Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2011-08-03 COUNCIL MEETING
BIKE 4CA-0 EDINA Cityteadershlp ,U� )EDINA B I K E 7§ Work Session Purpose: To discuss past, present_ and future collaboration between the Bike Edina Task Force and the City Council. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. � , VZ S I K E EDINA Bicycle Friendly: Why It Matters. A refresher on the Bike Edina Task Force ( "BETF "). Quick history of the BETF and accomplishments in Edina. Current important bicycle infrastructure projects in Edina. BETF sponsored and supported events in Edina. Open Discussion: - The BETF and the Edina Transportation Commission ( "ETC") Bicycle Friendly: Why it matters • Personal Well Being •Recreation, Health— "Active Living" *Citizen Demand *Edina resident 2006 survey: Demand •State and local Policy •Edina Planning Commission objectives •Complete and Living Streets *Alternative Transportation *Property Value and Tax Base r) Bicycle Friendly America. �y uncK on any srare •/ to see 8FCs and BFBs Bike Edina Task Force • Vision: Edina is a progressive bicycle- C11 friendly community where citizens can integrate cycling into their daily lives. • Mission: To implement the approved City of Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan that supports all levels of bicyclists, connects key destinations including safe routes to schools, and integrates with the Twin Cities' regional bike network. N. . C� 91KE ED I NA r- Bike Edina Task Force • Collaborate with City Engineer Wayne Houle to pro - actively coordinate bicycle facilities and activities (e.g., Safe Routes to Schools, Bike Maps, bike parking, media outreach, etc.) • Promote safe biking through community outreach and education. Community liaison link the various City departments with the bicycling community Track local and national trends to__pj mote safe biking or to encourage the broader a op ion of bicycling as a form of exercise or as a method of commuting or other travel. Promote integration of appropriate city, state or national initiatives (e.g. Complete Streets) into Edina's planning for bicycling. Source: BETF Bylaws C� 5� S� W15-'K lam" �j II'� Task Force C- nINA �l BETF A�Co m0lishments City Management & Engineering First implementations of bike lanes. share the road. etc. Comprehensive Bike Plan ��. BK YCLE TR&%%P 4TA71ON PLMl C �, I Bike Walk VOO-1- 0 Ar Twin Cities &_Partne S��u ac N T N4 i N Nr- ,S"'r•n•ti ISI ©N 11'alli., SHIP 0\\ , o,)� .,r QY n $250K grant received vY' Bicycle Friendly Community,- , ti i nreeRzvers [ ARK DIS'TKIC;'I' '�e , vo �� 7 mo a� b IAJ Sv 3 ,rte 'b A network of standard streets plus primaryL vp @yOrD .\� 9 I KE „ sec `ndary, & regional bicycling routes ,r INA � � j) � - 6 'A w Plan Recommendations: Route Network The City of Edina Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan LEGEND � fFY.U, +FJUIf � SE:dw'ARY R': RM N4 PILL r tat; psi i FAGUP n KK saaa • PIIrom si>= + MASS U Am" aPAMS Y r: T bu ice' t�C`rJ, Fwd p�� 6G �o C Edina Bicycling Events. Education: —Safe Routes to Schools — Bike Rodeo - 4nk — Edina Skills Rides Lt's hruL— ICk&`(q C e `vj' v4tx Encouraement: g — Annual Bike to Work Event —Tour de Edina — Ride with the City Counci —,new 2011 Mayor & %�nc�. 0.CJ P` cc eec("j CJ F- 1 L J Current Protects $250,000 Grant: Transit for Livable Communities (TLC) - Non - motorized Pilot Prog. — 1 of 40 funded by TLC in Twin Cities in 2009 — 3 Edina Phases: 54t" St, Wooddale, Valley View — Connect NE Edina to SE Edina • NE Edina -- Pamela Park -- Cornelia Park-- Southdale • 2009 Prelim. Study &Cost Estimate: $266,000 — Phase I: 62 and Valley View Rd. — Action Request: Approve ETC Recommendation �1 d4 Proaosed Bike Boulevard 54t "- France /Wooddale /Valley View �ED!NA -T L Le 77 VI eui Po wr IE Phase 1: Highway 62 /Valley View Exit I O t- I i "-7- 1% Vo - Bike Walk Twin Cities —Grant Fall 2011 Installation of 50 Bike Racks O 1 3945 W 50 "' St Parking Location Map 2 3915W50thSt (1 of 2) 3 3906 W 50th St 90 4 3930 W 50th St 5 5036 France Ave S V1 80 6 3939 W 50th St 7 4916 France Ave S 8 3904 Sunnyside Rd _ 9 4388 France Ave 5 10 5013 Vernon Ave 11 4801 W 5011 St 12 7450 Metro Blvd Y u' J c c - 49 3! 10 lie O ODen Discussion Suggested Topics: 1. City leadership feedback 2. BETF and City Engineering notice & input timing 3. Bicycle friendly community status 4. BETF and ETC proper organizational structure 5. Community education, events, & outreach 6. Near term bicycle infrastructure projects w • -" r� y� s We Value Your Support! Together we are improving our community! 1 j !!, C> I am Susan Clark and I live with my family at 5812 West 61St Street in Edina. I am speaking in opposition to the Waters Project on their request for preliminary and final Plat /Subdivision approval and their Change Request Application to the approved Development Application of July 2010. The Neighborhood had worked long and hard to vet this Development Application back in 2010 because of the many concerns, including the big concern around parking. Many of you probably remember the public comments that were provided in the five hours of Public Hearing on June 30, 2010. The Preliminary Plat /Subdivision approval for the Waters Project was provided by the City Council at the February 17, 2010 City Council Meeting. This Preliminary Plat /Subdivision approval was in effect for one year from this date when it expired. Shelter Corporation allowed the Plat /Subdivision Application to lapse. On May 10, 2011, Shelter Corporation requested a Change to the Waters Development Application of July 17, 2010. They are requesting a reduction in parking of 39 spaces and a reduction of common space by 28 square feet to self -fund 7 affordable housing units. As of June 9, 2011, the Shelter Corporation filed a second Plat /Subdivision application for which they are requesting a preliminary and final approval at today's City Council Meeting. I would like to point out this $30 million development project has been materially misclassified in the zoning process. It is classified as a PRD -5 facility, a convalescent /nursing home that requires a valid license from the State of Minnesota. The Shelter Corporation cannot request such licensing from the State because there is currently a State moratorium on this licensing without a date certain as to when the moratorium will be lifted. Other Assisted Living facilities in Edina are classified as PSR -4. The Waters will be registered housing, that is Assisted Living, with services. Why then is the Waters project considered PRD -5? Could it be parking? The PRD -5 standard is less. The State of Minnesota does have criteria for registered housing i.e. Assisted Living/with services in Minnesota. To be registered as housing with services, 80% of the residents need to be 55 or older and 20% of the occupants can be younger. The State does not regulate such facilities. We are concerned that there is nothing in the State language nor Edina's zoning ordinances that would suggest the Waters would be required to so operate perpetually. How many people could actually live at the Waters under this zoning of PRD -5? Water's square footage numbers as provided by Mr. Teague on June 27, 2011: • 1 bedroom units — 67 units ( 800 -1,400 s.f.) , • 2 bedroom units — 30 units (1,200 —1,500 s.f.) • Memory & care units — 42 care units (450 -720 s.f.) The Edina Health Department was contacted about 2 months ago and we do have ordinances that cover number of occupants of dwelling units: • One occupant requires a minimum of 150 square feet and there must be at least 100 square feet for each added occupant. • The number of occupants cannot be based on the number of bedrooms. Page 2 — Susan Clark Summary With these assumptions we can presume that a one bedroom can house with at least 250 1. could house 2 people, and a two bedroom with at least 350 s.f. could house 3. You can see the square footage allows the number of residents to be larger than 169. Mr. Jay Jensen reported in 2010 that the Waters Senior Living of Edina had exceeded parking requirements for PRD -5 by 40% with these 39 spaces. The project received approval last July with these spaces. Now the Waters wants to take those parking spaces away. Is this fair and reasonable? We think not. The developer, Shelter Corporation, and the City say that a maximum of 169 people will live at the Waters; meaning 20 %, or 33, of the residents can be under 55. The City was informed in early 2010 that 20% of the people at the Colony in Eden Prairie are still working. Parking requirements for senior citizen housing requires 0.5 car stall per senior. The requirement for non - seniors is more stalls per apartment unit. If the Waters has non - seniors living there, should parking be 1.75 times the number of non - seniors? This zoning misclassification has legal risks for the City and Edina residents as to the building use and the required parking. There are many questions to be answered about this parking change and the parking requirements as a result of the error in the zoning of the Development Application in July 2010. Until the proper zoning classification is applied and the parking requirements are determined based upon the actual use, we respectfully request you to vote NO to the plat /subdivision application and the Development Application Change Request. Water's square footage numbers as provided by Mr. Teague on June 27, 2011: - 1 bedroom units — 67 units (800 -1,400 s.f.) - 2 bedroom units — 30 units (1,200 -1,500 s.f.) - Memory &care units — 42 care units (450- 720 s.f.) One occupant requires a minimum of 150 square feet and there must be at least 100 square feet for each added occupant. The number of occupants cannot be based on the number of bedrooms. Assume a one bedroom with at least 250 s.f. could house 2 people, a two bedroom with at least 350 s.f. could house 3, then 1 *45 =45 2 *22 =44 2 *25 =50 3 *5 =15 1 *42=42 Total= 196 AGENDA CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMMUNITY ROOM AUGUST 3, 2011 5:30 P.M. Call To Order II. Introductions III. BETF: Who We Are IV. Review BETF Accomplishments And Activities From Previous Year V. Plans For The Future [TLC Grant, Bicycle Friendly Community, Nine Mile Creek, Bike Parking Grant, Safe Routes To School, Complete Streets /Living Streets] VI. Working Relationship Between BETF And City Of Edina VII. Role of BETF in the Future VIII. Adjournment The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927- 886172 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Wed Aug 3 Work Session With — Bike Edina Task Force Wed Aug 3 Regular Council Meeting Mon Aug 15 Joint Meeting With Edina School Board Tues Aug 16 Work Session — Budget Review Tues Aug 16 Regular Council Meeting Tues Aug 23 Closed Council Meeting — Six Month Review City Manager Tues Aug 30 Work Session With Park Board -Nat'l Golf Foundation Rep. Mon Sept 5 LABOR DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Sept 6 Work Session — Budget Review Tues Sept 6 Regular Meeting !s Sept 20 Work Session With Energy & Environment Commission .es Sept 20 Regular Meeting Tues Oct 4 Work Session — Human Services Task Force Funding Rec Tues Oct 4 Regular Meeting Tues Oct 18 Work Session — Review Proposal City Economic Dev. & Svc. Tues Oct 18 Regular Meeting 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5;30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS >' AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS AUGUST 3, 2011 7:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Meeting of July 19, 2011 and Work Session of July 19, 2011 B. Receive Payment Of Claims As Per: Pre -List Dated 7/21/2011, TOTAL $696,045.08; Pre - List Dated, 7/28/2011, TOTAL $2,080,980.75 C. Traffic Safety Committee Report of July 6, 2011 D. Agreement With Waldorf Nevens Cleaners E. Contract PK 11 -3PK, 2011 Parking Lot Improvements V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS Agenda/Edina City Council August 3, 2011 Page 2 VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: • Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. • In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. Public Hearing: Amended Site Plan and Preliminary and Final Plat, Waters Senior Convalescent Home Project, 6200 Colonial Way— Resolution No. 2011 -74 & Resolution 2011 -75 (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve) VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speaks on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VIII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Resolution No. 2011 -76 Accepting Various Donations B. Public Facility Inventory and Feasibility Study Of An Indoor Athletic Facility C. Edina Transportation Commission Recommendation for Transit for Livable Communities — Bike Boulevard Grant D. Edina Energy and Environment Commissions Recommendation for Solar Panel Project E. Edina Transportation commission Recommendation For France Avenue Corridor J Wed Wed Mon Tues Tues Tues Tues Mon Tues Tues Tues es .es Tues Tues Tues Agenda /Edina City Council August 3, 2011 Page 3 IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS XI. MANAGER'S COMMENTS XII. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952 - 927 - 886172 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Aug 3 Work Session With — Bike Edina Task Force Aug 3 Regular Council Meeting Aug 15 Joint Meeting With Edina School Board Aug 16 Work Session — Budget Review Aug 16 Regular Council Meeting Aug 23 Closed Council Meeting — Six Month Review City Manager Aug 30 Work Session With Park Board -Nat'l Golf Foundation Rep. Sept 5 LABOR DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Sept 6 Work Session — Budget Review Sept 6 Regular Meeting Sept 20 Work Session With Energy & Environment Commission Sept 20 Regular Meeting Oct 4 Work Session — Human Services Task Force Funding Rec Oct 4 Regular Meeting Oct 18 Work Session — Review Proposal City Economic Dev. & Svc. Oct 18 Regular Meeting 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5;30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JULY 19, 2011 7:00 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Ill. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the consent agenda as follows: IV.A. Approve regular and work session meeting minutes of July 5, 2011. IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated July 7, 2011, and consisting of 40 pages; General Fund $99,945.55; Communications Fund $4,950.13; Police Special Revenue $2,689.97; Working Capital Fund $11,225.19; Equipment Replacement Fund $196.65; Art Center Fund $15,102.79; Golf Dome Fund $1,296.41; Aquatic Center Fund $32510.44; Golf Course Fund $23,486.92; Ice Arena Fund $16,953.74; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $22,299.46; Liquor Fund $262,423.60; Utility Fund $174,453.91; Storm Sewer Fund $3,692.29; PSTF Agency Fund $4,130.90; TOTAL $675.357.95 and for approval of payment of claims dated July 14, 2011, and consisting of 28 pages; General Fund $350,473.38; Communications Fund $6,312.47; Police Special Revenue $6,064.94; Working Capital Fund $76,604.87; Equipment Replacement Fund $15,088.12; Art Center Fund $46.03; Aquatic Center Fund $13,190.02; Golf Course Fund $37,043.35; Ice Arena Fund $28,015.26; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $12,988.92; Liquor Fund $202,892.53; Utility Fund $399,555.46; Storm Sewer Fund $5,863.33; PSTF Agency Fund $2,408.66; Payroll Fund $5,032.19; TOTAL $1,161,579.53; and, Credit Card Transactions dated May 26 — June 27, 2011; TOTAL $13,905.96. IV.C. Adopt Resolution No. 2011 -71, Approving Lot Division at 4213 Morningside Road and 4212 Branson Street for Randy Doroff. IV.D. Contract, No. ENG 11 -11, Maloney Avenue Reconstruction, awarding bid to the recommended lower bidder, Midwest Asphalt Corporation at $261,115.40. IV.E. Request to Purchase: Well No. 4 Pumping Facility Maintenance, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, E.H. Renner & Sons at $44,296.00. IV.F. Request to Purchase: Emergency Sanitary Sewer Repair, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Minger Construction, Inc. at $47,500.00. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V.A. DECISION RESOURCES PRESENTATION MADE — 2011 QUALITY OF LIFE SURVEY Manager Neal reviewed the process I-RdP f by which the City determined to conduct a Quality of Life Survey. Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /July 19, 2011 ,. Dr. William Morris, Decision Resources, Ltd. presented the results of the 2011 Quality of Life Survey of 400 households. Dr. Morris described the demographic changes that had taken place in Edina since the last Quality of Life Survey in 1999 survey. 