flexibility and could even be a stricter ordinance interpretation; however, much depends on the circumstance. Chair Fischer stated in Edina control rests with the City with the hope that the City gets the best project. Ms. Westin asked if a PUD wasn't an option in the ordinance would the City continue to have to amend the ordinance time and time again. Chair Fischer responded that could be the case, but not if the zoning was correct. Chair Fischer added that having a PUD isn't the "end all" the City still needs a good strong ordinance. A discussion ensued with Committee Members expressing that the Purpose and Intent section of the proposed PUD ordinance needs to be clear; providing procedures and standards that allow creatively and flexibility. The challenge is to write a PUD that benefits the City and its residents. Committee Members told Planner Teague the draft ordinance and the information he supplied was a great start. It was also expressed that the current ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan work. It was also acknowledged that the goal of implementing a PUD into the Code should be to ensure a higher quality project with great design by allowing the City and the developer to work with incentives in "getting what both want ". 4 ZOUC Minutes January 13, 2010 Page 5 of 8 Look at what other cities are doing with sustainable design. • Does the City want to create ordinances ahead of changes he building code? • The City Council needs to take a policy stand on sus nable design. Chair Fischer noted as s >in ly mentioned th ere are a number of issues to consider with sust esign, addin a public works site may be a good place to start. Continair Fisch aid what he believes the Committee needs to do at th o nue the discussion and have staff "find out" what other cities arwit rd to sustainable design, what terms to mandate and ho w itd. Con ding, Chair Fischer said he knows someone (Rick Carteas worked with ' neapolis, St. Paul, St Louis Park, and many other ities on this issue. would be willing to meet with the Committee an r any questions the Corn ' ee may have. Action Chair Fischer will i ite a colleague to speak to the Committee on sustainable desigO. We will invite the EEC to participate in that discussion. Staff would soliloft other cities to find out how they address sustainable design. C. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Date Introduced: January 13, 2010 Planner Teague addressed the Committee and informed them Edina is one of the few communities without a PUD. Continuing, Planner Teague reminded the Committee this topic has been brought up a number of times by the Planning Commission during review of development proposals. Planner Teague said the following needs to be considered in the decision making process: 1. Should the City adopt a PUD Ordinance? 2. If so, should additional conditions /standards be required? 3. What conditions /standards should be required? 4. Is a PUD the appropriate section of the Zoning Ordinance to require sustainable design principles? 5. Should there be a minimum lot area for a PUD? 6. When would a PUD be justified? 7. Would a PUD allow Edina greater development control? ZOUC Minutes _ January 13, 2010 Page 7 of 8 have been the better way to go. Mr. Bohan said if the Committee decides on a PUD process writing the parameters would be very important. Concluding, Mr. Bohan asked when the Committee was going to "tackle" building height. Planner Teague indicated that the Planning Commission would consider the issue at a regular Planning Commission meeting, likely to be held in February. Further discussion Chair Tischer commented with regard to the Gateway proposal (and other large projects in the City) that in a sense the City has had a PUD process; it just wasn't called that. At this time what is important is for the City to achieve the best development available; and that could be with a PUD designation. Member Schroeder stated he views the following four elements as key: 1. Intent or goals. Purpose of the PUD designations, and in particular what the City aims to achieve by granting a PUD; 2. Applicability /criteria. Limitations based on parcel size, land use designation, or other vactors defined by the ordinance; 3. Process /procedures. Methods of review that vary from the development review process for development under other zoning classifications; and 4. Rules /standards. Description of flexibility provided for projects under a PUD. Member Forrest commented that it appears to her that residents take comfort in the Zoning Ordinance. Member Grabiel pointed out that sometime in the future it is very possible that Southdale will be redeveloped; questioning what would be the best way to proceed. Continuing, Member Grabiel said the Committee needs to remember in all things (Sustainable Design, PUD) if there are performance standards there is enforcement. Chair Fischer said he views a "thorough" process in creating a PUD classification and developing sustainable design guidelines requiring multiple discussions. Chair Fischer said an important focus would be for the Committee to define intent. Continuing, Chair Fischer stated what needs to be addressed immediately (in the updating process) is building height. Planner Teague agreed, reiterating at the February meeting of the Planning Commission he plans to bring before them language relating to building height. Action Continue discussion on PUD. 326.02 LICENSURE OR CERTIFICATION. Subdivision 1. Licensure or certification mandatory. In order to safeguard life, health, and property, and to promote the public welfare, any person in either public or private capacity practicing, or offering to practice, architecture, professional engineering, land surveying, landscape architecture, or professional geoscience, or using the title certified interior designer in this state, either as an individual, a copartner, or as agent of another, shall be licensed or certified as hereinafter provided. It shall be unlawful for any person to practice, or to offer to practice, in this state, architecture, professional engineering, land surveying, landscape architecture, or professional geoscience, or to use the title certified interior designer, or to solicit or to contract to furnish work within the terms of sections 326.02 to 326.15, or to use in connection with the person's.name, or to otherwise assume, use or advertise any title or description tending to convey the impression that the person is an architect, professional engineer (hereinafter called engineer), land surveyor, landscape architect, professional geoscientist (hereinafter called geoscientist), or certified interior designer, unless such person is qualified by licensure or certification under sections 326.02 to 326.15. This subdivision does not preclude an individual who retired from one of the professions listed in this subdivision from using the designation architect, professional engineer, land surveyor, landscape architect, professional geoscientist, or certified interior designer as long as the designation is preceded by the word "retired" and the individual was licensed or certified in the designated profession in the state of Minnesota on the date the individual retired from the designated profession and the individual's license or certification was not subsequently revoked by the Board of Architecture, Engineering, Land Surveying, Landscape Architecture, Geoscience, and Interior Design. Subd. 2. Practice of architecture. Any person shall be deemed to be practicing architecture, within the meaning of sections 326.02 to 326.15, who holds out as being able to perform or who does perform any professional service, such as planning, design, or supervision of construction for the purpose of assuring compliance with specifications and design, in connection with any private or public buildings, structures or projects, or the equipment or utilities thereof, or the accessories thereto, wherein the safeguarding of life, health, or property is concerned or involved, when such professional service requires the application of the art and science of construction based upon the principles of mathematics, aesthetics, and the physical sciences, acquired by education or training, and by experience. For the purposes of this subdivision "supervision" is a professional service as distinguished from superintending of construction and means the performance or the supervision thereof, of reasonable and ordinary on the site observations to determine that the construction is in substantial compliance with the approved drawings, plans and specifications. Subd. 3. Practice of professional engineering. Any person shall be deemed to be practicing professional engineering within the meaning of sections 326.02 to 326.15 who holds out as being able to perform or who does perform any technical professional service, such as planning, design or observation of construction for the purpose of assuring compliance with specifications and design, in connection with any public or private structures, buildings, utilities, machines, equipment, processes, works, or projects wherein the public welfare or the safeguarding of life, health, or property is concerned or involved, when such professional service requires the application of the principles of mathematics and the physical and applied engineering sciences, acquired by education or training, and by experience. Subd. 3a. Practice of professional geoscience. A person is considered to be practicing professional geoscience within the meaning of sections 326.02 to 326.15 who holds out as being able to perform or who does perform any technical professional services, the adequate performance of which requires professional geoscience education, training, and experience in the application of special knowledge of the mathematical, physical, chemical, biological, and earth sciences to such services or creative work as consultation, investigation, evaluation, planning, mapping, and inspection of geoscientific work and its responsible supervision. A person is considered to practice or offer to practice professional geoscience, within the meaning and intent of sections 326.02 to 326.15 who practices any of the geoscience disciplines defined by the board; who by verbal claim, sign, advertisement, letterhead, card, or in any other way represents oneself to be a professional geoscientist; through the use of some other title implies that the person is a professional geoscientist; or who presents oneself as able to perform or who does perform any geoscience services or that constitutes the practice of a professional geoscience discipline as defined by the board. "Geoscience" means the science which includes treatment of the earth and its origin and history; the investigation, measurement or sampling, of the earth's constituent rocks, natural and induced fields of force, minerals, fossils, solids, soils, fluids including surface and underground waters, gases, and other materials; and the study, interpretation, and analysis of the natural agents, forces, and processes which cause changes in the earth. Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to prevent a professional engineer, as defined in sections 326.02 to 326.15, from acquiring engineering data involving soil, rock, groundwater, and other earth materials; evaluating physical and chemical properties of soil, rock, groundwater, and other earth materials for engineering; and from utilizing these data for analysis, design, and construction. Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to permit a professional geoscientist to engage in the practice of professional engineering, architecture, landscape architecture, or land surveying or to use the title "certified interior design" as those terms are defined in this section. Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to regulate persons who take soil samples for the purpose of providing recommendations on crop production. Subd. 4. Practice of land surveying. Land surveying means the application of the principles of mathematics, physical and applied sciences and law to measuring and locating lines, angles, elevations and natural or artificial features in the air, on the surface of the earth, underground and on the beds of bodies of water for the purpose of: (1) monumenting property boundaries; (2) planning, designing, and platting of land and subdivisions including the topography, alignment and grades of streets; and (3) preparing and perpetuating maps, record plats and property descriptions. Any person who offers to perform, holds out as being able to perform, or who does perform land surveying for others shall be practicing land surveying. Nothing contained in the provisions of sections 326.02 to 326.15, shall prohibit a licensed professional engineer, architect, landscape architect, or professional geoscientist from doing any work included in the practice of engineering, architecture, landscape architecture, and professional geoscience, if the work does not involve the establishment or reestablishment of property corners or property lines. Subd. 4a. Practice of landscape architecture. Any person shall be deemed to be practicing landscape architecture, within the meaning of sections 326.02 to 326.15, who holds out as being able to perform or who does perform any professional service in connection with the development of land areas where the dominant purpose of the service is the preservation, enhancement or determination of proper land uses, natural land features, ground cover and planting, naturalistic and aesthetic values, the settings, approaches or environment for structures or other improvements, and the consideration and determination of inherent problems of the land relating to erosion, wear and tear, blight and hazards. This practice shall include the location and arrangement of tangible objects and features incidental and necessary to the purposes outlined but shall not include the design of structures or facilities with separate and self - contained purposes as ordinarily included in the practice of engineering or architecture or the preparation of boundary surveys or final land plats, as ordinarily included in the practice of land surveying. Nothing contained in sections 326.02 to 326.15 concerning landscape architects shall be construed: (1) to apply to a professional engineer duly registered under the laws of this state; (2) to apply to an architect registered under the laws of this state; (3) to apply to a land surveyor registered under the laws of this state; (4) to prevent a registered architect or professional engineer from doing landscape planning and designing; (5) to exclude nursery operators or other small business people from the preparation of landscape plans appropriate to the normal operation of their business; (6) to authorize a landscape architect to engage in the practice of architecture, engineering, land surveying, or geoscience. No person shall use the designation landscape architect or any title or device indicating or representing that the person is a landscape architect or is practicing landscape architecture unless the person is registered under the provisions of sections 326.02 to 326.15. Subd. 4b. Certified interior designer. (a) For the purposes of sections 326.02 to 326.15, "certified interior designer" means a person who is certified under section 326. 10, to use the title certified interior designer and who provides services in connection with the design of public interior spaces, including preparation of documents relative to non -load- bearing interior construction, space planning, finish materials, and furnishings. (b) No person may use the title certified interior designer unless that person has been certified as an interior designer or has been exempted by the board. Registered architects may be certified without additional testing. Persons represent themselves to the public as certified interior designers if they use a title that incorporates the words certified interior designer. (c) Nothing in this section prohibits the use of the title interior designer or the term interior design by persons not certified by the board. (d) Nothing in this section restricts persons not certified by the board from providing interior design services and from saying that they provide such services, as long as they do not use the title certified interior designer. (e) Nothing in this section authorizes certified interior designers to engage in the practice of architecture as defined in subdivision 2 or the practice of engineering as defined in subdivision 3. Subd. 5. Limitation. The provisions of sections 326.02 to 326.15 shall not apply to the preparation of plans and specifications for the erection, enlargement, or alteration of any building or other structure by any person, for that person's exclusive occupancy or use, unless such occupancy or use involves the public health or safety or the health or safety of the employees of said person, or of the buildings listed in section 326.03, subdivision 2, nor to any detailed or shop plans required to be furnished by a contractor to a registered engineer, landscape architect, architect, or certified interior designer, nor to any standardized manufactured product, nor to any construction superintendent supervising the execution of work designed by an architect, landscape architect, engineer, or certified interior designer licensed or certified in accordance with section 326.03, nor to the planning for and supervision of the construction and installation of work by an electrical contractor or master plumber as defined in and licensed pursuant to this chapter, where such work is within the scope of such licensed activity and not within the practice of professional engineering, or architecture, or where the person does not claim to be a certified interior designer as defined in subdivision 2, 3, or 4b. History: (5697 -1) 1921 c 523 s 1; 1933 c 404 s 1; 1945 c 380 s 1; Ex1967 c 28 s 1; 1971 c 22 s 1 -3; 1973 c 245 s 1; 1975 c 329 s 1 -3; 1979 c 209 s 1; 1 Sp1981 c 4 art I s 25 -29; 1986 c 444; 1992 c 507 s 3 -5; 1995 c 206 s 4 -7; 2002 c 239 s I 326.03 LICENSE OR CERTIFICATE REQUIRED. Subdivision 1. Plans; documents. No person, except an architect, engineer, land surveyor, landscape architect, geoscientist, or certified interior designer, licensed or certified as provided for in sections 326.02 to 326.15 shall practice architecture, professional engineering, land surveying, landscape architecture, or professional geoscience, or use the title certified interior designer, respectively, in the preparation of plans, specifications, reports, plats or other architectural, engineering, land surveying, landscape architectural, geoscientific, or interior design documents, or in the observation of architectural, engineering, land surveying, landscape architectural, geoscientific, or interior design projects. In preparation of such documents, reasonable care shall be given to compliance with applicable laws, ordinances, and building codes relating to design. Subd. 2. Exceptions. Nothing contained in sections 326.02 to 326.15 shall prevent persons from advertising and performing services such as consultation, investigation, or evaluation in connection with, or from making plans and specifications for, or from supervising, the erection, enlargement, or alteration of any of the following buildings: (a) dwellings for single families, and outbuildings in connection therewith, such as barns and private garages; (b) two family dwellings; (c) any farm building or accessory thereto; or (d) temporary buildings or sheds used exclusively for construction purposes, not exceeding two stories in height, and not used for living quarters. Subd. 3. Recording. No plat, map, or drawing of any survey or subdivision of lands required by law to be filed or recorded with the county recorder or registered with the registrar of titles of any county, shall be filed, recorded, or registered therein unless there shall be endorsed thereon a certification by a licensed land surveyor. Subd. 4. Exception for persons elected in office. The provisions hereof shall not apply to any person holding an elective office when in discharging the duties thereof such person is required to do work or perform service of the character of work or service usually done or performed by an architect, engineer, land surveyor, landscape architect, or geoscientist. Subd. 5. Insurance companies; rating bureaus. The provisions of sections 326.02 to 326.15 shall not apply to inspection and service work done by employees of insurance companies, their agents, or insurance rating bureaus. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Final Rules March. 19, 2008 treated, through onsite or offsite detention, to at least sixty percent (60 %) annual removal efficiency for phosphorus, and at least ninety percent (90 %) annual removal efficiency for to_ tal suspended solids. The onsite retention of runoff may be included in demonstrating compliance with the.total suspended solids and phosphorus removal requirements.. 4.3.2 Low floor elevation No structure may be constructed or reconstructed such that its lowest floor elevation-is less than 2 feet above the 100 -year event flood elevation. a All structures riparian to inundation areas or constructed or natural stormwater management facilities must be. located and elevations must be set according to Appendix 4a, "Suggested Low Floor Guidance." b Landlocked basins. Any new or reconstructed structure wholly or partially within a landlocked basin must be constructed such that its lowest floor elevation is: 1 1 ft above the surface overflow of the basin, or 2 2 ft above the elevation resulting from two concurrent 100 - year single rainfall events in a 24 -hour period or a 100 - year, 10 -day snowmelt, whichever is higher. 3 The starting elevation of the basin prior to the runoff event shall be established by one of the following: A Existing ordinary high water elevation established by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources; B Annual water balance calculation approved by the District; C Local observation well records, as approved by the District; or D Mottled soil. 4.3.3 Maintenance All stormwater management structures and facilities must be designed for maintenance access and properly maintained in perpetuity to assure that they continue. to function as designed. Permit applicants must provide a maintenance plan that identifies and protects the design, capacity and functionality of onsite and offsite stormwater management facilities; specifies the methods, schedule and responsible parties for maintenance; provides for the 24 �r IT 1:� J i field failure due to an )il. North Carolina. -d of carbonates, reducing the ached C horizon material. The oil reconnaissance and may be 1: 10 with water —when drops per, soil containing carbonates ments such as glacial till and ;h was their color when depos- )on exposure to air or oxygen - or brown. The occurrence of :ig therefore does not necessar- t only a penetration below the materials may be observed to ninutes after exposure to air. : of weathering may be highly sither to continuous saturation impermeability of the deposit. COLOR neans for identification of soils The color by which a soil is 2.3. COLOR STANDARDS 17 < designated should be that which it has when moist and in its natural state. The color designation of a stratum should give the range of color included, k such as black to dark brown or dark brown to reddish brown. In using such compound terms as grayish brown or pinkish gray, the adjective is recog- nized as the modifying term. Thus, a grayish -brown soil is a brown soil with a grayish cast sufficiently noticeable to require recognition; a pinkish -gray soil is a gray soil with a pinkish cast. A soil that has spots, streaks, or splotches of one or more colors against a background of another predominant color is called a mottled soil. For example, a soil may be described as "olive gray, mottled with brown." In a mottled soil the colors are not mixed and blended, but each color is more or less distinct in relation to the general background color. When two or more `l distinct colors occur mixed throughout the mass in approximately equal _ amounts, the soil is said to be marbled. In a marbled soil there is not a general or predominant background color, as in the case of a mottled soil. The terms _ spotted, speckled, streaked, or variegated may be used in a soil designation when the generally accepted meaning of the term clearly describes the color distributions that occur in the soil. 2.3. COLOR STANDARDS The U.S. Department of Agriculture uses the Munsell color chart in pedolog- ical soil -survey operations. In this system colors are designated by the fol- lowing three variables: hue, value, and chroma. Hue is the dominant spectral or rainbow color. Value refers to the relative lightness or darkness of color. Chroma, sometimes called saturation, is the relative purity or strength of the hue; it increases with decreasing grayness. The relation among hue, value, and chroma is illustrated in Fig. 2.3. In the Munsell notation of color, each of the three components —hue, value, and chroma —is measured on a scale from 0 to 10. For example, in the notation for value the number 0 stands for absolute black, and 10 stands for absolute white. A color to which the number 5 is assigned is visually midway between these extremes. An example of the Munsell notation is "5YR 4/4." This means a yellowish -red soil of hue 5 for which the value is 4 and the chroma is 4. Soil colors are most conveniently and accurately determined by com- panson with a color chart. The chart used by the U.S.D.A. consists of 175 colored cards or chips systematically arranged by hue, value, and chroma and marked by their Munsell notations. As a rule, engineering usage does not require that the soil color be determined with the degree of refinement which is possible by means of the U.S.D.A. chart. Ordinarily, an engineering orga- nization supplies each of its soil- survey parties with a smaller number of color cards, say 12 to 24. The actual number depends on the range of soil colors encountered in the state or region in which the work is being done. These cards, however, should match with selected colors on the U.S.D.A. chart, in order that a satisfactory degree of uniformity in color terminology f 41 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Connie Carrino <CRCarrino @msn.com> Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 11:19 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Attachments: City Council Follow -up Nov 2010.doc Importance: High Hi Jackie- Can you please include this email with the attachment in the City Council packets for the Dec. 21 meeting? TO: Edina City Council As you are preparing for the second reading of Ordinance 2010 -17, we ask you to please pause and reconsider. No doubt by now you understand our situation and position —we have written several letters and emails, attended more than 12 meetings and work sessions, met with you individually and commented at Planning Commission and City Council meetings. Neighbors and Edina residents —many experts /professionals in architecture, building industry, real estate, construction law —have also written to you and the Planning Commission and requested that you find a solution other than the proposed CUP. And just so it is submitted as an official document for consideration, we are attaching our letter sent to you individually on November 28. We ask that you reconsider and think back to where this started nearly six months ago... Earlier this summer we were just days away from finalizing the paperwork for a variance for our house project when the City of Edina Planning department informed us that because of the Minnesota Supreme Court ruling they could not process variance applications. We were told, however, that the City Council was looking into options. It was at a work session this summer that the Council set a goal to find solutions: To find "tools in the toolbox" to help homeowners, to develop other tools because "as an older community we need to evolve, and move forward because "we would do our community a disservice if we wait..." Clearly the goal of the City Council was to find a workable solution. The one you are considering is not workable, it is not a constructive tool but an obstacle to progress, and is a disservice to this community. After reviewing the six variances approved for the 1' height restriction, we now realize we probably most likely were over - preparing for the variance process —those variances were approved with far less structural problems (only one had water problems), lot constraints, and irregular building challenges than we have encountered. Clearly, if those were approved our request would have been approved. Can you imagine how frustrated and disappointed we are to realize that it was only a matter of a few days between having our project approved and now months later, the proposed ordinance you are considering could stop. us and force us to live with what used to qualify as "undue hardship "? It is simply unimaginable that the solution you are considering could make our situation go from bad to worse. 1 We have already been punished by this delay. The time lost has cost us money in lost incentives and rising mortgage rates (up .75% since we were pre - approved; financial analysts are projecting 20% increase before we could potentially begin our project). Please don't punish us and other Edina residents further with longer delays or moving forward with a CUP language that is more restrictive than the already stringent Edina City Code. Please reconsider this direction. Thank you. Jeff Miller & Connie Carrino Miller— Carrina 4509 Garrison Lane ® E_Jina, MN 55424 ® 952.926.4839 November 28, 2010 Dear: Once again, we would like to thank you for your efforts to help find a reasonable solution regarding our stalled home building project. During this interim time before the next Council meeting on December 7 and as you are considering revisions to the proposed Conditional Use Permit (CUP) language, we ask that you consider the following points and suggestions. Yes, we have presented some of these points previously, but there are a few additional considerations as well. Provision 2 and 3 – Please Edit Although we believe you understand our position and issues with our project, we feel compelled to stress again that the language in Provision 2 and 3 will not necessarily help us and could actually prevent us from moving forward. Why? Consider... Provision 2 would require us to FIRST conduct extensive and expensive testing— testing that may need to be performed over several seasons with EACH test period adding more cost; testing that was not required for the variance process or prior to 2008 when the code in question was enacted; testing costs that we believe are punitive in that they add more money to the costs we have previously incurred to deal with water issues that we want to resolve in going to the extent of building a new home. Some argue that any homeowner with water issues should do these tests. We believe that any homeowner who only suspects they have water issues may want to do these tests. We already know we have water issues. We wonder why we should be penalized for wanting to do the right thing and make the necessary corrections? It is one thing to look at the soil and it is quite another to be required to prove a water problem that we have lived with for several years. We believe this is not only restrictive, but legal over -reach coupled with some of the strictest residential zoning requirements in the state. In addition, we could conduct the tests and depending upon the season, they might not provide enough proof to the problem we know we have. Yet we know from experience and weather projections that the pond will rise to a level that will force the ground water to rise to levels that even the best drainage tile and sump pump system may not be able to control. We've been told that at one point the homes on Nancy Lake were in the FEMA flood plain. At some point, however, that was changed and we believe that is part of the problem with our lot. Although the designation changed, we believe the water issues did not as indicated by our ongoing issues. We think it would be wise for the City of Edina to address lots on lakes and ponds with code language that addresses these special circumstances. Where building codes have been made stricter to protect the Country Club, South Harriett Park and other charming older neighborhoods, we believe building codes need to also protect and address projects in neighborhoods that present other challenges such as water or soil hazards. Keep in mind, there are other zoning codes that protect regrading, runoff, overall height, and other issues that drove the first floor height restriction. Some potential language suggestions for Provision 2: "For homes that are located on lake or pond lots, or that have experienced ground water or surface water problems, or where soil or water conditions prohibit digging the foundation deeper, the first floor elevation may be increased to the extent necessary to protect the structural integrity of the new home but not more than 4 -feet higher than the existing first floor elevation. Determinations of these conditions can be substantiated with historical data, or professional surveys, or hydrologic or hydraulic engineering evaluations or tests." Regarding Provision 3... Language in Provision 3 is erroneous because it does not correct structural building problems such as 7' or lower ceilings, or the differences in depth /width of the new. building materials such as new joist or truss systems from materials used in previous decades. Yes, we understand there may be some building code issues that can be brought current, but Minnesota building code sets the MINIMAL standards and requirements needed for building a home —let's call it grade "C." To bring a house to the "A" level for safety, moisture intrusion, green building and just updated, common building practices requires going beyond the minimal standards set in the state building code. Language in the CUP does not remedy these important factors. Some argue that we would have another opportunity— another portal —to get us "into the CUP door" with the language in Provision 3. Yet, after reviewing the Minnesota building code (International Residential Code) and Edina Code, there is nothing we can use to make our case for 8' high ceilings. Seven -foot ceilings, however, are not only out -dated and inefficient, but entirely impractical and a waste of space and, therefore, money. Just looking at the data from our builder, they have not built ANY new homes in the last two decades with less than 8' ceilings. Between 2000 and 2010, 75 percent of the new homes they built had 9' ceilings. Yet, we are struggling to get approval for a lower level with 8' high ceilings that will house prime living space of at least 1,000 square feet of taxable space for two bedrooms and a family room. And, quite frankly, 8' OR HIGHER ceilings should be encouraged in homes that are trying to efficiently maximize lower level living space without adding another story to the overall height. Perhaps special language could be developed to address walkout ramblers We really are baffled why Edina is so concerned about the height of our lowest level, which in our case is prime living space. Yes, some people want 10' ceilings on their first floor (which may be above or below grade). Since there are codes that protect overall height, grading or runoff to neighbors, we just don't understand why there is such opposition to how we determine ceiling height for the walkout level. We've heard the examples of how the code was changed to protect some neighborhoods where five or so homes were built with raised first floors /thresholds. What may seem like a fair justification for those scenarios is now incredibly unfair to us and others in similar building situations as proven by the six previous variances issued and now our stalled project. Some potential language suggestions for Provision 3: "The first floor elevation may be increased to the extent necessary to allow the new building to meet State building Code, City of Edina Code, other statutory requirements, to increase sub - standard ceiling heights to 8 -feet, and /or to use updated and current building materials; and" The Character Debate vs. Structural Integrity We'd like to suggest that you focus less on the issues surrounding the highly subjective character of the neighborhood and more on the structural integrity of new building. Where character deals with how a neighborhood looks, integrity is far more important in that it has everything to do with the safety, security and sustainability of the home's foundation. As an older suburb, Edina needs to ensure that it maintains sound, modern building practices, not just maintain character. During the last City Council meeting, the term "squishy" was used during the discussion surrounding character of the neighborhood. That term is spot -on: Character is squishy. just as it is difficult to legislate morality so, too, is it equally difficult to control what defines character. Yet, the code giving us angst is jeopardizing the building structure of our new home. That is and should not be squishy. Section H. of Edina Code 850.11 jeopardizes the structural integrity of the new home we wish to build and the CUP will not help us present our case against that code. We urge you to consider a new approach, new language or,a new tool that considers character but that also allows us to improve building integrity by correcting the foundation and structural problems of our 1959 house with new, green, sustainable, 2010, and "A" level building materials, standards and practices. Frustration Overload We'd,like'to point out, again, that our frustration is not with people, but with process. Our frustration started in"December of 2007 when the first floor height restriction was approved thus forcing us into the variance process. Then, once we got;our project back on track and were ready to submit the variance application, the Krummenacher ruling is issued. Because we were unable to start the project as planned, we have lost Parade of Homes incentives. We wasted a lot of time trying to avoid the variance process and then once that was inevitable, making sure we had all the right documentation to meet the guidelines. Now, the proposed CUP adds to the frustration in that it would require rigid documentation that we may not have, expensive testing that may not be helpful-to our case, take more time and cost more money to process. From where we stand, the process has gone from bad to worse. As proposed, the CUP does not complement the suggestion of the League of Minnesota Cities to build more flexibility into zoning code issues. New Consideration - VIP Finally, if the CUP is the only option and tool available to residents, PLEASE consider changing the language and requirements in the CUP application regarding notification distance. Current variance application requires 200 feet: the CUP requires 1.000 feet. The residential CUP has primarily been used for commercial -like properties in the R1 district such as churches and schools. We can certainly understand why 1,000 feet would and should be required for those types of situations. In our case, however, notifying property owners within 1,000 feet would include homes several blocks way: On Ashcroft where they can't see our propert y nor would they ever drive by; apartment building owners or businesses on Valleyview (why would Snuffy's burger joint care about our project ?); or the south end of Brookview where biases against any new building loom large and, again, they would nevereven "drive by our property. This extensive. notification is only inviting problems from the trouble- making Krummenachers living in every city. In closing, we'd simply like to state that although the language as currently proposed will not help our stalled home building project, we trust and are hopeful you will make reasonable changes before. a second reading is approved. We truly are appreciative of your time and efforts. Best regards, Jeff Miller and Connie Carrino Neighborhood Letter of Concern and Support December 17, 2010 Dear City Council Members: We understand you will have the second reading for the proposed Ordinance 2010 -17 at your next meeting on Tue., Dec. 12. We have been following this issue because Jeff Miller and Connie Carrino had previously discussed their teardown plans with us and we learned it has been put on hold due to a City code /ordinance that requires a variance. We remain in support of their project and we encourage the City Council to revise the ordinance in a way that builds flexibility and does not force responsible homeowners into such a quandary. We have reviewed the proposed Conditional Use Permit language and are not supportive of Provisions 2 and 3. The CUP as drafted will not help Jeff Miller and Connie Cairino and, therefore, they would not move forward with their project. That would be a real shame and loss to the neighborhood. We'd like to see their proposed new, improved walkout rambler built on Garrison Lane. Instead of the CUP you have drafted, please consider the following: - Instead of the Conditional Use Permit, change the original code /ordinance to allow more flexibility as suggested by the League of Minnesota Cities and proposed by Cary Teague in his draft language of September 2. We believe this was initially considered and somehow was not explored completely. - We do not agree with the direction you have taken. The language proposed in the Conditional Use Permit was not required in the former variance process. This —the CUP —seems to be penalizing property owners rather than moving forward with a fair solution. - If a Conditional Use Permit is the only solution you are willing to consider, please delete the highly over - regulated requirement of insisting upon a hydrologic study. Perhaps that can be an option for property owners who only suspect they have a problem, but we do not believe the City should require all property owners — especially those who have been living with water problems —to endure more expense, frustration and delays. - The one -foot restriction is unrealistic for property owners wanting to rebuild who have low ceilings such as 7 -foot or lower. Twelve inches does not allow for more habitable 8- foot ceilings AND the extra space needed to update building materials. - Finally, if the proposed CUP is the only option you will consider, please change the notification distance from 1,000 feet to 200 as was required in the variance application. Respectfully submitted for your consideration, (see attachment for signatures) Name (Print) Street Address ¢ Phone 19 ionntnrp 1 ,w5cm - - F'. Wj s: • l A ii�d FOR.," 00- PI 5 - �O' I mf �, MA f 04 MI... 6 M�M�Mavl Pat Lff� .� LM fill r go M.- 1 - WNW IN MA-W�M PEA u,, ,� RA� % j 1 Lme (Print) Street Address Phone Sign ar . „, u F—, mppl: g r - 1, mr,,.! I W.-: &; 7, P-� .• u,. r or df Ira �� • i low IWO '!� , I �� i tl'�1 /L•% /tom' / /il�� i u Neighborhood Letter of Concern and Support December 17, 2010 Dear City Council Members: We understand you will have the second reading for the proposed Ordinance 2010 -17 at your next meeting on Tue., Dec. 12. We have been following this issue because Jeff Miller and Connie Carrino had previously discussed their teardown plans with us and we learned it has been put on hold due to a City code /ordinance that requires a variance. We remain in support of their project and we encourage the City Council to revise the ordinance in a way that builds flexibility and does not force responsible homeowners into such a quandary. We have reviewed the proposed Conditional Use Permit language and are not supportive of Provisions 2 and 3. The CUP as drafted will not help Jeff Miller and Connie Carrino and, therefore, they would not move forward with their project. That would be a real shame and loss to the neighborhood. We'd like to see their proposed new, improved walkout rambler built on Garrison Lane. Instead of the CUP you have drafted, please consider the following: - Instead of the Conditional Use Permit, change the original code /ordinance to allow more flexibility as suggested by the League of Minnesota Cities and proposed by Cary Teague in his draft language of September 2. We believe this was initially considered and somehow was not explored completely. - We do not agree with the direction you have taken. The language proposed in the Conditional Use Permit was not required in the former variance process. This —the CUP —seems to be penalizing property owners rather than moving forward with a fair solution. - If a Conditional Use Permit is the only solution you are willing to consider, please delete the highly over - regulated requirement of insisting upon a hydrologic study. Perhaps that can be an option for property owners who only suspect they have a problem, but we do not believe the City should require all property owners — especially those who have been living with water problems —to endure more expense, frustration and delays. - The one -foot restriction is unrealistic for property owners wanting to rebuild who have low ceilings such as 7 -foot or lower. Twelve inches does not allow for more habitable 8 -foot ceilings AND the extra space needed to update building materials. - Finally, if the proposed CUP is the only option you will consider, please change the notification distance from 1,000 feet to 200 as was required in the variance application. Respectfully submitted for your consideration, aL;.,i,7be gIv7044-0r-4 _ Jr.4.4 Q,., 00 :.r.e -.a Neighborhood Letter of Concern and Support December 17, 2010 Dear City Council Members: We understand you will have the second reading for the proposed Ordinance 2010 -17 at your next meeting on Tue., Dec. 12. We have been following this issue because Jeff Miller and Connie Camino had previously discussed their teardown plans with us and we learned it has been put on hold due to a City code/ordinance that requires a variance. We remain in support of their project and we encourage the City Council to revise the ordinance in a way that builds flexibility and does not force responsible homeowners into such a quandary. We have reviewed the proposed Conditional Use Permit language and are not supportive of Provisions 2 and 3. The CUP as drafted will not help Jeff Miller and Connie Camino and, therefore, they would not move forward with their project. That would be a real shame and loss to the neighborhood We'd like to see their proposed new, improved walkout rambler built on Garrison Lane. Instead of the CUP you have drafted, please consider the following: - Instead of the Conditional Use Permit, change the original code /ordinance to allow more flexibility as suggested by the League of Minnesota Cities and proposed by Cary Teague in his draft language of September 2. We believe this was initially considered and somehow was not explored completely. - We do not agree with the direction you have taken. The language proposed in the Conditional Use Permit was not required in the former variance process. This —the CUP —seems to be penalizing property owners rather than moving forward with a fair solution. - If a Conditional Use Permit is the only solution you are willing to consider, please delete the highly over - regulated requirement of insisting upon a hydrologic study. Perhaps that can be an option for property owners who only suspect they have a problem, but we do not believe the City should require all property owners—especially those who have been living with water problems —to endure more expense, frustration and delays. - The one -foot restriction is unrealistic for property owners wanting to rebuild who have low ceilings such as 7 -foot or lower. Twelve inches does not allow for more habitable 8- foot ceilings AND the extra space needed to update building materials. - Finally, if the proposed CUP is the only option you will consider, please change the notification distance from 1,000 feet to 200 as was required in the variance application. Respectfully submitted for your consideration, Mike and Lisa Lynch 6113 Ashcroft Ave Edina, MN 55424 J ('0I l [.(if CITY COLLEGE CITY DESIGN BUILD, INC. 7910 Lakeville Blvd Lakeville MN 55044 CITY OF EDINA Cary Teague, City Planner 12/16/2010 RE: 4509 GARRISON LANE — Miller — Carrino Residence Tear Down & Re -Build Custom Home Dear Mr. Teague, I am submitting this letter in support of, and on behalf of our clients — Edina Resldents —Jeff Miller and Connie Carrino in their efforts to positively impact City decision making and provide good solutions for many of your residents.. As a custom builder and remodeler engaged in, and committed to, building Jeff and Connie a safe, sustainable home and providing long term value, we submit to you the following facts and remarks for consideration: 1) The high ground water level on their lot, non optimal grade / slope away from back of home, and past history of the basement flooding leads us to recommend we should elevate lowest floor by 1' in the new build. 2) Their current homes 7' ceiling is not acceptable and does not follow current building practices therefore we recommend going to a 8' ceiling height (9' is a commonly used Building standard today as evidenced by the 325+ Parade Models In the BATC Fall Parade Of Homes Tour) 3) Current Building Practices and the above point 8' proposed Basement Ceiling Height strongly suggests and we recommend the use of 16" Floor Truss System in the new build (6" increase over their current 2 "X10" floor joist system) In order to house ductwork in truss rather than dropping below 8' as would be the case with a 2 "X10" floor system. In light of above observations, remarks, and recommendations we have now effectively raised the first floor height from their existing residence by 2'60, which is exactly 1'6" over the currently allowed increase of 1'. Sincerely -- Darin Pavek, President -CGP Steve McDonald, Construction Mgr -CGP Bjorn Freudenthal, VP Sales & Mktg -CAPS College City Design - Build, Inc. 7910 Lakeville Blvd. Lakeville, MN 55044 Phone: (952) 469 -6900 Fax: (952) 469-6910 LIC 1120431713 ti.r 4 A ZN ka(01 m REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.G. From: Cary Teague Planning Director ® Action ❑ Discussion 0 Information Date: December 21, 2010 Subject: Second Reading: Ordinance No. And Procedures Of The Zoning District 2010 -18 - Regarding Administration Ordinance And Establishing A PUD ACTION REQUESTED: Approve second reading of Ordinance 2010 -18, subject to any revisions required by the City Council. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached is Ordinance 2010 -18, which has been revised to include revisions recommended by the City Council (new text is in blue) at the November 16, 2010 meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance 2010 -18 Planning Commission staff report. Minutes tU9tN�1rrL o e 0 �v � �y PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague September 29, 2010 2009.0004.10 Director of Planning (Zoning Ordinance Amendments) INFORMATION /BACKGROUND Before the Planning Commission are three Zoning Ordinance Amendments that have been studied by the Commission over the past year as part of the Zoning Ordinance Update. The three amendments are as follows: 1. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Zoning District; 2. Non - Conforming Use /Alternative Setback Standard Ordinance; and 3. Driveway Width. In addition to the attached background information on each of the three topics; the following provides some additional information and summary of each ordinance. Planned Unit Development (PUD) The attached ordinance proposing a PUD is the result of numerous meetings and discussions held by the Planning Commission. (See attached information and minutes from previous meetings and work sessions.) The Commission is now asked to consider how the ordinance would fit into the overall Zoning Ordinance. The attached ordinance amendment is for Section 850.04, which is the entire Section of the ordinance regarding administration and procedures for variances and appeals, rezoning, transfer to planned districts (final development plans) and conditional use permits. The major change to the section of the code would be the creation of a PUD zoning district. As previously discussed, there are two primary benefits to a PUD: 5. Amends submittal requirements. 6. Establishes the PUD District as previously recommended. 7. Suggests new CUP standards as recommended by the City Attorney. B. Eliminates temporary CUP's which are not legal. Non - Conforming Use /Alternative Setback Standard Ordinance A recent Minnesota Supreme Court ruling has rejected a 20 year old ruling regarding the meaning of "undue hardship" in regard to review of variances. In light of this ruling, many Cities, including Edina, are considering the attached Ordinance Amendment to allow expansion of non - conforming structures to match existing non - conforming setbacks, rather than grant variances, which has typically been the standard in Edina before this ruling. The previous ruling of "undue hardship" meant that cities could determine if the ordinance prevented a "reasonable use "of property. Cities had some discretion to determine if a use requiring a variance was reasonable. The new ruling holds that a variance cannot be approved unless the ordinance prevents all reasonable use of the property. Therefore, if a homeowner wanted to build an addition to.their home that did not meet all ordinance requirements, a variance would not be possible, as he /she would already have reasonable use of the property, a single - family home. This is a major change in the criteria for granting a variance. Edina's Variance Histo In drafting the ordinance, staff researched variances that have been granted in the past. See attached reports dated September 1 and 29, regarding recent variance history. The September 1, 2010 report points out that over the past three plus years, 154 single - family home residential variance requests were made. Nearly half of those were for expansions to homes that had non- conforming setbacks. Expansions to these structures to match the existing non- conforming setback are typically approved. The September 29, 2010 report was requested by the Planning Commission at the "open house" on September 15. It examines the size of structures within non- conforming setbacks. The results of the report are the basis for the 200 square foot maximum encroachment suggested. 3 considered in driveway width; should there be an impervious surface requirement; what is the definition of a driveway; and would a maximum width requirement create non - conforming driveways? Currently, there is no maximum driveway width requirement for residential driveways in the City of Edina. Staff is not aware of any complaints or issues in the past regarding this regulation. Staff is concerned about establishing a requirement that would create non - conforming uses, and create a demand for variances. If a maximum width. requirement is desired, the issues raised could be further studied as part of other amendments currently being worked on, including impervious surface and lot coverage requirements. In summary the proposed ordinance would: 1. Eliminate the minimum driveway width requirement in the R -1 and R -2 Zoning Districts. 2. Allows pervious pavers as an acceptable driveway material. Recommendation /Conclusion Staff recommends approval of the attached ordinances subject to any additions or amendments recommended by the Commission. 5 ORDINANCE NO. 2010-18 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING ORDINANCE CONCERNING ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURES AND ESTABLISHING A PUD DISTRICT The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Subsection 850.04 is amended to read: 850.04 Administration and Procedures for Variances and Appeals, Rezoning, Site Plan Review, and Conditional Use Permits. Subd. 1� Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 15.99, applications shall be approved or denied within sixty (60) days from the date of its official and complete submission unless extended by the City pursuant to statute or a time waiver is granted by the applicant.. Subd. 4 2 Variances and Appeals. A. Zoning Board of Appeals. There is continued a separate Zoning Board of Appeals of the City. The Zoning Board of Appeals is the board of appeals and adjustments created pursuant to M.S. 462.354, Subd. 2. All members of the Commission, from time to time, shall be members, and the other members shall be six residents of the City appointed for a term of three years by the Mayor with the consent of a majority of the members of the Council. For hearings, the Board shall consist, at a maximum, of any five members, but three members shall constitute a quorum for conducting such hearings and making decisions. However, at least one Commission member shall be in attendance at each Board meeting, and shall be deemed to be the representative of the Commission for purposes of review and report by the Commission as required by M.S. 462.354, Subd. 2. The Board shall make no decision until the Commission, or a representative of it, has had reasonable opportunity, not to exceed 60 days, to review and report to the Board concerning the decision. All members shall serve without compensation. Members may resign voluntarily or be removed by a majority vote of the Council or pursuant to Existing text - XXXX Stricken text —X Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX Section 180 of this Code. That Commission member in attendance at a meeting who has the then longest continuous service on the Commission shall be the Chair for that meeting. The Board shall adopt such bylaws as shall be necessary or desirable for conduct of its business. Staff services shall be provided by the Planning Department. Board members who discontinue legal residency in the City shall be automatically removed from office effective as of the date of such discontinuance. Vacancies shall be filed pursuant to Subsection .180.03 of this Code. B. Powers and Duties of Board. The Board shall have the power and duty of hearing and deciding, subject to appeal to the Council, the following matters: 1. Requests for variances from the literal provisions of this Section; 2. Appeals in which it is alleged that there is an error in any order, requirement, decision or determination made by an administrative officer in the interpretation or enforcement of this Section; 3. Requests for variances from the literal provisions of Section 1046 of this Code; 4. Requests for modifications from the requirements of Section 815 of this Code; and 6. If a variance request is part of another land use application, including but not limited to a conditional use permit, rezoning, and preliminary or final site plan, the decision by the Zoning Poard of Appeals is automatically appealed to the City Council: The City Council would then take official action on the,' applications including the variance. If a variance request is made along with a certificate of appropriateness for the Heritage Preservation Board, the Zoning Board of Appeals decision is not automatically appealed. Final decision of the Board of Appeals would stand unless appealed by the applicant or another impacted individual. C. Petitions for Variances. The owner or owners of land to which the variance relates may file a petition for a variance with the Planning Department. The petition shall be made on forms provided by the Planning Department and shall be accompanied by the fee set forth in Section 185 of this Code. The petition shall be accompanied by plans and drawings to scale which clearly illustrate, to the satisfaction of the Planner, the improvements to be Existing text - XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX N made if the variance is granted. The Planner may require the petitioner to submit a certificate by a registered professional land surveyor verifying the location of all buildings, setbacks and building coverage, and certifying other facts that in the opinion of the Planner are necessary for evaluation of the petition. D. Appeals of Administrative Decisions. A person who deems himself or herself aggrieved by an alleged error in any order, requirement, decision or determination made by an administrative officer in the interpretation and enforcement of this Section, may appeal to the Board by filing a written appeal with the Planning Department within thirty (30) days after the date of such order, requirement, decision or determination. The appeal shall fully state the order to be appealed and the relevant facts of the matter. E. Hearing and Decision by the Board; Notice. 12. Notice of variance hearings shall be mailed not less than ten (10) days before the date of the hearing to the person who filed the petition for variance and to each owner of property situated wholly or partially within two hundred (200) feet of the property to which the variance relates insofar as the names and addresses of such owners can be reasonably determined by the Clerk from records maintained by the Assessor. 23. A notice of hearing for appeals of administrative decisions shall be published in the official newspaper of the City not less than ten (10) days before the hearing. A notice shall also be mailed to the appellant. 34. No new notice need be given for any hearing which is continued by the Board to a specified future date. F. Findings for Variances. The Board shall not grant a petition for a variance unless it finds that the strict enforcement of this Section would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the petitioner's property and that the grant of said variance is in keeping with the spirit and Existing text - XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX - - 12. Notice of variance hearings shall be mailed not less than ten (10) days before the date of the hearing to the person who filed the petition for variance and to each owner of property situated wholly or partially within two hundred (200) feet of the property to which the variance relates insofar as the names and addresses of such owners can be reasonably determined by the Clerk from records maintained by the Assessor. 23. A notice of hearing for appeals of administrative decisions shall be published in the official newspaper of the City not less than ten (10) days before the hearing. A notice shall also be mailed to the appellant. 34. No new notice need be given for any hearing which is continued by the Board to a specified future date. F. Findings for Variances. The Board shall not grant a petition for a variance unless it finds that the strict enforcement of this Section would cause undue hardship because of circumstances unique to the petitioner's property and that the grant of said variance is in keeping with the spirit and Existing text - XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX intent of this Section. "Undue hardship" means that (i) the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use as allowed by this Section; (ii) the plight of the petitioner is due to circumstances unique to the petitioner's property which were not created by the petitioner; and (iii) the variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the property or its surroundings. Economic considerations alone shall not constitute an undue hardship if reasonable use for the petitioner's property exists under the terms of this Section. A favorable vote by the Board shall be deemed to include a favorable finding on each of the foregoing matters even if not specifically set out in the approval resolution or the minutes of the Board meeting. G. Appeals from Decisions of the Board. 1. The following individuals may appeal a decision of the Board: a. any petitioner for a variance; b. any owner to whom notice of the variance hearing is required to be mailed pursuant to this Section; c. the appellant in the case of an appeal of an administrative decision; d. any person who deems to be aggrieved by the Board's decision on the appeal of an administrative decision; and e. any administrative officer of the City; 2. An appeal from a decision of the Board shall be filed with the Clerk no later than ten (10) days after the decision by the Board. If not so filed, the right of appeal shall be deemed waived, and the decision of the Board shall be final. H. Hearing and Decision by Council. The Council shall hear and decide all appeals from the decisions of the Board, and variances associated with other land use applications. The An appeal shall be heard not later than sixty (60) days after the date the appeal is filed. The Council shall follow the same procedures as to notices, hearings, findings for variances and decisions that the Board is required to follow relative to the subject matter of the appeal pursuant to this Section. A favorable vote by the Council shall be deemed to include a favorable finding on each of the required findings even if not specifically set out in the approval resolution or the minutes of the Council meeting. Existing text - XXXX 4 Stricken text —XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX I. Conditions on Variance Approvals. In granting a variance, the Board, or the Council on appeal, may impose conditions to ensure compliance with the purpose and intent of this Code and to protect adjacent properties. J. Form of Action Taken and Record. The Board, or the Council on appeal, shall maintain a record of its proceedings which shall include the minutes of its meetings and final order concerning the variance petition or appeal of administrative decision. If a variance is granted, the petitioner, at the petitioner's expense, shall duly record the final order in the proper office to give constructive notice. A verified copy of such order, with the recording data, shall be delivered to the Planner. The Board, or the Council on appeal, may require such order to be recorded and such verified copy to be delivered to the Planner before the variance shall be effective. K. Lapse of Variance by Non -User; Extension of Time. 1. If, within one (1) year after the date of the meeting of the Board, or the Council on appeal, at which the variance was granted, the owner or occupant of the affected land shall not have obtained a building permit, if one is required, and commenced the work or improvement described in such petition, the variance shall become null and void unless a petition for extension of time in which to commence the proposed work or improvement has been granted. 2. A petition for extension shall be in writing and filed with the Clerk within such one (1) year period. The petition for extension shall state facts showing a good faith attempt to use the variance and shall state the additional time requested to begin the proposed work or improvement. The petition shall be presented to the Board for hearing, findings and decision in the same manner as then required by this Section 850 for an original petition for variance. The Board may grant an extension of the variance for up to one (1) year upon finding that a good faith attempt to use the variance has been made, that there is a reasonable expectation that the variance will be used during the extension, that speculation will thereby not be fostered, and that the facts and circumstances under which the original variance was granted are not materially changed. L. Denial. No application for a variance which has been denied in whole or in part shall be resubmitted within twelve (12) months of the date of the order of denial, except that a new application may be permitted to the same denying board, if new evidence or a change of circumstances warrant it. Existing text - XXXX Stricken text —X Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX W Subd. 3 TFansfeF to Planned Dastdrts. Site Plan Review. Existing text - XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading -.XXXX f.Wr-r. EMIK 3. _ . _ - - - ■ N 5m rim . •_. MMIMMM21=1% ME . M MEW=. - 0 M-41M. Mr. - - - - _ .. - Existing text - XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading -.XXXX f.Wr-r. EMIK 3. _ . _ - - - . •_. Existing text - XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading -.XXXX A. Purpose. The purpose of this Section is to establish a formal site_ plan review procedure and provide regulations pertaining to ensure', compliance with the site design standards imposed by Sections 460 and -- 850 of the City_Code! B. Approval Require Without first obtaining site plan approval it shall be' ;unlawful to do any of the followin gr Construct a new building or add on to an existing building that would � more than ten increase in gross 0 floor area of all buildings on the lot by - - - - - - - -- P ercent - -- _ _� _ 0%);j 2.Move a building to any lot within the City;j 3. - Expand or change the use of a building or parcel of land or modify, a building, accessory structure or site or land feature in any manner Which results in a different intensity of use, including the,' iirequirement for additional parking; 4. Grade or take other actions to prepare a site for development, except in conformance with a permit or an approved plan; and 5. earth, Remove h same on asitel e gravel ept in conformance natural material lace permi on' or a � approved plan.' C. Exceptions. Except in those cases specifically cited within this Title,_the following shall be exempt from the foregoing requirements of this -- - - -- Chapter:j 1. Construction or alteration of a sin_ g le family or two - family residential building or_accessory building ;f Existing text - XXXX 7 Stricken text — X Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX � s ■- - - M .1 le lv� IMMWIMS s ■ ICU A. Purpose. The purpose of this Section is to establish a formal site_ plan review procedure and provide regulations pertaining to ensure', compliance with the site design standards imposed by Sections 460 and -- 850 of the City_Code! B. Approval Require Without first obtaining site plan approval it shall be' ;unlawful to do any of the followin gr Construct a new building or add on to an existing building that would � more than ten increase in gross 0 floor area of all buildings on the lot by - - - - - - - -- P ercent - -- _ _� _ 0%);j 2.Move a building to any lot within the City;j 3. - Expand or change the use of a building or parcel of land or modify, a building, accessory structure or site or land feature in any manner Which results in a different intensity of use, including the,' iirequirement for additional parking; 4. Grade or take other actions to prepare a site for development, except in conformance with a permit or an approved plan; and 5. earth, Remove h same on asitel e gravel ept in conformance natural material lace permi on' or a � approved plan.' C. Exceptions. Except in those cases specifically cited within this Title,_the following shall be exempt from the foregoing requirements of this -- - - -- Chapter:j 1. Construction or alteration of a sin_ g le family or two - family residential building or_accessory building ;f Existing text - XXXX 7 Stricken text — X Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 2 Enlargement building e percent gross fi oora ea, providedthat here s no varian ein olved and also - provided that the Planner has conducted an administrative review pursuant to Section 850 of this Ordinance; and 3. Changes in the leasable space of a multi- tenant building where the, ;change does not intensify the use, require additional parking, or result in an inability to maintain required performance standards as specified in Section 850 of this Ordinance . D. _ Nei hborhood Meeting. Applicants are encouraged to hold a _ neighborhood meeting with nearby residents and landowners prior to,: filing of a formal site plan application! E. Sketch Plan_ I 1. Prior to the formulation of a Site Plan, applicants are encouraged to' present a sketch plan to the Planner prior to filing of a formali application. The plan shall be conceptual but shall be drawn to scale With topography of a contour interval not greater than two (2) feet, and may include the following'. a. the proposed site with reference to existing development,:, topography, and drainage conditions on adjacent properties, at least to within two hundred (200) feet;j b. natural - features;] c. general location of existing and proposed structures includingr rsigns ;, d. tentative access, circulation and street arrangements, both public and e. amenities to be provided such as recreational- areas, open spacer _ -, -- such-as- landscaping, etc-;,Ii - fi. general location of parking areas;i g. proposed public sanitary sewer, water and storm drainage;; Existing text - XXXX 8 Stricken text — X Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX h. a statement showing the proposed density of the project with the method of calculating said density also shown; and L additional information that demonstrates the nature, intent, or, benefit of the proposed development: 2 and CitnCou cal for discussion, review, and informal omment.IAny City , opinions or comments provided to the applicant by the Planner, _ Planning Commission, and City Council shall be considered advisory only and shall not constitute a binding decision on the request There shall be no official application made for a sketch plan. It is-an,, informal review and comment by Planning Commission and City Council. _ _ - comment �F. Procedure; ;1. Filing of Request. Request for site plan approval, as provided within, this Title, shall be filed with the Planner on an official application form. Such application shall be accompanied by a fee as established by City Council resolution. Such application shall also be,__ ;accompanied by detailed written and graphic materials, the number, and size as prescribed by the Planner, fully explaining the proposed change, development, or use. The request shall be considered as ,being officially submitted and complete when the applicant has complied with all specified information requirements. In cases where an application is judged to be incomplete, the Planner shall notify the applicant, in writing,_within fifteen_(15)_days of the date of submission j , 2 Proof of of title thelegaltdescriptionTof the plroperty for which ` p the', , site plan approval is requested, consisting of an abstract of title and s applicable supply documented authorization from the owners) of a the property in question to proceed with the requested site plan a lication 3. Technical Reports. The Planner shall instruct the appropriate staff persons to prepare technical reports where appropriate, and provide' general assistance in conducting an evaluation of the requests 14. Additional Information. City staff shall have the authority to request additional information from the applicant concerning operational Existing text - XXXX 9 Stricken text —X Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX factors or to retain expert assistance with the consent and at the expense of the applicant concerning operational factors. Said information is to be declared necessary to evaluate the request and to establish performance conditions in relation to all pertinent.--- �Sections of this Title. Failure on the part of the applicant to supply all necessary supportive information may be grounds for denial of the; re uestj 5. t t Staff. r representative thereof meet with the Planner and City staff in order top resent, information and answer questions concerning the proposed requests 6. Commission Review and Hearing. The Commission shall conduct a public hearing regarding the site plan. A notice of the date, time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the official` Newspaper of the City at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing. A similar notice of hearing shall be mailed at least ten (10) days before the date of the hearing to each owner of property, situated wholly or partly within one thousand (1,000) feet of the tract to which the petition relates insofar as the names and addresses of such owners can reasonably be determined by the Clerk from; records maintained by the Assessor or from other appropriate; ;records. After reviewing the report of the Planner and hearing the ;oral or written views of all interested persons, the Commission sha_ll make its decision at the same meeting or at a specified future date, and send its recommendation to the Council. No new notice need be given for hearings that are continued by the Commission to a specified future date. The Commission shall recommend approval by the Council upon finding that the proposed development meets the standards of Section 850 of City_Code.� 7. Council Hearing and Decision. The Council shall conduct a public 'hearing on the site plan in the same manner as the Commission 'above. G. Standards. In evaluating a site plan, the Planning Commission and City Council shall consider its compliance with the following' 1 Consistency with the elements and objectives of the City's' development guides, including the Comprehensive Plan and Wa ter Resources Management Plan; and Existing text - XXXX 10 Stricken text —XXXX Added text -XXXX Text added after council first reading - XXXX 2_ Consistency with this Ordinance; K--information Required. The information required for all site plan __ applications consist of the following lowing items, and shall be submitted unless waived by the Planner: 1_ Site boundaries, buildings, structures and other improvements shalt be identified on -site with a current certificate of survey, prepared -and signed by a Minnesota licensed land surveyor, depicting the; #ollowing; - - - -- -- - - - -- -- a. scale of plan (engineering scale only, atone-inch equals fifty feet 50') or less.);l — - -- b. north point indication ;I c. existing boundaries with lot dimension and area;] d. existing -site improvements; e all encroachments;! #._-_easements of record;] g_legal description of the property;_and h. _ponds, lakes, springs, rivers or other waterways bordering on or, running through the subject property 1 2. A site plan utilizing a copy of the current certificate of survey as -a base for the site in question, depicting the followin r a. name and address of developer /owner; b. name and address of arch itectldesigner ; c. date of plan preparation* d. dates and description of all revisions ;; e. name of project or development; and fi. all proposed improvements,- including Existing text - XXXX 11 Stricken text —XXXX Added text —XXXX _ Text added after Council'first reading - XXXX - L required and proposed setbacks; ii. location, setback and dimensions of all proposed buildings and structures,; iii. location of all adjacent buildings located within one hundred (100) feet of the exterior boundaries of the property in' question;; iv. location, number, dimensions, and setbacks of proposed parking spaces and drive aisles;; v. location, number, and dimensions of proposed loading spaces; vi. location, width, and setbacks of all curb cuts and driveways;; vii.vehicular circulation;, viii. sidewalks, walkways, trails; .ix location and type of all proposed lighting, including details of all proposed fixtures,! X. location of recreation and service areas ;. xi. location of rooftop equipment and proposed screening;) xii. provisions for storage and disposal of waste, garbage, and fecyclables, including details for screening exterior, trash /recycling_enclosures; and XI!' location, sizing, ant s and sewer y 'and stem mains proposed service c -- - - - - -- vi on ne t ons -- -- 3. Grading /stormwater drainage plan, utilizing a copy of the current certificate of survey as a base for the site in question, prepared and; signed by a Minnesota licensed - engineer, depicting the following:; intervals (may be prepared by a. existing contours at two 2 foot a _ Minnesota licensed surveyor );! Existing text - XXXX 12 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX b. proposed _grade elevations at two (2) foot maximum. intervals; c. drainage plan, including the configuration of drainage_areas and 'calculations;( d. storm sewer, catch basins, invert elevations, type of castings, and iype-of materials; e. spot elevations _(maybe prepared by a Minnesota licensed surveyor) ;j - - f. proposed driveway grades; r g. surface water ponding and treatment areas; and erosion control measures: 4. Landscaping plan in accordance with Section 850.10. Landscape, plan must use a copy of the current certificate of survey as a base for the site in question, depicting the following:; a. planting schedule (table) containing:; . _symbols;) ii. quantities; iii.- common names; iv. botanical names;j V. -sizes of p4 ant material;: vi. root specification _(bare root, balled_ and burlapped potted,etc.); and vii. special planting instructions, b. location, type and size of all existing_ significant trees to be removed or preserved,,, P. _planting detail (show all species to scale at normal mature crown diameter or spread for local hardiness zone) -' Existing text - XXXX 13 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading -XXXX d. typical sections with details of fences, tie walls,,planter boxes, tot lots, picnic areas, berms and the like;; 'e. typical sections with details of landscape islands, planter beds, and foundation plantings with identification of materials used; f. note indicating how disturbed soil areas will be restored through, - - - r -- the use of sodding,_ seeding, or other - techniques;;i g. delineation of both sodded and seeded areas with respective Areas in square feet;' h. coverage plan for underground irrigation system, if any;) L where landscape or manmade materials are used to provide, screening from adjacent and neighboring properties, a cross -,, I hrough section shall be provided showing the perspective of the site from the neighboring_ property at the property line elevation, and j. other existing or proposed - conditions which could be expected to affect landscaping; 5.. Other plans and information as required by the Planner including, Put not limited to I . architectural elevations of all principal and accessory buildings (type, color, and materials used in all external surfaces); b. "typical" floor plan and "typical" room plan drawn to scale with a summary of square footage for each use or activity;) c. fire protection plan; d. type, location and size (area and height) of all signs to be erected upon the property in question, e. vicinity map showing the subject property in- reference to nearby highways or major street in and iF. lighting plan; Existing text - XXXX 14 Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX, Text added after Council first reading - XXXX I. Plan Modifications. Minor changes may be authorized by the Planner. Proposed changes to the approved site plan affecting structural types, building coverage, mass, intensity or height, allocation of open space and all other changes which affect the overall design of the property, shall be acted on, reviewed and processed by the Commission and Council in the same manner as they reviewed and processed the site plan., J. Existing Approved Final Development Plan. All existing approved Final Development Plans as of 12 -21 -201.0 are now deemed to be approved site plans.: K. Lapse of Approved -Onal Development Site' Plan by Non -User; Extension of Time. 1. If a building permit has not been obtained, and if erection or alteration of a building, as described in the application for final dvelepmep site plan, has not begun within two (2) years after final development site plan approval, the approval shall be null and void unless a petition for extension of time in which to commence the proposed work or improvements has been granted. 2. A petition for extension shall be made in writing and filed with the City Clerk within such two (2) year period. The petition shall state reasons showing why a building permit has not been obtained, or why erection or alterations have not commenced, and shall state the additional time requested to begin the proposed work or improvement. The petition shall be presented to the Council for hearing and decision in the same manner as then required for an original application. The Council may grant an extension of up to one (1) year upon finding that: a. there is a reasonable expectation that the proposed work or improvement will commence during the extension; and b. the facts which were the basis for approving the final development plan have not materially changed. No more than one (1) extension shall be granted. Subd. 2.41 Rezoning. A. Initiation of Rezoning Process. Existing text - XXXX 15 Stricken text —XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 1. A petition for rezoning may be initiated by the owner of land proposed for rezoning, the Council or the Commission. 