Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2011-06-21 COUNCIL MEETING
CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AGENDA 14161 L1111 0 1111 r ••• 71 JUNE 21, 2011 5:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS PRESENTATION A. James Zwilling — St. Louis Park Communications Coordinator B. Marney Olson — St. Louis Park Police Department Community Liaison V. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927 - 886172 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Tues Jun 21 Work Session — Neighborhood Associations 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Jun 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Jul 4 INDEPENDENCE DAY PARADE - 10:00 A.M. BEGINS AT CITY HALL Mon Jul4 INDEPENDENCE DAY HOLIDIAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Jul 5 Interviews Applicants ACB & HPB 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Jul 5 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues July 19 Work Session —Sports Dome 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Jul 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Aug 2 Night To Unite Wed Aug 3 Work Session With — Bike Edina Task Force 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Wed Aug 3 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Aug 15 Joint Meeting With Edina School Board 6:00 P.M. ? COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Aug 16 Work Session — Budget Review 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Aug 16 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Aug 23 or 30 Work Session With Park Board 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM ion Sept 5 LABOR DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed yes Sept 6 Work Session — Budget Review 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Sept 6 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Sept 20 Work Session With Energy & Environment Commission 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Sept 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS JUNE 21, 2011 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Ill. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AG EN DA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a' Member of the City' Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the ,Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Meeting of June 7, 2011 and Work Session of June 7, 2011. B. .Receive Payment Of Claims As Per: Pre -List Dated June 9, 2011, TOTAL $1m445,315.34; Pre -List Dated Jun 16, 2011, TOTAL $604,380.32 And Credit Card Purchases Dated 4/26/11— 5/25/11, TOTAL $5,941.35 C. 2012 Insurance Renewals 1) Property, 2) General Liability and 3) Workers Compensation D. Letters. of Support for Federal Transportation Funding for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail; West Segment and East Segment E. Award of Bid - Edina Aquatic Center FlowRider Addition F. Award of Bid — Fire Hydrants G. Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement - Minnehaha Woods Area H. Set Public Hearing (07/05/2011) - Valley View Sidewalk From McCauley Trail to Hilary Lane 1k Agenda/Edina City Council June 21, 2011 Page 2 V. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speaks on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Request for Minor Changes To Building — Waters Senior Housing Project B. Sketch Plan Review, JMS Homes, 5020 & 5024 Indianola Avenue C. Proposed Policy For Recording And Broadcasting City Commission Meeting D. Motion Endorsing Report To State Of Minnesota Authorizing The City's Participation In The Local Government Performance Measurement Program E. Resolution No. 2011 -68 Accepting Various Donations VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS VIII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS IX. MANAGER'S COMMENTS X. ADJOURNMENT y Agenda /Edina City Council June 21, 2011 Page 3 AGENDA EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA II. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval of Minutes of April 19, 2011 Regular Meeting B. Resolution No. 2011 -1 Approving Second Amendment To Easement & Parking Ramp Agreement For Jerry's Parking Ramp III. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952 - 927 - 886172 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Tues Jun 21 Work Session — Neighborhood Associations 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Jun 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Jul 4 INDEPENDENCE DAY PARADE - 10:00 A.M. BEGINS AT CITY HALL Mon Jul 4 INDEPENDENCE DAY HOLIDIAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Jul 5 Interviews Applicants ACB & HPB 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Jul 5 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues July 19 Work Session —Sports Dome 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Jul 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Aug 2 Night To Unite Wed Aug 3 Work Session With — Bike Edina Task Force 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Wed Aug 3 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Mon Aug 15 Joint Meeting With Edina School Board 6:00 P.M. ? COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Aug 16 Work Session — Budget Review 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Aug 16 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Aug 23 or 30 Work Session With Park Board 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Mon Sept 5 LABOR DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed ',jes Sept 6 Work Session — Budget Review 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM �s Sept 6 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Lies Sept 20 Work Session With Energy & Environment Commission 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Sept 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 7, 2011 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. 11. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. 111. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving the consent agenda with the exception of Items W.A., Approval of Minutes — Regular Meeting of May 17, 2011, Work Session of May 17, 2011 and Work Session Two of May 3, 2011; IV.H., Award of Bid Contract PIN 11 -1 — New Water Treatment Plant No. 6 (continued from May 17, 2011); IV.K, Engineering Proposal for Construction Phase Services for Water Treatment Plant No. 6; IV.M., Engineering Proposal for Bike Boulevard for Transit for Livable Communities; and, IV.N., Resolution 2011 -67, Approving Second Amendment to Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement for Jerry's Parking Ramp, as follows: IV.B. Review payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated May 19, 2011, and consisting of 29 pages; General Fund $314,031.96; Communications Fund $520.68; Police Special Revenue $2,224.45; Working Capital Fund $1,842.46; Equipment Replacement Fund $170,860.95; Art Center Fund $779.25; Golf Dome Fund $11,197.15; Aquatic Center Fund $8,000.27; Golf Course Fund $22,410.48; Ice Arena Fund $11,054.93; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $10,857.00; Liquor Fund $242,739.63; Utility Fund $60,376.99; Recycling Fund $38,820.60; PSTF Agency Fund $3,270.18; Payroll Fund $562.50; TOTAL $899,549.48 and for approval of payment of claims dated May 26, 2011, and consisting of 34 pages; General Fund $129,312.96; Communications Fund $1,595.46; Police Special Revenue $3,399.27; Working Capital Fund $133,133.47; Equipment Replacement Fund $134,031.55; Art Center Fund $1,135.13; Golf Dome Fund $156.57; Aquatic Center Fund $19,997.78; Golf Course Fund $15,066.00; Ice Arena Fund $3,800.10; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $11,006.70; Liquor Fund $186,999.86; Utility Fund $58,863.87; Storm Sewer Fund $10,102.28; Recycling Fund $32.69; PSTF Agency Fund $7,353.73; Payroll Fund $5,036.64; TOTAL $721,024.06 and for approval of payment of claims dated June 2, 2011, and consisting of 26 pages; General Fund $49,403.95; Communications Fund $285.00; Police Special Revenue $814.21; Working Capital Fund $106,888.32; Equipment Replacement Fund $5,431.40; Art Center Fund $16,584.62; Golf Dome Fund $2,765.00; Aquatic Center Fund Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 7. 2011 w $1,149.60; Golf Course Fund $16,927.96; Ice Arena Fund $1,081.09; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $23,355.03; Liquor Fund $130,923.86; Utility Fund $17,656.48; Storm Sewer Fund $7,974.03; PSTF Agency Fund $4,759.15; Payroll Fund $3,093.40; TOTAL $389.093.10 IV.C. Award of Bid Contract ENG 11 -1— West 691h Street Mill and Overlay, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Bituminous Roadways, Inc. at $105,788.00. IV.D. Award of Bid Contract ENG 11 -3 — Normandale /Valley View Roads and Interlachen Boulevard Sidewalks, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, G.L. Contracting, Inc. at $248,185.70. IV.E. Award of Bid Contract ENG 11 -6 — Carson's Hill Neighborhood Reconstruction, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Midwest Asphalt Corporation at $1,758,163.00. IV.F. Award of Bid Contract ENG 11 -7 — West 44th Street Improvements, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Northwest Asphalt, Inc. at $2,322,814.58. IV.G. Award of Bid Contract ENG 11 -10 — Golf Terrace Neighborhood Reconstruction, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Palda & Sons, Inc. at $2,221,734.11. V. W. Award of Bid 6enitra6l RW 13 1— Neffim `"92tar. Treaime m Plant 6 /e.er.tiwueed from AA-.v 17 IV.I. Adopt Resolution No. 2011 -64, Approving Cooperative Agreement Between the City of Bloomington and the City of Edina regarding Living Streets. IV.J. Adopt Resolution No. 2011 -66 Approving Special Assessment Agreement with Galleria Shopping Center. IV.L. Approve Engineering Proposal for material testing for ENG 10 -3 West 70th Street Improvements IV M fingineeFiRg 49posal fGF Bike- -an-i-de-var-d- for Transit for. I hiable Comm, inities, 1 \/__1►1_ Derwl..fGert "l A1'1_6 , APPPFG eiRg C /./� •mowed Pa Fk*Rg Ramp ,. -.,., tTCOtiltiitt711 Ct7 :i t7t t7 ItDt111 QCIVn Amen ment to �arenae�# A ffeemeRt ier lerr.ir PaFke Rg Fa R;p IV.O. Adopt Resolution 2011 -65, Approving Cooperative Agreement with BCA. IV.P. Adopt Resolution No. 2011 -53, Approving Joint Powers Agreement with City of Richfield regarding water service. IV.Q. Approve Engineering Proposal for Construction Phase Services for West 44th Street Improvements. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA IV.A. REGULAR AND WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 17, 2011, AND WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 3, 2011— APPROVED AS AMENDED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, correcting the regular meeting minutes of May 17, 2011, page seven, paragraph four, to add: "Member Swenson suggested a ioint meeting with the Planning Commission to discuss how rooftop dining could otentially be phased in at a later date this fall." Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 2 1, Minutes /Edina City Council /June 7. 2011 Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving the regular meeting minutes of May 17, 2011, as corrected, and the work session meeting minutes of May 17, 2011, and work session meeting minutes of May 3, 2011, as submitted. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV.H. AWARD OF BID CONTRACT PW 11 -1 — NEW WATER TREATMENT PLANT NO. 6 (CONTINUED FROM MAY 17, 2011) IV.K. ENGINEERING PROPOSAL APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES FOR WATER TREATMENT PLANT NO.6 IV.N. RESOLUTION 2011 -67 ADOPTED — APPROVING SECOND AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT AND PARKING RAMP AGREEMENT FOR JERRY'S PARKING RAMP Director of Public Works /City Engineer Houle provided an overview of the water treatment plant construction project to be located in the lowest level of Jerry's parking ramp that had been used to park maintenance equipment. He noted this project would eliminate the water treatment plant at 50th and Wooddale and combine treatment of four wells in the future. Staff noted the City had exclusive use of the lower level right -of -way easement, which would be acted on by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority at a later date. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving award of Bid Contract PW 11 -1, new Water Treatment Plant No. 6, to the recommended low bidder, Municipal Builders, Inc. at $5,668,800.00; authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to execute the Professional Service Agreement with AECOM Technical Services; and, introduction and adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -67, approving second amendment to Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement for Jerry's parking ramp. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV.M. ENGINEERING PROPOSAL FOR BIKE BOULEVARD FOR TRANSIT FOR LIVABLE COMMUNITIES TABLED 6GAITIN E-D TO JUNE 21, LzA11 Mr. Houle presented the request for design services for a bike boulevard, noting a $250,000 federal grant had been received for this project's infrastructure improvements. He stated staff had initially considered doing this project in- house, but determined the project was too involved. Mr. Houle explained that if an RFP process was required to use the grant for consulting services, this project would be delayed about a month and a half. Steve Clark, Transit for Livable Communities (TLC), stated the grant award had been approved in 2009, and the TLC Board had hoped this project would get underway in 2009. He explained that a firm sunset date on the funding was not set, but the Board's goal with all the projects was to get the very best outcome. For this reason, the Board was extremely patient with managing authorities. It was noted the goal of Congress when establishing this $25 million pilot program was to change travel behavior to reduce reliance on vehicles. Mr. Clark stated the Board's concern was that Edina's proposed project had become more of a share - the -road approach to erect signs or place sharrows in the roadways, which may not be enough to change travel behavior. With regard to funding consulting services from the grant, Mr. Clark explained that in 2009 the TLC allowed ten - percent of the total cost to be applied to engineering services. Since that time, Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 7, 2011 other jurisdictions have brought to the Board's attention that ten - percent was not enough because these of the large and often controversial scope of the projects. Mr. Clark stated the Board had become more flexible with the percentage allowed to cover engineering costs. Mr. Clark indicated he did not think an RFP process would be required. The Board would prefer to complete a project in 2012 that served the interests of this community as a model rather than rush the process and get a project that was less than satisfactory. In addition, if the project constructed should deviate from the design that the grant had been based on, the project could lose funding. The Council asked about the potential to receive an increased grant award if the project took more time to redesign and resulted in a groundbreaking and model project. Mr. Clark stated the Board would consider that request if convinced the project was an enhancement over the original submittal. In the case of Edina's project, Mr. Clark felt there was room for exploration to remove parking along Wooddale and place bike lanes so a stronger project could be created. Mr. Houle indicated that the Bike Edina Task Force -and- Edina TFanspeFtatien Gemmi«'^^ have has seen the feasibility study and application; however, the public process and informational meetings remain to be held in late July /early August. With regard to the sunset date, Mr. Clark explained there was not a firm sunset date, but the award letter for all projects funded in 2009 indicated the projects must be completed or well underway by 2010. If a project did not have much forward movement, the Board may consider reprograming those grant funds. The Board would want to know that Edina could complete a project where the grant investment resulted in a project meeting program goals. The Council emphasized that this project #+a4 had great value for Edina, noting the bikeway tr-a4 provided connectivity across the freeway with neighborhoods, and Southdale Center and a park with an outdoor pool. it was acknowledged there had been no visible progress as intended when the grant was given in 2009 and the design had been reduced to lane sharing and sharrows. Following discussion, the Council indicated its intent to move forward with the bicycle boulevard project, support the use of grant funds to pay for consulting services, and develop a showcase design so there was opportunity for additional grant funding. Mr. Clark was asked for assurances that this project had value to, and the support of TLC. Mr. Clark stated he found the Council's commitment to the project to be reassuring. He indicated he was not convinced that an RFP process would be required, but TLC would want to assure a level of commitment by both the Public Works Department staff and the selected consultant to work with TLC to create the best design feasible and engage the public. MT6lark advised- that TLC wa Mr. Houle recommended the Council consider a resolution stating its commitment to the bike boulevard project for submission to the TLC for its June board meeting. In addition, TLC could be asked for a written confirmation that an extension would be granted to the summer of 2012 to assure public participation and the development of a showcase bike trail design. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, directing staff to prepare a resolution of support for the Transit for Livable Communities Grant bike boulevard project. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 4 r Minutes /Edina City Council /June 7. 2011 Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, tabling consideration of the proposal for design services for the Transit for livable Communities Grant for a bike boulevard project. Member Sprague RPRRPR made a motion amending the original motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to also direct staff to seek grant dollars to fund consulting services. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion to amend carried. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried as amended. ;CITY ENGINEER'S COMMENTS Mr. I Houle reported that bids on the Council's agenda reflected a savings from the engineer's estimate ranging from four percent (roadway projects) up to fifteen percent. He added that fewer contractors were submitting bids and the bids were coming in closer to the engineer's estimates. The Council commended staff for its expertise and accuracy of estimating project costs. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V.A. DOUG JOHNSON DAY IN EDINA PROCLAIMED Mayor Hovland read in full a proclamation declaring "Doug Johnson Day" in Edina on June 11, 2011:, Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the proclamation declaring "Doug Johnson Day" in the City of Edina. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Doug Johnson, former Edina Public Schools Director of Community Education Services & Community Relations, stated his appreciation for this honor and commented on the importance of working together. The Council and audience responded with a round of applause. Vl. COMMUNITY COMMENT Jame Grotz, 5513 Park Place, addressed the Council regarding the Minnehaha Woods reconstruction project and concern that a larger water line would be required to obtain a future building permit. VII. REPORTS/RECOMMENDATIONS VII.A. REQUEST FOR MINOR CHANGES TO BUILDING — WATERS SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT — CONTINUED TO JUNE 21, 2011 Planning "Director Teague presented the proposed changes to the building proposed for the Waters Senior Housing project to reduce the building by 28 feet, which would reduce the infrastructure cost and enable them to provide seven affordable units. The building modification would eliminate 36 of the 90 underground parking spaces. Twelve of these spaces were double spaces primarily used for car /boat storage. Of the 73 surface spaces, three would be lost, leaving 124 total parking spaces. Mr. Teague noted the preliminary plat approval had expired so the proponent must make a new .application for consideration at public hearings by the Planning Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 7. 2011 Commission and City Council. He explained that staff considered the proposed these changes to be minor; however, if the Council believed the changes were significant enough for further review, the proposal could be referred to the Planning Commission for an amendment to the site plan approval. Jay Jensen, Waters Senior Living, confirmed that 28 feet of common area would be removed from the middle of the building to help fund the seven affordable housing units. Mr. Jensen stated the removal of the 28 feet of common area would not affect the operation of the project. The Council discussed the threshold under which a revision would be considered a "minor change" and acknowledged a -mails asking that staff not be allowed to make this decision. The Council .indicated that after study of the materials, it would support a two -week continuation to give the public an opportunity to submit written comment. The majority of the Council indicated the proposed revision would not meet the threshold of requiring a public hearing. Member Bennett referenced Code Section 850.04, sub. 9, Changes to Approved Final Site Plan, and explained why she found the specificity of the code language allowed no other opportunity but to send this revision back to the Planning Commission for consideration and a public process. She noted the change resulted in a reduction in the building and also in parking. Member Bennett said the ordinance language does not reference whether the change involved a reduction or lessened intensity of the use. The Council debated the issue and indicated the threshold for "minor change" would be addressed at the June 21, 2011, meeting. It was noted staff had determined, in its professional opinion, the requested change was minor and could be considered by staff or the Council without going through a public hearing process. The Council agreed that if its majority did not find the changes to be minor, the application would be remanded to the Planning Commission. It was acknowledged that the proponent stated that the proposal would be withdrawn if not approved as a minor change, and the project built as approved without any units designated affordable. 8F; housing The Council indicated this was "new ground ", so it preferred to err on the side of caution and obtain public comment prior to making a determination. It was noted the Council's policy was to consider the request if changes were made to the final plan. Mr. Teague stated this had been the policy for two years, that it had worked well, and he recommended the policy be codified into the ordinance. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to continue consideration of proposed changes to the Waters Senior Housing project to allow time to identify the impacted area, provide mailed notice that this item would be considered at the June 21, 2011, meeting, and request electronic comment. Ayes: Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Bennett Motion carried. VII.B. RESOLUTION NO. 2011-58 ADOPTED — ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the Page 6 Minutes /Edina City Council /dune 7.2011 donations. Member Brindle introduced. and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -58 accepting various donations. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.C. PARK BOARD REAPPOINTMENT APPROVED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, approving Park Board reappointment of David Deeds with to a term expiring an explication date a February 1, 2014. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VILD.` ORDINANCE NO.2011 -07 ADOPTED — PROHIBITING ROOFTOP DINING Mr.. Teague' reviewed that at its May 17, 2011 meeting, the Council had :directed staff to draft an ordinance that prohibited rooftop dining. It was noted that a Planning Commission work session would be scheduled to discuss rooftop restaurants and the Council's concerns related to such a use. The Council discussed a language revision to address podium or balcony dining. Member Swenson made a. motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2011 -07, amendment prohibiting rooftop restaurants in the City of Edina, as revised to indicate: "A restaurant or any portion of a restaurant open to customers, on the roof covering any part of the building or restaurant." Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swan n, Hovland Motion carried. VII.E. ORDINANCE. NO. 2011 -10 ADOPTED — AMENDING SECTION 1509 TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Assistant City Engineer Sullivan presented revised Ordinance No. 2011 -10 amending Section 1509 regarding'- the .Edina Transportation Commission's (ETC) purpose and duties. He stated the ETC met on May. 19, 2011, to discuss the Council's concerns expressed at its May 17, 2011, meeting . relating. to the potential process for capital improvement project review and citizen traffic complaint :reports. Mr. Sullivan explained that a sample document would be drafted that could be attached to the. ETC's bylaws to assure all understood the process and timeline. The Council indicated support for the amendment that provided structure for the `ETC to be visionary and allow an opportunity to interact with issues raised that affect traffic. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to grant First and waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2011 -10, amending the Edina City Code concerning the Transportation Commission. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Hovland Motion carried. Vlll. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS — Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. IX. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received IX.A. FOURTH OF JULY PARADE —COMBINED ENTRY APPROVED Page 7 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 7, 2011 Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, that the Council support a combined entry, to the extent possible, in the 2012 Fourth of July parade. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Hovland Motion carried. X. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received XI. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:07 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, June 21, 2011. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the June 7, 2011, meeting available. Page 8 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 7, 2011 5:37 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:37 p.m. Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, and Mayor Hovland. Mayor Hovland left the meeting at 6:15 p.m. and returned at 6:45 p.m. Mayor Pro Tern Swenson chaired in his absence. Staff attending the meeting included: Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications & Marketing Director; Sherry Engelman, City Sanitarian; Steve Grausam, Liquor Operations Director; Wayne Houle, Engineer /Public Works Director; John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation; Jeff Long, Police Chief; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Scott Neal, City Manager; Eric Roggeman, Assistant Finance Director; Marty Scheerer, Fire Chief; Ceil Smith, Assistant to the City Manager; Cary Teague, City Planning Director and John Wallin, Finance Director. Mayor Hovland stated the purpose of the meeting was to review the schedule for development of the 2012 Operating Budget. Manager Neal informed the Council that staff was seeking direction as to the Council's wishes regarding the development of the 2012 Operating Budget. He noted there were some statutory mandates that the City must follow in developing a budget. Mr. Neal said levy limits of some form were anticipated for the next budgeting cycle, and this year's budget will be developed for a two -year cycle, noting that as with the CIP, the second year would be more of a forecast p4R (with the 2012 the actual firm budget.) Mr. Neal stated direction was needed regarding splitting the trust fund for Centennial Lakes and Edinborough Park, suggested development of a separate "Severance Fund ", stated his intention of rolling the Communications Enterprise into the General Fund of the City and briefly spoke of the enterprise business plans. Assistant Finance Director Roggeman reviewed the proposed schedule for the development of the 2012 Operating Budget noting: • 6/7/2011 - Budget process planning work session • 8/16/2011 — Work session for review of preliminary levy, General Fund Budget, Utility Fund Budget and CIP • 9/6/2011— Adoption of preliminary levy at regular meeting • 9/13/2011 & 10/11/2011— Park Board discusses CIP and park and recreation fees and charges and makes recommendations to City Council • 9/20/2011— Work session for review of first half of enterprise budgets and CIP • 10/4/2011— Work session for review of second half of enterprise budgets and CIP • 10/18/2011— Work session for review of draft utility rate study • 11/1/2011— Work session for review of the final levy and budget • 11/1/2011— Regular meeting consideration of CIP and final utility rate study • 12/6/2011 — Public hearing for final levy and First Reading for 2012 Fees & Utility Charges Ordinance Minutes — Work Session /Edina City Council /June 7, 2011 • 12/20/2011— Regular meeting for adoption of final levy and adoption of 2012 Fees and Utility Charges Ordinance Mr. Roggeman stated this was a starting point for the Council to review and decide how they wished to proceed with developing the 2012 Budget. The Council discussed whether or not to have a rate study completed, the timing of Council reviews of the draft budgets and CIP, Park Board's time constraints and need for budget information in reviewing the CIP and fees, the potential 50/50 split of the Centennial Lakes and Edinborough, Park Trust Fund for illustration purposes, whether utility companies should be put on notice of a possible franchise fee, the desire to design some form of public engagement that would allow public input into the budgeting process to take place in August or September, the timing of consultant reports for r °R+ ^RR',' Lakes Braemar Golf Course and Edinborough Park, which union contracts will be negotiated for 2012, t#e when results of the salary study will be available and the timing of the Decision Resources Survey data release. Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:54 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, June 21, 2011 James B. Hovland, Mayor Page 2 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/9/2011 -6/9/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No - Subledger Account Description 347795 61912011 102403 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE:PRODUCT 345.42 BLACK DIRT, MULCH 00001903. 263713 35020 1643.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 345.42 347796 6/9/2011 124613 ABM JANITORIAL - NORTH CENTRAL 2,695.87 JANITORAL SERVICES 263715 2576973 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,695.87 .347797 6/912011 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 61.60 263377 0814466 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 74.80 263378 0620487. 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 97.20 263620 0814513 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 233.60 347798 61912011 102872 ADAMS GOLF 150.53 GOLF CLUBS 263461 91491115 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 150.53 - 347799 6/912011 105162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 873.12 FINAL PAYMENT OOOALARM263462 105811706 5420.6250 ALARM SERVICE 873.12 347800 6/912011 127114 ALTERNATIVE BUSINESS FURNITURE 951.72 CHAIR, FILE CABINET 263303 38352 421305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 133.59 PAINT CABINET 263714 38801 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,085.31 347801 61912011 127365 AMERICAN FLEET SUPPLY 16.86 WIPER BLADES 00005088 263545 AFS- 211510002 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 16.86 347802 6/912011 129138 AMERICAN NEEDLE 6/8/2011 8:08:53 Page- 1 GENERAL TURF CARE CITY HALL GENERAL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CLUB HOUSE STREET EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 179.76 HATS 263463 65493 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 179.76 347803 61912011 102172 APPERT'S'FOODSERVICE 614.51 FOOD. 263464 - 1570044 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 614.51 347804 61912011 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 111.46 COFFEE 263465 912609 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 111.46 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/8/2011 8:08:53 Council Check Register Page - 2 6/9/2011 - 6/912011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 347806 61912011 114476 ARMOR SECURITY INC. 144.28 MONITORING SERVICE 00001056 263466 153015 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 96.19 00001057 263467 153016 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 240.47 347806 61912011 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 33.00 263468 060111 5821.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 33.28 263468 060111 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 46.03 263468 060111 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDGIMAINT 59.18 263468 060111 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 73.92 263468 060111 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 82.60 263468 060111 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 84.97 263468 060111 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 90.08 263468 060111 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 101.98 263468 060111 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 153.35 263468 060111 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 197.25 263468 060111 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 238.05 263468 060111 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 238.25 263468 060111 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 311.54 263468 060111 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 311.55 263468 060111 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 319.55 263468 060111 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 374.03 263468 060111 5311.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL POOL OPERATION 381.40 263468 060111 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 618.12 263468 060111 5620.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 3.748.13 347807 6/912011 102573 ASSOCIATION OF RECYCLING MANAG 20.00 WORKSHOP 263469 060111 5952.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS RECYCLING 20.00 347808 61912011 104069 B.B. WATSON GRAPHIC DESIGN 84.63 BUSINESS CARDS 263304 478 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 84.63 347809 6/912011 100638 BACHMAN'S 119.06 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE FLOWERS0006303 263716 104659367 2410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BRAEMAR MEMORIAL FUND 119.06 347810 61912011 120814 BAGGALLINIINC. 88.44 MERCHANDISE 263470 IVC00389944 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CITY OF EDINA .6/8/2011 8:08:53 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 3 6/9/2011 - 6/912011 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 109.82 MERCHANDISE 263471 IVC00390521 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 198.26 347811 6/912011 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 854.16 263379 58513700 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 388.85 263380 58513900 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 78.44 263381 85251900 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 476.55 263621 58602400 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 135.68 263622 85252100 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,933.68 - 347812 619/2011 117379 - BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 591.76 - LAWN CARE 263717 137374 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY 591.76 347813 61912011 116067 BENSON, RON.PAUL 39.00 ART WORK SOLD 263696 052611 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 39.00 347814 6/912011 104579 BERGFORD, BARBARA 48.00 TRIP REFUND 263718 060111 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 48.00 347815 6/9/2011 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 44.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES 263205 WO- 695986 -1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 71.45 OFFICE SUPPLIES 263206 WO- 695389 -1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 622.63 OFFICE SUPPLIES 263305 WO- 696382 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 738.80 347816 61912011 105120 BIGELOW, DEBBIE 150.00 PERFORMANCE 6 /16/11 263694 060111 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 347817 61912011 125209 BISEK, KATIE 83.13 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 263719 060611 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 83.13 347818 619/2011 100653 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC. 3,975.00 PAVING ON CART PATH 00006060 263207 18180 5422.6251 SHARED MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 147.68 ASPHALT 00001835 263306 18151 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 0 4,122.68 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/9/2011 - 6/912011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 347819 6/9/2011 119679 BIXBY PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE 34.34 TOILET SERVICE 00001050 263208 25656 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 94.34 263209 25657 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 34.34 263210 25658 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 34.34 263211 25659 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 197.36 347820 61912011 129196 BJERKNESS, ODELL 31.33 ART WORK SOLD 263697 052611 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 31.33 347821 61912011 120510 BLOOMINGTON CUSTOM EMBROIDERY 511.00 POLOS 263720 30096 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 511.00 347822 619/2011 124151 BLUE BOOK 92.95 MINNESOTA BLUE BOOKS 263472 2785 1400.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS 92.95 347823 619/2011 102545 BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD 90.85 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 263473 GERTRUDE NULSEN 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 90.85 347824 61912011 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 42.55 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 263546 68771 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 95.97 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 263546 68771 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 34.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 263547 68833 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 18.82- RETURN 263548 5020CM 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 153.95 347825 61912011 117411 BONK, RICHARD 41.60 ART WORK SOLD 263699 053111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 41.60 347826 6/912011 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 4,688.39 BOLLARDS 263721 902431098 44005.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 4,688.39 347827 619/2011 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 58.82 GASKETS, SEAL 00005931 263307 518865 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 117.82 GASKETS, SEALS 00005934 263308 519866 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 6.32 RING, ISOLATOR 00005934 263309 519869 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 6/812011 8:08:53 Page - 4 Business Unit FIELD MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ENGINEERING GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING ART CENTER REVENUES CITY HALL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 618/2011 8:08:53 Page- 5 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GRILL ART CENTER REVENUES 200.00 PERFORMANCE 6 /14/11 263690 CITY OF EDINA 5631.6136 R55CKREG LOG20000 CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 200.00 Council Check Register 61912011 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 6/9/2011 -6/9/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation - PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description PRINTING VERNON SELLING 68.65 OIL SEAL ASSEMBLY 00005051 263549 524511 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 25000 5822.6575 86.62 SOIL SEAL, HARDWARE KIT 00065051 263550 524378 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EDINA LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 263475 338.23 5842.6575 PRINTING -- YORK SELLING 347828 6/912011 122496 BREAKTIME BEVERAGE INC. 347832 1,115.60 CANDY 263474 2340:028033 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,115.60 1;351.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 347829 61912011 1470.4329 101752 BRISCOE, ROBERT _ FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,351.00 39.00 ART WORK SOLD 263698 053111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 347833 6/912011 39.00 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 347830 6/912011 121118 BRUESKE, JEFF 892.09 MERCHANDISE 263476 618/2011 8:08:53 Page- 5 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GRILL ART CENTER REVENUES 200.00 PERFORMANCE 6 /14/11 263690 060111 -, 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 200.00 347831 61912011 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 176.26 EDINA LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 263475 25000 5862.6575 PRINTING VERNON SELLING 176.27 EDINA LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 263475 25000 5822.6575 PRINTING: 50TH ST SELLING 176.27 EDINA LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 263475 25000 5842.6575 PRINTING -- YORK SELLING 528.80 347832 6/9/2011 129195 CALLAHAN, MARGARET 1;351.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 263722 060111 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES _ FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,351.00 347833 6/912011 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 892.09 MERCHANDISE 263476 922526997 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 136.63 GOLF BALLS 263477 922542433 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 97.12 MERCHANDISE 263478 922548768 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,125.84 347834 6/912011 129186 CANVAS CRAFT INC. 75.10 FABRICATE A BOX. COVER ,00001887 263212 18936 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 75.10 347835 6/9/2011 127500 CAPITAL MAINTENANCE SERVICES L _d 941.34 JUNE CLEANING SERVICES 263723 86654 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 941.34 347836 61912011 119465 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES las as 9836 73 908710 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 618/2011 8:08:53 Council Check Register Page - 6 6/9/2011 - 6/9/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 70.00 263624 908711 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,435.85 347837 6/9/2011 100678 CARLSON PRINTING CO. 189.37 PUTTING PUNCH CARDS 00002082 263551 00098983 5631.6575 PRINTING CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 189.37 347838 61912011 121654 CARLSON, JACKIE 19.50 ART WORK SOLD 263700 052411 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 19.50 347839 61912011 102064 CASH REGISTER SALES & SERVICE 135.00 PROGRAM REGISTERS AT POOL 263552 060111 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL ADMINISTRATION 135.00 347840 61912011 129193 CECERE, KIRSTEN 10.91 SEASON TICKET REFUND 263724 053111 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 150.00 SEASON TICKET REFUND 263724 053111 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 160.91 347841 6/912011 120613 CHATTERTON, LINDA 9.75 ART WORK SOLD 263705 052411 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 9.75 347842 61912011 129197 CHESTER, PERCI 500.00 EDINA PUBLIC ART COMMITTEE 263701 053111 4105.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC ART 500.00 347843 61912011 124964 CHIDESTER, THERESA 6.18 ART WORK SOLD 263702 052411 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 6.18 347844 6/9/2011 129198 CHILDERS, DOROTHY 1.95 ART WORK SOLD 263703 052411 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 1.95 347845 6/912011 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 48.95 00077443 - 0332300004 263725 332300004 -5/11 1646.6189 SEWER & WATER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 48.95 347846 61912011 105693 CITYSPRINT 36.25 COURIER SERVICES 263726 22679 01355.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -355 GOLF TERRACE N'HOOD CITY OF EDINA 6/8/2011 8:08:53 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 7 6/9/2011 —6/912011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No . Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 36.25 347847 61912011 114648 CIZEK, DARIN 29.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 262231 051611 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 29.99 347848 6/912011 101119 COCKRIEL, VINCE 84.66 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 263727 060311 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 84.66 347849 6/912011 120433 COMCAST 74.95 8772'10614 0165667 263479 165667 -5/11 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 59.00 6772 10 614 0199138 263480 199138 -5/11 5422.6188 TELEPHONE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 88.28 263728 177449 -5/11 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 222.23 347850 6/912011 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 1,160.19 ASPHALT 00001837 263310 051511 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,160.19 347851 61912011 116356 CONSTRUCTION MIDWEST INC. 46.38 GROUT FOR DRAINS 263213 468732 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 46.38 347852 6/9/2011 100697 COOL AIR MECHANICAL INC. 2,138.34 BOILER REPAIR 00008032 263214 74425 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 2,138.34 347863 61912011 124487 CORDES, ANN 1.55 ART WORK SOLD 263704 052411 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 1.55 347854 619/2011 120538 CREATIVE GRAPHICS 330.94 RAIN CHECKS 00006302 263215 00058399 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 330.94 347855 61912011 121164 CROMULENT SHAKESPEARE COMPANY 150.00 PERFORMANCE 6119/11 263695 060111 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTE14NIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 347856 6/912011 124335 CUMELLA, COLLETTE 7.80 ART WORK SOLD 263706 052411 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/8/2011 8:08:53 Council Check Register Page - 8 6/9/2011 -6/9/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 7.80 347857 619/2011 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. INC. 222.44 MUFFLER, HEADLIGHTS 00001897 263553 153791 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 222.44 347858 61912011 120535 DAKOTA WILD ANIMALS LLC 150.00 PERFORMANCE 6114/11 263691 060111 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 347859 619/2011 104020 DALCO 522.73 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00008010 263216 2335076 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 95.12- RETURN 263217 2335076 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 215.89 PUNCH DEGREASER 00005020 263311 2335592 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 114.10 AIR FRESHENER 00001723 263554 2335510 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 757.60 347860 6/9/2011 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 21.50 263362 602877 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,920.95 263383 602878 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,186.80 263384 602879 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 44.80 263385 602880 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,223.95 263625 602882 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 44.80 263626 602881 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5,442.80 347861 61912011 118490 DEEP ROCK WATER COMPANY 42.12 622833 WATER 263729 7234289 5621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 42.12 347862 6/9/2011 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 50.11 TOOLS 00001926 263218 585664 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 50.11 347863 61912011 122135 DENFELD, SCOTT 39.78 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 263481 053111 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 39.78 347864 61912011 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 77.89 BAKERY 263219 370272 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 62.83 BAKERY 263482 370429 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 100.57 BAKERY 263483 370443 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/9/2011 — 619/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 36.70 BAKERY 263484 370823 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 50.67 BAKERY 263730 370885 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 328.66 25398 1553.6180 422.00 347865 61912011 118375 DEPAUL LETTERING 347867 619/2011 39.00 SWAT SHIRTS 263312 6536 1401.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 6/812011 8:08:53 Page - 9 Business Unit GRILL GRILL EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 39.00 50TH STREET RUBBISH PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH GENERAL SUPPLIES 347866 61912011 129191 DICK & RICK'S AUTO INTERIORS 422.00 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005023 263555 25398 1553.6180 422.00 347867 619/2011 123995 -.DICK'SILAKEVILLE SANITATION IN - 3,409.50 REFUSE 263313 1241116 4095.6103 3,243.19 REFUSE 263314 1240363 4095.6103 6,652.69 347868 6/912011 101766 DISPLAY SALES 399.06 US FLAGS 00001071 263556 INVO079356 1646.6406 399.06 347869 6/912011 112663 DOLLARS & SENSE 683.33 DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING. 263485 27454 5822.6122 683.33 DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING 263485 27454 5842.6122 683.34 DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING 263485 27454 5862.6122 2,050.00 347870 61912011 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES 6,631.72 CHEMICALS. 00001840 263557 82700682 -11 5915.6586 6,631.72 347871 61912011 103594 EDINALARM INC. 179.97 ALARM MONITORING SERVICE 263731 66529 5422.6188 179.97 347872 6/9/2011 118010 EGAN, BILL 305.29 MUSKRAT CONTROL 263220 052311 5422.6180 305.29 347873 6/912011 100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 2,195.00 ARBITRAGE MONITORING 263315 61862 3101.6103 2,195.00 6/812011 8:08:53 Page - 9 Business Unit GRILL GRILL EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT TELEPHONE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL DEBT SERVICE REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/8/2011 8:08:53 Council Check Register Page - 10 6/9/2011 - 6/9/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Suhledger Account Description Business Unit 347874 619/2011 129199 ELLIOT, STEVE 500.00 EDINA PUBLIC ART COMMITTEE 263707 053111 4105.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC ART 500.00 347875 61912011 117483 ENGLE, LEE 150.00 PERFORMANCE 6/15/11 263692 060111 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 347876 6/912011 102179 EULL'S MANUFACTURING CO INC. 463.84 CTS FORMS 00001125 263558 000605 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 463.84 347877 619/2011 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 112.42 FAN CONTROLLER 00005969 263316 1- 3642031 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 432.84 CODE READER KIT 00005969 263317 1- 3643191 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 207.28 MOTOR/FAN ASSEMBLY 00005969 263318 69- 038433 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 181.51 PLUGS, WIRE KIT, DIST CAP 00005969 263559 69- 038442 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 53.91 SENSOR 00005969 263560 69- 038513 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 75.75 FILTERS 00005969 263561 69- 038238 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 126.27 REMAN ALTERNATOR 00005969 263562 69- 038613 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5.33 DEGREASER 00005969 263563 69-038674 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 65.54 FILTERS 00005969 263564 69- 038807 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 26.59 BULBS 00005969 263565 69- 038806 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 30.40 RADIATOR FAN ASSEMBLY 00005026 263566 69- 039089 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 53.91 FILTER ELEMENT 00005026 263567 69- 038924 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 104.46 SENSORS 00005969 263732 69- 038507 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,476.21 347878 619/2011 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL 18.50 T2- 301427 STAFF PHOTOS 263486 8326063 2210.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 18.50 347879 61912011 106035 FASTENAL COMPANY 373.99 NUTS, BOLTS 00005043 263319 MNTC2106231 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 30.82 SETSCREWS 263733 MNTC2106299 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 404.81 347880 61912011 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 658.03 CS PARTS 00001174 263221 501305303.001 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 658.03 I 6/8/2011 8:08:53 Page- 11 Business Unit PUBLIC ART BUILDING MAINTENANCE -- EDINBOROUGH PARK DISTRIBUTION CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ENGINEERING GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 67.00 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 347887 6/912011 122414 FORKLIFTS OF MINNESOTA INC. 271.93 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS Council Check Register 01S2030490 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 216.30 6/9/2011 - 6/9/2011 - Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description. 347881 6/9/2011 129200 FISCHER, STEPHEN J 653.03 500.00 EDINA PUBLIC ART COMMITTEE 263708 053111 4105.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 500.00 67.32 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 263738 060211 347882 6/912011 104270 FLARE HEATING & AIR CONDITIONI 67.32 3,295.00 INSTALL AIR CONDITIONER 00001047 263222 0020465 -IN 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6,686.00 INSTALL AIR CONDITIONING 00002128 263734 0020478 -IN 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1006143279 5422.6201 9,981.00 77.27 263225 347883 61912011 LAUNDRY 100759 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY 154.54 69.47 KEYS 00001143 263568 241439 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 69.47 178.07 GARAGE DOOR REPAIR 00001988 263569 347884 61912011 REPAIR PARTS 126851 FLUTE COCKTAIL 150.00 PERFORMANCE 6/13/11 263689 060111 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 150.00 347885, 61912011 101476 FOOTJOY 51.24 MERCHANDISE 263487 3748643 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 51.24 347886 619/2011 129185 FOREMOST PROMOTIONS 67.00 SAFETY STICKERS 00003577 263223 127076 1470.6614 FIRE PREVENTION 6/8/2011 8:08:53 Page- 11 Business Unit PUBLIC ART BUILDING MAINTENANCE -- EDINBOROUGH PARK DISTRIBUTION CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ENGINEERING GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 67.00 347887 6/912011 122414 FORKLIFTS OF MINNESOTA INC. 271.93 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 00005034 263735 01S2030490 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 216.30 LIFT INSPECTION 00005035 263736 01S2040920 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 164.80 LIFT INSPECTION 00005036 263737 0152040930 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 653.03 347888 61912011 108351 FOSTER, REBECCA 67.32 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 263738 060211 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 67.32 347889 6/912011 100764 G & K SERVICES 77.27 SHOP TOWELS 263224 1006143279 5422.6201 LAUNDRY 77.27 263225 1006167297 5422.6201 LAUNDRY 154.54 347890 61912011 127385 GARAGE DOOR STORE 178.07 GARAGE DOOR REPAIR 00001988 263569 18358 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS 6/8/2011 8:08:53 Page- 11 Business Unit PUBLIC ART BUILDING MAINTENANCE -- EDINBOROUGH PARK DISTRIBUTION CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ENGINEERING GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENT SVC PW BUILDING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/8 /2011 8:08:53 Council Check Register Page - 12 6/9/2011 -6/9/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 193.05 GARAGE DOOR REPAIR 00001989 263570 18441 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 371.12 347691 61912011 123080 GARDEN VIEW GREENHOUSE 1,427.01 FLOWERS 00006459 263226 1148 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 915.38 FLOWERS 00006460 263227 1147 5422.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,342.39 347892 61912011 105172 GARLAND'S INC. 51.21 WHEELS, BEARINGS 00001280 263571 5178043 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 51.21 347893 61912011 101662 GCSAA 170.00 DUES - ROBERT ATOL 263488 226552 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 170.00 347894 61912011 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 180.00 TENNIS COACH SHIRTS 263320 81947 1623.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION 1,734.00 TENNIS SHIRTS 263321 81948 1623.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION 1,914.00 347895 619/2011 103185 GERTENS 978.66 TREES 00001905 263739 221697 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 978.66 347896 61912011 124541 GEYEN GROUP 293.91 SPOT CLEANING - CARPET 263489 21319 5420.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLUB HOUSE 293.91 347897 61912011 127615 GILGENBACH, JORDAN 169.27 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 263490 053111 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 169.27 347898 6/9/2011 129184 GOLDEN VALLEY HEATING & AIR IN 4,288.00 114STALL AIR CONDITIONER 00001051 263228 GRANGE HALL 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 4,288.00 347899 61912011 100778 GOODIN COMPANY 285.32 DRAIN EXTENSIONS 00007045 263229 01963736 -00 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 63.75 STRAINER EXTENSION 263491 01964559-01 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 52.97 STRAINER EXTENSION 00007046 263492 01964559 -00 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 402.04 CITY OF EDINA 6/8/2011 8:08:53 -) R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 13 6/9/2011 - 61912011 Check # Date Amount - Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 347900 61912011 101103 GRAINGER 155.98. EAR MUFFS 00001929 263230 9543826144 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 7.74 GRINDING WHEELS 00001929 263231 9543826136 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 75.74 HIGH MOUNT ADAPTERS 00006068 263232 9540528560 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 18.03 FLAG HOOKS 00006283 263233 9535275037 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 44.09 SAFETY GLASSES 00006283 263234 9529253867 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT.OF COURSE & GROUNDS 39.25 LIGHT FIXTURE 000011;11 263235 9537544752 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 119.67 LADDER 00001111 263235 9537544752 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 200.88 DEGREASER, SAFETY EYEWEAR 263236 9542541819 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 16.97 LINERS 263237 9542541827 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 16.87 LINERS 263238 9543339056 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 44.25 PUMP 263239 9544835243 7413.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF FIRE TOWER 41.49 PRESS_ URE GAUGES 00007053 263322 9547844754 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 367.05 PAINT 00001138 263572 9546582264 5913.6532 PAINT DISTRIBUTION 4.09 CAUTION TAPE 00001159 263573 9539974536 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 257.17 LOAD BINDERS, GLOVES 00001159 263574 9539615097 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 8.17 CAUTION TAPE . 00001159 263575 9539615089 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 9.93 V -BELTS 263740 9547679788 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES . PSTF RANGE 55.60 LIGHT BULBS, DUCT TAPE 00002132 263741 9546255739 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,482.97 347901 6/912011 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 2,751.00 263627 128492 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,751.00 347902 61912011 101618 GRAUSAM, STEVE 185.13 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 263493 060111 5840.6107 MILEAGE.OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 185.13 347903 61912011 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 1,200.52 ELECTRICAL ITEMS 00001185 263240 954033290 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 1,200.52 347904 619/2011 101350 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 688.50 START UP LAWN IRRIGATION 00001200 263576 111558 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 688.50 347905 6/912011 100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT 269.10 TRIMMER HEAD AND LINE 00001042 263241 95912 1641.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MOWING 201.99 WEED WHIP. 00001046 263242 13712 1641.6556 TOOLS MOWING 853.93 GENERATOR - VAN VALKENBURG 00001041 263577 13799 1642.6556 TOOLS FIELD MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/8/2011 8:08:53 Council Check Register Page - 14 6/9/2011 — 6/9/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,325.02 347906 61912011 104459 GS DIRECT INC. 72.45 PAPER 00001194 263323 278562 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 952.79 TONER CARTRIDGES 00001194 263324 278930 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 1,025.24 347907 6/912011 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 158.85 THERMAL PAPER 00007515 263578 97303 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 158.85 THERMAL PAPER 00007516 263742 96628 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 317.70 347908 6/912011 129205 HARRIS MECHANICAL SERVICES LLC 672.00 CO SENSOR TESTING 263743 507000640 1550.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 672.00 347909 61912011 100797 HAWKINS INC. 6,031.80 CHEMICALS 00001841 263243 3224786 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 6,031.80 347910 6/912011 100799 HEDBERG AGGREGATES INC. 3,726.77 PAVERS 00002063 263494 776130 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,534.55 PAVERS 00002063 263495 776134 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 5,261.32 347911 61912011 128367 HEFTY GRAPICS INC. 183.79 PUTTING COURSE BROCHURES 00002077 263496 11050009 5631.6575 PRINTING CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 183.79 347912 6/912011 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 282.24 MEAT PATTIES 263744 023201 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 282.24 347913 61912011 106436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 160.31 TECHNICAL SUPPORT 263325 110562024 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 160.31 347914 6/9/2011 101215 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFF[ 926.54 APRIL 2010 ROOM & BOARD 263326 3608 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES 926.54 347915 6/912011 106371 HENNEPIN FACULTY ASSOCIATES 6/8/2011 8:08:53 Page - 15 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL GRILL 642.50 263386 CITY OF EDINA 5842.5514 R55CKREG LOG20000 YORK SELLING 270.50 263387 561051 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING Council Check Register 28.00 263628 561451 5862.5515 6/9/2011 — 6/9/2011 VERNON SELLING Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,475.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 263244 QB17652 1470.6103 `PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,475.98 347919 619/2011 ' 347918 6/9/2011 119763 HIGH SHINE CO INC 500.00 641.25 TURBO CLEANING 263245 1382 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC ART 641.25 500.00 347917 61912011 100806 HOBART SERVICE 61912011 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 317.14 DISHWASHER REPAIR 00006336 263745 04337940 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 291.52 ACID, TESTING SUPPLIES 317.14 11051735 5620.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH PARK 947918 61912011 291.52 104375 HOHENSTEINS'INC. 6/8/2011 8:08:53 Page - 15 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL GRILL 642.50 263386 561267 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 270.50 263387 561051 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 28.00 263628 561451 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,370.00 263629 561450 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,311.00 347919 619/2011 129201 HOLZMAN, DEAN 500.00 EDINA PUBLIC ART COMMITTEE 263709 053111 4105.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC ART 500.00 347920 61912011 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 291.52 ACID, TESTING SUPPLIES 00002121 263746 11051735 5620.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH PARK 291.52 347921 619/2011 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 413.10 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 263497 053111 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 413.10 347922 619/2011 112628 ICEE COMPANY, THE 1,775.29 CONCESSION PRODUCT 263747 888494 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL- CONCESSIONS 1,775.29 347923 6/9/2011 116191 INSTY- PRINTS i 320.63 CITY CODE SUPPLEMENTS 263498 89020 1120.6575 PRINTING ADMINISTRATION 320.63 347924 61912011 121034 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL OF SHOPP 70.00 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 263499 060111 1190.6105 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 70.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/9/2011 - 6/9/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 347925 6/912011 103193 INTOXIMETERS INC. 100.46 INTOX REPAIRS 263500 333342 2340.6406 5430.6406 5430.6406 1643.6530 1553.6530 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 5842.5514 100.46 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5822.5514 347926 61912011 5822.5514 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5842.5514 66.83 CLUBHOUSE LIGHT FIXTURE 00001081 263246 4331138-02 140.72 LIGHT BULBS 00001081 263247 4331138 -01 207.55 347927 61912011 100386 J.R. JOHNSON SUPPLY INC. 91.07 SHAFT ACTUATOR, REPAIRS 00001043 263248 0053713 -IN 91.07 347928 61912011 102136 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SERVICE 235.81 CHECK VALVE, STROBES 00005081 263579 0017280 235.81 347929 619/2011 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 5,329.35 263388 1561833 5,464.10 263389 1561865 6,067.97 263390 1561864 9.10- 263391 73473 77.85 263630 1561872 15,683.89 263631 1561871 32,614.06 347930 61912011 103384 JOHN DEERE COMPANY 14,855.17 FRONT MOUNT MOWER 00001718 263748 110882111 14,855.17 347931 61912011 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 2,228.28 WEED SPRAY 00001917 263249 57849118 1,697.68 WEED SPRAY 00001922 263250 57877068 3,925.96 347933 6/9/2011 100836 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 3.36 263392 1036315 3,993.21 263393 1062995 1.12 263394 1062980 2,131.70 263395 1064319 99.36 263396 1064248 9,316.43 263397 1062985 5430.6406 5430.6406 1643.6530 1553.6530 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 421650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 1643.6546 1643.6546 5862.5513 5862.5512 5852.5512 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5512 WEED SPRAY WEED SPRAY 6/8/2011 8:08:53 Page - 16 Business Unit DWI FORFEITURE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GENERAL TURF CARE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING PARK MAINT EQUIPMENT GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 6/8/2011 8:08:53 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 17 6/9/2011 -- 619/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit .56 263398 1062979 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2.24 263399 1062986 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,080.66 263400. 1064318 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 404.19 263401 1063956 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 363.00 263402 1063953 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 283.07 263403 1063955 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 75.00- 263404 498180 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2.32- 263405 498115 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 711.55 263632 1067320 5862,5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 67.24 263633 1067305 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6,490.89 263634 1067318 - 5862.5513 COST OF. GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,12 263635 1067301- 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS -SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,822.80 263636 1067319 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,640.34 263637 1067317 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS:'SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 869.7,5 263638 1067321 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,516.89 263639 1067311 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 161.36 263640 1067298 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 295.36 263641 1067310 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,586.65 263642. 1067314 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 630.85 263643 1067315 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING - 2,224.33 263644 1067316 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 492.20 - ` 263645 1067304 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING, 5,337.69 263646 1067308 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 22,11 263647 1067309 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.12 263648 1067300 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,001.37 263649 1067312 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,286.49 263650 1067313 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 662.00 263651 1064667 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10.67- 263652 498393 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 12.00- 263653 498392 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 12.48- 263654. 498395 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.84 263655 498394 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 37.45- 263656 498214 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 51,349.25 347934 6/9/2011 100919, JOHNSON, NAOMI- 2.90 PETTY CASH 263501 053111 5110.6235 POSTAGE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 8.41 PETTY CASH 263501 053111 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 45.75 PETTY CASH 263501 053111 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 57.53 PETTY CASH 263501 053111 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 59.19 PETTY CASH 263501 053111 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/9/2011 - 6/9/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanatlon PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 194.42 PETTY CASH 263501 053111 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DEPT UNIFORMS DEPT UNIFORMS DEPT UNIFORMS DEPT UNIFORMS 6/8/2011 8:08:53 Page - 18 Business Unit ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT CLUB HOUSE TREE REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PSTF FIRE TOWER CONSULTING INSPECTION GLEASON WATER TOWER REHAB AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC ART SAFETY EQUIPMENT POOL ADMINISTRATION 368.20 347935 6/912011 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 91.50 FAN MOTOR 00001970 263251 096357 5420.6530 91.50 347936 61912011 116901 K.C. GROVES TREE EXPERTS 555.10 OAK WILT ASSESSMENT 00001911 263749 051311 4088.6103 555.10 347937 619/2011 111018 KEEPRS INC. 159.98 UNIFORMS 00003542 263252 165020 -01 1470.6558 243.95 UNIFORMS 00003574 263253 165117 1470.6558 116.97 UNIFORMS 00003559 263254 164416 -01 1470.6558 77.98 UNIFORMS 00003542 263255 165020 1470.6558 598.88 347938 6/912011 117792 KIDDE FIRE TRAINERS INC. 154,267.50 FIRE TOWER UPGRADES 00007440 263327 0000007126 7413.6710 154,267.50 347939 61912011 112618 KOLLMER CONSULTANTS INC. 9,990.00 TOWER REHAB INSPECTION 263580 1552 05509.1705.21 9,990.00 347940 61912011 116260 LAW ENFORCEMENT TARGETS INC. 64.13 TARGETS 00003061 263328 0166973 -IN 1400.6551 64.13 347941 619/2011 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 497.89 HOSE, SCREWS, CLAMPS 00005046 263329 0476976 1553.6530 497.89 347942 6/912011 120279 LEGEROS, NICHOLAS 500.00 EDINA PUBLIC ART COMMITTEE 263710 053111 4105.6103 500.00 347943 619/2011 100225 LIFEGUARD STORE INC, THE 606.50 RESCUE EQUIPMENT 263581 INV049782 5310.6610 606.50 REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DEPT UNIFORMS DEPT UNIFORMS DEPT UNIFORMS DEPT UNIFORMS 6/8/2011 8:08:53 Page - 18 Business Unit ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT CLUB HOUSE TREE REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PSTF FIRE TOWER CONSULTING INSPECTION GLEASON WATER TOWER REHAB AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC ART SAFETY EQUIPMENT POOL ADMINISTRATION CITY OF EDINA 6/8/2011 8:08:53 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 19 6/9/2011 -6/9/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 347944 61912011 101314 LITTLE BLIND SPOT; THE 118.00 SHUTTER REPAIR 00006306 263502 SNS21277 5430.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 118.00 347945 6/9/2011 125208 LOVEJOY, NICHOLAS 78.85 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 263503 060111 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 51.10 CELL PHONE REIMBURSEMENT 263750 06061.1 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 129.95 347946 61912011 101792 LUBE -TECH 1,454.38 DIESEL 00006046 263751 1910133 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,318.21 GAS 00006045 263752 1910135 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES. RANGE 785.66 GAS 00006045 263753 1910134 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 3,558.25 347947 61912011 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 67.38 BRAKE PEDAL SPRINGS 00005082 - 263330 2113807 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 175.06 SOLENOID VALVE 00005030 263582 2113876 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 242.44 347948 6/9/2011 105677- MAGC / I 10.00 WORKSHOP - J. GREENLEE 263759 FW11ED 2210.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS COMMUNICATIONS 10.00 347949 61912011 114594 MARTIN; ANTHONY 251.95 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 263544 053111 2310.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS E911 251.95 . 347950 61912011 101146 MATRIX 241.92 263256 607800330 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 241.92 347951 61912011 102197 MCFOA 40.00 MEMBERSHIP -JANE TIMM 263504 060111 1180.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ELECTION 40.00 " MEMBERSHIP - DEB MANGEN 263504 060111 1180.6105 -DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ELECTION 80.00 347952 6/912011 101928 MCKENZIE, THOMAS - 132.66 UNIFORM PURCHASE 263505 053111 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL u 49.87 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 263506 060111 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 182.53 R55CKREG LOG20000 FIELD MAINTENANCE LINE MARKING POWDER CITY OF EDINA EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION Council Check Register 6/9/2011 —6/9/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation Po ft Doc No . Inv No Account No 347953 61912011 101790 MCMAHON, DANIEL 67.32 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 263507 053111 1330.6180 67.32 347964 6/912011 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 2,333.25 MPLS CITY HALL TRIP 263508 053111 1628.6103.07 2,333.25 347955 61912011 113023 MEGGITT TRAINING SYSTEMS INC. 92.79 COUPLINGS 263754 INV- 0050125 7412.6406 92.79 347956 61912011 101457 MEICHSNER, EARL 54.06 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 263509 053111 1652.6107 54.06 347957 61912011 101987 MENARDS 32.01 WEED KILLER 00002070 263510 91525 5630.6540 40.47 LAWN FOOD, CONTAINER 00002074 263511 91726 5630.6406 72.48 347956 61912011 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 544.53 FIELD PAINT 00001918 263257 132486 1642.6544 296.79 FIELD PAINT 00001934 263583 132571 1642.6544 29.75 PLAYGROUND BALLS 263755 132674 4077.6406 702.18 TENNIS BALLS 263755 132674 1623.6406 1,573.25 347959 61912011 100885 METRO SALES INC 1,742.00 COPIER USAGE 263756 410570 1470.6215 1,742.00 347960 6/9/2011 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME 365,307.57 SEWER SERVICE 263584 0000961794 5922.6302 365,307.57 347961 61912011 124204 METSA, PAUL 300.00 TALENT FEE 263258 052711 5410.6103 300.00 347962 619/2011 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 190.14 ASPHALT 00001224 263331 109772MB 1301.6518 6/8/2011 8:08:53 Page - 20 Subledger Account Description Business Unit CONTRACTED REPAIRS TRAFFIC SIGNALS TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE WEED MOWING FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/9/2011 — 6/9/2011 ' I Check # Date Amount Supplier /Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Descnpt on - 637.82 ,ASPHALT 00001224 263332 109593MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP 765.63- ASPHALT 00001224 263333 109439MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP 1,593.59 2,327.50 WATER SERVICE' REPLACEMENT 00001140 263259 33840 5913.6180 347963 6/9/2011 102873 MILLER, SUSAN 2,327.50. 347965 E REIMBURSEMENT 263757 060511 5621 6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CONTRACTED REPAIRS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS WATER PURCHASED " DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 6/8/2011 8:08:53 Page- 21 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION DISTRIBUTION ASSESSING DISTRIBUTION POOL ADMINISTRATION COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 201.71 MILEAG 201.71 347964 61912011 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 2,327.50 WATER SERVICE' REPLACEMENT 00001140 263259 33840 5913.6180 2,327.50. 347965 61912011 101320 MINNEAPOLIS AREA ASSOC OF REAL 111.00 MLS ACCESS FEES 263758 1661581 1190.6105 111.00 347966 61912011 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 15,989.06 431- 0005.300 WATER' 263585 060311 5913.6601 15,989.06 347967 61912011 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 35.00 50265 HOSPITALITY.FEE 263760 414927 5310.6105 35.00 347968 619/2011 100905 MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION 83.00 GHIN SERVICES` • 263512 45- 0150 -21 -5/11 5401.4603 190.00 263513 45- 0150 -13 -5/11_ 5401A603 3,876.00 263514 45- 0150 -16 -5/11 5401.4603 4,149.00 347969 61912011 106908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 236.27 SPRAYER REPAIR PARTS 00001920 263260 0089158 -IN 1643.6530 4.17 PVC SUCTION HOSE 00001919 263261 0089153 -IN 1643.6530 240.44 347970 61912011 100898 MINVALCO 34.23 HONEYWELL.DIAPHRAGM 00001085.263262 798823 5420.6530 34.23 WWI 619/2011 108668 MORRIS, GRAYLYN 175.00 PERFORMANCE 6/16/11 263693 060111 5631.6136 175.00 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS WATER PURCHASED " DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 6/8/2011 8:08:53 Page- 21 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION DISTRIBUTION ASSESSING DISTRIBUTION POOL ADMINISTRATION COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/8/2011 8:08:53 Council Check Register Page - 22 6/9/2011 - 6/9/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 347972 61912011 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 45.57 PUMP FOR BALLFIELDS 00001927 263263 787750 -00 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 189.68 STARTER 00006449 263264 785970 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 244.54 CONTROL 0000644.8 263265 78585400 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 123.98 WHEEL RIM 00006452 263266 787183 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 15.27 HOLDERS 00006442 263267 783888 -01 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 89.86 BLADES 00006451 263268 78712400 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 200.00- REWARD CREDIT 263269 1014827 -99 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 24.07 WASHERS, BOLTS 00001891 263586 785262 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 123.65 IRRIGATION PARTS 00002067 263587 788883 -00 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 103.40 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001063 263588 788012 -00 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 760.02 347973 6/9/2011 103267 NATIONAL GOLF FOUNDATION 100.00 1032214 OPERATING PROFILES 00006310 263515 101172 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 100.00 347974 61912011 129202 NELSON, JUDD 500.00 EDINA PUBLIC ART COMMITTEE 263711 060111 4105.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC ART 500.00 347975 61912011 105968 NHA HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING 1,327.50 WELL CONTROL CHANGES 00006453 263761 19605654 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,590.43 WELL #1 VFD REPAIR 00006456 263762 19605678 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 3,917.93 347976 6/912011 104350 NIKE USA INC. 361.53 MERCHANDISE 263516 933704820 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 361.53 347977 61912011 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY CO. 50.40 DRAWING PADS 00009034 263270 40543901 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 175.88 TUBE PAINTS, PENCILS 00009040 263271 40588600 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 226.28 347978 6/9/2011 116114 OCE 77.06 MAY 2011 MAINTENANCE 263763 987454324 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 77.06 347979 6/9/2011 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 36.47 PAPER 263517 1346781969 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 6/8/2011 8:08:53 Page - 23 Business Unit CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION POOL OPERATION CITY OF EDINA 263406 R55CKREG LOG20000 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING - 529.75 Council Check Register f 619/2011 -6/9/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation- PO # `> Doc No Inv No Account No Sutiledgw - Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 148.20 PRINTER CARTRIDGE 00002066 263589 565557830001: 5631.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES . 184.67 8306835 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 347980 61912011 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 842.41 263409 183.98 ROPE AND CHAIN 00007054 263590 641155 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 183.98 36.25- 263410 947981 619/2011 5862.5513 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS VERNON SELLING • 6/8/2011 8:08:53 Page - 23 Business Unit CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION POOL OPERATION 263406 8306363 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING - 529.75 f 349.00 263407 8306675 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 148.50 263408 8306835 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 842.41 263409 8306672 -1N 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 36.25- 263410 8306291 -CM 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING • 775.48 263657 8306676 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,608.89 347982 6/912011 '125492 PAYPAL INC. 39.95 VSV0002830598 FEE- 263518 11684566 5910.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES GENERAL (BILLING) 39.95 347983 619/2011 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY.. 611.32 263519 67011742 5320.5510 COST OF.GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 709.56 263520 67011750 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 1,320.88 347984 619/2011 122992 PESEK, NICOLE 150.00. UNIFORM PURCHASE 263521 053111 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 150.00 347985 61912011 119935 PET CROSSING a 662.18 9K EXAM 263334 115002 4607.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 662.18 347986 61912011 125978 PETSMART#459 94.36 K9 FOOD 00003063 263336 T- 3502 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 94.36 347987 61912011 119372 PETSMART#463 98.67 K9 SUPPLIES 00003062 263335 T -9166 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 98.67 347988 61912011 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/8/2011 8:08:53 Council Check Register Page - 24 6/9/2011 - 6/9/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 370.72 263411 2074331 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 579.62 263412 2074330 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,582.48 263413 2073730 5842.6512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,149.04 263414 2073736 5662.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1.12 263415 2073728 5622.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,432.32 263416 2073724 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 499.44 263658 2076725 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,057.94 263659 2076728 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 101.88 263660 2076730 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 171.89 263661 2076729 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 147.36 263662 2076724 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 269.97 263663 2076733 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 994.84 263664 2076731 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 75.07 263665 2076732 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 13.33- 263666 345994/8 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 22.66- 263667 3459949 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 12,397.70 347989 61912011 100119 PING 146.24 GOLF CLUB 263272 10592376 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 146.24 347990 61912011 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 280.00 263417 12552 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 280.00 347991 61912011 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 444.76 TIRES 00005970 263337 444893 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 70.00 SCRAP DISPOSAL FEE 00005970 263338 444900 1553.6583 TIRES 8 TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 51.00 ROAD SERVICE 00005970 263591 444906 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 507.61 TIRES 00005027 263592 457730 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,073.37 347992 619/2011 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 605.00 BRM PERMIT #6171002 263339 051711 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 605.00 347993 6/9/2011 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 2,600.00 UTILITY BILLING PERMIT #939 263522 060211 5910.6235 POSTAGE GENERAL (BILLING) 2,600.00 347994 619/2011 127178 PUREPLAY LLC 347996 61912011 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 55.73 952 929 -0297 263340 0297 -5/11 Council Check Register 349.81 952 927 -8861 263341 6/9/2011 -6/9/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation - PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 2,563.28 HANDWHEEL VALVES 00007074 263764 0581. 5311:6406 2,563.28' 347997 61912011 117692 R & B CLEANING INC. 347995 61912011 100971 QUALITY WINE 2,009.25 - 297.06 263593 263418 462917 -00. 5862.5513 270.40 263419 462791 -00, 5862.5513- 466.13 263420 464058 -00 5842.5513 18.60 263421 463870 -CO - 5842.5513 171.20 263422 463869 -00 5842.5513 3,626.75 263423 463956-00 5842.5512 2,518.36 263424 463955 -00 5842.5512 ' 427.00 IRRIGATION' REPAIRS 00001067 263425 464246 -00 5842.5513 1,366.89 358.30 263426 463957 -00 5862.5512 347.92 61912011 263427 464060 -00 5622.5513 800.31 263428 463958 -00 5822.5512 683.70 1307 263429. 463872 -00 5822.5513 199.57- 263430 456437 -00 5822.5513 893.84 263668 464059 -00 5862.5513 3,781.15 263669 463871 -00 5862.5513 76 -67- 263670 457165-00 5862.5513 347996 61912011 123898 QWEST 55.73 952 929 -0297 263340 0297 -5/11 349.81 952 927 -8861 263341 8861 -5111 40.17 952 922 -9246 263342 9246 -5/11 445.71 347997 61912011 117692 R & B CLEANING INC. 2,009.25 CLEAN RAMP STAIRWELLS 00001201 263593 945 2,009.25 347998 619/2011 120036 RAMAKER & ASSOCIATES INC. 3,080.00 STANDING WAVE PROJECT 263594 12714 3,080.00 347999 -61912011 100974 RAYMOND HAEG PLUMBING 358.30 IRRIGATION' REPAIRS 00001067 263595 13042 358.30 348000 61912011 104642 RCM SPECIALTIES INC. 956.96 EMULSION 00005022 263343 1307 4090.6188 1550.6188 1400.6188 4090.6406 Subledger Account Description' GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE . COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST-OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE ` 6/8/2011 8:08:53 Page - 25 Business Unit POOL OPERATION VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING. 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 5300.1715 LAND IMPROVEMENTS 1643.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1314.6519 ROAD OIL AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET GENERAL TURF CARE STREET RENOVATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/8/2011 8:08:53 Council Check Register Page - 26 6/912011 — 6/9/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 956.96 348001 61912011 105324 READY WATT ELECTRIC 17,887.32 SUPPLY & INSTALL SIREN #1 00003169 263523 95683 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 17,887.32 348002 619/2011 125936 REINDERS 352.94 MARKING PAINT 263273 3008860 -00 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,596.74 HERITAGE FUNGICIDE 00006443 263274 3105079-00 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 541.53 HERITAGE FUNGICIDE 263275 1338916-00 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 225.81 HERBICIDE 00006445 263276 3008748-00 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,717.02 348003 61912011 104793 RESTORATION SYSTEMS INC. 422.55 HYDRANT USAGE RENTAL REFUND 263524 052711 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES 422.55 348004 619/2011 119854 RHINO 163.13 POSTS, CABLE DECALS 00001172 263596 39055 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 163.13 348005 61912011 126343 RICHFIELD DQ GRILL AND CHILL 45.98 SHEET CAKES 263765 556 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 45.98 348006 61912011 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 132.77 BRAKE CONTROLS 00005047 263597 1255809-01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 132.77 348007 61912011 117073 RINEHART, THOMAS 318.24 TRAINING MILEAGE 263525 053111 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 318.24 348008 61912011 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 153.85 SOFTENER SALT 00001113 263766 00251918 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 153.85 348009 6/912011 101311 ROOT -0-MATIC SEWER SERVICE 320.00 SEWER REPAIRS AT ARNESON 00001066 263598 32854 1646.6189 SEWER & WATER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 320.00 348010 6/912011 100982 ROTO - ROOTER CITY OF EDINA 618/2011 _ 8:08:53 R55CKREG LOG20000 - Council Check Register Page - 27 6/912011 -6/9/2011 .Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doe No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 720.00 CLEAR SHOWER DRAINS 263599 04816244728 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 720.00 348011 6/912011 101963 S & S TREE SPECIALISTS 1,763.44 INSECT CONTROL 00001062 263600 49843 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,918.41 INSECT CONTROL 00001401 263601 49841 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 2,431.41 WOOD WASTE DISPOSAL 00005539 263602 49844 1644.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL TREES & MAINTENANCE 2,110.78 INSECT,CONTROL 00001064 263603 49842 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 8,224.04 348012 61912011 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 113.07 RECYCLE PARTS WASHER 00005033 263767 924396127 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 113.07 346013 61912011 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 54.65 BAKERY 263526 313453 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 8.42 BAKERY ' 263527 313460 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 63.07 348014 619/2011 101822- SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 16.00 SUPPLIES 263768 007207 1623.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION 43.89 SUPPLIES 263768 007207. 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 211.17 SUPPLIES 263768 007207 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 969.86 SUPPLIES 263769 009564 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 1,240.92 348016 619/2011 124247 SAM'S ROYAL LAWN SERVICE 252.10 WEED CONTROL 00001833 263528 301 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 252.10 348016 61912011 103836 SCHEERER; DANIEL 375.00 PAINT GARAGE DOORS 263770 060211 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 375.00 348017 61912011 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 29.27 FRAMING BOARDS 00001137 263604 40932110 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 29.27 - . 348018 6/912011 129194 SCOTT, RUTH 1,334.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 263771 060111 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,334.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/9/2011 —6/9/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 348019 6/912011 100995 SEH 410.06 RIDGE RD RECON 263277 244072 03461.1705.21 683.44 RIDGE RD RECON 263277 244072 05510.1705.21 4,647.40 RIDGE RD RECON 263277 244072 01384.1705.21 7,927.92 RIDGE RD RECON 263277 244072 04374.1705.21 5,522.05 MINNEHAHA WDS RECON 263278 244073 03460.1705.21 5,863.18 MINNEHAHA WDS RECON 263278 244073 04375.1705.21 11,806.31 MINNEHAHA WDS RECON 263278 244073 05511.1705.21 12,046.15 MINNEHAHA WDS RECON 263278 244073 01334.1705.20 48,906.51 348020 6/9/2011 104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC. 48.16 NAME PLATE 263772 42103 1100.6406 48.16 348021 61912011 100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 481.85 PAINT 00008013 263279 1345 -1 5511.6532 295.49 PAINT 00008015 263280 1453 -3 5511.6532 777.34 348022 6/912011 100629 SMITH, AMY 255.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 263773 060311 5410.6107 255.00 348023 61912011 122368 SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 132,000.00 FIRE TOWER UPGRADE 263774 8551 4509.6710 132,000.00 348024 61912011 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 257.00 263431 1558278 5822.5513 309.50 263432 1489761 5822.5513 3.90- 263433 1538412 5822.5513 37.49 263671 1543663 5842.5515 1,035.50 263672 1558279 5862.5513 3,050.00 263673 1489762 5862.5513 1,743.50 263674 1489763 5842.5513 17.55- 263675 1538413 5842.5513 320.00 263676 1558297 5842.5513 376.00 263677 1539895 5862.5513 7,107.54 348025 6/912011 101462 SPORT HALEY INC. Subledger Account Description CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING DESIGN GENERAL SUPPLIES PAINT PAINT MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 6/8/2011 8:08:53 Page - 28 Business Unit SS-461 RIDGE RD RECONSTRUCTION WM -510 RIDGE RD RECONSTRUCTION RIDGE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION STS -374 RIDGE ROAD MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON BA -334 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON CITY COUNCIL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GOLF ADMINISTRATION PUB SAFETY TRAINING FACILITY 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA 6/8/2011 8:08:53 RSSCKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 29 6/9/2011 - 619/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation. PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledgei,,Account Description Business Unit 1,341.28 MERCHANDISE 263529 PSI= 186419 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS" PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,341.28 348026 61912011 101004 SPS COMPANIES 398.16 PLUMBING PARTS 00001932 263281 S2374218.001 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 398.16 348027 6/912011 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC. 30.46 ANATENNA 00005584 263605 5186554 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 30.46 348028 6/9/2011 101015 STRETCHERS - 2,558.59 AMMO 263344 1839835 1400.6551 AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,558.59 348029 6/912011 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 504.22 VEHICLE REPAIRS. 00005052 263606 592141 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 58.26 ARM REST ASSEMBLY 00005048 263607 319836 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 29.66 HANDLE 00005048 263608 319798 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN i 29.66 CREDIT 263609 CM319798 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 562.48 348030 61912011 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 700.00 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE AD 263530 1319254 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 150.00 EDINA LIQUOR AD 263531 '1319252 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 150.00 EDINA LIQUOR AD 263531 1319252 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 150.00 EDINA LIQUOR AD 263531 1319252 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,150.00 348031 6/912011 102925 SUPERIOR TECH PRODUCTS 369.15 FERTILIZER 263262 3617 -RGR 5422.6540 FERTILIZER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 369.15 348032 6/912011 121492 SUPERIOR TURF SERVICES INC. 777.41 HERBICIDE 00006452 263283 6966 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 777.41 a 348033 6/912011 110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO 13:35 CLIP /CASE 0000/177 263610 30046 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 13.35 348034 61912011 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 618/2011 8:08:53 Council Check Register Page - 30 6/9/2011 -6/9/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 558.00 263678 MVP01729 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 558.00 348035 6/912011 122511 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 675.00 MOVIES IN THE PARK 00002081 263611 DB1571327 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 675.00 348036 619/2011 104932 TAYLOR MADE 315.63 MERCHANDISE 263532 16119922 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 116.20 263533 16128414 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 203.00 263534 16128415 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 63.05 263535 16136051 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 150.00- 263536 CREDIT MEMO 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 547.88 348037 6/912011 113549 TENNIS WEST 2,470.00 FENCEIGATE REPAIRS 00001049 263284 11- 007795 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 4,370.00 CONSTRUCT PRIVACY FENCE 00001048 263285 11- 007797 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 6,840.00 348038 61912011 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 199.20 263286 641104 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 2,247.40 263434 641572 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 446.00 263537 00774952 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 126.60 263775 641857 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 3,019.20 348039 619/2011 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 293.75 DRAFT MINUTES 5117/11 263612 M18424 1100.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY COUNCIL 293.75 348040 61912011 101293 TODD, DARRELL 467.98 SHELVING 263538 053111 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 467.98 348041 61912011 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 173.98 WELDING GAS 00005079 263613 350940 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 173.98 348042 61912011 101042 TRIARCO 122.99 CRAFT SUPPLIES 00009035 263287 277237 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 122.99 CITY OF EDINA 6/8/2011 8:08:53 RSSCKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 31 6/9/2011 - 619/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 348043 619/2011 100682 TRUGREEN - MTKA 5640 507.68 SPRING ROOT FERTILIZE 00001068 263776 017713 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 208.42 SPRING ROOT FERTILIZE 00001069 263777 017710 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 144.29 EARLY SPRING APP 00001070 263778 023485 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 860.39 348044 61912011 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 448.06 WHEEL PARTS 263286 0124436 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 34.73 SWITCH, BOLTS 00005080 263345 TI21316 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 25.92 BOLTS 00005080 263614 T121316A 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,340.36 SPACERS, FILTERS, BLADES 00001515 ,263615 S126049 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,849.07 348045 61912011 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 859.01 SEED 00006070 263289 25080 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 216.42 GRASS SEED 00001924 263290 25118 1643.6547 SEED GENERAL TURF CARE 288.56 GRASS SEED 00001935 263291 25186 1642.6547 SEED FIELD MAINTENANCE 229.78 GRASS SEED 00001044 263616 25235 1643.6547 SEED GENERAL TURF CARE 1,593.77 348046 61912011 122554 VALLEY NATIONAL GASES LLC 76.61 OXYGEN 00003649 263539 820591 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE.DEPT. GENERAL 252.00 263540" 349451 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 328.61 348047 6/912011 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 403.87 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00001921 263292 198628 -00 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 309.45 LIQUOR BAGS 263346 199337 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 510.86 CAN LINERS 00001928 263617 19896400 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LITTER REMOVAL 1,224.18 348048 61912011 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 315.80 SOLENOID, TOP STRUT 00006444 263293 54007 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 1,631.74 ENGINE 06006450 263294 54168 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 315.00 CART RENTALS 00006281. 