'He reported that most of the residents contacted agreed to participate in the survey, and they expressed a very high degree of satisfaction with the quality of life in Edina, general direction of the City, City Services and City staff. Dr. Morris noted the percentages of respondents rating the quality of life in Edina as excellent or good were the highest found in any of over 100 cities surveyed by Decision Resources. He Feperted Fesidents agaiA Fespended with high ^ nta^^° Felating te the quality of life iR EdiRa, satisfar-Aien %A.oith the geneFa direr-VeR Af the City, seMees, and staff, yed Areas that ranked ',,..,, ,.., rated ter taX . .. istane; Areas in which respondents expressed less satisfaction included increased perception of property taxes as high, lack of redevelopment in the Southdale area; street repairs; taste of the drinking water s in two quadrants; high number of condominiums /townhouses; and, need for affordable starter houses. Dr. Morris indicated that when Decision Resources first opened in 1983, it called on city managers to prospect potential business and the Edina City Manager indicated that Edina did not need a Quality of Life Survey because it defined the quality of life. Then, in 1999, former Manager Gordon Hughes invited Decision Resources to conduct a survey. The results of that survey found there was some truth to the previous manager's statement with 81% rating the quality of life to be excellent. This time the survey found corroborating evidence that Edina was the "pace setter" for establishing quality of life. The Council discussed the survey and asked questions of Dr. Morris. With regard to regularity of conducting a survey, Dr. Morris recommended communities undergoing growth to survey every two years with more stable communities such as Edina to survey every three to four years. The r.,unr_-il t►,apkpd th„ the positive Fespenses. The Council thanked Dr. Morris and Decision Resources and Edina residents for their participation in the survey. Council members expressed their appreciation for residents' positive responses. The Council recognized staff as being highly regarded and thanked them for the great job they do for the City. Support was expressed for conducting a community survey every three to four years so results could be used, in conjunction with other data, for budget analysis. Vt. PUBLIC HEARING HELD VI.A. SITE PLAN AMENDMENT APPROVED — EBENEZER YORK ASSISTED LIVING LLC — 3451 PARKLAWN AVENUE —RESOLUTION NO. 2011-72 ADOPTED Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Planning Director Presentation Planning Director Teague presented the request of the Ebenezer Society to amend its approved site plan for a 76 -unit, 4 -story senior housing project at 3451 Parklawn Avenue to relocate an existing "air cooler" air conditioning unit to the east side of the recently constructed building. It was noted this air conditioning unit had not been identified on the submitted site or building plans. Staff had recommended 8 -foot tall arborvitaes; however, the Planning Commission recommended 10 -foot tall arborvitae. Mr. Teague advised the Planning Commission recommended approval, on a 6 -1 -1 vote, subject to findings and conditions as set forth in the staff report dated June 29, 2011. The Council noted the current location was near an existing chiller and suggested a requirement that both be screened. Mr. Teague explained the MPCA measures noise at the property line and the air conditioner at its current location exceeded the MPCA standards for decibel levels. Therefore, Staff recommended requiring testing by an acoustical engineer at the new location to assure it met the MPCA's threshold. Should the decibel level exceed MPCA standards at the new location, the proponent would be required to install sound attenuation equipment. Mr. Teague added the installation would raise the unit's height by 30 inches. The Council asked how close residents would be to the proposed location. It was indicated the Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /July 19, 2011 closest resident was 30 feet from the current location, and the closest resident would be 100 feet from the proposed location. The Council noted the original landscaping plan was fairly extensive and discussed the option of requiring a berm. Mr. Teague advised that underground utilities would provide some challenges limiting the installation of a berm. Proponent Presentation Kyle Klawitter, Walker and Associates, representing York Gardens, assured the Council this was not an intentional or willful act on the part of the project team. The project team first became aware of the situation when complaints were received from residents and shortly thereafter started to work on solutions in conjunction with City staff. Sine e Once the proponent realized that a variance was not a good solution, they it decided the solution would be to move the air conditioner to the other side of the building. Mr. Klawitter stated the proponent would not object to planting 10 -foot arborvitae; but noted a letter from the landscape architect outlining the lower survivability with spaded trees. Mr. Klawitter stated that requiring the installation of sound attenuation equipment at the current location would not solve sight issues and would require a building permit. He suggested the best solution was to move the air conditioning unit to reduce the sound level, plant landscaping to address sight issues, and if the noise levels were still too high, the noise attenuation equipment could be installed. Mr. Klawitter suggested the equipment be moved the week of September 5, 2011, when temperatures should be lower. It was noted the geothermal system came on line last week but there had been no abatement on use of the chiller due to the very hot weather being experienced. Mr. Klawitter displayed the amended site plan and explained that the underground utilities and easement location would impact the ability to install an earth berm. He added the other air conditioner served 7500 York, not the proponent's property. Mr. Klawitter explained that due to cost, the mechanical system and construction documents had not been completed until after Council's approval which was why the air conditioning unit had not been identified on the site plan. The Council asked whether it was the proponent's intent to install the originally approved landscaping including_ trees. Mr. Klawitter answered affirmatively. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 8:13 p.m. Public Testimony Jody Virnig, 7420 Edinborough Way, #6217, addressed the Council. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The Council discussed issues raised during public testimony and indicated its concern that nearby residents will have endured excessive noise the entire summer. ttlCCouncil Members indicated their desire to immediately require installation of the noise attenuation equipment. The Council discussed the option of continuing the berm toward the north in addition to plantings but indicated landscaping would be adequate as the proposed installation site was adjacent to a parking lot. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -72, approving an amendment to the Site Plan for the York Gardens project at 3451 Parklawn Avenue based on the following findings: 1. The proposed plans are consistent with the approved Site Plan for the development. 2. The air conditioning unit would be properly screened and would not impact the building or parking areas. 3. The air conditioning unit would be relocated to move it farther away from adjacent residential property and farther away from the new building. Approval is subject to the following conditions: Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /July 19, 2011 1. In addition to meeting the previously approved site plan conditions for the site, the site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date - stamped June 23, 2011 • Landscaping plan date - stamped June 23, 2011 • Building elevations date - stamped June 23, 2011 2. Per Section 850.10. Subd. 3.6 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, a letter of credit, performance bond or cash deposit must be submitted in the amount equal to 150% of the proposed landscaping. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. To verify that the unit complies with MPCA noise regulations, performance testing of daytime and nighttime standards is required. The testing must be conducted by an acoustical engineer in accordance with Minnesota Statutes Chapter 7030. The air conditioner unit must be operating at maximum capacity during the testing periods. Final test reports indicating compliance with the noise standards must be submitted to the Edina Health Department. if S. The applicant is required to plant 8 -foot Arborvitae to screen the unit. 6. The current location of the chiller will be excavated and re- landscaped per previously approved landscape plan. 7. Noise abatement equipment must be ordered and installed immediately on the air conditioning unit in its current location and continue to be used at the new location. The noise abatement equipment should be installed by August 31, 2011, if possible. The applicant will work with staff to get the equipment installed in a timely manner. 8. The applicant shall apply for a building permit and begin preparing the new location for the air conditioning unit immediately. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT Wayne Carlson, 523 Coventry Lane, asked the Council to reconsider his request for four dogs based on its therapeutic benefit. Mayor Hovland suggested Mr. Carlson submit evidence of his Post Traumatic Stress Disorder diagnosis. Vlll. REPORTS / RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.A. RESOLUTION NO. 2011-73 ADOPTED —ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -73 accepting various donations. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.B. STUDENTS APPOINTED TO ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS The Council thanked Members Bennett and Brindle, who interviewed the student applicants, and considered their recommendations for appointment. Members Brindle and Bennett stated their favorable impression of student applicants and described the process used to formulate their recommendations. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving the following students for a term of one year beginning September 2, 2011: Edina Art Center Board — Justin Moran, Tara Mohtadi; Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /July 19, 2011 Edina Housing Foundation — Yasmeen Almog, Jamie Mayer; Energy & Environment Commission — Tara Gupta, Bevlin Jennings; Edina Community Health Committee — Maggie Stang, Tyler Gieseke; and Heritage Preservation Board —Anna Ellingboe, Samuel Copman. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving the following students for a term of one year beginning September 2, 2011: Human Rights & Relations Commission — Gabe Aderhold, Mackenzie Nolan; Park Board — James Neville, Patricia Weicht; Planning Commission — Emily Cherkassky, Matthew Rock; and, Transportation Commission — Steven Schweiger, Haley Housh. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.C. MEMBERS APPOINTED TO ART CENTERBOARD AND HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD Mayor Hovland made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, g approving the Mayor's recommendation for appointments as follows: Art Center Board — Kitty O'Dea with a term ending February 1, 2013; and, Heritage Preservation Board — Robert Moore with a term ending February 1, 2012. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS — Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received Due to resident questions relating to nearby remodeling, staff was asked to compile educational guidelines on Code requirements. Staff was also asked to clarify regulatory traffic signage in areas of road construction, possibly creating a webpage alerting of road reconstruction, and to draft a complaint response policy for process to be followed going forward. Assistant City Engineer Sullivan advised of the current policy to post advisory signage and inform impacted residents on a weekly basis of neighborhood projects and road closures. Xl. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received X11. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:25 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, August 3, 2011. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the July 19, 2011, meeting available. Page 5 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JULY 19, 2011 5:30 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff attending the meeting included: Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications & Marketing Director; Debra Mangen, City Clerk; Scott Neal, City Manager; Ceil Smith, Assistant to the City Manager; and Cary Teague, Planning Director. Proponents of an indoor turf /field recreation facility (sportsdome) included: Shannon Rusk, Paige Rickert, Mark Bigelbach and Pat Barrett. Mayor Hovland stated the purpose of receiving information from persons advocating for an indoor sportsdome in the City of Edina. Shannon Rusk and Paige Rickert presented their ideas for development of a seasonal sportsdome. The vision presented was of a facility that could accommodate youth athletic associations, walkers, youth recreation programs, adult sports leagues, Edina Public Schools events such as graduations and pep fests, fundraisers and corporate events. The proposed dome would be approximately 108,000 square feet in size and would operate for 26 weeks each year. Ms. Rusk outlined potential benefits and reviewed existing facilities compared to those of surrounding communities. Mr. Rickert reviewed the various locations that have reviewed as potential sites for the sportsdome, stating pros and cons for each site. The Council asked questions of the presenters and discussed the perceived need for such a facility in Edina. The Council directed the Park Board to complete a facilities inventory of current recreational facilities to determine the city's needs. If the inventory indicates the need for a sportsdome, the Park Board will determine the best location and whether it should be operated by the City, a private organization or through a public - private partnership. Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, July 19, 2011 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7119/2011 13:33:44 Council Check Register Page - 1 7/21/2011 - 7/21/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 349348 7121/2011 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 27.25- 266523 0916594 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 54.60 266524 0620526 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 49.20 266525 0620529 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 47.40 266777 0814891 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 47.40 , 266778 0814890 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 108.20 266779 0814889 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 86.40 266780 0620527 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 96.20 266781 0814825 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING' 371.76 Repair Cooler 266909 297123295 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL 833.91 349349 712112011 129223 'ADVENTURE SPECIALTIES LLC 908.44 DIVER 06001/30 266683 11 -2398 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER 908.44 34935.0 712112011 100058 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 38,820.60 RECYCLING 266481 2584212 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES RECYCLING 38,820.60 349351 712112011 105253 AMERICAN FLAGPOLE AND FLAG CO. 5,369.07 FLAG POLES 00008070 266482 95065 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 5,369.07 349352 712112011 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES 59.40 266782 1000891276 5861.6201 LAUNDRY VERNON OCCUPANCY 59.40 349353 7/2112011 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 892.85 COPIER PAPER 266590 10289652 -00 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 264.31 Copy Paper 00006330 266910 10289986 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,157.16 349354 712112011 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 696.69 Various Food Items 00006333 266911 1588577 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 1,553.97 Food 00006333 266912 1585902 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 2.250.66 349355 712112011 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 1,154.08 PUMP REPAIRS 266483 37579 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 120.80 STENNER FEED TUBE 266731 37595 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 1,274.88 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/21/2011 - 7/21/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 349356 712112011 129335 ASCENDANCY RESEARCH 14,384.00 WEBSITE USABILITY TESTING 266591 110413 2210.6103 14,384.00 349357 7/2112011 101195 AUTO ELECTRIC OF BLOOMINGTON I 331.31 SHAKER MOTORS 00005240 266592 149356 - 1553.6530 331.31 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 349358 7/2112011 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 100638 BACHMAN'S MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COURSE BEAUTIFICATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 884.82 LILACS 00006495 266484 30010 5422.6541 884.82 Shrubs 266913 139852 5422.6275 1,769.64 349359 712112011 120814 BAGGALLINI INC. 52.41 March, 00006308 266914 399607 5440.5511 52.41 349360 712112011 129341 BAKKEN, SANDRA 5.85 ART WORK SOLD 266684 070511 5101.4413 5.85 349361 712112011 100642 BANNERS TOGO 153.90 PARK SIGNS 00001456 266633 32222 1647.6103 32.07 PARK SIGNS 00001454 266634 32215 1647.6103 185.97 349362 712112011 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 2,805.93 266526 59079100 5842.5513 196.05 266527 59092100 5822.5512 56.55 266528 59078900 5822.5513 37.55 266529 59078800 5822.5515 197.10 266530 59092300 5862.5512 456.15 266531 59092200 5842.5512 36.55 266532 59078600 5842.5515 130.70 266533 85440900 5842.5515 18.77 266534 85441100 5822.5515 114.55- 266783 59086600 5822.5513 37.27 266784 85477300 5822.5515 330.88 266785 59190100 5822.5512 675.35 266786 59188400 5862.5512 y 26.00 266787 85477200 5862.6512 7119/2011 13:33:44 .Page- 2 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COURSE BEAUTIFICATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES ART WORK SOLD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COST OF GOODS SOLD NNE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST, OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR PAPER SUPPLIES ART CENTER REVENUES PATHS'& HARD SURFACE PATHS & HARD SURFACE YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH, ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX SNOW & LAWN CARE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 7/19/2011 13:33:44 - Page- 3 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING PSTF OCCUPANCY YORK SELLING YORK SELLING SPECIAL ACTIVITIES SENIOR CITIZENS SENIOR CITIZENS SENIOR CITIZENS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET SEASON TICKETS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 7/21/2011 - 7/21/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 43.09 266787 85477200 5862.5515 532.28 266788 6083200 5862.5515 37.55 266789 59078700 5862.5515 107.77 266790 85441000 5662.5515 5,610.99 349363 712112011 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 443.50 Outdoor Sprinkler Repair 266915 137643 7411.6136 443.50 349364 7121/2011 125139 BERNICK'S WINE 772.20 266775 28143 5842.5514 7.80- 266776 13116 5842.5514 764.40 349365 7/2112011 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 59.84 NAME BADGES FOR PARADE 266593 WO- 703342 -1 1627.6103 100.