Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2011-04-05 COUNCIL MEETING
e �O Tod Edina City Council From: _ City Manager Scott H. Neal City of Edina NEWID] J CC:. Braemar Golf Course Manager Todd Anderson, Braemar Arena Manager Doug Bauman, Communications& Marketing Director Jennifer Bennerotte, Liquor Operations. Director Steve Grausam, Art Center Director Diana Hedges, Edinborough Park Manager Ann Kattreh, Park & Recreation Director John Keprios, Assistant Park & Recreation Director Ed MacHolda, Assistant Finance Director Eric Roggeman and Centennial Lakes Park Manager Tom Shirley Date: April 1, 2011 Re: Draft 2010 -2011 Business Plan Updates It is a common practice for city governments to operate parks and leisure facilities in a manner that does not require these facilities to offer a financial return on investment onto recover 100 percent of their annual operating costs. Parks and leisure facilities have been viewed for centuries by city government leaders as essential for the livability of the city and for the physical, social and psychological health of its citizens. For many cities, the provision of parks and leisure facilities for its citizens is seen as one of the historically fundamental roles of a city government. However, in 21 st century America, it has become a common,practice in city governments all over our country to examine city government budgets with the purpose,of not only becoming more efficient, but of also making a concerted effort to properly align who pays for,services with who benefits from the services. This is not a difficult challenge for police protection, fire, suppression, land use regulation or snow, removal. services. Alignment of who pays for services and who receives services is a challenge in the Park &Recreation service area because it is both legally and operationally difficult to deny services or access to non - residents or non - taxpayers. Edinborough Park is ,a good example of. this challenge. By our own data, most of the customers'who use Edinborough Park are not Edina residents, but all of the subsidy that is_ bquired to covehthe operating deficit of the park comes from the City of Edina, which to date has been drawn froAthe ., ----- Edinborough/Centennial- Lakes- Fund. -Ifs- important- for_the City-Council-to ackn�owledge.this .non- __.__.__ P p Y — - -- - alignriient of who pays versus who is served and to provide olic direction to City staff regarding how the facility should be managed given this service/support non - alignment. The Council could take the same position as many cities would that the;City of Edina will provide financial support for Edinborough Park because it is part of our pub_ lic park system that is enjoyed by, the public without regard to residency, similar to the position taken by the Minneapolis Park Board with regard to Lake Harnett or Lake Calhoun. Or the Council could take a position that Edinborough Park is really more of a "recreational facility' than it is a traditional public park, and that the people'who use it ought to pay 100 percent of the cost for it to be available and operational to them. Either_ position or a hybrid of both is legally and morally defensible. But the clearer the position of the Council on this matter, the easier it will be for staff to meet and set goals for the management of the facility that will be pleasing to the Council. I di a 0 0 I��RPOT3A 20- 0/� Business Plans r .j of Et) i- __ (DOD MM ART CEMMY, AQ Li N E CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK -�� i EDINA :� LIQUOR Pa& r i L J _ E C I T Y O F D I N A -� �_ r- BRAEMAR ARENA i `. I - Edina A. o e vd LO 201 0=201 I •���• Business Plans T A B L E ' O F C O N T E N T S Braemar Arena Summary.............................................................................................................:. ............................... 1 BusinessStrategy Update ...................................................................................... ............................... 1 Significant Changes in Business /Competitive Environment .................................... ............................... 3 Financial Performance ........................................................................................... ............................... 4 Braemar Golf Course Summary............................................................................................................... ............................... 7 BusinessStrategy Update ...................................................................................... ............................... 9 Significant Changes in Business /Competitive Environment .................................. ............................... 10 Financial Performance ......................................................................................... ............................... 12 Centennial Lakes & Edinborough Parks Centennial Lakes Park Summary .......................................................................... ............................... 14 BusinessStrategy Update .................................................................................... ............................... 15 Centennial Lakes Park Significant Changes in Business /Competitive Environment .............................. 16 EdinboroughPark Summary ................................................................................ ............................... 19 BusinessStrategy Update .......................................................:............................ ............................... 19 Edinborough Park Significant Changes in Business /Competitive Environment ..... ............................... 24 Customer Analysis: 2007 - 2010 ............................................................................. ............................... 26 Financial Performance ......................................................................................... ............................... 27 Edina Art Center Summary............................................................................................................. ............................... 30 BusinessStrategy Update .................................................................................... ............................... 32 Significant Changes in Business /Competitive Environment .................................. ............................... 34 Financial Performance ......................................................................................... ............................... 36 Edina Aquatic Center Summary............................................................................................................. ...... .I........................ 38 Businessstrategy Update .................:................................................................. ............................... 38 Significant Changes in Business /Competitive Environment .................................. ............................... 40 CustomerAnalysis ......:........................................................................................ ............................... 42 Financial Performance ......................................................................................... ............................... 45 Edina Liquor Summary............................................................................................................. ............................... 47 BusinessStrategy Update .................................................................................... ............................... 48 Significant Changes in Business /Competitive Environment .................................. ............................... 51 Financial Performance ......................................................................................... ............................... 53 .Edina 20102011 Cost Recovery Goals CITY OF EDINA ENTERPRISE COST RECOVERY 2008 2009 2010 2011 Goal Braemar Arena 83% 85% 85% 85% Braemar Golf Course 104% 103% 97% 100% Centennial Lakes & Edinborough Parks 78% 75% 78% 80% Edina Art Center 68% 69% 71% 70% Edina Aquatic Center 124% 112% 126% 100% Edina Liquor 110% 110% 111% 110% LLJ - - -...r. BRAEMAR ARENA BUSINESS PLAN J 0=20 1 W D m D D m Z D Braemar Arena Summary For hockey and figure skating enthusiasts, Braemar Arena, 7501 Ikola Way, features three indoor, regulation -size ice sheets. Braemar is available for open skating, group rental, adult and youth hockey, figure skating programs and dry floor rentals. The facility also offers group skating lessons for ages 4 through adult and is home to the Braemar -City of Lakes Figure Skating Club, the Edina Hornets hockey teams and the Edina Hockey Association. Four customers account for 75.5 percent of the Arena's income: Edina Hockey Association, 34 percent; Braemar -City of Lakes Figure Skating Club, 25 percent; Minnesota Showcase, 10 percent and Edina High School, 6.5 percent. Braemar Arena employs five full -time and 30 part -time workers. The Edina Hockey Association buys approximately 56 percent of its ice from Braemar; Braemar -City of Lakes Figure Skating Club, 100 percent; Braemar Synchro Team, 75 percent; and Edina High School, 95 percent. In 2010, Braemar Arena was able to recover 85 percent of its operating costs in revenues. Earnings from liquor operations continue to subsidize the arena's annual operating loss. Business Strategy Update Capital Improvements Braemar Arena recently completed a major renovation project at a cost of approximately $2.66 million (funded through the sale of bonds and grants). New floor refrigeration pipes, a new board system and new handicap seating and accessibility to the players' boxes were added in the west arena. New dehumidification units were installed in the east and west arenas. The Braemar Arena staff continually looks for new ways to help make the Arena run as energy efficiently as possible. • New dehumidifiers in East and West Arenas • New snow melt pit that uses waste heat for compressors in West Arena • New sub -floor heating system under the West rink floor Staff cautions against proposals to add additional sheets of ice at Braemar Arena due to the number of indoor facilities in this market. The over supply of ice typically means the prime hour definition shrinks earlier in the evening, resulting in fewer hours sold. (If another local arena has an ice time available at 8 p.m., customers won't buy our 9 p.m.) Concessions The Edina Hockey Association currently operates the concessions stand at Braemar Arena. In exchange, Braemar Arena is paid $10,000 per year. Management will review the current arrangement, as St. Louis BRAEMAR ARENA B R A E M A R A R E N A Park gets 20 percent of sales made by the hockey association there and Bloomington Ice Garden gets $11,000 per year from its hockey association.The City of Eden Prairie operates the concessions stand at its arena and reports profits of $35,000 in 2010. Advertising/ iviarketing Braemar Arena's principal customers continue to be Braemar City of Lakes Figure Skating Club, Edina Hockey Association, Minnesota Showcase Hockey and Edina High School. The most desirable ice times are offered to these customers. These groups represent a significant percentage of our annual revenue. Braemar and other competitive arenas are part of an online system, "Rinkfinder.com." This website is extremely beneficial to arenas such as Braemar in that it allows staff to post ice availability online. Ice reservations and purchasing continue to be accomplished through a follow -up telephone call. Staff feels this website is the most effective way to advertise our available ice times. The use of Rinkfinder is free to member facilities. Skating lessons are advertised through newspaper ads, local schools by fliers and www.Braemar- Arena.com. This has often kept our classes full through the fall — spring seasons. Online registration for skating lessons will be explored in the near future. Pricing Braemar continues to be price- competitive with other public arenas. Since September 2010, our price per hour has been $185. This tends to be within $5 to $10 of other nearby public facilities. Bloomington Ice Garden $185 /hour prime time, $120 /hour non -prime Eden Prairie $190 /hour (no non -prime info provided) St. Louis Park $170 (no non -prime rate offered) Minnetonka $180 (no non -prime rate offered) In today's economy, pricing has become as important as ice availability and location. Braemar Arena's peak season is from September through March. Prime hours are 4 to 10 p.m. Monday through Friday and 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday. Non -prime ice times are 6 a.m. to 4 p.m. and after 10 p.m. Monday through Friday and 6 to 7 a.m. and after 10 p.m. on weekends. Skating class prices vary depending on session length and are listed on all fliers and our website. Prices range from $97 for a 30- minute class to $226 for a one -hour class. BRAEMAR ARENA 2 Significant Changes in Business /Competitive Environment As noted earlier, indoor ice is over supplied in our market. During peak season, Monday, Tuesday and Thursday night prime -time ice can never be supplied in quantities to meet demand. This has led to the perception that ice is in short supply, thus leading to overbuilding which requires increased subsidization. It also leads to users having the luxury of "shopping" other facilities for more desirable ice times. Staff continues to explore other possible revenue streams, including selling more ice during the summer months — offering open hockey and more open skating hours on the weekends and renting ice to the figure skating on Saturdays. In previous years, unless there was a scheduled tournament, the Arena was closed on Saturdays during the summer. Staff is also looking into selling more advertising in the West Arena. Currently, the -Edina Hockey Association sells dasher board ads in the South Arena and the Figure Skating Club in the East Arena. The City receives 25 percent of their net income. We are looking into selling our own ads in the West Arena on the dasher boards. If all ads are sold at $1,000 /ad, we could generate approximately $20,000 per year. St. Louis Park Rink gets 20 percent of ads sold on score board and walls. No dasher board ads are sold. Score Board ads are $2,500 /year, walls $1,500 /year. Bloomington Dasher ads sold by the facility for $1,000 /year. Minnetonka Contracts with sign company that sells the ads for the Arena on a 60 -40 split. (Arena gets 40 percent). Dasher ads are $1,000 /year. Eden Prairie Dasher ads sold by the facility for $950 /year. Break -Even Scenario Management staff was asked to produce a hypothetical break -even operating scenario for the 2010 operating year by adjusting the primary revenue driver on the operating revenue side of the balance sheet. In the case of Braemar Arena, the primary revenue source is the rental of the facilities ice sheets. If the City were to cover the entire 2010 operating deficit at Braemar Arena by adjusting ice rental rates, ice rental rates would need to be increased by 21.8 percent ($40.40 /hour) to $225.40 /hour. The local average rental rate for ice time in our market is $181.25. We cannot predict the precise impact of an increase in our ice rental rates of this magnitude, but given the current market rate for ice rental rates, and given that other ice arenas also have unused capacity to rental more ice, it is probable that total operating revenues could decrease in this scenario because customers for our ice would rent their discretionary ice from other arenas. BRAEMAR ARENA B R A E M A R A R E N A BRAEMAR ARENA Net Income: 2008 -2010 2008 2009 2010 Retail Sales $8,085 $7,718 $6,992 Memberships 3,851 3,716 5,406 Admissions 120,558 111,481 117,843 Building Rental 1,131,385 1,157,522 1,035,429 Equipment Rental 3,136 2,997 1,652 Class Registration & Other Fees 132,584 130,976 134,184 Total Operating Revenues 1,399,599 1,414,410 1,301,506 Operating Expenses: Cost of Goods Sold 1,036 880 1,045 Personnel Services 614,747 654,132 591,912 Contractual Services 671,565 608,683 524,060 Commodities 72,936 73,241 75,679 Central Services 43,343 41,905 41,948 Depreciation 286,033 286,241 292,892 Total Operating Expenses 1,689,660 1,665,082 1,527,536 Operating Income /(Loss) (290,061) (250,672) (226,030) - )erating Revenue /(Expense) Excess Tax Increments - 100,124 - Intergovernmental - - 222,000 Interest and Fiscal Charges (8,354) (5,966) (90,170) Amortization (2,246) (60) (722) Other Miscellaneous - - 20,972 Total Non - Operating Expense (10,600) 94,098 152,080 Loss Before Transfers ($300,661) ($156,574) ($73,950) Non -GAA.P Cash & Investments Reconciliation: Operating Revenues $1,399,599 $1,414,410 $1,301,506 Operating Expenses (1,689,660) (1,665,082) (1,527,536) Non - operating Revenues (Expenses) and transfers 94,400 196,173 348,486 Depreciation 286,033 286,241 292,892 Bond Proceeds - 2,440,000 - Bond Principal (220,000) (225,000) - Capital Expenditures - (136,088) (2,515,947) Other Accruals 20,109 8,146 166,699 Change in Cash & Investments (109,519) 2,318,800 (1,933,900) January 1 Cash & Investments 94,649 (14,870) 2,303,930 December 31 Cash & Investments ($14,870) $2,303,930 $370,030 Note: 2010 financial data is preliminary and unaudited. BRAEMAR ARENA 4 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE Historical Analysis of Subsidies 2010 $80,000 Edina Liquor 2010 $116,406 Capital Improvement Fund 2009 $80,000 Edina Liquor 2009 $22,075 Capital Improvement Fund 2008 $80,000 Edina Liquor 2008 $25,000 Capital Improvement Fund 2007 $80,000 Edina Liquor 2007 $25,000 Capital Improvement Fund 2006 $85,000 Edina Liquor 2006 $25,000 Capital Improvement Fund 2005 $41,000 Edina Liquor 2005 $45,000 Capital Improvement Fund 2004 $103,000 Edina Liquor 2004 $74,430 Capital Improvement Fund 2003 $8,000 Golf Dome 2003 $6,149 Capital Improvement Fund 2002 $90,157 Capital Improvement Fund 2001 $135,000 Edina Liquor 2001 $75,189 Capital Improvement Fund 2000 $81,000 Edina Liquor Note: Subsidy amount is based on cash position of fund, not annual performance. 2008 2009 2010 Percent of operating expenses covered by operating revenues: 83% 85% 85% BRAEMAR ARENA BRAE M A R A R E N A FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE BRAEMAR ARENA Future Debt Payments (2009 West Arena) 2011 $80,000 $84,400 $164,400 2012 100,000 82,600 182,600 2013 100,000 80,600 180,600 2014 100,000 78,350 178,350 2015 100,000 75,725 175,725 2016 105,000 72,775 177,775 2017 105,000 69,625 174,625 2018 110,000 66,262 176,262 2019 110,000 62,550 172,550 2020 115,000 58,613 173,613 2021 120,000 54,200 174,200 2022 125,000 49,300 .174,300 2023 130,000 44,200 174,200 2024 135,000 38,900 173,900 2025 135,000 33,500 168,500 2026 140,000 28,000 168,000 2027 150,000 22,200 172,200 2028 155,000 16,100 171,100 2029 160,000 9,800 169,800 2030 165,000 3,300 168,300 Total $2,440,000 $1,031,000 $3,471,000 BRAEMAR ARENA of E6 Op0 W W D m D W G1 O r T n O C N m B R A E M A R G O L F C O U R S E Braemar Golf Course Summary Braemar Golf Course facilities include three nine -hole regulation courses, two nine -hole executive courses, a driving range, golf dome, pro shop, grill and banquet/ meeting rooms. Between the outdoor facilities and the golf dome, Braemar is open 363 days a year. Braemar is believed to be one of the highest - volume municipal facility in the state. Braemar's league membership has also been the largest in the state, with more than 450 women and 400 men participating. Even though Braemar faces a down economy in a market that is overbuilt, the regulation courses will exceed 60,000 rounds. Braemar's revenues have historically far exceeded expenses. In 2010, Braemar recovered 97 percent of its expenses. The debt service that puts Braemar in a negative cash position is primarily the result of the "new" Clunie nine construction and the Fred Richards executive course which costs included land acquisition. This debt will be retired in 2013, putting the Braemar facilities in a much more favorable financial position while retaining these assets. In an effort to reduce operating expenses, management has eliminated the Assistant Manager /Golf Dome Manager position. Current full -time staffing levels for the maintenance area are down to 6 (from a high of 9). The management area is down to 5 (from a high of 8). A position in each area opened in 2010 and was not filled. Braemar's staff continues to anticipate and adapt business strategies for the ever - changing golf market to grow our customer base and loyalty: • The cost of the non - resident patron card seemed cost prohibitive to many customers last year, so the price has been reduced from $110 to $90. • The golf dome discount cards can now be used at the outdoor range (through mid -May). This increased "late season" sales of the cards at the dome. • The minimum age for juniors on the regulation courses has been lowered two years to age 10 and to age 8 on the executive courses (accompanied by an adult). Staff lowered the group lesson age to 8 also. • Staff constantly works to improve course conditions /playability by more aggressively mowing rough, lowering collar height, and widening approaches to greens. • We have established a reciprocal program for patron cards with Brookview and Baker National golf courses. Our patron card will be valid for the preferred (patron) at the other two courses. Their patron cards will be valid at Braemar all day Mondays and Tuesdays all day and after 1 p.m. on Sundays. �wT �v 7 B R A E M A R G O L F C O U R S E Golf Dome The Braemar Golf Dome is open from approximately Nov. 1 to March 31 each year. Golf domes revenues have been stable, but, like the golf course, the weather is the largest factor. The 2009 -10 season was negatively impacted by good weather, which in turn, helped course revenues. The 2010- 11 season was off to a slow start but will finish strong due to poor weather for outdoor golf (affecting those revenues negatively). Private Rentals The banquet /meeting rooms have shown a slight decline in bookings /revenue with smaller groups comprising more of the rentals: 2008 $70,00 2009 $65,500 158 events 2010 $61,300 151 events Grill Wine is now available at the grill and is purchased through a relationship with Edina Liquor. Wine sales started slow, but are gradually growing. In 2009, Braemar began offering live music on the west deck, boosting beer and wine sales. The operation of the grill and its menu have been studied in the off season. Some enhancements include: • Expanded menu, continually "testing new items," added variety of coffee options • Now selling strong beer, hard lemonade and wine • Bottled beer from beverage cart selling very well • Annual price increases to improve margins, keep up with COGS • Grill POS now able to accept credit cards, ATM onsite • Offering items from outdoor grill on the deck during select times • Expanding live music events on deck • Free Wi -Fi • Eliminated pay phone, installed free courtesy phone J • Upgraded to two large screen TVs Pro Shop The pro shop is positioned to do well in 2011, weather permitting. The shop has added some new club lines at minimal cost. Demo days at the dome proved very successful with the new lines. Year -to -date revenue is up 39 percent. We are working with an outside vendor which will allow us to take trade -ins toward new club purchases. • 2009 Sales $208,184 Margin 27.5% • 2010 Sales $216,219 Margin 23.1% (liquidation of old merchandise affected margin) To maintain Braemar's premier status, future improvements should be considered. However, capital improvements have been put on hold for a number of years due to the financial constraints of debt service from prior improvements, including the purchase of Fred Richards Executive Course and the _JgJ C �' B R A E M A R G O L F C O U R S E expansion at Braemar Golf Course. The Park Board has recommended and approved the commission of a golf consulting firm to review Braemar's operations. Business Strategy Update Capital Improvements Most of Braemar's planned capital improvements have been put on hold for a number of years due to the financial constraints of the debt service from prior improvements, including the purchase of Fred Richards Executive Golf Course and the expansion of Braemar. Capital improvements could include reconfiguring the driving range to increase the length and hitting capacity by 30 to 40 percent (which by necessity will include some reconfiguration of the executive course) and redesigning the new nine to improve playability. The improvements to the Driving Range could be done in phases with minimal income loss with a quick return on investment and more long -term profitability. The ROI on improvements to the new nine would take longer. An outside consultant confirmed the need for these improvements and the increased revenue potential. We are in the process of hiring a consultant to study areas of opportunity. Although the Clubhouse /Grill areas are dated and could use a "facelift," any major renovation or reconstruction would not show a positive return on investment. This would include expansion of the banquet room for increased capacity. Rentals needing a larger room would not offset the investment/ debt service as we are already well booked on the most desired nights. M:ir�pthig /Advertisir _' Braemar continues to be recognized as one of the premier public golf courses in Minnesota. Braemar was recently recognized as one the top 25 facilities in the "Hacker's Guide" which uses "real golfers" to provide ratings for over 283 courses in the area, including every public 18 -hole course in Minnesota. The patron card philosophy has worked well to establish customer loyalty from our residents. Based on this experience, a non - resident patron card has been offered to increase Braemar's core customer base. In 2007, Patron Card revenue was $106,040. In 2008, it was $110,313, and in 2009 it rose to $123,761. The 258 Non - Resident card sales in 2009 offset the decline in Resident card sales. Due to the competitive environment, a more aggressive advertising approach, including television, print, internet, radio spots and outdoor advertising, was implemented for the Golf Dome and the Golf Course in 2009. The southwest metropolitan area has been successfully targeted for promoting the Non - Resident patron card, as that is the obvious primary market. Braemar's staff will continue to move forward with diverse advertising supplemented by internal cross promotion in our various revenue centers and a focus on our own broadcast email marketing. G��Y d EU�9 9 B R A E M A R G O L F C O U R S E 10 ricing of Servic The construction of additional golf courses in the metropolitan area, general economic conditions and the demographics of our customers affect Braemar's pricing structure. Pricing is a particularly important issue to our senior golfers, who display a keen interest in value and who are willing to travel to more distant facilities offering cheaper rates. With the overbuilding of golf in the metropolitan area, we must continue to be particularly sensitive to our price point in the market. Many courses have gone to dramatic discounting, actually pricing their product at less than it costs to offer. We have offered sensible discounts to select groups. We added an "Under Age 25" rate that has brought a number of new faces to our facility. Our "Super Senior" rate (age 75 or older) helps keep players at our course. We have also gained numerous golfers in our leagues and open play who have dropped out of Country Clubs. Significant Changes in Business /Competitive Environmen- Braemar Golf Course continues to provide a premier golf facility in the metropolitan area. Course quality, location and customer service continue to distinguish Braemar from other courses. Notwithstanding these features, Braemar has experienced fluctuations in the number of regulation rounds played during the past few years. The following summarizes regulation rounds played during the past three years: Regulation Courses Executive Course Richards Executive 2008 64,750 22,038 25,875 2009 68,996 22,848 25,965 2010 60,844 18,578 21,965 The variations in rounds are primarily due to weather. The increase in rounds at Richards for 2006 and 2007 appear to come from increased marketing and the non - resident patron card. Patron card revenues: 2008 $110,313 2009 $123,761 2010 $103,235 Again, the reciprocal patron privileges and reduced non - resident card rate should increase sales for 2011. The dome's primary competitor by proximity is the year -round outdoor facility Golf Zone in Chanhassen (which was temporarily closed by flooding in the spring). Future improvements to Braemar's golf facilities are designed to maintain its competitive position. Management has evaluated these improvements for their cost /benefit in light of the above -noted volatility in the golf business and the Golf Course Fund's current negative cash balance. A reconfiguration of the driving range is proposed, but put on hold, to expand the number of tees and improve safety. This B R A E M A R G O L F C O U R S E improvement will encroach into the executive course, which will likewise require some reconfiguration. In 2006, management proposed redesigning several fairways on the new nine (holes 19 -27) to make the course more playable for the average golfer. This improvement is also currently on hold. The current golf environment continues to be competitive and challenging. Braemar, Fred Richards and the Golf Dome remain some of the strongest operations in this weakened marketplace (including other industries). We feel that golf is rebounding and we see "the light at the end of the tunnel" as far as shortly retiring current debt service. It is essential to maintain facilities and aggressively market to maintain market share and have plans and approvals in place to make the proposed improvements as soon as financially possible. Break -Even Scenario Management staff was asked to produce a hypothetical break -even operating scenario for the 2010 operating year by adjusting the primary revenue driver on the operating revenue side of the balance sheet. In the case of Braemar Golf Course, the primary revenue source is the user fee collected by the City in exchange for a round of golf (i.e., "greens fees "). In 2010, there were 101,387 paid rounds of golf sold at the City's municipal golf courses. Approximately 60 percent of those rounds were sold at the regulation golf courses at Braemar and 40 percent were sold at the Braemar and Fred Richards executive courses. The 2010 operating deficit for the golf enterprise was $101,025. If the enterprise were directed to recover 100 percent of its operating deficit through an adjustment only to its primary revenue driver — its greens fees — it could achieve the goal by increasing the average cost of a round of golf by $1. This increase would result in an increase in the cost of a round of golf by 4 percent at Braemar and 12 percent at Braemar and Fred Richards executive courses. In the opinion of management, a user fee increase of this magnitude could be implemented if applied proportionately to average round cost with a high probability of successfully generating the additional revenue needed to achieve the goal of recovering 100 percent of operating expenses with operating revenues. C-dx+T �JgJ �y it 11 B R A E M A R G O L F C O U R S E HNAiNCIAL PERFORIOA SCE BRAEMAR & FRED RICHARDS GOLF COURSES Net Income: 2008 -2010 Note: 2010 financial data is preliminary and unaudited. 12 ���Y d EpNy �x� 2008 2009 2010 Liquor Sales $145,904 $146,632 $144,541 Retail Sales 233,473 212,886 218,585 Concessions 243,848 230,776 213,250 Memberships 110,313 123,761 119,981 Building Rental 85,603 81,728 228,126 Admissions 315,013 264,671 70,726 Rental of Equipment 361,566 359,277 362,763 Greens Fees 1,846,317 1,880,610 1,738,261 Other Fees 338,547 358,333 346,300 Total Operating Revenues 3,680,584 3,658,674 3,442,533 Operating Expenses Cost of Goods Sold 350,320 338,248 328,821 Personnel Services 1,748,175 1,774,558 1,636,091 Contractual Services 559,521 580,479 557,828 Commodities 358,704 323,311 479,783 Central Services 113,474 110,796 116,958 Depreciation 407,186 414,656 424,077 Total Operating Expenses 3,537,380 3,542,048 3,543,558 Operating Income 143,204 116,626 (101,025) Neon- oneratine Re:,enue (Expense) Excess tax increments - 100,124 - Interest and Fiscal Charges (70,763) (34,362) (17,568) Amortization (4,339) (820) (447) Other Miscellaneous 14,505 (9,809) 5,222 Total non - operating Revenue (60,597) 55,133 (12,793) Change in Net Assets $82,607 $171,759 ($113,818) Non -GAAP Cash & Investments Reconciliation: Operating Revenues $3,680,584 $3,658,674 $3,442,533 Operating Expenses (3,537,380) (3,542,048) (3,543,558) Non - operating Revenues (Expenses) and transfers 109,403 225,133 87,207 Depreciation 407,186 414,656 424,077 Bond Principal (510,000) (500,000) (280,000) Capital Expenditures (154,960) (173,180) (173,300) Other Accruals 46,837 16,683 76,897 Change in Cash 41,670 99,918 (119,938) January 1 Cash (1,128,639) (1,086,969) (987,051) December 31 Cash ($1,086,969) ($987,051) ($1,106,989) Note: 2010 financial data is preliminary and unaudited. 12 ���Y d EpNy �x� B R A E M A R G O L F C O U R S E FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE GOLF COURSE FUND CASH POSITION Past 10 Fiscal Years As of Dec. 31 Balance 1999 (345,012) 2000 54,973 2001 (80,966) 2002 79,306 2003 (32,084) 2004 (370,786) 2005 (621,080) 2006 (874,384) 2007 (1,128,639) 2008 (1,086,969) 2009 (987,051) 2010 (1,106,989) GOLF COURSE FUND Fvrtv!ron nPht P ?UrnPntc Mronrl Rirhirds R, Neim Nine) Year Principal Interest Total 2011 280,000 14,700 294,700 2012 285,000 9,050 294,050 2013 310,000 3,100 313,100 Final Debt Payment Total -'50 BRAEMAR & FRED RICHARDS GOLF COURSES Historical Analysis of Subsidies Year Amount 2000 $170,000 2009 $170,075 2010 $100,000 Note: Subsidy amount is I Source Edina Liquor Edina Liquor Edina Liquor used on cash position of fund, not annual performance. 2008 2009 2010 Percent of operating expenses covered by operating revenues: 104% 103% 97% EDP � Gdxr.Ar 9 ��. 13 I 0 1A • a H 4 1 rip A f CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK &hnbomugh Pa& BUSINESS PLAN 2010-2011 M n 0 m Z z W 0 Z ;o Z 0 — c: > r > rri 90 C E N T E N N I A L L A K E S & E D I N B O R O U G H P A R K S Centennial lakes Park Summary Centennial Lakes continues to provide a very unique social recreational experience for Edina residents and visitors. Centennial Lakes, a 24 -acre park and pond, offers the ultimate urban escape. The park features more than 1.S miles of paved pathways meandering around a 10 -acre lake and interspersed with beautifully landscaped grounds, formal and informal seating areas, swinging benches and fountains. During the summer months, visitors can rent paddleboats, fish in the ponds for a variety of game fish, watch remote - control sailboat races, explore the maze, or try their luck on the bent grass putting course or croquet and lawn bowling lawn. The park also hosts a variety of cultural performances in a 1,000 -seat lakeside amphitheater. At the Hughes Pavillion, visitors can rent banquet space for wedding receptions, business meetings and social events. In the winter months, Centennial Lakes Park offers one of the Twin Cities' finest outdoor skating venues. Visitors can skate across 10 acres of carefully maintained ice or take a spin on one of the park's Norwegian ice sleds. Afterwards, guests can relax by one of the Pavilion's three fireplaces while sipping a cup of hot chocolate from the concession stand. For the convenience of park visitors, Centennial Lakes rents figure and hockey skates for children and adults. Putting course revenues, paddle boat rentals, rental of ice skates and private building rentals are the main sources of self - generated revenue. Association fees continue to be the principal revenue source for the park, but are not expected to keep pace with inflation. The association fees are contractual fees that are charged to each of the 10 members of the Centennial Lakes development and are assessed per dwelling unit or leasable square foot. Leasable square footage fees are subject to a yearly increase based on CPI; dwelling units are frozen at $15 per unit. In 2010, Centennial Lakes Association fees totaled $275,000. Operating losses continue, with losses currently being covered out of the park's investment fund balance and adversely effecting the interest income from the fund. Staff includes one full -time manager, one full -time Assistant Manager, one full -time horticulturist, two full -time maintenance supervisors and 18 to 20 part-time seasonal staff. .r 14 CEN I ENNIAL LAKES PARK c r— —o�r —fie n— N A C E N T E N N I A L L A K E S & E D I N B O R O U G H P A R K S Business Strategy Update Capital Improvements The majority of capital improvement dollars continue to be spent maintaining and replacing existing infrastructure and equipment. Paver and concrete replacement are some of the major expenditures planned for the next yew few years, and an additional restroom facility just south of Hughes Pavilion is scheduled to be constructed in 2012. Marketing Since many of the fee -based amenities in the park — specifically the putting course, ice skating rink and weekend rentals — are near capacity during the prime season, the focus of the marketing plan at Centennial Lakes has been on using low -cost means to promote the park to existing park patrons, Centennial Lakes residents and businesses and the greater metropolitan area. These efforts center on the use of brochures, posters and PSAs listings to increase awareness of the park and to remind patrons of the park's amenities. Additional marketing is directed toward promoting the park to first -time users, especially for our summer recreational opportunities and building rentals during off -peak times. Paid advertising includes the Yellow Pages, Wedding Guides, Sun - Current, Edina map and others. We also maintain a strong online presence and make frequent use of City Extra, Facebook and Twitter. Surveys of our patrons have shown that the primary way people have found out about the park is through word -of -mouth or they have attended an event or performance at the park. We strongly believe that if we can get someone to visit the park once, there is a high probability that they will become a repeat visitor and use one of our fee -based amenities. Toward this end, we try to attract people to events at the park such as our concert series, Movies in the Park, theater performances, model boat shows and farmers market. In addition, we are a partner in numerous events such as the Taste of Edina, Fall into the Arts Festival, Candleberry Boutique and Pinstripes Ice Bocce tournament. Pricing of Services The fee -based amenities at Centennial Lakes tend to be priced equal to or slightly higher than comparable amenities at other facilities. Price increases seem to have little effect on the popularity of amenities such as weekend building rentals and ice skates, but there has been some resistance to increases on other amenities. Centennial Lakes Putting Course Centennial Lakes Park* $8 Tournament Greens — Blaine* $6.75 -7.75 Boulder Creek — Chaska* $6.50 -7.50 Links at Dred Scott $5 -7 Adventure Gardens $5 -6.50 Moose Mountain $8 *Bentgrass courses r/\ C.EN I ENNIAL LAKES PARK c i i t 0 r E 0 PaA 1 N A C E N T E N N I A L L A K E S & E D I N B O R O U G H P A R K S Paddleboats Centennial Lakes Park Three Rivers Parks Minneapolis Parks Ice Skate Rental Centennial Lakes Park Braemar Arena John Rose Oval The Depot $8 for 1 /2hr. $6 for 1 /2hr. $17 for 1 hr. $5 $2 (plus $4 admission) $4 (plus $5 admission) $7 (plus $6 -8 admission) Hughes Pavilion Rental Comparable pricing for the rental of the Hughes Pavilion is somewhat difficult due to the uniqueness of the facility and the desires of rental clients. It is our belief that our rental fees be placed toward the top of what the market will bear. Hughes Pavilion Bloomington Center for the Arts Burnsville Performing Arts Center $225/4 hours Monday- Thursday $995/6 hours Friday- Saturday $350/4 hours Sunday $218/3 hours 5 -10 p.m. Monday- Thursday $272/3 hours 8 a.m. -10 p.m. Friday, Saturday, Sunday $2,175 Full Day $975/8 hours City of Minnetonka Banquet Room Resident $225 -500 Non - Resident $325 -750 Minnetonka -based public agency $100 -275 Non - Minnetonka -based public agency $150 -325 Dakota Lodge (West St. Paul) $225/6 hours 7 a.m. -10 p.m. Monday- Friday $1,000 Weekend Basic Events $1,450 Weekend Deluxe Events Significant Changes in Business /Competitive Environment Centennial Lakes continues to be an exceptional venue in the metropolitan area. Studies have found that approximately 80 percent of park patrons come from outside Edina, making it a true desination park. In addition, the recent community opinion survey listed Centennial Lakes as the facility most heavily used by Edina residents. The uniqueness of the park and its recreational and social offerings are major factors in this popularity. The Centennial Lakes putting course continues to do well, although user numbers have remained relatively constant. Although we are currently the highest - priced miniature golf course in the state, we will recommend a price increase for 2012 as we feel that the market can bear this increase and it is somewhat E __ CEN I ENNIAL Fk4nbo j]Q'�'] Park LAKES PARK c ; .' -ro -�F o I - : C E N T E N N I A L L A K E S & E D I N B O R O U G H P A R K S overdue. The last putting course increase was in 2006. Paddleboat rentals remain popular and additional boats will be purchased for the coming season. Croquet and lawn bowling are underutilized. In 2010, only 254 hours of croquet courts and 465 hours of lawn bowling courts were rented. However, both amenities have an appeal to business groups and contribute to our building rentals for company outings. Staff is researching the possibility of serving beer and wine at the lawn games area as this would greatly increase the appeal of this area to business groups and individuals. The addition of Pinstripes Bowling, Bocce & Bistro on the north end of the park might also give our lawn games area some added business as their customers look for an outdoor alternative. The Hughes Pavilion is a popular option for wedding receptions, business meetings and banquets. Even with weekend rates approaching $1,000, the facility is in high demand during the core May- October season, although opportunities do exist for increased revenues during off -peak dates. We will propose a 10 percent increase in weekend rental fees for 2012 due to the popularity of this venue. The Maetzold Amphitheater at Centennial Lakes Park hosts almost 100 performances each summer in the areas of music, dance and theater. Although these performances are complimentary, they are one of the major draws of the park and help solidify its standing as a major community gathering spot. A weekly "Movies in the Park" series has been extremely popular with all ages. In 2010, over 16,000 people attended the inaugural Centennial Lakes farmers market held on Thursdays from 3 to 7 p.m. with 25 vendors participating. The 2011 market will be expanded by two weeks and up to 35 vendors. While not a major money maker, the market was able to make a profit of over $2,600 in its first year and was able to provide the community with an abundance of fresh goods and produce. The Centennial Lakes ice rink is the park's major winter draw, but attendance and revenues are very much dependent upon the weather. Despite the extreme weather of the past few years, the rink has had the top three revenue - producing seasons in its history, primarily due to increasing the skate rental inventory by 40 percent. Centennial Lakes Park staff has also taken on the responsibility of operating and maintaining the Edina Promenade, a landscaped greenway at the north edge of the park that serves as the backdrop for numerous outdoor sculptures and works of art. icenahu Management staff was asked to produce a hypothetical break -even operating scenario for the 2010 operating year by adjusting the primary revenue driver on the operating revenue side of the balance sheet. In the case of Centennial Lakes Park, the primary revenue source is the association fee charged to the residential and commercial properties that comprise the Centennial Lakes development. 1 17 CEN I ENNIAL &i;„ 0pugh ¢a� LAKES PARK c I• O f , p IuN C E N T E N N I A L L A K E S & E D I N B O R O U G H P A R K S Association fees account for 40 percent of the operating revenues of Centennial Lakes Park. Sixty percent of the operating revenue is generated by user fees and facility rentals. The Centennial Lakes Park operating deficit for 2010 is estimated to be $153,459. The primary revenue driver at Centennial Lakes -- Association Fees -- is governed by the Centennial Lakes development agreement. The association fees for residential properties are frozen at their current rate of $15 per unit /month. Association fees for commercial space are tied to the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Because the primary revenue driver in this case is relatively inelastic revenue source, management staff analyzed the potential to recover operating expenses by adjusting the park's user fees and facility rental charges. In order to recover 100 percent of Centennial Lakes 2010 operating deficit through an adjustment to user fees and facility rental costs, it would require an average increase of 40 percent across- the -board in these revenue sources. This would require increases to the cost of a round of golf from $8 to $11.20, skate rental from $5 to $7, paddleboat rental from $8/30 minutes to $11.20/30 minutes and the Hughes Pavilion from $225 /four hours to $315 /four hours. Increasing these user fees and facility rental costs by 40 percent would push our cost structure significantly higher than our market competitors in most cases. Management believes there is a moderate risk of this strategy failing to generate additional total revenue as current price sensitive customers would look for other less costly venues to spend their discretionary leisure dollars. f — n#111 CENT ENNIAL FAinborotw_h LAKES PARK C I T Y 0 r c o i N A 18 C E N T E N N I A L L A K E S & E D I N B O R O U G H P A R K S With more than 6,000 plants, trees and flowers, Edinborough Park is Minnesota's unique indoor public park. The completely enclosed, one -acre park features a junior - Olympic size swimming pool, a running track and fitness area, a huge indoor playground and a multi - purpose room and play area, all connected by meandering pathways through the densely landscaped interior. In its 250 -seat, Greek -style amphitheater, Edinborough Park presents a full schedule of free cultural arts programs in the areas of music, dance, theater and visual arts from September to May of each year. Edinborough Park continues to provide a unique recreational experience for Edina and its visitors. Edinborough Park employs the following seven full -time positions: Four Building Operations Supervisors, Horticulturist, Assistant Manager and Manager. In addition, we employ approximately 12 part-time staff at our Park Office /Guest Services Counter and two part-time Maintenance staff. With the addition of a Concessions Stand, we plan to employ approximately eight part-time Concessions staff. Only one full -time position has been modified since the change to the fee -based Playpark concept in 2003. The full -time Special Events Coordinator changed to an Assistant Manager position. Maintenance staffing levels, both full and part time have remained the same. With the addition of our Birthday Party program and Adventure Peak, Guest Services staffing has approximately doubled since 2003. Playpark admissions, birthday parties and season passes are the main sources of self - generated revenue. Association fees charged to residents and businesses in the Edinborough area continue to be a principal revenue source for the park, but are not expected to keep pace with inflation. Operating losses continue, with losses currently being covered out of the parks' investment balance, which adversely affects interest income. 2010 operating revenues were sufficient to cover 78% of Edinborough's operating expenses. Business Strategy Update Capital Improvements A change in philosophy to charge admission to Edinborough Park and the addition of the Adventure Peak play structure in 2003 have greatly increased the appeal of Edinborough Park to Edina residents and metropolitan families and have dramatically increased park admission revenues. 2010 revenues were up $500,000 from revenues in 2001, and up $489,000 from 2002, prior to addition of Adventure Peak and the " Playpark" concept. These figures include the cost of goods sold. To better meet the needs of our customers, provide better security for the Park's resources, staff and customers, and to generate significant additional revenues, staff recommends several changes to the facility be explored. Staff proposes to hire an architect and engineering consultants to 19 CLN I LNNIAL �+ Pa& LAKES PARK c— r - 0 E D i N A C E N T E N N I A L L A K E S & E D I N B O R O U G H P A R K S complete a feasibility study and make recommendations for a variety of proposed significant facility improvements, including: 1. Park Office and Guest Services Counter relocation 2. Upper -Level Concessions Stand and seating area expansion 3. Track and Fitness Area expansion and /or space re- utilization 4. Pool cost analysis and possible space re- utilization 5. Lower -level locker room expansion or conversion to "family" restrooms for Playpark 6. Increased Storage 7. Improved Administrative Offices 8. Accessibility to Track and Fitness Area 9. Additional party rental space The following is a description of park improvement needs and alternatives that staff recommends as part of a comprehensive feasibility study. Park Office /Guest Services /Concessions The current admissions office is significantly undersized and is in the wrong location to effectively, efficiently and securely serve paying customers. Would -be paying customers often leave the park after they first walk in because the long lines give them the false impression that the park is over - crowded. Estimates show that in 2010, more than 217,000 people visited the Playpark, 47,000 people visited the Pool /Track and over 26,000 attended birthday parties at the Park. Edinborough scheduled more than 1,240 birthday parties in 2010. This totals an estimated 264,000 people who checked in at the Park Office and an estimated 26,000.birthday party customers who checked into a "birthday party table" that was created to avoid further overcrowding of the Park Office. An additional 15,000 attend cultural performances in the Amphitheater annually. A busy winter day can easily attract 3,000 people to the Park Office, creating long lines and congestion. Staff believes that the best and least expensive option would be to remove two plant beds between the main staircase and the amphitheater and construct a guest services counter to sell admissions and birthday parties and also provide a permanent check -in location for birthday parties. The existing Park Office could then be converted to the concession stand. A concession stand with seating area is estimated to generate between $100,000 and $150,000 in net revenues annually for the Park, in addition to meeting a primary need of our customers. The Park currently generates $23,800 in commissions from snack and beverage vending companies and $7,500 from the sale of ice cream in the Park Office. There is a small deli located in the Corporate Center, but they are only open from 9 a.m. to 2 p.m. Monday through Friday and cater primarily to adults and Corporate Center tenants. We provide vending machines for snacks and beverages on the lower level, plus ice cream products sold at the Park Office on the upper level. As a result, the majority of our customers bring in food from home or have to leave the complex to get fast food. Ice cream sales are limited due to long lines at the Park Office. A portable concessions stand was considered, but ruled out because of a lack of access to water and sewer outlets. CEN I ENNIAL �jnbQ E LAKES PARK c i— v— O F o PaA i M. C E N T E N N I A L L A K E S & E D I N B O R O U G H P A R K S Track and Fitness Area Edinborough Park currently has a 1/16 -mile, three -lane indoor track with exercise equipment tucked into the corners on the east and west ends. The area includes two elliptical machines, two treadmills, two recumbent bikes, two upright bikes, a multi- station weight machine, ab bench and a rower. In order to accommodate more people and relieve the crowded conditions, the track could be lengthened and an aerobic equipment and weight room could be added. According to the most recent Park & Recreation Department Needs Assessment Study, Edina residents are interested in more indoor and outdoor walking venues. Land is available for this type of expansion to the north of the existing pool and track. Youth - specific fitness equipment could also be added to attract preteen and teenagers to exercise while combating youth obesity. The existing track floor is 20 years old and is in need of replacement in the next five years. Another option would be to keep the existing floor plan of the track, but eliminate the walking track and use the floor space for additional aerobic and weight equipment. If this option was to be chosen, the floor replacement could be delayed for many years. Adding treadmills, elliptical and bikes would be a more user - friendly alternative to the current short, small, sloped walking /running track. However, staff believes that it will continue to be difficult to compete for fitness customers with the Southdale YMCA, LA Fitness on France Avenue and Lifetime Fitness in Bloomington, all located within two miles of Edinborough. Accessibility to Track and Exercise Equipment Area Currently, there are five steps on a five -foot wide walkway and stairway leading to the Track and Fitness Area, making it difficult or impossible for seniors and people with canes or walkers to access the Track and Fitness Area. A person in a wheelchair must contact the Park Office to have staff walk with him or her outside and provide access via an outside door to the track area. We have customers in wheelchairs and others with mobility challenges who request access to the track area. The track entrance is in the northeast corner of the Park, adjacent to the water heater closet, restrooms and Park Office. This is a challenging accessibility issue that needs a permanent solution. Pool Renovation The pool shell is in need of resurfacing and the tile floor and walls in the pool area are in need of replacement. There is currently $70,000 planned in the Capital Improvement Plan in the year 2011 for pool resurfacing and $80,000 for deck and wall tile in 2013. Staff has been patching the pool surface and repairing deck and wall tile for many years. The pool shell and tile are from the original construction in 1987. As the summer deadline approaches for resurfacing, staff recommends that decision makers consider the long -term desire to financially support pool operations. Lower -Level Locker Rooms The existing locker rooms are grossly undersized, have poor drainage and poor ventilation. The changing areas in both locker rooms can accommodate just three or four people comfortably at one time, making it difficult for Edina Community Education classes, Edina Swim Club and all of the Park's regular fitness customers. The hallway from the pool to the locker rooms is long and cold and the Park has no "family" locker rooms. When families come to the Park I 21 C EN I LNNIAL E6 ufzh Park LAKES PARK c . ,- F o- i ti . C E N T E N I A L L A K E S & E D I N B O R O U G H P A R K S needing family locker facilities, staff gives them access to a dressing room in the employee area of the Park next to the Manager's office. This is also the same space that we hope to use to relocate our Birthday Party Coordinator when she loses her office space in the Concessions Stand renovation. There are also no showers in the dressing room and customers are forced to walk through the Park in their swimming suits. Storage Indoor and outdoor storage is needed for supplies and equipment. The Park was built with very limited storage. The Park's primary storage room is located adjacent to the pool and is very warm with high humidity in a corrosive environment. As part of the feasibility study, more indoor and outdoor storage should be part of the analysis. The addition of concessions will significantly increase our storage demands. We have no storage space for outdoor grounds maintenance equipment. The following is a description of additional miscellaneous equipment and facility repairs, replacements and additions. Adventure Peak Adventure Peak is designed for children ages 2 to 12. There is a small toddler area in the structure and also an inflatable jumper specifically designated for children 5 and under. The upper levels of the play structure are intimidating for many kids under the age of 4 or 5, especially when the Park is very busy. The majority of our customers have children under the age of 5 and are requesting more play space designated specifically for kids ages 1 to 5. We plan to renovate the toddler area of Adventure Peak in 2011. This will more than double the toddler area of Adventure Peak, create a unique seating area for parents and provide new play amenities for our youngest guests. Staff will continue to research and provide new and fresh ideas for this space. Soft Play To continue to meet the need for more toddler activities, staff is recommending the addition of "soft play" in the Great Hall. This is geared toward preschoolers and would provide a safe and secure "enclosed" location for kids to play and explore, while providing caregivers an opportunity to relax and watch their kids play in a comfortable environment. Mini Golf There is also potential for adding an indoor mini golf course as an amenity for our customers. This is a concept that could be considered as part of an upper -level expansion or track renovation project. 2009 HVAC and Pool Ventilation Replacement In 2009 we replaced the original rooftop heating and air conditioning units and pool ventilation systems. We are saving over $40,000 per year in energy with these energy saving replacements based on our 2007, 2008 and 2009 energy costs. This investment has reduced our heating costs by 30 percent. Funding Alternatives There are limited funding alternatives for the proposed large expansion projects. One option is to use the remaining Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Park investment fund balance, which currently has a balance of approximately $3 million. The original concept was to rely on interest earnings from the 22 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK c i I 1 ro e o i H A C E N T E N N I A L L A K E S & E D I N B O R O U G H P A R K S trust fund to help offset operating expenses. Over 50 percent of the trust fund's principal has been used over the past 20 years to cover operational expenses that have been in excess of revenues. By using the fund principal balance, even less interest earnings will be available to offset operational expenses. Staff continues to explore new additional revenues and operational efficiencies to come closer to a financially self- sufficient operation. Without an investment fund principal to rely on to cover our annual operating deficit the Park operations will then have to rely on a K- tax subsidy to sustain. There are a number of park improvements that would increase revenues, such as a concessions stand, soft play and renovated fitness facilities. Without continually making new improvements or correcting existing known issues, the revenue stream will plateau and begin to decrease each year while operating expenses climb. A steady capital improvement plan budget is critical to the long -term financial success of the park. Vlarketir Surveys of Park customers show that 80 percent of clients heard about Edinborough Park by attending a prior event /party at the Park or by word of mouth. Birthday parties have been a steadily growing business and we have utilized the Sun Newspapers, Town Planner Calendars and our website as primary marketing outlets. We started to use Facebook in 2010. Very little marketing for the Play Park, including Adventure Peak, has been done or has been necessary due to the word -of- mouth advertising in the community. The Edinborough Park website continues to be very popular and staff uses it extensively to market events, programs, schedules and amenities. Staff will use the City's existing communications vehicles, including "City Extra" and newsletters, and is looking forward to aggressively utilizing Facebook to market birthday parties, concerts, events, fitness opportunities and daily Playpark activities. There is great potential to grow the business during the summer months and staff believes that group visits are a profitable and cost effective method to bring customers to the Park. Group visits are similar to birthday parties in that one host brings several potentially new customers to the Park, who will have a great time and want to bring their parents back for a return visit. Pricing of Services Playpark With play amenities and unique environments, Edinborough Park is priced in the mid- to upper -price range compared to the competition. The prices of the competition are all in the $4.50 to $5.50 range, but only include the play structure. Our facility provides an even better value with the Great Hall as a very popular amenity. Edinborough Park /Adventure Peak $6 New Brighton /Eagles Nest $6 Maple Grove /Maple Maze $5 Eagan /Blast $5 Woodbury /Lookout Ridge $5.50 Shoreview $4.50 Eden Prairie $4.50 I 23 _J# CLN I LNNIAL E+ch bo]Qi Rj� LAKES PARK -,:o jo-� F o H C E N T E N N I A L L A K E S & E D I N B O R O U G H P A R K S Pool /Track It is more difficult to provide rates for comparable facilities for our fitness area, which includes the pool and track. Most community centers offer full - service fitness centers with classes and many also include an indoor water park, splash pool or something similar. Daily individual admissions for community centers are as follows: Eden Prairie $8 daily; $34 monthly New Brighton $5 daily; $250 annually Maple Grove $6.50 daily; $185 annually (not fitness equipment) Shoreview $8.25 daily; $286 annually Eagan $10 daily; $35 monthly Chaska $6.25 daily; $293 annually Season Passes and Punch Cards Edina residents prefer to purchase season passes because of affordable pricing and a convenient location. Fifty -five percent of our Adventure Peak season pass holders are Edina residents, while 88 percent of pool and track members are residents. This totals 141 Adventure Peak season pass holders and 409 (including Edinborough Association) pool and track members who are Edina residents. We also sell 10 Admission Value Passes for our regular park patrons. In 2010, we sold 1,890 Value Passes for the Playpark. We recorded 14,303 visits from the sale of these passes. We sold 367 Pool/ Track 10 Admission Value Passes. We recorded 3,069 visits from the sale of these passes. Significant Changes in Business /Competitive Environment Adventure Peak has continued to exceed expectations both in terms of visitors and revenues. 2004 and 2005 Playpark admission revenues exceeded $365,000. 2006 revenues exceeded $425,000, 2007 revenues exceeded $450,000 2008 revenues exceeded $525,000 and 2009 revenues exceeded $563,000 and in 2010 revenues exceeded $567,000 There was a concern that once the "uniqueness" of Adventure Peak wore off, numbers would level or slowly decline. Attendance and revenues have continued to increase since the opening in 2003. Park staff recommends periodic improvements to Adventure Peak and the Great Hall in order to add new and exciting amenities to keep it fresh. $30,000 was invested in improvements to Adventure Peak in 2006 and $50,000 was invested in 2008. $25,000 will be invested in improvements to the Toddler area in 2011. Other improvements are recommended to increase revenues, provide a better customer experience and improve overall Park safety and security. Edinborough Park continues to be a facility that provides recreational opportunities for people of all ages. While Adventure Peak and The Great Hall Playpark are attractive to young families, it is also a great outlet for grandparents and parents just looking for an exciting family activity. The Amphitheater offers programming for adults on Sunday evenings. The big bands and smaller group entertainment appeals to people of all ages, particularly adults. Entertainment for children is offered at noon on I 24 CEN I ENNIAL �]��] LAKES PARK c i i -- r— O F fie o f m. C E N T E N N I A L L A K E S & E D I N B O R O U G H P A R K S Thursdays in the amphitheater. We also offer popular family events at Halloween and on New Year's Eve. The long -range business plan is to utilize the Great Hall as a multi - purpose facility for a variety of recreation uses. The plan is to use the Great Hall as a fun and safe play space for primarily young children ages 1 to 12 and their supervising adults. New portable play amenities will routinely be introduced to keep the Playpark fresh and exciting. We also hope to add soft play in the Great Hall to attract even more pre - school age kids. Currently, Edinborough Park attracts guests from all over the state and even the upper Midwest. Groups travel over an hour to spend the day at the Park. Guests from outside of Minnesota choose to stay at the adjacent Marriott Residence Inn because of the amenities the Park offers. Edinborough hosts over 105,000 youth visits annually for the recreational, social, educational and physical activities offered at Edinborough. Birthday Parties ' In 2009, Birthday Parties generated $134,000 and in 2010, they generated $146,000. In 2010, we hosted 1241 birthday parties with an average of 20 guests per party or approximately 24,820 total party attendees. It is difficult to compare birthday party package prices. Some facilities provide cake and other refreshments. The following are packages /facilities.that are most comparable to ours: Adventure Package Peak Package Edinborough $130; $9 per additional child Edinborough $80; $7 per additional child New Brighton $112; $14 per additional child New Brighton $72; $9 per additional child Shoreview $13 per additional child Maple Grove $100; $5 per additional Eagan $125; $12.50 per child Eagan $75; $5 per additional Eden Prairie $129 Woodbury $80; $8 per additional child Woodbury $80; $8 per additional child In 2010, we created a new birthday party brochure and party invitations. In 2011, we plan to add an on -site marketing and party check in station as part of the new guest service counter. We are also planning to provide two new birthday party add -ons, thank -you notes and a group photo opportunity. Staff is exploring costs associated with providing a photo of the birthday group in an Edinborough Park "frame" for the kids to take home as a memory of the party, and as a marketing piece for the Park. It is also worthy to mention that the Park's initial revenue forecasts for Adventure Peak's daily admissions were originally estimated at $220,000 per year. For the third year in a row, the park is: exceeding $525,000 per year in revenues for Playpark admissions. Adventure Peak's daily admissions statistics suggest that Adventure Peak is not just a trend or flash in the pan, but by all indications will continue to increase in popularity simply by word of mouth. Continuing to provide new and exciting improvements will go a long way to keep daily admissions strong and profitable. CENTENNIAL Rfinb — LAKES PARK c i i -- F , n i n A C E N T E N N I A L L A K E S & E D I N B O R O U G H P A R K S Customer Analysis: 2007 -2010 Edinborough Playpark season pass customers comprise 55 percent Edina residents, 18 percent Minneapolis, 11 percent Bloomington, 7 percent Minnetonka, 4 percent Richfield and 5 percent from other communities. Pool and Track season pass holders are 88 percent Edina residents (58 percent if Association members are not included), 13 percent Minneapolis, 3 percent Richfield, 18 percent Bloomington, and 6 percent miscellaneous cities. These percentages have remained consistent for several years. Based on the results of the most recent Park Survey, 13 percent of Playpark customers are Edina residents. The City of New Brighton's Eagles Nest provides the closest comparison to Edinborough Park in terms of amenities /play structure, birthday parties and customer count. In 2010, 19 percent of Eagle's Nest customers came from their zip code, which includes Mounds View, Arden Hills and New Brighton. Woodbury's Lookout Ridge has approximately 39 percent resident.use. Maple Grove's Maple Maze has approximately 41 percent resident use and Shoreview's Tropical Adventures indoor playground has approximately 55 percent resident use. Shoreview and Maple Grove are not very good comparables, however, due to their extensive community centers and waterpark amenities. Our centralized and convenient location helps us to attract customers from the region. Adventure Peak is also the largest and best play structure in Minnesota and one of the largest in the United States. Edinborough hosts concerts in the amphitheater during the months of September through May. Concert attendance averages 1,500 people per month for our Thursday noon and Sunday night concert series. Since these concerts are free, we have no residency information for these events. Tuesday night concerts were drawing low attendance (an average of 5 — 10 customers per concert). Due to the low attendance and budget cuts, these performances were eliminated in 2010. We are currently experimenting with offering Tuesday evenings for groups to perform for free, instead of receiving our typical stipend of $150. Break -Even Scenario Management staff was asked to produce a hypothetical break -even operating scenario for the 2010 operating year by adjusting the primary revenue driver on the operating revenue side of the balance sheet. In the case of Edinborough Park, the primary revenue source is general admissions to the Park, which account for 61 percent of Edinborough's annual operating revenue. The Edinborough Park operating deficit for 2010 is estimated to be $348,043. Because of the operational linkage among the respective operating revenue streams at this facility, the hypothetical break -even analysis considered an adjustment to more than just the primary revenue driver. Our analysis shows that a 50 percent increase in the cost of our general admissions fee, season ticket fee, Ten -Punch Pass fee, and Birthday Party fees would increase our operating revenues by $363,000 — given no change in consumption of those services at the higher rates by our customers. A 50 percent increase in these user fees would increase the cost of a general admission from $6 to $9, the cost of the Adventure Peak birthday party package from $130 to $195, and the cost of a Ten -Punch Pass from $50 to $75. In the judgment of management, increases of this magnitude, particularly in the birthday party packages, would place our cost structure significantly higher than our competitors. There is a high risk that this strategy would not generate the theoretical increase in total revenues as price sensitive families would seek lower cost venues for their leisure experiences. I �' 26 CEN I ENNIAL rr������r1��u,,� LAKES PARK c i I r O F E D I N C, C E N T E N N I A L L A K E S & E D I N B O R O U G H P A R K S 27 CENTENNIAL LAKES & EUMOROUGH PARKS Net Income: 2008 -2010 (Vote: 2010 financial data is preliminary and unaudited CEN I LNNIAL FxhrborqugJi Park LAKES PARK C i, 0 F o i �. 2008 2009 2010 Concessions $56,643 $59,413 $64,402 Memberships 56,051 57,078 52,515 Admissions 526,597 563,966 569,591 Building Rental 272,711 240,489 269,352 Equipment Rental 92,324 103,761 129,407 Greens Fees 177,109 215,710 176,124 Class Registration & Other Fees 484,487 483,640 498,486 Total Operating Revenues 1,665,922 1,724,057 1,759,877 Operating Expenses: Cost of Goods Sold 54,848 51,904 56,382 Personnel Services 1,146,551 1,196,568 1,226,239 Contractual Services 486,910 530,599 445,342 Commodities 264,006 281,532 264,634 Central Services 83,355 79,145 81,889 Depreciation 102,725 148,125 193,762 Total Operating Expenses 2,138,395 2,287,873 2,268,248 Operating Income /(Loss) (472,473) (563,816) (508,371) Nan -0,- sting Revenue /(Expense) Investment Income 382,007 74,728 147,300 Other Miscellaneous Revenue - 2,250 - Total Non - Operating Revenue 382,007 76,978 147,300 Change in Net Assets ($90,466) ($486,838) (361,071) Non -GAAP Cash & Investments Reconciliation: Operating Revenues $1,665,922 $1,724,057 $1,759,877 Operating Expenses (2,138,395) (2,287,873) (2,268,248) Non - operating Revenues (Expenses) and transfers 382,007 326,978 270,671 Depreciation 102,725 148,125 193,762 Capital Expenditures (480,113) (582,631) (257,410) Other Accruals 231,225 (156,626) 39,806 Change in Cash & Investments (236,629) (827,970) (261,542) January 1 Cash & Investments 4,187,649 3,951,020 3,123,050 December 31 Cash & Investments $3,951,020 $3,123,050 $2,861,508 (Vote: 2010 financial data is preliminary and unaudited CEN I LNNIAL FxhrborqugJi Park LAKES PARK C i, 0 F o i �. C E N T E N N I A L L A K E S & E D I N B O R O U G H P A R K S FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE- CENTENNIAL LAKES & EDINBOROUGH PARKS Historical Analysis of Subsidies 1999 $206,000 General Fund 2000 $108,000 General Fund 2001 $46,000 General Fund 2001 $56,300 Construction Fund 2002 $54,343 Construction Fund 2003 $277,201 Construction Fund 2004 $98,000 Construction Fund 2005 0 2006 0 2007 0 2008 0 2009 $250,000 Construction Fund 2010 $123,371 Construction Fund Note: Subsidy amount is based on cash position of fund, not annual performance. 2008 2009 2010 Percent of operating expenses covered by operating revenue: 78% 75% 78% I 2�8 CENTENNIAL FAnboroLiWa Palk LAKES PARK C i 1 0 F E D I N. C E N T E N N I A L L A K E S & E D I N B O R O U G H P A R K S FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES & EDINBOROUGH PARKS FUND 2001 $4,645,867 2002 $4,645,867 2003 $4,717,721 2004 $4,658,390 2005 $4,525,304 2006 $4,371,402 2007 $4,156,959 2008 $3,936,326 2009 $3,121,305 2010 $2,869,114 CENTENNIALj�]b �]Qh LAKES PARK c i i -- r - 0 fr F o i N A e-N l BUSINESS PLAN 20 n,n-20 m v z D D -i n m z -1 m E D I N A A R T C E N T E R Edina Art Center Summary The Edina Art Center, located one mile west of Southdale Center at 4701 W. 64th St., provides the community with a place to enjoy art and a chance to learn how to create it. Staff The Art Center has one full -time Director, six part-time office staff, a full -time Program and Gallery Coordinator, a part-time Media Studios Manager (since 1998), approximately 35 instructors and more than 40 volunteers. The part-time staff consists of a bookkeeper, office manager, pottery studio manager, clay /facilities maintenance, workshop coordinator, schedule editor, event coordinator, publicity coordinator, and general registration and membership data entry. In 2010, the Art Center's main office and gift shop hours of operation were reduced. These areas are now open until 8 p.m. instead of 9:30 p.m. Monday through Thursday, saving more than 300 staff hours. Approximately $3,500 will be saved per year. Although some classes run through 9:30 p.m., an instructor is responsible for checking doors and setting the alarm system. Students are asked to make any purchases in the gift shop or supply area before 8 p.m. The full -time Gallery and Program Manager's hours were restructured to take on some of the duties of a part-time office person who was not replaced. Approximately 50 hours per month, or 600 hours per year, were cut with a savings of $7,000. Volunteers are relied on more heavily than ever before. Volunteers come in nearly every day and do everything from filing to cleaning to fundraising. Classes The Edina Art Center offers classes and workshops for all ages and abilities, beginning at birth when young children attend with their parents to the professional artist who is still learning and growing through excellent faculty members. Although the Art Center's emphasis is on fine arts, several classes in the craft area are offered, such as papermaking, jewelry, tie -dye and painting on wearable arts. Watercolor is one of the Art Center's most popular media. Classes are also offered in portraiture, realistic painting and drawing, pastels, acrylics, landscapes, life drawing, porcelain painting, oils, pottery, design, bookmaking, sculpture, mask - making, architecture and more. Art for All Ages workshops were started 20 years ago. In Art for All Ages, children are placed in workshops with adults. Using the one -room schoolhouse type of learning, these workshops have been some of the Art Center's most popular offerings. We have had classes where grandparents have come in with their grandchildren. 30 E D I N A A R T C E N T E R The Art Center's number of registration continues to climb slightly. In 1991, enrollment was 1,600 registrations per year. In 1999, this figure had increased to 6,500 and in 2006, 7,200 registrations. By 2009, approximately 8,300 registrations were taken. With an emphasis on individualized, guided education, the Art Center's classes for young people are limited to eight students for the preschool and kindergarten classes and 12 for the first through eighth grade. Adult classes vary according to media. Edina Art Center's Board of Directors The Edina Art Center Board of Directors consists of 11 members appointed by the Edina City Council. They work in an advisory capacity to the City Council. The Board's duties are to make recommendations regarding the operation of the Edina Art Center, plan and recommend to the Council art activities and programs, develop a long -term plan directed toward fulfilling the needs and desires of Edina residents with respect to the arts, recommend programs at the Edina Art Center that are responsive to community desires, periodically report to the Council on matters pertaining to the Art Center and public art in Edina, initiate and oversee fundraising activities that benefit the Art Center and public art in Edina, represent the City at community functions pertaining to the visual arts and with similar bodies and organizations involved with the visual arts, oversee the development and implementation of a public visual arts program in Edina and perform other duties from time to time as directed by the Council. Beginning in the fall of 2010, the Art Center welcomed two new student members from Edina High School to the Board. They worked on a new self portrait exhibit for teens from Edina High School which opened Feb. 24. Edina Public Art The Edina Public Art Committee (EPAC) is a committee of the Edina Art Center Board. The purpose of the Edina Public Art Committee is to promote the public's awareness and enjoyment of community spaces within the City via visual artistic enhancement with two- and three - dimensional pieces of art. One -fourth of the proceeds from the Taste of Creativity fundraiser on Nov. 4, 2010, went directly to public art in Edina. The committee is also working on a possible bronze sculpture as a tribute to Kodiak and all police dogs. It is possible that this sculpture will be funded by the Crime Prevention Fund. Membership Memberships steadily increased until 2007, growing from 324 members in 1986 to more than 1,100 in 2007. Membership from 2007 to 2010 remained steady at between 1,100 and 1,250. Memberships are valid for one year from the date of purchase. Family memberships include parents and all children under 18. Benefits include invitations to openings and special events, discounts on classes of at least 10 percent, 10 percent reduction on supplies, place to meet and exchange ideas with other art enthusiasts, entry into the annual Members' Juried Show and use of Art Center studios when space is available. Grants are available to any students who have the need through the generosity of the Peggy Kelly Family Fund, Pat Van Valkenburg Children's Scholarship Fund and the Golden Kiwanis. The scholarship grant requests have grown steadily in the past few years. E D I N A A R T C E N T E R Arts and Healthcare In 2010, the Edina Art Center joined the Midwest Arts in Healthcare Network. Two staff members attended the International Society of Arts in Healthcare conference in Minneapolis. Greer Garden Thanks to private donations and our capital improvement funds, the first phase of the Greer Garden was complete in June of 2010. This area is now a joy to our students and visitors throughout the summer and fall. You will often see folks painting or having their lunch on the deck. Plans for future capital improvements include a better grade of permeable ground cover. BuSiI"iw Capital Improvements Since 2003, very few physical changes have been made to the building. The Peggy Kelly Media Arts Studios were downsized in 2004, the School of Realism was put on hold in 2009 and now a portion of the studios has been designated for office space for the pottery studio manager and a program assistant. Two private rental studio areas remain on the west side. Major roof repairs were made in 2006, 2007 and 2009. The 20- year -old roof structure over Studio 14 had been holding standing water and leaking in heavy rain or snow melt and was repaired. The other lower -level area received an improved drainage system and a rebuilding of the kiln room roof support. In 2007, the Art Center Board discussed the possibility of adding additional classroom space, but decided to postpone the project due to the economy and the limited growth of the student population. Future needs for capital improvements include a safer parking lot. According to evaluations from students, verbal questions, and registration from forms on direct mailings, the number one means of advertising is still "word of mouth." Internet searches are growing fast, but "driving by and saw the sign" comes in second. The printed session schedules have been reduced from five per year to four per year. In the fall of 2010, the printed schedule size for all schedules except spring /summer was reduced from a 16- to 24 -page publication to a 15 -by -18 -inch, two - sided, folded publication. The new format has been received well. It is too early to tell if this will negatively affect registration revenues, but staff estimates a savings of $6,000 a year in printing and postage. The Art Center spends approximately $7,500 per year on paid print advertising. General ads are placed for the Media Arts Studios and workshops. Advertising is also placed to promote events such as the 32 E D I N A A R T C E N T E R Taste of Creativity, summer camps, gift sale, Tile Conference and art fairs. In addition, the Art Center sends out direct -mail pieces for special events and openings, occasionally sends flyers home with Edina Public Schools students, organizes outreach exhibits at local businesses such as Jerry's Cafe and works with the Communications & Marketing Department to issue several press releases. Most group exhibits are responsible for printing and mailing their own invitations at the group's expense. The Art Center has taken advantage of the City Extra emails and is on Facebook. icing of Services The Art Center continues a gradual increase in pricing for tuition. Year Hourly Non - Member Hourly Member 2009 $7.50 $6.75 2010 $7.75 $7.00 2011 $8.00 $7.20 The Edina Art Center's pricing remains competitive when compared to similar facilities in the metropolitan area, although we are approximately 10 percent higher than our closest competitor: Bloomington. *The Banfille -Locke senior and student rate for membership is $16 and the Minnetonka rate for senior membership is $45. The Edina Art Center charges an additional $16 studio fee for pottery classes. Media Arts Studios classes are $14 for non - members and $12 for members. Edina resident members received a $5 discount on classes. Camp rates for 2011 include a substantial discount for Edina resident members. ($74 non - members, $64 members, $54 Edina resident members). Media Studios The Peggy Kelly Media Arts Studios offers classes and workshops in computer graphics, photography and video editing. Additionally, self- service facilities are offered for transfer of video, slides, photos and home movies to DVD. These offerings continue to be popular and should remain viable in the near 33 ENM ART CITCR _rS.q Hourly Hourly Membership Membership Non - Member Member Individual Family Eden Prairie $4.40 -$7.20 $3.96 -$6.48 $30 $45 Bloomington $7 $6.26 $35 $50 Edina Art Center $8 $7 $30 $45 Banfille -Locke $7.87 $7.25 $21* $29 Minnetonka $8 $7.20 $50* $50 *The Banfille -Locke senior and student rate for membership is $16 and the Minnetonka rate for senior membership is $45. The Edina Art Center charges an additional $16 studio fee for pottery classes. Media Arts Studios classes are $14 for non - members and $12 for members. Edina resident members received a $5 discount on classes. Camp rates for 2011 include a substantial discount for Edina resident members. ($74 non - members, $64 members, $54 Edina resident members). Media Studios The Peggy Kelly Media Arts Studios offers classes and workshops in computer graphics, photography and video editing. Additionally, self- service facilities are offered for transfer of video, slides, photos and home movies to DVD. These offerings continue to be popular and should remain viable in the near 33 ENM ART CITCR _rS.q E D I N A A R T C E N T E R future. Foreign format conversion and audio dubbing business volume is likely to diminish because of low- priced technology available to home users. Other obsolete technologies (i.e., rental of movie projectors and overhead projectors) are still offered, albeit with little volume, because the equipment is fully amortized. The portrait photo studio was closed in 2011 because it was seldom used. That space will continue to be used as a classroom and video editing studio. Significant Changes in Business /Competitive Environment As management predicted, the opening of the multi - million dollar Bloomington Art Center and the Minnetonka Center for the Arts five years ago has had some impact on Art Center registration revenue. Eden Prairie Art Center opened in the spring of 2009 and by May of 2010 they had more than doubled their revenue projections. Revenue for 2009 was $80,000. Of that revenue, class and program revenues were $33,700, $2,000 in memberships, $8,500 from the Eden Prairie Foundation and $36,000 from patrons, including the Sampson Family who donated the facility to the City of Eden Prairie. It is difficult to determine an average hourly price for Eden Prairie classes since the instructors set their own hourly rate. The Peggy Kelly Media Arts Studios has a competitive advantage in pricing because our customers provide the labor and creative direction for their projects. The competition offers over - the - counter package processing and the customer receives a standardized finished product some days later. Our pricing target is to be at least 50 percent below the competition, though when.adding our Membership fee to a small project, we are occasionally comparably priced. We continue to see coupon or special pricing from the larger firms in movie and video transfer. Our use of discount coupons has seen modest success. Customer Analysis In a recent review of geographical locations on our mailing list, we gathered the following information. This list is comprised of students, potential students, members, other art centers, and art enthusiasts. It does not include businesses or schools. We should note that this does not include the thousands of visitors per year or children (who are included with their parents' addresses.) We are currently exploring the logistics of gathering data to determine a more accurate count of visitors. City a Total Members . Non - Members Edina 1,585 654 931 Minneapolis 961 362 599 Eden Prairie 342 134 208 Bloomington 271 101 170 St. Louis Park 199 72 127 St. Paul. 196 77 119 Richfield 103 40 63 Other Suburbs combined 1,026 407 643 Totals 4,683 1,847 2,860 34 E9M N[T Q/tT[R E D I N A A R T C E N T E R Break -Even Scenario During the past 10 years, the Art Center has averaged $130,000 per year in subsidies from the Liquor Fund to cover its deficit. The Art Center's primary source of income is the class tuition. Currently, class revenues total approximately $320,000 per year, so to make up this deficit, the class fees would need to be raised approximately 40 percent. In comparison to other Art Centers, this would make the Edina Art Center quite a bit higher than any other area Art Center. We have gradually raised the class fees approximately 3 percent per year over the past five years. �� Dill ei�s E D I N A A R T C E N T E R FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE EDINA ART CENTER Note: 2010 financial data is preliminary and unaudited a 36 2008 2009 2010 Retail Sales $40,693 $41,883 $41,003 Concessions 651 444 479 Memberships 27,716 25,496 24,998 Class Registration & Other Fees 335,114 339,469 319,364 Media Studio 47,523 60,925 42,255 Total Operating Revenues 451,697 468,217 428,099 Operating Expens: Cost of Goods Sold 22,303 21,094 17,236 Personnel Services 221,416 244,329 219,647 Contractual Services 302,066 293,356 253,025 Commodities 51,670 59,568 54,725 Central Services 36,533 34,847 34,897 Depreciation 30,206 30,124 26,573 Total Operating Expenses 664,194 683,318 606,103 Operating Income /(Loss) (21.2,497) (95,676) (178,004) Non -C ? Revenue /(Expense) Excess tax increments - 100,124 - Donations 26,474 19,302 31,701 Total Non - Operating Expense 26,474 119,426 31,701 Loss Before Transfers ($186,023) ($95,675) (146,303) n. „r r .7 no r,. -h P. r,. -cre- "Its Reconciliaticf- Operating Revenues $451,697 $468,217 $428,099 Operating Expenses (664,194) (683,318) (606,103) Non - operating Revenues (Expenses) and transfers 161,474 264,426 191,701 Depreciation 30,206 30,124 26,573 Capital Expenditures - - (27,255) Other Accruals 10,440 4,876 2,503 Change in Cash (10,377) 84,325 15,518 January 1 Cash 56,162 45,785 130,110 December 31 Cash $45,785 $130,110 $145,628 Note: 2010 financial data is preliminary and unaudited a 36 E D I N A A R T C E N T E R FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE EDINA ART CENTER Historical Analysis of Subsidies Note: Subsidy amount is based on cash position of fund, not annual performance. 2008 2009 2010 Percent of operating expenses covered by operating revenue: 68% 69% 71% 2010 $150,000 Edina Liquor 2010 $10,000 Construction Fund 2009 $145,000 Edina Liquor 2008 $135,000 Edina Liquor 2007 $1,575 Park Developers Fund 2007 $135,000 Edina Liquor 2006 $110,000 Edina Liquor 2006. $37,000 Construction Fund 2005 $100,000 Edina Liquor 2004 $130,000 Edina Liquor 2004 $25,000 Construction Fund 2003 $111,000 Edina Liquor 2003 $8,587 Construction Fund 2002 $114,000 Edina Liquor 2002 $15,010 Construction Fund 2001 $104,000 Edina Liquor 2001 $8,252 Construction Fund 2000 $139,000 Edina Liquor 1999 $155,000 Edina Liquor Note: Subsidy amount is based on cash position of fund, not annual performance. 2008 2009 2010 Percent of operating expenses covered by operating revenue: 68% 69% 71% k A =rl�. BUSINESS PLAN n 2nun 0=201 m v z D D A c D n n m Z m = I t' i't *.JZ � -�,- 4:;;*"- 7 .......... Lim, I mo - M-T rYMIr.R Gn'F9 OVERALL 54TE FLAN - MA5TFW MAN E D I N A A Q U A T I C C E N T E R Edina Aquatic Center Summary The Edina Aquatic Center, formally known as the Edina Municipal Pool, is the oldest pool in the Hennepin County. On Feb. 5, 1957, the voters of the Village approved the issue of $200,000 in bonds for constructing a pool. In addition, the Dayton brothers graciously donated to the Village 15 acres of land and 9.2 acres of Lake Cornelia, with the Village purchasing an additional 10.4 acres of land and 29.2 acres of lake area at a total cost of $50,000. The Edina Municipal Pool officially opened in the summer of 1958 with the pool dedication on July 9, 1958. In 2010, the Edina Aquatic Center recovered 126 percent of its operating expenses with operating revenues — an outstanding result for a municipal swimming pool operation. The Edina Aquatic Center is brought to life each year by roughly 71 part -time seasonal, 135 percent full -time maintenance and 120 percent administrative staff, or "cast," members. 13ij0nPc,5 S#rntprry IlAndite How We Achieve Success Formula: 1. By taking an aggressively friendly approach, one that encompasses smiles, enthusiasm, sincerity, high energy and, above all, concern for the happiness and safety of the guest. 2. Also by treating each and every guest as VIP —very important people, and very individual people, too. 3. Cross training and cross utilizing cast members. Our Service Goal: "Give the people everything you can give them, keep the place as clean as you can, keep it friendly and make it a fun place to be." Elements of Our Service Goal: 1. Safety 2. Courtesy 3. Show 4. Efficiency Capital Improvements Staff is moving foward with the process to advertise and bid the Flowrider. We plan to begin construction this summer and open the amenity in 2012. The FlowRider will not be included in the daily admission or season ticket fee. Early projected revenues for the FlowRider are 4,000 daily wrist bands at a cost of $5 each for a total of $20,000 and 1,200 add -ons to the season ticket at $50 each for an additional $60,000. The expenses for staffing, electricity and chemicals are projected to be $14,000, for a net of $66,000. 38 E D I N A A Q U A T I C C E N T E R Other smaller capital improvement projects are replacing the epoxy floor in the bathhouse and replacing the water softener and possibly one of three pool heaters. We've traditionally paid for the smaller capital improvement projects through our operational budget. Marketing Staff feels that the most important piece is to refresh and renew the facility on an annual basis. Each and every year, thousands of dollars are spent to refresh and renew the facility. It has been our goal to make it look like a brand -new facility for the first guest through the door. In addition, each spring we time sending out our pool brochures to the previous year's season ticket holders in an attempt to get them to hit the doorsteps on one of the first really nice days of spring. Since 2002, guests have also been able to purchase season tickets online at www. EdinaAquaticCenter.com. Incentives are in place for those who purchase their season tickets on or before April 30. Now more than ever, the facility's website is a cornerstone of marketing. The website is meant to show off the amenities and demonstrate the facility's friendliness and cleanliness. We also added a virtual tour of the facility in 2008 similar to the virtual tours on the websites of Braemar Golf Course, Centennial Lakes Park and Edinborough Park. The facility has begun using social media, Facebook in particular. The Edina Aquatic Center does not place paid advertisements. Management has felt that by refreshing the facility each year and continuing to add new amenities, interest will remain strong and through word of mouth will keep the Edina Aquatic Center the facility of choice. Pricing of Service Our pricing strategy recognizes the competitive nature of the aquatic center business as well as the convenience and amenities offered by our facility. Management has always priced daily admission on the high end of the industry in an attempt to steer patrons into purchasing season tickets. In 2009, daily admission ranged from a low for the Richfield Municipal Pool at $8 to the Eagan Cascade Bay at $9 and the Edina Aquatic Center at $10. A4� A higher daily admission rate is also a great way to gain revenue out of the large groups that come to frequent aquatic facilities, but also have a tendency to overtax the facility. Groups frequent the Edina Aquatic Center each day during the work week. Groups need to call in advance to make reservations to ensure admittance and travel from as far as Andover, Big Lake, Burnsville, Dayton, Hudson and Spring Lake Park. In the aquatic industry, facilities have given a slight discount to residents when investing in the facility by purchasing a season ticket, but have never separated "resident" from "non- resident" with daily admission fee. It is staff's recommendation to continue this practice. 1 39 E D I N A A Q U A T I C C E N T E R Sianifir7int C'h;inQpS in Rlrcinacc /rmmnPtltittP Fn,14- -mment The Edina Aquatic Center currently offers a summer season in which we open the first Saturday after the Edina Public Schools' school year ends and closes the fourth Sunday in August. This allows the Edina Aquatic Center time to properly hire and train the 50 to 60 part-time seasonal employees it takes to bring the facility to life each year. High school employees are not available earlier in the season, and high school and college employees are not available later in the season. Aquatic Center users continue to "shop" for the newest and most innovative recreational experience. Neighboring communities have either built new or renovated existing facilities to remain competitive. St. Louis Park continues to provide the stiffest competition with a brand new facility in 1997. Richfield and Bloomington have renovated facilities, but lack the star power of Edina, St. Louis Park, Anoka, Apple Valley or Eagan. Anoka and Eagan have the two nicest aquatic centers, with over $7 million invested in each. In 2010, Anoka added a lazy river, additional waterslides and a concession stand and Eagan worked with Themescapes to build a themed ship of their own with slides and a rope swing for patrons to enjoy. In 2009, Apple Valley added a lazy river and a funnel -style waterslide. Other competition in the last four years is the development of the state's largest Lifetime Fitness center in Chanhassen and the Waterpark of America, an indoor waterpark in Bloomington. The Edina Aquatic Center tries to distinguish itself from other aquatic centers in a number of ways: • Independent 100 percent zero -depth pool with interactive water playground. A particularly attractive design to families with toddlers who are looking to be segregated from the main pool. • Themed platform and zip -line. This is an amenity unique to Edina's facility. • Themed dry playground. The dry play area is clearly superior to other facilities and offers an enhanced play environment. • Waterslide tower off the pool deck with a separate plunge pool. • Step -in -entry into the main pool so that parents can sit on the steps as their children acclimate to the deeper water. • Jeff Ellis and Associates trained and certified lifeguards. Many patrons feel much safer at our facility. 40 E D I N A A Q U A T I C C E N T E R Other competitive issues to be mindful of include: • The City of St. Louis Park is looking to add a significant new amenity, either a separate wading pool with large interactive play structure or a surfing pool. • The City of Bloomington is looking to work with Themescapes to add a themed ship's bow and cable ride like the Edina Aquatic Center's. • The City of Hopkins "Shady Oak Beach" is looking to work with Themescapes to add a similar dry playground to the Edina Aquatic Center's. • The City of St. Paul is currently building a new pool with a theme platform and cable ride. • The Edina Aquatic Center is disadvantaged by its relatively small size (compared with other metro facilities) and the inability to expand in its present location. 'syr_ ,A Learn to Swim History From 1958 through 2002, the Edina Park & Recreation Department ran Learn to Swim lessons at the pool. By the year 2000, with the development of more private indoor climate - controlled Learn to Swim Programs, our numbers began to decline. It also became more and more difficult to find the Water Safety Instructors, so in 2003, the Edina Park & Recreation Department solicited private partnership offers. Our first partnership was a five -year agreement with Foss Swim School. Foss Swim School paid rent to the Edina Aquatic Center to run Learn to Swim lessons in the plunge pool, but also had a developmental swim team called AquaJets utilizing the main pool. At the conclusion of the first five - year agreement, the Edina Park & Recreation Department once again took proposals for a new Learn to Swim contract, but reduced the length to two years to allow greatly flexibility to go a different direction with the facility if needed. At this time, we are entering the second year of our third Learn to Swim contract and second year of a two -year agreement with Martha Burns. Our net for the 2011 summer season will be roughly $29,000. If we decide to eliminate the Learn to Swim program at the Edina Aquatic Center, it will be because we either we can't get the facility refreshed in the overnight hours or we'd like to provide a soft opening for our season ticket holders, thus providing more value. I 41 j J EDIN- A - A- QUATIC CENTER Customer Analysis: 2007 — 2010 2007 2009 — 2010 Types of Season Pass: Resident Individual Resident Family Non - Resident Individual Non - Resident Family Total Passes Total Number of Names Resident Revenue Non - Resident Revenue 438 373 394 1,806 1,623 1,561 192 172 174 903 899 8,40 3,339 3,067 2,969 10,568 9,791 9,269 $334,320 $280,509.30 $242,536.51 (65 %) (60 %) (58 %) $180,350 $189,971.99 $175,004.64 (35 %) (40 %) (42 %) Non - Resident Season Tickets – Top Cities & Number 2010 Minneapolis - 582 Eden Prairie - 116 Richfield - 84 Bloomington - 78 St. Louis Park - 22 Hopkins - 16 Victoria - 11 St. Paul - 9 34 other cities In 2004, the Edina Aquatic Center experienced the coldest and wettest summer on record with 65 days below the average temperature and only one day of 90 degrees or better. In 2005, those that had purchased 2004 season tickets and rarely used them because of the unseasonably cold weather probably thought twice before reinvesting in 2005. That being said, the Edina Aquatic Center saw a high in ticket sales back 1999 with 4,064 tickets and more than 16,000 names on those tickets. In recent years, the Edina Aquatic Center has settled in at roughly 3,000 passes with between 10,000 and 11,000 names on them. However, slipping below 10,000 names in 2008 and 2009 for the first time since 1997 indicates the need to continually find ways to improve the facility. Facilities that are 40 years newer and cost several million dollars to build such as Anoka, Apple Valley and Eagan have all made significant facility improvements in 2009 and 2010. The most significant was Anoka reinvesting just short of $3 million. �P A% 42 2007 2009 Minneapolis – 523 Minneapolis - 630 Eden Prairie –157 Eden Prairie - 139 Bloomington –100 Richfield - 77 Richfield – 85 Bloomington - 71 St. Louis Park – 42 St. Louis Park - 26 Hopkins – 31 Minnetonka - 22 Minnetonka – 24 Hopkins - 19 St. Paul – 22 Golden Valley - 10 Chanhassen –13 Chanhassen - 7 36 other cities 37 other cities 2010 Minneapolis - 582 Eden Prairie - 116 Richfield - 84 Bloomington - 78 St. Louis Park - 22 Hopkins - 16 Victoria - 11 St. Paul - 9 34 other cities In 2004, the Edina Aquatic Center experienced the coldest and wettest summer on record with 65 days below the average temperature and only one day of 90 degrees or better. In 2005, those that had purchased 2004 season tickets and rarely used them because of the unseasonably cold weather probably thought twice before reinvesting in 2005. That being said, the Edina Aquatic Center saw a high in ticket sales back 1999 with 4,064 tickets and more than 16,000 names on those tickets. In recent years, the Edina Aquatic Center has settled in at roughly 3,000 passes with between 10,000 and 11,000 names on them. However, slipping below 10,000 names in 2008 and 2009 for the first time since 1997 indicates the need to continually find ways to improve the facility. Facilities that are 40 years newer and cost several million dollars to build such as Anoka, Apple Valley and Eagan have all made significant facility improvements in 2009 and 2010. The most significant was Anoka reinvesting just short of $3 million. �P A% 42 E D I N A A Q U A T I C C E N T E R 43 r� l E D I N A A Q U A T I C C E N T E R c� E D I N A A Q U A T I C C E N T E R EDINA AQUATIC CENTER V;, - 2008 2009 2010 Retail Sales $4,991 $4,759 $7,442 Concessions 127,087 101,398 123,879 Memberships 450,720 464,570 436,524 Admissions 313,735 261,621 334,851 Building Rental 26,753 27,468 42,245 Other Fee 2,102 - 588 Total Operating Revenues 925,388 859,816 945,529 Cost of Goods Sold 32,754 28,670 35,902 Personnel Services 269,949 261,365 270,884 Contractual Services 131,058 118,074 113,170 Commodities 87,700 142,570 115,070 Central Services 27,482 25,056 22,080 Depreciation 196,575 194,928 194,701 Total Operating Expenses 745,518 770,663 751,767 Operating Income /(Loss) 179,518 89,153 193,762 Non - Operating Revenue, (Expense) and transfer, Bond Interest and Other (42,145) (27,706) (17,841) t-tiang 137,725 61,447 175,921 January 1 Net Assets 2,000,196 2,137,921 2,199,368 December 31 Net Assets 52.137.921 $2,199,368 52.375,289 7 & Investments Reconciliation: Operating Revenues $925,388 $859,816 $945,529 Operating Expenses (745,518) (770,663) (751,767) Non - operating Revenues (Expenses) and transfers (42,145) (27,706) (17,841) Depreciation 196,575 194,928 194,701 Bond Principal (115,000) (110,000) (135,000) Capital Expenditures - (14,915) Other Accruals (455) (2,995) (1,418) Change in Cash 218,845 128,465 234,204 January 1 Cash 960,538 1,179,383 1,307,848 December 31 Cash $1,179,383 $1,307,848 $1,542,052 Note: 2010 financial data is preliminary and unaudited I 45 E D I NA AQUATIC C E N T E R FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE I I—I EDINA AQUATIC CENTER Future Debt Payments Year Principal Interest Total 2011 $125,000 $15,950 $140,950 2012 135,000 13,350 148,350 2013 140,000 10,600 150,600 2014 80,000 8,200 88,200 2015 75,000 6,075 81,075 2016 80,000 3,750 83,750 2017 85,000 1,275 86,275 Final Debt Payment Total $720,000 I $59,200 I $779,200 Represents 2 Bond Issues: Early 1990s to construct original waterslide and zero -depth area - to be retired in 2013. Next issue in 2002 to build plunge pool, cable ride and dry play area to be retired in 2017. Both issues refunded in 2009 with no change in final maturity. 2008 2009 2010 Percent of operating expenses covered by operating revenue: 124% 112% 126% 46 r , u v� �i As E D I N A LIQUOR BUSINESS PLAN n a t P LS 0 � m v z D r A c 0 E D I N A L I Q U O R Edina Liquor Summary The City operates three Edina Liquor stores. The 50th & France store is located at 3943 W. 50th St. The Grandview (Vernon) store is located at 5013 Vernon Ave. The Southdale store is located at 6755 York Ave. All three stores are strategically situated in high traffic areas next to or near a major supermarket. Combined, the three Edina Liquor stores generate nearly $1 million a year in net income for the City. This money is used to subsidize many of the City's public amenities, including Braemar Arena, Braemar Golf Course and the Edina Art Center, and pay for some capital expenditures. Edina Liquor continues to be one of the top - performing municipal operations in Minnesota. Edina Liquor has ranked in the top three Minnesota municipal operations for net profit and gross sales for each of the past 10 years. Edina Liquor has a staff of nine full -time employees and 35 to 45 part time employees, depending on the season. It is overseen by the Liquor Operations Director with each store having a Store Manager. Our Southdale and Grandview locations each have two Assistant Managers and the 50th & France location has one Assistant Manager. Our Southdale location employs up to 20 part-time, Grandview up to 16 part-time and 50th & France up to 9 part-time employees. Our full -time staff averages over 15 years of service with the City of Edina and over 20 years of experience in retail liquor. Our part-time staff averages over two years of service with the City. One of our current part-time employees has worked for Edina Liquor for more than 50 years (full- and part- time). Wine sales continue to be Edina Liquor's highest sales category, representing over 44 percent of total sales. In 2009, the Southdale store was the largest grossing store of a municipal operation in Minnesota. Our Grandview location is the largest grossing store per square foot of any municipal store in the state. income. Our average increase in sales over the past four years is under 5 percent. (The metro average is less than 2 percent per year.) We also feel that by allowing Sunday sales to occur, it will open the door for Wine in Grocery to make a push. While border cities would likely see some increased sales, the vast majority of Minnesota liquor stores, including Edina Liquor, would see a limited increase in sales from being open an extra day. ✓s E D I N A L I '��� � Q U 0 R 47 E D I N A L I Q U O R Business Strategy Update Capital Improvements Staff is looking to redesign the layout of the Southdale store on York Avenue. The store was built in 1996 and has served us well. Overtime, staff has seen a shift in customers' shopping habits and feels the best way to take advantage of these changes is to change the way that the store currently operates. Other improvements in future years consist of replacing entrance and exit doors at the 50th and Southdale locations, replacing beer cooler door lighting with new high- efficiency LED lights at all three stores, replacing rooftop HVAC units at the Southdale location, and replacing outdoor neon signs with new LED -lit signs. While there are.currently no plans.to open a fourth store,.the staff at Edina. Liquor will continue to study the feasibility of this iea. Many factors need to be considered for this to happen with the most important one being location and whether we own or lease a building. We will continue to explore other ways to expand our operation outside of our current stores within the current liquor laws. Marketing In late 2007, the Communications & Marketing Department completed a survey of 265 Edina Liquor customers. Seventy -nine percent of those shoppers live within three miles of their preferred Edina Liquor location. Common comments on the survey were, "proximity," "close to home" and "I drive by on my way to work." According to the survey results, 75 percent of customers shop at Edina Liquor for its convenience or location; 7 percent, friendly staff; 7 percent, coupons; 6 percent, prices; and 5 percent, selection. Like all City departments and facilities, Edina Liquor prides itself in providing exceptional customer service. The survey showed that in the eyes of existing customers, Edina Liquor is doing very well in all areas. Edina Liquor continues to educate the public about its place as a municipal operation and its extensive selection of liquor, beer and wine. Marketing and advertising have been centered on these themes. Wine, liquor and beer tastings are held nearly every weekend and special events with distributors held at various times throughout the year. A bi- monthly newsletter, Edina Liquor Uncorked, has been produced since 2006 and staff is also utilizing Edina's "City Extra," Facebook and Twitter. Edina Liquor is an active member of the Edina Chamber of Commerce and the 50th & France Business & Professional Association. Edina Liquor is a sponsor of the Chamber's annual Emerald Gala and a partner in the Taste of Edina. The Taste of Edina has grown each year and gives Edina Liquor a chance to show the community and customers some of the products that the stores offer. To help build on the Taste of Edina, Edina Liquor held its first spring sale in May of 2010 to coincide with Taste of Edina. Edina Liquor also takes part in the 50th & France Ladies Night Out, held three time a year. In 2010, Edina Liquor participated in the Art Center's first Taste of Creativity. This event was put on by the Art Center and the Fairview Auxiliary. Edina Liquor worked with its vendors to supply wine for sampling. After the event, participants were then able to purchase wine that they tasted at a discounted price for a week. The goal was to add value to those that attended and generate new business for the liquor store. In 2011, Edina Liquor will work with the Edina - Morningside Rotary Club to put on a beer tasting in the Braemar Room at Braemar Golf Course. Our goal is to line up approximately 14 beer vendors ✓s EDINA = :'LIQUOR E D I N A L I Q U O R with each pouring three beers. Again, the value for the participants will be that they can place an order from Edina Liquor at a reduced price just for the attendees. Edina Liquor will continue to look for opportunities to work with other community organizations. Edina Liquor has been active in direct mail advertising for the past four years or so. Our strategy has been to promote more local by zoning where our advertising goes. By using a coupon in our advertising, we are able to track if a campaign is successful. Our goal is to keep our current customers coming back and a coupon gives them a reason to come back among other reasons. We have much greater success in redemption if the coupon is a percentage off the total purchase versus a specific product discount. Currently, more than 500 coupons are redeemed per month from our direct mail advertising. The City first produced Edina Liquor Uncorked in the summer of 2006 as a means to better educate customers and potential customers on Edina Liquor's extensive selection and excellent customer service. Edina Liquor Uncorked is distributed to 370 individuals who have signed up to be on a mailing list. Another 1,500 copies are distributed every two months in all three stores. The newsletter is also available online at www.EdinaLiquor.com. It is in HTML format as opposed to PDF, meaning that all content is found easily on search engines. Edina Liquor has also utilized "City Extra" to keep its customers informed of new products and upcoming events or tastings. Edina Liquor has over 450 subscribers signed up to receive updates. Edina Liquor is also using Facebook and Twitter to get its message out and to keep its customers informed and up to date on new products and tastings that the stores have to offer. These two social media applications have been very effective for us in letting our customers know about new and limited - release craft beers that we receive into our stores. Edina Liquor customers are very computer literate and we are able to use that to our advantage by offering Wine Connect which allows individuals to order liquor, beer or wine online. To be competitive in this market, we need to be able to show our customers Edina Liquor's liquor, beer and wine inventory. Edina Liquor will continue to advertise in a variety of different media. The most successful advertising to date has been a direct mail piece produced by Dollars & Sense. We consistently receive approximately 300 coupons over a three -day period once a month when a 15 percent off wine coupon is published. Our staff is asked quite often by our customers "When is the next coupon coming out ?" Other advertisers we work with include Edina Magazine, City Pages, Edina Community Education, Town Planner, Edina Sun- Current, Dex and Verizon phone directories, and Comcast, including its ✓s E D I N A L I Q U 0 R 49 E D I N A L I Q U O R own commercials for cable television to target our core buying groups using zoned -based advertising instead of mass advertising such as radio or network N. u l t Delivery /Wine Club Currently, Edina Liquor does not deliver any of its products '�� :• to consumers. We feel that the liability is far too great to risk making home deliveries. Also, with the high cost of fuel and an increase in insurance premiums, we would not see a large enough increase to our bottom line to add this service. To our knowledge, there is not one municipal liquor operation in the metro that makes home deliveries. Edina Liquor does not have a wine club. In the past, we found that those asking for a wine club wanted one in order to get a discount while shopping at our stores. We are always looking for ways to work with groups that want to hold special events and feel we can teach and promote the stores in this fashion while also benefiting the community. Edina Liquor will continue to evaluate whether a wine club is in the City's best interest going forward. Online Ordering Edina Liquor currently has an online ordering site within our website, www.EdinaLiquor.com. This site is only to place an order online. The customer has to come to our store to pay for and pick up the product. We do not ship any product from our stores. The reason we do it this way is that it is the only way for us to make a legal sale. We feel it is very important to put a face to the product we are selling, and by selling over the internet we cannot do our job properly. It also could increase liability to the City if an internet transaction were to go bad. Gift Cords Over the past few years, Edina Liquor has promoted its gift cards as a way to purchase liquor, beer or wine without knowing what a person's taste are. We tend to put more emphasis on this during the holiday months as this is the time for more gift giving. Our gift card sales went up 13 percent from 2009 to 2010. Our gift card redemption has also gone up 25 percent from 2009 to 2010. We feel that this area will keep growing as more customers see the benefit to letting the recipient pick out what they like. "Irking of Services Edina Liquor continues to work to be as competitive with our competition as possible, while still working to maintain a healthy gross profit. Management continues to adjust its pricing to fit customers' buying habits and feels that the stores compete well with the surrounding competition. While price is always important, we have found that service, selection and well- maintained stores play a big part in a positive shopping experience and repeat business. One area in which Edina Liquor has been more aggressive is its liquor -, beer- and wine -of- the -month specials. It is no surprise that wine is the leader of this promotion, with average sales of 350 to 400 cases sold each month. Because of this success, Edina Liquor is able to get the best price in the market, giving our customers a great value for their money while still being able to make a profit for the stores. To the best of staff's knowledge, there are only a few other stores in the state that can compete with 50 E D I N A 'LIQU0R E D I N A L I Q U O R Edina Liquor in terms of cases of wine sold from a single winery in a month. We will continue to look for ways to offer customers the best price and best selection of liquor, beer and wine for this highly successful promotion. Another area in which we look to be aggressive in is the Spring Sale. This sales event will be the only one that we mass advertise to our community and surrounding communities. This spring sale allows us to compete with Surdyk's and Haskell's on an annual basis for business. While the other two run their Spring Sales in March and April, Edina Liquor runs its sale to coincide with Taste of Edina in May. This allows Edina Liquor to capture business before a major holiday and also after the other sales have ended. While sales at Edina Liquor increased 1.7 percent in 2010, our customer count was flat with an increase of only 210 customers. While we are not pleased that our customer count did not increase, we were very pleased that sales increased 1.7 percent in this economy. The average transaction increase per customer in 2010 was 42 cents. While this is not a large increase per transaction, it looks much better when you know that there were 506,410 customers who came through our doors in 2010. Significant Changes in Business /Competitive Environment Edina Liquor continues to be one of the most profitable municipal liquor operations in the state. Even though Edina Liquor has no geographical competition within the City limits, we are constantly in competition with stores that border our community. Competitors include Richfield Liquor, Eden Prairie Liquor, Trader Joe's, France & 44 Liquor, South Lyndale Liquor, Sam's Club and Costco. We also have competition from the internet, which can affect all stores. Many of these stores will price advertise at some point during the year. Consumers are able to shop and compare at home instead of going to the stores to check out what they want or need. Edina Liquor's goal is to be as competitive as possible while still working within our pricing framework. Customers have become more educated about wine, liquor and beer due to traveling and access to information on the internet. Up until the last few years, our customers tended to purchase more high -end products which they considered to be better. With the turn in the economy, we have seen a change in their buying habits. While they still like high -end products, they are buying them less frequently. Younger consumers are attracted to name brand products and price does not seem to be as much of a factor in their buying decisions. Legislation was passed in 2006 allowing liquor stores in Hennepin County to stay open until 10 p.m. Monday through Saturday. Currently, Minneapolis, Hopkins and Bloomington are the only bordering cities to change to 10 p.m. Edina has the local option to change to the later closing ✓s EDINAVN ?LIQUOR 51 E D I N A L I Q U O R time if it chooses. Whether Sunday sales go through or not, management will look at our hours of operation, especially at our Grandview and 50th & France locations. We'll be looking at our hours between 8 and 10 p.m. on Friday and Saturday. It maybe in our best interest to modify the hours at these two stores given that many of the businesses near them close by 8 p.m. at the latest on these two nights. 