263295 54241 5423.6216 LEASE LINES GOLF CARS 2,262.54 348049 6/912011 113950 VICTORSEN, JON 132.85 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 263779 6111 FRANCE AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 132.85 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/9/2011 - 6/9/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 348050 6/9/2011 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 44.94 ELECTRICAL PARTS 00001105 263296 5432299 1646.6406 77.92 ELECTRICAL PARTS 00001105 263296 5432299 5630.6406 159.17 ELECTRICAL PARTS 00001187 263347 5443258 5311.6406 282.03 348051 6/9/2011 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 613.86 CLEANING PRODUCTS 263541 30988326 5311.6511 2,911.36 CONCESSION PRODUCT 263541 30988326 5320.5510 52.62 SPONGES 263780 31036100 5311.6511 474.15 CONCESSION PRODUCT 263780 31036100 5320.5510 4,051.99 348052 619/2011 100023 VOGEL, ROBERT C. 2,350.00 CLG GRANT - EDINA WOMEN 263781 211012 1140.6103 2,350.00 348053 61912011 1 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 63.31 BULBS 00001171 263297 15180963 -00 1375.6406 340.92 BULBS 263348 15181360 -00 5311.6406 404.23 348054 61912011 102886 WAGNERS 250.28 SEVIN 00006364 263298 111115 5422.6545 250.28 348055 6/912011 102642 WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS INC 7,068.64 50TH & FRANCE CONCEPT DESIGN 263782 21373200001 1375.6103 3,333.04 DEMAND STUDY UPDATE 263783 21349210001 1375.6103 10,401.68 348056 6/912011 123616 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC 330.60 LEAK LOCATES 00001145 263618 2530 5913.6103 330.60 348067 61912011 101973 WILMOT, SOLVEI 9.18 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 263784 060111 5952.6107 86.70 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 263784 060111 1490.6107 95.88 348058 619/2011 114588 WILSON, ROBERT C. 125.85 SEMINAR EXPENSES 263785 060111 1190.6104 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD CLEANING SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD 6/8/2011 8:08:53 Page - 32 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION POOL CONCESSIONS POOL OPERATION POOL CONCESSIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKING RAMP GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE RECYCLING MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC HEALTH CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 348060 61912011 101312 WINE MERCHANTS VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 VERNON SELLING 263436 363681" 151.28 5842.5513 263680, Council Check Register 3,008.47 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 263681 6/9/2011 - 6/9/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No - Account No 129.03 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 263786 060611 1190.6107 254.88 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 263684 363798 348059 61912011 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 757.20 117482' WINECONNECT INC. 263435 271092 -00 5842.5513 1,730.65 WEB- JUNE 2010 263679 271088 -00 5862.5513 348060 61912011 101312 WINE MERCHANTS VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 546.60 VERNON SELLING 263436 363681" 151.28 5842.5513 263680, 364294 3,008.47 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 263681 364297 638.09 YORK SELLING 263682 364296 401.28 5862.5513 263683 364295 80.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 263684 363798 4,825.72 YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 348061 6/912011 117482' WINECONNECT INC. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 159.24 WEB- JUNE 2010 263542 815 159.24 VERNON SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 348063 6/912011 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,564.47 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 263437 578863 28.10 50TH ST SELLING 263436 579775 ' 591.50 5842.5513 263439 579250 ' 12,576.30 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 263440 577163 4,232.27 YORK SELLING 263441 579780 5,922.60 5862.5513 263442 579777 5,366.72 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 263443 579766 952.12 YORK SELLING 263444 579770 2,454.09 5862.5513 263445 579771 1,413.79 263446 579772 122.20 263447 579773 28.10 263448 579774 97.05- 263449 830574 31.96- 263450 830575 549.93- 263451 832221 112.00- 263452 831857 112.00- 263453 831856 10,025.69 263685 579776 259.83 263686 582310 6,825.21 J 263687 579767 6/8/2011 8:08:53 Page - 33 Subledger, Account Description Business Unit MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF. GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE - VERNON SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING r 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/8/2011 8:08:53 Council Check Register Page - 34 6/9/2011 - 61912011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,415.54 263688 579769 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 52,875.59 348064 61912011 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 241.00 263299 752849 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 107.50 263454 753789 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,393.00 263455 753788 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,980.00 263456 753071 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,615.60 263457 753041 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 804.70 263787 755695 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 9,141.80 348065 6/912011 101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY 30.04 GOLF BALL SOAP 263300 259241 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 30.04 348067 6/912011 101726 XCEL ENERGY 992.41 51- 5634814 -2 263349 283335111 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 672.24 51- 9011854 -4 263350 283068845 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 78.28 51- 9608462 -5 263351 283418400 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 9.95 51- 6050184 -2 263352 283183705 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 201.48 51- 5938955 -6 263353 283523793 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS 159.38 51- 6229265.9 263354 283529606 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 1,918.19 51- 6229265 -9 263354 283529606 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 481.50 51- 6046826 -0 263355 283525048 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 32,237.43 51- 4621797 -2 263356 283317749 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 46.16 51- 6541084 -2 263357 283353223 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 8,313.52 51- 6955679 -8 263358 283357681 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 36.46 51- 8102668 -0 263359 283373478 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 37.70 51- 9422326 -6 263360 283409583 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 139.94 51- 9337452 -8 263361 283396302 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 159.60 51- 8987646 -8 263362 283397974 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 52.42 51- 8976004 -9 263363 283390D74 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 1,938.56 51- 5547446 -1 263364 283333856 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 35.87 51- 6892224 -5 263365 283193425 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 312.14 51- 8324712 -5 263366 283219645 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 81.67 51- 8526048 -8 263367 283216504 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 38.18 51- 8997917 -7 263368 283222040 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 235.35 51- 9251919 -0 263369 283225721 5650.6185 LIGHT & POWER PROMENADE 18.06 51- 9770163 -6 263370 283240232 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 76.80 51- 9770164 -7 263371 283237702 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 8,568.28 51- 9603061 -0 263372 283076399 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING CITY OF EDINA 6/8/2011 8:08:53 RSSCKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 35 6/912011 - —6/.9/2011. Check # Date . Amount Supplier /- Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger• Account Description Business Unit 58.70 51- 4420190 73 263373 282986807 1321.6185 LIGHT &POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 1,146.16 51- 5107681 -4 263374 283012106 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 61.13 51- 6692497 -0 263375 283033189 1460.6185 LIGHT &POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 1,728.90 51- 6223269 -1 263376 283022831 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM .. 4,813.16 51- 4966303 -6 263543 283506189 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER - TRAFFIC SIGNALS 21,535.38 51- 4888627 -1 263788 283856920 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 86,185.00 348068 619/2011 100566 XEROX CORPORATION 168.90 MAY USAGE - PARK & REC 00004322 263301 055175940 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 35.08 MAY USAGE - BLDG /ENG 263302 055175939 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 203.98 348069 61912011 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 16,265.13 UNLEADED GAS 00001200 263619 436321 1553.6581 GASOLINE - EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 16,265.13 348070 6/912011 129203 ZELLER,.DEB 500.00 EDINA PUBLIC ART COMMITTEE 263712 053111 4105.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC ART 500.00 348071 6/9/2011 129208 BENJAMIN FRANKLIN PLUMBING 4,610.00 SEWER LINER REPLACEMENT 00001019 .263790 A76126 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 8,100.00 00001020.263791 A75898 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING, INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 5,600.00 00001689 263792 A76113 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 8,550.00 00001673 263793 A69280 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 8,600.00 00001679 263794 A75513 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 5,250.00 00001678 263795 A75928 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 40,710.00 348072 61912011 127287 ELLINGSON DRAINAGE 4,940.00 SANI SEWER REPLACE_ MENT. 263796 9347 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 4,940.00 348073 6/9/2011 103585 HENNEPIN COUNTY HOUSING DEPART 9,582.17 REHAB LOAN PAYBACK 263821 R -01 -03 2101.4205 FEDERAL AID CDBG REVENUES 9,582.17 348074 61912011 102079 HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC 5,120.00 SEWER LINER REPLACEMENT 00001669 263797 13009 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 2,995.00 00001680"263798 13010 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 2,795.00 00001675 263799 13007 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/8/2011 8:08:53 Council Check Register Page - 36 6/912011 —6/9/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3,845.00 00001688 263800 13008 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 3,295.00 00001687 263801 12997 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 18,050.00 348075 61912011 129215 METRO GENERAL SERVICES INC. 4,760.00 SEWER LINE REPLACEMENT 00001005 263802 19820 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 2,350.00 00001002 263803 19806 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 2,500.00 00001011 263804 19803 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 2,400.00 00001698 263805 19795 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 2,400.00 00001699 263806 19801 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 14,410.00 348076 6/9/2011 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 2,975.00 SEWER LINER REPLACEMENT 00001000 263807 33814 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 4,500.00 00001665 263808 33800 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 7,465.00 00001664 263809 33799 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 4,775.00 00001681 263810 33820 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 6,500.00 00001667 263811 33816 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 3,100.00 00001008 263812 3382 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 4,500.00 00001683 263813 33836 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 3,100.00. 00001701 263814 33833 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 4,655.00 00001015 263815 33831 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 4,625.00 00001690 263816 33826 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 6,675.00 00001006 263817 33825 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 52,870.00 348077 6/9/2011 129214 OUVERSON SEWER AND WATER INC. 3,996.00 SEWER LINER REPLACEMENT 00001682 263818 2525 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 6,400.00 00001692 263819 2527 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 4,396.00 00001674 263820 2526 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 14,792.00 348078 6/9/2011 101726 XCEL ENERGY 253.61 51- 5847121 -5 263822 284044402 5914.6185 LIGHT & POWER TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 253.61 1,445,315.34 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,445,315.34 Total Payments 1,445,315.34 R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 166,696.44 02100 CDBG FUND 9,582.17 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 237.55' 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 352:41 02400 BRAEMAR MEMORIAL FUND 119.06 03100 GENERAL DEBT SERVICE FUND 2,195.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 155,973.59 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 33,694.21 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 12,046A5 05100 ART CENTER FUND 2,107.32 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 1,728.90 - 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 15,471.97 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 41,226.39 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 25,032.02 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 16,033:13 - 05800 LIQUOR FUND 212;264.94 05900 UTILITY FUND 577,066.00 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 15,276.62 05950 RECYCLING FUND 29.18 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 156,182.29 Report Totals 1,445,315.34 F CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 6/912011 - 61912011 6/8/2011 8:10:06 Page- 1 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief. that these claims comply -in -all niateriahrespects with therrequirementsof the City of Edina purcha sing p li ie and procedur ate i } R556KREG LOG20000 50TH ST OCCUPANCY LAUNDRY CITY OF EDINA VERNON OCCUPANCY LAUNDRY GRILL LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Council Check Register CITY HALL GENERAL LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 6/16/2011 - 6/16/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 348079 6116/2011 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 30.60 263934 0620488 5822.5515 81.40 263935 0814512 5862.5515 32.00 263936 576004 5822.5515 36.00 264030 0916344 5822.5515 103.40 264151 576036 5862.5515 100.20 264152 0814574 5862.5515 122.20 264153 0765357 5862.5515 68.80 264154 0916347 5842.5515 66.55 264155 0765360 5842.5515 62.80 264156 0814575 5842.5515 703.95 348080 611612011 129223 ADVENTURE SPECIALTIES LLC 801.56 DIVER TO LOCATE PIPE 00001130 263991 11 -2386 5933.6103 801.56 348081 611612011 100058 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 38,820.60 RECYCLING 264299 2556486 5952.6183 38,820.60 348082 611612011 105638 ALPHABITS BAND 125.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/23/11 264248 061011 5631.6136 125.00 348083 611612011 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES 51.76 263911 053111 5821.6201 57.06 263911 053111 5841.6201 118.60 263911 053111 5861.6201 129.12 263911 053111 5421.6201 202.14 263911 053111 1470.6201 234.83 263911 053111 1551.6201 370.11 263911 053111 1470.6201 1,163.82 348084 6/1612011 100595 ANOKA COUNTY 500.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 264292 061311 1000.2055 500.00 348085 6/16/2011 119976 AP LAWN 564.30 WEED CONTROL 00002090 264096 EDINA -0511 5650.6540 564.30 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 6/15/2011 7:55:02 Page- 1 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PONDS & LAKES RECYCLING CHARGES RECYCLING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION LAUNDRY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY LAUNDRY YORK OCCUPANCY LAUNDRY VERNON OCCUPANCY LAUNDRY GRILL LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET FERTILIZER PROMENADE R55CKREG LOG20000 109.20 CITY OF EDINA 348091 6116/2011 Council Check Register 6/16/2011 -- 6/16/2011 00002078 263823 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 346086 6/1612011 348092 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 119916 BARNES, JILL 1,250.97 FOOD 264097 1573216 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE 1,250.97 220.68 SEASON TICKET REFUND 264261 060711 348087 611612011 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 236.73 135.64 WASHERS, BOLTS, KNOBS 263992 37402 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 135.64 906.50 COMP WATER RESOURSES MGMT 263824 23271072.00 -17 348088 611612011 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 906.50 171.22 COFFEE 264195 420228 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 275.17 COFFEE 264300 420225 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 446.39 479.55 348089 6/16/2011 6/1612011 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 508.83 264196 6/01/11 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 508.83 348090 611612011 124499 BACH, MARCIA 6/15/2011 7:55:02 Page - 2 Business Unit GRILL POOL OPERATION PSTF OCCUPANCY CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 109.20 TENNIS INSTRUCTION 264242 061311 1623.6013 SALARIES TEMP EMPLOYEES TENNIS INSTRUCTION CENTENNIAL LAKES AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES DISTRIBUTION ARENA ICE MAINT 868.90 263937 58590400 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 106.55 263938 58602300 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 109.20 348091 6116/2011 100638 BACHMAN'S 173.14 FOUNTAIN GRASS 00002078 263823 28147 5630.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS 173.14 348092 611612011 119916 BARNES, JILL 16.05 SEASON TICKET REFUND 264261 060711 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE 220.68 SEASON TICKET REFUND 264261 060711 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS 236.73 348093 6116/2011 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 906.50 COMP WATER RESOURSES MGMT 263824 23271072.00 -17 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 906.50 348094 6116/2011 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS INC. 479.55 RINK LINE KITS 00008030 264098 00084192 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 479.55 348095 6/1612011 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION CENTENNIAL LAKES AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES DISTRIBUTION ARENA ICE MAINT 868.90 263937 58590400 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 106.55 263938 58602300 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/15/2011 7:55:02 Council Check Register Page - 3 6/16/2011 - 6/1612011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,858.10 263939 58590300 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 342.15 263940 58590600 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 79.05 263941 58590700 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 12.65 263942 85279700 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 230.14 263943 6064500 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 249.06 263944 85278000 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 6.73 263945 85278100 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 1,044.55 264031 58594100 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 12.00- 264032 58595300 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 73.10 264157 58590800 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,858.98 348096 6/1612011 129208 BENJAMIN FRANKLIN PLUMBING 6,800.00 SEWER LINER REPLACEMENT 00001668 264099 A70438 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 6,800.00 348097 6116/2011 108670 BERNER, JIM 150.00 PERFORMANCE 6/23/11 264249 061011 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 348098 611612011 125139 BERNICK'S WINE 780.00 264158 25781 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 780.00 348099 611612011 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 40.57 PITCHERS 263825 WO- 697899 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 15.70 SHEET PROTECTORS 263827 WO- 696437 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 212.45 OFFICE SUPPLIES 264100 WO- 698582 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 108.63 OFFICE SUPPLIES 264101 OE- 257591 -1 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 73.57 DOCUMENT HOLDERS 264301 W0-699056 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 108.10 LAMPS, BULBS 264302 WO- 699040 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 67.02 OFFICE SUPPLIES 264303 WO- 698919 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 42.74 DOCUMENT HOLDER 264304 WO- 699397 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 688.78 348100 6/1612011 102954 BIG FUN SHOW 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6128111 264252 061011 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 348101 6/16/2011 126268 BLUE COMPACTOR SERVICES 412.54 COMPACTOR RENTAL- JUNE 263912 434 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 412.54 COMPACTOR RENTAL- MAY 263913 414 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/16/2011 — 6/16/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 825.08 348102 611612011 102545 BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD 82.76 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 264265 DALE KAUFMAN 1470.4329 82.76 348103 611612011 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 70.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001437 263993 67974 1552.6406 70.77 348104 611612011 104594 BOBBY & STEVE'S AUTO WORLD 236.01 HAULING SERVICE 00001896 263980 137246 1642.6103 236.01 348105 611612011 119631 BONNER & BORHART LLP 15,451.50 PROSECUTING 264305 52861 1195.6103 14,712.50 264306 53471 1195.6103 30,164.00 348106 611612011 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 1,238.58 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003872 264307 '87243260 1470.6510 1,238.58 348107 611612011 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 809.00 264033 103745 5862.5513, 809.00 348108 6/16/2011 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 60.11 SPRING EYE, HARDWARE 00005050 263828 524481 1553.6530 308.78 SPRING 00005050 263829 524474X1 1553.6530 20.46 SADDLE CAPS 00005055 263830 525321 1553.6530 389.35 348109 6/1612011 125155 BRAUN, MICHAEL 100.00 ABOUT TOWN PHOTO 263831 1062 2210.6123 100.00 348110 6/16/2011 100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY 43.48 CAULK 00007059 264268 12094372 -00 5311.6406 + 43.48 348111 611612011 121118 BRUESKE, JEFF Subledger Account Description AMBULANCE FEES GENERAL SUPPLIES 6/15/2011 7:55:02 Page - 4 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRST AID SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL VERNON SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION CITY OF EDINA 6/15/2011 7:55:02 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 5 6116/2011 - 6/16/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 200.00 PERFORMANCE 6/28/11 264253 051011 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 200.00 348112 6/1612011 100669 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC. 776.93 INFIELD AGLIME 00001931 263832 053111 1642.6542 INFIELD MIXTURE FIELD MAINTENANCE 776.93 348113 611612011 106026 BUREAU OF COLLECTION RECOVERY 200.00 ALARM PAYMENT 264197 060311 1400.4332 FALSE ALARMS - POLICE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 200.00 348114 6116/2011 103244 BURTIS, ROBERT 175.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/30/11 264255 061011 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 175.00 348115 611612011 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 132.00 GOLF CLUB 264102 922508563 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 132.00 348116 6/1612011 100004 CAMCO LUBRICANTS 674.10 COMPRESSOR OIL 00008031 264103 74626 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 674.10 348117 6116/2011 120935 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 5,947.13 LEGAL 264308 2851G -4/11 1195.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES 7,506.72 264309 2851G -3/11 1195.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES 9,020.69 264310 2851G-5/11 1195.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES 22,474.54 348118 6/1612011 127600 CAPITAL MAINTENANCE SERVICES L 273.55 CARPET CLEANING 264198 86666 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 273.55 348119 6116/2011 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 31.40 263946 908708 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 697.65 263947 908709 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 388.45 264034 912038 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 31.40 264035 912037 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5,248.20 264036 912039 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 79.00 264037 00010014 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 6,476.10 R65CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/15/2011 7:55:02 Council Check Register Page - 6 6/16/2011 - 6/16/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 348120 6/1612011 100678 CARLSON PRINTING CO. 541.74 SUMMER CALENDARS 00002082 263833 00099010 5631.6575 PRINTING CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 541.74 348121 6116/2011 102064 CASH REGISTER SALES & SERVICE 98.00 CREDIT CARD PAPER 263914 060611 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL ADMINISTRATION 135.00 PROGRAM REGISTER 263994 052711 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL ADMINISTRATION 80.00 PROGRAM CHANGES 263995 050611 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL ADMINISTRATION 98.00 CREDIT CARD PAPER 263996 053111 5310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION 411.00 348122 6116/2011 129237 CHEN, KENRIC 4.07 SEASON TICKET REFUND 264262 060611 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 55.93 SEASON TICKET REFUND 264262 060611 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 60.00 348123 611612011 102519 CHIEF'S TOWING INC 400.60 MOVED DISABLED VEHICLE 00005158 264104 565221 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 400.60 348124 6/16/2011 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 288.81 263948 447097 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 288.81 348125 6/1612011 122317 CITY OF EDINA - COMMUNICATIONS 20.00 STATE OF COMMUNITY 264269 COM1001 1260.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ENGINEERING GENERAL 20.00 348126 6/16/2011 120747 CMS 390.00 DRUG TESTING 263834 052011532294 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 390.00 348127 6116/2011 100088 COLE INFORMATION SERVICES INC. 433.95 SUBSCRIPTION 264199 0573520 -IN 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 433.95 348128 611612011 120433 COMCAST 82.60 8772 10 614 0164959 264105 164959 -5/11 5430.6188 TELEPHONE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 1.53 8772 10 614 0023973 264106 23973 -6/11 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 2.98 8772 10 614 0023973 264106 23973 -6/11 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 87.11 R55CKREG LOG20000 ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS CITY OF EDINA CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING Council Check Register 6/16/2011 - 6/16/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 348129 6116/2011 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 2,709.25 ASPHALT 00001837 264311 053111 1301.6518 2,709.25 348130 6116/2011 124331 COMMERCIAL MAINTENANCE CHEMICA 549.60 DEGREASER 00001990 263997 41860 5923.6406 549.60 348131 611612011 101704 COOK, BARBARA 470.40 PROGRAM SERVICES 264270 11 -1571 1629.6103 470.40 348132 6/1612011 100697 COOL AIR MECHANICAL INC. 713.12 EXHAUST FAN REPAIR 00008047 264107 74497 5511.6180 1,665.40 AIR HANDLER REPAIR 00008046 264108 74498 5511.6180 238.50 DEHUMIDIFIER REPAIR 00008045 264109 74590 5511.6180 14,703.09 R -22 REFRIGERANT REFILL 00008041 264334 74436 5521.6180 17,540.11 348133 6116/2011 101915 COUNTRY FLAGS 132.88 CITY FLAGS 264200 5431 5420.6406 664.40 CITY FLAGS 264200 5431 5630.6406 797.30 CITY FLAGS 264200 5431 1551.6406 1,594.58 348134 6/1612011 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 100.48 114 - 09855685 -4 264201 1411834 7411.6406 100.48 348135 611612011 104020 DALCO 73.74 LIQUID CLEANSER 00009037 263998 2335568 5111.6511 442.94 CLEANING SUPPLIES 264110 2339898 5421.6511 516.68 348136 6/1612011 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 89.60 264038 603770 5842.5515 4,162.05 264039 603771 5842.5514 2,700.35 264040 603768 5862.5514 66.30 264041 603767 5862.5515 614.30 264042 603769 5822.5514 7,632.60 Subledger Account Description BLACKTOP GENERAL SUPPLIES 6115/2011 7:55:02 Page - 7 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE COLLECTION SYSTEMS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY CLEANING SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/15/2011 7:55:02 Council Check Register Page - 8 6/16/2011 - 6/16/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 348137 6/16/2011 122135 DENFELD, SCOTT 98.66 PROPS /LUNCH REIMBURSEMENT 263835 060611 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 31.00 COYOTE STOCK FOOTAGE 263836 060711 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 129.66 348138 6/1612011 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 76.14 BAKERY 264111 371169 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 98.30 264112 371159 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 72.77 264113 371320 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 80.73 264114 371511 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 327.94 348139 6/16/2011 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 131.40 110311867 264202 110311867 -5/11 5621.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 131.40 348140 6116/2011 100571 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS 679.24 PAINT 00001079 263999 802129313 1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 5,702.96 PAINT 00001087 264000 802129420 1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 6,382.20 348141 611612011 123162 DISH NETWORK 54.53 264203 060411 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 54.53 348142 6/16/2011 106340 EDINA CAR WASH 90.11 MAY2011 CAR WASHES 264293 4667 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 90.11 348143 6/1612011 101656 EDINA CHORALE 100.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/20/11 264244 061011 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 100.00 348144 6/16/2011 105467 EDINA CRIME PREVENTION FUND 4,905.00 CREDIT CARD RECEIPTS ART FAIR 264312 061311 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 4,905.00 348145 6/1612011 101956 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC 4,414.88 T -90 REPAIRS 264204 55280 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 4,414.88 348146 6/1612011 127590 ETTERMAN ENTERPRISES CITY OF EDINA 6/15/2011 7:55:02 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 6116/2011 — 6/16/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 300.66 BUTT CONNECTORS, FUSE HOLDERS005087 263837 171279 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 300.66 348147 6/16/2011 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 6,437.50 MAY BILLINGS 263838 060611 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 6,437.50 348148 611612011 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 201.00 263949 W- 375777 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 201.00 348149 6/16/2011 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 7.37 BULBS 00005969 264001 2- 2982421 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 94.84 BATTERY 00005026 264115 69- 039462 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 55.00- CREDIT 264205 1- 3605842 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 47.21 348150 6116/2011 102101 FEDEX OFFICE 589.46 MERCHANDISING SIGNS 00006364 264116 131200004041 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 589.46 348151 611612011 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 450.41 CS PARTS, MARKING STICKS 00001144 264002 S01307164.001 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 450.41 348152 611612011 116189 FILTRATION SYSTEMS INC. 3,540.49 FILTERS FOR RANGES 264206 41510 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 3,540.49 348163 6/1612011 122683 FIRE SAFETY USA INC. 541.50 JUNCTION BOX 00005090 264003 45008 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 541.50 348154 6/1612011 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. 425.00 ROWAY 263839 21766 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 425.00 348155 611612011 101512 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPANY 626.66 PROOFER ASSEMBLIES 00001150 264004 14308 5920.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SEWER CLEANING 626.66 348156 6/1612011 101567 FMAM R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/15/2011 7:55:02 Council Check Register Page - 10 6/16/2011 -- 6/16/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 105.00 DUES 264207 061011 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 105.00 348157 6116/2011 101557 FMAM 125.00 SEMINAR FEE 264208 6/10/11 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 125.00 348158 611612011 122414 FORKLIFTS OF MINNESOTA INC. 221.98 STARTER 00005057 264117 01/32061450 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 221.98 348159 6116/2011 100764 G & K SERVICES 110.03 264313 053111 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 112.77 264313 053111 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 121.25 264313 053111 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 172.57 264313 053111 5511.6201 LAUNDRY ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 218.54 264313 053111 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 248.50 264313 053111 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 359.30 264313 053111 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,342.96 348160 611612011 119567 GARELICK STEEL CO INC 235.13 ALUM TREAD BRITE 00005054 264005 205110 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 235.13 348161 6116/2011 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY • MINNEA 59.84 264118 053111 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 81.77 264118 053111 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 101.28 264118 053111 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 405.03 264118 053111 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 647.92 348162 6/1612011 103185 GERTENS 148.29 PLANTINGS 00001061 263981 224447 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 103.67 PLANTINGS 00001237 263982 224671 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 251.96 348163 6/1612011 118941 GLOBALSTAR USA 29.15 R -91 PHONE 264314 3034701 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 29.15 348164 611612011 101103 GRAINGER R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 7.48 WHITE PAINT 1.07 WHITE PAINT 2.14 WHITE PAINT 5.34 WHITE PAINT 6.41 WHITE PAINT 25.78 TIE DOWNS 397.70 FIRST AID KITS 30.59 PAINT 461.18 WIRE, CRIMPING TOOLS 192.65 GLOVES, EAR PLUGS 10.17 BATTERIES 113.03 FACESHIELDS 34.06- CREDIT 1,219.48 9547089806 348165 6/1612011 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 98.25 9547089780 263950 128493 5822.5513 263951 126495 5842.5513 348166 6/1612011 CITY OF EDINA EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL Council Check Register EQUIPMENT RENTAL 150.00 6/16/2011 - 6/16/2011 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 00006075 263840 9547089764 5422.6406 00006075 263841 9547089772 5422.6406 00006075 263842 9547089798 5422.6406 00006075 263843 9547089806 5422.6406 00006075 263844 9547089780 5422.6406 00006075 263845 9547826314 5422.6406 00001173 264006 9545618044 1301.6556 00001166 264007 9546582272 1322.6406 00001147 264008 9552613334 5921.6406 00005028 264009 9551504542 1553.6610 00005026 264010 9551690275 1553.6406 00005053 264011 9550876958 1553.6610 00001166 264012 9546255747 1322.6406 263950 128493 5822.5513 263951 126495 5842.5513 348166 6/1612011 ASSESSING 106431 HALL, MARY EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/21/11 264246 061011 150.00 348167 6116/2011 129207 HARLEY CONSULTING & COACHING 882.00 CONSULTING 263846 3445 882.00 348168 6116/2011 126270 HARTFORD -PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 3,093.42 PREMIUM 264276 5406554 -5 3,093.42 348169 611612011 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 160.31 TECHNICAL SUPPORT 263915 110562023 1,274.96 RADIO ADMIN FEE 264209 110538115 2,348.95 RADIO ADMIN FEE 264210 110538116 32.00 RADIO ADMIN FEE - PUB HEALTH 264294 110538213 3,816.22 348170 6/1612011 103838 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 150.00 EMT REFRESHER 264315 00232412 150.00 5631.6136 1120.6103 9900.2033.16 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES 6/15/2011 7:55:02 Page - 11 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL MAINTENANCE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1460.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CIVILIAN DEFENSE 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 100.00 CITY OF EDINA 348176 Council Check Register 108692 HUGHES, MICHAEL 6/16/2011 - 6/16/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 348171 6/1612011 525.78 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 89.78 VIDEO CARD 00004332 264211 49517709 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 89.78 448.88 348172 6/1612011 7692 103753 HILLYARD INC -MINNEAPOLIS SOD & BLACK DIRT 448.88 368.36 CLEANERS 00002133 264212 6770856 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 348178 368.36 128368 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 348173 6/1612011 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 55.63 OFFICE SUPPLIES 6/15/2011 7:55:02 Page - 12 Business Unit FINANCE EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,648.75 264043 562183 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,648.75 348174 6/1612011 101632 HOLIDAY 58.66 1400 -003- 772 -977 264316 201434141093 1470.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 58.66 348176 6/16/2011 100267 HOPKINS WESTWIND CONCERT BAND 100.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6119/11 264243 061011 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIELD MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING CITY HALL GENERAL 50TH STREET GENERAL INSPECTIONS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 348176 6116/2011 108692 HUGHES, MICHAEL 525.78 REIMBURSE COURSE FEES 264317 060611 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 525.78 348177 6/16/2011 102201 INDEPENDENT BLACK DIRT CO INC 448.88 MOUND CLAY 00001930 263847 7692 1642.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 448.88 348178 6/1612011 128368 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 55.63 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001202 264013 IN- 000048406 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 59.79 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001202 264013 IN- 000048406 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 115.42 348179 611612011 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 12.37 264277 052511 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 12.81 264277 052511 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 14.17 264277 052511 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 17.07 264277 052511 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20.50 264277 052511 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 47.00 264277 052511 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 73.29 264277 052511 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIELD MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING CITY HALL GENERAL 50TH STREET GENERAL INSPECTIONS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 6/1512011 7:55:02 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 13 6/1612011 - 6/16/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 75.10 264277 052511 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 82.25 264277 052511 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 83.42 264277 052511 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 102.27 264277 052511 5431.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 117.67 264277 052511 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 132.03 264277 052511 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 143.62 264277 052511 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 187.20 264277 052511 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 418.86 264277 052511 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 676.51 264277 052511 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,172.04 264277 052511 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH&FRANCE MAINTENANCE 3,388.18 348180 611612011 102136 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SERVICE 22.49 LAMP ADAPTERS 00005156 264014 0017345 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 22.49 348181 611612011 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 84.00 263952 1561881 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 17.55 264044 1561904 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,063.85 264045 1561903 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 11,126.30 264046 1561901 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 38.80 264047 1561902 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 179.00 264119 1567242 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 10,129.13 264159 1561914 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 22,638.63 348182 6116/2011 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 422.64 WEED SPRAY 00001040 263983 57988249 1643.6546 WEED SPRAY GENERAL TURF CARE 422.64 348184 6116/2011 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 111.18 263953 1067767 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 783.48 263954 1067303 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 491.58 263955 1067302 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 541.88 263956 1067299 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,309.82 263957 1067297 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 902.00 263958 1067296 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 22.20- 263959 498391 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 18.92- 264048 498697 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 79.98- 264049 498578 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 53.32- 264050 498579 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/15/2011 7:55:02 Council Check Register Page - 14 6/1612011 - 6/16/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,650.49 264160 1071794 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 66.74 264161 1071B02 5662.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 310.86 264162 1071805 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,787.64 264163 1071801 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 29.12 264164 1071807 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,904.72 264165 1071803 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,718.61 264166 1071806 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,466.58 264167 1071800 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,112.04 264168 1071787 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 387.32 264169 1071785 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,382.00 264170 1071788 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 955.40 264171 1071789 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 41.12 264172 1071790 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 293.76 264173 1071797 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 35.37 264174 1071796 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 7,208.64 264175 1071795 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,326.06 264176 1071798 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 66.33 264177 1071799 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 36,708.32 348185 611612011 118336 JONES AND BARTLETT LEARNING LL 1,297.72 LIFEGUARD BOOKS 264318 2313476 5310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION 1,297.72 348186 6/16/2011 104369 KARKHOFF, NANCY 31.90 UNIFORM PURCHASE 264295 061311 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 31.90 348187 6/16/2011 129234 KERSTEN, MICHELLE 6.18 SEASON TICKET REFUND 264258 060811 5300.2039 SALES 8 USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 85.00 SEASON TICKET REFUND 264258 060811 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 91.18 348188 611612011 129233 KOLLES, TOM 15.39 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 264257 3709 FULLER ST 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 15.39 348189 6/1612011 118635 KREITZER, MARK 150.00 PERFORMANCE 6/30/11 264256 061011 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 348190 6/16/2011 100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS CITY OF EDINA 6/1512011 7:55:02 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 15 6/1612011 - 6/16/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 566.14 . UNIFORMS 264213 10260135 5620.6201 LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH PARK 566.14 348191 6116/2011 122700 LARSON, DAN 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/27/11 264251 061011 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 348192 611612011 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 363.20 BITS, CLAMPS, FITTINGS 00005049 264015 0502105 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 363.20 348193 611612011 100854 LEITNER COMPANY 1,562.84 SAND 263848 BRAEMAR -6/11 5422.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,175.18 SAND 263849 060111 - RICHARDS 5431.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 252.87 TOPSOIL 263850 204656 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 413.18 TOPSOIL 263851 204642 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 3,404.07 348194 611612011 100225 LIFEGUARD STORE INC, THE 67.50 MEGAPHONES 264296 INVO52099 5310.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POOL ADMINISTRATION 67.50 348195 6116/2011 100858 LOGIS 1,202.00 264271 33615 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,535.00 264271 33615 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING ADMINISTRATION 3,079.00 264271 33615 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 3,126.00 264271 33615 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 5,193.00 264271 33615 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING GENERAL (BILLING) 5,215.00 264271 33615 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 5,942.00 264271 33615 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 1,202.00 264319 33726 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,535.00 264319 33726 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING ADMINISTRATION 3,079.00 264319 33726 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 3,126.00 264319 33726 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 5,193.00 264319 33726 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING GENERAL (BILLING) 5,215.00 264319 33726 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 5,942.00 264319 33726 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 52,584.00 348196 611612011 112677 M. AMUNDSON LLP 708.09 263960 110092 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,374.09 264178 110447 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/16/2011 — 6116/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS MEETING EXPENSE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE REPAIR PARTS 6/15/2011 7:55:02 Page - 16 Business Unit ASSESSING ASSESSING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PSTF RANGE LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,082.18 BUILDING MAINTENANCE LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 348197 611612011 101165 M.A.A.O. 430.00 MASS APPRAISAL BASICS 263978 060811 1190.6104 430.00 348198 6116/2011 129222 MAAO REGION 9 105.00 JOINT REGION I & IX MEETING 263979 060811 1190.6106 105.00 348199 6116/2011 101371 MACHOLDA, ED 146.37 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 263916 060711 1600.6107 146.37 348200 6/1612011 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 289.00 PRESSURE SWITCH 00005082 264214 2113809 1553.6530 289.00 348201 6/1612011 124447 MCCULLOUGH, SCOTT 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/29/11 264254 061011 5631.6136 150.00 348202 6116/2011 126839 MCDONALD, LILLIAN 500.00 HOSTING FEE 263852 060611 2210.6103 500.00 348203 6/16/2011 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 1,213.25 ORCHESTRA HALL TRIP 264120 060211 1628.6103.07 1,213.25 348204 6/16/2011 113023 MEGGITT TRAINING SYSTEMS INC. 5,338.41 SHOOTING RANGE EQUIPMENT 264215 INV- 0050331 7412.6710 5,338.41 348205 611612011 101483 MENARDS 56.60 LUMBER, TOOLS 00001054 263984 78752 1646.6577 156.75 RE -BAR, TOOL BELT, EDGING 00001933 263985 73656 1646.6406 36.69 LUMBER 00001074 263986 79599 1646.6577 76.71 PAINTING SUPPLIES 00008040 264121 78096 5511.6406 612.70 MOWER, WEED WHIP, LUMBER 00002089 264122 77766 5630.6406 939.45 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS MEETING EXPENSE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE REPAIR PARTS 6/15/2011 7:55:02 Page - 16 Business Unit ASSESSING ASSESSING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PSTF RANGE LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES CITY OF EDINA 6/15/2011 7:55:02 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 17 6/16/2011 - 6/16/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 348206 6/16/2011 101987 MENARDS 53.41 SAW BLADE, CONCRETE 00002088 264216 77497 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 88.73 CLAMPS, PAINT, WEED KILLER 00002088 264217 75688 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 77.81 CEMENT, TUBS 00002138 264218 95552 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 135.02 SOIL, CEMENT, SEED 00002137 264219 95518 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 25.86 TOP SOIL 00002141 264220 95897 5620.6540 FERTILIZER EDINBOROUGH PARK 380.83 348207 611612011 129215 METRO GENERAL SERVICES INC. 2,600.00 SEWER LINER REPLACEMENT 00001026 264123 19813 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 2,600.00 348208 611612011 100885 METRO SALES INC 143.21 MONTHLY RENTAL 264016 409572 5110.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 143.21 348209 6/16/2011 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAI 175.52 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005157 264124 187576 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 100.00- CREDIT 264125 CM475268 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 75.52 348210 611612011 124204 METSA, PAUL 300.00 TALENT FEE 6/8/11 264221 060711 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 300.00 348211 6/1612011 104650 MICRO CENTER 42.74 WIRELESS MOUSE 00004334 264222 3335508 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE 91.87 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 00003060 264272 3336741 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 134.61 348212 6116/2011 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 746.32 ASPHALT 00001224 264320 110000MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 621.73 264321 110001MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 487.84 264322 1009976MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 681.86 264323 110192MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 2,537.75 348213 6/1612011 129231 MILLER, JOANN 137.14 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 264223 061011 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION 291.72 EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT 264223 061011 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 428.86 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6116/2011 — 6/16/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 348214 6/16/2011 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 980.00 LOCATE AND VIEW LEAK 00001151 264017 33852 5913.6180 4,050.00 SEWER LINER REPLACEMENT 00001037 264126 33837 03460.1705.2 5,030.00 348215 6116/2011 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 21.95 CO25 264127 R105110110 5421.6406 49.03 CO2, METHANE TANKS 264224 R105110222 7413.6545 70.98 348216 6116/2011 102222 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSP 58.92 TRAFFIC CONTROL FIELD MANUALS0001992 264018 -MANUALS 1281.6579 58.92 348217 611612011 101952 MINNESOTAIWISCONSIN PLAYGROUND 501.24 SAFETY SURFACE 263853 2011113 5311.6406 501.24 348218 611612011 100898 MINVALCO 706.51 REFRIGERANT 264128 802115 1551.6406 706.51 348219 6/16/2011 123850 MN FIAM BOOK SALES 1,549.69 TECHNICAL RESCUE BOOKS 00003567 264324 1194 1470.6104 1,549.69 348220 611612011 126724 MN TACTICAL OFFICERS ASSN 2,520.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 263917 060711 1400.6104 2,520.00 348221 6116/2011 122019 MOORE CREATIVE TALENT 345.00 ACTOR FOR COMMERCIAL 264129 131370 2210.6103 345.00 348222 611612011 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 556.09 CONTROL 00005093 264019 493367F6W 1553.6530 556.09 348223 611612011 100912 MOTOROLA INC. 1,635.12 SERVICE AGREEMENT 263918 78171378 1400.6230 1,635.12 6/15/2011 7:55:02 Page - 18 Subledger Account Description Business Unit CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL CHEMICALS PSTF FIRE TOWER TRAINING AIDS TRAINING GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/16/2011 - 6/16/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 348224 6/16/2011 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 61.27 SWITCH 00006462 263854 789160 -00 5422.6530 345.60 HYDRAULIC MOTOR 00006458 263855 788740 -00 5422.6530 164.56 TIRES 00006457 263856 788128 -00 5422.6530 94.13 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001063 263987 790294 -00 1642.6530 61.01 IRRIGATION PARTS 00002084 264130 790887 -00 5630.6530 726.57 348225 6116/2011 129224 MULBERRY BUILDERS 9,980.00 BUILD PRESS BOX 00008043 264131 1048 5500.1705 9,980.00 348226 6116/2011 117034 NAPC 80.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 263919 2011 1140.6105 60.00 348227 6/1612011 103007 NELSON, DAVID 88.00 TRAINING EXPENSES 264132 060311 1400.6107 88.00 348228 611612011 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 742.50 264051 66783 5862.5513 742.50 348229 611612011 100927 NORTHERN AIRE POOLS INC 194.63 SAFETY ROPE 264273 51448 5311.6406 194.63 348230 6116/2011 102652 NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP. 424.91 ASPHALT REMOVER, CLEANERS 00001274 264325 5038404 1301.6406 424.91 348231 6/16/2011 125184 NORTHSTAR MEDIA SERVICES LLC 154.97 TRAFFIC SAFETY NEWS CLIPS 263857 6908 1400.6406 154.97 348232 6/16/2011 105007 NU- TELECOM 557.72 JUNE SERVICE 263858 80447557 1400.6230 557.72 348233 6/16/2011 105901 OERTEL ARCHITECTS 20,725.58 CONSULTING SERVICES 263859 #15 4402.1705.24 Subledger Account Description REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS CONSTR. IN PROGRESS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 6/15/2011 7:55:02 Page - 19 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS FIELD MAINTENANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET PLANNING MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT PW BUILDING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/16/2011 - 6/16/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5422.6406 5913.6406 1644.6107 5842.5513 5842.5515 5862.5513 5822.5515 5421.5510 5421.5510 1643.6103 1647.6103 5822.5513 5822.5512 5822.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5822.5513 5622.5512 5822.5513 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 6/15/2011 7:55:02 Page - 20 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH ST SELLING GRILL GRILL GENERAL TURF CARE PATHS & HARD SURFACE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 20,725.58 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 348234 6116/2011 VERNON SELLING 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 38.10 OIL 00006461 263860 641127 88.39 HOOK 00001148 264225 641930 126.49 348235 6/16/2011 124519 OVERHOLT, JAMES 186.66 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 264278 060911 186.66 348236 611612011 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1,721.01 264052 8307568 -IN 33.25 264053 8307571 -IN 955.01 264054 8307570 -IN 2,709.27 348237 6/16/2011 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 107.72 263961 70120179 1,068.74 264133 67011785 81.00- 264134 67011616 1,095.46 348238 611612011 100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS 1,020.00 GRADE AND SEED AREAS FOR TRE®01076 263861 118 3,775.00 REMOVE AND SET BRIDGE 00001869 264279 119 4,795.00 348239 6116/2011 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 71.59 263962 2076727 77.82 263963 2076726 1,050.21 263964 2076723 826.16 264179 2079858 2,149.07 264180 2079867 1,018.38 264181 2079859 1,217.14 264182 2079865 920.99 264183 2079857 290.48 264184 2079860 196.71 264185 2079861 7,818.55 348240 611612011 129236 PLATT, MARK 5422.6406 5913.6406 1644.6107 5842.5513 5842.5515 5862.5513 5822.5515 5421.5510 5421.5510 1643.6103 1647.6103 5822.5513 5822.5512 5822.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5822.5513 5622.5512 5822.5513 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 6/15/2011 7:55:02 Page - 20 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH ST SELLING GRILL GRILL GENERAL TURF CARE PATHS & HARD SURFACE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING CITY OF EDINA 611512011 7:55:02 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 21 6/1612011 - 611612011 Check # Date Amount Supplier 1 Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 170.13 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 264260 4527 CASCO AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 170.13 348241 6116/2011 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 46.30 PEST CONTROL 264226 2368006 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 46.30 348242 611612011 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 1,256.37 TIRES, MOUNT & DISMOUNT 00005970 264020 451507 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 398.77 TIRE, MOUNT & DISMOUNT 00005027 264021 460863 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,655.14 348243 611612011 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 300.00 NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 263862 060711 1628.6235 POSTAGE SENIOR CITIZENS 300.00 348244 6116/2011 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 190.00 BRM PERMIT #6171000 264274 RENEWAL 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 190.00 348245 6116/2011 100964 PRECISION TURF & CHEMICAL 2,129.00 HERITAGE 263863 36512 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,129.00 348246 611612011 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 108.00 BLADE SHARPENING 00008044 264135 253866 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 108.00 348247 611612011 129232 PROFESSIONAL DRAIN SERVICES IN 807.50 TV LATERALS 00001152 264227 3311 5923.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 807.50 348248 6116/2011 100971 QUALITY WINE 1,167.77 264055 466866 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 61.60 264056 466929 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 419.61 264057 467013 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 722.41 264058 467009 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 210.40 264059 467079 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 18.60 264060 467010 -CO 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 345.60 264061 466864 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,266.82 264062 466876 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 18.60 264063 467012 -CO 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/15/2011 7:55:02 Council Check Register Page - 22 6/16/2011 - 6/16/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 772.51 264064 467011 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,138.51 264065 467038 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,105.03 264066 466865 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 9,247.46 348249 611612011 123898 QWEST 526.69 612 E24 -8657 263920 8657 -6111 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 295.82 612 E24 -8656 263921 8656 -6/11 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 606.52 612 E12 -6797 263922 6797 -6 /11 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 606.52 612 E01 -0426 263923 0426 -6/11 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 57.73 952 926 -0092 263924 0092 -6/11 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 121.90 952 926 -0419 263925 0419 -6/11 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 55.95 263926 0146 -5/11 5911.6188 TELEPHONE WELL PUMPS 58.65 263926 0146 -5/11 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 117.38 263926 0146 -5111 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 120.59 263926 0146 -5/11 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 140.01 263926 0146 -5/11 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 166.13 263926 0146 -5/11 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 228.53 263926 0146 -5/11 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 235.01 263926 0146 -5/11 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 266.68 263926 0146 -5/11 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 2,061.84 263926 0146 -5/11 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 526.14 612 E01 -8392 264022 8392 -6/11 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 104.80 GV 911 FUINDS 264136 0652 -6/11 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES E911 6,296.89 348260 6116/2011 100974 RAYMOND HAEG PLUMBING 957.55 REPIPE FOUNTAIN 00001073 263864 13078 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 434.20 REPAIR WATER PIPE LEAK 264023 13062 5111.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 1,391.75 348251 611612011 104642 RCM SPECIALTIES INC. 982.82 EMULSION 00001231 264326 1326 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 850.92 EMULSION 00001231 264327 13333 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,833.74 348252 6/1612011 126343 RICHFIELD DQ GRILL AND CHILL 131.10 DILLY BARS 264228 557 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 131.10 348253 6/1612011 108659 RICHTER, BRIAN 100.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/22/11 264247 061011 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION CITY OF EDINA 6/1512011 7:55:02 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 23 6/16/2011 - 6/16/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 100.00 348254 6/16/2011 101979 ROFIDAL, KEVIN 55.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 264297 061311 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 55.00 348255 6/16/2011 129239 ROYCE, DAVID 162.50 ART WORK SOLD 264264 061111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 162.50 348256 6116/2011 129238 RUSINAK, JOANN 15.00 CLASS OVERPAYMENT REFUND 264263 060611 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 15.00 348257 6116/2011 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 258.72 RECYCLE PARTS WASHER 00005159 264328 54085748 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 258.72 348258 6/16/2011 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 428.03 101 "'• "'9350 264229 GRILL 421553.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQ OPER CENTRAL SERV EQUIPMENT 11.00 101 "'• "'9350 264241 060911 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 26.39 101" ""'9350 264241 060911 1623.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION 465.42 348259 611612011 124114 SCNS SPORTS FOODS 56.40 FOOD 264137 37216 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 56.40 348260 6116/2011 100349 SCOTT COUNTY 535.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 264298 061311 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 535.00 348261 6116/2011 103249 SHANNON, JIM 140.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/21111 264245 061011 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 140.00 348262 6116/2011 100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 162.02 PAINT 00008029 264138 3559 -1 5511.6532 PAINT ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 162.02 348263 611612011 103237 SHIRLEY, TOM 110.77 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 264230 060611 5631.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION R66CKREG LOG20000 263965 1546005 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 623.00 264067 1489779 Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 917.50 264068 1558332 6/16/2011 - 6/16/2011 VERNON SELLING Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 264186 110.77 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 247.50 348264 611612011 5822.5513 120458 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC. 50TH ST SELLING 2,646.25 586.87 WATER SOFTENER REPAIR 00008027 264139 900192435 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 586.87 340.00 KEYS 264140 111284 348265 6/1612011 POLICE EQUIPMENT 105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 456.99 ALARM MONITORING 264231 74384954 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 13.69 456.99 264141 52379440.001 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 348266 6/1612011 101000 SIR SPEEDY 348272 611612011 103658 ST. LOUIS PARK COMMUNITY BAND 42.75 BUSINESS CARDS 263865 69077 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 42.75 348267 6/16/2011 125991 SLETTERDAHL, WINSTON 86.31 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 264267 060911 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 86.31 348268 6116/2011 129235 SMITH, JEFF 114.00 EXPLORERS PROGRAM REFUND 264259 060811 1600.4390.29 HIGHLANDS EXPLORERS 114.00 348269 6116/2011 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 6/15/2011 7:55:02 Page - 24 Business Unit ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 289.50 263965 1546005 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 623.00 264067 1489779 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 917.50 264068 1558332 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 320.90 264069 1547664 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 247.85 264186 1547662 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 247.50 264187 1548099 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,646.25 348270 611612011 100181 SPEEDY KEYS 340.00 KEYS 264140 111284 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 340.00 348271 6/1612011 101004 SPS COMPANIES 13.69 COVERS 00001214 264141 52379440.001 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 13.69 348272 611612011 103658 ST. LOUIS PARK COMMUNITY BAND 75.00 CL PERFORMANCE 6/26/11 264250 061011 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 75.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/16/2011 - 6116/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 348273 6/1612011 117685 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 248.49 EASELS 264329 108719552 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 248.49 348274 6116/2011 101015 STREICHERS 42.74 FLASHLIGHT 263927 1842664 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 17.09 263988 1839394 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 17.09- 263989 CM249850 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 256.29 AMMO 264232 1842667 1400.6551 AMMUNITION 299.03 348275 6/16/2011 102925 SUPERIOR TECH PRODUCTS 885.87 FERTILIZER 263866 3724 -RGR 5422.6540 FERTILIZER 885.87 348276 6/16/2011 121492 SUPERIOR TURF SERVICES INC. 2,623.61 TEBUCONAZOLE 00006073 263867 7054 5422.6545 CHEMICALS 2,623.61 348277 6/1612011 110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO 59.63 PHONE CHARGER 263868 30103 1260.6188 TELEPHONE 59.63 348278 6/16/2011 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 6/1512011 7:55:02 Page - 25 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS ENGINEERING GENERAL 562.00 264070 03042 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 574.00 264071 03041 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 608.00 264072 MVP01757 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,744.00 348279 611612011 124834 TELVENT DTN 798.00 WEATHER SERVICE 00001993 264142 3391049 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 798.00 348280 6/1612011 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 181.05 264073 642603 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,594.35 264074 642602 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 348281 6116/2011 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 291.66 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 263869 2011 -56457 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 291.67 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 263869 2011 -56457 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/16/2011 -- 6/16/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 291.67 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 263869 2011 -56457 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 875.00 348282 611612011 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 19.74 WELDING GAS 00005038 264024 423214 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES 40.80 WELDING TANKS 264143 423215 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 60.54 348283 6/16/2011 124753 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES 207.69 COPIER USAGE 264233 179276795 7410.6575 PRINTING 207.69 348284 6116/2011 100682 TRUGREEN - MTKA 5640 160.32 WEED CONTROL 00001244 264280 024203 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 42.75 264281 024216 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 28.86 264282 024217 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 28.86 264283 024209 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 28.86 264284 024204 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 28.86 264285 024205 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 28.86 264286 024206 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 28.86 264287 024207 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 28.86 264288 024208 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 37.41 264289 024210 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 37.41 264290 024218 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 28.86 264291 024211 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 508.77 348286 6/1612011 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 282.76 MOWER PARTS 00001077 263870 S127015 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS 19,771.88 AERATOR FOR GOLF COURSE 00006269 263871 TE01024 5400.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 20,054.64 348286 6116/2011 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. 222.94 DOOR CLOSER 264234 457929 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 222.94 348287 6/1612011 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 796.75 SEED, EROSION CONTROL BLANKEMID06074 263872 25202 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 796.75 348288 611612011 115379 U.S. BANK 17.90 NET ZERO 263990 060211 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6/15/2011 7:55:02 Page - 26 Business Unit YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES PSTF ADMINISTRATION GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL TURF CARE GENERALTURFCARE MOWING GOLF BALANCE SHEET EDINBOROUGH PARK MAINT OF COURSE 8 GROUNDS CONTINGENCIES CITY OF EDINA 6/15/2011 7:55:02 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 27 6/16/2011 - 6/16/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 126.10 INTERNET 263990 060211 1550.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 144.00 348289 611612011 125032 UNI- SELECT USA 1,056.39 AUTO PARTS 263928 053111 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,056.39 348290 611612011 101051 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 112.22 264144 053111 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 4,376.93 264144 053111 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 4,489.15 348291 611612011 118221 UNITED HEALTH GROUP 80.07 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 264330 JERRY MACHALEK 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 80.07 348292 6116/2011 122221 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC. 286.58 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 00001273 264331 93550415 -001 1301.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 286.58 348293 6/1612011 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 9.77 SHIPPING CHARGE 264275 5947 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 9.77 348294 611612011 101908 US FOODSERVICE INC 173.32 CUST 43805514 264145 053111 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 263.28 CUST 43805514 264145 053111 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 357.10 CUST 43805514 264145 053111 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 576.38 CUST 43805514 264145 053111 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 2,651.30 CUST 43805514 264145 053111 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 4,021.38 348295 6/1612011 100410 USA•MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. 13.24 PAGER 263873 U6096083F 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 13.24 348296 611612011 123319 VACATION SPORTS 744.00 UNIFORM SHIRTS 00002088 264146 1990 5630.6201 LAUNDRY CENTENNIAL LAKES 744.00 348297 6116/2011 101068 VAN PAPER CO. 74.34 TOWELS, PLATES, UTENSILS 00007513 264025 198627 -00 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/15/2011 7:55:02 Council Check Register Page - 28 6/16/2011 -- 6116/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 558.84 LIQUOR BAGS 00007513 264025 198627 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 633.18 348298 6116/2011 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 131.37 986748710 264026 2580760161 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 85.97- 286364630 264027 2466064918 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 45.40 348299 611612011 119464 VINOCOPIA 490.56 263966 0040123 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 490.56 348300 6/1612011 101071 WALLIN, JOHN 87.72 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 264332 061011 1160.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE FINANCE 87.72 348301 611612011 129240 WARNACUT, MARCELLA 53.99 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 264266 060911 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 53.99 348302 611612011 101078 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT 102.00 LIFT REPAIR 00001991 264028 0042933 -IN 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 102.00 348303 6116/2011 103196 WHEELER HARDWARE CO 526.95 DOOR REPAIR 00008048 264147 SPI14317 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 526.95 348304 6/16/2011 127768 WIGLEY AND ASSOCIATES 2,455.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 264148 193553 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 2,455.00 348305 6/1612011 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 771.55 263967 271216 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,740.75 264075 271615 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 963.80 264188 271618 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,476.10 348306 611612011 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 693.97 263968 364293 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 422.74 264189 365075 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 547.29 264190 365077 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/16/2011 -- 6116/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 3,027.96 264191 365079 5862.5513 4,691.96 348307 6/16/2011 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 263.85 263969 581190 5822.5513 28.10 263970 579765 5862.5515 167.00 263971 582311 5862.5515 65.10- 263972 832385 5822.5513 33.10- 263973 832384 5822.5513 35.90 264076 583446 5862.5515 3,943.38 264077 583443 5862.5512 7,755.71 264078 583445 5862.5513 1,560.74 264079 583449 5822.5513 567.73 264080 583447 5822.5512 66.33 264081 583448 5822.5515 5,918.63 264082 583453 5842.5513 8,435.02 264083 579778 5842.5512 5,779.85 264084 583450 5842.5512 208.27 264085 583451 5842.5515 120.73 264086 583452 5842.5512 1,995.15 264087 582309 5862.5513 216.00 264192 584109 5842.5513 68.78 264193 583444 5862.5515 37,032.97 348308 6/16/2011 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 5,170.95 263974 755899 5842.5514 64.50 263975 755901 5842.5514 64.50 263976 755900 5842.5515 1,279.60 263977 754964 5822.5514 3,661.15 264088 756885 5842.5514 43.00 264089 756886 5842.5515 108.00 264090 755930 5862.5515 107.70 264091 755929 5862.5515 1,208.65 264092 756279 5862.5514 1,352.00 264093 755928 5862.5514 203.90 264149 755669 5430.5514 83.42- CREDIT ON ACCT 264194 6/2011 5822.5514 13,180.53 348309 6/16/2011 101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY 137.78 PUTTER RACK 00002087 264150 259546 5630.6406 6115/2011 7:55:02 Page - 29 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 50TH ST SELLING CENTENNIAL LAKES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 6/16/2011 - 6/16/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 137.78 348310 6/16/2011 127774 WORLDWIDE CELLARS INC. 323.00 264094 11 -28872 5662.5513 323.00 348311 6/16/2011 101726 XCEL ENERGY 540.78 51- 6137136 -8 263875 283876246 5430.6185 561.82 51- 4827232 -6 263876 283868839 5311.6185 32.32 51- 4151897 -6 263877 284020472 1646.6185 979.43 51- 69799484 263878 284059497 5821.6185 1,321.09 51- 69799484 263878 284059497 5861.6185 1,599.29 51- 69799484 263878 284059497 5841.6185 30.32 51- 7567037 -0 263879 284064664 1321.6185 5,100.64 51- 6621207 -1 263929 284052561 5913.6185 366.42 51- 9013604 -6 263930 284085204 5913.6185 5,875.80 51- 6824328 -7 264235 284562356 5420.6185 4,162.66 51- 6840050 -6 264236 284562057 5921.6185 4,352.54 51- 6121102 -5 264237 284547861 1646.6185 24,923.11 348312 6116/2011 103584 XPEDX 5.50 FUEL SURCHARGE 263931 9012846966 2210.6123 1,592.54 ABOUT TOWN PAPER 263932 9013097986 2210.6123 447.28- CREDIT 263933 9012505109CREDI 2210.6123 T 1,150.76 348313 6/16/2011 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 14,008.74 FUEL, DIESEL 00001200 264238 438371 1553.6581 16,387.92 FUEL, UNLEADED 00001200 264239 438705 1553.6581 30,396.66 348314 6/16/2011 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 58.50 264095 10303 5862.5513 58.50 348315 6/16/2011 122316 ZACK'S INC. 123.50 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00001059 263874 26889 1646.6406 114.07 BROOMS 00001146 264029 26890 5913.6406 237.57 6/15/2011 7:55:02 Page - 30 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE POOL OPERATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY STREET LIGHTING REGULAR DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION CLUB HOUSE SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT BUILDING MAINTENANCE MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS GASOLINE GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 6/15/2011 7:55:02 Page - 31 Subledger Account Description Business Unit GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 604,380.32 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 604,380.32 Total Payments 604,380.32 Council Check Register 6/16/2011 — 6/16/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 348316 6/16/2011 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 156.22 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 264240 54067369 7411.6406 156.22 348317 6/1612011 101091 ZIEGLER INC 450.00 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE 264333 E6395927 1551.6180 450.00 6/15/2011 7:55:02 Page - 31 Subledger Account Description Business Unit GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 604,380.32 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 604,380.32 Total Payments 604,380.32 R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 212,189.89 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 2,225.42 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 104.80 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 22,733.70 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 768.03 05100 ART CENTER FUND 5,718.65 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 3,729.76 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 46,361.36 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 30,667.44 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 7,846.54 05800 LIQUOR FUND 179,617.57 05900 UTILITY FUND 38,988.15 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 1,068.24 05950 RECYCLING FUND 38,820.60 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 10,446.75 09900 PAYROLL FUND 3,093.42 Report Totals 604,380.32 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 6116/2011 - 6/16/2011 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing polic�ies�and Malnacgr I- 6/1512011 7:55:59 Page- 1 CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMEi.. iEGISTER 4/26/11- 5/25/11 Card Holder Aerchani Account Name Trans Date Amount Purchase Discription Merchant Name Merchant City State Code WAYNE HOULE 2011/05/04 $39.20 DOOR PIVOT, LATCH ROCKLER WOODWORK 014 MINNETONKA MN 5841.6406 WAYNE HOULE 2011/05/06 $13.90 BAG TIES MIDWEST FENCE SOUTH SAINT f MN 1318.6406 WAYNE HOULE 2011/05/11 $61.11 TRAILER WINCH WEST MARINE #194 MINNETONKA MN 1641.6406 WAYNE HOULE 2011/05/18 $85.50 STREAMERS -OPEN HOUSE CATER RENT 612 - 5881188 MN 5913.6406 WAYNE HOULE 2011/05/20 $175.00 APWA REGISTRATION GLANZER AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS DAN.PAVLICH@ MO 1280.6104 WAYNE HOULE 2011/05/24 $625.00 APWA REGISTRATION HOULE AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS 816 -472 -6100 MO 1240.6104 JOHN KEPRIOS 2011/04/27 $35.61 EQUIPMENT RENTAL PB METER REN *TAL 800 - 228 -1071 CT 5621.6235 JOHN KEPRIOS 2011/04/28 $110.00 MEMBERSHIP MN STATE HORTICULTUR ROSEVILLE MN 5631.6105 JOHN KEPRIOS 2011/05/01 $49.53 ADAPTIVE REC PROGRAM PINSTRIPES EDINA MN 1629.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2011/05/05 $44.97 ADAPTIVE REC SUPPLIES TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1629.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2011/05/06 $358.61 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES SAND BLAST ENTERTA 850 - 968 -9206 FL 1624.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2011/05/06 $89.28 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES TPC *GOPHER 800 - 533 -0446 MN 1624.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2011/05/09 $60.00 LEADERSHIP WORKSHOP MN RECREATION AND PARN763- 571 -1305 MN 1624.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2011/05/09 $280.80 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES GUILDCRAFT 716- 7438336 NY 1624.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2011/05112 $55.93 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES EMOVENDO MAGNETS 304 - 257 -1193 WV 5630.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2011/05/14 $130.00 CONFERENCE U OF M ARBORETUM OL 952 -443 -1435 MN 5621.6104 JOHN KEPRIOS 2011/05/17 $120.44 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES WM SUPERCENTER SE2 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 1624.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2011/05/18 $16.24 ADAPTIVE REC SUPPLIES TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1629.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2011/05/21 $19.00 JUNIOR TENNIS MEMBERSHIP UNITED STATES TENNIS 914 - 696 -7000 NY 1623.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2011/05/21 $19.00 JUNIOR TENNIS MEMBERSHIP UNITED STATES TENNIS 914- 696 -7000 NY 1623.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2011/05/21 $19.00 JUNIOR TENNIS MEMBERSHIP UNITED STATES TENNIS 914 - 696 -7000 NY 1623.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2011/05/21 $19.00 JUNIOR TENNIS MEMBERSHIP UNITED STATES TENNIS 914 - 696 -7000 NY 1623.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2011105/21 $19.00 JUNIOR TENNIS MEMBERSHIP UNITED STATES TENNIS 914 -696 -7000 NY 1623.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2011/05/21 $19.00 JUNIOR TENNIS MEMBERSHIP UNITED STATES TENNIS 914 - 696 -7000 NY 1623.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2011/05/21 $19.00 JUNIOR TENNIS MEMBERSHIP UNITED STATES TENNIS 914 - 696 -7000 NY 1623.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2011/05/21 $19.00 JUNIOR TENNIS MEMBERSHIP UNITED STATES TENNIS 914 - 696 -7000 NY 1623.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2011/05/21 $19.00 JUNIOR TENNIS MEMBERSHIP UNITED STATES TENNIS 914 -696 -7000 NY 1623.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2011/05/21 $19.00 JUNIOR TENNIS MEMBERSHIP UNITED STATES TENNIS 914 - 696 -7000 NY 1623.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2011/05/21 $19.00 JUNIOR TENNIS MEMBERSHIP UNITED STATES TENNIS 914 -696 -7000 NY 1623.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2011/05/21 $19.00 JUNIOR TENNIS MEMBERSHIP UNITED STATES TENNIS 914 -696 -7000 NY 1623.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2011/05/21 $19:00 JUNIOR TENNIS MEMBERSHIP UNITED STATES TENNIS 914 - 696 -7000 NY 1623.6406 JOHN KEPRIOS 2011/05/24 $249.00 ADVERTISING CAMPUSSPORT 877 - 338 -8015 WI 5621.6122 JEFF LONG 2011/04/25 $225.00 CONFERENCE REGISTRATION PAYPAL *EASTAFRICAN 402 - 935 -7733 CA 1400.6104 JEFF LONG 2011/04/25 $465.90 E AFRICAN CONFERENCE DELTA AIR 0068647367917 ATLANTA GA 1400.6104 JEFF LONG 2011/04/29 ($166.88) REFUNDED PARIS LV CASINO FRONT D; LAS VEGAS NV 1400.6104 JEFF LONG 2011/05/04 $558.40 OSSI CONFERENCE DELTA AIR 0062349648088 LOS ANGELES CA 2310.6104 JEFF LONG 2011/05/11 $2.72 SUPPLIES TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1400.6406 JEFF LONG 2011/05/13 $18.75 REPLACEMENT SCREWS LCOM GLOBALCONNECTIVI' 978- 682 -6936 MA 1400.6160 JEFF LONG 2011/05/25 $125.00 TRAINING -TONY MARTIN VAN METER & ASSOCIATES 614 - 451 -8901 OH 1400.6104 $5,941.35 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing poll 'es and nrnrprhirae date &�(3 1( CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 4/26/11 - 5/25/11 Card Holder Aerchani Account Name Trans Date Amount Purchase Discription Merchant Name Merchant City State Code DEB MANGEN 2011/05/21 $169.98 CONFERENCE HOLIDAY INN NEW ULM NEW ULM MN 1180.6104 JOHN WALLIN 2011/04/25 $159.24 HEALTH CONFERENCE -JEFF RUTTGER'S BAY LAKE LOD DEERWOOD MN 1490.6104 JOHN WALLIN 2011/04/25 $159.24 HEALTH CONFERENCE - SOLVEI RUTTGER'S BAY LAKE LOD DEERWOOD MN 1490.6104 JOHN WALLIN 2011/04/29 $123.20 GASB 34 BOOK GOVERNMENT FINANCE OF 312 - 977 -9700 IL 1160.6405 JOHN WALLIN 2011/04/29 $160.91 HUMAN RIGHTS MEETING PATISSERIE MARGIO EDINA 952 - 9260548 MN 1504.6218 JOHN WALLIN 2011/05/03 $319.14 COUNCIL WORKSHOP D BRIAN'S DELI - #6 MINNEAPOLIS MN 1100.6106 JOHN WALLIN 2011/05/05 $44.40 HUMAN RIGHTS MEETING PATISSERIE MARGIO EDINA 952 - 9260548 MN 1504.6218 JOHN WALLIN 2011/05/11 $353.99 POLICE MICROWAVE SEARS COM INTERNET 800 - 676 -5543 IA 44005.6710 JOHN WALLIN 2011/05/16 $25.94 HEALTH SUPPLIES RELIABLE PAPER, INC 678 - 324 -3099 GA 1490.6406 JOHN WALLIN 2011/05/17 $270.30 COUNCIL WORKSHOP D BRIAN'S DELI - #6 MINNEAPOLIS MN 1100.6106 ROBERT WILSON 2011/05/18 $79.00 RETAIL SUMMIT LBP "REALESTATECOMMGR 312 -416 -1860 IL 1190.6104 $5,941.35 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing poll 'es and nrnrprhirae date &�(3 1( 0 e �0aa REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. IV. C. From: Ceil Smith Assistant to the City Manager Date June 21, 2011 Subject: .2012 Insurance Renewals 1) Property, 2) General Liability and 3) Workers Compensation Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: NA NA Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Traveler's 1. $842,969 2. League of MN Cities Insurance Trust $10,000 deductible 2. $911,563 3. League of MN Cities Insurance Trust $ 1,000 deductible 3. $1,142,273 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Traveler's $842,969 GENERAL INFORMATION: Presented herein are the quotes for renewal for Property insuring $123,222,325, Mobile Equipment, Auto Liability, Auto Physical Damage, General Liability, Employment Practices, Law Enforcement, Liability, Public Management, Liquor Liability, Workers Compensation. Attached is a comparison of total premium of all the City's insurance coverage. The quotes were put together by City's agents, Mr. Bill Homeyer and Mr. Jack Carroll. Staff is recommending that the City accept the low quote of the Traveler's at $842,969 which is a 1.92% decrease in the premium. Mr. Homeyer and Mr. Carroll will be at the City Council meeting of June 21, 2011. Administration Si nature / The Recommended Bid is x Departme within budget not within budget ---"��',, Joh# Wallin, Finance Director Scott H.N"eal, City Mabger League of MN Cities League of MN Cities Traveler's City of Edina Insurance Comparisons 2010 N/A N/A $859,498 $10, 000 deductible on all coverage z $ 1,000 deductible on all coverage 2011 $911,563 $1,142,273 z $842,9693 3 No deductible on Worker's Compensation, Liquor Liability, General Liability, Auto Liability. These deductibles on the remaining coverage that range from $1,000 to $10,000 and $25,000 deductible on employment practices. 4 of tle REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV. D. From: John Keprios, Director Park and Recreation Department ® Action F-1 Discussion Information Date: June 21, 2011 Subject: Letters of Support for Federal Transportation Funding for Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: West Segment and East Segment 1110 ACTION REQUESTED: Staff recommends that the City Council approve Three Rivers Park District's request for letters of support for 2011 Metropolitan Council's regional solicitation for federal transportation funding to develop the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Three Rivers Park District is applying for two Surface Transportation Program Grants to assist in the development of Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail in the City of Edina. The two projects are briefly outlined below and further summarized in attached 2011 Surface Transportation Program Grant Description and Map attachment. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: West Segment Construct approximately three miles of new multi -use regional trail between Trunk Highway 169 and Tracy Avenue in the City of Edina. Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: East Segment Construct 3.75 miles of new multi -use regional trail between Tracy Avenue and the Edina Promenade in the City of Edina. To strengthen the competitiveness of each grant application, Three Rivers Park District is requesting a letter of support from the City of Edina for each unique application. City of Edina June 22, 2011 Mr. Donald J. DeVeau Director of Planning and Development Three Rivers Park District 3000 Xenium Lane North Plymouth, MN 55441 -1299 RE: Letter of Support for 2011 Metropolitan Council Regional Solicitation for Federal Transportation Funding - Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: East Segment The City of Edina would like to express support for the Three Rivers Park District in their Surface Transportation Program (STP) grant application to implement a trail between Tracy Avenue and the Edina Promenade in the City of Edina. It is our understanding that this project would construct a segment of trail approximately 3.75 miles long that utilizes parkland along the Nine Mile Creek Corridor and road right of way. The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail project will connect schools, neighborhoods and mixed -use businesses and will be a valuable asset to the regional trail system. This trail segment will provide an important route affording both recreational and non - motorized transportation opportunities through an area currently underserved by regional trails. The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail project is consistent with Edina's Comprehensive Plan. The project meets goals and guidelines regarding land use and open space as listed in the 2009 Comprehensive Plan update. The development of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail is also strongly recommended in the City's Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan. The Edina City Council has approved the proposed trail alignment and passed resolutions of support for the trail. The City of Edina is looking forward to working with the Three Rivers Park District to develop the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. Thank you for seeking funding for this regionally significant project. Sincerely, Mayor James Hovland City of Edina City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 Park and Recreation Department www.cityofedina.com 952 - 826 -0367 FAX 952 - 826 -0385 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 a Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail East: Project Description and Map 2011 Surface Transportation Program Grant Application Construct 3.75 miles of new multi -use regional trail between Tracy Avenue and the Edina Promenade" in the City of Edina. The regional trail route utilizes parkland along Nine Mile Creek wherever possible and feasible. East of Trunk Highway 100, the trail splits away from Nine Mile Creek and is located within a combination of parkland and road right -of -way, Some trail segments may require partial road reconstruction to accommodate the trail within existing road right -of -way. This project includes a. new pedestrian /bicycle bridge over Trunk Highway 100. The route. is identified on the below map, Ell _ , � 1! � n i %'— - --- -: r ,. .. -''•:j�— I� '.sal - -= ._. —;;��- —i.T _._. _ IT _ Edina Richfield • Iw J62 1; MO. Creek �� R gi �I T 1 fr�Tr� Bloomington . T Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail East Segment Site Level Map n eJL[new 1i:,r ,.,.e rr«• ,.a,.e. r,., Ci.nr s.. N . ThreeRivers O.rS' 'O7" O.6 Mlea '� °n• "w^'F•�•' ^!r^ PARK DISTRICT :- .E.w -w rvr..a .rv.•c.,.^ .i•[.a„. aa+.. Trail construction will consist of at -grade bituminous trail construction over non - wetland areas and raised boardwalks over wetland: areas. An environmental assessment for this project was completed in 2010 and resulted in a Negative Declaration for an Environmental Impact Statement. Trail construction along Nine Mile Creek is anticipated to be constructed with. creek restoration efforts. The preliminary construction estimate for this segment is $8.97 million. June 22, 2011 Mr. Donald J. DeVeau Director of Planning and Development Three Rivers Park District 3000 Xenium Lane North Plymouth, MN 55441 -1299 City of Edina RE: Letter of Support for 2011 Metropolitan Council Regional Solicitation for Federal Transportation Funding - Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail: West Segment The City of Edina would like to express support for the Three Rivers Park District in their Surface Transportation Program (STP) grant application to implement a trail between TH 169 and Tracy Avenue in the City of Edina. It is our understanding that this project would construct a segment of trail approximately 3 miles long that utilizes parkland along the Nine Mile Creek Corridor and road right of way. The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail project will connect schools, neighborhoods and mixed -use businesses and will be a valuable asset to the regional trail system. This trail segment will provide an important route affording both recreational and non - motorized transportation opportunities through an area currently underserved by regional trails. The Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail project is consistent with Edina's Comprehensive Plan. The project meets goals and guidelines regarding land use and open space as listed in the 2009 Comprehensive Plan update. The development of the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail is also strongly recommended in the City's Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan. The Edina City Council has approved the proposed trail alignment and has passed resolutions of support for the trail. The City of Edina is looking forward to working with the Three Rivers Park District to develop the Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail. Thank you for seeking funding for this regionally significant project. Sincerely, Mayor James Hovland City of Edina City Hall Park and Recreation Department 952 - 826 -0367 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0385 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 www.cityofedina.com t. Nine Mlile.Creek Regional Trail West: Project Description and Mlap 20.11 Surface Transportation Program Grant Application Construct approximately three miles of new multi -use regional trail between Trunk Highway 169 and Tracy Avenue in the City of Edina. The regional trail route utilizes parkland along Nine Mile Creek'wherever possible and feasible. There are some segments of trail that will occur within or adjacent to road right -of -way. Some trail segments may require partial road . reconstruction to accommodate the trail within existing road right -of -way. This project includes a new pedestrian /bicycle bridge over Trunk Highway 62. The route is identified on the below map, i Hopkins �; x.., - e Minnetonka: _ :.,. III • � / ,'I � � `•� �- . • n 6 ,...,. � _ i � ..,... .Edina 1 Nine Mile Cmek Regional Trail Corridor Y "° t "• - • , �•� K r1_ 62 ZZ- `N ne MiM Creek I Regi —1 Trail ,.f r trl 't,,.f._! \ rr �� 1 i _ _ .f"� . , rt i00400`��•, �4. Al Nine Mile Creek Regional Trail West Segment 1 ,Site Level Map 4 Th reeR ivef s ro . on y.. n'°.weui.0 �� _. 0 0.1:6 025 0.5 Mtles 1. i` •• .ew _... Hv.+e• v' O.i nM u Y �.. w .... �..m %� .U. „..�.wr.,....,•...�- i - •.�e.•e.s�� ..a.,. i •o� )i PARKDlST1CT Trail construction will consist of at -grade bituminous trail construction over non - wetland areas and raised boardwalks over wetland areas. Two easements from non - residential property owners are anticipated for this project, An environmental assessment for this project was completed in 2010 and resulted in a Negative Declaration for an Environmental Impact Statement. Trail construction along. Nine Mile Creek is anticipated to be constructed with creek restoration efforts. The preliminary construction estimate for this segment is $6.92 million, %k 0 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. Item # IV. E. From: John Keprios, Director Park and Recreation Department Date: June 21, 2011 Subject: Award of Bid - Edina Aquatic Center FlowRider Addition Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: Wednesday, June 1st, 2011 July 30, 2011 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Aqua Logic: Base Bid "A" 1. $412,700.00 2. Shaw Lundquist: Base Bid "A" 2. $578,000.00 3. LS Black: Base Bid "A" 3. $617,000.00 4. Morcon Construction: Base Bid "A" 4. $779,998.00 5. Aquatic Development: Base Bid "B" 5. $608,430.00 6. Global Specialty: Combination Bid "C" 6.$1,102,610.00 7. Magney Construction: Combination Bid "C" 7. $1,257,400.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Aqua Logic for Base Bid "A" $412,700.00 Aquatic Development for Base Bid "B" $608,430.00 Combined total for Base Bid "A" and Base Bid "B" $1,021,130.