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES 266635 OE- 260418 -1 1628.6513 44.50 OFFICE SUPPLIES 266636 OE- 259729 -1 1628.6513 40.08- . CREDIT 266637 CP -OE- 258265 -1 1628.6513 5.75 PENS 00009156 266685 OE- 259876 -1 5110.6406 21.91 STAMP 00003072 266686 WO- 702899 -1 1400.6513 485.03 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003075 266687 WO- 704296 -1 1400.6513 677.23 349366 712112011 125209 BISEK, KATIE 51.10 Phone Reimbursement 266916 9522928941 1554.6230 51.10 349367 7121/2011 125268 BLUE COMPACTOR SERVICES 412:54 COMPACTOR RENTAL. 266763 456 4095.6103 412.54 349368 712112011 129336 BLUM, LEE 10.55 SEASON TICKET REFUND 266638 071211 5300.2039 145.02 SEASON TICKET REFUND 266638 071211 5301.4532 155.57 349369 712112011 '119631 BONNER & BORHART LLP 15,156.25 PROSECUTING 266732 53921 1195.6103 15,156.25 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX SNOW & LAWN CARE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES 7/19/2011 13:33:44 - Page- 3 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING PSTF OCCUPANCY YORK SELLING YORK SELLING SPECIAL ACTIVITIES SENIOR CITIZENS SENIOR CITIZENS SENIOR CITIZENS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET SEASON TICKETS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES R55CKREG LOG20000 200.14 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES CITY OF EDINA 266746 87260768 1470.6510' 89.88 Council Check Register 266918 87261645 5621.6610 7/2112011 — 7/21/2011 " Check # Data Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 349370 712112011 129361 BORCHARDT, LORI 47.52 GASKET, SEAL 78.00 Gazebo Rental Cancellation 266917 1600.4722.03 ARNESON ACRES RENTAL 127.53 78.00 00005239 266595 537253 349371 712112011 274.65 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 00005244 266688 538074 1553.6530 245.84 ELECTRICAL PARTS 266485 902573909 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 245.84 349374 7121/2011 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC - 349372 7/2112011 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 1,815.25 FIRST AID SUPPLIES SAFETY EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR.PARTS CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN 7/1912011 13:33:44 Page- 4 Business Unit PARK ADMIN. GENERAL POOL OPERATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT-OPERATION GEN BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT BA -373 OSCAR ROBERTS RECON RIDGE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION BA -334 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON BA -371 KILLARNEY SHORES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 200.14 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003874 266746 87260768 1470.6510' 89.88 First Aid 266918 87261645 5621.6610 290.02 349373 7/2112011 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 47.52 GASKET, SEAL 00005238 266594 537220 1553.6530 127.53 SENDER ASSEMBLY 00005239 266595 537253 15516530 274.65 TENSIONER, COOLANT 00005244 266688 538074 1553.6530 449.70 . 349374 7121/2011 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 1,815.25 CONSTR MATERIALS TESTING 267021 336028 01367.1705.20 1,446.50 CONSTR MATERIALS TESTING 267022 336111 01373.1705.20 1,627.75 CONSTR MATERIALS TESTING 267023 336113 01384.1705.20 1,944.75 CONST MATERIALS TESTING 267025 336114 01334.1705.20 2,019.50 CONSTR MATERIALS TESTING 267026 336112 01371.1705.20 8,853.75 349375 7121/2011 129130 BRIMEYER FURSMAN LLC 3,220.00 RECRUITMENT SERVICES 266596 178 1120.6103 3,270.00 266597 0179 1120.6103 3,600.00 266598 180 1120.6103 10,090.00 349376 712112011 100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY - 619.25 INLET PROTECTION 00001369 266689 12106031 -00 5932.6406 619.25 349377 712112011 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 125.60 Club 00006140 266919 922635315 5440.5511 297.68 Club 00006140 266920 922652908 5440.5511 181.27 Club 00006140 266921 922639518 5440.5511 120.44 Club 00006140 266922 922672406 5440.5511 FIRST AID SUPPLIES SAFETY EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR.PARTS CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN 7/1912011 13:33:44 Page- 4 Business Unit PARK ADMIN. GENERAL POOL OPERATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT-OPERATION GEN BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT BA -373 OSCAR ROBERTS RECON RIDGE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION BA -334 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON BA -371 KILLARNEY SHORES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES . ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP GENERAL STORM SEWER PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 11,334.65 CITY OF EDINA 711912011 13:33:44 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 5 7/21/2011 - 7/21/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 724.99 349378 712112011 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 1,014.15 266535 929731 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 994.40 266536 928168 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 114.60 266765 931161 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,489.15 266766 931160 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,612.30 349379 712112011 129352 CARTER, PHYLLIS 2.20 Refund for Overparment 266923 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 2.20 349380 712112011 116883 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 260.00 266791 90667 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 80.00- 266857 90660 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 180.00 349381 7121/2011 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 47.94 MOUSE 00004331 266599 XLW5625 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 2,416.03 LAPTOP 00004346 266690 XWHS653 2330.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DRUG FORFEITURE 2,463.97 349382 712112011 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 12.82 266600 070511 5821.6186 HEAT 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 24.08 266600 070511 5861.6186 HEAT VERNON OCCUPANCY 25.28 266600 070511 5841.6186 HEAT YORK OCCUPANCY 32.89 266600 070511 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 34.39 266600 070511 5422.6186 HEAT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 46.70 266600 070511 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 47.72 266600 070511 1481.6186 HEAT YORK FIRE STATION - 81.06 266600 070511 5921.6186 HEAT SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 125.28 266600 070511, 5630.6186 HEAT CENTENNIAL LAKES 134.19 266600 070511 5913.6186 HEAT DISTRIBUTION 237.42 266600 070511 5111.6186 HEAT ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 317.59 266600 070511 5420.6186 HEAT CLUB HOUSE 443.76 266600 070511 1646.6186 HEAT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 468.10 266600 070511 1628.6186 HEAT SENIOR CITIZENS 1,501.66 266600 070511 5911.6186 HEAT WELL PUMPS 2,144.05 266600 070511 5210.6186 HEAT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 5.657 -66 266600 070511 5511.6186 HEAT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 11,334.65 CITY OF EDINA 7/19/2011 13:33:44 RSSCKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 6 7/21/2011 - 7/21/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 349383 712112011 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 286.85 266537 449290 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,646.25 266767 449876 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,933.10 349384 712112011 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 71.36 00103426 - 0203158000 266601 203158000 -7/11 1552.6189 SEWER & WATER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 121.29 00103426- 0203158108 266602 203158108 -7/11 1552.6189 SEWER &' WATER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 264.33 00103426 - 0203502003 266603 203502003 -7/11 1552.6189. SEWER & WATER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 74.08 00114667- 0210000012 266604 210000012 -7111 4090.6189 SEWER & WATER 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 583.23 00082050- 0200650009 266639 200650009 -7/11 1551.6189 SEWER & WATER CITY HALL GENERAL 415.05 00082050- 0200650018 266640 200650018 -7/11 1551.6189 SEWER & WATER CITY HALL GENERAL 80.84 00082198- 0200815001 266641 200815001 -7/11 1375.6189 SEWER & WATER PARKING RAMP 567.77 00101025- 0203600013 266642 203600013 -7111 1628.6189 SEWER & WATER SENIOR CITIZENS 31.07 00101025-0203610011 266643 203610011 -7/11 1628.6189 SEWER & WATER SENIOR CITIZENS 19.38 00114064 - 0203163012 266644 203163012 -7/11 4091.6189 SEWER & WATER GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 19.38 001140640203502012 266645 203502012 -7/11 4091.6189 SEWER & WATER GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 2,247.78 349385 712112011 102165 CLEVELAND GOLF 414.78 Club 00006139 265924 3431910 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 414.78 - 349386 7121/2011 101119 COCKRIEL, VINCE 116.55 Mileage Reimbursement 00001419 266925 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 116.55 349387 712112011 120433 COMCAST 1.80 8772 10 614 0023973 266486 23973 -7/11 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 2.71 8772 10 614 0023973 266486 23973 -7/11 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 82.60 Cable /Intemet 00006332 266926 877210614016495 5430.6188 TELEPHONE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 9 91.05 Comcast Wi -Fi - EP 266927 877210614022068 . , 5620.6230 _ SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 6 178.16 349388 712112011 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 2,284.58 ASPHALT 00001837 266691 061511 5913.6518 BLACKTOP DISTRIBUTION 244.62. ASPHALT 00001837 266692 063011 5913.6518 BLACKTOP DISTRIBUTION 2,529.20 CITY OF EDINA 7/19/2011 13:33:44 R55CKREG LOG20000 . Council Check Register Page - 7 7/21/2011 - 712112011 Check #' Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 349389 7/2112011 100697 COOL AIR MECHANICAL INC. 3,075.53 REPLACE VACUUM PUMP MOTOR 00008072 266487 74808. 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 969.25 BRINE PUMP REPAIR 00008071 266488 74812 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 1,150.78 COMPRESSOR REPAIR 00008075 266489 74874 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 5,195.56 349390 7121/2011 102596 CROWN TROPHY 37.71 Public Art Engraving 00009161 266928 27248 4105.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC ART 37.71 349391 712112011 724231 D. ERVASTI SALES CO. 1,560.91 BALLFIELD SUPPLIES 00001272 266646 11090 1642.6542 INFIELD MIXTURE' FIELD MAINTENANCE 1,560.91 349392 712112011 102791 D2 SERVICES INC. 3,641.60 SCADA SERVICE 00005430 266676 10082 05508.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS WM -508 SCADA SYSTEM 4,051.20 SCADA SERVICE 00005430 266677_ 10080 05508.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS WM -508 SCADA SYSTEM 7,692.80 349393 712112011 121618 DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 2,828.00 METERS 00001376 266678 6934977 5917.6530 REPAIR PARTS. METER REPAIR 2,828.00 349394 712112011 104020 DALCO 136:07 HAND TOWELS 00001454- 266605 2350600 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 270.11 TISSUE, DEFOAMER, FLOOR CARE 00001454 266606 2349944 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 307.80 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00001424 266647 2350526 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 223.37 Grill Cleaner 00006330 266929 2350442 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 172.07 Cleaning Supplies 00008082 .266930 2351078 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 79.09 Floor Scrubber Parts 00008068 266931 2352322 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,188.51 349395 712112011 129337 DANKS, JOANNA 6.54 SEASON TICKET REFUND 266648 071111 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 90.02 SEASON TICKET REFUND 266648 071111 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 96.56 349396 712112011 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 2,720.07 266538 608554 5842.5514 COST OF..GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 44.80 266539 608553 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 87.80 266540 607712 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,710.50 266541 607713 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER , VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA 7/19/2011 13:33:44 _ R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - .8 7/21/2011 - 7/21/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit - 3,809.10 266792 608551 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 43.90 266793 608550 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,931.70 266794 608552 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER BOTH ST SELLING 10,347.87 349397 712112011 122135 DENFELD, SCOTT 39.78 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT- 266733 071311 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 49.00 COYOTES - STOCK FOOTAGE 266734 071411 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 88:78 349398 712112011 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 40.00 Bakery 00006329 266932 375500 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 118.22 Bakery - 00006329 266933 374396 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD : GRILL _ 56.54 Bakery b0006329 266934 374707 3421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD - GRILL 150.27 Bakery . 00006329 266935 374397 5421.5510. COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 78.56 Bakery - 00006329 266936 375092 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD. GRILL 49.97 Bakery 00006329 266937 375378 5421.5510 - COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 72.72 Bakery 00006329 266938 375077 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 566.28 349399 712112011 118375 DEPAUL LETTERING 76.00" POLOS 266747 6625 1460.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 76.00 349400 712112011 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 123.35 Dex Advertising 266939 110311867 5621.