50th averages 55 customers per hour from 8 to 10 p.m. on both Friday and Saturday and $1,100 in sales per hour both nights also. Grandview averages 86 customers per hour from 8 to 10 p.m. and $1925 per hour both nights compared to Southdale at 177 customers per hour from 8 to 10 p.m. and $3687 in sales per hour both nights. Over the past few years, we again are seeing big changes in our industry. While the economy has had a negative effect on many businesses, the liquor business continues to hold its own. Our customers are not buying as much high -end wine, choosing to spend their same money on two bottles instead of the one that they might normally buy. Consumers are willing to spend more for liquor right now than wine as liquor will last longer. Vodka continues to lead the liquor category with Irish Whiskey and Tequila showing strong gains. Scotch continues to be our second highest liquor sales item with Single Malts still growing. We continue to expand this segment and have become a destination store for scotch. The craft beer category is off the charts compared to other beer categories. While domestic beer is down, the craft segment is showing big gains with no slowdown in sight. Whether it is $20 for a four -pack or $5 for a single bottle, these products are in demand and customers are shopping around to see who has what. As far as wine goes, the big growth area is in the $8 to $15 range. California Chard and Cabernet are our most consistent sellers with wines from Italy, Spain, Argentina and South Africa and New Zealand showing strong growth. As in years past, the City's biggest competitive threat to Edina Liquor continues to be the proposed "Wine in Grocery" or "Wine with Dinner" legislation to allow wine sales in grocery stores. This legislation has been defeated the last nine years and staff will continue to work hard to fight this change. In the years to come, we'll see more movement with legislation to allow Sunday sales. The City will continue to actively work with the Minnesota Municipal Beverage Association and the Minnesota Licensed Beverage Association to defeat liquor legislation that could negatively impact the municipal liquor operation. ✓_ 52 ED IN A L I Q U O R R E D I N A L I Q U O R EDINA LIQUOR Liquor Wine Beer Miscellaneous Total Sales Operating Expenses: Cost of Goods Sold Salaries Contractual Services Commodities Depreciation Central Services Total Operating Expenses Operating Income Non - operating Revenue (Expense) Income Before Transfers FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE 2008 2009 $3,379,613 $3,472,354 5,326,949 5,581,778 3,148,372 3,316,016 266,857 272,482 12,121,791 12,642, 630 8,940,015 1,329,629 437,691 76,209 193,091 69,874 11, 046, 509 1,075,282 (1,906) $1,073,376 I I - . r " ^' Cash & Investments Reconciliatie-: Operating Revenues $12,121,791 Operating Expenses (11,046,509) Non - operating Revenues (Expenses) and transfers (1,279,706) Depreciation 69,874 Capital Expenditures - Other Accruals 131,841 Change in Cash (2,709) January 1 Cash 1,125,589 December 31 Cash $1,122,880 Note: 2010 financial data is preliminary and unaudited 9,300,699 1,361,602 472,412 62,538 186,144 65,799 11,449,194 1,193,436 13,147 1,206,583 $12,642,630 (11,449,194) (1,296,953) 65,799 (157,853) 73,262 (122,309) 1,122,880 $1,000,571 A. EDINAV'� LIQUOR 2010 $3,529,415 3,665,986 3,383,851 275,441 12,854,693 9,467,169 1,343,408 449,087 75,228 191,168 68,583 11,594,643 1,260,050 2,371 1,262,421 $12,854,693 (11,594,643) (1,242,729) 68,583 (2,165) (189,962) (106,223) 1,000,571 $894,348 53 E D I N A L I Q U O R EDINA LIQUOR eINA'JC:IAL PERFURFAAWCE flnnrn+;,mcY Rw Ctrnrch- Ynnq_7niit 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 Percent of operating expenses covered by operating revenue: 110% 110% 111% 1�b 54 ED I N A L I Q U 0 R Operating Revenues $2,203,910 $2,212,434 $2,240,912 Operating Expenses (2,152,940) (2,130,314) (2,146,453) Operating Income $50,970 $82,120 $94,459 .. ~ ` •Ie Store (No. 2) Operating Revenues $5,400,896 $5,672,296 $5,798,260 Operating Expenses (4,801,331) (5,024,611) (5,114,484) Operating Income $599,565 $647,685 $683,776 r -view Store (No. 3) Operating Revenues $4,516,985 $4,757,900 $4,815,521 Operating Expenses (4,092,238) (4,294,269) (4,333,706) Operating Income $424,747 $463,631 $481,815 2008 2009 2010 Percent of operating expenses covered by operating revenue: 110% 110% 111% 1�b 54 ED I N A L I Q U 0 R E D I N A L I Q U O R FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE EDINA LIQUOR Historical Analysis of Liquor Transfers MY, ear Amount Recipient 2010 $765,100 General Fund 2010 150,000 Construction 2010 150,000 Edina Art Center 2010 80,000 Braemar Arena 2010 100,000 Braemar Golf Course Total $1,245,100 2009 $765,100 General Fund 2009 150,000 Construction 2009 145,000 Edina Art Center 2009 80,000 Braemar Arena 2009 170,000 Braemar Golf Course Total $1,310,100 2008 $742,800 General Fund 2008 150,000 Construction Fund 2008 135,000 Edina Art Center 2008 80,000 Braemar Arena 2008 170,000 Braemar Golf Course Total $1,277,800 2007 $721,200 General Fund 2007 125,000 Construction Fund 2007 135,000 Edina Art Center 2007 80,000 Braemar Arena Total $1,061,200 2006 $700,230 General Fund 2006 100,000 Construction Fund 2006 110,000 Edina Art Center 2006 85,000 Braemar Arena Total $995,230 As E D I N A s:•'LIQU0R E D I N A L I Q U O R FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE EDINA LIQUOR Historical Analysis of Liquor Transfers Continued 2005 2005 2005 Total 2004 2004 2004 Total 2003 2003 Total 2002 2002 Total $786,500 100,000 41,000 $927,500 $766,500 130,000 103,000 $999,500 $784,000 111,000 $895,000 $625,000 114,000 $739,000 Construction Fund Edina -Art Center Braemar Arena Construction Fund Edina Art Center Braemar Arena Construction Fund Edina Art Center Construction Fund Edina Art Center ✓S EDINA LIQUOR q of F°'A A . n4o Lrg C ebm nM curve CENTENNIAL G LAKES PARK BRAEMAR T ARENA EDINAl%LIQUOR C ' C 1 E G { V ow e.. RPOPl'��O IBBB www.CityofEdina.com Finance Department 952- 826 -0366 Communications & Marketing Department 952 - 826 -0359 AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL APRILS, 2011 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *.) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner or Council Member so requests it. In such cases the item will be. removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of March 15, 2010 II. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL PROCLAMATION —ARBOR DAY 2011 PROCLAMATION — DAYS OF REMEMBRANCE — Sunday May 1, 2011 PROCLAMATION —EARTH DAY, APRIL 22, 2011 * I. APPROVAL OF. MINUTES - Regular Meeting of March 15; 2010 and Work Session of March 15, 2010 II. AWARD OF-BID/CHANGE ORDERS A. Edina Fire Department — Training Center 6th Floor Burner * B. Edina Fire Department — Repair of Fire Department Pumper E -81 * C. 2.011 Commodities Purchase - Sand, Rock, Bituminous Materials, Concrete, and Water Treatment Chemicals — Continue to April 19, 2011 * D. Contract ENG 11 -5, Imp Nos. BA -334, SS -460, STS -375 WM -511 & BR -7; Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements & West 56th Street Bridge E. Contract ENG/10 -13, Imp. No. WM -509 Gleason Road Water Tower Cleaning, Repairing and Painting * F. Contract 11 -01PK Chowen Park Playground Improvements * G. 2011 EVAPCO Evaporator — Condenser — Braemar Arena Agenda/Edina City Council April 5, 2011 Page 2 III. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Gypsy Moth Presentation, Lucia Hunt, Minnesota Department of Agriculture B. Proposed Modification of the City Council Meeting Agenda C. Proposed Business Subsidy Policy D. Proposed Tax Increment Financing Policy E. Proposed Sports Dome F. Ord. No. 2011 -03 Amending Section 100.11 Regarding Background Checks (First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass.) G. Park Board Subcommittees H. Appointments to Art Center Board and Heritage Preservation Board I. Resolution No. 2011 -41 Accepting Various Donations * J. Amendment To Agreement Between The Cities of Bloomington & Edina For Public Health Emergency Responses (PHER I, II, III) * K. Resolution No. 2011 -40 Findings of Fad — Denial of Request To Keep More Than Three Animals * L. Set Public Hearing Date (5/3/2011) Delinquent Utilities * M. Water Shutoff Authorization * N. Resolution No. 2011 -42 Approving Cooperative Agreement Between the City of Minneapolis and the City of Edina Regarding Bicycle Parking Project. * O. Resolution No. 2011 -45 Approving Utility Easement along Olinger Boulevard * P. Construction Engineering Services for Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Project * Q. Resolution No. 2011 -43 Approving Construction Grant Agreement Between Metropolitan Council and the City of Edina for Inflow and Infiltration Abatement Projects IV. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speakers on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or or Agenda/Edina City Council April 5, 2011 Page 3 Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. V. FINANCE * A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per, Pre -List dated March 17 2011, TOTAL $1,064,282.71; and per Pre -List dated March 24, 2011, TOTAL $886,490.03; and per Pre -List dated March 31, 2011, TOTAL $573,226.18 and Credit Card Charges: 1/26/2011 to 2/25/2011, TOTAL $8,469.47 VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Correspondence B. Letter Neighbors In The Golf Terrace /Lake Harvey Neighborhood Association VII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS VIII. MANAGER'S COMMENTS' { IX. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952 - 927 - 886172 hours in advance of the meeting. Tues Apr 5 Tues Apr 5 Tues Apr 19 Tues Apr 19 Wed Apr 27 Thur Apr 28 Tues May 3 Tues May 3 Tues May 17 Tues May 17 Wed May 18 Mon May 30 Tues Jun 7 Tues Jun 7 Wed Jun 8 Tues Jun 21 Tues Jun 21 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Work Session — Review of City Enterprise Business Plans 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Work Session — Economic Development 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY- ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS State of The Community 11:30 A.M. INTERLACHEN COUNTRY CLUB Volunteer Recognition Reception 5:00 P.M. EDINBOROUGH PARK GREAT HALL Work Session —Joint Meeting With B & C Chairs 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Work Session —Joint Meeting With Heritage Preservation Brd 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Public Works Open House 3:30 -7:00 P.M. PUBLIC WORKS MEMORIAL DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Work Session — Budget Planning 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Employee Recognition 11:00 A.M. & 12:30 P.M. BRAEMAR CLUBHOUSE Work Session — Neighborhood Associations 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL MARCH 15, 2011 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Chair Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner BeRnett Brindle and seconded by Commissioner Swenson for approval of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 1, 2011, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Berme # Brindle and seconded by Commissioner Swenson approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for March 1, 2011. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 7:02 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Scott Neal, Executive Director ^jam VIX0 o PROCLAMATION ARBOR DAY APRIL 29, 2011 WHEREAS, in 1872, J. Sterling Morton proposed to the Nebraska Board of Agriculture that a special day be set aside for the planting of trees, and WHEREAS, this holiday, called Arbor Day, was first observed with the planting of more than a million trees in Nebraska, and . WHEREAS, 2011 is the 139th anniversary of the holiday and Arbor day is now observed throughout the nation and the world, and WHEREAS, trees are a most valuable resource, purifying our air, helping conserve our soil and energy, serving as a recreational setting, providing a habitat for wildlife of all kinds, and enriching our lives in other important ways; and WHEREAS, trees can reduce the erosion of our precious topsoil by wind and water, cut heating and cooling costs, moderate the temperature, clean the air, produce life- giving oxygen, and provide habitat for wildlife, and WHEREAS, disease, insects and pollution have damaged and continue to threaten our trees, creating the need for tree care and tree planting programs and fostering greater public concern for the future of our urban forest; and r WHEREAS, Edina is proud of the beautiful shade trees which grace our homes and public places; and NOW, THEREFORE, I, James B. Hovland, Mayor of Edina, do hereby proclaim April 29; 2011, to. be Arbor'Day and call upon the spirited and foresighted citizens of Edina to plant trees now for our pleasure and that of future generations. Dated this 5th day of April 2011. James B. Hovland Mayor 9 REPORT/RECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Susan Howl ® Action HRRC Staff Liaison Discussion Information Date: April 5, 2011 Subject: DAYS OF REMEMBRANCE ACTION REQUESTED That the City Council approve the recommendations of the Human Rights & Relations Commission: • To observe the week from Sunday, May 1St through Sunday, May 81h, 2011, as Holocaust Days of Remembrance in the City of Edina; and • To set aside Sunday, May 1St, as the Day of Remembrance in order to remember the victims of the Holocaust at an Open House in City Hall INFORMATION /BACKGROUND • . The foyer of Edina City Hall will be set up with displays and refreshments from 2:00 to 4:00 PM on Sunday, May 1St • HRRC will promote the event throughout the community and connect with congregations of the local synagogues. • There will be a short program at 3:00 PM in the Council Chambers. HRRC Chair, Jessi Kingston, and John Cashmore, HRRC Member, will introduce Mayor Hovland who will present a proclamation to be sent to Washington. A Holocaust survivor will be introduced and will share the importance and the meaning behind this remembrance. It is hoped that a Rabbi will be able to share a few words. • At the conclusion of the program, visitors will be encouraged to speak. • A guest book will be available for all to sign. ATTACHMENT • Proclamation �9 wti O ' v' /�88a to PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, the Holocaust was the state - sponsored systematic persecution and annihilation of European Jewry.by Nazi Germany and its collaborators between 1933 and 1945, with six million murdered; and WHEREAS,, the history of the Holocaust offers an opportunity to reflect on the moral responsibilities of individuals, societies and governments; and WHEREAS, we the people of the City of Edina should always remember the terrible events of the'Holocaust and remain vigilant against hatred, persecution and tyranny; and WHEREAS, we the people of the City of Edina should actively rededicate ourselves to the principles of individual freedom in a just society; and - WHEREAS, the Days of Remembrance have been set aside for the people of the City of Edina to remember the victims of the Holocaust as well as to reflect on the need for respect of all peoples; and' WHEREAS, pursuant to an Act of .Congress, the United States Holocaust Memorial Council designates the Days of Remembrance of the Victims of the Holocaust to be Sunday, May 1 through Sunday;. May 8, 2011, including the Day of Remembrance known as Yom Hashoah, May 1 2011. . NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Edina does hereby proclaim the week of Sunday, May 1 through Sunday, May 8, 2011, as DAYS OF REMEMBRANCE in memory of the victims of the Holocaust and in honor of the survivors as well as the rescuers and liberators, and further proclaim that we, as citizens of the City of Edina should work to promote human dignity and confront hate whenever and wherever it occurs. Dated this 5th day of April, 2011. James B. Hovland, Mayor PROCLAMATION Earth Day Proclamation Earth Day 2011 WHEREAS the global community now faces extraordinary challenges, such as global health issues, food and water shortages, and economic struggles; and WHEREAS all people, regardless of race, gender, income, or geography, have a moral right to a healthy, sustainable environment with economic growth; and WHEREAS it is understood that the citizens of the global community must step forward and take action to create a green economy to combat the aforementioned global challenges; and WHEREAS a green economy can be achieved on the individual level through educational efforts, public policy, and consumer activism campaigns; and WHEREAS it is necessary to broaden and diversify this global movement to achieve maximum success; and FURTHERMORE, let it be known that the City of Edina, Minnesota hereby encourages its residents, businesses and institutions to use EARTH DAY to celebrate the Earth and commit to building a sustainable and green economy; NOW THEREFORE IT BE RESOLVED, the City of Edina, hereby proclaims this Earth Day, April 22, 2011, to support green economy initiatives in City of Edina, and to encourage others to undertake similar actions. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, James B. Hovland, Mayor, City of Edina, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the city of to be affixed this fifth day of April, 2011. James B. Hovland, Mayor OF, MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MARCH 15, 2011 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson approving the Council consent agenda with the exceptions of Items IV.E., Traffic Safety Committee Report of March 2, 2011, and IV.F., Approval of Contract for 2010 -2012, IAFF 1275 (Fire Fighters). Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES APPROVED — REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH S. 2011, AND WORK SESSION OF MARCH 1, 2011 Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson approving the minutes of the regular meeting of March 5, 2011, and work session of March 1, 2011. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING HELD AND ORDINANCE NO. 2011 -3 ADOPTED — AMENDING SECTION 850.04 REGARDING NOTICE OF HEARING FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Planning Director Teague presented the amendment to reduce the notification distance requirement for Conditional Use Permits requested for additions to existing homes or new homes in which the new first floor elevation exceeded the first floor elevation of the existing structure by more than one foot in the R -1 and R -2 Zoning Districts. Under such an application the notification distance would be reduced from 1,000 feet to 350 feet since it was similar to a variance review. The Planning Commission recommended approval at its regular meeting in February. Mr. Teague advised staff recommended the Council waive second reading. Upon questions of the Council, Mr. Teague described the type of applications under which this notification would be used. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:04 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to grant First Reading and waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2011 -03, amending the zoning ordinance concerning notification requirements for Conditional Use Permits. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 1 IN Minutes /Edina City Council /March 15, 2011 N PUBLIC HEARING HELD — FINDINGS ORDERED DENYING REQUEST TO KEEP MORE THAN THREE (3) CATS AND DOGS IN AGGREGATE PER CITY CODE SECTION 300.15 Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Police Chief Lone Presentation Police Chief Long reviewed that on January 6, 2009, the Council had denied a similar variance request at this property based on a number of reasons including strong opposition by neighboring residents. Animal Control Officer Presentation Animal Control Officer Hunter presented the basis for his recommendation to deny the requested pet application for five dogs at 523 Coventry Lane, centered on health and public safety concerns, potential for disease, and thirteen resident responses, all in opposition. He noted the applicant's property would not afford enough room to develop an on -site facility for agility training. Mr. Hunter advised that since 2009, staff had received a call for service indicating cats were at the residence. In 2009, the applicant indicated he had turned ownership of the cats to a friend. Mr. Hunter stated when called, the applicant indicated the cats were only at the premises for a visit. The Council requested copies of resident comments regarding this variance request. Proponent Presentation Wayne Carlson, 523 Coventry Lane, proponent, presented his rationale for requesting a variance based on improvement to his mental and physical health and the prestige that championship dogs bring to Edina. He advised that two of his dogs were of a retirement age. Since it takes three to four years to complete training, he requested the variance to start training two new dogs so they were ready for competition when the other two retire. He stated he believed the small amount of feces was not a consideration and he had trained the dogs to stop barking on command. Mr. Carlson stated he had a support petition signed by 22 of 29 closest neighbors; however, one close neighbor was afraid of dogs and reported him for having vicious dogs. Mr. Carlson indicated that following that complaint, the townhouse association president had expressed a realization that his dogs were well trained and not a danger. Mr. Carlson requested the Council's favorable consideration, noting he had provided a copy of his Veteran's Administration Asseeiaie prescription, names of residents in support, and positive resolution as an alternative to staff's recommendation for denial. Mr. Carlson advised of the training centers he used rather than the shared garage space. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:19 p.m. Public Testimony Tammy Newstrom, 1025 Central Avenue, St. Paul, addressed the Council and read a letter of support from fellow animal trainer Nancy Haley. Vicki Handler, 500 Indian Hill Road, Chanhassen, addressed the Council on behalf of her parents, Seymour and Patricia Handler. Scott Edstrom, 305 Coventry Place, addressed the Council. Janet Bohan, 800 Coventry Place, addressed the Council. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /March 15, 2011 Member Sprague introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -40 denying permit for more than three cats or dogs in a home. Member Brindle seconded the motion. The Council discussed that ownership of three dogs would provide opportunity to maintain an active lifestyle and ordinance provision existed for commercial kennels in the case of champion breeding. It was noted that allowing five animals in a multi- housing neighborhood raised concern with adequate green space and impact to neighbors. The Council acknowledged the applicant's love of animals and Council's responsibility to assure balance of rights for all residents, which was accomplished by allowing up to three animals. Member Sprague made a motion to amend, seconded by Member Swenson, directing the City Attorney to prepare findings consistent with denial. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion to amend carried. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Main carried as amended. *AWARD OF BID — CONTRACT NO. ENG 11 -2. IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -384, SS -461, STS -374: WM -510 RIDGE ROAD STREET AND UTILITY RECONSTRUCTION Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson awarding the bid for Contract No. ENG 11 -2, Imp. No. BA -384, SS -461, STS -374, and WM -510; Ridge Road Street and Utility Reconstruction to the recommended low bidder, Midwest Asphalt Corporation at $509,688.75. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -13 ADOPTED — GOLF TERRACE STREET RECONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -355 Assistant City Engineer Sullivan presented the revised feasibility study that reflected information gathered since the January 18,- 2011, public hearing and six options within the public rights -of -way to improve the water quality of Lake Harvey. Staff met with residents to propose the two viable options: 1) installation of curb and gutter; and, 2) narrowing Lakeview Drive to 18 feet, revise the intersections to deter vehicles and increase pedestrian safety. Residents would also be encouraged to undertake shoreline restoration and installation of a buffer strip, with a recommended width of 20 feet, along the shoreline. The work would be private, funded by homeowners, who could be assisted by 50% cost -share grants from the Watershed District. Mr. Sullivan stated the preliminary project cost was estimated at $2,828,000 with $290,000 for sanitary sewer, $900,000 for water main, $508,000 for storm sewer, and $1,130,000 for street improvements. While some of the project costs had changed, the proposed estimated assessments to benefitting properties of $12,500 per Residential Equivalent Unit had not changed since the January 18, 2011, public hearing. Mr. Sullivan stated staff believed either the January 18, 2011, recommendation or the March 15, 2011, recommendation with inclusion of filtration swales and narrowing of Lakeview Drive were necessary, cost effective, and feasible to improve the public infrastructure of the Golf Terrace neighborhood. Mr. Sullivan answered questions of the Council and advised staff recommended no parking on the lake side of Golf Terrace. Staff believed the bid environment remained favorable for this project. The Council discussed the road width needed to accommodate a parking lane on Municipal State Aid routes, noting this was a not an area of high parking need. Mr. Sullivan advised it was anticipated that 300 cars per day use this section of Lakeview Drive and about one -half would divert to Golf Terrace to the north. He expounded on the limited opportunities to improve water quality of Lake Harvey within the City's small rights -of -way. The Council acknowledged the opportunities for residents, who border two - thirds of Harvey Lake shoreline, to improve the water quality through best management practices. Mr. Sullivan advised of the most effective methods to reduce phosphorus loading and treat storm drainage prior to discharge to Lake Harvey. Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /March 15, 2011 The Council discussed aspects of the project including durability of surmountable versus bulkhead curbing and inclusion of resident requested landscaped islands to create traffic calming. It was noted these landscaped islands would have a lesser impact on traffic speeds since it was a one -block area. The installation cost for the islands would be shared by the City and residents, and increase maintenance costs. Mr. Sullivan advised that the intersection could be tightened and the road width narrowed without inclusion of the landscaped islands. The Council acknowledged the neighborhood's interest in this project and its support of surmountable curbs. Mr. Sullivan stated from an environmental standpoint, surmountable curb experienced degradation over time and since 2005 staff and the Council had supported bulkhead style curb. Pedestrian safety was addressed and it was noted that traffic would slow and be lower in volume on a narrowed street. Mr. Sullivan stated staff preferred the January 18, 2011, proposal based on the low benefit realized and increased maintenance of infiltration swales. The Council noted that two properties would not be assessed due to improper public hearing notification. Mr. Sullivan stated that was an oversight on staffs part. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -13 ordering improvement for Golf Terrace Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Improvement No. BA -355 based on March 15, 2011, design parameters. Mayor Hovland seconded the motion. The Council discussed project features including the effectiveness of entry landscaped islands to slow the speed of traffic and level of resident support, parking need on Lakeview Drive, impact of diverted traffic, and cost benefit of swales compared to property owner initiatives. The Council acknowledged its charge was to seek cost effective, efficient, and long- lasting infrastructure; however as a safety measure, the Lakeview Drive landscaped island would remind drivers they were entering a neighborhood. It was noted that narrowing road width at the Lakeview Drive entrance would reduce pavement /costs, lower speeds, and create a narrower pedestrian and bicycle crossing. The Council supported the inclusion of sidewalks. Public Works Director /City Engineer Houle reviewed road widths required to safely accommodate vehicular traffic, sidewalks, and bike paths. Member Swenson and Mayor Hovland withdrew the motion on the floor. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -13 ordering improvement for Golf Terrace Neighborhood Street Reconstruction Improvement No. BA -355 based on March 15, 2011, design parameters including: no entrance landscaped islands at Wind Road and western part of Lakeview Drive, creating a pinch down at Wind Road and western part of Lakeview Drive route to slow turning -in movement, maintaining sidewalk stubs along western part of lakeweed Lakeview Drive and Wind Road to Sherwood, streets as designed with bulkhead curbs, inclusion of swales, and 18 -foot wide road with no parking on Lakeview Drive north of Lake Harvey. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. NICE RIDE MINNESOTA Mr. Houle explained the bicycle rental program offered by Nice Ride Minnesota and recommendation of the Bike Edina Task Force to support the locations of 44th and France Avenue and 50th and France Avenue. The City Council noted this program had been a success in Minneapolis and may partially address parking at 50th and France Avenue. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, supporting an expansion of Nice Ride Minnesota into Edina. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. DECISION RESOURCES PROPOSAL Manager Neal described the survey work of Decision Resources and recommended the Council set a "not to exceed" cost of $24,000 to conduct a citizen satisfaction survey. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, approving a "not to exceed" cost of Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /March 15, 2011 $24,000 for Decision Resources to conduct a citizen satisfaction survey to be funded from the Community Fund. Manager Neal answered the Council's questions and advised that Decision Resources would provide comparability with peer cities. The Council discussed how to customize the survey questions to Edina. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -38 ADOPTED — ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -38 accepting various donations. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT OF MARCH 2. 2011 APPROVED The Council asked staff to restore Section D in future traffic safety reports to inform of the location of traffic concerns. Mr. Houle explained that Section D provided a summary of activity would be included in future reports, and staff would provide a map identifying location of traffic safety calls. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving Traffic Safety Staff Review of March 2, 2011. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. CONTRACT FOR 2010 -2012, IAFF 1275 (FIRE FIGHTERS) APPROVED Manager Neal presented Fire Department data relating to call ratio, revenues, and contract terms. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving IAFF 1275 (Fire Fighters) contracts for 2010, 2011 and 2012. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *ON -SALE AND SUNDAY SALE LIQUOR LICENSES RENEWED Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson approving Club On -Sale and Sunday Liquor License renewals for: Cocina del Barrio, Tavern on France, and McCormick & Schmick's Seafood Restaurant. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. EDINA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION APPOINTMENT MADE Mayor Hovland nominated Robert McKlveen to the Edina Transportation Commission. The Council acknowledged the long- standing service of retiring commissioner Jean White. Mayor Hovland made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, confirming the appointment of Robert McKlveen to the Edina Transportation Commission with a term ending February 1, 2012. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ART CENTER BOARD AND HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD VACANCIES DISCUSSED The Council confirmed its desire to follow an equitable process to fill board vacancies with applicants who had been interviewed. The Council directed the City Clerk to contact eligible applicants to assure they remained interested and schedule appointment for the April 5, 2011, meeting. *RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -39 ADOPTED — ACCEPTING GRANT FOR INSTALLATION OF SOLAR PANELS ON CITY HALL Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson to adopt Resolution No. 2011 -39, authorizing execution Renewable Energy Grant Agreement No. B53982. Motion carried on rollcall vote —five ayes. Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /March 15, 2011 *ENGINEERING PROPOSAL APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES FOR RIDGE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson authorizing City Manager to execute the engineering proposal for construction phase services for Ridge Road reconstruction project. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. SPRING FLOODING UPDATE PROVIDED Mr. Neal commented on the importance of the City's involvement with protecting private property. Mr. Houle updated the Council regarding the potential for spring flooding, Public Works Department's action plan, sandbag procedures, and contact information. Utility Engineer Struve asked the Council to direct resident calls to him for prompt response. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared to comment. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated March 3, 2011, and consisting of 28 pages: General Fund $82,046.57; Communications Fund $9,369.00; Working Capital Fund $387,203.67; Equipment Replacement Fund $102,935.25; Art Center Fund $18,439.36; Aquatic Center Fund $1,943.17; Golf Course Fund $7,538.73; Ice Arena Fund $13,217.61; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $20,455.86; Liquor Fund $156,699.52; Utility Fund $83,616.10; Storm Sewer Fund $916.00; Recycling Fund $32.73; PSTF Agency Fund $5,116.34; TOTAL $889,529.91 and for approval of payment of claims dated March 10, 2011, and consisting of 28 pages: General Fund $397,387.58; Communications Fund $29.66; Police Special Revenue $78.00; Working Capital Fund $61,585.62; Art Center Fund $2,610.43; Golf Dome Fund $2,825.01; Aquatic Center Fund $551.03; Golf Course Fund $13,813.44; Ice Arena Fund $35,579.38; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $3,940.34; Liquor Fund $217,804.28; Utility Fund $37,486.88; Storm Sewer Fund $10,500.00; Recycling Fund $24.48; PSTF Agency Fund $4,434.54; TOTAL $788.650.67. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. "PILOT WITHIN A PILOT" POSTPONED AND REFERRED TO ENVIRONMENT AND ENERGY COMMISSION Mayor Hovland presented and requested the Council's consideration of the Green Steps Cities Program "Pilot within a Pilot" at a cost of was $5,000 to measure the City's carbon footprint. The Council indicated its preference to receive a timely recommendation from the Environment and Energy Commission prior to consideration. Manager Neal advised staff had recently completed a fair amount of this information. Council consensus was reached to postpone consideration to the April 5, 2011, meeting to receive staffs report and allow time for EEC review and recommendation on this program. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 10:25 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, April 5, 2011. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the March 15, 2011, meeting available. Page 6 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MARCH 15, 2011 5:04 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:04 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Planning Commission Members attending the meeting were Jeffrey Carpenter, Michael Fischer, Arlene Forrest, Floyd Grabiel, Michael Platteter, Ken Potts, Matt Rock, Nancy Scherer, Kevin Staunton and Melissa Stefanik. Staff attending the meeting included: Kris -Aaker, Assistant Planning Director; Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications & Marketing Director; Roger Knutson, City Attorney; Scott Neal, City Manager; Ceil Smith, Assistant to the City Manager; and Cary Teague, Planning Director. Mayor Hovland said the purpose of the meeting was to meet with the Planning Commission about its proposed changes to the variance review process, traffic review, public hearings and required Commission attendance. In order to streamline the review process, the Planning Commission recommended dissolving the City's current Zoning Board of Appeals. Commissioners Michael Fischer and Kevin Staunton explained that the Planning Commission would take over the responsibilities of the Zoning Board of Appeals. The Planning Commission would likely have to meet twice a month to process all requests and applications in a timely fashion. Council members indicated their general support for such a move, directing Director Teague to draft an ordinance to effect that change. Director Teague reported that residents have expressed concerns about the confusion caused by multiple public hearings during the development review process. After a discussion, it was agreed that hearings would continue to be held by both the Planning Commission and City Council, but that one notice listing both meeting dates and times would be mailed instead of two and one legal notice listing both meeting dates and times would be published. Director Teague reported that concern was raised by members of the Transportation Commission about the need for their review of traffic studies for individual development projects. The Planning Commission area recommended that the Transportation Commission could focus its efforts on larger transportation issues and studies, rather than review individual projects, which could be done by the Planning Commission. Council members indicated their support for such a change. Commissioner Fischer suggested the Planning and Transportation Commissions meet jointly to transition the work. Commissioner Fischer suggested that joint meetings of the City Council and its advisory boards and commissions be exempt from the City's attendance policy. Council members stressed the importance of the joint meetings and did not show support for such an exemption. Mayor Hovland announced the status of some bills in the Legislature at the time of the meeting. Commissioner Staunton announced the April 14 kick -off of the Grandview Small Area Plan. Director Teague provided a brief update on the proposed Walgreens project. Director Teague reported that the Planning Commission would have its first sketch plan review on March 23 for a project at 44 `h Street and France Avenue proposed by Noonan Construction. Minutes /Edina City Council Work Session /March 15, 2011 There being no further business, Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:34 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications & Marketing Director Minutes approved by Edina City Council, April 5, 2011 James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 2 o e t4 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. ll. A. From: Marty Scheerer, Fire Chief Fire Department Date: April 5, 2011 Subject: Request to Purchase Training Center 6th Floor Burner Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: February 22, 2011 Aril 30, 2011 Company Amount of Quote or Bid Kidde Fire Trainers Inc. (Sole Source) 1. $132,000.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Kidde Fire Trainers Inc. 1. $132,000.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This purchase request is to jointly purchase a 6th floor high rise fire simulation and a flashover burner simulator for the South Metro Public Safety Training Facility located at Braemar Park. The purchase would be a Joint purchase with our training facility partners, the City of Bloomington ($225,000.00) and the City of Eden Prairie ($192,000.00). The cost differential is prorated to the number of firefighters from each city. The fire simulators were intended. to be part of the facility in the original plans but were withdrawn to meet budget. The simulators are fueled by natural gas and have many advanced technology and safety features. The simulators are considered necessary for firefighter training and there are no other high rise or flashover fire simulators in the State of Minnesota. ' The building was designed and plumbed to accommodate the additional fire burner simulators. The cities of Bloomington and Eden Prairie have already approved the purchase. I would recommend this purchase; the City of Edina would see an increase in our investment to $550,000 when we acquire this technology jointly with our partner cities. The funding for this project would come from th Improvement Plan budget which received funding from the 2010 budget rplus. /! JI - Fire Signature De artment The Recommended Bid is within budget not within bu 4 John Wallin, Finance irector t—cotrNegl, Ojty Manag r o Le U \was REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. II. B. From: Marty Scheerer, Fire Chief Fire Department Date: April 5, 2011 Subject: Repair of Fire Department Pumper E -81 Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: NA NA Company Amount of Quote or Bid Premier Fleet Services (Insurance Company 1. $33,200.68 Approved) RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Premier Fleet Services 1. $33,200.68 GENERAL INFORMATION: This purchase request is to repair Fire Department Pumper E -81, a 1997 Pierce Quantum. This vehicle was damaged during an ice storm in December 2010. The vehicle sustained significant damage on all four sides of the vehicle when it slid out of control on Highway 62 after responding to numerous vehicle crashes. The damage from the crash is $14,396.39 which insurance will pay for less the deductable of $3000.00. The vehicle was in need of significant body repairs prior to the accident. We had received quotes as high as $80,000 to repair prior to the crash. Since the vehicle was going to require significant restoration due to the crash and be out of service, we inquired and received a quote to refurbish the pre -crash vehicle. The additional repairs are quoted at $18,804.29. The quote was significantly less due to the vehicle being already torn apart due to the crash repairs. The additional repairs should extend the life of the vehicle to approximately 2020. The cost to the City would be $21,804.29 and funding would come from the Fire Dept C tracted Repairs budget. G" Fire Signature Department The Recommended Bid is within budget not within Jo Wallin, Fina a Director Mott ea , ity . anager ow e v •'�'�Rpoxe,TE9� ,eaB AGENDA ITEM II. C. 2011 COMMODITIES PURCHASE CONTINUE TO 4 -19 -11 X No packet data [-] Oral presentation [-] Information coming owe ,o REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No: II. D. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer Date: April 5, 2011 Contract No. ENG 11 -5, Imp. Nos. BA -334, SS -460, STS -375, WM -511 & BR -7; Subject: Minnehaha Woods Nei hborhood Roadway Improvements & West 56th Street Bridge Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: March 22, 2011 May 23, 2011 Company Amount of Quote or Bid BASE BID + ALT A BASE BID + ALT B 1. Palda & Sons, Inc. $ 4,259,438.35 $ 4,259,604.97 Northwest Asphalt, Inc. $ 4,393,380.62 $ 4,368,054.38 Min er Construction, Inc. $ 4,725,805.05 $ 4,707,893.40 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Palda & Sons $ 4,259,438.35 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for street and utility improvements throughout Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood and the replacement of the West 56th Street Bridge over the Minnehaha Creek. The project includes reconstructing the existing roadways, adding curb and gutter, rehabilitating the sanitary sewers and watermain, upgrading the storm sewer systems, and rehabilitation the West 56th Street bridge. The rehabilitation of the West 56th Street bridge includes replacing the upper structure, deck and, railings, while maintaining similar aesthetics of the existing bridge. The Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway project was ordered by the Edina City Council at the January 18, 2011, Public Hearing, and is funded through special assessments and respective utility funds. The Feasibility Study overall project cost estimate was $6,611,000; the updated overall project cost is estimated at $5,607,143. The West 56th Street bridge project is included in the 2010 -2014 Capital Improvement Program and is funded through the storm water utility fund. The construction cost of the bridge included in the above bid is $131,580; the estimate in the CIP is $450,000. The plans call for a pipe- bursting technique to rehabilitate the watermain. Staff and consultant specified two different types, Alternative A & B, of pipe material for the watermain replacement. Alternative A is a HDPE pipe material and Alternative B is a PVC pipe material. The HDPE pipe material was used in the Country Club watermain rehabilitation. Staff is recommending awarding the project — Base Bid and Alternate A to Palda & Sons, Inc.. Palda and Sons, Inc. is the contractor that recently completed the Country Club project. zz� /w Engineering Signature a artment Recommended Bid is within budget not.within budget joKn Wallin Finance Dire c • NO `l��yM ager G: \ENGINE -1 \CONTRA- �1\2011\ENG11 — 4\ADMIN \MISC \Item II.D. Contract No. ENG 11 -5, Imp. Nos. BA -334, SS-460, STS -373, WM -511 n BR -7; Mi haha Wood eighborhood Roadway Improvements n West 56th Street Bridge.docx A DATE: March 31, 2011 . MEMORANDUM PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA TO: Scott Neal City Manager —,�,n FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE 6 Director of Public Works / City Engineer SUBJECT: Award of Bid for Contract No. ENG 11 -5: Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements I would like to bring to your attention that the watermain replacement for the above award of bid is not within budget as compared with the project listed in the 2011 -2015 Capital Improvement Program for Watermain Improvements UT -11 -001, the CIP budgeted $830,000. This CIP project is for watermain upgrades on the local roadway projects. The cost of the watermain replacement for Minnehaha Woods per the low bid is $1,066,188. However, utility funds are very similar to municipal state aid balances where we need to look at the running balance of the account. Reviewing all of the local roadway improvement projects since 2005 we have a current balance of $890,700 in the water fund, $2,788,300 in the sanitary sewer fund, and $4,902,260 in the storm sewer fund. An anticipated end of year balance for the respective utility funds based on current bids and updated costs, from the feasibility reports, are: Fund Projected 2011 end of year balance Water $ - 1,337,701 Sanitary $ 1,433,301 Storm $ 2,596,427 Note: combined fund balance for water and sanitary $ 95,600. Looking forward to other projects within the water fund we foresee that the water treatment plant proposed for the Southdale area will be delayed beyond 2015. This treatment plant was proposed in 2008 due to the anticipated redevelopment in southeast Edina. This treatment plant was proposed to treat water based on anticipated increase in volume, unlike Treatment Plant No. 6, which will be solving a current and future water quality issue. By delaying the construction of Treatment Plant No. 5 we will be able to free up approximately three to four million dollars. The original cost estimate for Treatment Plant No. 5 was $6,000,000, which was accounted for in the last two rate studies. Also, given that we have some flexibility with the CIP and that our combined balances for water and sanitary sewer funds are positive, I would recommend to the City Council that we go forward with this year's projects. Staff will then analyze future year construction projects to have more accurate costs for the 2012 -2016 CIP and utility rate study. GAEngineering \Contract Numbefst2 MENG 11 -5 Minnehaha Woods Street 8 Bridge ReconstructionTINAL DESIGMDESIGNUUtiilty funds120110331 WH -Edian to SN -Edina on CIP balance.doc o f LIU \• -W J • `O'1888 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. II. E. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer Date: April 5, 2011 Contract No. ENG 10 -13, Imp. No. WM -509; Gleason Road Water Tower Cleaning, Subject: Repairing and Painting Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: March 17, 2011 Mav 18, 2011 Company Amount of Quote or Bid ALTERNATE A ALTERNATE B 1 M.K..Painting, Inc. $ 449,000.00 $ 449,000.00 'assic Protective Coatings, Inc. $470,050.00 $ 460,050.00 idland Protective Coatings, Inc. $ 505,500.00 $ 505,500.00 4. George Kountoupes Painting Co. NO BID $ 512,400.00 5. TMI Coatings, Inc. $ 575,600.00 $ 576,600.00 6. PCI Roads, LLC $ 581,000.00 $ 513,000.00 7. Horizon Bros. Painting Corp. $ 662,950.00 $ 623,950.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: M.K. Painting, Inc. $ 449,000.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for cleaning, repairing, and painting of the Gleason Road Water Tower. This water tower was constructed in 1970; the current water tower exterior coating is over 16 years old as the interior coating is over 22 years old. This type of water tower rehabilitation is typically scheduled for late spring or late summer due to watering demands during the summer months. Therefore, the project specifications asked for prices for completing the work from approximately May 2 to July 8 (Alternate A) or from approximately August 1 to October 14 (Alternate B). The 2011 -2015 Capital Improvement Program budgeted $500,000 for this project. The project will be funded through the Water Utility Fund. The City's consultant for the project, Kollmer Consultants, Inc. is recommending that the City award this project to M.K. Painting, Inc. based off of their past work and. references. Staff recommends awarding Alternate A therefore having the water tower rehabilitated this spring. The Recommended Bid is within budget not withir Public Works Department G: \Engineedng\Contract Numbers\2010 \ENG 10 -13 Rehab Gleason Water TowerWDMIN \MISC \Item II.E. Contract ENG 10 -13, Imp No. WM -509 Gleason Road Water Tower Cleaning, Repairing and Painting.docx A, o e t 0 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF \ $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER lees To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. II. F. From: John Keprios, Director Park and Recreation Department Date: April 5, 2011 Subject: Contract 11 -01PK Chowen Park Playground Improvements Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: March 29, 2011 May 29, 2011 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. 1. Minnesota/Wisconsin Playground 1. $109.884.00 2. Fitol -Hintz Construction 2. $109,884.50 3. American Liberty Construction 3. $119,906.49 4. Blackstone Hardscape 4. $158,434.54 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: ACCOUNT #: Fitol -Hintz Construction 47070.6710 $109.884.50 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is for purchase and installation of replacement playground equipment for Chowen Park. As shown in the unapproved March 8, 2011 Park Board meeting minutes, staff utilized a different process this year in the design and selection of replacement playground equipment. The process began with two resident neighbors of Chowen Park who served as a small initial design committee followed by an Open House where letters of invitation were mailed to 333 households (those within 1,000 feet of Chowen Park). There were follow -up interactions with residents who chose to remain actively involved in the design process and the plans were altered to best meet those expressed needs. Ultimately the Park Board voted on the final plan to be bid and made one minor change which was to switch out a belt swing seat for an ADA approved tot seat for children with disabilities. Sealed bids were opened on March 29, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. at City Hall. Four bids were received; however, two of the four bids were disqualified for not meeting bidding requirements. Minnesota/Wisconsin Playground was disqualified for providing a bid bond in the amount of only 5 %; whereas, the specifications clearly call for a 10% of the base bid. Blackstone Hardscape was disqualified because.they did not submit a bid bond. The language in the "Instructions to Bidders" specifications state: -page 2 of 2- BID SECURITY Each bid shall be accompanied by a cash deposit, certified or cashier's check, or bid bond with a corporate surety authorized to contract as a surety in the State of Minnesota, in an amount of at least equal to ten percent (909,66) of the total amount of the base bid, payable to the City. as a guarantee that the bidder will enter into a contract with the City for the work described in the proposal, and the amount of the bid security of a successful bidder shall be forfeited to the City as liquidated damages in the event that such bidder fails to enter into a contract and furnish contractor's bond. Therefore, the lowest qualified bidder is Fitol -Hintz Construction with a bid of $109.884.50. We have found Fitol -Hintz Construction to be a reputable firm with the City of Edina as they have installed the playgrounds at both Alden Park and Heights Park. The warranty on the product is 100 years on locks (clamps) and uprights, 15 years on rotationally molded plastics and one year on the moving parts. If approved by City Council, the project will be completed by July 1, 2011. This is a 2011 Capital Improvement Plan project budgeted at $120,000. John Kep,44 Director This Recommended bid is within budget not Edina Park and Recreation Department PLEASE NOTE: These Minutes have not yet Been approved by the Park Board. Minutes of the . Edina Park Board March 8, 2011 Edina City Hall,.Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Bill Lough, Todd Fronek, Ellen Jones, Joseph Hulbert, Louise Segreto, Dan Peterson, Keeya Steel, Randy Meyer, Felix Pronove . MEMBERS ABSENT: David Deeds, Austin Dummer, Jennifer Kenney STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios; Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton. I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES Dan Peterson MOVED TO APPROVE THE JANUARY 11, 2011 PARK BOARD MINUTES,. -Todd Fronek SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. II. NEW BUSINESS A. Chowen Park Playground Equipment - Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that for the Chowen Park playground equipment they used a different process on their approach to the design and selection of playground equipment. He explained that Mr. MacHolda solicited volunteers to serve. on ,a small committee and asked them to come up with a plan they thought might work and then sent out a mailing to 333 households (those within 1,000 feet of the park) and invited them to an Open House. He noted that since the Open House Mr. MacHolda has continued to visit with the neighbors who were actively involved in the process and. showed a strong interest in the neighborhood. He stated that they did go through a couple of other revision plans until they found one that equally, satisfied their needs and.desires. Mr. Keprios pointed out that from a staff s perspective they feel. it's their duty to ensure that the final design is within budget, equipment.ls safe, -that it's a really good value for the community, that it meets ADA requirements and that it's properly sized. for its surroundings in the park. He indicated. that other step they changed is to bring it to the Park Board for.approval. Mr. Keprios commented that for the next project he would like to ask a Park Board member to serve on the neighborhood committee. .Mr. MacHolda stated that Jennifer Corniea and Matt Dubbe were the neighborhood committee members. He noted that at the Open House a resident, Angela Gadtke, informed the- committee that she thought the design was missing some toddler elements. He indicated 'that for the next week Ms.. Gadtke, Ms. Corniea, Mr. Dubbe, Game Time. representatives as well as himself made a series of revisions and came up with the final plan which everyone endorses. 1 Mr. MacHolda pointed out that in addition to what is seen on the diagram of the park in terms of playground equipment there are three trees, five benches, two trash receptacles and a pair of soccer goals. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the selection of the pieces wasn't simply done by what looked to be the most fun but kept in mind the obesity issue and so the equipment is a little more exciting, challenging and physically rewarding for kids. Ms. Jones asked if the neighborhood had a chance to see the final revised plan after the Open House to which Mr. MacHolda replied no. Mr. MacHolda indicated there were approximately 12 adults and five children at the Open House where there was a large drawing of the proposed plan. He noted there was good dialog and they did start the process of making a couple of revisions. He commented Ms. Gadtke really stepped forth from the community in stating that she felt there was a piece missing for the toddler age group. He noted Ms. Gadtke, Ms. Corniea and Mr. Dubbe early in the process branched to other neighbors that had toddler age children and made revisions so what they have today is a good representation of the neighborhood. Ms. Segreto commented that she does like the change in process so that it now includes the Open House and added that she thinks it broadens the bases of community consensus. She asked is it clear when the time for public comment is over, so that people feel if they don't get their comment in by a certain time it would not be considered because it's late. Mr. Keprios replied that the letter that was mailed out inviting neighbors to attend the Open House stated: "if, after reviewing and discussing the plan on Wednesday, February 16`h the neighborhood agrees with the neighborhood committee, the proposed plan will be placed on the Park Board's March 8`h, 2011 agenda for their approval. " The neighborhood was made aware there would be no follow -up Open House. Mr. Lough stated that he would like to support this process and all processes that would tend to involve a wider range of the community that the park would have an impact on which has been done in this case. He stated that the only caution he would urge, and it seems to have been done in this case, that you bring the process to a conclusion so that the public feels they have had the chance to make their comments. Mr. Peterson asked if there is any activity by senior citizens in the neighborhood where there is something in the park for them and secondly what is the life expectancy of the playground equipment. Mr. MacHolda replied that the current playground equipment at Chowen Park was installed in in 1991. He noted that the new equipment should easily last 20 years. As far as the diversity of the neighborhood once the letter went out he did hear from the senior population and when they found out who was involved in the neighborhood committee they were at ease. He pointed out that more trees and benches will be added which will be an enhancement for the older population to come and enjoy and sit and watch. Mr. Hulbert asked if the. soccer area will become a scheduled field to which Mr. ,MacHolda replied no. Mr. Hulbert asked if there is a plan for the rest of the parks beyond the current CIP as far as the playground equipment. Mr. Keprios replied there has been an ongoing plan that's in written form that shows it as a 15 and a 20 year replacement schedule. However, with the newer equipment with the exception of the wooden equipment seems to last about 20 years so they are pretty.much on a 20 year replacement!schedule. Mr. Hulbert.commented that he also likes the addition of the trees in there for the next generation. Ms. Angela. Gadtke,. 5 825 Drew Ave., stated she would like to commend the process and;, commend Mr. MacHolda for his work. She noted she was very,voeal at the Open House in trying to get.more activities and equipment for the younger children and Mr. MacHolda was .very open to suggestions. She indicated that she thinks they came to a consensus of a.plan that really represents the young families in their neighborhood as well as the families of children that are a little bit older. Mr. Meyer asked what is the warranty of the equipment which John Elder, the representative from Minnesota Wisconsin Playground, replied that the warranty on the product is 100 years on locks and uprights, 15 years on rotationally molded plastics and one year on the moving parts. Mr. Meyer asked Mr. Elder if he ever gets any objections to the one year on moving parts to which Mr. Elder replied no because if something is going to happen -it's going to happen within the first year. Mr. Elder explained to the Park Board the difference between an engineered wood fiber and a wood chip. With a wood chip you are at the mercy of whatever the person operating the chipper decides to throw in,.that.,day: leaves, branches, bark, limbs, etc. He indicated that engineered wood fiber is the shredded core of a hard wood tree and the benefit to that is it knits together to make more,of a static surface which complies with the ADA and provides a predictable impact safety surface. He added that it also allows for use of wheelchairs and walkers whether it's for someone who has ADA challenges or someone who is elderly with a grandchild. Mr.. Meyer asked how often the wood fibers are topped off to which Mr. Elder replied. the will be a top off every five to seven years. Mr °Hulbert asked is there anything in this facility that is directed towards children with developmental disabilities or special needs. Mr. Elder replied a lot of the rope based activities are quite often used for kids who, have some of the, ADA challenges as well as some of the cognitive disorders. He noted there are ground level events for children who have mobile disabilities such as steering wheels and the. like. He pointed out that thetire swing is something that is strongly pursued:for ADA purposes and is quite often used. for children with mobility issues because of the larger area that you are able to place the child onto. He indicated that for the swings they did two belt swings and two enclosed tot seats and the purpose behind that was because of the larger number of smaller children in that area. Mr. Elder commented that the toddler rocker as well as the see saw are also ADA compliant as.ground level events. He noted these are some of the things that are of the new age playgrounds where it's using different muscles and different motor skills which is especially helpful for kids whether it's autism or the spectrum disorders or any of the physical disabilities. Mr. Hulbert asked what about for children with disabilities that might like to swing but can't stay in a loop belt or won't fit into the enclosed tot seat. Mr. Elder replied right now there is nothing; however, it is equipped so that they are able to put in an adaptive seat. Mr. MacHolda stated that there was one on the original drawing but one of the parents who attended the Open House was concerned about the weight of that bucket. This person felt if a toddler wasn't paying attention it could really hurt a small child; therefore after the Open House they went to the two belt two bucket swings. Mr. Elder pointed out that there is a nature discovery table underneath one of the decks where kids are actually able to position themselves and it has a very tactile sensation because that is something that is especially attractive and calming for children with any of the sensory disorders. Mr. Hulbert commented that as a parent of child with special needs he thinks this is something that needs to be considered and if anybody has talked to anybody in that neighborhood that might be a user of that park their thoughts should be taken into consideration if they haven't been brought to the table. Mr. Elder replied absolutely and that is one of the things you will notice with their plan. They always meet the ADA requirements but usually they exceed it and added that when he puts a playground together he tries to keep those sorts of things in mind. Mr. Hulbert asked with this equipment for the swings if they wanted to add one of these two years down the road could they put that on that playground equipment to which Mr. Elder replied absolutely. Mr. MacHolda commented that they can easily swap out one of the belt buckets for the ADA swing. Mr. Fronek asked Mr. Elder if his company provides both the equipment and the installation to which Mr. Elder replied yes. Mr. Fronek asked if they are going to be within budget to which Mr. Elder replied the way the equipment is priced they will be within budget which does include installation. Joseph Hulbert MOVED TO APPROVE THE PROPOSAL AS OUTLINED WITH THE CAVEAT OF HAVING ONE OF THE BELT SWINGS CHANGED OUT FOR AN ADA TOT SEAT. Louise Segreto SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. B. On- Camera Meetings vs. Off - Camera Meetings — Mr. Hulbert indicated that he has received feedback from some members who feel an off - camera environment may be more conducive to dialog because they are able to sit around a table and look at one another. He stated that it may be a little more productive in the case of certain topics to have off - camera meetings and added that it would not require as much expense. Mr. Lough stated there are at least two broad areas in his mind where off - camera situations would facilitate their coming to eventual agreement about issues which may be more nettlesome. He indicated that he also thinks when they sit in an on- camera session there are different levels of understanding as to what the issue is and sometimes they are expected to act on something in a fairly short order manner. Therefore, he thinks one of the benefits of work sessions, which may be off - camera, is that they can absorb research and ask questions about the research as well as ask for follow -up research. He noted then they can get themselves to a level where they feel comfortable 4 and understand what's going, on and what they are being asked to decide upon. Mr. Lough stated that he would rather see more on- camera time used by the individual members to state what they think about their understanding of the issue and their opinion about what actions should be taken. He commented that also during work sessions they are able to sit in a more collegial environment and spend time not only collecting data but exchanging opinions. He stated that he's not saying ,they wouldn't do that in an on- camera session but he thinks it would allow them to form points of view around certain issues and to express those points of view with some degree of confidence and it doesn't take anyone by surprise per se and they are encouraged much more to do that. Ms. Jones indicated that she was thinking in terms of the questions that were on the letter that Scott Neal, City Manager; had sent out.' The first question was "Do you believe that filming your. Commission meeting, and subsequently rebroadcasting the filmed meeting on cable television, would change the manner in which commissioners or guests behave or participate :in your Commission meetings ?" She stated in response to the question she does actually get a little self - conscious and does think it can affect a free_ flow of opinions and attitudes; however, when it comes down to it she doesn't think it has a totally negative effect. She commented that when she wants to look into what's been going on in the city she looks through the minutes and feels as long as there are good minutes they don't need to be filmed. She also pointed out in this day and age when they have to watch every penny and the fact people are getting paid to film the -- meetings makes her hesitant about spending'taxpayer money on that. She stated she would be interested whether or not the community feels that this is a service they want their tax money spent on. Ms. Jones stated that another question that was asked was "'In 'what areas do you think it would be very important to have those filmed ". She stated her feeling is that any kind of public comment period. would be important to be filmed. Ms. Segreto stated she does agree with everything Mr. Lough and Ms. Jones said. She then asked Mr. 4 Keprios if they were to take some of their meetings and• convert them into work sessions that would not be televised is there a requisite number of public meetings ,that the Park Board must have to satisfy the ordinance requirements. Mr. Keprios replied no but did clarify that the Park Board could still have a meeting, not .necessarily a work session, that'snot on camera. He stated that he doesn't want to confuse work sessions versus meetings off - camera. He noted that mork sessions really are a singular agenda topic item that is one issue thai they are going, to work on.,He stated that. meetings are.when,they actually intend to take action as well-as take public comment but it doesn't have to be on- camera so there is a difference between an off - camera. meeting and a work session. Ms. Segreto asked Mr. Keprios if the City is receiving any public input as a re "sult of the meetings. being televised. Mr. Keprios replied that to his surprise there.are quite a few people that do watch it and from his own experience people do tell him that they've watched the Park Board meeting on TV. Ms. Segreto indicated that if the Park Board is taking a vote on something then she thinks it should be televised. If they are not taking a vote and it's ,truly a work session then they could cut back on the number of meetings that are televised. Mr. Keprios pointed out that the question for the Park Board is how important is it so they can watch it at home on TV versus reading the minutes. He noted that the action can take place whether the Park Board is on camera or not. He stated that 5 if the people want to be actively involved in their government then they need to be here. That is something you should consider as you are thinking about camera versus no camera, or perhaps there are only certain types of issues that require an on- camera meeting as is the case in at least one other community he is aware of. Mr. Fronek indicated that he would like to echo all of the statements previously made. He noted that he does think being on- camera does affect the manner that he conducts himself and he thinks it's sub - conscious. He stated when you're on TV and you're sitting up high he does think the manner he is conducting himself is different. He noted that whether it's an off - camera meeting or work session scenario they are at a round table, it's easier to have a discussion. He indicated that maybe Park Board members need to take on a little more burden or as Mr. Lough has eluded to a little bit more research and understanding of the issues that are presented before them. He stated they should have some sort of dialog among Park Board members and staff in a less formal environment so that when they are on- camera the facts are all out and everyone understands their opinion. Therefore, he thinks as a Park Board that first they will be more informed and second they will be able to discuss different factors with the people in the community. Mr. Hulbert indicated that when they had their work session last July he thought it was very productive and people were chiming in whenever they wanted and didn't have to worry about interrupting or touching their microphones. He stated that he thinks they could have more of them and if it ever evolved into something where they wanted to make a formal motion they would then bring it to the Park Board meeting. Mr. Hulbert suggested that maybe they look at forming smaller subgroups and try to tackle more things at the same time and then come back and report back to the Park Board like what Ms. Jones did with the CAT committee. Ms. Steel noted that the two issues that come to her mind are transparency and accessibility and Edina has done a good job televising the Park Board meetings as well showing it online. She stated that she does receive a -mails from people saying that they have watched the Park Board meetings either on TV or online so there are viewers out there. She indicated that to take that away from viewers in the age of twitter and social media she thinks it would really be a step backwards for Edina and she couldn't do that to their community members. She noted that people are not always able to attend their meetings for many different reasons so they also need to consider that. Ms. Steel commented that as far as work sessions they have a lot of issues that they need to work on and a lot of questions so she would like to have more work sessions where they are able to divulge into these issues and have that dialog because she thinks they are very productive. She stated if they are taking action on something that needs to be televised and they need to be up front with the community. Mr. Meyer gave a little perspective from his involvement with the School Board. He noted that about three years ago they went to approximately every other meeting being a workshop as opposed to a formal meeting and thinks that structure has worked well for them. He noted that they have a lot of ideas and interest in things they want to pursue but unless staff comes to the Park Board with proposal X they really don't have a way of articulating it in a general sense and feels that is what workshops are for. He stated that 9 he agrees with Ms. Steel and at School Board workshops they rarely pass an item, unless it is time sensitive, it goes back to the regular meeting as part of the minutes. Mr.' Meyer indicated that he disagrees with what said earlier about workshops having one agenda item. He commented that he thinks you, can come into a workshop and say okay, we are going spend 20 minutes on item A, 20 minutes on item B, and 20 minutes on item C; it doesn't need to be a single focus. He noted that they may want to think about some kind of regular schedule to start with to get into this type of process. Mr. Meyer indicated that he thinks if they are going to pass a motion it should be in front of the cameras at a televised meeting. Mr. Peterson stated that he agrees with Mr. Meyer and in response to Mr. Neal's third question,. "Do you believe that f lming.and rebroadcasting your Commission meetings is an important tool in communicating your Commission's activities and discussions with the public ?" that he does. He indicated that he thinks there is a ,lot of interest and that television has become the equivalent of a New.England town hall meeting except you don't have to go to City Hall you can watch it at home. He stated that he does like the idea that if there are no action items maybe they could get longer briefings from staff and a longer questioning period of understanding what the issues are. Mr. Pronove stated that in general he agrees with what has been said so far, but it seems to him that when they do have some basic questions they faint away from the camera. He indicated that at their last work session when one of the focuses was the golf course there were definitely more questions brought up. He noted that he felt a little more confident coming in knowing a little more about the golf course and knowing a little bit more about the concerns. He stated that he tends to shy away sometimes from basic questions he might need answered because other people might find it irrelevant. Therefore he thinks work sessions are a nice spot to get things out of the way but when they are on- camera they should definitely focus more on the more important kind of questions that they can't answer themselves because they need help from the community or even experts. He stated that he feels work sessions help for more basic questions and the more important and in -depth questions should definitely be brought up on- camera. Mr. Lough stated that after listening to everyone's point of view it seems they spend a lot of time asking questions of staff and having communication back and: forth between member and staff. He indicated that he thinks if they had more work sessions then maybe they would become more comfortable, looking at each other, asking questions of each other and even ibe, willing to express, to some degree, disagreement when, it's appropriate. He noted that he's not saying disagreement is. wrong, it's a matter of feeling more comfortable with one another to. do it and perhaps.that comfort would help them arrive at better decisions as a Park Board. He stated that he would like. to be able to exchange their views and get into some of these issues in a little more comfortable and direct way. He indicated that he thinks the public would benefit from this because he thinks it's more likely at that point.that they would then exchange views on- camera and it would be much more forthcoming about what they are thinking, what point of view they are taking and what perspective they are taking on a particular issue as they try to arrive at the correct decision for the community. 7 C. Recay of February 1. 2011 Work Session with City Council action plan) 1. Veteran's Memorial Future Maintenance Expenses — Mr. Hulbert reminded the Park Board that at the work session it seemed the maintenance expenses for the future veteran's memorial was a concern for some people. He indicated that they want to know what would be the city's burden for maintaining it. Mr. Keprios replied the discussion of future maintenance expenses will form its own calendar based on the design process and they won't know that until they have a design and it's been approved. He stated at that point the discussion will be who is going to cover the cost for the maintenance. He noted that he also thought what he heard at the joint work session was that they also need to come forward with what is the value of the land where it's going to be placed and the cost of any proposed restroom facility improvements if that becomes an added feature to the park. Therefore, they need to decide should that be the burden of the Veteran's Memorial Committee even though the restrooms currently serve the whole park, so they will need to have a discussion regarding that issue. Mr. Hulbert asked Mr. Keprios if the committee said something about having an Open House. Mr. Keprios replied that the City Council made it real clear they would like an Open House that we will host as well as hold a public hearing at the City Council level. He stated that the question for the Park Board is do you also want to have a public hearing at a Park Board meeting or just rely on input from the community beyond an Open House. He indicated that he is envisioning that once they have a design to bring before the community and answer their questions if the Park Board still feels a need to have a public hearing at a Park Board meeting, we can certainly put it on the agenda at that point. He noted what he heard from City Council is they want there to be an Open House and they definitely want to have a public hearing and specifically want to make sure they are aware of what the maintenance expenses are and what the burden on the tax payer is going to be. Mr. Hulbert asked if they have solicited design companies or architectural firms to submit proposals. Mr. Keprios replied that the City Council approved the contract with SEH Architects, and so far they have had one meeting with the Committee. The meeting was more of a fact finding, where does the committee want to go, what elements are they sure about, etc. He noted that there is still a long ways to go before a design will come to the Park Board. Mr. Keprios commented that he was going to ask the Park Board next month to see if they would like to have a liaison serve on the Veteran's Memorial Committee. He noted that he hasn't had a chance to discuss this with the chairman so he would like to give him the courtesy of a phone call first; however, please start to think about it and they can discuss it at next month's meeting. Mr. Meyer asked what sort of meeting schedule the committee is on to which Mr. Keprios replied the main committee typically meets the third Friday of each month at 7:30 am in the Mayor's Conference Room. He indicated that recently the Chairman sent him an e -mail asking if this would be an appropriate time to step up the number of meetings in the short term; however, he thinks there are enough sub committees that should be doing a lot of the work outside the main body that they should be able 8 to keep meeting once a month and added that the architect also seemed to think that was appropriate. 2. Facility User Fee Per - Participant — Mr. Hulbery asked Mr. Keprios is there or is there not going to be a study taken to determine activity by activity what the cost is for soccer versus softball versus hockey, etc. Mr. Keprios replied he is trying to recall if that was a request of the City Council to get into that level of detail because it's not going to be an exact science if that's the mission they are being-sent off to do. He noted that staff can certainly take a shot at it but if this is going to be a priority item they will not be able to have all four items on the same agenda because, there wouldin'l be enough time to get all of-the information to the Park Board. He pointed out that the participant fee isgoing to come down to is philosophically does the Park Board feel it should be covering the,expense for the majority of a particular sport or should they be subsidized like it is now. He stated that the per - participant fee will likely go up next year but it becomes a matter of how much. Mr. Keprios indicated that he thinks the Park Board may need some more background information in order to make an informed decision. In addition, they will also need to inform the athletic groups that this is under consideration. Mr. Meyer indicated that he didn't think the goal was necessarily to up the fees or fix it but rather what would be helpful initially is to be able to understand where their costs are and get a handle on how the expenses work. He noted that he thinks once they have that information they can start to think about what 'their long -term objective is and then they can see where they are subsidizing programs in some places, which may be just fine, but be able to make it a choice versus a random act. He indicated that from his perspective the most helpful, thing as a board member would be. to understand the overall dynamics of how it's currently structured, he's not so worried about getting down to the last nickel, it's more conceptually how are these costs rolling out and then have a discussion around it. He stated that he doesn't want to surprise the athletic associations and up all of their fees but, more importantly, at least understand does it make sense when they look at it. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that he can certainly take a shot at it if the desire is to try,to break it down sport by sport. He noted they are not budgeted that way and he would have to take their best estimate because they have a field budget and an outdoor rink budget and how much of that is specifically expense just for a hockey rink is something they can take a shot at and-then take the raw data as best they can and go from there. Mr. Meyer stated that he thinks before staff goes through a ton of work maybe the Park Board should discuss the process first so that Mr. Keprios is clear on whether we are giving direction or asking questions that make sense. We need to be clear about what it is we are asking for so that Mr. Keprios is not putting in a ton of work without being really sure about what ivis we are trying to accomplish. Mr. Fronek indicated that maybe it would help to see how the budget breaks out and see what is spent on fields and then try to formulate how many kids are in field sports and get a rough idea of where they are subsidizing. He noted that to Mr. Meyer's 0 point maybe get a little bit more tangible idea of where the expenses are so they can begin to drill down and not put a ton of burden on staff. Mr. Keprios replied that he would be happy to start with the budget and show on the big picture of what they have so that it's clear data to then break it down per sport and then have a discussion. Mr. Hulbert stated that he thinks this is something that would be good to discuss at a work session and talk about the data and work through the topic and later bring it to a Park Board meeting to take action. Mr. Fronek indicated that he also thinks that would be an opportunity to discuss philosophy and express opinions so they can start to back up the process. He commented that if he remembers correctly this started out as a good idea to start charging these people a dollar amount and then it's increased incrementally; however, that philosophical viewpoint hasn't been reevaluated. 3. Future of Edinborough Park and Centennial Lakes Park — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that this issue was requested by staff to be put on the Park Board/City Council joint work session agenda. He explained that Edinborough Park/Centennial Lakes started out with a trust fund that had approximately nine million dollars and in less than five years it will be down to zero. He noted they will be out of money because there is a subsidy every year and to cover the subsidy it comes out of the trust fund, it's like a train running out of track. He stated that they need to find a way to do one or more of three things: bring in more revenue, cut expenses or find another source of subsidized funding. He noted that from staff's view the last thing they want to see happen is to have it become another Town Square like St. Paul where it's sold and becomes private property. He stated that maybe there are a lot of other ideas of what Edinborough could be or should be. He noted that one of the things he heard would be to hire a professional consultant and added that he has already been hearing input from some City Council members as well as residents. Mr. Keprios stated that he would like to hear more input and said he can put together all of the data regarding their numbers of visits, how many are residents, etc. He pointed out that they are trying to do a little better job of breaking out where the maintenance and operating expenses are within the park itself as well as what are the options, how would it affect current contracts and agreements that are in place with those that own property around the area. He stated that it's a very large issue that is going to need attention soon and it's something that's on their radar screen as a high priority and would like the Park Board's input into the process. Mr. Fronek asked if Edinborough Park is a separate entity from Centennial Lakes Park as far as the trust fund is concerned to which Mr. Keprios replied they are of the same trust fund so they are considered one and the same. Mr. Meyer indicated that he would say this is probably their highest priority as far as understanding. He noted this would be a good workshop item to find out the history, where they are now and what the current time line is for the decision process. He commented that he thinks they could go from there because he doesn't know the history to understand possible solutions or the perspective on it so he feels that should be the first step. Mr. Peterson questioned how many people even know about the facility. He stated that a lot of municipalities collect e-mail addresses of citizens and maybe they could 10 start to do that in Edina. He noted there are a lot of ways to put a coupon on an e- mail. He also suggested that possibly they think about having the City of Edina or Park and Recreation Department have a table at the Farmer's Market at Centennial ` Lakes and feature what's available and maybe members of the Park Board could volunteer to be there for a couple of hours. This is one way people will know the incredible facilities that the Edina park system has to offer. 4. Naming of Parks and Facilities Policy - Mr. Hulbert indicated that maybe they should try to schedule a joint work session with the City Council to discuss Edinborough Park and Centennial Lakes. He noted he would also like to have a work session to discuss facility user fees and pick up where they left off at last year's July work session regarding the naming policy,and donations or maybe divide up into smaller work groups. Ms. Steel indicated that she likes the idea of dividing things up and she does understand the urgency of some of it but they do need to. be sensitive to staff time and asked Mr. Keprios how he thinks it could be best managed. Mr. Keprios replied that W& going to require that staff do quite a bit of research regarding Edinborough and Centennial Lakes which they are currently working on. He stated that he thinks it's premature for him to make promises of his staff without asking them just how long it's, going to take them before they are prepared to give Park Board all of the facts and information needed to come up with a plan but thinks they should be able to get it done within a couple of months. Mr. Keprios stated that they will not be able to cover. everything in one work session. He ..explained just for clarification the donation policy and the naming policy are totally separate but are certainly good topics. He stated that he would like the opportunity to do a little more research and thinks a two month period to pull the data together will give him plenty of time. Mr. Fronk noted that he thinks it probably makes sense to have the EdinboroughlCentennial Lakes work session first and then decide what they want to do in terms 'of any sort of sub - committee or group that's going to be formed. He stated that he thinks Edinborough/Centennial Lakes.. should be the top priority and the rest of the_ m seem less of a priority and once .they figure that out they can move forward. Mr. Lough asked since the facility user fee background materials can be prepared more - ,quickly than Edinborough/Centennial Lakes perhaps the. Park Board could get started on the user fees. He noted he would classify that as the second. highest priority. Mr. Keprios replied that if that's the agreement of the Park Board then staff will Ao their very best to have it in front of you within two months. Mr. Meyer suggested having a May workshop with the majority of the time being spent on Edinborough/Centennial Lakes. He noted if that timeline works then they could spend 30 minutes looking at the facility user fee in the big framework, not the details. Maybe just try to understand how the budget flows and then let Mr. Keprios know what they are looking for specifically. He commented that way Mr. Keprios 11 isn't spending a lot more time than what is required up front. Mr. Keprios replied that, if they need to, he thinks they could put the facility user fee on next month's agenda. Ms. Steel commented that she thinks the idea is just to get some background information so that they are able to develop some of their questions and decide what their priority questions are. She asked when the Park Board approves the fees and charges to which Mr. Keprios replied in September. Mr. Hulbert indicated so it may be possible to have a May work session and do a brief educational overview on facility user fees and Edinborough/Centennial Lakes and added that at some point in the upcoming year he would like to pick up where they left off last July with the naming of parks and facilities. III. OLD BUSINESS A. Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse Consultant - Mr. Keprios reminded the Park Board that the direction he received from the City Council at the work session was to start over with a more formal request for proposal process approach to hiring a consultant. He noted he was asked to submit it to everyone who has shown an interest in it to date and to further analyze if there are any other consultants out there that they should consider. Mr. Keprios put together a draft of request for proposal which gives potential consultants about a three week window to respond to it. He pointed out that it states the Park Board reserves the right to choose whatever consultant they feel has the best value to the community and not necessarily who is the lowest bid. It also states anyone who has expressed an interest who wants to submit a proposal is by law legally rightful to do so. Mr. Keprios asked the Park Board if they would like to have a couple of Park Board members volunteer to work with staff once the proposals are submitted to go over them. Ms. Segreto stated that she thinks it would be a good idea to have several Park Board members to -help staff weigh through the proposals. Mr. Fronek noted that he agrees and he would be happy to serve in that capacity. Mr. Hulbert asked Mr. Keprios if this is something they should do after a work session. Mr. Keprios replied that the proposal deadline is March 291h and explained that he would like to call a meeting to distribute the proposals to the volunteers so that a recommendation could be made at the next Park Board meeting. Mr. Hulbert and Ms. Segreto both stated they would like to volunteer. Mr. Lough noted that he is not volunteering but asked if the RFPs could be e- mailed to the other Park Board members as well so they could read them to which Mr. Keprios replied he would be happy to do that. Ms. Jones stated that she would like to add a couple of questions to the RFP because she wants it to be made really clear what it is they are trying to answer. Ms. Jones read her questions. "How do we change the Edina Golf enterprise from a money losing enterprise to one that makes enough money to reinvest in its own facilities "? If this is possible, how long would it take ?" "What do we need to do to make it happen "? "If it is not possible, what are our options, for example on -going taxpayer's subsidy, 12 privatization, partial sale of property, or whatever "? "The long range vision for the Edina golf enterprise is to make it one of the best if not the best public course in the market is this possible given the objectives stated above "? "What are some long range plan options to make this happen "? Ms. Jones stated that these are broad questions without;gettirig into details because she wants to make sure these questions are answered. Ms. Jones stated that in the scope of the study she would also like to add staff and compensation as separate line item.. She would like to ask the question "Are the right people in.the right positions for success ". She commented that these are some of the things that she would like to add. She indicated that she would also like to add to one of the sections on the back some kind of full disclosure because the Park Board did talk about the need to make sure that we are aware if there is any relationship with the city. Therefore, she would like to include.statement "The City of Edina is.interested in hiring a consultant who is independent, unbiased and without a conflict of interest. Please explain any relationships that the owners or principals or team members may have with the Edina Golf Enterprises, City of Edina ". She would like something like that added so they are told up front. Mr.. Keprios asked Ms. Jones for clarification on what it is she is asking the consultant to do with her question "Are the right people in the right positions ". Ms. Jones replied she wants them to use their. best judgment to evaluate whether or not they have the right peoplein the right positions because she would think they are working with many different kinds of golf enterprises and they will know whether or not we have the right management team, have the right people with experience in the pro shop with accounting principles. She stated we need to know if we have the capability of making this a successful enterprise. She commented that it's a tough question but she would like an unbiased person to come in and take a look at it because if they are looking at the whole.'enterprise she thinks that should be looked at as well. Mr. Keprios stated that he would take issue with the question for a document that becomes published and says that someone is not qualified to be in the position that they are currently working. He indicated that is more of a management and personnel issue. -and not for a consultant to address, they deal with .those things: at a management level and not in the-eyes of the public.,,. Mr. Kepri os pointed out that the other piece is he gets a little concerned with his own proposal in that it may be asking for more than! they are going to be able to afford. Ms.- Jones indicated that she can appreciate sensitivity but she is looking at the big picture,and would like to hear from the rest of the Park Board their opinions if this is a question on the table for a consultant to give. Mr. Keprios replied that'he totally agrees that the consultant will likely study and answer the question; "Do we have the right number of staff and the right number of.positions for the certain tasks that need to be done "; however, getting into qualifications and do they have the right personality for the job or whatever that is not something they should be asking a consultant to do. Mr. Lough asked Ms. Jones if the Park Board could have a copy of what she has just suggested distributed by e-mail and then he would invite the Park Board to get back to 13 Mr. Keprios with comments about what has been written. He stated that it articulates what they are trying to do, maybe it's not appropriate that the consultant upon further reflection comment on all of this but he thinks that it has to be taken under advisement. Mr. Meyer indicated that if the Park Board feels strongly do we have the right people in the right positions with the right skills then maybe they could filter that in a way that it goes to Mr. Keprios or Mr. Neal. He stated that if they are paying for that information and it's being gathered then they are making a mistake if they are not sharing that with the administration of the city. He commented that he doesn't need to know it and he doesn't think anyone on the Park Board needs to know it but if it's being collected it should be shared. Mr. Keprios responded that he believes that any information gathered is public information and wants to make sure that they don't mix personnel issues versus filling positions, such as, do we have the right number of positions for the tasks at hand and not get into personality and qualifications type of thing. Mr. Hulbert noted he thinks these are tough questions but are good questions and he thinks they are not necessarily totally unfair questions for taxpayers in Edina who the golf course belongs to and they may want to know some of those answers. He stated that he is curious to hear what he Park Board members think of Ms. Jones questions. He indicated they are being asked to approve an RFP based on the criteria and asked if they still want to do that or do they want to deliberate it for a month and think about it. Ms. Segreto stated that she would like another month to look at what Ms. Jones has put together and think about it. Mr. Fronek indicated in his view he would defer more to staff s judgment with the understanding that the Park Board and City Council as an advisory role they have to empower staff to allow them to operate facilities. He stated that right now they are at the point where the golf course isn't making money, and Ms. Jones first question was eloquently put "can this enterprise make money and are the right structures in place for this to make money ". He stated that as an appointed member of the Park Board he is uncomfortable getting into employment decisions with regards to the enterprise facilities. Mr. Keprios indicated that maybe instead of detailing what is in the scope of the study maybe you determine the questions and the consultant could say yes they can do it or these are things that would need to be studied to get you your answers. He noted that he thinks it would be worthy to wait another month. Mr. Lough asked Mr. Keprios if he could take a crack at rewording the RFP and take into account some of the questions that Ms. Jones has asked. Mr. Keprios replied absolutely and encouraged the Park Board members, after reviewing Ms. Jones questions in writing, to let him know if they have any additional questions because maybe there are other questions that they haven't thought of tonight and then he will come back at the next meeting with a rewritten RFP for Park Board's consideration. 14 V. PUBLIC COMMENTS Raymond O'Connell, 4612 Valley View Road, informed the Park Board there are two osprey boxes at Braemar Park; one has been in use since 2009 and has had two fledgings so far, 2009 and 2010. He noted that the reason he is here is because there is a pole on park property west of the ice sheets inside the fence of the lower lot, at Braemar. He noted that -it's a good pole, 45 feet long, and noted that Mr. Anderson and Mr. Swenson would like to get that up and there is a great spot for it practically in the middle of the course. However, where it's located is heritage grass which cannot be disturbed and there is signage there that states that. He stated that in the next couple of weeks, hopefully when the snow melts, he would like to get that pole transported, which everything can be done in house with a front loader, and put it in place. He noted that he doesn't want to go over Vince Cockriel, Park Superintendent, but he wanted to be sure that the Park Board knew about it. He explained that the design for the osprey boxes is to bring more notoriety to the parks and it is working, people like to watch them. VI. UPDATES FROM STAFF Mr.- Keprios informed the Park Board there isn't a lot to update on because he has been out of the office the last three weeks because of an illness but has slowly been working on getting back to full -time. He noted that he wanted to remind the Park Board that he will not be at the July Park Board meeting because he will be having a knee replacement and will be out of commission for the month. He noted that may be a good time to have a work session and Mr. MacHolda would be in attendance. VII. ELECTION OF OFFICERS John.Keprios opened up the floor for nominations for Chair of the Park Board. Louise Segreto MOVED TO NOMINATE JOSEPH HULBERT. RANDY MEYER MOVED TO CLOSE NOMINATIONS. TODD FRONEK SECONDED THE MOTION. Mr. Keprios.announced that Joseph Hulbert has been voted as Chair of the Park Board and congratulated him. John Keprios opened up the -floor for nominations for Vice -Chair of the Park Board. JOSEPH HULBERT MOVED TO NOMINATE KEEYA STEEL. TODD FRONEK MOVED TO CLOSE NOMINATIONS. DAN PETERSON SECONDED THE MOTION. Mr. Keprios announced that Keeya Steel has been voted as Vice -Char of the Park Board. VIII. PARK BOARD COMMENTS Joseph Hulbert stated that Janet Canton does an incredible job with her minutes because it's almost as though you write down what I'm trying to say rather than how I speak it, you do a wonderful job, thank you. MEETING ADJOURNED AT 9:00 PM 15 53' -0° SHELTER PROPERTY LINE BASKETBALL COURT NEW CONCRETE BORDER 175 UN. FT. BENCH ` / X28094 (13) 26089 , O IN- GROUND (PS) `� CU48IINNG V I /- 91884 TH`N �jNG / V e� 81324 CUMBER 81888 S1 KY \ 25003 81278 NATURE WHEELS HANGOUT 26058 / 81278 DISCOVERY COMBING 3 WAY 25081 / 91324 TABLE \ WN.L xSTEP CUMB�ING 61323 80023 (UNDER) 61143 1 WALL ' 10777 I 61328 PLATFORM GIANT WAVE SIDE 11 8141 \ TIRE SWING / WILDERSLIDE I 5, ,___I CUMBER LANK CROSS 1 TMa1DNl POD DOUBLE / (—� e I 2 I 0 ' -6' �AAI I MINI POD .1324 81203 26098 25062 29098 Tan STOOL \ 81324 81881 BG931 PLATFORM yam, E WIND 1 28102 \ 49009 WEB UPRIGHT 26101 TUFFCLAD ` — — / / L 81278 STEERING GIB CROSS I 2 -WAY WEE WALK 3173 BENCH UNK W/BACK (- — — — — — — — 8132) YAIEE1 PANEL CLOVER B BEAM I UNK HIGH STEPPER 1 I REGULAR N (ROUND I \ LEAF 3 WAY YX-PoO / \ TRANSFER 3 .3 CLIMBER STEP / 28024 ' POINT C� L-- - - - - -; fice59 4° BWECT 26075 / 56' -0° DOME SAFETY SURFACE ACCESS PANEL SWIVEL IN -GROUND ND 5446 SQ. FT. L \ ATTACHMENT I MEISTER ✓ \ ` / I 28082 TRAPEZE QUAD 8010 901G one am \� � 6ai� BELT SEAT BELT SEAT ENCLOSED 10T ENCLOSED TOT ZIP SUDE / PAC1lAGE PACKAGE SEAT PACKAGE SEAT PACKAGE \ \ 2 077 I 3 1/Y Q0. 3 1/2' 0.0. 3 1/Y O.D. 3 1/Y O-M ^ 25097 _ / \ XCELERATOR WALL \ 12583 FtxM 12558 SWING \ / SEE 62S A W I ` 1 J \ PRINETIME SWING ADO -A -BAY I \ I (D 3eo34 EXISTING in RUNNER / 1 TaoDLE I TREE / 2600 , r' I ''� 28009 28009 ' / I TUFFCLAD BENCH I I / ` 6' /BACK 9' BENCH /MK / 28M /BACK \m- R OUND (PS) 009 IN- GROUND — — — — TUFFCLAD r 6' (PS) BENCH N IN-GROUND D 18" DEPTH 200SQ. FT 106' -0' 0 10 20 40 NSCALE IN FEET Mfg. By Sold & Distributed By: PO Box 27328 - Golden Valley, MN 55427 Chown Park Minnesota Wisconsin 763.546.7787 1.800.622.5425 - n 763.546.5050 Edina, Minnesota Errichiag ChildhoodThroagh Play 01z E -Mail info @mnwiplay.com SCALE: 1' = 10' -0' 1 3/3/11 Ioo D51 0OJ6 THIS PRINT IS THE PROPERTY OF MINNESOTA WISCONSIN PLAYGROUND INC. AND IS NOT TO BE USED, COPIED OR REPRODUCED WITHOUT THEIR EXPRESSED WRITTEN PERIMISSION. o Fe CAT �y Cn • f��RP0 • Bee REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. II. G. From: John Keprios, Director Park and Recreation Department Date: April 5, 2011 Subject: 2011 EVAPCO Evaporative Condenser — Braemar Arena Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: NA NA Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Cool Air Mechanical 1. $54,768.00 2. Gartner Refrigeration 2. $76,500.00 3. American Industrial Refrigeration 3. $82,244.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Cool Air Mechanical $54,768.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is an emergency purchase and installation of a new evaporative condenser for' Braemar East Arena. This cooling tower evaporative condenser was scheduled to be replaced in May of 2011; however, the existing evaporating condenser for the East Arena failed beyond repair on March 21, 2011. Without an operating evaporating condenser, Braemar East Arena had to be shut down until the unit is replaced. Therefore, this became an emergency repair to minimize the shut -down period. ' City Manager Scott Neal approved this emergency repair Purchase Order on March 23, 2011. Cool Air Mechanical's price of $54,768.00 includes shipping, parts and installation and estimates completion by May 1, 2011 and comes with a one year warranty. This is a 2011 Capital Improvement Plan project budgeted at $75,000. I� John Ke i s, Director This Recommended bid is within bu get Edina Park and Recreation Department not within budget C, REPORPRECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. III. A. From: John Keprios, Directo V Action Park and Recreation De artment F-1 Discussion ® Information Date: April 5, 2011 Subject: Gypsy Moth Presentation, Lucia Hunt, Minnesota Department of Agriculture ACTION REQUESTED: The Minnesota Department of Agriculture has identified a Gypsy Moth infestation in a small area of southwest Edina. Of the 136 -acre area of infestation near Highway 169 and Highway 62, the majority of the infestation is in Minnetonka. Gypsy Moth Unit Supervisor Lucia Hunt from the Plant Protection Division of the Minnesota Department of Agriculture will give the Edina City Council a presentation about the infestation, the plans for treatment and process of notification. No action is requested of the Council on this agenda item. INFORMATION/BACKGROUND: In the spring of 2011 the Minnesota Department of Agriculture is planning to treat a small area of southwest Edina for a discovered Gypsy Moth infestation. The greatest area of treatment is in Minnetonka. A complete description of treatments can be found on the Department of Agriculture's website at www.mda.state.mn.us /gypsymoth. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture will be mailing notifications to residents in the affected area. The attached bulletin has been mailed to addresses in -and around the treatment blocks. Proposal for Gypsy Moth Management Twin City Metro Areas, Minnesota, February 2011 Coon Rapids Treatment Andover Cbot1 Rapids ,Minnetonka Treatment Minnetonka Edina Eden Pr lrie ur os right Hennepin M anetonka Treatment Conn Rapids Treatnnent City W Csfam Treatment Rart►Sriy f Carve[ Scott 5 10 -.raq City of Grant Treatment �r14 �Kel+ - h I _ t '= 1 I f - � �.' Lake E1a14 4.5 1 The Mimiesota Department of Agriculture (MDA), in collaboration with federal, state, and local partners, is proposing to eradicate gypsy moth populations in Hennepin, Washington, and Anoka counties in the St. Paul/Mirmeapolis metropolitan area. Surveys in 2010 revealed small pockets where monitoring traps caught extremely high numbers of moths. These results, combined with the trap records of previous years, prompted MDA, the USDA's Animal Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA's Forest Service and local officials to develop a proposed treatment project for 2011. A complete description of the treatments as proposed will be available on MDA's website, www .mda.state.mn.us /pvpsymoth. Paper copies will also be available from MDA, USDAAPHIS' Plant Pest Quarantine office, or mailed upon request. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT of AGRICULTURE Are gypsy moths similar to forest tent caterpillars (FTC)? Similar to FTC, gypsy moth often defoliate ex- tensive areas, feeding on many of the same species, including quaking aspen, birch, oak, and basswood. However, FTC is a native insect and has effective and abundant natural en- emies to keep populations in check. FTC outbreaks in the Lake States are cyclical and typically last for 3 -5 years then subside for 8 -12 years. In oak - dominated stands, the gypsy moth outbreaks last 2 -5 years or more. De- foliation by gypsy moth larvae starts and ends a lit- tle later in the season than FTC defoliation, possibly extending into mid July. In aspen- dominated stands, gypsy moth outbreaks may build and decline faster than in oak stands, ac- cording to observations in Michigan. Gypsy moths, unlike FTC, will feed on and defoliate some co- nifers, especially if they are growing alongside a favored host such as oaks and aspen. Young conifers do not survive complete defoliation events. FTC caterpillars appear earlier in the spring than gypsy moth and have two parallel blue stripes down their backs with a pattern of white "footprints" or "keyholes" running be- tween them. What is a gypsy moth? The European gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.) is not native to the United States. After being introduced in Massachusetts in the late 1800s, gypsy moth has continuously moved westward and southward and is now established as close as central Wisconsin. It is a serious defoliator of forest, shade, fruit and ornamental trees across much of the Northeast. Gypsy moth caterpillars are voracious eaters and can strip trees of their leaves, stressing the trees sometimes to the point of death. The preferred host species include oaks, aspen, paper birch, basswood and willow, which are all very common trees in Minnesota. High numbers of gypsy moth caterpillars can cause a substantial public nuisance, a Photo Credit: University of Minnesota reduction in tree growth, branch dieback Department of Entomology and tree death. This damage to forests diminishes environmental quality and may affect human health and local economies. Widespread gypsy moth outbreaks can alter water quality, wildlife habitat, microclimate, and soil fertility. I I I I I I I I I I I I III I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I H I I I I I III I I H I I I III I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I till I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I III I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I III How do we manage gypsy moth? In order to reduce current populations of gypsy moths and slow the growth of future generations of this forest pest, MDA proposes to treat a total of about 1500 acres of land with a biological insecticide called Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki, or Btk. Three treatment blocks have been identified and named for the municipality that contains them: Minnetonka, City of Grant, and Coon Rapids (see map on page 1). Forests in the proposed treatment areas include many of the trees species considered susceptible to gypsy moth defoliation. IIIIIII RII IIIIII 1111111 111111 IIIIIIIIIHIIIIIIIIIIII till IIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIJIIIIIIIIII IIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII I III I I till IIIIIII How does Eradication work? Apart from counties in the extreme northeast and southeast portions of the state, Minnesota's gypsy moth infestations are treated as isolated populations subject to eradication. The goal of an eradication program is to completely eliminate gypsy moths from the environment. Two aerial applications of Btk have been shown to significantly reduce the gypsy moth populations. The federal Slow the Spread program has been successful in keeping gypsy moth out of our state for years by treating comparable populations to the east, MDA's annual survey detects and monitors these outlier populations which are often the unintended consequence of human movement. We have benefited greatly by both eradication and slow the spread actions and can help protect our own state as well as those to the west and south of us by implementing the proposed treatments. Using data collected each summer, MDA tracks the presence of gypsy moth in Minnesota. Based on this monitoring, we determine the extent of gypsy moth populations, and whether and what types of treatments are needed. If left untreated, gypsy moth infestations can build and spread quickly. I ProjWed Gypsy fr ah $pr+esd In 20 Years With STS Q. Projected Gypsy MOM $WNW In 20 Years Wffl nirt STS Dark shaded counties are infested as of 2007; light shaded counties will become infested over the next 20 years. Why continue to try to control gypsy moth? Throughout Minnesota, the 2010 gypsy moth survey captured over 4,000 moths, a substantial reduction from years past. These results, combined with the trap records of previous years, prompted MDA, its federal partners, and local officials to develop the proposed treatment project for 2011. Similar treatments have been used extensively in the U.S. to eradicate gypsy moth. Treatments made soon after the discovery of new populations can delay a costly, full -scale infestation and protect the urban forest's health, local property values, and the quality of outdoor recreation activities. Visit the MDA website www.mda. state.inn.us /ggypsymoth for more details on gypsy moth management. Will I be charged for treatments? No. The Minnesota Department of Agriculture will work with federal, state and local officials and residents to carry out these treatments at no cost to homeowners. Funding will be provided by the State of Minnesota and the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Total cost of treatment is about $30 -$37 per acre for Btk and about $7 -$15 per acre for mating disruption. Can I provide input on this management proposal? The public is invited to submit comments in writing to MDA. Comments received by March 15 will be most useful for identifying any issues and alternatives in the environmental assessment. Contact information for MDA is provided below. What happens next? Federal environmental law (the National Environmental Policy Act) requires that an enviromnental assessment be pre- pared for this project. An environmental assessment is being completed to assess the potential effects to the environment. One environmental assessment will be written to cover all eradication sites in Minnesota. It will include cumulative effects with references to all sites in analyses and conclusions and will respond to comments received during the scoping period. MDA is preparing the enviormnental assessments in cooperation with USDA APHIS and the U.S. Forest Service - -State & Private Forestry (S &PF). The agencies will prepare and issue an environmental assessment describing all of the alterna- tive methods considered for controlling gypsy moth in the project area and analysis of associated environmental effects, as well as a decision identifying the selected management action. A final environmental assessment is expected to be released in April. It will be posted on participating agency websites and will be mailed to those who comment on this proposal. Separate decisions from the S &PF and USDA APHIS will be signed before the treatment project begins. r Information about Btk What is Btk? A biological insecticide called Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki (Btk) is proposed for three blocks covering local government -owned and private lands. The active ingredients are crystalline protein toxins formed by naturally- occurring bacteria. The proteins become toxic when eaten by certain susceptible caterpillars like the gypsy moth. When ingested, Btk is broken down and paralyzes the caterpillar. The caterpillar stops feeding and dies within a couple days. Btk is broken down naturally by sunlight so two applications about a week apart are needed to make sure all caterpillars are exposed to the bacteria. When is Btk applied? The proposed Btk treatments will take place in May, 2011. For best results, the treatment generally starts very early in the morning. It is possible that you may be awakened by the noise of a low -flying aircraft. We apologize in advance for any inconvenience this may cause, but the aircraft should be over your area for only a brief time. Pets may be spooked by low -flying aircraft noise, so we recommend keeping them indoors during the time when your area is treated. Exact dates and times depend greatly on weather conditions and insect development. Notification will be made 7 -14 days in advance of any treatments through various media outlets including local newspapers, TV and radio. MDA staff will be on -site to oversee the treatment. MDA's Arrest the Pest Hotline (888 -545 -6684) will be updated with treatment information frequently. You can also find information on treatments by following the MDA on Twitter at www.twitter.com /mnagriculture. 11111111 1111 [1 ]1111111111 llllllHIIII How is Btk applied? Btk formulations are applied with aircraft operated by licensed applicator pilots. Aerial treatments are at low altitude (-50 feet above the treetops). The aircraft are calibrated to be sure the product is applied at the proper rate and are equipped with the latest available technology, including Global Positioning Systems to help to ensure application accuracy. Non - forested areas such as large fields, stretches of pavement, and open bodies of water, are excluded from the treatments. What are the environmental effects of Btk? Btk is not activated in humans or other mammals; however, it does affect some butterflies and moths, such as the gypsy moth and tent caterpillars. To have any ill- effects, caterpillars must be actively feeding within approximately two weeks of treatment, they must eat the Btk, and they must be susceptible to the bacteria. We work with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to identify and minimize impacts to any threatened or endangered species that might be affected by these treatments. Btk is produced from a bacteria found in soils, plants and insects worldwide. It is cultured by fermenting grains and potatoes with fish or cornmeal, a process similar to brewing beer. The final product contains water, the active ingredient (Btk), leftover growth medium, carbohydrates, and other ingredients approved as food additives. The product breaks down quickly in sunlight, but is extremely potent to gypsy moths and can kill nearly 100% in treated areas under proper conditions. How can 1 help? MDA officials and their partners are asking for full cooperation from residents in and around the proposed treatment area. We will need to access private property to set, check, and remove monitoring traps starting in June through September. Please do not remove trees, tree limbs, firewood, or any other item stored outdoors that may be contaminated with gypsy moth egg masses. A link to a self - inspection checklist of items to look at can be found at www.mda.state.mn.us /v-vvsvmoth. If you see signs of gypsy moth infestation outside of the proposed treatment area, please contact MDA with details. What are the human-effecfs-of-MV Numerous studies have documented the low risk of Btk for humans, pets, and other species. Btk is a. common product that is readily available and inexpensive. It presents a very low risk to the environment and is approved for use in organic farming. Attempts are made to avoid applying Btk to sites where sensitive, threatened or endangered species of moths and butterflies exist. Evaluations have been made and no known sites of sensitive, threatened or endangered species of moths and butterflies, overlap with this year's proposed Btk treatments. The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) has prepared the following information to answer frequently asked questions about health risks from Btk: [A • Btk has been used safely for more than 40 years to control insects in the United States, Canada, and other parts of the world, on agricultural crops and forestry projects, including gypsy moth eradication projects in metropolitan areas such as Chicago and Vancouver. • Btk is used because is causes a specific, toxic process in caterpillars (i-.e. larvae). The process (a protein mechanism) that causes toxicity in caterpillars in not present in humans or other - mammals, regardless of age, and exposure to Btk poses a low health risk for humans. • Btk is a biological control method that is an alternative to chemical pesticides. Unlike a broad - spectrum pesticide, Btk has a very narrow target range so it will not disrupt the balance of nature. • ; Research shows that the level of Btk in air decreases to very low levels within 30 to 90 minutes after an aerial application. Two hours after an application, Btk concentrations in the air are typically below measurable levels. If you have individual health concerns about exposures to Btk, contact your physician or other health care professional. For general questions about health risks or steps to prevent or reduce exposures to Btk, see the MDH website at: ww<w.health. state. mn .us /divs /eli/pesticide/bt.h`tmI or call 651- 201 -4899. �.._f.n-- '� >{yF^ - z .,� d ,alt""" -rt 5 �r fps" SCR.. r •, ,w Pt_'.""F» %. v^- c;:._._,......__.... ..._,._,..— ,.�_�...��^'���..?", r. •', .�'U �, 1 y f x How do I avoid exposure to Btk? M �i b Even though Btk is considered low risk for humans some people may choose to avoid ex- g � P P Y y posures by staying indoors or leaving the area entirely during treatments. MDA will offer l.: a advance notification of the time that the treatment will occur. The treatment product has no known health effects for humans, but there may be a slight misty residue on outdoor objects immediately.after the application. The residue will not dam- age your car's finish, but you may wish to park your car indoors to avoid residue from landing on it. 1 To minirriize•exposure: 1. Stay indoors during, and for at least 30 minutes after treatments, with windows and doors y to your home and vehicles closed to allow droplets to settle out of the air. jM 2. Wait until the treatment has dried before touching vegetation. a = "; 2 3. Residue from the product may. accumulate on your car, house, outdoor play equipment, or lawn articles. Btk is easiest to remove shortly after application so simply spray or hose off the items with water. :. 4. Wash exposed skin with soap and water if direct contact with the spray droplets occurs. If material gets into your eyes, flush with.water for 15 minutes. 7. There will be no formal presentation at these locations. ire invite you to take advantage of one - on -one time with several experts from participating agencies that will be available to explain the treatment proposal and answer your questions. Where can I find out more? MDA and its partners are holding open houses to provide information about the gypsy moth, trapping data, and the proposed treatments. Public comments on this proposal are solicited through these open houses or in writing. Comments received by March 15 will be most useful for identifying any issues and alternatives in the Environmental Assessment. The public is encouraged to attend and comment on the treatment proposal, or contact us with questions or comments using our contact infonnation on the back of this bulletin. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1] 1111111111111 H I I I IIIIIIII[Jill till IIIIIIIIt1111111t11111t111111111 It I If III 1 11111111[III I I1iil 11llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll�l�llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll�llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllit111 Contact Us: Minnesota Department of Agriculture Nv\vNv.i,nda.state.mn.us/.vypsymotli, Email: gypsy.moth @state.mn.us "Arrest the Pest" Hotline: 651- 201 -MOTH (6684) or 1- 888 - 545 -MOTH (6684) In Accordance with the Americans With Disabilities Act, an alternative format is available upon request. TDD: 1- 800/627 -3529 An Equal Opportunity Employer I III I H I I I I I I Mill I I I i III I I I I III I till t i l l I I I III I I I I I I I I III I till[ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 l i l l i l l I I III I I I I I I I I I I I J I I I I I I I I I I I I 1111111111 [1 1 1[ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Connect with Us: To track the latest news on gypsy moth treatments, follow the Minnesota Department of Agriculture on Facebook ww- w.facebook.com /mnaizriculture and Twitter www.twitter.com /mnaericulture. A=QMINNESOTA DEPARTMENT cs AGRICUL"URE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT of AGRICULTURE Minnesota Department of Agriculture Plant Protection Division 625 Robert St. N. St. Paul, MN 55155 -2538 I Akwo OR (Lymantria dispar) is an exotic, invasive moth that defoliates trees. It prefers oak, aspen, paper birch, basswood, and willow. Defoliation by high numbers of gypsy moth can reduce tree growth and lead to tree death. This damage can diminish environmental quality and impact local economies. The gypsy moth is abundant in Michigan, eastern Wisconsin, and the eastern U.S. and Canada. It is spread by people inadvertently moving egg masses on firewood, outdoor gear or vehicles. Please do not transport firewood. The gypsy moth is not established in Minnesota. But, high numbers have been trapped in this area. 1 den Pla. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, an alternative form of communication is available upon request. TTY: 1 -800- 627 -3529 VIDA is an equal opportunity employer and provider. 1'.This area will be treated on (date range): .) 7 The Minnesota Department of Agriculture (MDA) and USDA will treat areas in the metro (see rnap) this spring with an application (via low- flying aircraft) of Btk. Btk targets gypsy moth caterpillars with two applications in late spring. Application usually begins at sunrise. However, some pets and horses may be spooked by low- flying aircraft, so we recommend you keep them indoors during the time of treatment. islvnL501A ■ »�„r+ Updated February 2011 Quick Facts... Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is a naturally occurring bacterial disease of insects. These bacteria are the active ingredient in some insecticides. Bt insecticides are most commonly used against some leaf- and needle- feeding caterpillars. Recently, strains have been produced that affect certain fly larvae, such as mosquitoes, and larvae of leaf beetles. Bt is considered safe to people and nontarget species, such as wildlife. Some formulations can be used on essentially all food crops. • ;'' © Colorado State University Extension. 11/99. Revised 12/08. www.ext.colostate.edu N S E C T S E R I E S Bacillus thuringiensis no. 5.556 by W.S. Cranshaw I (Revised 12108) Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is an insecticide with unusual properties that make it useful for pest control in certain situations. Bt is a naturally occurring bacterium common in soils throughout the world. Several strains can infect and kill insects. Because of this property, Bt has been developed for insect control. At present, Bt is the only "microbial insecticide" in widespread use. The insecticidal activity of Bt was first discovered in 1911. However, it was not commercially available until the 1950s. In recent years, there has been tremendous renewed interest in Bt. Several new products have been developed, largely because of the safety associated with Bt -based insecticides. Properties Unlike typical nerve- poison insecticides, Bt acts by producing proteins (delta - endotoxin, the "toxic crystal ") that reacts with the cells of the gut lining of susceptible insects. These Bt proteins paralyze the digestive system, and the infected insect stops feeding within hours. Bt- affected insects generally die from starvation, which can take several days. Occasionally, the bacteria enter the insect's blood and reproduce within the insect. However, in most insects it is the reaction of the protein crystal that is lethal to the insect. Even dead bacteria containing the proteins are effective insecticides. The most commonly used strain of Bt (kurstoki strain) will kill only leaf- and needle - feeding caterpillars. In the past decade, Bt strains have been developed that control certain types of fly larvae (israelensis strain, or Bti). These are widely used against larvae of mosquitoes, black flies and fungus gnats. More recently, strains have been developed with activity against some leaf beetles, such as the Colorado potato beetle and elm leaf beetle (san diego strain, tenebrionis strain). Among the various Bt strains, insecticidal activity is specific. That is, Bt strains developed for mosquito larvae do not affect caterpillars. Development of Bt products is currently an active area and many manufacturers produce a variety of products. Effectiveness of the various formulations may differ. Disadvantages Bt is susceptible to degradation by sunlight. Most formulations persist on foliage less than a week following application. Some of the newer strains developed for leaf beetle control become ineffective in about 24 hours. Manufacturers are experimenting with several techniques to increase its persistence. One involves inserting Bt toxic crystal genes into other species of bacteria that can better- survive on leaf surfaces (e.g., the M -Trak formulation of san diego strain). The highly specific activity of Bt insecticides might limit their use on crops where problems with several pests occur, including nonsusceptible insects S _ (aphids, grasshoppers, etc.). As strictly.a stomach poison insecticide, Bt must.be eaten to be effective, and application coverage must be thorough. This further limits its usefulness against pests that are susceptible to Bt but rarely have an opportunity to eat it in field use, such as codling moth or corn earworm that tunnel into plants. Additives (sticking or wetting agents) often are useful in a Bt- Bt-based products tend to have .a application to improve performance, allowing it to cover and resist washing. shorter shelf life than other insecticides. Since Bt does not kill rapidly, users may incorrectly assume that it is ineffective a day or two after treatment. This, however, is merely a perceptual problem, because Bt- affected insects eat little or nothing before they die. Bt -based products tend to have a shorter shelf life than other insecticides. Manufacturers generally indicate reduced effectiveness after two to three years of storage. Liquid formulations are more perishable than dry y formulations. Shelf life is greatest when storage conditions are cool, dry and out of direct sunlight. Advantages The. specific activity of Bt generally is considered highly beneficial. Unlike most insecticides, Bt insecticides do not have a broad spectrum of activity, so they do not kill beneficial insects. This includes the natural enemies of insects Unlike most insecticides, Bt insecticides (predators and parasites),, as well as.beneficial pollinators, such as honeybees. do not have a broad spectrum Therefore, Bt integrates well with other natural controls. For example, in activity, so they do not kill beneficial insects. Colorado, Bt to control corn borers in field corn has been stimulated by its ability to often avoid later spider mite problems. Mite outbreaks commonly result following destruction of their natural enemies by less selective treatments: Perhaps the major advantage is that Bt is essentially nontoxic to people, pets and wildlife. This high margin of safety recommends it's use on food crops or in other sensitive sites where pesticide use can cause adverse effects. Insects Controlled by Bt Kurstaki strain (Biobit, Dipel, MVP, Steward, Thuricide; etc.): Vegetable insects • Cabbage worm (cabbage looper, imported cabbageworm, diamondback moth, etc.). • Tomato and tobacco hornworm. Field and forage crop insects r European corn borer (granular formulations have given good control of first generation corn borers). • Alfalfa caterpillar, alfalfa webworm. Fruit crop insects • Leafroller. Perhaps the major advantage is that Bt • Achemon sphinx. is essentially nontoxic to people, pets Tree and slu-ub insects and wildlife. • Tent caterpillar. . • Fall webworm. • Leafroller. • Redhumped caterpillar. Spiny elm caterpillar. • Western spruce budworm. • Pine budworm. • Pine butterfly. Israelensis strains (Vectobac, Mosquito Dunks, Gnatrol, Bactimos, etc.) • Mosquito. Black fly. • Fungus gnat. Bt is used in agriculture as a liquid applied through overhead irrigation systems or in a granular form for control of European corn borer. Figure 1: Alfalfa webworms killed by Bacillus thuringiensis. San diego/tenebrionis strains (Trident, M -One, M -Trak, Foil, Novodor, etc.) • Colorado potato beetle. • Elm leaf beetle. • Cottonwood leaf beetle. Application The greatest use of Bt involves the kurstaki strain used as a spray to control caterpillars on vegetable crops. In addition, Bt is used hi agriculture as a liquid applied through overhead irrigation systems or in a granular form for control of European corn borer. The treatments funnel down the corn whorl to where the feeding larvae occur. Many formulations (but not all) are exempt from pesticide tolerance restrictions and may be used up to harvest oil a wide variety of crops. This also makes Bt useful in applications where pesticide drift onto gardens is likely to occur, such as treating trees and shrubs. The exceptional safety of Bt products also makes them useful where exposure to pesticides is likely during mixing and application. To control mosquito larvae, formulations containing the israelensis strain are placed into the standing water of mosquito breeding sites. For these applications, Bt usually is formulated as granules or solid, slow- release rings or brickettes to increase persistence. Rates of use are determined by the size of the water body. Make applications shortly after insect eggs are expected to hatch, such as after flooding due to rain or irrigation. Bt persistence in water is longer than on sun - exposed leaf surfaces, but reapply if favorable mosquito breeding conditions last for several weeks. Although the israelensis strain is quite specific in its activity, some types of nonbiting midges, which serve as food for fish and wildlife, also are susceptible and may be affected. For information on mosquito control, see fact sheet 5.526, Mosquito Management. Use of Bt (israelensis) for control of fungus gnat larvae involves drenching the soil. Bt applied for control of elm leaf beetle or Colorado potato beetle (san diegoltenebrionis strain) is sprayed onto leaves in a manner similar to the formulations used for caterpillars. Bt does not control shore flies, another common fly found in greenhouses. Table 1: Primary strains of Bacillus thuringiensis used in managing insects. Bacillus thuringiensis strain(Common name). Susceptible insects aizawi Many Lepidoptera larvae kurstaki Many Lepidoptera larvae israelensis Larvae of mosquitoes, black flies, fungus gnats japonensis Larvae of scarab beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) tenebrionis (sandiego) Larvae of leaf beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomeldiae) CrylAb delta- endotoxin 1 Many Lepidoptera larvae Cry3Bbl variant 1 Corn rootworm larvae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) 1 Only used in production of genetically modified crops 'Colorado State University Extension Colorado State University, U.S. Department of Agriculture, and Colorado counties cooperating. entomologist and professor, bioagricultural Cooperative Extension programs are available to all without discrimination. No endorsement of sciences and pest management. products mentioned is intended nor is criticism implied of products not mentioned. ,-k Bee 1 tit Cn REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item III. B. From: Scott Neal City Manager Action Discussion Information Date: April 5, 2011 Subject: PROPOSED Modification of the City Council Meeting Agenda ACTION REQUESTED: Discuss proposed modification of the City Council agenda. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: I distributed a proposed modification of the City Council's meeting agenda during the City Manager's Report at the Council's March 15 meeting. The Council asked that the proposal be placed on the April 5 meeting agenda for discussion. The goals of the proposed meeting agenda modifications are as follows: Move the Community Comment portion of the meeting from near the end of the meeting to hear the beginning. I have attached an analysis of Community Comment prepared by Council Member Bennett, which Members might find helpful as you consider whether it's best to continue this aspect of the Council meeting on or off camera. Or, for that matter, at the beginning or end of the meeting agenda. 2. Group the proposed Consent Agenda items together so that those items are easier to keep track of for all of us. 3. Group the perfunctory administrative actions of the Council earlier on the agenda to allow for the Council to get to the items earlier in the meeting that visiting citizens might be more interested in, such as public hearings. 4. Adds an element of formality to the start of the meeting with the Pledge, of Allegiance. The Pledge of Allegiance is not a required aspect of a public government meeting in Minnesota. In my experience, more cities do it than don't do it, but it is not inappropriate or a violation of public meeting decorum to have a meeting without it. It is simply a suggestion as a way to settle the start of the meeting and to provide a uniform act to focus our collective attention on the importance of the city's business. This is a matter that is at the discretion of the City Council. RECOMMENDATION: Neither the state, nor the federal'governments prescribe an agenda format for City Council meetings. Roberts Rules of Order, the accepted protocol for public meetings of City Councils in Minnesota, deems the meeting agenda to be the property of the body. The Council is in control of this matter. The suggestions that I have incorporated into my proposal are just that — suggestions. They are based the 600+ city council meetings that I have participated in during my 22 years as a city manager. If the Council is comfortable with the current Council meeting agenda, then there is no reason to change. If the Council is interested in a different format for your meeting agenda, then I would be happy to help you create a new standard. !f a i I� Public Comment Facts In 20o7; 2oo8, 2009 and 203.0 the Council held 96 regular meetings. No one appeared to speak during public/community comment at S3 meetings (55%). One person appeared to speak at 21 meetings (22 0/0). Two people appeared to speak at seven meetings (8 %) Three to five people appeared to speak at nine meetings (9 %) More than five people appeared to speak at six meetings (6 %) Using past community comment as a predictor, if each speaker represents five minutes of comment time, the Council needs to set aside: No time for public comment 55% of the time Five minutes for public comment 22% of the time Ten minutes for public comment 8% of the time Up to 25 minutes for public comment 9% of the, time More than 25 minutes for public comment 6% of the time If 30 minutes is set aside for comment, it will not be needed 94% of the time. All other concerns that have been stated are assumptions not suggested or validated by the data People don't want to comment on camera because they are shy. First, data shows a broad range of residents have commented'on a variety of topics. It does not appear that there is an epidemic of shyness. Second, if the goal is to improve accessibility to the Council, this can be done,,through other means, such as by improving the City Council section of the website to include photos, bios and direct email links. People like their three minutes of fame. One resident commented four times over the four =y ear. period.. Three residents commented three,times each. Four' residents commented twice'each. Knowing, these individuals, their organizational affiliations and the nature of their comments, it is not the presence of a camera that is bringing them to speak. Meefiin�s are too lon4• Community comment does not contribute even a second to the length of a meeting 55% of the time. Another 30% of the time, it adds ten minutes or less. People use Community Comment to comment on an issue in advance or after a public hearing In seven meetings of 96, speakers attempted to address issues that either had been the subject of a public hearing or would be. They were directed to bring their comments back to be heard at the public hearing. 209.7. 2-4 regular meetings ® At 7.o meetings, no one spoke during public /community comment • At 9 meetings, i person spoke • At z meetings, z people spoke • At 3 meetings, 3 -5 people spoke • At o meetings, more than 5 people spoke 2008 24 regular meetings • At 3.5 meetings, no one spoke during public/cornmunity comment • At 2 meetings, 1 person spoke • At 3 meetings, 2 people spoke • At i meetings, 3 -5 people spoke • At 3 meetings, more than 5 people spoke 2009 24 regular meetings • At 12 meetings no one spoke during public/community comment • At 8 meetings, s person spoke • At o meetings, z people spoke • At 2 meetings, 3 -5 people spoke • At 2 meetings, more than 5 people spoke 2010 24 regular meetings • At 3.6 meetings, no one spoke during community comment • At 3 meetings, x person spoke • At 2 meetings, 2 people spoke • At 2 meetings, 3 -5 people spoke • At i meeting, more than 5 people spoke PUBLIC/COMMUNITY COMMENT 2007-2011 Sources: Agendas and Minutes of Regular Meetings of the Edina City Council 2007 -- 2009: On agenda as "Public Comment," immediately following Public Hearings. May 3.9, 2009: Renamed "Community Comment" and moved later in the agenda, following Reports/Recommendations, effective June z, 2009. January 2, 2007 (4 speakers) ® Two residents concerned about Heritage Preservation issues in the Country Club District ® One speaker criticizing the dating service Great Expectations e One resident requesting review of the City's construction noise standards. Subsequent review led to revision of the ordinance on 6/05/07. January 16, 2007 (z speaker) ® One resident inquiring about assessments for proposed sewer project. February 6, 2oo7 (no.one appeared to comment) February 20, zoo? (no one appeared to comment) March 6, 2007 (no one appeared to comment) March Zo, 2007 (1 speaker) o One resident requesting that all residents be more aware of wetlands issues and the function of the watershed districts. April 1, 2007 (z speakers)' • One resident recommending establishment of a design review board • One resident urging adoption of the 2005 World Summit Outcome Document. Request directed to the I-IRRC. April 17, 2007 (no one appeared to comment) M.Ay 1, Zoo no one appeared to comment) Ma )L;_1,�20P7 _,.(1 speaker) • One resident spoke about inaccurate page on City website. June ,, 2007 (1 speaker) Eagan resident thanked Council for his daughter's just- completed internship with the City's Communications Department. June IQ, 2007 (no one appeared to comment) July, 2007 (no one appeared to comment J x7, 2007 (2 speakers One speaker representing Sprint/Nextel stating they were working with City staff to install a tower at Kojetin Park One resident explaining his neighborhood's opposition to the proposed tower August 7, 2007 (t speaker) One resident, bearing petition from 29 neighbors on Alden Avenue requesting City help with the condition of property on which a home had been torn down for redevelopment, August 21, 2007 (5 speakers) • Five residents of Dalrymple Road, requesting City assistance with parking and pedestrian issues created by school and athletic event - related traffic. Member 4, 2007 (x speaker) • One resident of Halifax Avenue, requesting that Halifax be reconstructed sooner than scheduled to provide traffic calming, Mayor directed him to the Neighborhood Traffic Management Plan application on the City's website. September 18, 2007 (no one _appeared to comment) October 2, 2oo7 (3. speaker. Residents of Oaklawn Avenue came to speak about residential massing and were advised they would be allowed to testify at a scheduled public hearing, 2-3/21/11 October 16, 2007 (5 speakers) ® One resident requesting review of public comment policy o One resident presenting a petition for the France Avenue sidewalk ® Three residents requesting City assistance with problem water. November 5, 2007 (s speaker ® Voter Service Chair for the Edina League of Women Voters requested that'notes and minutes from the Comprehensive Plan Update Task Force be posted on the City's website. November 20, 2007 (no one appeared to comment) December 4, 2007 (1 speakerl ® One resident stating that residents needed to have a greater voice in government. December 18, 2007 (no one appeared to comment) 2007 Recap 24 regular meetings 0 At 10 meetings, no ;one spoke during public/community comment (42 %) S At 9 meetings, 1 person spoke (38 %) - ® At 2 meetings, 2 people spoke (8 %) ® At 3 meetings; 3 -5 people spoke (12 %) ® At o meetings, more than 5 people spoke (o %) 200.8 January 2, 2008 (no one appeared to comment January 15, 2008 (no one appeared to comment February 4, 26o8 (4 speakers) p Three residents asking for a recall of the City Council February 1q, 2oo8 (g speakers ) 1 3- 3 /2l /ll v Nine residents in opposition to traffic calming in Country Club March 3, 2008 (2 speakers) One resident asking whether a speaker may comment on an item he or she asked to have removed frorn the consent agenda One resident representing the BETE asking for guidance on the Blue Cross/Blue Shield grant March 18, 2oo8 (2 speakers) One resident raising concerns about preliminary rezoning/preliminary development plan for 5146 Eden Avenue. Resident told she could not comment because a public hearing had been scheduled for May. One resident seeking to appeal his public health /housing violations. Also told he could not comment because a public hearing had been scheduled. April 1, 2oo8 (no one appeared to comment) April 14, 2oo8 (no one appeared to comment) May 6, 2oo8 (16 speakers) 0 13 speakers on Opus/Public Works • 1 resident raising concern about violation of Conditional Use Permit • 1 resident asking that the City keep residents updated on the W. 70`h study • 1 resident thanking EEC and volunteers for their work at the Energy Fair May 20, 2oo8 (no one appeared to comment) June 3, 2oo8 (6 speakers) Six residents concerned about redevelopment at Interlachen Country Club (maintenance building) June 17, 2oo8 (no one appeared to comment) July i, 2008 (no one appeared to comment) July j2oo8jno one appeared to comment) August 4, 2oo8 (no one appeared to comment) 4-3/21/11 August 3A, 2oo8 _U sagakgrl One speaker requesting a legally binding deed to the City of Edina. Mayor said request could not be honored. September 2, 2oo8 (no -oi2 appeared to comment) September :L6, 2008 (no one appeared to comment) October 7, 2oo8 (z speakers). (minutes not posted.on line) One resident reporting on activities of the Bike Edina Task Force and early planning for the Three Rivers Park District trail One resident requesting the Council resolve issues with broadcast and webcast of Council meetings October 21, 2oo8 (i speaker) One resident asking for an expansion of opportunities for residents to comment during meetings November 3, 2oo8 (no one appeared to comment) November 18, 2oo8 (no one appeared to comment) December 2, 2oo8 (no one appeared to comment) December 16, 2oo8 (no one appeared to comment) 2oo8 Recap 24 re.gular.meetings o At-i.5 meetings, no one spoke during p,ublic/community comment (63%) At a. meetings, :1 person spoke (8%) At .3 meetings, 2 people spoke (12,5%) e At 'z meeting, 3-5 people spoke (4%). 0 At 3 meetings, more than five people spoke (12.5%) 2009 5-3/2.1/111 January _6,_20o s speaker ® One resident raising concerns about upcorning Town Hall meeting format Janq 20, 200q (i speaker) m One resident suggesting format for boards and commission interviews February 3, 200q (no one appeared to comment) February 17, zoo i speaker) Garbage hauler raising concern over sign not allowing trucks to turn onto residential street during certain times of day March �, 200A 6 speakers) Five residents with concerns about sewer backup on Wooddale. Council put topic on agenda for a later meeting. One resident regarding police response to an incident at Southdale. March n, 2009 (i speaker) One resident asking that staff reports/plans be posted online to be available to residents prior to meetings A ril , 2009 (7 speakers) Seven residents regarding poor quality of Cotes Pond and supporting submitted petition for restoration project April ?z, 200 3 speakers) (minutes not posted online) Aide to Congressman Erik Paulsen giving contact information One resident thanking staff for assistance with utility reconstruction in Country Club District and asking for use of new Heritage Preservation guidelines One resident requesting information about the process to be used to amend the zoning code to bring it into compliance with the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update May_5,_2ooc�..(n_o. o.ne appeared to comment: Maur z9i2U�_.L._s�ea_kerl 6- :3 /21 /l 1 One resident expressing concerns about chemical weed control at Lewis Park June 2, 2009 (i speaker) e One resident asking for publication of the proposed code amendment regarding accessory buildings June 16, 2009 (no one appeared to comment) July.7, 2009 (no one appeared to comment] July 27, zooa (1 speaker) ® One resident suggesting changes to the pet registration ordinance August 1, 2oog (3 speakers) • One resident wanting information about the proposed 3RPD trail • One resident requesting notification of the outcome of 612o Brookside • One resident addressing the Council regarding signs . August 18, 200q (no one appeared to comment) September 1, -2009 (no one appeared to comment September 15, 200q (5 speakers) One resident asking that the City approve the World Mayors'and Local Government Climate Protection Agreement and that the City cover his expenses to attend the Copenhagen Summit * One non -resident asking about award of bid and directed to correspond with City Engineer Houle * One resident requesting signage and limitation of use of walkway to Heights Park * 'One resident objecting to early - morning blower noise from Edina Country Club * One resident representing FCC Board explaining use of blower to clear course for 7 a.m. tee times and offering to meet with resident October 6, 2009 (no one app_eared_to_c_ornment.) 7- 3/2]/1.1. October 20, 200q (no one appeared to comment) November 2 zo no one appeared to comment) November 17, 2009 (no one appeared to comment) December 1, 200 (no one appeared-to comment) December 15 200g (no one appeared to comment) zoo9 Recap 24 regular meetings m At 12 meetings, no one spoke during public /community comment (50 %) • At 7 meetings, -1 person spoke (30 %) ® At o meetings, 2 people spoke (o %) • At 3 meetings, 3 -5 people spoke (12 %) • At 2 meetings, more than 5 people spoke (8 %) 2010 January 5, 20-10 (no one appeared to comment January 29, 2010 (1 speaker) • One resident requesting, on behalf of herself and neighbors, a mill and overlay of their street February -1, 20 10 (no one appeared to comment) February -16, 20-10 (no one appeared to comment) March a, 20-10 (no one appeared to comment) March 16, 20-10 (q speakers) • One resident representing the Edina League of Women Voters, regarding the LWVE study on access to public facilities • One resident reporting resolution of a route issue with Metro Transit • One resident regarding residential building setback requirements and requesting a tree ordinance • One resident supporting a tree preservation ordinance that would regulate eradication of invasive buckthorn and regarding the search process for a new city manager 8- i /21/1 1 I ® One resident regarding the search process fora new city manager, opposing change in process for consideration of a Certificate of Appropriateness, and supporting the appointment of Bob Kojetin as an ex officio member of the HPB e Four residents regarding the search process for a new city manager April 6 2010 (no one appeared to comment) April 20, zoso (no one appeared to comment) May 4, 2010 (2 speakers o Two residents regarding the use of chemicals to treat .weeds at Lewis Park, potential airborne pollution and, impacted aquatics May 18, 2o10 (no one appeared to comment. June 1, 20-10 (3 speakers) o Three residents opposing Three Rivers Park District's proposed regional trail June 15,.2010 (4 speakers) 9 Two residents supporting the regulation of emission of wood smoke O One speaker concerning potential Richfield traffic impacts of proposed CVS ® One resident asking Council,to assure public input process, before revision of .. Comprehensive Plan July 6, 2610 (2 speakers) One resident concerning adverse impacts of designated bicycle routes One resident asking if comments could be emailedJ6 Council July 20, 2010 (no one appeared to comment) August 2, 2010 (1 speaker Business adviser for Club kid requesting City's assistance to resolve issue of SAC units to. be charged at new location August %Z, 2010 (i speaker) One resident speaking for Public Art Committee presenting Picture of two art gifts to City to be placed on the Promenade 9 -3/2 1 /11 September 7, .o:.o (no..one appeared to comment September 21, 20 -10 (no one appeared to comment) October 5, 2010 (no one appeared to comment) October 1q, 2010 (no one appeared t0 commei,t) November 1, 2010 (no one appeared to comment) November 16, 2010 (no one appeared to comment) December Z, 20-10 (no one appeared to comment) December 2 -1, 2010 (no one appeared to comment) 2oso Recap 24 regular meetings • At 16 meetings, no one spoke during community comment (67 %) • At 3 meetings, one person spoke (13 %) • At 2 meetings, two people spoke (8 %) • At 2 meetings, three to.five people spoke (8 %) • At 1 meeting, more than five people spoke (4 %) 10 -3/2) 1/11 o e 7� Cn .1� �O roRPOep- �86e REPORPRECOMMEN RATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item III. C. From: Scott Neal City Manager Z Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: April 5, 2011 Subject: PROPOSED Business Subsidy Policy ACTION REQUESTED: Approve proposed business subsidy policy. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The City of Edina does not currently have a Business Subsidy Policy. Minnesota Business Subsidies Act (the "Act "), Minnesota Statutes, Sections 116J.993 through 116J.995, requires cities to adopt criteria for awarding business subsidies. This policy is intended to comply with the Act. The purpose of a public subsidy granted to a private business is to incent a private business to make a positive business action in the community that it would not otherwise do but for the granting of the public subsidy. With respect to subsidies, the determination of the number of jobs to be created and the wage levels thereof shall be guided by the following principles and criteria: A. Each project shall be evaluated on a case by case basis, recognizing its importance and benefit to the community from all perspectives, including created or retained employment positions. B. If a particular project does not involve the creation of jobs, but is nonetheless found to be worthy of support and subsidy, it may be approved without any specific job or wage goals, as may be permitted by applicable law. C. In cases where the objective is the retention of existing jobs, the recipient of the subsidy shall be required to provide reasonably demonstrable evidence that the loss of those jobs is imminent. D. The setting of wage and job goals must be sensitive to prevailing wage rates, local economic conditions, external economic forces over which neither the grantor nor the recipient of the subsidy has control, the individual financial resources of the recipient and the competitive environment in which the recipient's business exists. E. Because it is not possible to anticipate every type of project which may in its context and time present desirable community building or preservation goals and objectives, the governing body must retain the right in its discretion to approve projects and subsidies which may vary from the principles and criteria of this policy. F. The City Council shall conduct a public hearing in response to a request for public subsidy prior to the Council's approval of said subsidy. I have adapted this policy from one that was originally produced by the League of Minnesota Cities and then subsequently modified by a number of Minnesota cities. The State Legislature granted City Councils a large degree of discretion with crafting a local policy that fits local customs and preferences. 4 �91N��f� O V C� v g �y 0 at � leesss REPORURECOMMEN DAT'ION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item III.D. From: Scott Neal City Manager Z Action ❑ Discussion Information Date: April 5, 2011 Subject: PROPOSED Tax Increment Finance Policy ACTION REQUESTED: Approve proposed Tax Increment Finance (TIF) Policy INFORMATIONIBACKGROUND: The City of Edina does not currently have a Tax Increment Financing Policy. For the purpose of this policy, the "City" shall also include the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA), which assists in a variety of housing, redevelopment, and economic development activities for the City of Edina. General TIF Definition: • The City of Edina has the authority to use Tax Increment Financing (TIF) pursuant to Minnesota State Statutes. TIF uses the increased property taxes generated by new real estate development within tax increment financing districts to pay for certain cost associated with the development. The complete TIF Act can be found in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174 — 469.179 Policy Purpose: • Establish criteria and guidelines for how Tax Increment Financing (TIF) is utilized in Edina. • Help insure that TIF assistance is used in a consistent and equitable manner. General TIF Policies: • The use of TIF will only be considered for projects that qualify and meet the general use of law as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174 — 469.179. • The use of TIF will be considered on case by case basis for projects that help accomplish the City's goals for housing, redevelopment, and economic development described in its Comprehensive Plan, Economic Development Strategies, and other related policy documents approved by the City Council. • TIF may be considered to encourage, stimulate, and attract desirable development and /or redevelopment that would not occur without the use of TIF. • TIF will be provided only on a pay -as- you -go (PAYGO) basis. . • The City reserves the right to approve or reject the use of TIF, the amount of TIF, and the total term, on a case by case basis, taking into consideration established policies, project criteria, and demand on services in relation to the potential benefits from the project. • Applicant will pay for all legal and consultant costs associated with the preparation, processing, review and actual use of TIF. Applicant will submit to the City a deposit equal to the total estimated costs for legal and consultant fees. The City will draw upon these funds to pay all related expenses. • Applicant will also pay to the City a separate non - refundable application fee of $2,000 to reimburse staff costs and cover all other City related costs associated with the processing the TIF request. • The loss of any governmental aid to the City (penalties) resulting from the formation of a TIF district will be minimized to the greatest extent permitted by law. The project will assume the cost of any penalties or contributions resulting from formation of a new TIF district. • Projects utilizing TIF are responsible for paying their share of Fiscal Disparities contribution from the project. • The City's Financial Advisor shall prepare the TIF plan and the applicant will provide to the City and its financial advisor all information necessary to conduct a financial analysis of the proposed project. • The TIF agreement will include "look back" provisions to ensure that the TIF was actually needed or will be reimbursed unless otherwise determined by the City Council. • The provision of TIF is contingent upon receiving all other necessary project approvals for the City. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND (cont.): I have adapted this policy from one that was originally produced by the League of Minnesota Cities and then subsequently modified by a number of Minnesota cities. This proposed policy would be fairly characterized as a conservative policy. For example: 1. It does not provide up -front or speculative TIF assistance. It allows only PAYGO TIF assistance. 2. It requires the use of "look back" provisions in TIF agreements that allow for the City to recapture the TIF assistance if it can be demonstrated that it was not actually needed. 3. It requires applicants for TIF assistance to pay for all costs associated with the development of the TIF agreement up front through application fees and pre - action deposits. A TIF policy is desirable for staff and applicants alike. It provides a basic deal framework for those early discussions between staff and applicant which can be very important in an economic development opportunity. oy Le g �o REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item III. E. From: Scott Neal, City Manager Action ® Discussion ❑ Information Date: April 5, 2011 Subject: PROPOSED Sports Dome ACTION REQUESTED: Discussion of subject and direction to staff. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: There are a group of Edina residents who wish to develop an indoor sports facility for recreational and competitive athletic activities. Representatives of the group have met with City staff, School District staff and interested parties from local youth athletic associations. The project advocates are interested in moving their project ahead, but also want to pursue a partnership with the City and School District first. The School Board discussed the matter at their March 21 meeting. The Board has requested the following information from the project advocates: • Completed needs assessment • Project's purpose and mission • Proposed plans, including possible sites, a business plan, administration /management proposal, project time frame and construction and operating costs • The project advocate's expectations of the District; such as access, cost share, rental costs, operations assistance and management input • How the project will be managed during construction and after construction • Sites, locations and examples of similar projects I believe the Council should have a similar discussion about this potential project. The Council should receive the same information from the project advocates that is being prepared in response to the School District's questions. I believe that staff should be directed to interact with the project advocates as much as necessary to prepare the requested information, and that a joint meeting of the School Board, City Council and project advocates be scheduled later this spring /summer to discuss the proposed project after the requested information has been prepared. me � 9�? REPORT /RECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. 111.17 From: Michael Nibbe, Lt. Edina Police Department ® Action ❑ Discussion . Information Date: April 5, 2011 Subject: Ord. No. 2011 -03 Amending Checks Section 100.11 Regarding Background ACTION REQUESTED: The Police Department recommends that the City Council approve Ordinance No. 2011- 03 an Ordinance amending the Edina City Code concerning background checks. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: In February the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension (BCA) audited our use of CJIS. We were advised that the City of Edina needed an ordinance to authorize us to access, through the BCA Minnesota computerized criminal history, public data and driver's license history background checks on employees, applicants for employment, volunteers, and applicants for many city licenses. The police department requests the adoption of Ordinance No. 2011 -03 which amends the Edina City Code to allow for the use of BCA records and DVS records for: • Background Checks on employees • Applicants for employment • Volunteers • Applicants for City Licenses: Intoxicating liquor, wine, 3.2 malt liquor, refuse haulers, tobacco, peddler, charitable gambling, solicitor, and massage. M� ORDINANCE NO. 2011- 03 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING BACKGROUND CHECKS THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Chapter'1 Section 100 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following subsection: 100.11 BACKGROUND CHECKS: The purpose of this Section is to authorize the City of Edina acting through the Police Department to access through the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Minnesota Computerized Criminal history public data and driver's license history background checks on employees, applicants for employment, volunteers and applicants for the following City licenses: intoxicating liquor, wine, 3.2 malt liquor, refuse, haulers, tobacco, peddler, charitable gambling, solicitor and massage. The City may conduct comprehensive background investigations, including but not limited to accessing data through other automated and non - automated sources and contacting references. Before the restricted private data of the investigation are undertaken, the person must authorize the Police Department in writing to undertake the investigation and to release the information to the City Manager, and other City staff as appropriate. If a questioned identity situation occurs, fingerprint verification shall be obtained. Should the City reject an applicant's request for employment due, partially or solely, to the applicant's prior conviction of a crime, subject to the exception set forth in Minnesota Statutes Section 364.09, the City Manager shall notify the applicant in writing of the following: (A) The grounds and reasons for the denial; (B) The applicable complaint and grievance procedure set forth in Minnesota Statutes Section 364.06; (C) The earliest date the applicant may reapply for employment; and (D) All competent evidence of rehabilitation will be considered upon reapplication. The City may periodically conduct a driver's license inquiry upon employees or volunteers where possession of a valid driver's license is a qualification of the position. ro SECTION 2.. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2011. City Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 2011- 03 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE ►LC= T_TH20] :TO] I fik, I9X6]:1 X01 THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Chapter 1 Section 100 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following subsection: 100.11 BACKGROUND CHECKS: The purpose of this Section is to authorize the City of Edina acting through the Police Department to access public data in the Bureau of Criminal Apprehension's Minnesota computerized Criminal History and to make thFeugh the BuFeaw „f GF*Fn*Ral AppFehe RSOGn river's license history background checks on employees, applicants for employment, volunteers and applicants for the following City licenses: intoxicating liquor, wine, 3.2 malt liquor, refuse haulers, tobacco, peddler, charitable gambling, solicitor and massage. The City may conduct comprehensive background investigations, including but not limited to accessing data through other automated and non - automated sources and contacting references. Before the City seeks access to restricted private data of }hc investigaW^ aFe undeFtakeRl the person must authorize the Police Department in writing to undertake the investigation and to release the information to the City Manager, and other City staff as appropriate. ad ideRtity situatiep , fingeFpFint . If the identity of the employee or applicants is in questions, verification shall be sought by fingerprint analysis. Should the City reject an applicant's request for employment due, partially or solely, to the applicant's prior conviction of a crime, subject to the exception set forth in Minnesota Statutes Section 364.09, the City Manager shall notify the applicant in writing of the following: (A) The grounds and reasons for the denial; (B) The applicable complaint and grievance procedure set forth in Minnesota Statutes Section 364.06; (C) The earliest date the applicant may reapply for employment; and (D) All competent evidence of rehabilitation will be considered upon reapplication. The City may periodically conduct a driver's license iRgUi check upon employees or volunteers where possession of a valid driver's license is a qualification of the position. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2011. City Clerk �1NA, oftlu •,v v • REPORT /RECOMMFN nATUIN - - -- - - - - -- - -- - . .r.. To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item III. G. From: John Keprios, Director ® Action Park and Recreation Department Discussion Date: April 5, 2011 Information Subject: Park Board Subcommittees ACTION REQUESTED: The Park Board Chairman recommends that the City Council approve his request to permit the Park Board to form a subcommittee to study association fees and fee related matters such as the Senior Center; a subcommittee to study the donations policy and establish a naming of parks and facilities policy; and a subcommittee to review responses to the Golf Course Request for Proposal. The Chairman further recommends that the Park Board be permitted to include other residents who are not Park Board members to serve on the subcommittees. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: As stated in Ordinance No. 2011 -02 An Ordinance Amending the Edina City Code Concerning Boards and Commissions: 1500.05 Committees and Subcommittees A. Establishment. A board or commission may, with specific approval of the Council or pursuant to its bylaws, establish committees, subcommittees, committees of the whole or working groups that include members of the board or commission and additional persons as requested by the board or commission. Unfortunately, the Park Board does not have established Bylaws at this time; however, that matter will soon be on the Park Board's agenda for consideration. At the March 8, 2011 Park Board meeting, three members expressed an interest in serving on a subcommittee to review outside consultant responses to the Braemar Golf Course Request for Proposal. On March 9, 2011, Chairman Joseph Hulbert sent staff an email requesting formation of the subcommittees mentioned above. Ok e �1 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. III.H. From: James B. Hovland Mayor ® Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: April 5, 2011 Subject: Appointments to Art Center Board and Heritage Preservation Board ACTION REQUESTED: Endorse Mayor's recommendations for appointment as presented. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: There has been a resignation from the Art Center Board and the recent Code change added a position to the Heritage Preservation Board. The two applicants previously interviewed for these boards indicated their continued interest in appointment therefore; I am recommending the Council appoint Alfred Terry to a term on the Art Center Board for a term ending 2/1/2013 and Terry Ahlstrom to the Heritage Preservation Board for a term ending 2/1/2012. A, 0 less REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. 111.1. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk ® Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: April 5, 2011 Subject: Resolution No. 2011 -41 Accepting Various Donations ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2011 -41 RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -41 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS,'Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Art Center: Marian Alstad 70 Blank DVD Disks with Cases Kathy Angell 4 Kodak Slide Carousels Rick Nelson 6 Pieces of Movie & Photo Equipment Monica Sullivan 12 Artist Textbooks Joanne Okagaki 20 Donated Water Color Books Andy & Michele Herring $500.00 Grant From Herring Family Fund of The Minneapolis Foundation Yvonne Linnemann 12 Canvasses & Miscellaneous Arches Water Color Paper Edina Fire Department: Residential Mortgage Group $700.00 On behalf of: Brian & Sarah Aslesen, Hugh Reichert, Brad Anderson, Mazhar & Iram Saeed, Mark Nelson, Kirk & Jacqueline Granstand, Tim & Susan Bronwing Dated: April 5, 2011 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 5, 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk rw r �yI O�\.r 1�F - 10 REPORURECOMMEN ®ATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item. Item No. III.J From: SHERRY ENGELMAN ® Action COMMUNITY HEALTH ADMIN ❑ Discussion Information Date: APRIL 5, 2011 Subject: AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF BLOOMINGTON AND EDINA FOR PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY RESPONSE (PHER I, II, III) ACTION REQUESTED: Approve the Amendment to The Agreement Between The Cities of Bloomington And Edina For Public Health Emergency Response (PHER I, II, III) for $13,976 to enhance response efforts to Influenza A (H1N1) and other outbreaks of influenza virus. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: In January 2010, Edina entered into an agreement with the City of Bloomington to provide PHER I, II, III services. These services include preparing for and responding to ongoing and emerging outbreaks of Influenza A (H1N1) virus and preparing for additional waves of the recent H1 N1 pandemic or outbreaks of other avian, swine and human influenza virus as directed and provided by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The original agreement cost of $106,181 was offset by PHER I, II, III grant funding of $109,801 which Edina received from Minnesota Department of Health (MDH). MDH is now extending the PHER I, II, III grant to specifically enhance response efforts to Influenza A (H1 N1) and other outbreaks of influenza virus. Edina will receive an additional $22,576. The enhanced response planning and use of these additional funds must be complete by July 30, 2011. Of the $22,576 PHER I, II, III extension grant, $13,976 will cover the cost of the amendment agreement with Bloomington. Specific additional duties include enhanced response planning, ongoing strengthening of the public health workforce, strengthening disease surveillance activities and planning and implementing large scale mass vaccination campaign activities specific to Influenza A (H1 N1) virus and other influenza Ai . w outbreaks. Edina will retain the remaining $8,600 to cover costs of program administration, portable radio communication, and emergency response technology. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the Agreement Amendment. ATTACHMENTS: • Amendment to Agreement Between The Cities of Bloomington And Edina For Public Health Emergency Response (PHER I, Il, III) • Resolution No. 2011 -20 Authorizing The City of Edina To Amend The Public Health Emergency Response Grant Agreement With The Minnesota Department Of Health AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF BLOOMINGTON AND EDINA FOR PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY RESPONSE (PHER I, II & III) THIS AMENDMENT, is made and entered into this day of by and between the City of Bloomington, a Minnesota municipal corporation, in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota ( "Bloomington "), and the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, in the County of Hennepin, State, of Minnesota ( "Edina "). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Bloomington and Edina have previously entered into an Agreement for Public Health and Emergency Response (PHER. 1, II & III) dated, February 22, 2010 (the "Agreement ") WHEREAS; Bloomington warrants and.represents that its Division of Public Health is a duly certified public health agency operating" in accordance with all applicable federal and state requirements; and WHEREAS, Bloomington's Division of Public Health provides public health emergency preparedness services to respond to bioterrorism, infectious diseases, and other threats to public health; and WHEREAS, Edina wishes to promote, support, and maintain the health of its residents by providing public health emergency preparedness, and to contract with Bloomington, through its Division of Public Health, to provide such services to residents of Edina; NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree to the following amendments: A. Term. The term of the Agreement shall be amended to October 1, 2009 through July 30, 2011 provided that either party may terminate the same by sixty (60) days' written notice to the other. In the event of termination pursuant hereto, the payment next due shall be prorated and paid for only the period ended on the date of termination, and Edina shall pay such reduced payment for the period ended on the date of termination, within fifteen (15) days after receipt of Bloomington's invoice. B. Bloomington, through its Division of Public Health, agrees to provide residents of Edina with the following additional PHER Services: 1. Community Engagement — • Review and enhance outreach efforts to longstanding community partners as well as those engaged for the first time during H1 N1 to implement corrective actions, and re -test strategies during seasonal influenza campaigns. • Conduct planning meetings with community partners who required consultation and guidance on community mitigation and social distancing, including schools, faith communities, businesses and community -based organizations. 2. Planning — • Update pandemic influenza plans to reflect more detailed, operational strategies. 1 • Conduct planning activities to address the gaps in vaccine distribution identified in after action reports, prioritize proposed corrective actions, and coordinate with partners to ensure revised vaccine distribution plans are operational. • Address the corrective actions listed in improvement plans, prioritize identified gaps in delivery of countermeasures, solicit new partners, and develop plans to implement corrective actions. 3. Exercises — • Utilized corrective actions and new operational tools developed through improvement process D. Payment. Edina agrees to pay Bloomington an additional $13,976 for the provision of PHER services, during the term of this Agreement, on terms as follows: 1. Bloomington shall bill Edina for PHER services and duties. Payment shall be made within fifteen (15) days of receipt by Edina of Bloomington's invoice. 2. Payments shall be made by Edina according to the following schedule: First half payment of $6,988 due when agreement is executed by both parties Second half payment of $6,988 due June 30, 2011 3. No payment or payments need be made by Edina under this Agreement while Bloomington is in default under any of the terms and conditions hereof. 4. In the event Edina desires to inspect the financial books and records of Bloomington related to the providing of PHER services and duties by Bloomington, Bloomington shall make its financial books records available at the Bloomington City Hall for inspection and copying by Edina, or any agent, employee or representative of Edina, at reasonable business hours. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereto set their hands on the dates written below. CITY OF BLOOMINGTON: Dated: By: Dated: Dated: Its Mayor By: Its City Manager Reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. CITY OF EDINA: By: Its Mayor Dated: By: Its City Manager 2 49S�1r�L o�e� RESOLUTION NO 2011 -20 AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF EDINA TO AMEND THE PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY RESPONSE GRANT ro .. AGREEMENT WITH THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. City of Edina WHEREAS, the STATE, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 144.0742, is empowered to enter into a contractual agreement for the provision of statutorily prescribed public health services; and WHEREAS, the STATE has received funds from the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to assess and enhance the, capacity of the state, tribal and local public health departments to respond to bioterrorism, infectious diseases and other threats to public -health in accordance with the National Incident Management System, National Repose Framework, National Preparedness Goal and any successor plan, and WHEREAS, the purpose of the Public Health Emergency:Response (PHER) grant is to, support and enhance the infrastructure critical.to public- health preparedness and response through ensuring`continuity of public health function; strengthening and sustaining the public health workforce; accommodating surge into healthcare demand; increasing laboratory capacity and capability; strengthening disease surveillance activities; planning and implementing possible large scale mass vaccination activities; developing effective and efficient public and risk communication; developing effective and efficient community mitigation strategies; purchasing and procuring personal protective equipment antivirals and other pandemic related purchases for protecting public health workforce; addressing gaps and other public health preparedness challenges related to public health role in preparing for and responding to ongoing and emerging outbreaks of novel Influenza A (H1N1) virus and prepare for additional waves of the current pandemic or outbreaks of other avian, swine and human influenza virus as directed by the Center for Disease control and Prevention (CDC) and, WHEREAS, the grant agreement is being amended to change the end date of the grant agreement and to provide 'tional federal funding to perform specific public health emergency response functions and duties in accordance with CDC MDH requirements, and WHEREAS, the City of`Edina represents that it is duly qualified and willing to perform the services set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by. the Edina City Council that the Mayor and the City Manager I nter into Public, Emergency mergency Response Grant Agreement with the Minnesota Department of Health to successfully complete administrative and programmatic duties contained within this grant agreement. Passed and adopted this 18th day of January 2011. i. Attest: Debra A. Mangen,'City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing. Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of January 18, 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this - day of 2011. City Clerk City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952- 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 4. c � )BOB \BO • REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item III. K. From: Scott Neal, City Manager ® Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: April 5, 2011 Subject: Resolution No. Three Animals 2011 -40 Findings of Fact — Denial of Request To Keep More Than ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution No. 2011 -40 Findings of Fact — Denial of request to keep more than three animals. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The Council held a public hearing at their March 15, 2011 meeting to consider the request of a citizen to house more than three animals. At that hearing they took action to deny the requested permit and directed the City Attorney to prepare a resolution with findings of fact for adoption. The attached resolution was prepared for consideration and adoption. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2011 -40 RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -40 DENYING PERMIT FOR MORE THAN THREE CATS OR DOGS IN A HOME City of Edina Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Edina City Code § 300.15 provides: Limitation on Number of Dogs or Cats. No more than three dogs or cats in the aggregate which are over six months of age shall be kept or harbored at any place in the City, except in a pet shop, animal hospital, or commercial kennel, unless a permit has been issued pursuant to this Subsection by the Council. Subd. 1. Permit Application and Hearing. Persons who wish to keep or harbor more than the number of dogs or cats permitted by this Subsection may apply for a permit from the Council. After the receipt of the permit application, and the fee as set forth in Section 185 of this Code, the Council shall conduct a public hearing regarding the application. A notice of the date, time, place, and purpose of the hearing shall be mailed at least 10 days before the date of the hearing to each owner of property situated wholly or partly within 200 feet of the property to which the application relates. Subd. 2. Issuance of Permit. After hearing the oral and written views of all interested persons, the Council shall make its decision. The Council shall not grant a permit unless it finds that keeping or harboring more than the allowed number of dogs or cats on the applicant's property: A. Will not be a nuisance. B. Will not be detrimental to the public health and safety of the applicant or other persons in the vicinity. Subd. 3. Permit Not Transferable. No permit may be transferred to any person or place by the person or from the place to whom and for which the permit was granted. The permit shall be granted only for the dogs or cats described in the application. No dogs or cats described in the application may be replaced by the applicant without first obtaining a new permit from the Council. Subd. 4. Conditions and Restrictions. The Council may impose conditions and restrictions as it deems necessary for the protection of the public interest and adjacent properties and to ensure compliance with the requirements of this Section and other applicable provisions of this Code. Each permit issued pursuant to this Subsection shall remain in effect only so long as the conditions and restrictions imposed by the Council are observed and not violated. 1.02 On January 6, 2009 the Edina City Council following a public hearing denied the application of Mr. Carlson, at 523 Coventry Lane, that would have allowed him to maintain three dogs and two cats in his residence. 1.03 Mr. Carlson has now filed a new permit application to have five dogs in his home. He currently has three dogs. City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 Resolution No. 2011 -40 Page 2 1.04 Pursuant to notice, the City Council conducted a public hearing on Mr. Carlson's permit application on December 15, 2011. Section 2. FINDINGS. 2.01 Mr. Carlson's home is in a high density, multifamily townhome complex with limited common area green space. 2.02 Because of the limited green space, the common walls between townhomes and the shared underground parking there is inadequate space for the dogs to exercise, barking has and will annoy other residents, the three dogs he has have been left off leash on the property intimidating residents which would be compounded with two additional dogs, and feces are a problem. 2.03 Mr. Carlson testified that he needs the dogs for health reasons because they provide him exercise, but there are other means for Mr. Carlson's to exercise. 2.04 The additional dogs will create a nuisance and will be detrimental to the public health and safety of other persons in the vicinity. Section 3. DENIAL. NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved that the City Council of the City of Edina, denies the permit request of Wayne Carlson & Rosie Homer of 523 Coventry Lane, per Edina Code Section 300.15 to exceed the limitation on the number of dogs and cats allowed in a home. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on ,2011. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 5, 2011, anal as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2011. City Clerk ff Oi VI • r ,syo • REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. III.L. From: John Wallin Finance Director ® Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: April 5, 2011 Subject: Set Public Hearing Date 5 -3 -2011 Delinquent Utilities ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution 2011 -44. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Last October during the public hearing for certification of delinquent utilities, the City Council requested that large delinquencies be certified more often than once a year. The council also stated an interest in whether the property owners names should be included on the published list. The attached resolution lists three properties that are now more than $2,000 delinquent. Hennepin County has said that certification does not become a lien for tax purposes until the certification is added to the taxes at the end of the year. The amount would be listed with the County as a pending certification until it is included with the 2012 taxes. The City's attorney has responded with the following: At the time the City provides water service to a property the City has an enforceable lien on the property for the cost of the water provided. Minnesota Statutes §514.67 provides: "All charges ... of any nature now or hereafter authorized or required by law.... shall constitute and be a first and prior lien from the date of such... service upon all property in this state subject to taxation as the property of the person from whom such charges and expenses are by law authorized or required to be collected. No record of such lien shall be deemed necessary." The statute's validity as applied to unpaid utility charges has been upheld. In Re Sheldahl, Inc. 298 B.R. 874 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2003). Minn. Stat. § 444.075, Subd. 3r provides: "The governing body may make the charge a charge against the owner, lessee, occupant, or all of them and may provide and covenant for certifying unpaid charges to the county auditor with taxes against the property served for collection as other taxes are collected." ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2011 -44 RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -44 CALLING A PUBLIC HEARING FOR CONSIDERATION OF CERTAIN DELINQUENT UTILITIES DU -11 MAY 3, 2011 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, that a public hearing shall be held on the 3rd day of May, 2011, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at 7:00 p.m. to pass upon such proposed certifications, and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such delinquent utility certifications will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to the following certifications against 2012 taxes: Bac Home Loan Servicing 5808 Amy Dr. $2,200.18 Mohammede Sabri 6813 Creston Rd $2,872.44 Waldorf- Nevens Cleaners 7075 Amundson Ave. $117,364.52 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, that the City Clerk is directed to publish and mail notices of the aforementioned public hearings. Attest: ADOPTED this 5th day of April 2011. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 5, 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 City Clerk A owe v� � 11886 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. III.M. From: John Wallin Finance Director ® Action F-1 Discussion El Information Date: April 5, 2011 Subject: Water Shutoff Authorization ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize water shutoff at 2906 66th St. W. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: At the January 5, 2010 City Council meeting, the Council approved Ordinance 2009 -15 which changed the way the City proceeds with shutting off water services and now requires Council authorization prior to shutoff. I would like to submit the account at 2906 66t Street West to Council to authorize staff to shut off the water services for non- payment. The account is located in Richfield which cannot be certified in Edina, and no payment has been received since September 2010 (this 'account only has water service from the City of Edina so the balance accumulates more slowly). The past due balance owing is $142.31. If the Council authorizes water shutoff, city staff will send a notice to the customer notifying them that water service will be shut off at a date listed on the notice, typically 10 days following the date of the letter. ofte •lam v • \cO,eRpe°e REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # III. N. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE City Engineer ® Action Discussion Information Date: April 5, 2011 Subject: Resolution No. 2011 -42 Approving Cooperative Agreement Between the City of Minneapolis and the City of Edina Regarding Bicycle Parking Project. Recommendation: Authorize Mayor to sign resolution, and Mayor, City Manager, and City Attorney to sign attached agreement. Info /Background: The Transit for Livable Communities (TLC) created a bike parking program through Bike Walk Twin Cities, which is the Minneapolis area program of the federal Non - motorized Transportation Pilot. TLC has worked with the City of Minneapolis, Minnesota Department of Transportation, and Federal Highways Administration to streamline the federal funding process. The City of Minneapolis has agreed to be the processing house for the $75,000 of funds allocated towards this program. The City of Edina is eligible for $5,800. The funds for this program are very specific to purchasing bike racks for the community. Brad Schaeppi with the Bike Edina Task Force is coordinating the application process such as the submittal information and the amount of bike racks that will be requested. The final application will need to be submitted by the City due to future requirements such as a five year commitment to maintaining the bike racks, etc. Staff believes this program will compliment last year's Statewide Health Improvement Program, which the Park & Recreation Department acquired 13 bike racks for installation. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution • Cover letter from TLC • Materials from Bike Parking Program Workshop • Cooperative Agreement Between the City of Minneapolis and City of Edina Regarding Bicycle Parking Project G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets\Sidewalks n Bikeways\Item III.N. Resolution No. 2011-42 Approving Cooperative Agreement Between the City of Minneapolis and the City of Edina Regarding Bicycle Parking Project RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -42 APPROVING COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS AND THE CITY OF EDINA REGARDING BICYCLE PARKING PROJECT Cit of Edina WHEREAS, the Transit for Livable Communities (TLC) created a bike Parking program through Bike Walk Twin Cities, which is the Minneapolis area program of the federal Non - motorized Transportation Pilot; and WHEREAS, the Federal Highway Administration has awarded the City of Minneapolis $75,000 to be distributed among fifteen communities for the purpose of purchasing and delivering bike racks to the communities; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina is eligible for $5,800 of the funds to be used for bicycle racks within the community; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council approves the Cooperative Agreement between the City of Minneapolis and City of Edina Regarding Bicycle Parking Project. ADOPTED this 5th day of April, 2011. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 5, 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 City Clerk G:I ENGINE- 1\ INFRAS- 1% StreetslSIDEWA- 11TRANSI- I \BIKEPA- 1%Resolution No. 201142 Approving Cooperative Agreement between the City of Minneapolis and the City of Edina Regarding Bicycle Parking Project.docx City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 A 1Cti1'l Ol 1 Bike W_ alk f _ Twin Cities Mayor Hovland Wayne Houle 4801 W 50th St Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Dear Mayor Hovland and Wayne Houle, Transit for Livable Communities 626 Selby Ave St. Paul, MN 55104 651.767.0298 www.ticminnesota.org .www.bikewalktc.org IA March 18, 2011 I am pleased to announce the Bike Walk Twin Cities Bike Parking Program. The Transit for Livable Communities Board has awarded Bike Walk Twin Cities funds for bicycle parking throughout our grant area. From your experience you may understand federal funds to be very inefficient for small projects such as this. Working with FHWA and MnDOT, we have identified a streamlined process.to make this a feasible undertaking. The Bike Parking program allotment for Edina is $5800.00. This letter is.a call for community enrollment in the Bike Walk Twin Cities Bike Parking Program. By responding to this letter and including ,a completed Community Agreement with the City of Minneapolis before April 29, 2010 ('enclosed, City of Minneapolis council action to execute agreement will occur April 2, 2011) you confirm your community wishes to participate in the BWTC Bike Parking Program for 2011 and will prepare application for the specified program allotment for bike parking. Confirmation letter with signed community agreement can be sent by mail or electronically to: Jamez Smith BWTC Bike Parking Enrollment Transit for Livable Communities 626 Selby Ave Saint Paul, MN 55104 jamers @ticminnesota.ore Estimating cost of $100 /rack, you can see that this program will allow you to augment your community's bicycle parking significantly. To participate, we will need confirmation of your community's participation by April 29, 2011 (see attached), this includes entering into a community agreement with the City of Minneapolis, who as the Fiscal Agent for Bike. Walk Twin Cities will contract for purchase of these racks. With a vendor selection anticipated in early April, the timeline will enable your community to receive delivery and install racks this season. Attached is a description of the process. BWTC hosted a workshop on February 25 to explain the program; Brad Schaeppi from Bike Edina Task force was in attendance from your community. If you have questions about the process or would like to discuss the benefits of the program, please contact Tony Hull at tonvh @ticminnesota.org or 651 -789- 1404. Tony has worked diligently with state and federal partners #o create a process that make this program possible. I hope you are able to participate in this opportunity. Our latest.data collection shows an 'increase of bicycling of 33% in the Minneapolis -Saint Paul area. Bicycle parking will serve your current bicyclists and stimulate more riders. We would be pleased to work with Edina to make this asset a reality in your community. % .- Regard's; Joan•Pasiuk `Director, Bike'Walk Twin Cities Materials from Bike Walk Twin Cities February 25th Bike Parking Program Workshop March 15, 2011 Transit for Livable Communities 626 Selby Ave St. Paul, MN 55104 651.767.0298 www.ticrninnesota.ore www.bikewalktc.org As a result of board action in Spring 2010, Transit for Livable Communities announces -a bike parking program through Bike Walk Twin Cities, the Minneapolis -area program of the federal Nonmotorized Transportation Pilot (NTP). Basis of the Bike Parking Program TLC has worked with the City of Minneapolis, MnDOT and the FHWA to develop a streamlined federal funding process with much of the administrative work being completed by TLC in advance of program enrollment. Participating communities will need to enroll in the program by subscription including entering into a community agreement with the city of Minneapolis who has been named the award recipient for the program and will be contracting directly with the approved vendor for purchase and delivery of bike parking to each community. . Additionally, the agreement will specify the agency's responsibility for meeting program guidelines including all relevant state and federal requirements for use of federal aid highway funds. Funds Available A formula to determine the minimum amount of eligible funding for each community been determined based upon an equal distribution of two and two - thirds percent of available funds, plus a remaining allocation based on proportion of community population (ACS 2009) The total award for this program is $75,000. ,Actual amount of bike parking that will available to each, community will be assigned after vendor selection. The following amounts will be made available to communities who choose to enroll in the program: Brooklyn Center $4,300.00 Columbia Heights $3,500.00 Edina $5,800.00 Falcon Heights $2,500.00 Fridley $4,200.00 Golden Valley $3,700.00 Lauderdale $2,200.00 Richfield $4,800.00 Robbinsdale $3,100.00 Roseville $4,800.00 St. Anthony $2,700.00 St. Louis Park $5,800.00 St. Paul $25,600.00 Minneapolis" $2,000.00 Fort Snelling /MSP Airport $2,000.00 "Minneapolis will only participate in requests of bike racks that are not allocated during application process Eligible Costs This program covers 100% cost of purchase and delivery of bike parking through a contract between Minneapolis and the vendor (to be announced). Communities receiving parking through this program will not incur expenses or reimbursements for these costs. Costs not covered not covered bvProgram Any costs including planning, application preparation, site preparation, installation, maintenance or additional amenities beyond the approved parking units and hardware identified when a bid is accepted by the city of Minneapolis. Program Enrollment Requirements Each Community wishing to apply for their portion of the bike parking program funds will need to formally commit to meeting the program guidelines, including entering into a cooperative community agreement with the city of Minneapolis by no later than April 29, 2011. In addition, each community will be responsible for submitting a program application that includes the following • Detailed plan set of proposed bike parking installation locations (based on template provided by-TLC), including electronic shapefiles (GIS) and spreadsheet • Certificate of Right -of -way ownership (forms available on website) for each location • Certificate of Utility relocations for each location • Additional project documentation including categorical exclusions (prepared and available by TLC) (all forms and referenced documentation available at www.bikewalktwincities.org.) Additionally each community will be responsible to install bike parking at approved locations within 30 days of delivery of units, and provide ongoing maintenance in accordance with federal funding guidlines.. Communities are.expected to follow the guidance included in the Association of Bicycle and Pedestrian Professionals (APBP) updated Bicycle Parking Guidelines (available for fee license download at www.apbp.org) for both identification of appropriate locations and installation. Participants are encouraged to submit applications before May 31 in order to allow time for adequate review and approval of application in time to install parking during the 2011 construction season. Process • Notify TLC of.intention to participate and complete Community Agreement by April 29, 2010 • Engage stakeholders and prepare application and site plan • Submit completed application package to MnDOT office of State Aid (applicants are encouraged to submit applicants before June 1" to allow time for installations to occur this calendar year). • Upon approval communities will be notified that they may contact the vendor and arrange for delivery of approved parking units • Communities must arrange installations within 30 days of delivery (any site preparation should be completed before contacting vendor) • Communities must submit photo documentation of all installations to TLC within 60 days of delivery of bike racks from vendor. • All documentation for installations in 2011 must be received no later than November 15, 2011. Confirmation letter with signed community agreement, must be received by C.O.B. April 29, 2011 and can be sent by mail or submitted electronically to: Jamez Smith BWTC Bike Parking Enrollment Transit for Livable Communities 626 Selby Ave Saint Paul, MN 55104 jamers @ticminnesota.org SAMPLE Bike Parking request form; locations, jurisdiction and rack types are for EXAMPLE ONLY COVER PAGE Bike Walk Twin Cities Bike Parking Program Request for Review NTP Jurisdiction: St Paul, MN Project ID: SP 141 - 091 -28 —SAINT PAUL Applicant Agency: City of St Paul Department of Public Works Project Manager: John Doe, Engineer Email iohn.doe @ci.stpoul.sample Mailing Address: 123 Public Works Plaza, St Paul, MN 55101 Phone: 651 -555 -9876 role <l1i 11c�lrrsi s, I - AR _ L T CA-;)� \ nGjU(jee'I� D - - =qi ttachmen i� .1s f for ov - ae: 3, 4 -- _ -- - 14 I� l r_I ,tI oil, City of St Paul Requested Bike Parking Locations with labeled IN • � rb4 -3AMB C it 2 519 Selby Avenue 3 602 University Ave -. 7 _._. .237 University Ave 5 etc.... 6 etc.... oil, City of St Paul Requested Bike Parking Locations with labeled IN • � eta• 1 6131619 Selby Ave 2 519 Selby Avenue 3 602 University Ave 4 .237 University Ave 5 etc.... B etc.... 7 etc.... a etc.... 9 etc.... 10 etc.... 11 etc.... 12 etc.... 13 etc.... 14 etc.... 15 etc.... 16 etc.... Legend 0 BIKE PARKING LOCATION PARKING - LOCATION LIST TO BE INCLUDED WITH AN EXCEL SPREADSHEET LISTING OF LOCATIONS AND REQUESTED BIKE PARKING AMOUNT WITH LOCATION ID (TLC BWTC WILL PROVIDE SPREADSHEET TEMPLATE) Transit for Livable Communities SAMPLE Bike Parking Request Form Page 1 SAMPLE Bike Parking request form; locations, jurisdiction and rack types are for EXAMPLE ONLY Bike Walk Twin Cities Bike Parking Program Requistion Site Location ID: St Paul #1 LOCATION INFORMATION AND INSTALLTION PLAN (USE I PAGE Street Address: 6131619 Selby Avenue (Paisano's and Louisiana Cafe) FOR EACH LOCATION Building Date: 1982 REQUESTED) Is property listed on the National Register of Historic Places or in a National Register Historic District? Yes X No ; Hill Historic District Listings of Historic Places and Districts can be obtained fi•om the State Historic Preservation Office www.mnhs.org /shpo/ Rack Type: Style B Quantity: 6 Color: Black Placement Description: Racks will be installed in the highlighted areas (3 each) along the 8' boulevard on the north side of Selby Avenue. The city will include a concrete pad for secure installation, and racks will be parallel to the street and 3' from curb facing outside of the pedestrian accessible route and parking doorzone. NOTE: Applicants will be responsible to ensure installation conforms to ADA and APBP guidance for rack placement. Application should include description of any additional installation hardware such as anchors or mounting sleeves, if other than that provided or recommended by the approved vendor. Transit for Livable Communities SAMPLE Bike Parking Request Form Page 2 SAMPLE Bike Parking request form; locations, jurisdiction and rack types are for EXAMPLE ONLY ADDITIONAL PAGES FOR EACH LOCATION... Bike Walk Twin Cities Bike Parking Program Requistion Site Location ID: St Paul #2 Street Address: 519 Selby Avenue (Metro Transit bus stop) Building Date: 1911 Is property listed on the National Register of Historic Places or in a National Register Historic District? Yes X No ; Hill Historic District Rack Type: Style B Quantity: 3 Placement Description: Racks (3) will be installed in the highlighted area along the 8' boulevard on the north side of Selby Avenue. The city will include a concrete pad for secure installation, and racks will be at 45 degree angle to the street and 3' from curb facing outside of the pedestrian accessible route and parking door zone. Racks will be 10' east of the accessible bus stop landing. Transit for Livable Communities SAMPLE Bike Parking Request Form Page 3 SAMPLE Bike Parking request form; locations, jurisdiction and rack types are for EXAMPLE ONLY Appendix — Approved NTP Bike Walk Twin Cities Bike Parking Program — Eligible Rack Specifications Style A — Inverted U rack 35' . 6,i 32" Area =16.7 square feet 75" APPROVED BWTC BIKE PARKING PROGRAM SPECS WILL BE PROVIDED BY TLC Transit for Livable Communities SAMPLE Bike Parking Request Form Page 4 SAMPLE Bike Parking request form; locations, jurisdiction and rack types are for EXAMPLE ONLY Style B — Post rack 16.5" 35" 1.5" 2.375" .. 3z„ --1 7S" Transit for Livable Communities SAMPLE Bike Parking Request Form Page 5 SAMPLE Bike Parking request form; locations, jurisdiction and rack types are for EXAMPLE ONLY Style C — Swerve rack 34" 2 X12 32" Area = 16.7 square feet 75" Transit for Livable Communities SAMPLE Bike Parking Request Form Page 6 BWTC Bike Parkine Proeram Process. Overview February 2011 Responsibility Activity MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCf TLC TLC submits final number of racks to be Included In the bid advertisement APP/MPLS MPIS city council approval of community agreement; applicant community 'MMPLS''AApr 1; App q M byApril.' authorization to enter Into agreement 130 . ' Public Process to Identify suitable locations for community bike parking (should APP engage relevant stakeholders (neighborhood groups, Transportation Advisory Committees schools etc.)- - ild Adveittsement /ConwR.Awaid:(determl -' number of MPLvnc City of Minneapolis awards bike parking contract to low bidder racks fcr each communMl,. Application Development and submission using site plan template provided by APP TLC; Including additional documentation for MnI-PM Including ROW 2A or MWAY 011 -Teneasment for blic access on rivate ro . TLC%MnDOTCRU Review of application; negotiate any needed changes with applicant Review', s allow fora or CRU to': aw.and suggest enges _ TLC Upon application approval- TLC notifiation to vendor, MPiS and applicant of shippingsAouldallowfor ddNery by OCi'1, 2011. ' approval and Applicant contacts vendor to arrange shipping - - _ Provide for any she preparation needed for bike rack Installation (demo; concrete • Any site 6,6eparatlan`• she0 :be'completed.biicim7delt6ry;6 f nxb (conslderd;pait APP pad, eta) - .'ofinstallaUOn ;'andgirespon dbII6'df'a0pIjj.,4_ APP After receiving bike racks from vendor, applicant has 30 days to Install bike racks N Delhn'rymust xwr tiefore OCf'1,'201'1;'Installatlonby OR 31`, accordance with approved plans APP Applicant provides photographic documentation of Installation to TLC/MPLS - - `Dowrrrc,Mation by NOW15; 2011 within 60 days of delivery of bike racks - APP APP11cont Community MnDOT MnDOT Cultural Resources Ofte oJMetro State Aid MPLS City of Mlnneopolls Department of PublIc Worts TLC TLC Bike Walk Twin Cities Proposed Allocation of Bike Walk Twin Cities Bike Parking Program Allocations for2011 Allocation based on each community receiving $2, 000 plus additional amount based on population Project Budget Possible allocation based on'rack pricing scenarios' Totals 77000 $77,000.00 770 616 513 Location BWTC Allocation Qty $100 racks Qty $125 racks Qty $150 racks Brooklyn Center $4,300.00 43 34 29 Columbia Heights $3,500.00 .35 Z8 • 23 Edina $5,800.00 58 46 39 Falcon Heights $2,500.00 2 Fridley $4,200.00 "k' 42"` r . @ �4" �'' ' m "ft ° 28 Golden Valley $3,700.00 .37 -"3p c , 25 Lauderdale A $2,200.00 .22 Fit-, I 8j , � � 15 Richfield $4,800.00 48 38 - 32 Robbinsdale $3,100.00- r,31 I A lid 1125I" Il IC Roseville $4,800.00 ° 789 K 3'2 St. Anthony $2,700.00 St. Louis Park $5,800.00 8e �' j 39 St. Paul $25,600.00 256 205 171•' Minneapolis" $2,000.00 20 16 13 Fort Snelling/MSP Airport !A _ $2,000.00 20 16 13 Actual costs wm De Tor purchase and delivery of rack and mounting hardware, and not be known until contract is awarded 'Minneapolis will only participate in requests of bike racks that are not allocated during application process r US.RpvCrcntofT,vuportatlOn �� FaCOrsl MpMay AEmlNStntlon Twin Cities c 3RD DRAFT —FEB 15, 2011 COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF NNNEAPOLIS AND CITY /COUNTY OF REGARDING BICYCLE PARKING PROJECT THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into as of this day of , 2010 by and between the CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "Minneapolis "), and the CITY /COUNTY OF , a Minnesota municipal/county corporation ( "City /County "), collectively referred to as the "Cities OR City and County." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the CITY /COUNTY OF desires to locate and construct new bicycle parking facilities, State Project 141- 091 -028 ( "Project ") within its boundaries and has been determined to be eligible for Federal Non - Motorized Transportation Pilot Project funds (hereby known as the "NTP "); and WHEREAS, the CITY /COUNTY OF recognizes and is relying on the CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS to act as the financial agent for the receipt of NTP federal grant funds for this Project to streamline the reporting requirements on behalf of the CITY/COUNTY OF WHEREAS, the CITY /COUNTY OF is aware of and understands the Project Memorandum dated August 16, 2010 that was created for this Project and shall follow its provisions; WHEREAS, the CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS has agreed to act as the financial agent to receive approximately $75,000 in NTP federal grant funds (MnDOT Agreement No. 97553) to procure and furnish bike parking facilities on behalf of cities and counties that are eligible to receive NTP grant funds; and WHEREAS, the CITY /COUNTY OF understands that the federal grant funds will be used to the procure and furnish the bicycle parking facilities but will not be used for the installation, operation or maintenance of said facilities; WHEREAS, the CITY /COUNTY OF shall install and assume ownership, operation and maintenance of the bike parking facilities at its own cost according to the federal NTP grant provisions and this Agreement; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and mutual obligations of the Cities OR City and County contained herein, each of them does'hereby represent, covenant and agree with the other as follows. Minneapolis Obligations. Minneapolis through its Director of Public Works or his/her designee shall cant' out its fiscal agent and Agreement responsibilities for the Project in all participating cities and counties. Minneapolis will expect Transit for Livable Communities (TLC) and each participating City/County to perform their due diligence and responsibilities to complete the Project. Minneapolis will advertise a bid to contract with a vendor to f u-nish . (purchase and delivery) of specified bicycle parking facilities to each participating City /County. Minneapolis will be responsible for maintaining financial records consistent with federal grant requirements to keep track of all federal expenses related to these funds. Minneapolis shall reimburse the approved vendor in a timely manner for any and all eligible federal costs, and submit documentation. for reimbursement to MnDOT when project documentation is completed. 2. City/County Eligibility. Each City/County agrees to perform the following at their own cost prior to becoming eligible: a. ' Submission of candidate locations for possible placement of bike parking facilities to TLC. b. Provide the proper Certificate of Stand Alone Right of Way for installation locations, or obtain necessary easements to use private property to locate and grant public access to the respective bike parking facilities. c. Provide any environmental information on all proposed locations for a possible bike parking facility required by the Cultural Resources Unit of the Minnesota Department of Transportation to assure compliance with all applicable State and Federal environmental requirements. d. Agree to provide suitable locations and install the bike parking facilities including the construction of a foundation where necessary. e. Agree to operate and maintain the bike parking facility for its useful life which for purposes of this Agreement is a minimum of five (5) years. The end date shall be December 31 following the fifth year anniversary of the installation. Given a 2011 installation, the end date of the useful life shall be December 31, 2016; a 2012 installation and end date of December 31, 2017; etc. Said operation and maintenance includes, but is not limited to, repair or replacement of the bicycle parking facilities due to graffiti or damage by others. 3. City/County Obligations. Subject to the provisions of this Agreement and in conformance with the NTP federal grant and appropriate provisions of MnDOT Agreement 97553, each participating City/County after approval of eligibility agrees to perform the following activities at their own cost: a. Submit a site plan for each site(s) providing detailed information identified by the NTP Bike Parking Request template provided by TLC. b. Obtain written approval of the bike parking facilities site plan(s) by TLC and MnDOT Office of Cultural Resources and State Aid prior to Minneapolis furnishing said facilities. c. Request bike parking facilities to be furnished through the bid process administered by Minneapolis. The costs to furnish the bike parking facilities will be funded by a Federal grant awarded to Minneapolis. Minneapolis will famish the bike parking facilities to each City/County upon the following conditions: i.' Use its own local resources (staff and funds) to identify, prepare and install one or more sites for the placement of bike parking facilities within its boundaries. Said local resources are not reimbursable by the federal NTP grant funds. ii. Install all bike parking facilities no later than 30 days from receipt of bike parking facilities delivered from the vendor. iii. Provide to TLC and Minneapolis proper documentation of the installation of bike parking facilities in accordance with the approved site plan(s). Each City/County will submit to TLC proper written and photo documentation after the bike parking facility has been purchased, delivered and installed. The installation and its financial documentation must be retained at the each participating City/County for a sufficient length of time to allow for proper audit and close out of the Project. 4. Removal of Bike Parking Facilities by City/County. If a City/County elects to move or remove a bike parking facility prior to the end of its useful life, the following procedures shall be followed. A City/County may elect to move or remove the bike parking facility by declaring a greater public purpose or reasons related to protecting the public health, safety and welfare. Said removal will not be granted based on lack of proper operation and maintenance duties required by each City/County. If said move or removal is for temporary purposes related to adjacent construction or development purposes defined as less than one year and will be reinstalled at the same location then no further action is needed. If said move or removal will be greater than one year than thirty (30) days prior to its removal, the City/County must notify Minneapolis (OR TLC, ATTN: Tony Hull)of its intent to remove the bike parking facility. If the said bike parking facility will. be moved to another location, then a relocation request and site plan shall be submitted to Minneapolis. Minneapolis will coordinate with TLC, if the NTP program still exists. Minneapolis shall either approve a new location within the City/County for the bike parking facility or request that the bike parking facility be returned to Minneapolis for installation elsewhere in the Twin Cities eligible NTP area. Minneapolis will respond to the removal notification within the thirty (30) day notification period and notify the participating City /County in writing of its decision. Each City/County will be responsible for the removal and delivery cost of the bike parking facility to Minneapolis, but will not be responsible for repayment of any NTP federal grant due to the removal of the bike parking facility. The above removal provisions will no longer be in effect after the five (5) minimum useful life as described in Section 2e. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have set their hands as of the day and year first above written. 0 CITY /COUNTY OF By. Its Mayor By: Its City Manager Reviewed and approved City Att orney For the City of Minneapolis Approved: By: Public Works Department Approved as to Form BY: Assistant City Attorney Countersigned: Finance Officer or Designee r :4 •lvv • REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # III. O. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE City Engineer ® Action F-1 Discussion Information Date: April 5, 2011 Subject: Resolution No. 2011 -45 Approving Utility Easement along Olinger Boulevard Recommendation: Authorize Mayor to sign resolution and Mayor and City Manager to sign attached utility easements. Info /Background: Excel Energy is upgrading their Feeder Lines within the City of Edina to help increase the electrical reliability within parts of the City. The route that Excel has chosen does not fit within the existing right -of -way due the amount of other public and private utilities that currently exist. Excel Energy is proposing a 10 -foot utility easement be granted to allow them to place the Feeder Line along the west and south side of Olinger Boulevard. Excel Energy has stated that the Feeder Line will be placed underground utilizing a trenchless technology, therefore not disturbing any trees within this easement. This easement is located along the easterly side of Bredesen Park and along the northerly side of Countryside Park. Staff has requested that Excel Energy not charge the City to relocate power poles along the France Avenue sidewalk project, which they have agreed to. Staff is not recommending that Excel Energy be charged anything for this easement for the following reasons: it is a non - exclusive easement, it serves residents and businesses within the City of Edina, and Excel Energy has agreed to the relocation of the power poles on the France Avenue sidewalk project. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution • Utility Easements g: \engineering \contract numbers \2010 \eng 10-3w. 70th st - th 100 to france ove \admin \legal \Item Iii. f. construction engineering services west 70th street.docx RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -45 APPROVING UTILITY EASEMENT FOR EXCEL ENERGY ALONG OLINGER BOULEVARD City of Edina WHEREAS, Northern States Power, d /b /a Xcel Energy provides electricity to the City of Edina; and WHEREAS, Xcel Energy is upgrading their existing trunk lines that helps provide reliable service to the City of Edina; and WHEREAS, Xcel Energy has requested a non - exclusive 10 -foot wide utility easement adjacent to the westerly and southerly right -of -way of Olinger Boulevard from Vernon Avenue to Tracy Avenue; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council approves the request for a non - exclusive 10 -foot utility easement along Olinger Boulevard. ADOPTED this 5th day of April, 2011. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 5, 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this I day of , 20 City Clerk G:\Engineering \General \O Streets \Olinger Boulevard City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 -826 -0379 UTILITY EASEMENT KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, That the undersigned, hereinafter called "Grantor ", in consideration of the sum of $1.00 and other good and valuable consideration in hand paid by NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY, a Minnesota Corporation, d/b /a Xcel Energy, the receipt and sufficiency whereof is hereby acknowledged, do hereby, grant unto said Company its successors and assigns, hereinafter called "Grantee ", an easement with the right, privilege and authority to excavate for, construct, install, mark, inspect, operate, repair, alter, replace, reconstruct, remove and maintain its facilities for the transmission and distribution of electrical energy, including the necessary electric cables, conduits, vaults, pedestals, manholes and facilities related and appurtenant thereto, over, across, under and upon said easement on the following described land situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, (hereinafter called "Premises ") to -wit: Outlots 1 and 2, Edina Grove (Torrens Certificate of Title No. 426147) Except for the right of access, tree trimming and temporary working area, said easement shall be limited to that part of the Premises (hereinafter called "Easement Area ") described as follows: AND The Easterly 10 feet as measured perpendicular to the east lines of the above described Premises. (As shown on attached Exhibit A). That part of Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1126, Files of the Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin lying Southerly and Westerly of the following described line: Beginning at the most Southerly corner of said Tract B; thence Northwesterly at an angle of 12 degrees 00 minutes as turned Northerly from the South line of said Tract B, a distance of 665 feet to a point of curve to the right with a radius of 295 feet and a delta angle of 77 degrees 30 minutes; thence Northwesterly and Northerly along said curve a distance of 399.03 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left, said curve to the left having a radius of 145 feet; thence Northerly along said curve to the left to the south line of County Road No. 158 (Vernon Avenue) and there terminating. (Torrens Certificate No. 448083) Except for the right of access, tree trimming and temporary working area, said easement shall be limited to that part of the Premises (hereinafter called "Easement Area ") described as follows: Pagel of 3 A 10 foot wide easement lying between a line drawn parallel and 70 feet southwesterly of the northeasterly line of the above described Premises and a line drawn parallel and 60 feet southwesterly of the northeasterly line of the above described Premises. The side lines of said easement are intended to be prolonged or shortened to terminate on the southerly right of way line of Vernon Avenue and the south line of R.L.S. No. 1126. (As shown on attached Exhibit B). The grant of easement herein contained shall also include the right of reasonable access to said easement across said lands for the purpose of exercising the rights granted herein, together with the right to remove from said Easement Area any structure, trees, shrubbery, or other object or obstruction which in Grantee's opinion interferes with said facilities or the removal of which may be reasonably necessary for the construction or maintenance thereof. Except as otherwise provided herein in any Underground Distribution Agreement between the Grantor and Grantee covering the above described premises, Grantee shall, after installation of the above described electrical facilities, or after the exercise of any rights granted herein, restore the lands subject to this easement to as near their original condition as is reasonably possible and remove therefrom all debris, spoils, and equipment resulting from or used in connection with said installation. Grantor further agrees that no structure or obstruction will be erected or permitted or any trees planted on or within said easement, that Grantor will not change the ground elevation thereof without the written consent of Grantee, or perform any act which will interfere with or endanger said electrical facilities. Grantor covenants with Grantee, its successors and assigned, that Grantor has the right to sell . and convey an easement in the manner and form aforesaid. Grantee, at the request of the Grantor, shall relocate, remove, replace or reconnect at its own expense its facilities where such relocation, removal, replacement or reconnection is necessitated by any other project authorized by the Grantor in the Easement Area, regardless of whether the project is temporary or permanent. This instrument and the covenant's and agreements contained herein are binding upon the Grantor, his personal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns. It is mutually understood and agreed that this instrument covers all the agreements and stipulations between the parties and that no representation or statements, verbal or written, have been made modifying, adding to or changing the terms hereof. This instrument is exempt from the Minnesota Deed Tax. SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS Page 2 of 3 GAEngineering \General \O Streets \Olinger Boulevard \Utility Easements\2011 031 City of Edina Torrens (3).doc 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this instrument to be duly executed as of the day of 12011. By: Its: By: Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2011, by and Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public This instrument was drafted by: BJA Northern States Power Company 414 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, MN 55401 Torrens 2011.031 day of , the respectfully, of the City of Page 3 of 3 GAEngineering \General \O Streets \Olinger Boulevard \Utility Easements\2011 031 City of Edina Torrens (3).doc NORTHERN STATES POWER MINNESOTA EXHIBIT A Certificate of Survey Location: City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota Grantor: City of Edina I I i 1 /11 ITt (\T q t vvlL.v1 1 cc w z m 1 W. 61ST STREET r -nin I A /� ^)/11 ir- 1_vllvrn �7R10vL- nl ITI V V I L.V 1 tom.. DIST: EDINA SEC. 32, T.1 17M., R.21 W., 5TH P.M. CO.: HENNEPIN N Scale- 1"=120' 10 i so '� �• o / 60 wul l IVI V / 11 A 1 � 1 1 60 1 0 JEFF PLACE i I a I I I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE I��T ESTATE OF MINNESOTA. . PETER D. GITZEW LIC. NO. 44901 DATE__ & m i i Certificate of Survey Location: City of Edina, Grantor: City of Edina 91 z 0 U w 0 O z I w ' � I I I I NORTHERN STATES POWER N MINNESOTA EXHIBIT B Hennepin County, Minnesota Scale: 1"=150' \ NORTH LINE OF SW% SECTION 32 I 1 600 _ Y \\ NE'LY LINF�OF °PRmifts° e o SOUTH LINE OF R.L.S.NO.1126 /r j 0 )A )T (1r"• A11A /� / A /fir ^1671 / A /,R1 l!1 Ivvv 1 i •r Jvv i -r SIC."v , -,ri VV 32 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THEOF TH STATE OF MINNESOTA. DIST: EDINA PETER D. GITZE LIC. NO. 44901 SEC. 32 T117N., R.21W., 5TH P.M. CO.: HEWEPIN DATE UTILITY EASEMENT KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS, That the undersigned, hereinafter called "Grantor ", in consideration of the sum of $1.00 and other good and valuable consideration in hand paid by NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY, a Minnesota Corporation, d/b /a Xcel Energy, the receipt and sufficiency whereof is hereby acknowledged, do hereby, grant unto said Company its successors and assigns, hereinafter called "Grantee ", a non - exclusive easement with the right, privilege and authority to excavate for, construct, install, mark, inspect, operate, repair, alter, replace, reconstruct, remove and maintain its underground facilities for the transmission and distribution of electrical energy, including the necessary underground electric cables, conduits, vaults, pedestals, manholes and facilities related and appurtenant thereto, under and upon said easement on the following described land situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, (hereinafter called "Premises ") to -wit: That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 32, Township 117, Range 21 described as follows: Commencing at a point in the West line of said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter which is 510 feet South of the Northwest corner thereof; thence South along the West line thereof to the Southwest corner thereof, thence East 80 rods to the Southeast corner thereof; thence North along the East boundary line thereof to a point 849 feet South of the North line thereof; thence Northwesterly along a straight line to the point of commencement. Except for the right of access tree trimming and temporary working area, said easement shall be limited to that part of the Premises (hereinafter called "Easement Area ") described as follows: A 10 foot wide easement which lies within 10 feet to the left of the following described sideline: Commencing at the northwest corner of the above described Premises thence on an assumed bearing of South 76 degrees 06 minutes 17 seconds East a distance of 565.42 feet along the north line of said Premises to the point of beginning of the sideline to be described; thence South 64 degrees 06 minutes 17 seconds East a distance of 264.32 feet; thence southeasterly 299.13 feet along a 1268.77 foot radius tangential curve concave to the southwest having a central angle of 13 degrees 30 minutes 30 seconds; thence South 50 degrees 35 minutes 47 seconds East a distance of 24.28 feet; thence southeasterly 212.19 feet along a 592.32 foot radius tangential curve concave to the northeast having a central angle of 20 degrees 31 minutes 30 seconds; thence South 71 degrees 07 minutes 17 seconds East a distance of 103.05 feet and there said sideline terminates. (As shown on attached Exhibit A). Page 1 of 5 AND That part of the South 14 rods of Government Lot 1, Section 32, Township 117 North, Range 21, West of the 5th Principal Meridian, lying South and West of the following described line: Beginning at the Southwest corner of Lot 1, Block 3, Edina Grove; thence Southeasterly along the extension of the West line of said Lot, a distance of 80 feet to a point of curve to the left with a radius of 210 feet; thence along said curve to the left to its intersection with the West line of the East 750 feet of the South 14 rods of said Government Lot 1; thence South along the West line of said East 750 feet to the South line of said Government Lot 1 and there terminating; and lying East of the West line of Edina Grove, and the Southerly extension of said West line to the South line of said Government Lot 1. All according to said recorded plat and United States Government Survey thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Except for the right of access tree trimming and temporary working area, said easement shall be limited to that part of the Premises (hereinafter called "Easement Area ") described as follows: M1D, A 10 foot wide easement lying between a line drawn parallel and 70 feet southwesterly of the northeasterly line of the above described Premises and a line drawn parallel and 60 feet southwesterly of the northeasterly line of the above described Premises except the South 33 feet thereof. (As shown on attached Exhibit B). The Easterly Six Hundred Sixty -Three (663) feet of the Northerly Six Hundred Sixty - Three (663) feet of the Northeast One Quarter (NE1 /4) of the Northwest One Quarter (NW1 /4) of Section Five (5), Township One Hundred Sixteen (116) North, Range Twenty -One (21) West of the Fifth (5th) Principal Meridian, according to the United States Government Survey thereof. Except for the right of access tree trimming and temporary working area, said easement shall be limited to that part of the Premises (hereinafter called `Basement Area ") described as follows: AND The South 10 feet of the North 43 feet of the West 630 feet and the West 10 feet of the East 43 feet of the South 198 feet of the North 231 feet of the above described Premises. (As shown on attached Exhibit C). Outlot 3, Scenic View Second Addition ALSO Parcel 1: That part of the North 20 rods of Government Lot 1, Section 32, Township 117 North, Range 21, West of the 5'' Principal Meridian, lying Easterly of the Northerly extension of the West line of Edina Grove and Westerly of Line A below described; Page 2 of 5 C:\ Users \WHouleWppData\Local\Microsoft \Windows \Temporary Internet Files \Content.0utlook\DYNBNG6]\2011 031 City of Edina Abstract.doc 01f.Y�7 Parcel 2: That part of the South 180 feet of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 32, Township 117, Range 21 lying Westerly of a line (herein called line A) described as follows: Commencing at a point on the South line of said North 20 rods 303 feet West of the East line of Government Lot 1; thence on an assumed bearing of North 89 degrees 59 minutes 30 seconds West along said South line a distance of 569.43 feet to the actual point of beginning of the line to be described; thence Northerly along a curve concave to the West, said curve having a radius of 265 feet, central angle of 37 degrees 34 minutes 46 seconds and a chord bearing of North 8 degrees 12 minutes 37 seconds East, an arc distance of 173.8 feet to a point of compound curve; thence Northwesterly along a curve concave to the Southwest, said curve having a radius of 450 feet and being tangent with the last described curve, to its intersection with the North line of the above mentioned South 180 feet and there terminating. All according to the recorded plat and United States Government Survey thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Except for the right of access tree trimming and temporary working area, said easement shall be limited to that part of the Premises (hereinafter called "Easement Area ") described as follows: The Northerly 10 feet of Outlot 3, Scenic View Second Addition. (As shown on attached Exhibit D). ALSO The Easterly 10 feet of the above described Parcel 1 and Parcel 2. (As shown on attached Exhibit D). The grant of easement herein contained shall also include the right of reasonable access to said easement across said lands for the purpose of exercising the rights granted herein, together with the right to remove from said Easement Area any structure, trees, shrubbery, or other object or obstruction which in Grantee's opinion interferes with said facilities or the removal of which may be reasonably necessary for the construction or maintenance thereof. Except as otherwise provided herein in any Underground Distribution Agreement between the Grantor and Grantee covering the above described premises, Grantee shall, after installation of the above described electrical facilities, or after the exercise of any rights granted herein, restore the lands subject to this easement to as near their original condition as is reasonably possible and remove therefrom all debris, spoils, and equipment resulting from or used in connection with said installation. Grantor further agrees that no structure or obstruction will be erected or permitted or any trees planted on or within said easement, that Grantor will not change the ground elevation thereof without the written consent of Grantee, or perform any act which will interfere with or endanger said electrical facilities. Grantor covenants with Grantee, its successors and assigned, that Grantor has the right to sell and convey an easement in the manner and form aforesaid. Grantee, at the request of the Grantor, shall relocate, remove, replace or reconnect at its own expense its facilities where such relocation, removal, replacement or reconnection is necessitated by any Page 3 of 5 C:\ Users \WHoule\AppData\Local\.Microsoft \Windows \Temporary Internet Files \Content.Outlook\DYNBNG6J\2011 031 City of Edina Abstract.doc t other project authorized by the Grantor in the Easement Area, regardless of whether the project is temporary or permanent. This instrument and the covenants and agreements contained herein are binding upon the Grantor, his personal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns. It is mutually understood and agreed that this instrument covers all the agreements and stipulations between the parties and that no representation or statements, verbal or written, have been made modifying, adding to or changing the terms hereof. This instrument is exempt from the Minnesota Deed Tax. SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS Page 4 of 5 C:\ Users \WHoule\AppData\Local\Microsoft \Windows \Temporary Internet Files \Content.0utlook\DYNBNG6J\2011 031 City of Edina Abstract.doc / IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this instrument to be duly executed as of the day of , 2011. By: Its: By: Its: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing, instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2011, by and the respectfully, of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public This instrument was-drafted by: BJA Northern States Power Company 414 Nicollet Mall, Minneapolis, MN 55401 Abstract 2011.031 Page 5 of 5 C:\ Users \WHoule\AppData\Local\Microsoft \Windows \Temporary Internet Files \Content.Outlook\DYNBNG6J\2011 031 City of Edina Abstract.doc NORTHERN STATES POWER N MINNESOTA EXHIBIT A Certificate of Survey Location: City of Edin, Hennepin County, Minnesota Grantor: City of Edina _ Scale: 1"=200' ,I 1 \ N i \IJt7L ��_J I r% t L-S -7 (' o A 4 f) QN'EF c� - W nr -r �)I LJ L R RIJ I I ......... I...... �; P.O.B. OF SIDELINE A 33 I 4"lai289 ra2ee o i nl \I VI It fL- J, I �� W AIIA14 / A f-NC L- '%AJ-1 JA I'm I / `t of Jvv I / `Y h� Ca26y22 o 7 Oa T A U- 0 �y W a Z 3 SOUTH LINE OF NW' /, OF SW' /a SECTION 32 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE XF�T E TATE OF MINNESOTA. DIST: EDINA PETER D. GIT N LIC. NO. 44901 SEC. 32, T.1 17N., R.211N., 5TH P.M. CO.: HENNEPIN DATETt�` NORTHERN STATES POWER N MINNESOTA EXHIBIT B = Certificate of Survey Location: City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota Grantor: City of Edina Scale: 1"=80' r- nINIA LUII .4 r-% 'V IJIL.VI z NORTH LINE OF SOUTH 14 RODS OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 32 JEFF PLACE Oic �G \� 6l) \7R\l \V L- I 1 \ I v I \' II I 0Z SW CORNER LOT 1 I - BLK3, DINAGWOVE -- M - - - -�— A )T /'\� (a/1\ ft_ )A 11 A CA IT 1 /'\T 4 ® (t\(n \ i �('lR \I VI \7VVL� \I VIVI EE 1111 L.VI I `O s ") SOUTH LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1, SECTION 32 W OLINGER BLVD -- --- - -- I - -- - -- -- I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT 1 AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE J�jI�TH S TE OF MINNESOTA. PETER D. GITZEN LIC. NO. 44901. M 01 DIST: EDINA SEC. 32, T.1 17N., R.21W., 5TH P.M. CO.:HENNEPIN DATE F--- i 1 h� A rl rl)TI/ -\nI UIIIIV n U V I LL 8 O l. �L IJA 7 I UA0 �Qp\ 71 r M 01 DIST: EDINA SEC. 32, T.1 17N., R.21W., 5TH P.M. CO.:HENNEPIN DATE i NORTHERN STATES POWER MINNESOTA EXHIBIT Q. Certificate of Survey Location: City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota Grantor: City of Edina N Scale: I"=100' Cq SE CORNER NORTH LINE OF NW114 SECTION 5 r i., SW1 /4, SEC. 32 co co OLINGER BLVD. -- -------- ------- 10 • I I I 1I n A I V r \ \ A VJ 1 i gW cN r. zz X31 LLJ M LO z z O M to LL L a F w z 663 I I, I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE OF MINNESOTA. DIST: EDINA PETER D. GITZEN LIC. NO. 44901 SEC. 5, T.116N., R.21W., 5TH P.M. ! ` CO.:HENNEPIN DATE Z\ NORTHERN STATES POWER MINNESOTA EXHIBIT D Certificate of Survey Location: City of Edina, Hennepin County, Minnesota Grantor: Citv of Edina I I � t t -- - 1 I IW i C7. 1 co 0 s LEL 21 7A ^)T nr Alf 4 1A S1111 IA nl- \1 VI IVL. I / `r, JY9 I / `r N Scale: 1" =100' .:L_v%,J{VU I\r-tLJLJI1 IV1V —� NORTH LIN F THE SOUTH 180 FEET OF THE NE' /, O/ IF SW %, SECTION 32 / V \ ® .:vL -IVIv \ V1LYV fir-{ ..` I R \ //. it T �0 A I1 h 1Tl(1A1� ` nUUI I Iv1 v I SOUTH LINE OF THE NE114 OF THE SWUM i — F\"',,',' N` LOT i nl \1 VI \7VVL1 \I VIVIL_IVI L -VI SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 20 RODS OF GOT. LOT 1, SECTION 32, T.117N, R.21 W DIST: EDINA SEC. 32, T.1 17N., R.21W., 5TH P.M. CO.: HENNEPIN OLINGER CIRCLE 1 l P.O.B. LINE W" B I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE L S OF HE T E OF MINNESOTA. PETER D. GITZEN U LIC. NO. 44901 DATE 9-d 1 111 'r L 'Y lam/ •lVV • REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # III. P. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE a4pk City Engineer ® Action F] Discussion Information Date: April 5, 2011 Subject: Construction Engineering Services for Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Project Recommendation: Authorize City Manager to approve attached proposal for Construction Services for Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Project. Info /Background: Attached is the proposal from SEH, Inc. for construction services for Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Project. This project is being awarded to Palda & Sons and is scheduled to begin early spring of 2011. The estimated fee for this service is $637,723.84. The combined fee for the feasibility, design, and construction services is estimated at $1,074,755, which is approximately 26% of the construction cost. The Country Club project, which is very similar in scope, had an overall combined fee of 29% of the construction cost. ATTACHMENTS: Construction Engineering Proposal Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Reconstruction Project g:\ engineering \contract numbers\2011 \eng 11 -5 minnehaho woods street & bridge reconstruction \admin \Item Iil.p. construction engineering services for minnehaha woods neighborhood roadway reconstruction project.docx March 30, 2011 Mr. Wayne Houle, PE Director of Public Works and City Engineer City of Edina Engineering and Public Works Facility 7450 Metro Blvd Edina, MN 55439 RB: .City of Edina Mimnehaha Woods Neigliborhood Roadway Improvements Construction Phase Services City C.ontractNo.'ENG 11 -5 SEH No. EDR4A113734 10.00 Dear Wayne: Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc ® (SEH) thanks you for the opportunity to assist the City of Edina (City) with construction phase services for the referenced project. We respectfully ask the City to consider this supplemental letter agreement that, if accepted, allows us to complete the project's implementation by providing construction phase engineering services. We will provide these services in accordance with our Agreement for Professional Engineering Services dated July 25, 1988, herein called the Agreement. We have enclosed a Task Hour Budget (THB) that describes our not -to- exceed fee of $637,723.84, scope, and key assumptions for this project. We will bill the City monthly on an hourly basis for labor and reimbursable expenses. if we invoice the City for the entire contract amount of our feasibility study preparation services, bid document preparation services,. and construction phase services, our total contract amount is approximately 26% of Palda and Sons, Inc. low bid price of $4,259,438.50. As_ a point of reference the entire contract amount for these same services in the Country Club Area Sewer, Water, and Street Reconstruction project was 29% of the low bid price. Please recall that just like Minneliaha Woods the Country Club project also featured the reconstruction of public utilities located in the right -of- way in addition to street reconstruction: This Supplemental Letter Agreement, THB, and the Agreement represent the entire understanding between the City of Edina and the SEH in respect to the project and may only be modified in writing if .signed by both parties. As always, please contact me at 952.912.2611 or ppasko@sehinc.com with questions or comments. Thanks again for choosing SEH. to provide the City tvitlt these services. Sin y, Paul J. asko III, PE Project Manager Enclosures p�aekkdna \113734119enW -c - aCI\- dtfUCd- pb=v,m+me,,vodsmw"pkhletieedom Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc., 10901 Red Circle Drive. Suite 300, Minnetonka. MN 55343.9302 SEH is an equal opportunity employer I www.sehinc.con, 1 952.912.2600 1 000.734.6757 1 952.912.2601 fax 4- 6' /k Task Hour Budget SEH City of Edina Minnehaha Woods Neighborhood Roadway Improvements (11) Construction Phase Services March 30, 2011 P:\AE \E\Edina\ 113734 \1Genl\10- Contract\Construction PhasegHB MinneWoods Const Phase council.xlsx]Hours -Costs Page 1 of 2 ESTIMATED COST PROJECT COST SUMMARY PROJECT TASKS PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES 1.0 Subtotal Hours Construction Staking Subtotal Labor Cost 1.1 Provide Construction Staking Services (1 )(15) Subtotal SEH Expenses 10 $18,212.41 Subtotal Hours $637,723.84 TOTAL COST ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROPOSAL: $637,723.84 Subtotal Labor Cost $89,294 2.0 RPR 2.1 Provide RPR Services 2 3 5 14 18 Subtotal Hours Subtotal Labor Cost $382,642 3.0 Construction Administration 3.1 Construction Administration (4) (6) (7) (8) (9) (18) 3.2 Provide as -built drawings and service information (13) (16) (17) 3.3 Prepare Final Assessment Roll in August 2012 3.4 Assessment Hearin 12 Subtotal Hours Subtotal Labor Cost $147,576 P:\AE \E\Edina\ 113734 \1Genl\10- Contract\Construction PhasegHB MinneWoods Const Phase council.xlsx]Hours -Costs Page 1 of 2 ESTIMATED COST PROJECT COST SUMMARY PROVIDE CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES Subtotal Hours 5,908 Subtotal Labor Cost $619,511.43 Subtotal SEH Expenses 10 $18,212.41 Subtotal $637,723.84 TOTAL COST ASSOCIATED WITH THIS PROPOSAL: $637,723.84 P:\AE \E\Edina\ 113734 \1Genl\10- Contract\Construction PhasegHB MinneWoods Const Phase council.xlsx]Hours -Costs Page 1 of 2 NOTES (1) Includes hours to verify the control used by the City for the topographic survey and/or set new control if needed. (2) SEH will use,the City's format for a Daily Construction Report. (3) This task assumes that the City will secure material inspection services and make these services available to SEH. (4) SEH will copy, fold, and provide the mailing labels for any update newsletters. City staff will insert these updates into envelopes, attach the mailing label and postage and send the updates from City Hall. (5) SEH will provide 1 RPR for 50 hours per week between 4/25/11 and 4/30/11 (1 week), 2 RPR's for 50 hours per week between'5 /2/11 and 5/7/11 (1 week), 2.5 RPR's for 50 hours per week between 5/9/11 and 7/29/11 (12 weeks), 2 RPR's for 50 hours per week between 8/1/11 and '10 /29/11 (13 weeks), 1.5 RPR's for 40 hours per. week between 10 /31/11 and 12/2/11 (5 week),1 RPR for 20 hours per week between 12/5/11 and 12/30/11 (4 weeks), and 1'RPR for 20 hours per week between 4/30/12 and 6/29/12 (9 weeks). (6) For each Application for Payment (AFP) SEH will use its format for tracking monthly quantities per City funding source, the City's format for the cover sheet of the AFP, and the SEH format for the AFP's subsequent pages. (7) SEH assumes preparation of five (5) resident update newsletters. One newsletter will be distributed after the award of the project and two (2) newsletters per each stage of the project to the entire neighborhood. These updates will be in a .docx format. These updates will include suggesting that residents subscribe to the City Extra list serve tool and a project networking account. If enough residents sign up for the list serve tool and project networking account, SEH will only prepare and submit .docx files to the City for the City to distribute to the residents using their list serve tool. (8) Task includes scheduling and conducting a pre - construction meeting, preparing and sending the City minutes of pre - construction meeting for distribution, attending weekly on site progress meetings, preparing and sending the City minutes of those meetings for distribution, preparing applications for payments, preparing any necessary change orders, and the preparation bf as -built drawings. (9) Includes hours to review shop drawings. (10) Reimbursable expenses include printing, auto allowances, mileage, and survey equipment. (11) All contractor reconstruction work shall be completed prior to October 28, 2011 except for the spring 2012 punchlist walk through. (12) Other than preparing the final assessment roll and providing technical backup during the hearing itself, SEH will not provide any other services for the assessment hearing. (13) As -built drawing requirements concerning labeling, required data, and submittal materials will follow the City of Edina record drawing procedure dated April 15, 2009. (14) RPR duties include taking digital photographs of every water service and sanitary sewer service reconstruction at the corp stop, curb stop, sanitary wye, and connection point with the existing sanitary sewer service. Shown in each digital photograph will be a time/date stamp and a dry erase board labeled with the specific address. (15) Includes hours to gather asbuilt information. (16) SEH will submit a .xlsx spreadsheet titled "Summary of Private Sanitary Sewer and Water Service Pipe Reconstruction ", with column labels matching the assessment roll and additional columns detailing the information gathered for each sanitary sewer and water service pipe by the Edina Building Department and during construction by SEH. (17) Abbuilt information will include asbuilt plansheets in pdf format, speadsheet of XYZ locates, AutoCAD file of proposed utilities linelwork and XYZ locates, spreadsheet titled "Summary of Private Sanitary Sewer avid Water Service Pipe Reconstruction ", copies of Edina Building Department sanitary sewer and water service pipe reconstruction notes, SEH sanitary sewer and water service pipe reconstruction notes, and'the digital photographs for each address of the santiary sewer service and water service pipes detailed above. (18) SEH will use project networking communications such as twittencom to update the project residents, who sign up, about daily construction activities that may affect them. A City approved, project specific account will beset up using SEH's existing twitter account. Twitter account sign up information will be included with the resident newsletters. SEH will assign one individual to create the communications for the duration of the project to keep comminucations consistent. Page 2 of 2 •lv v • REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # III. Q. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE ® Action City Engineer F-1 Discussion ❑ Information Date: April 5,2011' Subject: Resolution No. 2011 -43 Approving Construction Grant Agreement Between Metropolitan Council and the City of Edina for Inflow and Infiltration Abatement Projects Recommendation: Authorize Mayor to sign resolution and Mayor and City Manager to sign attached grant agreement. Info /Background: Inflow and infiltration (1 /1) has been an issue with both the metropolitan region and the local sanitary sewer collection systems. 1/1 is clear water (rain or ground water) that makes its' way into the waste water collection system and does not need to be treated by the Metropolitan Council's Waste Water Treatment Plants. To help cities such as Edina the Minnesota Legislature has appropriated $3,000,000 to the Metropolitan Council for a grant program to be administered by the Council for the purpose of providing grants to municipalities for capital improvements to public municipal wastewater collection systems to reduce the amount of 1/1 into the system. The City of Edina is eligible for $119,923. The monies from this grant will be utilized for relining the sanitary sewer mainlines on many of the local roadway reconstruction projects. Due to the monies coming from the state general obligation bonds there are stipulations that the City must meet, such as, the project must utilize prevailing wages be paid for this type of work and the City must use the e- verification to verify that newly hired employees are legally entitled to work in the United States. The e- verification system is a free internet based system operated by US Citizenship and Immigration Services and the Social Security Administration. Staff feels that both of these stipulations can be met. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution • Construction Grant Agreement between Metropolitan Council and the City of Edina for Inflow and Infiltration Abatement Projects g:\ engine- 1 \infros- 1 \sanito -1 \mcesin- 1 \2010mc -1 \agreem -1 \Item iii. q. resolution no. 2011 -43 approving construction grant agreement between metropolitan council and the city of edina for Inflow and Infiltration abatement projects.docx RESOLUTION NO. 2011-43 APPROVING CONSTRUCTION GRANT AGREEMENT NO. SG2011 -002 BETWEEN METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND THE CITY OF EDINA FOR INFLOW AND INFILTRATION ABATEMENT PROJECTS City of Edina WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature has appropriated to the Metr politan Council in the 2010 Session Laws Chapter 189, Section 16, subdivision 3, $3,000,000 for a grant program to be administered by the Council for the purpose of providing grants to municipalities for capital improvements to public municipal wastewater collection systems to reduce the amount of inflow and infiltration to the Council's metropolitan sanitary sewer disposal system (1/1 Municipal Grant Program "); and WHEREAS, the City of Edina submitted an application for grant funds and the Council identified the City has a contributor of excessive inflow and infiltration to the Council's metropolitan sanitary sewer disposal system and thus an eligible applicant for grant funds of $119,923 under the 1/1 Municipal Grant Program; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council approves the Construction Grant Agreement with the Metropolitan Council and the City of Edina. ADOPTED this 5th day of April, 2011. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of April 5, 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 City Clerk G: \Engineering \Infrastructure \Sanitary Sewer\MCES I n I program\2010 MCES Grant Application\Agreement \Resolution No. 2011 -43 Approving Construction Grant Agreement Between Metropolitan Council and the City of Edina for Inflow and Infiltration Abatement Projects.docx City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CONTRACT NO. SG2011 -002 Metropolitan Council Municipal Publicly Owned Infrastructure Inflow /Infiltration Grant Program State of Minnesota General Obligation Bond Proceeds Grant Agreement — Construction Grant for the Edina 2010 -2011 Inflow and Infiltration Abatement Project TABLE OF CONTENTS RECITALS Article I - DEFINITIONS Section 1.01— Defined Terms Article II - GRANT Section 2.01— Grant of Monies Section 2.02 — Public Ownership Section 2.03 — Use of Grant Proceeds Section 2.04 — Operation of the Real Property and Facility Section 2.05 — Grantee Representations and Warranties Section 2.06 — Ownership by Leasehold or Easement Section 2.07 — Event(s) of Default Section 2.08 — Remedies Section 2.09 — Notification of Event of Default Section 2.10 — Survival of Event of Default Section 2.11 — Term of Grant Agreement Section 2.12 — Modification and/or Early Termination of Grant Section 2.13 — Excess Funds. Article III — USE CONTRACTS [NOT TO BE USED IN THIS AGREEMENT] Section 3.01 — General Provisions Section 3.02 — Initial Term and Renewal Section 3.03 — Reimbursement of Counterparty Section 3.04 — Receipt of Monies Under a Use Contract Article IV — SALE Section 4.01 — Sale Section 4.02 — Proceeds of Sale Article V — COMPLIANCE WITH G.O. COMPLIANCE LEGISLATION AND THE COMMISSIONER'S ORDER Section 5.01 — State Bond Financed Property Section 5.02 — Preservation of Tax Exempt Status Section 5.03 — Changes to G.O. Compliance Legislation or the Commissioner's Order Article VI — DISB Section 6.01 Section 6.02 Section 6.03 Section 6.04 Section 6.05 URSEMENT OF GRANT PROCEEDS — The Advances — Draw Requisitions — Additional Funds — Condition Precedent to Any Advance — Construction Inspections. Article VII- MISCELLANEOUS Section 7.01 - Insurance Section 7.02 - Condemnation Section 7.03 - Use, Maintenance, Repair and Alterations Section 7.04 - Records Keeping and Reporting Section 7.05 - Inspections by Council Section 7.06 - Data Practices Section 7.07 - Non - Discrimination Section 7.08 - Worker's Compensation Section 7.09 - Antitrust Claims Section 7.10 - Review of Plans and Cost Estimates [NOT TO BE USED] Section 7.11 - Prevailing Wages Section 7.12 - Liability Section 7.13 - Indemnification by the Grantee Section 7.14 - Relationship of the Parties Section 7.15 -Notices Section 7.16 - Binding Effect and Assignment or Modification Section 7.17 - Waiver Section 7.18 - Entire Agreement Section 7.19 - Choice of Law and Venue Section 7.20 - Severability Section 7.21- Time of Essence Section 7.22 - Counterparts Section 7.23 - Matching Funds Section 7.24 - Source and Use of Funds Section 7.25 - Project Completion Schedule Section 7.26 - Third -Party Beneficiary Section 7.27 - Grantee Tasks Section 7.28 - Council and Commissioner Required Acts and Approvals Section 7.29 - Applicability to Real Property and Facility Section 7.30 - E- Verification Section 7.31 - Additional Requirements Section 7.32 - Termination Due to Lack of Funds Section 7.33 - Grant Program Remainder Funds Attachment I - DECLARATION Attachment I -A - CERTIFICATION Attachment II - LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF REAL PROPERTY Attachment III - SOURCE AND USE OF FUNDS Attachment IV - PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND COMPLETION SCHEDULE 0 CONTRACT NO. SG2011 -002 GENERAL OBLIGATION GRANT PROCEEDS MUNICIPAL PUBLICLY OWNED INFRASTRUCTURE INFLOWANFILTRATION GRANT PROGRAM INTERGOVERNMENTAL GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN METROPOLITAN COUNCIL AND EDINA This Intergovernmental Grant Agreement ( "Grant Agreement ") is made this day of , 2010, and entered into by and between Metropolitan Council a public corporation and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota ( "Council ") and Edina, a Minnesota Municipal corporation ( "Grantee "). BACKGROUND RECITALS 1. The Minnesota Legislature has appropriated to the Council in the 2010 Session Laws Chapter 189, Section 16, subdivision 3, $3,000.,000 for a grant program to be administered by the Council for the purpose of providing grants to municipalities for capital improvements to public municipal wastewater collection systems to reduce the amount of inflow and infiltration to the Council's metropolitan sanitary sewer disposal system ( "I/I Municipal Grant Program "). 2. The monies allocated to fund the appropriation to the Council are proceeds of state general obligation bonds authorized to be issued under Article XI, § 5(a) of the Minnesota Constitution. 3. The Council has gone through a public process and formally adopted Guidelines for the I/I Municipal Grant Program. Grantee has read and understands the Council Guidelines ( "Council Guidelines "). C I 1 4. Council has identified Grantee as a contributor of excessive inflow and infiltration to the Council's metropolitan sanitary sewer disposal system and thus an eligible applicant for grant funds under the I/I Municipal Grant Program. 5. Pursuant to its authority under Minnesota Statutes § 444.075 [or other authority, if different], Grantee operates a municipal wastewater collection system identified as the Edina Wastewater Collection System ( "Wastewater System ") and has submitted an application for grant funds including a timeline for an inflow and infiltration mitigation capital improvement project to the Wastewater System to the Council in accordance with Council's Guidelines. For purposes of this Agreement, the term "Governmental Program" means the Wastewater System. 6. Council has reviewed and found eligible Grantee's application for grant funds and has awarded such grant funds ( "G.O. Grant ") to Grantee to construct a capital improvement project to Grantee's pipeline as described in and in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Grant Agreement. 7. The Grantee's receipt and use of the I/I Municipal Grant Program to acquire an ownership interest in and/or improve real property (the "Real Property ") and structures situated thereon (the "Facility ") will cause the Grantee's ownership interest in all of such real property and structures to become "state bond financed property ", as such term is used in Minn. Stat. § 16A.695 (the "G.O. Compliance Legislation ") and in that certain "Third Order Amending Order of the Commissioner of Finance Relating to Use and Sale of State Bond Financed Property" executed by the Commissioner of Minnesota Management and Budget and dated August 26, 2010 (the "Commissioner's Order "), even though such funds shall only be a portion of the funds being used to acquire such ownership interest and /or improve such real property and structures and that such funds may be used to only acquire such ownership interest and/or improve a part of such real property and structures. • 4 8. Council and Grantee desire to set forth herein the provisions relating to the granting of such G.O. Grant and the disbursement thereof to Grantee and the operation of the Real Property and the Facility. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the G.O. Grant described and other provisions in this Agreement, Council and Grantee agree as follows: Article I DEFINITIONS Section 1.01 Defined Terms. As used in this Agreement, the following terms shall have the meanings set out respectively after each such term (the meanings to be equally applicable to both the singular and plural forms of the terms defined), unless the context specifically indicates otherwise: "Advance(s)" — means an advance made or to be made by the Council to the Grantee and disbursed in accordance with the provisions contained in Article VI hereof. "Agreement" - means this Metropolitan Municipal Publicly Owned Infrastructure Inflow /Infiltration Grant Program Grant Agreement - Construction Grant for the Edina 2010 -2011 Inflow and Infiltration Abatement Project, as such exists on its original date and any amendments, modifications or restatements thereof. "Approved Debt" — means public or private debt of the Public Entity that is consented to and approved, in writing, by the Commissioner of MMB, the proceeds of which were or will used to acquire an ownership interest in or improve the Real Property and Facility, other than the debt on the G.O. Bonds. Approved Debt includes, but is not limited to, all debt delineated in Attachment III to this Agreement; provided, however, the Commissioner of MMB is not bound by any amounts delineated in such attachment unless he /she has consented, in writing, to such amounts. "Architect ", if any - means , which will administer the Construction Contract Documents on behalf of the Grantee. "Certification" —'means a certification in the form contained in Attachment 1- A to this Agreement and all amendments thereto, acknowledging that the Real Property and Facilities is state bond financed property within the meaning of Minn. Stat. § 16A.695, is subject to the requirements imposed by such statutes and cannot be sold, encumbered or otherwise disposed of without the approval of the Commissioner of the MMB. 5 "Code" - means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time, and all treasury regulations, revenue procedures and revenue rulings issued pursuant thereto. "Commissioner of MMB" - means the commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Management and Budget, and any designated representatives thereof. "Commissioner's Order" - means that certain "Third Order Amending Order of the Commissioner of Finance Relating to Use and Sale of State Bond Financed Property" executed by the Commissioner of Minnesota Management and Budget and dated August 26, 2010. "Completion Date" — means September 30, 2012; the date of projected completion of the Project. "Contractor" - means any person engaged to work on or to furnish materials and supplies for the Construction Items including, a general contractor. "Construction Contract Documents" - means the document or documents, in form and substance acceptable to the Council, including but not limited to any construction plans and specifications and any exhibits, amendments, change orders, modifications thereof or supplements thereto, which collectively form the contract between the Grantee and the Contractor or Contractors for the completion of the Construction Items on or before the Completion Date for either a fixed price or a guaranteed maximum price. "Construction Items" — means the work to be performed under the Construction Contract Documents. "Council - means the entity identified as the "Metropolitan Council" in the lead -in paragraph of this Agreement. "Declaration" - means a declaration, or declarations, in the form contained in Attachment I to this Agreement and all amendments thereto, indicating that the Grantee's ownership interest in the Real Property and Facility is state bond financed property within the meaning of the G.O. Compliance Legislation and is subject to certain restrictions imposed thereby. "Draw Requisition" - means a draw requisition that the Grantee, or its designee, submits to the Council when an Advance is requested, as referred to in Section 6.02. G "Easement Premises" - means the real estate and structures, granted to the Grantee under an easement. "Event of Default" - means one or more of those events delineated in Section 2.07. "Facility" means, the Wastewater Systems identified in Recital No. 5 of this Agreement which is located, or will be constructed and located, on the Real Property and all equipment that is a part thereof that was purchased with the proceeds. "Fair Market Value" — means either (i) the price that would be paid by a willing and qualified buyer to a willing and qualified seller as determined by an appraisal that assumes that all liens and encumbrances on the property being sold that negatively affect the value of such property, will be paid and released, or (ii) the price bid by a purchaser under a public bid procedure after reasonable public notice, with the proviso that all liens and encumbrances on the property being sold that. negatively affect the value of such property, will be paid and released at the time of acquisition by the purchaser. "G.O. Bonding Legislation" — means the legislation delineated in Recital Nos. 1 and 2 hereinabove as the G.O. Bonding Legislation. "G.O: Bonds" - means that portion of the state general obligation bonds issued under the authority granted in Article XI, § 5(a) of the Minnesota Constitution, the proceeds of which are used to fund the G.O. Grant and any state bonds issued to refund or replace such bonds. "G.O. Compliance Legislation" - means Minn. Stat. § 16A.695 as such may subsequently be amended, modified or replaced from time to time unless such amendment, modification or replacement imposes an unconstitutional impairment of a contract right. "G.O. Grant" means a grant of monies from the Council to the Grantee in the amount identified as the "G.O. Grant" in Section 2.01 (b) to this Agreement, as the amount thereof may be modified under the provisions contained herein. "Governmental Program" means the operation of the Real Property and the Facility for the purpose specified and identified in Recital No. 5 of this Agreement as the Governmental Program. "Grantee" - means the entity identified as the "Grantee" in the lead -in paragraph of this Agreement. "Initial Acquisition and Betterment Costs" — means the cost to acquire the Grantee's ownership interest in the Real Property and Facility if the Grantee does not already possess the required ownership interest, and the costs of betterments of the Real Property and Facility; provided, however, the Council and the 7 Commissioner of MMB are not bound by any specific amount of such alleged costs unless consented to in writing. "Inspecting Engineer", if any - means the Council's construction inspector, or its designated consulting engineer. "Outstanding Balance of the G.O. Grant— means the portion of the G.O. Grant that has been disbursed to or on behalf of the Grantee minus any portion thereof previously paid back to the Commissioner of MMB. "Ownership Value ", if any — means the value, if any, of the Grantee's ownership interest in the Real Property and Facility that existed concurrent with the Grantee's execution of this Agreement. Such value shall be established by way of an appraisal or by such other manner as may be acceptable to the Council and the Commissioner of MMB. The parties hereto agree and acknowledge that such value is $ or Not Applicable; provided, however, the Commissioner of MMB is not bound by any inserted dollar amount unless he /she has consented, in writing, to such amount. If no dollar amount is inserted and the blank "Not Applicable" is not checked, a rebuttable presumption that the Ownership Value is $0.00 shall be created. (The blank "Not Applicable" should only be selected and checked when a portion of the funds delineated in Attachment III attached hereto are to be used to acquire the Grantee's ownership interest in the Real Property and, Facility, and in such event the value of such ownership interest should be shown in Attachment III and not in this definition for Ownership Value). "Project" - means the Grantee's acquisition, of the ownership interests in the Real Property and, Facility denoted in Section 2.02 along with the performance of activities denoted in Section 2.03. (If the Grantee is not using any portion of the G.O. Grant to acquire the ownership interest denoted in Section 2.02, then this definition for Project shall not include the acquisition of such ownership interest, and the value of such ownership interest shall not be included in Attachment III hereto and instead shall be included in the definition for Ownership Value under this Section.) "Real Property" - means the real property located in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota and identified in Attachment II to this Agreement by legal description, narrative description or diagram. "Subsequent Betterment Costs" — means the costs of betterments of the Real Property and Facility that occur subsequent to the date of this Agreement, are not part of the Project, would qualify as a public improvement of a capital nature (as such term in used in Minn. Constitution Art. XI, §5(a) of the Minnesota Constitution), and the cost of which has been established by way of written documentation that is acceptable to and approved, in writing, by the Council and the Commissioner of MMB. "Useful Life of the Real Property and Facility" — means (i) 30 years for Real Property that has no structure situated thereon or if any structures situated thereon will be removed, and no new. structures will be constructed thereon, (ii) the remaining useful life of the Facility as of the effective' date of this Agreement for Facilities that are situated on the Real Property as of the date of this Agreement, that will remain on the Real Property, and that will not be bettered, or (iii) the useful life of the Facility after the completion of the construction or betterments for Facilities that are to be constructed or bettered. Article II GRANT Section 2.01(a). Grant of Monies. The Council shall make and issue the G.O. Grant to the Grantee, for payment of Project items as described in Attachment IV to this Agreement and disburse the proceeds in accordance with. the provisions of this Agreement. The G.O. Grant is not intended to be a loan even though the portion thereof that is disbursed may need to be returned to the Council or the Commissioner of MMB under certain circumstances. Section 2.01(b). Maximum Expected Grant Amount ( "Maximum Grant Amount "). The Council will pay to Grantee a Maximum Grant Amount during the Grant Project activity period of up to $119,923 ( "Maximum Grant Amount "). However, in no event will the actual amount that the Council will pay to the Grantee for this Agreement exceed one -half of the actual amount expended by the Grantee on eligible expenses as specified in Section 2.01(a). Neither the Council nor the MMB shall bear any responsibility for a cost overrun which may be incurred by the Grantee in performance of the Project. The actual Grant Amount will be determined by the Council upon submission by Grantee to Council of reasonable, eligible and verifiable costs submitted in accordance with the terms of this Agreement for the Grant Project as described in Attachment IV. Section 2.02 Public Ownership. The Grantee acknowledges and agrees that the. G.O. Grant is being funded with the proceeds of G.O. Bonds, and as a result thereof all of the Real Property and Facility must be owned by one or more public entities. Such ownership may be in the form of fee ownership or an easement. In order to establish that this public ownership requirement is satisfied, the Grantee represents and warrants to the Council that it has, or will acquire, the following ownership interests in the Real Property and Facility, and, in addition, that it possesses, or will possess, all easements necessary for the operation, maintenance and management of the Real Property and Facility in the manner specified in Section 2.04: (Check the appropriate box for the Real Property for the Facility.) Ownership Interest in the Real Property. 6 Fee simple ownership of the Real Property. An easement for the Real Property that complies with the requirements contained in Section 2.06. (If the term of the easement is for a term authorized by a Minnesota statute, rule or session law, then insert the citation: ) Ownership Interest in the Facility. Fee simple ownership of the Facility. Not applicable because there is no Facility. Section 2.03 Use of Grant Proceeds. The Grantee shall use the G.O. Grant solely to reimburse itself for expenditures it has already made in the performance of the Project as described in Attachment IV to this Agreement, and may not use the G.O. Grant for any other purpose. The Project as described in Attachment IV consists of the following: (Check all appropriate boxes.) ❑ Acquisition of fee simple title to the Real Property. ❑ Acquisition of an easement for the Real Property. ❑ Improvement of the Real Property. ❑ Acquisition of fee simple title to the Facility. ❑ Construction of the Facility. ® Renovation of the Facility. (Describe other or additional purposes.) Further, Grantee agrees to perform and complete in a satisfactory manner the Project as described in Grantee's application for assistance under the Council's I/I Municipal Grant Program, which application is incorporated into Attachment IV of this Agreement by reference, and in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Specifically, the Grantee agrees to perform the Project in accordance with a specific timeline, all as described in Attachment IV and to undertake the financial 10 responsibilities described in Attachment III to this Agreement. The Grantee has the responsibility for and obligation to complete the Project as described in Attachment III and IV. The Council makes no representation or warranties with respect to the success and effectiveness of the Project. The G.O. Grant cannot be. used for normal municipal operating or overhead costs related to the Project. G.O. Grant funds cannot be used for the costs of studies or for engineering or planning costs, or for equipment, machinery, supplies or other property necessary to conduct the Project except for equipment, supplies or other property which will be used primarily for the Project and that are specifically listed in Attachment IV. Section 2.04 Operation of the Real Property and Facility. The Real Property and Facility must be used by the Grantee or the Grantee must cause such Real Property and Facility to be used for the operation of the Governmental Program or for such other use as the Minnesota legislature may from time to time designate, and for no other purposes or uses. Grantee must annually determine that the Real Property and Facility is being used for the purpose required by this Agreement, and has or has not been sold, abandoned, leased or subjected to a management contract or an agreement for use of the Real Property and Facility and shall annually supply a statement from an officer of the Grantee, sworn to before a notary public, to such. effect to the Council and the Commissioner of MMB. For those programs, if any, that the Grantee will directly operate on all or any portion of the Real Property and Facility, the Grantee covenants with and represents and warrants to the Council that: (i) it has the ability and a plan to fund such programs, (ii) it has demonstrated such ability by way of a plan that it submitted to the Council, and (iii) it will annually adopt,_ by resolution, a budget for the operation of such programs that clearly shows that forecast program revenues along with other funds available for the operation of such program will be equal to or greater than forecast program expenses for each fiscal year, and will supply, upon request, to the Council and the Commissioner of MMB certified copies of such resolution and budget. For the purpose of this paragraph only, the budget(s) for the specific Governmental Program(s) supported by this G.O. Grant may be combined with other programs of the Grantee. Section 2.05 Grantee Representations. and Warranties. The Grantee further covenants with, and represents and warrants to the Council as follows: A. It has legal authority to enter into, execute, and deliver this Agreement, the Certification or Declaration, and all documents referred to herein, has taken all actions necessary to its execution and delivery of such documents, and provided to the Council a copy of a resolution by its governing body which authorizes Grantee to enter into this Agreement, to undertake the I/I Municipal Grant Program and Project, including the Grantee financial responsibilities as shown in Attachment IV and which also designates an authorized representative for the Project who is authorized to provide certifications required in this Agreement and submit pay claims for reimbursement of Project costs. B. It has legal authority to use the G.O. Grant for the purpose or purposes described in this Agreement and has received a copy of, has read and understands the Council Guidelines for the Council's I/I Municipal Grant Program. C. It has legal authority to operate the Governmental Program. D. This Agreement, the Declaration or Certification as applicable and all other documents referred to herein are the legal, valid and binding obligations of the Grantee enforceable against the Grantee in accordance with their respective terms. E. It will comply with all of the terms, conditions, provisions, covenants, requirements, and warranties in this Agreement, the Declaration or Certification as applicable and all other documents referred to herein. F. It will comply with all of the provisions and requirements contained in and imposed by the G.O. Compliance Legislation, the Commissioner's Order, and the G.O. Bonding Legislation. G. It has made no material false statement or misstatement of fact in connection with its receipt of the G.O. Grant, and all of the information it has submitted or will submit to the Council or Commissioner of MMB relating to the G.O. Grant or the disbursement of any of the G.O. Grant is and will be true and correct. It agrees that all representations contained in its application for the G.O. Grant are material representations of fact upon which the Council relied in awarding this G.O. Grant and are incorporated into this Agreement by reference. H. It is not in violation of any provisions of its charter or of the laws of the State of Minnesota, and there are no material actions, suits, or proceedings pending, or to its knowledge threatened, before any judicial body or governmental authority against or affecting it relating to the Real Property and Facility, or its ownership interest therein, and it is not in default with respect to any order, writ, injunction, decree, or demand of any court or any governmental authority which would impair its ability to enter into this Agreement, the Declaration or Certification as applicable, or any document referred. to herein, or to perform any of the acts required of it in such documents. I. Neither the execution and delivery of this Agreement, the Declaration or Certification, or any document referred to herein nor compliance with any of the terms, conditions, requirements, or provisions contained in any of such documents is prevented by, is a breach of, or will result in a breach of, any term, condition, or provision of any agreement or document to which it is now a party or by which it is bound. 12 J. The contemplated use of the Real Property and Facility will not violate any applicable zoning or use statute, ordinance, building code, rule or regulation, or any covenant or agreement of record relating thereto. K. The Project will be completed in full compliance with all applicable laws, statutes, rules, ordinances, and regulations issued by any federal, state, or local political subdivisions having jurisdiction over the Project. L. All applicable licenses, permits and bonds required for the performance and completion of the Project have been, or will be, obtained. M. All applicable licenses, permits and bonds required for the operation of the Real Property and Facility in the manner specified in Section 2.04 have been, or will be, obtained. N. It will operate, maintain, and manage the Real Property and Facility or cause the Real Property and Facility, to be operated, maintained and managed in compliance with all applicable laws, statutes, rules, ordinances, and regulations issued by any federal, state, or local political subdivisions having jurisdiction over the Real Property and Facility. O. It has complied with the financial responsibility requirements contained in Section 7.23. P. While this Agreement is in effect, it will not, without the prior written consent of the Council and the Commissioner of MMB, allow any voluntary lien or encumbrance or involuntary lien or encumbrance that can be satisfied by the payment of monies and which is not being actively contested to be created or exist against the Grantee's ownership interest in the Real Property or Facility. Provided, however, the Council and the Commissioner of MMB will consent to any such lien or encumbrance that secures the repayment of a loan the repayment of which will not impair or burden the funds needed to operate the Real Property and Facility in the manner specified in Section 2.04, and for which the entire amount is used (i) to acquire additional real estate that is needed to so operate the Real Property and Facility in accordance with the requirements imposed under Section 2.04 and will be included in and as part of the Grantee's ownership interest in the Real Property and Facility, and /or (ii) to pay for capital improvements that are needed to so operate the Real Property and Facility in accordance with the requirements imposed under Section 2.04. Q: It reasonably expects to possess the ownership interest in the Real Property and Facility described Section 2.02 for the entire Useful Life of the Real Property and Facility, and it does not expect to sell, transfer or abandon such ownership interest. 13 R. It does not reasonably expect to receive payments under a contract for use of the Real Property or Facility, including leases,or management contracts, in excess of the amount the Grantee needs and is authorized to use to pay the operating expenses of the portion of the Real Property and Facility that is the subject of such contract or to pay the principal, interest, redemption premiums, and other expenses on any Approved Debt. S. It will supply, or cause to be supplied, whatever funds are needed above and beyond the amount of the G.O. Grant to complete and fully pay for the Project. T. The Construction Items will be completed substantially in accordance with the Construction Contract Documents by the Completion Date, and all such items along with the Facility will be situated entirely on the Real Property. U. It will require the Contractor or Contractors to comply with all rules, regulations, ordinances, and laws bearing on its performance under the Construction Contract Documents. V. If all or any portion of the Governmental Program does not qualify for the Waiver of Real Property Declaration granted by MMB, a copy of which is attached to and incorporated hereto as Attachment V, it has submitted to the Commissioner of MMB a written request that a declaration need not be recorded against the Real Property and if applicable, the Facility because such recording would be unduly onerous or impracticable and has received from the Commissioner of MMB a written waiver stating that a Declaration need not be recorded against the Real Property and if applicable, the Facility, a copy of which waiver is attached to the Certification submitted as Attachment IA of this Agreement. [Grantee should delete this Section is Grantee does not intend to apply for Waiver or intends to apply under Council's Waiver.] W. It has executed and submitted�a copy of one or more of the following to the Council and Minnesota Management and Budget, such that all parts of the facility are covered by one of the following: 1. For all or part of the Governmental Programs which qualifies for the Waiver of Real Property Declaration granted by Minnesota Management and Budget to the Council and attached as Attachment V, the Certification attached as Attachment IA of this Grant Agreement; or 2. For all or part of the Governmental Program which does not qualify for the Waiver of Real Property Declaration granted to the Council, but for which Grantee has obtained a Waiver of Real Property Declaration from the Minnesota Management and Budget pursuant to Section 2.05 (V) of this Agreement, the Certification attached as Attachment IA, together with a copy of the waiver; or 14 3. A fully executed Declaration in the form attached to this Agreement as Attachment I, such Declaration recorded or to be promptly recorded with the appropriate governmental office, and a copy of such recorded Declaration to be delivered to the Council and Minnesota Management and Budget. X. It shall furnish such satisfactory evidence regarding the representations and warranties described herein as may be required and requested by either the Council or the Commissioner of MMB. Section 2.06 Ownership by Easement. A. A Real Property/Facility easement must comply with the following provisions. 1. The Grantee is the grantee of easement and the easement creates the functional equivalency of fee ownership for the length of its term. 2. It must be permanent for a term that is equal to or greater than 125% of the Useful Life of the Real Property and Facility, or such other period of time specifically authorized by a Minnesota statute, rule or session law. 3. It must not contain any requirements or obligations of the Grantee that if not complied with could result in a termination thereof. 4. It must contain a provision that provides sufficient authority to allow the Grantee to operate the Real Property and Facility in accordance with the requirements imposed under Section 2.04. 5. It must not contain any provisions that would limit or impair the Grantee's operation of the Real Property and Facility in accordance with the requirements imposed under Section 2.04. 6. It must allow for a transfer thereof in the event that the grantee under the easement makes the necessary determination to sell its interest therein, and allow such interest to be transferred to the purchaser of such interest. B. The provisions contained in this Section are not intended to and shall not prevent the Grantee from including additional provisions in the easement that are not inconsistent with or contrary to the requirements contained in this Section. C. The Grantee shall fully and completely comply with all of the terms, conditions and provisions contained in the easement, and shall file the easement in the Office of the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles. 15 Section 2.07 Event(s) of Default. The following events shall, unless waived in writing by the Council and the Commissioner of MMB, constitute an Event of Default under this Agreement upon either the Council or the Commissioner of MMB giving the Grantee 30 days written notice of such event and the Grantee's failure to cure such event during such 30 day time period for those Events of Default that can be cured within 30 days or within whatever time period is needed to cure those Events of Default that cannot be cured within ' 30 days as long as the Grantee is using its best efforts to cure and is making reasonable progress in curing such Events of Default, however, in no event shall the time period to cure any Event of Default exceed 6 months unless otherwise consented to, in writing, by the Council and the Commissioner of MMB. A. If any representation, covenant, or warranty made by the Grantee in this Agreement, in any Draw Requisition, in any other document furnished pursuant to this Agreement, or in order to induce the Council to disburse any of the G.O. Grant shall prove to have been untrue or incorrect in any material respect or materially misleading as of the time such representation, covenant, or warranty was made. B. If the'Grantee fails to fully comply with any provision, term, condition, covenant, or warranty contained in this Agreement, the Declaration, or any other document referred to herein. C. If the Grantee fails to fully comply with any provision, term, condition, covenant or warranty contained in the G.O. Compliance Legislation, the Commissioner's Order, or the G.O. Bonding Legislation. D. If the Grantee fails to complete the Project, or cause the Project to be completed, by the Completion Date. E. If the Grantee fails to provide and expend the full amount of the financial responsibilities required under Section 7.23 for the Project. F. If a Declaration is required, if the Grantee fails to record the Declaration and deliver copies thereof as set forth in Section 2.05.V. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any of the above delineated events that cannot be cured shall, unless waived in writing by the Council and the Commissioner of MMB, constitute an Event of Default under this Agreement immediately upon either the Council or the Commissioner of MMB giving the Grantee written notice of such event. Section 2.08 Remedies. Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default and at any time thereafter until such Event of Default is cured to the satisfaction of the Council, the Council or the Commissioner of MMB may enforce any or all of the following remedies. 16 A. The Council may refrain from disbursing the G.O. Grant provided, however, the Council may make such disbursements after the occurrence of an Event of Default without thereby waiving its rights and remedies hereunder. B. If the Event of Default involves a failure to comply with any of the provisions contained herein other then the provisions of Sections 4.01 or 4.02, then either the Council or the Commissioner of MMB, as a third parry beneficiary of this Agreement, may demand that the Outstanding Balance of the G.O. Grant be returned to it, and upon such demand the Grantee shall return such amount to the Council or the Commissioner of MMB. C. If the Event of Default involves a failure to comply with the provisions of Sections 4.01 or 4.02, then either the Council or the Commissioner of MMB, as a third party beneficiary of this Agreement, may demand that the Grantee pay the amounts that would have been paid if there had been full and complete compliance with such provisions, and upon such demand the Grantee shall pay such amount to the Council or the Commissioner of MMB. D. Either the Council or the Commissioner of MMB, as a third party beneficiary of this Agreement, may enforce any additional remedies they may have in law or equity. The rights and remedies herein specified are cumulative and not exclusive of any rights or remedies that the Council or the Commissioner of MMB would otherwise possess. If the Grantee does not repay the amounts required to be paid under this Section or under any other provision contained in this Agreement within 30 days of demand by the Council or the Commissioner of MMB, or any amount ordered by a court of competent jurisdiction within 30 days of entry of judgment against the Grantee and in favor of the Council and /or the Commissioner of MMB, then such amount may, unless precluded by law, be taken from or off -set against any aids or other monies that the Grantee is entitled to receive from the Council or State of Minnesota. In addition, the Council may use the provisions of Minn. Stat. § 473.521, subd. 4 to collect the amounts required to be paid under this Section or under any other provision contained in this Agreement. Section 2.09 Notification of Event of Default. The Grantee shall furnish to the Council and the Commissioner of MMB, as soon as possible and in any event within 7 days after it has obtained knowledge of the occurrence of each Event of Default or each event which with the giving of notice or lapse of time or both would constitute an Event of Default, a statement setting forth details of each Event.of Default or event which with the giving of notice or upon the lapse of time or both would constitute an Event of Default and the action which the Grantee proposes to take with respect thereto. Section 2.10 Survival of Event of Default. This Agreement shall survive any and all Events of Default and remain in full force and effect even upon the payment of 17 any amounts due under this Agreement, and shall only terminate in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 2.12 and at the end of its term in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 2.11. Section 2.11 Term of Grant Agreement. This Agreement shall, unless earlier terminated in accordance with any of the provisions contained herein, remain in full force and effect for the time period starting on the effective date hereof and ending on the date that corresponds to the date established by adding a time period equal to 125% of Useful Life of the Real Property and Facility to the date on which the Real Property and Facility is first used for the operation of the Project after such effective date. If there are no uncured Events of Default as of such date this Agreement shall terminate and no longer be of any force or effect, and the Commissioner of MMB shall execute whatever documents are needed to release the Real Property and Facility from the effect of this Agreement and any Declarations or Certifications, as applicable. Section 2.12 Modification and /or Early Termination of Grant. If the Project is not started on or before the date that is six (6) months from the effective date of this Agreement or all of the G.O. Grant has not been disbursed as of the date that is two (2) years from July 1, 2010, or such other date to which the Grantee and the Council may agree in writing, then the Council's obligation to fund the G.O. Grant shall terminate. In such event, (i) if none of the G.O. Grant has been disbursed by such dates then the Council's obligation to fund any portion of the G.O. Grant shall terminate and this Agreement shall terminate and no longer be of any force or effect, and (ii) if some but not all of the G.O. Grant has been disbursed by such dates then the Council shall have no further obligation to provide any additional funding for the G.O. Grant and this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect but shall be modified and amended to reflect the amount of the G.O. Grant that was actually disbursed as of such date. This provision shall not, in any way, affect the Grantee's obligation to complete the Project by the Completion Date. This Agreement shall also terminate and no longer be of any force or effect upon the Grantee's sale of its ownership interest in the Real Property and Facility in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 4.01 and transmittal of all or a portion of the proceeds of such sale to the Commissioner of MMB in compliance with the provisions contained in Section 4.02, or upon the termination of Grantee's ownership interest in the Real Property and Facility if such ownership interest is by way of an easement. Upon such termination the Commissioner of MMB shall execute, or have executed, and deliver to the Grantee such documents as are required to release the Grantee's ownership interest in the Real Property and Facility, from the effect of this Agreement and the Declaration. Section 2.13 Excess Funds. If the full amount of the G.O. Grant and any matching funds referred to in Section 7.23 are not needed to complete the Project, then, unless language in the G.O. Bonding Legislation indicates otherwise, the G.O. Grant shall be reduced by the amount not needed. Any funds awarded by the Council under this Agreement that have i) not been properly expended for the Project in accordance 18 with Attachments III and IV; ii) were expended by the Grantee but subsequently reimbursed to Grantee or its agents, or iii) constitute a total reimbursement in excess of 50% of the actual eligible spending will be repaid to the Council if paid and the unearned part of the award canceled. Article III. Contents of Article III have been deliberately omitted from this Agreement. Article IV SALE Section 4.01 Sale. The Grantee shall not sell any part of its ownership interest in the Real Property and Facility unless all of the following provisions have been complied with fully. A.: The Grantee determines, by official action, that such ownership interest is no longer usable or needed for the operation of the Governmental Program, which such determination may be based on a determination that the portion of the Real Property or Facility to which such ownership interest applies is no longer suitable or financially feasible for such purpose. B. The sale is made as authorized by law. C. The sale is for Fair Market Value. D. The written consent of the Commissioner of MMB has been obtained. The acquisition of the Grantee's ownership interest in the Real Property and Facility at a foreclosure sale, by acceptance of a deed -in -lieu of foreclosure, or enforcement of a security interest in personal property used ,in the operation thereof, by a lender that has provided monies for the acquisition of the Grantee's ownership interest in or betterment of the Real Property Facility shall not be considered a sale for the purposes of this Agreement if after such acquisition the lender operates such portion of the Real Property and Facility in a manner which is not inconsistent with the requirements imposed under Section 2.04 and the lender uses its best efforts to sell such acquired interest to a third party for Fair Market Value. The lender's ultimate sale or disposition of the acquired interest in the Real Property and Facility shall be deemed to be a sale for the purposes of this Agreement, and the proceeds thereof shall be disbursed in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 4.02. The Grantee may participate in any public auction of its ownership interest in the Real Property and Facility and bid thereon; provided that the Grantee agrees that if it is 19 the successful purchaser it will not use any part of the Real Property or Facility for the Governmental Program. Section 4.02 Proceeds of Sale. Upon the sale of the Grantee's ownership interest in the Real Property and Facility the proceeds thereof after the deduction of all costs directly associated and incurred in conjunction with such sale and such other costs that are approved, in writing, by the Commissioner of MMB, but not including the repayment of any debt associated with the Grantee's ownership interest in the Real Property and Facility, shall be disbursed in the following manner and order. A. The first distribution shall be to the Commissioner of MMB in an amount equal to the Outstanding Balance of the G.O. Grant, and if the amount of such net proceeds shall be less than the amount of the Outstanding Balance of the G.O. Grant then all of such net proceeds shall be distributed to the Commissioner of MMB. B. The remaining portion, after the, distribution specified in Section 4.02A, shall be distributed to (i) pay in full any outstanding Approved Debt, (ii) reimburse the Grantee for its Ownership Value, and (iii) to pay interested public and private entities, other than any such entity that has already received the full amount of its contribution (such as the Council under Section 402.A and the holders of Approved Debt paid under this Section 4.02.B), the amount of money that such entity contributed to the Initial Acquisition and Betterment Costs and the Subsequent Betterment Costs. If such remaining portion is not sufficient to reimburse interested public and private entities for the full amount that such entities contributed to the acquisition or betterment of the Real Property and Facility, then the amount available shall be distributed as such entities may agree in writing and if such entities cannot agree by an appropriately issued court order. C. The remaining portion, after the distributions specified in Sections 4.02.A and B, shall be divided and distributed to the Council, the Grantee, and any other public and private entity that contributed funds to the Initial Acquisition and Betterment Costs and the Subsequent Betterment Costs, other than lenders who supplied any of such funds, in proportion to the contributions that the Council, the Grantee, and such other public and private entities made to the acquisition and betterment of the Real Property and, Facility as such amounts are part of the Ownership Value, Initial Acquisition and Betterment Costs, and Subsequent Betterment Costs. The distribution to the Council shall be made to the Commissioner of MMB, and the Grantee may direct its distribution to be made to any other entity. 20 All amounts to be disbursed under. this Section 4.02 must be consented to, in writing, by the Commissioner of MMB, and no such disbursements shall be made without such consent. The Grantee shall not be required to pay or reimburse the Council or the Commissioner of MMB for any funds above and beyond the full net proceeds of such sale, even if such net proceeds are less than the amount of the Outstanding Balance of the G.O. Grant. Article V. COMPLIANCE WITH G.O. COMPLIANCE LEGISLATION AND THE COMMISSIONER'S ORDER Section 5.01 State Bond Financed Property. The Grantee and the Council acknowledge and agree that the Grantee's ownership interest in the Real Property. and Facility is, or when acquired by the Grantee will be, "state bond financed property ", as such term is used in the G.O. Compliance Legislation and the Commissioner's Order, and, therefore, the provisions contained in'such statute and order apply, or will apply, to the Grantee's ownership interest in the Real Property and Facility. Section 5.02 Preservation of Tax Exempt Status. In order to preserve the tax - exempt status of the State G.O. Bonds, the Grantee agrees as follows: A. It will not use the Real Property or Facility, or use or invest the G.O. Grant or any other sums treated as "bond proceeds" under Section 148 of the Code including "investment proceeds," "invested sinking funds," and "replacement . proceeds," in such a manner as to cause the G.O. Bonds to be classified as "arbitrage bonds" under Section 148 of the Code. B. It will deposit into and hold all of the G.O. Grant that it receives under this Agreement in a segregated non - interest bearing account until such funds are used for payments for the Project in accordance with the provisions contained herein. C. It will, upon written request; provide the Commissioner of MMB all information required to satisfy the informational requirements set forth in the Code including, but not limited to, Sections 103 and 148 thereof, with respect to the G.O. Bonds. D. It will, upon the occurrence of any act or omission by the Grantee that could cause the interest on the State G.O. Bonds to no longer be tax exempt and upon direction from the Commissioner of MMB, take such actions and furnish such documents as the Commissioner of MMB determines to be necessary to ensure that the interest to be paid on the State G.O. Bonds is exempt from federal taxation, which such action may include either: (i) compliance with proceedings intended to classify the State G.O. Bonds as a "qualified bond" within the meaning of Section 21 141(e) of the Code, (ii) changing the nature of the use of the Real Property or Facility so that none of the net proceeds of the State G.-O. Bonds will be used, directly or indirectly, in an "unrelated trade or business" or for any "private business use" (within the meaning of Sections 141(b) and 145(a) of the Code), or (iv) compliance with other Code provisions, regulations, or revenue procedures which amend or supersede the foregoing. E. It will not otherwise use any of the G.O. Grant, including earnings thereon, if any, or take or permit to or cause to be taken any action that would adversely affect the exemption from federal income taxation of the interest on the G.O. Bonds, nor otherwise omit, take, or cause to be taken any action necessary to maintain such tax exempt status, and if it should take, permit, omit to take, or cause to be taken, as appropriate, any such action, it shall take all lawful actions necessary to rescind or correct such actions or omissions promptly. upon having knowledge thereof. Section 5.03 Changes to G.O. Compliance Legislation or the Commissioner's Order. In the event that the G.O. Compliance Legislation or the Commissioner's Order is amended in a manner that reduces any requirement imposed against the Grantee, or if the Grantee's ownership interest in the Real Property or Facility is exempt from the G.O. Compliance Legislation and the Commissioner's Order, then upon written request by the Grantee the Council shall enter into and execute an amendment to this Agreement to implement herein such amendment to or exempt the Grantee's ownership interest in the Real Property and Facility from the G.O. Compliance Legislation or the Commissioner's Order. Article VI. DISBURSEMENT OF GRANT PROCEEDS Section 6.01 The Advances. The Council will make no advances of the G.O. Grant to Grantee. The disbursement of the G.O. Grant shall be in the form of reimbursement for eligible costs as provided ahead in this Article VI. Section 6.02 Draw Requisitions. Whenever the Grantee desires a disbursement of a portion of the G.O. Grant, which shall be no more often than once each calendar quarter, the Grantee shall submit to the Council a Draw Requisition duly executed on behalf of the Grantee or its designee. Each Draw Requisition with respect to construction items shall be limited to amounts equal to: (i) the total value of the classes of the work by percentage of completion as approved by the Grantee and the Council, plus (ii) the value of materials and equipment not incorporated 'in the Project but delivered and suitably stored on or off the Real Property in a manner acceptable to the Council. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, no Draw Requisition for materials stored on or off the Real Property will be made unless the Grantee shall advise the 22 Council, in writing, of its intention to so store materials prior to their delivery and the Council has not objected thereto. At the time of submission of each Draw Requisition, other than the final Draw Requisition, the Grantee shall submit to the Council such supporting evidence as may be requested by the Council to substantiate all payments which are to be made out of the relevant Draw Requisition or to substantiate all payments then made with respect to the Project. At the time of submission of the final Draw Requisition which shall not be submitted before completion of the Project, including all landscape requirements and off - site utilities and streets needed for access to the Real Property and Facility and correction of material defects in workmanship or materials (other than the completion of punch list items) as provided in the Construction Contract Documents, the Grantee shall submit to the Council: (i) such supporting evidence as may be requested by the Council to substantiate all payments which are to be made out of the final Draw Requisition or to substantiate all payments then made with respect to the Project, and (ii) satisfactory evidence that all work requiring inspection by municipal or other governmental authorities having jurisdiction has been duly inspected and approved by such authorities, and that all requisite certificates of occupancy and other approvals have been issued. Section 6.03 Additional Funds. If the Council shall at any time in good faith determine that the sum of the undisbursed amount of the G.O. Grant plus the amount of all other funds committed to the Project is less than the amount required to pay all costs and expenses of any kind which reasonably may be anticipated in connection with the Project, then the Council may send written notice thereof to the Grantee specifying the amount which must be supplied in order to provide sufficient funds to complete the Project. The Grantee agrees that it will, within 10 calendar days of receipt of any such notice, supply or have some other entity supply the amount of funds specified in the Council's notice. Section 6.04 Conditions Precedent to Any Draw. The obligation of the Council to make Draws hereunder (including the initial Advance) shall be subject to the following conditions precedent: A. The Council shall have received a Draw Requisition for such amount of funds being requested, which such amount when added to all prior requests for Draws shall not exceed the amount of the G.O. Grant delineated in Section 1.01. B. For all or any portion of the Governmental Program which qualifies for a waiver of Real Property Declaration granted to either the Council. (Attachment V) or Grantee, the Council shall have either received the duly executed Certification attached to this Agreement as Attachment lA or for all or any portion of the Governmental Program which does not qualify for a Waiver of Real Property Declaration, a copy of duly executed Declaration that has been duly recorded in the appropriate governmental office, with all of the recording information displayed 23 thereon, or evidence that such Declaration will promptly be recorded and delivered to the Council. C. The Council shall have received evidence upon request, and in form and substance acceptable to the Council, that (i) the Grantee has legal authority to and has taken all actions necessary to enter into this Agreement and the Certification or the Declaration, as applicable, and (ii) this Agreement and the Declaration or Certification, as applicable, are binding on and enforceable against the Grantee. D. The Council shall have received evidence upon request, and in form and substance acceptable to the Council, that the Grantee has sufficient funds to fully and completely pay for the Project and all other expenses that may occur in conjunction therewith. E. The Council shall have received evidence upon request, and in form and substance acceptable to the Council, that the Grantee is in compliance with the matching funds requirements, if any, contained in Section 7.23. F. The Council shall have received evidence upon request, and in form and substance acceptable to the Council, showing that the Grantee possesses the ownership interest delineated in Section 2.02. G. The Council shall have received evidence upon request, and in. form and substance acceptable to the Council, that the Real Property and Facility, and the contemplated use thereof are permitted by and will comply with all applicable use or other restrictions and requirements imposed by applicable zoning ordinances or regulations, and, if required by law, have been duly approved by the applicable municipal or governmental authorities having jurisdiction thereover. H. The Council shall have received evidence upon request, and in form and substance acceptable to the Council, that that all applicable and required building permits, other permits, bonds and licenses necessary for the Project have been paid for, issued, and obtained, other than those permits, bonds and licenses which may not lawfully be obtained until a future date or those permits, bonds and licenses which in the ordinary course of business would normally not be obtained until a later date. I. The Council shall have received evidence upon request, and in form and substance acceptable to the Council, that that all applicable and required permits, bonds and licenses necessary for the operation of the Real Property and Facility in the manner specified in Section 2.04 have been paid for, issued, and obtained, other than those permits, bonds and licenses which may not lawfully be obtained until a future date or those permits, bonds and licenses which in the ordinary course of business would normally not be obtained until a later date. ►ZI J. The Council shall have received evidence upon request, and in form and substance acceptable to the Council, that the Project will be completed in a manner that will allow the Real Property and Facility to be operated in the manner specified in Section 2.04. K. The Council shall have received evidence upon request, and in form and substance acceptable to the Council, that the Grantee has the ability and a plan to fund the operation of the Real Property and Facility in the manner specified in Section 2.04. L. The Council shall have received evidence upon request, and in form and substance acceptable to the Council, that the insurance requirements under Section 7.01 have been satisfied. M. CONTENTS HAVE BEEN DELIBERATELY OMITTED FROM THIS AGREEMENT. N. No Event of Default under this Agreement or event. which would constitute an Event of Default but for the requirement that notice be given or that a period of grace or time elapse shall have occurred and be continuing. O. The Council shall have received evidence upon request, and, in form and substance acceptable to the Council, that the Contractor will complete the Construction Items substantially in conformance with the Construction Contract Documents and pay all amounts lawfully owing to all laborers and materialmen who worked on the Construction Items or supplied materials therefore, other than amounts being contested in good faith. Such evidence may be in the form of payment and performance bonds in amounts equal to or greater than the amount of the fixed price or guaranteed maximum price contained in the Construction Contract Documents that name the Council and the Grantee dual obligees thereunder, .or such other evidence as may be acceptable to the Grantee and the Council. P. No determination shall have been made by the Council that the amount of funds committed to the Project is less than the amount required to pay all costs and expenses of any kind that may reasonably be anticipated in connection with the Project, or if such a determination has been made and notice thereof sent to the Grantee under Section 6.03, then the Grantee has supplied, or has caused some other entity to supply, the necessary funds in accordance with such section or has provided evidence acceptable to the Council that sufficient funds are available. Q. The Grantee has supplied to the Council all other items that the Council may reasonably require. Section 6.05 Construction Inspections. The Grantee and the Architect, if any, shall be responsible for making their . own inspections and observations of the 25 Construction Items, and shall determine to their own satisfaction that the work done or materials supplied by the Contractors to whom payment is to be made out of each Advance has been properly done or supplied in accordance with the Construction Contract Documents. Article VII. NUSCELLANEOUS Section 7.01 Insurance. The Grantee shall, upon acquisition of the ownership interest delineated in Section 2.02, insure the Facility, if such exists, in an amount equal to the full insurable value thereof (i) by self insuring under a program of self insurance legally adopted, maintained and adequately funded by the Grantee, or (ii) .by way of builders risk insurance and fire and extended coverage insurance with a deductible in an amount acceptable to the Council under which the Council and the Grantee are named as loss payees. If damages which are covered by such required insurance occur, then the Grantee shall, at its sole option and discretion, either: (y) use or cause the insurance proceeds to be used to fully or partially repair such damage and to provide or cause to be provided whatever additional funds that may be needed to fully or partially repair such damage, or (z) sell its ownership interest in the damaged Facility and portion of the Real Property associated therewith in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 4.01. If the Grantee elects to only partially repair such damage, then the portion of the insurance proceeds not used for such repair shall be applied in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 4.02 as if the Grantee's ownership interest in the Real Property and Facility had been sold, and such amounts shall be credited against the amounts due and owing under Section 4.02 upon the ultimate sale of the Grantee's ownership interest in the Real Property and Facility. If the Grantee elects to sell its ownership interest in the damaged Facility and portion of the Real Property associated therewith, then such sale must occur within a reasonable time period from the date the damage occurred and the cumulative sum of the insurance proceeds plus the proceeds of such sale must be applied in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 4.02, with the insurance proceeds being so applied within a reasonable time period from the date they are received by the Grantee. If the Grantee elects to maintain general comprehensive liability insurance regarding the Real Property and Facility, then the Grantee shall have the Council named as an additional named insured therein. At the written request of either the Council or the Commissioner of MMB, the Grantee shall promptly furnish to the requesting entity all written notices and all paid premium receipts received by the Grantee regarding the required insurance, or certificates of insurance evidencing the existence of such required insurance. If the Grantee fails to provide and maintain the insurance required under this Section, then the Council may, at its sole option and discretion, obtain and maintain KO insurance of an equivalent nature and any funds expended by the Council to obtain or maintain such insurance shall be due and payable on demand by the Council and bear interest from the date of advancement by the Council at a rate equal to the lesser of the maximum interest rate allowed by law or 18% per annum based upon a 365 -day year. Provided, however, nothing contained herein, including but not limited to this Section, shall require the Council to obtain or maintain such insurance, and the Council's decision to not obtain or maintain such insurance shall not lessen the Grantee's duty to obtain and maintain such insurance. Section 7.02 Condemnation. If after the Grantee has acquired the ownership interest delineated in Section 2.02 all or any portion of the Real Property and Facility is condemned to an extent that the Grantee can no longer comply with the provisions contained in Section 2.04, then the Grantee shall, at its sole option and discretion, either: (i) use or cause the condemnation proceeds to be used to acquire an interest in additional real property needed for the Grantee to continue to comply with the provisions contained in Section 2.04 and to fully or partially restore the Facility and to provide or cause to be provided whatever additional funds that may be needed for such purposes, or (ii) sell the remaining portion of its ownership interest in the Real Property and Facility in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 4.01. Any condemnation proceeds which are not used to acquire an interest in additional real property or to restore the Facility shall be applied in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 4.02 as if the Grantee's ownership interest in the Real Property and Facility had been sold, and such amounts shall be credited against the amounts due and owing under Section 4.02 upon the ultimate sale of the Grantee's ownership interest in the remaining Real Property and Facility. If the Grantee elects to sell its ownership interest in the portion of the Real Property and Facility that remains after the condemnation, then such sale must occur within a reasonable time period from the date the condemnation occurred and the cumulative sum of the condemnation proceeds plus the proceeds of such sale must be applied in accordance with the provisions contained in Section 4.02, with the condemnation proceeds being so applied within a reasonable time period from the date they are received by the Grantee. As recipient of any of condemnation awards or proceeds referred to herein, the Council agrees to and will disclaim, assign or pay over to the Grantee all of such condemnation awards or proceeds it receives so that the Grantee can comply with the requirements that this Section imposes upon the Grantee as to the use of such condemnation awards or proceeds. Section 7.03 Use, Maintenance, Repair and Alterations. The Grantee shall (i) keep the Real Property and Facility, in good condition and repair, subject to reasonable and ordinary wear and tear, (ii) complete promptly and in good and workmanlike manner any building or other improvement which may be constructed on the Real Property and promptly restore in like manner any portion of the Facility which may be damaged or destroyed thereon and pay when due all claims for labor performed and materials furnished therefore, (iii) comply with all laws, ordinances, regulations, requirements, covenants, conditions and restrictions now or hereafter affecting the Real 27 Property or Facility, or any part thereof, or requiring any alterations or improvements thereto, (iv) keep and maintain abutting grounds, sidewalks, roads, parking and landscape areas in good and neat order and repair, (v) comply with the provisions of any easement if its ownership interest in the Real Property and Facility is by way of such easement, and (vi) comply with the provisions of any condominium documents and any applicable reciprocal easement or operating agreements if the Real Property and Facility, is part of a condominium regime or is subject to a reciprocal easement or use agreement. The Grantee shall not, without the written consent of the Council and the Commissioner of MMB, (a) permit or suffer the use of any of the Real Property or Facility, for any purpose other than the purposes specified in Section 2.04, (b) remove, demolish or substantially alter any of the Real Property or Facility, except such alterations as may be required by laws, ordinances or regulations or such other alterations as may improve such Real Property or Facility by increasing the value thereof or improving its ability to be used to operate the Governmental Program thereon or therein, (c) do any act or thing which would unduly impair or depreciate the value of the Real Property or Facility, (d) abandon the Real Property or Facility, (e) commit or permit any waste or deterioration of the Real Property or Facility, (f) remove any fixtures or personal property from the Real Property or Facility, that was paid for with the proceeds of the G.O. Grant unless the same are immediately replaced with like property of at least equal value and utility, or (g) commit, suffer or permit any act to be done in or upon the Real Property or Facility, in violation of any law, ordinance or regulation. If the Grantee fails to maintain the Real Property and Facility in accordance with the provisions contained in this Section, then after a notice and a reasonable time to cure the deficiency, the Council may perform whatever acts and expend whatever funds that are necessary to so maintain the Real Property and Facility and the Grantee irrevocably authorizes and empowers the Council to enter upon the Real Property and Facility, to perform such acts as may to necessary to so maintain the Real Property and Facility. Any actions taken or funds expended by the Council hereunder shall be at its sole option and discretion, and nothing contained herein, including but not limited to this Section, shall require the Council to take any action, incur any expense, or expend any funds, and the Council shall not be responsible for or liable to the Grantee or any other entity for any such acts that are undertaken and performed in good faith and not in a negligent manner. Any funds expended by the Council to perform such acts as may to necessary to so maintain the Real Property and Facility shall be due and payable on demand by the Council and bear interest from the date of advancement by the Council at a rate equal to the lesser of the maximum interest rate allowed by law or 18% per annum based upon a 365 day year. Section 7.04 Records Keeping and Reporting. The Grantee shall maintain or cause to be maintained books, records, documents and other evidence pertaining to the costs or expenses associated with the Project and operation of the Real Property and Facility needed to comply with the requirements contained in this Agreement, the G.O. Compliance Legislation, the Commissioner's Order, and the G.O. Bonding Legislation, and upon request shall allow or cause the entity which is maintaining such items to allow 28 the Council, auditors for the Council, the Legislative Auditor for the State of Minnesota, or the State Auditor for the State of Minnesota, to inspect, audit, copy, or abstract, all of such items. The. Grantee shall use or cause the entity which is maintaining such items to use generally accepted accounting principles in the maintenance of such items, and shall retain or cause to be retained (i) all of such items that relate to the Project for a period of 6 years from the date that the Project is fully completed and placed into operation, and (ii) all of such items that relate to the operation of the .Real Property and Facility for a period of 6 years from the date such operation is initiated. Section 7.05 Inspections by Council. Upon reasonable request by the Council and without interfering with the normal use of the Real Property and Facility, the Grantee shall allow the Council to inspect, take and use photos of the Real Property and Facility. Section 7.06 Data Practices. The Grantee agrees with respect to any data that it possesses regarding the G.O. Grant, the Project, or the operation of the Real Property and Facility, to comply with all of the provisions and restrictions contained in the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act contained in Chapter 13 of the Minnesota Statutes that exists as of the date of this Agreement and as such may subsequently be amended, modified or replaced from time to time. Section 7.07 Non - Discrimination. The Grantee agrees to not engage in discriminatory employment practices regarding the Project, or operation or management of the Real Property and Facility, and it shall, with respect to such activities, fully comply with all of the provisions contained in Chapters 363A and 181 of the Minnesota Statutes that exist as of the date of this Agreement and as such may subsequently be amended, modified or replaced from time to time. Section 7.08 Worker's Compensation. The Grantee agrees to comply with all of the provisions relating to worker's compensation contained in Minn. Stat. §§ 176.181 sub.d. 2 and 176.182, as they may be amended, modified or replaced from time to time, with respect to the Project and the operation or management of the Real Property and Facility. Section 7.09 • Antitrust Claims. The Grantee hereby assigns to the Council and the Commissioner of MMB all claims it may have for over charges as to goods or services provided with respect to the Project, and operation or management of the Real Property and Facility that arise under the antitrust laws of the State of Minnesota or of the United States of America. Section 7.10. CONTENTS OF SECTION 7.10 HAVE BEEN DELIBERATELY OMITTED FROM THIS AGREEMENT. Section 7.11 Prevailing Wages. The Grantee agrees to comply with all of the applicable provisions contained in Chapter 177 of the Minnesota Statutes, and specifically those provisions contained in Minn. Stat. §§ 177.41 through 177.435, as they may be amended, modified or replaced from time to time with respect to the Project and 29 the operation of the Governmental Program on or in the Real Property and Facility. By agreeing to this provision, the Grantee is not acknowledging or agreeing that the cited provisions apply to the Project or the operation of the Governmental Program on or in the Real Property and Facility. Section 7.12 Liability. The Grantee and the Council agree that they will, subject to any indemnifications provided herein, be responsible for their own acts and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law, and they shall not be responsible for the acts of the other party and the results thereof. The liability of the Council and the Commissioner of MMB is governed by the provisions contained in Minn. Stat. § 3.736, Minn. Stat. and chapter 466 as it may be amended, modified or replaced from time to time. If the Grantee is a "municipality" as such term is used in chapter 466 of the Minnesota Statutes that exists as of the date of this Agreement and as such may subsequently be amended, modified or replaced from time to time, then the liability of the Grantee, including but not limited to the indemnification provided under Section 7.13, is governed by the provisions contained in such Chapter 466. Section 7.13 Indemnification by the Grantee. The Grantee shall bear all loss, expense (including attorneys' fees), and damage in connection with the Project and operation of the Real Property and Facility, and agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the Council, the Commissioner of MMB, and the State of Minnesota, their agents, servants and employees from all claims, demands and judgments made or recovered against the Council, the Commissioner of MMB, and the State of Minnesota, their agents, servants and employees, because of bodily injuries, including death at any time resulting therefrom, or because of damages to property of the Council, the Commissioner of MMB, or the State of Minnesota, or others (including loss of use) from any cause whatsoever, arising out of, incidental to, or in connection with the Project or operation of the Real Property and Facility, whether or not due to any act of omission or commission, including negligence of the Grantee or any contractor or his or their employees, servants or agents, and whether or not due to any act of omission or commission (excluding, however, negligence or breach of statutory duty) of the Council, the Commissioner of MMB, or the State of Minnesota, their employees, servants or agents. The Grantee further agrees to indemnify, save, and hold the Council, the Commissioner of MMB, and the State of Minnesota, their agents and employees, harmless from all claims arising out of, resulting from, or in any manner attributable to any violation by the Grantee, its officers, employees, or agents, of any provision of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, including legal fees and disbursements paid or incurred to enforce the provisions contained in Section 7.06. The Grantee's liability hereunder shall not be limited to the extent of insurance carried by or provided by the Grantee, or subject to any exclusions from coverage in any insurance policy. Section 7.14 Relationship of the Parties. Nothing contained in this Agreement is intended or should be construed in any manner as creating or establishing the 30 relationship of co- partners or a joint venture between the Grantee, the Council, or the Commissioner of MMB, nor shall the Grantee be considered or deemed to be an agent, representative, or employee of the Council, the Commissioner of MMB, or the State of Minnesota in the performance of this Agreement, the Project, or operation of the Real Property and Facility. The Grantee represents that it has already or will secure or cause to be secured all personnel required for the performance of this Agreement and the Project, and the operation and maintenance of the Real Property and Facility. All personnel of the Grantee or other persons while engaging in the performance of this Agreement, the Project, or the operation and maintenance of the Real Property and Facility shall not have any contractual relationship with the Council, the Commissioner of MMB, or. the State of Minnesota, and shall not be considered employees of any of such entities: In addition, all claims that may arise on behalf of said personnel or other,persons out of employment or alleged employment including, but not limited to, claims under the Workers' Compensation Act of the State of Minnesota, claims of discrimination against the Grantee, its officers, agents, contractors, or employees shall in no way be the responsibility of the Council; the Commissioner of MMB, or the State of Minnesota. Such personnel or other persons shall not require nor be entitled to any compensation, rights or benefits of any kind whatsoever from the Council, the Commissioner of MMB, or the State of Minnesota including, but not limited to; tenure rights, medical and hospital care, sick and vacation leave, disability benefits, severance pay and retirement benefits. Section 7.15 . Notices. In addition to any notice required under applicable law to be given in another mariner, any notices required hereunder must be in writing and shall be sufficient if personally served or sent by prepaid, registered, or certified mail (return receipt requested), to the business address of the party to whom it is directed: Such business address shall be that address specified below or such different address as may. hereafter be specified, by either party by written notice to the other: To the Public Entity Grantee. City of Edina 7450 Metro Blvd Edina, MN 55439 Attention: Wayne D. Houle, Director of Public Works /City Engineer To the State Entity Council at: Metropolitan Council 390 Robert Street North St. Paul, MN 55101 Attention: Regional Administrator 31 To the Commissioner of MMB at: Minnesota Department of Management and Budget 400 Centennial Office Bldg. 658 Cedar Street St. Paul, MN 55155 Attention: Commissioner Section 7.16 Binding Effect and Assignment or Modification. This Agreement and the Declaration shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Grantee and the Council, and their respective successors and assigns. Provided, however, that neither the Grantee nor the Council may assign any of its rights or obligations under this Agreement or the Declaration without the prior written consent of the other party. No change or modification of the terms or provisions of this Agreement or the Declaration shall be binding on either the Grantee or the Council unless such change or modification is in writing and signed by an authorized official of the party against which such change or modification is to be imposed. Section 7.17 Waiver. Neither the failure by the Grantee, the Council, or the Commissioner of MMB, as a third party beneficiary of this Agreement, in any one or more instances to insist upon the complete and total observance or performance of any term or provision hereof, nor the failure of the Grantee, the Council, or the Commissioner of MMB, as a third party beneficiary of this Agreement, to exercise any right, privilege, or remedy conferred hereunder or afforded by law shall be construed as waiving any breach of such term, provision, or the right to exercise such right, privilege, or remedy thereafter. In addition, no delay on the part of the Grantee, the Council, or the Commissioner of MMB, as a third party beneficiary of this Agreement, in exercising any right or remedy hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any right or remedy preclude other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right or remedy. Section 7.18 Entire Agreement. This Agreement, the Declaration or Certification, as applicable, and the documents, if any, referred to and incorporated herein by reference embody the entire agreement between the Grantee and the Council, and there are no other agreements, either oral or written, between the Grantee and the Council on the subject matter hereof. Section 7.19 Choice of Law and Venue. All matters relating to the validity, construction, performance, or enforcement of this Agreement or the Declaration shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. All legal actions initiated with respect to or arising from any provision contained in this Agreement shall be initiated, filed and venued in the State of Minnesota District Court located in the City of St. Paul, County of Ramsey, State of Minnesota. 