Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-01-18 COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL JANUARY 18, 2011 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made•by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as-to Council'items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold,,print are.Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless -a- Commissioner or Council Member so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of January 4, 2010 II. Restated Easement &. Parking Ramp Agreement — 5013, 5017 and 5125 Vernon Avenue (City of Edina Liquor Store And Parking Ramp Site And Jerry's Enterprises Sites.) III. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL * I.. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of January 4, 2011, Work Sessions of January 4, 2011,, January 5, 2011, January 6, 2011,.and January 11, 2011 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings, the, ,Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make . their presentations. if you,wish to testify on the topic,,yo.0 are welcome toAo.so -as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: Individuals must. limit their testimony to'three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed. necessary. Try not to repeat "remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING: Minnehaha Woods Street Reconstruction Improvement No. BA -334, Resolution No. 2011 -14 (Favorable rollcall vote of four Council Members to approve) B. PUBLIC HEARING: Golf Terrace Street Reconstruction Improvement No. BA -355, Resolution No. 2011 -13 (Favorable rollcall vote of four Council Members to approve) Agenda/Edina City Council January 18, 2011 Page 2 C. PUBLIC HEARING: Carson's Hill Street Reconstruction Improvement No. BA -370, Resolution No. 2011 -15 (Favorable rollcall vote of four Council Members to approve) III. AWARD OF BID /CHANGE ORDERS * A. Change Orders— Edinborough Bathroom Addition Project * B. 2011 Fuel Purchase * C. 2011 Stainless Steel Truck Body and Tailgate Sander — Park Maintenance Department IV. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Local 49 Bargaining Unit Contract 2010 -2011 B. Ordinance No. 2011 -01 Establishing A Veterans Memorial (First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass.) C. Energy & Environment Commission — Green Step Cities Report D. Energy & Environment Commission —Solar Panel Grant Request * E. Resolution No. 2011 -21 Requesting An Amendment To Minnesota Statutes Allowing Health Coverage To Be Extended To Domestic Partners At The Discretion Of Local Jurisdictions * F. Resolution No. 2011 -17, Receiving Feasibility Reports for Neighborhood Street Reconstruction For: 1. BA -371 Killarney Shores Street Reconstruction 2. BA -372 McCauley Heights Street Reconstruction 3. BA -373 Oscar Roberts Street Reconstruction 4. BA -383 West 44th Street Reconstruction * G. Resolution No. 2011 -19 Authorizing Metropolitan Livable Communities Act Grant Agreement — Grandview Small Area Plan * H. Resolution No. 2011 -20 Amending Public Health Emergency Response (PHER) Grant I. Resolution No.2011 -16 Accepting Various Donations J. Board and Commission Appointments * K. Resolution No. 2011 -21 for Traffic Control Signal Agreement No. 98010M for TH169 & Londonderry Road V. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speaks on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Poor Quality Document Disclaimer The original or copy of a document or page of a document presented at the time of digital scanning contained within this digital file may be of substandard quality for viewing, printing or faxing needs. Agenda/Edina City Council January 18, 2011 Page 3 Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VI. FINANCE * A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per, Pre -List dated January 6, 2010, TOTAL $1,195,327.69; and per Pre -List dated January 13, 2010, TOTAL $1,165,079.04; and Credit Card Transactions 11/27/10 — 12/27/10 TOTAL: $5,264.12 VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence VIII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS IX. MANAGER'S COMMENTS X. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952 - 927 - 886172 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Tues Jan 18 Work Session — Planning Items 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Jan 18 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Jan 25 Study Session —to be determined 11:30 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Feb 1 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur Feb 3 Work Session — Boards & Commissions 4:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Feb 15 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Feb 21 PRESIDENTS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Mon Feb 28 Joint Meeting With Edina School Board 5:00 P.M. To Be Determined Tues Mar 1 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Mar 15 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Mar 21 Annual Meeting— Boards & Commissions 5:00 P.M. HUGHES PAVILION Tues Apr 5 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Apr 18 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur Apr 28 Volunteer Recognition Reception 5:00 P.M. EDINBOROUGH PARK GREAT HALL /-A O wj O L • f 171 �Fi W MJ�1�, .nnu MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Cary Teague, Director of Planning RE: Restated Easement & Parking Ramp Agreement — 5013, 5017 and 5125 Vernon Avenue (City of Edina Liquor Store and parking ramp site and Jerry' Enterprises sites.) DATE: Work Session — January 18, 2011 INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Please refer to the packet of information provided for Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority agenda item II. • �`t*!TNr1-MOO MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Cary Teague, Director of Planning RE: The Waters Senior Housing Project — Final Plat (Park Dedication) and Requested Tax Increment Financing (TIF) DATE: Work Session — January 18, 2011 INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Shelter Corporation is requesting that the City Council consider the two outstanding items in regard to their approved project to build the 139 -unit senior housing units: 1. Final Plat. Shelter Corporation has withdrawn its request for the City to waive the Park Dedication Fee required as part of the Final Plat. Therefore, per Section 810.13. Subd. 5 of the City Code, the presumptive cash fee for subdivision of land is $5,000 per dwelling unit to satisfy the City's park dedication requirement. The City may also require a land dedication if necessary. As highlighted . in the review of the rezoning proposal, a 10 -foot trail easement was recommended to be dedicated along the south side of Olinger Boulevard for a possible future regional trail. As such, the value of the 10 -foot trail easement would be taken from the $695,000 dedication amount. Based on the sale price of the land, the value of the easement would be $81,600. In addition, per the approved plans, the applicant is planting 33 trees within Countryside Park and in the right -of -way for Highway 62, and they would like to make their walking trail on site available to the general public. The value of the trees is $45,000 and the value of the additional trail connected to the park is valued at $17,500. The total presumptive park dedication cost would be $695,000 with no land dedication, or public improvements. With the dedicated trail easement, access to the on -site sidewalk, and tree plantings in public space, the total cash dedication would be $550,900. As the City Council is aware, the City amended its park dedication requirements a couple of years ago. The previous dedication requirement was for 8% of the value of the land. Using that formula The Waters would have been required a dedication amount of $280,000. 2. Tax Increment Financing (TIF). Tax Increment Financing is requested by the applicant in order to provide 28 units of affordable housing. (See attached letter from Mark Ruff, the City's financial consultant and a memo from the applicant summarizing the request.) The City has established a goal with the Met Council to provide between 138 -212 affordable housing units between the years 2011 and 2020. For rental housing, an affordable unit is housing that is affordable to renters earning 50% of area median income. This project would provide a good start in attempting to meet the Met Council goals. Participation with the Met Council in establishing goals and obtaining affordable housing within the City, allows Edina to apply for funding for Livable Communities Act (LCA) grants. This year, City has obtained two grants for funding from LCA grants. The first is for the GrandView Small Area Plan, and the second is for the rehabilitation project of the existing Yorkdale Townhomes. Mr. Ruff and representatives from Shelter Corporation will be at the Work Session to further discuss. ATTACHMENTS: Park Dedication Fee Analysis Memo from Mark Ruff regarding the TIF proposal. Documents from Shelter Corporation in regard to the proposed TIF 4 Q To: Scott Neal, City of Edina MCary Teague, City of Edina W From: Mark Ruff Z Date: January 12, 2011 Subject: Waters Senior Living of Edina Request for Tax Increment Financing Shelter Corporation, through its affiliate Waters Senior Living, and its financial and development partner Colonial Church have requested that the City of Edina establish a tax increment financing (TIF) district. The purpose of the TIF district is to reduce the rents for 28 of the proposed 139 senior housing units located adjacent to the Church's campus and make the units more affordable to persons of lower incomes. The City is able to establish a TIF district for this vacant land site if at least 20% of the rental units are occupied by persons with annual incomes at or below 50% of median income, adjusted for family size. A one person household with incomes at 50% of the area median would need to earn no more than approximately $29,000. The TIF district would carry a maximum duration of 26 years under state law, beginning with the first full year of taxes payable in 2014. The Waters Senior Living of Edina is requesting 20 years of tax increment payments. The City would not issue bonds for the TIF. The developer would be responsible for financing the TIF. The City would be obligated to pay TIF on an annual basis only if TIF is received. This property currently pays no property taxes because it is an exempt use. After the development is built, it is anticipated that approximately $255,000 of property taxes will be paid each year. Approximately $80,000 of those property taxes will immediately be payable to the City, County. and School District as the "base taxes" related to the land value of the property and the School District's operating levy. The remaining $175,000 of incremental taxes is available each year for the development. The Waters Senior Living of Edina has stated that it will reduce rents in an amount equal to $350,000 per year. Therefore 50% of the costs of the affordability will be covered by the TIF. In addition, the developer has stated that they would guarantee lower rents in addition to guaranteeing that 20% of the units will occupied by lower income renters. The developer expects that low income residents will utilize the elderly waiver program. The developer will explain the elderly waiver program at the Council's work session. The City can keep up to 10% of the annual TIF for administrative costs. The City could also use part of the TIF for other affordable housing developments in the City if sufficient TIF is available. EHLERS LEADERS IN PUBLIC FINANCE mmehlers- inc.com Minnesota phone 651- 697 -8500 3060 Centre Pointe Drive Offices also in Wisconsin and Illinois fax 651 -697 -8555 Roseville, MN 55113 -1122 toll free 800 - 552 -1171 To establish a TIF district, the City must undertake the following steps: 1. Notify the local county commissioner of the proposed TIF District. 2. Draft a TIF plan. 3. Send the TIF plan to the County Board and School Board and request comments. 4. Publish a notice of public hearing. 5. Hold a public hearing. 6. Approve a resolution establishing the TIF district. 7. Approve a contract with the Waters Senior Living of Edina detailing the terms and conditions of the assistance. The City must make certain findings related to the development. These findings include the project's consistency with the City's comprehensive plan, the project's furtherance of larger development goals such as increased tax base and affordable housing, and the project's financial need for TIF assistance. To address the last finding, we have requested financial documents from the developer. Specifically, we have reviewed the project's sources and uses of funds, projected rents and expenses, debt service assumptions, and similarity to other development's actual expenses and occupancy. The project is expected to cost over $35,000,000. Hard construction is expected to be $26,000,000. The land is valued by the development at $3,500,000. The developer has shared a financing scenario which is one of several being considered at this time. In that scenario, the first mortgage is $25,000,000 with a 40 year term and a $5,000,000 second mortgage is amortized over 20 years. Equity in the project is shown at $6,000,000. Approximately $2,000,000 of the equity is related to Colonial Church's land value (not paid at closing) and approximately $1,000,000 is necessary for reserves that may be reimbursed to the developer if the project leases up on schedule. In addition, the project is paying a developer fee of approximately $1,000,000. Annual cashflow after debt service but before depreciation is expected to be $500,000 per year, without TIF assistance but with the affordable rents. This is approximately an annual return on equity of 8.5% to 11 %, depending upon the level of reserves necessary by the financing. With TIF assistance, the annual return on equity is raised up to a range of 11.5% to 15 %. If the Council proceeds with the TIF process, we would further refine the analysis to narrow the range of the equity returns and offer further perspective on rents, expenses, construction costs and the land value. If the Council were to take the next step to authorize staff to call a public hearing for the TIF district, the public hearing could take place as soon as March 151'. We recommend that the City also consider the development agreement at that same meeting. If a public hearing is set, we also recommend a cash deposit be made by the developer of $15,000 to cover the City's costs for legal and financial consulting associated with the tax increment plan and contract. We look forward to discussing this project with you further. THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING OF EDINA Affordable Housing Opportunity The Waters Senior Living and Colonial Church of Edina are partnering to create a new senior living community on Colonial Church's campus. Colonial Church has agreed to sell 6 acres of its campus to The Waters Senior Living to develop and construct 139 new senior housing units. While the project currently assumes that all the units will be rented at market rates, we are interested in exploring whether we could make at least 28 units available to qualified seniors at an affordable housing rate. The Need There is a significant need for affordable assisted living senior housing in Edina. At every public meeting where the development has been presented, seniors have asked about the availability of affordable housing. There are approximately 10,000 Edina residents over the age of 65. The 2000 Census estimated approximately 30% of these residents or 3,000 Edina residents have annual incomes below 50% of the area median income for a family of one ($28,300). These seniors would benefit from the creation of affordable assisted living in Edina who chooses to reside in their community while receiving home and community based services. The alternative choices for low income seniors are few and often result in admission to a nursing home where the care is often much more institutional and far more costly to the State of Minnesota. In addition, the creation of senior affordable housing would help Edina meet the Metropolitan Council's affordable housing goals. Effect on the Project The proposed Waters Senior Living of Edina assumes a 100% market rate senior housing community designed to be the finest senior living in Edina. Adding affordable housing units will have an economic impact on the project. In order to partially offset this impact and to make the senior housing more affordable to low income seniors, we expect to use Elderly Waivers from the State of Minnesota through Hennepin County as the foundation of an affordable housing program. The Elderly Waiver Program helps supplement the cost of the services that the senior needs to live on a daily basis. At present, the Elderly Waiver Program is under the financial scrutiny given the condition of the State of Minnesota Budget. DOCS- #3313497 -v2 Even with the revenue from the Elderly Waiver Program, there will be an income gap as compared with a 100% market rate project. The following example illustrates this situation: One Bedroom Elderly Waiver monthly revenue $2,470 One Bedroom market rate with comparable services $3,525 Rent difference between market & affordable $1,055 Number of affordable housing units (20 9/6) 28 Annual cost for the 28 affordable housing units $354,480 Pay -As -You Go Tax Increment Financing One option to address the income gap is tax increment financing. In a similar project, The Colony at Eden Prairie, the City of Eden Prairie approved a pay -as- you -go tax increment district to make 20% of the senior housing units affordable. Similarly the City of Minneapolis recently approved a pay -as- you -go tax increment district combined with $614,000 of housing subsidy funds to make 20% of the senior housing units affordable, The Waters Senior Housing at Minnehaha. In this case, the total property tax bill would be approximately $230,000 with approximately $175,000 available for tax increment assistance. Under these assumptions, the available pay -as- you -go tax increment assistance to The Waters Senior Living would cover approximately half of the affordable housing cost. Affordable Housing Parameters The seniors living in the affordable housing would need to have incomes below 50% adjusted for family size and assets would be taken into account. At The Colony at Eden Prairie most of the affordable units are occupied by seniors receiving Elderly Waiver assistance. The Elderly Waiver Program is funded by the Minnesota Department of Human Services and Hennepin County administers the approval of every senior receiving an Elderly Waiver to enable them to live in an assisted living community. The senior's alternative to receiving an Elderly Waiver is to go into a nursing home which is significantly more expensive. The Elderly Waiver program is designed for low income seniors who basically rely upon Social Security and have very limited assets. It has two basic pieces: a housing payment through the Group Residential Housing program with a current monthly payment of $846 and a customized service package to allow the senior to get the services that they need to achieve their activities of daily living. Each senior's customized service package is determined through consultation with the onsite nursing staff and Hennepin County staff. The average customized service package at The Colony at Eden Prairie is approximately $1,624 per month. The combination of DOCS- #3313497 -v2 the housing payment of $846 plus the customized service package of $1,624 equals $2,470 the cost used in the example above. For The Waters Senior Living of Edina, the following parameters would be contractually agreed to: • The Waters Senior Living of Edina would agree to create 28 units of affordable housing for the term of the tax increment district — 20 years. As illustrated above, the tax increment assistance covers approximately 50% of the affordable housing cost. The senior housing development would pay the remaining 50% cost out of cash flow. • For the 28 affordable housing units, there would be priority given to seniors with Elderly Waivers from Hennepin County. • The next priority would be for any senior without an Elderly Waiver would have to have been living in Edina. If there are not any of these priorities on the waiting list, it would be open to low income seniors living anywhere. • The rents for the non - Elderly Waiver would be determined in the same way that Elderly Waiver rents are determined: base housing rent of $846 plus the cost of the customized service package. Summary The tax increment assistance will help 28 lower income senior families live in a superb senior housing community and will help Edina meet their affordable housing goals. Even with tax increment-financing , there still remains a financial gap to create the 28 affordable housing units. Requested Assistance The Waters Senior Living of Edina requests that Edina create a Qualified Housing Tax Increment District with a 20 year term to create 28 senior affordable housing units at The Waters Senior Living of Edina. DOCS- #3313497 -v2 WATERS OF EDINA FFORDABLE SIN One Bedroom Elderly Waiver monthly rent 25470 One Bedroom market rate with comparable services 35525 Affordable Housing monthly revenue gap (11,055) Tax Increment (per unit per month) 520 Balance to owners 535 Number of affordable housing units 28 Annual cost for affordable housing units 3543480 Pay as you go annual Tax Increment 1743682 WATERS SENIOR LIVI, .G OF EDINA PARK DEDICATION FEE ANALYSIS PREVIOUS EDINA PARK DEDICATION FEE Land valuation 70,000 Park fee 8% 285,600 PROPOSED EDINA PARK DEDICATION FEE Public related Item Comments Cost Olinger easement from Colonial Church 10 feet by 637 feet at $12.81 per square foot 81,600 Black Hill Spruce planted on public land 33 trees 45,000 Senior walking trail around pond walking trail 17,500 0 144,100 Edina Park Dedication fee ($5,000 per unit) 695;000 Public related costs 144,100 Balance to be paid 550,900 ANTICIPATED RESIDENT AGE PROFILE (1� Less than 70 years old 5 70 to 80 years old 17 Over 80 years old 127 3% 11% 85% Number of residents paying for garage stalls 22 15% (1) Based upon actuals from The Colony at Eden Prairie 5 - - -- _ . OLINGER UID. (• a _ ----------- SM37:SI� _ _ &EEI ( (fi]fi.91 polo) -- IQ :A ;S z STATE' LECIEW • Fa mvmnetL O mFm DI 1. FU bm mmumml x1 O mvb.d dln YENwt1 llcev. No 11988. ��y Hesapin Com1Y DAN bm ld- • .Itda'ld Lmbnvb., IIIf.0 P:( COLONIAL CHURCH OF EDINA SECOND ADDITION �9 5. 1/. E.. SE. ]l 1.111, R. 11 BR88OF BEAFMM m.M°�ifisT mlxiwdsy'ri°an L .... —YEN BY MESE PRESENTS MBI ID. ComW C-0 of EOM o MFn.xi1 —­T1 9vpvltlm, Ix pwnw, 11 IM fdlI.FP M-fto0 Pwpvly WW.tll F In. Cvmly 11 tt-11 5U1. of MF --bA ID wit WL 1, Nvb i MDNIAL d CM IY EDNA MST MdODN ww. 10 b.. ,od m0 plot- M MMIA1. WORCN a< EDNB SECMD Q01— m0 m.. ne.by EMk11. to lb. puNk 1v p blk Iv. Too— IIa OmF19. alto aunty .�Bmi. m .n1.. m No plot. k w wbw.lf .too Comkl — If EdhA o Ybm.wU Bm -ymfil oory Jp . m U. b1. 11 N. Sbl, 01 YFnx114 IM, CW..O Ux. —to to I. Ow- by 11. pope mr4 tnb _ my It - 2MO. Colloid Cbpd� 01 E—. o YlntlxolP M -p1D1 cvpvlllm. BF II. STOIC OF 1CIOFSDTA COIMR Q TM II, b9 FMrummt wx I— AWAdpd I—. m. Inb _OBI 11 2010. by M of C—Mt CIb1N 1f Ed 1 YFO.xta nm -poN — pmallm — lM lox 11 1t—ta m —11t 10. 1—p—r tw >.1t11c faun/. uFxwx W Y Dannlvlm Evb.. � Om� E. —it, M gal'blMlldl mmlwomta OyM.O m N�plot Mw�imnv w0 n. m/cll�j ml wlt F wl rvbM MA:. aI U 1 pbL INB! oll bbawpvlx vtl w.1 lutl.ym of Inds my OYaol .ups.itlm aW Ilwl l�l om a Otll Ikm..O Ad ovwp t1; — A Imi el N� Stal. el YWwe�� m IM wN. 1 RrNw vOfy Bwl W. Pool .x pepv.0 01 tM v K lb,- llplx0 1m0 Sm.P YFwamll l.kv�w Numbw 1J96B ST.iE OF IdBRS01.L y�2I- TMf�9 upwp'. vClbvl. wx — o.l.Opool 0♦Ia♦ nu Utb do, 1 V 2D___ bI OtW K RYN. 111�w0 �O Svxp. 1 if.lsy PW l—o,M —A oo— Q� YI — ENx b� Ng .� E NIL M.BIISDT. ( Ub tool d DdaeeL afladl p F Vl a W— m -- d —ooNod DI M Oly a .1 blm .1 1 g— vy 11 oo— m 1 — ®— b IN W 11 I—Apo I— mo IM —1, ..h—, 4gYI® s oo OO]0 m� Boo p— nx MINI _ dNM ­*1 to awe — aW tav dolbo.. m P-Mod by ubn Slol1 Swd.4 Sw SDSDS SIbG L NJI tJ OR l'Llltld 6 EdbA uNM60T. 1P By YoP. OIY dwb :—ATER SEANCES DIPMl101T. NpngF —1. Y..Iml1 I b000b, u Dy UBI lem poyo M F m_ am plv ytwo n1.. btm poM H Imo Om0.0 m UM pal Dd.e DO. _ Ovy of 2CL— a L — Camty N ®b BF D-1, SDRLEY d'OSIOL NewlyF CanIF Ybuemll wxml a Mfint :11 511wt. S.c SB>a.ss9 f19fi97, db Pod Im INrt aw1w1 uw _ BBr 11 nlm, P. cb— NauryF Camly SvwP BY mINR RECDRDER. H—Ip Canto. uiemlo I INS.bI cwYly Ud iM wIUF tops d CdDIPLL CMNW W [DN. 3CdaD .Cd11d! wo. nv0.0 F Inb Bllic� lob _ Ooy 11 m� Po _ 1'dpa gym. � Y'sled K CumIO. Caa11 Roo—bo B1 D-11 RLK INC. iN l�L • r � ��e�'� o }�• �u. mat: ., v a s�5 �a r�s - - - 1p1' \1 %r��; .T 6 r. WATERS LrVING W. ERS tf OF EDINA • 11 Renovate Pre FR ield Improve Quality Renovate prep -star hsseball held to match the quality standards of the caosting II We league lick) (new fencing, dugou tsseatmg, backs ups. turf and soil tmproveme u). New Park Shelter Convenient and Accessible �i fm The' ss a nerd for new park ,belle, that is elhcently looted for rt handicap accessrbil- and ent Locating for all. L the pak eshel— near the puking lot. adjacent to the hockey nnk, and adjacent to the child— play area allows for easy access and year - round ase Increase Access and Visibility to Parking Lot Utilizes Existing Parking Openmg up ac and vutbilay by thinning the underbrush of the uuded a will enhance u of the esrstmg nHstiost parking that is currently shared by the church and the park. leer —Uon of this Parking lot a recommended. Children's Playground Fulfills Desire for Creative Free -Play Areas Olinger Boulevard Little League Field Prep Field basketball Court (Full) Tennis Courts (2) Hockey Rink d / r Childmi5 Play Area J� Natural Play Area (using cut from sledding hill) Park Shelter C Parking Lot Paved Trail C/ Park Benches 3' Adventure Skate Loop Colonial Way eo_ ao a eo Provide a Hockey Rink & Pleasure Skating Area Improves Recreational Opportunity Awen- maintained outdoor skating rink is of high importance for park users. Thc new location of the hockey rink Is of preferred co orientation. We e mend tmpmved sub -soils and grading as well as new lights. An adventure skating loop is proposed as a furore option. Provide a Trail System Improves Accessibility and Provides Recreational Opportunity An ac —ble uad sysarm n of the most fundamental needo of the park the tntts will allow for easier access to park programming elements and can be uW.ed by all park users as a means to walk, ,on, in wheel through the park. Consider completing a perimeter sidewalk loop around the park for recreation and connectivity. a n Today. chddreni —sway is ohen ^ stymied by the play options they are grven. Adventure and tradluonal plavgro -1, can ufler a place for children to hide. r awl sc venge, create, and imaginer The I from the park's hill can be used to create a • uuraltaed knoll the ui—p -- free play with Traditional play T• egwpment and also utilizes the rxtsting adjacent wooded area Provide a Hockey Rink & Pleasure Skating Area Improves Recreational Opportunity Awen- maintained outdoor skating rink is of high importance for park users. Thc new location of the hockey rink Is of preferred co orientation. We e mend tmpmved sub -soils and grading as well as new lights. An adventure skating loop is proposed as a furore option. Provide a Trail System Improves Accessibility and Provides Recreational Opportunity An ac —ble uad sysarm n of the most fundamental needo of the park the tntts will allow for easier access to park programming elements and can be uW.ed by all park users as a means to walk, ,on, in wheel through the park. Consider completing a perimeter sidewalk loop around the park for recreation and connectivity. a n F- 0 eo — — - — — — — — — — - cy oc* olp ;�NN L --f- 2— — — — — — — — — — O1- Q -------- ---- uq --------------- ------- f1ii ----- R r ct Ul 15— 7 :523.39 GENERAL NOM FOR LAYOLM PARKM SUMMJW ZONING 1119-- zlz� 7V FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN SITE LAYOUT PLAN THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING THE-WATERS OF EDINA —N— L.11— P,.p—d S—. 11 .. mg - tk C..V. f7l.Ci-WCh..h.fEdi. C300 MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL JANUARY 4, 2011 7:00 P.M. OATHS OF OFFICE ADMINISTERED City Clerk Mangen administered the Oath of Office to Commissioners Joni Bennett and Josh Sprague appointed to terms of four years to January 1, 2015. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Chair Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Brindle and seconded by Commissioner Bennett for approval of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Housh, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF DECEMBER 21, 2010, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Brindle and seconded by Commissioner Bennett approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for December 21, 2010. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 7:06 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Scott Neal, Executive Director o e vo �y •.�1B�� REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. II. (HRA Agenda) From: Cary Teague Planning Director ® Action F-1 Discussion 11 Information Date: January 18, 2011 Subject: Restated Easement & Parking Ramp Agreement — 5013, 5017 and 5125 Vernon Avenue (City of Edina Liquor Store and parking ramp site and Jerry's Enterprises sites.) ACTION REQUESTED: Approve a Restated Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement, subject to any changes recommended by the City Council. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. is requesting that the City of Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority, as property owner of the Edina Liquor Store and parking ramp on Vernon Avenue, consider amendments to the existing easements over the City of Edina property and the adjacent Jerry's Enterprises properties. The purpose of the request is for Jerry's to sell their northerly parcel to Walgreens. Walgreens would then move into the Jerry's Hardware building and adjacent stores. Jerry's Hardware would move into the existing Olson Brothers space. (See attached documents from Jerry's Enterprises describing the project.) The existing buildings would be remodeled. The uses proposed are permitted uses in the PCD -2 Zoning District in which these properties are located. Therefore, no site plan review would be required by the Planning Commission or City Council. Attached is a draft of the Easement and Parking Ramp Agreements, as written by representatives of Jerry's Enterprises. The following is a summary of some of the requested changes to the existing Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement over these properties. The existing Easement Agreement grants access and parking between these lots. 1. An easement on the City property to allow loading for the Jerry's Northerly Parcel. (See Exhibit C ' in the Agreement.) This is an existing activity that takes place at this location. 2. An easement on the City property to allow the use of existing stairs, ramps, trash enclosure, storage and other lawful uses associated with the use of the building location on the Jerry's Northerly parcel. This easement also allows the existing fencing around this area to remain. These also are existing activities that take place in this area. (See Exhibit E in the Agreement.) 3. The draft Agreement eliminates the City's access to parking in the Jerry's Northerly Parcel, shown as a future Walgreens. This area contains 32 parking spaces. (See Exhibit C in the Agreement.) As a result, customers of the City's Liquor Store would technically be unable to park in these spaces. 4. The draft Agreement eliminates the City's access to the Jerry's South Parcel. 5. The draft Agreement provides access to the upper two levels of the parking ramp to users of the Jerry's parcels (which exists today), and provides the City with exclusive rights to the lowest level of the parking ramp. This is the current practice in the lower level, but is not specifically stated in the existing easement. In addition to the above information, Andrea McDowell, of Campbell Knutson, the City's attorney, has provided a "Summary of Easements Specifically Called out in the Original Jerry's /City /HRA Easement Documents." The highlighted provisions in her memo are not carried over into the new agreement." (See attached memo.) The above comments and were based on a previous version of the Easement Agreement. The proposed Easements included in this packet were received by staff on January 14, 2011, and include some minor revisions. Legal staff has not had time to review the changes prior to this report going out to the City Council. Legal staff will be at the Work Session and provide comment on the proposed documents at that time. Additionally, Jerry's submitted a maintenance `agreement on Friday, January 14, 2011., Staff again has not had time to review the document prior to packets being sent out to Council. ATTACHMENTS: Memo from the City Attorney Property Ownership Map Photos of the existing storage and loading areas Existing Easement & Parking Agreement Developer Comments on the proposed redevelopment of Jerry's properties Proposed Easement & Parking Agreements Maintenance Agreement SUMMARY OF EASEMENTS SPECIFICALLY CALLED OUT IN ORIGINAL JERRYS /CITY/HRA EASEMENT DOCUMENTS 1. Non - exclusive Public Driveway Easement. (See Attached Exhibit) • Granted to City and HRA by Jerry's • City has right to enter Jerry's property abutting Easement to construct, repair, etc. • Jerry's to maintain Easement including snow removal • If Jerry's fails to maintain in same condition as City Property or promptly remove snow, City may perform and charge cost to Jerry's with 8% interest, including all costs of collection for Jerry's failure to pay • Jerry's may relocate easement, per the conditions set forth in Agreement: • Notice provided • Must connect westerly portion of Tract C with Vernon and in location approved by City • Jerry's must pay to City reasonable cost of construction and deposit estimate with City • Jerry's must provide title opinion establishing ownership of relocated Easement area • New Easement must be placed of record at Jerry's cost • City will release previous easement upon compliance with foregoing 2. Driveway and Utility Easements. (See Attached Exhibit) • Granted to Jerry's by City for Jerry's Tract 2 • 2 easements for construction, maintenance, repair and use of driveway by pedestrians and vehicles ( "Driveway Easements ") • Easement for construction, maintenance, repair etc. of underground electrical power lines, water pipes, sewer, gas and telephone ( "Utility Easements ") • Construction, maintenance, repair, etc. of the foregoing easements (the "Work ") to be done at Jerry's cost and expense • Indemnification of City by Jerry's from costs, liens, claims resulting from the Work • Jerry's must provide estimate of cost of Work and deposit with City upon request • City may require relocation of the Easements on City Property: • Notice must be given to Jerry's • Jerry's must relocate within 90 days • City must provide easement document for new Easement location • Jerry's must pay all costs of relocation including restoration of City property • Jerry's must deposit security to cover relocation and restoration • No restriction on the number of times City can require relocation • Jerry's may not use Utility or Driveway easements for any purpose other than identified in this section of easement and shall not park vehicles on, place structures on, store property, in the easement area • City may place or construct buildings and other structure on, over and under all or any par of the City Property not then subiect to any Driveway Easement or the Utility Easement on City Property, even though such building or structures block or prevent use of, from the City Property side, any openings or doors into buildings or structures now or hereafter placed or constructed upon all or any part of Jerry's property, Tract 2. 3. How are these easements addressed in the new Jerry's easement document? • The foregoing easements are not specifically provided for in the new Jerry's easement document • The easements are generally called out in the new easement form: Jerry's and the City each hereby grants ....perpetual non - exclusive driveway and pedestrian use easements over and across those portions. . .which are now or hereafter improved or reasonably determined by the owner of such property to be necessary to be improved with driveways or sidewalks for access ... O The City grants ... to Jerry's ... a perpetual non - exclusive easement under those portions of the City Property required for the construction . . . of underground electrical power lines, water pipes, sanitary sewer, gas lines and telephone lines... [as depicted in Exhibit J] • The relocation provisions of the original easement are included only with respect to the Utility Easement and not the driveway easements under Paragraph 1 or 2 above. • The highlighted provisions above are not carried over into the, new agreement, although the maintenance provisions may be addressed through a proposed maintenance agreement that has not yet been provided. • The final bullet under Paragraph 2 above seems to be a key component that the City would give up under the new Agreement. EXHIBIT A C'<Ap OR' z rr Ali AF MUM ko z EXHIBIT B �,. � tea.. � . r � !!'' .�� ,! • �l ' s, , ek�k/5r�teA�� AF y��•F�,i��a� ��.� `+ - L /. `, �E° ��! ! ���i 'I 1'Lp _ i��, !• b., � 1 + 1• - �� may- ' M k •��,7x... C �� �� y �i �' � c C ° �' � a,�►;� A d-�;� Ev ESA o l � L "' A. � � ,• rte• AttlN SAC€ttrl y� G ®r; I - . r• N L [' t` 1 ar;, ' o - '�.,� �z _ � • e_• �'+..� .,, � � . ��: � � � � jam, _ .. _ . i ,q t At# MW V. b O y l+ O .0'.I 1a0 �•.N 7 O� ..rO'•.• NFS r pp tl i 4� 7 U N.ep-,Tj" Q !N FI� •� O O.� O' '� .N N•y r h., Y - �, O .'� .. � i�• >. 773 4N -N N �7 h N. N Yf 'h �..•iN yf _. .i 1 �,�j .I t w� ru. - �r -. /V1 N. Is�,_ VI of .N N �� N N V1 `N ✓Wt .' I NI 11� I I I I I I �E. L--- - - - - -- �I I I h L- - - - - -- I L- - - - - -- I ©` NORTH I • BUILDING L- 1 - - - - -- ' I / O L - - -- -- I 6'- - - - - -- I I I , A MID L� I I' 1bTILDING I QQ BUILDING I f' I � I L� soul H 1 I �' I i I I I I na.a.,.m.l p .n,M1:`,rMa.mp.r.•11..a.,m.. nu.a an. m.n�mn+w ra,erw• m. �4 o•r.ti Mm'• pnm.p rAe. u arl••en, nm.•u• s r•u.p •man CON � Jon Kohler, TACT SEMPFR DE WMEW Su01 1115 e6 s. fin. 51.11 105 c'.- MI ... P N. Mlnna.PM 55401 PM10ne: fill- 331 -I S00 COUNTY /CI'rY: •HENNEPIN COIJ N�1r CfiTY O F E C7 0 0�R A NO o0 a a. 4I I SEAL I INEH . 40 FEET 1 REVISIONS: 1 uamnmu VICINITY MAP „PROJECT LOCATION: S ® U 7 VERNON AVE. 5 PID #2811721310065 PI°� 6511Ifi,pn CORNERSTONE LPI N O•Sl/RVEYING. IBC EASEMENT DETAIL SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS EASEMENT DETAILS tiw na•+•.nwp pr m lm. m a•m.m n MwM ndW w•r lamhmpl,Ipr. N/mnlwu•nrt,•m - w. o...�nn..l....n.aa.an. CD „fib .. ... ® .w irmsmpwr. E-, naw.mm.w l�wpmaaM mpa•n. n14n..m iR..� rt.nentp 1M I,Al.�rll.wn m Ianmaw uu Nu^Fla1u ,wr, e.m., 1.mI,. . rl.m w.m.,m•. n.p.m.w.n na.a.,.m.l p .n,M1:`,rMa.mp.r.•11..a.,m.. nu.a an. m.n�mn+w ra,erw• m. �4 o•r.ti Mm'• pnm.p rAe. u arl••en, nm.•u• s r•u.p •man CON � Jon Kohler, TACT SEMPFR DE WMEW Su01 1115 e6 s. fin. 51.11 105 c'.- MI ... P N. Mlnna.PM 55401 PM10ne: fill- 331 -I S00 COUNTY /CI'rY: •HENNEPIN COIJ N�1r CfiTY O F E C7 0 0�R A NO o0 a a. 4I I SEAL I INEH . 40 FEET 1 REVISIONS: 1 uamnmu VICINITY MAP „PROJECT LOCATION: S ® U 7 VERNON AVE. 5 PID #2811721310065 PI°� 6511Ifi,pn CORNERSTONE LPI N O•Sl/RVEYING. IBC EASEMENT DETAIL SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS -�,-, - - -�=� ,,�, Y\ '. � , ,�' t . - , ti ,: � -- �' r, � � .,t �� � f �"� : , . . . . . . . . . . . "Wwl r . . . . . . . . . . "Wwl q = -- �,',�`,_ :.;.:.- .:,:4: -:w.' ``k:•..S :r. vrlss is ;.fi?... .•`,','; '`".:1d?'' --a c•a. -:i ": - 'r .. -46: •rc�"T' ,.¢ o-±+•,• 1a � Vii-:. �A::� � wt? 'r.r.,: :.• . =i:'aA'r': • A,. .�y��.` '[• ? , ;}?G :MAW;dfG R-T V!!ll4�yr4/(F"'�zzz��d , , • . :y.•: : S f � +l r.{, °�.y.: 'SU '- . ?y viii p � f:] ' W tna a as, of',:February oration nx ai.... x4mong :'thk °:O n y: td ii ota. inalficipal`: core n o1? rrr AMIORT- 'o� . ' ::.�,. - ' �IJiHA•. 14t4F.SpT�,•. _b• �'oel�*s- ga�:�:�ib aaal •oorpotate..Under: th¢ ;•.- :IaM :'of '. t i ti '': .' I �e�ora::(tbc' $Ap) and jgi c 4 6 : ys •; '., '!"B3tPRIS$S, 'IN . ` -a' eittnesota'•corporatioa ( "•Jerry! s°) i, RWh,"• the City is the owner of certain property 104atet, tp the 1;4ty,,•and Ijag?]i'y'. 4as'cribed on Zxhibit -A (the WHERRAS.r :V-a'fi'j►'!s. is. the gwner of certain property.' _ located In. the•. Ei��: ai�8 :1'ege�xy described on xxhibit- B' hereto t a. BRA have entered into , o t -act for 1?i tat ..3iedeva7�ap �t dated the date hereof '�..;''' . . °�5 ^".Redeve3opraen -t : :... WHEREAS, pursuant to tits Redevelopment Agreement, r; o ar 'ir agreed to--ccnstxugt on jef`ry Property certain improvem -n.ts ('.tie: t�ri� ste.- Improvema7ss ") comprdsing an OgproimeteZy i;.2'' �gt�are . foot onit+6story: a«ditiori to an -4;• Xista�s'g : h 8= `'s .?V rdxImateIy 40,479 kuare root cO=OigY4j- 1k£4ft'tion to existing office and comai aia , 3, ` ;ee st an 15riaiee� connecting ; b� ". lose �i3ti -a' o=y. 'fic,' anfit - .g4s3eci'a1 a�iditaon with each the_ p_ir a ," c1f� % f; ' �zt of the itR.A public'. ; �; ' ', ,•� ?p! ro�etitients' ,(hevi- -q -q ' j -qa :'fi w .eiid reagv A Surface ',: - .al....Along. vtarnon -Avenue pgyay. y�.'C���r..a�`�s�'�,eriari� .faef'Titi:es•:. g�;�dirse('r - `, i:•+; 3.. "an'd - -1 i" h- - +-y -workt . ends..= • . . .,d; -p... u -84 t)t to . te h` e : i I "'e§t. "to oc#pm� een.t- t.. hAe g City eo tc r»n tt t_:€iis''tha'C r' p cl? 7r 4.1)} £ rbteteiifs ,(the •a - VO- 2eaiel,: �tricin %41 =►uble �t�psclyp�e'�, :iit.x :p 9 ' : >�,' gdi'tlC' :titb :iigass-��i :fig. :neap`s a.,$ f :AF .. '601P.;'o intt0X'''Z :�'jt'oa�r}y�R'`y a�aii�itsr� sae: ' cd. . .,pia #�•.i3e; :3i$oos�t o� .cl�sit�a�lei :`�fii� �. :•. :�"_ :. �+w�t �; � iii }� @. °- �2ei���Ot1�G: M' �' •�y: ✓is% > :'..LS' .. .. •.. ..••y^ ;rRii°F�f�� :.tlZ T..$• ]!�li 4SP' :ti.q ri, '`' `� "��• • �. semen Y. ' S' fE'.i <<h':. :�:., •-_ •• �At4�:'. �Q�.r •= �Fr` ec�sis3e� :`�:�.. :.the�p�'etn�s�a .. �,, .. and . tpe mu p t t hereby g ovail"t 8s '`: • :. _.. . F. _ } : :.•� ��.'•.� - iii: r` Si •:.^i:. ,fiw• � }`ti_:. :u •.. •.. _yC. -'� '• + :� ... t• :•i: h,~�•'•1. .. : -" �.. .. .:..._,.4. r: � .Y4n -;,t - Q�'_'.' %tee ,• -9 iYt'.^..'h�w w' �: :V'- tia•"��!i �YS'.•'• '. f�: _.•'.:.. _::.:. , ivtiro'�1V:: • •' ,... :.y;:._ '"•_ "':v'�'':.5�-'� 'J�'.u.•.na.:iw"d•.: � :I :.....•._ -., r.•..t "- a i .'.,:� ' �:. ' 1s�s'til ::' r•er�'s���n8- Maintenance. � =� . �s: p�' •;: eitr 6a] i the cost of the HRA `iR$:dinhe.emiiitnance building /gel .y public. Imprsjiie5 age•. d6 'site.p'repai ion (Excluding demolition), it 'design, eng a =iiig: legal; inspection, and consttuetioin :--costs-.and sha11 Qe:determined by'the-HRA upon completion .. bf. tie wiA 'Public 3fnpisovements. The City may -levy a special aaderi sr..ent upon Jerry's Property, Tracts 2 and 31 pursuant to the rrocedures. established•by M. § 424.061, or any succesgor ' ;;:...: statute, for .said 20%. Such special assessment sha3 ti be gay0b.le; incLl'uc?irig interest oti the unpaid principal portion J' thereof from ti6+eAo•.time out$tanding at the rate of 8.3% • per. '..ahauku :iri fi.f to .611 (15 ► equal annual. installments, ' B,,.. Tefty s. shall repair and 'maintain- the parking. ramp• whi-.:h , .SV`gart of .the BRA Public lmprodements, and the � ?• driveways; wa13Gt�ays;• jeflesttlan pridges and landscaping ::,•Y ' appurtenant 'i l es`etb; `'Ii3cli >iXri without limitation, s �moval •• og snore ice • and: ckbrls,, sealing ' for . salt erosion, caulking, 'striping, pai'nt:.ng, :rel',smpi h ; and to perform repairs, except '. 'Tf• sttuctural repairs:• 5'erXy's fails to perform its maintenance ' obligations'hereundek, the -Cjty may levy a special assessment .'.• ~' or assessments, upon the Jerry's ...,)party, Tracts 2 and 3 ' ursuant.to the-procedures established by M.S. § 429.061, or any succii�sor statute. Such special assessment or assessments shall be payable-.ib'one or more installments, as determined by the City; "toge.�.h6r-•- Fiitf'' interest at the rate then established ry .ths City. _ NeiiRdd -':the 'C3:ty nor the tixA are required to restores or re_,paik _pal.d pAAin%* re1ap if, in the. opinion.'of of the City yr . the HRA,..• it e&ameq uhusable because damage, ;• de9t> uotiorr , ' ai Cieacenee:, -or. arty other reason. If the City or. t b HM ,ma'in'tains insAkanae on said parking ramp, any insurance.prnisdds receivoo as• •a. tesult of 'damage to or destruction 'of. si.h .arking- ramp'.will be used for repair :a+ or rep]:acemant-i if - sufficient, but neither the City nor the _FMA Ure recix4ied to- main.ta4n any such- insurance or to repair -� or restore pArkiAg ra�ap .the insurance proceeds are ,said •if i neuf f icient t6 pay tt�� : snt:� re cast thereof. 2.. •basements A. - Codkstru?,'tion -Jerry's-•and the City each hereby..':''' ' .. grant,;' bArgaln;.; ti a• m 4nd convey -to one. another temporary,. je -.r X repi` �exolusive !enaefits:•.bye'r.'3►'.s ' ;.Property for the benefit �� "r_. `=•s of the City • 1A;f-' he-:OA' e�fy� gv�r•:' he" City Property fole the � - -• benefit of Je "s;R . Q ei; e-vpon:=&b portion of -the City .: Propert;• and�"tI;7e", a ?Ga''`s :.; srQ i9rYgi a ; taay be reasonably nece$sarY_: •:y - a ;. for the purpose of arsris�txuang tea :l�,tivate •impYGVemeeyte _ "� and the Public T_mprovcamegt ,..:`.lv l • oon 't uctip :ti bail be so as to cause as li *.,r1e: }nco txeriieride ` Co .8rd Ante rugtioh �" of the use o €. the pxoty'":; t`4e other party. r • '�,, .- ,. ..y... _ :'. ..ht.•L�...•, '..Ltr.'•1i. �•r. ... .,A ^� A.��Y ��'�i::'.. ::.i'i =i' ,. .. ..r °: fir• N4 a' %ak �`: 'i'.L . •: q•�;}.1 . . .::i7�;1iL•:: •-'�'u37�- %a_li..v. `�4.• �1.:.,- v- �•- K,tw`— �e�..�.. k = ..7.' i:M.. .. M. .'i s:' •� ' '•�: .•. t: S. ' Pds; iah,:BZ`�ir EasmenC. The City hereby . ::.5cairt's` 'bar invy. , guars:: $nc , conveys to Jerry's, for g t•: the : beaef it df'.: Tsa r: '?gM, of ; . t:' 2, a non- exclusive ° #a` ein�?it:'.td 'cons rt�c ,,r s�ca3n a . pn ' and reconstruct the ' ' ��adastrl.an •�r�dg : •ct�n��ctiiig °.tlie: mult�. =story cffice.•anc� _ erciai aBdiC,.oik s' pa rt. of" the Private Improvements tfi ;th: eaci� leve•1: q - .the perking ramp which -Ss part of the SP.2i'•.Fubli47 Zttip'rO�iCfi1�[�tS:' (the_ "-Pedestrian •Bridge Easement ") = c o:•er that portion--of :.thw Ci *y Pr erty siaown and des- ibed = t .-on the ,$cawing attachdff-bereto as'•.Exhibit C. Jerry's shall ari liravide and'mata L.I. A connection from each pedestrian bridge Cb: the .Dtt iidihe gerty. : 'on' �s.ry's:•.Prg.Tract 2, to 'whi.ch each edssti�n. Sri a .,i"s': coruyaCted;.' and shall provide. ; access.. to such -� uildin ' al:;t iiri;ng all-times when such buildings are a .:. open' to the rubdt•, The. Pedestiain Bridge Easement shall continue on�.y so :.fong e . said' parking rartro shall exist. ; s. a a1a bR;lt piC.ri bli' gdr, and shall hold 'the City <<: ?std the HRA 'has ile l : i Yp4r1 a7i$ igdemnify it against any and :.all loss, cost,; ftiiag.�? _ card - expense, including, without. llimaita� ion, Injii y ,or ..damage to'-�ossons or property: 'reasonable attorneys' 'fees: and .expert witness:.,Eees, and travel associated . therawith, arising out''o�.or iri Corioeotion with said':pedestrian s•':> bridges, or anv claim or '$image pe- .elai*n to arise out- of the inotallation, design, construction. G, maint,onance. of said z � diiit�ia-n bxidges. :F . t. A. ; rcib2 'i'o',nriyetvay,,..Ese�aent. Jexry's her, g�caats, bar �s, quatc'Ia�Ms ,an , corked s �e •City and the. i$iA, . ff= the benefit: of : :. the " y l!ro�tierty, . a perpetual ' non - exclusive i;4 -foot wine easesren't:'•fo�t pubiic cyiveway .purposes (tho. "public gxi.veway Easement ") oilf an6 . over. that portion of• the 4.irry `s obletty, Tract ";Shown aha deif6kll -ed on the drawing 'attached . • Exhibit ,C. The - Public - Driveway Easemeii� is hereby a.• made sub ji ct to, the : following terms : rind- conditions: The' City shall have the .xight, to enter. or . use• -portions of jeMI a, Property ;, Tract I adjacent.. to' the • pnbl c - .Driveway .Sagemont Area t� : sii ..'l�elocetsed Public Driveway fit, Ftse�ient� Area (heid rra'ftet' d6fi:ne�i) 'for tihe•: purpose -•of' ,s ' x$conbtsuctsng or' 'rp dzilveway rocp,tao on ?.' the ublic Drivow+ ty Piasjement A kt<or.:Iteio ptdd' Public. Driveway Easement -Area; 1 �idVlded, 'tiot�eil ;•;, ie ' no 'aurTos •.ai - patters shall be construtiid cpon thi~: Pir3 c' D�ei way '8a enserit Area :(or then AeTa,-hidd- Pub13'a D�`# eio i t' Arend by. the ^; elt .'scx 1Gag as tfie Hz'cspeXty:` tiW`g of # e Public :0: J-v way Easement lgrea' fps': n °,` yp ,eEF� ubiio Driveway , Easement Areal, ari�.,•f0k t' �ib1e .,, 3s used for parking and driv- zAi y >ff ojk .. ( l Je+; • o a c , 3 t) s3+Gla ;�:i iodliuj .removal of snow from, the Fhii9l is pt'i:S!; r, aVjWii - A"a for the then Relocated Public ar #vcway. %a .�; "� !�i 8 :' t3 xpe. >, .iii 4v�'z.:y .�•- pis`. ��r+;:__ _ •<a.anrs�'': :4,.. .. r I,f JeriyOa fails. Or. refuse to maintain 'tbe Public Driveway Esseieent Arse ''(ox .. ie:.,+Qhsn 9.ubatitute- lasament Area), in at least tine same • ebridi•tifs ••the: City. _ #roperty is then being :N ywaintaisse8, Or prcmi]y.:tb 'aiave''en: therefrom, then the ;S _ C2tj►• rosy do so 'a*id' c2ia`rge :tie'cost''t°hy�reof, with interest at' light percent ('81) 'per. " ;a i(utq tq::.7e�t —s , and the : same ' :, b •dye on. di mea�• td� ?':artd' h °Cite itiay•.recover the.:same ir--'a civil' action, iiif'T3tiicii Doss Jerry's also st^a11 pay all Qua of collection, iri4vdin4 =edso'nable attorneys''fees. " (3) Jerry 's"may.xelocate the Public Driveway Easement to another location on Jerry's Pri5perty, "_Tact 1 then owned by such ,owner (the ° Relocatea Publ ie Driveway Basement AreaP ) _. UP on written notice to the'City,'and upon compliance with the. following terms 'and ".cond!:tkons: • ,,r (a):: 'Jerry'at With such written -notice, ..shall grant .end .+ itCldim : ;t'tie' City, by written document, at? .'r a nOMbnt :Ap a0d•• tuner:' !!1•a8• Relocated Public Driveway Easement A. 'f ull a ;4c u A•.a» iii. ;racordabje form, containing. the ., '. s•3m0.; terms and c6ndiis: U.;asy et. zit .in this Paragraph 'C a • ::: ; ;. {inctvdi;<g, .brit ndt, 1�f tsX: the "ris�ht to thereer aft again _ ='. relocate+ e Publird:•Px4vewi •Laae:i"t to 'anothei location th or locations in Jeffry'' g...?x6pex k�► r ''fact 1. (b) The Relocated Driveway Basement Area :e shall be on and over a strip of laird' -' least twenty -four a (24) feet''wide Rbstaily and of Tract • C, Registered L.¢nd Survey No. 1.307. 4 - i e$::? Registrar of Titles, Hennepin - ,#h1a• County, • Minrresoti,•, i ttt* Verrivn • i venue ;:.and in a location then reason* abl Y 4p7p tht�l : q tY>ta .Ciz f ... ` . W (c Z.'pay ca the City, is ca h; . City's reasonable; :t'imat� ;:cli ..he, cost of oonstrvctinq •' ' :100*and over the locate, `.Pa�'a1ic ; Ii�r3 mew, y . EoshaWt • Area ail ?'y 'impravamenb$ then Lasemenf .Area or :, i�e dcated. ubiic Ai- 34eway" *pop ent Area, incitiding, but. not x ``= #3tpited thy,. base n►atexia�'r ' €s;ui8aing,, .ourb, gustier, God4ing, :t abd landsdaping. .Sdi,di'estimat 'aha11. be revised frW. time to t, as wfltk prog�•esse, aad any inerea�s in such estimate sYiali be deposited, alt - ti$.,City: by 36tr,-'y'sr in easli,. on ft%aad, . and if not ofl;: 4epg` e3 "d the amount .demanded and •peYeent' not deposited shall test at eight. ;'8�) per arisu�jt Ikaih date of de tp d ..Witil depossited:; .4F d . tlie. Clay . may ' °ire: ° >v9 i�T?iiCh m-cogar true same a l ao�3 oa 9, in evbtit,. Jerry' • shall 'a'lso- LSaS► all C ®Sts of .collection, ircluGirig rearsonab3e . :: :. attorneys," frees i:e,. ...• . ' (d).-:, `Jeiry a shall ..deli or - to the Minion from a aia . E rii1'. rs:s8apali] y acceptabia to the cityi , � , -, • reasod .to tlia :Ci i. I�isd'_ 3atsd. as :of •a tiler, Burr+ nt ate;' .z`' T'`' _..�' *.?-_ ,...L_...:::d:' ••s:'• ..,.. ` ...�. •..•.::.... a3''de5.. "�,yN'�' tic':.° ;�,_4.�:5"•:L:�`'rt.rr. _._.''4.' : "_�'. _r.�s...__.•_• -._.:. - _..�,_ :.a%: _ e%,iddnciqg that ffer-ry I's., ft. "the tmo?iei the Relocated Public Oriyoviay Badem :free viii fid -CIL�br of all liens 'and ancumbrahces; (OY -,Thk',-conveYafi4jP df:the Relocated Public !$riveway paseaenb.Aizqc d.f..' d Jerry's expense. bje., a(p record at Xp .qd. all of the foregoing terms and conditions -69- -this Paragraph C, the City shall &live•'io Jerry., ii.-a­rliily executed, recordable quit-claim i-eed.•rcieasing all = of, its right, title and interest in and t:6 +he Public Driveway Casement Area, or the then Seloc - ated Prblic'Driveway Sasemeift.Akea, to be released. The Public Driveway Easaaent•Area, or Relocatt-d Public Driveway Easement Area, may be released and relocated pursuant to this Paragraph C 49 often as Jekty's may rqc#z*re.. D. Driveway. Md Utility Easements. (1) One City -do6s Hereby grant, bargain, quitclaim,' and convey tf- JerkY'.I6,';tQ 'the'- benefit of Jerry's Property, Vieaqt 2* perpetuaiL.:nop--pexclutive easements for the purposes -6el;n4 stated antizo"I"eri.- those portions of the- City Property - ilow (a) Tao-separate easements for the construction, re'dtinstruction, maintebabcs, repOir, and use of a driveway fox-pedestrian and vehicular passage ,...'re "Driveway Easements*), o!4'and over those Ocrii •.of ihii:mty Property showri'and ddscribed on the. 4iiwing-, attached hereto as Exhibii. D. (bl' construction, -iuAin.tefti t of uncierground electrical reconstruction, g! repa r poweir lines, water. pij?bs, 'dahItjary...-s­- gas lines, Amer pipes, lity., aind telephone liois (6d.. i3utl, Easeffientu)p under th4t iidrt: %of -the City -y.-ty*.-i3hokn.;a�d-*-�'4scrtb.ecI on'-the- .drawing a#t4ched hereto ag axb�bit• D., (2 ) The Driveway Easements and Utility Easement; -are hereby made onbject. "io the followi-ng texios and conditions: (a.) All. - conatrudilt W4 - `•ec6iiotruction, A. —A 42 a. && - A a A- thb Utility Easement an bj76%.1-irewayjon the,'Orivmway Easements (the "Vot 'shall be done." thi 00,10'066V and e)a�dftq6 of Jer Czy* -Ith-joizitly- 4�66 severally Agieo ry.. so. an to hbld the City,.- and its all' :a'nd futurO­ owrierip and occupiers. 6r.--t-h from anti in'damnifie'd- agai6gt age ."6r 0 ord b-Y. keoi;iaub to OnY*.--ami"­ 'or" dingip but D% ii1olitdivil; att 6 r Jiid t4o, too or Materia . 4 Mon3 liens filed or clainis.,igailpii. a 6i any, i�g p :City % Fk., ■ ::Property, axisio :- .oubrjof;•'. ©i''-dla- med -.;t0 have arisen out of, r; ;..�.. -the W6rk'. Al'1 .4�Ci k: PiaTl bb;3biilg' so. as' to cause as little Uu as. possiblei'�it:tidheite - t0•'4,ficl ;ii{errugtion of the use 6f': the City Propxy:': - '•' f�?eakiiig -any Work, Jerry's . • :+ shall advise the Ci ;y, Pr0,0dijy;, Owl d '_'.(1he term "City Property Owner"' shall meri-- the,ord :QWnr�r•. o£ any portion of the ''Ci:ty Property •aubject•:iq .an,eaaemeitt-;gxanted by this Pararaph D ;- Ca which is, such owner :as of. the t.ime when any work or other' =,= a� "tivity re_lat0e.'.to that easement is to be done pursuant ZIP bex'eto)•of the extent of the Work and the estimated cost "r thereof, and tfiq`-City Property Owner, at its Optiun, may " r3gEiire that Jerry's, as a ^ohdition to commencing the Work, ftrst•deposit with-the City Property Owner security, in form, subst"i9e and in dun;., reasonably acceptable to ;he City Property ;Owner, -to 'Insure that the Work will be complete$ ; and that' the cost.,.t ibrebf `will be paid in full. Any waiver � bX'the City ProperrX Ot9Aer of, or failure by the City Property. , Owner to''insist- qt; • ,6oinp- 11apce with, the provision's of this ` . Su- paragraph- D(I '(b)-, nq .matter how often, shall not be deemed' ' to be a. waiver df 'tkie .right 'to insist on compliance with a'•' the provisions of -this 04sagr4ph in connection with any :subsegiient Work. ; yQ =E: (c) _° City property owner may require Jerry's P =.• to relocate one or both Driveway Easements or. the Utility :[ Easement at its sole co6t'and expense. to another location on the-City Property then owned by e:��h City Property Owner "y ;Aldh other logati,on is hereinafter called the "Relocated Easement Brea ") on-'-the following terms and concitionst • (i) ..the Drivewa br 'Lttilits Basement concerned " �• shad lie xeOi;ated upon notice given by the City i+igerty owner to Jerry's, which ponce may. be given a* any time and without `• "f reasFii� rjr Catisa :thcYsfor. - . ,.:..(ii) xn the event notice- is given .to Jerry'= pursuant heret6 with respect to one or both `• Driveway Easements or the Utility Easement, Jerry's shall hive'such-time as is• reasonably necessary with'the prompt exercise of due dfXigence:Cfl • relocate the Driveway or Utility Hasem:it t concerned;, but.,_ in any event, not 1" 014e tfian n io6ty (PO) days from the giving :,•.. of such Ootice.. "• (iii) ThO City .Prgpe Mmer, with any such notice '• :�r' giyet}:'pur�iaali' •tret6.,• >:etiall ,grant, and quitclaim do : Jerry's, .b itteiv" ument, a.,.easement on ail over the ite.Lodated Easement Area. _. .. . ,.,.. ,. .. .. i_.•..••7a -... .?'LSD.. _.. ;�lt<li�Ca.`: C•.•',ti+ ♦w - "y' .. _ —_e _ - ■ recordable form, and conditions 48 as.. to the Driveway Easement , udi ot' limited to, 'the right �eway see. th'4 pjiOwner to thereafter or Utility. concerned � -Ah'd*!jW4loca.%ed,- ii. gement Area to* atn.ther Aoat, q&--dt lgoat the City Pippexty), But: -4i4iii!An�q, ihe''Efien Rdlocated Easement Areir':.And each•such Relocated Easement Area on and over a.strip of land no lebol th'i3n. twentyT-One feet vide and connecting Srbokiidi 'Amenue :1 in the city ,of Edina with the,biist-bouhdari.t line of the Jerry's Property, Tract.Z, but.otherwise in any such location loq;ttions on the City Property as may be1:de9ix:ffiit_ed by the City Property Owner. (iv) V 'ptciaptly shall pay all costs of zel.644' 4ng—the Driveway or Utility Basements c�nci•id, including, but not limited to,, Ehei'.i6A-,o,f restoring all poritions of the 4et fty- fzM ..which the - Dtiveway or Utli*-ty. Zdsomont t :concerned ' is ni&ied to as r las-Y*Vi!4.the 'condition 'it was in bhiahi work was done thereon pursuant (v) Agiihirl -fifteen (15) days of receipt of written -notice given pursu'ant to clause -(i), above# herein, Jqgry.!6'shall deposit with the City Property:donei security, in form,.substance 'fLi­- 4U­ ably acceptahlb to the and siM*6u i re on CLfy'Pr'-oP'6rtY"*OWOerV, to insure that the calocktion. and restoration work is completed bSr Jerry ti, - iind•thait all costs thereof - are (vi) . Upon the expiration of ftinet-. (90) days fteli Ob. recording by -either the City Property qe Ok. -.4k- Jeri for the Ylis of the easement f . 4 901000 O,.s,MdemeUt Aiva,` 4L21 of thq..right, " " A ti,�.20*, -and y's to 'use ;&1X f. or any .jiart;-'6fAbe City:.irc&erty other than (and.su ocatiori pur6Vai*.:hVikito) sha expiry rt r _bilt* :id hi. act 'his' party Aieret9i..., agrees tA operty owner, on' .. ... th h­0#P`1Riti& as herein pit"idod quitclaim Oeo.di �xqhtf title, and interest . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 7. of- i4iry s iii :' and -to the City Property except 4�-: -4.ovd:.Provfaid,' 'but such right, title, -nt:ito -s shall terminate Versuani h n6t' wi; hstanding failure -'-ior refq§aI.'of 67nots to give such quitclaim {vii) -, C who Ity. Prope3rty Omer may require relocation of oft6 or b66'.Driveway Easements and the utility Easement pursuant hereto from time to gimp 'without restriction as to the number of-tim'es .4.uch relocations may be made, and sack locatioh on. the City Property to which 4n.y.su.ch easement is relocated from time to time �:*shal)-'66 included within the phrase ':11Aelocat&d,13asemi9nt Area" for. purposes of thi-s . agkeemezit. (1) JNeith4i..,1'dk'ry1's_ nor any future owners or occupiers - -of any or a4i of­O1et­ry,-'s'Property, Tract 2, shall use the tit'�l'ity..F,asemertt'.'*d'*r'..aj3"'y'*.."'orl#dii4Ly. Easement, as any thereof In4y 'from time ' original and relocated positions), for'ah�k�urbqse 6 ' thii--Lhan-as herein- set forth, Agd'specificalfy shaill not 1krX­viPbicles on, place structures 0 any kind on, or store any property, material, or equipment of any kind whatao--ver on, any of•0-1-1 easements. The parties hereto further understand and agree that the City, and any suture owner of ail.' or any part df the City Property, may �Iace or consteuct•buildings and other structures ch., over, and under all cn�-tdhy part th!aXity Property no I t then subject to any Driveway Zasem iA:It-_A:�e Utility Eaczuentf as 'dny, thereof may then exit '_.Rnr heir orlgrinal ox relocated positional- on the City '-such buildings or structures block ->r prevent. City Property side, any openifigs or drm.,rs.'it -to bui1d-in.g*p;-.­ov'. structures now or -hereafter placed or: cqns -rui:%t6d -u&f- . 1 Ai any • paj;L of Jerry's Property, Tract 2. -This -;Aragkaph is .4r.tdrided as *a clarification of, and not in. '4ai-y- v79&,'y': as .a restriction on, the right -of the owners of 'the dlty'- Property to.. use the City Property in any .,waY such Owneri'cleem- AaMrAble.that is not' inconsistent with .2, the easement ri-gprz[..-4ereby granted. 8. 14utu2j• Driveway j: Parking-and Pedestrian Use '-JAI M J4rryls and'thq*City- Hach hereby- grants, baggains, .'..Vi,tclaims and conveys to ono--A#O;th6r-perpptua1 non - exclusive 146way, parking.: and pedeftfi`di)-cruse •.e4jelAgntsr over 'and across hose portions. 4.: •rey 3 Property kebt, I and * the City y rich are now or--here4vi6' 'improved ,. or reaBoriably t6%i ,,Sy, L pr of 'the-proper ty concerned' to be necessary be improved, with driveways, sidewalks or parking. spaces r V.v4,4 R V. t CAM, t iocm gh ly. -the.:"'W 500-,i p" ewA ea e M-4 t e.= es I�zdl of" �dh- juh6.*, 4, 1:975 4i:-D,oO; tb A moi7tgageas bV.Ii -be--. V#i5t. ms RA 7 �b "Y ocumen ap Al -�%� c V e ht � P ­7 n. c000ltFf,g �Vl_ D �emkOrclsiiz*-­, AU Wnuary -i vzi. -j; 'K fY--fh'd,-.'jjXikfng.,;tim x, whic h is:* par 6r.'. ­tha 'knvi' zpan p: Uti A nfpfOd 1. m.' -'.. ", Y.., ;t;y t "'ati #;rgg r a!ph t...:ghi4. .rmt 'ba" _15 th p6it re 0., the - -ether -oe-*-t6:.be ltable:, rty h RIRPPFFF ­V t1W. 914 Xvj. %SAL:-. jTe y, s-:,- ere y -.IC on.. vans. 0 -.0rddd el- m m t6 Tdrt on s +. ;Ciis;Satiori d 1 an ojjL'- th sL merit i; -pn 4c" d '6 ­2` - vbo_ r-iit::- c p- re Ar . . . ..... . �� °,;Iu:�a:::r....° ._....c_..:'J . .. ,... � .- .r �.t -... �: :':;'7 ca. •�.: ._.... ... .:. -s. .�... .. ...N'. _. ._.��.: ._. '.:i'. t'':.4 ..3�vF;;^:�ta�w„• ^''N' - - • �. -;: a">• - :4-i.r :-y:,n:�"�'f ..Z. �. - ,+ . - i n 6. TeiMiiiration'af. .'Basements. Created Hereby. Each "~A' Marty, hereto agree' -s t .a. and $ek ver a quitclaTm dead,, `�• in.,rsi`'ard4b;.0 form, =.to: ajjy property as to which any easemeent, ` hereby. has ber_K''termi gated, such deed to be for the purposes of evidencing of record the termination of such' - easement. The recording costs of 'such deed shall be paid '£ 4y the grantee tt,�rei.n . . .7. Doc'uaientatibn cf Basement Locations, To the extent easements. • are y: •grante -are not specifically defined, - i� :pr,'ars: erroneousjy' definedr with respect to location, Width ' trr, ele "vation, an t "•l 2r'eto may prepare and document such V *01 Y p 'descriptions, • d�scrlptions; • or' i 66- adau � te.. and each' party. hereta agrees 'to 'eMecutd* .mod: deliver slich documentation, iri: ret nr`�abla fot& :_ Vc4, Xtjceipt by each such party of :< i r,priibn' reasiikrably aceepteble to such party that the eiisaripi-ione, are accpiate, complete, conform to, and are caiisi.ateri ,frith, th*i 'pxo�risioa9 of this Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement. :=,; 8. Hnitaum Interference. ^" , parties hereby shall i always exercise us o. a r,respective easements amd rights hereunder, reasonably and .fin• such manner as to cause the �. lsas.t po's'sible intpL *glthtbnee 'Under the then circumstances with. the u%e and.'e'�rjvyme�kjt_- ,py:-the other paxties and persons :_ . -: who have the rig�at.'to .0 - -or- -are, subject to, such easements, =; o€ their respective prerties. `.. 9. Notices,.., All #Oioesti or uemands required or :�.= f, perwitted to be 41VEn under pr' pursuant to this Easement an-d Pkiking_Ramp Agreement'..liaLl be in- wrissng and shall be deemed tp be given °when delivared personally to the party, or any officer of the ,partly: 'to which notice is being g_ Win, or.ahen deposited in• the [3nfted States •mai.l in a sealed e. =velope, with registered or ce'iiified mail; postage prepaid thereon, ! : addressed to the parties' .fit;' the follow1mg addresses: If to the City{ at 4801 W ®st '50th Street t'1 Edina, Mi.hr esota 55424 - attention: city ".Amager -F 5: Ver n. Avenue.. south If to Jerry's, eta 512 a X5486 :•` - Ede ne�'.3an'sota Attei Son: �Mr. Gerald A. Pau °lser Such addresses may be changed by•'eiti er party upon_ notice to the other party given as hereifs prbv44ed4 �� °,;Iu:�a:::r....° ._....c_..:'J . .. ,... � .- .r �.t -... �: :':;'7 ca. •�.: ._.... ... .:. -s. .�... .. ...N'. _. ._.��.: ._. '.:i'. t'':.4 ..3�vF;;^:�ta�w„• 10. Coslo JbTFYIS,Shall�,pay all State deed taxes and .recording fees Jn. conneciton with, this instrument and initruments delivered alit...tbr.j? . j�gr-qphq 5 and 7 hereof. • Ar. 12. Covenants Rlirinin-4witlf th2•Land. The terms and`; di:ti6ns REEFER -:shaIJL run- wxtn the Lana and shall bind and u -present and future owners - .i ;� re 6D' the bi�ef it of' all of•-'(Mch properties,,- THIS INSTRUMENT IS EXEMPT FROM STATE DEED TAX. 114 TESTIMONY WHEREOF. the parties nereto have caused th6se presents to be dLily executed the day and year first above.writte_ CITY OF EDIBM BY s ayor —A 664 And / :, Al.'J'A. - - Its Cler SOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, 14INNESOTA 5 -A gy,7Its 7.s ice C aa_Ulman . N? . .14 And 4wz . 3 ICs. cretary NTR"RI Tian Its And Its 04 COUVITY. OF RENNEPIR).. fte f , oresiptng mognt; was acknowledged before day og - 1%; im;- - a W.M.,... 'A 6d k�'� I AfejrAj _'4 *VIA ®f..: r - 0 F MA R $ ra VO4t,; --mu n I rp—" corporat iont CEAfO L iAftEN 109 CV HENNEPIN COMM STATE OF KrIgiMSOTA). COUNTY Or The =13;0 -jag troant was acknowledge !§ before mi� -this .2ng day Mi ,-.':1987 by FJ.-k f. ge4.4j and Z t&ej the. vaj. -4%Z.Z_ an ; . T -AN - RED VuLoPMENT AUTHORITY. . -flea-efl1w �i he"HousING .0 . a CIT ZDIh_A_j,_A_1flWS_6TA, a body ,politic and corporate under the 1An,!Sthe State of Niiines6fit, on behalf of said corporation. MARCE•LA M. DAEHN qs# NOTARY ruIsLjr. AENW5PIN COUNTY LIY CO-' eAPim, Apr. it. low 0:5"N. ­­.! ---- ST.ATS W Rif 0=76Y or fqreq�&Pg inqtrwent was acknowledgeA before me - this Jhly, - of ''T6b'm0ky, 1987, by d6rald. a Paulsen, the, preslwfit� of - �X�y - S - ENTRamism, a A. Por-4tion,"On behalf of said ockpozation. .50MM-Fdllk StMe of Her* al Lame Y CdmmWod ExPres Arg. X. W a 41 .�V. . , ... Al'z w 1- 0 vti e �A CIA: tz f C` .. ...... . a-P . .. ... .... . 14 5 -.7, !:Z t:' �k .—y I -l" p., 0 'p; An' Ii 02 ,Z', t. "K. 0 it i losota- W. "e-3Aj ar�U.'t -,Aqq! -D 1- 0 vti e �A CIA: tz f C` .. ...... . a-P . .. ... .... . 14 5 -.7, !:Z t:' �k .—y I -l" p., 0 'p; An' Ii 02 ,Z', t. ~15_ 1_1 ;'--•-.t h 4.ti...___•G •�••:. .:;L ._ - _ ajr�: a'�lY�:� <r ..f,: °q.;.'.�,...''' nsv^.••:i :T iC;;: ^_ ':! -• o :.` t.r, . , �a`• {.:rTA'B ' 1f: �' i • Cie s1�1�'' O Fi]es='o£ 'tiie=.Iie stray:.. -1- •.sill; ,:Y rl+" ,:[ =.k.' _t;..: �5 Oil 0 !., a•!'n,xl+ - o ie `.L:. ;,L y, '1.F',r -,r�, .:.�` :.,,. _ _s:: .,O „ „'�.. r- � }.����_.�� ,,;'�,���., 1.2,r ":S1QC�S•4��.`Gxs�na.� ;fl;; `.�i•.a�, 6 , `� i f s' yam, c ,d rip ". o : � a her of ;.'oii .:'g: ' 6r . p s e:- ,,� ii�pin Country',.'i inneso. ar _ 'r;y; r•r- `,r.Y!•k'A F•�:r.. •�•w:: �,�.` :r4:'it�.i .fY�:1:^: - - .. :e -1-A d..21- i ck 3;; Grsnd View Heights, accordin if,x�.eoiid with s: 4 `Cc.14 t ' ,... ,rte :'�'�'S�± '- t:f <�Fy:.:� a':y.' =v:ii •':i:?:;,;.4° � "1Y <r;�-'4^ �" �:. _ ! a• .,:iii ' .5..,_ ",! r`„�,..., L... :' :.� . .,+...+.,.irr�,. 'S• ..J'i�1 }. ..F.. '�•,•: '•�% .. ';�:..,:'i -•Lr. �,::i^ -•:�:.� '� • `..3 >..c.r `•yi.�'. .. Ii?t` fni1.1 7;: ane1's i'� 8i.ock 3 •�. i @ ct.;-.?t w: :Be3 ghts,..- accQrcling . -' L'.1,d . �3: .. _ :.r•: �4'.N±it�i t ,P•r. Amu .r ,D „ +' R' P§ )rd it : fit P f ' ,tip ''P. X a c =i hCsiu s•:: c -F� tihat:'.;f?4ticct �Yy -��., ':fir•. _ ,�' qh:�q Aa Thy � drt+'..,of I,fl �s: i ; f� ;sSi<2 ' j � ..mock 4, .. rt tlY 4 c t4.6h .a es :L yv.; _{pa {2.; a.;• �F'H? t H3 ;. .,_ � .., k • , �•�:� ��.�!�- 3�s;�4��nu�. lyi''�.- ;� r��:� •� &m:Q°.5atcxas:..sti33i,.Aelt ,'_ �.` ��,_; L! 1il> ���]':: �;:. ���; ��?+ 4` i!` Fic:: ��` f'�iirej�'�`i��- .��''�j'�1:i'th :.7'1.21P.':'.0��+�$j.l� . ;,t::'_':• ' ;: [-' t - .r - n.-_;n ...v.•:.: mod. c yy ••cL�.t. A�Sj.�Yas,��,yc��zy�:= A�:;�!??�eti' ���f`V��' �. af: ?a''l tse� P�i�11��: w3C2i >: •: �;:r': ,� ';;):' ••' :js�.•. T;,lr: _- L,pe.tr• L•SrA StO~aL`nte•rrLL ri t�cM+! my •1'�• :,;. k' �''' a��..•.�,��ip1. '.�'�3i ' A�.,.S�$L.'.P::.��;Ci21�� ='�� , "t:•r._ _ :,ms's 7ii0� ».r SC,q-E)i°dTn �. �.,�:� :��: c�Y ='�t313'.. �,,le•:,p�;;d�':'"�eccrd. .LL; ':;� -- R ?,. .:�� .e:':�:�'s.�';x� ?�� �'�� ;itt�-:.�1�ic��:t�'or` %� a�;ei`.Goi?ht�,f = •� ^:.,. -.�'. ,'�G.- ��'��� �"'J7Y. .. i. �••�:: ,_ ..�... rte. r•i> .�5- .Y4. {...�t..r _ .,.s.. ,:ti.i,� -.:. ..5 �• ..�:ca:�i. '..t'^. a'�' ':YtY.`syer" — - '•�.'x:55%:y \:�.r• ti_: :�r�' <�-- _ - .ati: }.a� = >�-• R[ ��i":y :��.�y. .,.tYZ •S ,rte � }ir :: « 3 ?fin •a :2i.'''s�,�..i,.. :y�.i�:.0 t ?r,�-'i►r�a;.sr:t.,�2� _a::� utz�est.' :.•..: - .S. ,,.. WY•- ''`21@ „':zA r, ..tic G. 3:- _ <,y!_^•`.:5.,_ i 3_ � :�.'t� m.d•,,.�`�Sti }�' ' tY'"' '•.d: ?y- ;; :iqu- 3$ tFY = Tea ,p,• "sue L9' .r_ t' Wi`��y _p.y�i'y b7�:•�jfS !. L .•w x' 3. +Z St --.r. W'- 1+,,!a+, -'ts ,v!'i czn ”' herejd p i ; ii3:; 8c usi .Aveh ud``aYa�9 'tsii@�n'•f.?se” '�', '? �� �! . eLot-, b�l 'i5'rJ'.ass;i'r�ko�t~1s'` =+? :.uay''4sg;;o :s�►z':': i7 •' "`� L -�i �' � � f .0'Y �pj... `�i fa::l`r�''�'L'Y•' ;���Y ! . Ji•M.:' :a. • � �- �' S• �h' ��i3 :��t:p�r; :,'�,3's:iC�!!;;1,;. AP-:- �•m r. !° ":.iYr,ih . C e�`.bc:. _ .;.x•��� _,�c�'.. -. .�,:,i�c„•[.�`��.b�1r@; l5 �,�;�3�. �. _ •'�i7�" ,4'�G"i'di"���,;: �+,-'QW� 4�;: -: y�'':�• "�i h,' .:, bye S' �•.... tY'- `'� ��`a },.�stir � _ :1:: :t�i:sr?S' +.t �,.- :�' &+.�: •rY: ! 4�.'! t.. •5,- 'l�,,fi�rr .�•-•: ` `+h _ �'br -�` � :.S•, : 6i . "!4 $ 1 . . "•�I: �. u.1..�,, �a"1 l ,•`�.':`;:ks:� .k.�4,.';. - .r ,.1,1Y;; '.rJ:�r�iS, �dt':- �;y.•:,•.' r `'v.�k-�i�_e - =. -: 1.2 rY +m�: �••-. ::: •.; '-•._:.' ,'�.. ':_ 5 - 'ia> tt.i=��',E.'•'r •�%h ;'�ii1l�. '� <enf;:3•"{'::�'•ty ''. �' - " - _' ___ - �•. " ;yia. i'aw- 'Jivr:,.., :.,:ve+v •:.•Vyi i7n;.:ti'n - - ''1•' `mil" -,+. Y:,.•�xr'= �_,'l_' ^. .1:�,. .L� ,'1• •'�'` - �y.r,,•Jd.S, /X, - "^'L': ��>. Ali.y�,...¢silt'_ ` ✓ «' ..j -stn _ 4yi:. �,.... .iiA;. "L, '^/•off VL _ 4.,v" _ 2 -i.Y tnLt'. ._ :a,rY.z; s .• >s•y:. -.J : ;kr';, -.r,' d:• "i,:, � ""''. ^•s— .:a:JCI ? !` "•' -:`L ^, - ve;:•.'r+i• ;s•- :3"'�S -• ,., 1.:'., -b'L _>•'. ..:ry�.i >t.�„L�C• �r.. ate' ��.,.� . ':.- �`'r`:.. ,...r:.,a _ '1 ?: __ •,rnai�.r; 7+!? i r -r'l' � ^.,i. y '.`to �,,�1 :- .:.:._,. .4s,.,.u.c ura+. r "�,�'ly' Y3°, •,- ,�•1, -',`- '.rl :i'; ii:�. e�'«�, �t't': .:. vs:.i:., �:r+; wir.+. l: x< ft� •t,•- 5�;'-y.;.<rc.- '=':::._,:,. ax.::,.:; +�• �.:-.: cri.�!x,3r,_•`r : ib% _ - r;�;. v"' �L1.1i' +,' �. -e"�° •.�'� ..v� •� _ :,�,. rte,.? �s� ; - s.:i� 'y -•��.k " ;� i�";. , -tl.. +; �:,; �` `sr'i,- 'Si1_c` - :+L� "ti:�,.:S�r'a- ,�fyt{ -� xyrtir,.'#,'irJ,d�';v.=..: .s! �- �.., :r.:. "s ��L�'•.`:!�-.: L.:'s:•;:- �.`viY_: �,•,:x .�'.'il7 =-�`tl�ii};. . �. _..:•'J�- �`- L�.Y:S?s�'lt:^'cF,. �'.._ ..,._.`?`r•:. .:.:: IG'' L-. �: G:i:i%.r�.b•'.'rour;�s:,^gi3�s,_ �:,.. ,'C"yy`-X"Y,�`S,::r..:ra.. ^._.: .a.._�_��� >.... - .r?>": 'Day •z.�y: =s`_ ��iar�'2s.: `s+ -:- it f4A Aj; m n p5, " 1 i -.iR.. �c.S .. '.: L�.,'j:'S� fj.S r�Y �; `y.ti rn•{.•�. :L+ ..�• �1 °•34 �.���' :�� .� :pie G. • 71 $• ^C'f+ � ••�.�; h ' :• - ih 'J 1�! f I I 1111 ! �! .. •,� .. !1} ,t;: :,;. is y MOB a osors slow ; ' .�neiettnAi) oiFta :. c nM. �• ,:eX1411A9��oagy.. tly ' ���Yt41"> t°. .'�,t�4�c�Fq�!Y►.�'iwss.�.•_.4+ � w. � F. � �'; - '`='{ .... � ,.� .,,,•i,�j.�a�: .tw. @i;' - 1. "7���' ••�pgtq., .. _ `�1 nmvmcn ew►on.a. Ilairta�sm�iim'ssa --` — - 'I�i< ---'.: _ •+' wA I -lm 7 17 on nl I 7fk 77 ',ice • a. MEW 14, W.T rM f. 4v is - TA tm 4: MAI AII+O R I, �7, . qq Z,: I ? "It i, vt� iV t7, . Hr f On vm 5F 2 Y 900 MY / ` b _.�" - - - - •t" :':::� _ _ ='per = - - -- - _ f. - c.. r' y. - 11 Ft '..11 Fr';v 7r :—IR :YAa`— B'JROR at"1yd :ns. Af 1: .01 --3.49. DIX s rz 7 a Iga 60 BE TY---� J�+y'a FeeaAAa Edina City Council Ladies and Gentlemen: I am the President of Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. Unfortunately, I am out of town and unable to attend the working session and City Council meeting on Tuesday, January 181h. I am writing to express my support of the redevelopment of the current Jerry's Hardware site.. As you know, we expect to sell that site to Semper Holdings for development as a Walgreen's store. I was a member of the Grand View District Small Area Planning Task Force from its inception until recently. In that capacity I was able to share with the members of the Task Force my appreciation for the vibrancy of this area. My participation in that Task. Force also reinforced for me the City's goals and desires for this area. I am confident that our proposed redevelopment accomplishes the goals of the City, and particularly the intentions of the Grand View District. We will be using existing structures, yet improving the physical presence of the retail area. This redevelopment allows Jerry's to revitalize its existing properties, as well as providing the synergy for other redevelopment or development in the area. The increase of business, employment opportunities, and retail customers in the area will confirm the importance of this retail center in the community. I ask that you approve the documents required to accomplish this redevelopment. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Robert N. Shadduck CORPORATE OFFICES JERRY'S ENTERPRISES. INC. - -- - 5101 VERNON AVENUE S0. • EOINA. MN • 55436 X Oz's -+.3 3921)(y -v I TEL.: (952) 922 -8335 FAX: (952) 929 -9281 JERRY'S /SEMPER /WALGREEN'S - VERNON AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT DEVELOPER COMMENTS The Jerry's Hardware property on Vernon Avenue is intended for redevelopment as a Walgreen's Store. This redevelopment offers positive change, including: 1. The redevelopment serves as a catalyst for overall redevelopment of other properties in the area. Relocating the hardware store to the Jerry's food store building provides an opportunity to redevelop the exterior face and interior first floor of that property. Jerry's intends these changes will evidence the vibrancy of this area and encourage additional development and redevelopment in the Grand View District. It is Jerry's expectation that these changes will result in an enhanced sense of place in this retail hub or "downtown" for west Edina. 2. The addition of Walgreen's in the Grand View District provides additional economic vitality. Walgreen's offers additional and unique service uses to the shopping district and the addition of a new business will increase retail traffic in the area. This synergy will cause existing local retailers to be more successful and attract other retailers to the District. All of this activity allows the area to move closer toward its intended position as a neighborhood center that serves local residents, with regional connections. 3. The improvements to the Walgreen's portion of the retail center will physically enhance the entire existing retail area, including the City's liquor store, and will demonstrate cooperative use and integration between public and private development. 4. The proposed sidewalks will serve Walgreen's and the parking ramp, and connect to the existing Jerry's food store sidewalks. This installation will greatly improve the connectivity, walkability, and pedestrian friendliness of the overall development area. 5. While the redevelopment provides the first step of incremental change for the Grand View District, it maintains existing structures reflective of Edina's innovative development heritage. Sustainable buildings will continue to be used for their best purpose, yet given a new "face" to display a unique, functional, attractive, life - filled, vibrant, and pleasantly walkable commercial area, providing both shopping and service uses. 6. The existing community parking ramp will better link the properties through sidewalks, while continuing to allow convenient parking. A consistent goal of this redevelopment is the safe movement of pedestrians, bikes, and vehicles through the area, while maintaining the future ability to connect to other parcels within the development district, as well as enhance opportunities for public transportation. 7. The redevelopment will provide expanded employment in the Grand View District and within Edina. Walgreen's will bring new employment opportunities. Projected new businesses will expand the employment base. Existing businesses in the area will strengthen their business and employment structure. And, Jerry's will continue to serve as a significant employer in the community. _ EXISTING WEST ELEVATION = 30' -0” ARCHITECTURAL PREPARED FOR: CONSORTIUM L.L.C. JERRY'S FOODS REMODEL EDINA, MN 901 North 3rd Street 612 - 436 -4030 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Fax 612 -692 -9960 0 I PROPOSED ELEVATIONS SCALE: AS NOTED PROJECT NUMBER 0►10/601 ISSUED DATE 061410 - DRAWN BY !L CRECKE D -BY lid — A3.1 Architectural Consortium, L.L.C. 20' I I I I I I j j ll16HT OP EXIST. -18'1 EIF9 'r I \ - Nl9i FET EMT. t7RIGIG EXI57. FETAL PARAru . 161 FETAL NP3V EXIST. R',u,1F 11NNLJJNRRLtt PARAPET 161 FETAL RAILING RmP ', °— 'A"M' RA1UN4 YV XAfaRL i RAILIIIS y TERRY'S 1 1{ARDR 'ARE 1 � — RESTAURANT l 1 NEW STOPS IS11 ILLUM. - 5TCRER✓<ONT NEVI MCK / NEW DEGGRA" NEVI TKNeoM NBd FETAL 161 FETAL 11121 y ON TENANT CANOPY EtYOND STOPS PIER5 LII WI C-O W/ BV IT CANOPY PLANTERS 516NA6E FROSTED 61155 PROP05ED REST ELEVATION 11, = 30 '-0 „ _ EXISTING WEST ELEVATION = 30' -0” ARCHITECTURAL PREPARED FOR: CONSORTIUM L.L.C. JERRY'S FOODS REMODEL EDINA, MN 901 North 3rd Street 612 - 436 -4030 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Fax 612 -692 -9960 0 I PROPOSED ELEVATIONS SCALE: AS NOTED PROJECT NUMBER 0►10/601 ISSUED DATE 061410 - DRAWN BY !L CRECKE D -BY lid — A3.1 Architectural Consortium, L.L.C. 20' i _ EXISTING WEST ELEVATION = 30' -0” ARCHITECTURAL PREPARED FOR: CONSORTIUM L.L.C. JERRY'S FOODS REMODEL EDINA, MN 901 North 3rd Street 612 - 436 -4030 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Fax 612 -692 -9960 0 I PROPOSED ELEVATIONS SCALE: AS NOTED PROJECT NUMBER 0►10/601 ISSUED DATE 061410 - DRAWN BY !L CRECKE D -BY lid — A3.1 Architectural Consortium, L.L.C. 20' n r J ��V ��Y•� L' II f �44Y\Q �,,6 i BSc C(r teis Wo 7 a a v i v �i1 • ti� \ PIPE BUI/PLR C0.0 GUARDS ('TP) X ll _ ACCESSIBLE Oj • %X �V PARKING STALL BIKE RACK ARCHITECTURE PLAN 6 111 , 19 5'. J S' SIGN/ IO RE�aDERBO/ I �. ¢ 4 V �'l I-- TRAFFIC C0.0 X, '„- ,C7(O7(T' RAMPS(TYP)- S GNTI(OTYP) .. t. 'DRIVE— THRU -' �IARMACY SIGN . RJ.5' CONSTRUCTION LIMITS O`\ �3 �4\ m 2� E- .s dY5 RTC <1 ^. CUTTER �.EXIS RII f. ) f� PIPE BOLLARD INSTALL V FROM EDGE OF CONCRETE WALK (TYP) TAA SURF AGE ,rJ FREE-STANDING ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN k POST 1 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN DtO E / �fQ' PROPOSED ERVIOUSQ 2,468 SF. (PU9UMCT;R[TE BRIDLE): ' ryv, Q I' C2.3 CURB AT BUILDING 2 •�. DRIVE THRU YdN00W `PIPE BDI'PER GUARDS / INSTALL 4.5' WARDS �l NOTES 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION TAKEN FROM BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHY SURVEY PERFORMED BY CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING. INC , STILLWATER. MINNESOTA, ON OCTOBER 16, 2010. EXPRESSLY FOR THIS PROJECT. RHO CANNOT GUARANTY THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THIS INFORMATION. VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION /CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR UNKNOWN UTILITIES ARE FOUND THAT IMPACT DESIGN OR IMPAIR CONSTRUCTION, THE ENGINEER AND OWNER SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFIED. 2. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE TO FACE OF CURB AND EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. O MEET AND MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS. PROVIDE TRANSITION AS NECESSARY. 4O. CURB TO BE 8612 CONCRETE CURB k GUTTER. 5O. SEVEN -BIKE TUBULAR STEEL BIKE RACK. PROVIDE 5' ACCESS AISLE BEYOND PARKING AREA, 807H SIDES OF RACK. YELLOW PAINT STRIPING (TYPICAL). BLACK OUTLINE ON CONCRETE PAVEMENT. ACCESSIBLE AISLE TO BE HCH DUALITY YELLOW DIAGONAL PAINT STRIPING. ACCESSIBLE SYMBOL TO BE BLUE. 7O. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN FOR READERBOARO SIGN. INSTALL CONCRETE BASE FOR SIGN AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. 8. MAXIMUM CROSS SLOPE I.SX ON ALL WALKS. SITE PLAN SUMMARY �� ZONING: PCD -2 PLANNED COMMERCIAL DISTRICT -2 Yom/ ` AREA SUMMARY 4 R• '• CURB FO ' TRANSFORMER / /)JN• ,;•ZN.. E Y01G�I PROPOSED ERVIOUSQ 2,468 SF. (PU9UMCT;R[TE BRIDLE): ' • . , - PARKING SUMMARY �� I• U4 ° 4 4 Yom/ ` j 4 R• '• CURB FO ' TRANSFORMER / 'DO O NOT _ 20 Tom) 'STOP' SIGN BRACKET MOUNTED ENTER' dO1S ON BUILDING - I . . 9' °�o SIGI - 5 4 T C - 001 FR COi:CRE.E ENTER aO PROPOSED CURB & Q .-. WALK `7 3 Y,R fX11TER MATCH U- B612 CURT Et CUTTER ?� EXISTING CURB 'STOP'/ I DEPRESS CURB 'DO NOT ENTER' SIGN 0 PAVEMENT \y�- E (TYP) BRACKET MOUNTED ON DUILDING XX PAINTING O CONSTR UM-ITS I -LL' OMB _ — PROPOSED PARKING 59 STALLS (ON EXISTING 63 STALLS) 2 - 8•%IB' ACCESSIBLE STALLS 57 - 9•X18' STALLS LEGEND F-7 CONCRETE PAVEMENT d. I NORTH 0 20 40 ILA Lt 1N fEt, CAMBURAS & THEODORE LTD f 2454 E. DEMPSTER STREET DES PLAINES, IL 60016 DRAYANG55PECIFICATIONS BY: ❑ WALGREENS'CONSULTANT 0 LANDLORD'S CONSULTANT ALL CONSTRUCTM YORK UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, BY: ❑ WALGREENS' CONTRACTOR 0 LAN'DLORD'S CONTRACTOR (TURNKEY CONSTRUCTION) STORE BUILDING NEW. ... ❑ NEW. .... ❑ REMODELNG EXSTIND ..... ...■ RELOCATION..... ❑ NEW SHELL ONLY.. ❑ OTHERS........ ❑ LTD. ° °JVVA SUITE 1275JA�GA MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 P.O. BOX 357 H LONG LAKE, MN 55356 j P PAX: 932-47& &6 jO rvnv.RHOJerdapmenLrnm De, -d°p —t Consulting CERTIFICATION AND SEAL IHEREBYCERTIFY TRATTHIS ��yyA PLAN AND SPECIFICATION C!I WAS PREPARED BY ME OR eN UNDER MY DIRECT b SUPERVISION AND T}RAT I All. I Yc •a, A DULY REGISTERED �. \ Stephen M. JahmIw PROFESSIONAL EN.(% UNDER THE lAY7$ ?F', ; -� REGISTRATIOI4 NO: I8914 STATE OF A r1Y y' J% DATE: 17/X%/10 SIGNIFIED B3'.`f fiANO AND SEAL -- �..,. I I 12-XX -10 BUILDING PERMIT DESCRIPTION GATE DESCRIPTION DOCUMENT ISSUESIBENCHMARKS STORE XXXX PROJECT NAME WALGREENS STORE VERNON AVENUE S. EDINA, MN DRAWING TILE SITE PLAN CADD PLOT: SCALE! V-27 DRAWING NO. C11 -laxx DRAWN BY: VOID PLOT: PS REVIEWED BY: C 1 .1 RELEASED TO SI.0 CONSTRUCTION: PROJECTNO. TOXX -00 RESTATED PARIONG R THIS RESTATED EASEMENT ANI "Restated Easement ") is made as of January _ Minnesota municipal corporation (the -'.`City"), I AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MIIyNES�OTA, a State of Minnesota ( "HRA "), aridjERRY'S E] ( "Jerry's ") L &V: 1/13/11 �4G RAMP AGREEMENT (this 1, b*\'d ong the CITY OF EDINA, a )US AND REDEVELOPMENT =1SES, Q'' and corporate under the laws of the INC., a Minnesota corporation 'ALS: The City, the HR�\and Je '�s enWred into that certain Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement dated as of February 1, �87, recorded in the office of the Hennepin County Recorder on March 19, 1987 as D cument Number 5242349 and in the office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles oni uary 29, 1988, as Document Number 1905238 (the "Original Easement "), as amended by th 't certain First Amendment to Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement dated as of May 28, 1987, recorded in the office of the Hennepin Country Recorder on April 26, 1988, as Document Number 5400795 and in the office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on April 22, 1988, as Document Number 1922982 (the "First Amendment "). The Original Easement and the First Amendment are collectively referred to as the "Easement" in this Restated Easement. The City is the owner of certain real property described on Exhibit A attached (the "City Property"). Jerry's is the owner of certain real property described on Exhibit B attached ( "Jerry's Property "). The Jerry's Property consists of a northerly parcel, so described Exhibit B ( "Jerry's Northerly Parcel ") and a southerly parcel, so described on Exhibit B ( "Jerry's Southerly Parcel "). DOCS- #3381754 -v6 The parties desire to restate the Easement in its entirety, pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Restated Easement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Termination and Restatement of Easement. The Easement is hereby terminated in its entirety and restated by the terms and conditions of this Restated Easement. 2. Grant of Loading #1 Easement. The City hereby grants, transfers and conveys to Jerry's, its successors and assigns, as an easement appurtenant to the Jerry's Northerly Parcel, an exclusive perpetual easement for the uses described in Section 3 of this Restated Easement over and upon that portion of the City Property depicted on Exhibit C and legally described on Exhibit D (the "Loading #1 Easement "). 3. Use of the Loading #1 Easement. The Loading #1 Easement may be used for the purpose of loading, unloading and moving freight to and from the buildings located on the Jerry's Northerly Parcel. Specifically and not by way of limitation, the Loading #1 Easement shall include the right to park delivery vehicles for whatever reasonable period of time may be required by occupant(s) of the Jerry's Northerly Parcel to complete loading, unloading and moving of freight as described in this Section 3. Notwithstanding the grant of Loading #1 Easement in Section 2 of this Restated Easement, that portion of the area of Loading #1 Easement which is located in the area of the Access Easement (described in Section 6 of this Restated Easement) shall be non - exclusive as to use by the occupant(s) of the Jerry's Northerly Parcel. 4. Grant of Loading #2 Easement. The City hereby grants, transfers and conveys to Jerry's, its successors and assigns, as an easement appurtenant to the Jerry's Northerly Parcel, an exclusive perpetual easement for the uses described in Section 5 of this Restated Easement over and upon that portion of the City Property depicted on Exhibit E and legally described on Exhibit F (the "Loading #2 Easement "). 5. Use of the Loading #2 Easement. The Loading #2 Easement may be used for use of stairs and ramps located in the Loading #2 Easement area; trash enclosures; storage; and any other lawful use associated with the use of the buildings located on the Jerry's Northerly Parcel. Specifically and not by way of limitation, the Loading #2 Easement shall include the right to retain existing fencing around the Loading #2 Easement area. 6. Grant of Access Easements. Jerry's and the City each hereby grants, transfers and conveys to one another for the benefit of (a) Jerry's Northerly Parcel, (b) Jerry's Southerly Parcel, and (c) the City Property, perpetual non - exclusive driveway and pedestrian use easements over and across those portions of Jerry's Northerly Parcel and the City Property which are now or hereafter improved or reasonably determined by the owner of such property to be necessary to be improved with driveways or sidewalks for access by vehicles and pedestrians to and from (i) any structures located on the Jerry's Property and/or the City Property, including that certain parking ramp constructed on the City Property, as depicted on Exhibit K attached ( "Parking DOCS - #3381754 -v6 Ramp ") and (b) public streets and roadways ( "Access Easements "). As of the date of this Restated Easement, the Access Easement granted by the City is depicted on Exhibit G attached and legally described on Exhibit H attached and the Access Easement granted by Jerry's is depicted on Exhibit I attached and legally described on Exhibit J attached. The parties agree that the Access Easements shall also include all sidewalks constructed from time to time for use by pedestrians in or on any portion of Jerry's Northerly Parcel and the City Property. 7. Use of Access Easements. The Access Easements shall be used solely for vehicular and pedestrian ingress and egress purposes by and for the parties to this Restated Easement and their respective invitees, licensees, tenants, lessees, customers, patrons, employees, servants, and visitors. The parties acknowledge that the Access Easements have been constructed prior to the date of this Restated Easement. At all times, the Access Easements shall be maintained in good condition and repair, including without limitation (a) maintaining the surfaces at such grades and levels that they may be used and enjoyed as contiguous and homogeneous common areas; (b) maintaining the surfaces in a level, smooth and evenly- covered condition with the type of surfacing material originally installed or of similar quality, use and durability; (c) all required striping and/or signage; and (d) removing all papers, debris, snow, ice, filth and refuse and thoroughly sweeping the Access Easements to the extent reasonably necessary to keep the Access Easement in a neat, clean and orderly condition ( "Maintenance "). The parties have entered into that certain Maintenance Agreement dated as of the date of this Restated Easement regarding allocation of Maintenance responsibility between the owner of the Jerry's Northerly Parcel and the City. The parties hereby agree that the owner of Jerry's Southerly Parcel shall have no obligation whatsoever regarding the Access Easements, including without limitation any Maintenance obligation. 8. Grant of Parking Easement. The City hereby grants, transfers and conveys to Jerry's for the benefit of (i) Jerry's Northerly Parcel and (ii) Jerry's Southerly Parcel, a perpetual non- exclusive parking easement over and across the upper two (2) levels of the Parking Ramp ( "Parking Easement "). The City specifically reserves the right to exclusively use the lowest level of the Parking Ramp. 9. Use of Parking Easement. The Parking Easement shall be used solely for vehicular parking purposes by and for the parties to this Restated Easement and their respective invitees, licensees, tenants, lessees, customers, patrons, employees, servants, and visitors. The parties acknowledge that the Parking Ramp has been constructed prior to the date of this Restated Easement. 10. Grant of Pedestrian Bridge Easement. The City hereby grants, transfers and conveys to Jerry's for the benefit of Jerry's Southerly Parcel, a perpetual non - exclusive easement for the pedestrian bridges connecting the multi -story office and commercial property building located on Jerry's Southerly Parcel and depicted on Exhibit K ( "Commercial Building ") with the top two (2) levels of the Parking Ramp as depicted on Exhibit K, over that portion of the City Property depicted on Exhibit K attached ( "Pedestrian Bridge Easement "). The pedestrian bridges existing as of the date of this Restated Easement are depicted on Exhibit K ( "Pedestrian Bridges "). 3 DOCS- #3381754 -v6 11. Use of Pedestrian Bridges. Jerry's (and any successor owner of Jerry's Southerly Parcel) shall maintain a connection from each Pedestrian Bridge to the Commercial Building and shall provide access to the Commercial Building during all times when the Commercial Building is open to the public. The Pedestrian Bridge Easement shall continue only so long as the Parking Ramp shall exist. Jerry's (and any successor current owner of the Jerry's Southerly Parcel) shall be responsible for, and shall hold the City and the HRA harmless from and indemnify the City and the HRA against any and all loss, cost, damage and expense, including without limitation, injury or damage to persons or property, reasonable attorneys' fee and expert witness fees, and travel associated therewith, arising out of or in connection with the Pedestrian Bridges or any claim or damage to arise out of the installation, design, construction or maintenance of the Pedestrian Bridges. 12. Use of Parking Ramp. Jerry's (and any successor owner of Jerry's Southerly Parcel) shall repair and maintain the Parking Ramp and the driveways located on Jerry's Southerly Parcel appurtenant to the Parking Ramp, as well as the walkways, Pedestrian Bridges and landscaping appurtenant to the Parking Ramp, including without limitation, removal of snow, ice and debris, sealing for salt erosion, caulking, striping, painting, relamping, and other repairs, except structural repairs (collectively, "Ramp Maintenance "). The parties specifically acknowledge that any driveways appurtenant to the Parking Ramp located on the City Property, will be maintained to thestandards described in Section 7 of this Restated Easement. If the owner of the Jerry's Southerly Parcel fails to perform any Ramp Maintenance, the City may perform such Ramp Maintenance following twenty (20) days notice to the owner of the Jerry's Southerly Parcel of such failure, and levy a special assessment or assessments upon Jerry's Southerly Parcel, pursuant to the procedures established by Minnesota Statutes Section 429.061, or any successor statute, specifically including without limitation, notice as required pursuant to such statute. Such special assessment or assessments shall be payable in one or more installments, as determined by the City, together with interest at the rate then established by the City. Neither the City nor the HRA are required to restore or repair the Parking Ramp if, in the reasonable opinion of the City or the HRA, the Parking Ramp becomes unusable because of damage, destruction, obsolescence, or any other reason. If the City or the HRA maintains insurance on the Parking Ramp, any insurance proceeds received as a result of damage to or destruction of the Parking Ramp will be used for repair or replacement, if sufficient, but neither the City nor the HRA are required to maintain any such insurance or to repair or restore the Parking Ramp if the insurance proceeds are insufficient to pay the entire cost thereof. 13. Grant of Utility Easements. The City hereby grants, transfers and conveys to Jerry's for the benefit of (i) Jerry's Northerly Parcel and (ii) Jerry's Southerly Parcel, a perpetual non - exclusive easement under those portions of the City Property required for the construction, reconstruction, maintenance, and repair of underground electrical power lines, water pipes, sanitary sewer pipes, gas lines and telephone lines ( "Utility Easements "). As of the date of this Restated Easement, the Utility Easements are depicted on Exhibit L attached and legally described on Exhibit M attached. 14. Use of Utility Easements. All construction, reconstruction, maintenance and repair of any of the lines and pipes under the Utility Easements ( "Utility Work ") shall be done at the sole cost and expense of the owner of Jerry's Northerly Parcel or Jerry's Southerly Parcel, as the case may be ( "Jerry's Owner "). Jerry's, as the current Jerry's Owner, hereby agrees to hold 2 ROCS- #3381754 -v6 the City and its successors and assigns, and all future owners and occupiers of the City Property, harmless from and indemnified against any loss, cost, damage or expense, including attorneys' fees, due to any claims or demands, including but not limited to, mechanics' or materialmen's liens filed or claimed against all or any part of the City Property, arising out of, or claimed to have arisen out of Utility Work. The indemnity described in this Section 14 shall be assumed by any future Jerry's Owner, upon such Jerry's Owner's acceptance of a deed to either Jerry's Northerly Parcel or Jerry's Southerly Parcel. 15. Utility Work. All Utility Work shall be done so as to cause as little as possible inconvenience to and interruption of the use of the City Property. Before undertaking any Utility Work, the respective Jerry's Owner shall advise the then owner of the City Property ( "City Property Owner") of the extent of the Work and the estimated cost thereof, and the City Property Owner, at its option, may require that the Jerry's Owner, as a condition to commencing the Utility Work, first deposit with the City Property Owner security, in form, substance and amount reasonably acceptable to the City Property Owner, to ensure that the Utility Work will be completed and the cost of the Utility Work will be paid in full. Any waiver by the City Property Owner of, or failure by the City Property Owner to insist on compliance with, the provisions of this Section 15, no matter how often, shall not be deemed to be a waiver of the right to insist on compliance with the provisions of this Section 15 in connection with any subsequent Utility Work. 16. Required Relocation. The City Property Owner may require the respective Jerry's Owner to relocate any Utility Easement at the sole cost and expense of such Jerry's Owner, to another location on the City Property then owned by such City Property Owner ( "Relocated Easement Area ") on the following terms and conditions: 16.1 Location of Relocated Easement Area. Any Relocated Easement Area over Jerry's Southerly Parcel shall be on and over a strip of land no less than twenty-one feet wide and connecting vacated Brookside Avenue in the City of Edina with the east boundary line of Jerry's Southerly Parcel. Except as set forth in the preceding sentence, a Relocated Easement Area may be in any location or locations on the City Property as may be designated by the City Property Owner. 16.2 Notice. The Utility Easement concerned shall be relocated upon notice given by the City Property Owner to the respective Jerry's Owner, which notice may be given at any time and without reason or cause therefor. 16.3 Relocation Period. In the event notice is given to the respective Jerry's Owner pursuant to this Section 16 with respect to a Utility Easement, the respective Jerry's Owner shall have such time as is reasonably necessary with the prompt exercise of due diligence to relocate the Utility Easement concerned, but, in any event, not more than ninety (90) days from the giving of such notice. 16.4 Revised Recorded Easement. The City Property Owner, with any such notice given pursuant hereto, shall grant and quitclaim to the respective Jerry's Owner by written document, an easement on and over the Relocated Easement Area, fully executed and in recordable form, containing the same terms and conditions as set out in this 5 DOCS -#338 ] 754 -v6 Restated Easement (including, but not limited to, the right of the City Property Owner to thereafter again relocate the Utility concerned from the Relocated Easement Area to another location or locations on the City Property), but describing the then Relocated Easement Area. 16.5 Cost of Relocation. The respective Jerry's Owner promptly shall pay all costs of relocating the Utility Easements concerned, including, but not limited to, the cost of restoring all portions of the City Property from which the Utility Easement concerned is moved to as nearly as possible the condition it was in before any work was done thereon pursuant to this Section 16. 16.6 ' Security. Within fifteen (15) days of receipt of written notice given pursuant to Section 16.5 above, the respective Jerry's Owner shall deposit with the City Property Owner security, in form, substance and amount, reasonably acceptable to the City Property Owner, to insure that the relocation and restoration work is completed by the respective Jerry's Owner and that all costs thereof are paid in full. 17. Documentation of Easement Locations. To the extent easements hereby granted are not specifically defined or are erroneously defined, with respect to location, width or elevation, any party hereto may prepare and document such descriptions, or such accurate descriptions, and each party hereto agrees to execute and delivery such documentation, in recordable form, upon receipt by each such party of information reasonably acceptable to such party that the descriptions are accurate, complete, conform to, and are consistent with, the provisions of this Restated Easement. 18. Minimum Interference. The parties hereby shall always exercise use of their respective easements and rights hereunder, reasonably and in such manner as to cause the least possible interference under the then circumstances with the use and enjoyment by the other parties and persons who have the right to use, or are subject to, such easements, or their respective properties. 19. Notices. Any notice to be given by either party to this Restated Easement shall be given in writing and delivered in person, by overnight courier, by facsimile (with a copy sent by regular mail) or by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: If to the City: If to Jerry's: (as to the Northerly Parcel) DOCS - #3381754 -v6 City of Edina Attn: City Manager 4801 West 50'' Street Edina, MN 55424 Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. Attn: President 5125 Vernon Avenue South Edina, MN 55436 Cl If to Jerry's: Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. (as to the Southerly Parcel): Attn: President 5125 Vernon Avenue South Edina, MN 55436 Such notices, if delivered personally or by overnight courier service, shall be deemed given at the time of delivery; if sent by registered or certified mail, shall be deemed given three (3) days after the time of mailing (or such later date as evidenced by the receipt indicating delivery). Any party may provide a change to the address set forth in this Section 19 by a writing sent pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Section 19. 20. Costs. Jerry's shall pay all recording fees in connection with the recording of this Restated Easement. 21. Construction. The rule of strict construction does not apply to this Restated Easement. This Restated Easement shall be given a reasonable construction so that the intention of the parties to convey a commercially usable right of enjoyment to each other is carried out. 22. Governing Law. This Restated Easement is governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. 23. Amendments. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that this Restated Easement shall not be modified or amended or terminated without the written approval of each of the parties, including any first mortgagee of Jerry's Southerly Parcel. 24. The Running of Benefits and Burdens. All provisions of this Restated Easement, including the benefits and burdens, run with the land and are binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the assigns, licensees, invitees, successors, tenants and employees of the parties to this Restated Easement. 25. ' Termination of Covenant or Liability. Whenever a transfer of ownership of either the City Property, Jerry's Northerly Parcel or Jerry's Southerly Parcel occurs, liability of the transferor for breach of any covenants occurring thereafter automatically terminates provided, however, such transferor shall remain liable for any sums of money or obligations incurred prior to such transfer. 7 DOCS- #3381754 -v6 IN AGREEMENT, the parties have executed this Restated Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement as of the date and year first above written. CITY OF EDINA LIM James Hoveland, Mayor And by Scott Neal, City Manager JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC. Robert N. Shadduck, President STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA By Its Chairman And by Its Secretary The foregoing Restated Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement was acknowledged before me this day of January, 2011, by James Hoveland, the Mayor, and by Scott Neal, the City Manager, of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing Restated Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement was acknowledged before me this day of January, 2011, by , the Chairman, and by , the Secretary, of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a Minnesota body politic and corporation, on behalf of the Authority. Notary Public DOCS- #3381754 -v6 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing Restated Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement was acknowledged before me this day of January, 2011, by Robert N. Shadduck, the President of Jerry's Enterprises, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: LINDQUIST & VENNUM P.L.L.P. (DKP) 4200 IDS Center 80 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 6 ROCS- #13381754 -v6 Notary Public CONSENT BY MORTGAGEE Allstate Life Insurance Company, an Illinois insurance company, as the Mortgagee of the Jerry's Southerly Parcel, as described in the foregoing Restated Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement, pursuant to that certain Mortgage dated May 16, 1995 and recorded May 17, 1995 in the office of the Hennepin County Recorder, as Document No. 6428384 and in the office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles, as Document No. 2608876, hereby consents to the terms and conditions of the foregoing Restated Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement. STATE OF IL: COUNTY OF The for January, 2011, the , respectively, of Allstate Life Insurance Company, an Illinois insurance company, on behalf of the insurance company. ALLSTATE LW �Ml.kSURANCE COMPANY By \ , IV Notary Public ROCS- #3381754 -v6 EXHIBIT A TO SECOND AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT Legal Description of City Property Tracts A and C, Registered Land Survey No. 1393, Files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota. That part of vacated Brookside Avenue, as shown on the plat of Grand View Heights, on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies between the easterly extension across Brookside Avenue of the south line of Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 1393, Files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and the extension across Brookside Avenue of the South line of Hopkins Road, as shown on said plat of Grand View Heights. Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10, Block 3, Grand View Heights, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. DOCS - #3381754 -v6 IW:r:r�:���: TO SECOND AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT Legal Description of Jerry's Property Jerry's Northerly Parcel: Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1393, Files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Certificate of Title No. 703440) That part of vacated Summit Avenue which lies East of the center line thereof, South of the Southerly right -of -way line of Vernon Avenue (County Road No. 158) and Northerly of the Westerly extension of the South line of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1393, which line is coterminous with the South line of the underlying Lot 25, Block 3, Grandview Heights. (Certificate of Title No. 703440) Lots 23 and 24, Block 3, Grand View Heights, and that part of the adjacent portion of the East Half of vacated Summit Avenue lying Northerly of the Westerly extension of the South line of said Lot 23 across said Summit Avenue and lying Southerly of the Westerly extension of the North line of said Lot 24 across said Summit Avenue, except the South 20 feet of Lot 23 and except the South 20 feet of vacated Summit Avenue. (Abstract property) Jerry's Southerly Parcel: Lots 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22, Block 3, Grand View Heights, according to the plat thereof on file or of record with the County Recorder, Hennepin County, .Minnesota, together with the East Half of vacated Summit Avenue lying Northerly of the Westerly extension of the South line of Lot 15, Block 3 across said Summit Avenue and lying Southerly of the Westerly extension of the North line of Lot 22, Block 3 across said Summit Avenue. The South 20 feet of Lot 23, Block 3, Grand View Heights and that part of the adjacent portion of the East Half of vacated Summit Avenue lying Northerly of the Westerly extension of the South line of said Lot across said Summit Avenue. Lots 17, 18, 19 and 20, Block 4, Grand View Heights, according to the plat thereof on file or of record with the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except that portion thereof taken for highway purposes, together with that part of the adjacent portion of West Half of vacated Summit Avenue lying Southerly of the Easterly extension of the North line of Lot 17, Block 4 across said Summit Avenue and lying Northerly of the Easterly extension of the South line of Lot 20, Block 4 across said Summit Avenue. That part of Lot 16 lying East of a line drawn from a point on the South line thereof distant 28 feet East of the Southwest corner of said Lot 16 to a point on the North line of said lot distant 47 feet East of the Northwest corner thereof, Block 4, "Grand View Heights" and that part of the DOCS - #3381754 -v6 West half of the adjoining vacated Summit Avenue lying between the extensions across it of the North and South lines of said Lot 16, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for said County. (Certificate of Title No. 582039) That part of Lots 13 to 15 inclusive, Block 4, lying East of the State Highway No. 5, Grand View Heights, and that part of the adjacent portion of the West half of vacated. Summit Avenue lying between the Easterly extensions across said Avenue of the North line of said Lot 13 and the South line of said Lot 15, which lies Westerly of a line parallel with and 90 feet Easterly of the center line of said State Highway No. 5, accordingly to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for said Hennepin County. (Certificate of Title No. 518199) That part of Lots 13 to 15, inclusive, Block 4, Grand View Heights and that part of the adjacent portion of the west half of vacated Summit Avenue, adjoining Lots 13 to 15 inclusive, lying between the Easterly extensions across said Avenue of the North line of said Lot 13 and the South line of said Lot 15, all of which lies Easterly of a line parallel with and 90 feet Easterly of the center line of State Highway No. 5, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for said county. (Certificate of Title No. 586401) That part of Lot 12, Block 4, "Grand View Heights ", and that part of the adjacent portion of the West Half of vacated Summit Avenue, adjoining said Lot 12, lying between the Easterly extensions across said Avenue of the North and South lines of said Lot 12, all of which lies Easterly of a line parallel with and 90 feet Easterly of the center line of State Highway No. 5. (Certificate of Title No, 703440) DOCS - #3381754 -v6 iz -zo -io / //////// EASEMENT _ — N Ze �0 r DOCS - #3381754 -v6 EXHIBIT C TO SECOND AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT Depiction of Loading #1 Easement NORTHp ��Z /�j z .d�oo��/ n 1pO&m - - - - - -- - - - -- - EXHIBIT D TO SECOND AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT Legal Description of Loading #1 Easement An easement for loading dock purposes over and across that part of the following described property: Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 1393, Hennepin County, Minnesota. said easement is described as COMMENCING at the northeast corner of said Tract C; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 45 minutes 32 seconds West along the northerly line of said Tract C a distance of 39.22 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence North 43 degrees 36 minutes 47 seconds West along said northerly line a distance of 25.71 feet; thence South 46 degrees 10 minutes 58 seconds West along the westerly line of Tract C a distance of 20.05 feet; thence South 43 degrees 29 minutes 07 seconds East along said westerly line a distance of 23.95 feet; thence South 47 degrees 29 minutes 46 seconds East a distance of 56.95 feet; thence North 44 degrees 53 minutes 01 seconds East a distance of 17.74 feet to the easterly line of Tract C; thence North 00 degrees 38 minutes 28 seconds East along said easterly line a distance of 1.48 feet; thence North 46 degrees 18 minutes 31 seconds West a distance of 53.67 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. DOCS- #3381754 -v6 EXHIBIT E TO SECOND AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT Depiction of Loading #2 Easement / EASEMENT INORTH I W Q DOCS- #3381754 -v6 p� Z :y ra r c� \ Cj H O EXHIBIT F TO SECOND AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT Legal Description of Loading #2 Easement An easement for use purposes over and across that part of the following described property: Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 1393, Hennepin County, Minnesota. said easement is described as COMMENCING at the northeast corner of said Tract C; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89. degrees 45 minutes 32 seconds West along the northerly line of said Tract C a distance of 39.22 feet; thence North 43 degrees 36 minutes 47 seconds West along said northerly line a distance of 25.71 feet; thence South 46 degrees 10 minutes 58 seconds West along the westerly line of Tract C a distance of 20.04 feet; thence South 43 degrees 29 minutes 07 seconds East along said westerly line a distance of 23.95 feet; feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 47 degrees 29 minutes 46 seconds East a distance of 36.76 feet; thence South 14 degrees 49 minutes 29 seconds West a distance of 14.40 feet; thence southwesterly 39.18 feet along a tangential curve concave to the northwest having a radius of 49.48 feet and a central angle of 45 degrees 22 minutes 16 seconds; thence South 60 degrees 11 minutes 44 seconds West a distance of 90.20 feet; thence North 80 degrees 02 minutes 45 seconds West a distance of 8.51 feet to the most southerly corner of Tract B, said Registered Land Survey No. 1393; thence northeasterly along said westerly line of Tract C to the POINT OF BEGINNING. - DOCS- #3381754 -v6 EXHIBIT G TO SECOND AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT Depiction of Access Easement Granted by City / EASEMENT / NORTHp� I y�2 Iot cam! v1' or 0 l — — J ` DOCS - #3381754 -v6 z 7 � =53.sr R=51.19 A-5957'42' W=07 -E V �a GUs YOUNG �g LANE is1,4'E W� 11513 WggU - S. Ile OF TRACT C Z q. �3 F.. f c� 11513 WggU - S. Ile OF TRACT C EXHIBIT H TO SECOND AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT Legal Description of Access Easement Granted by City An easement for access purposes over and accross that part of the following described property: Tract A and Tract C. Registered Land Survey No. 1393. Hennepin County, Minnesota and That part of vacated Brookside Avenue, as shown on the plat of Grand View Heights, on file and of record In the office of the Register of Deeds, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which Iles between the easterly extension across Brookside Avenue of the south line of Tract C, Registered Land Survey No 1393, Files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County Minnesota, and the extension across Brookside Avenue of the south line of Hopkins Road, as shown on said plat of Grand View Heights. said easement Is described as COMMENCING at the northeast corner of said Tract C; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 45 minutes 32 seconds West along the north line of said Tract C a distance of 17.94 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence South 14 degrees 49 minutes 29 seconds West a distance of 53.08 feet, thence southwesterly 39.18 feet along a tangential curve concave to the northwest having a radius of 49.48 feet and a central angle of 45 degrees 22 minutes 16 seconds; thence South 60 degrees 1 1 minutes 44 seconds West a distance of 90.20 feet; thence North 80 degrees 02 minutes 45 seconds West a distance of 8.51 feet to the west line of said Tract C; thence South 00 degrees 38 minutes 28 seconds West along said west line a distance of 34.53 feet; thence North 75 degrees 59 minutes 35 seconds East a distance of 31.65 feet; thence South 89 degrees 18 minutes 44 seconds East a distance of 32.62 feet; thence North 00 degrees 41 minutes 16 seconds East a distance of 14.79 feet; thence easterly 56.55 feet along a tangential curve concave to the south having a radius of 18.00 feet and a central angle of 180 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds; thence South 00 degrees 41 minutes 16 seconds West a distance of 16.98 feet; thence South 89 degrees 18 minutes 44 seconds East a distance of 23.00 feet; thence North 00 degrees 41 minutes 16 seconds East a distance of 37.12 feet; thence North 40 degrees 48 minutes 37 seconds East a distance of 27.49 feet; thence North 18 degrees 10 minutes 59 seconds East a distance of 26.97 feet; thence North 01 degrees 49 minutes 32 seconds East a distance of 80.97 feet; thence North 03 degrees 35 minutes 24 seconds East a distance of 46.54 feet; thence North 01 degrees 31 minutes 40 seconds East a distance of 42.87 feet; thence North 64 degrees 57 minutes 54 seconds East a distance of 13.59 feet; thence North 00 degrees 39 minutes 07 seconds East a distance of 10.07 feet to the southeasterly extension of the north line of said Tract A; thence North 58 degrees 26 minutes 02 seconds West along said extension and said north line a distance of 72.27 feet; thence North 36 degrees 12 minutes 34 seconds West along said north line of Tract A a distance of 21.91 feet; thence South 61 degrees 19 minutes 53 seconds West along said north line of Tract A a distance of 103.18 feet; thence South 00 degrees 38 minutes 28 seconds West along the west line of said Tract A a distance of 15.86 feet; thence South 43 degrees 36 minutes 47 seconds East along said west line of Tract A a distance of 12.47 feet; thence North 51 degrees 19 minutes 24 seconds East a distance of 81.23 feet; thence easterly 33.51 feet along a tangential curve concave to the south having a radius of 34.24 feet and a central angle of 56 degrees 04 minutes 39 seconds; thence southeasterly 53.57 feet along a non - tangential curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 51.19 feet a central angle of 59 degrees 57 minutes 42 seconds and a chord which bears South 28 degrees 27 minutes 07 seconds East; thence South 01 degrees 31 minutes 40 seconds West a distance of 50.43 feet; thence South 03 degrees 35 minutes 24 seconds West a distance of 46.09 feet; thence South 14 degrees 49 minutes 29 seconds West a distance of 11.31 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. DOCS- #3381754 -v6 EXHIBIT I TO SECOND AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT Depiction of Access Easement Granted by Jerry's / EASEMENT 2 INORTH Woc . I � R=7.00 A-90'"21' &102'55'39' DOCS- #3381754 -v6 H1..G Ct• 3 r3.LmOF TRACT C m 1Z V� id u� �a U' �j ^a 4� i EXHIBIT J TO SECOND AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT Legal Description of Access Easement Granted by Jerry's An easement for access purposes over and accross that part of the following described property: Parcel 1: Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1393, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Certificate of Title No. 703440. Parcel 2: That part of vacated Summit Avenue which Iles East of the center line thereof, South of the Southerly right -of -way line of Vernon Avenue (County Road No. 158) and Northerly of the Westerly extension of the South line of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1393, which line is coterminus with the South line of the underlying Lot 25. Block 3, Grandview Heights. Certificate of Title No. 703440. Parcel 3: Lots 23 and 24, Block 3, Grand Vlew Heights and that part of the adjacent portion of the East Half of vacated Summit Avenue lying Northerly of the Westerly extension of the South line of said Lot 23 across said Summit Avenue and lying Southerly of the Westerly extension of the North line of said Lot 24 across said Summit Avenue, except the South 20 feet of Lot 23 and except the South 20 feet of vacated Summit Avenue. Abstract Property. said easement Is described as BEGINNING at the northwest corner of said Tract B; thence on an assumed bearing of North 40 degrees 16 minutes 58 seconds East along the northwesterly line of of said Tract B a distance of 39.19 feet; thence North 37 degrees 21 minutes 58 seconds East along said northwesterly line a distance of 75.25 feet; thence North 49 degrees 48 minutes 18 seconds East along said northwesterly line a distance of 92.51 feet; thence South 00 degrees 38 minutes 28 seconds West along the northeasterly Ilne of said Tract B a distance of 15.86 feet; thence South 43 degrees 36 minutes 47 seconds East along said northeasterly line a distance of 12.47 feet; thence South 46 degrees 15 minutes 32 seconds West a distance of 165.96 feet; thence southwesterly 14.28 feet along a tangential curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 18.00 feet and a central angle of 45 degrees 27 minutes 42 seconds; thence South 00 degrees 47 minutes 50 seconds West a distance of 93.02 feet; thence southeasterly 15.80 feet along a tangential curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 10.00 feet and a central angle of 90 degrees 33 minutes 21 seconds; thence South 89 degrees 45 minutes 32 seconds East a distance of 81.51 feet; thence North 73 degrees 42 minutes 54 seconds East a distance of 25.09 feet to the easterly line of said Lot 23; thence South 00 degrees 38 minutes 28 seconds West along said easterly line of Lot 23 a distance of 31.14 feet to the north line of the south 20.00 feet of said Lot 23; thence North 89 degrees 45 minutes 32 seconds West along said north line of the south 20.00 feet a distance of 160.00 feet to the centerline of vacated Summit Avenue; thence North 00 degrees 38 minutes 28 seconds East along said centerline a distance of 50.81 feet; thence South 76 degrees 25 minutes 52 seconds East a distance of 1 1.73 feet; thence northeasterly 12.57 feet along a tangential curve concave to the northwest having a radius of 7.00 feet and a central angle of 102 degrees 55 minutes 39 seconds to the westerly line of said Lot 24; thence North 00 degrees 38 minutes 28 seconds East a distance of 75.12 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. DOCS- #3381754 -v6 EXHIBIT K TO SECOND AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT Depiction of Parking Ramp, Commercial Building and Pedestrian Bridle Easement I I .1� NORTH I TRACT A CP I I a" J - TRACT 5 1- y 24 TRAC C I I r Iq COMMERCIAL BUILDING 22 0 gl0 CV. � I I I I 21 I e PARKING PEDESTRIAN RAMP rrr — I ------4 E I 1 I I I ,9 I n I I —W - -, I I i -- I II I L$ 9j j - - -- -- -- 20 I I I 15 1 ,a I DOCS - #3381754 -v6 1 W Q I �a J KC DOCS- #3381754 -v6 r 12, IN EXHIBIT L TO SECOND AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT Depiction of Utility Easements 1w NORTH Z Q� AGO �- S. Lbg OF rnArr J- GUS YOUNG LN. LANE :i Cj U v Ci ri o� EXHIBIT M TO SECOND AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT Legal Description of Utility Easements 1. Easement for maintenance and use of underground sanitary sewer services under and across the West 15.0 feet of the East 67.5 feet of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1393. 2. Easement for maintenance and use of underground water services under and across that part of Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 1393 lying North of a line beginning at a point on the East line of said Tract C a distance of 155.0 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Tract Q thence West at right angles to the West line of said Tract C and there terminating. 3. Easement for maintenance and use of underground gas services under and across that part of Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1393 described as being 5.0 feet on either side of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Northwest line 35.0 feet southwest from the most Northerly corner of said Tract A; thence southerly 35.0 feet to a point 55.0 feet East of the most Westerly line of said Tract A; thence Southwesterly to the Southwesterly line of said Tract A to a point on the Southwesterly line of said Tract A said point being 115.0 feet Northwesterly of the most Southerly line of said Tract A. 4. Easement for maintenance and use of electrical and telephone services over, under and across those parts of Tract A and Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 1393 being 5.0 feet on either side of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point on the East line of Tract A 40.0 feet North of the Southeast corner; thence Southwesterly to a point on the southwesterly line 5.0 feet North of the Southerly line of said Tract A. Together with an easement on Tract C lying North of a line beginning at a point on the East line of said Tract C a distance of 155.0 feet North of the Southeast corner of said Tract C; thence West at right angles to the West line of said Tract C and there terminating. DOCS- #3381754 -v6 L &V: 1/12/11 TERMINATION (AS TO NORTH TRACT) AND AMENDMENT (AS TO MIDDLE TRACT AND SOUTH TRACT) OF PARTY WALL AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT OF PARTY WALL AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT (this "Amendment ") is made as of January _, 2011, by JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC., a Minnesota corporation ("Jerry's)). RECITALS: Gerald A. Paulsen and Shirley Ann Paulsen, husband and wife ( "Paulsens "), Jerry's, and Grandview Construction Company, a Minnesota corporation ( "Grandview ") entered into that certain Party Wall and Easement Agreement dated as of February 24, 1977, recorded in the office of the Hennepin County Recorder on July 29, 1977, as Document Number 4303499 and in the office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on July 29, 1977, as Document Number 1229526 ( "Easement "). The Easement is set forth as a Memorial entitled "Subordination ", Document Number 1229526, on Certificate of Title Number 703440 ( "Certificate of Title "). The Certificate of Title covers two (2) parcels of real property, as legally described on Exhibit A attached to this Amendment (collectively, the "Certificate Property"). The Certificate Property is part of the "North Tract" described in the Easement. Since the execution and recording of the Easement, Jerry's has purchased the real property owned by Paulsens and the real property owned by Grandview. Accordingly, Jerry's is the sole owner of the real property which is the subject of the Easement and all rights and interests in and to the Easement have merged into common ownership. DOCS - #337741 I -A The Party Wall described in the Easement is located on certain real property (not including the Certificate Property), which collectively comprise (i) the Middle Tract described in the Easement and (ii) the South Tract described in the Easement. The Party Wall is not located on the North Tract described in the Easement and, accordingly, is not located on the Certificate Property. Jerry's desires to amend the Easement to (1) delete all parking easements and rights pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Amendment, (2) to retain only the Party Wall provisions of the Easement and (3) to terminate the Easement in its entirety as to the North Tract, including without limitation the Certificate Property. Terms used in this Amendment shall have the means ascribed in the Easement, unless otherwise defined in this Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Jerry's hereby amends the Easement as follows: 1. Termination of Parking Easement. The Easement is hereby amended to delete any and all cross parking rights between the Tracts, including without limitation the provisions of Sections 7, 8, 9 and 10 of the Easement. 2. Termination as to North Tract. By reason of the provisions of Section 1 of this Amendment, the Easement is hereby terminated in its entirety as to the North Tract, including without limitation the Certificate Property, and Jerry's hereby releases the North Tract from the Easement. 3. Confirmation. Except as set forth in this Amendment, the Easement is hereby confirmed and ratified. Specifically, Jerry's intends that the Party Wall provisions of the Easement shall remain in full force and effect. IN AGREEMENT, Jerry's has executed this Amendment as of the date and year first above written. JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC. Robert N. Shadduck, President DOCS - #3377411 -v4 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing Amendment of Party Wall and Easement Agreement was acknowledged before me this day of January, 2011, by Robert N. Shadduck, the President of Jerry's Enterprises, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: LINDQUIST & VENNUM P.L.L.P. (DKP) 4200 IDS Center 80 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 DOCS - #3377411 -v4 CONSENT BY MORTGAGEE Allstate Life Insurance Company, an Illinois insurance company, as the Mortgagee of a portion which is the subject of the foregoing Amendment of Party Wall and Easement Agreement, pursuant to that certain Mortgage dated May 16, 1995 and recorded May 17, 1995 in the office of the Hennepin County Recorder, as Document No. 6428384 and in the office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles, as Document No. 2608876 hereby consents to the terms and conditions of the foregoing Amendment of Party Wall and Easement Agreement. ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY By_ Its And by Its STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing Consent by Mortgagee was acknowledged before me this January, 2011, by , the _ day of and , the , respectively, of Allstate Life Insurance Company, an Illinois insurance company, on behalf of the insurance company. Notary Public DOCS- #3377411 -v4 EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Property Contained in Certificate of Title Number 703440 Par 1: That part of Lot 12, Block 4, "Grandview Heights ", and that part of the adjacent portion of West Half of vacated Summit Avenue, adjoining said Lot 12, lying between the Easterly extensions across said Avenue of the North and South lines of said Lot 12, all of which lies Easterly of a line parallel with and 90 feet Easterly of the center line of State Highway No. 5. Par 2: Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1393, Hennepin County, Minnesota AND That part of vacated Summit Avenue which lies East of the center line thereof, South of the Southerly . right -of -way line of Vernon Avenue (County Road No. 158) and Northerly of the Westerly extension of the South line of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1393, which line is coterminous with the South line of the underlying Lot 25, Block 3, Grandview Heights. DOCS - #3377411 -v4 THIS MAINTENANCE 2011, by and among the CITY OF EDINA, a JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC., a Minnesc ;i The City is the owner of certa L &V: 1/12/11 ( "Agrdement ") is rrYade as of January , nesota�rnunicipal corporation (the "City") and irporatiol�, " erry's "). described on Exhibit A attached (the "City Property"). Jerry's is the:owner of certain re r perty described on Exhibit B attached ( "Jerry's Property ") �� The City and Jerry's togethr with the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, have entered into\� ertain Restated Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement dated as of the date of this Agreement (the "Easement "). The Easement describes certain Access Easements between the City and Jerry's, as depicted on Exhibits C and D attached. The Access Easements also include all sidewalks constructed from time to time for use by pedestrians in or on any portion of Jerry's Property and the City Property. The parties desire to confirm their agreement regarding the maintenance of the Access Easement areas described in the Easement, pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: DOCS- #13389892 -v 1 1. Access Maintenance. At all times, the Access Easements shall be maintained in good condition and repair, including without limitation (a) maintaining the surfaces at such grades and levels that they may be used and enjoyed as contiguous and homogeneous common areas; (b) maintaining the surfaces in a level, smooth and evenly- covered condition with the type of surfacing material originally installed or of similar quality, use and durability; (c) all required striping and/or signage; and (d) removing all papers, debris, snow, ice, filth and refuse and thoroughly sweeping the Access Easements to the extent reasonably necessary to keep the Access Easement in a neat, clean and orderly condition ( "Access Maintenance "). 2. Performance of Access Maintenance. The City is responsible for performance of Access Maintenance on the City Property and Jerry's is responsible for performance of Access Maintenance on the Jerry's Property. Both parties hereby agree that any and all Access Maintenance shall be performed in a manner so as not to unnecessarily hinder or prevent ingress and egress from and to the City Property and/or Jerry's Property (collectively, the "Properties ") and Vernon Avenue and/or Interlachen Boulevard. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if any Access Maintenance (such as seal coating) requires the non -usage of any Access Easement area for any period of time, then such Access Maintenance which prevents usage of the Access Easement areas (a) shall be performed so as not to prevent such usage for a period in excess of 24 consecutive hours unless a longer time period is necessary; (b) shall be performed during the time periods least disruptive to the business operations on the Properties; (c) shall be commenced only after a minimum of ten (10) days notice to the other party, and (d) in all events access and usage shall not be blocked or hindered in excess of 48 hours during any 12 calendar month period. The City and Jerry's agree to cooperate so as to mutually agree upon the day(s) on which use of the Access Easement areas shall be unavailable. 3. Landscaping Maintenance. Certain trees and other plantings have been installed along the right -of -way of Vernon Avenue, lying westerly of the City Property and Jerry's Property ( "Plantings "). The City is responsible for maintenance of the Plantings ( "Planting Maintenance ") and Jerry's shall have no responsibility whatsoever for Planting Maintenance. 4. Failure to Perform Maintenance. In the event either the City or Jerry's fails to perform Access Maintenance and/or Landscaping Maintenance ( "Defaulting Party"), the other party ( "Performing Party ") will have the right, without being obligated to do so, to enter upon the Defaulting Party's Property and perform the obligations of the Defaulting Party pursuant to this Section 4. The Performing Party shall provide the Defaulting Party with fifteen (15) days prior written notice of such intention, specifying the nature of the alleged default and the actions to be performed, prior to the commencement of such action. During such fifteen (15) day period the Defaulting Party will have the right to perform or commence performance of action appropriate to remedy such default, and provided such action is diligently carried to completion, the right of the Performing Party to perform such noticed Maintenance obligation of the Defaulting Party will terminate. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Defaulting Party fails to remove snow within a reasonable time period following a snowfall, the Performing Party may arrange for removal of such snow with only such notice as may be reasonable under the circumstances. If the Performing Party elects to perform the Maintenance obligation of the Defaulting Party, on completion of such action, or from time to time if the default is of a continuing nature, an itemized statement of the costs thereof will be submitted to the Defaulting Party and the stated amount will be due and payable to the Performing Party within ten (10) days of such statement. 2 DOCS- #3389892 -v 1 5. Failure to Make Payment. In the event either party fails to make payment in the manner required in Section 4 of this Agreement, then such unpaid amount will bear interest at the rate of three percent (3 %) above the prime rate of interest published from time to time by the Wall Street Journal as of the date the Performing Party incurred the cost, which rate will remain in effect until the unpaid amount is paid ( "Default Interest "). If the Wall Street Journal discontinues publication of the prime rate, the prime rate will be determined by an index or procedure that reasonably reflects and monitors commercial borrowing rates. Such unpaid amount, together with Default Interest thereon and all costs of collection thereof, shall constitute and become a continuing obligation of the defaulting Owner. The Performing Party may bring an action against the Defaulting Party to pay such costs and expenses, and in such event there shall be added to the amount owed by the Defaulting Party, all costs of collection, including without limitation reasonable attorneys' fees and costs actually incurred in connection with such action. 6. Dispute Resolution. This Agreement may be enforced against either party by legal or equitable action (including specific performance) in Hennepin County District Court. In the event any such action is commenced, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its costs and expenses incurred in such action, specifically including reasonable attorneys' fees, against the non - prevailing party. Any failure to enforce any covenant, term or condition contained in this Agreement shall in no event be deemed to be a waiver of the right to do so thereafter nor of any right to enforce any other term of this Agreement. 7. Notices. Any notice to be given by either party to this Agreement shall be given in writing and delivered in person, by overnight courier, by facsimile (with a copy sent by regular mail) or by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed as follows: If to the City: City of Edina Attn: City Manager 4801 West 50'' Street Edina, MN 55424 If to Jerry's: Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. Attn: President 5125 Vernon Avenue South Edina, MN 55436 Such notices, if delivered personally or by overnight courier service, shall be deemed given at the time of delivery; if sent by registered or certified mail, shall be deemed given three (3) days after the time of mailing (or such later date as evidenced by the receipt indicating delivery). Any party may provide a change to the address set forth in this Section 7 by a writing sent pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Section 7. 8. Construction. The rule of strict construction does not apply to this Agreement. This Agreement shall be given a reasonable construction so that the intention of the parties to convey a commercially usable right of enjoyment to each other is carried out. 3 DOCS- #3389892 -v 1 9. Governing Law. This Agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. 10. Amendments. The parties hereto acknowledge and agree that this Agreement shall not be modified or amended or terminated without the written approval of each of the parties. 