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION - 485.25 Advertising 266940 110311893 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF'ADMINISTRATION ' 608.60 349401 712112011 123162 Disk NETWORK 54.53 Cable TV 266941 825570708142283 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 9 54.53 349402 712112011 129157 DO- GOOD.B121NC 374.25 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE MAILING 266650 4216 -01 1140.6235 POSTAGE PLANNING 211.48 266651 4205 -01 1146.6235 POSTAGE PLANNING 342.63 PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE MAILING 266735 4261 -01 1140.6235 POSTAGE PLANNING 928.36 349403 712112011 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES. 413.56 CHLORINE 266649 82700913 -11 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION CITY OF EDINA 7/1912011 13:33:44 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 7/21/2011 - 7/21/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 5,995.05 CHEMICALS 00001840 266679 82700935 -11 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 6,408.61 349404 712112011 129345 DW MOORE STUCCO INC. 9,890.00 RE -STUCO AT ARENA 00008038 266743 7 -9 -11 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 9,890.00 349406 712112011 119716 EASTERN PACIFIC APPAREL INC. 44.91 Merchandise 00006086 266942 462269 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 44.91 349406 712112011 106496 ED'S TROPHIES INC. 31.71 AWARD 266490 84080 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 31.71' 349407 712112011 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE WINLECTRIC CO. 27.35 CONDUIT 00001446 266693 08162400 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 27.35 349408 7/2112011 106340 EDINA CAR WASH 107.28 JUNE WASHES- 266694 4703 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 107.28 349409 7121/2011 100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 617.50 TIF REPORTING 266607 343035 1000.1303 , DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 617.50 349410 712112011 117868 ELK RIVER FORD INC. 22,641.64 2011 CROWN VICTORIA 00003077 266748 046978 421400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 22,641.64 349411 712112011 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 315.00 266795 W395871 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 315.00 349412 712112011 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY - '" 327.98- CREDIT 266608 1- 3669411 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3.59 'SPARK PLUGS 00005788-266609 1- 3670880 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 474.59 COMPRESSOR ASSEMBLY 00005188 266610 69- 042027 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 109.04 BRAKE PAD KIT 00005188 266611 69- 042272 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 84.39 SWITCH ASSEMBLY 00005188 266749 69- 042432 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 423.64 BRAKE PADS, ROTORS 00005188 266750 69- 042433 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN Subledger Account Description REPAIR' PARTS REPAIR PARTS COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD 7/19/2011 13:33:44 Page - 10 Business Unit EQUIPMENT,OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN RICHARDS GOLF COURSE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE COST OF. GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS LAUNDRY ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 BUILDING MAINTENANCE LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE Council Check Register 7/21/2011 - 7/21/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 56.70 BRAKE PADS 00005188 266751 70- 061134 1553.6530 123.74 ROTORS 00005188 266752 70- 061133 1553:6530 947.71 349413 712112011 122549 FARNER - BOCKEN COMPANY 565.51 Food 00006342. 266943 8341244 5430.5510. 25.00- Food 00006342 266944 8301921 5430.5510 540.51 349414 7/2112011 126909 FETTE PRODUCTIONS 2,100.00 SOUND SYSTEM FOR`JULY.4TH 266652. EDINA4TH 1647.6103 2,100.00 349415 712112011 101475 FOOTJOY 84.27 Shoes 00006183 286945 3801733 5440.5511 84.27 349416 7/2112011 124520 FRESHWATER HARVESTING INC. 6,770.00 WEED CONTROL 00001535 266653 201136 4086.6103 6,770.00 349417 7/2112011 100764 G & K.SERVICES - - 81.63 266491 063011 5511.6201 90.92 266491 063011 1552.6406 97.00 266491 063011 5913.6201 97.93 266491 063011 1646.6201 - 109,27 266491 063011 1646.6201 198.80 266491 063011 1553.6201 286.80 266491 063011 1301.6201 - 962.35 349418 7/2112011 120776 GAGE, NATHALIE 45.29 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 266736 071311 2210.6107 38.07 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 266737 071411 2210.6107 83.36 349419 712112011 127385 GARAGE DOOR STORE , 329.82 GARAGE DOOR REPAIR 00005193 266612 18653 1552.6530 329.82 349420 712112011 129342 GARY CARLSON EQUIPMENT 421.09 TEST BALL 00001362 266695 01- 9243 -0 5932.6103 Subledger Account Description REPAIR' PARTS REPAIR PARTS COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD 7/19/2011 13:33:44 Page - 10 Business Unit EQUIPMENT,OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN RICHARDS GOLF COURSE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE COST OF. GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS LAUNDRY ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS. MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE -- COMMUNICATIONS REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER CITY OF EDINA 7/19/2011 13:33:44 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 11 7121/2011 - 7/21/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 421.09 349421 712112011 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY - MINNEA 233.54 AUTO PARTS 266696 063011 5422.6556 TOOLS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 301.77 AUTO PARTS 266696 063011 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 357.81 AUTO PARTS 266696 063011 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 484.58 AUTO PARTS 266696 063011 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,377.70 349422 712112011 118941 GLOBALSTAR USA 29.15 R -91 PHONE 266654 3110923 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 29.15 349423 712112011 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. - 1,806.35 JUNE TICKETS 00001377 266680 16065 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 1,806.35 349424 712112011 101103 GRAINGER 43.96 WELDING CABLES 00005203 266613 9576753082 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 220.75 SUNSCREEN 00001216-266697 9555062778 1301.6406 GENERAUSUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 154.33 SUNSCREEN, GLOVES 00001218 266698 9555062760 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 419.04 349425 7/21/2011 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 979.50 266796 112372S 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 196.50 266797 112436S 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,176.00 349426 712112011 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 18,796.00 Golf Lessons June 266946 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 18,796.00 349427 7/21/2011 104482 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 211.38 . New Kiln Maintenance .00009036 266947 115351 5100.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT ART CENTER BALANCE SHEET 211.38 349428 712112011 129205 HARRIS COMPANIES 23,593.50 HVAC - Base changeout 266948 58587 7411.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PSTF OCCUPANCY 23,593.50 349429 712112011 101255 HASLER INC. 96.55 POSTAGE MACHINE RENTAL 266699 14283162 1400.6235 POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF EDNA 7/19/2011 13`.33:44 RSSCKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 12 7/21/2011 - 7121/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier /Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit :. 96.55 349430 712112011 100800 HEDGES, DIANA 5.99 Various Reimbursements 266949. 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 21.17 Various Reimbursements 266949 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 41.99 Various Reimbursements 266949 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 69.15 349431 712112011 101576 HEGGIES PIMA ,. 182.65 Pizza 00006334 266950 5421.6510 j COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 182.65 349432 712112011, 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 282.24 Meat 00006335 266951 23281 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL " 282.24 349433 712112011 105436 • HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 4,300.31 RADIO ADMIN FEE 266738 2101:18016 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,718.80 RADIO ADMIN FEE 266739 110636016 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,274.96 Radio Lease 266952 110638015 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT, GENERAL 7,294.07 349434 712112011 119763 HIGH SHINE CO INC 480.94 STRIP & WAX FLOOR 266492 1394 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. CITY HALL GENERAL 480.94 349435 712112011 100805 HIRSHFIELD'S 89.11 Paint " 266953 003448430 5620.6532 PAINT EDINBOROUGH PARK 7.92 Paint Br6sh 266954 003448431 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 97.03 _ 349436 712112011 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 56.00 266542 565201 5862.5515 COST.& GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 943.50 266543 565200 5862.5514 COST-OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING " 807.61 266798 565956 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS. SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 637.50 266799 -566091 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD -BEER VERNON SELLING 2,444.61 349437 712112011 112628 ICEE COMPANY, THE 1,467.97 CONCESSION PRODUCT 266493 . 931138 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 1,467.97 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/21/2011 - 7121/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 349438 7/21/2011 101714 IDENTISYS INC. 1.252.58 ID CARD SUPPLIES 00004833 266614 107449 5310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 7/19/2011 13:33:44 Page- 13 Business Unit POOL ADMINISTRATION 1,252.58 349439 712112011 129353 IRISSARI, JANINE 65.00 Art Work Sold 266955 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 65.00 349440 712112011 125031 J.S. PALUCH COMPANY INC. 33.70 Advertisement 266959 1225394 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 33.70 349441 712112011 129175 JAMECO ELECTRONICS 2,257.25 POWER SUPPLIES 00001370 266681 15508615-001 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 2,257.25 349442 7121/2011 102157 JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIATES INC. 800.00 SAFETY AUDIT 266494 20051125 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL ADMINISTRATION 800.00 349443 7121/2011 100828 JERRY'S FOODS 13.37 266753 063011 1623.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION 27.01 266753 063011 _ 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 52.32 266753 063011 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 52.82 266753 063011 1470.4760 DONATIONS - GOVT FUND FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 57.35 266753 063011 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 65.01 266753 063011 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 93.19 266753. 063011 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 361.07 349444 7121/2011 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 5.55 266774 063011 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 7.50 266774 063011 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 10.08 266774 063011 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 11.60 266774 063011 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 13.24 266774 063011 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 15.87 266774 063011 1322.6406 GENERAL'SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 19.21 266774 063011 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 23.99 266774 063011 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 42.73 266774 063011 5431.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 45.02 266774 063011 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 45.41 266774 063011 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/19/2011 13:33:44 Council Check Register Page - .' 14 7/21/2011 - 7/21/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Ac count Description Business Unit 92.68 266774 063011 4090.6406. GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 93.37 266774 063611 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 102.75 266774 063011 5431.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 125.39 266774 063011 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 125.54 266774 063011 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 159.57 266774, 063011 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 190.98 266774 063011 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 273.95 266774 063011 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 324.63 .266774 063011 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 451.08 266774 063011 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 706.16 266774 063011 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIALLAKES 818.24 266774 063011 •' 5630:6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,014.79 266774 063011 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 4,719.33 349445 712112011 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 473.40 266544 1560369 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD-BEER VERNON SELLING 176.00 266545 1560367 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 227.00 266800 1575608 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER mVERNON SELLING 3,866.65 266801 1564049 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 59.35 266802 1575711 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 980.35 266803 1575710 5842,5514 i COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 8,324.56 .266804 1575709 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,232.30 266805- 1575707 5822:5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 56.35 266806 1575708 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 68.80 266807 1575673 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 196.20 Beer 00006183 .266956 1562393 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 1,145.00 Beer 00006183 266957 1579572 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 320.40 Beer 00006183 266958 1579472 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 18,126.36 349446 712112011 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 771.20 Fertilizer 266960 58459588 5650.6540 FERTILIZER PROMENADE 771.20 349449 7/2112011 100835- JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 979.38 266546 1090469 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 22.11 266547 1090475 '5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 140.14 266548 1090470 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 449.34 266549 1090473 5822.5513 COST OF, GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 31.37 266550 1090472 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 685.02 266551 1090474 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount 894.35 825.03 935.58 77.10 334.41 13.17- 1,092.00 1,474.42 44.22 1.12 1,016.42 2,943.25 33.12 322.82 320.86 911.99 2,136.90 57.48- 1,072.06 11.09 - 6.22- 233.18 2.76- 4.60- 373.84 2,074.96 160.97 - 78.22- 321.47 3,258.20 133.48 828.34 1,492.42 22.11 193.24 460.47 1,416.91 27,217.12 Supplier / Explanation PO # 349450 712112011 124361 JOHNSON, LUANN 44.85 Art Work Sold CITY OF EDINA 7/19/2011 13:33:44 Council Check Register Page - 15 7/21/2011 - 7121/2011 Doe No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 266552 1090471 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 266553 1091661 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 266554 1091663 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 266555 1090952 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 266556 1091662 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 266768 501940 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 266808 1095067 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 266809 1095061 5662.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 266810 1095062 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 266811 1095051 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 266812 1095064 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 266813 1085032 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 266814 1095063 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 266815 1095066 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 266816 1095069 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 266817 1095068 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 266818 1095065 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 266819 501941 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 266820 1095052 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 266821 502136 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 266822 501206 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 266823 1095050 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 266824 502634 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 266825 502512 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 266826 1095049 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR - 50TH ST SELLING 266827 1095053 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 266828 502283 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 266829 502282 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 266830 9095054 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 266891 1095656 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 266832 1095057 5842.5515, COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING .266833 1095055 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 266834 1095058 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 266835 1095059 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 266836 1095060 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 266837 1095048 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 266838 1095047 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 267024 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES RSSCKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/19/2011 13:33:44 Council Check Register Page- 16 7/21/2011 - 7/21/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier /-Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 44.85 349451 712112011 100919 JOHNSON, NAOMI 17.15 PETTY CASH 266700 070611 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 19.37 PETTY CASH 266700 070611 4105.