32 Section 7.20 Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is finally judged by any court to be invalid, then the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect and they shall be interpreted, performed, and enforced as if the invalid provision did not appear herein. Section 7.21 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence with respect to all of the matters contained in this Agreement. Section 7.22 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be an original, but such counterparts shall together constitute one and the same instrument. Section 7.23 Grantee Financial Responsibilities. The Grantee must fulfill its financial responsibilities for the Project as shown on Attachment III to this Agreement. (If there are no matching funds requirements then insert the word "NONE ".) Section 7.24 Source and Use of Funds. The Grantee represents to the Council and the Commissioner of MMB that Attachment III is intended to be and is a source and use of funds statement showing the total cost of the Project and all of the funds that are available for the completion of the Project, and that the information contained in such Attachment III correctly and accurately delineates the following information. A. The total cost of the Project detailing all of the major elements that make up such total cost and how much of such total cost is attributed to each such major element. B. The source of all funds needed to complete the Project broken down among the following categories: (i) State funds including the G.O. Grant, identifying the source and amount of such funds. (ii) Matching funds, identifying the source and amount of such funds. (iii) Other funds supplied by the Grantee, identifying the source and amount of such funds. (iv) Loans; identifying each such loan, the entity providing the loan, the amount of each such loan, the terms and conditions of each such loan, and all collateral pledged for repayment of each such loan. (v) Other funds, identifying the source and amount of such funds. C. Such other financial information that is needed to correctly reflect the total funds available for the completion of the Project, the source of such funds and the expected use of such funds. 33 If any of the funds included under the source of funds have conditions precedent to the release of such funds, then the Grantee must provide to the Council and the Commissioner of MMB a detailed description of such conditions and what is being done to satisfy such conditions. The Grantee shall also supply whatever other information and documentation that the Council or the Commissioner of MMB may request to support or explain any of the information contained in Attachment III. The value of the Grantee's ownership interest in the Real Property and Facility should only be shown in Attachment III if such ownership interest is being acquired and paid for with funds shown in such Attachment III, and for all other circumstances such value should be shown in the definition for Ownership Value in Section 1.01 and not included in such Attachment III. The funds shown in Attachment III and to be supplied for the Project may, subject to any limitations contained in the G.O. Bonding Legislation, be provided by either the Grantee. Section 7.25 Project Completion Schedule. The Grantee represents to the Council and the Commissioner of MMB that Attachment IV correctly and accurately delineates the projected schedule for the completion of the Project. Section 7.26 Third -Party Beneficiary. The Governmental Program will benefit the State of Minnesota and the provisions and requirements contained herein are for the benefit of both the Council and the State of Minnesota. Therefore, the State of Minnesota, by and through its Commissioner of MMB, is and shall be a third -party beneficiary of this Agreement. Section 7.27 Grantee Tasks. Any tasks that this Agreement imposes upon the Grantee may be performed by such other entity as the Grantee may select or designate, provided that the failure of such other entity to perform said tasks shall be deemed to be a failure to perform by the Grantee. Section 7.28 Council and Commissioner Required Acts and Approvals. The Council and the Commissioner of MMB shall not (i) perform any act herein required or authorized by it in an unreasonable manner, (ii) unreasonably refuse to perform any act that it is required to perform hereunder, or (iii) unreasonably refuse to provide or withhold any approval that is required of it herein. Section 7.29 Applicability to Real Property and Facility. This Agreement applies to the Grantee's ownership interest in the Real Property and if a Facility exists to the Facility. The term "if applicable" appearing in conjunction with the term "Facility" is meant to indicate that this Agreement will apply to a Facility if one exists, and if no Facility exists then this Agreement will only apply to the Grantee's ownership interest in the Real Property. kill] Section 7.30 E- Verification. The Grantee agrees and acknowledges that it is aware of Governor's Executive Order 08 -01 regarding e- verification of employment of all newly hired employees to confirm that such employees are legally entitled to work in the United States, and that it will, if and when applicable, fully comply with such order and impose a similar requirement in any Use Agreement to which it is a party. , Section 7.31 Additional Requirements. The Grantee and the Council agree to comply with the following additional requirements. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between the following additional requirements and any other provisions or requirement contained in this Agreement, the following additional requirements contained in this Section shall control. Section 7.32 Termination Due to Lack of Funds. Grantee recognizes that Council's obligation to reimburse Grantee for eligible Project costs is dependent upon Council's receipt of funds from the State of Minnesota appropriated to Council under 2010 Session Laws Chapter 189, Section 1'6, subdivision 3. Should the State of Minnesota terminate such appropriation or should such funds become unavailable to Council for any reason, Council shall, upon written notice to Grantee of termination or unavailability of such funds, have no further obligations for reimbursement or otherwise under this Grant Agreement. In the event of such written notice to Grantee by Council of termination or unavailability of funds, Grantee has no further obligation to complete the Grant Program as required by this Grant Agreement. Section 7.33 Grant Program Remainder Funds. Subsequent to Council approval of the final certifications of project completion submitted by all grant recipients of I/I Municipal Grant Program funds, the Council will determine whether any I/I Municipal Grant Program funds remain available for allocation and distribution to Grantees ( "Remainder Funds "). In the event Remainder Funds are available, the Council may, at its sole discretion, allocate and distribute the Remainder Funds to grantees who have received I/I Municipal Grant Program funds, provided, however, that such distribution, when added to the Grant Funds already received by any I/I Municipal Grant Program grantee shall not exceed fifty percent (50 %) of the eligible expenses for the Project. The Council will make such allocation and distribution of the Remainder Funds in accordance with the Council Guidelines for the 1/I Municipal Grant Program. Alternatively, at its discretion, the Council may roll the Remainder Funds into a subsequent I/I Municipal Grant Program or similar eligible program. I& IN TESTIMONY HEREOF, the Grantee and the Council have executed this General Obligation Bond Proceeds Grant Agreement Construction Grant for the Edina 2010 -2011 Inflow and Infiltration Abatement Project on the day and date indicated immediately below their respective signatures. GRANTEE: a Its: Dated: , And: Its: Dated: COUNCIL: By: Its: Dated: , 36 Attachment I to Grant Agreement State of Minnesota General Obligation Bond Financed DECLARATION The undersigned has the following interest in the real property located in the County of , State of Minnesota that is legally described in Exhibit A attached and all facilities situated thereon (collectively referred to as the "Restricted Property "): (Check the appropriate box.) a fee simple title, a lease, or an easement, and as owner of such fee title, lease or easement, does hereby declare that such interest in the Restricted Property is hereby made subject to the following restrictions and encumbrances: A. The Restricted Property is bond financed property within the meaning of Minn. Stat. § 16A.695 that exists as 'of the effective date of the grant agreement identified in paragraph B below, is subject to the encumbrance created and requirements imposed by such statutory provision, and cannot be sold, mortgaged, encumbered or otherwise disposed of without the approval of the Commissioner of Minnesota Management and Budget, or its successor, which approval must be evidenced by a written statement signed by said commissioner and attached to the deed, mortgage, encumbrance or instrument used to sell or otherwise dispose of the Restricted Property; and B. The Restricted Property is subject to all of the terms, conditions, provisions, and limitations contained in that certain [Insert title of the eg neral obli atg ion rag nt agreement] between and dated (the "G.O. Grant Agreement "). The Restricted Property shall remain subject to this State of Minnesota General Obligation Bond Financed Declaration for as long as the G.O. Grant Agreement is in force and effect; at which time it shall be released therefrom by way of a written release in recordable form signed by both the Commissioner of [Insert the name of the Council that provided the grant] and the Commissioner of Minnesota of Management and Budget, or their successors, and such written release is recorded in the real estate records relating to the Restricted Property. This Declaration may not be terminated, amended, or in any way modified without the specific written consent of the Commissioner of Minnesota of Management and Budget, or its successor. ATTACHMENT (SIGNATURE BLOCK, ACKNOWLEDGMENTS, AND STATEMENT AS TO WHOM IT WAS DRAFTED BY.) ATTACHMENTI Exhibit A to Declaration LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF RESTRICTED PROPERTY EXHIBIT A Attachment I -A State of Minnesota General Obligation Bond Financed CERTIFICATION The undersigned hereby certifies as follows: 0 This Certification is being submitted pursuant to the Waiver of Real Property Declaration granted by Minnesota Management and Budget to Metropolitan Council for Municipal Publicly -Owned Infrastructure Inflow/Infiltration projects or the portions thereof which lie entirely within public road, street and highway rights -of -way and utility easements. Edina certifies that Edina has read and will comply with the terms and conditions of the Waiver of Real Property Declaration, a copy of which is attached to this Certification and further, that the Governmental Program which is the subject of and described in the Municipal Publicly -Owned Infrastructure Inflow /Infiltration Grant Agreement No SG2011 -002 between Edina and Metropolitan Council qualifies for the Waiver of Real Property Declaration attached hereto. The Waiver to Metropolitan Council is Attachment V to the Grant Agreement.] The undersigned owns ❑ fee title to property and/or ❑ permanent easement and/or ❑other easement which meets the requirements of this Agreement for wastewater collection purposes and a wastewater collection system within the fee title, permanent easement, and /or the other easement and wastewater collection system being located in Hennepin County, Minnesota. The fee title property, permanent easement and/or other easement and the wastewater collection system therein is referred to as "Restricted Property" and is described in Exhibit A attached hereto by legal description, narrative description or diagram. As the owner of the Restricted Property, the undersigned hereby acknowledges the following restrictions and encumbrances with respect to the Restricted Property: A. The Restricted Property is State bond financed property within the meaning of Minn. Stat. § 16A.695 that exists as of the effective date of the grant agreement identified in paragraph B below, is subject to the encumbrance created and requirements imposed by such statutory provision, and cannot be sold, mortgaged, encumbered or otherwise disposed of without the approval of the Commissioner of Minnesota Management and Budget, or its successor, which approval must be evidenced by a written statement signed by said commissioner and attached to the deed, mortgage, encumbrance or instrument used to sell or otherwise dispose of the Restricted Property; and ATTACHMENT 1- A B. The Restricted Property is subject to all of the terms, conditions, provisions, and limitations contained in that certain Edina 2010 -2011 Inflow and Infiltration Abatement Project between Metropolitan Council and Edina, dated (the "G.O. Grant Agreement "). The Restricted Property shall remain subject to this State of Minnesota General Obligation Bond Financed Declaration for as long as the G.O. Grant Agreement is in force and effect; at which time it shall be released therefrom by way of a written release in recordable form signed by both the Metropolitan Council and the Commissioner of Minnesota of Management and Budget, or their successors, and such written release is recorded in the real estate records relating to the Restricted Property. This Certification may not be terminated, amended, or in any way modified without the specific written consent of the Commissioner of Minnesota of Management and Budget, or its successor. SIGNATURE BLOCK AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF On the ss. day of al Title: Dated: [Grantee] 2011, before me a notary public within and for said County, personally appeared , named in the forgoing instrument as the of and acknowledged said instrument was signed on behalf of said Notary Public ATTACHMENT 1- A Exhibit A to Certification DESCRIPTION OF RESTRICTED PROPERTY EXHIBIT A Attachment II to Grant Agreement LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF REAL PROPERTY (For Projects for which a Certification is being submitted, use the description attached to the Certification submitted.) ATTACHMENT 11 Attachment III to Grant Agreement SOURCE AND USE OF FUNDS FOR THE PROJECT Grantee's Financial Responsibility Item:. Cost, $s: Grantee's.;Res.ponsbility Amount Eligible For Amount Eli gible For -to Pay, in $s:. Reimbursement with Reimbursement with_ Grant Fund; m $s Grant Fund, ;in Note that if a project's final eligible capital expenses are: 1) more than the Final Reimbursement Allocation percentage as determined by th( Council, no additional grant funds will be awarded, except as may be provided under section 7.33, and 2) less than the Final Reimbursement Allocation percentage as determined by the Council, the percentage will not be increased so the amount eligible for reimbursement will effectively be reduced. ATTACHMENT III .. .... .. ... . .. ... . .. .... .............. . ............. ..... ... ........ ......... .. .......... ........ . .......... ....... � Source .9 :un.. .. ...... .. ... '-6f Funds .. ... . ... ... . . .... - Identify Source of Funds---- Amount — - ------ State G.O. Funds G.O. Grant Other State Funds . ..... . .... ..... Sub-Total and Other Items Paid for G.O. Grant Funds ...... . . ..... -with Purchase of Ownership Interest Other Items of a Capital Matching Funds . . . . . . . ..... . ................ . .. . . ........ Sub Total Other Grantee Funds — ----- . ...... . ....... . ..... . . ....... ....... . ..... Sub-Total . ..... Loans ...... ...... Sub-Total Other Funds . . ....................... . . .. ..... Sub-Total ......... . .. . Prepaid Project Expenses ... . .. . . ................ .. . ...... . ....... . ai_ — S ub-Tot . . . ...... . ...... . . .......... TOTAL DS .. .... . ....... $ $ .. ... . . .. ....... ._ .... ............ . . ... ... . .... . ......... . ... . ............ . ...... . ......... - - - ----- - ----- .. ............ . .................... . ...... . . ........... . $ . ....... ... . ..... Identify Items Amount Ownership Acquisition and Other Items Paid for G.O. Grant Funds -with Purchase of Ownership Interest Other Items of a Capital Nature Sub Total -Items Paid for with Non- G.O. Grant Funds .. .... . ....... $ Sub Total . . ......... . .......... ... ......... . . . .. ..... ... .............. . . .... . ... . ...... . ......... TOTAL COSTS $--- ._ .... ............ . . ... ... . .... . ......... . ...... . ......... - - - ----- - ----- ATTACHMENT III Attachment IV to Grant Agreement PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND PROJECT COMPLETION SCHEDULE ATTACHMENT IV A. o e 2010 MCES Infiltration and Inflow � y Grant Application ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA 2010 MCES Infiltration and Inflow Grant Application DECEMBER 14, 2010 Improvements: The City of Edina (City) has completed and will perform work in accordance to the Municipal Publicly Owned Infrastructure 1/1 Grant guidelines. The requested grant will fund cured in place pipe projects, sump drain installation projects, manhole cover replacement project, sanitary sewer manhole repair projects, and sanitary sewer spot repairs. City of Edina Sanitary Sewer „ is — Project Areas W E — CIPP Lining Areas a &ate e; p„ Figure 1. Project Area Map 2010 MCES Infiltration and Inflow Grant Application DECEMBER 14, 2010 Wocation: The project will include many different areas throughout the City (see Figure 1). The highlighted areas indicate where a larger portion of the work is to be done. Sanitary sewer manhole cover replacement and sanitary sewer manhole rehabilitation will be spread throughout the City. Benefits: These projects will help to eliminate inflow and infiltration (I & 1) from entering the. sanitary sewer system and will reduce future infrastructure expansion projects for MCES. Justification: As part of the I &I mitigation program, MCES gave cities 50% credit for performing CIPP lining projects and the City believes this should be applied to the grant program. Other processes such as joint sealing and sanitary sewer replacement are allowed and it is our understanding they will be applied to the grant program. The City has found CIPP lining as a cost effective solution to either of these techniques and all three reduce the amount of I &I from entering the system. The City has identified approximately 6,000 LF of sanitary sewer pipe located in areas where I &I could be significant and VVhere roots have been identified in past cleaning projects. We are currently unable to fully justify the condition of the entire pipe due to our closed circuit televising equipment being out of operation for the last two months. Attached are televising reports from a few sections of pipe which were televised prior to the equipment breaking down. Roots are present almost at every 3' joint (see attached televising reports). The City believes this is representative for the remaining sections of pipe as well. Furthermore these pipes are located in areas where there is high potential of I &I from groundwater. Barr Engineering created a metro wide ground water model for the Metropolitan Council. This model estimates the elevation of the groundwater based on surface water elevations, water levels from Hennepin County well index, and historic Nine Mile Creek Watershed District monitoring wells. As part of the City's ongoing I &I program, the City hired Barr Engineering to compare this model to the depth of the sanitary sewer. This will help the City focus resources to areas which have a higher potential of ongoing I &I. All four areas which are identified as areas for CIPP lining projects (see Figure 1) indicate the sanitary sewer is approximately 10 -20' below the existing groundwater (see appendix). Therefore, based on having roots every three feet and with the presence of groundwater, the City feels this would be effective use of the funds. The City will provide MCES documentation as to the condition of the pipe prior to having a signed grant agreement on January 1, 2011. The City started a sanitary sewer manhole inspection in 2007, and has inspected over 5,000 structures throughout the city. With these inspections we indicated if I &I was present and to what severity. We have attached those inspections as part of the submittal. Cost: The estimated eligible cost is $239,845 (see attached for breakdown). The majority of the work will be performed by contractors through a competitive bid process. The only exception will be the replacement of the sanitary sewer lids. This work will be completed by city employees. 2010 Summary Pamela Park Neighborhood Project (after July 1, 2009) I NITfR, CE,,,' TOTAL 6" PVC SDR 35 SUMP DRAIN PIPE LF 3,130 $7.15 $22,379.50 Connect 6" HDPE SDR 11 S�kMp Drain Pipe Jo Storm Sewer CB/MH EACH 4 $153.00 $612.00 _ot - 35)'1,0 12, $2,200.00 Viewer ty, ewet:Sp PVC 22 $100.06 2010 Sanitary Sewer Cover Replacement Self Sealing Lid (after July 1) EACH 100 $150.00 $15,000.00 Parkwood Knolls Neighborhood Project CASTING ASSEMBLY (R-1733) - self sealing lid —N0"HZV--C'P'-i'S'*-A'-'-- EACH 5 $585 00 $2,925.00 F51 E-. giEM. VA AND REPLAC&SAN LIN ;FT 43 -60 $30.( -:$22,290. 00 ITARY'S"EW $17&00.�: $35600 6-INCH PVC SUMP DRAIN PIPE (5136 I L N . 5 -'00�- . ':$13;000.00 . CUT 6" PVC SDR 35 SUMP DRAIN CLEANOUT (CAP & MARKER) LIN FT EACH 360 $7. 00 $2.1 00.00' 2 $137.00 $274.00 Braemar Hills Neighborhood Project CASTING ASSEMBLY (R-1733) - self sealing lid -' PIPE EACH 5 $415.00 $2,075.00 - _ , I-L ; N RFo P '00, 192:00: 690000IP . �$IA-580:00 6 -INCH LIN FT 390 $30.00 $11,700.00 6" PVC SDR 35 SUMP DRAIN CLEANOUT (CAP & MARKER) EACH 2 $125.00 $250.00 50% eligible 100% eligible Total Work Completed = $112,642 100% Eligible Work Done = $20,000 10% of eligible work category $3,732 of eligible Work category $27,663 Total Eligible Work Completed in 2010 = $51,395 2011 Summary NI. SI MIM�IOW' ... , 2 r° M-: NIMMV l �? ITEM DES RIf?�TIDN'� Y �r r I�JNITPR4 CEO T OTAL C ' OST Sanitary Sewer Lining Project ° PIPE�L• INER' fOR '1'5- 1NL�VCP- SA�IITARY.SEINER . � LF'� � � 6,000 - ... $34.00. . . $204,000.00 Sanitary Sewer MH Project - - CementMH hrnng OF '200 $115,;00 $23,000.00 Reconstruct Sanitary Sewer IVIH = LF 200 $300.00 $60,000.00 2011 Sanitary Sewer Cover Replacement Self Sealing Lid EACH 200 $150.00 $30,000.00 2011 Sump Drain Installation 16" PVC SDR 35 SUMP DRAIN PIPE LF 6,500 $23.00 $149,500.00 i u io cuyiu,e 50% eligible Total Work Completed = $466,500.00 100% Eligible Work Done = $30,000.00 10% of eligible work category $14,950.00 50% of eligible work'category_' $143,500.00 Total Eligible Work Completed in 2011 = $188,450.00 MINNESOTA Management. !P&Budget September 27, 2010 VIA E-MAIL Jason.Willett MCES Finance Director Metropolitan Council 390 Robert St N St. Paul, MN 55101 Re: Waiver of Real Property Declaiation — Metropolitan Cities Inflow and Infiltration Grants Dear Mr. Willett: I have reviewed your letter dated September 24, 2010 requesting a waiver pursuant to.Section 7.02(b) of the Third Order Amending Order of Commissioner of Finance dated August 26, 2010 (the "Commissioner's Order ") of the requirement that a real property declaration be recorded in connection with grants to metropolitan -area cities to address Inflow and Infiltration into local sanitary sewer collection systems. I waive the requirement that a declaration be recorded for the portion of such projects which lies entirely within public road, street and highway rights -0f - -way and utility easements. However, a declaration will need to be . exemted and recorded for any portion of a project which is on land outside of such areas. -Please note that this letter only waives the requirement that a declaration be recorded. The property.will remain bond - financed property and subject to all the other requirements of Minn. Stat. Sec. 16A.695 and the Commissioner's Order_. This waiver is conditional upon our receiving a signed copy of the bond - financed property Certification (substantially in the form attached to the sample grant agreemmi attached to your letter) from each grantee who receives a grant from this program, of which such grantee acknowledges that the project property Is bond - financed property and thus is subject to all the other requirements of Minn. Stat. See. 16A.695 and the Commissioner's Order. Each signed Certification should be seat to Gay Greiter, Capital Budget Coordinator at Minnesota Management & Budget, at the address below. Sincerely, Tom J. Hanson Commissioner Cc: Kathy Kardell, MM Angie Weidell- LeBathe, UM Gay Greiter, MMB Patricia Nauman, Metro Cidles William Moore, MCES/Metropolitan Council Wes Kootshu, Metropolitan CouncUt Jeanne Matross, Metropolitan Council 400 Ccnl=ial Building • 658 CalxSmw - S.. Paut Mian sow SSI SS - Voice: (651)201. 500!1 -Fax: (6511296.8685 -rrY: 1-800 627.3529 M Equal Opportunity Employer ATTACHMENT V Fall 2010 AMLAC Medicine for the Luke Inside: Lake Maps 2 Weed Treatment 2 Minnesota Waters 3 2011 ArtShantys 3 Survey Results 4 Water Retention Ponds 5 Donation Form 6 AMLAC's Work 7 What a Treasure 7 TMDL Explained 8 SSDr Reconstruction 8 Wildlife on the Lake 9 De-icer Use 9 Windy Picnic 10 ML RA IAVr K Prevent zebra Mussels in Medicine Lake Is a zebra mussel invasion of Medicine Lake inevitable? We hope not, but hope isn't enough: the best protection is an educated public who cares. Follow these guidelines to pre- vent their arrival: • If your boat or equipment (water sports or fishing equip- ment) has been in contami- nated waters, leave everything to dry in the sun for at least five days before entering Medi- cine Lake. Zebra mussels live longer in cool shaded areas. • Far from the watershed, inspect and remove aquatic plants, animals, and mud from boat, motor, and trailer. On smooth surfaces, zebra mussel larvae feel like fine sandpaper. • Zebra mussels hitchhike by attaching to aquatic plants. Far from the watershed, drain water that may be in a boat, motor, livewell, bilge, and bait containers, etc. • Far from the watershed, dispose of unwanted live bait (minnows, leeches, and worms) in a trash container. • Far from the watershed, rinse boat and equipment with hot water (106T). • Never introduce fish, plants, crayfish, snails, or clams from one body of water to another. Zebra mussels can grow up to two inches long. They grow together in clusters attaching to one another and are found in shallow (6 -30 feet), algae -rich water. Zebra mussels are the only freshwater mollusks that can firmly attach to solid ob- jects: submerged rocks, dock pilings, or boat hulls. Medicine Lake does not contain many natural hard surfaces; most hard surfaces are manmade. Juveniles are about the size of peppercorns. Again, larvae feel like sandpaper. Lake resident Scott Bur - glechner has first hand experi- ence with zebra mussels. Fol- lowing are his observations. "Zebra mussels reproduce like rabbits and are tough, clingy, and sharp, like razors. "I began hearing stories of zebra mussels in the canal sys- tems of western New York. My recollection is that zebra mussels were first detected in Cayuga Lake in 1993 or 1994. The lake was fully infested with them by 1995. This is a lake that stretches 38 miles. "I have been returning to Ithaca and Cayuga Lake to visit my in -laws nearly every year. Here is what infestation looks Zebra mussels attached to a rock like: clumps of tiny razor sharp shells attached to any hard surface — rocks, docks, pipes, boats —and my perception is that the shallower the water, the greater the infestation. "Cayuga Lake has several inva- sive species including Eurasian water milfoil and sea lampreys. Most users of the lake agree that zebra mussels are the most troublesome. "Within a year every boat in the lake had to be on a lift. They really clog intake lines on boats and irrigation systems. "We had to start wearing shoes in the lake to prevent our feet from being cut. "I have seen people dive from docks, brush the bottom of the lake, and come up with deep cuts from the zebra mussels. "I have heard of divers who no longer find fun treasures be- cause everything is thickly coated with zebra mussels. "I have observed that the water appears clearer than it used to, allowing weeds to grow thicker and removing food from the ecosystem for young fish. "I am scared about what these animals could do to Medicine Lake. It is much smaller and shallower than Cayuga Lake. I believe serious impacts to the natural and recreational uses of our lake are one boat away." For more information, contact Toinav' - __" f. Y` S1?0 // ,0 Page 2 2009 Curlyleaf Treatment AMLAC News FALL 2010 2010 Curleaf Treatment Area 29.1 Acres Weeds Treated This Summer by Steve McComas, Blue Water Science The Medicine Lake sediment survey can help with delineat- ing areas of curlyleaf pond - weed to treat in Medicine Lake. In 2009 and in 2010, areas that were treated were correlated with lake areas that appeared to be conducive to growth based on sediment characteristics. For the most part, curlyleaf treatments continue to keep areas of heavy growth of curly - leaf to a minimum. The sediment survey also indi- cated that where milfoil would grow, the growth would be expected to be low to moder- ate. After a big Eurasian water milfoil growing season in 2009 (which now appears to be a blip rather than a trend), the question was what might hap- pen in 2010. The sediment survey indicated that EWM growth should be mostly low to moderate in Medicine Lake. In 2010, EWM growth was low to moderate. In 2011, EWM will be around, maybe more common than in 2010, but not as abundant as 2009. Treating the invasive .species curlyleafpondrveed trends downward once again. The map above shows that 62 acres were treated in 2009. The map at left shows just over 29.1 acres needed treatment thisyear. FALL 2010 AMLAC News Minnesota Waters Helps Strengthen AIS Law This year, the Aquatic Invasive Species Committee of Minne- sota Waters was able to work with state government to change the law regarding trans- portation of water from lake to lake. The old version of the law specified that water could not be carried from an infected lake. This was not functional, because many times a lake could be infected but not yet discovered as such. Also con- servation officers could not determine what lake a boat came from once it was on the open road, making enforce- ment very difficult. The law now reads that no water can be carried, reducing accidental spread of zebra mussels, spiny waterflea, rusty crayfish and other exotic non - natives. AMLAC is a member of Min- nesota Waters, a non -profit citizen -led organization that has a mission of protecting lakes and rivers in Minnesota. It is basically a state organiza- tion of lake associations. Some activities include chang- ing state policies to protect our waters, holding forums to bring citizens, scientists, and legislators together to work better together toward protect- ing water, educating citizens to monitor waters in the state, helping citizens form new as- sociations and teaching them how to work with government, and other supportive work. Some of this includes working Page 3 with not only the legislature, but DNR, MPCA, and others. Minnesota Waters welcomes both lake associations and indi- viduals to become members. Membership is a way to sup- port its work and to keep citi- zens informed. Newsletters, alerts, and other information will help us all be connected to the effort of doing our part to save the waters. Find more about the organiza- tion at minnesotawaters.org ArtShan ty Projects Takes Break In 2011 After seven successful and very fun years on Medicine Lake ice, the Art Shanty Projects (ASP) has postponed its exhibits until 2012. If you've seen the shanties over the years, you know that ASP has continually expanded, both in audience growth and artist interest. Now, they find that coordinating the project with limited staff and board capacity no longer works. The 2011 break provides the group time to implement a strategic plan for healthy growth. See www.aAshantyprojects.org for more about ASP, see what you can do to help this group along, and look at the photos to bring back some shivery memories: Did you trudge across the ice to see these whimsical and sometimes -silly interpretations of the classic ice - fishing house? Perhaps you had your photo taken in front of a Hawaiian poster at the "StayCation" shanty shaped like a suitcase? Or traded a piece of art for another s at the ArtSwap shanty? Or admired the hundreds of knick- knacks glued to the art car, or watched the ice - bicycle races ... or joined in any one of the many fun activities at this unique event that celebrates winter! The StayCation shanty (above) invited visitors to bask in a tropical paradise amid the ice and snow. Knick- knacks find afresh di, play we on the art car (rigbt). Page 4 AMLAC News Fall 2010 Survey Shows We Use and Care About the Lake How important is the lake to you? 40 35 30 .. .... ... _ - ---- __....__.._...._.. ..... .............---.................... ............- _.._.._..........- ..._.......t............. 25 20 15 10 5 0 .....- .....................-- ...... ................................................ .....-....................... 1 not 2 a little 31 feel 4 quite 5 very important important neutral important important Rate your major concerns about the lake. (Note: first bar in each group is lake level, second is weeds, third is clarity.) How often do you use the lake? Thirty-nine people responded to the survey sent out from AM- LAC last fall. One thing is certain: most respondents care a great deal about this lake and are happy that AML.AC is working to improve it. Not only do people use the lake a lot, but they are using the parks and trails around the lake as well. People bike, swim, boat, fish, watch wildlife, skate, cross country ski, walk, picnic, and enjoy a hundred or so other activities in and around this wonderful natural resource —most weekly, some 100 times or more a year. Wow! Look for a full report of the survey on AMLAC's website: www.amiac.org. How important is AMLAC's work to you? 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1 not 2 a litte 3: feel 4 quite 5 very important 'mpnrtant neutral important impor *ant FALL 2010 AMLAC News Page 5 AML A C Efforts Make Water Quality Ponds Reality by Ginny Black, Plymouth City Council Member AMLAC worked for years to get the attention and support of decision makers to do the water quality work for the lake that had been recommended going back to the 1970s. They were showing up at city council meetings trying to educate the Plymouth City Council about the severity of the pollutants coming into the lake. In 1996 they looked for a new way to get that attention. Erica Urban was the president then and she had an idea for a book that could be presented to the city. Four AMLAC members went out on the lake and measured sedimentation fans, and looked for algae blooms and other problems at the 44 stormwater entrance sites that come off the roads and developed terrain around the lake. The front picture on the photo - journal they created had a picture of an algae bloom that covered the entire lake. This book was given to the Plymouth City Council, the Environmental Quality Com- mittee (EQC), and Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission ( BCWMC). It became an EQC teaching tool. In 2000 Barr Engineering did another study of the lake that cost about $100,000. Shortly afterward, the City, through its EQC, formed the Medicine Lake Committee to decide on a plan to clean up the lake. Three AMLAC members served on this committee and a subsequent one to strengthen the plan. In 2002 BCWMC began its second generation plan to focus on phosphorus discharges from Creek. Two AMLAC members served on the Technical Advisory Com- mittee for this effort. This committee decided that sediment and the phosphorus associated with that sediment entering the lake via Plymouth Creek was the largest single discharge of phosphorus into the lake and the number one threat. The citizen committee recommended the construction of stormwater ponds to treat the water from Plymouth Creek before it entered Medicine Lake. Construction costs for that project were esti- mated to be approximately $1,000,000. The Medicine Lake Report by Bassett Creek also identified this and recommended two alum treatment plants on Plymouth Creek at a cost of over $4,000,000 to build and $250,000 per year to maintain and operate. This remedy addressed only phosphorus and was much more expensive. Besides being quite lovey, water quality ponds on Medicine Lake serve the very ureful purpose of filtering stormwater runoff, keeping both phosphorus and sediment from entering the lake. In 2000, Barr Engineering estimated that 315 tons of sediment was entering the lake eachyear at the Plymouth Crrek site alone. Meanwhile, BCWMC was developing its second generation watershed management plan. Significant efforts were made to get the BCWMC to adopt the Medi- cine Lake plan developed by the City of Plymouth citizen committee. An AMLAC board member attended all of the committee meetings. In addition, I was one of the pre- senters to BCWMC of the Ply- mouth plan. Just a few days before the decision was to be made, the AMLAC representa- tive contacted the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency and got its help. The commission immediately adopted Ply- mouth's plan. The commission also put into place a funding mechanism for water quality work, and it is this fund that paid for building the west re- tention ponds. Last year, the MPCA conducted a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) study of the lake. Four AMLAC mem- bers served on this task force. The exciting thing was that this work did modeling for the water quality goal set for the lake, which is 38 micrograms of phosphorus per liter of water, the same goal AMLAC had set all those years before. It also drew the same conclusions about the water quality ponds that AMLAC had fought for. We can all be proud of the City of Plymouth because their plan had already implemented most of the projects that were recom- mended by the TMDL Task Force. A TMDL plan is 10 -year plan to implement the recommen- dations. Medicine Lake is 10 years ahead! In addition, AMLAC helped the city pass the mechanism for funding many of those projects. In every way, AMLAC moved the work for the lake forward. Page 6 AMLAC News FALL 2010 Support AMLAC's Work with Your Donation Today As we all know and have heard, "things are a little tough out there" right now. Although donations are down from years past, it was wonderful to see long -time supporters and some new supporters who were able to donate this year. You may not realize it, but your donations of money (no matter how much) and time (no matter how many hours) go a long way. Cash donations are used in a variety of different ways, from hot coffee for lake cleanup volunteers, education, speakers, and root beer floats, to newsletters and the website that informs you of AMLAC's accomplishments and concerns. Thanks to everyone who supports AMLAC with donations and volunteering! By becoming a supporter, you help AMLAC in its efforts to keep Medicine Lake a vibrant resource for fish, fowl, and families right here in the cities of Plymouth and Medicine Lake. You also receive this yearly newsletter that explains how your money is spent. ❑ Green Level $25 ❑ Platinum Level $75 ❑ Gold Level $50 ❑ Onyx Level $100 A donation above the suggested amount if you think you can afford one. $ + donation of $20 or $ = TOTAL enclosed $ Number of people per household Family name /s Names of individuals in household Printing and postage are expensive, so we plan to email newsletters whenever possible. The advantage of your emailed newsletter is that pictures are in color. Check here if you'd rather receive an electronic copy only G. We appreciate your helping AMLAC save cost by sharing your email address with us. (Your data will not be passed on to other organizations!) Email Email Email Email Address City, State, and ZIP Telephone FAF out and return to Karen Berge, Treasurer, 10030 South Shore Drive, Plymouth MN 55441 Thank you for joiningAMLAC! FALL 2010 AMLAC News Page 7 What a Treasure by Bill Wixon, AMLAC board member What a treasure we have In Medicine Lake, It is so soothing, I'm lost in its wake. To fish, to ski, To swim, to hike, To sail, to picnic, To run, to bike. Eagles fly by, Majestic in flight. Can you believe, They soar at such height? People move in People move out. The folks who stay, Know what it's about. Our lake is so special, As critters there know, It is their home, And care we must show Be protective! Praise God's creation! Medicine Lake's your jewel Worthy of celebrationl AMLAC is vigilant, Doing its best, Spending its time, Protecting your nest. Preserving the balance, The waters moving. Working with experts, Water quality's improving, Now it's time! Have a heart! Donate this year! Do your part! Where Your Donation Goes AMLAC is a voluntary group of citizens that works with government agencies on lake preservation, weed control, education about lake health, and building community awareness. The work that AMLAC does each year is en- tirely funded by the generous support donations of the peo- ple (like you!) who use and enjoy the lake. Please support AMLAC this year so that the efforts can continue. AMLAC has been working for Medicine Lake area citizens since 1974. Much of its work has been to bring the needs of the lake to the attention of state and local governments. Detailed information is on the website at www.amlac.org; below is a brief recap of recent activities on your behalf: • Commissioned a study of lake sediments to determine growing conditions for Eurasian water milfoil (EWM) and curlyleaf pond - weed (CLP). The study con- cluded that EWM should not be a major problem in the lake long term due to limited nitrogen, but that CLP could be problematic again if not controlled. • Brought together the DNR, the City of Medicine Lake, the City of Plymouth, and Three Rivers Parks District to form a new five -year Lake Vegetation Management Plan (LVMP) so that we could continue to treat aquatic in- vasive species in the lake. The plan Plymouth imple- mented in 2002 had expired, and the City of Plymouth was against any chemical treatment of EWM. With the help of Brittany Hummel at the DNR, AMLAC got a variance for treating up to 25% of the littoral zone (the area closest to the shore where the weeds grow). • Participated in the process that developed the long -term plan for CLP control. As a result, 29 acres were treated this spring. Since implemen- tation of the plan, CLP has declined in acreage every year! In addition, the DNR will be assessing EWM in the lake and if treatment is needed, AMLAC can apply for funding from the state. AMLAC will keep on top of this with the new LVMP. In 2009, we could not get a permit for treatment, even though we had funding, be- cause the Plymouth LVMP had expired. • Completed our work with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency on getting a water quality study, called a Total Maximum Daily Load (I'MDL) study, of the lake. Visit www.amlac.org; click Reports, then Impaired Wa- ters Study to learn more. • Worked cooperatively with Minnesota Waters on legisla- tion to prevent the spread of aquatic invasive species. The success is that it is now illegal to carry any water on boats from lake to lake. This is one of the major ways zebra mus- sels are spread. (You too can become a member of Minne- sota Waters. This group is doing great work on behalf of all lakes in MNl Learn more at www.minnesotawaters.org) • Published annual newsletter detailing activities on your behalf. (See www.amlac.org. Click Newsletters, then Fall 2009 PDF) • Attended educational oppor- tunities, City Council meet- ings, and met with local and state government officials to protect the lake and political actions affecting the lake. Your generosity will ensure that Medicine Lake is well Eurasian mater milfoil covers large parts of the lake in someyears. I astyearAMLAC could notget the required permit to treat the mgfod because the DNR now requires Lake Vegetation Management Plan (LUMP) fmm all lakes before ap provin g any such treatment. So A UL AC brought together the cities of Plymouth and Medicine Lake and Three Rivers Parks District with the DNR All cooperated on a plan. In 2010, there was not much milfod However, we are now ready to treat it when the need arises. Page 8 AMLAC News FALL 2010 TMDL Plan to Reduce Phosphorus Will Improve Water Clarity and Reduce Algal Blooms Do you ever feel powerless when hearing about sources of pollution in our beloved lake? "I'm only one person. What can I do about dirty stormwa- ter coming into the lake, or the way the watershed drains ?" But you can do something: support the work that AMLAC does to improve water quality. AMLAC is a group of citizens who volunteer their time and efforts to work with govern- mental entities on improving and preserving the health of Medicine Lake. The volunteers change over time, but the mis- sion of AMLAC is constant over the long term. This past year, people on the AMLAC board worked with cities in the watershed area, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), Bassett Creek Watershed Management Com- mission ( BCWMC), and Three Rivers Park District to plan best management practices for the lake, including a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) study. TMDL studies are plans to restore lakes that are listed by the state as impaired, as Medicine Lake is. Why TMDL? Medicine Lake and most of its watershed are located within the city limits of Plymouth and is surrounded by a mix of pri- vate lakeshore lots and park- land. The lake has a surface area of 902 acres, a maximum ......... __._..... _.__. _ ..._...._ ___. _._.__.... South Shore Drive Reconstruction Citizens Unite to Nix Curb and Gutter depth of 49 feet, and an esti- mated mean depth of 17.5 feet. In addition to Plymouth, the City of Medicine Lake and portions of Golden Valley, New Hope, and Minnetonka constitute the remaining water- shed area. The Medicine Lake watershed is essentially fully developed and has a total area of 11,613 acres (including lake surface area). Runoff from the watershed enters the lake from creeks, storm sewer outfalls, and culverts at various points along the lakeshore. Storm water from almost 86 percent of the Medicine Lake water- shed currently drains through some form of wet detention before it enters Medicine Lake. Citizen involvement can influence government decisions. In this case, citizen involvement protected Medicine Lake from untreated stormwater as well as reducing residents' assessments costs. With the help of AMLAC members and other Plymouth residents, South Shore Drive near the lake was re- constructed with minimum curb and gutter. Early in the decision process of South Shore Drive road reconstruction, AMLAC board member Kevin Christian began a dialog with the City of Plymouth about plans to add curb and gutter where previously there was none. Originally, engineers were planning to put in curb and gutters on the road in order to "protect the edge of the road from deterioration." City engineers also said that curb and gutter is effective during large rain events because it prevents the road from flooding. And the City wanted to make South Shore Drive conform to other city streets. Kevin and others opposed to the curb and gutter plan argued that Plymouth is the largest area drain - ing stormwater into Medicine Lake. They reminded the City of Plymouth that stormwater carries pollutants and that the City's own Surface Water Management Plan contains strong protections for the lake. They pointed out that the City must conform to Federal non - degradation and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPP). They also pointed out that there is no flooding problem on South Shore Drive. Kevin also talked about the road itself, which had been there for more than 30 years. The road was not breaking up at the edges, but in the middle. He said that alternatives to curb and gutter should be considered for treating stormwater such as pervious asphalt, swales and rain gardens. Result: minimum curb and gutter! ....,__ In 2004, Medicine Lake was placed on the MPCA's im- paired waters list because the available data indicated that Medicine Lake exceeded the state's narrative criteria for nutrients (based on total phos- phorus, chlorophyll-a, and Secchi disc transparency) for the growing season mean. Similarly, Medicine Lake has typically not met the BCWMC water quality goals. Medicine Lake will continue to be affected by the problems that occur when a lake's water- shed has become urbanized. The increased volume and pollutant levels of storm water runoff from the watershed, combined with internal sources of phosphorus, result in peri- ods of poor lake water quality. A reduction in the phosphorus concentration in the lake is needed to improve or maintain water transparency and reduce algal blooms. Over Half -Way There The exciting thing about the Medicine Lake TMDL is that the City of Plymouth and BCWMC have already accom- plished most of the projects needed to improve our water quality. The biggest project was just recently completed on the west side of the lake where Plymouth Creek was carrying about 70 percent of the pollutants. For more information on the TMDL study, please visit www.amlac.org. Click "Reports" on the left side of the page, then choose "Impaired Water Studies." FALL 2010 AMLAC News Page 9 Wildlife Abounds on Medicine Lake One of the best things about living near a lake is its variety of wildlife, and Medicine Lake is no exception. Over the last few years, the Three Rivers Park District has been involved in a very suc- cessful nesting project for spiny softshell turtles on Medi- cine Lake. This year they pro- tected 18 nests averaging 15 to 25 eggs each. Increased shoreline activity and riprapping to prevent erosion present serious obstacles to adult females and hatchlings. So in 2009, a large amount of sand was brought in just west of the beach at French Re- gional Park and the area fenced off to encourage nesting of the softshell turtles. The softshell turtles lay their eggs in June or July, and volunteers protect the nests with a mesh covering. In late August, when the eggs are about to hatch, they put cages over the top of each nest that deter predators, but allow the young turtles to get out. Raccoons and skunks are the main predators of turtle eggs. The project has been so successful at preserving the turtle population that there are plans to enlarge the nesting sanctuary for 2011. Most people are familiar with the snapping turtles on the lake, but many have never seen the large and very wary Spiny softshell turtles. They grow to be 12 -18 inches across and, unlike the snapping turtle, they have a leathery, soft shell. They move very fast, and have been You can often see the nesting pair of bald eagles on Medicine Lake perched on dead tree limbs or soaring overhead in search of food for theiryoung. clocked at over 5 miles per hour. They also nest much closer to the lake than the snappers, preferring sandy beaches. While it is not uncommon to see the snapping turtles a block away from the lake, the softshell turtles usually lay their eggs within 100 feet of their water source. Another exciting find on Medi- cine Lake this year was the continued success of the nesting bald eagles, and the hatching of three fledglings. Mated bald eagle pairs usually return to the same nest each year, but two years ago the pair nesting on Medicine Lake lost their nest in a wind- storm. Luckily, they rebuilt on the lake farther west, inside the French Regional Park boundaries. Bald eagles usually lay their eggs sometime in early April and hatch within 35 days, weighing just four ounces. By 12 weeks, they have grown brown feathers flecked with white and are ready to leave the nest, although it is not uncommon to see them sticking close by, trying to snitch a meal from Mom and Dad. Young birds are mostly dark brown with white splotches on the belly or underwing, and their heads and tails are still dark for their first three to four years. So while you're out enjoying the lake, be sure to watch for all the wonders of nature it provides. And the Three Rivers Park District Wildlife staff asks that everyone be extra cautious with fishing line. Please be sure to manage and properly dispose of your line and pick up any line you might see littering the beaches to help protect all wildlife. Being Smart About De -Icers Is Being Kind to the Lake Deicers washing into the lake are detrimental to fish and our water quality. This year, let's all be kind to the lake and use less salt! Here are some tips on how: De -ice in two steps: First, shovel off as much snow as you can. Then apply deicer sparingly. The Mississippi Watershed Management Organization says that' /, to 3 cups per 1,000 square feet will melt that ice —far less than recommended on the bagl Never use deicer without shoveling off most of the snow. Use the best product for the temperature. And that means the temperature of the driveway or sidewalk, not the air. Sand works best when the temperature is below 0 °. Rock salt, sodium chloride, is cheapest, but least effective. It only melts ice to 15 above 0 °. The more expensive magnesium chloride (MgC12) works to 10 below 0 °. There are other chlorides and acetate products out there. See AMLAC's website at www.amlac.org > Reports > Salt Usage Guidelines for an easy -to -use chart on the kinds of deicers and their lowest melting temperatures. AMLAC News — Association of Medicine Lake Area Citizens AMLAC News Fall 2010 200 Peninsula Road Medicine Lake MN 55441 Windy Picnic on July 24 Yummy BBQ, root beer floats, high winds, and good conversation were the highlights of the 2010 AMI_ -kC- sponsored picnic at East Park on July 24. It was a beautiful sunny day on Medicine Lake but the westerlies were blowing, and we all had to hang onto our plates! A great time to meet and re -meet neighbors and fellow lake users. www.AMLAC.org Links to our partners for a healthy lake, lake study reports, past newsletters, membership and event info, and dates. And now you can get timely updates on AMLAC news via Twitter. Our handle is "AMLAC." Start following us today! Welcome to "LAC News! Our Mission AMLAC Medicine for the Lake To preserve, protect, and promote the water quality in and surrounding Medicine Lake for present citizens and future generations to enjoy. R55CKREG LOG20000 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING Council Check Register 3117/2011 -3117/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 345094 3/17/2011 125324 3M 108.25 SAFETY GLASSES 00005770 257615 !02375242 1301.6610 61.25 SAFETY GLASSES 00005770 257616 _102375229 1646.6610 121.25 SAFETY GLASSES 00005770 257617 02375236 1301.6610 120.50 SAFETY GLASSES 00005770 257618 02375241- 1301.6610 255.00 SAFETY GLASSES 00005770 257619 02375234 1646.6610 31.20- RETURN 257962 01129553 1301.6610 635.05 345095 311712011 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 46.00 257620 0915861 5862.5515 26.00 257621 0814090 5862.5515 62.00 257775 0814120 5842.5515 134.00 345096 311712011 111228 ALDEN POOL& MUNICIPAL SUPPLY 1,774:13 METERS 00001477 257858 110056 5915.6406 1,774.13 345097 311712011 100058 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 ' 38,820.60 RECYCLING 257562 2451175 5952.6183 38,820.60 345098 3/1712011 124837 ALT, MARY ELLEN 54.00 TRIP REFUND 257748 030811 1628.4392.07 54.00 345099 311712011 101479. AMERICAN SERVICES CORP. 192.32. BOILER MAINTENANCE 257859 2363 5821.6215 192.32 345100 3/17/2011 128370 AMERICAN TRAFFIC, SAFETY SERVIC 120.00 TRAINING 00001466 257940 90036279 1281.6104 120.00 345101 3/1712011 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 101.07 COFFEE SERVICE 257860 980477 7411.6103 101.07 345102 3/17/2011 105054 ARROWWOOD RESORT 326.25 CONFERENCE LODGING 257861 911 2310.6104 a 326.25 Subledger Account Description SAFETY EQUIPMENT SAFETY EQUIPMENT SAFETY, EQUIPMENT SAFETY EQUIPMENT SAFETY EQUIPMENT SAFETY EQUIPMENT 3/16/2011 7:43:49 Page - 1 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST OF, GOODS,SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES RECYCLING CHARGES SENIOR TRIPS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE CONFERENCES &'SCHOOLS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER TREATMENT RECYCLING SENIOR CITIZENS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY TRAINING PSTF OCCUPANCY CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS E911 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/1612011 7:43:49 Council Check Register Page - 2 3/17/2011 - 3/17/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 345103 311712011 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 33.00 257563 030111 5821.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 33.28 257563 030111 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 46.03 257563 030111 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 66.03 257563 030111 5210.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GOLF DOME PROGRAM 68.91 257563 030111 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 82.60 257563 030111 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 84.97 257563 030111 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 90.08 257563 030111 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 101.98 257563 030111 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 173.95 257563 030111 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 238.05 257563 030111 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 246.15 257563 030111 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 298.39 257563 030111 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 298.40 257563 030111 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 609.12 257563 030111 5620.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 2,470.94 345104 3/1712011 104345 BARCLAY AUDIO 145.33 SOUND SYSTEM REPAIR 257862 030811 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 145.33 345105 311712011 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 31.90 BATTERIES 00001549 257678 018 - 228117 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 35.24 BATTERIES 257679 018 - 228666 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 37.55 BATTERIES 257863 018 - 228816 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 104.69 345106 311712011 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 321.31 BATTERIES 00005768 257507 7642 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20.00- CREDIT 257508 C15436 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 85.00- CREDIT 257509 C15590 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 380.12 BATTERIES 00005765 257564 C15391 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 509.90 BATTERIES 00005764 257565 C15553 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,106.33 345107 3117/2011 127908 BAZZILLIONS, THE 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 3/24/11 257934 031111 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 345108 311712011 128358 BELL, CATHERINE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/16/2011 7:43:49 Council Check Register Page - 3 3/17/2011 - 3/17/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 166.77 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 257747 5433 BROOKVIEW 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 166.77 345109 3/1712011 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 745.95 257622 57302300 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 128.55 257623 57302400 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 113.55- 257624 57306400 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 348.26 257625 84898900 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 68.31 257626 84898800 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 106.91 257627 84898700 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 78.44 257628 84898600 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 414.50 257776 57410300 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 140.05 257777 57409000 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 121.10 257778 57409100 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 21.50 257779 57409200 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 32.65 257780 84928700 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,092.67 345110 3/1712011 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 1,394.71 SNOW REMOVAL -MAR 2011 257864 136906 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,394.71 345111 311712011 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 42.74 EXPANSION FILES 257566 WO- 679890 -1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 38.46 PENS 257567 OE- 249274 -1 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 26.87 BINDERS 257680 WO- 678895 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1.81 .INDEX CARDS 257681 WO- 680505 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 29.90 3 RING BINDERS 257682 WO- 680427 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 20.25 PICTURE HANGING STRIPS 257683 WO- 680405 -1 1550.6406 GENE_ RAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 160.03 345112 3117/2011 123329 BLOTZ, MOLLY 120.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 254966 012711 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 280.00 INSTRUCTOR AC. 256831 022411 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 400.00 345113 3/1712011 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 201.57 TONER, PAPER 00003531 257755 67055 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 201.57 345114 3/1712011 128365 BOLD ENTERPRISES LLC 80.00 RSO TRAINING 257865 030711 7414.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC PROGRAMS R. R55CKREG LOG20000 GOLF BALLS 257867 CITY OF EDINA 5440.5511 288.00 GOLF BALLS - 1001816344. Council Check Register 69.75 GOLF BALLS 257869 1001815537 5446.5511 3/1712011 -3/17/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 119.96 80.00 257568. 922242781 5440.5511 144.46 345115 311712011 922242783 119631 BONNER & BORHART LLP 213.21 GOLF CLUB 257570 922242782 5440.5511 17,575.00 PROSECUTING 257941 51894 1195.6103 , 709.46 MERCHANDISE 17,575.00 922242778 5440.5511 2,356.02 GOLF CLUBS 345116 3/17/2011 5440:5511 128363 BOTHWELL, JILL GOLF CLUB 257574 922244995 5440.5511 11,003.47 178.00 SPRING CLASS REFUND 257754 030711 5511.6136 BUY BACK CREDIT 257963 178.00 5440.5511 10,610.09 345117 311712011 345121 311712011 119351 BOURGETIMPORTS 31.23 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 179.00 030811 257766 102723 5842.5513 257684 030811 179.00 168.93 345118 311712011 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 51.17 SENSOR 00005698 257510 494585 , 1553.6530 169.15 STEP ASSEMBLY 00005692 - 257866 492346X1 1553.6530 220.32 345119 3117/2011 104470 BRIDGESTONE GOLF INC. Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 224.64 GOLF BALLS 257867 1001816083 5440.5511 288.00 GOLF BALLS 257868 1001816344. 5440.5511. 69.75 GOLF BALLS 257869 1001815537 5446.5511 582.59 345120 311712011 102149. CALLAWAY GOLF 119.96 GOLF CLUB 257568. 922242781 5440.5511 144.46 GOLF CLUB 257569- 922242783 5440.5511 213.21 GOLF CLUB 257570 922242782 5440.5511 696.04 GOLF CLUBS 257571 922244996 5440.5511 709.46 MERCHANDISE 257572 922242778 5440.5511 2,356.02 GOLF CLUBS 257573 922242779 5440:5511 38.47 GOLF CLUB 257574 922244995 5440.5511 11,003.47 GOLF CLUBS 257575.- 922244994 5440.5511 4,671.00- BUY BACK CREDIT 257963 922044502 5440.5511 10,610.09 345121 311712011 121683 CANEPA, AIMEE 31.23 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 257684 - 030811 1400.6104' 137.70 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 257684 030811 1400.6107 168.93 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COST- OF GOODS SOLD WINE REPAIR PARTS _ REPAIR PARTS 3/16/2011 7:43:49 Page - 4 Business Unit LEGAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 3/16/2011 7:43:49 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 5 3/17/2011 — 3/17/2011 Check # Date Amount SupplieO.Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 345122 311712011 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 46.60 257629 15280 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,316.60 257630 15282 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 406.20 257631 15279 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS. SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,769.40 345123 311712011 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE i - 116.00 257781 89406 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 116:00 345124 311712011 100681 CATCO 132.55 AIR SPRING DOUBLE 00005772 257870 3 -05315 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 132.55 • 345125 311712011 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 333.94 ADOBE ACROBAT 00004304 257871 WPG4948 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 333.94 345126 3/17/2011 101256'° CHUCK E. CHEESE'S 1,815.05 DEPOSIT REFUND 257942 031511 1120.4314 INVESTIGATION FEE ADMINISTRATION 1,815.05 345127 3/1712011 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 21.74 % XCEL FOR LIFT STATION 00001495 257576 4794 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 21.74 345128 3117/2011 103040 CITY PAGES 291.66 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 257511 D10040831 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 291.67 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 257511 /310040831 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 291.67 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 257511 D10040831 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 875.00 345129 3117/2011 114548; CIZEK, DARIN 75.16 UNIFORM PURCHASE 257685 030911 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 75.16 345130 311712011, 105313 CLARK ENGINEERING CORPORATION - 2,500.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 00007028 257745 58560 1646.6103 -PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,500.00 345131 3117/2011 120747 CMS 480.00 DRUG TESTS 257512 022011532294 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/16/2011 7:43:49 Council Check Register Page - 6 3/17/2011 - 3/17/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 480.00 345132 3/1712011 100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 264.00 257632 0128027715 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 197.20 257767 0188575026 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 461.20 345133 311712011 101119 COCKRIEL, VINCE 40.80 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 257872 030311 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 40.80 345134 3117/2011 128375 COLEMAN, DAVID 14.00 CLASS REFUND 257936 030911 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 14.00 345135 3/17/2011 120433 COMCAST 1.54 8772 10 614 0023973 257765 23973 -3/11 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 2.97 8772 10 614 0023973 257765 23973 -3/11 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 82.59 8772 10 614 0220686 257873 220686 -3/11 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 87.10 345136 3/17/2011 120826 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT 113.33 CABLE TV ADVERTSING 257513 333397,98,99 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 113.33 CABLE TV ADVERTSING 257513 333397,98,99 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 113.34 CABLE TV ADVERTSING 257513 333397,98,99 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 340.00 345137 3/17/2011 117348 CONBOY, DAN 399.40 CONFERENCE AIRFARE 257686 030811 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 399.40 345138 3117/2011 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 7.49 SAFETY GLASSES 00005738 257514 03863280 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 34.63 GLASSES CLEANING STATION 00005742 257515 03863308 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 42.12 346139 3/17/2011 101590 CORNERSTONE ADVOCACY SERVICE 14,750.00 2011 SERVICES 257577 2011 1504.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 14,750.00 345140 311712011 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 262.52 ID HOLDERS 00010666 257874 10666 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 3/17/2011 — 3/17/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doe No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5,091.61 T- SHIRTS FOR RESALE 257875 10770 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1 459 75 UNIFORMS 257876 10664 5620.6201 LAUNDRY 3/1612011 7:43:49 Page - 7 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS EDINBOROUGH PARK EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS I POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT REPAIR PARTS ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 6,813.88 345141 311712011 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 18.02 114-098556854 WATER 257877 030111 7411.6406 18.02 345142 311712011 104020 DALCO 191.31 PUNCH DEGREASER 00005760 257878 2308213 1553.6530 191.31 345143 311712011 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 1,128.95 257633 591419 5822.5514 2,063.71 257634 591418 5862.5514 1,360.45 257635 591420 5842.5514 4,553.11 345144 3/1712011 118490 DEEP ROCK WATER COMPANY 51.35 622833 WATER 257880 7158992 5620.6406 51.35 345145 3117/2011 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 52.10 SUCTION GUNS 00005823 257879 562999 1553.6556 52.10 345146 311712011 118376 DEPAUL LETTERING 522.50 POLOS WITH LOGOS 257881 6295 1400.6104 522.50 345147 3117/2011 128372 DETLOFF MANAGEMENT 5212 336.80 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 257933 5212 5900.2015 ABERCROMBIE 336.80 345148 311712011 121546 DICK, KENNA 399.40 CONFERENCE AIRFARE - 257687 030811 1400.6104 399.40 345149 3/1712011 103204 DONAGHUE DOORS 157.50 DOOR REPAIRS 00009177 257882 14183, 5111.618E 340.00 DOOR REPAIRS 00009177 257882 14183 5111.6530 3/1612011 7:43:49 Page - 7 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS EDINBOROUGH PARK EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS I POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT REPAIR PARTS ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/17/2011 - 3/1712011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 3116/2011 7:43:49 Page- 8 Business Unit 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT 497.50 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 421400.6710 345150 3117/2011 421400.6710 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES REPLACEMENT 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 421400.6710 4,566.08 CHEMICALS 00001215 257516 82700234 -11 257579 69- 032475 4,566.08 11.25- CREDIT 257883 345151 311712011 20.02 117868 ELK RIVER FORD INC. 00005587 257884 69- 030151 1553.6530 119.88 22,888.64 CROWN VIC 00003180 257943 044235 232.29- CREDIT 22,888.64 CROWN VIC 00003180 257944 044234 22,888.64 CROWN VIC 00003180 257945 044233 22,888.64 CROWN VIC 00003180 257946 044232 257580 S01294157.001 22,868.64 CROWN VIC 00003180 257947 044226 22,862.64 CROWN VIC 00003180 257948 044225 150.00 22,862.64 CROWN VIC 00003180 257949 044224 160,168.48 345152 3/1712011 101956 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC 827.58 E -83 REPAIRS 257756 53728 827.58 345153 311712011 127590 ETTERMAN ENTERPRISES 224.49 WIRE, CABLE 00005784 257578 168381 224.49 345154 3/17/2011 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 3116/2011 7:43:49 Page- 8 Business Unit 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1553.6530 315.00 257636 W- 331937 5862.5515 315.00 345155 311712011 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 241.40 BATTERIES 00005757 257579 69- 032475 1553.6530 11.25- CREDIT 257883 69- 028586 1553.6530 20.02 OIL SEALS 00005587 257884 69- 030151 1553.6530 119.88 BATTERY 00005757 257885 69- 033035 1553.6530 232.29- CREDIT 257886 1- 3585588 1553.6530 137.76 345156 3/1712011 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 621.81 BRASS FITTINGS 00001489 257580 S01294157.001 5913.6406 621.81 345157 3/1712011 103985 FLOR, JON 150.00 GOLF DOME AD DESIGN 257517 2233 2210.6103 REPAIR PARTS COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE EQUIPMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DISTRIBUTION COMMUNICATIONS 3/16/2011 7:43:49 Page - 9 Business Unit EDINA CRIME FUND,K9 DONATION PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GOLF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GOLF ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 3/17/2011 - 3/17/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 150.00 345158 311712011 105824 FLYING CLOUD ANIMAL HOSPITAL 445.90 K9 EXAM AND SUPPLIES 257688 375995 4607.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 445.90 345159 3/1712011 101475 FOOTJOY 554.97 MERCHANDISE 257581 3581024 '5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 677.16 SHOES 257582 3585993 5440:5511 COST &F GOODS - PRO SHOP 820.88 MERCHANDISE 257583 3581923 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 2,053.01 345160 3/1712011 128357 FURNITURE SOURCE INC, THE 80.46 FILE 257717 4207 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 80.46 .345161 311712011 100764 .G & K SERVICES 57.00 257718 022811 1646.6201 LAUNDRY 118.80 257718 022811 5913.6201 LAUNDRY 156.76 257718 022811 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 199.64 257718 022811 1553.6201 LAUNDRY 222,61 257718 022811 1301.6201 LAUNDRY 294.22 257718 022811 5511.6201 LAUNDRY 1,049.03 345162 311712011 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY- MINNEA 41.81- 14309180 AUTO PARTS 257689 022811 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS . 161.37 14309180 AUTO PARTS 257689 022811 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS" 579.72 14309180 AUTO PARTS 257689 022811 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 699.28 345163 3117/2011 119936 GLOBAL OAK 243.75 GOLF ONLINE REGISTRATION 257518 010809 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 712.50 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE. 257518 010809 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT 806.25 ART CENTER E- COMMERCE 257518 010809 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,762.50 345164 3117/2011 ,118941 GLOBALSTAR USA 29.20 R -91 PHONE 257757 2845590 1470.6188 TELEPHONE 29.20 345165 3/1712011 103316 GOETSCH, SAM L. 3/16/2011 7:43:49 Page - 9 Business Unit EDINA CRIME FUND,K9 DONATION PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GOLF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GOLF ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/1712011 -3117/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 397.74 INTERPRETER EXPENSES 257690 HOCKY 4078.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TOURNAMENT 345166 3/1712011 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 390.60 FEB 2011 TICKETS 00001494 257519 7496 5923.6103 390.60 345167 3/17/2011 101103 GRAINGER 95.14 WELDING GLOVES, AEROSOL 00005754 257520 9472108316 1553.6406 26.93 LATCH HASPS 00001490 257584 9475455367 5921.6406 60.05 TUBE CUTTER 00005019 257691 9476221495 1553.6556 197.47 RESPIRATORS, FILTERS 00002001 257719 9476768040 5630.6406 379.59 345168 311712011 124711 GRANDVIEW TIRE & AUTO - CAHILL 54.95 ALIGNMENT 00005822 257692 22757 1553.6180 54.95 ALIGNMENT 00005797 257887 22827 1553.6180 109.90 346169 3/1712011 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 162.25 257637 127631 5862.5513 647.75 257638 127627 5842.5513 810.00 345170 3/1712011 128367 HEFTY GRAPICS INC. 53.64 CALENDARS 257888 1102075 5621.6575 53.64 345171 311712011 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 160.31 TECHNICAL SUPPORT 257585 110262024 1190.6105 1,274.96 RADIO ADMIN FEE 257758 110138015 1470.6151 1,435.27 345172 311712011 101215 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFI 889.28 FEB 2011 BOOKINGS 257693 3506 1195.6170 889.28 345173 311712011 114507 HERMAN'S LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES 335.77 SAND 00001500 257889 091428 5933.6517 335.77 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 3/16/2011 7:43:49 Page - 10 Business Unit INCLUSION PROGRAM COLLECTION SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING PRINTING EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES SAND GRAVEL & ROCK PONDS & LAKES CITY OF EDINA 3/16/2011 7:43:49 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 11 3117/2011 - 3/17/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 345174 311712011 116680 HEWLETT- PACKARD COMPANY 404.14 HARD DRIVES FOR SERVER 00004407 257586 49022820- 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES = DISTRIBUTION 404.14 345175 311712011 103753 HILLYARD INC -MINNEAPOLIS 253.29 CLEANING MACHINE PARTS 00002272 257690 6654649 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 253.29 345176 311712011 100805 HIRSHFIELD'S 99.14 PAINT- "00006035 257720 003430846 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 99.14 345177 311712011 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 11.25 257639 551804 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 283.00 257639 551804 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 135.00 257768 551643 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 851.35 257769 552227 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 949.00 257782 552377 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,229.60 345178 3/1712011 128373 HUDSON, DAVE 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 3/31/11 257935 031111 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC -,OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 345179 311712011 128359 HUSTON, SHEA 86.00 SPRING CLASS REFUND 257750 030711 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC = OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 86.00 345180 3/1712011 128368 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 103.25 PAPER, MARKERS . 00001558 257891 IN- 000020102 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 103.25 345181 3117/2011 127389 JAN LASSERUD CONSTRUCTION INC. 9,760.09 ED PK BATHROOM ADDITION 257746 005 FINAL 5600.1720 BUILDINGS EB /CL BALANCE SHEET 9,760.09 345182 311712011 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 6.05 257694 022811 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 7.77 257694 022811 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 9.64 257694 022811 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 10.23 257694 022811 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 11.12 257694 022811 5210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/1612011 7:43:49 Council Check Register Page - 12 3/17/2011 -3/17/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # T Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 18.56 257694 022811 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 31.72 257694 022811 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 50.33 257694 022811 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 60.16 257694 022811 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 60.49 257694 022811 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 64.38 257694 022811 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 100.73 257694 022811 5431.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 102.73 257694 022811 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 105.74 257694 022811 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 130.49 257694 022811 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 186.56 257694 022811 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS 522.35 257694 022811 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,479.05 345183 3/17/2011 102136 JERRY S TRANSMISSION SERVICE 80.87 RESTOCK CYLINDERS 00005788 257892 0016806 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 80.87 345184 311712011 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 7,929.24 257783 1481336 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 56.60 257784 1481337 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,222.02 257785 1481327 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,066.55 257786 1481328 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 82.80- 257787 1515499 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 10.00- 257788 1514914 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 12,181.61 345186 311712011 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 766.96 257789 1014715 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 536.74 257790 1014712 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 243.36 257791 1015731 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 898.96 257792 1014732 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,104.29 257793 1014711 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 95.12 257794 1014713 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 66.56 257795 1014714 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,488.74 257796 1014717 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 31.37 257797 1014718 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 996.22 257798 1014731 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,330.01 257799 1014730 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 22.11 257800 1014727 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,575.56 257801 1014726 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.12 257802 1014716 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date . Amount Supplier / Explanation 1,421.73 1,180.92 1,672.34 2,727.39 4.557.15 883.12 335.86 35.37 349.76 56.29 CREDIT TAKEN TWICE 13.34 6.90- 2.80- 9.64 2.76 - 23,341.61 345187 CITY OF EDINA 100357 JOHNSON, DAN Council Check Register YORK SELLING 3/17/2011 -3/17/2011 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 257803 1014729 5862.5513 257804 1014723 5842.5513 257805 1014721 5842.5513 257806 1014719 5842.5513 '257807 1014724 5842.5512 257808 1014722 5842.5512 257809 1014720 5842.5512 257810 1014725 5842.5515 257811 1014728 5862.5512 257812 483076 5842.5513 257813 489529 5862.5513 257814 489592 5862.5513 257893 489308 5842.5512 257894 489053 5842.5513 257895 489054 5842.5513 345187 311712011 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 100357 JOHNSON, DAN COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 98.16 UNIFORM PURCHASE 257587 030711 COST OF GOODS SOLD.LI000R YORK SELLING 98.16 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING, 345188 3117/2011 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 124192 JPERZEL & ASSOCIATES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1',350.00 CONTACTS APPLICATION 0WEBSITE257521 30743 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,350.00 345189 3/1712011 122074 KNOLLMAIER, LAURA 10.20 PETTY CASH 257522 030811 39.47 PETTY CASH' 257522 030811 39.66 - PETTY CASH 257522 030811 94.47 PETTY CASH 257522 030811 183:80 345190 311712011 100845 KREMER'SERVICES LLC 26.72- U -BOLT, WASHERS, NUTS 00005773 257695 0000009103 26.72 U -BOLT, WASHERS,.NUTS - 00005773 257696 0000009095 53.44 345191 3117/2011 116776`_ KUSTOM KARRIERS 153.74 DWI TOW 257588 030811 153.74 DWI TOW 257588 . 030811 153.74 DWI TOW 257932 031411 461.22 3/16/2011 7:43:49 Page- 13 - Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD.LI000R YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING, COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1646.6201 LAUNDRY 2210.6124 WEB.DEVELOPMENT 5631.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5631.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2340.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE COMMUNICATIONS CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL LAKES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DWI FORFEITURE DWI FORFEITURE DWI FORFEITURE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/16/2011 7:43:49 Council Check Register Page - 14 3/17/2011 -3117/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 345192 3117/2011 101220 LAND EQUIPMENT INC. 69.08 SKID SHOE, HYDRAULIC FLUID 00002078 257523 223383 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 20.17 HOSE, FITTINGS 00002078 257524 223619 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 98.76 WIPER ARM, SPACERS 00002089 257525 223966 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 249.76 SKID SHOES, BATTERY 00002092 257526 224367 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 437.77 345193 3/1712011 124611 LARSCO INC. 495.23 MIX VALVE PARTS 00001493 257896 2770 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 495.23 345194 311712011 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 446.09 NUTS, BOLTS, TY -RAP 00005751 257589 0209831 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 218.06 NUTS, CAPSCREWS 00001556 257897 0228756 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 9.85 TAP 00005642 257898 0228754 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 281.20 NUTS, FITTINGS, TIES 00005763 257899 JT48871 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 955.20 345195 311712011 116575 LIFE LINE INC. 4,769.19 2 AEDS 00001213 257527 LL -3654 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 4,769.19 345196 3/1712011 124810 LIFT BRIDGE BEER COMPANY 130.00 257815 11982 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 130.00 345197 3117/2011 101314 LITTLE BLIND SPOT, THE 120.15 BLINDS REPAIR 257900 SNS21248 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 120.15 345198 3/1712011 100857 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC. 297.44 NUTS, BOLTS 00005681 257901 00046658 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 297.44 345199 3/17/2011 112677 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,080.07 257640 104635 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,080.07 345200 3/1712011 101165 M.AA.O. 100.00 STUDY EXAM - ADRIENNE GARCIA 257528 030811 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 100.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/1712011 - 3/17/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier L Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 345201 3/17/2011 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIP INC: 180.00 VEHICLE REPAIR TRAINING 00005776 257902 031011 1281.6104 180.00 345202 311712011 128360 MANEESH, PONATH 92.00 SPRING CLASS REFUND 257751 030711 5511.6136 92.00 345203 3/1712011 100875 MCCAREN,DESIGNS INC. 471.32 PLANTS 00002270 257903 50936 5620.6620 471.32 345204 3/1712011 128362 MCCONNELL, KRISTI 42.00 SPRING CLASS REFUND 257753 030711 5511.6136 42.00 345205 3117/2011 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 1,728.00 PLYMOUTH PLAYHOUSE TRIP 257529 030311 1628.6103.07 1,728.00 3452.06 3/17/2011 101483 MENARDS 45.37 CLEANERS 00006401 257722 30022 5421.6511 60.55 HAND VAC, SQUEEGEES, DUSTER 00006229 257723 32336 5421.6511 . 60.50 PAINT 00006405 257724 35299 5422.6406 166.42 345207 311712011 101987 MENARDS 36.73 GLOVES, PAILS _ 00002000 257725 69285 5630.6406 14.92 MURIATICACID 00002000 257726 69304 5630.6406 ' 319.56 PRESSURE WASHER 00002003 257727 69481 5630.6406 371.21 345208 3/1712011 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME 365,307.57 SEWER SERVICES 257590 0000954233 5922.6302 365,307.57 345209 311712011 128364 MHP 83.31 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 257772 JEAN TEMPLE 1470.4329 83.31 345210 3117/2611 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & Subledger Account Description . CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 3/16/2011 7:43:49 Page - 15 Business Unit TRAINING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS TRIPS PROF'SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL GRILL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT AMBULANCE FEES -. FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3/16/2011 7:43:49 Page - 16 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION ASSESSING DISTRIBUTION TRAINING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL' POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GOLF ADMINISTRATION E911 EDINBOROUGH PARK 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/17/2011 — 3117/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger. Account Description 1,347.50 REPLACE STANDPIPE 00001502 257904 33790 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,347.50 345211 3/1712011 101320 MINNEAPOLIS AREA ASSOC. OF REAL 111.00 MLS ACCESS FEES 257728 -1653868 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 111.00 345212 3/1712011 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 16,207.30 431 - 0005.300 WATER PURCHASE 257591. 030411 5913.6601 WATER PURCHASED 16,267.30 345213 311712011 105716 MINNESOTA AWWA 700.00- CONFERENCE FEE (4) 257697 2011: • 5919.6104 , CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 700.00 345214 3/1712011 128354. MINNESOTA CORRECTIONS ASSOCIAT- 50.00 JOB FAIR FEE 257698 2011 1400.6104 CONFERENCES `& SCHOOLS 50.00 345215 3/1712011 101746 MINNESOTA COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASS 289.24 INVENTORY RECEIPT FORMS 257950 18087930 1400.6575 PRINTING 289.24 345216 3/1712011 100905 MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION 360.00 MGA MEMBERSHIP DUES 257729 .:. 2011 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 360.00 345217 3/1712011 120925 MINNESOTA SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATIO . 260.00 APCO CONFERENCE 257905 911 2310.6104. CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 260.00 345218- -- 3/1712011 101385 MITY -CITE INC 1,220.80 CHAIRS AND RACKS 00002265 257906 IN- 508335 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,220.80 345219 3/1712011 127579 MONEY MAILER OF MINNEAPOLIS WE - 233.33 DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING 257530 5266 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 233.33 _ DIRECT MAIL-ADVERTISING `. -257530 5266 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 233.34 DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING 257530 5266 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 700.00 345220 311712011 100912 MOTOROLA INC. 3/16/2011 7:43:49 Page - 16 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION ASSESSING DISTRIBUTION TRAINING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL' POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GOLF ADMINISTRATION E911 EDINBOROUGH PARK 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 3/16/2011 7:43:49 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register_ Page - 17 3/17/2011 —3117/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,635.12 SERVICE AGREEMENT 257699 78164664 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,635.12 345221 3/1712011 101796 MPCA 400.00 PERMIT - MCCAULEY HEIGHTS 257951 031111 04378.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN MCCAULEY HEIGHTS RECON 400.00 PERMIT - KILLARNEY, SHORES 257951 031111 04377.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN KILLARNEY SHORES RECON 800.00 345222 3117/2011 120551 MPROA 75.00 CONFERENCE FEE 257907 2011 1419.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS RESERVE PROGRAM 75.00 - 345223 3117/2011. 101575 MUNICIPALS 780.00 2011 SPRING WORKSHOP 257952 031411 1550.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 780.00 345224 3/17/2011 103814 NASRO 1,100.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 257908 1556CONF 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,100.00 345225 311712011 127547. NEAL, SCOTT H. 60.61 MEETING EXPENSE 257953 031411 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE - ADMINISTRATION 60.61 345226 3/1712011 106662 , NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS 2,365.65 PLASTICWARE FOR RESALE 257909 106914 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EOINBOROUGH PARK 2,365.65 345227 3/17/2011 100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS - 4,077.72 SIGNS 00001451 257910 TI- 0231902 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 4,077.72 345228 3/1712011 116697 NORBLOM PLUMBING 20.08 PERMIT REFUND 257700 ED105314 1495.4112 PLUMBING PERMITS'- - INSPECTIONS 20.08 345229 311712011 128356 NORGREN, JULIE 49.96 UNIFORM PURCHASE 257701 030911 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 49.96 345230 3117/2011 102199 NORTHERN SAFETY CO. INC. 188.80 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003517 257759 P292744901015 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 134.00 RSO CERTIFICATION FEES CITY OF EDINA 030711 7414.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC PROGRAMS Council Check Register 3/17/2011 - 3/17/2011 311712011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 188.80 AGENCY MEMBERSHIP 00007029 257744 13349 -2011 1600.6105 345231 3/1712011 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY CO. 622.00 103.41 WATER COLORS 00009176 257911 40189400 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 105007 NU- TELECOM 160.65 CANVAS, PADS 00009175 257912 40230500 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 264.06 MARCH 2011 SERVICE 257914 80382824 1400.6230 345232 3/1712011 100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO. 557.72 195.41 FLOOR DRY 00003528 257702 1 -11885 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 195.41 345233 311712011 22.51 101318 NOVAK'S GARAGE 00006034 257721 1318971598 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 22.96 CUSTOM END CAP 00002093 257730 3497 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS 22.96 345238 3/1712011 345234 311712011 128366 NRA 3/16/2011 7:43:49 Page - 18 Business Unit ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES 134.00 RSO CERTIFICATION FEES 257913 030711 7414.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC PROGRAMS 134.00 345235 311712011 100052 NRPA 622.00 AGENCY MEMBERSHIP 00007029 257744 13349 -2011 1600.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 622.00 345236 3/1712011 105007 NU- TELECOM 557.72 MARCH 2011 SERVICE 257914 80382824 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 557.72 345237 3/1712011 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 22.51 PAPER, DIVIDERS 00006034 257721 1318971598 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 22.51 345238 3/1712011 101659 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 1,538.96 PEST CONTROL 257760 9562094 -2011 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 696.92 PEST CONTROL 257761 6881124 -2011 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,235.88 345239 311712011 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 765.71 257641 8296625 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,151.29 257642 8296608 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 705.25 257643 8296620 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 129.25 257644 8296632 -IN 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 33.25 257645 8296582 -IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation _ 170.25 603.75 5,202.07 6,558.75 345240 3/17/2011 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 436,40 83.28- 491.61 345243 3117/2011 844.73 345241 3/1712011 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 2,069.78 CHEVROLET EQUINOX 475.60 257954 475.60 41,171.30 467.27 00003180 1,374.22 86366525 765.23 1,366.10 1,084.68 345244 3/1712011 377.90 INC. 1,413.12 977.35 TIRE CHAINS 301.33 257531 1,292.77 170.00 234.95 00005758 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/17/2011 -311712011 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 257816 8296817 -IN 5862.5513 257817 8296831) -IN 5862.5512 257646 66557153 257647 59877856 257731 64730020 257818 2039491 257819 2039483 257820 2039481 257821 2039488 257822 2039490 257823 2039489 257824 2039482 257825 2039484 257826 2039492 257827 2039493 257828 2039485 257829 2039480 257830 2039487 257831 2039486 257915 3454890 345242 3/17/2011 100119 PING 5,202.07 MERCHANDISE 257732 10597451 .5,202.07 345243 3117/2011 111340 POLAR CHEVROLET 21,039.15 CHEVROLET EQUINOX 00003180 257954 86365046 41,171.30 CHEVROLET EQUINOX (2) 00003180 257955 86366525 62,210.45 345244 3/1712011 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 1,223.99 TIRE CHAINS 00005758 257531 271597 170.00 OFF ROAD SERVICE CALL 00005758 257916 275122 1,393.99 5862.5515 5421.5510 5210.5510 5862.5512 5862.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842:5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5822.5512 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5513 5440.5511 421400.6710 421400.6710 1553.6585 1553.6180 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS'SOLD LIQUOR COST OF,GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS'SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE - COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 3116/2011 7:43:49 Page - 19 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING GRILL ' GOLF DOME PROGRAM VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ACCESSORIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS POLICE EQUIPMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 3/17/2011 - 3/17/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 345245 3/1712011 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 124741 POYTHRESS, MATT 183.03 UNIFORM PURCHASE 257592 030711 5913.6201 183.03 345246 3/1712011 102642 PRESTIGE FLAG 658.27 GOLF FLAGS 257733 331110 5422.6406 658.27 345247 311712011 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 144.00 BLADE SHARPENING 00008066 257532 252344 5521.6215 144.00 345248 311712011 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 1,661.51 RUGS, CLEANERS, VACUUM PARTS]0002273 257917 5108 5620.6511 1,661.51 346249 3/1712011 103713 PUBLIC AGENCY TRAINING COUNCIL 495.00 TRAINING CONFERENCE 257703 030911 1400.6104 495.00 345250 311712011 100971 QUALITY WINE 546.33 257648 429043 -00 5822.5513 292.00 257649 429001 -00 5842.5513 18.60 257650 428892 -CO 5842.5513 744.00 257651 428891 -00 5842.5513 480.52 257652 428772 -00 5822.5512 465.20 257653 428943 -00 5822.5513 3,748.05 257654 428787 -00 5842.5512 32.60 257655 425899 -00 5862.5512 148.80 257656 427183 -00 5862.5513 11.00- 257657 418454 -00 5862.5513 1,143.00 257832 429042 -00 5862.5513 2,061.40 257833 427033 -00 5862.5513 18.60 257834 428893 -CO 5862.5513 1,081.99 257835 429002 -00 5862.5513 1,655.45 257836 428771 -00 5862.5512 345251 3/1712011 123898 QWEST 529.43 612 E24 -8657 528.88 612 E01 -8392 297.36 612 E24 -8656 Subledger Account Description LAUNDRY GENERAL SUPPLIES 3/16/2011 7:43:49 Page - 20 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS . EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 257533 8657 -3/11 5420.6188 TELEPHONE 257534 8392 -3/11 1550.6188 TELEPHONE 257535 8656 -3/11 1628.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS CITY OF EDINA 3/16/2011 7:43:49 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 21 3/17/2011 - 3/17/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation . PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 606.52 612 E01 -0426. 257536 0426 -3/11 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 606.52- 612'E12 -6797 257537 6797 -3/11 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 57.78 952 926 -0092 257538 0092 -3111 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 121.95 952 926 -0419 257539 0419 -3/11 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 18.84 651281-1355 B001311 257540 1311 -3/11 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 56.00 257541 0146 -2111 5911.6188 TELEPHONE WELL PUMPS 58.70 257541 0146 -2/11 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 114.23 257541 0146 -2111 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 117.47 257541 0146 -2111 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 138.59 257541 0146 -2111 5821.6188 TELEPHONE'.. 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 166.26 257541 0146 -2/11 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 228.73 257541 0146 -2111 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS " 235.16 257541 0146 -2/11 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 266.83 257541 0146 -2/11 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 2,062.89 257541 0146 -2/11 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 40.20 952 922 -9246. 257704 9246 -2/11 1400.6188 TELEPHONE- POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 104.80 GV911 612 E23 -0652 257705 -0652 -3111 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 ' 200:72 952 835 -6661 257956 6661 -3/11 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 6,557.86 345252 311712011 125321 REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS 384.00 PROGRAM SERVICES 257734 8991 1600.4390.52 REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 384.00 - 345253 3/1712011 124578 REAL ESTATE COMMUNICATIONS GRO 99.00 CONFERENCE 3/25111 257593 030811 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING, 99.00 345254 311712011 106975 RED WING SHOE STORE 109.95 SAFETY BOOTS 00005766 257542 725000001356 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 150.00 SAFETY BOOTS 00005766 257542 725000001356 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 150.00 SAFETY BOOTS 00005766 257542 725000001356 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 285.96 SAFETY BOOTS 00005766 257542 725000001356 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 695.91 345255 3/1712011 126343 -RICHFIELD DQ GRILL AND CHILL 131.99 DILLY BARS; CAKE 257918 546 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 17.99 CAKE 257919 547 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 149.98 345256 3117/2011 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 140.42 SOFTENER SALT 257706 - 00247978 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/16/2011 7:43:49 Council Check Register Page - 22 3/17/2011 — 3/1712011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 90.80 SOFTENER SALT 00003648 257762 00247950 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 231.22 345257 3117/2011 106567 ROGERS, MARY 72.00 CLASS REFUND 257937 030911 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 72.00 345258 311712011 128374 ROOVERS, CHLOE 72.00 CLASS REFUND 257938 030911 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 72.00 345259 3/1712011 128355 ROSEN SHINGLE CREEK 1,451.20 CONFERENCE LODGING 257707 RR7CB260 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,451.20 345260 3/1712011 100985 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO 29.65 DRAIN PLUG, WASHER 00005779 257920 C57215 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 29.65 345261 311712011 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 113.07 RECYCLE PARTS WASHER 00005767 257543 923825583 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 113.07 346262 311712011 124780 SCHAUER, LAUREN 466.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 254991 012811 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 466.00 345263 311712011 118614 SCOTT, LOLETA 54.00 TRIP REFUND 257749 030711 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 54.00 345264 3/1712011 101926 SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION 96.00 SEMINAR (2) 257544 030411 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL 96.00 345265 3/1712011 118211 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 37.50 PAINT 00001456 257708 4068 -9 1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 37.50 345266 3117/2011 105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 400.66 TIME CLOCK REPAIR 00001560 257545 66346917 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 400.66 CITY OF EDINA 3116/2011 7:43:49 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 23 3/17/2011 - 3117/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No- Subledger Account Description Business Unit _ 346267 311712011 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 1,117.00 257658 1489630 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 378.00 257659 1497680 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,288.50 257837 1497688 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 878.00 257838 1489632 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,661.50 345268 3117/2011. 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC. 883.07 MUFFLER, SERVICES 00005769 257594 SF07509 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 883.07 345269 ' 311712011 100650. STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC - 29.73 KEYS 257921 CH- 552764 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING.MAINTENANCE 29.73 345270 3/17/2011 117685 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 393.14 PRINTER CARTRIDGES 257595 107294193 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 393.14 345271 3117/2011 128371 STEINMETZ, ROBERT 35:00 LICENSE-RENEWAL .- 257957 031011 1240.6105 DUES. & SUBSCRIPTIONS ` PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL 35.00 345272 3/17/2011 112668 .STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC. 264.43 ANGLE CYLINDER ,. 00005701 257596 18453 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 264.43 346273 311712011 101015 STREICHERS 799.99 VEST 00003000 257709 1818015 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE, POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 799.99 345274 3/1712011 127005 STRUVE, JESSE 229.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT: 257710 030911 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL 271.00 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 257711 031011 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 500.50 345275 311712011 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 29.74 PUBLISH NOTICE 257763 1303944 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 51.48 PUBLISH AD FOR BID 257764 1303945 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 81.22 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/17/2011 - 3/17/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 345276 3/17/2011 101171 SUPERIOR SHORES CONFERENCE CEN 590.84 KAMLOOPS CHARGE TKT #3224 257922 107267 5110.6103 590.84 345277 311712011 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 878.00 257660 MVP00633 5862.5514 469.00 257661 02077 5862.5514 1,347.00 345278 311712011 104932 TAYLOR MADE 450.08 GOLF CLUBS 257735 15322324 5440.5511 225.04 GOLF CLUBS 257736 15316553 5440.5511 675.12 345279 311712011 120602 TEAGUE, CARY 132.60 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 257773 031111 1140.6107 132.60 346280 3/1712011 101474 TITLEIST 87.18 MERCHANDISE 257597 2314498 5440.5511 87.18 345281 311712011 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 9.21 CYLINDER DEMURRAGE 00005771 257598 418220 1553.6580 9.21 345282 311712011 124753 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES 203.03 COPIER USAGE 257923 172631368 7410.6575 203.03 345283 311712011 101693 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS 316.19 LABELS 00006239 257737 26354 5440.6406 316.19 345284 3/17/2011 122302 TOUCHPOINT LOGIC LLC 3,044.00 DIGITAL RECORDING DEVICE 257546 3445 2210.6710 3,044.00 345285 3/1712011 123649 TOWMASTER 437.82 AIR BAG 00005068 252049 325879 1553.6530 437.82- CREDIT RETURN 00005068 252387 106114 1553.6530 328.53 FENDERS, AXLE KIT 00005794 257924 327974 1553.6530 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 3/16/2011 7:43:49 Page - 24 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP WELDING SUPPLIES PRINTING GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PSTF ADMINISTRATION PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA 3/16/2011 7:43:49 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 25 3/17/2011 - 3/1712011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 328.53 345286 311712011 104064 TRANS UNION LLC 12.40 BACKGROUND CHECKS 257712 02122022 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 12.40 345287 311712011 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALT 55.00 EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL 257738 101762656, 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 55.00 345288 311712011 101172 TWIN CITY SAW CO.. 801.94 CHAIN SAW 00006400 257739 A17601 5422.6556 TOOLS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 801.9,4 - 345289 3/1712011 103048 U.S: BANK 375.00 PAYING AGENT 257599 281.1862 3301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PIR DS REVENUES 431.25 PAYING.AGENT 257600 2811860 3101.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL DEBT SERVICE REVENUES 402.50 PAYING AGENT 257601 2810469 3101.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL DEBT SERVICE REVENUES 425.00 PAYING AGENT 257602 2812456 3301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PIR DS REVENUES 402.50 PAYING AGENT 257603 2810528 3301.6103 PROFESMONAL SERVICES PIR DS,REVENUES - 431.25 PAYING AGENT: 257604 2811861 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 431.25 PAYING AGENT 257605 2809525 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL - SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 402.50 PAYING AGENT 257606 2810472 1000.1303 DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 425.00 PAYING AGENT 257607 2812457 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 3,726.25 ` 345290 311712011 125032, UNI- SELECT USA 1,312.94 AUTO PARTS 257713 022811 1553.6530 REPAIR;PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,312.94 345291 3/1712011 101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 1,118.95 UNIFORM 257714 670.27 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,118.95 345292 3/17/2011 122362 UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE 8,365.00 HOMICIDE INVESTIGATION COURSE 257925 SPI- 12J25 -17 7410.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS PSTF ADMINISTRATION 8,365.00 345293_ 3/1712011 101908 US FOODSERVICE INC 124.26 TOWELS, BAGGIES, LIDS 257743 2/28STMT _.. 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 144.99 BLEACH, DEGREASER, SOAP 257743 , 2/28STMT 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 1,291.42 4 FOOD 257743 2128STMT 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD - GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/17/2011 -3117/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT RENTAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS PAPER SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS SAFETY EQUIPMENT 3/16/2011 7:43:49 Page - 26 Business Unit WATER TREATMENT WATER TREATMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING GOLF CARS DISTRIBUTION COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,560.67 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 345294 3/17/2011 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 788.19 REBUILD KITS 00001487 257608 341828 5915.6406 319.48 REBUILD KITS 00001487 257609 343471 5915.6406 1,107.67 345295 3/1712011 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. 