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: On Wednesday, June 1 sc we opened bids for the Edina Aquatic Center FlowRider addition. In an attempt to get the best possible pricing for the City of Edina we separated building the pool basin, filter room and site construction from the purchase and installation of the surf equipment. We had four companies bid part "A" the pool basin and site construction, one company bid part "B" the surf equipment and two companies bid a combination to do both which is part "C ". We have great respect for Aqua Logic as a pool contractor and have used them in the past with success. Aquatic Development is the only company in the United States authorized to sell and install the FlowRider. Therefore, Global Specialty or Magney Construction would have to purchase this amenity from Aquatic Development. There is $1,200,000 budgeted for this CIP project previously approved by Council ($600.000 for 2011 and another $600,000 for 2012). Even with previous and remaining architect and engineering fees, total project costs will be approximately $150,000 under budget. The only company that manufactures this FlowRider product is Waveloch who require their customers to enter into a "License to Operate and FLOW Membership Agreement." A copy of that agreement is included as an attachment. City Attorney Roger Knutson has reviewed this agreement and made necessary adjustments that have been agreed to by Waveloch. With the Edina City Council approval the construction of the pool basin and additional site work can begin mid to late July so we can achieve substantial completion of the project by May 11, 2012. John Kep , Director This Recommended bid is X within budget Edina Park and Recreation _ Department 6"-It-j— s- - nn budget J n Wallin, Finance' Director Scott fital, City Hager [Date] Company Name Attn.:. Company Contact Name' Company Address Line li Company Address Line 2 Company Address Line 3 RE: Your F1owRider® Sheet Wave License to Operate Dear Contact Name, Welcome to the F1owRider community! We at Wave Loch are passionate about our products. We love to share the thrill of boardsports with our customers and our end users. We are a technology company with a lifestyle commitment. Our attractions are not just a ride, but the foundation of a sport. Flowriding is represented in 28 countries and in over 120 venues. As a member of the FlowRider community, you will be joining a proud group of companies - Royal Caribbean International, Village Road Show (Warner Bros), Great Wolf Resorts, Samsung, Carnival Corporation - that have used our product to grow their business. Through the attached agreement, we license you to operate and promote the F1owRider at your venue. Additionally, we offer you membership in the Flowriding League of the World ( "FLOW "), which is the sports federation founded by Wave Loch to develop consistent competitive rules and regulations to promote the sport of flowriding. Membership in FLOW will allow your venue to be part of this global sport. When your venue is host to a FLOW event, you can garner additional media opportunities, public relations exposure, sponsor revenue, and attendance. As an additional revenue source for your operations, this agreement also provide you the opportunity to purchase flowboards, bodyboards and FlowRiderO branded clothing and other merchandise. We look forward to our partnership and your involvement in the development of the sport of flowboarding. Sincerest Regards, [Name] [Title] Enclosure WAVE TECHNOLOGY I S P O R T I L I F E S T Y L E F1owRider® Sheet Wave Attraction License to Operate and FLOW Membership Agreement TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Parties, Attraction and Site Information ..................................................................... ..............................1 2. Definitions .................................................................................................................. ..............................1 3. J Grant of License to Operate and Promote Attraction ................................................. ..............................2 4. Membership in FLOW (Flowriding League Of the World) ....................................... ..............................3 5. F1owRider Merchandise ............................................................................................. ..............................3 6. Government Permits ................................................................................................... ..............................3 7. Promotion of Safe Use and Maintenance of the Attraction ....................................... ..............................3 8. Confidentiality ........................................................ ............................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 9. Software Licenses ...................................................................................................... ..............................3 10. Patented Devices ........................................................................................................ ..............................4 11. Term and Termination ............................................................................................... ..............................5 12. General Provisions ...................................................................................................... ..............................5 Exhibit1 - Definitions .................................................................................................... ............................... 6 Exhibit 2 - Notices, Instructions & Warnings .......................................................... ............................... Exhibit 3 — Release of Liability and Indemnity Agreement ........................................... .............................11 Operator Initials Wave Loch Initials FlowRider Sheet Wave Attraction License to Operate and FLOW Membership Agreement This FlowRider® Sheet Wave Attraction License to Operate and FLOW Membership Agreement ( "Agreement") is entered into by the indicated parties pursuant to the following terms and conditions: 1. Parties. Attraction and Site Information. 1.1. Parties Wave Loch, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company ( "Wave Loch ") a [list business entijA ( "Operator "). 1.2. Attraction The FlowRider® sheet wave attraction as substantially illustrated: The Attraction does not include Site Works (including the containment structure shown in gray). While the Attraction image is of a FlowRider Double, this Agreement shall cover all embodiments of the FlowRider such as the FlowRider Junior, FlowRider Single, FlowRider Double, and FlowRider Wave -in -a -Box. 1.3. Site Enter Site Address is where the Attraction shall be situated. 1.4. Address For To Operator: To Wave Loch: Notices Wave Loch LLC Company Name Attn.: Marshall Myrman Attn.: Company Contact Name 210 Westbourne Street Company Address Line 1 La Jolla, CA 92037 USA Company Address Line 1 Tel. +1 (858) 678 -9650 Tea Email Email marsh @waveloch.com With Copy to: W. David Osborne Wave House / Wave Loch 3146 Mission Boulevard, Ste. F Tel. +1 (858) 678 -9677 Email david.osborne @wavehouse.com 1.5. Effective Date 2. Definitions. In order to simplify this Agreement, italicized words are defined in Exhibit 1. Operator Initials Wave Loch Initials 3. Grant of License to Overate and Promote Attraction. 3.1. License to Operate Attraction. Wave Loch hereby grants to Operator, and Operator accepts a limited license to: 3.1.1. operate and maintain the Attraction solely at the Site; and 3.1.2. use the Attraction and the Attraction Images for the sole purpose of promoting the Site's ordinary course of business, and use the Attraction for on -site sponsorship. Operator cannot, however, unilaterally allow the Attraction or Attraction Images to be used for any third party advertising, television/motion picture production, sponsorship, or promotion without Wave Loch's prior written consent. For example, Operator can enter into a contract allowing a third party to have a banner or sign near the Attraction, but cannot enter into a contract with a third party allowing that third party to use images of the Attraction to sell or showcase their products in commercials without Wave Loch's prior written consent. 3.2. Limitation on Licensed Rights. 3.2.1. This Agreement does not provide any ownership interest in or to Wave Loch's Patents, Proprietary Information, Improvements or Licensed Rights nor any right to sublicense or divide any of the rights granted herein. Operator shall not register any intellectual property rights related in any way to the Patents, Proprietary Information, or Improvements. 3.2.2. Operator shall not resell or reinstall the Attraction, reverse engineer the Attraction, or manufacture install or operate any derivative stationary wave inside or outside of the Site. 3.2.3. The rights and licenses granted herein are personal and non - assignable, and are granted herein only as specifically enumerated above and no other rights are intended by the parties or shall be implied by this Agreement, by any custom in the trade or by any course or history of dealing between the parties. All other rights are reserved by Wave Loch. 3.3. Use and Ownership of the Marks in the Promotion and Operation of the Attraction. Wave Loch places great value on the Marks and the goodwill associated with the Marks. Therefore, it is the intent of the parties that the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be adequate and reasonable to assure the consuming public and the industry that the Attraction advertised and promoted by Operator under the Marks are of the same consistently high quality as that offered by Wave Loch and others licensed under the Marks. Accordingly, Operator shall use the Marks, if at all, only in the form and under the specific conditions as set forth herein. Without limitation Operator acknowledges and agrees that: 3.3.1. Wave Loch shall provide the Attraction with the Wave Loch and FlowRider Marks displayed on the Attraction as indicated in Section 1.2, which Marks Operator shall maintain throughout the life of the Attraction. 3.3.2. Operator will advertise and promote the Attraction in compliance with all applicable laws and shall at all times conduct its activities under this Agreement in a lawful manner, 3.3.3. Operator will abide by the policies and procedures established by Wave Loch regarding proper trademark usage as set forth in the FlowRider Brand Book. Operator shall submit to Wave Loch for its prior approval any new uses of the Marks that do not follow the trademark usage guide set forth in the FlowRider Brand Book. 3.3.4. Operator will not engage or become involved in any activities that diminish or tarnish the image or reputation of the Marks or of Wave Loch. 3.3.5. In no event shall Operator have the right to modify the Marks or use them in combination with other marks not licensed herein, or use the Marks as a trade name, company name, trade style, d.b.a. or fictitious name. Wave Loch may, in its sole discretion, prohibit Operator from using the Marks on or in connection with the advertising or promotion of any goods or services which fail to conform to the high.quality standards prescribed by Wave Loch. Upon notification from Wave Loch, Operator shall immediately discontinue its use of the Marks in connection with any such substandard goods or services. 2 Operator Initials Wave Loch Initials 3.3.6. All uses by Operator of the Marks, whether authorized or not, shall inure solely to the benefit of Wave Loch. Operator further agrees that it has not and will not seek to obtain, either directly or indirectly, any registration of the Marks in any countries and that any such registrations so obtained are hereby irrevocably assigned to Wave Loch. 3.4. Operator agrees to allow the marking of the Attraction with a patent notice in compliance with applicable patent marking requirements or as Wave Loch shall otherwise specify from time -to -time. 3.5. Operator agrees that it will not take any action, either directly or indirectly, challenging the validity of the Patents or the Marks or any other of the Licensed Rights or Wave Loch's lawful possession of the Licensed Rights anywhere in the world. 4. Membership in FLOW ( Flowriding League Of the World). 4.1. To develop the sport of Flowriding, Wave Loch has established FLOW to develop consistent competitive rules and regulations to promote increased participation at the local level and coordinate local marketing with Wave Loch's national and international marketing and advertising efforts. FLOW currently operates, sanctions and supports the United States FLOW(RIDER) Tour, International Flowriding Championships and the World FlowRider Championships, 4.2. Operator shall be a member of FLOW at no additional cost and as such, shall be granted the potential opportunity at Wave Loch's and Operator's mutual agreement to be a FLOW competitive event venue and part of a FLOW tour event. 4.3. Operator agrees that FLOW shall be the exclusive sanctioning body for all FLOW competitive events and agrees to abide by all FLOW guidelines when conducting competitive events and that Wave Loch shall retain a sole reservation of media and sponsor rights specific to all FLOW competitions. 5. FlowRider Merchandise. Wave Loch shall provide to Operator the opportunity to purchase flowboards, bodyboards and FlowRider branded clothing and other Merchandise. Operator, however, has no independent merchandising rights to the Attraction, Attraction Images or any trademark rights associated with the Attraction or related goods and services. 6. Government Permits. Operator shall be responsible for all governmental stamps, permits, and licenses state and local taxes, building fees, permit fees, bonds, inspection fees, surcharges, and any other costs relating to the operation of the Attraction at the Site. 7. Promotion of Safe Use and Maintenance of the Attraction. 7.1. To promote the safe use and maintenance of the Attraction, Operator will: maintain and operate the Attraction in accordance with the Manual; post and maintain all warnings and notices as issued by Wave Loch (such as those in Exhibit 2 modify or alter the Attraction only with the express prior written authorization of Wave Loch; increase or decrease the discharge flow rate or velocity of the Attraction only with the express prior written authorization of Wave Loch; and use only Wave Loch approved bodyboards and flowboards. 7.2. Operator must require all persons, including but not limited to paying or complimentary guests, employees, staff, or any other riders on the Attraction to sign a Release of Liability Agreement with the form and substance set forth as Exhibit 3. (With Wave Loch written consent, Operator may modify the Release for purposes of enforceability). 8. Confidentiality. 8.1. Operator shall hold the Confidential Information in confidence and shall use its best efforts to protect the secrecy of, and avoid inadvertent or purposeful disclosure and unauthorized use of, such Confidential Information. Without limiting the foregoing, Operator shall use at least the same degree of care it uses to safeguard its own proprietary information to safeguard the confidentiality of Wave Loch's Confidential Information. Operator agrees not to disclose any of the Confidential Information to its employees, agents, third parties, customers, or vendors except to the extent necessary to install, operate and maintain the Attraction at the Site. Operator shall use its best efforts to prevent any unauthorized disclosure by those employees, agents or third parties to whom such 3 Operator Initials Wave Loch Initials Confidential Information is disclosed. Operator shall be responsible for any breach of the provisions hereof and/or improper disclosure by such employee, agent, third party, customer, or vendor. 8.2. Operator agrees that it shall only use Confidential Information solely to operate and maintain the Attraction at the Site and for no other purpose or reason. 8.3. It is agreed that the obligations of confidentiality and non -use imposed hereunder are world -wide in scope and will apply to all Confidential Information disclosed to Operator (whether or not such information is obtained by Operator after the effective date of this Agreement from other sources, including without limitation from third parties or through reverse engineering or independent derivation), except that the obligations set forth in this Agreement shall not apply to any Confidential Information which: (i) is, or later becomes, public knowledge other than by breach of the Agreement or any other confidentiality obligation; (ii) is already in the possession of Operator with full rights to disclose at the time of disclosure by Operator, as evidenced by written records; (iii) is obtained by Operator from a third party without a breach of such third party's obligations of confidentiality; (iv) was independently developed by Operator without use of or reference to Wave Loch's Confidential Information, as evidenced by written records; or (v) is required by law or court order to be disclosed by the receiving party, provided that Operator gives Wave Loch prompt written notice of such requirement prior to such disclosure. 8.4. All data created, collected, received, maintained or disseminated for any purpose in the course of this Agreement is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13 which supersedes paragraphs 8.1, 8.2, and 8.3 if the provisions conflict 9. Software License. If the equipment provided pursuant to this Agreement contains software, including that which the manufacturer may have imbedded into the hardware an integral part of the equipment, Wave Loch shall pay all software licensing fees. Wave Loch shall also pay for all software updating licensing fees for a period of one year following cutover. Wave Loch shall have no obligation to pay for such fees thereafter. Nothing in the software license or licensing agreement shall obligate the operator to pay any additional fees as a condition for continuing to use the software. 10. Patented Devices. Materials and Processes. If this Agreement requires, or Wave Loch desires, the use of any design, devise, material or process covered by letters patent or copyright, trademark or trade name, Wave Loch shall provide for such use by suitable legal agreement with the patentee or owner and a copy of said agreement shall be filed with the owner. If no such agreement is made or filed as noted, Wave Loch shall indemnify and hold harmless the owner from any and all claims for infringement by reason of the use of any such patented design, devise, material or process, or any trademark or trade name or copyright in connection with the project agreed to be performed under the Agreement, and shall indemnify and defend the owner for any costs, liability, expenses and attorney's fees that result from any such infringement. 11. Term and Termination. 11.1 This Agreement shall continue in effect so long as any Attraction is operating at the Site, unless terminated sooner as provided below. 11.2 In the event of any breach of this Agreement, the party alleging such breach shall give written notice of the breach to the allegedly breaching party specifying the nature of the breach and how it is to be cured. The breaching party shall have thirty (30) days from the date of receipt of the notice in which to cure such breach, save that where the breach is a failure to pay any sum by the due date such period shall be three (3) days. In the event that such breach has not been cured within thirty (30) days or three (3) days, as the case may be, of receipt of such notice, the non - breaching party shall have the right, upon giving written notice to the breaching party, to terminate this Agreement and recover its actual damages not to exceed the amount of Wave Loch's sales price of the Attraction. 11.3 Upon termination of this Agreement, all rights and licenses granted (if any) by Wave Loch shall immediately cease and Operator shall cease operation of the Attraction. 11.4 All data created, collected, received, maintained or disseminated for any purpose in the course of this Agreement is governed by the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act (the "Act "), Minn. Stat. CH 13 when applicable, any other applicable statute or any state rules adopted to implement the Act, as well as federal 4 Operator Initials Wave Loch Initials regulations on data privacy (collectively the "Data Laws "). In the event of a conflict between the Data Laws and any other provisions of this Agreement, the Data Laws shall govern. 12. General Provisions. (a) Nothing herein should be construed to create an employer - employee relationship, partnership, or joint venture. (b) This Agreement is the entire understanding and agreement of the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes any and all oral or written agreements or understandings between the parties as to the subject matter hereof. (c) No supplement, modification, or amendment of this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing by all the parties. (d) Except where specified otherwise in this agreement, no party may assign this Agreement or any of its rights or delegate any of its duties here under this Agreement without the consent of all other parties. (e) No waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be deemed, or shall constitute a waiver of any other provision, whether or not similar, nor shall any waiver constitute a continuing waiver. (f) Each individual executing this Agreement on behalf of a business entity, or submitting any documents required during the term of this Agreement, represents and warrants that he or she is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said business entity and that this Agreement is binding upon said business entity in accordance with its terms. (g) This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. It is agreed that an original, photocopy, PDF or fax copy of a signature may serve as an original. (h) If any legal action or other proceeding, including any bankruptcy proceeding, is brought for the enforcement of the Agreement, or because of an alleged dispute, breach, default, or misrepresentation in connection with any of the provisions of this Agreement, the successful or prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorneys' fees and other costs incurred in that action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief to which it or they may be entitled. "Prevailing party" within the meaning of this Section includes, without limitation, a party who agrees to dismiss an action or proceeding upon the other's payment of sums allegedly due or performance of covenants allegedly breached, or who obtains substantially the relief sought by it. (i) Whenever possible, each provision of this Agreement shall be interpreted in such manner as to be valid under applicable law. In the event that any provision of this Agreement shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, the remaining provisions shall remain in full force and effect. 0) The parties' rights and obligations will bind and inure to the benefit of their respective successors, heirs, executors and administrators and permitted assigns. (k) All notices shall be by international mail or by other commercially reasonable means where receipt is acknowledged, and shall be effective on the date of receipt thereof. Notice may also be given by telex, facsimile or similar electronic means, provided that the party giving such notice obtains acknowledgement that such notice has been received, in which case such notice shall be effective as of the date receipt is acknowledged. Either party may change the address to which notice is to be sent by giving notice to the other party at the address and in the manner provided above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed and become effective as of the date above first written. Wave Loch: WAVE LOCH LLC By: Marshall Myrman Chief Operating Officer Operator: By:_ Name: Title: $ Operator Initials Wave Loch initials Exhibit 1 Definitions For purposes of this Agreement the following terms shall have the specific meanings as set forth below: 1. "Attraction Image" means any image, photograph, video, rendering or other likenesses of the Attraction, whether currently in existence or hereinafter devised, or otherwise. 2. "Confidential Information" means information disclosed by Wave Loch or its affiliates to Operator and either identified by Wave Loch as secret or confidential or which, from the circumstances, in good faith and conscience Operator should realize is confidential regardless of the form of disclosure, e.g., orally, visually, in writing or electronically, including, without limitation, information concerning any Licensed Rights, Attraction, Proprietary Information, Improvements, business plans, product plans, materials, sources and/or vendors of materials, products, processes, manufacturing plans, methods and/or techniques, samples, designs, drawing, specifications, models or prototypes, marketing information, pricing information, research and development information, and any other proprietary, non - public information related to the products offered by Wave Loch and the business operated by Wave Loch. 3. "FlowRider" means the sheet wave water ride attraction as substantially shown in paragraph I of this Agreement, and shall include the ride structure itself, along with any appurtenant equipment. 4. "Improvement(s)" means any improvements, inventions, discoveries, techniques, systems, methods, processes, developments, enhancements or modifications (whether or not patentable, commercially useful or reducible to writing or practice) developed in connection with any sheet waves by any party to the Agreement 5. "Licensed Rights' means inclusively all rights held by Wave Loch under the Patents, Improvements and Proprietary Information. 6. "Manual" means Wave Loch's Operations and Procedure Manual for the Attraction regarding the operation and maintenance of sheet waves, which may from time to time be updated by Wave Loch. 7. "Marks" means the trademarks and service marks available online in the FlowRider Brand Book at the password protected site media.waveloch.com, whether appearing alone or in combination with any other marks (if any) as may be authorized in writing by Wave Loch. 8. "Merchandise" means clothing and souvenirs such as shirts, hats, sweatshirts, headgear, footwear, and beach towels containing the Marks, trade dress, names, logos and symbols set forth in the FlowRider Brand Book. 9. "Patents" means the patent or patents that cover sheet waves, including the Attraction, and any continuations, continuations in part, reissues, extensions and divisionals thereof, and all corresponding foreign patents and applications throughout the world. 10. "Proprietary Information" means the drawings, design specifications, software, know -how, trade secrets, licenses, and other confidential information relating to the design, construction, operation or maintenance of FlowRiders. 11. "Site Works" means the works necessary to build the concrete pool and civil infrastructure that will house the Attraction including, but not limited to excavation; grading; steel placement; drains and drain placement; sewer and storm drains; fresh water fill and potable water lines; backfill; concrete works including caissons, footings, floors, decking, walls, entry supports and stairs; walkways, pool construction including plumbing, steel, electrical, mechanical, waterproofing, filtration, heating, water sanitation, gratings, and pool walk coatings or anti -slip coverings; all welding and mechanical connections; landscaping, railings, barriers, fencing, signage, furniture, sound and lighting. 6 Operator Initials Wave Loch Initials Exhibit 2 Notices, Instructions & Warnings Minimum Requirements; >42V, 'tau must be at least 42' to bodloboard oi You anumi be at leant Sr to stand-tip rde Yost mum be able to va m In Fast moving turbulent water ®o NOT participate if you have any of the following conditions: Recent Surgery orlOwss vewtcondttbri Neck. Back or Bone AAments Prew —Ky High Blood Pressure Linder the 6nHueme of or Aneurisms Drugs or Alcohol Lai�. vw. �l�u ;.,iipr•Vr...di.cY.�e..�. ►��rw mi.- :a:.r ►. �.rrr1.l�:araew..a 4r •. ...1+wJ'�.�le�yu�►.r.... i;li�lil ►..'ill t ►; 4LM.tW,i.,'1i1:101 6 J.i.s s ?. 5,1'N+Jt1{ 1� %�f,�i. i1f$tId 1,U9.Y', 1ar#5i1; 51dV tiil,SSN firt. Y,►:.�{.9►y kit4 �a 1�.a.�i; ►.iCkLl:; ►,_11451 �, riu.7U.L NC.J.1► +1,`. �F, L,rK,4:►7i 6"* Lai, 4F 1 ;4t,:,i..Si: ^It,fait, i.�'6 40 W, I is.4N,itu,ri!,i/aa:irfr►. i.bur.crb nkW:v....r{r i....w.�►f►rrr r1i.dy po,saae.rLwy...a . sr. Operator Initials Wave Loch Initials Exhibit 2 WAF Avg will !.» r • 1 'm • RIDING THE FLOWRIDER IS AN EXTREME SPORT AND HIGH RISK RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY. YOU WILL FALL: • FALLING MAY RESULT IN THE BOARD STRIKING YOUR BODY; OR YOUR BODY STRIKING THE SURFACE OF THE FLOWRIDER WITH GREAT FORCE: • BEFORE ATTEMPTING TO RIDE, WATCH THE SAFETY VIDEO AND UNDERSTAND THE RISKS OF THIS ACTIVITY • READ AND OBEY ALL POSTED SIGNS AND PICTORIALS • OBEY ALL LIFEGUARD INSTRUCTIONS • FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH SIGNS OR INSTRUCTIONS MAY INCREASE THE RISK OF SEVERE PERMANENT INJURIES OR EVEN DEATH THE FOLLOWING TECHNIQUES MAY HELP MINIMIZE THE RISK OF INJURY: 1 TUCK INTO A BALL AS COVER YOUR HEAD S. TRY TO ORIENT FEET FIRST YOU BEGIN TO FALL FACE WITH BOTH BEFORE HITTING ANY SURFACE ARMS 1L HANDS O MCD W— Wcl' -'.x. ail 9Y'fs Ane m 1 Operator Initials Wave Loch Initials Exhibit 2 PRCPDI gCNRD Po6frGp C�;;L; DQTRT - •- +'•�712.O71CG3 6OCWSARD fiam50KTw PUIC;S'JC930CrA0%GJDVIN PLAM BEAR01MTD FICW AND COV.IM TGJR wvcm NT a' IIL►�CLq ;lGO'M IYMOFiV71RS [[II TDIP CN CARRa q1►L - ! ffQAA 3R l 6DMk Ar UP AM TCVIINDiII[FIDV:C[M[R :1SIVa Y4L'A LtfS Al gllDD[IS RD.IRa7 RCILkD AL FSICW1C11 J i PJSH DO N.00 CONN Puu up. 0.2, UP IM&M TO TURN J , i 9 i Operator Initials Wave Loch Initials - • s Siff FRC4V50CWR'. ` - '� •t.'!q 1 �AwscCsogemracMFixxv L it y arm GDDr PNJ71O11 PL40 IurT 1 ACM CR R171/T} mun-7 II RLYRa I j .r . ! FIGRTFDCMPDWYDN . "..�. - �► - ♦ ..v` ..,.. :.;w;� sass. .... --m n Fmr4wiCut CF cm zmm i 9 i Operator Initials Wave Loch Initials - Exhibit 2 Notices, Instructions & Warnings 1. This is a very strenuous ride. The moving water is extremely turbulent. 2. Bodyboarding or Flowboarding on this sheet wave is a body- active, participatory sport. As with all sports, care must be taken to avoid a mishap. 3. Riders must be in good physical condition and free from any physical limitations to participate. Pregnant women and persons with or having a history of heart, back, neck, shoulder or joint problems should not ride. 5. Jewelry, hats, .foot wear, eye glasses, or loose articles of any type are not recommended on the ride as they may injure the participant. 6. Bathing suit tops, bottoms and loose clothing may be pulled off by the flowing water. Cover -ups are suggested. 7. Avoid jumping into or entering the ride at high speed; avoid weight on front foot — YOU WILL WIPE OUT! 8. Steer your board into the center of the flowing water. You can control your board by gently shifting your weight. Try to keep your board pointed in the direction of the oncoming flow of water. Edge control is the key. Keep weight on your back foot! 9. If you wipe out, do not hold your board. Release board immediately, cover your head, and keep limbs close to body and try to brace for impact with feet fast. 10. Single riding only is permitted. No tandem riders or multi - person riding is allowed. 11. To reduce the risk of a tear, trimmed nail digits are recommended. 12. Rider should be barefoot as water shoes may get caught on the ride and injure the participant. 13. CAUTION! The ride surface of this ride is very slippery. DO NOT attempt to walk on the ride surface. You may only stand to walk and exit after coming to a complete stop on the dark blue drain grating. 14. Obey the lifeguard at all times. 10 Operator Initials Wave Loch Initials Exhibit 3 ' FlowRider® Voluntary Acknowledgement of Risks, Release of Liability and Indemnity Agreement First Name Last Name Middle Initial Street Address City State Zip Email Address Telephone Number Birth Date Age State Driver's License/ID Card Number Issuing State Expiration Date rgency Contact Name rgency Contact Telephone RIDING ON THE FLOWRIDEe IS AN EXTREME SPORT AND HIGH RISK RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY. SHEET WAVE SURFING ON OR IN PROXIMITY TO THE FLOWRIDER MAY RESULT IN PHYSICAL OR MENTAL INJURY, ILLNESS OR DISEASE, OR DEATH This document affects your legal rights. By writing your signature below, you acknowledge that you have read and understood the disclosures of risks, voluntarily accept those risks, and agree to be bound by all terms of this Release of Liability and Indemnity Agreement My signature acknowledges that I or the minor for whom I am a legal guardian (collectively referred to as "I ", "me ", or "my ") have voluntarily chosen to participate in the sheet wave surfing attraction known as the FlowRider or use a Flowboard (collectively referred to as the "Activities ") and to use the facilities at [Insert Facility Namme], including but not limited to the FlowRider (collectively referred to as the "Facilities "). In consideration of the permission to participate in the Activities and use the Facilities, I hereby acknowledge, agree, promise and covenant on behalf of myself, my heirs, assigns, personal representatives and estate with Wave Loch, Aquatic Development Group, Inc., [Insert Operator's name} and [Insert Facility Name] each of their lessors, parent companies, subsidiaries, related companies and business concerns, past and present, and each of them, as well as each of their partners, trustees, directors, officers, members, intellectual property holders, agents, attorneys, servants and employees, past and present, and each of them (collectively referred to as "Releasees ") as follows: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS OF RISKS: I UNDERSTAND AND ACKNOWLEDGE that the Activities in which I am about to voluntarily engage bear certain known risks and unanticipated risks that could result in PHYSICAL OR MENTAL INJURY, DEATH, ILLNESS OR DISEASE, OR DAMAGE to me or my property. I understand and acknowledge those risks may result in claims against Releasees. However, I am making an informed choice to voluntarily accept such risks due to the thrills, excitement and benefits of the Activities, and I agree that the benefit of the Activities outweigh the risks, which include but in no way are limited to: (1) The acts, omissions or negligence in any degree of Releasees, or their agents or employees; (2) the risks inherent in the Activities, including but not limited to any injuries such as a) broken bones, b) dislocations, c) tom ligaments and tendons, d) sprains and strains, e) cuts to the head, body and/or limbs, f) torn nails, and g) bumps and bruises suffered while riding these extreme sporting attractions, (3) latent or apparent defects or conditions of the Activities or the Facilities; (4) improper or inadequate instruction or supervision regarding the Activities or use of the Facilities (5) the behavior of co- participants; (6) accidents or incidents in the Facilities, including but not limited to accidents or incidents in wet areas, such as pool decks, tiled, concrete or other wet surfaces; and/or (7) first aid, emergency treatment or services rendered or failed to be rendered by Releasees, or their agents or employees. I UNDERSTAND AND ACKNOWLEDGE that the above list is not complete or exhaustive, and that other risks, known or unknown, identified or unidentified, anticipated or unanticipated may also result in injury, death, illness, disease, or damage to me or to my property. I FURTHER ACKNOWLEDGE that I am in good physical and mental health, and not suffering from any condition, disease or disablement which would or could potentially affect participation in the Activities or use of the Facilities. Further, I acknowledge that I am not purchasing or leasing the attraction, but rather, am being afforded a non - exclusive right to use the attraction. Additionally, I acknowledge that Releasees are providing recreational services. VOLUNTARY ACCEPTANCE AND ASSUMPTION OF RISK AND RESPONSIBILITY: I EXPRESSLY AND VOLUNTARILY AGREE, COVENANT AND PROMISE TO ACCEPT AND ASSUME ALL RESPONSIBILITIES, AND RISK FOR INJURY, DEATH, ILLNESS OR 11SEASE OR DAMAGE to me or to my property arising from the participation in the Activities or use of the Facilities. 11 Operator Initials Wave Loch Initials RELEASE AND INDEMNITY: 1 VOLUNTARILY RELEASE AND FOREVER DISCHARGE AND COVENANT NOT TO SUE Releasees and all other persons or entities affiliated therewith, from any and all liability, claims, demands, actions or rights or action, which are related to, arise out of, or are in any way connected with the participation in the Activities or use of the Facilities, including, but specifically not limited to any and all negligence or fault of Releasees. I UNDERSTAND THIS IS A RELEASE OF LIABILITY THAT IS VALID FOREVER, and will apply to current and future participation in the Activities or use of the Facilities. I understand that this RELEASE OF LIABILITY will prevent me, my ch. my heirs or my estate from bringing any action at law, suit in equity, or other jurisdictional proceeding or making any claim for damages, injury or death in the event of damage, injury or death arising from participation in the Activities or use of the Facilities. I FURTHER AGREE, PROMISE AND COVENANT TO HOLD HARMLESS AND TO INDEMNIFY Releasees, and all other persons or entities from all defense costs, including attorneys' fees, or any other costs incurred in connection with claims for mental or bodily injury, wrongful death or property damage that may be tiled by me, my child, my heirs or my estate. Such indemnity and defense obligation shall further extend to any claim, loss or lawsuit which alleges that I negligently or intentionally caused any injury, death or damage to spectators or other third parties in the course of my participation in the Activities. RELEASE OF ALL RIGHTS RELATED TO MY AUDIO AND PHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGE: I hereby agree to a blanket release of all rights related to my audio and photographic image that may arise out of my participation in the Activities or use of the Facilities. I understand that this release includes any and all marketing, promotion or advertising that may occur anywhere and anytime on any media as later used by Releasees. Further, I hereby grant full permission for Releasees, to record any or all of my participation, and my name and likeness in the Activities for photos, motion pictures, TV, radio, Internet, recordings, videotapes, and other media, known or unknown, and to use them in perpetuity, no matter by whom taken or recorded, in any manner for publicity, promotions, advertising, trade or commercial purposes, without any reimbursement of any kind due to me, or the need to pay me any fee whatsoever. I agree that Releasees will be the exclusive owner of all rights, including but not limited to the copyrights, in and to the recordings and the results and proceeds of my participation hereunder ( "Materials "). I agree that the Materials shall constitute a "work made for hire" pursuant to the United States Copyright Act. To the extent any of the Materials are not considered a "work made for hire," I hereby assign all rights in the Materials to Releasees. Such assignment shall be deemed irrevocable and coupled with an interest. ENTIRE AGREEMENT, SEVERABILITY AND VENUE: I understand that this is the entire Agreement between the undersigned and Releasees, and that it cannot be modified or changed in any way by the representations or statements of Releasees or any employee or agent of Releasees, or by the undersigned. I understand and agree that this Agreement is severable and that if any clause is found to be invalid, the balance of the contract will remain in effect and will be valid and enforceable. I agree that any action will be brought in a court in the County of San Diego, State of California or alternatively, in a court of competent jurisdiction in the State of California. Any disputes will be subject to and determined under the laws of the State of California I have read this entire document, understand it completely, and agree to be bound by its terms. Participant's Legal Name (please print): Participant's Signature: (If Participant is a minor) Legal Guardian N Date: (If Participant is a minor) Legal Guardian Signature: Date: AFFIDAVIT OF PARENT OR LEGAL GUARDIAN I, the undersigned, declare that I am the parent of, or the legal guardian of, the below named minor, and have the capacity to execute documents on behalf of such minor. I understand that as a condition to participate in sheet wave surfing on the FlowRider the parent or legal guardian of the minor participant must sign certain legal documents, including but not limited to Acknowledgements of Risks, Releases, and Indemnity Agreements. I am signing those documents, freely, without any fraud or duress and acknowledge that I have read and understand the same. In the event that it is determined that I am not the parent or legal guardian of the minor, or did not have the legal capacity to execute the documents on behalf of said minor, then I agree to defend and indemnify: Wave Loch, Aquatic Development Group, Inc. [Insert Operator's name] and [Insert Facility Name] each of their lessors, parent companies, subsidiaries, related companies and business concerns, past and present, and each of them, as well as each of their partners, trustees, directors, officers, members, intellectual property holders, agents, attorneys, servants and employees, past and present, and each of them, if any litigation is instituted, as a result of any injury or death or claim for damage arising out of, relating to, or in any way connected with, minor's participation in sheet wave surfing on the FlowRider or use of the Facilities. I understand that this indemnity provision is in addition to (and not in lieu of) any other indemnity provision found in this document. Participant's Legal Name (please print): Legal Guardian Name: Legal Guardian Signature: Date: 12 Operator Initials Wave Loch Initials �88e � REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. IV. F. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer Date: June 21, 2011 Subject: Fire Hydrants Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: May 31, 2011 June 31, 2011 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Ferguson Waterworks $ 51,941.25 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Ferguson Waterworks $ 51,941.25 GENERAL INFORMATION: This purchase is for 18 fire hydrants. Staff had learned earlier this spring that our normal specified fire hydrant, the Clow Medallion manufactured by Clow Valve Company, was behind on their production schedule for 2011. Staff also learned that the City has priority over a contractor in securing the available hydrants. 15 of these hydrants will be installed in the Golf Terrace Neighborhood; the remaining three fire hydrants will be placed in our inventory. This purchase will be funded through the Water Utility Fund. Staff recommends awarding the purchase to Ferguson Waterworks. Public Works Signature Department The Recommended Bid is within budget not within udg_et -J hn Wallin, Finance rector cott Neal, City Mana r G: \Engineering \Administration \CORRPW \RFP - Misc \Item IV.F. Fire Hydrants.docx w91N��r� 0 �y ,899 REPORURECOMMEN ®ATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: IV. G. From: Wayne Houle, PE' ® Action Public Works Director/ ❑ Discussion City Engineer Information Date: June 21, 2011 Subject: Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreements — Minnehaha Woods Area ACTION REQUESTED: Authorize Mayor and City Manager to approve attached Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreements for the sanitary sewer and water services for the Minnehaha Woods Roadway Reconstruction Area. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Residents were required to upgrade their sanitary sewer service line from the mainline to the right -of -way line and were encouraged to upgrade the entire line to their house, as well as their water service line. Residents requested that the extra cost be added to the special assessment for the project. Our City Attorney prepared the attached agreements, which adds this cost to the final special assessment cost which will be known at the end of the project. Staff anticipates additional agreements to be approved by the City Council as other phases of the project are completed. ATTACHMENTS: O Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreement that have been returned to date. G: \Engineering \Contract Numbers \2011 \ENG 11 -5 Minnehaha Woods Street & Bridge Reconstruction \SS -460 Minnehaha Woods \ADMIN \CORR \LETTERS AND EMAILS \Item IV.G. Public Improvement and Special Assessment Agreements - Minnehaha Woods Area.docx PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City Of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of Ji]A) , 20 J/—, by and between the CITY OF 7DINA , M' ota municipal corporation ( "City ") and ).,IAA4 A j—.^ husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 3., Block 2, of Colonial Grove Fifth Add'n having a street address of 5524 Woodcrest Dr., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $2,995.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Highview Plumbing Inc. 4301 Highview Place, Minnetonka, MN 55345 'the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No 1680 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1680 for the amount of $2,995.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $2,995.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET ] FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA MV (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF 'ff NV1e (ss. _-1he foregoing instrument was a knowledged befo me this day of 20(, by OL, �. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON IILALL90111 Professional Association ". 317 Eagandale Office Center �P. �O�1reMM1�:1.>�R 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn K oe�, o H� 'A bRPo �9� PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this `i day of , 20 , by and betweer} the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corpo ation ( "City ") and (the "Pr perty Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 5, Block 1, of Minnehaha Woods having a street address of 5421 Woodcrest Dr, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $3,100.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Mpls, MN 55406 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1008 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1008 for the amount of $3,100.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $3,100.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA CW (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument 20 11 , by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: acknowledged before me this day of NOTPbY PUBLIC Pj MTD S VAM K :___ tSD Nary Le * 0xMd"�=L> PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this I "' day of �'Iz , 20-�L, by and e e t e CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and (�2M,� S� , husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 61 Block 14, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5520 Park PI., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $3,996.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Ouverson Sewer and Water, Inc., P.O. Box 247, Loretto, MN 55357 `the "Contractor ") to construct the .Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No 1682 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1682 for the amount of $3,996.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $3,996.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina . com TTY 952- 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA M (SEAL) ODD STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. r NOTA PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) . (ss. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowl 20_0_, by W, 1) 1 DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn before me this day of NO'Q0Y PUBLIC 2 YTd�WiONKMIIC�tAiD ND��P1�sllb�l�� MlOeere�E�l�ti►M.� IAM IIJ SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this 133.4- day of 20 , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and komA5 UV �oK ev=7z2 7T M,, 5ic5 &tu Von/ Buhr , husband and wife (the "Property Owner'). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 21 Block 1, of Minnehaha Woods having a street address of 5413 Woodcrest Dr., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $3,920.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Highview Plumbing Inc. 4301 Highview Place, Minnetonka, MN 55345 'the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No 1669 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1669 for the amount of $5,120.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $5,120.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424-1394 www.CityofEdina.corn TTY 952 -826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) _►79 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument I ",) e ,201 /,by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: acknowledged before me this � day of NOTARY PUBLIC AA LYNE I I E BIUNNO NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA My Commission+ Expires Jan. 31, 2016 0 ao �£ JUN 14 Zell PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City Of Edi11ci AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this WEI day of iyrie, , 20_LL, by and between the CITY OF ED INA a Minnesota munici al corporation ( "City ") and llkehl , husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 31 Block 3, of Shady Pines Addition having a street address of 5505 Woodcrest Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced Sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $8,100.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Benjamin Franklin 1424 Third St. North, Minneapolis, MN 55411 'the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No 1020 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1020 for the amount of $8,100.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $8,100.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) MAD STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of ., 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 3 U yit✓ , 20_a_, by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn 9-7 day of 2 LAMA 811JRGESS AAA PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City Of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of , 20 , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and r y c,° ve r-, a,r,,A ,;JS -/L r` KLG V1ElY , husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 9, Block 14, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5532 Park PI, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property"). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $4,050.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis & Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So. , Mpls, MN 55406 (the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1037 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1037 for the amount of $4,050.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of 4 0$ 50.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY WNER: 6(L UGr-- S�rS - �Gl✓r Vi' STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 11- day of c)Onr— , 20 t t , by 'St-ace- - Xlewz.,, aid 3&&rA*% KLev,o>^ DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC CHARTRIE Vot' Notary Public Minnesota My Commission Expires January 31, 2D12 2 w91�11� o • �cOne$e �// PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT V,�E , R� of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this _ day of :a XCK� , 20 , by and betwee the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and � i C" husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 31 Block 8, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5408 Brookview Ave, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced Sewer & water and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $6,675.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis &Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Mpls, MN 55406 'the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No 1006 was issued to the. Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1006 for the amount of $5,675.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $5,675.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 -826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) l STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) . (ss. COUNTY. OF ) The foregoing instrument - , 20J, by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC PROP OWNER: 5 acknowled ed before me this i day of PUBLIC 2 Is a 130» cp, PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this f Q a day of c1 y NC , 20 (� , by and betwe the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and A LN , husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 41 Block 1, of Colonial Square having a street address of 5605 Kellogg PI., Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $4,500.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Minneapolis &Suburban Sewer & Water, 3233 45th Ave. So., Mpls, MN 55406 'the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No 1665 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1665 for the amount of $4,500.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $4,500.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA : (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) i ss. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument 20jL, by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn PRO ackn NOT PUBLIC OWNER: � 1 rrOWNAN arts��. before me this day of M00 bly Oonn�hdan 8iplw.lw X1.1016 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of .� ►'�� , 20�, by and between the CITY :OINA,-.-,a Mil nesoja, nicipal corporation ( "City ") and husband and wife (the "Property Owner") RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 21 Block 1, of Shady Pines Addition having a street address of 5508 Dever Rd, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced Sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $3,700.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Ouverson Sewer and Water Inc. P.O. Box 247, Loretto, MN 55357 'the "Contractor") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No 1695 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1695 for the amount of $3,700.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $3,700.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.051. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 EST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA L'A (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The forego g instrument was acknowledged before me this — V day of L— , 20__L/, / by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City KO(nager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. IE CRANAER i v'r0ii11Eaw� YDlfe: �ilf 1121y ;1, 2 ,112 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: Ike, 29 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this , 20 , by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn NOTARY PUBLIC 2 day of PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT City Of Edina AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of � ya`9-� , 201\ , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and bt4o O (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 1, Block 14, of South Harriet Park having a street address of 5500 Park PI, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement) and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box and upgrading water service line to 1.5" from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and upgrade the service line to 1.5" from the stop box and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $3,334.42 (the "Project Cost ") from Metro General Services 5790 Quam Ave NE St. Michael, MN 55376 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1699 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1699 for the amount of $3,334.42. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of «Final Amt)) against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subjp rope,, C 1 952 - 927 -8861 City Hall FAX 952 - 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET TTY 952 - 826 -0379 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) HI STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWN STATE OF MINNESOTA ( ss. COUNTY OF ICMP The foregoing instrument was ack owle ged b f , 20.� ore me thi 7, day of , by v NOTAR PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association im1AALL�BOM 317 Eagandale Office Center $M PIB11A. 1380 Corporate Center Curve �►��wJw.sl.i�fa Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn 2 AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGREEMENT AGREEMENT made this day of J Vr�. , 20 , by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City ") and d- oznaM r �ko q—_ , husband and wife (the "Property Owner"). RECITALS A. Property Owner is the owner of Lot 6, Block 21, of Shady Pines Addition having a street address of 5509 Dever Dr, Edina, Minnesota (the "Subject Property "). B. The City has requested that Property Owner replace the existing sewer service line(s) from the trunk sanitary sewer pipe to the right -of -way line on the Subject Property ( "Public Improvement ") and also consider replacing water service line from the stop box in conjunction with City Project No. ENG 11 -5. C. Property Owner has replaced their sewer and has requested that the City assess the cost of the Public Improvement against the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT. The Owner received a quote of $2,400.00 (the "Project Cost ") from Metro General Services, 5790 Quam Ave NE, St. Michael, MN 55376 (the "Contractor ") to construct the Public Improvement. Property Owner entered into a contract with the Contractor to construct the Public Improvement and Purchase Order No. 1698 was issued to the Contractor. The work is completed and the Contractor has submitted an invoice to the City referring to Purchase Order No. 1698 for the amount of $2,400.00. The City is in receipt of a lien waiver for the work performed and will pay the Contractor. 2. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT. The City will assess the Project Cost in the amount of $2,400.00 against the Subject Property. The Project Cost will be assessed under the same terms as City Project No. ENG 11 -5. The Property Owner waives any and all procedural and substantive objections to the special assessments and to the Public Improvement and to City Project No. ENG 11 -5, including but not limited to hearing requirements and any claim that the assessment exceeds the benefit to the Subject Property. The Property Owner waives any appeal rights otherwise available pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 429.081. 3. BINDING EFFECT; RECORDING. This Agreement shall be binding upon the Property Owner and the Property Owner's successors and assigns. This Agreement may be recorded against the title to the Subject Property. City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET 1 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 CITY OF EDINA (SEAL) AND STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) James B. Hovland, Mayor Scott H. Neal, City Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by James B. Hovland and by Scott H. Neal, respectively the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. NOTARY PUBLIC PROPERTY OWNER: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instr ment was ckn 20 t , by DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 Telephone: (612) 452 -5000 RNK:srn /)0W--X"'j *4 6te� thi I day of PUBLI dTN "�o� GWEN A. RILEY SMITH a Notary Public State of Minnesota My Commission Expires y'• January 31, 2016 2 M REPORT /RECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: IV. H. From: Wayne Houle, PE Action Public Works Director/ F-1 Discussion City Engineer Information Date: June 21, 2011 Subject: Set Public Hearing (07/05/2011) - Valley View Sidewalk From McCauley Trail to Hilary Lane ACTION REQUESTED: Set a Public Hearing on July 5, 2011 for Valley View Sidewalk from McCauley Trail to Hilary Lane, Improvement No. S -095. IN FORMATION /BACKGROUND: City staff is requesting a public hearing for the construction of a raised sidewalk along the north and east side of Valley View Road from McCauley Trail to Hilary Lane. The project was initiated by petition and has included an extensive public process. The feasibility report for project will be presented to Council at the July 5, 2011 meeting. ATTACHMENTS: N/A G:\Engineering \Improvements \BA377 Valley View Rd fr McCauley to Braemar Blvd (Hairpin) \S095 Valley View Rd ft McCauley to Braemar Blvd (HairPin)\PRELIM DESIGN\Feasibility\Item IV. H. Setting Public Hearings for Valley View Sidewalk.docx o�[e � i.1 , REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. VI.A From: Cary Teague Planning Director ® 1-1 Action Discussion Information Date: June 21, 2011 Subject: Request For Minor Changes to Project Building — Waters Senior Housing ACTION REQUESTED: Amendment to approved site plan. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The Council is asked to consider if the proposed changes to the building proposed for the Waters project are minor and can be approved administratively by staff. (See the attached narrative and proposed changes to the plans.) If the Council believes the changes are significant enough for further review the proposal could be referred to the Planning Commission for an amendment to the site plan approval. The applicant could then chose to build the building as previously approved by the Council, or take the revisions to the Planning Commission. Per Section 850.04 of the Zoning Ordinance "minor changes may be authorized by the Planner. Proposed changes to the approved site plan affecting structural types, building coverage, mass, intensity or height, allocation of open space and all other changes which affect the overall design of the property shall be acted on, reviewed and processed by the Commission and Council in the same manner as they reviewed and processed the site plan." Per City Council policy, any changes proposed to a site plan are brought before the City Council to determine if the changes may be considered minor by staff. At the June 7, 2011 City Council meeting, consideration of this request was continued to solicit feedback from property owners within 1,000 feet. A notice went out following the meeting asking for written feedback. Attached are the letters and emails that have been received for Council consideration as of Thursday afternoon at 3:00 pm. Letters and emails received after that time will be placed before the Council on Tuesday night. Staff believes the proposal to reduce the size of the building by 28 feet is minor, and would not recommend an amendment to the approved site plan. ATTACHMENTS: Applicant narrative, site plans, elevations and renderings. Letters and emails from adjacent residents. THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING T H EPA T E R S OF EDINA SENIOR LIVING" Senior Housing Community on the campus of Colonial Church May 10, 2011 Cary Teague Planning Director City of Edina 4801 West 50`h Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Subject: The Waters Senior Living of Edina creation of some affordable housing Dear Cary, Since our initial submission, we have always worked to incorporate affordable housing into the Waters Senior Living of Edina. Creating affordable housing is an important mission to both Colonial Church and the Waters Senior Living. Affordable senior housing is needed in Edina. As you know there are over 10,000 Edina residents over the age of 65. The 2000 census estimated that 30% of these seniors, 3,000 Edina residents, would qualify for this affordable housing. The affordable housing would have rent and income limits will be set to meet the Met Council's affordable housing criteria. The affordable housing would also help Edina meet their Met Council affordable housing goal. Our proposal is to create seven affordable housing units (eligible to count toward the Met Council goal) through the reduction in development cost. The development cost reductions would be as follows: • Shorten the building by 28 feet - taking 28 feet out of the middle of the building. • Eliminate the underground parking below the memory support wing Attached is a revised site plan along with front and back elevations showing the proposed modifications. As you can see, these modifications have a negligible impact on the look of the building while shrinking it by 28 feet. The building modification will eliminate 36 of the 90 underground parking spaces. Twelve of the 36 parking spaces to be eliminated are double spaces primarily used for car / boat storage. Of the 73 surface spaces, 3 would be lost. There would be, 124 total parking spaces remaining. The zoning code requires 76 parking spaces. The parking requirement is exceeded by 63 %. We would also like the consideration of the Final Plat included with this item. Thank you for your consideration of our requests. Please call me at 952 - 358 -5110 with any questions. Sincerely, Jay Jensen Waters Senior Living SEE SHEET 001 — — — — - — — — — - - — — — — - (y SEE SHEET C302 — — — — — — — — — — — - - — — - - - -- — — — - — — - — i —__ —__ - — — — — - — -- — — — — — — — — — ; f r) f) I I [.)I -) I- --- . I — I , - L 0 o o I I I I 11�11 IT, I I t'l 0 0 7 s229 -4 z !It -1 5 12 9, A-40 70 ------------------------------------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- .. .. ., »- ..- -- - - -J PMIUNG 9MW)tY V Pmi— R!owr'-k SITE LAYOUT AND Bt ' � W SURFACING PLAN I T IE WATERS SENIOR I -000Li VING OF EDINA ; Waters Senior Living of Edina Revise d affordable housing. opportunity PubLC .Csoal: To create affordable senior housing units Strategy° Through a reduction m the development costs sufficient to reduce the annual debt service to make the affordable housing f inancially, viable. Affordable Housing: The rent and income limits will be set to meet the Met Council's affordable housing criteria (50% median inncome). Therefore, with this building modification, Edina -v iU be creating seven affordable housing units. Development cost reductions (creates 7 affordable units)° e Eliminate parking spaces under the memory support (36 spaces and still exceed the parking requirement)- o The building modification will eliminate 36 of the 90 underground parking spaces. Twelve of the 36 parking spaces to be eliminated are double spaces primarily used for car / boat storage. Of the 73 surface spaces, 3 would be lost. There would be 124 total parking spaces remaining. The zoning code requires 76 parking spaces. The parking requirement is exceeded by 63 %. Reduce the building length by28 .feet o Attached is a revised site plan along with front and back elevations showing the proposed modifications. As you can see,.these modifications have a negligible impact on the look of the building while shrinking it by 28 feet. AqPfovet , �� " --�- -,) \ Q�', WWI St VA ' dpa�4 ► s ► �y •''. • ► � y � � • 1 L f .� • ii ii1`i' • t IT" 6..... �. I �..Uii�ff:r:� 11 .. :iti•�1t YI<�I,�� Y La � � r �. .I« ■I► 1Y :17� • - �A!`A�: '�i ���1 i� ..� l �• .1 •,, L' ! ,1 ! � /v_. •• �,. -g .�,• , . � � � • R , `''•`fir 1 f . � • , � 1 i.•.,., t ri1 ,� 1• � � ` ► '� ` � 1 r, 1 _ .. ..yyam� •fr� �Ir '_ r• � MI r 1(/! �` 1 1,, ='• � `� ... e 1 .,r, j1 ir' ` �1+ ,y. ,' �w X +� 1 , � �� '•tip I , •,� , ;l � � 1 '� ' , '�.�fj' ,► • '�. IL. r 1 �� 1 = y� f 1 ' 1 ,r � � i �� ��i�i •,ii �' N � . f f �t s fir. •. c'I dill f IA ••° �'` z �i�l �'.�:•. .'�.r'i .�.i �.i .�: - � 1Lf :: `.��, YI Y Il lt..i � L /..:... � I fi � I I.„�:��1� ��..r f i � I A� �. I t1 '•. .�•i i '. -- - _.------ ------ ------ -- - - ------- -- - - -- OfZIGINAL. DESIGN REAR ELEVATION SOUTH ORIGINAL DESIGN PROPOSED DESIGN June 16, 2011 Dear Council Members: As a new member to this community I am concerned that this project was not brought to my attention before I purchased my home. I would have liked to have been informed as to the ramifications of my quiet enjoyment of this property which is guaranteed me by my purchase agreement. My Realtor lives in the area and had no idea this project was even happening. It seems to me as if these plans /proceedings are happening very quietly so as to inform as little people as possible so no one may have the opportunity to object. That disturbs me greatly. Is this how the City of Edina chooses to operate? I certainly hope I am mistaken in my impression. Obviously I am against this project happening at all. Having just recently purchased my home I am too late to object as certain deadlines have long past. I do not wish to have my beautiful residential neighborhood zoned commercial. I do not want my beautiful view to go away because of all the trees that will need to be cut down. The thought of the amount of traffic that will increase on Tracy Avenue, which is already greatly congested, has me deeply concerned. That fact that the Colonial Church of Edina is trying to sell this as affordable senior housing when I understand the prices will range from $3,000 - $9,000 is fraudulent advertising and extremely misleading to the portion of the community which is approving of this plan. If any tax dollars go towards this project that I disapprove of, I will be contacting my Senator and any Representatives I can. I would wish for this project to be entirely cancelled and located somewhere more appropriately. In lieu of that, I would like for this facility to be as small as possible, impacting the environment around it as little as possible. And I most certainly do not want any of my tax dollars going to fund this housing project. My last request would be for the people involved in this project to cease and desist in acting clandestinely so as to raise our suspicions as to what is happening with this project to warrant such actions. I do appreciate the City of Edina sending out the notice but a little more time to respond would have been appreciated. Sincerely, Lie Appel Cary Teague From: Susan <spetersen55436 @gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 20115:53 AM To: Cary Teague Subject: Waters Senior Housing I am responding to the Public Notice to Solicit Written Comment Regarding the Waters Senior Housing #1 This is a MAJOR change due to parking. Parking is already a big deal in this area and a lot of time was taken by all stakeholders to vet the adequacy of parking. If you recall this project was given the zoning code to PRD -5 when ALL other assisted living places, exactly like the Waters, are PSR -4, solely because they could not qualify for parking under PSR. We all need more time to truly understand the Parking Changes. There are parking problems here already, and it is a very big deal if Shelter is reducing parking by 44% of the areas they are changing. Also, another big concern is reducing common space. We all need to really understand what common areas they are reducing. Reduction need to be understood and vetted, and this all will take time to review these changes are understand them. There have been mistakes that have occurred at York with the air conditioner that City Staff overlooked. We all have researched a lot on this project, and we would like the original approval to remain, otherwise it should go in front of the Planning Commission, and City Council. And better yet there should really be a public hearing on this. In addition, by changing this building footprint it appears this also has a Major impact on the Watershed District requirements which should also be understood. Thanks, Jeff and Susan Petersen Jackie Hoogenakker From: Jim Beer <jbeer5804 @gmai1.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 20116:05 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Waters Senior Housing We would like to comment on the proposed changes to the Waters Senior Living housing. 1. We believe that the Edina statute does not discriminate between "minor changes" and changes. If a building makes changes from the originally approved plan, then it needs to through the approval process again. 2. Stated Public Goal- we have never been clear on what the structure is going to be, sometimes it's assisted living, sometimes it Senior living, sometimes affordable housing, and at the monthly rental we don't know anyone who can afford it. When this project was sold to the Council it was billed as state of the art, something the neighborhood would be proud of etc. Now we are being told that they need more affordable housing, a smaller gathering center, and less parking spots. This doesn't pass the smell test. 3. Why are the changes needed? We don't believe the Waters and Colonial are being upfront with why the changes are needed, they are not doing out of the kindest of their heart. If that was the case, they would not be doing it in this neighborhood, but at the site of the old public works building. 4. Going from 90 underground spots to 54 is a major change, downsizing the gathering area and adding "affordable units" why is this necessary? It will put more parking on the streets 5. Affordable housing - We understand Edina has enough affordable housing to meet the state requirements and that we don't need the 7 additional. 6. Bait and Switch - This project was never very well explained from the beginning, as a tax payer and citizen of Edina we felt left out of the process and that the Edina planning department and Shelter Corp were way to cozy about the outcome. The project gets approved anyway and now they want to make changes without fully disclosing what the issues are, and there are issues. We believe that it is the City Council's duty is to find out what those issues are and totally review this project from top to bottom. Once it's built there is no turning back, we will be stuck with what we have and we don't think at this point anyone can honestly say what we have. Jim and Liz Beer 5804 Jeff Place Edina, MN 55436 jbeer58042gmail.com Cary Teague From: Bob and Dennie <scrog007 @tc.urnn.edu> Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 20112:49 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Waters Senior Housing To the Edina City Council Re: Proposed changes to the Waters Senior Housing plan. We support the changes proposed in the Waters Senior Housing proposal. The changes are not significant in regard to the physical appearance or intensity or type of use. Furthermore, by creating affordable units, the development will be of greater benefit to the community. We have supported this development since it was first presented at Colonial Church. This property will not remain vacant and the Waters development is far better than other possible uses. The proposed changes will make this a better project for the neighborhood and for Edina. Robert and Denise Scroggins 6256 Sandpiper Court Edina, MN 55436 1 Cary Teague :rom: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 16, 20118:40 AM To: Cary Teague; Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Hi there, This message, due to incorrect spelling of e-mail addresses, is being forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Cary Teague and Jackie Hoogenakker. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno @ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: MaryAnn Meyer [mailto:marem @mindspring.comj Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 20119:10 PM To: Lynette Biunno; jhovland @krausehovland.com; mbridle @comcast.net; swensonannl @gmail.com; josh @ebburnet.com; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; cteaaue @ci.edina.mn.us; ihooaanakker @ci.edina.mn.us Subject: Dear Members of the City of Edina that should be looking out for the residents best interests. Please vote that the proposed Shelter /Colonial Water changes are required by ordinance to provide a public hearing in front of a planning commission and city council. This project'that seems to be moving foward w/ questionable motives on the part of both Colonial Church and the City of Edina has s000000000 much more negative impact on the neighbors and the residents of edina then it does positive. Take the time to see how this will affect us all! Thank You MaryAnn Meyer Cary Teague From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 16, 20118:32 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker; Cary Teague Subject: FW; (no subject) %- ; Lynette Biunno, Receptionist Ci 952-927-88611 Fax 952- 826 -0389 •, Ibiunno&i.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families Doing Sassiness From: Merlin1954 @aol.com [mailto: Merlin 1954 @ aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 20118:03 PM To: Lynette Biunno; jhovland @krausehoviand.com; mbrindle @comcast.net; swensonannl @gmail.com; joshs @cbburnet.com; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; cteaaue @ci.edina.mn.us; ihooaanakker @ci.edina.mn.us Subject: (no subject) Dear Mayor Hovland, and City Council Members Ann Swenson, Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, and Josh Sprague, Please VOTE THAT THE PROPOSED SHELTER/COLONIAL WATER's PROJECT CHANGES (reducing 39 parking spaces, and reducing common space by 28 feet, since changing the mass) ARE REQUIRED BY ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE A PUBLIC HEARING IN FRONT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL, AND THESE CHANGES ARE MAJOR CHANGES THAT SHOULD REQUIRE THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS. The reasons the changes are major are listed below. 1. The ordinance is clear — any change in mass should go through the full public hearing process. Period. City Council should enforce the City ordinance. If one reviews Edina Ordinance 850.04, Subd. 3 (1), reproduced below, you will not see how a reduction of the proposed building by 28 feet can be considered a "minor change ". The plain wording of the ordinance states that any proposed change affecting "building coverage" or "mass" "shall be acted on, reviewed and processed by the Commission and Council in the same manner as they reviewed and processed the site plan." 2.. This project is major - $30 million and 2 football fields long — and any change to it except maybe interior paint color or carpet color should be fully vetted. The project is not scheduled to break ground until spring 2012, so let's take the time to fully consider what these changes mean, all the possible impacts these changes may have on the project and the surrounding neighborhood and not rush to solely have the City Council vote on without the public hearing process, including a hearing in front of the Planning Commission too. 3. Shrinking Common Areas by 28 feet is Major: We should really know at a detail level what common areas are shrinking. Shrinking of a certain type of common areas could impact traffic, noise, etc. Again, there is nothing small about a $30 million project. "Reduction of common spaces" is really all encompassing. Reducing of commons spaces can have impact on the number of additional trips that may need to be made. More time needs to be taken to understand these impacts. 4. Cutting 39 parking spaces is Major in this Residential Area. a. Parking was raised several times by neighbors as a concern and testimony was offered in the public hearings in 2010, both in the context of the zoning classification and in broader concerns related to the residential neighborhood. Shelter Corporation responded to these concerns by noting how much parking in excess of code they were planning on. Now these parking plans have changed, and neighbors are entitled to fully and completely understand how the parking requirements are determined, the underlying basis for the numbers presented by Shelter Corporation, the assumptions built into the parking requirement numbers (i.e. 1 spot for every 4 residents, but Shelter has stated that they will limit residency to 169. How will this be enforced? b. What about visitors? Shelter Corp. said 10 — 20 people visiting at a time, and what about employees parking? As stated in the development application, 30 to 40 employees will be driving to the location at any given time. How does this impact the parking calculation? c. Parking — the reduction in parking is a concern. They are reducing parking by 40 %, and 4% of areas earmarked for parking reduction; cutting out 39 total parking spots, "36 of the 90 underground parking, of the 73 surface spaces, 3 would be lost ". Just as a reminder, the Developer requested PRD -5 (convalescent and nursing home)due to not being able to qualify for PSR since PSR required more parking. PSR is the zoning classification that all other assisted living places in Edina are zoned. If you recall, the reason PRD- 5 was selected because the Development would not qualify for the PSR zoning classification. The Water's project is not a convalescent and nursing home as defined by code. d. There is no public transportation in this residential area so more vehicles will be brought to this area with parking demands. It appears that Shelter properties are built only in Commercial areas and the commercial areas may be able to absorb the additional parking needs. Every parking space really matters in this residential area. e. Countryside Park is expected to be upgraded, and will draw more people, which means more parking. We already have parking issues around the park. Refer to the recent Police Reports to see the problems. Some person attended a game parked in a homeowner's driveway. This compromises the safety of the homeowner's family if they had a medical emergency, not to mention that people are taking the liberty to park on private property. Once the building is built it will be too late to take a closer look at these questions. What is there isn't enough parking, is the neighborhood now going to have to deal with an above ground parking ramp in their residential neighborhood? g. It would also seem that a change that reduces parking to the extent stated cannot be considered minor. If this project fails, and the building needs to "reinvented" — most likely as a condo or apartment building — the lack of covered parking will be a problem. h. There are pictures attached on Colonial Way, double parking from people attending the Colonial Church Events, the proposed street of the Waters. And on Olinger Blvd and on Hillside Ave, east of Countryside residential streets, showing existing parking concerns in the area. Pictures of Existing Parking Concerns in the Area olonial Church Parking Issues More traffic on Hillside Traffic on Olinger Blvd ithin the last Year for their across from Countryside from the baseball game vents. Street Parking on both Park on June 12, 2011 in at Countryside ides of Colonial Way. What will the afternoon. Park June 12,2011 in the afternoon( Just a s look like with the Waters too? note that it is like this every weekend and a lot ee concerns in number 7b below. Please check the Police of times during the Reports for concerns. week) Please check the Police Reports. 5. Is the Parking Underground or Enclosed Parking at Grade Level? The Change Request Application states that there were "90 underground parking spaces ". In the Watershed Application, Shelter states that the parking is enclosed at grade. What is it? That is an entire story difference? What is the true height of this building from the ground of where residential neighbors will see? 6. Public Safety Regarding the Flooding of the Parking Lot: There is one thing that the Water District (WD) does not address in their rules relating to inundation of parking areas. The WD leaves those issues to the City or the facility owner /management. It has been verified by an expert hydrologist with Kevin Bigalke that the WD rules do not regulate the flooding of parking areas. Therefore, the issue would seem most appropriate for the City to address from a public safety standpoint. Part of the parking area (15 or so parking spots) could be inundated with up to two feet of water during the 100 year event (26% chance of occurring in any given year). It was pointed out with the more intense weather; the 26% could be even higher in any given year. Without some adequate precautions or emergency measures in place an individual could be at greater risk of falling in the flood water and not be able to get back up or potentially drive their car off the parking area into deeper water. This is maybe more important with elderly residents. These determinations were provided by an Expert Hydrologist that we can provide to the City. This is not only a public safety issue, when this happens we lose another 15 or so parking in the area. How will the City handle this to make sure that public safety is not an issue? 7. Other Potential City Risks and Questions. It is recommended that at Risk Mitigation Plan be established. a. What happens if there is not enough parking after all? How will the City handle this? There is no other land to build extra lots on. As mentioned above, will the residential neighborhood have to be concerned about high -rise parking ramps? b. Change Church Zoning Ordinance for Parking: As was raised before: The City of Edina is tolerating this zoning classification difference (PRD -5 convalescent nursing home, and PSR (every other assisted living in Edina are coded PSR) because they acknowledge that the zoning code is outdated. They should equally acknowledge that the parking requirements for churches [1 parking stall for every 3 seats in the main sanctuary] is every bit as much out -of -date. That ordinance was created in an era when churches did not regularly sponsor large events and did not often hold concurrent activity events. These multiple events leave the parking inadequate at many of the city's churches. Major events 5 [funerals, et al] already use the soon- to -be- vacated south parking lot, both sides of Colonial Way and on the streets such as Olinger Boulevard. The overflow can only get worse. We'll predict that the new ordinance will require more than a 1 to 3 ratio' of parking stalls to sanctuary seats - perhaps a 1 to 2 ratio' can be speculated. Please see the picture above. And when these events happen they also pour into parking on all other nearby streets. c. Another Traffic Study is being requested now by the residents in the area. One where input from the residents "on the ground can participate." It is a year later, and more is known. Let's get an accurate traffic study as many residents personally believe that the traffic will be heavier than anticipated by the developer. Will taxpayers be required to pay for additional infrastructure if needed? Or will the Developer and Church be expected to pay these expenses? I respectfully ask that each of you enforce the laws and rules of this great community. ask you to maintain our property values for all of us, not just businesses. Sincerely, Donna G. Callender 5415 Couno yside Road Edina, AN 55436 9529209344 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 16, 201111:25 AM To: Cary Teague; Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: FW: Shelter /Colonial Water's Project Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno @ci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Bridget.Baird [mailto: Bridget. Baird@target.com] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 201111:23 AM To: Lynette Biunno; jhoviand @krausehovland.com; mbrindle @comcast.net; swensonannl @gmail.com; joshs @cbburnet.com; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; cteaaue @ci.edina.mn.us; ihooaanakker @ci.edina.mn.us. Cc: Bridget.Baird Subject: Shelter /Colonial Water's Project Dear Mayor Hovland, and City Council Members Ann Swenson, Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, and Josh Sprague, Please VOTE THAT THE PROPOSED SHELTER /COLONIAL WATER's PROJECT CHANGES (reducing 39 parking spaces, and reducing common space by 28 feet, since changing the mass) ARE REQUIRED BY ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE A PUBLIC HEARING IN FRONT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL, AND THESE CHANGES ARE MAJOR CHANGES THAT SHOULD REQUIRE THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS. The reasons the changes are major are listed below. 1. The ordinance is clear — any change in mass should go through the full public hearing process. Period. City Council should enforce the City ordinance. If one reviews Edina Ordinance 850.04, Subd. 3 (1), reproduced below, you will not see how a reduction of the proposed building by 28 feet can be considered a "minor change ". The plain wording of the ordinance states that any proposed change affecting "building coverage" or "mass" "shall be acted on, reviewed and processed by the Commission and Council in the same manner as they reviewed and processed the site plan." 2. This project is major - $30 million and 2 football fields long — and any change to it except maybe interior paint color or carpet color should be fully vetted. The project is not scheduled to break ground until spring 2012, so let's take the time to fully consider what these changes mean, all the possible impacts these changes may have on the project and the surrounding neighborhood and not rush to solely have the City Council vote on without the public hearing process, including a hearing in front of the Planning Commission too. 3. Shrinking Common Areas by 28 feet is Major: We should really know at a detail level what common areas are shrinking. Shrinking of a certain type of common areas could impact traffic, noise, etc. Again, there is nothing small about a $30 million project. "Reduction of common spaces" is really all encompassing. Reducing of commons spaces can have impact on the number of additional trips that may need to be made. More time needs to be taken to understand these impacts. 4. Cutting 39 parking spaces is Major in this Residential Area. a. Parking was raised several times by neighbors as a concern and testimony was offered in the public hearings in 2010, both in the context of the zoning classification and in broader concerns related to the residential neighborhood. Shelter Corporation responded to these concerns by noting how much parking in excess of code they were planning on. Now these parking plans have changed, and neighbors are entitled to fully and completely understand how the parking requirements are determined, the underlying basis for the numbers presented by Shelter Corporation, the assumptions built into the parking requirement numbers (i.e. 1 spot for every 4 residents, but Shelter has stated that they will limit residency to 169. How will this be enforced? b. What about visitors? Shelter Corp. said 10 — 20 people visiting at a time, and what about employees parking? As stated in the development application, 30 to 40 employees will be driving to the location at any given time. How does this impact the parking calculation? c. Parking —the reduction in parking is a concern. They are reducing parking by 40 %, and 4% of areas earmarked for parking reduction; cutting out 39 total parking spots, "36 of the 90 underground parking, of the 73 surface spaces, 3 would be lost ". Just as a reminder, the Developer requested PRD -5 (convalescent and nursing home)due to not being able to qualify for P5R since PSR required more parking. PSR is the zoning classification that all other assisted living places in Edina are zoned. If you recall, the reason PRD- 5 was selected because the Development would not qualify for the PSR zoning classification. The Water's project is not a convalescent and nursing home as defined by code. d. There is no public transportation in this residential area so more vehicles will be brought to this area with parking demands. It appears that Shelter properties are built only in Commercial areas and the commercial areas may be able to absorb the additional parking needs. Every parking space really matters in this residential. area. e. Countryside Park is expected to be upgraded, and will draw more people, which means more parking. We already have parking issues around the park. Refer to the recent Police Reports to see the problems. Some person attended a game parked in a homeowner's driveway. This compromises the safety of the homeowner's family if they had a medical emergency, not to mention that people are taking the liberty to park on private property. f. Once the building is built it will be too late to take a closer look at these questions. What if there isn't enough parking, is the neighborhood now going to have to deal with an above ground parking ramp in their residential neighborhood? g. It would also seem that a change that reduces parking to the extent stated cannot be considered minor. If this project fails, and the building needs to "reinvented" — most likely as a condo or apartment building — the lack of covered 'parking will be a problem. h. There are pictures attached on Colonial Way, double parking from people attending the Colonial Church Events, the proposed street of the Waters. And on Olinger Blvd and on Hillside Ave, east of Countryside residential streets, showing existing parking concerns in the area. Pictures of Existing Parking Concerns in the Area Fas_ .r olonial Church Parking Issues More traffic on Hillside Traffic on Olinger Blvd ithin the last Year for their across from Countryside from the baseball game vents. Street Parking on both Park on June 12, 2011 in at Countryside ides of Colonial Way. What will the afternoon. Park June 12,2011 in the afternoon(Just a his look like with the Waters too? Please check the Police note that it is like this Reports for concerns. every weekend and a lot of times during the ee concerns in number 7b week) elow. Please check the Police Reports. 5. Is the Parking Underground or Enclosed Parking at Grade Level? The Change Request Application states that there were "90 underground parking spaces ". In the Watershed Application, Shelter states that the parking is enclosed at grade. What is it? That is an entirely different story. What is the true height of this building from the ground of where residential neighbors will see? 6. Public Safety Regarding the Flooding of the Parking Lot: There is one thing that the Water District (WD) does not address in their rules relating to inundation of parking areas. The WD leaves those issues to the City or the facility owner /management. It has been verified by an expert hydrologist with Kevin Bigalke that the WD rules do not regulate the flooding of parking areas. Therefore, the issue would seem most appropriate for the City to address from a public safety standpoint. Part of the parking area (15 or so parking spots) could be inundated with up to two feet of water during the 100 year event (26% chance of occurring in any given year). It was pointed out with the more intense weather; the 26% could be even higher in any given year. Without some adequate precautions or emergency measures in place an individual could be at greater risk of falling in the flood water and not be able to get back up or potentially drive their car off the parking area into deeper water. This is maybe more important with elderly residents. These determinations were provided by an Expert Hydrologist that we can provide to the City. This is not only a public safety issue, when this happens we lose another 15 or so parking in the area. How will the City handle this to make sure that public safety is not an issue? 7. Other Potential City Risks and Questions. It is recommended that a Risk Mitigation Plan be established. a. What happens if there is not enough parking after all? How will the City handle this? There is no other land to build extra lots on. As mentioned above, will the residential neighborhood have to be concerned about high -rise parking ramps? b. Change Church Zoning Ordinance for Parking: As was raised before: The City of Edina is tolerating this zoning classification difference (PRD -5 convalescent nursing home, and PSR (every other assisted living in Edina are coded PSR) because they acknowledge that the zoning code is outdated. They should equally acknowledge that the parking requirements for churches [1 parking stall for every 3 seats in the main sanctuary] is every bit as much out -of -date. That ordinance was created in an era when churches did not regularly sponsor large events and did not often hold concurrent activity events. These multiple events leave the parking inadequate at many of the city's churches. Major events [funerals, et al] already use the soon- to -be- vacated south parking lot, both sides of Colonial Way and on the streets such as Olinger Boulevard. The overflow can only get worse. We'll predict that the new ordinance will require more than a 1 to 3 ratio of parking stalls to sanctuary seats - perhaps a 1 to 2 ratio can be speculated. Please see the picture above. And when these events happen they also pour into parking on all other nearby streets. c. Another Traffic Study is being requested now by the residents in the area. One where input from the residents "on the ground can participate." It is a year later, and more is known. Let's get an accurate traffic study as many residents personally believe that the traffic will be heavier than anticipated by the developer. Will taxpayers be required to pay for additional infrastructure if needed? Or will the Developer and Church be expected to pay these expenses? Jackie Hoogenakker From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 16, 201111:11 AM To: Cary Teague; Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: FW: Proposed change to Water's Senior Housing Development Lynette Biunno, Receptionist a 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 " 1'! Ibiunno0ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families 6z Doing Business From: Christine Henninger [mailto: Christine .Henninger @genmills.com] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 11:04 AM To: Lynette Biunno; jhoviand @krausehoviand.com; 'Joni Bennett'; swensonannl @gmail.com; joshs @cbburnet.com; Mary Brindle Subject: Proposed change to Water's Senior Housing Development Dear Mayor Hovland, Edina City Council Members, I respectfully request that you vote to treat the proposed changes to the Living Waters senior housing development plan as major changes, and require that the proposal be fully vetted via public hearings at the Planning Commission and the City Council. The proposed changes in the development plan will change the total mass of the building, and by city ordinance are required to be treated as major changes. In addition, this project is clearly a major project in the City of Edina. It's been the subject of much discussion and debate, and any change to the existing plan which will impact parking may poteritially have far - reaching ramifications, but if the changes are treated as minor, these potential impacts may not be considered or realized until the property is built and fully occupied and then it is too late. Thank you for your consideration. Christine Henninger 5816 Jeff Place Edina 952 - 920 -1931 (h) 763 - 293- 3734(w) Cary Teague From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 16, 20118:48 AM To: Cary Teague; Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: FW: Shelter Colonial Church Assisted Living Project Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(fti.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: burton shatter [mailto:bbshacter @comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 20117:57 AM To: Lynette Biunno; jhovland @krausehovland.com; mbrindle @comcast.net; swensonannl @gmail.com; joshs @cbburnet.com; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; cteaaue @ci.edina.mn.us; 'and' Subject: FW: Shelter Colonial Church Assisted Living Project Pardon my error. It should read PSD From: burton shacter [mailto:bbshacter @comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 20117:55 AM To: 'edinamail @ci.edina.mn.us'; 'm brind le@comcast. net'; 'swensonannl @gmail.com'; 'joshs @cbburnet.com'; 'jonibennettl2 @comcast.net'; 'cteaaue @ci.edina.mn.us'; 'and' Subject: Shelter Colonial Church Assisted Living Project I am a retired architect and resident of Edina. I have followed this project from its inception thru Council approval. I wish to say I have never supported the project but for no other reason than it was a misuse of our Zoning Codes to implement a favored development. The approval of the use of PRD -5 which is clearly intended for Convalescent Nursing or Rest Homes does not fit the intended use of this building. It is clearly 80 %apartment building and 20% nursing home style units (care). It was given to the developer because the most logical Zoning category PSD (Senior Citizens Residential) "was too restrictive" requiring significantly more parking not currently provided. Since there is nothing in the approval of the current project that restricts what age the developer may rent to they may rent to anyone of any age they choose if the market demands it. Doing so will put added automobile visits to the site. I am not suggesting that the Council go back to the beginning but I do ask that the parking that was approved is maintained and that no reductions are allowed. It is also clear to me that it is necessary for the Council to initiate an independent review and update our Zoning Codes to meet the needs of today's development projects rather than manipulate the Codes when deem desirable. Cary Teague From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 16, 20118:43 AM To: Cary Teague; Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: FW: Shelter Corp /Colonial Church Project Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno @ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Larry Kerzner [mailto:lkerznerl @comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 201110:00 PM To: Lynette Biunno; jhovland @krausehovland.com; mbrindle @comcast.net; swensonannl @gmail.com; joshs @cbburnet.com; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; cteaaue @ci.edina.mn.us; ihooaanakker @ci.edina.mn.us Subject: Shelter Corp /Colonial Church Project Dear Mayor Hovland and Edina City Councilors, I write to strongly urge a full public hearing and review by the Edina Planning Commission and City Council of the proposed changes to the previously approved Shelter Corp project. Sincerely, Lawrence J. Kerzner 5828 Jeff Place Edina, MN 55436 Cary Teague From: Sasha Pimkine <apimkine @hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, June 13, 201110:24 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Waters Senior Housing - Width Reduction Dear Cary, The proposed change to reduce the width of the approved Waters Senior Housing seem to be minor and, in my opinion, should not require formal review and public hearing at the Planning Commission and City Council. Best Regards, Alexandre Pimkine 6201 Tracy Ave, Edina, MN 55436 Cary Teague =rom: bobermeyer <bobermeyer @aol.com> Sent: Monday, June 13, 20116:16 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Waters Senior Housing City of Edina- Because this has been a controversial project, any changes made must be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission and the City Council. Thank you, Lisa Obermeyer 5817 Jeff Place Cary Teague From: Brice Martinson <bricem @concordres.com> Sent: Monday, June 13, 20111:37 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Waters Senior Housing - Proposed Change As a nearby property owner, I have no problem with the proposed change. I await the project's completion, as it may be a good place for my parents to reside. bYGGe MR ti,k l.son bricem(a)concordres.com (952) 926 -1436 6100 Ridgeway Road Edina, MN, 55436 1 Cary Teague :rom: Lynette Biunno Sent: Monday, June 13, 20119:00 AM To: Scott Neal; Cary Teague Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Cary Teague. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Susan [mailto :spetersen55436 @ gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 13, 20115:48 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Fw: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) - - - -- Original Message - - - -- From: "Mail Delivery Subsystem" <mailer- daemon @googlemail.com> To: <spetersen55436 @gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, June 12, 20119:15 PM Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: edinamail @ci.deina.mn.us Technical details of permanent failure: DNS Error: Domain name not found Original message - - - -- Received: by 10.231.210.148 with SMTP id gk20mr5197379ibb .110.1307931354993; Sun, 12 Jun 201119:15:54 -0700 (PDT) Return -Path: <spetersen55436 @smail.com> Received: from susanPC (174- 20- 85 -67.m pis. g west. net [174.20.85.