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC ART 51.11 PETTY CASH 266700 070611 5111:6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 56.79 PETTY CASH 266700- 070611 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 66.12 PETTY CASH 266700 070611 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES _ ART CENTER' ADMINISTRATION 192.72 PETTY CASH 266700 070611 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 403.26 I 349452 712112011 102080 KATTREH, ANN .. 115.77.. Mileage Reimbursement 266962 5621.6107 MILEAGE OR'ALLOWANCE .- EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 128.01 Mileage Reimbursement - June 266963" 107129 5621.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 243.78 349453 712112011 129346 KIELTY, CHRISTINE 143.00 CLASS REFUND 266745 071311 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 143.00 349454 712112011 104979 KOCON, ED 173.00 Mileage Reimbursement 266964 5410.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 173.00 349455 712112011 129338 KULESZA, JOHN 36.32 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 266655 5825 VERNON 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET LANE 36.32 349456 712112011 103271 LAKE RESTORATION INC. 4,821.38 POND SPRAYING 00001421 266656 83743 12,040.00 POND TREATMENTS 00001532 266657 83650 16,861.38 349457 712112011 116876 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 26.12 LANGUAGE INTERPRETER 266754 2774341 26.12 349458 712112011 100852, LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 206.81 CIRCUIT BREAKERS 00005115 266615 0599834 365.00 DRILL BITS, SCREWS, NUTS 00005201 266616 0602878 883.90 HOSE 00005191, .266755 0615982 5933.6103 5933.6103 1470.6103 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PONDS & LAKES - PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PONDS & LAKES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 7/19/2011 13:33:44 Page - 17 Business Unit POOL ADMINISTRATION 132.00 266839 11566 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 130 00 266840 5164 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 262.00 349461 712112011 101455 LOCAL 49 TRAINING CENTER 300.00 TRAINING 00001470 266701 INV0101 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 300.00 349462 712112011 129344 LUCK, CRYSTAL 3.53 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 266742 5929 CONCORD 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND AVE 3.53 349463 7121/2011 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 1,688.81 266557 112368 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 860 59 266558 112002 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,549.40 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 349464 712112011 101371 MACHOLDA, ED Council Check Register 117.41 7/21/2011 — 7/21/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 117.41 1,455.71 349459 712112011 712112011 100225 LIFEGUARD STORE INC, THE 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 14.35 SEAL MASK 266617 1WO57027 5310.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 82.58 14.35 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 349460 712112011 124810 LIFT BRIDGE BEER COMPANY 7/19/2011 13:33:44 Page - 17 Business Unit POOL ADMINISTRATION 132.00 266839 11566 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 130 00 266840 5164 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 262.00 349461 712112011 101455 LOCAL 49 TRAINING CENTER 300.00 TRAINING 00001470 266701 INV0101 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 300.00 349462 712112011 129344 LUCK, CRYSTAL 3.53 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 266742 5929 CONCORD 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND AVE 3.53 349463 7121/2011 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 1,688.81 266557 112368 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 860 59 266558 112002 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ELECTION ADMINISTRATION 2,325.94 Outdoor Landscaping 00002148 266966 52112 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK 2,325.94 2,549.40 349464 712112011 101371 MACHOLDA, ED 117.41 Mileage Reimbursement 266965 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 117.41 349465 712112011 100864 MACQUEEN EQUIPMENT INC. 82.58 HORN RELAY 00005277 266702 2114326 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 82.58 349466 712112011 102237 MANGEN, DEBRA 100.12 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 266618 070711 1180.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 159.70 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 266618 070711 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 259.82 349467 712112011 100875 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC. PARK ADMIN. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ELECTION ADMINISTRATION 2,325.94 Outdoor Landscaping 00002148 266966 52112 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK 2,325.94 CITY OF EDINA 7/19/201113:33:44 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register - Page - 18 7/21/2011 - 7/21/2011 Check # ' Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 349468 712112011 101483 MENARDS 51.36 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 00008077 266495 95205 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 9.55- RETURN 00008076 266496 95207 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 51.76 MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES 00008066 266497 95166 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 36.18 HARDWARE, CONCRETE MIX 00001426 266658 98868 1646.6406` GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 93.62 LUMBER 00001465 266659 99183, 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 22.22 TUBING; ELBOW 00001360 - 266703 93560, 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 23.98 Repair Supplies 00006288 266967 99055 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 269.57 349469 _ 7121/2011 101987 MENARDS 32.58 Window Shade 00002156 266968 6348 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 32.58 349470 712112011 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 544.53 FIELD PAINT 00001427 266660 133576 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 544.53 349471 712112011 100885 METRO SALES INC 3,656.00 COPIER USAGE 266498 414981 1550.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 449.10 Rental Equipment 266969 415474 5110.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION - 4,105.10 349472 712112011 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAI 267.43 ROTORS 00005211 266756 476544 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 267.43 349473 712112011 124204 METSA, PAUL 300.00 TALENT FEE 07/06/11 267031 07/0612011 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 300.00 349474 712112011 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 1,044.50 ASPHALT 00001224 266704 110396MB 5913.6518 BLACKTOP DISTRIBUTION 1,909.64 266705 110623MB 5913.6518 BLACKTOP DISTRIBUTION 5,530.39 266706 110820MB 5913.6518 BLACKTOP DISTRIBUTION 3,346.82 266707 111030MB 5913.6518 BLACKTOP DISTRIBUTION 11,831.35 349475 712112011 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 402.71 CLEANING & BATHROOM SUPPLIES 267027 31363 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 810.161 CLEANING & BATHROOM SUPPLIES 267027 31363 1551.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 1,212.87 7/19/2011 13:33:44 Page - 19 Subledger Account Description Business Unit GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POSTAGE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 7/2112011 — 7/21/2011 Check # Date ' Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 349476 712112011 101356 ',MIDWEST FENCE & MFG COMPANY 63.52 FENCING 00001306 266619 140767 1318.6406 63.52 349477 712112011 103186 MIDWEST FUELS - 2,958.12 FUEL 00005273 266620 57210 1553.6581 2,958.12 349478 712112011 121053 MILLER, SUSAN 11.95 , Reimbursement for EP Petty Cas 266970 5621.6235 405.73 Reimbursement for EP Petty Cas 266970 5620.6406 417.68 349479 712112011 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,592.50 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00001375 266708 33875 5913.6180 1,592.50 349480 7/21/2011 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 5.34 WINDOW CLEANING, 266621 921086211 5821.6180 5.34 349481 7/2112011 100522 MINNESOTA AIR INC. 113.65 LOCKOUTS 00001457 266709 1249398 -00 5912.6406 113.65 349482 712112011 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 1,274.48 EMULSION 00005274 266710 62907 1301.6519 1,274.48 349483 712112011 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 2,563.93 WORKBENCH 00001157 266711 0089044 -IN 1301.6556 2,563.93 349484 712112011 102812 'MN DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUS 35.00 LICENSE RENEWAL -DAN MCMAHON 266622 AJ11669 1240.6105 35.00 349485 712112011 129354 MOIR, BILL 171.64 Walkie Talkies - Reimbursement 266971 5310.640E 171.64 7/19/2011 13:33:44 Page - 19 Subledger Account Description Business Unit GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POSTAGE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPLIES WELL HOUSES ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION CITY OF EDINA 7/19/2011 13:33:44 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 20 7/21/2011 — 7/21/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Su6ledger Account Description Business Unit 349486 712112011 126981 MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAINS INC. - 2,010.00 DRINKING FOUNTAIN FOR ARDEN 00001399 266661 IW22683 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 2,010.00 r 349487 712112011 100906 MTI.DISTRIBUTING INC. 37.12 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001417 266662 . 797739 -00 1643.6530 .REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 37.12 349488 712112011 129360 MUELLER, PATRICK 2.18 Daily Admission Refund 266972 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 30.00 Daily Admission Refund 266972 •.- 5301.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 32.18 J 349489 712112011 121482 NEATON'S CRANE SERVICE INC. 250.00 Crane - Service 266973 10598 7413.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PSTF FIRE TOWER .. 250.00 349490 7/2112011 129340 NGF CONSULTING INC. 7,762.04 PROFESSIONAL FEES 266663 98584 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 7,762.04 - 349491 7121/2011 129349 NI, ZHENYA 3.05 Season Ticket Refund 266974 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 41.95 Season Ticket Refund 266974 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 45.00 ' 349492 712112011 104350 NIKE USA INC. 39.16 Shorts 00006124 ,266975 934376345 5440.5511 COST OF 'GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 39.16 349493 712112011 ' _ 129347 NORTH AMERICAN TRAILER 827.64 APITON FLOOR 00005843 266744 3210840013 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 827.64 349494 712112011 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY CO. 155.14 TUBE PAINT, PADS 00009168 266712 40821500 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 155.14 349495 712112011 126257 NORTON, PAT 64.35 ART WORK SOLD 266713 070711 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 64.35 CITY OF EDINA 7/19/2011 13:33:44 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 21 7/21/2011 — 7/21/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 349496 712112011 126217 OAKES, ALLEN 24.00 Range Officer Certification 266976 7410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PSTF ADMINISTRATION 24.00 - 349497 712112011 123956 OAKS PROPERTIES 30.51 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 266741 5027 LINCOLN 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET CIR 30.51 349498 712112011 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 54.51 Paper 00006034 266977 1356342349 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 54.51 349499 7/2112011 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 151.13 CABLE ASSEMBLY 00001444 266714 645543 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 675.93 Pole Saw 00008067 266978 646715 5511.6406. GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 827.06 349500 712112011 106083 ON SITE SANITATION INC. 1,406.90 PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE 266499 A -425423 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES 1,406.90 349501 7121/2011 129073 ORCA COAST PLAYGROUND LTD 5.500.00 Toddler Slide - CIP 266979 201128 5600.1780 PARK & PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT EB /CL BALANCE SHEET 5,500.00 349502 712112011 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1,406.28 266559 8310035 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,360.01 266769 8311570 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF:GOODS SOLD NINE VERNON SELLING 3,036.73 266843 8311566 5842.5513 COST OFGOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 278.90 266844 8311568 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD ONE 50TH ST SELLING 33.25 266845 8310766 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 6.115.17 349503 712112011 119008 PCI ROADS 7,110.00 MILL CONCRETE SURFACE 00001471 266715 11707 1301.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS `GENERAL MAINTENANCE 7,110.00 349504 712112011 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 695.80 266846 68751530 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,468.21 Soda 00006327 266980 67068687 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 479.21 Soda 266981 67068714 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 5822.5513 5822.5512 5822.5513 5662.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5512 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5512 5842.5515 5822.5515 5822.5513 5822.5512 5822.5513 5440.5511 5440.5511 1647.6530 1647.6530 1647.6530 5440:5511 1553.6180 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD.WINE,,. COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS 'SOLD WINE ' COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE, COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE .COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD.LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE. COST OF GOODS-' PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS- PRO SHOP REPAIR PARTS REPAIR'PARTS REPAIR PARTS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP CONTRACTED REPAIRS 7/19/2011 13:33:44 Page- 22 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES` GRILL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST-SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK.SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING '50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PATHS & HARD SURFACE PATHS& HARD SURFACE PATHS & HARD SURFACE PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES `EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5,392.80 CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 .100743` PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 326.24 266560 2092830 Council Check Register 266561 2092829 7/21/2011 - 7/21/2011 Check # bate Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No. Inv No Account No _ 1,010.34 Soda 00007072 266982. 67068704 5630.5510 1,309.50 Soda 00006327 266983 62102565 5421.5516 429.74 Soda 00006327-266984 2096079 67068701 5430.5510 5822.5513 5822.5512 5822.5513 5662.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5512 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5512 5842.5515 5822.5515 5822.5513 5822.5512 5822.5513 5440.5511 5440.5511 1647.6530 1647.6530 1647.6530 5440:5511 1553.6180 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD.WINE,,. COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS 'SOLD WINE ' COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE, COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE .COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD.LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE. COST OF GOODS-' PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS- PRO SHOP REPAIR PARTS REPAIR'PARTS REPAIR PARTS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP CONTRACTED REPAIRS 7/19/2011 13:33:44 Page- 22 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES` GRILL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST-SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK.SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING '50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PATHS & HARD SURFACE PATHS& HARD SURFACE PATHS & HARD SURFACE PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES `EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5,392.80 349505 712112011 .100743` PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 326.24 266560 2092830 139:49 266561 2092829 1,195.15 266562 2092826 2,713.96 266847 2096080 11537.27 266848 2096081. 