11. The Running of Benefits and Burdens. All provisions of this Agreement, including the benefits and burdens, run with the land and are binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the assigns, licensees, invitees, successors, tenants and employees of the parties to this Agreement. 12. Termination of Covenant or Liability. Whenever a transfer of ownership of either the City Property or Jerry's Property occurs, liability of the transferor for breach of any covenants occurring thereafter automatically terminates provided, however, such transferor shall remain liable for any sums of money or obligations incurred prior to such transfer IN AGREEMENT, the parties have executed this Maintenance Agreement as of the date and year first above written. CITY OF EDINA Lo James Hoveland, Mayor And by Scott Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC. : Robert N. Shadduck, President The foregoing Maintenance Agreement was acknowledged before me this day of January, 2011, by James Hoveland, the Mayor, and by Scott Neal, the City Manager, of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. DOCS - #3389892 -v 1 Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing Maintenance Agreement was acknowledged before me this day of January, 2011, by Robert N. Shadduck, the President of Jerry's Enterprises, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: LINDQUIST & VENNUM P.L.L.P. (DKP) 4200 IDS Center 80 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 DOCS- #3389892 -v I EXHIBIT A TO MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Legal Description of City Propert y Tracts A and C, Registered Land Survey No. 1393, Files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota. That part of vacated Brookside Avenue, as shown on the plat of Grand View Heights, on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies between the easterly extension across Brookside Avenue of the south line of Tract C, Registered Land Survey No. 1393, Files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and the extension across Brookside Avenue of the South line of Hopkins Atod, as shown on said plat of Grand View Heights. Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10, F Hennepin County, M DOCS- #3389892 -v1 plat thereof, EXHIBIT B TO MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Legal Description of Jerry's Property Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1393, Files of the Registrar of Titles, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Certificate of Title No. 703440) That part of vacated Summit Avenue which lies East of the center line thereof, South of the Southerly right -of -way line of Vernon Avenue (County Road No. 158) and Northerly of the Westerly extension of the South line of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1393, which line is coterminous with the South line of the underlying Lot 25, Block 3, Grandview Heights. (Certificate of Title No. 703440) Lots 23 and 24, Block 3, Grand View Heights, and that part of the adjacent portion of the East Half of vacated Summit Avenue lying Northerly of the Westerly extension of the South line of said Lot 23 across said Summit Avenue and lying Southerly of the Westerly extension of the North line of said Lot 24 across said Summit Avenue, except the South 20 feet of Lot 23 and except the South 20 feet of vacated Summit Avenue. (Abstract property) DOCS - #3389892 -v1 EXHIBIT C TO MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Depiction of Access Easement Granted by City / EASEMENT a & / NORTH k ��A A Q or P ao + B C C S DOCS- #3389892 -v 1 X, I i i " -. O L =53.5i Ra51.19 v�� W a59sr +z' id GUS p YOUNG Ig LANE is �.f- I �% f4s Mu S. LM OF TRACT C ^� m V) o c� z Q. Lill ti. c� f4s Mu S. LM OF TRACT C EXHIBIT D TO MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Depiction of Access Easement Granted by Jerry's t -tz -tt / EASEMENT Z / NORTH �p 4-r-v- tn O O� 4 e=10255'39' DOCS- #3389892 -v1 a�oct• � �- S. Lm OF TRACT C �U I lz Q; 12d �u \ '7 ci ;a u9 c� r L &V: 1/07/11 TERMINATION OF DECLARATION AND AGREEMENT REGARDING ACCESS AND PARKING EASEMENT THIS TERMINATION OF DECLARATION AND AGREEMENT REGARDING ACCESS AND PARKING EASEMENT (this "Termination ") is made as of January _, 2011, by JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC., a Minnesota corporation ( "Jerry's ") and ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois insurance company ( "Allstate "). RECITALS: Jerry's, Northwestern National Life Insurance Company, a Minnesota corporation ( "NWNL "), and Commercial State Bank in St. Paul, a Minnesota banking corporation ( "Commercial ") entered into that certain Declaration and Agreement Regarding Access and Parking Easement dated December 21, 1987, recorded in the office of the Hennepin County Recorder on April 26, 1988, as Document Number 5400794 and in the office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on April 22, 1988, as Document Number 1922981 (the "Original Easement "). The Original Easement was amended by that certain Assignment and Modification entered into by Jerry's, NWNL, Commercial, and Allstate dated May 16, 1995, recorded in the office of the Hennepin County Recorder on June 13, 1995, as Document Number 6437773 (the "Amendment "). Pursuant to the Amendment, NWNL assigned all of its rights in the Original Easement to Allstate. The Original Easement and the Amendment are collectively referred to in this Termination as the "Easement ". DOCS - 0378628 -0 Since the execution and recording of the Easement, Commercial's interest in the real property which is the subject of the Easement ( "Property") has been released. The Property is also encumbered and benefitted by that certain Restated Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement dated as of the date of this Termination ( "Restated Easement "), which Restated Easement restates the terms and conditions of that certain Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement dated February 1, 1987, which was recorded in the office of the Hennepin County Recorder on March 19, 1987 as Document Number 5242349 and in the office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on January 29, 1988 as Document Number 1905238, and was amended by that certain First Amendment to Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement dated May 28, 1987 and recorded in the office of the Hennepin County Recorder on April 26, 1988 as Document Number 5400795 and in the office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on April 22, 1988 as Document Number 19222982. The parties desire (a) that the Restated Easement be the only easement governing access between the parcels of the Property and (b) to terminate all parking easements and rights described in the Easement. Accordingly, the parties desire to terminate the Easement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby terminate the Easement in its entirety. IN AGREEMENT, the parties have executed this Termination as of the date and year first above written. JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC. ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY Robert N. Shadduck, President DOCS- 0378628 -0 Its And by_ Its P STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing Amendment of Declaration and Agreement Regarding Access and Parking Easement was acknowledged before me this day of January, 2011, by Robert N. Shadduck, the President of Jerry's Enterprises, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing Amendment of Declaration and Agreement Regarding Access and Parking Easement was acknowledged before me this day of January, 2011, by the and the , respectively, of Allstate Life Insurance Company, an Illinois insurance company, on behalf of the insurance company. THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: LINDQUIST & VENNUM P.L.L.P. (DKP) 4200 IDS Center 80 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 DOCS- 0378628 -0 . Notary Public L &V: 1/03/11 TERMINATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT AND AGREEMENT THIS TERMINATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT AND AGREEMENT (this "Termination ") is made as of January , 2011, by JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC., a Minnesota corporation ( "Jerry's "). RECITALS: Jerry's, Grandview Construction Company, a Minnesota corporation ( "Grandview "), and Minnesota Federal Savings and Loan Association, a United States corporation ( "Minnesota Federal") entered into that certain Restrictive Covenant and Agreement dated July 13, 1977, recorded in the office of the Hennepin County Recorder on July 29, 1977 as Document Number 4303497 and in the office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on July 29, 1977 as Document Number 1229524 (the "Restrictive Covenant "). Since the execution and recording of the Restrictive Covenant, (a) Jerry's has purchased Grandview's interest and is the fee owner of all of the real property which is the subject of the Restrictive Covenant ( "Property") and (b) Minnesota Federal's interest in the Property has been released. The purpose of the Restrictive Covenant was to confirm the manner of levy and payment of a special assessment described in the Restrictive Covenant as the "Parking Lot Assessment ". The Parking Lot Assessment has been paid in the full and the Restrictive Covenant is of no further force or effect. Accordingly, Jerry's desires to terminate the Restrictive Covenant. DOCS- #3381734 -v1 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Jerry's hereby terminates the Restrictive Covenant in its entirety. IN AGREEMENT, Jerry's has executed this Termination as of the date and year first above written. JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC. LIM Robert N. Shadduck, President STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing Amendment of Declaration and Agreement Regarding Access and Parking Easement was acknowledged before me this day of January, 2011; by Robert N. Shadduck, the President of Jerry's Enterprises, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: LINDQUIST & VENNUM P.L.L.P. (DKP) 4200 IDS Center 80 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 DOCS- 0381734 -0 Notary Public e f MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JANUARY 4, 2011 7:06 P.M. OATH OF OFFICE City Clerk Mangen administered the oath of office to Council Members and HRA Commissioners Joni Bennett and Josh Sprague. Members Sprague and Bennett introduced family members in attendance, and the audience responded with a round of applause. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett approving the Council consent agenda with the exception of Items II.C., Resolution No. 2011 -02, Designating Official Newspaper for 2011; and II.K.1., Resolution No. 2011 -10, Receiving Feasibility Report for Neighborhood Street Reconstruction: BA -355 Golf Terrace Street Reconstruction. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES APPROVED — REGULAR MEETING OF DECEMBER 21, 2010, AND EXECUTIVE SESSION OF DECEMBER 21, 2010 Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett approving the minutes of the regular meeting of December 21, 2010, and executive session of December 21, 2010. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes._ MAYOR PRO TEM APPOINTED Mayor Hovland nominated Ann Swenson, the longest serving member, to serve as Mayor Pro Tern for 2011. Mayor Hovland made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to appoint Ann Swenson as Mayor Pro Tern for 2011. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -01 ADOPTED — ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -01 accepting various donations. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -02 ADOPTED — OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER FOR 2011 DESIGNATED The Council discussed the circulation of The Sun Current and noted residents could call to request the newspaper if needed. The Council asked staff to include an article in the upcoming About Town and on the City's website advising of contact information. Manager Neal indicated staff would also address this concern with The Sun Current management. Member Sprague introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -02, Designating Official Newspaper. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -03 ADOPTED — SIGNATORY DESIGNATED Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett to adopt Resolution No. 2011 -03, Signatory Resolution. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. Page 1 A Minutes /Edina City Council /January 4, 2011 *RESOLUTION NO.- 2011 -04 ADOPTED — DIRECTOR /ALTERNATE DIRECTOR OF SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY DESIGNATED Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett to adopt Resolution No. 2011 -04, designating Director and Alternate Director to Suburban Rate Authority. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2011-05 ADOPTED — DIRECTOR /ALTERNATE DIRECTOR OF LOGIS DESIGNATED Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett to adopt Resolution No. 2011 -05, designating Director and Alternate Director to LOGIS. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -06 ADOPTED — FACSIMILE SIGNATURES AUTHORIZED Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett to adopt Resolution No. 2011 -06, authoring use of Facsimile Signatures by Public Officials. Motion carried on rollcall vote —five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -07 ADOPTED - OFFICIAL DEPOSITORIES DESIGNATED Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett to adopt Resolution No. 2011 -07, Designating Official Depositories. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -08 ADOPTED — EDINA FIRE RELIEF BOARD APPOINTED Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett to adopt Resolution No. 2011 -08, Designating Municipal Trustees of the Edina Firefighters Relief Association Board of Trustees. Motion carried on rollcall vote —five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -09 ADOPTED — HEARING DATE SET FOR FEBRUARY 1. 2011 — NEIGHBORHOOD STREET RECONSTRUCTION: 1. BA -371 KILLARNEY SHORES STREET RECONSTRUCTION: 2. BA -372 MCCAULEY HEIGHTS STREET RECONSTRUCTION: AND, 3. BA -373 OSCAR ROBERTS STREET RECONSTRUCTION Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett to adopt Resolution No. 2011 -09, Set Public Hearing For February 1, 2011 For Neighborhood Street Reconstruction for: Killarney Shores, Improvement No. BA -371, McCauley Heights, Improvement No. BA- 372, Oscar Roberts, Improvement No. BA -373. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -10 ADOPTED — FEASIBILITY REPORTS RECEIVED FOR NEIGHBORHOOD STREET RECONSTRUCTION: BA -355 GOLF TERRACE STREET RECONSTRUCTION The Council asked about the wording of the resolution and the legal significance of the action "received ". Mr. Neal advised that the resolution was correctly worded and acknowledged the information prepared and submitted by staff, established the official scope, and baseline of that scope. The Ce-uRci' asked hGW .^S„d^ ^t +r -affi^ ve -lume and speed ;Neu'a be ^da " ^1 ;i;Pd Council Member Bennett asked about landscape islands and bump -outs recommended by staff. Public Works Director /City Engineer Houle stated that a traffic study was not conducted but discussions had been held with residents at informational meetings. The COURG" ested ad_d_i*, ^ ^ ^' data ^ . t^ the ^„blip he ffi^.,. Member Bennett requested that to prepare for the public hearing, Council members be given data on area traffic volumes, speeds and crashes and cost of the landscape islands and how that cost will be paid; and that the School District, Fire and Police Departments, and Bike Edina Task Force be asked to comment on how landscape islands in other locations have impacted the operations of emergency vehicles, school buses and bicycles. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -10, receiving the Feasibility Report for Neighborhood Street Reconstruction: Golf Terrace, Improvement No. BA -355, Carson's Hill, Improvement No. BA -370. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /January 4, 2011 *RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -10 ADOPTED — FEASIBILITY REPORTS RECEIVED FOR NEIGHBORHOOD STREET RECONSTRUCTION: BA -370 CARSON'S HILL STREET RECONSTRUCTION Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett to adopt Resolution No. 2011 -30, receiving the Feasibility Report for Neighborhood Street Reconstruction: Carson's Hill, Improvement No. BA -370. Motion carried on rollcall vote —five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -11 ADOPTED — HENNEPIN COUNTY ELECTRONIC PROPRIETARY DATA BASE (EPDB) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT LICENSE AGREEMENT APPROVED Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett to adopt Resolution No. 2011 -11, approving Hennepin County Electronic Proprietary Data Base (EPDB) Conditional Use Permit license agreement. Motion carried on rollcall vote —five ayes. *2011 BOARD OF APPEAL & EQUALIZATION DATE SET Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett setting Board of Appeal and Equalization initial public hearing date on April 11, 2011, at 5:30 p.m. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *ASSISTANT WEED INSPECTOR APPOINTED Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett appointing Park Superintendent Vince Cockriel to Assistant Weed Inspector for calendar year 2011. Motion carried on rollcall vote —five ayes. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Brindle and seconded by Member Bennett approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated December 23, 2010, and consisting of 28 pages: General Fund $82,686.74; Communications Fund $5,226.18; Police Special Revenue $225.00; General Debt Service Fund $3,950.00; Working Capital Fund $261.84; Equipment Replacement Fund $1,585.77; Art Center Fund $10,343.78; Golf Dome Fund $491.32; Aquatic Center Fund $45.96; Golf Course Fund $6,076.65; Ice Arena Fund $18,753.81; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $63,111.60; Liquor Fund $256,959.41; Utility Fund $20,309.74; Storm Sewer Fund $1,219.00; PSTF Agency Fund $11,931.70; TOTAL $483,178.50 and for approval of payment of claims dated December 30, 2010, and consisting of 24 pages: General Fund $194,364.64; Communications Fund $465.02; Working Capital Fund $7,624.45; Equipment Replacement Fund $1,500.00; Art Center Fund $5,796.85; Golf Course Fund $1,791.59; Ice Arena Fund $474.08; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $14,121.31; Liquor Fund $154,714.97; Utility Fund $385,083.76; Recycling Fund $32.52; PSTF Agency Fund $16,315.76; TOTAL $782.284.95. Motion carried on rollcall vote —five ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 7:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, January 18, 2011. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the January 4, 2011, meeting available. Page 3 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JANUARY 4, 2011 5:10 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:10 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were Members Brindle, , Swenson, Member -elect Sprague and Mayor Hovland. Member Bennett entered the meeting at 5:10 p.m. Staff attending the meeting included: Scott Neal, City Manager; Ceil Smith, Assistant to the City Manager; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Mayor Hovland said the purpose of the meeting was to discuss the City's advisory boards and commissions. Manager Neal briefly reviewed Edina Code Section 180 which outlined the attendance policy pertaining to City's advisory boards and commissions. He noted the following "removal clause" had caused some questions and concerns: "180.02 Removal. Any member of a board, commission or committee established by the City Code who fails to attend three consecutive meetings, whether regular or special, or who fails to attend at least 75% of the scheduled meetings in any calendar year, whether regular or special, shall be deemed to have resigned as a member of the board, commission or committee. The requirement of this subsection shall not apply to attendance at meetings of committees or subcommittees including committees of the whole, established by a board, commission or committee." The Council discussed the process for removal from an advisory board or commission due to attendance. Issues reviewed included: • "Committee of the Whole" exemption from the attendance requirement • Partial committee or sub working groups were exempt from the attendance requirement • Vagueness of meaning of "special" meeting • Concern with a member not making attendance requirement due to "special" meetings when they attended all regularly - scheduled meetings • Should reappointment provisions be added to code • Possible code amendment removing three meetings in a row, but keeping 75% annual attendance • Possible survey of boards and commissions to ascertain what special meetings have been held in the last three years, and had difficulty with obtaining quorums been experienced; what were the topics covered at the special meetings, and were actions taken by the board or commission at the special meetings • Should there be a City Council case by case review • Desire to treat all members equitably • Definition of "Joint City Council Work Session" differing from "Special Meeting" • Attendance by remote (audio or video conference) at regular meetings The Council also discussed the possible elimination of dual membership from its advisory boards and commissions. Their consensus was to amend the City Code deleting the Planning Commission dual memberships on: Heritage Preservation Board, Energy & Environment Commission and Edina Transportation Commission. The Council indicated their intention to bring together all the chairs from their advisory boards and commissions in a joint work session with the Council in early 2011. It was thought that at this session the roles of various boards and commissions can be reviewed and clarified. Minutes — Work Session /Edina Citv Council /January 4. 2011 Staff was directed to prepare an amendment to the City Code incorporating all the advisory boards and commissions into one section, incorporating portions of the City of Bloomington's code regarding advisory boards and commissions, and eliminating the dual memberships from Planning Commission. This would require adjusting the memberships to the various boards served by Planning Commissioners. Further research will be completed into the possible remote participation at meetings and the possibility of capturing the audio from work sessions. Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, January 18, 2011 James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 2 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JANUARY 5, 2011 5:00 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. in the Mayor's Conference Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Also attending when persons were being interviewed for their respective board or commission were: Mike Fischer, Planning Commission Chair, and Diane Plunkett Latham, Energy and Environment Commission Chair. City Clerk Mangen was also in attendance. Mayor Hovland stated the purpose of the meeting was to interview applicants for appointment to the various City Council Advisory Boards, Committees and Commissions. The following candidates for appointment were interviewed: Terry Alhstrom, Ron Anderson, Katherine Bass, Kevin Bohrer, Sarah Zarrin, Scott Davidson, Todd Doroff, Daniel Gieseke, Alice Hulbert, Marian Johnson, Keith !Kostfuch, Norman Owens, Adnan Qureshi, and Thomas Raeuchle. There being no further business, Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 7:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, January 18, 2011 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JANUARY 6, -2011 5:00 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. in the Mayor's Conference Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Also attending when persons were being interviewed for their respective board or commission were: Mike Fischer, Planning Commission Chair; Bill McCabe, Art Center Board Chair; and Diane Plunkett Latham, Energy and Environment Commission Chair. City Clerk Mangen was also in attendance. Mayor Hovland stated the purpose of the meeting was to interview applicants for appointment to the various City Council Advisory Boards, Committees and Commissions. The following candidates for appointment were interviewed: Carlin Struckman, Scott Waggoner, Glenn Bruder, Elin Schold Davis, William Glahn, Carl Hansen, Karl Juhnke, Colin Nelson, Kip Peterson, Larry Chestler, Julie Risser, Janet Seidman and Michael Thompson. There being no further business, Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 7:45 p.m Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, January 18, 2011 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JANUARY 11, 2011 5:00 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. in the Mayor's Conference Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Also attending when persons were being interviewed for their respective board or commission were: Mike Fischer, Planning Commission Chair; Arnie Bigbyee, Human Rights and Relations Commission Chair and Diane Plunkett Latham, Energy and Environment Commission Chair. City Clerk Mangen was also in attendance. Mayor Hovland stated the purpose of the meeting was to interview applicants for appointment to the various City Council Advisory Boards, Committees and Commissions. The following candidates for appointment were interviewed: Jeff Bartleson, Marc Bogursky, Thomas Bonneville, Ann Braden, Matt Doscotch, Barbara La Valleur, Mary Ellen LaVelle, Robert McKlveen, Ken Potts, Bill Sierks, Eric Strobel, Stephen Winnick, Michael Plattetfer, Julie Mellum and Helen Winder. Following the interviews, Jennifer Janovy, Transportation Commission Chair joined the meeting. The Council reviewed the applicants and deliberated upon the choices available to them to fill the seventeen open positions on the City's Boards and Commissions. There being no further business, Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 10:00 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, January 18, 2011 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor r� of Vu REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: ll. A. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE 60 ® Action Director of Public Works / F] Discussion City Engineer Information Date: January 18, 2011 Subject: Public Hearing Minnehaha Woods Street Reconstruction Improvement No. BA -334, Resolution No. 2011 -14 ACTION REQUESTED: If the Council determines the project to be necessary, cost - effective, and feasible, Council shall adopt Resolution No. 2011 -14 approving Minnehaha Woods Street Reconstruction Improvement, Improvement No. BA -384, authorize plans and specifications to be completed. and bids taken. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: City Staff initiated this project. The proposed project involves reconstructing the existing roadway including adding new concrete curb and gutters, replacement of the water main, upgrades to the sanitary and storm sewer systems. The Feasibility Study was received by Council at the December 21, 2010 City Council Meeting. A revised question and answer sheet from the December 9 informational meeting is included with this packet. The overall project cost is estimated at $6,611,000, which includes City owned utility repairs. Funding for the roadway cost will be from a special assessment of 100% of the roadway cost. All City owned utility repairs will be from the respective utility funds. Staff and our consultant, SEH, Inc. has analyzed the project and feels that the project is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible from an engineering standpoint. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2011 -14 Certification of Mailing Public Hearing Notice Revised Question and Answer sheet from December 9, 2010 Informational Meeting G: \Engineering \Improvements \BA334 Minnehaho Woods Street Recon (2011) \PRELIM DESIGN \FEASIBLITIY\Public Hearing \Item Il. A. Public Hearing Minnehaha Woods Street Improvement No. BA -334, Resolution No 2011- 14.docx w9sl,l� RESOLUTION NO. 2011-14 o E) ORDERING IMPROVEMENT FOR .ay MINNEHAHA WOODS NEIGHBORHOOD STREET RECONSTRUCTION .�• IMPROVEMENT.NO. BA -334 City of lading WHEREAS, a resolution of the city council, adopted the 21St day of December, 2010, fixed a date for a council hearing on Improvement No. BA -334, the proposed improvement of Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Street Reconstruction; and WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was'held thereon on the 18tH day of January, 2011, at which all persons•desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: 1. Such improvement is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible to update aging infrastructure. and address several issues including drainage problems, sanitary sewer problems and water main improvements and upgrades. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered. 3. The city engineer is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. 4. The city council declares its official intent to reimburse itself for the costs of the improvement from the proceeds of tax exempt bonds. Dated: January 18, 2011 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF`HENNEPIN )SS CITY-OF .EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF'CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly .appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City. Council at its Regular Meeting of January 18, 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of '20 City Clerk City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE CITY OF EDINA ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following date December 30, 2010, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing for Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements, BA -334 (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the 'records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 12 days prior to the date of the hearing; and that I also sent said notice to the following corporations at the indicated addresses whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of said County Auditor. NAME ADDRESS WI LNESS my hand and the seal of said City this day of eI , 20AO _. Edina City Clerk City of Edina December 30, 2010 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS MINNEHAHA WOODS NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -334 The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall on Tuesday, January 18, 2011, at 7:00 p.m. to consider the public hearing on neighborhood roadway improvements for the Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements. This hearing is being conducted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. This hearing has been called as a recommendation from staff. The proposed project would be constructed in the summer of 2011 with the assessment hearing occurring in. the fall of 2012. The estimated project cost is $3,121,000. The cost of the project will be funded by special assessments. The estimated cost per assessable lot is $16,300 per residential equivalent unit. The assessments can be divided over a ten -year period with interest accumulating on the unpaid balance. The area proposed to be assessed by the proposed improvements includes all properties between and including: 5400 to 5533 Brookview Avenue; 5501 to 5521 Dever Drive; 5400 to 5537 Kellogg Avenue; 5600 to 5628 Kellogg Place; 5400 to 5617 Oaklawn Avenue; 5400 to 5601 Park Place; 5413 to 5601 Woodcrest Drive These 'properties are proposed to be assessed at approximately $16,300 per residential equivalent unit. Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties which are considered to be benefited by the improvement. The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 PID Taxpayers Name Street A Street Taxpayer Address Taxpayer City, St ZIP 1902824120016 STEVEN W RIDER & MARY C RIDER 5400 BROOKVIEW AVE 5400 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120017 DAVID G STOLPESTAD & CHRISTINA L STOLPESTAD 5404 BROOKVIEW AVE 5404 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120018 SUSAN E G OLSON & RICHARD J OLSON 5408 BROOKVIEW AVE 5408 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120019 TAMARA L RICHARDSON & JONAS A RUNQUIST 5412 BROOKVIEW AVE 5412 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120020 CONRAD LEIFUR 5416 BROOKVIEW AVE 5416 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120015 ROSEMARY SIEVE & LORAS SIEVE 5417 BROOKVIEW AVE 5417 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120021 GERALDINEA NIEBUHR & FREDERICK W NIEBUHR 5420 BROOKVIEW AVE 5420 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120014 PENNYA TYSON & MARK TYSON 5421 1BROOKVIEWAVE 5421 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120022 JODY L SWANSON ROSS & DALE R ROSS 5424 BROOKVIEW AVE 5424 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120013 LIESBETH K NERHEIM & ELDON NERHEIM 5425 BROOKVIEW AVE 5425 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120023 CONNIE L GRADY 5428 BROOKVIEW AVE 5428 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120012 BRIAN PANKRATZ & ALYSSA PANKRATZ 5429 BROOKVIEW AVE 5429 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120024 JOHN F BLOODSWORTH & DIANE G HEACOX 5432 BROOKVIEW AVE 5432 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120011 CATHERINE W BELL 5433 BROOKVIEW AVE 5433 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120025 STEVEN K LEE & CONRAD F MEYER WEG 1 5436 BROOKVIEW AVE (ZH) SWITZERLAND 1902824120010 EUGENE PETERSEN & EDNA PETERSEN 5437 BROOKVIEW AVE 5437 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120115 BRUCE MACHMEIER & 5500 BROOKVIEW AVE 5500 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120157 LINDA J DOUGHTY & BRIAN J DOUGHTY 5501 BROOKVIEW AVE 5501 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120116 TRACY K LANGEVIN & TODD R LANGEVIN 5504 BROOKVIEW AVE 5504 BROOKVEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120156 STEVEN D BRYAN & NATALIE S SYNHAIVSKY 5505 BROOKVIEW AVE 5505 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120117 SHERYL BARE & ROBERT KIRK 5508 BROOKVIEW AVE 5508 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120155 KATHLEEN M BUEGLERITRUSTEE 5509 BROOKVIEW AVE 5509 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120118 CASSIDY R STEINER & ANDREW G STEINER 5512 BROOKVIEW AVE 5512 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120154 ELIZABETH M JOHNSON 5513 BROOKVIEW AVE 5513 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120119 WILLIAM M MEYER & TOBIE J MEYER 5516 BROOKVIEW AVE 5516 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120153 THOMAS A GARTON & RACHEL B GARTON 5517 BROOKVIEW AVE 5517 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120120 JOANNE M NOVAK 5520 BROOKVIEW AVE 5520 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120152 THOMAS E FISCHER & BARBARA J FISCHER 5521 BROOKVIEW AVE 5521 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120121 ROBERT A PECK & LISA E PECK 5524 IBROOKMEWAVE 5524 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 . 1902824120151 TRICIA T CLARKE & DONALD E CLARKE 5525 BROOKVIEW AVE 5525 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120122 JAMES W STANGL & BRIDGETA STANGL 5528 BROOKVIEW AVE 5528 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120150 JOHN KELLOGG & CHRISTINE KELLOGG 5529 BROOKVIEW AVE 5529 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120123 JOHN C STEPHENSON & ELIZABETH M STEPHENSON 5532 BROOKVIEW AVE 5532 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120149 MICHAEL S TRESSLER & ANNE E TRESSLER 5533 BROOKVIEW AVE 5533 BROOKVIEW AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824110090 MARK G SWENSON & MARCY G SWENSON 5501 DEVER DR 5501 DEVER DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110081 SARAH M SPENCE & KENNETH F SPENCE 111 5504 IDEVER DR 5504 DEVER DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110089 ELIZABETH F BARNETT &ANDREW WRIGHT 5505 DEVER DR 5505 DEVER DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110082 HAROLD D COVLIN & BEVERLEY B COVLIN 5508 DEVER DR 5508 DEVER DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110088 MICHAEL J CALVO & AMY R SCOTT 5509 DEVER DR 5509 DEVER DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110087 JUSTINA WAHLS &ANNA L WAHLS 5513 DEVER DR 5513 DEVER DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110106 SCOTTA CARD & JULIE W CARD 5517 DEVER DR 5517 DEVER DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110103 NANCY J CAVEN 5521 DEVER DR 5521 DEVER DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824120055 GREG J HERNANDEZ & ANNA L HERNANDEZ 5400 KELLOGG AVE 5400 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120054 KATHRYN E KOESSEL 5401 KELLOGG AVE 5401 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120056 MELANIE SHERMAN & KEITH SHERMAN 5404 KELLOGG AVE 5404 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120053 SANDRA E ROSS & RICHARD A ROSS 5405 KELLOGG AVE 5405 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120057 WILLIAM E MCDONALD & MARYAN M MCDONALD 5408 KELLOGG AVE 5408 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 . 1902824120052 PATRICK E FLANAGAN 5409 KELLOGG AVE 5409 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120058 REBECCA MCCAUGHEY & MARK MCCAUGHEY 5412 KELLOGG AVE 5412 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120051 RICHARD J SHEEHAN & ELIZABETH A SHEEHAN 5413 KELLOGG AVE 5413 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120059 TRACY L HOLTAN 5416 KELLOGG AVE 5416 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120050 SUZY S KRONFELD BAUM & DAVID R BAUM 5417 KELLOGG AVE 5417 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120060 SARAH PARRY & DAVID G PARRY 5420 KELLOGG AVE 5420 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120049 JOHANNA M ZAVORAL & JAMES H ZAVORAL 5421 KELLOGG AVE 5421 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120061 DORIS ANDERSON & BYRON ANDERSON 5424 KELLOGG AVE 5424 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120048 PATRICK T LEE & ANGELA L LEE 5425 KELLOGG AVE 5425 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120062 THOMAS C BERINGER & CATHERINE C BERINGER 5428 KELLOGG AVE 5428 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120063 WILLIAM R LUNGER & LAURA LUNGER 5432 KELLOGG AVE 5432 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120047 FERDINANDA L OTNESS 5433 KELLOGG AVE 5433 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120064 LOREN L TAYLOR & KAREN R TAYLOR 5436 KELLOGG AVE 5436 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120046 MARK T SULLIVAN & JULIE G SULLIVAN 5437 KELLOGG AVE 5437 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120075 ROBERT J HEST & COOKIE H COLEMAN 5500 KELLOGG AVE 5500 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120114 __.,: -, -,: ...., -_,; ;;_ ES!jC &+KEL' YA'JACKs0N„: ;;ie, ,r_t :: is!`;::_.:; 5501 KELLOGG AVE 5501 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120076 NANCY K CARLILE & CHRISTOPHER S CARLILE 5504 KELLOGG AVE 5504 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120113 BHARAT CHARAN 5505 KELLOGG AVE 5505 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120077 MARY E KOTTKE 5508 KELLOGG AVE 5508 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120112 GAIL M COLLINS 5509 KELLOGG AVE 5509 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120078 BRUCE C RUSSELL 5512 KELLOGG AVE 5512 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120111 KATHRYN A MERTZ & DONALD K MERTZ 5513 KELLOGG AVE 5513 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120079 JON L OTTERLEI 5518 KELLOGG AVE 7121 SCHEY DRIVE EDINA MN 55439 1902824120110 DANIEL J GIONET & ANDREA S GIONET 5517 KELLOGG AVE 5517 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120080 CAROLYN R COCHRANE &ANDREW S COCHRANE 5520 KELLOGG AVE 5520 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120109 NICHOLAS J SOLINGER & LISA L SOLINGER 5521 KELLOGG AVE 5521 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120081 SARAH J GRIFFIN & GREGORY J PFLASTER 5524 KELLOGG AVE 5524 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120108 RUTH K PLOTNICKY 5525 KELLOGG AVE 5525 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120082 REED R CHRISTIANSON & LISA M CHRISTIANSON 5528 KELLOGG AVE 5528 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120107 !MARGARET�I REY;NQLDS!'. i=� '.,:5 's' is i +:! ': in =i! i 5529 KELLOGG AVE 5529 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120083 MARY ELLEN BRATTLAND & GARY LEE BRATTLAND 5532 KELLOGG AVE 5532 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120106 MARGARETiP' +GfCLBRALTHC =: _: =ft'= ^'',' 1L KELLOGG AVE 5313 320TH STREET CUSHING MN 56443 1902824120084 JOANNE MCRAE 5536 IKELLOGGAVE 5536 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120105 DIANE N SPANGLER & DAVID R SPANGLER 5537 KELLOGG AVE 5537 KELLOGG AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824130070 PAMELA E SCHWIER & JAMES G SCHWIER 6600 KELLOGG PL 5600 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824130062 IDONA M DARKENWALD & CLEMENT B DARKENWALD 5601 KELLOGG PL 5601 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824130069 JACKIE K DUMMER & DALE M DUMMER 5604 KELLOGG PL 5604 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824130063 ROBERT J DALY & KAREN E DALY 5605 KELLOGG PL 5605 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824130068 ANDREW C TEITSCHEID & AMY J TEITSCHEID 5608 KELLOGG PL 5608 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824130067 SALLY A LAREAU & DONALD E LAREAU 5612 KELLOGG PL 5612 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824130066 ELWOOD MCVEETY 5616 KELLOGG PL 5616 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824130065 GHRLSTINE6VAN'DONGEN '? T.- ", -:i!:` 7 : i "' �; S =yZ'i 5620 KELLOGG PL 5620 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824130061 SCOTT D ASPENSON & AMANDA K ASPENSON 5625 KELLOGG PL 5625 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824130064 TODD S EMERSON & AUDRA M O EMERSON 5628 KELLOGG PL 5628 KELLOGG PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824120036 THOMAS K BROWER & PETRA S BROWER 5400 OAKLAWN AVE 5400 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120035 JEAN D COLWELL & BRYAN D COLWELL 5401 OAKLAWN AVE 5401 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120037 RONALD L KALIEBE &CAROL B FLINT - KALIEBE 5404 OAKLAWN AVE 5404 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120030 SAMUEL PACE & DORIS K PACE 5421 OAKLAWN AVE 5421 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120042 MARJORIE A ADLER 5424 OAKLAWN AVE 5424 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120029 LAVONNE FREDRICKSON 5425 OAKLAWN AVE 5425 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120043 STEVEN L SEVERSON & SARA E SEVERSON 5428 OAKLAWN AVE 5428 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120028 MARIA K EGGEMEYER 5429 OAKLAWN AVE 5429 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120044 JOHN FALLDIN 5432 OAKLAWN AVE 5432 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120027 ROBERT ENGER & MAUREEN O ENGER 5433 OAKLAWN AVE 5433 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120045. STEVEN L THAYER 5436 OAKLAWN AVE 5436 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120026 NANCY H KING & DOUGLAS E KING 5437 OAKLAWN AVE 5437 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424' 1902824120095 GORDON R HILLEQUE & EMILY ERUSHA HILLEQUE 5500 OAKLAWN AVE 5500 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120134 RICHARD W WEIGEL & MARY J WEIGEL 5501 OAKLAWN AVE 5501 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120096 VINCENT P BARRETT & LYNN S BARRETT 5504 OAKLAWN AVE 5504 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120133 KELLY INGVALDSON & ERIC INGVALDSON 5505 OAKLAWN AVE 5505 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120097 WALTER OSTROM & ROBERTA'OSTROM 5508 OAKLAWN AVE 5508 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120132 SUSAN L MORK & MICHAEL D WHITTLEF OAKLAWN AVE 5509 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120096 WILLIAM H KELLY & CARYN E KELLY OAKLAWN AVE 5512 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120131 CEEESTEi4GERS/AIS: " ?L " 5- = ': i ' '` iAS= 'i`< Jc' = _ OAKLAWN AVE 5513 CAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120099 CAROLYNDONNELLY OAKLAWN AVE 5516 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120130 LISA L CARVER & JONATHAN A CARVER 155210AKLAWN OAKLAWN AVE 5517 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120100 JOSEPHINE BAUER & BENJAMIN BAUER OAKLAWN AVE 5520 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120129 KARI FINBERGSCHOOLER & DAVID A SCHOOLER AVE 5521 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 190282 120101 THOMAS P,DAVIS & BRIDGET W DAVIS OAKLAWN AVE 5524 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120128 HEIDI V WENNEN & DARREN J WENNEN 5525 OAKLAWN AVE 5525 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120102 GINA M DIERFELDT 5528- ' OAKLAWN AVE,:<. 3550WOODLANDCT EAGANMN55123 1902824120127 CHRISTOPHER C LONG 5529 OAKLAWN AVE 5529 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 • 1902824120103 HARRIET E BUSDICKER" ' 5532. OAKLAWN AVE 5532 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120126 BRIAN•A BELANGER 5533 OAKLAWN AVE 5533 OAKLAWN -AVE , EDINA MN 55424 1902824120104 PETER R ZIRBEL & CATHY L REED 5536 OAKLAWN AVE 5536 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120125 IROBERT H DALYA LAURA Z DALY , 5537 OAKLAWN AVE 5537 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824130060 RAYMOND J BOOK & JULIE A PARKE 5600 OAKLAWN AVE 5600 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824130001 PATRICIA M VAYDA & DOUGLAS W VAYDA 5601 OAKLAWN AVE 5601 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824130002 TERRY P.UCKETT & JENNIFER SWEETSER- PUCKETT 5609 OAKLAWN AVE 5609 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824130003 JAMES D ALT & DEBORAH K MCKNIGHT 5617 OAKLAWN AVE 5617 OAKLAWN AVE EDINA MN 55424 1902824120001 JOANNE S GORSKI- ALKIRE & DAVID ALKIRE 5400 PARK PLACE 5400 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824120002 RAW L T'SCHLAEFER & BARBARA-SSCHLAEF,ER,! ';c;:: : ;. ,2 5404 PARK PLACE 5404 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824120003 RUSSELL B STRONG & KIMBERLY S STRONG 5412 PARK PLACE 5412 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824120004 JAMES TRIGGS & CATHERINE TRIGGS '5416 PARK PLACE 5416 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824120005 TANYA SKANSE & RONALD SKANSE - 5420 PARK PLACE 5420 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824120006" SCOTT R DORN &ELIZABETH ADORN 5424 PARK PLACE 5424 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824120007 PATRICIA STEWART & JEFFREY O STEWART 5428 PARK PLACE 5428 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824110073 USA C BALKE & JEFFREY A BALKE 5429 PARK PLACE 5429 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824120008 PATRICK M KRISKE & CATHERINE G KRISKE 5432 PARK PLACE 5432 PARK'PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824120009 JOHN B MOONEY & JOAN M MOONEY 5436 PARK PLACE 5436 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824110074 KATHLEEN M FLESHER 5437 PARK PLACE 5437 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824120138 DAVID L TURK 5500 PARK PLACE 5500 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824110011 MARK R BIRCHARD 5501 PARK PLACE 5501 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824120139 TODD L WEIKLE & JILL WEIKLE 5504 PARK PLACE 5504 PARK PIL EDINA MN 55424 1902824120140 EUGENE N BALE ': 5508 PARK PLACE 5508 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824110012 CATHERINE R BRIGGS, 5509 PARK PLACE 5509 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824120141 SHARON E BROWN &ANDREW R BROWN 5512 PARK PLACE 5512 PARK PLACE EDINA MN 55410 1902824110013 L0RGCEDERHQVM GROTZ ?&?JAMESfR GROTZ" Vii; 5513 PARK PLACE 5513 PARK PL EDINA'MN 55424 1902824120142 LAURENCE LOMAX & BARBARA L WENDT 5516 PARK PLACE 5516 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824120143 WILLIAM B STAHL & SUSAN E WALKER 5520 PARK PLACE 5520 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424. 1902824110052.' RODNEY D TEACHOUT & KATHLEEN K TEACHOUT 5523 PARK PLACE 5523 PARK PL' EDINA MN 55424 1902824120144 MICHELE B BRUNNING & ANDREW G WAY 5524 PARK PLACE 5524 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424, 1902824110053 SARA E SWANSON' 5527 PARK PLACE 5527 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824120145 WILLIAM E HIDDING 5528 PARK PLACE 5528 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824120146 SUSAN .V KLEVEN & BRUCE M KLEVEN 5532 PARK PLACE 5532 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824110054` MARK G BUSYN ,, :.; • ,' 5533 PARK PLACE 5533 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824120147 MIA M UEBL & DAVID M LIEBL . 5536 PARK PLACE 5536 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824110055 DANNY LEE EIDSON . ` 5537 PARK PLACE 5537PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824140052 LAURA R HEMLER & DAVID M HEMLER 5601 PARK PLACE 5601 PARK PL EDINA MN 55424 1902824110064 THOMAS W VON - KUSTER JR & MARY S VON - KUSTER 5413 WOODCREST DR 5413 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110065, ROBIN J CARPENTER . 11 5417 WOODCREST DR 5417 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110075 PAMELA E KEARNEY & JEREMIAH J KEARNEY 5420 WOODCREST DR 5420 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110066 RICHARD WEIGEL & ELIZABETH W WEIGEL 5421 WOODCREST DR 5421 WOODCREST DR' EDINA MN 55424 1902824110062 ' LISA JACKMAN,`:RAMSAY &iDAVII)i . . A ....0 : ":''" 5425 WOODCREST DR •5425 WOODCREST DR EDINA'MN 55424 1902824110068 JAMES E STEFFEN &'CARLA C C STEFFEN 5427 IWOODCRESTDR,. 5427 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110105: SUSAN L CRABTREE & BENJAMIN CRABTREE 5428 . WOODCREST DR 5428 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110069' MARK A BRETHEIM & JENNY L BRETHEIM 5429 : WOODCREST DR 5429 WOODCREST DR • EDINA MN 55424 1902824110079. SARAH B MAENNER & PAUL H MAENNER' 5432 ! WOODCREST DR 5432 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110070: PETER MICHIELUTTI & LYNDA R MICHIELUTTI 5433 WOODCREST DR 5433WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110107 BRENDA B BECKER 5437 WOODCREST DR 5437 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110080 MARK K BORDEN'& JANE S BORDEN 5440 WOODCREST DR 5440 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110108: ROBERT MURNEY JR & JANE J.OH 5441 WOODCREST DR 5441 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110083 MARK D LANZ & KAREN L LANZ 5500 " WOODCREST DR 5500 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110092 JAMES B ROTH & DEEPALI ROTH 5501 IWOODCREST,DR 5501 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110084 SARAH A ERICKSON &'RYAN M ERICKSON 5504 WOODCREST DR 5504 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110093 LYNNE P ROHKOHL & JAY D ROHKOHL 5505 WOODCREST DR 5505 WOODCREST DR ' EDINA MN 55424 1902824110085 BRENDA S OLSON 5508 WOODCREST DR 5508 WOODCREST DR . EDINA MN 55424 1902824110094 STANLEY E DAVIS 5509 WOODCREST DR 5509 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110086 VICKIE L ROBERTS & JAMES L ROBERTS 5512' WOODCREST DR 5512 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110056 JUDITH J CARVER 5515 WOODCREST DR 5515 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110059 STEVEN E KLOS & ELLEN J KLOS 5516 WOODCREST DR 5516 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110057 STAN GEYER & BEVERLY L GEYER & ANNIE E GREGORAK 5517 WOODCREST DR 5200 FR%NCEPVE#4N'. -- EDINA MN 55410 1902824110060 JAMES W ROCKWELL & HELEN E ROCKWELL 5520 WOODCREST DR 5520 WOODCREST DR. EDINA MN 55424 1902824110058 JAMES R CAMPBELL & CARMEN D CAMPBELL 5521 WOODCREST DR 5521 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110061 GLENN:GHAFFINiB iCATHYiGHAFFIN = = -: =' i= =; _' ' e;:r5 5524 WOODCREST DR 5524 WOODCREST DR ' EDINA MN 55424 1902824140048 LEONARD A NELSON & GRACE NELSON 5525 WOODCREST DR 5525 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824110062 THOMAJ']tAIFW &MOEEIEAIRAIH= WOODCREST DR 5528 WOODCREST DR EDINA'MN55424 1902824140049 MARK W SHEFFERT 5600 WOODCREST DR 5600 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 1902824140053 ROBERT J OWEN & JUDITH K OWEN 5601 WOODCREST DR 5601 WOODCREST DR EDINA MN 55424 SEH MEMORANDUM. TO: City of Edina FROM: Short Elliott Hendrickson, Inc. DATE: December 10, 2010 RE: Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements — List of Questions asked by Residents at the December 9, 2010 Informational Meeting SEH No. EDINA 113734 93.00 1. It was repeated throughout the presentation `if the project moves forward'. Isn't this a formality? What are the chances that the project doesn't move forward? A: The City Council is the deciding body. 2. Why is this project's assessment rate so much higher than previous City projects? A: The assessment rate is very typical to other projects of this scope. 3. How could it cost the same to repair the sanitary sewer service pipe from the trunk main to the house compared to repairing it from the trunk main to the right -of -way line? A: We observed on the Country Club project that if homeowners were to go from the mainline to the home they were being quoted a little bit more to reconstruct or repair their sanitary sewer services. We believe this occurred due to the cost to mobilize to the site and that the additional expense to go an additional 15 to 20 feet was not that much more. 4. Can I consider repairing my sanitary sewer service pipe from the sanitary sewer trunk main to the right -of -way line now and later repair the sanitary sewer service pipe from the right -of -way line to the house? A: Yes — probably will not save any money by doing it that way. 5. Why is the City considering the sanitary sewer service program in this neighborhood? Don't we have fewer trees and subsequent root issues than the Country Club neighborhood? A: We feel that the infrastructure in this neighborhood is very similar to the Country Club neighborhood, in that the sewer services have the same characteristics with the trees and roots. 6. How much damage will occur to trees next to the road? A: We don't believe that the trees will incur major root damage. Our specifications for projects such as this penalize the contractor severely if they damage trees. 7. What are the penalties to the Contractor for damaging the trees? A: It is a sliding scale depending on the severity of the damage. The funds collected will go to the property owner that is ultimately responsible for the tree. 8. How long is a typical phase of construction? Which phase of the project will go first? A: Typical phase for construction is 6 to 8 weeks. We still need to determine which phase will go first. 9. How will water and sanitary sewer services be repaired? Open cut or trenchless? A: These services will be repaired using both methods. 10. Are there trenchless options to repair the water service pipe from the curb stop to the house? A: Yes, this is a viable option. 11. Is there a benefit for the neighbors to band together to hire a plumber to reconstruct sanitary sewer services? Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55343 -9301 SEH is an equal opportunity employer I www.sehinc.com 1 952.912.2600 1 800.734.6757 1 952.912.2601 fax January 14, 2011 Page 2 A: Yes, we would recommend that you do talk to your neighbors about replacing the services together. At a minimum, we recommend that you compare prices to keep the plumbers honest. 12. Are the proposed assessments tax deductable? A: No, but you should double check with a tax attorney. 13. What is the warranty regarding driveways? If I have a higher quality driveway apron than what the City is proposing to put in, will the City put in the higher quality version? A: The warranty for the project, except for the sod is one year. If you would like to use your own contractor for the driveway work we will credit you what the bid price is and pay your contractor that amount and you would need to fund the remaining cost. 14. What is the limit of boulevard restoration due to street reconstruction? What is the limit of boulevard restoration due to water service pipe reconstruction? What is the limit of boulevard restoration due to sanitary sewer service reconstruction? A: The boulevard restoration includes the sod and any other items such as irrigation and pet fences that are disturbed. In general, the boulevard in front of your home will be impacted. The extent of restoration will vary depending on the proposed street and where your existing water and sanitary sewer service pipes are located. All work is proposed to be completed within the City's right -of -way. 15. Whose cost is it to connect a sump pump to the City's sump drain pipe? A: The only cost paid to the City would be the permit cost. The homeowner is responsible for any costs related to installation of any additional drain pipe from the sump pump to the sump drain pipe. 16. What happens to private landscaping in the street reconstruction limits? A: The homeowner would be responsible for removing their private landscaping if you would like to save it. The project will only include replacing the private landscaping with sod. However, we will allow you to replant the landscaping within the boulevard area. 17. What do you expect construction prices to be this spring? A: We anticipate competitive pricing to continue. tin c: p:\ae \e \edina \I 13734\5final\feasibility report\appendix\20101209 neighb mtg res questions.doex me \- _ '/ REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: II. C. From: Wayne Houle, PE ® Action Public Works Director/ Discussion City Engineer Information Date: January 18, 2011 Subject: Public Hearing: Carson's Hill Street Reconstruction Improvement BA- 370, Resolution No. 2011 -15. ACTION REQUESTED: If the Council determines the project to be necessary, cost - effective, and feasible, Council shall adopt Resolution No. 2011 -15 approving Carson's Hill Street Reconstruction Improvement, Improvement No. BA -370, authorize plans and specifications to be completed and bids taken. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: City staff initiated this project. The proposed project involves reconstructing the existing roadway, improvements to the water main, sanitary and storm sewer systems. The Feasibility Study was received at the January 4, 2011 City Council meeting. The public hearing notice, certificate of mailings, and list of labels are included in this report. No additional correspondence has been received regarding this project. The overall project cost is estimated at $1,835,900, which includes City owned utility repairs. Funding for the roadway cost will be from a special assessment of 100% of the roadway cost. All City owned utility repairs will be from the respective utility funds. Staff has analyzed the project and feels that the project is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible from an engineering standpoint. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2011 -15 Public Hearing Notice Certification of Mailing & mailing labels G: \Engineering \Improvements \BA370 Carsons Hill Street Recon (2011( \PRELIM DESIGN \FEASIBILITY \Public Hearing \Item II. C. Public Hearing Carson's Hill Street Reconstruction Improvement No. BA -370, Resolution No. 2011- 15.docx w91r� RESOLUTION NO. 2011-15 o`� a ORDERING IMPROVEMENT FOR �c .�y CARSON'S HILL NEIGHBORHOOD STREET .,R,. RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -370 City of Edina WHEREAS, a resolution of the city council, adopted the 21St day of December, -2010, fixed a date for a council hearing on Improvement No. BA -370, the proposed improvement of Carson's Hill Neighborhood Street Reconstruction; and WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice of the hearing was given, and the hearing was held thereon .on the 18th :day of January, 2011, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: 1. Such improvement is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible to update aging infrastructure and address several issues including drainage problems, sanitary sewer problems and water main improvements and upgrades. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered. 3. The city engineer is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall prepare plans and specifications for the making of such improvement. 4. The city council declares its official intent to reimburse itself for the costs of the improvement from the proceeds of tax exempt bonds. Dated: January 18, 2011 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN . )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the . City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 18, 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com City Clerk 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 V City of Edina December 30, 2010 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -370 CARSON'S HILL NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS The Edina City Council will meet at Edina City Hall, on Tuesday, January 18, 2011, at 7:00 p.m., to consider the public hearing on roadway improvements for Caron's Hill Neighborhood. This hearing is being conducted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. This hearing has been called as a recommendation from staff. The proposed project would be constructed in the summer of 2011 with the assessment hearing occurring in the fall of 2012. The estimated project cost is $1,500,000. The cost of the project will be funded by special assessment. The estimated cost per assessable lot is $9,260 per residential equivalent unit. The assessments can be divided over a ten -year period with interes+ accumulating on the unpaid balance. The area. proposed to be assessed the cost of the proposed improvement includes the following: 5321 to 5401 Blake Rd, 6000 Eden Prairie Rd, 5600 to 5617 Heather Ln, 5500 to 5616 Highwood Dr, 5228 to 5522 Highwood-Dr W, 6000 to 6113 Idylwood Dr, 6100 to 6113 Jeffrey Ln, 6000 to 6117 Kaymar, Dr, 6000 to 6028 Leslee Ln, 5980. to 6029 Pine Grove Rd, 6000 to 6113 Saxony Rd. Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties which are considered to be benefited by the improvement. The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing. 952 - 927 -8861 City Hall FAX 952 - 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET TTY 952 =826 -0379 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 yyyyw.Cit]rofeCiina . cofil STATE OF MINNESOTA.) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE CITY OF EDINA I, the undersigned; being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following date December 30, 2010, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited _in the United States mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing for Carson's Hill Neighborhood Roadway Improvements, BA- 370 (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my-office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 12 days prior to the date of the hearing; and that I also sent said notice to the following corporations at the indicated addresses whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of said County Auditor. NAME ADDRESS WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this 36�day of 20 10 . k" a 4� Edina City[Clen LU02-fJOADIMMM 3211721210036 ! Harvey D. Trustee i 5600 Heather La Edina, MN 55436 61lln4 of MInSuOD 1 3211721240068 Gary C Johnson & Lance H Olson 5607 Heather La I Edina, MN 55436 3211721240064 James T & Erica J Zahn 5612 Heather La Edina, MN 55436 i 3211721240061 Ben and Janet A Jensen Presley 5617 Heather La Edina, MN 55436 3211721210009 Jung Lee Kim 1 5504 Highwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721210010 Gregory E & Kim E Nevins 5508 Highwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721210004 Christopher R & Katherine Johnson 5513 Highwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721230017 Paul T & Nan K Faust 60 Seagate Dr. #803 Naples, FL 34103 3211721240051 William Collins & Dana Ann Lajoie 5601 Highwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721230067 Daniel & Lee H Azar 5608 Highwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 T I e096SeAUMV19 3211721240062 David S & Karen J Rulifson 5604 Heather La Edina, MN 55436 i . i 3211721240063 Yi Liu & Guihong Chen 5608 Heather La Edina, MN 55436 3211721240060 Steven G McCormick i 5613 Heather La 1 Edina, MN 55436 2911721330019 Patricia M Christopulos 5312 Highwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721210002 Robert D Whyte & Julie A Grey 1 5505 Highwood Dr i Edina, MN 55436 :j 3211721210003 Shelley N C Holl 5509 Highwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 ,I 3211721210005 David A Ostlund & Megan Yuen 5517 Highwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 i 3211721210007 Marjorie J Fiedler 5525 Highwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721230068 John & Kelly Mccoy 5604 Highwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 I i 3211721240053 1 Michael R & Pamela J Levoir 1 5609 Highwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 i f T mead load ASe3.10} 1!:pa4S w1pnilsul eaS 0i aalad rgsalp%seUernft. 3211721210037 Thomas R Brambilla 5605 Heather La i Edina, MN 55436 i 3211721240059 Roberta Cole 5609 Heather La Edina, MN 55436 3211721240065 Brenda L Ram 5616 Heather La I i Edina, MN 55436 3211721210008 1 Martin Barke 5500 Highwood Dr 1 Edina, MN 55436 1 3211721220003 William C & Mary E Hollway 5507 Highwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721240050 Gretchen A Van Natta 5512 Highwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721210006 Jeffrey & Margie L Goodnuff 5521 Highwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721230069 i Bruce W Coles & Lucy C Peterson 5600 Highwood Dr i Edina, MN 55436 l 3211721240052 Adam & Stacy J Geiss 5605 Highwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 ! 3211721230066 j Rodric J & Phyllis C Pelo 5612 Highwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 laded paejj ®0965 31KIdIAl31 eland 8s0 7 I�I slagwl load &e3 alan 1 3211721240054 Paul Thomas Beutell 5613 Highwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 2911721330049 j Gene & Suzanne Haugland 5229 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 2911721330045 Cynthia Mcgarvey i 5236 Highwood Dr W j Edina, MN 55436 2911721330009 ! Charles E & Katharine White 5300 Highwood Dr W ' Edina, MN 55436 2911721330012 John Larkin 0 Larkin Plaza Wells, MI 49894 2911721330015 John S McDonald 5313 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 3211721220029 Thomas H &.Patricia L Igel 5404 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 3211721220026 Vera G Green 5409 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 3211721220032 John David & Jodi Lee Kelly 5416 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 3211721230065 2911721330043 Nathan P & Amanda J Kremer Carol L Doughman 5616 Highwood Dr 5228 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 2911721330044 2911721330048 Roger L & Yolanda M Scharton Gene & Suzanne Haugland 5232 Highwood Dr W 5229 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 i I jI i Edina, MN 55436 ! 2911721330047 James H & Kathleen R Zavoral 5239 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 i 2911721330011 j Penny N Winslow 5301 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 2911721330018 Christopher D Johnson I 5308 Highwood Dr W i Edina, MN 55436 ` 2911721330010 Susan Jo Lee 5316 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 j 3211721220027 John P & Sharon R Engelbert 5405 Highwood Dr W iEdina, MN 55436 3211 721220031 Robert & Jacque rt line Bakke 5412 Highwood;.Dr W Edina, MN 55436 3211721220024 Barbara Morley 6709 VERNON AVE. S. Edina, MN 55436 3211721220023 3211721220021 Thomas Cherne & Lee Robison Phillip & Susan C Little X421 Highwood Dr W i 5423 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 Edina, MN 55436 Y tajnjead lead Ase3 jo; 1 @09LSOAMMV91 Ii 4984S uorpallsul ea5 2911721330046 Barbara -L Schulz 5240 Highwood0i- W Edina, MN 55436 i 2911721330017 Ross A &'Laura L Haymaker 5304 Highwood:Dr W i Edina, MN 55436 2911721330013 Timothy J & Lori A Dolan 5309 Highwood Dr W j Edina, MN 55436 I► 3211721220028 Larry W &'Mary A Johnson 5400 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 l3211721220030 Sunny Sik.Kim 5408 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 3211721220025 Jerald J & Stella M Rezac 5415 Highwood ,Dr W Edina, MN 55436. : 3211721220033 Erie C & Helen J Reiter '5420 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 3211721220034 Julie A Jacques 5424 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 jaded peal ®0965 31tl1dIN3J.,pk8nll ash slaga'I lead Ase3 3211721220016 Karin L Van Dyke 5425 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 1 3211721220036 1 Harold Lazaretti 2007 Gift Trust 5432 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 i 3211721220002 Todd C & Susan M Young i 5511 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 3211721220056 Frank W Bonvino j 100 Wilderness Way #349 Naples. FL 34105 I 3211721220077 Thomas A & Krista J Doyle 6005 Idylwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721220079 Jaime & Aimee Garza 6015 Idylwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721220015 Scott A Harness & Eileen Mccarthy- Harness 6021 Idylwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721220014 James K & Karen J O'Neill 6101.ldylwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721220012 Mark J & Lori J Lamere 6109 Idylwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721230056 Randy M & Kristi L Olinger 6100 Jeffrey La Edina, MN 55436 @09&S@AWAVM 3211721220035 Amit & Padmini Dhingra 5428 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 !bled 4 sgpq smoft,; 3211721220017 James R Gray 5429 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 �l 3211721220004 ;1 3211721220052 Peter M & Deborah P Mahon 5501 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 j 3211721220057 Mark L & Lota Lou E Werth I 5514 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 3211721220018 Robert M & Michelle G Paule 6000 Idylwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 �I 3211721220078 Craig C & Ann P Lagorio 6009 Idylwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721220020 Corilus K & Rebecca A Weber 6016 Idylwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 .I j 3211721220009 I Sue Santrach 6100 Idylwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721220008 Richard & Elizabeth Anderson 6104 Idylwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 I 3211721220006 Jill Jelenko Angen 6112 Idylwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 j 3211721230038 John H Horns & Cathleen A Villas j Horns 6101 Jeffrey La Edina, MN 55436 1aintead lead Ase3 aol 4@aqS uolpn4sui eat Lon & Nancy Oberpriller i 5510 Highwood Dr W IEdina, MN 55436 l 3211721230004 Dustin & Jennifer Ordorff 5515 Highwood Dr W Edina, MN 55436 I i 3211721220076 Jeffrey A Wessels 6001 Idylwood -Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721220019 Brian T & June M Ostenso 6012 Idylwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721220010 Eric T & Carla C Dahl 6020 Idylwood Dr i Edina, MN 55436 3211721220013 James K & Karen J O'Neill 6101 Idylwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721220007 John L & Sharon-Howell 6108 Idylwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721220011 Robert & Kristine K Dickey i 6113 Idylwood Dr Edina, MN 55436 i 3211721230037 Richard N & Laura B Kuyath 6103 Jeffrey La Edina, MN 55436 jaded paad' ®0965 nvidwu @kand as0 j wow, u► a811�a3 el 11@0 3211721230055 Nick J & Patricia M Haddad 6104 Jeffrey La Edina, MN 55436 3211721230018 1 Mary'Kay Covey i 6112 Jeffrey La i Edina, MN 55436 3211721230063 Thomas S & Gayle Kohlbry Jr' 1 6004 Kaymar Dr Edina, MNr55436 3211721230060 JMS Custom Homes LLC 6016 Kaymar Dr Edina, MN 55436 32117212,30058 Jay D & Ilene S Goldberg 6024 Kaymar Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721230046 .Chad & Laura Vandertop 6029 Kaymar Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721230043 Richard A Grussendorf Jr 6101 KaymarDr Edina, MN 55436 l 321172'1230040 Elizabeth Patten 6108.Kaymar Dr Edina, MN 65436 3211721230006 John A & Marlene .'A West 6113 Kaymar Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721230016 Jeoffrey M & Kathleen J Allen 001 Leslee La Edina, MN 55436 Y I ®09 &54D VM 3211721230036 James V& Sarah S Davis 6105 Jeffrey La Edina, MN.55436 3211721230034 Julia M Goetsch 6113 Jeffrey La Edina, MN 55436 3211721230062 Richard D'& Mary K Stone 6.008 Kaymar Dr I :Edina, MN 55436 3211721230048 Jeanette L Swofford 6017 Kaymar Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721230047 Sarah L Chamberlain 6025 Kaymar Dr i Edina, MN 55436 ii 3211721230045 1 Thomas G & Stacy R Nevers i 6033 Kaymar Dr Edina, MN 55436 I 3211721230039 I + Alan P & Joan C Mercure 6104 Kaymar Dr I Edina, MN 55436 ;I 13211721230007 Glenn & Ann ePierskalla 6109.Kaymar:br Edina, MN 55436 3211721230005 j A T Hanson III & Kathleen J Hough 6117 Kaymar Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721220059 i Michael & Jennifer Mclenighan 6004 Leslee La Edina, MN 55436 i Tamtead 1184 Sse3 4 ways uo n�Isul ea5 i i d °ibled q sal.01420iientih. 3211721230035 Bernard J & Louise F Monahan 6109 Jeffrey La i Edina, MN 55436 3211721230064 Gregory'B Kalogerson 6000 Kaymar Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721230061 Christopher S & Margaret Davis 6012 Kaymar Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721230059 Rick C Bredice & Mary A Kenealy- Bredice 6020 Kaymar Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721230057 Steven A Woit j 6028 Kaymar Dr Edina, MN 55436 it 3211721230044 Linda C White i 6037 Kaymar Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721230042 Gary A Gabrielson 6105 Kaymar Dr Edina, MN 55436 3211721230041 Max A Boller 6112 Kaymar Dr IEdina, MN 55436 l J 3211721220058 Dennis J Rooney 6000 Leslee La Edina, MN 55436 3211721230015 Thomas J & Laura C Koch 6005 Leslee La Edina, MN 55436 I jaded paag j ®090 UV1.dW3J. ekany as0 ® .,III SIMM 188d AM udo>a°AiOA MA blipaj e1 zennsuco 3211721220060 Stephen R & Debra Yanda 6008 Leslee La . Edina, MN 55436 3211721230013 i David L & Lynn A Cookson 6013 Leslee La Edina, MN 55436 3211721220063 Kyle V & Kelly Quinn Kirsch 6020 Leslee La Edina, MN 55436 2911721340048 Neal D & Susan B Erickson 4567 80th Street West Minneapolis, MN 55437 3211721220081 Peter M Schmit & Kathi J Wright 6005 Pine Grove Rd. i Edina, MN 55436 i 2911721330037 Matthew C & Joyce W Peterson 6012 Pine Grove Rd Edina, MN 55436 3211721220044 Rolf J & Jennifer B Pederson 6017 Pine Grove Rd Edina, MN 55436 2911721330014 J Timothy & Colette Diege i 6024 Pine Grove Rd Edina, MN 55436 3211721220048 Winston & Norma Sletterdahl 6000 Saxony Rd i Edina, MN 55436 3211721220050 Timothy D Kehr 6008 Saxony Rd Edina, MN 55436 i3211721230014 James R & Joyce D Bloedel 6009 Leslee La Edina, MN 55436 3211721220062 Andrew S & Luann M Wyatt 6016 Leslee La Edina, MN 55436 j j 3211721220064 John C & Elizabeth L Skinner 6024 Leslee La Edina, MN 55436 I; 2911721330035 John C & Margaret H Miller 6000 Pine Grove Rd Edina, MN 55436 I I 1 2911721330036 ! Richard & Anne M Nygaard ' 6008 Pine Grove Rd Edina, MN 55436 I j 3211721220043 Michael R & Jennifer K Doyle 6013 Pine Grove Rd Edina, MN 55436 f 2911721330039 Joseph E & Mary Ann Clinton i 6020 Pine Grove Rd Edina, MN 55436 3211721220046 Jay W & M Kathryn Krachmer 6025 Pine Grove Rd Edina, MN 55436 3211721220049 Earl J & Melanie H Hylok 6004 Saxony Rd Edina, MN 55436 3211721220054 Gregory A & Stefanie A Trebil Jr 6009 Saxony Rd Edina, MN 55436 ibled 0eallp %saUenbI; 3211721220061 Jeffrey R & Cynthia S Engelking 6012 Leslee La Edina, MN 55436 3211721230012 Leonard L & Barbara M Stoltz 447 Foxtail Dr Longs, SC 29568 3211721230019 i Jeffrey S & Jennifer L Jarvey i 6028 Leslee La Edina, MN 55436 I 3211721210071 Jon A & Kathryn Perlinger 6001 Pine Grove Rd Edina, MN 55436 3211721220042 Richard H & Julie K Romens 6009 Pine Grove Rd Edina, MN 55436 2911721330038 Daniel W & Donna F Melville 6016 Pine Grove Rd Edina, MN 55436 3211721220045 I Navalpakkam R & Shanthi ! Ramakrishnan 6021 Pine Grove Rd Edina, MN 55436 3211721220047 Edna P Carlson c/o Richard Carlson j I6029 Pine Grove Rd Edina, MN 55436 3211721220053 Stephen D & Judith M Carle 6005 Saxony Rd Edina, MN 55436 3211721220051 Brian & Krista Doyle 6012 Saxony Rd Edina, MN 55436 I I ajnjeaj load Ase3 jo; jaded paaj 0090 3 VII& l �Gand as0 @094S ®�MVM if ia4s uolP l gas ® ♦ ;I �1 lam b wornaane AUAAn alline; el aanlnsuo:) 3211721220055 Barry J Bremer & Beth Turco 6015 Saxony Rd Edina, MN 55436 i 3211721220067 Chris & Mary Kalogerson 6100 Saxony Rd Edina, MN 55436 3211721220073 I Robert I & Nancy J Goerne 6105 Saxony Rd Edina, MN 55436 i 3211721220070 Matthew D Frauenshuh 6112 Saxony Rd Edina, MN 55436 T @09L5®AMNAVIM x.3211721220066 Carroll Britton 6020 Saxony Rd Edina, MN 55436 3211721220072 R Scott & Victoria L Forbes 6101 Saxony Rd Edina, MN 55436 i 3211721220069 Richard H & Mary L Hendrickson i 6108 Saxony Rd Edina,-MN 55436 3211721220075 Vel & Ambereen Angamuthu 6113 Saxony Rd Edina, MN 55436 3211721220071 Mark J & Sherrie J Hornung 6021 Saxony Rd Edina, MN 55436 I j 3211721220068 Holden J Hsiao & Yu Wen Mui 6104 Saxony Rd Edina, MN 55436 3211721220074 John A & Phyllis Tornquist 6109 Saxony Rd Edina, MN 55436 i II :I ! ! ! i I i• :I �I ii i I Tain;ead load Ase3 ao} ®- jaded paad g09Ls nvidwn skaw ash ' :39911S UOIPMsul Gars ® ♦ ;I 51®ge`i load ASe3 Jack .Sullivan Deb Mangen ent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 3:58 PM To: Jack Sullivan Subject: FW: Carson Hills project Attachments: street 2 001.jpg; street 1 001.jpg; street 3 001.jpg Debra Mangen;.MMC, Cty'Clerk i} S 952 -826 -0408 1 Fax 952-826 70390 DMande60d.edina.mn.us I www.QtvofEdina.com •y.; �.� r ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Kenealy - Bredice, Mary [mailtoMary.Kenealy- Bredice @minnetonka.kl2.mn.us] Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 20113:50 PM_ To: Deb Mangers Subject: FW: Carson. Hills project From: Kenealy- Bredice, Mary Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 20113:11 PM To: 'Kaylin Martin' ''ibject: RE: Carson Hills project Z�.. Z C I am attaching three pages that I scanned. Our fax is not working. Please also forward to engineering and the city council members. Thank you, Mary Kenealy- Bredice From: Kaylin Martin [mailto:kmartin @ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Tuesday,, January 18, 20112:58 PM To: Kenealy- Bredice; Mary Cc: Susan Howl Subject:. FW: Carson Hills project Thank you for your interest in the City of Edina. Your message was forwarded upon receipt to members of the Edina City Council. If I can be of additional assistance, please contact me. n �...,�� Kaylin Martin, Communications 'Assista_ nt e + R 952- 833 -9537 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 1 ° ,� kmartin@ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com /Police ...For Living, Learning, Raising.Families & Doing Business gym: Kenealy- Bredice, Mary [mailto : Mary. Kenealy - Bredice @minnetonka.kl2.mn.us] Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 20112:51 PM To: Kaylin Martin Subject: Carson Hills project i &VIA. DATE RECEIVED: City of Edina, Minnesota o e CITY COUNCIL I 480,1 West 50 Street • Edina, Mignesonta. 55424 (952) 927-8861 • (952) 927-7645 FAX • (612) 927-5461 TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL [:] SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATER MAIN ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: ❑ STREET LIGHTING OTHER: Oar c.,)?) ve-oo h,5j:C1 I Cb n The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE This petition was circulated by: OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) &N Ke_n(!!oAt - _bre_�i ce- 1 9 . M -a and lxpyyx bmis (,aee, KojoQer5m J, PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) Ko-umdr V 6n /a 6dtyo_Y Ve Q KW MGM r2 a qJ 6, NAM RJ ADDRES); PHONE There is space 4O.Ap Q esi aturesofijhjA*k. ' APRIL 2008 between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE This petition was circulated by: OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) &N Ke_n(!!oAt - _bre_�i ce- 1 9 . M -a and lxpyyx bmis (,aee, KojoQer5m J, PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) Ko-umdr V 6n /a 6dtyo_Y Ve Q KW MGM r2 a qJ 6, NAM RJ ADDRES); PHONE There is space 4O.Ap Q esi aturesofijhjA*k. ' APRIL 2008 A PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) This petition was circulated by: — t ne col l�b PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) v -- I - 6 NAME ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under the la►v, your telephone number is private data This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for refusing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. APRIL 2008 k EDINA CITY - %.. PETITION TO POSTPONE CARSON'S HILL STREET RECONSTRUCTION NO. BA -370 The following residents within the Carson's Hill Street Reconstruction Improvement No: BA -370 are not in favor of conducting the road construction at this time because the roadways are in good condition, the curbs and gutters are sound, street lights are not desired, sewers are not problematic nor is traffic. In view of the current economic conditions we respectfully request to postpone construction in this area. r- January 17, 2011 Dear Edina City Council Member: We are writing to express our thoughts regarding the Carson Hills Street Improvement Project. We do not speak for all residents in the Carson's Hill area but we believe that it is important for you as our representatives on the City Council to listen to your Edina residents. To date, there have been two informational meetings open to residents and presented by °the City engineers. The information presented by the engineers describes the nature of the project,' timeline and goals. The presentations have not included any information on how the decision was made to conduct the Carson Hills Street Impr-ovement-_project, the criteria to determining.that such a project is needed and no information on.how residents can voice their concerns about the value of this project and assessment residents are expected to pay'.. We asked the City Engineer Mr. Sullivan to provide the background on how Edina streets are evaluated for improvements and how such evaluations are prioritized when comparing all street evaluations in the city. Initially, Mr. Sullivan provided only an evaluation of the Carson Hills streets which shows ratings of streets based on an assessment rating between 1 and 100. Streets in the worst condition would be rated lower and those in the best condition rated higher. After multiple requests we did receive a fully assessment for the entire City, but in December. Now that we have some context for understanding the system for assessing street conditions we also have significant concerns regarding the overall communication process. The City engineers are providing information based on the expectation that the street improvement project will take place. As residents of Edina we must bear some burden for the cost of this project and the timing could:. not.be worse. Property values are not increasing, in fact, property values are going down. Taxation based on property values continues to increase. Given the current climate, it is critical that the Edina. City Council members understand that the Carson Hills Street Improvement project may not be in everyone's best interest at this time. The City needs to demonstrate that the improvements planned for our streets and the assessment placed on residents are justified in terms of overall property values. Residents should be able to realize an increase in their property values as a result of improvements. We do not see the value added component of this project. It is also unrealistic to assume that because the city has done few intermediate measures to maintain the streets,that now the ;i cost of replacing the pavement must be entirely paid for by special assessment. We do see an opportunity for the City of Edina to create work for city employees at a time when other municipalities are not taking on street improvement projects underwritten by their residents. We believe that the City of Edina needs to show proof that this street improvement project adds value. If this cannot be proven the City should not be permitted to proceed with this project. This would be a violation of state law. Respectfully, Rick.and Mary Bredice nen+, �eee MING FROM VIA: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE /CHANGE ORDER Mayor & City Council John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation Scott Neal, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 DATE: January 18, 2011 AGENDA ITEM: Item No. III. A ITEM DESCRIPTION: Change Orders — Edinborough Bathroom Addition Project DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED B OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE NA NA Company 1. Jan Lasserud Construction Company RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Jan Lasserud Construction Company $8,686.67 Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $8,686.67 ACCOUNT #: 5600.1720 GENERAL INFORMATION: Staff recommends approval of the following three separate change orders for the Edinborough Park Bathroom Project: 1. Handicap Accessible Door $1,990.42 2. Overhead Braces for Toilet Partitions $3,470.50 3. Exhaust Additions for Each Restroom $3,225.75 TOTAL $8,686.67 The Edinborough Park bathroom addition project has experienced a variety of change orders mostly due to unforeseen conditions which are typical with renovation projects. The total contract approved by Council for Jan Lasserud Construction Company is $96,250.00; however, once change orders collectively exceed 10% of the initial contract, all future change orders require Council approval. These three change orders totaling $8,686.67 are the only change orders that are in excess of 10% of the total contract and we do not anticipate any further change orders. In this case, it was determined late in the process that a handicap accessible door for the women's restroom is required by Building Code. It was also determined late in the process that additional exhaust ventilation in both restrooms is needed to meet current Building Code requirements. The purchase and installation of overhead braces for the toilet partitions is a request from staff to better stabilize the partition panels, which will be more durable and protect our investment in the quality material upgrades accepted as an add alternate to the base bid contract. That add - alternate accepted by the Council on July 20, 2010, was for an additional $3,200.00 for phenolic (high grade plastic) partitions for the bathrooms. In addition, without these ceiling mounted stabilization brackets, the panels will experience movement and slight loss of privacy. This is a 2010 Capital Improvement Plan pro O-a� John K p ios, Director for Edinborough Park. Edina Park and Recreation Department This Recommended bid is within budget not within budget JoKn Wallin, Finance Director Scott Neal, City Manager o Le 1 9,4ltt U.- REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. III: B. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer Date: January 18, 2011 Subject: 2011 Fuel Purchase Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: NA NA Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Yocum Oil Company, Inc. 1. $ As per budget — line item (State Contract # 442612) 1553.6581 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Yocum Oil Company, Inc. GENERAL INFORMATION: This purchase is to confirm the purchasing of fuel through a consortium of approximately 43 agencies that purchase 9- million gallons of fuel a year. We have committed approximately 70% of our annual purchase to this group purchase. The cost per gallon for the three types of fuel that we supply is: gasoline - $2.0948, bio- diesel summer blend - $2.2416, and bio - diesel winter blend - $2.2916. The City typically spends about $367,000 per year on fuel. The remaining 30% of our fuel purchase is through quotes that are typically equal to what is referred as the "Rack Average Price ", which is an average of regional refinery costs plus a profit margin. This purchase is through the Public Works Central Services Equipment Operation Budget. Signature The Recommended Bid is within budget not within budget G:\ Engineering \Adminlstration\ CORRPW \RFP- Supplles \ltemIII.B.2011 Fuel Purchase.docx Public Works Department 0 1 John Walk, Finance Director n i / 4 ( '' Scott heal, City Manager Ow e �\ �4 Cn E, o REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation VIA: Scott Neal, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 DATE: January 18, 2011 AGENDA ITEM: III.C. ITEM DESCRIPTION: 2011 Stainless Steel Truck Body and Tailgate Sander — Park Maintenance Department II DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED II BID OR QUOTE EXPIR^ATION DATE II NA N Company 1. Aspen Equipment Corporate Headquarters MN State Contract #443299 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Aspen Equipment Corporate Headquarters $24,544.91 (includes sales tax) Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $24,544.91 ACCOUNT #: 1650.6710 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is for purchase and installation of a 2011 nine -foot long stainless steel body and tailgate sander with LED light kit all to be mounted on the 2011 F450 Ford heavy duty one -ton cab /chassis that was previously approved by Council on December 7, 2010. This truck is used on a daily basis for landscaping during the summer months and for plowing and sanding paths and parking lots during the winter months. This purchase is funded under the 2011 Equipment Replacement Budqet. OX4:tl.'� Edina Park and Recreation John ios, Director Dnmenl This Recommended bid is - within budget not within budget p hn Wallin, Finance Director Scott Neal, City Manager O Le )f\ 0 \ rode REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV. A. From: Cell Smith Assistant to the City Manager ® Action Discussion Information Date: January 18, 2011 Subject: Local 49 Bargaining Unit Contract 2010 - 2011 ACTION REQUESTED: Approve contracts for 2010 and 2011. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The following items were agreed upon for 2010 and 2011. ARTICLE XXXI, INSURANCE. The employer shall contribute $775.00 per month in 2010 and $800.00 per month in 2011 for the City provided employee benefit coverage and life insurance and for optional benefits offered by the City though it's flexible benefit plan. ARTICLE XXXIV, DURATION. Two (2) year contract. APPENDIX Al. WAGES. % %for 2010. 1% for 2011. o� e,� cbR as RE PO RT/RECO M M E N DATI O N To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.B. From: John Keprios, Director ® Action Park and Recreation Department Discussion Information Date: January 18, 2011 Subject: Ordinance No. 2011 -01 An Ordinance Amending the Edina City Code Establishing a Memorial for Veterans ACTION REQUESTED: The Park Board recommends that the City Council approve Ordinance No. 2011 -01 an Ordinance amending the Edina City Code Establishing a Memorial for Veterans. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: At their December 14, 2010 meeting, the Park Board approved a recommendation from the Edina Veterans Memorial Committee to adopt Ordinance No. 2011 -01 which amends the Edina City Code to allow for establishing a Memorial for Veterans. State law requires that Cities who intend to construct, equip, maintain, supervise and control a Veterans Memorial must pass an Ordinance specifying that intent and the location of the Veterans Memorial. As stated in the Ordinance, the memorial shall be constructed at Utley Park at 50th Street and Wooddale Avenue. This location was proposed by the Veterans Memorial Committee and approved by the Park Board. Of the four different sites considered (Utley Park, Arneson Acres Park, Centennial Lakes Park and Williams Park), the Veterans Memorial Committee chose Utley Park because it best met the following criteria considered important in the site selection process: • Highly visible to the public • Private and /or serene space to accommodate private reflection • An area large enough to accommodate formal ceremonies • Accessible parking • Reasonable amount of shade • Aesthetically pleasing • Access to public restrooms ORDINANCE NO. 2011-01 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE EDINA CITY CODE ESTABLISHING A MEMORIAL FOR VETERANS THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 12 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding Section 1255 to provide as follows: Section 1255 — Memorial for Veterans 1255.01 Construction of Memorial. The City shall erect, equip and maintain a memorial in recognition of the services performed by veterans of the United States armed forces. The memorial shall be constructed at Utley Park at 50`h Street and Wooddale Avenue in Edina. 1255.02 Supervision of Memorial. The City's Park and Recreation Department shall be responsible for the supervision and control of the memorial following its completion. Section 2. This ordinance is effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Please publish in the Edina Sun Current Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor ms's REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV. C. From: Eric Roggeman Assistant Finance Director Action F-1 Discussion ® Information Date: January 18, 2011 Subject: Energy & Environment Commission — Green Step Cities Report INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Dianne Plunkett Latham of the City's Energy & Environment Commission will give a presentation to Council on the Green Step Cities program. ATTACHMENTS: City of Edina Energy and Environment Commission Green Step Cities Pilot Report • ._ iii _ _ . 14AD I I r I �I fill. if •�' If *� II. III' I - ,.il I Ili I,3 I �� . � � .I a Ir ,;. �• p , , ��I� III I Jj 111 ie I I li i�.i'. tihi fr•'� Op , m ill Ii II�, 1, 411j I� ��r �'I �I •III Fi ,� �'? ' I. Ip III I�" I ,��li nll'AI�I I�'1 f � 1✓7 I II I it Uf 111 I '�; ' .. .. .. _. II f -^l If' 4 � I' f I r III ,. If If � 1 �;� 411 I�11 Iii - - � I I II ! III II I�II'I� a IIliil'I� J II 11l1 6 I' If Ir 111 I - IIJ III ,II ;�I - �ti�l Ilr I I I al I I I f�'_ t I II if, m f - I�11� If�gl II� I �i11,'I�hm lip,I �l�Ilf�l F Ip , 12/19/2010 ��1i� II IID II � i Green I II II I II n- �. u 'fir I h ! r � II 91 q;'ll h., IIY 1�, 2 if .. II II to CitiesPilbt RepOrt . City of Edina Energy and Environment Commission of Edina Green Step Cities Pilot Report OVERVIEW: On October 9th, 2009 Edina was selected as one of five Green Step pilot cities. St. Louis Park, Bloomington, Falcon Heights and Victoria were also selected. Staff, Commissions, and the City Council will" work jointly on this project, with the assistance of Kristina Smitten, the Project Manager. The 28 Policy,.Areas which constitute the GreenStep Cities program were chosen by Urban Land Institute (ULI) and encompass the work of several Edina Commissions, including the Energy and Environment (EEC), Planning, Transportation Commission, Community Health Committee, as well as the Park Board. The following background information is from the ULI website: minnesota.uli.org The Urban Land Institute Minnesota (ULI MN) and the nationally recognized Regional Council of Mayors (RCM) actively engage public and private sector leaders to foster collaboration, share knowledge and join in meaningful strategic action to create thriving, sustainable communities. Focus areas include housing, transportation, the environment and job growth. Environmental objectives include the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions,'protection of natural resources and the support of healthy living. To foster the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions; ULI MN/RCM was selected by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to demonstrate best practices from the Minnesota Green Step Cities program in five RCM communities. Green Step Cities is a new program; the Green Step Cities Demonstration Project will provide a platform for application. The following goals have been adopted: • Green Step Cities best practices. Green Step Cities is an action - oriented voluntary program offering a cost - effective, simple pathway leading to implementation of sustainable best practices that focus on greenhouse gas reduction. Green Step Cities include best practices in the areas of: buildings and facilities, land use, transportation, environmental management, and, community and economic development. • Assessing and identifying 'opportunities. The Green Step Cities Demonstration Project will partner with five RCM cities to identify and implement Green Step Cities best practices. With support from the Green Step Cities Project Manager, the five demonstration cities will assess their current related practices and sustainability goals to identify areas of opportunities. In collaboration with the Center for Energy and Environment (CEE), best practices that are proven to have the greatest effect on reducing greenhouse gas emissions will be prioritized. • Communication and Learning. ULI MN/RCM encourages and expands peer -to -peer support and learning among Twin Cities regional mayors, and provides access to key expertise and technical resources. The Green Step Cities Demonstration Project will provide a base of knowledge, project review, and lessons learned through the i• a. I Citv of Edina implementation of Green Step Cities best practices. Outcomes and project examples will be documented, and findings will be made readily available on the ULI MN web site. Practices that have a proven ability to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and are readily replicable will be selected as priorities for promotion. GREENSTEP CITIES DEMONSTRATION PROJECT: The ULI MN/RCM Green Step Cities Demonstration Project seeks to address the. reduction of greenhouse gas emissions through advancing and implementing energy efficiency and sustainability best practices, and by motivating public officials to transition to a green economy. Goals include: • Educating leaders about Green Step Cities best practices, • Identifying actionable steps that are proven to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, • Promoting the implementation of these best practices, and • Communicating the results of these efforts through peer -to -peer advising: The Green Step Cities Demonstration Project activities include: 1. Selection of five demonstration RCM Cities (September 2009)- 2. Peer communication and learning (October 2009 — July' 2010);'',' 3. Review of selected cities' goals and policies that support the reduction of green house gas emissions (October- December 2009);,, 4. In partnership with each city, identify and prioritize Green Step Cities best practices (November 2009 - February 2010); 5. Provide suggested action -steps and access to experts to assist cities in the implementation of desired best practices (January-April 2010); 6. Assessment of best practices planned for implementation and their potential to reduce greenhouse gas reductions (April -May 2010); 7. Share and communicate results (June -Dec. 2010). 8. City Council approval (January 2011). RECOMMENDED BEST PRACTICES: Edina is rated as a Class A city for Green Steps City purposes, which requires the completion of a total of 16 best practices, nine of which are required, and six of which are optional. EEC recommends completing the following 15 best practices in addition to one additional optional sub step within best practice #24 Benchmarks, which counts as a floating best practice and constitutes the 16'' step. Council should note that the GreenSteps Cities packet presented at the 7 -6 -10 2• a City of Edina Council /EEC work session did NOT include the best practices for #12 Mobility and #23 Air Quality. Best Practice #12 on Mobility was omitted because the MPCA changed it from an optional best practice to a required best practice and Edina had not been so advised by the time of the 7 -6 -10 Work Session. Representatives of the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) and the Bike Edina Task Force (BETF) have agreed to implement Best Practice #12 on Mobility. Optional best practice #23 on Air Quality had been inadvertently omitted from the 7 -6 -10 Work Session packet due to an oversight. If Council has any questions about best practice #12 or #23, they should feel free to contact EEC Chair, Dianne Plunkett Latham. The following narratives describe each step, and lay out the background, timeline for implementation, and barriers to implement each best practice. The Energy and Environment Commission is recommending adoption of the following set of,16 best practices, and an endorsement by the City Council of continued involvement in the Green Steps Cities program through pursuit of a certification as a Green Step City. At a future meeting, the EEC will present a document outlining the needed resources for each best practice, including personnel, budgetary and policy requirements. ,,Staff will conduct a review of the best practices and identify projects and programs where capital dollars have been allocated, and,where;there is overlap between practice and planning for future projects and programs contained in this document. EEC's 16 recommended best practices represent EEC's best judgment as to those practices most useful to the City of Edina, as well as those practices which are achievable. It is acknowledged, however, that once resources are identified for each practice, that one or more steps or sub steps may not prove achievable, or that an alternative step or substep may be better suited to the City of Edina's needs. In that case, a different step or substep may need to be substituted. Consequently, one should not assume that all the steps and substeps listed below are necessarily those, which will ultimately be implemented. Conversely, not listing a step or substep below does not necessarily mean that it will not be completed. 3• of Edina Best Practice: #1 Efficient Existing Public Buildings (Required Step) Description: Work with utilities and others to assess and finance energy and sustainability improvements of existing public structures. Current Practice: The B3 database of city building data is complete and is currently being updated with the utility data. City buildings have not had full energy audits, nor have they been ranked for energy performance. The City has a five - year Capital Improvement Plan that can be utilized to fund building improvements internally. This may be augmented by grants or other revenue sources specific to projects. Best Practice as it applies to Edina: (Substeps #1 and #2 are required plus one additional'step must be completed) Substep #1 (Required): Enter yearly public building data into the Minnesota B3 database'and; rank buildings in regard to energy performance. The City will have utility data on its buildings over 5,000 square feet -in the B3 Database by July 2010; other buildings can be added to the database as needed. Substep #2 (Required): Audit all buildings in the bottom third of energy performance ranking and implement all energy efficiency opportunities with a payback under 5 years. City buildings will need energy audits completed, either through a utility sponsored program or an independent third party. Substep #6 (Optional): Internal Loan Fund — Complete Barriers to implementation: 1) Human and financial resources needed for conducting the initial audit and continuously monitoring energy consumption. 2) The financial resources to implement the energy efficiency opportunities - identified by the audits. Step Effectiveness — Buildings make up 60% of carbon emissions by the City. Best Practice #1 is essential to curb carbon emissions in a meaningful way. Howe yet, implementation of the substeps, such as the Audit requirement, may incur substantial organizational and financial barriers. Staff will work with Xcel and Centerpoint Energy to determine the cost of audits and establish a budget for the implementation of this step. Implementation schedule: This step can be implemented in phases over a three =year period, beginning in January, 2011, and ending in January 2014. Best Practice: #2; Efficient. Existing Private Buildings (Optional Step) Description: Increase Energy Efficiency in Private Buildings and Lighting Current Practice: The city does not have a specific energy efficiency program for private buildings. Edina has a watering ordinance as Yell as a two tier conservation rate structure. Best Practice as it applies to Edina 1: (A minimum of two substeps must be completed) Substep #2: (Optional) Working with a local utility, tailor a utility conservation improvement program (CIP) for your city. Substep #3: (Optional) Promote residential energy efficiency programs in city mailings /newsletters. To implement sub step #2 and #3, a project team consisting of City staff, EEC members, CEE, Xcel, and Centerpoint has been established. The message in the city mailing is being developed with content from Xcel and Centerpoint, and distributed through the Education Outreach Working Group's efforts. There will be close coordination on educational efforts like the 4th of July parade. 4• of Edina Substep #5b: (Optional) Implement a robust watering ordinance and conservation rate structure — This sub step is complete. Barriers to implementation: Finding sufficient volunteers to champion the residential project rollout in the neighborhoods. Financial barriers for project implementation, mailings, flyers, etc, etc. Step Effectiveness — No Comments Implementation schedule: Multi -phase plan that begins in May 2010: 1. Spring 2010 a. Focus on Saver Switch and Appliance Rebates (refrigerator recycling) and the Home Energy Squad (HES) program b. Door hanger project in Morningside. c. Use liquor stores and Warner - Stellian to promote refrigerator recycling Spring 2010 and ongoing d. Look for opportunities to promote city-wide: Cable TV / PSA promotion; Magnets and/or buttons e. City will create internet links to utility programs f. 7 -3 -10 Parade: distribute information & buttons /magnets 2. Fall 2010 (Beginning mid to late August, continuing through' October/November)' a. A flyer in the city utility bill, developed by the city and approved,by Centerpoint and Xcel, that emphasizes home audits, Home Energy Squad (HES), appliance rebate, and saving energy as the heating season approaches. b. Door hangers with the same themes will be distributed (Morningside, Highland, other neighborhoods) c. Develop and include `testimonials' for neighborhood HES meetings d. Develop competition for energy savings — City council v. EEC v. Edina Go Green (EGG) Publicize quarterly to encourage community interest e. Highland neighborhood /school outreach program 3. Edina Day of Service— 10/9/2010 a. Have a major focus. on energy —home audits, HES. 4. Coordination with School District a. Fall 2010 -- ,Energy challenge between EHS schools? b. PSA energy announcements at football games? c. Coordinate with EHS on Edina Day of Service energy projects Best Practice: #6 Comprehensive Plan (Required Step) Description: . Adopt a Comprehensive Plan and tie regulatory ordinances to it. Current Practice: The 2008 Comp Plan Update includes mixed -use housing as a goal, and provides areas in the city to accommodate such uses. It also includes a full -scale report on bicycle and pedestrian access prepared by the Bike Edina Task Force (BETF) in conjunction with the Transportation Commission. In 2009, the Planning Commission began meeting twice a month to update the zoning ordinance, and address any inconsistencies between the city's ordinances and the Comprehensive Plan. Their work continues, and will likely be done this year. The Comprehensive Plan addresses land use, zoning,'transportation, water resource, environmental, and housing issues. The Comprehensive Plan is updated every ten years, according to state statutory requirements. The Metropolitan Council oversees the formulation and implementation of each city' "s comp plan. Best Practice as it applies to Edina: (Substeps #1 and #2 are required) Substep #1: (Required) Adopt a Comp Plan that is less than 10 years old. Complete Substep #2: (Required) Demonstrate that regulatory ordinances comply with the Comp Plan including having the zoning ordinance explicitly referenced in the Comp Plan. 5• r City of Edina Barriers to implementation: This plan represents very few barriers to implementation, apart from the more typical budgetary and community- related matters that arise to block or prevent implementation. Since it is a required document in state law, it is typically understood to be a guiding mechanism for planning activities. Implementation schedule: The City is currently in the implementation phase of the updated comp plan. This implementation will continue over the next eight years, and will be formally reviewed at the end of that period as part of the decennial update of the comp plan. Staff and elected officials will use this document as an overall guide for development, changes to transportation facilities, and other regional planning issues during that time. Changes to the document must follow a prescribed process which includes community input and approval by the City Council, followed by review and approval by the Metropolitan Council. Step Effectiveness: This step is a required step. The statute prescribing the requirement for Comp Plans, has been in place for about 40 years. No changes are recommended. Best Practice: #11 Complete Streets (Required, Step) Description: Increase safety and mobility options for pedestrians, bicycles and all other vehicles, as well as creating more inviting public spaces and increased economic viability of businesses, while reducing maintenance costs, reducing storm water management, plus reducing emergency response times. Current Practice: Edina has a City of Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan, which is not fully implemented. See http: / /www.ci. edina. mn. us/ PDFs/ CompPlan /Final/Microsoft %20Word %20- %20Chapter% 207% 20Transportation %20Bike %20November %202008.pdf. Edina also has a sidewalk plan, but it is not fully implemented. See p. 23 of the Travel Forecasting section of the Comprehensive Plan at: hgp:// www. ci. edina. mn. us/ PDFs/ CompPlan /Final/Microsoft %20Word %20- %20Chapter% 207% 20Transportation% 20Travel %20Forecasting %20November %202008. pdf Traffic calming measures such as sidewalks or bicycle routes have been implemented on a few streets, but the vast majority of streets do, not have sidewalks or bicycle routes. The City of Edina does not have a Complete Streets plan involving all streets, only the arterials. Best Practice as it applies to Edina: (Substep #I is required plus two additional substeps) Substep #1: "(Required) Complete Green Streets Policy — The Bicycle Transportation Plan and sidewalk plan need to be integrated into a Complete Green Streets plan for all streets with a schedule for the implementation of each segment. Substep #4: (Optional) Identify and Remedy non - complete green street segments by, for example, adding a bike lane or sidewalk. Substep #6: (Optional) Traffic Calming measures on at least 1 street redevelopment project — This should be expanded beyond the proposed bicycle lanes for the current West 70°i project. Each time a street is resurfaced, sidewalks and bicycle routes should be added as per the Bicycle Transportation Plan and sidewalk plan and reviewed by the Transportation Commission as well as the Bike Task Force. Barriers to implementation: Opposition to sidewalks due to: 1) Construction costs assessed to residents living in the designated travel -shed 2) Homeowner winter shoveling requirement for most sidewalks 6• of Edina 3) Reduction of privacy 4) Hazard of pedestrians crossing the homeowner's driveway Opposition to bike routes due to: 1) Loss of parking in some cases for bicycle lanes 2) Hazard of cyclists crossing in street below homeowner's driveway. Step Effectiveness — The bar is too low in some substeps. For example, traffic calming measures should be required for more than one street. Implementation schedule: Chair Latham informally spoke with the Bike Edina Task Force (BETF) Chair and gave a PowerPoint program on the GreenStep Cities program to the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) on May 20, 2010, with emphasis on the Complete Green Streets BP #11. The Transportation Commission (ETC), and BETF Chair informally expressed an interest in participating in BP #11 and await City Council approval for, becoming a GreenStep City, after which the ETC and BETF could formally begin working with, staff to confirm which BPS #11 sub steps to undertake, as well as develop a strategy for their implementation. Best Practice: #12 Mobility Options (Required Step) Description: Promote active living and alternatives to single - occupancy oartravel. Current Practice: The City of Edina has a local bike'routes map, produced by a':private company, which is available free at City Hall. The City comprehensive plan has maps showing walking zones for 'business, school and parks. Transit information is also available at City Hall. The City received a grant for bike racks ih.2010 and 12 new racks will be installed at local schools and the Community Center, plus 12 new racks at Centennial Lakes, Braemar and Garden Park. The City of Edina does not have jurisdiction over Metro Transit,and therefore oannot increase the number of bus facilities, signage, benches or shelters. The City can consult with Metro Transit and request more service, but Metro Transit makes the final decision. Metro Transit has a program ( http : / /www:metrbtransit.orWfederal -and- state - tax- resources.aspx) for City employers, which offers transit passes as. a benefit with pre -tax dollars. Best Practice as it applies to Edina: (A minimum of two substeps are required) Substep #le: (Optional) Promote walking, biking and transit by an active living campaign in concert with your local community health board — The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) will be focusing on "active transportation" such as developing the policies.and programs that support the implementation of complete streets and improve the if transportation right of way for walking and biking. The Bike Edina Task Force (BETF) helps to lead 3 annual community rides, including,the Annual-Ride with the'Mayor. The BETF also offers monthly skills ride events to increase bicycling skills and riding options in Edina. The BETF also'organizes the annual Bike to Work event starting at the 50th and France area. The BETF promotes safe bicycling with its website, free wallet cards, and hosting information tables at several community' events throughout the (year. Substep #2, (Optional) Launch a Safe Routes to School program with educational, public health and other partners - Edina received a Safe Routes To School grant a couple of years ago, and did the speed zone study. The BETF successfully completed a Bicycle Rodeo at Highlands Elementary in 2010 and is working with Edina Schools to continue similar events for 2011 to increase both bicycling and walking for both staff and students. Substep #4 (Optional) Promote carpooling or on -demand ridesharing among community members, city employees, businesses, high schools and institutions of higher education - When the City reviews a new development, there is opportunity to attach conditions related to travel demand management. Typically, this is a section of the transportation impact analysis report that is under- developed. The focus is on motor vehicle traffic, with very little analysis of pedestrian, bike, or transit. The City should strengthen its travel demand management conditions and more firmly require both an analysis of pedestrian, bike and transit movements as well as require, through zoning, facilities for pedestrians, cyclists and transit users. 7• V City of Edina Barriers to implementation: 1) Obtaining sufficient publicity to educate the public. 2) Obtaining cooperation from multiple governmental units. Step Effectiveness — Adequate Implementation schedule: The respective chairs of ETC and BETF proposed undertaking substeps #1 e, #2 and #4, subject to confirmation by those bodies. Two years are estimated to complete these substeps. , Best Practice: #15 Purchasing (Required Step) Description: Adopt an environmentally preferable purchasing policy. Current Practice: The existing Purchasing Policy of the City of Edina does not consider environmental factors in its purchasing directives. Best Practice as it applies to Edina: (Substep #I is required plus at least one optional step) The Energy and Environment Commission approved a new Environmental Purchasing Policy at its April 8, 2010 meeting for Edina City Council for approval. The Environmental Purchasing Policy includes several of the substeps of this Best Practice. Substep #1: (Required) Adopt a policy or administrative policy directing that the city purchase only: a. Energy Star certified equipment and appliances and, b. Paper containing at least 30% post- consumer recycled content. Substep #4: (Optional) Require the purchase of U.S. EPA Water Sense - certified products for all product categories covered by the Water Sense program. Barriers to implementation: 3) Creation of a Purchasing Task Force: Include city employees from the various city departments. The Task Force must show commitment and leadership to effectively transform and, if necessary abandon, current purchasing practices. 4) Education and information sharing: City staff must keep up to date on the environmental impact, and best disposal practices of purchased products and'the availability of new, more environmentally friendly products. The Task Force must effectively communicate this information among the various departments. Step Effectiveness — The step is adequate as defined. Implementation schedule: 1) Approval of the, Environmental Purchasing Policy by City Council — 4 months 2) Creation of Purchasing Task Force — 6 months 3) Creation of an implementation strategy by the Purchasing Task Force — 6 months to 1 year 4) Implementation of purchasing recommendations — 1 year or longer. It will be based on the best practice of continuous improvement. 8• City of Edina Best Practice: #16 Urban Forest (Required Step) Description: Increase city tree and plant cover. Current Practice: The City of Edina has received the Tree City USA designation in the past, but let it lapse. It should not be difficult to get recertified as a Tree City USA. The City of Edina, has no tree preservation`ordinance. The City of Edina has landscaping performance standards in 850. 10, but they do not require any tree, cover in parking lots. The main street area of Edina at 50'h and France is landscaped with trees within the sidewalk area including Dutch Elm Disease resistant Elms. Best Practice as it applies to Edina: (At least two substeps must be completed)'' The Urban Forest Task Force (UFTF) recommended undertaking the following substeps: Substep #1: (Optional) Qualify as a Tree City USA. City Forester Tom Horwath will draft the application for 2011. Substep #4: (Optional) Maximize tree planting along your main downtown street ,7 Complete Substep #5: (Optinal) At least two practices must be chosen to count this sub step. The UFTF recommends: d.Enact Ordinances to protect trees in the development process and to enhance the urban forest. The UFTF has drafted an Edina Tree Preservation Ordinance (ETPO) based on the unsuccessful ETPO ordinance proposed in Edina in 2002. Note that green parking lots is found under BP '# 17' Efficient Stormwater 'management under 5d. The UFTF is undertaking recommendations for green parking lots. Barriers to implementation: The 2002 Edina Tree Preservation Ordinance (ETPO), on which the proposed UFTF amendments are based, was defeated. Concerns expressed by the'Planning Commission and the City Council in 2002 included the increased involvement of the City Forester, who, as a part-time employee, could not comply with additional duties, as well as concern for making the entire city a tree preservation zone, which subjects residents to a tree removal permit requirement each time they wish to relandscape. The proposed ETPO does not involve City Forester time and applies only to public property or.to private property where the level of development requires that the project come before the Planning Commission for approval. Thus, it is believed that the barriers to implementation have been overcome. Step Effectiveness — Satisfactory. Implementation schedule: 1) Achieve Tree City USA certification by 2011. 2) 'Ordinance revisions to be implemented in 2011. Best Practice: #17 Efficient Stormwater Management (Required Step) Description: Prevent stormwater generation Current Practice: The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District (NMCWD) has jurisdiction over surface water quality in Edina, with the exception of northeast Edina where the Minnehaha Watershed District (MWD) has jurisdiction. The policy of the district is to require that onsite retention and regional water quality treatment systems operate together to provide complete and effective runoff management through managing volumes, providing effective water quality treatment to remove sediment, pollutants & nutrients from stormwater before discharging to surface water bodies and wetlands and to provide nondegradation of surface water bodies in the watershed. City already meets V retention rate 9• City of Edina based on NMCWD requirements. The City of Edina is utilizing pervious pavers throughout the Edina Promenade. Edina encourages the use of better site design and low impact development as well as other techniques that minimize impervious surfaces or incorporates volume control purposes. A stormwater utility exits with fees examined every 2 years. There are variable fees based on land use. Edina currently charges $18.13 per home per quarter for storm drainage. Property owners may petition for lower rates if they can prove reduction. Rain gardens have been added to Highlands and Concord Elementary schools. The City of Edina does not use coal tar products. Construction site operators must conform to NPDES Phase II, Watershed District and City ordinances pertaining to erosion & sediment, controls and waste controls as stated within the May 2006 BMP Implementation Program of the City of Edina's Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan. Best Practice as it applies to Edina: (At least one substep must be completed) Substep #1: (Optional) Complete the Blue Star City stormwater management assessment and achieve a minimum threshold of specific activities detailed in this program. The Nonpoint Education for Municipal Officials (NEMO) workshop scheduled for February 7, 2011 will include information about the Blue Star program and the City will consider a time table to complete the assessment. Substep #4: (Optional) Create a stormwater utility, which uses variable "fees to incentivize stormwater reduction and fund community stormwater infrastructure and assistance. The EEC Water Quality Working Group (WQ WG) will research the potential of creating an incentivized fee plan and will make a recommendationTor future action. Substep #5: (Optional) Adopt and implement design standards or guidelines for renovations or new construction in the city addressing at least one of the following: • Rain gardens • Green roofs with or without cisterns & water /grey water reuse systems • Green alleys Green parking lots The WQ WG will research design and guideline standards for'rain gardens, green roofs, green alleys and parking lots and will make recommendations to the ECC for potential ordinance development. Substep #6: (Optional) Adopt, with modifications as needed, the model Stormwater and Erosion & Sediment Control Ordinance. A Draft report has been prepared by Barr Engineering, currently under review. Barriers to implementation: • Potential resistance from citizens /commercial properties to higher usage fees (Step #4). Step Effectiveness - The creation and/or adoption of standards /ordinances that reduce the overall amount of imperious surfaces will lead to lessening the overall volume of drainage that enters the stormwater system and diminishes the negative effects on wetlands and surface waters within the watershed area. Implementation schedule: • Comprehensive Water Management Plan Draft November 2009 is now under review and should be back to City Council for review in 6to 8 months. • A full set of BMP (Best Management Practices) included in Table 1 of Storm Water Pollution Prevention May 2006 includes extensive timeline for storm run -off issues beginning September 2007. • EEC will provide ordinance recommendations to City Council within 18 months. • EEC will continue to monitor progress and make additional recommendations if needed. io • I , of Edina Best Practice: #18 Green Infrastructure (Optional Step) Description: Use parks and trails to enhance the city's green infrastructure. Current Practice: The city of Edina has no policy on low maintenance native landscaping. The 1995 Edina Turf Management Plan was last updated in 2001. Well #14 is used to irrigate the City of Edina's Braemar Golf Course, which is also certified as an Audubon Cooperative Sanctuary. Edina has community involvement inland restoration and stewardship in the form of community initiated buckthorn busts. When a group volunteers to remove buckthorn, the City Forester gives them a presentation on how to do it. The City provides the roundup and tools such as weed wrenches and hand saws. The City hauls the buckthorn to the city brush dump at Braemar Arena. From there the City of St Paul District Energy comes to chip it up and, for a low fee, haul it to St Paul to be burned for energy. Best Practice as it applies to Edina: (At least 3 substeps must be completed),, The Urban Forest Task Force (UFTF) recommended undertaking the following three sub steps: Substep #6: (Optional) Park Management Standards of: a) Low Maintenance native landscaping — UFTF recommends Park Board institute the following policies: 1) 50% Minnesota native plantings for new plantings in city parks excluding Edinborough & Arneson Park 2) A policy similar to Minneapolis with a list of plants NOT recommended for planting in Edina Parks. This includes those on the Minnesota Dept. of Agriculture's noxious weed list, or which are invasive and destructive to native plant communities, as well as those which have chronic insect/disease pest problems that would result in higher maintenance costs and/or early mortality rates. b) Organic or Integrated Pest Management A Task Force to, update the Turf Management Plan (TMP) was established at the 4 -8 -10 EEC meeting. Germana Paterlini will represent EEC, Ellen Jones will represent Park Board and Vince Cockriel will represent city staff. Mary Jo Kingston will represent the Community Health Commission. New organic practices and products have become available since 2001 and need to be evaluated and incorporated into the TMP, The TMP's List of noxious weeds also needs to be updated to comply with state statute, as well as provision made "for woody invasive control with appropriate chemicals. c) Sources of Non potable water for irrigation— Complete -City well #14 was taken out of service in approximately 2006 due to elevated Radium 226 levels and was repurposed to irrigate Braemar Golf Course. Substep #7: (Optional) Certify Golf Courses for Audubon Cooperative Sanctuary — Complete for the Braemar and the Fred Richards golf courses. In 2009 the. EEC., recommended to the Park Board that city parks be certified as Audubon Cooperative Sanctuaries as well. This is especially applicable to Bredesen Park, which is Edina's passive nature center. Substep #9: (Optional) Develop a program that involves community in land restoration and stewardship — A program exists but needs to be expanded. Maintenance after noxious weed removal must be funded and institutionalized. Barriers to implementation: Community land restoration is hampered by 1) insufficient funding for noxious weed removal and subsequent maintenance, 2) lack of a full -time City Forester, and 3) insufficient numbers of volunteers to deal with Edina's 600 acre parkland noxious weed infestation. Step Effectiveness — This step is adequate. Implementation schedule: Turf Management Plan update and the Low Maintenance Native Landscaping policy implementation in 2011. ii • • Y City of Edina Best Practice: . #19 Surface Water Quality (Optional Step) Description: Improve local surface water quality Current Practice: The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District ( NMCWD) has jurisdiction over surface water quality in Edina, with the exception of northeast Edina where the Minnehaha Watershed District (MCWD) has jurisdiction. MCWD has had a project to improve water quality in Pamela Lake. Macroinvertebrate testing is being done by authority of the MCWD at Minnehaha Creek in Utley Park in Edina, as well as 4 other sites along Minnehaha creek. MCWD lakes were tested for mercury as well as Citizen Assisted Monitoring Program (CAMP) evaluations of clarity, chlorophyll and nutrients. Water is currently being tested in Edina by NMCWD at Cornelia, Mirror, Arrowhead and Indian Head Lakes. The Conservation League of Edina (CLE) began water quality testing in 2004 at Lake Harvey, Pamela Lake, Lake Edina and Lake Cornelia. In 2005 CLE dropped Lake Harvey and completed testing for Pamela, Edina and Cornelia lakes. From 2006 to 2009 only Lake Cornelia was tested. Edina's setback requirements are consistent with the DNR's regulations and in a few locations are more restrictive than what the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources allows. City of Edina is working on an inventory on all public sites, which will be completed in 2 years. Edina falls within two watershed districts and it is the districts that have regulatory authority to determine the rules for natural buffer zones of native vegetation around ponds and wetlands in order to provide habitat and improved water quality. The City partners with the.NMCWD and MCWD to educate the public regarding wetland protection and the importance of creating and maintaining vegetative buffers. Due to lot configurations, some land use and property ownership limits the ability to provide buffer zones, resulting in the watershed districts having made some allowances. Edina's Public Works Department has developed a public outreach program to promote best management practices as outlined in its May 2006 report. Programs and literature distribution began in September 2007 and will run through May 2011. Best Practice as it applies to Edina: (Substep #4 is required plus at least one additional substep must be completed) Substep #3: (Optional) Adopt measurable lake, stream and wetland health indicators or improvement targets, work with private and non - profit organizations to support citizen education efforts and involve stakeholders in actions to attain the targets, and annually report' successes and failures. Targets may' include measures such as trophic state, pollutant levels, health measures, water levels, and recreational carrying capacity. The Water Quality Working Group of EEC will draft a petition to NMCWD to fund water testing on Arrowhead and Indian Lakes. Residents around these lakes have expressed interest in participating in improving water quality and getting the lake associations involved would likely be achievable. Substep #4: (Required) Adopt a shore -land ordinance consistent with MN Dept of Natural Resources rules as modified. The Water Quality Working Group of EEC will review MPCA's Minimum Impact Design Standards (MIS) and determine future recommendations for stricter standards. The Water Quality Working Group of EEC worked with 9MCWD and MWD to plan a Nonpoint Education for Municipals (MEMO) workshop held 11 -8 -10, with part II scheduled for 2 -7 -11 Barriers to implementation: • It is difficult to find volunteers for water quality testing for the months of April through October. • There may be public opposition to ordinance revisions that protect water quality when thepublic's perception of aesthetics is compromised, or when convenience is compromised. • Limited city staffing. Step Effectiveness — For cities that are part of a watershed district, this step needs to be augmented with activities that cities can undertake apart from, and/or jointly with watershed districts. For example: Educate the public to the direct relationship /connection between surface water quality and storm water management including the following: 12 • Y of Edina a) The benefits of vegetation buffers at shorelines vs. mowing to the shoreline. Research potential shoreline vegetation buffer ordinance adoption for all public and private shorelines. b) Minimize use of chemicals to control duckweed and educate the public to the different roles of water vegetation, their benefits and causes. Educate the public on the benefits /differences between duckweed and algae. Research availability of less toxic materials to control algae and make recommendations for eliminating the use of fluridone. c) Gain a better understanding of inspection & maintenance schedules on private and public holding ponds. d) Coal -tar usage - Prepare and recommend to Edina's City Council the adoption of an,ordinance that bans private /commercial usage of coal -tar products, similar to White Bear Lake's ordinance. EEC will also work for a state -wide ban of coal tar. e) Lawn chemicals — The Turf Management Task force is reviewing and will make recommendations. f) Create a pilot program at a local residential lake utilizing the Citizen Assisted, Monitoring Program (CAMP) methodology Implementation schedule: Petition for water testing will be submitted to NMCWD for implementation for spring of 2011. • Education pieces beginning to discuss the effects of stormwater and impervious surface practices for commercial and residential uses, changing lawn practices, driveway maintenance, etc. are currently being generated through a number of different mediums and outlets: articles in Sun Current, City of Edina's website and NMCWD materials. • EEC will monitor outreach program and supplement with additional recommendations over the next few years. Best Practice: #22 Managing Solid Waste Description: Increase Waste Reduction, Reuse and Recycling Current Practice: The city of Edina has an organized hauling contract for residential recycling with payment made on the resident's utility bill. Residential solid waste and yard waste are removed via an open hauling system having six participating haulers where residents pay haulers directly. One residential solid waste hauler provides an organics collection option. City schools separate their organics. Recycling is not required for commercial businesses. There is currently a pilot project in place in two city parks to provide recycling bins for park users. This program will be evaluated prior to further placement of bins in city parks. Best Practice as it applies to Edina: (Substep #2 is required plus at least one of substeps #4 - #8 must be completed) The Recycling and Solid Waste Working Group will be undertaking sub steps #2, and #5 as short term goals, plus sub step #6 as a long term goal. Substep #2: (Required) Adopt and meet aggressive goals for the overall percentage diversion of currently disposed waste from city operations into recycling and organics collection. Overall waste generation: a) Provide recycling bins in all parks; b) Reduce paper use & junk mail; c) The forthcoming RFP for city operations will include an organics component and the municipal operations will begin source separating organics at all locations; d) Implement a facility-wide policy to reduce the use of bottled water in municipal facilities; e) Implement a facility-wide policy that only compostable table ware will be used at municipal facilities. Substep #5: (Optional) Arrange for a residential or institutional organics collection - Complete — The elementary, middle and high schools have organized their own Source Separated Compostable Materials (SSCM) collection program. Vierkant Disposal, Inc. offers residents a yard waste and (SSCM) co- collection program. 130 of Edina Substep #6: (Optional) Organized Hauling — Invite MPCA's Peder Sandhei to give a PowerPoint presentation to a City Council Work Session on MPCA's "Analysis of Waste Collection Service Agreements" published in June 2009 with a goal of amending MN Stat I I5A.94. Residents should be surveyed as to their hauling preferences. Barriers to implementation: 1) Park Recycling Bins - Difficulties in raising funding for outdoor recycling bins, which cost from $415 - $665/bin for forty parks, given that the size of each park generally requires more than one bin. 2) Requiring Commercial Recycling — A sufficient education program must be undertaken to reduce push -back. Cooperation is needed from business organizations such as the Chamber of Commerce, Rotary, etc. City Ordinances need to be amended. 3) Organized Residential Solid Waste Hauling — MN Stat 115A.94 must, be amended & residents educated. Step Effectiveness — Best Practice #22 should be required. Implementation schedule: 3) Park Recycling Bins — 2 Years 4) Requiring Commercial Recycling — 2 years 5) Organized Residential Solid Waste Hauling — 3 years Best Practice: #23 Local Air Quality (Optional) Description: Prevent generation of local air contaminants Current Practice: The City of Edina Health Department works closely with`the Minnesota Department of Health to research concerns associated with mold, radon, tobacco smoke, carbon monoxide and chemical emissions from products and furnishings. These pollutants,can seriously impact public, health, the environment and quality of life. The City of Edina does not have any specific guidelines for public spaces that reduces or eliminates the distribution of noxious air contaminants that are affecting a growing number of individuals and children. Asthma and other respiratory conditions are on the rise, yet other than banning cigarette smoking from public places, there are no significant rules to inhibit the introduction of many kinds of invisible air pollutants that cause significant health concerns. Best Practice as it applies to Edina: (At least two substeps must be completed) Substep #2.: (Optional) Regulate outdoor, wood burning, using model ordinance language, performance standards and bans as appropriate for at least one of the following: ■ Recreational burning ■ Outdoor wood boilers Substep #3: (Optional) Conduct one or more education/behavior change campaigns on the topics below and document: ■ Decreased vehicle idling in specific locales or by specific fleets ■ Increased sales by retail stores of low and no -VOC (Volatile Organic Compounds) household products ■ Replacement of gasoline - powered equipment with lower polluting equipment. Barriers to implementation: Both of these best practices will require upfront public education and awareness to the health and environmental effects these customs/habits have on growing numbers of the population. There is the potential of resistance from citizens /commercial properties for regulating a long -lived practice (fire- burning/ long car idling) by many homeowners. 