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v15sm2572745ibh .45.2011.06.12.19.15.53 (version =SSLv3 cipher = OTHER); Sun, 12 Jun 201119:15:54 -0700 (PDT) Message -ID: < ABD563DC1EE24E81ABF993EA5166FD06 @susanPC> From: "Susan" <spetersen55436 @gmail.com> To: <edinamail @ci.deina.mn.us> Subject: shelter corporation Date: Sun, 12 Jun 201121:15:42 -0500 MIME - Version: 1.0 Content -Type: multipart/alternative; boundary= "----= _NextPa rt_000_OOAB_01CC2945. E347FD90" X- Priority: 3 X- MSMail- Priority: Normal X- Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18416 X- MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18612 Mayor Hovland,City Council,Scott Neal and Gary Teague, I was at the city council meeting regarding the shelter corporation / Colonial Church Project. I havent receive the letter as promised to be mailed two days after the City Council Meeting. I understand it takes time, but it is not leaving residents much time to respond whether they feel the change is Major or Minor proposed by Shelter Corporation. As a result, I ask that you reschedule the City Council Meeting from June 22nd until July 6th to vote on whether this change is Major or Minor so there is enought time for resident's to weigh in. As you know there is nothing minor about a $30 million plus project. We also would like to request that we are able to have a representative be able to speak at this meeting for 5 minutes in our behalf to clarify our concerns. Mr Jensen got to speak to City Council and we would also like to see that the impacted neighborhood (property tax payers)get their chance. Thankyou Susan Petersen Cary Teague -rom: Deb Mangen Sent: Friday, June 10, 20114:12 PM To: Scott Neal; Susan Howl; Cary Teague; Ann Swenson (swensonannl @gmail.com); JHovland @krauserollins.com; Joni Bennett Oonibennettl2 @comcast.net); josh @joshsprague.com; Mary Brindle Subject: FW: Resident Comment Debra Mangen, MMC, City Clerk ' 8 Fti 952 - 826 -0408 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0390 DMangen- ci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Sprague, Joshua S [mailto:joshs @cbburnet.com] Sent: Friday, June 10, 20113:18 PM To: Deb Mangen Subject: Resident Comment Please forward to council.. From: Susan Lee Sent: Thu, Jun 9, 2011 2:58 AM To: "joshs @cbburnet.com" Subject: Minor Versus Major Hi Josh! I was in China last week and so I missed your phone call! I haven't further pursued my concept for a learning center, mostly due to lack of time. Where does it go? Thank you for your emailed City Council summaries. Sending out a copy of the Code 850.04 ordinance was very helpful. I watched the 6/7 televised portion and your responses were thoughtful and to the point. Per your request, I will be providing the following email feedback to the Council in regards to the Waters Senior project: 1 understand residents' concern about this project, but the project has met the planning and City Council requirements to date, and at some point, the City of Edina should offer up some spirit of collaboration to developers and businesses who choose to invest in our city. What this developer is asking seems to be a very minor change. 1 find it difficult to consider it otherwise. Yes, the developer could have expected the gauntlet from the neighborhood had the building been increased in size, or additional parking spots added, but he is requesting a downsizing! The reason for downsizing will benefit Edina, not the developer. As an architect, it is my experience that no developer chooses to add affordable housing - it simply isn't cost effective. Hence, the reason government agencies will offer financing incentives in hopes of encouraging developers to include these unit types. Usually when we architects and planners talk about an impact to the site plan, it means the addition or removal or change to a major site element (building, roads, parking lots, landscaping). The proposed changes in no way impact the original site plan. Thanks, - -Sue Jackie Hoogenakker From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 16, 20111:10 PM To: Cary Teague; Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Shelter /Colonial change proposal ;:rte Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(W- ci.edina.mn.us I www.CltvofEdina.com - ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Burrisjo @aol.com [mailto:Burrisjo @aol.com] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 11:38 AM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: jhovland @krausehovland.com; mbrindle @comcast.net; swensonannl @gmail.com; joshs @bburnet.com; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; cteaaue @c:Ledina.mn.us; ihooaanakker @ci.edina.mn.us Subject: Shelter /Colonial change proposal City Council: Please vote that the proposed Shelter /Colonial Water's changes are required by ordinance to provide a public hearing in front of the Edina Planning Commission and Edina City Council. These changes are major changes that should require the same public hearing process as the original proposals. Thank you. Joanne O. Burris 5832 Olinger Blvd. Edina MN 55436 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 16, 20111:18 PM To: Cary Teague; Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Shelter Corp project Importance: High Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Cary Teague and Jackie Hoogenakker. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist P , 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 �;� IbiunnoQci.edina.mn.us 1 www.CityofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families Doing Business From: Kerzner, Dorothy M [ mailto :dorkerzner @edina.kl2.mn.us] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:40 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Shelter Corp project Importance: High June 16, 2011 Dear Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council: After meeting with Jay Jenson and Greg Anderson at Colonial Church two weeks ago it is my opinion that the changes proposed by Shelter Corp are not minor and the project deserves a full review by the Planning Commission and the City Council. There are ramifications to the changes being proposed and I feel the City of Edina will be doing a disservice to residents if a review is not completed. Thank you for your consideration. Dorothy Kerzner 5828 Jeff Place Edina i Cary Teague From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 16, 20112:43 PM To: Cary Teague; Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Colonial Shelter Lynette Biunno, Receptionist r 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(a d.edina.mmus www.CitvofEdina.com 5 I ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: John St. Pierre [ mailto:jstplerre6005 @gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 20112:34 PM To: Lynette Biunno; jhovland @krausehovland.com; mbrindle @comcast.net; swensonannl @gmail.com; joshs @cbburnet.com; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; cteaaue @ci.edina.mn.us; "'and "' Subject: Colonial Shelter My wife and I request that the changes to the Waters Development require the public hearing with the Planning Commission. It has been my personal experience working in the architectural /engineering profession that apparently minor changes can and often do create unexpected results. It is also apparent that previous city councils had similar experiences and planned for this contingency in the writing of Section 850.04 of the zoning code. Please defer to your predecessors advice and vote not to proceed with the revised design until it has been properly reviewed. Respectfully, John & Jeanne St. Pierre 6005 Arbour Lane Edina, MN 55436 (952) 929 -0175 istpierre6005 @gmail.com Cary Teague From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 16, 20112:54 PM To: Cary Teague; Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Lynette Biunno, Receptionist f ; r 1 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 I r IbiunnoCfci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Jed Jenkins [mailto:]Jenkins @revera.com] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 20112:51 PM To: Lynette Biunno; jhoviand @krausehovland.com; mbrindle @comcast.net; swensonannl @gmail.com; joshs @cbburnet.com; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; cteaaue @ci.edina.mn.us; ihooaanakker @ci.edina.mn.us Subject: Honorable Mayor and Respected Council Members: This email is in regards to the proposed Shelter Corp. Waters Senior Housing project changes. We live at 5708 Olinger Blvd, so are directly across Countryside Park from the site of this project. We were among the many residents who were opposed to this development project to begin with, for a variety of reasons. While we understand that we will not agree with every decision the City makes, we do feel that it is important for the City to follow the review and approval process as defined. It is our understanding that any change in the mass or footprint of a development is not considered "minor" and must go through the full Planning Committee and City Council review and approval process, which includes a public hearing. Therefore, the decision to be considered before the City Council on June 21St seems pretty straightforward. Since the proposed change involves both a change in mass and a change in footprint, it should be required to go through the full review and approval process. Independent of the procedural point noted above, we are very opposed to the proposed changes due to the loss of ANY parking spaces associated with this development. We feel that the zoning classification (and by extension the parking requirements) for this project was incorrectly established at the beginning. There is an established precedence that assisted living facilities within Edina are zoned PSR. Given the definition of this zoning classification, this seems appropriate for the distribution of ages and physical ability of residents of this type of facility. However, it is our understanding that the proposed development site could not support the level of parking required by the PSR classification and therefore it was requested that this development be classified as PRD, which has a much less restrictive parking requirement. However, this classification neither agrees with the established classification of the other assisted living facilities within Edina, nor seems appropriate for the distribution of ages and physical ability of residents of this type of facility. We feel there will be a parking issue associated with this facility, even with the parking defined in the original proposal. As a procedural note, letting the parking requirement dictate the zoning classification, rather than the zoning classification dictate the parking requirements seems like the "tail wagging the dog" and we are quite disturbed by this. Given that the zoning classification and original plan was approved by the City Council, we understand that it may be difficult to revisit this issue at this time. However, what can be done at this time is require the proposed changes to go through the full review and approval process. During this process, we would request that any loss of parking should be viewed very critically. Thank you in advance for your attention in this matter. Jed Jenkins Cindy Jenkins Cary Teague From: Jed Jenkins <JJenkins @revera.com> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 20113:14 PM To: Cary Teague; Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Water Senior Housing This submission was originally reject as I used the email addresses provided by our neighborhood group. However, I then used the email address for Jackie that was in the letter we received from the city. However, please note that the email address for Jackie in the letter we received from the city was also incorrect, therefore my email submission was rejected again. By the time I went to the city website and found the correct address it is now a few minutes after the 3:OOpm deadline for submission. However, I would still request that this letter be part of the Council packet as I feel this was an error beyond my control. Jed Jenkins From: Jed Jenkins Sent: Thursday, June 16, 20112:51 PM To: 'edinamail @ci.edina.mn.us'; 'jhovland @krausehovland.com'; 'mbrindle @comcast.net'; 'swensonannl @gmail.com'; Joshs @cbburnet.com'; 'jonibennettl2 @comcast.net'; 'cteaaue @ci.edina.mn.us'; 'ihooaanakker @ci.edina.mn.us' Subject: Honorable Mayor and Respected Council Members: This email is in regards to the proposed Shelter Corp. Waters Senior Housing project changes. We live at 5708 Olinger Blvd, so are directly across Countryside Park from the site of this project. We were among the many residents who were opposed to this development project to begin with, for a variety of reasons. While we understand that we will not agree with every decision the City makes, we do feel that it is important for the City to follow the review and approval process as defined. It is our understanding that any change in the mass or footprint of a development is not considered "minor" and must go through the full Planning Committee and City Council review and approval process, which includes a public hearing. Therefore, the decision to be considered before the City Council on June 215i seems pretty straightforward. Since the proposed change involves both a change in mass and a change in footprint, it should be required to go through the full review and approval process. Independent of the procedural point noted above, we are very opposed to the proposed changes due to the loss of ANY parking spaces associated with this development. We feel that the zoning classification (and by extension the parking requirements) for this project was incorrectly established at the beginning. There is an established precedence that assisted living facilities within Edina are zoned PSR. Given the definition of this zoning classification, this seems appropriate for the distribution of ages and physical ability of residents of this type of facility. However, it is our understanding that the proposed development site could not support the level of parking required by the PSR classification and therefore it was requested that this development be classified as PRD, which has a much less restrictive parking requirement. However, this classification neither agrees with the established classification of the other assisted living facilities within Edina, nor seems appropriate for the distribution of ages and physical ability of residents of this type of facility. We feel there will be a parking issue associated with this facility, even with the parking defined in the original proposal. As a procedural note, letting the parking requirement dictate the zoning classification, rather than the zoning classification dictate the parking requirements seems like the "tail wagging the dog" and we are quite disturbed by this. Given that the zoning classification and original plan was approved by the City. Council, we understand that it may be difficult to revisit this issue at this time. However, what can be done at this time is require the proposed changes to go through the full review and approval process. During this process, we would request that any loss of parking should be viewed very critically. Thank you in advance for your attention in this matter. Jed Jenkins Cindy Jenkins i7 I '[f k o a �\ "tea REPORURECOMMEN ®ATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. VI.B From: Cary Teague ❑ Action Planning Director Discussion Information Date: June 21, 2011 Subject: Sketch Plan Review, JMS Homes, 5020 & 5024 Indianola Avenue. Deadline No Deadline for a City Decision: ACTION REQUESTED: Discuss, review and provide informal comment and feedback on a proposed Sketch Plan. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: JMS Homes is proposing to tear down the existing single - family homes at 5020 and 5024 Indianola Avenue and build seven (7) detached homes over a 26,730 square foot area. Two lots currently used as parking for the adjacent church would also be included in the development. The proposed density would be 11 units per acre, which would require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from LDR, Low Density Residential to MDR, Medium Density Residential. Additionally, a rezoning of these sites from R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD, Planned Residential District would be required. Planning Commission Review: On June 1, 2011, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed Sketch Plan. (See the attached minutes for specific comments.) The following is a summary of some of their comments: • The Commission generally liked the concept of the proposed plan; however,- - there were concerns raised in regard to the specifics of this concept on this site. • Concern was raised over the proposed building coverage and drainage. The Watershed District should be engaged up front before the plans are further developed. • A suggestion was made to provide a sidewalk from the site, north to 50th Street. • Concern was raised over individual storage space, including storage for bikes. • Concern was raised over the new homes facing into the rear yards of the single - family homes to the south. • The site seems to lack depth to provide a good separation of uses. • Concern over the increase in density; re- zoning and re- guiding could potentially allow a greater density and height for this site. If this project were approved, it really contemplates medium density from this site north to 50tH • Concern over the garage entrance coming off Indianola. A suggestion was made to have the entrance off Jay Place. • Concern was raised over the parking requirements for the existing church. The capacity of the church is 175; therefore, 58 parking stalls are required. The site currently contains 68 stalls. • It was recommended that JMS reach out to the neighborhood prior to any formal application being made. ATTACHMENTS: • Draft minutes from the June 1, 2011 Edina Planning Commission meeting • The June 1, 2011 Planning Commission Staff Report, including the proposed plans and narrative. Motion Commissioner Fischer moved approval of a 21.2 -foot front yard setback variances to build a new home. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. Commissioner Staunton asked for acceptance of an amendment to the motion adding to the findings that the lot coverage of the new home is less than 14 %, the building has been shifted and that there is only a width of 38 -feet between setbacks. Commissioner Fischer and Scherer accepted the amendment. All voted aye, motion carried. 10 -0. VII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS A. Sketch Plan Review — JMS — 5020 and 5024 Indianola Avenue Planner Aaker delivered a brief power point presentation outlining the sketch plan. Aaker pointed out the following: Applicant proposes to - • Build seven (7) detached homes over the four lot, 26,730 square foot area. • Underground parking for each of the units • Access from Indianola • Density would be 11 units per acre • Comprehensive Plan Amendment • Rezoning Chair Grabiel noted that the sketch plan appears similar to the townhouses built on France Avenue. Planner Aaker agreed, adding that there are similarities and differences, both abutting residential (R -1) properties; however, the townhouses on France Avenue are consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Platteter asked Planner Aaker if Jay Place was a public road. Planner Aaker responded in the affirmative; acknowledging that it functions more like an alley. Commissioner Fischer asked if any consideration was given to a PUD process. Planner Aaker responded that was a thought by the applicant; however, Edina's code prohibits a PUD development in the R -1 Zoning District. Page 4 of 8 Appearing for the Applicant Jeff Schoenwetter, applicant and Kathy Alexander, architect. Applicant Presentation Jeff Schoenwetter gave the Commission a brief overview of his past projects. Schoenwetter told the Commission the proposed project would be called 'Bishops Walk ". Schoenwetter delivered a power point presentation highlighting aspects of the sketch plan proposal for seven (7) detached homes as follows: • The proposal is in response to the market for smaller homes close to amenities • All homes are 1, 1 '/z or 2 -story design. Shorter elevation than surrounding structures. • Transitional ergonomics • Transitional Zoning • Pedestrian life style. De- emphasizing the automobile. • Green roof design; natural green grass planted upon the roof of parking garage • Private patios • Photocell controlled illumination • Development will have a Home Owners Association (HOA). • PRD or PSR Zoning. Schoenwetter explained they are very receptive to a PSR zoning. • Units will be owned not rented. With graphics Schoenwetter highlighted renderings of the proposal and the impact of the proposal from south, north, east and west. In conclusion Schoenwetter said in his opinion Bishops Walk is a good example of creativity. Schoenwetter pointed out this was an "infill" site and any redevelopment of these sites needs to be done with sensitivity to the surrounding neighborhood. Concluding, Schoenwetter said the proposed homes would not be large -with footprints between 900 and 1200 square feet. Schoenwetter asked the Commission to note that if the site were rezoned to PSR a 2- bedroom limit was attached to that zoning classification. Kathy Alexander told the Commission she is very excited to be part of this project adding the proposal addresses the current demands of the market place and in her opinion would be a great addition to Edina. Discussion The following questions, comments and concerns were raised by Commissioners: • The Commission questioned parking for the church? Planner Aaker said that church parking is non - conforming and will continue to be non - conforming. The proposal will not alter that fact. It was also noted as previously presented that this project includes "shared" parking with the church. Page 5 of 8 The Commission asked if the City's parking requirements are met for this proposal alone. Planner Aaker responded in the affirmative. Mr. Schoenwetter also addressed this question and stated if the proposal was approved there would be no net loss of parking. Expanding on the question Schoenwetter said the plan indicates 2+ parking spaces per unit, adding they are working toward providing 3 parking spaces per unit. Schoenwetter noted that if the proposal was rezoned to a PSR zoning classification the parking provided would be twice the PSR parking requirement. The Commission asked what separates the proposed homes from the church parking lot. Schoenwetter said the north sides of the homes are considered the rear yard and a maintenance free fence will separate the rear yard of the homes from the new church parking spaces that will run east and west along the northern border of the site. The Commission asked Mr. Schoenwetter for clarification on the location of the private patios. Schoenwetter explained that the private patios will be positioned between each home. The patios would be similar in size to a deck. • The Commission asked for clarification on the "green roof' and hard cover. Mr. Schoenwetter said that the proposed "green roof' would handle run off; but acknowledged at a lesser rate than natural soil. The Commission questioned if the City's definition of "hard cover" includes or excludes the green roof, not on how much green space the site has, but on the capacity to hold water. Planner Aaker responded that the City's Ordinances do not address that difference. Aaker added that the project would need to obtain a permit from the watershed district before construction could begin. The Commission reiterated that Schoenwetter should look at run -off and seek watershed district input on the project. The Commission reiterated there is a difference between "manufactured" green space and natural green space. Schoenwetter said he also would be willing to engage an engineer knowledgeable on rain water management/green roof, etc. • The Commission suggested that sidewalk connections need to be implemented into the site and if this project was carried forward to look carefully at the possibility of providing those sidewalk connections. Continuing, the Commission noted if the site was marketed as walkable there needs to be connectedness to ensure less emphasis on the vehicle. Less emphasis on the vehicle was also important because if the project was approved there would be an increase in area traffic because of the increase in density. Mr. Schoenwetter agreed, adding he would be willing to look into finding a way to accomplish sidewalks. • The Commission questioned bike storage — Schoenwetter said each unit has garage and storage space below ground. • The Commission suggested flipping the homes so the proposed homes don't front the rear yard of the adjacent homes. Mr. Schoenwetter responded if the Commission wants that as a condition the reversal would be reviewed. Schoenwetter pointed out because this was a sketch plan review there was time to reevaluate the project. Concluding Schoenwetter said the original intent was to use the rear yards as a pedestrian corridor deemphasizing the church parking lot. • The Commission asked Mr. Schoenwetter if he ever considered fewer units. Mr. Schoenwetter said if he reduces the number of units the price of the units would Page 6 of 8 increase. The Commission asked the price points of the proposed homes. Mr. Schoenwetter said the price points of the new homes would roughly be in the 600- thousand range. Schoenwetter said there was also the potential for future growth, a possible Phase II, depending on what happens with the present church. • The Commission expressed some concern with lot depth — adding that the rear yard may need more "breathing room ". Ms. Alexander said when the project was designed they considered the rear yard as more of a side yard, adding in reality the side yard functions as the rear yard. • Consider flipping the entrance to the garages. The discussion continued with the Commission acknowledging the creative approach this project presents and that the location of the project is generally good; especially in relation to 50th and France and the potential to promote and encourage walkability. The Commission said there are many good parts to this proposal but also obstacles. Continuing the Commission pointed out that if this project proceeds a rezoning is required and the guide plan of the Comprehensive Plan would need to be amended to accommodate this type of land use; noting that's a "big deal ".. The Commission also pointed out that density could become an issue depending on the final zoning classification of the project. This project envisions a change in density that's in between PSR -PRD in a predominantly R -1 neighborhood. Schoenwetter said Edina has a unique zoning ordinance and if approved conditions could be placed on the project, adding Bishops' Walk could be considered transitional zoning between the commercial properties to the east and the surrounding R -1 properties. The Commission acknowledged the multiple zoning districts within the 50th and France area; however, indicated they what to keep their "eyes open" when considering projects that include rezoning and comprehensive guide changes. Concluding, the Commission noted that residents rely on the City's ordinances when purchasing a property, reiterating any changed would need to be carefully weighed. Schoenwetter said in his opinion, in reality this project could be considered a form of single family development. The discussion continued with the Commission reiterating there's a difference between PRD and PSR zoning classifications pointing out these districts have different requirements and density ratios. Mr. Schoenwetter said in his opinion the proposed homes will fit the neighborhood and would replace some very tired homes. He added he doesn't have a strong preference between the two proposed zoning classifications; however, believes this product would appeal to the "empty nester ". The Commission did agree that this was an attractive project for empty nesters because it provides them with a detached single family home with common underground garages. Continuing, the Commission acknowledged that the project makes sense and the concept is attractive; however, there will be many different opinions about the project and it is very important to engage the neighborhood in the process to assess their feelings. It was acknowledged by the Commission that the project was an attractive unique concept, which could benefit the community if done correctly and in the right place; however, they reiterated and underscored that amending the comprehensive guide plan and rezoning Page 7 of 8 the site is a change and given the City's recent history it is very important to reach out to the neighborhood before a formal application is submitted to the City. Chair Grabiel asked if anyone present would like to speak to this proposal; being none, Chair Grabiel thanked Mr. Schoenwetter for his presentation. Page 8 of 8 F4; O t e• nra MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission FROM: Cary Teague, Planning Director DATE: June 1, 2011 RE: 5020 & 5024 Indianola Avenue — Sketch Plan Review The Planning Commission is asked to consider a sketch plan proposal to redevelop the properties at 5020 and 5024 Indianola Avenue and two lots owned by Edina Covenant Church. (See property location on pages Al —A6.) JMS Homes is proposing to tear down the existing single - family homes and build seven (7) detached homes over the four lot, 26,730 square foot area. The applicant has expressed interest in providing one of the homes as an affordable housing unit per the Met Council guidelines. The homes would stretch from Indianola to Jay Place. There would be underground parking for each of the units, with access from Indianola Avenue. (See page A9.) The proposed density would be 11 units per acre, which would require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from LDR, Low Density Residential to MDR; Medium Density Residential. Additionally, a rezoning of these sites from R -1, Single Dwelling Unit District to PRD, Planned Residential District would be required. The following page shows a compliance table demonstrating how the proposed new building would comply with the PRD -3 Zoning Ordinance Standards. Please note that the proposal would require several variances. Compliance Table *Would not conform to Ordinance Standard of the PRD -3 District * *Would & does not conform to the Ordinance Standard of the R -1 District No church parking stalls would be lost as a result of the project. Twenty stalls would be removed, but 20 stalls would be replaced. While the proposal would be an improvement over the existing buildings on the site, and the provision of an affordable housing unit would be a benefit to the City, staff does have some concerns. This medium density residential development would be located adjacent to property zoned R -1 on all sides, and single family homes on three sides. The proposal for 11 units per acre is on the high end of the medium density residential range of 5 -12 units as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan. Staff is also concerned with the number of variances that would be necessary. 2 City Standard (PRD -3) Proposed Building Setbacks Front — Indianola Avenue 35 feet 22 feet* Side — South 20 feet 25 feet Side — North 20 feet 30 feet Rear — Jay Place 35 feet 20 feet* Drive -aisle & parking Lot Setbacks Front — Indianola Avenue 20 feet 6 feet* Side — South 10 feet 50+ feet Side — North 10 feet 0 feet* (shared parking proposed with the church)* Building Height Three Stories or 40 feet whichever is less Two stories & 30 +/- feet Building Coverage 30% 28% Lot Area Per Dwelling 3,400 with allowances for underground 3,800 square feet parking & quality construction Parking Stalls — Residential 2 enclosed stalls per unit 2 enclosed stalls per unit Parking Stall Size 8.5' x 18' 8.5 x 18' Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet Minimum acreage for a church 3 acres 1.1 acres (existing)** .81 acres (proposed)** *Would not conform to Ordinance Standard of the PRD -3 District * *Would & does not conform to the Ordinance Standard of the R -1 District No church parking stalls would be lost as a result of the project. Twenty stalls would be removed, but 20 stalls would be replaced. While the proposal would be an improvement over the existing buildings on the site, and the provision of an affordable housing unit would be a benefit to the City, staff does have some concerns. This medium density residential development would be located adjacent to property zoned R -1 on all sides, and single family homes on three sides. The proposal for 11 units per acre is on the high end of the medium density residential range of 5 -12 units as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan. Staff is also concerned with the number of variances that would be necessary. 2 City of Edina 48W ors I i, I 1r 41" sta � >. mu A �. Am wm:Qw SIM goo/ ata ass amt art o gam 5o0T soot sm5 ; am soft so17 5006 5007 :m so=+ 5000 5009 swn 5070 sort son soeo sox son 5011 3017 5026 SOq 3011 3075 son son sole 3017 51o+ 51o0 3011 5077 sox "to WIS MO slot 613rmw 51srsrw solo slot 5100 $log stos S+O1 5100 slw sra sn5 sru s/os sra .r�waus emr.ye�e..0osoems o 'en > o _ PID: 1802824410172 ,� ' 5020 Indianola Ave ;, Q Edina, MN 55424 r� �•% MurydwT L.W is LaI.3. _) z1v Liml. Cmeft O..,�. cow I- h} A Awl 4 City of Edina aYtx 4w — aYS' IL77 1Sac ' -7 x5111 =5a N-.& s1 "s Legend 49M I Fillttsa2 Wnnitel Lk is 0l11 illT atr.1' +!!� <OIDISTW $tleet Name laffiks aC8 1m6 asaz �s+6w I66f YM/ 19<5 X3,1 pJ71877 .°a1] J90t <../ Ci17 Limes AM AM .61 4. awsp 4m 4M3 i Lake Name `3°`" ago 4N6 sysN aN9s N Ot3 J!N M 3s+ •,, t Lafrs IOi7 24 A01 Iso6 <BY0 4mo elfl Parx6 IgT IUO< < A'!t ' QW �u Mss ** 31 31 q21 atwsrw Lanim3 I60 < f1m <N96 tlit Im26 1 <396' mt ues Ins9 r r n 15r a ".IM1S J a= =mac ^`. �� , M/1 40'6 1912 1sr SIt, — 49K IlyO r I/pP J YYl rlr2 N'1s �i Mxc'�:vxs: U a <91a �H 40o BD •1s6 110 w.;�.l.:'Ar�at.�_^- r- ��U+2+_I r: uY:',TtsvmC:cr_vr_.aG�cl 507NS7W h v�r 3Z' f <IfY •� <:T °-ak.. �U��1 4461 3002 SW7 30(Q Jim fMYllvf <r6• r/ MJf J➢fl 2< HI El 1ro;V _ c.. s.-e 3 .1 SOa6 SO°6 sms 1 0 pmt" —w - ..—C 1 sm 423" 30!/ 5077 2 SO7 30/6 $0N7 5m 3V �� xa ■ P=,29 - ___a!Fm Uesal pa.'/1 ;V Rax.�a Uax-_I sm SON/ sm N 5021 136- Y:TvmRC�t..a u�:1 300/ 5011 SOM 5617 SOTS 3000 1050 S0 ■ . pay S -VSSZm .a ]r-al 5010 3013 11ift 5013 50x SOJ1 3026 5029 5026 30 ■ 1t8a;4o -+.ss anrcr.� Umes I 5017 S0/S SOf1 SOt3 3Oa0 . fi1D- 5:'Vr_�R..w -. +a G�rrl MM W32 95a <:Ps -m sc -a: r'—..l 50/9 solo SOfI /' 3v« 5701 5100 3027 3016 a -1 Sc�cU `9�r_i 3°16° 50110 5o1f ■ a.zcoa,x9acc_ -gur_t 50113010 5027 5020 AlISP1► 5105 3161 37ST S7W 3101 5100 5101 ED �:�"' -ENO$ 0-1 S10f So7J Sf00 sin Sias 31°1 5100 '� Parcels sou 3103 s+a 5105 5025 Sim $113 5112 5103 3101 0 3027 500 s103 5109 sloe 3109 W32 S034 7056 S7� s16/ Sill Sim 3109 Sf0/ $115 St12 5113 1110 ,/ 31M 3111 C��1 !p $it/ S170 i S1iJ Sift �} 5117 Q 5116 S 3111 5112 Sa3a S03a 3710 3717 sits N siri s1N 5117 311/ 5331 q S1Tf S7f6 5170 5175 1111 5713 Will 3125 SiK Sf26 5121 3120 3721 ° 5113 3120 $120 Sf19 lw.n /ark S/U 5124 5121 5137 3125 $124 2< S7t7 3111 `2 $133 512° 5116 5119 5117 3136 5119 S1t/ 3137 $126 5117 5172 s7N0 ST W \1 �— �1 52°1 5100 5101 51011 uacoea. nMaN6 CW -.0 .A Wms 4107 4201 A, Mfr PID: 1802824410172 a � 5020 Indianola Ave Edina, MN 55424 ,.`; �• • 'J11 i<'" SF� • 4 r22a +9 T- 4m �7 5096 Sa� f N lOiV 5076 i — 1 5019 SOM 5015 5017 5109 5700 SQN 50:3 5105 slow 575137 M 5107 5700 slog 5109 slw 5171 5112 r. a. _. ✓.s �.: ms D ya 1. City of Edina 9s a 375M57a/ sl51AN sloe 5100 5105 slow PID:1802824410172 5020 Indianola Ave Edina, MN 55424 Tl 5101 5100 5705 slw d e :r y� Y�L� ll� tH 1.1+ Legend !ruse NyMbe7 Labels 21mm Name Latch Gy L— ft A/ inecks Leis Now mns Lai— Park. Zsning 99oo.9r.®Ncxcaoa!USr ¢ t lrtYS5.;1esv'J_reL-r�.aeUmrca+ Pr'..lY (NOea�e:ar_Mea J�IIrGt R:SL1iPa. -e=G CeT_s3Ja:+�1 P�91rPSstL"- -, .s USn�t ❑ FKJ (P _vt mxRrS 02rCt aPYJY!FSae�OlFa DSal ■ RtU -t ;Pa3aiRa�lrtu U6rct1 . PRO 2 :p— R.�verte Ds -�1 ■ Pim S;PSxm R�ec�tm D� I ■KCS <IPS -y R'SaC[ta USrrt ■ sR6- 5IPtr�cJ Rsicrtra US+Ct F+SRi;FasP9 �+o. -Or cl OR -t; — D--qu- ■ Uael ❑ RMU rR:7z +e Ycfm Omlydl EjPa Lelb 7 z� 3001 � � � � •`'i . � t l2t3 Mo � s 3013 R1AMA AVE i . 3017 Mpa- --MdHS c=rgs /C;LOm Gs2m5 ,k *� y, �• O .r m C I' IPP I, —? - T Topographic Exhibit for:: ' ' JMS CUSTOM HOMES, LLC 1 \\ _7 77 Y o 4- if \ 1\ I \ j - I T - \ - \ \ \ \ 1 \� - -\�- - \�5 FFE 1885:7 (Wecl Sian) j LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1,665 . / 73E5 3216— Xtp:dW9 i r. C ti Topographic Exhibit for:: JMS CUSTOM HOMES, LLC o if \ \ CHURCH. - \ \ \ \ 1 \� - -\�- - \�5 FFE 1885:7 (Wecl Sian) j LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 1,665 . / i r. Part of.STEVENS' 1ST ADDITION TO �\ MINNEAPOLIS and port or GLENWEVADDITION 'to _ TO EDINA, accordin :the recorded plate County, I thereof, Hennepin Minnesota.. ' _..:. I LLJ I 1- i i ..I ..I ..- . / ' - 4�,1 a,0 I ' • .. . i I BUILDING IEX. 106 = 1808.9 - _ - - -- - -- z: - • .Q EX GARAGE - �\ dd Slab =f866. EX BUILDING - TO 8��11888.7 _ a; PP I EX II GRAPHIC SCALE ,_ _ Toe = 1867.5 - 30 60 0 f5 i BUILDING - IN .FEET ' 1 I slub=te97.7I --karlson PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL - ENGINEERING - SURVEYING • ` I _ - - I - I 24B Apollo Dr, Suite 100, Uno,Lakes, MIN '55014 ' - Phone: 763 - 489 -7900 Fa.; 763-489-795-) C ti PROPOSED LAYOUT for "BISHOPS WALK" I l 1. : i - f jl II �! LEGAL DESCRIPTION: I_ �i A \/ 1 T ADDITION 70 Q' I x \ }, � Part MINNEAPOLIS and part o CLENNEW DITTO I I MINED A according to the recorded plats N ' � 70 IN a i f 26�.Sa ( I z thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. A-1 1 W NOTES: See Sheet 2 for Cross — Sections C Q O 1 . -. ... ..I ,.. ... -1.. _ - 1 +0� .... eP •�I rn �.a99sr ; ::- r;sea sF '� -'. R oegsr: .... SF _ 1 7 I78SF ti 1.128 g_ r 1,128' I , tGx Al y7 127- tl 228 SF I L Zs L -24 = 24 - ois • 1 „fig!' - _ i. t T _.. , 1 ,v 115.13 j •. - -. , I ,� � 163:03 _. I t t o. 60 1 �• I l� I � GRAPHIC SCALE 0 15 30 (IN FEET) T \ SITE DATA PARKING SUMMARY r; i CHURCH Stalls Lost: 20 1 Denotes Underground Parking Carlson Existing Area ±1.11 Ac. New Stalls: 20 Lv L +'c:':::�::`: Proposed Areo —±0.81 Ac. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HOUSING ENVI0.0NpEM� • ENGINEEIIING • SGRVEYItIG Proposed Area —±0.64 Ac. Gross Density- ±10.94 UnlislAc. 248 one: 63 489- 100, Fa lakes, NN 55014 Phone: 763 -q89 -7900 Fa ::763 -469 -7959 N a N U t IA SECTION A - A' SECTION B = B' (LOOKING WEST) (LOOKING WEST) 2ND LEVEL 2ND LEVEL LIVING SPACE LIVING SPACE 1 1ST LEVEL I 1ST LEVEL 1 LIVING SPACE LIVING SPACE 1 EL *88 ELI *888.5 EL EL 1866.5 EXISi1NG - -� - - 1 -- — - - - - - -- �CROUND — —, PROPOSED I � GRADE G EXISTING UNDERGROUND \ PROP GROUND I PARKING — GRAD II EL. *883.0 I ----- -41 - - - --- 1"--30' *e �) Carlson PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EIIVIPGNMENTM - ENGINEERING - SURVEYING 248 Apollo Dr, Sulte 100, Uno Lakes, MN 55014 Phone: 763 -489 -7900 Fax: 763 -489 -7959 365 3216- Sbo2.dwg Ap ev C,4 A0 T wiRR4rwE Bisfiqs Waik Narrative TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Overview Proximity Bishops Walk Open Space Bishops Walk's Home Owners Association (HOA) & Zoning Edina's Zoning Map Air Quality Water Quality Physical Safety and Mobility Conclusion Page 1 of 8 ` 1 1 Introduction Welcome to Bishops Walk. Bishops Walk is a pedestrian village nestled just off 50th and France. Bishops Walk is buffered Edina Covenant Church to its North, Northeast and offers the convenient pedestrian connectivity of 50th and France to its east. Unparalleled landscape flanks this lush GREEN by design community. The famed shopping district and renowned restaurants of Edina are literally walking distance. The newest of all JMS communities captures feelings of nature with "green" roof design; natural green grass is planted upon the roof. of the parking garage, while encompassing the modern convenience of under grade parking. The hospitality offered by life at Bishops Walk, in a new custom designed JMS home is unparalleled. The reason our clients elect to call JMS's Bishops Walk home is not the thoughtful craftsmanship or amenities within each JMS home, but the care, the character, the transitional ergonomics the community offers its residents. To most fully integrate the land plan and the homes offered, the design team at JMS created "the Bishops Walk collection ". A collection of all new home plans conceived for our client's enjoyment and complement Bishops Walk pedestrian life style. All homes feature design elements that address transitional housing needs. Elevators, wide doorways, ADA style spacious baths and other "aging in place" amenities. Most homes feature two bedrooms plus den. All homes will be either 1, 1'/2 or 2 story design. All homes are shorter in elevation than surrounding structures. Residents will celebrate the seasons of life within Bishops Walk. Page 2 of 8 A 13, Overview Bishops Walk will be a "relatively" affordable neighborhood. The smaller footprint homes fit right into the place and the prices respect the current market. The buyers at Bishops Walk consider the amenities of Edina vital to safe housing investment. Factors include schools, walking convenience, location, resale ease, etc. The perspective buyers will see and feel the energy of this viable and inviting neighborhood. Interestingly, the American Lives survey said buyers create a picture of how they make home buying decisions today. The survey reported that nearly 70% of respondents agreed; "I am willing -to .accept a smaller home and homesite to be in the neighborhood I want." Bishops Walk is in a prime location, attractive to "Edinaians ". Most of JMS's current buyers are choosing a blend of old house charm with modern building science. When purchasing a new home JMS helps its clients take a closer look at the value of green components. Most buyers today recognize the "real cost" of a home and factor in the cost of operation (utilities) and design to save energy bills. These features are commonly called the total investment. Consumers have learned the lessons that their homes may not be the wealth builders they were in the past. Because of the current need in our community, this is a time for builders and municipal leaders to create new normal in the new economy: Bishops Walk will be known as a place where a diversity of people at various life stages want to live, invest and be part of the Edina community. Proximity Bishops Walk features unique, well conceived planning details. At Bishops Walk we started from a builder's point of view. Bishops Walk is a well organized site, with thoughtful homesite geometry. The homes relate to the streets, night light facades (solar switched), articulation of setbacks, entrance orientation and scale, landscape features and general circulation throughout the neighborhood influenced all our design decisions. Deemphasizing the automobile and enticing the pedestrian approach to the street shape for the homes and land spaces focused efforts on efficient site design. Page 3of8 A(3 Bishops Walk Open Space Gathering places for area residents have been conceived to provide outdoor space for people to meet interact and relax. Public open spaces are easily accessible for walkers and bikers. The Bishops Walk plan incorporates safe, direct, convenient and visually attractive sidewalk access. Bishops Walk features seating areas with both sunny and shaded maintenance free park bench locations. Bishops Walk residents will in additional to "public" open space, have private patios, within each homes private "courtyard ". Creating truly unique outdoor "life touch" spaces. Community lighting — all home facades will create an attractive pedestrian environment as a result of building scale, orientation and entrance spacing with photocell controlled illumination in lieu of traditional street lights, creating low impact, very uniform, evening appeal. Bishops Walk promises to be a very comfortable pedestrian destination. Page 4 of 8 4/q Bishops Walk's Home Owners Association (1-10A)' & Zoning Our residents prefer the ease of living:. lifestyle at 501h and . France. The, walkways and connectivity are designed to promote all- season access as the Home Owners' Association (HOA) will be responsibly for snow, lawn and sidewalk maintenance, as well as maintaining the solar cell controlled 'lighting. The. HOA dues will include municipal sewer and water supplied- by the City of Ediri.a and CTV. The design.criteria correspond to these goals: r Edina's zoning code - PRD (PSR). Bishops Walk is a planned residential district. • Principal Use: Single dwelling units Single lot and block legal descriptions Garage (below grade) via cross easement • Accessory Uses: None Density: Lot area, exceeds square foot requirements with allowable credits for PRD or PSR zoning. Coverage Patios: The land area exceeding 24,000 square feet and the seven (7) homes averaging 950 square feet, (first floor living• space) the coverage is 6,650 /_ 23,000 consistent with the requirements, of all PSR 'and PRD requirements. Bishops Walk is approximately 72% green space (28% covered). - ® Transitional Zoning: Bishops Walk represents the perfect opportunity to transition from the R -1 access to the west and south, towards the PRD 4 (apartments and condos) to the northeast, all while being immediately adjacent to the church (similar to an old parsonage). Additional zoning flanking the north is duplexes and parking. Page 5of8 I�I� City of Edina q Lepend P6gi li"d Feature House Number Labels Street Warm Labels City Lj"ts Creeks Lake Names Lakes Parks Zoning APO iA.I...hU Pa*%v D:m a) MDD -A WI-d Dft.L -1 .n DbUk MDD- 5llAued Dsvloypr.l Dbuk MDD•slMbad Dndapnsnt Dark PCD -1 iPlsmsd Conwneci/ Dim PCO4J"mnd Ccm.sdd bid k PM-3IPlaMadCwms♦cva D mzk PCD-a (Pined Camrew Own. PM (P%. d i.d.M wOid k;t) PM -1 ob-Od Diisa Dian() PDD- 21PU—W OM —DiWtrj PRD- 11Pi..ed ile=6e.lW Dht•Ft) PAD- 21PI —Od aiv k ) PRD.t 1P*-Md ecidwdial DkUkj) P!!pd ina.,.d IlddeA:d oiu.ict) PRD-31Rs.ned Xm dwKW Dklaim) PSR-4 (PU—ad Sariar OW id) 11- 118kno. Dxiine U-41 a•2iLsub4Orwllba U. PAID MOO. MOAW L Parcels 2002 Asrial Photo Air Quality Better air quality means better individual health and community -wide physical activity. JMS Custom Homes founded the Health House concept in concert with the American Lung Association in 1994. Air quality will be improved by both (a) promoting the use of thoughtful building materials and (b) providing tree lined pedestrian sidewalks. The plan at Bishops Walk includes shade trees adjacent to sidewalks thoughtful density and rational "affordability ". Trees and construction methods play a key role in air quality; shade trees along the streetscape will provide relief from the sun and help improve area air quality. Water Quality Bishops Walk will access clean drinking water provided by the City of Edina. Additionally, all the residents will have the ability to enjoy' the areas pedestrian amenities for convenient access to 50th and France. Bishops Walks design is sensitive to managing water quality. In support of this goal the "green" roofed parking concept was incorporated. Bishops Walk had made significant design efforts to manage water quality at the site development and planning level. Bishops Walks discipline reducing runoff volume by using less hard surfaces in construction (virtually no driveways and an actual green design). Page 7 of 8 41-7 Physical Safety and Mobility Recognizing the role of the automobile is shaping the design of current development, the emphasis of the Bishops Walk site layout is to completely separate pedestrians for the greatest safety. In order to promote moving around (exercise) on foot or by bike, basic safety standards are exceeded. The design intentionally deemphasizes the automobile, while creating comfortable, attractive environment for neighbors of all ages. Bishops Walk is pedestrian oriented solar lighting will be installed along the sidewalk to create a. safe environment. Solar switched lighting on all homes facades will add to a thoughtful evening streetscape. Clear site lines are aided by generally level topography; this is an outstanding safety feature in the community. Less commercial traffic, as the HOA will contract with only one garbage hauler. Conclusion Bishops Walk is a good example of creativity. When redeveloping (infill) Edina sites both developers and the municipality's leadership should be applauded for the collaborative ingenuity. A portion of the site was formerly off the tax roll for our community, as it belonged to a church. What's interesting is that the end result at Bishops Walk is a win -win for all stake holders, the City of Edina, the builder JMS Custom Homes and most importantly the community residents. Page 8 of 8 M �tN��f\ o� e 0 Coll RS ,0 REPORPRECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VI. C. From: Scott Neal City Manager ® ❑ ❑ Action Discussion Information Date: June 21, 2011 Subject: Proposed Policy for Commission Meetings Recording and Rebroadcasting City Advisory ACTION REQUESTED: Approve a new policy for recording and rebroadcasting City Board & Commission meetings. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Currently, the City records and rebroadcasts meetings of the City Council, Planning Commission, Park Board and Transportation Commission. In response to a number of requests from boards and commission seeking waivers from the policy to allow their meetings to be unrecorded, I initiated a policy discussion with the Council to consider how, or if, our current policy on the subject should be amended. I asked board & commission liaisons to raise this issue with their board or commission during their regular March 2011 meetings. The consensus of the input and feedback from the boards and commissions was that the recording of their meetings may inhibit their discussions and stifle their abilities to make the best decisions. The Council held a joint meeting with the chairs of the boards and commissions on May 3. One of the agenda items discussed that night was subject of recording and rebroadcasting of the board and commission meetings. The discussion started with a dialog about the staff's recommendation on the subject: All regular meetings of the City Council and Planning Commission will be recorded and rebroadcast. (This is the same as the current policy.) 2. • All other City Boards and Commission meetings will not be recorded and rebroadcast unless: a. The meeting agenda includes a Public Hearing; or, b. The City Council gives a special direction for the meeting to be recorded and rebroadcast. 3. All Board and Commission meetings that are recorded for rebroadcast shall occur in the City Council Chambers. 4. Any Board and Commission meeting that occurs in the City Council Chambers shall be conducted using the standard City Council dais. It is my recollection from the May 3 Work Session that there was not a consensus of support for the staff recommendation. We also discussed variations on the current policy, which included the following options: Option 1: Continue televising monthly Park Board and Transportation Commission meetings. Pros: Provides a form of transparency expected from many residents. Shows the City Council's value of the Park Board and Transportation Commission. Discontinuing monthly tapings might imply to some that the bodies are less important than they were in the past. The majority of 15 metropolitan area cities surveyed videotape and broadcast meetings of a Park Board. Cons: • Current Park Board and Transportation Commission members have requested a less frequent taping schedule. • No other cities of 15 metropolitan area cities surveyed videotape and broadcast meetings of a Transportation Commission. • Current work load of Park Board and Transportation Commission might not warrant monthly meetings. • Online viewership for these bodies is low. Between Jan. 1, 2010 and April 25, 2011, Park Board meetings were viewed an average of 31 times. The Transportation Commission meetings were viewed an average of 32 times. • Communications & Marketing Department budget is over budget with the addition of 12 more Planning Commission meetings per year. Option 2: Hold and videotape quarterly Park Board and Transportation Commission meetings, with the bodies holding work sessions between. No action is to be taken during work sessions. Pros: Cons: Current Park Board and Transportation Commission members have indicated a preference for this approach. Current work load of Park Board and Transportation Commission might not warrant monthly meetings. Communications & Marketing Department budget would benefit by a net of four fewer meetings to staff per year. Provides less transparency of the work of advisory boards and commissions. A reduction in taping might imply to some that the bodies are less important than they were in the past. iT ••S Online viewership for these bodies is low. A less frequent production cycle could result in even less viewership. If during agenda preparation it is determined that action might need to be taken, taping would be warranted. Finding staff to cover a meeting not regularly scheduled could prove difficult. Option 3: Tape only meetings of the Park Board or Transportation Commission when a public hearing is held or when the City Council directs that a meeting be televised because of a specific issue. Pros: • Current Park Board and Transportation Commission members have requested a less frequent taping schedule. • No other cities of 15 metropolitan area cities surveyed videotape and broadcast meetings of a Transportation Commission. • Online viewership for these bodies is low. • Communications & Marketing Department budget would benefit by a net of 12 fewer meetings to staff per year. Cons: • Provides less transparency of work of Park Board and Transportation Commission. • The.majority of 15 metropolitan area cities surveyed videotape and broadcast meetings of a Park Board. • Current Park Board and Transportation Commission members have requested quarterly taped meetings. • A reduction in taping might imply to some that the bodies are less important than they were in the past. • Finding staff to cover a meeting not regularly scheduled could prove difficult. Option 4: Hold and videotape annual meetings of all advisory boards and commissions in which members recap the work of the previous year. Pros: Cons: Provides more visibility to some boards and commissions. If Park Board and Transportation Commission meetings are also televised just once annually, the Communications & Marketing Department budget would benefit by a net of three fewer meetings to staff per year. Online viewership for Park Board and Transportation Commission is low. Staff does not expect these meetings to be viewed more frequently. Most cities in the metropolitan area do not broadcast meetings of all of their advisory boards & commissions. Recording all commission meetings is not "best practice." The City of Roseville is the only city of 15 surveyed that tapes everything except Police Civil Service Commission. If the Park Board and Transportation Commission meetings are televised quarterly and the other seven advisory boards or commissions televised once annually, the Communications & Marketing Department budget would be impacted by a net of three additional meetings to staff per year. Staff liaisons would also have extra work to prepare for these special meetings. Major projects and actions of advisory boards and commissions are already covered on EDINA 16's original programming "Agenda: Edina" and "In Edina." RECOMMENDATION: While I would continue to recommend the staff's original proposal on this subject, it is clear to me that the majority of Council Members and board and commission chairs do not support that proposal. I believe the consensus at the May 3 Work Session supported a proposal that is somewhat as follows: All meetings of the City Council and the Planning Commission will be recorded and broadcasted. 2. Meetings of the Transportation Commission and the Park Board will be recorded and broadcasted once each quarter. Other regular monthly meetings of these two commissions shall be conducted using a Work Session format similar to that used by the City Council. No action shall be conducted at meetings conducted off - camera. 3. All other boards and commissions will record and broadcast an annual meeting that highlights and summarizes their annual work plan and activities. Additionally, I would propose the City Council add the following two provisions to the policy: 4. All Board and Commission meetings that are recorded for rebroadcast shall occur in the City Council Chambers. 5. All Board and Commission meetings in the City Council Chambers shall be conducted using the standard City Council dais. With additional provisions, I recommend this policy for adoption by the City Council. If adopted, I recommend an effective date of August 1, 2011. 0AN;W W /Py) REPORURECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VI. D. From: Scott Neal City Manager ® Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: June 21, 2011 Subject:. Motion Endorsing Report to State of Minnesota Regarding Local Government Performance Measurement Program ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt motion endorsing report to State of Minnesota authorizing the City's participation in the Local Government Performance Measurement Program. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: In 2010, the Legislature created the Council on Local Results and Innovation (CLRI). In February 2011, the Council released a standard set of ten performance measures for counties and ten performance measures for cities that will aid residents, taxpayers, and state and local elected officials in determining the efficacy of counties and cities in providing services, and measure residents' opinions of those services. By February of 2012, the CLRI must create comprehensive performance measurement systems for cities and counties to implement in 2012. Cities and counties that choose to participate in the new standards measure program may be eligible for a reimbursement in LGA, and exemption from levy limits. Participation in the standard measures program by a city or a county is voluntary. Counties and cities that choose to participate in the standard measures program must officially adopt the corresponding 10 performance benchmarks developed by the CLRI, and implement them in 2011. The model performance measures for cities are as follows: 1. Rating of the overall quality of services provided by your city (Citizen Survey: excellent, good, fair, poor) 2. Percent change in the taxable property market value 3. Citizens' rating of the overall appearance of the city (Citizen Survey: excellent, good, fair, poor) 4. Part I and II crime rates (Submit data as reported by the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension. Part I crimes include murder, rape, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny, motor vehicle theft, and arson. Part II crimes include other assaults, forgery/counterfeiting, embezzlement, stolen property, vandalism, weapons, prostitution, other sex offenses, narcotics, gambling, family /children crime, D.U.I., liquor laws, disorderly conduct, and other offenses.) Citizens' rating of safety in their community (Citizen Survey: very safe, somewhat safe, neither safe nor unsafe, somewhat unsafe, very unsafe) 5. Insurance industry rating of fire services (The Insurance Service Office (ISO) issues ratings to Fire Departments throughout the country for the effectiveness of their fire protection services and equipment to protect their community. The ISO rating is a numerical grading system and is one of the primary elements used by the insurance industry to develop premium rates for residential and commercial businesses. ISO analyzes data using a Fire Suppression Rating Schedule (FSRS) and then assigns a Public Protection Classification from 1 to 10. Class 1 generally represents superior property fire protection and Class 10 indicates that the area's fire suppression program does not meet ISO's minimum criteria.) No Citizens' rating of the quality of fire protection services (Citizen Survey: excellent, good, fair, poor) Output Measure: Fire response time (Time it takes from dispatch to apparatus on scene for calls that are dispatched as a possible fire). Emergency Medical Services (EMS) response time (if applicable) (Time it takes from dispatch to arrival of EMS) 6. Average city street pavement condition rating (Provide average rating and the rating system program /type. Example: 70 rating on the Pavement Condition Index (PCI)) OR Citizens' rating of the road condition in their city (Citizen Survey: good condition, mostly good condition, many bad spots) 7. Citizens' rating the quality of snowplowing on city streets (Citizen Survey: excellent, good, fair, poor) 8. Citizens' rating of the dependability and quality of city water supply (centrally - provided system) (Citizen Survey: excellent, good, fair, poor) I 9. Citizens' rating of the dependability and quality of city sanitary sewer service (centrally provided system) (Citizen Surrey: excellent, good, fair, poor) 10. Citizens' rating of the quality of city recreational programs and facilities (parks, trails, park buildings) (Citizen Survey: excellent, good, fair, poor) A county or city that elects to participate in the standard measures program for 2011 is eligible for a reimbursement of $0.14 per capita in local government aid, not to exceed $25,000 and is also exempt from levy limits under sections 275.70 to 275.74 for taxes payable in 2012, if levy limits are in effect. That amount for Edina is a little over $6,000. The flexibility of a levy limit exemption, however, should not be over - looked. In order to receive the per capita reimbursement in 2011, and levy limit exemption for calendar year 2012, counties and cities must file a report with the Office of the State Auditor by July 1, 2011. This report will consist of a declaration approved by the city council or county board stating that the city /county has adopted the corresponding 10 performance measures developed by the Council. Approval of the motion for this item will constitute the Council's adoption of these performance management measures. Annual reporting will be required by the cities and counties that participate in the program. By July 1, 2012, cities and counties will be required to report to the OSA that they have adopted and implemented both the performance benchmarks, and the performance measure system released by the Council in February of 2012. The City's 2011 Quality of Life Survey (QLS) will provide much of the data needed to comply with this program. Acquisition costs of data required to participate in the program that is not included in the 2011 QLS are minimal. WA \CORPOPAT� J8(�8 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. VI.E. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk ® Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: June 21, 2011 Subject: Resolution No. 2011 -68 Accepting Various Donations ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2011 -68 RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -68 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA City of Edirnca WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Art Center: Pinstripes Restaurant, Inc. Food and Room For Public Art Reception Edina Public Works Department: Premier Fleet - $200.00 Aspen Equipment - $150.00 MCQueen $300.00 Gruber's Power Equipment $250.00 Force America Inc. $200.00 Dated: June 21, 2011 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 21, 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 To :._ MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item- Item No '.'VI.F From: Steve A. Kirchman ® Action Chief Building Official Discussion Date: June 21, 2011 Information Subject: Ordinance 2011 -12 Amending Chapter 4 Of Edina City Code Concerning Electrical Regulations ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt proposed Ordinance 2011 -12 and waive second reading. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Electrical permits are currently issued by the Minnesota Department of. Labor and Industry, and inspected by a State contracted electrical inspector. The expected shutdown of the State government will temporarily terminate electrical permit issuance and inspections. Minnesota Statutes permit political subdivisions to issue permits and perform inspection when authorized by ordinance. The proposed ordinance permits issuance and inspections of electrical permits and provides for permit fees. Arrangements will be made with our current contract inspector to continue with City electrical inspections. Permits will be issued and inspection results recorded through our existing PIMS permitting software. Staff intent is to return to use of State issued permits and inspections once the shutdown has been resolved. ORDINANCE NO. 2011-12 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 4 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING ELECTRICAL REGULATIONS THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Chapter 4 of the Edina City Code is amended by adding Section 412 to provide as follows: Section 412 — Electrical Regulations 412.01 Purpose; Application of this Section Subd. 1 The purpose of this Section is to implement the provisions of the Minnesota State Building Code and Minnesota Rules Chapter 1315 which adopts the National Electrical Code. Subd. 2 The provisions of this Section shall apply to all installations of electrical conductors, fittings, devices, fixtures hereinafter referred to as "electrical equipment', within or on public and private buildings and premises, with the following general exceptions. The provisions of this Section do not apply to the installations in mines, ships, railway cars, aircraft, automotive equipment or the installations or equipment employed by a railway, electric or communication utility in the exercise of its functions as a utility, except as otherwise provided in this Section. Subd. 3 As used in this Section, "reasonably safe to persons and property' as applied to electrical installations and electrical equipment means safe to use in the service for which the installation or equipment is intended without unnecessary hazard to life, limb or property. Subd.4 For purposes of interpretation of the provisions of this Section, the most recently published edition of the National Electrical Code shall be prima facie evidence of the definitions and scope of words and terms used in this Section. 412.02 Electrical Inspector, Qualifications and Appointment Subd. 1 Creation; Qualifications: There is hereby created the office of Electrical Inspector. The person chosen to fill the office of Electrical Inspector shall be of good moral character, shall be possessed of such executive ability as is requisite for the performance of his duties and shall have a thorough knowledge of the standard materials and methods used in the installation of electrical equipment; shall be well versed in approved methods of construction for safety to persons and property; the statutes of the State relating to electrical work and any orders, rules and regulations issued by authority thereof; and the National Electrical Code as approved by the American Standards Association; shall have two (2) years' experience as an electrical inspector or five (5) years' experience in the installation of electrical equipment, or a graduate mechanical or electrical engineer with two (2) years of practical electrical experience. A. Licensed Inspector: The electrical inspector shall be a licensed master or journeymen electrician as defined under Minnesota Statutes. B. Duties of the Electrical Inspector: It shall be the duty of the Inspector to enforce the provisions of this Section. The Inspector shall, upon application, grant permits for the installation or alteration of electrical equipment, and shall make inspections of electrical installations, all as provided in this Section. The Inspector shall keep complete records of all permits issued, inspections and reinsertions made and other official work performed in accordance with the provisions of this Section. C. No Financial Interest: It shall be unlawful for the Inspector to engage in the sale, installation or maintenance of electrical equipment, directly or indirectly, and the Inspector shall have no financial interest in any concern engaged in any such business. D. Authority of Electrical Inspector: The Inspector shall have the right during reasonable hours to enter any building or premises in the discharge of his official duties, or for the purpose of making any inspection, reinsertion or test of electrical equipment contained therein or its installation. When any electrical equipment is found by the Inspector to be dangerous to persons or property because it is defective or defectively installed, the person responsible for the electrical equipment shall be notified in writing and shall make any changes or repairs required in the judgment of the Inspector to place such equipment in safe condition. If such work is not completed within fifteen (15) days or any longer period that may be specified by the Inspector in said notice, the Inspector shall have the authority to disconnect or order discontinuance of electrical service to said electrical equipment. In cases of emergency where necessary for safety to persons and property, or where electrical equipment may interfere with the work of the Fire Department, the Inspector shall have the authority to disconnect or cause disconnection immediately of any electrical equipment. 412.03 Standards for Electrical Equipment Installation Subd. 1 All installations of electrical equipment shall be reasonably safe to persons and property and in conformity with the provisions of this Section and the applicable statutes of the State and all orders, rules and regulations_ issued by the authority thereof. All electrical equipment shall be listed and labeled by a testing agency. Subd.2 Conformity of I installations:of electrical equipment with applicable regulations set forth in the current National Electrical Code as adopted by the Minnesota Rules shall be prima facie evidence that such installations are, reasonably safe. to persons and property. Noncompliance with the provisions of this.Section or the National Electrical Code. as adopted by the Minnesota Rules shall be prima facie evidence that the installation is not reasonably safe to persons and property. Subd. 3 The Electrical Inspector -may, with approval oft he. Building. Official, authorize installations, of special wiring methods other than Herein provided for. Subd.4 Buildings. or structures moved from without to within and within the limits of the City shall conform to all. of the requirements of this Code.for new buildings or structures. Subd. 5 Existing buildings or structures hereafter changed in use shall conform in all respects to the requirements of this Code for the new use. 412.04 Connections to Installations Subd.1 It shall be unlawful for any person to make connections from a supply of electricity to any electrical equipment for the installation of which a permit is required or which has been disconnected or.ordered to be disconnecte& by the Electrical Inspector. Subd..2 The public or private utility providing services shall disconnect the same upon a written order from the Electrical Inspector, if the Inspector considers any electrical. installation unsafe to. life and property or installed contrary to this Code. �J 412.05 Permits and Inspectors Subd. 1 Permit Required: An electrical permit is required for each installation, alteration, addition or repair of electrical work for light, heat and power within the limits of the City. Permits for the installation of electrical work in new structures shall only be issued to electrical contractors duly licensed by the State. Permits for the installation, alteration, addition or repair of electrical work in existing structures shall only be issued to electrical contractors duly licensed by the State or to resident owners of property where the work is to be done. Subd. 2 Public Service Corporation Exception: No permit shall be required for electrical installations of equipment owned, leased, operated or maintained by a public service corporation which is used by said corporation in the performance of its function as a utility, except that such electrical installation shall conform to the minimum standards of the National Electrical Safety Code. Subd.3 Ownership: Ownership of any transmission or distribution lines or appurtenances thereto, including, but not limited to, transformers, shall not be transferred by a public service corporation to any person, except another franchised public service corporation dealing in electric energy for distribution and sale, without a permit first having been issued therefore by the City. Such permit shall be issued only after the facilities to be transferred have been inspected and approved as provided in this Section and upon payment of an inspection fee as set forth in this Section of the Section. Subd. 4 Application and Plans: Application for such permit, describing the electrical work to be done, shall be made in writing, to the City by the person so registered to do such work. The application shall be accompanied by such plans, specifications and schedules as may be necessary to determine whether the electrical installation as described will be in conformity with all the legal requirements. The fees for electrical inspection as set forth in this Section shall accompany such application. If applicant has complied with all of the provisions of this Section, a permit for such electrical installation shall be issued. Subd. 5 Concealment: All electrical installations which involve the concealment of wiring or equipment shall have a "rough -in" inspection prior to concealment, wherein the Inspector shall be duly notified in advance, excluding Saturday, Sunday and holidays. Subd. 6 Inspection Fees: A. Permits Required: Before commencing any installation of any work regulated by this Section, a permit therefore shall be secured from the Building Department and the fee for such permit paid. The fess schedule set forth in Minnesota Statutes § 32613.37 is adopted by reference and incorporated herein. No such permit shall be issued to do any of the work or make any installation regulated by this Section except to persons licensed to do such work under the terms of this Section. Holders of a contractor's license shall not obtain permits for electrical work unless the work is supervised by them and is performed by workers employed by them or their firm. B. Fees Double, When: Should any person begin work of any kind, such as set forth in this Section, or for which a permit from the Electrical Inspector is required by ordinance, without having. secured the necessary permit therefore from the Inspector of Buildings either previous to or during the day of the commencement of any such work, or on the next succeeding day where such work -is commenced on-6. Saturday-or on -a- Sunday -or a- holiday, he- shall,, when subsequently securing such permit, be required to pay double the fees provided for such permit. C. Additional Fees and /or Shortages: Additional fees and /or fee shortages must be received by the City withinfourteen (14) days of.written notice. If additional fees and /or fee shortages are not received within',-fourteen (14) days of notice, permits,for electrical installations will not be accepted by the City until such time as the additional fees and/or fee short ages are received. Subd.8 Electrical Inspections: A. At regular intervals, the Electrical Inspector shall visit all premises where work may be done under annual permits and shall inspect all electrical equipment installed under such a permit since the day of his last previous inspection, and shall issue a certificate of approval for such work as is found to be in conformity with the provisions of this Section, after the fee required has been paid. B. When any electrical equipment is to be hidden from view by the permanent placement of parts of the building, the person installing the equipment shall notify the Electrical Inspector and such equipment shall not be concealed until it has been inspected and approved by the Electrical Inspector or until twenty four (24) hours, exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays and holidays, shall have elapsed from the time,of such scheduled inspection; provided, that on large installations where. the concealment of equipment proceeds .continuously, the person installing the electrical equipment shall give the Electrical Inspector due notice and inspections -shall be made periodically during the progress of the work. C. If.upon inspection, the installation is not found to, be fully in conformity with the provisions of this Section, the Electrical Inspector shall at once forward, to the person making the installation a written notice stating the defects which have been found to exist. Section 2. This ordinance is effective on July 1, 2011. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publish in the Edina Sun Current on: Send two affidavits of publication. Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly,adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2011. City Clerk ATTACHMENTS: Proposed Ordinance No. 2011 -12 i I REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VII. DEBRA MANGEN Action From: CITY CLERK Discussion Information Date: JUNE 21, 2011 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received since the last Council meeting. f F CMM ._ JUN 16 5-13-11 x{350 iar — sCoii' rrcaO� rl tt4'v.,►�L-P�, ,V RECENED JUN 16 2011 Chief Scheerer, I was fortunate to use the services of our paramedic service on Nay i5. I say fortunate because there is no place I would rather be when in need of emergency medicaCservices. FortunateCy nothing life threatening was found at this time. I'm stiff being electronically monitored .Although I found the shrimp and martinis during my transport above and beyond; they were enjoyed JWy deepest thanks to -Nally Fasulo andNike Gorshe for their professionalism and dedication. Thanks, '1Vik xonters . 1 � ( 1 Susan Howl To: City Council Members Subject: FW: Edina Resident's Memorandum Opposing Proposed Zoning Change Attachments: Memorandum Regarding Proposed Zoning Change_06- 17- 1 1_FINAL.pdf From: Clifford S. Anderson [ mailto :csanderson @hjlawfirm.com] Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 12:18 PM To: Susan Howl; Cary Teague Cc: ' Ginny Anderson' Subject: Edina Resident's Memorandum Opposing Proposed Zoning Change Dear Ms. Howl and Mr. Teague: F R n In 7EC N 17 1011 --------------- Per my wife Ginny Anderson's discussions and /or voice mails to each of you today, enclosed is a self - explanatory memorandum that a number of homeowners and other interested parties request that you provide to the Mayor, Members of the Edina City Council, and Members of the Edina Planning Commission concerning the recent project proposed by JMS Custom Homes for our neighborhood near 501h & France. Please note that this email with the enclosed Memorandum is being sent from my work email because, unfortunately, our home computer was damaged last evening due to a power outage so my wife is unable to send it from her work email address that originates from our home computer. I state that fact only to make clear that my Edina law firm, Hellmuth & Johnson, is not involved in this matter nor have I nor any of my colleagues been retained in any respect to represent anybody involved in this matter. I do, personally, join in the efforts of those supporting the content of the enclosed Memorandum as I and my wife are affected residents in this matter in that we reside at 5029 Indianola Avenue, Edina, Minnesota 55424. We would greatly appreciate it if one or both of you would ensure that the Mayor, all Members of the Edina City Council, and all Members of the Edina Planning Commission receive a copy of this Memorandum as soon as possible, and preferably through email circulation yet today, before the close of business. Please do not hesitate to contact me at my work or cell phone number below should you have any questions. Thank you for your assistance and consideration. Very truly yours, Clifford S. Anderson Attorney at Law Direct dial: (952) 746 -2190 Cell Phone: (952) 201 -3722 csanderson(cD_hllawfirm. com MEMORANDUM TO: The Honorable James Hovland, Mayor of Edina, Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague and Ann Swenson, Edina City Council Members, Stephen Brown, Jeff Carpenter, Michael Fischer, Arlene Forrest, Floyd Grabiel Julie Risser, Nancy Scherer, Michael Schroeder, Kevin Staunton, and Patrick Schnettler, Edina City Planning Commissioners, and Cary Teague, City of Edina Planning Director FROM: Opposition Single Family Homeowners residing on properties located on Indianola, Juanita, and Arden Avenues in Edina, Minnesota and Other Interested Parties DATE: June 17, 2011 RE: Objection of Edina residents to zoning change from RI to PSR -3 /PRD -3 as proposed by JMS Custom Homes for R1 zoned neighborhood INTRODUCTION On Saturday, June 4, several property owners (the "Opposition Single Family Homeowners ") who reside in single family homes in the neighborhood encompassing Indianola, Juanita and Arden Avenues (i.e., the "Subject Neighborhood "), and certain other interested parties (the "Other Interested Parties "), collectively, unless otherwise noted, referred to simply as the Opposition Single Family Homeowners for ease of reference, learned that on June 1, JMS Custom Homes ( "JMS ") presented a "Sketch Plan Review" to the Edina Planning Commission. The proposal of JMS was for the development of a substantial multi- family housing project (the "Proposed Project ") in the Subject Neighborhood. The Proposed Project is contemplated for the land in the Subject Neighborhood currently occupied by two single family homes located at 5020 and 5024 Indianola Avenue, Edina, Minnesota and a portion of the southern -most section of the Edina Covenant Church parking lot located at 4201 West 501h Street, Edina, Minnesota. The latter tract of land is adjacent to the northern -most boundary of the Subject Neighborhood. Of significant concern to the Opposition Single Family Homeowners is the fact that the Proposed Project, as contemplated, would require a significant and unacceptable change to Edina's Comprehensive Plan for the Subject Neighborhood. Specifically, to enable the Proposed Project to be constructed as designed, a prerequisite would be a change in the zoning for the pertinent land at issue from R1 status to PSR -3 or PRD -3 1 status. Such a change in zoning would be wholly inconsistent with the character of the Subject Neighborhood that has been zoned for single family residential use for more than 70 years. For example, if Edina were to approve such a zoning change, the modification would dramatically alter a solidly single .fami.ly residential neighborhood from low density single family zoning to medium density multi -unit residential zoning, that theoretically could allow for a building potentially as high as four stories that would be adjacent to several single family homes. For the above principal reason, the Opposition Single Family Homeowners respectfully request that the Edina City Council and the Edina Planning Commission, as applicable, reject such a change in zoning for the land contemplated to be purchased and used by JMS for the Proposed Project. Additionally, the Opposition Single Family Homeowners request that such a change be defeated for any other future proposed multi- family housing project for the site in question that might be proposed by JMS or by any other developer interested in purchasing and re- developing the land at issue. BACKGROUND' According to JMS's proposal, and pending the Comprehensive Plan change requested by JMS, JMS intends to purchase the two homes at 5020 and 5024 Indianola Avenue for demolition purposes. JMS would also purchase a sizable portion (approximately 50 %) of the southern-most part of the Edina Covenant Church parking lot. Such land would then be combined with the two Indianola lots to form a single parcel. JMS proposes to build seven "moderately" sized /priced homes on this combined parcel targeted toward seniors as an alternative pedestrian enclave near the 50`' and France commercial district. City approval would require not only re- zoning but multiple variances. The Proposed Project land is bordered on three sides by single family homes well within the Subject Neighborhood and a duplex on the north side as part of the Edina Covenant Church complex. Proposed access to the site is located 250 feet south of 501h Street on Indianola Avenue. Consequently, in its present configuration, the tract of land at issue is not utilized as transitional property since it is surrounded on four sides by residential properties. By contrast, and a useful comparison, the multi -unit condominium building at 501h and Halifax that borders the 501h and France shopping district is best We are writing this Memorandum based upon the best information available to us at this time. JMS has not provided us with any information and only recently sent a letter to certain neighbors in the Subject Neighborhood. In it, JMS offered to present its plan to the neighborhood on June 20'h, just 24 hours before the next City Council meeting at which JMS intends to present their Sketch Pan Review to the City Council. Thus, as of this writing, only two sources of information have been easily available to us. One piece of information is a marketing brochure prepared by JMS. It has almost no substantive information. A second source of information is the Planning Commission's You Tube video. Neither the brochure nor the video fully addresses the troubling substantive problems that would be caused by the Proposed Project because of the limited information provided by JMS at this early phase of the process. 2 characterized as transitional property from a zoning and planning perspective given that it is not surrounded by residential single family homes which is the case for the Proposed Project site. On Sunday night, June 5, a large majority of the Opposition Single Family Homeowners, who either own properties that border the Proposed Project or are across from it, as well as Other Interested Parties, met to discuss the Proposed Project put forth by JMS. At that time, to our knowledge, no representative from JMS had made contact with any of the Opposition Single Family Homeowners. Following discussion, there was unanimity in. opposition to the Proposed Project. The Opposition Single Family Homeowners all. believe very strongly that a change in the Comprehensive Plan zoning from RI to PSR -3 or PRD -3 would adversely impact individual properties and that such a change is not in the best interests of Edina and its residents. If Edina City Council grants a change in the Edina Comprehensive Plan so as to allow the Proposed Project to move forward, such a zoning change would irrevocably and materially alter the unique bidianola/Juanita/Arden single - family neighborhood and open the door for future medium density housing within a firmly established low density neighborhood. Even if the City does not ultimately support the Proposed Project as currently contemplated by JMS, any significant change to the area's zoning, as requested at this time, would allow unknown future development and could potentially destabilize current home values in the neighborhood. It is important to understand that the Opposition Single Family Homeowners purchased or constructed their homes in the Subject Neighborhood with the belief that our unique neighborhood nestled near, yet insulated from, the bustling 501h & France commercial district would remain just what it is; a single family residential neighborhood within five minutes walk to 501h and France. We believe that a full exploration of the Proposed Project will demonstrate that the proposal to re- zone this R1 District to a PRD -3 or PSR -3 District violates Edina's Comprehensive Plan, encroaches into our RI-zoned neighborhood, and is ill advised. DISCUSSION Subdivision 4 of City Code 850.04 is intended to guide the Commission and Council. when they are considering applications and petitions for deviations from the City's Comprehensive Plan. Rezoning any portion of a neighborhood from RI status to PRD -3 or PSR -3 status is a drastic step. The careful application of the factors listed in Subd. 4(c)(5) (a -g) of the Code is crucial. For the following reasons, each factor dictates against a zoning change. 1. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. The Proposed Project is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. As noted above, the Proposed Project would require numerous variances, as well. as the re- zoning of two properties from R1 to PD3. The City should only approve changes to the Comprehensive Plan from R 1 status in exceptional circumstances. The Proposed Project does not 3 involve property located at the outer -most edge of an R1 zone on a major thoroughfare such as 50`h Street. Rather, the Proposed Project encroaches into the R1 zoning of the Subject Neighborhood. If. the City were to allow this initial encroachment, it could necessarily invite and pave the way for other future encroachments. For example, with such a change, it becomes that much more likely that JMS, or another developer, could then purchase the entire church property and petition the city to build, for example, a medium density, multi -story apartment or condominium complex at that location. A developer could justify this land use change on the basis that. its new proposed use was consistent with the Proposed Project if that project were approved. Such a developer could then promote it just as JMS is promoting its proposal: come live just a short walk from 50`h and France. This is not a sequence of events that residents of the Subject Neighborhood are willing to allow without forceful opposition. Each of us purchased our homes reasonably assuming that the Subject Neighborhood would remain zoned in accordance with Edina's Comprehensive Plan. We all know that changes are inevitable. However, Edina should not change its Comprehensive Plan when doing so would wreak havoc on a 70 plus year established and defined neighborhood. 2. Is the Proposed Project consistent with the preliminary site plait? Only a Sketch Plan has been prepared by JMS to date. Because the Sketch Plan Review process allows a developer to propose ideas to the City without extensive upfront costs and limited public scrutiny, the Proposed Project offers inadequate understanding of existing conditions or explanation of any adverse impact this contemplated development may present in light of the current conditions at the site. 3. The proposal must not be detrimental to surrounding properties. The Proposed Project likely would be very detrimental to property values of the Opposition Single Family Homeowners. Within the last five years, the City granted building permits for the construction of three brand new single family homes at 5021 Indianola, 5025 Indianola and 5028 Juanita. Two are directly across the street from the Proposed Project and the third abuts the south side of the Proposed Project. Each has a tax assessed value over $1,100,000. Each house was built after an owner or builder bought the existing smaller house, obtained a City building permit, and demolished the existing obsolete house. The homeowner then built a much larger, more expensive home, thereby significantly increasing the City's tax rolls. Without the R1 zoning intact, it is unlikely a homeowner or builder would ever have taken the risk of building an expensive single family home abutting a medium density zone as proposed in JMS' request for a zoning change. The builders and homeowners relied on the fact that all areas near to them were, and would remain for the indefinite future, zoned as R1 status. These homeowners had every right to expect that the City would not, within a very short time of their purchase, approve a dramatic and out -of- character change in zoning that would allow for the construction of seven houses behind existing single F family homes. Rather than what is being contemplated in the Proposed Project, the referenced homeowners had every reason to believe that at some point in the future a developer would purchase the two houses targeted for tear down according to the Proposed Project and build either one or two homes comparable to the adjacent new homes. In the unanimous view of the neighborhood, it would be unwise and improper for the City to approve a redistricting of the Comprehensive Plan to enable the Proposed Project to proceed such a short time after these homeowners built, in reliance on the current and longstanding residential zoning of the Subject Neighborhood, their large, beautiful homes. In addition, the seven homes encompassing the Proposed Project would be inconsistent with all of the surrounding single family homes both in character and in yard setback requirements, street access, street frontage, etc. 4. Would the proposal result in overly intensive land use? The answer to this question is plainly "yes." The level of use would definitely exceed that intended under. the Comprehensive Plan for the Subject Neighborhood as currently zoned. Moreover, if the City allows the zoning district change to PSR -3 or PRD -3, and the seven proposed homes, or some variation of them, are built but do not sell — a real. possibility in the current real estate environment — the new development could easily further depress already depressed home values caused by the recent recession thus further diminishing the ability to re -sell existing homes in the Subject Neighborhood. 5. Would the plan cause utzdue traffic congestion or hazards? Unlike other medium density projects that have been approved by the City, the Proposed Project has no access to a major street or thoroughfare. This factor severely compromises the viability of this project. The possibilities for entrance and egress are extremely limited. The first is.Jay Place, officially an Edina street but currently used as a one lane alley paralleling Arden Ave. The second choice is the narrow alley abutting the south side entrance to the First Covenant Church. A thud option is a proposed new entrance /exit from Indianola Avenue to the proposed below grade parking structure for the new units. Indianola is a narrow, short street designed and maintained to service the homeowners who reside on it or a short distance from it. It is not wide enough to allow parking on both sides of the street nor does it have any sidewalks. Church attendance often fills the existing parking lot, both for regular Sunday services as well as on Wednesday nights. The church also frequently hosts special events such as weddings resulting in a full parking lot and overflow parking. On Election Day, the parking lot is often completely full and the overflow spills onto Indianola and beyond. Similarly, although only occurring once a year, during the Edina All Fair, the church parking lot is filled with vehicles from exhibitors who park in the lot. By reducing the parking lot by approximately half, vehicles normally able to park in the lot for these occasions could be pushed into very limited parking in the 5 Subject Neighborhood. There is no available parking on 501h Street. As those in the Subject Neighborhood and many Edina residents know, there are frequently two lanes of traffic in each direction at the 50`h and Indianola intersection during morning and afternoon rush hours. Thus, it is extremely difficult to make a left hand turn onto 501h from any street in the Subject Neighborhood, including Indianola, during such high traffic times. Adding yet more traffic from this development to an already existing heavy traffic area is adding fuel to the fire of an already problematic traffic situation in this area. 6. Does the proposal conform to the Code? A zoning district change to the Comprehensive Plan would not be sufficient to allow construction for the Proposed Project. A minimum of five zoning variances would also be required to allow the type of development contemplated by the Proposed Project. For .example, the proposed single family homes within the Proposed Project would have none of the setback allowances currently permitted by the Edina Zoning Ordinance. 7. Does the proposed structure provide proper relationships between itself and existing structures? The proposed structure does not provide a proper relationship with existing structures, open space issues and the natural features of the area. The proposed structure grossly deviates from the existing R1 homes. The footprint of each of the seven new homes is quite small compared to the footprints of any of the houses next to and near them. They would be grossly out of character. The front of the new homes would face, not a street, but the backyards of the existing homes along Indianola, Juanita and Arden Avenues. The backside of the new homes would face a church parking lot. The density of the Proposed Project strongly suggests a mere few feet between dwellings, though JMS' designer has stated that the primary windows for the units would be in the sides of the houses. Would new homeowners experience any natural daylight into the units or would the blinds be permanently closed for privacy? While the limited available information at this time provided by JMS is a hindrance to any attempt to assess meaningfully and fully the impact or viability of the Proposed Project, there are a number of specific issues that are great cause for concern should the City grant a Comprehensive Plan redistricting change and thereby effectively endorse continued momentum forward for the Proposed Project. A. Water drainage. The Proposed Project raises a number of engineering concerns. There is a significant issue of runoff from rain and snow melt associated with the land at issue. According to JMS' plan, these buildings will stand on a solid, flat concrete surface covered with a minimal amount of dirt and grass. The concrete cap will serve as the roof of the parking garage below the homes. This cap will likely rapidly shed water faster and decrease the amount of water naturally absorbed into the ground. There is already a significant existing water drainage issue for several of the homes me directly to the south of the Proposed Project. These homes are several inches lower than the Proposed Project. Several times a year, these properties have as much as two inches of standing water in their respective backyards. This at least partially results from several houses that front Arden Avenue and back up to the west side of the church parking lot. Jay Place also contributes significantly to this water runoff problem. It is highly likely that the creation of this large, non- absorbent cement "pad" would exacerbate this existing problem. Even in light snow years, a significant portion of the church parking lot is covered for much of the winter with plowed snow. This proposal would, due to the huge potential for flooding, necessitate hauling all snow from the remaining parking lot and the proposed site. It would also require the City to haul all snow out of the Jay Place alley. Drainage issues would also affect Indianola, since water from the Proposed Project would undoubtedly be shed onto Indianola. The front of the Proposed Project is just to the south of the lowest point of Indianola. Runoff water from all four directions converges at the bottom of the grade on Indianola. This raises obvious issues of storm sewer capacity. B. Grade issues. There is a significant change of grade on this property from the west end to the east end. The drawings contained in the marketing literature assembled seem to indicate that the seven houses would be built at the same level. Given the grade change of several feet, it would appear to be difficult to build all. seven houses at one level. To achieve the same grade from west to east, it appears that either the west end would need to be lowered or the east end would need to be raised, or a combination of both. This would seemingly considerably compromise the attempt by JMS to market these as easily accessible ground level homes for seniors and again cause potential ground water issues. C. Other issues. The proposed name for the project is "Bishops Walk." The marketing brochure by JMS repeatedly touts the "pedestrian life style" the owners will enjoy. However, the physical features of this property actually may limit the ability of a resident to use the Proposed Project in a pedestrian friendly manner. If the Proposed Project were to be built, there would be two possible areas for pedestrian walkways to and from it. The first would be for residents to walk west through the church parking lot to Jay Place, then north to 501h Street and east toward 50`h and France. Again, Jay Place is currently nothing more than an alley with a street sign on it. It is single car width, and there is no room whatsoever for the construction of any type of walkway or sidewalk alongside Jay Place to 50`h street. Thus, anyone walking west from the proposed project would be forced to travel in an alley with car traffic. The only other logical walkway would be to walk from the east end of the property to Indianola, turn north up Indianola, and walk to 50`' Street. However, there are no sidewalks on Indianola, so any walking would be in the street itself. A 7 person walking north on Indianola encounters a significant grade /rise as he or she approaches 50`h Street. Thus, making the* Proposed Project a pedestrian friendly complex appears to be more challenging than has been considered at this time by JMS. Limited convenient or pedestrian friendly access by the new residents would likely result in more, not less, automobile use by residents, causing further congestion. CONCLUSION Most of the residents who are affected by the proposed zoning changes and contemplated new development have lived in Edina for a number of years. Together we have tried to ascertain whether the City has ever granted a zoning change that would permit a group of medium density homes to encroach dramatically into a single family, mature neighborhood, thereby drastically altering the historical character of the neighborhood. It does not appear that there is any precedent for this type of zoning change. One of the basic tenets of good governance is that those who are similarly situated should be treated the same. The fact that the City approved the Noonan Project at 52nd and France should not be a precedent for the Proposed Project. That development is easily distinguishable. The Noonan Project is on the busy thoroughfare of France Avenue. Thus, no congestion or traffic hazard was created. The Noonan Project produced units valued at well over one million dollars. Consequently, such facts defeat any suggestion that those homes decrease the value of the adjacent properties. It is our understanding that this matter will be discussed at the next City Council meeting on June 21, 201. 