507.42 266849 2096074 305.53 266850 2096079 1,444,84 266851 2096077 450.08 266852 2096069 1,077.06 266853 2096075 629.11 266854 2096076 86.14 266855 2096078 21,12 266856 5822.5515 53.12 266858 2096071 229.56 266859 2096070 685.92 266860 2096068 11,402.01 349506 712112011 100119 PING 100.38 Irons 00006155 266985 10788858 ' 723.08 Irons and Hybrlds 00606155 266986 10791199 823.46 349507 712112011 123092 PLAYPOWER LT FARMINGTON INC. 557.89 PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT PARTS 00001256 266664 1400156451 669.04 00001240 266665 1400156476 246.88 -- 00001515 266666 1400156576 1,473.81 _ 349508 712112011 119498 POWERBILT GOLF 159.92 Clubs 00006325 266987 X56702 159.92 349509 712112011 101811 PREMIER FLEET SERVICES 3,662.90 VEHICLE REPAIRS -00005125 266757 21401 3,662.90 5822.5513 5822.5512 5822.5513 5662.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5512 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5512 5842.5515 5822.5515 5822.5513 5822.5512 5822.5513 5440.5511 5440.5511 1647.6530 1647.6530 1647.6530 5440:5511 1553.6180 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD.WINE,,. COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS 'SOLD WINE ' COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE, COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE .COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD.LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE. COST OF GOODS-' PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS- PRO SHOP REPAIR PARTS REPAIR'PARTS REPAIR PARTS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP CONTRACTED REPAIRS 7/19/2011 13:33:44 Page- 22 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES` GRILL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST-SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK.SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING '50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PATHS & HARD SURFACE PATHS& HARD SURFACE PATHS & HARD SURFACE PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES `EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA 7/19/2011 13:33:44 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 23 7/21/2011 - 7121/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 349610 712112011 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 72.00 BLADE SHARPENING 00008073 266500 254368 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 72.00 349511 712112011 106322 ,PROSOURCESUPPLY 704.07 Liners, Gloves, Wipers 00002321 266988 5249 5630.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 704.07 349512 7/2112011 100971 QUALITY WINE 1,223.42 266563 478204 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 57.60- 266564 469594-00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 31.33- 266565 468277 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,930.62 266770 481079 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,426.01 266861 48107200 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 598.12 266862 48107100 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,268.37 266863 48103300 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,336.82 266864 48107000 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 55.80 266865 481069CO 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 390.93 266866 48106800 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 577.60 266867 48107400 5822.5513 COST.OF.GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 188.13 266868 48107300 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD,-WINE 50TH ST SELLING 962.11 266869 48103400 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 12,869.00. 349513 712112011 123898 QWEST 18.69 651281-1355 B001311 266501 1311 -6/11 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 18.60 651281-1355 8001311 266502 1311 -7111 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 200.40 952 835 -6661 266503 6661 -7/11 1552:6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 57.70 952926 -0092 266504 0092 -7/11 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 121.87 952 926 -0419 266505 0419 -7/11 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 606.52 612 E01 -0426 266506 0426 -7/11 1550.6188 TELEPHONE - CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 294.54 612 E24 -8656 266507 8656 -7/11 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 606.52 612 E12 -6797 266508 6797 -7/11 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 524.40 612 E24 -8657 266509 8657 -7111 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUBHOUSE 523.85 612 E01 -8392 266510 8392 -7/11 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 104.80 GV911 612 E23 -0652 266716 0652 -7111 2310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES . E911 3,077.89 349514 712112011 117692 R & B CLEANING INC. 2,009.25 RAMP STAIRWELL CLEANING 266623 976 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 2,009.25 CITY OF EDINA 7/19/2011 13:33:44 RSSCKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page- 24- 7121/2011 - 7/21/2011 Check # ,Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 349515 712112011 104450 RAPID GRAPHICS & MAILING INC. 234.06 MAIL WATER BILLS 266667 6016 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 234.06 349516 712112011 105807 RAY ALLEN MANUFACTURING CO. IN 57.90 K9 SUPPLIES 00003076 266717 268012 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME °FUND K9 DONATION 57.90 349517 7/2112011 100974 RAYMOND HAEG PLUMBING 159.20 Repairs to drinking fountain 00002324 266989 13199 " 5650.6180. REPAIRS . PROMENADE 159.20 349518 712112011 104642 RCM SPECIALTIES INC. 982.82 EMULSION _ 00005275 266718 1352 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 956.96 266719 1367 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 956.96 266720 1381 1351.6519 ROAD OIL ` GENERAL MAINTENANCE 2,896.74 349519 712112011 129355 REEVE, JULIE 204.75 - Art Work Sold 266990 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 204.75 349520 7121/2011 129306 REINER, BOB 20.80 Art Work Sold 266991 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER: REVENUES 20.80 349521 712112011 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 122.14 SOFTENER SALT 00003648 266764 00253947 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 122.14 349522 712112011 102614 ROTARY CLUB OF EDINA . 303.00 Club Dues 266992 669 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 303.00 349523 712112011 100985 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO 340.95 HANDLES, DEPTH GAUGE 00001288 266721 C58184 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 340.95 349524 712112011 1019,63 S & S TREE SPECIALISTS 413.56 : WOOD MULCH 00001425 266668 52082 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 413.56 R55CKREG LOG20000 -Business Unit CITY OF EDINA TRAINING COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL Council Check Register GRILL GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 7/21/2011 — 7/21/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 349525 712112011 129348 SAFETY ON SITE LLC 2,230.00 FORKLIFT TRAINING 00001472 266758 07142011 .1281.6104 2,230.00 349526 712112011 101634 SAINT AGNE_ S BAKING COMPANY 50.80 Bakery 00006349 266994 316988 5421.5510 54.55 Bakery 00006349.266995 316668 5421.5510 105.35 349527 712112011 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 21.18 101 = """'9350 266759 071411 1624.6406 21.18 349528 712112011 124247 SAM'S ROYAL LAWN SERVICE 209.20 WEED CONTROL 00001513 266669 302 1643.6103 209.20 349529 712112011 104788 SANDY'S PROMOTIONAL STUFF 293.26 Water Bottles 00006326 266996 SH1133 5440.5511 293.26 349630 7/21/2011 101677 SCHMOLL, RUTH 301.82 Petty Cash Reimbursement 266993 1470.6406 301.82 349531 712112011 124114 SCNS SPORTS FOODS 56.40 Food 00006344 266998 38155 5421.5510 56.40 349532 712112011 100995 SEH 9,830.73 MINNEHAHA WOODS NEIGHBORHOOD 267028 245224 03460.1705.21 10,438.03 .:MINNEHAHA WOODS NEIGHBORHOOD 267028 245224 04375.1705.21 21,018.39 MINNEHAHA WOODS NEIGHBORHOOD 267028 245224 05511.1705.21 21,445.40 MINNEHAHA WOODS NEIGHBORHOOD 267028 245224 01334.1705.21 504.98 RIDGE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION 267029 245223 03461.1705.21 841.63 RIDGE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION 267029 245223 05510.1705.21 5,723.12 RIDGE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION 267029 245223 01384.1705.21 9,762.96 RIDGE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION 267029 245223 04374.1705.21 79,565.24 349533 7121/2011 118211 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 7/19/2011 13:33:44 Page- 25 Subledger Account Description -Business Unit CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING. INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON BA -334 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON SS-461 RIDGE RD RECONSTRUCTION WM -510 RIDGE RD RECONSTRUCTION RIDGE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION STS -374 RIDGE ROAD R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7119/201113:33:44 Council Check Register Page - 26 ' 7/21/2011 - 7121/2011. Check # _ . Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 114.42 PAINT 00001941 266670 6900 -1 1343.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BRIDGES GUARD RAILS 114.42 349534 7/2112011 120292 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS 256.00 STAFF SHIRTS 00005852 266671 409306 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 256.00 349535 712112011 105654 SIMPLEX GRINNELL LP 443.00 Alarm Monitoring 266999 33701939902 5620.6250 ALARM SERVICE EDINBOROUGH PARK 443.00 349536 712112011 101000 SIR SPEEDY 40.61 BUSINESS CARDS 266511 69438 1550.6406. GENERAL SUPPLIES 40.61 349537 712112011 106415 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY INC. 1,019.70 NI -HAWK PROGRAM 266512 324118759 .1600.4390.22 MINI HAWKS 1,019.70 349538 712112011 129356 SMITH, BILL 412.00 Adult Squash Ump 267000 4077.6103 412.00 349539 712112011 129308 SODERBERG, JULIE 6.82 Art Work Sold 267001 5101.4413 6.82 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 349540 712112011 127878 SOUTHERN WINE A_ ND SPIRITS 535.50 266566 1572544 5842.5513 COST OF-GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 465.00 266567 1594014 5822.5513. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 378.00 266771 1594032 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 677.63 266772 1572567 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 702.75 00071311 266870 1564033 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 247.50 266871 1572574 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD.WINE YORK SELLING 160.50 266872 1572593 5842.5513, COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 442.50 266873 1594034, 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING , 412.50 266874 1572573 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 165.00 266875 1594031 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,186.88 349541 712112011 122455 SPRING LAKE ENGINEERING 8,565.20 SCADA PROGRAMMING 00005430 266682 1150 05508.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS WIN -508 SCADA SYSTEM R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/21/2011 — 7/21/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 7/19/2011 13:33:44 Page - - 27 Business Unit REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES DONATIONS - GOVT FUND BRAEMAR MEMORIAL REVENUE MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT ART CENTER BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 8;565.20 349542 712112011 101004 SPS COMPANIES 34.42 NIPPLES, ELBOW 00005209 266760 S2395215.001 1553.6530 34.42 349543 712112011 102251 ST. ANDREWS PRODUCTS CO 195.68 Tees 00006264 266997 649551 5440.5511 195.68 349544 7/2112011 127108 STONE & STEEL 42.00 Memorial Stone 00006328 267002 1637 2401.4760 42.00 349545 712112011 106030 STRATEGIC EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY C " 1,925.00 Equipment Replacement 00009174 267003 1759688 5100.1740 1,925.00 349546 7/21/2011 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 888.60 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005279 266761 591890 1553.6180 888.60 349547 712112011 12.0998 SURLY BREWING CO. 1,261.00 266568 Z00334- 5842.5514 392.00 266876 Z00335 5862.5514 1,653.00 349548 712112011 120595 T- MOBILE 42.45 ACCT 477067848 267030 THRU 06/26/11 1260.6188 42.45 349549 7/2112011 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 38.00 Beer Line Clean 00006325 267004 404847 5421.6102 38.00 y 349550 712112011 104932, TAYLOR MADE 3,221.06 Clubs 00006138 267005 16249585 5440.5511 1,041.78 Clubs 00006138 267006 16267266 5440.5511 4,262.84 349551 712112011 122794 TENNANT SALES AND SERVICE COMP 93.54 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 00005202 266624 910439924 1553.6180 7/19/2011 13:33:44 Page - - 27 Business Unit REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES DONATIONS - GOVT FUND BRAEMAR MEMORIAL REVENUE MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT ART CENTER BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA 7/19/2011 13:33:44 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 26 7/2112011 - 7/2112011 Check # ; Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No. Account No Subledger Account Description ' J Business Unit 243.33 00005123 266625 910439644 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 36.34 CREDIT 00005074 266722 910443635 1553.6530 REPAIR; PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 300.53 349552 712112011 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY -.> 61.80 266569 646416 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,599.80 266877 647395 -- 5862:5514 COST OF.-GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 344.90 Beer 00006345 267007 646848 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 285.00 Beer 00006345 267008 -00770379 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL - 968.00 Beer 00006345 267009 770311 5421.5514 COST.OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL. 4,259.50 349553 712112011 101826 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP: 421.13 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 00008074 266513 921681 5510.6105. DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA ADMINISTRATION 421.13 349554 712112011 127318 TIGER ATHLETICS INC. 750.00 FITNESS TRAINING 266672 INV396 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 750.00 349555 712112011 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 392.00 MACHINE REPAIRS 00005196 266723 9R00082 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION, GEN 59.55 LATCH 00005276 266724 9CO0255 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 451.55 349556 712112011 101474 TITLEIST 96.65 Umbrella 00006137 267010 2749736 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO. SHOP RETAIL SALES 96.65 349557 712112011 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 18.75 CYLINDERIDEMURRAGE 00005194 266626 424864 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 138.36 WELDING GAS, NOZZLE 00005110 266627 355604 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 38.82 Welding _Tanks 267011 424865 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 195.93 349558 712112011 124753 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES 210.86 Phones - Internet 267012 181460239 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 210.86 349559 712112011 101042 TRIARCO 91.78 BRUSHES, GLUE, PAINT 00009163 266725 332687 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 91.78 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/21/2011 - 7121/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 349560 712112011 129339 TRIPP, ELAINE 125.00 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 266673 6209 TRACY AVE 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 125.00 349561 712112011 118190 TURFWERKS LLC _ 610.01 SWITCH, DETENT 00005242 266762 TI21442 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 610.01 349562 712112011 115379 U.S. BANK 17.90 NET ZERO 266628 070511 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 52.90 INTERNET 266628 070511 1550.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES 70.80 349563 712112011 103973 ULINE 34.16 INVENTORY LABELS 00003100 266726 38834820 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 34.16 349564 712112011 126926 ULTIMATE EVENTS 538.01 SHOWMOBILE SKIRTING 266514 24121 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 538.01 349565 712112011 125032 UNISELECT USA 853.16 AUTO PARTS 266727 063011 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 853.16 349566 712112011 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 12.98 SHIPPING CHARGE 266740 TRAN:8512 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 12.98 349567 7121/2011 101906 US FOODSERVICE INC 298.55 Food, Cleaner. Trays 00006346 267013 43805514 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 592.67 Food, Cleaner, Trays 00006346 267013 43805514 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 6,585.37 Food, Cleaner, Trays 00006346 267013 43805514 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 7,476.59 ` 349568 712112011 114236 USA BLUE BOOK \ 2,519.45 HYDRANT METERS 00001364 266728 433246 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,519.45 , 349569 7/21/2011 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. 