2. A petition by an owner shall be on forms provided by the Planner, shall be submitted with plans, data and information required by this Section, and such other information that the Planner believes necessary for evaluation of the petition. The petition shall be accompanied by the fee set forth in Section 185 of this Code. B. Sign. The petitioner for rezoning shall erect, or cause to be erected, at least one (1) sign per street frontage on the land described in the petition. The sign or signs shall be of a design approved by the Planner, shall be thirty -six (36) inches by sixty (60) inches in size, shall have letters at least four (4) inches high using Helvetica medium typeface or other letter style approved by the Planner, shall be constructed of sturdy material, shall be neatly lettered, and shall be easily viewable from, and readable by persons on, the adjoining street. The sign or signs shall contain the following information: "This property proposed for rezoning by: (Name of Petitioner or Applicant) (Telephone Number of Petitioner or Applicant) For information contact Edina Planning Department: Telephone No. 952 - 927 - 8861" The petition shall not be deemed filed and the Gernmission shall not be reqUiFed to hold any heaFingS Gn the petition until the sign has b eFersted as required and fGF at least ten days pFeGeding the heaF The sign shall be kept in good repair and shall be maintained in place until a final decision on the petition has been made by the Council, and shall be removed by the petitioner within five (5) days after the final decision. The failure of any petitioner to comply fully with the provisions of this paragraph relating to the sign shall not prevent the Commission and Council from acting on the petition nor invalidate any rezoning granted by the Council. If the signs are not kept in good repair or removed as required, then the signs shall be deemed a nuisance and may be abated by the City by proceedings under M.S. 429, or any other then applicable provisions of this Code or State Law, and the cost of abatement, including administrative expenses and attorneys' fees, may be levied as a special assessment against the property upon which the sign is located. Existing text - XXXX 16 Stricken text —XXXX Added text —XXXX. Text added after Council first reading - XXXX C. Procedure for Rezoning to Planned Residential D;stF8Gt, Regional IoAGrlina Ili f ink Planned Offine rli 4rin4 Planned Gemmerni•+I DistFiGt and Planned Ind 6tFial IliStFint Preliminary DevelepmeAt Rezoning and Site Plan. The petition for rezoning shall include a preliminary Developm er}t site plan with the required data and information in Section 850.04 Subd. 3. above. drawn to Gale of not smaller than Sit feet to the innh Upon w..inh a ve shown the following data and infen:natien- - by a FegisteFed - t pFepaFed - , existing StFUGtUFes, easements; WhiGh the petitien relates, and any - rj= - - NMI rn; M"71116 gel M - - - - - - - - - - - - am - - T711INWIT. In. 2.00" 2. Commission Review and Hearing. Within 45 days afteF Upon receipt by the Planner of the petition, fee and all other required information, in form and substance acceptable to the Planner, the Planner will review the petition, preliminary Development site plan and the other information provided by the petitioner, and forward a report to the Commission. The Commission shall conduct a public hearing regarding the petition and preliminary Developm site plan. A notice of the date, time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the official newspaper of the City at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing. A similar notice of hearing shall be mailed at least Existing text - XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 17 ten (10) days before the date of the hearing to each owner of property situated wholly or partly within one thousand (1,000) feet of the tract to which the petition relates insofar as the names and addresses of such owners can reasonably be determined by the Clerk from records maintained by the Assessor or from other appropriate records. After reviewing the report of the Planner and hearing the oral or written views of all interested persons, the Commission shall make its decision at the same meeting or at a specified future date and send its recommendation to the Council. No new notice need be given for hearings that are continued by the Commission to a specified future date. 3. Council Hearings and Decision; Preliminary Zoning Approval. Upon request of the Planner, Manager or petitioner, and after review and recommendation by the Commission, the Council shall conduct a public hearing regarding the petition and preliminary site plan. The heaFing shall be held net lateF than 60 days afteF the date e the FeGOmmendation by the Gemmisrien-. A notice of the date, time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the official newspaper of the City at least ten days prior to the date of the hearing. A similar notice of hearing shall be mailed at least ten (10) days before the date of the hearing to each owner of property situated wholly or partly within one thousand (1,000) feet of the tract to which the petition relates insofar as the names and addresses of such owners can reasonably be determined by the Clerk from records maintained by the Assessor or from other appropriate records. After hearing the oral or written views of all interested persons, the Council shall make its decision at the same meeting or at a specified future date. No new notice need be given for hearings that are continued by the Council to a specified future date. An affirmative vote of three -fifths of all members of the Council shall be required to grant preliminary rezoning approval. Provided, however, a rezoning from any residential zoning district to any nonresidential zoning district shall require an affirmative vote of four -fifths of all members of the Council. If preliminary rezoning approval is granted, the petitioner may prepare a final Development site plan. In granting preliminary rezoning approval, the Council may make modifications to the preliminary Developm site plan and may impose conditions on its approval. The petitioner shall include the modifications, and comply with the conditions, in the final Deuelepment site plan, or at another time and by other documents, as the Council may require or as shall be appropriate." Existing text - XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 18 4. Final Development Site Plan. The final Development site plan shall include all required information and data delineated on the preliminary Development site plan and, in addition, the following data and fn#ermatien- required data and information in Section 850.04 Subd. 3. above. MR leGations, dimensions-and design featums of all pi:epesed b. the , ;g aFeas and- sidewalks, tegetheF with dimensions and leratmen layout and design of all e. of all e-Asting, and piteliminai:y appliGable )f this Gode. 5. Final Development Rezoning and Site Plan; Commission Review and Hearing. The Final Development Plan shall be OR fGFFn and substaAGe of the Final Development Plan The Planner shall forward a report to yr �..�r..._.._ Plan-, the Commission. The Commission shall conduct a public hearing regarding the Final Development Plan rezoning and site plan. A notice of the date, time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the official newspaper of the City at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing. A similar notice of hearing shall be mailed at least ten (10) days before the date of the hearing to each owner of property situated wholly or partly within one thousand (1,000) Existing text - XXXX 19 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX feet of the tract to which the petition relates insofar as the names and addresses of such owners can reasonably be determined by the Clerk from records maintained by the Assessor or from other appropriate records. After reviewing the report of the Planner and hearing the oral or written views of all interested persons, the Commission shall make its decision at the same meeting or at a specified future date and send its recommendation to the Council. No new notice need be given for hearings that are continued by the Commission to a specified future date. The Commission sh" may recommend approval by the Council based upon but not limited to the following factors; finding that PFGpesed development- a. is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; b. is consistent with the preliminary Develepm site plan as approved and modified by the Council and contains the Council imposed conditions to the extent the conditions can be complied with by the final DevelepmepA site plan; c. will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract; d. will not result in an overly intensive land use; e. will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards; f. conforms to the provisions of this Section and other applicable provisions of this Code; and g. provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features. A recommendation of approval by the Commission shall be deemed to include a favorable finding on each of the foregoing matters even if not specifically set out in the approval resolution or the minutes of the Commission meeting. 6. Council Hearing and Decision; Final Rezoning. Within 60 days cfter±he recommend Lion on the Final Development Plan by the Gnmmicoinn The Council shall conduct a public hearing on the final Development PUn rezoning and site plan in the same manner and with the same notices as required for preliminary rezoning approval. After hearing the oral and written views of all interested persons, the Council may accept Existing text - XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 20 or reject the findings of the Commission and thereby approve or disapprove the final Development rezoning and site plan. An affirmative vote of three -fifths of all members of the Council shall be required to grant final rezoning approval. Provided, however, a rezoning from any residential zoning district to any nonresidential zoning district shall require an affirmative vote of four -fifths of all members of the Council. appFeval and not done and fulfilled by the Final Development must be fulfilled and mef , to the cat* faGt;en of the _Planner before the c' Plan shall also nonstit ufe final rezoning of the ♦rant innl� ded in f6e plans, and the publiGation of the eFd*nanGe amendment e#ecAing the Ghange shall theFeby be T � 7 but ne publiGation shall be ClnReZnt;l any medmfoGatoons and Genditions made by the GGURGiI have been me} and fulfilled to the a isfartien of the Planner 7. di frinf in oonneotion with _a t the c•..me }ime aa�final - rezoonrr�n 7. Filing. The approved final Development site plan shall be filed in the Planning Department. 8. Development. The development of the tract shall be done and accomplished in full compliance with the approved final Develop site plan, as modified by, and with the conditions made by, the Council, and in full compliance with this Section and other applicable provisions of this Code. Applications for building permits shall be reviewed by the Planning Department prior to issuance of such permits to determine if they conform to the provisions of this Section, the approved final Development site plan, as modified by, and with the conditions made by, the Council, and other applicable provisions of this Code. 9. Changes to Approved Final Deuelepmeat Site Plan. Minor changes in the location and placement of buildings or other improvements due to ^f ^re ee^ ^ir ^.,mstanres may be authorized by the Planner. Proposed changes to the approved final Development site plan affecting structural types, building coverage, mass, intensity or height, allocation of open space and all other changes which affect the overall Existing text - XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 21 design of the property shall be acted on, reviewed and processed by the Commission and Council in the same manner as they reviewed and processed the final Development site plan, except that a three - fifths favorable vote of the Council shall be required to authorize the proposed change. 10. Lapse of Approved Final Development Site Plan by Non -User; Extension of Time. a. If a building permit has not been obtained, and if erection or alteration of a building, as described in the application for final site development plan, has not begun within two (2) years after final development plan approval, the approval shall be null and void unless a petition for extension of time in which to commence the proposed work or improvements has been granted. b. A petition for extension shall be made in writing and filed with the City Clerk within such two (2) year period. The petition shall state reasons showing why a building permit has not been obtained, or why erection or alterations have not commenced, and shall state the additional time requested to begin the proposed work or improvement. The petition shall be presented to the Council for hearing and decision in the same manner as then required for an original application. The Council may grant an extension of up to one (1) year upon finding that: i. there is a reasonable expectation that the proposed work or improvement will commence during the extension; and ii. the facts which were the basis for approving the final development plan have not materially changed. No more than one (1) extension shall be granted. the entire eutlone, dimensions and Fea of the nreperty to Whin.. the Existing text - XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX _W petitmeR-Felatesi and any of its existing MFUGWFes, easements, wateF '76 _ FT - - - - E Existing text - XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 23 _ FT - - - - pp SKI E Existing text - XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 23 _ FT - - - - ■ _ _ �• 0 ti ■ _ ■ _ _ _ _ _ ■ __ —._____.___.-.-.._........ Igo 11110111 �._. �� .��.��_I�i��iil�l ■�'Il7'i'(•a -J t.�1�1��1 1T 117 -.�- E Existing text - XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 23 Existing text - XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 24 - - - - A - - - - - - TMI - - - ' ■- - - - HC - - ■- - - ' Existing text - XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 24 - - - - A - Existing text - XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 24 rl will net Fes It in an overly intensive land ruse• Existing text - XXXX 25 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX - K 7TT7- - - - - - - - - _ - - - ■ ":r_9W.% X FTW F.F-W.-4 M I A T.1 - - - - - - - ... - - - .. ArT rl will net Fes It in an overly intensive land ruse• Existing text - XXXX 25 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX - - - - - - - _ - - - ■ ":r_9W.% X FTW F.F-W.-4 M I A T.1 - - - - - - - ... - - - .. ArT rl will net Fes It in an overly intensive land ruse• Existing text - XXXX 25 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX r f existing c tF UntUrec open spare and natUFal featur Existing text - XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 26 �j IQ ■ ■ - ■ RTWTV - - IM-wamr-Mm 10 ■ - - ........ ■ - ZIN ■ - ■ - - ■ - - - - Existing text - XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 26 �j IQ ■ Existing text - XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 26 IMM Nw- ■ - - - - - ■ ■ WON ■ - - - A. ■ - - - - ■ old - - - - - - - - ■ - IMM - or ■ WON old Existing text - XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 27 - or ■ WON Existing text - XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 27 - or ■ Existing text - XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 27 - - - ' - D. Procedure for Rezoning to a Planned Unit Development (PUD) District. 1. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of the PUD District is to provide comprehensive procedures and standards intended to allow more creativity and flexibility in site plan design than would be possible under a conventional zoning district. The decision to zone property to PUD is a public policy decision for the City Council to make in its legislative capacity. The, 'purpose and intent of -a PUD is to include most or all of the following:; _provide for the establishment of PUD (planned unit development) zoning districts in appropriate settings, and situations to create or maintain a development pattern that is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan; - b. promote a more creative and efficient approach to land, ,,use within the City, while at the same time protecting_. and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and _general welfare of the City; il c. provide for variations to the strict application of the land, use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporate design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Desired design elements may Existing text - XXXX 28 Stricken text — XXWF Added text.— XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX include: sustainable design, greater utilization of new (techtechnologies in building design, special const - ruct - io - t*, nologies landscaping, lighting, stormwater, management, pedestrian oriented design, and podium height at a street or transition to residential neighborhoods, parks or other sensitive uses;,,, d ensure high quality of design and design compatible,__ with surrounding land uses, including both existing and planned;,F_ ,e. maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets an utilities;,, F. —- ____ preserve and enhance site characteristics including' natural features, wetland protection, trees, open s pace, scenic views,- an - d screening g. allow for mixing of land uses within a clevelopment;� drn d h. encourage a variety of housing types including affordable housing; and L ensure the gppropriate transitions between differinland uses 21 Applicability /Criteria _ _ a Uses. All permitted uses, permitted accessory uses., 'conditional uses, and uses allowed by administrative, !permit contained in the various zoning districts defined in Section 850 of this Title shall be treated as potentially, allowable uses within a PUD district, provided they would be allowable on the site under the,_ Comprehensive Plan. Property currently zoned R-1 R-2 and PRD-1 shall not be eligible for a PUMF__ b. Eligibility Standards. To be eligible for a PUD district, all -'development should be in compliance with the where the site of a proposed PUD is designated, for more than-one (1) land use in the, Existing text - XXXX 29 Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading -XXXX Comprehensive Plan, the City may require that the, PUD include all the land uses so designated or such combination of the designated uses as the City Council shall deem appropriate to achieve the purposes of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan ;' ii. any PUD which involves a single land use type or, 'housing type may be permitted provided that it is Otherwise consistent with the objectives of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan; M. permitted densities may be specifically stated in the appropriate planned development designation and shall be in general conformance with the; Comprehensive -Plan; an, m d floor area ratio of the most closely related and iv. the setback regulation, building covers e ;conventional zoning district shall be considered presumptively appropriate, but may be departed from to accomplish the purpose and intent described in #1 above.,' 3. Procedures a. Pre - Application Conference. Prior to filing of an application for PUD, the applicant must arrange for and attend a conference with City staff. The primary purpose an f the conference shall be to provide the applicant with opportunity to gather information and obtain guidance as to the general suitability of the proposal for the area for which it is proposed and its conformity to the provisions of this Title before incurring substantial expense in the preparation of plans, surveys and other data f b. Pre- Application Sketch Plan Review. Prior to filing of a PUD, the applicant is encouraged to submit a sketch plan of the project to the City Planner per Section 850.04 Subd. 3.E. The submittal should include a statement providing justification for the PUD,_ including but not Existing text - XXXX 30 Stricken text —XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX limited to the intended utilization of the item_ s listed in the Purpose and Intent,, and Criteria above, C. Planner hal Commission efer the sketch plan The lan to the Planni g ;Commission and City Council for discussion, review,; and informal comment. Any opinions or comments' provided to the applicant by the Planner, Planning ;Commission, and City Council shall be considered advisory only and shall not constitute a binding decision on the request. There shall be no official application made for a sketch plan. It is an informal - review and comment by planning commission and City; d. Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary — Rezoning. Preliminary development plan submissions'_ nay depict and outline the proposed implementation of the sketch plan for the PUD. The preliminary, - development Plan submissions shall include, but not be limited to, the submission requirements stipulated in' Section 850.04. Subd. 3. Preliminary rezoning process is' stipulated in Section 850.04 Subd. 4.Cj e. Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning. After 'approval of the preliminary development plan, the, applicant may apply for a final development plan and ';final rezoning approval for all or a portion of the PUD The final development plan submissions shall include,' but not be limited to, the submission requirements, 'stipulated in Section 850.04 Subd. 3. Final rezoning process is stipulated in Section 850.04. Subd. 4.0 Final rezoning to PUD becomes official upon adoption of an ordinance rezoning the property j ■ - - a - ` - ■ -- - -:5 - ■ - -- : - ■ _ - - - - - - ■ - -- - - - ' - ■ - - MIN - - - Existing text - XXXX 31 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX Jim ■ 1 _ _ "MMI.M. Existing text - XXXX 32 Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX - - "=r-' - -WIA - - - - - - "IMMMM"M mm! - - - - - - - - r -TZ -� Jim ■ 1 _ _ "MMI.M. Existing text - XXXX 32 Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX "IMMMM"M mm! - - r -TZ -� - - - - - - 21 Mr-T."WMMOM� _ _ _ _ \ I p1r-W, _ MMM I TIM Jim ■ 1 _ _ "MMI.M. Existing text - XXXX 32 Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX &E. Restriction on Rezoning After Denial of Petition. After the Council has denied a petition for rezoning, the owner of the tract to which the petition related may not file a new petition for a period of one year following the date of such denial for transferring the same tract, or any part, to the same district or subdistrict (if the district has been divided into subdistricts) to which such transfer was previously denied. Provided, however, that such petition maybe filed if so directed by the Council- on a three -fifths favorable vote of all members of the Council after presentation to the Council of evidence of a change of facts or circumstances affecting the tract. F. Text Amendments. Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance other than Rezoning �. A petition for a text amendment may be initiated by the owner o Affected land, the Council or the Commission. A petition by an` owner shall be on forms provided by the Planner and such other,, information that the Planner believes necessary for evaluation of the petition. The petition shall be accompanied by the-fee sei forth in Section 185 of this Code; 2. Commission Review and Hearing. Upon receipt of the petition, fee and all other required information, in form and substance acceptable to the Planner, the Planner will review the petition, and the other information provided by the petitioner, and forward a' report to the Commission. The Commission shall conduct a public hearing regarding the petition. A notice of the date, time] place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the official I ewspaper of the City at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the Existing text - XXXX 33 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX - - - - - - - - - - - &E. Restriction on Rezoning After Denial of Petition. After the Council has denied a petition for rezoning, the owner of the tract to which the petition related may not file a new petition for a period of one year following the date of such denial for transferring the same tract, or any part, to the same district or subdistrict (if the district has been divided into subdistricts) to which such transfer was previously denied. Provided, however, that such petition maybe filed if so directed by the Council- on a three -fifths favorable vote of all members of the Council after presentation to the Council of evidence of a change of facts or circumstances affecting the tract. F. Text Amendments. Amendments to the Zoning Ordinance other than Rezoning �. A petition for a text amendment may be initiated by the owner o Affected land, the Council or the Commission. A petition by an` owner shall be on forms provided by the Planner and such other,, information that the Planner believes necessary for evaluation of the petition. The petition shall be accompanied by the-fee sei forth in Section 185 of this Code; 2. Commission Review and Hearing. Upon receipt of the petition, fee and all other required information, in form and substance acceptable to the Planner, the Planner will review the petition, and the other information provided by the petitioner, and forward a' report to the Commission. The Commission shall conduct a public hearing regarding the petition. A notice of the date, time] place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the official I ewspaper of the City at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the Existing text - XXXX 33 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX hearing. After reviewing the report of the Planner and hearing the oral or written views of all interested persons, the Commission shall make its decision at the same meeting or at a specified future date and send its recommendation to the Council. No new, notice need be given for hearings that are continued by the Commission to a specified future date;( b the Commission, the Council shall conduct a public hearing ion 3. Council Hearings and Decision. After review and recommendation y p regarding the proposed text amendment. A notice of the date, time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the official newspaper of the City at least ten (10) days prior to the, date of the hearing. After hearing the oral or written views of all interested persons, the Council shall make its decision at thee, same meeting or at a specified future date. No new notice need be given for hearings that are continued by the Council to a specified future date. An affirmative vote of three -fifths of all members of the Council shall be required to approve a text amendment; - - zi - - - Nr WIMMIN Subd. 5 Conditional Use Permits. A. Initiation of Conditional Use Permit. An application for a conditional use permit may be initiated by the owner or owners of the lot or building in question. Existing text - XXXX 34 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 1. The application shall be on forms provided by the Planner and shall be submitted with required plans, data and information, and such other information as, in the opinion of the Planner, is necessary for evaluation of the application. The application shall be accompanied by the fee set forth in Section 185 of this Code. B. Sign. All provisions and requirements in this Subsection relating to erection of a sign in connection with a rezoning of property shall apply to the applicant for a conditional use permit, and the applicant shall comply with all such provisions and requirements, except that the sign shall state that a conditional use permit is proposed for the property instead of rezoning. C. Application Data. If the conditional use permit is requested to allow a principal or accessory use that requires the construction of a new building or accessory use facilities, or additions or enlargements to an existing building or accessory use facilities, the application shall be drawn to a scale acceptable to the Planner, and be accompanied by plans containing the following data and information: a. elevation drawings of all new buildings or accessory use facilities, or additions and enlargements to existing buildings or accessory use facilities, including a description of existing and proposed exterior building materials; b. the location, dimensions and other pertinent information as to all proposed and existing buildings, structures and other improvements, streets, alleys, driveways, parking areas, loading areas and sidewalks; c. a landscape plan and schedule in accordance with Subsection 850.10; d. a floor plan showing the location, arrangement and floor area of existing and proposed uses; and e. any other information required, in the opinion of the Planner, to evaluate the application, to determine consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, and to ensure compliance with the requirements contained in this Section and other applicable provisions of this Code. Existing text - XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 35 2. If the conditional use permit is requested to allow a principal or accessory use that does not require construction of a new building or accessory use facilities, or additions or enlargements to an existing building or accessory use facilities, the application shall be accompanied by plans showing: a. the location, arrangement and floor area of existing and proposed uses; b. the location, dimensions and other pertinent information as to all buildings, structures, streets, alleys, driveways, parking areas, loading areas, sidewalks and landscaping; and c. any other information required, in the opinion of the Planner, to evaluate the application, determine consistency, with the Comprehensive Plan, and ensure compliance with the requirements contained in this Section and other applicable provisions of this Code. D. Commission Review and Hearing. Within feFty five (45) days after reGeopt b the Planner of the application fee and all ether ren..ired information in ferm and s b tanne nnentable to the Planner the Planner Will review tho Fepert to the Gammiss The Commission shall conduct a public hearing regarding the application. A notice of the date, time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the official newspaper of the City at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing. A similar notice of hearing shall be mailed at least ten (10) days before the date of the hearing to each owner of property situated wholly or partly within one thousand (1,000) feet of the tract to which the petition relates insofar as the names and addresses of such owners can reasonably be determined by the Clerk from records maintained by the Assessor or from other appropriate records. After reviewing the report of the Planner and hearing the oral or written views of all interested persons, the Commission shall make its decision at the same meeting or at a specified future date and send its recommendation to the Council. No new notice need be given for hearings Gh that are continued by the Commission to a specified future date. E. City Council Hearing and Decision. Upon request of the Planner, Manager or applicant, and after review and recommendation by the Commission, the - Council shall conduct a public hearing regarding the application. The hearin,. FeGemmendation by the Gommis A notice of the date, time, place and purpose of the hearing shall be published in the official newspaper of the City at least ten (10) days prior to the date of the hearing. A similar notice of Existing text - XXXX 36 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX hearing shall be mailed at least ten (10) days before the date of the hearing to each owner of property situated wholly or partly within one thousand (1,000) feet of the tract to which the application relates insofar as the names and addresses of such owners can reasonably be determined by the Clerk from records maintained by the Assessor. After hearing the oral and written views of all interested persons, the Council shall make its decision at the same meeting or at a specified future date. No new notice need be given for hearings that are continued to a specified future date. The Council shall not grant a conditional use permit unless it finds that the establishment, maintenance and operation of the use: 1. Does not have an undue adverse impact on governmental facilities, utilities, services or existing or proposed improvements;; 2. , Will generate traffic within the capacity of the streets serving the property; 3. Will not be ini„rieUS to the use and enjoyment or rdenrease the value of ether pizepeictyin the ViGinity, and will not b W, 3. Does not have an undue adverse impact on the public health, safety or welfare;'. 4. Will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other property in the vicinity; o Will nOt GFGate an evnessive burden on paFks � r' Streets and other publin r faGiiitiesi 5. C)-: Conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district in which it is located as imposed by this Section; and 6.; 7�.- Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Approval of a conditional use permit requires a three -fifths favorable vote of all members of the Council. A favorable vote by the Council shall be deemed to include a favorable finding on each of the foregoing matters even if not Existing text - XXXX 37 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX - - - NMIfT.[! _ -. - 1. Does not have an undue adverse impact on governmental facilities, utilities, services or existing or proposed improvements;; 2. , Will generate traffic within the capacity of the streets serving the property; 3. Will not be ini„rieUS to the use and enjoyment or rdenrease the value of ether pizepeictyin the ViGinity, and will not b W, 3. Does not have an undue adverse impact on the public health, safety or welfare;'. 4. Will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other property in the vicinity; o Will nOt GFGate an evnessive burden on paFks � r' Streets and other publin r faGiiitiesi 5. C)-: Conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district in which it is located as imposed by this Section; and 6.; 7�.- Is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Approval of a conditional use permit requires a three -fifths favorable vote of all members of the Council. A favorable vote by the Council shall be deemed to include a favorable finding on each of the foregoing matters even if not Existing text - XXXX 37 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX specifically set out in the approval resolution or the minutes of the Council meeting. F. Conditions and Restrictions. The Commission may recommend that the Council impose, and the Council with or without such recommendation may impose, conditions and restrictions upon the establishment, location, construction, maintenance, operation or duration of the use as deemed necessary for the protection of the public interest and adjacent properties, to ensure compliance with the requirements of this Section and other applicable provisions of this Code, and to ensure consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. The Council may require such evidence and guarantees as it may deem necessary to secure compliance with any conditions imposed. No use shall be established or maintained, and no building or other permit for establishing or maintaining such use shall be granted, until the applicant has met and fulfilled all conditions imposed by the Council to the satisfaction of the Planner. G. Expansions of Conditional Uses. No use allowed by conditional use permit, or any building or structure accessory thereto, shall be increased in gross floor area or height, nor shall any off - street parking facilities accessory to the building or structure be enlarged in surface area to accommodate additional automobiles, without first obtaining, in each instance, a conditional use permit. H. Restriction on Resubmission After Denial. No application for a conditional use permit which has been denied by the Council shall be resubmitted for a period of one year following the date of the denial by the Council. Provided, however, that the application may be resubmitted if so directed by the Council on a three -fifths favorable vote of all members of the Council after presentation to the Council of evidence of a change of facts or circumstances affecting the proposed use or tract on which it is to be located. Lapse of Conditional Use Permit by Non -User, Extension of Time. 1. If no use allowed by the conditional use permit has begun within two (2) years from the granting of the conditional use permit, the conditional use permit shall become null and void unless a petition for extension of time has been granted. 2. A petition for extension shall be in writing and filed with the Clerk within two (2) years from the granting of the conditional use permit. The petition for extension shall state facts showing a good faith attempt to use the conditional use permit and shall state the additional time requested to begin the use. The petition shall be presented to the Council for hearing Existing text - XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 38 and decision in the same manner as then required for an original application. The Council may grant an extension of the conditional use permit for up to one (1) year upon finding that: a. a good faith attempt to use the conditional use permit has been made; b. there is a reasonable expectation that the conditional use permit will be used during the extension; and c. the facts which were the basis for the findings under which the original conditional use permit was granted have not materially changed. No more than one (1) extension shall be granted. For purposes of this paragraph, a use shall be deemed begun when all work described in the original application, or information provided, has been completed and has received final City approvals and the use is operating for the purposes described in the original application. J. Filing of Conditional Use Permit. If a conditional use permit is granted, the applicant, at the applicant's expense, shall duly file or record the permit in the proper office to give constructive notice of it. A verified copy of the permit, with the recording data on it, shall be delivered to the Planner. The Council may require that the permit be so recorded or filed, and the verified copy delivered to the Planner, before the permit shall become effective. _ I M-W - Mr ZM Existing text - XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 39 ■ - - ! - - - - - a F-T. MUM FMM M. My. m2w - -- 72 W- - - - - OWN- unit by - - - - " 'ivi ', I ether the Fe irlenF of the home expeGter) to be day and than home the number Of hGUFG per generated by the GGGUpatien, WT NOW 72 W- tFops to the dwelling unit by exper.ted numbeF of weekly autemebile 'ivi ', I ether the Fe irlenF of the home expeGter) to be day and than home the number Of hGUFG per generated by the GGGUpatien, WT NOW ;11 GpeFate, - - 72 W- Existing text - XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX m ■ _ - - WT NOW _ - - - - Existing text - XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX m 1 - ■ I e:- - �• ..I I - Mr.- - 1 - ■ ■ I - e:- - �• Me- I - - 1 - ■ ■ I - - �• - - - _ _ ■ 15 ■ Existing text - XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 41 Subd. 6 Fees and Charges. A. Petitions and Applications. Each petition or application filed with or submitted to the City pursuant to this Section shall not be deemed filed or submitted, and the City shall have no duty to process it, to act on it or respond to it, unless and until there is paid to the City the applicable fee for such petition or application, as then required by Section 185 of this Code. This paragraph shall not apply to petitions or applications filed or submitted by the Council, the Commission or any City official in its official capacity. B. Administrative Expenses and Attorneys' Fees. Each petitioner and applicant, by filing or submitting a petition or application, shall have agreed to pay all administrative expenses and attorneys' fees, with interest and costs as provided, incurred by the City in connection with or as a result of reviewing and acting on such petition or application. If more than one (1) person signs a Existing text - XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 42 - - ' MIMI ■ • - - - - - mTwr Subd. 6 Fees and Charges. A. Petitions and Applications. Each petition or application filed with or submitted to the City pursuant to this Section shall not be deemed filed or submitted, and the City shall have no duty to process it, to act on it or respond to it, unless and until there is paid to the City the applicable fee for such petition or application, as then required by Section 185 of this Code. This paragraph shall not apply to petitions or applications filed or submitted by the Council, the Commission or any City official in its official capacity. B. Administrative Expenses and Attorneys' Fees. Each petitioner and applicant, by filing or submitting a petition or application, shall have agreed to pay all administrative expenses and attorneys' fees, with interest and costs as provided, incurred by the City in connection with or as a result of reviewing and acting on such petition or application. If more than one (1) person signs a Existing text - XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 42 petition or application, all such signers shall be jointly and severally liable for such expenses and fees, with interest and costs as provided. The expenses and fees to be paid to the City pursuant to this paragraph shall be payable upon demand made by the City, and if not paid within five (5) days after such demand, shall bear interest from the date of demand until paid at a rate equal to the lesser of the highest interest rate allowed by law or two (2) percentage points in excess of the reference rate. The petitioners and applicants shall also pay all costs, including attorneys' fees, incurred by the City in collecting the expenses, fees and interest, with interest on the costs of collection from the dates incurred until paid, at the same interest rate as is payable on the expenses and fees. For purposes of this paragraph, reference rate shall mean the rate publicly announced from time to time by First Edina National Bank, or any successor, as its reference rate, and if the bank, or its successor, ceases publicly announcing its reference rate, reference rate shall mean the interest rate charged from time to time by the bank on 90 -day unsecured business loans to its most creditworthy customers. Subd. 7 Mailed Notice. Whenever this Section requires or permits mailed notice to property owners, the failure to give mailed notice, or defects in the notice, shall not invalidate the proceedings, provided a good faith attempt to comply with the applicable notice requirements was made. Any appropriate records may be used by the person responsible for mailing the notice to determine names and addresses of owners. Subd. 8 Evidence of Ownership. If, in connection with any petition or application, the Planner requests evidence of ownership of the property to which the petition or application relates, the petitioner or applicant shall obtain, at the petitioner's or applicant's expense, and deliver to the Planner, a title opinion from an attorney acceptable to the Planner, or other evidence of such ownership acceptable to the Planner, in each case addressed to the City. Also, if so requested by the Planner, the petitioner or applicant shall obtain a written consent to the petition or application by all owners of such property as shown by the title opinion or other evidence of ownership and, if the request is made, the City shall have no duty to process, or to act on or respond to, such petition or application until such consents are delivered to the Planner. Existing text - XXXX 43 Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX Subd. 9 Violation, Penalty, Remedies. A. Misdemeanor. Any owner or lessee of an entire building or property in or upon which a violation has been committed or shall exist, or any owner or lessee of that part of the building or property in or upon which a violation has been committed or shall exist, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to the penalties and remedies provided in Subsection 100.09 of this Code. IB. G Violation of Conditions in Conditional Use Permits. If any person violates any condition or restriction imposed by the Council in connection with the grant or issuance of a conditional use permit, the City, in addition to other remedies available to it as provided in this Subdivision, may revoke the permit and all rights attributable to such permit. Revocation shall be done in the following manner: 1. The Manager or Planner shall notify the owner and occupant of the property to which such permit exists insofar as the names and addresses of such owner and occupant can reasonably be determined by the Clerk from records maintained by the Assessor, of the violation and request removal within a stated period, but not less than five (5) days. 2. If the violation is not removed within the stated period, the Manager or Planner shall submit a report on the matter to the Council and request a hearing. 3. The Council, upon receipt of the report, shall set a hearing date, and notice shall be given to the owner and occupant at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing. 4. After receiving the oral and written views of all interested persons, the Council shall make its decision at the same meeting or at a specified future date. 5. If the hearing is continued to a specified future date, no new notice need be given. If such permit is revoked by the Council, all use, activity and rights allowed by and attributable to such permit shall immediately cease. Existing text - XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 44 - - - - - - IB. G Violation of Conditions in Conditional Use Permits. If any person violates any condition or restriction imposed by the Council in connection with the grant or issuance of a conditional use permit, the City, in addition to other remedies available to it as provided in this Subdivision, may revoke the permit and all rights attributable to such permit. Revocation shall be done in the following manner: 1. The Manager or Planner shall notify the owner and occupant of the property to which such permit exists insofar as the names and addresses of such owner and occupant can reasonably be determined by the Clerk from records maintained by the Assessor, of the violation and request removal within a stated period, but not less than five (5) days. 2. If the violation is not removed within the stated period, the Manager or Planner shall submit a report on the matter to the Council and request a hearing. 3. The Council, upon receipt of the report, shall set a hearing date, and notice shall be given to the owner and occupant at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing. 4. After receiving the oral and written views of all interested persons, the Council shall make its decision at the same meeting or at a specified future date. 5. If the hearing is continued to a specified future date, no new notice need be given. If such permit is revoked by the Council, all use, activity and rights allowed by and attributable to such permit shall immediately cease. Existing text - XXXX Stricken text — XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 44 Section 2. Subsection 850.09 is amended to add the following: 850.09 Districts. For the purposes of this Section, the City shall be divided into the following zoning districts: Single Dwelling Unit District (R -1) Double Dwelling Unit District (R -2) Planned Residence District (PRD and PSR) Mixed Development District (MDD) Planned Office District (POD) Planned Commercial District (PCD) Planned Industrial District (PID) Regional Medical District (RMD) Automobile Parking District (APD) Heritage Preservation Overlay District (HPD) Floodplain Overlay District (FD) Planned Unit Development District (PUD) Section 3. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Existing text - XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text —XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 45 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2010. City Clerk Existing text - XXXX Stricken text —XXXX Added text — XXXX Text added after Council first reading - XXXX 46 Nov. 16, 2010 City Council Meeting Minutes Page 5 of 9 with a first f0hNeJeation over one foot above the existing homes first floor elev b%Et to wording revisions as discusse . It was agreed that since anot c ea as not held for second reading, the final revision would be available by De , 10, for public review cond reading scheduled for December 21, 2010. Ayes- ett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland otion carried. PUBLIC HEARING HELD — ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -18 GRANTED FIRST READING — ENDING SECTION 850, CONCERNING ADMINISTRATION AND PROCEDURES AND ESTABLISHING A PLANNED UNIT DISTRICT Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Mr. Teague presented the ordinance amendment and explained the primary benefits of creating a Planned Unit District (PUD) zoning district was to allow the City more control over proposed new development to allow flexibility in certain development standards in exchange for greater standards and control. He explained the City's current tools for rezoning were to place conditions on approvals. However, as time passes, conditions could become problematic to enforce and once the site was rezoned and the final development plan approved, the underlying zoning ordinance dictated what could and could not be done. With a PUD rezoning, any conditions placed on approval were written into the Zoning Ordinance and became the regulation for that site. Mr. Teague advised that in each instance, a request for a PUD rezoning was a public policy decision by the Council to make in its legislative capacity. Mr. Teague summarized the proposed ordinance that would amend the entire administrative and procedural sections and add the PUD zoning district, reflect statutory language, and make the ordinance easier to navigate. He also provided an explanation of the proposed process to consider an ordinance text amendment. The City Council requested the definition of "text amendment" be included prior to second reading. Following discussion, the Council requested staff provide clarification on the following prior to second reading: Page 2, Point 5, clarify language so it was understood the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals was not automatically appealed. Mr. Teague explained that anyone outside of staff would be able to appeal the decision. Correct "Heritage Preservation Commission" to "Heritage Preservation Board ". Page 7, Subsection A., Purpose, remove the words "with the." Page 29, Section b.ii., considered to be superfluous and would be deleted. Page 30, Section 3.c., indicate sketch plans would be provided to the Council for informational purposes only. Page 36, Section E., refine the language regarding subjective review and delete second sentence since State action within 60 days was already referenced on Page 1. Revise language regarding traffic review to indicate "road capacities" rather than "road capability." The Council extended its appreciation to the Planning Commission and staff for its work on the proposed ordinance amendment. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 9:26 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made 6 motion, seconded by Member Housh, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to grant First Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2010 -18, amending the Zoning Ordinance concerning administration and procedures and establishing a PUD District, subject to wording revisions as discussed. http: / /www.ci. edina. mn. us/ CityCouncil/ CityCouncil _MeetingMinutesl20101116Reg.htm 12/16/2010 MEETING MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, October 27, 2010 Edina City Hall Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Fischer, Carpenter, Risser, Scherer, Staunton, Schroeder, Brown, Grabiel, Forrest, Rock, Stefanik STAFF PRESENT: Teague, Aaker, Hoogenakker I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: The minutes of the September 29; 2010, meeting was filed as submitted. II. OLD BUSINESS:, 2009.0004.10 Zoning Ordinance Amendments 1. Non- Conforming Use /Alternate Setback Standard Ordinance 2. Driveway Width 3... POD Introduction Planner Teague addressed the Commission and explained since their last meeting planning staff and Roger Knutson's staff reviewed the three ordinances and made grammatical changes and ensured consistency. Teague noted the majority of changes to the text occurred in the Non - Conforming Use /Alternate Setback Standard Ordinance; specifically the Conditional Use Permit addressing additions, repairs, etc. Three "conditions" were incorporated into the Conditional Use Permit process when the first floor is raised by more than one foot; 1) FEMA, 2) Groundwater, and 3) Building Code. Teague said all or one of these conditional must also meet. a fourth condition: ensuring that the new structure or addition fit the character of the neighborhood. Continuing, Teague noted changes from Chair Fischer and informed the Commission that Connie Carrino has also submitted language pertaining to the Non - Conforming Use /Alternate Setback Ordinance as it relates to the first floor elevation for their review. 2. Driveway Width Ordinance Jared Anderson, 4004 Monterey Avenue addressed the Commission and explained that he lives in a 1938 home with a one -stall garage. Mr. Anderson said he would like to add a detached garage to the rear of his home but because of the 12 -foot driveway width requirement he can't do that. Chair Fischer said the proposed ordinance eliminates a minimum driveway width. Mr. Anderson thanked the Commission for their work on this issue. Motion Commissioner Grabiel moved to recommend adoption of the Ordinance Amending the Zoning Ordinance Concerning Driveways, Commissioner Risser seconded ;the motion,: Alf voted aye; motiop carried: .3. Nonconforming Buildings and Uses, Chair Fischer addressed the Commission and said at the last Commission meeting changes were acceptedyand made to the proposed,.ordinance, adding the majority of the discussion and Chang& &focused on the Conditional. Use element of the ordinance and three,conditions� relating to the-first floor elevation of more than one (1) foot above the existing first floor elevation of the existing. dwelling: unit. Fischer noted in the text, presented this evening that additional language was added to address State Building Code, City of,Edbina Code, and other relevant agency requirements. Fischer stated he thought this, an important addition to the ordinance'to minimize conflict between ordinances, state and l;Kuilding codes, etc. Fischer gave -brief examples of Code conflicts. Chair Fischer directed the Commissions attention to a -mails between Roger Knutson and City Staff and Section 3. I. and the term "relevant agency requirements ". Fischer said Knutson suggested eliminating "other relevant agency requirements" and replacing that with "other statutory requirements ". Chair Fischer said in going through the amended language another issue that was brought up at the last meeting was. requiring documentation of ground water by a hydrologist adding after reviewing the building and engineering code requirements it was found that code already requires property owners to hire geotechnical engineers. Fischer asked the Commission:what language they are comfortable with to ensure that ground water issues are present; and if so, how are they addressed. Commissioner Brown commented that the Commission needs to determine who is credible in addressing the ground water issue to document there is an issue, and if so how to correct it. 41 MEETING MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, October 27, 2010 Edina City Hall Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Fischer, Carpenter, Risser, Scherer, Staunton, Schroeder, Brown, Grabiel, Forrest, Rock, Stefanik STAFF PRESENT: Teague, Aaker, Hoogenakker I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: The minutes of_.the September 29, 2010, meeting was filed as submitted. II. OLD BUSINESS: 2009.0004.10 Zoning Ordinance Amendments 1. Non - Conforming Use /Alternate Setback'. Standard Ordinance 2. Driveway Width 3. PUD Introduction Planner Teague addressed the Commission and explained since their last meeting planning staff and Roger Knutson's staff reviewed the three ordinances and made grammatical changes and ensured consistency. Teague noted the majority of changes to the text occurred in the Non - Conforming Use /Alternate Setback Standard Ordinance; specifically the Conditional Use Permit addressing additions, repairs, etc. Three "conditions" were incorporated into the Conditional Use Permit process when the first floor is raised by more than one foot; 1) FEMA, 2) Groundwater, and 3) Building Code. Teague said all or one of these conditional must also meet a fourth condition: ensuring that the new structure or addition fit the character of the neighborhood. Continuing, Teague noted changes from Chair Fischer and informed the Commission that Connie Carrino has also submitted language pertaining to the Non - Conforming Use /Alternate Setback Ordinance as it relates to the first floor elevation for their review. 2. Driveway Width Ordinance Jared Anderson, 4004 Monterey Avenue addressed the Commission and explained that he lives in a 1938 home with a one -stall garage. Mr. Anderson said he would like to add a detached garage to the rear of his home but because of the 12 -foot driveway width requirement he can't do that. Chair Fischer said the proposed ordinance eliminates a minimum driveway width. Mr. Anderson thanked the Commission for their work on this issue. Motion Commissioner Grabiel moved to recommend adoption of the Ordinance Amending the Zoning Ordinance Concerning Driveways. Commissioner Risser secondedk the motion. Alt. voted aye; motion:: carried. 3. Nonconforminq Buildings and Uses:., Chair Fischer addressed the Commission and said at the last Commission meeting changes were accepted and made to the ptoposed'ordinance, adding the majority of the discussion and changes focused on the Conditional Use element of the ordinance and three conditions relating. to the first floor elevation of more than one (1) foot above the existing first floor elevation of the existing; dwelling unit. Fischer noted in the text presented this, evening that additional larguage was.: added to address State Building Code, City of Edina Code, and other relevant agency requirements. Fischer stated he thought.this Was an important addition to the ordinance to minimize conflict between ordinances, state and building codes, etc. Fischer gave brief examples of Code conflicts. Chair Fischer directed the Commissions attention to a -mails between Roger Knutson and City Staff and Section 3. I. and the term "relevant agency requirements ". Fischer said Knutson suggested eliminating "other relevant agency requirements" and replacing that with "other statutory requirements ". Chair Fischer said in going through the amended language another issue that was brought up at the last meeting was, requiring documentation of ground water by a hydrologist adding after reviewing the building and engineering code requirements it was found that code already requires property owners to hire geotechnical engineers. Fischer asked the Commission. what language they are comfortable with to ensure that ground water issues are present; and if so, how are they addressed. Commissioner Brown commented that the Commission needs to determine who is credible in addressing the ground water issue to document there is an issue, and if so how to correct it. -)ep4 . Pl�n�Co en wus� 10 n JVIJAu TO a I ao)o 2009.0004.10 Zoning Ordinance 1. Non - conforming Use /Alternate Setback Standard Ordinance 2. Driveway Width 3. PUD Introduction Chair Fischer briefed the Commission and audience and explained that for the past 18 months the Zoning Ordinance Update Committee /Planning Commission has been discussing and conducting work session meetings on amendments to Edina's zoning ordinance 850. Fischer said some of the goals of the amendment process have been achieved and the Committee continues to work on others. Fischer reported that a recent Minnesota Supreme Court decision on the way municipalities review variances had been changed creating the need for cities to readdress how variances are granted; adding another issue to address during the amendment process. Fischer said the City of Edina is now working on a way to address this recent change through a non- conforming use or alternate setback ordinance. Chair Fischer said three issues would be discussed this evening with a brief presentation by Planner Teague on each: • PUD • Non - conforming use or alternate setback ordinance • Driveway width Planner Presentation Administration and Procedures and establishing a PUD District Planner Teague said in his opinion there are two primary benefits of having PUD zoning. First it allows the City more control over development proposals and secondly it allows flexibility. Teague said that establishing a PUD is legislative (City Council) and if the Council were to elect the PUD process specific conditions could be required as conditions of approval. Planner Teague highlighted the Table of Contents expanding on eight revisions to 850.04 Administration and Procedures as follows: 1. Adds language regarding the 60 /120 -day rule. (State Statute) — 9 Planner Teague briefly outlined where the Committee /Commission was in this process pointing.out that when discussing PUD it should be noted that a PUD is not permitted in the R -1, R -2 or PRD 1 & 2 zoning districts. Teague said the PUD process continues to be a 2 -step process; preliminary and final. Teague added there are concerns with the 60 /120 -day rule and ensuring that the 2 -step process falls within those 120 -days. Attorney Knutson said there isn't a lot of case law "on the books" concerning this requirement, adding an applicant can be sent to as many committees /sub- committees as directed; however an applicant should be able to expect final action within the 120 days. Teague did acknowledge that the City can request additional time above and beyond the 120 -days; however, staff needs to keep abreast of the timeline. 7. Suggests new CUP standards as recommended by the City Attorney. 8. Eliminates temporary CUP's which are not legal. Alternative Setback/Non- conforming Use Ordinance Planner Teague reported that a recent Minnesota Supreme Court decision rejected a 20 -year old ruling regarding the meaning of "undue hardship" in regard to review of variances. Teague said in light of this ruling many cities, including Edina, are considering an ordinance amendment to allow expansion of non - conforming structures, rather than variances. The previous ruling of "undue hardship" meant that cities could determine if the ordinance prevented a "reasonable use" of property. The new ruling holds that a variance cannot be approved unless the ordinance prevents all reasonable use of the property, reiterating this is a major change in the criteria for granting a variance. Continuing, Teague said to provide some background in drafting the proposed ordinance alternative setback/non- conforming use ordinance staff researched variances that have been granted in the past. Over the past 3'/z years 154 residential variances were requested. Of those 154 variances nearly half were for expansion to homes that had non - conforming setbacks. The research found that the variances granted were as low as 13 square feet and as high as 1,000 square feet with an average of around 200 square feet which is the basis for the 200 square foot maximum encroachment suggested in the ordinance amendment. With graphics Teague illustrated examples of non - conforming structures and how the proposed ordinance amendment would work. Continuing, Teague explained another aspect of the proposed ordnance amendments address the one -foot rule. Teague stated that staff wrestled with this, noting the one - foot rule is recent, adding since it was established there have been six variance requests from the rule. Concluding, Teague stated staff proposes to address this through Conditional Use. 11 A discussion ensued and it was agreed that for the present time to leave the ordinance as is; PUD is not permitted in the R -1, R -2, PRD 1 & 2 zoning district. It was also noted the Comprehensive Plan is another way to gauge redevelopment potential. Chair Fischer directed the discussion to the question if new construction would be considered. Planner Teague responded that if a house is torn down it becomes a vacant lot. It doesn't apply; however, one can still apply for a variance. In conclusion focus was directed by Chair Fischer to the PUD ordinance. Fischer said he would like to again stress that an applicant should be encouraged to hold a neighborhood meeting. Commissioners agreed and noted that all means available to the City to "get the word out" would be used to ensure that residents are aware of developments /redevelopments in their neighborhood. It was further-noted that a Sketch Plan Review meeting occurs at both the Planning Commission and Council level and would be found on both agendas. Residents can also sign up for City Extra to keep abreast of what's going on in the City. The following changes to the "Ordinance Amending the Zoning Ordinance Concerning Administration and Procedures and Establishing a PUD District" were reiterated as follows: As previously mentioned pg. 8 1. Eliminate the word strongly... "Applicants are encouraged ". It would also be beneficial in this area to have a reference that encourages the applicant to hold a neighborhood meeting. Also on pg. 8. #1. Eliminate i. as written and replace with: "Additional information that demonstrates the nature, intent, or benefit of the proposed development". Note that this sentence could also be added to "Site Plan Review ". On Pg. 10. G. - Strike the word generally. It was proposed that any references to "scale of plan, site plan drawn to scale" on pages 10 & 16 be "cleaned -up" and made consistent. Mr. Knutson said his staff would incorporate to the best of their ability all changes expressed this evening, adding his staff also proofs for grammar and punctuation. Planner Teague said Planning Staff also reviews and proofs the proposed ordinance changes. Motion Commissioner Grabiel moved to recommend that the City Council amends 850.04 "An Ordinance Amending the Zoning Ordinance Concerning Administration and Procedures and Establishing a PUD District" as presented; including comments and corrections from Commissioners. Commissioner Risser seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. 13 driveway materials, "dust- free" and definition of driveway could wait for further discussion Chair Fischer noted that a number of changes to the draft ordinances have been proposed, adding it may be a good idea to have Planning Staff and the City Attorney's office review and make the suggested changes, check for grammar, etc. and present all three ordinance amendments to the Commission at their October meeting. Commissioners agreed this was best. IV. COMMUNITY COMMENT: None. V. INTRAGOVERNMENTAL BUSINESS: Chair Fischer acknowledged receipt of the Council Connection and asked Commission liaisons if they had anything to add. Commissioner Risser said that the Energy and Environment Commission is encouraging everyone to winterize. Risser also reported that if anyone has a rain barrel the barrel should be drained before it freezes to prevent cracks. VI. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Carpenter moved meeting adjournment at 10:34 pm. Commissioner Risser seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Respectfully submitted: 09ac" cfa genamet 15 MINUTES ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 15, 2010 EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS OPEN HOUSE MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE: Fischer, Carpenter, Risser, Staunton, Schroeder, Brown; Geabiel; Forrest STAFF IN ATTENDANCE: Teague, Aaker and Hoogenakker OTHERS PRESENT: Bennett, Brindle, Carrino, Miller, Porter, Carrino, Westin, Whitbeck, Kresner, Freudnthal Introduction: Chair Fischer informed Members that the Zoning Ordinance Update Committee (ZOUC) continues its overhaul of the zoning ordinance, adding to date the Commission has amended the ordinance regarding building height by creating a building height overlay district. The Committee also amended the front street setback portion of the ordinance. Fischer said their focus tonight is on the language proposed for the non - conforming setback standards, PUD and driveway width. Chair Fischer thanked everyone for attending the open house and opened the discussion on Driveway Width. Topic Driveway Width Introduced: November 24, 2009 Continued discussion: September 15, 2010 Driveway Width /Zoning Ordinance 850.08 Chair Fischer gave background information on the continuing requests for a variance from the existing driveway width minimum width of 12 feet. Fischer said what the Committee has recommended is that there is no minimum driveway width; however there would be a maximum width proposed at 30 -feet or the width of the garage whichever is larger. The following questions were raised: • Are parking pads included in the 30 -foot maximum width or in front of the garage doors? Many property owners want a parking pad to park excess vehicles (i.e. When kids begin to drive, etc.). Chair Fischer said the formation of a PUD ordinance would add flexibility to the ordinance. A PUD is a custom zoning district aimed at benefiting the City. Fischer said a PUD is a legislative decision and the conditions stipulated as a condition of approval become the zoning. Fischer also noted that the Committee agreed to prohibit PUD in all R -1, R -2 and PRD -1 zoning districts. Planner Teague explained another thing to remember is that a PUD still needs to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan . Teague said the majority of the cities in the Metropolitan area have PUD as part of their ordinance, reiterating Fischer said that PUD provides the City with flexibility. The discussion continued addressing Sketch Plan Review and the ongoing discussion on if Sketch Plan Review should be mandatory or elective. It was acknowledged that some feel sketch plan review should be mandatory; however, the City needs to remain mindful of the "120 rule ". The following comments were made on Sketch Plan Review: The intent of the Sketch Plan Review was to streamline the process. How does the Committee find a balance? Should the Sketch Plan Review be required to go before both the Commission and Council, or just one? Note that if Sketch Plan Review is required the "clock starts ticking" and the 120 -rule starts. How does the City get the word out"? Residents need to be a part of this process; it's critical to success. City Extra, Sun Current all tools to implement "getting the word out ". Topic: Non - conforming /Alternate Setback Standards: Planner Teague said with the recent Supreme Court ruling it became difficult for all Minnesota cities to administer variances as they had in the past. Teague said cities are now looking at different ways to address variances. Teague reported staff reviewed variances over the last 3'/z years and found that one -half of the City's variances were for non - conforming structures. Teague said to add some background that 5 %of the total building permits applied for required a variance. Teague concluded that the difficulty in finding a solution to the ruling is establishing a rule that works for the entire City. The following comments were made: The front yard setback standard has been changed. Has this recent change impacted properties creating the need for variances? Do building codes create instances where variances are necessary? Articulate "what's reasonable ". MINUTES ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE COMMITTEE WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 1, 2010 EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE: Fischer, Carpenter, Risser, Scherer, Staunton, Schroeder, Brown, Grabiel, Forrest, Kata STAFF IN ATTENDANCE: Teague, Aaker and Hoogenakker OTHERS PRESENT: Hansen, Carrino, Busyn, Rhode, Porter acf ..d. Chat Fischer,tojd the Cgimmission :'the ZOUC.hes_been workg for the past 18onths on�:ewriting thezoning jrdinance: adding in;lightof..a recent,Minnesota SuprerreCourt decision rejecting :a 20 year old ruling regar li:hg ti :e;.meaning:�of "undue hardship the "re: =write committee" has:anothdr:item to renew; the;:Non- Conforming..Use ordigarice.. Chaai ` Fischer sajd'at thisaime`the ZOUC would discuss the Non - Conforming ordinance, Drivewa! y Width and P.UD. opic: ,.;:Non - Conforming use c ntrodtced: September 1;::201 Planner _Teague reiterated that the recent Supreme Court's ruling rejecting the meaning of "undue hardship" created the need for many cities, including Edina, to consider an ordinance amendment to allow the expansion of non - conforming structures to match existing non - conforming setbacks. Planner Teague also noted that additionally the City of Edina amended the ordinance on first floor building height for new homes after a tear down. This recent amendment was adopted to address the massing issue. Teague reported since that change the City has granted six variances to allow a taller first -floor elevation than the one -foot that was recently adopted. Continuing, Planner Teague said there are instances where it was /is best to elevate the new home to get it out of an area with a high water table or flood plain. Chair Fischer opened the discussion on the Non - Conforming Use Ordinance. Discussion A discussion ensued with Committee Members asking who reviews the building permit/site plans regarding ground water and flood plain and questioned where the "four- feet" came from. Page 1 of 5 front of the house to the west. He explained that the house to the west was positioned deep on the lot. This placement limits redevelopment options for his home. Andy. Porter, 6125 Westridge Road, addressed the Committee and said his issue is with the front street setback requirement. He suggested that the ordinance be amended to require a front yard setback 1000 feet; adding it's probably ridiculous notion, but requesting a setback from that standard would be reasonable. The discussion continued with the following points being made: • Acknowledge there are instances of hardship. • Be careful that any changes to the ordinance don't create unbuildable lots. • Is making setbacks "extreme" as mentioned by Mr. Porter a way to approach the new ruling... • Acknowledge that water bodies, flood plain and high water tables are present in essed. d. o`���:- �ad�dr :��'d.iina•:and nee :f properties th it received Carefully'eesearr-.the c ate the number of exi; ices for tle'past few y lot and ; ` b" Itiple street Driveway Widtfj DateIntroducecf�Novgmb`er24, 2009 •i • Is this creating a two -step process when it was only a one -step process? • The variance process is different between residential and commercial. If a PUD is established variances on the commercial level would be minimal. • Which body would conduct the public hearing? • Should both the Planning Commission and City Council hold the public hearings? • Would the City Council be able to handle the number of variances the City usually receives in one year (acknowledging that may change as the result of the Supreme Court decision) — would the suggestion of placing a variance request as consent be possible. Chair Fischer said he believes that the Committee decided to recommend to the City Council that the Planning Commission would become the Zoning Board of Appeals. Member Brown agreed; however as previously mentioned having the Planning Commission as the Zoning Board of Appeals creates a two -step process and simplicity is best. Planner Teague pointed out another thing to consider is timing. The 60 -day rule applies Member Grabiel`raised,the point with regard J 06i sketch plan review that in his opinion this; f0view shouldn't be formal, adtl.ing in the t eg nning of the discussions on tf is issue he:felt the review should: be informal; more of'a concept without the plans set in stone. Planner Teagu6 reiterafO. if sketch plan review is :mandatory: the: "clock starts ticking" It was suggested that on page 28, 3 b. be- removed Chair Fischer thanked everyone for attending and gave the following dates as follow -up meetings to this, "work session: September 7 — joint meeting.with the City Council September 8 — Work Session September 15 — Open House Work Session adjourned at 10:00 pm. Page 5 of 5 MINUTES OF THE EDINA ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE COMMITTEI MAY 12, 20109 7:00 PM EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS ;I 1 Planning Commissioners in Attendance: Mike Fischer, Kevin Staunton, Arlene Forrest, Nancy Scherer and Steve Brown Staff in Attendance: Cary Teague, Kris Aaker and Jackie Hoogenakker Others Present: Roger Knutson, City Attorney Residents in Attendance: Josh Sprague John Bohan I. APPROVAL OF WORK SESSION MINUTES: There were no minutes to approve. II. OLD BUSINESS: PUD /Sketch Plan Review Introduction Planner Teague explained that the discussion on establishing a process for a PUD began in January and during the following discussions the topic of "sketch plan review" sk came up. Planner Teague a_ ed Members to recall that at the last Zoning Ordinance work session the.minimum lot size requirement for a PUD was removed and a PUD would not be considered for R1 -1, R -2, Prd -1 and PRD -2 zoning districts. It was also recommended that a "sketch plan review" be mandatory for a PUD /rezoning. Continuing, Planner Teague said as the discussion progressed on'sketch plan review guidelines it came apparent that there was some confusion with sketch plan review and the 60 -day rule. Concluding, Planner Teague said Roger Knutson, City Attorney is present to clarify any questions Members may have on the part sketch plan review plays in the process. Discussion Mr. Knutson informed the Commission that pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, an application for Sketch Plan approval /review shall be approved or denied within sixty (60) that with a PUD a "concept/sketch" plan. review would be a requirement. It was also U suggested that a rezoning would also require a sketch/concepL plan [=VIMw. It was further suggested that a checklist be established outlining what is required for each application and that the. checklist be located on/or attached to the application. The checklist would encourage and /or highly recommend a neighborhood meeting and sketch plan review for other applications. The discussion continued with Members asking who would write the new ordinances noting�th6fd are many changes thai need to be implemented that haven't been touched V. on. It was acknowledged that there is an informal draftrfora PUD, but it's only in the draft stages. Members asked Mr. Knutson if he has any, ides; ortrow #o``joceed with the re -write r �ti ti process on the more complicated zoning issyrds�(PUD), . Mr.' fCliutson said the majority of cities he works with hire a consultant to:;draf#'a new ordinance¢ .Mr. Knutson said if the Commission was only tackling specifc'se tions of the ordinance_ ;to meet. Met Council' requirements that's one thing; howeVig't"' t appeaire that the present intent is to completely re -write the entire zorting ordinance; b i.n 'that's the case a;:consultant may be the way to proceed. Mr. KiI- tson suggested that the Commission talk to the City Council to see if funds are evei):::available for an- ordinance re- write. The discussion ensued with Chair Fischer reminding Members that the Planning Commission will meet. it tiie.,City Council on Junes 3 t.. At INS" meeting the Commission will updafe the Council on th'Ore4pte process and the Commission could also suggest hiring*a:consultan ":to complete the re -write of the ordinance. Chair Fischer said he envisions a'/ hour report Pn wherethe Commission has been and where we are going....:. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 24, 2010 Page 4 of 8 Public Comment John Bo n, 800 Coventry, told the Commission he believes the podium height (2 -story at inq street level) concept resulted from conversations with merchants and residents i the Cahill and West 70th Street neighborhood. Mr. Bohan also referred to the dra wilding height overlay district as it relates to C ntennial Lakes, HOD-4, points out the map indicates 4- stories; how , the Coventry at Centennial Lakes is only tones. Chair Fischer said he re ed the discussion on Centennial Lakes and as Planner Teague if the r soning behind the 4- stories is that sites with a simi zoning designati must be treated equally. Planner Teague responded that is rrect. Conti mg, Planner Teague pointed out that currently there is no height li ' in th entennial Lakes area. The proposed ordinance would reduce heigh ' this area possibly more than any other in the City. Action / \ Commissioner Staunto moved to recommend a tion of an Ordinance amending the Zonin rdinance to add a Building ight Overlay District, pages Al -A6, incl ding the most recent appendix A, a the March 24, 2010 memo with the nderstanding that this amendment imp height wherever it as dictated in the Comprehensive Plan by im rting it into the height ov lay district, and where the Comprehensive Plan s silent the current zoning restrictions regarding height would be retaine . Commissioner Brown seconded the motion. Ayes; Carpenter, ser, Sc herer, Staunton, Brown Grabiel, Forrest, Fischer. Nay; Schroe r. Motion carried 8 -1 Discussion - Planned Unit Development Planner Presentation Planner Teague reminded the Commission the PUD topic has been separated into four separate elements: 1) Purpose and Intent (goals) 2) Applicability /Criteria; 3) Process /Procedures; and 4) Rules /Standards. Planner Teague said the topic this evening is Rules /Standards. Planner Teague said what has been discussed up to this point and potential language that could be used as the Rules /Standards section. Planner Teague reminded the Commission at the past meetings discussion the two acre minimum requirement was removed, and a sketch plan is required for a PUD or rezoning. A public meeting is required and residents within 1,000 feet would be notified; and the Planning Commission Meeting Minutes March 24, 2010 Page 6 of 8 comments from Commissioner Grabiel (depending on what Mr. Knutson says) that the formalities could be minimized. She said posting the sketch plan review meeting instead of mailings, etc. should suffice and staff /commission encouraging an applicant to meet with neighboring property owners (prior to the public hearing) so no one is blind sighted would be good advice. Commissioner Brown, said his understanding of a sketch plan review was to provide the Commission with the opportunity to offer feedback to an applicant on how nine Commissioners felt about a certain proposal. Commissioner Brown said his understanding was that this meeting would be less formal; only providing the applicant with feedback and was not part of an official public hearing process. Public meeting, not hearing. Commissioner Schroeder asked Planner Teague if a sketch plan application is made what right(s) does the Commission grant the developer. Planner Teague responded that the sketch plan review meeting does not afford the applicant any rights. A sketch plan review meeting provides only feedback, no Aye, Nay action. Commissioner Staunton pointed out #3 on procedures which indicates approved or denied, adding that language needs to be addressed, noting that further along in the ordinance it states any opinions or comments are advisory. Planner Teague agreed that the language needs to be re- addressed and clarified by the City Attorney. Chair Fischer noted that at the last meeting the Commission talked to a developer about the benefit of a sketch plan review, adding in his opinion a sketch plan review benefits everyone, applicant, staff, Commission and the neighbors. Commissioner Grabiel questioned what would stop a developer from using the Community Comment section on the Agenda to solicit ideas from the Commission as long as no formal application has been made. Commissioner Grabiel said the goal is not to exclude the public in the process but to provide feedback. If everything is formalized the sketch plan review would just add another step to the process. Commissioner Brown suggested that to "get around" the time frame constraints that the applicant could withdraw an application and reapply. Planner Teague agreed. Each new application restarts the clock. Chair Fischer suggested that further discussion on the sketch plan review process be put on hold. Chair Fischer referred to the Rules /Standards portion of the ordinance and asked Planner Teague to briefly go through them. MINUTES OF THE EDINA ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE COMMITTEE MARCH 10, 2010,7:30 PM. EDINA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS Planning Commissioners in Attendance: Mike Fischer, Michael Schroeder, Kevin Staunton, Arlene Forrest, Jeff Carpenter, Floyd Grabiel and Steve Brown Staff in Attendance: Cary Teague, Kris Aaker and Jackie Hoogenakker Residents in Attendance: Josh Sprague I. APPROVAL OF WORK SESSION MINUTES: The minutes of the February 10, Zoning Ordinance Update Committee was approved with changes from Chair Fischer. II. OLD TOPICS — CONTINUING DISCUSSION: Topic: Planned Unit Development (PUD) — Intent, Goals or Purpose Date Introduced: January 13, 2010 Date of Discussion: March 10, 2010 Introduction: Planner Teague told the Committee what will be discussed this evening is the third element of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) which is Process /Procedures. Planner Teague asked Committee Members to note the maps provided indicating the City's existing arterial roadways. Planner Teague pointed out most of the City's commercial, industrial and high density residential areas are located on these roadways and would be eligible for a PUD if the property were less than two acres, according to the current draft language. Planner Teague noted that areas that are not included would be the Cahill industrial area, and the Valley View Road and Wooddale area. Planner Teague said the Industrial properties along Cahill road could be considered a transition area between land uses and would also qualify. The two acre minimum in other areas would encourage the consolidation of lots in order to qualify for a PUD. Zoning Ordinance Update Committee Work Session Minutes March 10, 2010 Page 3 of 5 Planner Teague wondered if a sketch plan review meeting is required; would it take the place of the neighborhood meeting? Members acknowledged that was a fair question and a possibility. Chair Fischer said as he understands a "sketch plan review meeting" that only non - binding "comments" from staff, commission and residents would be taken - there would be no vote. Member Forrest noted the sketch plan review meeting would be just that, a meeting; not a public hearing. The discussion continued with Committee Members going back and forth on if a sketch plan review meeting should be mandatory or elective. Members felt that if a sketch plan review meeting is mandatory it should be mandatory for only a PUD /Rezoning with notification required. Members said the goal of the Sketch Plan Review is to achieve'a better product and not add confusion to the process. It was acknowledged a time line of the notice or of the sketch plan review would need to be established and adhered to: Action Committee Members recommended that a Sketch Plan Review meeting be a requirement of a PUD and /or Rezoning and formal notification should be given. A Sketch Plan Review meeting would be a voluntary option for all other applications. Chair Fischer said he would like to focus on the question raised by Planner Teague if there should be a minimum lot/parcel size stipulated for a PUD. After discussion, Committee Members suggested that staff strike the minimum size requirement. It was also stressed that the R -1 Single Dwelling Unit District, R -2, and PRD 1 Residential Zoning Districts would not be considered at this time for PUD designation. Topic: Buildig Height Date Introduced: February Date of Discussion: March 10, Introduction Planner Teague briefed the Commissio reminding them at building height must be brought into compliance with a Comprehensive P n. Continuing Planner Teague said there are option to achieve compliant 1. Establish an overlay district and 2. Write regulatio for each area described in the Comprehensive Plan. projects. Members also expressed the opinion that at this time a "PUD" would not be an option at the residential subdivision level. Mr. Bohan asked what triggers a PUD, and if that choice is left up to the applicant/developers? Mr. Bohan commented that in his opinion it would be difficult to provide answers in ordinance form before questions are even poised. Ms. Westin asked Planner Teague if other municipalities have PUD's? Planner Teague responded in the affirmative, adding to the best of his knowledge Edina is one of the few cities he's come across that doesn't have one. Commissioner Staunton pointed out that there is a wide variety of PUD's, each with differing thresholds and triggers. Commissioner Staunton said the ZOUC will need to be explicit in developing a PUD. Ms. Weston asked who would ultimately make the decision on developing a PUD and folding it into the ordinance. Chair Fischer said the City Council would ultimately have to amend the ordinance and approve established guidelines to determine eligibility for a PUD. Chair Fischer said from his experience the PUD process has been a vigorous process for the developer. Continuing, Chair Fischer stated he agrees with Commissioner Staunton's' comment that there are a number of PUD's styles "out there "; making it imperative that the criteria the Committee establishes for a PUD are as understandable as possible. Concluding, Chair Fischer said a PUD can offer more flexibility and could even be a stricter ordinance interpretation; however, much depends on the circumstance. Chair Fischer stated in Edina control rests with the City with the hope that the City gets the best project. Ms. Westin asked if a PUD wasn't an option in the ordinance would the City continue to have to amend the ordinance time and time again. Chair Fischer responded that could be the case, but not if the zoning was correct. Chair Fischer added that having a PUD isn't the "end all" the City still needs a good strong ordinance. A discussion ensued with Committee Members expressing that the Purpose and Intent section of the proposed PUD ordinance needs to be clear; providing procedures and standards that allow creatively and flexibility. The challenge is to write a PUD that benefits the City and its residents. Committee Members told Planner Teague the draft ordinance and the information he supplied was a great start. It was also expressed that the current ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan work. It was also acknowledged that the goal of implementing a PUD into the Code should be to ensure a higher quality project with great design by allowing the City and the developer to,work with incentives in "getting what both want ". 0 ZOUC Minutes January 13, 2010 Page 5 of 8 Look at what other cities are doing with sustainable design. • Does the City want to Create ordinances ahead of changes he building code? • The Qlti Council needs to take a policy stand on sus nable design. Chair Fischer noted a s previously mentioned th ere are a number of issues to consider with sus.­ ble design, addin a public works site may be a good place to start. Continuing, air Fische aid what he believes the Committee needs to do at this time is o nue the discussion and have staff "find out" what other cities are doing wit rd to sustainable design, what terms to mandate and how it's meas d..Con ing, Chair Fischer said he knows someone (Rick Carter) wh as worked with neapolis, St. Paul, St Louis Park, and many other co unities on this issue. would be willing to meet with the Committee an answer any questions the Com ' ee may have. Action Chair Fischer will i ite a colleague to speak to the Committee on sustainable desi We will invite the EEC to participate in that discussion. Staff would soli other cities to find out how they address sustainable design. C. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Date Introduced: January 13, 2010 Planner Teague addressed the Committee and informed them Edina is one of the few communities without a PUD. Continuing, Planner Teague reminded the Committee this topic has been brought up a number of times by the Planning Commission during review of development proposals. Planner Teague said the following needs to be considered in the decision making process: 1. Should the City adopt a PUD Ordinance? 2. If so, should additional conditions /standards be required? 3. What conditions /standards should be required? 4. Is a PUD the appropriate section of the Zoning Ordinance to require sustainable design principles? 5. Should there be a minimum lot area for a PUD? 6. When would a PUD be justified? 7. Would a PUD allow Edina greater development control? Mud Minutes " January 13, 2010 ' Page T of 8 have been the better way to go. Mr. Bohan said if the Committee decides on a PUD process writing the parameters would be very important. Concluding, Mr. Bohan asked when the Committee was going to "tackle" building height. Planner Teague indicated that the Planning Commission would consider the issue at a regular Planning Commission meeting, likely to be held in February. Further discussion Chair Fischer commented with regard to the Gateway proposal (and other large projects in the City) that in a sense the City has had a PUD process; it just wasn't called that. At this time what is important is for the'City to achieve the best development available; and that could be with a PUD designation. Member Schroeder stated he views the following four elements as key: 1. Intent or goals. Purpose of the PUD designations, and in particular what the City aims to achieve by granting a PUD; 2. Applicability /criteria. Limitations based on parcel size, land use designation, or other vactors defined by the ordinance; 3. Process /procedures. Methods of review that vary from the development review process for development under other zoning classifications; and 4. Rules /standards. Description of flexibility provided for projects under a PUD. Member Forrest commented that it appears to her that residents take comfort in the Zoning Ordinance. Member Grabiel pointed out that sometime in the future it is very possible that Southdale will be redeveloped; questioning what would be the best way to proceed. Continuing, Member Grabiel said the Committee needs to remember in all things (Sustainable Design, PUD) if there are performance standards there is enforcement. Chair Fischer said he views a "thorough" process in creating a PUD classification and developing sustainable design guidelines requiring multiple discussions. Chair Fischer said an important focus would be for the Committee to define intent. Continuing, Chair Fischer stated what needs to be addressed immediately (in the updating process) is building height. Planner Teague agreed, reiterating at the February meeting of the Planning Commission he plans to bring before them language relating to building height. Action Continue discussion on PUD. Off/ a 08in-7// REPORT /RECOMMENDATION 11 To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL j Agenda Item Item No. IV. H. From: John Keprios,_Direct ® Action Park and Recreation Dep rtment F-1 Discussion Date: December 21, 2010 0 Information Subject: ORDINANCE 2010 -21 AMENDMENT CONCERNING THE OPERATION OF ALL TERRAIN VEHICLES, MOTORCYCLES AND SNOWMOBILES ON PUBLIC PROPERTY. ACTION REQUESTED: The Park Board recommends that the Council approve Ordinance 2010 -21 which is an Amendment to Ordinance Section 1435.03 Subdivision 2 (attachment 1) to give the City Manager and Park Director authority to grant use of all- terrain vehicles (ATVs) and snowmobiles on City -owned public property and gives the Edina School District authority to grant use of same on School District property. Park Board also recommends that the City Council waives second reading. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: At their December 14, 2010 meeting, the Park Board unanimously approved a staff recommendation to approve Ordinance 2010 -21 which amends Section 1435.03 Subd. 2 of the City Code, to permit the use of ATVs and snowmobiles on public property. This began on December 3, 2010, with a request from the Edina High School Nordic Ski Team Coach requesting permission to use a snowmobile to groom a trail on city -owned public property that is adjacent to the High School and Creek Valley Elementary School campus. Under current City Code regulations, no City of Edina or School District staff person has the authority to grant permission to use a snowmobile or ATV on either School District or City owned property. To honor the request requires an amendment to the City Code. Therefore, I placed the item on the Park Board's December 14th agenda for their consideration. As stated in the proposed amendment (attachment 1), the City Manager and Park Director would be granted the authority to give permission to operate ATVs or snowmobiles on City -owned public property but not for recreational purposes. The ATV or snowmobile may be used for only maintenance or utility purposes. In other words, the City Manager and Park Director may not grant anyone permission to use an ATV or snowmobile for recreational purposes. Recreational uses would be characterized as riding the vehicle for pleasure or recreational purposes. The use of a snowmobile to groom a trail for Nordic Ski purposes are considered a use for maintenance purposes (to groom the trail) and not a recreational purpose. This amendment would also allow staff to use ATVs or snowmobiles to remove deer from remote wooded areas, allow for search /rescue training and a variety of natural resource maintenance tasks. The Park Board also recommended waiver of 2nd reading which would give the School District authority to legally groom their ski trails immediately following Council approval. ATTACHMENTS: 1). ORDINANCE 2010 -21 AMENDMENT CONCERNING THE OPERATION OF ALL TERRAIN VEHICLES, MOTORCYCLES AND SNOWMOBILES ON PUBLIC PROPERTY. *Changes proposed by Council Member Bennett on 12/21/20120 are highlighted in yellow below. ORDINANCE NO. 2010- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE CONCERNING THE OPERATION OF ALL TERRAIN VEHICLES, MOTORCYCLES AND SNOWMOBILES ON PUBLIC PROPERTY THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 1435.03 Subd. 2 of the Edina City Code is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 2. Public Property. On streets, highways, alleys, sidewalks, parks, playgrounds, school grounds or any other property owned by the public or subject to an easement held by the public, provided, however, (i) properly licensed motorcycles may be operated on streets and highways subject to the provisions of M.S. Chapter 169 and Section 1400 of this Code, (ii) golf carts may be operated on golf courses, iii snowmobiles and all terrain vehicles may be operated in parks and on other property owned by the City, excluding streets and sidewalks, for maintenance and other public purposes but not for recreational use, with the permission of the City Manager or Park Director, and (iv) snowmobiles and all terrain vehicles may be operated on school grounds and on other property owned by a school district for maintenance and other public purposes but not for recreational purposes with the permission of the School Superintendent or the Buildings and Grounds Supervisor. Section 2. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor 15526902 RNK:r12 /21/2010 1 „v ATTACHMENT 1) ORDINANCE NO. 2010 -21 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE CONCERNING THE OPERATION OF ALL TERRAIN VEHICLES, MOTORCYCLES AND SNOWMOBILES ON PUBLIC PROPERTY THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Section 1435.03 Subd. 2 of the Edina City Code is hereby amended as follows: Subd. 2. Public Property. On streets, highways, alleys, sidewalks, parks, playgrounds, school grounds or any other property owned by the public or subject to an easement held by the public, provided, however, (i) properly licensed motorcycles may be operated on streets and highways subject to the provisions of M.S. Chapter 169 and Section 1400 of this Code, (ii) golf carts may be operated on golf courses, Liii snowmobiles and all terrain vehicles may be operated in parks and on other propert y owned by the City, excluding streets and sidewalks for maintenance and other public purposes, not for recreational use, with the permission of the City Manager or Park Director, and (iv) snowmobiles and all terrain vehicles may be operated on school grounds and on other property owned by a school district except for recreational purposes with the permission of the school district. Section 2. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK .4 I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2010. City Clerk V C� �y REPORURECOMMEN RATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.I. From: Cary Teague Planning Director. ® Action Discussion Information Date: December 21, 2010 Subject: Presentation of GrandView District Report — Community Advisory Team Leader Kevin Staunton ACTION REQUESTED: Per the Recommendation /Conclusion in the GrandView District Report, The Community Advisory Team (CAT) recommends: The City Council accept and approve the Report. 2. The City Council adopt the Guiding Principles in this Report as the foundation for development of a small area plan for the GrandView District. 3. The process of developing a small area plan for the GrandView District be led by a community -based advisory team that includes members of the current CAT and Design Team, chosen through an open process similar to that used to form the initial Community Advisory Team. 4. The City retain ownership of all city -owned public property in the GrandView District at least while the planning process continues and potentially beyond depending upon the results of the small area planning process. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached is GrandView District Report. Kevin Staunton, the CAT Facilitator will present the report to the City Council. Grandview District Small Area Guide Plan Process Report to Planning Commission and City Council December 2010 �' •,� �'� � �l �. � � Ste, e Ar y 1 y[ 1 OVERVIEW AND BACKGROUND, The GrandView District includes the area between Eden and Vernon Avenues, crossing Highway 100 on each street. This crescent- shaped district comprises 19 parcels, and a variety of land uses, including retail, commercial, offil 'ce,. housing, public uses, and historic buildings. p Historically, the area was defined commercially by its proximity to Highway 100, built in the 1930's. At onetime, Vernon Avenue was Highway 169, which made this area an important commercial, hub.for shopping, recreation, and services. Over time, the district has evolved to .serve more neighborhood- oriented needs such as grocery, hardware,'restaurants, clinics, and significant public uses such as the Senior Center, Library and City Hall. As such, the district is seen by residents as an important node for services, and by land owners and tenants as an ideal location adjacent to a busy highway. A map showing the parcels included in the District is attached as Appendix A. Since the district was planned and developed during the height -of the emphasis on cars in city planning, non- vehicular traffic has a significant challenge.in the area. Highway 100, while bringing important vehicular traffic into the area, has also served as an impediment to pedestrian and bicycle movements. It is seen by many as an insurmountable barrier to. pedestrians and othernon- vehicular traffic that may access the district. For many years, the district was also home to.the City's Public Works facility. Located at 5146 Eden Avenue, the facility housed all of the City's public.works equipment and personnel: In the early 2000's, with the facility reaching the end of its useful.life, City staff began exploring replacement options. In 2007, the City issued a-Request for Proposals to local developers-for., a potential, redevelopment of the site. -One of the proposals received in response to the RFP .called for the public works facility to move to a new site on Metro Boulevard south of Highway 62 and west of Highway 100 and for the site at 5146 Eden Avenue to be redeveloped as a medical office building. 'After considerable public discussion, the developer withdrew the .proposal to construct a medical office building.at the public works site and the City purchased the Metro Boulevard'site from the developer. The new Public Works Facility was subsequently constructed and, in late July 2010, the City vacated the Public Works facility at5146 Eden. Avenue'and moved to their new headquarters. Page 1 2 Grandview District —Small Area Guide In 2008, the Edina Comprehensive Plan was amended to identify several Potential Areas of Change in the City. As shown in the chart below, the GranclView District is one of these Potential Areas of Change. L.gene. P —WAruY dChang. " •" ,T,�morrs Cona.s � t�� f � •y i 1 e i r 1 r is I: yrRgy, ilk S ti .-vr r . b i1 .. .. ° 5 Flyuro 4.4 A Vil City of Edina Conceptual Land Use Framework: 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update potential Areas of Change Ome or Aenei Photography August 2006 e —1 n_ — _. The amended Comprehensive Plan provides that small area studies of these areas should be conducted in consultation with residents, property owners, business owners and commercial property owners, to produce a guide for redevelopment. A request to initiate a specific small area plan or study can be made by community groups, business groups, the Planning Commission, or City staff. A development proposal that involves a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a rezoning will require a small area plan study prior to planning application. However, the authority to initiate a small area plan rests with the City Council. In late 2009, the Council approved a process designed to engage the community in planning for the future of the old Public Works site and the area surrounding it. The process was to be led by a Community Advisory Team (CAT) made up of interested residents, representatives from City Boards and Commissions, area business and property owners, and a school district representative. The CAT was to be supported by a Design Team made up of Edina residents in the design field, and a staff -led Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). The roles to be played by members of the CAT, Design Team, and TAC were outlined in writing before the process commenced. Copies of the descriptions are attached at Appendix B. Page 13 I I GrandView District — Small Area Guider .. Beginning with a kick -off meeting on April 8, 2010, the CAT met 10 times in a. 20 -day period during the months of April and May 2010.to study the site and the surrounding area. They . determined that the study area should encompass the commercial node at Highway 100.and Vernon, as well as the City Hall campus across Highway 100. During the process (which is described in greater detail later in this report),; the CAT, TAC and Design Team members walked the study area, and looked at potential areas of change, transportation challenges, pedestrian access, and other development issues. By the end of the process, the CAT had developed a set .of seven guiding principles to define the future of the Grandview District. These guiding principles were shared with the City Council in: May 2010. PROCESS As mentioned above, the process leading to the adoption of the seven guiding principles was a compressed one. It began with a kick -off meeting on April 8, 2010 and finished with a Refinement Meeting when the CAT voted on the seven .Guiding'Principles on April 28, 2010. Presentations summarizing the, work were subsequently made to the Planning Commission on April 29, 2010 and to the City Council on May 19, 2010.. Follow up meetings -were held on June 29; 2010 and September 22, 2010. -This Report was formally approved by the CAT in November of 2010. What follows is an overview of what transpired at the meetings held in April and May of 2010. Meeting #1— Kick -off. Meeting On April 8, 2010 the Kick -off meeting was held. The meeting included an introduction of the process, a collection of initial ideas, and the selection of the CAT members. The process was, introduced by Michael Fischer, Kevin Staunton and Michael Schroeder. Mr. Fischer, the Chair of the Planning Commission, had appointed Mr. Staunton to convene the kick -off meeting and Mr. Schroeder to lead the Design Team. Initial ideas were collected from attendees by asking them to write their ideas down and post them on a large sticky - board. The selection of the CAT members was perhaps the most unusual part of the process. Approximately half of the CAT )members were appointed by virtue of their positions on various city'boards or commissions or status as business or property owners in the'area. The remaining members of the CAT were selected by the members of the public who attended the kick -off meeting after members of the public caucused in. 4 groups representing the. four geographic quadrants of the City. Ultimately,, members of the public attending the meeting appointed four "quadrant" representatives and 5 "at- large" representatives to the CAT. Page 14 GranclView District — Small Area Guide MEMOR MEF-OP-1 Members selected to the CAT were as follows: Rearesentative of: Northwest Quadrant Kim Montgomery Northeast Quadrant Steve Buss Southwest Quadrant Sue Davison Southeast Quadrant Gene Persha At large Andy Brown At large Lisa Diehl At large Larry Chestler At large Joann Olsen At large Greg Domke Business Owner Bob Shadduck Business Owner Linda Odell Cowles Property Owner Nancy Grazzini -Olson Heritage Preservation Board Chris Rofidal Planning Commission /CAT Facilitator Kevin Staunton Energy & Environment Commission Michael Platteter Transportation Commission Josh Sprague Parks Commission Ellen Jones Edina School Board Brian Hedberg Page 15 0 Grandview District — Small Area Guidew ; Members of the Design Team were selected-as follows: Landscape Architect Michael Schroeder Architect Peter Sussman Architect Mia Blanchett Architect Tim MclLwain Architect Jim,Miller Architect Scott Davidson' Architect Meriwether Felt Landscape Architect Peter MacDonagh Architect, Landscape. Architect Stefan Helgeson Architect Michael Fischer Initial ideas identified for the Public Works site by those attending the. meeting were: ® Sculpture Garden m Community Garden (2-responses) a Green Space ® Open Space a Wetland ® Urban Forest O Park © Water Tower ® Community Center- (5 responses) ® City Auditorium ® Public Theater /Performing Arts Farmers Market (3 responses) © City Market (2 responses) ® Town Square (5 responses) ® Community School with clinic 0 Multi -Use (gym, park & ride, community center) Sports facility (retractable dome) - a Kid friendly area Park with bike facilities /walking path and playground equipment ® Truck Maintenance Facility ® Bus Garage ® Snow Plow storage m Office (2 responses) ® Service (2 responses) a Medical Clinic ® Manufacturing for medical use ® Surgery Center ® Retail r' GrandView District — Small Area Guide Downtown destination m Mixed Use - office /retail /residential (3 responses) a Sell ® Housing for Edina teachers and City employees Higher Density a Park & Ride (2 responses) Transit Hub /Station (8 responses) ® Light Rail Station (3 responses) a Public Transportation a Plan to accommodate Light Rail ® Biking Hub ® Bikeway ® Sustainable site (2 responses) © Improve local environment Greenway from city Hall to Library Pedestrian friendly (3 responses) Sense /feeling community Bike system.tie= in /connection.(2 responses) a Tie to the "greatest city need" o Gateway image o Ability to grow, adapt over time © Relocation bus garage m Strengthen community identity © Something exciting to look at and use m Public /private partnership 0 Extend the settler one room school house to an old Edina Settlement '0 Plan for future of adjacent sites not just.public works site. Page 17. , Grandview District — Small Area Guide Meeting #2 — Organization and Site Tour On April 10, 2010, a meeting was held to select the CAT chair and to tour the GranclView District. The meeting concluded with developing boundaries of the District, a debriefing of what the CAT viewed on their tour, discussed potential issues and planning for upcoming meetings with developers and business /property owners. 7 Page 18 r i kq 7 Page 18 GrandView District — Small Area Guide Meeting #3 — Developer Roundtable On April 12, 2010, a meeting was held with four developers that live and have done work in Edina. The purpose was to gain insight and perspective of developers as to how to develop the public works site and the potential of future development in the area. Page 19 GrandView District —Small Area Guide. Meeting #4 — Business and Property Owner Roundtable On April 14, 2010, a meeting was held with business and property owners within the GrandView District. The purpose was to gain insight and perspective of those who work and own property within the District. s � •!r. w F. Meeting #5 — Community Meeting On April 21, 2010, a community meeting was held to identify issues; assess the susceptibility to change in the District; consider ideas for redevelopment of the area; and develop a list of ideas for a name for the District. Page 1 10 T. r Grandview District —Small Area Guide The following were submitted as ideas for the name of the district: • JEDA (Jerry's Edina Development Area) • Grandview Heights (8) • Edina Gateway • Eden Center • Bridges over Edina • Arcadia • The Bridges (1) • Edina Town Square • Edina West (1) • Future Zone (1) • Brookside Hollow • The Eye (picture of eye for eye) of Edina • Edina Hub • ETC (Edina Transit Center) • Eden Heights • Arcadia Hills • Edina City Center • Edina Greenway (1) • Grandview Commons (5) • The Darien District • The Crossroads • Edina Crossroads • The Bridges • Prospect Park • Grandview (1) • The Edina Crossing (2) • Grandview Crescent (1) Page 1 11 Grandview District — Small Area Guide Meeting #6 — CAT Summary Meeting On April 22, 2010, the CAT held a meeting to formulate the information gathered so far, with an emphasis on information gathered at the Community meeting. Important issues and concepts were identified from information gathered at previous meetings and organized into seven principle categories. The result was the CAT members agreeing on the following set of principles: 1. Leverage Public Ownership • City Government Center — Library, City Hall, Senior Center • Public Gathering 2. Neighborhood Center with Regional Connections • Retail business opportunity and support Page 1 12 GranclView District — Small Area Guide • Meet business needs • Movement • Diverse goods and services • Economic vitality • Business /Resident Synergy 3. Turn barriers into Opportunity — Work through barriers not around them • School Bus Site • Rail Line • Highway 100 • Transportation Corridors • Topography 4. Design for Present and Future • Functionality • Density 5. Parking • Could fit multiple categories 6. Movement • Pedestrian Friendliness • Better Connectivity • Promote Multimodal Transportation 7. Design /Identity • Innovative Design • Aesthetics • Natural Space • Attractive Space Page 1 13 0 Grandview District —Small Area Guide . • Identity • Image • Gateway • Promote Sustainability Meeting #7 — CAT Communication to the Design Team On April 23, 2010, the CAT communicated the seven principles to the design team. Additionally, Jack Broz, Transportation Consultant to the TAC, presented an overview of ideas to the group on how to deal with the transportation issues in the District. Meeting #8 — Design Charrette On April 23 and April 24, 2010, the Design Team held a Design Charrette at the Edina Senior Center. After the close of the CAT Communication Meeting, the Design Team began sketching ideas based on the seven principles presented by the CAT. The design work continued again the next morning, and resulted in a draft articulation of the principles and an illustration of potential application of the principles. L i� Page 1 14 t Grandview District — Small Area Guide Page 1 15 • /� \ 1 t fI !vim Mi f r�i 9 I Ita :Il � � r Y s • GrandView District — Small Area Guide Page 1 16 T� Grandview District — Small Area Guide Meeting #9 — Open House On April 26, 2010, an Open House was held at City Hall to display all of the work that had gone on up to this point. The visual display included a summary of each meeting. CAT Chair Kevin Staunton and Design Team Leader Michael Schroeder presented a summary of the process and a description of the results coming out of the design charrette. Mr. Staunton described the process followed by the CAT and walked those in attendance through the draft list of the Guiding Principles. Mr. Schroeder then explained the illustration the Design Team had created during the design charrette, noting that it was intended as one example of how the Guiding Principles might be implemented. Page 1 17 GranclView District — Small Area Guide, Meeting #10 — CAT Refinement Meeting On April 27, 2010, the CAT met to review and finalize the Guiding Principles and the illustration created by the Design Team. The CAT discussed each draft Guiding Principle, making edits to some to ensure that they accurately reflected the intent of the CAT. The CAT then voted unanimously to approve the revised list of seven Guiding Principles. After approving the Guiding Principles, the CAT considered the graphic created by the Design Team. It emphasized that the graphic should be viewed as one possible way in which the Guiding Principles could be implemented. The CAT then approved the graphic illustration to be used as an example — not a blueprint — of how the District might develop in a manner consistent with the Guiding Principles." 1 leverage publicly-owned parcels and civic presence to create a vibrant and connected publir Maim that serves as a catalyst for high quality, integrated private development. Enhance the District's economic viability as a neighborhood center frith re ion gStio�s,ireto niz7ghat meeting the needs of both ` businesses and residents will make the district a good place to do business., 3 Turn perceived barriers into opportunities by,layering development over supporting infrastructure and taking advantage of the natural topography of the area. Design for the present and the future by pursuing logical increments of 4 change using key parcels as stepping stones to a more vibrant, walkabl functional, attractive, and life -filled place. Organize parking as an effective resource for the district by linking community parking to public and private destinations while also providing parking that is convenient for businesses and customers. y,djcc u district for people of ail ages (; f I 1�j >1' Page 1 18 Grandview District — Small Area Guide REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL After updating the Planning Commission on its work at the Commission's April 28, 2010 meeting, CAT and Design Team representatives met with the City Council at a Council work session on May 19, 2010. Kevin Staunton and Michael Schroeder made a presentation to the Council that included an overview of the process and an explanation of the Guiding Principles that were developed. The presentation of the Guiding Principles included bullet point explanations created by Mr. Staunton and graphics created by Mr. Schroeder. The bullet points and graphic illustrations are not part of what the CAT adopted at its April 27 meeting but were, instead, intended to help explain and illustrate the intent behind the Guiding Principles. They appeared in the presentation as follows: I I I � r � I � t I i Q i� �1 Illustrative Vision Page 1 19 ■ GrandView District — Small Area Guide Principle 1 - Leverage publicly -owned parcels and civic presence to create a vibrant and connected district that serves as a catalyst for high quality, integrated public and private development. • A substantial portion of the property in the District is publicly -owned (e.g. — City Hall, Public Works, Library /Senior Center, School Bus Garage, Highway Interchange) • The public ownership includes a significant civic presence — City Hall and Library /Senior Center. • Use the existing civic presence to contribute to the future identity of the District and the public ownership to leverage change consistent with the Guiding Principles. Page 120 2 Gus 0 C 4 c a � n O n Ed. w jr Orb Y s r sr'eer s- V p a = ti Eden 4' Publicly -owned parcels � 5 _ r 0 r `w P Y 6 Publicly -owned parcels Grandview District — Small Area Guide Principle 2 - Enhance the District's economic viability as a neighborhood center with regional connections, recognizing that meeting the needs of both businesses and residents will make the district a good place to do business. • Neighborhood residents rely on the District for a wide variety of their day -to -day commercial service needs. • Property and business owners in the District rely on neighborhood residents for customers. • Proximity to major transportation corridors provides opportunities for connections to and from the surrounding region. • The District serves primarily as a neighborhood (rather than regional) center; successful future development of the District must meet the needs of both businesses and residents. A& 1 9 u _ 6VAy a 6un6 �City Hall c 01 , - Eda0 P { Libf�y and slnfo► Center Page 121 t '4 r. 3 t 6 A Y ' o. Regional and neighborhood -based center 1I PI Grandview District —Small Area Guide Principle 3 - Turn perceived barriers into opportunities. Consider layering development over supporting infrastructure and taking advantage of the natural topography of the area. • The basic configuration of its transportation infrastructure — Highway 100, the rail corridor, Vernon and Eden Avenues — has remained unchanged for 70 years. • The transportation infrastructure has been a barrier to integration of the land uses within the district as well as pedestrian and bicycle access to the District. • Those barriers can be overcome. Layering development over the supporting infrastructure and taking advantage of the area's natural topography is one possible technique. i t _ � ti -d it ♦.M Page 122 I r�Y *; fr i Layered development Grandview District — small Area Guide Principle 4 - Design for the present and the future by pursuing logical increments of change using key parcels as stepping- stones to a more vibrant, walkable, functional, attractive, and life- filled place. _ 9 s, b� S ' • Redevelopment will have to occur in stages over time. • Each stage needs to preserve benefits for businesses and customers while incrementally improving the District. • Look for the right sequence of redevelopment that can meet present needs while ultimately creating a more vibrant, walkable, functional, attractive, and life- filled place. Poll Page 123 ilk *OAK f Key parcels for incremental evolution GrandView District — Small Area Guide, Principle 5 - Organize parking as an effective resource for the district by linking community parking to public and private destinations while also providing parking that is convenient for businesses and customers. • The District is currently served by both "convenience" parking that allows customers to quickly access businesses for short visits and by "community" parking. • The existing "community" parking is under - utilized primarily because it has limited connections to District destinations. • Preserve "convenience" parking while improving the utility of "community" parking by linking it to public and private destinations. tves� So I t 1 h Sir F—I B I � 1 I 1 I, a ' I _ I Gus Young lane �— r City Null 1 1 �Je i 1 Pie i i i Eden c 1 1 m 1 i v 1 r - c Tj o ,, 1 �1 1 ¢I 1 .�� !u ------ ----------- V• Qr 1 � I � 1 J 4 \ii i 1� 3 4P `rte �' 3 C At I •'r C'i ory on '�l a 3 y n Cl r / u ,..� o rwr q.rry u,.n�wwn r � - -__I M•w�1rM nkuy Page 124 Parking • GrandView District — Small Area Guide Principle 6 - Improve movement within and access to the district for people of all ages by facilitating multiple modes of transportation, and preserve future transit opportunities provided by the rail corridor. • Currently, access to and movement within the District is almost exclusively accomplished via motor vehicles and discourages pedestrian and bicycle use. • For a variety of reasons, the existing transportation infrastructure creates traffic issues and acts as a barrier to pedestrian and bicycle access to the District. • The District has great potential as a regional transportation hub, including the future transit opportunities provided by the rail corridor. • Future development should create better access to and movement within the District and facilitate multiple modes of transportation. .. . • • library and;�� t• Senior cent!! L40 Page 125 I i I c+cy all •• .....:... .. 1 I` T IF IF. Transportation F�1?1` Grandview District — Small Area Guide Principle 7 - Create an identity and unique sense of place that incorporates natural spaces into a high quality and sustainable development reflecting Edina's innovative development heritage. • Edina has a great heritage of innovative development. • The location of the District makes it one of the most visible gateways to the community. • The GranclView District can be Edina's next innovative development, combining natural spaces and sustainable technology to create a place we can all be proud of. • ..........., AL Y. •Q• ti • •• • A*' 4 • u •' 1: ..•••......`• ~ low • S: : , •tib • se nrt+ •.•.. ... #r .•... - Page 1 26 •v . P :6 Wet Sore fir• - •��••vtnV�. P* ............... Y•� o• c: o. Integrated development i n�............ r Grandview District — Small Area Guide .A ,. !:!.!! .fR IF Demonstration of principles as a concept for evolution of the GrandView district IMPLEMENTATION After the CAT made presentations to the Planning Commission and City Council, the City Council expressed interest in receiving a formal report. Before this Report could be completed and approved, the CAT learned about the potential for funding for a future implementation phase of the process. Since the deadline for the grant funding was to expire before this formal Report could be completed and approved by the Council, the City Council authorized staff to apply for a Livable Communities Demonstration Account (LCDA) grant in July. The grant would defray costs associated with the development of a Small Area Plan which would include the following items: • Market Analysis • Community Needs Analysis • Transportation Analysis and Plan • Redevelopment Phasing Plan • Public Participation Plan • Financial Analysis of Redevelopment Plan If awarded, the grant would likely cover all costs associated with the development of the Small Area Plan, outside of in -kind staff time needed for the process. The grant application envisioned that a team of staff and hired consultants would be responsible for fulfilling each of the provisions. This team would then draft a report, which Page 1 27 0 GrandView District —Small Area Guide:* would be reviewed by the Planning Commis -sion, and then forwarded to the City Council for consideration. The Community Advisory Team would continue to advise the Planning Commission on implementation strategies. The Small Area Plan would help to. inform and drive change in the district over a period of several years. It would serve as a guide to developers and landowners who may want to make changes to their property. The Small Area Plan would also be officially incorporated into the City's Comprehensive Plan. Finally, the City would use the Plan to help communicate with the community about the future of the district. RECOMMENDATION /CONCLUSION As.it submits this Report, the CAT recommends that: 1. The City Council.accept and approve the Report. Z. The City Council adopt the Guiding Principles in this Report as the foundation for development of.a small area plan for the Grandview District. 3. The process of developing a small area plan for the GrandView District be led by a. community -based advisory team that includes members of the current CAT and Design. Team, chosen through an open process similar to that used to form the initial Community Advisory.Team. . 4. The City retain ownership of all city-owned public property in the GrandView District at. least while the planning process continues and potentially beyond depending upon the results of the small area planning process. Page 128 I • ®u INTERLACHEN BLVD , !.-. , x _ to .r 45- . , ., • . ?a � ;T GUS 1v { all LU `t — �tV 4, 4 _ > l .. p - i ' . 4 • • f• �� �.. ` �• - � U � � r.a ,: .:1"'41 I r, `IJ . ' i `� .°f4 r �Y , 3..: "'N. etr 9'tiS V f4� .yl i Public Works Sit 'mall Area Guide 41 400 200 s 400 Feet ADDL ,ix A �� ROLE OF CAT MEMBERS .The, role of the CAT members was defined in advance of the kick -off meeting as follows: Edina's recently adopted Comprehensive Plan identifies several areas of the community where further and more intensive study would be desirable to guide an evolution of land use.. To. facilitate that process in a way that directly engages Edina residents and affected stakeholders, a process has been crafted that includes a Community Advisory Team as the primary translator of public input for a Small Area Guide study area and influence zone. The Small Area Guide is seen as.a critical first step in defining the evolution of land use in those areas of the community With the potential for change (according to the Comprehensive Plan) and a core piece of possible Small Area Plan (which would offer more definitive direction related to land use and "development). The Small Area Guide is intended to frame key principles for land use and development, and to suggest possible development patterns that would support those principles. 'The -Community Advisory Team will be directly responsible for shaping the Small Area Guide, and will work in concert with a volunteer Design Team composed of Edina residents to crate the Guide. CAT members must be Edina residents or an owner of a property of business within the study area, and must agree to participate in a series of meetings occurring during an approximately five week study period. CAT members will be expected to interpret input provided by the public and fairly reflect that input to the Design Team'and eventually, to. the City Council and Planning Commission. CAT membership will include 'representation from the following: ® Planning Commission ® Transportation Commission ® Energy and Environment Commission ® Heritage Preservation Board ® Park Board • School Board , • Property Owner 9 - Business Owner • Community Representative, (residents from each of the four quadrants) • Other Community Representatives (at -large members) CAT representatives from boards'and commission will be appointed by their respective board or commission chair, and will be expected to convey key principles and ideas to their respective board or commission. Business and property owner representatives will be selected by the planning commission chair, CAT convener and designated TAG representative. Th'e CAT" Community Representatives will be selected during the kick -off meeting. One representative will be selected from each quadrant of the City, using TH 100 and TH 62 as the dividing lines. Two additional CAT representatives will be selected as "at- large" members. APPENDIX B A „ _ i While no professional experience in community planning or design is required, CAT members. must exhibit an ability.to participate constructively in a process designed to engage the community and affected stakeholders; .and work cooperatively with other CAT members and the Design Team. In addition, the expectation of this process will be a forward- looking,inclusive vision for the study area, CAT members must possess the ability to consider a wide range of possibilities, and to discern a compelling, economically viable, and publicly supportable direction for the future of the study area. Ultimately, the CAT will present its findings to the Planning Commission and City Council for consideration and further action. The nature of the Small Area Guide process demands active participation throughout the planning period, and CAT members will be expected to attend all . events and meetings identified for the CAT during this process. ROLE OF DESIGN TEAM MEMBERS The role of the Design Team members was defined in advance of the kick -off meeting as follows: The City of Edina is organizing a community - based planning initiative that. will result in a Small Area Guide, a first step in defining the patterns of land use and development and a core component of an eventual Small Area Plan. A key element -of this process is the definition of a Design Team that will be primarily responsible.for establishing the core design and planning directions for the study area defined for the Small Area Guide. The process is.intended to be heavily oriented toward engagement of the community, and will occur over approximately five weeks. The result of the Small Area Guide process will demonstrate a vision for the study area that is forward- looking, economically viable, innovative, sustainable, and publicly supportable. The Design Team will be composed of up to ten professionals representing the following disciplines: ® Architecture ® Landscape Architecture O Urban Design ® Urban Planning o Transportation Planning o Market /Economic Assessment Members must be residents of Edina with relevant experience in projects dealing with master planning for mixed use redevelopment, public space design,, sustainable design, or APPENDIX B. transportation planning. Participation at all events and meetings is encouraged, but active participation during a 1 -1 % day design charrette is mandatory. Key activities will include interactions with a Community. Advisory Team charged with overseeing the preparation of a Small Area Guide, and working collaboratively with other Design Team members to articulate a narrative and.graphic vision and supporting prihciples for the Small. Area Guide. Participation as a member of the Design Team is voluntary, and will not preclude future professional participation in a project resulting from the Small Area Guide. Design Team 'members are expected to* volunteer their time, and to provide any materials anticipated to be needed during their participation in any event related to the Small Area Guide process. ,Z-ZIA, ,oy & b, W t7 \44�n OI +Tti9/ 86 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Wayne Houle, PE 64 � Date: Subject: Public Works Director/ City Engineer December 21, 2010 Agenda Item Item No: IV. J. zAction F] Discussion Information Resolution No. 2010 -127 Setting Public Hearing for Improvement Projects: 1. BA -355 Golf Terrace Street Reconstruction (01/18/2011) 2. BA -334 Minnehaha Woods Street Reconstruction (01/18/2011) Also Receiving Feasibility Report 3. BA -370 Carson's Hill Street Reconstruction (01/18/2011) 4. BA -383 West 44th Street Reconstruction (02101/2011) ACTION REQUESTED: Approve attached Resolution No. 2010 -127, calling for Public Hearing on January 18, 2011 for Golf Terrace Street Improvement: No. BA -355, Minnehaha Woods Street Improvement: No. BA -334 (also receive feasibility report), Carson's Hill Street Improvement: BA -370, and calling for Public Hearing on February 1, 2011 for West 44tH Street Improvement: No. BA -383. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: City staff is requesting public hearings for four neighborhood street reconstruction projects. All projects are initiated by staff and have included an extensive public process. Feasibility reports for three of the four projects will be presented to Council at the January 4, 2011 meeting. The feasibility report for the Minnehaha Woods project is included with this report. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2010 -127 G AEngineeringllmprovements16A355 Golf Terrace Street Recon (2011)1PRELIM DES IGNIFEASIBLITIY1Public Hearing120101221 _RR_BA355. doc RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -127 SET PUBLIC HEARING. FOR JANUARY 18, 2011 FOR NEIGHBORHOOD STREET RECONSTRUCTION FOR: GOLF TERRACE, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -355 MINNEHAHA WOODS, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -334 CARSON'S HILL, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -370 SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR FEBRUARY 1, 2011 City f Edina FOR NEIGHBORHOOD STREET RECONSTRUCTION FOR: y WEST 44TH STREET, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -383 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, that a public hearing shall be held on the 18th day of January, 2011, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at 7:00 p.m. to consider street reconstruction in the neighborhoods of: • Golf Terrace, Improvement No. BA -355; • Minnehaha Woods, Improvement No. BA -334 and also receive Feasibility Report; • Carson's Hill, Improvement No. BA -370. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED and that a public hearing shall be held on the 1st day of February, 2011, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at 7:00 p.m. to consider street reconstruction on West 44th Street, Improvement No. BA -383. ,BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law. Dated: December 21, 2010 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 21, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com City Clerk 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 911A, FEASIBILITY STUDY - BA -334 o e 4 , ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Cn /° CITY OF EDINA v .a MINNEHAHA WOODS NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS January 18, 2011 LOCATION: The project area includes 55th Street (Wooddale Avenue to Park Place), 56" Street (Wooddale Avenue to Minnehaha Creek), Kellogg Place, Kellogg Avenue (56th Street to 54th Street), Oaklawn Avenue (56th Street to 54th Street), Brookview Avenue (56th Street to 54th Street), Park Place (56th Street to 54th Street, Woodcrest Drive (56th Street to Park Place), and Dever Drive. The drawing below is a detailed project location map of the Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood (neighborhood) Roadway Improvements. PROJECT LOCATION ., it so INITIATION & ISSUES: This project was initiated by the City's Engineering and Utility Departments as part of the City's street reconstruction program and Capital Improvement Program to update aging street infrastructure. Included in the Appendix of this study are the results of a property owner questionnaire (questionnaire) the City sent to the project area on September 23, 2010. 133 of the 219 questionnaires sent were completed and returned. Comprehensive Plan According to the City's 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update, sidewalk and bicycle trails are not proposed in the project area. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The majority of the neighborhood's streets and public utilities were constructed from the early 1940's to the early 1960's. .'. Feasibility Study Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements January 18, 2011 Page 2 Streets The neighborhood's existing streets are surfaced with bituminous pavement. Patches, overlays, and sections of alligator cracking are present at random locations throughout the project area as shown in Figure 1. Figure 1 - Looking North on Kellogg Avenue from 55th Street The streets vary in width between 24 feet and 30 feet. While the pavement condition varies throughout the neighborhood, it is generally in poor condition. Only 18% of the streets in the project area have concrete curb and gutter, and 60% of this existing concrete curb and gutter is in poor condition. As part of this study, 14 soil borings were taken in the project area. The borings indicate layers of predominantly silty sand or lean clay beneath the street pavement. Some borings showed that the developers, who built the neighborhood streets, contrary to today's City standards, did not install a layer of aggregate base between the bituminous pavement and the subgrade soils. The absence of a layer of aggregate base contributes to the visible distresses in the street surface. The existing geometry of the intersection at Park Place and Woodcrest Drive has a large surface area of pavement and intersection corners with long radius curb - lines, which allow vehicles to comfortably maneuver through the intersection at speeds higher than typical or desirable for conventional intersections. This geometric condition tends to diminish pedestrian crossing safety and requires additional city resources during snow removal operations. The existing geometric configuration of the intersection is shown in Figure 2. .w Feasibility Study Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements January 18, 2011 `age 3 EXISTING EDGE OF PAV MENT EXISTING DRIVE AY 1 } n- \ - 000 dca Am' GN 1122.20102.23. 12 PM Figure 2 - Existing Geometric Configuration at Park Place/Woodcrest Drive Intersection City Project No. B -096 completed in 2000 was a petitioned project that reconstructed 56th Street between Oaklawn Avenue and Park Place. Reconstruction included the addition of concrete curb and gutter and an extension of the trunk storm sewer pipe within 56th Street from Park Place to Brookview Avenue. Twenty -five (25) driveways featuring decorative concrete textures, brick paver blocks, and upgraded concrete style construction are present in the project area. Sixty -eight (68) decorative landscaping features are located in the right -of -way (ROW) in the project area. Figure 3 depicts typical decorative driveways and landscaping features found in the project area. .a, 5505 Woodcrest Drive - Decorative Driveway 5536 Oaklawn Avenue - Landscaping Feature Figure 3 Feasibility Study Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements January 18, 2011 Page 4 Storm Sewer The neighborhood relies on the slope of the edges of its streets to convey storm water runoff to trunk storm sewer pipes and inlets located along 54th and 56th Streets. These existing trunk pipes outlet directly into Minnehaha Creek. No trunk storm sewer pipes and inlets are located between 54th and 56th Streets. A gentle ridge aligned in an east -west direction between 54th and 55th Streets divides storm water runoff into sheet flows that proceed along the street edges to the trunk storm sewer pipes and inlets located along 54th and 56th Streets. Storm water runoff traveling south to 56th Street makes its way through 55th Street via bituminous valley gutters built into 55th Street's intersections with the neighborhood's north -south streets. Storm water runoff travels 2 to 3 times further overland in the neighborhood than the recommended maximum distance of 500 feet before entering an inlet. This longer distance causes runoff to pool along the edges of many of the streets or at select intersections. Sixty -five (65) residents reported storm water runoff problems via the questionnaire. Below is a list of worst locations of pooling runoff. • The intersection of Kellogg Avenue and 56th Street. • The intersection of Oaklawn Avenue and 55th Street. • A combination of existing street grades, a lack of storm sewer trunk pipe and inlets contribute to driveway and garage flooding at 5523 and 5524 Park Place. Storm water runoff is only marginally conveyed by the neighborhood's bituminous valley gutters and longitudinal street slopes to the existing storm sewer trunk pipe network in 54th and 56th Streets. Figure 4 below shows the intersection of Kellogg Avenue and 56th Street and the resultant stormwater pooling during a recent rain event. Figure 4 — Pooling Runoff at Kellogg Avenue Looking North from 56th Street Feasibility Study Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements January 18, 2011 `age 5 Eighty -five (85) home owners told us they operate sump pumps via. returned questionnaires. They use these pumps to discharge ground water away from their homes. In most cases, their pumps discharge the ground water into their yards 'or an adjacent street. The discharges either seep back towards their, or their neighbor's'home, or pool along street edges. Trunk Water Main and Sanitary Sewer Pipes Trunk water main and sanitary sewer pipe materials are cast iron and clay pipe respectively. The trunk water main and sanitary sewer pipes were constructed from the,early 1940's to the early 1960's. Six -inch (6 ") diameter trunk water main, pipes serve the neighborhood. The valves and fire hydrants along the trunk water main pipe are operable. Drawing No. 1 in the Appendix shows that since 1989, when the City began documenting its trunk water main pipe and City -owned water service pipe breaks, there have been 48 broken trunk water main pipe and City -owned water service pipe repairs. While these repairs have occurred randomly throughout the neighborhood, they do tend to occur more frequently in the older part of the neighborhood west of Brookview Avenue. Nine -inch (9 ") diameter trunk sanitary sewer pipes serve the neighborhood. At the time of this study's publication, closed- circuit television inspections of the trunk sanitary sewer pipes are incomplete. However, there are no recorded blockages of trunk sanitary sewer pipes. Private Water Main and Sanitary Sewer Service Pipes While construction and maintenance records are not available for these pipes, they are the same age as the trunk pipes. The service pipes are likely in a condition similar to the trunk pipes. Water main service pipes within the neighborhood were originally lead pipes. During the 1970's, the City's portion of the service pipe was reconstructed with copper pipes. Sanitary sewer service pipes are likely 6 -inch diameter clay pipes. Based on their age, the City should expect that cracks and separated joints have developed along these pipes. These faults in the pipe facilitate tree root intrusion and the inflow and infiltration of clear ground water into the City's sanitary sewer network. Private Utilities Providers of privately owned gas, electric, telephone and cable television utilities all have infrastructure in the neighborhood. These utilities are either overhead on poles or buried underground both within and outside of the street right -of -way (ROW). The gas main trunk and service pipes are made of steel. Sixty -five (65) residents told us they own and 'operate either an underground pet containment or lawn irrigation system within the project boulevards. Feasibility Study Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements January 18, 201,1 Page 6 Residential Roadway Lighting The neighborhood's roadway.light network consists of a combination of standard cobra head lights mounted on wood poles and traditional cobra head lights mounted. on metal light,. poles. These lights are typically located at the intersections with some lights at mid -block locations. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: The project..involves installing concrete curb and gutter and reconstructing the bituminous. pavement. It also involves extending the existing storm sewer .trunk pipe network and connecting sump pump drain pipe to the trunk storm sewer pipe. The sump pump drain pipe will allow property owners to discharge ground water from their sump pumps into the trunk -.storm sewer pipe network: The project_will also involve reconstructing the trunk water main pipe. The project will spot repair select segments of the trunk sanitary sewer pipe. The scope, of the water main, sanitary and storm sewer reconstruction should meet the following parameters. • Protect boulevard trees. • : 'Provide continuous sewer and water service to residents. • Maintain pedestrian and vehicle access in the neighborhood. • Reconstruct private sanitary sewer service pipes between the sanitary sewer trunk pipe and right -of -way (ROW) line. • Encourage residents to reconstruct their private sanitary sewer service pipe between.the ROW line and.their homes prior to construction. • Reconstruct the City -owned water service pipe between the water main trunk pipe and curb stop ,box. Reconstruction should : "also include replacing all of the curb stops. • Encourage residents to reconstruct their private water main service pipes between- the curb stop and their homes. Streets The project will reconstruct .the,. streets with a bituminous surface to approximately their existing widths. The project will recycle the existing street pavement section. Wherever it is missing today, the project will install a layer of aggregate base between the bituminous pavement and the subgrade soils. The limits of street reconstruction for Park Place, Oaklawn Avenue, and Kellogg Avenue at 54th Street will consider 54th Street's future limits of reconstruction. With the exception of 56th Street between Oaklawn Avenue and Park Place, the project will remove and replace all of the sections of existing concrete curb and gutter. Since a majority of the existing concrete curb and gutter is in poor condition, spot repairs are not as cost effective for the City as complete remova. and replacement. New ,concrete curb and gutter and concrete driveway aprons--- - are proposed for all the streets whether it is present today or not. Feasibility Study Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements January 18, 2011 'age 7 Even though 56th Street between Oaklawn Avenue and Park Place was reconstructed in 2000, the intersections of 56th Street at Oaklawn Avenue and at Park Place will be damaged and then reconstructed with the proposed trunk water main pipe reconstruction. Intersection curb radii will be reduced at the intersection of Park Place and Woodcrest Drive to narrow the pavement at -the intersection, reduce vehicular speed through .turns and make vehicle maneuvers more deliberate for drivers and predictable for pedestrians. The driveway and the introduction of new boulevard at 5417 Woodcrest Drive will be extended to match the proposed curb line. The proposed geometric configuration of the intersection is shown in Figure 5. v I 17 EXISTING EDGE OF PAV MENT y EXISTING DRIVE AY a `O \` PROPOSE DRIVEWAY (Z ' PRGPOS D CURB � I � � DOO C E RES I 32' R� ` T i Azc �N I I '1120102:23:12 M Figure 5 — Proposed Geometric Configuration at Park Place/ Woodcrest Intersection Storm Sewer Wherever possible the project will mitigate pooling storm water runoff along street edges and intersections by both installing concrete curb and gutter along all neighborhood streets and extending the existing storm sewer pipe network in 56th Street north to 55th Street and adding inlets along 55th Street. The project will correct the list of worst locations of pooling runoff given on page 4 of this study as follows. • The intersection of Kellogg Avenue and 56th Street will receive a combination of concrete curb and gutter and valley gutters to allow runoff to sheet flow east to the intersection of " Oaklawn Avenue and 56th Street where storm sewer catch basins are proposed. • The intersection of Oaklawn Avenue and 55th Street will receive storm sewer catch basins. Feasibility Study ,Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements January 18, 2011 Page 8 • An extension of the existing storm sewer pipe network in 56th Street north to proposed inlets near 5520 Park Place will mitigate driveway and garage flooding at 5523 and 5524 Park Place. The project will install one storm water runoff treatment manhole along Brookview Avenue just south of 55th Street. This special manhole will remove most of the sandy sediment and floatable debris. from storm water runoff that flows to 55th :Street before it enters the existing storm sewer trunk pipe in 56th Street that flows directly to Minnehaha Creek. The project will address ground water. flow issues by installing a 6 -inch sump drain trunk pipe behind the concrete curb and gutter throughout the majority of the project wherever it is feasible. This pipe allows the home owner to connect their sump pump discharge service pipes to the storm sewer pipe network. Such connections prevent their sump pumps from discharging back into their yards or an adjacent street. .,A 4 -inch service line pipe will be. installed towards the ROW line in front of the resident's home from the sump drain trunk pipe. From their ROW line, the resident is responsible for installing an underground pipe and any plumbing modifications needed to connect it to their sump pump or footing drain at their' own cost using their own contractor. Trunk Water Main and Sanitary Sewer Pipes The number of breaks in the trunk water main pipes indicate that these pipes are approaching the end of their useful life. The increased costs to maintain the trunk water main pipe and City -owned service pipes lead the City Engineering and Utility Departments to investigate taking advantage of street reconstruction to reconstruct the trunk water main and City -owned water service pipes. Based on those investigations, the City decided that to protect the investment in new streets made. by both the property owners and . the City, the City would reconstruct all.trunk water main pipe,>as part of the project. Failure to, repair the trunk water main pipes now would inevitably lead to future trunk water main pipe breaks where restoration would include concrete curb and gutter and bituminous patches. Due to the depth and location of the trunk water main pipes, traditional open cut pipe reconstruction methods .involving the excavation of a trench will be used on a limited basis. in non - sensitive areas. Limiting the use' of open cut method will protect boulevard trees and landscaping. The project will reconstruct 80% of the trunk water main trunk pipe network using a trenchless reconstruction method called pipe bursting. Drawing No. 3 in the Appendix shows the proposed combination of open cut and pipe bursting reconstruction methods to be deployed in this project. During the reconstruction of the water main, residents will have continuous water service. Temporary water main and service pipes will be strung out on the ground along the boulevards and front yards of the neighborhood's streets. These temporary pipes are connected to sections of the existing water mail already, or not yet, reconstructed.. Continuous water service, is provided to each home via its outside garden hose spigot. The contractor will need access into Feasibility Study Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements January 18, 2011 rage 9 each home in the neighborhood to make a proper temporary water main connection. The project will replace all of the existing fire hydrants with new City standard hydrants. The project will move hydrants that are too close ' to an edge of a driveway pavement to the nearest boulevard location adjacent to side -yard property lines. The project will add hydrants in locations where the spacing of the existing hydrants exceed the recommended 500 -ft. Reconstruction will repair the trunk sanitary sewer pipes that have tree roots intruding into the pipe, or the pipe has sagged or cracked. Soon to be completed closed circuit television inspections will provide the exact locations, if any, of these repairs. Wherever possible, the repairs will be completed using open cut repair methods. In sensitive locations, repairs will be completed using trenchless repair methods. Private Utilities CenterPoint Energy reports that they want to take advantage of street reconstruction in the project area to upgrade all of their steel gas main trunk and service pipes to plastic pipe. The City would coordinate this upgrade with CenterPoint Energy prior to the start of street reconstruction. The City will repair any damage to privately -owned pet containment and irrigation utilities caused by street and City utility reconstruction activities. Private Water Main and Sanitary Sewer Service Pipes Reconstructing the trunk water main pipe using pipe bursting method destroys the connection between the City -owned water service pipe and the trunk water .main pipe. A small excavation is needed to restore this connection. The City will take advantage of this excavation, make it larger, and reconstruct the entire City - owned water service pipe including the curb stop box as shown in Drawing No. 4. Because CenterPoint Energy will reconstruct its gas main and service pipes that are beneath the neighborhood's streets, the only non- reconstructed existing utility that will remain beneath the new streets are the private sanitary sewer service pipes. To protect the investment in. new streets made by the property owners and the City, the City will reconstruct with this project each private sanitary sewer service pipe between the trunk sanitary sewer pipe and the ROW line as shown in Drawing No. 4. Drawing No. 4 also shows the limits of the service pipes owned by the property owners. Reconstructing the service pipes to these limits with this project mitigates the opportunity for future potential damage to the new street surface due to future private sanitary sewer service pipe repairs. Furthermore, property owners would not have to pay the cost to patch the new street while accomplishing a future repair. Because the City will reconstruct resident -owned sanitary sewer service pipe to the ROW line with this project, residents can avoid potential future blockages and eliminate the inflow and infiltration of clear groundwater along the balance of their service pipe by reconstructing their sanitary sewer service pipe to their home at their own cost using their own contractor.. Based on the City's experiences reconstructing private sanitary sewer service pipes during the Feasibility Study Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements January 18, 2011 Page 10 Country Club Area's. Sewer Water and Street Reconstruction Project during 2008 and 2009, the City believes property owners in Minnehaha Woods may discover it 'costs .about the same amount to have their own contractor reconstruct the private sanitary sewer service pipe between the trunk sanitary sewer pipe and their home as it does for the City's, contractor to reconstruct the private sanitary sewer service pipe between the trunk sanitary sewer pipe and the ROW line. Residents should.take advantage of the coming disruptions in the neighborhood caused by the project and complete their service pipe reconstruction work before the' City's. contractor begins their work. This schedule for the residents is necessary to maximize the progress of the City's contractor. If a property owner chooses to reconstruct their private sanitary sewer service pipe between the trunk sanitary sewer pipe and their home; the City will allow the property owner's piumber to leave a temporary patch in the street pavement and temporarily restore : the City -owned boulevard. During street reconstruction, the City's contractor, would, complete the final restoration the street pavement and City - owned boulevard. If a resident chooses to reconstruct their sanitary sewer service all the way to their home, that' would likely be the best time to also reconstruct their water service pipe'from'the. curb stop to their home at their own cost using their own contractor. Because the sanitary sewer and water service pipes are likely near each,other, a resident can usually reconstruct both of these service pipes to their home by digging only one trench across their yard. Furthermore, a resident will likely realize a cost savings if they reconstruct both of these service pipes simultan`e.ously; versus reconstructing each service pipe separately. If a resident has reconstructed their private service pipe(s) within approximately the past 15 years, there is probably no need for that resident to again reconstruct that service pipe(s) now. Residents can discover whether or not their service pipe(s)-have been reconstructed by contacting the City's Building Department. Options do exist for residents to reconstruct both of their service pipes across their yards with minimal digging. Residents can use the new trenchless pipe reconstruction methods the City intends to use to reconstruct its trunk water main and sanitary sewer pipes. While these options can be more expensive to accomplish, they can protect a resident's landscaping, sidewalk, or driveway that may be located above both of the service pipes., At the December 9, 2010 Open House neighborhood property owners were encouraged to reconstruct. their entire water service and sanitary sewer service pipes from the curb stop box and trunk sanitary sewer pipe respectively to their home before the City's reconstruction project begins. In an effort to facilitate this reconstruction work by the property owners, the City made available to property owners at the Open House a Plumbers Questionnaire Summary dated February 28, 2008. That summary is included in the Appendix of this study. Residential Roadway Lighting and Sidewalks The -questionnaire asked if the project area wanted to reconstruct the street lights and add a sidewalk to the project area. The results report that the project area's Feasibility Study. Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements January 18, 2011 'age 11 property owners do not want to reconstruct the street lights or add a sidewalk to the project area. These items are not included in the proposed improvements. RIGHT -OF -WAY: Adequate ROW exists to implement this project. EASEMENTS: Easement acquisition is not anticipated to reconstruct this project area. PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $6,611,000 (2011 Dollars). The estimated total project cost is summarized in Table 1. Table 1 Summary of Total Estimated Project Cost ITEM ESTIMATED COST 2 $4,500 CITY RESIDENTS Sanitary Sewer Trunk Pipe $175,000 Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe Between the Trunk Pipe and the Right -Of -Way line' $861,000 Water Main Trunk Pipe and Service Pipe Up'To and Including Curb Stop Box $2,215,000 Storm Sewer $1,100,000 Street Reconstruction $2,260,000 Sub -total $3,490,000 $3,121,000 Total $6,611,000 ' Cost to be assessed to residents 2 Costs are given in 2011 dollar The total estimated cost includes indirect costs for engineering and clerical and finance costs from start of construction to final assessment hearing. ASSESSMENTS: An estimated special assessment rate of approximately $16,300 (2011 Dollars) per residential equivalent unit (REU) is proposed, to be levied against the property owners in the project area. There are 192,REU's in the project area. The estimated total assessment rate is summarized in Table 2. Table 2 Summary of Total Estimated Assessment Rates per REU ITEM ESTIMATED ASSESSMENT' Sanitary.Sewer Service Pipe Between the Trunk Pipe and the Right -Of -Way line $4,500 Street Reconstruction $1.11800 Total .$16,300 ' Assessment rate is given in 2011 dollars Drawing No. 2 in the Appendix of this study summarizes the application of the estimated assessment rates. Properties that abut the project but their addresses are not included in the project will be either not assessed due to past assessments or assessed at either 1/3 or 2/3 of the estimated rate. The following are exceptions to this statement. Feasibility Study Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements January 18, 2011 Page 12 • .5600 Woodcrest Drive, 5601 Woodcrest Drive, 5601 Park Place: Private sanitary sewer service pipes for these 3 properties are outside the project's limits. Therefore, the City will not reconstruct any segment of the service pipes with this project. These 3 properties are proposed to be assessed' at 1 /3'of the estimated street reconstruction assessment rate or $3,935. The City will consider deducting that portion of the assessment rate for the sanitary sewer service pipe repair if the resident: • repairs using their own contractor their own private sanitary sewer service pipe ,between at .least the trunk sanitary sewer pipe and ROW line before reconstruction is underway, or • has replaced their entire sanitary sewer service pipe with PVC pipe in the last 15 years. A copy of the preliminary assessment roll is included in the Appendix. FEASIBILITY: City staff and its consulting engineer believe the improvements are necessary, cost - effective, and'feasible from an engineering stand point. PROJECT SCHEDULE: The estimated schedule shown in Table 3 is feasible from an Engineering standpoint. Table 3 Project Schedule Event Date Pavement Rehabilitation'Open House September 20, 2010 Neighborhood Informational Meeting December 9, 2010 Public Improvement Hearing January 18, 2011 Bid Opening March 2011 Award Contract April 2011 Begin Construction May 2011 Complete Construction ` Fall 2011 Final Assessment Hearing Fall.2012 Drawing No. 1 Drawing No. 2 Drawing No. 3 Drawing No. 4 City of Edina Minnehaha Woods Water Main & Service Breaks Assessment Summary Water Main Reconstruction Typical Section Showing Utility Ownership APPENDIX ➢ Certification Page ➢ Local Street Reconstruction Program Open House Invitation dated September 7, 2010 ➢ Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements - Resident Questionnaire Transmittal Letter and Questionnaire dated September 23, 2010 ➢ Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Property Owner Questionnaire Results Summary `as of October 8, 2010 ➢ Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Informational Meeting Invitation dated November 30, 2010 ➢ Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Informational Meeting Attendance Roster dated December 9, 2010 ➢ List of Questions asked by Residents at the December 9, 2010 Informational Meeting ➢ Plumbers Questionnaire Summary Provided to Residents at the December 9, 2010 Informational Meeting ➢ Preliminary Assessment Roll City of Edina DRAWING NO.1 MY, Minnehaha Woods BA334 N Watermain & Service Breaks wJ —E S O Main Engineering Dept Service September, 2010 • E E ai 2 N 0 a� E °C 5320 5331 5328 5331 5320 5325 5324 5337 5332 5337 5324 (24 5329 5328 5341 5336 5343 5326 5333 5332 5349 5346 5351 5337 5336 5351 5348 5357 5336 54TH ST W fl5l 00 5401 5400 5401 5400 04 5405 5404 5405 5404 540 GOLF 5404 -TE 408 5409 5408 5409 5408 412 5413 5412 5413 5412 5412 416 5417 5416 5417 5416 541 5416 420 5421 5420 5421 5420 5421 5420 w 424 5424 Q 5425 5424 5425 5424 5425 Z 5321 5320 Ln 5324 j Q 5609 5608 5328 x 5333 LL 5332 J 00 Q 5501 5336 = 24 4200 4113 4015 5413 5417 5421 5425 5427 5429 5428 > 5428 �r. 5429 5428 5429 5428 E 5437 Q Q 5433 5432 0 5433 5432 Y 5433 5432 5433 5432 5437 5436 0 5437 5438 O 5437 5436 5437 5436 542 5428 432 5440 5441 J I J Y 55TH ST W w DEVER IOAK n r V 5501 5415 5420 5428 5432 56TH ST W 5525 Q 5601 5600 76 U 5501 2� 5605 5601 5600 Q� 5609 5608 KELLOGG PL 5608 5611 5601 00 D 55Go R 5501 5500 5501 5500 5501 5500 5608 5605 5604 80 5605 1 5612 5616 5620 5628 5501 5505 5504 5505 5504 j 5505 5504 5504 5504 82 85 5633 J 5505 9 24 29 30 56 5616 5609 Y 5509 5508 5509 5508 5509 5506 Y 5509 5508 55 5645 7 O m 10 29 5664 cc 5509 5513 5512 5513 5512 5513 5512 a 5513 5508 1 REU -Estimated $16,300 Assessment 5655 5512 550'. 5517 5516 5517 5516 (2011 5517 5516 oil- 5513 5521 5520 5521 5520 o 5521 5520 DEVER � 5516 5525 5524 5525 5524 5525 5524 �6A 5515 5523 5517 5521 5501 5415 5420 5428 5432 56TH ST W 5525 Q 5601 5600 76 U 5501 2� 5605 5601 5600 Q� 5609 5608 KELLOGG PL 5608 5611 5601 00 5613 5617 5608 5605 5604 80 5605 S� 81 5612 5616 5620 5628 5612 5615 5617 82 85 5633 8 9 24 29 30 56 5616 5609 � 21 25 Legend 5645 7 OO 10 29 5664 D 1 REU -Estimated $16,300 Assessment 5655 6 Z � 11 29 0 24 5660 (2011 Dollars) o z 26 1/3 REU - Estimated $3,935 Assessment o5556 (2011 Dollars) 4 5 21 12 p 22 5665 5552 51 Not Assessed WOODLAND RO 13 19 20 5661 WOOD Project Limits 14 15 16 i8 5657 5653 564 24 4428 4424 4420 4416 4412 4408 4404 4400 4328 4324 4320 4318 4312 4308 4304 4300 4208 Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Improvements ED NA Project: 3734 Assessment Drawing Drawing SEH No. BA -334 Print Date: Summary 2 Edina, Minnesota 12/8/2010 OAK DR w Q W J a O D O O 5337 1 5336 1 1 5351 1 5348 1 1 5357 1 5336 54TH S 5321 5320 V1 2q 5324 j a 5328 x \2 5333 aLL 5332 J 5336 = 24 4200 41 54'3 5417 5421 5425 75427 111-1 5420 5428 5432 5440 5501 5512 5509 16 5515 70 5517 72 5521 56TS%T W U 5525 2D 5600 5601 5600 5601 5600 5601 1 5600 76 . 