1. As many of us as possible will attend the meeting to convey our opposition to the proposed zoning change to Edina's Comprehensive Plan from District R1 to District PRD -3 or PSR -3. Stated succinctly, we strongly oppose the change to portions of our neighborhood to a medium density zoned district because such a change would allow the Proposed Project, or some other even more dense future development, to go forward contrary to the unique character of our neighborhood. We purchased homes in our neighborhood precisely for what it offers: a single family neighborhood like all the surrounding neighborhoods such as Country Club but with the special feature of being within walking distance of 50`h and France. There already exist plenty of medium density housing options in the vicinity of 501h and France that are not embedded within a solidly single family neighborhood. The views represented in this memorandum constitute 100% of all property owners whose property directly abuts the Proposed Project who have been able to participate in our discussions to date. In addition, all other property owners whose property borders on or is separated by any street that is accessed by these property owners oppose this re- zoning. We look forward to attending the City Council meeting on June 21 as part of the process to address the issues raised by the Proposed Project. We hope the City Council N. ultimately decides to deny any formal request for rezoning portions of our neighborhood from R -1 to a higher density classification whether now or in the future. To that end, we anticipate being able to provide to you at the June 21 City Council meeting a Petition identifying the specific Opposition Single Family Homeowners and Other Interested Parties who are in agreement with the content of this Memorandum. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Opposition Single Family Homeowners and Other Interested Parties 0 W Susan Howl From: Linda Roberts <lindatroberts @gmail.com >4 7�rr- r �\4� j Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 11:48 AMt To: Susan Howl Cc: joshs @cbburnet.com JUN 1 as t Subject: York Garden Information ' Attachments: A -C survey summary.doc TO: Mayor James Hovland and the City Council Please see the attached survey that was conducted among residents of the Village Homes at Centennial Lakes re: the impact of the York Gardens air conditioning unit. We hope you will find it helpful and enlightening in finding a speedy solution to this problem. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Linda & William Roberts 7420 Edinborough Way #6306 Edina, MN 55435 Village Homes at Centennial Lakes Quality of Life Survey: York Gardens' Air Conditioning Unit This survey was fielded on Wednesday, June 8, 2011 to homeowners in the Village Homes at Centennial Lakes community, which has 250 condominiums. Those polled live in units that face Edinborough Way, across the street from the York Gardens air conditioning structure, or units that are on the NE or SE corners of the Village Homes development. Residents represent a variety of ages and genders, and a mix of both working people and retirees. All returned surveys were signed, with the unit number also indicated. As of June 15, completed surveys reflect a 90% response rate. The results are as follows: • The vast majority of respondents said "Yes" — they are disturbed by the sound of the unit (83 %). Note: If respondent checked "No" they did not complete the rest of the survey. • . Nearly all of those disturbed by the sound are Extremely + +, Extremely or Very disturbed (93 %). When asked how they are disturbed, 93% indicated the A/C unit inhibits use of their patio; 87% said the unit prevents the opening of windows & patio doors; and 80% noted that the unit was disruptive to their sleep. Other concerns included: the unit could devalue property for resale; the noise causes stress & anxiety; and the A/C is ugly & unsightly Comments made by respondents: • This machine needs to go • Our bedroom window is on the first floor, directly across the street from the chiller and transformer. This equipment has to be moved, or turned OFF completely at night. • This is an ugly piece of equipment, extremely inappropriate for the avenue, and is VERY loud. • The neighborhood and neighbors were not taken into consideration AT ALL. The unit should have been placed on the east side of the building; it should be moved to that side NOW. Actually; York Gardens residents should want it moved away from their patio /deck. I trusted that 7500 York & Ebenezer planners /architects would take into consideration the impact this structure would have on its immediate neighbors at Centennial Lakes Village Homes. This, unfortunately, was not the case. I, along with my neighbors who face Edinborough Way, have endured the noise of York Gardens' construction for 14 months from 7am -4pm Monday- Friday, and the dirt/dust issue this has raised. Also, accessing Edinborough Way with my car to go in & out of our driveway dodging bobcats, etc.; constant mechanical noises; and not being able to use my patios or open my doors for fresh air. When the chiller was first fired up on May 7th it sounded like a 747 jet taking off. I still cannot enjoy my patios or fresh air due to the noise. Its location between two 3 -4 story buildings seems to amplify the noise. I've had to take medication just to get what little sleep I can. This noise pollution issue of York Gardens' new air conditioning unit has greatly affected my quality of life and I would appreciate an expedited solution with the onset of warm, summer weather. The new unit appears to be something that should be on top of a commercial building, not located at ground level, especially due to the noise level. That way the noise would have some place to go with the least amount of disruption. • The air conditioner is unsightly and the noise will devalue our homes. • 1 keep my drapes closed to keep down the noise, so I feel like a hermit. Sitting on my patio or using my patio is out. I haven't planted flowers in my window boxes as I don't go out on my patio. • There are many health - related issues associated with lack of sleep. I'm sure I'm not the only one who has trouble sleeping, even when the windows are closed. • My bedroom faces the courtyard, so my sleep is not disrupted. • In some aspects the quality of life at Centennial Lakes has changed somewhat. It's less peaceful. I would like to be compensated by paying lower taxes. We should all demand that, at the least (lower taxes), for compensation. After all, what can we do: to change what has already been built? The A/C unit is directly outside my windows /slider door. It inhibits use of the windows when it's running. You can't even carry on a normal conversation when it's running. In addition to the noise, it's extremely ugly. Had it been there when I was buying this unit, I would not have purchased this unit ! -2- With windows closed, my A/C on & my TV on, I can still hear that noise. I am essentially directly opposite the chiller. I hear that thing during the night. The chiller should be moved to the east side of their building. It is possible that a fence could make the noise worse (same noise in a smaller space). How could you sell your unit with that noise? • I'm in a corner and face the south side, but on the deck it sounds like traffic — not peaceful ! The chiller needs to be contained ASAP ! • The noise does not bother me but I do think it is an eyesore. Linda Roberts 6/16/11 -3- June 13, 2011 Mayor James Hovland Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 West 50'' Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland and Council Members: 7 JUN 17 2011 We're 12 -year residents of the Village Homes at Centennial Lakes. With the recent developments across Edinborough Way at York Gardens, several residents have met informally, and have contacted our Village Homes Board of Directors, York Gardens, and various City of Edina officials. Attached is a copy of a letter we received today from one of our older homeowners regarding quality of life issues involving York Gardens and the illegal air conditioning unit. We hope this letter sheds some light on our collective problem and how this installation has affected our community. We would appreciate a prompt resolution to this issue. Thank you very much. Sincerely, Linda & William Roberts 7420 Edinborough Way #6306 Edina, MN 55435 Genevieve A. Behmen 7420 Edinborough Way # 6110 Edina, MN 55435 952.835.2225 gene7208@ayahoo.com Linda Roberts 7420 Edinborough Way # 6306 Edina, MN 55435 RE: York Garden's Air Conditioning Unit - Quality of Life Survey Dear Linda — Thank you for your survey addressing the issue of the air conditioning unit that was installed along the backside of the new construction of York Gardens. This unit sits on the Edinborough Way side of York Gardens, which is almost directly across from my condo unit on ground level. I am 88 years old and I have owned my unit since July of 2005. I purchased this unit for many reasons, mainly due to the quality of life that this area of Edina has offered its residents with the park -like setting of Centennial Lakes and the expanse of green space of 7500 York. I was hoping to spend the remainder of my life enjoying these amenities. You can imagine my disappointment when York Gardens was proposed. I realize the need for this facility and I trusted that 7500 York and Ebenezer planners /architects would take into consideration the impact this structure would have on its immediate neighbors at Centennial Lakes Village Homes. This, unfortunately, was not the case. I, along with my neighbors who face Edinborough Way, have endured the noise of construction for fourteen months from 7 am. — 4 p.m. Monday through Friday and the dirt/dust issue this has raised. I also found it difficult accessing Edinborough Way with my car to go in and out of our driveway dodging bobcats, heavy equipment and eighteen -wheel semis delivering materials, let alone the "beep- beep - beep" and mechanical noise of this equipment. During this time I have not been able to enjoy sitting on my patios, nor open my patio doors for fresh air since I don't have any other windows on that side. I have yet to find out the toll this has taken on my aging central air conditioning unit that sits on one of my patios. Enough history; let me address the issue of the commercial air conditioning unit that sits across the street from my unit. When it was first fired up on May 7, 2011, it sounded like a 747 jet plane taking off. I still cannot enjoy my patios nor fresh air due to the noise of this unit. Its location between two 3 to 4 -story buildings seems to amplify the noise. This noise not only prohibits my use of my patios (for enjoyment, entertaining, or reading), but I don't open my patios doors for the fresh air because the noise level is that loud. I have enjoyed sleeping with my patio door ajar (with lock engaged) in the past; I use my central air unit only on very humid days. This noise continues to disrupt my sleep at night and I've had to take medication just to get what little sleep I can. I am perplexed when I see a unit of like nature on the opposite side of York Gardens. Since the current location of the new air conditioning unit was not on the original plan, I have to assume it might have been placed on the east side of York Gardens on the original plan. This noise pollution issue of York Garden's new air conditioning unit has greatly affected my quality of life and I would appreciate an expedited solution with the onset of warm, summer weather. The new unit inhibits: • use of my patio for enjoyment • my access to fresh air, and • is very disruptive to naps during the day and nighttime sleeping The new unit appears to be something that should be on top of a commercial building, not located . at ground level, especially due to the noise level. That way the noise would have some place to go with the least amount of disruption. I hope this clarifies our issue with this problem and I look forward to a solution. Regards, Genevieve Nix for Genevieve Behmen 2 'RECE V E® Susan Howl JUN 17 2011 Dear Edina City Council: We are only two votes at the election booth, however, our Edina votes will side with those who do all they can to stop this out of place project and scale it way down to fit the neighborhood. Please VOTE THAT THE PROPOSED SHELTER/COLONIAL WATER's PROJECT CHANGES (reducing 39 parking spaces, and reducing common space by 28 feet, since changing the mass) ARE REQUIRED BY ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE A PUBLIC HEARING IN FRONT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL, AND THESE CHANGES ARE MAJOR CHANGES THAT SHOULD REQUIRE THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS. The reasons the changes are major are listed below. 1. The ordinance is clear — any change in mass should go through the full public hearing process. Period. City Council should enforce the City ordinance. If one reviews Edina Ordinance 850.04, Subd. 3 (1), reproduced below, you will not see how a reduction of the proposed building by 28 feet can be considered a "minor change ". The plain wording of the ordinance states that any proposed change affecting "building coverage" or "mass" "shall be acted on., reviewed and processed by the Commission and Council in the same manner as they reviewed and processed the site plan." 2. This project is major - $30 million and 2 football fields long — and any change to it except maybe interior paint color or carpet color should be fully vetted. The project is not scheduled to break ground until spring 2012, so let's take the time to fully consider what these changes mean, all the possible impacts these changes may have on the project and the surrounding neighborhood and not rush to solely have the City Council vote on without the public hearing process, including a hearing in front of the Planning Commission too. 3. Shrinking Common Areas by 28 feet is Major: We should really know at a detail level what common areas are shrinking. Shrinking of a certain type of common areas could impact traffic, noise, etc. Again, there is nothing small about a $30 million project. `'Reduction of common spaces" is really all encompassing. Reducing of commons spaces can have impact on the number of additional trips that may need to be made. More time needs to be taken to understand these impacts. 4. Cutting 39 parking spaces is Major in this Residential Area. a. Parking was raised several times by neighbors as a concern and testimony was offered in the public hearings in 2010, both in the context of the zoning classification and in broader concerns related to the residential neighborhood. Shelter Corporation responded to these concerns by noting how much parking in excess of code they were planning on. Now these parking plans have changed, and neighbors are entitled to fully and completely understand how the parking requirements are determined, the underlying basis for the numbers presented by Shelter Corporation, the assumptions built into the parking requirement numbers (i.e. 1 spot for every 4 residents, but Shelter has stated that they will limit residency to 169. How will this be enforced? b. What about visitors? Shelter Corp. said 10 — 20 people visiting at a time, and what about employees parking? As stated in the development application, 30 to 40 employees will be driving to the location at any given time. How does this impact the parking calculation? c. Parking — the reduction in parking is a concern. They are reducing parking by 40 %, and 4% of areas earmarked for parking reduction; cutting out 39 total parking spots, "36 of the 90 underground parking, of the 73 surface spaces, 3 would be lost ". Just as a reminder, the Developer requested PRD -5 (convalescent and nursing home)due to not being able to qualify for PSR since PSR required more parking. PSR is the zoning classification that all other assisted living places in Edina are zoned. If you recall, the reason PRD- 5 was selected because the Development would not qualify for the PSR zoning classification. The Water's project is not a convalescent and nursing home as defined by code. d. There is no public transportation in this residential area so more vehicles will be brought to this area with parking demands. It appears that Shelter properties are built only in Commercial areas and the commercial areas may be able to absorb the additional parking needs. Every parking space really matters in this residential area. e. Countryside Park is expected to be upgraded, and will draw more people, which means more parking. We already have parking issues around the park. Refer to the recent Police Reports to see the problems. Some person attended a game parked in a homeowner's driveway. This compromises the safety of the homeowner's family if they had a medical emergency, not to mention that people are taking the liberty to park on private property. f. Once the building is built it will be too late to take a closer look at these questions. What is there isn't enough parking, is the neighborhood now going to have to deal with an above ground parking ramp in their residential neighborhood? g. It would also seem that a change that reduces parking to the extent stated cannot be considered minor. If this project fails, and the building needs to "reinvented" — most likely as a condo or apartment building — the lack of covered parking will be a problem. 5. Is the Parking Underground or Enclosed Parking at Grade Level? The Change Request Application states that there were "90 underground parking spaces ". In the Watershed Application, Shelter states that the parking is enclosed at grade. What is it? That is an entire story difference? What is the true height of this building from the ground of where residential neighbors will see? 6. Public Safety Regarding the Flooding of the Parking Lot: There is one thing that the Water District (WD) does not address in their rules relating to inundation of parking areas. The WD leaves those issues to the City or the facility owner /management. It has been verified by an expert hydrologist with Kevin Bigalke that the WD rules do not regulate the flooding of parking areas. Therefore, the issue would seem most appropriate for the City to address from a public safety standpoint. Part of the parking area (15 or so parking spots) could be inundated with up to two feet of water during the 100 year event (26% chance of occurring in any given year). It was pointed out with the more intense weather; the 26% could be even higher in any given year. Without some adequate precautions or emergency measures in place an individual could be at greater risk of falling in the flood water and not be able to get back up or potentially drive their car off the parking area into deeper water. This is maybe more important with elderly residents. These determinations were provided by an Expert Hydrologist that we can provide to the City. This is not only a public safety issue, when this happens we lose another 15 or so parking in the area. How will the City handle this to make sure that public safety is not an issue? 7. Other Potential City Risks and Questions. It is recommended that at Risk Mitigation Plan be established. a. What happens if there is not enough parking after all? How will the City handle this? There is no other land to build extra lots on. As mentioned above, will the residential neighborhood have to be concerned about high -rise parking ramps? b. Change Church Zoning Ordinance for Parking: As was raised before: The City of Edina is tolerating this zoning classification difference (PRD -5 convalescent nursing home, and PSR (every other assisted living in Edina are coded PSR) because they acknowledge that the zoning code is outdated. They should equally acknowledge that the parking requirements for churches [I parking stall for every 3 seats in the main sanctuary] is every bit as much out -of -date. That ordinance was created in an era when churches did not regularly sponsor large events and did not often hold concurrent activity events. These multiple events leave the parking inadequate at many of the city's churches. Major events [funerals, et al] already use the soon- to -be- vacated south parking lot, both sides of Colonial Way and on the streets such as Olinger Boulevard. The overflow can only get worse. We'll predict that the new ordinance will require more than a 1 to 3 ratio' of parking stalls to sanctuary seats - perhaps a 1 to 2 ratio' can be speculated. Please see the picture above. And when these events happen they also pour into parking on all other nearby streets. c. Another Traffic Study is being requested now by the residents in the area. One where input from the residents "on the ground can participate." It is a year later, and more is known. Let's get an accurate traffic study as many residents personally believe that the traffic will be heavier than anticipated by the developer. Will taxpayers be required to pay for additional infrastructure if needed? Or will the Developer and Church be expected to pay these expenses? Again, we are only two votes at the election booth, however, our Edina votes will side with those who do all they can to stop this out of place project and scale it way down to fit the neighborhood. Jayne & Mike Lonergan 5812 Olinger Boulevard Edina, Minnesota 55436 cell: 612 -516 -7684 or 612- 670 -9652 home: 952- 928 -0237 e -mail: mloner1Zan(a,comcast.net or pepintl(i�msn.com Susan Howl RECEO V Et JUN 17 2011 Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council members, Once again I am writing you in regard to the proposed Waters development in the Countryside neighborhood. I am a long -time resident of Edina although I live near OLG and the Grandview District, but still am concerned about the way in which the Colonial Church/Waters group has gone about this development. I fear it can be used as a precedent for other future developments in our City. What concerns me today is the request to change the plan of the building and the desire on the part of Waters to pass this change off as minor. I think the quote from Council Member Bennett in the Edina Sun is very apt in regard to a "minor ", change and bypassing approval of the Planning Commission and the Council. To me the zoning code is clear as it refers to changes in mass or building coverage. The code states that changes need to be reviewed as was the original plan. But of course, you all are more familiar with the zoning code than I am. Also the decrease in parking spots seems likely to make even worse an already bad parking situtation in the Countryside neighborhood. I have friends who have been unable to enter or leave their homes due to cars parked in their own driveways by strangers attending baseball games. That is just unacceptable and I fear that taking so much of the currently available Countryside area parking for the building will only make things worse for our friends in that area. The decrease of (I believe it is )39 spots will surely lead to more staff and residents using the available surface lots to park. Thanks for reading my thoughts and please vote to require Waters to go through the entire Planning Commission and City Council review again. Susan Keator 5041 Yvonne Terrace Edina MN 55436 952- 922 -1824 Susan Howl From: Cosgrove, William <Bill.Cosgrove @ndsu.edu > RECEIVED Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 11:44 AM To: Susan Howl Subject: Waters Project Colonial Church Request JUN 17 2011 Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, Please allow us to add our voices to those who are asking that you deny the request of the Colonial Church Waters Project to bypass a review of their requested changes by the Planning Commission and City Council. We believe that these proposed changes are not minor or superficial, and that they deserve to be looked at by the two relevant governing bodies charged with assuring responsibility in these matters, the City Council and the Planning Commission. It seems apparent on the face of it that eliminating more than three dozen parking spaces and 28 feet from the building as proposed is not minor or cosmetic and will affect the substantive use and functions of the building. Given the present high volume of traffic on Tracy Ave. and Olinger, and considering parking restrictions and problems surrounding the fire station, church, park, and residences in the immediate area, the parking spaces are of considerable concern. Moreover, it appears, too, that the relevant Edina city ordinance unequivocally calls for changes that affect the size and volume of a proposed building (losing parking spaces and 28 feet of living space would qualify here) should be reviewed by the Planning Commission and City Council in the same way they reviewed the original plan. There would seem to be no compelling reason to not do so; and doing so would thereby come closer to assuring that as fair and equitable a process as possible is being followed in what has become this very controversial matter. As we know, many citizens of Edina are interested in and watching this Shelter Corp. project, and, accordingly, opportunities for input and ideas from citizens at every step of the way are good and desirable. Indeed, citizen input via elected city officials is always valuable and often crucial in such matters affecting so many people. A flawed process can negatively affect even the most worthy of projects — and this Waters Project is not that. I believe we all want to maximize the accountability, responsibility, and quality of the process and its effects on the project as well as on the surrounding neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Best regards, Bill & Peggy Cosgrove 6104 Tracy Ave. Edina, MN 55436 Bill Cosgrove Professor Emeritus of English North Dakota State University 6104 Tracy Ave. So. Edina, MN 55436 952 - 929 -1393 bill.cosgrove @ndsu.edu �ECJEIVEI!) Susan Howl 'donorable Mayor and Respected Council Members: I -- --- -- - - -- This email is in regards to the proposed Shelter Corp. Waters Senior Housing project changes. We live at 5708 Olinger Blvd, so are directly across Countryside Park from the site of this project. We were among the many residents who were opposed to this development project to begin with, for a variety of reasons. While we understand that we will not agree with every decision the City makes, we do feel that it is important for the City to follow the review and approval process as defined. It is our understanding that any change in the mass or footprint of a development is not considered "minor" and must go through the full Planning Committee and City Council review and approval process, which includes a public hearing. Therefore, the decision to be considered before the City Council on June 21st seems pretty straightforward. Since the proposed change involves both a change in mass and a change in footprint, it should be required to go through the full review and approval process. Independent of the procedural point noted above, we are very opposed to the proposed changes due to the loss of ANY parking spaces associated with this development. We feel that the zoning classification (and by extension the parking requirements) for this project was incorrectly established at the beginning. There is an established precedence that assisted living facilities within Edina are zoned PSR. Given the definition of this zoning classification, this seems appropriate for the distribution of ages and physical ability of residents of this type of facility. However, it is our understanding that the proposed development site could not support the level of parking required by the PSR classification and therefore it was requested that this development be classified as PRD, which has a much less restrictive parking requirement. However, this classification neither agrees with the established classification of the other assisted living facilities within Edina, nor seems appropriate for the distribution of ages and physical ability of residents of this type of facility. We feel there will be a parking issue associated with this facility, even with the parking defined in the original proposal. , As a procedural note, letting the parking requirement dictate the zoning classification, rather than the zoning classification dictate the parking requirements seems like the "tail wagging the dog" and we are quite disturbed by this. Given that the zoning classification and original plan was approved by the City Council, we understand that it may be difficult to revisit this issue at this time. However, what can be done at this time is require the proposed changes to go through the full review and approval process. During this process, we would request that any loss of parking should be viewed very critically. Thank you in advance for your attention in this matter. Jed Jenkins Cindy Jenkins Susan Howl From:, Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 2:43 PM To: Cary Teague; Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: Susan Howl 7RHE E- O"E Subject: FW: Colonial Shelter 16 2011 Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 21 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 r:+ Ibiunnonci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: John St. Pierre [ mailto:jstpierre6005 @gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 20112:34 PM To: Lynette Biunno; jhovland @krausehovland.com; mbrindle @comcast.net; swensonannl @gmail.com; joshs @cbburnet.com; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; cteaaue @ci.edina.mn.us; "'and "' • Subject: Colonial Shelter My wife and I request that the changes to the Waters Development require the public hearing with the Planning Commission. It has been my personal experience working in the architectural /engineering profession that apparently minor changes can and often do create unexpected results. It is also apparent that previous city councils had similar experiences and planned for this contingency in the writing of Section 850.04 of the zoning code. Please defer to your predecessors advice and vote not to proceed with the revised design until it has been properly reviewed. Respectfully, John & Jeanne St. Pierre 6005 Arbour Lane Edina, MN 55436 (952) 929 -0175 0stpierre6005Pgmail.com 1 VVINC THE MION`DE LHMST' Catholic Church 8 June 2011 Mayor James Hovland Edina City Hall 4801 W 50" St Edina, MN 55424 t Office of the Pasto:- JUN 0 9 2011 RE: Agenda Item VII a: Request For Minor Changes To Building — Waters Senior Housing Project Dear Mayor Hovland, I am writing in support of the Waters Senior Housing Project modifications and asking that the council approve their request to include 7 affordable housing units. The research conducted by the Waters project demonstrates over 30% of Edina Seniors qualify for affordable housing; over 3000 of our senior residents. As the pastor of Our.Lady of Grace Catholic Church, I believe it is imperative that we care for our seniors, seniors that built this community, raised their families in this community and supported Edina to make it the strong, healthy vibrant community it is today. The Waters project modification is a small but significant step to acknowledge the needs of seniors in our community and to give back to those who have given so much. Sincerely,.` f � Fr Robert SchwarLGracelic Pastor, Our Lady Church Cc David Holm, Director of Spiritual Services, The Waters Senior Living Joni Bennett, Edina City Council Mary Brindle, Edina City Council Josh Sprague, Edina City Council Ann Swenson, Edina City Council 5071 Eden Avenue Edina. MIN 55436 (F) 952- 929 -331 7 frhnhsOvol gnarl sn.org (F) 952-929-4612) Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 1:43 PM To: Susan Howl Subject: FW: TO THE HONORABLE Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, and Ann Swenson =ECEOVE Lynette Biunno, Receptionist N 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunnoeci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com For Li%utg, I,eacning, R3L +'(ilo Families 6i Doing Business From: Annie Krogan [mailto:ceilidh @sasktel.net] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 7:4.6 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: TO THE HONORABLE Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, and Ann Swenson Dear councillors, Im asking you to please reconsider using traps to catch and kill coyotes. Traps are very cruel, akin to torture as the animal is restrained in terror and pain. Traps are also very dangerous, as anything can become caught in one. Please show you are compassionate human beings representing a compassionate community by choosing a humane alternative to traps. Yours respectfully, Annie Krogan Susan Howl "- From: Lynette Biunno JUN 0 9 2011 Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 3:15 PM ro: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Trapping Coyotes '_ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927- 8861 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(@ci.edina.mn.us i www.CitvofEdina.com J For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Kathy Dunn [mailto:lilbitdunn @yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 2:52 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Trapping Coyotes To Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, and Ann Swenson, Edina City Council: Steel jaw traps, even rubber- coated ones, cause immense pain and injury. Terrified, the trapped animals are further injured in their frantic struggle to get free. Bones snap, flesh tears, and many victims chew or twist off their own limbs in order to escape. These traps are also indiscriminant. Any animal, including beloved companion animals, can fall prey. I am politely urging the Edina city officials to oppose all cruel trapping efforts. Live traps are the humane way to relocate these creatures of whom with city spraul, have no option at this point but to dwell in our city(s) because we took their homes and livelihoods and food source(s) in the first place. Thank you. Kathy D. Susan Howl Imp High From: Lori Krzmarzick [mailto:ljk @mcmlaw.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20112:51 PM To: James Hovland; Lynette Biunno Subject: Please Oppose Cruel Steel -Jaw Traps to Catch and Kill Coyotes Importance: High Dear Sirs, E C E JUN 0 9 2011 I understand that the City of Edina is considering using cruel steel jaw traps to catch and kill coyotes. Steel jaw traps, even rubber- coated ones, cause immense pain and injury. Terrified, the trapped animals are further injured in their frantic struggle to get free. Bones snap, flesh tears, and many victims chew or twist off their own limbs in order to escape. These traps are also indiscriminant. Any animal, including beloved companion animals, can fall prey. I respectfully request that you oppose all cruel trapping methods. Thank you. Lori J. Krzmarzick Paralegal 612.305.1571 jkgmcmlaw.com Mackall, Crounse & Moore, PLC 1400 AT &T Tower 901 Marquette Ave Minneapolis, MN 55402 Main: 612.305.1400 Fax: 612.305.1414 Web: www.mcmlaw.com K 11NEFjATLAWU 1 Susan Hawl JUN 0 9 2011 From: Mike and Jill Retrum [maiIto: retrum2004 @yahoo.com] - - - - - - - - - - - - Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20112:52 PM To: James Hovland; Lynette Biunno Subject: Coyotes I have heard through several news sources, that the city of Edina is considering using steel traps, firearms and poison, to trap and kill coyotes. Its very disappointing that killing the coyotes, for something that land developers and construction companies are partially at fault for, is the solution to your problem. I understand this is a concern for those who have small animals etc., but there has to be a better solution than possibly inflicting a slow, excruciating, painful death on these animals, who have found themselves in Edina by no fault of their own. I understand that builders and Land Developers bring in revenue for the cities but what about charging a fee when land is developed, to have someone accountable for relocation the animals who live on that land, to a more suitable situation. Im not some radical animal rights activist, Im just a person who lives in the cities and has watched year after year, what was once a beautiful place, become over run with housing developments, on every single inch of land there is. Its not surprising to me at all there is a coyote problem, where are they supposed to go? You are the "leaders" please come up with a better sloution. Thanks, Jill Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 3:16 PM To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: To The Honorable Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, and Ann Swenson... Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. 1^ Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 -826 -0389 Ibiunno(cDci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Devin Blanks [mailto:devinblanks @gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20112:51 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: To The Honorable Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, and Ann Swenson... Dear Edina City Council Officials, 9 2011 I politely urge you and the Edina city officials to please oppose all cruel trapping efforts. Steel jaw traps, even rubber- coated ones, cause immense pain and injury. Terrified, the trapped animals are further injured in their frantic struggle to get free. Bones snap, flesh tears, and many victims chew or twist off their own limbs in order to escape. Furthermore, these traps are also indiscriminant. Any animal, including my wonderful blue Weimaraner, Apollo, can be trapped in them. Hundreds of animal- loving pet owners like myself would like to see a much more humane solution to controlling the coyote population. What is currently being done is inhumane and horrible. We are better than that. Thank you for your time. Devin Blanks Susan Howl - --• - v LN11 From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 3:22 PM To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: To The Honorable Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, and Ann Swenson. Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(cD_ci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Dieing Business From: Natascha Alex [mailto:nataschaalex @gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 2:56 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: To The Honorable Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, and Ann Swenson. Dear Edina City Council Officials, politely urge you and the Edina city officials to please oppose all cruel trapping efforts. Steel -jaw traps, even rubber - coated ones, cause immense pain and injury. Terrified, the trapped animals are further injured in their frantic struggle to get free. Bones snap, flesh tears, and many victims chew or twist off their own limbs in order to escape. Furthermore, these traps are also indiscriminant. Any animal, including my wonderful blue Weimaraner, Apollo, can be trapped in them. Hundreds of animal - loving pet owners like myself would like to see a much more humane solution to controlling the coyote population. What is currently being done is inhumane and horrible. We are better than that. Thank you for your time. Natascha 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 3:19 PM To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: [� (CUVED JUN 0 9 2011 Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunnoaci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Facnil.ies S Doing Bwginess From: kat [mailto:katmullin83 @gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20112:54 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Please oppose cruel methods of trapping coyotes. I think we can all agree that no animal deserves to suffer. Lets meet in the middle and trap them humanely, we have the means so it is our moral duty to use it. Thank you. 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno C LS O V E R 'ent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 3:26 PM I o: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl JUN 0 9 2011 Subject: FW: please read Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist B , 1;'r' 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno ti.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com JUR/ —` For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: JULIE RETTIG [mailto:julesart@702com.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20113:06 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: please read Honorable Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, and Ann Swenson, I understand that the city of Edina is considering using steel jaw traps to catch and kill coyotes. Steel -jaw traps, even rubber - coated ones, cause immense pain and injury. Terrified, the trapped'animals are further injured in their frantic struggle to get free. Bones snap, flesh tears, and many victims chew or twist off their own limbs in order to escape. These traps are also indiscriminant. Any animal, including beloved companion animals, can fall prey. This actually happened to my cat, Phoenix, she didn't come home one nite and that was not like her. The next day, I heard meowing in the shrubs by the house and here she was caught in a steel jaw trap set by the neighbor to catch rabbits. Her leg was shredded. It was horrible, I will never forget it. She survived but it is such a cruel way to die. Please reconsider a more humane option. Thank you. Julie Rettig Susan Howl From: Sent: Lynette Biunno Wednesday, June 08, 2011 3:24 PM /� 2 // 2 E E To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long u u V L� D Cc: Subject: Susan Howl FW: Coyotes JUN 0 9 2011 Hello there, - - This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long <'< Lynette Biunno, Receptionist ' 952-927-8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 c Ibiunno(cD-ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Koenig, James E (DIPS) [ma ilto James.e.koenig @state.mn.us] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20112:59 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Coyotes Dear Joni, Mary, Josh and Ann Don't use intrusive measures to kill coyotes. Claw traps break bones and cause a lot of pain. Edina residents can use preventive measures to protect their pets. Coyotes stay away from humans by nature. Try getting advice from an organization like Defenders of Wildlife (800- 385 -9712) about preventive measures to discourage coyotes. The Minnesota Zoo (952- 431 -9217) has coyotes, on its Minnesota Trail so they might have suggestions also. The zoo also has Timber wolves and Mexican wolves, which are similiar. Jim Koenig 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno r E V E D Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 3:50 PM o: Cc: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Susan Howl JUN 0 9 2011 Subject: FW: Coyotes Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 81 : -5`i": 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(fti.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com L ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families Doing Business From: Antje Gottert [mailto:ant e.go @googlemail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20113:43 PM To: James Hovland; Lynette Biunno Subject: Coyotes Hello, please don't catch and kill coyotes. They are wild animals and we have to respect them as a part of the Creation. Sincerely, Antj e Gottert Susan Howl Importance: High From Patricia D. Peterson [mailto:pdp @mcmlaw.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20113:35 PM ----=---- - - - - -- To: James Hovland; Lynette Biunno Subject: Please Oppose Cruel Steel -Jaw Traps to Catch and Kill Coyotes Importance: High Dear Sirs, I am HORRIFIED and APPALLED that the City of Edina is considering using cruel steel -jaw traps to catch and kill coyotes. Steel -jaw traps cause horrific pain and injury and are viewed by civilized regions to be INHUMANE. In addition, companion pets and other wildlife frequently fall victims to these traps. God forbid a child should happen upon one or an adult stumble into one. I respectfully request that you oppose steel -jaw traps and explore alternative HUMANE methods to eliminate coyotes. Patricia D. Peterson Paralegal 612.305.1533 pdp(a�mcmlaw.com Mackall, Crounse & Moore, PLC 1400 AT &T Tower 901 Marquette Ave Minneapolis, MN 55402 Main: 612.305.1400 Fax: 612.305.1414 Web: www.memlaw.com r -a--, SkIWA CAY4TItNETS AT LAW 1 + Susan Howl �. JUN 0 9 2011 From: falk parra [mailto:falkf parrs @hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20113:56 PM To: James Hovland; Lynette Biunno Subject: Coyote Traps The Honorable Jim Hovland Mayor of Edina The Honorable Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, and Ann Swenson Edina City Council Dear Sirs, I would like to hereby kindly draw your attention to the planned use of steel -jaw traps to catch and kill coyotes by the city of Edina. This measure causes severe and unnecessary pain and suffering for the coyotes, and puts any other animals at risk who happen to come across those traps. I therefore urge you to stop these cruel measures, which you have the power to do. Best wishes, Falk Bing 1 Susan Howl �r�aO JUN From: neil cosgrove [mailto:neiljoecos @hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20113:51 PM To: James Hovland Cc: Lynette Biunno Subject: Leg hold traps. Dear Mr. Hovland and City Council, I just became aware of the horrifying news that you are considering using steel jaw traps to catch and kill coyotes. These traps cause immense pain and suffering to any animal caught in its hold and I urge you not to use this barbaric method. So much cruelty is directed at animals in this world and I hope you won't add to that by using cruel steel jaw traps. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Neil J. Cosgrove 804 Smith Avenue St. Paul, MN 55107 1 Susan Howl JUN 0 9 2011 From: nancy smith <nlmsmith(d_)comcast.net> Date: June 8, 2011 3:56:50 PM CDT To: edinamail(a)ci.edina.mn.us Subject: Steel Traps To Catch And Kill Wolves TO: The Honorable Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, and Ann Swenson EDINA CITY COUNCIL Dear Council Members, I understand that the City of Edina is considering the use of steel -jaw traps to catch and kill wolves. These traps, even if rubber - coated cause horrific pain and injury. The animals are terrified and struggle frantically to free themselves. In the process, they tear their flesh, bones snap, and many twist or chew off their own limbs desperately trying to escape. I am asking that you oppose any and all trapping efforts. While this type of method was used in the late 16th century, my hope is that we have progressed way beyond this cruel and torturous method by now in the year 2011. Animals need our help and consideration. They are only trying to subsist and live their lives, as we are. We have encroached farther and farther into their territory, not the other way around. We can at least help them to live out their lives in peace and harmony with us. They deserve nothing less. Please - oppose these horrific trapping methods. Thank You. Sincerely, Nancy L. Smith PETA Member Minneapolis, Minnesota Susan JUN 0 9 2011 From: nancy smith [mailto:nlmsmith @comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20113:57 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Steel Traps To Catch And Kill Wolves TO: The Honorable Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, and Ann Swenson ' EDINA CITY COUNCIL Dear Council Members, I understand that the City of Edina is considering the use of steel -jaw traps to catch and kill wolves. These traps, even if rubber - coated cause horrific pain and injury. The animals are terrified and struggle frantically to free themselves. In the process, they tear their flesh, bones snap, and many twist or chew off their own limbs desperately trying to escape. I am asking that you oppose any and all trapping efforts. While this type of method was used in the late 16th century, my hope is that we have progressed way beyond this cruel and torturous method by now in the year 2011. Animals need our help and consideration. They are only trying to subsist and live their lives, as we are. We have encroached farther and farther into their territory, not the other way around. We can at least help them to live out their lives in peace and harmony with us. They deserve nothing less. Please - oppose these horrific trapping methods. Thank You. Sincerely, Nancy L. Smith PETA Member Minneapolis, Minnesota Susan Howl _ Biunno 22 // 22 j� FR EC E � V E ID From: Lynette Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 8:26 AM To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long JUN 0 9 2011 Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: cruel animal trapping Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 Fax 952-826-03139 fIbiunnoCaaci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: jpallansch @northcentralco.com [ mailto :JPallansch @northcentralco.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20114:32 PM To: James Hovland; Lynette Biunno Subject: cruel animal trapping According to news sources, the city of Edina is considering, using cruel steel -Jaw, traps to catch and kill coyotes. Steel jaw traps, even rubber- coated ones, cause immense pain and injury. Terrified, the trapped animals are further injured in their frantic struggle to get free. Bones snap, flesh tears, and many victims chew or twist off their own limbs in order to escape. These traps are also indiscriminant. Any animal, including beloved companion animals, can fall prey. Thank you, Jessica Pallansch Susan Howl ' From: Gordon, Jamie [mailto:jlgordon @aii.edu] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20114:16 PM To: Lynette Biunno; James Hovland Subject: Cruel Trapping City of Edina Officials: PT CMVED JUN U 9 2011 Steel -jaw traps, even rubber - coated ones, cause immense pain and injury. Terrified, the trapped animals are further injured in their frantic struggle to get free. Bones snap, flesh tears, and many victims chew or twist off their own limbs in order to escape. These traps are also indiscriminant. Any animal, including beloved companion animals, can fall prey. Please oppose all cruel trapping efforts! Thank you! Sincerely, Jamie Gordon Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 2:45 PM Cc: Susan Howl RECEVED Subject: FW: Cruel Trapping JUN 0 9 2011. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 IbiunnoC&ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Tara Cross [mailto:Tara.Cross @katun.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20112:07 PM To: Lynette Biunno; James Hovland Cc: jlgordon @aii.edu Subject: Cruel Trapping City of Edina Officials: Steel -jaw traps, even rubber - coated ones, cause immense pain and injury. Terrified, the trapped animals are further injured in their frantic struggle to get free. Bones snap, flesh tears, and many victims chew or twist off their own limbs in order to escape. These traps are also indiscriminant. Any animal, including_ beloved companion animals, can fall prey. Please oppose all cruel trapping efforts! Thank you! Sincerely, Tara Cross Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno I R E CE WE D Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 2:38 PM To: Jeff Long; Scott Neal JUN 0 9 2011 Cc: Susan Howl i Subject: FW: Comment - Trapping Animals I Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. r Lynette Biunno, Receptionist +� 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 j, IbiunnoCcDci.edina.mmus I www.CitvofEdina.com f ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Thomas Cole [ma i Ito: drdoolittle2800 @gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20112:13 PM To: James Hovland; Lynette Biunno Cc: 1 -File (Record Keeping) Subject: Comment - Trapping Animals Dear Mayor and Council Members: Please oppose all cruel trapping efforts. There are better means available. Did you know that the presence of dogs in neighborhoods keeps encroaching coyotes in abeyance? Steel jaw traps, even rubber- coated ones, cause immense pain and injury. Terrified, the trapped animals are further injured in their frantic struggle to get free. Bones snap, flesh tears, and many victims chew or twist off their own limbs in order to escape. These traps are also indiscriminant. Any animal, including family pets can fall prey. As a former Edina resident I ask you to please show Minnesotans that Edinans are more compassionate and progressive than what this proposal indicates. This is too barbaric fror the great city of Edina. Let your compassionate leadership show us a better way. Sincerel National Shelter Reform Advocate T (651) 480 -8280 thomas @shelterrevolution.ord ro.I,t' - My profiles: I CMi`.� Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 2:50 PM JUN 0 9 2011 To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: coyote trapping _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. i Lynette Biunno, Receptionist fit? X, 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 X Ibiunno((Dci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: heidiupl @aol.com [mailto:heidiupl @aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 2:26 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: coyote trapping Please reconsider the use of steel traps - -there are less cruel methods. Thank you, Heidi Uppgaard 5509 s 38th ave minneapolis, mn 55417 (I grew up in Edina.) Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno IIIV 0 Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 2:48 PM JUN 9 2011 To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Subject: FW: Steel traps in Edina — — "' Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 l fir..: IbiunnoCrDci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Jon N. Brelie [mailto:jbrelie @gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 2:26 PM To: James Hovland; Lynette Biunno Subject: Steel traps in Edina All, It's come to my attention that the city of Edina is considering using steel jaw traps to combat the coyote population within the city limits. I grew up in northern MN and have encountered animals trapped in devices like these on more than one occasion. Every single time, I was forced to end the suffering of the animal because I could not get close enough to release it. Even if I could, they all would have died a slow death as a result of their injuries. The suffering that these traps cause is truly horrible to witness and, I would imagine, even worse to experience. I'm begging you to consider other methods. There are better methods that are equally effective but far more humane. Cage traps, for instance would at least allow you to see if the animal you catch is your intended target before euthanizing it. That way you won't kill any of your constituents' pets and can ensure that the coyotes you do catch are dealt with humanely. Thank you. Jon Brelie Minneapolis MN Susan Hawl U- UvL,V From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 2:54 PM JUN 0 9 2011 To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Please halt plans to trap coyotes ' ' ' ' ' — — — — — — — — — — Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. _ Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(fti.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Cassie Smyser [ mailto:cassielynne27 @gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20112:33 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Please halt plans to trap coyotes To Edina City Council Members, I wanted to write to you and urge you to please stop your plans to trap coyotes in the City of Edina. The steel - draw traps are a cruel and inhumane way to trap these animals. These traps can cause immense pain and injury for the coyotes. In addition, any animal, including beloved companion animals and other wildlife can fall prey to the steel -draw traps. As a Minnesota resident, I urge you to please reconsider your course of action and halt your plans to trap coyotes. Thank you, Cassandra Smyser 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 2:51 PM JUN 0 9 2011 To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl — — — — — — Subject: FW: Coyote Trapping — — — — — — — Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long -'< Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 i Fax 952 - 826 -0389 ,f.. IbiunnocWci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Leenlev @cs.com [mailto:Leenlev @cs.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20112:33 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Coyote Trapping While I understand the concerns of a growing coyote population, the use of steel jaw traps is not the answer, especially in a suburban location. The cruelty of these traps should be enough to ban their use, but even worse is that non target animals and even children can be caught. Please look for other solutions that are safer for the area and more humane for the coyotes. Eileen Levin 1 Susan Howl From: kristin @grandciel.com [mailto:kristin @grandciel.com] JUN 0 9 2011 Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20112:37 PM To: James Hovland Cc: Lynette Biunno -- - " "-- Subject: Edina's Policy for Trapping Coyotes Dear Honorable Jim Hovland and Honorable Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, and Ann Swenson, I understand that the City of Edina is considering using traps to capture and kill wild coyotes. This is an inhumane and unwise action. Here's why: Steel jaw traps, even rubber- coated ones, cause immense pain and injury. Terrified, the trapped animals are further injured in their frantic struggle to get free. Bones snap, flesh tears, and many victims chew or twist off their own limbs in order to escape. These traps are indiscriminant. Any animal, including family pets, can fall prey. Coyotes are a natural part of the ecosystem. They play their part in keeping other animal populations in check and keeping a natural balance. Unfortunately, we continue to expand our cities and suburbs that encroach on coyote territories. It's not the coyotes' fault, so why destroy them? A more humane measure would be to live trap coyotes and relocate them outside city limits. I know, more expense and time to do so, but it is the decent, humane way. I don't live in Edina, yet I'm very conserned about the welfare of our natural resources and wildlife in this state and our country. Please consider a humane option for the coyote. Sincerely, Ms. K Peterson Burnsville i Susan Howl -- ou v &;LJ From: Lynette Biunno LJUN 0 9 Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 2:56 PM 201 To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl - - - - -_ Subject: FW: Steel Traps in Edina ' " — — Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(aci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ' ...Fvr Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Joanna Wallace [ma i Ito: miss u psetter@ya hoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20112:33 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Steel Traps in Edina To Whom It May Concern: I am alarmed by the idea of steel traps and firearms being used to control coyotes in the city of Edina. Steel traps are inhumane and cause severe pain to ANY living creature. Steel traps cannot choose what they trap, so this is also putting humans and companion animals at risk. I feel that there are better ways to control coyotes and I urge you to explore those methods. Thank you for your time, Joanna Wallace i 'Susan Howl From: Sent: Lynette Biunno Wednesday, June 08, 2011 3:02 PM (� r1 R EC E 0 V �p E V To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl JUN 0 9 2011 Subject: FW: PLEASE! Do not trap Coyotes with Steel Jaw Traps! Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. %== Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunnopci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ...For Lining. Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Jen Sharlow [mailto:jensharlow @msn.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20112:39 PM To: Lynette Biunno; James Hovland Subject: PLEASE! Do not trap Coyotes with Steel Jaw Traps! To the respectful citizens of Edina Minnesota; Today, I ask you to choose compassion over cruelty. In a day and age where so many non -cruel options are available, I beg you to do more research before you use steel jaw traps. Although the Coyotes have become, in your words, "A nuisance ", they are still living, breathing, feeling creatures full of life. They love, feel and make decisions, just like you or I. And even though they are wild animals, they still feel pain and deserve the respect of not suffering! Steel -jaw traps, even rubber - coated ones, cause immense pain and injury. Terrified, the trapped animals are further injured in their frantic struggle to get free. Bones snap, flesh tears, and many victims chew or twist off their own limbs in order to escape. These traps are also indiscriminant. Any animal, including companion animals can fall prey. I, too, am a Minnesota resident. I have worked in Edina and I enjoy the city. I can honestly say, that should this trapping go on, I will no longer be a patron of your City. Thank you for taking the time to read what I had to say on the matter. Sincerest Regards, Jennifer Sharlow Susan Howl I JUN 0 9 2011 From: Lori [mailto:LoriH @campbell - hogue.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 2:37 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: hmm trapping of coyotes No disrespect meant but I really would have thought that Edina of all places was beyond barbaric remedies such as this when trying to fix a problem. Your city is a well known city of cities in the eyes of the Twin Citiens from all over ... ( I grew up in Hopkins and currently reside in Mtka) so I should know how well known "Edina" is. I also know how your city has made it a point of being a leader in quality ideas and how your pristine communities reflect that pride. I for one love your areas and would hate for the city of Edina to be known as the city that cruelly trapped and killed multiple animals, not just coyotes, because we all know that your intended victim will not be the only one caught in your traps. I am sure with the amazing group of people that run your city a more humane and safe method can be thought of in order to take care in helping to relocate the coyotes that live in your area. By making a change on this venue you will not only be setting an example of responsible choice making but also showing other communities how important it is to preserve our small and ever fading wild life population and in findings ways to move them to a safer area where they to can continue to live with their families in peace. After all that is what Edina has emphasized for years family, community safety.... Hmm give it some thought. I,fr'i lfuoluri Tel 09521 _/W_108.1 I08.1 Fdx: ttl` J .3804900 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 3:11 PM To: Cc: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Susan Howl 1� R EC E WE Subject: FW: Steel -Jaw Traps JUN 0 9 2011 Hello there, ' This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long Lynette Biunno, Receptionist -' 952- 927 -8861 i Fax 952 - 826 -0389 ylf' Ibiunno(")a ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Katie Blaul [mailto:kblaul2l @gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20112:47 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Steel -Jaw Traps Honorable Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, and Ann Swenson: Please oppose steel -jaw traps, even rubber- coated ones, which cause immense pain and injury to catch and kill coyotes. Terrified, the trapped animals are further injured in their frantic struggle to get free. Bones snap, flesh tears, and many victims chew or twist off their own limbs in order to escape. Best Regards, Katie Blau] Susan Howl From: Sent: Lynette Biunno Wednesday, June 08, 2011 3:04 PM � E C E � 0 V /f E l5 LC: To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Subject: Susan Howl FW: Inhumane trapping of coyotes JUN 0 9 2011 Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno @ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Susan Ricketts [mailto:skrick200l @gmaii.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20112:41 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Inhumane trapping of coyotes To the Edina City Council, I recently found out that the city of Edina is considering using cruel steel -jaw traps to catch and kill coyotes. Steel -jaw traps, even rubber - coated ones, cause immense pain and injury. Terrified, the trapped animals are further injured in their frantic struggle to get free. Bones snap, flesh tears, and many victims chew or twist off their own limbs in order to escape. These traps are also indiscriminant. Any animal, including companion animals, can fall prey. Please find a more humane way to control the coyote population. Respectfully, Susan Ricketts Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 8:42 AM To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Cruel Coyote Traps Hello there, RECEFVVED ED JUN 0 9 2011 This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 f_ IbiunnoCmci.edina.mn.us i www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Michael Willemsen [mailto:michael_willemsen @yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20114:54 PM To: Lynette Biunno; James Hovland Subject: Cruel Coyote Traps Dear Honorable Mayor Jim Hovland and Honorable Edina City Council Persons, I am deeply distressed by your consideration of using Steel -Jaw traps to maim and kill Coyotes. I can think of much better ways to control your Coyote problems that are not cruel in nature and do not risk other animals (including our pets) from falling prey to these vicious traps! Farmers need to protect their own land by the non - lethal use of fences, guard animals, and repulsive smells. Scientific studies have showen that these traps do not work. Nor does killing coyotes. On the contrary the ones that do get trapped or killed by humans are going to be the weak and less intelligent ones, thus creating more abundent resources and a much better genetic gene pool for future breeding generations of coyotes. Please think through this decision carefully. Needless suffering for non -human animals is not the answer. Sincerely, Michael Willemsen Susan Howl It From: Sent: Lynette Biunno June Thursday, June 09, 2011 8:47 AM EC E � E To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long V Cc: Susan Howl e 2011 JUN O Subject: FW: (no subject) J Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long Lynette Biunno, Receptionist A 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 Ibiunnoa,ci.edina.mn.us I Hhk e,.CityofEdina,com ...For Living, Learnirig, Raising Families & Doing Business From: gerrose3 @aol.com [mailto:gerrose3 @aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 5:11 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: (no subject) I need more information as to how Edina plans to reduce the coyote population. I have heard that they plan to use steel -jaw traps, and even rubber - coated ones cause immense pain and injury. Terrified, the trapped animals are further injured in their frantic struggle to get free. Bones snap, flesh tears, and many victims chew or twist off their own limbs in order to escape. I think that wildlife management companies could provide an appropriate method to control the coyote population without pain and suffering for the animal. Steel -jaw traps would be a very poor option. I hope the Edina City Council will take a more civil approach to this problem. Thank you, 56 Gerry Rosenberg Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno [ffE 7CE p�2 ,ent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 9:01 AM V LS o: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl 9 2011 Subject: FW: oppose all cruel trapping efforts. t Hi there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. �y Lynette Biunno, Receptionist {ci �..'. 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 r_ Ibiunno0ci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing-Business From: Victor Khayat [ mailto :victorkhayat @hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20115:16 PM To: James Hovland; Lynette Biunno Subject: oppose all cruel trapping efforts. Dear officials, I would encourage you to oppose all cruel trapping efforts for the coyotes. Steel jaw traps are indiscriminate and can injure animals other than those intended for capture such as dogs, cats, etc. There are better more humane ways to deal with animal over populations. We need to use proven scientific methods to help decrease wild animal conflicts with human populations. Trapping and killing animals with outdated jaw trap technology is cruel and unnecessary. Please oppose all cruel trapping efforts and use more scientific methods. Thank you. Regards, Victor Khayat MD Major USAR Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno E r� 2 Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 8:44 AM W ECG WE D To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: plese oppose all cruel trapping efforts JUN 0 9 2011 Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist L' , 1 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 lk -3) Ibiunno(fti.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & DoinF Business From: rosamondharriet @aol.com [mailto:rosamondharriet @aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 5:05 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: plese oppose all cruel trapping efforts Steel -jaw traps, even rubber - coated ones, cause immense pain and injury. Terrified, the trapped animals are further injured in their frantic struggle to get free. Bones snap, flesh tears, and many victims chew or twist off their own limbs in order to escape. These traps are also indiscriminant. Any animal, including beloved companion animals, can fall prey. I politely urge Edina city officials to oppose all cruel trapping efforts. From, Ann Thomes 4 generations living in Edina Susan Howl From: Amanda Ladyha [mailto:petluvrmn @yahoo.com] n Lr- %.# lh u V = L�l Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 5:24 PM JUN 0 9 2011 To: James Hovland; Lynette Biunno Subject: TRAPPING COYOTES To whom it may concern: According to many news sources, the city of Edina is considering using cruel steel jaw traps to catch and kill coyotes. Both the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) and the American Animal Hospital Association have declared the steel jaw leghold trap to be inhumane. What does it do to the animal? Animals caught by the heavy steel jaws of the leghold trap suffer excruciating pain on impact; the trap can tear the flesh, cut tendons and ligaments, and break bones. When the animals struggle to free themselves, they aggravate their injuries. A trapped animal often chews or twists off the limb caught in the trap in an effort to escape -29 percent of the raccoons observed in one study did this. Some traps have "teeth" on the jaws, which add to the physical trauma. Trapped animals may struggle in pain for days. Dehydration, blood loss, hypothermia, and predation by other animals may claim their lives before the trapper returns. Standard methods of killing trapped animals include clubbing with a shovel or metal pipe and standing on the chest to cause suffocation. A number of state - issued trapping manuals aimed at young and novice trappers recommend these techniques. These traps are cruel and they are also indiscriminant. Any animal, including beloved companion animals, can fall prey. I strongly urge you to continue to look for non - lethal options to help control the coyote population! Amanda Ladyha Chaska, MN "Choose being kind over being right and you'll be right every time." Susan Howl . From: Bunny Homa [mailto:kikirmoondo @ msn.com] JUN 0 9 2011 Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20115:19 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: FW: Coyote Removal Inhumane, please consider other options! City of Edina Council Members, Please see letter below voicing my concern and others in our community about the methods of eliminating the coyotes. Thank you! From: kikirmoondo @msn.com To: jhoviand @ci.edina.mn.us Subject: Coyote Removal Inhumane, please consider other options! Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 17:11:31 -0500 Mayor Hovland, I live in West Bloomington and have seen coyotes in my area too. As much as I'm concerned, I believe there must be a safer and more humane way to remove these animals. Steel -jaw traps, even rubber - coated ones, cause immense pain and injury. Terrified, the trapped animals are further injured in their frantic struggle to get free. Bones snap, flesh tears, and many victims chew or twist off their own limbs in order to escape. These traps are also indiscriminant. Any animal, including our beloved companion animals can fall prey. Please reconsider this method! Thank you, Bunny R. Homa Concerned Citizen Susan Howl crom: Lynette Biunno ent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 9:25 AM � ECEWED I o; Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl Subject: F1N: Coyotes I JUN 0 9 2011 Hello there, I - - - - - - - - - - - - - This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long Lynette Biunno, Receptionist el '' 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 IbiunnoQci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com tt ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: mandy h [ mailto :handymandy28 @hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20116:14 PM To: James Hovland; Lynette Biunno Subject: Coyotes To whom it may concern, My name is Mandy Hanson and I am a resident of Plymouth, MN. I was shocked to hear that the city of Edina is considering using steel jaw traps to catch and kill coyotes. I am aware that the coyote population is spreading into residential areas and putting small dogs and cats in danger of being killed in people's yards. This breaks my heart but I am sure we could find a less cruel solution to this issue than inhumane traps that a child or dog could easily step on by mistake. Please consider less cruel ways of solving this issue like humane catch and release methods or simply educating residents on how the keeps family and pets safe. Thank you, Mandy Hanson Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 9:20 AM � pp To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long I R E C E � V E © ^ I Cc: Susan Howl "" Subject: FVV: Coyote Trapping I JUN 0 9 2011 Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 �. IbiunnoCcDci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com S-7 ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: MacRae, Stephanie L [mailto: Stephanie. MacRae @allina.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 5:32 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Coyote Trapping Greetings, I am a concerned citizen of Minnesota who is respectfully asking that you oppose any and all coyote trapping efforts. These traps are cruel and inhumane and also pose a risk to companion animals and humans. Thank you very much for taking the time to read my message. Sincerely, Stephanie MacRae Minneapolis, MN This message contains information that is confidential and may be privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e -mail and delete the message. 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno 'R EC E Q Vv E Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 9:33 AM To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long ,UN 0 9 2011 Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: trapping coyotes Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. ` Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunnoaci.edina.mn.us i www.CitvofEdina.com For Living, Learning, Raising Families S Doing Business From: Luana [mailto:luanajw @aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 7:24 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: trapping coyotes City Council members, am very upset to hear or your plans to trap coyotes. If they are truely causing problems and must be thinned, you need to find a more humane way of doing this. Live traps, poisoning,etc. are all barbaric methods we are better than that. Other innocent animals suffer from these methods also. If you must kill these animals you must do it humanely. Please don't upset so many of us by taking the easy, cheap way out even though it is not the right way to do this, we are more sophisticated than the pioneers were. We need to act more sophisticated, evolution has a purpose. Sorry if I have come across rude, but this REALLY upsets me!! Thank you for your time and I hope you will reconsider your plans. Best regards, Luana Whiteis 4940 H Underwood Lane N Plymouth, MN 55442 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 9:28 AM ^ �� � �� To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long R4 Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: I IAN 0 9 2011 Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist f!� 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(fti.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: toddlboeing727 @juno.com [mailto:toddlboeing727 @juno.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20116:13 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: The Honorable Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, and Ann Swenson Edina City Council, I urge you to not allow cruel and torturous trapping of Coyotes! Thank You, Todd Lewandoski Groupon.com Official Site 1 huge daily deal on the best stuff to do in your city. Try it today! Groupon.com Susan Howl From: Sent: Lynette Biunno Thursday, June 09, 2011 9:42 AM 2 R EC E WE To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl JUN 0 9 2011 Subject: FW: Traps Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 IbiunnoCrDci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families C Doing Business From: STACY RUSE [mailto:stacymarek @yahoo.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20117:51 PM To: James Hovland; Lynette Biunno Subject: Traps Please do not use harmful traps, or anything that will cause undue harm or permanent damage to coyotes or other animals that may fall prey. These lands also belong to the animals, and other more humane means can be used. Thanks for your support and consideration, Stacy Ruse 12081 94th Ave N Maple Grove, MN 55369 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 9:36 AM �� OR v „� I To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Edina Coyote Issue .I JUN 0 9 2011 Hello there, 1.- ------------ This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 Ibiunno(cDci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Noelle McCleaf [ma ilto : noel lelmccleaf @gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 7:30 PM To: James Hovland; Lynette Biunno Subject: Edina Coyote Issue Dear Jim Hovland, As a resident of Minnesota I am concerned about the city of Edina using steel jaw traps to catch and kill coyotes. Other animals can be caught in the traps, and this is a cruel and inhumane way to deal with the problem. Please consider other methods than barbaric steel traps. Thank you for listening, Noelle McCleaf Susan Howl crom: Lynette Biunno [IPECEVVIED ent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 9:51 AM p: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl JUN 0 9 2011 Subject: Fw: Please Adopt Modern Humane Methods and Stop Plans to Trap Coyotes Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long = Lynette Biunno, Receptionist r 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 lti[ Ibiunnoaci.edina.mmus I www.CitvofEdina.com For Luring, Learning, Raising Families Si Doing Business From: Sadie Schrader [mailto :sadie.schrader @hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20118:53 PM To: James Hovland; Lynette Biunno Subject: Please Adopt Modern Humane Methods and Stop Plans to Trap Coyotes Dear Honorable Mayor Hovland and Honorable Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, and Ann Swenson Humans and animals - including coyotes - co -exist peaceably in communities across the nation. The educated and informed bases of modern methods render the all -or- nothing eradication of an animal population inhumane, unnecessary and unwise. Please do not revert back to antiquated brutality. Leg -hold traps indiscriminately and torturously bind any animal - even domesticated animals - while the terrified animal attempts to chew or twist off its own limb in order to escape. Poisoning - also indiscriminate - invariably produces agonizingly slow death. Shooting within or near the city limits of any municipality is overwhelmingly rejected as unreasonably dangerous. Edina has a long history of leadership and - with attention to modern, humane solutions - will continue to lead. Thank you. Sadie Schrader Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 9:50 AM To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Use of coyote traps in Edina Hello there, RECEOVED JUN 0 9 2011 This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. ,. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunnoaci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: kate trump [mailtofrumpk70 @gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20118:35 PM To: James Hovland; Lynette Biunno Subject: Use of coyote traps in Edina Jim Hovland, Mayor of Edina; Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, and Ann Swenson - Edina City Council: Thank you for taking the time to read my letter. The news of your plan to set steel traps or shoot coyotes in Edina, has reached Iowa City, Iowa. While I understand the concern and need to protect the citizens and domestic pets of Edina, I sincerely hope you will consider using more humane means of capturing coyotes and other animals that yo want to assess for possible dangerous behavior. The steel traps, even when 'lined" are still extremely painful, cause trapped animals to fiercely fight for their lives (even previously non confrontational animals), and cause extensive physical damage. Even though you are having "professionals" manage this project, I wonder if these professionals can 100% guarantee they will prevent a child, adult, domestic cat, dog, etc from accidently or inadvertently getting caught in a trap. Dogs caught in these traps have been seriously maimed and died as a result of the injuries incurred. Trapping coyotes to save dogs? Please consider all aspects of this decision. Being a long time pet owner, I understand the concern of possible coyote attacks. I lived on a farm (sometimes with livestock) for several decades. We lived in harmony with coyotes, understanding we had moved into their territory, not they into ours. I respectfully request that you sincerely consider another means of tracking and determining which animal may be responsible for the attacks. It is not all of them. And searching for dens to possibly shoot adult coyotes may leave babies behind, adding additional cruelty to the process. Thank you. Kate Trump Iowa City, Iowa Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 9:54 AM To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long -R EC E U VE Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FK PLEASE...NO Steel Jaw Traps JUN 0 9 2011 Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno @ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Irving Smith [mailto:ioxsmith @comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20119:13 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: PLEASE ... NO Steel Jaw Traps Dear City Council of Edina, Please, No Steel Jaw Traps. Thank You, I Smith 1 Susan Howl From: Sent: Lynette Biunno Thursday, June 09, 2011 9:53 AM (� EC � p�{� Vv E D To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long UU Cc: Susan Howl ��� O Z01� Subject: FW: Coyotes Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 R)v IbiunnoAci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Rita [mailto:ritas @Hickorytech.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20119:06 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Coyotes Please decide on a better way to handle the problem with coyotes. Steel jaw traps is way too cruel. We are civilized. Pet and other animals could get trapped as well. There must be a better way. Thank you. Sincerely Rita Severns 2130 Arlington Ln. No Mankato, Mn. 56003 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 9:58 AM ro: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl E C E 0 V �p E DVP Subject: FW: steel jaw traps? - Google Search JUN 0 9 2011 Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno @ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Irving Smith [mailto:ioxsmith @comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20119:14 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: steel jaw traps? - Google Search Dear City Council, Take a look. http://www.poogle.com/ search ?g = steel +jaw+ traps %3F &hl =en& client = firefox -a &hs= It &sa= G &rls= org.mozilla:en- US:official &channel= s &biw= 1280& bih = 557 &prmd = ivns &tbm= isch &tbo =u& source = univ &ei= yirwTegeDbGrOAGN- M HyDA &ved= OCF8QsAQ 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno U X10 !� v Edo E O V E Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 10:29 AM To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Susan Howl JUN 0 9 2011 Cc: Subject: FVV: Trapping Coyotes saw Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 lbiunno(@ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Robert Johnson [mailto: nitro pony302 @yahoo.comj Sent: Thursday, June 09, 20117:35 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Trapping Coyotes I am totally AGAINST the city of Edina trapping coyotes with steel -jaw traps. Steel -jaw traps, even rubber - coated ones, cause immense pain and injury. Terrified, the trapped animals are further injured in their frantic struggle to get free. Bones snap, flesh tears, and many victims chew or twist off their own limbs in order to escape. Please reconsider and find a better solution! Bob Johnson i Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 10:07 AM o: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl R EC E ED Subject: FW: CHAI - Reality Check - Steel -jaw Traps JUN 0 9 2011 Hello there, -- - - " --- This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 Ibiunno @ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Irving Smith [mailto:ioxsmith @comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20119:16 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: CHAI - Reality Check - Steel -jaw Traps http: / /www.chai- online.org /en /compassion /reality /reality traps.htm Dear City Council: Now you can see why! i CHAI - Reality Check - Steel -jaw Traps Page 1 of 1 Home About Us News Campaigns Compassionate Living Humane Education Companion Animals For Kids Shop Contact Us Search Compassionate Living ► Reality Check ► Steel -jaw Traps �4q ]wn (41AI J YJr �cn.af,r. Copyright Privacy PoliCy http: / /www.chai- online. org /en/ compassion /reality /reality_traps.htm 6/9/2011 Steel -jaw Traps REALITY CHECK TOPICS Steel -jaw traps, both leghold and body - gripping, are produced in a wide variety of sizes, from 4 Reality Check inches (mink, muskrat) to 12 inches (bears). They are easily available to trappers, hunters, and Contents exterminators for profit, recreation, or "nuisance" wildlife control. Baited with canned fish (tuna and Steel -jaw Traps sardines) and animal parts, traps attract all species indiscriminately. These violent devices are most often set into a shallow hole with a chain connected to a swivel and then a 2 -foot rebar stake, everything disguised with sifted earth, grass, or leaves. Those caught might be killed outright, die RELATED TOPICS from exposure or dehydration or predation or bleeding, or suffer agonizing severe physical trauma, like a crushed limb. Some trappers will shoot their catch with a .22 caliber short barrel rifle in the Our Clothes head. Most animals are clubbed or stomped to death. Fur Trapping has been banned in Israel. �4q ]wn (41AI J YJr �cn.af,r. Copyright Privacy PoliCy http: / /www.chai- online. org /en/ compassion /reality /reality_traps.htm 6/9/2011 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 10:24 AM To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long (� Cc: Susan Howl R EC E O V �n E Subject: Fw JUN 0 9 2011 Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno @ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: w0000deeee @hotmail.com [mailto:w0000deeee @hotmail.com] On Behalf Of tlamb Sent: Thursday, June 09, 20116:28 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Please do not use steel- jaw traps in your trapping of coyotes. Please do it humanely. Timothy Lamb Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist �n \ 952- 927 -8861 1Fax 952 -826 -0389 Ibiunno(fti.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com For Living, Learning, Raising Families ti Doing Business From: Ann Gershone [mailto:anngershone @gmaii.com] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 20116:41 AM To: Lynette Biunho Subject: Traps Please consider a different way to trap coyotes other than steel traps. The animals always suffer and pets fall prey to them. Thank you Ann Gershone 1 , Susan Howl From: Sent: Lynette Biunno Thursday, June 09, 2011 10:26 AM (IED R E E V E To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Subject: Susan Howl FW: Traps JUN 0 9 2011 Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist �n \ 952- 927 -8861 1Fax 952 -826 -0389 Ibiunno(fti.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com For Living, Learning, Raising Families ti Doing Business From: Ann Gershone [mailto:anngershone @gmaii.com] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 20116:41 AM To: Lynette Biunho Subject: Traps Please consider a different way to trap coyotes other than steel traps. The animals always suffer and pets fall prey to them. Thank you Ann Gershone 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 10:18 AM FWRWV� fo: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Do not consider trapping coyotes w /steel traps I JUN 0.9. 2011 Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno@ci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Jink Jink [mailto:m21o9z @webtv.net] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 20111:15 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Do not consider trapping coyotes w /steel traps Dear Council Members, Imagine the agony of having one of your extremities caught in the steel jaws of a trap. Unspeakable! As an animal lover, member of a host of animal and environmental organizations and fellow Minnesotan, I am begging you to banish any thoughts of using this horrendously cruel method to trap coyotes. Companion animals can accidentally get out of the house or off their leashes and become victim to the horrors of the steel traps too. If coyotes need to be relocated, please use humane methods such as live traps. I hope that you are persuaded to rethink this proposed action. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely yours, Jo -Ann Sramek Duluth, MN 55811 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette in Sent: Thursday, Jun e 09, 2011 10:22 AM R EC E WE To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl JUN 0 9 2011 Subject: FW: re : Steel jaw traps Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist ((al 952-927-88611 Fax 952- 826 -0389 Ibiunno(a),c.i.edina.mn.us I www.Cit-ofEdina.com ...For Living. Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Dechru @aol.com [mailto:Dechru @aol.com] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 20115:55 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: re : Steel jaw traps Please do not allow steel jaw traps to be used to trap wolves D Rutland Susan Howl From: Lynette Thursday, June 09, 2011 10:15 AM Jun Sent: y, To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long [RIECEOVED Cc: Susan Howl JUN 0 9 2011 L Subject: FW: Please do Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 IbiunnoCcDci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com For Living, I earnin -, Raisin- Families & Doing Business From: Sarah Woodcock [mailto:sarahkwoodcock @gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20119:54 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Please do Dear Edina City Council (Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, and Ann Swenson), I am writing to you as someone who grew up going to church in Edina, now works in Edina, and now frequently shops in Edina. I recently learned that the city of Edina is considering using steel jaw traps to catch and kill coyotes. I urge you to stand up against this possibility as steel jaw traps are cruel and inhumane. I urge you to find a less cruel and more humane way to deal with coyotes through research and understanding. Please do not use steel -jaw traps. Thank you for your consideration. Thank you, Sarah Woodcock sarahKwoodcock(aDgmail.com Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 10:16 AM �� ��� To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: trapping JUN 0 9 2011 Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno @ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitVofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Kathy B [mailto:kbl @mywdo.comj Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20119:58 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: trapping Please vote no to trapping coyotes with steel jaw traps. These traps are not only cruel but any animal, including our pets (dogs & cats) can end up in them. These traps are very cruel and I urge you to vote no on using them to trap the coyotes. Thank You, Kathy Bennett 1 Susan Howl Pff C�CEOMED From: schottskil @gmail.com [mailto:schottskii @gmail.com] On Behalf Of Renee Schott Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 11:35 AM To: James Hovland; Lynette Biunno Subject: Re: leg hold traps are in inhumane JUN 0 9 2011 Sorry to email again, but I found one more article that you might find interesting (although you have probably already reviewed it!) htt : / /di italcommons.unl.edu/c i /viewcontent.c i ?article= 1515 &context =icwdm usdanwrc&sei- redir =I #search = "large +huinane +cage +trap +coyote" Thank you On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Renee Schott <rgschottna gmail.com> wrote: Hi there, My name is Renee Schott and I am a wildlife veterinarian at the Wildlife Rehabilitation Center of Roseville. I am not sure if it is true, but I had heard the city of Edina was considering using leg hold traps to control coyote populations. In my professional opinion, leg hold traps are inhumane. Although the American Veterinary Medical Association favors modern leg hold traps over antiquated ones (http://www.avma.org/press/releases/080520 trapping.asp) there are many risks to using modern leg hold traps - if the spring is not at the appropriate strength or the haws aren't set to the appropriate distance, it can cause as much damage (fractures, skin wounds, pressure sores, amputations) as old ones; if the trap is not the appropriate size, non target species may be captured. Additionally, if modern leg hold traps are to be used, the AVMA supports the use of modern leghold traps only if used in conjunction with trap monitors and tranquilizers, both of which are very expensive and require many people to monitor effectively. Large, humane cage traps (which much be checked at least every 24 hours) are a simpler and more humane option for trapping coyotes. This email does not imply whether or not I support trapping and relocation of coyotes or not; it is simply stating my professional opinion on leg hold traps. Finally, my opinion is not necessarily the opinion of the Wildlife Rehabilitation Center of Roseville (it is my own personal opinion). Thank you for your time. Sincerely, G�EC7OVE JUN. Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for USDA National Wildlife Research Center - Staff Publications University of Nebraska - Lincoln Year 2005 Initial comparison: jaws, cables, and cage -traps to capture coyotes John A. Shivik Daniel J. Martin Michael J. Pipas John Turnan Thomas J. DeLiberto This paper is posted at Digital Commons @University of Nebraska - Lincoln. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm-usdanwrc/519 Predator and Prey Research JAWS, CABLES, AND CAGE -TRAPS 1375 Initial comparison: jaws, cables, and cage -traps to capture coyotes John A. Shivik, Daniel J Martin, Michael J Pipas, John nrnan, and Thomas J DeLiberto AbstraCt The need for alternative predator capture techniques is increasing because of concerns about the efficiency, selectivity, and injury of currently available capture methods. There also is a need for comparative data evaluating new or seldom used methods. In an ini- tial evaluation, we first surveyed wildlife managers for information on cage- trapping; using these data, we conducted a field study of 4 coyote (Canis latrans) capture systems for animal damage management. We tested the SoftCatch®, CollarumO, Wildlife Services - Turman, and Tomahawk ®, systems for capturing coyotes in Arizona and south Texas during 2001 and 2002. We determined capture efficiency and selectivity and per- formed whole -body necropsies to identify trap - related injuries. Surveys indicated that coyotes usually were captured in large ( >1.6 -m- length) cage -traps baited with meat or carcasses. In our field evaluation, we estimated a capture efficiency (percentage of coy- ote captures per capture opportunity) of 0% for the Tomahawk cage -trap, 87% for the Col larum, 88% for the WS -T throw arm, and 100% for the SoftCatch. Cage -traps were the least selective, capturing 34 noncoyote animals, and Collarums were the most selec- tive, capturing no noncoyote animals. The WS -T and SoftCatch devices showed inter- mediate selectivity of 50% and 69 %, respectively. All devices showed low injury scores relative to jawed devices in previous studies; 92 %, 57 %, and 92% of coyotes captured in the Collarum, WS -T, and SoftCatch showed no indicators of poor welfare, respectively. Key words cage -trap, Canis latrans, coyote, efficiency, injury, selectivity, snare, trap Foothold traps commonly are used to capture coyotes (Cants latrans) for fur, for biological research, and for depredation and population man- agement. In recent years the perception that these devices may inflict serious injury to trapped ani- mals has led to restrictions on use of jawed foothold traps in some areas of the United States (Cockrell 1999). Capture devices also are of inter- national concern, as indicated by agreements among Canada, the European Community, the Russian Federation, and the United States (United States of America- European Community 1997) related to commercial fur trade. Such concerns highlight the need to monitor newly developed capture systems relative to accepted animal injury standards. Continuing interest in capture- system technolo- gy (Andelt et al. 1999) has promoted recent testing of traditional (Onderka et al. 1990, Skinner and Todd 1990, Phillips et al. 1992), padded (Linhart and Dasch 1992, Phillips et al. 1996, Phillips and Mullis 1996), and otherwise modified traps (Houben et al. Address for John A. Shivik: USDA, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, and Utah State University, 163 BNR Build- ing, Logan, UT 84322 -5295, USA; e -mail: john.shivik @aphis.usda.gov. Address for Daniel J. Martin and Thomas J. DeLiberto: USDA, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research Center, 4101 LaPorte Ave., Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA. Address for Michael J. Pipas: USDA, Wildlife Services, 6731 West Coal Road, P.O. Box 59, Casper, WY 82602, USA. Address for John Turman: USDA, Wildlife Services, South District # 5, 9380 Bond Avenue, Suite A, El Cajon, CA 92021, USA. Wildlife Society Bulletin 2005, 33(4):1375 -1383 Peer refereed 1376 Wildlife Society Bulletin 2005,33(4):1375-1383 1993, Gruver et al. 1996, Hubert et al. 1997) and snares (Phillips 1996, Shivik et al. 2000). Box -type traps generally are thought of as being undesirable for capturing coyotes (Way et al. 2002), and the method was not explored in common wildlife -dam- age- management methods texts (Hygnstrom et al. 1994); furthermore, Way et al. (2002:700) conclud- ed that "future studies should conduct a compari- son of injuries sustained to coyotes captured in foothold and box -traps and snare devices" as Mowat et al. (1994) did for lynx (Lynx lynx). Box - traps, cable restraints, and other new and alternative devices have been considered (Garrett 1998, 1999) and sometimes are demanded by animal care and use committees. Therefore, thorough evaluations of capture devices are required. The objective of our research was to evaluate 4 coyote capture systems (cage -trap, powered neck - snare, powered foot - snare, and padded -jaw trap) for efficiency, selectivi- ty, and injury. Methods Cage -trap survey One objective of our research was to evaluate use of cage -traps for capturing coyotes. However, we had no previous experience using cage -traps for coyotes and could not readily find a thorough description of the proper use of cage -traps for coy- otes in an animal damage - management scenario, but we wanted to provide a thorough and unbiased evaluation of cage - traps. Therefore, we searched the literature and the Internet, and interviewed trappers who had captured coyotes in cage -traps to identify setting techniques that would maximize trapping success. We then used the information and opinions gathered from our survey to deter- mine how to set cage -traps such that they would have the highest probability of capturing coyotes. Field testing We tested 4 types of capture devices on coyotes in field situations during 2 studies; the first study, conducted from 11 November to 5 December, 2001, was in Mohave County, Arizona, and the sec- ond study, conducted from 10 March to 7 April 2002, was in Webb County,Texas. Cage -traps were: Tomahawk® model 110C (183 x 50 x 66cm, Tomahawk Live Trap Co., Tomahawk, Wisc.). The Collarum® restraint (Green Mountain Inc., Lander, Wyo.) used a baited pull-tab that triggered a pair of coil- spring- powered throw -arms that propelled a Figure 1. Collarum® Neck Restraint produced by Green Mountain, Inc., Lander, Wyo. (now produced by Wildlife Control Supplies, Simsbury, CT). 