13.24 PAGER 266515 U6096083G 1550.6188 TELEPHONE 7/19/2011 13:33:44 Page- 29 Business Unit UTILITY BALANCE SHEET EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTINGENCIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SPECIAL ACTIVITIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL GRILL GRILL DISTRIBUTION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/21/2011 - 7/21/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 278 88 PAGERS 266729 U0319246G 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 7/19/2011 13:33:44 Page- 30 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ' '1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES,. CENT SVC PW BUILDING 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5311.6511 292.12 POOL OPERATION 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 349570 712112011 5311.6511 101058 VAN PAPER CO. POOL OPERATION 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 54.25 CAN LINERS 00001553 266730 203877 -00 5320.5510 54.25 POOL CONCESSIONS 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 349571 712112011 5311.6511 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER POOL OPERATION 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 62.84 SAFETY GLASSES 00005190 266629 274853 5822.5513 62.84 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 349572 712112011 5842.5513 119454 VINOCOPIA YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 138.50 5822.5513 266570 0041548 -IN " 5822.5513 138.50 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 349573 712112011 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION. 14.75 BLEACH 266516 31299925 794.22 CONCESSION PRODUCT 266516 31299925 53.86 CAN LINERS. 266674 31308213 _ 1,118.32 CONCESSION PRODUCT 266674 31308213 53.86 Concessions and Cleaning 267014 31362224 943.07 Concessions and Cleaning 267014 31362224 453.43 Concessions 267015 31354202 115.90 Concessions and Cleaning 267016 31333587 992.63 Concessions and Cleaning 267016 31333587 4,540.04 349574 7/21/2011 102798 WEST PAYMENT CENTER 721.99 JUNE CHARGES 266517 823102914 721.99 349575 712112011 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 72.00 266571 273893 -00 1,095.80 266878. 27442700 521.90 266879 27442500 294.30 266880 27442800 1,984.00 349576 712112011 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1,047,75 266572 368006 404.48 266573 368657 1,12 266574 368656 7/19/2011 13:33:44 Page- 30 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ' '1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES,. CENT SVC PW BUILDING 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5311.6511 CLEAN_ ING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING' 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/19/2011 13:33:44 Council Check Register Page - 31 7/2112011 - 7/2112011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 650.08. 266773 368843 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 437.04 266881 369519 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 511.84 266882 369521 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 202.24 266883 369520 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 129,12 266884 369518 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,12 266885 368842 5842:5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 18.67- 266886 54035 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD' WINE 50TH ST SELLING 14.67- 266887 54036 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 40.90- 266888 54037 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 18.00- 266889 54054 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5.71- 266890 54055 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,286.84 349578 712112011 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 2,401.18 266575 596491 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,572.90 266576 595366 5822.5513 COST OF. GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 521.31 266577 598411 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 23.09- 266578 835283 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 30.00• 266579 835284 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 153.94- 266580 835566 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 78.58- .266581 835245 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 157.16- 266582 835092., 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,315.17 266891 595362 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,819.29 266892 599909 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,207.40 266893 599914 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 14,176.93 266894 . 599915 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS'SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 262.39 266895 599916 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 9,030.90 266896 595370 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 893.89 266897 595369 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,867.61 266898 599910 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 112.23 266899 601657 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,498.81 266900 601656 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 779.19 266901 599912 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 994.03 266902 599913 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 61.13 266903 599911 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 181.18 266904 596488 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 48,252.77 349579 7/2112011 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 5,509.38 266583, 771263 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 64.50 266584 771264 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 7/19/2011 13:33:44 RSSCKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 32 7/21/2011 - 7/21/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,228.65 266585 771076 5822.5514 COST OF GOODSSOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,167.30 266586 771293 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 107.70 266587 771294 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,124.18 266588 772179 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 45.00 266589 772180 5842.5515 COST OF.GOODS.SOLD,MIX YORK SELLING 3,798.35 266905 774175 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS :SOLD.BEER VERNON SELLING 1,664.00, 266906 774152 5842.5514 COST`OF.GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 23.50 266907 773936 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX- 50TH ST SELLING 2,394.25 266908 773935 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,342.00 Beer 00006337 267018 7725BB 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 431.70 Beer 00006337 267019 771092 5421.5514 COST-.OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 22,900.51 349580 712112011 101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY l 48.66 Course Pencils 00006327 267020 262362. 5410.6406 GENERAL`SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 48.66 349581 712112011 112752 WPS- MEDICARE PART BINS. CORP. 355.73 Ambulance Overpayment 267017 416005118 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 355.73 349582 712112011- 101726 XCEL ENERGY 5,095.91 51- 5888961 -7 266518 288131071 1375.6185 LIGHT & POWER PARKING RAMP 1,537.84 51- 5619094 -8 266519 288122099 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 379.32 51- 4197645 -8 266520 288111915 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 6,843.71 51- 6121102 -5 266521 288131895 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 4,116.90 51- 6840050 -6 266522 288145012' 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 17,973.68 349583 712112011 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 168.90 JUNE USAGE - PARK & REC 00004322 266630 055737456 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 249.42 JUNE USAGE - BLDG/ENG 00004322 266631 056004041 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 75.26 COPIER USAGE 266675 055737565 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 493.58 349584 712112011 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 199.04 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 00008079 266632 54067335 5510.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT ARENA ADMINISTRATION 199.04 696,045.08 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 696,045.08 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/21/2011 — 7121/2011 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Total Payments 696,045.08 7/19/2011 13:33:44 Page - 33 Business Unit R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 05100 ART,CENTER FUND Council Check Summary 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 7/21/2011 - 7121/2011 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 113,036.25 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 14,587.85 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 2,520.83 02400 BRAEMAR.MEMORIAL FUND 42.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 22,556.41 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 22,641.64 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 23,390.15 05100 ART,CENTER FUND 4,084.03 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 2,144.05 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 11,263.33 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 59,276.09 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 27,918.35 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 14,246.39 05800 LIQUOR FUND 188,868.29 05900 UTILITY FUND 87,039.06 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 39,033.37 05950 RECYCLING FUND 38,820.60 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 24,576.39 Report Totals 696,045.08 We wnfirm to the b= of-out bmiedge and belief, that these ;claims comply Wall materisl:respects with .the;requirements df thb City of Edina purchasing poll i®s nd Wet �7 uret Finance ®' _ or R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Council Check Register Page - 1 7/28/2011 - 7/28/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 349585 7128/2011 108757 3D SPECIALTIES 545.74 Posts 267211 436273 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 545.74 349586 712812011 100613 AAA 958.98 Plates for Ford Ranger 47 -222 00005292 267229 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 958.98 349587 712812011 101304 ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY 48.18 Lock Cylinder Slide/Key 00005287 267230 0129468 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 48.18 349588 712812011 100715 ACCLAIM BENEFITS 533.20 HRA Fee for Service 267057 0020665 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 199.00 Continuation: Election Packet 267058 0020722 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 732.20 349589 7128/2011 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 74.65 267133 0916661 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 43.60 267134 0620640 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 17.40 267135 0620639 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 70.60 267343 0814962 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 106.00 267400 587637 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 312.25 349590 712812011 100617 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL 96.43 Critter Control 00006293 267231 655797 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 26.00 Critter Control 00006293 267232 659284 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 124.43 349591 7128/2011 104710 ADAMS, MARK 100.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/1/11 267389 072511 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 100.00 349592 712812011 129368 ANDRIX, JUNE 1,354.00 Ambulance Overpayment 267059 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES. FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,354.00 349593 712812011 119976 AP LAWN 1,552.88 PLANTER BED WORK 267259 CTYED -0611 5630.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,552.88 R55CKREG LOG20000 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX CITY OF EDINA VERNON SELLING. COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING Council Check Register 7128/2011 — 712812011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 349594 712812011 101772 APCO INTERNATIONAL INC 92.00 Membership Dues 267060 1400.6105 92.00 349595 712812011 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 1,069.84 Food 00006333 267233 1591630 5421.5510 1,069.84 349596 712812011 118758 ASTLEFORD INTERNATIONAL 71,613.10 Single Axel Truck 267212 CJ626073 421305.6710 71,613.10 349597 712812011 126019 B & B PRODUCTS / RIGS AND SQUA 120.00 Squad 130 Siren 267061 3551 1400.6215 159.90 SQ138 PARTS 267260 3556 1400.6215 279.90 349598 712812011 100638 BACHMAN'S 1,635.43 Plants 00002320 267062 141532 5630.6620 1,635.43 349599 712812011 120814 BAGGALLINI INC. 52.41 BAG 267401 IVC00402794 5440.5511 52.41 349600 712812011 103241 BALDINGER, WENDY 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/2111 267390 072511 5631.6136 150.00 349601 7128/2011 102608 BAVARIAN MUSIKMEISTERS, THE 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/8/11 267396 072511 5631.6136 150.00 349602 7128/2011 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 404.67 267136 59190300 5862.5512 287.13 267137 85477400 5842.5515 390.20 267138 59188500 5862.5513 412.67 267139 59190200 5842.5512 1,670.38 267140 59188700 5842.5513 3,165.05 349603 712812011 129208 BENJAMIN FRANKLIN PLUMBING Subledger Account Description DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD 7/2712011 7:49:43 Page- 2 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING. COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 349604 712812011 349605 712812011 349606 712812011 349607 712812011 349608 7/2812011 349609 712812011 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Page - 3 Business Unit MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/4111 267393 072511 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 14.78 Calculator Tapes/Rolls 00001437 267214 69808 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 14.78 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 933.13 BALLASTS 00001430 267462 902579599 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 933.13 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 80.61 Lube Filters 00005212 267215 539150 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 80.61 121118 BRUESKE, JEFF CENT SVC PW BUILDING CITY HALL GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/9/11 267397 CITY OF EDINA 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 200.00 Council Check Register 7/28/2011 - 7128/2011 349610 7128/2011 Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,850.00 Sewer Liner Replacement 00001320 267213 A77917 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 1,850.00 INFIELD MIXTURE FIELD MAINTENANCE 396.73 101191 BENNEROTTE, JENNIFER 47.19 Mileage Reimbursement - J/F 267063 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 87.00 Mileage Reimbursement - March 267064 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 252.01 Mileage Reimbursement - A/M 267065 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 50.75 Mileage Reimbursement - June 267066 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 436.95 252.78 102954 BIG FUN SHOW 349612 7128/2011 113936 BUILDING MATERIAL SUPPLY INC. 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Page - 3 Business Unit MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNICATIONS 150.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/4111 267393 072511 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 150.00 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 14.78 Calculator Tapes/Rolls 00001437 267214 69808 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 14.78 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 933.13 BALLASTS 00001430 267462 902579599 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 933.13 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 80.61 Lube Filters 00005212 267215 539150 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 80.61 121118 BRUESKE, JEFF CENT SVC PW BUILDING CITY HALL GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 200.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/9/11 267397 072511 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 200.00 349610 7128/2011 100669 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC. 396.73 AGG LIME FOR FIELDS 00001415 267261 35907 1642.6542 INFIELD MIXTURE FIELD MAINTENANCE 396.73 349611 712812011 122074 BUIE, BARB 90.02 PETTY CASH 267262 07 -22 -11 5631.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 162.76 PETTY CASH 267262 07 -22 -11 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 252.78 349612 7128/2011 113936 BUILDING MATERIAL SUPPLY INC. 165.00 LOCKER PANEL 267263 29413 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 165.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/2712011 7:49:43 Council Check Register Page - 4 7/28/2011 -7/28/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 349613 7/28/2011 103244 BURTIS, ROBERT 175.