13.25 PAGER 257610 U6096083C 1550.6188 532.57 PAGERS 257926 U0319246C 1400.6151 545.82 345296 311712011 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 4,573.49 EMERGENCY WATERMAIN REPAIR 00001501 257927 16330 5913.6180 4,573.49 345297 311712011 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 264.49 LIQUOR BAGS 257547 190656 -00 5822.6512 568.82 LIQUOR BAGS, TOWELS, TISSUE 257715 190657 -00 5862.6512 833.31 345298 311712011 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 37.83 CABLE, MICRO SWITCH 00006406 257740 30711011 5423.6530 37.83 345299 3117/2011 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 62.84 SAFETY GLASSES 00005762 257928 265871 5913.6610 62.64 345300 3117/2011 119454 VINOCOPIA 348.35 257839 0036575 -IN 5862.5512 233.25 257840 0036681 -IN 5642.5512 168.50 257841 0036680 -IN 5822.5512 184.03 257842 0036683 -IN 5822.5513 934.13 345301 311712011 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC 275.50 LEAK LOCATES 00001498 257716 2396 5913.6103 275.50 345302 3/1712011 122267 WEATHER COMPANY LLC, THE 354.00 STAFF RAIN GEAR 00006237 257611 16489 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT RENTAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS PAPER SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS SAFETY EQUIPMENT 3/16/2011 7:43:49 Page - 26 Business Unit WATER TREATMENT WATER TREATMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING GOLF CARS DISTRIBUTION COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/17/2011 . - 3/1712011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3/16/2011 7:43:49 Page - 27 354.00 345303 311712011 128369 WEDL, MEGAN 85.00 JR GOLF LEAGUE DOUBLE PAYMENT 257958 031011 5401.4593 GREEN FEES EXEC COURSE GOLF REVENUES 85.00 345304 3117/2011 125955 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT COMPANY ' 14,049.52 FINAL PAYMENT 257964 031111 4402.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PW BUILDING 14,049.52 345305 311712011 128376 WEXLER, GLORIA 28.00 CLASS REFUND 257939 030811 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 28.00 345306 3/1712011 128361 WILKINSON, JESSICA 134.00 SPRING CLASS REFUND 257752 030711 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 134.00 345307 3117/2011 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE . 1,833.00 257662 264507 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 348.20 257843 264398 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 811.55 257844 264524 -00 5862.5513 COST-OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,992.75 345308 3/1712011 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 587.99 257845 354318 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 903.76 257846 354320 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,936.55 257847 354319 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,428.30 345309 311712011 117482 WINECONNECT INC. 159.24 WEB - MARCH 2011 257548 760 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 159.24 345310 3117/2011 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 1,416.16 257663 540263 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,837.81 257664 540261 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 34.53 257665 540262 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING _ 146.65 257666 540259 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS'SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,246.80 257667 538625 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8,055.90 257668 540266 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 131.69 257669 540265 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 3/16/2011 7:43:49 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 28 3/17/2011 - 3/17/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 103.31 257670 537199 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 77.87- 257671 825201 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 11,754.20 257770 536132 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 10,207.37 257771 540264 5842:5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,054.50 257848 536130 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 8,424.45 257849 540260 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING, 6,437.05 257850 536128 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,987.17 257851 540258. ` 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 198.46 257852 541115 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 33.44 257653 824696 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 133.15- 257854 825029; -5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE. 50TH ST SELLING 58,791.59 345311 .311712011 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER - - - 1,849.00 257672 720413 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,177.00 257673 720172 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING . 178.20 257674 720173 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,641.10 257675 726933 '_ 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 66.50 257676 720934 5842.5515 COST OF.GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 60.00- 257856 000773 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,537.50 257857. 722500: 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 8,389.30. 345312 3117/2011 101082' WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY 115.33 CART SIGNS 257741 253455 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CARS 321.65 PROXIMITY MARKERS 257742 253405 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 436.98 345313' 3/17/2011 101726 XCEL ENERGY 4,617.83 51- 6824328 -7 257549 .273622425 5420.6185 LIGHT &POWER CLUB HOUSE 256.16 51- 5634814 -2 257550 272943169 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 4,042.91 51- 6621207 -1 257551 273285541 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 495.19 51- 9013604 -6 257552 273319003 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 115.31 51- 5938955 -6 257553 272956628 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS 160.21 51- 6229265 -9 257554 272955929 1481.6185 LIGHT &POWER YORK FIRE STATION ,1,602.34 51- 6229265 -9 257554 .272955929 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 371.01 51- 6046826 -0 257555- .272949816 5422.6185 LIGHT& POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 289.92 51- 6137136 -8 257556 -;273278666 5430.6185 LIGHT & POWER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 21.48 51- 4151897 -6 257557 273250699 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE . 742.42 51- 6979948 -4 257558 273139020 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1,292.82 51- 6979948 -4 257558 273139020, 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,890.80 -51- 6979948 -4 257558 273139020 5841.6185 LIGHT '& POWER YORK OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/1612011 7:43:49 Council Check Register Page - 29 3/17/2011 —3/1712011 Check # Dale Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Acccunt'Descrlption Business Unit 35.70 51- 7567037 -0 257559 273298376 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 4,961.04 51- 4966303 -6 257560. 272934122 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 3,864.62 51- 6121102 -5 257959 273783199 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE - 3,501.51 51- 6840050 -6 257960 273796090 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 17,661.07 51- 5605640 -1 257961 274149298 5911.6185 LIGHT 4 POWER WELL PUMPS 45,922.34 345314 311712011 100568 XEROX CORPORATION ' 168.90 FEB 2011 USAGE - PARK & REC 00004322 257612 053515708 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 35.08 FEB 2011 USAGE- BLDG /ENG 00004322 257613 053515707 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL. CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 116.84 FEB 2011 USAGE 257929 -053515791 5110.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 320.82 545315 3117/2011 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 10,478.17 FUEL 00001200 257930 425692 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 10,478.17 345316 3117/2011 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 183.50 257677 10142 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 183.50 345317 3/17/2011 101572 ZARNOTH BRUSH.WORKS INC 527.96 BROOM REFILLS 00002002 257561 0132246 -IN 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 527.96 345318 311712011 101091 ZIEGLER INC - 450.00 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE 257614 E6395924 1551.6180 CONTRACTED: REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 143.84 HOSE, COUPLINGS 00005778 257931 PC001271081 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION.GEN 593.84 345319 3/1712011 124780 SCHAUER, LAUREN - 72.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 254962 012711 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES . ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 72.00 1,064,282.71 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,064,282.71 Total Payments 1,064,282.71 R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 103,913.73 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 5,256.50 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 1,152.27 03100 GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FUND 833.75 03300 PIR DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,202.50 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 15,008.47 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 222,378.93 05100 ART CENTER FUND 3,445.52 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 568.76 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 30,646.47 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 1,547.83 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 25,965.63 05800 LIQUOR FUND 170,636.38 05900 UTILITY FUND 430,929.04 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 1,680.50 05950 RECYCLING FUND 38,820.60 07400 PS7F AGENCY FUND 10,295.83 Report Totals 1,064,282.71 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 3/17/2011 - 3/17/2011 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing polici s a d procedures date 1-? << Man 3/1612011 7:45:02 Page - 1 Subledger Account Description DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS LICENSES & PERMITS LICENSES & PERMITS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 3/22/2011 11:26:51 Page- 1 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING DUES & :SUBSCRIP.TIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL _ DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS - FINANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE YORK OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES ' CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register ' 3/24/2011 - 3/24/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 345320 3124/2011 105696 3CMA 375.00 DUES - JENNIFER BENNEROTTE 257965 031111 2210.6105 375.00 345321 3/2412011 100613 AAA 140.00 POLICE PLATES 258105 031611 1553.6260 140.00 345322 3/24/2011 100613 AAA 18,333.11 VEHICLES TAXES/TITLES 258106 031511 1553.6260 18,333.11 345323 3124/2011 100715 ACCLAIM BENEFITS 784.00 FEE FOR SERVICES - JAN 258129 0019268 -IN 1550.6103 167.00 FEB SERVICES 258130 0019573 -1N 1550.6103 527.10 HRA ADMIN - FEB 258131 0019516 -IN 1550.6103 1,478.10 345324 3124/2011 10297.1 ACE ICE COMPANY 34.00 258019 0915957 5822.5515 56.80 258302 0814142 5842.5515 76.80 258303. 0915958 5862.5515 44.00 258304 .0814141 5862.5515 211.60 345325 3/2412011 103285 AMEM 100.00 2011 DUES 258132 2011 -00850 1400.6105 100.00 345326 3/2412011 119537 AMERICAN PAYROLL ASSOCIATION 219.00 MEMBERSHIP - VICKI OLSON 258233 152063 -2011 1160.6105 219.00 345327 312412011 101479 AMERICAN SERVICES`CORP. 245.70 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 258232 2364 5841.6215 ' 245.70 345328 3/24/2011 111440 ANTIGUA GROUP INC., THE 1,297.96 MERCHANDISE 258133 3473433 5440.5511 1,297.96 345329 3124/2011 102470 AON RISK SERVICES INC. OF MN Subledger Account Description DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS LICENSES & PERMITS LICENSES & PERMITS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 3/22/2011 11:26:51 Page- 1 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING DUES & :SUBSCRIP.TIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL _ DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS - FINANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE YORK OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/2212011 11:26:51 Council Check Register Page - 2 3/24/2011 - 3124/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 4,254.00 PREMIUM 258134 6100000125957 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 4,254.00 345330 312412011 102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE 57.29 FOOD TRAYS 258075 1525827 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 774.73 FOOD 258075 1525827 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 17.37- CREDIT 258076 1506821 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 814.65 345331 3/24/2011 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 95.99 COFFEE 258077 419340 5210.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GOLF DOME PROGRAM 95.99 345332 3/24/2011 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 211.61 BLADE FOR PLOW 00006409 258078 10082931 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 211.61 345333 3124/2011 126019 B & B PRODUCTS I RIGS AND SQUA 1,557.65 INSTALL EQUIPMENT IN SQUAD 258135 3470 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 355.55 SQUAD MAINTENANCE 258136 3469 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,913.20 345334 3124/2011 128425 BAER, LAWRENCE 6.12 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 258005 #341905004 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 6.12 345335 312412011 128429 BAGLEY, VICTORIA 75.00 SPRING CLASS REFUND 258009 031511 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 75.00 345336 312412011 121083 BARR, FRANK 58.50 ART WORK SOLD 258089 031411 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 58.50 346337 3124/2011 127908 BAZZILLIONS, THE 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 4/7/11 258230 031811 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 345338 312412011 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 1,245.77 258020 57410600 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 325.10 258021 57410200 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,119.99 258022 57400500 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/2212011 11:26:51 Council Check Register Page - 3 3/2412011 -3/24/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No _ Subledger Account Description Business Unit 6.71 312412011 258023, 84926500 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 679.30 258181 57408900 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 140.05 258305 57400400 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 205.89 258306 6036160 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 189.01 3124/2011 258307 84928600 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,911.82 24.57 LUMBAR BACKREST 257966 WO- 681189 -1 1550.6406 345339 312412011 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 24.57 71.50 ART WORK SOLD 258090 031411 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 71.50 345340 312412011 101191 BENNEROTTE, JENNIFER 59.85 SURVEY MONKEY 258137 18154036 2210.6103 45.00 EXPLORERS BANQUET 258138 497E12E165 2210.6104 104.85 345341 3124/2011 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 24.57 LUMBAR BACKREST 257966 WO- 681189 -1 1550.6406 24.57 345342 312412011 103228 BNA - 1•,117.00 EMPLOYMENT GUIDE 258139 10658388 1120.6105 1,860.00 GOV EMPLOYEE RELATIONS REPORT 258140 10658389 1120.6105 2,977.00 345343 3124/2011 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS '115.00 258182 102759 5842.5513 105.50 258308 102822 5842.5513 220.50 345344 3124/2011 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 100.27 V -BELT 00005790 258107 496090 1553.6530 100.27 345345 3/24/2011 122318 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 177.00 BRAEMAR GRILL MEETING 258141 03638 1550.6121 177.00 345346 3124/2011 104470 BRIDGESTONE GOLF INC. 1,577.40 MERCHANDISE 258142 1001816974. 5440.5511 1,577.40 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 345347 3/24/2011 128430 BRUMBAUGH, LORI 86.00 SPRING CLASS REFUND 86.00 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/24/2011 -3/24/2011 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 258010 031511 5511.6136 345348 3/24/2011 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 91.39 GOLF CLUB 258143 922249714 138.00 GOLF CLUBS 258144 922260941 8.22 DEMO CLUB 258145 922260942 631.62 GOLF CLUBS 258146 922266077 342.53 GOLF CLUBS 258147 922266079 815.42 GOLF CLUBS 258148 922266076 724.75 GOLF CLUBS 258149 922270617 545.62 GOLF CLUBS 258150 922270615 1,387.09 GOLF CLUBS 258151 922270616 630.73 GOLF CLUBS 258152 922272707 372.72 RENTAL SETS 258153 922270614 372.72 RENTAL SETS 258153 922270614 1,051.74 RENTAL SETS 258153 922270614 181.27 DEMO GOLF CLUB 258154 922274206 7,293.82 258228 15394 345349 312412011 105315 CALTON, BOB 536.25 ART WORK SOLD 258091 031411 536.25 345350 3124/2011 108688 CANTON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 2,071.00 JAN ADVERTISING 258264 110211 -1 1,540.00 FEB ADVERTISING 258265 110305 -1 3,611.00 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5424.6406 5430.6406 5410.6406 5440.5511 5101.4413 5210.6122 5210.6122 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP ART WORK SOLD ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER 345351 312412011 122888 CAP AMERICA INC. 100.00 STAFF HATS 258360 609238 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 100.00 STAFF HATS 258360 609238 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 100.00 STAFF HATS 258360 609238 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 169.03 STAFF HATS 258360 609238 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 169.03 STAFF HATS 258360 609238 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 638.06 345352 3/2412011 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 1,333.70 258024 15397 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 58.80 258025 15395 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 656.20 258228 15394 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 3/22/2011 11:26:51 Page- 4 Business Unit ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES RANGE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GOLF ADMINISTRATION PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES ART CENTER REVENUES GOLF DOME PROGRAM GOLF DOME PROGRAM GRILL RANGE GOLF ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GOLF CARS YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 i CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/24/2011 -3/24/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger. Account Description 2,048.70 345353 3/24/2011 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 223.87 VIDEO CARDS 00004311 257968 WND0107 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 223.87 345354 3124/2011 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT PRINTING CLEANING SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 3/22/2011 11:26:51 Plge- 5 i Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS YORK FIRE STATION DISTRIBUTION ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT CENT SVC PW BUILDING CLUB HOUSE SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT SENIOR CITIZENS CENTENNIAL LAKES WELL PUMPS i BUILDING MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS GOLF DOME PROGRAM EDINBOROUGH PARK POOL OPERATION COMMUNICATIONS . ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 50TH ST SELLING 241.60 257970 030411 5430.6186 275.52 257970 030411 5821.6186 365.91 257970 030411 5841.6186 452.14 257970 030411 5861.6186 588.21 257970 030411 5422.6186 710.58 257970 030411 1481.6186 1,182.03 257970 030411 5913.6186 1,373.15 257970 030411 5111.6186 1,773.95 257970 030411 1552.6186 1,788.89 257970 030411 5420.6186 1,798.17 257970 030411 5921.6186 2,078.39 257970 030411 1628.6186 2,285.57 257970 030411 5630.6186 3,174.09 257970 030411 5911.6186 4,195.54 257970 030411 1646.6186 10,394.57 257970 030411 5511.6186 16,859.85 257970 030411 5210.6186 49,538.16 345355 312412011 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY, SERVICES IN 8,013.74 258086 2152582 5620.6186 45.96 258087 2153052 5311.6186 8,059.70 345356 312412011 119661 CENTRAL ENVELOPE CORPORATION 143.00 EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER 257967 69181 2210.6575 143.00 345357 312412011 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 382.61 DEODORANT, SPONGES 00008069 257969 516404 5511.6511 382.61 346368 3124/2011 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 349.80 258026 440673 5822.5514 349.80 HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT PRINTING CLEANING SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 3/22/2011 11:26:51 Plge- 5 i Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS YORK FIRE STATION DISTRIBUTION ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT CENT SVC PW BUILDING CLUB HOUSE SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT SENIOR CITIZENS CENTENNIAL LAKES WELL PUMPS i BUILDING MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS GOLF DOME PROGRAM EDINBOROUGH PARK POOL OPERATION COMMUNICATIONS . ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/22/2011 11:26:51 Council Check Register Page - 6 3124/2011 -3/24/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 345359 3/24/2011 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 47.36 00079303- 0155300009 257971 155300009 -3/11 5511.6189 SEWER & WATER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 311.69 00079303 - 0155300018 257972 0155300018 -3/11 5511.6189 SEWER & WATER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 78.86 00102561- 0112920000 257973 0112920000 -3/11 5841.6189 SEWER & WATER YORK OCCUPANCY 248.69 00113607- 0170005201 258070 0170005201 -3/11 1470.6189 SEWER & WATER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,615.85 00077479 - 0113317143 258234 113317143 -3/11 5620.6189 SEWER & WATER EDINBOROUGH PARK 3,028.62 00110793 - 0155200000 258266 155200000 -3/11 5420.6189 SEWER & WATER CLUB HOUSE 47.36 00110793 - 0173001001 258267 173001001 -3/11 5210.6189 SEWER & WATER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 47.36 00110793 - 0173001000 258268 173001000 -3/11 5424.6189 SEWER & WATER RANGE 47.36 00110793 - 0155250009 258269 155250009 -3/11 5422.6189 SEWER & WATER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 100.80 00110793- 0155250018 258270 155250018 -3/11 5422.6189 SEWER & WATER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 347.36 00103650 - 0155252016 258271 155252016 -3/11 7411.6189 SEWER & WATER PSTF OCCUPANCY 20.71 00103650- 0155251008 258272 155251008 -3/11 7411.6189 SEWER & WATER PSTF OCCUPANCY 42.79 00103650- 0155251026 258273 155251026 -3/11 7411.6189 SEWER & WATER PSTF OCCUPANCY 5,984.81 345360 312412011 108513 CITY WIDE INSULATION 1,130.00 INSULATION 00001564 258274 119505 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,130.00 345361 3/24/2011 100688 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERVICES INC 14.92 WINDOW CLEANING 258011 481355 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY 16.49 WINDOW CLEANING 258011 481355 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 25.99 WINDOW CLEANING 258011 481355 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS YORK OCCUPANCY 57.40 345362 3/24/2011 101345 COLOURS 800.00 3 LOGO DESIGN CONCEPTS 257974 10239 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 800.00 345363 3/2412011 120433 COMCAST 2.18 8772 10 614 0373022 258155 373022 -2111 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 2.18 345364 3124/2011 128510 CONNORS, MICAELA 26.00 ART WORK SOLD 258092 031411 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 26.00 345365 3/24/2011 123261 CONSTITUTION STATE SERVICES LL 2,265.00 WORKERS COMP 258156 1524173 1400.6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,265.00 . R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/2212011 11:26:51 Council Check Register Page - 7 3/24/2011 - 3/24/2011 i Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO 9 Doc No Inv No. Account No Subledger Account Description I Business Unit 345366 312412011 100697 COOL AIR MECHANICAL INC.. i 403.78 INSTALL NEW EXHAUST FAN 00008072 257975 73717 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAIN - 416.50 HEATER REPAIR 00006073 257976 73785 = 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAIN 218.00 PUMP REPAIR 00008074 257977 32166 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAIN 1,038.28 345367 312412011 121655 CURA, SARA. 53.30 ART WORK SOLD 256093 031411 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES " 53.30 345368 312412011 102791 D2 SERVICES INC. - 3,111.00 SCADA WORK 00005430 257978 10025 05508.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS WM -508 SCADA SYSTEM ` 3,111.00 345369 3/24/2011 104020 DALCO 747.47 SNOW PLOW COATING 00001434 258235 2309631 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 943.39 ROLL TOWELS; WYPALL, CLEANER80001261 258236 2310107 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 597.97- FLEET CLEANER 00005562 258237 2311290 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 136.07 TOWELS 00001454 258238 2311547 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 169.93 WYPALLS 00001454 258238 2311547 1330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TRAFFIC SIGNALS 12.83- CREDIT 00001454 258239 2261465 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING i 2,582.00 345370 3/24/2011 102478` DAY DISTRIBUTING CO; 2,729.10 258027 592290 5842.5514 ` COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,207.15 258183 592289 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLINGI 5,060.95 258309 592288 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 8,997.20 345371 312412011 1007.18 DELEGARD TOOL CO. I 85.98 TOOLS 00003026 258275 565172 1400.6551 AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 85.98 345372 312412011 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. E " . 120.40 110311867 258240 110311867 -2/11 5621.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 1,407.40 110311893 258276 110311893 -2/11 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,527.80 345373 3124/2011 100726 DIESEL COMPONENTS INC. 216.14 FAN BLADE 00005821 258361 98447 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 216.14 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/22/2011 11:26:51 Council Check Register Page - 8 3/24/2011 -k4/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 345374 312412011 123162 DISH NETWORK 270.00 CATALOG AD FOR EDINBOROUGH 258241 54.53 8255 70 708 1422839 258277 030411 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 54.53 100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC - SOUTHDALE REMODEL 345375 3/24/2011 101667 EDINA HIGH SCHOOL 665.00 CENTENNIAL LAKES PROJECTION 257980 342556 2,117.00 EHS GIRLS SEASON % 258362 032111 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 17,062.20 EHS BOYS SEASON % 258362 032111 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 5621.6122 1000.1303 1000.1303 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 5841.6162 1470.6552 1550.6121 ADVERTISING OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY PROTECTIVE CLOTHING ADVERTISING PERSONNEL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 19,179.20 345376 3/24/2011 101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 270.00 CATALOG AD FOR EDINBOROUGH 258241 YSC -02 270.00 345377 3/24/2011 100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 570.00 SOUTHDALE REMODEL 257979 342557 665.00 CENTENNIAL LAKES PROJECTION 257980 342556 1,235.00 345378 3124/2011 127590 ETTERMAN ENTERPRISES 177.57 MARKER LIGHTS 00005784 258278 168701 177.57 345379 3124/2011 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 27.77 WIPER BLADES 00005757 258108 69- 033298 89.37 BATTERY 00005757 258109 69- 033186 11.00- CREDIT 258110 69- 033162 507.32 REMAN INSTRUMENT CLUSTER 00005757 258279 69-033146 103.76- CREDIT 258280 1- 3590637 509.70 345380 3/2412011 105420 FIKES SERVICES 41.25 AIR DEODORIZERS 258242 17138 41.25 345381 3124/2011 120329 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES INC 144.95 BOOTS 00003534 258071 6983 144.95 345382 3124/2011 119211 FIRSTLAB 197.85 DRUG TESTING 258157 00367212 197.85 5621.6122 1000.1303 1000.1303 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 5841.6162 1470.6552 1550.6121 ADVERTISING OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY PROTECTIVE CLOTHING ADVERTISING PERSONNEL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/22/2011 11:26:51 . Council Check Register Page - 9 3/24/2011 -3/24/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 346383 3124/2011 125460 FRIENDS OF FIRKIN LLC 722.00 258012_ 1052 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 722 -00 - 345384 3/2412011 124541 GEYEN GROUP 293.91 CARPET CLEANING 00006241 258079 21174 5420.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 293.91 345385 3/24/2011 128511 GILMORE, ANDREW 13.00 ART WORK SOLD 258094 031411 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 13.00 345386 3/2412011 120929 :GOVCONNECTION INC. I 6.83 PARTS FOR-MONITORS 00004305 257981 47544217 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 27.88 EXTERNAL FLOPPY DRIVE 00004305 257981 47544217 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL (BILLING) 34.71 345387 3/24/2011 102383 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS AS 305.00 MEMBERSHIP.53523001 257982 0123001 -2011 1160.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FINANCE - 305.00 345388 3/24/2011 101103 GRAINGER 89.85 TORCH, FAN 00006050 258080 9475152014 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 40.21 SPRAY PRIMER 00005829 258243 9483007044 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 130.06 345389 312412011 120201 GRANICUS INC. 774.32 FEB WEBSTREAMING 257983 25107 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 829.64 MAR WEBSTREAMING 257984 25108 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 1,603.96 345390 3/2412011 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 82.25 258310 127858 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 82.25 345391 312412011 i 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 117.12 BALLASTS 258244 951928156 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK ' 117.12 i 345392 3/2412011 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 169.77 REGISTER TAPE 00007515 258158 272110 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING I R55CKREG LOG20000 YORK SELLING 5;118.69 VERNON SELLING -CITY OF EDINA VERNON SELLING 345395 3/24/2011 Council Check Register 3/24/2011 —3/24/2011 PREMIUM Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv,No Account No Subledger Account Description PREMIUM 169.77 37092431 1550.6040 345393 3/24/2011 102778 HARRIS COMPANIES 345396 312412011 7,864.50 TEMP CONTROLS CHANGE -OUT 258281 56140.: 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7.864.50 197.97 LCD MONITOR 00004310 257985 49051070:,.' 345394 3/2412011 125270 HARTFORD 395.19 LCD MONITORS 00004310 257985 49051070 5,112.04 PREMIUM 258159 5257423 =3 9900.2033.05 LIFE INSURANCE -99 258100 6.65 007739140009 COBRA 258166 030111 1556.6043 COBRA INSURANCE. COBRA•INSURANCE HOSPITALIZATION GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CLEANING SUPPLIES PAINT PAINT 3122/2011 11:26:51 Page - 10 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY PAYROLL CLEARING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FINANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5;118.69 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 345395 3/24/2011 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS 23,159.55 PREMIUM 258363 3708087,1 = - 1550.6043 201,382.48 PREMIUM 258364 37092431 1550.6040 224,542.03 345396 312412011 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 197.97 LCD MONITOR 00004310 257985 49051070:,.' 1160.6406 395.19 LCD MONITORS 00004310 257985 49051070 1470.6406 1,892.43 COMPUTERS 00004307 258100 49085554 1554.6710 2,485.59 345397 3/2412011 101073 HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES INC., 199.75 SAFETY TRAINING 00001216 258111 65074429 -001 1240.6104 199.75 345398 312412011 103753 HILLYARD INC'- MINNEAPOLIS 177.53 SOAP 00002282 258245 " 6664342 5620.6511 ,177.53 345399 312412011 100805'- HIRSHFIELD'S 221.60 PAINT 00002275 258246 003430279 5620.6532 14.47 PAINT 00002275 258247 003430781 5620.6532 236.07 345400 3/24/2011 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 2,353.38 258184 552979 5842.5514 56.00 258311. 553142 x5862.5515_ 966.50 258312 553141 5862.5514 3,375.88 345401 3/2412011 128676 HOLLERUNG, JOSEPHINE COBRA•INSURANCE HOSPITALIZATION GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CLEANING SUPPLIES PAINT PAINT 3122/2011 11:26:51 Page - 10 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY PAYROLL CLEARING CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FINANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SERV GEN - MIS PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 100.00 MEMBERSHIP REFUND 100.00 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/24/2011 -3/2412011 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 258231 030711 5601.4541 345402 3124/2011 125176 HORIZON AGENCY INC. 58,231.00 COMMERCIAL PKG PREMIUM 258161 91925 117,534.00 WORKERS COMP PREMIUM 258162 96647 23,906.00 BUSINESS AUTO PREMIUM 258163 96649 2,384.00 INLAND MARINE PREMIUM 258164 96650 202,055.00 345403 3/2412011 100417. HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 695.92 POOL CHEMICALS 00002281 258248 11030807 695.92 345404 312412011 125031- J.S. _PA LUCH COMPANY INC. 81.36 BRAEMAR AD 258365 518033 -2111 81.36 345405 3/2412011 100828 JERRY'S FOODS - 2.41 257986 022811 11.81 257986 022811 12.20 257986 022811 20.88 257986 022811 35.39 257986 022811 37.27 257986 022811 56.81 257986 022811 57.41 257986 022811 75.75 257986 022811 309.93 346406 312412011 102146 JESSEN PRESS 1,046.31 AR & LE SPRING BROCHURE 258072 26871 1,046.31 345407 3/2412011 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 86.40 258028 1516990 83.00 258029 1481332 15.00 258313 1481372 1,756.50 258314 1481371 3,023.90 258315 1481373 31.00 258316 1481376 153.60- 258317 1517915 1550.6200 1550.6200 1550.6200 1550.6200 5620.6545 5410.6122 5913.6406 1622.6406 1628.6406 1400.6104 1600.6106 1470.6406 1629.6406 1470.4760 5421.5510 1629.6575 5842.5514' 5842.5514 5862.5515 5862.5514 5822.5514 5822.5514 5862.5514 Subledger Account Description GENERAL ADMISSIONS INSURANCE INSURANCE INSURANCE INSURANCE CHEMICALS ADVERTISING OTHER GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS MEETING EXPENSE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES DONATIONS - GOVT FUND COST OF GOODS SOLD PRINTING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 3/22/2011 11:26:51 Page - 11 Business Unit EB /CL'REVENUES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL i CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EDINBOROUGH PARK GOLF ADMINISTRATION DISTRIBUTION SKATING & HOCKEY SENIOR CITIZENS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ADAPTIVE RECREATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL I GRILL i ADAPTIVE RECREATION YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING' 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/22/2011 11:26:51 Council Check Register Page - 12 3/24/2011 - 3/24/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 28.00- 258318 1517155 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,814.20 345408 3124/2011 102059 JOHNS, RICHARD 54.97 UNIFORM PURCHASE 258249 031811 5620.6201 LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH PARK 54.97 345410 312412011 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 133.25 258030 1015130 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 536.75 258185 1018940 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,686.02 258186 1018938 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 63.86 258187 1018939 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 102.62 258188 1018936 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 832.43 258189 1018941 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 725.37 258190 1018935 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,755.90 258191 1018937 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 137.21 258319 1018923 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 695.66 258320 1018925 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 908.53 258321 1018928 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 683.11 258322 1018922 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 526.26 258323 1018924 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 754.50 258324 1018926 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,222.85 258325 1018933 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,049.98 258326 1018931 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,253.41 258327 1018929 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 462.88 258328 1018930 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,779.64 258329 1018932 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 81.12 258330 1018927 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,764.01 258331 1018934 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5.04- 258332 489794 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 12.75- 258333 489792 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 7.56- 258334 489793 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 6.67- 258335 490319 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 21,123.34 345411 3/24/2011 128424 KASBOHM, MARIETTA 68.60 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 258004 4517 W 70TH 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 68.60 345412 3/24/2011 128512 KAUFMAN, BEN 6.50 ART WORK SOLD 258095 031411 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 6.50 345418 3124/2011 1,140.49 '796.88 398.24 1,680.08 4,015.69 346419 312412011 755.47 755.47 101792, CUBE -TECH GASOLINE DIESEL FUEL DELO GREASE OIL 112677 M. AMUNDSON LLP 345420 312412011 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIP INC. 00006045 258081 1881213 5422.6581 GASOLINE CITY OF EDINA 258082 R55CKREG LOG20000 : GASOLINE 00005866_258112 1884450 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS 00005866 258113 1884449 1553.6584 Council Check Register 258031 105065 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 3/24/2011 -3124/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 345413 312412011 111018 KEEPRS INC. 142.64 VEHICLE ACCESSORIES 00003533 258073 159216 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 142.64 345414 31241201.1 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 177.00 FLANGED NUTS 00005751 258250 0242888 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 91.69 DRILLS BITS, TORCHES 00001567 258282 0252944 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 39.29 WIRE LOOM- 00005777 258283 0252943 1553.6530. REPAIR PARTS 339.57 FITTINGS, SCREWS; TY -RAP 00005827 258284 0252942 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS = 647.55 345415 312412011 100857 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC. 1 186.87 PINS 00005792 258285 00046975 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 186.87 345416 3/2412011 106301 'LOFFLER COMPANIES INC. 116.58 COPIER USAGE 00005868 258286 1225894 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 116.58 345417 312412011 100858 - LOGIS 1,202.00 258101 33402 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING 2,535.00 258101 33402 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING 3,079.00 258101 33402 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING 3,126.00 258101 33402 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING 5,193.00 - 258101 33402 5910.6160 DATA "PROCESSING 5,215.00 258101 33402 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING 5,942.00 258101 33402 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING - . 26,292.00 345418 3124/2011 1,140.49 '796.88 398.24 1,680.08 4,015.69 346419 312412011 755.47 755.47 101792, CUBE -TECH GASOLINE DIESEL FUEL DELO GREASE OIL 112677 M. AMUNDSON LLP 345420 312412011 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIP INC. 00006045 258081 1881213 5422.6581 GASOLINE 00006046 258082 1881214 5422.6581 GASOLINE 00005866_258112 1884450 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS 00005866 258113 1884449 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS 258031 105065 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX i 3/22/2011 11:26:51 . Page - 13 Business Unit i FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN STREET NAME SIGNS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN I EQUIPMENT OPEIRATION GEN i EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SERV GENII'- MIS ADMINISTRATION CENT SERV GENT- MIS INSPECTIONS GENERAL (BILLING) ASSESSING FINANCE Y I i I MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS i MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN l EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/2212011 11:26:51 Council Check Register Page - 14 3124/2011 -3/24/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,591.19 HYDRAULIC PUMP 00005859 257987 2111975 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 46.73 DIRT DEFLECTOR RUBBERS 00005801 258287 2112145 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 776.18 LIFT LATCHES, LEVERS 00001582 258288 2112048 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 629.46 SIDE SHOE RUNNERS, FILTERS 00005798 258289 2112051 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,043.56 345421 3/24/2011 128426 MARK, LAURA 86.00 SPRING CLASS REFUND 258006 031511 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 86.00 345422 312412011 128513 MARKS, ALICE 42.90 ART WORK SOLD 258096 031411 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 42.90 345423 3/2412011 101555 MARSHALL & SWIFT 266.45 RESIDENTIAL COST HANDBOOK 258251 1051890/87360 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 512.12 MARSHALL VALUATION SERVICE 258251 1051890/87360 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 778.57 345424 3/24/2011 128428 MARVIN, KRISTIE 150.00 SPRING CLASS REFUND (2) 258008 031511 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 150.00 345425 3124/2011 101483 MENARDS 46.36 DIAMON BLADE, TUBING 00001581 258290 30089 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 15.97 MASONRY BIT 00001575 258291 40211 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 62.33 345426 3/2412011 101987 MENARDS 83.54 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00002006 257988 70312 5630.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 83.54 345427 3124/2011 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 499.64 METHANE 258292 1004738 7413.6545 CHEMICALS PSTF FIRE TOWER 499.64 345428 312412011 102137 MINNESOTA ELECTRICAL ASSOCIATI 390.00 MEA DUES 258367 12456 -2011 1240.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL 390.00 345429 312412011 101537 MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AG 45.00 CERTIFICATION FEE 258252 031511 5923.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COLLECTION SYSTEMS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/24/2011 -3/24/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation - -PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 3/22/2011 11:26:51 Page- 15 Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 45.00 i 345430 3/2412011 7412.6136 101878 MINNESOTA REAL ESTATE JOURNAL PSTF RANGE 1550.6121 85.00 JOURNAL SUBSCRIPTION 258253 0069792 -2011 I EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN I 5210.6230 85.00 I GOLF DOME PRO I GRAM 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 345431 312412011 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 118066 MINNESOTA REVENUE 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5862.5513 264.00 LEAD LICENSE 258368 2200078845 PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5440.5511 264.00 PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 345432 312412011 103240 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL :890.00 CPR /AED CLASS 258165 12425 890.00 345433 312412011 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 12.83 STAINLESS BANDS 00005828 258254 0087552 -IN 12.83 345434 312412011 126997 MISSION. ELECTRIC LLC 9,950.00 GOLF DOME LIGHTING 00006147 258166 1111 9,950.00 345435 3/2412011 128514 MORAN, JUSTIN 22.75 ART WORK SOLD 258097 031411 22.75 345436 3124/2011 101608 MSSA 140.00 MEMBERSHIP;(4) 00001215 258255 031811 140.00 345437 3/2412011 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 97.22 FILTERS 00006410 258083 775107 -00 97.22 345438 3/2412011 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 682.50 258192 65174 682.50 345439 312412011 104350. NIKE USA INC. 290.54 MERCHANDISE 258167 931950829 280.15 MERCHANDISE 258168 931910201 722.16 STAFF SHIRTS 258369 932057786 3/22/2011 11:26:51 Page- 15 Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING i 7412.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER PSTF RANGE 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL I 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS I EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN I 5210.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT I GOLF DOME PRO I GRAM 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD i ART CENTER REVENUES i 1240.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS I I PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING I� 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE R55CKREG LOG20000 102712 OFFICE OF..ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOG CITY OF EDINA- 362.68 258102 W11020666 Council Check Register 23.12 258103 W11020660 3/24/2011 -3124/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 46.24 722.17 STAFF SHIRTS 258369 932057786 5410.6406 46.24 722.17 STAFF SHIRTS 258369 932057786 5421.6406 69.36 722.17 STAFF SHIRTS 258369 932057786 5423.6406 ,92.48 3;459.36 258103 - W11020660 5821.6188 345440 312412011 128515 NORDQUIST, PAUL W11020660 1481.6188 115.60 19.50 ART WORK SOLD _; 258098 -- 031411 5 10 1.4413 138.72 19.50 258103 W11020660 5841.6188 345441 312412011 126442: NORMANDALE PTO W11020660 5210.6188 164.38 337.50 EDINBOROUGH PARK AD 258256 - . 031411 5621.6122 206.83 337.50 258103 W11020660 5631.6188 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL- SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES ART WORK SOLD ADVERTISING OTHER 345442 3/2412011 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC- 442.74 EMERGENCY LIGHTS 00005799 258114 26951 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 442.74 345443 3/2412011 102712 OFFICE OF..ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOG 362.68 258102 W11020666 5420.6188 23.12 258103 W11020660 1646.6188 ,23.12 258103 W11020660 1550.6188 46.24 258103 W11020660 5111.6188 46.24 258103 W11020660 1646.6188 69.36 258103 W11020660 5861.6188 ,92.48 - 258103 - W11020660 5821.6188 '92.48 258103 W11020660 1481.6188 115.60 258103 W11020660 1646.6188 138.72 258103 W11020660 5841.6188 157.03 258103 W11020660 5210.6188 164.38 258103 W11020660 1646.6188 206.83 258103 W11020660 5631.6188 206.84 258103 W11020660 5621.6188 323.68 258103 W11020660 1622.6188 40.00 MN ST IAP TELCOM SERV 258169 W10070699 1400.6204 142.50 MN ST IAP TELCOM'SERV 258170 W10090699 1400.6204 2,151.30 345444 3/24/2011 101470 ORVIS, JOAN 19,444.18 SPRING CLASS % CHECK 258013 031.511 5510.6103 19,444.18 345445 3124/2011 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE. TELETYPE SERVICE TELETYPE SERVICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3/22/2011 11:26:51 Page - 16 Business Unit GOLF ADMINISTRATION GRILL GOLF CARS ART CENTER REVENUES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CLUB HOUSE BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT BUILDING MAINTENANCE VERNON OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY. YORK FIRE STATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE YORK OCCUPANCY GOLF DOME PROGRAM BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION SKATING 8 HOCKEY POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 : CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/24/2011 -3/24/2011 j' 3/22/2011 11:26:51 Page - 17 I i Check # Date _Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger, Account Description Business Unit � 270.79 COOKIES 258293 80457806 5421.5510 COST OF -GOODS SOLD GRILL . 270.79 345446 3/2412011 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. :854.92 DOME HEATING REPAIR 00006244 258171 39629 5210.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GOLF DOME PROGRAM 854.92 345447 312412011 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 674.63 258193 8297539 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING! 1,392.76 258194 8297529 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 708.50 258195 8297513 -IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,044.76 258336 8297534 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,820.65 345448 3/2412011 100946 PERA 118.40 DUE TO PERA 258366 030111 1260.6030 PENSIONS ENGINEERING GENERAL 213.14 DUE TO PERA 258366 030111 9900.2033.00 PERA - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING .480.47: DUE TO PERA 258366 030111 5621.6030 PENSIONS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 812.01 i 345449 312412011 119935 PET CROSSING i 125.00 K9 DENTAL EXAM 257989 113438 4607.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 125.00 i 345450 3/2412011 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 149.60 258196 2042506 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING :406.26 258197 2042507 5862.5513 COST OF,GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING) 403.14 258198 2042502 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE - VERNON SELLING] 41.35- 258199 3455298 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING; 96.00- 258200 3455111 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 13.10- 258201 3455113 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING j 574.09 258337 2042503 5642.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 804.56 258338 2042505 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 720.08 258339 2042504 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 814.41 258340 2042501 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 425.60 258341 2042500 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE. YORK SELLING 528.99 258342 2042498 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1',062.19 258343 2042499 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 13:10- 258344 3455110 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 26.20- 258345 3455112 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,719.17 I R55CKREG LOG20000 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 3/24/2011 -3/2412011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 345451 3/2412011 224.50 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 90.00 EXTRA CHG FOR WET MOUNT 00005053 258115 20730BAL 1553.6583 146.95 TIRES 00005758 258116 290266 1553.6583 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 236.95 345452 3124/2011 345457 312412011 106341 PRIORITY DISPATCH 960.00 COURSE FEE (3) 258172 1773 2310.6104 GENERAL SUPPLIES RECYCLING 960.00 345453 3124/2011 101014 PRO MEDIA.STREFF MARKETING GRO 2,281.78 GIFTS FOR ANNUAL MEETING 258257 21335 1100.6106 2,281.78 345454 3/2412011 100971 QUALITY WINE 2,219.19 258202 431692 -00 5862.5512 767.06 258203 431586 -00 5862.5513 337.80 258204 431842 -00 5862.5513 532.27 258205 431703 -00 5822.5512 100.30 258206 431843 -00 5822.5513 362.00 258207 431563 -00 5822.5513 1,341.00 258208 431690 -00 5842.5512 662.40 258209 431691 -00 5842.5512 1,530.63 258210 431702 -00 5842.5512 585.06 258211 431585 -00 5842.5513 1,040.50 258212 431849 -00 5842.5513 94.92 258346 432404 -00 5822.5512 70.04- 258347 427618 -00 5842.5513 Subledger Account Description TIRES & TUBES TIRES & TUBES 3/2212011 11:26:51 Page - 18 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS E911 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 345455 312412011 123896 QWEST 151.57 952 285 -2951 257990 2951 -3/11 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 14.23 952 9441841 257991 1841 -3/11 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 58.70 952 9446522 258085 6522 -3/10 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 224.50 345456 312412011 104450 RAPID GRAPHICS & MAILING INC. 412.54 MAIL WATER BILLS 258014 5430 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 412.54 345457 312412011 102794 REHRIG PACIFIC COMPANY 7,518.66 RECYCLING BINS 00004227 258088 KE70891 5952.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RECYCLING 7,518.66 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/2212011 11:26:51 Council Check Register Page - 19 3124/2011 —3/24/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation - PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description i Business Unit 345458 31.2412011 102407 RICHFIELD TRANSMISSION 2,799.37 REMOVE /REPLACE TRANSMISSION00005865 258117 005404 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,799.37 345459 312412011 118658 RIGHTWAY GLASS INC. - - 211.34 WINDSHIELD REPLACEMENT 00005861 258118 61960 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS i EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 211.34 345460 3/24/2011 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 157.01 JACKS 00005793 258119 1227523 -01 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 157.01 I 345461 3/24/2011 101902 RINK SYSTEMS INC i 2,137.50 PLAYERS BOX DOORS 00008077 257992 1100059 5.500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET - 2,137.50 i 345462 3124/2011 128648 RJ SPORTS .456.00 BAGS FOR RENTAL SETS 00006243 258173 87322 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 456.00 BAGS FOR RENTAL SETS 00006243 258173 87322 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLFiCOURSE 798.00 BAGS FOR RENTAL SETS 00006243 258173 87322 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,710.00 345463 3/24/2011 100980 ROBERT B: HILL CO. I 616.67 SOFTENER SALT 00008068 257993 00248798 5511.6406 GENERALSUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 616.67 345464 3/2412011 100985 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO 184.11 CABLE THROTTLE 00005572 258120 C57232 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 184.11 i 345465 3124/2011 117807 SAM'S CLUB - 56.50 FACILITY SUPPLIES 258294 004533 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 56.50 345466 312412011 104788 SANDY'S PROMOTIONAL STUFF - 296.04 EXPLORERS MUGS SH1_106 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 296.04 345467 312412011 118168 SANSIO 53.44 EMS FAXING 258370 INV020793 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 761.61 EMS SUBSCRIPTION 258371 INV020916 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 . CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/24/2011 -3/2412011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 47073.6710 1120.6104 5821.6180 5841.6180 7411.6103 7411.6103 1240.6104 5421.6180 5842.5513 5862.5512 5862.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5822.5513 5842.5513 05508.1705 3/22/2011 11:26:51 Page - 20 Business Unit EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT VETERANS MEMORIAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 815.05 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 345468 312412011 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 100995 SEH COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2,424.74 ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES 258372 241682 2,424.74 345469 3/2412011 101926 SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION 48.00 SEMINAR - NATHAN FRANZEN 258258 031811 48.00 345470 3/2412011 105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 224.60 ANNUAL SPRINKLER TESTING 258015 74230509 224.60 ANNUAL SPRINKLER TESTING 258016 74230510 698.19 SPRINKLER SYSTEM REPAIR 258295 66149093 271.72- CREDIT - INV 66149093 258296 91414775 875.67 345471 3124/2011 105739 SNAZA, DAVID 308.61 TRAINING EXPENSES 258373 031811 308.61 345472 312412011 102935 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION INC 1,980.14 ICE MACHINE REPAIR 00006340 258297 14481 1,980.14 345473 3/2412011 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 257.00 258032 1516895 143.95 258213 1489637 977.22 258213 1489637 1,633.00 258348 1517980 301.00 258349 1497743 129.00 258350 1489636 863.50 258351 1518372 4,304.67 345474 3124/2011 122455 SPRING LAKE ENGINEERING 10,145.20 SCADA PROGRAMMING 00005430 258121 1137 10,145.20 345475 3/24/2011 101004 SIPS COMPANIES 47073.6710 1120.6104 5821.6180 5841.6180 7411.6103 7411.6103 1240.6104 5421.6180 5842.5513 5862.5512 5862.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5822.5513 5842.5513 05508.1705 3/22/2011 11:26:51 Page - 20 Business Unit EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT VETERANS MEMORIAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CONSTR. IN PROGRESS WM -508 SCADA SYSTEM 155.24 PVC PIPE, CAP, PLUG 00005826 258259 S2340097.001 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 45.98 ADAPTER 00005826 258260 S2340097.002 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/2212011 11:26:51 Council Check Register Page - 21 3/24/2011 - 3/24/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No - Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 201.22 345476 3/2412011 103277, ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC. 119.70 LAMPS 00005769 258122 SI84762 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 147.85 MIRROR 00005830 258123 SI84991 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 267.55 - 345477 3/2412011 100650 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC 527.41 MONITORING CHARGES 258074 8106891 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 527.41 345478 3/2412011 102170 STAR OF THE NORTH CONCERT BAND 100.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 4/4/11 258229 031811 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 100.00 345479 3/24/2011 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 1,790.00 HELP WANTED ADS 258174 1000001302 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,790.00 345480 3/2412011 101015 STREICHERS 47.00 SLING, ADAPTER 00003024 258175 1820598 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 47.00 345481 3/2412011 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 3,098.31 TRANSMISSION 00005700 257995 301366 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 54.54 GASKET, SEALS 00005825 257996 303071 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 521.02 BLADES 00005470 258124 282102 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 720.00 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005860 258125 587973 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 393.05 VEHICLE REPAIRS .. 00005867 258261 588266 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 4,786.92 345482 3124/2011 121161 . SUPER MEDIA LLC 41.33 PHONE LISTING. 257997 030411 5621.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 41.33 PHONE LISTING 257997 030411 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 41.34 PHONE LISTING 257997 030411 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 124.00 345483 312412011 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 819.00 258033 02107 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,798.00 258034 02108 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,617.00 RSSCKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/2212011 11:26:51 Council Check Register Page - 22 3/2412011 -3/24/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 345484 312412011 105982 T.P.C. LANDSCAPE 287.50 SIDEWALK SHOVELING 257998 413889 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 287.50 345485 3/2412011 124781 TALY, HENRY 50.05 ART WORK SOLD 258099 031411 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 50.05 345486 3124/2011 104932 TAYLOR MADE 1,769.28 MERCHANDISE 258176 15329009 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,997.23 MERCHANDISE 258177 15335527 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES. 3,766.51 ' 345487 3/24/2011 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 4,496.65 258352 631406 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 93.20 -258353 631405 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,11589;65 345488 3124/2011 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. _ - 291.66' . MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 258017 -2011- 56454 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 291.67 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 258017 2011 -56454 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 291.67 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 258017 2011 -56454 58.42:6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 875.00 345489 3/24/2011 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. 742.00 THEATER DOORS 258262 444566 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 742.00 345490 3/2412011 100363 U.S. BANK 49.03 FIRE DEPT EXPENSES 258374 031811 1470.6530. REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ,98.95 FIRE DEPT, EXPENSES 258374 031811 1470.6579 TRAINING AIDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 217.88 FIRE DEPT EXPENSES 258374 031811 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL, SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 229.00 FIRE DEPT EXPENSES 258374 031811 1470:6105 - DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT: GENERAL 331.00 FIRE DEPT EXPENSES 258374, 031811 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,820.98 FIRE DEPT EXPENSES 258374 _ 031811 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,746.84 345491 3/2412011 115379 U.S. BANK - 17.90 NET ZERO 257999' > 030311 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 38.20 INTERNET 257999 030311 1550.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 56.10 3/22/2011 11:26:51 Page - 23 Business Unit LIQUOR YORK GENERAL WATER TREATMENT YORK SELLING 345495 312412011 _ 128427 VARMA, SUJIT 86.00 SPRING CLASS REFUND 258007 031511 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 258179 86.00 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 527.36 R55CKREG LOG20000 345496 3/2412011 CITY OF EDINA 345501 3124/2011 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE ' Council Check Register VGM DUES 258299 190035 -2011 5410.6105 DUES &SUBSCRIPTIONS 250.20 3/24/2011 -3/24/2011 160.00 Check # Date Amount Supplier /Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 345492 3/24/2011 114585 UNITED PUBLISHERS NETWORK 49.95 WINE ENTHUSIAST MAGAZINE 258018 0111G- 948303 5840.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRST AID SUPPLIES ' 49.95 501.40 345493 3124/2011 345498 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 252.27 RATE METER, REGULATOR 00001487 258298 347400 5915.6406 GENERAL' SUPPLIES 258300 5265282 252.27 GENERAL SUPPLIES 106.16 '345494 312412011 5265282 101058 VAN PAPER CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 174.09 ,636.61 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 258178 191492 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 312412011 636.61 3/22/2011 11:26:51 Page - 23 Business Unit LIQUOR YORK GENERAL WATER TREATMENT YORK SELLING 345495 312412011 _ 128427 VARMA, SUJIT 86.00 SPRING CLASS REFUND 258007 031511 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS GOLF ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT STREET_ LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION 2 .36 FEB 2011 CHARGES 258179 86.00 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 527.36 345496 3/2412011 102571 VGM CLUB 345501 3124/2011 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE ' 160.00 VGM DUES 258299 190035 -2011 5410.6105 DUES &SUBSCRIPTIONS 250.20 258215 160.00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 404.25 258216 345497 312412011 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 128680 VIDACARE CORPORATION 501.40 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003527 258375 5988 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES ' 501.40 345498 3/2412011 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 67.93 GRIP, SOCKET PIN;. 00001570 258300 5265282 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 106.16 CAUTION TAPE 00001570 258300 5265282 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 174.09 345499 312412011 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 553.05 SAFETY VESTS, GLOVES. 00001577 258263 257891 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 23.73- SAFETY GLASSES 00005762 258301 266150 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 576.78 345500 - 312412011 5 7 102798 WEST PAYMENT CENTER GOLF ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT STREET_ LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION 2 .36 FEB 2011 CHARGES 258179 822396816 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 527.36 345501 3124/2011 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE ' 1,325.15 258214 265057 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 250.20 258215 264961 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 404.25 258216 264962 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 312212011 11:26:51 R556KREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 24 3/24/2011 -3/24/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 15.28- 258217 256001 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 216.00- 258218 264688 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,748.32 345502 312412011 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 2,978.64 258219 355110 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,130.08 258220 355108 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 748.32 258354 355109 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 240.50 258355 355107 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5,097.54 345503 3/2412011 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 415.77 258035 542380 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,330.82 258221 542014 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8,885.23 258222 543533 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 114.20 258223 543534 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 33.38 258224 543532 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,558.32 258224 543532 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,224.78 258225 543536 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 73.10 258226 543537 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 4,021.28 258227 543539 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,694.07 258356 544025 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 217.80 258357 544026 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,022.48 258358 543535 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 28,591.23 345504 312412011 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 1,541.88 258036 722709 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 28.80 258037 722734 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,886.18 258038 722733 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,068.36 258039 723527 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 45.00 258040 723528 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5,570.22 345505 3/24/2011 101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY 79.04 DISPLAY 258180 253846 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 79.04 345506 312412011 112752 WPS- MEDICARE PART B INS. CORP. 22.07 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 258104 ROBERT HILL 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 22.07 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 312412011 — 3124/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 345507 3/24/2011 101726 XCEL ENERGY 6,026.13 51- 5888961 -7 258000 273781034 1375.6185 LIGHT & POWER 1,743.75 - 51- 5619094 -8 - 258001 273771212 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER t 371.25 51- 4197645 -8 258002 273935585 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER 3,284.82 51- 6227619 -3 '258003 274338965 5630.6185 LIGHT & POWER 11,425.95 345608 3/24/2011 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 8,579.66 DIESEL FUEL 00001010 258126 419559 1553.6581 GASOLINE 5,773.80 DIESEL FUEL 00001010 258127 421641 1553.6581 GASOLINE ' 16,260.93 FUEL 00001200 258128 427485 1553.6581 GASOLINE 30,614.39 345509 3/24/2011 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE '. 83.45 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 00006411 258084 54067033 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 83:45 886,490.03 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 886,490.03 Total Payments 886,490.03 3/22/2011 11:26:51 Page - 25 Business Unit PARKING RAMP CENT SVC PW BUILDING STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CENTENNIAL LAKES EQUIPMENT OPERATION.GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE &GROUNDS R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 3/24/2011 - 3/24/2011 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 566,344.76 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 3,322.85 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 960.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 2,549.74 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 1,557.65 05100 ART CENTER FUND 2,319.64 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 31,576.15 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 45.96 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 33,531.17 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 54,093.76 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 19,279.17 05800 LIQUOR FUND 122,978.87 05900 UTILITY FUND 25,509.97 05950 RECYCLING FUND 7,518.66 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 9,576.50 09900 PAYROLL FUND 5,325.18 Report Totals 886,490.03 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies apd procedures 3/22/2011 11:27:45 Page- 1 R55CKREG LOG20000 SAFETY EQUIPMENT CITY OF EDINA CONTRACTED REPAIRS 3/29/2011 11:22:20 " 1,116.84 RAMP WINDOW CLEANING 00005434 258582 Council Check Register :. Page - 1 345517 313112011 3/25/2011 = 3/31/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 345510 312512011 345518 3/3112011 101926 "SENSIBLE LAND USE COALITION 100576 ALL SAFE INC. - _ EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 48.00 SEMINAR- JONI BENNETT 258521 032511 1100.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CITY COUNCIL 104488 48.00 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE- 258583 104488 350.00 345511 313112011 104488 110728 10,000 LAKES CHAPTER 350.00 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 258583 104488 1,119.62 85.00 DAVE MICKELSON 258663 2011 SEMINAR 1495.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS INSPECTIONS 85.00 630.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 258726 032511 345512 313112011 101971 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER INC. 66.79 HOSE / PIPE 00001588 258522 1- 829197 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES . WELL HOUSES 66.79 345513 3/3112011 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 33,801.36 TRUCK BOX 00005055 258523 0128212 -IN:, 5900.1735 AUTOMOBILES &TRUCKS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 33,801.36 345514 313112011 124613 ABM JANITORIAL- NORTH CENTRAL 104.74 SCRUB & RECOAT FLOOR 258415 2264635 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL " 104.74 345515 3131/2011 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 38.00 258779 0814168 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 345516 313112011 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 100615 ACME WINDOW CLEANING INC CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5424.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,116.84 RAMP WINDOW CLEANING 00005434 258582 76695 :. 1,116.84 345517 313112011 105162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 34.74 ALARM MONITORING 258664 43305986 34.74 345518 3/3112011 100576 ALL SAFE INC. - 139.87 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 258583 104488 139.87 EXTINGUISHER.MAINTENANCE' 258583 104488 139.88 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE- 258583 104488 350.00 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE` 258583 104488 350.00 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 258583 104488 1,119.62 345519 313112011 " 100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN_ 630.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 258726 032511 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5111.6250 ALARM SERVICE 5210.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 5420.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5424.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT GOLF DOME PROGRAM CLUB HOUSE RANGE GRILL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 3/29/2011 11:22:20 Page- 2 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 360.00 GIFT SHOP WORK CITY OF EDINA 032511 R55CKREG LOG20000 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 360.00 Council Check Register 345523 313112011 3125/2011 - 3/31/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 223.88 COFFEE 630.00 419339 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 345520 313112011 101506 AMERICAN HOTEL REGISTER CO. 1,532.06 TABLES 258584 2398994 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 1,532.06 345521 313112011 100665 AMSAN PLOW REPAIR 00005876 258524 10083030 1553.6180 421.87 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00001403 258390 240647446 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 262.19 421.87 345522 313112011 313112011 122312 ANDERSEN, IMOGENE 101428 AWWA 3/29/2011 11:22:20 Page- 2 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 360.00 GIFT SHOP WORK 258727 032511 5120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 360.00 345523 313112011 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 223.88 COFFEE 258666 419339 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 223.88 345524 313112011 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 262.19 PLOW REPAIR 00005876 258524 10083030 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 262.19 345525 313112011 101428 AWWA 173.00 RENEWAL- ROGER GLANZER 258665 00157659 -2011 5913.6105 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS DISTRIBUTION 173.00 345526 313112011 104192 BAG BOY CO. 271.25 TRAVEL BAGS 258715 687207 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 3,120.00 RENTAL CARTS FOR COURSE 258715 687207 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 300.00- CREDIT 258716 C688722 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 3,091.25 345527 313112011 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 242.50 STORM WATER MANAGEMENT 258585 23270354.00 -183 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,167.50 WATER RESOURCES MGMT 258586 23271072.00 -15 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 462.00 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 258667 23270354.00 -179 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,872.00 345528 3131/2011 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 563.05 258404 57488500 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 429.65 258405 57500400 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,853.15 258406 57488600 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 3129/2011 11:22:20 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 3 3/25/2011 - 3/31/2011= Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 69.60 258407 57488300 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR . 50TH ST SELLING 163.65 258408 57488200 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING " 88.30 258409 84950600 5842.5515 -`COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 188.62 258410 84926600 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 102.71 258411 84950400 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 264.05 258419 57500500 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,417.40 258431 57488100 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING -30.13 258432 84950500 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 374.05 258780 . 57593100 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 230.20 258781 57597400 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 13.21 258782 84983100 5822.5515 COST,OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5,787.77 345529 313112011 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 414.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 258728 032511 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 414.00 345530 3/3112011 119213 BENTLEY, MACHELL 71.47 UNIFORM PURCHASE 258763 032811 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 71.47 345531 313112011 127366 .BERGERON, CHERE SUZETTE 540.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 258729 032511 5110.6103 ' PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 540.00 345532 3/3112011 12513.9 BERNICK'S WINE.. - J 780.00 258420 20339 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 780.00 345533 3/3112011 100648 BERTELSON'OFFICE PRODUCTS 114.40 FILE FOLDERS 258416 WO- 682673 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 27.76 OFFICE SUPPLIES 258417 WO- 682208 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ,.142.16 345534. 313112011 101296 BERTRAND, MIKE 300.34 TV AND STAND 258668 032311 5210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 300.34 345535 313112011 123329 BLOTZ, MOLLY 280.00 INSTRUCTOR'AC 258730 032511 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 280.00 i CITY OF EDINA 3/29/2011 11:22:20 R65CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 4 3/25/2011 - 3/31/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 345536 313112011 125266 BLUE COMPACTOR SERVICES 1.12- TAX PAID ON INV 329 258377 329REVISED 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 412.54 COMPACTOR RENTAL - MARCH 258378 374 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 411.42 345537 313112011 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 149.48 DESKTOP ORGANIZERS 00001437 258587 67297 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 306.26 OFFICE SUPPLIES 258588 66095 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 7.22 OFFICE SUPPLIES 258589 66963 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 10.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 258590 67098 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 30.92 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 258590 67098 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 504.65 345538 313112011 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 484.50 258433 102905 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 484.50 345539 313112011 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 94.14 PANEL 00005800 258525 499443 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 124.54 SENDER, TERMINALS 00005833 258526 501569 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 186.85 TANK, CONNECTORS 00005837 258591 502489 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 26.31 SENSOR ASSEMBLY 00005837 258592 502636 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 431.84 345540 313112011 100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY 1,603.13 POLY 00001572 258593 12072792 -00 5939.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STORM SEWER SPECIAL PROJECTS 1,603.13 345541 313112011 103244 BURTIS, ROBERT 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 258758 032411 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 345542 3/3112011 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 60.62 CAPS 258669 922285457 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 91.40 GOLF CLUB 258670 922290817 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 292.09 GOLF CLUB 258671 922292482 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 464.11 345543 313112011 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET 80.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 258731 032511 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY 180.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 258731 032511 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 260.00 CITY OF EDINA 3/29/2011 11:22:20 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 5 3125/2011 - 313112011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 345544 313112011 127600 CAPITAL MAINTENANCE SERVICES L 89.99 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 258672 86463 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 89.99 345545 313112011 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 237.50 258434 15528 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 161.70 258435 15514 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER BOTH ST SELLING 1,708.05 258436 15519 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,107.25 345546 313112011 100677 CARGILL INC. 14,909.37 ICE CONTROL SALT 00005710 258594 3122778 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 7,359.49 ICE CONTROL SALT 00005710 258595 3132821 1318.6525 SALT SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 22,268.86 -345647 3131/2011 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 425.00 258421 89544 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 480.00 258437 89554 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 905.00 345648 3131/2011 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 171.51 5596524 -8 258402 5596524 -3/11 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 171.51 345649 313112011 100884 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 8,891.80 LAB SERVICES 258673 MAR2011 5915.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER WATER TREATMENT 8,891.80 3.46550 313112011 118768 CITY OF MAPLE GROVE 300.00 POLICE CYCLIST COURSE 258764 032311 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 300.00 345551 3/31/2011 114548 CIZEK, DARIN 21.42 RIFLE SCOPE COVERS 258765 032511 1400.6551 AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 21.42 345552 3/31/2011 123941 CLAY, CAROL 201.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 258732 032511 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 201.00 345553 3131/2011 116304 CLAY, DON 3/29/2011 11:22:20 Page- 6 Business Unit MEDIA STUDIO 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE EDINBOROUGH PARK 3,050.36 METERS 00001596. 258529 6798792 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS PITY, OF EDINA_ 3,050.36 R55CKREG LOG20000 345560 313112011 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. - 940.90 Council Check Register 593294 5842.5514- COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 43.90 258440 3/25/2011 - 3/31/2011 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanatlon PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger, Account Description 275.63 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 258733 032511 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 275.63 345554 3/3112011 100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 171.00 258438 0128028326 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 203.00 258439 0128028624 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 374.00 345555 313112011 101119 COCKRIEL, VINCE 36.72 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 258674 031811 1600.6107 p MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 36.72 345556 3/3112011 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS - 67.23 SAFETY GLASSES, GLOVES 00005775' 258527 03875883 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT. 67.23 345557 3/3112011 128726 COTE, DARREL 98.68 UNIFORM PURCHASE 258528 032111 1301.6201 LAUNDRY 98.68 345558 313112011. 121267 CREATIVE RESOURCES 2,004.41 BIKE BOTTLES 258596 10994 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 2,004.41 345559 3/3112011 121618 DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 3/29/2011 11:22:20 Page- 6 Business Unit MEDIA STUDIO 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE EDINBOROUGH PARK 3,050.36 METERS 00001596. 258529 6798792 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR 3,050.36 345560 313112011 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. - 940.90 258422 593294 5842.5514- COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 43.90 258440 593292 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,267.00 - 258441 593293 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,251.80 345561 313112011 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 139.40 258675 650487671 -3/11 .5511.6188 TELEPHONE 96.80 258676 650243624 -3/11 5631.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 236.20 345562 313112011 123995 DICK'SILAKEVILLE SANITATION IN 519.30 REFUSE 258766 1216345 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,477.33 REFUSE 258767 1222775 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS' CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 50TH STREET RUBBISH 50TH STREET RUBBISH . CITY OF EDINA 3/29h3 1 11:22:20 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 7 3/2512011 —3/3112011 Check # Date Amount Supplier./ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3,996.63 345563 313112011 121546 DICK, KENNA 267.35 UNIFORM PURCHASE 258768 032811 1400.6203. UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 267.35 345564 313112011 121268 DIRR, ALEX 248.00 PT MAINTENANCE 258734 032511 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 248.00 345565 313112011 108648 DOAN, SIIRI 174.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 258735 032511 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 174.00 345566 3131/2011 119716 EASTERN PACIFIC APPAREL INC. 1,529.70 MERCHANDISE 258677 454242 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES " 29.00- CREDIT 258678 60425 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,500.70 345567 3/31/2011 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 64.70 WIRE- STRIPPER, ANCHOR KIT 00001563 258530 07903100 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 64.70 345568 3131/2011 101341 EDINA' FIREFIGHTER'S RELIEF ASS 1,000.00 STATE AID REIMBURSEMENT 258379 032111 1400.4218 POLICE AID 1% POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,000.00 345569 313112011 101630. EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 91.00 MAILING LABELS 258531 10938- 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 91.00 345570 3/3112011 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC. 81.47 O -RINGS 00001504 258532 0043739 -IN 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT . 81.47 345571_ 313112011 104004, ESSIG, CRAIG 3,189:74 TRAINING EXPENSES 258679 032211 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3,189.74 345572 3/3112011 127590 ETTERMAN ENTERPRISES 97.49 TERMINAL & LUG CRIMPER 00005784 258597 169213 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 97.49 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/2512011 - 3/31/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 345573 313112011 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 74.21 OXYGEN SENSOR 00005757 258598 69- 033898 1553.6530 5.23 HEATER HOSE 00005757 258599 69- 033785 1553.6530 56.44 DISTRIBUTOR CAP, HOSE 00005757 258600 1- 3597206 1553.6530 80.63 REGULATOR 00005757 258601 69- 033759 1553.6530 147.25 DISTRIBUTOR ROTOR, WIRE KIT 00005757 258602 69- 033874 1553.6530 40.30 CONNECTOR 00005757 258603 69- 033895 1553.6530 219.23 ROTORS, PAD KIT 00005757 258604 69- 033948 1553.6530 623.29 345574 3131/2011 100216 FARMER BROTHERS COFFEE 383.96 COFFEE 258533 54236374 5421.5510 383.96 345575 3131/2011 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 152.56 METER ADAPTERS 00001503 258534 S01295253.001 5913.6406 152.56 345676 313112011 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. 425.00 ROWAY 258605 21341 1260.6103 425.00 345577 313112011 103985 FLOR, JON 125.00 EDINA LIQUOR AD DESIGN 258535 2235 2210.6103 125.00 345578 313112011 101475 FOOTJOY 855.45 SHOES 258680 3610938 5440.5511 855.45 345579 3/3112011 105158 FRANKLIN, ELIZABETH 400.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 258736 032511 5110.6103 400.00 345580 313112011 103039 FREY, MICHAEL 2,106.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 258737 032511 5110.6103 2,106.00 345581 3/3112011 100764 G & K SERVICES 77.27 SHOP TOWELS 258536 1006855661 5422.6201 77.27 SHOP TOWELS 258537 1006877555 5422.6201 Subledger Account Description REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES 3/29/2011 11:22:20 Page- 8 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GRILL DISTRIBUTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LAUNDRY LAUNDRY PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CITY OF EDINA 3129 /'cc . , 11:22:20 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 3/2512011 --3/3112011 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger -Account Description Business Unit 154.54 3455821 313112011 127385 GARAGE DOOR STORE 1,045.15 DOOR SECTION 00005871 258538 17950 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,045.15 345583 313112011 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 1,043.66 APPAREL 258606 11459319 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,043.66 - 345584 3/3112011 104652 GILLIS, LOUISE 600.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 258738 032511 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 600.00 345585 313112011 118265 GLOVE IT _ 237.51 MERCHANDISE 258681 35161 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 237.51 345586 3/3112011 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 742.40 NOV 2010 TICKETS 258607 0110488 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION " 742.40 345587 3/31/2011 101103 GRAINGER 23.64 DOOR CHIME KIT 00001569 258539 9483713153 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 144.28 SCREWDRIVERS, TOOL POUCH 00001569 258539 9483713153 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 51.98 BALLASTS 00002283 258608 9482850618 5620.6406 GENERAL. SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 219.90 345688 313112011 124711 GRANDVIEW .TIRE & AUTO - CAHILL 109.95 ALIGNMENT 00005878 258609 22980 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 109.95 345589 3131/2011 120201 GRANICUS INC. 180.00 WEBSTREAMING -APR 258540 25386 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 180.00 i 345590 313112011 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 98.25 258442 128021 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING. 244.50 256443 128020 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 114.25- 258444 127859 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 228.50 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/25/2011 —3/31/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 345591 313112011 102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES 1,033.00 MERCHANDISE 258682 43782 5440.5511 1,033.00 345592 313112011 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 10,980.00 2ND QTR RETAINER 258769 033011 5410.6132 10,980.00 345593 313112011 100155 GRITTON, KAY 168.00 INSTRUCTION 258739 032511 5120.6103 168.00 345594 313112011 104459 GS DIRECT INC. 56.54 OCE PAPER 258610 276904 1495.6406 56.54 345595 313112011 128775 H.A. SHELDON CANADA LTD. 361.00 MERCHANDISE 258683 32822 5440.5511 361.00 345596 313112011 125270 HARTFORD 5,123.04 APR 2011 PREMIUM 258684 5306048 -9 9900.2033.05 9,520.44 JAN - FEB - MAR 2011 258685 5245992 -2 9900.2033.16 6.65 007739140009 COBRA 258686 032811 1550.6043 14,650.13 345597 3/31/2011 100797 HAWKINS INC. 2,654.25 CHEMICALS 00001216 258611 3206490 5915.6586 2,654.25 345598 3/3112011 106062 HAYNES, STEPHEN 30.00 SUPPLIES 258740 032511 5125.6564 150.00 INSTRUCTION 258740 032511 5125.6103 180.00 345599 313112011 103838 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 95.00 COMMERCIAL VEHICLE CLASS 00005573 258541 00227786 1281.6104 95.00 345600 313112011 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 273.48 MOPS, TOWELS 00002287 258612 6672143 5620.6511 26.58 SCRUBBER PARTS 00002282 258613 6670963 5620.6511 3/29/2011 11:22:20 Page - 10 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES LIFE INSURANCE - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT CRAFT SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/2912011 11:22:20 Council Check Register Page - 11 3/25/2011 -- 3/31/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 205.13 CLEANERS 00002285 258614 6670962 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 505.19 63,039.17 FREIGHTLINGER CAB & CHASSIS 00001593 258380 V242003340 421650.6710 345601 3131/2011 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 63,039.17 639.50 313112011 258445 553806 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 235.00 258446 553326 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 649.46 258447 553693 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPLIES STORM SEWER SPECIAL PROJECTS GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH:ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 345609 313112011 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1.12 258452 1020796 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLDWINE YORK SELLING 216.24 258453 1022885 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS$OLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 91.07 258454 1022889 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,523.96 345602 313112011 121404 ISTATE TRUCK CENTER 63,039.17 FREIGHTLINGER CAB & CHASSIS 00001593 258380 V242003340 421650.6710 63,039.17 345603 313112011 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 338.21 VALVES, NIPPLES 00001470 258542 646637 5912.6406 338.21 345604 313112011 119808 INTEGRA TELECOM 304.74 PHONEIINTERNET 258687 8084086 7411.6188 304.74 345605 3/3112011 128768 JACOBS TRADING COMPANY 4,515.47 SAND BAGS. 00001214 258615 1048242 5939.6406 4,515.47 345606 3131/2011 100202 JAMAR TECHNOLOGIES INC. 52.88 ROUND CHINESE FINGERS 00001573 258616 03442 1260.6406 52.88 346607 3131/2011 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 78.10 258423 1481383 5842.5515 8,972.62 258424 1481382 5842.5514 290.75 258448 1481378 5822.5514 23.95 258449 1516646 5822.5514 2,573.17 258450 1509949 5842.5514 3.616.20 258451 1509897 5862.5514 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPLIES STORM SEWER SPECIAL PROJECTS GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH:ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 345609 313112011 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1.12 258452 1020796 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLDWINE YORK SELLING 216.24 258453 1022885 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS$OLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 91.07 258454 1022889 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register. 3/25/2011 - 3/31/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No 683.51 258455 1022900, 57.05 258456 1021043 3,064.95 258457 1022898 3,304.98 258458. 1022901 1.12 258459 1022892 2,200.57 258460 1022886 1,941.86 258461 1022899 7.92- 258462 491246 4.14- 258463 491244 15.16- 258464 491245 66.24 258465. '491349 57.05 258783 1021042 478.66 258784 1022880 44.22 258785 1022882 2,008.27 258786 1022895 3,408.12 258787 . 1022897 1,087.47 258788 1022881 1.12 258789 1022894 2.24 258790 1022891 692.58 258791 1022883 157.63 258792 1022888 1,193.72 258793 1022884 , 327.56 258794" 1022887 456.72 258795 1022890 1,000.00- 258796 489624 853.00- 258796 489624 200.00- 258796 489624 30.07 258797 1023104 419.40 258798 1023103 2,881.83 258799 1022896 7,312.07 258800 1022893 24.46- 258801 491243 11.67- 258802 491239 2.98- 258803 491240 7.63- 258804 491241 8.48- 258805 491089 6.88- 258806 491242 6.10- 258807 491527 29,906.54 345610 313112011 103230 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVICE Account No 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 . 5842.5513 5842.5512 5842.5512 -, 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5515 5842.5513 5822.5512 5822.5512 - 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5513 5862.5513 5842.5513 5822.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5513 3/29/2011 11:22:20 Page - 12 I Subledger Account Description I I Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD.LI000R i VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF 60ODS'SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF: GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR LYORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE _- YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE '.YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/29/2011 11:22:20 Council Check Register Page - 13 - 3/25/2011 - 3/31/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 26.66 VACUUM BAGS 258381 112535 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 53.34 VACUUM BAGS 258381 112535 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY - 80.00 345611 313112011 116901 K.C. GROVES TREE EXPERTS 1,793.40 TREE REMOVAL 00001411 258391 3100 W 60TH 4088.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREE REMOVAL 1,793.40 S 345612, 313112011 122239 KANDIKO, GEORGIA . 75.00 . INSTRUCTION AC 258741 032511 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION • 75.00 345613 313112011 102080 KATTREH, ANN 373.40 AIRFARE REIMBURSEMENT 258688 032511 5621.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION' 373.40 345614 313112011 100536 KATZJAMES, GAIL 100,00 INSTRUCTOR AC 258742 032511 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 100.00 345616 3/3112011 128837 KEY, DERRICK 38.00 GLOBETROTTERS REFUND 258760 032511 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 38.00 345616 313112011 100198. KIRCHMAN, STEVE A. 51.76 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 258382 032211 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 51.76 346617 3/3112011 101340 .KOCHENASH, RICK 363.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 258743 032511 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 363.00 345618 313112011 105887 KOESSLER, JOE 336.00 FEB & MARCH FEES 258543 030111 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS ' 336.00 345619 3/31/2011 122515 KOPLOS, GERALD 6.40 COFFEE DISHES 258689 032211 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 43.11 FILE CABINET 258689 032211 7410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ` PSTF ADMINISTRATION 49.51 345620 3/31/2011 106094 KOUTSKY, DEAN CITY OF EDINA 3/29/2011 11:22:20 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 14 3/25/2011 - 3/31/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 504.00 INSTRUCTION 258744 032511 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 504.00 345621 313112011 118958 L.E.A. DATA TECHNOLOGIES 30.00 SOFTWARE UPGRADE 258770 032311 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 30.00 345622 313112011 100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 24.10 UNIFORM SHIRTS 258617 09919734 1495.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS INSPECTIONS 65.00 UNIFORM SHIRTS 258618 09956839 1495.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS INSPECTIONS 89.10 345623 3/3112011 128776 LASERLINE MFG INC 2,008.44 LASER ASSEMBLY, BOX, CONNECT070001564 258690 1997 1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 2,008.44 345624 313112011 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 563.22 FITTINGS, HOSE ENDS, PINS 00005805 258619 0280452 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 355.56 WASHERS 00001566 258620 0271479 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 918.78 345625 313112011 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 60.00 SAFETY S LOSS CONTROL WORKSBO]F01595 258544 150279 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 60.00 345626 3/3112011 116575 LIFE LINE INC. 49.00 FIRST AID TRAINING 00001219 258545 LL -3690 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 49.00 FIRST AID TRAINING 00001219 258545 LL -3690 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL 294.00 FIRST AID TRAINING 00001219 258545 LL -3690 1640.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 588.00 FIRST AID TRAINING 00001219 258545 LL -3690 1240.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL 980.00 345627 313112011 124810 LIFT BRIDGE BEER COMPANY 130.00 258466 10728 5642.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 130.00 345628 313112011 122472 M & I BANK 19.67 FACILITY EXPENSES 258691 031411 7414.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC PROGRAMS 33.22 FACILITY EXPENSES 258691 031411 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 43.32 FACILITY EXPENSES 258691 031411 7410:6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PSTF ADMINISTRATION 47.04 FACILITY EXPENSES 258691 031411 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 179.75 FACILITY EXPENSES 258691 031411 7414.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC PROGRAMS CITY OF EDINA 11:22:20 -- R55CKREG LOG20000 .3129/2011 Council Check Register Page - 15 3/25/2011 - 3/31/2011 r Check # Date Amount ` Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 323.00 345629 3/31/2011 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP .. 1,567.09 258808 105692 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING ,1,567.09 _ 345630 313112011 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIP INC. 32.30 BELT SCRAPER 00005803 258546 2112220 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 32.30 345631 3/3112011 122878 MARTTI; DOROTHEA 500.00 HOSTING FEE 258547 155 2210.61D3 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 500.00 _ 345632 313112011 101146 MATRIX 222.65 258621 607764444 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 222.65 345633 3131/2011 126839 MCDONALD, LILLIAN 500.00 HOSTING FEE 258548 031711 2210.6103. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 500.00 _. 345634 313112011 101483 MENARDS 29.48 STOWAWAYS, CA_ R WASH FLUID 00000146 258392 40277 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 43.89 WIRE °SHELVING 00001412 258393 37824 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 162.73 NYLON BRUSHES, PAINT, LINERS 00001413 258394 37840 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 45.69 SHELF BRACKETS, TEXTURE 00001412 258395 37718 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 29.92 BUILDING SUPPLIES 00001410 258396 35326 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 36.33 EXTENSION CORDS; PAINT 00006412 258549 40171 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 150.24 CEILING TILES 00006414 258550 40591 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 108.30 POST MOUNTS 00001458 258551 31674 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 24.78 CROWN MOULDING,. LUMBER 258622 40207 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE - -9.99 POOL RAINBOW SPRAY 00001554 258623 35639 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 62.67 LUMBER, CLEANING SUPPLIES 00001574'258624 40208 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 2.99 TILE 258625 39765 5860,6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 19.96 SCREWS 00001465 258627 34537 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL " 20.58- CREDIT 258662 39764 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES %..: VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 706.39 345635 3131/2011 101987 ' MENARDS - 47.83 LIGHT FIXTURE, BULBS 00002007 258692 72303 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 240.76 SUMP PUMPS 00002012 258693 72289 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES CITY OF EDINA 312912011 11:22:20 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 16 3/25/2011 - 3/31/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Suhledger Account Description Business Unit 36.36 PLANTING SUPPLIES 00002021 258694 73459 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 324.95 345636 313112011 104156 MENARDS 37.46 PAINT, BATTERIES, GRATES 00002012 258695 44508 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 37.46 345637 313112011 128836 MERTZ, RYANN 38.00 GLOBETROTTERS REFUND 258761 032511 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 38.00 345638 3131/2011 100041 METRO CISM 75.00 TRAINING CONFERENCE 258771 032311 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 300.00 TRAINING CONFERENCE 258771 032311 1419.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS RESERVE PROGRAM 375.00 345639 313112011 102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 275.00 OFFICIATING FEES 258552 3933 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 275.00 345640 3/3112011 127263 MID AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTEMS 278.54 STACKING BINS 00001205 258553 716241 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT 214.89 SHELVING 00001195 258554 716249 421650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT 493.43 - 345641 313112011 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 301.82 SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL 258383 30834 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 720.33 SUPPLIES FOR CITY HALL 258383 30834 1551.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 1,022.15 345642 313112011 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 5.34 WINDOW CLEANING 258384 921082209 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 16.03 WINDOW CLEANING 258385 921082208 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY 21.37 345643 3/31/2011 118066 MINNESOTA REVENUE 264.00 MPCA ANNUAL FEE 258696 2200077977 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 264.00 345644 313112011 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 2,304.16 FERTILIZER, FUNGICIDE 258555 775234 -00 5630.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES 660.06 FLAGS, PINS, CUPS 00002011 258556 775245 -00 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/25/2011 - 3/31/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No, Account No Subledger Account Description DUES &SUBSCRIPTIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CUSTOMER REFUND 3/29/2011 11:22:20 Page - 17 Business Unit CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION MEDIA STUDIO UTILITY BALANCE SHEET SIGNS 8 POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 2,964.22 STREET NAME SIGNS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES REPAIR PARTS - 345645 313112011 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 100916 MUZAK LLC 231.43 MUSIC SERVICE 258557 Al 16301 5631.6105 231.43 345646 313112011 106334 NELSON, PEGGY 99.00 INSTRUCTION 258745 032511 5125.6103 99.00 345647 3/31/2011 128681 NEWELL, JAMES 26.87 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 258403 6316 PEACEDALE 5900.2015 " AVE 26.87 345648 3/3112011 100922 NEWMAN TRAFFIC SIGNS 2,674.56 BRACKETS, PARTS FOR SIGNS 00001457 258558 TI- 0232218 1325.6531 2,245.98 SIGNS 00001457 258559 TI- 0232238 1325.6531 4,920.54 345649 3131/2011 104350 NIKE USA INC. 423.90 MERCHANDISE 258697 932165008 5440.5511 423.90 345650 3/3112011 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 16.01 MOUNT KITS 00005799 258560 26982 1553.6530 357.60 LINEAR TIR LEDS 00005799 258561 26991 1553.6530 373.61 345651 313112011 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY CO. 310.65 WATER COLORS', PENS 00009165 258698 40160200 5120.5510 310.65 345652 3/3112011 116114 OCE 59.18 FEB MAINTENANCE 258628 987383800 1552.6103 81.00 MAR MAINTENANCE 00001229 258629 987406684 1552.6103 122.31 MAR MAINTENANCE 258630 987404008 1495.6103 262.49 1 345653 313112011 100729 ODLAND, DOROTHY 276.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 258746 032511 5110.6103 276.00 DUES &SUBSCRIPTIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CUSTOMER REFUND 3/29/2011 11:22:20 Page - 17 Business Unit CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION MEDIA STUDIO UTILITY BALANCE SHEET SIGNS 8 POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS SIGNS 8 POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING i INSPECTIONS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CITY OF EDINA 3/2912011 11:22:20 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 18 3/25/2011 - 3/31/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 345664 3/3112011 103678 OFFICE DEPOT 11.49 SOAP 00002005 258562 555161604001 5631.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 35.26 SHREDDER 258631 .555761289001 5621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 652.45 TONER 258632 555761432001 5621:6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 699.20 345665 313112011 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 159.40 CHAIN FOR TRACTORS 00001400 258397 628843 1648.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 159.40 345656 313112011 101439- OLSEN FIRE INSPECTION 385.00 FIRE SYSTEM INSPECTION 00006252 258633 -21102241 5210.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 385.00 345657 313112011 120855 OLSON, VICKI - 7.14 MEETING EXPENSES 258699 032411 1160.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE FINANCE 40.00 MEETING EXPENSES 258699 032411 1.160.6106 MEETING EXPENSE FINANCE 47.14 345658 313112011 101659 'ORKIN PEST CONTROL - 119.40 PEST CONTROL 258418 - 63248756 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 119.40 345659 313112011 128838 PARIS LAS VEGAS 1,001.28 CONFERENCE LODGING 258772 032711 2310.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS E911 1,001.28 345660 313112011 102440 PASS, GRACE 526.97 INSTRUCTOR AC 258747 032511 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 696.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 258747 032511 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY 1,222.97 345661 313112011 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1,037.76 258467 8298504 -1N 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 962.50 258468 8298439 -IN 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 371.75 258469 8298506 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 481.25 258470 8298389 -IN 5822.5512• COST OF GOODS SOLD..LI000R 50TH ST SELLING 876.25 258471 8298501 =1N 5642.5513 , COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,443.75 258472 8298387 -IN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,173.26 3129/2011 11:22:20 Page - 19 Business Unit GOLF DOME PROGRAM YORK SELLING 76.12 258412 2042639 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,231.25 258473 2045282 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,199.57 CITY OF EDINA 258474 R55CKREG LOG20000 5862.5513 741.84 258475 2045283 Council Check Register 1.12 3/25/2011 - 3/31/2011 2045277 Check # Date . Amount Supplier/ Explanation - PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 345662 3131/2011 2045275 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 57.12 413.22 258811 258773 59877657 5210.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 297.70 170.99 258809 70494533 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 2045278 710.92 - 3,165.06 345663 3131/2011 258813 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 5842.5513 3129/2011 11:22:20 Page - 19 Business Unit GOLF DOME PROGRAM YORK SELLING 76.12 258412 2042639 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,231.25 258473 2045282 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF. GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE. COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX. COST OF GOODS SOLD.WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS POSTAGE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,199.57 258474 2045284 5862.5513 741.84 258475 2045283 5862.5512 1.12 258476 2045277 5862.5512 483.74 258810 2045275 5822.5513 57.12 258811 2045276 5822.5515 170.99 258812 2045278 5822.5513 - 3,165.06 258813 2045279 5842.5513 1,780.59 258814 2045281 5842.5513 1,007.89 258815 2045280 5842.5512 1.12 258816 2045274 5842.5512 9;916.41 345664 313112011 100119 PING 121.29 GOLF BAG 258700 10614591 5440.5511 213.06 GOLF CLUB 258701 10617454 5440.5511 154.93 DISPLAY BAG 258702 10619322 5440.6406 489.28 345665 3/3112011 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 307.20 258817 11979 5842.5515 307.20 - 345666 313112011 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 581.71 TIRES 00005832 258564 300918 - .1553.6583 581.71 1 345667 3/3112011 100961' POSTMASTER - USPS 6,127.66 ABOUT TOWN POSTAGE 258634 032411 2210.6123 6,127.66 345668 313112011 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 220.00 POSTAGE 258748 032511 5110.6235 220.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF. GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE. COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX. COST OF GOODS SOLD.WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS POSTAGE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/25/2011 - 3/31/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 345669 3/3112011 101811 PREMIER FLEET SERVICES 1,585.00 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005574 258565 21276 1553.6180 1,585.00 345670 313112011 105690 PRO -TEC DESIGN INC. 4,760.46 INSTALL CAMERAS 258703 57443 7411.6103 4,760.46 345671 3/3112011 100971 QUALITY WINE 106.60 258477 434651 -CO 5822.5514 2,095.70 258478 434591 -00 5862.5512 678.11 258479 434592 -00 5822.5512 1,019.60 258480 434649 -00 5862.5513 889.19 258481 434613 -00 5862.5513 1,050.00 258482 434648 -00 5842.5513 35.60 258483 434648 -CO 5842.5513 733.37 258484 434612 -00 5842.5513 1,520.50 258485 434590 -00 5842.5512 686.66 258486 434576 -00 5822.5513 464.40 258487 434650 -00 5822.5513 150.00- 258488 427830 -00 5842.5513 150.00- 258488 427830 -00 5862.5513 121.26- 258489 429218 -00 5862.5513 8,858.47 345672 313112011 126424 QUINN, MATTHEW 180.