0.476 -mm (3/16 " - diameter) cable loop over the head and onto the neck of a coyote. A stop on the cable prevented coyotes from being choked. The version of the Collarum we tested in this study dif- fered from ones previously evaluated ( Shivik et al. 2000) in that it had improved cable clips and an additional horizontal spring that tightened the snare loop as the throw -arm mechanism activated (Figure 1). The Wildlife Services' Turman snare (WS -T, Figure 2) was a throw -arm snare produced by Wildlife Services employees in California (John W. Turman, El Cajon, Calif.). It used a 0.125 -mm (1/8 "- diameter) cable and cam -lock with a 250 -1b break -away sheer pin. The WS -T device was a new Figure 2. The WS —T powered -snare device. Jaws, cables, and cage -traps • Shivik et al. 1377 design using smaller components and flat and angu- lar iron and not the same device produced by Wildlife Services employees in Idaho and tested previously by Shivik et al. (2000). Lastly, the Soft Catch© trap (bloodstream Corp., Lititz, Penn.) was used as a reference device to provide initial com- parisons of efficiency, selectivity, and injury for the devices. In this paper we use the commercial names of products for identification only and not as an endofsement of products by the authors or the United States Department of Agriculture. We established traplines along unimproved ranch roads and checked traps each morning, which limited the amount of time an animal could be held in a trap to 24 hours. We chose trap sites based on coyote sign and habitat features but ran- domly selected restraining devices for placement after choosing the trap site. We seated cage -traps into the ground to cover the mesh floor with sub- strate and baited them with wool and a commercial call lure or lamb (Ovis aries), jackrabbit (Lepus cal - ifornicus), or deer (Odocoileus hemionus) meat wired to the rear of the trap. To measure efficiency of each device, we divided number of coyote captures /device by number of potential captures; a potential capture occurred when a coyote triggered the trap and was caught but then escaped or was caught and held (Phillips et al. 1992). Trappers examined tracks and sign at the capture site to identify potential captures. Furthermore, we calculated the capture rate as the number of captures per 1,000 trap- nights. We defined selectivity as number of coyotes captured relative to total number of animals captured and calculated the ratio of noncoyote to coyotes cap- tured. For analysis of injury, we performed whole -body necropsies (Hubert et al. 1997) in accordance with accepted international standards and procedures (United States of America- European Community 1997, International Organization for Standardiza- tion 1999)• However, our study was designed as an initial comparison of capture systems for coyote damage management, and we did not attempt to certify traps relative to the standards. For compari- son purposes we regarded the following categories as "indicators of poor animal welfare" (United States of America- European Community 1997): fracture, joint luxation proximal to the carpus or tarsus, sev- erance of a tendon or ligament, major periosteal abrasion, severe external hemorrhage or hemor- rhage into an internal cavity, major skeletal muscle degeneration, limb ischemia, fracture of a perma- nent tooth exposing pulp cavity, ocular damage including corneal laceration, spinal cord injury, severe internal organ damage, myocardial degener- ation, amputation, or death.The quality of injury was assessed by our veterinarian (TJD), who con- sidered terms such as "major," for example, to mean "deep and more than superficial," and "severe" to be "extensive and detectable grossly." According to the guidelines for humane trapping (United States of America- European Community 1997), a device is considered to exceed the standard if >80% of a sample of 20 captured animals show none of these indicators. Because of the ubiquitous use of injury scores in the literature, we also scored injuries according to Onderka et al. (1990), Phillips et al. (1996), and Hubert et al. (1997) to allow some com- parison of the devices we tested to values from pre- vious studies. This study focused on differences among capture devices and not on differences across time, loca- tion, or trapper; thus, randomization of device selec- tion occurred at the site level, which was the basic unit of analysis, and we pooled trappers and areas for analysis. We limit our inferences to the use of these devices in Mohave County, Arizona, and Webb County,Texas. Similarly, in analysis of injury, tempo- ral and area effects were not of interest in this study, but injury to animals by capture device were; thus, the captured coyote was the sample unit for injury analysis. Trappers anesthetized captured coyotes with 2 cc of a 10:1 ketamine:ace promazine solution, then euthanized them with 6 cc intracardial injection of Beuthanasia® -D solution (Schering- Plough Animal Health Corp., Union, N.J.) and immediately froze the carcasses. We shipped carcasses collected dur- ing this study to the United States Department of Agriculture, Wildlife Services National Wildlife Research Center, where a veterinarian (TJD) per- formed whole -body necropsies. Results Cage -trap survey We located 19 publications that mentioned coy- ote cage - trapping, of which 9 briefly stated that cage -traps could not effectively be used to capture coyotes. We contacted 26 people by phone or e- mail who personally had captured or knew of someone who had captured at least 1 coyote in a cage -trap. Respondents reported capturing 1 -545 1378 Wildloe Society Bulletin 2005, 33(4):1375 -1383 Table 1. Information obtained from 2000 and 2001 telephone interviews of trappers that had the autumn of 2001 and captured coyotes in cage- traps. spring of 2002. During 492 trap- nights we cap - Trap Coyotes Captures/1,000 tured no coyotes in cage - Target species dimensions captured Trap nights trap nights traps and had no coyotes Bobcata 107 x 38 x 51 24 5,300 4.5 activate the trap mecha- Coyoteb 152 -183 x 51 x 66 29 1,447 20 nism (zero efficiency). San Joaquin kit foxc 107 x 38 x 38 3 40,032 0.1 During 483 trap- nights we Swift foxd 92 x 25 x 31 2 1,069 1.9 captured 13 coyotes (27 Ocelote 107 x 41 x 51 7 4,701 1.5 per 1,000 trap-nights) P a Personal communication, T. Blankenship, Welder Wildlife Foundation, Texas. coyotes in the Collarum b Way (2000). restraint, with 15 poten- c Personal communication, B. L. Cypher. California State University, Stanislaus, California. tial captures (efficiency= d Personal communication, J. F. Kamler, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas. 0.87, SE= 0.09 ). During e Laack (1991) 507 trap - nights we cap- coyotes in cage -traps in urban or suburban envi- ronments. In rural areas coyotes were captured as nontargets in traps set for feral hogs (Sus scrofa), ocelots (Leopardus pardalis), bobcats (Lynx rufus), or foxes (Vulpes spp.,Table 1). All of the trappers suggested use of baits and not species - specific coyote lures (such as scat and urine). Baits used included live domestic chicken, domestic chicken parts, live rock dove (Columba Livia), rock dove, deer (Odocoileus spp.), rabbit (Sylvilagus spp.), ground- squirrel (Sper7nopbilus spp.), pheasant (Phasianus colcbicus), meat scraps, pet food, and canned fish. Also, when respondents set traps in a travel corridor, no bait was used. Of the 17 trappers who had captured coyotes in cage - traps, 3 used small traps (81 -91 x 25 x 31 cm), 5 used medium -sized traps (107 -152 x 30 -51 x 30 -66 cm), 7 used large traps (183 x 51 -91 x 61 -79 cm), and 2 used very large traps (244 -305 x 122 -305 x 91 -122 cm). Of the coyotes for which data were available for age, 53 adults and 43 juve- niles were captured. Based on findings of our survey, we devised guidelines for setting cage -traps for coyotes. That is, we used traps greater than 1.6 m in length, covered the trap floor with natural substrate, and baited with carcass parts attached to the inside of the trap. Although conditioning coyotes with pre - baiting also was suggested as a useful method, logistical and practical considerations prevented us from pre - baiting traps before initiating the study. Efficiency We set 46 SoftCatch traps, 45 WS -T, 43 Collarum, and 41 cage -traps in Arizona and south Texas during tured 7 coyotes (14/1,000 trap- nights) of the 8 that activated the WS -T snare (efficiency= 0.88, SE= 0.13). We captured all of the 25 coyotes that acti- vated the SoftCatch traps (efficiency= 100%) during 517 trap- nights (48 coyotes per 1,000 trap - nights). Selectivity The 34 noncoyote animals captured in cage -traps were 7 bobcats, 12 raccoons (Procyon ltor), 2 armadillos (Dasypus novemcinctus), 2 badgers (Taxidea taxus), 2 javelina (Pecari tajacu, both in the same trap), 1 rattlesnake (Crotalus sp.), 1 road- runner (Geococcyx californianus), 1 caracara (Polyborus plancus), 1 turkey vulture (Catbartes aura), 2 curve -billed thrashers (Toxostoma curvi- rostre, both in the same trap), and 3 domestic dogs. However, we captured no coyotes in cage -traps (selectivity= 0). We captured no animals other than coyotes with Collanuns (selectivity = 1.0). The WS -T snares captured 7 noncoyote animals (1 bob- cat, 2 raccoons, 3 domestic dogs, and 1 feral hog) out of 14 total (selectivity= 0.50, SE = 0.14). In SoftCatch traps, 11 of the 36 animals captured were not coyotes (4 bobcats, 1 badger, 3 dogs, 3 rac- coons, selectivity = 0. 69, SE= 0.08). Injury For each coyote captured, we collected informa- tion from a detailed list of injuries, then used these summary data to rank degree of injury according to previously reported interpretive scales (Table 2). Lack of captures precluded injury evaluation for cage traps, but the necropsies of animals captured in other devices provided useful information on injury rates. Most coyotes captured in the Collarum received no or only minor injuries to teeth; howev- jaws, cables, and cage -traps • Shivik et al. 1379 Table 2. Injury data from whole -body necropsies of coyotes captured with restraining devices during studies in Mohave County Arizona, and Webb County, Texas from November 2001 —April 2002. Soft Catch® WS —T Collarum n =24 n =7 n =13 No. % No. % No. % No injury 1 4 1 14 4 31 Claw loss 2 8 1 14 0 0 Edematous swelling or hemorrhage 20 83 4 57 0 0 Cutaneous laceration 10 42 2 29 0 0 Laceration on foot pads or tongue 1 4 0 0 0 0 Minor (below carpus— tarsus) subcutaneous soft - tissue maceration erosion 11 46 1 14 0 0 Major (above carpus— tarsus) subcutaneous soft - tissue maceration erosion 0 0 1 14 0 0 Minor (superficial) periosteal abrasion 1 4 0 0 0 0 Major (including bone erosion, deep) periosteal abrasion 0 0 0 0 0 0 Severance of minor (below carpus— tarsus) tendon or ligament 0 0 0 0 0 0 Severance of major (at or above carpus — tarsus) tendon or ligament 0 0 1 14 0 0 Amputation of 1 digit 0 0 1 14 0 0 Amputation of 2 digits 0 0 0 0 0 0 Amputation of 3 or more digits 0 0 0 0 0 0 Any amputation above the digits 0 0 0 0 0 0 Self- mutilation 0 0 0 0 0 0 Severe joint hemorrhage 1 4 0 0 0 0 joint luxation at or below the carpus or tarsus 1 4 0 0 0 0 Gross skeletal muscle degeneration (detectable grossly) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Simple fracture at or below the carpus or tarsus 0 0 0 0 0 0 Any fracture or joint luxation on limb above the carpus or tarsus 0 0 1 14 0 0 Compound or comminuted fracture at or below the carpus or tarsus 0 0 0 0 0 0 Compression fracture 0 0 0 0 0 0 Limb ischemia 0 1 14 0 0 0 Severe internal organ damage (internal bleeding) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Myocardial degeneration (detectable grossly) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Vertebral injury — spinal cord injury 0 0 0 0 0 0 Simple rib fracture 0 0 0 0 0 0 Comminuted rib fracture 0 0 0 0 0 0 Compound rib fracture 0 0 0 0 0 0 Permanent tooth fracture exposing pulp cavity- recent (sharp edges, no discoloration) 2 8 0 0 0 0 Chipped tooth, not exposing pulp cavity 2 8 2 29 , 7 54 Deciduous tooth fracture exposing pulp cavity 0 0 0 0 0 0 Tooth fracture exposing pulp cavity (old, worn edge discoloration) 1 4 0 0 0 0 Eye lacerations 0 0 0 0 1 8 Ocular injury resulting in blindness 0 0 0 0 0 0 Skeletal degeneration 0 0 0 0 0 0 Any other fractures (e.g. mandible) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Edema, swelling or hemorrhage on head or neck 0 0 0 0 0 0 Skin Abrasion, head or neck 0 0 0 0 2 15 Death (recorded by field observers only) 0 0 1 14 1 8 er, 1 animal was killed because the snare cinched over both the head and neck, causing the snare to choke the coyote before the stop was engaged. Twelve of 13 (rate = 0.92, SE = 0.08) coyotes cap- tured in the Collarum showed no indicators of poor welfare. Most injuries caused by the WS -T device were minor, but there was a broader array of injuries than with the Collarum (Table 2). There was 1 mortality in the WS -T, but we could not determine its cause because the captured coyote showed no injuries except moderate edematous swelling and hemorrhage. Four of the 7 (rate= 0.57, 1380 Wildlife Societe Bulletin 2005,33(4):1375-1383 SE =0.20) coyotes captured showed no indicators of poor welfare in the WS -T device. Most injuries caused by the SoftCatch also were minor (Table 2), and 22 of 24 (rate = 0.92, SE = 0.06) coyotes cap- tured showed no indicators of poor welfare. Using the system set forth by Onderka et al. (1990), the mean injury scores from the devices we tested were 0.8, 41.7, and 19.8 for the Collarum, WS -T, and SoftCatch devices, respectively. The Hubert et al. (1997) method estimated mean injury scores for the devices we tested as 0.75, 42.4, and 23.3 for the Collarum,WS -T, and SoftCatch devices, respectively. Using the system set forth by Phillips et al. (1996), the mean injury scores from the devices we tested were 2.5, 30.7, and 21.7 for the Collarum, WS -T, and SoftCatch devices, respective- ly. Discussion Cage -trap survey Way et al. (2002) presented the most compre- hensive study on the use of cage -traps for coyotes that we could find in the literature; however, anec- dotes from other trappers provided a useful basis for our investigation into the use of cage - traps. For example, several trappers suggested that only sick, old, or inexperienced juvenile coyotes could be captured in cage - traps. However, age - structure data from the trappers suggested no such bias because 55% of captured coyotes were adults, similar to Way et al. (2002), who captured (and recaptured) a majority of healthy adult coyotes. One explanation is that older coyotes in suburban areas are more habituated to crawling though human- constructed obstacles and thus are more vulnerable to cage - traps. In the case of the 1 trapper who reported capturing 545 coyotes in cage - traps, for instance, the traps were set in suburban areas of Los Angeles over the course of the individual's career and tar- geted habituated coyotes that were not wary of human constructions. We concluded from our sur- vey that, except in suburban nuisance trapping, most captures of coyotes in cage -traps were rare and that it is exceedingly difficult to capture coy- otes in cage -traps in agricultural areas in animal damage management circumstances. Efficiency Other authors reported high efficiencies for other trap models, with capture efficiencies of 95 %, 95 %, 89 %, and 100 %, using the Victor No. 3 NM, Victor No. 3 Soft Catch, Newhouse No. 4, and the Sterling MJ 600, respectively (Phillips and Mullis 1996). More recently developed devices appeared to be less efficient (78% for the Belisle, 8.3% for the Panda, 41% for the Collarum, and 66% for the Wildlife Services system; Shivik et al. 2000). However, the devices evaluated in this study (with the exception of the cage -trap) show that new, innovative designs can be more efficient for cap- turing coyotes. We were not able to capture coyotes with cage - traps; thus, our estimate of the efficiency of cage - traps was zero. Other trappers using cage -traps for bobcats in Texas reported 4.5 coyotes captured per 1,000 trap - nights (Table 1). Clearly, capture effi- ciencies are far lower with cage -traps than with other devices. We believe there were 2 primary rea- sons we were not able to capture coyotes in cage - traps. First, although we incorporated the tech- niques of past trappers, we were not able to pre - bait for 2 -3 months and condition coyotes to the traps, which was an important component for cage - trapping coyotes as described by Way et al. (2002). Second, our studies were of relatively short dura- tion, and although it is clearly possible to capture coyotes in cage - traps, it takes longer to do so. For now, especially in rural areas, cage -traps are not like- ly to be feasible tools for capturing coyotes; new cage -trap designs should be explored that incorpo- rate understanding of coyote behavior and wari- ness. Capture efficiencies using previous versions of the Collarum were relatively low (41 %, Shivik et al. 2000), but the modified device we tested included a secondary throw -arm, which greatly improved efficiency. The Collarum may be more difficult to set appropriately compared to jawed traps, and ani- mals have the additional behavioral requirement of pulling a tab rather than stepping on a disguised pan, which also may limit the capture rates of the Collarum (27 coyotes /1,000 trap - nights vs. 48 coy- otes /1,000 trap- nights for the SoftCatch; x2= 2.71,P =0.10) relative to hidden, behaviorally passive cap- ture devices. The WS -T device also was efficient, with 88% of potential captures resulting in actual captures, an efficiency approaching that of a jawed trap, and improved efficiency relative to previous designs (Shivik et al. 2000). However, the capture rate (14 coyotes /1,000 trap - nights) of the WS -T was low rel- ative to the other devices tested, and we believe this was due to our setting technique. We used a 5 jaws, cables, and cage -traps • Shivik et al. 1381 cm x 8 cm x 2 cm foam block beneath the pan to establish pan tension, which probably excluded some captures by not having the sensitivity and adjustability of other pan- tension systems (Phillips and Gruver 1996). This device requires further test- ing. SoftCatch traps performed well in this study, with efficiency similar to that previously reported (Phillips and Mullis 1996). They may outperform the other devices tested due to their relative sim- plicity, plus the advantage of being a design more common and familiar to most trappers. Selectivity Cage -traps performed poorly in regard to selec- tivity in this and prior studies (Way et al. 2002). It is clear that modifications to preclude nontarget captures are necessary before cage -traps can be rec- ommended for coyotes under most animal damage management situations. Finding coyote - specific attractants rather than using broadly attractive car- rion baits may be essential for improving the selec- tivity of cage - traps. As in previous research (Shivik et al. 2000), the Collarum was particularly selective for coyotes (100 %). The baited top and capture mechanism is relatively species - specific, and the mechanics of the device make capture of other species unlikely. The WS -T device was intermediately selective, and we believe that a modified pan- tension design may improve the selectivity of the device. The SoftCatch trap also showed intermediate selectivity for coy- otes. Modifications that could increase selectivity also may act to decrease efficiency; therefore, inno- vative approaches are required to optimize both aspects of capture devices. Injury Sample sizes were low for injury analyses on all but SoftCatch traps, and we encourage other authors to more thoroughly examine the snare -type designs that we examined. Furthermore, because our research was focused on coyotes, we did not do necropsies and collect information on noncoyote animals captured. We believe that future studies should collect information on all animals, not just animals targeted for capture, that are restrained. It is difficult to use injury scores to compare dif- ferences in injury between these devices and oth- ers because injury scales have only recently been standardized using whole -body necropsies (International Organization for Standardization 1999), and scores are inappropriate for statistical comparison (Engeman et al. 1997). However, the newer capture devices and methods appear to reduce injuries relative to previous devices. Onderka et al. (1990) reported damage scores of 64.9, 21.6, 5.9, and 59.4 for unpadded jaw, padded jaw, Fremont snare, and Novak snare, respectively; Phillips et al. (1996) reported mean trauma scores of 103.3 for an unpadded trap and 29.0 and 79.3 for 2 padded traps; Hubert et al. (1997) found a stan dard coil spring to register a mean injury score of 97 and the same trap modified with offset jaws and lamination to be 80. It is interesting to note that in this study the SoftCatch and the Collarum both sur- passed the established injury acceptability thresh- old (United States of America - European Community 1997); for each device, greater than 80% of coyotes captured had no indicators of poor welfare. Further replication is required, but our results are promising and suggest that capture -sys- tem technologies and methods are improving in terms of minimizing injury to captured coyotes. Because cable restraints in their current form do not wholly prevent injury, further research and development are still required, especially because the number of coyotes necropsied was low for the Collarum and WS. -T devices. We examined other aspects of using capture devices, such as selectivity and efficiency, not just injury, and the data support- ed the conclusion of Way et al. (2002) that box -traps are not desirable for use on coyotes, especially for animal damage management. These data and our previous work (Shivik et al. 2000) suggested that the Collarum was appropriate for use in animal damage management; it had acceptable efficiency and injury scores. However, 1 coyote was killed when the snare loop failed to set properly. Future modifications to cable restraint systems could limit injuries to teeth; a coated cable, a displacement behavior "pacifier," or a Trap Tranquilizer Device (Sahr and Knowlton 2000) attached to the lock end of a cable may prevent tooth injuries (Shivik et al. 2000, Pruss et al. 2002). Management implications Inferences from our data should be limited to areas of the southwestern United States with rela- tively warm temperatures and sandy soil. Setting these devices in wet, freezing, or dense and resist- ant soils, for instance, may require adding more powerful springs or stiffer cables or using dry, 1382 Wildlife Societe Bulletin 2005,33(4):137571383 sandy bedding to achieve similar capture efficien- cies. We examined capture devices relative to use in agricultural coyote damage management situations, and although the cage -trap performed poorly, there may be other situations, such as with urban or habituated coyotes, in which cage -traps may be use- ful. Similarly, the directionality of Collarum devices may preclude their use in some situations, or at the minimum cause trappers to rethink their method of "funneling" coyotes toward a capture device. The novelty of recent designs, including the WS -T device, will require additional training and effort to maximize efficiency and selectivity while minimiz- ing injury. It is interesting to note that our studies of cap- ture devices showed improvement in efficiency, selectivity, and injury measurements when using newly developed devices. Private individuals and employees of United States Department of Agriculture's Wildlife Services are expending efforts to develop a wider variety of tools that will assist wildlife managers in the future. Although cage - traps and cable restraint systems may hold some promise for increasing selectivity and reducing injury, current evaluations suggest that capture devices should be chosen for the particular coyote capture management situation. That is, there is not a "best" capture device to recommend for use in all coyote- capture situations, and each system should be evaluated and applied based on its specifications and merits. Acknowledgments. We appreciated the assis- tance of the Wildlife Services' Arizona and California state programs. The Havasu National Wildlife Refuge generously provided housing. K. S. Gruver's efforts in the field were greatly appreciat- ed, and we thank the Wildlife Services program in Washington for lending him to us. All work was performed following approval by the National Wildlife Research Center's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, under study protocol QA- 962. Special thanks goes to C. Martens, ranch man- ager at the Killam Ranch. Literature cited ANDELT, W F, R. L. PHILLIPS, R. H. SCHMIDT, AND R. B. GILL. 1999. Trapping furbearers: an overview of the biological and social issues surrounding a public polity controversy. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27:53 -64. COCKRELL, S. 1999. Crusader activists and the 1996 Colorado anti - trapping campaign. Wildlife Society Bulletin 27:65 -74. ENGEMAN, R. M., H. W KRUPA, AND J. KERN. 1997. On the use of injury scores for judging the acceptability of restraining traps. Journal of Wildlife Research 2:124 -127. GARRm,T. 1998. The role of cage and box traps in modern trap- ping. Animal Welfare Institute, Washington, D.C., USA GARRiTTr, T. 1999. Alternative traps. Revised edition. Animal Welfare Institute,Washington, D.C., USA. GRUVER, K. S., R. L PHILuPS,ANID E. S.Wn.uAMs. 1996. Leg injuries to coyotes captured in standard and modified Soft CatchO traps. Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference 17:91 -93. HOUBEN, J. M., M. HOLLAND, S. W JACK, AND C. R. Bon.E. 1993. An evaluation of laminated offset jawed traps for reducing injuries to coyotes. Proceedings of the Great Plains Wildlife Damage Control Workshop 11:148 -153. HUBERT, G. F.,JR., L L. HUNGERFORD,AND R. D. BLUerc 1997. Injuries to coyotes captured in modified foothold traps. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25:858 -863. HYGNSTROM, S. E., R. M.TIMM,AND G. E. LARSON. 1994. Prevention and control of wildlife damage. University of Nebraska Cooperative Extension, United States Department of Agriculture, Great Plains Agricultural Council, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, USA INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION. 1999. Animal (mammal) traps, Part 5: methods for testing restraining traps. International Standard ISO/DIS 10990 -5. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland. LAACK, L. 1991. Ecology of the ocelot (Felis pardalis) in South Texas. Thesis,Texas A&M University, Kingsville, USA. UNHART, S. B., AND G. J. DASCH. 1992. Improved performance of padded jaw traps for capturing coyotes. Wildlife Society Bulletin 20:63 -66. MOWAT, G., G. G. SLOUGH, AND R. RNARD. 1994. A comparison of three live capturing devices for lynx: capture efficiency and injuries. Wildlife Society Bulletin 22:644 -650. ONDERKA, D. K., D. L. SKINNER, AND A.W.TODD. 1990. Injuries to coy- otes and other species caused by four models of fobtholding devices. Wildlife Society Bulletin 18:175 -182. PHILLIPS, R. L. 1996. Evaluation of three types of snares for cap- turing coyotes. Wildlife Society Bulletin 24:107 -110. PHILLIPS, R. L., F. S. BLOM, G.J. DASCH, AND J.W. GuTHR1E. 1992. Field evaluation of three types of coyote traps. Proceedings of the Vertebrate Pest Conference 15:393-395. PHILLIPS, R. L., AND K. S. GRUVER. 1996. Performance of the Paws - I -Trip pan tension device on 3 types of traps. Wildlife Society Bulletin 24:119 -122. PHILLIPS, R. L., K. S. GRUVER, AND E. S. WILLIAMS. 1996. Leg injuries to coyotes captured in three types of foothold traps. Wildlife Society Bulletin 24:260-263. PHILLIPS, R. L., AND C. L. MULLIS. 1996. Expanded field testing of the No. 3 Victor Soft Catch Trap. Wildlife Society Bulletin 24: 128 -131. PRUSS, S. D., N. L. COOL, R. J. HUDSON, AND A. R. GABOURY. 2002. Evaluation of a modified neck snare to live-capture coyotes. Wildlife Society Bulletin 30:508-516. SAHR, D. P., AND F. F. KNOWLTON. 2000. Evaluation of tranquilizer trap devices (TTDs) for foothold traps used to capture gray wolves. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28:597 -605. SHrvIK, J.A., K. S. GRIIVER,T. J. DELIBERTo. 2000. Preliminary evalu- ation of new cable restraints to capture coyotes. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28:606 -613. SKINNER, D. L, AND A. W. TODD. 1990. Evaluating efficiency of footholding devices for coyote capture. Wildlife Society Bulletin 18:166 -175. Jaws, cables, and cage -traps • Shivik et al UNITED STATES OF AMERICA- EtIROPEAN COMMUNITY. 1997. Agreed minute and annex: standards for the humane trapping of specified terrestrial and semi- aquatic mammals. Brussels, Belgium. WAY, J. G. 2000. Ecology of Cape Cod coyotes (Canis latrans var.). Thesis, University of Connecticut, Storrs, USA. WAY, J. G., 1. M. ORTEGA, P. J. AUGER, AND E. G. STRAUss. 2002. Box - trapping coyotes in southeastern Massachusetts. Wildlife Society Bulletin 30:695 -702. 1383 John A. Shivik (above, left) is the leader of the USDA, Wildlife Services (WS), National Wildlife Research Center (NWRC) Logan, Utah, Field Station. He received his B.S. from Frostburg State University (1990), M.S. from the University of California at Berkeley (1995), and Ph.D. from Colorado State University (1999). His current research goals in- volve incorporating studies of animal behavior and new technology into the development of new capture de- vices and effective nonlethal tech- niques for manag- ing large predators. Daniel J. (Danny) Martin (right) is cur- rently employed by the Colorado Divi- sion of Wildlife to 4 study swift fox populations in Colorado. He received his B.S. from Kansas State University (2000) and is currently completing his M.S. from Minnesota State University, Mankato. His re- search interests include animal movement, wildlife surveys, biodiversity, and wildlife damage management. Michael J. Pipas (left -hand photo, right) received his B.S. degree in biolo- gy from Indiana University of Pennsylvania (1988) and an M.S. in wildlife biology from Washington State University (1992). His career has been with WS, first as a research technician at the National Wildlife Research Center's Pullman, Washington Field Station (1992- 1997), then at the Fort Collins headquarters (1997- 2003), and since November of 2003 he has worked as a wildlife disease biologist for the WS operational program in Wyoming. John W. Turman is a district supervisor for the WS operational program in California; he has developed new snare and pan- tension testing devices for the program. Thomas J. (Tom) DeLiberto (above) has a B.S. (1985) from Colorado State University and an M.S. (1987) from Texas Tech University in wildlife biology. He received a Ph.D. (1993) in rangeland re- sources from Utah State University in livestock — wildlife rela- tionships and a Veterinary Medical degree in 1997. Since 2003 Dr. DeLiberto has been the National Wildlife Disease Coordi- nator for WS, and his current duties include coordinating re- search and management of wildlife diseases and developing a wildlife disease surveillance and emergency response system. Associate editor: Applegate Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 10:11 AM �C VE D To: Scott Neal: Jeff Long VV Cc: Susan Howl Subject: Fw: JUN 0 9 2011 Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: JEAN PIERRE LOBO [mailto:jean0579 @gmail.comj Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 20119:46 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Greedings. I writte to ask why a govermente can allow any kind of abuses with animals, as Ghandy said, the culture of a population can be judged by the way they treat their animals. The abuse on animals is the reflect of a disfuntional society. thanks JEAN 1 H nwl .rom: Lynette Biunno .ent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 11:26 AM LIUN 9 2��� To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl ----------- Subject: FW: Please do not use cruel steel -jaw traps! This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long i Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno()ci edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families Doing Business From: mindy.g.frye @gmaii.com [mailto:mindy.g.frye @gmail.com] On Behalf Of Mindy Frye Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 11:07 AM To:.James Hovland; Lynette Biunno Subject: Please do not use cruel steel -jaw traps! To whom it may concern: As a resident of the city of Edina, I am writing you to ask you to please oppose the cruel use of steel -jaw traps and poisons to rid the city of coyotes. Surely there are more humane ways to re- locate wayward coyotes from the city? Do we need to maim and kill them? Steel -jaw traps, even rubber- coated ones, cause immense pain and injury. Terrified, the trapped animals are further injured in their frantic struggle to get free. Bones snap, flesh tears, and many victims chew or twist off their own limbs in order to escape. These traps are also indiscriminant. Any animal, including our beloved companion animals can fall prey to traps and to poisons.- I urge you to please find more humane ways to deal with this problem. Thank you, Mindy Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 12:47 PM JUN 0 9 2011 To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FK leg hold traps are in inhumane I _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. - =< , Lynette Biunno, Receptionist - ` 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 corn I www.CitvofEdinaIbiunnoD - ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: schottskil @gmail.com [mailto:schottskil @gmail.com] On Behalf Of Renee Schott Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 11:30 AM To: James Hovland; Lynette Biunno Subject: leg hold traps are in inhumane Hi there, My name is Renee Schott and I am a wildlife veterinarian at the Wildlife Rehabilitation Center of Roseville. I am not sure if it is true, but I had heard the city of Edina was considering using leg hold traps to control coyote populations. In my professional opinion, leg hold traps are inhumane. Although the American Veterinary Medical Association favors modern leg hold traps over antiquated ones (hqp://www.avma.org/press/rel'6ases/080520 troping.asp) there are many risks to using modern leg hold traps - if the spring is not at the appropriate strength or the haws aren't set to the appropriate distance, it can cause as much damage (fractures, skin wounds, pressure.sores, amputations) as old ones; if the trap is not the appropriate size, non target species may be captured. Additionally, if modern leg hold traps are to be used, the AVMA supports the use of modern leghold traps only if used in conjunction with trap monitors and tranquilizers, both of which are very expensive and require many people to monitor effectively. Large, humane cage traps (which much be checked at least every 24 hours) are a simpler and more humane option for trapping coyotes. This email does not imply whether or not I support trapping and relocation of coyotes or not; it is.-simply stating my professional opinion on leg hold traps. Finally, my opinion is not necessarily the opinion of the Wildlife Rehabilitation Center of Roseville (it is my own personal opinion). Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Renee Schott DVM Susan Howl 'rom: Lynette Biunno ,ent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 11:17 AM 2 ro: Scott Neal; Jeff Long E LS I E D Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Request to Edina to ban use of steel traps for coyote Jt UN O 1, 9 2011 Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. =� Lynette Biunno, Receptionist ;f Ef ; , i'; 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 Ibiunno(fti.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Stefani Tran [mailto:stefanitran @yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 20118:45 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Request to Edina to ban use of steel traps for coyote June 9, 2011 To the Honorable Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, and Ann Swenson on the Edina City Council: I am a Northfield resident and a 3 -year volunteer at Prairie's Edge Humane Society. I have heard your city is considering trapping local coyotes in steel jaw traps. I am sure you can imagine yourself or your own pet stepping into such a device and recognize that steel traps inflict incredible pain and suffering upon those inside them. Animals have been known to dismember their own limbs to release themselves from the pain of steel jaw traps. I hope your city council will consider another measure for coexisting with Edina's wildlife, such as predetermining a number of licenses given to hunters who must stay within .a kill quota. Carleton College occasionally allows for a similar controlled hunt for deer within the college's premises. Thank you for your consideration and compassion. My best to you and your fine city! Sincerely, Stefani Tran 1805 Truman Court Northfield, MN 55057 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 11:22 AM (� n To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long E V Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Coyote Problem JUN 0 9 2011 Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. r Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(fti.edina.mmus I www.CityofEdina.com For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Gary Rosen [mailto:westwind952 @comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 20119:16 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Coyote Problem Good Morning. My name is Gary Rosen. I have lived in Edina over 33 years on West Shore Drive, across from the wooded area of Roselyn Park. I want to voice my opposition to any use of steel leg hold traps being used in Edina. They are cruel and-inhumane to any animal. Keep in mind that there is always a chance that the trap will victimize an innocent animal or child. Please find other humane ways of controlling the coyote population. Thank you, Gary Rosen 6500 West Shore Drive. 1 Susan Howl om: Lynette Biunno 09, 2011 12:59 PM JUN 0 9 2011 .ent: Thursday, June To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl ______________ Subject: FW: coyotes Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. _. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 I Fax 952-826-0389 f Ibiunno(fti.edina.mn.us I www CitvofEdina.com ...For Living. Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Joan Orke [mailto:joanorke @comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 12:22 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: coyotes To: The Edina City Council The Honorable Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, and Ann Swenson Dear City Council Members, I heard you are planning on trapping the coyotes in Edina, possibly using leg hold traps. I understand your frustration and concern for safety. I live in Bryn Mawr in Minneapolis and we have had the same problems. But trapping and removing or killing never works. A new batch will move in. I have watched cycles of wildlife change in the city for twenty years. As more and more wildlife habitat is destroyed in the exurbs and on farms the animals adapt and come here. I believe they follow the railroad lines into the city. It is clear you need to do something and I urge you to involve the Wildlife Rehabilitation program at the Hennepin County Humane Society to find a humane solution. Other wise you will find yourself in a never ending cycle of trapping. I can tell you if you use the leg hold trap there will be a huge outcry against you with all the negative publicity that comes with the cruel method. Respectfully, Joan Orke 1 Cncan MnvA From: Lynette Biunno EC.E v Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 11:15 AM To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long JUN 0 9 2011 Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Steel Traps for Coyotes Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. r Lynette Biunno, Receptionist flFi 952- 927 -8861 i Fax 952 -826 -0389 IbiunnoCrDci edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com For Living, Learning, Raising Families Doing Business From: David Browning [mailto:browning429 @yahoo.coml Sent: Thursday, June 09, 20118:36 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Steel Traps for Coyotes To The Honorable Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague and Ann Swenson Edina City Council, My understanding is that the City of Edina is considering using steel traps to kill coyotes. Traps are dangerous on all levels including for unsuspecting companion animals. Please stop all cruel trapping efforts. Thank you for your time. Julie Vandelanotte 1 Susan Howl ,ent:Lynette y, June 2 C E 0� E DD ,ent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 1:31 PM is `� L� V LS L..� To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl JUN 0 9 2011 Subject: FW: Trapping Animals is NEVER acceptable. Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist �n 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno a(-ci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com For Lining, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Sheila Gittleman Locketz [mailto :Sheila @GittlemanGroup.com] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 1:24 PM To: James Hovland; Lynette Biunno Subject: Trapping Animals is NEVER acceptable. I am horrified by this plan. I am a realtor (30+ years), past Parkwood Knolls resident and a pet owner. I cannot believe you will do this. There are other, better alternatives and I suggest you find one. Trapping animals went out with whippings at school (or at least it should have). Domestic pets are at risk, can and will be tortured and mutilated in traps. DON'T DO IT! Please reconsider. Many suburbs are struggling with the same problem. Work together for a better solution. Thank you, Sheila Gittleman Locketz Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 1:03 PM To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Plans to Kill Coyotes In Edina Attachments: please read this article about trapping coyotes.pdf Hello there, JUN 0 9 2011 This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. . Lynette Biunno, Receptionist } r 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 N = Ibiunno(cD-ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com -', ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Ann ( mailto :ak @melandsettlements.com] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 12:44 PM To: James Hovland; Lynette Biunno Subject: Plans to Kill Coyotes In Edina Thanks for reading this. I work in Edina and live in Richfield. I'm a huge animal lover, have 5 (indoor) cats and a dog. I volunteer at the Wildlife Rehab Center in Roseville and have a DNR permit to raise baby wild animals that I receive from them. Coincidentally, I recently had two baby coyotes. They were delightful and my heart breaks to think people hate them so much. Your plan to set steel traps or shoot coyotes really shocked me. I can't believe you would even consider such cruelty in this day and age. While I understand the need to protect homeowners and pets, I sincerely hope you'll consider using a more humane method such as a live trap. Steel traps, even when "lined" are extremely painful, cause trapped animals to fiercely fight for their lives and cause extensive damage. Even though you are having "professionals" manage this project, I wonder if they can guarantde they will prevent a child, adult, domestic cat, dog, etc from accidently or inadvertently getting caught in a trap. Dogs caught in these traps have been seriously maimed and have been killed. We must learn to live in harmony with nature and not destroy it. I'm attaching an article that the vet from the Wildlife Center sent you. Please read it. I know the Wildlife Rehab Center would be glad to help with a more humane solution to this and any wildlife issues. Please call me (612- 839 -4571) or Lynnette Scott at the Wildlife Rehab Center 651 - 486 -9410 (ext. 113) if you'd like help with this. Having pets all c life, I s responsible. le. It is not all of possible d sear hing for dens to shoot another leave babies figure out which coyote Is responslb behind, adding additional cruelty. Thanks. Ann Kinney Susan Howl 'rom: Lynette Biunno - .ent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 2:44 PM 0 e 2011 ro: Scott Neal; Jeff Long JUN 7 Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Potential plans for coyotes _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long Lynette Biunno, Receptionist :��I ?'- 952 - 927 -8861 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 ` .;. Ibiunno6ci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ...For Living. Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Jessica Olson [mailtoJessa_cita @yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 2:23 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Potential plans for coyotes Hello, I am writing to you because it has been brought to my attention that the city of Edina is considering using cruel steel -jaw traps to catch and kill coyotes. Steel -jaw traps, even rubber- coated ones, cause immense pain and injury. Terrified, the trapped animals are further injured in their frantic struggle to get free; bones snap, flesh tears, and many victims chew or twist off their own limbs in order to escape. Needless to say, this is incredibly inhumane & cruel. These traps are also indiscriminant; any animal, including beloved companion animals, can fall prey. As a concerned resident of Edina, I am urging you to find more humane ways to deal with the problem - like perhaps relocating coyotes who have come into the city. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Jessica Olson i Susan Howl From: Sent: Lynette Biunno Thursday, June 09, 2011 1:05 PM 2 ° LAC E � V pp E 2 To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl JUN 0 9 2011 Subject: FW: Do NOT allow steel -jaw traps Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952-826-0389 4 IbiunnoQci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Jane Norling [mailto:kmtcomm @frontiernet.net] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 12:55 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Do NOT allow steel -jaw traps Edina City Council: The Honorable Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, and Ann Swenson I have read the city of Edina is considering using steel -jaw traps to catch and kill coyotes. These are dangerous, cruel, inhumane devices that wildlife and animal rescue groups have fought to ban for years. Even rubber - coated steel jaws cause horrible pain and extensive injuries, often to beloved family pets — and young children are also in danger. Terrified animals struggle frantically to get free, breaking bones, opening gash wounds, and try to chew or twist off their own limbs in order to escape. This agony goes on for HOURS'while they slowly bleed to death or infections take over. These cruel traps should be banned state wide, no exceptions, and certainly not allowed in a residential community like Edina. Jane Norling KMT Communications 5450 Ridgewood Cove Mound, MN 55364 -8238 Ph 952 - 472 -7155 kmtcomm(a frontiernet.net Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 8:03 AM To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long RECEWED Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Traps and killing JUN 13 2011 Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno @ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families &Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Ellen Barr [ mailto :rebel_rambler69 @yahoo.comj Sent: Thursday, June 09, 20116:01 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Traps and killing Please reconsider your decision to trap coyotes. Your actions would be cruel and inhumane. Thank you, Ellen Barr Coon Rapids MN Sent from my Wad 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 10:37 AM To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Trapping of coyotes RECEOVED JUN 0 9 20H Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 I Fax 952 - 826 -0389 (� IbiunnoCaaci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Ricki Disdier [mailto:rickid23 @hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 20117:36 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Trapping of coyotes Honorable members of the Edina City Council, I urge you not to trap coyotes using steel -jaw traps. Even rubber - coated traps cause extreme pain and suffering to animals. (And other animals could be trapped, too.) Steel -jaw trapping is a barbaric practice and I respectfully request that you not even consider it. Common human decency should be the leading factor here. I live in Minneapolis, not Edina, so my request might not hold much weight, but I do hope you will not allow use of steel - jaw traps. Thank you. Ricki Disdier 1149 14th Ave SE Minneapolis, MN P Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 8:14 AM To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: coyotes Hello there, E1 RRECEWED 2011 This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 s , Ibiunno(c?ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Lbarning, Raising Families S Doing Business From: Jessie Stensrud [mailto:stensrud27 @gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 20116:04 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: coyotes Please read the following links before allowing steel jaw traps to be used for the capture of coyotes in Edina. http• / /www animal -free net/peta/steel -jaw- traps -are- alive- and- mutiIatinR/ http•/ /animal crueltyfacts.net /fact/34 http• / /www vancouversun com/ life /Sechelt +iniured +leghold +trap +wolf /4618091 /story.htmi I understand that the coyotes have become a problem for many people living there. I also have a dog and would be devastated if anything happened to him, especially being attacked by a wild animal. But killing an innocent animal in such a cruel manner is not the answer. Please reconsider and look into other options. Steel -Jaw Traps Are Alive and Mutilating I Animal Free Lifestyle Page 1 of 2 , Anima Free Lifes�e- Ve_ F ANIMAI , V G LIFE_ _ : AdChoices Humane Society See us on TV? Help the Humane Society save animals! Give today. secure. HumaneSociety. org Animal Shelter Adoption Get personalized flea solutions Visit the Hartz@ Diagnosis Center www. Ha rtzu1traGua rd. c9m Pet Euthanasia at Home Twin Cities Area 8am- 8pm, 7 days /wk Call Dr. Rebecca at (651) 354 -9423 Minnesota Pets.net Kauai Pet Health Care Compassionate vet care for your pet Kalaheo, Kauai, Hawaii parad seanimalchnic.com Local Animal Shelters Find Local animal shelters for homeless pets, cats & dogs. yellowpages.com The Number Of College -aged Vegetarians Is On The Rise The Number Of College -aged Vegetarians Is On The Rise Clip: USDA Recalls 96.000 lbs. of Tainted Beef from One Family Ringling Unloads Old, Ailing Elephants The Indian Vegan Kitchen: More Than 150 Quick and Healthy Homestyle Recipes The Number Of College -aged Vegetarians Is On The Rise Ringling Unloads Old, Ailing Elephants Ringling Unloads Old, Ailing Elephants Clip: USDA Recalls 96.000 lbs. of Tainted Beef from One Family Steel -Jaw Traps Are Alive and Mutilating 1 -DAY DEALS EnA IL ADDRESS r- . YOUR 7..IP CODE. r -_- _ : =:- By ,j,*ing. You agree in the Pmncv Pnficy and T-. M use. i livingsocle, If you think cruel steel -jaw traps used to snare animals are a thing of the past, think again. Animal protection group Born Free USA just released the results of its undercover investigation of professional and recreational wildlife trapping in the U.S. The horrific video footage shows how animals trapped for their fur suffer, sometimes for days, before dying. A bobcat is caught in a leghold trap in New Mexico. PHOTO CREDIT: Born Free USA / Respect for Animals • yrr .yrMli. U Iowa The trapper kills the red fox by crushing the fox's chest and lungs with his foot in Pennsylvania in January 2011. The fox is restrained by a catch pole. PHOTO CREDIT: Born Free USA / Respect for Animals httn-/ /www anima]- free. net /neta/steel -iaw- traps- are - alive- and - mutilating/ 6/13/2011 Steel -Jaw Traps Are Alive and Mutilating I Animal Free Lifestyle Page 2 of 2 trap in New Mexico. PHOTO CREDIT: Born Free USA / Respect for Animals C The widely used steel -jaw traps crush animals' limbs and are so painful that animals sometimes mutilate their own bodies in an attempt to free themselves. Another trap, the Conibear, crushes animals' necks and chests, taking three to eight minutes to suffocate them. Animals caught in traps that are set underwater take up to nine agonizing minutes to drown. And the target animals aren't the only ones who get caught in these traps. Born Free USA estimates that one in three victims are other animals, including many homeless or lost dogs and cats. Born Free's executive vice president, Adam Roberts, says, "Commercial fur trapping dates back to the 1600s and has hardly changed. It remains barbaric and most people are not even aware that this is going on in most of the U.S." Even though more than 80 countries and some U.S. states have banned steel -jaw traps, they are still legal in most of the country . What are we waiting for? C 2011 Animal Free Lifestyle The only way not to support the fur - trapping industry is to refuse to buy any item containing fur. Please sign PETA's Pledge to Be Fur -Free today. And if you've ever even considered wearing animal fur, this video is for you. Written by Michelle Sherrow The PETA Files Insure Animal Shelters w animalshelWnnsurano=.com Insurance Program for all types of Animal Welfare Organizations. Humane Society Checks GirlyChecks.com Check Designs Perfect For You. Low Prices - Great Quality. Buy Now! Animal Care Vehicles laboitcom La Bolt builds mobile workplaces. Request info online now. Pets a Go Go LLC w clawznpawswm - Pet Sitting Dog Walking & More! New Clients Save 10% AdChwces > hrtn- / /www animal- free. net /Deta/steel -iaw- traps- are - alive- and - mutilating/ 6/13/2011 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 4:02 PM To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long f['� E � �� Cc: Susan Howl lfll Subject: ' FW: I ,IUN 13 2011 Hello there, This message, as small as it is, is being forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 IbiunnoC rDci. edina.mn.usIwww.CityofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: HEIDI AHLSTRAND [mailto:ironrancher @yahoo.com] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 3:32 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: oppose all trapping efforts. It. 1 C„ n 41nw1 From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 8:25 AM To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Please don't allow steel -jaw traps to catch and kill coyotes 1111ECE V E® JUN 13 2011 Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. =- Lynette Biunno, Receptionist rFlr,, N 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 > Ibiunnoaci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: janet kessler [mailto:jannyck @aol.com] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 11:53 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Please don't allow steel -jaw traps to catch and kill coyotes The Honorable Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, and Ann Swenson Edina City Council Please, please do not allow the use of steel -jaw traps to catch and kill coyotes. These are immensely cruel contraptions or essentially torture devices. Other animals, including pets, can get "caught" in these traps. Thank you for listening and for trying to understand the animals. Sincerely, Janet Kessler www.coyoteyipps.com 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno R LACE V V E Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 8:21 AM To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long SUN 13 2011 Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: coyote trapping Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. _ Lynette Biunno, Receptionist N 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 1. _� �, Ibiunno[)ci.edina.mn.us I %+Mnv QtvofEdina,com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: ShadowOfKage @aol.com [mailto:ShadowOfKage @aol.com] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 20118:11 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: coyote trapping please stop this practice IP c.. ., unwl 'rom: Lynette Biunno Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 8:28 AM JUN 13 2011 To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Please don't use steel -jaw traps for coyotes! _ _ _ _ _ Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitVofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Emily Anderson [mailto:montanaela @gmail.comj Sent: Friday, June 10, 20116:44 PM To: James Hovland; Lynette Biunno Subject: Please don't use steel -jaw traps for coyotes! I recently heard about the city of Edina considering using steel -jaw traps to capture coyotes. Many animals get trapped and suffer needlessly,including companion animals. The trapped animals are terrified and can suffer for hours before dying. Please seek a humane way of capturing coyotes. Don't use any cruel trapping method. Thank you for your consideration. -Emily Uncage the Animals -Free For All! Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 8:25 AM To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: coyotes in Edina HhULcL-=uvt JUN 13 2011 Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. - Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -88611 Fax 952- 826 -0389 Ibiunnomki.edina.mn.us i www.CitvofEdina.com ` For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Bmsiness From: CelticThorn49 @aol.com [mailto:CelticThorn49 @aol.com] Sent: Friday, June 10, 20116:16 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: coyotes in Edina Let us think of a better plan than. trapping in any form, let known trapping with INHUMAN steel traps. There are many coyotes where I live. They harm no human & all live in harmony. America's answer to all things that don't exactly fit into their control issues, is simply to KILL. Look at what happened at the MN Zoo Wednesday. Killing a completely innocent indangered species because it slipped through one of the zoos shabby fences. Don't follow in their footsteps. MN Animal rights activist 1 Cucan Hnwi -ronn: Lynette Biunno u u IEC IE V" E Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 8:35 AM To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long JUN 13 2011 Cc: Susan Howl Subject: Fw: Coyote story in the Star Tribune on 6/11/11 Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 -826 -0389 Ibiunno(cDci edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Buiness From: Amanda Simons [ mai Ito: amandajsimons @gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, June 11, 2011 12:34 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Re: Coyote story in the Star Tribune on 6/11/11 Dear City Council Members and Mayor Hovland, As I was reading this morning's Star Tribune I noticed an article about a coyotes in Edina and the possibility of moving beyond neighborhood education to more extreme measures of trapping and killing the coyotes. Sadly I was unaware of any public remarks or concern about coyotes in our city otherwise I would have desired to participate in a conversation about coyotes in our city and how to live with them. My husband and I own our home at 5725 Olinger Rd near Bredesen Park and I am aware of coyote tracks there and reports of coyotes running through my own backyard and that of my neighbors. I disagree most firmly with the article's listed complainer, an Edina woman whose dog was eaten by a coyote, and the possibility of the council's response to the complaint that the city is not doing enough to protect homeowners and their pets. I am a pet owner and I take precautions for my own pets for their protection, while I understand the woman's grief over the loss of her dog, the direct cause of her grief is not the fault of the coyote nor the city but rather her own for not providing adequate protection and oversight of her pet. I hope that you will not cater to her misplaced grief by allowing the killing of any coyotes in our city. The coyotes are not the ones whom should be harmed or affected by the loss of their natural habitat due to human encroachment. We the residents are the ones in their home not the other way around, which is why I am happy that coyotes and deer and other wildlife run through my backyard. will continue to do whatever I may to support wildlife and to diminish my effect on their lives. I ask that you carefully consider any action you take, and if you decide to alter the city's current goal of education about wildlife including coyotes and continue along a path of trapping and hunting our coyotes, then please relocate them to a state park or forest. Sincerely, Amanda Simons (651) 210 -7480 Susan Howl From: pamelak2099 @comcast.net [mailto:pamelak2099 @comcast.net] JUN 13 2011 Sent: Friday, June 10, 20116:50 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Coyotes in Edina Joni Bennett, Mary Brundle, Josh Sprague and Ann Swenson City Council Edina, Minnesota Dear Council Members, As a resident of Saint Paul, I am aware of the coyotes that are wandering through your City of Edina. Yes, you are faced with protecting the residents of your community - however, using steel jaw traps is the most cruel and inhumane way of dealing with this problem. These coyotes are beautiful animals and do not deserve such treatment. What about returning them to a more natural habitat and letting them live out their lives in peace. Remember, the human population has infringed upon their habitat. Thank you for considering an alternative. Sincerely, Pamela Krueger pamelak2099@comcast. net 2099 Village Lane Apartment C4 Saint Paul, MN 55116 i Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno 2 p� Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 8:48 AM R EC E � V E D To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long v Cc: Susan Howl JUN 1 3 2011 Subject: FW: coyotes in Edina Hello there, i This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long Lynette Biunno, Receptionist D' 1';' 952- 927 -88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno0ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Deniz & Sam Anderson -McCoy [mailto:septchatsfoux @yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 2:02 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: coyotes in Edina To the Honorable Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, and Ann Swenson, I am writing to ask you not to use steel traps to attempt to capture coyotes. These traps are inhumane and may trap other wild animals, family pets, or even children. Please put a great deal of thought and research into this before you act. You do not want to do something that you may greatly regret later. Thank you! Deniz A -McCoy Susan Howl From: Sent: Lynette Biunno Monday, June 13, 2011 8:46 AM R E C E � p /J E Ifll LS 15 V 15 To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Subject: Susan Howl FW: Wolf Traps JUN 13 2011 Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno @ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Jennifer Matteo Thompson [mailto :josh- jenthompson @hotmail.comj Sent: Monday, June 13, 201112:00 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Wolf Traps Please, be humane and consider non violent Ways to relocate theses Beautiful animals. We are encroaching on there space. Please I emplore you not to use Traps to Deal with this issue. Thank you for your time. Jennifer Lynn Thompson Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone 1 Susan Howl Utachments: Twin- Cities - Region.pdf; Edina.pdf RECEW From: Julia Parenteau [mailto:juliap @mpisrealtor.com] Sent: Monday, June 13, 20112:43 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Edina Housing Statistics - May 2011 Good Afternoon, Mayor Hovland, Members of the Council, and Mr. Neal - In an effort to provide you with the most valuable resources possible, the Minneapolis Area Association of REALTORS® will be sending you monthly housing statistics for the City of Edina and the Twin Cities metro area as a whole. Below and attached please find information on the most recent home sale statistics, which describe our market in May 2011. You may also be interested in seeing more in -depth statistics and figures for your city, or other cities and counties in the metro _ please feel free to check out our online statistical reports at www.mplsrealtor.com. You will likely find The Thing, our interactive market analytics tool, to be the most interesting, as it offers many choices of variables for your review. Check it out here: http • / /thething.mplsrealtor.com/ Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions about home sales or the real estate industry in general. Minneapolis, Minnesota – Pending sales for May 2011 in the 13- county Twin Cities metropolitan area were up 13.2 percent over last year's post -tax credit market. The 4,428 signed contracts was the second year- over -year increase in the past 13 months. Sellers introduced 7,021 new properties to the market, a 10.8 percent increase from the year prior. Inventory shrunk 11.8 percent to 25,636 units —the lowest May inventory count since 2005. The overall median sales price declined 12.6% to $152,950 as value- minded consumers continued to shop for bargains. Distressed properties made up only 29.8 percent of all new listings —the lowest level since April 2010. The fact that comparatively more homes in financial distress are selling off the market than are entering the market is a positive sign. On average, it now takes 148 days for a home to sell, marking three consecutive months of declines. Months supply of inventory, now at 8.5 months, is down from nearly 12.0 months during the summer of 2008. Julia Parenteau Public Affairs Director Minneapolis Area Association of REALTORS® p. (952) 988 -3124 e. iuliap i)mplsrealtor.com X The200+ MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association Housing Market Updates for the Twin Cities �f REALTORS' +14.5% - 29.0% + 7.7% ....................................................................................... ............................... ................... .... Change in Change in Change in New Listings Closed Sales Median Sales Price Edina.... ...........................I... 9.......................................,,.....................,,.......,.....,............ ............................... May 2010 2011 New Listings i 117 134 +14.5% Closed Sales 238 69 49 -29.0% Median Sales Price` +0.9% $352,000 $379,000 +7.7% Average Sales Price' $208 $445,749 $436,116 -2.2% Price Per Square Foot' 178 $222 $211 -5.2% Percent of Original List Price Received` 90.9% 89.5% -1.6% Days on Market Until Sale i 201 141 -29.9% Inventory of Homes for Sale 505 438 -13.3% Months Supply of Inventory 8.5 8.2 -3.0% ' Does not account for seller concessions. 1 Activity for one month can sometimes look extreme due to small sample size. May 2010 .2011 Year to Date 661 134 544 Year to Date 2010 2011 +/- j 661 544 -17.7% 1 238 209 -12.2% $330,000 $333,000 +0.9% $398,965 $444,120 +11.3% $210 $208 -1.3% 91.0% 89.0% -2.2% 178 164 -7.7% 2010 ■2011 -12.2% Closed Sales Twin Cities Region aos� Edina 7 -2010 1 -2011 Each dot represents the change in median sales price from the prior year using a 6 -month weighted average. This means that each of the 6 months used in a dot are proportioned according to their ihat — rinri. All data comes from the Regional Multiple Listing Service. Inc. I Powered by 1 OK Research and Marketing. I Sponsored by Royal Credit Union -" www.rcu.org The 200+ lousing Market Updates for the Twin Cities Twin Cities Region MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association of REALTORS` +11.2% -18.3% -11.4% ............................................................................................................................... ............................... Change in Change in Change in New Listings Closed Sales Median Sales Price ................................................................................................................................ ............................... May Year to Date 2010 2011 + / — 2010 2011 New Listings 1 6,358 7,072 +11.2% ( 40,006 32,352 -19.11/0 Closed Sales 4,457 3,642 -18.3% i 16,279 14,697 -9.7% Median Sales Price' $175,000 $155,000 -11.4% $168,025 $146,998 - 12.5% Average Sales Price` $206,939 $196,319 -5.1% I $203,095 $187,424 -7.7% Price Per Square Foot' ! $140 $123 -12.1% I $135 $118 -12.1% Percent of Original List Price Received' 94.1% 91.2% -3.1% i 93.7% 89.5% -4.5% Days on Market Until Sale 116 148 +27.4% I 126 152 +20.4% Inventory of Homes for Sale 29,058 25,636 -11.8% -- -- -- M tit S I of Inventory f 7.6 8.5 +11.9% on s upp y Does not account for seller concessions. 9 Activity for one month can sometimes look extreme due to small sample size. May 2010 .2011 Year to Date 7,072 40,006 13=Q +11.2% -18.3% New Listings Closed Sales 2010 ■ 2011 32,352 -19.1% -9.7% New Listings Closed Sales Change in Median Sales Price from Prior Year (6 -Month Average) ** +10% +5% 0% -5% -10% -15% -20% - 25% 1 -2008 Twin Cities Region �® Twin Cities Region 7 -2008 1 -2009 7 -2009 1 -2010 7 -2010 1 -2011 Each dot represents the change in median sales price from the prior year using a 6 -month weighted average. This means that each of the 6 months used in a dot are proportioned according to their eh— of —1 =s rlurino that oeriod. I All data comes from the Regional Multiple Liming Service. Inc. I Powered by 10K Research and Marketing. I Sponsored by Royal Credit Union " www.rcu.org Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 2:53 PM To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Steel Traps: Coyotes Hello there, RECEOV JUN 14 1011 This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist �i 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(cD.ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: krisdock @aol.com [mailto:krisdock @aol.com] Sent: Monday, June 13, 20112:22 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Steel Traps: Coyotes To the Edina city council, 1 have recently been notified that Edina, my town of residence, is considering the use of steel traps to catch coyotes. I beg that you do not do this. These are animals that are searching for food as they are quickly losing their natural habitat, and we are fortunate to have live -catch traps so that these animals can be released into a less- populated area. The issue with steel traps is that they are cruel and inhumane. When the animals are captured, they suffer indefinitely, by either dying a slow, painful death or chewing off their own limb to escape, and proceeding to suffer and die outside of the trap. Secondly, these traps do not discriminate. A loose dog, cat, etc. could easily be killed by one of these traps, simply if they escape from their owner's house. Please consider utilizing live traps. Coyotes have the right to live in their habitat. Best, Kristin Dockery Susan Howl rom: Lynette Biunno .ient: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 8:39 AM _ To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long (� O p p (C E Cc: Susan Howl v l� Subject: FW: steel jaw traps JUN 1 4 2011 - Hello there, u------- - - - - -- This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 IbiunnoPci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families &Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Susan Donohue [ mailto :bluesky0l @goldengate.net] Sent: Monday, June 13, 20117:04 PM To: James Hovland; Lynette Biunno Subject: steel jaw traps I urge you not to consider using steel jaw taps for trapping coyotes as has been presented. Not only is this cruel and inhumane treatment for animals, but the effects can be devastating in the community too. A house pet or even a child could become ensnared. Let's move into the 21st century and figure out an alternative. Thank you for your consideration. Susan Donohue 1 C.. n LJnwl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 3:28 PM To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl Subject: F1N: Coyote Traps Hi there, IMECENtheD JUN 14 2011 This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. �<.. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist P, \'= 952-927-88611 Fax 952 -826 -0389 Ibiunno(Dci edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com For Living, Learning, nising Families & Doing Business From: brittanyprice @wellsfargo.com [mailto :brittanyprice @wellsfargo.com] Sent: Monday, June 13, 20112:46 PM To: James Hovland; Lynette Biunno Subject: Coyote Traps All, Steel -jaw traps, even rubber - coated ones, cause immense pain and injury. Terrified, the trapped coyotes are further injured in their frantic struggle to get free. Bones snap, flesh tears, and many victims chew or twist off their own limbs in order to escape. The proposed coyote traps are careless and cruel. Please oppose all cruel trapping efforts in the city of Edina. Sincerely, Brittany Price Brittany Price Lease Negotiator Corporate Properties Group Wells Fargo Bank 190 South 7th St., 19th Floor I Minneapolis, MN 55479 MAC N9305 -19B Tel 612 - 667 -7908 1 Ce11 612 - 226 -5143 1 Fax 612 - 316 -1212 brittanvorice(a)wel Isfa roo. com 1 June 10, 2011 Mayor James Hovland Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 The Honorable Mayor Hovland, RE: Coyotes in Edina JUN 14 2011 I am writing to respectfully urge the City of Edina to find humane ways to eliminate coyotes and not exterminate them with poison, traps and other cruel killing methods. The sad reality is that most traps are notoriously indiscriminate. Animals who are caught in any type of trap can suffer for days before succumbing to exposure, shock, or attacks by predators, and traps often maim or kill "nontarget" animals, including dogs, cats and endangered species. Poisoned animals die a horrific, excruciating, and slow (it usually takes between 3 and 15 hours) death. Exposure can result in cardiac failure, progressive failure of the central nervous system, or respiratory arrest following severe prolonged convulsions. Living in close proximity with wild animals increases the likelihood of encountering animals in our neighborhoods. Every year millions of wild animals considered "nuisances" by some, are killed without exploring viable alternatives. However some communities around the country are taking no action to eradicate coyotes and, are instead, learning to co- exist. Please reconsider and explore other options to "defend" Edina against bothersome wildlife. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Ursula Pelka 6205 Idylwood Lane Edina, MN 55436 952- 939 -9162 March 23, 2011 The Humane Society of the United States Why Killing Coyotes Doesn't Work Trapping and killing won't stop conflicts with coyotes Leg -hold traps are not only cruel and inhumane for coyotes, but may also injure other wildlife, pets, or even children. For more than a century, human beings have waged a war on coyotes, killing them with poison, traps, guns, hunting dogs, and a variety of other cruel coyote killing methods. Nonetheless, the wary nature of coyotes and their remarkable adaptability has allowed them to quadruple their range throughout North America. As a result, communities across the country are encountering coyotes and experiencing conflicts that they have never had to face before. The presence of coyotes in a community can be alarming to those who are not used to living with them. Occasional attacks by coyotes on pets and coyote aaare p ssion toward eople (although raze) can trigger alarm from people who fear for the safety of their pets and children. To allay this, communities may feel they need to initiate wide scale programs to trap and kill coyotes. These killing programs don't work and are inhumane. Better solutions exist. Why don't coyote killing programs work? They are ineffective. • It is extremely difficult to ensure that the problem - causing coyote(s) will be the one(s) located and killed • Coyotes removed from an area will quickly be replaced by others. Coyote pairs hold territories, which leaves single coyotes ( "floaters ") constantly looking for new places to call home. • If attractants in a neighborhood are not removed (e.g., pet food, garbage, etc.) new coyotes in an area can quickly become "nuisance" coyotes. They won't reduce coyote populations. • Research suggests that when aggressively controlled, coyotes can increase their reproductive rate by breeding at an earlier age, having larger litters, and a higher survival rate among young. This allows coyote populations to quickly bounce back, even when as much as 70 percent of their numbers are removed. • It is nearly impossible to completely eradicate coyotes from an area. Despite bounties and large -scale efforts to kill coyotes over the last 100 years, coyotes have in fact expanded their range throughout the U.S. and Canada tremendously. One study even found that killing 75 percent of a coyote population every year for 50 .years would still not exterminate the population. Removal is costly. • Coyotes are intelligent animals and are difficult to catch. Even a skilled trapper or sharpshooter, at a hefty price tag, will need many hours to catch a targeted coyote. Trapping is inhumane. • The most common devices used to capture coyotes are leg -hold traps and neck snares. Both can cause severe injuries, pain, and suffering. • Pets become unintended victims of traps set for coyotes. An informal search of media reports suggests thousands of unintended incidents have occurred, causing heartbreak for the families affected. • Non - target wild animals are also caught in traps, and many sustain injuries so severe that they die or must be killed. What about diseased coyotes? Some coyote trappers claim that diseased coyotes are to blame for pet attack incidents, and that removing such animals from the population is the answer. This is not the case. • Most pet attacks are caused by healthy, habituated coyotes There is no evidence that coyotes with mange are more likely to attack people or r pets. Mange - afflicted coyoteg can simply appear threatening because they are weak, strange- looking (due to hair loss), and may be found resting in suburban areas during the daytime. • Attacks on dogs during the months of April - December are probably caused by coyotes who have lost their fear of people. This occurs when coyotes are being fed in residential areas and are not chased away by people. • A 10 -year study of over 300 coyotes in the greater Chicago metropolitan area found only two coyotes who had attacked pets. Necropsies done on these coyotes showed that they had been eating pet food, but were otherwise healthy. What does work? Coyotes are here to stay —it's up to us to find ways of coexisting with them. A program combining education in techniques to resolve coyote conflicts and how to discourage coyotes offers the best method for handling and preventing conflicts with coyotes, and is working already in a number of communities. Resources o Purchase a copy of Wild Neighbors, the go -to guide for useful, humane solutions to conflicts with wildlife. • Read the city of Denver's Covote Management Plan. • Visit Project Coyote: promoting an educated coexistence between people and coyotes. RECEWED Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 3:33 PM --- ------------ To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: http: / /edina.kstp.com/ news/ news /edina - pursuing - plan -deal- coyotes- after- dog- attacks /78667 Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno @ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: minu0007 @metnet.edu [mailto:minu0007 @metnet.edu] Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 20112:40 PM To: James Hovland Cc: Lynette Biunno Subject: http: / /edina.kstp.com/ news / news /edina - pursuing -plan -deal- coyotes- after - dog- attacks /78667 http• / /edina kstp com/ news / news /edina - pursuing- plan - deal - coyotes- after -dog- attacks /78667 Steel -jaw traps, even rubber - coated ones, cause immense pain and injury. Terrified, the trapped animals are further injured in their frantic struggle to get free. Bones snap, flesh tears, and many victims chew or twist off their own limbs in order to escape. These traps are also indiscriminant. Any animal, including beloved companion animals, can fall prey. Please reconsider using steel jaw traps as an action. Thank you, Gina Minucci minu0007 metnet.edu Farmington, MN 1 Susan Howl From: John Hamilton [mailto:JHamilton @urban- works.com] R EC E N E Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 20118:59 AM To: Lynette Biunno JUN 1.5 2011 Subject: Nature returns Gentle Leadership; Edina is a delightful, bucolic community, protected from having to face the issues of the world directly; hunger, war, pollution, violence, and even dirt are uncommon occurrences in our little village. We don't have to deal directly with the big issues of the world, fracking shale, terrorists, and crushing unemployment are not agenda items for the City Council so when an opportunity arises to address the larger issues, I think it might be important to try to take as large a view as we can to give the adage "think globally, act locally" real meaning. The coyote issue I think is one of those agenda items where Edina actually can set a standard that can make a difference in the world. As Minnesota is wrestling with the timber wolves endangered species listing on a national scale, so can Edina answer on a local level. For perspective I've included an excerpt from Jack Ewing's book on Exotic and Unseen Costa Rica; if you can take the time to indulge me, I think it is relevant; I have taken a little liberty with the quote but the message is consistent: "The presence of carnivores in this region is a clear sign of a healthy eco- system. Meat eaters are the top of the food chain, and only a well - balanced environment will support a large enough prey base to keep their population stable. If the carnivore's needs occasionally clash with those of humans, we should learn to be tolerant ... We humans are arguably the most intelligent animal on earth and are quite capable of inventing ways to protect our domestic animals without destroying the wildlife. Coyotes kill many more rats, rabbits, and mice than domestic animals... Remember we are the invaders and should always respect our natural environment and look for ways to live in harmony with it." The coyotes will make a significant dent in the rabbit population, thin the deer herd and keep it on the move so it doesn't chew its way through every hosta near the park, and remind us all every day that there is beyond our little corner of heaven a larger world and we need to be vigilant of our stewardship of it. Thanks for your patience. John Hamilton, A1A, LEEU All UrbanWorks Architecture LLc 907. N 3'I Stre.el:. Suite 1.43 1 MplIs, MN 55,101 Ci: 672. °75.3707. 612.455.3199 Vy:4..; ran 4vgiks �Dmm 11hpMi too i rt an nr k ._ml:n Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno R LAC E W E t. Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 12:46 PM To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long JUN 15 2Q11 Cc: Susan Howl . Subject: FW: Please do not use Steel jaw traps to catch coyotes Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 IbiunnoO- ci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com .,.For Living, Learning, Raising Families S Doing Business From: Amy R. Mason [mailto:amason @lindquist.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 11:46 AM To: James Hovland; Lynette Biunno Subject: Please do not use Steel -jaw traps to catch coyotes To whom it may concern: I went to Edina High School and still live within the area. I am writing to express my distress at the consideration of catching coyotes with steel -jaw traps. I understand that coyotes have become a concern recently and have even attached some domestic pets. I do not believe however that this is an appropriate solution. First, it does constitute animal cruelty in my opinion. Second, it puts our domestic pets at risk. In fact, both of my cats recently ended up in live traps that had been set for raccoons. I believe my cats were the only thing these traps ever caught. I think it is a beautiful aspect of living in Minnesota that we have wildlife, even though it brings with it some inconveniences and risks for our pets. We need to figure out better solutions to live in harmony with animals and perhaps part of that solution is learning to accept that we can't control everything around us. Thank you for your consideration of this issue. very truly yours, Amy Mason L I N 0 0 0; S V E N N U M Amy R. Mason I Associate 1 612.371.2427 1 amason @lindguist.com 1 Biography 4200 IDS Center, 80 S 8`h Street, Minneapolis, MN 55402 1 Fax 612.371.3207 Legal Administrative Assistant: Gwen Inskeep 1 612.371.2447 1 ginskeep @lindguist.com NOTICES IRS Circular 230 Notice: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that, except to the extent expressly provided to the contrary, any federal tax advice Susan Howl From: ajriesterer @comcast.net [ mailto:beastslayer33 @gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 12:02 PM JUN 0 9 2011 To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Tap Water > Bottled Water --------------- Dear Mayor Hovland and Council Members, Why are water bottles used in public places all around Edina when tap water is a much better option? Tap water only costs a fraction of what bottled water costs, it is environmentally friendly, and tastes the same if not better than bottled water, so there is no reason why Edina should be promoting and waste money on bottled water in our schools and at government sponsored events when the money could be used for other beneficial purposes. A main consequence of bottled water is the environmental harms that results from the amount of resources used to create plastic bottles and labels. In the book Bottlemania, Royte explains that the amount of oil used per year to create the necessary plastic for water bottles is enough oil to run 100,000 cars for a year and by switching from bottled water to tap water not only could people help preserve non - renewable resources but, people can reduce landfills because surprisingly most water bottles end up in landfills even though they can be recycled. Plastic water bottles should be outlawed throughout Edina and should be switched to tap water so that as a community we can preserve our natural resources and we can produce less contaminants that destroy our pristine wildlife in Minnesota. Besides the fact that bottled water is environmentally unfriendly and Edina, the cost that our government spends on bottled water could be significantly less if Edina were to use tap water for public events and for schools instead of bottled water. In Bottlemania, it says that on average a person can spend up to $1,400 dollars a year on bottled water or they can spend less than one dollar a year on tap water. By switching to tap water, not only would the government be saving money every year but you could use that money to improve countless things around our community including repairing public buildings, purchase supplies for schools and countless other things. Not only is tap water a great deal cheaper than bottled water, tap water has been found to taste the same as bottled water. In the article Thirst for Bottled Water Unleashes Flood of Environmental Concern, the author talks about multiple blind taste tests over a period of one year where most participants could not tell the difference between the tap water and bottled water and tap water even triumphed as best tasting 4 out of 5 times. With tap water tasting the same or even better than bottled water, there should be nothing holding back Edina from switching to the more favorable tasting tap water that also has multiple other benefits that are illustrated above. I urge you to consider converting Edina over to tap water because with its environmental and financial advantages, our community could become more environmentally friendly and save thousands of dollars a year all while receiving the same product. According to Tony Azios, places like "Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Illinois" have already taken the step to ban the use of public funds on bottled water and we too could be a leader for other communities to take this necessary step if our world ever wants to decrease the amount of struggles over water, improve situations of developing countries with communities that need water, and cut down on our environmental pollution. Sincerely, Alex Riesterer RECENED JUN 0 9 2011 Edina City Council James Hovland Joni Bennett Mary Brindle Josh Sprague Ann Swenson Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 6/6/11 5008 W. 56th St Edina, MN 55436 This past Sunday, 6/5/11, several cars on the street where I live were cited in violation of City Code: Section 1.400.10 Subd. 7 Limited Parking Zones. B. Six Hour Parking. No person in charge of any vehicle hours, hall p otherwise designated le to stand anon any street or highway for more than six consecutive installed signs. This paragraph shall not apply to vehicles used by persons while such persons are present and actively engaged in services performed on the premises of others, such as painting, home construction or repair, installation of appliances, cleaning, or fumigating. D. Shifting of Parked Vehicle. To regulate limited parking, any vehicle moved a distance of not more than three tenths of a mile during the limited parking period shall be deemed to have remained stationary. The majority of the cars cited belong to the homeowners. this regulation. surprised as not a single neighbor I talked to was I have lived in Edina for a total of 36 years, and most of my neighbors are also long time residents. My concern over this issue is that the city of Edina has not made it known to the majority of residents about the 6 hour limited parking. Why does the city choose to enforce such a. little known regulation without first informing home owners if they are in violation-and give them the chance to correct it and /or learn the regulation,. as is done when a home owner is in violation of a city code involving "nuiances" on their property? The officer writing out the "tickets" explained that the cars on our block were being ticketed as a complaint had been issued. It is very hard for us residents to understand that cars, less than Ablock ors and myself park for to follow a set a length of time longer than 6 rules that majority of Edina residents do not have to. Along with responding to the above stated concerns, I would also like to have you respond to the following questions. At times in the future, I will be having family members, rs, (along with staying at children who are home from college and have their my house. They will be overnight guests, and there will be more cars at my home that can not fit in my driveway. What living for this, as this is a common occurrence for many of the families lvng on my block? As cited in the code, for a car to be considered "moved" On has to be , brother - moved a distance of more than 3/10 of a m ile. in -law's car was parked on the street in front s car and ran several errands. s' had been marked. Around noon, he took He returned home about an hour later. HeHe observed f heewould ticketing cars, so he spoke briefly with the officer. q uestioned receive a ticket as he had moved his car, yet n t had been when his car on the street directly in front of my h ouse where the tires were marked. The officer recommended i ticketed as he had moved driveway. My question is, could he have b een the car, and had been gone for at least an hour, he have received a ticket a total of much more than the 3/10 mile. Wo uld if he had returned to the same general area and the police officer did not know that that car had been driven? Also, does the "clock" start again after the first 6 hours? After that first 6 -hour violation, can the car be parked on the street ... does the "clock" start again at that time for a 6- hour time frame? In conclusion, I feel as if my neighbors and I are being targeted /harassed by a neighbor. If only a specific area is being ew this as a form of harassment. only due to one complaining neighbor, I vi Thank you for attention to this matter and I look forward to hearing your response to my questions and concerns. Sincerely, Jill Emanuel Susan Howl From: Janet Skalicky [ma ilto:planet.janet @mac.com] 115Q E li„o r- U V C I J,y Sent: Monday, June 13, 2011 10:36 AM JUN 13 2011 To: Lynette Biunno Cc: Janet Skalicky --------------- Subject: More Construction Noise Mayor James Hovland, Scott Neal and the Edina City Council, Our construction nightmare continues next door at 5500 Halifax Lane. Last Friday morning I opened our front door at 7:00 a.m. just as the construction workers were arriving and watched as they parked directly in front of our walkway and smoked their cigarettes. My daughter was waiting for her school bus in the front entry of our home and the cigarette smoke drifted toward her and into our house through the open door. The cigarette butts are then flicked into our street, garden and lawn. The men then spoke in loud voices and threw out the F -bomb several times during their conversation. Not a pleasant way to start the day. Now that the weather is warm we had our windows and screens washed so we can open them and enjoy the fresh air. But they were once again forced shut because of the cloud of fine dust that fills the air when they cut large blocks of stone without a wet saw. Our patio, screens and furniture are covered in fine dust. We will have to remove all of our screens once again and wash them to avoid dust filling our house once we open the windows. I've attached a photo of the dust on our patio for your enjoyment. The rude builder placed all of the utilities on the wall facing our patio. Once the new owner moves in we will have to listen to the sounds of an air conditioning unit, vacuum system vent (which is extremely loud) and exterior speakers. I do believe the decibel level on the vacuum system is at an excessive level and I would like someone from the city to look into that. Other builders such as Great Neighborhood Homes seem to take care to be courteous to neighbors. They have a sign at each of their construction sites informing workers to watch for children, to avoid turning around in neighbors driveways, to avoid playing loud music and to clean up the site at the end of the day. I drive by one of their homes under construction weekly on Halifax Avenue and rarely see anyone working after 6:00 or on weekends. This type of courtesy should be adopted by all builders. Once again, I question why builders in our city seem to have all of the rights and homeowners have none? We have spent many years enjoying our neighborhood but feel this builder has taken over with construction site after construction site. He has plans to tear down another house two houses away so we know the inconvenience will continue. Solvei from the city stopped by to assess the situation and told me that what the builder is doing is allowable. Basically, the builder is allowed to take away our privacy and our quality of life we have enjoyed for years without penalty. I think the city really needs to take a look at it's policies and give homeowners a few rights as well. Janet Skalicky Brian Patty 5440 Halifax Lane Edina, MN 55424 planet. ianet(cD-mac.corn nr- ') 00^ f1'A0r% Begin forwarded message: From: Janet Skalicky <planet.ianet(cD-mac.corn> Date: April 19, 2011 10:37:08 AM CDT To: edinamail @ci.edina.mn.us Subject: Construction Noise - Mayor James Hovland Mayor James Hovland and the Edina City Council For 14 years we have lived in our home on Halifax Lane in Edina. Our children have grown up feeding ducks in our backyard, discovering the Minnehaha Creek and playing at the neighborhood parks. My husband and I have enjoyed many evenings with neighbors catching up with a glass of wine on our patio or hosting the neighborhood book club. Our backyard patio is an extension of our living space on summer days. We love our neighborhood and the tranquility it offers us. Unfortunately, this serenity changed a few years ago when TC Homebuilders began building on our block without regard to neighbors. We have watched 3 lovely homes nearby torn down and replaced with larger, imposing structures. While we are not opposed to remodeling improvements in any neighborhood, we do have a strong aversion to the constant disruptive noise and debris that goes with it. We feel our quality of life has suffered immensely and feel the city should consider the effect of constant construction disruputions on its citizens when passing regulations regarding construction noise time limits. The noise that we've been forced to endure next door at 5500 Halifax Lane has been unbearable. Cutting of large blocks of stone took place from 7 am to 9 pm Monday - Saturday all spring and summer last year with an occasional break on Sunday. We were forced to put up with the noise" on Memorial Day, The Fourth of July, Labor Day, Thanksgiving and Christmas Eve. Entertaining at our home simply was out of the question. The noise was so loud and constant that my children and I were forced to leave our house most summer days to get relief. TC Homebuilders does comply with construction time limits but most builders end their work day at 5 pm and do not work on weekends and do not use every allowable hour to their advantage. Why am I unable to enjoy my home because of the rights of a builder? Who is looking out for my rights as a citizen of Edina? During the summer of 2010 we were unable to open our windows for an entire summer because of the noise and dust. We were not able to go outside until after 9:00 when construction stopped. Dinner was spent inside in our kitchen despite beautiful summer weather. On the rare occassion when construction was not in progress we would have to spray down our patio and all furniture before sitting down to relax. The fact that we were forced into this quality of life made us more and more resentful as the summer progressed. We believe that the city of Edina caters to the builders,with disregard to neighbors and their rights. During the school year, my teen age children made a habit of doing their homework in their rooms with noise reduction headphones over their ears to muffle the sounds. During their summer break they had to accept the fact that sleeping in would not be an option. They were forced up by 7 am all summer long. A neighbor a full block away phoned last summer because of the constant sawing noise. She found it hard to endure a block away and was wondering how I was coping with the noise just next door. In addition to the noise, the mess is also disheartening. Our blue spruce trees, dogwood and bushes on the construction side have all suffered damage and broken branches from the careless construction practices. When demolition took place we were left with glass, insulation and roof tiles littering our property. The climbing roses covering our house were littered with debris up to our roof line. Our stone walkway and gardens were covered in tiny pieces of glass from the shattered windows. Debris remains on the site often blowing into the creek or our property. In fact, looking out on the property today I see a large pile of debris in the street opposite the construction site. The builder who lives 2 houses away, walks by the debris daily without picking it up. This is only a small portion of what we have suffered due to the inconsiderate practices of TC Homebuilders and their ability to work long days and weekends without consequence. I and other neighbors have contacted the Police and other city employees many times without much relief. We fear another nightmare summer is coming since landscaping has yet to begin at 5500 Halifax Lane and yet another home is set for demolition on the block. We are begging the city to set stricter time limits on this builder to give neighbors the ability to enjoy the quality of life that brought them to our Edina neighborhood in the first place. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Janet Skalicky Brian Patty 5440 Halifax Lane Edina, MN 55424 952.924.0325 planet.janetgmac.com ,DIN,. SC / Edina Soccer Club c/o Edina Park & Rec 4801 West 501h Street Edina, MN 55424 June 15, 2011 Edina City Council Members: Mayor James Hovland Joni Bennett Mary Brindle Josh Sprague Ann Swenson Dear Council Members- JUN 16 2011 traveling @edinasoccerclub.com 952 - 826 -0830 x557 www.edinasoccerclub.com We are aware that there is a proposal to the council pending by Shannon Rusk and Oppidan for an athletic dome to be built in Edina. While we fully support the idea of a dome being built in our community, we cannot support the location that is being proposed. Building the facility at the Braemar Park location would take away one of Edina's premier grass fields, one of the best in the area and probably the state. This space is currently used as two intermediate fields for traveling soccer in the summer and fall for our U11 and U12 teams, which makes up two- thirds of our field allocation for this age group. The high school varsity soccer program also uses this facility as a full size field for as many games as possible before Labor Day. After fall traveling soccer concludes, they use it for their high school section playoffs. Braemar has also been the host field for a number of professional exhibition games by the MN Thunder over the years. This July, the NSC Stars will be playing on that field as part of the combined traveling and house league 'Soccer Celebration' events. Building a dome on this site does not create more green space for Edina sports activities. It would, in effect, create the same space with substantially increased costs for the users, and would also destroy the beautiful park and field with its shaded natural amphitheater. The proposal also looks to eliminate the current playground and picnic shelter (one of two memorials in the park)..that both soccer and baseball families utilize greatly, in favor of an expanded parking lot. With a growing number of kids playing soccer, lacrosse, rugby, football, and ultimate Frisbee in both summer and fall seasons, and many of our associations expanding their winter training /off season training, there is greater and greater demand for fields and a huge desire for an indoor training facility in our community. Because of this increasing need for year round field space, we would highly encourage the City of Edina and the Edina School District to discuss our community needs and to involve the athletic associations in the research, planning and possible fundraising for such a facility. Edina Soccer Club (ESC) would support any public or private Edina dome /winter training facility that does not eliminate or negatively impact any of our current field space options. There must be other options available within our community for a domed facility. Perhaps one of the upper fields at the high school could be domed for the winter, or possibly relocate the current Braemar golf dome and build a domed field in its place. Using space at Fred Richards Golf Course is another site that comes to mind. Let's look at all the options and make the best decision for, our entire community. Please feel free to contact either of us to discuss in further detail. We would be happy to assist in whatever way possible. Kind regards, On behalf of the Edina Soccer Club Board (traveling soccer) Brent Rundquist, President Bkrund789 Pearthlink. net 612 - 860 -1550 Ann Buratti, Administrator /Registrar amburatti @aoi.com 952 - 925 -2050 .. City of Edina June 14, 2011 West 59th Street Residents RE: No Parking on West 59th Street Dear Residents: Thank you for taking the time to let us know which side of the street that you wish the "no parking" signs to be installed on. The results of the responses were: two residents would like the. signs placed on the north side of the roadway, one resident would like the signs placed on the south side of the roadway, and one resident does not want any signs placed on the roadway. Based on these results we will be placing the signs on the north side of the roadway. We understand that most of you disagree with placing signs on the street. Due to the roadway being upgraded to the same width the City needs to sign the roadway to accommodate public safety vehicles. We will try to accommodate your requests for placement of the signs and to minimize the number of signs. We thank you for your understanding of this issue. Sincerely, GN�Kv Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer C: Boyd Tate — Traffic Safety Coordinator Edina City Council G %EnoineerinolGenera1%50 59 StreetslWest 591h StreellNo Parklno1201 1 061 4 WH -Edina to 591h SI Residents RE no oarkinadoc City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 Y FAX 952 - 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET TTY 952 - 826 -0379 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 2011 4:27 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Support of Water Senior Housing Project R.ECE M P JUN 0 8 2011 .., Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — � IbiunnoCcDci.edina.mn.us I www.uityofEdina.com ...For Luring, Learning, Raring Families & Doing Business From: Fr. Bob Schwartz [mailto:frbobs @oigparish.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 07, 20114:07 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Support of Water Senior Housing Project To The Edina City Council RE: Agenda Item VII a: Request For Minor Changes To Building —Waters Senior Housing Project I am writing in support of the Waters Senior Housing Project modifications and asking that the council approve their request to include 7 affordable housing units. The research conducted by the Waters project demonstrates over 30% of Edina Seniors qualify for affordable housing; over 3000 of our senior residents. As the pastor of Our Lady of Grace, I believe it is imperative that we care for our seniors, seniors that built this community raised their families in this community and supported Edina to make it the strong, healthy vibrant community it is today. The Waters project modification is a small by significant step to acknowledge the needs of seniors in our community and to give back to those who have given so much. Sincerely, Fr Robert Schwartz Pastor, Our Lady of Grace Catholic Church 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 1:36 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Waters Senior Living Lynette Biunno, Receptionist (J, 1 ` 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(fti.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com - ...For Living, Learning, %L,;ing Families & Doing Business IRI i FE"C;* 2011 From: dianasidea @att.net [mailto:dianasidea @ att.net] Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 1:32 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Waters Senior Living I am concerned that a lot of unnecessary road blocks are being thrown into place to stall the Waters Senior Living project. Many Edina seniors are leaving our community because Edina does not have enough quality senior housing. If the city council is trying to drive seniors out of the community, stalling this project speed up the effort. Pamela Badger i Susan Howl JUN 13 2011 Mayor Hovland,City Council,Scott Neal and Gary Teague, I was at the city council meeting regarding the shelter corporation / Colonial Church Project. I havent receive the letter as promised to be mailed two days after the City Council Meeting. I understand it takes time, but it is not leaving residents much time to respond whether they feel the change is Major or Minor proposed by Shelter Corporation. As a result, I ask that you reschedule the City Council Meeting from June 22nd until July 6th to vote on whether this change is Major or Minor so there is enought time for resident's to weigh in. As you know there is nothing minor about a $30 million plus project. We also would like to request that we are able to have a representative be able to speak at this meeting for 5 minutes in our behalf to clarify our concerns. Mr Jensen got to speak to City Council and we would also like to see that the impacted neighborhood (property tax payers)get their chance. Thankyou Susan Petersen Susan Howl From: Susan Lee Sent: Thu, Jun 9, 2011 2:58 AM To: "joshs @cbburnet.com" Subject: Minor Versus Major Hi Josh! JUN 13 2011 I was in China last week and so I missed your phone call! I haven't further pursued my concept for a learning center, mostly due to lack of time. Where does it go? Thank you for your emailed City Council summaries. Sending out a copy of the Code 850.04 ordinance was very helpful. I watched the 6/7 televised portion and your responses were thoughtful and to the point. Per your request, I will be providing the following email feedback to the Council in regards to the Waters Senior project: I understand residents' concern about this project, but the project has met the planning and City Council requirements to date, and at some point, the City of Edina should offer up some spirit of collaboration to developers and businesses who choose to invest in our city. What this developer is asking seems to be a very minor change. l find it difficult to consider it otherwise. Yes, the developer could have expected the gauntlet from the neighborhood had the building been increased in size, or additional parking spots added, but he is requesting a downsizing! The reason for downsizing will benefit Edina, not the developer. As an architect, it is my experience that no developer chooses to add affordable housing - it simply isn't cost effective. Hence, the reason government agencies will offer financing incentives in hopes of encouraging developers to include these unit types. Usually when we architects and planners talk about an impact to the site plan, it means the addition or removal or change to a major site element (building, roads, parking lots, landscaping). The proposed changes in no way impact the original site plan. Thanks, - -Sue Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 4:02 PM � EC E O � /1(L To: Scott Neal; Jeff Long v.o lG V LS JU Cc: Susan Howl Subject: 1 4 2011 Subect: FW: Waters of Edina Affordable Housing Hello there, - -' This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Scott Neal and Jeff Long Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 IbiunnoAci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com - ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Strand, Erik [mailto:estrand @ecic.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 20113:41 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Waters of Edina Affordable Housing Dear Mayor Hovland and Edina Council Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, and Swenson, I am writing to encourage your support and vote for increasing affordable housing in Edina. In particular, I hope you will approve the proposal to create 7 units of affordable housing at the Waters of Edina. This will be beneficial to the neighborhood and the city and to residents of our city who would like to stay in Edina after moving from their homes. Members of our congregation have been very supportive of such efforts over the years and we look forward to hearing of your votes to enable this wonderful opportunity. Thank you for your work and your stewardship of this city's future. Blessings, Pastor Erik Strand Edina Community Lutheran Church 4113 West 54th Street Edina, MN 55424 952 - 926 -3808 www.ecic.or Phase consider our ens ironment bckOre printing this e -mail Susan Howl 7rom: Lynette Biunno Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 12:51 PM Su Susan Howl W EC E O V E Subject: F1N: Waters Senior Living Project JUN 15 2011 m s - - Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 ?'. Ibiunno0ci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Kit [mailto:kitanddick @att.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2011 12:45 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Waters Senior Living Project I feel that the Waters Senior Living Project is "minor" and can therefore be approved by staff. This project is important to the City of Edina and its residents. Catherine Stuart Schmoker 6616 Biscayne Blvd. Edina, MN 55436 RECEWED Susan Howl From: Kent Gravelle [mai Ito: kentg ravel le@gravellelaw.com] L _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 20117:01 AM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: Barbara Hoganson; Gordon Johnson; christine . hen niger @genmills.com; John Harden Subject: Whether proposed Living Waters change in mass is a minor change. Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, I am sure that the Council is tired of hearing about the Living Waters project and does not wish to subject itself to the possibility of additional hearings on the subject. However, if one reviews Edina Ordinance 850.04, Subd. 3 (I), reproduced below, I do not see how a reduction of the proposed building by 28 feet can be considered a "minor change ". The plain wording of the ordinance states that any proposed change affecting "building coverage" or "mass" "shall be acted on, reviewed and processed by the Commission and Council in the same manner as they reviewed and processed the site plan." At some future time, the Council may wish to amend this ordinance, but in my opinion, as it is now written, any change in "building coverage" or "mass" whether 100 feet or 28 feet cannot be considered a "minor change ". Thank you kindly for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Kent B. Gravelle Gravelle Law Office P.O. Box 24563 Edina, MN 55424 (952) 220 -7085 Fax: (952) 513 -4750 email: kentpravelleggravellelaw.com Web: www.gravel]elaw.com 850.04 Administration and Procedures for Variances and Appeals, Rezoning, Site Plan Review, and Conditional Use Permits. Subd. 3 Site Plan Review. I. Plan Modifications. Minor changes may be authorized by the Planner. Proposed changes to the approved site plan affecting structural types, building coverage, mass, intensity or height, allocation of open space and all other changes which affect the overall design of the property shall be acted on, reviewed and processed by the Commission and Council in the same manner as they reviewed and processed the site plan. Susan Howl rRIBcI VEu JUN 16 2011 From: Bridget.Baird [mailto: Bridget. Baird @target.com] I --- - - - - -- I Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 11:23 AM To: Lynette Biunno; jhovland @krausehovland.com; mbrindle @comcast.net; swensonannl @gmail.com; joshs @cbburnet.com; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; cteaaue @ci.edina.mn.us; ihooaanakker @ci.edina.mn.us. Cc: Bridget.Baird Subject: Shelter /Colonial Water's Project Dear Mayor Hovland, and City Council Members Ann Swenson, Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, and Josh Sprague, Please VOTE THAT THE PROPOSED SHELTER /COLONIAL WATER's PROJECT CHANGES (reducing 39 parking spaces, and reducing common space by 28 feet, since changing the mass) ARE REQUIRED BY ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE A PUBLIC HEARING IN FRONT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL, AND THESE CHANGES ARE MAJOR CHANGES THAT SHOULD REQUIRE THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS. The reasons the changes are major are listed below. 1. The ordinance is clear — any' change in mass should go through the full public hearing process. Period. City Council should enforce the City ordinance. If one reviews Edina Ordinance 850.04, Subd. 3 (1), reproduced below, you will not see how a reduction of the proposed building by 28 feet can be considered a "minor change ". The plain wording of the ordinance states that any proposed change affecting "building coverage" or "mass" "shall be acted on, reviewed and processed by the Commission and Council in the same manner as they reviewed and processed the site plan." 2. This project is major - $30 million and 2 football fields long — and any change to it except maybe interior paint color or carpet color should be fully vetted. The project is not scheduled to break ground until spring 2012, so let's take the time to fully consider what these changes mean, all the possible impacts these changes may have on the project and the surrounding neighborhood and not rush to solely have the City Council vote on without the public hearing process, including a hearing in front of the Planning Commission too. 3. Shrinking Common Areas by 28 feet is Major: We should really know at a detail level what common areas are shrinking. Shrinking of a certain type of common areas could impact traffic, noise, etc. Again, there is nothing small about a $30 million project. "Reduction of common spaces" is really all encompassing. Reducing of commons spaces can have impact on the number of additional trips that may need to be made. More time needs to be taken to understand these impacts. 4. Cutting 39 parking spaces is Major in this Residential Area. a. Parking was raised several times by neighbors as a concern and testimony was offered in the public hearings in 2010, both in the context of the zoning classification and in broader concerns related to the residential neighborhood. Shelter Corporation responded to these concerns by noting how much parking in excess of code they were planning on. Now these parking plans have changed, and neighbors are entitled to fully and completely understand how the parking requirements are determined, the underlying basis for the numbers presented by Shelter Corporation, the assumptions built into the parking requirement numbers (i.e. 1 spot for every 4 residents, but Shelter has stated that they will limit residency to 169. How will this be enforced? b. What about visitors? Shelter Corp. said 10 — 20 people visiting at a time, and what about employees parking? As stated in the development application, 30 to 40 employees will be driving to the location at any given time. How does this impact the parking calculation? c. Parking — the reduction in parking is a concern. They are reducing parking by 40 %, and 4% of areas earmarked for parking reduction; cutting out 39 total parking spots, "36 of the 90 underground parking, of the 73 surface spaces, 3 would be lost ". Just as a reminder, the Developer requested PRD -5 (convalescent and nursing home)due to not being able to qualify for PSR since PSR required more parking. PSR is the zoning classification that all other assisted living places in Edina are zoned. If you recall, the reason PRD- 5 was selected because the Development would not qualify for the PSR zoning classification. The Water's project is not a convalescent and nursing home as defined by code. d. There is no public transportation in this residential area so more vehicles will be brought to this area with parking demands. It appears that Shelter properties are built only in Commercial areas and the commercial areas may be able to absorb the additional parking needs. Every parking space really matters in this residential area. e. Countryside Park is expected to be upgraded, and will draw more people, which means more parking. We already have parking issues around the park. Refer to the recent Police Reports to see the problems. Some person attended a game parked in a homeowner's driveway. This compromises the safety of the homeowner's family if they had a medical emergency, not to mention that people are taking the liberty to park on private property. Once the building is built it will be too late to take a closer look at these questions. What if there isn't enough parking, is the neighborhood now going to have to deal with an above ground parking ramp in their residential neighborhood? g. It would also seem that a change that reduces parking to the extent stated cannot be considered minor. If this project fails, and the building needs to "reinvented" — most likely as a condo or apartment building —the lack of covered parking will be a problem. h. There are pictures attached on Colonial Way, double parking from people attending the Colonial Church Events, the proposed street of the Waters. And on Olinger Blvd and on Hillside Ave, east of Countryside residential streets, showing existing parking concerns in the area. Pictures of Existing Parking Concerns in the Area t III r,* *1'11'r olonial Church Parking Issues More traffic on Hillside Traffic on Olinger Blvd ithin the last Year for their across from Countryside from the baseball game vents. Street Parking on both Park on June 12, 2011 in at Countryside ides of Colonial Way. What will the afternoon. Park June 12,2011 in the afternoon( Just a his look like with the Waters too? Please check the Police note that it is like this Reports for concerns. every weekend and a lot of times during the ee concerns in number 7b week) elow. Please check the Police Reports. 3 5. Is the Parking Underground or Enclosed Parking at Grade Level? Th-e 'Change Request Application states that there were "90 underground parking spaces ". In the Watershed. Application, Shelter states that the parking is enclosed at grade. What is it? That is an entirely different story. What is the true height of this building from the ground of where residential neighbors will see? 6. Public Safety Regarding the Flooding of the Parking Lot: There is one thing that the Water District (WD) does not address in their rules relating to inundation of parking areas. The WD leaves those issues to the City or the facility owner /management. It has been verified by an expert hydrologist with Kevin Bigalke that the WD rules do not regulate the flooding of parking areas. Therefore, the issue would seem most appropriate for the City to address from a public safety standpoint. Part of the parking area (15 or so parking spots) could be inundated with up to two feet of water during the 100 year event (26% chance of occurring in any given year). It was pointed out with the more intense weather, the 26% could be even higher in any given year. Without some adequate precautions or emergency measures in place an individual could be at greater risk of falling in the flood water and not be able to get back up or potentially drive their car off the parking area into deeper water. This is maybe more important with elderly residents. These determinations were provided by an Expert Hydrologist that we can provide to the City. This is not only a public safety issue, when this happens we lose another 15 or so parking in the area. How will the City handle this to make sure that public safety is not an issue? 7. Other Potential City Risks and Questions. It is recommended that a Risk Mitigation Plan be established. a. What happens if there is not enough parking after all? How will the City handle this? There is no other land to build extra lots on. As mentioned above, will the residential neighborhood have to be concerned about high -rise parking ramps? b. Change Church Zoning Ordinance for Parking: As was raised before: The City of Edina is tolerating this zoning classification difference (PRD -5 convalescent nursing home, and PSR (every other assisted living in Edina are coded PSR) because they acknowledge that the zoning code is outdated. They should equally acknowledge that the parking requirements for churches [1 parking stall for every 3 seats in the main sanctuary] is every bit as much out -of -date. That ordinance was created in an era when churches did not regularly sponsor large events and did not often hold concurrent activity events. These multiple events leave the parking inadequate at many of the city's churches. Major events [funerals, et al] already use.the soon- to -be- vacated south parking lot, both sides of Colonial Way and on the streets such as Olinger Boulevard. The overflow can only get worse. We'll predict that the new ordinance will require more than a 1 to 3 ratio of parking stalls to sanctuary seats - perhaps a 1 to 2 ratio can be speculated. Please see the picture above. And when these events happen they also pour into parking on all other nearby streets. c. Another Traffic Study is being requested now by the residents in the area. One where input from the residents "on the ground can participate." It is a year later, and more is known. Let's get an accurate traffic study as many residents personally believe that the traffic will be heavier than anticipated by the developer. Will taxpayers be required to pay for additional infrastructure if needed? Or will the Developer and Church be expected to pay these expenses? Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 1:10 PM To: Cary Teague; Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FK Shelter /Colonial change proposal FR EC E O V �p E JUN 16 2011 Lynette Biunno, Receptionist -- L3, 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 fc Ibiunno(cbci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families ESL Doing Bw9iness From: Burrisjo @aol.com [mailto:Burrisjo @aol.com] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 11:38 AM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: jhovland @krausehovland.com; mbrindle @comcast.net; swensonannl @gmail.com; joshs @bburnet.com; jonibenriettl2 @comcast.net; cteaaue @ci.edina.mn.us; ihooaanakker @ci.edina.mn.us Subject: Shelter /Colonial change proposal City Council: Please vote that the proposed Shelter /Colonial Water's changes are required by ordinance to provide a public hearing in front of the Edina Planning Commission and Edina City Council. These changes are major changes that should require the same public hearing process as the original proposals. Thank you. Joanne O. Burris 5832 Olinger Blvd. Edina MN 55436 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 1:12 PM To: Susan Howl r--EC E WE D Subject: FW: Shelter Corp /Colonial Church Project JUN 16 2011 Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno ci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Larry Kerzner [mailto:lkerznerl @comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 201110:00 PM To: Lynette Biunno; jhovland @krausehovland.com; mbrindle @comcast.net; swensonannl @gmail.com; joshs @cbburnet.com; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; cteaaue @ci.edina.mn.us; ihooaanakker @ci.edina.mn.us Subject: Shelter Corp /Colonial Church Project Dear Mayor Hovland and Edina City Councilors, I write to strongly urge a full public hearing and review by the Edina Planning Commission and City Council of the proposed changes to the previously approved Shelter Corp project. Sincerely, Lawrence J. Kerzner 5828 Jeff Place Edina, MN 55436 an Howl JUN 16 2011 From: burton shacter [mailto:bbshacter @comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 20117:55 AM To: 'edinamail @ci.edina.mn.us'; 'mbrindle @comcast.net'; 'swensonannl @gmail.com'; 'joshs @cbburnet.com'; 'joni ben nettl2 @comcast.net; 'cteaaue @ci.edina.mn.us'; 'and' Subject: Shelter Colonial Church Assisted Living Project I am a retired architect and resident of Edina. I have followed this project from its inception thru Council approval. I wish to say I have never supported the project but for no other reason than it was a misuse of our Zoning Codes to implement a favored development. The approval of the use of PRD -5 which is clearly intended for Convalescent Nursing or Rest Homes does not fit the intended use of this building. It is clearly 80 %apartment building and 20% nursing home style units (care). It was given to the developer because the most logical Zoning category PSD (Senior Citizens Residential) "was too restrictive" requiring significantly more parking not currently provided. Since there is nothing in the approval of the current project that restricts what age the developer may rent to they may rent to anyone of any age they choose if the market demands it. Doing so will put added automobile visits to the site. I am not suggesting that the Council go back to the beginning but I do ask that the parking that was approved is maintained and that no reductions are allowed. It is also clear to me that it is necessary for the Council to initiate an independent review and update our Zoning Codes to meet the needs of today's development projects rather than manipulate the Codes when deem desirable. i Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno 'ent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 1:11 PM o: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Proposed change to Water's Senior Housing Development (2� �n rM REC V E® JUN 16 2011 ` Lynette Biunno, Receptionist r E?1 7 � ` 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Ibiunno(cDci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Christine Henninger [mailto: Christine. Hen ninger @genmills.com] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 11:04 AM To: Lynette Biunno; jhovland @krausehovland.com; 'Joni Bennett'; swensonannl @gmail.com; joshs @cbburnet.com; Mary Brindle Subject: Proposed change to Water's Senior Housing Development Dear Mayor Hovland, Edina City Council Members, I respectfully request that you vote to treat the proposed changes to the Living Waters senior housing development plan as major changes, and require that the proposal be fully vetted via public hearings at the Planning Commission and the City Council. The proposed changes in the development plan will change the total mass of the building, and by city ordinance are required to be treated as major changes. In addition, this project is clearly a major project in the City of Edina. It's been the subject of much discussion and debate, and any change to the existing plan which will impact parking may potentially have far - reaching ramifications, but if the changes are treated as minor, these potential impacts may not be considered or realized until the property is built and fully occupied and then it is too late. Thank you for your consideration. Christine Henninger 5816 Jeff Place Edina 952 - 920 -1931 (h) 763 - 293- 3734(w) Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 8:47 AM To: Cary Teague; Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Shelter Colonial Church Assisted Living Project F5 -F � V �p E JUN 16 2011 -'; Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno0ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: burton shacter [mailto:bbshacter @comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 20117:55 AM To: Lynette Biunno; mbrindle @comcast.net; swensonannl @gmail.com; joshs @cbburnet.com; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; cteaaue @ci.edina.mn.us; 'and' Subject: Shelter Colonial Church Assisted Living Project I am a retired architect and resident of Edina. I have followed this project from its inception thru Council approval. I wish to say I have never supported the project but for no other reason than it was a misuse of our Zoning Codes to implement a favored development. The approval of the use of PRD -5 which is clearly intended for Convalescent Nursing or Rest Homes does not fit the intended use of this building. It is clearly 80 %apartment building and 20% nursing home style units (care). It was given to the developer because the most logical Zoning category PSF (Senior Citizens Residential) "was too restrictive" requiring significantly more parking not currently provided. Since there is nothing in the approval of the current project that restricts what age the developer may rent to they may rent to anyone of any age they choose if the market demands it. Doing so will put added automobile visits to the site. I am not suggesting that the Council go back to the beginning but I do ask that the parking that was approved is maintained and that no reductions are allowed. It is also clear to me that it is necessary for the Council to initiate an independent review and update our Zoning Codes to meet the needs of today's development projects rather than manipulate the Codes when deem desirable. rwil al 41VEf� Susan Howl From: Judith Rodgers [mailto:jbr62 @earthlink.net] `- Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 20118:46 PM To: Lynette Biunno; jhovland @krausehovland.com; mbrindle @comcast.net; swensonannl @gmail.com; joshs @cbburnet.com; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; cteaaue @ci.edina.mn.us Subject: PROPOSED SHELTER /COLONIAL WATERS PROJECT CHANGES Dear Mayor Hovland, and City Council Members Ann Swenson, Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, and Josh Sprague Please VOTE THAT THE PROPOSED SHELTER /COLONIAL WATER'S PROJECT CHANGES (reducing 39 parking spaces, and reducing common space by 28 feet, since changing the mass) ARE REQUIRED BY ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE A PUBLIC HEARING IN FRONT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL, AND THESE CHANGES ARE MAJOR CHANGES THAT SHOULD REQUIRE THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS. The reasons the changes are major are listed below. 1. The ordinance is clear — any change in mass should go through the full public hearing process. Period. City Council should enforce the City ordinance. If one reviews Edina Ordinance 850.04, Subd. 3 (1), reproduced below, you will not see how a reduction of the proposed building by 28 feet can be considered a "minor change ". The plain wording of the ordinance states that any proposed change affecting "building coverage" or "mass" "shall be acted on, reviewed and processed by the Commission and Council in the same manner as they reviewed and processed the site plan." 2. This project is major - $30 million and 2 football fields long — and any change to it except maybe interior paint color or carpet color should be fully vetted. The project is not scheduled to break ground until spring 2012, so let's take the time to fully consider what these changes mean, all the possible impacts these changes may have on the project and the surrounding neighborhood and not rush to solely have the City Council vote on without the public hearing process, including a hearing in front of the Planning Commission too. 3. Shrinking Common Areas by 28 feet is Major: We should really know at a detail level what common areas are shrinking. Shrinking of a certain type of common areas could impact traffic, noise, etc. Again, there is nothing small about a $30 million project. "Reduction of common spaces" is really all encompassing. Reducing of commons spaces can have impact on the number of additional trips that may need to be made. More time needs to be taken to understand these impacts. 4. Cutting 39 parking spaces is Major in this Residential Area. a. Parking was raised several times by neighbors as a concern and testimony was offered in the public hearings in 2010, both in the context of the zoning classification and in broader concerns related to the residential neighborhood. Shelter Corporation responded to these concerns by noting how much parking in excess of code they were planning on. Now these parking plans have changed, and neighbors are entitled to fully and completely understand how the parking requirements are determined, the underlying basis for the numbers presented by Shelter Corporation, the assumptions built into the parking requirement numbers (i.e. 1 spot for every 4 residents, but Shelter has stated that they will limit residency to 169. How will this be enforced? b. What about visitors? Shelter Corp. said 10 — 20 people visiting at a time, and what about employees parking? As stated in the development application, 30 to 40 employees will be driving to the location at any given time. How does this impact the parking calculation? If there are 35 employees working a shift and the next shift comes on there could be 70 cars in the parking lot. If the shift change takes place during visiting hours there could be another 10 -15 visitor cars looking for parking spaces. Does the project really have enough parking? Keep in mind the underground , parking is for the residents. c. Parking —the reduction in parking is a concern. They are reducing parking by 40 %, and 4% of areas earmarked for parking reduction; cutting out 39 total parking spots, "36 of the 90 underground parking, of the 73 surface spaces, 3 would be lost ". Just as a reminder, the Developer requested PRD -5 (convalescent and nursing home)due to not being able to qualify for PSR since PSR required more parking. PSR is the zoning classification that all other assisted living places in Edina are zoned. If you recall, the reason PRD- 5 was selected because the Development would not qualify for the PSR zoning classification. The Water's project is not a convalescent and nursing home as defined by code. d. There is no public transportation in this residential area so more vehicles will be brought to this area with parking demands. It appears that Shelter properties are built only in Commercial areas acid the commercial areas may be able to absorb the additional parking needs. Every parking space really matters in this residential area. e. Countryside Park is expected to be upgraded, and will draw more people, which means more parking. We already have parking issues around the park. Refer to the recent Police Reports to see the problems. Some person attended a game parked in a homeowner's driveway. This compromises the safety of the homeowner's family if they had a medical emergency, not to mention that people are taking the liberty to park on private property. f. Once the building is built it will be too late to take a closer look at these questions. What if there isn't enough parking? Is the neighborhood now going to have to deal with an above ground parking ramp in their residential neighborhood? g. It would also seem that a change that reduces parking to the extent stated cannot be considered minor. If this project fails, and the building needs to "reinvented" — most likely as a condo or apartment building —the lack of covered parking will be a problem. h. There are pictures attached on Colonial Way, double parking from people attending the Colonial Church Events, the proposed street of the Waters. And on Olinger Blvd and on Hillside Ave, east of Countryside residential streets, showing existing parking concerns in the area. i. Pictures of Existing Parking Concerns in the Area 2 5. Is the Parking Underground or Enclosed Parking at Grade Level? The Change Request Application states that there were "90 underground parking spaces ". In the Watershed Application, 3 More traffic on Hillside Traffic on Olinger Blvd olonial Church Parking Issues across from Countryside from the baseball game ithin the last Year for their Street Parking on both Park on June 12, 2011 in at Countryside vents. ides of Colonial Way. What will the afternoon. Park June 12,2011 in is look like with the Waters too? Please check the Police the afternoon( Just a Reports for concerns. note that it is like this ee concerns in number 7b below. every weekend and a lot of times during the week) Please check the Police Reports. 5. Is the Parking Underground or Enclosed Parking at Grade Level? The Change Request Application states that there were "90 underground parking spaces ". In the Watershed Application, 3 Shelter states that the parking is enclosed at grade. What is it? That is an. entire.story . _ I difference? What is the true height of this building from the ground of where residential neighbors will see? 6. Public Safety Regarding the Flooding of the Parking lot: There is one thing that the Water District (WD) does not address in their rules relating to inundation of parking areas. The WD leaves those issues to the City or the facility owner /management. It has been verified by an expert hydrologist with Kevin Bigalke that the WD rules do not regulate the flooding of parking areas. Therefore, the issue would seem most appropriate for the City to address from a public safety standpoint. Part of the parking area (15 or so parking spots) could be inundated with up to two feet of water during the 100 year event (26% chance of occurring in any given year). It was pointed out with the more intense weather; the 26% could be even higher in any given year. Without some adequate precautions or emergency measures in place an individual could be at greater risk of falling in the flood water and not be able to get back up or potentially drive their car off the parking area into deeper water. This is maybe more important with elderly residents. These determinations were provided by an Expert Hydrologist that we can provide to the City. This is not only a public safety issue, when this happens we lose another 15 or so parking in the area. How will the City handle this to make sure that public safety is not an issue? 7. Other Potential City Risks and Questions. It is recommended that at Risk Mitigation Plan be established. a. What happens if there is not enough parking after all? How will the City handle this? There is no other land to build extra lots on. As mentioned above, will the residential neighborhood have to be concerned about high -rise parking ramps? b. Change Church Zoning Ordinance for Parking: As was raised before: The City of Edina is tolerating this zoning classification difference (PRD -5 convalescent nursing home, and PSR (every other assisted living in Edina are coded PSR) because they acknowledge that the zoning code is outdated. They should equally acknowledge that the parking requirements for churches [1 parking stall for every 3 seats in the main sanctuary] is every bit as much out -of -date. That ordinance was created in an era when churches did not regularly sponsor large events and did not often hold concurrent activity events. These multiple events leave the parking inadequate at many of the city's churches. Major events [funerals, et al] already use the soon- to -be- vacated south parking lot, both sides of Colonial Way and on the streets such as Olinger Boulevard. The overflow can only get worse. We'll predict that the new ordinance will require more than a 1 to 3 ratio' of parking stalls to sanctuary seats - perhaps a 1 to 2 ratio' can be speculated. Please see the picture above. And when these events happen they also pour into parking on all other nearby streets. c. Another Traffic Study is being requested now by the residents in the area. One where input from the residents "on the ground can participate." It is a year later, and more is known. Let's get an accurate traffic study as many residents personally believe that the traffic will be heavier than anticipated by the developer. Will taxpayers be required to pay for additional infrastructure if needed? Or will the Developer and Church be expected to pay these expenses? Respectfully, Bill Rodgers 6100 Arbour Lane Edina, MN 55436 952 - 927 -9421 4 �EC;EIVEL� JUN 16 2011 Dear Mayor Hovland, and City Council Members Ann Swenson,, oni enne ary rindle, and Josh Sprague, Please VOTE THAT THE PROPOSED SHELTER/COLONIAL WATER's PROJECT CHANGES (reducing 39 parking spaces, and reducing common space by 28 feet, since changing the mass) ARE REQUIRED BY ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE A PUBLIC HEARING IN FRONT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL, AND THESE CHANGES ARE MAJOR CHANGES THAT SHOULD REQUIRE THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS. The reasons the changes are major are listed below. 1. The ordinance is clear — any change in mass should go through the full public hearing process. Period. City Council should enforce the City ordinance. If one reviews Edina Ordinance 850.04, Subd. 3 (1), reproduced below, you will not see how a reduction of the proposed building by 28 feet can be considered a "minor change ". The plain wording of the ordinance states that any proposed change affecting "building coverage" or "mass" "shall be acted on, reviewed and processed by the Commission and Council in the same manner as they reviewed and processed the site plan." 2. This project is major - $30 million and 2 football fields long — and any change to it except maybe interior paint color or carpet color should be fully vetted. The project is not scheduled to break ground until spring 2012, so let's take the time to fully consider what these changes mean, all the possible impacts these changes may have on the project and the surrounding neighborhood and not rush to solely have the City Council vote on without the public hearing process, including a hearing in front of the Planning Commission too. 3. Shrinking Common Areas by 28 feet is Major: We should really know at a detail level what common areas are shrinking. Shrinking of a certain type of common areas could impact traffic, noise, etc. Again, there is nothing small about a $30 million project. Reduction of common spaces" is really all encompassing. Reducing of commons spaces can have impact on the number of additional trips that may need to be made. More time needs to be taken to understand these impacts. 4. Cutting 39 parking spaces is Major in this Residential Area. a. Parking was raised several times by neighbors as a concern and testimony was offered in the public hearings in 2010, both in the context of the zoning classification and in broader concerns related to the residential neighborhood. Shelter Corporation responded to these concerns by noting how much parking in excess of code they were planning on. Now these parking plans have changed, and neighbors are entitled to fully and completely understand how the parking requirements are determined, the underlying basis for the numbers presented by Shelter Corporation, the assumptions built into the parking requirement numbers (i.e. 1 spot for every 4 residents, but Shelter has stated that they will limit residency to 169. How will this be enforced? b. What about visitors? Shelter Corp. said 10 — 20 people visiting at a time, and what about employees parking? As stated in the development application, 30 to 40 employees will be driving to the location at any given time. How does this impact the parking calculation? c. Parking — the reduction in parking is a concern. They are reducing parking by 40 %,..and 4% of areas earmarked for parking reduction; cutting out 39 total parking spots, "36 of the 90 underground parking, of the 73 surface spaces, 3 would be lost ". Just as a reminder, the Developer requested PRD -5 (convalescent and nursing home)due to not being able to qualify for PSR since PSR required more parking. PSR is the zoning classification that all other assisted living places in Edina are zoned. If you recall, the reason PRD- 5 was selected because the Development would not qualify for the PSR zoning classification. The Water's project is not a convalescent and nursing home as defined by code. d. There is no public transportation in this residential area so more vehicles will be brought to this area with parking demands. It appears that Shelter properties are built only in Commercial areas and the commercial areas may be able to absorb the additional parking needs. Every parking space really matters in this residential area. e. Countryside Park is expected to be upgraded, and will draw more people, which means more parking. We already have parking issues around the park. Refer to the recent Police Reports to see the problems. Some person attended a game parked in a homeowner's driveway. This compromises the safety of the homeowner's family if they had a medical emergency, not to mention that people are taking the liberty to park on private property. f. Once the building is built it will be too late to take a closer look at these questions. What is there isn't enough parking, is the neighborhood now going to have to deal with an above ground parking ramp in their residential neighborhood? g. It would also seem that a change that reduces parking to the extent stated cannot be considered minor. If this project fails, and the building needs to "reinvented" — most likely as a condo or apartment building — the lack of covered parking will be a problem. h. There are pictures attached on Colonial Way, double parking from people attending the Colonial Church Events, the proposed street of the Waters. And on Olinger Blvd and on Hillside Ave, east of Countryside residential streets, showing existing parking concerns in the area. Pictures of Existing Parking Concerns in the Area olonial Church Parking Issues More traffic on Hillside Traffic on Olinger Blvd ithin the last Year for their across from Countryside from the baseball game vents. Street Parking on both Park on June 12, 2011 in the afternoon. at Countryside Park June 12,2011 in ides of Colonial Way. What will the afternoon( Just a is look like with the Waters too? note that it is like this every weekend and a lot ee concerns in number 7b below. Please check the Police of times during the Reports for concerns. week) Please check the Police eports. .. , 5. Is the Parking Underground or Enclosed Parking at Grade Level? The Change Request Application states that there were "90 underground parking spaces ". In the Watershed Application, Shelter states that -the parking is enclosed at grade. Whatis it? That-is an- entire story difference? What is the true height of this building from the ground of where residential neighbors will see? 6. Public,Safety Regarding the Flooding of the Parking Lot: There is, one thing that the Water District (WD) does not address in their rules relating to inundation of parking areas. The WD leaves those issues to the City or the facility owner /management. It has been verified by an expert hydrologist with Kevin Bigalke that the WD rules do not regulate the flooding of parking areas. Therefore, the issue would seem most appropriate for the City to address from a public safety standpoint. Part of the parking area (15 or so parking spots) could be inundated -with up to two feet of water during the 100 year event (26% chance of occurring in any given year). It was pointed out with the more intense weather; the 26% could be even higher in any given year. Without some adequate precautions or emergency measures in place an individual could be at greater risk of falling in the flood water and not be able to get back up or potentially drive their car off the parking area into deeper water. This is maybe more important with elderly residents. These determinations were provided by an Expert Hydrologist that we can.provide to the City. This is not only a public safety issue, when this happens we lose another 15 or so parking in the area. How will the City handle this to make sure that public safety is not an issue? 7. Other Potential City Risks and Questions. It is recommended that at Risk Mitigation Plan be established. a. What happens if there is not enough parking after all? How will the City handle this? There is no other land to build extra lots on. As mentioned above, will the residential neighborhood have to be concerned about high -rise parking ramps? b. Change Church Zoning Ordinance for Parking: As was raised before: The City of Edina is tolerating this zoning classification difference (PRD -5 convalescent nursing home, and PSR (every other assisted living in Edina are coded PSR) because they acknowledge that the zoning code is outdated. They should equally acknowledge that the parking requirements for churches [1 parking stall for every 3 seats in -the main sanctuary] is every bit as much out -of -date. That ordinance was created in an era when churches did not regularly sponsor large events and did not often hold concurrent activity events. These multiple events leave the parking inadequate at many of the city's churches. Major events [funerals, et al] already use the soon- to -be- vacated south parking lot, both sides of Colonial Way and on the streets such as Olinger Boulevard. The overflow can only get worse. We'll predict that the new ordinance will require more than a 1 to 3 ratio' of parking stalls to sanctuary seats - perhaps a 1 to 2 ratio' can be speculated. Please see the picture above. And when these events happen they also pour into parking on all other nearby streets. c. Another Traffic Study is being requested now by the residents in the area. One where input from the residents "on the ground can participate." It is a year later, and more is known. Let's get an accurate traffic study as many residents personally believe that the traffic will be heavier than anticipated by the developer. Will taxpayers be required to pay for additional infrastructure if needed? Or will the Developer and Church be expected to pay these expenses? I respectfully ask that each of you enforce the laws and rules of this great community. I ask you to maintain our property values for all of us, not just businesses. Sincerely, Donna G. Callender 5415 Countryside Road Edina, MN 55436 9529209344 Susan Howl From: Sent: To: Lynette Biunno Thursday, June 16, 2011 8:40 AM Cary Teague; Jackie Hoogenakker IE U M E E y v UB � Cc: Susan Howl Subject: Fw: SUN 16 2011 Hi there, _ - - - - - - This message, due to incorrect spelling of e-mail addresses, is being forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Cary Teague and Jackie Hoogenakker. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: MaryAnn Meyer [mailto:marem @mindspring.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 20119:10 PM To: Lynette Biunno; jhovland @krausehovland.com; mbridie @comcast.net; swensonannl @gmail.com; josh @ebburnet.com; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; cteaaue @ci.edina.mn.us; ihooaanakker @ci.edina.mn.us Subject: Dear Members of the City of Edina that should be looking out for the residents best interests. Please vote that the proposed Shelter /Colonial Water changes are required by ordinance to provide a public hearing in front of a planning commission and city council. This project that seems to be moving foward w/ questionable motives on the part of both Colonial Church and the City of Edina has s000000000 much more negative impact on the neighbors and the residents of edina then it does positive. Take the time to see how this will affect us all! Thank You MaryAnn Meyer Trevor Isaaman 5704 Olinger Blvd. Edina, 55436 James Hovland Edina Mayor Subject: Waters Senior Housing Dear Mayor Hovland, I'm alarmed. June 14, 2011 (952) 922 -7277 RECEIVED JUN 16 2011 It would appear Shelter Corporation is making what it deems to be "minor" changes from the originally plans approved by the Planning Commission and the Edina City Council. The reason for my alarm is because after viewing the changes advocated, is there is absolutely nothing minor about it. Without question this has become a major change. Here's why: • The developer is requesting a significant reduction in the number of parking spaces originally approved. • The number of spaces was originally proposed by the developer in order to meet concerns raised in meetings with residents and planning commission members. • The developer's proposed revision letter is very vague as to actual numbers. For example, the letter states 36 underground parking spaces will be eliminated, however of these 36, 12 are double spaces — does this mean that the real number of spaces being eliminated is 48? Regardless of which figure is correct, the developer is still eliminating between one fourth and one third of the originally agreed upon and approved spaces. Because my house is directly across Countryside Park from the proposed development, I know first- hand that the current lack of adequate parking is already a problem. The development, even with the originally approved spaces, is certain to exacerbate this problem. Furthermore, apart from the parking, the developer's letter is short on specifics as to what the actual changes will entail. The letter states 7 affordable unit will be "created." Are these to be in addition to the original 139 approved units, or is the ratio of memory-care, intensive -care, and assisted living units not being maintained as was originally required? Because the developer's letter is so ambiguous, shouldn't city council determine if these so called "minor" changes will substantially alter the nature of the approved project. Sincerely, Trevor Isaaman c.c. all council members Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 1:18 PM JUN 16 2011 To: Cary Teague; Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Shelter Corp project - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Importance: High Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members, Cary Teague and Jackie Hoogenakker. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 I_ Ibiunno(cDci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Kerzner, Dorothy M [ mailto :dorkerzner @edina.kl2.mn.us] Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:40 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Shelter Corp project Importance: High June 16, 2011 Dear Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council: After meeting with Jay Jenson and Greg Anderson at Colonial Church two weeks ago it is my opinion that the changes proposed by Shelter Corp are not minor and the project deserves a full review by the Planning Commission and the City Council. There are ramifications to the changes being proposed and I feel the City of Edina will be doing a disservice to residents if a review is not completed. Thank you for your consideration. Dorothy Kerzner 5828 Jeff Place Edina 1 ow e cn H�c� �y J Be REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VII. -2 DEBRA MANGEN F-1 Action From: CITY CLERK Discussion �71 Information Date: JUNE 21, 2011 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED AFTER PACKETS INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received after the packets were delivered to you. Susan Howl RECEW JUN 1 1 2011 From: Nancy Kleiber <nancykleiber @comcast.net> �' --- _ Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 10:08PM To: Susan Howl; jhovland @krausehovland com;_mbrindle@ comcast .net;_swensonannl @gmail.com; joshs @cbburnet.com; jonibennett12@ comcast. net; cteaaue @ci.edina.mn.us; 'and' Subject: SHELTER/COLONIAL WATER's PROJECT CHANGES Dear Mayor Hovland, and City Council Members Ann Swenson, Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, and Josh Sprague, Please. VOTE THAT THE PROPOSED SHELTER /COLONIAL WATER's PROJECT CHANGES (reducing 39 parking spaces, and reducing common space by 28 feet, since changing the mass) ARE. REQUIREDIBY ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE A PUBLIC HEARING IN FRONT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL, AND THESE CHANGES ARE MAJOR CHANGES THAT SHOULD REQUIRE THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS! The reasons the, changes are;major are listed below. 1. The!.ordinance is clear — any change in mass should go through the full public hearing ,process. Period. City Council should enforce the City ordinance. If one reviews,Edina Ordinance 850.04, Subd. 3 (1), reproduced below, you will not see how a reduction of the proposed building by 28 feet can be.considered a "minor change ". The plain wording of the ordinance states that any proposed change affecting "building coverage" or "mass" "shall be acted on, reviewed and processed by'the Commission and Council in the same manner as they reviewed and processed the site plan." 2. This project is major - $30 million and 2 football fields long — and any change to it except maybe interior paint color or.carpet color should be fully vetted. The project is not scheduled to break ground until spring 2012, so let's take the time to fully consider what these changes mean, all the possible.im pacts .these changes may have on the project and the surrounding neighborhood and not rush to solely have the City Council vote on without the public hearing process, including :a hearing in front of the Planning Commission too. K, Shrinking Common Areas by 28 feet is Major: We should really know at a detail level what common areas 'areshrinking. Shrinking of a certain type of common areas could impact traffic, noise, etc. Again, there is nothing small about a $30 million project. "Reduction of common spaces" is really all encompassing. Reducing of commons spaces can have impact on the number of additional trips that may need to be made. More time needs to be taken to understand these impacts. 4. Cutting, 39. parking spaces is Major in this Residential Area. Parking was raised several times by neighbors as a concern and testimony was offered in the public hearings in 2010, both in the context of the zoning classification and in broader concerns related to the residential neighborhood. Shelter Corporation responded to these concerns by noting how Much parking in excess of code they were planning on.. Now these parking plans have changed, and neighbors are entitled to fully and completely understand how the parking requirements are determined, the underlying basis for the numbers presented by Shelter Corporation, the assumptions built into the parking requirement numbers (i.e. 1 spot for every 4 residents, but Shelter has stated that they will limit residency to 169. How will this be enforced? b. What about visitors? Shelter Corp. said 10 — 20 people visiting at a time, and what about employees parking? As stated in the development application, 30 to 40 employees will be driving to the location at any given time. How does this impact the parking calculation? c. Parking — the reduction in parking is a concern. They are reducing parking by 40 %, and 4% of areas earmarked for parking reduction; cutting out 39 total parking spots, "36 of the 90 underground parking, of the 73 surface spaces, 3 would be lost ". Just as a reminder, the Developer requested PRD -5 (convalescent and nursing home)due to not being able to qualify for PSR since PSR required more parking. PSR is the zoning classification that all other assisted living places in Edina are zoned. If you recall, the reason PRD- 5 was selected because the Development would not qualify for the PSR zoning classification. The Water's project is not a convalescent and nursing home as defined by code. d. There is no public transportation in this residential area so more vehicles will be brought to this area with parking demands. It appears that Shelter properties are built only in Commercial areas and the commercial areas may be able to absorb the additional parking needs. Every parking space really matters in this residential area. e. Countryside Park is expected to be upgraded, and will draw more people, which means more parking.- We already have parking issues around the park. Refer to the recent Police Reports to see the problems. Some person attended a game parked in a homeowner's driveway. This compromises the safety of the homeowner's family if they had a medical emergency, not to mention that people are taking the liberty to park on private property. f. Once the building is built it will be too late to take a closer look at these questions. What is there isn't enough parking, is the neighborhood now going to have to deal with an above ground parking ramp in their residential neighborhood? g. It would also seem that a change that reduces parking to the extent stated cannot be considered minor. If this project fails, and the building needs to "reinvented" — most likely as a condo or apartment building — the lack of covered parking will be a problem. h. There are pictures attached on Colonial Way, double parking from people attending the Colonial Church Events, the proposed street of the Waters. And on Olinger Blvd and on Hillside Ave, east of Countryside residential streets, showing existing parking concerns in the area. i. Pictures of Existing Parking Concerns in the Area 2 5 rA olonial Church Parking Issues More traffic on Hillside Traffic on Olinger Blvd ithin the last Year for their across from Countryside from the baseball game vents. Street Parking on both Park on June 12, 2011 in at Countryside ides of Colonial Way. What will the afternoon. Park June 12,2011 in his look like with the Waters too? the afternoon( Just a Please check the Police note that it is like this Reports for concerns. every weekend and a lot of times during the ee concerns in number 7b week) elow. Please check the Police Reports. 3 5. Is the Parking Underground or Enclosed Parking at Grade Level? The Change Request Application states that there were "90 underground parking spaces ". In the Watershed Application, Shelter states that the parking is enclosed at grade. What is it? That is an entire story difference? What is the true height of this building from the ground of where residential neighbors will see? 6. Public Safety Regarding the Flooding of the Parking Lot: There is one thing that the Water District (WD) does not address in their rules relating to inundation of parking areas. The WD leaves those issues to the City or the facility owner /management. It has been verified by an expert hydrologist with Kevin Bigalke that the WD rules do not regulate the flooding of parking areas. Therefore, the issue would seem most appropriate for the City to address from a public safety standpoint. Part of the parking area (15 or so parking spots) could be inundated with up to two feet of water during the 100 year event (26% chance of occurring in any given year). It was pointed out with the more intense weather; the 26% could be even higher in any given year. Without some adequate precautions or emergency measures in place an individual could be at greater risk of falling in the flood water and not be able to get back up or potentially drive their car off the parking area into deeper water. This is maybe more important with elderly residents. These determinations were provided by an Expert Hydrologist that we can provide to the City. This is not only a public safety issue, when this happens we lose another 15 or so parking in the area. How will the City handle this to make sure that public safety is not an issue? 7. Other Potential City Risks and Questions. It is recommended that a Risk Mitigation Plan be established. a. What happens if there is not enough parking after all? How will the City handle this? There is no other land to build extra lots on. As mentioned above, will the residential neighborhood have to be concerned about high -rise parking ramps? b. Change Church Zoning Ordinance for Parking: As was raised before: The City of Edina is tolerating this zoning classification difference (PRD -5 convalescent nursing home, and PSR (every other assisted living in Edina are coded PSR) because they acknowledge that the zoning code is outdated. They should equally acknowledge that the parking requirements for churches [1 parking stall for every 3 seats in the main sanctuary] is every bit as much out -of -date. That ordinance was created in an era when churches did not regularly sponsor large events and did not often hold concurrent activity events. These multiple events leave the parking inadequate at many of the city's churches. Major events [funerals, et al] already use the soon- to -be- vacated south parking lot, both sides of Colonial Way and on the streets such as Olinger Boulevard. The overflow can only get worse. We'll predict that the new ordinance will require more than a 1 to 3 ratio' of parking stalls to sanctuary seats - perhaps a 1 to 2 ratio' can be speculated. Please see the picture above. And when these events happen they also pour into parking on all other nearby streets. c. Another Traffic Study is being requested now by the residents in the area. One where input from the residents "on the ground can participate." It is a year later, and more is known. Let's get an accurate traffic study as many residents personally believe that the traffic will be heavier than anticipated by the developer. Will taxpayers be required to pay for additional infrastructure if needed? Or will the Developer and Church be expected to pay these expenses? Respectfully, Nancy Kleiber 5112 Skyline Drive Edina, MN 55436 952 920 -7607 5 F'�L �:LIVEI� Susan Howl From: sandy maloney <tsiservicesllc @hotmail.com> I Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2011 10:48 AM — — — —'' ' — — — — — — — — To: Susan Howl; jhovland @krausehovland.com; mbrindle @comcast.net; swensonannl @gmail.com; jonibennettiz @comcast.net; joshs @cbburnet.com; cteaaue @ci.edina.mn.us; ihooaanakker @ci.edina.mn.us Subject: Colonial Water's Changes Dear Major Hovland and City Council Members: Ann Swenson, Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle and Josh Sprague Please Vote that the proposed shelter Colonial Water's project changes ( reducing 39 parking spaces, and reducing commons spaces by 28 ft. since changing the mass) are required by ordinance to provide a public hearing in front of the Planning Commission and City Council, and these changes are major changes that should require the Pubic Hearing Process. I personally think that this project is not in the best interest of the Quiet Community that has been zoned for many years. The price of homes in this area has been considered for all the positive aspects of the Community, a quiet safe place to raise a family, low slow traffic a family oriented. Paying high taxes to live in a private zone,away from the traffic and noise that people bring when there is an appartment building vs. family homes. This Residential area is turning into a Commercial area leaving little Green to the Community for our Children. Having other vacant areas or empty land around other places where they could build another building. There is already 2 churches, the Fire Department, and the park that brings extra traffic to this area. Not fair for the Family Homes in the area. As it is , it is hard to turn into Tracy Ave. from Cross Town (62) when there is Church time, I could just imagine when there could be a building getting more traffic. Thank you for your consideration on this matter Kind regards Sandy Maloney 952 - 797 -6049 Susan Howl From: Sent: To: Subject: Dear City Officials, Mary McDonald <marymarymcmc @yahoo.com> Saturday, June 18,'2011 3:31 PM Susan Howl; jhovland @krausehovland.com; mbrindle @comcast.net;.swen @comcast.net; joshs@cbburnet.com; Cary Teague; Jackie Hoogenakker Changes to Shelter Corporation plans Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church recently made changes to their plans for a building in the Countryside neighborhood. I understand the City is considering allowing these changes without a Public Hearing. I am adamantly opposed to that course of action. Our household was involved in the dispute with Interlachen Country Club over its plans for maintenance facilities. In that effort we were told that small changes could be made to the plans without a Public`Heairng - changes such as different doorknobs or a different style of window or a different depth of color. The changes that Shelter Corporation and Colonial Church are proposing come nowhere near meeting the "small" criterion. Considering the great number of Edina residents who are concerned about this issue, it seems it would be wiser to hold Public Hearings so those residents can have input into whether the changes are a good idea or not. If indeed the changes are minor, the residents' contributions to the public discourse would also be minor and not time - consuming because there would be little to discuss if the changes truly are insignificant. At one point, when Interlachen made changes to its plans, we were told that those changes were minor and that we would not be allowed to offer our opinions on them in a public forum. This made us particularly sensitive to the rights of citizens to have input into the approval process for construction that affects their homes. Thus, when a few city officials, as experienced as they are, proclaim changes to be "small ", but a much, much greater number of residents believe that they may not be "small" at all, the City would-be smart to at least give those residents a chance to speak and offer evidence. Thank you. Mary McDonald 1 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno W ECEWED Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 9:10 AM To: Cary Teague JUN 2 1 2011 Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Waters Project Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Cary Teague. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno @ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: H Havir [mailto:hhavir @nbs- inc.com] Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 11:04 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Waters Project To: Mayor and City Council From: Harvey & Mary Havir 6108 Tracy Ave Re: Request for Public Hearing Date: June 20, 2011 We are requesting that this is not a minor change in plan. The major reason being the reduction in parking places. There was great concern that the parking regulations were not adequate in the original proposal and they are now proposing to significantly reduce this. We have great concern that the Waters will be using the parking lot on the West side of the park as on a regular basis. This is the lot that the Park will be using when the picnic shelter that is completed and there will be inadequate availability. There needs to be a Public Hearing on at least this situation. Thank you. 1 From: Rick Conkey [mailto:rick.conkey @ yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 10:,45 PM To: Lynette Biunno; jhovland @krausehovland.com; mbrindle @comcast.net; swensonanhl @gmail.com; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; joshs @cbburnet.com; Cary Teague; Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Process For Colonial /Waters. Project Changes Mayor. Hovland. and City Council Members Ann Swenson, Joni Bennett, Mary" Brindle, Josh Sprague: Please VOTE THAT THE PROPOSED SHELTER /COLONIAL WATER'S PROJECT CHANGES (reducing 39 parking spaces, and reducing common space by 28 feet, since changing the mass) ARE REQUIRED BY ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE A PUBLIC HEARING IN FRONT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL, AND THESE CHANGES ARE MAJOR CHANGES THAT REQUIRE THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS. The ordinance' is clear — any change in mass is required to go through the full public hearing process. City Council is required to enforce the City ordinance. The plain wording of the ordinance states that any prop`osed'change affecting "building coverage" or "mass" "shall be acted on, reviewed and processed by the Commission and Council in the same manner as they reviewed and processed the site Plan." To act in any way other than to require due process and review by Planning Commission and City Council.would be a misinterpretation of the ordinance and subject to challenge. I fully expect the council will uphold its responsibility and support Edina Ordinance 850.04, Subd. 3 (1) requiring Planning Commission and City Council review of the proposed Colonial /Waters Project changes. Thank you. Respectfully, Richard Conkey i Susan Howl I R Elm E 11 V E D, JUN 2 1 2F ►1 From: julie appel [mailto:julie_appel @hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 10:16 AM To: Lynette Biunno; jhovland @krausehovland.com; mbrindle @comcast.net; swensonannl @gmail.com; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; joshs @cbburnet.com; Cary Teague; Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Waters Senior Housing Dear Council Members: The proposed changes to the plans for the Waters Senior Housing project are major changes and are significant enough to warrant a formal amendment to the approved plans, including formal review and public hearing at the Planning Commission and'City Council. Thank you for your kind attention to this matter. Sincerely, Julie Appel Susan Howl From: Hans Koenig <hkoenig @blakeschool.org> Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 10:09 PM JUN 2 1 2011 To: Susan Howl; jhovland @krausehovland.com; mb ring le @comcast.net; swensonannl@ mail:com;- jonibennettl2 -- - @comcast.net; joshs @cbburret.com; cteaaue @ci.edina.mn.us; Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Fwd: Colonial Waters Project �'-'- '�� °`� Dear Mayor Hovland, and City Council Members Ann Swenson, Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, and Josh Sprague, Please VOTE THAT THE PROPOSED SHELTER /COLONIAL WATER's PROJECT CHANGES (reducing 39 parking spaces, and reducing common space by 28 feet, since changing the mass) ARE REQUIRED BY ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE A PUBLIC HEARING IN FRONT,OF-THE. PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL, AND THESE CHANGES ARE MAJOR CHANGES THAT SHOULD REQUIRE THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS. The reasons the changes are major are listed below. 1. Any change of this magnitude is a "big deal" or a "major change ". Any change in mass should go through the full public hearing process: and processed by the Commission and Council in the same manner as they reviewed and processed the site plan. 2. This project is major = $30 million and 2 football fields long — and any change to it except maybe interior paint color or carpet color should be fully vetted. The project is not scheduled to break ground until spring 2012, so let's take the time to fully consider what these changes mean, all the possible impacts these changes may have on the project and the surrounding neighborhood and not rush to solely have the City Council vote on without the public hearing process, including a hearing in.front of the Planning Commission.. 3. Shrinking Common Areas by 28 feet is Major "change: We should really know at a detailed level what common areas are shrinking. Shrinking of a certain type of common areas could impact traffic, noise, etc. Again, there is nothing small about a $30 million project. 4. Cutting 39 parking spaces is Major change in this residential area. I live within 1,000 feet of the project and the congestion caused by street parking during baseball games already makes it a hazard for those who live there and for traffic passing through right now. a. The parking issue was raised several times by neighbors as a concern and testimony was offered in the public hearings in 2010, both in the context of the zoning classification and in broader concerns related to the residential neighborhood. Shelter Corporation responded to these concerns by noting how much parking in excess of code they vere planning on. Now these parking plans have changed, and neighbors are entitled to -fully and completely understand how the parking requirements are determined. i b. Future visitors at the Waters present a major issue as well. Shelter Corp. said 10 — 20 people would be visiting at a time. Employees parking adds significant numbers of parked vehicles to the total. As stated in the development application, 30 to 40 employees will be driving to the location at any given time. How does this impact the parking calculation? C. The reduction in parking is a concern. They are reducing parking by 40 %, and 4% of areas earmarked for parking reduction; cutting out 39 total parking spots, "36 of the 90 underground parking, of the 73 surface spaces, 3 would be lost ". d. There is no public transportation in this residential area. Consequently more vehicles will be brought to this area with parking demands. It appears that other Shelter properties are built only in Commercial areas and the commercial areas may be able to absorb the additional parking needs. Every parking space really matters in this residential area. e. Countryside Park is expected to be upgraded and will draw more people than currently. This means that more parking space will be needed.. We already have parking issues around the park. Refer to the recent Police Reports to see the problems. f. Once the building is built it will be too late to take a closer look at these questions. What parking space is there now is insufficient. Will the neighborhood have to deal with an above ground parking ramp in their residential neighborhood after the Waters project has been completed? Thank you for your consideration of my request. Sincerely, Hans J. Koenig 6209 Crest Lane Edina, MN 55436 952 - 926 -9226 Susan Howl From:,jhoward6l2 @comcast.net [mailto:jhoward612 @comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, June'21, 2011 11:30 AM To: Lynette Biunno; jhovland @krausehovland.com; mbrindle @comcast.net; swensonannl @gmail.com; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; joshs @cbburnet.com; Cary Teague; Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Waters Project Dear Mayor Hovland, and City Council Members Ann Swenson, Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle,. and Josh Sprague, We live at 5812 W 61st Street in Edina. I, John Howard (Chip), my wife, - :Susan Clark, son, John Howard (23), and I are opposed to the project and hence the project changes. Please VOTE THAT THE PROPOSED SHELTER/COLONIAL WATER's PROJECT CHANGES (reducing 39 parking spaces, and reducing common space by 28 feet, since changing the mass) ARE REQUIRED BY ORDINANCE TO PROVIDE A PUBLIC HEARING IN FRONT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL, AND THESE CHANGES ARE MAJOR CHANGES THAT SHOULD REQUIRE THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS. The reasons the changes are major are listed below. y 1. The ordinance is, clear - any change in mass should go through the full public hearing process. Period. City Council should enforce the City ordinance. If one reviews Edina Ordinance 850.04, Subd. 3 (1), reproduced below, you will not see how a reduction of the proposed building by 28 feet can be considered a "minor change ". The plain wording of the ordinance states that any proposed change affecting . "building coverage" or "mass" "shall be acted on, reviewed and processed by the Commission and Council -in the same manner as they reviewed and processed the site plan." 2. This project is major - $30 million and 2 football fields long — and any change to it except maybe interior paint color or carpet color should be fully vetted. The project is not scheduled to break ground until spring 2012, so let's take the time to fully consider what these changes mean, all the possible impacts these changes may have on the project and the surrounding neighborhood and not rush to solely have the City Council vote on without the public hearing process, including a hearing in front of the Planning Commission too. 3. Shrinking Common Areas by 28 feet is Major: We should really know at a detail level what common areas are shrinking. Shrinking of a certain type of common areas could impact traffic, noise, etc. Again, there is nothing small about a $30 million project. "Reduction of common spaces" is really all encompassing. Reducing of commons spaces can have impact on the number of additional trips that may need to be made. More time needs to be taken to understand these impacts. 4. Cutting 39 parking spaces is Major in this Residential Area. a. Parking was raised several times by neighbors as a concern and testimony was offered in the public hearings in 2010, both in the context of the zoning classification and in broader concerns related to the residential neighborhood. Shelter Corporation responded to these concerns by noting how much parking in excess of code they were planning on. Now these parking plans have changed, and neighbors are entitled to fully and completely understand how the parking requirements are determined, the underlying basis for the numbers presented by Shelter Corporation, the assumptions built into the parking requirement numbers (i.e. 1 spot for every 4 residents, but Shelter has stated that they will limit residency to 169. How will this be enforced? b. What about visitors? Shelter Corp. said 10 — 20 people visiting at a time, and what about employees parking? As stated in the development application, 30 to 40 employees will be driving to the location at any given time. How does this impact the parking calculation? c. Parking — the reduction in parking is a concern. They are reducing parking by 40 %, and 4% of areas earmarked for parking reduction; cutting out 39 total parking spots, "36 of the 90 underground parking, of the 73 surface spaces, 3 would be lost ". Just as a reminder, the Developer requested PRD -5 (convalescent and nursing home)due to not being able to qualify for PSR since PSR required more parking. PSR is the zoning classification that all other assisted living places in Edina are zoned. If you recall, the reason PRD- 5 was selected because the Development would not qualify for the PSR zoning classification. The Water's project is not a convalescent and nursing home as defined by code. d. There is no public transportation in this residential area so more vehicles will be brought to this area with parking demands. It appears that Shelter properties are built only in Commercial areas and the commercial areas may be able to absorb the additional parking needs. Every parking space really matters in this residential area. e. Countryside Park is expected to be upgraded, and will draw more people, which means more parking. We already have parking issues around the park. Refer to the recent Police Reports to see the problems. Some person attended a game parked in a homeowner's driveway. This compromises the safety of the homeowner's family if they had a medical emergency, not to mention that people are taking the liberty to park on private property. f. Once the building is built it will be too late to take a closer look at these questions. What is there isn't enough parking, is the neighborhood now going to have to deal with an above ground parking ramp in their residential neighborhood? olonial Church Parking Issues More traffic on Hillside Traffic on Olinger ithin the last Year for their across from Blvd from the baseball vents. Street Parking on both Countryside Park on game at Countryside` ides of Colonial Way. --What - - June 12, 201 -1 -in the -. -Park June -12 -2011 in afternoon. the afternoon( Just a ill this look like with the note that it is like this aters too? every weekend and a lot of times during the ee concerns in number 7b Please check the Police week) elow. Reports for concerns. Please check the Police Reports. 5., Is the Parking Underground or Enclosed Parking at Grade Level? The Change Request Application states that there were "90 underground parking spaces ". In the Watershed Application, Shelter states that the parking,is enclosed at grade. What is it? That is an entire story difference? What is the true height of this building from the ground of where residential neighbors will see? 6. Public Safety Regarding the Flooding of the Parking Lot: There is one thing .that. the Water District (WD) does not address in their rules relating to inundation of parking areas. The WD leaves those issues to the. City or the facility owner /management. It has been verified by an expert hydrologist with Kevin Bigalke that the WD rules do not regulate the flooding of parking areas. Therefore, the issue would seem most appropriate for the City to address from a public safety standpoint. Part of the parking, area (15 or so parking spots) could be inundated with up to two feet of water during the 100 year event (26% chance of occurring: in any given year). It Was pointed out with the more intense weather; the 26% could be even higher in any given year. Without some.adequate precautions or emergency measures in place an individual could beat greater risk.of falling in the flood water and not be able to get back up or potentially drive their car off the parking area into deeper water. This is maybe more important with elderly residents. These determinations were provided by an Expert Hydrologist that we can provide to the City. This is not only a public safety issue, when this happens we lose another 15 or so parking in the area. How will the City handle this to make sure that public safety is not an issue? 7. Other Potential City Risks and Questions. It is recommended that a Risk Mitigation Plan be established. 4 a. What happens if there is not enough parking after all? How will the City handle this? There is no other land to build extra lots on. As mentioned above, will the residential neighborhood have to be concerned about high -rise parking ramps? b. Change Church Zoning Ordinance for Parking: As was raised before: The City of Edina is tolerating this zoning classification difference (PRD -5 convalescent nursing home, and PSR (every other assisted living in Edina are coded PSR) because they acknowledge that the zoning code is outdated. They should equally acknowledge that the parking requirements for churches [1 parking stall for every 3 seats in the main sanctuary] is every bit as much out -of -date. That ordinance was created in an era when churches did not regularly sponsor large events and did not often hold concurrent activity events. These multiple events leave the parking inadequate at many of the city's churches. Major events [funerals, et al] already use the soon- to -be- vacated south parking lot, both sides of Colonial Way and on the streets such as Olinger Boulevard. The overflow can only get worse. We'll predict that the new ordinance will require more than a 1 to 3 ratio' of parking stalls to sanctuary seats - perhaps a 1 to 2 ratio' can be speculated. Please see the picture above. And when these events happen they also pour into parking on all other nearby streets. c. Another Traffic Study is being requested now by the residents in the area. One where input from the residents "on the ground can participate." It is a year later, and more is known. Let's get an accurate traffic study as many residents personally believe that the traffic will be heavier than anticipated by the developer. Will taxpayers be required to pay for additional infrastructure if needed? Or will the Developer and Church be expected to pay these expenses? RRECENED Susan Howl From: Ann Compton.[mailto:anncompton @ comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 20116:15 AM To: Lynette Biunno; jhovland @krausehovland.com; mbrindle @comcast.net; swensonanni @gmail.com; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Sprague, Joshua S; Cary Teague; Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Dear Mayor Hovland, and City Council Members Ann Swenson, Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, and Josh Sprague, Please VOTE THAT THE PROPOSED SHELTER/COLONIAL WATER's PROJECT CHANGES (reducing 39 parking spaces, and reducing common space by 28 feet, since changing the mass) ARE REQUIRED BY ORDINANCE.TO PROVIDE A PUBLIC HEARING IN FRONT OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL, AND THESE CHANGES ARE MAJOR.CHANGES THAT SHOULD REQUIRE THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS. The reasons the'changes are major are listed below. l 1. The ordinance is clear — any change in mass should go through the full public hearing `process. Period. City Council should enforce the City ordinance. If one reviews Edina Ordinance 850.04, Subd. 3 (1), reproduced below, you will not see how a reduction of the proposed':building by 28 feet can be considered a "minor change ". The plain wording of the ordinance states that any proposed change affecting "building coverage" or "mass" "shall be acted on, reviewed and processed by the Commission and Council in the same manner as they reviewed and processed the site plan." 2. This project is major - $30 million and 2 football fields long — and any change to it except maybe interior paint color..or carpet color should be fully vetted. The project is not scheduled to break ground until, spring 2012, so let's take the time to fully consider what these changes mean, all the possible impacts these changes may have on the project and the surrounding neighborhood and not rush to solely have the City Council vote on without the public hearing process, including a hearing in front of the Planning Commission too. i 3. Shrinking Common Areas by 28 feet is Major: We should really know at a detail level what common areas are shrinking. Shrinking of a certain type of common areas could impact traffic, noise, etc. Again, there is nothing small about a $30 million project. " Reduction of common spaces" is really all encompassing. Reducing of commons spaces can have impact on the number of additional trips that may need to be made. More time needs to be taken to understand these impacts. 4. Cutting 39 parking spaces is Major in this Residential Area. a. Parking was raised several times by neighbors as a concern and testimony was offered in the public hearings in 2010, both in the context of the zoning classification and in broader concerns related to the residential neighborhood. Shelter Corporation responded to these concerns by noting how much parking in excess of code they were planning on. Now these parking plans have changed, and neighbors are entitled to fully and completely understand how the parking requirements are determined, the underlying basis for the numbers presented by Shelter Corporation, the assumptions built into the parking requirement numbers (i.e. 1 spot for every 4 residents, but Shelter has stated that they will limit residency to 169. How will this be enforced? b. What about visitors? Shelter Corp. said 10 — 20 people visiting at a time, and what about employees parking? As stated in the development application, 30 to 40 employees will be driving to the location at any given time. How does this impact the parking calculation? z c. Parking — the reduction in parking is a concern. They are reducing parking by 40 %, and 4% of areas earmarked for parking reduction; cutting out 39 total parking spots, "36 of the 90 underground parking, of the 73. surface spaces, 3 would be lost ". Just as a reminder, the Developer requested PRD -5 (convalescent and nursing home)due to not being able, to qualify for PSR since PSR required more parking. PSR is the zoning classification that all other assisted living places in Edina are zoned. If you recall, the reason PRD -. 5 was selected because the Development would not qualify for the PSR zoning classification. The Water's project is not a convalescent and nursing home as defined by code. d. There is no public transportation in this residential area so more vehicles will be brought to this area with parking demands. It appears that Shelter properties. are built only in Commercial areas and the commercial areas may be able to absorb the additional parking needs. Every parking space really matters in this residential area. e. Countryside Park is expected to be upgraded, and will draw more people, which means more parking. We already have parking issues around the park. Refer to the recent Police Reports to see the problems. Some person attended a game parked in a homeowner's driveway. This compromises the safety of the homeowner's family if they had a medical emergency, not to mention that people are taking the liberty to,park on private property. f. Once the building is built it will be too late to take a closer look at these questions. What is there, isn't enough parking, is the neighborhood now going to have to deal with an above ground parking ramp in their residential. neighborhood? g. It would also seem that a change that reduces parking to the extent stated cannot be considered minor. If this project fails, and the building needs to "reinvented" — 3. most likely as a condo or apartment building — the lack of covered parking will be a problem. h. There are pictures attached on Colonial Way, double parking from people attending the Colonial Church Events, the proposed street of the Waters. And on Olinger Blvd and on Hillside Ave, east of Countryside residential streets, showing existing parking concerns in the area. Pictures of Existing Parking Concerns in the Area 2 CEOVE� �E Susan Howl From: Lynn Hagedorn <hagedornla @aol.com> JUN 2. 1 2011 Sent: Sunday,.June 19, 2011 10:57 PM To: Susan Howl _ Subject: Walters construction The neighbors and Edina citizens obviously feel strongly about this development - please support them. Lynn Hagedorn 1 Susan Howl From: Todd Fryzek <tfryzek @sehinc.com> u u L�— %',W L-. �- Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 3:52 PM JUN `� 2011 To: Susan Howl Subject: to Joni, Jim & Mary re/ Vinyl Chloride issue with water wells Hi All- Since I know all three of you, I thought I would send an all inclusive email. If any of the three of you want /need third party review, comments or information on the environmental issues /concerns associated with the pending air stripper construction, operation, or maintenance for dealing with vinyl chloride, I'm willing to volunteer in anyway you may need help. I'm not sure if you know or not, but I have been doing environmental engineering for over 20 years. Some relevant projects include: 1. Expert reviews of existing and proposed remediation systems in Germany which realized over $45 million in savings for the US Army. 2. Management of operation and maintenance of remediation systems at Hill Air Force Base, Utah including several air strippers for removing chlorinated solvents, including vinyl chloride. 3. Design and construction of a breakpoint chlorination system to address elevated nitrates and chlorinated solvents in drinking water in Livorno, Italy. Since I live in Morningside of course this issue does not directly affect my water supply, but once again if I can help, let me know! Regards, Todd Todd Fryzek Sr. Project Manager 651.490.2174 direct 651.470.0523 cell 651.490.2150 fax Short Elliott Hendrickson (SEH) tfrvzek @sehinc.com www.sehinc.com Susan Howl From: mark lovmo <mlovmo @hotmail.com> Sent: Saturday, June 18, 20119:09 AM u� 2 20�� To: Susan Howl J Subject: A/C Chiller at York Gardens Dear City of Edina, I am writing to you today to ,complain about the Air Conditioner at the York Gardens facility on Edinborough Way. Our home is on the first floor, facing the-chiller. Since it's been in place, noise of the chiller and transformer has resulted in restless nights for us. You see,, our bedroom window is exactly 25 yards away from this jet- engine roar.. I have previously written my, concerns and questions to -the City on this issue, but I have _suspended my complaint about it until now. I was willing to wait for York Gardens to get things working right, as a City employee explained to me that York Gardens will bring a geo- thermal system online "sometime around the first week of June" when a vital component gets installed. Well, it is now the third week of June, and many restless nights later, and the chiller is STILL just as noisy, and running even MORE OFTEN than before! Last night (6/18) York Gardens ran the chiller constantly, well outside the stated "6 minutes in an hour "! From what I understand, this is against city noise ordinances. I would hope that the City of Edina sees this as a problem. From what I can tell, the City doesn't, as the City has not sanctioned York Gardens nor has it ordered any corrective action. My question: Is the City of Edina going to DO something about this? Even if York Gardens eventually does fix this noise and appearance problem, isn't the City of Edina going to ENFORCE its own rules in the meantime? Isn't York Gardens going to receive a fine for operating this chiller against ordinance? After all of this, are you SERIOUSLY considering their variance request? It seems that York Gardens is not too concerned about the City of Edina because as Mayor Jim Hovland pointed out in the June 7th City Council meeting, seventy percent of their senior care facility is already filled with residents, so they can't shut off the chiller... basically York Gardens is using its residents as an excuse to, run this chiller whenever they want! I'm glad the City is concerned about the comfort of the senior residents of York Gardens. I hate to be so selfish; but"this really begs the question: WHAT ABOUT USP? This time, I would like a response to'my email, please. Even if it is just a perfunctory, "yeah we. heard you, now leave us alone" response. Kind Regards, Mark Lovmo Edina Resident, VOTER in local elections, and taxpayer. Susan Howl To: City Council Members Subject: FW: Alley Drainage Issue Attachments: image.gif; IMAG0004.jpg; IMAG0003.jpg RIMMED JUN 2 1 2011 Susan Howl, Human Services Coordinator 952- 826 -0403 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0390 showl(a)ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Fanidies & Doing Business From: dad [ mailto:adrianolson @comcast.net] Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 10:20 AM To: Susan Howl Subject: Alley Drainage Issue To Whom it concern: Now that I have your attention, how about fixing this drainage issue in the alley between Abbott and Zenith (59th 1/2). When can we see some changes? Thank you for time. Sincerely- 5933 Abbott Ave S. Concerned Resident Please forward to the approiate contact. FREE Animations for your email - by IncrediMail! Click Here! i RECEP ED n Howl From: Kaye <kbeiswanger @msn.com> Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 8:14 PM To: James Hovland; Susan Howl Subject: Please oppose all cruel trapping efforts The Honorable Jim Hovland, Mayor of Edina, The Honorable Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, and Ann Swenson, Edina City Council, Steel -jaw traps, even rubber- coated ones, cause immense pain and injury. Terrified, the trapped animals are further injured in their frantic struggle to get free.' Bones snap, flesh tears, and many victims chew or twist off,their own limbs in order to escape. These traps are also indiscriminant: Any animal, including beloved companion animals, can,fall prey to these. barbaric.devises. Please oppose all cruel trapping efforts! Sincerely, Kaye.Beiswanger Saint Paul, Minnesota i Trevor Isaaman June 14, 2011 5704 Olinger Blvd. (952) 922 -7277 Edina, 55436 Edina Mayor and City Council Members RECEIVED Subject: Waters Senior Housing JUN 2 ' 2011 Dear C t Y I'm alarmed. It would appear Shelter Corporation is making what it deems to be' minor" changes from the, originally plans approved by the Planning Commission and the Edina City Council. The reason for my alarm is because after viewing the changes advocated, is there is absolutely nothing minor about it. Without question this has become a major change. Here's why: O The developer is requesting a significant reduction in the number of parking spaces originally approved. • The number of spaces was originally proposed by the developer in order to meet concerns raised in meetings with residents and planning commission members. ® The developer's proposed revision letter is very vague as to actual numbers. For example, the letter states 36 underground parking spaces will be eliminated, however of these 36, 12 are double spaces — does this mean that the real number of spaces being eliminated is 48? Regardless of which figure is correct, the developer is still eliminating between one fourth and one third of the originally agreed upon and approved spaces. Because my house is directly across Countryside Park from the proposed development, I know first- hand that the current lack of adequate parking is already a problem. The development, even with the originally approved spaces, is certain to exacerbate this problem. Furthermore, apart from the; parking, the developer's letter is short on specifics as to what the actual changes will entail. The letter states 7 affordable unit will be "created." Are these to be in addition to the original 139 approved units, or-is the ratio of memory-care, intensive -care, and assisted living units not being maintained as was originally required? Because the developer's letter is so ambiguous, shouldn't city council determine if these so called "minor" changes will substantially alter the nature of the approved project. Sincerely, Trevor Isaaman c.c. all council members Susan Howl -� CE:wp JUN 2 1 2011 Dear Mayor Hovland, and City Council Members Ann Swenson, Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, and Josh Sprague; In regard to the proposed Shelter /Colonial Water's Project changes I am asking that the procedures put in place in the City of Edina be adhered to and that a public hearing beheld by both the Planning Commission and City .Council in regard to these changes. The Edina Site Plan Application indicates that "Changes tb,site plans that are made after City Council approval, require an amended Site Plan. Changes require a public hearing to be "held b1 both the Planning Commission and "City. Council." Common areas are indicated. to be shrinking, this would be one of the Water's original selling points - "creating common spaces where individuals can gather, socialize' and pursue hobbies and other interests." They indicated that the following common areas would be included,and have the following features: 1.) First Floor Wellness related area: Warm water therapy pool and locker room, Wellness room, Walking track, Exercise area, Chapel /Community Room. 2.) First floor community areas: Bistro /Library/general store with attached screen porch, Living room, Parlor with water fall, Billiards room, Concierge and administrative staff. 3.) Second Floor community areas: 2 resident dining rooms and a commercial kitchen, 2 private family dining rooms, Cinema /Community Room, Crafts Room, Game Room and Parlor. 