5601 5604 5605 5625 5609 56;11 , 0� 5604 5605 5604 S °6 �O 5609 KELLOGG PL 5608 5508 Sfitt gp 5613 5608 5605 5617 561)4 5605 81 5612 5616 5620 5628 5612 5615 5617 82 85 5609 5633 8 9 24 `9 30 56" 5616 88 21 5610 5615 25 5645 7 00 84 O 10 26 5664 2 r � D 5655 6 A 11 23 DO 24 5660 Legend 89 O Za 26 5656 Reconstruct Pipe Using 4 s 12 21 0 Open -Cut Methods 22 5665 5 5705 3: 565z Reconstruct Pipe Using WOODLANDRO 13 19 20 5661 WOOD Pipe Burst Methods 14 15 15 '8 5657 5653 564 24 4428 4424 4420 4416 4412 4408 4404 4400 4328 4324 4320 4316 4312 4308 4304 4300 4208 Minnehaha Woods Project: Drawing 1 Neighborhood Improvements EDINA 113734 Water Main No. '`, No. BA -334 Print Date: Reconstruction SEH Edina, Minnesota 12701/2010 q 9 5320 5331 5328 5331 5320 5325 5324 5337 5332 5337 5324 5329 5328 5341 5336 5343 5328 5333 5332 5349 5346 5351 5337 1 5336 1 1 5351 1 5348 1 1 5357 1 5336 54TH S 5321 5320 V1 2q 5324 j a 5328 x \2 5333 aLL 5332 J 5336 = 24 4200 41 54'3 5417 5421 5425 75427 111-1 5420 5428 5432 5440 5501 5512 5509 16 5515 70 5517 72 5521 56TS%T W U 5525 2D 5600 5601 5600 5601 5600 5601 1 5600 76 . 5601 5604 5605 5625 5609 56;11 , 0� 5604 5605 5604 S °6 �O 5609 KELLOGG PL 5608 5508 Sfitt gp 5613 5608 5605 5617 561)4 5605 81 5612 5616 5620 5628 5612 5615 5617 82 85 5609 5633 8 9 24 `9 30 56" 5616 88 21 5610 5615 25 5645 7 00 84 O 10 26 5664 2 r � D 5655 6 A 11 23 DO 24 5660 Legend 89 O Za 26 5656 Reconstruct Pipe Using 4 s 12 21 0 Open -Cut Methods 22 5665 5 5705 3: 565z Reconstruct Pipe Using WOODLANDRO 13 19 20 5661 WOOD Pipe Burst Methods 14 15 15 '8 5657 5653 564 24 4428 4424 4420 4416 4412 4408 4404 4400 4328 4324 4320 4316 4312 4308 4304 4300 4208 Minnehaha Woods Project: Drawing 1 Neighborhood Improvements EDINA 113734 Water Main No. '`, No. BA -334 Print Date: Reconstruction SEH Edina, Minnesota 12701/2010 q 9 ,3Fhd\FeasMlMy RapmVwamlCVk\emu no 4 tra emm.dgn /tee KEYED NOTES: OA WATER MAIN SERVICE PIPE RECONSTRUCTION BY CITY POSSIBLE WATER MAIN SERVICE PIPE RECONSTRUCTION BY RESIDENT © SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PIPE RECONSTRUCTION BY CITY OD POSSIBLE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE PIPE RECONSTRUCTION BY RESIDENT K zm zv cn z o)> D z M C,7 co 0z =z 0�= D�D -A- m o Coon mu) K m z in 0 * *m� zzn� =�zo� �C N � T �:k = z o �0 v �o z 17 SANITARY SEWER PIPE Ita FEASIBILITY STUDY - BA -334 MINNEHAHA WOODS NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS SEH No. EDINA 113734 January 18, 2011 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 4��'4eja' —/,Z;r - -Z 70i� Paul J. Pask644f PE Date: Lic. No.: Reviewed by: - Date Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300 Minnetonka, MN 55343 -9301 952.912.2600 September 7, 2010 RE: 2011 Street Reconstruction Projects Dear Resident: Last fall you were notified that the City of Edina initiated the process of roadway and utility improvements for your neighborhood for the summer of 2011. At the same time you were also invited to an open house to learn more about the process. Once again, you are invited to attend a similar informational meeting on Monday, September 20, 7:00 p.m., at the new Public Works and Park Maintenance Facility, located at 7450 Metro Boulevard, see attached map on back. The meeting will consist of a short presentation starting at 7:15 p.m. with question and answer to follow. The presentation will cover topics such as "How are streets selected for reconstruction; Who funds the project; Special Assessment; What can I expect during construction; How can I stay informed." The exact amount that you will be assessed for this project will not be available in time for the open house; however, based on past projects, you can expect the amount to be between $8,000 to $12,000. To prepare for the meeting, please review the enclosed brochure "A Guide to Edina's Street Reconstruction Process ". Also for additional information on our Reconstruction Process please go to our website at http:// www. CityOfEdina.com /FutureProjects. Please contact Assistant City Engineer, Jack Sullivan if you have any questions or if you are unable to attend and would like more information on the process. Jack can be reached at jsullivan�rc ci.edina.mn.us or 952 - 826 -0445. Sincerely, XW A4� Wayne D. Houle, P.E. Director of Public Works and City Engineer G:\Engineering\lnfrastructure \Streets \pavement management\14eighborhood Reconstruction Program\2011 and 2012 Street Recon\2011 Open House Letter.doc W 70TH ST T 70TH ST � o J J � ti V � J J 0 Ui N F- 2 2 Uj W 74TH ST O New Public Works Building I� 0 W 76TH ST t EDINA INDUS RIAL W 77TH ST BLVD =! 3J Ij City of Edina 0 New Public Works Building 7450 Metro Blvd " Edina, MN 55439 W S September 23, 2010 City of Edina RE: 2011 Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements — Resident Questionnaire Transmittal Letter Dear Resident: The City of Edina has initiated the process of roadway and utility improvements for the summer of 2011 for your neighborhood. The first step was to .hire the firm Short, Elliott, Hendrickson, Inc. (SEH) to assist us with the preparation of a feasibility study of the improvements. You may have already noticed staff from SEH in the neighborhood 'gathering information such as photographs and measurements. The second step was to hold an open house on September 20, 2010, for you to become familiar with the process. Things to know and consider: • Residents pay a portion of the overall project cost in the form of a special assessment. Typical special assessments range from $8,000 to $15,000 per Residential Equivalent Unit (REU) or, per property, and are payable over 10 years. You will not be billed for the special assessment until October 2012. Estimated special assessments for your neighborhood will not be determined until after information has been gathered from the questionnaires and a feasibility report is completed. • Components of a project vary and are based on questionnaire responses. Special assessments typically include cost of new roadway, sidewalk and streetlights. Other utility upgrades such as water main, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and concrete curb and gutter are funded through the utility fund and are not special assessed. • Construction typically starts in spring /early summer and end in late fall of the same year. The next step is to get feedback from you regarding a number of key components of the project. The information you share with us is essential in determining certain aspects of the project that may be constructed. This information will be discussed at the project information meeting in mid - November, 2010. The following information explains the questionnaire that is enclosed with this notification. A map showing the boundaries of the area to be reconstructed is also enclosed. After reading this letter completely, please complete the questionnaire and return by October 8, 2010, in the self - addressed stamped envelope. I. Drainage Service Connection Do you use_a sump pump or have you considered installing one? Do you currently have a footing drain? The project could include a sump drain system along the roadway to collect groundwater, City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 -826 -0379 2011 Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Project — Resident Questionnaire Page 2 of 3 discharges from private sump pumps, roof drains or any other storm water runoff from private property. A typical sump pump discharges onto a homeowner's lawn. This can cause problems with your lawn, your neighbor's lawn, or your basement if your lawn drains back to your home. Discharging a sump pump onto the lawn can also cause problems with the street if the discharge constantly runs down the gutter line promoting algae growth. Discharging the sump pump into the sanitary sewer system such as floor drains or laundry tubs is against the law, both City Ordinance and State Statute. If the topography and final street designs favor a City sump drain system we will need to know if you currently have a sump pump or a footing drain. Any plumbing needed between your home and the City sump drain system would be your responsibility. The City sump drain system is funded through the storm sewer utility fund. II. Local Drainage Problems Does storm water run -off stand in the street in front of your house? Does it stand in your yard for long periods of time? We would like to know if these situations are occurring in your area.- If'they are, please describe the issue in the local drainage problems section of -the questionnaire. This improvement project could provide and opportunity to correct some of these issues. III. Private Underground Utilities Some residents install private underground utilities in the City owned boulevards. These utilities are usually lawn irrigation or pet containment systems. Utility and roadway reconstruction can damage these utilities. If they are damaged, they will be repaired as part of the project. However, if the contractor knows the location of these private utilities, they can attempt to avoid damaging them. If you have any private underground utilities, please tell us in the private underground utilities section of the questionnaire. IV. Residential Street Lights As part of all improvement projects, staff asks if residents favor upgrading their street light system or installing a new system. In some cases, the street light system is at the end of its useful life and requires upgrading. New light systems typically have lights installed at the corners of street intersections and place additional lights at approximately the middle of the block. Funding for street lights are currently through special assessments. The typical cost is approximately $1,500 to $2,500 per REU or, per property. In the residential street light section of the questionnaire are examples of the different styles of street lighting that could be installed in your neighborhood. Please rank your style preferences. Please note that ranking your style preferences does not mean you are in favor of streetlights. V. Pedestrian Issues As part of all reconstruction projects, staff asks if residents see a need to add sidewalks to the neighborhood. Funding for sidewalks is split between special assessments, the City of Edina and the Edina School District (if the sidewalk falls within a school walking zone). The typical cost to add a couple blocks of sidewalks to a multi -block area is $300 -$600 per REU or, per property. If you know of a problem at a pedestrian crossing, missing sidewalk or other pedestrian issues please tell us about it in the pedestrian issues section of the questionnaire. 2041 Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Project — Resident Questionnaire Page 3 of 3 VI. Traffic Management The Edina Transportation Commission typically reviews traffic issues on local streets. We would like to know if you feel that your roadway has a traffic issue. Please tell us about it the traffic management section of the questionnaire. Receive Project Updates via the City Extra If you sign up for our "City Extra" e-mail notification service, you will receive project updates as they occur. During feasibility study preparations, such updates are usually notifications of upcoming meetings. Later, if the Council chooses to proceed with construction of this project, the updates will occur weekly. During construction, the updates will include information such as when access to your driveway might be limited or when to have your contractor repair your private lawn irrigation system if it was damaged by construction activities. The "City Extra" is our best form of communication with you. This service is free and allows individuals to sign up to receive e-mail messages from the City on a variety of topics. To sign up for the service go to the City Extra website at http : / /citvextra.citvofedina.com and place a check mark in the box next to this project's name, "Minnehaha Woods Improvement Project" Please contact the City at 952 - 927 -8861 if you are having trouble signing up for City Extra. Questions If you have questions after reading this letter, please email me at jstruve(a_ci.edina.mn.us or call me at 952 - 903 -5713. Sincere , Jesse Struve, PE Utility Engineer Enclosed: Property Owners Questionnaire Self- Addressed Stamped Envelope Neighborhood Reconstruction Map September 23, 2010 PROPERTY OWNERS QUESTIONNAIRE 2011 MINNEHAHA WOODS NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF EDINA Please do not answer these questions until after you have read the entire newsletter. Please complete and return this survey by October 8. 2010, using the self- addressed stamped - envelope. Drainage Service Connection: A. Does your home have a drain tile /footing drain? O Yes O No OUnknown B. Does your home have a sump pump? O Yes O No OUnknown C. Would you be willing-to connect your sump pump O Yes O No up to a City drain if provided (at your own cost)? D. Would you be willing to connect your roof drains O Yes O No up to a City drain if provided (at your own cost)? Please sketch in the space to the right: your house, garage, driveway, sump pump discharge location and approximately where along the ROW line you would like the service connection pipe placed. R HOUSE ROW EXAMPLE GARAGE HOUSE SERVICE OCONNECTION PIPE HERE ROW ----------- - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - -- CURB LINE Local Drainage Problems — please list specific surface water drainage problems in your neighborhood: III. Private Underground Utilities A. Do you have an underground lawn irrigation system in the City right -of -way boulevard and if so which company services your irrigation system? (Typically the right -of -way is 10' to 15' behind the roadway.) O Yes O No B. Do you have an underground electric pet containment system in the City's right -of -way Boulevard? O Yes 1 of 3 O No IV. V. • A September 23, 2010 Residential Street Lights: A. Do you favor upgrading your streetlights (there is a direct cost of approximately $1,500 to $2,500 per REU)? O Yes O No B. If the streetlights are upgraded, which style do you prefer? Please rank all the styles from 1 to 5, with 5 being most liked. Please answer even if you answered "IV. A" as "No ". Acorn: Coach: Style can be viewed along Concord Ave Style can be viewed in the Sunnyslope from Valley View Rd to South View Ln, neighborhood, just north of Edina City Edina. Hall, Edina. A Dislike 0 0 0 O O Like 1 2 3 4 5 Arlington Lantern: Style can be viewed in the Country Club neighborhood, just north of West 50th St along Wooddale Ave, Edina. Dislike O O O O O Like 1 2 3 4 5 Pedestrian Issues: Dislike O O O O O Like 1 2 3 4 5 Round Lantern: Style can be viewed at County Road 101 and W 78th St North, Maple Grove. Dislike 13 17 O O O Like 1 2 3 4 5 A. Knowing that residents pay a portion of sidewalk costs in Edina, do you see a need to add new sidewalks in your neighborhood? B. If Yes, Where? O Yes 13 No 2 of 3 September 23, 2010 C. Please list specific neighborhood pedestrian issues below (e.g. crossing adjacent busy roadways, etc.). VI. Traffic Management A. Do you feel your neighborhood or roadway has any traffic issues? O Yes O No B. If yes, what is it and where does it occur? Thank you for your cooperation. Please return this questionnaire in the enclosed self- addressed, stamped - envelope. Please complete all questions and return to the City of Edina by October 8. 2010. 3 of 3 �a gn a� E � �o TELF 6320 5331 5328 5331 5320 5321 5320 5408 025 to 5324 5337 5332 5337 5324 24 5324 W 5409 Q` 5608 5605 5620 5628 5617 5604 5605 5612 5615 82 5329 5328 5341 5336 5343 5328 3 5328 x 5408 ti 533 3 5333 5332 5349 5346 5351 `2F 5332 5633 8 5337 5336 5351 5348 5357 5336 Oy9 5336 = �24'0 5413 5412 5413 54TH ST W 5413 5401 5400 5401 5400 5401 5400 24 25 84 5403 5404 5405 5404 5405 5404 540 4200 TELF 5409 5408 5409 5408 5608 5605 5620 5628 5617 5604 5605 5612 5615 82 5409 5408 5705 5633 8 4113 Project Limits 5413 5412 5413 5412 5413 5412 25 84 24 a 10 28 5664 5616 5617 24 5413 5655 fi p 5621 23 . 5660 5620 86 5416 5417 5416 5417 5416 5417 5416 45420 5417 5721 5425 5427 5421 5420 5421 5420 5421 5420 5429 5433 5425 5424 5424 5425 5124 w 5425 Z 5428 5429 5428 5428 5129 5428 5429 5433 5432 a 5433 5432 y 5433 5432 5433 5432 5437 5436 0 5437 5436 0 5437 5436 5437 5436 5437 2 5428 32 J y 55TH ST W > DEVER DR 5501 5500 5501 5500 5501 5500 3 5501 5500 01 5501 5505 5504 5505 5504 5505 5504 w 5505 5504 5504 OAK J 5505 U 5509 5508 5509 5508 5509 5508 00 5509 5508 Y 5509 K 5513 5512 5513 5512 5513 5512 m 5513 5512 Qa 5508 5509 W 5513 Q 5517 5516 5517 5516 5517 5516 5517 5516 Oft+. 5513 DEER � 5521 5520 5521 5520 5521 5520 5521 5520 p 5525 5524 5525 5524 5525 5524 5525 5524 5523 5521 5517 b. 3 5529 5528 5529 5528 5529 5528 5529 5528 5527 5520 5533 5532 5533 5532 5533 5532 5533 5532 5533 5524 5537 5536 5537 5536 5537 5536 5537 5536 5537 5528 56TH ST W 5600 5601 5600 5601 5600 5601 5600 ` 5601 5601 5604 5605 5625 5609 5604 5605 5504 5600 5441 5501 5512 5509 O 16 may~ 5515 QG 70 5517 a 72 5521 7a 5525 76 n Q' J 5632 O 4 5 12 21 00, 22 5665 3 5652 5648 5640 5636 WOODLANb`, 13 79 20 5661 WOODCREST DR 5633 14 15 16 18, 5657 ? 5649 5645 5641 5637 24 4428 1 4424 4420 4416 4412 4408 4404 4400 4328 4324 4320 4316 4312 4308 4304 4300 4208 k� Preliminary Project Area } Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Improvements " Improvements No: BA -334 M, to] I 81 BS 88 89 5609 KELLOGG 5608 PL 5601 5608 5611 5613 5612 5676 5617 5608 5605 5620 5628 5617 5604 5605 5612 5615 82 5705 5633 8 5609 9 24 29 30 56 5708 27 5616 5610 5615 24 5645 7 25 84 24 a 10 28 5664 5616 5617 24 5655 fi p 5621 23 . 5660 5620 86 A 11 0, 24 G Z: 26. 5624 5629 Q' J 5632 O 4 5 12 21 00, 22 5665 3 5652 5648 5640 5636 WOODLANb`, 13 79 20 5661 WOODCREST DR 5633 14 15 16 18, 5657 ? 5649 5645 5641 5637 24 4428 1 4424 4420 4416 4412 4408 4404 4400 4328 4324 4320 4316 4312 4308 4304 4300 4208 k� Preliminary Project Area } Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Improvements " Improvements No: BA -334 M, to] I 81 BS 88 89 N W +E S September 2010 5704 / 5705 5708 24 24 5712 N W +E S September 2010 Summary I. II. III. IV. PROPERTY OWNERS QUESTIONNAIRE 2011 MINNEHAHA WOODS NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF EDINA Questionnaire Results Number of questionnaires mailed 219 Number of returned questionnaires 133 Percentage returned questionnaires 61% Drainage Service Connection: A. Does your home have a drain tile /footing drain? B. Does your home have a sump pump? 69 Yes 39 No 23 Unknown 85 Yes 47 No 2 Unknown C. Would you be willing to connect your sump pump up to a City drain if provided (at your own cost)? 17 Yes 88 No D. Would you be willing to connect your roof drains up to a City drain if provided (at your own cost)? 13 Yes 103 No Local Drainage Problems— please list specific surface water drainage problems in your neighborhood: Comments available upon request. Private Underground Utilities A. Do you have an underground lawn irrigation system in the City right -of -way boulevard and if so which company services your irrigation system? (Typically the right -of -way is 10' to 15' behind the roadway.) 53 Yes 80 No B. Do you have an underground electric pet containment system in the City's right -of -way Boulevard? 12 Yes 120 No Residential Street Lights: A. Do you favor upgrading your streetlights (there is a direct cost of approximately $1,500 to $2,500 per REU)? 29 Yes 99 No B. If the streetlights are upgraded, which style do you prefer? Please rank all the styles from 1 to 5 with 5 being most liked. Acorn Coach Arlington Round 251 308 317 233 1 of 2 V. Pedestrian Issues: A. Knowing that residents pay a portion of sidewalk costs in Edina, do you see a need to add new sidewalks in your neighborhood? 13 Yes 119 No B. If yes, Where? Comments available upon request. C. Please list specific neighborhood pedestrian issues below (e.g. crossing adjacent busy roadways, etc.). Comments available upon request. VI. Traffic Management: A. Do you feel your neighborhood or roadway has any traffic issues? 42 Yes 85 No B. If yes, where is it and where does it occur? Comments available upon request. 2 of 2 November 30, 2010 City of Edina RE: Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Improvements Dear Resident: The City of Edina has initiated the process of roadway and utility improvements for the summer of 2011 for your neighborhood. As part of the public improvement process the City held an open house on September 20, 2010 to discuss a typical roadway reconstruction project. The next step is to hold an informational meeting to discuss the improvements more specifically to your neighborhood. We are hosting an information meeting for the Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood on December 9, 2010 at 7:00 p.m. in the new Public Works and Park Maintenance Facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. The meeting will consist of a 20 minute presentation that will cover such things as work to be done, estimated project costs, estimated proposed assessment, etc. followed by a short question and answer period. A public hearing is tentatively set for January 4, 2011. You will be notified of the exact date, time and location of the hearing. If you can not attend this open house and would like additional information please contact the Engineering Department at 952 - 826 -0371. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SEH ATTENDANCE ROSTER Re: Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Edina, MN Project Manager: Paul J.Pasko III, PE Date of Meeting: Time of Meeting: Location of Meeting: SEH No.: 12/09/10 7:00 PM. Edina Public Works Facility EDINA 113734 _lAvOe- 9.5 .00 Name Address Lawn Pet Sump Irrigation Containment Pumps S stem S stem f 41V O Yes O Yes O Yes j3c v�C c 4k)-AW11 R No -,V No 'No Yes O Yes O Yes W� O No No 19�No .t' O Yes 'Q No O Yes ® No O Yes � No l , . �5�� (v es`�� • O-Yes O No =Yes O No X7es O No O Yes O Yes O Yes O No O No O No A • (fly �4' Jo � � � � � D�� r O Yes O Yes O Yes O No O No O No , 1,/� y' S e i S ��� % et��6 O Yes O Yes XR-Yes C"O _9�­No O No ,q Yes O Yes WYes fAqr 11 vt �ey ►,.e S de O No ,� No O No O Yes WNo O Yes R'No Yes O No _ f&,l U�{aT�f.<JS 560 O Yes es es O-No 13 No 0 No -A NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING SEH ATTENDANCE ROSTER Re: Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements Edina, MN Project Manager: Paul J.Pasko III, PE Date of Meeting: Time of Meeting: Location of Meeting: SEH No.: 12/09/10 7:00 PM Edina Public Works Facility EDINA 113734 94'60 Name Address Lawn Pet Sump Irrigation Containment Pumps System System O Yes X No O Yes No Yes O No "K O Yes O Yes Yes ru.=0� JN O'No (9" No O No F-1 -e5�C -- O Yes O Yes 'O�No O Yes f av �� 'QNo 'O�No L/1 s o Y O Yes O Yes O Yes 1-lr✓ �� idl�L No No No OQ Yes O Yes O Yes O No No M No O Yes O Yes O Yes O No O No O No O Yes O Yes O Yes O No O No O No O Yes 0 =. Yes O Yes O No O No O No O Yes O Yes O Yes 0 N 0 N 0 N O Yes Cl Yes O Yes O No O No O No i. J SEH MEMORANDUM TO: City of Edina FROM: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. DATE: December 10, 2010 RE: Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements — List of Questions asked by Residents at the December 9, 2010 Informational Meeting SEH No. EDINA 113734 93.00 1. It was repeated throughout the presentation `if the project moves forward'. Isn't this a formality? What are the chances that the project doesn't move forward? 2. Why is this project's assessment rate so much higher than previous City projects? 3. How could it cost the same to repair the sanitary sewer service pipe from the trunk main to the house compared to repairing it from the trunk main to the right -of -way line? 4. Can I consider repairing my sanitary sewer service pipe from the sanitary sewer trunk main to the right -of -way line now and later repair the sanitary sewer service pipe from the right -of -way line to the house? 5. Why is the City considering the sanitary sewer service program in this neighborhood? Don't we have fewer trees and subsequent root issues than the Country Club neighborhood? 6. How much damage will occur to trees next to the road? 7. What are the penalties to the Contractor for damaging the trees? 8. How long is a typical phase of construction? Which phase of the project will go first? 9. How will water and sanitary sewer services be repaired? Open cut or trenchless? 10. Are there trenchless options to repair the water service pipe from the curb stop to the house? 11. Is there a benefit for the neighbors to band together to hire a plumber to reconstruct sanitary sewer services? 12. Are the proposed assessments tax deductable? 13. What is the warranty regarding driveways? If I have a higher quality driveway apron than what the City is proposing to put in, will the City put in the higher quality version? 14. What is the limit of boulevard restoration due to street reconstruction? What is the limit of boulevard restoration due to water service pipe reconstruction? What is the limit of boulevard restoration due to sanitary sewer service reconstruction? 15. Whose cost is it to connect a sump pump to the City's sump drain pipe? 16. What happens to private landscaping in the street reconstruction limits? 17. What do you expect construction prices to be this spring? tm c: p:\ae\e\edina \113734 \5final\feasibility report\appendix\neighb mtg res questions.do" Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 200, Minnetonka, MN 55343 -9301 SEH is an equal opportunity employer I www.sehinc.com 1 952.912.2600 1 800.734.6757 1 952.912.2601 fax GONE, Trenchless Methods for Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe Trenchless Methods for Water Service Pipe S E H City of Edina 2011 Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Improvements Open House Plumbers Questionnaire Summary December 9, 2010 Revisions: 2/28/08 Updated Information based on 2115/08 Meeting w/ Plumbers. P•1 AMMF :,11na111'{7- 1AV1M— f%F— ;h1ily R—i—1 7 77 nA A-1ghnnF1 DISCLAIMER: The City of Edina does not endorse any contractor listed on this list. The list is being provided to you only as a beginning reference in your search for a contractor. This list was created in 2005 and revised Feb. 2008. Trenchless Methods for Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe Trenchless Methods for Water Service Pipe Reconstruction Reconstruction Contact Information Private Service Pipe Cured In Pipe Directional Reconstruction Slip Line Place Pipe Bursting Other Trenchless Drilling Contractor Services Method Method Method Methods Method Other Trenchless Methods Contact Name Day Phone Email Address Carl Bolander & Sons Yes Yes No Yes Yes - Pilot Tube Yes Jeff Fye 651.224.6299 iefffve(ftolander.com Gavic & Sons Plumbing Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes - Directional Drilling Yes Tunneling w/ Pneumatic Paul Gavic 612.867.9959 poavic(a)amail.com and Pilot Tube Pullback Gopher. With pipe bursting equipment can pull water service at same time. Gene's Water & Sewer Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes - Drop hole - tunnel Yes Drop hole - tunnel Craig Peterson 612. 781.3737 www.aeneswaterandsewer.co Highview Plumbing Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Drop hole - tunnel Yes Drop hole - tunnel Dan Swanson 612.916.0444 hiahplma(Maol.com Jeche Excavating Yes Yes No No No No Gopher, Tunnel, Directional Bob Jeche 612.720.7456 K's Mechanical Yes No Yes No No NUMA Gopher or Directional Dave 763.441.8066 Born Mpls & Suburban S &W Yes Yes Currently No Yes - Directional Drilling Yes Handtunneling, underground Kevin Hoyhtya 612.861.6076 khoyt @aol.com, looking into it and Pilot Tube. Pullback piercing tool (Gopher) MSSWINC @aol.com Mr Rooter Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes - Directional Drilling Horizontal Directional Boring Jugal 612.328.0383 iuoai.aaarwalCa�gmail.com and Pilot Tube Pullback Nova Frost, Inc. Yes Yes No Yes Yes - Directional Drilling Yes Tunneling Michael Frost 651.480.8575 novafrost@earthlink.net Olson Construction Yes No No Yes - Directional Drilling Yes Ron Olson 952.448.6674 and Pilot Tube Pullback P.R.S. Mechanical, Inc. Yes Yes Yes Yes - Directional Drilling Yes Reg Crawford 651.633.6890 PRSmech @hotmail.com and Pilot Tube Pullback Parrott Contracting, Inc. Yes Yes No No Yes - Directional Drilling Yes Directional Boring Dave Parrott 507.248.9697 dparrott(a)frontiemet.net and Pilot Tube Pullback Plumbing Services, Inc. Yes No No No No No Mike Nally 763.783.9080 Ridgedale Plumbing No Gary Zwieg 612.817.8776 gkmswiea(cDaol.com Richfield Plumbing Co. Yes Yes No No Yes - Directional Drilling Yes Pneumatic Gopher Bob Adelmann 612.919.1381 service richfieldplumbina.com Roto Rooter Services Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes - Directional Drilling Yes With pipe bursting equipment David Skallet 763.519.3928 David.skallet(c-D-rsc.com can pull water service at same Blaine Weiss 763.286.8291 time. Sunset Construction Inc. Yes Yes Yes Yes - Directional drilling, Yes Pit launched directional drilling, Bob Frovarp 612.701.9739 pit launched red pusher, pit launched red pusher, or vacuum boring vacuum boring 763.479.1044 Thompson Plumbing Yes No No No Yes - Directional Drilling No Directional Boring Keith Gause 952.933.7717 keith anthomosonplumbina.net Westonka Mechanical Yes Yes Yes Yes The yes answers above No Brian Clark 612.741.9779 are done by us and subcontractors. �otNw.L�4 �� ��� SEH City of Edina 2011 Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Improvements Improvement No. BA334 Preliminary Assessment Roll 9/14/2010 Revisions: 10126110 update REU and assessable properties, 1124110 update assessment rates PA MMEalna111373414PreWsessmenPTm1 Assessmwt .Asx)A sessmeM Vr PID Taxpayers Name Street # Street Taxpayer Address Taxpayer City St ZIP Street Reconstruction Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe between Trunk Pipe and Right-of-Way Line Estimated Total Assessment Rate 1902824120016 STEVEN W RIDER & MARY C RIDER 5400 BROOKVIEW AVE 5400 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120017 DAVID G STOLPESTAD & CHRISTINA L STOLPESTAD 5404 BROOKVIEW AVE 5404 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120018 SUSAN E G OLSON & RICHARD J OLSON 5408 BROOKVIEW AVE 5408 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120019 TAMARA L RICHARDSON & JONAS A RUNOUIST 5412 IBROOKVIEWAVE 5412 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 11,800.001 $4,500.00 $16 300.00 1902824120020 CONRAD LEIFUR 5416 BROOKVIEW AVE 5416 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 11.800.001 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120015 ROSEMARY SIEVE & LORAS SIEVE 5417 BROOKVIEW AVE 5417 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120021 GERALDINE A NIEBUHR & FREDERICK W NIEBUHR 5420 BROOKVIEW AVE 5420 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120014 PENNY A TYSON &MARK A TYSON 5421 BROOKVIEW AVE 5421.13ROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120022 JODY L SWANSON ROSS & DALE R ROSS 5424 BROOKVIEW AVE 5424 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120013, LIESBETH K NERHEIM & ELDON NERHEIM 5425 BROOKVIEW AVE. 5425 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120023 CONNIE L GRADY 5428 BROOKVIEW AVE 5428 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120012 - BRIAN PANKRATZ & ALYSSA PANKRATZ 5429 BROOKVIEW AVE 5429 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4 500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120024 JOHN ,F BLOODSWORTH &DIANE G HEACOX 5432 BROOKVIEW AVE 5432 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120011 CATHERINE W BELL 5433 BROOKVIEW AVE' 5433 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11 ",800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120025 STEVEN K LEE & CONRAD F MEYER WEG 1 5436 BROOKVIEW AVE CH -8700 KUSNACHT (ZH) SWITZERLAND $1.1,800.00 $4,5Q0.00 $16,300.00 1902824120010 EUGENE PETERSEN & EDNA PETERSEN 5437 BROOKVIEW AVE 5437" BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120115 BRUCE A MACHMEIER & 5500 BROOKVIEW AVE 5500 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11' 800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120157 LINDA J DOUGHTY & BRIAN J DOUGHTY 5501 BROOKVIEW AVE 5501 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11'800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120116 TRACY K LANGEVIN & TODD R LANGEVIN 5504 BROOKVIEW AVE 5504 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120156 STEVEN D BRYAN & NATALIE S SYNHAIVSKY 5505 BROOKVIEW AVE 5505 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120117 SHERYL BARE & ROBERT KIRK 5508 BROOKVIEW AVE 5508 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 11.800.001 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120155 KATHLEEN M BUEGLER/TRUSTEE 5509 BROOKVIEW AVE 5509 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $1.1,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120118 CASSIDY R STEINER & "ANDREW G STEINER 5512 BROOKVIEW AVE 5512 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINNMN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120154 ELIZABETH M JOHNSON . 5513 BROOKVIEW AVE 5513 8ROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4 500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120119 WILLIAM M MEYER & TOBIE J MEYER 5516 BROOKVIEW AVE 5516 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4.500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120153 THOMAS A GARTON & RACHEL B GARTON 5517 BROOKVIEW AVE 5517. BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120120 JOANNE M NOVAK 5520 BROOKVIEW AVE 5520 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120152 THOMAS E FISCHER & BARBARA J FISCHER 5521 BROOKVIEW AVE 5521 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424. $11,800.00. $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120121 ROBERT A PECK & LISA E PECK 5524 BROOKVIEW AVE 5524 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 11'.800.001 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120151 TRICIA T CLARKE & DONALD E CLARKE 5525 BROOKVIEW AVE" 5525 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11.800.001 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120122 JAMES W.STANGL & BRIDGET.A STANGL 5528 BROOKVIEW AVE 5528 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120150 JOHN KELLOGG & CHRISTINE KELLOGG 5529 BROOKVIEW AVE 5529 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4.500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120123 JOHN C STEPHENSON & ELIZABETH M STEPHENSON 5532 BROOKVIEW AVE 5532 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120149 MICHAEL S TRESSLER & ANNE E TRESSLER 5533 1BROOKVIEWAVE 5533 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 _ $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824110090 MARK G SWENSON & MARCY G SWENSON 5501 1 DEVER DR 5501 DEVER DR EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824110081 SARAH M SPENCE & KENNETH F SPENCE III' 5504 DEVER DR 5504 DEVER DR EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824110089 ELIZABETH F BARNETT & ANDREW WRIGHT 5505 DEVER DR - 5505 DEVER DR EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 -$4,500.00 $16 300.00 1902824110082 HAROLD D COVLIN & BEVERLEY B COVLIN 5508 DEVER DR 5508 DEVER DR EDINA MN 55424. $11 800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824110088 MICHAEL J CALVO & AMY R SCOTT 5509 DEVER DR 5509 DEVER DR EDINA MN 55424 $11 600.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824110087 JUSTIN A WAHLS & ANNA L WAHLS 5513 DEVER DR 5513 DEVER DR EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824110106 SCOTT A CARD 8 JULIE W CARD 5517 DEVER DR 15517 DEVER DR I EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.001 $4,500.001 $16,300.001 Page 1 of 4 PID Taxpayers Name Street # Street Taxpayer Address Taxpayer CI St ZIP Street Reconstruction Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe between Trunk Pipe and Right-of-Way Line - Estimated Total Assessment Rate 1902824110103 NANCY J CAVEN 5521 DEVER DR 5521 DEVER OR EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120055 GREG J HERNANDEZ & ANNA L HERNANDEZ 5400 KELLOGG AVE 5400 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120054 KATHRYN E KOESSEL 5401 KELLOGG AVE 5401 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120056 1 MELANIE SHERMAN & KEITH SHERMAN 5404 KELLOGG AVE 5404 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 500.001 $16,300.00 1902824120053 SANDRA E ROSS & RICHARD A ROSS 5405 KELLOGG AVE 5405 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11'800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120057 WILLIAM E MCDONALD & MARYAN M MCDONALD 5408 KELLOGG AVE 5408 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800:00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120052 PATRICK E FLANAGAN 5409 KELLOGG AVE 5409 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120058 REBECCA MCCAUGHEY & MARK MCCAUGHEY 5412 KELLOGG AVE 5412 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120051 RICHARD J SHEEHAN & ELIZABETH A SHEEHAN 5413 KELLOGG AVE 5413 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120059 TRACY L HOLTAN 5416 KELLOGG AVE 5416 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120050 SUZY S KRONFELD BAUM & DAVID R BAUM 5417 KELLOGG AVE 5417 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 11,800.001 $4,500.00 $16 300.00 1902824120060 SARAH PARRY & DAVID G PARRY 5420 KELLOGG AVE 5420 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4 500.00 $18 300.00 1902824120049 JOHANNA M ZAVORAL & JAMES H ZAVORAL 5421 KELLOGG AVE 5421 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120061 DORIS ANDERSON & BYRON ANDERSON 5424 KELLOGG AVE 5424 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120048 PATRICK T LEE & ANGELA L LEE 5425 KELLOGG AVE 5425 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16 300.00 1902824120082 THOMAS C BERINGER & CATHERINE C BERINGER 5428 KELLOGG AVE 5428 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120083 WILLIAM R LUNGER & LAURA A LUNGER 5432 KELLOGG AVE 5432 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120047 FERDINANDA L OTNESS 5433 KELLOGG AVE 5433 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120064 LOREN L TAYLOR & KAREN R TAYLOR 5436 KELLOGG AVE - 5436 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120046 MARK T SULLIVAN & JULIE G SULLIVAN 5437 KELLOGG AVE 5437 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120075 ROBERT J HEST & COOKIE H COLEMAN 5500- KELLOGG AVE 5500 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120114 JASON CONWAY & ELIZABETH CONWAY 5501 KELLOGG AVE 5501 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120076 NANCY K CARLILE & CHRISTOPHER S CARLILE 5504 KELLOGG AVE 5504 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120113 BHARAT CHARAN 5505 KELLOGG AVE 5505 KELLOGG AVE, EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120077 MARY E KOTTKE 5508 KELLOGG AVE 5508 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4.500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120112 GAIL M COLLINS '5509 KELLOGG'AVE 5509 KELLOGGAVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120078 BRUCE C RUSSELL 5512 IKELLOGGAVE 5512 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 -$11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120111 KATHRYN A MERTZ & DONALD K MERTZ 5513 KELLOGG AVE 5513 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16 300.00 1902824120079 JON L OTTERLEI 5516 KELLOGG AVE 7121 SCHEY DRIVE EDINA MN 55439 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120110 DANIEL J GIONET & ANDREA S GIONET 5517 KELLOGG AVE 5517 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120080 CAROLYN R COCHRANE & ANDREW S COCHRANE 5520 KELLOGG AVE 5520 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120109 NICHOLAS J SOLINGER & LISA L SOLINGER 5521 KELLOGG AVE 5521 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120081 SARAH J GRIFFIN & GREGORY J PFLASTER 5524 KELLOGG AVE 5524 KELLOGG AVE - EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120108 RUTH K PLOTNICKY 5525 KELLOGG AVE 5525 KELLOGG AVE EDINAMN 55424 $11,800.00 .500.001 $16,300.00 1902824120082 REED R CHRISTIANSON & LISA M CHRISTIANSON 5528 KELLOGG AVE 5528 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120107 MARGARET R WINTERS 5529 KELLOGG AVE 5529 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16 300.00 1902824120083 MARY ELLEN BRATTLAND & GARY LEE BRATTLAND 5532 KELLOGG AVE 5532 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120106 CHRISTINE M REIERSGORD & CARL E REIERSGORD 5533 KELLOGG AVE 5533 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120084 JOANNE MCRAE 5536 KELLOGG AVE 5536 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120105 DIANE N SPANGLER & DAVID R SPANGLER 5537 KELLOGG AVE 5537 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824130070 PAMELA E SCHWIER & JAMES G SCHWIER 5600 KELLOGG PL 5600 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824130062 IDONA M DARKENWALD & CLEMENT B DARKENWALD 5601 KELLOGG PL 5601 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824130069 JACKIE K DUMMER & DALE M DUMMER 5604 KELLOGG PL 5604 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824130063 ROBERT J DALY & KAREN E DALY 5605 KELLOGG PL 5605 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.0 $16,300.00 1902824130068 ANDREW C TEITSCHEID & AMY J TEITSCHEID 5608 KELLOGG PL 5608 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824130067 SALLY A LAREAU & DONALD E LAREAU 5612 KELLOGG PL 5612 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824130066 ELWOOD MCVEETY 5616 KELLOGG PL 5616 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 $11;800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824130065 CHRISTINE A VAN DONEN 5620 KELLOGG PL 5620 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824130061 SCOTT D ASPENSON & AMANDA K ASPENSON 5625 KELLOGG PL 5625 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824130064 TODD S EMERSON & AADRA M 0 EMERSON 5628 KELLOGG PL 5628 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120036 THOMAS K BROWER & PETRA S BROWER 5400 OAKLAWN AVE 5400 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.0 $16,300.00 1902824120035 JEAN D COLWELL & BRYAN D COLWELL 5401 IOAKLAWN AVE 5401 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120037 RONALD L KALIEBE & CAROL B FLINT - KALIEBE 5404 OAKLAWN AVE 5404 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120034 MARY L DYKSTRA & DENNIS D DYKSTRA 5405 OAKLAWN AVE 5405 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 111.800.001 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120038 JOHN R CRABTREE 5408 OAKLAWN AVE 5408 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120033 ROCKY B OSBORN & JENNIFER A OSBORN 5409 OAKLAWN AVE 5409 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120039 GLORIA L SULLIVAN & DANIEL B SULLIVAN 5412 OAKLAWN AVE 5412 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11',800.00 $4,500.001 $16,300.00 1902824120032 KATHRYN A BENNETT & EDWARD L BENNETT 5413 OAKLAWN AVE 5413 OAKLAWN AVE - EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16 300.00 1902824120040 LOU ANN GILBERT 5416 OAKLAWN AVE 5416 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16 300.. t r PID Taxpayers Name Street # Street Taxpayer Address Taxpayer CI St ZIP Street Reconstruction Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe between Trunk Pipe and Right-of-Way Right-of-Way Line Estimated Total Assessment Rate 1902824120031 MICHAEL K SUTLEY 5417 OAKLAWN AVE 6406 TIMBER RIDGE EDINA MN 55439 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120041 RODNEY G THOLE & CAROL J THOLE 5420 OAKLAWN AVE 2901 MASTERS CIR PLANO TX 75093 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120030 SAMUEL PACE & DORIS K PACE 5421 OAKLAWN AVE 5421 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4 500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120042 MARJORIE A ADLER 5424 1OAKLAWN AVE 5424 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16 300.00 1902824120029 LAVONNE FREDRICKSON 5425 OAKLAWN AVE 5425 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120043 STEVEN L SEVERSON & SARA E SEVERSON 5426 OAKLAWN AVE 5428 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120028 MARIA K EGGEMEYER 5429 OAKLAWN AVE 5429 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120044 JOHN FALLDIN 5432 OAKLAWN AVE 5432 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120027 ROBERT ENGER & MAUREEN 0 ENGER 5433 OAKLAWN AVE 5433 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120045 STEVEN L THAYER 5436 OAKLAWN AVE 5436 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120026 NANCY H KING & DOUGLAS E KING 5437 OAKLAWN AVE 5437 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4 500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120095 GORDON K HILLEQUE & EMILY ERUSHA HILLEQUE 5500 OAKLAWN AVE 5500 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4 .500.001 16 300.00 1902824120134 RICHARD W WEIGEL & MARY J WEIGEL 5501 OAKLAWN AVE 5501 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120096 VINCENT P BARRETT & LYNN S BARRETT 5504 OAKLAWN AVE 5504 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11&222 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120133 KELLY INGVALDSON & ERIC INGVALDSON 5505 OAKLAWN AVE 5505 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120097 WALTER OSTROM & ROBERTA OSTROM 5508 OAKLAWN AVE 5508 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120132 SUSAN L MORK & MICHAEL D WHITTLEF 5509 OAKLAWN AVE 5509 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11 800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120098 WILLIAM H KELLY & CARYN E KELLY 5512 OAKLAWN AVE 5512 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120131 MICHAEL MILO & CELESTE G MILO 5513 OAKLAWN AVE 5513 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4 500.00 $16 300.00 1902824120099 CAROLYN DONNELLY 5516 OAKLAWN AVE 5516 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16 300.00 1902824120130 LISA L CARVER & JONATHAN A CARVER 5517 OAKLAWN AVE 5517 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120100 JOSEPHINE BAUER &BENJAMIN BAUER 5520 OAKLAWN AVE 5520 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120129 KARI F SCHOOLER & DAVID A SCHOOLER 5521 OAKLAWN AVE 5521 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120101 THOMAS P DAVIS & BRIDGET W DAVIS 5524 OAKLAWN AVE 5524 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4 500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120128 HEIDI V WENNEN & DARREN J.WENNEN 5525 OAKLAWN AVE 5525 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120102 GINA M DIERFELDT 5528 OAKLAWN AVE 3550 WOODLAND CT EAGAN MN 55123 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120127 CHRISTOPER C LONG 5529 OAKLAWN AVE 5529 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4.500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120103 HARRIET E BUSDICKER 5532 OAKLAWN AVE 5532 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120126 BRIAN A BELANGER 5533 OAKLAWN AVE 5533 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120104 PETER R ZIRBEL & CATHY L REED 5536 OAKLAWN AVE 5536 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120125 ROBERT H DALY & LAURA Z DALY 5537 OAKLAWN AVE 5537 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824130060 RAYMOND J BOOK & JULIE A PARKE 5600 OAKLAWN AVE 5600 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824130001 PATRICIA M VAYDA & DOUGLAS W VAYDA 5601 OAKLAWN AVE 5601 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824130002 TERRY PUCKETT & JENNIFER SWEETSER - PUCKETT 5609 OAKLAWN AVE 5609 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 -$11,8()0.00 $4 500.00 $16,300.00 1902824130003 JAMES D ALT & DEBORAH K MCKNIGHT 5617 OAKLAWN AVE 5617 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00, $16 300.00 1902824120001 JOANNE S GORSKI- ALKIRE & DAVID ALKIRE 5400 PARK PLACE 5400 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4L500.00 $18 300.00 1902824120002 PAUL J SHLAFER & BARBARA S SHLAFER 5404 PARK PLACE • 5404 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120003 RUSSELL B STRONG & KIMBERLY S STRONG 5412 PARK PLACE 5412 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120004 JAMES TRIGGS & CATHERINE TRIGGS 5416 PARK PLACE 5416 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $11 800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120005 TANYA SKANSE & RONALD SKANSE 5420 PARK PLACE 5420 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120006 SCOTT R DORN &ELIZABETH A DORN 5424 PARK PLACE 5424 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120007 PATRICIA STEWART & JEFFREY 0 STEWART 5428 PARK PLACE 5428 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824110073 LISA C BALKE & JEFFREY A BALKE 5429 PARK PLACE 5429 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120008 PATRICK M KRISKE & CATHERINE G KRISKE 5432 PARK PLACE 5432 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $11.800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120009 JOHN B MOONEY & JOAN M MOONEY 5436 PARK PLACE 5436 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $11.800.00 $4,500.00 - $16,300.00 1902824110074 KATHLEEN M FLESHER 5437 PARK PLACE 5437 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4.500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120138 DAVID L TURK 5500 PARK PLACE 5500 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 11 =0.00I $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824110011 MARK R BIRCHARD 5501 PARK PLACE 5501 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4.500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120139 TODD L WEIKLE & JILL WEIKLE 5504 PARK PLACE 5504 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120140 EUGENE N BALE 5508 PARK PLACE 5508 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824110012' CATHERINE R BRIGGS 5509 PARK PLACE 5509 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00. $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120141 SHARON E BROWN & ANDREW R BROWN 5512 PARK PLACE 5512 PARK PLACE EDINA MN 55410 $1,1,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824110013 LORI C GROTZ & JAMES R GROTZ 5513 PARK PLACE 5513 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120142 LAURENCE LOMAX & BARBARA L WENDT 5516 PARK PLACE 5516 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120143 WILLIAM B STAHL & SUSAN E WALKER 5520 PARK PLACE 5520 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $11, 800.00 $4, $16,300.00 1902824110052. RODNEY D TEACHOUT 8 KATHLEEN K TEACHOUT 5523 PARK PLACE 5523 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $11 800.00 $4 500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120144 MICHELE ,B BRUNNING & ANDREW G WAY 5524. PARK PLACE 5524 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4 500.00 $18 300.00 1902824110053 SARA E SWANSON 5527 PARK PLACE 5527 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120145 WILLIAM E HIDDING 15528 1 PARK PLACE 5528 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $11 800.00 $4,500.00 $18,300.00 Page 3 of 4 PID Taxpayers Name Street # Street Taxpayer Address Taxpayer CI St ZIP Street Reconstruction Sanitary Sewer Service Pipe between Trunk Pipe and Right-of-Way Line Estimated Total Assessment Rate 1902824120146 SUSAN V KLEVEN & BRUCE 'M KLEVEN 5532 PARK PLACE 5532 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824110054 MARK G BUSYN . 5533 PARK PLACE 5533 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824120147 MIA M LIEBL & DAVID M LIEBL 5536 PARK PLACE 5536 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824110055 DANNY LEE EIDSON 5537 PARK PLACE 5537 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824140052 LAURA L R HEMLER & DAVID M HEMLER 5601 PARK PLACE 5601 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 $3,935.00 $0.00 $3,935.00 1902824110064 THOMAS W VON- KUSTER JR & MARY S VON - KUSTER 5413 WOODCREST OR 5413 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $11800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824110065 ROBIN J CARPENTER 5417 WOODCREST DR 5417 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824110075 PAMELA E KEARNEY & JEREMIAH J KEARNEY 5420 WOODCREST DR 5420 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00. $16,300.00 1902824110066 RICHARD WEIGEL & ELIZABETH W WEIGEL 5421 WOODCREST DR 5421 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824110067 LISA J RAMSAY & DAVID C RAMSAY 5425 WOODCREST DR 5425 WOODCREST OR EDINA "MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824110068 JAMES E STEFFEN & CARLA C C STEFFEN 5427 WOODCREST DR 5427 WOODCREST OR EDINA MN 55424 $11 800.00 $4 500.00 $16,300.00 1902824110105 SUSAN L CRABTREE & BENJAMIN CRABTREE 5428 WOODCREST DR 5426 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $11.800.00 4.500.001 $16,300.00 1902824110069 MARK A BRETHEIM & JENNY L BRETHEIM 5429 WOODCREST DR 5429 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824110079 SARAH B MAENNER & PAUL H MAENNER 5432 WOODCREST DR 5432 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 .$11"800.00 $4,500.00 - $16,300.00 1902824110070 PETER MICHIELUTTI & LYNDA R MICHIELUTTI 5433 WOODCREST DR 5433 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824110107 BRENDA B BECKER 5437 WOODCREST DR 5437 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4300.00 $16,300.00 1902824110080 MARK K BORDEN & JANE S BORDEN 5440 WOODCREST DR 5440 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424, $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824110108 ROBERT J MURNEY JR & JANE J OH 5441 WOODCREST DR 5441 WOODCREST DR .- EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824110083 MARK D LANZ & KAREN L LANZ 5500 WOODCREST DR 5500 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 - 11.800.001 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824110092 JAMES B ROTH & DEEPALI ROTH 5501, WOODCREST DR 5501 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $11 800.00 $4 500.00 $16,300.00 1902824110084 SARAH A ERICKSON & RYAN M ERICKSON 5504 WOODCREST DR 5504 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 -$11 800.00 $4.500.001 $16,300.00 1902824110093 LYNNE P ROHKOHL & JAY D ROHKOHL 5505 WOODCREST DR 5505 WOODCREST;DR EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4500.00 $16,300.00 1902824110085 BRENDA S OLSON 5508 WOODCREST DR 5508 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $11 800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824110094 STANLEY E DAMS 5509 ° ' WOODCREST DR 5509 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4 500.00 $18 300.00 1902824110086 VICKIE L ROBERTS & JAMES LROBERTS 5512 WOODCREST DR 5512 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824110056 JUDITH J CARVER 5515 WOODCREST DR 5515 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824110059 STEVEN E KLOS & ELLEN J KLOS 5516 WOODCREST DR 5516 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16300.00 1902824110057 STAN GEYER & BEVERLY L GEYER & ANNIE E GREGORAK 5517 WOODCREST DR 5517 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824110060 JAMES W ROCKWELL-& HELEN E ROCKWELL 5520 WOODCREST DR 5520 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 -$11 600.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824110058 JAMES R'CAMPBELL & CARMEN D CAMPBELL 5521 WOODCREST DR 5521 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824110061 KENNETH OLSON & JANET A OLSON 5524 IWOODCREST DR 100 N COLLIER BLVD MARCO ISLAND FL 33937 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $18 300.00 1902824140048 ILEONARD A NELSON & GRACE NELSON 5525 WOODCREST DR 5525 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $11,800.00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824110062 THOMAS J RAIH & MOLLIE M RAIH 5528 WOODCREST DR 5528 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $11,800:00 $4,500.00 $16,300.00 1902824140049 IMARKWSHEFFERT 5600 IWOODCREST DR 5600 WOODCREST DR I EDINA MN 55424 ; $3 935:00 $0.00 $3,935.00 1902824140053 ROBERT J OWEN & JUDITH K OWEN 5601 WOODCREST DR 5601 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 $3.935.00 $0.00 $3,935.00 i !t' o e � may° • t�roRPOW'��/ 1888 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.K . From: Debra Mangen Action City Clerk F-1 Discussion ❑ Information Date: December 21, 2010 Subject: Reappointments: Art Center Board, Construction Board of Appeals And Park Board ACTION REQUESTED: Motion reappointing the persons listed below to terms beginning February 1, 2011. Info /Background: In November the Council made the majority of their reappointments, but we had three members who had outstanding applications. The last of the applications was received so the final three reappointments can now be made. The following individuals have expressed a willingness to be reappointed to their respective board, commission or committee. All are eligible to be reappointed with respect to term limits and attendance requirements where applicable: Art Center Board John Swon Construction Board of Appeals Edward Schwartzbauer Park Board Rob Presthus V t-i<A. o Le m less REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.L. From: John Wallin Finance Director ® Action Discussion Information Date: December 21, 2010 Subject: Resolution No. 2010 -125 Special Assessment Corrections ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution 2010 -125. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The Special Assessment notices are sent to property owners notifying them of the proposed special assessment and instructing them that prepayments should be sent to the Assessing Department. Several property owners included payment of their street reconstruction and aquatic weed special assessments with their utility bills. The payments were made by the deadline date but were not caught until after the assessments had been certified to Hennepin County. The first three properties listed on the attached resolution were paid electronically and included with the daily electronic file that is received for utility payments. The last two payments were received by utility billing by check. Since these payments were received by the deadline date the assessment should be cancelled. Hennepin County now requires the cancellation be done by Council Resolution. City staff will put procedures in place to better identify these payments so in the future they can be cancelled before being certified to the County. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2010 -125 RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -125 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CANCELLATION OF CERTAIN SPECIALASSESSMENTS TO THE HENNEPIN COUNTY AUDITOR WHEREAS, the Edina City Council duly adopted resolutions at their October 5 and October 19 City Council meetings where numerous special assessments were levied for a number of projects. WHEREAS, the notice each property owner received included instruction for prepayment of the special assessment to the Assessing Dept. 4801 W 50th St., Edina, MN 55424 WHEREAS, several payments were received prior to the November 30 deadline however payments were received as part of utility payments and not allocated against the appropriate special assessment until after the special assessment had been certified to Hennepin County. WHEREAS, Hennepin County now states that when taxing authorities seek to abate a special assessment that has been certified they must do so by action of the entity that has the authority to impose the tax, or by a board responsible for reviewing abatement and reduction of special assessments as contemplated by MN Statute Section 270C.86 Subd. 1. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall transmit a certified duplicate copy of this resolution and the list of special assessment corrections to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax list of the County. The list of the special assessment correction is: PID NAME ADDRESS AMOUNT 1802824130112 Randy Harrison 4631 Arden Ave $11,468.98 1902824310057 Kirk Johnson 5844 St. Johns Ave $6,923.84 0611621220014 Douglas Fincham 6409 McCauley Cir $445.81 0611621210068 Steven Kumagai 6327 Timber Trl $445.81 0611621240009 Daniel Wolfe 6520 Indian Hills Rd $445.81 Passed and adopted by the City Council on December 21, 2010. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 21, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 120 City Clerk -. 0 Vu •lam u • \`bye REPORT /RECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: IV.M. From: Boyd Tate Traffic Safety Coordinator ® Action Discussion Information Date: December 21, 2010 Subject: Traffic Safety Report of December 1, 2010. ACTION REQUESTED: Review and approve Traffic Safety Staff Review of Wednesday, November 3, 2010. BACKGROUND: It is not anticipated that residents will be in attendance at the Council meeting regarding any of the attached issues. ATTACHMENTS: Traffic Safety Review for December 1, 2010. t TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW Wednesday, December 1, 2010 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on December 1, 2010. Staff present included the City Engineer, Assistant City Engineer, City Planner, outgoing Traffic Sergeant, incoming Traffic Sergeant, Traffic Safety Coordinator and Sign Coordinator. From that review, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were also informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the December 21, 2010, Council Agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which staff recommends approval of request: 1. Request to post "No Parking" signs on South View Lane between the entrance and exit of the parking lot located between the Community Center and South View Middle School. This request comes from the staff of South View Middle School who is working with City staff to make changes in the area to make pedestrian traffic safer. The area in question has room for only three vehicles to park. School staff feels that eliminating parking in this area would improve the sight lines for vehicles exiting this parking lot. South View Lane is a "Collector" street with an average Monday -Friday traffic count of 4,403 and an 85h-percentile speed of 28.1 mph. There have been 4 reported accidents on South View Lane between Normandale Road and Concord Avenue from 2001 -2009 (3 property damage and 1 possible injury). Staff believes that eliminating street parking in this area would improve the sight line for vehicles using this lot. Staff feels that posting signs that read "No Parking/Standing/Waiting Anytime" would eliminate parents from waiting in this area when picking up children. Traffic Safety Staff Review December 1, 2010 Page 1 of 4 f. Staff recommends the approval of the request to post "No Parkin&Standing7Waiting Anytime" signs in the area between the entrance /exit of the parking lot located on South View Lane between the Community Center and South View Middle School. 2. Request to install temporary "No Parking" signs along both sides of Parklawn Avenue from Edinborough Way, west to the bridge crossing Centennial Lakes. This request comes from a resident on Coventry Lane who is concerned about all of the construction vehicles that are parking on the south side of Parklawn Avenue in the east bound driving lane. Requestor states that east bound drivers are turning the corner over the bridge only to .find that the driving lane is blocked by parked vehicles. Requestor states that he has witnessed several near accidents in this area. A large construction project is taking place on the south west quadrant of York Avenue and Parklawn Avenue. This project is scheduled to be completed in the spring of 2011. The project manager states that at any given time there, are between 100 -150 workers on site. Workers are parking on Edinborough Way and on the south side of Parklawn Avenue. City staff has seen vehicles parked on Parklawn Avenue from Edinborough Way to the bridge over Centennial Lakes. The curve in the roadway at this location makes it impossible for east bound traffic to see that the lane is closed ahead. Snow events could pose a real problem in this area. Staff feels; that temporary no parking signs would alleviate the current hazard that now exists. Staff would like to have these temporary signs installed in a permanent fashion thus eliminating the constant need to change out the normal temporary signs throughout the rest of the winter. 3451 - Parklawn Avenue is completed 3. Request to install a "Yield" sign for east bound West 74th Street traffic at Xerxes Avenue and a "Stop" sign for south bound Xerxes Avenue traffic at West 75`h Street (Edina side of Xerxes Avenue). These requests come from the City of Richfield who has completed a new residential traffic sign policy. The residential stop sign policy assigns Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 2 of 4 December 1, 2010 right of way to all intersections in town by creating sub - collectors. Their request would bring the area into compliance with the rest of the City. The Traffic Safety Committee reviewed and denied this request at the September 2010 meeting based on lack of vehicle volume warrants per the City of Edina Stop Sign and Yield Sign Policies. This section of Xerxes Avenue has fewer than 250 vehicles per day and no reported crashes. These volumes are substantially lower than the City of Edina warrants. On September 25 2010, at its regular meeting, the City council requested that the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) review the request. Jeff Pearson of the City of Richfield presented their rationale to the ETC at its November 18, 2010 meeting. He explained that the two signs are consistent with the City of Richfield's Stop Sign Policy and enhance the safety of the pedestrian/bicycling infrastructure along the newly reconstructed 75th Street corridor. The Traffic Safety Committee's recommendation based on the city of Edina policies for stop signs and yield signs, does not meet warrants at these locations. However, the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) recommended approval of the "Yield" sign for east bound West 74th Street traffic at Xerxes Avenue and a "Stop" sign for south bound Xerxes Avenue traffic at West 75th Street (Edina side of Xerxes Avenue). of Xerxes Avenue) staff is recommending installing the signs. SECTION B: Requests on which staff recommends denial of request: Request for a "No Right Turn on Red" sign to be posted for north bound Metro Boulevard traffic at West 70' Street. This request comes from a City employee who witnessed a near accident at this location when an east bound vehicle nearly struck a north bound vehicle who was attempting to make a right turn off of Metro Boulevard into the child care center. North bound Metro Boulevard traffic has two driving lanes. East bound traffic on West 70th Street has three driving lanes (left turn only, left turn and through only, and a right turn only). A vehicle in the left turn and Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 3 of 4 December 1, 2010 ri. __• through only lane had the green light and was attempting to make a left turn and nearly struck the vehicle that was making a right turn on a red light off of Metro Boulevard into the child care center. Requestor feels that a "No Turn on Red" would eliminate this problem in the future. West 70`h Street and Metro Boulevard are both "Collector" streets. Metro Boulevard has an average daily traffic count of 6,164, vehicles with an 85"- percentile speed of 34.6 mph. West 70`h Street has an average daily traffic count of 9;049 vehicles with an .85`h- percentile speed, of 35.5 mph. There have been. 15 traffic accidents at this intersection, from 2001 -2009 (6 possible injury. and 9 property damage). One accident (rear end) was caused by a vehicle making a right turn off of Metro Boulevard. The police report indicated that the contributing factors were: Following too closely and illegal or unsafe speed on the part of the striking vehicle. State statutes clearly state that any vehicle attempting aright turn on a red at a. traffic. light must come to a complete stop and-. yield to any cross traffic before attempting the turn. Staff feels that the existing state statute, if followed; will-:allow any driver to make a safe right turn on a, red light. Staff. recommends the denial of the reauest .for a "No Rieht` Streef beeause the current state statute regarding right turns at traffic SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others. 1. Request for a pedestrian crosswalk crossing Xerxes Avenue at W. 56`, Street. Hennepin County and the City of Minneapolis must be consulted. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 4 of 4 December 1, 2010 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.N. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE City Engineer ® Action Discussion Information Date: December 21, 2010 Subject: Resolution No. 2010 -128 correcting Street Bikeway Resolution 2010 -95 for West 58th ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2010 -128 correcting Resolution No. 2010 -95 to designate West 58th Street from France Avenue to Xerxes Avenue a bicycle route and reducing the speed limit to 25 mph. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The City Council adopted the attached resolution 2010 -95 at the October 5, 2010, City Council Meeting. Staff and our City Attorney have since learned that the resolution lacked language to officially lower the speed limit to 25 mph. The roadway is currently signed for 25 mph. This resolution will enable our public safety staff to enforce the 25 mph speed limit. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 2010 -128 Resolution No. 2010 -95 g:\ engineering\ infrastructure \streets\traffic\studies \traffic studies \58th_chowen\item iv n resolution no. 2010 -128 correcting resolution no. 2010 -96 for west 58th street bikeway.docx RESOLUTION NO. 2010 -128 w9SN�1r�, DESIGNATING WEST 58TH STREET o BETWEEN FRANCE AVENUE AND XERXES AVENUE J ay A BICYCLE ROUTE AND JN�Re � DESIGNATES A 25 mph SPEED LIMIT City of Edina WHEREAS, the City Council requested staff to review the West 58th Street corridor at the May 18, 2010 City Council meeting; and WHEREAS, the City Council .directed staff to implement bike lanes along the corridor at the September 21, 2010 City Council meeting; and WHEREAS, State Statute 160.263 Subd. 4 provides that the City Council may designate a safe speed for any street or highway under its authority upon which is has established a bicycle lane provided that such safe speed shall not be lower than 25 miles per hour; and WHEREAS, on October 5, 2010, the City Council approved Resolution 2010 -95 reducing the speed limit to 25 mph and said resolution is rescinded; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the .City Council of the City of Edina, designates West 58th Street between France Avenue (County Road 17) and Xerxes Avenue (County Road 31) a bicycle route and designates the speed limit on the bicycle route as 25 miles per hour and authorizes the resigning of the speed limit signs on said street from 30 mph to 25 mph. Dated: December 21, 2010 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 21, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 City Clerk City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 -826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO.,,20:10 -95 REDUCING THE SPEEDUMIT ON T 58TH STREET BETWEEN FRANCE AVENUE AND XERXES AVENUE City of Edina WHEREAS, the City.Council requested Staff to review the West 58th Street corridor at the May 18, 2010 City Council meeting; and WHEREAS, the City Council directed Staff to implement bike lanes along the corridor at the September 21,:2010 City.Council meeting; and WHEREAS, State Statute 160.263 subd. 4 establishes a speed limit of 25 mph for streets with established bike, lanes; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Edina, authorizes the resigning of -Jhe speed limit signs on West 58t\Street between France Avenue (County Road 17) and Xerxes Avenue (County Road 31 frdV 30 mph to 25 mph. 1 Dated: October 5, 2010 Attest: L, I I A 0 /000". dj?y V Debra A. Mangers, .City lerk James B. STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK nd, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and. foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of October 5, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of c 20 /U City Clerk City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952- 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 111� ow e U) \ roJ 8S / REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.O. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk ® Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: December 21, 2010 Subject: Resolution No. 2010 -126 Accepting Various Donations ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2010 -126 RESOLUTION NO. 2010-126 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA City of Edina WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be.accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that'the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Communications Department: Edina Community Foundation $177.01 Edina Art,Center: Per Attached List Art Center Donations Edina Fire Department: Residential Mortgage $100.00 On behalf of Shaunnon Webster Dated: December 21, 2010 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA 1 CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 21, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _ day of City Clerk City Hall 952- 927 -8861 -4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityof6dina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 EDINA ART CENTER DONATIONS DECEMBER 21, 2010 John Keprios $28.00 Arthur Murray Dance Studio $258.00 Ron and Betty Hemsted $56.00 Aura Salon $90.00 Beth Andrews $28.00 Bacchus, The MN Wine Soc. $60.00 Milton and Jean Adams $96.00 Bakers Square $84.00 Keith and Linda Friede " $20.00 Bakken Museum $65.00 Joe Fleury $48.00 Barb Lippert $150.00 Tom Shirley $28.00 Barbi Lee Dance $80.00 Patricia Hunter $28.00 Beaujo's Wine Bar $20.00 James and Larae Hovland $56.00 Beth Lauber Silpada Designs $38.00 Patrick and Joni Marie Bennett $56.00 Blue Peg Men's $50.00 Jodi and Jeffrey Upin $28.00 Breadsmith $81.00 Ann Swenson $48.00 Bumbershute $55.00 Barbara Fischer $28.00 Cabot Creamery $75.00 Lindsay Rogers $28.00 Calhoun Beach Framing $100.00 James and Nancy Proman $28.00 Call That Girl $75.00 Bonnie Padilla $28.00 Ciao Bella $75.00 Bernice Amacher $28.00 Chuck and Don's Pet Food $50.00 Elizabeth Franklin $28.00 Core Power Yoga $149.00 Norman and Helen Groth $56.00 Crate and Barrel $50.00 Linda Mona $50.00 Dale Studios $200.00 Heather King $100.00 Danielle Kieffer $200.00 Kathy Letourneau $48.00 Davanni's $52.00 Nancy Higgins Oil Paints Fixative 25 Pounds Clay Day Spa $100.00 Micheal and Suzette Whitt $25.00 Dean Koutsky's Friday Painting Class $75.00 Donna Jorgensen $50.00 Bill Dietrichson $800.00 Jonathan - Nokomis Chiropractic, P.A. Olson $28.00 Eden Ave. Bar and Grill $25.00 Carol Clay $28.00 Rebecca Harkman Edible Arrangements $55.00 Cliff Parnell Large roll of paper, Photography books Edina Country Club $100.00 Elizabeth Genovese $28.00 Edina Hardware $2599 Deanna Carlson $28.00 Fairview Auxiliary $141.00 Gary Carter $28.00 Fairview Southdale $200.00 Marshall Carlson $28.00 Fantastic Sams $75.00 Lenore Jonas Felted Tote Bag Fast Frame $75.00 Dianne Meixner $75.00 Rick and Eddi Fesler $2000.00 Joan and Allen Housh $56.00 Five Guys $20.00 Ken and Gene Anderson $56.00 Galleria $100.00 Dyan Westman $28.00 Great Clips $31.50 Rebecca Markman $63.00 Mike Herstine $75.00 Lorraine Neuger $126.00 Great Clips IMAX Theatre $19.00 Jacci and Dennis Shumaker $56.00 Paula and Bob Horter $288.00 Renee Usem $28.00 Hotel Sofitel $200.00 Linda Jacobs $28.00 it Vostro Boutique $25.00 Ryan Geoghagan $28.00 Phil and Naomi Johnson $51.00 Perci Chester $28.00 Karen Knutson $285.00 Kathleen Iverson $28.00 Kay Gritton $52.00 Kari Dahlquist $28.00 Key Cadillac $300.00 Amy Plymat $47.00 Landmark Theaters $36.00 Learning RX $199.00 Sharon Wagner $120.00 Let's Dish $50.00 Saundra's Pottery Class Shaughnessy $75.00 Lili -A Williams & Friends Salon $95.00 Adama Sow $150.00 Lois Ring and Diane Kulbeck $100.00 St. Paul Chamber Orchestra $80.00 Marcia McEachron $105.00 St. Paul Saints $20.00 Mary Nevers $100.00 The Container Store $25.00 Minnesota Sno Flakes $64.00 The Great Frame Up $50.00 Minnestolgia Winery and Food $55.00 The House of Amor and Fede $35.00 Noodles and Co. $42.00 Paul Thompson $95.00 Old Log Theater $58.00 Westin $200.00 $58.00 Parma 8200 $50.00 Three Rivers Park District Patricks Bakery $25.00 YMCA $200.00 $48.00 Pin Stripes $250.00 Youth Performance Company Plymouth Playhouse $50.00 Twin Cities Orthopedics, P.A. $300.00 $105.00 Mary Mackennen Olympic Wall Electric Kiln Model 2725 Q. Cumbers Queen of Cakes $36.00 Purple Door Potters Sholarship -Adult Pottery Class Rice Paper Restaurant $35.00 R. Patricia Sullivan $400.00 Sammy's Subs $20.00 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # IV. P. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE — City Engineer ® Action F-1 Discussion ❑ Information Date: December 21, 2010 Subject: Engineering Proposal For West 56th Street Bridge Recommendation: Authorize City Manager to approve attached proposal for the preparation of Bidding Documents and Bidding for West 56th Street Bridge over Minnehaha Creek. Info /Background: This proposal is for the preparation of Bidding Documents and Bidding for West 56th Street Bridge over Minnehaha Creek. This project was in the 2010 -2014 Capital Improvement Plan and is funded through the storm water utility fund. The existing bridge was constructed in 1954. Due to the existing lack of right -of -way, the proposed bridge will possibly be a box culvert or just a replacement of the beams and decking. If the City Council authorizes the Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvement Project the proposed bridge will be bid with that project; the bridge project can also be bid as a standalone project. The estimated fee for this project is $23,697.75. The CIP has budgeted $450,000 for this project. ATTACHMENTS: Engineering Proposal Preparation of Documents and Bidding Assistance for Bridge No. 92093 gAengineering \improvements\br7 w. 56th st over m'haha creeMadmin\misc \item iv.p. engineering proposal for west 56th street bridge.docx 0 SUPPLEMENTAL LETTER AGREEMENT December 10, 2010 Wayne Houle, PE Director of Public Works and City Engineer City of Edina 7450 Metro Boulevard Edina MN 55439 -3037 Dear Wayne: e. JJ� N q v� - SN0 gkN iVOW RE: Edina, Minnesota Preparation of Bidding Documents and Bidding Assistance Services for Bridge No. 92093 SEH No. EDINA113734 10.00 Thank you for asking Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. ® (SEH) to propose on the subject project. We can assist the City's effective and efficient repair of Bridge No. 92093 carrying 56th Street over Minnehaha Creek (bridge). Enclosed with this Supplemental Letter Agreement is a location map labeled Exhibit A. Exhibit A shows the location of the bridge. Please notice that the bridge is located along the east border of the City's proposed Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Street and Utility Improvements (Street Project). If on January 18 the Council accepts the Street Project's Feasibility Study, and orders the preparation of its bidding documents, the City can potentially let this separate bridge reconstruction project at the same time as the Street Project. Bids for the separate bridge project might be lower due to the influence of the adjacent larger Street Project. At a Street Project status meeting held on October 27, the City asked SEH to prepare this proposal. for bid document production and bidding assistance services for the bridge. Since that status meeting, we have discovered the following facts regarding the bridge Project. • Based on very preliminary design work, the City developed a repair idea that would remove the existing bridge deck and beams, salvage the existing bridge abutments, and install a precast concrete box culvert to replace the bridge.. While this solution is feasible, two (2) box culverts are needed to match the existing _bridge's length and width. • Installing 2 box culverts decreases the width of Minnehaha Creek's channel (channel). • In accordance, with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) rules and regulations, a decrease in channel width would require widening in other locations to maintain the channel's effective capacity. • Significant grading of the channel would be required both upstream and downstream of the bridge to maintain the channel's effective capacity. The regrading will. impact existing rock/mortar channel sides and private landscaping features. • We believe the City's idea will require significant effort to coordinate with the MCWD since it would trigger extensive permitting submittals and review by the MCWD. For the following reasons, we believe a cast in place reinforced concrete slab span structure (concrete slab) is .a better option to repair the bridge. • Introducing a concrete slab that reuses the existing bridge abutments and matches the existing bridge's length and width. Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343 -9302 SEH is an equal opportunity employer I www.sehinc.com 1 952.912.2600 1 800.734.6757 1 952.912.2601 fax Wayne Houle December 10, 2010 Page 2 • A concrete slab would maintain the existing width of the channel and introduce additional headroom between the structure and Minnehaha Creek's surface. • The construction costs-to .repair the bridge will likely be less since significant grading of the channel will not•be required. The existing rock/mortar channel sides and private landscaping features will not be impacted by the bridge repair. • MCWD permitting review is anticipated to be much less extensive with this option. • Engineering costs will, be less since coordination with the MCWD will be minimal. Our enclosed Task Hour Budget (THB) outlines a work plan that prices these services at $23,697.75. We respectfully request-that the City consider the potential savings gained in the cost of both professional services and construction repairing the bridge using the concrete slab option. Our not -to- exceed fee includes reimbursable expenses. We will bill the City monthly on an hourly basis for services,. expenses, and equipment to complete our work. We will provide our services in accordance with our Agreement for Professional Engineering Services dated July 25, 1988. Thanks again for considering using SEH for this project. We appreciate our continuing relationship with the City. As always, please contact me with questions or comments at 952.912.2611 or ppasko @sehina.com. Sincerely, SHORT ELLIHENDRICKSON INC. Paul J. Vasko III, PE/Principal Project Manager Enclosures Accepted on this day of 92010 City of Edina, Minnesota Sy: Name Title: c: Toby Muse, SEH (without Enclosures) Jeff Johnson, SEH (with Enclosures) Jeremy Walgrave, SEH (with Enclosures) p:\ae \e \edina \113734 \lgenl \10- conh=t\56th st bridge \prop letter 56th bridge.docx F. S EH Task Hour Budget City of Edina 56th Street Bridge Repair (1) December 10, 2010 Page 1 of 3 ESTIMATED COST PROJECT TASKS FEASIBILITY STUDY PHASE 1.0 Data Collection 1.3 Supplemental Topographic Survey 2 Subtotal Hours Subtotal Labor Cost 4.0 Field Inspection 4.6 Site visit for measurements, photos and inspection of existing bridge. (10) Subtotal Hours Subtotal Labor Cost $852 6.0 Drainage / Storm Sewer Design 6.1 Prepare layout of proposed storm sewer extensions east of bridge (4) Subtotal Hours Subtotal Labor Cost $1,218 11.0 Prepare Enginee'r's Opinion of Probable Cost 11.1 Prepare Engineer's Opinion of Probable Cost (5) Subtotal Hours Subtotal Labor Cost $1,219.. 