140 of Edina Step Effectiveness — Education, awareness and eventual understanding of the negative impacts that air pollution has on individuals and a whole community will lead to a higher indoor and outdoor air quality, as well as the protection of the most respiratory- vulnerable citizens and children. In turn, health care costs associated with respiratory treatments will be reduced. Implementation Schedule: To be determined. Best Practice: #24 Benchmarks and Community Involvement (Required Step) Description: Adopt outcome measures for GreenStep and other city sustainability efforts, and engage community members in ongoing education, discussion, and campaigns. Current Practice: The City of Edina has benchmarked its carbon emission footprint. As a member of ICLEI, the City of Edina completed Milestone 1 for the year 2007: Inventory of carbon emissions generated by city operations, such as buildings, water pumps, city fleet, etc. Aggregate data were also collected for city-wide residential, commercial and industrial emissions. The Energy and Environment Commission has a very active'Education and Outreach group that organizes several community events throughout the year. Commission members regularly publish articles in the Edina Sun Current newspaper and in About Town, the official publication of the City of Edina. The results from the carbon emission inventory were used in a pilot project with the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) and published on their website in 2009 (www.cdproject.net). Best Practice as it applies to Edina: (Substeps #1 and #2 are required) Substep #1: (Required) The City of Edina reported the results of the carbon emission audit on its website, in an article in About Town, and in the pilot report with the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP). Substep #2: (Required) The Energy, & Environment Commission is working with City staff to purchase software support tools that will streamline data gathering, facilitate annual reporting to the community, and provide both financial and sustainability measurement tools for future city plans. Substep #4: (Optional) The City of Edina continuously engages members of the public through the various activities organized by the Education and Outreach Working Group of the Energy and Environment Commission. The Energy and Environment, Commission works with energy utilities to organize energy audits for residents. Working with a task force of EEC members, representatives from Xcel Energy, Centerpoint Energy and the Center for Energy and the Environment (MN Energy Challenge staff) we are focusing attention on two Edina neighborhoods for Summer and Fall of 2010 to promote the HES (Home Energy Squad) Program. The Morningside Neighborhood Association (NINA) will assist efforts to mobilize residents to attend HES educational meetings to enroll households in participating in the HES program in the Summer of. 2010. In the Fall of 2b10'we will begin working with the Highlands Neighborhood of Edina. Summer 2010 awareness was raised about the'HES program as well as connecting neighbors in the Highlands neighborhood through hosting the US Overall Flying disc Championships at their local park. Substep #5: (Optional) The City of Edina has held a Natural Step workshop for City Staff, the City Commissioners, City Council and residents at large on July 27, 2009 and August 6, 2009. Barriers to implementation: 1) Technology Infrastructure: the City must invest in technology tools if it wants to effectively monitor emission and implement carbon abatement strategies that are quantifiable and financially sound. 15 . V, ^6ity of Edina 2) The main barrier to the success of the HES program is to find enough volunteers to canvas the neighborhoods without an active neighborhood association. Step Effectiveness — Education: Encourage residents to take the MN Energy Challenge and to actively challenge neighborhoods to decrease their energy use and take advantage of the energy efficiency programs available to them. Implementation schedule: 1) Implementation of Technology Infrastructure — 1 year 2) Completion of ICLEI Milestone 2 and 3 — 1 to 2 years 3) Implementation of ICLEI Milestone 4: 2+ years 4) Education about the MN Energy Challenge and the Home Energy Squads 1 -2 years Best Practice: #25 Green Business Developmeni (Required Step) Description: Economic and Community Development Current Practice: The City has no current projects or programs in place. Best Practice as it applies to Edina: (At least 2 substeps must be completed) The Recycling and Solid Waste Working Group (RSW WG) recommended undertaking the following two sub steps: Substep #2: (Optional) Invite Assistance providers, Such as Minnesota Waste Wise/,Minnesota Energy Smart, the Minnesota Technical Assistance Program and utility assistance providers, to conduct personalized energy, environmental sustainability, and waste audits with at least 5 businesses. MPCA is offering assistance to 10 businesses under GreenStep #22 Solid Waste in the form of providing sample contracts (see http: / /www.pca. state .mn.us /oea/p2 /rmproizrams.cfm) for hauling to assist commercial businesses to modify existing contracts, or create new resource management contracts with waste haulers to manage recyclables, compostibles and hazardous materials. The RSW WG will work with local trade associations and give educational presentations on recycling as well as aiding them with an Easy Office Recycling program. Trade associations include the Edina Chamber of Commerce. The EnergySmart program sponsored by the Minnesota Chamber of Commerce will be used to get Edina businesses to focus on energy efficiency;' Substep #4: (Optional) Support the creation of a value -added business utilizing local waste- products such as wood from trees felled by storms, disease, insects and development. Complete St. Paul District Energy picks up and,chips the wood from the Edina brush dump at Braemar and hauls it to St. Paul District Energy's plant at a cost to Edina far less than hauling the brush to a brush dump in Hastings, as was previously done. The chips are used to fuel St. Paul's District Energy's plant. Barriers to implementation: Identifying 10 commercial businesses who would like to start a commercial recycling . program. Step Effectiveness — The step is adequate. Implementation schedule: One year. 16• of Edin6� Best Practice: #26 Renewable Energy (Optional Step) Description: Adding local renewable energy generation capacity. Current Practice: The city of Edina currently has no renewable energy capacity. Best Practice as it applies to Edina: (At least 2 substeps must be completed) The Alternative Energy Working Group (AE WG) recommended sub steps #5 and #6. Substep #5: (Optional) Install renewable capacity on at least one city-owned building,, street light, speed display or chargeable message sign. The city received a grant from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), which is the $4.5 million Federal stimulus funding for renewable energy for local governments. This grant will require a 40% match. The grant would be used to install a 20 KW photovoltaic solar system on.City Hall. A significant portion of the matching fund requirements would be satisfied by relying upon in -kind contributions of equipment and labor from the solar installer. The City will need to seek bids to install the system. Approximately $30,000 in additional matching funds from the City would be required. The City of Edina would be able to acquire a $150,000 .solar panel system for approximately $30,000 in matching funds from the City. Substep #6: (Optional) Work with private /public partners to create renewable' energy generation capacity with the following attributes: Fueled by wind— Utilize WindSource. GreenStep Pilot Effectiveness — BP #15 (Purchasing) Sub Step #2: "Purchase 15% renewable energy by 2015 consistent with the State's Next Generation Energy goal" is miscast under the BP for Purchasing and should be included under this Renewable Energy step instead. Under BP #15.2 the EEC makes the following recommendation. Invite Windsource to give their PowerPoint presentation to a work session of EEC /City Council so that a determination can be made as to what extent Windsource could be utilized to accomplish the 15 %renewable energy objective. Barriers to implementation: Solar Panel Project - Funding issue: At least $30,000 must be supplied via other resources. Windsource Project - There will be an additional cost on the city energy bill for Windsource. Occasionally Windsource is cheaper than coal/gas depending on energy prices. Currently coal /gas are very low because the recession has decreased demand. Natural Gas is cheap presently because it has become more abundant. Implementation schedule: Solar panels — Installation will require 6 months. Utilizing Windsource would depend on the outcome of discussions with Xcel Windsource officials and pricing. 17 • o11e REPORURECOMMEN®ATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV. D. From: Eric Roggeman Assistant Finance Director ® Action ❑ Discussion Information Date: January 18, 2011 Subject: Energy & Environment Commission — Solar PV System for City Hall INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Surya lyer of the City's Energy & Environment Commission will give a presentation to Council on the solar photovoltaic system for the roof at City Hall. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Memo from EEC recommending Council action. 2. Budget request that was submitted with the official application 3. Budget estimate indicating the City's share of the investment under 3 scenarios To: Edina City Council From: Edina Energy Commission Date: January 13, 2011 Subject: Recommendation to Edina City Council to Approve Moving Forward with the City's Application to the State of Minnesota for a Solar Photovoltaic System for the City Hall Building The Edina Energy Commission (EEC) has approved a motion at its January 13, 2011 meeting requesting the Edina City Council to authorize City staff and the EEC to proceed with its application to the State of Minnesota Department of Commerce (Commerce) for a renewable energy grant to install a solar photovoltaic system on the roof of the Edina City Hall building. Specifically, the EEC requests the City Council to approve and authorize the following actions: 1. Authorize City Staff to complete the final phase of the City's grant application on behalf of the City with Commerce for the installation of the solar PV system. This involves completing the information requested by Commerce, including an updated budget and waste management plan. 2. Authorize City Staff to hire an engineering firm to perform preliminary design work to be included in a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the solar PV project. EEC Rationale for Supporting This Project: 1. The City will make a long term capital investment at a cost savings of approximately $100,000. The solar PV renewable energy project has an expected 30 year life span. The City has qualified for a state grant that will cover 40% of the project cost. We estimate the grant will be between $54,000 and $70,000; the City will know the exact amount after it opens bids and recommends a bid award. In addition, the project will receive an Xcel Energy rebate of $44,226. In sum, the City will receive an estimated $98,000 to $114,000 to finance this system. 2. In addition to the immediate savings from the state grant and utility rebate, the City will save at least $2,250 per year in electricity costs based on its current rates for at least the 30 year expected life of the system. As electricity rates increase in the future, this savings also grows, since all electricity produced by the solar PV system is free. 3. The solar PV system will serve as a symbol of the City's commitment to reduce its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, consistent with the City's membership in ICLEI's Cities for Climate Protection and the U.S. Conference of Mayors Climate Protection Agreement. 4. This system will be an important demonstration project and public education tool. The amount of energy that the system produces will be displayed in real time over the internet. The EEC intends to involve the Edina School District in this project, so that students can learn about both the technology and the environmental benefits from solar energy. In addition, the EEC intends to work with City staff to create a display in the City Hall lobby that educates the public about the impact of the solar PV system on the roof as well as other clean energy initiatives by the city, such as the ground source heat system at the new public works building, the Home Energy Squad project, WindSource, and other efforts. The two attachments include: (1) the City's budget request that was submitted with our official application on August 4, 2010; and (2) A budget estimate indicating the City's share of the investment under 3 scenarios, which reflect the estimated low bid in response to an RFP issued by the City this spring. The City's investment ranges from a low of $36,774 to a high of $60,774. The City Council will decide whether to go ahead with the project after bids are received and its actual cost is known. The EEC urges the City Council to approve the actions identified above so that the City can take advantage of this unique opportunity to obtain a renewable energy system with significant financial assistance. Local Government Renewable Energy Grant Program Attachment 1 Applications must be submitted using this document. Fill out additional attachments as required. nt Intormation Entity Name: City of Edina Minnesota Primary Project Contact: Heather Worthington Title: Assistant City Manager Contact's Email: horthington@ci.edina.mn.us Phone number: 952.826.0415 Address: 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina Minnesota 55424 Applicant Type: Statutory City Applicant FEID #: Applicant DUNS Number: r.�r i,.... Applicant Match Funds: $167,204.00 Percent of Total: 81.57% r� ;� r `rfe� r Requested Grant Funds: $82,000.00 Percent of Total: 40.00/ Rebates: $44,226.00 Percent of Total: 100.00% Cost: 204 978.00 Total Project $ Project start date: 10/15/10 Annual Cost Savings $2,250.00 Project end date: 09/15/11,.;r�,+; Aggregate Payback: 91.10 Total Labor Hours: 394 o.....,.... M- c..n —, T—i,nnl— cl— Tntal rnct Installation Location p �k`��• J #.. -vim� ..r. a • /j�TylYif .:li' yi1•r', rz %? /� %r^ `- kW -h 25,000 kW -h $204,978 Edina City Hall roof Tons Sq. Ft. BTU /Hr n#irial rprtifiratinn Certifying Official's Name (print): Heather Worthingon Certifying Official's Title: Assistant City Manager >' L Certifying Official's Signature: % Date: Aug. 4, 2010 Minnesota Office of Energy Security PROJECT BUDGET Solar Photovoltaic System for City Hall, 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina, MN Solyndra Panels and Sunnyboy Inverters Permits and Engineering 4,500 Solyndra Modules and Sunny Boy Inverters 140,678 Paint Roof White or Rerock 10,000 Crane Service to Lift Equipment to Roof 3,000 Labor at Davis Bacon Prevailing Wages 34,000 Module and Rack Installation Inverter Installation Meter Work Panel Work Service Panel 2000 Balance of System 9,000 Conduit, wire, misc. parts and supplies 1800 Total Budget 204,978 Three Scenarios To Illustrate Range of City Share of Solar PV System Assumptions: REBATE: 25,000 kwh system = $44,226 Xcel SolarRewards Rebate (Rebate is tied to size of system, not dependent on contractor's bid CITY EXPENSES: Any expenses the city incurs after the contract is entered with the state will count as part of the match it needs, such as labor for city to monitor, inspect, issue permits, prepare reports, process payments, etc. This will be in -kind city staff time. (Note: All expenses to prepare and issue the RFP will not qualify for cost - share). GRANT: State grant is 40% of the contractor bid CONTRACTOR BID: Three estimated bids to represent low, middle, and high end: $135,000, $150,000 and $175,000. Next Steps: Asking City Council for approval to request bids for project, with a City cost share likely to be in this range. City can reject all bids but would incur bid prep expenses (including some design). Under all scenarios, this is about a 4:1 return (City gets a system worth 4 times more than its cost) and there is an annual electricity savings of over $2,000 (at current rates) with a 30 year expected life, so it seems reasonable to ask approval to proceed. Low Estimate Bid: $135,000 Rebate: $44,226 40% Grant: $54,000 City Cost $36,774 Middle Estimate $150,000 $44,226 $60,000 $45,774 High Estimate $175,000 $44,226 $70,000 $60,774 Annual electricity cost savings: $2,250/yr (From proposal attachment 1) City electricity cost rate: 6 cents to 8 cents per kw (Confirm ?) Expected electricity production from 25 MW system: xxxx kw /yr o Fe t4 Cn all REPORURECOMMEN ®ATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item IV. E. From: Susan Howl ® Action Human Services Coordinator Staff Liaison to HRRC Discussion Information Date: January 18, 2011 Subject: RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -21 REQUESTING AN AMENDMENT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES ALLOWING HEALTH COVERAGE TO BE EXTENDED TO DOMESTIC PARTNERS AT THE DISCRETION OF LOCAL JURISDICTIONS ACTION REQUESTED: Approval of Resolution No. 2011 -21 INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Minnesota Statute 471.61 allows local units of government to offer group insurance to their employees, defining a "dependent' to only include a spouse and minor unmarried child for insurance purposes. During the 2008 session, the Legislature passed a bill which amended the definition of "dependent' in this Statute to include "and others as defined by local governmental units at their discretion." This bill made the third reading in the Senate but was ultimately vetoed by the Governor. The Edina Human Rights and Relations Commission prepared Resolution No. 2011 -21 stating that the Edina City Council urges the State to keep the bill alive and get it passed. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 2011 -21 2. S.F. No. 960 from 2008 Legislative Session with status information a 4„ RESOLUTION NO. 2011-21 REQUESTING AN AMENDMENT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES ALLOWING HEALTH COVERAGE TO BE EXTENDED TO DOMESTIC PARTNERS AT THE DISCRETION OF LOCAL JURISDICTIONS WHEREAS, it is the public policy of the City of Edina to secure for all residents of the City freedom from discrimination because of race, color, creed, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, disability, status with regard to public assistance, familial status, or national origin in connection with employment, housing and real property, public accommodations, public services, credit and education; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 471.61 restricts the ability of the City to offer equal group insurance benefits to City of Edina employees in domestic partnerships as it offers to married City of Edina employees. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council urges the Minnesota Legislature and Governor to amend M.S. 471.61, Subdivision la as follows: Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2010, section 471.61, subdivision la is amended to read: Subd. la. Dependents. Notwithstanding the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 1969, section 471.61, as amended by Laws 1971, chapter 451, section 1, the word "dependents" as used therein shall mean spouse and minor unmarried children under the age of 18 years and dependent students under the age of 25 years actually dependent upon the employee, and others as defined by governmental units at their discretion. Dated: January 18, 2011 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 18, 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and sea] of said City this day of 12011. City Clerk • S.F. No. 960, 1st Engrossment - 2007 - 2008th Legislative Session (2007 -2008) 1.1 A bill for an act 1.2 relating to local government; modifying the definition of "dependent" for 1.3 purposes of group benefits for local government officers and employees; 1.4 amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 471.6 1, subdivision la. 1.5 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: 1.6 Section 1. Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 471.6 1, subdivision 1 a, is amended to read: 1.7 Subd. la. Dependents. Notwithstanding the provisions of Minnesota Statutes 1969, 1.9 section 471.61, as amended by Laws 1971, chapter 451, section 1, the word "dependents" 1.9 as used therein shall mean spouse and miner unmarried children under the age of H years t.to and dependent students under the age o 25 years aettially dependent upon the employe 1.11 and others as defined by governmental units at their discretion. 1.12 Sec. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. 1.13 Section I is effective the day following final enactment. Sec. 2. 0 SF0960 Status in House for Legislative Session 85 Page 1 of 2 t Legislature Home I Links to the World I Help I Advanced Search �inl�eso�a �St�teC:egisl�t�re House I Senate I Joint Departments and Commissions I Bill Search and Status I Statutes, Laws, and Rules None SF0960(House) _ ' SF0960(Senate) ..: ............................ SF0960 Status in House for Legislative Session 85 Bill Name: SF0960 Companion: HF1097 Revisor Number: 07 -1382 Bill Text Companion Text Session Law Chapter: 342 Companion Status Senate Search House Davnie ; Hilty ; Liebling ; Tschumper ; Peterson. N. ; Erhardt; Hilstrom ; Kahn ; DIII ; Authors Solberg ; Simon ; Clark; Bigham ; Murphy, E. ; Hornstein ; Walker; Paymar ; Hausman; Carlson ; Nelson ; Atkins ; Jaros ; Wagenius ; Loeffler; Winkler ; Lenczewski Senate Higgins; Dibble ; Koerina Saxhaug ; Sieben Authors Short Dependent definition modified relating to group benefits for local government officers and employees. Description Long Further Committee Actions House Research Summary Description HOUSE Actions SENATE Actions Top Date 1 Action Description I Committee Text ® o Call 04/07/2008 04/07/2008 11 Received from Senate Senate file first reading, referred for H 109 a 9782 9783 04/10/2008 04/10/2008 comparison Bills identical, SF substituted on General Register Second reading 9860 10019 05/15/2008 05/15/2008 House rule 1.21, placed on Calendar for the Day Third reading 12213 12216 05/15/2008 Bill was passed 12216 83 -50 Presented to Governor May 15, 2008 Governor veto May 18, 2008 Secretary of State, Filed May 18, 2008 Chapter number 342 https: / /www.revisor.mn.gov /revisor /pages /search status /status detail.php ?b= House &f= SF0960 &ssn =0... 11/24/2009 SF0960 Status in House for Legislative Session 85 Page 2 of 2 SENATE Actions HOUSE Actions Tom Dat 02/19/2007 02/19/2007 03114/2007 Action Introduction and first reading Referred to Committee report: To Description I Committee Text Intro Paae 399 873 RoI1 Call State and Local Government Operations' and Oversight pass 03/14/2007 Second reading 902 0 Rule 47, returned to l State and Local GovernmentOperatiions and Oversight 6408 03/13/2008 Committee report: To pass :; as amended 7528a 03/13/2008 ISecond reading 7528 04/01%2008 04/03/2008 05/15/2008 General Orders: To pass Calendar: Third reading Passed Returned from House ` 8235 8438 10309 43 -22 Presentment date 05/15/08 Governor's action Veto 05/18/08 1 Q863 Secretary of State Ch, 342 05/18/08 05118/2008. Veto message laid on table 10663 See also SF1997, Art. 2, Sec. 72 (vetoed) Please direct all comments concerning issues or legislation to your House Member or State Senator. For Legislative Staff or for directions to the Capitol, visit the Contact Us page. General questions or comments. last updated: 10120/2009 httnc, / /wwxw rPvicnr mn 11/9.4/9.009 .P 1 8438 JOURNAL OF THE SENATE [99TH DAY So the bill passed and its title was agreed to. S.F. No. 960: A bill for an act relating to local government; modifying the definition of "dependent" for purposes of group benefits for local government officers and employees; amending Minnesota Statutes 2006, section 471.61, subdivision la. Was read the third time and placed on its final passage. The question was taken on the passage of the bill. Bakk The roll was called, and there were yeas 43 and nays 22, as follows: Those who voted in the affirmative were: Fischbach -.. Anderson Dahle Larson Olson, M. Bakk Dibble Latz Pappas Berglin Doll Lourey Pogemiller Betzold Erickson Ropes Lynch Prettner Solon Bonoff Foley Marty Rest Carlson Higgrns Metzen Rummel Chaudhary Koenng Moua Saltzman Clark Kubly Murphy Saxhaug Cohen Langseth Olseen Scheid Those who voted in the negative were: Koering Day Gimse Koch Robling Dille Hann Limmer Rosen Fischbach Ingebrigtsen Michel Frederickson Senjem Johnson Olson, G. Gerlach Jungbauer Sppaarks Pariseau Vandeveer So the bill passed and its title was agreed to. Senjem Sheran Sieben Skoe Stumpf Tomassoni Torres Ray Wiger Vickerman Wergin S.F. No. 3417: A bill for an act relating to occupations and professions; adding an exception to the complementary and alternative health care client bill of rights for inpatient hospital setting and hospice care; amending Minnesota Statutes 2007 Supplement, section 146A.11, subdivision 1. Was read the third time and placed on its final passage. The question was taken on the passage of the bill. The roll was called, and there were yeas 64 and nays 0, as follows: Those who voted in the affirmative were: Anderson Doll Bakk Erickson Ropes Berglin Fischbach -.. Betzold Foley Bonoff . Frederickson Carlson Gerlach Chaudhary Gimse Clark Hann Cohen Higgins Dahle Johnson Day Jungbauer Dibble Koch Dille Koering Kubly Olson, G. Sheran Langseth Olson, M. Sieben _- Larson --------- °- ---- pappa� - - -- ---- -- --- �koe- ......... . Latz Pogemiller Skogen Limmer Prettner Solon Sparks Lourey Rest Stumpf Lynch Robling Tomassom Marty Rosen Torres Ray Metzen Rummel Vandeveer Michel Saltzman Vickerman Moua Saxhaug Wer& Murphy Scheid Wiger Olseen Senjem So the bill passed and its title was agreed to. Roll Call on S.F. NO. 960 CALENDAR FOR THE DAY Passage - Minnesota House of Representatives Page 1 of 1 * Unofficial Recorded Roll Call Floor Vote 0.960 Anderson, S. Beard Brod Buesgens NDAR FOR THE DAY Dean DeLaForest Demmer Passage Doty Drazkowski Eastlund Emmer 83 YEA and 50 Nay Finstad Garofalo Gottwalt Gunther Date: 5/15/2008 Hamilton Heidgerken Holberg Hoppe Journal Page 12216 * Please see the Journal of the House for official recorded roll call votes. Those who voted In the affirmative were: McNamara Nornes Anzelc Atkins Benson Berns Bigham Bly Brown Brynaert Bunn Carlson Clark Davnie Dill Dittrich Dominguez Eken Erhardt Faust Fritz Gardner Greiling Hansen Hausman Haws Hilstrom Hilly Hornstein Hortman Hosch Huntley Jaros Johnson Juhnke Kahn Kalin Kelliher Knuth Kranz Laine Lenczewski Lesch Liebling Lleder Lillie Loeffler Madore Mahoney Mariani Marquart Masin Moe Morgan Morrow Mullery Murphy, E. Murphy, M. Nelson Norton Paymar Pelowski Peterson, A. Peterson, N. Peterson, S. Poppe Rukavina Ruud Sailer Scalze Sertich Simon Slawik Slocum Solberg Swails Thao in Tillberry Tschumper Wagenius Walker Winkler Wollschlager Those who voted in the negative were: Abeler Anderson, S. Beard Brod Buesgens Cornish Dean DeLaForest Demmer Dettmer Doty Drazkowski Eastlund Emmer Erickson Finstad Garofalo Gottwalt Gunther Hackbarth Hamilton Heidgerken Holberg Hoppe Howes Koenen Kohls Lanning Magnus McFarlane McNamara Nornes Olin Olson Otremba Ozment Paulsen Peppin Ruth Seifert Severson Shimanski Simpson Smith Tingelstad Urdahl Ward Wardlow Westrom Zellers h": / /www.house.leR.state.mn.us /votes /votes.asi)?Is year =85 &session number= 0 &vear= 2007 &id =1473 11/24/2009 o�l�e \�.:e ' ' REPORT /RECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: IV. F. From: Wayne Houle, PE u— ® Action Public Works Director/ ❑ Discussion City Engineer Information Date: January 18, 2011 Subject: Resolution No. 2011 -17 Receiving Feasibility Reports for Improvement Projects: 1. BA -371 Killarney Shores Street Reconstruction 2. BA -372 McCauley Heights Street Reconstruction 3. BA -373 Oscar Roberts Street Reconstruction 4. BA -383 West 441h Street Reconstruction ACTION REQUESTED: Approve attached Resolution No. 2011 -17, receiving the feasibility studies for Killarney Shores Street Reconstruction, Improvement: No. BA -371; McCauley Heights Street Reconstruction, Improvement: No. BA -372; Oscar Roberts Street Reconstruction, Improvement: BA -373; and West 44th Street Reconstruction, Improvement No. BA -383. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The City Council has set these public hearings for February 1, 2011. Attached is the feasibility studies; please bring these feasibility studies to the February 1St City Council meeting. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2011 -17 Feasibility Reports: 1. BA -371 Killarney Shores Street Reconstruction 2. BA -372 McCauley Heights Street Reconstruction 3. BA -373 Oscar Roberts Street Reconstruction 4. BA -383 West 44th Street Reconstruction G: \Engineering \Improvements \BA371 Killarney Shores Street Recon (2011) \PRELIM DESIGN \FEASIBILITY \Public Hearing \Item IV F Resolution No. 2011 -17 Receiving Feasibility Reports for BA -371, BA -372, BA- 383.docx t,->Ly (x Ecillid WHEREAS, at the request of Edina City Engineer, reports have been prepared by staff with reference to the proposed Improvement Nos. BA -371, BA -372, BA -372, and BA- 383 the improvement of Killarney Shores, McCauley Heights, Oscar Roberts, and West 44th Street, and these reports are hereby received by the Council on January 18, 2011; and WHEREAS, the reports provide information regarding whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost - effective, and feasible; whether they should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement; the estimated cost of the improvements as recommended; and a description of the methodology used to calculate individual assessments for affected parcels; NOW; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA: 1. The council will consider the improvement of such streets in accordance with said reports and the possible assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvements pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429 at an estimated total cost of the improvement of $750,000 (BA -371), $183,400 (BA -372), $421,200 (BA -373), and $230,000 (BA -383). A public hearing shall be held on such proposed improvement on the 1st day of February, 2011, in the council chambers of the city hall at 7:00 p.m. and the clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. ADOPTED this 18th day of January, 2011. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland,-Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 18, 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952- 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 4,91A,1 ok e FEASIBILITY STUDY — BA 371 o ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT °•,ti�nMo:� CITY OF EDINA KILLARNEY SHORES NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS JANUARY 18, 2011 LOCATION: The Project includes Killarney Lane, View Lane and Schaeffer Road. The drawing below is a detailed project location map of Killarney Shores Neighborhood Roadway Improvements (Figure 1). 5721 - �- 6113 ��.•� ' 6132 5726 5725 5600 6217 6213 �� •.••�•• 6137 6128 f•• 612 5801 • 6133 r ~ 6125 5605 •✓" i 6129 6111 5610 58 J�' ; 09- 5806 11 PROJECT LIMITS 6105 6140 6401 6138 6136 .s 1 6139 6134 i 125 6127 i 6132 6130 •• 6126 6128 : .......................�? J. ........... Project Area W " E e Killarney Shores Street Reconstruction S or o Improvement No: BA -371 E°°' ^` December 7010 Figure 1. Protect Area Map 04 03 oaua 6306 oaP�S 5 5905 5906 6 10 503 1 op 5912 6d00 5904 5909 12 5916 900 5905 5908 5013 I 5902 5909 5917 5920 ' 5912 5904 5913 5921 5924 5916 $ > 5908 � > 3 5925 5926 • -- - 5920 ?�? 6000 5917 , 6000 i T 3 6001 X00 6001 6004 12 6004 6005 6004 6005 6412 6013 6006 6009 6009 6006 i 6006 16 = 6012 6012 _ _ 6013 6012 6015 ; 6417 6404 = 6017 6016 6017 6016 = 6413 6400 : 6020 = '021 6020 6021 ; 6105 6140 6401 6138 6136 .s 1 6139 6134 i 125 6127 i 6132 6130 •• 6126 6128 : .......................�? J. ........... Project Area W " E e Killarney Shores Street Reconstruction S or o Improvement No: BA -371 E°°' ^` December 7010 Figure 1. Protect Area Map Feasibility Study Killarney Shores Neighborhood Improvements No. BA -371 January 18, 2011 INITIATION & ISSUES: The Killarney Shores Neighborhood project was initiated by the Engineering Department as part of the City's street reconstruction program. This project is identified in the Capital Improvement Program. This project addresses updating aging infrastructure including issues such as drainage problems, . sanitary sewer problems and watermain improvements. Comprehensive Plan All Engineering projects are reviewed for compatibility with the City of Edina 2008 comprehensive Plan Update. Figure 7. 10, Sidewalk Facilities and 7.11, Bicycle Facilities in the Appendix do not indicate any proposed sidewalk, paths or bicycle facilities within the project limits. Staff Issues The following are existing features and resident comments that .present issues in determining the feasibility of the project and are addressed in this report: ® Surface rainwater drainage and storm sewer issues Backyard drainage o Poor condition of. existing pavement ® Existing landscaping, retaining walls, driveways, etc. Sanitary sewer and watermain deficiencies m Existing mature trees Existing lighting Resident Input The residents of the reconstruction area were invited to an Open House on September 20, 2010 to discuss the City's process for street reconstruction. This meeting was followed up with a questionnaire sent to the property owners on October 4, 2010. The questionnaires were completed and returned by 42 of the 68 property owners, a return rate of 62 %. The full questionnaire and responses can be found in the Appendix. The two key issues that were addressed in this questionnaire were the addition of new sidewalks and installation of decorative lighting. The responses to those questions are shown in Table 1. Page 2 of 8 Feasibility Study 4_ r Killarney Shores Neighborhood Improvements No. BA -371 January 18, 2011 KILLARNEY SHORES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT — Results from October 4, 2010 Questionnaire Sheet Questionnaires Questionnaires Prefer New Sidewalk Change Existing Sent Returned Li htin Yes No Yes No 68 42 1 40 4 36 % of Returned 62% 2% * 95% * 10% * 86 ° /o Questionnaires * Percentages are based on responses of returned questionnaires and may not equal 100% if questions were not answered on questionnaire Table 1. Results from Questionnaire A neighborhood informational meeting was then held on December 13, 2010 to discuss the improvements planned for this neighborhood. The meeting was attended by 20 residents representing approximately 10 properties. EXISTING CONDITIONS: Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer The sanitary sewer was installed in 1968. There have been very few sewer blockages in this neighborhood. The trunk sanitary sewer mains will be inspected using a televising system and areas with deficiencies will be rehabilitated. Watermain The watermain was installed in 1968. There have been very few reports of trunk watermain and service pipe issues in this neighborhood. Storm Sewer The limited storm sewer in this neighborhood was installed in 1968 and 1993. The project area is located within the legal boundary of .,Nine Mile Creek Watershed. Private Utilities Providers of privately owned gas, electric, communications and cable television utilities are present in the neighborhood. All the utilities are overhead with the exception of the gas lines. Street lighting consists of standard "traditional head" lights mounted on square wood poles that are scattered throughout the neighborhood. A few homeowners have front yard lights that help illuminate the street corridors. Streets The majority of the roadways in this neighborhood were originally constructed in 1969. The neighborhood currently has curb and gutter and the widths are approximately 31 feet wide. The pavement condition varies throughout the neighborhood and is in relatively poor condition (Photos 1 & 2). Page 3 of 8 Feasibility Study Killarney Shores Neighborhood Improvements No. BA -371 January 18, 2011 The average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) for the City of Edina is 57 and the average PCI for Killarney Shores is 27. Examples of the raveling and alligator cracking can be seen in photos 1 & 2. The City of Edina, with the help of a pavement consultant, reviews a third of the city's roadway every year. The streets are graded based on a number of conditions such as sagging, alligator cracking, raveling and potholes. Streets are rated on a scale from 0 to 100; with 0 being extremely poor and 100 representing a brand new road surface. It is the City's practice to complete a total reconstruction of the streets when the PCI is less than 45, a Mill and Overlay project when the PCI is between 45 and 65, and Seal Coats for PCI greater than 65 and less than 95. The pavement throughout these streets appears to be near the end of its useful life while the costs to maintain and repair the roadways are steadily increasing. Overlaying or seal coating the pavement is no longer feasible. Landscaping Some property owners have placed boulders or other obstructions within the City right -of -way creating barriers along the roadway. These types of barriers and landscaping items are prohibited from being placed in the boulevard in accordance with Edina City Code 1200.02. Other typical items exist adjacent to the roadway such as retaining walls, concrete driveways, landscaping, shrubs, trees and fences. Photo 1. Existing Pavement Condition Page 4 of 8 Feasibility Study Killarney Shores Neighborhood Improvements No. BA -371 January 18, 2011 Photo 2. Existing Pavement Condition aaW016 IMPROVEMENTS: The Killarney Shores Neighborhood project involves localized rehabilitation of sanitary sewer, upgrades to the storm sewer system including sump drain, upgrades to fire hydrants, spot repair on existing concrete curb and gutter, and reconstruction of bituminous pavement. Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer The sanitary sewer will be televised in the next couple of weeks and segments with settlements, cracks and deformities will be rehabilitated. Watermain Watermain rehabilitation is proposed include upgrading all hydrants. Stnrm SPwPr on segments within the project limits Spot repairs will be made to the existing concrete curb and gutter that are no longer functioning properly The storm sewer network will have modifications to improve existing drainage issues at various locations throughout the neighborhood. Some of the existing structures will be removed and replaced due to their poor condition. Page 5 of 8 Feasibility Study Killarney Shores Neighborhood Improvements No. BA -371 January 18, 2011 Installation of sump drains will be installed where feasible to allow the property owners to connect their sump pump discharges directly into the storm sewer system. Private Utilities Comcast, the local cable television, has indicated that they may upgrade or replace underground mains within the project limits. This work is not part of the City's project but will be coordinated to occur prior to our construction activities. CenterPoint Energy, local utility gas company, has minimal work and majority of work should be done in the boulevard. The other privately utility owners have expressed some interest in upgrading some of their networks within the project limits. Staff will continue to communicate with these private utility companies for any anticipated improvements. Streets The project will reconstruct the streets with a bituminous surface to the same width as today while maintaining the existing concrete curb and gutter. The proposed design acknowledges and addresses as many comments and concerns by residents of the neighborhood as possible while still maintaining the desired minimum standards of the engineering and public works staff. Residential Roadway Liahtina and Sidewalks The questionnaire asked if residents wanted to add sidewalk or reconstruct the street lights in the project area. The results from Table 1 show that property owners do not want to add sidewalk or reconstruct the street lights within the project. Therefore, staff is not recommending these items be part of the project. RIGHT -OF -WAY & EASEMENTS: The right -of -way for this neighborhood is 60 feet wide. All proposed improvements stay within this right -of -way and no additional easement requirements are anticipated. PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $1,013,000 (Table 2). The total cost includes direct costs for engineering, clerical and construction finance costs from start of project to final assessment hearing. Funding for the entire project will be from a combination of special assessment and utility funds. The estimated roadway construction cost is $750,000 and will be 100 percent funded by special assessments. The • City, Bredesen Park, will also participate in the special assessment cost which includes approximately $107,143. The new concrete curb and gutter is included under the storm sewer fund not under the roadway special assessment. Utility improvements and repairs amount to $263,000 and will be funded through the respective utility fund. Page 6 of 8 Feasibility Study Killarney Shores Neighborhood Improvements No. BA -371 January 18, 2011 Item Amount Total Cost Roadway: $750,000 Roadway Total: $ 750,000 Utilities: Storm Sewer $ 188,000 Watermain $ 42,000 Sanitary Sewer $ 33,000 Utility Total: $ 263,000 Total Project: $ 1,013,000 Table 2. Estimated Project Costs ASSESSMENTS, The assessments are based on the City's Special assessment policy, dated September 7, 2010. Based on this policy there are 77 residential equivalent units (REU). The estimated assessment per REU is $9,733.45. (Figure 2) 5800 6217 6209 �•• E 6137 Preliminary Assessments 6213 f - 0.8 REU 5809 •✓• 6133 - 1.0 REU 5 1.6 REV 810 ! 6129 _ -7 City Property 5809- 11 1 PROJI ECT L1MRs 6300. 5901- 1 04 6306- 5 10 5912 6400 13 : 5916 = 5920 i 5924 °z I 3 5928 ei 5 3 5 - l �S •,3 6 V 1 6000 _ 6004 _ 6008 .. 6008 , � 6401 6138 6136 6134 27 6132 fjlF , 6130 l 6126 ................... e Preliminary Assessments W -N Killarney Shores Street Reconstruction 5 �o Improvement No: BA -371 Figure 2. Preliminary Assessment Map Page 7 of 8 Feasibility Study Killarney Shores Neighborhood Improvements No. BA -371 January 18, 2011 PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible.from an Engineering standpoint: Project Open House September 20, 2010 Neighborhood Informational Meeting December 13, 2010 Council Orders Public Hearing January 4, 2011 Receive Feasibility Report January 18, 2011 Public Hearing February 1, 2011 Bid Opening April 2011 Award Contract Spring 2011 Begin Construction Spring 2011 Complete Construction Fall 2011 Final Assessment Hearing Fall 2012 FEASIBILITY: Staff believes the construction of this project is necessary, cost effective and feasible to improve the public infrastructure in the Killarney Shores Neighborhood. APPENDIX: A. Open House Meeting Letter and Presentation B. Property Owners Questionnaire C. Questionnaire Results D. Informational Meeting Letter E. - Information Meeting PowerPoint Presentation and Attendance List F. Recommendation to Set Public Hearing, Notice of Public Hearing to residents, and Notice of Public Hearing Advertisement G. Preliminary Assessment Roll H. City Comprehensive Plan Update — Sidewalk and Bicycle Facilities (Fig. 7.10 and 7.11) Page 8 of 8 APPENDIX A 1 of 5 September 7, 2010 RE: 2011 Street Reconstruction Projects Dear Resident: Last fall you were notified that the City of Edina initiated the process of roadway and utility improvements for your neighborhood for the summer of 2011. At the same time you were also invited to an open house to learn more about the process. Once again, you are invited to attend a similar informational meeting on Monday, September 20, 7:00 p.m., at the new Public Works and Park Maintenance Facility, located at 7450 Metro Boulevard, see attached map on back. The meeting will consist of a short presentation starting at 7:15 p.m. with question and answer to follow. The presentation will cover topics such as "How are streets selected for reconstruction; Who funds the project; Special Assessment; What can I expect during construction; How can I stay informed." The exact amount that you will be assessed for this project will not be available in time for the open house; however, based on past projects, you can expect the amount to be between $8,000 to $12,000. To prepare for the meeting, please review the enclosed brochure "A Guide to Edina's Street Reconstruction Process ". Also for additional information on our Reconstruction Process please go to our website at http:// www. CityOfEdina.com /FutureProjects. Please contact Assistant City Engineer, Jack Sullivan if you have any questions or if you are unable to attend and would like more information on the process. Jack can be reached at lullivan .ci.edina.mn.us or 952 - 826 -0445. Sincerely, Wayne D. Houle, P.E. Director of Public Works and City Engineer G:\Engineering\lnfrastructurc \Streets \pavement management\Neighborhood Reconstruction Program \2011 and 2012 Street Recon\2011 Open House Letter.doc APPENDIX A 2of5 City of Edina "�'`� New Public Works Building sre�f �� 7450 Metro Blvd " W +[ Edina, MN 55439 s W 70Tj� W 70TH ST i ST o o J m Z J � � m LU W 74TH ST O New Public Works Building W 76TH ST i I EDINA INDUSTRIAL W 77TH ST BLVD �------- - - - - -- --- City of Edina "�'`� New Public Works Building sre�f �� 7450 Metro Blvd " W +[ Edina, MN 55439 s for Neighborhood Roadway Improvements 2011 and 2012 TYPICAL TIMELINE FROM FIRST NOTIFICATION TO END OF CONSTRUCTION August Kick -off informational letter to residents Mid - September Open House (for preceding two years) Mid - October / November Neighborhood informational meeting — m.tiaW detailed project plans and estimated cost are provided December / January Feasibility report and public hearing January / February I March Plan Preparation / Bidding April / May Construction starts October / November Construction finishes Spring Warranty work Summer / Fall Final Assessment Hearing 3 FUNDING Special Assessment pays 100% of the following (approximately $8,000 to $12,000 per Residential Equivalent Unit (REU): • Roadway — replacing entire roadbed • Sidewalks • Decorative Streetlights (optional) • Traffic Management (optional) 5 APPENDIX A 3of5 AGENDA Introductions Road Reconstruction Video Presentation 1. Process 2. Funding sources 3. Assessments 4. Communication with residents 5. What to expect during construction 6. What can I do to prepare for the project? Questions ` 40 PROCESS FROM START TO END 1m m1Nn IwME EiOUde'n ENO START l�e0iia- hwd }pi�n m.tiaW sort cmyu�• PLn• MncA Ad.mi� fm biA• Public NrvinF Rgdwti ifial COUntil rejects �� �t —__ fwrc�l mkn a Rl =� fwnA � n project. Proj -190es 101he E011om a115 -Y1t year xhedule � a (` FUNDING The Utility Fund which covers sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water main pays 100% of the following: • Curb & Gutter • Sanitary Sewer — trunk pipe only in the roadway Storm Sewer — trunk pipe in roadway and in easement on private property • Water main — trunk pipe in roadway up to the curb stop of private property Sump Pump Pipe — for residents to connect sump pumps 6 WHAT DO YOUR TAXES PAY FOR? The Portion of Your Property Tax that the City Receives .iry of Edina 20% City of Edina 80% Other Allocation Police Fire Parks Public Works Snowplowing Pothole Repairs Seal coating Other Street Maintenance COMMUNICATING WITH YOU informational Our bona c with you when we Worm you f the meeting, followed d by public hearings notification; open house; surveys; proiecl plans and schedules; and construction communication update letters via regular mail. Our last cation to you Is the notice off al special assessment hearing. public hearings will be published in the Edina Son - Curren Questionnaires will be sent during the early planning stage to help stall formulate a decision in areas such as street lighling and style of street lighting. ® Weakly construction updates will be sent via the "City Extra" email. Slay In the loop by signing up for this Ire at se Ice. Letters may be delivered to Inform you of time- senaifive events i�•j} such as wale, shut -oil the next morning. 9 RESIDENT QUESTIONNAIRE The property owners questionnaire generally gathers information on the following topics: Sump Pump Discharge Service Line — do you have one and the location? Residential Roadway Lighting — do you want decorative street lights, style and pole location? Pedestrian Issues — what are the issues and do you favor sidewalk? Private Underground Utilities — do you have underground lawn irrigation and pet containment? Local Drainage Problems — have you noticed drainage issues in the neighborhood? " APPENDIX A 4of5 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS — PAYMENT 0 OPTIONS spec'.' assessment pay more (he.no' ring Is held the fll ler by Nav 30 e project is completed etimes one year later). Oda payment It am 65 $8,0001. $12,000 Parable YM am 10 year. i Final assessment amounts are determined .'that time, but cannot exceed 10 % of pending assessmenl. a HOW CAN YOU GIVE INPUT AND STAY INFORMED? • www.CityolEdina.com Visit our website regularly. Information from open houses and other communications are archived on our website. • edinamailOci.edina.com Drop us an email • 952- 826 -0371 Call us; office hours are 7:00 -3:30 p.m. • Stop by the office Public Works and Engineering Departments 7950 Metro Boulevard • Schedule an appointment 952 -826 -0371 BOULEVARD AREAS Property owner items located within the City's right of way may be damaged during construction: • Irrigation and pet containment systems will only be restored if indicated on the resident questionnaire. • Prior to construction, residents will be given an opportunity to remove plantings and other landscape features in the boulevard. • Boulevards will be restored with grass - regardless of previous planting or WHAT CAN YOU EXPECT DURING CONSTRUCTION? • That the City will keep you informed of activities • Private utility companies updating their systems prior to City's contractor • Dusty, noisy, muddy (watering trucks will help to keep dust down) • May be asked to limit water use • May be connected to temporary water is WHAT CAN YOU DO TO PREPARE FOR THE PROJECT? • Begin financial planning for the assessment • Coordinate landscaping, driveway replacement and house remodeling projects with the reconstruction schedule • Complete questionnaire to provide feedback • Ask questions; inform staff of your concerns • Sign -up for "City Extra" to receive updates via email notification .5 APPENDIX A 5of5 WHAT CAN YOU EXPECT DURING CONSTRUCTION? • Irrigation system and pet containment may be damaged • May not be able to access your driveway for up to seven days • May not be able to access the roadway for a few hours • Contractor will accommodate special needs w91�,1� o e V1 0 H�o �y APPENDIX B 1 of 7 October 4, 2010 City of Edina RE: 2011 Killarney Shores Street Reconstruction — Resident Questionnaire Dear Resident: The City of Edina has initiated the process of roadway and utility improvements for the summer of 2011 for your neighborhood. The first step was to hold an open house on September 20, 2010, for you to become familiar with the process. Things to know and consider: O Residents pay a portion of the overall project cost in the form of a special assessment. A Typical special assessment ranges from $8,000 to $12,000 per Residential Equivalent Unit (REU) or, per property, and are payable over 10 years. The estimated special assessment for your neighborhood will not be determined until after information has been gathered from the questionnaires and a feasibility report is completed. You will not be billed for the special assessment until fall 2012. Components of a project vary and are based on questionnaire responses. The special assessment typically includes cost of new roadway, sidewalk and streetlights. Other utility upgrades such as water main, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and concrete curb and gutter are funded through the utility fund and are not special assessed. Construction typically starts in spring /early summer and end in late fall of the same year. The next step is to get feedback from you regarding a number of key components of the project. The information you share with us is essential in determining certain aspects of the project that may be constructed. This information will be discussed at the project information meeting (date yet to be determined). The following information explains the questionnaire that is enclosed. A map showing the boundaries of the area to be reconstructed is attached to the back of this letter._After reading this letter completely, please complete the questionnaire and return by October 18, 2010, in the self - addressed stamped envelope. 1. Drainage Service Connection Do you use a sump pump or have you considered installing one? Do you currently have a footing drain? The project could include a sump drain system along the roadway to collect groundwater, storm water runoff, and discharges from private sump pumps, roof drains or any other runoff from private property. City Mall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 APPENDIX B 2of7 2011 Killarney Shores Street Reconstruction — Resident Questionnaire Page 2 of 3 A typical sump pump discharges onto a homeowner's lawn. This can cause problems with your lawn, your neighbor's lawn, your basement if your lawn drains back to your home or with the street if the sump pump constantly runs down the gutter line promoting algae growth. Discharging the sump pump into the sanitary sewer system such as floor drains or laundry tubs is against the law, both City Ordinance and State Statute. If the topography and final street designs favor a City sump drain system we will need to know if you currently have a sump pump or a footing drain. The line from the home to the City sump drain system would be your responsibility including any plumbing modifications needed to connect your sump pump. The City sump drain system is funded through the storm sewer utility fund. We also would like to know about any local drainage problems. This might be an opportunity for the sump drain system to correct these issues. II. Local Drainage Problems Does storm water run -off stand in the street or sidewalk in front of your house? As part of the storm sewer and sump drain design process, we would like to know if this or similar situations are occurring in your area. If so, please describe it in the local drainage problems section of the questionnaire. We will review them for possible corrective action. III. Private Underground Utilities Some residents install private underground utilities in the City owned boulevards, also called the right -of -way (ROW). These utilities are usually lawn irrigation or pet containment systems. Utility and roadway reconstruction can damage these utilities. If they are damaged, they will be restored only if you indicate that you have these systems on your returned questionnaire in the private underground utilities section. Additionally if the contractor knows the location of these private utilities, they'can attempt to avoid damaging them during construction. IV. Residential Streetlights As part 'of all reconstruction projects, staff typically asks if residents favor upgrading their streetlight system. In some cases, the streetlight system is at the end of its useful life and requires upgrading. We do not know yet the condition of your specific streetlight system; an evaluation will be done later on. Funding for streetlights are currently through special assessment. The typical cost is approximately $2,000 to $3,000 per REU or, per property. In the residential streetlight option section of the questionnaire are examples of the different styles of streetlighting that could be installed in your neighborhood. Please rank your style preferences. Please note that ranking your style preferences does not mean you are in favor of streetlights. G: \Engineering\Improvements\BA371 Killarney Shores Street Recon (2011) \PRELIM DESIGN \FEASIBILITY\Informational Meeting\BA -371 Survey_Letter.doc APPENDIX B 3of7 2011 Killarney Shores Street Reconstruction — Resident Questionnaire Page 3 of 3 V. Pedestrian Issues As part of all reconstruction projects, staff typically asks if residents see a need to add sidewalks to the neighborhood. Funding for sidewalks is split between special assessment, City of Edina and the Edina School District (if the sidewalk falls within a school walking zone). The typical cost to add a couple blocks of sidewalks to a multi -block area is $300 -$600 per REU or, per property. If you know of a problem at a pedestrian crossing, missing sidewalk or other pedestrian issues please tell us about it in that section of the questionnaire. VI. Traffic Management The Edina Transportation Commission typically reviews traffic issues on local streets. We would like to know if you feel that your roadway has any traffic issues. Please tell us about it in the traffic management section of the questionnaire. Receive Project Updates via the City Extra If you sign up for our "City Extra" e-mail notification service, you will receive project updates as they occur. During feasibility study preparations, such updates are usually notifications of upcoming meetings. Later, if the Council chooses to proceed with construction of this project, the updates will occur weekly. During construction, the updates will include information such as when access to your driveway might be limited or when to have your contractor repair your private lawn irrigation system if it was damaged by construction activities. The "City Extra" is our best form of communication with you. This service is free and allows individuals to sign up to receive e-mail messages from the City on a variety of topics. To sign up for the service go to the City Extra website at http : / /cityextra.cityofedina.com and place a check mark in the box next to this project's name, "Killarney Shores Street Reconstruction" Please contact the City at 952 - 927 -8861 if you are having trouble signing up for City Extra. Questions If you have questions after reading this letter, please email me at Iullivan ,ci.edina.mn.us or call me at 952 - 826 -0445. Sincerely, Jack D. Sullivan, PE Assistant City Engineer Enclosed: Property Owner's Questionnaire Self- Addressed Stamped Envelope G:\Engineering \Improvements \BA371 Killarney Shores Street Recon (2011) \PRELIM DESIGN \FEASIBILITY\Informational Meeting\BA -371 Survey_Letter.doc 1 "7. .- 8I \6013 8 6404 *1 Ice 6401 5809- ��,••' 5808 11 O 5814 ,••' Val, 6300- +,.' 5901- ' 04 03 F 5904} �� �. +'' 6308- 114c$' � 00� 905 5908 ' 5912 •'/5903 J 5904 V5909 - - -- - -- — , 900 5905 5908 5913 _ 5916 _ ' ! - - -� 5920 5902 5909 5912 5917. 5904 5916 5921 5924 ° a, 5913 5908 - - - - -- 5928 LL 5917 5920 Z 5925 a 31 6000 �— -- 6000 - -- 6001 6000 s 6001 6004 2 - -- 6004 6005 6004 ; 6005 6008 - i 6008 - - - 6009 6008 6009 ,1616012 6012 6015 6012 • 6013 _�— - -- - - --- I` - - -- 6016 6017 6016 6017 =,\ - 1 6020 6021 6020 6021 .�; , 6024 6025 .� 6029 6� 024 , 6032 `;6028 ti � � +ae.���-wwwwwswww *.w�www +� PROJECT LIMITS APPENDIX B 4of7 Project Area " e y Killarney Shores Street Reconstruction w s � Y° E Improvement No: BA -371 October. 201 pt APPENDIX B 5of7 October 4, 2010 owe PROPERTY OWNERS QUESTIONNAIRE 2011 KILLARNEY SHORES o, ay STREET RECONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA Please do not answer these questions until after you have read the entire newsletter. Please complete and return this survey by October 18, 2010, using the self - addressed stamped - envelope. Drainage Service Connection: A. Does your home have a drain tiletfooting drain? B. Does your home have a sump pump? O Yes ® No ®Unknown ® Yes ® No ®Unknown C. Would you be willing to connect your sump pump ® Yes up to a City drain if provided (at your own cost)? D. Would you be willing to connect your roof drains O Yes up to a City drain if provided (at your own cost)? Please sketch in the space to the right: your house, garage, driveway, sump pump discharge location and approximately where along the right -of —way (ROW) line you would like the service connection pipe located. HOUSE ® No [Milki . HOUSE SERVICE ©CONNECTION PIPE HERE Local Drainage Problems — please list specific surface water drainage problems in your neighborhood: III. Private Underground Utilities A. Do you have an underground lawn irrigation system in the City's right -of -way? (Typically the right -of -way is 10' to 15' behind the roadway.) O Yes ® No B. Do you have an underground electric pet containment system in the City's right -of -way? ® Yes O No 1 of 3 APPENDIX B 6of7 October 4, 2010 IV. Residential Streetlights: A. Do you favor upgrading your streetlights (there is a special assessment cost of approximately $2,000 to $3,000 per REU)? O Yes ■ M. B. If the streetlights are upgraded, which style do you prefer? Please rank all the styles from 1 to 5, with 5 being most liked. Please answer even if you answered "No" in section IV. A. Acorn: Coach: Style can be viewed along Concord Ave Style can be viewed in the Sunnyslope from Valley View Rd to South View Ln, neighborhood, just north of Edina City Edina. Hall, Edina. n Dislike 13 13 0 O O Like 1 2 3 4 5 Arlington Lantern: Style can be viewed in the Country Club neighborhood, just north of West 5dh St along Wooddale Ave, Edina. Dislike 13 0 0 0 13 Like 1 2 3 4 5 V. Pedestrian Issues: Dislike D 0 0 0 0 Like 1 2 3 4 5 Round Lantern: Style can be viewed at County Road 101 and W 7e St North, Maple Grove. �h Dislike O O O O O Like 1 2 3 4 5 A. Knowing that residents pay a portion of sidewalk costs in Edina, do you see a need to add new sidewalks in your neighborhood? B. If Yes, Where? O Yes O No 2of3 APPENDIX B 7of7 October 4, 2010 C. Please list specific neighborhood pedestrian issues below. VI. Traffic Management A. Do you feel your neighborhood or roadway has any traffic issues? O Yes O No B. If yes, what is it and where does it occur? Thank you for your cooperation. Please return this questionnaire in the enclosed self- addressed, stamped - envelope. Please complete all questions and return to the City of Edina by October 18.2010. 3of3 Killanrey Shores Stl. .construction 2011 Property Questionnaire BA -381 Data Entered BY a.— Waact Last Date Data Ent d: Due Data: Quesuamatres sent out: as Qaeeae -ellea Returnetl: 42 Percent RBWmeE: 62% n. ..iDIX C 1of1 wr� ®�wwawawww.we® awwewl�■sA� ewe - ®w� -I w� ®e�w�ww�w��w a��wwweeew ■w��ww� � ®wew�ww�w�w� _ . �w�eww■e�■ew■���ww® �AI(AL�■■ww�■■■wew ®ww® wwww■wwwww■www��ww- a,�,�.���,...�,a,,,,, ,n�a„ tt'95�11� o e 0 •�'� .- 3anN�jP •' APPENDIX D 1 of 2 December 3, 2010 City of Edina RE: Killarney Shores Neighborhood Reconstruction Project Dear Resident: The City of Edina has initiated the process of roadway and utility improvements for the summer of 2011 for your neighborhood. As part of the public involvement process the City held an open house on September 20, 2010, to discuss a typical roadway reconstruction project. The next step is to hold an informational meeting to discuss the improvements more specific to your neighborhood. We are hosting a neighborhood- informational meeting for the Killarney Shores Neighborhood Reconstruction Project on December 13, 2010, from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., at the new Public Works and Park Maintenance Facility, located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. The meeting will consist of a 20 minute presentation starting shortly after 7:00 pm that will cover such items as work to be done, preliminary project costs, estimated assessment, etc. followed by a short question and answer session. Please see the map on the back side of this letter for the preliminary project area. If you cannot attend the informational meeting the presentation can be made available to you after the meeting. Please contact the Engineering Department at 952 - 826 -0371. Sincerely, Jack D. Sullivan, P.E. Assistant City Engineer G :U?ngineeringUmprovements\BA371 Killarney Shores Street Recon (201 [)\PRELIM DESIGN\FEASIBILITY \informational Meeting\20101203_BA371 Neighborhood Informatioal_Meeting_Letter.doc City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952- 826 -0390 TTY 952 -826 -0379 ' 5809- 5808 11 6401 PROJECT UNITS APPENDIX D 2of2 oe" " z Project Area w _N� E >( o Killarney Shores Street Reconstruction S r° Improvement No: BA -371 Eo a °za,a' J��•- — \ Sig � 5814 6300- . 5901- ' 5904 04 •,v ,• °� 03 6308 - OP .p+••••�DO 5905 5908 1 .• 5912 6400 ! 5903 5904 5909 - 5916 900 5905 5908 5913 _ - - 5920 5902 - - 5909 5912 5917 5904 5916 5921 5924 5913 Q 5908 - 5928 W 5917 5920 J 5925 _ 6000 -- 6000 8 g 6001 6000 s 6001 __ 6004 6004 6005 6004 6005 6013 6008 6008 6009 6008 6009 1 -- 408 s, 6012 — -- 6012 •ti.�,... 6013 6012 6015 _ 6404 - -- - 6016 6017 6016 6017 _ - -� 6400 _ -� - 6020 • 6021 6020 6021 - : �\,. , 6024 <6025 )5 •. /6029L ,, . 6032/6028 6401 PROJECT UNITS APPENDIX D 2of2 oe" " z Project Area w _N� E >( o Killarney Shores Street Reconstruction S r° Improvement No: BA -371 Eo a °za,a' INFORMATIONAL MEETING POWERPOINT PRESENTATION City of Edina December 13, 2010 Neighborhood Informational Meeting Killarney Shores Roadway Improvements BA -371 C30 CITY OF EDINA Input Opportunities PURPOSE OF MEETING IS TO INFORM AND TO GATHER PUBLIC INPUT FROM YOU • Use Post -it notes and place on map • Fill out comment cards • Tell us /Phone us • Write /Email us • Speak at Public Hearing HOLD ALL QUESTIONS UNTIL AFTER PRESENTATION ®0 CITY OF EDINA Agenda Introductions Reconstruction Video Typical Project Process Project Details • Existing Conditions • Plans • Preliminary Assessments Project Schedule APPENDIX E 1 of 6 QOCITY OF EDINA Agenda Introductions Reconstruction Video Typical Project Process Project Details • Existing Conditions • Plans • Preliminary Assessments Project Schedule ®C3 CITY OF EDINA Agenda Introductions Reconstruction Video Typical Project Process Project Details • Existing Conditions • Plans • Preliminary Assessments Project Schedule Mo Typical Process CITY OF EDIMA Special Assessed Projects Chapter 429 of MN State Statute • Initiation of Improvement project by Council (staff) or by petition. • Public Open House to Inform residents of project and to take comments and Input. • Ten days notice Is sent to affected property owners and legal notice Is pplaced In paper (Edina Sun) prior to Public vearing. • Feasibility Report prepared by Professional Engineer and accepted by Council. 1 INFORMATIONAL MEETING ?OWERPOINT PRESENTATION On CITY OF EDINA Typical Process (continued) • Conduct Public Hearing to order the project. • Ordering of improvement project requires a majority of Council If petitioned by residents (normally 3 of 5 Council votes If >35% signatures of assessed properties) or 4 of 5 Council votes if project is not Initiated by residents (or lacking 35% signatures). • Levy of special assessments is typically held at the completion of the project through a Final Assessment Hearing. ©o CITY OF EDINA Typical Process Assessment Policy Neighborhood reconstruction: • Based on residential equivalent unit (REU) • Single family home Is 1 REU • Adjacent properties with side yards are assessed 1/3 REU • (Based on address of property). Do CITY OF EDINA Typical Process Eill Assessment Policy Final assessment Hearing After Project is Complete Special Assessment Payment: 1. Pay entire balance 2. Partial payment (25% minimum) 3. Spread payment over 10 years 4. Senior deferral APPENDIX E 2of6 ©a CITY OF EDINA Typical Process (continued) • All preliminary (estimates) until project is completed at end of project. • Once City Council orders project, assessments become pending. • Final assessment are typically not more than 10% of pending assessment. • Typically assessments are lower than pending amount. C3C3 CITY OF EDINA Typical Process Assessment Policv Interest Rate: Typically 5.5% to 7.5% Based on 10 year Aaa bond rate plus 2% Payback Period: up to 10 years EaE) CITY OF EDINA Agenda Introductions Reconstruction Video Typical Project Process Project Details • Existing Conditions • Plans • Preliminary Assessments Project Schedule 2 INFORMATIONAL MEETING POWERPOINT PRESENTATION CITY OF EDINA I ea�! {-I ~� ,�\�•r Project Details EZ -. he ' Ii.rrtw.. u... r•r�.mKn<. YpwsW W: tw-�11 *: CITY OF EDINA Project Details Proposed Street Improvements: Spot repair on existing curb and gutter. Blacktop thickness increased. �f I APPENDIX E 3 of 6 rim CITY OF EDINA Project Details • Project initiated by City staff. • Street originally constructed late 1960's. • Watermain constructed in late 1960's. • Normal maintenance performed on street. • Street pavement approaching end of useful life. Typical life of street varies ( -35 years). • Storm water drainage issues. • Steel gas main and service pipes. 119 CI7Y OF EDINA Project Details ^1 Issues / concerns we do know about: • Storm water drainage issues. • Landscaping placed in boulevard. • Irrigation systems & pet containment fences G` INFORMATIONAL MEETING POWERPOINT PRESENTATION Project CITY OF EDINA Details ITS CITY OF EDINA Project Details Improvements do not include: Based on returned questionnaires • Sidewalks • Street lighting onCITY OF EDINA AssessmentE APPENDIX E 4of6 Project Details Proposed Utility Improvements: • New fire hydrants • Sanitary sewer spot repairs and replacement • Storm sewer upgrades • New sump pump drain pipe No CITY OF EDINA Project Details Assessments • Assessment History • Estimated Project Assessments `a; CITY OF EDINA Assessments I. i 4 INFORMATIONAL MEETING POWERPOINT PRESENTATION Project Details Assessments Killarney Shores $750,000 Special Assessed 79 REU's $9,500 per REU :: CITY OF EDINA Agenda Introductions Reconstruction Video Typical Project Process Project Details Existing Conditions Plans Preliminary Assessments Project Schedule CITY OF EDINA on Questions? Comments? APPENDIX E 5of6 we CITY OF EDINA Preliminary Project Details 1 Anticipated Schedule Open House Meeting ......................Sept. Assessments Informational Meeting ......................Nov. 30, 2010 Feasibility Report/Public Hearing .....Jan /Feb 2011 Bid Opening ........... ..........................March 2011 J { 2011 Begin Construction .... ............................May $9,500 t! *L 2011 Final Assessment Hearing ...........................2012 0$105,000 �r: CITY OF EDINA Project Schedule Anticipated Schedule Open House Meeting ......................Sept. 20, 2010 Informational Meeting ......................Nov. 30, 2010 Feasibility Report/Public Hearing .....Jan /Feb 2011 Bid Opening ........... ..........................March 2011 Award Contract ...... ..........................March 2011 Begin Construction .... ............................May 2011 Complete Construction ..........................Fall 2011 Final Assessment Hearing ...........................2012 5 APPENDIX E 6of6 KILLARNEY SHORES NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATIONAL MEETING DECEMBER 13, 2010 © l MW I , - X* We ; , - • - E - © •e J / '� W4, ' / / /�i ��Li,M APPENDIX F 1 of 4 I't JW III To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: II.J. iFrom" . Wayne Houle, PE Action Public Works Directbli!f` Discussion City Engineer � Information Date: January 4, 2011 Subject: Resolution No. 2011-09, Setting Public Hearing for Improvement Projects: 1. BA -371 Killarney Shores Street. Reconstruction (0211120.11) 2. BA,372 McCauley Heights Street. Reconstruction (02/1/2011) 3. BA-373 Oscar Roberts $tr6ef'Reconst*rdct1i6h (02/1/2011) 1 ACTION. REQUESTED; Approve attached Resolution No. 2011-09, calling for Public Hearing on February I., 2011 for.Kill.arney Shores Street Improvements. No. 13A- 371;:McCauley Heights Street Improvement: No. BA 372 and Oscar Roberts Street Improvement. No. BA-373. INFORMATION/14ACK.OkOUNEI; City staff is requesting public hearings for three neighborhood street reconstruction :projects. All projects are ainitiated by staff and have included. an extensive public :process. FeasOilit 8 the projects Will be pr686ffied to CbUb il y reports for e three 0 prior to the public fiepfi ngs. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2011-09 G:lEfigineeiin,gllryiprdVeinents1BA372 McCauley Heights Recon (201 I)IPRELIM DESIGNIFEASIBILII HearinglItern 11. J. Resolution No. 2011-09 Setting Public . Hearings for linprovement PrqjeqIs.4pox 0 RESOLUTION .NO. 2011-09 SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR FEBRUARY 1,'2011 FOR NEIGHBORHOOD STREET RECONSTRUCTION FOR: KILLARNEY SHORES, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA-371 McCAULEY HEIGHTS, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA--312 OSCAR ROBERTS, IMPROVEMENT- NO. BA-373 APPENDIX F 2 of 4 City of NOW, THEREFORE, :BE IT RESOLVED .BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA., MINNESOTA, the Council Chambers . that :a public hearing .shall be held on the 1 st day-of February, 2011, in ber at City y Hall !at 7:0- 0 P-M, to donsi . d I &.stmet reconstruction . tioh -in the neighborhoods of: o Killarney Shores, IfflordV6rherit No. , BA-371; mccaiAley:HbIghts, improvomOht'No. BA-372;. Oscar Roberts, Improvement No, BA-373. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the e C ty ChOrk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing And improvements as. required by `law. Dated: January 4, 2011 Aft6si:— Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE,OF.M1-NNE-SOTA) COUNTY Ty- OF HENNE�PIN) 88 CITY OF EDINA James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK 1, the undersigned duly appointed and acting. City Clerk- for the 0. ity of Edinp do hereby certify y that the attached and foregoing Resolution Was duly -adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 4, 2011, and as recorded in thie'Minutes of said Regular.Meeting: WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _ day of. -- 120 City Clerk dAy14A.11. 952-927:.8861 :FAX 952-026=0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424-1394 w 4801 WEST 50TH:STREET ww.icityofodina.com T' T'Y 9 5 2* - 8'2'6' - 0' 3* 7 9, APPENDIX F 3of4 January 14, 2011 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -371 KILLARNEY SHORES NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS The Edina City Council will meet at Edina City Hall, on Tuesday, February 1, 2011, at 7:00 p.m., to consider the public hearing on roadway improvements for Killarney Shores Neighborhood. This hearing is being conducted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. This hearing has been called as a recommendation from staff. The proposed project would be constructed in the summer of 2011 with the assessment hearing occurring in the fall of 2012. The estimated project cost is $750,000. The cost of the project will be funded by special assessment. The estimated cost per assessable lot is $9,740 per residential equivalent unit. The assessments can be divided over a ten -year period with interest accumulating on the unpaid balance. The area proposed to be assessed the cost of the proposed improvement includes the following: 5900 to 6029 Killarney Lane, 5900 to 6032 Schaefer Road, and 5900 to 5024 View Lane. Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties which are considered to be benefited by the improvement. The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing. APPENDIX F 4of4 (OFFICIAL PUBLICATION) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING KILLARNEY SHORES NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -371 The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall on Tuesday, February 1, 2011, at 7:00 p.m. to consider the following proposed improvements to be constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. Killarney Shores Neighborhood Roadway Improvement Estimated Total Assessment Cost Improvement No. BA -371 $750,000 The area proposed to be assessed by the proposed improvements includes all properties between and including: 5900 to 6029 Killarney Lane, 5900 to 6032 Schaefer Road, and 5900 to 5024 View Lane. These properties are proposed to be assessed at approximately $9,740 per residential equivalent unit. Debra Mangen City Clerk PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE EDINA SUN ON January 20 and 27, 2011. PLEASE SEND TWO (2) AFFIDAVITS OF PUBLICATION. BILL TO CITY OF EDINA. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 40 PENDING ASSESSMENT ROLL KILLARNEY SHORES IMPROVEMENTS BA -371 APPENDIX G 1 of 2 STREET PID# LEGAL STREET OWNER LOT BLOCK ASSESSABLE REU ASSESSMENT COST Notes Killarney Ln 3111721410056 5900 Robert & Susan E Vannelli 0.80 $7,786.76 3111721410066 5901 ConnieJ Jassen 0.80 $7,786.76 3111721410057 5902 Colin M & Katherine W Anderson 0.80 $7,786.76 Different Mailing Address 3111721410065 5903 Gary & Nicko R Porter 0.80 $7,786.76 3111721410058 5904 James A & Hamet H Abdo 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721410013 5905 Daniel R Launla & Karen M Polacek 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721410060 5908 David M & Lynn E Rudick 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721410012 5909 Philip A & Kirby M Hirschey 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721410011 5913 Robert W & Mary Lou Johnson 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721410010 5917 Gregory L & Laura Lucas - Silvis 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721440044 6000 Todd W & Kathryn J Kessel 1,00 $9,733.45 3111721440019 6001 James E Nelson & Ellen M Durkinl 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721440045 6004 Wade A & Elaine C Medlar 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721440018 6005 Edward & Therese Meszaros 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721440046 6008 Barbara A Thomdike Gensmer 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721440017 6009 Kenneth & Gloria Liao 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721440047 6012 Reid & Came Kilberg 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721440016 6013 Roger D Branign 111 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721440015 6017 Daniel R & Mary S Hurley 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721440014 6021 Gregory J & Katherine R Frey 1.00 $9.733.45 3111721440013 6025 Robert A & Mary K Melander 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721440012 6029 Brandon D & Jolene R Lew 1.00 $9,733.45 Schaefer Rd 3111721410067 5900 Kenneth A Gere 0.80 $7,786.76 Different Mailing Address 3111721410068 5902 Kenneth A & Dorothy P Gere 0.80 $7,786.76 Different Mailing Address 3111721410047 5904 Phillip J & Kendra Krolik 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721410048 5908 Anthony A & Susan P Termer 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721410049 5912 Youping Mel & Wenzhong Jin 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721410050 5916 Peter G & Rebecca A Boosalis 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721410051 5920 Jonathan K Glaser 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721410052 5924 Terrence B & Joyce Colleran 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721410053 5928 Gene & Darlene Stillpass 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721440028 6000 Douglas & Esperanza Stefanik 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721440029 6004 James E & Kann A Callanan 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721440030 6008 Ernest L & Joyce M Friedman 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721440031 6012 Joseph Alexander 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721440032 6016 Jon K & Yuko S Moon 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721440033 6020 Richard J & Donna M Profta 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721440034 6024 Knsd M Rogers 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721440035 6028 Ian C & Nancy L Frykman 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721440036 6032 Richard B & Susan J Crockett 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721410022 24 City of Edina 11.00 $107,067.98 View Lin 3111721410054 5900 Eugene Vacanti& Christine M Johnson 0.80 $7,786.76 3111721410073 5901 George & Jan Bodnia 0.80 $7,786.76 3111721410055 5902 Bruce H & Rebecca M Johnson, Crystal Warner, Emily A Wamer 0.80 $7,786.76 Different Mailing Address 3111721410073 5903 George & Jan Bodnia 0.80 $7,786.76 3111721410005 5904 Enc W Goad 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721410020 5905 Robert F & Diane H Reed Jr 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721410006 5908 Thomas P & Mary L Costell, 1.00 $9,733.45 G:IEngineenngllr, ts18A371 Killarney Shores Street Recon (2011)1PRELIM DESIGNTEASIBILIMBA -371 Pending Assessment Roll.xlsx of 2 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 PEN' ASSESSN, ROLL KILLARNEY SHORES IMPROVEMENTS BA -371 APPEI G ,2 STREET PID # LEGAL STREET OWNER LOT BLOCK ASSESSABLE REU ASSESSMENT COST Notes 3111721410019 5909 Steven Faul 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721410007 5912 Ali Khalaf Hassan & Mary Alice Femnte 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721410018 5913 Paul P & Jacqueline M Kempf 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721410008 5916 Brian D & Jacqueline M Johnson 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721410017 5917 Rebecca M Noms & Lynn A Moline 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721410009 5920 Sally Fossum 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721410016 5921 Dean W Rose 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721410015 5925 Beverly Swanson 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721440005 6000 Robert & Sue Stover 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721440042 6001 Bert T & Carol A Guinea 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721440006 6004 Edward & Lucille Hribar 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721440041 6005 Joseph G & Lynn S Schmitt 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721440007 6008 Glenn C & Diana S Massey 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721440040 6009 Michael Mccabe 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721440008 6012 Paul T Kile & Laura J Pingry-Kite 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721440039 6015 Michael W & Dana T Adams 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721440009 6016 Douglas G & Wendy S Petersen 1.00 $9,733. 5 3111721440038 6017 David P Pahos & Cindy M Perusse 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721440010 6020 Bruce A & Joan M Bisping 1.00 $9 733.45 3111721440037 6021 Thomas W & Rhonda A Cronin 1.00 $9,733.45 3111721440011 6024 Ronald & Betty J Voltin 1.00 $9.733.45 NOTES' Total 77.00 $749,475.85 PRELIMINARY TOTAL ROADWAY COSTI $ 749475.85 TOTAL ASSESSMENT REU 77.00 AVERAGE COST PER REU S 9,733.45 G: \Engineering \Improvements \BA371 Killarney Shores Street Recon (2011) \PRELIM DESIGN \FEASIBILITY\BA -371 Pending Assessment Roll.xlsx 2 of 2 158'WXNOWIL; MIN 1100 62 IR fin I v1 1111 ME o .�.... T::'3m ;R 111 _. 17 31 ty9S��j ok e ��, FEASIBILITY STUDY — BA 372 �o ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT •,ti�n�£9. CITY OF EDINA McCAULEY HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS JANUARY 18, 2011 LOCATION: The Project includes McCauley Terrace, McCauley Circle and Post Lane. The drawing below is a detailed project location map of the McCauley Heights Neighborhood Roadway Improvements (Figure 1). Figure 1. Project Area Map PROJECT LIMITS S -- '���•• 6301 630 .r' 305 = V J+ 6317 6400 630 6313 6302 03 6301 PMLN �O+ 6306 6305 6412 6312 6316 _ 1 6405 640 6320 6310 - 6409 641 6314 63 = 6453 " 6416 6443 .. 6318 6451 ................... : - 6447 .-6449 6445 ♦ 6429 ; 631 �� •6453 6433 6322 6432 6428 / 6455 6457 6436 6437 6440 6808 t "" ' �� a( o (e Project Area W " E McCauley Heights Street Reconstruction S Improvement No: BA -372 E p " Figure 1. Project Area Map Feasibility Study McCauley Heights Neighborhood Improvements No. BA -372 January 18, 2011 INITIATION & ISSUES: The McCauley Heights Neighborhood project was initiated by the Engineering Department as part of the City's street reconstruction program and Capital Improvement Program to update aging infrastructure and .address several issues including drainage problems, sanitary sewer problems and watermain improvements. Comprehensive Plan All Engineering projects are reviewed for compatibility with the City of Edina 2008 comprehensive Plan Update. Figure 7. 10, Sidewalk Facilities and 7.11, Bicycle Facilities in the Appendix do not indicate any proposed sidewalk, paths or bicycle facilities within the project limits. Staff Issues The following are existing features and resident comments that present issues in determining the feasibility of the project and are addressed in this report: • Surface rainwater drainage and storm sewer issues Poor condition of existing pavement • Existing landscaping, retaining walls, driveways, etc. • Sanitary sewer and watermain deficiencies • Existing mature trees • Existing lighting Resident Input The residents of the reconstruction area were invited to an Open House on September 20, 2010 to discuss the City's process for street reconstruction. This meeting was followed up with a questionnaire sent to the property owners on October 4, 2010. The questionnaires were completed and returned by 20 of the 27 property owners, a return rate of 74 %. The full questionnaire and responses can be found in the Appendix. The two key issues that were addressed in this questionnaire were the addition of new sidewalks and installation of decorative lighting. The responses to those questions are shown in Table 1. McCAULEY HEIGHTS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT — Results from October 4, 2010 Questionnaire Sheet Questionnaires Questionnaires Prefer New Sidewalk Change Existing Sent Returned Lighting Yes No Yes No 27. 20 1 19 0 20 % of Returned 74% 5% * 95 %* 0 %* 100 %* Questionnaires * Percentages are based on responses of returned questionnaires and may not equal 100% if questions were not answered on questionnaire. Table 1. Results from Questionnaire Page 2 of 8 Feasibility Study McCauley Heights Neighborhood Improvements No.. DA -372 January 18, 2011 A neighborhood informational meeting was then held on January 10, 2011 to discuss the improvements planned for this neighborhood. The meeting was attended by 13 residents representing 10 properties. Input from this meeting and comments received throughout the planning of this project have been included in the Appendix. EXISTING CONDITIONS: Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer The sanitary sewer was installed in two phases during 1966 and 1975. There have been very few sewer blockages in this neighborhood. The trunk sanitary sewer mains were inspected using a televising system and are in satisfactory condition with the exception of a few localized areas. Watermain The watermain was installed in 1968. There have been very few reports of trunk watermain and service pipe issues in this neighborhood. Storm Sewer The limited storm sewer in this neighborhood was installed in the mid to late 1960's. This includes storm sewer piping that drains water from McCauley Trail South and surface water within the project limits to Arrowhead Lake, which is just south of the project limits. The project area is located within the legal boundary of Minnehaha Creek Watershed. Private Utilities Providers of privately owned gas, electric,; communications and cable television utilities are present in the neighborhood. All the utilities are overhead with the exception of the gas lines. Street lighting consists of standard "cobra head" lights mounted on wood poles that are typically located at intersections. A few homeowners have front yard lights that help illuminate the street corridors. Streets McCauley Terrace was or constructed in 1976 without concrete curb and gutter and has a roadway width of approximately 23 to 24 feet wide. The rest of the neighborhood, McCauley Circle. and Post Lane, currently has concrete curb and gutter with a roadway width of approximately 31 -feet wide. The pavement condition varies throughout the neighborhood and is in relatively poor condition (Photos 1 & 2). The average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) for the City of Edina is 57 and the average PCI for McCauley Heights is 33. Examples of the raveling and alligator cracking can be seen in photos 1 & 2. The City of Edina, with the help of a pavement consultant; reviews a, third of the city's roadway every year. The streets are graded based on a number of conditions such as sagging, alligator cracking, raveling and potholes. Streets are rated on a scale from 0 to 100; with 0 being 'extremely poor and 100 representing a brand new road. surface. It is the City's practice to complete a total Page 3 of 8 Feasibility Study McCauley Heights Neighborhood Improvements No. BA -372 January 18, 2011 reconstruction of the streets when the PCI is less than 45, a Mill and Overlay project when the PCI is between 45 and 65, and Seal Coats for PCI greater than 65 and less than 95. The pavement throughout these streets appears to be near the end of its useful life while the costs to maintain and repair the roadways are steadily increasing. Overlaying or seal coating the pavement is no longer feasible. Landscaping Some property owners have placed boulders or other obstructions within the City right -of -way creating barriers along the roadway. These types of barriers and landscaping items are prohibited from being placed in the boulevard in accordance with Edina City Code 1200.02. Other typical items exist adjacent to the roadway such as retaining walls, concrete driveways, landscaping, shrubs, trees and fences. Photo 1. Existing Pavement Condition Page 4of8 Feasibility Study McCauley Heights Neighborhood Improvements No. BA -372 January 18, 2011 Photo 2. Existing Pavement Condition IMPROVEMENTS: The McCauley Heights Neighborhood project involves localized rehabilitation of sanitary sewer, upgrades to the storm sewer system, upgrades to fire hydrants, construct new concrete curb and gutter, and reconstruction of bituminous pavement. Public Utilitie Sanitary Sewer The sanitary sewer main was televised in the fall of 2010. After televising, staff evaluated the exiting main and found that the majority of the sewer main is in satisfactory condition except for isolated areas requiring spot repair. Watermain Watermain rehabilitation is proposed including upgrading all hydrants. Storm Sewer on segments within the project limits, The addition of barrier style B618 curb and gutter is proposed for all streets within the project that currently do not have curb and gutter. The remainder of the neighborhood with concrete curb and gutter will receive spot repairs that are no longer functioning properly. Page 5 of 8 Feasibility Study McCauley Heights Neighborhood Improvements No. BA -372 January 18, 2011 The storm sewer network will have modifications to improve existing drainage issues at various locations throughout the neighborhood. Some of the existing structures will be removed and replaced due to their poor condition. Private Utilities CenterPoint Energy, local gas utility company, has minimal work and majority of work should be done in the boulevard. The other privately utility owners have expressed some interest in upgrading some of their networks within the project limits. Staff will continue to communicate with these private utility companies for any anticipated improvements. Streets The City is recommending the addition of barrier style concrete curb and gutter on all streets that do not currently have concrete curb and gutter. The project will reconstruct the streets with a bituminous pavement surface. Residential Roadway Lighting and Sidewalks The questionnaire asked if residents wanted to add sidewalk or reconstruct the street lights in the project area. The results from Figure 2 show that property owners do not want to add sidewalk or reconstruct the street lights within the project. Therefore, staff is not recommending these items be part of the project. RIGHT -OF -WAY & EASEMENTS: The right -of -way for McCauley Circle and Post Lane is 50 feet wide. The right -of -way on McCauley Terrace is 36 feet wide. All proposed improvements stay within this right -of -way and no additional easement requirements are anticipated. PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $267,400 (Table 2). The total cost includes direct costs for engineering, clerical and construction finance costs from start of project to final assessment hearing. Funding for the entire project will be from a combination of special assessment and utility funds. The estimated roadway construction cost is $183,400 and will be 100 percent funded by special assessments. The new concrete curb and gutter is included under the storm sewer fund not under the roadway special assessment. Utility improvements and repairs amount to $84,000 and will be funded through the respective utility fund. Page 6 of 8 Feasibility Study McCauley Heights Neighborhood Improvements No. BA -372 January 18, 2011 Item Amount Total Cost Roadway: $ 183,400 6314 Roadway Total: 6416 $ 183,400 Utilities: 6443 6318 Storm Sewer $ 60,000 Watermain $ 13,000 631 Sanitary Sewer $ 11,000 6322 Utility Total: _ $ 84,000 Total Project: 6437 $ 267,400 Table 2. Estimated Project Costs ASSESSMENTS: The assessments are based on the City's Special assessment policy, dated September 7, 2010. Based on this policy there are 26.2 residential equivalent units (REU). The estimated assessment per REU is $7,200. (Figure 2) Preliminary Assessments - 0.6 REU - 1.0 REU L� 1.6 REU e tip J° 12 6301 / 1 I DJUU] PROJECT LIM Ts ))0 °JV 6313 6317 6302 6301 POST LH 6306 630 105 6312 6316 6320 6310 640 — Figure 2. Preliminary Map2. Prelimina�Assessment Map Page 7 of 8 641 rr 6314 6453 eR 6416 6443 6318 6451 ? 6447 6445 6429 631 64 6432 6433 6428 6322 6455 6457 6436 6437 6440 6808 - - -- %�. Preliminary Assessments N Wr e McCauley Heights Street Reconstruction Improvement No: BA-372 Figure 2. Preliminary Map2. Prelimina�Assessment Map Page 7 of 8 Feasibility Study McCauley Heights Neighborhood Improvements No. BA -372 January 18, 2011 PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint: Project Open House September 20, 2010 Neighborhood Informational Meeting January 10, 2011 Council Orders Public Hearing January 4, 2011 Receive Feasibility Report January 18, 2011 Public Hearing February 1, 2011 Bid Opening April 2011 Award Contract Spring 2011 Begin Construction Spring 2011 Complete Construction Fall 2011 Final Assessment Hearing Fall 2012 FEASIBILITY: Staff believes the construction of this project is necessary, cost effective and feasible to improve the public infrastructure in the McCauley Heights Neighborhood. APPENDIX: A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. 1. Open House Meeting Letter and Presentation Property Owners Questionnaire Questionnaire Results Informational Meeting Letter Information Meeting PowerPoint Presentation and Attendance List Project comments and Letters Received Recommendation to Set Public Hearing, Notice of Public Hearing to residents, and Notice of Public Hearing Advertisement Preliminary Assessment Roll City Comprehensive Plan Update — Sidewalk and Bicycle Facilities (Fig. 7.10 and 7.11) Page 8 of 8 APPENDIX A 1 OF 5 September 7, 2010 RE: 2011 Street Reconstruction Projects Dear Resident: Last fall you were notified that the City of Edina initiated the process of roadway and utility improvements for your neighborhood for the summer of 2011. At the same time you were also invited to an open house to learn more about the process. Once again, you are invited to attend a similar informational meeting on Monday, September 20, 7:00 p.m., at the new Public Works and Park Maintenance Facility, located at 7450 Metro Boulevard, see attached map on back. The meeting will consist of a short presentation starting at 7:15 p.m. with question and answer to follow. The presentation will cover topics such as "How are streets selected for reconstruction; Who funds the project; Special Assessment; What can I expect during construction; How can I stay informed." The exact amount that you will be assessed for this project will not be available in time for the open house; however, based on past projects, you can expect the amount to be between $8,000 to $12,000. To prepare for the meeting, please review the enclosed brochure "A Guide to Edina's Street Reconstruction Process ". Also for additional information on our Reconstruction Process please go to our website at http:// www. CityOfEdina.com /FutureProjects. Please contact Assistant City Engineer, Jack Sullivan if you have any questions or if you are unable to attend and would like more information on the process. Jack can be reached at isullivan(aD_ci.edina.mn.us or 952 - 826 -0445. Sincerely, Gam/ 0�w A4ae-,-z Wayne D. Houle, P.E. Director of Public Works and City Engineer G:\Engineering\Infrastructure \Streets \pavement management\Neighborhood Reconstruction Program \2011 and 2012 Street Recon\201 I Open House Letter.doc APPENDIX A 2OF5 -- W 70TH ST W 70TH - 3T CD o°c J J ' J V - m I' J 0 W W 74TH SNew Public Works Building <3: W 76TH S EDINA INDU RIAL W 77TH ST BLVD r------ - I i - - - -- City of Edina w °`mow New Public Works Building 7450 Metro Blvd w N_ E Edina, MN 55439 `G OPEN HOUSE for Neighborhood Roadway Improvements 2011 and 2012 TYPICAL TIMELINE FROM FIRST NOTIFICATION TO END OF CONSTRUCTION August Kick -off informational letter to residents Mid - September Open House (for preceding two years) Mid - October / November Neighborhood informational meeting - tgln, detaited project plans and estimated START cost are provided December / January Feasibility report and public hearing January / February / March Plan Preparation / Bidding April / May Construction starts October / November Construction finishes Spring Warranty work Summer / Fall Final Assessment Hearing 3 FUNDING Special Assessment pays 100% of the following (approximately $8,000 to $12,000 per Residential Equivalent Unit (REU): • Roadway - replacing entire roadbed • Sidewalks • Decorative Streetlights (optional) • Traffic Management (optional) APPENDIX A 3of5 AGENDA Introductions Road Reconstruction Video Presentation 1. Process 2. Funding sources 3. Assessments 4. Communication with residents 5. What to expect during construction 6. What can I do to prepare for the project? Questions FUNDING The Utility Fund which covers sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water main pays 100% of the following: Curb & Gutter Sanitary Sewer — trunk pipe only in the roadway Storm Sewer — trunk pipe in roadway and in easement on private property Water main — trunk pipe in roadway up to the curb stop of private property Sump Pump Pipe — for residents to connect sump pumps s NOPROCESS FROM START TO END tgln, END START M1mi my I A�� .-anm Sug CmiPln•, Fu.s,gly Sn dy biLtr _ blic PLn, Imrul I- f. - co����i- re�eoi• l— CwM etRemu 1 Carol E¢iam m i,,,jm Ilunng nd fiA protect. Project goes to the bovam o115d0 yev u0e0u1. ; 1.Ot°y FUNDING The Utility Fund which covers sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water main pays 100% of the following: Curb & Gutter Sanitary Sewer — trunk pipe only in the roadway Storm Sewer — trunk pipe in roadway and in easement on private property Water main — trunk pipe in roadway up to the curb stop of private property Sump Pump Pipe — for residents to connect sump pumps s WHAT DO YOUR TAXES PAY FOR? The Portion of Your Property Tax that the City Receives .iry of ea,,a 71 5 City 01 Ec�na ao °r ■ om�r Allocation Police Fire Parks Public Works Snowplowing Pothole Repairs Seal coating Other Street Maintenance COMMUNICATING WITH YOU Our first contact with you is when we inform you *11 be hlormaliom meeting, lollowed by public hearings notification; Open house; surveys; project plans and schedules; and nsnuction update letters via regular mail. Our last communication to you Is the notice of final special assessment hearing. g• F—Public hearings will be published in the Edina Sun Current. i - rte► Ouestionnaires will be sent during the early planning stage to help staff tormu la to a decision in areas such as street lighting and style of street lighting. ® Weakly construction updates will be sent via the "Gty Extra" email. Slay in the loop by signing up for INS tree service. �y► Lette r s may be delivered 11 inform you of lime- sanallWe events ouch as water shut -off the next ince 9 RESIDENT OUESTIONNAIRE The property owners questionnaire generally gathers information on the following topics: Sump Pump Discharge Service Line — do you have one and the location? Residential Roadway Lighting — do you want decorative street lights, style and pole location? Pedestrian Issues — what are the issues and do you favor sidewalk? Private Underground Utilities — do you have underground lawn irrigation and pet containment? Local Drainage Problems — have you noticed drainage issues in the neighborhood? APPENDIX A 4of5 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS — PAYMENT N 0 OPTIONS AI ' nal special assessment Pey , hearing is held the fall alter 1 enOrc a the project is completed J rvav-70 (sometimes one year biterj. s 12,0 to o Payabl Payable 10 years I Final assessment amounts are determined at That time, but cannot exceed 10 % of pending assessment. B HOW CAN YOU GIVE INPUT AND STAY INFORMED? • www.CilyolEdma.com Visit our websile regularly. Information Irom open houses and other communications are archived on our websile. - edinamail@cl.edlna.eom Drop us an email • 952- 826 -0371 Call us; office hours are 7:00 -3:30 p.m. • Slop by the office Public Works and Engineering Departments 7450 Metro Boulevard • Schedule an appointment 952- 826 -0371 BOULEVARD AREAS Property owner items located within the City's right of way may be damaged during construction: • Irrigation and pet containment systems will only be restored if indicated on the resident questionnaire. • Prior to construction, residents will be given an opportunity to remove plantings and other landscape features in the boulevard. • Boulevards will be restored with grass - regardless of previous planting or ,_ WHAT CAN YOU EXPECT DURING ' CONSTRUCTION? • That the City will keep you informed of activities • Private utility companies updating their systems prior to City's contractor • Dusty, noisy, muddy (watering trucks will help to keep dust down) • May be asked to limit water use • May be connected to temporary water WHAT CAN YOU DO TO PREPARE FOR THE PROJECT? • Begin financial planning for the assessment • Coordinate landscaping, driveway replacement and house remodeling projects with the reconstruction schedule • Complete questionnaire to provide feedback • Ask questions; inform staff of your concerns • Sign -up for "City Extra" to receive updates via email notification APPENDIX A 5of5 WHAT CAN YOU EXPECT DURING CONSTRUCTION? • Irrigation system and pet containment may be damaged • May not be able to access your driveway for up to seven days • May not be able to access the roadway for a few hours • Contractor will accommodate special needs �9SN�11.i, O e1 o t8 ,ss��z 0 �yO APPENDIX B 1 OF 7 October 4,'2010 City of Edina RE: 2011 McCauley Heiahts Street Reconstruction — Resident Questionnaire Dear Resident: The City of Edina has initiated the process of roadway and utility improvements for the summer of 2011 for your neighborhood. The first step was to hold an open house on September 20, 2010, for you to become familiar with the process. Things to know and consider: Residents pay a portion of the overall project cost in the form of a special assessment. A Typical special assessment ranges from $8,000 to $12,000 per Residential Equivalent Unit (REU) or, per property, and are payable over 10 years. The estimated special assessment for your neighborhood will not be determined until after information has been gathered from the questionnaires and a feasibility report is completed. You will not be billed for the special assessment until fall 2012. C Components of a project vary and are based on questionnaire responses. The special assessment typically includes cost of new roadway, sidewalk and streetlights. Other utility upgrades such as water main, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and concrete curb and gutter are funded through the utility fund and are not special. assessed. 0 Construction typically starts in spring /early summer and end in late fall of the same year. The next step is to get feedback from you regarding a number of key components of the project. The information you share with us is essential in determining certain aspects of the project that may be constructed. This information will be discussed at the project information meeting (date yet to be determined). The following information explains the questionnaire that is enclosed. A map showing the boundaries of the area to be reconstructed is attached to the back of this letter. After reading this letter completely, please complete the questionnaire and return by October 18, 2010, in the self - addressed stamped envelope. I. Drainage Service Connection Do you use a sump pump or have you considered installing one? Do you currently have a footing drain? The project could include a sump drain system along the roadway to collect groundwater, storm water runoff, and discharges from private sump pumps, roof drains or any other runoff from private property. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 APPENDIX B 20F7 2011 McCauley Heights Street Reconstruction— Resident Questionnaire Page 2 of 3 A typical sump pump discharges onto -a homeowner's lawn. This can cause problems with your lawn, your neighbor's lawn, your basement if your lawn drains back to your home or with the street if the sump pump constantly runs down the gutter line promoting algae growth. Discharging the sump pump into the sanitary sewer system such as floor drains or laundry tubs is against the law, both City Ordinance and State Statute. If the topography and final street designs favor a City sump drain system we will need to know if you currently have a sump pump or a footing drain. The line from the home to the City sump drain system would be your responsibility including any plumbing modifications needed to connect your sump pump. The City sump. drain system is funded through the storm sewer utility fund. We also would like to know about any local drainage problems. This might be an opportunity for the sump drain system to correct these issues. II. Local Drainage Problems Does storm water run -off stand in the street or sidewalk in front of your house? As part of the storm. sewer and sump drain design process, we would like to know if this or similar situations are occurring in your area. If so, please describe it in the local drainage problems section of the questionnaire. We will review them for possible corrective action. 111. Private Underground Utilities Some residents install private underground utilities in the City owned boulevards, also called the right -of -way (ROW). These utilities are usually lawn irrigation. or pet containment. systems. Utility and roadway reconstruction can damage these utilities. If they are damaged, they will be restored only if you indicate that you have these systems on your returned questionnaire in the private underground utilities section. Additionally if the contractor knows the location of these private utilities, they can attempt to avoid damaging them during. construction: IV. Residential Streetlights As part of all reconstruction projects, staff typically asks if residents favor upgrading their streetlight system. In some cases, the streetlight system is at the end of its useful life and requires upgrading. We do not know yet the condition of your specific streetlight system; an evaluation will be done later on. Funding for streetlights are currently through special assessment. The typical cost is approximately $2,000 to $3,000 per REU or, per property. In the residential streetlight option section of the questionnaire are examples of the different styles of streetlighting that could be installed in your neighborhood. Please rank your style preferences. Please note that ranking your style preferences does not mean you are in favor of streetlights. G: \Engineering \Improvements \BA372 McCauley Heights Recon (2011) \PRELIM DESIGN \FEASIBILITY \Informational Meeting \BA -372 Survey_Letter.doc 2011 McCauley Heights Street Reconstruction — Resident Questionnaire APPENDIX OF 7 Page 3 of 3 V. Pedestrian Issues As part of all reconstruction projects, staff typically asks if residents see a need to add sidewalks to the neighborhood. Funding for sidewalks is split between special assessment, City of Edina and the Edina School District (if the sidewalk falls within a school walking zone). The typical cost to add a couple blocks of sidewalks to a multi -block area is $300 -$600 per REU or, per property. If you know of a problem at a pedestrian crossing, missing sidewalk or other pedestrian issues please tell us about it in that section of the questionnaire. VI. Traffic Management The Edina Transportation Commission typically reviews traffic issues on local streets. We would like to know if you feel that your roadway has any traffic issues. Please tell us about it in the traffic management section of the questionnaire. Receive Project Updates via the City Extra If you sign up for our "City Extra" e-mail notification service, you will receive project updates as they occur. During feasibility study preparations, such updates are usually notifications of upcoming meetings. Later, if the Council chooses to proceed with construction of this project, the updates will occur weekly. During construction, the updates will include information such as when access to your driveway might be limited or when to have your contractor repair your private lawn irrigation system if it was damaged by construction activities. The "City Extra" is our best form of communication with you. This service is free and allows individuals to sign up to receive e-mail messages from the City on a variety of topics. To sign up for the service go to the City Extra website at http : / /citvextra.cityofedina.com and place a check mark in the box next to this project's name, "McCauley Heights Street Reconstruction" Please contact the City at 952- 927 -8861 if you are having trouble signing up for City Extra. Questions If you have questions after reading this letter, please email me at isullivanCa)ci.edina.mn.us or call me at 952 - 826 -0445. Sincerely, Jack D. Sullivan, PE Assistant City Engineer Enclosed: Property Owner's Questionnaire Self- Addressed Stamped Envelope G: \Engineering\lmprovements \BA372 McCauley Heights Recon (2011)VRELIM DESIGN \FEASIBILITY\Informational Meeting \BA -372 Survey__Letter doc APPENDIX B 4OF7 7 PROJECT LIMITS I 6301 ell / _ PJY�� 6400 /630 6313 6317 6302 6' — 6301 ++ �Q> �� 6lQ 37O 6) POST LN +� 1 OCR }7 �y G`V- 6306 630 +•.6412 640 6312 6316 6320 •'` 6405 6310 •'�� co�� o� 6409 641 ,J,.••••'`� 612 c °q� � .• •''` 6314 6453 6416 6443 6318 -' 16451 .• .............. ■ ■.....•�.. 6447 6445 14. 6429 63 6449 • �rrrrrrrrrrrr .• 6433 6322 •••`` •rrrrrrrr 6453 rr 6432 6428 6455 6457 6436 6437 64— 4 6808 �\A i Project Area W N E e N McCauley McCaule Heights Street Reconstruction S d� Y ) i ~ Improvement No: BA -372 Engineering Octobr,2 10 October, 2010 APPENDIX B 50F7 October 4, 2010 Ow a PROPERTY OWNERS QUESTIONNAIRE +n 2011 McCAULEY HEIGHTS o' .a'o' STREET RECONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA Please do not answer these questions until after you have read the entire newsletter. Please complete and return this survey by October 18, 2010, using the self - addressed stamped - envelope. I. Drainage Service Connection: A. Does your home have a drain tiletfooting drain? O Yes O No OUnknown B. Does your home have a sump pump? O Yes O No ®Unknown C. Would you be willing to connect your sump pump 0 Yes a No up to a City drain if provided (at your own cost)? D. Would you be willing to connect your roof drains O Yes ® No up to a City drain if provided (at your own cost)? HOUSE Please sketch in the space to the right: your house, garage, driveway, sump pump discharge location and approximately where along the right -of —way (ROW) line you would like the service connection pipe located. HOUSE SERVICE OCONNECTION X PIPE HERE II. Local Drainage Problems — please list specific surface water drainage problems in your neighborhood: III. Private Underground Utilities A. Do you have an underground lawn irrigation system in the City's right -of -way? (Typically the right -of -way is 10' to 15' behind the roadway.) ® Yes O No B. Do you have an underground electric pet containment system in the City's right -of -way? 0 Yes 1 of 3 =Mil APPENDIX B 6OF7 October 4, 2010 IV. Residential Streetlights: A. Do you favor upgrading your streetlights (there is a special assessment cost of approximately $2,000 to $3,000 per REU)? 13 Yes 13 No B. If the streetlights are upgraded, which style do you prefer? Please rank all the styles from 1 to 5, with 5 being most liked. Please answer even if you answered "No" in section IV. A. Acorn: Coach: Style can be viewed along Concord Ave Style can be viewed in the Sunnyslope from Valley View Rd to South View Ln, neighborhood, just north of Edina City Edina. Hall, Edina. 0 Dislike 0 0 0 O 0 Like 1 2 3 4 5 Arlington Lantern: Style can be viewed in the Country Club neighborhood, just north of West 50"' St along Wooddale Ave, Edina. Dislike O O O O O Like 1 2 3 4 5 V. Pedestrian Issues: Dislike O O O O C3 Like 1 2 3 4 5 Round Lantern: Style can be viewed at County Road 109 and W 78"' St North, Maple Grove. Dislike 0 0 17 C1 O Like 1 2 3 4 5 A. Knowing that residents pay a portion of sidewalk costs in Edina, do you see a need to add new sidewalks in your neighborhood? B. If Yes, Where? O Yes 0 No 2of3 APPENDIX B 7OF7 October 4, 2010 C. Please list specific neighborhood pedestrian issues below. VI. Traffic Management A. Do you feel your neighborhood or roadway has any traffic issues? O Yes O No B. If yes, what is it and where does it occur? Thank you for your cooperation. Please return this questionnaire in the enclosed self- addressed, stamped- envelope. Please complete all questions and return to the City of Edina by October 18, 2010. 3of3 Data Entered By: Last Date Data Entered: Due Date: Questionnaires Sent Out: Questionnaires Returned: Percent Returned: Data Checked By/Date: Susan Waack 27 MCCAULEY HEIGHTS STREET ..STRUCTION 2011 PROPERTY QUESTIONNAIRE BA-372 AP, _ -.jlX C 1 OF 1 S.—Rap 20 15% 50% 05% 20% 75% 5% 0% BS% 0% 95% 0% 35% 85% 15% 05% 0%' 100% 1e0% 235% 205% 185% 5% BS% G:1EnpineeMpVmgwemenLLleAJR McGUby He(1Ma Rewn (I011)1PRELIM OESIGMFFA51 &L1TWnfpmalbnal Meeth.pl5urvry TaWhlbn.vh 1/1]2011 15% GO% MINIM MINM== a��a�aooaa�o���o� ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®o ®®� ®® MEN lllllmm�a��a�a��a�a ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®®® ®® �a �a�a�aooaa�o� -moo 11311 111111101111 ME MINIM MININIM ��momaomoomom am ®momm ©mmom����om S.—Rap 20 15% 50% 05% 20% 75% 5% 0% BS% 0% 95% 0% 35% 85% 15% 05% 0%' 100% 1e0% 235% 205% 185% 5% BS% G:1EnpineeMpVmgwemenLLleAJR McGUby He(1Ma Rewn (I011)1PRELIM OESIGMFFA51 &L1TWnfpmalbnal Meeth.pl5urvry TaWhlbn.vh 1/1]2011 15% GO% PENDING ASSESSMENT ROLL MCCAULEY HEIGHTS IMPROVEMENTS BA -372 APPENDIX H 1 OF 1 STREET PID # LEGAL STREET OWNER LOT BLOCK ASSESSABLE REU ASSESSMENT COST NOTES McCauley Cir 0611621220009 6400 Curtis L Wchle & Rita J Teresi 1.00 $7,000.00 0611621220012 6401 William R Fleischmann & Linda C Perkowski 1.00 $7,000.00 0611621220042 6404 Stephen E Zivkovich 0.80 $5,600.00 0611621220013 6405 Peter & Joan L Calott 1.00 $7,000.00 0611621220041 6406 Robert A & Katherine 0 Venaglia 0.80 $5,600.00 0611621220047 6408 Mary Lou Funke 0.80 $5,600.00 0611621220014 6409 Douglas M & Debra R Fincham 1.00 $7,000.00 0611621220048 6410 Michael Schrom 0.80 $5,600.00 0611621220017 6411 David M & Stephanie B Nelson 1.00 $7,000.00 0611621220015 6412 Shahnawaz Punjawani 1.60 $11,200.00 0611621220016 6416 John J McCauley / Estate C!0 Kathleen Mccauley 1.00 $7,000.00 Different Mailing Address McCauley Ter 0611621220049 1 6437 Neil A Brasted & Mary I Holman 0.80 $5,600.00 0611621220050 6439 Josephine A Parker 0.80 $5,600.00 0611621220057 6443 Crown Bank 1.00 $7.000.00 Different Mailing Address - No Building 0611621230002 6445 Michael G & Bonnie A Smith 1.00 $7,000.00 0611621230039 6447 Betty McCauley 1.00 $7,000.00 0611621230046 6449 Elizabeth A Feinberg & Cynthia K Edwards 0.80 $5,600.00 0611621220029 6451 Betty Mccauley 1.00 $7,000.00 0611621220028 6453 Betty Mccauley 1.00 $7,000.00 No building on lots Post Ln 0611621220046 6301 Bruce A & Denise K Cooper 1.00 $7,000.00 0611621220045 6305 Robert A & Nancy E Coates 1.00 $7,000.00 0611621220044 6309 Michael R & Kathy Z Bloomquist 1.00 $7,000.00 0611621220021 6312 Monica C Flynn 1.00 $7,000.00 0611621220024 6313 Douglas E Happe 1.00 $7,000.00 0611621220020 6316 Allen & Betty S Cater 1.00 $7,000.00 0611621220023 6317 Bruce H & Carol A Baron 1.00 $7,000.00 0611621220056 6320 Robert L Naas 1.00 $7,000.00 NOTES: Total 26.20 $183,400.00 PRELIMINARY TOTAL ROADWAY COST 1 $ 183,400.00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT REU 26.20 AVERAGE COST PER REU $ 7,000.00 GAEngineering%lm dSSA372 McCauley Heights Recon (2011)1PRELIM DESIGMFEASIBILITYIBA -372 Pending Assessment Roll.>nsx If 1 ,rv91N�1r,,� o4e tA December 27, 2010 RE: McCauley Heights Neighborhood Reconstruction Project Dear Resident: APPENDIX D IOF3 City of Edina The City of Edina has initiated the process of roadway and utility improvements for the summer of 2011 for your neighborhood. As part of the public involvement process the City held an open house on September 20, 2010, to discuss a typical roadway reconstruction project. The next step is to hold an informational meeting to discuss the improvements more specific to your neighborhood. We are hosting a neighborhood informational meeting for the McCauley Heights Neighborhood Reconstruction Project on January 10, 2011, from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., at the new Public Works and Park Maintenance Facility, located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. The meeting will consist of a 20 minute presentation starting shortly after 7:00 pm that will cover such items as work to be done, preliminary project costs, estimated assessment, etc. followed by a short question and answer session. Please see the map on the back side of this letter for the preliminary project area. If you cannot attend the informational meeting the presentation can be made available to you after the meeting. Please contact the Engineering Department at 952 - 826 -0371. Sincerely, Jack D. Sullivan, P.E. Assistant City Engineer G- \Engineering \Improvements\BA372 McCauley Heights Recon (2011)\PRELIM DESIGN\FEASIBILITWnformational Meeting \20101227_BA372 Neighborhood_ Informatioal_Meeting_Letter.doc City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 -826 -0390 TTY 952 -826 -0379 APPENDIX D 20F3 December 27, 2010 RE: McCauley Heights Neighborhood Reconstruction Project Dear Resident: The City of Edina has initiated the process of roadway and utility improvements for the summer of 2011 for your neighborhood. As part of the public involvement process the City held an open house on September 20, 2010, to discuss a typical roadway reconstruction project. The next step is to hold an informational meeting to discuss the improvements more specific to your neighborhood. We are hosting a neighborhood informational meeting for the McCauley Heights Neighborhood Reconstruction Project on January 10, 2011, from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., at the new Public Works and Park Maintenance Facility, located at 7450. Metro Boulevard. The meeting will consist of a 20 minute presentation starting shortly after 7:00 pm that will cover such items as work to be done, preliminary project costs, estimated assessment, etc. followed by a short question and answer session. Please see the map on the back side of this letter for the preliminary project area. If you cannot attend the informational meeting the presentation can be made available to you after the meeting. Please contact the Engineering Department at 952 - 826 -0371. Sincerely, lack D. Sullivan, P.E. Assistant City Engineer G:\Engineering\lmprovements\BA372 McCauley Heights Recon (2011)\PRELIM DESIGN\FEASIBILITY\Informational Meeting\20101227_BA372_ Neighborhood _Informatioal_Meeting_Letter.doc APPENDIX D 3OF3 Project Area N ° e N McCauley Heights Street Reconstruction wE v d � 2Pt Ili Improvement No: BA -372 OctcbLq 0 0 INFORMATIONAL MEETING POWERPOINT PRESENTATION. City of Edina January 10, 2011 Neighborhood Informational Meeting McCauley Heights Roadway Improvements BA-372 TonvW=4 Input Opportunities PURPOSE OF MEETING IS TO INFORM AND TO GATHER PUBLIC INPUT FROM YOU • Use Post -It notes and place on map • Fill out comment cards • Tell us /Phone us • Write/Email us • Speak at Public Hearing HOLD ALL QUESTIONS UNTIL AFTER PRESENTATION Inonv e7 calM Agenda Introductions Reconstruction Video Typical Project Process Project Details • Existing Conditions • Plans • Preliminary Assessments Project Schedule APPENDIX E 1OF6 Q= e7 = Agenda , Introductions Reconstruction Video Typical Project Process Project Details • Existing Conditions • Plans • Preliminary Assessments Project Schedule °JU ouvsr ov �n Agenda Introductions Reconstruction Video Typical Project Process Project Details • Existing Conditions • Plans • Preliminary Assessments Project Schedule �uenv0.7�7a Typical Process Special Assessed Projects Chapter 429 of MN State Statute • Initiation of Improvement project by Council (staff) or by petition. • Public Open House to inform residents of project and to take comments and Input. • Ten days notice Is sent to affected property owners and legal notice is pplaced in paper (Edina Sun) prior to Public Caring. • Feasibility Report prepared by Professional Engineer and accepted by Council. 1 INFORMATIONAL MEETING POWERPOINT PRESENTATION Typical Process (continued) • Conduct Public Hearing to order the project. • Ordering of Improvement project requires a majority of Council if petitioned by residents (normally 3 of 5 Council votes if >36% signatures of assessed properties) or 4 of 6 Council votes If project is not initiated by residents (or lacking 35% signatures). • Levy of special assessments is typically held at i the completion of the projectthrough a Final Assessment Hearing. 01CMVQ.7 �p Typical Process Assessment Policy Neighborhood reconstruction: • Based on residential equivalentunit (REU) • Single family home is 1 REU • Duplex properties Is 0.8 or 1.6 REU's (Based on address of property). 11 06=m,Q91= Typical Process Assessment Policy Final assessment Hearing After Project Is Complete Special Assessment Payment: 1. Pay entire balance 2. Partial payment (26% minimum) 3. Spread payment over 10 years 4. Senior deferral APPENDIX E 20F6 Typical Process (continued) • All preliminary (estimates) until project Is completed at end of project. • Once City Council orders project, assessments become pending. • Final assessment are typically not more than 110% of pending assessment. • Typically assessments are lower than pending amount. Typical Process Assessment Policy Interest Rate: Typically 4.0% to 7.6% Based on 10 year Aaa bond rate plus 2% Payback Period:. up to 10 years Te"V ea 1.10 Agenda Introductions Reconstruction Video Typical Project Process Project Details • Existing Conditions • Plans • Preliminary Assessments Project Schedule INFORMAI'IONAL MEETING POWERPOINT PRESENTATION iscm or MMA Project �-- - Details ao an e ` w i 4WC"YOFEDINA Project Details Proposed Street Improvements: • Roadway width to remain approximately the same. • Spot repair on existing curb and utter. Y. s APPENDIX E 30F6 CITY Or EMMA Project Details i ' • Project initiated by City staff. • Street originally constructed mid 1970's. • Watermain constructed in late 1960's. • Normal maintenance performed on street. • Street pavement approaching end of useful life. • Typical life of street varies ( -35 years). • Storm water drainage issues. • Steel gas main and service pipes. flcrrroreofras Project Details rroposea street improvements: • B618 concrete curb and gutter along all streets withoutcurb and gutter. • Concrete driveway aprons. 3 INFORMATIONAL MEETING POWERPOINT PRESENTATION Project Details Issues 1 concerns we do know about: Varied driveway materials. • Cost of the project. Inconvenience (e.g. access, dust, noise, etc.) — v` I ' 11MYOFKOINA Project Details Proposed Utility Improvements: • New fire hydrants • Sanitary sewerspot repairs and replacement • Storm sewer upgrade CITY OI[OINA Project Details Assessments McCauley Heights $179,650 Special Assessed 26.2 REU's $7,000 per REU APPENDIX E 4OF6 Project Details Improvements do not include: Based on returned questionnaires • Sidewalks Sump drain Street lighting Project Details Ir o>: Roma _ Preliminary Assessments l ,i PPPPPP $7,000 •„' r1 LL4 ✓�� $11,000 --- =E Project Details Improvements do not include: Based on returned questionnaires • Sidewalks Sump drain Street lighting Project Details Ir o>: Roma _ Preliminary Assessments l LM $5,500 $7,000 •„' $11,000 --- =E INFORMATIONAL MEETING POWERPOINT PRESENTATION aCM OF mom Agenda Anticipated Introductions + Reconstruction Video i, Typical Project Process 2011 i Project Details Begin Construction .... ............................May • Existing Conditions + • Plans ................. • Preliminary Assessments Project Schedule j I cm ov eoiaA 1 Questions? 4 Comments?. l APPENDIX E 50F6 Ugomrov®rtu► Project Schedule, . Anticipated Open House Meeting ...................... Sept 20 2010 Informational Meeting ...................... Jan. 10, 2011 Feasibility Report.. .....' .....................Jan. 18, 2011( Y Public Hearing ........ .........................Feb. 1, 2011' + Bid Opening ............. ..........................April 2011 i Award Contract ......... ..........................April 20111 Begin Construction .... ............................May 2011 Complete Construction .......................:..Fall 2011, , Final Assessment Hearing ................. E APPENDIX E McCAULEY HEIGHTS 6 of 6 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATIONAL MEETING JANUARY 10, 2011 .,Oojp 00 ' f• APPENDIX F I OF 1 QUESTION / COMMENT CARD Lo .6 rk 1, A Inv imrin, Name 19 -5,ry Address (,v i V, � I -� 1-,, PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT APPENDIX G 1 OF 4 REPORURECOMMEN®ATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: II.J. From: Wayne Houle, PE ® Action Public Works Director/ F1 Discussion City Engineer Information Date: January 4, 2011 Subject: Resolution No. 2011 -09, Setting Public Hearing for Improvement Projects: 1. BA -371 Killarney Shores Street Reconstruction (02/1/2011) 2. BA -372 McCauley Heights Street Reconstruction (02/1/2011) 3. BA -373 Oscar Roberts Street Reconstruction (02/1/2011) ACTION REQUESTED: Approve attached Resolution No. 2011 -09, calling for Public Hearing on February 1, 2011 for Killarney Shores Street Improvements: No. BA -371, McCauley Heights Street Improvement: No. BA -372 and Oscar Roberts Street Improvement No. BA -373. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: City staff is requesting public hearings for three neighborhood street reconstruction projects. All projects are initiated by staff and have included an extensive public process. Feasibility reports for the three projects will be presented to Council prior to the public hearings. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2011 -09 G: \Engineering \Improvements \BA372 McCauley Heights Recon (2011) \PRELIM DESIGNTEASIBILIMPublic Hearing \Item II. J. Resolution No. 2011 -09 Setting Public Hearings for Improvement Projecis.docx RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -09 SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR FEBRUARY 1, 2011 FOR NEIGHBORHOOD STREET RECONSTRUCTION FOR: KILLARNEY SHORES, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -371 McCAULEY HEIGHTS, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -372 OSCAR ROBERTS, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -373 APPENDIX G 20F4 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, that a public hearing shall be held on the 1$1 day of February, 2011, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at 7:00 p.m. to consider street reconstruction in the neighborhoods of: • Killarney Shores, Improvement No. BA -371; • McCauley Heights, Improvement No. BA -372; • Oscar Roberts, Improvement No. BA -373. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law. Dated: January 4, 2011 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 4, 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 120 City Clerk APPENDIX G 3OF4 January 14, 2011 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -372 MCCAULEY HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS The Edina City Council will meet at Edina City Hall, on Tuesday, February 1, 2011, at 7:00 p.m., to consider the public hearing on roadway improvements for McCauley Heights Neighborhood. This hearing is being conducted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. This, hearing has been called as a recommendation from staff. The proposed project would be constructed in the summer of 2011 with the assessment hearing occurring in the fall of 2012. The estimated project cost is $183,400. The cost of the project will be funded by special assessment. The estimated cost per assessable lot is $7,000 per residential equivalent unit. The assessments can be divided over a ten -year period with interest accumulating on the unpaid balance. The area proposed to be assessed the cost of the proposed improvement includes the following: 6400 to 6416 McCauley Circle, 6437 to 6453 McCauley Terrace and 6301 to 6320 Post Lane. Your receipt of this notice is'an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties which are considered to be benefited by the improvement. The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing. APPENDIX G 4OF4 (OFFICIAL PUBLICATION) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING MCCAULEY HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -372 The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall on Tuesday, February 1, 2011, at 7:00 p.m. to consider the following proposed improvements to be constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. McCauley Heights Neighborhood Roadway Improvement Estimated Total Assessment Cost Improvement No. BA -372 $183,400 The area proposed to be assessed by the proposed improvements includes all properties between and including: 6400 to 6416 McCauley Circle, 6437 to 6453 McCauley Terrace and 6301 to 6320 Post Lane. These properties are proposed to be assessed at approximately $7,000 per residential equivalent unit. Debra Mangen City Clerk PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE EDINA SUN ON January 20 and 27, 2011. PLEASE SEND TWO (2) AFFIDAVITS OF PUBLICATION. BILL TO CITY OF EDINA. 158 NNINl IjIIIWO1100 62 ��► m 11111 to lop i7l 1 .11 ►,1.1..1 I I I �i 494 iVA 31 1581 OTIMlIIIIII&IMN 100 17 T 21 311 ,w91A\1 o e FEASIBILITY STUDY - BA 373 Cn ,o ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA OSCAR ROBERTS NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS JANUARY 18, 2011 LOCATION: The Project includes Bristol Circle, Cornelia Drive, Glouchester Drive and Heatherton Circle. The drawing below is a detailed project location map of Oscar Roberts Neighborhood Roadway Improvements (Figure 1). 7125 7124 7125 7116 7117 7116 7129 7128 7129 7120 7121 7120 7121 7120 7133 7132 7133 7124 7125 7124 7125 7124 7137 7136 7137 7128 7129 7 PROJECTLwm 7128 W 72ND ST �. ..... ». .... ..r...... ... .... 7201 ' 7200 7201 7200 7201 • 7200 70 7201 7200... 7201 7203 Wr 7205 7204 7205 7204 7205 7204 i° 7205 7204} 7205 I 7209 7207 7207 7207 7208 7108 7208 7209 7109 7210 7209 7213 i 7213 7212 7211 7212 "'••• 7217 , 7212 7213 7217 7216 7215 7221 ' 7216 7221 7217 7301 7220 7219 7225 7224 7221 7300 -10 7305 7224 7301 ° 7301 7300 ° 7303 7309 7300 7305 k 7305 7320 -30 7304 3 7313 7304 8 7309 x 7307 7308 7308 a 7309 7317 7313 7312 7311 7340 7312 7313 -_ 7321 7317 7316 7315 7360 73 7325 7316 7321 7317 7320 7329 7320 �1 7 7333 77324 00 ° N cM� ��Mpp CD ° M CV) M M 2 �7 Cl)j i 7337 + 7401 4100 -20 t740 3 ° ° m N 4250 .4 4 Project Area N e It Oscar Roberts Street Reconstruction W E /- s Improvement No: BA -373 EN.—N 0.P Figure 1. Proiect Area Map Feasibility Study Oscar Roberts Neighborhood Improvements No. BA -373 January 18, 2011 INITIATION & ISSUES: The Oscar Roberts Neighborhood project was initiated by the Engineering Department as part of the City's street reconstruction program. This project is identified in the Capital Improvement Program. This project addresses updating aging infrastructure including issues such as drainage problems, sanitary sewer problems and watermain improvements. Comprehensive Plan All Engineering projects are reviewed for compatibility with the City of Edina 2008 comprehensive Plan Update. Figure 7.10, Sidewalk Facilities and 7.11, Bicycle Facilities in the Appendix do not indicate any proposed sidewalk, paths or bicycle facilities within the project limits. Staff Issues The following are existing features and resident comments that present issues in determining the feasibility of the project and are addressed in this report: • Surface rainwater drainage and storm sewer issues • Poor condition of existing pavement • Existing landscaping, retaining walls, driveways, etc. • Sanitary sewer and watermain deficiencies • Existing mature trees • Existing lighting Resident Input The residents of the reconstruction area were invited to an Open House on September 20, 2010 to discuss the City's process for street reconstruction. This meeting was followed up with a questionnaire sent to the property owners on October 4, 2010. The questionnaires were completed and returned by 59 of the 80 property owners, a return rate of 74 %. The full questionnaire and responses can be found in the Appendix. The two key issues that were addressed in this questionnaire were the addition of new sidewalks and installation of decorative lighting. The responses to those questions are shown in Table 1. OSCAR ROBERTS IMPROVEMENT PROJECT — Results from October 4. 2010 Questionnaire Sheet Questionnaires Questionnaires Sidewalk Prefer New Change 9 a Existing Sent Returned Li tin Yes No Yes No 80 59 2 43 5 42 % of Returned Questionnaires 74% 3% * 73% * � $ /0 � 71 /o * Percentages are based on responses of returned questionnaires and may not equal 100% if questions were not answered on questionnaire Table 1. Results from Questionnaire Page 2 of 8 Feasibility Study Oscar Roberts Neighborhood Improvements No. BA -373 January 18, 2011 A neighborhood informational meeting was then held on January 12, 2011 to discuss the improvements planned for this neighborhood. The meeting was attended by 19 residents representing approximately 13 properties. EXISTING CONDITIONS: Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer The sanitary sewer was installed in 1971. There have been very few sewer blockages in this neighborhood. The trunk sanitary sewer mains were inspected using a televising system and the majority of the main lines were heavily rooted. Watermain The watermain was installed in 1971. There have been very few reports of trunk watermain and service pipe issues in this neighborhood. Storm Sewer The storm sewer in this neighborhood was installed in 1971. The project area is located within the legal boundary of Nine Mile Creek Watershed. There are a few areas of localized ponding that occurs near the curb lines. Private Utilities Providers of privately owned gas, electric, communications and cable television utilities are present in the neighborhood. All the utilities are overhead with the exception of cable television and gas lines. Street lighting consists of standard "traditional head" lights mounted on square wood poles that are scattered throughout the neighborhood. A few homeowners have front yard lights that help illuminate the street corridors. Streets The majority of the roadways in this neighborhood were originally constructed in the early 1970's. The neighborhood currently has curb and gutter and the widths are approximately 31 feet wide. The pavement condition varies throughout the neighborhood and is in relatively poor condition (Photos 1 & 2). The average Pavement Condition Index (PCI) for the City of Edina is 57 and the average PCI for Oscar Roberts is 16. Examples of the raveling and alligator cracking can be seen in photos 1 & 2. The City of Edina, with the help of a pavement consultant, reviews a third of the city's roadway every year. The streets are graded based on a number of conditions such as sagging, alligator cracking, raveling and potholes. Streets are rated on a scale from 0 to 100; with 0 being extremely poor and 100 representing a brand new road surface. It is the City's practice to complete a total reconstruction of the streets when the PCI is less than 45, a Mill and Overlay project when the PCI is between 45 and 65, and Seal Coats for PCI greater than 65 and less than 95. The pavement throughout these streets appears to be near the end of its useful life while the costs to maintain and repair the roadways are steadily increasing. Overlaying or seal coating the pavement is no longer feasible. Page 3 of 8 Feasibility Study Oscar Roberts Neighborhood Improvements No. BA -373 January 18, 2011 Landscaping Some property owners have placed boulders or other obstructions within the City right -of -way creating barriers along the roadway. These types of barriers and landscaping items are prohibited from being placed in the boulevard in accordance with Edina City Code 1200.02. Other typical items exist adjacent to the roadway such as retaining walls, concrete driveways, landscaping, shrubs, trees and fences. Photo 1. Existing Pavement Condition Page 4 of 8 Feasibility Study Oscar Roberts Neighborhood Improvements No. BA -373 January 18, 2011 Photo 2. Existing Pavement Condition PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: The Oscar Roberts Neighborhood project involves localized rehabilitation of the sanitary sewer, upgrades to the storm sewer system including sump drain, upgrade watermain and fire hydrants, spot repair on existing concrete curb and gutter, and reconstruction of bituminous pavement. Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer The sanitary sewer main was televised in the fall of 2010. After televising, staff evaluated the exiting main and found heavy roots and proposes some spot repair and Cured -in -Place -Pipe (CIPP) lining along Cornelia Drive, Glouchester Drive and Heatherton Circle to prevent future root intrusion. Watermain Watermain rehabilitation is proposed on segments within the project limits, include upgrading all hydrants Staff is also proposing to upgrade the watermain on Heatherton and Bristol Circle. Currently, a portion of the watermain on both Heatherton and Bristol Circle is 1.5" copper and proposing to upgrade the watermain to a 6" DIP. Storm Sewer Spot repairs will be made to the existing concrete curb and gutter that are no longer functioning properly Page 5 of 8 Feasibility Study Oscar Roberts Neighborhood Improvements No. BA -373 January 18, 2011 The storm sewer network will have modifications to improve existing drainage issues at various locations throughout the neighborhood. Some of the existing structures will be removed and replaced due to their poor condition. Installation of sump drains will be installed where feasible to allow the property owners to connect their sump pump discharges directly into the storm sewer system. Private Utilities Comcast, the local cable television, has indicated that they may upgrade or replace underground mains within the project limits. This work is not part of the City's project but will be coordinated to occur prior to our construction activities. CenterPoint Energy, local utility gas company, has minimal work and majority of work should be done in the boulevard. The other privately utility owners have expressed some interest in upgrading some of their networks within the project limits. Staff will continue to communicate with these private utility companies for any anticipated improvements. Streets The project will reconstruct the streets with a bituminous surface to the same width as today while maintaining the existing concrete curb and gutter. The proposed design acknowledges and addresses as many comments and concerns by residents of the neighborhood as possible while still maintaining the desired minimum standards of the engineering and public works staff. Residential Roadway Lighting and Sidewalks The questionnaire asked if residents wanted to add sidewalk or reconstruct the street lights in the project area. The results from Table 1 show that property owners do not want to add sidewalk or reconstruct the street lights within the project. Therefore, staff is not recommending these items be part of the project. RIGHT -OF -WAY & EASEMENTS: The right -of -way for this. neighborhood is 60 feet wide. All proposed improvements stay within this right -of -way and no additional easement requirements are anticipated. PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $846,200 (Table 2). The total cost includes direct costs for engineering, clerical and construction finance costs from start of project to final assessment hearing. Funding for the entire project will be from a combination of special assessment and utility funds. The estimated roadway construction cost is $421,200 and will be 100 percent funded by special assessments. The new concrete curb and gutter is included under the storm sewer fund not under the roadway special assessment. Utility Page 6 of 8 Feasibility Study Oscar Roberts Neighborhood Improvements No. BA -373 January 18, 2011 improvements and repairs amount to $425,000 and will be funded through the respective utility fund. Item Amount Total Cost Roadway: $ 421,200 Roadway Total: $ 421,200 Utilities: Storm Sewer $ 125,000 Watermain $ 100,000 Sanitary Sewer $ 200,000 Utility Total: $ 425,000 Total Project: $ 846,200 Table 2. Estimated Proiect Costs ASSESSMENTS: The assessments are based on the City's Special assessment policy, dated September 7, 2010. Based on this policy there are 81 residential equivalent units (REU). The estimated assessment per REU is $5,200.00. (Figure 2) Figure 2. Preliminary Assessment Map Page 7 of 8 Feasibility Study Oscar Roberts Neighborhood Improvements No. BA -373 January 18, 2011 PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint: Project Open House September 20, 2010 Neighborhood Informational Meeting January 12, 2011 Council Orders Public Hearing January 4, 2011 Receive Feasibility Report January 18, 2011 Public Hearing February 1, 2011 Bid Opening April 2011 Award Contract Spring 2011 Begin Construction Spring 2011 Complete Construction Fall 2011 Final Assessment Hearing Fall 2012 FEASIBILITY: Staff believes the construction of this project is necessary, cost effective and feasible to improve the public infrastructure in the Oscar Roberts Neighborhood. APPENDIX: A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. 1. Open House Meeting Letter and Presentation Property Owners Questionnaire Questionnaire Results Informational Meeting Letter Information Meeting PowerPoint Presentation and Attendance List Project comments and Letters Received Recommendation to Set Public Hearing, Notice of Public Hearing to residents, and Notice of Public Hearing Advertisement Preliminary Assessment Roll City Comprehensive Plan Update — Sidewalk and Bicycle Facilities (Fig. 7.10 and 7.11) Page 8 of 8 APPENDIX A 1 OF 5 September 7, 2010 RE: 2011 Street Reconstruction Projects Dear Resident: Last fall you were notified that the City of Edina initiated the process of roadway and utility improvements for your neighborhood for the summer of 2011. At the same time you were also invited to an open house to learn more about the process. Once again, you are invited to attend a similar informational meeting on Monday, September 20, 7:00 p.m., at the new Public Works and Park Maintenance Facility, located at 7450 Metro Boulevard, see attached map on back. The meeting will consist of a short presentation starting at 7:15 p.m. with question and answer to follow. The presentation will cover topics such as "How are streets selected for reconstruction; Who funds the project; Special Assessment; What can I expect during construction; How can I stay informed." The exact amount that you will be assessed for this project will not be available in time for the open house; however, based on past projects, you can expect the amount to be between $8,000 to $12,000. To prepare for the meeting, please review the enclosed brochure "A Guide to Edina's Street Reconstruction Process ". Also for additional information on our Reconstruction Process please go to our website at http:// www. CityOfEdina.com /FutureProjects. Please contact Assistant City Engineer, Jack Sullivan if you have any questions or if you are unable to attend and would like more information on the process. Jack can be reached at isullivan.@ci.edina.mn.us or 952 - 826 -0445. Sincerely, G�f/ iz0 Wayne D. Houle, P.E. Director of Public Works and City Engineer G:TEnginecringVnfrastructure \Streets \pavement management\Neighborhood Reconstruction Program \2011 and 2012 Street Recon\2011 Open House Letter.doc APPENDIX A 2OF5 W 70TH ST 1N 70TH ST � o J J Q > V J m z 0 J � W W 74TH ST O � New Public Works Building W 76TH ST EDINA INDUSTRIAL \_ W 77TH ST BLVD i ---------------- \ i City of Edina y ° "� "w New Public Works Building �d , 7450 Metro Blvd W N E Edina, MN 55439 s OPEN HOUSE for Neighborhood Roadway Improvements 2011 and 2012 1 TYPICAL TIMELINE FROM FIRST NOTIFICATION TO END OF CONSTRUCTION August Kick -olf Informational letter to residents Mid - September Open House (for preceding two years) Mid - October / November Neighborhood informational meeting - detaifed project plans and estimated cost are provided December / January Feasibility report and public hearing January / February / March Plan Preparation / Bidding April / May Construction starts October / November Construction finishes Spring Warranty work Summer / Fall Final Assessment Hearing 3 FUNDING Special Assessment pays 100% of the following (approximately $8,000 to $12,000 per Residential Equivalent Unit (REU): • Roadway — replacing entire roadbed • Sidewalks • Decorative Streetlights (optional) • Traffic Management (optional) 5 APPENDIX A 3of5 (� f> AGENDA Introductions Road Reconstruction Video Presentation 1. Process 2. Funding sources 3. Assessments 4. Communication with residents 5. What to expect during construction 6. What can I do to prepare for the project? Questions 10) PROCESS FROM START TO END END STMT Id' mod•• coune9 reieota project. project goes w the Goltom of 15 -ZO C year scheduk FUNDING The Utility Fund which covers sanitary sewer, storm sewer and water main pays 100% of the following: • Curb & Gutter Sanitary Sewer — trunk pipe only in the roadway Storm Sewer — trunk pipe in roadway and in easement on private property • Water main — trunk pipe in roadway up to the curb stop of private property Sump Pump Pipe — for residents to connect sump pumps N WHAT DO YOUR TAXES PAY FOR? The Portion of Your Property Tax that the City Receives 'iry of Edina 20°/ City of Edina so i Other Allocation Police Fire Parks Public Works Snowplowing Pothole Repairs Seal coating Other Street Maintenance r COMMUNICATING WITH YOU Our first contact with you Is when we inform you of the intormatianal meeting, followed by public hearings notification; WAIL c open house; surveys; project plans and schedules and onstruction update letters via regular mail. Our last communication to you is the notice of final special assessment hearing. Public hearings will be published in the Edina Sun - Current Questionnaires will be sent during the early planning stage to help stall formulate a decision in areas such as street lighting and style of street lighting. ® Weekly construction updates will be sent via the "City Extra" email. Stay in the loop by signing up for Ibis free service. Lagers may be delivered to inform you at lime - sensi tive --ft such as water shut-off the neat morning. s RESIDENT QUESTIONNAIRE a' y The property owners questionnaire generally gathers information on the following topics: Sump Pump Discharge Service Line — do you have one and the location? Residential Roadway Lighting — do you want decorative street lights, style and pole location? Pedestrian Issues — what are the issues and do you favor sidewalk? Private Underground Utilities — do you have underground lawn irrigation and pet containment? Local Drainage Problems — have you noticed drainage issues in the neighborhood? " APPENDIX A 4of5 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS - PAYMENT =dam' OPTIONS pay mlire Choessment g is held the tall altos oject is completed imes one year later). -I by Nov ao 010 $12, le — Payable Payable - to yava Final assessment amounis`� are determined atthattime, but cannot "'teed 10' of pendmg assessmen,/ HOW CAN YOU GIVE INPUT AND STAY ' INFORMED? • wvrw.CilyolEdina. cam Visit our website regularly. Information from open houses and other communications are archived on our website. • edinamail(jilu.edina —in Drop us an email • 952 - 826 -0371 Call us; office hours are 7:00 -3:30 p.m. • Slap by the office Public Works and Engineering Departments 7450 Metro Boulevard • Schedule an appointment 952.826 -0371 to BOULEVARD AREAS Property owner items located within the City's right of way may be damaged during construction: • Irrigation and pet containment systems will only be restored if indicated on the resident questionnaire. • Prior to construction, residents will be given an opportunity to remove plantings and other landscape features in the boulevard. • Boulevards will be restored with grass — regardless of previous planting or WHAT CAN YOU EXPECT DURING CONSTRUCTION? • That the City will keep you informed of activities • Private utility companies updating their systems prior to City's contractor • Dusty, noisy, muddy (watering trucks will help to keep dust down) • May be asked to limit water use • May be connected to temporary water M WHAT CAN YOU DO TO PREPARE FOR THE PROJECT? • Begin financial planning for the assessment • Coordinate landscaping, driveway replacement and house remodeling projects with the reconstruction schedule • Complete questionnaire to provide feedback • Ask questions; inform staff of your concerns • Sign -up for "City Extra" to receive updates via email notification APPENDIX A 5of5 WHAT CAN YOU EXPECT DURING CONSTRUCTION? • Irrigation system and pet containment may be damaged • May not be able to access your driveway for up to seven days • May not be able to access the roadway for a few hours • Contractor will accommodate special needs APPENDIX B 1 OF 6 October 4, 2010 RE: 2011 Oscar Roberts Street Reconstruction — Resident Questionnaire Dear Resident: You may have been notified for that your neighborhood was proposed to be reconstructed in 2012. The City of Edina has actually initiated the process of roadway and utility improvements. for 2011 for your neighborhood. The first step was to hold an open house on September 20, 2010, for you to become familiar with the process. Things to know and consider: • Residents pay a portion of the overall project cost in the form of a special assessment. A Typical special assessment ranges from $8,000 to $12,000 per Residential Equivalent Unit (REU) or, per property, and are payable over 10 years. The estimated special assessment for your neighborhood will not be determined until after information has been gathered from the questionnaires and a feasibility report is completed. You will not be billed for the special assessment until fall 2012. Components of a project vary and are based on questionnaire responses. The special assessment typically includes cost of new roadway, sidewalk and streetlights. Other utility upgrades such as water main, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and concrete curb and gutter are funded through the utility fund and are not special assessed. Construction typically starts in spring /early summer and end in late fall of the same year. The next step is.to get feedback from you regarding a number of key components of the project. The information you share with us is essential in determining certain aspects of the project that may be constructed. This information will be discussed at the.project information meeting (date yet to be determined). The following information explains the questionnaire that is enclosed. A map showing the boundaries of the area to be reconstructed is attached to the back of this letter. After reading this letter completely, please complete the questionnaire and return by October 18, 2010, in the self -' addressed stamped envelope. (. Drainage Service Connection Do you use a sump pump or have you considered installing one? Do you currently have a footing drain? The project could include a sump drain system along the roadway to collect groundwater, storm water runoff, and discharges from private sump pumps, roof drains or any other runoff from private property. APPENDIX B 2OF6 2011 Oscar Roberts Street Reconstruction — Resident Questionnaire Page 2 of 3 A typical sump pump discharges onto a homeowner's lawn. This can cause problems with your lawn, your neighbor's lawn, your basement if your lawn drains back to your home or with- the street if the sump pump constantly runs down the gutter line promoting algae growth. Discharging the sump pump into the sanitary sewer system such as floor drains or laundry tubs is against the law, both City Ordinance and State Statute. If the topography and final street designs favor a City sump drain system we will need to know if you currently have a sump pump or a footing drain. The line from the home to the City sump drain system would be your responsibility including any plumbing modifications needed to connect your sump pump. The City sump drain system is funded through the storm sewer utility fund. We also would like to know about any local drainage problems. This might be an opportunity for the sump drain system to correct these issues. II. Local Drainage Problems Does storm water run -off stand in the street or sidewalk in front of your house? As part of the storm sewer and sump drain design process,. we would like to know if this or similar situations are occurring in your area. If so, please describe it in the local drainage problems section of the questionnaire. We will review them for possible corrective action. III. Private Underground Utilities . Some residents install private underground utilities in the City owned boulevards, also called the right -of -way (ROW). These utilities are usually lawn irrigation or pet containment systems. Utility and roadway reconstruction can damage these utilities. If they are damaged, they will be restored only if you indicate that you have' these systems on your returned questionnaire in the private underground utilities section. Additionally if the contractor knows the location of these private utilities, they can attempt to avoid damaging them during construction. IV. Residential Streetlights As part of all reconstruction projects, staff typically asks if residents favor upgrading their streetlight system. In some cases, the streetlight system is at the end of its useful life and requires upgrading. We do not know yet the condition of your specific streetlight system; an evaluation will be done later on. Funding for streetlights are currently through special assessment. The typical cost is approximately $2,000 to. $3,000 per REU or, per property. In the. residential streetlight option section of the .questionnaire are examples of the different styles of streetlighting that could be installed in your neighborhood. Please rank your style preferences. Please note that ranking your style preferences does not mean you are in favor of streetlights. G: \Engineering \Improvements \BA373 Oscar Roberts Street Recon (2011) \PRELIM DES IGN\FEASIBILIMInformationat Meeting \BA -373 Survey_Letter.doc APPENDIX B 30F6 2011 Oscar Roberts Street Reconstruction — Resident Questionnaire Page 3 of 3 V. Pedestrian Issues As part of all reconstruction projects, staff typically asks if residents see a need to add sidewalks to the neighborhood. Funding for sidewalks is split between special assessment, City of Edina and the Edina School District (if the sidewalk falls within a school walking zone). The typical cost to add a couple blocks of sidewalks to a multi -block area is $300 -$600 per REU or, per property. If you know of a problem at a pedestrian crossing, missing sidewalk or other pedestrian issues please tell us about it in that section of the questionnaire. VI. Traffic Management The Edina Transportation Commission typically reviews traffic issues on local streets. We would like to know if you feel that your roadway has any traffic issues. Please tell us about it in the traffic management section of the questionnaire. Receive Project Updates via the City Extra If you sign up for our "City Extra" e-mail notification service, you will receive project updates as they occur. During feasibility study preparations, such updates are usually notifications of upcoming meetings. Later, if the Council chooses to proceed with construction of this project, the updates will occur weekly. During construction, the updates will include information Such as when access to your driveway might be limited or when to have your contractor repair your private lawn irrigation system if it was damaged by construction activities. The "City Extra" is our best form of communication with you. This service is free and allows individuals to sign up to receive e-mail messages from the City on a variety of topics. To sign up for the service go to the City Extra website at http : / /cityextra.cityofedina.com and place a check mark in the box next to this project's name, "Oscar Roberts Street Reconstruction" Please contact the City at 952 - 927 -8861 if you are having trouble signing up for City Extra. Questions If you have questions after reading this letter, please email me at isullivan(c�ci.edina.mn.us or call me at 952 - 826 -0445. Sincerely, Jack D. Sullivan, PE Assistant City Engineer Enclosed: Property Owner's Questionnaire Self- Addressed Stamped Envelope G: \Engineering\Improvements \BA373 Oscar Roberts Street Recon (2011) \PRELIM DESIGN \FEASIBILITY \Informational Meeting \BA -373 Survey_Letter.doc APPENDIX B 4OF6 October 4, 2010 A,r -lr ok e t4 PROPERTY OWNERS QUESTIONNAIRE 2011 OSCAR ROBERTS .�� STREET RECONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA Please do not answer these questions until after you have read the entire newsletter. Please complete and return this survey by October 18, 2010, using the self- addressed stamped - envelope. I. Drainage Service Connection: A. Does your home have a drain tile /footing drain? O Yes O No OUnknown B. Does your home have a sump pump? O Yes O No OUnknown C. Would you be willing to connect your sump pump O Yes O No up to a City drain if provided (at your own cost)? D. Would you be willing to connect your roof drains O Yes O No up to a City drain if provided (at your own cost)? Please sketch in the space to the right: your house, garage, driveway, sump pump discharge location and approximately where along the right -of —way (ROW) line you would like the service connection pipe located. LINE HOUSE EXAMPLE GARAGE HOUSE SERVICE X CONNECTION `AJ PIPE HERE ROW ----- ------ - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - -- URB LM1E II. Local Drainage Problems — please list specific surface water drainage problems in your neighborhood: III. Private Underground Utilities A. Do you have an underground lawn irrigation system in the City's right -of -way? (Typically the right -of -way is 10' to 15' behind the roadway.) O Yes O No B. Do you have an underground electric pet containment system in the City's right -of -way? C71 Yes O No 1 of 3 APPENDIX B 5OF6 October 4, 2010 IV. Residential Streetlights: A. Do you favor upgrading your streetlights (there is a special assessment cost of approximately $2,000 to $3,000 per REU)? Cl Yes n �. B. If the streetlights are upgraded, which style do you prefer? Please rank all the styles from 1 to 5, with 5 being most liked. Please answer even if you answered "No" in section IV. A. Acorn: Coach: Style can be viewed along Concord Ave Style can be viewed in the Sunnyslope from Valley View Rd to South View Ln, neighborhood, just north of Edina City Edina. Hall, Edina. v Dislike O O O 0 Cl Like 1 2 3 4 5 Arlington Lantern: Style can be viewed in the Country Club neighborhood, just north of West 501h St along Wooddale Ave, Edina. Dislike O O O O O Like 1 2 3 4 5 V. Pedestrian Issues: Dislike D C1 0 0 0 Like 1 2 3 4 5 Round Lantern: Style can be viewed at County Road 109 and W 78th St North, Maple Grove. Dislike 0 0 0 O O Like 1 2 3 4 5 A. Knowing that residents pay a portion of sidewalk costs in Edina, do you see a need to add new sidewalks in your neighborhood? B. If Yes, Where? O Yes O No 2 of 3 APPENDIX B 6OF6 October 4, 2010 C. Please list specific neighborhood pedestrian issues below. VI. Traffic Management A. Do you feel your neighborhood or roadway has any traffic issues? O Yes O No B. If yes, what is it and where does it occur? Thank you for your cooperation. Please return this questionnaire in the enclosed self- addressed, stamped - envelope. Please complete all questions and return to the City of Edina by October 18, 2010. 3 of 3 APPENDIX D 1 OF 2 December 27, 2010 RE: Oscar Roberts Neighborhood Reconstruction Project Dear Resident: The City of Edina has initiated the process of roadway and utility improvements for the summer of 2011 for your neighborhood. As part of the public involvement process the City held an open house on September 20, 2010, to discuss a typical roadway reconstruction project. The next step is to hold an informational meeting to discuss the improvements more specific to your neighborhood. We are hosting a neighborhood informational meeting for the Oscar Roberts Neighborhood Reconstruction Project on January 12, 2011, from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., at the new Public Works and Park Maintenance Facility, located at 7450 Metro Boulevard. The meeting will consist of a 20 minute presentation starting shortly after 7:00 pm that will cover such items as work to be done, preliminary project costs, estimated assessment, etc. followed by a short question and answer session. Please see the map on the back side of this letter for the preliminary project area. If you cannot attend the informational meeting the presentation can be made available to you after the meeting. Please contact the Engineering Department at 952 - 826 -0371. Sincerely, ck D. Sullivan, P.E. Assistant City Engineer G .\Engineering\lmprovements\BA373 Oscar Roberts Street Recon (201 I)TRELIM DESIGN\FEASIBILITYUnformational Meeting120101227_BA373_ Neighborhood_ Informatioal_Meeting_Letter.doc APPENDIX D 20F2 W 72ND 3T ■ wuuu�ru�uuuu ■uuurrruurururwrrruuuruauuru uuarrr u� 7201 7200 7125 7124 7200 7125 7116 ■ rrrrrrrr ■u■ ■ ■r ■r■rr • 7117 7121 7116 7120 7121 7120 7124 7125 7124 7 PROJECT LIMITS 7128 2 7129 7128 7129 7120 440 7204 " 7133 7132 7133 7124 7125 7137 7136 7137 7128 7129 W 72ND 3T ■ wuuu�ru�uuuu ■uuurrruurururwrrruuuruauuru uuarrr u� 7201 7200 7201 7200 7201 7200 0 7201 7200 ■ rrrrrrrr ■u■ ■ ■r ■r■rr • •• •• 7217 2 h 7205 7204 7205 7204 05 7204 " 7205 7204 7209 07 L7209 7208 7207 7215 7213 7208 7221 7209 7208 7208 7209 1,10 7401 7403 0 00 10 („ °,N411 N r o r � a 4100 -20 o 4250 � \201 0 7212 7205 7207 7209 7300 -10 Project Area N Oscar Roberts Neighborhood W + E Improvement No: BA -373 Engineering Dept - -- - - -- — October. 2010 - 7213 7212 7211 ■ rrrrrrrr ■u■ ■ ■r ■r■rr • •• •• 7217 2 7213 7217 7216 7215 7221 8 [7220 7217 7221 7220 7301 7219 7225 7221 7224 7305 7224 7301 7301 7300 c 7303 7309 7300 5 7305 W 1 7320 -30 7304 .7305. 7313 7304 - 0 7309 0 7307 1 7308 7309 7317 7308 7313 7311 F7340 7312 7312 7313 7321 7317 7316 7315 7350 -60 7325 7318 7317 7320 7321 7320 319 7329 7333 7324 - 7 = 7337 N N V) M ti CO O CV • i M r • r•r prr on. a o ■ u ■ 7401 7403 0 00 10 („ °,N411 N r o r � a 4100 -20 o 4250 � \201 0 7212 7205 7207 7209 7300 -10 Project Area N Oscar Roberts Neighborhood W + E Improvement No: BA -373 Engineering Dept - -- - - -- — October. 2010 J INFORMATIONAL MEETING POWERPOINT PRESENTATION City of Edina January 12, 2011 Neighborhood Informational Meeting Oscar Roberts Roadway Improvements BA-373 omror®MA Input Opportunities PURPOSE OF EEEnNG IS TO INFORM AND TO GATHER PUBLIC INPUT` FROM YOU • Use Post -It notes and place on map • Fill out comment cards • Tell us/Phone us • WritelEmail us • Speak at Public Hearing HOLD ALL QUESTIONS UNTIL AFTER PRESENTATION omr of ®mA Agenda Introductions Reconstruction Video Typical Project Process Project Details • Existing Conditions • Plans • Preliminary Assessments Project Schedule APPENDIX E 1 OF 6 1 cm or EMM Agenda Introductions Reconstruction Video Typical Project Process Project Details • Existing Conditions • Plans • Preliminary Assessments Project Schedule MY OF MNA Agenda Introductions Reconstruction Video Typical Project Process Project Details • Existing Conditions • Plans • Preliminary Assessments Project Schedule ■CITY OF EO,NA Typical Process Special Assessed Proje, Chapter 428 of MN State Statute • Initiation of improvement project by Council (staff) or by petition. • Public Open House to inform residents of project and to take comments and Input. • Ten days notice is sent to affected property owners and legal notice Is pplaced In paper (Edina Sun) prior to PublicHearing. • Feasibility Report prepared by Professional Engineer and accepted by Council. 1 INFORMATIONAL MEETING POWERPOINT PRESENTATION e� e7 Typical Process (continued) • Conduct Public Hearing to order the project • Ordering of improvement project requires a majority of Council if petitioned by residents (normally 3 of 6 Council votes If >35% signatures of assessed properties) or 4 of 6 Council votes if project Is not Initiated by residents (or lacking 35% signatures). • Levy of special assessments is typically held at l the completion of the project through a Final Assessment Hearing. 10017Y67COM Typical Process Assessment Policy Neighborhood reconstruction: • Based on residential equivalent unit (REU) • Single family home is 1 REU • Duplex properties is 0.8 or 1.6 REU's (Based on address of property). JW1�e7M= Typical Process U Assessment Policy Final assessment Hearing After Project is Complete Special Assessment Payment: 1. Pay entire balance 2. Partial payment (25% minimum) 3. Spread payment over 10 years 4. Senior deferral APPENDIX E 2OF6 �JCrWVe7ca= Typical Process (continued) • All preliminary (estimates) until project is completed at end of project. • Once City Council orders project, assessments become pending. • Final assessment are typically not more than 110% of pending assessment. • Typically assessments are lower than pending amount. �f ;CA4V U7 �+•+n Typical Process JUUAssessment Policy Interest Rate: Typically 4.0% to 7.6% Based on 10 year Aaa bond rate plus 2% Payback Period: up to 10 years env a7= Agenda Introductions Reconstruction Video Typical Project Process Project Details • Existing Conditions • Plans • Preliminary Assessments Project Schedule 2 INFORMATIONAL MEETING POWERPOINT PRESENTATION CrrY Of MHA �.. •o •� �.. v, Project Details _ r •- �' A �� �, w a. !!! ! ! ' � .+a - H CITY Or MINA Project Details • Neighborhood currently has concrete curb and gutter • Majority of street width 31 -ft Project Details Proposed Street Improvements: • Spot repair on existing curb and gutter. • Blacktop thickness increased. .. gym...— APPENDIX E 30F6 ITrQa.,:,;,, Project Details • Project initiated by City staff. • Street originally constructed early 1970's. • Watermain constructed in early 1970's. • Normal maintenance performed on street. • Street pavement approaching end of useful life. Typical life of street varies ( -35 years). • Storm water drainage Issues. Project Details Issues / concerns we do know about: • Storm water drainage issues. Landscaping placed in boulevard. • Irrigation systems & pet containment fences T ----F> *CITY OFWINA Project Details Issues 1 concerns we do know about: • Varied driveway materials. • Cost of the project. • Inconvenience (e.g. access, dust, noise, etc.) J I INFORMATIONAL MEETING POWERPOINT PRESENTATION Project Details j I CITY Of lOINA Project Details Improvements do not include: Based on returned questionnaires • No sidewalks • No changes to street lighting Project Details Assessments Oscar Roberts $415,000 Special Assessed 81 REU's $5,200 per REU APPENDIX E 4OF6 OW OFMWA Project Details Proposed Utility Improvements: • New fire hydrants • Upgrade 1.5" watermain on Heatherton Circle & Bristol Circle Sanitary sewerspot repairs and replacement • Resident sewer improvements • Storm sewer upgrades _. I ;, Project Details Assessments • Assessment History • Estimated Project Assessments Cm OF coINA Preliminary Assessments = $4,100 $5,200 $8,200 Project Details INFORMATIONAL MEETING POWERPOINT PRESENTATION APPENDIX E 50F6 CffVGPaMMA Project Schedule Anticluated Sehaffilla Open House Meeting .......................Sept. 20, 2010) 1 Informational Meeting ....................... Jan. 12,2011'., Receive Feasibility Report ................ Jan. 18, 2011' Public Hearing ................................. Feb. 11, 2011 Bid Opening ............. ..........................April 2011! Award Contract ......... ..........................April 2011' Begin Construction .... ............................May 2011 Complete Construction ....................... ;.-.Fall 2011 Final Assessment Hearing ................. 5 1i IdMY OF aDm Agenda Introductions Reconstruction Video Typical Project Process Project Details • Existing Conditions • Plans • Preliminary Assessments Project Schedule APPENDIX E 50F6 CffVGPaMMA Project Schedule Anticluated Sehaffilla Open House Meeting .......................Sept. 20, 2010) 1 Informational Meeting ....................... Jan. 12,2011'., Receive Feasibility Report ................ Jan. 18, 2011' Public Hearing ................................. Feb. 11, 2011 Bid Opening ............. ..........................April 2011! Award Contract ......... ..........................April 2011' Begin Construction .... ............................May 2011 Complete Construction ....................... ;.-.Fall 2011 Final Assessment Hearing ................. 5 OSCAR ROBERTS APPENDIX E 60F6 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATIONAL MEETING JANUARY 12, 2011 NAME ADDRESS 2 (0 MAn= r (.oRNEl,1�4- -01tiv� 3 CEL-00 4 �:/G�r l�4Tlj �GelzaLak. 73l4 Cs,ini /i..� jar. 5 721 a-p- IxY. 6 4hro UTA �. 7 7z1� �lo�cld� 8 9 ?aZ16 10 '? ch 11 kN 1 N 2 X311 lddGKC -St6-C De 1, < 13 4/A,/,%fr L-4,ovp 7317 14 1 a/ `c- ? 7 t r . 15 1 TA6--ljjc� L- 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Karen K. Hill APPENDIX F 1 OF 2 2465 Birch Forest Road SW Nisswa, MN 56468 billing address 7332 Cornelia Drive Edina, MN 55435p� work address Ott To: Wayne Houle, ti O go Public Works /City Engineer Edina Subject: Street Reconstruction Projects in Cornelia Drive Area Please send all information to my billing address to include the current brochure and break down. of information as it occurs. I will not be. available to attend.meetings this Fall due to Volunteer Teaching at a Methodist Mission School in NM. During much of the time I'am working out. of the area computer availability is limited'requiring= to request hard copies from your office for forwarding purposes. At this point I do not have any details related to the project, but do have some general comments. They are as follows: Sidewalks: Already exist on main traffic roads (70m 8t 72n� Only walkers on neighborhood.roads are dog walkers who do NOT need sidewalks Young children do not walk in the neighborhood Merely stand at bus stops Neighbors and Mail Personnel walk across grass using most direct route and/or drive between locations Would create problems with sprinkler systems Movement would be required in many cases or water wasted on. sidewalks This would cause residents added costs during this economic time (Edina and neighbors don't seem to share my philosophy of dormant lawns when there is not natural water.) Roads: I have only noted 2 holes both related to the sewer system Both were filled when reported Financial Costs: Added burden during this economy Would affect.the sale of homes during this economy I have noticed houses in our neighborhood constantly being on the market and would hurt individuals trying to sell in the near future Page 1 of 1 Mr. Sullivan, Sorry I cannot attend the meeting January 12th at the Public Works Facility as I am in Louisville KY training Fire Rescue classes. I have had training classes with Edina Fire Rescue over the years as well. I have been a resident of Edina since 1980 and am a self employed as an "S" corp since 2000. 1 have been struggling with a decline in classes over the past two years as city budgets all over the country have tightened and struggling with my house payment as well. I have recently had a home loan modification approved and if my house payment goes up because of the "Oscar Roberts Neighborhood Reconstruction Project" I will be forced to sell. I know most all residents in the area disapprove of the construction and have petitioned against the project. The streets are fine. Why is this being forced on us? Sincerel. c OAIRE, Inc 7312 Cornelia D ive Edina, MN 55435 612 - 963 -1691 Monday, January 03, 2011 AOL: Blysholm D M M N Z 00. T x N T Jack Sullivan From: Darla Paulson <djpaulson005 @gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 1:55 PM To:. Jack Sullivan Cc: Wayne Houle; Gaylord Paulson; maggie russel; Hein deHoog; Susan deHoog Subject: 2011 Oscar Roberts Street Reconstruction Thank you, Jack, for hosting the neighborhood informational meeting last night re the above. Would you please forward this e -mail to the appropriate persons in the Edina city offices: My husband and I attended Jack Sullivan's informational meeting last night re the above reconstruction project. We were out of town during September's meeting and were happy to receive up -to -date information. Previous to last night we had received letters dated September 2, 2009 and October 4, 2010 from the City indicating costs to us in the amount of $8,000 to $15,000 for an assessment of a new roadway, sidewalk and streetlights. After last night's meeting, it was obvious these letters were not case specific to the Glouchester Drive project, but we were unaware of that prior to last night. We were relieved to hear our assessment would be about $5,200 - substantially less than we had expected. A couple of months ago a gentleman (name unknown) from our neighborhood knocked on our door with a petition re delaying the project. Since we relied on data from the two letters and from the gentleman; we signed the petition. Since last night, we have. left a message for the petition originator to delete our names. However, in the event the message does not get to him, we would appreciate it if the person at the City who receives this petition take our names off it. After talking with- several neighbors last night, we believe many neighborhood home - owners will want to delete their names from the petition, now that we have accurate information on the project. Thank you. Darla (Vashro) and Gaylord Paulson 7212 Glouchester Dr. Edina, MN 55435 952 - 832 -0140 APPENDIX G 1 OF 4 REPORURECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: II.J. From: Wayne Houle, PE ® Action Public Works Director/ F] Discussion City Engineer Information Date: January 4, 2011 Subject: Resolution No. 2011 -09, Setting Public Hearing for Improvement Projects: 1. BA-371 Killarney Shores Street Reconstruction (02/1/2011) 2. BA -372 McCauley Heights Street Reconstruction (02/1/2011) 3. BA -373 Oscar Roberts Street Reconstruction (02/1/2011) ACTION REQUESTED: Approve attached Resolution No. 2011 -09, calling for Public Hearing on February 1, 2011 for Killarney Shores Street Improvements: No. BA -371, McCauley Heights Street Improvement: No. BA -372 and Oscar Roberts Street Improvement: No. BA -373. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: City staff is requesting public hearings for three neighborhood street reconstruction projects. All projects are initiated by staff and have included an extensive public process. Feasibility reports for the three projects will be presented to Council prior to the public hearings. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2011 -09 G: \Engineering \Improvements \BA372 McCauley Heights Recon (2011) \PRELIM DESIGN \FEASIBILITY\Public Hearing\Item 11. J. Resolution No. 2011 -09 Setting Public Hearings for Improvement Projects.docx RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -09 SET PUBLIC HEARING FOR FEBRUARY 1, 2011 FOR NEIGHBORHOOD STREET RECONSTRUCTION FOR: KILLARNEY SHORES, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -371 McCAULEY HEIGHTS, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -372 OSCAR ROBERTS, IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -373 APPENDIX G 20F4 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, that a public hearing shall be held on the 1st day of February, 2011, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at 7:00 p.m. to consider street reconstruction in the neighborhoods of: • Killarney Shores, Improvement No. BA -371; • McCauley Heights, Improvement No. BA -372; • Oscar Roberts, Improvement No. BA -373. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law. Dated: January 4, 2011 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 4, 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.: WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk APPENDIX G 30F4 January 14, 2011 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -373 OSCAR ROBERTS NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS The Edina City Council will meet at Edina City Hall, on Tuesday, February 1, 2011, at 7:00 p.m., to consider the .public hearing on roadway improvements for Oscar Roberts Neighborhood. This hearing is being conducted• under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. This hearing has been called as a recommendation from staff. The proposed project would be constructed in the summer of 2011 with the assessment hearing occurring in the fall of 2012. The estimated project cost is $421,200. The cost of the project will be funded by special assessment. The estimated cost per assessable lot is $5,200 per residential equivalent unit. The assessments can be divided over a ten -year period with interest accumulating on the unpaid balance. The area proposed to be assessed the cost of the proposed improvement includes the following: 7200 To 7212 Bristol Circle, 7200 to 7340 Cornelia Drive, 7200 to 7323 Glouchester Drive and 7200 to 7208 Heatherton Circle. Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties which are considered to be benefited by the improvement. The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of . the hearing. APPENDIX G 4OF4 (OFFICIAL PUBLICATION) CITY OF EDINA 4801 W 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING OSCAR ROBERTS NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -373 The Edina City Council will meet at the Edina City Hall on Tuesday, February 1, 2011, at 7:00 p.m. to consider the following proposed improvements to be constructed under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. Oscar Roberts Neighborhood Roadway Improvement Estimated Total Assessment Cost Improvement No. BA -373 $421,200 The area proposed to be assessed by the proposed improvements includes all properties between and including: 7200 To 7212 Bristol Circle, 7200 to 7340 Cornelia Drive, 7200 to 7323 Glouchester Drive and 7200 to 7208 Heatherton Circle. These properties are proposed to be assessed at approximately $5,200 per residential equivalent unit. Debra Mangen City Clerk PLEASE PUBLISH IN THE EDINA SUN ON January 20 and 27, 2011. PLEASE SEND TWO (2) AFFIDAVITS OF PUBLICATION. BILL TO CITY OF EDINA. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1E 1c 2C 21 22 23 24 21 2E 27 2E 2E 3C 31 32 3' 34 3' 3E 31 3E 3s 4C 41 4' 4' 4< 4 4 4 4 4 5 51 5 PENDING ASSESSMENT ROLL OSCAR ROBERTS IMPROVEMENTS BA -373 APPENDIX H 1 OF 2 STREET P PID # L LEGAL STREET O OWNER A L L L S ASSESSABLE A ASSESSMENT NOTES Bristol Circle 310282414000 7 7200 J Jon W & Janet Hall 1 1.00 $ $5,200.00 310282414001 7 7201 B Bruce F & Cathleen Campbell 1 1.00 $ $5,200.00 310282414003 7 7203 M Marjorie A Thoenen 0 0.80 $ $4,160.00 310282414000 7 7204 S Stephen G & Rozanne M Andersen 1 1.00 $ $5,200.00 310282414003 7 7205 S Stephen H Brown 0 0.80 $ $4,160.00 310282414002 7 7206 J John C Thomas 0 0.80 $ $4,160.00 310282414002 7 7208 C CarolA Hughes 0 0.80 $ $4,160.00 310282414003 7 7207 -09 F Francis A Feist 1 1.60 8 8 320.00 D Duplex 310282414002 7 7210 J Jeanne A Toia 0 0.80 $ $4,160.00 D Different mailing address 310282414002 7 7212 H Hon Li & Danzhu Guo 0 0.80 $ $4,160.00 D Different mailing address Cornelia Dr 3102824130001 7 7200 M Michael R Nelson & Susan M Lehar 1 1.00 $ $5,200.00 3102824130031 7 7201 J James R & Linda M Du 1 1.00 $ $5,200.00 310282413000 7 7204 C Charles W & Cythia M Lewensten 1 1.00 $ $5,200.00 310282413003 7 7205 J Jeffrey A & Barbara J Gustafson 1 1.00 $ $5,200.00 310282413000 7 7208 C Carlos M Lo era & Line M Alzate 1 1.00 $ $5,200.00 310282413003 7 7209 S Stanley J & Margaret A Korfenowski 1 1.00 $ $5,200.00 31028241300 7 7212 D Dennis J & Linda J Dietzler 1 1.00 $ $6,200.00 31028241300 7 7213 J Jon R & Christine C Demers Victorsen 1 1.00 5 5,200.00 310282413000 7 7216 J John D & Ma E Dolejsi 1 1.00 $ $5,200.00 310282413003 7 7217 M Mavis Knudson 1 1.00 $ $5,200.00 31028241300 7 7220 E Ellen J Kennedy 1 1.00 $ $5,200.00 310282413003 7 7221 J Jeff C & Charlotte A Seymour 1 1.00 $ $5,200.00 310282413000 7 7224 S Stephen B & Janet E Barrett 1 1.00 $ $5,200.00 310282413003 7 7225 A Alex P & Marilyn M Sace 1 1.00 $ $5,200.00 310282413000 7 7300 R Robert H & Gail M Wtta 1 1.00 $ $5,200.00 310282413003 7 7301 G Gary M & Be J Dalasta 1 1.00 $ $5,200.00 310282413000 7 7304 D David A & Susan L Drexler 1 1.00 $ $5,200.00 310282413003 7 7305 K Kevin A 8 Lou Ann M Oak 1 1.00 $ $5,200.00 310282413001 7 7308 S Steven M & Jean F Bonneville 1 1.00 $ $6,200.00 310282413004 7 7309 J John S & Kayla M Wright 1 1.00 $ $5,200.00 310282413001 7 7312 R Robert L sholm Jr 1 1.00 $ $5,200.00 310282413004 7 7313 D David S Hartman & Maureen Fitzgerald 1 1.00 $ $5,200.00 310282413001 7 7316 J John & Ruth Pechacek 1 1.00 $ $6,200.00 310282413004 7 7317 U Uday Lohani & Romy Silwal 1 1.00 $ $5.200.00 310282413001 7 7320 J Jeffrey G Jonswold 1 1.00 $ $5,200.00 310282413004 7 7321 L Ladislaus & Melody Sledz 1 1.00 $ $5,200.00 310282413001 7 7324 R Roger D & Fredericka M Holm ren 1 1.00 $ $5,200.00 310282413012 7 7326 A Aaron Clarke 0 0.80 $ $4,160.00 310282413012 7 7328 D Dan W Brad 0 0.80 $ $4,160.00 D Different mailing address 310282413011 7 7330 P Philip E Hoop III 0 0.80 $ $4,160.00 310282413011 7 7332 K Karen K Hill 0 0.80 $ $4.160.00 D Different mailing address 310282413001 7 7334 -36 S Subba & Triveni Is Rau 1 1.60 $ $8,320.00 D Duplex 310282413012 7 7338 A A James & Nancy Bailey 0 0.80 $ $4,160.00 D Different mailing address 310282413012 7 7340 R Ray L Stidger 0 0.80 $ $4,160.00 Glouchester Dr 53 310282413002 7215.17 Ludovicus J 8 Stan M K Dehoo 1.60 8 320.00 Duplex 54 310282413005 7216 Dennis M & P ; _iussell 1.00 5 200.00 G:1Eng�neenngllm ,19A3730 -Raba S- R- (201 1)%PREUM OESIGMPEASIBIUTYMA- 373 Pentling Asussment Roll A= loft 55 56 57 58 59 6C 61 6 "e 62 64 6E 6E 67 6E 6E 7E 7' 7: 7: PEN" ASSESSM 201-1- OSCAR ROBERTS IMPROVEMENTS BA -373 AP- ')IX H IF 2 STREET PID # LEGAL STREET OWNER LOT BLOCK ASSESSABLE REU ASSESSMENT COST NOTES 310282413002 7219 -21 William G Merrill Jr 1.60 $8,320.00 Different mailing address, Duplex 3102824130051 7220 Timothy J & Erica J Austrums 1.00 $5,200.00 310282413005 7224 Richard & Marilyn Cornelius 1.00 $5,200.00 3102824130041 7300 Robert A & Darcy Schnitzer 1.00 $5,200.00 310282413002 7301 -03 Bruce L Lang 1.60 $8.320.00 1 Different mailing address. Duplex 310282413004 7304 Steven D & Nancy E Chergosky 1.00 310282413011 7305 Re hunathan Srinivasan & Mindula Ra hunathan 0.80 310282413011 7307 Jeffre & Patricia Shideman 0.80 ic 310282413004 7308 John R & Lisa M Carlson 1.00 310282413002 7309 -11 Robert H & Yvonne G Leslie 1.60 $8,320.00 Duplex 310282413004 7312 Manish Virmani & Bhavnoor Lambe 1.00 $5,200.00 310282413012 7313 U ender K Nazir & Santa Kachroo 0.80 $4,160.00 310282413012 7315 Harvey L & Barbara L Turner 0.80 $4,160.00 310282413004 7316 Paul R & Joyce V Gutkowski 1.00 $5,200.00 l 310282413012 7317 Frederick M & Virginia Wheriand 0.80 $4,160.00 I 310282413012 7319 Frederick M Wheriand 0.80 $4,160.00 Different mailing address 310282413004 7320 Shicai Zhu & Oin Dong 1.00 $5,200.00 3102824130121 7321 Sveeana Shubinsky 0.80 $4,160.00 s 3102824130121 7323 Kimball C & Dorothy K Cummings 0.80 $4,160.00 Heatherton Cir I 310282414000 7200 Gregory R & Carol L Richardson 1.00 $5,200.00 i 310282414000 7201 Alan J & Cynthia J Bank 1.00 5,200.00 Different mailing address i 310282414000 7204 Bimla & Ama 'it S Brar 1.00 5,200.00 310282414000 7205 Thomas J Miller & Gail M Weber 1.00 $5,200.00 3 310282414002 7206 F Hugh & Mollie A She 0.80 $4,160.00 3 310282414000 7207 -09 David & Susan Drexler 1.60 $8,320.00 Duplex 310282414002 7208 William & Sharon Coyne 0.80 $4,160.00 NOTES: total 81.00 $421,200.00 PRELIMINARY TOTAL ROADWAY COS 421 200.00 TOTAL ASSESSMENT REU 81.00 AVERAGE COST PER REU $ 5,200.00 G lEng— rhgI1mprove - .IBA373 Guar Roberts Street R,— (2011) \PRELIM DESIGMFEASIBILIMBA -373 Pending Assessment Roll xlsx 2 of 2 158 A MI0W,�LL',111-�110 .A ,111111 �� 494 17 31 m1p- iR 158NOWN MEXI1ii��I100 62 494 17 21 3l 04 � FEASIBILITY STUDY - BA 383 Cn �o ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT HKMT6V • CITY OF EDINA STREET IMPROVEMENTS W 44TH STREET — 13ROOKSIDE TERRACE to FRANCE AVENUE January 18, 2011 LOCATION: The project is located along West 44" Street from Brookside Terrace to County Road 17 (France Avenue) as shown in Figure 1 below. The roadway extends within the cities of Edina and St. Louis Park. INITIATION & ISSUES: Comprehensive Plan This area, identified as a street reconstruction project, is part of the City's 2011 to 2015 Capital Improvements Plan. A determination was made in the Pavement Management Plan that the roadway has reached a point whereby maintenance of the roadway through overlays and crack sealing is no longer cost effective and pavement rehabilitation is needed. Since the roadway extends with the City limits of Edina and St. Louis Park, a joint powers agreement will be drafted to identify the project responsibilities and funding between the two cities. Feasibility Study . W 44T" STREET — BROOKSIDE TERRACE to FRANCE.AVENUE . Staff Identified Issues The following issues were identified by staff during the preliminary scoping of the project: . • Poor condition of existing pavement Deteriorating curb & gutter, sidewalks, and concrete driveway aprons • Skewed intersection at Browndale Avenue and 44 th Street • Constraints regarding the existing landscaping and structures • The. desire to minimize impacts to trees and preservation of the, historic catalpa trees, elm trees; and other trees that line the roadway •. Drainage and surface water treatment.issues • Parking constraints • Lack of bicycle accommodations • Pedestrian access issues • . Sanitary sewer and watermain deficiencies. Resident Input A street reconstruction informational letter was distributed on October 15, 2010 to 98 property owners that are adjacent to' the. proposed street . reconstruction area from Mackey Avenue to . France Avenue. An informational meeting was held at the Public Works and Park. Maintenance Facility on October 28, 2010. • A presentation was given explaining the street reconstruction process and described the existing .Conditiions of the roadway, corridor as well as the design criteria for the roadway given that it is a designated Municipal State Aid roadway. The meeting was attended by 38 residents representing 32 properties. Input from this meeting and comments received are included in the Appendix. This meeting was followed up with a questionnaire sent to the property owners on November 16, ,2010. The questionnaire was distributed to ascertain whether the resident had drainage problems, private underground facilities, pedestrian issues, traffic, management .issues, and a preference regarding residential streetlights and the level of. importance for on- street parking. A return rate of 57 %, or 60 of the 106 residents, responded to the questionnaire. A tabulation of the responses has been completed and can be found in the Appendix along with the questionnaire. _. _ Page 2 of 21 Feasibility Study W 44T" STREET — BROOKSIDE TERRACE to FRANCE AVENUE Below is a summary of a few key questionnaire responses:. rercentages are based on responses or returned questionnaires and may not equal 100% if questions were not answered. The key issues that . residents felt needed to be addressed were local drainage issues, traffic management or speed control, parking, and pedestrian access issues. A second neighborhood meeting was held on December 8, 2010 to discuss the results of the questionnaire,.'the preliminary project design, and the estimated assessments to properties. The meeting was attended 'by 31 residents representing 27 properties. Input from this meeting and comments received have been included in the Appendix. EXISTING CONDITIONS: Roadway W 44th Street between Brookside Terrace and Mackey Avenue was last constructed in 1984 and consists of a two -lane roadway with a street width that varies between 28 to 36 feet. The.curb & gutter and sidewalk are in fair to good condition and the bituminous pavement is in fair condition. Parking is restricted on both sides of the roadway, from TH 100 to Brookside Terrace. W 44th 'Street between Mackey Avenue to France Avenue was last constructed in segments between the 1940's and 1950's. The roadway consists of a 26 to 40 -foot, two -lane roadway with no parking restrictions on either side except on the north side of W 44th Street between Eton Place and France Avenue, where a two -hour parking limit is currently in- place. Page 3 of 21 Residential Traffic On- Street Street Lights Management Parking Surveys Surveys Favor Upgrading Neighborhood g Importance of on Sent Returned Street Traffic street Parking* Lights* Issues? Important =5 Yes No Yes No to Not Imp6rtan1=1 106 60 25 33 48 12 2.3 % Of Returned 57% 42% 55% 80% 20 %0. 98% Surveys rercentages are based on responses or returned questionnaires and may not equal 100% if questions were not answered. The key issues that . residents felt needed to be addressed were local drainage issues, traffic management or speed control, parking, and pedestrian access issues. A second neighborhood meeting was held on December 8, 2010 to discuss the results of the questionnaire,.'the preliminary project design, and the estimated assessments to properties. The meeting was attended 'by 31 residents representing 27 properties. Input from this meeting and comments received have been included in the Appendix. EXISTING CONDITIONS: Roadway W 44th Street between Brookside Terrace and Mackey Avenue was last constructed in 1984 and consists of a two -lane roadway with a street width that varies between 28 to 36 feet. The.curb & gutter and sidewalk are in fair to good condition and the bituminous pavement is in fair condition. Parking is restricted on both sides of the roadway, from TH 100 to Brookside Terrace. W 44th 'Street between Mackey Avenue to France Avenue was last constructed in segments between the 1940's and 1950's. The roadway consists of a 26 to 40 -foot, two -lane roadway with no parking restrictions on either side except on the north side of W 44th Street between Eton Place and France Avenue, where a two -hour parking limit is currently in- place. Page 3 of 21 Feasibility Study W 44T" STREET - BROOKSIDE TERRACE to FRANCE AVENUE The existing road widths are as follows: . • Brookside Terrace to North Avenue - 26' wide • -North Avenue to Mackey Avenue = 36' wide: Mackey Avenue to Browndale Avenue — varies fro_ m 27' to 29' wide •' -Browndale Avenue to Wooddale Avenue— varies from 26 to 32' wide • ' : Wooddale Avenue to Curve Avenue — .varies from 29' to 30'. Curve Avenue to east of Eton Place 35' wide • East of Eton Place to France Avenue — 40' wide The existing right of way varies between 50 and 66 feet wide. The curb & gutter, sidewalk, and bituminous roadway are generally in poor condition. Segments of the sidewalk are structurally deteriorating, are trip hazards, and are less than the minimum City standard width of 5 feet. In addition, the sidewalk from Thielen Avenue to Browndale Avenue and segments near France Avenue are located adjacent to the curb lines with no boulevard. W 44th 'Street between Wooddale Avenue, and Glen Place is within the City limits of St. Louis Park. The roadway.totals approximately 700.feet in this area. A geotechnical evaluation report for the corridor was completed and indicates that the soil conditions of the roadway consist of sandy loams and sandy clay loams with minimal aggregate base under the pavement. The roadway includes the following typical characteristics: • The roadway varies in width from block to block and is not consistent throughout the length. • Curb & gutter is not present for certain segments between Mackey Avenue to Wooddale Avenue. • Mature and historic trees (catalpa, elm, etc.) line the boulevards and, in certain areas, are directly behind the edge of the roadway or curb. • :The roadway has a speed limit of 30 mph-as dictated by State Statute. • Parking is allowed on both sides with one exception - the north side of 44th Street between Eton Place and France Avenue, where a two -hour parking limit is currently in- place. Parking is also restricted on. both sides of the roadway between TH 100 to Brookside Terrace. • Pedestrian curb ramps, sidewalks, and boulevard widths do not meet the City safety standards and the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Page 4 of 21 Feasibility Study W 44T" STREET — BROOKSIDE TERRACE to FRANCE AVENUE The following photos illustrate the existing conditions. Photo 1 — Browndale Avenue Intersection (skewed intersection) Photo 2 — Historic Catalpa Trees (Dart Ave. to Browndale Ave.) Photo 3 — Kojetin Park (no pedestrian crossing and parking) Page 5 of 21 Feasibility Study W 44TH STREET — BROOKSIDE TERRACE to FRANCE AVENUE Photo 4 — +Pavement Condition (cracked and settled) Photo 6 — Curb Settlement Photo 7 — Non - existent Boulevard (pedestrian hazard) Page 6 of 21 Feasibility Study W 44T" STREET - BROOKSIDE TERRACE to FRANCE AVENUE Municipal State Aid Street W 44" Street from Brookside Avenue to. France Avenue is a Municipal State Aid Street (MSA)' and is eligible to receive funding through the State gas tax. The ,purpose of this fund is to help local governments' construct and maintain collector and. arterial roadways. The .State Aid office of Mn /DOT has established clearly defined design requirements for MSA streets. Bicvcle Accommodations According to the City of Edina's Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan, W 44th Street is currently a favored street for connection and movement to destinations outside of Edina and has been designated as a primary route for cyclists. The primary goal of the Bicycle Transportation Plan is to provide a safe and convenient bicycle transportation network. The report recommends that in the short and medium term, the City sign the bicycle route, repair curb pavement joints, remove certain areas of on- street parking, and provide striping of bicycle lanes. Edina Public Utilities The City of Edina owns and maintains public utilities between Brookside Terrace and TH 100 and between Wo.oddale Avenue and France Avenue as described below: Sanitary Sewer: The . trunk sanitary . sewer system is currently being . . evaluated and it is planned to televise the system to determine whether it is in satisfactory condition. The sanitary system along W 44th Street consists of 9- inch diameter clay pipe. Manhole inspections have been completed for the corridor. Historical records indicated that there have not been any sewer backups or blockages in the area. Watermain: The existing watermain is a 6 -inch unlined, cast iron pipe. The City has experienced, relatively few watermain breaks or service calls for the area. The hydrants. in the area are not standard City hydrants. Storm Sewer: In general, west of Brook Avenue, storm water runoff is channeled along curb & gutter and road edges where it is captured in storm sewer catch basins and routed into Minnehaha Creek. East of Wooddale Avenue, storm water runoff is directed into an existing storm sewer system along W 44th Street which outlets into a small drainage pond south of the .44th Street Dental Office Building. Currently, the pond is functioning as a dry basin with no outlet to the pond. Localized standing water has been identified at the intersections' of W 44th Street and Thielen Avenue, Coolidge Avenue, and Dart Avenue. These problems occur because the .existing storm sewer system is 'not adequate and in some areas the pavement and. curb lines have settled causing depressions or catch pockets of water. Page 7 of 21 The City of St. Louis Park owns and maintains public utilities between TH 100. and Wooddale Avenue as described below: Sanitary Sewer: The trunk sanitary .sewer system is, currently . being evaluated to determine whether the system is in satisfactory condition. The sanitary sewer system along W 44th Street exists between Glen Place and Browndale Avenue and consists of 9 -inch clay pipe. Watermain:. The existing watermain ;is a 6 -inch unlined cast iron pipe. The City has experienced relatively few watermain breaks or service calls for the area with the exception of a watermain break at Browndale Avenue. Storm Sewer: Storm water runoff between Coolidge Avenue and Dart Avenue is routed through the existing storm sewer to an existing outfall that-is located in a drainage utility easement between the rear yards of House Nos. 4508 and 4504. The storm sewer .outlets to 'an existing pond located in . Browndale Park. The majority of the area drainage issues is due to the lack of curb & gutter between Browndale Avenue and Wooddale Avenue. Over time, storm water runoff has eroded the pavement subgrade and pavement edges to form settled pavement, depressions, and potholes. Private Utilities Private utilities .extend within the roadway rights of way and consist of overhead electric and cable, and underground gas, telephone, cable, and fiber optics. Street lighting consists of a mixture of light styles including standard "cobra head" lights and other overhead lights mounted on wood poles. Based on the surveys and comments made during the informational meetings, the amount of lighting varies across the project. Landscaping Some property owners have placed boulders or other obstructions within City right of way creating hazards along the roadway. These types of hazards and landscaping items are prohibited from being placed in the boulevard in accordance with Edina City Code 1200.02. Other typical items exist adjacent to the roadway such as retaining walls, decorative pavement driveways, landscaping, shrubs, trees, and fences. ,.PROPOSED Roadway IMPROVEMENTS: The roadway between Brookside Terrace and Mackey Avenue is proposed to be milled and overlaid with a 2 -inch bituminous section. The pavement surface is in relatively fair .condition and a mill and overlay is the most cost - effective maintenance treatment at this time. From Mackey Avenue to France Avenue, the pavement section is proposed to be completely reconstructed to the subgrade. In general, the roadway Page 8 of 21 Feasibility Study W 44TH STREET — BROOKSIDE TERRACE to FRANCE AVENUE width is proposed to match the existing widths. The proposed widths will vary along segments of the roadway throughout the corridor because of the constraints related to minimizing impacts to the trees. The proposed alignment and widths of the roadway will be designed to provide consistency and continuity along the corridor given the existing constraints and the need to minimize impacts. The existing and proposed street widths can be seen on Figure 2. Figure 2 — Existing and Proposed Street Widths The curb & gutter is proposed to be replaced where deteriorated or where storm sewer is proposed to be installed. New curb & gutter is proposed to be constructed where it does not exist between Mackey Avenue to Wooddale Avenue. All driveway approaches will be reconstructed with the City standard driveway apron section. On- street Parking Several factors were considered when determining locations for on- street parking. These factors include: • MSA design standards • Existing street widths • Resident input • Sidewalk locations for access • Existing side street locations that allow parking • Number of properties on north vs. south side of roadway that would utilize parking • Lot depths • Existing parking locations Figure 3 shows the proposed typical sections for the various segments on the roadway along with where parking is proposed to be allowed. Page 9 of 21 Feasibility Study W 44TH STREET — BROOKSIDE TERRACE to FRANCE AVENUE No Parking Either; Side., Varies 2'- Y 5' 1'- 5' _ 11' 11' Varies ] [Walk Blvd Thru Lane Thru Lane Blvd 26'- 28' Section Proposed Typical Section Brookside Terrace to Browndale Avenue Dart Avenue to Woodale Avenue Parking on One Side Only Varies 0'- 2' 5'-1- l'- 5' 8' 11' 1' Varies Walk Blvd Parking Thru Lane Thru lane Blvd - -- - - t_I 30' - 32' Section Proposed Typical Section Browndale Avenue to Dart Avenue Wooddale Avenue to Curve Avenue Parking allowed on both sides 5' 1'- 5' • 8.5' 11' 11' • 8.5' 1'- 5' 5'- 10' Walk Blvd Parking I Thru Lane Thru Lane I Parking Blvd Walk 35' Section Proposed Typical Section Eton Place to just West of France Avenue Kojetin Park Figure 3 — Proposed Typical Sections Figure 9 shows the entire proposed improvements for the project area. Page 10 of 21 Feasibility Study W 44TH STREET — BROOKSIDE TERRACE to FRANCE AVENUE Mn /DOT Variance In order to provide parking on the roadway, a variance will be requested from the MSA design standards in locations where the proposed street widths do not meet standards. A minimum 32 -foot street with is required to accommodate parking on one side of the roadway and a minimum 38 -foot width is required to accommodate parking on both sides of the roadway. Parking in not proposed on either side of W 44�' Street between Brookside Terrace and Browndale Avenue due to the narrowness of the existing street, location of side streets for parking and input from the residents. Between Dart Avenue and Wooddale Avenue, the roadway is very narrow and lined with large trees. Widening of the roadway in this section is not recommended due to the impacts of the trees, therefore parking is not proposed in this area. Between Browndale Avenue and Dart Avenue and between Wooddale Avenue and Curve Avenue, it is proposed to reconstruct the roadway to a 30 to 32 -foot width. This area will match the existing roadway width with parking restricted to one side of the roadway. This will require a variance request of 2 -feet for the shoulder on the non - parking side of the roadway where the roadway is proposed to be 30 -feet wide. It is also proposed to reconstruct the roadway from Eton place to France Avenue at its existing width of 35 feet, with parking on both sides of the roadway. This will require a variance request of 1.5 feet for each parking lane for a total of 3 feet. Staff received input from residents regarding the effectiveness of the existing two -hour parking restrictions in this area and is evaluating options to address this problem. Figure 4 identifies the areas where a variance is proposed to be requested. - i R1 Aidawc Page 11 of 21 Feasibility Study W 44T" STREET — BROOKSIDE TERRACE to FRANCE AVENUE Figure 4 — Proposed Variance Areas Staff plans to submit a variance request to MnDOT. The next variance meeting will be held in March. A resolution will be included in the staff report for the February 1, 2011 public hearing requesting the variance. If the variance is not approved, staff will regroup with the residents to review the options to move forward with the project. Traffic Management/Traffic Calming Techniques The existing average daily traffic volume for the corridor is 3,620 vehicles. The average speed over the last 5 years along the corridor was 31.5 mph based on City - collected data. The posted speed limit is 30 mph. Several residents commented on the high speeds along the roadway. While enforcement is critical in addressing speeding issues, traffic calming techniques, as listed below, were incorporated in the project design. • Narrow (11 -foot) driving lanes • Pedestrian crossing and "bumpouts" at Kojetin Park • Additional boulevard trees • Intersection improvements at Browndale Avenue • Lane striping • Improve location /visibility of signage • Crosswalks at intersections In addition, lane designations at the intersection of France Avenue are proposed as shown on Figure 5 and were recommended in the Northeast Page 12 of 21 Feasibility Study W 44T" STREET — BROOKSIDE TERRACE to FRANCE AVENUE Edina Transportation Study. These improvements include providing lane striping for a dedicated left turn lane and a thru -right turn lane at the east and westbound approaches to France Avenue. The striping modifications will result in a loss of three parking spaces on each side of W 44th Street on the west side of France Avenue. Modifications to the signal system will need to be incorporated with the project to accommodate the proposed lane designations. The City of Minneapolis would be responsible for the lane striping and will be requested to contribute a share of the signal modifications for the westbound approach. Figure 5 — France Avenue Intersection It is proposed to install landscaping improvements along the sidewalk at the northwest corner of W 44th Street and France Avenue. This will provide separation for pedestrians and aesthetic improvements as the sidewalk is relatively wide in that area. Kojetin Park Access: A mid -block pedestrian crossing ("bumpout ") for Kojetin Park is proposed to provide improved access to the park from the existing sidewalk along the north side of W 44th Street. This crossing was identified in the Northeast Edina Transportation Study. Parking bays are proposed on the south side of the roadway within the Park property, accommodating approximately five spaces. The parking bays and crossing will allow for the roadway to be narrowed at the crossing with the intent to encourage drivers to slow down between Wooddale Avenue and Grimes Avenue, which was a concern for many residents in that area. The pedestrian crossing will be clearly delineated with an inlayed plastic material that sits just below the top of the pavement surface. Figure 6 below illustrates the proposed parking and pedestrian improvements at Kojetin Park. Page 13 of 21 Feasibility Study W 44T" STREET — BROOKSIDE TERRACE to FRANCE AVENUE I A " 71 .x �t Figure 6 — Kojetin Park (parking and pedestrian improvements) Bicycle Accommodations The average daily bicycle count on W 44'h Street based on City - collected data was approximately 26 bicyclists. Bicycle accommodations are proposed utilizing a bicycle symbol ( "sharrow "). The City of Minneapolis has implemented this type of bicycle symbol on Bryant Avenue and has had success with this type of application. A dedicated, separate bike lane cannot be provided within the roadway due to the narrowness and constraints with widening the roadway. Therefore, the "sharrow" would be placed within the through lane and share the road signs would be proposed to be installed. Figure 7 below is visual concept of the before and after constructed roadway and bike accommodations. Figure 8 shows a detail of the proposed striping and signage. Figure 7 — Before and After Bike Accommodations Page 14 of 21 Feasibility Study W 44T" STREET — BROOKSIDE TERRACE to FRANCE AVENUE a B' Parking 11' Lane 11' Lane Figure 8 — Bike Lane Details Edina Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer: City staff is currently evaluating the sanitary sewer pipe system. Manhole repair work has been identified and is proposed to be completed with the project. Watermain: Based on the City's Comprehensive Water Management Plan, the 6 -inch watermain between Grimes and Wooddale will need to be upsized to provide for fire protection flows in the neighborhood. In order to upsize the line, the watermain is proposed to be "burst" with a new 8 -inch HDPE watermain. Water services within this area will be replaced from the main in the street to the property line, where the curb stop will be replaced. A temporary water system will be in place during this work. In order to provide for future emergency management of the water distribution system, an interconnecting pipe to St. Louis Park's watermain at Wooddale Avenue will be provided to ensure that if the City was to have a water supply problem, they could "quick" connect to an adjacent City's watermain to provide for a temporary water distribution and vice versa. Hydrants within the project area will be replaced with City standard hydrants. Storm Sewer: The existing storm sewer is proposed to be replaced to meet the capacity needs based on the City of Edina's Stormwater Management Plan and MSA standards. Additional storm sewer piping and catch basins will address the drainage issues within the roadway. The localized depressions and settled curb lines will be improved as part of the street reconstruction. New storm pipe is proposed to be constructed from Coolidge Avenue to Dart Avenue to convey the runoff from the low area at Coolidge Avenue. Storm water treatment structures are proposed to treat storm water runoff form the project area prior to discharging to the pond at Browndale Park and the pond behind the dentist office. In addition, sump pump drains and foundation and roof drain lines will be accommodated with the storm sewer system for residents that identified this in the questionnaires that were submitted for the project. Page 15 of 21 Feasibility Study W 44TH STREET - BROOKSIDE TERRACE to FRANCE AVENUE St. Louis Park Public Utilities Sanitary Sewer: City of St: Louis Park staff is currently evaluating? -the sanitary sewer system to be.included with the project: Watermain: City of. St. Louis Park staff is currently evaluating the watermain system to be included with the project. Storm Sewer: The existing storm sewer is proposed to be replaced to, meet . the capacity needs based on the City of St. •Louis Park's Stormwater Management Plan and MSA standards. The localized depressions and settled pavement area will be improved as part of the street reconstruction. City staff is evaluating the outfall located between House No. 4508 and 4504, west of Glen Place as it may be in need of repair. Other Improvements . In addition to the proposed improvement discussed above several .other improvements are being proposed with the project. These include: Sidewalks: Segments of the sidewalk will be replaced where they are structurally deteriorating or are trip hazards (more than a 1 -inch settlement).. The sidewalk will be widened to the City minimum standard width of 5 -feet in areas where it does not currently meet that standard. Where the sidewalk is located adjacent to the curb with no boulevard present, it is .proposed. to replace the sidewalk with the City standard 1 to 2 -foot concrete exposed aggregate buffer. This buffer will provide separation from the street in order to promote safety throughout the corridor. All sidewalks that are .replaced will be constructed generally at the same location as they are today. Exceptions to this are: where the sidewalk wraps -around the backside of a tree located at House No. 4504, west of Browndale Avenue; where the sidewalk is proposed to be widened to allow for a 5 -foot wide.pathway and minimum of 1 =foot wide boulevard; and along Wooddale Avenue, south of W 44th Street to 'provide a consistent boulevard width. It is also proposed to extend sidewalks on either side of Mackey Avenue from where.they currently terminate, north.to the intersection at W 44th Street. All pedestrian crossings will be marked with in -laid pavement brick patterned pavement markings similar to other new crossings in the City of Edina. Pedestrian 'Curb Ramps: All of the pedestrian curb ramps will be reconstructed to meet the current design standards as dictated by MSA and ADA. Private Utilities: It is anticipated that CenterPoint Energy will need to relocate their lines as they are currently within the roadway. The new gas main will most likely be relocated to the north side of the roadway under the sidewalk. The new gas main will be directional drilled with minimal open excavations. Xcel Energy was contacted to obtain estimated costs to bury the existing overhead lines and individual services. Xcel estimated this cost to be Page 16 of 21 Feasibility Study W 44TH STREET — BROOKSIDE TERRACE to FRANCE AVENUE between $6,000 and $8,000 per property. The cost would be 100% directly funded by the property owners if requested. Other minor adjustments may be required to the existing private utilities prior to and or during construction. Street Lighting: A slight majority of the residents that returned the questionnaire were not in favor of adding decorative lighting. Xcel Energy has indicated that they will upgrade the current street lights with the "cobra cutoff' light style to provide improved direction of lighting. A; i j t LEGEND Nb ! L- Proposal Roadway Reconstru000n _ Proposed MAI 8 Overlay _ Proposed Paring Lane 4 Proposed Curo 8 GuM, Drivewacement a w Proposed ay ConcrReplete SxiewalN Replarement LEGEND Proposed Roadway Rtn:onswcaon Proposed Mill 8 Overlay — Proposod Pe—g Lene Proposed Curo & Gutter Dnveway Repacement Q Propoaad Cantxah Sidewalk Replacement 3 r F11 A Page 17 of 21 Feasibility Study W 44TH STREET — BROOKSIDE TERRACE to FRANCE AVENUE r r%1�, t --r— LEGEND - w��_�` - -- - s +• fir.. � ^�T�• ' °/- - �� r Proposed Roadway Reconsoucbon Proposed W11 & Ow day _ Proposed Pam 'N Lana _ Proposed Curb & Gutter i Dnveway Replacement '& �^ • - • fie' a Proposed Concete Sidewalk Replacement eta `smear. LEGEND Proposal Roadway Rewmtructw of Proposer) Mill 8 Overlay ' F ! ► 7. Proposed P.. Lane Prpposad Curb d Gutter !., ®Dnveway Replarssmant Proposed Concrete Sktewalk Replaoamenl Tim- AOL i ! ,ter f OWN tY1 k- fly.. �% � �� � � •. Yrl � ..i..��r s ®# LEGEND Proposed Roadway RecaruWCOOn _ Proposed Mill 6 Overlay Proposed Parkap Lana Proposed Curb 6 Gutter + Dmeway Replacement J -- Proposed Concrete Sgewalk RBDlacemenl - Page 18 of 21 Feasibility Study W 44T" STREET — BROOKSIDE TERRACE to FRANCE AVENUE u r LEGEND Proposed Roadway Reconswctwn jj Proposed Mdl& Overlay " •i� Proposed Prk L aing ana Proposed Curt & Griner Dnveway Replacement Proposed Cmuele Sidewalk Replace l r -,r . r '�a , OV V� Figure 9 - Proposed Project Layout RIGHT OF WAY & EASEMENTS: No additional right of way and /or easements will be required from adjacent property. PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $2,600,900. The total estimated cost includes a 10% construction contingency and 22% for engineering, administration, and financing. Funding for the entire project will be through a combination of special assessments and Municipal State Aid funds. A breakdown of costs is outlined in the table on the following page. Page 19 of 21 Feasibility Study W 44T" STREET — BROOKSIDE TERRACE to FRANCE AVENUE Estimated Project Costs ' Total Project City of City of Item Costs City of Edina St. Louis Park Minneapolis Mill &Overlay _________ _ $106,000 __ __$106,000_______ $0____ ____$0____ Reconstruction ------------- - - - - -- $987,300 --- - - - - - - -- $856,000 ---------------------------------- $127,000 $4,300 Utility Impvements _ _ _ _ _ - ro- - - -- - _ $789,000 _ - -- - - $690000 _ _ __ _ - -- - - __ _ - -- $99000 - -- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ $0 - - Traffic Signals ------- __ ___$50,000___ __ $50_000___ $0 Contingency (11% $195,500 $172,000 $23,000 $500 Total Construction Cost $2,127,800 $1,874,000 $249,000 $4,800 Indirect Costs (22 %) $4731100 $417,000 $55,000 $1,100 Total Project Cost $2,600,900 $2,291,000 $304,000 $5,900 ASSESSMENTS: City of Edina Assessments A special assessment of $230,000 or approximately $2,151 per REU is proposed for this project for properties within the City of Edina. The assessments will be levied against the benefitting adjacent properties, see attached preliminary assessment role in the Appendix. The methodology used for these assessments are based on the City Council adopted State Aid Assessment Policy, see Appendix. Per the policy, assessments will be levied based on a Residential Equivalent Unit (REU) from a total of 20% of the street construction project cost (excluding curb & gutter and all utility work) with the remaining 80% being funded through Municipal State Aid (monies appropriated through the gas tax fund). The methodologies for calculating the REUs for properties other than one REU are described below: Park Property: Koietin Park: 9 REUs = Layout of park property with similar size lots in neighborhood: (9 lots total) / (1 potential access) Residential Corner Lots: 4393 Mackey Ave, 4392 Brook Ave, 4750 Brooke Ave, 4390 Coolidge Ave, 4315 Eton PI 0.33 REU = (1 unit) x (1/3 side yard) Residential Duplexes: 4005, 4001, 3945 West 44'h Street: 1.6 REU = (2 units) x (0.8 from chart in the appendix) Page 20 of 21 Feasibility Study W 44TH STREET — BROOKSIDE TERRACE to FRANCE AVENUE Commercial Properties: 3919 West 44th Street: 5.44 REU = (3,624 sf / 1000 sf) x (1.5 from chart) / (1 accesses) X (1 access on W 44" St) 3925 West 44th Street: 3.32 REU = (2,215 sf / 1000 sf) x (1.5 from chart) / (3 accesses) X (3 accesses on W 44th St) 4386 France Avenue: 10.68 REU = (10,683 sf / 1000 sf) x (1.5 from chart) / (3 accesses) X (2 accesses on W 44th St) 4400 France Avenue: 3.00 REU = (4005 sf / 1000 sf) x (1.5 from chart) / (2 accesses) X (1 access on W 44th St) A map showing the preliminary assessable units is included in the Appendix. City of St. Louis Park Assessments Based on the City of St. Louis Park's special assessment policy, residents will not be assessed if Municipal State Aid funds are granted for the project. Since the project is proposed to be funded through Municipal State Aid, given that the variance is approved, no assessments are planned for St. Louis Park residents. If the variance is not approved and a decision is made to continue moving forward with the project, then the City of St. Louis Park would specially assess the benefitting properties in accordance with the City's special assessment policy. FEASIBILITY: The proposed improvements as outlined in this study are found to be necessary, cost effective, and feasible from an engineering standpoint. PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an engineering standpoint: . City Council orders the Public Hearing ................ ............................... December 28, 2010 Feasibility Report accepted by City Council ............ ............................... January 18, 2011 City Council Conducts Public hearing and Orders Project ...................... February 1, 2011 Variancehearing ............................................................ ............................... March 2011 City Council and Mn /DOT approve Plans and Specifications ............................ May, 2011 Receivebids ...................................................................... ............................... May, 2011 Awardcontract ................................................................. ............................... June, 2011 Beginconstruction ............................................................ ............................... June, 2011 Completeconstruction ........................................................ ............................... Fall, 2011 Assessmenthearing ........................................................... ............................... Fall, 2012 Page 21 of 21 w9eA, lam FEASIBILITY STUDY - BA 383 o G ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT r )° CITY OF EDINA v a STREET IMPROVEMENTS W 44TH STREET — BROOKSIDE TERRACE to FRANCE AVENUE January 04, 2011 Appendix Table of Contents Appendix A — Catalpa Tree Project Documentation Appendix B — Property Owner Questionnaires Informational Meeting Letters Information Meeting PowerPoint Presentations Attendance List and Comments Project Comments and Letters Received Appendix C — Edina Comprehensive Plan Elements Appendix D — Assessment Policies and Preliminary Assessment Roll Appendix A Catalpa Tree Project Documentation Page A -2 of A -32 Minutes — April 12, 2005 Edina Heritage Preservation Board B. Baird House Tour Planner Repya explained that Brad and Arlene Forrest had originally invited the Board to tour their home last winter, however, due to scheduling conflicts, the tour was postponed. Since then, it has been decided that with May being Preservation Month, it would be a perfect time for the tour. That being the case, the Forrests are looking forward to welcoming the Board to their home before the regular May meeting on May 10`h at 6:00 p.m. Board members marked their calendars and expressed their delight in the upcoming tour. No formal action was taken. IV. OTHER BUSINESS: A. Historic Site Location Map - Discussion For the benefit of the four new members to the Heritage Preservation Board, Consultant Vogel reviewed the landmark designated properties in the City. He explained that the map will assist the Board in keeping track of projects within the city. Mr. Vogel also explained that when the city code was updated in 2002, it was designed to handle up to 50 designated properties, with a projected pace of adding 2 new designations per year (there are currently 5 individually designated properties and one district designation). Board members reviewed the map, asking for clarification on some of the designations No formal action was taken. cI3 Preser.vation,of- ..Historic-Catalpa. Trees - / Rare Boulevard Tcees = Discussionrj Consultant Vogel explained that interest has been expressed regarding protection of the Catalpa trees lining W. 441h Street between Browndale Avenue and Wooddale Avenue. He pointed out that these trees are historically significant because Jonathan Grimes who as a nurseryman and President of the Minnesota Horticultural Society brought the Catalpa tree to Minnesota in the 1850's. Apparently, Mr. Grimes had admired the Catalpa as a beautiful, tall, fast growing boulevard tree when visiting Cincinnati. In addition to the trees planted along W. 44th Street, the Minneapolis Park Board also planted 50,000 of the trees throughout the city. In keeping with his interest in the Catalpa, Mr. Grimes wrote several articles touting its merits, which were published in the MN Horticultural Society's bulletins. Mr. Vogel explained that there is a place within Edina's preservation code to designate living things if they are deemed historically significant. Because the Catalpa's are on the City right -of -way, the designation would not be unlike the Cahill School and Grange Hall, which are City owned. 3 Minutes — April 12, 2005 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Board members asked if Mr. Vogel was looking for a motion favoring designation. He explained that he wanted to go on record identifying the Catalpa as potential for designation. However, before further action is taken, he would recommend that a comprehensive survey of the City be undertaken to identify other trees that might qualify for historic designation. Planner Repya suggested that Mr.'Vogel meet with the City Forester, Tom Horwath. She pointed out that Mr. Horwath has worked for the- City for a long time and is very well acquainted with the City's tree stock. Mr. Vogel agreed that would be an excellent idea. No formal action was taken. C. Highway 100 /Minnehaha Creek Sound wall — Project Update Consultant Vogel reminded the Board that the Minnesota Department of Transportation was considering the Board's request to revise the sound -wall over Minnehaha Creek to provide a more aesthetically pleasing structure from the creek side. He explained that he has not seen a final plan, but feels confident that some measures will be taken to "soften" the impact. Planner Repya offered to check with Engineer, Wayne Houle to see where the potential revision plans stood. No formal action was taken. D. 50th Anniversary of Southdale Mall — October 8, 1956 Consultant Vogel noted that the 50th anniversary of the Southdale Mall is coming up in October of 2006. He indicated it would be a good idea for the Heritage Preservation Board to work on some sort of commemoration, (perhaps in conjunction with the Edina Historical Society) to recognize this important date in the City's history. Board members agreed that would be an important item to include in future work plans. No formal action was taken. E. Comprehensive Preservation Plan - Update As a means.of bringing the new members up to speed regarding the Comprehensive Plan the Board has been working on, Mr. Vogel explained that thus far, the Board has completed the Mission Statement and Vision for the plan. Due to the large turnover in membership, the project was put on hold to allow the new members to gain some knowledge and history about City's preservation activities. He pointed out that the Plan will be a policy manual to guide decision making for the Board and City Council as well as to maintain an institutional memory. Board members were presented copies of the executive summary of the City's Vision 20/20 plan. Mr. Vogel pointed out that the preservation plan will serve the HPB, setting out goals, objectives and policies for preservation, much like the Vision 20/20 plan serves to guide decisions impacting the City's future. Board members appreciated receiving copies of Vision 20/20, pointing out that the preservation plan should dovetail with this document as well as the City's Comprehensive Plan. No formal action was taken. 4 Appendix B Property Owner Questionnaires Informational Meeting Letters Information Meeting PowerPoint Presentations Attendance List and Comments Project Comments and Letters Received Page A -3 of A-32 o e o 0 November 16, 2010 City of Edina RE: West 44th Street Reconstruction - Resident Questionnaire Dear Resident: The City of Edina and the City of St. Louis Park have initiated the process of roadway and utility improvements for the summer of 2011 for your neighborhood. The first step was to hold an open house on October 28, 2010, for you to become familiar with the street reconstruction process. A second meeting will be held on December 8, 2010, where preliminary design drawings of the roadway and a typical estimated assessment amount will be presented. You will receive a separate notice by mail for this meeting. The next step is to get feedback from you regarding a number of key components of the project. The information you share with us is essential in determining certain aspects of the project that may be constructed. Please read the information below before you complete the questionnaire. Things to know and consider: • Residents in Edina pay a portion of the overall project cost in the form of a special assessment. West 441h Street is a Municipal State Aid route, in which both Cities are eligible to receive funding from Mn /DOT for the street improvements as long as it meets their design standards. The City of Edina's assessment policy identifies that 20% of the street improvement costs for .the project are specially assessed to the adjacent benefitting properties. Special assessments are based on a Residential Equivalent Unit (REU) or, per property, and are payable over 10 years. Residents in St. Louis Park will not be specially assessed unless the project does not meet Mn /DOT design standards and funding is not received from Mn /DOT. The estimated special assessment for your neighborhood will not be determined until after information has been gathered from the questionnaires and a feasibility report is completed, which is planned to be complete in January 2011. An estimated range of the assessment amount will be provided to you at the December 8 informational meeting. If the project is completed during the summer of 2011, the special assessment for your property will not be levied until fall 2012. Special assessments for roadway projects in the City of Edina typically fund roadways, sidewalks, and street lights. Other utility upgrades such as water City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952- 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 441h Street Reconstruction - Resident Questionnaire Page 2 of 2 main, sanitary sewer, storm sewer and concrete curb and gutter are funded through the utility fund and are not special assessed. • Construction typically starts in spring /early summer and end in late fall of the same year. Questionnaire: The following information explains the questionnaire that is enclosed. A map showing the boundaries of the area to be reconstructed is attached to this letter. After reading this letter completely, please complete the questionnaire and return by November 30, 2010, in the self - addressed stamped envelope. I. Drainage Service Connection Do you use a sump pump or have you considered installing one? Do you currently have a footing drain? The project could include a sump drain system along the roadway to collect groundwater, storm water runoff, and discharges from private sump pumps, roof drains or any other runoff from private property. A typical sump pump discharges onto a homeowner's lawn. This can cause problems with your lawn, your neighbor's lawn, your basement if your lawn drains back to your home or with the street if the sump pump constantly runs down the gutter line promoting algae growth. Discharging the sump pump into the sanitary sewer system such as floor drains or laundry tubs is against the law, both City Ordinance and State Statute. If the topography and final street designs favor a City sump drain system, we will need to know if you currently have a sump pump or a footing drain. The line from the home to the City sump drain system would be your responsibility including any plumbing modifications needed to connect your sump pump. The City of Edina's sump drain system is funded through the storm sewer utility fund. We also would like to know about any local drainage problems. This might be an opportunity for the sump drain system to correct these issues. II. Local Drainage Problems Does storm water run -off stand in the street or sidewalk in front of your house? As part of the storm sewer and sump drain design process, we would like to know if this or similar situations are occurring in your area. If so, please describe it in the local drainage problems section of the questionnaire. We will review them for possible corrective action. III. Residential Streetlights As part of all reconstruction projects, staff typically asks if residents favor upgrading their streetlight system. In some cases, the streetlight system is at the end of its useful life and requires upgrading. We do not know yet the condition of your specific streetlight system; an evaluation will be done later. For the City of Edina, funding for 44`h Street Reconstruction - Resident Questionnaire Page 3 of 3 streetlights are currently through special assessment. The City of St. Louis Park will also special assess street lighting upgrades as well. In the residential streetlight option section of the questionnaire, are examples of the different styles of street lighting that could be installed in your neighborhood. Please rank your style preferences. Please note that ranking your style preferences does not mean you are in favor of streetlights. IV. Private Underground Utilities Some residents install private underground utilities in the City -owned boulevards, also called the right -of -way (ROW). These utilities are usually lawn irrigation or pet containment systems. Utility and roadway reconstruction can damage these utilities. If they are damaged, they will be restored only if you indicate that you have these systems on your returned questionnaire in the private underground utilities section. Additionally, if the contractor knows the location of these private utilities, they can attempt to avoid damaging them during construction. V. Pedestrian Issues If you know of a problem at a pedestrian crossing, missing sidewalk, or other pedestrian issues, please tell us about it in that section of the questionnaire. VI. Traffic Management The Edina Transportation Commission typically reviews traffic issues on local streets. We would like to know if you feel that your roadway has any traffic issues. Please tell us about it in the traffic management section of the questionnaire. VII. On- street Parking Currently, there are no restrictions for on- street parking on West 44th Street in the residential areas and vehicles can park on both sides of the street. In order to meet Mn /DOT design standards, the roadway must be minimum 32 -feet wide in order to have parking on one side of the street. The existing street widths are generally 27 to 32 feet wide within the residential areas of the roadway corridor. The City plans to apply for a variance from Mn /DOT to reconstruct the roadway to a width less than 32 feet in order to minimize disruption to the trees that exist along the edges of the street and to allow parking on one side of the street. There are several factors that determine what side of the street parking will be allowed on. We are looking for feedback in the questionnaire on your feeling on how important it is to have parking in front of your home or property. Receive Project Updates via the City Extra If you sign up for our "City Extra" e-mail notification service, you will receive project updates as they occur. During this stage of the project, such updates are usually notifications of upcoming meetings. Later, if the Council chooses to proceed with construction of this project, the updates will occur weekly. During construction, the updates will include information such as when access to your driveway might be limited or when to have your 44`h Street Reconstruction - Resident Questionnaire Page 4 of 4 contractor repair your private lawn irrigation system if it was damaged by construction activities. The City Extra service is free and allows you to sign up to receive messages from the City regarding this project, and any other project of interest. To sign up for the service, go to the City Extra website at httg : / /citvextra.cityofedina.com. Follow the instructions to sign up and then select "44th Street - Minnesota Highway 100 to France Avenue" from the list of projects under Public Works. Any information you provide will be confidential and only specific information you request will be sent to you. Your subscriptions are protected by your own personal password. If you do not have access to email or the internet, please call me at 952 - 826 -0371, and I will have hard copy of correspondences sent to you. Questions If you have questions after reading this letter, please feel free to call Shibani Bisson with WSB & Associates, Inc. at 763 - 287 -7162 or myself at 952- 826 -0371. Sincerely, Wayne D. Houle, P.E. Director of Public Works /City Engineer Enclosures: Map Questionnaire Self- Addressed Envelope cc: City of St. Louis Park - Engineering Department Please read the enclosed cover letter first and then complete the survey. Please return this survey by November 30, 2010, using the self - addressed, stamped envelope. I. Drainage Service Connection: s CITY OF 1PSATiK LOUIS ❑ No ❑Unknown B. Does your home have a sump pump? ❑ No ❑Unknown C. Would you be willing to connect your sump pump Please read the enclosed cover letter first and then complete the survey. Please return this survey by November 30, 2010, using the self - addressed, stamped envelope. I. Drainage Service Connection: A. Does your home have a drain tile /footing drain? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑Unknown B. Does your home have a sump pump? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑Unknown C. Would you be willing to connect your sump pump to a City drain, if provided (at your own cost)? ❑ Yes ❑ No D. Would you be willing to connect your roof drains to a City drain, if provided (at your own cost)? ❑ Yes ❑ No Please sketch in the space to the right: your house, garage, driveway, sump pump discharge location, and approximately where along the right -of -way (ROW) line you would like the service connection pipe located. If you do not fill out this information, the City cannot guarantee that a City drain will be provided to your property with the construction project. HOUSE EXAMPLE GVVaE HO" SSWCE oC NEcnm RPE WERE ROW um II. Local Drainage Problems - please list specific surface water drainage problems in your neighborhood: III. Residential Streetlights: A. Do you favor upgrading your streetlights (there would be a special assessment cost to your property)? ❑ Yes ❑ No B. If the streetlights are upgraded, which style do you prefer? Please rank all the styles from 1 to 5, with 5 being nWUSt nKeu. rWedse dnbwer, evert II yuu dnbwereu rw In SeLtion III. H. Acorn: Style can be viewed along Concord Ave. Dislike ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Like from Valley View Rd. to South View Ln, Edina. 1 2 3 4, 5 Arlington Lantern:. Style can be viewed. in the Country Club neighborhood, just north of West 50th St. Dislike ❑ ❑ [3.C3 Q Like along Wooddale Ave., Edina. 1 2 3 4 5 Lt Coach: Style can be viewed in the Sunnyslope Dislike ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Like neighborhood, just north of Edina City Hall, Edina. 1 2 3 4 5 Round Lantern: Style can be viewed at County Road 101 and Dislike ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ []Like W 78th St North, Maple Grove. 1 2 3 4 5 PROPERTY OWNER IV. Private Underground Utilities: A. Do you have an underground lawn irrigation system in the City's right of way? (The right of way varies between 5'to 15' behind the roadway.) ❑ Yes ❑ No B. Do you have an underground electric pet containment system in the City's right of way? ❑ Yes ❑ No If.you have these systems and do not check Yes, the City cannot guarantee that these systems will be repaired or replaced with the construction project and would therefore be repaired at your cost. V. Pedestrian Issues: A. Please list any specific neighborhood pedestrian issues below. VI. Traffic Management: A. Do you feel your neighborhood or roadway has any traffic issues? ❑ Yes ❑ No B. If yes, what is it and where does it occur? VII. On- street Parking: A. Parking will be allowed on one side of the roadway, and may vary from side to side. How important is it Not Important ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Important to have parking in front of your home or property? 1 2 3 4 5 Vlll. Other Comments: Thank you for taking time to complete this survey. Your feedback is important to us to make this project a success. Please complete all questions and return this questionnaire in the enclosed self- addressed, stamped envelope by November 30, 2010. @ _ S T. L OF ST. LOUIS PA RK RK �' PROPERTY OWNER IV. Private Underground Utilities: A. Do you have an underground lawn irrigation system in the City's right of way? (The right of way varies between 5'to 15' behind the roadway.) ❑ Yes ❑ No B. Do you have an underground electric pet containment system in the City's right of way? ❑ Yes ❑ No If.you have these systems and do not check Yes, the City cannot guarantee that these systems will be repaired or replaced with the construction project and would therefore be repaired at your cost. V. Pedestrian Issues: A. Please list any specific neighborhood pedestrian issues below. VI. Traffic Management: A. Do you feel your neighborhood or roadway has any traffic issues? ❑ Yes ❑ No B. If yes, what is it and where does it occur? VII. On- street Parking: A. Parking will be allowed on one side of the roadway, and may vary from side to side. How important is it Not Important ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Important to have parking in front of your home or property? 1 2 3 4 5 Vlll. Other Comments: Thank you for taking time to complete this survey. Your feedback is important to us to make this project a success. Please complete all questions and return this questionnaire in the enclosed self- addressed, stamped envelope by November 30, 2010. 4'/411CAE9Qi QerS� m� �_ .ta ` .�n . ® EB� � . ® (5� 1 t p L'� /l� 'D! .E+ •m4 m� f '�� .® rg . ' lIi , —� l L. R.- E �®- -B. 1y t t ' Y_ aOD. ef Qa ' �U ,� ;iBm ' t l , ' m V g� - 1 n„ y' � � '/. . - I � ' JB® � ) E, 90 i � � - 8 t� 'I e � �' I I 117""'pscc1 77 � ,Y � . � I . _ � ; j � II I I!j��" 'I j. i � ` I�l l � +L!I I � Ip i Ii E !� i .I � � II 1 f 1i t 1 II I I I f ' l (m} � ` .iY eo_ _ -t - GGIIa i pp }r � I �'t . a'', ' 1�h s 'i �.; '' „ . _ ; ._ . - �° w - �� - � 17I •A. � - , o` .,1\. '\ C.l\ ij- I I d ��I I, !It �. 7i ; IEI � aII�L._- •_ , . I — � ; . , —' a® - o � _ - 54 -!� . 1_ gg �0 ali1I � 17 l 'll i_ 7 I j •i ' j1 l ; l I j - i► I.' t IIl ' 0_�.,B� _ a,o , I . 1 III_II1i IJl1 I ' `, . ` N jl�.�; - .lij : ! - �' : mip 1 1 \�'` 7 J _ : '-� .�� B - { 1 I!ai ro '0s; , 8 •i;r- ti ��2,i� + 'l l2 ,'_ rI` i _ l. .! , : , a ' . ' � \ let1e l �_ ; fP \, I IF I ai + j c ; � N r �, k �� a i Vi� I \� t _ i;'_ ` 1 I7, i S 08 ea Jar/Jy Part •i ® � , ,^ l - ► � E� � , ` r t It '!� I ' �! l , ' 1+ /` l 4 �� - `` ":t.= t � Q . , -= "' `-_ " ; , . a �F\ _ `' f ' li ` � y� l ,I t _i � \t " t�'_e,'. `" - \ \ .� \\, "\\ , i�I , :� I � t � . - � _ �i 'm - ._ - _ _ g , - _ . 1p $ i,� ia , � I (III II I � IIk I I I I , �471. 7�j�i i� • 1� 70 - 9I 3 6– 9t1- 7 ®e9 ` 79 J 25 400, 14 it=o'„ 4171 . 110 4188 Mr. .,w ,1,544 4203. ind, J 17 43 - ,. ;1116&- 4W Afto «0!«0x aim L 11 if J. Timid ea Pad If Edina IN Pod ; 'ark" If If 1�71 - , C� E P49�^7J4OA��4©fl_F4Q �D ffi 4t 44 . � -, r? �a . - !1 � � ��. %��\ �'�(49R�81 =� -• -- - , Ir.: C86�,� —!1 -r _ -ter: - — -- _ =;' l�Q7�E� �,N���� Fb: KtO1B8617 1G19W�ttItWNas�_mop�mrq Nov 15, m10 t1:1B',m AM RICITY of W 44th St Improvements Legend PSAiK TLouis City of Edina & o Aso Feet City of St. Louis Park Project Location I_ _ I Properties Adjacent to Project WSS Data Entered By: Last Date Data Entered: Due Date: Questionnaires Sent Out: Questionnaires Returned: Percent Returned: Data Checked By /Date: S. Montague 6- Dec -10 November 30, 2010 106 60 57% C. Hartzell K.t0 1686- 17v4dmiMXO0WI 11510 ueslionairrelBA -383 W 4<tlt SI Oueslionnaire Tab,latiOn.xh 1 /4/2011 1 016 VII. O.-Street L Drainage Service Connection IL Local Drainage Problems Ill. Residential Street Lights IV. Private Underground Utilities V. Pedestrian Issues VI. Traffic Management Parking VIII. Other Comments Conrad VKulg to Conned Wiling to Conned Favor Upgad'ulg Pet containment Neighborhood Draintde or Fooli Drain Has a Sump Pump to City Drain Roof Drains List Local Drainage Problems Suee1 Lights Platerted Styles - Like =5• Dislike =l Irritation s s. in r/w s rem Traffic Issues? Returned Arlington Round Imponan1=5, Not ADDRESS Surrey Yes No Unkn Yes No Unkn Yes No Yes No Explain Yes No Amm Lantern Coach Lantern Yes No Yes No LIM Pedestrian issues. Yes No If es, what and where? Imponant =l 3924 44th Street West f 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 4 5 1 1 1 8- 9 a.m. 5. 8 .m. 1 ., -, •. '. i„ r :.' , .tip , _X - - o(IJ4th' I'n fed_ pakgg tai the north'slde, .. i- .,SUeel becomes a s91ety issue .859is, _ s t re61y`dillwM1io 3eeonCUrtdtg traffffc -wh i r' aui .'Ihle �.Da N -did tl Iblll k dt p !h'ew•d1( " .'. -. '.. 1. ., '_' r; •`.•:. r- ., r c' g� Ave •44m'sheei'rain France' live nearemoma6demBiotik ': - _ ., _, . ; ; . � + - .., e - '�.. •. . .. - • .. .. , :. .: •.' _ -^ +, - - `. Av'enve- Yiesivrald untA'pmd eta - vertte pail neerM Gonto(I. .- 0930 44th Sireel VYest t ...._. _ . 1 � • . - - , ... 1• :....: < 1 . - .: .. '' - - -. , ,: t ,.. .. ...... .'. � .. i,.: :. ` -f r 1 ... � . -.: F 5 -. ,' t . . & t .., .. rl . .. 1:. _ 1 _ : Y - - �e::veh'Kies uliLse tad fast ..I,. "oat House. �...- Shouldn't we be reducing nmoff with water gardens, etc? High pedestrian usage on 441h High traffic volume 8 on-street Street near France. Need parking too near driveways, Porlding on sidewalk aM in gutter, poorly sidewalk On south side as well Creates visibility /safety Issues Biking , this is a major bike mule, and 3939 44th Street West 1 1 1 1 sb 1 1 3 2 2 1 1 as north. 1 when exiting driveways. 7 et is difficult to safe bike on. • ,a r .. x- 't- L= r NAlittq ,Or d s c iI , -.r k^ 2. Sidewe0io3'ou s e pad n e5ida�5 o5A Wa ma tl Y P •r•. •�, a 1 _r t4 1 , .. S i� - - iii'. IieatreeL•In.fio ef'ou ho55e'al -.: .., . ,. -, ,J -. .c p ... � ,. ., .. "•, . -:.• 'c - F 1. - `eidusfNeisedioa. fir. _ F aM- C rverAve -n -c!. ,,rE•r. t. _+, '.d see, _fig_ -south• .'oalo A4lhhave bads thnes` gh frothithe.viesr WO -5 • - r,. �,,• .' ., :. 1 ;: -.. - �. - , . , -, .. ; _ _ ,[,, .,... - - J .- '.: , , '. . _r' .r - -,. '�. r � _ .!, S .bet .`ASldewalk'o ,. sfd' :madied etos < e,•plus awe' c Z . wltneii n ma Y; !!e `reccitle' re.a"s'oars creep . , _, �. •.4 -. �..... 008.. , ,. 44th SVeetWasf_ . , .:.. 1 • ,. -. � •: <.-':t.. _- r ., ,.... -•-:,• _._ ., ; ,1:. - ....... �. ._- _r .:. s +_Y. ,• ,.._ � :Y,., i - ' -. r,...... �_ -..,, .. r:_'. •.. .. ,t." - i' .-c': >r .. :3.•':.'-s_, = ':.2. -._.s7 r -1 _i_:' >,Y...•..': - 1�'c - "' lad Vro` - -a0e .1119. v . 44th and Curve Avenue on the Curve 4008 44th Street VVast t 1 1 1 Avenue site of the Intersection. 1 3 7 3 5 1 1 1 Speeding most at night 1 ' - r. , .r ... - _..:.- ... . .- .ter. '...:•�r. •.r:. r. _.....- .. -_ -�;a. , y : t' .. -t.. > ... _.ti - _ . .,, :., , s ..., t�. .. ... ...- .• -. -. •, I p'.. :r.- t' `.; 1 J <,�� ?.:.,:. •.d .1 � %' '..,�$ T. - s;: I f> � ,.y,+ - P (Whenbot ... ide's'o(_,e street era .h '- r . ?- 0104Ath .....,_400 thSlteal Wall _. .- r.,'__1.... _..1. r... -... _._ � _ _ 4.:, -.. __. �, .. -._ _ . , _ ... is , _1 - ..4 -. 1 ... � +,.. .None .: .e _ .. _c „ . -it.• : -:.-7 �-- , :5:•5. -. a4 ,`7. _ ...3r'__ _ ,ib;d i :., 5:>'..r f�_QSC -, .'S, ,_:Unevand etched sWewalksT ; -�d,.1 -... arkad "across aum od8'ano9ar„ ,d y p _.o ,,.refei. � rktil �on'onie slee:on Speeding - W. 44 SL. France to Grimes, Grimes to Wooddale not slopping at 4-way Intersections on 4011 441h Street West 1 1 1 1 5 1 1 1 W. 44 St. 1 .. . X4015 4ath.5treei West. - :u 1 _. 7....- .. .. _..tar......, ♦ 1 .. .. , -. . ✓.., 1 . V, 0 1.. .a.: Y -!:, _ Sidewalks are ethical to our neighborhood culture. We want Cars speeding• not stopping at 4020 44th Street Vilest 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 4 4 2 1 1 our sidewalks intact. 1 intersection. 1 We do not want street parking. . .. 60 td _.- z Slfeet -,,, -„ 4th. West...,.... t. .. t -- ,., ..._au..'Y._. .., -.. -K . ,.. , 1 � �.: ... .. ,. ,... -. . ,c.1..m , 1. -„ '.Y.% x. -; -'. . 1 .� •'.... .. .i _. h. v.. ,......._,.,None . _- . r .. ,fit .., _.. .f.., .. ;.. -,: . 1:,3, .1 �.. ,4 x -,3. .33�s. ti,'r. f, . t . i v,:: �7:r n�. Nono ,. -tS;, S 1' >'v' s _.r. c.', 't -�i By creating a wider street and 6rte0ng parking to one side, similar to Wooddale, traffic will speed up and increase if 8 doesnl'I have obstacles. 0 will become a Access to the park (Kojetin more popular thoroughfare. 1 say leave Perk). The block is long. so a the same width and allow parking on cars drive very fast by the time both sides. especially If you aren't going they are in front of the park. At rush hour limes, especially - to add a stop sign and crosswalk at the There needs to be a crosswalk used as a aaemate to 50th and park. We have had loo many dose calls and speed bumps or slop sign Excelsior Blvd — people drive very with cars driving too fast and kids not 4112 441h Street West 1 1 1 1 1 None. 1 4 4 5 5 1 1 so children can safely cross. 1 fast down 44th. 5 judging the speed correctly. ,.., r_ .. ....., .-. ,r ., s ,_S , .:. •1: - , ;�_ - - ;Pao -pie drive too -fe5l Gown filth- ..Ua9 .''twee' V•*✓. �sd ' : .. _... va 1 ,. < ,, ,? , ..• _, - :,, : v, c- Y -. - r w •_• :. ., ,... . „- -..., v • ,. -. -. ... ;,. ; .. . . .. ,.: , ......, , , .. a - - `y r 44th Dangerous wssirg to � cape y m be n VVOOdtlale •'i '. ,. five ' are a drlveWay co . -'n' ,needs' Sh . mph v.a -, -., -.r, ., .,,. - ,. . -, ,i5'' BWO >. ,,. :,- •' "KajeOn Park• needs Cross all :, 'and Grimes =which leads to r to Ire ebb tp 'perKpn street -elthe 91tle; . -d 8 . .. 11 4 West ,_ `....,. 4 th Street:We -1,. ,�: .'+ r:: 1.., - - -a .. ; ":'L., r... !, >,;. i had ... -: ,, '..,' t_:r:'. _., 1. i 1...5+,2. I t 1. .. •3�ti 1 .,..i ^- 1; PLEASE.! :L Inl.abdva.. 5, 'nom %:.: Lt tEne. though. I have a shared driveway and on• street parking is important for guests and service "hides. Our approach is so defedive that all vehldes h1i when 4120 441h Street West 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 5 4 1 1 1 5 ni in. , _,- : I _ .. 1 ,' ., ..- a e : .. �. Busytcadway;fofalttypes o •, P ers •- :tt makessense for !ttY. pedfve •), - rr , - �, l' t - - ., 0811 'dati0nl9tbdt0fdf.. spo - r _ t a k1e of the have arkfn on he'sktew 0.s P 9 _. . dt27 lath SlreetWesl. - -_ .. .. ,. j.,. ..,. .._ .. ,..., ;t. .,. _ ,- ... _. � '. -•. t ,- �•.� -_ _, ,. � •� ... .:: _ -:. .. ? ,. .. -, .. .. Depends on cost �- `7r� "��. -r ' - -, ... 1. 1 5 ..�'S, r- 1'`' .1 .a.. S �AabmrmUate'a0•please.' ;1, 5 N�. s�' 1 _ streel. . K.t0 1686- 17v4dmiMXO0WI 11510 ueslionairrelBA -383 W 4<tlt SI Oueslionnaire Tab,latiOn.xh 1 /4/2011 1 016 K: 10 16 86- 1 7 V,dndmDocs %1115100uestionairreMM-38] W44111 St Ouestionnaue Tabulation,a1s 1/42011 2.16 VIL on-street L Drainage Service Connection IL local Onlnage Problems ITT. Residential Street Lights IV. Private Underground Utilities V. Pedestrian Issues VI. Traffic Management Parking VIII. Other Comments Contact Willing to Connect Wiling to Conned Favor Upgrading Pet containment Neighborhood Orairdde or Footl Drain Has a Surnp Pump to C.1, Drain Roof Drains List Local Drainage Problems Street Liatits Preferred Styles - LBre =5, DBflke =1 Irrigation s . in rfw s tam Traffic Issues? Arlington Round Returned ImpoAam =5, Not ADDRESS Survey Yes No Unkn Yes No Unkn Yes No Yes No Explain Yes No Acom Lantern Coach Lantern Yes No Yes No List pedestrian issues. Yes No dl yes. what and where? ImpoAanmt Our yard is a very low, area. We have drain aroun the front of The house. The streets storm drain is In from of our house and sometimes backs up. Our property (and perhaps the backyard of the home to the Immediate west of us) ts probeby the lowest hMB property Has the City compared the costs of . along 44th Street. A storm sewer Is Near France Avenue there Is loo concrete and asphalt side-by -side? located on The street In front of our Pedestrians crossing the street much on-street parking and Concrete lasts far longer. Is sourced property. This often collects dells at 44th & Fence Businesses not IraltirJpedestrdan crossings. locally, contains no petroleum and (leaves, twigs, fresh. e1G) and has to be at crosswalks. Same issue at Worry about traffic at Kjoten Park, reduces the urban heat island. It is a far 4140 44th Street Nest 1 1 1 cleared ahead of or duA a big rein. 1 1 5 4 4 1 1 1 Kjoten Park 1 I like one side only parking Idea. 5 more sustainable material. it B very knporlenNo have continuous paftV on one side of the street for . - - - normal gatherings, maintenance ... _ - Pedestrian crosswalk for the - vehicles, aril delivery vehfd4s.. We also Robert 4. K6jWn Park from feel very strong That If more width Is 7. .. _ _ nom to south across street We (eel That speed is IT ma)w needed to accommodate, it should be - - Because This perk is accessed conCem. Many mOlodsts exceed the side that Eros not already been ' ' - so frequently, IT should be a •. the current 30 mph, and we would Impacted With a sidewalk In out . :.. ,. '' _ ; .,• . - crosswalk with yellow Bashing " . Oka to see this dropped to 25 mph : Particular situation, the parking should • . •_ , . when fights _ pnessad.by a or some type o(Impsdlmems put be abler slde „but tiro extra width come, ' d150 h.$treel Wes( 1 f' -. 1 .. -• '. 1 No, • 1 - - 2 - : 5• 3 3 ,:. t `, .1 pedestrian. 1 In - place . to reduce. speed. 5 from the south side. 1 would prefer NOT to have sidewalks an the south side of Between Wooddale b Grimes - the street Our lots are quite traffic is often way too fast. A I am very concerned about widening the shallow already. speed bump or traffic slowing street or adding sidewalks to the south device would be helpful near the side. Our lots are very shallow. A Great to have a pedestrian park - about midway between this sidewalk would put pedestrians 4155 44th Street West 1 1 1 1 1 None. 1 2 1 1 4 5 1 1 cross at Koletin Park 1 very long block. 3 Practically at my front doorl Having if park With no - .fit Grimes ai Koodele, drivers ' ', '• - :. �, - .. , pedesWan access, does not know they have a long straight •. make sense; -There is no _ a - Waler^gathers and overflows by the. -.. sidewalk on the park We, so a' _ lop speed � the park. Any n , . 1 '. street drain M front of our Clouse -there $ ' - rrosn"PC S slgnage is deflnitely . gt"red or visual Impaalmeas - .. 418/ 44th "Steer West 1 1 1 1 Y crisp a Wit' b roadway there. 1 2 • ] • . 5 . 4 1 1 races L to ee ding ' would be nice.' Speeding cars between Wooddale and Grimes b a ' Speeding between Wooddale ' Keep parking on north side of Nth, danger especially at Kojetn and Grime is dangerous. nee to sidewalk Park. Force Blooma to provide off We should bury all overhead utility street parking for clients. lines on 44th SLI Plant mare boulevard trees to ' Keep Kojetin Park a Walk up- ' Create municipal parking lot behind 4188 44th Street West 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 5 1 f I 1 1 slow down traffic. 1 I part. No off- street parking. 5 Convention Grill. . •,'4 - - .. - I preserve this' J 4200 •ii. $UeefWest. • 1 1. ::. :.••. 1 . '; 1 .' 1 •- _.• .. _. "..._�, f •'. -,1 5 '_1 1 City ark across the street.;1: H h volurrro:h h Speed. 2 re�e18M4%Ael'afreel�(o tit Would like traffic earning bumpouts near park Kajegn and erdra parking at the park using parking bays on the park There isn't much water. Haven't had any side. drainage issues since 812009. It is dangerous io cross from the Can dine too fast pest the Would like a crosswalk at each end of 4208 44th Street West 1 1 1 1 1 I would (connect) If a problem arises. 1 4 5 4 4 1 1 sidewalk to the 1 Kojetin Park where kids play. 5 the park. . - - 'Speeding Ifaftic. Edina Cleaners ' C n90 rossf t park is dangerous., truck- noise issues. speeding..: .. _ 4208 'Street West 44th 1 1 1 '. 3 - 5 f 1. L o etin . 1 . , drives b an the hour. Constant high rates of speed In excess of posted unit. Mainly between Grimes and Wooddals. Need to slow traffic down Need crosswalk from sidewalk to Kojetin 4210 44th Street West 1 1 1 1 1 WA 1 1 5 1 1 1 1 1 especially near Ko etin Parkll 1 Park - - • - I think b makes sense to have the parking on the side where there's a - A crosswalk eW6rsldewalk Is sidewalk it would seem like a good Went -. , needed by Tito park between • to put a curb ctit for parting along - 4212 44th Street West t 1 - - 1 - 1 - 1 None that rm aware of - 1 ` -- ' ] . ? 11 '4 5 - . 1. �1 Grimes and Wboddale. i ° _ 5 Ko etin Perk Very difficult to cross 44th SL from north side to south side at Kojetin Park. Drivers often ignore children waiting to cross. Al the away stop on 44th are and I have witnessed several Wooddale. ours often roll the stop NE corner of 44th 8 Wooddale has children being caught in the or speed to h, oftentimes drivers vVe have small kids. I prefer parking on pooled water often. Sidewalk in front of road with drivers increasing ignore pedestrians in crosswalk sidewalk side of street in front of my 4216 / 4213 has puddles often. 4424 speed towards them rather than and Proceed. Several near home for their friends that visil for safety 44th has pooled water on both sidewalk slowing. Also disappearing misses have occurred in recent reasons. Would prefer both side parking and street. NW comer of 44th and Dad sidewalk on north side of 441h years and one child was hit by as 4 slows speeding drivers rushing to 4216 44th Street West I 1 I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 pooled water. 1 5 1 ] 4 1 1 west of Browndale to Hwy. 100. I car. 5 and groin the comer. K: 10 16 86- 1 7 V,dndmDocs %1115100uestionairreMM-38] W44111 St Ouestionnaue Tabulation,a1s 1/42011 2.16 K:101686.17'A0,niMDocsl l 11510OueshonairrelBA -363 W 44111 51 Oueslienna., e Tahufal«on.,ts ' 1/412011 3 m 6 VII, On-Street I. Drainage Service Connection IL Local Drainage Problems III. Residential Street Lights N. Private Underground Utilities V. Pedestrian Issues VI. Traffic Management Parking VIII. Other Comments Contact Wiling to Connect Wiling to Connect Favor Upgrading Pet conlainment Neighborhood Drainlee or Foolln g Drain He a Sump Pump to Cil Drain Roof Drains List Local Drainage Problems Street Llohts Prate Styles , Like =S. Dislike =l Irrigation z s. in rfw s lam Traffic Issues? Retume0 Important =5, Not Arlington Round ADDRESS Survey Yes No Unkn Yes No Unkn Yes No Yes No Esplain Yes No Acom LBmem Coact Lantern Yes No Yes No List pedestrian issues. Yes No II es. what and where? Important =l T C i r �T l a, :. `� ::' , ', , .. , t• ;:,.,. .1' . ?K� i' Haye yin � ^44 t, _.i ,: No sio' DNS ed'DUdI „psig .pct p i• r ' " , - • _ ' '. , "• °' ? , '. ' ` i ,, , ; .•• ' 1 <' •, •! -. ,: a ' �s Yste ' ed' S Crosivre0i heed of th L ~Aibetween belweeil'.Gdmes`b WdoddBO on t ,'.,: _ :,., .. .. - -.' 1. .. _ ,. �,,,._ -, :6.. - .• _ .. _. .NOMeast carhefo144th 6y1opddak', .. .fie M Pe .4! ,. r -`' lbuinoiN F P?.a(. lN000dale6 t,,. 5,- �'4ah Si iesdslo carsEr over vlRg r. 1 A28 44 U th,S eat Nlest .,._1 .. .,_. t. 1_. -, , . .:. . .. ':, . ,�. i._,. s.. - ,. :. - ,_ -.. •1 .:. 1 .. r: ' t,'?1.... ,. .�, ,. ; ......_. wales ,.. onrAst: _..... . - ROWi.._.,'.- Grvn1s1..t.o 'ihe``led, , r There's standing water after rain or snow melt in the street. along the south side of the street in front of our house at the Traffic occasionally drives too fast 4221 44th Street West 1 1 1 1 carp, 1 5 1 1 1 between Wooddale and Grimes. 2 rr. - - • • ` a- ,,. :- <, - r .. �: _ i fethre to set' o 'et 4225 441n:Stren West '' . • _ . - . �. ; _ . '- _ .:. �,__.. ' . __ - -. ' ' '• ' ., - ' 7: ' -:- Nloodda k(44 Iateuii on_: d Speed on 44th Street • volume to people do not corns W compote slops at 44th and Wooddale Need better crosswalks at 44th intersection. Need a children at and Wooddale Intersection - play sign there or camera with a maybe slightly raised like In sign reminding full stops are the 4228 44th Street West 1 1 1 1 1 Storm drainage problem on Wooddale. 1 1 5 5 1 1 1 Country Club. 1 law. 3 Please do not widen this streell as /tars , , irallrways need tip fie m "ad' �'i 5 .:.:. „ >' :. ' -' 4' lflBdB: rtlGl9'8pp�flhl a C. b' r I•' p4 s -r. ,J _., _ � , a;[, : t.., )'.� -, - 4. _1. ,diiveis.' o e s Ns ,ap ?tng on the. .... 1, 1v: � r I�IFh Would be •* :�� .. y ,i, : r J r.. rJ rr, n, ,; :,. .. � .1 . S, 5 [ .� 'a 'i" ''n.' eIV'•.W •tio's8in`'areo U E i. •r :.. .:.. F _ L._.. S r. . u+, ..ley5. n ,- n, ... .... .::.....:. . ✓. u, :1`. ?. 3 �'a i f `X '•t' - � ti '� i ✓ .. :,.' .k ? ..- < '1 ..� ::'. . t- •, _, ,.. t 1 : r s. . 4 .`tttisii: millienodtl:sMa fs .rag -'e -�Ko :�• i - a ,;`• 4 F l ,S 1 S to Park $• .441n Ire 1. the tut M - -ale _ -tY -.r 190144th Street TNesi . -.. -, -A,., r, - -, ,,., 1,.f- . «S +,. tr1.. :.. -._,. _.._. •.. ,. .:- : :.,1� .., .. .. too «knownlssues ,._,. ,, ... -. jr,. .`t -.,,, ..`.Li' =. -.o-`/5 t r,. r.'S.. '. 8" .1,11 -_r r- �.�. .9irVle south f`ide's -. LL ., DriJers:are' (ash -*I -i-- In a booming economy these issues would be nice to address but they currently don't rile to the level of Importance that would require adding 4307 44th Street V1os1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 more burden on people. c, � .' - T - i ,. �...., _. . , ., v . „ , .. °•t; 1 r , M su haNl -- ~er and I doPj,�. • - ,.., ' . • , ... ,: . . .. - .. ,. - ..... - .. .. t a , f find ooMecU� rLto.d1 drela a 6iiPIMg I30 T . , . 44th�Slreel weri '- .. 1 1. - _ _ T. . : .. 1_ ..: , .1 � _ z- •. - � .� . '': . _.. ,.'� t .. ,.. � [ti, None.. 1. 1 _2 - Lei. - a e: �isfue`es cta' 'e ca 1 But in two years not any t water Electric In winler, wren snowbanks has fence on encroach onto street, street reached home becomes too narrow for parking I would prefer parking on other side as the side of on two sides. It's light even in the rentals on the south side of 44th use 4315 Eton Place 1 1 basket. 1 1 None. 1 5 4 5 4 1 sidewaa. 1 summer. 1 much more on- street parking. .: rI31B ElomPleca ,. -.. -....' 1 _. _.. ,,1- _ ,.�:.. :,. _ �, ,>,. 1" � .. ', '1.. ..- r ."L..r . - ;. :.' - -� _ - nz' 2. ,.]„ _. 5'" - -. -4 1 - " T = ' Skid .t •.�= �'?` I would like to xe crosswalks painted on all four crossings at The comer of Dart right near the stop least three on the comer of sign doesn't drain wall at al. A big pool Wooddale & 44th. I believe a of waterfice, etc., forms after rain, snow, crosswak by Park Kojetln would Speed and respect of buses and it seems parking on one side of the 4]24 44th Street West 1 1 1 etc., needs better drainage. 1 4 3 5 5 1 1 be helpful and safer. 1 pedestrians. 3 sidewalk side would work well. r t c \..,Sa rsa(t•ith.Wupddale; _ 'A "` 'v - a 3 tiltersegloni Please keep'ld nohow here it is biil - - feature: On-' , _ _ we 5 a' r' i t "Eikcass spa abure o stop ,:es a:lraffit romp. 31; 'ran 'here rs �e aa` 6'ous. . �stre Da 9 ry 118 1 �,. , .s• y" .. .. r : ,. ^... tt �: ,. .- .• - .., -.,,' -, '. '� r - , ,al8lo a•. ns.too mucn Vohs •ai o P., b. Rte . . +and has'resufledlo'-. danla P�PerlY .. B$ _ /4366 ,. Wooddale Avenue . •.. .. , t , - - ., .� ., .. _. .. '.._. .. ; �.: __.. 1 - • ,r.• - . _, __..1.;,r .: u. 9 ... , .. .: 1, .... .+,. _. .. :,. e ,� ,:. .,.•.: Surface walerszues .. ...:: "., t.. '4 5- 3� 1. a ^« `t •,a -'.'' ak hours, c IRiro h - uhiitlenls.:' At this time 17we do not want any L reconstruction done _ how are we supposed to pay for special assessment Increase traffic speeding t 30 with the economy as is - if a ain't broken Coolidge Avenue 1 1 1 1 1 None. 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 ',ni`' ";:'`,. mph on 44th Sheel. 1 don? recon5lnhq 4. K:101686.17'A0,niMDocsl l 11510OueshonairrelBA -363 W 44111 51 Oueslienna., e Tahufal«on.,ts ' 1/412011 3 m 6 K:101686.171AwnimDocs11 115100uestionainelBA -363 W 44111 SI Oueslionnaire Tabuletion..ls 1/4/2011 4 01 6 VII. On-Street I. Drainage Service Connection IL Local Drainage Problems Ill. Residential Street Lights IV. Private Underground Utilities V. Pedestrian Issues VL Traffic Management Parking VIII. Other Comments Contact Willing to Conned Willing to Conned Favor Upgrading Pet containment Neighborhood Dminlle or Footl Drain Has a Su Pump to C Drain Roof Drains List Loral Drainage Problem Street hts Preferred Styles - Llke =5, Dislike =l Irrigation s . In dw s tam Traffic Issues? Arlington Round Retuned Important-5, Not ADDRESS Survey Yes No Unkn Yes. No Unkn Yes No Yes No Explain Yes No Acom Lament Coach Lament Yes No Yes No L'al Pedestrian Issues. Yes No If es. what and where? Important =l . _ , . ... _ ., .. .. My driveway is very steep and any 1655, ' of drlvew :iy length would make it too steep to use. - - - Our sewer and water Is a St. Louis Park utility. ft should hot pay for Edina - - Willies services we do not use and does. . .. - .. .. - 1101 benefit my property. - - - - 44th Street is a- cepectorstmAt, and the " On our Nock, there is not a cost to resIdants should be path by,all in _ curb, Sidewalk is pan of the the surrounding districts as O is used by roadbed and is patched with Aar all and connects east Edina to west 4392 Brook Avenue '. 1 A 1 .. .' 1 1 WA 1 . 3 1 3 4 1 1 when repairs are made to mad.. - 1. .. Speed 5 Edina unlike residential streets. Can are driving way too fast. They come from Vernon stop sign and speed l0 the Bmwndale stop sign. The sidewalk is right on I am on the comer of 44th & Mackey and I haw not had any drainage problem street. and l is very dangerous for people can park on Mackey. I do not 4393 Mackey Avenue 1 1 I I 1 1 1 and do not haw a stmip PUMP. 1 1 2 1 5 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 peop b on the sidewalk 1 wane to lose trees or my hedge. - Cars ttav4Bing . way too f851.111 40 - - - Concrete sidewalk is starting to 50 rtlpbO We have two children - ' - heave. Lljhting,Is p6or. underthp age of 4, and I'm scared . - - Sidewalk does not aordinue:hOm for their wag being. I'd tike to see Slope of mad towards driveway • very - - - _ Hwy; 100 to France on nodh more slbp,sigris/speed controls stamp. Is there a way to decrease this 4394IMackey Avenue 1 I A 1 1 .. 1, T - None that A am aware of. 1 1 3- 4,- 5 1 1,. - . - side: - .. _ 1 put In place. - 3 slope? (see dl rain an . questionnaire) 1) Crosswalk at Dad 8 44th floods - forcing pedestrians to I would most Eke to get Ad of the power find other areas to doss. Drain race speed particularity from poles and go to underground tallies - on HE section doesn't handle Vlboddale to Browndale - it Is a along 44th. Thera is a yearamund drainage problem accumulation. speedway. Design a safe By for at the intersection of Dan and 44th an recreational bicycle riders to use Some provisions need to be made to the north -west side of that intersection. 2) Bike riders on sidewalk seem the street instead of sidewalk ... or accommodate bicycle riders / auto speed water. Ice, pool over the crosswalk often to have tight of way to make the sidewalk big enough to • without retying an enforcement to keep 4400144th Street West 1 1 1 1 1 4 to S inches deep. 1 2 5 5 1 4 1 1 pedestrians. 1 accammodale both. 1 seed down. . .. • There Its poolrg;an the tide'of Um road - - aftorreins that last focdAys any - - �ometim?s we6ks. There ls i o6 a rtes; -. z bars drive ioo qukkfy end create We do not want is create a(4adway that Pooling in ourhonl yarC•that causes. , - No spevrelk by the parkortMth ; unsafe sMualians,'Trafne calming, encourages Cars to dAyb raster than Oily • 440.1 44th Street Waif - d - 1 t. , �- _ 'T > - _ les N our erB: -_ . 1 ,. ,.. 6 5' . .:,3 '2 t -. '.1f. .. Sheet: uitsafefm kids.. :f- : "(aeasuresareneeiied... • 1 atread do. (e.g.. erroadsi. 4401 Browndale Avenue 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 2 3 1 d 1 1 - Belle, ioress to Robert (Bob) . - Par k. Perhaps a small pa '- - PLEASE:' No parking on south side. The ' lot off 44th St: Also a crosswalk Yes, speeding cars, especially sidewalk on north side would be ' - - Yes, storm water stands an the roadway - � - -_ fiom sidewalk on north side of during moming.and evening appmpriamond'convenient for parking .., ,410514th Street Vkst- i _ ,'_ .._. 1 T _ .1' ' ;1. -i,'. _:- Ghost of our .o6 .... .° f .2 -. 5', .- 4 3 -1 1 44th St. 1 ',.'rush -hours 1 .ed aceirt to sldeJralk- Low spots, bumpy, near manhole Just outside our driveway at 4409, also Excessive vehicle speed from 4409 44th Street West 1 1 1 contacts water. 1 1 1 3 5 1 1 1 Wboddale to Browndale. 1 - We have waterback upin our street- - { - - � ' water poets for days, erodes boulevard - :. Tra ffx goes raster than 30 mph, We need parkng on one site. Does nod - 4412 44th Street West. 1 1 ... I :.. 1 - 1 and smells. .. '. 1 1 5 ,.. - . 3' 4 - 1 1. 1 ,. parking Is undefiled.- 3 matter which one. . Cars trawl 44th at excessive speeds. In excess of 40 mass per hour, sometimes 50. Need traffic 4412144th Street West 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 A 5 ] 1 4 1 1 bumps to contain speed. 5 Assume that curbs are part of project. There is almost ahvays standing water on Probably . A would bike more information on how We _ - 446 Street right In front of our house. it notwiWn - ' wig be assessed. The front confer of our .. r _ collects In a big potholm. This is S. but - .. i !'.. '. _ property Is in Feline, and we pay Edina , - - m particularly probleeOcduMg the spring certainly property taxes on that, but the bulk of - thaw. After a heavy ram and Curing the - within is The street is too narrow 1m an the our lot Is in'S1. Louis Park, and we Bile spring thaw, weget standing watergn the - of the We want to,keep the sidewalks; traffic l gets: Parking on both technically St. Louis Park residents- at 4424 44th Street West 1 1 1 - sldewrbtk.- 1 4 5. 2 3 . road. . 1. This is aial bus SIMI. 1 • -.Sides Of Use sweat... 3 I least that's where we vote. " K:101686.171AwnimDocs11 115100uestionainelBA -363 W 44111 SI Oueslionnaire Tabuletion..ls 1/4/2011 4 01 6 Y. ?01686.17adminlDocsll i 15100uestionsinelBA -383 W 44th SI Ouesrionnaue Tabulation.xls 1/4/2011 S o16 VII. OnStmet L Drainage Service Connection 11. Local Drainage Problems III. Residential Street Lights IV. Private Underground Utilities V. Pedestrian Issues VL Traffic Management Parking VIII. Other Comments Contad Willing to Conned WOing to Conned Favor Upgrading Pet containment Neighborhood Ominne or Footin Drain Has a Sum Pump to C Drain Roof Drains List Local Drainage Problems Street hts Preferred Styles - Lke =5, Dislike -1 Irrigation s . In rlw s hem Traffic Issues? Arlington Routs Returned Imponanl =5, Net ADDRESS Survey Yes No Unkn Yes No Unkn Yes No Yes No Explain Yes No Atom Lantern Coach Lantern Yes No Yes No L'nl eslrian asues. Yes No II es. what and where? Imporlant=1 The new streetlights In the Country Club are very Inadequate. muminate nothing. My present stmetfghts on tan poles are great. Don't know. Present fighting Is very good.. Style, not Important. VMkhever one (light) provides the most light I lumination Is most Inepl. North side seems more logical. We Donl have sidewalk on the north side. I look 4500 44th Street Wrest 1 . 1 t WA I WA know. I 1 1 I 1 I We do not need speed bumps. 3 forward to the new street reconstruction. Neighborho- Wars , c rang get - 4501 44th Street West 1 1 . Y , : 1 - 1 L 1 ':, 1- ., 1 2 . 1 1 - -, . 1' lhroh when, parked on sheets. 1 Comment by street hts: Cheapest 01 We donl want perking in from of our house or driveway as is being done now by our neighbors yam service workers who park In front of our house, block our driveway and trample and urinate on our plantings. Also, we have trouble seeing to Deck out a4nen our neighbors or their 4508 44th Street West 1 1 I 7 1 Sidewalk has panding Issues. 1 2 3 4 4 1 1 1 1 ears are rked on the street. 4606 4401 Sbeet West -' ' f - 1 _.. .. ,. .. 1 . -. - . 1 i 1..,.... 1' - 5 1 - , - t. ., 1 - None that I know of. If we have to have parking in fmnt of our house, we want it on our side. VVa are The mad jogs at the Intersection very Curious to see how you are going to 0144th 6 Browndsle (which Is address the intersection of 44th 6 where 'a five). 11 you widen the Bcowndale. M are already very dose to road to aceonmmodate the 32 -fool the street, and if you widen the mad, matl requirement and the avedool ears win be right on top of us, not to It's very scary to walk along 44th sWewak mquimmenL you wig mention the mad will jog signifleanty Water always collects at the base of our between &owndale and Hwy. create a tremendous jog In the (see 0 VI.B. above). Maybe a solution driveway. We always have a huge 100. It Is also dangerous to mad, which Is not safe for walkers would be to have no parking dose to this puddle after a min because the water cross Brewndale at 44th street (not to mention we'd lose a lot of Intersection. 1 will send a separate o- 4801 44th Street West 1 1 1 1 1 does not drain well at all. 1 2 2 4 2 1 1 because of how the road s. 1 ourm. mall with more comments. .. .' To minkmze street widening. believe consideration should be givento no paring oh entire streef(or only special - ... - segmentlpartcing.bays being provked) If . any parking allowed. please consider - - - peinleml tine designates parking on . _ south side -to create a buffer between - - - _ - traffic stream en0.front yerds'abutlblg - - 1 .. • 'Dangerous' feeling (aid achiai - street' this buffer In essence already safety hazard) walking on - provided, py sldevmlk between Streit and Possibly, -sidewalk on north slde.of mad - yams on noM.skde. - ff - due to Pa grass orgrevol buffer ' Speeding,na1 uneornnlon in - -- ' Not sure Prior serious pooe g (roadbed gmuany reummen r between madcurb and narrow . stretch trrom,BrowndaM to HWY Also;'" arer planning to put In a new how . ' slnkiny� In sUeel.direcly fn hoot of ded/desire ' - sidewalk. from Bmwndale Vilest 1tl0 stop sign: Perhaps speed driveway after comlrudiail Is completed _ - ddsfrellk home (where Coolidge Ts Into 44th, 'd by r to TH W. This even scarler 5mil gosling might help. Like the _ and were advised:that we could recela- -- what h tired enter two tries, by fln -1n msurfaci g city /neigh - _ - when heavier traffic at gyres, double renter fines - rarely n ever a credit for illy riot putting an apron in, 4701144th Street West 1 1. L - enlans from our home an the way to Browndale.. hors 3 > --S 1 1 1 a 1 and moving faster: 1 'have seen any Passing., 1 - which we will appreciate. _ Would prefer no parking where street Is 4705 44111 Street West 1 1 1 1 1 None. 1 3 3 3 3 1 1 None. 1 None. 1 Currently less than 30'. Consider burying power noes, ' A ong street We hope the roadway wig not be . edge& " - - - widened so much as to damage the rain . - etas in garden which drains the driveway. If - - the parking Is mandated, we urge it to be on nearby the south side to offer buffer from rain, traffic .. garden: ' Vide need May 29, 201.1 -Our daughter's wedding - . - - - - to be _ ... .. please. noYnalor construction until after .. functional .. �' - .. • . Some M20 collects stile 31ree1edga�et during Pedestrians are usually famed .. �:- . 'the end -oftAe edweHray, :. paled .. off the sidewalk along. the side'. .. .' Present light "Ch Improved after city . - . „- -._ because „' '.yard 0[4360 Coolidge due to modifleCit last week - something more - Big collection of water at Coolidge & 44N thetain - umrinmled shrubs arts goo! ' decorative would be good too. 470944th Street VWesl_: 1 1 ;,= 1fsouth stile: 1 1 5;3 5 garden is 1. placement of shrubs.1 Some speeding but noRloo Dad. 1 Y. ?01686.17adminlDocsll i 15100uestionsinelBA -383 W 44th SI Ouesrionnaue Tabulation.xls 1/4/2011 S o16 nasponav 0U% low sa% !e% !% a% e!% - 0% OU% 4Z% 55% 43% 57% 7% 93% eU% ZU% 00% 106 Surveys Sent Out 57% 14 °.: 23% 147. 5% 44% 41A 3% 38% 6% 45% 21% 31% 25% 32% 4% 53% 45% 11!5 55% K: 101686. 17V. ai nin,Docs11115100ucslionairrelBA -383 W 44th $n Oueslionnaue Tauulal --ts 1/412011 6.16 VIL On-Street L Drainage Service Connection IL Local Drainage Problems Ill. Residential Street Lights IV. Private Underground Utilities V. Pedestrian Issues VL Traffic Management Parking VIII. Other Comments Contact Willing to Connect Wiling to Conned Favor Upgrading Pet containment Neighborhood Draintde or Footln g Drain Has a Sump Pump to C8 Drain Roof Drains List Local Drainage Problems Street Lights Prate rted Styles - Lure =S, Dislike =l Irrigation Sys. M r/w s tam Traffic Issues? AAington Round Returned Imponent =5, Not ADDRESS Survey Yes No Unkn Yes No Unkn Yes No Yes No Explain Yes No Acorn Lantern Coact Lantern Yes No Yes No List pedestrian issues. Yes No If es. what and where? Important -1 If at a0 necessary, parking lane should be on south side in out immediate area because front of south side houses are already dose to roadway. Keep traffic No issue. Very little walking lane furthest from our front doors. 4801 44th Street West 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 0 1 1 1 done by people in the area 1 Higher speed - 40 mph. 1 Sidewalk on north side as now. ..4901 44th SlieetlAlest a .. x ,.. .,.. :. 1 ..v. .._. ._. _,. .. _..� ..._. . -,l .. .1 .... ,. 1. .. ..>. .. :, ...., r, .. 1 � ,.1 t `�'� •H 5 ed 3 At Speeding- es 4B0] 4dN Street West 1 1 1 1 1 1 ] 5 S ] 1 1 1 end et n' hl. 2 x_. ._. 8720 Weterme Ave nue,... _ _.. ........ ... 1 4 .. kz r. .t,. _... ... ..lac ...., ..._ ;. .. -.. -, ..,r� . _t : �. :.,.... �.. .. ... .. .. . -91.. . _.,:. ...: ... one.kdown _ ,., ,�,..,. t. .. ..3 .;. ,.. ..._ 5.. ,.., 1 • -.-None' .:. Returned 60 15 70 16 9 07 4 3 40 5 48 35 33 121 202 189 170 25 >• 4 56 48 nasponav 0U% low sa% !e% !% a% e!% - 0% OU% 4Z% 55% 43% 57% 7% 93% eU% ZU% 00% 106 Surveys Sent Out 57% 14 °.: 23% 147. 5% 44% 41A 3% 38% 6% 45% 21% 31% 25% 32% 4% 53% 45% 11!5 55% K: 101686. 