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 258749 032511 5110.6103 180.00 345673 3/31/2011 100974 RAYMOND HAEG PLUMBING 763.50 ' ROOF /DRAINS REPAIRS 00001583 258430 12694 5861.6180 763.50 345674 313112011 122005 REALM PROMOTIONS 2,577.38 PLAYING CARDS 258566 8765FINAL 2210.6575 2,577.38 346675 313112011 102221 RECYCLING ASSOC OF MINNESOTA 75.00 MEMBERSHIP - SOLVEI WILMOT 258386 9041 5952.6105 75.00 346676 3/3112011 126343 RICHFIELD DQ GRILL AND CHILL Subledger Account Description CONTRACTED REPAIRS 3/2912011 11:22:20 Page - 20 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING_ 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS PRINTING DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS VERNON OCCUPANCY COMMUNICATIONS RECYCLING CITY OF EDINA 3/29/2011 11:22:20 R55CKREG LOG20000 . Council Check Register Page - 21 3/25/2011 - 3/31/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledgerr Account Description Business Unit 229.76 DILLY BARS, CAKES 258635 548 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 180.50 DILLY BARS 258636 549 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 410.28 345677 313112011 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 185.00 LEAK REPAIR 258567 56935 1470.6180 CONTRACTED. REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 185.00 345678 3131/2011 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 36.20 SOFTENER SALT 00003648 258638 00248904 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 36.20 _ 345679 313112011 102614 ROTARY.CLUB OF EDINA 240.00 DUES - SCOTT NEAL 258704 486 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 240.00 _ 345680 313112011 100987 SA -AG INC 708.77 SAND 00001207 258639 70019 5939.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STORM SEWER SPECIAL PROJECTS 1,068.35 SAND 00001207 258640 70001 5939.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STORM SEWER SPECIAL PROJECTS 675.76 SAND 00001207 258641 69978 5939.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STORM SEWER SPECIAL PROJECTS 2,452.86 345681 313112011 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 163.87 BRAKE CLEANER- 00005875 258568 53351206 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 346.96 PARTS WASHER SERVICE 258569 53353949 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 510.83 345682 3/3112011 124780 SCHAUER, LAUREN 720.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 256750 032511 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION - 720.00 345683 3/3112011 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 54.91 SCREWS, BITS 00001630 258642 40915724 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 54.91 ` 346684 3/31/2011 101961 SCHMITZ, THOMAS • 52.70 GASOLINE REIMBURSEMENT 258643 032311 1470.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 52.70 345685 313112011 124792 SCHUELLER, JASON 249.04 UNIFORM PURCHASE 258570 032111 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 249.04 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/25/2011 — 3/31/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 345686 313112011 YORK SELLING 100995 SEH VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 12,495.60 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 258644 241231 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 13,267.53 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 258644 241231 26,715.99 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 258644 241231 27,258.75 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 258644 241231 773.74 RIDGE ROAD RECON 258645 241230 1,289.57 RIDGE ROAD RECON 258645 241230 8,769.07 RIDGE ROAD RECON 258645 241230 14,959.00 RIDGE ROAD RECON 258645 241230 4,997.21 WHPP UPDATE 258646 241238 110,526.46 345687 313112011 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 540.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 258751 032511 1,120.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 258751 032511 1,660.00 345688 3/3112011 100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 178.00 PAINT 00001405 258398 9712 -4 178.00 345689 313112011 118211 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 90.99 PAINT 00001561 258647 4741 -1 90.99 345690 313112011 121382 SIGNATURE AQUATICS 265.00 AFO POOL OPERATOR CLASS 00002274 258648 1030 265.00 345691 313112011 105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 380.00 ALARM REPAIR 258571 66405218 380.00 345692 3131/2011 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 235.50 258425 1518532 120.50 258490 1518533 1,084.50 258491 1519271 117.90 258492 1519174 1,444.50 258492 1519174 1,753.50 258493 1519272 1,458.50 258818 1497784 03460.1705.20 04375.1705.20 05511.1705.20 01334.1705.20 03461.1705.20 05510.1705.20 01384.1705.20 04374.1705.20 5913.6103 5110.6103 5112.6103 1646.6406 1335.6532 5621.6105 1470.6180 5842.5513 5862.5513 5822.5513 5862.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 5842.5513 Subledger Account Description CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES PAINT DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 3/29/2011 11:22:20 Page- 22 Business Unit MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON BA -334 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON SS-461 RIDGE RD RECONSTRUCTION WM -510 RIDGE RD RECONSTRUCTION RIDGE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION STS -374 RIDGE ROAD DISTRIBUTION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER POTTERY BUILDING MAINTENANCE PAVEMENT MARKINGS EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3/29/2011 11:22:20 Page - 23 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES TELEPHONE TELEPHONE . TELEPHONE SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL PUBLIC HEALTH YORK OCCUPANCY CENT SERV GEN - MIS ASSESSING PSTF OCCUPANCY PLANNING 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE INSPECTIONS ENGINEERING GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL EDINBOROUGH PARK GENERAL (BILLING) POLICE DEPT. GENERAL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL DISTRIBUTION 1 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 3/25/2011 - 3/31/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 6,214.90 345693 313112011 103273 SOUTHSIDE BIG BAND 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 4110/11 258759 032411 5621.6136 150.00 345694 313112011 110977 SOW, ADAMA 798.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 258752 032511 5110.6103 1,023.00 CLEANING /MAINTENANCE 258752 032511 5111.6103 1,821.00 345695 3/3112011 120974 SPORTCOVER INTERNATIONAL INC. ' 257.12 DIVOT TOOLS, HAT CLIPS 00006198 258774 581157 5440.5511 257.12 345696 3131/2011 104672 SPRINT 7.36 258376 873184124 -100 1240.6188 51.28 258376 873184124 -100 1490.6188 52.13 258376 873184124 -100 5841.6188 52.56 258376 873184124 -100 1554.6230 53.52 258376 873184124 -100 1190.6188 55.66 258376 873184124 -100 7411.6188 56.62 258376 - 873184124 -100 1140.6188 83.72 258376 873184124 -100 4090.6188 86.25 258376 873184124 -100 1120.6188 113.25 258376 873184124 -100 2210.6188 120.06 258376 873184124 -100 1553.6188 132.02 258376 873184124 -100 5422.6188 138.46 258376 873184124 -100 1322.6188 227.68 258376 873184124 -100 1470.6188 270.01 258376 873184124 -100 1301.6188 309.58 258376 .873184124 -100 1495.6188 322.21 258376 873184124 -100, 1260.6188 380.88 258376 873184124 -100 1640.6188 411.33 258376 873184124 -100 5620.6188 589.26 258376 873184124 -100. 5910.6188 1,715.81 258376 873184124 -100 1460.6188 39.99 DATA CARDS 258572 666109817 -040 1322.6188 39.99 DATA CARDS 258572 666109817 -040 5913.6188 5,309.63 345697 3/3112011 101004 SPS COMPANIES 3/29/2011 11:22:20 Page - 23 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES TELEPHONE TELEPHONE . TELEPHONE SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL PUBLIC HEALTH YORK OCCUPANCY CENT SERV GEN - MIS ASSESSING PSTF OCCUPANCY PLANNING 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE ADMINISTRATION COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE INSPECTIONS ENGINEERING GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL EDINBOROUGH PARK GENERAL (BILLING) POLICE DEPT. GENERAL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL DISTRIBUTION 1 CITY OF EDINA -_ _ 3/29/2011 11:22:20 RSSCKREG LOG20000 „ _. Council Check Register Page - 24 3/25/2011 - 3131/2011 I Check # Date Amount - Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 14.25 PVC PIPE 00001459 258399 52333723.002 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 14.25 345698 313112011 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC. " 1,157.46 SKIDSTEER LOADER FORKS 00005575 258649. SM10465 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT 2,298.88 SKIDSTEER SNOW BLOWER - 00001354 258650.: - SM10464 421305.6710 .' EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT 3,456.34 '1 345699 3131/2011 128314 STEINBICKER, WILLIAM 55.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 258753 032511 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 55.00 345700 313112011 128728 STEWARTSIGNS. 1,914.86 SIGN REPAIRS 00003520 258573 34028. 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,914.86 345701 3/3112011 106452 - STONE, HOLLY 864.00 . INSTRUCTOR AC 258754 032511 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 864.00 345702 313112011 112668 STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC. 130.39 PLOW.SIDE HARNESS 00005809 258651 .18654- 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 130.39 J 34.5703 3/31/2011 101015 STREICHERS 208.41 UNIFORMS 00003537 258574 1822322 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 208.41 345704 313112011 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 391.69 VEHICLE REPAIRS, 258575 588467 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 40.59 HANDLE 00005839 '258652 306419 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 997.65 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005882 258653 588537 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 748.13- CREDIT 00005700 258654 CM301366 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 661.80 345705 313112011 101336 SULLIVAN, MONICA 785.00 INSTRUCTION- 258755 032511 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 785.00 345706 313112011 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 233.33 EDINA LIQUOR AD 258387 1306105 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 233.33 EDINA LIQUOR AD 258387 1306105 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING e R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3129/2011 11:22:20 Council Check Register Page - 25 3/25/2011 - 3/31/2011 ' Check # Date Amount. Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 233.34 EDINA LIQUOR AD 258387 1306105 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 700.00 345707 3/31/2011 120998., SURLY BREWING CO. 892.00 258520 MVP00788 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 892.00 345708 3131/2011 120595 T- MOBILE 42.46 .SURVEY PHONE 258655 022711 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 42.46 345709 313112011 101027 TARGET BANK - 306.74 X- XXX -XX9 -840 SUPPLIES 258656. 031811 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 306.74 345710 313112011 104932 TAYLOR MADE. • 275.67 MERCHANDISE- 258717 15337409 5440.5511 COST OF: GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 254.76 MERCHANDISE 258718 15340063 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 281.30 MERCHANDISE 258719 15340062 5440.5511 COST,OF'GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 157.80 MERCHANDISE 258720 15340064 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 77.00 MERCHANDISE 258721 15353269 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,490.00 MERCHANDISE 258722 15367492 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS'- PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 558.00 MERCHANDISE 258723 15367493 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 884.06 MERCHANDISE 258724 15371428 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 315.60 MERCHANDISE 258725 15379149 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5,294.19 345711 313112011 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 1,825.10 258494 632304 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 113.20 258495 632305 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 117.00 258819 00740230 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,055.30 345712 3/3112011 101474 TITLEIST 516.00 GOLF BALLS 258576 2366856 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS -- PRO SHOP _ PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 126.42 GOLF BAG 258705 2344079 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 965.63 MERCHANDISE 258706 2375587 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 192.46 GOLF BALLS 258707 237 -1894 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 252.00 GOLF BALLS 258708 2377573 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 467.64 MERCHANDISE 258709 2379754 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 104.52 UMBRELLA, TOWELS 258710 2384628 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,624.67 3/29/2011 11:22:20 Page - 26 Subledger Account Description Business Unit WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TREES & MAINTENANCE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE TELEPHONE GRILL RECYCLING PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 3/25/2011 — 3/31/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 345713 3/3112011 101036 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 251.74 WELDING WIRE 00005802 258577 342594 1553.6580 251.74 345714 313112011 101693 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS 25.01 CARD READER CLEAN CARDS 258388 26395 5840.6406 25.01 345715 313112011 128836 TOWN & COUNTRY CLEANING CO. IN 7,059.09 WINDOW CLEANING 258775 W311270 1551.6180 7,059.09 345716 3/3112011 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 647.61 BOLTS, SPRINGS 00005877 258578 S125862 1553.6530 647.61 345717 313112011 102104 UNDIS, PAT 65.00 ART WORK SOLD 258756 032511 5101.4413 801.13 SUPPLIES 258756 032511 5110.6564 1,809.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 258756 032511 5110.6103 2,675.13 345718 313112011 101063 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 35.74 RHINO LABEL 00001632 258657 013101 1322.640E 35.74 346719 3131/2011 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 330.00 SHADE TREE SHORT COURSE 00001392 258400 1392 1644.6104 330.00 345720 3131/2011 119476 USPCA REGION 12 200.00 K9 CERTIFICATION TRIALS 258776 032311 1400.6104 200.00 345721 313112011 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 1,337.43 LINERS, CUPS, TOWELS 258658 192180 -00 5421.640E 1,337.43 345722 3/3112011 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 32.73 258389 2543073613 5952.618E 40.78 258389 2543073613 1640.618E 3/29/2011 11:22:20 Page - 26 Subledger Account Description Business Unit WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TREES & MAINTENANCE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE TELEPHONE GRILL RECYCLING PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/25/2011 — 3/31/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description. ' 313112011 67.41 258389 2543073613 1495.6188 TELEPHONE ' 77.79. 258389 2543073613 1120.6188 TELEPHONE 97.01 258389 2543073613 1600.6188 TELEPHONE 345727 3131/2011 286.98 258389 2543073613 1470.6188 TELEPHONE 602.70 258497 0037166 -IN 5822.5513 345723 313112011 202.64 101083 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 345728 313112011 1,884.89 CART ENGINE 00006413 258579 53210 5431.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,884.89 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 258757 032511 5125.6103 345724 3/31/2011 144.00 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 345729 3/31/2011 86.68 CORD CONNECTOR 00001570 258580 5265287 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,225.00 86.68 258659 21369400002 1375.6103 345725 3131/2011 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 345730 3131/2011 412.39 SAFETY SUPPLIES 00001415 258401 266573 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 3/29/2011 11:22:20 Page - 27 Business Unit HUMINIA I "I IUN PARK ADMIN. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL' RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 412.39 50TH ST SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 345728 313112011 PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 125327 VINOANDES 572.35 258496 WEB000071 5842.5513 572.35 345727 3131/2011 119454 VINOCOPIA 202.64 258497 0037166 -IN 5822.5513 202.64 345728 313112011 121611 VON BARGEN, AMY 144.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTION 258757 032511 5125.6103 144.00 345729 3/31/2011 102542 WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS INC 1,225.00 RAMP CERTIFICATION 258659 21369400002 1375.6103 1,225.00 345730 3131/2011 125444 WENTINK, JESSICA 38.00 GLOBETROTTERS REFUND 258762 032511 1600.4390.15 38.00: . 345731 313112011 101078 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT 778.32 RAMP REPAIR 00005874 258581 0042590 -IN 1552.6530 778.32 3/29/2011 11:22:20 Page - 27 Business Unit HUMINIA I "I IUN PARK ADMIN. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL' RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 3/25/2011 -3/3112011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 345732 313112011 128777 WHEELING PARK COMMISSION 2,193.24 DIRECTORS SCHOOL - ANN KATTREED02288 258711 NRPA 5621.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 2.193.24 3/29/2011 11:22:20 Page- 28 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 345733 3/3112011 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 741.20 258498 265599 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,140.50 258499 265567 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 621.90 258500 265436 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,503.60 345734 3/3112011 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 526.16 258501 355828 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING 608.48 258502 355831 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,081.20 258503 355829 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,810.28 258820 355830 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 246.72 258821 355827 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 15.88- 258822 52823 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,256.96 345735 313112011 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 1,673.50 258413 545126 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8.00- 258414 826200 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 8,197.48 258504 546687 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,288.30 258505 546688 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 11,012.35 258506 546692 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,758.43 258507 546694 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 67.54 258508 546691 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,094.72 258508 546691 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,810.36 258509 546690 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 503.30 258510 544347 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 147.20 258511 546693 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 39.29- 258512 826523 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 65.10- 258513 826524 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 40.00- 258514 826056 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 31.96- 258515 826430 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 755.00- 258516 825889 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 369.00- 258516 825889 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 126.00- 258516 825889 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,500.00- 258517 824339 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,100.00- 258517 824339 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 282.74- 258517 824339 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 378.00- 258823 826362 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 3/29/2011 11:22:20 Council Check Register Page - 29 3/25/2011 — 3/31/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 27,858.09 ' 345736 3/31/2011 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 2,205.40 258426 726081 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 21.50 258427 726082 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,697.60 258428 725261 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 28.80 258429 725262 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 21.50 258518 725072 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,885.80 258519 725071 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,244.56 258824 727774 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 740.85 258825 727572 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,146.10 258826 727571 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 8,992.21 345737 313112011 122046 WOMEN IN LEISURE SERVICES 30.00 SUPERVISOR WORKSHOP 258777 032811 1600.6104 CONFERENCES &'SCHOOLS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 30.00 345738 3/31/2011 102228 WOOLDRIDGE, MARY 84.66 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT. 258778 032811 5410.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 84.66 345739 3131/2011 123911 WRAP CITY GRAPHICS 26.72 DECALS 00001631 258660 11 -106 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 26.72 345740 313112011 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 3,719.00 70TH ST CONSTR SERVICES 258661 4 -01686 -180 01367.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT 3,719.00 346741 3/31/2011 101726 XCEL ENERGY 41.13 51- 5276505 -8 258712 275009063 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 7,994.06 51- 6644819 -9 258713 275868036 5620.6185 LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH PARK 6,473.50 51- 5605640 -1 258714 275437002 5911.6185 LIGHT& POWER WELL PUMPS 14,508.69 573,226.18 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 573,226.18 Total Payments 573,226.18 R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 68,031.43 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 10,123.29 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 1,001.28 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 19,048.24 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 66,988.94 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 27,258.75 05100 ART CENTER FUND 18,946.12 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 1,238.43 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 34,888.87 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 139.40 05600 EDINBOROUGWCENT LAKES FUND 20,395.01 05800 LIQUOR FUND 142,388.35 05900_ UTILITY FUND 104,717.11 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 37,502.51 05950 RECYCLING FUND 107.73 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 5,807.24 09900 PAYROLL FUND 14,643.48 Report Totals 573,226.16 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 3/25/2011 - 3/31/2011 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and Procedures date 31-311 L 3129/2011 11:23 :19 Page- 1 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 1/26/11 - 2/25/11 Card Holder Aerchani Account Name Trans Date Amount Purchase Discription Merchant Name Merchant City State Code JOHN KEPRIOS JOHN KEPRIOS JOHN KEPRIOS JOHN KEPRIOS JOHN KEPRIOS. JOHN KEPRIOS JOHN KEPRIOS JOHN KEPRIOS JOHN KEPRIOS JOHN KEPRIOS JOHN KEPRIOS JOHN KEPRIOS JOHN KEPRIOS JOHN KEPRIOS JEFF LONG JEFF LONG JEFF LONG JEFF LONG JEFF LONG DEB MANGEN DEB MANGEN JOHN WALLIN JOHN WALLIN JOHN WALLIN JOHN WALLIN JOHN WALLIN JOHN WALLIN JOHN WALLIN JOHN .WALLIN JOHN WALLIN JOHN WALLIN 2011/01/25 $35.61 BUSINESS SERVICES -OTHER PB METER REN *TAL - 800 - 228 -1071 CT 2011/01/25 $100.00; POSTAGE PITNEYBOWES - POSTAGE `800 -468 -8454 CT 2011/01/25 $120.00 GOVERNMENT SERVICES -OTHE SECRETARY OF STATE : 651_- 2011368 MN 2011/02/01 $150.00 ADAPTIVE REC PROGRAM PINSTRIPES EDINA MN 2011/02/01 $56.50 ADAPTIVE REC PROGRAM CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK EDINA MN 2011/02/07 $120.00 WOMEN IN LEISURE REGISTRTI\ PAYPAL *WOMENINLEIS.. 402- 935 -7733. CA 2011/02/07 $80.00 WOMEN IN LEISURE REGISTRTN PAYPAL *WOMENINLEIS -402- 935 -7733 CA 2011/02/15 $100:00 POSTAGE PITNEYBOWES- POSTAGE 800 -468 -8454 CT 2011/02/15 $261.72 HEATING CABLES MOR ELECTRIC HEATING A.616- 7841121 MI, 2011/02/18 $145.50 GETTING ALONG DVD KANTOLA PRODUCTIONS L1415- 3819363 CA 2011/02/19 $94.06. GOLF SUPPLIES GOLFSMITH GOLF CTR #68 RICHFIELD MN 2011/02/22 $87.99 HOCKEY PROGRAM DAVANNI'S. #15 EDINA MN 2011/02/22 $468.68 LOGO PENS PENSRUS 71 &3175013 NY 2011/02/23 $43.60.- - EQUIPMENT RENTAL PB METER REN *TAL 800- 228 -1071 CT 2011/01/18 ($73.19) REFUNDED. NATIONAL EXPRESS BIRMINGHAM 2011/02/11 $2,_397.48 'FINANCIAL CRIME.TSK EQUIP BEST BUY 00000059 EDINA MN 2011/02/16 $33.24 INK CARTRIDGE BEST BUY 00000059 EDINA MN 201.1/02/18 $39.34 PUBLIC SAFETY BOOK JONES &BARTLETT LEARN 1 N978-443-5000 MA 2011102/22 $19.29 OUTLET STRIPS MICRO CENTER #045 RETAI 'ST LOUIS PARK MN 2011/02/04 $57.19 COUNCIL MEETING PIZZA LUCE VI INC MINNEAPOLIS MN 2011/02/17 $48:00 CONFERENCE SENSIBLE LAND USE COAL 952- 545 -0505 MN 2011%01/29 $117.78 VOICE OVER MICROPHONE AMAZON.COM AMZN.COM /BILI WA 2011/01/31 $278.92 RETIREMENT WATCH MACY *S EAST #231 EDINA MN 2011/02/01 $144.66 FINANCIAL CRIME TRAVEL MARRIOTT 337P3 O'HARE S' ROSEMONT IL 2011/02/01 $222`95 COUNCIL WORKSHOP D BRIAN'S DELI -#6 MINNEAPOLIS MN 2011/02/02 $38.00 CONFERENCE SENSIBLE LAND USE COAL ,952- 545 -0505 MN 2011/02/02, $21598.00 LIGHT KIT.AND AV SUPPLIES B & H PHOTO- VIDEO.COM 800- 9479950 NY 2011/02/04 $22.76- WALL MOUNT BRACKET MONOPRICE INC -909- 989 =6887 CA 2011/02/04 $338.13,WALL MOUNT BRACKETS MONOPRICE INC 909- 989 -6887 CA 2011/02/08: .; $65.78 CARRIAGE BELT LPS COMPUTER SERVICES ESCONDIDO CA 2011/02/10 $28.00 COMPUTER FAN RADIAN HEATSINKSCOM 408 -988 -6200 CA 5621.6235 5621.6235 1120:6105 1629.6406 1629.6406 1600.6104 1600.6104 5621.6235 5630.6406 5621.6513 5210.6530 1622.6406 5621.6406 5621.6235 1400.6103 1400.6406 1400.6406 1400.6405 1400.6160 1100.6106 1100.6104 2210.6710 1513.6103 1400.6103 1100.6406 1140.6104 2210.6406 5821:6406- 5841.6406 1495.6406 1400.6160 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 1/26/11 - 2/25/11 Card Holder Aerchanl Account Name Trans Date Amount Purchase Discription Merchant Name Merchant City State Code JOHN WALLIN 2011/02/11 $26.72 CARRIAGE HEIGHT TOOL HP SERVICES 800- 325 -5372 CA 1495.N06 JOHN WALLIN 2011/02/15 $202.76 COUNCIL WORKSHOP EDEN AVENUE GRILL EDINA MN 1100.6106 $8,469.47 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing poll les nd procedures date 31(-211( r1A, owe v,,� v �y )0 REPORURECOM MEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VI. A. DEBRA MANGEN ❑ Action From: CITY CLERK Discussion Information Date: APRIL 5, 2011 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received since the last Council meeting. • Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno 3ent: Friday, April 01, 2011 1:33 PM R EC E VE D i o: Scott Neal Cc: Susan Howl 0 APR ^ �0�� Subject: FVV: Citizen input APR Hello there, This message has been forwarded to Scott Neal, Mayor Hovland and members of the City Council. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 lbiunnooci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- original Message---- - From: Sue Keator [ mailto :chickadeedee55 @gmail.com] Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 1:20 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Citizen input Dear Mr. Neal and members of the Council: I understand that there is a move afoot to move the comment portion of City Council meetings to the early part of the meeting and to consider them "off the record ". While I would be in favor of citizens being allowed to speak early on I feel it is extremely important that the comments are considered a regular part of the meeting. They should be taped and in the minutes available for all to see or read. Also, it seems that by moving that portion to before the meeting the Council members would not need to be present to hear any comments. The Council needs to know what the citizens think... after all we are'the employers of the Council, the Mayor and all city employees. Please continue to keep our input as a matter of record. --Thanks so much for all you do. Yours truly, Sue Keator 5041 Yvonne Terrace Sent from my iPad I Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 11:28 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: City Council... VOTE NO APR 0 1 2011 _ Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 927 -8861 Fax 952 - 826 -0389' — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — �1. IbiunnoCc-ci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: NDomek @aol.com [mailto:NDomek @aol.com] Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 11:24 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: City Council... VOTE NO City Council VOTE NO to City Manager Neal's proposal to take Community Comment out of the two monthly City Council Meetings! Please email City Council today! Norbert S Domek Edina 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno ,ent: Friday, April 01, 2011 1:35 PM „c: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Community comments RECE E.D. APR 0 1 2011 Lynette Biunno, Receptionist _____..��,a.s. 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 -826 -0389 r,,` IbiunnoCa)ci edina.mn.us www.CitvofEdina.com -� For Luring, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Mary McDonald [mailto:marymarymcmc @yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011.1:18 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Community comments To whom it may concern: There are 3 adults in our household. we all strongly disagree with the city Manager's proposal to have the Community comments be off - the - record. Residents of Edina already too often feel isolated from the decisions our elected officials make. Please do not approve this change in your meeting procedures. Thank you, Mary McDonald Monica McDonald David McDonald 1 Katie Bisek From: Susan Howl Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 10:23 AM RECEOVED To: Katie Bisek Subject: FW: Keep Community Comment APR 0 1 2011 ------ ---- I From: John Prin [mailto:john@johnprin.com] Sent: Friday, April 01, 20118:26 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Keep Community Comment City Council Members and Mayor Hovland, Please do NOT cancel Community Comment. Please vote NO to s Mr.,Neal' . . proppsal.-It is vital that any resident of Edina has this forum to express their issues. Many thanks, John John Howard Prin, LADC Author, Counselor, Educator 6332 Wilryan Ave Edina, MN 55439 952-941-1870 www.johnprin.com CONNECT# GROW* SOAR 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 10:47 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FVV: Citizen Input at Council Meetings p� ��pp (� n j� RECEO V E� APR 0 1 2011 . - Lynette Biunno, Receptionts - __________..___ f(e1 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 i IbiunnoCcDci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ..� ...For Living, Learning, Raising Ftunilies &Doing Business From: bill cosgrove [ma i Ito: bill.cosgrove @ndsu.edu] Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 10:38 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Citizen Input at Council Meetings Dear City Council, Please accept this request to not change the public commentary made at your meetings to off the record which would relegate comments from Edina citizens to not being in the public record, not videotaped, and not in the official minutes. Citizen input at your meetings should be a matter of public record and should be in the Council minutes in the absence of compelling and convincing reasons to the contrary. Thank you. Best regards, Bill & Peggy Cosgrove Bill Cosgrove Professor Emeritus of English North Dakota State University 6104 Tracy Ave. So. Edina, MN 55436 952- 929 -1393 bill cosp,,rove(a�ndsu.edu Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 10:47 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Community Comment Record FR R „E 2011 -- Lynette Biunno, Receptionist fa; 1 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 ��. Ibiunno4ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families L Doing Business From: burton shacter [mailto:bbshacter @comcast.net] Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 10:18 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Community Comment Record Your constituents in Edina I am certain based on discussions object vehemently to the City Manager Neal's proposal to leave all Citizens comments at the next two Council Meetings "off the Public record ". Please vote no to this proposal. Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno ient: Friday, April 01, 2011 10:40 AM Howl 11 ,c: Susan FW: no! uU�d C L� VE Subject: vote APR 0 1 2011 Lynette Biunno, Receptionist f ` ' 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 : Ibiunno(&ci edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Mary Kosters [ mailto :mkosters @unimaticinc.com] Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 10:0.9 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: vote no! Mary (Donnelly) Kosters -long time resident VOTE NOTE!!II! M! 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 9:12 AM Cc: Susan Howl FW: A No vote EC E O V E Subject: W APR 0 1 1011 K : Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 -826 -0389 h'�Jt Ibiunno(c-di .edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com -j g >ing Families & Doing Busines. ...For Living, nin g, Rai „ From: Carmen EIDE [mailto:carmeneide @yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, April 01, 20119:02 AM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: barbarahoganson @comcast.net Subject: A No vote I vote NO to City Manger Neal's proposal that the Public Comment be performed "off the record ", at 6:30 PM of the City Council meeting, not part of public record, not videotaped, and not in the minutes. I find it very ironic that you are requesting this when it's the very people that pay taxes in this city and your salary to keep them from having their voices heard on the record. Sent from my Whone i Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 9:11 AM Howl _ Cc: Susan Subject: FW: Public Comment at Council Meetings EnRIEWED 011 Ili -A Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 1 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(Mci.edina.mmus I www.CitvofEdina.com ` Raising Families & Doing Business ...For Living Learning, r From: frabonimn @earthlink.net [mailto:frabonimn @ earthlink.net] Sent: Friday, April 01, 20119:00 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Public Comment at Council Meetings To Mayor and City Council Members, I seriously question why you would keep a public comment time in Council Meetings, but not record what the public has said about any issue discussed. This seems like you want to erase any evidence of what the public has said on an issue you have voted on. If you are going to have the public speak - and I think you should - then record it ! Sincerely, Ron Fraboni 5505 Grove Street frabonimn@earthlink.net EarthLink Revolves Around You. 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno 9:08 AM E ��ii��e (C �� d lG V D Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 vv Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: vote NO APR 0 1 2011 _ _ .... Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -038.9 lbiunno @ci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business -- Original Message---- - From: Jeanne.StPierre [ mailto :Jeanne.StPierre @target.com] Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 8:51 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: FW: vote NO This is a clarification of my e-mail below. Keep the residents comments part of the public record and part of the minutes and video taped. Thank you. From: Jeanne.StPierre Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 8:47 AM To: edinamail @ci.edina.mn.us Subject: vote NO Dear City Council, please vote no to Mr. Neal's proposal to take the Community Comments out of the two monthly City Council meetings. The city council meetings should be open. Everyone in Edina needs to have a voice and to have the opportunity to address our council members in person . Not everyone can or wants to submit ideas /comments.on..li.ne..Keep..our city government open. Thank you. Jeanne and John St. Pierre 6005 Arbour Lane Edina 1 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Community Comment at Council Meetings (( , ___..._ ........ __ From: Gordon Johnson [mailto:gj ohnson3 @comcast.net] Sent: Friday, April 01, 20118:50 AM --------------- To: Lynette Biunno Cc: 'Barbara Hoganson' Subject: Community Comment at Council Meetings Good Morning, Jim Hovland, Ann Swenson, Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle and Josh Sprague: I have been advised that City Manager Scott Neal is proposing and recommending that the Community Comment portion of the City Council meetings be eliminated. I do not know his reasoning behind this recommendation. Regardless of his reason(s), I believe that it would be a monumental mistake to remove this item from the Council agendas because: 1. It reduces the transparency that I believe the citizens of all cities, not only Edina, want and expect from their elected leaders. Citizen respect for government is at an unacceptable low in the country today. Citizens need to become more informed and involved in their government. Taking away their opportunity to come to city hall and offer comments (or even just to watch) just doesn't make sense to me. 2. During those many years in which I was either a member or,the chair of the Planning Commission, it was my goal to give everyone present an opportunity to speak, make comments, raise questions, etc. so long as new information was being provided to the Commission. Ann Swenson should be able to attest to that philosophy since she was on the Planning Commission with me for a number of years. I always stated that "...if one couldn't speak publically at the city government level, then there was no level of government at which they could effectively participate.... 3. 1 would not only urge you to retain the Community Comment portion of the agenda, but I would encourage you to put it first on the agenda. More citizens are likely to participate if they can come and go fairly quickly. My experience has been that they aren't willing to wait an hour or two for the opportunity to speak. At the same time, I believe you need to have recognizable time limits on each speaker and on the entire Community Comment process so that you can conduct the city's business within a reasonable period of time. None of us enjoyed rolling out of city hall at midnight or later on a regular basis. If anyone has questions or comments, I can be reached by e-mail at either gjjohnson3(aDcomcast.net or giohnson(a)-tn- law.com. My home and office telephone numbers are, respectively, (952) 925 -1016 and (952) 835 -7000. Thank you for reviewing my comments. Gordon Johnson Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 9:03 AM �� �� /�(C V IG Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: vote NO AM — 1� O 1 2011 AM a a Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 lbiunno(@ci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business -- Original Message---- - From: Jeanne.StPierre [ mailto :Jeanne.StPierre @target.com] Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 8:47 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: vote NO Dear City Council, please vote no to Mr. Neal's proposal to take the Community Comments out of the two monthly City Council meetings. The city council meetings should be open. Everyone in Edina needs to have a voice and to have the opportunity to address our council members in person . Not everyone can or wants to submit ideas /comments on line. Keep our city government open. Thank you. Jeanne and John St. Pierre 6005 Arbour Lane Edina 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno )ent: Friday, April 01, 2011 9i38 AM Jc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: ECE V16® APR 0 1 2011 Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 1 Fax 952-826-0389 lbiunno(c'D-ci.edina.rnnrus WWW CityofEdina-corn For Living. Lem earning, Raising Families & Doing Bu, ines, ... From: Erin Schmidtke [mailto:ruehleem@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, April 01, 20119:37 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Please VOTE NO to City Manager Neal's proposal to take Community Comment out of the two monthly City Council Meetings! Thanks! Erin Schmidtke 1 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Thank You To Larry Diekman ECEWW MAR 31 2011 From: Ahrens, Stephanie [ mailto :Stephanie.Ahrens @lfhi.com] Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 10:16 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Thank You To Larry Diekman Good Morning! Could you please pass on a word of thank you to the "boss" at The City of Edina regarding your employee, Larry Diekman? Two weeks ago I dropped my packet of credit cards /drivers license /cell phone etc. while coming out of the parking ramp on Halifax and 49 1/2 St. I drove home like crazy thinking perhaps I had left it at home on my way to work, tore the house apart with no success. I went through my drawers at work and needless to say was imagining the worse possible scenario regarding identify theft, credit card fraud, etc. Then Larry stopped by my office (Lund Food Holdings) and asked one of my co-workers if I worked for LFHI and that he had something that belonged to me (my Lunds ID was in the packet as well). I was out of the office at the time and when I returned, my co-worker handed me Larry's business card and said he had something that I had lost. I called Larry right away hoping it was my packet of cards, etc. It was! I told Larry I would meet him wherever he was to pick it up. He said not to worry he was close and would meet me at the back door of my building in a couple minutes. Apparently this packet had fallen out of my purse on my way in from the ramp. I am so thankful that Larry in doing his rounds found my information and made an all out effort to find me and get me back my belongings. I wish to express my sincere thanks to Larry. I had imagined the worse scenario and it turned out to be a great scenario. Regards, Stephanie Ahrens Lund Food Holdings 952 - 915 -3753 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Attention City Council From: Harris, Kevin [mailto:kharris @craig- hallum.com] Sent: Thursday, March 31, 20117:57 AM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: 'marthakay22 @gmail.com' Subject: Attention City Council RRECE V lam® MAR 31 My name is Kevin Harris, my wife and three children live at 4702 Lakeview Drive in Edina. I am writing pursuant to the _Lake Harvey and Lakeview Drive neighborhood controversy which I know you are all familiar with. A spectacular outcome from the Harris family perspective would be to go back to plan A as outlined in the letter from the Golf Terrace neighborhood association. (Leave Lakeview Drive the current width and have unrestricted parking) Not wishing to pursue the spectacular to the neglect of the achievable, because facts surrounding engineering and environmental issues seem to make Plan A no longer an option, as the city has determined they are going to address the water quality in Lake Harvey. I will chose to pursue the achievable which would be to have unlimited parking on the non -lake side of Lakeview with the street remaining two way. I would also respectfully ask the council to not disrupt our natural view of the lake by having no- parking signs limited to each corner of Lakeview Drive in the narrowed section. (99.9% of parking will be family and guest of residents so compliance should not be a problem) This seems to be a common sense solution which will meet the needs not only of the Harris Family, but rest of the residents of Lakeview Drive as well as the Golf Terrace Neighborhood association and the great city of Edina. I appreciate how willing and accessible the Mayor and Council Members have been to listening to my concerns. I am very hopeful for a solution that will protect our home's value as well as the living quality we have been accustomed to on Lakeview Drive. Kevin Harris Kevin Harris President Craig - Hallum Capital Group 222 South Ninth Street Suite 350 Minneapolis Minnesota 55402 Phone 612- 334 -6320 Cell 612- 961 -1067 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 8:18 AM To: Scott Neal (� Cc: Susan Howl �t�����IG® Subject: FW: public hearings IIGG�v MAR 16 2011 Hello there, This message is being forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Scott Neal. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist /ELI 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(cpci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com 1. J. ...For Living, Leanting, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Susan [mailto:spetersen4 @comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2011 5:11 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: public hearings Do not eliminate the city council public hearings for residents it is unfair to do that, then we dont know what is going on in our city of edina. We as residents have the right to know what is going on and have a voice in it. Risk to residents right now without the earliest transparency of City Staff and Neighborhoods at the onset of development discussions, notice periods being unfair, and the zoning code not being updated so residents can rely on it as objective guide for development, we would recommend that these issues get resolved first before am" of these Planning Commission recommendations are granted. susan Petersen 1 Samantha Frank R EC E Q v E 6137 Sherman Circle V f Edina, Minnesota, 55436 MAR 3 0 Zp» I March 28, 2011 The Honorable James Hovland 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland: lama 9th grade student of Valley View Middle School in Edina. My family and I like to bike frequently in the summer and take walks or go for a run from time to time. We like having a park trail near our house, Bredesen Park to go on walks or bike rides together. However, we sometimes like to go on other routes or go on longer walks or rides. We have gone to our school and back, to the community center and back, and other, longer routes. This is also fun — it can be interesting going to new destinations. We have often wished, though, that there was a longer trail than Bredesen Park nearby. This is one reason why I am in favor of the building of a Nine Mile Creek Trail. This is an issue that has been widely controversial throughout Edina. However, I believe that the positive impacts of the trail far outweigh any negative impacts it could produce. In a City Council meeting on December 7, 2010, citizens of Edina shared their opinions on the idea for this trail and some background and additional information was given on the nature of this trail. In a survey shown in this meeting, it was shown that 86 percent of the people surveyed (households) had more walking and biking trails in their community as their primary concern. That equates to just short of 18 thousand households as Dr. John Keprios, the Park and Recreation Director estimated at that meeting. In a related survey, it was shown that 84 percent of people surveyed want walking and biking trails for exercise and fitness purposes and to enjoy nature and the outdoors. In addition, this creek -based trail would be safer than a road -based option. As Dr. Keprios noted, there would be fewer driveway and road crossings. A creek -based trail would likely be used more than a road based option. Reasonably, a creek -based trail would be more aesthetically pleasant as it is more geared towards enjoying nature. It would be a great way to bring the community together in something that everybody in Edina can enjoy. From what I heard in the testimonies of citizens of Edina, this certainly seems to match the voice of the people. To quote Ted McKlveen,a senior at Edina High School and the captain of the cross country team (with about 120 members), the Nordic team (also 120), and the track and field team (with close to 100 members), Each day in the fall and the spring, there are close to 200 athletes running on our streets for daily practice and our practices consist on the streets because we do not really have a trail to run on." He continues, "Last year, I was hit by a car as I was crossing a crosswalk on Gleason and this incident was really a wake -up call for me to realize how unsafe the practices that the students are involved in every day are. A nine mile creek regional trail along the creek would minimize the traffic interactions along with intersections that the students would have to deal with on a daily basis during practice." He also notes that currently they hire a bus on weekends for practices to take the cross country team out to trails near other high schools, like trails next to Minnetonka High School, for example. This, he says is "an additional transportation cost and time investment that our team has to deal with because we do not have these trails located within our community." He explains that Edina is the only city in the Lake Athletic Conference not to have off -road regional trails easily accessible from their high school. For the reason of athlete's safety and to have an off -road trail on which athletes can practice in Edina, as well as a way for people just to get out and enjoy nature with their friends and family, I believe there is not much doubt regarding the necessity of this trail. For these reasons, I would strongly urge the creation of this trail. Thank you for reading my letter. I truly appreciate you taking your time to consider what I had to say. And with that, I conclude. Sincerely, Samantha Frank FEC o�E®March 24, 2011 $ 2011 Members of the Edina City Council Mayor Jim Hovland Councilmember Joni Bennett Councilmember Mary Brendle Councilmember Josh Sprague Councilmember Ann Swanson Dear Mayor and Members of the Edina City Council: Re: The Golf Terrace Roadway Improvements Project BA -355 We are writing to respectfully request that the Council reconsider a series of decisions that are contrary to the general opinion of the residents affected by the Golf Terrace project. These decisions were voted on at the March 15 Council meeting, at the conclusion of a remarkably convoluted process, without, we believe, adequate procedural due process. First, and most egregiously, the Council voted to completely prohibit parking on the section of Lakeview road lying north of Lake Harvey. The plans being considered by the Council at that meeting did not contemplate a total ban on parking. One plan proposed prohibiting parking on the lake side. One Councilmember mentioned the notion of a complete ban, but there was little, if any, discussion of it by the Council. Certainly there was no notice, much less opportunity to comment, provided the residents prior to this vote. The neighborhood strongly opposes any parking restrictions on that street, and a total prohibition is absolutely unacceptable. We believe the opinion of the residents on this item was unknown to the Council due to the limited (and in the case of the full ban, entirely absent) opportunity to comment. When Option B (narrowed Lakeview Dr, with filtration swales) was introduced at the neighborhood informational meeting on February 22 by Public Works, there was no discussion about the elimination of parking. Had there been, our neighborhood would have strongly urged the City to either modify the plan further or go back to the original design (Option A) without filtration swales in our written response to the March Council meeting. The elimination of parking on Lakeview Dr. would cause a significant burden on residents of Lakeview Dr. and Golf Terrace who use this road for both guest and overflow parking. The prospect of numerous unsightly "No Parking" signs along that road is disagreeable both to the residents with homes there and to others in the neighborhood who enjoy walking there. The restriction or prohibition of parking on this road would have a significant negative impact on the value of our homes in this neighborhood. Given the necessity of reopening the matter to remove the parking ban, we urge the Council to go one step further and revert to Option A as it pertains to this section of road, retaining the present 26' width and unrestricted parking. Our neighborhood understands that Option B was offered in response to concerns over Lake Harvey water quality. However, as we learned for the fast time at the March 15'h Council meeting, the swales discussed at the February 22 open house will provide only the most nominal improvement as a percentage of water entering Lake Harvey. Our consensus opinion is that this marginal gain does not begin to justify the dramatic disruption of the parking restriction (or elimination) or the disruption to and diversion of traffic flow that the Option B approach would cause. We were not given the opportunity to express this opinion after having learned these facts. We ask the Council to consider it now. Golf Terrace/Lake Harvey, continued Page 2 of 2 It is our understanding that Public Works was recommending Option A and we support this recommendation as it pertains to retaining the current width and unrestricted parking on this portion of Lakeview. Our neighborhood will continue our work with the Watershed District and will focus on other strategies that will provide a more effective overall benefit to water entering the lake. We therefore urge that when the City Council corrects the plan to remove the ban on parking, it consider the opinion of the residents (and indeed the requirements of procedural due process) as well as the recommendation of Public Works, and go back to the originally designed plan with no filtration swales and a wider road that allows parking. Thank you for your attention to this very important matter.- Neighbors in the Golf Terrace/Lake Harvey Neighborhood Association (see attached page for signatures) Cc: Scott Neal, City Manager Wayne Houle, City Engineer and Director of Public Works Letter to Edina City Council March 23, 2011 Signature Page Name Address �cJr ✓� `1 c.f f �errf G c �I Zd 7�� rPhone L - Cam, -U q7C Ca 1-F TCE rcL �l �Z. Ur4--� vd& (I 6V� 3'-FJ- A I - 'bc-o C �, TeX r oc�-, q52 . G zo ir�-t o7 (tee C ail `— �`�e ✓\ `T n' ``� �`l { ��►��t - N cT 02� ^i %' Xlz fV4v� h cA0 Z LL&-,V \ L A/ �JZ L11 b Y90 �/ivt� Letter to Edina City Council March 23, 2011 Signature Page Susan Howl Contacts: Mayor Joann Anderson; Mayor Thomas Crosby; Mayor James Doak; Mayor Cheryl Fischer; Mayor Tom Furlong; Mayor Tim Hultmann; Mayor Debbie Gottel; Mayor Mark Hanus; Mayor Mary Hershberger Thun; Mayor James Hovland; Mayor Jeff Jacobs; Chairman Charles Johnson; Mayor Marvin Johnson; Mayor Deb Kind; Mayor William LaBelle; Mayor Christine Lizee; Mayor Linda Loomis; Mayor Gene Maxwell; Councilor Lili McMillan; Mayor Sarah Reinhardt dUa Nirehl; Mayor R. T. Rybak; Mayor Terry Schneider; Mayor Paul Skrede; Mayor Kelli Sla �Gfiairman Si Tesch; Mayor Rick Weible; Mayor Ken Willcox ����'` me 18 From: Telly Mamayek [ mailto :TMamayek @minnehahacreek.org] Sent: Friday, March 25, 2011 11:38 AM To: info @ci.minnetonka - beach.mn.us; Tom.Crosby @ci.medina.mn.us; jdoak.woodiand @hotmail.com; cFiischer @ci.minnetrista.mn.us; tfurlong @ci.chanhassen.mn.us; jmoeller @ci.long- lake.mn.us; citycouncil @cityofrichfield.org; mahanus @frontiernet.net; info @ci.victoria.mn.us; Lynette Biunno; jacobsjeffrey @comcast.net; laketowntownship @broadband - mn.com; marvdjohnson @gmail.com; dkind100 @gmail.com; bill @labellebarin.com; ciizee @ci.shorewood.mn.us; linda.loomis @ci.golden - valley.mn.us; emax33721 @aol.com; Imcmillan @ci.orono.mn.us; sgreinhardt @hotmaii.com; nruehl @mchsi.com; jeremy .hanson @ci.minneapolis.mn.us; tschneider @eminnetonka.com; PaulSkrede @mchsi.com; KSlavik @ci.plymouth.mn.us; cityhall @mapleplain.com; watertowntownship @frontiernet.net; stboni @visi.com; KenWillcox@wayzata.org. Subject: Grays Bay Dam II Mayors and Town Chairpersons, As the level of Lake Minnetonka continues to rise, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) is taking steps to manage the situation. On Thursday, the lake level was measured at 930.02 feet, which is above the height of the weir /emergency spillway which was built to an elevation of 930 feet. Due to an ice ridge that has developed in front of the weir, the water is not yet going over it. As described in a previous email, the Grays Bay Dam is operated with three adjustable gates that open from the bottom. With the gates closed, water has begun to flow over the top of the gates. To regulate and measure the water being discharged from Lake Minnetonka and to mitigate the rising water level on the lake, the MCWD has opened two of the gates at the Grays Bay Dam with some water spilling over the third one. It's estimated the discharge of water into Minnehaha Creek is at 35 cubic feet per second (cfs). We will begin to update the Minnetonka Lake level and creek discharge on the home page of our web site www.minnehahacreek.org. The MCWD will continue to increase the discharge while managing creek capacity. Email updates will be sent each time the Grays Bay Dam discharge is changed. Also, updates from you on creek and lake conditions are very important as we manage the high water. Please send that information to Project Manager Renae Clark at 952 - 641 -4510 or rclark minnehahacreek.or�. The MCWD is committed to balancing the need to manage the rising lake level with the need to control the amount of water flowing into the creek, where ice is still present in several areas. It's hoped by working together, we can mitigate any issues this spring flooding season brings. Telly Mamayek I I Communications Manager I I www.minnehahacreek.org 18202 Minnetonka Blvd, Deephaven, MN 55391 11 952.641.4508 Susan Howl Subject: FW: Red balloons n,p - - - -- Original Message - - - -- FFRI� v From: Mary March (mailto:mary @newcitycov.org] ZO11 Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 11:44 PM To: Lynette Biunno __ Subject: Red balloons Dear Ann, the other council members and the city of Edina: Thank you for your tireless efforts getting the word out n putting up balloons. What a thing of beauty. I can't describe how powerful it was to see the balloons and feel the support from you all. So many people who I will never meet or know have come together by giving their time, money and energy to celebrate Chase's life. I am so proud of the Edina community. Ann, I was so thankful you stopped on Wooddale Ave on Wednesday to tell me who you are and that you were putting up balloons too. It gave me and my kids strength to press on handing out balloons and flyers. To be honest, on Thursday night as I drove around I. wondered if the route would be blanketed with balloons. Would we have enough balloons? Because of people like you, there were! Thank you for all your hard work! As I drove to the funeral, the balloons helped me smile and feel the love of the community. I know it did the same for the Petersons. There is a balloon tribute and photography on the Remembering Chase Facebook page (just type in remembering chase in the search bar on facebook) of the balloons in case you want to look at it and remember this beautiful Friday 3/18/11 when the Edina and Minneapolis communities told the Petersons and all around us that our community cares and has a huge heart. Please pass this to anyone who you know helped with balloon efforts. We, the friends and family of the Petersons, are beyond grateful for your efforts. Mary C. March (friend of the Petersons) I s 4'4,L ESTATE BROKERAGE March 20, 2011 Mayor Hovland Councilperson Joni Bennett Councilperson Mary Brindle Councilperson Josh Sprague Councilperson Ann Swenson 4801 West 50' Street Edina, Minnesota 55439 Follow up to request for a pet variance Ladies and Gentlemen: G'3"""oE'MEf .. MAR 1 8 2011 I I thank you for the opportunity to present my request 5 dogs for medical reason and for the prestige and diversity for Edina of having Champion dogs and their trainer. I would like to clarify a number of items in the testimony. The first issue I have is that the merits of the requests were not addressed. It seems that this was a rehash of 2009 which it was not. No where in the questioning or in the discussion were the merits of the request touched on. The questions on where I trained and discussions of dog breeding- were brought up but had little relevance to the conversation. I am looking to get a Papillion replacement out of most likely Texas or Maryland that has the credentials to be national AKC champions. I was looking to get one in the next six months to a year and probably one in 3 to 4 years if I am still able to train. All my existing animals are neutered or spayed and can not be used for breeding. The discussion of where they would be placed in these small units seemed a bit unusual unless you are assuming the dogs are Great Danes. When I train, all three of the existing dogs can be housed in a 2 foot by 2 foot kennel for a couple hours at a time. Four square feet in a 2000 SF unit seems to be a small consideration to me. When they are left for a few hours they have kennels that fit under end tables and really can't be seen. We had 5 pets for 10 years and it was not an issue until the dog enforcement people saw one of the Wayne L. Carlson, President waynecarlson@popp.net 7400 Metro Blvd #213 Edina, Minnesota 55439 Phone 952 -844 -0500 Fax 952- 844 -9078 cats. Our house is clean and neat. I would think that as 67 years olds we could be trusted with managing the pets in our home. We do own the home and if it is damaged it is a significant loss to us not the city. The testimony of Ms. Handler was absolutely off the map. The Handlers have not seen the dogs in the last two years unless they saw me walking them out the front window. I have seen the Handlers probably 3 times in the last two years and not with any dogs. They are pretty much recluses. The dogs have not jumped up on Mrs. Handler and in fact I have trained the dogs off leash to go up to someone and sit directly in front of them to be petted. Ms. Handler claims in her testimony that they are not afraid of dogs yet she claims they peer around the door to see that dogs are in the garage. When you don't tell the truth, lies many times get to be in conflict. I actually carry the dogs to the kennels when they are in town (100 days a year). In other locations I can direct them from buildings or dog parks to go directly to their kennels and they do so. These dogs have soft mouths from training and taking treats 10 to 20 times a day. They are in good health, well fed and well treated and there is absolutely no reason for them to bite. I constantly have treats with me which makes me the center of attention. At least The Handlers now have stopped testifying that the dogs are running loose and crapping all over the garage. When Dr. Weaver gave me my re -exam for my insurance physical it came out that he and Mr. Handler both worked at North Memorial hospital where Dr. Weaver was a mentor. His impression was that Dr. Handler went off on tangents and had to be brought back to reality. I have already told you of the association president apologizing to me for believing them. According to recent surveys, 27% of Americans think that there are still unfound weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Another 25% think that Obana was born in Kenya and another 23% think that Joan of Are was Noah'.s wife, That leaves. a large enough tent so that 6 '/Z pound and 10 pound dogs could be considered a nuisance to the neighborhood. You heard testimony, and by the way, it was from people totally outside the concerned area, that giving a variance would be a dangerous precedent something like keeping nuclear weapons in the basement. All the people next to me, save one, and across the street know the dogs and myself, yet their opinions are discounted for the prejudices of the distant. You have a pet policy and the opportunity for variances. I have rules in my apartment business and I have standards for deviation. It seems perfectly reasonable that you would have criteria for variances such as substantiated medical reasons. Otherwise, if you take people's money for variance applications with no opportunity for exceptions, it would seem like a lapse of integrity. Edina was a vigorous pips erous city that encouraged development and business opportunities. The taxAvas`large so the homeowner costs were relatively low. Today with the lobbying of Mr. Bohan and his followers, every project has to be scaled down to meet the fears of the retired who live here a few months and have a vision for the city as a I Susan Howl Subject: FW: parking at 50th & france //j�� S MAR From: Bradford Dillman [ mailto:ireneselznick @yahoo.com] Sent: Friday, March 18, 20118:32 PM To: Lynette Biunno - Subject: parking at 50th & france I've just read the article in the Edina Sun which says that all employees will be required to pay for parking permits. What is wrong with you people? Councilmember Ann Swenson voted in favor of this, but was quoted as saying, "If you only have 270 permit spots and you have 1,500 employess ... you still really haven't solved your parking issue." She's right. When the new construction was done a few years ago, why wasn't additional parking a factor? It goes without saying, you add more business, you upgrade existing business... more people come. So your solution is to basically "flip the bird" to the people who work there? Yes, we all need customers, but without employees, the customers vanish. You call yourselves a council? Of what Has anyone talked about repainting the parking lines within the ramp? And a solid line needs to be painted up the middle of the ramp's roadway so that people know which side to drive on. AND tickets should be given to cars that park sloppily, taking up more than one space! I only hope you all work at 50th & France. RRECEOVE MAR 18 2011 4t1 I d 0 ? /A,�t i%w-tmls DEFINING EXCELLENCE e ol J V J Ila s 1 W" ® A-13, .. { 6;r� aan�ad. ' March 22, 2011 Marty Scheerer Edina Fire Chief Edina Fire Department 6250 Tracy Ave Edina, MN 55436 RECEoVED Mna e s eon Dear Marty Scheerer Edina Fire Chief I am writing to extend my sincere gratitude to the city of Edina's fire department for their prompt and heroic, response to the 911 call on March 17, 2011 where I needed medical attention after falling on York Ave S & Hazelton Rd. It is clear the firefighters leading the rescue did so with considerable risk to their own personal safety. They did an outstanding job in assisting me and my injury's providing me the best medical care and service. Were it not for their training and leadership, I might have encountered further health issues. Additionally, I would like to express my gratitude in the way Fire Chief Marty Scheerer help me out in buying me a new denim jacket and polo shirt in which I am very grateful because I couldn't have bought it with my Social Security income. I many times become ungrateful to other for their assistance. Please accept my apologies for this attitude that I demonstrated to the Edina Fire Department. They have proven to be very helpful and accommodating me, I am extremely lucky to have such professional and well - trained fire personnel to protect me and the community of Edina Minnesota. Thank you to all of staff that assisted me. Sincerely, Michael John Muhar wN , N� w� J Marty Scheerer From: Sent: To: Subject: Good morning Chief Scheerer- Norr, Paul <Paul.Norr @Avnet.com> Friday, March 25, 201111:59 AM Marty Scheerer Please Pass On My Thanks RECE6VED ►ua L 8 eon At 1:45AM this morning, my wife called 911 to ask for assistance as I had passed out. Your medics were at our door quickly. The two medics were extremely through and quickly assessed my condition. I did not get their names but the clipboard said "394" on it. Can you please pass on my thanks to those gentlemen. I got in to my doctor first thing this morning and he is running some tests to see what might be happening. I feel very fortunate to live in Edina and want to compliment these two medics. Can you please pass this on to the guys.. Thanks! Paul Paul E. Norr Director of Finance Rorke Data - An Operating Group of Avnet, Inc 952/943 -7820 (Direct) paul.norr @avnet.com 1 0 L C EDVED 3 0 2011 March 28, 2011 Mayor James Hovland City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland, TONE'S MIAWalk a Mile in Her Shoes The Ir►temooml Men's Mares to Stop Rape. Sexual Assault & Gender N/lolence ,p.-. bV. Thank you so much for your support of Cornerstone's 2010 Walk A Mile In Her Shoes® event last April. Your participation helped launch an inaugural event that exceeded our expectations —we had 437 participants and raised over $50,000 to support Cornerstone's work with families experiencing domestic violence. Cornerstone believes that domestic violence is not a gender issue; it is a societal issue. We have a long history of engaging men in our efforts to prevent domestic violence. In addition to raising awareness of the impact of domestic violence on families, this year's Walk will also serve as the kickoff for a year -long campaign to educate men about the critical role they play in ending domestic violence in our community. We hope to recruit over 500 walkers for this year's event and we hope you will be one of them! We expect the walk to take no more than two hours. We have added some fun new aspects to this year's walk, including the opportunity to get your team's photo taken and a prize drawing for Sun Country airline tickets. If you would like to participate as Cornerstone's guest, please contact Courtney Poja at courtneypna cornerstonemn.org or 952- 646 -6526. We look forward to seeing you on April 16'h at 7.30am at the Mall of America, Macy's Court. Best, Susan Neis Executive Director, Cornerstone 5 Thank You AM Than yo so much for bei g an important part of our Soap 4 Hope service learning project! All of our efforts accounted for over 20,000 bars of soap being sent to Haiti! The soap will help to curb the cholera outbreak there. We look forward to future collaborations! Mike Seaman and class 91y� AND WARMEST WISHES. kG tk-t4 Pi l" i9l'" Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno gent: Wednesday, March 16, 2011 12:43 PM ;c: Susan Howl Subject: FW: FBI -LEEDA Identity Theft Summit Attachments: Minneapolis MN 4 26 11.pdf i=- Lynette Biunno, Receptionist i IE ?i t`' 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(rDci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ..For Living, Learning, Raisin; Families & Doing Business From: Mikaela Ober [mailto :mober @nationalstrategies.com] Sent:' Wednesday, March 16, 2011 12:38 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: FBI -LEEDA Identity Theft Summit Dear Mayor and Council Members, ra RRECEOVED MAR 16 2011 Life Lock Inc. is pleased to invite you to an important FBI -LEEDA event on April 26, 2011. Identity theft is one of the fastest growing crimes in the United States. Minnesota alone reported over 17,400 fraud and identity theft complaints to the FTC in 2010 year. In an effort to further educate law enforcement about this critical issue affecting their communities, the FBI Law Enforcement Executive Development Association (FBI - LEEDA) and Life Lock, Inc. are sponsoring identity theft summits across the country. The next summit in Minnesota is taking place in Minneapolis on April 26, 2011. The event includes a day -long training session providing local and statewide law enforcement officials with the latest information on identity theft trends, new scams and investigative methods. As a leader on this crucial issue, we want to make sure you are aware this event was happening and invite you to attend as a special guest. Attached, please find your invite for further details. Please let us know if you, or a representative from your office, will be able to attend. Please RSVP to me at mober nationalstrategies.com to reserve a space as seating is limited. Thank you, MIKAELA OBER NSI I CONSULTANT 1400 EVE STREET, NW SUITE 900 1 WASHINGTON, DC 20005 T 202. 349. 7002 (DIREcr) I M 202 . 590.0454 MOBER NATIONALSTRATEGIES.COM www.nationalstrategies.com V4%kh-N nsi March 24, 2011 City Council Members Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50'h Street Edina, MN 55439 C� E® t�AR 9 2011 6750 Valley View Road - Edina; MN 55439 Dear City Council Members, A group of students from VVMS are working on a service leaning project and would like to inform you about a growing issue in our community. About 200 years ago we had many native grasses and plants. Not only did they look nice, but they also soaked up most of the rainfall. Most of what you see now is a grass called Kentucky bluegrass. The difference between Kentucky bluegrass and the native grasses are native grasses have extremely long roots compared to the grass we have today allowing them to soak up more water. For example one type of native grass had roots up to 15 feet long. With most of the water soaked up by the native plants, only 10% of the rainfall would flow into the river. This decreased pollution by decreasing the amount of debris and nutrients that flow with the rain water into the creek. Since the, creek makes its own nutrients, they would pollute the water by encouraging algae growth. Not only do we have Kentucky bluegrass instead of native plants, but we also have an increased number of impervious surfaces. These impervious surfaces also contribute to water pollution. Today, about 50% of the rainfall flows into stone drains and into the creek with pollutants. Another type of pollutant is salt. In Mimiesota this is a very big problem because of our cold temperatures and ice buildup. One of the experiment's we preformed was to go outside and see how much salt was on a single square of concrete on the sidewalk. We found about a quarter of a pound of salt. Luckily our school uses an alternative to salt. Imagine how much- salt would-be on the length of a street. Some of the water samples found in the creek were so salty it was not even considered to be flesh water. In conclusion, we would like to discuss possible solutions to the problem of an over usage of impervious materials. Currently we have thought of most probably using porous asphalt. It is a cheaper alternative to impervious surfaces. Our goal is to make 30 % of all new. - roads out of porous asphalt. We understand that this change W60d'riot be immediate and we plan for this to be a long tern change. We would like to present our plan and more details on May 3, 2011 and if it is possible it would be best if we could present around 8:00 PM. If you have any questions contact us at timronhovde @edina.kl2.mn.us i�r��y,5�?�nrnuo (nab From, Valley View Middle School (Impervious surfaces group) bdc� �Ae,*6 l�ai'eK -v, T, Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno ent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 2:44 PM c: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Invintation to Recycling Presentation By South View Middle School Students LRECEV.. - Lynette Biunno, Receptionist q 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 �� + cD Ibiunno(- ci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families Doing Business ----------- From: Thomas Barden [ mailto: thomasbl6562 @apps.edina.kl2.mn.us] Sent: Thursday, March 17, 20112:29 PM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: Jennifer Buckley Subject: Invintation to Recycling Presentation By South View Middle School Students Dear City Council, We have been studying the idea apathy in our 7th grade class. Out teacher assigned us a project asking us to find a problem in our community. Then gather evidence to prove this is going on, and finnaly find a way to solve it. The problem we noticed was not enough people were recycling. After having a survey, we found out that less than half of the people we sent the survey to know enough about recycling to know what can be recycled and what can't be. We wan to show you a presentation in which we believe has a solution to informing kids and adults more about recycling. If you could, please join us at a presentation on March 23rd at 1:10 in the South View Middle School Theatre. Sincerely, Myles M., Thomas B., and Jack M. 4725 South View Ln. Edina,.MN 55424 i r` t AGENDA ITEM March 24, 2011 Members of the Edina City Council Mayor Jim Hovland CITy�, Councilmember Joni Bennett St Councilmember Mary Brendle Councilmember Josh Sprague A1AR 0 ?011 Councilmember Ann Swanson RECL4,V►�rL Dear Mayor and Members of the Edina City Council: Re: The Golf Terrace Roadway Improvements Project BA -355 We are writing to respectfully request that the Council reconsider a series of decisions that are contrary to the general opinion of the residents affected by the Golf Terrace project. These decisions were voted on at the March 15 Council meeting, at the conclusion of a remarkably convoluted process, without, we believe, adequate procedural due process. First, and most egregiously, the Council voted to completely prohibit parking on the section of Lakeview road lying north of Lake Harvey. Tile plans being considered by the Council at that meeting did not contemplate a total ban on parking. One plan proposed prohibiting parking on the lake side. One Councilmember mentioned the notion of a complete ban, but there was little, if any, discussion of it by the Council. Certainly there was no notice, much less opportunity to comment, provided the residents prior to this vote. The neighborhood strongly opposes any parking restrictions on that street, and a total prohibition is absolutely unacceptable. We believe the opinion of the residents on this item was unknown to the Council due to the limited (and in the case of the full ban, entirely absent) opportunity to comment. When Option B (narrowed Lakeview Dr, with filtration swales) was introduced at the neighborhood informational meeting on February 22 by Public Works, there was no discussion about the elimination of parking. Had there been, our neighborhood would have strongly urged the City to either modify the plan further or go back to the original design (Option A) without filtration swales in our written response to the March Council meeting. The elimination of parking on Lakeview Dr. would cause a significant burden on residents of Lakeview Dr. and Golf Terrace who use this road for both guest and overflow parking. The prospect of numerous unsightly 'No Parking" signs along that road is disagreeable both to the residents with homes there and to others in the neighborhood who enjoy walking there. The restriction or prohibition of parking on this road would have a significant negative impact on the value of our homes in this neighborhood. Given the necessity of reopening the matter to remove the parking ban, we urge the Council to go one step further and revert to Option A as it pertains to this section of road, retaining the present 26' width and unrestricted parking. Our neighborhood understands that Option B was offered in response to concerns over Lake Harvey water quality. However, as we learned for the first time at the March 151h Council meeting, the swales discussed at the February 22 open house will provide only the most nominal improvement as a percentage of water entering Lake Harvey. Our consensus opinion is that this marginal gain does not begin to justify the dramatic disruption of the parking restriction (or elimination) or the disruption to and diversion of traffic flow that the Option B approach would cause. We were not given the opportunity to express this opinion after having learned these facts. We ask the Council to consider it now. Golf Terrace/Lake Harvey, continued Page 2 of 2 It is our understanding that Public Works was recommending Option A and we support this recommendation as it pertains to retaining the current width and unrestricted parking on this portion of Lakeview. Our neighborhood will continue our work with the Watershed District and will focus on other strategies that will provide a more effective overall benefit to water entering the lake. We therefore urge that when the City Council corrects the plan to remove the ban on parking, it consider the opinion of the residents (and indeed the requirements of procedural due process) as well as the recommendation of Public Works, and go back to the originally designed plan with no filtration swales and a wider road that allows parking. Thank you for your attention to this very important matter. Neighbors in the Golf Terrace/Lake Harvey Neighborhood Association (see attached page for signatures) Cc: Scott Neal, City Manager Wayne Houle, City Engineer and Director of Public Works SEAL LIAR 3 0 2011 R IV D 0 0 Letter to Edina City Council March 23, 2011 Signature Page Name Address Phone _ ► v,, ,) 1 �,(�`�2�fGc'C MfZi) 72d -/6�0 . ` q700 9Sz qr_7LI -0 C(-ZO CQ 95 , Q ao Ob 2- 6, L G (� Z -, ��► -'loco �errac� G52.Gro. -I�o3 )Le z c(2-C., � s Wa O�S a- Id7 -1 W (-�3 s d' - l'r 11A - � -117177 U�- Lf 90 �a lie o - c'��, 9d7- % I'm Letter to Edina City Council March 23, 2011 Signature Page Name Address Phone c L, qjq Lex tt c c\ e e r cis z -z�s -z�( Nx G az-f S IR k%- 0 it Minutes (approved March 15, 2011) Edina Community Health Committee October 19, 2010, 6:30 — 8:30 pm Sherwood Room, Edina Senior Center Members Present: Mary Jo Kingston, Jan Johnson, Idelle Longman, Carolyn. Peterson, Students Francesca Sifferlin and John Beuerlein Members Absent: Kumar Belani, Mark Johnson, Alan Lifson Guests: Karen Zeleznak, Rose Jost, Lisa Brodsky, Sue Sheridan, Karen Stanley WELCOME & CALL TO ORDER Chair Kingston welcomed members and called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes from the September 21, 2010 meeting were unanimously approved by a'motion from Member Peterson and second from Member J. Johnson. GUEST SPEAKERS Lisa Brodsky, Bloomington Public Health Emergency Preparedness Coordinator, gave a presentation on the public health emergency preparedness services provided to the City of Edina. Key aspects include planning for ability to respond to public health emergencies, evaluating resident's ability to respond to emergencies, planning for and exercising distribution of medication, vaccines and supplies, developing and preparing methods to deliver emergency messages to the public, planning communication to reach special populations such as limited English speaking, seniors, people with disabilities, building relationships with Police, Fire and Emergency management. A volunteer Medical Reserve Corp was established and an emergency preparedness tool kit for faith based communities, Ready, Set, Go was developed. A community based tool kit for emergency preparedness is being developed. An example of public health emergency preparedness response is the recent H1N1 outbreak. Response actions included coordination with the Minnesota Department of Health, public messages regarding importance of vaccination and antiviral distribution to individuals in priority groups including those uninsured and underinsured, and organizing and conducting timely mass vaccination clinics in local schools. Karen Zeleznak, Bloomington Public Health Director, gave a presentation on the community health and nursing services they provide to the City of Edina. Ms. Zeleznak gave a historical perspective of Community Health Services (CHS) funding for city/county public health services. The designated funds must be directed to specific community health programs. Included in these services are Community Health Assessment, Adult and Senior Services, Help Me Grow Program (child development), Safety Net of Services, (qualification depends on income), Women's Health Program, Clinical and Immunization Services, Maternal Child Health, Health Promotion (targeting youth), Creating A Voice (youth assets) and Nurse Clinics (replaced Home Care Program). Also discussed were the quarterly and annual reports. Bloomington staff is involved with'the school district, the Edina Resource Center, the Edina Senior'Center, and several community groups. Ms. Zeleznak discussed the Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP), Tri -City Partners activities, community readiness for kids not doing drugs and additional information about the varied programs and their impact on the community.' Rose Jost, Bloomington Family Health Manager, reviewed efforts of Metro Alliance for Healthy Families, Help Me Grow Program and the Follow -Along Program for developing families. Ms. Jost also discussed working with youth via Tri -City Partners and Edina Sober Squad. Karen Stanley, Bloomington Disease Prevention & Control/Clinical Services Manager, presented specific information on the Women, Infants and Children program and also the Sage Screening program for breast and cervical cancer. Ms. Stanley talked about the immunization funding, immunization for a lifetime, and immunization coordination with school nurses and child care centers. Sue Sheridan, Bloomington Health Activities Supervisor, discussed her work with the Edina Seniors Program, efforts toward independent senior living, and methods to find seniors in need of assistance. Work is coordinated with Edina police, fire and health departments, local churches, family members, and adult protection for the quickest delivery of assistant to needy seniors. Chair Kingston said Bloomington Public Health is an asset to Edina providing a high level of service to all residents, young and old. The Community Health Committee fully supports the professional efforts of Bloomington Public Health and highly endorses renewing services with them for 2011. A motion was made by Member Longman and seconded by Member J. Johnson to support continuing the contract services with Bloomington Public Health for Community Health Services and also Public Health Emergency Preparedness Services for 2011. The vote was unanimous. Chair Kingston thanked Zeleznak and her staff for their presentations and for the wide variety of programs, community involvement, and excellent service they provide to the City of Edina. STATEWIDE HEALTH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Committee members received a hand out on SHIP update of health activities in Edina. Ruth Tripp, Health Specialist and SHIP Grant Coordinator from Bloomington Public Health prepared the update for the meeting. To date, efforts have been focused on schools and community and now include activities in worksites and health care settings. They are encouraging worksite employees to increase physical activity during the work day by "Energize At Work ". Local walking trail brochures have been developed and employers are encouraged to provide on -site exercise equipment for their employees. A two day Active Living Workshop is being planned and a vision for city walkability is being reviewed along with Safe Routes to School program. Day Care initiatives include the "LANA" nutrition program and "I Am Moving, I Am Learning" physical activity program. Future activities will focus on recruiting additional worksites and healthcare settings to participate in more physical activity and improved nutrition. SCHSAC ANNUAL MEETING REPORT Member Longman gave a summary of the recent SCHSAC meeting which was themed "Looking, Leading, Moving Ahead ". Topics presented at the conference included public health informatics, public health accreditation and health reform, Minnesota's "new normal" demographics, healthy workplace, mental health, and healthy eating. HEALTH STAFF REPORTS Liaison Engelman commented on the success of the new Centennial Lakes Farmers Market. Vendors will be surveyed for their ideas for improvements to the market. Comments were also made regarding Edina's status as a governor's "Fit City" and possible promotion on the City Web site with a link to SHIP initiatives. Committee members favored the idea. COMMUNITY COMMENT None presented. OTHER BUSINESS None ADJOURNMENT Motion was made by Member Longman and seconded by Member Peterson to adjourn. Vote to adjourn was unanimous. Meeting adjourned at 8:30 pm. Sherry Engelman Next Meeting: March 15, 2011 2010 Meeting Dates: March 16 May 18 September 21 October 19 • AGENDA ITEM VI. B. March 24, 2011 Members of the Edina City Council Mayor Jim Hovland ITy�, ��\ Councilmember Joni Bennett Councilmember Mary Brendle rRa Councilmember Josh Sprague 0 2011 Councilmember Ann Swanson u � Dea r Mayor and Members of the Edina City Council: Re: The Golf Terrace Roadway Improvements Project BA -355 We are writing to respectfully request that the Council reconsider a series of decisions that are contrary to the general opinion of the residents affected by the Golf Terrace project. These decisions were voted on at the March 15 Council meeting, at the conclusion of a remarkably convoluted process, without, we believe, adequate procedural due process. First, and most egregiously, the Council voted to completely prohibit parking on the section of Lakeview road lying north of Lake Harvey. The plans being considered by the Council at that meeting did not contemplate a total ban on parking. One plan proposed prohibiting parking on the lake side. One Councilmember mentioned the notion of a complete ban, but there was little, if any, discussion of it by the Council. Certainly there was no notice, much less opportunity to comment, provided the residents prior to this vote. The neighborhood strongly opposes any parking restrictions, on that street, and a total prohibition is absolutely unacceptable. We believe the opinion of the residents on this item was unknown to the Council due to the limited (and in the case of the full ban, entirely absent) opportunity to comment. When Option B (narrowed Lakeview Dr, with filtration swales) was introduced at the neighborhood informational meeting on February 22 by Public Works, there was no discussion about the elimination of parking. Had there been, our neighborhood would have strongly urged the City to either modify the plan further or go back to the original design (Option A) without filtration swales in our written response to the March Council meeting. The elimination of parking on Lakeview Dr. would cause a significant burden on residents of Lakeview Dr. and Golf Terrace who use this road for both guest and overflow parking. The prospect of numerous unsightly "No Parking" signs along that road is disagreeable both to the residents with homes there and to others in the neighborhood who enjoy walking there. The restriction or prohibition of parking on this road would have a significant negative impact on the value of our homes in this neighborhood. Given the necessity of reopening the matter to remove the parking ban, we urge the Council to go one step further and revert to Option A as it pertains to this section of road, retaining the present 26' width and unrestricted parking. Our neighborhood understands that Option B was offered in response to concerns over Lake Harvey water quality. However, as we learned for the first time at the March 151" Council meeting, the swales discussed at the February 22 open house will provide only the most nominal improvement as a percentage of water entering Lake Harvey. Our consensus opinion is that this marginal gain does not begin to justify the dramatic disruption of the parking restriction (or elimination) or the disruption to and diversion of traffic flow that the Option B approach would cause. We were not given the opportunity to express this opinion after having learned these facts. We ask the Council to consider it now. March 24, 2011 Members of the Edina City Council Mayor Jim Hovland Councilmember Joni Bennett Councilmember Mary Brendle Councilmember Josh Sprague Councilmember Ann Swanson Dear Mayor and Members of the Edina City Council: Re: The Golf Terrace Roadway Improvements Project BA -355 AGENDA ITEM VI. B. SEAS, q MAR a 01011 RE �Y I� We are writing to respectfully request that the Council reconsider a series of decisions that are contrary to the general opinion of the residents affected by the Golf Terrace project. These decisions were voted on at the March 15 Council meeting, at the conclusion of a remarkably convoluted process, without, we believe, adequate procedural due process. First, and most egregiously, the Council voted to completely prohibit parking on the section of Lakeview road lying north of Lake Harvey. The plans being considered by the Council at that meeting did not contemplate a total ban on parking. One plan proposed prohibiting parking on the lake side. One Councilmember mentioned the notion of a complete ban, but there was little, if any, discussion of it by the Council. Certainly there was no notice, much less opportunity to comment, provided the residents prior to this vote. The neighborhood strongly opposes any parking restrictions on that street, and a total prohibition is absolutely unacceptable. We believe the opinion of the residents on this item was unknown to the Council due to the limited (and in the case of the full ban, entirely absent) opportunity to comment. When Option B (narrowed Lakeview Dr, with filtration swales) was introduced at the neighborhood informational meeting on February 22 by Public Works, there was no discussion about the elimination of parking. Had there been, our neighborhood would have strongly urged the City to either modify the plan further or go back to the original design (Option A) without filtration swales in our written response to the March Council meeting. The elimination of parking on Lakeview Dr. would cause a significant burden on residents of Lakeview Dr. and Golf Terrace who use this road for both guest and overflow parking. The prospect of numerous unsightly "No Parking" signs along that road is disagreeable both to the residents with homes there and to others in the neighborhood who enjoy walking there. The restriction or prohibition of parking on this road would have a significant negative impact on the value of our homes in this neighborhood. Given the necessity of reopening the matter to remove the parking ban, we urge the Council to go one step further and revert to Option A as it pertains to this section of road, retaining the present 26' width and unrestricted parking. Our neighborhood understands that Option B was offered in response to concerns over Lake Harvey water quality. However, as we learned for the first time at the March 15`' Council meeting, the swales discussed at the February 22 open house will provide only the most nominal improvement as a percentage of water entering Lake Harvey. Our consensus opinion is that this marginal gain does not begin to justify the dramatic disruption of the parking restriction (or elimination) or the disruption to and diversion of traffic flow that the Option B approach would cause. We were not given the opportunity to express this opinion after having learned these facts. We ask the Council to consider it now. 4 Golf Terrace/Lake Harvey, continued Page 2 of 2 It is our understanding that Public Works was recommending Option A and we support this recommendation as it pertains to retaining the current width and unrestricted parking on this portion of Lakeview. Our neighborhood will continue our work with the Watershed District and will focus on other strategies that will provide a more effective overall benefit to water entering the lake. We therefore urge that when the City Council corrects the plan to remove the. ban on parking, it consider the opinion of the residents (and indeed the requirements of procedural due process) 'as well as the recommendation of Public Works, and go back to the originally designed plan with no filtration swales and a wider road that allows-parking. Thank you for your attention to this very important matter. Neighbors in the Golf Terrace/Lake Harvey Neighborhood Association (see attached page for signatures) Cc: Scott Neal, City Manager Wayne Houle, City Engineer and Director of Public Works SEAL MAR 3 0 2011 R IV D 0 Letter to Edina City Council March 23' , 2011 Signature Page 'AL � 2011 Name Address Phone f Z,) ') O'd cl—I K— gru —0 4-7000 601-P 95 D--- qf(f 2- c c,- &752 c1 ,2 Co 4?b I/ e -e- q J-,4- IJ 7 7 3 TJL rve� e,\ I -ZAZC)D T--rr- Oce-, X152 .G2-0 �vA LR e uA) Dv, c�S 4o 6 w3 C(2-C ss 4?oo Law /7 ?n xmix �IA - W 7 -s� I rfccc 4-s($ 4-s($ -e A, i�C L L,,a- V e,LA, -9 .)7- 97 -q 019 ,Letter to Edina City Council March 23, 2011 Signature Page Name Address Phone Y5-05- L�41?;-QAO C c c , e i 0 tNA. N�CORPOYL5 �y 1880 REPORURECOM MEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VI. A. -2 DEBRA MANGEN Action From: CITY CLERK Discussion Information Date: April 5, 2011 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED AFTER PACKETS INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received after the packets were delivered to you. Susan HoNvl From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 11:53 AM I ubject: March website report Good morning! Activity on the City of Edina website reflected the following activity during the month of March 2011: Total .visits: 94,404 Number of visitors: 40,243 Total number of hits: 2,939,989 Average time of each visit: 10 minutes, 53 seconds Total pageViews: 219,171 Average`page views per day: 7,557 Busiest day.of the month: March 21 with 143,577 hits The moss t visited page was the Job Listings page, with 4,428 visits. Other top pages included the following (with number of visits): City Manager Scott Neal's blog — 4,013 Communications Coordinator job listing — 2,192 Telephone Numbers & Contacts — 2,060 Adventure Peak — 2,044 Park & Recreation Department — 2,020 Administration & Jobs -- 2,016 Centennial Lakes Park —1,651 cdina Store —1,463 Edina Liquor -1,444 The most frequently accessed PDF among visitors was the Spring /Summer Park & Recreation Activities Directory, which was downloaded 3,884 times. Other frequently downloaded files included the following (with number of downloads): Winter 2011 About Town — 2,772 Employment application -- 2,630 West 70th Street landscaping concepts —1,700 Spring /Summer 2010 Park & Recreation Activities Directory— 1,612 Information on proposed zoning ordinance amendments — 11406 Bike plan —1,365 Comprehensive Plan Chapter 4 —1,222 Minnehaha Woods Feb. 10 presentation —1,037 Fall /Winter Park & Recreation Activities Directory -- 837 Ecommerce totaled $76,775.86 in March. Top sales were golf lesson registration, $18,043; Edina Aquatic Center passes, $15,501.26; Edina Art Center media studios classes, $6,996; Adventure, Peak birthday parties, $5,680; Playground program registration, $4,618; and parking permits, $4,080. We have been streaming video on our website for more than two years. The most requested videos in March were the March episode of "In Edina" (234 views), March 15 City Council meeting (94), March 1 City Council meeting (82), March episode of "Agenda: Edina" (66), March 23 Planning Commission meeting (23), March 8 Park Board (20), February-March episode of "Beyond the Badge" (20), crime rewards PSA (20), February episode of "In Edina" (13) and Feb. 23 Planning Commission eeting (23). All videos are also available on You Tube. . f The City now has Facebook pages for all of its enterprise facilities. Edinborough Park has 634 "fans." Centennial Lakes Park has ' 186. The Edina Art Center has 128. Braemar Golf Course has 124. Braemar Arena has 108. Edina Liquor has 83. The Edina Aquatic Center has 84. It is believed that the facilities' additional social media presence has driven increased traffic to their websites. Though the website has grown substantially in the past year, interest still needs to be generated among the public. To gain that interest and generate more hits, please attempt to include the Uniform Resource Locator (URL), www.CityofEdina.com, on all correspondence. Please continue to tell others about our website and think about ways to improve it. If you have suggestions or questions, please contact me. Thanks! Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications & Marketing Director 952- 833 -9520 1 Fax 952- 826 -0369 JBennerotteAci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising • Families & Doing Business 6 • Susan Howl From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Lynette Biunno Monday, April 04, 2011 8:56 AM Scott Neal Susan Howl FW: new proposal RECEIVED APR 0 4 2011 Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Scott Neal Lynette Biunno, Receptionist E —y 952-927-8861 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 l( r Ibiunno("a)ci.edina.mn.us I ~Ar.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families,& Doing Business From: Burrisjo @aol.com [mailto:Burrisjo @aol.com] Sent: Saturday, April 02, 20118:47 AM, To: Lynette Biunno Subject: new proposal Please vote NO to taking out " community comment" . This is the best way for residents to be informed on issues concerning the village of Edina. Joanne Burris, 5832 Olinger Blvd. Thankyo.u. 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: To: Monday, April 04, 2011 8:48 AM Scott Neal R EC E 9V E Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: (no subject) _ __ ft , __._ Hello there, ' This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Scott Neal. „•r= Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 i Fax 952- 826 -0389 Ibiunno(u-ci.edina.mn.us I wym-fitvnfEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Bmsiness From: FranzSr @aol.com [mailto:FranzSr @aol.com] MT..._..__ Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 5:24 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: (no subject) Please do not remove the video taped documented forum for residents at your meetings. We do not need any more secret meetings. What in the world are you folks thinking of and what is your motivation? Joanne O Burris 5832 Olinger Blvd. Susan Hi$wl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 8:54 AM Scott E Cc: Cc: Susan Howl Howl V I� � ECE Q� Subject: FW: Community comment ADD O 2011 i------ Hello there, - -- - -- This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Scott Neal. Lynette.Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 lbiunno(@ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message ----- From:,William Holden [ mailto :bill.holden @wintertulip.com] Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 10:34 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Community comment . Retain! Retain! RETAIN!!! REV William L Holden LiCSW 1 Susan Howl + From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 9:07 AM To: Scott Neal Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Community comments Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Scott Neal. ' Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(&ci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raisirrg Farnilies & Doing Business From: Lynn Hagedorn [mailto:hagedornla @aol.com] Sent: Sunday, April 03, 20119:22 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Community comments Why even consider taking them out? Lynn Hagedorn APR 0 4 2011 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 9:06 AM To: Scott Neal Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FVV: comments and pledge Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Scott Neal. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(cDci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, !.earning, Raising Families &.. Doing Business From: Joyce Mellom [mailto:jmellom @lawyer.com] Sent: Sunday, April 03, 20118:53 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: comments and pledge Dear City Manager Neal: I am in favor of keeping comments in the regular meeting and on camera. ra RECEWED I APR 0 4 2011 i I am not in favor of saying the pledge of allegiance at the start of a city council meeting. Decorum and respect can be imposed by a gavel and call to order. I note that the pledge of allegiance is not said at the start of courtroom proceedings. Thank you. Joyce Mellom Attorney at Law PO Box 24068 Minneapolis, MN 55424 Tel: (952) 920 -3002 Fax: (952) 915 -4413 www.MellomLawOffice.com imellom @lawyer.com The information transmitted herein is intended only for the addressee and may contain confidential information, proprietary and /or privileged material. Any unauthorized review, distribution or other use of or taking any action in reliance upon this information is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail en error, please contact the sender and delete or destroy the message and all copies. 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 9:11 AM To: Scott Neal Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Community comments issue Hello there, APR 0 4 2011 This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Scott Neal. -< .. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-8861 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 Ibiunnonaci.edina.mn.us I wAw.CityofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: JC331 @aol.com [mailto:JC331 @aol.com] ..�._..�_� } _. .-. ..�......_._�.._._.�._._.Wa�.M Sent: Monday, April 04, 20117:14 AM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: barbarahoganson @comcast.net Subject: Community comments issue Dear City Council, The suggestion that the Community Comments portion of the regularly scheduled City Council meetings be changed is absolutely the wrong direction that our City should be evolving. It is already difficult enough for a citizen to be heard and fellow citizens to hear what other residents have to say regarding City issues. With the advent of the Internet and the fast changing delivery of media, I and some of my elderly family members and friends are finding it more and more difficult to follow our City government actions. More transparency not less is the path to a better representative government. A government that listens at every chance to the citizens and taxpayers of Edina and allows our City Council members to decide the future of Edina. Sincerely, Dr. Jane and Jay Carroll ,S6san Hbwl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Friday, April 01'; 2011 8:42 AM Susan Howl Su RECEIVED— Subject: FW: For City Council Members APR 0 4 3011 Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunnoaci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com j • ` ...Fpr Livi ng, Learning, Raising Far flies & Doing Business. From: Kathy Dahlheimer [ mailto:kdahiheimer @comcast.net] Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 7:59• AM To :1ynette Biunno Subject: For City Council Members As I understand it there is a possibility that based on City Manager Neal's suggestion public comment may be taken out of the meetings, done prior to the meeting and not be recorded. Maybe I'm missing something but one of the reasons given was some people don't want to speak in front of a camera ... I would be one of those people for sure. I have the option of emailing, calling or writing via mail to state a concern, ask a question etc. I have always found council members receptive and if they cannot handle the inquiry they send it to those that can. So why would we take away public comment? Also there was mention of those that "will only speak on camera ". Well I get the implication here and have seen those "regulars" but I think Mayor Hovland does an excellent job of sorting out those of value, those just wanting camera time and most importantly those that will have their own public hearing. Really that public comment time just does not take that much time. In-fact putting it at the beginning of the meeting might be better as with some of the meetings these people are sitting there for hours, many with maybe something important to say have to leave (especially older residents or with kids),I see no value in removing that from the regular meeting. Thank you. Kathleen Dahlheimer, 4801 West 60th Street, Edina, Mn. 55424 10 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 3:44 PM To: Scott Neal Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Public comments at City Council meetings Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Scott Neal. =•� Lynette Biunno, Receptionist <31 952-927-8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 IbiunnoC@_ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com -' ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Bert Finsand [mailto:bert@finsand.com] Sent: Friday, April 01, 20113:30 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Public comments at City Council meetings RECfEOVE APR 0.4 2011 I just heard that you want to take away the public comments portion of city council meetings; is this true? If so shame on you! You are elected to serve the public; the same public that you need to hear from! Mr. Neal is obviously not a concerned or involved resident of Edina. What a disgrace! Very disappointed in all of you for even giving this a hearing. If this really was Mr. Neal's doing you should seriously consider his immediate dismissal. I know he is brand new on this job but this is really ridiculous! If he's this brazen after only a short period of time can you even imagine what silly thoughts will come from him in the future? If there is even one vote in favor of this I can hardly wait until other residents start lining up to challenge you. They will get our vote for sure! Amy and Bert Finsand f 1' Susan Howl :rom: Joe Wessling [ mailto:joewessling @hotmail.com] "Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011.3:39 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: City Council Assistance Needed Dear Mayor Hovland and Respected City Council Members, As a resident of Edina, I appreciate the fact that our City Council takes all steps necessary to limit, bureaucratic procedures to maintain what in reality Edina is - a small community within our greater metro area. With.that being said, I need and am requesting your help on an issue pertaining to the City of Edina Assessors Office. Please see the e-mail exchange between me and Adrienne Garcia from the City of Edina Assessors Office. Adrienne cannot help me due to an internal procedure that makes zero sense in this case and I am being penalized financially as a result. If Bob Wilson were to be contacted to see if a common sense solution can be reached in this case, I would be grateful. With kind regards, Joe Wessling 6301 York Ave South ,# 102 Edina, MN 55435 From: joewessling @hotmail.com To: agarcia @ci.edina.mn.us Subject: RE: Regarding PIN: 29- 028 -24 -21 -0113 )ate: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 15:15:51 -0500 With all due respect Adrienne — this is INSANE! This makes ZERO sense. i t You already know all of the facts, you've acknowledged that my case has merit, but you won't do the right thing unless I request you to do so on a specific form? This entire situation is due to Moreau Sankey, your former colleague, but a fellow Appraiser at the Assessors Office all the same. Therefore, it was the Assessors Office who created this mess and now I need to spend money and time to have you consider doing what is right via a petition? That defies ALL logic, is beyond bureaucratic and is simply stupid. If you cannot correct this individually, please have Bob Wilson contact me. If he provides the same insane answer, I'll print off all of our e- mails, make an appointment to see James Hovland and see if the Mayor can make any sense of this "procedure ". Please reply and thanks in advance for your time. Respectfully, Joe Wessling 760- 703 -0413 Subject: RE: Regarding PIN: 29- 028 -24 -21 -0113 Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 14:53:42 -0500 From: agarcia @ci.edina.mn.us To: joewessling @hotmail.com I would be assigned your case if you do file. But there is absolutely nothing that can be done without a tax petition. You can speak with Bob Wilson, my boss, the City Assessor who will tell you the same thing. His phone number is (952) 826- 0426. If and when I receive the petition I will contact you about making a reduction. Thank you, Adrienne Adrienne Garcia, AMA, Appraiser 952 - 826 -0423 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 agarcia@ci.edina.mn.us I http: /twww.cityofedina.com /Assessing ; µ - ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Joe Wessling [mailto:joewessling @hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 20112:46 PM To: Adrienne Garcia Subject: RE: Regarding PIN: 29- 028 -24 -21 -0113 Hello Ms. Garcia, If I were to file a property tax petition by May 2 "d, who determines if a reduction can be okayed? It only makes sense that it would be approved by the Assessors Office and you are the Appraiser within the Assessors Office assigned to my home. If you need to escalate this matter to your Department Head or to whoever graces the top of the Assessors Office totem pole, I would be grateful. It makes zero sense that I would be overcharged for a third consecutive year when clearly there is a path to stopping the madness right now. The correct and fair 2010 Assessment matches the 2011` Assessment of $70,400. Again, if that could be implemented now, I'll just live with the fact that I have been overcharged for over two years. My case has merit and you've acknowledged that it has merit. Please do the right thing and amend the 2010 Assessed Value to $70,400 or escalate this matter to your Department Head or to whoever graces the, top of the Assessors Office totem pole if you individually cannot. Please reply and thanks in advance,foryour time. Respectfully, Joe Wessling 760- 703 -0413 Subject: RE: Regarding PIN: 29- 028 -24 -21 -0113 Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 14:31:39 -0500 From: aqarcia@ci.eclina.mn.us To: joewessling@hotmail.com Hello, The state law only allows appeals to the current year's taxes by April 301h of that year. So that is why it is still possible to file a petition for 2010 assessment for this year's taxes. Any prior years do not have any recourse. Unfortunately, I don't understand why Moreau did not make further reductions to the value for the 2009 and 2010 based on your purchase price in 2008. 1 understand the frustration, and agree that prior years were too high .... if it was at all possible for me to make a change I would. All I can recommend is to pay attention to all the statements with notice of valuation and taxes when they arrive. They all have time constraints, and if there are any errors or concerns it needs to be addressed immediately. Sincerely, Adrienne Adrienne Garcia, AMA, Appraiser 952 - 826 -0423 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 c agarcia(fti.edina.mn.us I http: //www.cityofedina.com /Assessinq ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Joe Wessling [mailto:joewessling @hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 12:30 PM To: Adrienne Garcia Subject: RE: Regarding PIN: 29- 028 -24 -21 -0113 Hello Ms. Garcia, Is there a statute of limitations on how far back to include in the filing since I've been over - charged since 2008? If so, three months in 2008, all of 2009 and 2010 would be included. It doesn't make sense to go through all of this for $138, but it- might if I can go back to the beginning since Moreau Sankey' had it assessed ridiculously high from the start. ,'his all could be avoided if the correct and fair 2010 Assessment reduction to match the 2011 Assessment of $70,400 could be implemented now and I'll just live with the fact that I have been overcharged for over two years. Please reply and thanks in advance for your time. Respectfully, Joe Wessling 760- 703 -0413 Subject: RE: Regarding PIN: 29- 028 -24 -21 -0113 Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2011 11:49:52 -0500 From: agarcia@ci.edina.mn.us To: joewesslingaa hotmail.com Dear Mr. Wessling, I've been out of the office this morning and just received your voice message and email. I am new to working with these condominiums so have pulled your file and looked at the values for the past few years. It appears that you spoke with Moreau Sankey back in 2009, and the value was reduced to the $95,100. 