15.0 Bridge Options, 15.1 Railing Options to City Staff (7) Subtotal Hours Subtotal Labor Cost $1,369 BID DOCUMENTS PHASE 19.0 Bid Document Preparation 8 19.1.12 Preliminary Bridge Plans 3 19.1.13 Final Bridge Plans 3 19.1.14 Traffic Control Plan (12) 19.2.5 Special Provisions 6 Subtotal hours Subtotal Labor Cost $17,503 Page 1 of 3 P:\HE\E\Edina \113734 \1Genl \10- Contract\56th St Bridge\[THB Bridge Council.xlsx]Hours-Costs NOTES (1) This THB includes services to repair existing bridge No. 92093 over Minnehaha Creek along 56th St. We assume services included in this THB will be included with the Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway hmprovements project and construction of both projects would be completed concurrently. (2) Following review of City supplied survey in the area of the 56th Street Bridge, additional topographic survey is needed to supplement the City supplied survey. Based on discussions with City staff, we understand the City will conduct this supplemental survey. Assuming the City cannot do this supplemental surveying itself, actual hours based on the scope of this supplemental survey will be negotiated between the City and SEH and added as a Supplemental Agreement. (3) Based on the conditions of the existing bridge abutments, the repair plans for the bridge will include removal of the existing superstructure and construction of a cast in place reinforced concrete slab span utilizing the existing abutments. The length and width of the bridge will remain the same and the height from the water to the lowest member will likely increase with the slab span vs. the existing beams. (4) Task includes designing improvements to existing storm sewer catch basins to facilitate bridge repair work. (5) Costs will be computed in 2011 dollars Page 2 of 3 ESTIMATED COST PROJECT COST SUMMARY PROJECT TASKS 21.0 PHASE Age e Review / Submittals Subtotal Hours 33 21.5.1 NPDES Permit /SWPPP Subtotal Expenses 21.6 Public Waters Work Permit 9 $4,706.80 BID DOCUMENTS PHASE Subtotal Hours 138 Subtotal Labor Cost $18,730.95 Subtotal Labor Cost $851 23.0 Subtotal Bidding .Assistance TOTAL COST ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROPOSAL: $23,697.75 23.3 Respond to Bid In uires Subtotal Hours Subtotal Labor Cost $377 Subtotal Summary . Subtotal Summary $18,354 P:\HE\E\Edina \113734 \1Genl \10- Contract\56th St Bridge\[THB Bridge Council.xlsx]Hours-Costs NOTES (1) This THB includes services to repair existing bridge No. 92093 over Minnehaha Creek along 56th St. We assume services included in this THB will be included with the Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway hmprovements project and construction of both projects would be completed concurrently. (2) Following review of City supplied survey in the area of the 56th Street Bridge, additional topographic survey is needed to supplement the City supplied survey. Based on discussions with City staff, we understand the City will conduct this supplemental survey. Assuming the City cannot do this supplemental surveying itself, actual hours based on the scope of this supplemental survey will be negotiated between the City and SEH and added as a Supplemental Agreement. (3) Based on the conditions of the existing bridge abutments, the repair plans for the bridge will include removal of the existing superstructure and construction of a cast in place reinforced concrete slab span utilizing the existing abutments. The length and width of the bridge will remain the same and the height from the water to the lowest member will likely increase with the slab span vs. the existing beams. (4) Task includes designing improvements to existing storm sewer catch basins to facilitate bridge repair work. (5) Costs will be computed in 2011 dollars Page 2 of 3 ESTIMATED COST PROJECT COST SUMMARY FEASIBILITY STUDY PHASE Subtotal Hours 33 Subtotal Labor Cost $4,656.80 Subtotal Expenses $50.00 Subtotal $4,706.80 BID DOCUMENTS PHASE Subtotal Hours 138 Subtotal Labor Cost $18,730.95 Subtotal SEH Expenses 11 $260.00 Subtotal $18,990.95 TOTAL COST ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROPOSAL: $23,697.75 P:\HE\E\Edina \113734 \1Genl \10- Contract\56th St Bridge\[THB Bridge Council.xlsx]Hours-Costs NOTES (1) This THB includes services to repair existing bridge No. 92093 over Minnehaha Creek along 56th St. We assume services included in this THB will be included with the Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway hmprovements project and construction of both projects would be completed concurrently. (2) Following review of City supplied survey in the area of the 56th Street Bridge, additional topographic survey is needed to supplement the City supplied survey. Based on discussions with City staff, we understand the City will conduct this supplemental survey. Assuming the City cannot do this supplemental surveying itself, actual hours based on the scope of this supplemental survey will be negotiated between the City and SEH and added as a Supplemental Agreement. (3) Based on the conditions of the existing bridge abutments, the repair plans for the bridge will include removal of the existing superstructure and construction of a cast in place reinforced concrete slab span utilizing the existing abutments. The length and width of the bridge will remain the same and the height from the water to the lowest member will likely increase with the slab span vs. the existing beams. (4) Task includes designing improvements to existing storm sewer catch basins to facilitate bridge repair work. (5) Costs will be computed in 2011 dollars Page 2 of 3 (6) Task includes time to incorporate bridge special provisions into the Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements project bidding documents. (7) This task includes time to provide the City with alternative bridge railing options including pictures and cost estimates. (8) Incorporation of bridge plans into the Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements project planset. (9) DNR Permit requires a 60 day review period, therefore the application wUbe submitted by 12/17/10. Does not include permit application fee. 00) This field inspection was already completed on November 15, 2010. 01) Includes $150 DNR permit application fee. (12) Task includes design of traffic control while bridge is out of service being repaired and incorporation into the plans: Page 3 of 3 O �\ �4 (J) H�v qg �y 1888 1888 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.Q. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer ® Action Discussion 0 Information Date: December 21, 2010 Subject: Revised Special Assessment Policy for Municipal State Aid Roadways ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Municipal State Aid Designated Roadways Special Assessment Policy INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached is a revised and reformatted Special Assessment Policy for designated Municipal State Aid Roadways. Staff is requesting that this be formatted and revised to match the existing Special Assessment Policy that was adopted by City Council on September 7 th ATTACHMENT: Proposed Municipal State Aid Designated Roadways Special Assessment Policy Includes: Municipal State Aid Special Assessment Policy dated December 5, 2006 Special Assessment Policy dated September 7, 2010 I:\Admin \Council Packets 2010\2010 -09 -07 \Item IV. C. Revision to Special Assessment Policy for Local Roadways.doc EDINA CITY COUNCIL POLICY POLICY: Municipal State Aid Designated Roadways, Special Assessment Policy DATE APPROVED BY COUNCIL: POLICY PURPOSE: Establish an assessment policy for Municipal State Aid designated roadways. POLICY: °1. Cost of Municipal State Aid (MSA) Street Curb and Gutter will be financed by either MSA funds or by the Storm Water Utility Fund. 2. Street Reconstruction Costs (excluding curb and gutter) on MSA streets should be assessed at 20 percent of the cost. 3. The assessable unit for Municipal State Aid street projects shall be based on the residential equivalent unit (REU) per Lot rather than the front footage of the lot. REUs will be prorated to parcels based on trip generation for the land uses relative to the typical single - family residential land use. Non- single family or other mixed -use developments should be evaluated for each project -based on the following factors - trip generation -of. the site, access to the site, unique trip :generation or other special circumstances. 4. If a corner lot is subject to multiple street reconstruction assessments, the total assessable cost should be the equivalent to 1 residential equivalent unit. The address of the lot shall determine if the corner lot is assessed at 1, 1/3, 2/3, or 0 REU's for that project: • If the address of the lot is on the roadway being reconstructed and no previous roadway, assessments. have been levied forthat lot, the :REU shall be 1 REU. • If the address of. the lot is on the roadway being constructed and a roadway assessment has been levied previously for that lot, the REU shall be 2/3- REU. • If the address of the lot is not on the- roadway being constructed, but the side or rear yard is and no previous roadway assessment has been -levied for that lot, the REU shall be 1/3 REU. • If the address of the lot is not on the roadway being -constructed, but the side or rear yard is and a roadway assessment.has previously been levied for that lot of 1 REU, the REU shall be 0 REU. 5. Lots subject to multiple assessments cannot be treated differently than lots subject to a single assessment. 6. Capitalized interest, engineering costs, and other project related costs shall reflect the costs that have been incurred for that particular Improvement ,project. All engineering costs and other project related costs shall 'be directly related to that particular improvement project. Capitalized interest is the cost of funds used to finance the project construction until the adoption of the resolution: imposing -the special assessment. 7. Payback.of special assessments: a. The term of special assessment shall be 10 years. b. Assessment Interest Rate - The interest rate for a special assessment shall be 2% higher than the true interest "net interest" rate of the bonds that have been issued for the project. If a bond is not issued for a project then the interest rate shall be;2% higher than the true interest rate of the most recent bonds sold by the City prior to ordering the public improvement. c. The City will accept both partial pre- payments and full pre - payments on assessments before certifying the assessment to the County. For ease of administration, a minimum of 25% of the assessable cost must be applied for a partial payment. d. Hardship deferral for seniors, disabled or military persons will be accepted as a repayment. e. Payments shall be amortized using a level principal declining total payment schedule. 8. The new policy will not be retroactive to projects that have already been assessed. Background: A. Municipal State Aid Special Assessment Policy dated December 5, 2006 B. Special Assessment Policy dated September 7, 2010 g:\ engineering \assessments \policy \2010 assessment pollcy \final policy n background\20100907 special assessment pollcy.docx O B � ly MUNICIPAL STATE AID SPECIAL ASSESSMENT � POLICY CITY OF EDINA Municipal State Aid Special Assessment Policy December 5, 2006 (Adopted by City Council) PURPOSE: The City Council adopted a local roadway assessment policy in 2005. At that time the City Council requested that staff analyze our current practice of special assessments on Municipal State Aid Roadways. This report analyzes the existing practice of how the City applies special assessments for Municipal State Aid Roadway Reconstruction Projects and if this practice should be revised. HISTORY: The City of Edina currently has over 200 miles of roadways within our boundaries. 40 miles of these roadways are designated as Municipal State Aid (MSA) roadways. A MSA roadway is designated through the State of Minnesota under State Statute Chapter 162. Funds for the MSA system are appropriated from the Municipal State Aid Special Assessment Policy December 5, 2006 Page 2 .Transportation allocates funds and - administers their requirements for the reconstruction of these designated roadways. The City of Edina is. appropriated approximately 1.2 Million dollars per year to be used for reconstruction .of ,MSA roadways. MSA roadways are typically functionally classified as.collectors or above; meaning that these roadways carry more :traffic than a local roadway would .carry, see, attached Existing Traffic Volumes. Atypical residential local roadway carries around 1,000 vehicles per day or less. The City's designated MSA roadways are shown in the figure above. In 2005 the. City Council adopted a local roadway assessment policy to cover -the ,non -MSA roadways, see attached policy. This policy includes;the following synopsis: 1. Curb" and gutter costs to be funded' through the Stormwater Utility. Fund. 2. Street reconstruction cost to be assessed at 100% of the cost. 3. Assessable unit ,shall be residential equivalent unit (REU) rather than front footage of lot. 4. Multiple assessments should never be more than 1 REU per lot. 5. Multiple assessments cannot be treated differently. 6. The term of the assessment should stay at 10 years. 7. Assessment interest rate should_ be 2% over a Aaa Bond rate. 8. Pre and partial payments shall be accepted on projects. 9: Payment schedule should remain at a level principal payment schedule. 10. The new policy shall not be retroactive. Reconstruction of MSA roadways. have been special assessed in the past. and have been assessed based on assessable front footage. Prior to 2004 the MSA special assessments were assessed at a set front footage rate of $20 per front foot for residential properties and $45 per front foot for commercial properties. The special assessment percentage of construction cost for these projects ranged from 21 to 24 %, see chart below. Project From To % of MSA Cost Cost per assessable lineal foot Maloney Avenue Washington Avenue Blake Road 22% $ 20.00 West 66th Street TH100 Valley View Road 21% $ 20.00 West 77th Street Pentagon Park Parklawn Avenue 24% $ 45.00 Valley View Road West 65th Street Wooddale Avenue 20% $ 49.12 Wooddale Avenue valley View Road West 56th Street 1 20% $ 32.90 West 58th Street Concord Avenue Wooddale Avenue 1 20% $ 67.91 Municipal State Aid Special Assessment Policy December 5, 2006 Page 3 POLICY BACKGROUND: The assessments shown above indicate that approximately 20% of the MSA construction cost has been specially assessed back to the adjoining property. If this amount is increased, the additional monies can be utilized for additional MSA roadway.projects. The table below shows the increase in monies available over a five - year period (our. typical length of the Capital Improvement Program): Year Allocated Amount Additional Funds Generated per Assessed Amount 25% 30% 35% 40% 2007 $ 1,200,000 $ _ 60,000 $ 120,000 $ 180,000 $ 240,000 2008 $ 1,200,000 $ 60;000 $ 120;000 $ 180,000 $ 240,000 2009 $ 1,20b,000 $ 60,000 $ 120,000 $ 180,000 $ 240,000 2010 $ 1,200;000 $ . 60,000 $ 120,000 $180,000 $ 240,000 2011 $ 1,200,000 $ 60,000 $ 120,000 $ 180,000 $ 240,000 Total 5 -Year Extra Amount: $ 300,000 $ 600,000 $ 900,000 $ 1,200,000 Special assessments for MSA projects have been typically based on assessable front footage. Staff has analyzed using the REU methodology for assessing. MSA projects. Example 1 includes a typical two -lane roadway that includes a small City Park. The City Park was analyzed for equivalent build -able lots versus activities of the park (the greater REU was assigned). Example 2 includes a typical two -lane roadway with. a school campus along one side of the roadway. The school campus assessments were analyzed based on trips per day from the campus versus equivalent build- able lots. Example 3 includes both residential and a small segment of commercial. A typical 60 -foot residential property is summarized below for both the existing practice of Assessable Front Footage analysis and proposed REU analysis: .EXAMPLE COST PER % COST PER % OF MSA COST Based on LN on REU 20% Y &o 30 %* o 25 /o . 40% 0 30�% : $ 2,169.70 0. 35 /0 $ 3,254.55 o 40 /o $ 4,339.39 2 $ 2,020.62 $. 2,054.40. $ 2,464.80 $ 2,875.80 $ 3,286:80 2 $ 4,041.82 $ 2,431.80 $ 2,918.40 $ 3,405.00 $ 3,891.60 3 $1;9 „74OOn $ 2,467.20 $ 2,961.00 $ 3,454.20 $ 3,948.00 "Note; Existing percentage. EXAMPLE COST PER % OF MSA COST Based on REU 20% 25% 30 %* 35% 40% 1 $ 2,169.70 $ 2,712.12 $ 3,254.55 $ 3,796.97 $ 4,339.39 2 $ 2,020.62 $ 2,525.77 $ 3,030.92 $ 3,536.08 $ 4,041.23 3 $ 2,020.91 $ 2,562.14 $ 3,031.36 $ 3,536.59 $ 4,041.82 *Note: Proposed Percentage. Municipal State Aid Special Assessment Policy December 5, 2006 Page 4 Example 4 includes only commercial, see attached preliminary assessment role. In Example 4 staff applied the Residential Equivalent Unit Summary for the different types of .land uses,.,see below. Access to the site was also considered in applying REU's. Staff recommends that this methodoloay be evaluated for each individual ..project where commercial or other mixed -use developments exist. Current Land Use Class REU Notes Residential -.Single Family Dwellin 1.0 1 Residential - Two Family, Du lezes, Quads 0.8 1 i Residential - Apartments, . Condominiums, Cooperatives, Nurseries, Convalescent Homes 0.5 1 Industrial 0.5 2,3 Office /Retail /Financial Institutions 1.5 2 Public Buildings - City 09 2 Public Buildin s - Schools 0.2 2 Churches 0.8 2 Notes: 1. Per Unit 2. Per Gross Floor Area 1000 SF 3. All uses allowed in Planned Industrial Development (PID) except offices and retail. Type of Property COST PER % OF MSA COST USING LF & REU ANALYSIS 20% 25% 30 % 35% 40% LF REU LF REU LF REU LF REU LF REU Commercial - -50,000 SF Bldg 14,050 39,070, 17,560 48,840 21,080 58,610 24,600 68,370 28,110 78,140 Commercial - 170,000 SF Bldg 40,710 144,270 1 50,890 1 55,340 61,070 66,405 1 71,250 77,480 81,430 88,540 PROPOSED POLICY: In accordance with State Statute 429, the amount of an assessment levied on a property may not exceed the benefits received. A cost benefit- analysis would show that a certain benefit is realized by properties adjacent to MSA roadways. However, it is understood that due .to the: character of MSA roadways, adjacent properties should not fund 1,00 percent of these improvements. Traffic on MSA roadways, where single family residential properties exist, typically have on an average of over three times the amount Average Daily Trips (ADT) than on a local roadway. The following is recommended to be included with this policy: 1. Cost of Municipal State Aid (MSA) Street Curb and Gutter will be financed by either MSA funds or by the Storm Water Utility.Fund.- Municipal State Aid Special Assessment Policy December 5, 2006 Page 5 2. Street Reconstruction Costs (excluding curb and gutter) on MSA= streets should be assessed at 20 percent of the cost. ATTACHMENTS: 3: The assessable unit for Municipal State Aid. street projects shall be based on the residential equivalent unit (REU) per Lot rather than the front footage of the lot. REUs Will be prorated to parcels based on trip generation for the land uses relative.to the typical. single- family residential: land use. Non- single family 'or, ,other mixed -use developments should -be evaluated for each, =project based-on the following factors - trip generation of the.site, access to the site, unique trip generation or other special circumstances. 4.... If a corner lot is subject to multiple.street reconstruction assessments over a period .of years, the total assessable cost 'should bethe equivalent to 1 residential equivalent unit. 5. Multiple Assessments cannot be treated differently than areas with one assessment being incurred. 6. The term of MSA roadway reconstruction assessments will be 10 years. 7. Assessment Interest Rate — The interest rate of the assessment should be. pegged to the assessment bonds that have been issued in the past 12 months or the 10 -year Aaa bond rate plus 2 %. 8. The City will accept both partial pre- payments and full pre- payments on assessments before going to the County for tax rolls. For ease of administration, a minimum-of 25% of the assessable cost must be applied for a partial payment. 9. Payment Schedule — Currently, assessments are calculated on .a level principal payment schedule. This results in a declining payment schedule, ,which is cheaper than a traditional amortized schedule, which would have equal payments over the life of.the assessment. Staff recommends that the declining balance schedule continue to be used because of the lower total cost. 10. The new policy will not be retroactive to projects that have already been assessed and /or where project assessments are pending. 1. Existing (1997) traffic volumes for Municipal State Aid Roadways. 2. Examples 1 -4 of the preliminary assessment roles, which include the 20 %, 25 %, 30 %, 35 %, and 40oa comparisons. 3. Current approved Local Special Assessment Policy 4. Current final assessment roles for local roadway projects.. EDINA CITY COUNCIL POLICY POLICY: Special Assessment Policy DATE APPROVED 'BY COUNCIL: September 7,'20.10 POLICY PURPOSE: Establish an assessment policy for typical assessments that include local roadways, sidewalks, decorative street lighting; sound walls, garbage and debris removal,,_aquatic weeds, weed mowing, tree removals, and maintenance districts. POLICY: 1. Cost of Non -State Aid Residential Street Curb and Gutter will be financed by the Storm Water Utility Fund. 2. Street Reconstruction Cost (excluding curb and gutter) should be assessed at 100% of the cost. 3. The assessable unit for non -state aid residential street projects should be the residential equivalent unit (REU) rather than the front footage of the lot. 4. If a' corner lot is subject to' multiple street reconstruction assessments, the total assessable cost should be the equivalent to 1 residential equivalent unit. The address of the lot. shall determine if the corner lot is assessed at 1, 1/3, 2/3, or 0 REU's for that project: • If the address of the lot is on the roadway being reconstructed and no previous roadway assessments have been levied for that lot, the REU shall be 1 REU. • If the address. of the lot is on the roadway being constructed and a roadway assessment has been levied previously for that lot, the REU shall be 2/3 REU. • If the address of the lot is: not on the roadway being constructed, but the side or rear yard is-and no previous roadway assessment has been levied for that lot, the REU shall be 1/3 REU. • If the address of the lot. <is not on the roadway being constructed, but the side or rear yard its and a roadway assessment has previously been levied for that lot of 1 REU, the REU`shall be 0 REU. 5: Lots. subject to multiple assessments cannot be treated differently than lots subject to a single assessment., 6. Capitalized interest, engineering costs, and other project related costs shall reflect the costs that have been incurred . for that particular. special assessment. All engineering costs and other project related costs shall be directly related to that particular special assessment. Capitalized interest is the cost of funds used to finance the project construction until the adoption of the resolution imposing the special assessment. 7. Payback of special assessments: a. The term of special assessments are as follows: i. Local- roadway reconstruction 10 years. ii. Sidewalks (stand alone project) - 3 years. iii. Decorative street lighting (stand alone project) - 3 years. iv. Sound walls - 15 years. v. Garbage and debris removal, aquatic weeds, weed mowing, and, and maintenance districts - 1 year. vi. Tree removals - 1 year if under $500, 2 years if $500 to $1000, and 3 years if over $1000. b. Assessment Interest Rate - The interest rate for a special assessment shall be 2% higher than the true interest "net interest" rate of the bonds that have been issued for the project. If a bond is not issued for a project then the interest rate shall be 2% higher than the true interest rate of the most recent bonds sold by the City prior to ordering the public improvement. The interest rates for 7.a.v. and 7.a.vi. above shall be 6.5 %. c. The City will accept both partial pre - payments and. full pre- payments on assessments before certifying the assessment to the County. For ease of administration, a minimum of 25% of the assessable cost must be applied for a partial payment. d. Senior Deferral Program will be accepted as a repayment. e. Payments shall be amortized using a level principal declining total payment schedule. 8. The new policy will not be retroactive to projects that have already been assessed. Background: A. Special Assessment Policy Background dated September 7, 2010 B. Special Assessment Policy Proposal dated August 16, 2005 g: \engineering \assessments \policy \2010 assessment policy \final policy n background\20100907 special assessment policy.docx R55CKREG LOG20000 251111 0724890 5842.5515 CITY OF EuNA YORK SELLING 32.60 251525 0724911 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX Council Check Register 48.00 251526 0724912 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 12/312010 - 12/9/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier /.Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No. Subledger A_ ccount Description 342017 121312010 234.11 123261 CONSTITUTION STATE SERVICES LL '251066 84467 1160.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS FINANCE 1,762.00 WORKERS COMP 2.51279 1496841 1470.6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 342023 12/9/2010 101116 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES 1,762.00 49.25 342018 12/9/2010 113010. 119677 ACCESS 60MMUNICATIONS INC. LAUNDRY 54.09 251379 113010 113.02 FIBER CONSULTING 251280 17676 46001.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 113010 5421.6201 78.02 FIBER CONSULTING 251281 17675- 46001.6710- EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 5861.6201 LAUNDRY 191.04 251379 113010 1470.6201 342019 12/9/21110 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 113010 1551.6201 LAUNDRY 12/8/2010 8:53:24 Page - 1 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIBER OPTIC CABLING FIBER OPTIC CABLING 58.40 251111 0724890 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 32.60 251525 0724911 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 48.00 251526 0724912 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 139.00 342022 12/912010 342020 1219/2010 102716 ALLEGRA EDINA 234.11 369.98 CIP PRINTING '251066 84467 1160.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS FINANCE 369.98 342021 1219/2010 120168 ALLIANCE ELECTRIC INC. 1,884.80 THEATER CURTAIN ELECTRICAL 00002214 251377 7285 5600.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 1,884.80 342022 12/912010 101606 AMERICAN HOTEL REGISTER CO. 234.11 HANGERS 251378 2151066 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 234.11 342023 12/9/2010 101116 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES 49.25 251379 113010. 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 54.09 251379 113010 5841.6201 LAUNDRY 60.28 251379 113010 5421.6201 LAUNDRY 112.36 251379 113010 5861.6201 LAUNDRY 206.74 251379 113010 1470.6201 LAUNDRY 216.12 251379 113010 1551.6201 LAUNDRY 323.48 251379 113010 1470.6201 LAUNDRY --342024 12/9/2010 127706 AMUNDSON, RACHEL 45.00 ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE DECOY 45.00 342026 1219/2010 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 251380 120210 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EB /CL BALANCE SHEET EDINBOROUGH -PARK 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY GRILL VERNON OCCUPANCY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL .FIRE DEPT. GENERAL: LIQUOR INSPECTION R55CKREG }: LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 49.22 COMPUTER PAPER 49.22 COMPUTER PAPER 98.43 COMPUTER PAPER 196.87 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT PO # Doc No 251218 251218 251218 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 12/3/2010 - 1219/2010 Inv No Account No 10265053 -00 5822.6512 10265053 -00 5862.6512 10265053 -00 5842.6512 342026 12/9/2010 SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 103870 ANDERSON, SHAWN GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 65.40 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 251282 112210 5821.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 32.70 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 251283 113010 . 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL' 98.10 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 342027 12/912010 GOLF DOME PROGRAM 111440 ANTIGUA GROUP INC., THE RUBBISH'REMOVAL MAINT.OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL. 1,459.40 MERCHANDISE 251424 3407462 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 1,459.40 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL - VERNON OCCUPANCY 342028 12/9/2010 CITY HALL GENERAL, 100634: ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. RUBBISH REMOVAL ' GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 2,042.38 WIRE PARTITION / RACK; 00001001 251284 10076157 5511.6182 RUBBISH`REMOVAL 2,042.38 5620.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH!PARK 342029 12/912010 PSTF OCCUPANCY 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 33.00 251381 120110 33.28 251381 120110 38.39 251381 120110 44.71 251381 120110 66.03 251381 120110 68.91 251381 120110 81.29 251381 120110 . 83.66 251381 120110 _ 88.77 251381 120110 99.35 251381 120110 232.79 251381 120110. 298.39 251381 120110 298.40 251381 120110 309.03 251381 120110 326.58 251381 120110 601.24 251381 120110 192.93 251382 DEC6110 2,896.75 342030 1219/2010 104069 B.B. WATSON GRAPHIC DESIGN 336.96 BUSINESS CARDS 251154 475 336.96 Subledger Account Description PAPER SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES 1218/2010 - 8:53:24 Page- 2 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL .1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 421260.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT 5821.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL' CLUB HOUSE 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 5210.6182 RUBBISH`REMOVAL GOLF DOME PROGRAM 5422.6182 RUBBISH'REMOVAL MAINT.OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL. FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL - VERNON OCCUPANCY 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL, 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ' GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING' 1645.6182 RUBBISH'REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 1`- 5511.6182 RUBBISH`REMOVAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS] 5620.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH!PARK 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/8/2010 8:53:24 Council Check Register Page - 3 12/3/2010 — 12/912010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 342031 1219/2010 100638 BACHMAN'S 92.25 FLOWERS 251425 104642158 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 92.25 342032 1219/2010 118883 BAN -KOE SYSTEMS INC. 606.11 ALARM REPAIR 00008076 251469 58177 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 606.11 342033 12/9/2010 104346 BARCLAY AUDIO 1,681.12 SOUND SYSTEM REPAIR 00002029 251219 112210 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,681.12 342034 12/912010 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 67.20 BATTERY 00005423 251220 5890 - 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 67.20 342035 1219/2010 125300 BAUMAN, DOUG 106.75 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 251221 120110 5510.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ARENA ADMINISTRATION 106.75 342036 12/912010 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS 617.20 HOCKEY GOAL REPAIR PARTS 00001891 251155 00081646 1648.6530 REPAIR PARTS SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 4,352.37 REPLACEMENT MATTING 00002025 251426 00081986 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES 4,969.57 342037 12/9/2010 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 2,266.05 251112 55932500 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 77.42 251113 84509300 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5.76 251114 84504500 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 396.35 251324 55932600 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,994.63 251527 56036200 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,740.21 342038 12/9/2010 103486 BEND IN THE RIVER BIG BAND 125.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 12/19110 251490 120510 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 125.00 342039 12/9/2010 100661 SENN, BRADLEY 64.19 ART WORK SOLD 251222 112210 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 64.19 342040 12/9/2010 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/8/2010 8:53:24 Council Check Register Page - 4 12/3/2010 - 12/9/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 21.59 STAMP PAD, INK 251223 IN -19937 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 21.59 342041 12/912010 100663 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC. 2,336.79 QPR 00001223 251224 17942 5913.6518 BLACKTOP DISTRIBUTION 2,336.79 342042 12/912010 124534 BLACKSTONE CONTRACTORS LLC 6,975.00 LANNON STONE WALL REPAIR 00001062 251067 213 1314.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET RENOVATION 6,975.00 342043 12/9/2010 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 235.38 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003854 251285 64589 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 9.18 DISINFECTING WIPES 00001437 251491 63366.1 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 58.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES 251492 64046 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 34.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 251493 64046.1 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 60.43 OFFICE SUPPLIES 251494 64347 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 15.51 INK CARTRIDGES, STAPLES 00001437 251495 64297 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 74.86 INK CARTRIDGES, STAPLES 00001437 251495 64297 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 6.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 251496 64462/4786CM 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 13.53 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 251496 64462/4786CM 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 13.53 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 251496 64462/4786CM 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 13.53 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 251496 64462/4786CM 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 13.53 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 251496 64462/4786CM 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 13.53 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 251496 64462/4786CM 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 562.60 342044 12/9/2010 100669 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 157.15 BRAKE PAD KIT, SEALS 00005372 251156 465779 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 157.15 342046 12/9/2010 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 2,530.00 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 251225 328115 01370.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -370 CARSONS HILL RECON 2,510.00 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 251226 328114 01355.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -355 GOLF TERRACE N'HOOD 2,085.00 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 251227 328116 01371.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -371 KILLARNEY SHORES 1,780.00 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 251228 328118 01373.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -373 OSCAR ROBERTS RECON 1,400.00 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION 251229 328117 01372.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -372 McCAULEY HEIGHTS 10,305.00 342046 12/912010 125155 BRAUN, MICHAEL 240.00 ABOUT TOWN PHOTOS 251286 1039 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 240.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 12/9110 251497 CITY OF EDINA 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION Council Check Register 12/3/2010 - 12/9/2010 12/912010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 342047 1219/2010 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. TISSUE, TOWELS 251383 86163 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 167.98 EDINA LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 251157 23465 5862.6575 PRINTING 86198 167.99 EDINA LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 251157 23465 5822.6575 PRINTING 1,107.68 167.99 EDINA LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 251157 23465 5842.6575 PRINTING 342050 503.96 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 342048 12/9/2010 103244 BURTIS, ROBERT 48.60 251115 12/8/2uiu 8:53:24 Page - 5 Business Unit VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 12/9110 251497 120610 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 342049 12/912010 127600 CAPITAL MAINTENANCE SERVICES L 229.10 TISSUE, TOWELS 251383 86163 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 878.58 DEC CLEANING 251384 86198 7411.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,107.68 342050 12/9/2010 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 48.60 251115 13716 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,332.25 251325 13712 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 326.55 251528 13711 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 48.60 251529 13710 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,756.00 342051 12/9/2010 100679 CARLSON TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT 3,340.91 SNOWBLOWER 00001617 251158 E02704 421650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT 3,340.91 342062 12/9/2010 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 199.00 251116 88516 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 199.00 342063 12/9/2010 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 144.54 DESK MOUNT ARM 251159 VPF0427 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 144.54 342054 12/9/2010 101616 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. 101.15 CURE & SEAL 00001006 251068 1240416 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 101.15 342065 12/9/2010 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES IN 123.28 251069 2096262 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 123.28 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/8/2010 8:53:24 Council Check Register Page - 6 12/3/2010 - 1219/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 342056 1219/2010 119661 CENTRAL ENVELOPE CORPORATION 151.26 EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER 251160 68863 2210.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 151.26 342067 12/9/2010 119726 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 289.65 251117 432702 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 289.65 342068 12/9/2010 100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 191.80 251530 0198256510 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 191.80 342069 12/912010 101119 COCKRIEL, VINCE 36.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 251427 112210 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 36.00 342060 12/912010 120433 COMCAST 74.95 8772 10 614 0165667 251287 165667 -11/10 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 88.26 8772 10 614 0177449 251428 177449 -11/10 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 163.21 342061 121912010 124910 COURSE TRENDS INC. 100.00 EMAIL MARKETING 00006170 251288 169496 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 100.00 342062 1219/2010 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 895.00 BAGS FOR RESALE 251385 986301 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 2,190.88 BIRTHDAY PARTY BAGS 251386 9863 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 3,085.88 342063 121912010 126183 CROW RIVER LIGHTING SERVICES 191.58 LIGHT BULBS 00008066 251161 493 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 191.58 342064 12/9/2010 122096 DAKOTA COUNTY LUMBER CO. 4,999.64 LUMBER FOR RINKS 00001608 251162 149456 47069.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PARK HOCKEY RINK 81.66 NAILS FOR RINKS 00001608 251163 149457 47069.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PARK HOCKEY RINK 224.71 LUMBER, NAILS 00001648 251164 149679 47069.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PARK HOCKEY RINK 4,564.95 LUMBER FOR RINKS 00001803 251165 150066 47069.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PARK HOCKEY RINK 81.66 LUMBER FOR RINKS 00001883 251166 150461 47069.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PARK HOCKEY RINK 9,952.62 CITY OF EDINA 12/8/201u 8:53:24 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 7 121312010 - 1219/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 342065 12/9/2010 104020 DALCO 24.58 CREDIT TAKEN TWICE 251230 2245800DUE 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 247.04 ROLL TOWEL 00009284 251231 2270990 5111.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 923.40 BLACK MATS (CARPETING) 00009284 251289 2267806 5111.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 719.03 SNOW PLOW COATING 00005249 251429 2272224 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 215.89 PUNCH 00005122 251498 2246833 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 56.17 GLASS CLEANER 00005239 251499 2255120 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,186.11 342066 12/9/2010 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 4,443.26 251326 579035 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 66.30 251327 579058 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,410.85 251328 579057 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 44.80 251531 579034 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,501.75 251532 579033 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 9,466.96 342067 12/9/2010 100713 DAY - TIMERS INC. 76.73 CALENDARS 251500 60268739 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 76.73 342068 12/9/2010 127701 DEBELLIS, DEBORAH 21125 FACE PAINTERS FOR NEW YEARS 251387 120310 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 211.25 342069 12/912010 118490 DEEP ROCK WATER COMPANY 68.48 622833 WATER 251388 112310 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 68.48 342070 12/9/2010 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 39.39 SENS / SEND UNIT SET 00001980 251167 535569 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 21.12 SCRIBES 00005337 251232 535335 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 41.73 PUNCH SET, WRENCH 00005371 251233 535941 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 9.45 SCREWDRIVER SET 00005338 251234 536077 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 321.66 SOCKET SETS, NEEDLE NOSE SET 00005066 251430 536637 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 15.75 SUCTION GUNS 00005378 251431 536648 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 449.10 342071 12/9/2010 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 63.51 BAKERY 251168 351512 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 63.51 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/8/2010 8:53:24 Council Check Register Page - 8 1213/2010 - 12/9/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 342072 12/9/2010 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 22.75 251235 110312148 -10/10 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 22.75 251235 110312148 -10/10 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 22.75 251235 110312148 -10/10 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 23.09 251432 110312148 -11/10 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 23.09 251432 110312148 -11/10 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 23.09 251432 110312148 -11/10 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 137.52 342073 12/9/2010 123996 DICK'S /LAKEVILLE SANITATION IN 3,439.71 REFUSE 251070 1175903 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 3,848.52 REFUSE 251071 1175904 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 7,288.23 342074 12/9/2010 122199 DOLL, MARTY 95.90 HOLIDAY CARDS 251501 120610 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 172.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 251501 120610 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 268.40 342076 12/9/2010 124603 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 461.33 FUSES, WIRE 00001069 251433 07686600 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 461.33 342076 12/9/2010 101667 EDINA HIGH SCHOOL 270.65 POLICE/PARENT FORUM 251434 111573 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 270.65 342077 12/912010 123189 EDINA LIQUOR 84.50 BEER 00006338 251290 123 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 84.50 342078 12/912010 106224 EDINA POLICE RESERVES 140.00 PUMPKIN FEST 251502 120610 1428.6010 SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES OFF DUTY EMPLOYMENT 140.00 342079 12/912010 127707 ERICKSON, GARRETT 60.00 ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE DECOY 251389 120210 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR INSPECTION 60.00 342080 12/912010 127711 ERIKSMOEN, PETTER 398.75 RECOUNT ELECTION JUDGE 251503 120610 1180.6010 SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES ELECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS " EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN Council Check Register EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 12/3/2010 - 12/9/2010 Check # Date Amount_. Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 398.75 342081 12/912010 127590 ETTERMAN ENTERPRISES 206.92 BULBS, FUSES, CONNECTORS 00005328 251169 165589 1553.6530 206.92 342082 12/9/2010 101476 EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES _ 390.00 EASEMENT ACQUISITION AGENT 251236 00 -10113 07101.1705.20 390.00 342083 121912010 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 285.18 BRAKE PADS, ROTORS 00005297 251072 69- 025414 1553.6530 352.89 PADS, ROTORS 00005297 251170 69- 025772 1553.6530 73.67 =SPARK PLUGS, FILTER 00005373 251171 69- 025687 15516530 8.59 SPARK PLUGS 00005373 251172 70- 034261 1553.6530 66.97- CREDIT 251237 1- 3508631 1553.6530 32.08 HEADLAMP BULBS - 00005420 251390 69- 026138 1553.6530 685.44 342084 12/912010 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL 10.74 MAYORS PHOTO 251391 8326063 - 296084 1120.6106 10.74 342086 1219/2010 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 25.47 BUILDING REPAIR PARTS 00001895 251173 MNTC2103899 1646.6530 20.09 TAPS . 00001065` 251174 MNTC2103527 1301.6406 45.56 342086 12/912010 102845 FCC.LCC 249.75 MIC BATTERY PACKS 251175 16723 1400.6160 249.75 342087 121912010 102101 FEDEX OFFICE 47.37 CARDS 00006169 251291 062200020459 5410.6575 47.37 342088 12/9/2010. 104270 FLARE HEATING & AIR CONDITIONI 5,790.00 CONTRACT FURNACE WORK 00001872 251435 0020173 -IN 1646.6103 " 5,790.00 342089 12/912010 101475 FOOTJOY 51.14 SHOES 251436 3470235 5440.5511 12/8/2010 8:53:24 Page- 9 Subledger Account Description Business Unit REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONSULTING DESIGN S101 FRANCE AVE 48TH- SUNNYSIDE REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS " EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION 'REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 342090 12/9/2010 342091 12/912010 342092 12/9/2010 342093 12/9/2010 342094 121912010 342096 1219/2010 342096 12/9/2010 342097 12/9/2010 Amount Supplier / Explanation CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1213/2010 - 12/9/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 51.14 106351 FOSTER, REBECCA 90.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 251238 120110 1260.6107 90.00 102466 GALLS INC. 346.91 RESERVE UNIFORMS 251437 510985032 1419.6203 346.91 106608 GEMPLER'S INC. 224.04 TOOL RACKS - 00005062 251176 1016433162 1553.6406 224.04 124641 GEYEN GROUP 363.38 CARPET CLEANING 00006168 251177 21006 5420.6511 363.38 101178 GOPHER 108.18 EQUIPMENT MATS, NETS 251392 8225746 5620.6406 108.18 102646 GRAFFITI CONTROL SERVICES 84.97 GRAFFITI REMOVAL 00001066 251073 573 1343.6103 84.97 101103 GRAINGER 96.00 SALT SPREADER 00001052 251178 9401259693 1552.6530 143.13 BATTERIES, BOXES 00001051 251179 9400513744 1322.6406 70.48 TARP STRAPS, EAR PLUGS 00005411 251180 9402784525 1553.6610 782.48 HOPPER 00005331 251181 9400513736 421553.6710 120.89 BATTERIES 00001057 251239 9402633946 1260.6406 31.86 TICKET HOLDERS, MARKERS 00005412 251240 9403421069 1553.6406 407.53 COMBO KIT DRILL 00001698 251438 9354281868 1301.6556 858.43 VACUUM, MULTIMETER 00001693 251439 9348813859 1301.6406 148.85 SWITCH, KEYS, SOCKETS 00002026 251440 9400513751 5630.6530 10.48 SCREWS 00002026 251441 9401644480 5630.6530 2,670.13 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 86.25 251329 123906 5862.5513 92.25 251533 124618 5822.5513 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 1218/2010 8:53:24 Page - 10 Business Unit ENGINEERING GENERAL RESERVE PROGRAM EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CLUB HOUSE EDINBOROUGH PARK BRIDGES GUARD RAILS CENT SVC PW BUILDING STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQ OPER CENTRAL_SERV EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/8/2010 8:53:24 Council Check Register Page - 11 12/3/2010 — 12/9/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description . Business Unit 2,105.25 251534 124605 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,283.75 342098 12/9/2010 126633 GRAPHIC SOURCE INC. 1,205.00 WEST ARENA BANNERS 00008077 251504 33015 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 1,205.00 342099 12/9/2010 101618 GRAUSAM, STEVE 197.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 251241 120110 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 18.77 251505 120310 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 30.00 CARDING INCENTIVE 251505 120310 5622.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 30.00 CARDING INCENTIVE 251505 120310 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 30.00 CARDING INCENTIVE 251505 120310 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 305.77 342100 121912010 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 58.57 LIGHTING 00002032 251442 951060930 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 58.57 342101 12/9/2010 104482 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 711.32 REINSTALL ELECTRICAL SERVICE 00001159 251242 10 -11 -13 1322.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 29,450.00 MUSCO SPORT LIGHTING SYSTEMSl0001594 251243 10 -9 -70 47069.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PAMELA PARK HOCKEY RINK 30,161.32 342102 12/9/2010 103884 HANCO CORPORATION 355.04 TRACTION CABLES 00005361 251182 548298 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 355.04 342103 1219/2010 127602 HAROLD J. PIETIG & SONS LLC 2,880.00 BRICK BUTTRESS REPAIR 251074 112310 1314.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET RENOVATION 2,880.00 342104 1219/2010 126460 HARR, RICHARD 45.00 ALCOHOL COMPLIANCE DECOY 251393 120210 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR INSPECTION 45.00 342105 1219/2010 100797 HAWKINS INC. 2,654.25 CHEMICALS 00001216 251075 3176232 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 2,654.25 342106 12/9/2010 100800 HEDGES, DIANA 227.11 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 251506 120310 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 2,475.08 CITY OF EDINA 251183 QB15733 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Council Check Register 2,475.08 12/3/2010 — 12/9/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 227.11 342107 12/912010 251507 114483 HEIMAN FIRE EQUIPMENT INC. 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 221.60 BATTERIES 00003836 251292 0777577 -IN 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 221.60 342111 12/9/2010 342108 12/912010 106436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 700.00 ACE SUBSCRIPTION 251244 20106211 -11 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 67.75 TRANSACTION PROCESSING 251293 23 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 767.75 342109 12/9/2010 106371 HENNEPIN FACULTY ASSOCIATES 12/8/2010 8:53:24 Page - 12 Business UnK FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ASSESSING ASSESSING 2,475.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 251183 QB15733 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,475.08 342110 12/9/2010 116377 HENRICKSEN PSG 72.02 ELECTRICAL IN -FEED CABLE 251507 461350 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 72.02 342111 12/9/2010 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 3,154.06 5 PCS FOR FIRE 00004390 251184 48569673 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 3,154.06 342112 1219/2010 103763 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 64.17 VACUUM PARTS 00002212 251394 7338381 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 347.46 HAND SANITIZER 00002212 251395 6539082 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 411.63 342113 12/9/2010 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,645.10 251330 542406 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,645.10 342114 12/912010 127706 HOLLAND, MARK G 20.00 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 251396 120110 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 20.00 342116 121912010 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 359.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 251443 120110 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 359.00 342116 12/9/2010 119998 HOVLAND, JAMES 2,095.00 INTERCITY LEADERSHIP 251444 REGISTRATION 1100.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CITY COUNCIL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1218/2010 8:53:24 Council Check Register Page- 13 1213/2010 - 1219/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,095.00 342117 12/9/2010 104167 INTERNATIONAL CODE.COUNCIL INC 203.96 CODE BOOKS 00003842 251294 1253993 -IN 1470.6405 BOOKS '& PAMPHLETS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 203.96 342118 12/9/2010 127708 J &.R CUSTOM CLEANING LLC 1,531.53 OCT CLEANING SERVICE 251397 480 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT- EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,531.53 NOV CLEANING 251398 490 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 3,063.06 342119 12/9/2010 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY - 346.19 WIRE 00001070 251245 4307303 -01 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 346.19 342120 12/9/2010 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 43.00 251535 1454827 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,569.95 251536 1454826 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 38.00 251537 1454824 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,717.25 251537 1454824 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 18,625.42 251538 1454832 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 26,993.62 342122 12/9/2010 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 293.58 251118 1952828 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,478.22 251119 1951608 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,611.70 251120 1951603 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,580.80 251121 1951602 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD. WINE YORK SELLING 10.40- 251122 471271 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 18.OD- 251123 478613 5822.5513 . COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 7.63- 251124 471273 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 9.00- 251125 471272 5842.5513- COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6.90- 251126 -478615 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 17.94- 251127 478616 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6.66- 251128 478614 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,381.56 251331 1956227 5862.5512 COST:OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,359.31 251,332 1956230 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,738.04 251333 1956232 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,403.15 251334 . 1956231 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,270.17 251335 1956228 5862.5513 COST -OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 736.31 251336 1956229 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,994.23 251539 1956220 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING P ' R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA i- 12/8/2010 8:53:24' e Council Check Register Page - 14 12/3/2010 - 12/9/2010 ' Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 6,085.15 251540 1956219 5842.5513 COST -OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING. 205.60 251541 1956222 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 9,134.43 251542 1956223 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,232.00 251543 1954224 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,295.22 251544 1956221. 5842.5512 COST OF.GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,859.25 251545 1956218 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,477.77 251546 1956224 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,573.59 251547 1956225 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,980.30 251548 1956226 5842.5512 COST OF. GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 979.08 251549 1956216 5822.5512 COST OF.GOODS�SOL'D LIQUOR 50TH ST'SELLING 1,094.68 251550 1956217 5822:5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH-ST.SELLING 195.63 251551 1956215 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,433.03 251552 1956214 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 133.25 251553 1956213 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,169.15 251553 1956213 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 13.32- 251554 478617 58.42.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 56,605.35 - 342123 12/9/2010 .100919 JOHNSON, NAOMI 2.07 PETTY CASH 251246 113010 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO' 9.46 PETTY CASH. 251246 113010 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 37.35 PETTY CASH 251246 113010 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 43.45 PETTY CASH 251246 113010 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 70.85 PETTY CASH 251246 113010 5101.4413 ARTWORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 98.93 PETTY CASH 251246 113010 5112.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER POTTERY 159.52 PETTY CASH 251246 113010 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 421.63 342124 12/9/2010 101846 JUST FRIENDS BIG BAND 100.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 12/12110 251508 120610 , - 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 100.00 _ 342126 1219/2010 113212 KENDELL DOORS & HARDWARE INC. 20.91 KEY DUPLICATION 251295 97371 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 20.91 342126 12/9/2010 123470 KIDSDANCE 600.00 DJ FOR NEW YEARS EVE 251399 120310 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 600.00 342127 12/9/2010 124002 KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES INC 278.20 50TH & FRANCE LANDSCAPE 251247 . 4313278 01237.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN A -237 50TH &FRANCE; ^ONOVATION - R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1218/2UiU 8:53:24 Council Check Register Page - 15 1213/2010 - 12/9/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 278.20 342128 121912010 122074 KNOLLMAIER, LAURA 181.77 PETTY CASH 251296 120110 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 181.77 342129 121912010 104979 KOCON, ED 87.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 251297 120110 5410.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 87.50 342130 121912010 101602 KONTERS, VIK 239.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 251445 113010 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 239.99 342131 12/9/2010 100364 LAGUNA CLAY CO. 612.00 CLAY 00009288 251248 090359 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 612.00 342132 1219/2010 100850 LAKELAND FLORIST SUPPLY INC. 69.18 HOLIDAY DECORATIONS 00002223 251400 710068 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 128.46 HOLIDAY DECORATIONS 251401 709934 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 197.64 342133 12/9/2010 100606 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 63.21 CITY LOGO CLOTHING 00004218 251076 09615167 1513.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 90.95 CITY LOGO CLOTHING 00004218 251077 09615034 1513.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 54.18- RETURN 00004218 251078 09587809 1513.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 99.98 342134 1219/2010 101220 LANO EQUIPMENT INC. 393.77 LAMP ASSEMBLIES, STROBE 00002015 251446 218934 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 55.93 FILTER 00002015 251447 219340 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 449.70 342135 1219/2010 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 618.62 ADAPTERS, FITTINGS, COUPLERS 00005404 251448 9831370 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 353.72 COTTER PINS 00001963 251449 9749122 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 972.34 342136 1219/2010 100868 LOGIS 480.00 WORKORDER 251249 32964 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 480.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/8/2010 8:53:24 Council Check Register Page - 16 12/312010 - 1219/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 342137 12/9/2010 126208 LOVEJOY, NICHOLAS 40.28 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 251509 113010 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 51.10 CELL PHONE REIMBURSEMENT 251510 120610 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 91.38 342138 121912010 112677 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,935.50 251555 99111 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,935.50 342139 1219/2010 127698 MADD - MN 150.00 CRASH CAR - HOMECOMING WEEK 251450 CC EPD 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 150.00 342140 121912010 100869 MARTIN- MCALLISTER 250.00 ASSESSMENT FEEDBACK 251298 7157 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 250.00 342141 121912010 122878 MART71, DOROTHEA 500.00 HOSTING FEE 251250 151 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 500.00 342142 1219/2010 101146 MATRIX 189.76 251079 607697366 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 189.76 342143 121912010 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 382.50 PHONE SYSTEM TRAINING 251299 56955 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,324.19 PHONES FOR PW 251299 56955 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING 982.18 NEW PHONES 251300 57458 2210.6711 NEW EQUIPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 2,688.87 342144 1219/2010 112360 MAY, DOUG 71.48 LEXAN SHEET FOR WINDOW 251301 112910 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 71.48 342145 12/9/2010 100875 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC. 795.15 PLANTS 00002208 251402 49972 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK 795.15 342146 12/9/2010 101928. MCKENZIE, THOMAS 107.76 UNIFORM PURCHASE 251511 120210 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF E�MA Council Check Register 12/3/2010 - 12/9/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS 12/8%c,.. � 8:53:24 Page - 17 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GENERAL (BILLING) GENERAL MAINTENANCE EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK CENTENNIAL LAKES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL SNOW & ICE REMOVAL SNOW & ICE REMOVAL BRIDGES GUARD RAILS GENERAL MAINTENANCE SNOW & ICE REMOVAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARKS ADMIN EQUIPMENT SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL ELECTION GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 107.76 342147 12/9/2010 124142 MCNAUGHTON, MARY 84.00 INSTRUCTION AC 251251 112910 5110.6103 84.00 342148 12/912010 103944 MED COMPASS 50.00 HEARING TESTS 251185 16794 5910.6103 50.00 342149 12/9/2010 101987 MENARDS 38.09 LIGHTS 00001064 251080 36197 1301.6406 60.87 LIGHTS 00002220 251403 45369 5620.6406 27.99 GLOVES 00002221 251404 45661 5620.6406 24.53 LIGHTS, TOTES 00002221 251405 45845 5620.6406 13.26 CHRISTMAS DECORATIONS 00002221 251406 45803 5620.6406 4.99- RETURN 251407 45660 5620.6406 19.22 ALUMINUM 00002030 251451 45078 5630.6406 178.97 342150 121912010 102281 MENARDS 298.65 BRACKET KIT, GLOVES 00001042 251081 24179 1318.6406 64.02- RETURN 00001042 251082 24193 1318.6406 10.48 FURRING STRIPS 00001038 251083 23828 1318.6406 44.50 CAULK GUN, CEDAR PICKET 00001064 251084 24641 1343.6406 71.31 LUMBER, SCREWS 00001064 251085 23061 1301.6406 71.56 FURRING STRIPS 00001005 251086 17554 1318.6406 54.45 BUILDING MATERIALS 00001989 251452 30622 1646.6406 486.93 342151 12/9/2010 127638 METRO GARAGE DOOR CO. 1,734.00 REPLACE CART GARAGE DOORS 00006130 251302 194397 5430.6180 1,734.00 342162 1219/2010 100885 METRO SALES INC 7,541.10 RICOH COPIER 00004381 251512 32048A 421600.6710 2,320.20 COPIER USAGE 251513 388204 1400.6230 347.34 COPIER RENTAL 251514 36160A 1180.6151 10,208.64 342153 12/912010 104650 MICRO CENTER 556.78 LCD TV & EQUIPMENT 00004387 251303 3009306 1120.6406 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS 12/8%c,.. � 8:53:24 Page - 17 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GENERAL (BILLING) GENERAL MAINTENANCE EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK CENTENNIAL LAKES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL SNOW & ICE REMOVAL SNOW & ICE REMOVAL BRIDGES GUARD RAILS GENERAL MAINTENANCE SNOW & ICE REMOVAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARKS ADMIN EQUIPMENT SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT RENTAL ELECTION GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/8/2010 8:53:24 Council Check Register Page - 18 1213/2010 - 12/912010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 37.40 TV MOUNT 00004392 251304 3043211 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 10.67 SPUTTER FOR PROJECTORS 00004391 251305 3035019 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 53.39 SURGE PROTECTORS 00004391 251305 3035019 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 84.38 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 00009291 251306 3024509 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 742.62 342164 121912010 127263 MID AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTEMS 680.79 SHELVING FOR PW BLDG 00001994 251186 714738 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 274.27 SHELVING FOR NEW PW BLDG 00001038 251307 714870 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 502.89 SHELVING FOR NEW PW BLDG 00001038 251307 714870 421260.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT 6,255.59 SHELVING FOR NEW PW BLDG 00001038 251307 714870 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT 11,800.71 SHELVING FOR NEW PW BLDG 00001038 251307 714870 421600.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARKS ADMIN EQUIPMENT 16,115.26 SHELVING FOR NEW PW BLDG 00001038 251307 714870 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT 20,883.78 SHELVING FOR NEW PW BLDG 00001038 251307 714870 421553.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQ OPER CENTRAL SERV EQUIPMENT 23,638.73 SHELVING FOR NEW PW BLDG 00001038 251307 714870 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT 80,152.02 342156 12/9/2010 127639 MIDWAY FORD 33,005.38 FORD VEHICLE 00005043 251308 83864 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT 37,157.38 FORD VEHICLE 00005043 251309 83863 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT 70,162.76 342156 12/9/2010 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 315.98 ASPHALT 00001224 251252 108368MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 227.75 ASPHALT 00001224 251253 108507MB 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 899.71 ASPHALT 00001224 251254 108664MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 287.72 ASPHALT 00001224 251255 108792MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 659.60 ASPHALT 00001224 251256 108887MB 5913.6518 BLACKTOP DISTRIBUTION 2,390.76 342157 12/9/2010 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 1,175.79 PAPER/CLEANING SUPPLIES 251453 30361 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 1,231.20 PAPERICLEANING SUPPLIES 251453 30361 1551.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,406.99 342168 12/9/2010 102873 MILLER, SUSAN 106.07 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 251408 120310 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 106.07 342159 12/912010 102582 MINN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 40.00 BOILER INSPECTION 251258 B42ABR00146891 5310.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POOL ADMINISTRATION 40.00 BOILER LICENSE 251409 B42ABR00159551 1470.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS FIRE DEPT. GENERAP R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12%8/2010 8:53:24 Council Check Register Page - 19 12/3/2010 - 12/912010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 150.00 BOILER INSPECTION 00008078 251515 B42ABR00160251 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 230.00 342160 121912010 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 980.00 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00001083 251087 33743 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,225.00 REPLACE STAND PIPE 00001084 251257 33745 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,205.00 342161 12/9/2010 101320 MINNEAPOLIS AREA ASSOC OF REAL 111.00 MLS ACCESS FEE 251454 1643455 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 111.00 342162 12/9/2010 101684 MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLICE ASS 180.00 2011 MEMBERSHIP 251187 3100 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 130.00 2011 DUES 251455 3200 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 310.00 342163 121912010 100066 MINNESOTA MAILING SOLUTIONS 281.39 POSTAL MACHINE INK 251188 64717 1400.6235 POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 281.39 342164 12/9/2010 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 11.76 SUCTION HOSE 00005415 251259 0086817 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 18.81 PVC HOSE 00005367 251260 0086821 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 57.71 STEEL PLATE 00005266 251261 0086820 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 117.56 MACHINE WORK 00001028 251456 0086745 -IN 1648.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 205.84 342165 12/9/2010 117016 MOLITOR & ASSOCIATES 47.29 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 251262 4606 CASCO AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 47.29 342166 12/9/2010 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 43.94 SWITCH ASSEMBLY, HOUSING 00005392 251189 485755F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 128.25- CORE RETURN 00005008 251190 CM465812F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 106.88- CORE RETURN 00005221 251191 CM485486F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 108.08 LAMP ASSEMBLY 00005364 251192 486423F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 724.83 CONTROL 00005375 251193 486798F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 641.72 342167 12/9/2010 108668 MORRIS, GRAYLYN 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 12/16/10 251516 120510 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/8/2010 8:53:24 Council Check Register Page - 20 1213/2010 — 12/9/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 150.00 21.41 TORSION SPRINGS 00006365 342168 121912010 5422.6530 100912 MOTOROLA INC. 21.41 342172 9,213.19 DISPATCH SERVICE CONTRACT 251457 13816196 2310.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT E911 50.00 9,213.19 251195 135817 2310.6104 50.00 342169 1219/2010 127766 MOZZA MIA 342173 12/9/2010 127647 NEAL, SCOTT H. 1,375.17 INVESTIGATION FEE REFUND 251577 120610 1120.4314 INVESTIGATION FEE ADMINISTRATION 1,375.17 MEETING EXPENSES 251458 110210 1120.6106 342170 12/912010 120561 MPROA 342174 121912010 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 380.00 2011 MEMBERSHIP 251410 120110 1419.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS RESERVE PROGRAM REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS E911 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS FIRE PREVENTION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT EB /CL BALANCE SHEET 380.00 342171 1219/2010 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 21.41 TORSION SPRINGS 00006365 251194 767074 -01 5422.6530 21.41 342172 12/9/2010 103666 NATIONAL ACADEMIES OF EMERGENC 50.00 EMD RECERTIFICATION 251195 135817 2310.6104 50.00 342173 12/9/2010 127647 NEAL, SCOTT H. 61.65 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 251263 113010 1120.6107 73.11 MEETING EXPENSES 251458 110210 1120.6106 134.76 342174 121912010 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 73.50 251129 63052 5842.5513 73.50 342175 1219/2010 100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 1,583.80 SIGNS 00001026 251264 TI -0229108 1325.6531 1,583.80 342176 12/9/2010 102651 NFPA 257.35 PUBLIC EDUCATION BROCHURES 00003844 251310 5054616Y 1470.6614 257.35 342177 12/912010 127709 NORCOSTCO INC. 18,850.00 THEATER CURTAIN REPLACEMENT00002105 251411 118848 5600.1740 18,850.00 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS E911 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS FIRE PREVENTION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT EB /CL BALANCE SHEET R55CKREG• LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 12/3/2010 - 12/9/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 342178 12/9/2010 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPP 2,226.16 STEEL TUBES, CHANNELS 00005332 251196 190667 1553.6585 2,226.16 342179 12/9/2010 102199 NORTHERN SAFETY CO. INC. 177.94 SAFETY EYEWEAR 00003840 251311 P286903101011 1470.6510 177.94 342180 1219/2010 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 235.70 STROBE TUBES. 00005370 251265 25891 1553.6530 2,838.7.1 LIGHT BAR FOR E -83 00003853 251312 25791, 1470.6406 3,074.41 342181 12/9/2010 102662 NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP. 605.34 DE -ICER 00001164 251459 5035186 1318.6525 605.34 342182 12/912010 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY CO. 148.84 CANVAS, PADS 00009293 251266 39796500 5120.5510 148.84 342183 12/9/2010 106007 NU- TELECOM - 557.72 DEC PSAP MAINTENANCE 251460 80317618 1400.6230 557.72 342184 12/9/2010 116114 OCE 59.84 NOV 2010.MAINTENANCE 251267 987311977 1552.6103 161.17 NOV MAINTENANCE 251517 987305726 1495.6103 J 221.01 342186 12/912010 103578 OFFICEDEPOT 35.34 BADGES 00009185 251268 1276216908' 5110.6406 29.82 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00006034 251313 1281770264 5410.6513 65.16 342186 12/9/2010 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 197.72 CUTOFF WHEELS 00001847 251088 617650 5913.6406 118.09 RIGGING 00001979 251197 617932 1646.6406 315.81 342187 12/9/2010 102266 OLSON, TIM Subledger Account Description' ACCESSORIES FIRST AID SUPPLIES 12/8/2010 8:53:24 Page - 21 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES-: FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES . GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 12/3/2010 - 1219/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 447.48 UNIFORM PURCHASE 251518 120610 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 1218/2010 8:53:24 Page - 22 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 1648.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES 1301.6180 382.50 251130 447.48 5842.5513 4.53 251131 342188 12/9/2010 2,169.28 115669 ON CALL SERVICES 8284554 -IN 5862.5513 105.25 251338 626.00 BOILER CAPILIGHT FIXT REPAIR 251412 2123 8284537 -IN 5842.5513 626.00 342189 12/9/2010 101484 OSWALD HOSE & ADAPTERS 354.83 FABRICATE FLOODING HOSE 00001992 251461 9181 354.83 342190 12/9/2010 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 1,495.00 872.33 FURNACE REPAIR 00002027 251269 37735 490.00 872.33 251315 86 342191 12/9/2010 127718 OZASKY, ROBERT 342197 1219/2010 21.60 SNOWPLOW INCIDENT 251519 120410 444.00 21.60 251132 2993906 342192 1219/2010 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1218/2010 8:53:24 Page - 22 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 1648.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES 1301.6180 382.50 251130 8284080 -IN 5842.5513 4.53 251131 8277112 -IN 5842.5512 2,169.28 251337 8284554 -IN 5862.5513 105.25 251338 8284550 -IN 5822.5513 3,820.54 251556 8284537 -IN 5842.5513 5910.6155 1120.4314 4402.6710 01359.1705.20 5842.5513 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BANK SERVICES CHARGES INVESTIGATION FEE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CONSULTING DESIGN YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING GENERAL (BILLING) ADMINISTRATION PW BUILDING BA -359 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6,482.10 342193 12/912010 125492 PAYPAL INC. 39.95 VSV0002830598 FEE 251270 9415927 39.95 342194 12/9/2010 127769 PEOPLE'S ORGANIC 1,454.53 INVESTIGATON FEE REFUND 251578 120610 1,454.53 342195 12/9/2010 100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS 1,495.00 REMOVE BERM 251314 87 490.00 LANDSCAPING 251315 86 1,985.00 342197 1219/2010 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 444.00 251132 2993906 5910.6155 1120.4314 4402.6710 01359.1705.20 5842.5513 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BANK SERVICES CHARGES INVESTIGATION FEE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CONSULTING DESIGN YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING GENERAL (BILLING) ADMINISTRATION PW BUILDING BA -359 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1213/2010 - 12/9/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 360.49 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 251133 2993698 5842.5513 YORK SELLING 4,021.61 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 251134 2993700 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1.12 251135 2993697 5842.5513 1.12 251136 2993696 5842.5512 1,081.51 251137 2993699 5842.5512 2,687.44 251138 2993702 5842.5512 35.42- 251139 3444071 5842.5513 4.00- 251140 3444077 5842.5513 1,015.33 251339 2997239 5862.5513 361.16 251340 2997241 5862.5513 86.36 251341 2997235 5862.5513 56.12 251342 2997240 5862.5512 37.42- 251343 3448649 5822.5512 776.46 251557 2997231 5822.5513 553.72 251558 2997232 5822.5513 195.36 251559 2997233 5842.5512 1,133.43 251560 2997237 5842.5512 1,511.63 251561 2997236 5842.5513 1,596.78 251562 2997238 5842.5513 4,279.14 251563 2997234 5842.5513 20,085.94 342198 12/9/2010 111779 PIONEER RESEARCH CORPORATION 2,789.58 SALT 00001160 251462 217996 1318.6525 2,789.58 342199 12/912010 100968 PLUNKETTS PEST CONTROL 44.52 PEST CONTROL 251413 2033800 7411.6103 44.52 342200 12/9/2010 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 218.74 TIRES 00005296 251198 98738 1553.6583 184.79 TIRES 00005219 251414 106335 1553.6583 866.64 TIRES 00005419 251463 104987 1553.6583 1,270.17 342201 12/912010 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 2,600.00 PERMIT #939 UTILITY BILLING 251271 120210 5910.6235 2,600.00 342202 121912010 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 350.00 NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 251464 120610 1628.6235 12/8/2010 8:53:24 Page - 23 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POSTAGE GENERAL (BILLING) POSTAGE SENIOR CITIZENS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/8/2010 8:53:24 Council Check Register Page - 24 12/3/2010 - 12/9/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 350.00 342203 1219/2010 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 19.00 BLADE SHARPENING 00001993 251465 250869 1648.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 19.00 342204 12/9/2010 105690 PRO -TEC DESIGN INC. 141.16 SOFTWARE INSTALLATION 251316 56660 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 13,455.42 SECURITY ACCESS SYSTEM 00001197 251415 56454 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING 13,596.58 342205 121912010 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 602.24 ICE MELT 00002031 251466 5034 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 602.24 342206 12/9/2010 111600 PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER INC. 417.56 STREAMLIGHT BATTERIES 251199 5208391 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 417.56 342207 12/9/2010 122988 PUBLIC SURPLUS 3,388.00 AUCTION SALE OF FUEL TANKS 00001231 251416 281774 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT 3,388.00 342208 12/9/2010 100971 QUALITY WINE 100.00- 251141 380665 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,925.33 251344 389185 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,148.14 251345 389241 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 18.60 251346 389186 -CO 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,061.60 251347 389090 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,562.50 251348 389059 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 417.58 251349 389091 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,792.77 251350 389092 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,184.00 251351 389242 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,080.10 251352 369187 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 695.83 251353 389060 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 232.20 251354 389188 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 283.73 251355 389243 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 741.60 251564 390280 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 100.00- 251565 • 380378 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 15,943.98 342209 1219/2010 123898 QWEST R55CKREG LOG20000 437.86 CITY OF EUINA 342210 12/9/2010 104642 RCM SPECIALTIES INC. Council Check Register 1,004.56 CRS2 12/3/2010. - 12/9/2010 3079 Check # Date Amount . Supplier / Explanation . PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 40.01 952;922 -9246 251467 9246 -11/10 1400.6188 TELEPHONE 55.54 952 929 -0297 251468 0297 -11/10 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 342.31 952 927 -8861 251469 8861 -11/10 1550.6188 TELEPHONE 1301.6519 2210.6575 5620.5510 5620.5510 1470.6406 5511.6406 1160.6107 1160.6105 5422.6182 1318.6406 1318.6406 08043.1705.24 08049.1705.24 04297.1705.24 03413.1705.24 ROAD OIL PRINTING COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE DUES,& SUBSCRIPTIONS RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL, SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT 1218/2010 8:53:24 Page - 25 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE COMMUNICATIONS EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS FINANCE FINANCE MAINT OF COURSE &GROUNDS SNOW & ICE REMOVAL SNOW & ICE REMOVAL L-43 COUNTRY CLUB L-49 PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO'ST PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO SS 437.86 342210 12/9/2010 104642 RCM SPECIALTIES INC. 1,004.56 CRS2 00001161 251470 3079 1,004.56 342211 1219/2010 122006 REALM PROMOTIONS 2,250.00 PLAYING CARDS 251272 8765 2,250.00 342212 12/9/2010 126343 RICHFIELD DQ GRILL AND CHILL 18.99 BLIZZARD CAKE 251417 536 15.99 CAKE 251418 537 34.98 342213 12/912010 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 74.60 SOFTENER SALT 00003648 251317 00243955 614.54 SOFTENER SALT 00008069 251520 00244106 689.14 342214 12/9/2010 118779 ROGGEMAN, ERIC 18.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 251200 112410 151.00 CPA LICENSE 251200 112410 169.00 342215 1219/2010 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 396.06 PARTS WASHER SERVICE 251201 52440587 396.06 342216 12/9/2010 106442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 164.56 LUMBER, SCREWS; BITS 251089 40893576 11.05 CABINET SCREWS ° 00001039 251090 40692827 175.61 342217 1219/2010 100996 SEH 52.07 CONTRY CLUB CONSTRUCTION 251273 237811 69.43 CONTRY CLUB CONSTRUCTION 251273 237811 156.22 CONTRY CLUB CONSTRUCTION 251273 237811 243.01 CONTRY CLUB CONSTRUCTION 251273 237811 1301.6519 2210.6575 5620.5510 5620.5510 1470.6406 5511.6406 1160.6107 1160.6105 5422.6182 1318.6406 1318.6406 08043.1705.24 08049.1705.24 04297.1705.24 03413.1705.24 ROAD OIL PRINTING COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE DUES,& SUBSCRIPTIONS RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL, SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT 1218/2010 8:53:24 Page - 25 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE COMMUNICATIONS EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS FINANCE FINANCE MAINT OF COURSE &GROUNDS SNOW & ICE REMOVAL SNOW & ICE REMOVAL L-43 COUNTRY CLUB L-49 PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO'ST PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO SS R55CKREG LOG20000 i i ur �uuvn Check # Date 342218 12/912010 342219 1219/2010 101000 SIR SPEEDY 755.97 BUSINESS CARD SHELLS 755.97 342220 1219/2010 Council Check Register 343.