4.) Memory Support.neighborhoods: Activity /Community areas, Dining room, Quiet room, Spa area, Accessibility to an outside secured court with walking paths and covered resting areas. 5.) Care Suite neighborhood: Activity /Community areas, Dining room, Spa area In regard to the reduction of common areas I .believe that we have, the right to know — a.) What common. areas are going;to be made smaller? b.) How and why did they come to the conclusion to reduce the.common areas size? c.) Is funding or some , _other behind this change tQ..the original plans? d.) If the first floor Wellness area is reduced would it then increase the traffic in and out of the facility as the residents are forced to go elsewhere -for these types of therapy? e.) If the resident dining rooms and commercial kitchen are reduced in size are they then still capable of providing service to as many people that-they are trying to house? f.) With a reduction in these areas are they still within code for the amount of people in the building? The other change that The Waters is indicating is a reduction in parking. Residents have over and over again indicated.that this is a major concern in the area! The Developer was forced to ask for rezoning of PRD -5 (convalescent and nursing home) due to not being able to qualify for PSR because it required more parking. Please keep in mind that all other assisted living places in Edina are zoned PSR, this will be the first PRD -5 in the city. In the original proposal the 1 Shelter Corporation indicated that there would be "more than adequate parking. There will be 100 parking spaces in the underground garage and 85 surface spaces." However, with the new plan, (the second reduction of parking spots by the project), they are reducing parking by 40 %, cutting out 39 total parking spots. I am also curious as to how the parking numbers for the Water's project have been determined. Although it is rezoned for PRD -5, within the Water's project there are actually several different classifications, the larger of which would actually fall under the Multi - Residential use category which makes a huge difference as far as parking requirements go. Even Mr. Jensen himself has indicated that this will be an "active senior community ". The use of Colonial Church has also gone beyond using it's building for the simple Sunday service over the years. Routinely the building and rooms within the building are used (either rented or other) for events that leave the parking inadequate, especially when multiple events happen to fall on the same time frame. Church related major events [funerals, et al] already use the soon- to -be- vacated south parking lot, both sides of Colonial Way and on the streets such as Olinger Boulevard for parking. The overflow can only get worse. Although Shelter Corp. has indicated that the church may use the surface spaces during Sunday's services and other church functions — would that then become a problem to visitors or employees of the facility when they do not have parking ?! I, along with many other residents, are asking that a new traffic study be done. The original study performed by RLK Traffic Impact Analysis states "the existing roadway network is predicted to easily handle the additional traffic generated by the proposed site." The senior housing development will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards. The study was performed using the staff to resident ratios in each main area of the building — (i.e..- assisted care, memory care). At no time was there any mention of other staff needed to run a facility such as this: Kitchen staff, wait staff, delivery trucks, busses to and from for planned activities, cleaning staff, office staff, maintenance crews, spa personal, visitors, parishioners from the church that Shelter Corp. indicated will be so actively involved, etc. The study was also done during a time when the traffic in the area was at an off peak time of the year — during the summer months. The traffic during this time is very much lower due to the lack of transportation of kids to and from school either by bussing or driving, some parents take this time off from work so that they can be home to supervise their children so they are not going to and from work, and many companies choose to work "summer hours" which skew the high traffic times. I also would like to know if per the city guidelines that the traffic and circulation to and from the facility has been looked at ?! Those of us who reside in the area already know how difficult it is to turn in either direction off of ramps from 62 onto Tracy at certain hours of the day — with the additional traffic has the city looked at whether or not there will have to be an addition of traffic lights to the area to control the traffic flow? If eventually they are necessary who would pay the cost for these? Subd. 6 Traffic and Circulation. A. General Requirements. Vehicular traffic shall be channeled and controlled in a manner that will avoid congestion and traffic hazards on the lot or tract or on adjacent streets. Traffic generated by the use shall be directed so as to avoid excessive traffic through residential areas. No parking area, stacking area or circulation area, except for driveway ingresses and egresses, shall be located within a street, alley or highway. B. Review by Engineer. The adequacy of any proposed traffic circulation system on a lot or tract shall be subject to the review of the Engineer who may require additional measures for traffic control to accomplish the orderly and safe movement of traffic including, but not limited to, the following: 1. Directionalsignalization. 2. Channelization. 3. Turn lanes. 4. Increased street width. 5. Warning lights. 6. Stacking lanes. 7. Location, number and width of curb cuts. I believe that before building such a, large facility we really need to take the time to look at all aspects of this project and not only how the facility will affect the surrounding, areas but also how it will affect. the area if it does not succeed. If this building is not a successful venture and the use of it needs to be revamped how will you deal with the issues that go along with that? Such as lack of parking,if it,becomes.a "multi "reside ntial" building? Have all of the questions and costs in regard to what the City will be taking on been truly looked at — do we know how this will affect the Fire Department and EMS, both in additional time needed to respond to issues at the building as well as the cost to the tax payers? With the additional traffic there come additional infrastructure expenses — more traffic, more wear and tear, more repairs — how much will this cost? This project has already made residents question the ability of the City Council to uphold the procedures and ordinances that are set in place. From day one residents in the area of this project have had to remind the City Council and Planning Commission of their duties and time frames which are set forth for them to fulfill them. Not to mention that all though many, many residents have contacted you in regard to their disapproval of such a huge project you have taken it upon yourselves to ignore the concerns and wishes of your constituents. It may even beg the question of whether or not there are dealings that are not above board in regard to this project. Take a moment and ask yourself — would I still put this project through if it was being built in my neighborhood? Respectfully, Molly and Jason Urbanski 5800 Stuart Avenue Edina, MN 55436 952 - 926 -1258 MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY HELD AT CITY HALL APRIL 19, 2011 7:06 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Chair Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Brindle and seconded "by, Commissioner Swenson for approval of, the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 5. 2011. APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Brindle and seconded by Commissioner Swenson approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for April 5, 2011. . Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *TAX INCREMENT FINANCING POLICY APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Brindle and seconded by Commissioner Swenson approving the Tax Increment Financing Policy. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and, Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 7:07 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Scott Neal, Executive Director 0 Fe tA tll v �y vi 0 ,ees HRA REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: CHAIR & COMMISSIONERS Agenda Item Item No: II. B. From: Wayne Houle, PE WIPE- ® Action Public Works Director/ F-1 Discussion City Engineer Date: June 21, 2011 Information Subject: Resolution No. 2011 -01 Approving Second Amendment to Easement & Parking Ramp Agreement for Jerry's Parking Ramp ACTION REQUESTED: Approve attached Resolution No. 2011 -01 to amend easement and parking ramp agreement for Jerry's Parking Ramp. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: This agreement was included and approved with the June 7 City Council Agenda. Due to the ramp being located within the Grandview District, the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority is also required to approve this amendment. ATTACHMENTS: • Resolution No. 2011 -01 (HRA) • Second Amendment to Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \HRH's \Ramps \Grandview Ramp \Agreement \HRA Item II.B. Resolution No. 2011 -01 Approving Second Amendment to Easement & Parking Ramp Agreement for Jerry's Parking Romp.docx RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -01 APPROVING SECOND AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT & PARKING RAMP AGREEMENT FOR JERRY'S PARKING RAMP WHEREAS, the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority and Jerry's Enterprises, Inc. have entered into an agreement for use of the Jerry's Ramp located at 5116 Brookside Avenue; and WHEREAS, the use of the lowest level of the Jerry's Ramp was not clearly defined in the original agreement; and WHEREAS, both parties have agreed to the proposed amendment clarifying the use of the lowest level of the Jerry's Ramp; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority approves the Second Amendment to Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement for Jerry's Parking Ramp. ADOPTED this 21st day of June, 2011. Attest: Ann Swenson, Secretary James B. Hovland, Chair STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting Executive Director for the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority at its Regular Meeting of June 21, 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 20 Executive Director SECOND AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT AND PARKING RAMP AGREEMENT THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT AND PARKING RAMP AGREEMENT (this "Second Amendment ") is made as of , 2011, by and among the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the "City "), the HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota ( "HRA "), and JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC., a Minnesota corporation ( "Jerry's "). RECITALS WHEREAS, The City, the HRA and Jerry's entered into that certain Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement dated as of February 1, 1987, recorded in the office of the Hennepin County Recorder on March 19, 1987, as Document Number 5242349 and in the office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on January 29, 1988, as Document Number 1905238 (the "Original Easement "), as amended by that certain First Amendment to Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement dated as of May 28, 1987, recorded in the office of the Hennepin Country Recorder on April 26, 1988, as Document Number 5400795 and in the office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on April 22, 1988, as Document Number 1922982 (the "First Amendment "). WHEREAS, The City is the owner of certain real property described on Exhibit A attached to the Original Easement (the "City Property "). WHEREAS, Jerry's is the owner of certain real property described on Exhibit B attached to the Original Easement ( "Jerry's Property "). G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \HRA's \Ramps \Grandview Ramp \Agreement \DOCS - #3460073 -v3 -CLEAN Second_ Amendment _to_Parking_Ramp_Agreement Revised.doc WHEREAS, The Original Easement and the First Amendment are collectively referred to as the "Easement" in this Second Amendment. Terms used in this Second Amendment shall have the meanings ascribed in the Easement. WHEREAS, The Original Easement recognized the Contract for Private Redevelopment entered into between Jerry's and the HRA in which the HRA agreed to use its best efforts to cause the City to construct on the City Property certain improvements comprising a two -level parking facility with ingress and egress ramps and spaces for approximately 272 cars and a covered city maintenance building /garage and other public improvements determined by the City or the HRA to be necessary or desirable; WHEREAS, The City has been exclusively using the lowest level of the parking ramp facility (beneath the two parking levels) since the parking ramp facility was constructed; WHEREAS, The parties desire to further amend the Original Easement to more clearly provide for the City's exclusive interest in the lowest level of the parking ramp facility; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. Amendment of Paragraph 2E(1). Paragraph 2E(1) is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows: (1) Jerry's and the City each hereby grants, bargains, quitclaims and conveys to one another perpetual non - exclusive driveway, parking and pedestrian use easements over and across those portions of Jerry's Property, Tract 1 and the City Property which are now or hereafter improved, or reasonably determined by the owner of the property concerned to be necessary to be improved, with driveways, sidewalks or parking spaces for access by vehicles and pedestrians to and from public streets and driveways and the parking ramp which is part of the HRA Public Improvements and for parking. With respect to the city parking ramp facility, the easement provided under this section (1) shall apply only to the upper two (2) levels of the parking ramp facility and shall not include the lowest level of the parking ramp Facility. The City specifically reserves the right to exclusive use of the lowest level of the parking ramp facility. 2. Confirmation. Except as specifically set forth in this Second Amendment, the Easement is hereby confirmed and ratified. 2 G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \HRA's \Ramps \Grandview Ramp \Agreement \DOCS- #3460073v3 -CLEAN Second_ Amendment _to_Parking_Romp_Agreement Revised.doc IN AGREEMENT, the parties have executed this Second Amendment to Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement as of the date and year first above written. CITY OF EDINA By Its Mayor And by Its City Manager JERRY'S ENTERPRISES, INC. By Its President STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Z Its Chairman And by Its Secretary The foregoing Second Amendment to Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement was acknowledged before me this day of , 2011, by James Hovland, the Mayor, and by Scott Neal, the City Manager, of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing Second Amendment to Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement was acknowledged before me this day of , 2011, by , the Chairman, and by , the Secretary, of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority of Edina, Minnesota, a Minnesota body politic and corporation, on behalf of the Authority. Notary Public 3 G: \Engineering\ Infrastructure \HRA's \Ramps \Grandview Ramp \Agreement \DOCS - #3460073 -v3 -CLEAN Second-Amendment-to-Parking-Ramp-Agreement Revised.doc STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN The foregoing Second Amendment to Easement and Parking-.Ramp Agreement was acknowledged before me1his day;of ;'2011., by the President Hof Jerry's' Enterprises;. Inc., a Minnesota corporation, on behalf of the corporation. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY: Campbell .Knutson` Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: 651 -452 -5000: AMP /cjh 4 G: \Engineering\ Infrastructure \HRA's \Ramps \Grandview Ramp \Agreement \DOCS - #3460073 -v3 -CLEAN Second_Amendment_fo Parking_Ramp Agreement Revised.doc CONSENT BY MORTGAGEE Allstate Life Insurance Company, an Illinois insurance corporation, as the Mortgagee of a portion of the Jerry's Property, as described in the foregoing Second Amendment to Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement, pursuant to that certain Mortgage dated May 16, 1995 and recorded May 17, 1995 in the office of the Hennepin County Recorder, as Document No. 6428384 and in the office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles, as Document No. 2608876 hereby consents to the terms and conditions of the forgoing Second Amendment to Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement. ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY By Its And Its STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing Consent by Mortgagee was acknowledged before me this day of , 2011, by and , respectively the and of Allstate Life Insurance Company, an Illinois insurance corporation, on behalf of the insurance corporation. Notary Public 5 G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \HRA's \Ramps \Grandview Ramp \Agreement \DOCS - #3460073 -v3 -CLEAN Second-Amendment to_parking_Romp_Agreement Revised.doc June 15, 2011 Mao Yang State Aid Division Transportation Bldg 395 John Ireland Blvd. Mail Stop 315 St. Paul, MN 55155 RE: City of Edina 2011 Grant Application Minnesota Safe Routes to School Dear MaoYang: City of Edina We respectfully submit the City of Edina's above grant application for the 2011 Safe Routes to School Infrastructure improvements. Included with this application is the following: 2011 Grant Application Worksheet Appendix A — G Letters of Support from: o Edina Public Schools o Normandale Elementary School • City of Bloomington . • Edina Police Department o Bike Edina Task Force Metropolitan Planning Organization Notification Letter City of Edina Roadway Authority Letter of Concurrence Preliminary Cost Estimate We have created a project that includes three separate sidewalk improvement projects located within a one -half mile walking zone of a campus of three schools, a community center and a sports complex. These sidewalks are located in various locations around the perimeter of the campus. It would be possible to award any combination of the three sidewalk projects (one, two or all three) without adversely affecting the safety and volume of students bicycling and walking to school as anticipated from the proposed improvements. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 If you have any questions or need additional information please contact me at 952- 826 -0443 or at whouleCcD-ci.edina.mn.us. Sincerely, Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer C: Edina City Council Edina City Manager Edina Police Department Edina School District Bike Edina Task Force Edina Transportation Commission G: \Englneering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Sldewalks n Bikeways \Safe Route to School \2011 Application \2011 Application Packet \20110615 application letter,doc C"�P" Or, Minnesota Department of Transportation SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL � 2011 INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT APPLICATION 750 1 a Q O p" O " K -5 1A. Applicant: Normandale Elementary Southview Middle 614 1,303 1st Name Wayne Last Houle 5 122 Wayne Houle, City Eng. Organization City of Edina Title Public Works Director/City Engineer City of Edina Address: 7450 Metro Boulevard City Edina State Minn Zip 55439 Z 0 Phone Number 1(952)826-0443--1 Email whoule @ci.edina.mn.us 1B. Sponsor z0 1st Name Scott Last Neal F o a �, �- m Organization City of Edina Title City Manager Z 0 v Address: 4801 West 50th Street City Edina State Minn Zip 55424 Phone Number (952)927 -8861 Email sneal @ci.edina.mn.us 1C. MPO 1st Name James Last Andrew I Organization Metropolitan Council Title Senior Planner 2A. Location City I Edina County 027 HENNEPr Mn /DOT District 213. Brief project description (infrastructure) Sidewalk improvements to extend the walking shed around the Southview Campus. This campus consists of two elementary schools, one middle school, the Edina Community Center and multiple sport facilities. 0 a) 2C. Project Cost W 2D. School(s) YM V o a� N SRTS Funding Request 465, 061.50 Total Project Cost 1 465,061.5 q School Name Student Pop Grades Students to Benefit Concord Elementary 1117531 K -5 60 Normandale Elementary Southview Middle 614 1,303 K -5 6 -9 5 122 Wayne Houle, City Eng. Concord Avenue City of Edina Wayne Houle, City Eng. 2E. Roadway Information Roadway Name Road Authority (town, city, county, state) contact Person School Road City of Edina Wayne Houle, City Eng. Normandale Road City of Edina Wayne Houle, City Eng. Concord Avenue City of Edina Wayne Houle, City Eng. qo,0 "E804 Minnesota Department of Transportation p p SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL o ° o° AIWl GRANT APPLICATION ° 2011 INFRASTRUCTURE 3A. Provide a brief description of the current condition and identify problems, risks and obstacles that impede safe travel to school. Explain how the problems were identified and summarize relevant supporting documents (relevant planning documents, maps, surveys, and /or crash data) that demonstrates need. Attach at least 1 map per location that identifies routes to school and problem areas. A task force consisting of staff from the City of Edina, Edina School staff, Bike Edina Task Force members, Edina Transportation Commission members and Bloomington Public Health staff (facilitators of our Statewide Health Improvement Program monies) met numerous times to evaluate ways to improve safe walking and bicycling to Edina Schools. The Southview Campus was selected for the large concentration of schools and activities. This campus consists of two elementary schools, one middle school, the Edina Community Center and multiple sports facilities. After review of the campus, three areas stood out for needing improvements to extend the existing sidewalk network to capture more students and get them safely to school and events. Appedix A shows the three areas adjacent to this campus. - School Road Sidewalk (South of Concord Elementary School), See Appendix A, B and C School Road is the only access to Concord Elementary School. This residential roadway is bordered by homes on the south side and west end. All busses, parents and staff must travel on this 28 foot wide roadway to gain access to the elementary school. The narrow width of the road (especially in winter), coupled with the 600 cars and buses that travel at an 85% speed of 34.1 mph (posted speed of 30 mph) make it dangerous for students who walk or bike to school from the south. In response to these safety concerns, residents have requested the City Council to construct a sidewalk along School Road to separate vehicles from students walking to school. Z - Normandale Road Sidewalk (Southwest of the campus), See Appendix A, D and E 0 O The Benton Avenue Bridge is the only vehicle crossing of Highway 100 for a mile in either direction. Therefore U. Z a large number of vehicles (almost 5000), pedestrians and bikes use this bridge to access the Southview Campus. The bridge itself has wide enough raised sidewalks but outdated pedestrian curb ramps and limited sidewalk v w west of Highway 100. In 2008 and 2009 the City successfully installed a sidewalk north of Benton Avenue on Normandale Road. This sidewalk was so well received that approximately 92 residents have since petitioned the City for sidewalk along Normandale Road south of Benton Avenue to capture pedestrians and bicyclists from a the south and west. ri This section of roadway has approximately 2600 cars per day traveling at an 85% speed of 36.2 mph (posted speed of 30 mph). The east side of the roadway has a five foot grass boulevard up against the chain link fence of Highway 100. The west side of the road has a between 20 and 80 foot of grass boulevard that pedestrians us to access the Benton Avenue bridge. - Concord Avenue Sidewalk (Northeast of the campus), See Appendix A, F and G Concord Avenue along the Southview Campus was reconstructed in 2007. As part of this reconstruction sidewalk was brought to the comer of Southview Lane and Concord Avenue with the intent of extending it to the north when funding became available. The sidewalk currently stops and directs pedestrians in to the road. This section of roadway "drains" a large number of residential homes that creates conflicts between the 1300 cars per day and the pedestrians and bicyclists destined for the school campus. Minnesota Department of Transportation SAFF '�� � Oo p O ° SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL oQ o GRANT APPLICATION"'dOL 2011 INFRASTRUCTURE 313. Describe the proposed infrastructure project and how it addresses the problems in question 3A. Provide information on the constructability of the infrastructure and provide any typical sections or plans if applicable. Our approach is to address this area holistically to extend safe routes to the campus from the south (School Road Sidewalk), southwest (Nonnandale Road Sidewalk) and the northeast (Concord Avenue Sidewalk). The City believes all three of the sidewalks address the problems described in Section 3A. Since these sidewalks are in various locations around the perimeter of the Southview campus it would be possible to build any combination of the sidewalks (one, two or all three sections) based on funding granted by SRTS. All proposed improvements will be constructed to current federal and state requirements and will be built within the City of Edina's Right of Way. The sidewalks will be maintained by the City of Edina, including snow removal. Pedestrian curb ramp upgrades or installations will be part of the project as well. - School Road Sidewalk (South of Concord Elementary School), See Appendix A, B and C; estimated cost of $141,225. The 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk is proposed on the north side of School road to minimize driveway crossings and to utilize the boulevard area that abuts Concord Elementary School. The sidewalk will have a 5 foot grass boulevard to separate pedestrians from the roadway, further increasing safety. This sidewalk will connect to the existing sidewalk along Concord Avenue and to the Valley View sidewalk that is under construction in the summer of 2011 creating a large network of sidewalks facilities south, west and east of this Z p school. 2 The task force investigated the ability to restrict (or prohibit) school traffic from using School Road west of pConcord Elementary School but determined there would be too much congestion at the intersection of ZConcord Z Avenue and School Road due to the turning buses, parent drop off and staff if everyone was forced to F use the one access location. a w a- Normandale Road Sidewalk (Southwest of the campus), See Appendix A, D and E; estimated cost of ri $172,631. The community support in the form of over 90 petitioners shows the desire of residents to have a safe way to access the campus from the southwest. Highway 100 is a physical barrier that requires all traffic from this quadrant to be directed up along Normandale Road resulting in high traffic volumes and speeds. There is ample room to install a 6 foot sidewalk along the west side ofNormandale Road while minimizing the impact to residents. There are no driveways along this side of the roadway to create potential pedestrian/ vehicle conflicts. Staff looked at constructing a sidewalk on streets further west but there would be more front yard and driveway impacts. The sidewalk would also upgrade a number of pedestrian curb ramps at the Benton Avenue bridge to meet current ADA design standards and to facilitate better winter snow removal foryear round pedestrian activities. - Concord Avenue Sidewalk (Northeast of the campus), See Appendix A, F and G; estimated cost of $151205 A five foot wide boulevard sidewalk is proposed along Concord Avenue from Southview Road up to Lakeview Drive. This sidewalk would separate the pedestrians from the roadway traffic and create a safe 1000 foot extension to the sidewalk network that existing along Concord Avenue further south. The pedestrians would then be able to cross at the all -way stop sign controlled intersection at Concord Avenue and Southview Road. Or,1NE6pT{t Minnesota Department of Transportation SM a ra SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL y o OQ ° 2011 INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT APPLICATION Q NOW a x N o% w Z o~c a a IV W Z J W v W O tr a W) 0 U W o or o. W Information about SRTS partnerships. Who and what organizations are participating in the planning, coordinating, and monitoring of the project to ensure its success? Provide a letter of concurrence or agreement from each partner that describes their role and responsibilities. 1. 1 Edina Public Schools 2. Normandale Elementary School 3. Bloomington Public Health 4 Edina Police Department 5. Bike Edina Task Force 6. 7. 8. Use the Project Authorization Guide to plan out the project timeline Date Milestone 09/15/2011 Submit Before - SRTS parent survey and in -class student tally* Unit FHWA authorization to proceed with design (1 -3 weeks) Requested SRTS Funds All NEPA requirements met (1 -2 months) Prepare construction documents (hire professional assistance if necessary). 12/0112011 Agreement between Mn /DOT and the Sponsor prepared(1 -2 months) 01/1512012 1 Obtain necessary permits. 02/15/2012 Submit construction documents to DSAE for approval. 15000.00 Plan approval by DSAEand SALT. FHWA authorization to proceed with construction. (1 -3 weeks) 04/20/2012 Project let by competitive bid DCP process. (min 5 weeks) All Other Award Contract 06/15/2012 Project work commences. 08/20/2012 Project work completed. 12121/2012 Submit After - SRTS parent survey and in -class student tally* 02/10/2013 Project bills submitted to District State Aid Engineer 06/01/2013 Project inspected and closed out. (Completed by 12/31/2013) 'Parent survey and in -class student tally should be collected and submitted to the National Center for SRTS before any SRTS oroiect activities take Dlace and after the Droiect is completed. Use the form below to breakdown the major costs of the project and attach a document with detailed cost breakdowns. A sample is provided in the application guide. Estimated Costs Item Quantity Unit Unit Cost Requested SRTS Funds Pre - Construction Preliminary Design 3.00 Lump Sum 15,000.00 15000.00 Planning All Other 2,665.00 Each 0.60 1599.00 Construction Construct Engineering 3.00 Lump Sum 10,000.00 30000.00 All Other 11.00 Lump Sum 418,462.50 418462.50 SRTS is a reimbursable program therefore funds requested must be available upfront for Total 465061.50 use on the project then reimbursed through invoices during the course of the project. a9 Minnesota Department of Transportation Q SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL �•� 1 0 k INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT APPLICATION 2011 �ORTpA� Z The school(s) benefiting from the program is(are) required to collect data before and after the o SRTS program using the National Center for Safe Routes to School student travel tally and parent a survey. Applicants will be disqualified if the school does not participate in the surveys. Please check the box below to indicate your intent. w ® Yes, the school(s) understand and agree to conduct the surveys No, the school(s) will not agree to conduct the surveys Signature Applications must be signed and reviewed by an authorized representative of the applicant By signing this document, the applicant affirms that the statements contained in the application package are true and complete to the best of the applicant's knowledge and assumes responsibility for securing the necessary permits and following all Federal, Mn /DOT, and State Z Aid design standards. _0 U) Applicant Signature (required) 0 w cY w It ad r Name Date Filing Instructions The 2011 SRTS Application Form is a Formatta form and is designed to be completed on your local workstation. The procedure is to download the form and instructions from the Mn /DOT Safe Routes To School website http: / /www.dot.state .mn.us /saferoutes /index.htmi and save it to your local system. You will also need a small, free application called 'Filler' that allows you to open and complete the form. Filler is available here: httpJ /www.dot.state.mn.us /stateald/ formatta/FillerSetupNR.exe. As you download Filler, accept the License Agreement Accept the Default Destination Location. After the software installs a blank Registration form appears. Ignore this form by clicking the X to close. You will only need to downloaded and installed filler once for each workstation. Please try to be brief and concise when completing the application. Do not include non - relavant information or attachments. When the electronic application is completed please ensure that you have saved it to your local drive or server. Print the application and sign and date on the signature line above. Send the completed electronic application attached to an e-mail to SafeRoutes.DOT@state.mn.us Use the US mail to send 5 copies of the printed application, maps, letters of concurrence, letters of support and other relavant attachments to: Mao Yang Mn /DOT State Aid Division 395 John Ireland Blvd, Mail Stop 500 St. Paul, MN 55155 Electronic and paper copies of the applications are due to Mn /DOT State Aid Division by June 15, 2011 at 4:30 PM CDT. If you have questions about the program or application please submit them to: SafeRoutes.DOT @state.mn.us or call 651 -366 -3827 List of Attachments 2011 Minnesota Safe Routes to School Infrastructure Grant Application Appendix A— Southview Campus Map Appendix B —School Road Sidewalk Map Appendix C — School Road Sidewalk Exhibit Appendix D — Normandale Road Sidewalk Map Appendix E — Normandale Road Sidewalk Exhibit Appendix F — Concord Avenue Sidewalk Map Appendix G — Concord Avenue Sidewalk Exhibit Letters of Support — Edina Public Schools Superintendent Normandale Elementary School Principal City of Bloomington Edina Police Department Bike Edina Task Force Letter to Metropolitan Council (MPO for the project) Letter of Concurrence City of Edina Public Works Director /City Engineer Cost Estimate Fix- v. or ' a, V I LAKEVIEW DR l CONCORD AVE r. WALK I SOUTH VIEW RD f Edina -South View Community Middle Center School — y 'Nor andale p - �. Elementary, •` I School W 58TH ST CURB RAMP a UPGRADES 0 O U - BENTON AVE �-- ►t ' - z Concord U — -- y Elementary NORMANDALE RD School WALK - - -� T SCHOOL RD t z. SCHOOL RD - WALK LEGEND Proposed Sidewalk Existing Sidewalk Sidewalk Under Construction Half Mile Walking Radius 491N�1LL. y�o. ,e�, 1/M Engineering Dept June, 2011 VABC�YVmE RD m III Oil" City of Edina South View Campus Appendix A 4'•A N W +E S 0 350700 Feet MEEK== 07^ r t tf ti i i _ a Concord c {�� Elementary School % SCHOOL RD r � _ - I l.' rY ..�• -.may -' - ] IA/ CnTU CT J771 1 T LEGEND Proposed Sidewalk Existing Sidewalk• • • Sidewalk Under Construction w City of Edina School Road Sidewalk Engineer Dept Appendix B June, 200 11 t sk SCHOOL RD ;M`ta` WALK L ry a O U Z °� 5. N W +E 0 150 5300 Feet ELEMENTARY SCHOOL pk . f PROPOSED TYPICAL OF SCHOOL ROAD 5 FOOT CONCRETE SIDEWALK 2.0' S.0' 5.0' 2 - - -> EXISTING C &G L L X. VAR. 6" TOPSOIL & SOD 6" TOPSOIL PROFILE & SOD GRADE DETAIL A SCHOOL ROAD SIDEWALK Appendix C i NORMANDALE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 's.91 'end` k t CURB RAMP I � UPGRADES -- _. CURB RAMP 3 ! UPGRADES BENTON AVE i (N;OIRMANDA'LE RD ALK i r r W 60TH ST r LEGEND Proposed Sidewalk Existing Sidewalk �wROAD' O - _ • • Sidewalk Under Construction Q' low. N 491N� \f'�• City of Edina W _ E Normanadale Road Sidewalk 0 100 5200 Feet Engineering Dept Appendix D June, 2011 NORMANDALE ROAD LOOKING NORTH AT NORMANDALE/ VALLEY VIEW ROAD NORMANDALE ROAD LOOKING SOUTH AT NORMANDALE ROAD PROPOSED TYPICAL OF NORMANDALE ROAD 5 FOOT CONCRETE SIDEWALK 2.0' S.0' 5.0' 2 % - -> VAR. EXISTING C &G L- = - -_ -- __ 6" TOPSOIL & SOD 6" TOPSOIL PROFILE GRADE & SOD DETAIL A NORMANDALE ROAD SIDEWALK Appendix E � ? LAKEVIEW � . doom -� �. "• �� ',�..�_ �.. _ � � ,; .rte ��I ` wtl t��� •;��.: - Jou i .. .�.• ..s ,.rte "wb• •� ► •sY dh CONCORD AVE ' , 1 WALK p. � I :tea _ `•.^" �, _ F ' _ `J�..ar., n.,, .. hraF,. ���a" ' �••,��° ,- , :'�1ra '�� ! - :•r/ � � -���. ' per•' t' SOUTH VIEW RD - 0, UJ rat A "• _ Q South View I -- J Middle —� O U I School - !O i III _ U LEGEND Proposed Sidewalk Existing Sidewalk e � �, 1v9��G4 o 4 Engineering Dept June, 2011 City of Edina Concord Avenue Sidewalk Appendix F W 58TH ST N W +E S 0 100 200 Feet i< CONCORD AVENUE LOOKING SOUTH AT SOUTHVIEW LANE PROPOSED TYPICAL OF CONCORD AVENUE 5 FOOT CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPOSED C &G 6" TOPSOIL & SOD PROFILE GRADE - FOW DETAIL A 5.0' 5.0' 2.0. < - -A. 6" TOPSOIL & SOD CONCORD AVENUE LOOKING NORTH AT SOUTHVIEW LANE SIDEWALK ENDS BY DIRECTING STUDENTS TO THE STREET. CONCORD AVENUE SIDEWALK Appendix G ��Sch • �:ls DEFINING EXCELLENCE June 15, 2011 Mao Yang State Aid Division Transportation Bldg 395 John Ireland Blvd. Mail Stop 315 St. Paul, MN 55155 ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 5701 Normandale Road Edina, MN 55424 (952) 848 -3900 www.edina.k12.mn.us RE: City of Edina 2011 Grant Application for Minnesota Safe Routes to School Dear Ms. Yang: I am aware that the City of Edina is applying for the Minnesota 2011 Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Infrastructure Grant that will positively impact my school district. I am aware of the scope of the grant application that will provide sidewalk improvements within the walking area of the Southview School Campus. I support the proposed projects and feel that it will be an important enhancement to the school environment. The City of Edina has been collaborating with the School District to target K -8th grade schools within Edina to improve the safety and number of students walking and bicycling to school. This grant is another important component of this effort. If this project is selected, I will continue to work with School District Transportation staff and the City of Edina, to implement education and encouragement programs that will support the facility improvements and encourage students to walk and bicycle to school. Our schools also. agrees to conduct the before and after evaluations using the Student Travel Tally and the Parent Survey to assist in assessing the results of the Safe Routes to Schools improvements. Sin c re en, Ed.D. ip n endent, Edina Public Schools NAOrgs, Prtnrshps, Govt\Letter of Support.CW� CARE V WE DARE V WE SHARE H 0 0 1 t. LA Ak W PA L K H ELEMENTARY FRENCH IMMERSION SCHOOL June 14, 2011 Mao Yang State Aid Division Transportation Bldg 395 John Ireland Blvd. Mail Stop 315 St. Paul, MN 55155 5701 Normondale Rood Edlno, Minnesota 55424 Telephone: 952.848.4100 Fox: 952.848.4101 RE: City of Edina 2011 Grant Application for Minnesota Safe Routes to School Dear Ms. Yang: I am aware that the City of Edina is applying for the Minnesota 2011 Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Infrastructure Grant and my school, Normandale Elementary, is included in the proposed project. I am aware of the scope of the grant application that will provide sidewalk improvements within the walking area of my school. I support the proposed project and feel that it will be a positive addition to the school environment. The City of Edina has been collaborating with the School District to target K -8th grade schools within Edina to improve the safety and number of students walking and bicycling to school. If this project is selected, I will continue to work with School District Transportation staff and the City of Edina, to implement education and encouragement programs that will support the facility improvements. Our school also agrees to conduct the before and after evaluations using the Student Travel Tally and the Parent Survey to assist in assessing the results of the Safe Routes to Schools improvements. Sincerely, frinciphn Devine al Committed to the finest in Public School Education Today for the World of Tomorrow G CITY OF BLOOMINGTON MINNESOTA June 13; 2011 Mao Yang State Aid Division Transportation Bldg 395 John Ireland Blvd. Mail Stop 315 St. Paul, MN 55155 Dear Ms. Yang: I am pleased to provide a letter support for the City of Edina's application for the Minnesota 2011 Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Infrastructure Grant. I am aware of the scope of the grant application that will provide pedestrian crossing safety improvements within the walking area of three Edina schools. The City of Bloomington Public Health Division actively supports Safe Routes to School efforts throughout the Edina School District. If this project is selected, we will continue to work with city and school district staff to implement education and encouragement programs that will support the facility improvements and encourage students to walk and bicycle to school. Sincerely, Karen Zeleznak, MPH, MS Public Health Administrator PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION 1900 W. OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD, BLOOMINGTON MN 55431 -3095 AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION /EQUAL V /TTY 952 -563 -8900 FAX 952 - 563 -8997 OPPORTUNITIES EMPLOYER trr tl D J � City of Edina June 14, 2011 Mao Yang State Aid Division Transportation Bldg 395 John Ireland Blvd. Mail Stop 315 St. Paul, MN 55155 RE: City of Edina 2011 Grant Application for Minnesota Safe Routes to School Dear Ms. Yang: I am aware that the City of Edina is applying for the Minnesota 2011 Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Infrastructure Grant for the Southview Campus. I am also aware of the scope of the grant application that will provide sidewalk improvements within the walking area of the Southview Campus. I support the proposed project and feel that it- will be a positive addition to the school environment. The City of Edina has been collaborating with the School District to target K -8th grade schools within Edina to improve the safety and number of students walking and bicycling to school. A chronic problem around our schools is the traffic congestion created at pick up /drop off times. Our hope is that the SRTS will reduce the amount of traffic by allowing families to feel confident that their children can walk /ride to school safely. Pedestrian safety is a top priority for the Edina Police Department and this grant would allow us to significantly improve what is currently a chronic problem in, and around, our schools. If this project is selected, I will continue to work with School District Transportation staff and the City of Edina, to implement education and encouragement programs that will support the facility improvements and encourage students to walk and bicycle to school. Sincerely, 4( Jeff Long, Chief of Police City of Edina, Minnesota Edina Police Department Administration (612) 925 -2242 4801 WEST'50TH STREET FAX (612) 927 -5032 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 INVESTIGATIONS (612) 925 -2240 r -s -- E ®1 NA Mao Yang State Aid Division Transportation Bldg 395 John Ireland Blvd. Mail Stop 315 St. Paul, MN 55155 RE: City of Edina 2011 Grant Application for Minnesota Safe Routes to School Dear Ms. Yang: June 14, 2011 am pleased to know that the City of Edina is applying for the Minnesota 2011 Safe Routes to School (SRTS) Infrastructure Grant for the South View campus. I am aware of the scope of the grant application that will provide sidewalk improvements within the walking area of the campus. I support the proposed project because it will be a positive addition to the school environment. Although this project focuses on walking (sidewalks), we appreciate the improvements because having more people on foot results in less motorized congestion issues. It also encourages healthier, active living and improves air quality around the schools. I live a few blocks from South View, and I know neighbors that drive their kids every day to school when they would be better off walking. The proposed improvements will result in more families walking to school. The Bike Edina Task Force has been active with schools, for example partnering with leaders at Concord Elementary and Highlands Elementary for hosting educational activities such as the annual "Bike Rodeo" where hundreds of elementary children have practiced safe bicycling skills at skills stations at the schools. While we generally don't recommend using bicycles on sidewalks for safety reasons, we heartily endorse both walking and bicycling facilities because they are a powerful combination to create a healthy school transportation experience. This project is part of that holistic end result. If this project is selected, I will continue to work with School District Transportation staff and the City of Edina to implement education and encouragement programs that will support the facility improvements and encourage students to walk and bicycle to school. Sincerely, 16�4-6(� Kirk Johnson, on behalf of the Bike Edina Task Force (BETF) Copy: Wayne Houle, BETF Liaison and City Contact, also Jack Sullivan Assistant City Engineer, and the BETF June 13, 2011 James Andrew Senior Planner Metropolitan Council 390 Robert -Street North 'St'. Paul, MN 55101 RE: City of Edina 2011 Grant Application Minnesota Safe Routes to School Dear Mr. Andrew City of Edina_ This letter is to notify the Metropolitan Council that the City of Edina has submitted an application for the State of Minnesota 2011 Safe Routes to School Infrastructure Grant: The grant application was due on June 15, 2011 and successful applicants will be notified in August of:2011 If the City of Edina is successful in receiving funding for improvements consistent with the stated; purposes of the Safe Routes to School .(SRTS) Program we'll inform you of the proposed improvements as required bythe SRTS: If you. have any questions or need ,'additional information please contact me at 952 - 826 -0443 or at whoule' O_ci.edina:'mn.us. Sincerely, Wayne Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Sidewalks n Bikeways \Safe Route to School \2011 Application \2011 Application Packet \201 10615 James_Adrew_MPO Letter.doc City (Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAk952- 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 June 15, 2011 Mao Yang State Aid Division Transportation Bldg 395 John Ireland Blvd. Mail Stop 315 St. Paul, MN 55155 RE: City of Edina 2011 Grant Application Minnesota Safe Routes to School Dear Mao Yang: City of Edina As the sole affected roadway authority for the 2011 grant application for Safe Routes to School the City of Edina has reviewed the application and concurs with the proposed improvements. If you have any questions or need additional information please contact me at 952- 826 -0443 or at whoule(aD-ci.edina.mn.us. Sincerely, 46Z�P'0'10 .44" Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Sidewalks n Bikeways \Safe Route to School\2011 Application\2011 Application Packet\20110615 letter of concurrence from roadway authority .doc City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 2011 SA iLITES TO SCHOOL CITY �. ANA Junt �4, 2011 INFRASTRUCTURE GRANT APPLICATION COST ESTIMATE ESTIMATED INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS School Rd Sidewalk Normandale Rd Sidewalk Concord Ave Sidewalk Item Unit Unit Cost PRE - CONSTRUCTION Requested Quantity SRTS Funds Requested Quantity SRTS Funds Requested Quantity SRTS Funds Preliminary Engineering Lump Sum $ 5,000.00 Parent Surveys Each $ 0.60 CONSTRUCTION 1 $ 5,000.00 750 $ 450.00 1 $ 5,000.00 615 $ 369.00 1 $ 5,000.00 1300 $ 780.00 Construction Engineering Mobilization Clearing and Grubbing Tree Trimming Remove Curb and Gutter Remove Concrete Sidewalk Remove Bituminous Pavement Sawing Bituminous Pavement Common Excavation Aggregate Base Class 7 Bituminous Pavement 4" Concrete Walk Pedestrian Curb Ramp Concrete Curb and Gutter 8618 Stone Retaining Wall (Lannon Stone) Traffic Control Silt Fence Inlet Protection Sodding Type Lawn (With 6" Topsoil) Lump Sum Lump Sum Tree Hour LF SF SY LF CY CY TON SF EACH LF SF Lump Sum LF EACH SY $ 10,000.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 600.00 $ 200.00 $ 8.00 $ 6.00 $ 4.25 $ 3.50 $ 30.00 $ 25.00 $ 120.00 $ 6.25 $ 600.00 $ 20.00 $ 38.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 4.00 $ 200.00 $ 6.50 1 1 3 5 100 200 100 100 250 150 50 7500 6 100 750 1 400 8 1350 $ 10,000.00 $ 7,000.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 800.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 425.00 $ 350.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 3,750.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 46,875.00 $ 3,600.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 28,500.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 1,600.00 $ 1,600.00 $ 8,775.00 1 1 5 250 100 100 250 250 130 80 5250 9 250 1800 1 400 5 1200 $ 10,000.00 $ 7,000.00 $ _ $ 11000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 600.00 $ 425.00 $ 875.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 3,250.00 $ 9,600.00 $ 32,812.50 $ 5,400.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 68,400.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 1,600.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 7,800.00 1 1 6 100 150 400 900 200 150 200 4500 2 900 600 1 4 2000 $ 10,000.00 $ 7,000.00 $ _ $ 1,200.00 $ 800.00 $ 900.00 $ 1,700.00 $ 3,150.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 3,750.00 $ 24,000.00 $ 28,125.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 18,000.00 $ 22,800.00 $ 3,000.00 $ - $ 800.00 $ 13,000.00 TOTAL $ 141,22S.00 $. 172,631.50 $ 151,205.00 GRAND TOTAL $ 465,061.50 1 OF 1 ,11% Louis Park MINNESOTA www.stiouispark.org June 7, 2011 Hennepin County Board Mayor Rybak and City Council, City of Minneapolis Minneapolis Park Board St. Louis Park School Board and Superintendent Ron Latz, State Senator Steve Simon, State Representative Ryan Winkler, State Representative Mayor Hovland, City of Edina Mayor Maxwell, City of Hopkins Mayor Schneider, City of Minnetonka Mayor Tyra- Lukens, City of Eden Prairie Susan Haigh, Chair — Metropolitan Council James Brimeyer, District 6 Representative — Metropolitan Council Thomas Sorel, Commissioner — Minnesota Department of Transportation SWLRT Management Committee SWLRT Community Works Steering Committee Cristofer Gears, Superintendent — Three Rivers Parks District Mark Wegner, President — Twin Cities and Western Railroad Dear Colleague, St. Louis Park has been a long standing supporter of the Southwest Light Rail Transit project and that support continues to this day. As with any major project of this nature, challenges arise that need to be addressed along the way. One of these challenges relates to how to address freight rail traffic in the Kenilworth Corridor in Minneapolis. In its current configuration, light rail and freight rail are not able to co -exist in the Kenilworth Corridor in Minneapolis and a solution needs to be found. An assumption made as a part of the planning for the Southwest project was that freight rail would be relocated out of the corridor in Minneapolis and rerouted through another part of St. Louis Park. The City of St. Louis Park has never agreed to this approach for resolving the freight rail issue. In fact, St. Louis Park expressed its opposition to this approach going back to 2001. More recently, in July, 2010 the St. Louis Park City Council adopted a resolution that echoed the position taken in 2001 and further indicated that St. Louis Park continues to oppose the freight rail reroute unless two conditions were met. First, it needed to be clearly proven that no other viable route existed; and second (assuming the first condition was met), that a host of identified mitigation measures were implemented to address the impacts of the freight rail reroute on the St. Louis Park community. 5005 Minnetonka Blvd. • St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416 -2216 Phone: (952) 924 -2500 • Fax: (952) 924 -2170 • Hearing Impaired: (952) 924 -2518 Page Two June 7, 2011 Since July, 2010 Hennepin County and MnDOT have undertaken a Feasibility Study and EAW regarding the freight rail reroute through St. Louis Park. In addition, the City of St. Louis Park retained its own consultant to advise the City Council and undertake a series of technical analyses regarding the freight rail issue. Based upon this technical analysis and the review of the EAW, the St. Louis Park City Council has determined that there is in fact another viable option for freight rail, in this case co- location with light rail in the Kenilworth Corridor in Minneapolis, and that it can be done less expensively than the proposed reroute option in St. Louis Park. In addition, the mitigation proposed in the EAW prepared by Hennepin County does not address the mitigation needs identified by the St. Louis Park City Council last July. As a result, the two conditions set by the St. Louis Park City Council in July, 2010 have not been met in order for it to lift its opposition to the rerouting of freight rail traffic. On Tuesday, May 31, 2011 the St. Louis Park City Council adopted the attached resolution that once again reiterates its continuing support for the Southwest LRT project but also indicating its continued opposition to the reroute of freight traffic in St. Louis Park. The decision made by the St. Louis Park City Council to adopt this position was not done lightly and only after extensive analysis and discussion. We are hopeful that a resolution can be found to this issue such that the Southwest LRT Project can move forward on schedule, and we stand ready to meet and actively participate in the process of arriving at an acceptable solution. erely, eff b ayor, City of St. Louis Park JJ /df Enclosure cc: St. Louis Park Mayor and City Council Richard Johnson, Hennepin County Administrator City Managers for the Cities of Edina, Hopkins, Minnetonka and Eden Prairie Jayne Miller, Minneapolis Park Board Mark Fuhrmann, Metropolitan Council Phil Eckhert, Hennepin County Katie Walker, Hennepin County Tim Spencer, MnDOT RESOLUTION NO. 11 -058 RESOLUTION RELATING TO FREIGHT RAIL ACTIVITY IN THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park is committed to protecting and enhancing the quality of its neighborhoods; and, WHEREAS, several railroads operate within the City of St. Louis Park and the City seeks to reduce the impacts of freight rail traffic on the community of St. Louis Park; and, WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park has participated in the Technical, Policy and Community Advisory Committees for the Southwest Transitway, as well as the Southwest Corridor Community Works Steering and Technical Committees, and the Metropolitan Council Southwest Management Committee for Southwest LRT; and WHEREAS, the Southwest LRT Policy Advisory Commtteee (PAC) unanimously recommended the selection of Route 3A as the locally preferred alternative with conditions including that agencies work cooperatively to identify impacts, mitigation requirements, and mitigation funding options to address the potential of rerouting freight rail in a parallel process with the Southwest LRT DEIS and to identify the freight rail issue and impacts as a part of the "secondary and cumulative impacts;" and, WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park has reviewed several studies completed by Hennepin County including the TCWR Freight Rail Realignment Study by TKDA, dated November, 2009, Kenilworth Corridor: Analysis of Freight Rail /LRT Coexistence by RL Banks, dated November 2010, and the Freight Rail Study Evaluation of TCWR Routing Alternatives, by Amfahr Consulting, dated November 2010; and WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park is reviewing the MNS EAW prepared by Kimley Horn for Hennepin County Regional Rail Authority and MnDOT for the potential 'of rerouting freight rail traffic to the MNS line; and WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park adopted Resolution 10 -070 (attached) on July 6, 2010, stating that it opposes the rerouting of freight rail traffic from the Kenilworth corridor to St. Louis Park unless certain conditions were clearly met; and WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park completed its own studies in addition to Hennepin County's studies on rail routes, including SEH Technical Memorandums #1, 2, 3, and 4; and WHEREAS, the City Council of St. Louis Park that the City of St. Louis Park makes the following findings: 1. It has been established in Technical Memorandum #3 by SEH that there is a viable route through the Kenilworth Corridor for light rail and freight rail, with the relocation of a Resolution No. 11 -058 -2- portion of the regional trail, acquisition of property and appropriate mitigation measures to address such items as grade separated crossings, and station area impacts. In comparison to' the MNS line, the Kenilworth route is shorter, has fewer curves, has fewer elevation changes and is significantly less expensive to construct. 2. The appropriate mitigation of any and all negative impacts associated with rail rerouting have not been included in the EAW for the MNS Reroute Study. The potential negative impacts that are not thoroughly addressed include but are not limited to noise, vibration, odors, traffic congestion and safety, school use and safety, park use and safety; potentially diminished property values; and, circulation/access in the community by vehicle, pedestrian, transit and bicycle. 3. The proposed reroute of train traffic to the MNS line does not include (a) the elimination of railroad switching, sorting and blocking operations within the City of St. Louis Park, (b) the removal of the existing "wye" rail tracks in the vicinity of Oxford Street and its replacement with a new direct connection to MNS south bound, and (c) the removal of the other tracks not needed for through train traffic including the rail tracks east of the proposed north interconnection. 4. The proposed reroute of train traffic to the MNS without a direct connection to MNS south bound could result in negative community impacts from trains using the proposed north bound connection to the MNS as a means to access the MNS tracks to go south. Neighborhoods north of the Bass Lake Spur would be unnecessarily exposed to train traffic that is actually seeking to go south from the Bass Lake Spur on the MNS tracks. 5. The proposed reroute of train traffic to the MNS line does not create a freight rail single track corridor with significant right -of -way and safety measures incorporated between the track and adjacent properties. 6. The proposed reroute to MNS increase the potential for additional future rail traffic through St. Louis Park per the Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan, with associated negative impacts on the community. 7. The conditions in the 10 -070 City Council Resolution for rerouting freight rail traffic from the Kenilworth Corridor to the MNS rail line in St. Louis Park have not been met. NOW, THEREFORE IT BE RESOLVED, by the City Council that the City of St. Louis Park hereby: 1. Supports the implementation of the Southwest Transitway LRT project; and, 2. Continues to support the May 23, 2001 Railroad Task Force Recommendations adopted by the City Council October 21, 2001; and, 3. Continues to support the July 6, 2010 City Council Resolution; and, 4. Supports the rerouting of TCW coal and other trains to western Minnesota in any case; and Resolution No. 11 -058 -3- 5. Supports all measures to eliminate the switching wye; and Opposes the rerouting of freight rail traffic from the Kenilworth corridor to St. Louis Park because the conditions of City Council Resolution 10 -070 have not been met. inistration: Adopted by the ��-ity Council May 31, 2011 City Attest: -�, fzt City Clerk J T� p Ma I MINUTES Regular Meeting of the Heritage Preservation Board Tuesday, May 10, 2011, 7:00 PM Edina Community Room 4801 50th Street -West MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Joel Stegner, Chris Rofidal, Jean Reiikamp Larson, Ross Davis, David'Anger; Terry Ahistrom, Bob Schwartzbauer, Claudia Carr, Colleen Curran and Lauren Thorson MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: OTHERS PRESENT: Katherine McLellan Joyce Repya, Associate Planner Robert Vogel, Preservation Consultant Open House — Cahill School & Grange Hall 5:00 — 7:00 p.m. prior to the meeting I. CALL TO ORDER 7 :00 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Chair Joel Stegner, and members Rofidal, Rehkamp Larson, Davis, Schwartzbauer, Carr, Curran, Anger, Ahlstrom and Thorson III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by Member Rofidal and seconded by. Member Schwartzbauer approving the meeting agenda. All voted aye. The motion carried. IV. MINUTES APPROVED — REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 12,1011 Motion was made. by Member Rofidal and seconded by Member Rehkamp,Larson approving ther minutes from the regular meeting of April 12, 2011. All voted aye. The motion carried. V. REPORTSIRECOMMENDAT1 NS A. H -11 -2 'Certificate of Appropriateness - 4623 Casco Avenue Planner Repya reported that the subject property is located on the east side of the 4600 block of Casco Avenue. The existing Tudor Revival style home was constructed in 1928 and currently has a 2 -car attached garage accessed by a driveway on the north side of the property. The subject request involves converting the attached garage to living space and building a new 440 square foot detached garage in the northeast corner of the rear yard; providing a 3.5 and3.6 foot setback from the side and rear lot lines. A new curb cut will not be required since the Minutes Heritage Preservation Board May 10, 2011 proposed garage will be accessed by the existing driveway. The proposed 2 -stall detached garage is designed to complement the Tudor Revival architectural style of the home with stucco clad walls, a designer overhead door and an asphalt shingled roof. Attention to detail is demonstrated on all elevations. A privacy fence abuts the structure on the north and east sides. The height of the garage is shown to be 17.6 feet at the highest peak which is 1.4 feet higher than the average 17.23 foot height of the surrounding detached garages. The height at the mid -point of the gable is shown to be 13.4', and a height of 8.25' is provided at the eave line. The ridge line is shown to be 23' in length. The plans for conversion of the attached garage to living space demonstrate two -story, 384.75 square feet of living space, with an open porch on the north side of the second story. Preservation Consultant Robert Vogel reviewed the plans and provided a report which stated that the COA application describes a new detached garage that is consistent with the design review guidelines presented in the district plan of treatment. The existing garage is not historically or architecturally significant and demolition will not have any adverse effect on the subject property or surrounding historic homes. The added that proposed new garage, if built according to the plans presented, would match the character of the historic house and be compatible with it in size, scale, massing, and material; it would also be compatible with the character of the neighborhood as a whole. Therefore, I recommend approval of the COA with the usual conditions. Regarding the addition to the rear of the home that is visible from the front street, Vogel stated that the plans demonstrate an addition that meets the general standards for historic preservation projects (i.e., the Secretary of the Interior's standards and guidelines for the treatment of historic properties). The Tudor style dwelling lacks individual historical significance but is considered a contributing heritage preservation resource in the district. No portions or features of the property which are significant to its historical and architectural values will be removed or destroyed: the proposed alteration will not, in my opinion, affect the historical and architectural integrity of the house, adjacent historic homes, or the neighborhood. As with the new garage, the design for the structural addition appears to treat the heritage resource with sensitivity and satisfies all of the relevant requirements of the district plan of treatment. Planner Repya concluded that Staff concurs with Consultant Vogel's recommendation to approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the new garage and addition, stating that the plans are not unlike those previously reviewed for homes in the Country Club District, and will enhance both the subject property as well as the neighborhood at large. Also, the proposed plans clearly demonstrate the homeowner's desire to provide for a more livable home and rear yard. Ms Repya added that the recommendation for approval is subject to the plans presented, and a condition that a year built (2011) plaque or sign is placed on the new detached garage. Findings supporting the approval recommendation include: • The plans provided with the subject request clearly illustrate the scale and scope of the project. • The information provided supporting the subject Certificate of Appropriateness meets the Minutes Heritage Preservation Board May 10, 2011 requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and the Country Club District Plan of Treatment. Board Comments Member Rehkamp Larson pointed out that the height of the proposed garage is shown to be in excess of what would be allowed using the formula of no taller than 10% over the average heights of surrounding detached garages. She added that she saw no reason that the new garage would not be designed to meet the established criteria. Member Rofidal questioned the exterior materials proposed for the structure noting that adding wood timbering to the gable end above the overhead door would tie the garage into the architecture of the home. Addressing the plans provided for the addition to the home that would be visible from the street, the Board expressed frustration with the representation - noting that they only received a copy of the addition, and they need to see the addition in relation to the existing home. They added that photographs of the sides of the home viewed from the street would also assist them in visualizing the addition to the home. Homeowner Comments Jeff Gisselbeck explained that he grew up in the Country Club District and appreciates the importance of design that is in keeping with the historic homes and its surroundings. He pointed out that his contractor provided the plans that the Board was reviewing; however he was the one who met with Planner Repya in preparation for the meeting. He added that he would be happy to provide any information the Board requests. Staff Comments Planner Repya commended Mr. Gisselbeck for his work in preparing the materials for the meeting. Usually, a contractor or architect handles the COA process for a client, and Mr. Gisselbeck was left in the middle attempting to convey information between his contractor and the city. Motion & Vote Following a brief discussion, the Board agreed that they did not have sufficient information to make a good decision, and if the homeowner was agreeable, they would prefer to table the item to a future meeting to allow the submission of the following additional information: 1. The addition shown in relationship to the house with 'an entire north and south elevation of the home & addition. 2. Photographs of the home taken from the street on the north as south elevations, as well as a photo or the rear of the home. 3. A redesigned garage with a height no taller than 17'2 %"which would be the maximum height using the established formula set out in the district's plan of treatment. 4. A garage plan that demonstrates all details to scale to include the louvered gable vent and additional wood trim. 5. All plans must be final Mr. Gisselbeck agreed that rather than the Board denying his request, he would prefer the item Minutes Heritage Preservation Board May 10, 2011 be tabled to a future meeting, affording him the opportunity to provide the requested information. A brief discussion ensued, after which the Board agreed to a special meeting on Tuesday, May 17`", (next week) after the work session with the City Council. Mr. Gisselbeck agreed that the date and time was agreeable with him. No formal action was taken B. H -11 -3 Certificate of Appropriateness - Cahill School /Grange Hall Planner Repya reported that last summer the Edina Historical Society (EHS) began a day camp program housed in the Cahill School and Grange Hall. At the end of the session, the EHS determined that the lack of air conditioning in the buildings made the experience uncomfortable. In September 2010, Park Director, John Keprios requested an opinion regarding whether or not the addition of air conditioning would be appropriate for the buildings. Robert Vogel was asked to opine on the subject - he provided the following response dated October 4, 2010: "From the perspective of the standards for rehabilitation of historic buildings, installation of AC would be appropriate, provided that the outdoor compressor is located in an inconspicuous place and the distinguishing original architectural qualities and historic character of the property (both the Cahill School and the Grange Hall) is preserved intact. The historic buildings need to be treated with sensitivity and no historic fabric (such as siding) should be destroyed. The Secretary of the Interior's standards for rehabilitation include guidelines for "necessary" mechanical systems: (1) they should be installed in areas that will require the least possible alteration to the structural integrity and physical appearance of the historic building, (2) vertical runs of ducts, pipes, etc. should be installed in closets, service rooms, and wall cavities (unless making them "invisible" requires the removal of historic fabric); and (3) code requirements should be complied with in such a manner that the essential character of the building is preserved intact. Air conditioning will significantly alter the sense of time and place that the schoolhouse is attempting to convey — I would recommend investigating alternatives to mechanical AC systems, including early air - cooling systems that relied upon fans and ventilation systems, before a decision is made to install air conditioning." Upon conveying Mr. Vogel's opinion, I made it clear that if the EHS wanted to pursue the installation of an air conditioning system, a Certificate of Appropriateness would be required. Apparently, the EHS was in the process of gathering information to submit with a request for a Certificate of Appropriateness, when somehow, wires got crossed and the air conditioning was installed in the Grange Hall without the required HPB review (installation of AC in the Cahill School was delayed because it must be coincide with the replacement of the furnace scheduled for later this spring. Even though the installation was completed in the Grange Hall without a Certificate of Appropriateness, the project must still be approved by the HPB. Consideration should be made for the installation of air conditioning in both the Grange Hall and the Cahill School. When evaluating the project, it is within the purview of the HPB to require changes to the installation which may be deemed appropriate, to include screening of the compressor units from all property lines, or even removal of the units. Minutes Heritage Preservation Board May 10, 2011 Bob Kojetin, representing the Edina Historical Society explained that he ordered the installation of the air conditioning unit for the Grange Hall because the summer program will be starting soon and they wanted to be sure that the building would be cooled in time. A brief discussion ensued among the Board regarding the need to ensure that the City does not issue building permits for the Cahill School or Grange Hall unless a Certificate of Appropriateness is in the file. Member Rehkamp Larson observed that the Grange Hall compressor on the north side of the building is visible from Grange Road and should be screened from view. Member Rehkamp Larson then moved approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness to install central air conditioning in the Grange Hall and Cahill School subject to the compressor units being screened with historically significant materials to be approved by Planner Repya. Member Carr seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. After the vote, Member Rofidal stated that he was disappointed that the Historical Society did not come to the HPB for the Certificate of Appropriateness prior to having the air condition unit installed in the Grange Hall. He added that Consultant Vogel suggested that other options for cooling the buildings be explored, yet it doesn't appear that the research was done. Board members agreed with Member Rofidal pointing out that in the future, the Historical Society must honor the Certificate of Appropriateness process. Chairman Stegner observed that Tupa Park where the Cahill School and Grange Hall stand doesn't appear to be very well maintained. Considering that the historic park is adjacent to City Hall, one would expect the landscaping to be on par with that of City Hall. He added that the park is not an optimal resource as it stands today, and wondered if improving the landscaping and adding picnic tables and park benches might not provide for a more inviting environment. Planner Repya stated that she would share Mr. Stegner's comments with the Park Director. C. White Oaks Neighborhood Planner Repya reported that since the April meeting, a representative from the White Oaks neighborhood has expressed the concern of several neighbors regarding the recent influx of remodeling and new construction of homes in their area. The neighbors wondered if a district landmark designation might not provide some protection. Ms. Repya pointed out that the Heritage Preservation Board would need to direct Robert Vogel to undertake a study of the area to determine if the area qualified for a district landmark designation, and if so, how it would be structured and managed. Cheryl Appeldom, 4703 Townes Road, President of the White Oaks Improvement Association thanked the Board for allowing her the opportunity to discuss the history of her neighborhood and recent building activity that has been taking place. Due to a tornado warning, the meeting moved to the basement of the Police Department. Ms. Appeldorn continued by explaining the unique aspects of White Oaks with its curving streets, large lots, preserved wetlands and large concentration of 150 year old bur oak trees. She also provided a brief history of the White Oaks Improvement Association, which in 1940, Minutes Heritage Preservation Board May 10, 2011 acquired title to a 3.5 acre meadow circled by Meadow Road and West 48th Street — these eight lots came with a permanent deed restriction which stated that the property "shall not be used for home building or other development except park purposes". Also in 1940, the Village of Edina was deeded a 1.5 acre wooded marsh near the Sunnyside entrance with the stipulation that the parcel be kept in a permanent natural state. Ms. Appeldorn pointed out that since the Country Club District received its landmark designation in 2003, preventing the teardown of the historic homes, there has been an increased amount of teardown and new construction of homes in the White Oaks neighborhood. While the neighbors are not against teardowns, there is concern that the new and revised homes have not been consistent with the White Oaks character. Ms. Appeldorn concluded that in its early days, White Oaks underwent a great deal of forethought and planning to ensure that areas natural topography and mature trees were respected, and the neighbors want to ensure that any new construction respect that history. The Board thanked Ms. Appeldorn for her presentation, agreeing that White Oaks did indeed have a unique history. Discussion ensued regarding the potential for a district landmark designation. Robert Vogel commented that a district landmark designation like the Country Club District's would be difficult to apply to other neighborhoods in the City because there is no other neighborhood with a similar development history. He added that further research of the White Oaks neighborhood would be necessary to make a substantiated evaluation. Although a district designation might not be practical, perhaps there are alternatives to a district designation that could address the divergent preservation aspects of neighborhoods in the city. Discussion ensued regarding the desire to walk the White Oaks area to gain a better understanding of the neighborhood. Ms. Appeldorn stated that she would be happy to lead the HPB on a tour. A tentative tour date of July 12th prior to the regular meeting of the HPB was discussed. Planner Repya agreed to coordinate the date and time with Ms. Appeldorn and report back to the Board. Following a brief discussion, the Board thanked Ms. Appeldorn for sharing the history of White Oaks - agreeing that the history is indeed unique, and reiterating their interest in walking the neighborhood. D. Preparation —Joint Meeting with City Council — 511712011 Addressing the.agenda for the upcoming work session with the City Council, the Board agreed to three main topics of discussion: 1. Southdale Center — Consider the cultural value of remaining original elements in the Garden Court in ongoing discussion with Center ownership regarding their upgrading plans. 2. Neighborhoods — Identification and preservation of overall character and outstanding heritage elements. 3. Board Performance & Communication — Factors that promote exceptional performance, i.e. board composition, member involvement, and communications that lead to greater sensitivity to board concerns in the city and community. In addition to the discussion items, the Board agreed to provide the following background information: • Minutes Heritage Preservation Board May 10, 2011 1. HPB accomplishments for 2010 2. HPB 2011 work plan and goals & objectives Lastly, it was agreed to include the following current initiatives of the Board: 1. State Historical Society recently approved a Certified Local Government (CLG) grant for $6,000 to fund the heritage landmark designation of six Momingside bungalow properties. 2. The following neighborhood walking tours are scheduled for this coming summer /fall: • White Oaks • West Minneapolis Heights • Community Education class focusing on preservation of older homes E. Historic House Tours /Historic Homeowner Workshop Historic House Tour — Mr. Vogel explained that historic house tours have been successful in other communities and he was wondering if there was interest in providing one in Edina. The Board briefly discussed the issue and agreed that it might be difficult to find homeowners willing to open their homes to the public, citing the struggles experienced by the home tours offered at Christmas time. The Board agreed that they would rather focus their efforts on updating the tours of the City currently underway with the Edina Historical Society. Historic Homeowner Workshop - Consultant Vogel explained that in keeping with the Board's goal of providing educational opportunities relative to heritage preservation, his firm would be willing to offer an historic home workshop at no cost to the city. Mr. Vogel explained that they have presented such classes for other communities with great success. The Board found Mr. Vogel's offer very intriguing, and asked if he could offer samples of the materials used in the classes. Discussion ensued regarding the potential for partnering with the Edina Communication Education which would facilitate getting interested parties signed up for the class. Planner Repya agreed to work with Mr. Vogel to approach the Community Education office regarding offering a class this fall /winter. F. Heritage Resource Disaster Plan Mr. Vogel explained that his firm has provided Heritage Resource Disaster Plans for other communities they represent, and he encouraged the Board consider the adoption of such a plan. He provided a copy of the disaster plan commissioned by the City of Newport as an example which provides direction for the emergency responders regarding how to accurately address the protection of historic properties. Following a brief discussion, the Board agreed that if such a plan were to be undertaken, it would need to dovetail with Edina's current emergency management procedures, and not be a standalone document. Planner Repya agreed to research the City's emergency management procedures and report back at a later date. 1. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS A. Council Connection — Delayed Action on Zoning Ordinance Amendment B. Proclamation — May 2011 Preservation Month Minutes Heritage Preservation Board May 10, 2011 C. Historic Walking tour — May 2e — Waveland Park & Morningside 2. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Member Rofidal announced to the Board that due to the busy travel schedule associated with his work, and his commitment to serve on the Grandview Small Area Study, he finds it necessary to resign from the Heritage Preservation Board. Rofidal pointed out that he is simply cutting his last term short since he would not be eligible for reappointment in February 2012. Board members, saddened to lose Rofidal, expressed their gratitude for the leadership he has provided while serving on the HPB, and wished him the very best in the future. 3. STAFF COMMENTS 4. NEXT MEETING DATE June 14, 2011 5. ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 9:35 pm Respectfully submitted, Joyce Repya ri s MINUTES SPECIAL Meeting of the Heritage Preservation Board Tuesday, May 17, 2011, 7:00 PM Edina Community Room 4801 50th Street West MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Joel Stegner, Jean Rehkamp Larson, Chris Rofidal, Ross Davis, David Anger, Terry Ahlstrom, Bob Schwartzbauer, and Claudia Carr I. COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT: Certificates of Appropriateness (COA) A. H -11 -01 4623 Casco Avenue — New Detached Garage & Addition Continued from May 10, 2011 The Board received the following information requested at the May 10th meeting when they continued consideration of the Certificate of Appropriateness request: 1. Plans of the north and south elevations of the existing home with the proposed addition. 2. Photographs of the existing north, south and rear elevations of the home. 3. A redesigned garage with a height of 17'23/4" which meets the maximum allowed by the established formula. 4. A garage plan that demonstrates all details to scale to include the louvered gable vent and additional wood trim. The homeowner, Jeff Gisselbeck was in attendance, however his contractor was not. The Board discussed the additional information requested for the proposed new garage and addition to the rear of the home. It was agreed that the lowering of the garage peak and addition of wood trim to the front gable end addressed concerns they had expressed at the earlier meeting. Member Rehkamp Larson questioned the ability to make some minor changes to the plan; however the homeowner was unable to respond as to whether those changes would be doable. The Board all agreed that in the future, a contractor /architect should be required to attend the meetings with the homeowner to address any technical questions the Board may have. The Board also noted that had the contractor attended the first meeting, perhaps the request could have been completed at that time and not held over to a special meeting. Following a brief discussion Member Schwartzbauer moved approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness request to construct a new detached garage and convert an existing attached garage to living space subject to the final plans presented and a year built plaque be placed on the new garage. Member Davis seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. Addressing the questions that arose with the subject request, Member Rehkamp Larson offered to compile a draft list of enhancements for situations that could enhance a project when an addition to a house creates very long side walls. The Board agreed that since this issue has Minutes - Special Meeting Heritage Preservation Board May 17, 2011 arisen quite frequently with past projects, and they looked forward to future clarification of the issue. II. OTHER BUSINESS: None III. ADJOURNMENT: 7:15 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Joyce Repya ,P MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner SUBJECT: FINAL FY2011 CDBG (Community Development Block Grant) Budget DATE: June 13, 2011 HUD has released the final' FY2011 CDBG grant award amount for Hennepin County which is slightly. less ($9,238) than the previously reported amount based on the previous projected 169/0 reduction'. Attached is 'a chart comparing the preliminary and final allocations for each Hennepin County community; as well as Edina's revised 2011 CDBG budget which reflects an additional $615 reduction in allocated funds. The agencies depending on CDBG funding from the City of Edina have been advised of the ,changes. City Name: EDINA Date: June 13, 2011 FINAL CDBG FY2011 Project Budgets 2010 4/18/2011 6/13/2011 Project Name: Original Budget New Budget 2010 Edina Allotment $173,786 $145,980 PUBLIC SERVICES: (15 %) $26,067 $21,897 Sr. Community Services - H.O.M.E. $17,789 $14,943 Community Action Partnership Sub. Henn. $5,624 $4,724 HOME Line $2,654 $2,230 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: $147,719 $124,083 West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust $82,000 $68,869 Rehabilitation of Private Property $65,719 $55,214 Total: April 18, 2011 (New total must be 16% less than original, round to nearest 1$) FINAL BUDGET $145,365 LESS $615 $21,805 $14,880 $4,700 $2,225 $123,560 $68,575 $54,985 lune 2011 (Less additional .421 %) Hennepin County -FINAL 2011 CDBG Allocation Community Final Allocation Preliminary Allocation with 16% reduction Funding Loss Brooklyn Center $170,294 $171,014 , $720 Brookl n Park $341,1.51 $342,593 $1,442 Crystal $89,145 $89.522 $377 Edina $145,365 $145,980 $615 Hopkins $102,482 $102,915 $433 Maple Grove $140,793 $141,388 $595 New Hoe $98,002 $98.416 $414 Richfield $178,047 $178,800 $753 St. Louis Park $186,055 $186.842 $787 Subtotal $1 ,451,334 $1 457 470 $6,136 Consolidated Pool $450,975 $452,882 $1,907 Community Allocation Total $1,902,309 1,910,352 $8,043 ennepin County Administration $2841258, 285,453 $1,195 County Entitlement Total $9,238 . H: \My Documents \cdbg\2011 CDBG \FINAL Urban HC 2011 Activity by Community (2).xis MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION HELD AT CITY HALL MAY 12,`2011 7:05 P:M. I. Call to Order Chair Latham called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Commissioners Gubrud, Kata, Kostuch, Paterlini; Risser, Sierks, Thompson, Tucker, Zarrin, and Chair Latham. Absent: Commissioners lyer and Pronove Staff Present: Secretary Timm III. Approval of Meeting Agenda 'Agenda was approved as written. IV. Adoption of Consent Agenda. Motion made. by Commissioner Sierks and seconded by Commissioner Gubrud approving the consent agenda. V. Community Comment. No one appeared for comment. VI. Report/Recommendations A. Motion made by Commissioner Risser and seconded by Commissioner Sierks to approve Laura Eaton to the Air Quality Working Group. Motion carried unanimously. Motion made.by Cornmissioner Sierks.and seconded by Commissioner Gubrud to approve. Bradley Hanson to the Energy Working Group. Motion carried unanimously. Motion.made by Commissioner Gubrud and seconded by Commissioner Thompson to remove Bob Genovese and Wendy Morris from the Education and Outreach Working Group. Motion carried unanimously.. B. Chair Latham reported on the work session with City Council May 3, 2011. She explained that the Commissions would have a standardized agenda, minutes and by -laws. The meeting also included discussions on the filming of meetings, establishing Working Groups, Task Forces and Commission Orientations. , C. Chair Latham gave and overview of the outline for City Ordinances and Recommendations. D. Commissioner..Risser reported on the Air Quality Working Group. Commissioner Risser will ask Staff Liaison, Jesse.Struve.to get informatiob and a price on "No Idling" signs. Commissioner Risser gave a report on the MNDOT Workshop she attended April 21, 2011. E. Chair Latham reviewed the proposed. press release regarding the July 31, 2011, Eco Yard and Garden Tour: with commissioners. The press release was approved with some minor revisions. F. Chair Latham reviewed the Green Corps Intern application submittal with.commissioners. She asked that any commissioner with suggestions for intern projects contact Jesse Struve before June 1, 2011. G. There was a discussion about the content of the EEC's part on the.website. Jennifer Bennerotte . will conduct meetings on the website to get input. Chair Latham appointed Commissioner Paterlini to represent the EEC at the meetings. Commissioner Paterlini made a motion seconded by Commissioner Zarrin to remove SageSteps.com from consideration for adding to the EEC's website. Motion carried unanimously. H. At this time the Edina portion of the GreenStep Cities website was reviewed on the internet. Chair Latham did the input and asked the commissioners to take time to review her entries. I. There was no report by the Energy Working Group. J. Commissioner Kostuch gave an update regarding the Procurement Policy. K. Commissioner Paterlini will send invitations to the new commissioners to join the Google Groups. L. Commissioner Thompson recommended that EEC have a unit in the Edina 4th of july parade and made a motion to use "Connecting Our Neighborhoods" as the theme of the 4th of july Parade entry for EEC. Commissioner Tucker seconded. Motion carried unanimously. M. The Education and Outreach Working Group prepared a survey for Edina Public School Principals for completion. Commissioner Thompson shared the survey with Commissioners. There was a discussion about the questions and how to simplify the survey. Commissioner Thompson made a motion seconded by Commissioner Paterlini to simplify the survey and then send the survey to the Edina Public School Principals at the end of the 2011 school year. Motion carried unanimously. N. Commissioner Tucker gave an update of the Water Quality Working Group. The Blue Star Assessment has been completed with a total of 61% points. They will identify areas in Edina that will help gain percentage points. 0. Chair Latham gave a Recycling and Solid Waste Working Group Report. She reported that the Group attended the League of Women Voters Meeting regarding organized haulers and also reported they will attend a tour of St Paul District Energy in June. VII. Correspondence and Petitions VIII. Chair and Commission Member Comments A. Chair Latham asked Secretary Timm to order commission badges for the Commissioners that did not have one. She will make a request through Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications Director. B. Chair Latham reminded the Commissioners that Vice Chair Paterlini would like to resign as Vice Chair and would like another commissioner to step into the role. This item was tabled to the June 2011 meeting. There being no further business on the Commission Agenda, Chair Latham declared the meeting adjourned at 9:27 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Jane M Timm Deputy City Clerk EDINA HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION TUESDAY, MARCH 22, 2011 7:00 PM — MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT Zack Antar John Cashmore Arnie Bigbee Meg Newell Daria Brosius Steve Winnick Lisa Finsness Jessi Kingston Bob Mayer Jan Seidman Russ Stanton CALL TO ORDER Chair Kingston called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED STAFF Susan Howl GUEST Ashle Briggs Horton Motion by Member Bigbee and seconded by Member Seidman approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Bigbee, Finsness, Kingston, Mayer, Seidman and Stanton Motion carried. MEETING MINUTES APPROVED Motion by Member Mayer and seconded by Member Bigbee approving the meeting minutes of February 22, 2011. Ayes: Bigbee, Finsness, Kingston, Mayer, Seidman and Stanton Motion carried. GUEST INTRODUCED Ashle Briggs Horton from the Edina Patch was introduced and welcomed. She was gathering information on three events: Reflections on Bullying on April 26th, Tom Oye Human Rights Award on April 28th, and the proposed Day of Remembrance on May 1St NEWLY- CREATED FUNDING PROCEDURE EXPLAINED Having met with the City Manager, Chair Kingston shared his recommendations for a newly- created funding procedure: • The City Council will establish a new working group entitled the Human Services Task Force. • This will begin with the following City Commissions appointing one of their members to serve on the Task Force: Community Health Committee, HRRC, Planning Commission, Energy & Environment Commission, Transportation Commission and Park Board. • The City Manager will provide staff support to the Human Services Task Force. • The Task Force will produce a recommendation for CDBG funding and human services funding. • These two recommendations will be approved by the City Manager before final approval by the City Council. • To accomplish this work, four meetings would be scheduled for the Task Force: - Evaluation of the RFP to be sent to providers currently funded and submitting an ad for the Sun - Current to solicit new requests - Hearing for the providers - Development of a draft human services budget - Presentation of the budget to the City Manager for evaluation Member Stanton indicated his interest in participating on the Task Force. "BIAS /HATE CRIME RESPONSE PLAN" REVIEWED It was noted that the City's legal counsel had reviewed and revised the Bias /Hate Crime Response Plan i last March. After the Commission's re- scrutiny of the Plan, Chair Kingston agreed to meet with the Police Chief for a refresher of the procedure and a view of the revisions. "DAYS OF REMEMBRANCE" PROCLAMATION AND EVENT PLANS DEVELOPED Due to a citizen bringing to the Mayor's attention, the designation of the Days of Remembrance from May 1st through May 81h by the United States Holocaust Memorial Council, encouragement came to Member Cashmore from the Mayor for HRRC to plan an event around this time. A proclamation was prepared by the Commission for the City Council's approval, which designates May is` through May 81h as the Days of Remembrance of the Victims of the Holocaust. The proclamation also designates Sunday, May 151, as the Day of Remembrance, at which time HRRC would host an open house and program at Edina City Hall. Motion by Member Bigbee and seconded by Member Finsness to forward the proclamation to the City Council for approval of the designation of the Days of Remembrance from May 1st through May 8th and for an HRRC event on May 1st designating the Day of Remembrance. Ayes: Bigbee, Finsness, Kingston, Mayer, Seidman and Stanton Motion carried. If the resolution is approved by the City Council, Chair Kingston and Member Seidman would assist Member Cashmore with the planning and preparation of the event on May 1st "TOM OYE HUMAN RIGHTS AWARD" RECIPIENT SELECTED After having reviewed the six nominations sent out to the Commissioners by Member Mayer, he asked for each Commissioner's ranking in order to determine the 2011 recipient of the Tom Oye Human Rights Award. Each nominee was required to have a strong interest in human rights and live or work in Edina. After Member Mayer made the determination upon compilation of the rankings, he announced that the 2011 recipient of the Tom Oye Award would be Rev. Dan Johnson. Dan has been a tireless advocate for human rights as he led his church toward becoming a "reconciling" church that openly welcomes and affirms the GLBT population. The presentation will be made at the Volunteer Awards Reception at Edinborough on April 28th. Candidates not selected in 2011 will automatically be considered again in 2012, along with new nominations. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MEETINGS DISCUSSED The Commissioners agreed that there should be more time on the meeting agendas for additional items. This topic will be discussed in May. DETAILS SHARED REGARDING "REFLECTIONS ON BULLYING" Member Finsness reported the following: • More groundwork was laid at the last meeting with Heather Haen Anderson and Members Finsness, Newell, and Brosius. • The official confirmation form for Ellen Kennedy to be on the panel will be developed and sent to her as soon as possible. • There will be four people on the panel. • The emcee will be Liz Collins from WCCO, and WCCO will cover the event. • Dick Crockett of the Edina Community Foundation will cover the cost of the food. • There will be a PSA on the Edina website. • The EdinaSecrets boxes will be in a number of locations for people to submit anonymous postcards. Member Seidman offered to help put the boxes together. • John offered to help with publicity. • HRRC Members are encouraged to invite their contacts to attend and to provide this information for Heather Haen Anderson. Member Antar will contact Jerry's about publicity in their turnaround, and he will also talk to the hockey coach regarding securing a Wild player as a celebrity. Reflections on Bullying will count as the April Commission Meeting. After the event, PSA's with the Police Chief could be created in order to educate the public. It would be helpful to advertise pertinent websites regarding bullying. "BEYOND DIVERSITY" WORKSHOP INFORMATION SHARED Member Finsness reported that she had recently attended the two -day "Beyond Diversity" workshop for School District personnel through WMEP. One of the themes was about raising the awareness of White privilege. 200 people were in attendance. The workshop was a step in the right direction in the continuum of learning. The Commission needs to be alert as to finding out what the next step will be. CITY OF EDINA TO HOST APRIL MEETING OF THE STATE LEAGUE OF HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSIONS Member Bigbee reminded the Commissioners that they are invited to attend the State League of Human Rights Commissions' April meeting in the Community Room of Edina City Hall on Saturday, April 30tH from noon to 3 PM. RSVP's are necessary, as a meal will be served. Member Bigbee is now a Board Member of the State League. MEETING ADJOURNED There being no further business on the Commission agenda, Chair Kingston declared the meeting adjourned at 8:35 PM. Respectfully submitted, Jessi Kingston, Chair Edina Human Rights & Relations Commission EDINA HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION "REFLECTIONS ON BULLYING" — CITY -WIDE DIALOGUE & EXHIBIT TUESDAY, APRIL 26, 2011 6:00 PM — FICK AUDITORIUM MEMBERS PRESENT STAFF Zack Antar Susan Howl Arnie Bigbee Daria Brosius John Cashmore Lisa Finsness Bob Mayer Meg Newell Jan Seidman Russ Stanton Steve Winnick "Reflections on Bullying" Event — Tuesday, April 26, 2011— Fick Auditorium How does a community begin to address bullying? Bullying, it happens so often, in so many places. It causes so much pain and is all too often is ignored. To address this insidious problem, the Human Rights and Relationship Commission (HRRC) chose bullying as their focus for 2011. To begin the discussion and to build awareness within the Edina community, the HRRC received support from the Edina Community Foundation to host an Edina Dialogue, "Reflections on Bullying: Creating a World Were Bullying Does Not Happen ". The HRRC also collaborated with the Gay Straight Alliance and the 212 leadership team, both from Edina High School, the Edina Resource Center, Connecting with Kids and the Edina Chamber of Commerce. On April 26, 2011, more than 150 people gathered at FICK auditorium in Edina High School for a light dinner to begin an Edina dialogue on Bullying. Citizens submitted anonymous postcards — "Edina Secrets" and essays sharing their thoughts and experience ... their reflections about bullying. The school library displayed books, the non - profit; " A World Without Genocide" shared program information. The main event opened with remarks from HRRC chair, Jessi Kingston and Mayor Jim Hovland and was moderated by Liz Collin from WCCO featured a movie produced by the Southern Poverty Law Center, "Bullied" — a true story about Jamie Nabozny- a teenager in Wisconsin whose bullying was ignored by school officials. Jaime took his case to court and won a judgment against several school administrators. Julie Herzog from PACER addressed the audience at the conclusion of the movie and EHS student, Abdisa Dawano shared a reading. The evening concluded with a guest panel: Dr. Ellen Kennedy, Rachael Pream Grenier, Rick Sansted, Koal Williams, and Chelese Ewart ...and powerful audience dialogue. Respectfully submitted, Lisa Finsness, Co -Chair "Reflections on Bullying" RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -70 SUPPORTING BIKE BOULEVARD GRANT FROM TRANSIT FOR LIVABLE COMMUNITIES INFORMATION ONLY WHEREAS, the City of Edina is committed to supporting the bicycling community by adopting a Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan in 2007; WHEREAS, the Transit for Livable Communities has granted the City of Edina a grant for bike boulevard in the City; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina is committed to the completion of a successful project; and WHEREAS, the Edina Transportation Commission will be conducting the public process for this project and will require additional time to ensure the best project possible; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council requests the Transit for Livable Communities grant additional t ADOPTED this 7th day of June, 2011. Attest: ri...", � r' r ebra A. Mange , City Jerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )S8 ) CERTIFICATE OF CLERK - — --l— I; the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 7, 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 1 -7 ' day of 20 f/ u City Clerk City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 -826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdinaxom TTY 952 -826 -0379