17V. ai nin,Docs11115100ucslionairrelBA -383 W 44th $n Oueslionnaue Tauulal --ts 1/412011 6.16 July 13, 2010 West 44th Street Area Residents RE: Resident Update Letter Infrastructure Rehabilitation Project West 44th Street Dear Resident: The City of Edina and St. Louis Park staff has initiated the planning process to review the critical infrastructure in your neighborhood on West 44th Street, from France Avenue to Highway 100. This review typically includes major items such as the sanitary sewer system, water system, storm sewer system, and the roadway system. You may have noticed City staff gathering data for the past few weeks. They are surveyors that work out of white vans and pickup trucks with City of Edina logo on the sides. They are collecting data to create a base map that will help us in the design phase of the project. The extent of the project, including the design of the roadway, has not been decided; this will occur with public input. Once the base map is completed the public process will begin - we anticipate this starting in September or October. You will be notified when the schedule is finalized. We realize that there is much anxiety of what will happen; however, we ask that you bear with us until we know what the conditions are of this infrastructure and have gathered enough information to share with you. Sincerely, Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer C: City of St. Louis Park - Engineering Department G:\Engineering\lmprovements\BA383W. 44th St -France to TH- 100 \ADMIN \C0RR \LETTERS AND EMAILS \20100713 BA383 resident update letter.docx October 15, 2010 West 44th Street Area Residents City of Edina and St. Louis Park Re: Public Informational Open House - Thursday, October 28 at 7p.m. West 44th Street Infrastructure Rehabilitation Project Dear Resident: The City of Edina and St. Louis Park staffs are in the process of reviewing the infrastructure along West 44th Street from France Avenue to Highway 100. This review consists of evaluating the corridor, which includes the roadway section, drainage systems, sanitary sewer and watermain systems. Consideration in maintaining the existing roadway widths and preserving existing trees is a priority when evaluating these infrastructure systems. You are invited to attend an Informational Open House on Thursday, October 28, at 7:00 p.m., at the new Public Works and Park Maintenance Facility, located at 7450 Metro Boulevard, Edina (see attached map). A brief presentation will be given shortly after 7 p.m. followed by an informal question and answer session. The presentation will explain the City of Edina's street reconstruction process, the existing conditions of the infrastructure, and what the design criteria might be for the corridor. The actual design of project and costs will be prepared for a second informational meeting to be held in early December. City staff from both Edina and St. Louis Park, along with both cities consultant, WSB & Associates, Inc will be available to answer any questions or concerns you may have regarding the project. Attached you will find a brochure "A Guide to Edina's Street Reconstruction Process ", which is also on our website at: http://www.ci.edina.mn.usIDetportmentsILS-7a ConstructionProiects future.htm. Residents within St. Louis Park can find information on your City's policy's by contacting the City of-St. Louis Park's engineering department. If you are unable to attend and would like more information on the project, please feel free to call Shibani Bisson with WSB & Associates, Inc. at 763 - 287 -7162 or myself at 952 - 826 -0443. Sincerely, Wayne D. Houle, P.E. Director of Public Works /City Engineer Enclosure C: City of St. Louis Park - Engineering Department G:\Engineering\lmprovements\BA383W. 44th St - France to TH- 100 \ADMIN \C0RR \LErrERS AND EMAILS \20101015 Informational Meeting 1 Notice BA383 W 44th St.docx A WSB Engineering ■ Planning ■ Environmental ■ Construction November 29, 2010 West 44th Street Area Residents City of Edina and St. Louis Park 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541 -4800 Fax: 763 541 -1700 Re: Public Informational Meeting #2 - Wednesday, December 8.at 7 p.m. West 44th Street Infrastructure Rehabilitation Project Dear Resident: The City of Edina and St. Louis Park held a meeting on October 28; 2010, explaining the typical street reconstruction process, as well as describing the existing conditions and design criteria for the proposed rehabilitation of West 44th Street between France Avenue and Brookside Avenue. Following that meeting, a questionnaire was mailed to residents to obtain feedback on various components of the proposed project to use in the design process. The next step is to hold another informational meeting to review the preliminary project design, the estimated assessments to your property, and the next steps to move forward with the project. You are invited to attend an Informational Open House on Wednesday, December 8 at 7 p.m. The meeting will be held at the new Public Works and Park Maintenance Facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard, Edina.' A brief presentation will begin shortly after 7 p.m., followed by an informal discussion of the project to address any questions or concerns you may have. City staff from both Edina and St. Louis Park, along with both cities' consultant - WSB & Associates, Inc., will be available at the meeting. If you are unable to attend but would like more information on the project, please feel free to contact me at 763 - 287 -7162. Sincerely, Shibani K. Bisson, P.E. Senior Project Manager cc: City of Edina - Wayne Houle City of St. Louis Park - Scott Brink Minneapolis ■ St. Cloud Equal Opportunity Employer K \01666- 17%Adm1nlD=Q01011291Mormahonal Meeting 2 NaUce BA383 W 44th St (2)AM WSB & Associates, Inc. - Engineering ■ Planning ■ Environmental ■ Construction December 3, 2010 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541 -4800 Fax: 763 541 -1700 West 44th Street Area Residents - Brookside Terrace to Mackey Avenue City of Edina and St. Louis Park Re: Public Informational Meeting - Wednesday, December 8 at.7 p.m. West 44th Street Infrastructure Rehabilitation Project Dear Resident: The City of Edina and St. Louis Park are proposing a street rehabilitation project along West 44th Street between France Avenue and Brookside Terrace. A bituminous mill and overlay is proposed between Brookside Terrace and Mackey Avenue. This involves grinding up 2- inches of the pavement and replacing it with a new layer of bituminous pavement. The existing curb will remain intact and will not be replaced with the project. The project also includes replacing portions of the sidewalk between Thielen Avenue and Mackey Avenue to provide a 1 -2 foot separation from the existing curb to the edge of the sidewalk. Your property is not proposed to be specially assessed for these improvements. You are invited to attend an Informational Open House on Wednesday, December 8 at 7 p.m to review the preliminary project design and the next steps to move forward with the project. The meeting will be held at the new Public Works and Park Maintenance Facility located at 7450 Metro Boulevard, Edina. A brief presentation will begin shortly after 7 p.m., followed by an informal discussion of the project to address any questions or concerns you may have. City staff from both Edina and St. Louis Park, along with both cities' consultant - WSB & Associates, Inc., will be available at the meeting. If you are unable to attend but would like more information on the project, please feel free to contact meat_ 763 - 287 -7162. Sincerely, IA�— - 't, 46�,At� Shibani K. Bisson, P.E. Senior Project Manager cc: City of Edina - Wayne Houle Minneapolis ■ St. Cloud Equal Opportunity Employer C:1Da Hems and SettingebmantepueU —a1 SeninpslTemporaq Ir4emet FikslComent. Oudwl &JGF60GOJ1201011291ntormati —I Meebrg 3 Notice 8=k6i0e to 100 BA383 W 44th St (2).dw Neighborhood Informational Meeting 44th Street (Brookside Ave to France Ave) � ' IDS TYPICAL ''''~"^'^~~~^~-' on RECONSTRUCTION] Video - can also be found on City web site: City of Edl-a CDs CITY OF EDINA Municipal State Aid Streets Edina Municipal State Aid Roadways AGENDA CITY OF EDIw Introductions Typical Roadway Reconstruction 44m Street Information Existing Conditions Design Criteria Communications Preparing Next steps Questions � PROCESS FROM START TO END CITY OF EDINA no Municelpal Appiroval on CITY OF "'"MUNICIPAL STATE AID FUNDIN - 80% of roadway costs funded through Municipal State Aid - "Gas Tax Monies" 20% of roadway costs funded through Special GI o Based on Residential Equivalent Unit (REU) -Each home is an REU -Businesses are assigned REU's based on trip generation. ��� FUNDING CITY OF EDINA Utility Fund - 100% of the following: • Curb & Gutter • Sanitary Sewer- main line only ti- • Storm Sewer- main line only • Water main - main line only • Drain tile - if needed for residents to connect sump pumps and down spouts s SPECIAL ASSESSMENT CITY OF EDINA PAYMENT OPTIONS Payable o o reams A finalspec,al assessment hearing` „ held the fall after the' . project is completed (sometimes one year '1v" later). BOULEVARD AREA: :: CITY OF EDINA (;Property owner items located within the City's right of way may be damaged during construction: • Irrigation and pet containment systems will only be restored if indicated on the resident questionnaire. • Prior to construction, residents will be given an opportunity to remove plantings and other landscape features in the boulevard. b • Boulevards will be restored with grass - regardless of previous planting or landscaping. WHAT DO YOUR TAXES PAY :: CITY OF EDINA Allocation The Portion of Your Property Tax . Ponce that the City Receives City of Edina ' 20% •Fire Parks City of Edina Public Works ema ot1ef Snowplowing Pothole Repairs Seal coating Other Street Maintenance ; RESIDENT QUESTIONNAI aCITY OF EDINA ;The property owners questionnaire generally (gathers information on the following topics: Sump Pump Discharge Service Line? • Residential Roadway Lighting? • Pedestrian Issues - what are the issues? !: • Private Underground Utilities - do you have underground lawn irrigation and pet containment? • Local Drainage Problems - have you noticed drainage issues in the neighborhood? S-2 cis Typical Street Section CITY OF EDINA i W [;Z7 Md F p 1 u 1 1 1' Vrwfw u 1 1 1 1 CITY OF EDINA Existing Corridor Conditio m _.. A Tree Preservation •Tree Lined Boulevards _ -Historic Catalpa trees -_ -Elm Trees Existing Corridor Conditions .. CITY OF EDINA Roadway Built in 1960s Reconstruction in 1984 — Brookside to TH 100 Prevalent cracking & deterioration of pavements '. am Existing Corridor Conditio .;.' CITY OF EDINA Sidewalks -Structurally inadequate -Varying widths Um Existing Corridor Conditio 0 CITY OF EDINA • Maintain existing drainage patterns • Existing system does not meet design standards • Curb and gutter not present or does not meet standards • Pavement edges deteriorating Y- Cis CITY OF EDINA Existing Corridor Conditions Sanitary Sewer • Built in 1940s • Typical issues root intrusion, cracked segments • Infiltration Watermain • Built in 1940s • Watermain breaks —to be evaluated • Service issues — to be evaluated • Water quality — to be evaluated CITY OF EDMA Typical Street Section, 10 CITY OF EDINA Design Criteria; NE Edina Transportation Study • Pedestrian Crossing at Kojetin Park • Parking Evaluation at business area • Lane Designations at France Ave ur CITY OF EDINA Design Criteria State Aid Requirements ■ Min. roadway width 32 feet • 2 - lift through lanes • 1 - 8 ft parking lane • 2 ft clear zone -Parking allowed on one side of roadway ■ Variance needed for "width" -Prevent tree impacts CITY OF EDINA Design Criteria Edina Comprehensive Plan -Bike Plan Ta R­­­ R.1, 16. V •00 CITY OF EDINA Design Criteri Private Utility Companies • Potential gas main rehabilitation • Potential burying of overhead power lines 13111 WHAT CAN YOU DO TO PRE cfrY of EDINA FOR THE PROJ • Begin financial planning for the assessment • Coordinate landscaping, driveway replacement and house remodeling projects with the reconstruction schedule. • Complete questionnaire to provide feedback • Ask questions; inform staff of your concerns • Sign -up for "City Extra" to receive updates via email notification %\ CrrY of EDINA Questions? HOW CAN YOU GIVE INPUT t i•'� CITY OF EDINA AND STAY INFORMED? •www.CityofEdina.com { Visit our website regularly. Information from open houses and other communications are archived on our website. Drop us an email i • 952. 826 -0371 Call us; office hours are 7:00 -3:30 p.m. • Stop by the office Public Works and Engineering Departments 7450 Metro Boulevard • Schedule an appointment 952- 826 -0371 .a CITY OF EDINA 1. Resident Questionnaire • Decorative Street Lighting • Parking • Sidewalk 2. Next Meeting in December • Preliminary design drawings • Estimated costs / assessments Next ➢5 COMMUNICATING WITH YO ®© CITY OF EDINA Our first contact with you is when we Into m you of the infomutional rotating, followed by public hearings notification; open house; surveys; project plans and schedules; and construction update letters via regular mail Our last communication to you is the notice of final special assessment hearing. Public hearings will be published In the Edina Sun- Curronf. t� ouestionnaims will be sent during the early planning stage to help staff fomwlato a dWslon in areas such as s= lighting and style of street lighting. weekty construction updates will be sent via the uCity Extra" email. Stay In the loop by signing up for this free service. Letters may be delivered to Inform you of time-sensftiva events such as water shutoff the east morn in g. 13111 WHAT CAN YOU DO TO PRE cfrY of EDINA FOR THE PROJ • Begin financial planning for the assessment • Coordinate landscaping, driveway replacement and house remodeling projects with the reconstruction schedule. • Complete questionnaire to provide feedback • Ask questions; inform staff of your concerns • Sign -up for "City Extra" to receive updates via email notification %\ CrrY of EDINA Questions? HOW CAN YOU GIVE INPUT t i•'� CITY OF EDINA AND STAY INFORMED? •www.CityofEdina.com { Visit our website regularly. Information from open houses and other communications are archived on our website. Drop us an email i • 952. 826 -0371 Call us; office hours are 7:00 -3:30 p.m. • Stop by the office Public Works and Engineering Departments 7450 Metro Boulevard • Schedule an appointment 952- 826 -0371 .a CITY OF EDINA 1. Resident Questionnaire • Decorative Street Lighting • Parking • Sidewalk 2. Next Meeting in December • Preliminary design drawings • Estimated costs / assessments Next ➢5 Neighborhood Informational Meeting No. 2 West 44th Street Improvements (Brookside Terrace to France Ave) December 8, 2010 ?; ON Project Location — 44th Stre CITY Of EDINA :: CITY OF EDINA Survev Results • Traffic Issues • High speeds • On- street Parking I Survey Results NOT IMPORTANT IMPORTANT 1 AVG. = 2.4 5 Agenda �;; CITY OF EDINA A9 1. Introductions 2. Survey Results 3. Proposed Improvements 4. Costs /Assessments 5. Next steps 6. Questions " [Do Surve Results In i. CITY OF EDINA Y Survey Results - 51% Returned • Upgrade Street Lighting • 56% No 41% Yes • Pedestrian Issues • Need crossing at Park • Sidewalk is close to curb 'Y • Need Crosswalks — Wooddale Ave CITY OF EDINA Proposed Street Improvements] Mill and Overlay Brookside Terrace to Mackev Ave • 2 -inch pavement replacement due to the age (1984) and condition • Partial sidewalk replacement to provide 1 -2 foot buffer • No curb replacement �1 CIA Proposed Street Improvements 0a CITY OF EDINA Street Reconstruction Mackey Ave to France Ave • Complete replacement of road bed • New curb where not present • Curb replacement where deteriorated and where installing storm sewer • Partial sidewalk replacement where deteriorated and to provide 1 -2 foot buffer • New driveway aprons CITY OF EDINA Proposed Improvements , No Parking Brookside Terrace to Browndale Ave Dart Ave to Wooddale Ave CITY OF EDINA Proposed Street Improvements] 00 Proposed Improvements on CITY OF EDINA I Typical Sections No Parking Either Side v.1 —r -T Yrrs� wa) I n.0 L... i Thu ur �ilw 2V 28' Section Proposed Typical Section Brookside Terrace to Browndale Avenue Dart Avenue to Woodale Avenue i 2 ci' Proposed Improvements .,a CITY OF EDINA Parking Allowed on one side (with variance) • Browndale Ave to Curve Ave — north side • except from Dart to Wooddale Ave Curve Ave to Eton PI — ex. south side S ski i - -- -- � a. r oo Proposed Improvements .a CITY OF EDINA State Aid Variance Request • Parking on one side • Browndale Ave to Dart Ave • Wooddale Ave to Grimes Ave • Minimum 32' width needed • Proposed width is 30' • Parking on both sides • Eton PI to west of France Ave • Minimum 38' width needed • Proposed width is 35' CITY OF EDINA Proposed Improvements Typical Sections Parking on One Side Only v.r*.o -r W r- s'- .. W n' t r v.n W..el 5h'd P"np 7 "_ leer T1ru lrf. mw - 32' Section –� Proposed Typical Section Browndale Avenue to Dart Avenue Woodale Avenue to Curve Avenue CITY OF EDINA Proposed Improvements - Typical Sections Parking allowed on both sides 6 11-S •air 11• 71' •6.S 1' -S W_ 1W Wak BMI I P�Itl�y`(` Theo larr - - Thu Lrw. 17 rkft I sNd I vak � 35' Section —� Proposed Typical Section Eton Place to just West of France Avenue Kojetin Park pr CITY OF EDINA Proposed Improvements' .■ State Aid Variance Request • Variance Process: • A City Council resolution and variance request is submitted to Mn /DOT for approval • A committee approves or denies request • Anticipated March 2011 approval �3 Proposed Improvements CITY OF EDINA it I a Proposed Improvements CITY OF EDINA NE Edina Transportation Study • France Avenue Intersection r .-x J11 x f CITY OF EDINA Proposed Improvements Edina Comorehensive Plan • Bike Plan hae....YbdlwYlpwY �,,; .pry Y Mmu anptMnNe y ti . 10 CITY OF EDINA _ vroposed Improvements . Storm Sewer Improvements • Upgrade pipes to meet standards • New storm sewer from Coolidge to Dart Ave • Stormwater treatment structures • Address local drainage issues identified in survey Sanitary Sewer • Manhole and pipe repairs • Currently evaluating system Watermain • Pipe lining /pipe bursting • Hydrant Replacement • Currently evaluating system �4 Costs /Assessments Cm OF MINA Street Improvement Costs Edina Residents • Total Estimated Street Reconstruction Costs $1,150,000 • Assess 20% - $230,000 Spread over 110 Residential Equivalent Units: • (REU's) = $2,100 per REU • Kojetin Park has 9 REUs • Does not include the respective utility funds • Mill and Overlay (Brookside Terrace to Mackey Ave) - No assessment ©cnY of Eaau Costs/Assessments Bury Overhead Power Lines • 100% directly funded by adjacent properties • Estimated Cost - $6,000 48,000 per property • Includes burying of the main line and the individual service connections OF ED CITY aiA Project Contact Information • http: / /www.cl.edina.mn.us /Departments /L 6 -17a_C onstructionPro jects_futu re. htm • http: / /www.stiouispark.org • Shibani Bisson- WSB & Associates 763- 287 -7162 or sbisson @wsbeng.com 0 Costs/Assessments :® Crry OF EamA Street Improvement Costs St. Louis Park Residents • No assessment if State Aid funds are granted WV OF ED NA Questions? ➢5 Next Steps �...:.a CITY OF Ea1NA Project Schedule Feasibility Report Complete ......... January 4, 2011 Public Hearing ..... ........................February 1, 2011 Variance Hearing ... ......................... March, 2011 Approve Plans and Specifications....... April, 2011 Receive Bids ......... ...........................May, 2011 Award Contract ..... ..........................June, 2011 Begin Construction . ..........................June, 2011 Complete Construction .......................Fall, 2011 Assessment Hearing ..........................Fall, 2012 WV OF ED NA Questions? ➢5 ary PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING / OPEN HOUSE 44th Street Improvements Improvement Project No BA -383 City of Edina Thursday, October 28, 2010 SIGN - UP SHEET NAME Mailing Address j •; I" �'D a '77 �yq PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING / OPEN HOUSE 44th Street Improvements Improvement Project No BA -383 City of Edina Thursday, October 28, 2010 SIGN - UP SHEET NAME F Mailing d =s rMIA S. Y' J', �'•f yr- �/ r' d ���� %/Va iii--- ,�--- gg^^^..--- . Al `17 0� W. 'ig6k A,, 41vca, Zla w es PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING / OPEN HOUSE A, 44th Street Improvements owe � Improvement Project No BA-383 C ly City of Edina °• a Wednesday, December 8, 2010 SIGN - UP SHEET A-IV NAME Mailing Address q J t af- Z.i4c-� y r. f 7 S7 .) e W. 7 7 'ft"-- 574-- q yh PUBLIC INFORMATION MEETING / OPEN HOUSE 44th Street Improvements Improvement Project No BA-383 )� City of Edina °•-� Wednesday, December 8, 2010 SIGN - UP SHEET NAME Mailing Address C���� �G -Ia�� u v�► �� �,2 yL /o s W qyA Sf s� ...,r. J- ��lfl�+� j VV • i o �L q312- &DoIc <S- S Szr a 7 AhR z06 wPS T- Shibani Bisson From: Shibani Bisson Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 11:36 AM ro: Karen Ferrara; whoule @ci.edina.mn.us Subject: RE: 44th street proposed project Attachments: Pedestrian Crossing.pdf Hello- We are proposing on- street parking along the north side of W 44th Street from Browndale Ave to France Avenue and it will extend along all of the properties within this area. We are proposing a pedestrian crosswalk located at the property line between your property and your neighbor's to the east. We are also proposing on- street parallel parking bays on the south side of the roadway within the park property. Attached is a conceptual drawing showing pedestrian crossing and parking areas. Please feel free to call me and I can explain what the drawing shows in more detail to you. We are planning on replacing the sidewalk in front of your house. You can view the power point presentation from the December 8th informational meeting at htt]2:// www .ci.edina.nin.us/Departments/L5 ConstructionProjects BA383W44thSt.htm to obtain more information on the proposed project improvements. Please feel free to call me if you have any fiuther questions. From: Karen Ferrara [mailto:kbfer @comcast.net] Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 6:57 PM moo: whoule @ci.edina.mn.us :: Shibani Bisson Subject: 44th street proposed project I live at 4200 W 44th St. (across from Kjoten Park) and I had two questions relevant to my house: 1) the parking for the park will it be on the lot line of my lot and my neighbor's to the east? I do not feel it would be fair that I bear the full brunt of the proposed parking. 2) 1 am assuming the sidewalk in front of my house will be redone, we have been waiting for >5years, it is buckled and has been filled in with asphalt by the city of Edina and looks and is horrible. Thank you for your time. Karen Ferrara 12/17/2010 Pedestrian Crossing Shibani Bisson From: Brian McHugh [brianjmchugh @msn.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 8:07 AM .'o: Shibani Bisson Cc: whoule @ci.edina.mn.us Subject: RE: 44th Street Project - intersection of 44th and Browndale Shibani - Thanks for your prompt response. Sounds promising and we'll study it more tomorrow night. Thanks again, Brian Subject: RE: 44th Street Project - intersection of 44th and Browndale Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2010 15:13:10 -0600 From: SBisson @wsbeng.com To: brianjmchugh @msn.com CC: whoule @ci.edina.mn.us Hello Brian- I do remember speaking with you and your wife regarding your concerns. After reviewing the roadway conditions and obtaining feedback from the residents, we are not proposing to widen 440 Street west of the Browndale Avenue intersection. The curb line along your property would be shifted to the north 1 -2 feet. As a result, parking is not planned to be allowed on either side of the street in this area. We have evaluated the intersection at Browndale Avenue and with additional striping and modifications to the curb lines at the intersection, we hope to make some improvement to the skew as drivers travel through the intersection. I hope that addresses your concerns. .e will have more detailed information at the meeting on Wednesday night and look forward to seeing you there. Please feel free to contact me if you have any other questions or concerns. Shibani Bisson , PE Senior Project Manager / WSB & Associates, Inc. 701 Xenia Ave. S., Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN, 55416 Direct: _763.287.7162 / Fax: 763.541.1700 / Cell: 612.360.1304 SBisson@w`sleng.com www.wsbena.com www.twitter.com /WSBEnaineering This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the addressee, please delete this email from your system. Any use of this email by unintended recipients is strictly prohibited. WSB & Associates, Inc. does not accept liability for any errors or omissions which arise as a result of electronic transmission. If verification is required, please request a hard copy. Please think about the ENVIRONMENT before printing this emall. From: Brian McHugh [mailto:brianjmchugh @msn.com] Sent: Monday, December 06, 2010 1:02 PM Shibani Bisson whoule @ci.edina.mn.us Subject: 44th Street Project - intersection of 44th and Browndale 12/13/2010 Shibani - My wife and I spoke to you briefly at the 44th Street Reconstruction Open House meeting several weeks ago regarding the intersection of 44th and Browndale. As you may remember, we are at 4601 W. 44th, which is the southwest corner of that intersection. We had several concerns that we expressed to you at the meeting. Although I also noted these concerns on our resident questionnaire, I wanted to make sure you were aware of them. Based on my knowledge of the state requirements for this road, as well as Edina's professed goals regarding sidewalks as expressed by Wayne at the Open House, we are concerned that the only way to satisfy both the state and the City is to significantly widen the street in front of our house. Since the City has no right of way on the north side of 44th, that widening must occur on the south side of the street, i.e. at the expense of our front yard. In addition to the loss of our yard, such widening would dramtically increase the jog in the road that currently exists the intersection as 44th Street is not laid down in a straight line. We view this as a safety issue for pedestrians on the north sidewalk, as an eastbound car travelling down 44th would have to swerve even more than they currently to stay on the road. An inattentive driver, or a driver who may skid through that intersection in adverse weather, could potentially run right over the sidewalk and strike any pedestrians who may be present if they did not make the necessary adjustment to stay on the road. We respectfully request that you consider some creative solutions regarding this intersection. Perhaps there would be no parking close to the intersection, which would potentially mean that the road wouldn't have to be 32 feet wide at that intersection. Perhaps the City would be OK with not having a full five foot sidewalk with a buffer near the intersection. Are there other solutions we could consider? I know you are aware of the challenges presented by this particular intersection and we are hopeful that the design will accomplish the City's goals while keeping the impact to residents' lots to a minimum. We look forward to seeing the preliminary design Wednesday night. Regards, Brian McHugh 4601 W. 44th Street 12/13/2010 Shibani Bisson From: Jeff Heelan Deff.heelan @chtechnology.com] Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 8:18 AM To: Shibani Bisson Subject: RE: W 44th Street Project- City of Edina Shibani, Thank you for the follow -up. Hopefully we move forward with the Upgrade of Street Lighting but we'll see where the cards fall. Regards, Jeff Heelan Jeffrey D. Heelan I President I C&H Technology, Inc. 1 6121 Baker Road I Minnetonka, MN 55345 1 800.274.4284 (ph) 1952,933.6223 (fax) I leff.heelan n chtechnolonv.com l www.chtechnoloay.com i ISO 9001 -2008 Please consider the environment before printing this emall message. From: Shibani Bisson [mailto:SBisson @wsbeng.com] Sent: Friday, December 17, 2010 4:31 PM To: Jeff Heelan Subject: FW: W 44th Street Project- City of Edina leff- jCou can now view the power point presentation from the December 8th informational meeting at http:// www .ci.edina.nin.us/Doartment -JL5 ConstructionProjects BA383W44thSt.htm to obtain more information on the proposed project improvements. Please feel free to call me if you have any further questions. Shibani Bisson, PE Senior Project Manager / WSB & Associates, Inc. 701 Xenia Ave. S' .9 Suite 300, Minneapolis, MN, 55416 Direct: 763.287.7162 / Fax: 763.541.1700 / Mobile: Cell: 612.360.1304 SBisson�)wsbeng.com www.wsbene.com www.twitter.com/WSBEnpineerin. This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the addressee, please delete this email from your system. Any use of this email by unintended recipients is strictly prohibited. WSB & Associates, Inc. does not accept liability for any errors or omissions which arise as a result of electronic transmission. If verification is required, please request a hard copy. Please consider the environment before printing this email message. 12/21/2010 Feasibility Study - Appendix W 44TH STREET — BROOKSIDE TERRACE to FRANCE AVENUE �v41�1r.I, o @ c -, 70th Street Improvements , _, ,� City of Edina, Minnesota v a 70th Street Improvements Edina, Minnesota PUBLIC COMMENT CARDS Public Information Meeting No. 1 October 28, 2010 COMMENT CARDS General Comments 1. John & Marcia Jones Thanks for the information you presented this evening and your efforts to keep us informed as we go 4709 West 44th Street through this process. As residents of the southern side of the street for 30 years, we are, of course, Edina, MN 55424 concerned about maintaining a buffer between our home and this traffic. In contrast to the attitude of City engineers in 1984's renovation, we sense that the present staff appreciates the value of maintaining a residential quality in our neighborhood, and we will work as partners with us by applying for variances of the State mandate. We feel that the current width suits us very well. 2. Bruce & Sara Halverson I'm sure you are asked this many times; "Why are our taxes (property) not paying for general street 4903 West 44th Street improvements such as what we will be paying for on 44th Street "? It sounds to me that if this street Edina, MN 55424: (44th) was not classified as a State -Aid roadway, we'd be paying even more. Many of us are retired with a fixed income, and this is an additional burden on our income. We are already paying for the sound wall on Highway 100. Feasibility Study- Appendix W 44TH STREET — BROOKSIDE TERRACE to FRANCE AVENUE gl�1r ow g �=, 70th Street Improvements City of Edina, Minnesota v a 70th Street Improvements Edina, Minnesota PUBLIC COMMENT CARDS Public Information Meeting No. 2 December 8, 2010 COMMENT CARDS General Comments 1. Tom Bray 1. 1 think the level of information and communication is outstanding. 4315 Eton Place 2. 1 still think parking from Eton to France should be one side only. Edina, MN 55424 2. Paul Hofrenning Well run meeting. Parking is very important on the north side of 441h. Houses have a 90 year history 4014 West 44th Street of parking in front of their houses. A 2 -way bike path on 441h with green paint and marked very well Edina, MN 55424 would be very important on 44th. Right now you have a lot of bikers that need a marked path. With that a 25 mph would also be great. If you have any additional questions or comments on the proposed 70th. Street Improvements, please feel free to contact: Wayne Houle, PE Public Works Director Project Manager City of Edina Appendix C Edina Comprehensive Plan Elements Page A-4 of A -32 C. ro ial' bairn r mm� F� bong hulae9s Zoaa corwo"Oi ,i 9Q - ren Edina Comprehensive Plan Update 2008 Submittal approved by the City Council on December 2, 2008 City of Edina 4801 West S& Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1394 Contact: Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager 952 - 8260415 hworthinatonOci.edina.mn.us www.citvofedina.com Page A -5 of A -33 tamwurity Damon Roadway Cwrtdor• - propaaed City of Edina Flpura4.5 ! ' 20M Cnmprehanahro KIM Upelata V'I n— J�uri� Ediva Camp Plan Updatu 2W8 (:t+apfer ,v Zartd Uw un/ Cutrirrrw iV COVVII 4 -40 Page A -6 of A -33 .for.lty(ng, Team( ng, rafslgfumilts• &.doing�tiustness lyt 10Q8 Comprehen�ive!F Table 7.1 - "A" Minor Arterial Roadways Roadway From To Type France Ave. Southern City Northern City Limit Reliever Arterial CSAH 17 Limit Drive, Bloomington) Valley View Rd.* TH 62 W. 66 St. Reliever Arterial 66 In St.* Valley View Rd. Eastern City Limit Reliever Arterial Vernon TH 62 TH 100 Reliever Arterial Ave /Gleason Road CSAH 158 TH 169 E. Western City Limit Eastern City Limit Reliever Arterial Frontage Rd. 178 "' St. /Edina Ind. Blvd.177 "' St. /76 "' St. W. 50 St. (CSAH TH 100 France Ave. Augmenter 21 CSAH 17 Arterial * Please note that another segment or segments of this roadway may have a different functional classification as identified in Tables 7.2 and /or 7.3. All other minor arterials are considered "B" minor arterials, which have the same function as "A" minor arterials, but are not eligible for federal funds. The "B" minor arterial roadways in Edina are identified in Table 7.2, below. Table 7.2 — "B" Minor Arterial Roadways Roadway From To York /Xerxes Ave. (CSAH TH 62 Southern City Limit 31) (ultimately to American Drive, Bloomington) Valley View Rd.NV. 69 W. 66m St. York Ave. (CSAH 31) St.* * Please note that another segment or segments of this roadway may have a different functional classification as identified ln- Tables 7.1 and/or 7.3. Collector Streets. The collector system provides connection between neighborhoods and from neighborhoods to minor business concentrations. It also provides supplementary Interconnections of major traffic generators within the metro centers and regional business concentrations. Mobility and land access are equally important. Direct land access should predominately be to development concentrations. In order to preserve the amenities of neighborhoods while still providing direct access to business areas, these streets Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 - 7.6 Chapter 7. Transportation Page A -7 of A -33 -for diving, learning, raising families & doing business \ 4 36,,08AC'9mprehen$We Plan are usually spaced at one -half mile intervals In developed areas. Collector roadways in the Edina are summarized in Table 7.3, below. Table 7.3 Collector Streets Street From To Blake RdAnterlachen Rd. North City Limit Vernon Ave. CSAH 158 Blake Rd./Olinger Blvd. Interlachen Blvd. Tracy Ave. Londonderry Rd. /Lincoln Dr./Vernon Ave. TH 169 Gleason Rd. Gleason Rd TH 62 W. 78 St. Valley View Road/Tracy Ave. TH 169 Vernon Ave.(CSAH 158) Cahill Rd. W. 78th St. W. 701h St. Normandale R.Nalley View Rd.' Benton Ave. TH 62 (Crosstown) Normandale Rd. /Grange Rd. Benton Ave. W. 50 St. Minnesota Dr. Parklawn Ave. Edinborou h Way Edinborou h Way W. 76 Ste— Xerxes Ave. CSAH 31 Wooddale Ave. W. 50 St. Valley View Rd. 7 St. WJI- incoln Drive TH 169 Maloney Ave. Maloney Avenue Lincoln Drive Blake Road Brookside Ave. Interlachen Blvd. North City Limit 44 St. Brookside Ave. East City Limit Link Rd. /Eden Avenue Vernon Ave. W. 501h St. W. 49 1/2 SF /W. -5- _18 St. France Ave. CSAH 17 France Ave. CSAH 17 W-5-47 St. Wooddale Ave. East City Limit Southview Lane Normandale Rd. Concord Ave. Concord Ave. Southview Ln. Valley View Rd. W. 58 St. Concord Ave. France Ave. CSAH 17 W. 60 St. France Ave. CSAH 17 Xerxes Ave. CSAH 31 Benton Ave. Tracy Ave. TH 100 Hansen Rd. Benton Ave. Vernon Ave. CSAH 158 Hillary Lane /Dewey Hill Rd. Valley View Rd. Cahill Rd. Cahill Rd. W. 78 St. _ W. 70 1h St. McCauley Trail _ Gleason Rd. Vallex View Rd. TH 100 West Frontage Rd /Arcadia Ave. Benton Ave. W. 50' St. Valle Lane /Rid eview Valley View Rd west of Valley View Rd. east of Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 - 7 -7 Chapter 7. Transportation Page A -8 of A -33 ,.:for living,learn_hg,1. sing'familles & dofng business - ) Rb,AB Compe. stye Sidewalks located on State -Aid roads or within the Public School Zones will be maintained by the City of Edina. Typical City maintenance includes snow removal and repair of broken or shifted sidewalks. Sidewalks located on Local /Low Volume Street Zones and Destination Zones must be maintained by the property owners. Bike Facilities In 2006, the City Council appointed the Bike Edina Task Force (BETF), made up of citizens Interested In bicycle Issues and planning. The BETF has overseen the preparation of the City of Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan, which is hereby adopted by reference and included as Appendix T -2. This document provides a detailed Identification of current conditions and problem areas regarding bicycle facilities within the City. It also provides a vision regarding system -wide Improvements to the City's bicycling facilities. It Is the goal of the City to improve conditions for bicycling by reducing hazards and by developing and improving Edina's bicycle transportation infrastructure so as to invite Edina residents, workers, and visitors to include bicycling as part of their dally mobility activities. Bicycle improvements will be implemented to support safe, efficient, and inviting travel for children riding to school and adults riding to work, as well as recreational users. It is hoped that enhancing biking activities will remove a significant number of vehicular trips from Edina's roadway system. The guiding principles for improving bicycle facilities in Edina are as follows: • Improve safety conditions for cyclists, pedestrians, and motorists • Provide safe routes for all ages and ability levels • Improve connections to local and regional destinations • Provide a useful and realistic transportation method within the City • Promote bicycling to Improve community health One of the key tools that will be used by the City to improve its overall bicycling system as outlined above Is a recommended route network as identified in the Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan. This network is provided as Figure 7.11 of this Comprehensive Plan Update. It is divided into primary routes and secondary routes. The City Intends to first focus on Integrating the primary routes into existing infrastructure before proceeding with the secondary routes. Prior to system improvements being implemented in this manner, they will need Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 - 7 -36 Chapter T Transportation Page A -9 of A -33 r...for, living ,learning, raising famiQes $c doing;business 2008 Comprehegsive Plan ■ any construction or alteration of greater height than an Imaginary surface extending outward and upward at a slope of 100 to 1 for a horizontal distance of 20,000 feet from the nearest point of the nearest runway (Runway 17/35 at MSP) There is currently one heliport in the City of Edina. It is located at the Fairview Southdale Hospital. Heliports are regulated through City ordinance. 7.4 GOALS AND POLICIES: TRANSPORTATION The goals and policies provided in this section are based on the policies from the 1999 Edina Transportation Plan, the 2005 Edina Transportation Commission Policy, and current discussions and deliberations by the City. Goals 1. Maintain and enhance mobility for residents and businesses through creation and maintenance of a balanced system of transportation alternatives. 2. Implement a fully multi -modal transportation system that supports the land use vision and future land use plan for managing and shaping future growth. 3. Minimize the impacts of the transportation system on Edina's environment and neighborhood quality of life. 4. Reduce the overall dependence on and use of single- occupant vehicles by promoting land use patterns that allow for shorter vehicular trips and the use of alternative travel options. 5. Ensure that all Edina's residents, workers, and visitors, including those with transportation disadvantages, have viable travel options. 6. Promote a travel demand management program through a coordinated program of regulations, marketing, and provision of alternative travel options. 7. Provide multiple travel options for transit users, pedestrians, bicyclists, and rideshare users, as well as for drivers of private automobiles. Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 — 7 -38 Chapter 7: Transportation Page A -10 of A -33 fortivin g ,dernin , raisin m) NSA doin gbiines 1- Cbrp .ehensive 8. Support attractive and high performance transit service and connections. 9. Manage parking provision to encourage joint and shared use of facilities, ride- sharing (car pools and van pools), bicycle parking, and increased transit use. 10. Provide for efficient movement of goods within Edina, while minimizing the impacts of freight traffic on other trips and reducing negative impacts on land uses on freight corridors. Policies Roadway Design 1. Design roadway facilities constructed In conjunction with redevelopment projects according to the intended function. 2. Upgrade existing roadways when warranted by demonstrated volume, safety or functional needs, taking Into consideration environmental limitations. 3. Emphasize Improvements to management, maintenance and utilization of the existing street and highway system. 4. Design /enhance residential street systems to discourage through traffic and to be compatible with lower speed bicycling and walking. This Includes consideration of traffic calming measures on local streets and, in some cases, collector streets. 5. Design /enhance collector and arterial roadways to minimize through traffic on local streets In the functional classification system, and to be compatible with other transportation modes Including transit, bicycle and pedestrian. 6. Use adequate transitions and buffers including, but not limited to, earth berms, walls, landscaping and distance to mitigate the undesirable impact of high volume roadways. 7. Consider the use of sound mitigating features for residential development adjacent to high volume roadways, and make property owners and land Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 - 7 -39 Chapter 7. Transportation Page A -11 of A -33 ..for living, learnlpgrais)ng f40lj4 4 doing business 2008 Comprehensive Rlat developers responsible for noise attenuation at new developments near high volume roadways. 8. Encourage beautification of local roadways, where appropriate, with amenities such as boulevard trees, decorative street lighting, and monuments. 9. Monitor and address transportation requirements associated with demographic trends, such as an aging population. Roadway Function and Access 1. Provide logical street networks to connect residential areas to the regional highway system and local activity centers. 2. Adequately control access points to the regional roadway system (including minor arterials) in terms of. driveway openings and side street Intersections. 3. Provide access to the local street system (including collector and local streets) in a manner that balances the need to safely and efficiently operate the street system with the need for access to land. 4. Encourage, through roadway design and signage, Intra -area trips on minor arterials rather than the principal arterial system, and promote serving regional trips on the metropolitan highway system. 5. Separate, to the extent possible, conflicting uses on the roadway system In order to minimize safety problems. Give special attention to pedestrian and bicycle routes. 6. Provide access to redeveloping sites using current functional classification and standards rather than the existing access at the sites. 7. Review and update regional and local functional street classification and coordinate with adjacent cities and Hennepin County. Establish subcategory classifications and criteria for local streets if warranted. Revise local roadway classifications when warranted. Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 - 7 -40 Chapter 7: Transportation Page A -12 of A -33 . Aortiving ,.learnitlg,. rats tn&.4milfes & doing 0siness %M&T 2008'Comp lehensfve Plan" 8. Review and monitor citywide traffic volumes, congestion, existing traffic calming devices and measures, accident history, vehicle violation history, speed limits and enforcement. 9. Educate public on vehicle operations Including public relations campaigns that focus on individual responsibilities to each other rather than individual rights only. 10. Review and recommend traffic calming policies and consider traffic calming Implementation where requested by residents. 11. Implement measures to reduce non - local, cut - through traffic In cooperation with County and State efforts by developing a local traffic calming policy to mitigate the effects of cut - through traffic. Identify the origin and destination of cut - through traffic. 12. When requested by the Edina Transportation Commission and /or the Planning Commission, review land use that may impact traffic Implementations. Continue to monitor adjacent community redevelopment and other activity that potentially Impacts the City of Edina. 13. Evaluate and implement measures required for school safety. Roadway Maintenance and Operation 1. Cooperate with other agencies having jurisdiction over streets and highways in Edina to assure good roadway conditions and operating efficiency. 2. Continue the Implementation of the 1-494 frontage road system through ongoing coordination with Mn1DOT, Hennepin County, and the cities of Richfield and Bloomington. 3. Maintain roads by repairing weather - related and other damage. Continue current on -going pavement improvement plan. 4. Use economic and environmentally sound management techniques for snow and ice removal. 5. Replace substandard bridges and bridges that present safety or traffic problems. Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 - 7.41 Chapter 7: Transportation Page A -13 of A -33 ,.;for'living,'learntng, raislgg. families A doing business A008torn hdnsive Plan Parking 1. Review new developments for adequacy of parking based upon need, the potential for joint use of parking facilities and opportunities to encourage ridesharing. 2. Continue to limit on- street parking in and near congested commercial areas. 3. Work with appropriate commissions such as Planning and Zoning to review City Code, Section 850.08 Parking and Circulation to identify parking based upon needs. 4. Address specific parking requirements In small area plans for given study areas. Pedestrian /Bicycle 1. Provide accessibility to pedestrians and bicycles at major activity centers, including necessary storage facilities. 2. Create pedestrian and bicycle interconnections among major generators, with continuity across major roadways and other barriers. 3. Review and recommend construction of pedestrian and bike paths throughout Edina cooperatively with the Three Rivers Park District and Hennepin County. 4. Promote safe walking, bicycling and driving. Promote vehicle driver respect for bicycles and pedestrians along with bicyclists and pedestrian observance of signs and use of designated paths for travel. 5. Support Inclusion of pedestrian and bicycle access planning when upgrading roadways, bridges and redevelopment projects. 6. Provide sidewalks and safe crossings for areas of potential pedestrian /vehicle conflicts, including high- traffic streets, commercial areas, areas with transit access, and in high - density residential locations. Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 - 7 -43 Chapter 7: Transportation Page A -14 of A -33 sy M D fr O D w w Table F-5 Functional Classification System Characteristics for Collectors and Local Streets F -8 Collector Local Criterion Urban Rural Urban Rural Place Connections Interconnect neighborhoods and Provide supplementary Interconnect blocks within minor business concentrations interconnection among rural residential neighborhoods and within the MUSA. Provide growth centers inside the Twin land parcels within supplementary interconnection Cities region and comparable commerciallndustnal Of major generators within the places near the Twin Cities developments. metro centers and regional region. business concentrations. Spacing Metro centers and regional Permanent Rural and As needed to access land uses. As needed to access land uses. business concentrations: Agricultural Areas: As needed in 1/8 -112 mile. conjunction with minor arterials, Fully developed are: 114 - 314 to provide adequate mile. interconnection of places Developing area: 12 -1 mile identified in "Place Connections' criterion. In addition, minor Collectors should be designated at an average spacing of not less than 4 miles. System Connections Sometimes to Interstate To minor arterials, other To a few minor arterials. To a few minor arterials. freeways and other principal collectors and local streets. To collectors and other local To collectors and local roads. arterials. To minor arterials, streets. other collectors and local streets. Trip - Making Service Short trips (1-4 miles depending Short trips (under 2 miles) at low on development density) at low- speeds. Longer trips accessing to- moderate speeds. Longer the collector or collector and trips accessing the arterial arterial network network. Local transit trips. Mobility vs. Land Access Equal emphasis on mobility and Emphasis on land access, not on . Emphasis on land access, not on land access. Direct land access mobility. Direct land access mobility. Direct land access predominantly to development predominantly to residential land predominantly to agricultural concentrations. uses. land uses. F -8 d CD D 0 D W Table F-6 Functional Classification System Characteristics for Collectors and Local Streets Criterion Collector Local Urban Rural Urban Rural System Mileage Suggested federal limitations: 5- 10%. Suggested federal limitations: 20 -25%. Suggested federal limitations: 65.80%. Suggested federal limitations: 63-75% Percent of Vehicle Miles Traveled Suggested federal limitations: 5• 10°%. Suggested federal limitations: 20-35%. Suggested federal limitations: 10 -30° %. Suggested federal limitations: 5- 20%. Intersections Four -gray stops and some traffic signals. Local street traffic should be required to stop. As required. As required. Parking Restricted as necessary. Unrestricted. Permitted as necessary. Permitted as necessary. Large Trucks Restricted as necessary. Restricted as necessary. Permitted as necessary. Permitted as necessary. Management Tools Number of lanes, traffic signal timing, land-access management .l Land-access management Intersection control, culde -sacs, diverters. Vehicles Carried Daily 1.000 - 15,000 250 -2,500 Less than 1,000 Less than 1,000 Posted Speed Limit 30-40 mph 3545 mph Maximum 30 mph Maximum 30 mph Right-of-Way 60400 feet 60-100 feet 50-80 feet 50$0 feet Transit Accommodations Cross - sections and geometrics designed for use by regular- We buses. None. Normally used as bus routes only in nonresidential areas. None. F -9 ' ! LEGEND- RCLXW l" °crud! -- f4uwead 'Jolr ! 'e�Frt�iiMpa'sinideda7F.yy7T.11 :irMIt PIISI-1..q ± Q.%lIk 91t �dVY:rynak s' (� City of Edina Sidewalk Facilities 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Figure 7.10 Page A -17 of A -33 Page A -18 of A-33 LEGEND: -� Foil! 11611 Iho 2� EON COMPf tlhl I .W H�/Olt7pelyY 110 F For� aiMaic Kn;mdrr;antp City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Bicycle Facilities t4� Figure 7,11 Page A -18 of A-33 THE CITY OF EDINA COMPREHENSIVE BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 19 2007 1 K Li fir. EDINA T� son Page A-19 of A-33 I A map showing Iltc rccominendcd network of roures f o r I•:din:is bicycle rrwsporracion nctwurl< is provided Wow, Routes arc classified as part of a Primary nr Secondary netwl,rk; as discussed vat lit: r, Primary mums arc those that more directly pruvide connections n. destinations within a .l outside Edina Regional tootles (the it ':m.Idian Pacific Regional IraiI and the Nine Mile (:reek Regiona I,rrtil) .ur im hulcd a� a high priority component of this Plan. Plan Recommendations: Route Network LEGEND The City of Edina Comprehensives p Bicycle Transportation Plan 11+ I .I : •••• .1. K i G d• 1 I �. i• I, _` Q Is 0 C3 r 1 t , i • �a- �rrz -wr I .� ( h I !+ 144M AMA I i l_ ! t• a ` (• i � ` . I 1 + . 0 ylu } 1 of L. 10 14110151, I ri s \ I -' il r THE CITY Of EDINA COMPREHENSIVE BICYCLE ITRANSPORTANON Pt AN 1 39 Page A -20 of A -33 2.3 General recommendations 'these recommendations should be kept in mind when designing or implementing improvements to surface streets in Edina, Given that bicycles are legal vehicles for use on the same surface roads that automobiles travel on, many of these general recornntendations revolve around clearly and consistently assigning space to automobiles and cyclists so that t6cy may.rtfely and comfortably coexist on @dinar roadways. IMPLEMENT A "COMPLETE STREETS" DESIGN POLICY "Complete Streets" is a design philosophy that considers the needs of all present and potential transportation network users. Complete Streets laws and policies ensure that a conamuniry's roads and streets are routinely designed and operated to provide safe space and access for all users, including pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists and transit riders, and to ensure that they work for people of all ages and abilities, including older people, children, and people with disabilities. Adopting a Complete Streets design policy will help ensure that all street construction and street improvement projects in the City of Edina anticipate and address the needs of cyclists, pedestrians and other users, regardless of whether a particular street is included within Edini's formally designated bicycle route network. Over the long run, embedding this Complete Streets apprtnch into the City's normal operating procedures will do more for cyclists and pedestrians than any one specific plan could. 'this Plan strongly recommends aduption of a Complete Streets policy and design approach as a priority for the City of!i:dina. DEGREASE THE vvIUTH OF AUTOMOHILF LANES Decreasing the width of autonwbile travel lanes can help calm traffic while freeing up valuable road space for bicycle lanes. 'The Institute ofTransportation Engineers OTE), in Cornett Sensitive Solutions in Dej&niug Major Urban %horoughfares for Walkable Communirim, a study sponsored by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), recommends using roadway's ratget (or desired) speed as guidance for the width of travel lanes provided. Mom am COMPLM STttlttT! You can find more resources on complete streets through the following organizations: • Complete the Streets (www.complelestreels.org) • Walk and Bike for Life (www. walkafrdbikeloilife. com) • The Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center (www. pedbike info. org) 421 THE CITY Of EDINA COMPIIEHENSIVt BICYCLE tRANSPORTATION PLAN A complete street provides safe and comfortable space for all roadway users. Page A -21 of A -33 In general (and consistent with AASHTO Green Book guidance), TWII JHRJW $PttRDS;oP TRAWFIC the study rinds 10 It travel lanes are suitable fur local and collector One of the biggest issues affecting bicyclists' (and streets with operating spcMds to 30 mph, while lane widths from pedestrians') comfort and safety Is the speed of 10 to I I ft are suitable for use In arterials with operating speeds to .automobile traltic around them. 35 mph. DESIGNATE AU'rOMOIJILE SPACE Marking the right edge of the automobile driving lane (or "fog line ") can help calm traffic and designate safe spaces for cyclists to ride on. this practice will in fact also increase safety for motorists as it will discourage automobiles from passing on the right, especially on wider roads and bridges. DECREASE AUTOMOBILE TRAVEL SPEEDS One of the factors that most influences cyclists' (and pedestrians') perceptions of the relative safety of a street is the speed of the automobiles that travel there. Streets with higlh speed limits are less welcoming to pedestrians or cyclists. Several streets which could serve as important bicycle routes in Edina arc made less inviting by high speed limits currently in place. Vernon Avenue, for example, is posted as a 40 mile per hour road along sonic of its length. City of Edina Engineering staff and leaders are currently working alongside City Engineers from other municipalities to lower statewide speed limits for local and collector streets to 25 mph. Thesc efforts should be supported and continued. In the meantime. Minnesota statutes currently allow cities and other jurisdictions to lower speed limits to 25 miles per hour without need of any additional engineering or traffic study if a bicycle lane is provided. According to Minnesora Statute 160.263 Bicycle lanes and ways. Subdivision 4: "Speed on street with bicycle lane' "Notwithstanding section 169.14, subdivision 5 , the governing body of any political subdivision, by resolution or ordinance and without an engineering or iray c investigation, mray designate a safe speed for any street or highway snider its authorisy upon tuhich it has establisimil a bicycle lane, provided that such safe speed shall tier be lwurr than 25 miles per hoar. Me ordinance or resolution designating n stair spurt is r.& ivr ruhen appropriate sigrn designating tier speed are erected along the street or highlurt}t to provided by the governing body ' There is clearly a disconnection. between the design speeds of our streets and roadways (how fast cars can travel and still make turns and meal sight distance requirements), a roadway's posted speed limits (how fast cars can legally travel), and that roadway's actual speeds (what motorists actually do). Needless to say, common experience is that for many streets, actual speeds are closer to design speeds than to posted speeds. An effective way of decreasing a roadway's actual speeds is by providing visual cues to drivers that require them to slow down in order to feel . appropriate control of their vehicle. Or, as the Institute of Transportation Engineers recommends In their Context- Sensitive Solutions (CSS) report: " Context- sensitive solutions for the urban environment often fnrrofve creating a sale roadway environment in which the driver is encouraged by the roadways features and the surrounding area to operate at lower speeds." Narrowing travel lanes is one of the most effective tools to accomplish this. Many US cities, including the City of Chicago, now routinely narrow travel lanes down to 10 toot widths (and Chicago does so specifically to free up additional road space to provide bike lanes for cyclists). Narrower lanes do not increase risk to motorists or present any adverse impacts on safety. In fact, they have even been. used in Minnesola highway projects where lack of available right -ol -way and cost constraints made standard freeway lane widths (12 fl) unattainable. Recently completed portions of Highway 100, for example,. include 11. R lanes where space available was limited. Research and experience, Including an upcoming NCHRP report, findthete is no safety advantage to 12 or 11 loot lanes over 1.0 foot-travel lanes where posted speeds are 35 mph or less. THE CI I7 Of EDINA COMPREHENSIVE %ICYCLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN 143 Page A -22 of A-33 SEPARATE CYCLISTS AND PEDESTRIANS Cyclists and pedestrians have different travel characteristics. Mixing both types of users in the same facility increases hazards to both. Designating bicycling space in sidewalks or side paths is not rcconunended as it increases the potential for crashes between bikes and pedestrians, and, by making cyclists less visible to motorists, puts Cyclists at significantly greater risk of automobile crashes. Risk to cyclists is in fact 5 times greater when riding on sidewalks than when riding on a street, even if that street has no bike facilities it all. PROVIDE ON-STREEr BIKE FACILITIES Providing bike lanes invites additional riders and greatly Improves safety for cyclists, decreasing risk to cyclists by half (over rifling in a similar street without lanes). A street with bike hurts is in fact safer to ride on than shared -use or recreational paths (because of greater potential for bicycle- pedestrian conflicts on those paths). GNECK INTERACTIONS BETWEEN rRAFFIC CALMING AND CYCLING SPACE Calming automobile traffic through neighborhoods and commercial areas is an important goal, and one chat brings benefits to pedestrians and cyclists. Sometimes, however, traffic calming measures can negatively impact cyclists, especially if they include physical barriers or changm in road configuration that narrow or remove space that could accommodate bicycles. ()[her options for traffic calming. including painting lane limits and decreasing lane widths can yield the same traffic calming benefits without decreasing space for bicycles. Marking bike lanes on a street is in fact a traffic calming measure because doing so reduces the amount of road space available to automobiles, providing visual cues to motorists chat help decrease average speeds and their variability. All proposed traffic calming measures in Edina should he reviewed for their potential impact on bicycle conditions. 181X11 Wlts1'Y 11111.% WO 0"41ER INDS)t A comparison of relative risk of Injury due to collisions for several types of facilities that cyclists commonly ride on. Median risk is 1.0: Type Risk Index Major streets, no bike lanes 1.28 Minor streets, no bike lanes 1.04 Streets with bike lanes 0.5 Shared -use paths 0.87 Sidewalks and sidepaths 5.32 Source: WiNam Martz, UnNer* of WashlrWO "Survey at North Amerkw Rkycle Comlmlters. N$10 Md Aggregate Results," Transpotwon Research Board. Vol 1518, 1991. Some traffic calming measures that physically narrow the roadway make It more difficult for cyclists to arrive at an Intersection and be noticed by automobiles before entering It. Using paint to channel traffic preserves space for cyclists and is cheaper, too. Pictured: 65th Street, near Valley View Road. 441 THE CITY OF E04NA COMPREHENSIVE BICYCLE TRANSP097ATION PLAN Page A -23 of A -33 i Avf tm !i Wooddale Avenuc presently provides a comfortable bicycling environment. A pleasant street going through residential neighborhoods, it provides convenient access to 58th, 50th and 44th Street. RECOMMENDED TREATMENTS Given present automobile speeds, traffic volumes and cyclist use of this important route, a pair of 5 ft bicycle lanes is rccommended. Ilowever, given existing provision of oo- street parking and other space constraints, the following arc recommended: SHORT I IMMEDIATE TERM • Sign the route using recommended design • Consider removing on- street parking MEDIUM TERM • Stripe two 5 ft wide bicycle Lutes 44ni 5Iitu f 44th Street presents pleasant cycling conditions today. It connects Brookside Avenuc to commercial nodes at 44th and France and further cast in Minneapolis. Automobile traffic moves at a reasonable pace, and although the geometry of the road Is relatively narrow, sufficient space is available to accommodate cyclists. `there is sporadic use of on- street parking. Mature trees grow adjacent to the existing curb. The gutter - pavement joint is in nerd of repair For some of this street's length. RLCOMMENDEO TREATMENTS SHORT / IMMEDIATE TERM • Sign the route using recommended. design • Repair curb- paveulenl joints. • Consider removing on- street parking MEDIUM TERM • Stripe two 5 ft wide bicycle Lutes Wooddole Avemie today. Along 44th Street today. A potential cross - section for 44th Street. THE CITY Of EDINA COMPREHENSIVE BICYCLE rRANSPORTAtION PLAN I SS Page A -24 of A -33 Appendix D Assessment Policies and Preliminary Assessment Roll Page A -26 of A-32 EDINA CITY COUNCIL POLICY POLICY: Municipal State Aid Designated Roadways Special Assessment Policy DATE APPROVED BY COUNCIL: December 21, 2010 POLICY PURPOSE: Establish an assessment policy for Municipal State Aid designated roadways. POLICY: 1. Cost of Municipal State Aid (MSA) Street Curb and Gutter will be financed by either MSA funds or by the Storm Water Utility Fund. 2. Street Reconstruction Costs (excluding curb and gutter) on MSA streets should be assessed at 20 percent of the cost. 3. The assessable unit for Municipal State Aid street projects shall be based on the residential equivalent unit (REU) per Lot rather than the front footage of the lot. REUs will be prorated to parcels based on trip generation for the land uses relative to the typical single - family residential land use. Non - single family or other mixed -use developments should be evaluated for each project based on the following factors - trip generation of the site, access to the site, unique trip generation or other special circumstances. 4. If a corner lot is subject to multiple street reconstruction assessments, the total assessable cost should be the equivalent to 1 residential equivalent unit. The address of the lot shall determine if the corner lot is assessed at 1, 1/3, 2/3, or 0 REU's for that project: • If the address of the lot is on the roadway being reconstructed and no previous roadway assessments have been levied for that lot, the REU shall he 1 REU. • If the address of the lot is on the roadway being constructed and a roadway assessment has been levied previously for that lot, the REU shall be 2/3 REU. • If the address of the lot is not on the roadway being constructed, but the side or rear yard is and no previous roadway assessment has been levied for that lot, the REU shall be 1/3 REU. • If the address of the lot is not on the roadway being constructed, but the side or rear yard is and a roadway assessment has previously been levied for that lot of 1 REU, the REU shall be 0 REU. 5. Lots subject to multiple assessments cannot be treated differently than lots subject to a single assessment. 6. Capitalized interest, engineering costs, and other project related costs shall reflect the costs that have been incurred for that particular Improvement project. All engineering costs and other project related costs shall be directly related to that particular improvement project. Capitalized interest is the cost of funds used to finance the project construction until the adoption of the resolution imposing the special assessment. 7. Payback of special assessments: a. The term of special assessment shall be 10 years. b. Assessment Interest Rate - The interest rate for a special assessment shall be 2% higher than the true interest "net interest" rate of the bonds that have been issued for the project. If a bond is not issued for a project then the interest rate shall be 2% higher than the true interest rate of the most recent bonds sold by the City prior to ordering the public improvement. c. The City will accept both partial pre - payments and full pre - payments on assessments before certifying the assessment to the County. For ease of administration, a minimum of 25% of the assessable cost must be applied for a partial payment. d. Hardship deferral for seniors, disabled or military persons will be accepted as a repayment. e. Payments shall be amortized using a level principal declining total payment schedule. 8. The new policy will not be retroactive to projects that have already been assessed. Background: A. Municipal State Aid Special Assessment Policy dated December 5, 2006 B. Special Assessment Policy dated September 7, 2010 g:\ engineering \assessments \policy \2010 assessment policy \final policy n background \20100907 special assessment policy.docx PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTS BA 383 WEST 44TH STREET PROJECT STREET PID A TAX PAYER NAME TAXPAYER ADDRESS ASSESSABLE REU NOTES STREET NO STREET NAME CITY Y ZIP ACCESS PTS FROM SITE ACCESS TO ROADWAY GROSS BLDG AREA (GBA) TOTAL REU TOTAL ASSESSMENT COST 44TH ST W 0702824440077 KENNETH C DURR 3916 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 56424 $ ASSESSED UNDER 4388 FRANCE AVE 0702824440075 KENNETH C DURR 3918 44TH ST W EDINA $ ASSESSED UNDER 4388 FRANCE AVE 0702824440128 MAP INVESTORS LLC 3919 3920 44TH ST W 44TH ST W EDINA EDINA 55424 55424 1 1 3624 5.44 1 $ 11,696.31 $ 2,151.64 Business (REU 1.5 per 1000 gross sf) 0702824440081 _ LYSA T. NGUYEN & BRUCE E KORNFELD 0702824440083 DAWN M. URBIE 3924 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824440130 44TH ST PROFESSIONAL BLD LLC 3925 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 3 3 2216 3.32 $ 7,148.82 Business (REU 1.5 per 1000 gross sf) 0702824440082 RICARD NASSER 3930 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824440085 LAURINE J FORD 3936 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824440131 SOLVEIG WESTBY 3945 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 _ 1.6 $ 3,442.62 2 unit Duplex 0702824440132 GREEN -GOLD LLC 4001 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1.6 $ 3,442.62 2 unit Duplex 0702824440102 VIRGINIA R MEARS 4004 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824440133 FRANK A LUCCHESI 4005 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1.6 $ 3,442.62 2 unit Duplex 0702824440106 NEAL W & LEE A FEHRENBACH 4006 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824440107 COLLETTE ANN MORGAN 4008 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824440108 DARRYL C 8 MARY E KNUTSON 4010 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824440001 LLOYD FLYNN 4011 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824440110 RONALD L & MARSHA L P8-EGAARD 4012 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824440109 PAUL G HOFRENNING 4014 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,161.64 0702824440002 KELLY A & BENJAMIN A HART 4015 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824440112 LAWRENCE J & JANE E WILLIAMS 4016 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824440111 L E TANAKA & J E SKIBBE _ 4018 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824440113 STUART & JEANNE ABRAHAM 4020 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824440003 TORA U & BERNARD E ANTOINE 4021 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824440116 HOWARD E & MICHALA C MILLER 4022 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,161.64 0702824430131 ANDREW R 8 LINDA W STOTTS 4100 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824430001 SUSAN & DANIEL MICKELBERG 4101 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824430130 TODD & ANNE HINRICHS 4112 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824430129 S W CROSBY & LM STAHL- CROSBY 4116 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824430128 LYNN A HOUCK 4120 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824430002 MARSHA 8 GEORGE BUCHOK 4121 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824430127 ROBERT CASSERLY JR 4122 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824430101 SCOTT W & KRISTI M ANDERSON 4140 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824430003 FRANK N DRAKE 4141 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824430103 JEFFREY & KRISTIN HEELAN 4150 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824430004 CONSTANCE E SOTEROPULOS 4155 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824430104 T JEANNE MC GAHEE 4160 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824430105 LISA A FAGAN 4164 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824430005 SHAWNA & ALEXANDER FRONK 4171 44TH ST W EDINA 66424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824430102 JOHN P & BRENDA F ROCHE 4176 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,161.64 0702824430100 T J FREDERICK & S M O'CONNOR 4188 44TH ST W EDINA 65424 1 $ 2,151.84 0702824430099 WALTER M & KAREN L HINZ 4194 44TH ST W EDINA 65424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824430098 KAREN & THOMAS FERRARA 4200 44TH ST W EDINA 65424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824430007 VILLAGE OF EDINA 4201 44TH ST W EDINA 65424 9 $ 19,364.75 Clty Property - Kojetln Perk 0702824430097 PAMELA & NILS GOKEMEIJER 4206 44TH ST W EDINA 66424 1 $ 2,151.84 0702824430096 BRIAN & JENNIFER KOMPELIEN 4208 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824430013 PHEBE HAUGEN & JAMES GAFFNEY 4209 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824430043 DAVID A KENDRICK 4210 44TH ST W EDINA 65424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824430142 KARA D & BRADY K HALVERSON 4211 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824430044 E T COOPERSTEIN 8 K M OBERLE 4212 44TH ST W EDINA 56424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824430046 SHAUN & CAMILLE FLANAGAN 4216 44TH ST W EDINA 65424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824430011 TERRENCE P BLESSING 4217 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824430047 TIMOTHY & JENNIFER BRILLOWSKI 4218 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824480010 ALAN M. WELECZKI 4219 44TH ST W EDINA 65424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824430082 JOEL & CYNTHIA RACCHINI 4221 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824430081 WILLIAM & NANCY KOSTER 4225 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824430080 JOSHUA T SIMPSON 4229 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 1802824210001 ANDREW & MEGAN GAILLARD 4301 4307 44TH ST W 44TH ST W EDINA EDINA 65424 55424 0 0 $ - $ - ST. LOUIS PARK ASSESSMENT ST. LOUIS PARK ASSESSMENT 0702824340004 CHAOUKI A & ANDREA L KHAMIS 1802824210003 JOHN & KATHRYN STfTES 4311 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824340055 NICHOLAS S BALLIN & JESSICA R BALLIN 4320 44TH ST W ST. LOUIS PARK 55424 0 $ ST. LOUIS PARK ASSESSMENT 0702824340054 GARY HAGER & AMY BLACKMORE 4324 44TH ST W ST. LOUIS PARK 55424 0 $ ST. LOUIS PARK ASSESSMENT 0702824340039 JEANNETTE UPTON PORTER 4400 44TH ST W ST. LOUIS PARK 55424 0 $ ST. LOUIS PARK ASSESSMENT 1802824210004 REBEKAH W 8 DAVID R CROSBY 4401 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 _ $ 2,151.64 1802824210005 GLORIA C & CLIFFORD E WEXLER 4405 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 1802824210006 MICHAEL BROWERISHELBY WINTZ 4409 44TH ST W EDINA 65424 1 $ 2,151.64 0702824340038 COLLEEN CHILDERS - FOGARTY & TERRY L CHILDERS 1 7 4412 44TH ST W ST. LOUIS PARK 55424 L 0 $ - ST. LOUIS PARK ASSESSMENT PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTS BA 383 WEST 44TH STREET PROJECT Date- 11412011 STREET PID S TAX PAYER NAME TAXPAYER ADDRESS ASSESSABLE REU NOTES STREET NO STREET NAME CITY ZIP ACCESS PTS FROM SITE ACCESS TO ROADWAY GROSS BLDG AREA (GBA) TOTAL REU TOTAL ASSESSMENT COST 010ceR2elal9Flnanclal Institutions 0702824340040 LOUIS KIDDERISARAH STANLEY 4424 4500 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 0.2 2 Churches 0 $ ST. LOUIS PARK ASSESSMENT 0702824340020 CAMILLA REIERSGORD 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 0 $ ST. LOUIS PARK ASSESSMENT 1802824210007 ERICA A WEBER 4501 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 -$ 2,151.64 1802824210012 1 MARY E PROESCHEL 4504 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 1802824210008 MARIE L STENGLEIN 4505 44111 ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 1802824210013 SHELDON & PATRICIA SCHWARTZ 4508 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2.151.64 1802824210009 THOMAS A & LINDA J (YCONNELL 4509 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 1802824210014 TERRANCE J WAGENER 4520 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 1802824220035 JUDITH A LAVERCOMBE 4600 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 - 1 $ 2,151.64 1802824220001 BRIAN MCHUGH /SUSAN A MCHUGH 4601 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 1802824220002 JEFFREY WREDE & LINDA WUTZKE 4605 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 1802824220037 SALLY J BULLEIT 4650 44TH ST W EDINA 56424 1 $ 2,151.64 1802824220003 WILLIAM L & KIMBERLY HANNON 4701 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 1802824220004 ALLAN M & DEBORAH D HOROVITZ 4705 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 1802824220005 JOHN W & MARCIA S JONES 4709 44TH ST W EDINA 56424 1 $ 2,151.64 1802824220030 THOMAS KUPPER/MELANIE NOVAK 4750 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 0.33 $ 710.04 1/3 REU based on address 1802824220006 G KELSEY SMITH 4801 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 1802824220007 MICHAEL J & LAURIE K SOLARI 4805 44TH ST W EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 BROOK AVE 1802824220019 CRAIG A & JUDY FREEMAN 4392 BROOK AVE EDINA 55424 0.33 $ 710.04 1/3 REU based on address BROWNDALE AVE 1802824210010 L DANFORD JR & K DANFORD 4401 BROWNDALE AVE EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 COOLIDGE AVE 1802824220029 CAROL B & WALTER SCHULTZ 4390 COOLIDGE AVE EDINA 55424 0.33 $ 710.04 1/3 REU based on address FRANCE AVE S 0702824440073 KENNETH C DURR 4388 FRANCE AVE S EDINA 55410 3 2 10683 10.68 $ 22,985.96 euslnws (REU 1.6 per 1000 gross sir 3 accesses x 2 accesses on W 441h S1) FRANCE AVE S 0702824440134 LINHOFF COLOR PHOTO 4400 FRANCE AVE S EDINA 66410 2 1 4005 3.00 $ 6,462.99 Business (REU 1.5 per 1000 gross at /2 accesses) ETON PL 0702824440091 THOMAS & NANCY BRAY 4315 ETON PL EDINA 56424 0.33 $ 710.04 1/3 REU based on address 0702824440101 INGRID, BERTRAM, JUDITH, & JEFFREY LEMUNYON 4316 ETON PL EDINA 55424 1 $ 2,151.64 MACKEY AVE 1802824220020 MARY JAX ESAU 4393 MACKEY AVE EDINA 55424 0.33 $ 710.04 1/3 REU based on address WOODDALE AVE 0702824430144 D W JONE & D E AUBOURG 4385 WOODDALE AVE ST. LOUIS PARK 55424 0 $ ST. LOUIS PARK ASSESSMENT 0702824340053 J BECKSTRAND & M M HERRMAN 4386 WOODDALE AVE ST. LOUIS PARK 55424 0 $ IST. LOUIS PARK ASSESSMENT Total 109.50 TOTAL STREET PROJECT C $ 1,150,000.00 Total Assessable Cost $ 230,000.00 Tetei Assessabls REU"s $ 106.90 ASSESSABLE COST PER F $ 2.151.64 Current Land Use Class REU Notes Residential - Single Family Dwelling 1 1 Residential -Two Family, Duplexes, Quads 0.5 1 Residential — Apartments, Condom W urns, Cooperatives, Nurseries, Convalescent Homes 0.5 1 Industrial 0.5 2.3 010ceR2elal9Flnanclal Institutions 1.5 2 Public Buildings - City 0.9 2 Public Buildings - Schools 0.2 2 Churches 0.9 2 moms: 2. Per Gross Floor Area 1000 SF 3. All uses allowed in Planned Industrial Development (PID) except offices and reta0. a 11 •her Park A 3p 1� 0 -A swim CO- '0 R At k Jackley Park ?317 3930 79184:88 3936 39 20 3916 4016 4008 - 39 4018 401240046 4 3919 4400 004316 4; 0 0'0 ... - - 0 1 �44. 00 '4010 4010 3 0 4 . ........ 4160 4111 4112 4 402220 22 460 4120 01, 4176 4140 Oil . 1 1W Browndale Park 4188 4150 4 21 4015 .1 4 iioo , A 4206 4194 4164 101 �mi LM 4212 42 08 4NO s4141 1421D 4171 N .... ...... ....... ... 4218 42 6 Skade wbradf-Liii 4201 420� tWW42 , 421, 214217 4229 42 4211 42 2 1201 4 42 '. "0 42 , 6 11201�. 4504%W% -43fl-t"71 4120 410, 7' "05 5 4401 4520 4503 4409"0 !,WO46 4, "Ol 4509 4393 Y192 4750 4390 4650 4600 "Ol 4505 4501 %ij 4601 4805 4301 4109 4705 4701 4605 X tl rodd Park Idina %fill Pond a• y -15 11,51 st ti u % I flev Park- IfPl Mk /1.5)DI A Preliminary Assessments File K \Ul686.1/\GI5\Mapsassess�nt_mapmxa, Uec 16. Zulu J.IV.14 FM Legen 0 750 Feet A W 44th St Project Location 1/3 REU REU Varies WS16 BA 383 1 REU 1.6 REU St. Louis Park Resident January 4, 2011 o Le w �y �8ae REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.G. From: Cary Teague Planning Director ® Action F-1 Discussion D Information Date: January 18, 2011 Subject: Resolution No. 2011 -19 Authorizing Metropolitan Livable Communities Act Grant Agreement — GrandView Small Area Plan ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolution authorizing approval of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Grant Agreement. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: In July of 2010, the City Council authorized staff to apply for a Livable Communities Act Grant for the purpose of drafting a small area plan for the GrandView District. On December 8, 2010, the Met Council awarded the City of Edina a Grant for $100,000. Upon City Council approval to accept the Grant, staff would next work with the Community Advisory Team to develop the framework and process for the drafting the Small Area Plan. That framework and process would then be brought to the City Council for approval. Once approved by the City Council, staff would seek to hire consultants to assist in the preparation of a small area plan. The City has until December 31, 2012 to complete the study. However, we believe that the plan should be completed this year. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution authorizing acceptance of the Grant Grant Agreement RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -19 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITY ACT GRANT AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the City of Edina has applied for and received a grant under the Metropolitan Livable Community Act in the amount of $100,000 for the Grandview Small Area Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the Edina City Council hereby accepts Grant No. SGO10 -136 and authorizes and directs the Mayor and City Manager to sign the grant agreement on its behalf. Passed and adopted this 18th day of January, 2011. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 18, 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of Edina City Clerk DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT PRE-DEVELOPMENT GRANT PROGRAM GRANTEE: City of Edina GRANT NO. SGO10 -136 PROJECT: Grandview Small Area Plan GRANT AMOUNT: $100,000.00 FUNDING CYCLE: 2010 COUNCIL ACTION: December 8, 2010 EXPIRATION DATE: December 31, 2012 METROPOLITAN LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ACT GRANT AGREEMENT THIS GRANT AGREEMENT ( "Agreement ") is made and entered into by the Metropolitan Council ( "Council ") and the Municipality, County or Development Authority identified above as "Grantee." WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes section 473.251 creates the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund, the uses of which fund must be consistent with and promote the purposes of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Act ( "LCA ") and the policies of the Council's Metropolitan Development Guide; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes sections 473.251 and 473.253 establish within the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund a Livable Communities Demonstration Account and require the Council to use the funds in the account to make grants or loans to municipalities participating in the Local Housing Incentives Program under Minnesota Statutes section 473.254 or to Counties or Development Authorities to fund the initiatives specified in Minnesota Statutes section 473.25(b) in Participating Municipalities; and WHEREAS, the Grantee is a Municipality participating in the Local Housing Incentives Account program under Minnesota Statutes section 473.254, a County or a Development Authority; and WHEREAS, the Council allocated a portion of its Livable Communities Demonstration Account funds to a pre - development grant program to help Municipalities implement their community development objectives and comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, the Grantee seeks funding in connection with an application for Livable Communities Demonstration Account Pre - Development Grant Program funds submitted in response to the Council's notice of availability of grant funds for the "Funding Cycle" identified above and will use the grant funds made available under this Agreement to help fund the "Pre- Development Project" within the "Project Area" as described in the application; and WHEREAS, the Council awarded Livable Communities Demonstration Account Pre - Development Grant Program funds to the Grantee with the understanding that the Pre - Development Project described in the application will proceed to completion in a timely manner and all grant funds will be expended prior to the "Expiration Date" identified above. Page 1 of 8 Pages DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT PRE - DEVELOPMENT GRANT PROGRAM NOW THEREFORE, in reliance on the above statements and in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained in this Agreement, the Grantee and the Council agree as follows: I. DEFINITIONS 1.01. Definition of Terms. The terms defined in this section have the meanings given them in this section unless otherwise provided or indicated by the context. (a) Council Action. "Council Action" means the action or decision of the governing body of the Metropolitan Council, on the meeting date identified at Page 1 of this Agreement, by which the Grantee was awarded Livable Communities Demonstration Account Pre - Development Grant Program funds. (b) County. "County" means Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott and Washington Counties. (c) Development Authority. "Development Authority" means a statutory or home rule charter city, a housing and redevelopment authority, an economic development authority, or a port authority in the Metropolitan Area. (d) Metropolitan Area. "Metropolitan Area" means the seven - county metropolitan area as defined by Minnesota Statutes section 473.121, subdivision 2. (e) Municipality. "Municipality" means a statutory or home rule charter city or town participating in the Local Housing Incentives Account Program under Minnesota Statutes section 473.254. (f) Participating Municipality. "Participating Municipality" means a statutory or home rule charter city or town which has elected to participate in the Local Housing Incentive Account program and negotiated affordable and life -cycle housing goals for the Municipality pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 473.254. (g) Pre - Development Project. "Pre- Development Project" means the pre - development project described in the Grantee's application for Demonstration Account Pre - Development Grant Program funds. The Pre - Development Project for which the grant funds were awarded must be undertaken within the Project Area. The Pre - Development Project may recognize or acknowledge regional park lands and regional trails that cross through or are located adjacent to the Project Area, but the Pre - Development Project may not include regional park lands. (h) Project Area. "Project Area" means the specific geographic area for which the Pre - Development Project will be conducted as described in the Grantee's application. The Project Area must be located within a "developed area," a "developing area," or a "rural growth center" as those terms are defined in the Council's Metropolitan Development Guide. The Project Area cannot include regional park lands, The Project Area may include regional trails that cross through or are located adjacent to the Project Area, but the Pre - Development Project may not provide for the alteration or elimination of any regional trails. Page 2 of 8 Pages �i DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT PRE-DEVELOPMENT GRANT PROGRAM II. GRANT FUNDS 2.01. Total Grant Amount. The Council will grant to the Grantee the "Grant Amount" identified at Page 1 of this Agreement which shall be fund_ s from the Livable Communities Demonstration Account of the Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the Grantee understands and agrees that any reduction or termination of Livable Communities Demonstration Account grant funds made available to the Council may result in a like reduction in the Grant Amount made available to the Grantee. 2.02. Local Funding Match. The Grantee must provide a local match contribution that equals at least twenty -five percent (25 %) of the Grant Amount identified at Page 1 of this Agreement. The local match contribution may be one or more of the following: cash; in -kind staff services, if the staff time is specifically allocated to conducting or completing grant- eligible Pre - Development Project activities; or cash or in -kind contributions from partners that are specific to grant - eligible Pre - Development Project activities. Local match contributions must cover grant - eligible Pre - Development Project activities, and they must be contributed after the date of the Council Action and before the Expiration Date identified at Page 1 of this Agreement. The local match contribution may be allocated among different grant- eligible activities of the Pre- Development Project. 2.03. Authorized Use of Grant Funds. The Grant Amount made available to the Grantee under this Agreement shall be used only for the purposes and activities described in the application for Livable Communities Demonstration Account. Pre - Development Grant Program funds. A Pre - Development Project summary that describes eligible uses of the grant funds as approved by the Council is attached to and incorporated into Ns, Agreement as Attachment A. Grant funds must be used to fund the initiatives specified in Minnesota, Statutes section 473.25(b), in a Participating Municipality. Grant funds must be used for costs directly associated with the Pre - Development Project activities for which the Council awarded grant funds and shall not be used for: land acquisition, demolition, infrastructure, or construction costs; administrative overhead; project coordination costs; travel expenses, food or beverages; legal fees; insurance; bonds; permits, licenses or authorization fees; costs associated with preparing other grant proposals; operating expenses, other than staff time used as in -kind local match contributions; planning costs, including comprehensive planning costs; prorated lease and salary costs; and marketing expenses. Grant funds may not be used for Pre - Development Project costs that occurred prior to the grant award. Grant funds also shall not be used by the Grantee or others to supplant or replace: (a) grant or loan funds obtained for the Pre - Development Project from other sources; or (b) Grantee contributions to the Pre - Development Project, including financial assistance or other resources of the Grantee. The Council shall bear no responsibility for cost overruns which may be incurred by the Grantee or others in the implementation or performance of the Pre - Development Project activities. The Grantee agrees to comply with any "business subsidy" requirements of Minnesota Statutes sections 116J.993 to 116J.995 that apply to the Grantee's expenditures or uses of the grant funds. 2.04. Restrictions on Loans. The Grantee shall, not use the grant funds to make loans to any subgrantee or subrecipient, and the Grantee shall not permit any subgrantee or subrecipient to use the grant funds for loans to any subrecipient at' any tier. The requirements of this Section 2.04 shall be included in all subgrants. Page 3 of 8 Pages e �1- DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT PRE-DEVELOPMENT GRANT .PROGRAM 2.05. Pre - Development Project Changes. The Grantee must promptly inform the Council in writing of any significant changes to the Pre - Development Project for which the grant funds were awarded, as well as any potential changes to the grant - funded activities described in Attachment A. Failure to inform the Council of any significant changes to the Pre - Development Project or significant changes to grant - funded Pre - Development Project activities, and use of grant funds for ineligible or unauthorized purposes, will jeopardize the Grantee's eligibility for future LCA awards. Grant funds will not be disbursed prior to Council approval of significant changes to either the Pre - Development Project or the grant - funded activities described in Attachment A. 2.06. Budget Variance. A variance of twenty percent (20 %) in the budget amounts for grant - funded activities identified in Attachment : A shall be considered acceptable without Council approval, provided no budget amount for any individual grant- funded activity may be increased or decreased by more than twenty percent (20 %) from the budget amount identified in Attachment A. The Grantee must inform the Council of any budget variances. Budget variances for any individual grant - funded activity identified in Attachment A exceeding twenty percent (20 %) will require approval of the governing body of the Metropolitan Council. Notwithstanding the aggregate or net effect of any variances, the Council's obligation to provide grant funds under this Agreement shall not exceed the Grant Amount identified at Page 1 of this Agreement. 2.07. Loss of Grant Funds. The Grantee agrees,to-remit to the Council in a prompt manner: any unspent grant funds, including any grant funds that are not expended prior to the Expiration Date identified at Page 1 of this Agreement; any., grant funds that are not used for the authorized purposes; and any interest earnings described in Section 2.09 that are not used for the purposes of implementing the Pre - Development Project activities described in Attachment A. For the purposes of this Agreement, grant funds are "expended" prior to the Expiration Date if the Grantee pays or is obligated to pay for expenses of eligible Pre - Development Project activities that occurred prior to the Expiration Date and the eligible expenses were incurred prior to the Expiration Date. Unspent or unused grant funds and other funds remitted to the Council shall revert to the Council's Livable Communities Demonstration Account for distribution through application processes in future Funding Cycles or as otherwise permitted by law. 2.08. Payment Request Forms and Disbursements. The Council will disburse grant funds in response to written payment requests submitted by the Grantee and reviewed and approved by the Council's authorized agent. Written payment requests shall be made using payment request forms, the form and content of which will be determined by the Council. Payment request and other reporting forms are available online at: hitp: / /www.merrocouncil.org/ services /livcomm/LCAresources.him. The Council will disburse grant funds on a reimbursement basis or a "cost incurred" basis. The Grantee must provide with its written payment requests documentation that shows grant - eligible Pre - Development Project activities actually have been completed. The Grantee must provide documentation of the local match contribution required under Section 2.02. Subject to verification of each payment request form (and its documentation) and approval for consistency with this Agreement, the Council will disburse a requested amount to the Grantee within two (2) weeks after receipt of a properly completed and documented payment request form. 2.09. Interest Earnings. If the Grantee earns any interest or other income from the grant funds received from the Council under this Agreement, the Grantee will use the interest earnings or Page 4 of 8 Pages �GJ �. DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT PRE- DEVE.LOPNIgN'T GRANT PROGRAM income only for the purposes of implementing the Pre - Development Project activities described in Attachment A. III. ACCOUNTING, AUDIT AND REPORT REQUIREMENTS 3.01. Accounting and Records. The Grantee agrees to establish and maintain accurate and complete accounts and records relating to the receipt and expenditure of all grant funds received from the Council. Notwithstanding the expiration and termination provisions of Sections 4.01 and 4.02, such accounts and records shall be kept and maintained by the Grantee for a period of six (6) years following the completion of the Pre - Development Project activities described in Attachment A or six (6) years following the expenditure of the grant funds, whichever occurs earlier. Accounting methods shall be in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. 3.02. Audits. The above accounts and records of the Grantee shall be audited in the same manner as all other accounts and records of the Grantee are audited and may be audited or inspected on the Grantee's premises or otherwise by individuals or organizations designated and authorized by the Council at any time, following reasonable notification to the Grantee, for a period of six (6) years following the completion of the Pre - Development Project activities or six (6) years following the expenditure of the grant funds, whichever occurs earlier. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes section 16C.05, subdivision 5, the books, records, documents and accounting procedures and practices of the Grantee that are relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by the Council and either the Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six (6) years. 3.03. Report Requirements. The Grantee will submit to the Council written semi - annual progress reports on the Pre - Development Project activities described in Attachment A and the expenditures of the grant funds. The Grantee also must complete and submit to the Council a written final progress report. The final progress report must be submitted with the final payment request form or within 120 days after the expiration.or termination of this Agreement, whichever occurs earlier. Within 120 days after the Expiration Date, the Grantee must complete and submit to the Council a certification of expenditures of funds form signed by the Grantee's chief financial officer or finance director. The form and content of the progress reports and the certification form will be determined by the Council. These reporting requirements shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. IV. AGREEMENT TERM 4.01. Term. This Agreement is effective upon execution of the Agreement by the Council. Unless terminated pursuant to Section 4.02, this Agreement expires on the "Expiration Date" identified at Page 1 of this Agreement. The Expiration Date may not be extended by amendment or otherwise. ALL GRANT FUNDS NOT EXPENDED BY THE GRANTEE PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION DATE SHALL REVERT TO THE COUNCIL. 4.02. Termination. This Agreement may be terminated by the Council for cause at any time upon fourteen (14) calendar days' written notice to the Grantee. Cause shall mean a material breach of this Agreement and any amendments of this Agreement. If this Agreement is terminated prior to the Expiration Date, the Grantee shall receive payment on a pro rata basis for eligible Pre - Development Project activities described in Attachment A that have been completed prior to the termination. Termination of this Agreement does not alter the Council's authority to recover grant Page 5 of 8 Pages -/ DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT PRE- DEVELOPMENT GRANT PROGRAM funds on the basis of a later audit or other review, and does not alter the Grantee's obligation to return any grant funds due to the Council as a result of later audits or corrections. If the Council determines the Grantee has failed to comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the applicable provisions of the Metropolitar Livable Communities Act, the Council may take any action to protect the Council's interests and may refuse to disburse additional grant funds and may require the Grantee to return all or part of the grant funds already disbursed. 4.03. Amendments. The Council and the Grantee may amend this Agreement by mutual agreement. Amendments of this Agreement shall be effective only on the execution of written amendments signed by authorized representatives of the Council and the Grantee. V. GENERAL PROVISIONS 5.01. Equal Opportunity. The Grantee agrees ' it will not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, membership or activity in a local civil rights commission, disability, sexual orientation or age and will take affirmative action to insure applicants and employees are treated equally with respect to all aspects of employment, rates of pay and other forms of compensation, and selection for training. 5.02. Conflict of Interest. The members, officers and employees of the Grantee shall comply with all applicable state statutory and regulatory conflict of interest laws and provisions. 5.03. Liability. Subject to the limitations provided in Minnesota Statutes chapter 466, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the Grantee shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Council and its members, employees and agents from and against all claims, damages, losses and expenses, including but not limited to attorneys' fees, arising out of or resulting from the conduct or implementation of the Pre - Development Project activities funded by this grant, except to the extent the claims, damages, losses and expenses arise from the Council's own negligence. Claims included in this indemnification include, without limitation, any claims asserted pursuant to the Minnesota Environmental Response and Liability Act (MERLA), Minnesota Statutes chapter 11513, the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA) as amended, United States Code, title 42, sections 9601 et seq., and the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) as amended, United States Code, title 42, sections 6901 et seq. This obligation shall not be construed to negate, abridge or otherwise reduce any other right or obligation of indemnity which otherwise would exist between the Council and the Grantee. The provisions of this section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement. This indemnification shall not be construed as a waiver on the part of either the Grantee or the Council of any immunities or limits on liability provided by Minnesota Statutes chapter 466, or other applicable state or federal law. 5.04. Acknowledgments. The Grantee shall acknowledge the financial assistance provided by the Council in promotional materials, press releases, reports and publications relating to the Pre - Development Project. The acknowledgment should contain the following or similar language: Funding support for this project was provided by the Metropolitan Council Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund. Page 6 of 8 Pages .1 DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT PRE-DEVELOPMENT GRANT PROGRAM 5.05. Permits, Bonds and Approvals. The Council assumes no responsibility for obtaining any applicable local, state or federal licenses, permits, bonds, authorizations or approvals necessary to perform or complete any Pre- Development Project activities described in Attachment A. 5.06. Subgrantees, Contractors and Subcontractors. The Grantee shall include in any subgrant, contract or subcontract for Pre - Development Project activities appropriate provisions to ensure subgrantee, contractor and subcontractor compliance with all applicable state and federal laws and this Agreement. Along with such prdvisions.,the Grantee shall require that contractors and subcontractors performing work covered by this grant comply with all applicable state and federal Occupational Safety and Health Act regulations. 5.07. Stormwater Discharge and Water Management Plan Requirements. To the extent appropriate, the Pre - Development Project should include consideration of stormwater discharge and water management plan requirements in federal and state laws, the Council's 2030 Water Resources Management Policy Plan and the local water management plan(s) for the jurisdiction(s) within which the Project Area is located. 5.08. Authorized Agent. Payment request forms; written progress reports and correspondence submitted to the Council pursuant to this Agreement shall be directed to: Metropolitan Council Attn: LCA Grants Administration 390 Robert Street North Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 -1805 5.09. Non - Assignment. Minnesota Statutes section 473.253, subdivision 2 requires the Council to distribute grant funds to eligible "municipalities;'.' metropolitan-area counties or "development authorities" for projects in municipalities particip4ting in the Local Housing Incentives Account program. Accordingly, this Agreement is not assignable and shall not be assigned by the Grantee. 5.10. Warranty of Legal Capacity. The individuals signing this \Agreement on behalf of the Grantee and on behalf of the Council represent and warrant on the Grantee's and the Council's behalf respectively that the individuals are duly authorized to execute this Agreement on the Grantee's and the Council's behalf respectively and that this Agreement constitutes the Grantee's and the Council's valid, binding and enforceable agreements. Page 7 of 8 Pages DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT P.RE- DEVELOPMENT GRANT PROGRAM IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantee and the Council have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives. This Agreement is effective on the date of final execution by the Council. CITY OF EDINA By: Scott Neal Title: City Manager Date: By: Title: Date: Approved as to form: LCDATEMPLATEPREDEV 2010 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL In Guy Peterson, Director Community Development Division Date: 12/14/10 i Page 8 of 8 Pagesii, r ATTACHMENT A APPLICATION FOR LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT PRE- DEVELOPMENT GRANT PROGRAM FUNDS This attachment comprises this page and the succeeding page(s) which contain(s) a summary of the Pre - Development P roject described in the application for Livable Communities Demonstration Account grant funds submitted in response to the Council's notice of availability of Demonstration Account Pre - Development Grant Program funds for the Funding Cycle identified at Page 1 of this Agreement. The summary reflects the Pre - Development Project activities for which the Grantee was awarded grant funds by the Council Action, and may reflect changes in Pre - Development Project funding sources, changes in funding amounts, or minor changes in the proposed Pre - Development Project that occurred subsequent to application submission. The application is incorporated into this Agreement by reference and is made a part of this Agreement as follows. If the application or any provision of the application conflicts with or is inconsistent with the Council Action, other provisions of this Agreement, or the Pre - Development Project summary contained in this Attachment A, the terms, descriptions and dollar amounts reflected in the Council Action or contained in this Agreement and the Pre - Development Project summary shall prevail. For the purposes of resolving conflicts or inconsistencies,, the order of precedence is: (1) the Council Action; (2) this Agreement; (3) the Pre - Development Project summary; and (4) the grant application. C PROJECT SUMMARY SGO10 -136 Applicant: City of Edina Type: Pre- Development Project Name: Grandview Small Area Plan Project Location: Vernon Avenue and TH 100 Council District: 5 — Polly Bowles Project Description: In April 2010, the City of Edina prepared a Small Area Guide Plan Study through the use of a Community Advisory Team (CAT) that included a group of residents, as well as business and property owners. The CAT developed a set of guiding principles for the larger Grandview District to steer future redevelopment and investments in the District. The CAT made a set of recommendations to the City Council regarding the current and future use of the district, including the future use of the Public Works site, which was abandoned by the City in August 2010 when construction on the new Public Works Facility was completed. The CAT reached consensus on a number of issues, including the importance of continued mixed -use development, the future use of the current heavy rail corridor for transit, and the careful incorporation of public green space into any final redevelopment. The CAT also recommended that the current business and commercial mix remain in place as important economic and community benefits for the immediate area. The district is also home to the Edina Public Schools transportation facility for school buses. The long- term goal would be to relocate that facility to free up the current site for redevelopment. There are significant economic challenges for the school district in attaining this goal; an important aspect of any small area plan would be a comprehensive financial and market analysis to assist in determining solutions. Funding: Amount requested: $100,000 Amount awarded: $100,000 Amount . Requested . Amount 'Awarded Y: Use of Funds :. Scheduled Completion . Date- $25,000 $25,000 Transportation analysis and plan 04/2011 10,000 10,000 Community needs analysis 05/2011 10,000 10,000 Market analysis 06/2011 20,000 20,000 Redevelopment phasing plan 08/2011 15,000 15,000 Public participation plan 12/2011 20,000 20,000 1 Financial analysis of redevelopment plan 06/2011 $100,000 $100,000 � -P o� e y f��flYOYV�S6�� lAAA REPORURECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.H From: SHERRY ENGELMAN COMMUNITY HEALTH ADMIN ® ❑ Action Discussion Information Date: JANUARY 18, 2011 Subject: RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -20 AMENDING PUBLIC RESPONSE(PHER)GRANT HEALTH EMERGENCY ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2011 -20 amending the 2010 Public Health Emergency Response Grant (PHER) Agreement with Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) to accept an additional $22,576 to respond to Influenza A (H1 N1) and other outbreaks of influenza virus. INFORMATION/BACKGROUND- The intent of the PHER Grant, which began in 2009, is to prepare for and respond to ongoing and emerging outbreaks of Influenza A (H1 N1) virus and to prepare for additional waves of the recent H1 N1 pandemic or outbreaks of other avian, swine and human influenza virus as directed and provided by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Edina received PHER funding in 2009 and 2010 for a total of $109,801. MDH is now extending this PHER grant with supplemental funds. The PHER extension grant will provide an additional $22,576 to the City of Edina. The PHER extension grant money will be used largely to cover the cost of a Public Health Emergency Response contract agreement with Bloomington Public Health. Their specific duties will include ongoing strengthening the public health workforce, strengthening disease surveillance activities and planning and implementing large scale mass vaccination campaign activities specific to Influenza A (H1 N1) virus and other influenza outbreaks. Edina will retain a portion of the grant money to cover costs of program administration. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the PHER Grant Extension Amendment. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 2011 -20 PHER Grant Extension Amendment RESOLUTION NO 2011 -20 AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF EDINA TO AMEND THE PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY RESPONSE GRANT AGREEMENT WITH THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH City of Edina WHEREAS, the STATE, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 144.0742, is empowered to enter into a con actual agreement for the provision of statutorily prescribed public health services; and WHEREAS, the STATE has received funds from the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to assess and enhance the capacity of the state, tribal and local public health departments to respond to bioterrorism, infectious diseases and other threats to public health in accordance with the National Incident Management System, National Repose Framework, National Preparedness Goal and any successor plan, and WHEREAS, the purpose of the Public Health Emergency Response (PHER) grant is to support and enhance the infrastructure critical to public health preparedness and response through ensuring continuity of public health function; strengthening and sustaining the public health workforce; accommodating surge into healthcare demand; increasing laboratory capacity and capability; strengthening disease surveillance activities; planning and implementing possible large scale mass vaccination activities; developing effective and efficient public and risk communication; developing effective and efficient community mitigation strategies; purchasing and procuring personal protective equipment antivirals and other pandemic related purchases for protecting public health workforce; addressing gaps and other public health preparedness challenges related to public health role in preparing for and responding to ongoing and emerging outbreaks of novel Influenza A (H1N1) virus and prepare for additional waves of the current pandemic or outbreaks of other avian, swine and human influenza virus as directed by the Center for Disease control and Prevention (CDC) and, WHEREAS, the grant agreement is being amended to change the end date of the grant agreement and to provide ditional federal funding to perform specific public health emergency response functions and duties in accordance with CDC and MDH requirements, and WHEREAS, the City of Edina represents that it is duly qualified and willing to perform the services set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Edina City Council that the Mayor and the City Manager enter into Public Health Emergency Response Grant Agreement with the Minnesota Department of Health to successfully complete administrative and programmatic duties contained within this grant agreement. Attest: Passed and adopted this 18th day of January 2011. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 18, 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2011. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com City Clerk 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 Minnesota Department of Health Grant Agreement .nM.lttr PHER Extension Amendment - Community Health Boards Information: (Shaded areas to be Financial S34D R( Fiscal Year: 2011 1 Total Amount of Agreement: $132,377.00 1 1 Purchase Order #:B34081 +Current Amendment Amount: $22,576.00 Grant Agreement Start Date: 1 October 2009 +Ori inal Grant Agreement: $38,002.00 Original Grant A eement Expiration Date: 31 July 2012 +Previous Amendments Total: $71,799.00 Revised Grant Agreement Expiration Date: 30 July 2011 =New Total Grant Agreement Amount: $132,377.00 Accounting Distribution: For the period of 1 October 2010 to 30 July 2011 Fiscal Year: 2011 Fund Org # I Appr I Re pt Cat Amount LIST ALL FEDERAL FUNDS BEFORE LISTING STATE FUNDS 300 0861 477 477T $22,576.00 CFDA:(federal dollars only): 93.069 Accounting Distribution: For the period of to Fiscal Year: Fund Org # Appr Re pt Cat Amount LIST ALL FEDERAL FUNDS BEFORE LISTING STATE FUNDS (9 2-25-7 (P CFDA:(federal dollars only): Accounting Distribution: For the period of to Fiscal Year: Fund Org # Appr Re pt Cat Amount LIST ALL FEDERAL FUNDS BEFORE LISTING STATE FUNDS (9 2-25-7 (P CFDA:(federal dollars only): Vendor #036781001 -00 �S 130b fy- Purchase O er Number /SI ature/D e "c'Tqbran.ce Data 12-3��c� Object Code Commodity Code Amount 5512>2C) D2-3—O9 (9 2-25-7 (P {Individual signing certifies that funds have been encumbered as required by Minn. Stat. § §16A15 and 16C. 05} NOTICE TO GRANTEE: You are required by Minn. Stat§ 270C.65, Subd. 3, to provide your social security number or federal employer tax identification number and Minnesota tax identification number if you do business with the State of Minnesota This information may be used in the enforcement of federal and state tax laws. Supplying these numbers could result in action to require you to file state tax returns and pay delinquent state tax liabilities. This Grant Agreement Amendment will not be approved unless these numbers are provided. These numbers will be available to federal and state tax authorities and state personnel involved in approving the Grant Agreement and the payment of state obligations. Grantee Name and Address: City of Edina Community Health Board 4801 W. 50th St. Edina,MN 55424 Social Security Or Federal Employer I.D. No.41- 6005118 Minnesota Tax I.D. No. (if applicable THIS PAGE OF THE GRANT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT CONTAINS PRIVATE INFORMATION. EXCEPT AS DEFINED ABOVE, THIS PAGE 'HOULD NOT BE REPRODUCED OR DISTRIBUTED EXTERNALLY WITHOUT EXPRESS WRITTEN PERMISSION OF THE GRANTEE. Ifyou circulate this grant agreement internally, only offices that require access to the tax 'identification number AND all indtviduals/qffices signing this grant agreement should have access to this page. HE- 01597 -08 (07/09) Grant Agreement Amendment Number # 2 (PHER) To Grant Agreement Number B34081 Between the Minnesota Department of Health and City of Edina Community Health Board Minnesota Department of Health PHER Extension Amendment - Community Health Boards Purchase Order #:B34081 +Current Amendment Amount: $22,576.00 Grant Agreement Start Date: 1 October 2009 +Original Grant Agreement: $38,002.00 Original Grant Agreement Expiration Date: 31 July 2012 +Previous Amendments Total: $71,799.00 Revised Grant Agreement Expiration Date: 30 July 2011 =New Total Grant Agreement Amount: $132,377.00 This GRANT AGREEMENT AMENDMENT is between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Commissioner of Minnesota Department of Health (hereinafter "STATE ") and City of Edina Community Health Board 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424(hereinafter "GRANTEE "). Recitals The STATE has a grant agreement with the GRANTEE identified as B34081 ( "Original PHER Grant Agreement ") to support and enhance the infrastructure critical to public health preparedness and response through ensuring continuity of public health functions; strengthening and sustaining the public health workforce; accommodating surge into healthcare demand; increasing laboratory capacity and capability; strengthening disease surveillance activities; planning and implementing possible large scale mass vaccination activities; developing effective and efficient public and risk communication; developing effective and efficient community mitigation strategies; purchasing and procuring personal protective equipment antivirals and other pandemic related purchases for protecting public health workforce; addressing gaps and other public health preparedness challenges related to public health role in preparing for and responding to ongoing and emerging outbreaks of novel Influenza A (H1N1) virus and prepare for additional waves of the current pandemic or outbreaks of other avian, swine and human influenza virus as directed by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and , 2. This grant agreement is being amended to change the end date of the grant agreement and to provide additional federal funding to perform specific public health emergency response functions and duties in accordance with CDC and MDH requirements. 3. The STATE and the GRANTEE are willing to amend the Original Grant Agreement as stated below. Grant Agreement Amendment In this Amendment deleted grant agreement terms will be struck out and the added grant agreement terms will be underlined. REVISION 1. Clause I GRANTEE'S DUTIES is amended as follows: Administrative Duties GRANTEE shall successfully complete the following Public Health Emergency Response (PHER) Administrative duties: All GRANTEES shall: HE- 01597 -08 (07/09) Grant Agreement Amendment Page 1 lGrant Agreement Amendment Number # 2 (PHER) To Grant Agreement Number B34081 Between the Minnesota Department of Health and City of Edina Community Health Board PHER Reporting 12 September 2011 Final Consolidated Report All PHER Funds 12 September 2011 Final Financial Reconciliation Report All PHER Funds REVISION 2. Clause H CONSIDERATION AND TERMS OF PAYMENT is amended as follows: 1.Consideration for all services performed by GRANTEE pursuant to this grant agreement shall be paid by the STATE as follows: Compensation. The total obligation of the STATE for all compensation and reimbursement to GRANTEE shall not exceed one hundred thirty two thousand three hundred seventy -seven dollars ($109,801.00 $132,377.00). A. Terms of Payment 2. Payments shall be made by the STATE monthly starting January 2011 and ending June 2011 FEDERAL FUNDS. fIF APPLICABLE] Payments are to be made from federal funds obtained b.�the STATE through Title 42 United States Code of the Public Health Services Act CFDA #93.069 (Public law and amendments thereto). If at any time such funds become unavailable this grant aueement shall be terminated immediately upon written notice of such fact by the STATE to the GRANTEE. In the event of such termination GRANTEE shall be entitled to payment determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed. REVISION 3. Clause IV TERMS OF AGREEMENT is amended as follows: TERMS OF AGREEMENT. This project agreement shall be effective on 01 October 2009, or upon the date that the final required signature is obtained by the STATE, pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 16C.05, Subd. 2, whichever occurs later, and shall remain in effect until 31 1aly 2012 30 July 2011, or until all obligations set forth in this project agreement have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever occurs first. GRANTEE understands that NO work should begin under this project agreement until ALL required signatures have been obtained, and GRANTEE is notified to begin work by the STATE'S Authorized Representative. Except as amended herein, the terms and conditions of the Original Grant Project Agreement and all previous amendments remain in full force and effect. HE- 01597 -08 (07/09) Grant Agreement Amendment Page 2 Grant Agreement Amendment Number # 2 (PHER) To Grant Agreement Number B34081 Between the Minnesota Department of Health and City of Edina Community Health Board IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this grant agreement amendment to be duly executed intending to be bound thereby. 1. GRANTEE 2. STATE AGENCY The Grantee certifies that the appropriate persons(s) have executed the Grant Agreement amendment approval and certification that STATEf inds grant agreement amendment on behalf of the Grantee as required by have been encumbered as required by Minn. Stat. §§ 16A15 and 160.05. applicable articles, bylmvs, resolutions, or ordinances. By: By: Title: Title: Date: Date: I Title: Date: Distribution: Agency — Original (fully executed) Grant Agreement Amendment Grantee State Authorized Representative (with delegated authority) HE- 01597 -08 (07/09) Grant Agreement Amendment Page 3 • i REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.J. From: James Hovland Mayor ® Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: January 18, 2011 Subject: Board and Commission Appointments ACTION REQUESTED: Endorse Mayor's recommendations for appointment as presented. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Interviews have been completed for Art Center Board, Board of Appeals & Equalization, Edina Community Health Committee, Construction Board of Appeals, Energy & Environment Commission, Human Rights and Relations Commission, Planning Commission, and Transportation. Assistance has been provided by Board and Commission Chairs in the interview process along with myself and the City Council. Following are the recommendations for appointments for seventeen open positions as follows with terms noted behind applicants' name: Art Center Board Board of Appeals & Equalization Edina Community Health Committee Construction Board of Appeals Energy & Environment Commission Tom Raeuchle (2/1/2014) Colin Nelson (2/1/2014) Barbara La Valleur (2/1/2014) Ron Anderson (2/1/2014) Dr. Adnan Qureshi (2/1/2014) Jeff Bartelson (2/1/2014) Matt Doscotch (2/1/2013 partial term) Eric Strobel (2/1/2014) Bill Sierks (2/1/2013 partial term) Julie Risser (2/1/2012 partial term) Sarah Zarrin (2/1/2012 partial term) Report /Recommendation Item IV. J. Page Two Human Rights & Relations Commission Planning Commission Edina Transportation Commission Janet Seidman (2/1/2013 partial term) Ken Potts (2/1/2014) Michael Platteter (2/1/2013 partial term) Katherine Bass (2/1/2014) Michael Thompson (2/1/2013 partial term) Elin Schold Davis (2/1/2012 partial term) 1W ow e C() • f ��RFOPA��/ 1808 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.I. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk ® Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: January 18, 2011 Subject: Resolution No. 2011 -13 Accepting Various Donations ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2011 -13 RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -13 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA City of Edina WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Park Department Spicola Family Foundation M/A $2,000.00 Edina Braemar Golf Course Braemar Memorial Fund: Chip Fuhrmann $200.00 Richard Leonard $50.00 Daniel Moran $100.00 Dated: January 18, 2011 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK Buckthorn Removal & Tree Plantings James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 18, 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this City Flan 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 day of www.CityofEdina.corn City Clerk 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 !r REPORT /RECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: IV. K. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE t&41k ® Action Public Works Director/ ❑ Discussion City Engineer Information Date: January 18, 2011 Subject: Resolution No. 2011 -21 for Traffic Control Signal Agreement No. 98010M for TH169 & Londonderry Road. i� ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt a resolution entering into an agreement with the City of Minnetonka and the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) Traffic Control Signal Agreement No. 98010M and authorize the Mayor and City Manager to sign said agreement. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The City of Minnetonka is proposing to remove and replace the bridge over TH169 at Londonderry Road and Bren Road, which is the City border with Minnetonka. Staff has been working on this project with the City of Minnetonka, see attached Joint Powers agreement from April 6, 2010. The City of Edina has entered into previous signal agreements with the Minnesota Department of Transportation for the current traffic signals; this agreement will be for the new traffic signals. The City of Edina will be responsible for minor maintenance, future repainting, and supplying power to the traffic signals. The City of Minnetonka is anticipating a May construction start for this project. The project is scheduled to be awarded in March; at that time staff will update the City Council as to the construction schedule. Staff from both cities met with Edina West Condominiums this week to cover project scope and potential schedule. A link from the Edina web site will be placed to direct inquiries to City of Minnetonka, which is leading the public communication part of the project. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2011 -21 Signal Agreement Joint Powers Agreement Packet from April 6, 2010 G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \MNDOT\169 and Londonderry Road \Signal Agreement \Item I,V. K. Resolution No 2011- 21 for Traffic Control Signal Agreement No. 9801 0M for TH 169 & Londonderry Drive.docx w9s A RESOLUTION NO. 2011-21 a APPROVING TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL AGREEMENT NO. 98010M y, co WITH THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, .�y DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, AND CITY OF MINNETONKA City of Edina WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation in conjunction with the City of Minnetonka, are planning to reconstruct the Bren Road — Londonderry Drive and TH 169 Interchange starting in 2011; and WHEREAS, the proposed project limits abut and enter within the City of Edina; and WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation and the City of Minnetonka, has requested the City of Edina enter into a Traffic Control Signal Agreement for the traffic signals at this interchange; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council approves the Traffic Control Signal Agreement with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation and the City of Minnetonka. ADOPTED this 18th day of January, 2011. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the* Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 18, 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com all City Clerk 952- 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 -826 -0379 MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAL AGREEMENT NO. 98010M BETWEEN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF MINNETONKA AND THE CITY OF EDINA TO � r Remove the existing Traffic Control Signals and Install new Traffic Control Signals with Street Lights, Emergency Vehicle Pre - emption and Signing on Bren Road at Smetana Drive; and on Trunk Highway No. 169 West and East Ramps at Bren Road; and Install Interconnect on Bren Road from Trunk Highway No. 169 East Ramps to Smetana Drive, in the Cities of Minnetonka and Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota. S.P. 2772 -93 (T.H. 169 =005) S.P. 2772- (27B69) S.A.P. 142 -148 -005 and S.A.P. 142- 010 -016 System I.D.'s 21495, 21496, and 21498 Prepared by Metropolitan District Traffic Engineering ESTIMATED AMOUNT RECEIVABLE None 98010M -1- AMOUNT ENCUMBERED None Otherwise Covered PARTIES THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by the Minnesota Department of Transportation, (State), the City of Minnetonka, (Minnetonka), and the City of Edina, (Edina). DW(' TmnT.e Minnesota Statutes Section 161.20 authorizes the Commissioner of Transportation to enter into agreements with any governmental authority for the purposes of constructing, maintaining and improving the Trunk Highway system. The parties have determined that there is justification and it is in the public's best interest to remove the existing traffic control signals and install new traffic control signals including street lights and signing (Traffic Control Signal(s)) on Bren Road at Smetana Drive; and on Trunk Highway No. 169 West and East Ramps at Bren Road; and install interconnect (Interconnect) on Bren Road from Trunk Highway No. 169 East Ramps to Smetana Drive. Minnetonka and Edina request and the State agrees to the installation of emergency vehicle pre - emption systems, (EVP System(s)) as a part of the new Traffic Control Signal installations on Trunk Highway No. 169 West and East Ramps at Bren Road. Minnetonka has elected to install an emergency vehicle pre - emption system as part of the new Traffic Control Signal installation on Bren Road at Smetana Drive. It is considered in the public's best interest for the State to provide a master controller and three (3) signal 98010M -2- cabinets and controllers (State Furnished Materials) for the new Traffic Control Signals. Edina, Minnetonka, and the State will participate in the maintenance and operation of the new Traffic Control Signals, EVP Systems, and Interconnect. WHAT M T\nm 1. Minnetonka will prepare the necessary plan, specifications and proposal, (Preliminary Engineering). Minnetonka will also perform all necessary construction inspection, (Construction Engineering). The State reserves the right to periodically inspect the project. 2. Minnetonka, with its own resources or by contract, will remove the existing traffic control signals and install new Traffic Control Signals and EVP Systems on Bren Road at Smetana Drive (System "A "); and on Trunk Highway No. 169 West Ramps (System "B ") and East Ramps (System "C ") at Bren Road; and install Interconnect on Bren Road from Trunk Highway No. 169 East Ramps to Smetana Drive, pursuant to the plans and specifications for State Project No.'s 2772 -93 (T.H. 169 =005) and 2772- (27B69); and State Aid Project No.'s 142 -148 -005 and 142 -010 -016. The cost participation for the new Traffic Control Signals, EVP Systems, and Interconnect pay items (including State Furnished Materials) for this project will be covered in Municipal Agreement No. 97691, between Minnetonka and the State. 3. Minnetonka will be responsible for the power, maintenance and operation of the new Traffic Control Signal and EVP System on Bren Road at Smetana Drive (System "A "). Minnetonka 98010M -3- will also be responsible for the Interconnect between System "A" and System "B ". 4. Minnetonka will be responsible for the cost and application to secure an adequate power supply to the service pole or pad for System "B ". Upon completion of this project, Minnetonka will thereafter pay all monthly electrical service expenses necessary to operate the new Traffic Control Signal, Interconnect and EVP System (System "B "). 5. Upon completion of this project (System "B "), Minnetonka will, at its cost and expense: (1) replace the signal system L. E. D. indications and clean the new traffic control signal; (2) clean the exterior of the controller and service cabinets; (3) re -lamp the street lights and clean the luminaire mast arm extensions; and (4) maintain the luminaires and all their components, including replacement of the luminaire if necessary. The State will, at its cost and expense, maintain the signing and the interconnect between System "B" and System "C ", and perform all other traffic control signal and street light maintenance. 6. Minnetonka will be responsible for the cost and application to secure an adequate power supply to the service pole or pad for System "C ". Upon completion of this project, Edina will thereafter pay all monthly electrical service expenses necessary to operate the new Traffic Control Signal, Interconnect and EVP System (System "C"). 98010M -4- 7. Upon completion of this project (System "C "), Edina will, at its cost and expense: (1) replace the signal system L. E. D. indications and clean the new traffic control signal; (2) clean the exterior of the controller and service cabinets; (3) re -lamp the street lights and clean the luminaire mast arm extensions; and (4) maintain the luminaires and all their components, including replacement of the luminaire if necessary. The State will, at its cost and expense, maintain the signing and the interconnect between System "B" and System "C ", and perform all other traffic control signal and street light maintenance. 8. Timing of the new Traffic Control Signals (System "B" and System "C ") provided for herein shall be determined by the State through its Commissioner of Transportation, and no changes shall be made therein except with the approval of the State. 9. The new EVP Systems (System "B" and System "C "), will be installed, operated, maintained, or removed in accordance with the following conditions and requirements: a) All maintenance of the new EVP Systems will be performed by the State. b) Emitter units may be installed only on authorized emergency vehicles, as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 169.01, Subdivision 5. Authorized emergency vehicles may use emitter units only when responding to an emergency. Edina and Minnetonka will provide the State's 98010M -5- Metropolitan District Engineer or his /her designated representative a list of all vehicles with emitter units, if requested by the State. c) Malfunction of the EVP Systems must be reported to the State immediately. d) In the event the EVP Systems or its components are, in the opinion of the State, being misused or the conditions set forth in Paragraph b above are violated, and such misuse or violation continues after the offending party receives written notice from the State, the State may remove the EVP System located in the offending party's jurisdiction. Upon removal of all or part of the EVP System pursuant to this Paragraph, all of its parts and components become the property of the State. e) All timing of the EVP Systems will be determined by the State. 10. Upon execution and approval by Edina, Minnetonka, and the State and completion of the Construction work provided for herein, this agreement will supersede and terminate Agreement No. 68616, dated May 18, 1992, between the parties, for the intersections of Trunk Highway No. 169 East and West Ramps at Bren Road, and for the intersection of Bren Road and Smetana Drive. 98010M -6- 11. Upon execution and approval by Edina, Minnetonka, and the State and completion of the Construction work provided for herein, this agreement will supersede and terminate Agreement No. 68647 -R, dated April 22, 1992, between Minnetonka and the State, for the intersection of Bren Road at Smetana Drive. 12. Upon execution and approval by Edina, Minnetonka, and the State and completion of the Construction work provided for herein, this agreement will supersede and terminate Agreement No. 77359, dated April 28, 1998, between Edina and the State, for the intersection of Trunk Highway No. 169 East Ramps at Londonderry Road. 13. Upon execution and approval by Edina, Minnetonka, and the State and completion of the Construction work provided for herein, this agreement will supersede and terminate Agreement No. 79099R, dated August 26, 1999, between Minnetonka and the State, for the intersection of Trunk Highway No. 169 West Ramps at Bren Road. 14. Upon execution and approval by Edina, Minnetonka, and the State and completion of the Construction work provided for herein, this agreement will supersede and terminate the EVP System.operation and maintenance terms of Agreement No. 89696M, dated July 13, 2006, between Minnetonka and the State, for.the intersections of Trunk Highway No. 169 at Bren Road /Londonderry, West Ramps, and Bren Road /Smetana Drive. 15. Each party will be solely responsible for its own acts and omissions, and'the results thereof, to the extent authorized by law. The State's liability is governed by the Minnesota Tort 98010M -7- Claims Act, Minnesota Statutes Section 3.736. Edina's and Minnetonka's liability is governed by Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466. Each party will be solely responsible for its own employees for any Workers Compensation Claims. 16. By signing this agreement, Edina and Minnetonka authorize the State to enter upon Edina's and Minnetonka's public right of way to maintain the new Traffic Control Signals, EVP Systems, and Interconnect. 17. Any amendment to this Agreement must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original Agreement, or their successors in office. 18. If any party fails to enforce any provisions of this Agreement, that failure does not waive the provision or its right to enforce it. 19. This Agreement contains all negotiations and agreements between the parties. No other understanding regarding this Agreement, whether written or oral, may be used to bind either party. 20. Minnesota law governs this contract. Venue for all legal proceedings arising out of this Agreement, or its breach, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota. 21. This Agreement is effective on the date the State obtains all required signatures under Minnesota Statutes 16C.05, Subdivision 2, and will remain in effect until terminated by written agreement of the parties. 98010M -8- 22. The State's obligation to perform any work, or to let a Contract for the performance of the work, on the State Project referenced above, is subject to the availability of funding from the Minnesota Legislature or other funding source. 23. Authorized Agents a. The State's Authorized Agent for the purpose of the administration of this Agreement is Allan Espinoza, Mn /DOT Metropolitan District Traffic Engineering, or his successor. His current address and phone number are 1500 West County Road B2, Roseville, MN 55113, (651) 234 -7812. b. Edina's Authorized Agent for the purpose of the administration of this Agreement is Wayne Houle, Director of Public Works and City Engineer, or his successor. His current address and phone number are Edina Public Works Facility, 7450 Metro Boulevard, Edina, MN 55439, (952) 826 -0376. C. Minnetonka's Authorized Agent for the purpose of the administration of this Agreement is Lee Gustafson, City Engineer or his successor. His current address and phone number are 14600 Minnetonka Boulevard, Minnetonka, MN 55345, (952) 939- 8239. 