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 12/3/2010 - 1219/2010 343.50 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 390.55 CONTRY CLUB CONSTRUCTION 251273 237811 01214.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT 390.55 CONTRY CLUB CONSTRUCTION 251273 237811 01213.1705.24 CONSULTING =NSTR MGMT 433.94 CONTRY CLUB CONSTRUCTION 251273 237811- 05436.1705.24 CONSULTING'CONSTR MGMT 23,367.91 MINNEHAHA NEIGHBORHOOD 251471 237820 01334.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 211:85 PAMELA PK NEIGH IMPROV 251472 237813 03449.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 465.68, PAMELA PK NEIGH IMPROV 251472 237813 05492.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 1,726.81 'PAMELA PK NEIGH IMPROV 251472 237813 04358:1705:21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 3,885.32 PAMELA PK NEIGH IMPROV 251472 237813 01360.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 1,011.49 RIDGE RD RECONSTR 251488 237819 -= 03461':1705.20 -'CONSULTING DESIGN 1,685.83 RIDGE RD RECONSTR 251488 237819 05510.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 11,463.60 RIDGE RD RECONSTR 251488 237819' 01384:1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 19,555.56 RIDGE RD RECONSTR 251488 237819 04374.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 65,109.82 101862 SEVEN CORNERS HARDWARE INC. 543.47 LADDER, TOOLS 00001071 251202 150124 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 543.47 101000 SIR SPEEDY 755.97 BUSINESS CARD SHELLS 755.97 342220 1219/2010 101632 SMITH, CECELIA 343.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 343.50 342221 1219/2010 127737 SONOSITE 20,100.00 SONOSITE MICROMAXX 20,100.00 342222 12/9/2010 104672 SPRINT 39.99 DATA CARDS 39.99 DATA CARDS 79.98 342223 1219/2010 101004 SPS COMPANIES 309.47 COUPLINGS, ANCHORS 102.82 SPINDLES 412.29 251318 67017 251419 120410 00003826 251521 29279 1550.6406 1120.6107 421470.6710 251091 666109817 -036 1322.6188 251091 666109817 -036 5913.6188 00001022 251092 S2286698.001 00002216 251420 S2293721.001 1375.6406 5620.6406 342224 12/9/2010 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC. 110.17 WIPER BLADES 00005374 251203 S182629 1553.6530 GENERAL SUPPLIES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TELEPHONE TELEPHONE GENE RAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR.PARTS 12/8/2010 8:53:24 Page - 26 Business Unit PHASE 2.DREXEL, WOODDALE' EDIN PHASE `1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO WM BA -334 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON SS-449 PAMELA PARK WM -492 PAMELA PARK STS--358 PAMELA PARK BA -360 PAMELA - PARK N'HOOD SS -461 RIDGE RD RECONSTRUCTION WM -510 RIDGE RD RECONSTRUCTION RIDGE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION STS - 374 RIDGE ROAD STREET RENOVATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ADMINISTRATION FIRE EQUIPMENT i- STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL DISTRIBUTION PARKING RAMP EDINBOROUGH PARK EQUIPMENT OPERA7, -" ,GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 342228 12/9/2010 104349 STRUCTURED NETWORK SOLUTIONS Council Check Register 445.00 BLDG DEPT RE- WIRING 251274 14230 12/3/2010 - 12/9/2010 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 668.64 3.99 LEVER 00005422 251204 5182495 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 2,298.46 282.53 PARTS BOOK 00005416 251205 5182496 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 342229 12/9/2010 50.34 FILTERS 00005421 251206 5182663 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 300.00 108.20 BULBS, SPRAY PAINT 00005339 251207 5182683 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 105.62 8.42 BULBS 00005381 251421 5182781 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 83.60 563.65 00005336 251097 277090 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 342225 1219/2010 SPEAKER 100650 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 544.94 10.23 KEYS 251473 CH- 546952 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 342230 121912010 10.23 342226 12/9/2010 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 1218/2010 8:53:24 Page - 27 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,545.00 WANT ADS 251422 113010 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,545.00 342227 12/9/2010 117992 STRINGER BUSINESS SYSTEMS 2.31 COPIER SERVICE 251093 7536002 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 6.46 COPIER SERVICE 251094 7861164 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 8.77 342228 12/9/2010 104349 STRUCTURED NETWORK SOLUTIONS 445.00 BLDG DEPT RE- WIRING 251274 14230 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,184.82 CABLE TV WIRING 251319 14229 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 668.64 CITY HALL WIRING REPAIR 251320 14299 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,298.46 342229 12/9/2010 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 300.00 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005414 251095 582721 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 105.62 MIRROR 00005065 251096 277177 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 83.60 MIRROR 00005336 251097 277090 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 55.72 SPEAKER 00005181 251474 268006 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 544.94 342230 121912010 100693 SULLIVAN, JOSEPH F INSPECTIONS COMMUNICATIONS CENT SERV GEN - MIS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 300.00 HISTORICAL COLUMN 251208 314 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 300.00 342231 12/9/2010 101910 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC. 640.00 MOBILE FIELD REPORT TRAINING 251209 28535 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 640.00 342232 12/9/2010 110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 12/3/2010 — 12/9/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 47.24 CELL PHONE CLIP 00001162 251475 28662 1301.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TOOLS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 12/8/2010 8:53:24 Page - 28 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION PAMELA PARK HOCKEY RINK SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES YORK OCCUPANCY SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 47.24 342233 12/912010 101027 TARGET BANK 93.85 X- XXX -XX9 -840 SUPPLIES 251210 111810 5410.6406 93.85 342234 12/9/2010 113649 TENNIS WEST 7,571.95 INSTALL HOCKEY RINK FENCING 00001117 251476 10- 777 -2227 47069.6710 7,571.95 342235 12/9/2010 101029 TESSMAN SEED CO. 137.87 SNOW SHOVELS 00001998 251477 S136355 -IN 1648.6556 137.87 342236 1219/2010 101826 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP. 553.13 ELEVATOR MAINTENANCE 251321 702967 1470.6215 553.13 342237 121912010 127318 TIGER ATHLETICS INC. 300.00 FITNESS TRAINING 251322 341 1470.6104 300.00 342238 12/9/2010 101474 TITLEIST 76.56 GOLF BALLS 251478 2118566 5440.5511 76.56 342239 1219/2010 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLAN 2,797.22 BRIDGE MGMT SERVICES 251275 000201003543 1260.6103 2,797.22 342240 12/9/2010 101047 TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO 354.83 OPENER 00002024 251479 341546 5630.6406 354.83 342241 12/9/2010 104241 UNIVERSAL SIGNS INC 810.86 SIGN REPAIRS 251098 45038 5841.6180 810.86 342242 12/9/2010 101066 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 70.00 TRAFFIC SIGN CLASS 00001058 251099 EM092210 1280.6104 70.00 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TOOLS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 12/8/2010 8:53:24 Page - 28 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION PAMELA PARK HOCKEY RINK SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES YORK OCCUPANCY SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EuINA 12/8/2u'i0 8:53:24 Council Check Register Page - 29 12/3/2010 - 12/9/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doe No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 342243 12/912010 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 181.83 FLOODING EQUIPMENT 00001987 251480 283289 1648.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 181.83 342244 12/9/2010 100060 LISPS- HASLER 4.000.00 ACCT #75983 251579 120710 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 4.000.00 342246 12/912010 122564 VALLEY NATIONAL GASES LLC 185.04 OXYGEN 00003649 251323 645604 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 74.44 OXYGEN 00003649 251481 825617 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 259.48 342246 12/9/2010 116380 VARITECH INDUSTRIES INC. 607.57 LITTLE GIANT PUMP 00001163 251482 119625 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW 810E REMOVAL 607.57 342247 121912010 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 32.52 251100 2486378637 5952.6188 TELEPHONE RECYCLING 67.11 251100 2486378637 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 77.51 251100 2486378637 1120.6188 TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION 81.27 251100 2486378637 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 140.97 251100 2486378637 1600.6188 TELEPHONE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 284.67 251100 2486378637 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 93.77 251211 2485511486 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 777.82 342248 12/9/2010 126327 VINOANDES 285.15 251142 1839 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 285.15 342249 1219/2010 119464 VINOCOPIA 173.25 251566 0032955 -IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 173.25 342250 12/9/2010 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 15.45 LIGHTING 00001056 251212 15168505 -00 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 120.56 LIGHTING 00001056 251212 15168505 -00 5431.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 319.09 LIGHTING 00001056 251212 15168505 -00 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 455.10 - R55CKREG LOG20000 WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 12/3/2010 - 12/9/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 342251 12/9/2010 126.54 101685 WEEKEND FREEDOM 251145 493386 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 149.83 SNOW BLOWER REPAIR 00002215 251423 64487 5620.6406 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 149.83 251147 493387 5842.5513 342252 12/912010 36.08- 104630 WEXLER, ARDIS 251148 816675 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 528.00 RECOUNT ELECTION JUDGE 251576 120610 1180.6010 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 528.00 251364 492861 5862.5513 342253 12/912010 105613 WICKLUND, MITZI 87.50 MEETING EXPENSES 251522 120610 1190.6107 103.33 MEETING EXPENSES 251522 120610 1190.6106 190.83 342254 121912010 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 523.55 251356 257282 -00 5842.5513 1,637.45 251357 257280 -00 5862.5513 772.88 251358 257277 -00 5822.5513 2,933.88 342256 1219/2010 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 20.68- 251143 49970 5842.5513 81.12- 251144 51131 5822.5513 510.83 251359 342495 5862.5513 5,943.88 251360 342497 5862.5513 627.00- 251361 49630 5862.5513 130.24- 251362 51199 5862.5513 479.23 251567 342493 5822.5513 1.12 251568 342494 5842.5513 2,356.76 251569 342496 5842.5513 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES 12/8/2010 8:53:24 Page - 30 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES ELECTION MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING MEETING EXPENSE ASSESSING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 342256 12/9/2010 117482 WINECONNECT INC. 159.24 ONLINE ORDER SITE 251276 699 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 159.24 342257 12/9/2010 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 126.54 251145 493386 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 719.02 251146 492862 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 253.08 251147 493387 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 36.08- 251148 816675 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 7,930.22 251363 494794 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 191.85 251364 492861 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/8/2010 8:53:24 Council Check Register Page - 31 12/3/2010 - 12/9/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,219.61 251365 493385 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 9,355.20 251366 494789 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 15,097.42 251367 494792 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8,821.54 251368 494798 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 16,165.35 251369 494795 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 244.59 251370 494796 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 7,705.91 251371 494790 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,518.94 251570 496557 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 15,771.63 251571 494797 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 169.10- 251572 816828 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 84,915.72 342268 12/9/2010 124629 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 789.55 251149 685540 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 60.00 251150 686202 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 64.50 251151 686203 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,181.00 251152 685686 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,140.15 251153 685459 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,210.15 251372 686201 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,792.00 251373 685539 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,164.56 251573 687902 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,048.80 251574 687692 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,869.25 251575 685296 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 17,319.96 342269 12/9/2010 101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY 241.09 GOLF CLUBS 251483 250984 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 241.09 342260 12/9/2010 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 371.85 251374 257833 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD VINE YORK SELLING 196.62 251375 257834 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 85.95 251376 257832 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 654.42 342261 12/912010 101726 XCEL ENERGY 58.87 51- 4420190 -3 251101 261845847 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 48.34 51- 9422326 -6 251102 261957779 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 59.71 51- 6692497-0 251103 262073706 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 229.29 51- 8987646 -8 251104 261925729 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 203.83 51- 9337452 -8 251105 261936120 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 74.83 51- 9608462 -5 251106 261942583 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 121312010 - 1219/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,303.18 51- 5547446 -1 251107 261865378 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER 25.78 51- 8976004 -9 251108 261928849 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 197.95 51- 4621797 -2 251109 261691243 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 943.97 51- 4966303 -6 251110 261315183 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER 318.94 51- 9013604 -6 251213 262348572 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER 503.91 51 -4827232 -6 251214 262339482 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER 35.80 51- 8102668 -0 251215 262342858 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 31,261.52 51 -4621797 -2 251216 262344800 1321.6185 LIGHT &POWER 136.50 51- 5938955 -6 251484 262425016 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER 356.66 51- 6046826 -0 251485 262425118 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER 145.51 51- 6229265 -9 251486 262426960 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER 1,615.42 51- 6229265 -9 251486 262426960 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER 794.99 51- 5847121 -5 251523 262574613 5914.6185 LIGHT & POWER 17,375.22 51 -4888627 -1 251524 262560597 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER 55,690.22 342262 1219/2010 1,784.39 1,784.39 342263 12/912010 8,579.66 8,579.66 342264 12/9/2010 196.08 196.08 342265 12/9/2010 100.11 100.11 342266 12/912010 2,940.00 2,940.00 839,836.77 103684 XPEDX STOCK FOR CITY LETTERHEAD 251277 9012440376 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. DIESEL FUEL 00001010 251278 411225 122316 ZACK'S INC. RINK TOOLS 00001999 251487 26408 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE FIRST AID SUPPLIES 00008072 251217 54066654 127761 MNOSHA OSHA CITATION 00001232 251580 315052928 Grand Total 12/8/2010 8:53:24 Page - 32 Business Unit SENIOR CITIZENS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR TRAFFIC SIGNALS DISTRIBUTION POOL OPERATION STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STREET LIGHTING REGULAR AQUATIC WEEDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS YORK FIRE STATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1648.6556 TOOLS SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 5510.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT ARENA ADMINISTRATION 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 839,836.77 Total Payments 839,836.77 DISTRIBUTION R55CKSUM LOu/0000 a CITY OF F-NA 12/8/2u iu 8:54:24 Council Check Summary Page - 1 1213/2010 - 1219/2010 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 136,360.26 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 5,876.66 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 9,263.19 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 98,655.21 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 186,554.59 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 23,367.91 05100 ART CENTER FUND 2,892.64 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 66.03 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 543.91 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 5,749.85 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 20,675.89 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 40,580.74 05800 LIQUOR FUND 267,134.70 05900 UTILITY FUND 19,298.95 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 21,438.59 05950 RECYCLING FUND 32.52 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 1,345.13 , Report Totals 839,836.77 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing polices nd nrocedures,date A,2-1 `� 110 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY L,. -ijINA Council Check Register 12/16/2010 - 12/16/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 342286 12/16/2010 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY i 18.40 251724 0808216 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 77.00 251725 0724889 5862.5515 COST OF-GOODS SOLD MIX I 26.25 251726 0808124 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX i 51.20 251966 0724935 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX i 14.00 251967 0724934 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 186.85 342287 12/16/2010 100068 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 37,683.00 RECYCLING 251782 2361456 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES 37,683.00 342288 12116/2010 102382 ANDERSON, MOLLY 39.53 FRANKLIN COVEY SUPPLIES 251676 120810 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 39.53 342289 12/16/2010 101772 APCO INTERNATIONAL INC 69.00 MEMBERSHIP - L. DRAPER 251783 340587 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 23.00 MEMBERSHIP - J. ISKIERKA 251784 366303 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 92.00 342290 12/16/2010 102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE 838.00 FOOD 00006333 251785. 1470967 5421.5510 COST OF. GOODS SOLD 838.00 342291 12/16/2010 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 258.00 DUMPSTER FOR OLD PW 00001334 251677 1095196 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS 258.00 342292 12/16/2010 119168 ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 3,200.45 PREMIUM - POLICY 66199 251817 120110 9900.2033.16 LTD - 99 3,200.45 342293 12/16/2010 126019 B & B PRODUCTS / RIGS AND SQUA 803.58 SQUAD REPAIRS 251609 3405 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 120.00 REPAIR SIREN /SWITCH BOX 251678 3407 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 923.58 342296 12/16/2010 101356 BELLBOY CORPORATION 12i „201014:53:27 Page- 1 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING RECYCLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL CENT SVC PW BUILDING PAYROLL CLEARING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 886.20 251727 56041300 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 128.55 251728 56036500. 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 292.55 251729 56041100 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Checkj# Date 342296 12116/2010 342297 12/16/2010 342298. 12/16/2010 342299 12116/2010 342300 12/1612010 t 12,533.52 100661 - BENN, BRADLEY CITY OF EDINA 82.55 ART WORK SOLD Council Check Register 120910 82.55 12/16/2010 - 12/16/2010 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 128.55 251730 56036400 5822.5512 593.95 251731 56036700 5822.5513 50.63 251732 84537100 5822.5515 340.97 251733 6014200 5862.5515 3.84 251734 84504600 5862.5515 30.43 251735 84537000 5862.5515 52.00 251736 84509600 .5862.6512 107.34 251736 84509600 5862.5515 112.00 251737 84509800 5862.6512 1,413.40 251830 56036600 5862:5513 674.06 251831 56036300 5842.5512 1,784.40 251832 56041200 5842:5512 177.36 251833 84536800 5842.5515 ._ 197.99 251834 84536900 5840.6406 227.75 251968 56147500 5842.5512 629.25 - 251969 56149700 5842.5512 3,593.30 251970 56147400 5842.5513 478.20 251971 56149600 5862.5512 121.10 251972 56135800 5822.5513 450,65 251973 56149500 5822.5512 59.05 251974 84571300 5822.5515 12,533.52 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX PAPER SUPPLIES COST -OF GOODS SOLD MIX PAPER SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST,OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF'GOODS.SOLD LIQUOR COST OF'GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 12/14/201014:53:27 Page - 2 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST.SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON,SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 100661 - BENN, BRADLEY 82.55 ART WORK SOLD 251902 120910 82.55 101191 BENNEROTTE, JENNIFER 53.81 NOV MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 251679 120710 53.81 117697 BENSON, NANCY 69.55 ART WORK SOLD 251903 121010 69.55 123989 BIG SKY RACKS INC 257.95 MOUNT FOR SQUAD 00003171 251680 58616 257.95 127771 BIUNNO, LYNETTE 50.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 251681 120710 50.00 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX PAPER SUPPLIES COST -OF GOODS SOLD MIX PAPER SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST,OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF'GOODS.SOLD LIQUOR COST OF'GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 12/14/201014:53:27 Page - 2 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST.SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON,SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 - CITY t,. _ -jINA 342304 12116/2010 Council Check Register 12/16/2010 - 12/16/2010 SR CTR DECORATIONS Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 342301 12/16/2010 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 342306 12116/2010 8.84 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 251682 64580 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS 12.67 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 251682 64580 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 16.27 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 251682 64580 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 37.78 12/16/2010 103254 BRO -TEX INC. 342302 12/16/2010 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 230.32 RECYCLEIREFILL SORBENTS 00005427 251689 1,648.65 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003839 251683 87203169 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 344.34 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003717 251684 87205025 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 801.42 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003718 251685 87205027 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 2,415.00 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003850 251686 87205026 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 218.12 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003850 251687 87205423 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 2,296.62 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003851 251919 87207222 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 7,724.15 53.46 PORTRAIT FRAME 251690 342303 12116/2010 1100.6406 119361 BOURGET IMPORTS 53.46 11 j1014:53:27 Page - 3 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING ENGINEERING GENERAL DISTRIBUTION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 892.00 251835 101733 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING SENIOR CITIZENS CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER REVENUES CITY COUNCIL 1,025.05 251738 13830 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 892.00 342304 12116/2010 124864 BOWMAN, LINDEN 74.04 SR CTR DECORATIONS 251786 120210 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 74.04 342306 12116/2010 103239 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO. 454.00 INSTALL DOOR CLOSER 00001050 251688 514721S 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS 454.00 342306 12/16/2010 103254 BRO -TEX INC. 230.32 RECYCLEIREFILL SORBENTS 00005427 251689 395951 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS 230.32 342307 12/16/2010 103996 BRYAN, LINDA NELSON 62.89 ART WORK SOLD 251904 121010 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 62.89 342308 12116/2010 115346 CALHOUN BEACH FRAMING 53.46 PORTRAIT FRAME 251690 020000687 1100.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 53.46 342309 12/16/2010 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES SENIOR CITIZENS CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER REVENUES CITY COUNCIL 1,025.05 251738 13830 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/14/201014:53:27 Council Check Register Page - 4 12/16/2010 - 12/16/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 16.20 251739 13828 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,920.40 251740 13833 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 357.30 251836 13850 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,318.95 342310 12/1612010 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 964.00 251741 88619 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 964.00 342311 12/16/2010 116363 CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS INC. 499.21 ENVELOPES 251818 28901 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 252.49 PUBLIC HEARING ENVELOPES 251819 28900 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 751.70 342312 12/16/2010 119726 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 448.75 251975 433565 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 277.38 251976 433092 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 726.13 342313 12/16/2010 118680 CITY OF EDINA 19,730.25 251787 120610 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 19,730.25 342314 12/16/2010 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 207.99 65% OF XCEL FOR STORM LS 00001088 251610 4718 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 207.99 342316 12/1612010 105693 CITYSPRINT 69.50 COURIER SERVICE 251611 20717 1180.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION 69.50 342316 1211612010 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 201,601.70 SCBA 00003762 251920 136018 421470.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT 201,601.70 342317 12/1612010 100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 700.70 251837 0178165028 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 700.70 342318 12/1612010 101346 COLOURS 203.00 CITY COUNCIL BROCHURE UPDATE 251691 10228 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 203.00 - R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY v, �OINA Council Check Register 12/16/2010 — 12/16/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1 342319 12/1612010 120433 COMCAST 82.59 8772 10 614 0164959 251788 164959- 11/10 5430.6188 TELEPHONE 59.00 8772 10 614 0199138 251921 199138 -11/10 5422.6188 TELEPHONE ADVERTISING OTHER GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSULTING DESIGN REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES ART WORK SOLD 12/14/201014:53:27 Page - 5 Business Unit RICHARDS GOLF COURSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GOLF ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL STS -342 SW EDINA PONDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING ART CENTER REVENUES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 141.59 342320 12/16/2010 120826 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT 456.00 GOLF COURSE AD 00006177 251922 315857 5410.6122 456.00 342321 12/16/2010 127817 CORIDIAN TECHNOLOGIES INC. 1,803.27 BAR CODE SCANNER 00003855 251923 54424 1470.6406 1,803.27 342322 12/16/2010 127818 CURB CREATIONS 475.00 REPAIRS AT 5731 LONG BRAKE CIR 251924 051310 04342.1705.20 475.00 342323 12/1612010 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. INC. 343.40 FUEL PUMP 00006365 251925 151975 5422.6530 343.40 342324 12/16/2010 102791 D2 SERVICES INC. 1,178.38 CONTROLLER FOR SOFTWARE 00001093 251692 9971 5913.6180 1,178.38 342326 12116/2010 104020 DALCO 905.98 TISSUE, TOWELS, GLASS CLEANEW0008065 251612 2276898 5511.6511 194.82 HAND TOWELS, WIPES 00001454 251693 2248038 1552.6406 184.89 AIR FRESHENER 00005117 251694 2248688 4090.6406 90.71 HAND TOWELS 00001454 251695 2256126 1552.6406 1,376.40 342326 12/16/2010 103176 DANICIC, JOHN 89.70 ART WORK SOLD 251905 121010 5101.4413 89.70 342327 12/16/2010 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 1,460.20 251742 579985 5842.5514 2,563.75 251743 579984 5822.5514 1,435.80 251977 579983 5862.5514 5,459.75 ADVERTISING OTHER GENERAL SUPPLIES CONSULTING DESIGN REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES ART WORK SOLD 12/14/201014:53:27 Page - 5 Business Unit RICHARDS GOLF COURSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GOLF ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL STS -342 SW EDINA PONDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING ART CENTER REVENUES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/14/201014:53:27 Council Check Register Page - 6 12/16/2010 —12/16/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier./ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit i 342328 12/1612010 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 22.54 NEEDLE NOSE SET 00005066 251696 536856 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 78.51 SOCKET SET, BIT SET 00005067 251697 537108 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 101.05 342329 12/16/2010 122136 DENFELD, SCOTT 61.03 PROPS 251820 120910 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 75.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 251820 120910 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 136.53 342330 12116/2010 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 2,699.07 00006175 251926 110311893 -11/10 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 2,699.07 342331 12/16/2010 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES 3,810.64 CHEMICALS 00001215 251698 82701926 -10 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 3,810.64 342332 12/16/2010 127810 ELFSTRUM, JEFF 98.00 WINTER CLASS REFUND 251789 120710 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 98.00 342333 12/16/2010 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 6,592.00 NOVEMBER BILLINGS 251647 120610 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 6,592.00 342334 12/16/2010 104196 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 315.00 251744 W- 288813 5662.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 315.00 342336 12/16/2010 102101 FEDEX OFFICE 41.84 KIOSK 00006170 251927 131200003971 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 41.84 342336 12/16/2010 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. 425.00 ROWAY 251928 20600 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 425.00 ROWAY 251929 20625 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 850.00 342337 12/16/2010 123818 FLEURY, CYNTHIA 94.25 ART WORK SOLD 251906 121010 5101.4413 ARTWORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY U. _JINA 12/14/201014:53:27 Council Check Register Page - 7 12/16/2010 - 12/16/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 94.25 342338 12116/2010 106824 FLYING CLOUD ANIMAL HOSPITAL 117.30 K9 EXAMINATION 251613 372190 4607.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 117.30 342339 12/16/2010 121634 FORMS & SYSTEMS OF MINNESOTA 1,731.38 SQUAD THERMAL ROLLS 251699 119707 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,731.38 342340 12/16/2010 122086 FULGENCY, E. 57.65 ART WORK SOLD 251907 121010 5101.4413 ARTWORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 57.85 342341 12/1612010 127816 GIEFER, TIM 61.75 ART WORK SOLD 251908 121010 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 61.75 342342 12/16/2010 118941 GLOBALSTAR USA 28.96 R -91 PHONE 251930 2662839 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 28.96 342343 1211612010 111092 GOTZSCHE, OTTO 85.80 ART WORK SOLD 251909 121010 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 85.80 342344 12/16/2010 101103 GRAINGER 97.93 BATTERY CHARGER, BOXES 00001074 251700 9406301961 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 100.89 LIGHT BULBS 00006483 251931 9396660228 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 198.82 342346 12/1612010 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 980.25 251838 124603 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,611.75 251839 124851 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 865.75 251840 124854 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 294.75 251978 124853 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,752.50 342346 12/16/2010 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 169.77 REGISTER TAPE 00007516 251614 271034 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 169.77 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 12/16/2010 - 12116/2010 12114/201014:53:27 Page- . 8 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 342347 12/1612010 100797 HAWKINS INC. 2,654.25 TONKAZORB 00001216 251701 3179036 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING _ POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES 1180.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION 1180.6235 POSTAGE ELECTION 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 2,654.25 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 342348 12/16/2010 YORK SELLING 106436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 156.00 SILS /CAL SUPPORT 251827 20106211 -51 156.00 342349 12/1612010 101216 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFI 1,362.64 NOV 2010 BOOKING FEES 251828 3362 1,362.64 342350 12/1612010 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 165.03 COURIER / POSTAGE 251615 112910 259.69 COURIER / POSTAGE 251615 112910 424.72 342361 12/16/2010 106388 HLB TAUTGES REDPATH LTD. 2,305.00 AUDIT 00006176 251932 001105960 2,305.00 342362 12/16/2010 104376 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,214.50 251745 542405 417.50 251841 543125 99.00 251842 543288 482.50 251979 543009 570.00 251980 543073 2,783.50 342353 12/16/2010 126093 ILVONEN, ILONA 332.80 ART WORK SOLD 251910 121010 i ,1 332.80 342364 12/16/2010 101732 INDUSTRIAL DOOR CO. INC. 1,034.29 GARAGE DOOR REPAIRS 251616 D217764 -IN 1,034.29 342365 12/1612010 100829 JERRY S HARDWARE 7.40 251790 113010 11.96 251790 113010 16.64 251790 113010 21.77 251790 113010 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING _ POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES 1180.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION 1180.6235 POSTAGE ELECTION 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 1400.6230 1322.6406 5311.6406 5840.6406 1552.6406 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL POOL OPERATION LIQUOR YORK GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING R55CKREG .LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 23.93 33.64' 50.03 58.69 63.03 '66.06 i 68.61 73.48 83.48 111.79 128.83 174.46 209.64 380.12 439.23 479.87 2,502.66 342366 12/16/2010 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 70.00 4,847.63 60.30 4,147.50 135.00 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES _ GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL. SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 17,460.70 CITY t. _11NA YORK SELLING Council Check Register 100836 JOHNSON. BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 12116/2010 - 12/16/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 251790 113010 2210.6406 251790 113010 5210.6406 251790 113010 5431.6406 251790 113010 1553.6406 251790 113010 1400.6406 251790 113010 5620.6406 251790 113010 5630.6406 251790 113010 1470.6406 251790 113010 5621.6103 251790 113010 5511.6406 251790 113010 5913.6406. 251790 113010 5422.6406 251790 113010 4090.6406 251790 113010 1301.6406 251790 113010 1646.6406 251790 113010 421552.6710 5862.5513 251791 1458076 5421.5514 251843 1454868 5842.5514 251844 1454869 5842.5515 251981 1503851 5822.5514 251982 1503850 5862.5515 251983 1503852 5862.5514 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES _ GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL. SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 17,460.70 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 342358 12/16/2010 100836 JOHNSON. BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. COST OF'G60DS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 413.88 251845 1960395 5842.5512 2,572.47 251846 1960398 5842.5513 1,169.04 251847 1960400 5842.5513 22.11 251848 1960397 5842.5513 895.56 251849 1960396 5842.5513 3,277.86 251850 1960399 5842.5512 31.37 251851 1960402 5842.5515 2,509.86 251852 1960401 5842.5512 .300.36 251853 1960403 5862.5512 557.35 251854 1957189 5862.5513 1,389.48 251855 1960407 5862.5512 2,809.16 251856 1960409 5862.5512 4,728.63 251857 1960408 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1;, - J1014:53:27 Page- 9 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS GOLF DOME PROGRAM RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ' EDINBOROUGH PARK CENTENNIAL LAKES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE PW BUIL CENTRAL SERV EQUIPMENT GRILL YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING COST OF.GOODS "SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF'G60DS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COSTcOF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS'SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS'SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Business Unit CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING Council Check Register VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 12/16/2010 -12/16/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 1.12 251858 1960394 5862.5513 22.11 251859 1960405 5862.5513 1,719.87 251860 1960404 5862.5513 2,767.86 251861 1960406 5862.5513 44.16- 251862 479766 5842.5512 34.22- 251863 479448 5842.5513 10.00- 251864 478618 5862.5512 1,021.96 251984 1960779 5862.5512 112.12 251985 1960389 5822.5512 122.12 251986 1960392 5822.5512 514.46 251987 1960393 5822.5512 713.39 251988 1960390 5822.5513 1,475.93 251989 1960391 5822.5513 42.90- 251990 480139 5842.5512 42.80- 251990 480139 5862.5512 14.30- 251990 480139 5822.5512 18.72- 251991 480050 5822.5513 22.20- 251992 480049 5822.5513 9.00- 251993 479764 5822.5513 27.00- 251994 480048 5822.5513 12/14/201014:53:27 Page- 10 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 28,882.77 342359 12/16/2010 127772 JOHNSON PLUMBING AND HEATING 317.62 PLUMBING REPAIRS 251702 2276 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 317.62 342360 12/16/2010 102719 JOHNSON, PHILLIP 99.19 DVDS, BATTERIES 251933 111810 5125.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD MEDIA STUDIO 99.19 342361 12/16/2010 127499 JR BROADCASTING LLC 2,470.00 ADVERTISING 00009287 249402 4832 5125.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER MEDIA STUDIO 2,470.00 342362 12/16/2010 111018 KEEPRS INC. 224.76 UNIFORMS 00003841 251934 153537 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 227.96 UNIFORMS 00003779 251935 153320 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 183.97 UNIFORMS 00003841 251936 153537 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 636.69 342363 12/1612010 126929 LAKE IMPROVEMENT CONSULTING LL 443.75 POND TREATMENT 251937 1109 5422.6251 SHARED MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY t, —OINA 12r1 vi201014:53:27 Council Check Register Page - 11 12/16/2010 — 12116/2010 Check 0 Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 443.75 342364 12/16/2010 121656 LAVEN, JANE 73.45 ART WORK SOLD 251911 121010 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 73.45 342366 1211612010 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 473.10 TY -RAP, SEALANT, WHEELS 00005413 251703 9835763 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 182.32 HEX NUTS, CAPSCREWS 00001962 251704 9835764 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 655.42 342366 12/1612010 125298 LEARMAN, KRISTEN 67.60 ART WORK SOLD 251912 121010 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 67.60 342367 12/16/2010 100864 LEITNER COMPANY 583.39 SAND 251938 204804 5422.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 583.39 342368 12/1612010 124810 LIFT BRIDGE BEER COMPANY 130.00 251746 11274 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 130.00 251865 11334 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 78.00 251995 11332 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 338.00 342369 12/16/2010 101755 LITIN PAPER CO 718.90 BUCKETS 00006178 251939 359318 5210.6590 RANGE BALLS GOLF DOME PROGRAM 718.90 342370 12/16/2010 110888 LOPEZ, ELIZABETH 106.04 MEETING EXPENSES 251617 120710 1190.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ASSESSING 106.04 342371 12/16/2010 124435 LUNDA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 1,304.46 FINAL PAYMENT 251960 121710 14005.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS FO005 PROMENADE FIBER CONDUIT 1,956.36 FINAL PAYMENT 251960 121710 04363.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS -363 PROMENADE PHASE 2 3,635.51 FINAL PAYMENT 251960 121710 05469.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -469 NORTH PROMENADE 36,856.87 FINAL PAYMENT 251960 121710 07102.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS S102 PROMENADE IMP PHASE 1 38,738.28 FINAL PAYMENT 251960 121710 01364.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -364 PROMENADE PHASE 2 53,485.91 FINAL PAYMENT 251960 121710 10095.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BR5 PROMENADE BRIDGE Q YORK 135,977.39 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 12116/2010 —12116/2010 i Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 342372 1211612010 120343 M DESIGN INTERACTIVE INC. 658.75 BIRTHDAY PARTY RESERVATON SYST 251705 1000EOD 5620.6103 658.75 342373 12/16/2010 122036 M -K GRAPHICS 1,219.07 A/P CHECKS 251706 5696 1160.6160 1,219.07 342374 12116/2010 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 639.22 251747 99261 5822.5515 639.22 342375 1211612010 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIP INC. 61.05- CREDIT 00005198 251707 8097 1553.6530 25.01 CHUTE BASE SEALS 00005326 251708 2110230 1553.6530 178.52 MIRROR 00005380 251709 2110402 1553.6530 142.48 342376 12/16/2010 105677 MAGC 60.00 DUES - MOLLY ANDERSON 251829 2011 1400.6105 60.00 342377 12/1612010 127763 MARTECK 136.84 SERIAL LICENSES 251618 43658 1550.6406 136.84 342378 12/16/2010 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 3,325.00 LAKE ELMO INN TRIP 251792 120810 1628.6103.07 3,325.00 342379 12116/2010 106464 MEIXNER, DIANNE 52.00 ART WORK SOLD 251913 121010 5101.4413 52.00 342380 12116/2010 102281 MENARDS 190.05 PANIT FOR PROSHOP STORAGE 00006485 251940 27757 5440.6406 190.05 342381 12/16/2010 127808 MERCURY, ALEXANDRA 98.00 WINTER CLASS REFUND 251793 120810 5511.6136 98.00 WINTER CLASS REFUND 251793 120810 5511.6136 196.00 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DATA PROCESSING 12/14/201014:53:27 Page - 12 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK FINANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY t— _JINA Council Check Register 12/16/2010 — 12/16/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier /Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 342382 12/16/2010 102602 METRO CASH REGISTER SYSTEMS 93.29 RIBBON CARTRIDGES 00006173 251794 70234 5410.6513 93.29 342383 12/16/2010 102607 METRO.VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 82.50 OFFICIATING FEES 251619 3838 4077.6103 82:50 .OFFICIATING FEES 251941 3844 4077.6103 165.00 342384 12/16/2010 100895 MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORPOR 127.66 DRILL 00005379 251710 11732734 1553.6556 127.66 342386 12/16/2010 100913 MINNEAPOLIS ,& SUBURBAN SEWER & 2,205.00 INSTALL RODS AND STANDPIPES.: 00001087 251620 33749 5913.6180 2,205.00 342386 12116/2010 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 14,437.79 431 - 0005.300 251621 WATER PURCHASE 5913.6601 14,437.79 342387 12/16/2010 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 21.24 CO2 CYLINDER 251795 R111100118 5421.6406 21.24 342388 12116/2010 101684 MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLICE ASS 890.00 LEADERSHIP ACADEMY 251711 2815 1400.6104 890.00 342389 12/16/2010 101637 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AG 300.00 TRAINING FEES 00001856 251712 9900023761 1280.6104 300.00 342390 12/16/2010 .100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 35.27 PVC SUCTION. HOSE 00005377 251622 0086862 -IN 1553.6530 35.27 342391 12/16/2010 113819 MORRISON COUNTY 320.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 249011 110110 1000.2055 320.00 Subledger Account Description OFFICE SUPPLIES 1 G, -:: [01014:53:27 Page- 13 Business Unit GOLF ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION WATER PURCHASED DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET R55CKREG LOG20000 MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS REPAIR PARTS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE CITY OF EDINA DUES &SUBSCRIPTIONS PUBLIC HEALTH COST ORGOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING Council Check Register 1 COST OF GOODS -SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP OFFICE SUPPLIES 12/16/2010 - 12/16/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No .34230 12/16/2010 100906 MT] DISTRIBUTING INC. 236.42- BEARINGS, SHAFT 00006368 251942 767528 -00 -' 5422.6530 273.91 PINS, WASHERS 00006368 251943 767643 -00 5431.6530 510.33 342393 12/16/2010 101472 NEHA 95.00 MEMBERSHIP 2245 251796 120910 1490.6105 95.00 MEMBERSHIP 63738 251796 120910 1490.6105 190.00 342394 1211612010 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 73.50 251748 63271 5822.5513 280.50 251749 63171 5822:5513 569.00 251866 63272 5862.5513 402.00 251867 63269 5842.5513 1,325.00 342395 12/16/2010 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY CO. 123.66 OIL PAINT, CANVAS PANELS 00009298 251944 39860400 5120.5510 123.66 342396 12116/2010 103578 OFFICE DEPOT - 296.87 SHREDDER :` . - 00006034 251797 1283044604. 5410.6513 296.87 342397 12/16/2010 124089 OHMANN, NANCY 57.20 ART WORK SOLD 251914 121010 5101.4413 i 57.20 342398 12/16/2010 120856 OLSON, VICKI 7.00 MEETING EXPENSES 251826 120910 1160.6107 20.00 MEETING EXPENSES 251826 120910 - 1160.6106 27.00 342399 12/16/2010 101659 ORKIN PESTCONTROL 119.40 PEST CONTROL 251945 60807643 1551.6180 119.40 342400 1211612010 101470 ORVIS, JOAN 21,065.50 WINTER CLASS % 251946 121010 5510:6103 1 21,065.50 12/14/2 01014:53:27 Page- . 14 Subledger Account Description Business Unit REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS REPAIR PARTS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PUBLIC HEALTH DUES &SUBSCRIPTIONS PUBLIC HEALTH COST ORGOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS.SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS -SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION ART WORK SOLD MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE MEETING.EXPENSE CONTRACTED REPAIRS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER REVENUES FINANCE FINANCE CITY, HALL GENERAL ARENA ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CITY l.. _,uINA VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING Council Check Register YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 12/16/2010 - 12/16/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 342401 12/16/2010 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 229.66 COOKIES 251798 276145 5421.5510 229.66 342402 12/1612010 102440 PASS, GRACE 93.60 ART WORK SOLD 251915 121010 5101.4413 93.60 342403 12/1612010 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1,011.75 251750 8285362 -IN 5842.5513 290.72 251751 8285378 -IN 5822.5513 3,087.53 251868 8285382 -IN 5862.5513 4,390.00 342404 12/1612010 100946 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 642.02 251799 65202893 5210.5510 642.02 342405 12/16/2010 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 3,382.95 251869 2000377 5862.5513 950.15 251870 2000380 5862.5513 242.31 251871 2000379 5862.5512 114.24 251872 2000378 5862.5515 33.61 251873 2000376 5842.5515 2,670.31 251874 2000373 5842.5513 5,838.44 251875 2000375 5842.5513 322.24 251876 2000504 5842.5513 480.72 251877 2000374 5842.5512 19.50- 251878 3448653 5862.5512 1,165.27 251996 2000370 5822.5513 764.00 251998 2000372 5822.5513 161.12 251999 2000503 5822.5513 16,105.86 342406 12/16/2010 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 184.79 TIRES 00005419 251623 107939 1553.6583 184.79 342407 12/1612010 127773 PREMIER SPECIALTY VEHICLES INC 138,327.00 2010 AMBULANCE 00003750 251713 2527 421470.6710 138,327.00 12,...401014:53:27 Page - 15 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD GOLF DOME PROGRAM COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/14/201014:53:27 Council Check Register Page - 16 12/16/2010 - 12/16/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 342408 12/16/2010 100971 QUALITY WINE 2,440.82 251752 391938 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,278.20 251753 392064 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 344.00 251754 392152 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 641.61 251879 392151 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,297.67 251880 392063 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 729.21 251881 392150 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,417.55 251882 392062 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,414.95 251883 391937 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 397.80 251884 392750 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,911.08 252000 391940 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 16,872.89 342409 12/1612010 123898 QWEST 55.72 251624 112810 5911.6188 TELEPHONE WELL PUMPS 58.42 251624 112810 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 113.29 251624 112810 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 116.95 251624 112810 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 137.93 251624 112810 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 165.47 251624 112810 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 234.33 251624 112810 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 266.02 251624 112810 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 624.95 251624 112810 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 2,054.34 251624 112810 1550.6188 _ TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 606.52 612 E01 -0426 251800 0426 -12/10 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 606.52 612 Ell -6797 251801 6797 -12/10 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 290.66 612 E24 -8656 251802 8656 -12/10 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 517.51 612 E24 -8657 251803 8657 -12/10 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 18.33 651 281 -1355 8001311 251804 1355 -12/10 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 121.77 952 926 -0419 251805 0419 -12/10 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 57.60 952 926 -0092 251806 0092 -12/10 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 516.97 612 E01 -8392 251807 8392 -12110 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 6,563.30 342410 12/16/2010 117692 R & B CLEANING INC. 2,009.25 RAMP STAIRWELL CLEANING 00001169 251714 873 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 2,009.25 342411 12116/2010 100972 R &R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN 1 228.94 ZAMBONI PARTS 00008073 251625 0046433 -IN 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 228.94 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY G. _,INA Council Check Register 12/16/2010 - 12/16/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 342412 1211612010 126326 REACH LOCAL INC. 290.00 EDINA LIQUOR WEB AD 251947 677776 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 290.00 EDINA LIQUOR WEB AD 251947 677776 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 290.00 EDINA LIQUOR WEB AD 251947 677776 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 870.00 342413 12/1612010 124337 ROMEO, ANGELA 130.65 ART WORK SOLD 251916 121010 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 130.65 342414 12/16/2010 106171 ROSE, SARAH 53.30 ART WORK SOLD 251917 121010 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 53.30 342416 12/16/2010 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 113.07 CHANGE OUT PARTS WASHER 00005432 251961 923281951 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS 113.07 342416 1211612010 127387 SCHARF, CLARE 455.91 INSTRUCTION AC 250600 111910 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 455.91 342417 12/16/2010 101862 SEVEN CORNERS HARDWARE INC. 648.56 CORDLESS KIT, HOSE REEL 00001166 251626 152683 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 648.56 342418 12/16/2010 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 4.80 TASTE OF CREATIVITY 251918 121010 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 119.60 ART WORK SOLD 251918 121010 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 124.40 342419 12/16/2010 126096 SIERRA METALS INC. 6,601.30 FINAL PAYMENT 251948 123010 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 6,601.30 342420 12/16/2010 101000 SIR SPEEDY 42.75 BUSINESS CARDS 251627 67019 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 176.61 BUSINESS CARDS 251628 67020 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 219.36 342421 12/1612010 124861 SMITH, BRAD 1Z. _j1014:53:27 Page - 17 Business Unit JU 1 tl J 1 JCLLIIV V YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION STREET RENOVATION ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES PW BUILDING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 98.00 WINTER CLASS REFUND 251808 120810 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 12/16/2010 - 12/16/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 98.00 342422 12/16/2010 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC. 45.87 THERM KIT 00005382 251715 S182803 1553.6530 1,957.38 HEAD GASKET REPAIR 00006370 251949 SW54501 5422.6180 2,003.25 342423 1211612010 100660 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC 59.09 KEYS 00006484 251950 CH- 546963 5422.6406 59.09 342424 12/16/2010 127807 STEPHENS, STEPHANIE 61.83 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 251809 7204 W SHORE DR 5900.2015 61.83 342426 12/1612010 124476 STEVENS ENGINEERS INC. 2,840.12 CONSULTING SERVICES 251629 8405 5500.1705 2,840.12 342426 1211612010 101766 STROH, STEVE 29.50 UNIFORM PURCHASE 251716 120510 1400.6203 29.50 342427 12116/2010 127809 STURGESS, STACY 104.00 WINTER CLASS REFUND 251810 120810 5511.6136 104.00 342428 12/16/2010 113841 SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION CO. 40.00 PERMIT REFUND 251811 ED102601 1470.4161 40.00 342429 1211612010 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 42.90 PUBLISH PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE00014798 251630 1287296 1120.6120 314.33 EDINA LIQUOR AD 00016102 251631 1289978 5822.6122 314.33 EDINA LIQUOR AD 00016102 251631 1289978 5842.6122 314.34 EDINA LIQUOR AD 00016102 251631 1289978 5862.6122 25.03 PUBLISH AERATION NOTICE 00014798 251717 1288512 1120.6120 25.03 PUBLISH AERATION NOTICE 00014798 251718 1288511 1120.6120 160.88 PUBLISH PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE00014798 251719 1289928 1120.6120 1,196.84 342430 12/1612010 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 12/141201014:53:27 Page- 18 Subledger Account Description Business Unit REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS SPRINKLER PERMITS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY %- �OINA 1i,,,,201014:53:27 Council Check Register Page - 19 12/16/2010 - 12116/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,372.00 251755 Z02113 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 505.00 252001 MVP00058 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING CUSTOMER REFUND TELEPHONE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WELDING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BALANCE SHEET ENGINEERING GENERAL PLANNING GRILL GRILL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES TRAFFIC SIGNALS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,877.00 342431 12/1612010 127811 SWENSON, AMY 50.59 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 251821 3805 54TH ST 5900.2015 50.59 342432 12116/2010 120696 T- MOBILE 84.88 SURVEY PHONE 251962 477067848 -11/10 1260.6188 84.88 342433 12/16/2010 120602 TEAGUE, CARY 99.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 251632 120710 1140.6107 99.00 342434 12/16/2010 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 226.00 251756 00773356 5421.5514 316.00- 251757 00773284 5421.5514 45.60 251758 618508 5862.5515 1,687.60 251759 618509 5862.5514 3,452.40 252002 619388 5862.5514 50.00 252003 619369 5862.5515 5,145.60 342436 12/16/2010 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 262.50 DRAFT COUNCIL MINUTES 11/16/10 251822 M18096 1120.6103 262.50 342436 12/16/2010 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 9.87 WELDING GAS 00005426 251720 413101 1553.6580 39.48 WELDING TANKS 251951 413102 5630.6406 49.35 342437 12/16/2010 103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 4,935.01 AUTOSCOPE SENSOR 00001068 251721 0000046264 1330.6215 4,935.01 ,342438 12/16/2010 104064 TRANS UNION LLC 99.20 BACKGROUND CHECKS 251722 11022547 1400.6103 99.20 CUSTOMER REFUND TELEPHONE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WELDING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES UTILITY BALANCE SHEET ENGINEERING GENERAL PLANNING GRILL GRILL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES TRAFFIC SIGNALS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 12/16/2010 -12116/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 342439 1211612010 101172 TWIN CITY SAW CO. 204.07 POLE SAW 00006366 251952 A17495 5422.6556 204.07 342440 12116/2010 100363 U.S. BANK 1 32.02 FREIGHT CHARGE 251953 121010 1470.6103 43.10 FUEL 251953 121010 1470.6107 81.03 BOOK 251953 121010 1470.6405 102.77 GATED WYE PARTS 251953 121010 1470.6530 820.68 TUITION / SEMINAR 251953 121010 1470.6104 910.89 FIRE HOUSE SUPPLIES 251953 121010 1470.6406 1,990.49 342441 12/16/2010 116379 U.S. BANK 17.90 NET ZERO 251954 120310 1500.6103 38.20 INTERNET 251954 120310 1550.6155 56.10 342442 12/16/2010 101061 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 1,605.15 UNIFORMS 251633 113010 1419.6203 i 2,970.46 UNIFORMS 251633 113010 1400.6203 4,575.61 342443 12/16/2010 102692 UNITED HEALTH CARE INS CO 1,056.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 251812 TOBIN, BETTY 1470.4329 1,056.00 342444 12/16/2010 101056 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 360.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 251723 120610 1470.6104 360.00 342446 12/16/2010 101908 US FOODSERVICE INC 3,775.60 GAS'GRILL 00006346 251813 5578547 5421.6406 3,775.60 342446 12/1612010 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 5,885.00 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00001096 251823 16060 5913.6180 5,885.00 342447 12/16/2010 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 386.86 LIQUOR BAGS, ROLL TOWEL 00007512 251955 181574 -00 5842.6512 386.86 12/14/201014:53:27 Page- 20 Subledger Account Description Business Unit TOOLS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE BOOKS & PAMPHLETS REPAIR PARTS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GENERALSUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES BANK SERVICES CHARGES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL UNIFORM ALLOWANCE RESERVE PROGRAM UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING R55CKREG iJG20000 CITY c< _JINA 1 - . ._01014[53:27 Council Check Register Page - 21 12/16/2010 -12/16/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 342448 12/1612010 127812 VISCHER, MAUREEN 208.00 WINTER CLASS REFUND 251825 121010 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS I 208.00 342449 12/16/2010 121042 WALLACE CARLSON PRINTING 1,820.08 WINTER SCHEDULE 00009295 251956 38985 5110.6575 PRINTING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION •I - 1,820.08 342460 12/1612010 127819 WEATHERAMA WEATHER. INSTRUMENTS . 4,546.05 WEATHER STATION 00001946 251957 011120 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT 4,546.05 342461 12/16/2010 119436 WELLS FARGO - 12.10 _REF #1284696- 102425 251814 112910 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 12.10 342452 12/16120.10 127339 WELNA 11 HARDWARE 12.38 PAINT 00009286 251634 213606 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLD61MAINT 12.38 342463 12/16/2010 127768 VAG LEY AND ASSOCIATES 356.25 CONSULTING SERVICES 251635 184609 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 356.25 342464 12/16/2010 101973 WILMOT, SOLVEI - 13.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 251636 OCT2010 5952.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE RECYCLING 124.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 251636 OCT2010 1490.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC HEALTH 21.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 251637 NOV2010 5952.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE RECYCLING - 113.00. MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 251637 NOV2010 1490.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC HEALTH 272:00 342466 12/16/2010 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 234.20 251760 257852 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,194.15 251885 257851 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 749.55 251886 257722 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,177.90 342466 12/16/2010 101312 ' WINE MERCHANTS 1.12 251887 343419 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORKSELLING 2,657.02 251888 343420 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING . 600.48 251889 343421 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG L0620000 Check # Date Amount Supplier /Explanation 42.47- 1, 364.71 4,580.86 i 342457 12116/2010 127806 WINGROVE, DENNIS 2,557.82 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 2,557.82' i CITY OF EDINA ' Council Check Register 12/16/2010 - 12/16/2010 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 251890 51291 5842.5513 252004 343418 5822.5513 251815 120810 1470.4329 ..342459 12116/2010 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 16.59 251761 488798 2,345.59 251762 498193 127.90 251763 498202 6,328.98 251764 498201 34.53 251765 498197 37.05 251766 498199 1,891.71 251767 498198 1,151.53 251768 498196 1,239.00 251769 497229 982.60 251770 496901 108.67 251771 494793 6,838.26 251771 494793 153.62 251772 494791 3.45- 251773 813370 179.71= 251774 816965 2,947.80 251891 496902 8,444.09 251892 498200 11,973.66 251893 498194 110.15 251894 498195 174.15- 251895 817553 235.30- 251896 817551 30.00- 251897 817218 1,210.70 252005 499850 3,026.75 252006 499851 1,485.22 252007 499956 172.95 252008 499953 50,004.74 3424611 12/16/2010 124629 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 168.00 251775 688800 2,303.50 251776 688682 1,529.75 251777 688184 64.50 251778 687927 5842.5512 5862.5512 5842.5515 5842.5513 5822.5515 5822.5515 5822.5513 5822.5512 5842.5513 5862.5512 5822.5515 5822.5512 5862.5515 5842.5512 5862.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5862.5513 5862.5515 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5512 5822.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5862.5512 12114/201014:53:27 Page- 22 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD, LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST.OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF. GOODS SOLD WINE . COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COSTbF GOODS SOLD WINE ` COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE - COST OF GOODS SOLD VNNE COST OF GOODSSOLD LIQUOR YORK-SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODSSOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY t- -ANA 12i ..,c01014:53:27 Council Check Register Page - 23 12/16/2010 - 12/16/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,827.82 251779 687926 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 24.00 251780 650055 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 152.00- 251781 000202 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,068.60 251898 690521 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,159.85 252009 690354 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 11, 994.02 342461 1211612010 127774 WORLDWIDE CELLARS INC. 787.00 251899 10 -25169 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 787.00 342462 12/1612010 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 96.00 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REVIEW 251963 34 -01686 -020 1265.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 5,985.00 70TH ST CONSTR SERVICES 251964 1 -01686 -180 01367.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT 13,053.50 44TH ST IMPROVEMENTS 251965 2 -01686 -170 01383.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -383 W44TH ST 19,134.50 342463 12116/2010 101726 XCEL ENERGY 851.48 51- 6979948 -4 251638 262591168 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1,169.85 51- 6979948 -4 251638 262591168 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,280.56 51- 6979948 -4 251638 262591168 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK OCCUPANCY 378.85 51- 6137136 -8 251639 262575975 5430.6185 LIGHT & POWER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 40.37 51- 7567037 -0 251640 262597288 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 21.22 51- 4151897 -6 251641 262553040 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,198.79 51- 5634814 -2 251.642 262570611 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 3,055.11 51- 6621207 -1 251643 262591765 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 4,582.29 51- 4966303 -6 251644 262411277 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 3,223.22 51- 6840050 -6 251824 263088917 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 4,636.46 51- 6824328 -7 251958 263276583 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER CLUB HOUSE 20,438.20 342464 12116/2010 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 35.08 NOV USAGE - BLDG /ENG 00004322 251645 051811657 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 168.90 NOV USAGE - PARK & REC 00004322 251646 051811658 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 116.84 NOV USAGE 251959 051811759 5110.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 320.82 342465 1211612010 118028 YAHOOI CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS 20.44 REF #162221 251816 162221 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 20.44 342466 12116/2010 120099 Z WINES USA LLC R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/14/201014:53:27 Council Check Register Page - 24 12/16/2010 —12/16/2010 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1 654.00 251900 9973 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD \MNE VERNON SELLING 654.00 929,740.25 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 929,740.25 Total Payments 929,740.25 R55CKSUM �z:.i20000 Company 01000 GENERAL FUND 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND r 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 05100 ART CENTER FUND 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 05800 LIQUOR FUND 05900 UTILITY FUND 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 05950 RECYCLING FUND 09900 PAYROLL FUND Report Totals Amount 63,051.62 467.27 158,711.40 344,954.62 6,687.40 1,394.56 11.96 21,051.82 26,481.28 916.38 200,803.84 60,185.99 4,104.16 929,740.25 CITY U. _jINA Council Check Summary 12/16/2010- 12/16/2010 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, thafthese claims comply:in all`material=respects with, the requirements of the'City. .. of Edina purchasing' policigs and procedures date 12 ... �J 1 QI4:54:04 Page- 1 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 10/26/10-11/26/10 Card Holder Jlerchani Account Name Trans Date Amount Purchase Discription Merchant Name Merchant City State Code JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/10/25 $282.77 HALLOWEEN SUPPLIES TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5621.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/10/27 ($494.00) REGISTRATION REFUND NRPA 703 - 8582165 VA 1600.6104 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/10/28 $98.67 CALENDARS CALENDARS 800 - 365 -9327 VA 5440.646 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/11/01 $360.44 DEHUMIDIFIER THE HOME DEPOT 2806 ST.LOUIS PARK MN 5440.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/11/04 $166.24 ADAPTIVE REC PROGRAM BRUNSWICK ZONE EDEN PF EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1629.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010111/09 $100.00 POSTAGE PITNEYBOWES- POSTAGE 800 -468 -8454 CT 5621.6235 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/11/15 $599.27 ICE SKATING TRAINERS STO -COTE PRODUCT /NICEF 262- 877 -3660 WI 5630.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/11/22 $35.00 ANNUAL MEETING MN RECREATION AND PARR 763- 571 -1305 MN 1600.6104 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/11/22 $159.20 ADAPTIVE REC PROGRAM STAGES THEATRE COMPAN HOPKINS MN 1629.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/11/23 $35.61 EQUIPMENT RENTAL PITNEY BOWES* 800 - 228 -1071 CT 5421.6510 JEFF LONG 2010/11/04 $499.90 COMPUTER PRINTER B & H PHOTO- VIDEO.COM 800 - 9479950 NY 1400.6160 JEFF LONG 2010/11/10 $112.48 USB FLASH DRIVE MICRO CENTER BETHEL RC 614-326-8500 OH 1400.6160 JEFF LONG 2010/11/12 $173.24 TOOL CABINET SEARS COM INTERNET 800 - 676 -5543 IA 1400.6406 JEFF LONG 2010/11/15 $20.00 DATA PRIVACY TRAINING PAYPAL *NAMIMINNESO 402 - 935 -7733 CA 1400.6104 JEFF LONG 2010/11/16 $44.99 USB ADAPTER J &R SOUND /MAILORDER 800 -426 -6027 NY 1400.6160 JEFF LONG 2010/11/23 $10.00 APPLIANCE RECYCLING APPLIANCE DEPOT INVER GROVE I MN 1400.6406 JEFF LONG 2010/11/24 $45.57 LASER POINTER AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM /BILI WA 1400.6160 DEB MANGEN 2010110/25 $539.00 CANOPY RENTAL ELECTIONS ULTIMATE EVENTS 952 - 3460102 MN 1180.6403 DEB MANGEN 2010/10/25 $540.17 CANOPY RENTAL ELECTIONS ULTIMATE EVENTS 952 - 3460102 MN 1180.6103 DEB MANGEN 2010/11/16 $9.64 CLEANING SUPPLIES TARGET 00002600 ST. LOUIS PAR MN 1120.6406 JOHN WALLIN 2010/10/26 $84.00 PROPS FOR COMMERCIAL PROM SHOP SOUTHDALE EDINA MN 2210.6406 JOHN WALLIN 2010/10/28 $50.50 ASME BUILDING PUBLICATION ASME 973 - 882 -1170 NJ 1495.6405 JOHN WALLIN 2010/11/01 $152.71 COUNCIL WORKSHOP D BRIAN'S DELI - #6 MINNEAPOLIS MN 1100.6106 JOHN WALLIN 2010/11/04 $300.37 RETIREMENT WATCH MACY *S EAST #231 EDINA MN 1513.6103 JOHN WALLIN 2010/11/06 ($75.04) PURCHASE RETURN HP SERVICES 800 - 325 -5372 CA 1554.6710 JOHN WALLIN 2010/11/09 $38.11 CABLE FOR PUBLIC WORKS MONOPRICE COM 909 - 989 -6887 CA 5913.6406 JOHN WALLIN 2010/11/10 $100.00 ADVERTISING SERVICES AOL *PATCH MEDIA CORP 866 -485 -9217 VA 2210.646 JOHN WALLIN 2010/11/10 $125.00 ADVERTISING SERVICES AOL *PATCH MEDIA CORP 866 -485 -9217 VA 5210.6122 JOHN WALLIN 2010/11/16 $152.71 COUNCIL WORKSHOP D BRIAN'S DELI -#6 MINNEAPOLIS MN 1100.6106 JOHN WALLIN 2010/11/22 $50.50 ASME BUILDING PUBLICATION ASME 973- 882 -1170 NJ 1495.6405 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 10/26/10- 11/26/10 Card Holder Aerchani Account Name Trans Date Amount Purchase Discription Merchant Name Merchant City State Code JOHN WALLIN 2010/11/24 $74.94 FLOWERS TLF *A PRECIOUS PETALS 800 - 4212815 MN 1120:6406 $4,391.99 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies,and procedures date 1NA, oe \N�RPORP� Bee REPORPRECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VII. A. DEBRA MANGEN Action From: CITY CLERK F] Discussion z Information Date: DECEMBER 21, 2010 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received since the last Council meeting. Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and John Keprios. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 lbiunno@ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing "Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Katherine Stelberg Bass [mailto:kmsb @earthlink.net] Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 3:56 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Thank you for your vote on the creek -based route!! Dear Mayor Hovland and all council members, I want to thank you for your Dec. 7 vote on advancing the creek -based route of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. Based on the comments from Three Rivers Park District and all of the many supporters, I feel confident that a route can be identified that helps to alleviate some of the concerns of the.homeowners. I think you can be confident that your decision has the support of a majority of Edina residents. I know of many residents who support your decision and were not able to be at the city council hearing.on Dec. 7. I believe you made the right decision for a strong, vibrant and healthy Edina! Thank you!! Katherine Bass 6917 Gleason Road 1 r i . Susan.Howl From: Lynette Biunno . Sent: Monday, December 13, 20.10 4:00 PM To: John Keprios Cc: Susan Howl`"" Subject: FW: Thank you for your vote on the creek -based route!! Dc rc i 6 �r iJ Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and John Keprios. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 lbiunno@ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing "Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Katherine Stelberg Bass [mailto:kmsb @earthlink.net] Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 3:56 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Thank you for your vote on the creek -based route!! Dear Mayor Hovland and all council members, I want to thank you for your Dec. 7 vote on advancing the creek -based route of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. Based on the comments from Three Rivers Park District and all of the many supporters, I feel confident that a route can be identified that helps to alleviate some of the concerns of the.homeowners. I think you can be confident that your decision has the support of a majority of Edina residents. I know of many residents who support your decision and were not able to be at the city council hearing.on Dec. 7. I believe you made the right decision for a strong, vibrant and healthy Edina! Thank you!! Katherine Bass 6917 Gleason Road 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 2:39 PM To: John KepriosF, Cc: Susan Howl ;z Subject: FW: Creekside Regional Trail CC 1 6�j� Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and John Keprios. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist e �. 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 IbiunnoCcDci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Michael Lilja [mailto:mhl @lilja.com] Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 1:52 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Creekside Regional Trail Please forward to: Mayor, City Council & Park Director Dear Mayor and Council members, I am delighted you have approved the creekside route for the Edina segment of the regional trail system. I attended many meetings this year and have observed your careful and comprehensive deliberative process. I am aware that many of you visited various homes along the creekside route to consider resident concerns and also took the time to listen along the luce line trail boardwalks to ascertain noise levels. I appreciate the time you have committed and the patience you have displayed. Your leadership is commendable and will help to preserve a strong Edina community for generations to come. Thank you very much! Best regards Michael Lilja 5809 McGuire Road Edina, MN 55439 mliliancomcast.net Cell 612- 709 -3359 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 9:15 AM To: John Keprios Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FK Thank You: Nine Mile Creek Decision Hello there, DEC 16 2010 This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and John Keprios. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 lbiunnooci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Andrew Heyer [mailto:andrew @heyer.us] Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 7:19 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Thank You: Nine Mile Creek Decision Sorry, my previous email had an unintended question mark in the subject line. Resending my email. Please forward to: Mayor, City Council, and Parks Director Mayor and Council members, Thank you for your careful evaluation of the alternatives, critical analysis of the facts, tracking of issues and concerns, and vote for the creek -based route of the Nine Mile Creek trail. I believe that your decision is sound and it will result in an asset that is worth the economic and other costs. We will have a vibrant and attractive community that welcomes a varied demographic, where young families look first for a home. I moved to Edina because it is the best community in Minneapolis. I am glad we are building a premiere recreational system that will be used for generations to come. Thank you, Andrew Heyer 5717 Deville Or 612.208.9077 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 9:10 AM _- To: John Keprios Cc: Susan Howl ��, Subject: FW: Thank You ? Nine Mile Creek Decision R��� °'° DEC 16 2010 Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and John Keprios. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 lbiunno0ci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Andrew Heyer [mailto:andrew @heyer.us] Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 7:09 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Thank You ? Nine Mile Creek Decision Please forward to: Mayor, City Council, and Parks Director Mayor and Council members, Thank you for your careful evaluation of the alternatives, critical analysis of the facts, tracking of issues and concerns, and vote for the creek -based route of the Nine Mile Creek trail. I believe that your decision is sound and it will result in an asset that is worth the economic and other costs. We will have a vibrant and attractive community that welcomes a varied demographic, where young families look first for a home. I moved to Edina because it is the best community in Minneapolis. I am glad we are building a premiere recreational system that will be used for generations to come. Thank you, Andrew Heyer 5717 Deville Dr 612.208.9077 1 U Susan:Nowl From: -Julie Risser [ma iltoJ u lie. risser@visi.com] Sent: Monday, December 06, 20102:55 PM `" " To: Lynette Biunno � Subject: resignation 4'G Q lei December 6, 2010 Dear Mayor Hovland, Council Members Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Chair Fischer, Chair Latham, and City Clerk Mangen, I have enjoyed serving my community as a dual commissioner for the Energy and Environment Commission as well as the Planning Commission. While I would like to continue to serve on both commissions, additional responsibilities at work are making it difficult for me to do this well. In addition to directing the American Museum of Asmat Art at the University of St. Thomas, I am now the. chair of the Sacred Arts'Festival for St. Thomas. This on top of making preparations for the Asmat gallery that will be located in the new student center is keeping me quite busy.. While I cannot competently serve on both commissions, I would like to serve on one. Therefore I am officially resigning as a dual commissioner and submitting my name for consideration as a commissioner for Energy and Environment. I would like to continue to serve on this commission - energy and environmental issues are my passion. Furthermore, there is need for an individual to step up and lead efforts to improve air quality. I believe, my experiences as a commissioner as well as my experience as an advocate for MERP (Metro Emissions Reductions Project) would help me function well in this role. I have participated in environmental advocacy long enough to know the passion individuals can bring as well as the frustration they may have, with `process - I understand the very real need to channel energy from individuals into productive action. Thank you for all of your support and for considering working with me as I attempt this transition. Julie Risser 952- 927 -7538 (home) 651 - 962 -5512 (work) i Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 8:31 AM To: John Keprios Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: SUPPORTING ON CREEK LOCATION OF NINE MILE REGIONAL TRAIL - Hello there, �t� % VU This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and John Keprios. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist i e ". 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 `.5�� . �y; Ibiunno(cDci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Dick Ward [mailto:dickward1 @comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 4:30 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: SUPPORTING ON CREEK LOCATION OF NINE MILE REGIONAL TRAIL Edina City Council members I know you are holding a public hearing and considering the approval of the nine mile creek regional trail in Edina. As a citizen and resident in close proximity to the proposed trail location, please know that we, my wife Susan and I, are in favor of the on -creek location. This project has received a great deal of attention and some criticism, as have other projects contemplated in Edina and the greater Minneapolis /St. Paul area. Like the recently opened Target Field and the recently completed Westin at Galleria in Edina, when these projects are open and utilized, NO ONE complains that they are inappropriate, rather the opposite; they are greatly needed and well received. The trail project is well conceived, appropriate and will be utilitzed by many Edina and other community members. I would like to replace the Save Nine Mile Creek signs in my neighborhood with CREEK ACCESS FOR ALL signs. Please know that this project is supported by us and many other in Edina and will be used. Thank you in advance for your positive support of the proposed Creek Trail project. Dick and Sue Ward 952- 942 -5523 home Susan Howl From: Reid Kilberg [ mailto :RKilberg @mfcglobalus.