1 also noticed that the value for 2010 is also $95,100. Unfortunately, I am unable to change the value for 2010. It would have to be appealed last Spring for the assessor to make any changes. At this point the only option for that value to change is by filing a property tax petition by May 2 "d The instructions for filing a petition are located at: http : / /www.hennepinattorney.org/ Divisions/ AdministrationCiviI /TaxPetitions /tabid /58 /DefauIt.aspx Your property could be filed in small claims court with a filing fee of $162 since it is valued less than $300,000. I went ahead and did a tax calculation of the difference between your taxes based on the $95,100 versus $70,000, and it comes out to around $300. It's up to you whether or not to file the petition for a gain of $138 in taxes. I know this isn't the response you wanted, but my hands are tied. If there are any questions about the current assessment or any future assessments then I would be able to help you. Sincerely, Adrienne Garcia �Adri enne Garcia, AMA, Appraiser 952 - 826 -0423 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 agarciaCd dedina.mn.us I http: /twww.citvofedina.com /Assessing � ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Joe Wessling [mailto:joewessling @hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 11:14 AM To: Adrienne Garcia Subject: Regarding PIN: 29- 028 -24 -21 -0113 Regarding PIN: 29- 028 -24 -21 -0113 (6301 York Ave South #102, Edina, MN 55435) Dear Adrienne Garcia, I purchased this property in 2008 for $70,000. My first property tax bill was based upon a value assessed by Moreau Sankey that was ridiculously high (exceeding $100,000). When I presented Mr. Sankey with comparables that clearly illustrated that his assessed value was WAY too high, the assessed value was reduced to $95,100 last year. Mr. Sankey made a move in the right direction, but $95,100 is clearly still too high because if I could have sold the property in an arms - length transaction for $95,100, you would not be reading this e-mail because I would have sold the property. My newest assessed value is truly realistic as the 2011 Notice of Valuation has it in the neighborhood of where 'I purchased it at $70,400. Clearly, my property did not decline in value by the 26% difference represented between the two assessed values of $95,100 and $70,400. Mr. Sankey simply had assessed the value to significantly exceed market value in the first place and this has finally (and thankfully) been corrected. I could spend the time, money and effort to prove what we both already know, but I have already overpaid due to over- assessed values, for two years already and frankly, I have been needlessly penalized as a result. Please review this matter and strongly consider my appeal for a 2010 Assessment reduction to match the fair 2011 Assessment of $70,400. Please reply and thanks in advance for your time. Respectfully, Joe Wessling 760- 703 -0413 5 .0 a Statewide Health Improvement Program "W` ISIQN March, 2011 In this issue Community Initiatives • Farmers markets coming up in Bloomington, Edina and Richfield — new location for Richfield • Interested in starting a community garden? • SHIP community garden training opportunities for youl • Bloomington, Edina and Richfield childcare centers and preschools lead the way to better health and lower health care costs • From Richfield Patch.com: "Richfield Bicycle Task Force to Examine Effectiveness of Proposed Routes" School Initiatives • Edina Creek Valley Elementary first grade class moves to learn • Parents, you can give Richfield children a chance for better health • Richfield Public Schools Food Service makes healthier school meals a reality • School garden gives Bloomington Oak Grove Middle School an opportunity for growth SHIP Help us make our community better for our health! Share this eNewsletter with a friend. Join the SHIP eNewsletter mailing list. Reminder: Check our SHIP website for updates and current events. Community Initiatives Farmers markets coming up in Bloomington, Edina and Richfield — new location for Richfield Get ready to go. Dates for the 2011 farmers market season are set. For full details, check the web links below. New for Richfield residents, the Satellite Farmers Market location can't be missed. The wall along its location last year in Roosevelt Park put the market out of sight for passersby. Its new location across the street at the Church of the Assumption will place the market in full view and easier to find. All these farmers markets make it easier for everyone to enjoy the health benefits of easy access to locally grown produce (Richfield Farmers Market pictured at right). Ba Richfield Farmers Market website May 7 - October 29 Saturdays, 7 a.m. to 12 p.m. (opens 8 a.m. in October) Richfield Satellite Farmers Market website Church of the Assumption (new location) June 3— August 26, 2011 Fridays, 2:00 — 6:00 p.m. Bloomington Farmers Market website Bloomington Civic Plaza — East Lot June 11 — October 15, 2011 Saturdays, 8:00 a.m. — 1:00 p.m. Indoor market dates: November 12 and December 10, 2011 from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m. Centennial Lakes Farmers Market v; ebsite June 16 - September 29, 2011 Thursdays, 3:00 - 7:00 p.m. Interested in starting a community garden? Bloomington Public Health (BPH) is pleased to announce the availability of start-up funds for organizations to support the development of new or expanded community gardens located in Bloomington, Edina and Richfield and serving residents of those cities. . Applications are due on April 4, 2011. . Applicants may request up to $2,000. . BPH anticipates awarding 7 grants. . Funding is made possible by the Statewide Health Improvement Program. a a The BPH Community Garden Fund Guidelines and Application can be found on our SHIP website here. For more information, contact Sueling Schardin at sschardin @ci.bloomington.mn.us. Back SHIP community garden training opportunities for you! If you are interested in attending any of these workshops, please RSVP online at http : / /www.surveymonkey.com /s /commu nitygardenworkshops Recruitment, Gardener Engagement and Group Decision - Making This hands -on workshop teaches the skills you need to create and maintain strong, vibrant and sustainable community gardens including a consensus- building workshop that you can replicate with your garden group. Share your ideas, struggles and recruitment strategies with other community gardeners dealing with the same issues. Be prepared to laugh out loud, be inspired and leave with a few tricks of the trade to use for the coming spring and summer in your community garden. Saturday, April 16, 2011 9:00 a.m. — 12:00 p.m. Bloomington Civic Plaza — Haeg Conference Room (2nd Floor) 1800 W. Old Shakopee Rd., Bloomington, MN 55431 Garden Site Design Community gardens have many uses beyond growing food and flowers! Learn fun, environmentally - friendly design tools to help make your community garden a safe, welcoming, gathering place that promotes neighborhood identity and connections. This workshop is an interactive workshop on basic design principles with a focus on gathering, safety, movement and ecology in community spaces. Workshop includes discussion and examples. Tuesday, April 19, 2010 6:00 — 7:30 p.m. Southdale Library — Helen Young Room (2nd Floor) 7001 York Ave. S., Edina, 55435 Growing Vegetables Put those fears aside about growing your own vegetables, and get your green thumb going! This workshop will cover what to plant - when and where, preparing your soil, how to minimize disease and insect damage, techniques to reduce the need for pesticides and more. Thursday, April 21, 2010 7:00 — 9:30 p.m. Civic Plaza — Rehearsal Hall 1800 W. Old Shakopee Rd., Bloomington, MN 55431 Back i a Bloomington, Edina and Richfield childcare centers and preschools lead the way to better health and lower health care costs It is possible to achieve a higher quality of life and lower health care costs in Minnesota by reducing obesity in the state. A key to this challenge is preventing weight gain from the start when eating habits are formed. Since October of 2009, staff from SHIP has trained staff in 51 licensed childcare and preschool facilities to establish healthy eating habits in children (picture at right). Success of the cost - effective SHIP initiative lies in a proven curriculum, nationally recognized nutrition best practices and a follow -up process. After one year, 55 percent of the initial group of 22 facilities 7 t 7 achieved at least 3 best practice changes. Ten facilities �'..w.. improved or adopted a new nutrition policy, and many more are in the process of making changes. These and future results will help us achieve the goal of reducing obesity. Back From RichfieldPatch.com: "Richfield Bicycle Task Force to Examine Effectiveness of Proposed Routes" A Richfield Patch. com article reported on progress of the Richfield Bicycle Master Plan Task Force. At their last meeting,Task Force members were instructed how to score proposed routes for effectiveness based on connectivity, operations and physical infrastructure. Task Force Members will look for gaps in the plan to make sure all types of cyclists are fairly served. The scores will assist with prioritizing routes for future project planning. For further explanation, read the article on RichfieldPatch.com. To learn more about Richfield's Master Bicycle Plan or to get involved, visit their web page. Back School Initiatives Edina Creek Valley Elementary first grade class moves to learn We want our children to learn well so they will have a bright future. For some young children, however, the struggle to sit still creates shortened attention spans, more distractions and less learning in school. Physical activity and learning go hand in hand, so SHIP assisted a first grade class at Creek Valley to replace stationary chairs with stools to allow them more movement during class. Giving children the opportunity to move more can improve their attention spans so they will learn better. It will also increase their physical activity to promote better health. Back • Parents, you can give Richfield children a chance for better health Children who walk or bike to school are more physically active and have better overall health. Physical activity also enhances learning. Are you a parent who has interest in learning more about children walking and biking to school? Join other parents to discuss this issue and how we can make improvements and encourage walking and biking to school. For example, we can talk about safety concerns and ways to overcome them so more children may walk or bike to school. SHIP staff is ready to facilitate this group at their convenience. Time, location, and length of participation in this group will be determined by what works best for the parents. The City has already made some improvements with Safe Routes to School programs that make walking and biking to school easier and safer. At Richfield Middle School, sidewalks and parking lot access on West 75th Street were improved. New bike racks were installed at Richfield STEM, Centennial, Sheridan Hills, and Richfield High School. Your input is invaluable! The small amount of time given to share your ideas will make a big difference in the future for children. If you are interested in learning more, please contact Robyn Wiesman, Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP) Community Liaison, rwiesman @ci.bloomington.mn.us Back Richfield Public Schools Food Service makes healthier school meals a reality Students often consume up to 50% of their calories at school, so school meals clearly impact students' health. To assure a positive impact, SHIP assisted Richfield Schools Food Service to improve the nutritional quality of school meals through cooking techniques, marketing strategies and a computerized nutrient analysis program. These solutions assure a standard of nutritional value is met and that students choose to eat the healthy foods. Recently, the schools' food service completed nutritional analyses of all Richfield school menus through February 2011 and posted them on the District Food Services website. Parents can easily obtain the information, and school nurses have found the information makes.it easier to help students with special diet needs. The nutrient analysis program has also allowed the schools' food service to decrease sodium and limit overall fat content of meals to 30% or less of calories - with no more than 10% of these from saturated fat. They have also increased the fiber content of grain options. These outcomes are ongoing practices that will provide continued health benefits to Richfield students for years to come. As healthy students, it,.will be easier to concentrate on their work, attend school on a regular basis and perform better in class. Back School garden gives Bloomington Oak Grove Middle School an opportunity for growth According to Principal - - Brian Ingemann, Oak y Grove Middle School is Soririg 21 excited to get down and dirty. The school is looking forward to planting their own vegetable garden this spring. It will be a great opportunity for students to experience the growing, harvesting and sharing of their own food. Students will be connecting this work with their academic studies in both 7th grade science and 6th, 7th and 8th grade family consumer science.: In addition to a learning experience, growing ,a garden can improve healthy eating and provide an opportunity for outdoor exercise. As such, it is a SHIP strategy to reduce chronic disease risk factors. To be successful, a school garden requires a well- coordinated effort from people who will champion the cause. With SHIP support, Oak Grove Middle School has several. They are Principal Brian Ingemann, the Wellness Committee, and teachers Pam Ludvigsen and Steve Olson. Their effort will provide an opportunity for growth beyond vegetables. It's an opportunity for a better, healthier future. If you'd like to get involved with the Oak Grove Middle School garden, contact Principal Brian Ingeman at 952 - 681 -6650. For information, you may also contact Principal Ingemann or SHIP Liaison, Kate Maher, at 952 - 681 -6514. Back 0 Statewide Health Improvement Program 'tIN~' ~ " -rAs Vk15.S1.0N Stdtr«idr Pn A HrtG /� SHIP lnt�rrrn emrru ruu Community Resource List Physical City Parks and Recreation Activity Outdoor walking, jogging, biking, swimming, disc golf, baseball, softball, soccer, basketball, tennis, cross - country skiing, snowshoeing, and ice skating. • Bloomington: 952- 563 -8877 http: // www .ci.bloomington.mn.us /cityhaII/ dept /commsery /parkrec /parkrec.htm • Edina: 952-826-0367 http: / /www.ci.edina .mn.us /ParksAndFacilities /12 -03 Park FaciIities.htm • Richfield: 612 - 861 -9395 http: / /www.cityofrichfield.org /Recreation /index.htm County and State Parks and Trails Outdoor walking, jogging, biking, hiking, and cross - country skiing. • Three Rivers Parks District: 763 - 559 -9000 www.threeriversparks.org • Hyland Lake Park Reserve, Bloomington: 763 - 694 -7687 • Minnesota Valley National Wildlife Refuge: 952- 854 -5900 http://Www.fws.gov/ idwest/minnesotavalley/ Community Education Services Bloomington and Richfield • Community Ed Classes: 952 - 681 -6132 http:// bloomington.registryinsight.com Adult aquatics, fitness, and wellness classes, open /lap swimming. • Bloomington Activity Centers at Bloomington Public High Schools www. bloom inRtonschools.info Low -cost membership to weight room, indoor track, basketball court. Kennedy Activity Center (KAC): 952 - 681 -5280 Jefferson Activity Center: 952 - 806 -7880 Edina • Community Ed Classes: 952 - 848 -3952 http: / /www.edina.kl2.mn.us /community Indoor Walking Area malls are available for indoor walking during business hours • Mall of America Mall Stars Walking Program: 612 - 866 -0850 • Tracking and reports of accumulated walking time, monthly meetings, incentives, and mall discounts for $15 annual fee. Physical Edinborough Park 952 - 833 -9540 Activity 7700 York Avenue South, Edina Cont. http: / /www.edinboroughpark.com /content /facilities / edinborough park/ • Swimming pool, indoor track, and fitness area. • Daily admission $6, 10 -punch pass $50 YMCA — Southdale 952 - 835 -2567 7355 York Avenue South, Edina www.Vmcatwincities.org /locations /southdale.asp • Pools, open gym, weights, cardio machines, classes, etc. • Discounts and scholarships available • Tri -City Skatepark for skateboarding is open to non - members with discounts for Bloomington, Edina and Richfield residents • SilverSneakers: Exercise and wellness program for older adults Northwestern Health Sciences University 2501 West 84�h Street, Bloomington • Aquatics Classes: One Month $30; 4 Months $90; One Year $250 952 - 888 -4777, ext. 101 or email aquatics @nwhealth.edu • SilverSneakers: Exercise and wellness program for older adults, 952 - 885 -5406 Healthy Farmers Markets Foods • Bloomington Civic Plaza — East Lot: Saturdays, 8:00 a.m. — 1:00 p.m. WIC Fruit and Vegetable Vouchers accepted www.ci.bloomington.mn.us /market • Edina — Centennial Lakes Park: Thursdays, 3:00 — 7:00 p.m. www.CentennialLakesPark.com • Richfield — www.richfieldfarmersmarket.org • Veterans Memorial Park: Fridays, 2:00 p.m. — 6:00 p.m. • Roosevelt Park: Saturdays, 7:00 a.m. —12:00 p.m. Fare For All • Fresh produce and frozen meat at 30 -40% savings http:// www. emergencyfoodshelf .org /OurFamilyOfPrograms /ffa/ • Express packages (no pre- order) available at various sites in the metro • Pre - ordered packages available at Creekside Community Center, 9802 Penn Avenue South, Bloomington, 952- 563 -4944 Hennepin County Food Support Program 612 - 596 -1300 www.hennepin.us /portal /site /`HennepinUS / • Helps people with low- income access nutritious food. Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Program 952 -563 -8933 • Food vouchers and nutrition information for eligible pregnant women and children ages 0 -5. Healthy Supplemental Food Programs 651 - 484 -8241 Foods www.health. state .mn.us /divs /fh /csfp.index.html cont. • Mothers & Children (MAC) • For qualifying pregnant women and children not on WIC. • Nutrition Assistance for Program Seniors (NAPS) VEAP Food Pantry 952 - 888 -9616 9728 Irving Avenue South, Bloomington www.veapvolunteers.org /services /food - program • Call 5 -7 days in advance for an appointment to receive a five -day supply of food, including non - perishables, protein, fresh produce, and dairy. Healthy Weight Watchers 1- 800 - 651 -6000 Lifestyle and www. weightwatchers .com /util /mtf /index.aspx Weight • Support for losing and maintaining weight. Management • Fee for enrollment, meetings through employers are often free. Diabetes Prevention Program: I CAN Prevent Diabetes www.icanpreventdiabetes.org /index /html • Diabetes prevention education and support. Overeaters Anonymous 1- 888 - 540 -1212 www. overeaters .org /localmeetings.html • Free 12 -step support group. Arthritis Foundation North Central Chapter 1- 800 - 333 -1380 www.arthritis.org/ chapters /north - central /programs.php • Exercise and Aquatics Programs Normandale Center for Healing and Wholeness 952 - 929 -1697 6100 Normandale Road, Edina http: / /healing.normIuth.org/ • Activity, stretching, and health promotion classes for older adults Tobacco QUITPLAN Helpline 1- 888 -354 -PLAN www.guitplan.com Cessation • Professional phone and online counseling • Free nicotine - replacement lozenges, patches, or gum. • Available in Spanish and TTY. Interpreters available for other languages. Nicotine Anonymous 952 - 404 -1488 www.nicotineanonymous.org /standard search.php • Free 12 -step support group • Local meetings held at Christ Presbyterian Church 6901 Normandale Road, Edina Smoke Free Housing 651 - 646 -3005 www.mnsmokefreehousing.org • Smoke -Free Housing Directory; help for renters with second -hand smoke problems. Alcohol Alcoholics Anonymous Greater Minneapolis 952 - 922 -0800 Dependency www.aaminneapoIis.org/ pages /meeting /LocationIndex.asp Support • Free 12 -step support group. Databases United Way 2 -1 -1 and • Information on food shelves, food service, food distribution programs, inpatient and Directories of outpatient services for tobacco and alcohol cessation, fitness and community Resources centers. Multilingual lines available. Minnesota Help. Info 1- 800 - 333 -2433 www. min nesota help. info • Directory of services for seniors, people with disabilities, veterans, parents and families, and low income people. • Information on food assistance and meals, alcohol dependency, tobacco cessation, physical activity, and weight related support groups. Health Plan Contact your health plan for other health and wellness services, such as health coaching, Resources weight management, exercise planning, and nutrition information. CITY OF BLOOMINGTON MINNESOTA k e MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members FROM: Cary Teague, Planning Director SUBJECT: Back of Packet Information — Planning Commission actions from their March 23, 2011 regular meeting. DATE: April 5, 2011 INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission took action on the items listed below at their March 23, 2011 Regular meeting. These items will be on April 19, 2011 City Council agenda for consideration. • Conditional Use Permit —.Connie Carrino and Jeff Miller (4509 Garrison. Lane)c The _ request .is to tear down and rebuild a new home with a first floor elevation greater than one foot. above the existing first floor elevation. • Sketch. Plan Review — Ed Noonan (4528 & 4530 France Avenue). Mr. Noonan is requesting a. Sketch Plan, Review to consider a. proposal to tear down the existing building at 4530 France Avenue, and build an addition above the existing garage at. 4528 France Avenue that would match the existing building on the lot. This property is located within an area of the City that is designated as a "Potential Area of Change" within the 2008 Comprehensive Plan. The . Comprehensive Plan states that within the. Potential Areas of Change, "A development proposal that involves a Comprehensive Plan Amendment or a rezoning will require a Small'Area Plan study prior to planning application. However, the authority to initiate a Small Area Plan rests with the City Council." The City Council will therefore, be asked whether a Small Area Plan should be initiated. CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY for: COLLEGE CITY DESIGN BUILD, INC. DESCRIBED AS: Lot 7, Block 2, MILLER'S ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota. ADDRESS: 4509 Garrison Lane, Edina, MN - 66 .2 ' � ENE U 5 N 69 39 T 91 lap, $ ya, PR(5POSED RETAINING r^ c WALL, 3.5' MAX. HEIGHT / 9G Crg i o n� B73.1 /g69 �1P. fir^ 3 r m a � \ o GARAGE 873.0 / P0 10\T E 7/-/-/77777/ EXISTING HOUSE GARAGE - CHANGED HOUSE i GARAGE 8724 PROPOSED X0674.9 FFE LOWE1t 887.2 HOUSE (WO) sttED - CONC PATIO DECK �— 867.7 Ro�oS i5 P PROPOSED ELEVATIONS -� Z •4 Maple Garage Floor of drive = 875.1 ncc a t�- I I 1 I 1 c I Top of Foundation 7. 875.5 Existing Contour Floor = Lowest Floor = 667.8 I� Surface Drainage First Floor - 877.31 �p - - -- Drain. and Utility Ease. N Monument Found SETBACK REQUIREMENTS Monument Set Front = 30 feet or average setback of moo° Coniferous Tree od)ocent houses. House to west is / Proposed House setback 29.0 ft. and the house to the & Geroge east is setback 30.8. Therefore, the overage setback of the adjacent the and front setback for this house is 29.9 feet Rear (from NWL Elev. 863) = 50 feet Side House 10 feet Slid: Garage a 5 feet BENCHMARK TNH AT NW CDR. WOODDALE & GARRISION ELEV. 875.89 (NGVD29) AREA 8 BUILDING COVERAGE Lot Area - 18,025 s% ft. Water Area = 7632 sq. ft. Areo for Coverage Cdc. _ 10,393 sq. ft. Existing Coverage House & garage - 1801 sq. ft. = 17.3% LOT CORNER -, IN WATER r Proposed Coverooe House & garage - 2548 sq. ft. = 24.5% Maximum allowable building coverage is 25% or 2598 sq. ft. - CHANGED HOUSE i GARAGE 8724 PROPOSED X0674.9 FFE LOWE1t 887.2 HOUSE (WO) sttED - CONC PATIO DECK EXISTING HOUSE I L Lj `�.l ople 7 Z% ro E L 1l,_ BOULDER WALL TIMBER WALL NY& ELEV. 863.0 AT WATER LINE WATER ELEV. 864.2 AS OF 4/12/10 F,0 NO UTILITIES UTILITIES EASEMENT -, 58.59 S89e44 �5 EDGE OF WATER I - 1 EDGE OF WATER / CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Curtiss J. Kollio, Lic. No. 26909 Date F1 ri U4 Assumed Bearings 0 30 Scale in Feet 1 I I I i5 T b LEGEND G •4 Maple � ncc a t�- I I 1 I 1 c I EXISTING HOUSE I L Lj `�.l ople 7 Z% ro E L 1l,_ BOULDER WALL TIMBER WALL NY& ELEV. 863.0 AT WATER LINE WATER ELEV. 864.2 AS OF 4/12/10 F,0 NO UTILITIES UTILITIES EASEMENT -, 58.59 S89e44 �5 EDGE OF WATER I - 1 EDGE OF WATER / CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Curtiss J. Kollio, Lic. No. 26909 Date F1 ri U4 Assumed Bearings 0 30 Scale in Feet 7EDGE r R �'s 4� S00 BITUMINOUS ?3eQS KALLIO Engineering Inc. 10775 Poppltz Lane ph: 612 -418 -6828 Chaska, MN 55318 fax: 952- 400 -8492 JOB NO.: 1 010 IS1fN6 SST doR 4AtioN 1T4.9 v �� 3r LEGEND XX.X Proposed Elevation XXX.X Existing Elevation - -869 -- Existing Contour Proposed Contour —� Surface Drainage 11 Offset Hub or Spike - - -- Drain. and Utility Ease. • Monument Found O Monument Set Deciduous Tree Coniferous Tree Proposed House & Geroge 7EDGE r R �'s 4� S00 BITUMINOUS ?3eQS KALLIO Engineering Inc. 10775 Poppltz Lane ph: 612 -418 -6828 Chaska, MN 55318 fax: 952- 400 -8492 JOB NO.: 1 010 IS1fN6 SST doR 4AtioN 1T4.9 v �� h ® Ordinance Amendments — The Planning Commission recommends two Zoning Ordinance Amendments as part of the Commission's work on the Zoning Ordinance Update. The amendments are as follows: 1. Side Yard Setback exception for properties designated within the Heritage Landmark District. The Ordinance exempts these properties from the side yard setback requirement that requires a setback increase based on height. The purpose of the amendment is to encourage to reconstruction of Colonial Style housing within the Country Club District. o 2. Zoning Board of Appeals. An Ordinance Amendment that establishes the Planning Commission as the Zoning Board of .Appeals. ATTACHMENTS: Plans for 4509 Garrison Lane Sketch Plan for 4528 & 4530 France Avenue r 2 Pro- p 0 -S ed s'E�eet Pf�S�ec��� PLANNING DEPARTMENT >=EB 2 8 2011 CITY OF EDINA S �C.!�r•� ep. 9 IN F.t. Aerial view from west - 4 Jor � r 11�F' 0 . I ... 1.... . L . . . 1... J. .. .1.... r� 31 STALLS TOTAL a I z.•t awrov+ .rs�ifa ' F^Nlu .fdotf-0' m &9� ��..... 6 en[ 660060.6. E&WV 6: — TM boWbC .646 K 6. tow odr) w --TTr. Yr. Tr 7 : U er Level Plan N Lower Level Plon �7.avd, �d Proposed Plans 4528 & 4530 France Avenue South Edina, MN 55424 VETERANS MEMORIAL COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES FROM FEBRUARY 11, 2011 The following are Minutes from the Veterans Memorial Committee held in the Mayor's Conference Room at City Hall on Friday, February 11, 2011 at 7:30 am Volunteers in attendance: Chairman Mike Goergen, Frank Cardarelle, Bob Benson, Marshall Schwartz, Robert Reed, Justin Kieffer, Jason Christiaansen Volunteers unable to attend: Bob'Kojetin, John Lonsbury, Barbara Bender, Herb Lefler Staff in attendance: Janet' Canton, Edina Park and Recreation Office Coordinator I. APPROVAL OF THE DECEMBER, 17.2010 MINUTES Frank Cardarelle MOVED TO APPROVE THE DECEMBER 17, 2010 VETERANS MEMORIAL COMMITTEE MINUTES. Marshall Schwartz SECONDED THE MOTION. II. INITIAL DESIGN MEETING — Mr. Kost asked the committee members to introduce and talk about themselves for a little bit as well as state;their military background and if they were in a conflict to specify which one. Mr. Kost explained to'the committee that for today's meeting they will mostly be listening so that they can gather information and start to pull some ideas together so that they can get a vision, and sense of what they are doing with the memorial design. Mr. Kost showed the committee photographs of all different types of Veterans Memorials. He asked the committee if they knew what direction they might want to go because getting an artist. together and getting someone to do a figure can run some big dollars. He stated that most memorials have typically used an infantry person because they are representative of all of the services'. Mr. Goergen indicated that their next primary goal is going to. be to try to decide what they want as their focus point item since they have not yet discussed whether it will be a figure or something symbolic. He asked what it would cost to have a figure or some piece of artwork to which Mr. Kost replied that he would guess it to be somewhere between $50,000 and $100,000 of your budget. He noted that it really depends on size and how many figures: He stated that the more life -like and figurative pieces tend to generally be a little more expensive than something that's a little more modern and kind of abstract. 1 Mr. Kost pointed out that you will see that another piece to the different memorials is that they tend to be fairly conceptual and tell a story, there is always a lot of symbolism to these memorials. He noted that this is why your stories and stories of other veterans in Edina are important so that they can start to think about how they represent that symbolically. He pointed out that these are places people go to every year for a ceremony and often people will go to these multiple times and don't necessarily have to get it the first time, there are other things that people can learn as they come back. Mr. Kost informed the committee that if they want to put names and inscriptions on some sort of tablet they want to make sure there is some sort of flexibility. Unfortunately, they will probably have to be updated at some time in the future. Mr. Schwartz stated that in his opinion the whole mood that you get at the memorial at the State Capitol is that someone threw a bunch of mud at the wall and said this is where we will put memorials for everything. He noted there is no theme or dignity. It's a memorial for veterans, laborers and civil rights leaders all thrown in a common area. He stressed that it would be a shame if they were to let anything take them away from what they are about. Mr. Benson indicated that it needs to be sustainable. Mr. Kost stated that with the Korean Memorial they worked on they tried to stay away from lighting in the ground. He noted they have one light fixture and they put it up in the sculpture because what they noticed at other memorials was as soon as people put lights into the ground it's good for a couple of years and then it starts to leak, water gets in and it breaks. He commented there is nothing worse than when you go to one of these memorials and it looks like it hasn't been cared for which doesn't send a good message. Mr. Kost explained to the committee that in the case of the Korean Memorial they created a plaza and out of different kinds of granite they told the story of the war and then off to the side is a lawn area where they hold larger events and that is where the flag poles are. Mr. Benson commented that he has been over there several times during the summer and it's interesting how many people from the government offices will come down and just sit there during a break or whatever and it seemed like a nice place just to be. Mr. Kost explained that they tried to create an outdoor room so that when you are sitting there it is quiet and a nice place to get away. Mr. Goergen indicated that one thing at Eden Prairie's memorial that impressed him is there is seating available that is part of the park and when he has been there he noticed people just sitting there quietly or reading, not necessarily looking at the memorial, but were there. He commented that others were wondering through and it was a place for reflection; it didn't necessarily have to be for the memorial, but was a public place that had some privacy in it. Mr. Kost stated it's a story that you don't force on people but it's there for them to experience and that maybe the 5`h time they come there and eat their lunch they start reading the information and learn about the situation of those who have served. it Mr. Kost asked the committee what are the different things they would like to see the memorial accomplish. He noted that one thing he has heard is that it has to have a.place to contemplate. Mr. Cardarelle pointed out that he thinks what they, have to, work with is the creek and four acres, which isn't a lot, but he,thinks it is sufficient. He noted that he thinks the well groomed area of trees especially gives them the feeling of the 150 years of Edina's participation in wars as well as for. at least the next 100 years. He thinks permanenceand upkeep are very important. Mr. Goergen indicated that he would like to see an area for contemplation but would also like. to have something by,50t' Stree(so that people who drive by on a daily basis will know that it's there or maybe see part of it that will result in them visiting it so he doesn't want to'see it really hidden away: He would like it t6be both public and private, find some kind of balance.. Mr. Goergen,: stated that he would also like to see the memorial as the head, basically the podium. for public ceremonies on Veteran's Day, Memorial Day, etc. He noted that the head speaker or whoever would be on the hard surface and the audience, so to speak, would be on the grounds and bring their own chairs or they could possibly rent chairs for an event. Mr. Kost stated that the idea that there is some flexibility -is a good one because the big events only happen once or twice a year so they don't really need a big paved area. Mr. Reed stated that he thinks there should be a "thanks" for those who served and include all branches but do -not list-specific conflicts. He noted that it needs to be for the past, present and future., He stressed that he does not like figures because he thinks it dates the memorial. Mr. Reed commented that he has also noticed that the predominant basic structure of a lot of memorials has been circles and he is getting bored of circles. He suggested the possibility of a pentagon because it could represent the five services. Mr. Schwartz indicated that whatever their memorial is he would hope that it fits Edina's personality and Ihe community. Something that looks like it has always been there and will always continue to be a part of the community. He noted that there are some beautiful old trees in the park but they are not going to be there in 100 years so he would hope they could plant some new trees. He stated that another, symbolism they could think about using is a star. He commented there is 'a patriotic dignity in symbolism that goes with a; star symbol as opposed to a wreath or something like that. Mr. Kost'added thatthe're�are also five points'on a star. Mr. Goergen suggested that when they are identifying by names those who have been killed perhaps beside their name they could add a star. Mr. Schwartz noted that the flag also has stars so it all.kind of goes together. Mr. Schwartz pointed out that for a raised platform: they can't have it with three or four steps because someone may have a disability and not be able to get up there if they were a speaker. However, he thinks it needs to be higher than the general surrounding, as if reaching up. Mr. Schwartz noted that another nice thing to have would be wooden benches or swings because it's hard to sit very long on a stone bench. He suggested that possibly this could be an Eagle Scout project to go throughout the park and build benches. Mr. Kost 3 1 replied that with swings they can have mechanical /maintenance problems and that the wood isn't going to last forever. He suggested they could maybe set up some type of fund for the memorial itself. He noted that if their fundraising goal was $400,000 maybe they could raise it to $450,000 and that $50,000 would be put away for things like benches or maybe the sculpture needs to have its patina updated or cracks filled. He commented that this way they may not have to worry as much if the budget were all of a sudden cut. Mr. Schwartz noted that the last thing they have to have is flags because there is a dignity that goes with that; however, they need to have lights on it because they can't have someone raise and lower the flag every day; besides, they want people to see it at night. Mr. Benson stated that in going back Mr. Schwartz had made the suggestion to have some appropriate quotes that are kind of ubiquitous in terms of military or patriotism that would stand out and help tie the symbolism to the meaning of what they are doing in terms of veterans. Mr. Goergen indicated that he agrees we want some significant quotes but yet they don't want to overdo it. He noted that he thinks it's the committee's consensus that the memorial at Eden Prairie was overdone. He noted that at the Eden Prairie memorial they recognized significant donors with company logos and that is something they do not want to do. They would like for the permanent recognition to be very minimal. Mr. Kost stated more subtle to which Mr. Goergen replied yes, more subtle and dignified, yet done very professionally. Mr. Reed stated that he thinks a consideration should be given to Minnesota Natural Products such as stone and hard surfaces but also the plantings should be hearty and easily maintained and something that represents what you see in Minnesota. He pointed out that another shape that could be considered representing Edina is the shamrock or clover and it could be done boldly or it could be subtle. Mr. Reed stated that he has a problem with the POW flag. He explained that it was the National League of Families flag that actually in its day was formed by the wives of POWs. He indicated that it's become a symbol but to his knowledge they do not have any POWs in the United States. He stated that he thinks it was good in Vietnam and after but he doesn't always think that should be an integral part. He noted that he thinks they need to check on the true meaning of it. Mr. Kost stated that it was his understanding that the committee wants three flags; the American flag, the POW flag and that the third flag could be interchanged between the Edina flag and the State flag. Mr. Benson replied that it's an interesting point but since Vietnam and the establishment of the POW flag it's been a symbol of remembrance of the military service and it represents that aspect. Mr. Goergen stated that he likes it and thinks it should be part of it because it's a meaningful element in a memorial. Mr. Schwartz pointed out that he has agreed with everything Mr. Reed has said since this committee started; however, this is one case he doesn't fully agree with. He noted there are at least two people from Edina who died in WWII as prisoners of war. Also he would hate to have their ceremony and then see in the paper the next day that Edina now has a memorial but incidentally they didn't put the POW flag out and then it becomes an issue and controversy instead of the value of what they are actually doing it for. Mr. Kieffer pointed out that the other thing is if they are looking to the past, present and future 4 N there are going to be POWs in the future as well as MIAs, killed in action. He commented that no one really knows for sure that there currently are no POWs. Mr. Kost stated that what he is hearing is that the majority of the committee wants the POW flag. Mr. Kost suggested to the committee that when they are doing press releases on the project and fundraising that what they might want to get out there is the notion of what is a POW and MIA and where did that flag come from and include those people from Edina who didn't come home because it's a very compelling story that needs to be told. He commented that he thinks the Edina flag makes more sense to him as opposed to the state flag because it's Edina's memorial; however, they don't need to make that decision now. Mr. Goergen stated that they would like to have mechanical/automatic flags that do not necessitate a human being to bring them up and down. He noted that at some memorials, he has seen where the flags are offset of the memorial, either behind or at the entrance. He commented that he has seen where flags are built almost into the memorial. He added that the committee has not discussed a preference. Mr. Kieffer responded that they could do it one of two ways: they could use those flags along 50`h Street to draw attention to the memorial or put it in the memorial. He noted the question is do they want to draw people in and, if so, how are they going to draw them in, with lighted flags. Mr. Goergen noted that some firms gave them the idea of a walkway coming off of 50 'h Street or coming off the parking lot. Mr. Kost commented that the idea of the entrance and the draw is intriguing because there is a lot of traffic on 50`h Street. He noted that to see the flags and have them lit at night, especially once the dedication has taken place, everyone going down 50`h Street is going to potentially make the connection that is where the Edina Memorial is. Mr. Kieffer said when there is a ceremony with a podium and the flags are in the background, if the crowd is looking at the podium they would also be able to watch an official flag being raised. Mr. Goergen stated that if the flags are part of the entrance then they are taking it away from the memorial. Mr. Christiaansen replied that is where the balance comes in and added that the creek is also very important, other people are going out of their way to make water features and Edina already has one at this park. He stated that having the two points of entrance and a place of contemplation is where he would like to see some options on the presentation. Mr. Goergen noted that he thinks they have some pretty wide open variations on what they can do to the site, outside of the restrooms. He stated that he believes if they need to they could move the gazebo and/or the fire ring. Mr. Schwartz noted that they would have to talk to the boy scouts before moving the fire ring. Mr. Christiaansen commented that it would be good to know how close they can get to the creek for some of their ideas. He noted that they have talked about going right up the edge of the creek; however, that may not even be a possibility. 5 Mr. Kost, Ms. Anderson and the committee went over different locations and ideas on the map of Utley Park. Mr. Kieffer asked if anyone knows the history of any flooding issues at the creek especially because of the winter they've been having. Mr. Cardarelle responded that he doesn't think it's going to be a problem because the creek is controlled in a couple of places. Mr. Kost asked the committee if the green space is getting used a lot by people throwing Frisbees, active recreation kind of things, etc. It was noted no because there are too many trees in the way. Mr. Reed pointed out that the church across the street has an event once a year called Johnny Appleseed where they take over the whole park and have a carnival. Mr. Reed pointed out that he thinks it was either Mr. Keprios or Mr. Kojetin who said that the City has an agreement with the church where the church does maintenance on the parking lot because the City lets them use the parking lots on Sundays. He commented that if they want to look at expanding parking maybe the church would give them some money to do it. Mr. Kost stated that another thing he has heard from the committee is that parking is going to be important especially as folks get older and are less ambulatory so they may want to look at getting parking closer to the memorial. Mr. Goergen pointed out that another thing they are kind of limited on is that the City wants minimal tree disruption and they are pretty adamant about it. Mr. Kost commented that he would think the committee would want to keep in mind that they would rather invest money in the memorial than in rebuilding the park. Mr. Kieffer noted that somehow they need to get it to flow all the way to the creek. Mr. Reed indicated that he thought he heard that in the future they hope to maybe enhance the restrooms. Mr. Goergen noted that he would like to at least see an upgrade of landscaping to hide the restrooms so that it's not a focal point when people are walking towards the memorial. Mr. Goergen indicated that during the interview process one of the firms showed them their preliminary which was like a circle around the restrooms that would be used as a drop off point. Mr. Reed commented that they also showed parking oriented towards 50`h Street which would give them about 16 more spaces. Mr. Cardarelle noted that he would like to see the flags up on 50th Street so that it draws people in and with the half dozen parking spaces in that indention for people coming to look at it he thinks is ideal. Mr. Schwartz stated that there is no rule that says you can't have two flags in a park. He noted that he always goes to the Fourth of July parade and the carnival on 50`h Street and that they always find a place to park, they've never had a problem. 9 Mr. Kost commented that he thinks what he. is hearing now is possibly having four flags, and three of those would be in a grouping. He noted that depending how they focus the flags in the location they are talking about and if.they are illuminated people will be able to see them from the entrances. Mr..Goergen noted that the memorial is there for the public but feels it's a fine line between the public awareness that's there and the private reflection area that they are talking about. He noted that his thought is that it can be too close to the street especially if there are three flags at the entry point. He stated that it will make the public aware that this is where the memorial is because of the three flags. Mr. Kost stated that maybe what can happen is that it ends up.to be more of a circulation kind' of a situation where everything is kind.of woven' together so that.in essence it becomes part of the park but it'.s also the memorial. Mr. Goergen responded that his thought is if the memorial is just there as people go through the park he is fearful it's going to become another, Centennial Lakes Where it's a long walkway and the memorial would become a minor element of it. He added. that he's afraid it could become a throughway from point N to .point B and people say "Oh there's a;memorial ". He noted that he would like for the memorial to be the destination point. Mr. Kost stated that the memorial is the destination and what he is asking is do they want the contemplation area to interact with the creek because if they do there will need to be some kind a connection or offshoot from the actual destination. Mr. Schwartz pointed out that they are focusing on two hours a year, the Memorial Day ceremony and the Fourth.of July. He noted that the memorial is going to be there for 365 days a year and therefore feels the Fourth of July and Memorial Day ceremonies should accommodate to what the memorial is. He stated that the memorial is something that will be there all 'of the time for people to always see and visit. He asked. are they building a site that's going to be.used fora ceremony or are they building a site that's a veteran's memorial. Mr. Goergen asked Mr. Schwartz if he is saying .hewould like more of a reflection area for the other 363 days to which Mr. Schwartz replied more dignity for 365 days a year and he can bring his own chair or blanket to the site for ceremonies. Mr. Kost stated that again it goes back to that flexibility issue if you have circulation through the park, the memorial can be a place that you go to and then from the memorial you go to other places such as the contemplation area or down by the creek. He stated he would like to find a way to get to the creek so that it feels like it is more part of the memorial. Mr. Kieffer,indicated that back to the symbolism they almost have five different shoots so they.could do a star. There is a pathway, parking and two shoots towards the creek. Whether they do a pentagon style or a star they could internalize the symbol in the middle and then have shoots off that. Mr. Reed commented there are two things he would like to bring up. First, he thinks they need to be careful of having vertical structures next to the street because you won't be able to see it as you drive by because you're limited. Secondly, he noted that this park is a destination park for the tennis court and the basketball court as well as there is a canoe 7 landing that Mr. Keprios did mention they may need to relocate. Mr. Reed stated so there are people going there; however, basically from the restroom building to Wooddale is not really what he would call a destination park and added that there are no jogging or walking trails and so it doesn't connect to anything and therefore people would have to make a conscious effort to go there. Mr. Schwartz suggested that they will have a beautiful memorial there and it will become a destination and that even people who are canoeing will stop to go there. Mr. Goergen indicated that he thinks the committee's list and Mr. Kost's list are pretty much in agreement. He noted that one thing they haven't talked about the individual elements, such as what they are envisioning for tablets and emblems. Mr. Kost stated that what he wanted to capture was that they are all on the same page with the elements. He noted that is sounds like he hasn't heard anyone bring anything new to the table. Mr. Kost pointed out that one thing he would ask the committee to think about between now and their next meeting is the idea of a sculpture or figure. He commented that he has heard some people say they are good with it not being a soldier and asked if the whole group is okay with that. Mr. Goergen replied that is something they have not yet formally done and that needs to be done next month. He noted that they also have to get some ideas from the committee on fundraising. He stated that he sees them formalizing it next month but, thinks they are leaning against having a human figure. Mr. Kost indicated that he also thinks the star and pentagon symbols are interesting design ideas and asked the committee to also think about that in relation to what the sculpture or symbolic element could be. Mr. Goergen stated that hopefully at next month's meeting they will be able to settle on some type of sculpture or figure and then they need to start searching for an artist as well as try and kick start their fundraising. Meeting Adjourned at 9:20 am Air fA 0 4co x I CO r�� 0 The Hennepin County Sheriff's Office offers condolences to the family and friends of the law enforcement officers who have died in the line of duty. - o Oon ft mm Photo on the cover courtesy Star Tribune The Hennepin County Sheriff's Office was honored to pay tribute to Sergeant Joseph Bergeron of the Maplewood Police Department during his funeral service. Sergeant Bergeron was killed in the line of duty on May 1, 2010. Mahnomen County Sheriff's Deputy Chris Dewey died on August 9, 2010. Eighteen months earlier, he had been shot in the line of duty. The Hennepin County Sheriff's Office was honored to assist with the funeral services for Deputy Dewey. With 780 employees and 200 volunteers, the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office provides law enforcement services to the largest county by population in Minnesota. Hennepin County is located in the 16th most populated metro area in the U.S. In 2010, the Sheriff's Office remained committed to reducing crime across the county, managing resources effectively, and planning for future public safety needs and challenges. Since 2006, the rate of violent crime in Hennepin County has dropped approximately 32 percent. Among the areas of accomplishment for the Sheriff's Office in 2010: Illegal drugs confiscated/ medicines collected: Our Narcotics Unit and other units, with area task forces, confiscated $27.4 million worth of illegal drugs and dismantled several drug operations. We completed the county's first Unwanted Medicine Collection Event. More than 700 citizens dropped off medications — reducing the supply of prescriptions that could be diverted for abuse or illegal sales. Violent crime, illegal guns and gangs targeted: There were 6,144 felony warrants served. Our Suburban Juvenile Initiative arrested 236 juvenile offenders. The Sheriff's Office confiscated a record number of guns. DNA program expanded: Using federal stimulus funds, we added resources to the Sheriff's Crime Lab, which collects and analyzes evidence for law enforcement agencies countywide. The backlog of biology cases, which includes DNA cases, has been reduced by 70 percent. Jail costs reduced: Inmates are now making certain court appearances via interactive video conferencing. More medical services are offered inside the jail. Both innovative programs reduce the cost of transporting inmates to other facilities. HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE • 2010 ANNUAL REPORT • 1 Criminal information sharing continued: The Sheriff's Criminal Information Sharing and Analysis Unit (CISA) provides resources and analysis to law enforcement agencies throughout the county to prevent crime, identify crime trends, and locate violent criminals. CISA has been recognized by national organizations for establishing best practices in effective information sharing that result in the reduction of crime. Secured approval for a new 911 Communications Facility: The current 911 facility is 60+ years old and it must be replaced in order to ensure continued 911 services. Planning has begun to build a new 911 Communications Facility. I am proud of everyone in this agency who has worked hard to identify and implement efficiencies and maximize resources while continuing to advance public safety. We've had two successive years of budget cuts. Just like families, businesses and other units of government, the Sheriff's Office has had to manage through the difficult economic times of the past few years. The 2010 annual report describes the services and outstanding achievements of the Sheriff's Office. The men and women of the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office continue to fulfill the mission we embrace each and every day: increasing public safety through leadership, integrity and strong partnership. Adult Detention Division The Hennepin County Adult Detention Center is the largest jail in Minnesota. The Hennepin County Sheriff's Office Adult Detenion Division operates the jail. The Sheriff's Office and law enforcement agencies throughout Hennepin County book arrestees into the jail. In 2010, there were 35,413 bookings into the facility. The Adult Detention Division is com- manded by Captains Darrell Huggett and Mike Wresh. Jail facilities are located in two different buildings in downtown Minneapolis but are treated as one jail facility: 1) The Public Safety Facility (PSF) has 330 beds for inmates. 2) The Minneapolis Municipal Building (also known as City Hall) has 509 beds for inmates on the fourth and fifth floors. Since 1985, the jail has maintained the distinction of being fully accredited by the American Correctional Association for maintaining the highest standards of inmate custody and care. Inmate Medical Care Jails and correctional facilities nation- wide are required to provide medical care to inmates when care is medically necessary. In 2010, the Sheriff's Office continued to develop innovative new programs to provide required care in a cost - effective manner. When medical ser- vices are provided inside of the jail, there are significant savings. In -house care avoids the cost of transporting the inmate to a hospital or care facility. In addition, in -house care avoids the personnel cost of providing security for inmates while they are being treated at hospitals. Here are examples of new and ongoing programs to reduce inmate medical costs: Jail Infirmary The Hennepin County Jail has a four -bed jail infirmary which allows for high levels of medical care to be provided in- house. In 2010, there were 1,285 jail infirmary bed days. If each of these days had been hospital bed days, there would have been significant labor costs associated with guarding the inmates. Providing treat- ment in a jail infirmary saved the Sher- iff's Office more than $1 million in 2010 for security costs alone. X -ray Services In 2010, the jail began utilizing the ser- vices of an independent X -ray company which comes to the jail with X -ray equip- ment and medical care providers. Prior to this new service, inmates were taken to medical care facilities for X -rays. During just three months, 77 X -rays have been taken in the jail infirmary which has saved more than $8,000 in transport and security costs. Jail Volunteer Program By organizing a comprehensive volunteer program, the jail provides mentoring and counseling opportunities for inmates. More than 100 citizen volunteers pro- vide optional instruction on topics that include Alcoholics Anonymous, domes- tic violence prevention, and religious instruction. If you'd like to volunteer, please contact Sgt. Heather Stephens at 612 -596 -8089 or heather.stephens@ co.hennepin.mn.us. Court Services Division The Hennepin County Sheriff's Office Court Services Division includes the Court Security Unit and the Civil Unit. The division is commanded by Captain Michele Smolley. Court Security Unit The primary function of the Court Secu- rity Unit is to provide law enforcement services to the Fourth Judicial District Court. In 2010, the Court Security Unit escorted 33,388 inmates to court and escorted 1,707 patients to Mental Health Court. In 2010, the unit collaborated with Sher- iff's Office jail staff and District Court to complete the first ITV hearing. ITV al- lows defendants to make appearances via interactive video conferencing for certain Family Court hearings. This program reduces staff and transport costs because inmates appear in court via ITV instead of being transported out of the jail and to another court facility. Also in 2010, personnel from the Deten- tion /Court Services Bureau provided law enforcement services during the ballot recount after the November elec- HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE • 2010 ANNUAL REPORT • 3 tion. The Hennepin County recount of the ballots in the Minnesota governor's race took place in the Hennepin County Government Center. Deputies guarded the ballot room which contained election materials and ballots 24 hours a day and seven days a week until the recount was complete. The Court Security Unit is in partner- ship with the Federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF) Explosive Detection Canine Program. There are two Hennepin County Sheriff's Office/ ATF K -9 teams assigned to the unit. These teams have successfully completed assignments within the court facilities and provide services to law enforcement agencies throughout the Upper Midwest. The K9 teams assist with security details throughout the country for the ATF, the FBI and the United States Secret Service. Inspector Curt Roberts leads the Detention /Court Services Bureau, which includes the Adult Detention Division and Court Services Division. 1. (Opposite) VJ Smith (standing) from MAD DADS of Minneapolis and John Turnipseed of Urban Ventures volunteer their time at the jail to provide instruction to inmates concerning positive life skills. More than 100 volunteers provide counseling or instruction to inmates each year. Sheriff's office provides jail training nationwide The Sheriff's Office is recognized as a national leader for developing effective methods for the care and custody of inmates with mental health issues. In 2010, our deputies provided training to other correctional facilities nationwide via a live webcast. 7 Civil Unit A significant responsibility of the Sheriff's Office is the service of civil process. The Civil Unit deploys deputies throughout Hennepin County to handle 31 types of civil process such as subpoenas, sum- monses, and domestic abuse orders for protection. In 2010, the Civil Unit received 26,117 processes for service. Persons were lo- cated and served in 18,618 cases. There were 42,906 total public contacts for civil process. In addition to civil matters, deputies arrested 26 individuals on war- rants and issued 144 uniform citations. Compared to 2009, there was a small in- crease in the number of foreclosure sales in 2010 with a total of 5,973. In 2009, there was an average of 472 foreclosure sales per month, while in 2010, there were approximately 497 sales per month. Although there has been fluctuation in foreclosure sales, numbers of evictions have remained fairly consistent over the past several years. From 2009 to 2010, there was a slight decrease in evictions. In 2010, there were 994 evictions com- pared to 1,026 in 2009. The Civil and Finance units of the Sher- iff's Office contributed to the implemen- tation of Hennepin County's Foreclosure Prevention and Response Program. It assists homeowners who are concerned about foreclosure. Among the many components of the program, homeowners or renters may attend a series of free mortgage foreclo- sure information workshops offered by the Minnesota Home Ownership Center in collaboration with Hennepin County Taxpayer Services and Hennepin County Library. For more information, visit the Hennepin County website, www.hennepin.us, or call the Minnesota Home Ownership Center at 651- 659 -9336. Community Advisory Board provides valuable input The ,ommunity Advisory Board is a group of approximately 20 people - community leaders and everyday citizens. They meet to provide valuable input for Sheriff's Office strategic planning. The Community Advisory Board is an effective way for the Sheriff's Office to receive direction directly from the people of Hennepin County. HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE - 2010 ANNUAL REPORT • S Learn more about the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office Open House School groups especially enjoy the Sher- iff's Office Open House which takes place at Patrol Unit headquarters in Brooklyn Park (1). Citizen Law Enforcement Academy Citizens may enroll in an 11 -week, hands -on academy. It includes a tour of the Crime Lab and jail (3). National Night Out Crime Prevention Education Neighborhoods organize gatherings for National Night Out. The Sheriff and dep uties visit these local events to provide crime prevention information (2). Sheriff's Office personnel participate in community events and provide crime prevention education (4). For more information about these events, call the Public Information Officer at 612- 348 -3744 or email us at sheriff &o.hennepin.mn.us. Enforcement Services Division Captain Dave Zimmer leads the division which includes the Patrol Unit, Transport Unit, Warrant Unit, Water Patrol Unit, and Special Operations Unit. Patrol Unit The mission of the Patrol Unit is to keep and preserve the peace of the county; respond to emergencies and calls for assistance; investigate incidents and criminal acts; and promote community policing, crime prevention and public safety education. In addition, the Patrol Unit provides specialized services to communities and law enforcement agencies throughout the county including police K -9 services, D.A.R.E. education, dignitary protection, and a Special Enforcement Response Team (SERT). SERT's primary mission is to direct patrols in areas identified as hot spots for crime. SERT and the Patrol Unit work in partnership with local law enforcement agencies to patrol areas of higher criminal activity throughout the county. SERT and the Patrol Unit made arrests in connection with a variety of crimes -- from bank robbery to aggravated assault. As a result of these focused and augmented patrols, there have been improved response times and the deterrence of criminal activity in the affected areas. Each year, the Patrol Unit participates in several Safe & Sober enforcement efforts aimed toward taking impaired drivers off the road. The Minnesota Depart- ment of Public Safety coordinates these details which involve agencies statewide. In addition, the Patrol Unit collaborates with District Court by conducting home compliance visits to defendants who are under the jurisdiction of the DWI Court. In 2010, Patrol Unit personnel conducted 1,434 home visits. The Patrol Unit is the primary law en- forcement service provider to six com- munities and two county facilities: Fort Snelling, Greenfield, Hanover (Hennepin County), Hassan Township, Medicine Lake, Rockford (Hennepin County), the Hennepin County Home School, and the Hennepin County Adult Corrections Facility. Warrant Unit The Warrant Unit is responsible for the administration and execution of the service of arrest warrants, commitments and other court orders issued for persons who are wanted in Hennepin County and /or other jurisdictions. The unit is also responsible for extraditing wanted individuals who are captured elsewhere back to Hennepin County. The primary focus of the Warrant Unit is tracking down the county's most violent offenders. In 2010, there were 6,144 felony warrants served. The organization of special warrant "sweeps" throughout the year is an ef- ficient way for the Warrant Unit to locate and arrest people who are wanted on ac- tive warrants. In 2010, the Warrant Unit organized two major sweeps. "Opera- tion Summer Splash" took place in July 2010 and "Winter Wipeout" took place in December 2010. In both sweeps, the' Sheriff's Office partnered with law en- forcement agencies throughout Hennepin County in the effort to locate and arrest adults and juveniles who are wanted on active warrants. Numerous arrests were made on active warrants related to a variety of offenses — from felonies to misdemeanors.'The sweeps also focused on locating convict- ed sex offenders who are non - compliant with state registration requirements. The conclusion of the warrant sweeps does not end the pursuit for people with active warrants. Every day, the Sher- iff's Office Warrant Unit and local law enforcement agencies pursue and arrest wanted individuals. In 2010, the Warrant Unit continued several important initiatives, including a partnership with the FBI's Minnesota Violent Crime Fugitive Task Force. It targets violent fugitives who have either fled our state, or who have fled another J urisdiction and have moved into our community. HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE • 2010 ANNUAL REPORT • 7 The Warrant Unit operates the Hen- nepin County Sheriff's Office Suburban Juvenile Initiative (SJI) which focuses on juveniles with arrest warrants. The goal is to provide consequences and account- ability to the juveniles. In 2010, depu- ties checked 367 addresses, sought 276 juvenile offenders and arrested 236. An additional 30 juveniles avoided arrest by reporting to the Hennepin County Ju- venile Justice Center after being actively sought by SJI. The Warrant Unit participates in the Hennepin County Parolee Accountability Collaborative Enforcement (HC -PACE) group. The law enforcement team — in- cluding Warrant Unit deputies — makes visits to parolees who are on Intensive Supervised Release (ISR) at the direction of the Minnesota Department of Correc- tions. HC -PACE ensures parolees comply with terms of their probation. Enforce- ment action is taken if violations are found. In 2010, the team conducted 178 home visits and arrested 31 people. Transport Unit The Transport Unit transports people under the jurisdiction of the county and state, including inmates bound for hearings in outer division courthouses, convicted inmates bound for correctional facilities, and mental health patients bound for court hearings or being trans- ferred from various treatment facilities. The Transport Unit logged 348,480 miles and safely transported 12,501 inmates and mental health patients pursuant to court orders. The unit apprehended 47 mental health patients and served 1,495 summonses. It also completed 256 transports for local police departments and provided transport services to deten- tion and detoxification centers. The unit completed 988 writ transports, which are court - ordered appearances from prison- ers held at Department of Correction facilities throughout the state. Inspector Jeff Storms leads the Enforcement Services Bureau. It consists of the Enforcement Services, Communications, and Information Technology divisions. 1. (Opposite) The Patrol Unit works with local and state law enforcement partners in an effort to remove impaired drivers from roadways across Hennepin County. Each year in Minnesota, alcohol - related crashes account for more than 140 deaths and 30,000 -plus motorists are arrested for DWI. 2. (Opposite) In 2010, the U.S. Police Canine Association Region 12, presented an award to Deputy Thomas Sigfrinius and his partner, Ikar, for their efforts in the apprehension of an armed robbery suspect in Carver County. The Sheriff's Office has nine K -9 teams. In 2010, they received more than 800 calls for service throughout the Upper Midwest. Sheriff's Office Water Patrol The Sheriff's Office Water Patrol Unit actively patrols the county's 104 lakes and three major rivers. Enforcement and emergency response on the county's water- ways occurs throughout the year. During the winter months, the unit uses snowmobiles to patrol frozen lakes and rivers. Deputies are skilled at rescuing victims who have fallen through the ice. The unit is trained to provide swift water rescue and airborne rescue. For the second year in a row, there have been no water related or boating fatalities on Lake Minnetonka, one of the busiest lakes in the Upper Midwest. On Lake Minnetonka, free lifejackets are available for children to borrow for the day. The lifejackets are available at several public boat launches. On lakes and rivers throughout the county, enforcement and education efforts continue to be a key factor in reducing the risk of drownings and accidents. The Sheriff's Water Patrol receives hundreds of hours of specialized train- ing year- round. Water Patrol provides training opportunities for citizens and other law enforcement agencies as well, including: Minnesota State Patrol Airwing train- ing sessions with Water Patrol: The unit participates in this joint training with a helicopter so that personnel are proficient using effective procedures and advanced equipment. Hennepin County Sheriff's Office Un- derwater Recovery Team (URT): Water Patrol and the URT train with a side - scan sonar unit, technology that greatly reduces the time needed to locate drowning victims. The URT is a dive team that recovers drowning victims and searches for evidence underwater. Search and Rescue Operations and Sheriff's Office Resources class: The class described how Sheriff's Office re- sources can assist in emergencies. Hen- nepin County chiefs of police or their representative attended. Topics included K -9 search and apprehension, dive op- erations, and criminal investigation. • Outreach to Youth: Water Patrol and the Minnesota DNR provided instruc- tion to youth on snowmobile and ATV safety and operation. Hooked on Fishing! Kids from the Boys & Girls Club of the Twin Cities go fishing with deputies during Hooked on Fishing. Each year, the event on Lake Minnetonka gives kids a chance to spend time with positive role models and gives them a chance to reel in a big catch. The Hennepin County Sfieriff Foundation is a nonprofit organization that organizes the event to help at -risk youth in our community. HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE • 2010 ANNUAL REPORT • 13 New 911 Communications Facility planned When you call 911, you need an immedi- ate answer — whether it's a heart attack, a child choking, a house fire, a shooting, vehicle crash, or any type of emergency. In each situation, every minute counts. The Sheriff's Office is committed to pro- viding the highest level of professional 911 services to residents and first responders. That is why we are moving forward with plans for construction of a new 911 Com- munications Facility. The current facility in Golden Valley is more than 60 years old and a new facility is needed to ensure con- tinued 911 services and to accommodate future advancements in communications technology. In 2010, the Hennepin County Board vot- ed to begin the schematic design process to construct a new facility in Plymouth, Minnesota. The project is scheduled to begin construction in 2012. 1. The new Sheriff's Office 911 Communications Facility will be constructed on county -owned land in Plymouth where a communications tower is already located. The facility will be adjacent to the Adult Correctional Facility at Parkers Lake, near County Road 6. 2. Radio technicians monitoring 800 -MHz radio infrastructure. 3. A radio technician verifying the alibration of a portable radio. The Sheriff's Office manages and maintains portable radios for first responders across the county. 4. A 911 dispatcher enters caller information into a computer aided dispatch system. Forensic Sciences Division The Hennepin County Sheriff's Office Forensic Sciences Division provides fo- rensic services to 32 suburban Hennepin County law enforcement agencies and several state and federal agencies. Captain Brian Kasbohm leads the division. Crime Scene Unit Crime scene technicians work in this unit and collect evidence at crime scenes, disaster scenes, and other incidents throughout Hennepin County. Crime scene technicians are licensed sheriff's deputies and they work in the only unit of its kind in Hennepin County that is available to respond to crime scenes 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Crime Laboratory Unit The Crime Laboratory Unit includes the Administration and Support, Biology, Evidence Management, Firearm and Tool Mark, Latent Print, and Multimedia Evi- dence sections. The Sheriff's Office Crime Lab is one of only three accredited crime laboratories in Minnesota. It has also earned Inter- national Program Accreditation from the American Society of Crime Labora- tory Directors /Laboratory Accredita- tion Board. The accreditation program demonstrates that lab management, personnel, operational and technical pro- cedures, equipment and physical facilities meet exceptional standards. In 2010, the Crime Lab reduced the backlog of biology cases by 70 percent. (Biology cases include DNA analysis.) Examination report turnaround times were reduced by an average of 55 percent during the same period. These accomplishments were made possible due to an increase in staff and improved work areas. The Sheriff's Office was awarded a $1.13 - million American Recovery and Reinvestment Act grant. The stimulus funding allowed the lab to hire seven more employees and to create a new program, the DNA Property Crime Initiative. This has improved service to suburban police departments that are requesting DNA analysis in property crime cases — such as burglary, theft and damage to property. People who commit property crimes typically commit more than one — and they often move on to committing more violent crime. Solving property crimes reduces violent crime and improves qual- ity of life in neighborhoods. HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE • 2010 ANNUAL REPORT • 9 Unwanted Medicine Collection Event The Hennepin County Sheriff's Office would like to thank citizens for partici- pating in the county's first unwanted - medicine collection event that took place in St. Louis Park on September 25, 2010. The Sheriff's Office provided law enforce- ment services during the collection and organized the event in partnership with Hennepin County. Medications in the home have become a problem for a number of reasons: • Unwanted, unused medications stored at home pose safety and health threats and can lead to poisoning or abuse. • Prescription drug abuse is the fastest growing type of drug abuse in the U.S. • Among young people, seven of the top 10 abused substances are pharmaceuti- cals and many of them are taken from the medicine cabinets of family and friends. At the first collection event, citizens dropped off their unwanted prescription and over - the - counter medications for safe and secure disposal. Tens of thousands of pills were collected. All items were taken to hazardous waste incinerators for destruction. Sponsors of the event included the Hen- nepin County Environmental Services and Human Services and Public Health departments, the City of St. Louis Park, and U.S. Drug Enforcement Administra- tion. In 2011, several additional unwanted - medicine events are scheduled. For updates on dates and locations, visit www.hennepinsheriff.org. Special Operations Unit The Special Operations Unit provides operational support to the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office (HCSO) as well as local, state and federal law enforce- ment partners by coordinating planning, logistics and operations for special events and initiatives involving Sheriff's Of- fice resources. The unit oversees the five teams and units listed below. HCSO Emergency Management Team The HCSO Emergency Management Team provides the Sheriff's Office as well as local law enforcement agencies with personnel and equipment to sup- port emergency management functions at events such as natural disasters, law enforcement incidents, and community celebrations. Hennepin County Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) Tactical Response Team The Sheriff's Office is the lead agency of the Hennepin County Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) Tactical Response Team. This team is composed of members from the following law enforcement agen- cies: Airport Police Department, Brooklyn Center Police Department, Brooklyn Park Police Department, Eden Prairie Police Department, Golden Valley Police Depart- ment, Maple Grove Police Department, Metro Transit Police Department, Minne- apolis Park Police Department, Minnesota State Patrol, Plymouth Police Department and St. Anthony Police Department. The team is trained and equipped to provide specialized operational support for tactical operations in a hazardous materials or WMD environment. The team provides this support to the Sher- iff's Office as well as other local, state and federal law enforcement agencies. Emergency Services Unit The Emergency Services Unit (ESU) is a county and regional tactical resource. ESU responds to situations including hostage rescue, barricaded suspects, and high -risk warrant service. The team utilizes special training, tactics, weapons and equipment with the goal of achiev- ing peaceful resolutions to dangerous situations. In 2010, the ESU conducted 40 high -risk warrants for local, state and federal investigative agencies. HCSO Special Response Force The HCSO Special Response Force pro- vides the Sheriff's Office as well as local law- enforcement agencies with personnel and equipment to support law- enforce- ment operations at special events, dem- onstrations or community celebrations where there is a potential for civil unrest or criminal activity. Critical Infrastructure Protection Patrols The Special Operations Unit coordinated the use of Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) grant funding to initiate a Critical Infrastructure Protection patrol program within the Sheriff's Office. Under this program, deputies are assigned to provide high - visibility patrols of potential terrorist targets. The unit co- ordinated the provi- sion of hundreds of hours of grant- funded patrols in 2010. HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE • 2010 ANNUAL REPORT • 11 Information Technology Division The Information Technology Division provides extensive project management services, technology leadership, and con- sulting to the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office as well as other criminal justice agencies in Hennepin County and Minne- sota. Paul Przybilla serves as the Informa- tion Technology Division manager. The primary activities of the IT Divi- sion include the research, procurement, installation, and ongoing support of all computer workstations, servers, and specialized vendor systems within the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office. The division provides emergency support for Sheriff's Office applications year- round, 24 hours a day. The IT Division collaborates with law enforcement and criminal justice part- ners throughout the county to develop technology solutions that will assist them in preventing crime and investigating and solving cases. The IT Division advances public safety communications by com- pleting projects and providing support at the Sheriff's Office 911 dispatch center. 2010 IT Division projects included: Provided the Sheriff's Office Criminal Information Sharing Analysis (CISA) Unit with a dedicated Sheriff's IT staff per- son: This IT staff person performs data analysis, database management, and the 1. (Opposite) The Sheriff's Special Operations Unit conducted advanced training for WMD incidents. Personnel practiced tactics used for conducting a safe and effective response to chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosive (CBRNE) incidents. 2. In 2010, the Enforcement Services Division organized and conducted several complex mass - casualty drills with multiple law enforcement agencies throughout the county. The Sheriff's Office prepares, trains, and responds to emergencies, disasters and threats. loading and administration of tool sets. It has created processes and opportunities valuable to CISA analysts. Replaced Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) server and storage hardware: This project was critical to providing CAD application services to first responders throughout the county via Sheriff's 911 Communication. Created improvements to CAD perfor- mance and reporting: Older CAD events are now archived off of the system, which improves performance. This allows us- ers to query both current and archived events from a single query point while preserving critical CAD performance. Replacement of the Printrak Live Scan Latent Fingerprint capture workstations with Minnesota's Ll Identity Solu- tion Fingerprint capture stations: This involved rewriting the Livescan Message Manager (LMM) which submits data to a system that is the starting point of the justice process within Hennepin County. Fingerprint Livescan devices and LMM integration are critical to the arrest and booking process as well as the creation of data that is relied upon to navigate the various justice processes. Sign up now! Receive traffic, crime, and community alerts. Sign up to receive public safety information directly from the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office. You may receive our messages as texts, e -mail, or on the web. Go to www.nixle.com and select Hennepin County Sheriff's Office with Community Messages. Examples of information you may receive: an alert about an evacuation in your neighborhood, a description of a missing person, or crime prevention tips. The service is free. Communications Division The division is under the command of Captain Brian Tollin. Communications operates a 911 dispatch center and ad- ministrative offices. It is the largest con- solidated public safety answering point in the Upper Midwest. It operates 24 hours a day, seven days a week. The Commu- nications Division dispatches for 19 fire departments and 23 police agencies in 36 communities. It includes seven business lines: Training, Administration, and the units and teams listed below: Emergency 911 Dispatch Unit When you call 911 from many cities in Hennepin County, you will speak with the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office Emergency 911 Dispatch Unit. Sheriff's Office telecommunicators (also known as 911 dispatchers) identify the particular needs of the caller by gathering critical information and using this to de- termine an appropriate level of response by law enforcement, fire, or emergency medical responders. This process in- volves the telecommunicators using three computerized emergency telephone, dispatch, and radio systems. Telecommunicators provide ongoing up- dates to the officers in the field through a sophisticated computer -aided dispatch (CAD) system and 800 -MHz public safety radios. Radio Systems Management & Tactical Interoperable Communications Unit In 2010, this unit completed work on the county's portion of a field - deployable communications system to enhance the statewide Strategic Technology Reserve (STR). The STR provides supplemental voice and data communications capabili- ties to incidents involving either a loss or lack of communications infrastructure. The centerpiece of the STR is a self -con- tained deployable voice and data radio system installed on a trailer called a SAT - COW (Satellite Equipped Communica- tions Site on Wheels.) The STR includes a radio tower trailer and an electrical gen- erator trailer, with portable radios, laptop computers and other equipment. The STR also includes a mobile Incident Communications Center. The center is staffed by the Sheriff's Communications Response Team, consisting of Sheriff's Office engineering and technical staff from the Mobile Amateur Radio Corps. Radio Technical Support Unit The Radio Technical Support Unit helps make this communication possible by maintaining more than 6,900 portable and mobile radios on the 800 -MHz in- frastructure in which the Sheriff's Office provides dispatch services. Mobile radios and the 800 -MHz system are used daily and the system has been proven to be es- sential to saving lives during major mass casualty incidents. The unit's technicians create and program radio templates. They repair, diagnose and install public safety communica- tions in police, fire, emergency medical, and public works vehicles for agencies throughout the county. Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) Management Seventeen dispatch consoles are equipped with a computer -aided dispatch software system that incorporate mapping, public safety unit recommendations, location hazards and appropriate data tables along with mobile computer access to officers in the field. The CAD computers interface with the 911 emergency phone system to provide caller location information to dispatchers and first responders. Mobile Amateur Radio Corps/ Communications Response Team (MARC /CRT) The MARC /CRT operation is staffed with highly trained volunteers who have earned the title of "special deputy." MARC special deputies each hold an Amateur Radio Technician Class or higher license. They also serve on the Communications Response Team (CRT), a group within MARC. Violent Crime Initiative Division fhe Violent Crime Initiative Division includes the Hennepin County Violent Offender Task Force and the Criminal Information Sharing & Analysis Unit. Captains Chris Omodt and John Lageson lead the division. Hennepin County Violent Offender Task Force (HC VOTF) HC -VOTF conducts proactive, focused investigations on the county's most violent and dangerous offenders who are currently engaging in suspected illegal activity and have violent histories based on arrests or convictions for homicides, weapons, aggravated robberies and as- saults. The goal is to reduce violence in Hennepin County. HC -VOTF is comprised of Sheriff's inves- tigators and officers from a variety of law enforcement agencies including Brooklyn Park, Brooklyn Center, Golden Valley, Richfield and the Drug Enforcement Ad- ministration (DEA). HC -VOTF also works as a force multi- plier to assist law enforcement agencies throughout Hennepin County. If crime increases in a certain area, HC -VOTF may provide additional personnel to con- duct augmented patrols in partnership with local law enforcement. Criminal Information Sharing & Analysis Unit (CISA) CISAs mission is to provide timely and accurate analysis of criminal information to law enforcement agencies within Hen- nepin County. CISA provides a platform for agencies to share information about related crimes and provides crime pattern and trend analysis. CISA also provides investigative case support including link analysis, time lines, and telephone toll analysis. CISA's work in partnership with law enforcement agencies throughout the county has contributed to the successful identification of many suspects, crime patterns and trends. HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE • 2010 ANNUAL REPORT • 15 Examples of CISA analytical products: • Daily Information Bulletins: Provide in- depth information /research regarding current crimes. • Wanted Weekly Bulletins: Highlight 10 people with active arrest warrants in Hennepin County. In 2010, CISA provided services to the Northwest Collaboration and the South- west Collaboration. Both collaborations consist of meetings with representatives from area police departments to share information about criminal activity in various cities across the county. The Sheriff's Office and law enforcement agencies throughout Hennepin County collaborate in the Violent Crime Initia- tive, an organized bi- weekly meeting that allows law enforcement throughout Hen- nepin County and surrounding jurisdic- tions to cooperative more effectively. During initiative meetings, managers from several task forces describe active and potential cases, suspect informa- tion and reliable criminal information. Participants include HC VOTF, CISA, HCSO Narcotics, Northwest Metro Drug Task Force, Southwest Hennepin Drug Task Force, West Metro Drug Task Force, Anoka- Hennepin Narcotics and Violent Crimes Task Force, and the Twin Cities FBI Violent Gang Task Force. Prosecutors from the Hennepin County Attorney's Office and the U.S. Attorney's Office are key components in the initia- tive. They provide direction to assist area task forces in building strong cases and achieving successful prosecutions for their investigations. Inspector Kip Carver leads the Investigations Bureau which includes the Forensic Services, Violent Crime Initiative, and Investigative divisions. �o 1. (Opposite) The Crime Lab uses new, high -tech equipment that automates one process involved in DNA analysis. In 2010, a federal grant provided funding for the machine. 2. A CISA map provides information about a robbery spree, including crime locations, the suspects' direction of travel, and the most likely target area for future robberies. 3. CISA analyst Karl Kangas (center) was named Crime Analyst of the Year from the Tri County Investigators Association. One recent case involved an extensive criminal gang enterprise that included human trafficking, credit card fraud, theft and burglary. Investigative Division Captain John Lageson and Captain Chris Omodt serve as the commanders of the Investigative Division, which includes the Detective Unit and the Narcotics Unit. Detective Unit The Hennepin County Sheriff's Detective Unit conducts criminal investigations in the jurisdictions in which the Sheriff's Office is the primary law- enforcement services provider. Detectives also investi- gate crimes in Hennepin County commu- nities which have a police department but lack the resources to provide full -time investigators. In addition, the Detective Unit investigates incidents occurring at several county facilities and sites includ- ing the Public Safety Facility, Adult Cor- rections Facility and the County Home School. The Detective Unit assigns detectives to a variety of specialty assignments. One detective is assigned full -time to the Minnesota Joint Terrorism Task Force. Four detectives work full -time with the Hennepin County Attorney's Office, and one detective participates part -time with the Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force. One deputy is assigned to the Northwest Metro Drug Task Force. The Hennepin County Cold Case Team submits DNA evidence from unsolved cases for entry into a national DNA database of known offenders, seeking a match. The FBI manages the national database, the Combined DNA Index Sys- tem ( CODIS). In 2010, the team reviewed 9,600 cases, submitted 700 cases for forensic testing, and obtained 160 DNA hits to known offenders. Charges resulted in 15 cases and many of the suspects have a history of criminal sexual conduct and /or homicide. 2010 was the third year for the CODIS team, which consists of two detectives working on DNA matches of known of- fenders from evidence collected at crime scenes in Hennepin County. The team executed 37 search warrants and cleared 111 cases. Narcotics Unit The primary responsibility of the Nar- cotics Unit is to investigate controlled substance distribution within Hennepin County and to present these investigations to the appropriate prosecuting attorney's office for charging. The Narcotics Unit also collaborates with suburban police departments with proactive investigations. In 2010, the Narcotics Unit executed 313 search warrants, made 340 arrests and confiscated large amounts of drugs. Among the significant cases in 2010: The West Metro Drug Task Force (which includes a sergeant and a deputy from the Sheriff's Narcotics Unit) inves- tigated a marijuana distribution opera- tion. Officers confiscated 88 pounds of marijuana and made one arrest. The Southwest Hennepin Drug Task Force (which includes deputies from the Sheriff's Narcotics Unit) executed several search warrants related to a long -term heroin distribution case. There were four arrests with three de- fendants being charged in state court, and 1.25 pounds of heroin was confis- cated. This is a significant amount of heroin with a street value of more than $115,000. The Downtown Narcotics group con- ducted a cocaine distribution investiga- tion in Brooklyn Park. There were four arrests, and powder cocaine, crack co- caine and a handgun were confiscated. This case is a result of the Sheriff's Of- fice partnership with the Brooklyn Park Police Department through the North Hennepin Drug Collaborative. For citizens who are concerned that there may be evidence of illegal activity in their neighborhood, contact local law enforce- ment or the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office at 1- 888 - 988 -TIPS. Finance Division fhe Hennepin County Sheriff's Office Finance Division serves the entire agency, providing critical accounting support and financial reporting for the Sheriff's Office. The division is led by Finance Division Director Bryan Bennett. The Finance Division developed the Sheriff's Office annual budget of ap- proximately $85.4 million in 2010. The division develops the five -year capital improvement plan and provides fiscal analysis for the agency. The division works closely with the Sheriff's Office Civil Unit to assist with foreclosure sales, redemptions and executions, and civil service of process billing. HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE • 2010 ANNUAL REPORT • 17 Inspectors who oversee each bureau within the agency are provided with a va- riety of reports that show overtime usage by division, by supervisor and by user. Trend analysis and year -end projections are provided to command staff on a regu- lar basis in an effort to find efficiencies in scheduling and personnel. Through- out 2010 new financial analysis reports were developed for management use. The reports provide a basis to assess the financial impact of activities conducted within the Sheriff's Office. During 2010, Finance Division personnel readied the Sheriff's Office for a new fi- nancial system called APEX. This system required major changes to purchasing, Join our team as a special deputy employee expense reports, and financial transaction processing and reporting. Hennepin County went live with APEX on January 3, 2011. In 2011, the economic crisis is expected to continue to challenge all states, cit- ies, and counties — including Hennepin County. The Sheriff's Office is facing another budget reduction, and will be operating with $1.5 million (2.0 percent) less in budgeted property tax funding compared to 2010. A civilian may be sworn in as a "special deputy" after completing rigorous training. In 2010, special deputies volunteered more than 15,000 hours of their time by performing valuable public safety duties. They are essential to emergency preparedness. If the worst happens, special deputies are ready to be at their best to assist and serve. Would you like to volunteer? For more information, call 612 - 596 -9800 or email sheriff @co.hennepin.mn.us Special deputy units include: 1. Emergency Squad 2. Water Patrol 3. Mounted Patrol 4. Mobile Amateur Radio Corps Professional Standards Division The Professional Standards Division is led by Captain Rick Mulek and consists of the Employee Development, Personnel, Internal Affairs, and Community Services units. Employee Development Unit The Employee Development Unit man- ages training opportunities for Sheriff's Office employees which includes firearms training, leadership development, and new employee orientation. It also provides training opportunities for law enforcement agencies throughout Hennepin County. Here are examples of the unit's accom- plishments in 2010: • Partnered with the Minnesota Sheriffs' Association to assist in developing the cirriculum for the Standardized Correc- tional Training Program and provided instruction for several training sessions. • Purchased and installed a new firearm training simulator. • Assisted the Enforcement Services Division with two large -scale disaster training exercises involving multiple agencies. Personnel Unit The mission of the Personnel Unit is to recruit, select, manage and retain our most important resource: the employees of the Hennepin County Sheriff's Office. The unit also includes the Research and Development Section. The Research and Development Section maintains and updates policies and pro- cedures. It researches and develops in- novative and emerging trends in the law enforcement field. The section operated the 2010 Citizen Law Enforcement Acad- emies. These 11 -week programs educate citizens about the Sheriff's Office. Internal Affairs Unit The Internal Affairs Unit provides citizens with a fair and effective avenue to voice their legitimate concerns about the actions of the Sheriff's Office. It also protects employees from false allegations of misconduct and wrongdoing. It is the responsibility of the Internal Affairs Unit to ensure that the integrity of the Sheriff's Office is maintained. Community Services Unit The Community Services Unit provides community outreach and crime preven- tion education to citizens throughout Hennepin County. In 2010, the unit con- ducted special classes for diverse commu- nities to provide instruction about issues in public safety and education about the Sheriff's Office. Thank you to our deployed military personnel! The Sheriff's Office is proud of our employees who serve in the National Guard and Reserves. Deployed personnel receive special assistance with a program called SMART - Sheriff's Military Activation, Reintegration and Training. It provides support and training to our "citizen soldiers." The Professional Standards Division created SMART in 2010. In recent years, the U.S. military has given awards to the Sheriff's Office for our ongoing employee support efforts. HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE • 2010 ANNUAL REPORT • 19 Sheriff Richard W. Stanek is the 27th Sheriff of Hennepin County. He took office on January 1, 2007, to serve as the chief law enforcement officer of Minnesota's largest county by population, containing 1.3 million residents. A 27 -year veteran of law en- forcement, Sheriff Stanek be- gan his career with the Min- neapolis Police Department (MPD)where he rose through the ranks serving as a Patrol Officer, Detective, command- ing a Precinct on the east side of Minneapolis and finally earning a promotion to Com- mander of the MPD Criminal Investigations Division. Concurrent with his law enforce- ment career, he served five terms in the Minnesota House of Representatives where he chaired the House Crime Policy and Finance Committee. In 2003, he was appointed by the Gover- nor to lead Minnesota's largest law enforcement agency as Com- missioner of Public Safety and Director of Homeland Security. Chief Deputy Mike Carlson Inspector Kip Carver, Investigations Bureau Inspector Tracey Martin, Administrative Services Bureau Inspector Curtis Roberts, Detention /Court Services Bureau Inspector Jeff Storms, Enforcement Services Bureau Sheriff Stanek currently serves on the Department of Homeland Security's Interagency Threat Assessment and Coordination Group which, through a Presidential directive, allows for the sharing of terrorism - related information. He is a member of the national Criminal Intelligence Coordinating Council, advising the U.S. Attorney General and U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Sheriff Stanek has been elected vice president of the Major County Sheriffs' Association. He serves on the board of directors for the National Sheriffs' Association. He is an active member of the International Association of Chiefs of Police. Sheriff Stanek invests time with community- focused organiza- tions committed to working with youth. He serves as a board member for the Boys & Girls Clubs of the Twin Cities and Tree - house. At the helm of the Sheriff's Office, he has founded the Hennepin County Sheriff Foundation, which supports several initiatives including programs for at -risk youth. Sheriff Stanek graduated from the University of Minnesota with a bachelor's degree in criminal justice and earned a master's degree in public administration from Hamline University. Sergeant Matt Hollihan, Administrative Sergeant Sergeant Derwin Ellis, Community Outreach Liaison Lisa Kiava, Public Information Officer Julianne Ortman, Senior Administrative Manager Sandra Westerman, Intergovernmental Relations Retirements Pamela Bailey, Legal Secretary, 18 years Gary Charboneau, Detective, 33 years Kenneth Crane, Deputy, 10 years Joyce Croteau, Sr. Accountant, 18 years Fares Daoud, Detention Deputy, 24 years Patrick Denman, Deputy, 28 years Leanne Edberg, Telecommunicator, 21 years Donald Ennenga, Deputy, 28 years Daniel Kirby, Detective, 29 years Mark Lundeen, Sergeant, 27 years Velma Montgomery, Identification Clerk, 13 years Cheryl Schindeldecker, Office Specialist II1, 20 years In 2010, members of the Sheriff's Communications Division receive an award from the Association of Public Safety Communications Officials. Telecom municators were recognized for handling 911 and first responder communications during a large fire in Loretto, Minnesota. Their outstanding work included assistance in coordinating the response of 20 different fire departments. Promotions Spencer Bakke............ Joel Demarais ............. Devan Ellanson .......... Lindsey Engh ............. Willis Jacox ................ Shane Magnuson........ Lindsay Wedgewood .. .............................. ............................... Sergeant to Lieutenant .................... .........................Deputy to Crime Lab Technician .................... .........................Deputy to Crime Lab Technician .....................Principal Office Specialist to Evidence Specialist ................................... ............................... Deputy to Sergeant ............ ............................... Crime Lab Technician to Sergeant ............................ Sheriff's Clerk to Principal Office Specialist Awards -Sheriff's Medal of Valor Sgt. Brad Laudert for risking his life to rescue a child from a house fire. Sheriff's Citizen Medal of Valor Don Machacek for risking his life to rescue a family from a vehicle that went into a pond. Sheriff's Commendations Awards Detective Tom Sonenstahl for his proac- tive and diligent detective work in solving a crime spree. Deputy Cory Lee for quick actions and courage in responding to a man threaten- ing himself and others. Deputy Clayton Sedesky, Special Deputy Kyp Stavrou, Special Deputy Jeff Kleven, Special Deputy Tim Elness, Special Deputy Andrew Zroker, and Community Service Officer Ray Rojas (Maple Grove Police Dept.) for quick actions and courage in attempting to save the life of a driver whose vehicle was submerged in a pond. Unit Citation The Transport Unit for outstanding efforts to improve public safety and for ef- forts to build a stronger partnership with the Warrant Unit. Citizen Award of Merit Peggy Rasmussen, VJ. Smith and Sister Benita Kordiak for outstanding self- initi- ated work, and continued dedication and devotion to the community. Citizen. Commendation Awards John Villerius for diligent work with as- sisting a criminal investigation involving foreclosed properties. HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE • 2010 ANNUAL REPORT • 21 Brian Forkey for work with assisting a criminal investigation involving financial crimes. Ronald Trusell for assisting in the rescue of a man who nearly drowned in the Mis- sissippi River. Dianne Logeais and Stacy Wendt for assisting in the rescue of a person who nearly drowned in a community swim- ming pool. Jason Cariveau and Steven Smith for saving the life of a person who nearly drowned in a hotel swimming pool. Phillip Ramthun, Juan Trujillo, Mary Luella Forman, and Donna and Steven L. Keogh for attempting saving the life of a person who drowned. Tyler Conway, Blanca Garcia, Nicole Daeger, and Adara Bryan for performing CPR and rescuing a victim who nearly drowned at a community swimming pool. Mark and Catherine Welna, and Michael and Joanne Nicklaus for providing assis- tance to victims of a boating accident. Years of Service Awards for Special Deputies (Sheriff's Office volunteers) 35 Years, Special Deputy John Pink - Emergency Squad, 4,544 hours in just the last 10 years 30 Years, Special Deputy Craig Carlson - MARC, 526 hours Special Deputy Mark Kieffer - MARC, 1,004 hours 10 Years, Special Deputy Steen Erickson - Water Patrol, 1,850 hours 5 Years, Special Deputy Dori Skoog - Emergency Squad, 1,242 hours Special Deputy Kyp Stavrou - Emergency Squad, 1,030 hours Special Deputy Kathie Thompson - Emergency Squad, 1,108 hours Special Deputy Robert Stamm - Water Patrol, 1,377 hours Captains Award for Special Deputies (The award recognizes exceptional volunteer service.) Special Deputy Lieutenant Michael Hu- bred, Emergency Squad - Developed the training program for new volunteers with the Emergency Squad. Special Deputy Lieutenant Stephen Hart- man, MARC - Volunteered at Hurricane Katrina, the Cedar Rapids Iowa floods and the 1987 Twin Cities Super Storm. Special Deputy Arthur Hart, Mounted Patrol - Reorganized the Mounted Patrol and helped to expand its duties to in- clude public safety responsibilities such as search and rescue duties. Special Deputy Rich Siakel, Water Patrol - Completed Water Patrol Emergency Response Driving School. He has shown exceptional leadership by organizing events for crews and assigning deputies to responsibilities. The icons represent the nine lines of business for the Sheriff's Office. )ail, 911 /Dispatch, Patrol, Crime Lab, Investigations, Warrants, Court Security, Personnel /Training, Civil Process HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 350 South Fifth Street, Room 6 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415 612.348.3744 www.hennepinsherifforg OUR NINE LINES OF Just like ` Itow b e usinesses USINESS p°f the past fe h the miffs O f�e other unit and lev sips wites h oult econo as hat sa verall pos to h t ers in ass tra e' c tunes and mpleivene doing buses Se ha e orc nient th Public sa fervent new eff ie." etiinue o irde n d fewer - corn ty is an tify mPact c rnsl LeSS viol t invest oPacts vicurann d fewer suc rime rnent for and to fghti 1 God de 0 A 'I families nanciv resource g violent jnOnstrat rnPlishnie and of publ. s, and crime e e our co nts and Thank Ic safety Planning forth ively niamriltment YO r °u for the e future needs Prow, `e- 2011 Stratepportuni email toSheriffCdback to lan. I n share wit vite h cO•hennep n.Inn usding uanto Richar Nenne C n e - her OUR STRATEGIC FOCUS PRIORITIES 1. Fight violent crime and the lethal combination of guns, gangs, kids and drugs. 2. Advance capabilities and best practices in criminal information sharing & analysis to reduce and prevent crime. 3. Leverage innovative technology and forensic sciences to solve crime and reduce victimization across the county. 4. Build upon partnerships and collaborate with other law enforcement agencies, private partners and the community to improve public safety. 5. Lead in the preparation, training and response to emergencies, disasters and threats, including Homeland Security. 6. In service to the residents, provide leadership and education on issues of Public Safety. 7. Value the contribution of employees and volunteers of the Sheriffs Office and provide opportunities needed for skills enhancement and leadership development. 8. Serve as good stewards of taxpayer dollars through innovative e-arrd - -- prioritized management of resources. A • C7 11W� r.1, t7 �1 I I I 1k, wili d L.. 6� Jail Crime Lab �1� Court Security 911 /Dispatch Investigations Personnel/ Training Patrol Warrants Civil Process The Emergency Services Unit serves high -risk warrants and responds to incidents such as hostage rescue. The unit was awarded with the Sheriffs Office Unit Citation and the Entry Team for the unit was awarded the Medal of Valor after serving a warrant in 2010 in which a suspect fired 88 rounds of ammunition at deputies. The suspect was taken into custody without injury. The Sheriffs Office provides forensic services to law enforcement agencies across the county. In 2010, the Sheriffs Crime Lab was awarded one million dollars in federal stimulus funds to expand the DNA analysis program. In 2010, two law enforcement officers in Minnesota died in the line of duty in separate incidents. The Sheriffs Office was honored to pay tribute to Mahn - omen County Deputy Chris Dewey and Sergeant Joseph Bergeron of the Maplewood Police Department. In 2010, the number of law enforcement kiin the line of duty in the U.S. increased by 38 percent. _f" OUR 2011 GOALS Build a quality 911 Communications Facility in Plymouth that meets the current and future needs of the residents and first responders. Through technology, develop an effective data sharing system at the Sheriff's Crime Lab that will allow law enforcement agencies to access their cases, to reduce cost and improve service. Continue to focus on prescription drug abuse by expanding our Unwanted Medicine Collection Events and community prevention education. Continue community outreach services to include increased commu- nity visits, targeted Citizens' Academies, creation of a Youth Advisory Board, and a cadet program to encourage minority law enforcement recruits. Continue our partnerships with local law enforcement agencies by providing criminal information sharing & analysis services and devel- oping the new 2011 West Area Collaborative. Implement the statewide Lexipol policy manual system, a standard- ized risk management resource which incorporates policies that comply with federal, state and case law, regulatory actions and law enforcement best practices. SContinue to review jail medical costs for inmates, including medical services and prescription costs. (The Sheriffs Office is required to provide medically - necessary care to inmates.) Explore a potential for a secure lock -up area at HCMC in order to reduce costs for inmate medical care. This would result in savings for all law enforcement agencies throughout the county. Develop a centralized structure to K -9 services, to enhance training and deliver a more efficient use of their expertise as they provide services to law enforcement agencies throughout the metro. Expand and advance the use of interactive video conferencing which allows inmates to appear at certain court hearings without leaving the jail. This reduces the cost of transporting inmates to court facili- ties. Advocate for state and federal legislative platform to advance public safety and secure state and federal resources to supplement local property tax funding. Implement a Records Management System to better document and organize information throughout the criminal justice system. Partner with the non - profit Hennepin County Sheriff Foundation to Sprovide additional support and resources for Sheriffs Office special deputies and volunteers. MISSION DEDICATED TO INCREASING PUBLIC SAFETY THROUGH LEADERSHIP, INTEGRITY & STRONG PARTNERSHIPS VISION OUTSTANDING PUBLIC SAFETY THROUGH EXEMPLARY LEADERSHIP, DYNAMIC, COLLABORATIVE PARTNERSHIPS & INNOVATIVE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT. .q OUR 2010 ACCOMPLISHMENTS Continued reduction in violent crime: Since 2006, the rate of violent crime in Hennepin County has dropped approximately 32 %. Reduced DNA backlog: Using federal stimulus funds, we expanded our Crime Lab to reduce the turn around times for cases submitted from law enforcement agencies countywide. The Biology Section reduced the backlog of biology cases, which includes DNA cases, by 70% and solved violent crimes and property crimes. Completed the county's first Unwanted Medicine Collection Event: More than 700 citizens dropped off medications -- which helps prevent abuse or illegal sales. Reduced costs in the jail: HCSO began providing x -ray services inside of the jail. With criminal justice partners, HCSO began a program that allows inmates to appear in certain court hearings via interactive video conferencing. Both programs reduce the cost of transporting inmates. Conducted mental health training nationwide via a live webcast: Deputies provided instruction about innovative techniques developed for the care and custody of mentally ill jail inmates. Expanded community partnerships: We increased membership in the Sheriff's Community Advisory Board, residents who help establish our strategic direction and we created law enforcement classes for diverse communities. Provided effective criminal information sharing: The Sheriff's CISA Unit helps law enforcement agencies countywide to prevent and solve crime. CISA added new analysis services. CISA won a customer service award from Hennepin County for its service to local police. Secured approval for a new 911 Communications Facility: The current facility is 60+ years old and it must be replaced to ensure continued 911 services. Site selection & schematic design work has begun for a new facility. Continued water safety education: For the second year in a row, there have been no deaths on Lake Minnetonka. The Sheriff's Office added more safety classes for youth. Launched an email /text message system: At no cost to the Sheriff's Office, we are sending safety and crime alerts directly to citizens. (Sign up at www.nixle.com) • STRATEGIC UWA �� HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 350 SOUTH 5TH STREET ROOM 6 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415 (P) 612 - 348 -3740 (F) 612 - 348 -4208 WWW.HENNEPINSHERIFEORG