98010M -9- IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement by their authorized officers. CITY OF EDINA By Mayor Date By Title Date 98010M -10- IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF the parties have executed this Agreement by their authorized officers. CITY OF MINNETONKA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION By Date By Title Date Recommended for approval: Mayor By District Engineer Approved: By State Design Engineer Date Approved as to form and execution: By Contract Management Date COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION As delegated to Materials Management Division By Date 98010M -11- CITY OF EDINA RESOLUTION IT IS RESOLVED that the City of Edina enter into Mn/DOT Agreement No. 98010M with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes: To remove the existing Traffic Control Signals and Install new Traffic Control Signals with Street Lights, Emergency Vehicle Pre - emption and Signing on Bren Road at Smetana Drive; and on Trunk Highway No. 169 West and East Ramps at Bren Road; and Install Interconnect on Bren Road from Trunk Highway No. 169 East Ramps to Smetana Drive within the corporate City limits under State Project No.'s 2772 -93 (T.H. 169 =005) and 2772- (27B69) and State Aid Project No.'s 142 - 148 -005 and 142- 010 -016. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and the (Title) authorized to execute the Agreement and any amendments to the Agreement. CERTIFICATION are I certify that the above Resolution is an accurate copy of the Resolution adopted by the Council of the City of Edina at an authorized. meeting held on the day of , 2011, as shown by the minutes of the meeting in my possession. Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , 2011 Notary Public My Commission Expires �Q. A 1O gyp. (Signature) (Type or Print Name) (Title) CITY OF MINNETONKA RESOLUTION IT IS RESOLVED that the City of Minnetonka enter into Mn/DOT Agreement No. 98010M with the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation for the following purposes: To remove the existing Traffic Control Signals and Install new Traffic Control Signals with Street Lights, Emergency Vehicle Pre - emption and Signing on Bren Road at Smetana Drive; and on Trunk Highway No. 169 West and East Ramps at Bren Road; and Install Interconnect on Bren Road from Trunk Highway No. 169 East Ramps to Smetana Drive within the corporate City limits under State Project No.'s 2772 -93 (T.H. 169 =005) and 2772- (27B69) and State Aid Project No.'s 142 -148 -005 and 142- 010 -016. IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor and the are (Title) authorized to execute the Agreement and any amendments to the Agreement. CERTIFICATION I certify that the above Resolution is an accurate copy of the Resolution adopted by the Council of the City of Minnetonka at an authorized meeting held on the day of 2011, as shown by the minutes. of the meeting in my possession. Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of , 2011 Notary Public My Commission Expires �0 A (signature) (Type or Print Name) (Title) I & . A, T O e 0) may° REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. III. H. From: Wayne D. Houle, PFD. cj ® Action City Engineer Discussion Information. Date: April 6, 2010 Subject: Resolution 2010733 Approving Joint Powers Agreement with City of Minnetonka for Bren Road — Londonderry Drive and TH169 Interchange Project ACTION REQUESTED: Approve attached Resolution 2010 -33 Approving Joint Powers Agreement with City of Minnetonka for Bren Road — Londonderry Drive and TH169 Interchange Project. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The City of Minnetonka is proposing to remove and replace the bridge over TH169 at Londonderry Drive and Bren Road, which is the City border with Minnetonka. Staff has been working on this project with the City of Minnetonka for the last six months. The project will also include additional lanes across the bridge for better access from the Opus Development. Staff had been adamant that no additional lanes be added to the Edina side in order to advert through traffic through the Parkwood Knolls Development. This project was presented to the Edina Transportation Commission on January 21, 2010; see attached minutes. The bridge construction is anticipated to start May of 2011. The bridge will not be accessable for the summer of 2011. However, access to northbound TH169 from the Edina side will remain accessible throughout the project. The agreement states that there will be no cost to the City of Edina for this project. ATTACHMENTS: • Joint Powers Agreement • Minutes of Edina Transportation Commission of January 21, 2010 g:\ engineering \infrastructure\streets\mndot \169 and londonderry road \joint powers agreement\20100406 joint powers agreement with city of minnetonka.docx RESOLUTION NO. 2010-33 APPROVING JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF MINNETONKA FOR BREN ROAD — LONDONDERRY DRIVE AND TH 169 INTERCHANGE PROJECT WHEREAS, The City of Minnetonka in conjunction with'the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) are planning to reconstruct the Bren Road — Londonderry Drive and TH 169 Interchange starting in 2011; and WHEREAS, the proposed project limits abut and enter within the City of Edina; and WHEREAS, The City of Minnetonka has requested the City of Edina enter into a Joint Powers Agreement to jointly or cooperatively exercise any power common to the contracting parties or any similar power; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council approve the Joint Powers Agreement with the City of Minnetonka for the Bren Road — Londonderry Drive and TH 169 Interchange Project. ADOPTED this 6" day of April, 2010. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and .correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 6, 2010, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 20 _. City Clerk G:1 EngineedngkinfrastructurelStreetsWINDOT 1169 and Londonderry Road \Joint Powers Agreement\20100406 RESOLUTION NO 2010 - 33.doc JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY EDINA AND THE CITY OF MINNETONKA FOR THE BREN /169 INTERCHANGE PROJECT THIS AGREEMENT is entered into between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as 'Edina ") and the CITY OF AMNETONKA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Minnetonka "), with the parties collectively hereinafter referred to as the "Cities ". WHEREAS, the Cities desire to implement the design and re- construction of the state highway 169 and Bren Road/Londonderry Road interchange Project in the Cities (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, Minn. Stat. § 471.59 authorizes two or more governmental units to enter into agreements to jointly or cooperatively exercise any power common to the contracting parties or any similar power; and WHEREAS, the diagram attached as Exhibit A shows the general plan for the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual covenants the parties agree as follows: 1. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. Minnetonka will prepare plans and specifications for the Project consistent with Minnetonka and Minnesota Department of Transportation (MNDOT) design standards. Minnetonka must obtain approval from the Edina public works director for the portion of the plans and specifications affecting property within Edina. The plans and specifications must provide access from Edina to northbound state highway 169 throughout the construction, except for limited closures during non -peak times. 2. RIGHT -OF -WAY ACQUISITION. Minnetonka will be responsible for all right -of -way acquisition for the Project in both Cities. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. §465.01, Minnetonka will acquire the necessary right -of -way in Edina for the Project. Upon completion of the Project, Minnetonka will convey to Edina all right -of -way acquired in Edina that is outside the permanent right-of-way acquired for state highway 169. 3. BIDDING. Minnetonka will advertise for bids for the construction of the Project in accordance with Minnesota law and will provide Edina with an analysis of the bids received. 4. CONTRACT AWARD. Minnetonka will prepare the contract documents and enter into a contract with the approved bidder. The contract must require that the major portion of the Project be started and completed in 2011, with only finishing work to be completed in 2012. 5. COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT. Both Cities will be required to execute a cooperative agreement with MNDOT. 6. COST ALLOCATION. Edina will not be responsible for any cost of the Project. 7. OWNERSHIP. Each party will own the portion of the Project located within its corporate boundaries, except that portion located within the permanent right -of- way for state highway 169. Each party will be responsible for maintenance and re- construction of all improvements within the right-of-way that each owns. 8. PROJECT ADMINISTRATION. Minnetonka will be responsible for all administration of the Project, in consultation as needed with Edina staff. Minnetonka staff assigned as administrators for the Project are city engineer Lee Gustafson and community development director Julie Wischnack..Edina staff assigned as contacts for the Project are public works director Wayne Houle and city planner Cary Teague. Minnetonka staff will consult with Edina staff in scheduling the construction and will be responsible for notifying Edina of Project sequencing. Minnetonka staff will minimize disruption to affected Edina property owners to the extent practicable and in accordance with state law. 9. CHANGE ORDERS AND SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENTS. Edina agrees that Minnetonka may make changes in the plans and specifications or in the character of the construction which are reasonably necessary to cause the .construction to be performed and completed in a satisfactory manner. Edina also agrees that Minnetonka may enter into any change orders or supplemental agreements for the performance of any additional construction or construction occasioned by any necessary, advantageous or desirable changes in plans, as long as these are within the original scope of the Project. 10. RULES AND REGULATIONS. Minnetonka must abide by Minnesota Department of Transportation standard specifications, rules and contract administration procedures and all applicable state laws. 11. INDEMNIFICATION. Minnetonka agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Edina against any and all claims, liability, loss, damage, or expense arising 2 under the provisions of this .Agreement and caused by or resulting from negligent acts or omissions of Minnetonka and/or those of Minnetonka employees or agents. Under no circumstances, however, will Minnetonka be required to pay on behalf of itself and Edina any amounts in excess of the limits on liability established in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 applicable to any one party. The limits of liability for both parties may not be added together to determine the maximum amount of liability for either party. The intent of this paragraph is to impose on Minnetonka a limited duty to defend and indemnify Edina subject to the limits of liability under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466. The purpose of creating this duty to defend and indemnify is to simplify the defense of claims by eliminating conflicts among the parties and to permit liability claims against both parties from a single occurrence to be defended by a single attorney. 12. WAIVER. Any and all persons engaged in the work to be performed by Minnetonka will not be considered employees of Edina for any purpose, including Worker's Compensation, or any other claim that might arise out of said employment context on behalf of said employees while so engaged. All claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of Minnetonka employees while engaged on any of the work under this Agreement will not be the obligation or responsibility of Edina. The opposite situation also applies: Minnetonka will not be responsible under the Worker's Compensation Act for any employees of Edina. 13. AU DITS. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 16C.05, Subd. 5, any books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of Minnetonka and Edina relevant to the Agreement are subject to examination by Minnetonka, Edina, and either the Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor as appropriate. Minnetonka and Edina agree to maintain these records for a period of six years from the date of performance of all services covered under this agreement. 14. INTEGRATION. The entire and integrated agreement of the parties contained in this Agreement supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements between Minnetonka and Edina regarding the Project; whether written or oral. IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties have caused this agreement to be executed by their duly authorized officials. CITY OF FDINA IM AND James Hovland, Mayor Gordon Hughes, City Manager CITY OF MINNFTONKA ON Terry Schneider, Mayor John Gunyou, City Manager MINUTES OF THE Edina Transportation Commission Thursday, January 21, 2010 Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Geof Workinger, Jennifer Janovy, Tom Bonneville, Jean White, Michael Schroeder, Julie Sierks MEMBERS ABSENT: Warren Plante, Usha Abramovitz STAFF PRESENT: Jack Sullivan, Sharon Allison I. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by chair Workinger. II. Comments a. Chairman Comments Chair Workinger noted that there were students in attendance. The students said they were observing for a class project. b. Community Comments None. III. Approval of Minutes a. Regular Meeting of October 15, 2009 and December 17, 2009 The minutes of December 17, 2009, was modified as follows: page 2, item Vi, 2 "d paragraph, 3rd sentence, strike Planning Commission; page 3, item VIII, strike January and replace with December. Commissioner Bonneville motioned to approve December's modified minutes and October's minutes as submitted. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Janovy. All voted aye. Motion carried. IV. New Business a. TH 169 & Bren Road Interchange Presentation City Engineer Lee Gustafson, City of Minnetonka, explained that the City of Minnetonka has developed .plans to upgrade the TH 169 and Bren Road interchange. He said the interchange is at capacity as determined by traffic study due to redevelopments and new developments in the Opus area, and new developments cannot proceed until the interchange is upgraded. He said the plan includes a new, wider bridge with more lanes to prevent back ups, plus a sidewalk for pedestrian mobility. He said the impact to Edina during and after construction will be minimal. Construction is expected to begin April 2011. He said Edina's residents can stay informed via Edina's website which will have a link to Minnetonka's website. b. The Colony of Edina — 6200 Colonial Way Assistant city engineer Sullivan said discussion began in 2009 on this 150 apartment (194 beds) development for the site located west of Tracy Avenue and north of the Crosstown (behind the new fire station). The site is currently being used as a parking lot by Colonial Church. He said the developers were asked to study the intersections at Tracy Avenue & Olinger Blvd; Tracy Avenue & Colonial Way; and the area from the Crosstown entry/exit ramps up to Tracy Avenue & Colonial Way. Mr. Sullivan said after review, it was determined that these locations would continue to operate at level of service A & B. Additionally, Mr. Sullivan said the developers were asked to respond to six issues, all of which have been addressed satisfactorily. One of the issues included the stretch of road from Crosstown to Tracy Avenue. The concern was with cars stacking while waiting to make a left turn to go onto Colonial Way. It was determined that there would be enough gaps between vehicles to prevent stacking. However, should this become an issue in the future, Mr. Sullivan said Tracy Avenue is wide enough to accommodate a left turn lane. Mr. Jay Jensen with The Waters Senior Living, Minnetonka, MN, spoke on behalf of the development team. He explained that a similar development was done in Eden Prairie with underground parking of 70 stalls, most of which are empty. With an average age of 86, Mr. Jensen said majority of the residents are no longer driving. He said the Edina site will have 100 underground parking stalls for residents and employees with 80 surface parking spots. He said traffic generation will be minimal and will be mostly from visitors in off -peak hours. He said the facility will have a van to take residents on day trips, and a couple cars to drive them to appointments. In regards to the church losing a parking lot, Mr. Jensen said a parking study was conducted and the church will continue to have sufficient parking for Sunday services., plus a cross easement will be established so that they can use the 80 surface parking spots. Additionally, Mr. Jensen said they will offer incentive for the 75 employees to use public transit (the area is served by two. buses with a park and ride conveniently located across the street). After discussion, Commissioner Bonneville motioned to accept staff's recommendation as follow and the motion was seconded by Commissioner White. "if so desired by the Transportation Commission, adopt a motion recommending that the traffic for 6200 Colonial Way does not adversely affect the adjacent transportation system." At Commissioner Janovy's recommendation "Transportation Study" was struck and replaced with "traffic." All voted aye. Motion passed. c. Transportation Commission Role in Development Review Commissioner Schroeder explained that the. discussion of the ETC's role in the development review process came about as a result of the Zoning Ordinance Update Committee's review of ordinances and other issues. He said the newly formed committee, made up of Planning Commission members, was organized in this way to give them more latitude to a) assess what's working and not working; b) evaluate potential revisions; and c) confirm through regulatory process with City Council. 2 Commissioner Schroeder said through feedback from residents, they've learned that the public is interested and wants clarity regarding how the review process works. He said the same feedback was shared by planning commissioners from other cities when their input was sought. He said there are four things being looked at: 1. Bringing the ordinances in alignment with the Comp Plan; 2. Difficulty in navigating ordinances; 3. Development review process; 4. Content change, i.e. planned unit development (PUD), etc. Additionally, Commissioner Schroeder said there are four commissions that give input in the development review process; they are: Heritage Preservation, ETC, Energy, and Planning Commission, and of these four, only the Heritage Preservation and Planning Commission have statutory authority. He said clarification is needed regarding the role and responsibility of each commission and how the public interacts with each. He said there needs to be a public input process that is recognized and is consistent throughout the entire review process. He said this is on the agenda for discussion because initially, the committee recommended eliminating the ETC from the review process .(relative to traffic studies) because, upon reviewing the ETC's ordinance, it was determined that this was not one their responsibilities. However, based on discussions at one of the committee's meeting that Commissioners Workinger and Bonneville attended, the recommendation was tabled until a later date. Chair Working er then explained that the purpose of the discussion was to review the value the ETC brings to the development review process. The following summarizes the discussion that took place: • Determined that City engineer staff or traffic consultant do not attend the Planning Commission meetings when development proposals are being discussed. • Commissioner Bonneville suggested that the ETC could become involve when: a) there is a PUD; b) the project generates more than 1000 ADT; c) the project generates more than 100 cars during the am /pm peak hours; d) the roadway is currently congested (level of service E or worst), or is at 80% capacity; and e) when requested by the Council or Planning Commission. He also suggested five improvements to the review process starting with: 1) preliminary staff and developer meeting; 2) system of design (who /what/when /and how process will flow); 3) system design of interactions of people involved (developer /staff /commissions, etc.); 4) system design of decision- making process; and 5) post decision action by City /developer. o Not known if the number of traffic studies that the ETC review would be reduced based on Commissioner Bonneville's suggestion. • 90 -day review process could be jeopardized when decisions are delayed (process begins with the ETC, followed by the Planning Commission and then the Council). • In the case of Little Schezuan Restaurant, the ETC could not separate onsite circulation from on street parking, but were not allowed to address onsite parking. • Planning Commission is not compelled to act on the ETC's recommendation because the ETC is not in an advisory role. 3 • Suggestion that the Planning Commission ignore the ETC since operating at the same level; and that the Planning Commission does their review concurrently; the ETC is responsible for the Transportation Chapter and public roadways, while the Planning Commission is responsible for the site; Planning Commission looks at transportation issues from a different point of view and will not have as much interest in the Transportation Chapter. • Suggestion that the ETC becomes advisory to the Planning Commission. • Each commission brings different insight and this should not be lost because residents lack clarification. • Developers are not required to attend the ETC meeting, but they are encouraged to attend and present their proposal and answer questions; they are aware that the ETC is advisory to the Council. Commissioner Schroeder said the committee does not have a set decision - making timeframe and suggested that the ETC assign two members to gather input from the public. At the conclusion of the discussion, vice -chair Janovy suggested that commissioners email assistant city engineer Sullivan their points =of -view on the discussion. Chair Workinger asked that responses be sent by the following week Thursday. d. Small Area Planning Process Presentation Commissioner Schroeder explained that less, than 10% of commercial space identified in the Comp Plan would go through this process. He said the Small Area Planning process was presented to the Council and they would like it applied to the old public works site. The process is designed to work as follows: • Engage residents and stakeholders to develop a plan that would be led by community volunteers in a short, but intensive initial planning period (one month); • The group would be made up of a Design Team (resident experts); a Technical Advisory Group (city staff and other agencies); a Community Advisory Team (representation from the each commission, school board, etc.); and the Public who are encouraged to attend all scheduled meetings; • Meetings dates and times will already be established before the groups are formed. • Results expected is to develop a plan that would guide further planning and development. Some community members.will be selected by the Planning Commission and others will be selected by residents and other stakeholders in attendance. Commissioner White volunteered to represent the ETC on the Community Advisory Team. V. Planning Commission Update (Commissioner Schroeder) See Commissioner Schroeder's presentations above (Items IV c & d). VI. Bike Edina Task Force Update (Commissioner Janovy) Commissioner Janovy reported that a member of the task force passed away. See minutes of January 14, 2010, for detailed update of the BETF activities. 4 VII. Staff Liaison Comments a. Southwest Transitway Route 3A Assistant city engineer Sullivan reported that Edina). Route 3A Was selected (this route bypasses b. NTMP Deadline Assistant city engineer Sullivan reported that February 9, is the deadline for applications to be submitted to the Engineering Department. Applications are online or also available in the Engineering Department. Other Comments: Commissioner Bonneville asked assistant city engineer .Sullivan to give a. brief update on the W. 70th Street project at future meetings. Regarding the Complete Streets Resolution that was passed recently by Council, Commissioner Janovy asked what is the next step in the process. Assistant city engineer Sullivan said on February 4, the legislators will reconvene to develop a statewide framework. He said there are no plans to do anything locally, except to continue with those things in the Comp Plan and Transportation Chapter that are similar. Chair Workinger said he would like to see the City develop a checklist of the major elements of Complete Streets that are implemented in local plans. Chair Workinger asked that the minutes going out to others for their meeting, even in draft form, be sent to all ETC commissioners. Chair Workinger said vice -chair Janovy will be chairing the next two meetings in his absence. Vlll. Adjournment. 5 l ' f 91 T i . ���ry�r TH 169 N9 °; lilt. netonika 3 ° ENNEPIN COUNTY T` B re n Road a ° °� w. l - A 0 0 Lr ° IMm/o ava5ry comes eelwHN - ° ?� O I ° `O O I ► a. '�'" ti e ° r� i ° I ° r f O 21". I , ° o y\ t rk -- O\ 0 100 200 I "I I of u SCALE IN FEET DESIGN FILE: 1<: 1502 -24 \Cad \Layout \0150224_lo.dgn DATE: 10/16/2009 { y .Lo O 1 v ,. 1 //O '.. ,CITYIX Ih,E1OVN -`. '• •A, ' i.0 _ � � \\ \\ °� • .....- . •� .. - t �. "- ,q ,.� �_ `j� _r4 - X07 �� ��� i // U) j- I_. 71 � I per, dI. I T, t I wrkwA As oca,TCS r . O / iT O pl . ^s E FHruoc {rtJ EAR r s - r I. • ; bl I•I r I ' •r' ° � _I ° • kYhnETM'YA MhVESOlA 3N): ��' \•, � g (S _. , r' 1 . t O '- bl_ I. •-;�' - '�- ��•'�� � � _ O 1 .t ; ° "AGCNE `s�`io selEar vACacl '.i r1 I i t � •' -... 1'Q I . _tiElO A.l llrvxESOIA a �1 BREN ROAD r _ G�� t.,, x .. a II -�;,' I `♦ I lr I, '•' ;' Ez eslcvl _ � x � I °I E sNko s k A BREN RD Wy..T l -� .�.2•a + j " =. ra -.;� �G .,...f( i - e" Is• w rr - -• o0 7-= 17�- �jiTL'av� � _- -_ .. - f-iT El u Q iI— L rovc,lE:a uznw.vcw.rExr -. .�- ...E �- IA• su L1 +_ ' Z. 5 5fl ocus wnnr i' %.. \ _'- • . 2 6 M� __N re.mI? c I �� W r.•relErwx�elnlESOasssA> ...h 'E•` 700 - ' S' I IA' iNNU L h z x W "� . ' . _ T � J •,klol�,. .[SODA -ss�l; + ... � ffi �i� a i1 1 � '�._` T � 1 � - - — ii� 1NRUkA�_AnE �- - -i O BREN R ' '� � � r 1 I 1 i 4� i I Q to 1t �'h^ti_..� :. ° � ��•l � I i,.. SxIU � D E aN i .♦ I �' 911E 10 5 5 _ J O MPH M o i r - UNITED HEALTH ENT \ f O Q *e 4xo - 1�f �3Y oa I E p kE;\ o °\?'O ° f! { ,,°��e I.0 1O/y, `+ AFL D ,� iI Y:ETIXIYA I.UIa1ESOiA S`Nl \\ ° °O I � rT,•�a y 2 TT✓J I a� I � r II � . O I I 1 }I '�� !` •r / -°..fit er �, " °% \ 1 I .tia o o o•s ` .-.911 O t 1 iii,., q# ,r. o Ism f` i •. , I \, 1 c , 7Ut Xenia AvenuO SOUIh. SudO 300 - -:_ - - o Onneapdrs, MN WCQ ViJ mmrvsbeng com x x try ° yw f n:. . :- __ :.,, .. of },1- I�J.G.1 r : :I J; ,: . � 'f' -•.. �Yi ��_ -'q _ a� l 3 INFRASTRUCTURE L ENGKURING I FUNNMO L CONSTRUCTION ' . ♦� - - -- - -- - -- ~= �-�-"— - -�� A66 p� 1 � Ej � vV`•-E.1 6 {: x �, � l\ \01 \^ \1! v 1 r °011 0 I-TH 169 PH 601 O o• r4lA Y• s Lo i I a7 i /. ii.. _ LQN ND DE�FRY -RIN '". _ _Ia• InR A.E f� _ -� Z fr Ex 211161.- D _ ter r � I' 1. ,.�_ -�,,, ,tip \� �� � f 30 0 a' Ru.E I MPH O 30 l o O ° y, iIX �. !CCENO• {�y� ShNED r1=J.LINCARE SEM ht ca CD EkiU M1'aEIESDiApSO/.l 4,(Y `� / :g15IA1E MV.Y ND t49 ° / �,</ ED'lA, I.'1'.IaFEOIAESIIE En 1 tt WW Y=N �I '� ' '�ol°T7Y,',°�iy*� fI 'p �\ ) or , o r dr/ i I : i it a c � n�x•,,, ' °� ��d! (,..1�� lVi ` °- Off`/°•/ % L ✓ly ...,� T .- 1 T � teL° °o�ET'• o' *oo'�.°s„ .;. o o'I i ��-. o z ;WD -vro {ilia 0 :t> , ` UH(3,- Phascll- 9703 Dal. Park Ddl. Projed No. 06060.09b — Legend F_ _ Roadway (.d Reconstruct Traffic Signal PZ ;J� Roadway Removal ; "rj Existing Ail Way Stop [ = -7 Bridge, Walls Construction Limits L_� 7 Shoulders (Paved) - -- - Existing ROW (-7 Median - Temporary Easement C -_] Sidewalk Permanent Easement L __7 Proposed Pond — — — r f O 21". I , ° o y\ t rk -- O\ 0 100 200 I "I I of u SCALE IN FEET DESIGN FILE: 1<: 1502 -24 \Cad \Layout \0150224_lo.dgn DATE: 10/16/2009 { y .Lo O 1 v ,. 1 //O '.. ,CITYIX Ih,E1OVN -`. '• •A, ' i.0 _ � � \\ \\ °� • .....- . •� .. - t �. "- ,q ,.� �_ `j� _r4 - X07 �� ��� i // U) j- I_. 71 � I per, dI. I T, t I wrkwA As oca,TCS r . O / iT O pl . ^s E FHruoc {rtJ EAR r s - r I. • ; bl I•I r I ' •r' ° � _I ° • kYhnETM'YA MhVESOlA 3N): ��' \•, � g (S _. , r' 1 . t O '- bl_ I. •-;�' - '�- ��•'�� � � _ O 1 .t ; ° "AGCNE `s�`io selEar vACacl '.i r1 I i t � •' -... 1'Q I . _tiElO A.l llrvxESOIA a �1 BREN ROAD r _ G�� t.,, x .. a II -�;,' I `♦ I lr I, '•' ;' Ez eslcvl _ � x � I °I E sNko s k A BREN RD Wy..T l -� .�.2•a + j " =. ra -.;� �G .,...f( i - e" Is• w rr - -• o0 7-= 17�- �jiTL'av� � _- -_ .. - f-iT El u Q iI— L rovc,lE:a uznw.vcw.rExr -. .�- ...E �- IA• su L1 +_ ' Z. 5 5fl ocus wnnr i' %.. \ _'- • . 2 6 M� __N re.mI? c I �� W r.•relErwx�elnlESOasssA> ...h 'E•` 700 - ' S' I IA' iNNU L h z x W "� . ' . _ T � J •,klol�,. .[SODA -ss�l; + ... � ffi �i� a i1 1 � '�._` T � 1 � - - — ii� 1NRUkA�_AnE �- - -i O BREN R ' '� � � r 1 I 1 i 4� i I Q to 1t �'h^ti_..� :. ° � ��•l � I i,.. SxIU � D E aN i .♦ I �' 911E 10 5 5 _ J O MPH M o i r - UNITED HEALTH ENT \ f O Q *e 4xo - 1�f �3Y oa I E p kE;\ o °\?'O ° f! { ,,°��e I.0 1O/y, `+ AFL D ,� iI Y:ETIXIYA I.UIa1ESOiA S`Nl \\ ° °O I � rT,•�a y 2 TT✓J I a� I � r II � . O I I 1 }I '�� !` •r / -°..fit er �, " °% \ 1 I .tia o o o•s ` .-.911 O t 1 iii,., q# ,r. o Ism f` i •. , I \, 1 c , 7Ut Xenia AvenuO SOUIh. SudO 300 - -:_ - - o Onneapdrs, MN WCQ ViJ mmrvsbeng com x x try ° yw f n:. . :- __ :.,, .. of },1- I�J.G.1 r : :I J; ,: . � 'f' -•.. �Yi ��_ -'q _ a� l 3 INFRASTRUCTURE L ENGKURING I FUNNMO L CONSTRUCTION ' . ♦� - - -- - -- - -- ~= �-�-"— - -�� A66 p� 1 � Ej � vV`•-E.1 6 {: x �, � l\ \01 \^ \1! v 1 r °011 0 I-TH 169 PH 601 O o• r4lA Y• s Lo i I a7 i /. ii.. _ LQN ND DE�FRY -RIN '". _ _Ia• InR A.E f� _ -� Z fr Ex 211161.- D _ ter r � I' 1. ,.�_ -�,,, ,tip \� �� � f 30 0 a' Ru.E I MPH O 30 l o O ° y, iIX �. !CCENO• {�y� ShNED r1=J.LINCARE SEM ht ca CD EkiU M1'aEIESDiApSO/.l 4,(Y `� / :g15IA1E MV.Y ND t49 ° / �,</ ED'lA, I.'1'.IaFEOIAESIIE En 1 tt WW Y=N �I '� ' '�ol°T7Y,',°�iy*� fI 'p �\ ) or , o r dr/ i I : i it a c � n�x•,,, ' °� ��d! (,..1�� lVi ` °- Off`/°•/ % L ✓ly ...,� T .- 1 T � teL° °o�ET'• o' *oo'�.°s„ .;. o o'I i ��-. o z ;WD -vro {ilia 0 :t> , ` UH(3,- Phascll- 9703 Dal. Park Ddl. Projed No. 06060.09b R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/5/2011 9:52:46 Council Check Register Page - 1 116/2011 - 116/2011 " . Check # Date Amount Supplier'/ Explanation PO # , - Doc No Inv No Account No. Subledger Account Description Business Unit 342870 116/2011 100609 , 50TH'& FRANCE BUSINESS'ASSOCIA 572.00 ANNUAL DUES 253226 7 -553 5820.6105: DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 50TH STREET GENERAL 572.00 342871 11612011 125153,- A.M.E. CONSTRUCTION CORP. 2,430.50 FINAL PAYMENT 253079 010711 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 2,430.50 342872 1/6/2011 101833 A.T.O.M. 200.00 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 253227 121010 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 200.00 342873 11612011 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 66.00 253094 0724992 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 66.00 342874 116/2011 105162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 34.74 JAN - MAR ALARM SERVICE :. 253228 37594049 5111.6250 ALARM SERVICE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 902.77 JAN - MAR°ALARM SERVICE - 253229 37593739 5420.6250 ALARM SERVICE CLUB HOUSE 3.37 BILLING ADJUSTMENT. 253230 31946969A 5420.6250 ALARM SERVICE CLUB HOUSE 940.88 342875 11612011 127992 ADVENT CREATIVE GROUP INC. 258.33 VIDEO EDITING TRAINING 253030 ACG56680 2210.6103 PROFESSIONALSERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 258.33 342876 116/2011 102715 ALLEGRA,EDINA 270.39 EP NEWSLETTER 253197 84963 5621.6575 PRINTING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 270.39 342877-, 116/2011 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES 31.29 253198 123110 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 50.25 253198 123110 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 55.09 253198 123110 5841.6201 LAUNDRY YORK OCCUPANCY 140.16 253198 123110 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 212.21 253198 123110 5861.6201 LAUNDRY VERNON OCCUPANCY 218.24 253198 123110 1551.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL 422.19 253198 123110 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,129.43 342878 11612011 100665 AMSAN 113.69 CLEANING SUPPLIES- 00001133 252876 236450268 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/512011 9:52:46 Council Check Register Page - 2 1/6/2011 — 1/6/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 113.69 342879 116/2011 124774 ANCHOR FENCE OF MN INC. 5,143.08 FINAL PAYMENT 253080 010711 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 5,143.08 342880 11612011 102470 AON RISK SERVICES INC. OF MN 4,254.00 PREMIUM 253231 6100000124105 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 4,254.00 342881 11612011 119976 AP LAWN 386.19 TREE TRIMMING 00002048 252987 CITYED -1110 5630.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAKES 386.19 342882 1/612011 101772 APCO INTERNATIONAL INC 92.00 2011 MEMBERSHIP DUES 253232 TAUNYA HEGYI 1400.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 92.00 342883 11612011 126390 API GARAGE DOOR STORE 5,536.00 FINAL PAYMENT 253081 010711 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 5,536.00 342884 1/612011 118491 APPLE COMPUTER INC. 2,542.35 [MAC 252919 9861344513 2210.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COMMUNICATIONS 2,542.35 342885 11612011 101566 APPRAISAL INSTITUTE 310.00 2011 DUES -ROBERT WILSON 253233 ACCT 85749 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 310.00 342886 11612011 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 85.86 COFFEE 252877 418397 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 85.86 342887 11612011 114475 ARMOR SECURITY INC. 96.19 JAN - MARCH ALARM SERVICE 00001124 253234 148415 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 144.28 JAN - MAR ALARM SERVICE 00001124 253235 148414 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 240.47 342888 11612011 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 259.71 WING KIT, FORD TRANSIT WI 00005458 252920 10078547 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 259.71 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/6/2011 - 116/2011 ' Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv. No Account No 342889 1/612011 ... 119465 ASSOCIATIO_ N'OF MINNESOTA COUNT =. 294.00. 2011 ANNUAL DUES 253236 31632 1490.6105 294.00 342890 11612011 120995 - „AVR INC.. ".:. 421.09 READY MIX - 0000V11.252921 41361 5932.6520 421.09 252922 41430 5932.6520 746.25 252923 41994 5932.6520 321.30 252924 42348 5932.6520 259.71 252925 . 43081 5932:6520 2,169.44 - 342891 11612011 119206 AZTECA SYSTEMS INC. 5,899.61 CITYWORKS ANNUAL UPDATE 253237 6014 5913.6103 5,899.61 _ 342892 11612011 102503 BAGS'& BOWS 57.96 METALLIC TISSUE PAPER 00009282 253199 0090100226 5120.6406 / 93.58 BAGS 00009297 253200 0090121221 5120.6406 151:54 342893 11612011 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. ` 117.46 BATTERIES 00005454 253069 6530 1553.6530 - 117.46 342894 116/2011 125300 BADMAN, DOUG 117.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 253035 123010 5510.6107 = 117.50 -, 342895 1/612011 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS 1,510.68 ICE SKATES 00002049 253064 00082396 5630.6406 1,510.68 342896 116/2011 101365 BELLBOY. CORPORATION 3,671:68 253095 56429200 5842.5513 1,076.40 253096 56357800 5842.5513 198.20 253097 '56429300 5842.5512 - 3.10. 253098 56357900 5842.5512 1,474.25 253099 56429900. 5862.5513 143.15 253100 56429600 5862.5512 117.10 253101 5R4297n0 6822 FF73 Subledger Account Description. DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CONCRETE CONCRETE' CONCRETE CONCRETE, CONCRETE ' PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 1/5/2011 9:52:46 Page - 3 Business Unit PUBLIC HEALTH GENERAL STORM SEWER GENERAL STORM SEWER GENERAL STORM SEWER GENERAL STORM SEWER GENERAL STORM SEWER DISTRIBUTION ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ARENA ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 116/2011 - 1/6/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 60.14 253102 84656000 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS GENERAL SUPPLIES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 1/5/2011 9:52:46 Page- 4 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING SUPERVISION 8 OVERHEAD PW BUILDING FINANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PRINTING POOL CONCESSIONS POOL OPERATION SENIOR CITIZENS 6,744.02 342897 116/2011 127986 BERGMAN, MARGE 196.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 252986 122810 1280.6107 196.00 342898 1/612011 124957 BERNARD L. DALSIN COMPANY 46,299.25 FINAL PAYMENT 253082 010711 4402.1705.30 46,299.25 342899 11612011 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 19.85 CALENDARS 252878 OE- 243859 -1 1160.6406 19.85 342900 11612011 125209 BISEK, KATIE 14.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 253285 123110 1554.6107 14.00 342901 1/612011 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 295.68 253103 101972 5862.5513 295.68 342902 11612011 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 46.38 BAND ASSEMBLY 00005486 252879 473821 1553.6530 188.21 BRAKE CHAMBERS 00005512 252926 472252 1553.6530 68.29 COOLANT 00005521 252927 474582 1553.6530 73.06 SEAT 00005490 252988 475423 1553.6530 375.94 342903 11612011 106484 BRINDLE, MARY 35.00 REIMBURSE FOR SEMINAR 253014 122910 1120.6104 35.00 342904 11612011 104649 BRYAN, BILL 18.03 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 252880 122710 5320.6406 292.88 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 252880 122710 5311.6406 310.91 342905 116/2011 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 784.72 NEWSLETTERS 253031 23646 1628.6575 784.72 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS GENERAL SUPPLIES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 1/5/2011 9:52:46 Page- 4 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING SUPERVISION 8 OVERHEAD PW BUILDING FINANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES PRINTING POOL CONCESSIONS POOL OPERATION SENIOR CITIZENS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/5/2011 9:52:46 Council Check Register Page - 5 1/6/2011 - 1/6/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 342906 116/2011 103244 BURTIS, ROBERT 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 1/13/11 253221 123110 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 342907 11612011 127500 CAPITAL MAINTENANCE SERVICES L 305.73 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 253201 86239 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 305.73 342908 11612011 119455 ,CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 4,471.35 253104 14161 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 149.00 253105 14158 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 31.40 253106 14151 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 478.60 253107 14156 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5,130.35 342909 1/612011 100677 CARGILL INC. 6,211.37 ICE CONTROL 00005710 252928 2983565 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 6,096.80 ICE CONTROL 00005710 252929 2989056 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 4,589.94 ICE CONTROL 00005710 252930 2991303 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 16,898.11 342910 1/612011 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 357.00 253108 88591 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 416.00 253109 88780 5842.5513 COST -OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 773.00 342911 11612011 102372 CDW_GOVERNMENT INC. 127.48 DIGITAL CAMERA 00064399 253036 VWF5277 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 127.48 342912 11612011 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 6,556.79 5591458-4 252881 5591458 -12110 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 3,170.53 5546504 -1 252882 5546504-12/10 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 59.94 5590919 -6 253202 5590919 -12/10 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 9,787.26 342913 11612011 102804 CENTURY COLLEGE 600.00 CPR CERTIFICATION 253018 00397988 1470.6104 CONFERENCES &SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 150.00 TRAINING SITE FEE 253019 00397987 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 750.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/5/2011 9:52:46 Council Check Register Page - - 6 1/6/2011 — 1/6/2011 - Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 342914 1/6/2011 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 557.83 ICE MELT 00008092.253037 516291 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 557.83 342915 1/6/2011 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO - 532.15 253110 435288 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 532.15 342916 11612011 118580 CITY OF EDINA 19,283.94 252989 122310 5900_.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 19,283.94 i 342917- 11612011 120433 COMCAST 74.95 8772 10 614 0165667 2.53286• 165667 -12/10 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 74.95 342918 11612011 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 72.33 SAFETY GLASSES 00005447- 252931 _,03822753 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 72.33 I 342919 11612011 101704 COOK,'BARBARA 470.71 ADAPTIVE PROGRAM SERVICES 252883' 10 -1556 -1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 470.71 342920 11612011 101832 CORNERHOUSE 2,538.98 FORENSIC INTERVIEW SERVICES 253236 2011 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,538.98 342921 11612011 104310 COUNTRY ENTERPRISES INC. I 408.80 PLOW MARKERS 00005431 252932 23317 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 408.80 342922 11612011 126059 CREATIVE COMMUNICATION SERVICE 590.00 ON -HOLD MESSAGING 253239 3876 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 590.00 342923 1/612011 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 559.45 BIKE BOTTLES 253203 9900 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK ! 2,114.98 BIRTHDAY PARTY SHIRTS 253204 9866 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD - EDINBOROUGH PARK 2,674.43 342924 11612011 127988 CURRY, JOHN R55CKREG LOG20000 253111 582503 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,413.05 253112 Council Check Register 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 43.00 1/6/2011 — 1/6/2011 582500 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 582502 100.00 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 253017 6509 GLEASON 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 253115 100.00 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 342925 1/6/2011 123995 DICK'S /LAKEVILLE SANITATION IN 104020 DALCO 252.08 238.33 DEGREASER, GLASS CLEANER 00005453 252933 2284536 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 4095.6103 238.33 3,462.51 REFUSE 253281 342926 1/612011 4095.6103 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 6,877.70 1/5/2011 9:52:46 Page - 7 Business Unit UTILITY BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,622.33 253111 582503 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,413.05 253112 582499 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 43.00 253113 582500 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 22.40 253114 582502 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 778.80 253115 582501 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5,879.58 342930 11612011 342927 116/2011 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 2,177.00 CALENDAR ADVERTISING 253240 20.67 DRIVERS 00005480 252990 541993 1553.6556 TOOLS 2.82 SOCKET 00005464 252991 542014 1553.6556 TOOLS 23.49 6,531.00 342928 1/612011 123995 DICK'S /LAKEVILLE SANITATION IN 252.08 3,415.19 REFUSE 253280 1190371 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,462.51 REFUSE 253281 1190370 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6,877.70 342929 11612011 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH STREET RUBBISH 50TH STREET RUBBISH 3,406.71 CHEMICALS 00001215 252992 82702023 -10 5915.6586. WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 3,406.71 342930 11612011 123253 DYNAMIC PUBLISHING LLC 2,177.00 CALENDAR ADVERTISING 253240 010111 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 2,177.00 CALENDAR ADVERTISING 253240 010111 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 2,177.00 CALENDAR ADVERTISING 253240 010111 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 6,531.00 342931 1/6/2011 100740 EARL F. ANDERSEN INC. 252.08 REFLECTIVE BANDS 00001181 252934 0094415 -IN 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 252.08 342932 116/2011 103069 EDINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING STREET NAME SIGNS 924.00 AR &LE GET FIT INITIATIVE 253242 122810 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 924.00 CITY OF EDINA 1/5/2011 9:52:46 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 8 116/2011 — 1/612011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 342933 11612011 101667 EDINA HIGH SCHOOL 10,201.50 HOLIDAY CLASSIC % 253038 BRAEMAR ICE 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA 10,201.50 342934 116/2011 123189 EDINA LIQUOR 462.00 BEER/ WINE 00006338 252884 122310 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 462.00 342935 11612011 101837 EDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT 2,961.00 OFFICERS FOR HOCKEY GAMES 00008097 253039 10 -0089 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 2,961.00 342936 11612011 103594 EDINALARM INC. 179.97 JAN - JUNE ALARM SERVICE 253241 63236 5422.6250 ALARM SERVICE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 179.97 342937 11612011 121440 EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWO 15,000.00 CODE RED FOR 2011 253243 9458 2310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES E911 15,000.00 342938 116/2011 116264 ENGELMAN, SHERRY 1,309.00 2010 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 253032 123010 1490.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC HEALTH 1,309.00 342939 11612011 127590 ETTERMAN ENTERPRISES 229.64 TERMINALS, FUSES 00005475 252993 166504 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 229.64 342940 116/2011 124772 EXCALIBUR CAULKING INC. 3,458.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6 253083 010711 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 3,458.00 342941 116/2011 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 245.51 BATTERIES 00005420 252994 69- 027838 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 245.51 342942 11612011 102101 FEDEX OFFICE 15.26 GIFT CERTIFICATES 00006364 253283 062200020807 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 15.26 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES Business Unit DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION 1/5/2011 9:52:46 Page- 9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WEB DEVELOPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION POOL ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION SPECIAL ACTIVITIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 1/6/2011 - 116/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 342943 1/6/2011 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 212.67 CS FITTINGS 00001090 252885 501287958.003 5913.6406 1,529.51 REPAIR CLAMPS 00001097 252995 501288241.001 5913.6406 1,742.18 342944 11612011 103985 FLOR, JON 200.00 BRAEMAR AD DESIGN 253205 2222 2210.6103 200.00 342945 11612011 102727 FORCE AMERICA 195.87 TOP ENCLOSURE 00005522 253070 01354991 1553.6530 582.64 MOTOR 00005522 253071 01354990 1553.6530 778.51 342946 116/2011 100764 G & K SERVICES 63.69 SHOP TOWELS 252935 1006701672 5422.6201 65.07 SHOP TOWELS 252936 1006723725 5422.6201 128.76 342947 1/6/2011 101662 GCSAA 160.00 DUES - JEFFREY LUGER 253246 199087 5410.6105 160.00 342948 1/6/2011 119121 GENERAL SHEET METAL CO. INC. 180,956.37 FINAL PAYMENT 253084 010711 4402.1705.30 180,956.37 342949 116/2011 119936 GLOBAL OAK 37.50 BRAEMAR E- COMMERCE 253206 010749 5410.6103 56.25 AQUATIC CENTER E- COMMERCE 253206 010749 5310.6103 75.00 ART CENTER E- COMMERCE 253206 010749 5110.6103 412.50 PARK & REC E- COMMERCE 253206 010749 1627.6103 843.75 ART CENTER E- COMMERCE 253206 010749 5110.6103 2,512.50 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 253206 010749 2210.6124 3,937.50 342950 11612011 100025 GOLDEN SHOE STABLES INC. 800.00 SLEIGH RIDES FOR FESTIVAL 253223 010111 5631.6136 800.00 342951 11812011 101103 GRAINGER 73.44 CLAMP W /ARC WELDER 00005518 252937 9423368480 1553.6556 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES Business Unit DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION 1/5/2011 9:52:46 Page- 9 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WEB DEVELOPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION POOL ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION SPECIAL ACTIVITIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/5/2011 9:52:46 Council Check Register Page - 10 1/6/2011 — 1/6/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 107.05 BATTERIES, WIRE TAGS 00005450 252938 9421438202 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 62.71 BRACKET 00002026 252996 9411798417 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 21.43 BLADES 00002045 252997 9416865294 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 108.88 LAMP CHANGER, POLE 00002045 252998 9416865302 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 98.79 RECEPTACLE, PLUG 00006489 253045 9420367030 5210.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF DOME PROGRAM 222.89 LIGHTS 00006487 253046 9410027677 5210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 395.18 RECEPTACLES, PLUGS 00006489 253047 9419828414 5210.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF DOME PROGRAM 30.79 DEGREASER 253207 9424171552 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,121.16 342952 11612011 120201 GRANICUS INC. 829.64 WEBSTREAMING - JAN 2011 253244 23501 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 829.64 342953 11612011 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 897.00 253116 125575 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 380.75 253117 125574 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,277.75 342954 11612011 124854 GRESSER COMPANIES INC. 2,910.00 FINAL PAYMENT 253085 010711 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 2,910.00 342955 1/612011 124854 GRESSER COMPANIES INC. 18,990.00 FINAL PAYMENT NO. 1 253086 JAN2011 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 18,990.00 342956 1/612011 124854 GRESSER COMPANIES INC. 30,124.05 FINAL PAYMENT 253087 2001JAN 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 30,124.05 342957 116/2011 100786 GREUPNER, JOE 2,440.00 GOLF LESSONS 252886 122710 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 5,683.00 GOLF LESSONS 252886 122710 5201.4543 GOLF DOME RECEIPTS GOLF DOME REVENUES 8,123.00 342958 11612011 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 10,980.00 1ST QUARTERLY INSTALLMENT 253245 JAN2011 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 10,980.00 342959 11612011 100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT 135.66 FORESTRY SUPPLIES 00001132 252887 90976 1644.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TREES & MAINTENANCE CITY OF EDINA 1/5/2011 9:52:46 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 11 1/612011 — 1/6/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subl edger Account Description Business Unit 135.66 342960 116/2011 100788 H &L MESABI 2,675.19 BLADES 00005547 252888 81697 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,675.19 342961 116/2011 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 169.77 REGISTER PAPER 00007515 253208 271286 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 169.77 342962 11612011 125270 HARTFORD 4.85 COBRA BASIC LIFE 253247 JAN 2011 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5,062.20 PREMIUM 253248 5176880 -2 9900.2033.05 LIFE INSURANCE - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 5,067.05 342963 11612011 102209 HEALTH PARTNERS 1,056.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 252939 DOUGLAS MAY 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,056.00 342964 116/2011 117186 HELGREN, ADAM 100.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 252999 122710 5630.6201 LAUNDRY CENTENNIAL LAKES 100.00 342965 11612011 106436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 560.00 RADIO ADMIN 00001463 252940 20068078 1553.6237 RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 560.00 342966 11612011 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 3,243.00 2011 M100 MAINTENANCE 253249 120810 1180.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION 3,243.00 342967 11612011 102460 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 3,680.00 2011 AUTOMARK MAINTENANCE 253250 2011 1180.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION 3,680.00 342968 11612011 101588 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 2,600.00 LIEUTENANT TESTING 253020 00217889 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,600.00 342969 11612011 103838 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 320.00 EMT REFRESHER 00003822 253021 00217105 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 320.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 11612011 125176 HORIZON AGENCY INC. CITY OF EDINA 58,233.00 PREMIUM Council Check Register 2,384.00 PREMIUM 253252 1/6/2011 — 1/6/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 342970 11612011 253254 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 202,057.00 743.85 PRINTER FOR MECHANICS 00004389 252941 48531750 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 1,067.68 PRINTER FOR MECHANICS 00004389 252942 48573367 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 010111 34.20 SPEAKER BARS 00004401 253040 48751355 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 342975 5,046.50 NEW PCS (8) 00004396 253041 48726527 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 1,728.00 650.05 PCS FOR LIQUOR STORES 00004397 253209 48733279 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 650.05 PCS FOR LIQUOR STORES 00004397 253209 48733279 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,300.10 PCS FOR LIQUOR STORES 00004397 253209 48733279 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 8115 -16 9,492.43 6,181.00 342971 11612011 11612011 100805 HIRSHFIELD'S 101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F 32.36 PAINT 00001193 252943 003421933 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 32.36 342972 1/612011 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1/5/2011 9:52:46 Page- 12 Business Unit CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING STREET RENOVATION 727.69 253118 545130 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 56.00 253119 545128 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 787.00 253120 545127 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 342973 11612011 125176 HORIZON AGENCY INC. 58,233.00 PREMIUM 253251 91924 2,384.00 PREMIUM 253252 90929 23,906.00 PREMIUM 253253 90928 117,534.00 PREMIUM 253254 90926 202,057.00 342974 11612011 100031 1.494 CORRIDOR COMMISSION 11,382.93 MEMBERSHIP DUES 253255 010111 11,382.93 342975 116/2011 128034 INDEPENDENT OFFICIALS ASSOCIAT 1,728.00 BASKETBALL OFFICATING FEES 253288 121510 1,728.00 342976 116/2011 124628 J E DUNN CONSTRUCTION 6,181.00 PW CONSTRUCTION MGR 253072 8115 -16 6,181.00 342977 11612011 101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 253256 010111 1550.6200 1550.6200 1550.6200 1550.6200 1500.6103 4077.6103 4402.6710 1419.6102 INSURANCE INSURANCE INSURANCE INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CONTRACTUAL SERVICES PW BUILDING RESERVE PROGRAM Subledger Account Description r COST'OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1/5/2011 9:52:46 Page - 13 Business Unit -- VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODSSOLD WINE CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 1/6/2011 - 1/6/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # ` - Doc No Inv No Account No COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 100.00 342978 11612011 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 8,174.85 252951 1454934 5862.5514 8,653.15. 253121 1454876 58415514 357.00 253122 1454977 5842.5515 197.60 253123 1454967 5862.5515 5,679.55 253124 1454966 5862:5514 13.16 253125 1454963 5822.5515 3,584.95 253126 1454962 5822.5514 26,660.26 342979 i 116/2011 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 139.97 252952 1970071 5842.5514 3,359.67 252953 1970069 5842.5513 4,391.52 252954 1970070 5842.5513 10,432.43 252955 1970073 5842.5513 16.60- 252956 481578 5862.5513 _- 8.30- 252957 481577 5842.5513 200.75 253127 1974011 5822.5512 703.72 253128 1974010 5822.5513 409.43 253129 1974009 5822.5513 386.50 253130 1974008 5822.5513 237.64 253131 1974007 5822.5512 543.33 253132 1974012 5822.5512 3,748.27 253133 1974024 5862.5512 1,094:39 253134 1974022 5862.5512 690.09 253135 1974021 5862.5513 736.07 253136 1974020 5862.5513 3,065.14 253137 1974023 5862.5513 30,114.02 34.2980 11612011 111018 KEEPRS INC. 176.31 UNIFORMS 00003841 253022 153537 -02 1470.6558 176.31 Subledger Account Description r COST'OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1/5/2011 9:52:46 Page - 13 Business Unit -- VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODSSOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 342981 1/6/2011 101220 LANO EQUIPMENT INC. 56.26 WIPER ARM AND BLADE 00002035 253065_ 221170 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 89.58 BOLTS, SPINNER, CONTROLLER 00002035 253066 220902 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 178.19 OIL, STAND 00002035 253067 220408 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 324.03 R55CKREG LOG20000 130.00 CITY OF EDINA 252958 11448 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING Council Check Register 130.00 1/6/2011 - 1/6/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 342982 1/6/2011 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 87.80 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 857.09 DRILL BITS, PLOW BOLTS, TY -RAP 00005477 252889 9902312 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SERV GEN - MIS 249.21 FITTINGS, COUPLERS 00005482 253073 9910502 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,106.30 342987 116/2011 342983 11612011 101887 LEAGUE OF MINN HUMAN RIGHTS CO 246.75 ANNUAL DUES 253258 2011 1504.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 1429 5510.6105 246.75 ARENA ADMINISTRATION 342984 11612011 101652 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 342988 285.00 CONFERENCE - JOSH SPRAGUE 253257 147087 1100.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 285.00 342985 1/6/2011 00005509 252944 124810 LIFT BRIDGE BEER COMPANY 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1/5/2011 9:52:46 Page - 14 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION CITY COUNCIL 130.00 252958 11448 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 130.00 342986 11612011 126208 LOVEJOY, NICHOLAS 87.80 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 253284 123110 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 87.80 342987 116/2011 101361 M.IA.M.A. 145.00 2011 DUES 00008081 253261 1429 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA ADMINISTRATION 145.00 342988 11612011 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIP INC. 52.87 ANTENNA 00005509 252944 2110613 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 796.01 SPRING BASES 00005070 253000 2110527 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 345.90 MIRRORS 00005524 253074 2110791 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 826.57 IMPELLER BLADES, SHEAR PINS 00005481 253075 2110713 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,021.35 342989 11612011 127987 MANION, DAN 94.54 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 253016 5405 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET INTERLACHEN 94.54 342990 1/612011 101555 MARSHALL & SWIFT 1,144.82 COMMERCIAL ESTIMATOR 253259 1051890 -2011 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 1,144.82 - 342991 11612011 101146 MATRIX CITY OF EDINA 1/5/2011 9:52:46 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 15 1/6/2011 - 116/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 197.41 253001 607713505 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 197.41 342992 11612011 101267 MBPTA 100.00 2011 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 253260 010111 1495.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS INSPECTIONS 100.00 342993 116/2011 127989 MCGIRL, JOAN 214.64 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 253015 4504 ANDOVER RD 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 214.64 342994 116/2011 125941 MCOUAY INTERNATIONAL 111.07 PICKED UP MOTOR FOR VAV 253210 2540568 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 111.07 342995 1/6/2011 103944 MED COMPASS 2,866.00 MEDICAL EXAMS 253023 16929 1470.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,866.00 342996 1/612011 102281 MENARDS 78.11 GENERAL REPAIR SUPPLIES 00008085 253042 39446 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 78.11 342997 11612011 104156 MENARDS 127.70 FILTERS, ROOFMELT ICE DAMS 00002050 253068 17020 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 127.70 342998 116/2011 104650 MICRO CENTER 8.54 SD CARD 00004398 252890 3078125 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 42.74 WIRELESS KEYBOARD, MOUSE 00004398 252890 3078125 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 40.58 CARD READER, CDS 00009002 253211 3067744 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 91.86 342999 11612011 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 110.73 FINAL PAYMENT 252945 123010 03455.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SS-455 BROR RD SANITARY 184.22 FINAL PAYMENT 252945 123010 03456.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SS-456 MOCCASIN VALLEY SANITAR 254.40 FINAL PAYMENT 252945 123010 05497.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -497 BROR RD WATERMAIN 376.26 FINAL PAYMENT 252945 123010 04367.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS -367 BROR RD STORM 775.59 FINAL PAYMENT 252945 123010 08056.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS L -56 MOCCASIN VALLEY RD 813.38 FINAL PAYMENT 252945 123010 04368.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS -368 MOCCASIN VALLEY STORM 999.26 FINAL PAYMENT 252945 123010 05498.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM-498 MOCCASIN VALLEY WATERMA 1,690.28 FINAL PAYMENT 252945 123010 01375.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -375 BORR RD RECONSTRUCTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 115/2011 9:52:46 Council Check Register Page - 16 1/6/2011 — 1/6/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,008.46 FINAL PAYMENT 252945 123010 03447.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SS-447 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD 3,049.01 FINAL PAYMENT 252945 123010 01376.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -376 MOCCASIN VAL RD RECON 4,451.30 FINAL PAYMENT 252945 123010 08054.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS L -54 BRAEMAR HILLS LIGHTING 7,477.29 FINAL PAYMENT 252945 123010 05489.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -489 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD 13,183.07 FINAL PAYMENT 252945 123010 04354.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS -354 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD 23,936.24 FINAL PAYMENT 252945 123010 01359.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -359 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD 59,309.49 343000 1/612011 121053 MILLER, SUSAN 271.83 PETTY CASH 253282 123110 5621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 271.83 343001 11612011 117724 MINNEAPOLISIST PAUL BUSINESS J 94.00 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 253262 3343141 -2011 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 94.00 343002 1/612011 118609 MINNESOTA CLE 268.00 CONFERENCE FEE 253292 010311 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 268.00 343003 11612011 127290 MINNESOTA DIRTWORKS INC. 11,326.64 FINAL PAYMENT 253088 123010 04362.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS -362 OAKLAWN AVE CULDESAC 11,326.64 343004 11612011 102233 MINNESOTA PRIMA 40.00 2011 DUES 253263 2011 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 40.00 343005 11612011 101559 MINNESOTA STATE FIRE CHIEFS AS 345.00 DUES 253266 010111 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 345.00 343006 11612011 127995 MITTELMARK, JEANNINE - 78.13 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT IN 2008 253093 MELVIN 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 78.13 343007 1/6/2011 102776 MRPA 175.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 253264 010111 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 175.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 253264 010111 1640.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 350.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 253264 010111 5621.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 350.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 253264 010111 5631.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 700.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 253264 010111 1600.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/6/2011 — 1/6/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account. Description 1,750.00 343008 11612011 108538 MSPE 318.00 DUES - WAYNE HOULE 253265 1897056 1240.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE SIGNS & POSTS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ACCESSORIES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 343014 11612011 262 2,324.45 FINAL PAYMENT 253089 010711 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 2,324.45 WM -494 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 318.00 SS -451 PARKWOOD KNOLLS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 343015 11612011 343009 1/612011 .127547 NEAL, SCOTT H. 1,730.83 FINAL PAYMENT 252948 123010 34.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 253212 123010 1120.6107 123010 03451.1705.30 34.50 FINAL PAYMENT 252948 123010 343010 11612011 FINAL PAYMENT 100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 123010 01362.1705.30 53,366.86 372.89 SIGNS 00001073 252946 TI- 0229758 1325.6531 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 372.89 39.98 PENS, SANITIZER, PAPER ROLLS 00002034 343011 11612011 5630.6406 105205 NORTH CENTRAL EMS COOPERATIVE GLOVES, GLASSES, SANITIZER 00002034 253003 544191681001 5630.6406 75.00 DUES 253267 010111 1470.6105 75.00 343012 116/2011 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPP 288.65 STEEL TUBING s 00005483 252947 192658 1553.6585 288.65 343013 1/6/2011 115212 NORTH STAR CHAPTER 145.00 2011 CHAPTER MEETING FEES 253268 010111 1190.6105 145.00 1 10 NORTHERN WOODWORK INC MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE SIGNS & POSTS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ACCESSORIES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 343014 11612011 262 2,324.45 FINAL PAYMENT 253089 010711 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 2,324.45 WM -494 PARKWOOD KNOLLS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SS -451 PARKWOOD KNOLLS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 343015 11612011 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC. BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 1,730.83 FINAL PAYMENT 252948 123010 05494.1705.30 3,959.82 FINAL PAYMENT 252948 123010 03451.1705.30 11,767.39 FINAL PAYMENT 252948 123010 04360.1705.30 35,908.82 FINAL PAYMENT 252948 123010 01362.1705.30 53,366.86 343016 11612011 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 39.98 PENS, SANITIZER, PAPER ROLLS 00002034 253002 543904697001 5630.6406 58.87 GLOVES, GLASSES, SANITIZER 00002034 253003 544191681001 5630.6406 98.85 1/5/2011 9:52:46 Page - 17 Business Unit PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL ADMINISTRATION STREET NAME SIGNS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ASSESSING PW BUILDING CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -494 PARKWOOD KNOLLS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SS -451 PARKWOOD KNOLLS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS -360 PARKWOOD KNOLLS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -362 PARKWOOD KNOLLS GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/6/2011 - 116/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 343017 11612011 127991 OMUNDSON, KEN 18.00 CLASS REFUND 253033 122710 1628.4392.09 SENIOR SPECIAL EVENTS 1/5/2011 9:52:46 Page - 18 Business Unit SENIOR CITIZENS 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 18.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 343018 116/2011 5862.5513 124855 PATRIOT ERECTORS INC. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8,352.60 FINAL PAYMENT 253090 010711 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 8,352.60 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 343019 116/2011 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1,347.52 252959 8287846 -IN 673.76 252960 8287845 -IN 354.75 253138 8288267 -IN 4,245.74 253139 82882594N 646.95 253140 8288287 -IN 7,268.72 343020 11612011 100946 PERA 132.93 VOLUNTARY ASSESSEMENT 252917 441000 90.95 EMPLOYER MATCH 252918 57149 223.88 343021 1/612011 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 3,478.47 252961 2007263 1,415.24 252962 2007265 845.60 252963 2007262 445.60 252964 2007436 163.35 252965 2007437 1,618.55 253141 2010102 161.12 253142 2010094 533.02 253143 2010099 114.24 253144 2010100 304.33 253145 2010101 139.04 253146 2010098 659.80 253147 2010092 451.90 253148 2010091 5.17- 253149 3450725 10,325.09 343022 1/612011 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 272.27 TIRES 00005419 252891 150582 195.00 REPLACE TIRES 00005419 253004 141493 467.27 1/5/2011 9:52:46 Page - 18 Business Unit SENIOR CITIZENS 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1550.6030 PENSIONS 1550.6030 PENSIONS 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5515 5862.5512 5862.5512 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5513 1553.6583 5630.6180 YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/5/2011 9:52:46 Council Check Register Page - 19 1/6/2011 - 1/6/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 343023 11612011 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 2,600.00 PERMIT #939 UTILITY BILLING 253269 010311 5910.6235 POSTAGE GENERAL (BILLING) 2,600.00 343024 1/6/2011 101445 PRIMA 385.00 2011 MEMBERSHIP 253270 10004164 -2011 1120.6105 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 385.00 343025 116/2011 126730 PROGRESSIVE BUILDING SYSTEMS 16,196.09 FINAL PAYMENT 253091 010711 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 16,196.09 343026 1/6/2011 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 789.00 LINERS, TOWELS, TISSUE 00002047 253005 5046 5630.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 578.46 LINERS, TISSUE 00008079 253043 5041 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 1,367.46 343027 11612011 103094 PROTECTION ONE 169.15 JAN - MAR ALARM SERVICE 253271 2011 5511.6250 ALARM SERVICE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 169.15 343028 1/6/2011 100971 QUALITY WINE 561.60 252966 399005 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 486.40 252967 398715 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,614.41 253150 401281 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,216.35 253151 400951 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 497.34 253152 400987 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 935.47 253153 401290 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 7,522.23 253154 401007 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 418.00 253155 400887 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,706.01 253156 400886 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 960.00 253157 400988 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 232.80 253158 401282 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 465.80 253159 400868 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 8.90- 253160 394247 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 16.50- 253161 3934700 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 19,591.01 343029 1/6/2011 127498 RESCUE VAC SYSTEMS 4,105.07 RESCUE VACUUM 00003866 253024 20100902001 421470.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE EQUIPMENT 4,105.07 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/5/2011 9:52:46 Council Check Register Page - 20 1/612011 - 1/6/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 343030 116/2011 126343 RICHFIELD DQ GRILL AND CHILL 215.37 DILLY BARS, CAKES 253213 535 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 26.99 CAKE 253214 539 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 108.60 DILLY BARS 253215 540 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 350.96 343031 1/6/2011 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 103.11 SOFTENER SALT 00003648 253025 00245206 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 24.14 SOFTENER SALT 00003648 253026 00245164 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 127.25 343032 11612011 100982 ROTO - ROOTER 323.00 TOILET REPAIR 00008094 253044 04816052646 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 323.00 343033 11612011 102066 RUST, ROGER 240.00 ICE CARVING DEMO ON 1/9111 253224 010111 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 240.00 343034 116/2011 100987 SA -AG INC 293.18 SAND 00001207 252949 69374 1318.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 293.18 343035 1/612011 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 253.87 RECYCLE USED OIL 00005466 253076 52661658 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 43.00- CREDIT 253077 52772724 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 210.87 343036 116/2011 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 50.00 SERVICE FEE 253272 CF101204 1624:6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 50.00 343037 116/2011 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 11.05 SCREWS 00001192 252950 40898999 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 11.05 343038 1/612011 100991 SCHWAB - VOLLHABER- LUBRATT 825.09 VAV MOTOR 253216 INVO61012 7411.6530 REPAIR PARTS PSTF OCCUPANCY 825.09 343039 1/6/2011 102075 SCULPTURE ICE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/5/2011 9:52:46 Council Check Register Page - 21 1/6/2011 - 1/6/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 123.98 ICE BLOCKS FOR FESTIVAL 253225 010111 5631.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 123.98 343040 11612011 100995 SEH 1,675.89 PLAN REVIEW /INSPECTION 00001197 252892 238817 1001.4722 RENTAL OF PROPERTY GENERAL FUND REVENUES 1,675.89 343041 1/6/2011 100997 SESAC INC. 170.50 MUSICE DUES 00008088 253273 3257250 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA ADMINISTRATION 170.50 343042 11612011 101862 SEVEN CORNERS HARDWARE INC. 264.01 LEVEL 00005328 208669 130955 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 361.21 SAW BLADES, DISCS, HAMMERS 00005328 208670 130954 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 625.22 343043 11612011 118211 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 240.35 PAINTING/REPAIR SUPPLIES 253034 9903 -2 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 240.35 343044 1/6/2011 120997 SHIRTYSOMETHING 191.00 UNIFORMS 00003843 253027 19877 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 191.00 343045 1/612011 105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 672.50 DUCT DETECTOR ALARM SERVICE 253217 66156921 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 405.50 JAN -DEC ALARM MONITORING 253274 74012161 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,078.00 343046 1/612011 102373 SKILLPATH SEMINARS 31.90 WORKBOOK 253290 1568939 1120.6405 BOOKS 8 PAMPHLETS ADMINISTRATION 399.00 HR WORKSHOP REGISTRATION 253291 10141094 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION 430.90 343047 1/6/2011 102935 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION INC 332.50 ICE MAKER REPAIR 00006340 252893 7510 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL 332.50 343048 1/612011 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 950.65 252968 1506360 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 589.00 252969 1474430 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 485.00 252970 1474441 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 115/2011 9:52:46 Council Check Register Page - 22 1/6/2011 - 1/6/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 121.00 253162 1474466 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,194.00 253163 1474468 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,339.65 343049 11612011 106082 SPELLMAN, DEB 50.00 CANCELLATION FEE REFUND 253287 010311 5401.4553 CLUBHOUSE 50.00 343050 1/612011 104672 SPRINT 439.89 CARD READERS 253028 312188813 -037 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 3,561.00 421650.6710 439.89 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 343051 11612011 REPAIR PARTS 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC. 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1553.6584 2,992.50 15" GREEN TRACK 00001127 252894 SM10375 309.39 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 00005459 253006 SF07369 28.13 DIODES 00006374 253048 S182791 33.70 DIODE, RESISTOR 00006371 253049 S182665 18.90 RESISTOR 00006371 253050 S182666 519.18 ALTERNATOR 00006376 253051 S182802 3,901.80 343052 11612011 112668 STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC. 42.70 PLOW OIL 00005484 253007 17091 42.70 343053 11612011 102639 STROHMYER, TOM 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 1/09111 253222 123110 150.00 343054 1/612011 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 1,995.38 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005455 252895 584176 1,995.38 343055 11612011 110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO 128.72 NEXTEL UPGRADE 00001107 253008 29061 128.72 343056 1/612011 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 2,036.00 253164 MVP00198 937.00 253165 MVP00197 588.00 253166 01688 3,561.00 421650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS 5621.6136 1553.6180 5913.6103 5842.5514 5862.5514 5822.5514 GOLF REVENUES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DISTRIBUTION COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 115/2011 9:52:46 Council Check Register Page - 23 1/6/2011 — 1/6/2011 Check # - -Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 343057 116/2011 101027 TARGET BANK 105.63 X- XXX -XX9 -840 SUPPLIES 252896 121810 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 105.63 343058 116/2011 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 426.25 252971 621340 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 85.05 253167 621694 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,293.80 253168 621695 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,805.10 343059 11612011 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 122.34 WELDING MACHINE REPAIR 00005460 253009 333631 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 122.34 343060 1/6/2011 101693 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS 408.97 GIFT CARDS 00006186 252897 26145 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 408.97 343061 116/2011 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 680.90 CUPS, BRUSHES, TRASH CANS 00006379 253052 5125392 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 680.90 343062 1/612011 124504 US HWY 169 CORRIDOR COALITION 3,000.00 2011 DUES 253276 2011 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 3,000.00 343063 11612011 101354 USGA 150.00 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE DUES 253275 2011 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 150.00 343064 11612011 122554 VALLEY NATIONAL GASES LLC 330.15 OXYGEN 00003649 253029 724840 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 330.15 343065 1/612011 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 5,873.49 WATER MAIN REPAIR 00001108 253010 16096 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 5,873.49 343066 11612011 119454 VINOCOPIA 816.00 253169 0034145 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 816.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 572.16 CITY OF EDINA 343070 Council Check Register 101078 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT 1/6/2011 — 116/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 343067 11612011 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 1,371.28 555.36 CONCESSION PRODUCT 00002044 253011 29834011 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 426.31 CONCESSION PRODUCT 00002049 253012 29873797 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 981.67 300.00 DAMAGE DEPOSIT FOR SLED RENTAL 253278 122010 343068 11612011 GENERAL SUPPLIES 124856 WASCHE COMMERCIAL FINISHES INC 300.00 1/512011 9:52:46 Page - 24 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES 10,144.80 FINAL PAYMENT 253092 010711 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 10,144.80 343069 11612011 103266 WELSH COMPANIES LLC 572.16 JAN 2011 MAINTENANCE 253277 010111 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY CENT SVC PW BUILDING SKATING & HOCKEY SKATING & HOCKEY COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS 16.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 253219 111010 1190.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING 16.00 343075 11612011 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 819.55 253170 259541 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 733.90 253171 25954400 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 979.55 253172 259542 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,533.00 343076 11612011 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 572.16 343070 11612011 101078 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT 1,371.28 REPAIRS TO HOIST 00005463 253013 0042203 -IN 1552.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,371.28 343071 11612011 127990 WESTWOOD HILLS NATURE CENTER 300.00 DAMAGE DEPOSIT FOR SLED RENTAL 253278 122010 1622.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 300.00 343072 1/612011 127990 WESTWOOD HILLS NATURE CENTER 40.00 RENTAL FEE FOR KICKSLEDS 253279 122810 1622.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 40.00 343073 11612011 127476 WIDSTRAND, RAY 41.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 253218 123010 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 50.00 COSTUMES FOR PSA 253218 123010 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 91.50 343074 11612011 114588 WILSON, ROBERT C. CENT SVC PW BUILDING SKATING & HOCKEY SKATING & HOCKEY COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS 16.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 253219 111010 1190.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING 16.00 343075 11612011 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 819.55 253170 259541 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 733.90 253171 25954400 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 979.55 253172 259542 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,533.00 343076 11612011 101312 WINE MERCHANTS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/5/2011 9:52:46 Council Check Register Page - 25 1/6/2011 - 1/6/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 206.75 252972 345409 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 366.24 252973 345578 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING. 212.35 252974 345579 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 381.60 253173 346311 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,722.16 253174 346312 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,335.00 253175 345883 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 123.59- 253176 51633 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,100.51 343078 1/6/2011 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 79.90 252975 507306 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,311.55 252976 507305 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 65.10- 252977 819376 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 51.78- 252978 819107 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 102.27- 252979 819106 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 98.10- 252980 819117 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 199.33 253177 508742 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5,777.81 253178 508743 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 19,052.26 253179 508741 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 47.95 253180 508744 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 10,113.42 253181 508736 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 37.05 253182 508737 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,096.73 253183 507327 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 254.31 253184 507304 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6,554.39 253185 508734 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 117.34 253186 509592 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,710.46 253187 508740 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 28.10 253188 508739 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 957.67 253189 508738 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 338.46 253190 509593 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 40.00- 253191 818971 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 173.35- 253192 819162 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 48,146.13 343079 116/2011 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER .03 252981 695336 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING .03 252982 695337 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,767.68 252983 695338 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,928.25 252984 695847 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,135.70 252985 695157 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER BOTH ST SELLING 1,890.68 253193 697757 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/5/2011 9:52:46 Council Check Register Page - 26 1/6/2011 - 1/6/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 5,106.96 253194 696499 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 64.50 253195 696500 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 12,893.83 343080 11612011 127774 WORLDWIDE CELLARS INC. 153.50 253196 10 -25587 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 153.50 343082 11612011 101726 XCEL ENERGY 9.08 51- 6050184 -2 252898 265291885 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 1,183.63 51- 9011854 -4 252899 265335694 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 236.23 51- 4621797 -2 252900 265270885 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 35.66 51- 8976004 -9 252901 265336255 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 22.40 51- 9770163 -6 252902 265350789 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 120.33 51- 9770164 -7 252903 265358177 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 10,740.13 51- 9603061 -0 252904 265343266 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 9.08 51- 65410842 252905 265395207 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,174.41 51- 5547446 -1 252906 265396237 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 60.21 51- 4420190 -3 252907 265102226 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 2,085.12 51- 6223269 -1 252908 265292230 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 395.46 51- 9251919 -0 252909 265337996 5650.6185 LIGHT & POWER PROMENADE 36.85 51- 68922245 252910 265305692 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 517.56 51- 8324712 -5 252911 265323172 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 67.94 51- 6997917 -7 252912 265333802 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 1,287.09 51- 5107681 -4 252913 265270304 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 116.55 51- 8526048 -8 252914 265328829 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 31,790.47 51- 4621797 -2 253053 265465603 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 34.03 51- 89760049 253054 265534625 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 107.20 51- 9608462 -5 253055 265562696 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 6,294.77 51- 6955679-8 253056 265508526 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 562.29 51- 4827232 -6 253057 265470101 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER POOL OPERATION 278.53 51- 8987646 -8 253058 265541677 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 256.07 51- 9337452 -8 253059 265538538 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 57.65 51- 9422326 -6 253060 265540690 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 36.43 51- 8102668 -0 253061 265522115 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 2,323.33 51- 4159265 -8 253220 265258626 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER PSTF OCCUPANCY 4,662.49 51- 5605640 -1 253289 265563924 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER WELL PUMPS 64,500.99 343083 11612011 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 13,405.33 DIESEL FUEL 00001010 252915 415877 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,790.48 UNLEADED FUEL 00001010 252916 415876 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/6/2011 — 1/6/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 891.65 DIESEL FUEL 00006404 253062 414723 5422.6581 GASOLINE 1,155.12 GASOLINE 00006403 253063 414720 5422.6581 GASOLINE 18,242.58 343084 1/612011 101091 21EGLER INC 141.38 HOSE, COUPLINGS 00005525 253078 PC001256061 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 141.38 343085 1/6/2011 101387 HAPPY FACES 200.00 FACE PAINTING - WINTER FESTIVAL 253293 010111 200.00 1,195,327.69 Grand Total 1/5/2011 9:52:46 Page - 27 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,195,327.69 Total Payments 1,195,327.69 R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/512011 9:53:27 Council Check Summary Page - 1 1/612011 - 116/2011 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 370,532.86 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 7,024.32 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 15,000.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 417,472.21 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 7,097.57 05100 ART CENTER FUND 2,432.70 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 8,484.98 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 929.45 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 19,965.55 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 15,302.05 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 11,438,69 05800 LIQUOR FUND 208,469.72 05900 UTILITY FUND 62,064.90 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 39,636.18 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 4,414.31 09900 PAYROLL FUND 5,062.20 Report Totals 1,195,327.69 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects With the requirements of the City Of Edina purchasing policies and Procedures data ///, I r R55CKREG LOG20000 1/1312011 100575 ALL SAFE INC. CITY OF EDINA 1/12/2011 8:59:41 213.79 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 00008003 253349 103164 Council Check Register Page - 1 149.36 KITCHEN HOOD INSPECTION 253741 103173 5421.6230 1/13/2011 -1113/2011 89.86 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 00002056 253742 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 343086 1113/2011 111312011 118536 A & B AUTO ELECTRIC INC. 271.41 62.96 PULLEY, BEARINGS 00005593 253432 58525 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 62.96 343092 111312011 100058 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 343087 111312011 101833 A.T.O.M. RECYCLING 253791 0894 - 002390187 5952.6183 37,683.00 120.00 CONFERENCE FEES 253740 010611 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 120.00 343088 1/13/2011 102403 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT 31.95 DIRT 00001280 253348 121610 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 267.88 DIRT 00001280 253348 121610 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 632.41 DIRT 00001280 253348 121610 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 932.24 343089 1/13/2011 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 28.80 253294 0725022 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 56.00 253295 0724989 5862:5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 85.60 253296 0808367 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 26.00 253297 0725021 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 68.80 253298 0725023 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 18.40 253509 0808434 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 74.20 253623 0725048 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 49.60 253624 0725046 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 27.00 253625 0808435 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 20.00 253626 0725047 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 343090 1/1312011 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 213.79 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 00008003 253349 103164 5511.6406 149.36 KITCHEN HOOD INSPECTION 253741 103173 5421.6230 89.86 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 00002056 253742 103165 5630.6103 453.01 343091 111312011 102715 ALLEGRA EDINA 271.41 PARK PRESS PRINTING 253599 84174 5621.6575 271.41 343092 111312011 100058 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 37,683.00 RECYCLING 253791 0894 - 002390187 5952.6183 37,683.00 343093 111312011 101681 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GRILL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAKES PRINTING RECYCLING CHARGES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION RECYCLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation CITYWORK LICENSES 00001273 253789 6081 545.00 DUES /SUBSCRIPTIONS 343098 111312011 545.00 343094 1/1312011 3418 103870 ANDERSON, SHAWN SQUAD REPAIRS 253743 3430 130.80 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 343099 111312011 130.80 343096 1113/2011 31221 121019 ASCE 230.00 MEMBERSHIP - JACK SULLIVAN 230.00 343096 111312011 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 33.00 33.28 46.03 66.03 68.91 82.60 84.97 90.08 101.98 173.95 238.05 246.15 298.39 298.40 319.55 ano » CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/13/2011 - 1/13/2011 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 253483 _ 085192- 101107 1140.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 253545 123010 253484 090710 253485 010311 253485 010311 253485 010311 253485 010311 253485 010311 253485 010311 253485 010311 253485 010311 253485 010311 253485 010311 253485 010311 253485 010311 253485 010311 253485 010311 253485 010311 253485 010311 253600 1/03111 343097 1113/2011 119206 AZTECA SYSTEMS INC. 19,998.21 CITYWORK LICENSES 00001273 253789 6081 19,998.21 343098 111312011 126019 B & B PRODUCTS I RIGS AND SQUA 160.00 SQUAD MAINTENANCE 253546 3418 559.44 SQUAD REPAIRS 253743 3430 719.44 343099 111312011 100642 BANNERS TO GO 121.26 PARK SIGNAGE 00001126 253433 31221 1301.6406 1260.6105 5821.6182 1481.6182 5111.6182 5210.6182 5422.6182 1470.6182 1628.6182 5841.6162 5861.6182 5420.6182 1551.6182 5511.6182 1301.6182 1552.6182 1645.6182 5620.6182 7411.6182 5913.6406 1400.6215 1400.6215 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 1/12/2011 8:59:41 Page- 2 Business Unit PLANNING GENERAL MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL BOTH ST OCCUPANCY YORK FIRE STATION ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT GOLF DOME PROGRAM MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY CLUB HOUSE CITY HALL GENERAL ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING LITTER REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH PARK PSTF OCCUPANCY DISTRIBUTION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PATHS & HARD SURFACE R55CKREG LOG20000 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1/13/2011 - 1/13/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 121.26 343100 1/1312011 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 381.08 BATTERIES 00005595 253486 6614 1553.6530 381.08 343101 1113/2011 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 20.50 253299 56429500 5862.5515 614.24 253300 56459600 5842.5512 170.44 253301 84656100 5842.5515 361.25 253302 84624000 5842.5515 64.31 253303 84639800 5842.5515 48.78- 253304 84493100 5842.5515 428.67 253305 84656200 5862.5515 155.55 253627 56563600 5822.5512 1,766.18 343102 111312011 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 1,312.00 DEC SNOW REMOVAL 253601 136559 7411.6136 1,312.00 343103 1113/2011 125139 BERNICK'S WINE 780.00 253628 3380 5842.5514 780.00 343104 1113/2011 100649 BEST BUY BUSINESS ADVANTAGE AC 446.23 TVS FOR LIQUOR STORES 00004402 253350 442997 5821.6406 1,212.10 TVS FOR LIQUOR STORES 00004402 253350 442997 5861.6406 1,591.72 TVS FOR LIQUOR STORES 00004402 253350 442997 5841.6406 3,250.05 343105 1/1312011 100653 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC. 9,506.18 QPR ASPHALT PATCH MATERIAL 00001201 253434 17954 1314.6518 9,506.19 QPR ASPHALT PATCH MATERIAL 00001201 253434 17954 5913.6518 19,012.37 343106 1113/2011 115305 BLENKER, DEAN 162.03 UNIFORM PURCHASE 253476 010311 1301.6201 162.03 343107 1/1312011 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 37.50 PRESENTATION EASEL BINDER 253435 65039 1260.6406 Subledger Account Description REPAIR PARTS 1/12/2011 8:59:41 Page- 3 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION BLACKTOP DISTRIBUTION LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/12/2011 8:59:41 Council Check Register Page - 4 1/13/2011 - 1/13/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 38.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 253436 64963 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 67.88 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 253436 64963 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 10.86 OFFICE SUPPLIES 253744 65378 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 33.29 OFFICE SUPPLIES 253744 65378 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 10.79 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 253792 65315 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 15.35 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 253792 65315 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 16.22 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 253792 65315 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 17.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 253792 65315 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 31.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 253792 65315 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 41.65 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 253792 65315 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 45.20 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 253792 65315 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 20.60 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 253793 65252 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 27.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 253793 65252 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 413.87 343108 1113/2011 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 955.50 253510 102033 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 955.50 343109 111312011 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 16.93 ALUMINUM 00005490 253351 475343 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 558.96 MIRROR, MUFFLER 00005490 253437 475250 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 154.74 PIPE, CLAMP 00005494 253487 476799 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 84.28 FILTERS, WIRE ASSEMBLY 00005493 253488 476720 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 10.76 COVER 00005479 253547 472890X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5.96 NOZZLES 00005497 253745 477572 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 831.63 343110 111312011 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 447.50 CONCRETE TESTING 253352 328431 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING 1,482.50 MATERIALS TESTING 253438 328769 10041.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION LS41 LIFT STATION 2 REHAB 160.50 MATERIALS TESTING 253439 328768 01359.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -359 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD 2,090.50 343111 111312011 103279 BRETSON, GREG 89.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 253477 010311 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 89.00 343112 1/1312011 103239 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO. 226.00 DOOR REPAIRS 253794 514937S 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS YORK OCCUPANCY 226.00 CITY OF EDINA 1112/2011 8:59:41 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 5 1/13/2011 - 1/13/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 343113 1/13/2011 127500 CAPITAL MAINTENANCE SERVICES L 878.58 JAN SERVICE 253748 86269 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 878.58 343114 1/1312011 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 3,171.35 253511 14251 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 61.80 253512 14249 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 114.50 253513 14248 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,347.65 343115 111312011 100677 CARGILL INC. 4,476.60 DEICER 00005710 253440 3003941 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 8,699.38 DEICER 00005710 253441 3003449 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 2,967.88 DEICER 00005710 253442 3005818 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 7,748.56 DEICER 00005710 253489 3009110 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 7,629.65 DEICER 00005710 253746 3010870 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 31, 522.07 343116 1/13/2011 103268 CARLSON, DAVID 194.94 UNIFORM PURCHASE 253548 122810 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 194.94 343117 111312011 100223 CASS COUNTY 400.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 253550 010311 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 400.00 343118 1/1312011 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 567.00 253629 88816 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 567.00 343119 1/13/2011 100681 CATCO 212.10 HYDRAULIC CYLINDER 00005489 253490 17 -35491 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 212.10 343120 1113/2011 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 329.36 5528973 -0 253549 5528973 -12/10 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 329.36 343121 1113/2011 128035 CHEEVER, JAMES 141.91 INVISIBLE FENCE REPAIR 253443 010411 01359.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -359 BRAEMAR HILLS N'HOOD 141.91 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/12/2011 8:59:41 Council Check Register Page - 6 1/13/2011 - 1/13/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 343122 111312011 116353 CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS INC 526.97 ENVELOPES 253551 29122 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 526.97 343123 111312011 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 161.08 253306 435519 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 161.08 343124 1/13/2011 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 45,926.50 JOINT POWERS - 4TH QTR 253444 49522 1490.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH 45,926.50 343125 111312011 101850 CITY OF ST. PAUL 500.00 K9 TEAM TRAINING 253552 117035 4607.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 500.00 343126 1113/2011 114648 CIZEK, DARIN 39.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 253553 122910 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 140.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 253747 010611 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 179.00 343127 111312011 128041 CLARKE, BRIAN 88.50 UNIFORM PURCHASE 253602 123010 5620.6201 LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH PARK 88.50 343128 111312011 120747 CMS 90.00 DRUG TESTING 253554 122010532294 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 90.00 343129 1113/2011 100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 208.10 253307 0128023313 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 494.60 253308 0178165828 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 702.70 343130 111312011 101119 COCKRIEL, VINCE 28.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 00001140 253353 123010 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 28.00 343131 1113/2011 101227 COFFEE MILL INC. 364.00 COCOA, CAPPUCCINO 00002053 253555 0743757 -IN 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 364.00 Subledger Account Description EQUIPMENT RENTAL TELEPHONE` TELEPHONE TELEPHONE ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER 1/12/2011 8:59:41 Page- 7 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CLUB HOUSE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE CONTRACTED' REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION c � EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT DWI FORFEITURE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES . CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/13/2011 - 1/13/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation - PO # Doc No Inv-No Account No 343132 1113/2011 100088 COLE INFORMATION SERVICES INC. 363.95 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 253749 0564689 -IN 1400.6151 - 363.95 343133 111312011 120433 COMCAST 88.26 8772 10 614 0177449 253445 177449 -12/10 5420.6188 82.59 8772 10 614 0164959 253446 164959 -12/10 5430.6188 59.00 8772 10 614 0199138 253790 199138 -12/10 5422.6188 229.85 343134 1113/2011 120826 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT 1,201.66 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 253556 322413 - 322415 5862.6122 1,201.67 CABLE TV ADVERTISING - 253556 322413 - 322415 .5822.6122 1,201.67 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 253556 322413 - 322415 5842.6122 3,605.00 343135 1/13/2011 101395 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 8,950.89 OIL 00001198 253354 T7921300052892 1301.6519 8,950.89 343136 111312011 100697 COOL AIR MECHANICAL INC. 580.00 COMPRESSOR REPAIR 00008010 253795 73144 5521.6180 607.25 CHILLER REPAIR 00008009 253796 73146 5521.6180 1,187.25 343137 1/1312011 124910 COURSE TRENDS INC. 100.00 EMAIL MARKETING 00006393 253491 170160 5410.6122 100.00 '343138 111312011 128051 CUSTOM ORDER POLICE SPECIALTIE 3,910.00 ICOP CAMERA SYSTEM 00003188 253750 1878 2340.6710 3,910.00 343139 1113/2011 104020 DALCO 109.74 WIPES 00001454 253355 2278998 1301.6406 1,982.68 ICE MELT 00001189 253356 2284925 4090.6406 1,9ti2.68 ICE MELT 00001165 253357 2284245 4090.6406 1,194.65 TISSUE, WIPES; LINERS 00008093 253358 2286614 5511.6511 24.58- CREDIT 00001454 253751 2243286 1552.6511 12.83 URINAL BLOCKS 00001454 253797 2261465 1552.6511 103.67 FLOOR CARE 00001454 253798 2243286 1552.6511 157:18 TISSUE; WIPES, DEFOAMER 00001454 253799 2282579 1552.6511 Subledger Account Description EQUIPMENT RENTAL TELEPHONE` TELEPHONE TELEPHONE ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER 1/12/2011 8:59:41 Page- 7 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CLUB HOUSE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE CONTRACTED' REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION c � EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT DWI FORFEITURE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES . CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING CITY OF EDINA 1/12/2011 8:59:41 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 8 1/13/2011 - 1/13/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 5,518.85 343140 111312011 112319 DARG BOLGREAN MENK INC. 460.00 STRUCTURAL INVESTIGATION 253447 17762 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 460.00 343141 1113/2011 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 1,574.75 253514 583310 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,218.80 253515 563311 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 44.80 253516 142012 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,212.45 253630 583309 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 9,050.80 343142 1113/2011 118490 DEEP ROCK WATER COMPANY 68.48 622833 WATER 253603 7131142 5620.6406 GENERAL'SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 68.48 343143 111312011 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 73.29 HOSE 00005523 253359 543355 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 417.88 VISE 00005523 253360 543399 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 598.39 FAST CHARGERS 00005492 253752 544616 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 216.32 HOSE REELS, VISE 00005492 253753 544634 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,305.88 343144 111312011 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 4,101.79 DEC 2010 SURCHARGE 253604 10613053060 1495.4380 SURCHARGE INSPECTIONS 4,101.79 343145 1/1312011 101947 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY 1,920.00 CJDN CONNECT CHARGE 253557 P07MD02706001F 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,920.00 343146 111312011 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 96.80 253558 650243624 -12/10 5631.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 120.40 253605 110311867 -12/10 5621.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 22.75 253754 110312148 -12/10 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 22.75 253754 110312148 -12/10 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 22.75 253754 110312148 -12/10 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 285.45 343147 111312011 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 34.23 SCREWS, BITS _ 00001190 253448 07753500 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1/12/2011 8:59:41 Page- 9 Business Unit STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL YORK SELLING DISTRIBUTION GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 1113/2011 - 1/13/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 80.96 SCREWS, BITS 00001190 253448 07753500 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS 115.19 343148 111312011 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 1,000.00 2011 GALA SPONSOR 253755 29377 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1,000.00 2011 GALA SPONSOR 253755 29377 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1,000.00 2011 GALA SPONSOR 253755 29377 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 3,000.00 343149 1113/2011 101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 269.00 RENTAL FOR PARENT FORUM 253559 10568 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 269.00 343150 111312011 102340 EDMUNDS, LIZ 129.00 253309 965 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 129.00 343151 1113/2011 101407 EGAN, MATT 121.20 UNIFORM PURCHASE 253478 010311 5913.6201 LAUNDRY 121.20 343152 111312011 127590 ETTERMAN ENTERPRISES 522.85 SILICONE, BULBS, FUSES 00005369 253361 165624 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 127.13 LIGHT KITS, FUSES 00005475 253800 166757 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 649.98 343153 1113/2011 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 6,051.25 DEC TRANSPORTS 253801 010411 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6,051.25 343154 1/13/2011 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 268.00 253631 W- 305542 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 268.00 343155 1/13/2011 124863 FABCON INC. 7,460.00 REPAIR PRECAST IN CAR WASH 253449 33136 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 7,460.00 343156 111312011 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 27.05 FILTER 00005587 253492 69- 028235 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 24.18 FILTER 00005587 253493 69- 028466 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS - 88.77 BATTERY 00005587 253756 69- 028538 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1/12/2011 8:59:41 Page- 9 Business Unit STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL YORK SELLING DISTRIBUTION GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/13/2011 —1/13/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 140.00 343167 1113/2011 100769 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY 164.75 PADLOCKS 00001274 253362 223298 1301.6406 164.75 343158 1113/2011 106351 FOSTER, REBECCA 85.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 253363 123010 1260.6107 85.00 343159 1/13/2011 127385 GARAGE DOOR STORE 1,520.35 GARAGE DOOR REPAIRS 00005602 253802 17420 1552.6530 1,520.35 343160 1/1312011 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 131.40 VOLLEYBALL T- SHIRTS 253450 81344 4077.6406 898.50 RINK ATTENDANT SWEATSHIRTS 253451 81343 1622.6406 1,029.90 343161 111312011 128040 GIBBS, ELIZABETH 11.75 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 253560 010511 2210.6107 11.75 343162 1/1312011 101351 GILBERT MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS 5,100.00 REPLACE TRACK BOILER VALVE 00002226 253606 39014 5620.6180 5,100.00 343163 111312011 127515 GILGENBACH, JORDAN 183.25 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 253561 010511 2210.6107 183.25 343164 111312011 119737 GLOCK INC. 322.93 MAGAZINEIMISC PARTS 253562 581285 1400.6104 60.00 FIRING PINS, TRIGGERS 00003172 253563 581545 1400.6104 382.93 343165 111312011 103316 GOETSCH, SAM L. 1,020.00 INTERPRETER SERVICE 253803 123110 4078.6103 1,020.00 343166 111312011 124471 GOODPOINTE TECHNOLOGY INC. 1,750.00 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT 253494 2011 - EDINA 1260.6103 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES 1/12/2011 8:59:41 Page - 10 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING & HOCKEY MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INCLUSION PROGRAM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 1/12/2011 8:59:41 Page - 11 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 98.25 253517 CITY OF EDINA 5842.5513 R55CKREG LOG20000 YORK SELLING 5,502.00 253632 125570 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING Council Check Register 98.25 253633 125807 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1/13/2011 - 1113/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 111312011 1,750.00 343167 111312011 249.00 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 253564 123110 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 191.40 DECEMBER TICKETS 00001116 253452 0120488 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 191.40 343173 111312011 102426 HALE, WILLIAM 343168 1113/2011 120929 GOVCONNECTION INC. 200.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 1127111 253739 010711 32.01 KEYBOARD 00004393 253364 47230178 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 106.82 HARD DRIVE 00004404 253365 47330055 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 102967 HALSTEAD, TODD 138.83 343169 1113/2011 UNIFORM PURCHASE 101103 GRAINGER 010311 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 534.41 SHOVELS 00001110 253366 9425955318 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 343176 439.51 SHOVELS 00001110 253367 9425955300 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 153.62 GLOVES, BATTERIES 00001075 253368 9406301979 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 72.00 HAND CLEANER, TOWELS 00001075 253369 9406301987 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 297.22 GLOVES, WIPES 00001075 253370 9406546904 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,496.76 343170 111312011 124711 GRANDVIEW TIRE & AUTO - CAHILL 54.95 ALIGNMENT 00005605 253804 18084 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 54.95 343171 1113/2011 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 1/12/2011 8:59:41 Page - 11 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 98.25 253517 125808 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,502.00 253632 125570 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 98.25 253633 125807 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5,698.50 343172 111312011 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 249.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 253564 123110 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 249.00 343173 111312011 102426 HALE, WILLIAM 200.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 1127111 253739 010711 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 200.00 343174 111312011 102967 HALSTEAD, TODD 150.27 UNIFORM PURCHASE 253479 010311 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 150.27 343176 111312011 123248 HARMONIC RELIEF R55CKREG LOG20000 CENT SERV GEN - MIS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY OF EDINA VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL Council Check Register 1/13/2011 -1/1312011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 1123/11 253738 010711 5621.6136 150.00 343176 111312011 100797 HAWKINS INC. 2,654.25 CHEMICALS 00001216 253371 3184903 5915.6586 2,654.25 343177 1/13/2011 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 4,876.00 NOV 2010 ROOM & BOARD 253565 201011 - EDINA 1195.6225 4,876.00 343178 111312011 106371 HENNEPIN FACULTY ASSOCIATES 2,475.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 253453 QB16074 1470.6103 2,475.08 343179 111312011 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 4,678.90 SERVER FOR WEBSENSE 00004395 253372 48698254 1554.671C 1,013.25 LAPTOP 00004396 253373 48759709 1554.671C 1,169.32 SERVER FOR LIQUOR STORES 00004388 253374 48548821 5820.6406 1,169.32 SERVER FOR LIQUOR STORES 00004388 253374 48548821 5860.6406 2,338.62 SERVER FOR LIQUOR STORES 00004388 253374 48548821 5840.6406 10,369.41 343180 1/1312011 119154 HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES INC. 39.95 TRAFFICE CONTROL SEMINAR 00001143 253495 LTAP 1640.6104 39.95 343181 1/1312011 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 422.05 SOAP 00002232 253607 6580468 5620.6511 54.42 GLASS CLEANER 00002236 253608 6580469 5620.6511 76.80 AIR FRESHENER 00002239 253609 6585394 5620.6511 553.27 343182 1113/2011 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 730.50 253310 545416 5842.5514 722.25 253518 545702 5842.5514 503.50 253634 545701 5862.5514 210.00 253635 545705 5822.5514 2,166.25 343183 111312011 117853 HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS 190.74 CONFERENCE LODGING 253566 010611 1400.6104 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONALSVC - OTHER 1/12/2011 8:59:41 Page - 12 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1/12/2011 8:59:41 Page - 13 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE CITY HALL GENERAL STREET NAME SIGNS EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK 65.00 WARMING HOUSE RENTAL REFUND 253475 010311 1600.4722.08 SHELTER BUILDING RENT PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 253636 65.00 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CITY OF EDINA 36.29 R55CKREG LOG20000 111312011 5862.5515 121404 ISTATE TRUCK CENTER VERNON SELLING 5,967.10 253638 1466009 5842.5514 39.61 OIL TEMP SENSOR 00005548 253375 0242144872:01 Council Check Register REPAIR PARTS 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 39.61 1/13/2011 -1/1312011 343189 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 266.00 DUES - JACK SULLIVAN 253496 190.74 1260.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 266.00 343184 1113/2011 126816 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES 343190 111312011 105198 INTERNATIONAL ASSOC. FOR PROPE 48.53 SUPPLIES/TOOLS 253805 121310 1301.6556 TOOLS 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 86.33 SUPPLIES/TOOLS 253805 121310 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 317.82 SUPPLIES/TOOLS 253805 121310 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 343191 111312011 452.68 127708 J & R CUSTOM CLEANING LLC 343185 111312011 CLEANING 253611 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 5620.6201 LAUNDRY 1,531.53 553.29 CAL -HYPO TABLETS 00002230 253610 10121618 5620.6545 CHEMICALS 1/1312011 553.29 343186 1113/2011 101697 HORIZON GRAPHICS INC 968.85 PARTY INVITATIONS FOR RESALE 253757 30394 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 968.85 343187 1/1312011 112935 HUNZELMAN, RENEE 1/12/2011 8:59:41 Page - 13 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE CITY HALL GENERAL STREET NAME SIGNS EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK 65.00 WARMING HOUSE RENTAL REFUND 253475 010311 1600.4722.08 SHELTER BUILDING RENT PARK ADMIN. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ENGINEERING GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 2,837.10 253636 65.00 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 36.29 343188 111312011 5862.5515 121404 ISTATE TRUCK CENTER VERNON SELLING 5,967.10 253638 1466009 5842.5514 39.61 OIL TEMP SENSOR 00005548 253375 0242144872:01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 39.61 343189 1/1312011 105051 INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION EN 266.00 DUES - JACK SULLIVAN 253496 010411 1260.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 266.00 343190 111312011 105198 INTERNATIONAL ASSOC. FOR PROPE 50.00 MEMBERSHIP - S. QUIST 253758 80619 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 50.00 MEMBERSHIP - M. BENTLEY 253759 81483 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 100.00 343191 111312011 127708 J & R CUSTOM CLEANING LLC 1,531.53 CLEANING 253611 500 5620.6201 LAUNDRY 1,531.53 343192 1/1312011 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ENGINEERING GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 2,837.10 253636 1466000 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 36.29 253637 1466001 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,967.10 253638 1466009 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,004.50 253639 1466002 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/12/2011 8:59:41 Council Check Register Page - 14 1/13/2011 - 1/13/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO .# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 301.80 253640 1507670 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 21.50 253641 1466003 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 10,168.29 343195 1113/2011 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 392.48 253311 1974013 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,265.44 253312 1974019 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,973.12 253313 1974014 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 22.11 253314 1974015 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,454.72 253315 1974016 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,415.69 253316 1974018 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 936.31 253317 1974017 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,285.14 253519 1975702 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1.12 253520 1975704 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 6,312.58 253521 1975707 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,278.56 253522 1975705 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,959.24 253523 1975703 5842,5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6,378.55 253524 1975706 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 14.30 253568 1948232DUE 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,145.27 253642 1977859 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 606.94 253643 1977861 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.12 253644 1977848 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,431.57 253645 1977863 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,389.29 253646 1977664 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 228.14 253647 1977862 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 105.12 253648 1977853 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 121.12 253649 1977654 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 7,077.82 253650 1977857 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 67.11 253651 1977858 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 31.37 253652 1977846 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX BOTH ST SELLING 1,437.30 253653 1977845 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 413.53 253654 1977844 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 115.34 253655 1977843 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,437.29 253656 1977842 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,766.75 253657 1977841 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 935.54 253658 1977660 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2.24 253659 1977847 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,793.25 253660 1977856 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 527.77 253661 1977851 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,085.54 253662 1977852 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,712.82 253663 1977855 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/12/2011 8:59:41 Council Check Register Page - 15 1/13/2011 - 1/13/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO '# Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 4.67- 253664 482500 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6.66- 253665 482501 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 21.34- 253666 482502 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 12.11- 253667 482503 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 18.68- 253668 482504 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7.25- 253669 482505 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 33.82- 253670 482506 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 18.40- 253671 482507 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7.83- 253672 482573 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6.67- 253673 482499 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 67,984.17 343196 1/13/2011 124192 JPERZEL & ASSOCIATES 225.00 CONSULTING 253567 30581 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 225.00 343197 111312011 113212 KENDELL DOORS & HARDWARE INC. 89.00 CUT KEYS 253569 99238 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 89.00 343198 1/13/2011 100841 KEPRIOS, JOHN 116.65 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 253376 122810 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 116.65 343199 111312011 118456 KNOLLMAIER, LAURA 242.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 253377 123110 5631.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 242.50 343200 1/13/2011 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 614.96 DWI TOW CHARGES (4) 253378 010411 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DWI FORFEITURE 614.96 343201 1113/2011 128049 LAVELLE, KATHY 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 1/16/11 253736 010711 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 343202 1113/2011 120734 LAW ENFORCEMENT TECHNOLOGY GRO 256.50 2011 CANINE TRACKER 253769 12360 4607.6160 DATA PROCESSING EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 256.50 343203 1/13/2011 100862 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 467.29 HEAT SEAL, WEATHER PACK 00001067 253379 9835765 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 100857 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC. CITY OF EDINA 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,230.66 CROSS TUBE, LOOP ASSEMBLY Council Check Register 253382 00045736 REPAIR PARTS 1,230.66 1/13/2011 — 1/13/2011 5841.6406 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 66.98 PINS 00001179 253380 9898073 1301.6556 TOOLS 570.64 TAPS, NUTS, TY -RAP 00005517 253381 9919561 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 99.52 DRILL BIT 00005477 253454 9919560 1553.6556 TOOLS 446.06 WASHERS, NUTS, BOLTS 00005310 253455 9927150 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,650.49 51.10 CELL PHONE REIMBURSEMENT 343204 1113/2011 124810 LIFT BRIDGE BEER COMPANY 51.10 253674 11522 343205 111312011 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 100857 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC. REPAIR PARTS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,230.66 CROSS TUBE, LOOP ASSEMBLY 00005074 253382 00045736 REPAIR PARTS 1,230.66 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5861.6406 343206 111312011 118625 LORENTZ, MICHAEL 101.95 UNIFORM PURCHASE 253480 010311 101.95 343207 1113/2011 125208 LOVEJOY, NICHOLAS 51.10 CELL PHONE REIMBURSEMENT 253806 011011 51.10 343208 111312011 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,010.51 253318 100749 1,080.94 253319 100876 2,091.45 343209 111312011 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIP INC. 18,895.50 SNOQUIP XX BLOWER 00005549 253383 1110046 947.04 DRIVE LINE ASSEMBLY 00005519 253456 2110755 512.87 YOKE AND SPLINE 00005570 253457 2110770 1,953.94 WELDMENTS, BUSHINGS, PINS 00005461 253570 2110859 1,950.59 BELT, BUSHINGS, TOW BAR ASSY 00005465 253760 2110860 513.91 HYDRAULIC MOTOR 00005526 253761 2110854 24,773.85 343210 1/1312011 120502 MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SOLUTIO 2,490.19 UPDATE VIDEO EQUIPMENT 253807 1657 7,395.75 253808 1658 3,083.34 253809 1659 12,969.28 5822.5514 1553.6530 1301.6201 1554.6230 5822.5515 5862.5515 1/1212011 8:59:41 Page - 16 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING STREET EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1/12/2011 8:59:41 Page - 17 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC HEALTH REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL LICENSES & PERMITS DISTRIBUTION LICENSES & PERMITS DISTRIBUTION CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 1/1312011 — 1/1312011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 343211 111312011 122878 MARTTI, DOROTHEA 425.00 HOSTING FEE 253571 152 2210.6103 425.00 343212 1113/2011 119992 MCCARTHY WELL COMPANY 3,951.50 WELL REPAIR 00006493 253497 23337 5422.6180 3,951.50 343213 1113/2011 125941 MCQUAY INTERNATIONAL 1,504.00 INSPECTION CONTRACT 253762 31069 5620.6230 1,504.00 343214 1113/2011 103232 MEHA 120.00 CONFERENCE FEE (3) 253498 010611 1490.6104 120.00 343215 111312011 102281 MENARDS 68.81 WOOD, PAINT 00001282 253458 29947 1552.6530 68.81 343216 111312011 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME 365,307.57 SEWER SERVICE 253763 0000949395 5922.6302 365,307.57 343217 1113/2011 104650 MICRO CENTER 17.08 MICRO SO CARDS 00004403 253384 3096299 1470.6406 101.45 DVDS 253572 3102412 1400.6160 118.53 343218 1/1312011 127263 MID AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTEMS 4,002.96 STORAGE CABINETS 00001216 253810 715368 421305.6710 4,002.96 343219 1113/2011 101604 MIDWEST GANG INVESTIGATORS ASS 275.00 CONFERENCE FEE 253573 010511 1400.6104 275.00 343220 111312011 102582 MINN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 10.00 PRESSURE VESSEL FEE 00001111 253385 B42ABR00148471 5913.6260 20.00 PRESSURE VESSEL FEES 00001112 253386 B42ARB00144441 5913.6260 30.00 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1/12/2011 8:59:41 Page - 17 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC HEALTH REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL LICENSES & PERMITS DISTRIBUTION LICENSES & PERMITS DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/1212011 8:59:41 Council Check Register Page - 18 1/13/2011 - 1/13/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 343221 111312011 101912 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICU 60.00 MINNESOTA GROWN MEMBERSHIP 253767 010311 5631.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 60.00 343222 1/1312011 101912 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICU 20.00 PESTICIDE APPLICATOR RENEWALS 253768 011011 1640.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 70.00 PESTICIDE APPLICATOR RENEWALS 253768 011011 1640.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 90.00 343223 111312011 101899 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC 100.00 HAZARDOUS MATERIAL FEE 253499 2706000072010M- 5310.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POOL ADMINISTRATION 40547 100.00 343224 111312011 101537 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AG 2,100.00 COLL SYS OPERATORS CONF 253764 REGISTRATION 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 2,100.00 343225 111312011 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 10.06 PLASTIC, GALV NIPPLE 00001275 253387 0086818 -IN 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 10.06 343226 111312011 102775 MN DNR ECO- WATERS 685.00 DNR WATER WELL PERMIT 253574 2003/3049 5422.6189 SEWER & WATER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 685.00 343227 1/1312011 102775 MN DNR ECO- WATERS 140.00 DNR WATER USAGE FEE 00001145 253575 1960/0231 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 140.00 343228 1113/2011 102775 MN DNR ECO- WATERS 280.00 2 LAKE PERMITS 253770 010611 5933.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS PONDS & LAKES 280.00 343229 111312011 102775 MN DNR ECO- WATERS 31,780.20 REPORT OF WATER USAGE 253811 123110 5915.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS WATER TREATMENT 31,780.20 343230 111312011 127579 MONEY MAILER OF MINNEAPOLIS WE 233.33 DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING 253765 5206 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 233.33 DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING 253765 5206 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 233.34 DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING 253765 5206 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/13/2011' - 1/13/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 700.00 343231 1/13/2011 108537 MOORE, JOEL 272.45 UNIFORM PURCHASE 253576 123110 1466.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 1/12/2011 8:59:41 Page - 19 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL - REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 272.45 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 343232 1/1312011 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 283.38 CONDENSER ASSEMBLY 00005481 253388 487927FSW 1553.6530 19.45 BRACKET 00005481 253389 487924 -1F6W 1553.6530 106.88- CORE RETURN 00005375 253766 CM486798F6W 1553.6530 195.95 343233 1/13/2011 108668 MORRIS, GRAYLYN 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 1/20/11 253737 010711 5621.6136 150.00 343234 1/13/2011 128038 MSCIC 100.00 CONFERENCE FEE - 253577 010411 1400.6104 100.00 343235 1/13/2011 128039 NAME PLATE SERVICES 29.85 ENGRAVED NAME PLATES 253578 010411- 1400.6104 29.85 343236 1113/2011 103665 NATIONAL ACADEMIES OF EMERGENC 50.00 EMD RECERTIFICATION 00003174 253579 136410 2310.6104 50.00 343237 1/13/2011 100921 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE 32.16 CAMERA LENS 253771 0104107SOJQ 2210.6406 32.16 343238 1113/2011 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 169.50 253675 63849 5842.5513. 498.00 253676 63850 5862.5513 667.50 343239 111312011 101967 NIOA 80.00 DUES - MOLLY ANDERSON 253772 010711 1400.6105 80.00 343240 1113/2011 100292 NORTHERN ESCROW INC. 1/12/2011 8:59:41 Page - 19 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL - REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL: POLICE DEPT. GENERAL _ E911 COMMUNICATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL- R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/13/2011 - 1/1312011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 61 696.21 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 11 253812 011411 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1/1212011 8:59:41 Page - 20 Business Unit PW BUILDING FINANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION BUILDINGS EB /CL BALANCE SHEET SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING BANK SERVICES CHARGES GENERAL (BILLING) 61,696.21 343241 1113/2011 120166 NORTHSTAR CHAPTER APA 50.00 MEMBERSHIP - VICKI OLSON 253773 3262476 1160.6105 50.00 343242 111312011 125184 NORTHSTAR MEDIA SERVICES LLC 80.16 KSTP MOVIE FILE/SAFE DRIVING 253580 6392 1400.6103 80.16 343243 111312011 105007 NU- TELECOM 557.72 JAN SERVICES 253774 80339433 1400.6230 557.72 343244 1/1312011 116114 OCE 97.56 NOV MAINTENANCE 00001229 253459 987335506 1552.6103 97.56 343245 111312011 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 199.75 CASH REGISTER 00002033 253390 543904312001 5631.6513 66.34 LABELER, PLANNERS 00002038 253391 545267333001 5631.6513 11.61 CALENDARS 00002038 253392 545267531001 5631.6513 27.18 DESK PADS 00006034 253460 1293937800 5410.6513 304.88 343246 111312011 115669 ON CALL SERVICES 3,280.00 BRICK REPAIR 253612 2132 5600.1720 5,500.00 MAINTENANCE /REPAIR CONTRACT 253775 2130 5620.6230 8,780.00 343247 111312011 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 403.00 253525 8289018 -IN 5822.5513 1,397.50 253526 8289003 -IN 5842.5513 224.75- 253527 8288727 -CM 5822.5513 622.53 253677 8289046 -IN 5842.5513 829.50 253678 8289019 -IN 5862.5513 33.25 253679 8289022 -IN 5862.5515 3,061.03 343248 111312011 125492 PAYPAL INC. 39.95 DEC FEE 253393 9744704 5910.6155 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1/1212011 8:59:41 Page - 20 Business Unit PW BUILDING FINANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION BUILDINGS EB /CL BALANCE SHEET SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING BANK SERVICES CHARGES GENERAL (BILLING) R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 39.95 343249 1/13/2011 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 162.50 374.58 343250 1/13/2011 125978 PETSMART#459 94.08 K9 SUPPLIES 94.08 343252 1/1312011 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 1,228.11 1,972.28 1,777.35 121.12 2,845.26 1,939.36 543.22 628.50 1,226.26 1,121.75 41.07 235.19 418.57 45.07 1,014.39 814.48 1.12 1,809.34 114.24 1,996.44 3,334.64 1,939.36 161.12 4.48 3.36 72.12- 25,235.48 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/13/2011 - 1/13/2011 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 253500 64237225 253581 64237211 253582 64237212 00003173 253583 T -2171 253320 2010096 253321 2010097 253322 2010095 253323 2010093 253680 2012848 253681 2012838 253682 2012849 253683 2012850 253684 2012846 253685 2012843 253686 2012845 253687 2012832 253688 2012833 253689 2012829 253690 2012828 253691 2012831 253692 2012830 253693 2012844 253694 2012840 253695 2012839 253696 2012842 253697 2012836 253698 2012834 253699 2012835 253700 2012841 253701 3446822 253702 3438705 5421.5510 5630.5510 5630.5510 4607.6406 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 5842.5512 5842.5515 5822.5512 5822.5513 5822.5515 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5512 5842.5513 5842.5515 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES 1/12/2011 8:59:41 Page - 21 Business Unit GRILL CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 1/12/2011 8:59:41 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 22 1113/2011 - 1113/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 343253 111312011 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 280.00 253324 11402 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 280.00 343254 111312011 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 808.90 PEST CONTROL 00008002 253501 2078309 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 44.52 PEST CONTROL 253613 2126849 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 853.42 343255 111312011 120988 PLYMOUTH FRAMERY 214.55 PHOTO FRAMING 253584 550051 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 214.55 343256 111312011 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 502.65 TIRES 00005588 253502 167018 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 502.65 343257 111312011 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 350.00 NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 253473 010411 1628.6235 POSTAGE SENIOR CITIZENS 350.00 343258 111312011 125979 PRECISE MRM LLC 16,792.73 UPS SYSTEMS 00001171 253813 301360 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT 1,510.72 UPS ACCESS POINT KIT 00001171 253814 301444 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT 18,303.45 343259 111312011 124831 PRESSWRITE PRINTING INC. 104.07 WATER NOTICE DOOR HANGERS 00001114 253461 057571 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 104.07 343260 1113/2011 102354 PRO GUARD SPORTS INC. 344.33 TAPE, LACES, MOUTHGUARDS 00008099 253815 303782 5510.