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 4:23 PMT'- To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Please vote no - Nine mile regional trail DEC 0 = f j Mr. Hovland and council members, I am writing to urge you to vote no on the issue of the nine mile creek regional trail. I was a member of the Community Assessment Team(CAT) for the trail, and feel as though there are several issues regarding the trail which merit your no vote. 1. Cost - The cost of the new trail is excessive. I know that the city of Edina is not directly paying for the trail, but the taxpayers of the city of Edina will be. The Three Rivers Park District is currently not in good financial shape, in fact, they have been freezing the salaries of their employees and raising usage fees. The council should have some guarantees about upkeep and maintenance of the trail. Also, in our CAT meeting with the Watershed district, they said that they could not rule out a tax increase do to the reconstruction of the trail that is part of the product. 2. Public Safety - Not only on the trail, and bringing more people in very close proximity to homes and yards, but the additional toll the trail could take on the city of Edina Police Department. Has the Chief of Police been asked about this issue? The CAT team wanted him to address us, and the park district declined. 3. Traffic Issues - parts of the trail will have a major impact on traffic patterns in already congested areas. One such area is the intersection of Gleason Rd and Vernon Ave. The CAT team asked for an assessment of the impact that a trail crossing at this intersection with have, and none was done. Lastly, if the city council dose decide to approve the trail, I would hope that you do so with several requirements. I would hope that you address the privacy issues with the park district regarding fencing, screening, and replanting of lost landscaping and mature trees. Again, I urge you to vote no on this issue Thank you, Reid A. Kilberg 6012 Killarney Lane Edina, MN Phone: 952 - 746 -2444 Cell: 612 - 804 -5338 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 4:25 PM To: John Keprios Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail —IN FAVOR OF ON THE CREEK TRAIL `J6� DEC U 7010 This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and John Keprios Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 6 , 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 IbiunnoCDci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ' ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Dick Ward [mailto:dickwardl @comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 4:24 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail - -IN FAVOR OF ON THE CREEK TRAIL Edina City Council members I know you are holding a public hearing and considering the approval of the nine mile creek regional trail in Edina. As a citizen and resident in close proximity to the proposed trail location, please know the we, my wife Susan and myself, are in favor of the on -creek location. This project has received a great deal of attention and some criticism, as have other projects contemplated in Edina and the greater Minneapolis/ Dick and Sue Ward 952- 942 -5523 home Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 10:23 AM To: Scott Neal Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Soap 4 Hope Project RECrEMED Hello there, DEC 7010 This message has been forwarded to Mayor Hovland and Scott Neal. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 jc:• IbiunnoCcDci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com " ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: daniel and cheryl dulas [mailto:dulas001 @msn.com] Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 10:16 AM To: James Hovland; Lynette Biunno Cc: Mike Seaman Subject: Soap 4 Hope Project Dear Mayor Hovland and City Manager Neal, Students at Highlands Elementary School in Mike Seaman's and Holly Grimm's class are helping to make a difference. They are collecting soap to help the people of Haiti reduce the spread of cholera there. Because of the recent earthquake, people in Haiti may not be able to something as simple as wash their hands with soap before eating or after going to the bathroom. One student came up with a name for our project: "SOAP 4 HOPE." Can we get permission to put a soap collection box at City Hall or in the Police Station? Collection will take place until Friday morning, Dec. 17. The soap can be unused from hotels /motels or from the store, or used pieces that will be cleaned and melted down to make new bars. Here's the link to an article on the KSTP website posted : http://edina.kstp.com/ content /update - edina- kids - collect -soap- haiti Let me know and we will drop off a collection box. Hope to hear from you as soon as possible! Thanks! Happy Holidays! Cheryl Dulas and the students in Mike Seaman's and Holly Grimm's class Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 8:22 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Student visits RECEIVED DEC 2010 ,, Lynette Biunno, Receptionist e 952-927-88811 Fax 952- 826 -0389 f Ibiunnoaci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business 1, From: Anderson, Erik [ mailto :EriAnderson @edina.kl2.mn.us] Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 8:18 AM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: Dockter, Jason Subject: Student visits Mayor Hovland and Council: We thank you for your flexibility in accommodating student visitors at the December 7th Edina City Council meeting. The Valley View Middle School 9th grade U.S. Government teachers require students to visit a public meeting during second quarter to observe how people influence public policy. In the past, this activity has proven to be a very meaningful hands - on learning experience for our students. Thank you for your help in providing this opportunity. We would like you to be aware that there will be students present at the next three Council meetings. Students are required to observe and take field notes for at least an hour. One of the U.S. Government teachers will also be present at the meetings to help with organization. If you have any questions regarding this visit, please contact Erik or Jason. Sincerely, Erik Anderson 848 -3337 Jason Dockter 848 -3381 U.S. Government Teachers Valley View Middle School Susan Howl From: Colby Wilkins [mailto:cwilkins @resmith.com] Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 5:08 PM R E C E i Z To: Lynette Biunno Cc: joshs @cbburnet.com; kmschoolmail @aol.com DEC 16 2010 Subject: The Data that shows Edina Police do not deserve a raise Dear City Council, The attached data shows Edina Police do not deserve a raise. Yes they deserve to be paid appropriately however the public versus the private sector gap shows that no one is managing the public sector. The gap is even wider than what is attached and has been going on for a long time I have not had time to prepare something more complete however by looking at the attachment and the links I think you will see the reality. If the arbitrator is a public sector employee him /herself then there is a conflict as this is then just bumping one member of the family so another member will get his /hers later. Also in terms of dangerous jobs policeman ranks at number eleven. I'll send you the list. (Short on time right now, have to leave for a meeting) Most of the top end occupations do not get a handsome pension and also they make less than a cop. It's not right. Two of my high school friends are cops. They took early retirement about five years ago because the benefit was so rich. They could not say no! The City Manager, Scott H. Neal, should be standing up and saying no. His job is to manage, it's not to be a compliance officer. Colby H. Wilkins Thank you, ColbyH Wilkins Controller, RC Smith CompanyPhone 952 - 259 -1005 Email cwilkins at7.resmith.com Fax 952-854- 81601' 1 Benefits widen public, private workers' pay gap Updated 4/10/2009 223 AM I Comments 223 1 Recommend 27 ^� E. Share Yahoo! Buzz Add to Mixx. Facebook Twitter WA= o Fark o Digg o Reddit o MySpace o StumbleUpon o Propeller 0 Linkedln Subscribe myYahoo iGoogle • More 0 Netvibes o myAOL By Dennis Cauchon, USA TODAY The pay gap between government workers and lower- compensated private employees is growing as public employees enjoy sizable economy, federal figures show. Public employees earned benefits worth an average of $13.38 an hour in December 2008, the latest available data, the Bureau of La workers got $7.98 an hour. Overall, total compensation for state and local workers was $39.25 an hour — $11.90 more than in private business. In 2007, the gaf The gap has been expanding because of the increasing value of public employee benefits. Last year, government benefits rose three up 69 cents an hour for civil servants, 23 cents for private workers. Labor costs account for about half of state and local spending, according to BLS and Census data. Benefits consume a growing shar Illinois state Sen. Chris Lauzen, a Republican, says government benefits are unsustainable and unfair to taxpayers who earn less tha and angrier when they learn the difference between their pay and benefits and what we give to public employees," he says. Jennifer Porcari of the American Federation of Teachers, a union representing 1.4 million educators and state employees, says BLS earn higher wages are misleading because jobs aren't comparable. Government jobs, such as teaching, often require more educatooi Some states are asking unions for help with budget problems. New Mexico employees will pay an extra 1.5% of salary toward pensic Ohio's unions will take unpaid furlough days to save the state $440 million over two years. In the third year, workers will get most of tl The wage gap between government and private workers has stayed roughly the same since 2002. Benefits are a different story. For every $1 -an -hour pay increase, public employees have gotten $1.17 in new benefits. Private workers have gotten just 58 cents ir. Companies have ended most traditional pension plans and increased workers' share of health care costs. Government paid an avera medical insurance. Private companies paid $4,100. A full -time government worker receives benefits worth an average of $27,830 per year. A private worker's benefits are worth $16,598 Federal pay ahead of private industry By Melissa Golden, Getty Images Federal pay has become a hot political issue in recent months because of concerns over the federal budget deficit and recession - battered wages in the private sector. mal C) Fark 0 Digg 0 Reedit 0 MySpace 0 Stumbleupon 0 Propeller 0 Linkedtn E PAYCHECK The typical federal worker is paid 20% more than a private - sector worker in the same occupation. Median annual salary: Federal Private Difference $66,591 $55,500 $11,091 Sources: Bureau of Labor statistics, USA TODAY analysis Share Yahoo! Buzz Add to Mixx Facebook Twitter mal C) Fark 0 Digg 0 Reedit 0 MySpace 0 Stumbleupon 0 Propeller 0 Linkedtn E By Dennis Cauchon, USA TODAY Federal employees earn higher average salaries than private- sector workers in more than eight out of 10 occupations, a USA TODA` Accountants, nurses, chemists, surveyors, cooks, clerks and janitors are among the wide range of jobs that get paid more on averag( private sector. Overall, federal workers earned an average salary of $67,691 in 2008 for occupations that exist both in government and the private s Statistics data. The average pay for the same mix of jobs in the private sector was $60,046 in 2008, the most recent data available. CHART: Federal salaries compared to private- sector These salary figures do not include the value of health, pension and other benefits, which averaged $40,785 per federal employee in according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Federal pay has become a hot political issue in recent months because of concerns over the federal budget deficit and recession -bat Sen. Scott Brown, R- Mass., made federal pay an issue in his successful campaign to fill Edward Kennedy's seat and is fighting for a The federal government spent about $224 billion in 2008 on compensation for about 2 million civilian employees. "The data flip the conventional wisdom on its head," says Cato Institute budget analyst Chris Edwards, a critic of federal pay policy. "I than private workers, not less, in addition to having a large advantage in benefits." But National Treasury Employees Union President Colleen Kelley says the comparison is faulty because it "compares apples and orz, perform work that has more complexity and requires more skill than accounting work in the private sector, she says. "When you look at the actual duties, you see that very few federal jobs align with those in the private sector," she says. She says fed less than non - federal workers doing comparable work. Office of Personnel Management spokeswoman Sedelta Verble, says higher pay also reflects the longevity and older age of federal v USA TODAY used Bureau of Labor Statistics data to compare salaries in every federal job that had a private- sector equivalent. For e registered nurses — working for the Veterans Administration and elsewhere — were paid an average of $74,460 a year, $10,680 mo nurses. The BLS reports that 216 occupations covering 1.1 million federal workers exist in both the federal government and the private sector covering 750,000 employees — air - traffic controllers, tax collectors and others — did not have direct equivalents, according to the BL Federal jobs have more limited salary ranges than private- sector jobs, some of which have million - dollar payouts. Key findings: • Federal. The federal pay premium cut across all job categories - white - collar, blue - collar, management- professional, technical any average salaries in the federal government; 36 paid better in the private sector. -Private. The private sector paid more on average in a select group of high -skill occupations, including lawyers, veterinarians and air computer research scientists made an average of $95,190, about $10,000 less than the average in the corporate world. -State and local. State government employees had an average salary of $47,231 in 2008, about 5% less than comparable jobs in th, earned an average of $43,589, about 2% more than private workers in similar jobs. State and local workers have higher total comper of benefits is included. Job comparison Average federal salaries exceed average private- sector pay in 83% of comparable occupations. A sampling of average annnual salai Job Federal Private Difference Airline pilot, copilot, flight engineer $93,690 $120,012 - $26,322 Broadcast technician $90,310 $49,265 $41,045 Budget analyst $73,140 $65,532 $7,608 Chemist $98,060 $72,120 $25,940 Civil engineer $85,970 $76,184 $9,786 Clergy $70,460 $39,247 $31,213 Computer, information systems manager $122,020 $115,705 $6,315 Computer support specialist $45,830 $54,875 - $9,045 Cook $38,400 $23,279 $15,121 Crane, tower operator $54,900 $44,044 $10,856 Dental assistant $36,170 $32,069 $4,101 Economist $101,020 $91,065 $9,955 Editors $42,210 $54,803 - $12,593 Electrical engineer $86,400 $84,653 $1,747 Financial analysts $87,400 $81,232 $6,168 Graphic designer $70,820 $46,565 $24,255 Highway maintenance worker $42,720 $31,376 $11,344 Janitor $30,110 $24,188 $5,922 Landscape architects $80,830 $58,380 $22,450 Laundry, dry- cleaning worker $33,100 $19,945 $13,155 Lawyer $123,660 $126,763 - $3,103 Librarian $76,110 $63,284 $12,826 Locomotive engineer $48,440 $63,125 - $14,685 Machinist $51,530 $44,315 $7,215 Mechanical engineer $88,690 $77,554 $11,136 Office clerk $34,260 $29,863 $4,397 Optometrist $61,530 $106,665 - $45,135 Paralegals $60,340 $48,890 $11,450 Pest control worker $48,670 $33,675 $14,995 Physicians, surgeons $176,050 $177,102 - $1,052 Physician assistant $77,770 $87,783 - $10,013 Procurement clerk $40,640 $34,082 $6,558 Public relations manager $132,410 $88,241 $44,169 Recreation worker $43,630 $21,671 $21,959 Registered nurse $74,460 $63,780 $10,680 Respiratory therapist $46,740 $50,443 - $3,703 Secretary $44,500 $33,829 $10,671 Sheet metal worker $49,700 $43,725 $5,975 Statistician $88,520 $78,065 $10,455 Surveyor $78,710 $67,336 $11,374 Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics, USA TODAY analysis Mandel on Innovation and Growth Public Sector Pay Outpaces Private Pay Posted in Pav, state and local budgets by Mike Mandel on May 3, 2010 We all know that state and local government finances are a mess. This chart helps explain why. {IMPORTANT NOTE: I REVISED THE CHART TO CORRECT A PROBLEM WITH THE INFLATION ADJUSTMENT} I o u 0 CD N I j I I i i Revised chart: Public Sector Pay Outpaces the Private Sector (wages and benefits, adjusted for inflation) 11 1?� - 1iin Ci �. I I r - }' ,_,� � :1 "' .a'. •mil'•, :l' .`1� i.>:`t ..�1 Data: BLS govt The top line tracks the real compensation of all state and local government workers —wages and benefits, adjusted for inflation. The lower line tracks the real compensation of all private sector workers. The data comes from the Employment Cost Index data published by the BLS. The chart shows that public and private sector pay rose in parallel from 2001 to 2004. Then the lines diverged. Since early 2005, public sector pay has risen by 5% in real terms. Meanwhile, private sector pay has been flat. This one fact explains much of the fiscal stress at the state and local level —why states such as New York, New Jersey, and California are in such a mess. State and local governments pay more than $1 trillion in compensation annually (actually, that's an astounding number –I had no idea it was that high). If compensation is 5% higher than it should be, that's $50 billion in excess pay costs for the state. And to and behold, that $50 billion would roughly cover the total size of the state budget gaps. For example, in February a survey found that the combined budget gap of all 50 states was $55 billion for the 2011 budget year and $62 billion for the 2012 budget year. (The survey was done by the National Governors Association and the National Association of State Budget Officers) Now, I'm not anti- government, by any means. But this trend is disturbing. In times of crisis and economic struggle, government workers should not be getting bigger pay increases than the private sector. The domestic private sector has really been struggling for a decade, both in terms of job and pay. But the public sector kept paying higher compensation. The arithmetic is very clear. State and local governments can't keep funding higher wages and better benefits for their workers, white the private sector struggles. As a wise man once said, you can't wring blood from a stone. And you can't ask troubled taxpayers to pony up bigger pay gains for government workers than they are getting themselves. Printed: 12/15/2010 4:33 PM * per 100,000 workers Page 1 of 3 File: bureau of labor statistics - most dangerous jobs - referenced 12- 15- 2010.doc Reported Fatalities* Injuries* Salary 1 129 61 $271950 Fisherman 2 116 7 $30,360 Logger 3 40 7 $49,140 Farmer 4 46 6 $47,170 Structural construction worker 5 37 5 $32,790 Sanitation worker 6 72 2 $111,680 Pilot 7 34 3 $37,430 Roofer 8 22 6 $46,540 Coal miner 9 23 5 $60,960 Merchant mariner 10 12 9 $37,400 Miller 11 30 3 $54,300 Power line installer 12 16 3 $51,410 Police officer 13 7 6 $45,700 Firefighter 14 24 1 $37,400 Oil and gas driller 15 13 3 $40,560 Cement Manufacturer 16 21 1 $25,820 Taxi and Limousine driver 17 22 4 $37,580 Truck driver 18 16 4 $43,630 Construction equipment operator 19 2 1 $27,200 Animal slaughter 20 8 4 $26,155 Security guard * per 100,000 workers Page 1 of 3 File: bureau of labor statistics - most dangerous jobs - referenced 12- 15- 2010.doc Selected occupations with high fatal injury rates, 2009* Fishers and related fishing workers Logging workers Aircraft pilots and flight engineers Farmers and ranchers Roofers Structural iron and steel workers Refuse and recyclable material collectors Industrial machinery installation, repair, and maintenance workers Driver /sales workers and heck drivers Construction laborers Printed: 12/15/2010 4:33 PM 100.0 56 -- -- - - - - -- — 61.8 34 57.1 63 - - -- - - -- — — 38.5 293 34.7 60 -- 30.3 18 ►5.2 19 Total fatal work injuries = 4,340 18.5 81 All corker fatal injure rate = 3-4 18.3 586 - -- 18.3 224 250 200 150 100 50 0 200 400 600 800 Fatal work injury rate Number of fatal work injuries (per 100,000 fall -time equivalent workers) Fatal work injury rates were highest for fishers. logg;ing workers, and aircraft pilots and flight engineers in 2009. Page 2 of 3 File: bureau of labor statistics - most dangerous jobs - referenced 12- 15- 2010.doc Printed: 12/15/2010 4:33 PM Manner in which fatal work injuries occurred, 2009* Fires and explosions (34 /6) Exposure to harmful substances or emironments (9 %) Total = 4,340 Falls incideats (14 %) Fan to lower level (12 %) Homicides Struck (12%) Assaults and by object ,violent acts (18 0/0) (10 %) Contact pith objects and equipment (17 %) Transportation incidents (39%) More fatal work, injuries resulted from transportation incidents than from any other event. Highway incidents alone accounted for one out of emery five fatal work injuries in 2009. 'Data for 2009 are preliminary. VOTE: Percentages may not add to totals because of rounding. 30URCE: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. Department of Labor, 2010. Page 3 of 3 File: bureau of labor statistics - most dangerous jobs - referenced 12- 15- 2010.doc 4 Paul and Constance Ratelle 5521 Valley Lane Edina, MN 55439 December 7, 2010 edinamail a,ci.edina.mn.us Mayor James Hovland Council Member Joni Bennett Council Member Mary Brindle Council Member Scot Housh Council Member Ann Swenson Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor and Council Members: DEC 0 r 6 iJ Steve Brown, formerly a candidate for the city council, has done this community a great service by providing a cogent analysis of the proposed bike path. His analysis is not subject to the criticism, expressed by certain members of this council and members of our community, that any critic of the path who lives adjacent to the path is a "NIMBY." I cannot improve on his analysis and so I offer it to you as Steve sent it to me (with a few minor edits for clarification) in an email after the October 12, 2010 meeting of the Edina Park Board when it voted to recommend that the City Council to approve a proposed Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail aligned along Nine Mile Creek: My criticism (of the proposed bike path) has to do with the process (by which the path has been considered by the City of Edina), and comes from my experience as a real estate consultant. In that capacity, I am driven by always being clear on the most critical question that should be asked up front, "What it is we are solving for ?" Question: What "biker" are we solving for in the proposed solution? Question: Is this really a "bigger" picture issue, which plays to our role in a broader Hennepin County trail system, and really has nothing to do with Edina biking needs at all? In my limited research, I have learned that there are essentially 4 categories of bikers: 1. Commuter bikers. They bike every day, almost everywhere, and the do it 365 days a year, rain, snow or sun. Mayor and Council Members December 7, 2010 Page 2 2. What John Keprios refers to as "spider man" bikers. Those that are intense riders, often riding in packs on extensive routes at high speeds. According to John Keprios, these riders will not use this path, and will continue to use hard surface roadways for their activities. 3. Recreational bikers. Those that want the ability to bike safely around Edina with their family. They will seldom ride on the Loose Line trail, and really are primarily interested in safe travel around the city. 4. The "tweener ". My girlfriend falls into this category. She is a tri- athlete, and rides the Loose Line all the time. She wants to be able . to get there safely, without the fear of getting hit by a car. She would use this path if it were built, but her access would be very limited based upon where she lives. During the Comprehensive Plan process, we learned that two of the most desired things people wanted (were) recreational biking (Group 3), and (preservation of) our green space and wetlands. The proposed path cuts through the center of the city and directly along Nine Mile creek. Its design is driven to connect to other communities (Richfield & Hopkins) to a larger trail system. But the majority of Edina residents won't have convenient access to it. So who is it being built for? • It's not a fit for Group 1, the commuters. • The spider man group won't use it according to John ( Keprios), so group 2 is out. • It doesn't accomplish the objectives of Group 3, because most people can't get to it safely, and it doesn't provide circulation throughout Edina. • Group 4 might be a prominent user, but needs to get to it in order to use it similar to Group 3. Not sure how big this user group is, either. • Maybe this really is a "bigger picture" issue, but if so, let's call a spade a spade. Here are my concerns, and why I am critical of the process: • The information that is being used as the basis for the decision making is a Study of only people that was conducted in 2006. A Mayor and Council Members December 7, 2010 Page 3 It is too old, and too small, in my opinion. Much has changed since 2006. • The feedback on potential path preference included only 200 responses from CAT members. This again is way too small, in my opinion. • To me, it is unclear which biking group we are solving for, if we are even solving for a biking group? It isn't congruent with what I heard from residents in the Comp Plan review, which reinforces my comments about the my two earlier points. • From what I have seen, there is no clarity of how much each resident will be paying when the project is finished, or what formula will be used to calculate it? There are significant ranges floating around, and no clear answer, at least that I am aware of. • There has been huge concerns raised about assessment for streets, and an over bloated city budget during this campaign. How does this project impact that budget? • There are major issues associated with deeding the property to Three Rivers that have not been addressed or even discussed. Edina gives up control of this pristine land forever, and it is critical that appropriate protections be part of any preliminary approval, because you give up your leverage once to approve a specific plan. • There are numerous operational issues that have a potential financial impact on the City that have not been answered. Police, after hours, maintenance, liability, permitted activities, damages, etc. In summary, I attended the last Park Board meeting, and was appalled at how many holes there were in the Three Rivers presentation. I lost count at how many times the representative from Three Rivers said, "we can discuss that," "we will work with you on that," "we will work with the resident on that," when asked about issues related to potential costs or operational issues associated with the proposed trail. To me, this is a $25- $30 million real estate project that winds directly through our city and which impacts many of our residents. The potential variances in costs that were dismissed under the guise of, "we'll work with you on that," are the kinds of items that cause projects to run significantly over budget, or have individual property owners blindsided by costs they were not anticipating, or expectations they had that are not met. No one, in my opinion, wins when that happens. In my opinion, for a project at this stage, looking for approval to move forward, the information presented was extremely incomplete, and does not reach a satisfactory level to warrant a decision. Professionally, if I were interviewing for an assigmnent with a client, and I presented information for a decision of the magnitude that this project Mayor and Council Members December 7, 2010 Page 4 represents, and it was as incomplete as this information was, I would never get hired. Personally, I think the city deserves better and more complete information before making a decision. In my opinion, this is an extremely complicated project, more than meets the eye. And I certainly do not mean to dismiss, or be disrespectful, of the time people have committed to working on it. As a civil servant, I am grateful for such involvement. My comments are directed at the leadership and stewardship that have been guiding the process, and the significant areas of risk for Edina, and unanswered questions for our citizens, that exist as approval is being considered. In my opinion, it's a half baked cake, and it's not ready to be served. This is a project that has permanent ramifications and repercussion on the city, our wetlands, and potentially many hundred's of our residents. If not done properly, with the appropriate due diligence and education to the community, this could have a detrimental impact on our city, as opposed to a positive one. For our part, my wife and I have spoken to several members of the city council about this project and expressed our strong objections to this project. We have been appreciative of the attention we have received from you as we have discussed those objections. Among our objections has been TRPD's consistently negative attitude toward members of our community whose homes and lives will be directly impacted by this project. To date, we remain concerned that the TRPD will not work with residents whose homes and lives will be directly and negatively affected by the trail; that TRPD will continue to disregard and dismiss residents' preferences as to the placement and type of path to be built near our homes; that there is no mechanism or process for the residents to address and resolve grievances that will likely arise as TRPD proceeds to build its trail through our community. As Steve Brown correctly notes this project is too complicated and involved for it to be approved at present given the many open issues and questions TRPD has yet to address, let alone resolve. This situation does not bode well for the residents of this community where the City of Edina plans to cede control of land within its boundaries to a group of employees of TRPD who have been and will remain unaccountable to the residents of this community whose lives will be irreparably affected by this trail. Mayor and Council Members December 7, 2010 Page 5 There is and should be no hurry in approving this project. It is premature for this Council . to approve TRPD's proposed bike path, whether it is road or creek based. We, therefore, strongly recommend that further consideration of the proposed bike path be tabled until the many open issues and questions concerning the proposed path, including those raised by Steve Brown, are fully answered. r,� erely, IJL. Paul and Cons ance Ratelle cc: Steve Brown /-A O H -,Vco E REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VII. A. -2 DEBRA MANGEN Action From: CITY CLERK Discussion ® Information Date: DECEMBER 21, 2010 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED AFTER PACKETS INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received. after the packets were delivered to you. HENRY HACKER 460 5th Avenue North, 0210 Hopkins, Minnesota 55343 -1403 952 - 935 -2073 fee. �e-FP� Lon� e- � /lam Y/& mac,{ /S �j di0 flj�yc /P Y °iAa� 19PIS 1 ff/1 �O/ /ee,�d�Fati�7�al4 / //� /nnes���fl it �EZy- ��j`fory� ov�Y�s�s /nom �est�- �J�Ifs��1s- `f✓o�uau�- ��6 zo /o DEC j 7010 + SA. P twincitie5.[om _ St. Paul Pioneer Press 3 • I s y . Graf f is f orceme. '� #oo lax on By Ashley Halsey:lll - report says, "In other court council's Transportation ance in many, state capitals Washington post tries; public .officials have Research Beard anii released until the = federal govern ' = declared that this human and Nov 16, recommends that Con went threatened to with j WASHINGTON Thou= economic Z cost is , neither gress glue the U S Transports hold highyvay funds from sands; of people could ;be saved inevitable p acceptable tion bepartment greater those that° refused toy coin from Heath on America s roads The number of traffic fatah authority to help states raiser° ply The speed limit,` once set ' each year if drivers embrace ties viii the U S da5t year '— safety standards `- at r55 mph;�how is `up to 115 strict drunken driving enforce,a 33,808 " was the lowest since But that'careful wording, and mph �n 11 states Laws. ' f merit ?and ndespread use of 1949, but other countries saw obs.dMtions elsewhere in .the regarding use of motorcycle;;. speed cameras, winch 'have far more significant`' drops': If repoi underscore ;the polite helmets have been weak >..l helped cut fatahhes .liy half iii the: ?Umted :States :had made cal ;sensitivity ,of j proposing tined m many states since, fifteen income countries; the same rogress in reducing deeper federal mvolvementan .1976, and `nove only about; accordumig to` a' major new deaths as Britain did between what traditionally :has been half requu a their ise for all I study 1997 . and $,;29,000 more the'domam of state legislators riders x ) The: U S is .far behind ether Americans 'would still lie Tlie twm _issues of political By' contrast, the .legal.I developed countries :when it alive: 5 will .and public aCCeptance will blood alcohol limit has been { comes to pursuing strategies The comparisons were made determine whether the life reduced tq 0 05 percent <;or that 'reduce traffic fatalities by transportation` experts at saving steps successful `in F lower in Australia, Japan -.; Since .1995; FY ance ;has ciit thelVational Research Council, other'developednatons canbe drill most ,European coon deaths by' 2 percent, Great a 94 year,old organizatign taken m the United, States tries, with, the exception of Britain by 38 `percent and Aus founded by the National Acad In eatam,n;ng successes` else r Ireland j aril Great Britai n traha'_ by 25 ;percent In the euues where, the'researchers found Many' of4 ;thoseti countries , Umtetl States, they'd ffi p - d Their 175 page report says.a there had been much tougher enforce those _"Aimits Through,: by 19 percent ` + system that unparts much enforcement against drunken muchmore widespreadaise "The lack of progress , ui responsibility for ,roadway driving and:speeding, and they of sobriety testing; , reducing the highway;casualty safety to state and local gov also_pomted to use of motorcy , tIn France;^one u} 3 6 driv toll might suggest that Ameri- ermrients puts theU S at a dis cle helmets. All thee histori ers, gets tested each year In cans']iavere'signedthemselves advantage compared to coon all have been hot bufton S deden it's one m,28 dr v 1. to this burden of deaths and tries_'where' ceniral govern issues m state legislatures ers. Anc� ul one; Australian - -. m)uries as the inevitable con- merit sets traffic laws and start A movement to reduce the Mate the rate is one` tesEpT .; sequence of the mobility pro; dards ` legal limit for blood_ alcohol to ;' l�fi drivers There are rio vided, by the road system;" the . The :report, written by the ' 0.08 'percent faced stiff 'resist comparable figures for the l;'' - ;IJ;S, but�the report specu.,;,, ates the ;rate is well belogv thaf, of B tam,, one m ev¢iy, ,:l 56 drivers:.''' Lh abrie t3! e of -ts are tS t ' ,P used infrequently in the" Unuted.. states, :arid They are not!1§6 ii 12 states, uiclud ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS W9 Texas; wlueh says�th'ey. P are UIICOnStitllti at { i St. Paul, Minnesota Intensive use of T sliced cameras hasrecerve�d stroiSg ;.i November 21, 2010 pohtical`sgppor`t . eN W ere, _I with Anstral�anc usmg them; k on "mayor interstate high Is the U.S. too lax on traffic enforcement? ways and ranee deploying ar integrated netyork "of...I Yes it is, please read Oct. 15, 2010 Mpls. Star Tribune _ :2;3oo and repordngy ign fi ; i article about the Edina, Minnesota police dept. cant redactionsaii average; Since it has been writing more tickets for traffic speeds In the U.S , 12 sates slid: °. violations, crashes have dropped significantly. the District of Columbia use. l speed cameras and IO states Have lawsprohtibsituig :ise Moststates -that allow .; their use" =restrict `them to - - worlk.and= schoolzones� �: , The report sand successful .: programs that have iediiced fatalities, elsewjiere "rely oil;{ r aiieasuresthat are''Tegar dec . intlie United States as pout ¢ ically;controversial pr legal lyimpermissible "- inaj treets: mot the. }lace to..fee�d nfeed f or. s eed _._ - _ ABBY sIMQNS i a e IY 'a point= of pride, Edina offi s The d takes pn lIt S moos @stactribunecom a ' - �� cias say "If:thats thie reputarior we fiave, OM'- its�best to make people. Shovid`5low did " to the wise. Edua._ down _and be careful;aen I think loves nailing "speeders ? - SLIYe ]people paT for we ve been successfiiL said Sgt Th e well - heeled: suburb: . =`� Phil Larsen, he ad of the Edina l?o dnving over the limit __. oss -h: tchedby.'some of the met-: lice Department's Traffic Enforce- 's busiest highways has developed - ment Divisions eputation mr being tougli'on lead Vikings star Adrian Peterson zing wrote more The Muinesota State Three of the cit}�s 51 officei s fo- ots;; ing .though at 109. miles .per hour Patrol -wrote G,1G1 statewide; l -ufno cus .solely of traffic: enforcement; The National Motonsts Associa -: last December In July alone; Edina single $fate Patroldistnct beat the -- reporting to where m_ ost violations website.lists Edina as the Min wrote 913 sgeedin -i tions, more'. Edina traffic unit, wjuchwrofe more occur feeder streets that "cut across sofa (city ;undez 100,00p,,people than all but two ofL58 enforcement '' than double'the number tha,Eden, -the city, including W 50th Street; Ith the most speed {traps Y. agencies in a statevvtde crackdown. Prairie, Burnsville,�MapYe Groye anal Edina cops, clocked; -:A esofai Only Minneapolis ..11,St Pauli. Muinetonka.eachv rote EdmaconhniesonA7► r �. ®.. — - ; sets f Edina a l}i g EDINA "FROM. Al They. cut through. 30 mph TOP-10 NiT1a0 an hour; Shane said, `because suburban streets, often'speed �URL�'DIC1` 01 FOR [the police deparmnent's] mam France Avenue, W 70th and W in and: rollin throw sto SPEEDi11TG TICKETS* goal is to raise revenue g g; P . i 77th streets, and, Hwys . 621169 signs. Police got more'and more' i. st Paul i;67s :`Their- time could be better --= and 100. = calls from uOset residents; and z Minneapolis 1;004 - spent onhiurglaries and aggra It's not . just ab -out writing the CityCp6,tft approved the 3 edina . _- 9is. vated assaults;: devoting. their I ; _ c 4 State Patrol (Golden Valley} 7.77 time t0 the Safety.Of the: Golll tickets but: about being: 'seen. ahree traffic officers Since then, . writing them, said Bob O Brien, I arsen said, fatalities and crash state Patrol (oakdale) :.7ss " munity instead;of tying up three t Law Enforcement Liaison for:.. es have dropped`significantly' a g400m�n9ton_ 6z7 ocers .Qri petty misdemean 7 Plymouth '428 the state .Department of Pub The city's first fatal crash m . ors, but I suppose they have the - 1 _ 8 Airport Police 403 law on their side'', liaSafety (DPS). It_gave Edina `seven years happened Sept 1;. g Minnetonka ` -384, ' x.$55,000 grant to pay overtime ;-when an alleged dnmken dnv io Mapte cro'v "e 3 :Larsen said, Edina receives i fo.'r additionalenforcement dur er stniek and killed 53 =year old' tour ris.�uly:a5 Part of the state'ssafe ' about $25 of a $142 citation, ` irig DPS's Safe and Sober. ini � ..Robert- Kuntze as he rodeaiis angsobercampalgn withtherestgoirigtoHennepm tiafive, which included extra motor -scooter at Vernon Av_e sources. Minnesota Department of Public =County and the state'for =pros ' s ceding enforcement in July. riue andkanson,Road ChriMias• safety; ec- -upon costs, drug abuse pro ?`If you -take care of -tiie lit NealRogatiscliar`gedwithcnm grams'.and other- public'needs tle thuigs thie big things fall in "inal vehicular homicide in :con- If ah;the tickets written in Eduia place, ' O'Brien 'said 'When ' nection with the: crash :. part, but "I would like to think' at in July were paid, it would put at you. have ' high visibility' en Ini999 thecity lead 843 crash least we had a hand in it 'Need least $22,825 into city coffers i, forcement-it reduces crime, 1 ; "es, ineludmg323 inwh i - isomer less l: say, not everyo ie�s a fan Larsen said eight to 10 per s : rediices stashes" and.it reduces' one was "injuied: In,2009 there of the heavy enforcement Min= cent of traffic stops result m calls f, r ervice: I.t s a quality -: were, 624 crashesfth -. ith inlii neapolis defense attorneyRob warnings. " Let's face it,' he "said, 'f•life issue When they're out ries..Tho city. had one"fatalityin ert T.-Shane frequently handles "not "everybody: is happy with there, the•citizens feel better ' ; ,1999 and none,last year traffrc cases; uicluding speed the lob wp are doing but our ^ f VV °a ' *LarSen--said th`e eity's.crack The Department of :Public " trig Pickets, which he says can 'residents are happy with the job down on speeders "began Safety commerided:Bdiiia po frequently-b'edismissed we are doing eveniftheyare around 1989, after increasing lice last month. for such num It's unfortunate for every the ones getting ticketed" congesfion `caused' more dnv bers Larsen said safer cars and body else out there; who goes �r'ers'fo avoid freeways greatei use of seat beltsplayed a overthe limitmaybe five miles Abby simonsz; siz 673 -a9zi MPLS. STAR TRIBUNE Minneapolis, Minnesota October 15, 2010 DECEIVED DEC 1010 MINUTES OF THE Edina Transportation Commission Thursday, October 21, 2010 Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Council, Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Jennifer Janovy, Michael Schroeder, Josh Sprague, Tom Bonneville, Nathan Franzen, Jean White, MEMBERS ABSENT: Geof. Workinger, Paul Nelson, Sarah Engbretson STAFF PRESENT: Jack Sullivan, Sharon Allison I. Call to .Order The- meeting was called order by chair Janovy. II. Approval of Minutes a. Regular Meeting of September 16, 2010 Commissioner Schroeder, moved to approve the minutes of September 16, with the following corrections: Item VII.a. Delete "...said, Phase 1' if ETC wants. to be informed about..." and add '...reported that construction of Phase I (bicycle route for which, the:City received a Transit for Livable Communities -grant) is scheduled for 2011.. She said -the BETF would like to be kept informed and asked if the ETC should also have a role in receiving information about and/or commenting on, this: project.' The motion was seconded by Commissioner White.-All voted aye. III. Consent Agenda a. Traffic Safety Report of September 1. 2010 Chair Janovy said clarity_ is needed: in understanding the requirement for establishing bike lanes. She asked if it is with a, resolution or ordinance and said W. 58th is being done using neither. Assistant city engineer Sullivan said W. 70th Street is the only other street that Council has approved for bike lanes and it was done with a resolution. Mt. Sullivan will get clarification and report back. Regarding the calls received from residents, chair Janovy asked how is traffic safety issues defined and when is an issue forwarded to the Traffic Safety Committee: Mr. Sullivan said Mr. Tate, traffic safety coordinator, being a: retired police office is given some liberty in deciding what moves forward. He. said Mr. Tate's first attempt is to educate callers.. He said further that issues such as speeding are referred to the. NTMP while regulatory- related issues%go directly to the Traffic Safety Committee. Regarding the discussion about Xerxes Avenue; Commissioner Bonneville. said he is interested in the ETC getting the ADT for the entire length of Xerxes and York Avenues from TH-494 to the crosstown to begin a long term analysis. 0 Commissioner Schroeder moved to approve the Traffic Safety Report of September 1, 2010, and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Franzen. All voted aye. IV. Community Comment None. V. New Business a. State Aid Road Reconstruction Planninq Mr. Sullivan said similar to neighborhood street reconstruction, there is a schedule for State Aid streets. He said these streets are funded by gas tax funds and the City generally receives $1.2 million annually. He said residents are assessed 20% of the cost and the balance is paid by State Aid funds. State Aid streets scheduled for reconstruction in 2011 are W. 44th Street from France Avenue to TH -100, and W. 70th Street from France Avenue to TH -100. b. Truck Routes in Edina Chair Janovy said an email was received from a resident regarding truck traffic on Gleason Road which was handled by the Traffic Safety Committee and the Traffic Safety Report dated October 19 was approved by Council with minor correction. Mr. Sullivan said this issue is raised by residents quite often, and while the City can set truck routes, the preference is not to do so for various reasons, example, difficult to enforce, expensive for signage, impeding deliveries on non -truck routes and, most residents would not favor their street becoming a truck route. Additionally, trucks cannot be eliminated from State Aid roads such as Gleason Road. Discussion included when do you change or eliminate a code and Mr. Sullivan said when it comes to staff's attention; how influential is the City over County roads and Mr. Sullivan said staff has a good working relationship with the County and they do seek the City's input and recommendation; should the ETC be made aware of the County's plans and Mr. Sullivan said they do have a similar plan like the City's; ETC looking at W. 76th Street to see if opportunities exist to sign it as a truck route; and spring load restrictions which is set by Mn /DOT and followed by the City. c. Xerxes Avenue Overview Mr. Sullivan said Mn /DOT is planning to replace the Xerxes Avenue Bridge over TH-494 and have solicited input from the cities of Bloomington, Edina and Richfield, and Hennepin County. He said replacing the bridge was approved as far back as 10 years ago as part of Mn /DOT's long range forecasting. Plans include a bike route but does not include on /off ramps because the intersection spacing criteria (both federal and state) does not allow the appropriate distance for the weaving of the ramps. Mr. Sullivan said the bridge is outside the City limits but Edina will be impacted by its traffic. Construction is expected to begin in 2011 at a cost of $16 million. During discussion Mr. Sullivan was asked about the France Avenue Bridge over crosstown and he said the County should be in discussion with Mn /DOT over the winter. He was also asked about the process for public input on a decision that was made 10 years ago. Mr. Sullivan said planning probably began 15 years ago and moving forward, they should probably see what Mn /DOT's long range plan is for 20 -30 years out. He said he is not aware of crosstown being on their radar. 2 d. W. 60th Street/France Avenue Chair Janovy said a resident is concerned that the restriping of France Avenue would cause cars traveling westbound on W. 60th Street and wanting to go southbound on France to cause cueing and that drivers would divert to W. 58th Street. Mr. Sullivan said W. 60th Street is a T- intersection that meets clear zone requirements and has had 18 accidents within the past 10 years, with five personal injuries; W. 58th Street he said is a 4 -way intersection with 17,000 cars passing through and it has had 54 accidents within the past 10 years with 18 personal injuries. He said many of the accidents were associated with the 2 -lanes being driven as 4 -lanes and in the past 2Y2 months since the restriping there have not been any accidents and the police department has even commented on how civil traffic has been. He said some drivers may choose to go to W. 58th Street and as a State Aid road, it is signalized to carry more traffic. Mr. Sullivan said it is hard to see how the intersection can be improved upon to change the W. 60th Street left-movement without installing a traffic signal and neither the City nor the County is interested in putting in a signal. In the short term, Mr. Sullivan said the redesign appears to be working, and he suggested taking another look in one year. Commissioner Bonneville asked if the Traffic Safety Committee has looked at the possibility of removing the signal at W. 58th Street and changing it to a 4 -way, and changing W. 60th Street to a 3 -way because it feels like an extension of W. 50th Street. Mr. Sullivan said they have not but this would mirror Xerxes and W. 60th Street. e. Three Rivers Park District — ETC role in the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Chair Janovy said after the Park Board meeting, she received several emails from people asking if the ETC was going to weigh -in on recommending a bike route and alignment. She said she would like the ETC to decide what their role should be. She said a public hearing is scheduled for December 7 for the Council to select an alignment (creek bed or road base) but they would not know for three years how the trail would interact with the road. During discussion, it was noted that the trail would be running close to backyards and chair Janovy said the focus should be on where the ETC has authority. She said when the alignment is chosen they will have an important role to play. Commissioner White motion that they not make a recommendation on the proposed trail alignment and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Sprague. All voted aye. VI. Planning Commission Update (Commissioner Schroeder) Commissioner Schroeder said they continue to work on amendments to ordinances related to PUDs; conditional use permits related to a recent Supreme Court ruling, and driveway widths. VII. Bike Edina Task Force Update (Commissioner Janovy) Chair Janovy said their focus was on the Bicycle Friendly Community application which is a designation that cities can receive and the process is a useful tool to identify where the City can improve and have a long range vision. She said also that there is a sense that the BETF would like to be communicated with regarding biking infrastructure such as W. 58th Street. 3 VIII. Staff Liaison Comments a. 70th Street Reconstruction Update Mr. Sullivan said the preconstruction meeting took place today with the contractor. He said the work will be done from the west working easterly and that there would be some road closure in certain areas. He said the ETC will continue to receive updates. Mr. Sullivan said Commissioners should have received an invitation in their packet to attend a workshop. He said a reception is scheduled for the new city manager and that he will be attending the next meeting to introduce himself. IX. Commissioners Comments None. X. Adjournment Meeting adjourned at 8:05 p.m. rd MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner SUBJECT: 2010 Metropolitan Council Housing Performance Score DATE: December 21, 2010 The results of the Metropolitan Council's Housing Performance Survey are attached for your review. Edina has received a score of "68" out of a possible 100 points; that score is 11 points lower than the final 2009 score of "79 ", yet the same as the 2008 score. The difference in points from 2009 occurred in the following areas: # 1. Loss of 2 points for the percentage of owner- occupied housing with an assessed valuation equal to or lower than the amount affordable to households at 80% of the median income and the total number of mobile homes in the community. #4. Loss of 1 point for percentage of net units added to the housing stock that were affordable. #8 Additional 3 points for initiatives regarding housing preservation and rehabilitation. #9. Loss of 11 points for density of new residential development; 2010 - 28 units* 2009 - 273 units *In 2010, no new multi - family residential units were added. Attached for your information you will find the 2010 survey, the "Guidelines for Priority Funding for Housing Performance ", the 2009 survey results, as well as Livable Communities Act (LCA) information from the Metropolitan Council. it Metropolitan Council November 19, 2010 TO: Local Officials FROM: Guy Peterson, Director, Community Development Division The 2010 housing performance score for your community is enclosed. The scores were determined based on several factors set forth in the Council's Guidelines for Priority Funding for Housing Performance. Seventy percent of the score came from the survey you completed about housing activity in your community during the past two years. It included information about: • local fiscal, regulatory, and housing rehabilitation initiatives to facilitate affordable, workforce housing development and preservation • the density of residential development • the approval of affordable or life -cycle housing that has not yet been developed The other 30 percent of the score was determined from data about your community's housing: • the affordability of owned housing units • the diversification of housing type • the number of affordable rental units • the availability of housing in your community for persons with special needs The performance scores are intended to reflect both the amount of affordable and life - cycle housing in the community and the community's efforts to facilitate affordable and life -cycle housing development and preservation. Scores range widely, reflecting the variety of metropolitan area communities. The sparse population and scattered housing locations of rural, unsewered communities tend to result in lower scores, while the affordability and diversification of existing housing stock in urban, sewered communities, combined with efforts to add and /or preserve such housing, yield higher scores. As indicated in the Council's Livable Communities Act grant request solicitation materials, the housing performance scores will be one of the factors considered in the evaluation and ranking of applications for competitive funding programs. If you have any questions or want to discuss your community's score, please call me at 651 - 602 -1418. Thank you. Enclosure n:CUr111T1dc ti'�IIYCiInI[rl Ica``pereisoti'�2i11. Q'hnus in g perlurrrmnct�1111910locial okI finid Im is ingperi:bmincesuores.di c www.metrocouncil.org 390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 55101 -1805 • (651) 602 -1000 • Fax (651) 602 -1550 • = (651) 291 -0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer Final Housing Performance Score — 2010 Name of City/Township Edina Criteria —100 points possible 1. z 2. 3 3. 7 4. 5. 3 6. 7. 8. 9. a. b. 10. Total Final Score Final Score 2009 79 I zor Vin i 11, !,1 ,i I-, ,4 Pk": I't, I, I% ao"", C�10:"Q Final Housing Performance Score — 2009 Name of City/Township Edina Criteria —100 points possible 1. 2. 3 3. 7 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. a. b. 10. Total Final Score Final Score 2008 68 CRITERIA 1- % Affordable Owner - Occupied 2 - % Affordable Rental 3 - % Hsg. Not Typical 4 - Affordable Units Added 5 - Hsg. For Special Needs 6 - Fiscal Tools 7 - Local Regulations & Dev: Requir 8 - Hsg.Preserv. & Rehab. 9a - Density Attached 9b - Density Detached 10 - Land Acquis. For Aff. Hsg. Dev. TOTAL LIVABLE COMMU. .ES ACT (LCA) HOUSING PERFORMANCE SCORES CITY OF EDINA MAX. SCORE 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 8 3 3 4 5 4 4 2 8 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 8, 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 10� 9 10 9 7 7 6 5 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 15 12 15 15 12 12 12 12 15 0 0 6 9 15 15 15 15, 15 15 12 15 15 12 15 0 -6 4 3 3 5 0 5 0 0 -6 3 2 2 3 0 6 0 0 -6 2 2 2 2 2 6 6 100 61 63 66 71 68 79 68 2010 Affordable Housing Production Survey submit Form Community name: Edina Name of primary person completing the survey: Joyce Repya Telephone: 952 - 826 -0462 E -mail address: jrepya @ci.edina.mn.us 1. The following table displays the information your municipality reported on the Metropolitan Council's 2009 Residential Construction Activity Survey. Please identify, to the best of your knowledge, the numbers of units intended for owner - occupied or rental property: Housing Type Total units permitted Owner-occupied Rental Single- family detached 28 28 0 Townhomes 0 0 0 Duplex, triplex, quad 0 0 0 Multifamily (5 +) 0 0 0 2. According to Housing Link,- financing closed in 2009 for the following affordable rental developments in your municipality: None Are you aware of any additional affordable rental developments, including rehabilitations for which financing transformed market rate units into affordable units? ✓ No Yes (Please list below) It Metropolitan Council 3. How many housing units have been built overall in your municipality through 2009 using zero -lot -line* or other atypical detached housing site plan approaches to increase development density? (Through 2009, your municipality reported 1516 detached housing units developed using zero -lot -line or other atypical detached housing site plan approaches in your municipality. Do not include manufactured housing units in manufactured home parks.) * Zero -lot line: Parcels where detached units are sited /constructed near or at the boundaries of the lot, which leaves little space between the units. 1,516 units 4. In the Metropolitan Council's Residential Construction Activity Survey, your municipality reported the following quantities of housing units removed from the housing stock. How many housing units were removed from your municipality's housing stock in 2009 due to city initiatives? *City initiatives: Any removal or demolition of a housing unit that is mandated by the city, i.e., to allow road construction; for development; or to remove vacant or nuisance units. You may need to return to Page 1 to submit this survey. 201C ropolitan Council Affordable Housing Survey 2 Removed from stock due to city Housing a Quantity reported removed from stock initiatives* Single family detached 18 0 Townhomes 0 0 Duplex / triplex / quad 0 0 Multifamily units (5 +) 0 0 Manufactured housing units (not included in the 2009 Building Permit Survey) *City initiatives: Any removal or demolition of a housing unit that is mandated by the city, i.e., to allow road construction; for development; or to remove vacant or nuisance units. You may need to return to Page 1 to submit this survey. 201C ropolitan Council Affordable Housing Survey 2 5. Please identify no more than five local fiscal tools or initiatives that are available from the city to assist /facilitate the development or preservation of affordable or life -cycle housing. Clicking on the box turns on the check -mark. You may need to return to Page 1 to submit this survey. 2010 Metropolitan Council Affordable Housing Survey 3 Collaboration and participation with: a community land trust; philanthropic foundation; or other non - profit organization to preserve long -term affordability Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds ✓ Credit enhancements General obligation bonds Housing revenue bonds Land write -down, sale, or acquisition ✓ Livable Communities Grants Local fee waivers or reductions Local property tax levy Local tax abatement Tax increment financing (TIF) Taxable revenue bonds Other (please describe): East Edina Housing Foundation's Come Home 2 Edina 2nd mortgage program assisting low /mod. borrowers* purchase homes (SF & multi - family) in Edina. Max. purchase price $325,000 & Max. loan $60,000. 2009 = 9 loans totaling $471,750; 2008 = 4 loans totaling $240,000; 2007 = 2 loans totaling $82,000. * Income limits same as Minnesota Mortgage Program. 0 Q 0 You may need to return to Page 1 to submit this survey. 2010 Metropolitan Council Affordable Housing Survey 3 Q Please identify examples during 2009 in which your municipality reduced, adjusted, eliminated, waived, or in some fashion was flexible in the implementation of a local official control, development, or building requirement; OR for which it is the municipality's policy and practice to reduce, adjust or eliminate such requirement, when requested to do so, to reduce development costs for the development of affordable or life -cycle housing. Up to five examples of the application may be identified, but no more than two for any single housing project. Other: 201C ropolitan Council Affordable Housing survey You may need to return to Page 1 to submit this su 4 �. 4a CM .. a) E Q L_ U i C p aJ X a) t v D C m .L c0 c0 D a) L L Y U 7 Cr +1 t y N 'O_ aJ f0 > � L f0 l0 a) C> 7 4 L W CM C U M a1 U > C N U O O� n aJ W ai C .a t O C 0 E c .c C °u C a) > C E M fC Ul U C +r .Oi (Lu E �L L v E a m 3 C o ° '� o 'L° Z 0 a i L U a v C W > y O 0 > f0 N U C C C O Q 0 .2 'C O U y v V N M ice+ O r0 °3 v, 2 C v a a 0 3 �• a u m L �`a O m u U W U W L_ O —o c° c ?� 't 4J 1A ul L 7 +O+ O o LV � C v m o c c x > a� a.+ v lu v o a L +� ca M L co +� d Q E U p p u ,, .. a oC u� to U cn u) cn a a m a O Ebenezer - 7500 York Avenue ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 01 ❑ Ll ✓ I-LIL -A I _1[ I L11 11 F ]III IFIF Other: 201C ropolitan Council Affordable Housing survey You may need to return to Page 1 to submit this su 4 7. Please identify the your community in applicable.) housing preservation /maintenance activities your municipality conducted or that were available in 2009 to maintain or improve your existing housing stock. (County- administered programs are 31 Watt- qM�Kfd&U yG`t #War YLrr►(V,e� t� - tk�,x� tlr LLtI,/x� e lG�� J �.Le.,/ruu�k. You may need to return to Page 1 to submit this survey. 2010 Metropolitan Council Affordable Housing Survey 5 Available in 2009 Housing maintenance code and enforcement (includes inspections) For rental housing (includes licensing) For owner - occupied housing ✓ Housing rehabilitation loan or grant programs For rental housing For owner - occupied housing ✓ Local tool sharing center or program (includes fairs or advisors) Acquisition /rehabilitation /resale initiative or program ✓ Other (please describe) 1. $500,000 loan /grant to Oak Glen Townhomes to rehab units and maintain Section 8 status. 2. Senior Communitv Service's H.O.M.E Grant - $26.000 ✓ 31 Watt- qM�Kfd&U yG`t #War YLrr►(V,e� t� - tk�,x� tlr LLtI,/x� e lG�� J �.Le.,/ruu�k. You may need to return to Page 1 to submit this survey. 2010 Metropolitan Council Affordable Housing Survey 5 8. Please indicate the overall average net density* and number of new sewered residential were issued in 2009. Please provide the density to the nearest one -tenth unit per acre. NOTE: If your community participates in the Plat Monitoring Program, please do not fill units for which building permits out Question 8. *The formula for calculating net residential density is as follows: Net Residential Density = Total Units _ (Total Area - Total Area Adjustments) Total Area Adjustments mean the exclusion of: Arterial road right -of -way Wetlands and water bodies Public parks and trails • Natural resources mapped in the comprehensive plan and protected by ordinance Outlots for future or non - residential development Local streets, alleys and sidewalks, as well as private parks, pools and tennis courts are not excluded from the total area. You may need to return to Page 1 to submit this survey. 201C ropolitan Council Affordable Housing Survey 6 Number of sewered units permitted in 2009 Number of unsewered units permitted in 2009 Single- family detached units Number of units permitted (from the Building Permits Survey) 28 Net density per acre 2.3 Attached units (townhomes, duplex, triplex, quad and multifamily Number of units permitted 0 Net density per acre *The formula for calculating net residential density is as follows: Net Residential Density = Total Units _ (Total Area - Total Area Adjustments) Total Area Adjustments mean the exclusion of: Arterial road right -of -way Wetlands and water bodies Public parks and trails • Natural resources mapped in the comprehensive plan and protected by ordinance Outlots for future or non - residential development Local streets, alleys and sidewalks, as well as private parks, pools and tennis courts are not excluded from the total area. You may need to return to Page 1 to submit this survey. 201C ropolitan Council Affordable Housing Survey 6 10. In 2009, did your community acquire land to be held for the development of new affordable family housing or any senior housing (exclusively 55 +) but for which no housing units have been constructed or started? ✓ No Yes I If yes, describe the land acquisition and the intended development for such land: In 2009, did your community approve the development, reuse of, or municipal reinvestment in existing housing for future use as affordable family housing or senior housing where the development has not yet been undertaken or completed for reasons beyond the municipality's control? No ✓ Yes I If yes, how many units are currently planned for development? 76 units (55 +) on 2 acres 11. During calendar year 2009, did your community expend local dollars toward affordable or life -cycle housing representing at least 85 percent of your municipality's Affordable and Life -Cycle Housing Opportunities Amount ( ALHOA)* of $288,080 ? No I ✓ I Yes I If no, please explain why ALHOA expenditures were not made: *ALHOA: The Affordable and Life -Cycle Housing Opportunities Amount (ALHOA) represents the minimum amount of local discretionary expenditures or contributions to assist the development or preservation of affordable and life -cycle housing for that participation year. The ALHOA is not a grant from the Livable Communities Act (LCA). It is a required local contribution or expenditure of local dollars on affordable housing. In order to continue to participate in the LCA program, communities must expend or contribute at least 85 percent of their ALHOA obligation for the applicable year. Communities have some flexibility in determining which local expenditures fulfill the ALHOA contribution. Examples include local dollars contributed to housing assistance, development or rehabilitation efforts, the costs of local housing inspection and code enforcements, or local property taxes to support a local or county HRA. 2010 Metropolitan Council Affordable Housing Survey You may need to return to Page 1 to submit this survey. 7 Guidelines for Priority Funding for Housing Performance Inside Front Cover Metropolitan Council Members Saundra Spigner, District 1 Todd Paulson, District 2 Mary Hill Smith, District 3 Julius C. Smith, District 4 Phil Riveness, District 5 Vacant, District 6 George Garnett, District 7 Carol A. Kummer, District 8 Peter Bell, Chair Natalie Haas Steffen, District 9 Jim Nelson, District 10 Roger Williams, District 11 Marc Hugunin, District 12 Daniel Galles, District 13 Lee Pao Xiong, District 14 Tom Egan, District 15 John Conzemius, District 16 The mission of the Metropolitan Council is to improve regional competitiveness in the global. economy so the Minneapolis -Saint Paul metropolitan region is one of the best places to live, work, raise a family and do business. The Metropolitan Council is the regional planning organization for the seven - county Twin Cities area. The Council advocates Smart Growth for vital communities and a competitive region. It runs the regional bus system, collects and treats wastewater, manages regional water resources, plans regional parks and administers funds that provide housing opportunities for low- and moderate - income individuals and families. The Council is appointed by and serves at the pleasure of the Minnesota Governor. The graphic preparation and printing of this publication cost $162.00 for a total of 300 copies. Publication # 78- 03-006 Printed on recycled paper with at least 20% post - consumer waste. On request, this publication will be made available in alternative formats to people with disabilities. Call the Metropolitan Council Data Center at 651602-1140 or TTY 651291 -0904. General phone Regional Data Center TTY Metro Info Line E -mail Internet site 651602-1000 651602-1140 651291-0904 651602-1888 data.center@metc.state.mn.us www.metrocouncii.org 2 Introduction The Metropolitan Council's Regional Blueprint includes policy that supports, encourages and promotes the broadened opportunity for affordable and life -cycle housing throughout the region. As one of the actions it will take to support such housing opportunities, the Blueprint says the Council will "give priority for regional infrastructure investments or expenditures of public dollars to communities that have implemented plans to provide their share of the region's low- and moderate - income and life -cycle housing opportunities." The following criteria and their relative weight will be used to annually determine a score — 0 to 100 points — and rank for cities and counties in the region to be used in the evaluation and prioritization of applications for funding by the Council. County scores will be used in the evaluation of county applications for funding; city scores will be used for city applications. Joint applications for discretionary funding will be weighted pursuant to the applicable combination of counties, cities, or both counties and cities. Examples of current funding decisions that will be affected include but not be limited to those for community development — the LCA Fund and Smart Growth initiatives, transportation — TEA -21, the environment — MetroEnvironment Partnership grants, and other investments and programs such as those for parks and open space. The amount of emphasis or weight given to the housing performance score or rank in the evaluation of applications for various funding programs will be at the discretion of the Metropolitan Council at the time it solicits applications for any of these discretionary funding activities. Any changes to the performance criteria themselves will be made only after the Council follows its adopted policy and practices for changing policy documents. Affordability and Diversification 0 to 8 points 1. Municipalities are ranked according to the percent of their owner - occupied housing (homesteads) with an assessed valuation equal to or lower than an amount affordable to households at 80 percent of area median income, and their total number of mobile homes. 0 to 8 points 2. Municipalities are ranked according to the percent of their total housing stock that is comprised of rental units affordable to households of low - and moderate - income (50 percent of area median income or less). This includes all federally subsidized rental units — public housing, Section 8 housing, units subsidized by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, units developed with the use of low- income housing tax credits, units developed with the assistance of MHFA, the LCA Fund or the assistance of a local fiscal tool or housing finance initiative. 0 to 8 points 3. Municipalities are ranked according to the percent of their housing stock that is comprised of units that are not single family detached units developed in the typical detached housing site plan approach. These units may include twinhomes, quads, apartments, townhomes, condominiums, detached townhomes, mobile homes, and units developed with a zero -lot line. 0 to 10 points 4. Municipalities are ranked according to the percent of net units added to their housing stock that are affordable — both ownership and rental since the Council began monitoring in 1996. These `hew" units may include units that have been "preserved" as affordable for a definitive period of time because of public or private re- investment to retain their affordability. ("Net units" means that affordable habitable units, not including units on land with a property tax classification of 4C, removed as the result of a city initiative will be subtracted from the total new affordable units.) 0 to 3 points 5. Housing for special needs Municipalities are awarded up to three points for the following types of special housing within their jurisdiction: • Housing for which federal, state, county or local funds or those of a ' non -profit organization have been used to purchase and operate residential units or provide licensed housing that is not for the purposes of incarceration, but as a transitional placement of adult offenders or adjudicated delinquents • A publicly subsidized or non -profit group home licensed by the Department of Health or Department of Human Services which provides temporary or permanent housing for the physically handicapped, mentally ill, developmentally disabled or chemically dependent • A shelter which is publicly subsidized and/or operated by a non - profit group to provide temporary housing for homeless persons and families, battered women or those not otherwise able to secure private housing • Housing for individuals and families who are homeless, but with a transitional stay of six to 24 months, and the assistance of advocates, can work towards housing stability and self - sufficiency to obtain permanent housing. Each instance of such housing is worth 1 point. Local Initiatives to Faeiiitate Affordable Workforce Housing Development or Preservation 0 to 15 points 6. Fiscal Tools and Initiatives The municipality has in place adopted local policy in its comprehensive plan or local housing plan that allows and encourages the use of a local fiscal tool or initiative and has used such a local fiscal tool to assist affordable workforce or life -cycle housing development or preservation. Examples of such fiscal tools include but are not limited to the following: • Tax increment financing • Housing revenue bonds • General obligation bonds • A local property tax levy • Local tax abatement • Local fee waivers or reductions • Credit enhancements • Taxable revenue bonds • Land write -down or sale Collaboration and participation with a community land trust or other non - profit organization to preserve long -term affordability The use of federal or state dollars is only applicable if such dollars may be used for activities other than the development or preservation of affordable and life -cycle housing but the municipality has chosen by policy to use them for affordable housing development or preservation. (i.e., CDBG dollars used for housing development or preservation) Each local fiscal tool or initiative is worth 3 points. 0 to 15 points 7. Initiatives regarding local regulation and development requirements The municipality has in the previous two calendar years allowed the reduction, adjustment or elimination of a local official control, or development or local code requirement as a cost avoidance or reduction measure in order to facilitate the development or preservation of affordable workforce or life -cycle housing, OR has in place in its policies and official controls a commitment to make such reductions, adjustments or eliminations of requirements when they are requested by a developer in order to facilitate the development or preservation of affordable or life- fd cycle housing, or since 1996, has taken the initiative to revise its land use regulation and official controls to such a degree that these revisions can be shown to be permitting greater density and more frequent opportunity for reduced development costs than existed before 1996. Examples of these initiatives in the use of official controls include but are not limited to the following: • The use of a density bonus system, inclusionary housing requirements or some other innovative zoning approach • The use of variances, rezoning, special use or conditional permits or similar variations from the standards set forth in the community's zoning ordinance for the purpose of facilitating a specific affordable housing development. • A local initiative undertaken to revise local design requirements for public improvement that may reduce the cost of public services to residential properties. • Modifications in public services standards or requirements that might include streets, curbs, gutter, sewer and water hookups, street lighting and other required public improvements in order to reduce development costs to increase affordability in a new residential development. • A reduction of such standards as the required street right -of -way, or surfacing width or depth design for residential street, or the size of sewer or water service lines to new housing. Each local initiative is worth 3 points. No more than 6 points may be applicable to any one affordable or life -cycle housing development or preservation activity aided by these local regulative measures. 0 to 15 points 8. Initiatives regarding housing preservation and rehabilitation The municipality has in place and has in the previous two calendar years used and promoted locally - initiated or administered (city or county) housing preservation, home improvement and/or rehabilitation programs, or other tools available to its residents to keep their housing stock in sound condition. Examples of these initiatives include but are not limited to the following: • A housing maintenance code and enforcement program for rental housing • A housing maintenance code and enforcement program for owner- occupied housing • A housing rehabilitation loan or grant program for rental housing • A housing rehabilitation loan or grant program for owner - occupied housing • . A home improvement loan or grant program • A home improvement resource center • A local tool - sharing center or program Each local initiative is worth 3 points. 9. Density of residential development The average net density of new (or re -use) sewered housing for which a building permit was issued in the municipality in the two previous calendar years multiplied by the total number of such units in those two years are compared among all communities. Sewered communities are ranked highest to lowest, unsewered communities are ranked lowest to highest. Points will only be given to sewered communities with an overall density of three units per acre or greater and only to unsewered communities for which the 1998 local comprehensive plan update has been put into effect. Sewered Communities 1 to 6 points a. The average net density for attached housing units, i.e., units per acre multiplied by the number of such units permitted in the last two calendar years. 1 to 6 points b. The average net density for detached housing units (including detached townhomes and manufactured homes), i.e., units per acre multiplied by the number of such units permitted in the last two calendar years. Unsewered Communities - 1 to 12 points The average net density of residential development multiplied by the number of all units permitted in the last two calendar years 0 or 6 points 10. In the previous two calendar years, the municipality has acquired land to be held specifically for the development of affordable or senior housing (exclusively 55 +), or has approved (permits may be drawn at any time) the development or local financial participation in a proposed development of new affordable or senior (exclusively 55 +) housing, or the involvement of the municipality in the preservation and reinvestment in such housing — ownership or rental — which has not as yet been undertaken for reasons beyond the municipality's control. Points will be awarded according to the number of units involved in the proposal as follows: 2 points — less than 20 units or land acquisition for future housing 4 points — 20 to 39 units 6 points — 40 or more units 9 9) Q it Metropolitan Council Livable Communities Program Investments in community vitality Thriving job centers stand on once - polluted land. Workers like teachers, police officers and health care aides can find affordable housing in the communities where they work. Residents can shop, get on a bus to go to work, and enjoy a local park all within walking distance of their front door. Programs help reach local, regional goals The Council establishes criteria for evaluating proposals and makes grant awards in four programs: Tax Base Revitalization (TBRA) - Clean up brown - fields for redevelopment, job creation and affordable housing in areas already served by transit. U) Q The LCA provides funding for communities to invest in local economic revitalization, afford- able housing initiatives, and development or redevelopment that connects different land uses and has good access to transportation. Voluntary program, based on incentives The LCA reflects the Legis- lature's preference for a voluntary, incentive -based approach to help communities grow and redevelop, and to address the region's affordable and lifecycle housing needs. connected development patterns linking housing, jobs and services. • Local Housing Incentives (LHIA) - Produce and preserve affordable housing choices for households with low to moderate incomes. Land Acquisition for Affordable New Develop- ment (LAAND) uses LCDA funds to provide communi- ties with no- interest loans to help address affordable housing needs. This program is administered in partner- ship with Minnesota Housing. To compete for LCA funding, communities must negotiate long -term affordable and life - cycle housing goals with the Council, and develop an action plan to accomplish these goals. Participating communities (105 communities in 2009) are then eligible to compete for funding from all three LCA accounts. The LCA's emphasis is on cooperation and incentives to achieve regional and local goals. Local communities are well positioned to make deci- sions about how their cities and towns will grow and develop, but the LCA recog- nizes it will take partnerships and shared resources to move from community plans to "on- the- ground" results. Investments reap impressive results From 1996 through 2009, the Council awarded 578 grants totaling more than $198 million in Livable Commu- nities funds. Fifty -two awards have been relinquished in full or in the majority, for a net of 526 grants totaling $175.7 million. (The net expected outcomes of LCA grants have been adjusted to reflect projects that did not moved forward.) The grants have Metropolitan Council • 390 Robert St. N. • Saint Paul MN 55101 • Website: www.metrocouncil.org Phone: 651- 602 -1000 • TTY: 651- 291 -0904 • Data Center: 651- 602 -1140 • E -mail: data.center @metc.state.mn.us These opportunities are supported by the Livable • Livable Communities Communities Act (LCA), Demonstration (LCDA) - Support development adopted by the Minnesota and redevelopment that demon- V Legislature in 1995 and strates efficient and cost - sadministered by the effective use of land and LL Metropolitan Council. infrastructure, and achieves U) Q The LCA provides funding for communities to invest in local economic revitalization, afford- able housing initiatives, and development or redevelopment that connects different land uses and has good access to transportation. Voluntary program, based on incentives The LCA reflects the Legis- lature's preference for a voluntary, incentive -based approach to help communities grow and redevelop, and to address the region's affordable and lifecycle housing needs. connected development patterns linking housing, jobs and services. • Local Housing Incentives (LHIA) - Produce and preserve affordable housing choices for households with low to moderate incomes. Land Acquisition for Affordable New Develop- ment (LAAND) uses LCDA funds to provide communi- ties with no- interest loans to help address affordable housing needs. This program is administered in partner- ship with Minnesota Housing. To compete for LCA funding, communities must negotiate long -term affordable and life - cycle housing goals with the Council, and develop an action plan to accomplish these goals. Participating communities (105 communities in 2009) are then eligible to compete for funding from all three LCA accounts. The LCA's emphasis is on cooperation and incentives to achieve regional and local goals. Local communities are well positioned to make deci- sions about how their cities and towns will grow and develop, but the LCA recog- nizes it will take partnerships and shared resources to move from community plans to "on- the- ground" results. Investments reap impressive results From 1996 through 2009, the Council awarded 578 grants totaling more than $198 million in Livable Commu- nities funds. Fifty -two awards have been relinquished in full or in the majority, for a net of 526 grants totaling $175.7 million. (The net expected outcomes of LCA grants have been adjusted to reflect projects that did not moved forward.) The grants have Metropolitan Council • 390 Robert St. N. • Saint Paul MN 55101 • Website: www.metrocouncil.org Phone: 651- 602 -1000 • TTY: 651- 291 -0904 • Data Center: 651- 602 -1140 • E -mail: data.center @metc.state.mn.us U y a H a LL 0 a LL leveraged billions of dollars in private and other public investments. Following is a summary of grants made and expected results: 265 pollution cleanup grants totaling over $77.7 million were made to 40 cities and counties. With 90% of the awards moving forward toward completion, the result is a net of 238 TBRA grants totaling $69.3 million. The completed projects will produce a $65.2 million increase in net tax capacity, and more than 31,000 new and retained jobs. • 170 LCDA grants totaling over $90 million were made to development and redevel- opment projects that link housing, jobs, and services, and maximize efficient infrastructure in 54 older and developing cities. Of these grants, 91% moved forward towards completion, for a net of 155 grants totaling $91.9 million. 125 grants were made to 52 cities were to provide afford- able housing opportunities, with 92% moving forward to completion. These net awards have provided more than 700 rehabilitated affordable rental units; nearly 1,900 new affordable rental units; more than and more than 800 affordable new and rehabilitated ownership units. Other benefits of LCA funds are restored natural resources, improved transportation options, new community amenities and thriving new neighborhoods. Advisory Committee helps select projects The Livable Communities Advisory Committee reviews and recommends funding awards to the Council for the Livable Communities Demon- stration Account. The committee reviews complex development and redevelop- ment proposals against the program's criteria for connected development patterns that link housing, jobs and services. The committee's 13 members represent and have expertise in development as it relates to local government planning, economic or community development; public and private finance; new develop- ment and redevelopment; transportation; environment; and site design. Cooperative efforts reduce `red tape' Communities applying for LHIA funding or other public affordable housing funds to produce affordable multi- family rental housing in the region, need fill out only one application through Minnesota Housing. A group of represen- tatives from the Council, the Family Housing Fund and Minnesota Housing reviews the applications and make grants from a variety of public funding sources. TBRA funding is coordinated with complementary programs at the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development, Hennepin County and Ramsey County. For more information • Livable Communities program information: http://www.metrocouncil. org /seivices/livcomm.htm • Frequently asked questions about LCA (pdO. htW:: // www.metrocouncil.orp-/ services/livcomm /LCA GeneralFAO.pdf • Related fact sheet about Affordable Housing: http: //www. metrocouncil. org /about/facts /Affordable Housin Fag_cts:pdf Pub. 14- 10-036 July 2010 Metropolitan Council • 390 Robert St. N. • Saint Paul MN 55101 • Website: www.metrocouncii.org Phone: 651- 602 -1000 • TTY: 651- 291 -0904 • Data Center: 651- 602 -1140 • E -mail: data.center @metc.state.mn.us Livable Communities Act (LCA) Locally Adopted Affordable and Lifecycle Unit Housing Goals 2011 -2020 Goals adopted as of 10/29/2010; newly adopted goals will be updated weekly through the public hearing date of 11/15/2010 Affordable Lifecycle Affordable Lifecycle Municipality Rance Ranoe Municopali Ranae RanQe Afton Minnetonka 246 378 375 800 Anoka 62 96 95 465 Minnetonka Beach Apple Valley 915 1307 1305 3700 Mound 44 68 65 250 Arden Hills 187 288 285 800 Mounds View 53 81 80 200 Belle Plalne New Brighton 89 137 135 400 Blaine 1212 1865 1865 3970 New Germany 7 11 10 200 Bloomington 625 961 960 2300 New Hope 138 213 210 500 Brooklyn Center 106 163 160 400 Newport 44 68 65 280 Brooklyn Park North St. Paul 75 115 115 300 Burnsville 516 737 735 1800 Norwood Young 126 194 190 425 Carver 581 894 890 4360 America Centerville 111 170 170 270 Oak Grove Oakdale 120 184 180 520 Champlin 116 179 175 555 Chaska 718 1105 1105 1718 Orono Osseo 15 23 20 100 Cologne 137 211 210 1020 Plymouth 679 1045 1045 1958 Columbia Heights 150 231 231 600 Prior Lake 758 1166 1165 3000 Coon Rapids 130 200 200 900 Ramsey 434 669 665 2430 Cottage Grove Richfield 497 765 765 1500 Crystal 57 87 87 200 Robbinsdale 86 133 133 300 Dayton 806 1240 1240 3065 Rogers 248 382 380 2150 Eagan 619 884 880 2085 Rosemount 700 1000 1000 2678 East Bethel 118 181 180 1825 Roseville 131 201 200 500 Eden Prairie 1198 1843 1840 3500 Saint Paul 2625 2625 2625 7000 Edina 138 212 210 400 Savage 804 1237 1235 2900 Elko New Market Shoreview 70 107 105 300 Excelsior 5 7 5 20 Falcon Heights 14 21 20 50 South St. Paul 73 104 100 300 St. Anthony 203 312 310 800 Farmington 345 492 490 1720 Forest Lake 358 551 550 1500 St. Bonifacius 2 2 2 4 St. Francis 47 74 70 1200 Fridley 75 116 116 300 St. Louis Park 326 501 500 1000 Golden Valley 68 104 100 200 St. Paul Park 285 438 435 1670 Hamburg 4 6 5 15 Stillwater 151 233 230 650 Hastings 216 241 240 2200 Hilltop 28 43 40 100 Sunfish Lake Vadnais Heights 111 170 170 500 Hopkins 93 143 140 300 Victoria 634 975 975 3200 Hugo 556 855 855 1305 Inver Grove Heights 610 871 870 2652 Waconia 459 706 705 3500 Jordan 74 114 110 150 Watertown 39 60 60 650 Lake St. Croix Beach 1 1 1 1 Wayzata West St. Paul 73 104 100 300 Lakeland 6 6 10 10 Lakeville 1582 2260 2260 8200 White Bear Lake 42 65 65 200 White Bear Landfall Township Lauderdale 23 35 35 90 Willernie Lexington Woodbury 1337 2057 2055 3125 Lino Lakes 364 560 560 1860 Long Lake Loretto 2 3 3 10 Mahtomedi 18 27 25 100 Maple Grove 1147 1764 1760 3605 Maple Plain 12 19 15 90 Maplewood 252 388 385 1050 Mayer 113 174 170 925 Medina 329 506 505 1480 Mendota Heights 28 43 40 100 Minneapolis 4200 4200 9300 9300 Goals adopted as of 10/29/2010; newly adopted goals will be updated weekly through the public hearing date of 11/15/2010 r MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Heritage Preservation Board Tuesday, November 9, 2010, 7:00 PM Edina Community Room 4801 50th Street West MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Joel Stegner, Chris Rofidal, Jean Rehkamp Larson, Bob Schwartzbauer, Arlene Forrest, Claudia Carr, Colleen Curran, Katherine McLellan, MEMBERS ABSENT: Ross Davis, and Lauren Thorson STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner OTHERS PRESENT: Robert Vogel, Heritage Preservation Consultant APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: October 12, 2010 Member Rofidal moved approval of the minutes from the October 12, 2010 meeting. Member Curran seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. II. COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT: Certificates of Appropriateness (COA) A. H -10 -04 4501 Casco Avenue — Remove a detached garage and build an addition with an attached garage Continued until the December 14th HPB meeting at the request of the applicant. B. H -10 -06 4901 Sunnyside Road — Demolish existing home and construct a new home Staff Report Planner Repya explained that the subject property is located on the south side of the 4900 block of Sunnyside Road, abutting Minnehaha Creek. The existing home is a Ranch style with a walk -out basement constructed in 1948. A 2 -stall front loading attached garage is located on the east side of the home. The COA request involves demolishing the existing home with the intention of building a new home with attached garage that meets the district's plan of treatment criteria. The existing home is not classified as an historic resource since it was constructed after the District's period of significance (1924 — 1944), thus its demolition is not an issue; however the construction of a replacement home is subject to the HPB review and approval. The proposed replacement home is a 2 story, with an attached 2 -car garage accessed from a new driveway on the west side of the property. The applicant has not identified the Minutes Heritage Preservation Board November 9, 2010 home as a specific historic architectural style, however demonstrated attention to detail by incorporating design elements found on historic homes in the Country Club District and particularly along Sunnyside Road. The proposed height of the home at the peak is 29'6 ", consistent with the heights of the adjacent homes which measure 28'10" to the east and 29'6" to the west. A rendering of the streetscape was been provided depicting the proposed home and the two adjacent homes. The plans also demonstrated side yard setbacks of 10' to the east, and 5' to the west. The exterior materials proposed for the home include Hardi -board or cedar shakes on the exterior walls; trim bands; fascia and soffit, cedar brackets and gable finials; stone wing walls and trim; and asphalt or cedar shingles. Ms Repya pointed out that the proponent has contacted neighboring residents, and City notices were mailed to all property owners from 4600 – 4902 Sunnyside Road. Several neighbors came into the city offices to review the plans, and all were pleased with what they saw. Consultant Robert Vogel reviewed the subject plans and observed that the new home would meet the design review guidelines for new construction in the district plan of treatment. Mr. Vogel pointed out this part of the Country Club District encompasses a wide variety of house types and styles — historically, the western portion of Sunnyside Road has always been the most architecturally eclectic sub - neighborhood in the district —and the design of the proposed new house appears to be sensitive to the streetscape, which is distinguishable from the rest of the district by the size, scale, orientation and massing of the houses. Most importantly, the design of the new house is a mix of traditional and contemporary elements, but it does not create an earlier appearance, meaning, it is not a modern house pretending to be an old house. Mr. Vogel recommended that the applicant provide the HPB with an architectural recordation of the existing home prior to demolition. The documentation (consisting of digital photographs, line drawings of the floor plan and principal elevation, and a brief written description of the house and its known history) would provide the city with a body of information that could be useful for research purposes and in educating the public about the physical history of the district. Planner Repya reminded the Board that the review process for the replacement of a non - historic resource home in the Country Club District entails a 2 -step process. The plans currently under consideration fulfill the first step. Ms. Repya concluded that she recommended the HPB provide the applicant with feedback on the proposed plans, identifying any desired changes. The applicant will then take into consideration the information received when drafting final plans to be presented for approval at the December 14, 2010 HPB meeting. a Minutes Heritage Preservation Board November 9, 2010 ADDlicant Comments Andy Porter, 4010 Grimes Avenue, Refined LLC explained that his company purchased the subject home from the estate of a long time resident. The plans under consideration are not for speculation, but specific to the wishes of a buyer, Mr. Jason Conway. Mr. Porter shared the challenges he encountered when designing a new home on the property, stressing that he believes that the proposed home is compatible with its surroundings and will be an asset to the neighborhood. Responding to questions regarding the home's exterior materials, Mr. Porter stated that he intends to bring a material board to the December meeting, however they are proposing cedar shakes for the exterior cladding with stone accents not unlike that used for City Hall; Hardi board for the soffit/fascia and accents; and they would like the ability to choose between asphalt shingles or cedar shakes depending on the ultimate budget. He added that the color scheme will be a bluish grey with white trim. A brief discussion ensued between the Board and Mr. Porter in which he clarified details of the design. Neighborhood Comments Arthur Brown, 4908 Sunnyside Road shared reflections of the Leonard Nelson the previous owner of the subject property. Board Member Comments Member Rehkamp Larson stated that she thought the proposed plan was great, with the mass and scale compatible with the surrounding homes. Member Forrest shared that she too liked the plan and stated that she would be in favor of allowing the option of either a cedar shake or asphalt shingle roof. The general consensus of the Board agreed with Ms. Forrest. Chair Stegner summarized the reflections shared by the Board, noting that no changes to the proposed plan had been recommended. Mr. Stegner commended Mr. Porter for the attention to detail with the proposed plan and stated that the Board looked forward to reviewing the final proposal at the December meeting. No formal action was taken. III. MORNINGSIDE BUNGALOW STUDY: Establish goals and timeline Planner Repya explained that now that the Morningside Bungalow Study has been completed, the HPB needs to prepare the information for a presentation to the Morningside neighborhood and ultimately for placement on the City's website. Recognizing that the board found the study to be full of valuable information, but heavy on text and in need of more photos and graphics, Ms. Repya shared information she found on the City of Chicago's bungalow districts. Board members agreed that the 3 Minutes Heritage Preservation Board November 9, 2010 Morningside bungalow information could be presented in much the same format as Chicago's. A general discussion ensued among the Board regarding the elements they would like to see in the presentation. Member Curran offered to write an executive summary of the study, and Member Carr volunteered to organize the study into a format similar to that used by Chicago. Planner Repya agreed to work with Members Curran and Carr, providing any information or research they may need. Discussion ensued regarding the best time to present the information to the neighborhood. It was agreed that sometime after January 1St would probably work best for the public. Planner Repya stated that she would contact Helen Burke, the Morningside resident that accompanied the HPB on the tour last summer who has expressed an interest in helping coordinate the neighborhood presentation. Board members agreed that it would be most helpful to have a Morningside representative included in planning the presentation. Discussing the landmark designation of bungalows in Morningside, several board members wondered how many properties could be designated at time - asking what would happen if there was a rush of applications? Consultant Vogel assured the Board that the designations of the Morningside bungalows would be on a first come first served basis, with the ability of designating 3 or 4 properties per year. Mr. Vogel added that such a timeline is typical for communities with historic landmark programs. Concern was raised as to how the additional work of designating properties in Morningside would fit into the budget established for heritage preservation. Mr. Vogel pointed out that there are small Legacy Grant funds provided by the State Historic Preservation Office for CLG cities such as Edina. These smaller grants are awarded on a monthly basis with no community match required. Board members agreed those funds would be helpful to meeting their designation goals. Following a brief discussion, board members agreed that they looked forward to continuing the work of preparing the Morningside bungalow study presentation at the December meeting. No formal action was taken. IV. COMMUNITY COMMENT: None V. 2010 GOALS & OBJECTIVES: Review Accomplishments Board members reviewed the goals and objectives targeted for 2010 to determine what tasks needed to be completed, or carried over to 2011. Of the fifteen goals identified, it was determined the following six goals remain to be completed: 1. Apply for Legacy Grant funds for accessibility improvements to the Cahill School and Grange Hall; continue in 2011 i Minutes Heritage Preservation Board November 9, 2010 2. Explore potential Edina civic organization support for heritage preservation; continue in 2011 3. Provide walking tours of the Country Club District, Morningside neighborhood, and the city at large on the website; work ongoing — continue in 2011 4. Document city and school district properties on Eden Avenue; explore completing in 2010 5. Nominate at least one property for heritage landmark designation; begin notification of the process and benefits to at least 2 identified property owners. Discussion ensued regarding the desire to begin process of designating at least two single family homes which have been identified as eligible since the 1980 property survey of the city. Robert Vogel explained that the nomination information has been prepared for the Leeskov house at 4410 Curve Avenue and the Skone House at 4311 Eton Place. The board agreed that it would make sense to begin with those homes. Planner Repya agreed to compile the history of those properties and submit that information to the homeowners with the offer to pursue landmark designations. Continuing the discussion on designating landmark properties, the board also expressed an interest in pursuing the designation of the Wooddale bridge crossing Minnehaha Creek at Wooddale Avenue, just south of W. 50th Street. Consultant Vogel explained that the last word on this potential designation was from the City Engineer, Wayne Houle who was in the process of evaluating the structure. Planner Repya agreed to contact Mr. Houle regarding the potential for designating the bridge. Chair Stegner summarized that over all, the Board has done a good job of tackling the work plan for 2010. To continue the evaluation, he asked Ms. Repya to ensure that the 2010 - 2011 work plan be part of the agenda for the December meeting. No formal action was taken. VI. OTHER BUSINESS: 1. League of Women Voters Reception for New City Manager, Scott Neal Member Rofidal reminded the Board that the League of Women Voters of Edina is hosting a reception to on Monday, November 15th from 6:00 — 8:00 p.m. at Edina City Hall, to introduce Scott Neal, the new City Manager. He pointed out that the public invited, and he encouraged his fellow board members to attend. VII. CORRESPONDENCE: None VIII. NEXT MEETING DATE: December 14, 2010 IX. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 9:10 PM Respectfully submitted, Joyce Repya c) Minutes of the Edina Park Board November 9, 2010 Edina City Hall, Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Todd Fronek, Dan Peterson, Rob Presthus, Ellen Jones, Jennifer Kenney, Felix Pronove, Randy Meyer, Joseph Hulbert, Keeya Steel, Louise Segreto MEMBERS ABSENT: Bill Lough, Austin Durnmer STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton, Scott Neal, Todd Anderson I. INTRODUCTION OF NEW CITY MANAGER SCOTT NEAL Scott Neal, new City Manager, informed the Park Board a little bit about himself. He indicated that he is originally from Iowa and went to school at Iowa State .University. He stated that he got his start in city management in a small town called Norris, Tennessee where he stayed for two years. After that he went to Mount Pleasant, IA for six years, Northfield, MN for six years and then on to Eden Prairie for eight.years. He noted that he had a wonderful experience in Eden Prairie but is very happy to join the City of Edina and be the new City Manager. Mr. Neal pointed out that he has had a chance to work with Park and Recreation organizations of all shapes and sizes and has had the chance on two occasions to establish park and recreation departments. He stated that he knows how important that function is and those amenities are in the community, especially in a community like Edina, therefore he will do his best to serve the Park Board. II. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES Dan Peterson MOVED TO APPROVE THE OCTOBER 12, 2010 PARK BOARD MINUTES. Louise Segreto SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. III. NEW BUSINESS A. Braemar. Golf Course Clubhouse Consultant — Joseph Hulbert - Mr. Hulbert informed the Park Board that he thinks it's safe.to say that Braemar.Golf Course is the largest enterprise facility in Edina. It's a great course, beautiful setting and awesome location and thinks everyone in Edina would agree that we. are lucky to have it. He noted, however, that there are some large capital improvements needed such as the driving range reconfiguration, the golf dome building needs, the Clunie nine and the 20 year -old course could use some` design attention as well as the clubhouse could use some updates. Mr. Hulbert indicated that the challenge is with the current economy Braemar isn't alone in that it's struggling and losing money, however, now with Mr. Todd Anderson as the new General Manager at Braemar he thinks it would be a good time to make an investment and help Mr. Anderson succeed. He noted that they need to find ways to bring Braemar into the black, to reinvigorate it, re- invent it and the therefore he would like the Park Board to consider a few recommendations. Mr. Hulbert indicated that the first thing he would like for the Park Board to consider is to hire a third party consultant for advice and suggestions regarding Braemar Golf Course. He noted that he did a little research and there are companies that will come in, study, analyze and give independent ideas and advice regarding the following: • • • e e • • e e e • e e • • • e • e • • e • Condition of the facility Functionality of the facility Aesthetics Revenue potential Evaluate the flow of the clubhouse Utilization of space Identify operating efficiencies Layout and design of the golf.course Storage facilities Practice facilities Landscaping Customer` service Cash handling procedures Tournament .procedures , Special outings Pace of play Review starters and marshals Employee compensation Staff training Staff supervision Fees Accounting and bookkeeping Organizational structure Staffing and cost of labor Cost of golf operations Point of sale systems Yield analysis , Tee time reservation systems Appropriateness and functionality of the current technology Food and beverage operations Merchandising & retail operations Membership and annual passes Financial performance over the past.three years &trend analysis compared to reviews of performance with comparable facilities Areas where costs could be reduced without affecting performance Areas where costs have been reduced excessively to the detriment of performance Golf course maintenance Current condition of the golf course its practices Capital improvements Marketing & identifying target markets 2 IS • Overall marketing strategy • Utilization of media including website and e-mail programs • Promotions and specials • Turf conditions (possibly use an agronomist) Mr. Hulbert pointed out,that some of these matters have been discussed periodically at Braemar. Mr. Hulbert suggested that maybe they should form some sort of a citizen's resource group or panel to assist and maybe help steer ideas in improvement and change at Braemar. He commented that, he thinks there is a lot that they can look at with improving at Braemar and maybe by bringing in an outside set of eyeballs they will offer fresh ideas and perspective. Ms. Segreto commented that she thinks they need a,plan to keep Braemar current because it is showing signs of being in the past especially with respect to the food service. She asked Mr. Hulbert what it would cost to hire a specialized consultant to prepare a study of all the items he listed. Mr. Hulbert replied that the company he contacted informed him that,to do a comprehensive survey or an analysis like this it would cost approximately $15,000. He pointed out 'that on the CIP for next year they are going to spend $100,000 on an environmental inventory assessment and added that Braemar has a significant potential to give''them a return on the investment. Ms. Segreto asked Mr. Anderson if there are any public courses where a private restaurateur will.come into the public course and run the food service and finance the capital improvements. Mr. Anderson replied that he knows Edinburgh uses Lancer Catering to run their Girvan Grill and that Prestwich has an Axel's restaurant. Ms. Segreto commented that she thinks. it would be interesting to explore a private /public partnership. Mr. Anderson pointed out that one of their big limitations, is space and added that when caterers come in to do events they'do not have a full kitchen; they are very tight on space. He stated'that he knows one of Mr. Hulbert's concerns was being able to have bottled beer and pop but the problem is there is no place to put, it and to change their current situation it would cost a significant'amount of money. Ms. Segreto indicated that she has spent a lot of time at Braemar cross country skiing and snowshoeing and often thought flow great it would be if the city rented out skis or snowshoes. She noted that maybe this is something that could even be run by a,.private party but it could be another revenue source for the city. Mr. Anderson replied he would be happy to look into that; however, in their past experience in working with Edina High School they had a snowmobile'with a groomer. He stated that once they start promoting Braemar as a cross country ski area they need to keep it groomed all of the time so there is a cost involved so they would need to consider. Mr. Presthus asked what the age limit is for the youth at Braemar. Mr. Anderson replied currently it's age 12 on the regulation. courses and age 10 on the executive courses and stated they will be working on that over the winter and it will be going down. -Mr. Presthus commented that he thinks that's an area where they could definitely add more play. He added that maybe they can even incorporate other things with that such as a youth training course where they would need'-to go through a certification process that includes golf rules, etc. Ms. Kenney noted that she agrees with Mr. Presthus. This past summer she brought her 7 year -old over to Hiawatha where they had a good park and recreation golf program for kids starting at age 7. Mr. Keprios stated that just to clarify part of what's included in his Staff Report is a copy of an e -mail exchange between Mr. Hulbert, Mr. Anderson and himself of a meeting the three of them had earlier at Braemar at Mr. Hulbert's request. He pointed out that Mr. Hulbert came up with a list of 17 different valid concerns; however, the focus for this meeting is Mr. Hulbert's proposal to come forward with a consultant to review the items that have been laid out. Mr. Hulbert indicated that he thinks in this environment they have to try to have just incremental changes to try to improve the experience at Braemar. He noted they can do things that don't cost much of anything to improve the user experience. Mr. Hulbert commented that there is a captive audience there but feels sometimes they leave because they don't want to stay at the clubhouse because it feels outdated and maybe they could make it more up -to -date with some modest improvements. Mr. Hulbert stated that, hopefully five years from now, they will be in a better environment with some of the debt service paid off. He added that ideally at some point it would be nice to have a modern clubhouse that attracts a user to not just play golf but to bring the family to have a burger and maybe watch the Twin's game and make it a community gathering space rather than just a golf clubhouse. He pointed out that he thinks if they were to bring in another set of eyeballs maybe they could find a way to make the current floor plan flow better and maybe transition some space into an area where they could store soda, beer and wine. Mr. Hulbert stated that he doesn't have all the ideas or all of the solutions; he has-just been gathering all of the comments that he has heard from people that use Braemar. Mr. Hulbert stated that the main point is to try to direct some resources to Braemar to help Mr. Anderson and Braemar succeed. Mr. Anderson responded that's great and it's the direction he would like to go; however, there are costs associated with almost everything on the list and right now financially their hands are tied and that's a big part of the equation. He pointed out that right now his goal is to get the course in the best condition he can as far as being playing and putting dollars toward marketing. Mr. Anderson explained that they are currently down a couple of people and he would like to take those salaries and put it towards maintaining and improving what they have. He would love to make improvements down the road but, for now, their hands are tied. Mr. Fronek stated that he thinks it's great for them to have some sort of vision and asked Mr. Anderson what his vision is for Braemar in the next five to ten years. He indicated that maybe Mr. Keprios can discuss the financial constraints that Braemar is under. He stated that as a Park Board they would like to be able to give staff the tools in order to be successful and asked Mr. Anderson in an ideal world what he would like to see happen. Mr. Anderson replied that right now his plan is to improve the course conditions and playability and then promote the course. He noted that he feels they need to put more dollars into advertising so that they can draw the non - resident patron card. Mr. Anderson pointed out that right now he thinks their number one priority is to replace the building at the dome. It's going to be an expenditure of approximately $450,000 because right now the building could actually blow away on any given day. He added 4 that their customers are safe but explained that it was built in 1983 and that the dome is actually anchored to a wooden structure, which is a poor design. A new support structure is needed that would basically use the same footprint and concrete block but they would not have the dome actually attached directly to the building. He commented that they did replace the dome fabric quite a few years ago and it is wearing very well and thinks they will get at least another 15 years out of it. Mr. Anderson indicated that his second project would be the driving range. He noted it is his number one concern as far as liability and safety. He also commented that if they could increase the size and the depth they could increase the quality of the turf which is not good right now. He noted that they would be able to rotate forward and back and have a quality facility because right now they have so much play and not enough turf that he thinks they are losing business right now to facilities like Glen Lake. Mr. Anderson stated that third on his list would be to try to soften Clunie as far as the playability because of some of the hills. He commented that he's not sure if the return on investment would be there. Mr. Meyer asked how often the facility is used during the off season for other functions. Mr. Anderson replied actually quite a bit. He noted that currently the "Northwoods Boutique" is there for two weeks where they take over the banquet room. He stated that they are booked most weekends throughout the winter but that January is a slower month. He indicated that they have a lot of business meetings during the day and there are times when they are changing the room over two to three times a day because of multiple meetings. Mr. Meyer asked what the current fee structure is. Mr. Anderson replied for Edina residents on a Friday or Saturday is $900.00 and for non - residents it's $1,000 and gets scaled back from that depending on the amount of hours and what day of the week it is. Mr. Meyer indicated Mr. Anderson talked about the building next to the dome and some future upgrades and asked how are the decisions made on future upgrades and who says we're okay financially here is where we want to go. Mr. Anderson responded that regarding the building, he put it in their 2011 budget knowing that they don't have the finances but believes ultimately it will be the Park Board and City Council who will decide when they do it. Mr. Meyer indicated that for the long -term planning process he thinks it would be helpful if there is a vision for a new clubhouse and maybe we should think about it and plan for it five years out. He noted that he thinks we need to figure out what will happen to make all that work versus potentially making investments now that may affect something down the road such as knocking down a building and putting it in the wrong spot. He commented that he thinks what he is hearing is what really is the vision and how do we get there whether it's five years out or ten years out what are the investments that we need to market that will be a good investment and facility for the community. Mr. Presthus indicated that he agrees with that but right now he thinks they need to decide whether or not they want to endorse the idea of spending $15,000 to get a consulting firm in here to point them in the direction they need to go. He stated that he 5 thinks if they have a consulting firm come in that basically comes up with a ten year plan of what you want to do and helps to prioritize it makes the most sense. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that input is always a great thing and he welcomes it; however, he feels they are entering into a delicate area of whether or not it is the Park Board's function to go into this area of business and management or at what point is it policy and governance? He pointed out that the third paragraph in the business plan it references that the clubhouse does need a fresh look and we are going to look at the menu and a lot of that is more management than it is policy setting. He explained that they try to give Park Board more of the big picture stuff rather than the day to day because Mr. Anderson is there all the time. He noted they have the Braemar Golf Association, a Men's Club and a Women's League that all provide Mr. Anderson their input and that's a good thing. Mr. Keprios stated that they are hearing from the community and their customers and that's a good thing. He noted that it's too bad they didn't have this conversation when he brought the CIP to the Park Board earlier this year to approve basically a one year budget and a five year plan. He explained that this complicates it somewhat if you want to recommend spending $15,000, to further analyze what he feels the Park Board has already approved for a 5 -year vision; however, the Park Board can certainly propose this new idea to the City Council. Mr. Keprios stated that he would like John Wallin, City Finance Director, to give a quick overview of where they are financially, what is realistic to expect and where the dollars are going to come from. He noted that all of these suggestions are all great ideas and, if money were no object, we would be all over it and the business plan would look quite different. Mr. Wallin noted that there are a lot of good ideas out there but, unfortunately, the last several years have seen debt increase, the operations no longer pay off the debt that it once could. He informed the Park Board that in 2009 the golf course reduced its deficit, which was a millions dollars, by $100,000. Unfortunately, it did that with a $170,000 subsidy from the liquor fund and a one -time $100,000 subsidy out of the general fund. He pointed out that, even with the $270,000 in subsidies in 2009, the golf course only improved their position by $100,000. Mr. Wallin noted that the conundrum is that many of these things may be worthwhile; however, Braemar has an existing million dollar cash deficit and an additional 1.2 million future debt coming forward this fall. He explained that in meetings with both Moody's and Standard & Poor's, comments came up, as they have the past several years, concerning what are we going to do with the deficit at the golf course because it has become a very major issue in the rating of Edina's bonds. He noted that Standard & Poor's was silent on it but that Moody's had it as part of their rating in that they saw that we again reduced the 2009 deficit, the million dollar deficit cash balance. He added that they did not go into that they did it by $270,000 worth of subsidies. Mr. Wallin stressed that Moody's and Standard & Poor's have really focused on the deficit meaning that it would be very difficult to increase cash deficit or increase any debt relating to the golf course without catching the eye of Moody's and Standard & Poor's and pointed out that this would affect the rest of the ratings for special assessment or any other type of debt issuance. He stated again that it's going to be very difficult to do any additional capital improvements until the debt is paid off in three years and possibly even later until the cash balance decreases. He commented some of that may improve if we can start adding to that bottom line. He 11 noted that he thinks it's going to be an uphill battle for the golf course to be able to improve its position very much until that debt is paid off and possibly a couple of years past that debt being paid off. Mr. Hulbert asked if they would be able to reallocate $15,000 to $20,000 from the CIP to try to find ways to make Braemar operate more efficiently as a business. Mr. Wallin replied that the issue wouldn't be the $15,000; the issue would be recommendations for capital improvements. Mr. Hulbert noted that some capital improvement would be for simple things like adding monitors to the clubhouse or a 43" plasma TV. He also commented that the GHIN system, which Braemar is a member of, offers programming where if there is a tournament going on there are neat reporting systems that use the GHIN system and software we already have to report scores on the monitors throughout the clubhouse. He commented these are just some ways to try to add value to the experience at Braemar so that maybe it attracts more business and we can show that five years down the road we are no longer in the red but are firmly in the black and can demonstrate to City Council and to the taxpayers of Edina that it does make sense to look at building a new clubhouse in ten years. Mr. Wallin stated that $15,000 isn't going to make a difference one way or another of the financial condition of the golf course going forward, his concern is with the larger ticket items. Mr. Hulbert commented that maybe they could find a way to reallocate resources in the upcoming year in the capital improvement plan or request from City Council that they find resources for us to try to do this. He added that he thinks winter would be the best time to be looking at ideas to improve the golf course because it's the down season. Mr. Peterson asked when we say Braemar and/or the word golf we are referring to the Braemar 27 -hole course, the Braemar Executive course, the clubhouse and the Fred Richards Course to which Mr. Wallin replied that's correct. Mr. Wallin explained they may refer to it as Braemar but they account for all of what was mentioned. Mr. Peterson asked are the Braemar 27 -hole course and the Braemar 9 -hole course bonds about ready to be paid off in a couple of years. Mr. Wallin responded that the existing debt is for the Fred Richards course and over the next three years it will be 1.2 million. Mr. Peterson asked so once the Fred Richards debt is paid off things will look at lot brighter. Mr. Wallin replied that he does believe that once the Fred Richards debt is paid off hopefully the revenues from the facility will then go to pay down the million dollar cash deficit and once that happens then the possibility for new debt comes up and the possibility to be able to put money away for future projects comes up. Ms. Jones indicated that it looks like right now the golf dome is in really good shape as far as making money except for the fact that it may blow down. She asked how much revenue would they lose if they did not have the dome functioning and it did blow down. Mr. Wallin explained that when they initially purchased the dome about 20 years ago they were doing approximately $100,000 a year profit to the bottom line. He noted that right now their debt is paid off and last year they did $15,000 to $20,000 worth of profit so that has dropped, but its very weather related. Ms. Jones indicated that in looking at the difference between the proposed budget for 2011 and what was budgeted in 2010 that across the board on all revenue areas it looks very rosy in the projections. She asked how they are going to make all of the increased money. Mr. Wallin explained that the golf facility is the one who puts together the budget and they look at what they expect their number of rounds to be and all other aspects of their budget and try to figure out where they predict what the season is going to be. He noted that from there they put together the budget document with the assistance of finance so that is where the golf course staff had their estimate of where they thought the golf business would be in future years. Mr. Meyer asked how the budget at Braemar compares to some of the other facilities. Mr. Wallin replied that the pool pays for their operation and is able to put away some money in anticipation for a capital expenditure that is coming up in the next couple of years. He explained that the pool had had the money in hand to purchase a flow -rider; however, they have had to reserve their funds because by law the city is required with the bond issue at Braemar to reserve a one year's worth of debt service. Because of Braemar's negative fund balance, the pool by law had to reserve that for Braemar, which means that the Aquatic Center wasn't able to spend the money to do its capital budget even though it had the funds on hand. Mr. Meyer asked does the City Council make those decisions to which Mr. Wallin replied yes, that is correct. Mr. Wallin explained that staff makes the recommendation where the reserve should be held and the ultimate responsibility is the City Council. Ms. Steel asked how often the business plan is updated. Mr. Wallin replied that this last one was done just over three years ago and he believes they are currently working a new business plan. Ms. Steel asked would that plan take into account these ideas being presented. Mr. Wallin responded that the Communication Department heads up the business plans and will work with the golf course management to come up with what is the future of the course. Mr. Keprios indicated that if the Park Board would like to go forward with a study of some sort he would ask that the Park Board decide on specific ideas you would like the consultant to really focus on. He stated that if they are going to do a request for proposal he needs to know what the Park Board wants studied. Mr. Meyer suggested that this is something that still needs to be worked on and needs more information so they can review it prior to their next meeting. He noted that if at that time it makes sense, then they can go ahead and vote on it. He thinks they have to have a better understanding of what it is they are trying to accomplish and be clear about it or else even a consultant isn't going to know what they are trying to accomplish. Mr. Keprios stated that he agrees this is not something that staff came forward with and therefore staff is looking for some direction on what the Park Board would like for staff to do. Mr. Fronek stated that he thinks there are two prongs to this equation. First, they are talking about more of an operational investment and he's got to think there are other ways to either increase revenues and/or cut expenses by $15,000, which would pay for this consultant expenditure within a year or two. He commented that they are shifting a little to management versus policy but with new management coming in he does think it presents them with a great opportunity to look a little bit at their operations and see how they can do better. He indicated that the second component is more on the policy side. He thinks that for next year's CIP they should start to think about some of these long range planning ideas for Braemar. .It can show what it is they would like to see in five or ten years once this debt gets retired. Mr. Fronek stated that the - agrees they need to spend:a ,little more time on this and then see if they can't figure out an operational consultant -who's going to come in for $1'5,000 and be a net positive in a year or two. He noted they also should look at next year coming up with more of a long range plan whether that also involves hiring a consultant or establishing some sort of task force or. something like that. Mr. Keprios °asked Mr. Anderson vision and management wise from what is already on the business plan where does he think consulting: services would be best spent. He also asked Mr. Anderson in what areas does he think Braemar would really benefit in the short and long term where we may have some holes that might open the doors. Mr. Anderson replied that in looking at major capital improvements as far as the,clubhouse and anything else like that it is a few years out. He stressed that his personal focus has been on improving the golf course and marketing. He informed the Park Board that they actually did have a consultant out,,to look at the driving range expansion and the Clunie Course as far as softening it and he does `have that report. Mr. Anderson stated that he is on�,board with a lot of these thoughts and noted that they can address some of the issues internally and "then if they need to bring in a consultant they will know better what areas they should focus on. Mr. Keprios suggested to the Park Board that he could take the list of items Mr. Hulbert read and if any other members have their own special interests at the golf course to be considered to let him know. He stated that this will give him an opportunity to meet with Mr. Anderson and`they'will bring some recommendations back to the Park Board at the December meeting for consideration. He noted that this isn't something that's going to happen overnight, it will likely need a little more study, feedback and direction. IV. UPDATES FROM STAFF Mr. Keprios gave a power point presentation to the Park Board showing the progress we have made on the scheduled 2010 Capital Improvement Program projects. He noted they have been working on a lot of park improvement projects. Mr. Keprios showed the two hockey rinks that the extremely skilled professional Park Maintenance staff built at Walnut Ridge Park and'Pamela Park. He commented that he thinks Edina has the finest outdoor rinks in Minnesota and it is due to the skill and craftsmanship of our professional Park Maintenance personnel whom he is so proud of. He added that new light standards and energy efficient fixtures are in place and operational at Pamela Park. Mr. Keprios indicated that at Bredesen Park they spent almost $190,000 to do the bike path that is now completed and that Bituminous Roadways contractor did a wonderful job. He explained that with assistance from the Engineering Department, all of these asphalt .9 renovation projects consolidated into one bid for economies of scale and the bid was awarded to Bituminous Roadways for $384,466.05. Mr. Keprios pointed out that at Braemar Golf Course they are in year two of three phases and just spent $82,000 to do this year's part of asphalting the parking lot. He noted that the reason they can't do this all at once is because they can only go without so much parking at one time and therefore it's done in phases. Mr. Keprios indicated that they just updated and renovated the entire parking lot at Walnut Ridge and they did a wonderful job. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that at Edinborough Park they have quite a few projects which some are complete and some are still underway. He noted that they renovated deteriorated sidewalks and added better lighting for the turnaround area in front which cost over $45,000. He stated that they are currently in the process of converting the kitchen/catering area into bathrooms for $96,000 and should be completed in December. He showed the new flooring that was replaced at the amphitheater and commented that the new hardwood floor turned out beautiful. Mr. Keprios indicated that the Braemar West Arena Project has just been completed and they did a phenomenal job. He noted that this project includes new dehumidification systems in the East and West Arenas. The West Arena is now fully functional with new dasher boards and glass and a new energy efficient state of the art refrigeration system with sub -floor heating. The project began with having to remove 18 feet of frost. He noted there are just a few minor punch list items to finish up but they are on schedule. MEETING ADJOURNED 10 EDINA HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 2010 7:00 PM — MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM Members Present Members Absent Zack Antar Jessi Kingston Arnie Bigbee Daria Brosius John Cashmore Lisa Finsness Bob Mayer Meg Newell Russ Stanton Staff Susan Howl Guests Scott Neal Joyce Repya Meeting Agenda Approved Member Cashmore seconded Member Stanton's motion to approve the meeting agenda for 11- 30 -10. The motion carried. Commission Minutes Approved Member Finsness seconded the motion of Member Cashmore to approve the Commission minutes as presented for October 26, 2010. The motion carried. Visiting Students Introduced and Welcomed The following students from the Valley View Middle School government class were visitors during the HRRC meeting: Jessica Bentley, Megan Froemming, Vivian Shubert and Lexi Struzyk. Also visiting was Ryan Gauthier of Edina Patch. City Manager Introduced and Welcomed Scott Neal, Edina's new City Manger, was welcomed aboard and to the Commission meeting, and introductions were made all around. A graduate of Iowa State, Mr. Neal shared he had been the City Manager of Morris, Tennessee for two years, the City Manger of Mt. Pleasant, Iowa for six years, the City Manager of Northfield for six years and the City Manager of Eden Prairie for eight years. He currently resides in Minneapolis, and he and his wife have three sons. Discussion ensued with Mr. Neal regarding the following: • HRRC's current and future participation in the human services funding procedure, funding of the Edina Resource Center and CDBG funding • Attendance policy regarding health issues • Student members' ability to vote • Proposed amendment to 180 of the City Code regarding reasonable accommodations for a commissioner with a temporary or permanent disability that would affect his /her ability to attend meetings • HRRC's current focus issue: bullying • State of Minnesota's annual conference on Human Rights in St. Paul on December I't 1, Mr. Neal shared that an ongoing human rights issue in Eden Prairie is the large Somali population. At the current time, Edina is not facing similar challenges. However, he predicted that one day Edina would be. Associate Planner Introduced and Welcomed Joyce Repya, Edina's Associate Planner, was introduced, welcomed and asked to present information about the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding process. Ms Repya explained the following: • CDBG is a federal entitlement program administered by HUD. • Hennepin County oversees the distribution of funds to communities. • 85% of the funds is designated for community development with an emphasis on the rehab of private property. 15% is designated for public services. • The City Council has requested that HRRC review and respond to the public services portion of the budget developed by Planning staff. • Ms. Repya will have a 2011 proposed CDBG budget for the Commission's review and comment at its January meeting. The Planning staff will then ready the proposal for publishing in the Sun Current. Edina Community Council Report Presented Member Finsness reminded the Commissioners of the Resource Center's special event at Braemar entitled "Breakfast With A Purpose." Its focus will be on Edina's youth and how to better serve those who are unable to afford after - school /summer activities. The appeal for contributions will be made for the purpose of providing grants to the youth -in -need and to develop a network of support for the Edina Resource Center. Member Finsness questioned the accessibility of the Resource Center on the website. She indicated that she will pass along the Community Council's budget scenario to the Commission at a later date. Reallocation of Proposed 2011 Funds Approved Member Newell seconded the motion of Member Stanton to approve a pro rata decrease in the amount of $1316 from the proposed 2011 human services budget in order to increase the Edina Resource Center's proposed budget to $38,316. The motion carried. It was suggested that Mayor Hovland be invited to a meeting of HRRC in the New Year to discuss HRRC's role in proposing human services funding, Resource Center funding and CDBG funding. Conversation centered around: The fiscal responsibility and oversight of the Resource Center The necessity of analytical evaluation An audit to see how we leverage money on behalf of Edina citizens Anti - Bullying /Cyber Bullying Subcommittee Update Presented Member Newell reported that the movie "Bullied" presented by the Southern Poverty Law Center was striking and significant. She shared an axis handout with the Commission which highlighted areas for projects to undertake in the community. As a result, the Commission could pull together a creative event where people would come together and express themselves around the issue of bullying. It could be an event for public recognition, celebration of efforts, and the opportunity to stimulate interest in and begin a conversation about the need to combat bullying. The goal would be the ultimate benefit derived for the sake of the entire community. With the students' involvement, this could be done as a S May -term project, involving the elementary schools and parents. Members Finsness and Newell will create an outline of bullet points to use to gain information and ideas from the following: Student Council, 212 Student Leadership, Thespians, Sober Squad, Gay /Straight Alliance, Youth - Serving- Youth, sports captains, Thespians, Rotary, Resource Center, Chamber, Kids Club, Art Center and Community Foundation. The following volunteered to contact particular organizations: • Member Newell — Edina Art Center • Member Finsness — Edina Resource Center, Community Foundation and Kids Club Administrative Process Updated Member Mayer reported that the nomination for 2011 HRRC officers will be preceded by interviews of any and all interested candidates. Additionally, preparations for the 2011 Tom Oye Award are underway, and a meeting with the City's Communications Director, Jennifer Bennerotte, will be initiated to expand ideas for publicity. It was announced that there is an opening for a Director of District 9 of the State Department of Human Rights and that Member Bigbee would be applying for this position. Member Stanton seconded Member Mayer's motion that the Edina Human Rights & Relations Commission endorses the nomination of Arnie Bigbee for a Director of District 9 of the State Department of Human Rights. The motion carried. Domestic Partner Insurance Benefits Discussed Member Stanton provided a sample resolution for the City Council to consider which would request that the State Legislature change the law to allow cities local control for defining "dependents" within health care plans. Member Cashmore seconded Member Stanton's motion to prepare this resolution and forward it to the City Council for consideration. The motion carried. Amnesty International Request Shared Student Member Brosius reported that the Edina High School chapter of Amnesty International would like to partner with HRRC to host a program next spring regarding the film "Dead Man Walking." It would be a community -wide event, and HRRC is being asked to help fund and provide publicity. It was suggested that a formal request be submitted by the chapter and delivered to Chair Bigbee at 6:30 PM before the next Commission meeting on December 14tH Proposed Revision to the City's Ordinance Regarding Commission Attendance Approved Member Stanton seconded Member Mayer's motion to approve and forward the Commissioner Attendance ordinance, edited by Member Newell, to the City Council. The motion carried. The newly - edited ordinance would accommodate a commissioner who is unable to attend the required number of meetings due to a disability. Samples of other similar ordinances from different municipalities were provided for guidelines. Adiournment There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:10 PM. •6 5 l f Az , Y I J Bloomington Public Health Quarterly Report ■ For the. City of Edina July — September 2010 tx a \ F') 4 G ��y .x_14 .. y - •6 5 l f Az , Y I J Bloomington Public Health Quarterly Report ■ For the. City of Edina July — September 2010 _,#p The work of Public Health is defined by six areas of responsibility. This report utilizes the areas of public health responsibility to organize details of activities conducted in Bloomington, Edina and Richfield. Activities in the following areas are described in this report: • Assure an adequate public health infrastructure • Promote healthy communities and healthy behaviors • Assure the quality and accessibility to health services • Prepare for and respond to disasters and assist communities in recovery • Prevent the spread of infectious diseases A special section highlighting the activities of SHIP (Statewide Health Improvement Program) has been added under "Promote healthy communities and healthy behaviors." ■ ASSURE AN ADEQUATE PUBLIC HEALTH INFRASTRUCTURE ■ Provided public health nursing clinical experience for 9 nursing students from Bethel University. Their experience began in September and will conclude in early November. The students observe and participate in a variety of public health activities. Their projects include health education materials and presentations. ■ PROMOTE HEALTHY COMMUNITIES AND HEALTHY BEHAVIORS ■ Addressed the following topics at monthly Senior Clinics: July Staying cool: Ways to stay cool — importance of planning the day August Hydration: The importance of extra fluids September Getting a flu shot: The difference between colds and the flu, appropriate treatments and when to call the doctor, covering your cough and hand washing B PH Quarterly Activities in Edina Presented results of the hotel/motel survey on deterring underage drinking. The survey was conducted with hotel/motel managers from Bloomington, Edina and Richfield in spring of 2010. It was conducted for the purpose of developing an environmental approach to reducing underage drinking. Survey results were'presented at the September Tri-City Partners meeting. Hotel/motel managers from Bloomington, Edina and Richfield were invited to attend. This project was funded by a Sober Truth on Preventing Underage Drinking grant. Contributed time and energy to students' success in a garden project at South Education Center. The purpose of the garden project was to improve students' awareness of and taste for fruits and vegetables as well as provide additional learning experiences. A Statewide Health Improvement Program mini -grant funded the project to develop the garden on school grounds. Students planted, cared for, harvested, prepared and consumed what was grown. Two PHN's who provide nursing services for the school assisted with watering to assure the plants' survival during hot, dry spells and taught students to bake breads with some of what they harvested. Updated a resource to help families imd locations for active, family fun in Bloomington, Edina and Richfield. The resource is titled Play Every Day - Ideas for Active Family Fun. Being active at an early age helps children develop a life -long practice of physical activity that prevents obesity. The resource also promotes all the great places in Bloomington, Edina and Richfield that families can have fun together. The resource is available on the City of Bloomington website. • Sponsored a two -part motivational interviewing workshop for professionals who have adult and youth clients with substance use concerns. Tri-City Partners Coalition for Healthy Youth and Communities, organized by ,Bloomington Public Health, sponsored the workshop entitled "Facilitating Change. • Exceeded Healthy People 2010 Breastfeeding Goals among clients in the Women, Infants and Children (WIC) supplemental nutrition program-The Bloomington Public Health WIC program was awarded State recognition for achieving 88 percent breastfeeding initiation, 51 percent breastfeeding six months and longer, and 32 percent breastfeeding one year or longer. Specially trained counselors meet with women pre and post partum to promote, support and problem -solve breastfeeding at WIC clinics. SHIP (STATEWIDE HEALTH IMPROVEMENT. PROGRAM). ■ Facilitated the installation of 55 new bike racks to make biking for transportation and, physical activity easier. Collaborated with Public Works, Parks and Recreation and... school staffs from Bloomington, Edina and Richfield, as well as the Bike Edina Task Force; to determine bike rack needs. The bike racks were installed at schools, city offices .and recreational facilities, and farmers markets. They have the.capacity to hold, 234 bikes. Provided funding and feedback for the "Kicking Butts" campaign to remind residents that parks and recreation areas are tobacco free. Edina Communications and Marketing Director, Jennifer Bennerotte, created the campaign. A video public service announcement ran on government cable stations in Bloomington and Edina_ The PSA can also be viewed on.the.cities'- websites. Posters were displayed in parks and 2 BPH Quarterly Activities in Edina recreation areas. The campaign will also be used in Richfield for implementation of the new tobacco free parks ordinance in that city. • Planned a workshop series to assist community leaders and residents foster a culture of active living. The series includes two workshops that will provide an opportunity for participants to increase their understanding of healthy community designs and how they benefit public health as well as local economies and environments. Participants will create action plans for making each city more supportive of health where residents are able to integrate physical activity into daily routines and it is accessible, easy and affordable to everyone. Mark Fenton, an authority on public health issues and Active Living policy initiatives, will present at the workshop on November 8. Prevention Minnesota at Blue Cross Blue Shield will present at the workshop on December 1. • Completed 13 mini -grant site visits to discuss progress, challenges and successes. A second round of site visits will occur at the end of November and early December as mini - grantees wrap up their activities. • Facilitated meetings to review SHIP progress and determine additional initiatives to pursue in the second year of SHIP. Meetings were held with SHIP Community Leadership Team Members in each of the cities. ■ Attended and conducted trainings to increase physical activity in childcare and preschool settings. Attended an IMIL (I Am Moving I Am Learning) train the trainer workshop sponsored by the Minnesota Department of Health. Collaborated with Dakota County to provide a one - and -a- half -day IMIL training to 120 child care employees of Especially for Children Child Care Centers. IMIL uses the important mind -body connection to integrate movement into existing curriculum. The result is increased moderate and vigorous physical activity, enhanced brain development and kindergarten readiness in 2- to 5- year -olds. • Conducted a "Bike to the Market" promotion to encourage shopping at local farmers markets and using bicycle transportation. Riders received a $2 Farmers Market certificate to use at the market and a map showing new bike racks at the market. The promotion was conducted over three weeks at each of the markets, with ridership increasing each week. • Provided seed money for garden projects at SECA (South Education Center Alternative), STEM School (Richfield), Highlands Elementary (Edina) and Poplar Bridge Elementary (Bloomington). The gardens at SECA, STEM School and Highlands have been built, planted and harvested. Gardens at Poplar Bridge have been built for use next growing season. The garden projects are a result of SHIP mini -grants awarded earlier this year to increase student awareness of and access to fresh fruits and vegetables and increase physical activity. Students were actively involved in building the gardens, planting, maintaining and harvesting the produce, preparing foods and participating in tastings and meal celebrations. • Assisted Southdale Internal Medicine, P.A. plan implementation of obesity and chronic disease prevention guidelines. Presented information to physicians at Southdale Internal Medicine, P.A. on two prevention guidelines: Prevention and Management of Obesity and Primary Prevention of Chronic Disease. The guidelines are best practices - -- B P H Quarterly Activiries in Edina developed by the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI), Provided a'toolkit of l resources and support materials developed-by SHIP staff. Surveyed providers on current treatment strategies and supported clinic staff in gathering additional data to set goals for.. implementation of guidelines. ■ Conducted online survey to assess use of the Farmers Market. One hundred seventy- one people responded, but not all responded to each of 16 survey questions. Over half (54. percent) of those responding spend at least $21 every visit. Forty-two percent of people increased their fruit consumption and sixty -seven percent increased their vegetable consumption. Park and Recreation staff assisted with the survey. ■ ASSURE THE QUALITY AND ACCESSIBILITY TO HEALTH SERVICES ■ Followed -up on 5 new senior and vulnerable adult referrals. Referrals were for chronic disease management (3) and mental illness (2). Public Health Nurses (PHNs) conducted in -home assessments and arranged resources to help clients live safely and independently in their homes. In one case, a Public a Health Nurse offered additional services beyond what was requested by a client with severe back pain. The Edina Resource Center made the referral for assistance with homemaking. After completing a functional and safety assessment for the client, the PHN also offered food delivery and transportation assistance. Most importantly, the Nurse assisted the client to obtain a home physical therapy referral through her doctor. ■ PREPARE FOR AND RESPOND TO DISASTERS AND ASSIST COMMUNITIES IN RECOVERY • Conducted 5 workshops to train 82 faith community leaders to use the new Faith . Based Organizations Emergency Preparedness Toolkit. The Toolkit was also presented at the Minnesota Department of Health's Mass Prophylaxis Conference. • Conducted 9 focus groups to identify barriers to accessing H1N1 vaccinations (5 in Bloomington,1 in Edina and 2 in Richfield). A total of 82 persons from at -risk populations participated. They included low- income seniors and persons with limited English. 4 BPHStaff Involvement in Community Groups Edina ■ EDINA Edina Community Council Edina Chemical Health Partners Edina Partners for Early Education Edina Professionals Serving Seniors Edina Resource Center Edina Senior Center Advisory Council Family Center Advisory Committee Help Me Grow South Hennepin (formerly known as SHIELD) REGIONAL Emergency Preparedness WORKGROUPS Community Outreach Cities Readiness Initiative Steering Committee Emergency and Community Health Outreach Advisory Committee Hennepin County Public Health Emergency Preparedness Advisory Committee Metro Health Alert Network Coordinators Metro Mass Dispensing Metro Medical Reserve Corp / Minnesota Responds Metro Pharmaceutical Cache Metropolitan Medical Response System Special Needs Sheltering Task Force Public Health Emergency Coordinators Regional Exercise Health Promotion and Planning Hennepin County Advisory Board of Health Tri-City Partners Tri-City Partners Family Health South Hennepin Interagency Early Intervention Governance Committee (includes Edina, Bloomington, Richfield and Eden Prairie School Districts) r D D' _LF BPS ua e 1 umbers Report for Edina ■ 2010 PROGRAMS AND SERVICES These numbers area count of people served each quarter. Some people receive the same service and are counted in more than one quarter. Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 • HEALTH PROMOTION Community health presentations # of adults 117 115 234 School educational presentations # of students 495 0 0 SHIP presentations. # of attendees 25 31 13 • ADULT AND SENIOR SERVICES Senior health receives referrals from police, senior outreach, social services, environmental health and other community agencies for vulnerable adults and falls. Individual clients served # of clients 12 14 5 Public Health Nurse visits # of individual nursing visits 10 10 4 Service coordination # of calls and case conferences 25 18 7 Senior hearing screening # ofparticipants 16 6 16 Senior Community Public Health Nurse Clinics # of clients 75 103 140 # of consultations 118 124 130 Health education presentations # ofparticipants 0 27 0 • FAMILY HEALTH SERVICES Maternal and Child Health PHN home - visiting # offamilies 28 22 24 # of clients 50 42 48 # of visits 126 106 85 Car seats # referrals 0 0 2 SHIELD # of children 15 18 18 Police reports reviewed for follow -up # offamilies 16 5 15 South Vista # ofpregnant and/or parenting adolescents 1 1 1 Follow Along clients # of children enrolled 29 30 29 Child -care consultations # of centers / # of visits made 3/9 3/9 3/8 High -risk birth certificate referrals follow -up # of babies 32 47 20 Q4 ■ CLINIC SERVICES Q2 Women, Infants and Children (WIC) # of clients(unduplicated) Health Risk Assessment Clinic # of clients Sage Screening Program # of clients SagePlus Cardiovascular Screening # of clients Immunization Clinic # of adult clients 2 # of immunizations Immunization Clinic # of children 3 # of immunizations Flu shots - seasonal # of clients Flu shots - H1N1 # of immunizations Head Start early childhood screenings # of children screened Intake calls & drop -in visits # of contacts Perinatal Hepatitis B # of clients Reportable disease follow -up / consultations # of contacts Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 204 218 210 6 4 6 6 7 14 2 3 5 1 3 2 1 3 5 1 2 11 2 9 26 13 0 80 233 0 NA NA 0 2 25 29 20 1 0 0 12 10 14 IL Statewide Health Improvement Program MINNI 9C)iAS VISION Icy::. t,..,. Click here to view as web page. December 8, 2010 In this issue School Initiatives . International Walk to School Day inspires Edina Highlands parents to do more . Changes at Bloomington Westwood Elementary get more students active School representatives learn about creating healthier school environments Community Initiatives Richfield adopts Tobacco -Free Parks Ordinance for its entire park system . Active Living Workshops draw interest from Bloomington, Edina and Richfield . 870 more children under age 5 in Bloomington, Edina and Richfield can "make strides" for better health . Upcoming LANA Workshop — January 2011 . Shoppers at Edina Farmers Market eat more fruits and vegetables Continued on next page 1. ' SHIP Help us make our community better for our health! Share this eNewsletter with a friend. Join the SHIP eNewsletter mailing list. Reminder: Check our SHIP website for updates and current events. School Initiatives International Walk to School Day inspires Edina Highlands parents to do more A group of dedicated and enthusiastic parents from Highlands Elementary is making an effort to promote walking and biking to school year- round. Their efforts resulted from the October 6 International Walk to School Day on which 45 Highlands Elementary students walked or biked to school. Picture at right. The parents have been meeting with Principal Hodne and SHIP staff to plan several Walk to School Day events. Upcoming dates are Thursday, December 9 and Thursday, January 13. On these dates, parents from nearby neighborhoods will organize and lead walking groups of students to school. Students who walk or bike will be recognized and receive a sticker upon arrival at school cancelled only if temperature or wind chill is below zero degrees. Back . The event will be Changes at Bloomington Westwood Elementary get more students active With SHIP support, Westwood Elementary School created lasting changes that will benefit students' health. Students are playing more active games at recess and recess can no longer be withheld as discipline. It's part of their commitment to increase the physical activity of students. Janelle Berry Burlingame, Westwood physical t = 1 education teacher, recognized that students would benefit from more structured activities and games # during recess. More children would be playing rather than standing around. This fall, she worked with the grounds maintenance staff to have their new black top striped for Peaceful Playgrounds games (purchased by the PTA, picture above) to serve that 4 • Community gardening purpose. Balls and other game materials where purchased through SHIP funds. She trained staff opportunities for faith- on the Peaceful Playgrounds Program and taught students the games. based organizations in Bloomington, Edi ^a Implementing the active recess games through a Peaceful Playground Program is providing Richfield! students a way to be involved in structured active play time on a daily basis. Kate Maher, SHIP and Community Groups liaison to Bloomington Schools observed, "I stopped by one day after school and 20 students • Learn more about were self- organizing and playing the games Around the World and Four Square." That's the expansion of intent! community garde r, , :. also improve students' learning and behavior. Bloomington Council unanimously Back . Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota — Biggest Loser Minnesota Challenge for School representatives learn about creating healthier school environments Employers, Employees and Community Groups In November, Bloomington and Edina school representatives attended a conference to learn strategies for implementing policies and practices that will make school environments healthier. For Your Information They also learned that the policies and practices for making a healthier school environment can also improve students' learning and behavior. Minn Local: Edina City Council unanimously The representatives were school board members, principals, food service personnel, teachers, endorses creek -based parents, curriculum directors and health services personnel. Ten were from Edina and 12 were trail from Bloomington. SHIP school liaisons from Bloomington, Edina and Richfield school districts also attended. Kate Maher, Bloomington school liaison, said, "It was a good conference. We learned there is a lot to do, but we've got a good start." cJk Community Initiatives Richfield adopts Tobacco -Free Parks Ordinance for its entire park system The Richfield City Council voted unanimously in September to adopt a Tobacco -Free Parks Ordinance. The ordinance prohibits tobacco use within all city -owned parks, conservation areas, open spaces, or recreational facilities. The comprehensive ordinance is similar to those in Edina and Bloomington and covers all activities in Richfield parks and recreation areas. We'd like to thank Mayor Debbie Goettel, City Council Members, Recreation Services Director Jim Topitzhofer, City Attorney Corrine Hiene and all others who made this happen. Policies such as this go a long way to promote positive role modeling for youngsters. It helps them choose a tobacco -free lifestyle and protects the health of our community. SHIP worked with Tobacco Free Youth Recreation to assist Richfield Recreation Services draft the policy. Together, we helped with educational materials, technical assistance and informing the public. SHIP is continuing to work with Richfield City Staff as they prepare to communicate and implement the policy in January 2011. Send your thanks! When public officials enact policies that protect the health of the community they represent, they need to be thanked for their actions. SHIP encourages you to congratulate the Richfield Mayor and City Council for the positive steps they've taken in promoting and protecting the health of the public! Back Active Living Workshops draw interest from Bloomington, Edina and Richfield Exciting ideas for creating active environments resulted from the first session of the Active Living Workshop series on November 8. Guest speaker, Mark Fenton (picture at right), shared a wealth of information and resources on ways to design communities that are more active. These communities would support healthy living as well as provide economic and environmental benefits. The workshop thoroughly engaged participants. Over 50 Bloomington, Edina and Richfield residents and city staff members, including elected leaders and those instrumental in city design, attended. On December 1, members of the three communities returned and began working on plans to promote "Complete Streets" policies. These policies encourage community designs that incorporate the needs of all users. More information will follow. Read more about the workshop on StarTribune.com. Back 870 more children under age 5 in Bloomington, Edina and Richfield can "make strides" for better health In November, 20 childcare and preschool staff members attended the SHIP sponsored I Am Moving, I Am Learning workshop. They learned strategies for adding physical activity to the day through curriculum and policies. Early and regular physical activity is important because it impacts children's health and brain development. The staff members represented 12 preschools and childcare centers that are trained to add more physical activity. They will reach 870 more children in Bloomington, Edina and Richfield. That brings the total number of children in the three cities impacted by the training to nearly 2200 That number will grow as childcare centers and preschools implement policies to ensure early and ongoing physical activity. The workshop has been a great success. One participant said, "I really enjoyed this workshop! So many simple ideas to use in my program to encourage movement throughout the entire day!" Back Upcoming LANA Workshop — January 2011 Many Bloomington, Edina and Richfield childcare centers and preschools have taken positive steps to improve the health of children. They attended the LANA (Learning About Nutrition thorough Activities) workshop offered through SHIP. This training is being offered one last time in January 2011. LANA is a fun nutrition program that has proven to help 2- to 5- year -olds eat more fruits and vegetables and become less picky eaters. These results have been observed in both the classroom and at home. A wide variety of programs can implement LANA: half -day or full -day programs, those that serve meals or snacks as well as those who ask parents to provide these foods. Funding is also available to facilities that implement a written nutrition policy! The workshop is a two -part, evening series on January 13 and 20. It runs from 6:30 to 8:30 both evenings in the Haeg Conference Room at Bloomington Civic Plaza. January 7 is the deadline for childcare center and preschool staff members to register. Registration and information here. Become part of the growing list of programs providing healthier environments for children! Back Shoppers at Edina Farmers Market eat more fruits and vegetables According to an online survey with people who shop at the Centennial Lakes Farmers Market, 67 percent of respondents say they eat more vegetables as a result of shopping at the market. And 43 percent are eating more fruit. City of Edina Parks and Recreation Department conducted the survey and will use customer feedback from the survey to make an even better Farmers Market next year. There may not be a lot to improve, however, because Edina residents love having the market at Centennial Lakes. One respondent wrote, "Of all of the farmers markets in the city, this is our favorite! It has all of the variety of produce and other goods as the bigger markets, but is close to home and we know it is all locally grown!" Picture at right. .r Other findings from survey respondents: . Most live in Edina. . Forty -nine percent shop at the market every week. . They typically spent $11 -20 at the Farmers Market on fruits and vegetables. SHIP provided considerable support to launch the Farmers Market in Edina this year and continues to assist in collecting customer feedback and plan for next year. 31 -k Community gardening opportunities for faith -based organizations in Bloomington, Edina and Richfield! The communities of Bloomington, Edina and Richfield are exploring community gardens as a means to increase the availability of nutritious foods. SHIP funds are available to support start -up costs to faith -based organizations in the three cities that are interested in getting a community garden started. Get inforirat'on from our Community Gardening Fact Sheet. In addition, a free workshop is being offered by Gardening Matters for faith -based groups on this topic. Gardening Matters is a non - profit organization whose mission is to work with gardeners to create vibrant, sustainable community gardens that are assets to the communities in which they reside. How to Start a Faith -Based Community Garden Date: December 16, 2010 Time: 6:30 to 8:30 p.m. Location: World Relief of Minnesota 1515 East 66th Street Richfield, MN 55423 RSVP: Nadja Berneche at 612- 492 -8964 or nadja .gardeningmatters @gmail.com. If you have any questions or would like more information, please contact Sueling Schardin at 952- 563 -8915 or sschardin @ci.bloomington.mn.us. Learn more about expansion of community gardens in Bloomington An informational meeting will be held on December 14, 2010 to discuss the City of Bloomington community garden plans. City staff will provide a brief overview of plans that include expansion of the existing community garden in Smith Park and creating a new community garden in Harrison Park. City staff will be available to take your comments and address your questions. Bloomington Community Gardens Informational Meeting Date: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 Time: 7:00 PM — 8:30 PM Location: City Council Chambers Bloomington Civic Plaza 1800 West Old Shakopee Road Bloomington, MN 55431 Back Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota — Biggest Loser Minnesota Challenge for Employers, Employees and Community Groups This January, the Alliance for a Healthier Minnesota will launch The Biggest Loser Minnesota Challenge, a statewide competition designed to encourage all Minnesotans to adopt a healthy lifestyle. This is a great opportunity for employers, employees and community groups to support their healthy lifestyle changes as well as benefit local food banks. The Alliance is a group of Minnesota employers that have developed programs encouraging Minnesotans to eat better and move more. When you sign up for The Challenge, you and your teammates can earn points for healthy behaviors like dropping extra pounds, hitting the gym and eating healthy foods. Teams compete against each other for online trophies and the glory of victory! The Minnesota Challenge runs for 12 weeks in 2011 from January 24 to April 15. You may register for The Challenge anytime between January 7 and 23, 2011. Anyone age 18 or older who lives or works in Minnesota may participate. Click here for complete details. Employers participating in The Challenge can provide additional support to employees with help from SHIP. SHIP staff can conduct a comprehensive, worksite, physical activity assessment and develop an action plan for increasing employees' physical activity options. The action plan also includes supporting employees in being more physically active outside of the workday. Interested employers can contact Sueling Schardin at sschardin @ci.bloomington.mn.us or 952 - 563 -8915 Back For Your Information Minn Local: Edina City Council unanimously endorses creek -based trail The Edina City Council unanimously endorsed a creek -based route for the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail Tuesday, December 7. The regional trail would connect with segments in Richfield, Hopkins. Construction of the 7.5 -mile trail in the city is still several years away. Three Rivers Park District, which will build and maintain the trail, must first secure the estimated $20 million cost and reach an agreement with the city on specific trail design. Read the story at minnlocal.com. Back