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ARENA ADMINISTRATION 344.33 343261 111312011 105690 PRO -TEC DESIGN INC. 15.25 ALARM REPAIR 253614 57006 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 15.25 343262 1113/2011 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 181.02 LINERS, WIPES 00002055 253585 5066 5630.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,152.38 ROLL TOWEL, TISSUE, LINERS 00002219 253615 5031 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,035.19 WASTE RECEPTACLES 00002240 253616 5055 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/12/2011 8:59:41 Council Check Register Page - 23 1/13/2011 - 1113/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,837.79 ICE MELT, LINERS, GLOVES 00002237 253617 5068 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 4,206.38 343263 1113/2011 100971 QUALITY WINE 2,089.66 253528 403277 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 583.37 253529 404183 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 148.53 253530 404123 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,477.48 253531 403915 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 223.20 253532 404181 -CO 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5,120.08 253533 403815 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,536.00 253534 402267 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 834.93 253535 404122 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 89.60 253536 404180 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,575.00 253537 403903 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 343.59 253703 403904 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 380.90 253704 404182 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,121.23 253705 403916 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 16,523.57 343264 1/13/2011 123898 QWEST 342.04 952 927 -8861 253503 8861 -12/10 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 55.62 952929 -0297 253504 0297 -12110 4090.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 40.06 952 922 -9246 253586 9246 -12/10 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 55.82 253776 122810 5911.6188 TELEPHONE WELL PUMPS 58.52 253776 122810 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 113.39 253776 122810 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 117.14 253776 122810 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 138.03 253776 122810 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 165.77 253776 122810 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 228.05 253776 122810 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 234.63 253776 122810 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 266.32 253776 122810 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 2,054.87 253776 122810 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 3,870.26 343265 1113/2011 117692 R & B CLEANING INC. 2,511.56 RAMP STAIRWELL CLEANING 00001290 253777 889 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 2,511.56 343266 1113/2011 100972 R &R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN 1 629.98 ZAMBONI PARTS 00008000 253778 0046716 -IN 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 629.98 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/1212011 8:59:41 Council Check Register Page - 24 1/13/2011 — 1/13/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 943267 111312011 104642 RCM SPECIALTIES INC. 1,004.56 CRS2 00001276 253394 3070 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,004.56 343268 1113/2011 100975 RED WING SHOE STORE 99.95 SAFETY BOOTS 00005601 253779 725000001315 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 246.42 SAFETY BOOTS 00005601 253779 725000001315 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 260.46 SAFETY BOOTS 00005601 253779 725000001315 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 294.46 SAFETY BOOTS 00005601 253779 725000001315 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 773.36 SAFETY BOOTS 00005601 253779 725000001315 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,674.65 343269 111312011 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 151.00 LEAK REPAIR 00006187 253462 56431 5420.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLUB HOUSE 151.00 343270 1/1312011 100982 ROTO - ROOTER 415.00 DRAIN CLEANING 253618 04816050238 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 415.00 343271 1/13/2011 100985 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO 3,420.00 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 00001199 253395 E02048 1301.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 3,420.00 343272 1/1312011 104087 SAFE ASSURE CONSULTANTS INC. 1,689.96 EMPLOYEE SAFETY TRAINING 253780 326 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 2,209.32 EMPLOYEE SAFETY TRAINING 253780 326 1640.6027 TRAINING PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 4,158.72 EMPLOYEE SAFETY TRAINING 253780 326 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 8,058.00 343273 1/1312011 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 113.07 RECYCLE PARTS WASHER 00005598 253463 923451259 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 113.07 343274 111312011 122530 SATO AMERICA INC. 50.47 EVIDENCE PRINTER SUPPLIES 253781 30294133 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50.47 343275 1/13/2011 103015 SCHEERER, JOHN 42.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 253587 123110 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 42.00 CITY OF EDINA 1/1212011 8:59:41 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 25 1/13/2011 - 1/13/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doe No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 343276 1/1312011 118092 SCHMIDT, JIM 139.96 UNIFORM PURCHASE 253481 010411 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 139.96 343277 111312011 128052 SECAP 170.80 POSTAGE MACHINE SUPPLIES 253816 81127129 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 170.80 343278 111312011 100995 SEH 2,731.47 SANITARY SEWER INSPECTION 253464 238499 5923.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COLLECTION SYSTEMS 1,367.07 WHPP UPDATE 253465 238862 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 4,098.54 343279 1113/2011 103237 SHIRLEY, TOM 89.70 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 253396 123010 5631.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 89.70 343280 111312011 102841 SHUTTERS'N SHADES 790.00 SHADE REPAIRS 00006189 253588 SNS27283 5430.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 790.00 343281 1/13/2011 1 120458 SIEMENS WATER TECHNOLOGIES COR 533.25 WATER SOFTENER REPAIR 00008007 253817 3256685 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 210.09 WATER SOFTENER REPAIR 00008008 253818 3256596 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 743.34 343282 1/1312011 121382 SIGNATURE AQUATICS 270.60 CHLORINE FEEDER REPAIR 00002234 253782 803 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 270.60 343283 111312011 105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 333.00 FIRE SPRINKLER REPAIR 00006188 253466 66182988 5420.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLUB HOUSE 333.00 343284 1113/2011 101000 SIR SPEEDY 49.70 BUSINESS CARDS 253589 67329 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 49.70 343285 111312011 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 1,025.00 253325 1474467 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 881.50 253706 1474511 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/13/2011 -1/1312011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,020.96 253707 1474513 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1/1212011 8:59:41 Page - 26 Business Unit VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKING RAMP REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,927.46 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS 343286 1113/2011 125169 SPECTER INSTRUMENTS 395.00 WIN -911 SUPPORT CONTRACT 00001113 253505 1012017033 5913.6103 395.00 343287 1113/2011 101021 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC 160.86 PROPANE 00001285 253467 122710 1553.6581 223.24 PROPANE 00001285 253467 122710 1301.6406 384.10 343288 111312011 101004 SIPS COMPANIES 524.07 PIPE 00001022 253397 52286698.002 1375.6406 524.07 343289 111312011 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC. 258.02 BUSHINGS, PINS 00005527 253398 S183469 1553.6530 25.33 CAPSCREWS 00005488 253399 S183401 1553.6530 37.99 CAPSCREW BOLTS 00005488 253506 S183483 1553.6530 173.27 OIL FILTERS 00005495 253507 S183544 1553.6530 494.61 343290 111312011 128037 STEFANCHUK, MARK 160.00 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 253474 010411 5900.2015 160.00 343291 111312011 112668 STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC. 250.09 HARNESSES 00005533 253783 17415 1553.6530 250.09 343292 111312011 101015 STREICHERS 89.99 OUTERSHELL 253590 1798816 1400.6203 384.73 GUN CASE 253591 1798097 1400.6104 57,70 GUN CLEANING BRUSHES 253619 1800198 7412.6406 532.42 343293 111312011 117992 STRINGER BUSINESS SYSTEMS 9.36 COPIER USAGE 253592 7949909 1400.6230 9.36 343294 111312011 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 1/1212011 8:59:41 Page - 26 Business Unit VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKING RAMP REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 1,085.00 CITY OF EDINA MVP00277 5822.5514 1,085.00 Council Check Register 343297 111312011 1/13/2011 - 1/13/2011 102471 THOLEN, BRIAN Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description UNIFORM PURCHASE 314.33 EDINA LIQUOR AD 253593 1293460 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 172.01 314.33 EDINA LIQUOR AD 253593 1293460 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 111312011 314.34 EDINA LIQUOR AD 253593 1293460 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 943.00 62.80 253709 622671 343295 1/1312011 110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO 1,135.65 253710 187.79 VEHICLE CHARGERS, CLIP 00001277 253400 28999 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 16.09 PHONE ANTENNA 253620 29100 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 203.88 343296 1/13/2011 421.13 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 253508 748812 5510.6105 1/12/2011 8:59:41 Page - 27 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING GENERAL MAINTENANCE EDINBOROUGH PARK COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,085.00 253708 MVP00277 5822.5514 1,085.00 343297 111312011 102471 THOLEN, BRIAN 172.01 UNIFORM PURCHASE 253594 122410 1400.6203 172.01 343298 111312011 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 62.80 253709 622671 5862.5515 1,135.65 253710 622670 5862.5514 1,198.45 343299 111312011 101826 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP. 421.13 QUARTERLY MAINTENANCE 00008096 253508 748812 5510.6105 421.13 343300 111312011 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 291.66 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 253784 2010 -56452 5862.6122 291.67 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 253784 2010 -56452 5822.6122 291.67 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 253784 2010 -56452 5842.6122 875.00 343301 111312011 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLAN 3,331.73 2010 BRIDGE MGMT SERVICES 253468 000201003800 1260.6103 3,331.73 343302 1113/2011 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 10.20 WELDING GAS 00005603 253819 414824 1553.6580 10.20 343303 1113/2011 101693 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS 1/12/2011 8:59:41 Page - 27 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING GENERAL MAINTENANCE EDINBOROUGH PARK COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/12/2011 8:59:41 Council Check Register Page - 28 1/13/2011 - 1/13/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 14.25 MONTHLY FTP FOLDER 253785 26185 5820.6160 DATA PROCESSING 50TH STREET GENERAL 14.25 MONTHLY FTP FOLDER 253785 26185 5840.6160 DATA PROCESSING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 14.25 MONTHLY FTP FOLDER 253785 26185 5860.6160 DATA PROCESSING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 42.75 343304 111312011 103048 U.S. BANK 425.00 PAYING AGENT 253469 2773560 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 2,100.00 TRUST & AGENT FEE 253470 2773397 3101.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL DEBT SERVICE REVENUES 2,525.00 343305 111312011 115379 U.S. BANK 17.90 NET ZERO 253820 010411 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 38.20 INTERNET 253820 010411 1550.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 56.10 343306 1113/2011 103973 ULINE 23.35 TAPE DISPENSER 253595 35832798 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 23.35 343307 111312011 122221 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC. 298.40 LIFT BATTERY 253621 90896948 -001 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 298.40 343308 111312011 119476 USPCA REGION 12 60.00 K9 CERTIFICATION 253596 010511 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 60.00 343309 111312011 119476 USPCA REGION 12 40.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 253786 011011 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 40.00 343310 111312011 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 3,254.49 WATER MAIN REPAIR 00001115 253471 16122 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 3,254.49 343311 111312011 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 559.53 CONCESSION PRODUCT 00002054 253787 29916084 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 559.53 343312 1113/2011 104820 VOELKER, JAMES 69.98 UNIFORM PURCHASE 253482 010311 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 69.98 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 343313 111312011 259915 -00 117074 WEIERKE, DAVID COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 649.00 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 649.00 253326 343314 111312011 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 253327 346391 526.30 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 253713 549.90 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 736.40 346982 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,812.60 253715 343315 1/13/2011 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 253716 346981 128.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 253717 429.00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.12 49692 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 983.76 253719 51463 5842.5513 105.12 YORK SELLING 121.10- 253334 4,142.21 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.12 253335 510555 5842.5513 435.00- YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 1/13/2011 - 1/13/2011 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 00001144 253472 010511 1640.6104 Subledger Account Description CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1/12/2011 8:59:41 Page - 29 Business Unit PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 253538 259914 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 253711 259915 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 253712 260023 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 253326 346390 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 253327 346391 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 253713 346980 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 253714 346982 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 253715 346978 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 253716 346981 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 253717 346979 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 253718 49692 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 253719 51463 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 343316 1113/2011 117482 WINECONNECT INC. 159.24 WEB - JAN 2011 253788 722 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 159.24 343318 1113/2011 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 320.91 253328 508735 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 639.80 253329 510717 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 416.21 253330 510554 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,038.75 253331 509738 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 121.00 253332 510330 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 760.72 253333 510718 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 121.10- 253334 819484 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 559.85 253335 510555 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 77.59 253539 512055 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 74.10 253540 512053 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 78.15 253541 512058 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 111.01 253542 512059 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 133.15- 253543 819472 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 134.02 253720 512051 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/12/2011 8:59:41 Council Check Register Page - 30 1/13/2011 - 1/13/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 12,396.56 253721 512048 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 10,730.53 253722 512049 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 78.15 253723 512050 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 22,593.62 253724 512056 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 523.27 253725 509693 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 12,520.69 253726 512057 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,359.59 253727 512052 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,576.44 253728 512054 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 92.38- 253729 819981 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 527.87- 253730 819821 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 338.46- 253731 819823 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 67,898.00 343319 1113/2011 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 100.00 253336 697783 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,411.50 253337 697782 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 60.00 253338 697538 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 956.85 253339 697537 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,246.00 253544 698553 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 60.00- CREDIT ON ACCT 253597 ACCT 41137 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 1,822.30 253732 699932 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,784.05 253733 698068 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,718.38 253734 700138 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 11,039.08 343320 111312011 101726 XCEL ENERGY 375.55 51- 5634814 -2 253340 265651317 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 115.34 253341 265650500 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS 291.10 51- 6137136 -8 253342 265990520 5430.6185 LIGHT & POWER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 20,240.12 51- 4888627 -1 253343 265974801 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS . 837.84 51- 6979948 -4 253344 265846622 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1,271.37 51- 6979948 -4 253344 265846622 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER - VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,949.34 51- 6979948 -4 253344 265846622 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK OCCUPANCY 167.59 51- 6229265 -9 253345 265655626 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 1,984.40 51- 6229265 -9 253345 265655626 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 365.36 51- 6046826 -0 253346 265653071 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5,266.53 51- 4966303 -6 253347 265636772 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 56.86 51 -6692497 -0 253598 265397119 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 1,359.69 51- 5847121 -5 253821 266143955 5914.6185 LIGHT & POWER TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 34,281.09 343321 1113/2011 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1/1212011 8:59:41 Council Check Register Page - 31 1/13/2011 — 1/13/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier hExplanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 21,832.31 DIESEL FUEL 00001010 253401 416709 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 21,832.31 343322 1/1312011 120099• Z WINES USA LLC 82.50 253735 10037 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 82.50 343323 1113/2011 101091 ZIEGLER INC 5,940.00 GRADER RENTAL 00001202 253822 H8688001 1301.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 5,940.00 1,165,079.04 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,165,079.04 Total Payments 1,165,079.04 i We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing polipies,and procedures dar, w ce s Asvr fa City Manager 1/12/2011 9:00:25 Page- 1 CITY OF EDINA R55CKSUM LOG20000 Council Check Summary 1/13/2011 - 1/13/2011 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 216,319.15 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 983.98 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 4,574.96 03100 GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FUND, 2,100.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 71,235.98 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 41,201.91 05100 ART CENTER FUND 46.03 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 66.03 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 100.00 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 7,418.71 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 26,682.69 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 28,032.91 05800 LIQUOR FUND 278,940.16 05900 UTILITY FUND 446,261.63 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 921.87 05950 RECYCLING FUND 37,683.00 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 2,510.03 Report Totals 1,165,079.04 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing polipies,and procedures dar, w ce s Asvr fa City Manager 1/12/2011 9:00:25 Page- 1 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 11/27/10-12/27/10 Card Holder Jlerchani Account Name Trans Date Amount Purchase Discription Merchant Name Merchant City State Code JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/11/29 $10.50 ADAPTIVE REC PROGRAM JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/11/29 $10.50 ADAPTIVE REC PROGRAM JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/11/29 $859.97 FURNITURE JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/11/30 $10.50 ADAPTIVE REC PROGRAM JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/12/01 $160.96 ADAPTIVE REC PROGRAM JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/12/03 $79.05 CASH REGISTER PAPER JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/12/07 $100.00 POSTAGE JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/12/09 $20.41 SKATING MEETING JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/12/13 $51.07 SHOVELS JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/12/21 ($63.00) ADAPTIVE REC PROGRAM JOHN KEPRIOS 2010/12/23 $35.61 EQUIPMENT RENTAL JEFF LONG 2010/11/26 $183.74 BACKGROUND INV SCHOOL JEFF LONG 2010/11/30 $18.55 AWARD PLAQUE JEFF LONG 2010/12/01 $77.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL JEFF LONG 2010/12/01 $268.69 ENVELOPES /LABELS JEFF LONG 2010/12/07 $49.55 TOOL SET JEFF LONG 2010112/11 $265.58 POWER SUPPLY JEFF LONG 2010/12/13 $62.55 VIDEO CAPTURE CARD JEFF LONG 2010/12/14 $16.08 WINDOW PUNCH JEFF LONG 2010/12/21 $280.00 POLICE RETIREE'S LUNCHEON JEFF LONG 2010/12/22 $119.00 CONFERENCE JEFF LONG 2010/12/22 $33.18 STORAGE BOXES JEFF LONG 2010/12/23 $168.80 STORAGE BOXES JEFF LONG 2010/12/24 ($81.63) DISCOUNT ON PURCHASE JOHN WALLIN 2010/11/29 $465.00 CONFERENCE - SISTERMAN JOHN WALLIN 2010/11/30 $13.00 COMPUTER DISPLAY ADAPTER JOHN WALLIN 2010/12/09 $1,500.00 MAC TRAINING -BISEK JOHN WALLIN 2010/12/15 $50.00 CERTIFICATE RENEWAL JOHN WALLIN 2010/12/16 $136.27 EXTERNAL HARD DRIVES JOHN WALLIN 2010/12/16 $40.74 EXTERNL HARD DRIVE CASES JOHN WALLIN 2010/12/21 $36.00 ANSI POWER DOOR STANDARD STAGES THEATRE COMPAN HOPKINS MN 1629.6406 STAGES THEATRE COMPAN HOPKINS MN 1629.6404 THIS END UP FURNITURE C 919 - 7747474 NC 5630.6530 STAGES THEATRE COMPAN HOPKINS MN 1629.6406 BRUNSWICK ZONE EDEN Pf EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1629.6406 AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM /BILI WA 5631.6513 PITNEYBOWES- POSTAGE 800 -468 -8454 CT 5621.6235 DAVANNI'S #15 EDINA MN 1622.6406 MILLS FLEET FARM #2500 LAKEVILLE MN 5210.6406 STAGES THEATRE COMPAN HOPKINS MN 1629.6406 PB METER REN *TAL 800 - 228 -1071 CT 5610.6235 RADISSON HOTELS ST. CLOUD MN 1400.6104 OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 1400.6406 FBI NATIONAL ACADEMY A�r- 703 - 6321990 VA 1400.6105 OFFICE MAX EDINA MN 1450.6406 SEARS COM INTERNET 800 -676 -5543 IA 1400.6406 HP SERVICES 800 - 325 -5372 CA 1400.6160 INTERNET WAREHOUSE 216- 503 -6363 OH 1400.6160 CONTAINERSTORE.COM 800- 733 -3532 TX 1400.6406 VESCIOS ITALIAN RESTAU MINNEAPOLIS MN 1400.6106 FRED PRYOR CAREERTRAC MISSION KS 1400.6104 OFFICE DEPOT #1090 800 -463 -3768 MA 1400.6406 OFFICE DEPOT #1105 800 -463 -3768 IL 1400.6406 HP SERVICES 800- 325 -5372 CA 1400.6160 GOVTTRNGSVC 651 - 222 -7409 MN 1554.6104 MONOPRICE COM 909 - 989 -6887 CA 5913.6406 FIRST TECH MINNEAPOLIS MN 2210.6104 INT'L CODE COUNCIL INC 877 - 765 -8669 IL 1495.6103 AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM /BILI WA 2210.6406 AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /BILI WA 2210.6406 ANSI 212 - 6424980 NY 1495.6405 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 11/27/10- 12/27/10 Card Holder Aerchani Account Name Trans Date Amount Purchase Discription Merchant Name Merchant City State Code JOHN WALLIN 2010/12/21 $160.43 COUNCIL WORKSHOP D BRIAN'S DELI -#6 MINNEAPOLIS MN 1100.6106 JOHN WALLIN 2010/12/22 $118.18 HEADPHONES AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /BILI WA 2210.6406 JOHN WALLIN 2010/12/22 $7.84 HEADPHONES SHIPPING AMAZON MKTPLACE PMTS AMZN.COM /BILI WA 2210.6406 $5,264.12 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing ppligies and procedures M-12 -11M /a //v ,1NA. ow Le REPORURECOM MEN ®ATION. To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VII. A. DEBRA MANGEN Action From: CITY CLERK Discussion ® Information Date: JANUARY 18, 2011 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received since the last Council meeting. Susan Howl 1ECE QED . A A N 14 "nil Aayors and Council Members, You are invited to the 101h Annual Road Salt Symposium and extended a special invitation to the Free Special Afternoon Session for City Officials and WMO's, highlighted below. See the attached agenda for further details. Register by phone or email: 952 - 314 -8133 or Jeanne @freshwater.org (for the special session or the full day) Thank you 10th Annual Road Salt Symposium Moving Beyond Chlorides: Keeping Our Winter Roads Safe While Protecting Our Waters -A special session for City Officials, WMO's and others will be held in the afternoon. Please see the attached agenda.— This session is designed to: • help decision- makers understand the impacts road salt has on our environment, • become familiar with MPCA's TMDL process for waterways impaired with chlorides, • provide support to public works departments in decision making and planning • and to help be a part of the solution to protect our waters! Conference fees and entrance fee to the Arboretum are waived for this special session. Registration is required. Register online (for the full day) Register by phone or email: 952 - 314 -8133 or Jeanne @freshwater.org (for the special session or the full day) Cost for the full day (includes continental breakfast and buffet lunch and entrance fee to the Arboretum): o $125 - regular o $85 - seniors and students Please register by January 28, 2011. A refund (minus $25) will be given for cancellations received up to five business days prior to the event. In Minnesota, every year brings an increase in waterways impaired by chlorides from - road salts. Alternative chemical, non - chemical and mechanical solutions exist to help keep the chloride out of our waters. Please join us at the 10th Annual Road Salt Symposium and learn about the latest advances in winter maintenance that will help to ensure the sustainability of our water. The focus of the symposium will be information and discussion of better techniques and alternative products to mitigate the effects of u ` j deicing materials on the environment and our infrastructure. This can be done without F . compromising safety. Date, Location and Registration This symposium is scheduled from 8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. (registration begins at 7:30 a.m.) on February 3, 2011, at the University of Minnesota Landscape Arboretum in Chanhassen, Minnesota. A Trade Show featuring the latest innovations in equipment, chemicals and information begins at 2:45 pm. -A special session for City Officials, WMO's and others will be held in the afternoon. Please see the attached agenda.— This session is designed to: • help decision- makers understand the impacts road salt has on our environment, • become familiar with MPCA's TMDL process for waterways impaired with chlorides, • provide support to public works departments in decision making and planning • and to help be a part of the solution to protect our waters! Conference fees and entrance fee to the Arboretum are waived for this special session. Registration is required. Register online (for the full day) Register by phone or email: 952 - 314 -8133 or Jeanne @freshwater.org (for the special session or the full day) Cost for the full day (includes continental breakfast and buffet lunch and entrance fee to the Arboretum): o $125 - regular o $85 - seniors and students Please register by January 28, 2011. A refund (minus $25) will be given for cancellations received up to five business days prior to the event. Who Should Attend Those interested in discussing the impacts of road salt and other deicers and the search for solutions to reduce these impacts are encouraged to attend this symposium. Topics Covered • Local and regional impacts of chlorides on waters • Latest innovations in snow and ice removal materials and equipment • Taking action through education and policy • Non - chemical alternatives • Environmental Leadership Awards • 10th anniversary special: "Road Salt: Where we've been... where we're going" • Much more - -- including a Trade Show featuring innovative equipment, chemicals and information. Credit • 1.0 Roads Scholar Program elective credit To the best of our knowledge, this course /activity meets the continuing education requirements for 6.0 PDHs as outlined in Minnesota Statute 326.107. More information concerning continuing education for professionals is online at www.aelslagid.state.mn.us. RECEVE6 JAN 13 2011 Ms. -Eva Johnson i 11 _� i USA QXo 1�. OUR VIEW H 'U��THOM MILLER and JAMI L$PRAY Light rail should sure corridor With freighttrains Can it be that freight rail cannot share space with South- west Light Rail through the Kenilworth railroad corri- dor? And over $100 million of taxpayer dollars must be spent to send them instead through St. Louis Park neigh- bors' backyards and just feet from our high school? Safety in . the Park, a neighborhood advocacy or- ganization, along with two independent railroad engi -. neering consultants, strong- ly disagree. Last month Hennepin County ' consultants ad- dressed a joint session of the St. Louis Park City Coun- cil and sc o0 oar too er several engineering solu- lions for co- locating the new Southwest Light Rail near the current freight rail in the Kenilworth' railroad corri- dor, so as to avoid building new infrastructure to run the trains through St.`s Lis ParL The options ranged in omplexity and cost. Many listeners ques- tioned why another op- tion — simply running the light rail alongside the cur- rent freight rail and mov- ing or narrowing the bike trail for one - quarter mile — was not presented. From the consultant's own figures, it seemed that there is more than enough room to make this option a reality. last year. Three days after the. coun- ty's presentation.portrayed co-location as a real possibil- ity, Hennepin County Com- missioner Gail Dorfman an- nounced to the media that a mistake was made in' the study, that the area in ques- tion in the Kenilworth Cor- ridor is apparently, 62 feet wide instead of 82 feet wide, and there may be no. poten- tial for any co- location.. Hennepin County has spent in excess of $240,000 of taxpayer funding on re- route consultants ';to study these important matters, and seemingly no' one both- ered to measure the com- dor accurately. Frankly: 4t t is staggering and/or a`.bit suspicious: At this point, Hennepin County officials :and.` the county's .consultants have little credibility. Many-,peo- ple are skeptical that the "latest measurement," and the resulting conclusion that co- location is not possi- ble, have any basis in fact. . Consulting railroad, engi- neers working with Safety in the Park believe that the cor- ridor is indeed wide enough for freight rail and light rail to co -exist if the nearby bike trail is moved in that short stretch. Furthermore, these consultants have de- termined that to save more space, the light rail trains Such questions are partic- could share one track , ularly apt when considering the short ' distance. with no that the group also has been change to - train schedules. made aware of the elaborate This is a common practice plan for re- routing through around the country in such St. Louis Park a plan that situations and could save the c or miles of new bridges bike trail in the corridor. and new tracks. Safety in the Finally, at last month's Park, in consultation with meeting, Commissioner two separate railroad engi- Dorfman insinuated that y neering consultants, has de- if studies need to continue termined that the freight re- to get this situation right, route through St Louis Park they may delay 'or put an would cost, wi out any mi - . end to SWLRT. Residents igatio�n, approximately $100 of St. Louis Park and sup - million. This is to say noth- porters of Safety in the Park ing of the extreme safe- ' strongly desire light rail in ty risks posed by rerouting our community. Yet, if the .these trains within feet of St. SWLRT is delayed or can- Louis Park High School and celled, it will be the fault of u a e so homes. county officials who lacked act, on Oct. 2, one of the leadership tomake sure the freight trains in- ques- things were done right -the tion derailed on a perfectly first time, flat, perfectly straight por- Furthermore, it seems tion of the current route, that the county. and the Min - The St. Louis Park route is nesota Department ofTrans- full of curves, grade chang= portation are either favo- es and grade -level vehicle/ ing Minneapolis (where th pedestrian crossings. Kenilworth corridor runs) Imagine a derailment for political reasons or there near the high school and /or is a serious case of incom- homes with trains that can petence in both organiza - carry any number of harm- 'tons. Why else would they ful loads, including ethanol. encourage spending an es- The sheer weight of a unit timated $100 million of tax - train carrying a hundred payer funding to build new 286,000 -pound coal cars, railroad tracks and bridges around two blind curves is , when the freight rail can stay . a tragedy waiting to happen ,where it is for a tiny fraction when the train runs 35 feet of that sum? from the high school parking lot — not even the length of Thom Miller and Jam! LaPray are one coal car. And this is in- Safety in the Park colchalLrs. deed a real fear: Accord- . (]jlJ ➢9 ng to the Federal Railroad LA Administration, there were over 1,300 U.S. derailments 'J i/ L r^ Danielle Fagre Arlowe' 4818 Golf Terrace Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Edina City Council Members, JAN 13 241 I understand the Council is likely to forego the opportunity to install sidewalks as part of the;coming Golf Terrace reconstruction project. I am writing today to strongly urge you to reconsider. To put it.bluntly, I fear that the absence of sidewalks puts small children (mine included) at risk, and it would be a shame to miss this chance to increase the safety and value of this neighborhood. Traffic on Golf Terrace Golf Terrace has approximately 633 cars traveling on it daily, which brings it very near the number (750) that triggers the Engineering Department to automatically recommend separating pedestrians from traffic. But this coupled with the fact that Golf Terrace / Lake Harvey have SO much pedestrian traffic should give the Council pause. Our house is on Golf Terrace, directly across from Lake Harvey. From this vantage I am able to observe is the constant pedestrian traffic around the lake and down the street. People of all ages from the neighborhood and beyond, walk, jog and ride bikes down Golf Terrace and around Lake Harvey. People who work in the office building by Perkins walk here over their lunch hour; neighborhood moms walk all morning; school kids and adult groups from the Community center use the street to jog in, the Spring and Summer months during and after school. Given the unusual amount of pedestrian traffic, the chance of a pedestrian injury is significantly higher on Golf Terrace and Lake Harvey than on another street with a similar level of car traffic. So, though we are a bit below the 750 - car automatic trigger we-are close and the high level of pedestrian traffic clearly warrants the Council exercising its discretion to install sidewalks in the name of safety. In fact, our corner at the intersection of Golf Terrace and Lakeview near the frontage road must be at or above the 750 level, because the section of Lakeview near the end of Golf Terrace has 550 cars daily. I understand the traffic studies did not look at this intersection, but it's reasonable to infer that our corner.(where the 633 cars per day from Golf Terrace combine with and the 550 cars pe'r day from Lakeview) must exceed the 750 per car level. My observation is that few cars go straight from Golf Terrace to Lakeview at this point (or vice versa); rather, most cars are either coming from or going to the frontage road. All of this makes a sidewalk, at least around Lake Harvey and to the schools, where pedestrians are most likely to get hit by a car, essential from a safety standpoint. Proximity to Normandale, Concord and Southview schools There are three schools that abut the Golf Terrace Neighborhood Roadway Improvement Area. There is nowhere else in the city of Edina where three different schools are so closely concentrated. Given this, it would be difficult to understand why the Council would miss an opportunity to build sidewalks at least around Lake Harvey and on Sherwood, Dalrymple and St. Andrews. There are sidewalks around the school area, but they abruptly end at the neighborhoods where the kids going to them live. From a safety perspective, this makes no sense. There are sidewalks all through Country Club and down Wooddale, but there is no sidewalk connection to get anyone from Country Club and Wooddale to the concentration of three schools. This is the Council's chance to reverse this absurd situation and connect Wooddale to the concentration of three schools by sidewalk. If the Council is serious about making Edina a walkable city, then excluding sidewalks from the Golf Terrace Neighborhood Roadway Improvement Area is inexcusable. Children in Danger My two children are five and four years old. My oldest daughter goes to school at Normandale, 2.5 blocks away. She will be joined by her sister in the fall of 2012. But I'm worried they will never be able to walk to school, because there is no safe route. The traffic is too fast to cross the frontage road and the route up Lakeview to Sherwood is not safe without a sidewalk, because it's so curvy and blind. I remind the Council that about six months ago, a teenager was traveling North on the Frontage road behind our house and drove through our fence and through our backyard into a tree, a rock wall and our neighbor's fence. The car was just a few feet from our daughters' playset, and had we been home at the time, they could have easily been injured or killed. Of course this was a freak accident, but it's also a dramatic reminder of how dangerous it would be for my daughters (and, of course, the other children from our street.) to cross the frontage road (twice!) in order to walk to school. Edina could offset the cost of sidewalks near schools by no longer bussing children who live within a couple of blocks of the school. My friends who live on Sherwood Avenue, almost literally a stone's throw from the school their children attend are offered bus service by the City of Edina. My oldest child takes the bus, as will my youngest when she starts school. The children who live on Golf Terrace and the neighborhood approaching the three school area are easily able to walk the distance to school, but almost none of them do because it's not safe. It would be a step towards promoting healthy lifestyles for our children to encourage walking. It would also be better for the environment to have fewer school busses. Assign Appropriate Weight to Survey Results Finally, I understand the majority of respondents in a survey were opposed to the sidewalk plan as presented. The survey is only a snapshot of current residents' opinions and reflects the current demographics of the street. I believe the opponents of the plan responded negatively out of financial self interest; it's not surprising that families with teen children, empty- nesters, and retirees would respond in the negative in hopes of avoiding an incremental increase in the assessment, not to mention added disruption to their landscaping (albeit on the city -owned portion of their landscaping). But in five or ten years, many of these residents will have moved away, possibly to be replaced with newlyweds and young families. If sidewalks are built now, the neighborhood will be that much more attractive to such potential residents. Granted, as a mother of young children, my support for sidewalks is in my self interest. But in the end I believe my children's safety and public safety in general should trump economic -self interest of the negative responders to the survey. Keeping in mind that the first several feet of our property is city property, not private property, the City should do all that it can to promote pedestrian safety, particularly child safety, and neighborhood walkability. In conclusion, I respectfully urge the Council to include sidewalks as part of the Golf Terrace Neighborhood Roadway Improvement Plan. Doing so will substantially increase the beauty, usability, and most important, the safety of our neighborhood. Thank you. Sincerely, Danielle Fagre Arlowe RECEWED JAN 13 2011 Ago, 4 /la w v rdy - Z d� G►pw Q iVi mart you cl ji) r A Gin apt � n / COL4 ic/ do e� v k� -b c h o t y rn y ^1 ' 41/ y ate YO" �n y G�in��/ y 6"- arc. J yp not Thank you ht ro fr c' C1. �Z . /7161 h-�- �D �r GCv bl) kYA f S/vrl ago aC4V y0 1. will ire- /A y 7-77vt4 Jch ts- �� Q' pry cl e'"c yam, 0 RECEOVED JAN 1 D!�' Dear Mr. Winkel, Dec I rceoPoy On November 6th you responded to an emergency at Utley park in Edina. My 22 year old nephew, Tyler, had experienced a sudden cardiac arrest. At the time of my call, Tyler was unresponsive and his situation was dire. You were part of an amazing effort that was absolutely key to saving Tyler's life. I want you to know that Tyler, all of his family and friends as well as myself, will be forever grateful. In the weeks since that crisis. we have learned that what happened is rare, especially in someone like Tyler who is young and exceptionally healthy. We have also learned that many individuals do not survive cardiac arrest and, for those who do, the recovery process can be long and complicated. Tyler was hospitalized. for 14 days and he is now completing physical rehab on an out - patient basis. His recovery has been remarkable; many of his care providers have used the word "miraculous" to describe it. Tyler is looking forward to returning to his pre - health crisis activities. This includes studying for his doctorate in the Department of Material Sciences at the University of Minnesota and spending time with the many people in his life. While Tyler's doctors can't explain why he suffered a cardiac arrest, they have been able to take important steps to prevent future incidents. Your efforts on November 6th saved the life of an exceptional person. Tyler is a wonderful combination of intellect, compassion, pragmatism., and humor. He is my brother's only son and a treasure to our entire family. I can't imagine what our lives would be without him. Your intervention impacted not only Tyler, but the lives -of his many, many friends and family members. I don't have the words to express my sincere gratitude. Thank you. You will always be in my thoughts and heart. JAN 13 2'1 V� Dec Cb GP0 Lj --------------- ��_ „ 4 Dear Mr. Quinn, On November 6th you responded to an emergency at Utley park in Edina. My 22 year old nephew, Tyler, had experienced a sudden cardiac arrest. At the time of my call,.Tyler was unresponsive and his situation was dire. You were part of an amazing effort that was absolutely key to saving Tyler's life. I want you to know that Tyler, all of his family and friends as well as myself, will be forever grateful. In the weeks since that crisis we have learned that what happened is rare, especially in someone like Tyler who is young and exceptionally healthy. We have also learned that many individuals do not survive cardiac arrest and, for those who do, the recovery process can be long and complicated. Tyler was hospitalized for 14 days and he is now completing physical rehab on an out - patient basis. His recovery has been. remarkable; many of his care providers have used the word "miraculous" to describe it. Tyler is looking forward to returning to his pre - health crisis activities. This includes studying for his doctorate in the Department of Material Sciences at the University of Minnesota and spending time with the many people in his life. While 71�ler's doctors can't explain why he suffered a cardiac arrest, they have been able to take important steps to prevent future incidents. Your efforts on November 6th saved the life of an exceptional person. Tyler is a wonderful combination of intellect, compassion, pragmatism, and humor. He is my brother's only son and a treasure to our entire family. I can't imagine what our lives would be without him. Your intervention impacted not only Tyler, but the lives of his many, many friends and family members. I don't have the words to express my sincere gratitude. Thank you. You will always be in my thoughts and heart. Susan Howl From: H Havir [mailto:hhavir @nbs- inc.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 11:46 AM To: Lynette Biunno�' ;' Subject: Development Issues - Colonial Church /Shelter Corp. RE `I. To: Edina Mayor and City Council From: Harvey and Mary Havir 6108 Tracy Avenue Re: Tax Increment Financing Colonial Church /Shelter Corp. Date: January 12,.2011 According to information from the Minnesota House of Representatives, tax increment financing (TIF) was initiated as a tool to help with urban renewal (redeveloping "slums" and "blighted" areas). That does not seem to fit very well with the situation we are looking at in the Countryside neighborhood. Here it seems we are being asked to involve the City of Edina with assisting to ensure and increase the profitability of a venture by a highly successful developer. This is far outside of the intent of the law! That is the primary reason to deny this request. A TIF is is also designed to stimulate the property values of the surrounding community. The problem here is that the vast majority of the homeowners in the community feel that this project, as now proposed, will have exactly the opposite effect. It is now the consensus of the community that property values will be be decreased if this Commercial venture were to be dropped into an area totally surrounded by R -1 zoned properties. This is highly likely to decrease property values. Our research has located adjacent other commercial a boundary. What modification of that the request Thank you. also found that where st to R -1 properties they properties. That amounts the Shelter Corporation a commercial boundary, an should be denied. ructures of this nature are are ALSO located adjacent to to, at worst, a modification of is proposing is NOT a d is therefore a third reason Susan Howl From: Kent Gravelle [ mailto :kentgravelle @gravellelaw.com] [ CE QV[ Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 12:21 PM To: Lynette Biunno JAN 12 2.0111 Subject: TIF for Shelter Corp. /Colonial Church project Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council, I know the formal vote is some time away, but it is my hope that the City of Edina will not approve TIF (Tax Increment Financing) for the Shelter Corporation- Living Waters project on the property between Colonial Church and the fire station. I have done some research recently on the history of TIF approvals in the City of Edina. I can find no example of TIF money being approved for projects slated to be built on green space. All previous TIF approvals in the City of Edina which I could find always involved the demolition of old structures (sometimes hazardous) to be replaced by new structures usually of use to the public as a whole. Examples included 50th & France, Grandview (which replaced a gas station with its old underground tanks), etc. I can understand that there can be a difference of opinion on last summer's approval of the Living Waters project but I, and many others, will have greater difficulty understanding why the City of Edina must also approve TIF money for a project that much or even most of the residents of the city oppose. Sincerely, Kent Gravelle 5609 Tracy Ave. Edina, MN 55436 Susan Howl From: mellum.julie @gmail.com [mailto:mellum julie @gmail.com] ���� Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 20112:24 PM _ To: Lynette Biunno Subject: thank you Lynette, Would you please forward this to the City Council members and Mayor who attended my interview last evening for membership in the Edina Community Health Committee? There was a gentleman there whose name I don't remember who may have been..on the Park Board, but was not a city council member. , Do you:know who he was? The meeting was in the first office in the front door. If you can let me know, I will forward him the thank 'you note separately. Thank you! Julie January 12; 2011. Dear Mayor.Hovland and City Council Members, Thank you once again for your time participating in my interview for membership in the Edina Community Health Committee last evening. Please know that in addition. to my strong interest in air quality; issues and children's health, I am also excited about the Healthy Lifestyles Initiative that Edina, Bloomington and Richfield will be involved in as well as the Green Step Cities program.. I would love working on Edina's. developing more bike and walking paths! If appointed, I would welcome the opportunity to work on any and all issues that the Health Committee and City Council deem important. Sincerely, Julie Mellum 5700 York AVenue S. Edina, MN 55410 952 - 303 -6218 1 Susan Howl RRECE WE DD JAN 12 2.31 From: Susan [mailto:spetersen4 @comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 20115:24 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Tiff Money I have sent several emails concerning different agenda's that Edina is looking into. I think it is ridiculous that the City of Edina is even looking into giving the Colonial Church /Shelter Corporation a chance to address receiving Tiff money for there project. As you can see below on these links that this supports the citizens of Edina rights as to where are taxpayer money goes. I have never heard of a project wanting the taxpayers to support a corporation's project. They must not have the money to support this project. I live near the park and I dont want a commercial building in my neighb The TIF Act is found at Minn. Stat. §§ 469.174 to 469.1799 https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=469 http: / /www.house.leg. state .mn.us /hrd /issinfo /tifinech.htm https: / /www.revisor.mn.gov /bin /getpub.php ?pubtype =STAT CHAP &year= current &chapter= 469 #stat.469.201 .0 or and at the expense of my taxpayor money. signed a taxpayor of edina Susan Susan Howl RECEI IL.- I_) JAPE 12 2u ?1 From: Doug Barber [mailto:barberd @divtechusa.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 20115:54 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Another Walgreens & TIF Money for Colonial Sr. Center... No way! Please City Council Reconsider ITEM 1: My Family has been going to Olson Brothers for over 40 years. We lost Clancy's We don't need another Walgreens - this is awful if you allow this. We have one on Interlachen We have one on 50th We have one near Southdale. There are pharmacy's in Lunds, Byerlys, Target - no more WALGREENS please Please stop this madness driving the small business owners out with the crush of insensitive personnel, low budget, Small grocery competing with Jerry's. ITEM 2 So you guys are considering to allow TIF money and let the Tax payers subsidize the Colonial SR Living- center? That wasn't on the agenda when they were trying get the approval to build there. NO WAY - Please reconsider. Respectfully Doug & Patti Barber 5824 Jeff Place Edina, MN 55436 H: (952) 925 -3181 C: (612) 816 -1046 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno n° I i �, J i Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 12:45 PM u �, To: Scott Neal Cc: Susan Howl JAN 1 4 241 Subject: FW: TIF Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and City Manager Scott Neal. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(fti.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com _`7 ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: burton shacter [mailto:bbshacter @comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 11:44 AM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: Barbara Hoganson Subject: TIF There is discussion around that the Shelter project may be seeking TIF for the assisted living project on Colonial Way. The project as approved by the Council last year will have enough negative impacts on the Community without putting further financial burden on Edina's Citizens. I oppose any use of TIF for this project as should Edina City Council ECEI I From: Emily Boettge [mailto:dboettge @comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 12:09 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: W 70th St. in Edina per 70th & Cornelia Dr. Dear Edina City Council, I am writing because I am concerned about pedestrian safety in Edina; particularly with regard to the Cornelia neighborhood, Cornelia School and especially the intersection of W. 70 St. and Cornelia Dr. I think the general safety of pedestrians in the Cornelia neighborhood, where I live, is much lower than it should be. Due to lack of sidewalks, snowy winters and a general lack of safety consciousness on the part of motorists in the neighborhood, walking and biking can be a very stressful, dangerous activity. I, believe this is especially true for children in the neighborhood. We have a great neighborhood school, walking to and from school is an extremely healthy means of travel, but crossing 70th St. is probably the most dangerous thing that kids north of 70th St. face in their young lives. First, I would like to ask that we focus community dollars toward an education campaign that would raise the consciousness of pedestrian safety among motorists. After watching motorists drive right between student - crossing guards with their STOP flags out (at the intersection of 70th and Cornelia Dr.), I can only conclude that drivers in Edina don't know or understand that pedestrians have the right of way in a crosswalk. Therefore a campaign to increase the awareness of area motorists with respect to transportation and especially pedestrian right of way could help change the paradigm of dangerous driving that seems to be the model in Edina, especially along 70th St. Second, I would like to ask that, with regard to the redesign of 701h St., special attention is paid to the intersection of 701h and Cornelia Dr. where children need to cross twice a day to get to,school. Furthermore, Cornelia School has plans for. a new playground that could be a fun, safe place for children and families to gather on weekends and in the summer as well. Therefore, I believe that that the intersection of 70th and Cornelia Dr. in particular needs to be re- engineered with the pedestrian in mind. I think that visual cues like signs, lights, bigger, better more obvious crosswalks would help alert motorists to the plight of pedestrians trying to cross the street. I think one of the•most dangerous maneuvers motorists do at that intersection is the left turn into the westbound lane of 70th from the northbound lane of Cornelia Dr. Drivers are panicky that they will miss their left turn and traffic_is heavy during the hours that children are walking to school from increased traffic due to'rush hour and parents dropping their children off from school. This dangerous left turn right into the crosswalk really needs to be addressed when redesigning 70th St. All in all, I really look forward to the redesign of 70th St and I hope that we can focus community dollars toward both a campaign to raise awarenessbf pedestrian safety (especially right of way) as, well as addressing the particular needs of pedestrian safety at 70,n & Cornelia drive with visual cues and street engineering with pedestrian safety as the main concern. . Thank you, Emily Boettge Susan Howl Subject: FK More Money for Kimley Horn From: FranzSr @aol.com [mailto:FranzSr @aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 20116:35 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Fwd: More Money for Kimley Horn RD ECEIVi JAN 12 21'1 Edina City Council; Uninformed residents of Edina would like to know how this might affect us. Will you discuss this on January 18? We look forward to any response. Joanie Burris 5832 Olinger Blvd., From: chickadeedee55 @gmail.com To: FranzSr @aol.com Sent: 1/11/2011 7:38:44 A.M. Central Standard Time Subj: Fwd: More Money for Kimley Horn --- - - - - -- Forwarded message ---- - - - - -- From: Safety In the Park <safetyinthepark(cilgmail.com> Date: Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 9:21 PM Subject: More Money for Kimley Horn To: H i, We've just learned that Hennepin County has spent yet another $25,000 in taxpayer funding for the independent consultant studying the MN &S re -route alternative. More wasted taxpayer dollars being spent on a company that, thus far, has done little other than act as a PR agency for Hennepin County and MNDOT. Your tax dollars hard at work to create an unsafe railroad highway through the middle of St. Louis Park, Edina, and other communities that will last for generations to come. Here is the link so you can read for yourself. http:/ /board co hennepin mn us /sirepub/ cache / 246/ zgybom45ohrlgfgclgcrbly3 /13247601092011010227918.PDF 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 8:19 AM To: Scott Neal Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Shelter Corp TIF This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Scott Neal. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunnoraci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com For Livia Y Learnin >, Raising Families & Doing Business b� 6 6 From: Tim Robb [mailto:tgrobb @yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 20118:03 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Shelter Corp TIF To:Edina City Leaders 12 24Y.1 Why, in this economy, are we as a city considering giving money out to a private Corp to build a for profit business ? ? ? ?? Come on, let's turn this boat around! Tim Robb Edina resident RE Stephen Winnick JAN 13 2:1 I Thursday Jan. 13, 2011 Mayor and Council Members: I am most appreciative for the time and attention from all of you in the thoughtful interview you gave me Tuesday night. Edina is a special place to live as exemplified by the service and character of its leaders. I would be honored to serve as an advisor in the Human Rights area during yet another critical time in our history. Thank you for your consideration. Steve Winnick 7117 Lanham Lane winsteve @comcast.net o0D, �nTA8bIS DEFINING EXCELLENCE January 5, 2011 Mayor Jim Hovland Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland: RECEIVED JAN 0 S 2011 -------------- ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 5701 Normandale Road Edina, MN 55424 (952) 848 -3900 www.edina.k12.mn.us Edina Public Schools continues to appreciate the wonderful partnership and collaborative efforts we enjoy with the City of Edina. Typifying this partnership was the response by the Edina Police and Fire Departments to a chemical spill at Edina High School on October 15. At the November 8 School Board meeting, the Board publicly recognized the Edina Police and Fire Departments with commendations. Please find enclosed this recognition. I had hoped to personally present this to you and the council at a November or December meeting, but scheduling conflicts did not allow this to occur. Again, I wish to thank all of the City of Edina personnel for the many ways they enhance learning in our school district. We look forward to working with you in 2011 and beyond. Warm regards, c NAOrgs, Prtnrshps, Govt \City of Edina \Hovland TY.doc WE CARE ♦ WE DARE V WE SHARE FOR ACTION INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 273 Regular Meeting, November 8, 2010 SUBJECT: COMMENDATION OF EDINA POLICE AND FIRE DEPARTMENTS Be it Resolved, That The -Board of Education Commend and recognize the Edina Police and Fire Departments for their service to the Edina School District. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The Board hereby expresses its sincere appreciation for the responsiveness and shared expertise of the Edina Police Department and the Edina Fire Department with the chemical spill at Edina High School on October 15, 2010. The efforts of the departments assisted in securing the site, ensuring the safety of students and staff, and guiding the necessary clean -up. }l, r 4,91N�1j� W • r��'ORPORf''i�� ieee REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VII. A. -2 Action DEBRA MANGEN From: CITY CLERK Discussion ® Information Date: JANUARY 18, 2011 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED AFTER PACKETS INFORMATION/BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received after the packets were delivered to you. MIKE OPAT 612- 348 -7881 CHAIR ��xro cn FAX 612 - 348 -8701 �� ; r „�; t, in.mn.us mike.o at @co.henne P P T BOARD OF HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMISSIONERS A -2400 GOVERNMENT CENTER MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA 55487 -0240 The Honorable James Hovland Mayor of Edina 4$01 Y�VeJt 5V1h Street Edina, MN 55424 or Dear May oviand: �M January 12, 2011 E C E � V EDC JAN 18 20 111 ---------- - - - - -I On behalf of the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners, I would like to express our sincere gratitude for the significant contribution made by your staff Deb Mangen and Jane Timm during the recent Gubernatorial Recount. Due to the logistical challenges of hand counting over 470,000 ballots within a short window of time; Hennepin County requested your staff's assistance in organizing and conducting this recount. Your staff's support was a critical factor in the success of our recount effort. On Tuesday, January 25th, the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners will be formally commending Deb Mangen and Jane Timm along with eleven other local election officials for their assistance with Hennepin County's recount efforts. cc: Scott Neal Deb Mangen Jane Timm Sincerely, Mike i at, C Hennepin ounty Board of Commissioners PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER Susan Howl ' RECEME _... ..... ._ ..... - _.. Subject: Opposed to TIF for the Shelter Corporation- Living Waters JAN 18 2011 ----------------- To Edina City Council Members: Please note that we are strongly opposed to any TIF being granted for the Colonial Church /Shelter Corp 1. Recent research on the history of TIF approvals in the City of Edina finds no examples of TIF money being approved for projects slated to be built on green space. All previous TIF approvals in the City of Edina appear to have involved the demolition of old structures to be replaced by new structures - usually of use to the public as a whole. 2. Residents will have difficulty understanding why the City of Edina would consider TIF money for a project strongly opposed by many of the residents most greatly impacted. Asking residents to help pay for such a project adds insult to injury. 3. According to information from the Minnesota House of Representatives, http• /hvNhtiv house Ie�� state mn .us/hrd /i.sshifo /tifinech.h.tm, tax increment financing was initiated as a tool to help with urban renewal (redeveloping "slums" and "blighted" areas). That does not seem to fit very well with the situation we are looking at in the Countryside neighborhood. Herr it seems we are being asked to involve the City of Edina with assisting to ensure and increast the profitability of a venture by a highly successful developer. This is far outside of the intent of the law! That is the primary reason to deny this request. 4. TIF is also designed to stimulate the property values of the surrounding community. The problem here is that the vast majority of the homeowners in the community feel that this project, as now proposed, will have exactly the opposite effect. It is now the consensus of the community that property values will be decreased if this Commercial venture were to be dropped into an area totally surrounded by R -1 zoned properties. This is highly likely to decrease property values. 5. Research has also found that where structures of this nature are located adjacent to R -1 properties they are also located adjacent to other commercial properties. That amounts to, at worst, a modification of a boundary. What the Shelter Corporation is proposing is not a modification of a commercial boundary, and is therefore a third reason that the request should be denied. Thank you, Phil Bohrer and Jean McDowall REC�EW Susan Howl Importance: High I - - - - -- I To the Mayor and Council: I want to voice my opinion against the request by Colonial Church to receive a subsidy from the taxpayers of Edina for their upscale commercial apartment building. This project, which Colonial and Shelter Corporation promoted as the best thing that ever happened to Edina, just seems to be the "gift" that keeps on giving. Or rather, the project that keeps on taking. If it is, in fact, such a much - needed and beneficial project, then it should be able to stand on its own two feet financially. The market will reward it. If not, then it is a whole new ball game and the project's viability needs to be revisited. In their euphoria of gaining approval from the Council, the developers said they would go ahead with the project with, or without, a subsidy. Then hold them to that. If, on the other hand, it appears that the project is not viable without a subsidy — something the neighborhood expressed concern about — then they should not try to meet the needs of a relative few on the backs of the already stressed Edina taxpayers. A TIF subsidy should be for the benefit of the entire city of Edina, not a developer attempting to make money off of the public and a Church that wants to save itself financially at the expense of others. The church already has enough of a subsidy by taking up land that could be paying needed taxes to iur city. It has received services for more than 30 years without paying one dime. Now they want to build a for - profit project with a subsidy for their own benefit. Look at the guidelines for such a subsidy. I don't feel they qualify. Somebody needs to hold these people to standards. No TIF subsidy. No waiver of the Park Dedication Fee "because it is unlikely that our residents will avail themselves of Edina's parks." Most of us don't use the parks, but we pay the taxes to support them, as well as all the other services of the city that we don't use. The rules have changed for them now — no more handouts for a non - profit for their for - profit project. Colonial Church has said they are a "good neighbor." Well ... good neighbors don't take advantage of their city for their own benefit. Tell them to "buck it up" and act like a responsible adult member of the community and start paying their own way! Sincerely, John Harden 5829 Jeff Place Susan Howl .......... ... ................ . ,. .. ., .. From: Sue Keator [ mailto :chickadeedee55 @gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 20118:08 AM To: Kaylin Martin Subject: Shelter Corp project in Countryside Dear Members of the Council: Y ECEO Y fib .lFr/ .. _..... JAN 13 2011 I am writing to object to the request of Shelter Corp. to receive TIF financing for the upcoming project in the Coutryside neighborhood. I have spent roughly 30 years in the investment business with many of those years focusing on municipal bonds. It has been my understanding that TIF financing is generally used to rebuild and improve blighted areas. TIF financing can also be used to help get a deal "done" that would not otherwise be "doable" due to finances. I do not see how the Shelter Corp. project fits either of these qualifications. On the other hand, the area where the Library now sits is a perfect example of a TIF project - the area was blighted and in need of improvement. I just wanted to share my thoughts on this issue as I will be unable to attend this evening's Council meeting due to a professional engagement. I do look forward, however, to the upcoming move of Jerry's Hardware and hope that project gets the needed approvals. Yours, Susan Keator 5041 Yvonne Terrace Edina 55436 Siman Howl From: LWV Edina [Imedina @gmail.com] nt: Monday, January 17, 2011 5:47 PM Lonni Skrentner Suh]ect: LWVE: Action Alert EC EOVI�D j JAN 18 2011 Minnesota's supply of fresh water will be the subject of discussion on Jan. 22 when Deborah Swackhamer, an environmental chemist and professor of environmental health sciences at the University of Minnesota, outlines proposals that will go to the state Legislature during its upcoming session. The state's: Clean Water, Land and Legacy Act funded the development of a "Minnesota Water Sustainability Framework," a set of recommendations to be presented :to the Legislature this month. Swackhamer will discuss the ,recommendations during a meeting of the League of Women Voters of Minnetonka, Eden Prairie and Hopkins. The session is scheduled for 10 -11:30 a.m. Jan. 22 at Minnetonka. City Hall's council chambers, 14600 Minnetonka Blvd. A coffee will begin at 9:30 a.m. The meeting will be open to the public and refreshments will be served. Lonni Skrentner Action Chair LWVE The League of Women Voters of Edina is a non - partisan political organization that encourages the informed and active participation in government, and influences public policy through education and advocacy. For more information, please visit www.lwvedina.org. 1 Susan Howl Please deliver this message to the Edina City Council for the 5:00 PM work session today. To: Mayor James Hovland; Council Members: Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague and Ann Swenson. 1. We Understand the formal vote is some time away, but it is our hope that the City of Edina will not approve TIF (Tax Increment Financing) for the Shelter Corporation- Living Waters project on the property between Colonial Church and the fire station. 2. Some research has recently been done on the history of TIF approvals in the City of Edina. We can't find any examples of TIF money being approved for projects slated to be built on green space. All previous TIF approvals in the City of Edina appear to be always involved with the demolition of old structures (sometimes hazardous) to be replaced by new structures usually of use to the public as a whole. Examples included 50th & France , Grandview (which replaced a gas station with its old underground tanks), etc. 3. We can understand that there can be a difference of opinions on last summer's approval of the Living Waters project but many residents, will have greater difficulty understanding why the City of Edina must also approve TIF money for a project that much or even most of the residents most greatly impacted by this large complex, oppose. And now potentially will be asked also to pay for through tax payers subsidies. Our property taxes have already been increased this year even though property values were reduced. 4. According to information from the Minnesota House of Representatives, htt ,.house:le�.st�lte,nm _us /hrd /issi;nfo /tifinecli..litin, tax increment financing (TIF) was initiated as a tool to help with urban renewal (redeveloping "slums" and "blighted" areas). That does not seem to fit very well with the situation we are looking at in the Countryside neighborhood. Here it seems we are being asked to involve the City of Edina with assisting to ensure and increase the profitability of a venture by a highly successful developer. Th is far outside of the intent of the law! That is the primary reason to deny this request. 5. A TIF is also designed to stimulate the property values of the surrounding community. The problem here is that the vast majority of the homeowners in the community feel that this project, as now proposed, will have exactly the opposite effect. It is now the consensus of the community that property values will be decreased if this Commercial venture were to be dropped into an area totally surrounded by R -1 zoned properties. This is highly likely to decrease property values. 6. Our research has also found that where structures of this nature are located adjacent to R -1 properties they are ALSO located adjacent to other commercial properties. That amounts to, at worst, a modification of a boundary. What the Shelter Corporation is proposing is NOT a modification of a commercial boundary, and is therefore another reason that the request should be denied. The City of Edina has already paved the way for the Colonial Church and The Shelter Group to develop this senior apartment complex in the Countryside neighborhood by allowing them to subdivide the church property and changing the comprehensive plan. We believe that the population this project will serve is not low income individuals, but will be made up of the higher income individuals and families of Edina and members of Colonial Church. This was made clear in comments from proponents for the apartment building during council meetings. This also does not meet the TIF requirements that requires 20% or more of the residential units in the project are occupied by individuals whose income is 50% or less of the area median gross income. Please consider all of the above and disapprove TIF (Tax Increment Financing) for the Shelter Corporation- Living Waters project on the property between Colonial Church and the fire station. Thank you, William Rodgers 6100 Arbour Lane Edina, MN 55436 RECEIVE JAN 18 2 0111 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Braemar R EC E I V I" JAN 18 2011 From: mgregorypeacock @aol.com [mailto:mgregorypeacock @ aol.com] Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 10:12 AM To: mbrindle @comcast.net Subject: Braemar Mary, I have been hearing a lot of talk amongst my friends about Braemar Golf Course lately. I just want to let you know that I golf there on a regular basis and consider it my home course. I also want to mention we rarely stay around afterward due to the condition of the club house, food selection, and overall atmosphere. I personally feel it is a tremendous idea to get a third party involved to get some fresh ideas for improvements and profitability. I am also wondering if the proposed sidewalk will extend to the golf course? I just think it would be so nice if Nikki and I could walk to the course along with the kids for golf and /or something to eat. To be honest, we currently do not walk there due to safely reasons, the condition of the club house, and lack of food choices that is not fried. If you would like to discuss personally, please let me know as I would be happy to. Would you please also pass along my input to the other members of the City Council? Thanks Greg Peacock (and family) 904 Paiute Circle _diva MN 55439 Susan Howl f�fEC[E�va'E: > - - - -- Original Message - - - -- JAN i I } ^ vu _ > From: Toni Cady [mailto:tonicady @yahoo.com] > Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 1:41 PM > To: Kaylin Martin > Subject: Golf at Braemar > I have played golf at Braemar for the past 15 years or so and am > concerned with the revenue losses that seem to have no end in sight. > Perhaps there is a need for an impartial assessment to be made by an > outside expert in this field, because previous actions taken to > alleviate this problem have obviously not been effective. > I realize that many golf courses across the nation are having similar > problems due, largely, to a troubled economy. It would, therefor, be > very prudent for Edina to make use of all available resources, > internal and external, to ensure the future of Braemar Golf course. > And while we all may wish that things remain the same, sometimes that > is impossible . > Yours truly, > Toni M. Cady > 6428 Timber Ridge > Edina 55439 1 Susan Howl ubject: Update for Mayor Hovland Susan, please forward this note to Mayor Hovland and members of the City Council. Also, please copy members of the EH +RRC. Thank you. As I near completion of my second year on the EH +RRC and a year as Chair of the Commission, I wanted to provide an update on some activities which may not be so apparent in the Commission minutes. First, our effort to be visible and accessible to the community continues with a short slide presentation that enables any member of the Commission to share consistent information with community audiences. I made the first presentation to the +Edina Resource Center Board on January 18, 2011. The presentation is simple and takes only about 15 - 20 minutes. And it is intended to inform, engage and listen. I have attached a copy of the slides for your information. We will be connecting with community stakeholders (neighborhood groups, service clubs, +Chamber of +Commerce, etc.) to offer this presentation. Second, at the annual MN Human Rights Day Conference on December 3, 2010, the League of MN Human +Rights Commissions held it's annual meeting. I volunteered for and was elected as a member of the board of directors for 2011. I have also placed my name as a candidate for President of the board at the annual election in February, 2011. I have attached a copy of the letter and resume I submitted for that position. -hird, our Commission has chosen to support an anti - bullying event to be organized for late spring, 2011 in collaboration with several other community partners, primarily in the +Edina +schools. We continue to be appreciative for the support that you and the Council provide. And we are so grateful for all that Susan Howl provides for our Commission. It makes our work possible. Please call on us if there are any questions or issues we can address. Arnie Bigbee Chair of the Edina Human Rights & Relations Commission Beth Burroughs Brown County Family Services 1117 Center Street PO Box 788 New Ulm, MN 56073 Tuesday, January 18, 2011 Beth, As Chair of the Nominations Committee for the League of MN Human Rights Commissions, you deserve a "thank you' for your work on behalf of human rights in Minnesota. I am interested in participating in leadership for the League in 2011 and would like to be considered for the position of President. My commitment is to be of service. Growing up in a single parent home in Minneapolis, we lived in public housing during my teen years. A $300 scholar- ship enabled me to attend my freshman year at the U of M. In 2005 1 married Barbara La Valleur and in 2007 I retired and relocated back to the Twin Cities. My 32 years working at Mayo Clinic in Rochester prepared me to serve my communities and I will continue to serve. I currently chair the Edina HRRC. In addition, I am a member of Outfront MN, Southern Poverty Law Center, NAACP and other organizations. I also chair the board of directors of Pangea World Theater (www .pan geaworldtheater.or . ), located in Minneapolis, as well as chairing the DFL party precinct where I live. I currently am an Independent Repre- sentative for Pre -Paid Legal Services, Inc. and a member of the Ambassadors for the Bloomington Chamber of Com- merce. For me it is essential to interrupt the ordinary assumptions that contribute to each of us becoming complacent and ac- cepting of things as they are. I am interested in discovering a way to navigate a course for change after listening to and respecting the many opinions of those at the table - - -as well as the opinions, needs and rights of those who count on us to represent them. The result is a community embracing needed transformation. Attached is my resume. Please call me if 1 can provide further information. Sincerely, Arnie Bigbee Arnold Bigbee 7621 Edinborough Way, #2110, Edina, MN 55435 C: 507 - 250 -5678 H: 952 - 831 -3508; E: arnieWcD- me.com Employment: 2007 - present: Independent Sales Representative, Pre -Paid Legal Services, Inc 1975 - 2007: Administrator, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN 1973 - 1974: HR Administration, Honeywell Inc, Minneapolis MN 1968 - 1972: HR Administration, NW Computer Services Inc, Minneapolis MN 1965 - 1968: Classroom Teacher, Red Wing Public Schools, Red Wing MN Extensive experience in Management . Information Systems Human Resources Continuous Improvement Leadership /Professional /Community Activities: Member, American Society for Training and Development Society for Academic Continuing Medical Education, Board Member, Treasurer American Red Cross, SE MN Chapter, Board Member /Chair, State Conference Chair, fall 2001 United Way of Olmsted County, Board Member, Campaign Chair Rochester Area Chamber of Commerce, Board Member Intercultural Mutual Assistance Association, Board Member /Chair University Center Rochester Advisory Council, Member /Chair Bethel Lutheran Church, Congregation President, Chair of Long Range Planning Team, Capital Fund Chair, Drama Team Member, Mexico Mission Team Member U of M School of Nursing Foundation, Board Member /Chair U of M Alumni Association, SE Minnesota Chapter, Board Member /Chair U of M All University Honors Committee, Member U of M Rochester Provost Search Committee, Member U of M Rochester Advisory Committee (Regent appointed), Member U of M GLBTA Office, Advocate Pangea World Theater, Minneapolis, Board Member /Chair Precinct 18 DFL in SD 41, Caucus Chair Member Bloomington, Minneapolis Regional and NE Mpis Chambers of Commerce - Ambassador for the Bloomington Chamber Edina Human Rights and Relations Commission, Member /Chair Education • U of MN, 1965 BS • U of MN, 1966 -74, graduate studies • Landmark Education, 2002 - present, Team Management and Leadership Education Susan Howl ......... From: Sara Anderson [mailto:sbmoorel7 @yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, January 17, 2011 11:15 AM To: Kaylin Martin Subject: Edina PCN National Speakers Forum - February 7th Dear City Council Members, JAN 18 2011 On behalf of the Edina Parent Communication Network, I invite you to attend this year's PCN National Speaker Forum at EPAC on Monday, February 7th. PCN is pleased to host award- winning educator and author Dr. Michele Borba presenting an evening address entitled Raising Socially Responsible Kids Who Do the Right Thing. At the afternoon Educators Forum, Dr. Borba will speak about Building Moral Intelligence: Integrating Character into Content. Since 1998, the volunteer -run Edina PCN has offered six educational forums each year to support parents and educators of K -12 children in building stronger families and community. All forums are presented free of charge with the exception of February's National Speaker Forum. As part of the National Speaker event, PCN hosts an afternoon reception and session for District and OLG educators to thank them for all they do for Edina students. Evening forum ticket sales underwrite this service. This year, Dr. Michele Borba will teach caregivers to "Parent for Character." Drawing on her award - winning work, Building Moral Intelligence, Borba will share practical, proven strategies that help children develop responsibility, empathy, conscience and self - control. For the Educators Forum, Dr. Borba will present field- tested ideas for helping students cultivate compassion, respect and accountability. In addition to writing twenty- three parenting books, Michele Borba is a highly regarded consultant to schools throughout the U.S. and abroad. Her proposal "Ending School Violence and Student Bullying" was signed into California law in 2002. She also regularly addresses current parenting challenges on NBC's Today Show and appears on Dateline NBC, CNN Headline News and more. PCN is just one of the many assets that make Edina such an exceptional place. We are excited to have the opportunity to bring Dr. Borba's work to our community. We appreciate your consideration in supporting our organization through your attendance at this event. For your reference, I've attached the posters we're using to publicize this event in our schools. Please visit our website at www.edinapcn.com to learn more about PCN's mission as well as find more information and tickets for this year's National Speaker Forum. Sincerely, Kelli von Heydekampf PCN President EDINA PUBLIC ART COMMITTEE MINUTES - NOVEMBER 10, 2010 Community Room, Edina City Hall 4:OOp.m. PRESENT: Bernice Amacher, Brad Benn, Rick Fesler, Naomi Griffith, John Keprios, Amy Kerber, Bill McCabe, Lois Ring, Anne Spooner, Ruth Valgemae. Lois Ring thanked Naomi Griffith for all her help with editing /writing and being such an active new member. A motion was made and approved that the minutes will be sent out by Anne Spooner. October 2010 minutes approved with changes. FINANCIAL REPORT: Lois Ring reported that the estimated income from TOC was $850. The button income is now at $443. For 2011 $7,500 should be approved for EPAC by city council. Lois Ring expressed concern on how future funds will be managed. Bill McCabe volunteered to keep track of EPAC finances for 2011. CONTINUING BUSINESS (Action List): Lois Ring contacted the People's Choice winners and they were elated. The winners are: 1 st Place " The Plunge by Deb Zeller 2nd Place - Reflecting on Friendship by Nicholas Legeros 3rd Place - Holy Big Bird by Stephen Fischer Payments for 1 st & 2nd place People's Choice winners will come from the Edina Community Foundation. Third place award winner will receive payment from Taste of Creativity fund raiser. CALL FOR SCULPTURES SCHEDULE 2011: Brad Benn confirmed that the 2011 call for sculptors will be sent on December 2010. PLAQUES: Brad Benn suggested that inexpensive plastic plaques are worth having for the sculptures. John Keprios said that even though the guidelines state that the sculpture cost $5,000 or more, it is fine to have plaques to help identify the artist. Motion carried that plaques will be ordered by Brad Benn and placed at Time Piece, The Plunge, Reflecting on Friendship, and Holy Big Bird. Brad Benn presented a proof of the plaque. Lois Ring suggested the word "artist" be included on the plaque to identify the person better. The plaque will read: "A gift to the City of Edina made possible by contributions to the Edina Community Foundation." Motion approved. Naomi Griffith and Lois Ring have been working on a new donor letter and a working proof was presented for review. KODIAK SCULPTURE UPDATE: Lois Ring reported on a recent meeting at city hall with Bill McCabe, Brad Benn and Police Officer Kevin Rofidal regarding a proposed sculpture of Kodiak. Kevin Rofidal stated that the dog sculpture should reflect German Shepherd police dogs in general and a likeness of Kodiak is not needed. He also indicated that there will be input from Scott Neal and nothing will be decided until 2011. Lois Ring gave EPAC's policies to Kevin Rofidal. Ruth Valgemae stated that we should include a Police and a Crime Fund representative. Lois Ring recommended that the Chief of Police will be involved and John Keprios mentioned that the Chief of Police sits on the Crime Fund Board. Lois Ring recommended that a committee be organized to head up this project with input . from EPAC and EAC. John Keprios clarified that the original intent was to build a canine memorial at Braemar Park but the latest plan is to postpone this discussion until 2011. LION SCULPTURE: Bill McCabe reported that the Lion head has now been placed at the art center, near the Greer Garden and the EAC Board will determine whether the Lion will remain at the art center permanently. Lois suggested a thank you letter be sent to the donor. EAC /EPAC RELATIONSHIP DOCUMENT: Bill McCabe reported that this has been approved by the EAC Board. Lois Ring requested that EPAC receive a final copy. Ruth Valgemae will email the final copy to all EPAC committee members. MEMBERSHIP: Lois Ring reported there is no new news from Dick Crockett. MARKETING & PROMOTION: Lois Ring will handle the publicity about the People's Choice winners and will archive the recent Edina Magazine article featuring EPAC. MEMBERSHIP ROSTER: Anne Spooner will resend final. LETTERHEAD: The letterhead is now completed and came out well. A final sample was handed out by Lois Ring along with a final copy of Policies and Procedures. V. MOSAIC PROJECT UPDATE: The hope is that this will be in place by the next Promenade opening. John Keprios reported that for safety reasons the mosaic can only be on the sides of the York Avenue bridge, not in the center. An agreement should be drafted saying the county won't be held responsible for any damage made to the mosaic and the agreement should be exact. Brad Benn stated there are eight places for mosaics on the bridge. NEW BUSINESS: Naomi Griffith and Lois Ring have been updating EPAC accomplishments and indicated it will include activities from the beginning. She will request additions via email from committee members. Lois Ring did research and determined that EPAC does qualify for a grant through the Metropolitan Regional Arts Council funded by the McKnight Foundation. Lois Ring asked for assistance from those experienced with grant writing to take this on. It will be a lot of work but worth the effort. Bill McCabe volunteered to review the information Lois Ring obtained about the grant and provide feedback. We do not qualify for State Arts Board grants. John Keprios provided information regarding the proposed Veteran's Memorial saying that the Veteran's Memorial Committee has very strong feelings about the type of sculpture it will be; not a soldier but something more generic such as an eagle or a globe. The purpose of the memorial is to honor past, present, and future veterans. It is located at Uttley Park, 50th and Wooddale, on the south side. Plans include a raised hard surface area which will accommodate a gathering of 150 people. Granite tablets and benches will be included with good visibility, on the 4t of July parade route in addition to parking and restroom facilities. Currently there is a call being drafted for an architect. EPAC questioned whether there should be an artist call first. The committee is asking city council for $30,000 seed money to jump start the project. John Keprios estimates it will cost $300,000. Ruth Valgemae asked if a liaison is needed to sit in on their meetings. John Keprios will inquire about that. Brad Benn suggested that an outline be created which can then be distributed to potential artists. John Keprios asked EPAC if they are interested in this project and wish to provide help in finding an artist. Brad Benn made a motion to cooperate with the Veteran's Committee to assist them in any way we can. Motion carried. UTILITY BILL: Brad Benn will check with the water department for an updated list of donors. Lois Ring requested a list of donors from Jennifer Bennerotte. Once we get the list, the thank you notes will be coordinated. PROMENADE PHASE 4: Lois Ring asks for more information as to when this will occur. The last stage had inclusion of a holding pond behind Byerly's. This may impact the Promenade. More discussion will follow as information is obtained. Lois Ring reminded all to attend the upcoming meet and greet with new City Manager Scott Neal and introduce themselves. Meeting adjourned at 5:OOpm. Next meeting will be January 6, 2011. Minutes taken by Anne Spooner. .� , ,may �; =-=•'. a d o` THE GREEN MRCHINE January 12, 2011 Greetings from the Green Machine! Edina Robotics FIRST Team 1816 The Green Machine Emily Benson — Captain Michael Woolsey — Co- Captain contact @edinarobotics.com RECEIVED JAN 18 2011 The membership of Edina Robotics FIRST Team 1816 formally invites you to SPARK Day, Sponsor and Parent Appreciation, Recognition, and Kudos. Please join us on Saturday January 29th for refreshments and tours of our computer room and our shop area and to see our team in mid - season build action. We will demonstrate building, designing on CAD, programming and more featuring our 2011 robot, Zeebo. We will have a welcome table set up in the main vestibule of Valley View Middle School, 6750 Valley View Road, Edina, from 12 pm -2 pm. Our team ambassadors will set you up with a treat, N a beverage, and a tour guide. Thank you for your continued support of our program. Please RSVP to contact@edinarobotics.com. We can't wait to see you! With best regards, Emily Benson, Captain Michael Woolsey, Co- captain Edina Robotics FIRST Team 1816- The Green Machine Edina Robotics FIRST Team 1816, The Green Machine, is a wholly- endorsed school activity of Edina High School. In accordance with Edina School District Policy, all donations on behalf of Team 1816 are fully tax deductible. W9 certification & information available upon request. -� Deb From: ;ent: To: Subject: Attachments: Dear Deb, Kenealy - Bredice, Mary < Mary. Kenealy - Bredice @minnetonka.kl2.mn.us> -'- Tuesday, January 18, 20112:56 PM O $ Deb Mangen fL 2011 FW: Carson Hills project Street Improvement Letter.doc ..'araM I received your email after calling the general number. My husband and I would like the city council members to receive this letter. I am also faxing a partial petition (there were other people gathering names as well) to you. Thank you, Mary Kenealy- Bredice 952 215 -6974 cell .... _ _._...._ _..... ... From: Kenealy- Bredice, Mary Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 2:51 PM To: 'edinamail @ci.edina.mn.us' Subject: Carson Hills project 1 January 17, 2011 o��sEA c ~' JAN 18 2011 Dear Edina City Council Member: R IV® We are writing to express our thoughts regarding the Carson Hills Street Improvement Project. We do not speak for all residents in the Carson's Hill area but we believe that it is important for you as our representatives on the City Council to listen to your Edina residents. To date, there have been two informational meetings open to residents and presented by the City engineers. The information presented by the engineers describes the nature of the project, timeline and goals. The presentations have not included any information on how the decision was made to conduct the Carson Hills Street Improvement project, the criteria to determining that such a project is needed and no information on how residents can voice their concerns about the value of this project and assessment residents are expected to pay. We asked the City Engineer Mr. Sullivan to provide the background on how Edina streets are evaluated for improvements and how such evaluations are prioritized when comparing all street evaluations in the city. Initially, Mr. Sullivan provided only an evaluation of the Carson Hills streets which shows ratings of streets based on an assessment rating between 1 and 100. Streets in the worst condition would be rated lower and those in the best condition rated higher. After multiple requests we did receive a fully assessment for the entire City, but in December. Now that we have some context for understanding the system for assessing street conditions we also have significant concerns regarding the overall communication process. The City engineers are providing information based on the expectation that the street improvement project will take place. As residents of Edina we must bear some burden for the cost of this project and the timing could not be worse. Property values are not increasing, in fact, property values are going down. Taxation based on property values continues to increase. Given the current climate, it is critical that the Edina City Council members understand that the Carson Hills Street Improvement project may not be in everyone's best interest at this time. The City needs to demonstrate that the improvements planned for our streets and the assessment placed on residents are justified in terms of overall property values. Residents should be able to realize an increase in their property values as a result of improvements. We do not see the value added component of this project. It is also unrealistic to assume that because the city has done few intermediate measures to maintain the streets,that now the cost of replacing the pavement must be entirely paid for by special assessment. We do see an opportunity for the City of Edina to create work for city employees at a time when other municipalities are not taking on'street improvement projects .underwritten by their residents. We believe that the City of Edina needs to show proof that this street improvement project adds value. If this cannot.,be proven the City should not be permitted to proceed with this project. This would be.a violation of state law. Respectfully, Rick and -Mary Bredice Deb Mangen From: Kenealy - Bred ice, Mary < Mary. Kenealy - Bredice @minnetonka.kl2.mn.us> G ,ent: Tuesday, January 18, 20113:50 PM To: Deb Mangen cj`U Subject: FW: Carson Hills project Attachments: street 2 001.jpg; street 1 001.jpg; street 3 001.jpg u! From: Kenealy - Bredice, Mary Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 20113:11 PM To: 'Kaylin Martin' Subject: RE: Carson Hills project I am attaching three pages that I scanned. Our fax is not working. Please also forward to engineering and the city council members. Thank you, Mary Kenealy- Bredice From: Kaylin Martin [mailto:kmartin @ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 20112:58 PM To: Kenealy- Bredice, Mary Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Carson Hills project Thank you for your interest in the City of Edina. Your message was forwarded upon receipt to members of the Edina City Council. If I can be of additional assistance, please contact me. Kaylin Martin, Communications Assistant 952- 833 -9537 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 kmartin @ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com /Police ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Kenealy- Bredice, Mary [ma ilto: Mary. Kenealy - Bredice @minnetonka.k12.mn.us] Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 20112:51 PM To: Kaylin Martin Subject: Carson Hills project 1 P E D I N A Cam' CO UN PETITION TO POSTPONE CARSON'S HILL STREET RECONSTRUCTION NO. BA -370 The following residents within the Carson's Hill Street Reconstruction Improvement No: BA -370 are not in favor of conducting the road construction at this time because the roadways are in good condition, the curbs and gutters are sound, street lights are not desired, sewers are not problematic nor is traffic. In view of the current economic conditions we respectfully request to postpone construction in this area. A,- City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL v' 4801 West 50" Street •Edina, Minnesota 55424 (952) 927 -8861 • (952) 927 -7645 FAX • (612) 927 -5461 TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ❑ SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WATER. MAIN ❑ STOR 4 SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET OTHER: � Lf C)( On nIS SURFACING WITH I't I 5 2 CURB AND GUTTER Yi To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask. the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. between LOCATION OF IMPROVL:MENT BY STREET NAME LOCATION OF I.WR01'EWNT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS and ADDRESS between -__and ADDRESS between an LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS d ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF 01PRO%TMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS , IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERS'T'AND TI[AT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPER'T'IES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE y OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) KenecJl — re ce- q I PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRLNTED) - ao Kou Y-n'l r brLve_ r („la 7�. A�,����.;. This petition was circulated by: �J� CIO NA M L J ADDRLS PHONE There is spacefor."re signatures on t4l*k. . - APRIL 200£3 l' PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME SIGNATURE (PRINTED) ,1 J, SPY' <tAVf- Caf �Ilas -�rns This petition was circulated by: 'PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) C, vc- j�4 boz o► (IL NAME ADDRESS PHONE The Minnesota Data Practices Act requires that we inform you of your rights about the private data we are requesting on this form. Under lire law, your telephone number is private data. This petition when submitted will become public information. There is no consequence for reftaing to supply this information. You may attach extra pages with signatures. i APRIL 2008 i - - - -- Original Message - - - -- [A�CEIVED From: Toni Cady [mailto:tonicady @yahoo.com] JAN 1 8 2011 Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 1:41 PM To: Kaylin Mai tin - - - - -- Subject: Golf at Braemar I have played golf at Braemar for the past 15 years or so and am concerned with the revenue losses that seem to have no end in sight. Perhaps, there is_ a need for an impartial assessment to be made by an outside expert in this field, because,previous actions taken to alleviate this problem have obviously not been effective. I realize that many golf courses across the nation -Ate having similar problems due, largely, to a troubled 'economy:.It `would,, therefor, be very prudent for Edina to make use of all. available resources;. internal and external, to ensure the future of Braemar Golf course. And.while we all may wish that things remain the same, sometimes that is impossible. Yours truly, " Toni M. Cady 6428 Timber Ridge Edina 55439 From: kris strawbridge [ma i Ito: krisstrawbridge @yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 11:10 AM ---- - - -___ To: Kaylin Martin Subject: Braemar Golf Course To whom it may conern: I am writing to tell you of my concern for Braemar Golf Course. I have read and heard of the low profits and loss of revenue at Braemar. I feel very strongly that outside consultants need to be hired to give a fresh start and modern business ideas to help save this wonderful city golf course. Sincerely, Kris Strawbridge From: Sandra Fox [mailto:matrixusa @aol.com] Sent: Saturday, January 15, 20118:53 PM To: John Keprios Subject: Golf course study Dear John JAN 18 20$1 I was just watching the Park Board meeting and if they do form a citizens task force, I would like to be considered. I would represent the players who are not in a league who play regularly. I believe there are many of us who play a couple a times a week who are not formally affiliated and might get overlooked in forming such a task force. Thanks, Sandy Fox 952 944 7993 A MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Heritage Preservation Board Tuesday, December 14, 2010, 7:00 PM Edina Community Room 4801 50th Street West MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Joel Stegner, Chris Rofidal, Jean Rehkamp Larson, Bob Schwartzbauer, Arlene Forrest, Claudia Carr, Colleen Curran, Katherine McLellan, Ross Davis, and Lauren Thorson MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner OTHERS PRESENT: Robert Vogel, Heritage Preservation Consultant I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: November 9, 2010 Member Rofidal moved approval of the minutes from the November 9, 2010 meeting. Member Carr seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. II. COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT: Certificates of Appropriateness (COA) A. H -10 -04 4501 Casco Avenue — Remove a detached garage and build an addition with an attached garage Staff Report Planner Repya reminded the Board that this item was first heard at the October HPB meeting, when the applicant proposed the removal of an existing detached garage and a 2 story attached garage addition to the rear of the home. At that time, the Board expressed concern to the following elements of that plan: • The height of the proposed addition exceeded the height of the original home by two feet - creating massing that overwhelmed the original home; and • The south wall of the home with the addition appeared stark - being over 80 feet in length with no design relief. At the applicant's request, the COA review was continued to enable a revision of the plans to address the HPB's concerns. Ms. Repya reported that the plans presented for consideration address the concerns raised by the HPB, the revised plans demonstrate: • The roof of the addition has been lowered to match the roof height of the existing house. fo Minutes Heritage Preservation Board December 14, 2010 The concerns regarding the starkness of the south elevation of the addition were addressed by avoiding a straight plane and adding dimension /architectural interest with a bump out that mirrors one on the original home. The revised plan also provides a half - timbered gable roof on the south elevation. A gable roof was added to the addition on the north elevation over the garage that is lower than the rest of the addition, thus reducing the mass. The third garage stall on the east side was set back two feet from the plane of the other stalls and inset one foot from the south wall — reducing the mass. Additional changes made to ensure that the addition compliments the original home include: The north gable peak repeats the half- timber theme from the west gable peak. The entry door on the north elevation repeats the stone arch and gable tie -in theme from the main entry; and More dimension and interest was provided on the north elevation by setting the garage back, bringing the front door forward and adding the gable. Upon evaluating the revised plans, Consultant Robert Vogel found that the applicant has redesigned the addition in response to the concerns expressed by the HPB. The plans now appear to meet the criteria established for new construction in the Country Club Qistrict, thus he would recommend approval. Ms. Repya added that Staff agrees with Consultant Vogel and too recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness. Findings supporting the recommendation include: 1. The proposed addition meets the design review standards and guidelines for construction of new homes in the Country Club District. 2. The changes from the original proposal, including lowering the roof over the garage and adding dimension and architectural detail to the south elevation of the addition have addressed concerns expressed by the HPB. 3. The proposed addition is now compatible with the original home and neighboring historic homes. 4. Construction of an attached garage is in character and appropriate in the Country Club District. Staff further recommends that the approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness be subject to: • The plans presented • A year built plaque displayed on the addition. Board Comments Several board members asked for clarification of design elements associated with the plans. 41 Minutes Heritage Preservation Board December 14, 2010 Member Davis opined that he had been concerned with the south elevation portrayed on the initial plans, and was pleased that the revised plans addressed those concerns. Member Stegner stated that he liked the plans as redesigned. Member Rehkamp Larson stated that she liked many of the changes to the plans, but pointed out that the gable on the addition's south elevation appeared wide and out of scale with the older home. She pointed out that by dropping the gable and providing a steeper pitch, that portion of the south wall would be more compatible. Ms. Rehkamp Larson also noted that on the east fagade of the north elevation, the placement of a window, serving the stairwell would make sense for both the exterior and interior design. Board members agreed that Ms. Rehkamp Larson raised some good design alternatives. Homeowner Comments Charles Layton, 4501 Casco Avenue explained that a lot of work went into the proposed plans to address the concerns the Board expressed at the October meeting. He appreciated Member Rehkamp Larson's suggestions for the plans and stated that he would like the ability to consider them, and if they do fit within their scheme, incorporate those changes with the final plans. Board Decision The Board briefly discussed Mr. Layton's request to allow for the possibility of incorporating the two changes proposed by Ms. Rehkamp Larson. Member Schwartzbauer moved approval of the proposed revised plans subject to the conditions recommended by Staff, to include the plans presented, with the ability to make the two changes to the south and west elevations suggested by Ms. Rehkamp Larson. Member Davis seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. B. H -10 -06 4901 Sunnyside Road — Demolish existing home and construct a new home Staff Report Planner Repya reminded the Board that they had initially reviewed preliminary plans for the subject COA request at the November 9, 2010, meeting. At that time, the plans were well received with the Board requesting no changes to the final plans. The final plans provided for HPB approval demonstrate a few changes from those reviewed at the November meeting in the following areas: • The building was repositioned on the lot one foot to the west, thus providing a N Minutes Heritage Preservation Board December 14, 2010 five foot (former six foot) side yard setback for the garage at the northwest corner, and an 11.25 foot (former 10.25 foot) side yard setback at the southeast corner. • All double hung windows now have muntins or grids on both the upper and lower sashes. • Additional windows were added to the garage doors to provide for more natural light. Consultant Robert Vogel reviewed the final plans and concluded that they meet the criteria established for new construction in the Country Club District, thus he would recommend approval. Ms. Repya added that Staff too recommends approval of the plans for the replacement home at 4901 Sunnyside Road. Findings supporting that recommendation include: 1. The applicant has met all of the procedural requirements required for the replacement of a non - historic resource in the Country Club District. 2. The proposed plan meets the criteria set out in the design review guidelines of the Country Club District Plan of Treatment. 3. Construction of an attached front loading garage is in character and appropriate with the homes abutting Minnehaha Creek in the Country Club District. Staff also recommends the following conditions for approval: 1. Historical and architectural documentation of the existing house and garage is provided to include digital photographs and a written description of the house and its known history. 2. The home is built subject to the plans presented. 3. A sign (not to exceed 6 sq. ft.) with a rendering of the approved home is displayed on the property. 4. A year built plaque is displayed on the home. 5. Photographs of all elevations of the new construction shall be provided once the house is completed. Board Comments A brief discussion ensued regarding the shifting of the side yard setback. The Board also asked for clarification of building materials. Applicant Comments Andy Porter, Refined, LLC provided a material board representing the siding, trim and roofing materials proposed for the home. Mr. Porter asked the Board for flexibility in choosing either asphalt or cedar shake shingles for the roofing material. Mr. Porter added that he had presented the plans for the home to all of the surrounding neighbors and received no negative comments. e Minutes Heritage Preservation Board December 14, 2010 Board Decision The Board briefly discussed the final plans presented - all agreeing that the proposed home would complement both its surroundings and the District as a whole. Member Forrest moved approval of the final plans for the new home at 4901 Sunnyside Road subject to the conditions outlined by Staff; adding that the roofing material may be either asphalt or cedar shake shingles. Member Rofidal seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. C. H -10 -07 4408 Country Club Road — Demolish existing home and construct a new home Staff Report Planner Repya explained that the subject property is located northwest corner of Country Club Road and Moorland Avenue. The existing home is a split -level Ranch style constructed in 1955. A 2 -stall attached garage is located on the south side of the home facing Country Club Road. The COA request involves demolishing the existing home with the intention of building a new home with attached garage that meets the district's plan of treatment criteria. The existing home is not classified as an historic resource since it was constructed after the District's period of significance (1924 — 1944), thus its demolition is not an issue; however the construction of a replacement home is subject to the HPB review and approval. The proposed replacement home is a two -story, Tudor style with an attached 3 -car garage accessed from a driveway in the same location on the south side of the property. The applicant has indicated that the home is being designed for a buyer and not on speculation. The proposed height of the home at the peak is 31'8 ". The adjacent home at 4622 Moorland Avenue has a ridge height of 294". When implementing the HPB's process for calculating the maximum height allowed at no more than 10% higher than the average height of the home, a maximum height of 32.2' would be permissible. Note that the new home (2003) built across the street at 4619 Moorland Avenue measures 36.4' from grade to the highest peak. The exterior materials proposed for the home include natural stone veneer and stucco walls; Hardi -board trim bands, frieze and fascia (option cedar); a 2 tiered brick stone cap on the south and east elevations; and asphalt (optional cedar or faux slate) shingles. Also, a stucco front entry, open on the sides with stone trim surrounding a wood front door is proposed. Ms. Repya reported that the applicant has contacted surrounding residents, and City notices were mailed to the same property owners. Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel reviewed the proposed project and observed that 1 Minutes Heritage Preservation Board December 14, 2010 the demolition of nonhistoric /noncontributing properties in the Country Club District is appropriate only when the new construction is designed to be compatible with the architectural character of the homes constructed during the district's period of historical significance. The plans presented show a house that would meet the design review guidelines.for new home construction in the district plan of treatment. The proposed new house is in all respects a contemporary design, but it appears to be visually compatible with the historic period revival style homes in the neighborhood and should not detract from their historic character. New homes in the district are not required to imitate the character - defining Tudor, Colonial, or Mediterranean style details that contribute to the historic significance of the district: they only need to be compatible in scale, massing, size, and texture with other homes in the neighborhood. Mr. Vogel added the he believes the contemporary design submitted is appropriate and the COA should be approved with the usual conditions. He also recommended architectural recordation of the existing home prior to demolition. The documentation (to be provided by the developer) should consist of digital photographs, line drawings of the floor plan and principal elevations, and a brief written description of the house and its known history. This information would be useful for research purposes and for educating the public about the post -1940s history of the Country Club neighborhood. Ms. Repya pointed out that the review process for a replacement of a non - historic resource home in the Country Club District entails a 2 -step process. The plans currently under consideration are fulfilling the first step. Staff recommends that the HPB provide the applicant with feedback on the proposed plans, identifying any desired changes. The applicant will then take into consideration the information received when drafting final plans to be presented for approval at the January 11, 2011, HPB meeting. Applicant's Presentation Andy Porter, Refined LLC explained that the proposed home is not being designed on speculation, but rather for a client. Thus, his firm has carefully worked on creating a home that blends the client's vision with the existing character of the historic neighborhood. The plans closely reflect the style of many of the original homes in the district, and compliment the stately street presence of neighboring homes on Moorland Avenue. Mr. Porter pointed out that they designed the home to meet the criteria for new construction set out in the Country Club District Plan of Treatment as well as the requirements of the City's Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Porter added that because the front door of the proposed home is parallel to Moorland Avenue, an address change to 4624 Moorland Avenue will be requested. The City's Building Inspector has advised Mr. Porter that as long as the front door abuts Moorland Avenue, the address change would not be a problem. Minutes Heritage Preservation Board December 14, 2010 Board Comments Board members asked Mr. Porter for clarification on several aspects of the proposed plans. Particular questions were raised regarding: • The south elevation to include the setback and long expanse of wall; and • The size and protrusion of the front porch (Mr. Porter's response — One of the appealing features of the lot is the sizable back yard that would be diminished if the setback for the south elevation was increased more than what is required by the Zoning Ordinance.) Member Rofidal appreciated the streetscape that was provided for Moorland Avenue, and asked that a similar streetscape be provided for Country Club Road specifically showing the proposed home and the abutting home to the west at 4629 Browndale Avenue. Member Rehkamp Larson observed that she was not concerned about the placement of the home, however found the complexity of the roof to be lacking in execution and somewhat troubling. (Mr. Porter's response — There is a lot of depth to the plan that is not captured in the 2 dimensional plans presented. The intent of the design was to get away from having a long expanse of straight planes. The final plans will be 3 dimensional, and hopefully the roofing system will clearer.) Member Stegner stated that there doesn't appear to be continuity with the size of the windows on the south and north elevations. (Mr. Porter's response — Again, the depth of the structure not visible in the 2 dimensional plans alters the relationship of the windows. The 3 dimensional plans will demonstrate the varying planes and the lack of symmetry regarding the size of the windows will make sense.) Member Forrest stated that the placement of the windows makes sense on the elevations and planes where they are placed. She asked Mr. Porter if he would be able to provide the Board with a landscape plan, particularly of the south elevation due to the long expanse and prominence on the streetscape. Member Schwartzbauer stated that he found the proposed plans very fitting for the neighborhood and more in keeping than the 1955 home being replaced. Neighborhood Comments Member Carr observed that the Board received an email from Jane Lonnquist, 4510 Drexel Avenue who had reviewed the plans and opined that the front entry appeared bulky. Joe Sullivan, 4409 Country Club Road explained that he lives across the street from the proposed home, and may be the most impacted of any neighbor. He stated that he has reviewed the plans, has no concerns, and believes it to be a fantastic project. Minutes Heritage Preservation Board December 14, 2010 Janet Asselstine Lederle, 4507 Browndale Avenue explained that her father is selling the home to Mr. Porter, and she appreciates the Certificate of Appropriateness process. She added that she is glad that the review process has a strong emphasis on maintaining the character of the neighborhood. Chair Stegner announced that the purpose of the current HPB review was to provide the applicant with feedback on the plans which will be used for designing the final plans. As a recap, the following issues were suggested to be addressed in the final plans: • A landscape plan of the south elevation • A 3 dimensional plan of the proposed home • Minimize the front porch • A streetscape of Country Club Road depicting the proposed home and 4629 Browndale Avenue; and • Evaluate the windows on the south and north elevations for symmetry. At the January 11, 2011 meeting, final plans will be presented, and at that time, the Board will make a decision. Member Rofidal suggested that the same neighbors who were notified of the December review of the plans again be notified of the final, January review. Planner Repya agreed to send notice of the January meeting. No Action was taken. MORNINGSIDE BUNGALOW STUDY: Planner Repya provided the Board with the following information relative to the Morningside Bungalow Study: 1) An Executive Summary of the Morningside Bungalow Study drafted by Member Colleen Curran. Board members agreed that Ms. Curran did an excellent job of consolidating the 40 page report into two pages that do an excellent job of laying out the important elements of the study. Member Stegner pointed out that while the summary references the CLG grant, it does not call out the dollar amount. Planner Repya agreed to check into the protocol for identifying funding sources. Following a brief discussion, all agreed that the summary should be included in the report when posted on the web site. 2) A tentative Communications Plan drafted by Member Colleen Curran. Member Curran explained that she designed the Bungalow Study Communication plan with a template of a plan she uses in her workplace. Board members agreed that the plan would go far to keeping the project on task, and thanked Ms. Curran for providing her organizational skills and leadership. 3) A newsletter conveying important information on the Morningside Bungalow Study drafted by Member Claudia Carr. Member Carr created a newsletter using Microsoft Publisher which in 4 pages, communicated pertinent information from the Bungalow Study and explained the Minutes Heritage Preservation Board December 14, 2010 landmark designation process. Board members expressed their delight with the document, agreeing that the format was very inviting and the information conveyed was right on. Planner Repya explained that she shared a copy of the document with the City's Communications Director, Jennifer Bennerotte who praised Ms. Carr's work. Ms. Bennerotte did comment that by referring to the piece as a "newsletter" the assumption could be made that the next issue would be forthcoming. As an alternative, Ms. Bennerotte suggested using the term "bulletin" since this would be a one- time publication. Board members agreed with Ms. Bennerotte's rationale. Planner Repya further explained that for the document to be published on the City's web site, Ms. Bennerotte will make a few changes to provide for consistency with Edina's publishing policies. Following a brief discussion, Member Carr agreed to add a section on the history of Morningside for inclusion in the bulletin. 4) Potential logos for the Morningside neighborhood. (Option 1 or 2 ?) Planner Repya presented two logos created by Edina's Communications and Marketing Department for the Morningside neighborhood. Both logos depict a streetcar with the year "1905" and the text "Morningside Neighborhood ". The differences between the two logos were subtle; however the Board agreed that Option 1 was preferable. The logo will be used when conveying information to the Morningside neighborhood and on the street signs as they are replaced, in the same manner as the logo created for the Country Club District. IV. COMMUNITY COMMENT: None V. 2010 GOALS & OBJECTIVES: Continued from November Meeting Board Member Curran created an annual work plan for the HPB outlining the work to be undertaken for the year, month by month. The HPB thanked Ms. Curran for her work and agreed that would be an excellent approach to making sure items don't slip between the cracks. It was agreed that they would discuss the work plan in more detail at the January meeting. VI. 2011 CALENDAR & MEETING SCHEDULE: Planner Repya presented the 2011 calendar and meeting schedule to the Board. A short discussion ensued, no changes were proposed. VII. OTHER BUSINESS: A. Historic Resource Lending Library Planner Repya presented the Board with a list of historic resources that will be provided on the HPB section of the City's website. Ms. Repya pointed out that the Edina 0 Minutes Heritage Preservation Board December 14, 2010 Foundation provided a grant to purchase resources for the lending library. With the help of the City's Communication's Department, an electronic check -out system will be implemented whereby one simply needs to request an item on line; they will be informed of the availability and instructed when they may pick up the resource at City Hall. It was suggested that a two week time limit with the ability to renew for an additional two weeks would make sense for the program. Board members were very pleased with the proposed lending library and agreed to work on continually updating the library with valuable historic resources to include books, pamphlets, magazines or web sites. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE: None IX. NEXT MEETING DATE: January 11, 2011 X. ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 9:25 PM Respectfully submitted, Joyce R.epya 10 P Minutes of the Edina Park Board December 14, 2010 Edina City Hall, Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Austin Dummer, Bill Lough, Todd Fronek, Ellen Jones, Jennifer Kenney; Felix Pronove, Randy Meyer, Joseph Hulbert, Louise Segreto. MEMBERS ABSENT: Dan Peterson, Rob Presthus, Keeya Steel STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton, Todd Anderson I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES Louise Segreto MOVED TO APPROVE THE NOVEMBER 9, 2010 PARK BOARD MINUTES. Jennifer Kenney SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. H. NEW BUSINESS A. Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse' Consultant - Mr. Keprios reminded the Park Board that at the'November Park Board meeting he was asked to do a little more research to see what he could find regarding consulting services and the benefits it might bring the golf course. He indicated that it seemed to make sense to him, that if they were to spend that kind of money, maybe they could look into the Braemar Memorial Fund. Therefore, he asked Todd Anderson, Braemar Golf Course Manager, to call on the Braemar Golf Association Men's Club because that would be the proper protocol for using those funds and see if there would be any interest or support on their behalf to utilize the funds for that purpose. He stated'that the Braemar Golf Association has a wonderful group of volunteers and they were kind enough to spend some time with Mr. Anderson and himself as well as they submitted a letter that is in the Park Board packet. Mr. Keprios pointed out that he also asked the Park Board members to submit some of their ideas on what they think should be looked at down the road if they were to hire a consultant and thanked those members who responded. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that he contacted the two vendors that Mr. Hulbert had been in touch with and asked them to submit a proposal and both vendors did. He stated that if they were to go that route the least expensive would be Sirius which he thinks would do a good job in covering what it is the Park Board is looking for. Mr. Keprios pointed out that he thinks what he is hearing from their constituents at the golf course and the golf association is that even though a lot of the ideas are great and there are things that need to be looked at, it is their collective opinion that the new management is very capable as well as there is a lot of brain power in their volunteers. who play the game and are patrons of the course. Therefore, they feel they can put themselves on the right track and essentially do their own consulting and save money. Mr. Keprios commented that is not to say they have to go that route; it just means that they are not going to recommend spending Braemar Memorial funds to do it. He noted IV they would need to use money from Braemar Golf Course operating funds if the Park Board approves the proposal to hire a consultant. Mr. Keprios indicated that from staff perspective he thinks they ought to give their new management an opportunity to address a lot of these things and welcomes every Park Board member to be engaged in that process. Ms. Segreto indicated that there seems to be an issue about whether or not the memorial funds can be used in connection with what they are discussing. She asked if it would be appropriate to have the city attorney advise them about whether or not the funds are available. Mr. Keprios replied that it would be appropriate but the Golf Association is recommending that it not be used for this particular purpose. He noted that they probably have some projects in mind long -term that they would like to save those funds for. Ms. Segreto asked who controls the memorial fund money and asked if the Golf Association is the governing body for disbursement of the funds. Mr. Keprios replied as it states in the Park Board packet, the Braemar Golf Association's input is to be taken seriously and is very valuable; however, at the end of the day it is the City Council's decision. Ms. Segreto asked if they are advisory to which Mr. Keprios replied yes, that is correct. Mr. Lough asked if they have ever had an outside consultant engaged to study Braemar Golf Course and make recommendations about its operations. Mr. Keprios replied at one time they had "secret shoppers" that went to all of the facilities pretending to be customers and would write a report on what they found and what type of customer service they received. He noted as far as having a consultant to study the efficiencies and the business plan the answer is no. However, they have had consultants more than once study the course and its layout as well as the clubhouse when they went through the exercise of expanding the golf course and clubhouse, but not anything that is similar to what is now on the table. He noted that to his knowledge we have not hired outside consultants to study the all Braemar Golf Course operations. Mr. Lough asked approximately what the percentage of empty tee times is over the course of the season. Mr. Anderson replied that's a tough question because it varies dramatically. He noted that between the original two nines (1 through 18) they are probably at 80% capacity. He noted the new nine is at capacity on evenings and weekends but during the day is the tough spot. Mr. Anderson pointed out, in looking at the numbers of other golf courses, Braemar is doing very, very well. Mr. Lough asked what is being done to fill up the empty tee times to which Mr. Anderson responded they are putting more money into marketing and conditioning the course. Next year they will try to put more money into marketing the new nine during the weekday hours earlier in the day where they are falling a little short. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that they are currently in the process of updating their business plan which is done for every enterprise facility. He indicated they work with Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications Director, and that the business plans address a lot of those questions of marketing, identifying who the customer is and where they should focus their advertising dollars. Mr. Lough asked when the business plan will be ready. Mr. Keprios replied a lot is going to depend on how quickly they can get all of their data together but should be ready by spring 2011. Mr. Lough asked Mr. Anderson that given the scheduled tee times are a vanishing asset has he ever looked at or pursued what he would call "innovative pricing policies" to tee times. Mr. Anderson replied that he has done quite a bit of research into that area and he believes it's a short term fix to a long term detriment. He stated that once you lower your price point to a certain level that's what your customer remembers your price being. He indicated Braemar has a great location and they are improving the quality of the product so he really doesn't feel that they should be dropping the price with the exception of some very off times. He added that a number of courses have dropped their prices dramatically and he thinks if the economy ever rebounds people aren't going to remember them being a $50.00 course but rather a $20.00 course. Mr. Fronek indicated that by hiring a consultant it appears to him that this would have somewhat of a return on an investment. Mr. Keprios replied he doesn't think there is any argument that hiring a consultant would probably have a return on investment. He noted that he thinks the argument is the collective wisdom from the volunteers is that they can do the same thing without paying for a consultant. They feel that our new management ought to be given the opportunity to implement a lot of the input that he is hearing from the people who play the course as well as the knowledge of decades of experience Mr. Anderson has to prove we are on the right track and save $15,000 because in the end it will be the same result. Mr. Hulbert stated he wants to see Mr. Anderson get on the right track and succeed and he sees this as an opportunity to help Mr. Anderson succeed. He noted that he thinks one thing a consultant could do is help to prioritize our needs and wants at Braemar. Mr. Hulbert pointed out that they've talked about people not wanting to play the new nine for various reasons but they would bring in an architect to help address some of those concerns of why people don't want to play that course. He added they will conduct a survey of the golfers that we have and get demographics of the players that are out there so that we can target our marketing efforts towards the people that play the course and want to continue to play the course and for those who have never played it. He stated this isn't an investment in a depreciating item, it's an investment to try to get Braemar back into profitability and find new and creative ways along with the ideas staff has. Mr. Hulbert indicated it's not an indictment of management or staff or patrons of the course, it's an investment in ways to compliment and grow our community park asset and that's the way he is trying to present it and look at it. Mr. Segreto indicated she agrees with Mr. Hulbert especially in light of trying to write a business plan because she does believe there would be a return on investment. She stated that with all due respect to the golf association and volunteers, who are valuable to any study process, we need to recognize that their business is really not the analysis of systems of golf operations. Therefore, she feels this should be a time to have a professional come in and take a look. Ms. Segreto asked if there are any local consulting firms who would be better posed to tell them how their golf course stands in the golfing community in the Minnesota area. V Mr. Anderson stated that he is not opposed to fresh eyes and other insights into the golf course and added that he was a consultant to golf courses for 12 plus years so he thinks he has a good feeling about what they would be looking at. He stressed that although he has worked for Braemar for a long time he never had the power to do a lot of things he wanted to do. Therefore, he would appreciate it if staff could be given a little time to do some things because they are on track with doing some of the things mentioned that need to be done and they know what can and can't be done financially because it is complex. Mr. Anderson asked the Park Board to give his staff a little time, even mid- way through the golf season, and if things aren't going the way the Park Board thinks they should be then bring in a consultant. He asked for a little time because it's always been his plan over the winter to do some restructuring and go from there. He noted that he would rather use those monies to implement things than go to a consultant because he knows a consultant will propose a lot of things that right now financially cannot be accomplished. Mr. Keprios asked Mr. Anderson if he is aware of any local consultants in the Minnesota area that would be comparable to the two quotes that we have. Mr. Anderson replied that they did use Al McMurchie who is the Course Manager for Inver Wood Golf Course in Inver Grove Heights, to do an assessment of the driving range and the new nine. He noted that he was dead -on with the driving range but the new nine as far as a return on investment the plan would work but over a course of a longer period of time. Mr. Keprios stated that maybe he needs to do a little more research and if the Park Board would like him to do that he would be happy to go back to the drawing board and find some other local consultants to see if they are competitive and maybe more knowledgeable of the golf courses in this area. He informed the Park Board that he did receive a copy of the study that was done for Apple Valley for Valley Wood Golf Course, a national golf foundation, and they ended up proposing between a 2.5 million up to a concept of a 4.5 million dollar clubhouse replacement and stated that they still have the old building in place even though the study was done in 2005 for $18,000. Mr. Keprios added that their park director seemed to think that the study was marginally beneficial for them. Mr. Hulbert indicated that he really wants to see Mr. Anderson succeed and therefore is trying to present something that will give him ideas so that maybe two years down the road they could be one of those golf courses that goes from losing $200,000 to having a million dollar turn- around and that would be Mr. Anderson's leadership. He noted that he would love to give Mr. Anderson time but he feels the time is now to consider this type of thing. He explained that it's a one week operational review and then they come back in the summer and take a look at that new nine and give us some ideas from a professional architect who does this for a living. Mr. Hulbert indicated that as an example in coming up with a master plan for Countryside Park they brought in a consultant to come up with great ideas and schematic ways for the park to be redesigned to give people some concepts of what could be done. He noted that Mr. Meyer made a great point at their last meeting if they are going to redo the driving range and they want to redo the golf dome shouldn't they be looking at 4 I the big picture. If they want to ultimately have a new clubhouse down the road maybe it makes sense to relocate the golf dome, maybe it makes sense to relocate in the future where the clubhouse would be. Mr. Hulbert stated that these consultants will come in and help them prioritize their capital improvement plans and their wish lists and the things that they want. Mr. Hulbert stated that if they are going to look at putting money into the golf dome to rebuild it or relocate it or if they want to redo the executive nine or rebuild the driving range they are doing it with a long term vision. They are not just doing it because it needs to be now because what if they invest '' /z million dollars on a golf dome and '/2 million dollars into the driving range and say five years later they want to rebuild the clubhouse maybe it would have made more sense to put it someplace else. Mr. Hulbert indicated that he thinks working with a consultant will give them the ability to get together and have some focus and build a long -term plan. He stated that he knows there are a lot of great minds in and around Braemar that want to do the same thing and they would all be part of that process together. He commented that he thinks this is a critical time to take a look at this jewel of our park system that right now is losing money. Mr. Anderson indicated that he appreciates that; however, being the manager now for only a couple of months he doesn't feel that they are at a point where they are going to go under. Therefore, he would ask again to give him until the middle of summer to show the Park Board what he can do. He noted he would be happy to have some consultants come in and he is open to things outside the box. However, he feels it's a little premature at this time because over the winter he has a number of things in place and a number of changes. Mr. Anderson stated he is not against it; however, he would just like to see it pushed back a little bit. Mr. Dummer stated he thinks that we should not throw money into something that's not needed. He noted that he does agree with the idea that they need to take an evaluation with what's going to happen with Braemar; however, he feels Mr. Anderson and his staff can do the evaluation themselves. He indicated that he thinks it's important to be in their hands from the get go all the way to the finish and in his opinion it should be consistent the whole way through. Mr. Anderson commented that over the course of the winter he sees staff putting together a five year master plan and if they could go through this summer or part way through the summer he would be more than happy to have consultants come in and compare it. Mr. Anderson stated that he thinks they are on task to improve Braemar but again he totally is open to another set of eyes. Mr. Meyer indicated that he likes the suggestion of getting a local quote from a consultant; however, he doesn't think they should do an assessment of the course in the middle of the winter but rather schedule it for June or July. He suggested getting a local quote and bringing it back to the next meeting and then choose which one we would like. If there is support for it and it is approved in the $15,000 range then they can proceed with it that way. Mr. Meyer stated that way they can sort of get up and running and proceed with some of their thoughts. He pointed out that the reality is the things V they are talking about are more long -term visions and then having an assessment of that next summer, he thinks would be more appropriate versus bringing someone in from outside the state potentially in the middle of the winter because it probably isn't going to give them the value they are looking for in what they want to do. Mr. Lough indicated that he thinks Mr. Meyer made some good points and he would also like to continue to emphasize that there is some aspect of a turnaround situation which does not relate to five or ten year plans. He noted that he would like see something put together in a way that would emphasize changes from the past. He noted that while existing patrons are certainly a wonderful asset that should be relied upon the fact of where they are at Braemar may also suggest that they try some things that haven't been tried before. He stated while they may get a consultant to come in next summer and review what's been done he would really like to emphasize and urge Mr. Anderson with the time available and with all of the inputs, resources, volunteers and staff that he really works on trying to put together a plan that specifies and isolates changes that are going to be made from how things have been done in the past because it looks as though a turn - around is needed. Rick Windham, 6233 Belmore, indicated that he is the 2011 President of the Braemar's Men's Club and informed the Park Board that the Men's Club did recommend that this is not the right time for a consultant study. He indicated that it seemed Mr. Hulbert referred to changing the clubhouse facility and noted as members of the Men's Club, while the clubhouse could be improved a little bit, that's not the reason patrons come to Braemar. He stated that what they want is a golf course that has the best golfing experience in the area for an appropriate price. This includes having a driving range with grass on it that is safe to hit balls on, level fairways, etc. Mr. Windham noted that back in September they went to Mr. Anderson with a list of eight items they felt needed to be changed and/or fixed to which Mr. Anderson took action on all eight items. He noted they feel Mr. Anderson is a person of action that will do things that are needed. He stated that if the Park Board wants to spend money at Braemar they should put it towards implementing the strategic plan and sooner rather than later would be their thought. Mr. Windham commented that in regards to making the clubhouse a place to gather for non - golfing events he doesn't see it as a good thing. They don't think the clubhouse should be competing with other restaurants and entertainment venues that are for profit entities. He noted there are plenty of those around if a person wants to have a beer and watch a Twins game. He commented they enjoy watching the game when they are finished with golf but they don't want the clubhouse filled with non -golf people as well. They don't think expanding the clubhouse significantly would have a big bearing on the number of people that play golf there but rather have a quality golf facility so that the golfing experience is better than the golf courses that compete with Braemar. Bob Teese, 6304 Red Fox Lane, informed the Park Board there is a solid base of talent between employees and patrons to get ideas and suggestions from. He indicated that he doesn't know of one consultant that's ever come in and done anything but interview people to get the best ideas and then play back those ideas along with some other ones they may have learned at another golf course and put that as part of their summary and recommendation. Mr. Teese commented that they already have a wish list at Braemar 11 and they've already taken some action and Mr. Anderson will have a plan in place by spring. He noted they don't need any more help right now and if the Park Board has $15,000 they want to spend then fix the dome because it is a money machine. Mr. Teese pointed out that Mr. Windham is the sounding board for over 300 people who are in the Men's Club for what they want. He stated they want to go out with camaraderie, friendship, a good round of golf with friends and significant others and when they finish maybe have a beer at the clubhouse. Mr. Windham noted that as members of the Men's Club they would like to form a closer working relationship with the Park Board and in May they will have an event they would like the Park Board members to attend to interact with many of the players that play there as well as have a good time. Mr. Hulbert stated that he thinks what he is hearing is the Park Board would like to get a little more information and talk about it again at their next meeting. Mr. Fronek asked Mr. Keprios if they've ever done a long range plan at Braemar like they have done at Countryside Park, Pamela Park, etc. Mr. Keprios replied they do have a long range plan that doesn't show up in the five year capital plan because there is no money. He indicated there is a long -term wish list that has been on the radar screen for some time which the business plan will outline. He noted that he would be happy to bring that to the next meeting and noted that it addresses the expansion of the driving range, possibly turn the executive course into a par three course, improvements to the new nine to make it more playable, golf dome building and more. Mr. Keprios indicated that he would be happy to bring forward both the short term and long term plan in addition to looking at some other local consultants if that's the direction the Park Board would like him to go. Ms. Jones asked is that the same as the strategic plan to which Mr. Keprios replied yes. Mr. Keprios again stated that the reason they are not seeing it now is because there are no dollars to do it. He stated that he thinks a consultant will tell you the same thing that these folks already know need to be done down the road. Mr. Keprios indicated that when you are talking about the finer day -to -day details of procedural efficiencies you are getting a little more into management which he would prefer the Park Board not do. He noted that Mr. Anderson is already focused on and has made some changes. Mr. Lough stated that he hopes they are sensitive to not getting into the day to day month to month management of an operation like Braemar. He indicated as a Park Board member what he would like to see when you take on some of these activities that you can establish measurement systems as to how these translate into revenue and how that translates into costs savings and how that actually in some way or another enhances the long -term survivability of Braemar as an asset to the city and to the citizens of Edina. Mr. Keprios pointed out that he thinks the goals are the same and that we are all on the same team and want the same thing. He noted that he thinks his staff and the patrons of 7 Braemar are hungry to prove they've got the answers and how to get there is going to be the key. Mr. Dummer indicated that it seems that everyone has brought up the same points of trying to keep the idea of saving money as well as getting ideas implemented as much as possible. He noted that he is a little confused they could either go about bringing in an outside consultant to look at this to tell us answers that we seemingly already have or go with staff and put the money towards fixing the golf dome or something. He stated that he thinks they should go down the road of killing two birds with one stone. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that next month he will be happy to provide them with a summary of what the short and long term plans are for Braemar. Mr. Fronek indicated that if the business plan is going to in a sense duplicate what one of these consultants does then as a Park Board he would love to see that business plan in a more comprehensive sense. He noted then as Mr. Anderson mentioned in July or August if their recommendation is not to have a consultant but rather have it done internally then they have something to go back to as Mr. Lough previously said with some type of a measurement system. Mr. Keprios stated that if the mindset of the Park Board is to go down the road of a consultant he can do that and that's fine; however, he would respectfully ask not to go back and do more research and work only to find out later that you already have your mind set on this course of action. Mr. Hulbert commented that he is still of the mind that he would like to find out if there is a local company and see what they would offer and bring it up at the next meeting. He noted -if Park Board members want to see what has been put together so far by staff as far as the business plan then we need to see what has been done so far because that will give them something to look at between now and the next meeting. He added that he doesn't think it takes that much time to see if there is something local and what they have to say. B. Veteran's Memorial Resolution — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board he would like a recommendation for the Veteran's Memorial Resolution for City Council's approval. He pointed out that the resolution is something that is required by law in order to spend dollars on a veteran's memorial. He noted that basically they need to commit to the amount of money they intend to spend on the project. He stated that the estimated costs to design and build the memorial shall not exceed $400,000. He added that the $400,000 is to be inclusive all soft costs, engineering fees, architect fees etc. Mr. Keprios indicated that if they find at the end of the day that it's going to cost slightly more the City Council does have the authority to change that by a new resolution. Mr. Meyer indicated that it's his understanding that the balance of those funds will come from donations. Mr. Keprios replied that is correct and added that the City Council has approved the Park Board's recommendation of $30,000 seed money through the capital improvement plan. He noted that they will not spend any of that until all of the legal language is in place. Mr. Meyer asked if they should clarify that in the resolution that the sources for funds are that the city has committed the seed funding of $30,000 and that the balance is to come from donations. Mr. Keprios replied that he asked that question of legal counsel and was told it's not necessary. He noted that he thinks it's a good idea and they certainly could add the language that the remaining funds will be from donated sources. He stated, however if the committee fails to raise dollars the City Council still have the option to eventually complete it with tax dollars, the intent is to do it with donated dollars but it doesn't lock them into it. Mr. Meyer stated that he thinks they have to do it one way or another if he is going to vote for the resolution. He indicated that he thinks it needs to be clarified up front and if that changes it also should be clarified. Mr. Meyer explained that he is uncomfortable having it pass with the potential that if they can't raise the funds the city is going to bill the taxpayer. Mr. Keprios responded you could add the language that it would all be donated dollars. Mr. Lough asked if the money can't be raised then what alternatives does the city have, can money already raised be returned if they decide not to complete it. He stated that raises a whole series of questions that "intent" does not answer. Mr. Keprios replied that the language that will be on all requests for donations will state that donations will go through the Edina Community Foundation and if the project doesn't go through the funds will remain in that account to continue something eventually for a Veteran's Memorial whether it be next year, five years, 50 years, etc. The donation will not be returned and will not be used for any other purpose than a Veteran's Memorial. Mr. Lough asked is there a time frame to which Mr. Keprios replied the Veteran's Committee goal is to have it completed with an opening on Veteran's Day, November 11, 2012. Mr. Keprios stated that he can add the language that all funds besides the $30,000 seed money will come from donations to be raised by the committee. Mr. Meyer asked if they are going to allow construction to begin before all of the funding is raised. Mr. Keprios replied no, they will not put a shovel into the ground until all of the funds are in place. Joseph Hulbert MOVED TO ADOPT THE RESOLUTION WITH AN AMENDMENT THAT THE COST TO THE CITY SHOULD NOT EXCEED $30,000 THE BALANCE SHALL BE RAISED THROUGH PRIVATE DONATIONS. Todd Fronek SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. C. Veterans Memorial Ordinance — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the ordinance is also a requirement by law stating that the city has the intent to build it, equip it and maintain it at the specific location. It clearly states that it's not going to be left in the hands of volunteers to maintain, it's the city's responsibility. Mr. Meyer asked if we have a sense of what the maintenance will be. He also asked what type of life expectancy of the memorial amenities they are looking at. Mr. Keprios replied the committee has discussed those issues and their plan is for it to be very sustainable yet durable. He noted that the maintenance will very minimal with the exception if they decide they want to plow the snow in the winter so people can visit it during winter months. Todd Fronek MOVED APPROVAL OF THE ORDINANCE. Jennifer Kenney SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. D. Community Foundation Agreement — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that it's staff recommendation and the recommendation of the chairman of the Veterans Committee that they enter into this agreement with the Edina Community Foundation. He pointed out that one of the key benefits is that the money handling will take place from someone other than the Finance Department. Secondly, if money is donated to the city it is public information so if someone wanted to donate anonymously this way they could. Mr. Fronek asked if there is going to be any permanent recognition of donors at the site. Mr. Keprios replied that the committee is very sensitive to not give too much recognition to the donors because the main focus and purpose is to honor veterans. He indicated that the committee felt very strongly that those who make smaller donations should not have their name etched in stone forever. He noted they want to appropriately recognize the larger donors who want the recognition, which will be part of the marketing and fundraising strategy because the larger donors are going to want something in return. Todd Fronek MOVED APPROVAL OF THE AGREEMENT. Jennifer Kenney SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. E. City Code Amendment — ATV /Snowmobile & Motorized Water Craft use on Public Prove — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that he received a request from a parent coach of the Nordic ski team from Edina High School for permission to groom a Nordic ski trail on city property by the High School campus. He indicated that when he asked how they were planning to groom the trail he was informed with the use of a snowmobile. Mr. Keprios pointed out that legally they can't do it because it's against City Code and the only way he could be granted permission is if they were to change the City Code. Therefore he is recommending that the Park Board approve the concept to recommend a City Code amendment that grants the City Manager or Park Director the authority to grant permission to authorized City personnel or agents of the City (approved by the Park Director or City Manager) to operate ATVs, snowmobiles and motorized craft on City -owned park property including the City's lakes and ponds. He noted that permission may only be granted for maintenance, training and safety purposes. In no case will permission be granted for recreational uses. He noted that he recently found out that they are already covered under the ordinance for the watercraft part of it. Mr. Keprios handed out to the Park Board the proposed amendment from the City attorney which states specifically what is in his staff report. He pointed out that it does grant the school district the authority to grant permission on school property to use a snowmobile which does need to be an amendment to the city code to allow it to happen. Ms. Jones asked if this would apply to the Nine Mile Creek trail since it would be county property within the city. Mr. Keprios replied they would have to discuss that with Nine Mile because it would have to be in part of the trail agreement before the City 10 grants easements to Three Rivers Park District. It would be something they would need to negotiate with Three Rivers Park District to become part of the agreement. Ms. Jones indicated that since it is the middle of ski team season would it be possible to ask the City Council to waive the second reading. Mr. Keprios replied he thinks that would be a good recommendation on the Park Board's part. He noted that he is asking the Park Board to recommend the document created by their attorney to adopt a Resolution to amend Section 11435.03 subd. 2 of the City Code as written. Mr. Meyer asked for clarification what does permission entails and will you draft a letter stating they have permission to do the trail grooming for this season. Mr. Keprios replied that these permissions are always done in writing and in this case we would use a formal Park Permit which is also copied to the Police Department and Park Maintenance Department. Randy Meyer MOVED TO APPROVE. Ellen Jones SECONDED THE MOTION. WITH THE RECOMMENDATION TO WAIVE THE SECOND READING AS WELL. FRIENDLY AMENDMENT ACCEPTED. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. III. UPDATES FROM STAFF A. Golf Dome - Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that with all the record breaking snow we received, unfortunately the golf dome collapsed. He noted that it will be repaired as soon as possible and we expect to have it up and operational by Thursday or Friday at the latest. Mr. Meyer asked is there insurance coverage for that to which Mr. Keprios replied they have a $10,000 deductible on their insurance and are hoping to fix it for less than $8,000. B. Veterans' Memorial — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that they mailed out 16 requests for proposals and questionnaires to architecture firms and expects to get approximately 8 to 10 returned which will then be reviewed and rated to see how many will qualify for interviews. C. Nine Mile Creek - Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail creek -based route recommendation they sent to the City Council was approved 5 to 0. He noted that after a lengthy discussion they decided that the Park Board's recommendation made the most sense. He congratulated the Park Board and thanked them for their support. Mr. Keprios asked Mr. Meyer to bring the Park Board up to speed on the work session held last night with Three Rivers Park District staff and the School Board of Education. Mr. Meyer informed the Park Board that the School Board was given a presentation and shown where the trail would go through their property now that the creek -based route has been approved by City Council. He indicated there were a few questions and answers and that Three Rivers is going to do some research on what the options are to get students going to school up the hill as part of the overall plan and what costs are 11 associated with that and who will be picking up those costs. He commented that they also wanted to make sure that there would not be any limitations on the development of the football and track field at some future date as well as they want to make sure that the trail is not considered mitigating wetlands. He stated that overall there seems to be support from the School Board and hopes they can get it approved. D. Courtney Fields - Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that earlier when they had the wet heavy snow that the weight on the protective netting at Courtney fields caused tremendous stress on all of the poles that are connected. Unfortunately, one of the poles that had light fixtures on it snapped at the base. He noted that thankfully it missed the building and bleachers but the light fixtures will have to be replaced. Mr. Keprios pointed out that they did have the same engineering firm that designed and rebuilt it a few years ago come out to look at it and see if any other poles will have to come down. He noted that he is sure this will be an insurance issue and we will do our part to ensure that things are back up in place and ready for use before the start of the 2011 baseball season. Mr. Meyer asked Mr. Keprios if he expects in the future they will have to take the netting down. Mr. Keprios replied they were specifically asked to design it so that they wouldn't have to take down the netting and therefore it was engineered to stay up with four inch mesh where snow was supposed to run through it. They do not want to get back into the scenario of taking it down because it's a massive netting system and is a very lengthy process. In addition, the kids want to get on the field immediately when the snow melts. F. Centennial Lakes — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that Centennial Lakes is now open for skating and that the rest of the 11 rinks/hockey rinks and warming houses will open this Friday. 12 Statewide Health Improvement Program Click here to view as web page. January, 2011 In this issue School Initiatives Students at Bloomington's Ridgeview Elementary are active in the classroom . Taste -test reveals healthier choices for Bloomington students . Edina Highlands Elementary encourages walking to school Worksite Initiatives . Edina s Fairview Southdale Hospital employees encouraged to climb for health . Competition gets Richfield City and Schools employees walking Community Initiatives . Final training for the successful I Am Moving I Am Learning program offered in February . Bloomington, Edina and Richfield attendees of Active Living Workshop Series prepared to take action for safe and accessible streets . Interested in starting a community garden at your church, worksite or apartment complex? Continued on following page Help us make our community better for our health! Share this eNewsletter with a friend. Join the SHIP eNewsletter mailing list. Reminder: Check our SHIP website for updates and current events. School Initiatives %11NNsco1-n :, VISION SHIP Students at Bloomington's Ridgeview Elementary are active in the classroom According to Jeff Hopkins, physical education teacher at Bloomington's Ridgeview Elementary School, teachers at the school overcame perceptions about structured school days to increase students' daily physical activity. With help from SHIP, the school is making classrooms a place where children can be more physically active (picture at right). Classroom physical activity will contribute 20 minutes of activity per day toward the 60 minute goal for all students and staff. Strong evidence supports the daily increase can help students achieve strong and healthy bodies and minds, positive self- esteem and academic success. SHIP staff surveyed Ridgeview Elementary School teachers and found they overwhelmingly supported increasing classroom physical activity. Training was then provided to do so. The training included information on the link between physical activity and academics. It also included instruction for using Energizers, JAMin Minutes and stability balls to add classroom activity. Overall, the concept of active classrooms has been well received by the administration and staff at Ridgeview Elementary School. The activities and resources will be incorporated into the staff training manual. As a result, they are well on their way to making healthy living easier. Back Taste -test reveals healthier choices for Bloomington students Bloomington Schools is helping students make healthy choices for lunch by making certain the choices they have are healthy — and taste good. Over three hundred students from Oak Grove Middle and Kennedy High Schools tested 15 healthy foods and rated them for taste and cost (picture next page). The healthy foods met IOM (Institute of Medicine) nutrition standards. The students' affordable favorites will replace not -so- Healthcare Initiatives . VJelcome, Marie Sherwood! Bloomington Natural Care Center and Bloomington Lake Clinic pilot treatment guidelines For Your Information Healthy, Hunger -Free Kids Act of 2010 impacts schools and early childhood nutrition . How tobacco smcke causes disease . Grant funding opportunity for connecting children to gardens and sustainable agriculture from Annie's . Hennepin County Libraries offer free master gardener classes in 2011 healthy choices currently available from the a la carte lunch line. SHIP intern, Jill Verchota, developed the evaluation and taste - testing protocol used by the schools. What did they choose? Students tested canned fruit in juice, cereal bars, granola bars, 100 calorie pack snacks, popcorn and multi -grain puffed snacks. Their favorites, based on taste and cost, include Cinnamon Toast Crunch Milk 'n Cereal Bars (General Mills), Nutri -Grain Cereal Bars (Kellogg's), Oats 'n Honey Granola Bar (Nature Valley), string cheese and kettle corn popcorn. Bloomington School District Food Service is replacing four of the not -so- healthy a la carte foods with these this year. They are working toward ensuring all products meet the IOM standards in the coming years. Back Edina Highlands Elementary encourages walking to school Have you noticed Edina students walking to school — even as the snow piles get higher? At Highlands Elementary in Edina, parents and staff are encouraging students to walk to school all year long by promoting several walk -to- school days. Snow on December 9 didn't deter parents or children from walking to school for their first planned walk -to- school day. The children wore safety vests donated by SHIP, and Highlands staff members passed out "I Walked" stickers, also donated by SHIP, when they arrived to school. The next walk -to- school day takes place in January. Why encourage walking to school? When kids walk to school, traffic and environmental stress decrease, kids get the exercise they need and the neighborhood springs to life. The benefits of walking to school also follow kids into the classroom. Kids who get enough exercise are more alert, do better in school and have more chances for meaningful social interaction. It's a simple act with a big return — especially when it comes to health. Back Worksite Initiatives Edina's Fairview Southdale Hospital employees encouraged to climb for health Edina's Fairview Hospital is making it easy, fun and rewarding for employees to get more physical activity at work with a special twist to SHIP's Energize of Work effort. Employees are challenged to climb the equivalent of the IDS Tower by using the stairs while at work as much as possible. There is an added benefit to this twist. Walking upstairs burns double the calories as walking at a moderate pace on a firm, flat surface. SHIP staff created routes and maps for employees to follow and document progress. Climbing 55 flights of stairs will get employees to the top of the IDS tower. Those who really want to challenge themselves can reach the top of Pikes Peak by completing the climb to the top of the IDS tower 66 times! Employees are also encouraged to take other "walks" in the course of their work day with nature inspired routes. The Superior Hiking Trail is a .3 mile round trip trek from the cafeteria to the Medical Center east elevator. SHIP makes it easy for employers to "Energize" the workplace. If you are interested, the Energize of Work contact person is Sueling Schardin: 952 - 563 -8915 or sschardin @ci.bloomington.mn.us �c< Competition gets Richfield City and Schools employees walking What would make a person walk from here to Duluth and back? For Richfield High School staff member, Vickie McInnis, it was the competition and award of a $25 Q.Cumbers gift card. Vickie won first place in the 3 -week competition for Richfield Public Schools staff members by logging 728,640 steps or approximately 364 miles — more than the distance to Duluth and back! The City of Richfield and Richfield Public Schools jointly received a SHIP mini -grant to increase employees' physical activity and promote healthy living. The walking competition was one of their mini -grant strategies. Nearly one hundred and eighty Richfield City and Public Schools staff members participated in the competition averaging 102 -114 miles per walker. Excitement and positive feedback from the event was an indication of its overall success. In terms of the future, STEM School participants responded in a survey they are highly motivated to make healthy changes in their lives and over half want formal walking groups at their worksite. Competitions such as this are a fun way to get people into the habit of making walking for health and well -being a regular part of daily living. Both the City of Richfield and Richfield Public Schools are taking additional strides to increase opportunities for their employees to be physically active through walking meeting policies and procedures (the City) and policies that increase employee access to fitness facilities on their campus' (Richfield Public Schools). Their efforts are "working well." Back Community Initiatives Final training for the successful I Am Moving I Am Learning program offered in February Teachers are reporting a number of successes by using the IMIL (I am Moving I am Learning) curriculum from training offered by SHIP. This training teaches preschool and childcare teachers to enhance the important mind -body connection by integrating movement with existing curriculum. In one case, a preschooler who was speech impaired participated daily in movement with a favorite IMIL song. A few weeks later, his first intelligible words were from the song. Teachers are also reporting that children are making new friends and becoming better leaders as a result of using IMIL. SHIP will be offering the final IMIL workshop for Bloomington, Edina and Richfield childcare center and preschool staffs on February 12, 2011, from 8:15 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. More information is available here. Back Bloomington, Edina and Richfield attendees of Active Living Workshop Series prepared to take action for safe and accessible streets As a result of the second Active Living Workshop on December 1, Bloomington, Edina and Richfield are moving forward to pursue Complete Streets policies. Complete Streets means that our streets are planned to be safe and accessible for all users — pedestrians, transit riders, bicyclists and drivers — regardless of age or ability. Twenty -three representatives from the three cities attended the workshop facilitated by experts from Blue Cross Blue Shield Minnesota. The workshop fostered connections between city staffs and others to develop action plans in each city for future projects. Jack Broz, Transportation Group Leader from the Howard R. Green Company energized the group with a Complete Streets presentation that led participants to understand how a Complete f. Streets -like policy can impact a community. Participants identified opportunities to apply active living policies and projects, specified what is needed to support Complete Streets policies, and prepared for policy change and implementation. The Two -Part Active Living Workshop Series was sponsored by the Bloomington, Edina and Richfield Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP) with additional support from Active Living Hennepin Communities. Back Interested in starting a community garden at your church, worksite or apartment complex? Coming soon: funding opportunities will be available for churches, worksites and residential housing units to start-up a community garden on -site. If you are interested in learning more, please contact Sueling Schardin at 952 - 563 -8915 or sschardin @ci.bloomington.mn.us. Back Healthcare Initiatives Welcome, Marie Sherwoodl We would like to welcome Marie Sherwood to our SHIP team. Marie joins us as our new healthcare liaison and brings experience with health and wellness work in the healthcare industry. She will be working with local clinics to help them implement the Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI) Guidelines for obesity and chronic disease prevention. Marie is a health educator and comes to us from the Minneapolis Clinic of Neurology, ltd. There, she worked as the director of the Back to Fitness Center, a medical fitness program, for the past nineteen years. Back Bloomington Natural Care Center and Bloomington Lake Clinic pilot treatment guidelines The Bloomington Natural Care Center successfully piloted implementation of the obesity and chronic disease prevention guidelines. They are assessing and discussing patients' risks regarding their BMI (Body Mass Index) and providing information and guidance on changing eating and physical activity behaviors. Through the pilot, they have streamlined their systems and procedures. They are now ready to incorporate this as a standard of practice. Congratulations to BNCC in adding this to their treatment protocols! Bloomington Lake Clinic is also well on their way to incorporating the prevention guidelines into their standard of care. Two physicians and their nursing staff are wrapping up a two month pilot using new systems and patient education strategies. From the pilot, they will identify additional ways to improve on their care before rolling it out with all providers. We are working with 3 more clinics in addition to these providing toolkits, clinic tools, patient education materials and referral resources. We would like to help more. If you are interested or know of a clinic that might be interested, please contact Marie Sherwood at 952 - 563 -8928 or msherwood @ci.bloomington.mn.us. We would be happy to share information about how the SHIP healthcare initiative works. For Your Information Healthy, Hunger -Free Kids Act of 2010 impacts schools and early childhood nutrition On December 13, 2010, President Obama signed the Healthy, Hunger -Free Kids Act, also known as the Child Nutrition Reauthorization Bill, into law. The 2010 law 1) improves nutrition and focuses on reducing childhood obesity, 2) increases access to school meals and 3) increases program monitoring and integrity. The new law provides $4.5 billion over the next ten years to support provisions impacting child nutrition through schools, childcare facilities and the Women, Infant and Children program. This includes giving the USDA authority to set nutritional standards for all foods regularly sold in schools during the school day. Examples of these would be food sold from vending machines, the A la carte lunch lines and school stores. The law provides additional funding to schools that meet updated nutritional standards for federally- subsidized lunches. Link to more information about the Healthy, Hunger -Free Kids Act here: . Child Nutrition Fact Sheet . Sample Menu before and after comparison of the new law and current law . Child Nutrition Reauthorization: Putting the Action into Action Webinar Powerpoint . Child Nutrition Reauthorization highlights comparing the new law to the current law Back How tobacco smoke causes disease A report just released by the Surgeon General (12/9/10), How Tobacco Smoke Causes Disease (12/9/10), describes evidence that exposure to tobacco smoke — even occasional smoking or secondhand smoke — causes immediate damage to your body that can lead to serious illness or death. In 2006, the Surgeon General reported scientific evidence was sufficient to conclude that there is no risk -free level of exposure to secondhand smoke. This report provides a more detailed review of the mechanisms that validate that conclusion. The findings emphasize the importance of helping smokers quit as early in life as possible. Find the report here. Back Grant funding opportunity for connecting children to gardens and sustainable agriculture from Annie's Annie's offers a limited number of small grants for community gardens, school gardens and other educational programs that connect children directly to gardening. These funds can be used to buy gardening tools, seeds or other needed supplies. Only schools and non -profit organizations located within the United States are eligible. Annie's does not make grants or donations to individuals, athletic teams or events, or health fairs. Get more information and apply for a grant here. Back Hennepin County Libraries offer free master gardener classes in 2011 Interested in growing fresh fruits and vegetables in containers or on your property? Hennepin County Libraries offers the following presentations in collaboration with the University of Minnesota Extension Service and Hennepin County. Master Gardeners. VETERANS MEMORIAL COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES FROM JULY 23, 2010 The following are Minutes from the second meeting of the Veterans Memorial Committee held in the Mayor's Conference Room at City Hall on Friday, July 23, 2010 at 7:30 am Volunteers in attendance: Chairman Mike Goergen, Barbara Bender, Frank Cardarelle, Jason Christiaansen, Justin Kieffer, Bob Kojetin, Herbert Lefler, John Lonsbury, Robert Reed, Marshall Schwartz Volunteers unable to attend: Jack Abrahamson Guests: Dennis W. Schulstad, Brigadier General, USAF, Retired and State Chair Emeritus, ESGR (Employer Support of the Guard & Reserve) Staff in attendance: John Keprios, Edina Park and Recreation Department Director Janet Canton, Edina Park and Recreation Office Coordinator I. Dennis W. Schulstad, Brizadier General, USAF, Retired and State Chair Emeritus, ESGR (Employer Support of the Guard & Reserve) — Brigadier General Dennis Schulstad, USAF Retired and State Chair Emeritus ESGR, has been very active in various groups and projects that have involved veterans. He shared with the committee some of the highlights as well as the pros and cons on some of the projects he has worked on in the past. Mr. Schulstad indicated that he worked on what is now the "Veterans Tribute Wall" located at the University of Minnesota TCF Bank Stadium. The committee of the project consisted of a group of top leaders of every veteran group in Minnesota. He noted that, because the new stadium could not be named "Memorial Stadium" (in honor of WWI Veterans) like the old stadium, they decided to build the Veterans Tribute Wall which contains both the American Flag and the Minnesota flag; there is also room for other flags. He pointed out that the wording they used wasn't just for WWI vets (like the old stadium) but included all veterans past, current and future. Mr. Schulstad explained that this group was also taxed with raising the money to build it and also to work with the architects on the design. He noted they needed to raise approximately $500,000 and they ended up raising $680,000. He pointed out that to start they looked at selling bricks or selling names on a plaque or something like that, unfortunately they could not do that because they would have been competing with a lot of other things going on at that time. He indicated that what he ended up doing was he hit up 15 people and was able to get the money. Two of them were corporate and the rest were private donations, so it was very successful doing it that way. Mr. Schulstad indicated that another project he worked on was making a statue of George Mikan at the Target Center and estimated it to cost approximately $75,000 to $100,000 to do. He stated that he contacted several people and was able get ten $10,000 grants. He noted that since it was ti so quick and easy to do they decided to continue to raise more money. He explained that they ended up working a Juvenile Diabetes Foundation called Maxi Fund and anything they raised above their cost they would give to the Maxi Fund Foundation. They were able to raise $600,000. He pointed out that the reason they did this is because with the initial money they raised for the statue was not tax deductible; however, once they decided to continue to raise money if they tied it in with a charitable 501C3 foundation the donations they raised would be tax deductible. He stressed that it's very important to establish some type of method to make all donations tax deductible. Mr. Schulstad indicated that the committee will need to decide if they want to go after a few big sponsors to help pay for it or go after a lot of $100 donations to pay for it. He noted that you can do it either way and there's a very good case that can be made either way. However, it's a very important decision that needs to be made early on. Mr. Schulstad stated that the third group he worked with was the "Minnesota Military Appreciation Fund ". He noted that it is an organization that raises money to give to every man or woman from Minnesota who has served either active duty or been on the reserves who have served in combat after 911, a check for $500. If they are wounded they can get up to $20,000. He added that the most important thing is they get a letter of appreciation from the people of Minnesota, not from the taxpayers, the government or the military, but the people of Minnesota making a donation thanking them for their service. Mr. Schulstad pointed out that they wanted to do something for their major donors and to recognize the entire effort so they went to Fort Snelling where they have plaques on the wall. He noted that the plaque talks about all of the sacrifices made by the men and women who have served in the military and then lists all of the different supporters all the way from one million dollars down to $10,000. He commented that so far they have raised 11 million dollars and are the only state in America to do this. Mr. Schulstad explained that this is a 501C3 and they have gone out to individuals to raise money but they have also had four major fundraisers to raise money for it so that is also something to think about. Mr. Schulstad indicated that he has been involved in a lot of things along the way. He noted that in Crystal they have a beautiful Veterans Memorial in their cemetery. He explained there are five different granite walls overlooking a lake that has an atrium in front of it. He stated that is where the names are listed and he believes for $300 or $400 you can have your name and recognize someone who was a war veteran listed. Mr. Keprios asked Mr. Schulstad where he would suggest they start to look for sources for grants. Mr. Schulstad replied one place to look at is there are several pretty good size defense contractors in Minnesota. He noted that a good place to start would be with what is called "Minnesota Defense Alliance ". He noted that another thing to do is just talk to plain personal contacts. Mr. Schulstad commented that how to motivate people to be financially involved is an interesting process. A lot of people want to know what they will get if they donate money such as their name in big letters on a plaque. To some people that means a tremendous amount and to other people they don't care if their name is mentioned. He added that some people won't even make a donation if their name isn't mentioned and for a lot of corporate donations it's very important that their name is mentioned. CMr. Keprios asked Mr. Schulstad if he would suggest that they have a plan in place first before they start knocking on doors to which he replied yes. v Mr. Keprios asked Mr. Schulstad for his thoughts on statues and should it be neutral on gender, should they have an eagle instead, should they have all branches of the military represented, etc. Mr. Schulstad replied that those are all of the same discussions they had. He pointed out that he doesn't suggest they inscribe names because someone is always going to get left off and it's very difficult to add later. However, if names are used do not put them in alphabetical order because it will be obvious if you forget someone and add them later. Mr. Schulstad advised the committee that whatever it is they decide to do that they need to keep it simple. There is no right or wrong answer. However, he really thinks it's important that this is from the community. Mr. Keprios asked Mr. Schulstad if he thinks there are any elements in the design that they should pay attention to, what's really important. Mr. Schulstad replied again to keep it simple and suggests not listing any names. Secondly, he thinks it's very important to have the American flag. Mr. Keprios asked if they were to use three flags which three would he suggest. Mr. Schulstad responded that if he were to do the U of M one again he would put all of the flags in a cluster with the American flag taller and two other flag poles and those could be used for POW's, City of Edina, or if you wanted the State of Minnesota. Have a cluster of flags with the American flag in the middle as the largest one; he pointed out that if you leave the flags up they are supposed to have 24 hour lighting on them which is a big cost item. Mr. Lonsbury asked about ongoing maintenance because he is worried what are they going to do 50 years from now. How do they fund or provide for the future and hand off from building to maintenance. Mr. Schulstad replied that at the U of M there is extra money sitting at the University Foundation that is there for improvements, flag replacements, repairs, etc. He stated that for the George Mikan statue they didn't do anything extra and that is a concern as to what will happen when the statue needs cleaning as well as who owns it. If they decide to redo the place will it be moved or put in the junk because they really don'tknow who owns it. These are a couple of mistakes they made. Mr. Lonsbury indicated that he is thinking if they do any engravings or anything like that they are committing future generations to add or keep up all of the rest of it. Mr. Schulstad commented that money should be set aside because chances are a mistake will be made or there may be vandalism so you need to think about repairing vandalism. Mr. Keprios indicated that one of the things they are looking at is putting the names of those killed in action who were Edina residents on the monument. He asked Mr. Schulstad if it would be his suggestion to not do that or to at least leave space to add names that were missed. Mr. Schulstad noted that is exactly the reason you would put names randomly and not in alphabetical order so that adding a name is not too difficult and will not look like one was forgotten in the process. Unfortunately, there will probably be another war so there will be additional names added later. Mr. Schulstad pointed out that if they decide to have names listed of those killed in action they need to have very definite requirements because you do not want the committee deciding whether or not certain people should be included or not included. It needs to be black and white as to what is considered killed in action. It's a difficult thing to do so you need to make it as simple as you possibly can. Ms. Bender noted that she likes the idea of being simple and just keeping specific names to a minimum or having them perhaps in a small enclosure in a book like at the Vietnam Veterans Memorial at the State Capital they do have the wall but they also have an enclosed book and maybe the committee would like to do something like that for names rather than having them etched in stone. Mr. Schulstad stated that he would personally discourage the committee from e listing names because it's very difficult to do. If you do decide to do it, it's important to establish the criteria before you even begin. Mr. Schulstad pointed out that a lot of people are not going to give you money unless they know it's going to happen. He noted that the majority of people will always ask "who else has given ?" It was noted that it's assumed that the memorial is going to belong to the City of Edina and is owned by the City of Edina. The city will pay for the lights and will keep it maintained. Ms. Bender asked Mr. Schulstad if he has ever seen documents that were dedicated to the Veterans but was also with the theme of freedom. She noted that sometimes she thinks we don't really appreciate just how much freedom we have. Mr. Schulstad replied that's a great idea because that's what it's all about. It was asked of Mr. Schulstad that in all of the projects he has worked on did he ever feel they wasted too much time focusing on something minute. Mr. Schulstad responded he would have spent more time with the sculptor instead of just saying we trust you. Secondly, having lack of ownership there needs to be some kind of contract as to who owns it. Mr. Cardarelle noted that his concern is he wants it to be an everlasting memorial for at least the next 200 years. He wants to see it continue to honor the veterans all the way from the Revolutionary War all the way to 100 years from now. He commented that he thinks the actual design needs to be something for the future as much as the past. II. STANDING COMNUTTEES It was noted that they are'still looking for someone to volunteer to be the chair or co -chair of the Fundraising Committee. Mr. Lonsbury stated that he thinks the Marketing Committee should also include Community Relations because he thinks there is going to be a lot of politics regarding this and they should be thinking about that up front. Mr. Lonsbury noted that he also thinks the Fundraising Chair could also be the Treasurer and that the two could be combined. Mr. Schwartz stated that he would strongly recommend that Bob Benson be included as a committee member. Mr. Keprios indicated that it was his understanding that he wanted to be a project volunteer and not a committee member. Mr. Keprios indicated they would welcome Mr. Benson if he wants to be a committee member. He noted that they received a few applications where people wanted to help out but couldn't commit to actually being on the committee. III. SITE SELECTION Mr. Reed indicated that before they can begin to get an idea they really need to zero in on a site. Mr. Goergen stated that they are relying a lot on staff and right now staff's forerunner is Utley Park. Mr. Keprios stated that they need to have a comprehensive process for site selection and show that we have exercised proper due diligence. He noted in his view he thinks there are three sites they should consider: Utley Park, Centennial Lakes Park and Arneson Acres. Mr. Kojetin suggested adding Williams Park as a consideration. Mr. Schwartz noted that he was at the State Capital this past week and the thing that struck him was there was no shade. He commented that he thinks there is a real dignity at Utley Park because it already has big trees that would take years to try and grow and with the shade it encourages people to stay and to think. Mr. Lonsbury stated that he thinks they first need to figure out what their criteria are for selecting a site. Are they looking for more of a park location or are they looking with more of a reflecting area. Do they want to have lots of sun, be near water, etc. Mr. Goergen indicated when this originally came about in January as a proposal to the Park Board they wanted a dignified memorial to the veterans and possibly include those who were killed in action. They wanted it to be a place for reflection and that's when they started thinking it would be nice to have water running through it, a nice wooded area and perhaps putting in some benches. He added that one other thing he had talked about is it would be nice if it could serve as a centerpiece or backdrop for memorial services. Mr. Keprios commented to find a balance between being highly visible, aesthetically pleasing and yet a quiet place for reflection is a tough balance. He added that he does think shade is a nice thing to throw into the mix. Mr. Keprios stated that utility wise he thinks it's wise to have parking close by so that it's easily accessible. Also, something with restrooms would also be important. Mr. Lonsbury commented that it sounds like they are looking for quiet reflection, public ceremonies, parking, visibility, shade and restrooms. Mr. Keprios made the point should they find a site that accommodates the size of the memorial or do they fit the memorial to the size of the site? He noted that which comes first has to be considered. Mr. Cardarelle commented he thinks it's going to be awfully hard to compete with other sites against Utley Park. Mr. Keprios stated that he still likes what Mr. Lonsbury said in that he thinks we ought to consider Arneson Acres and Centennial Lakes and as Mr. Kojetin suggested Williams Park. Mr. Goergen indicated that he thinks all of the committee members should individually look at all four sites and keep in mind the criteria mentioned. He noted it will be put on the agenda for the next meeting and possibly they will be able to make their decision. Mr. Schwartz suggested that at the next meeting they try to establish criteria if they decide they are going to list people who were killed in action. They need to identify who would qualify and who wouldn't because it wouldn't make sense for him to put a lot work and research into it if they decide they are not going to list names. Meeting adjourned. 1� C, VETERANS MEMORIAL COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES FROM AUGUST 20, 2010 The following are Minutes from the second meeting of the Veterans Memorial Committee held in the Mayor's Conference Room at City Hall on Friday, August 20, 2010 at 7:30 am Volunteers in attendance: Chairman Mike Goergen, Frank Cardarelle, Jason Christiaansen, Bob Kojetin, Herbert Lefler, John Lonsbury, Robert Reed, Marshall Schwartz Volunteers unable to attend: Barbara Bender, Bob Benson, Justin Kieffer Staff in attendance: John Keprios, Edina Park and Recreation Department Director Janet Canton, Edina Park and Recreation Office Coordinator I. APPROVAL OF THE JULY 23, 2010 MINUTES John Lonsbury MOVED TO APPROVE THE JULY 23, 2010 VETERANS MEMORIAL COMMITTEE MINUTES. Herbert Lefler SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. H. SITE SELECTION Mr. Goergen commented that he hopes everyone had a chance to look at the four sites that met the criteria that were discussed at the last meeting: Arneson Acres, Centennial Lakes, Utley Park and Williams Park. He explained that after everyone has shared their opinions both pro and con they will take a vote based on a number system where each park will be ranked 1", 2nd, 3`d and 4`h. Mr. Lefler indicated that he thinks Utley Park is more in the center of things with the Fourth of July Parade, etc. He stated that Centennial Lakes has a much higher visibility in terms of day to day. He noted that Arneson Acres is more relaxing and sort of has the atmosphere that the Vietnam Memorial in Washington has. He also thinks Arneson Acres is a quieter park and would be the place to do something like this. Mr. Kojetin stated that Arneson Acres is a passive park with no scheduled activities and is a quiet park. In addition, it has the historical museum which is a benefit. He pointed out what he thinks they really need to look at is what will these areas look like 100 years from now because this is going to be forever and where is he ideal spot for that goal. He thinks Arneson Acres is the ideal place for that to happen. He stated that Centennial Lakes is an active area and is close to residential areas, therefore it's not a real quiet place. Mr. Kojetin stated that he thinks Utley Park, which currently has a memorial that has been there for 60 years, is an ideal place. It's small so he doesn't think anything else would ever be put there as well as there are trees and a restroom facility. He explained that he had originally thought of Williams Park because it was named after a WWII Edina Veteran, although it's really not an ideal place. He added that he also thinks Utley Park is more attractive and has more visibility than Arneson Acres. Mr. Kojetin stressed that they really need to think about what's going to happen in 50 years, what if they want to expand the memorial, where would they expand it at Utley Park. Mr. Cardarelle indicated that Utley Park has approximately four acres with a long area of creek to use as serenity. He noted that he doesn't think Williams Park has near the suitable area. He noted that he agrees with Mr. Kojetin that Centennial Lakes is. going to lose its significance being in such a commercial area. He commented that he doesn't think Arneson Acres has all of the criteria because it doesn't have the visibility. In addition, it's also lacking the already existing large trees and creek that Utley Park has. He indicated that he doesn't see Utley Park changing much in the next 100 years especially because of the creek. Also, if they were to want to expand the memorial they could take out the tennis courts and basketball courts. Mr. Reed stated that Utley Park had been his number one choice until he really looked at Arneson Acres. He pointed out that Arneson Acres is an open palette and there are a lot of sites that could be used for the memorial. It has a natural amphitheater type situation as well as restrooms and lots of parking. In addition with' the historical museum there they could put up various displays plus have military records of people who served. He noted the negative is the visibility from the road as well as there are homes surrounding the park. Mr. Reed indicated that he thinks Utley Park is a good location and has the visibility but personally thinks parking is limited as well as there are some big trees that are not very good. He commented that he thinks they would have to relocate existing things such as the fire ring and gazebo in order to get the space, scope and size of the memorial. He agrees that Centennial Lakes already has a lot going on and that Williams Park is unacceptable due to its size and it's already the historic site of the Edina Mill. Mr. Christiaansen noted that he has mixed feelings about Arneson Acres. He likes the available space but putting a memorial there it would seem like it's always in someone's backyard with all of the surrounding homes. He commented that pathways would also need to be put in which would be an additional expense. He stated that Utley Park is his first choice although it doesn't have as much flexibility as Arneson Acres. He noted that he also liked the connection to the Fourth of July Parade and thinks that somehow that could be integrated into the design as far as visibility or even have some type of physical connection where people can actually gather. Mr. Christiaansen indicated that he agrees Centennial Lakes is too commercial although it does have good visibility. Mr. Lonsbury informed the committee that he approached each site from a land use perspective. He agrees Williams Park has already been committed to a historical part of Edina and is too small. He noted that Centennial Lakes doesn't seem appropriate to him for what it is they are trying to accomplish. He indicated that with Utley Park, depending on what is done, it could get lost. He pointed out that the Fourth of July Parade is new in his lifetime and there's no guarantee it will always be there. Also, if it is by the creek and depending on its size people are going to drive by and not even know it's there ten years from now. Therefore, they really need to think about where it should be located and how close it should be to 50`h Street. He noted that he doesn't think it's an appropriate scale in size for what they are looking for although it certainly has some amenities. Mr. Lonsbury stated in regards to Arneson Acres there are possibilities however, it's one of Edina's untouched wonderful parks and to commit to build a memorial today will limit what they can do in the future such as adding soccer fields, baseball fields, etc. He stated that each park has its opportunities and its disadvantages. v 4 Mr. Lonsbury stated that he was thinking what if they have a traditional memorial in terms of flag poles, emblems, granite, etc. and in addition see if they could use a part of the Historical Society at Arneson Acres where they could keep names, history, memorabilia, etc., and that way there can be one area that's quiet and reflective as well as have a resource center. Mr. Schwartz indicated that he won't go over Williams Park or Centennial Lakes because he agrees with what everyone has said. He noted that with regards to Arneson Acres they would have to spend a lot of money to create an environment that already exists at Utley Park with the creek, trees, etc. He noted he does like the idea of having a flag with a light on it. He added that they probably couldn't do that at Arneson Acres because of all the homes surrounding it. He commented that as far as security they could put monitors, etc. at Arneson Acres because of the building as well as there are restrooms. He noted that parking is close by but depending where the memorial would be placed it could be quite a walk for the older veterans to get to. Williams Park has the dignity but is too small whereas Utley Park has the water, dignity, etc., but also seems to fit the character and personality of what it is they are looking for. Mr. Goergen indicated that he is torn between Arneson Acres and Utley Park. Williams Park is too small and he agrees that Centennial Lakes is too busy and commercialized. He noted that Arneson Acres has a lot of positives but one negative is visibility where he feels there is much more visibility at Utley Park. In addition, he likes the serene space for reflection especially if it's situated correctly with the creek in the background. Also there is parking available and if more is needed there is another parking lot across the street at Wooddale Park. He noted that he thinks Utley Park has a better combination of the elements they established, with Arneson Acres being a close second. Mr. Keprios stated that it's pretty clear they are down to two choices: Arneson Acres and Utley Park. He indicated that he likes Mr. Lonsbury's idea of having some type of exhibit or showcase at the Historical Society that honors the veterans and keeps a computer file to keep all the data on the veterans from Edina. The vote was taken: Arneson Acres = I' Place (1 vote); 2nd Place (6 votes) Centennial Lakes = 3rd Place (5 votes); 4`h Place (3 votes) Utley Park = I" Place (7 votes); 2nd Place (1 vote) Williams Park = 3`d Place (3 votes); 4`h Place (5 votes) Utley Park was voted as the location for the Veteran's Memorial. Mr. Cardarelle indicated that he will take topography of the park so that the committee can see the location of the trees, buildings, parking lot, etc. Mr. Cardarelle commented as Mr. Lonsbury stated he thinks the committee should also keep in mind the Historical Society as a secondary place to keep records. Mr. Lonsbury stated that another thought he had was that could also be a place where they can list their recognition of donors so that they do not have corporate logos and donors names on the actual memorial, keep it simple. Mr. Lonsbury asked Mr. Keprios if Mr. Cardarelle is going to go out and do topography do they need to have a formal recommendation to the Park Board and then have that run by the City 3 4 Council. Mr. Keprios replied that it is his intent to have the committee's recommendation on the September 14th Park Board agenda for two things. First to go forward with the project and have it located in Utley Park and secondly to approve $30,000 in the 2011 Capital Improvement Plan. John Lonsbury MOVED THAT THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS TO THE PARK BOARD TO APPROVE UTLEY PARK AS THE LOCATION FOR THE VETERANS MEMORIAL AND APPROVE $30,000 IN THE 2011 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN. Mr. Keprios pointed out that the $30,000 is to be used for whatever soft costs are incurred. If there is money left over it will go towards construction, engineering, etc. The purpose of this money is to get the project off the ground so that they don't have to struggle with fundraising right way. It will be a jump start mainly to be used for the architect. Herbert Lefler SECONDED THE MOTION. Mr. Schwartz informed the committee that he spoke with Kevin Rofidal, who was on the Eden Prairie Veterans Committee, and asked him if he could have done something different what would it be. Mr. Rofidal informed him that he would have brought the artist in first because by that time they had the architect and therefore that eliminated some wonderful ideas that the artist may have had. Mr. Lonsbury pointed out that before they get too involved with artists and architects they need to make sure the City Council approves the site. He noted that he doesn't anticipate a great deal of opposition although he does think there will be some concerned neighbors from the Wooddale area. Therefore he thinks it's very important to make sure that they have City Council support and approval of the site before they get too far-into architects, artists, etc. Mr. Keprios stated that the Park Board may direct him to send out notices to everyone within 1,000 feet of the park and invite them to the October meeting to have them give input and then make a final recommendation to the City Council. Mr. Lefler noted that he read an article regarding Target Field and it stated that the reasons it took so long to develop and why there were so many problems is because they focused on the process and financing. What they should have had was a picture to show the public what it was they had in mind or at least the thought and it probably would have gone smoother. He noted that if they had some sort of artist rendering to show the public it may have been more reassuring to the people that what it is they are doing will be tasteful, etc. Mr. Keprios explained that it's a cart and horse thing. He has to present this in his Capital Plan on September 14'' and it will be in competition with all of the other things on the Park and Recreation plate that compete for capital dollars so he needs to have that piece on the agenda. He agrees when they get to the public hearing part they will need to have a picture or rendering so people will have a better idea of what is being proposed. However, they can't get to that point until they have the money to draft a concept drawing. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. III. PERMANENT LISTING OF KILLED IN ACTION (KIA'S) It was noted that Mr. Schwartz is chairing the subcommittee on the research for the KIA and was asked to come up with a formal recommendation of the criteria to propose to the r committee to discuss what the scope is in recognizing those veterans KIA (see attached). \- 4 Mr. Schwartz pointed out that he would like to make one change. In the appendix he would like to add under exceptional situations Edina city employees, teachers, police officers, firemen, etc. Include anyone who is working for the city but does not live in the city and is currently in the Armed Forces. Mr. Keprios stated that he thinks they are assuming everyone is in agreement that they are going to put forever names etched in granite for the KIA's. He noted that before they get into details maybe they should first discuss if that is indeed what the committee wants to do. Mr. Reed indicated that he would vote against having names engraved in the memorial. He added that when he reviewed the previous meetings minutes General Schulstad mentioned repeatedly he would recommend not having names and kept stressing to keep it simple. Mr. Reed stated that he thinks it would make a better situation to have those names available at the Historical Society or someplace else as opposed to etching them in stone. Mr. Goergen noted that his observation was he believes General Schulstad made those statements in context of the memorial at the TCF Stadium. Mr. Lefler suggested that one of the criteria be that it's the veteran's residence when he or she entered the military service until the time of death. He noted this may help with some problems in determining residents. Mr. Lonsbury asked are they honoring those who died while they were serving in the armed forces or are they honoring all veterans and their families who served in the armed forces. Mr. Goergen replied his impression is they are doing both. He noted he envisions one plaque naming KIA and a second one having a general statement honoring everyone who has served during war time and peace time. Mr. Lonsbury stated he thinks it's an important question. He explained that when he went to the Eden Prairie memorial he was very moved; however, as soon as he started looking at the names that were engraved it made it real and at that point he lost everybody but the people who died. He commented that if it's going to be about those who have served and not just those who died they will get a lot more widespread support, more funding, etc. He stated that if they end up honoring however many people the research comes up with he feels the memorial becomes more about them and not about the veterans in general. Mr. Lonsbury commented that he doesn't think they can do both because the focus is going to shift to the people who died. It's something they should talk about because it does change the character and nature of the memorial as soon as names are engraved. Mr. Schwartz indicated that he is putting his recommendation out for approval and that's why he developed the criteria. He noted if someone argues that someone who lived in Edina a little while does not belong on the memorial is it really that bad if the person is listed on two memorials, the person did die for his country. He stated that he doesn't think it has to be an either or, they can develop the memorial so that it doesn't give the feeling that Mr. Lonsbury is talking about. 5 Mr. Goergen pointed out that they are going to have some individual situations that might have to be dealt with on a case by case basis. He noted that when he entered the military there was a place to indicate your home of record and perhaps that should be the basis and starting point for the research. Mr. Lefler stated that he is more comfortable using the Defense Department's home of record as the determining factor if they are going to list KIA because they would be more objective. Mr. Kojetin indicated that he thinks they should include everyone in the memorial and not single out one group from another. He agrees that all of the research that is done can be put in the museum at the Historical Society. Mr. Goergen asked why can't they do both. He noted that if it's done correctly it should be both all inclusive of anyone who served as well as single out those who made the ultimate sacrifice. He commented his personal observation is that is the basis of a veteran's memorial to honor those whose lives ended too soon. It was asked why the research starts with 1888 to which Mr. Schwartz replied because that is when Edina became a community. Mr. Schwartz stated if the committee thinks they need to start before 1888 he can do that. Mr. Schwartz commented that his point was to try to find the things and then validate them through any kind of government document. Mr. Cardarelle suggested they ask the artist or whoever to find a way to design the granite to include both ways. He noted that he thinks all of the veterans should be honored as well as all of those killed in action. Mr. Goergen explained that right now they are at this stage so that Mr. Schwartz can start on his research. Mr. Keprios commented that he is hoping one way or another the KIA will be memorialized somewhere permanently whether it's at the Historical Society or on this memorial. He noted that he would like it in writing so there is no gray area for future park directors to know who does and who does not deserve to be forever put on granite or at the Historical Society. Mr. Keprios pointed out that General Schulstad did say if they do write names to not put them in alphabetical order so that any forgotten names can always be added and it won't look out of place. Mr. Goergen informed the Park Board that Mr. Schwartz is going to have a year or more of research before anything is ever engraved. He noted that he is hoping all of the research will go to the Historical Society as a basis for a more permanent record with further details on the individuals. He commented that all he would like to see listed on the memorial is: name, rank, branch of service and which war. Mr. Lefler made a suggestion that since everyone agrees research should be done to at least look up names at this point. 6 Herbert Lefler MOVED TO RECOMMEND THAT THE COMMITTEE ADOPT THE CRITERIA WITH THE CHANGE THAT RESIDENCY BE DETERMINED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE OR AS LISTED BY THE SERVICE MEMBER. Bob Kojetin SECONDED THE MOTION. Mr. Keprios asked what a Merchant Marine is. Mr. Schwartz replied that they were specific to WWII and were the people that ran the convoys. They took terrible casualties and were very. much in harm's way. He commented that they have a strong advocacy to which some memorials have had bad publicity as a result of not including them. The Merchant Marines were never considered part of the armed forces. Mr. Schwartz explained he, listed them because they were included in the document that Mr. Keprios sentao the -Park Board. He noted that it is a debatable.issue and thathe will go with whatever the committee wants to do. Mr. Reed pointed ;out that what goes along with that is they need to consider the WASP (Women Air Force Service Pilots) who worked for a period of time during WWII. He noted they did the same thing and were never considered part of the armed forces. Mr. Keprios asked if the Merchant Marines are recognized in other memorials to which it was noted typically not and that there have been separate memorials for the Merchant Marines. Mr. Lonsbury suggested that Mr. Schwartz do his research with the criteria that if he finds a Merchant Marine or, WASP that was killed during WWII to bring it to the committee and they can change the criteria if that's what they decide to do. He stated that he would also like to see it pushed back from 1888 just in case Mr. Schwartz is able to find someone from the Edina area prior to that time. Mr. Keprios stated to Mr. Lonsbury that he could probably offer that as a friendly amendment to be voted on. Mr. Lefler stated that would be fine. Mr. Goergen explained that procedurally they are really not approving every point Mr. Schwartz listed but rather are making their own starting point for Mr. Schwartz to proceed. Mr. Keprios stated that they may want to do this by consensus then because . when they are voting on formal criteria the next park director is going to have to live by that. He commented that the committee may find that after Mr. Schwarz does his research they may want to change the criteria but for now have Mr. Schwartz start his research because we know we will be using names it's just a matter of where they will be located.. He commented that if they have the consensus that there needs to be a home of record then1ater go back and set the criteria and have Mr. Schwartz start his research going back as Tar as he can. Mr. Schwartz indicated that if the issue comes up and if anyone were to ask this at a City Council meeting or something that the committee does have the Merchant Marines and WASP in their scope while they are doing their research. He commented that should help in case they encounter issues like Eden Prairie had with the Merchant Marines not being included in their memorial. 7 It was noted there is a motion on the table with a friendly amendment that's been seconded that reads: AT THIS TIME THE CRITERIA USED IN TERMS OF CHECKING RECORDS IS THAT HOME OF RECORD SHOULD BE THE BASIS WITH THE AMENDMENT STATING THAT RESEARCH WILL GO BACK PRIOR TO 1888. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. IV. OTHER A. Fundraising Committee — It was noted that Barb Bender and Bob Kojetin have volunteered to be the co- chairs for the Fundraising Committee. Mr. Kojetin indicated that he has the list of donors who donated money to the 1988 Edina Centennial. He noted that in 1988 $104,000 was donated to the museum. He stated that this can be a starting point and they could go to some of the same corporations and companies. He added that the majority of the donations were $2,000 and the biggest was $25,000. B. Committee Members - Mr. Keprios informed the committee that due to health problems Jack Abrahamson has had to pull out of the committee. He noted that Bob Benson is now a formal member of the committee and he will be co- chairing the Research Committee along with Mr. Schwartz. MEETING ADJOURNED 8 1 yr� i VETERANS MEMORIAL COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES FROM SEPTEMBER 17, 2010 The following are Minutes from the second meeting of the Veterans Memorial Committee held in the Mayor's Conference Room at City Hall on Friday, September 17, 2010 at 7:30 am Volunteers in attendance: Chairman Mike Goergen, Frank Cardarelle, Jason Christiaansen, Bob Kojetin, John Lonsbury, Marshall Schwartz, Barbara Bender, Bob Benson Volunteers unable to attend: Justin Kieffer, Herbert Lefler, Robert Reed Staff in attendance: John Keprios, Edina Park and Recreation Department Director Janet Canton, Edina Park and Recreation Office Coordinator I. APPROVAL OF THE AUGUST 20, 2010 MINUTES Mike Goergen made a change to the Minutes on page 6; it should state "the Committee" and not "the Park Board ". Bob Kojetin MOVED TO APPROVE THE AUGUST 20, 2010 VETERANS MEMORIAL COMMITTEE MINUTES. Bob Benson SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. II. ELEMENTS OF MEMORIAL A. Flag Poles — Mr. Goergen stated that it is staff's recommendation to have three flag poles with lights and that the type of flags will be determined at a later date. Mr. Christiaansen asked about the flag pole that is currently there and stated that he doesn't know how that would fit into what they are proposing or perhaps maybe it could become a temporary flag pole. He noted that it's something to consider how that fits into the scheme of the new design. Mr. Goergen indicated that he thinks they can address that at a later time. Mr. Keprios stated that's a really good point and something they will need to look at. He's not sure what the answer is; maybe they could try to relocate it or possibly the base wouldn't go but the plaque could become a centerpiece. Mr. Keprios also indicated that there are flags directly across the street at Wooddale Park and one in the corner at Utley Park. Frank Cardarelle MOVED THAT THERE BE THREE FLAG POLES WITH LIGHTS WITH THE AMERICAN FLAG IN THE MIDDLE AND THE OTHER TWO WOULD BE REVOLVING. John Lonsbury SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UANIMOUSLY. B. Statue (s) — Mr. Goergen indicated that staff recommends one focal point statute and it will be discussed at a future meeting. Mr. Cardarelle commented that he thinks the artist should show the committee a concept and then the committee can take a vote. Mr. Lonsbury stated that he thinks they need to give the direction to the artist and architect that when they are working on their scheme or concept that they want three flag poles with lights and one art piece focal point. He commented that the committee should state what the concept should be. Mr. Goergen stated that they will be visiting this issue at lot more in the future. John Lonsbury MOVED THAT THERE BE ONE FOCAL POINT. Bob Benson SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. C. Granite Tablet: Numerous General Comments Honoring Service - Mr. Goergen indicated that it's up to the committee to approve whether or not there will be at least two granite tablets; one for KIA and the other with generic statements. John Lonsbury MOVED THAT THE PLAN SHOULD INCLUDE A PERMANENT MARKER MEMORIAL THANKING MEN AND WOMEN FOR THEIR GENERAL SERVICE (He commented that it should be "PERMANENT" as opposed to "GRANITE" so that the architect can proposed what would be most appropriate). Barb Bender SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. D. Military Branch Emblems & Motto of Service — Mr. Goergen indicated that he thinks the committee needs to decide whether or not they want military emblems somewhere on the memorial. Mr. Cardarelle stated that he thinks it should be left up to the artist. John Lonsbury MOVED THAT THE EMBLEMS, AND POSSIBLY THE MOTTOS, OF THE FIVE BRANCHES OF THE MILITARY BE REPRESENTATIVE IN PERMANENT FASHION. Frank Cardarelle SECONDED THE MOTION. Mr. Schwartz brought up the issue of whether or not to include the Merchant Marines in the memorial. He reminded the committee that Eden Prairie had a lot of political problems because initially they didn't include them. Mr. Goergen replied that he thought they discussed this at their last meeting and decided that they would look at those on a case by case basis. Mr. Keprios suggested that possibly this is something that the Historical Society could include in their exhibit to educate people about the Merchant Marines if they end up deciding that is what they are going to do. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. E. Quotes Regarding Veteran Service — Mr. Goergen stated that staff is recommending that there be three or four maximum free - standing quotes having to do with military service. Ms. Bender indicated that she would like to see what the artist and architect have to say about how that could be brought in. She commented that sometimes it seems quotes are just thrown in and therefore feels unless they can really be integrated into the design and central to the memorial she doesn't think they add much. Mr. Goergen and Mr. Kojetin both stated they felt Eden Prairie's memorial was over quoted. 2 John Lonsbury MOVED TO INCORPORATE NO MORE THAN FOUR' QUOTATIONS IN THE MEMORIAL TO BE DETERMINED THROUGH THE ARCHITECT AND THE ARTIST AT A LATER TIME. Bob Benson SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. F. Benches — Mr. Goergen indicated that staff recommends enough benches to accommodate seating for 12 people. Mr. Cardarelle stated that he thinks they should leave that for the architect and they can put them where they want whether it be for 10, 12, 15, etc. Mr. Keprios replied he just picked a number for a discussion point. Mr. Lonsbury asked is the idea to have benches or is the idea to have seating to which it was noted to have "seating ". John Lonsbury MOVED TO PROVIDE PERMANENT SEATING FOR SMALL NUMBERS OF PEOPLE FOR QUIET REFLECTION. Bob Benson SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. G. Hard Surface Area for Ceremonies — Mr. Keprios informed the committee that he may have overestimated that they need enough hard surface area for 150 people. He noted that it would be nice to have enough unobstructed space for 150 people. He indicated that he thinks there should be enough handicapped accessible hard space for a small gathering. Mr. Goergen stated that he has been to two memorial services at Eden Prairie and they used the hard surface space as the podium with the honored guests and speakers and there were approximately 250 people in attendance who sat in chairs on ( the grass. Barb Bender MOVED THAT THE ARCHITECT AND /OR ARTIST DESIGN AN AREA THAT WOULD ACCOMMODATE 150 PEOPLE AND THAT'S PARTLY ON HARD SPACE. Mr. Schwartz informed the committee that after talking to a vet friend of his it was explained to him that if you used the memorial as the podium that if you are looking down on it psychologically you are hunkering down in a fox hole. However, if you rise toward heaven you go up and noted that all of the really great memorials go up and aren't flat. Mr. Lonsbury noted that they are discussing three thoughts; the elevated from the surrounding topography, the idea that there should be an accommodation for people for ceremonies and third there should be some hard space for ceremonial events. John Lonsbury MOVED THAT THE MEMORIAL BE ELEVATED SLIGHTLY FROM THE SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY, THAT THERE BE A PERMANENT HARD SURFACE TO ALLOW FOR CEREMONIES AND THAT THE MEMORIAL AND ITS GENERAL SURROUNDING BE IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE MEMORIAL AND BE SUFFICIENT TO HAVE SEATING FOR UP TO 150 PEOPLE. Barb Bender SECONDED THE MOTION. Ms. Bender indicated that she needed to leave the meeting but wanted to express her opinions on agenda items H, I, J & K. For item H she agrees no bricks. For Item I she agrees no logos. In regard to Item J she would agree no donations box but perhaps they could put one at the library or another public area. For item K she agrees to commemorate Edina residents who were KIA she would just recommend that they designate a design that allows for growth. Mr. Lonsbury asked the committee if they could group H, I & J and table them because Ms. Bender, the fundraising co- chair, needs to leave and these three agenda items are part of fundraising. He indicated that he does agree no to the bricks, no to the logos and no to the donation box. Mr. Lonsbury stated that if a motion is needed today on what needs to be given to the architects or whatever he would make that motion. Mr. Goergen commented that he thinks they can table those three items. John Lonsbury MOVED THAT THEY TABLE THOSE THREE ITEMS. Bob Benson SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. H. Granite Tablet: Names of all Edina Residents KIA — Mr. Goergen asked for a motion to include in the memorial some type of tablet honoring those Edina residents who were killed in action. Marshall Schwartz MOVED Bob Kojetin SECONDED THE MOTION. In favor: Mike Goergen, Frank Cardarelle, Jason Christiaansen, bob Kojetin, Marshall Schwartz, bob Benson Against: John Lonsbury MOTION CARRIED. I. Sustainability - Mr. Christiaansen stated that he would like to add one thing to the elements and that is to include the idea of sustainability. He noted this could be a direction for the architects whether it involves things such as being green or using efficient lighting for the flags, etc. He commented that it doesn't necessarily need to be a lot but he thinks that could also help with fundraising because some people are very in favor of that. He added that might be something to give direction to the architects as far as sustainable elements in the design. Mr. Benson indicated that when Mr. Schwartz and he went to the memorials in St. Paul some of them looked kind of ratty from a sustainability standpoint because they really are not that old so to him sustainability is a really important element. Mr.. Christiaansen replied that he means sustainability in "green" design. Mr. Keprios added that "environmentally friendly" is another way to put it such as energy efficient lighting, using sustainable materials, trying not to destroy any more trees than you have to, etc. Mr. Christiaansen added using recycled and reused material or even reusing that flag pole. He noted that kind of thing would be representative of sort of contemporary or modern thinking and design. He noted that he would like to be proactive in mentioning this to the architect. Mr. Lonsbury commented permeable surfaces and all the rest of it. If that's a motion he will SECOND IT. Mr. Goergen asked what are they calling it which Mr. Christiaansen replied "sustainable elements ". 4 N Mr. Kojetin pointed out that what he thought was very impressive and complimented the memorial at Eden Prairie was the flowers and feels if they don't have a lot of flowers it will look flat. Mr. Goergen noted that he agrees it did finish their memorial. Mr. Kojetin commented that this is something that could be taken over by the Garden Council and other volunteers. Mr. Cardarelle pointed out that they will need to have complete irrigation for the flower beds in order to keep them really nice. Mr. Goergen asked if that would be an element that the architect would concern himself with. Mr. Lonsbury replied that when they are selecting an architectural firm they will want to make sure they have landscape architects or are at least associated or partnered with a landscape firm. Mr. Benson commented that he hears Mr. Christiaansen point about sustainability but he also thinks along with that there needs to be durability. He noted that they can put a lot of green things in there that are very appropriate today but will they withstand our climate over a period of many years. Mr. Christiaansen replied that's actually included by not having to replace it, it would be considered a green element. Mr. Goergen asked if that would be included in the element of sustainability. Mr. Christiaansen replied he thinks permanence is understood with the idea of a memorial. Mr. Benson indicated that when he was in St. Paul some of the memorials did not look very good and to him it really diminishes the whole impact. Mr. Keprios asked what materials didn't look good to which Mr. Benson replied he would have to research that. Mr. Schwartz added that it just didn't have the dignity that Eden Prairie does. Mr. Goergen asked if it was part of the construction or part of the maintenance to which Mr. Benson replied that it might be a combination of the materials and craftsmanship that went into it. Mr. Kojetin indicated that since they are talking about the elements they will also need the architect to talk to the Minnehaha Watershed District because they will be involved in this to some degree. He noted that it is their jurisdiction along the creek. Mr. Schwartz commented that if they are talking about sustainability and giving instructions to the architect they need to keep in mind what General Schulstad said that any public monument can be defaced and vandalized. Therefore, he would strongly recommend that they use granite and that they specify to use the granite with the shiny surface and not the rough surface. He noted if someone does come with a can of spray paint, the shiny surface granite will be a lot easier to clean. Mr. Lonsbury indicated that they've kind of veered off of sustainability in terms of what it really means. He noted that sustainability is not durability or maintenance or even the landscape ideas that were brought up. He stated that means a very specific item. Mr. Christiaansen noted that it means environmental sensitivity rather than durability. Mr. Lonsbury added that design and materials is sustainability and that does mean something to the architect. Mr. Goergen asked if the motion includes durability as part of it. Mr. Christiaansen replied that should be mentioned separately as far as 5 durability of the material. Mr. Lonsbury stated that durability, maintenance and all of \ that is a separate deal. Mr. Goergen asked• all those in favor the sustainability motion. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY John Lonsbury MOVED THAT PART OF THE DESIGN WOULD INCLUDE LANDSCAPE DESIGN THAT WOULD INCLUDE FLOWERS AND THOSE TYPES OF ELEMENTS. Bob Benson SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Bob Benson MOVED THAT DURABILITY FACTORS BE CONSIDERED IN SELECTING THE MEMORIAL'S CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS AND CONSIDERING MAINTENANCE OF THE MEMORIAL. John Lonsbury SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Keprios informed the committee that on Tuesday he brought before the Park Board the $30,000 recommendation in the Capital Improvement Plan for the memorial. He also informed the Park Board that it is the committee's intent to put the memorial at Utley Park and noted that the Park Board did approve those recommendations. He stated that one comment that was brought up, however, is what conditions are the restrooms in and that maybe they will need to be renovated. Mr. Keprios indicated that is not something he is going to put on the shoulders of the committee but felt it was a good comment on their part. Mr. Goergen informed the committee that they also discussed the fact that there needs to be some kind of community input. Mr. Schwartz indicated that he has been going to churches to look for information on the KIA and the response he has received has been wonderful. He noted that it occurred to him that there might be room for a standing committee down the road that would be for community participation. He indicated that he is active with the boy scouts and he knows there are community projects and also Eagle Scout projects where they could be involved such as cleaning up the park. Mr. Schwartz stated that if the response he has received from the churches is indicative then they have a real good level of support. He commented that he thinks it would be worthwhile to gather those people and have a community meeting and tell them what it is they are doing. He added that they should at least have articles in the Sun Current. Mr. Keprios replied those are some great comments, but those are more staff issues and they can do that in their adopt -a -park program. He noted that they also have a great relationship with the Edina Garden Council and really liked Mr. Kojetin's idea. Mr. Keprios stated that he receives calls from Eagle Scouts every month asking about projects, but they need to remember they are limited in what they can do, they cannot operate certain power tools, etc., but he certainly can take a look at it. Mr. Keprios indicated that he is still not sure how they are going to go about getting public input. He's not sure if they should have an open house, give a presentation and let them be part of the planning process. The other way is this committee does all of _ G the planning and will ask the residents to respond whether they like it or not and that would be more of a public hearing. III. EDINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION DESIGNATED FUND AGREEMENT Mr. Keprios informed the committee that he wants to make sure everyone understands the fiscal partnership they have with the Edina Community Foundation. He asked them to particularly..pay close attention to the following "Contributions shall be.recognized by a permanent plaque at the site that states substantially the following: "This Veteran's Memorial is a gift to the City of Edina by the Edina Community Foundation made possible by contributions from the general public ". Mr.'Keprios stated that he doesn't have an issue with it but asked the committee if they would like to propose different language. Mr. Lonsbury asked if the Edina Foundation gets a percentage of the money they raise or only the interest that accrues on the account. Mr. Keprios replied there will be a small ' charge to cover whatever expenses they are going to incur from mailings and real true out - of- pocket expenses. He added there is so little earned by interest that he doesn't think that is going to cover it. Mr. Lonsbury asked what mailings they will be doing to which Mr. Keprios replied primarily thank you letters miscellaneous correspondence. Mr. Lonsbury stated that he does have an idea for different wording if this is negotiable with the Edina Foundation, "THIS VETERAN'S MEMORIAL IS A GIFT TO THE CITY OF EDINA BY ITS CITIZENS MADE POSSIBLE THROUGH THE ASSISTANCE OF THE EDINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION." The committee all agreed.they liked it. Mr. Goergen asked in regards to the agreement do we have to clarify what services they provide. Mr. Keprios replied that is a good question and he will ask the Foundation. He indicated that they will also need to change the names on the agreement to the Mayor, City Manager and the Edina Foundation; not the Park Director. Mr. Goergen commented that he doesn't know if it makes much difference to this agreement but Bob Reed questions the wording of "Edina residents who died while serving in the United States Armed Forces during wartime ". He noted that Mr. Reed brought up the point of what's considered legitimate death meaning combat versus an auto accident when the war was being fought in Europe. Mr. Schwartz pointed out that they already have one situation just -like that. Mr. Goergen stated that they will address those at a later date. Mr. Keprios commented that he doesn't have any issue with changing the language.- It should read how the committee wants it to read. The current language in the agreement is "... unincorporated association committed to honoring all Edina veterans and especially Edina residents who died while serving in the United States armed forces during wartime. " Mr. Schwartz stated that he would like "died for their country in service of their country.'. Mr. Goergen replied that covers it if they want to include airplane accidents, traffic accidents, etc. Mr. Kojetin stated that he would like to see what the final wording is after negotiating with the Edina Foundation before the committee approves it. Mr. Keprios indicated that 7 he will have the revised language at the October meeting for the committee to vote on at that time. IV. STANDING COMMITTEE REPORTS A. Fundraising/Treasurer — Mr. Goergen informed the committee that Ms. Bender, Mr. Kojetin, Mr. Keprios and he recently met to formulate a basis of a fundraising plan. Once it is formalized a little bit more they will present their plan to the committee. B. Research (KIA) — Mr. Schwartz informed the committee that right now they have identified 14, possibly 16, KIA from WWII through the Vietnam War. He noted that Mr. Benson will be contacting the Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs to see what they may be able to find. C. Marketing/Community Relations — Mr. Lonsbury informed the committee that the marketing and relations committee functions in support of fundraising and the approval process. He noted that he thinks it's important to understand that marketing isn't going to go out there and be proactive; it is going to be in support of and work closely with fundraising and also the approval process. Mr. Lonsbury stated that he anticipates heavy reliance on the city's Communications Department to actually develop the materials and things like that. Mr. Lonsbury pointed out that this committee has three main objectives: to generate awareness of the memorial, to educate citizens and donors on benefits of the memorial `W and to support the request for donations. He indicated that there are three different audiences that they are going to be addressing. He noted those are the "Key Donors ", they will be preparing materials and presentations to ask for key donor support. The second audience they will call "Targeted Segments" which include neighbors, service organizations, veteran groups, etc., and again can support the approval and/or fundraising effort. The third group is what they will call the "General Population" and that would be more the articles and publicity and basically just keeping the general population informed. He indicated that this is just the committee's idea of how they are thinking and trying to structure the marketing and community relations. Mr. Schwartz asked the committee that if while they are talking to people and someone says they know of someone who was KIA try to get some basic details like name, which war, etc. He noted to just give that information then to Mr. Benson or himself. Mr. Lonsbury commented that they can certainly include that in their materials and presentations, that if people know of anyone to let them know. MEETING ADJOURNED �" 8 VETERANS MEMORIAL COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES FROM NOVEMBER 19, 2010 The following are Minutes from the Veterans Memorial Committee held in the Community Room at City Hall on Friday, November 19, 2010 at 7:30 am Volunteers in attendance: Chairman Mike Goergen, Frank Cardarelle, Bob Kojetin, John Lonsbury, Marshall Schwartz, Robert Reed, Herb Lefler Volunteers unable to attend: Justin Kieffer, Bob Benson, Jason Christiaansen, Barbara Bender Staff in attendance: John Keprios, Edina Park and Recreation Department Director Janet Canton, Edina Park and Recreation Office Coordinator I. APPROVAL OF THE SEPTEMBER 17, 2010 MINUTES Bob Kojetin MOVED TO APPROVE THE SEPTEMBER 17, 2010 VETERANS MEMORIAL COMMITTEE MINUTES. John Lonsbury SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. II. ELEMENTS OF MEMORIAL A. Gift Bricks — Mr. Goergen noted this item was tabled from the September 17`h meeting. He indicated that it is staff's recommendation not to incorporate gift bricks into the project. Mr. Goergen indicated that his view is that hopefully they will not need to use gift bricks as part of their fundraising and added that they are going to honor the veterans with the memorial itself. Mr. Keprios commented that he thinks gift bricks are a wonderful tool in the right setting but in this case he thinks that the only names that should be etched in something permanent should be veterans. John Lonsbury MOVED NOT TO HAVE BRICKS AS PART OF THE PROJECT Frank Cardarelle SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. B. Recognition of Donors — Mr. Goergen noted this item was tabled from the September 17`h meeting. He indicated that staff is recommending permanent recognition of only the most substantial donors, without logos, with a statement of thanks to all those who contributed. In addition, it should also include language requested in the agreement with the Edina Community Foundation. Mr. Cardarelle commented that he thought they had previously discussed putting the names of those who donated more in the historical setting rather than on the memorial itself. Mr. Goergen stated that his thought is to make it part of the memorial but not a prominent part. Mr. Lonsbury indicated that if someone wanted to donate a substantial amount of money, which the committee would determine what substantial is, they may want the option of having • their name inscribed on something and there would be a separate tablet for that. He noted the idea is not to list the $10.00, $5.00, etc., contributors but rather the substantial ones with the idea if it's a corporate donation they are not going to get 3 foot corporate logo, etc., they will only get their name or the company name inscribed. Mr. Lefler indicated that in trying to raise substantial donations they are treading a fine line between what people are expecting and what is going to make them happy. He noted it might not cut it for them if their name is not near the memorial itself. He noted that he thinks not having them in the actual memorial makes a huge amount of sense, however, if it's going to be at a completely separate location it might affect their fundraising efforts. When people are asked for a substantial amount of money they may want to come up with a design that would tastefully incorporate sponsors without infringing on the memorial so that they would have something to actually tell people how they will be recognized when they are looking to donate. Mr. Lonsbury commented that he thinks one of the things confusing them with the permanent recognition is the word "but" where it should maybe be the word "and ". It should state "permanent recognition of only the most substantial donors but without logos and a statement of thanks to all those who contributed." He stated that what they are really thinking about is permanent recognition of only those who give a lot of money, without logos, and a statement of thanks to all of those who contributed. He noted the permanent marker would be part of the site but wouldn't necessarily be a pedestal or sculpture. It would be a permanent separate recognition listing only the names of the substantial donors and a general thanks to everyone who contributed along with the statement for the foundation. Mr. Lonsbury informed the committee that they came up with some ideas at the fundraising meeting in that donors could be recognized in other ways. One idea was to have a miniature statue of whatever the artwork ends up being that they could put in their office, etc., and it would be more of a constant reminder to the substantial donors and try not to make a big deal out of it at the site. Mr. Goergen stated that he doesn't think it has to be one or the other because they should utilize something to thank them in many ways. He added that there will also be some kind of dedication ceremony where they will be recognized as well as permanently at the Historical Society. Mr. Lefler stated that when they are talking about major donors they are talking about the project as a whole rather than selling off pieces and that when they are talking about a presentation for fundraising it encompasses the whole project, nobody is going to own a piece of it. Mr. Goergen replied that is a good point because that could come up with a potential donor. John Lonsbury MOVED THAT THE PLANS INCLUDE SOME SORT OF PERMANENT RECOGNITION FOR SUBSTANTIAL DONORS WITHOUT LOGOS AND THE STATEMENT SAYING THANKS TO ALL WHO CONTRIBUTED AND INCLUDES THE LANGUAGE REQUESTED IN THE AGREEMENT BY THE EDINA FOUNDATION. Herb Lefler SECONDED THE MOTION. 2 Mr. Kojetin asked about the Community Foundation to which Mr. Lonsbury replied they have to have their statement "made possible through the assistance of the Edina Community Foundation ". Mr. Kojetin stated that he questions why they should put their name on it when they aren't going to raise any money for it. Mr. Lefler replied it's because of the tax deductibility of the gift to which Mr. Kojetin replied the city could do the same thing if they wanted to give it to the city. He stated that the Community Foundation doesn't raise money and have big fundraisers like they used to. All they do is collect money from somebody else, it's a clearing house. Mr. Lonsbury noted that he will make the friendly amendment and change it to just everything except for the Community Foundation language and they will deal with that if and when they come to it. Herb Lefler SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. C. Donation Box/Literature - Mr. Goergen indicated that this item was tabled from the September 17`h meeting. He noted it is staff's recommendation that there not be a donation box. However, staff does recommend a stand to distribute literature that directs people who to contact for donations. One idea is to include a donation box at the Historical Society's museum once there is a permanent veteran's memorial display at the museum. John Lonsbury MOVED THAT THEY HAVE A DISPLAY STAND FOR LITERATURE BUT THAT THEY DO NOT HAVE A DONATION BOX AT THE SITE. Frank Cardarelle SECONDED THE MOTION. Mr. Reed asked who is going to service the donation box to which Mr. Keprios replied that is why he recommended to not having one at Utley Park. Mr. Kojetin asked 50 years from now who is going to still be putting literature in the stand. Mr. Lonsbury replied that he doesn't think this needs to be a permanent situation but that they at least have it there now. He noted that it may not actually have to hold literature but could be a plaque or display just so there is something to inform visitors if they want to make a donation this is what they can do. Mr. Goergen commented that he hopes once they have some type of architect rendering they could advertise it at the site stating this is the future home of the memorial with some kind a notation saying where to go for information to make a contribution. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. D. Other Elements - Mr. Kojetin indicated the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District will need to be involved in this at some point because with the large surface area the run -off will have to go someplace. He noted that he thinks they should recommend some kind of a rain garden along the creek shoreline. He stated that he will talk with the Watershed District because they will probably contribute the money to do this. He noted they could probably also ask them to be a contributor to the memorial as well. 44 Mr. Reed indicated that he wasn't at the last meeting but did have a couple of comments regarding hard surface. First, if you limit the amount of hard surface it would be considered by the Watershed District because it's a ratio of hard surface run- off to do something. Secondly, there are designs now for hard surfaces that do meet the criteria for run -off and a good architect or landscaper knows that and he thinks it should be considered in the design of the memorial. Mr. Reed commented that he also questions the need for a lot of hard surface area. Mr. Lefler stated that if the Watershed District is going to provide the resources to do the rain garden/runoff control he would assume the committee would want a very strong voice in the design element of that as well. Mr. Goergen asked would it be a permanent or a temporary rain garden to which Mr. Kojetin responded it would be permanent. Mr. Cardarelle noted that first they will need to get an architect's rendering of what they are going to do then the architects and engineers will start to look at where a rain garden would be best suited. He stated once you have the beginnings then you need the artist rendering of what you want to do and then the architect will take it from there and do the specific designs. Mr. Goergen commented that at some point a future topic they will need to discuss is what, if anything, do they want to do to modify the site. He noted that after a third visit to the site it seemed to him that the size of the gazebo may overwhelm the memorial or challenge it as a focal point in that small area. He stated that they may want to consider moving it if at all possible to which Mr. Keprios replied that they do have the flexibility to move the gazebo. Mr. Keprios informed the committee that the fire ring at Utley Park was built for the Boy Scouts and similar small groups and is used quite frequently; however, it is in jeopardy because the Environment Energy Commission wants to get rid of all wood burning fireplaces and campfires. Mr. Kojetin indicated that it was previously mentioned that the flag pole that is currently located in the northeast corner has a plaque that may be moved and asked if they do move it what will they do with the original. He noted that he thinks the plaque is more important than the footings or what the flag is mounted on. Mr. Reed commented that he doesn't think they should even discuss keeping the old flag pole. Mr. Cardarelle stated that he thinks that would be part of the architect's requirements that we would put on them. Mr. Goergen commented that even as a group if they want to move it they should take into consideration it is the American Legion's. Mr. Kojetin noted that it was the American Legion's but it's a group of citizens from around the Country Club area. Mr. Reed stated what if they move it, it doesn't fit, its 50 years old and it doesn't have the new materials and mechanism in it. He noted that they should also come up with an alternate site if they move it and added that it will cost money. Mr. Schwartz indicated there is another pole at Wooddale Park where the old school was. He noted that if the American Legion were to make a fuss they could always move it to that site. He stated then they could still have their three flags around the memorial and the American Legion's flag wouldn't interfere with the memorial view. 4 Mr. Reed indicated that a statue is defined as a three dimensional representation of a person, animal or mythical being. He stated that he thinks it should read either one focal point and leave it at that or one focal point structure. Mr. Keprios commented that the focal point probably should read sculpture and not statue. Mr. Reed again stated that he thinks it should say focal point or focal point structure. Mr. Lonsbury indicated that to him the word "structure" means something different than piece of art. Mr. Reed commented that he thinks they are all in agreement that this memorial is for past, present and future and if they were to put in some type of figure he thinks they are limiting it to a time an d place and he has a problem with that. He noted there are dozens of memorials around for different conflicts of wars and each one of those has a representation figure of whatever the current fighting mode was at that time. He added most of the time it never depicts anybody but an infantry man. Therefore he feels if they truly are thinking about an everlasting memorial for all veterans now, future and past they should steer clear of a figure sculpture. Mr. Kojetin commented that he recently talked to someone who was at a memorial park and the center focal point of the structure were three stones in the center and said that it looked very nice. Mr. Lonsbury indicated that in terms of language he thinks they need to say that its art work, it's a focal point piece of art or something like that. He noted that he's not trying to define what it is; it's just that we all know we are looking to commission an artist to create something for the focal point. Mr. Keprios suggested the language "one artistic symbolic focal point ". III. EDINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION DESIGNATED FUND AGREEMENT Mr. Keprios indicated that Mr. Kojetin brought up a good point that not everybody feels the same and that the City of Edina can do this without any assistance from the Edina Community Foundation, it is possible. He explained that it would be a little more work on staff time, which is fine and he has no issue with that. Mr. Goergen noted that what was so strong on the original statement is the Community Foundation wanted recognition for funding it which they are not funding a thing, they are filtering. He pointed out that Dick Crocket, Executive Director of the Edina Community Foundation, wants to meet with him because he has some fundraising ideas. He noted Mr. Crockett has some concerns that if they don't get enough funding what are they going to do with the funds that are just sitting there. He noted the Community Foundation can also help them identify and provide a lot of information on potential significant contributors and that as a foundation they collect data on who gives to what, where and when and they would be giving the committee an opportunity to use that information. Mr. Kojetin commented that he hasn't seen any, fundraising that the foundation has done for itself. He noted that they used to go out and raise funds which they've kind of gotten away from their original scope of how they formed themselves. Mr. Lonsbury indicated that they need to decide if they want to use the foundation. He noted they need to keep in mind that the foundation does have some fundraising capabilities and indicated he thinks they are going to need all the help they can get. Mr. Lonsbury suggested that maybe they should state to the foundation that it's great they are providing them with so many names to follow -up on, but since they are getting top billing 5 and we do have a substantial gift policy that we would expect them to be a substantial contributor. He stated, however, that they should only ask them this if as a committee they are going to use the Community Foundation. Mr. Lonsbury indicated that he thinks the language has already been softened and he thinks they should go ahead and move forward with the idea. Mr. Kojetin stated that he would agree to that. Mr. Cardarelle informed the committee that he knows the Edina Rotary Foundation has a lot of money and there are a lot of other foundations out there. Mr. Goergen responded that they hope to tap those foundations. He indicated as a side note that Mr. Crockett has informed him there are grants out there; it's just a matter of finding a grant writer. Mr. Kojetin stated that he thinks they should table this because they won't be filtering any money through them for at least another three to four months. He noted that he would hate to see something that would be put on a plaque and be permanent at this time in the state of this development before they get a chance to talk to other donors. Mr. Goergen stated that maybe they should consider just stating that their assistance will be acknowledged and not to pin them down on what is going to be put on the plaque a year and a half from now. Mr. Lefler noted that his concern is if they take this language and put it verbatim he thinks it may leave one with the thought that if it wasn't for the Edina Community Foundation this would not have occurred. He stated if they could change it so that it doesn't appear as though the Community Foundation is the be all and end all in terms of without them this gift wouldn't have been made. He indicated that he thinks there may be issues with other donors if they are putting something on there that says it's made possible, which implies without the Community Foundation this would not have happened. He noted that what he is hearing is they are a mechanism of process rather than a substitute donor and he would hate to alienate somebody who came with checkbook in hand and may want the same sort, of language. Mr. Goergen stated that he thinks they can do two things: they can table it and discuss it or they can remove it and just make a statement that their assistance will be acknowledged in some way. Mr. Keprios replied that he doesn't think that is going to cut it for them. He indicated that he thinks the committee first needs to decide if they want to use the Community Foundation as the funding vehicle where the money comes in and goes out or do they want to go with the city of Edina. He noted if it is decided you want to go with the Community Foundation then they need to come up with some language real soon because he would like to bring these documents to the City Council to move forward. He added that they have already approved the $30,000; however they can't spend it until he gets the ordinance and resolution in place. Mr. Keprios asked the committee if he understands this correctly that if the Community Foundation isn't willing to contribute any money towards the memorial then you want nothing to do with them. Mr. Lonsbury stated that his point is if the Community Foundation is going to really help them and if there is really value in coming alongside beyond just the conduit then he would be willing to trade his sentence for their assistance if the assistance is real. He stated that it doesn't have to be money but they really need them to put them in touch with donors. Mr. Lefler commented that when dealing with philanthropic giving for public projects in Edina they expect to go through the Community. Foundation and if they don't it's a lot harder work. Therefore, he would say it's pretty substantial assistance because they may, be the gatekeeper. Mr. Keprios commented that is where he is coming from because he thinks psychologically .a lot of people may not want to write a check to the government because they feel they already give enough money to the government. Mr. Kojetin indicated thafhe still'thinks the statement says they're the ones that did it. Mr. Goergen commented that it was so much stronger in the first draft`before they came up with this one. Their first one made it sound like they were funding the whole thing. Mr. Keprios stated that maybe they just putiheir name on the list with everyone else thanking them for -their assistance rather than a special plaque just for the Community Foundation. . Mr. Lonsbury pointed out that he is trying to respond to Mr. Keprios to get this going. He noted that deleting it will abe. a lot easier than changing it so the question is do they want to have the whole sentence, "contributions shall be recognized by a permanent plaque at that site that state substantially the following:" or do they want to take that whole sentence out of the contract. He noted another possibility would be to say "contributions shall be recognized'by a perm anent plaque at the site ". Mr. Keprios suggested "the Community Foundation will be appropriately recognized - within the memorial ". Mr. Lonsbury indicated that he .thinks they need to have the documents signed by the Mayor saying we are ready to go so that it will give them a little more leveraging on negotiating. Mr. Lonsbury stated that he likes what Mr. Keprios said for the legal document that "the Community Foundation will be appropriately recognized somewhere within the memorial to -be determined by the committee ". John Lonsbury STATED WITH THAT AMENDMENT HE WOULD MOVE TO APPROVE THE AGREEMENT TO GO FORWARD TO THE CITY COUNCIL. Herb Lefler SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. IV. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL FOR AN ARCHITECT A. Letter Mr. Lonsbury asked is it necessary to have the approval of the committee to direct'Mr. Keprios to send a, request for proposal because he trusts Mr. Keprios -and staff to write the language. Mr: Keprios replied that what he wanted to hear was what was said previously "artistic, focal point ". Mr. Reed indicated that he has a comment under project descriptions #4 on the RFP regarding mottos. He noted that he has a problem with- mottos, he was in the Navy 25 years and never knew they had a motto. He stated they all know the symbols but how many people know the mottos. Mr. Goergen commented that he believes from a previous meeting that they all agreed to leave the mottos open ended and was to be determined. He noted that there are still several details to be determined but since it wasn't decided the architect may well put the mottos in. Mr. Keprios indicated that he will change the language to say "display of emblems and possibly mottos ". 7 Mr. Keprios indicated that he thinks he will get responses from some of the architects he is sending the RFP to. He noted that he will send all of the responses he receives to the committee to look over and then at one of their meetings he would like the committee to decide which ones they would like to interview. He added that he will also have his recommendations. Mr. Goergen pointed out that Mr. Christiaansen is an architect; unfortunately, he was unable to be at their meeting, and thinks he should be their sounding board about the architectural procedures and can be their in -house expert. Mr. Cardarelle commented that he thinks $300,000 for the project sounds a little low. Mr. Keprios suggested raising it to $400,000. Mr. Cardarelle noted that he thinks they are looking at close to one -half million dollars and doesn't see how they could do it for less than that. Mr. Goergen asked how much did Eden Prairie end up paying for their Veterans Memorial to which Mr. Keprios replied he thinks they are close to one million dollars. Mr. Goergen stated that he doesn't want it to be too low either but feels they need to have something to base it on if they are going from $300,000 to $500,000. Mr. Kojetin commented that he thinks Mr. Keprios figure of $300,000 was a starting point and once they are done with the architect that person will have a better idea of what it's going to cost for square footage for the memorial. Mr. Goergen asked if that would entrap them or impede them. Mr. Keprios replied he doesn't think so but that would be a question for the city attorney. He noted that he thinks he would just have to go back with another resolution. Mr. Goergen indicated that they need an amount because people have been asking him what their goal is. Mr. Keprios pointed out that the problem is you can't pay for an architect until you have a resolution so it's a catch 22. He noted he will go ahead and put $400,000 as the figure for the City Council and he will let them know up front that they are not quite sure if this amount will be too little or too much. V. SELECTING AN ARTIST Mr. Goergen indicated that staff would like the committee to use the Edina Public Art Committee's (EPAC) help in finding an artist for the memorial. Mr. Reed commented that he has a problem with the old adage too many cooks. He noted that maybe they should just appoint one person to be the liaison with this committee. He stated he thinks the decision should be made by the Veterans Committee Members. Mr. Goergen responded that he thinks what is being offered is an as needed liaison initially in supplying the artist. Mr. Keprios stated that when he met with the EPAC he made it very clear that the Veteran's Committee will be the ones who are going to decide whatever this artistic center point is going to be. He explained that the EPAC has some real expertise on finding the artists to fit what it is we are looking for and the process that should be followed, they will only be here to offer suggestions. Mr. Keprios indicated that what he would ask is when they have selecting an artist on their agenda that they ask a representative or two from the EPAC to attend the meeting and talk about the process of selecting an artist. He noted that if after that meeting their services won't be needed it's okay to say thanks, but we've changed our 8 mind and at least that gives the EPAC an opportunity share what they know. Mr. Goergen stated that they will address that issue. VI. ORDINANCE FOR CITY COUNCIL Mr. Keprios informed the committee that an ordinance is required by state law before a city can spend funds on a Veterans Memorial. He noted that what he likes about this language is that it makes it very clear we are not only going to develop it we are going to use tax supported dollars to maintain it. Therefore it states: "The city shall erect, equip and maintain a memorial in recognition of the services performed by veterans of the United States Armed Forces. The memorial shall be constructed at Utley Park at 50th Street and Wooddale Avenue in Edina. He noted that the Park and Recreation Department will be responsible for the supervision and control of the memorial following its completion. John Lonsbury MOVED THAT WE RECOMMEND THE ORDINACE AS WRITTEN. Marshall Schwartz SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. VII. STANDING COMMITTEE REPORTS A. Research (KIAs) — Mr. Schwartz informed the committee that initially he was looking at 15 to 20 KIA but is now looking at approximately 25 to 30. He stated that if anyone knows of anybody in the community or outside of the community who knows somebody who has been killed in action to please call him, it would be very much appreciated. VIII. MISCELLANEOUS A. Topography Survey - Mr. Keprios thanked Mr. Cardarelle for doing the topography survey that was very generous. B. February Meeting — Mr. Keprios noted that he will unable to attend the February 18th meeting and asked if they could reschedule their February meeting to February 11 to He asked the committee members to check their calendars and get back to him. MEETING ADJOURNED Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Energy and Environment Commission Edina City Hall Community Room Thursday, November 18, 2010, 7 P.M. Members In Attendance and Roll Call: Dianne Plunkett Latham, Michael Platteter, Bill Sierks, Julie Risser (arrived 7:40), Susan Tucker, Bob Gubrud, M. Germana Paterlini, Surya lyer, Karwehn Kata Absent: Alma Pronove, Paul Thompson Staff Present: Jane Timm Welcome Meeting was called to order at 7:00 p.m. by Chair [ham. 1. Approval of Agenda and Topic Time Allocation The agenda was approved as written. 2. Approval of October 14, minutes The October 14, 2010 minutes were unanimously approved. 3. Community Comment - None 4. Chair Report Chair Latham gave an update on the 3 Rivers Region Trail. Chair Latham reminded the Commission that Commissioner Platteter would represent the EEC at the City Council meeting December 7, 2010. Chair Latham asked that everyone read the City of Edina Media Policy forwarded by Jennifer Bennerotte. 5. Hara Software Commissioner Paterlini gave an update on the cost of the Hara software. The company called and needed an update but Commissioner Paterlini informed them that a decision could not be made at this time. Commissioner Paterlini explained the fees required to start the software product in the City of Edina. Commissioner Paterlini will send City Manager, Scott Neal the information. Commissioner Paterlini gave an update on the Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP). City of Edina was invited to do the CDP questionnaire. They discussed doing the questionnaire. Commissioner Paterlini made a motion for EEC on behalf of the City of Edina to participate in the next stage of the Carbon Disclosure Project by completing the questionnaire at no cost to the City of Edina. Commissioner Gubrud seconded. Motion carried unanimously. 6. GreenStep Cities Chair Latham gave an update on when the GreenStep Cities would go before the City Council. Commissioner Platteter suggested it go to council after the new council member was seated. Chair Latham asked Secretary Timm to relay the request to Scott Neal. Chair Latham would talk to Scott Neal and Mayor Hovland about how much time she would be allowed at the council meeting. Chair Latham will send out a draft of the handout that will go to council members. 7. New Members There was a discussion about new interested members. New members Allen Glotzman and Scott Weicht would be notified about the Education and Outreach Working Group. Commissioner Gubrud will contact them. Commissioner Gubrud made a motion to approve Todd Willmert and John Holland to the Education and Outreach Working Group. Commissioner Paterlini seconded. Motion carried unanimously. r Page 12 8. Xcel Energy Assessment Program Commissioner Platteter gave an update on having assessments done on the largest city buildings. The cost is $200 to $300 per building. He would discuss this with City Manager Neal. 9. Budget Commissioner Paterlini separated the EEC budget from the GreenStep budget. There was a discussion and some updates were given to Commissioner Paterlini. 10. Turf Management Task Force Commissioner Paterlini gave an update. She explained that Vince Cockriel needs to send her a report on what chemicals were used in his organic spraying program. Commissioner Paterlini will send red -lined policy to commissioners by email when updated. 11. Alternative Energy Working Group Commissioner lyer gave an update of their meeting. They put together a windsource resolution recommending the City of Edina replace 15% of electricity using windsource. The working group is also working on developing an ordinance modeling an ordinance developed by the City of Naperville, IL. Commissioner Sierks applied for a renewable energy grant to put up solar panel. The value is $200,000. The city would be required to pay $25,000 to $30,000. The City Council would have to approve before going out for bid. Commissioner Sierks worked with Eric Roggeman, Assistant Finance Director. 12. Air and Water Quality Working Group Commissioner Tucker gave an update of the NEMO Workshop. The next step regarding storm water is to talk to Wayne Houle and get some City of Edina guidance. 13. Recycling and Solid Waste Working Group Report Chair Latham went over GreenStep, best practice #22, Managing Solid Waste revisions. Commissioner Gubrud made a motion to approve the revised best practice #22, Managing Solid Waste. Commissioner Sierks seconded. Motion carried unanimously. 14. Residential Energy Project Commissioner Platteter informed the commissioners about the Residential Energy Project mailer that was sent out to zip code 55436. 15. Education and Outreach Working Group Report. Commissioner Gubrud gave an update on high value and high do- ability projects. The working group agreed the Residential Energy Project was the best project. The working group would like to plan an educational public event. Commissioner Gubrud wanted to plant the seed with commissioners about a 2011 event. 16. Chair Latham asked that they discuss the website at the next meeting. Commissioner Sierks asked that Jennifer supply information on the traffic of the EEC website. The Commission discussed not having a dual commissioner (Planning and EEC). Commissioner Risser made a motion to request City Council to remove the Planning /EEC dual commissioner and retain Energy and Environment Commissioner only. Commissioner Gubrud seconded. Roll Call was taken: Ayes: Paterlini, Latham, Risser, Gubrud, Sierks, Tucker, lyer, Nays: Platteter Motion Carried. i j Page 13 Commissioner Platteter made a motion to cancel the December EEC meeting. Commissioner lyer seconded. Motion carried. 17. Future Meetings Commissioner Paterlini made a motion to adjourn. Commissioner Sierks seconded. Motion carried. The meeting adjourned at 9:35 p.m. The next meeting will be the regularly scheduled meeting at 7:00 p.m. January 13, 2011, at Edina City Hall. Respectfully submitted, Jane M. Timm, Deputy City Clerk u