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/9/11 267398 072511 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 175.00 349614 712812011 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 297.42 267402 922577946 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 297.42- 267403 922657849 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 583.54 MERCHANDISE 267404 922711150 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,043.52 267405 922715554 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 505.30 267406 922715590 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 237.72 267407 922711028 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,370.08 349615 7/2812011 120935 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 9,735.75 Legal 267234 2851G -6/11 1195.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES 9,735.75 349616 712812011 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 211.90 267141 934997 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 16.20 267142 934996 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 3,890.95 267143 934994 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 723.25 267144 00010041 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 46.60 267145 934993 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,888.90 349617 712812011 100223 CASS COUNTY 200.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 267408 072111 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 200.00 349618 712812011 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 490.00 267146 90761 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 68.50- 267147 90620 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 342.00 267344 90739 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 763.50 349619 712812011 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES IN 853.89 267409 2218472 5620.6186 HEAT EDINBOROUGH PARK 11,031.61 267410 2218952 5311.6186 HEAT POOL OPERATION 11,885.50 349620 7128/2011 119726 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Council Check Register Page - 5 7/28/2011 —7/28/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 232.85 267148 450316 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 810.20 267345 449877 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 101.75 267346 449641 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,144.80 349621 712812011 123148 CHRISTIANSEN, STEVE 19.25 Mileage Reimbursement 267067 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 19.25 349622 7/2812011 101663 CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF 60.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 267463 WAYNE 1240.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL HOULE -2011 60.00 349623 712812011 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 45,926.50 Joint Powers - 2nd Quarter 267068 51026 1490.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH 45,926.50 349624 7128/2011 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 79.55 Sewer & Water 267069 00102561- 020086 5821.6189 SEWER & WATER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 2003 196.44 Sewer & Water 267070 00102561 - 020316 5861.6189 SEWER & WATER VERNON OCCUPANCY 3003 80.72 00077443 - 0200650027 267411 200650027 -7/11 1646.6189 SEWER & WATER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 356.71 349625 712812011 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 3,422.78 SCBA CART & REELS 00003510 267264 139778 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3,422.78 349626 712812011 100692 COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 203.00 267149 0148234126 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 203.00 349627 712812011 129363 COCKERILL, RICHARD 1,113.62 Ambulance Overpayment 267071 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,113.62 349628 712812011 120433 COMCAST 105.31 INTERNET SERVICE 267265 8772 10 614 5631.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 0396908 105.31 CITY OF EDINA 7/27/2011 7:49:43 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 6 7128/2011 - 7/2812011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 349629 7/28/2011 124118 COMPLETE COOLING SERVICES 180.72 Radiator 00005280 267072 15077 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 180.72 349630 712812011 123261 CONSTITUTION STATE SERVICES LL 3,054.50 Workers Compensation 267073 1548767 1470.6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3,054.50 Workers Compensation 267073 1548767 1400.6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 6,109.00 349631 712812011 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 14.96 ELEMENT 00009171 267412 R200372247 5111.6530 REPAIR PARTS ART CENTER BLDG /MAIM 306.30 KILN SHELVES, ELEMENTS 00009166 267413 INV000061802 5111.6530 REPAIR PARTS ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 28.86 SPONGES 00009131 267414 R200372354 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 350.12 349632 712812011 122376 CORPORATE CONNECTION 485.39 Safety Vests 00001352 267216 3832 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 485.39 349633 7/28/2011 105570 CULLIGAN SOFT WATER SERVICE 50.14 Refund - Job Cancelled 267074 ED107642 1495.4112 PLUMBING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 50.14 349634 712812011 101418 CUMMINS NPOWER LLC 29.87 Dampener 00005243 267235 100 -38731 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 243.45 Solenoid 00005243 267236 100 -38665 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 273.32 349635 7128/2011 104020 DALCO 115.51 Spot Remover 00006330 267237 2353265 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 115.51 349636 7128/2011 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 1,568.00 267150 609523 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 44.80 267151 609524 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 3,779.60 267152 609525 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,604.55 267347 609522 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 7,996.95 349637 7/2812011 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 94.03 Hammer, pry bar set 00005124 267217 598398 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA ABERCROMBIE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 177.61 Council Check Register 349641 712812011 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 7/28/2011 -7/2812011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 148.75 35.00 Phaser Light 00005237 267218 598335 1553.6556 TOOLS 121546 DICK, KENNA 27.25 Wrenches 00005214 267219 600515 1553.6556 TOOLS Various Reimbursements 267075 275.80 Chisels, Screwdrivers 00005214 267220 600480 1553.6556 TOOLS 432.08 349643 7128/2011 115356 DIEKMAN, LARRY 349638 712812011 122135 DENFELD, SCOTT 40.75 PREPAID CELL PHONE 00001583 267464 072211 4090.6406 165.28 ITUNES 267266 07 -22 -11 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 349644 712812011 165.28 126742 DUCHARME, RICHARD 349639 712812011 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 072511 4077.6103 206.00 106.98 Bakery 00006329 267238 375908 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 119716 EASTERN PACIFIC APPAREL INC. 61.69 Bakery 00006329 267239 375781 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD MERCHANDISE 267418 64.61 Bakery 00006329 267240 376196 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 95.17 Bakery 00006329 267241 375916 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 117.78 BAKERY 267415 376418 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 446.23 349640 7128/2011 128372 DETLOFF MANAGEMENT 17761 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 267416 5181 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Page - 7 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COMMUNICATIONS GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL UTILITY BALANCE SHEET TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES ABERCROMBIE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 177.61 349641 712812011 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 148.75 650487671 267417 650487671 -7/11 5511.6188 148.75 349642 712812011 121546 DICK, KENNA 177.46 Various Reimbursements 267075 1400.6104 177.46 349643 7128/2011 115356 DIEKMAN, LARRY 40.75 PREPAID CELL PHONE 00001583 267464 072211 4090.6406 40.75 349644 712812011 126742 DUCHARME, RICHARD 206.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 267473 072511 4077.6103 206.00 349645 7/2812011 119716 EASTERN PACIFIC APPAREL INC. 1,362.63 MERCHANDISE 267418 462657 5440.5511 1,362.63 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Page - 7 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COMMUNICATIONS GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL UTILITY BALANCE SHEET TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/28/2011 -7/28/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 349646 712812011 113116 EDINA CHEERLEADING 1,040.00 Summer CheerleadingCamp 267076 1600.4390 1,040.00 349647 712812011 102758 ELDER-JONES BLDG PERMIT SERIVC 223.40 Refund - Job Cancelled 267077 ED106748 1495.4111 223.40 349648 7/2812011 126805 ELECTRONIC CENTER 25.14 Ground Assembly 00001574 267242 719614 1325.6406 25.14 349649 712812011 129383 ELITE H2O 129.60 ARTESIAN BOTTLED WATER 267420 6325 5440.5511 129.60 349650 712812011 101956 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC 413.91 T -90 REPAIRS 267267 55016 1470.6180 413.91 349651 7/2812011 126914 EMERSON NETWORK POWER 901.56 UPS 00001771 267221 S13751295 5913.6103 901.56 349652 712812011 129374 EXCEL CONCRETE 7,700.00 Masonary Work 267243 11152 7413.6710 7,700.00 349653 712812011 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 59.40 Brake Pads 00005188 267078 70061311 1553.653C 59.40 Brake Pads 00005188 267079 69042546 1553.653C 247.48 Rotors 00005188 267244 69042854 1553.653C 67.78 Bearings 00005188 267245 69042829 1553.653C 58.81 Connector 00005188 267246 13681254 1553.653C 48.48 Blower Motor 00005188 267247 13681558 1553.653C 19.19 Limited Slip 00005188 267248 69043051 1553.653C 560.54 349654 712812011 102101 FEDEX OFFICE 28.96 POSTAGE 00006364 267421 062200022894 5440.6122 28.96 Subledger Account Description CHEERLEEDING CAMP BUILDING PERMITS GENERAL SUPPLIES 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Page- 8 Business Unit PARK ADMIN. GENERAL INSPECTIONS STREET NAME SIGNS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PSTF FIRE TOWER REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADVERTISING OTHER PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7128/2011 —7/28/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 349655 7128/2011 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 1,861.57 2" Compound H2O Meter 00001383 267222 S01314804.001 5914.5516 1,861.57 349656 712812011 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. 425.00 ROWay Web Application 267080 21957 1260.6103 425.00 349657 7128/2011 101512 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPANY 96.19 Proofer Basket 00001382 267223 14366 5923.6406 96.19 349658 712812011 102015 FLOWERS OF EDINA 97.62 Flowers 267081 6590 1500.6103 97.62 349659 7/2812011 101475 FOOTJOY 190.17 SHOES 267422 3821622 5440.5511 1,602.14 SHOES 267423 3821450 5440.5511 1,792.31 349660 712812011 105188 G R MECHANICAL 8,375.00 WATER SOFTENER 00007017 267465 10430 5311.6406 8,375.00 349661 7/2812011 117293 GAMETIME 47.98 PARTS FOR PLAYGROUNDS 00001269 267268 798899 1647.6530 47.98 349662 712812011 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 669.32 MERCHANDISE 267424 40496106 5440.5511 1,440.42 267425 40496105 5440.5511 2,109.74 349663 712812011 105508 GEMPLER'S INC. 121.85 Clothing Allowance 00001428 267082 1017578043 1640.6201 121.85 349664 712812011 124541 GEYEN GROUP 454.22 Carpet Clean 00006344 267249 21386 5420.6180 454.22 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Page- 9 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD METERS TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP LAUNDRY CONTRACTED REPAIRS PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES POOL OPERATION PATHS & HARD SURFACE PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL CLUB HOUSE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/28/2011 -7128/2011 / Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 349665 712812011 101351 GILBERT MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS 489.12 Contracted Repair 267083 96795 5311.6180 254.34 CONTRACTED REPAIR 267269 96848 5311.6180 743.46 349666 712812011 101103 GRAINGER 5.18 Socket 00002308 267084 9577406078 5630.6406 76.52 Wheels & Socket 00002308 267085 9577406060 5630.6406 112.00 Glove, Hearing Protection 00005278 267224 9584017314 4090.6406 195.48 Glove, Hearing Protection 00005278 267224 9584017314 1553.6610 48.42 Leak Gauge 00005210 267225 9581585271 1553.6530 91.82 GENERAL SUPPLIES 267273 9581205243 5841.6406 529.42 349667 7/2812011 120201 GRANICUS INC. 180.00 WEBSTREAMING- AUGUST 267275 28041 2210.6103 180.00 349668 712812011 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 491.25 267153 112370S 5862.5513 493.50 267154 1125685 5862.5513 984.75 349669 712812011 100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT 227.33 FORESTRY & MOWING SUPPLIES 00001520 267278 98807 1644.6406 227.33 349670 7/2812011 104482 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 3,775.00 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 00001390 267426 11 -4-18 1646.6180 3,775.00 349671 7/28/2011 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 158.85 Paper Supplies 00007515 267250 98708 5842.6512 158.85 349672 712812011 102312 HARMON INC. 213.36 WINDOW REPLACEMENT 00001534 267427 14418 1646.6180 213.36 349673 712812011 125270 HARTFORD -PRIORITY ACCOUNTS 3,071.91 PREMIUM 267428 5460157-0 9900.2033.16 3,071.91 Subledger Account Description CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES SAFETY EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Page - 10 Business Unit POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN YORK OCCUPANCY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES TREES & MAINTENANCE CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTENANCE PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTENANCE LTD - 99 PAYROLL CLEARING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/28/2011 — 7/28/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 349674 712812011 120227 HARTSHORN, BOB 58.65 Softball Tournament Water /Pop 267226 1628.4392.03 SENIOR SOFTBALL COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Page- 11 Business Unit SENIOR CITIZENS GRILL GRILL RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CIVILIAN DEFENSE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION PAINT CUSTOMER REFUND CENTENNIAL LAKES UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 58.65 349675 712812011 101576 HEGGIES PIZZA 101.45 PIZZA 267429 1709706 5421.5510 101.45 349676 7/2812011 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 282.24 MEAT PATTIES 267430 023315 5421.5510 282.24 349677 7128/2011 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 656.00 Radio Admin Fee 00001475 267227 110638078 1553.6237 656.00 Radio Admin Fee 267228 210118078 1553.6237 160.31 TECHNICAL SUPPORT 267284 110662024 1190.6105 32.00 RADIO FEE - HEALTH DEPT 267298 110638113 1460.6230 1,504.31 349678 712812011 127282 HEUN ENTERPRISES INC. 369.00 267155 2929 5862.5512 369.00 349679 712812011 101073 HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES INC. 790.25 BARRICADE & TRAFFIC CONE RENID0007083 267303 412366 -001 1627.6103 782.74 BARRICADE & CONE RENTAL 00007082 267306 412365 -001 1627.6103 1,572.99 349680 712812011 101271 HINDING, CHRIS 150.00 FARMERS MARKET 8/4/11 267394 072511 5631.6136 150.00 349681 712812011 100805 HIRSHFIELD'S 40.75 Paint 00002327 267086 003450862 5630.6532 40.75 349682 712812011 129375 HOFFMAN, GREG 1,005.68 Refund for incorrect payment 267256 5900.2015 1,005.68 349683 712812011 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Page- 11 Business Unit SENIOR CITIZENS GRILL GRILL RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CIVILIAN DEFENSE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SPECIAL ACTIVITIES PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION PAINT CUSTOMER REFUND CENTENNIAL LAKES UTILITY BALANCE SHEET R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Council Check Register Page - 12 7/28/2011 —7/28/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,611.02 267156 566758 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,611.02 349684 712812011 103302 HONEYWELL CONCERT BAND 40.00 CL PERFORMANCE 817111 267395 072511 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 40.00 349685 712812011 120883 HUBBARD, BRIAN 121.00 DIRE Training Reimbursement 267087 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 121.00 349686 7/2812011 122565 HYSER, TIMOTHY 128.75 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 267475 072511 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 128.75 349687 712812011 101714 IDENTISYS INC. 69.51 Blank ID Cards 00004347 267088 70968 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 69.51 349688 7128/2011 122313 IN THE NEWS INC. 197.00 Flowrider Plaque 267089 976280 5310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION 197.00 349689 712512011 128368 INDEPENDENT STATIONERS 214.72 Toner, Folders, Pens 00001564 267257 000061233 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 214.72 349690 7/2812011 105694 INFRATECH 3,978.09 LINE LOCATOR, STICKS 00001625 267466 1100351 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 3,978.09 349691 712812011 119808 INTEGRA TELECOM 90.51 Phone and Internet 267258 8547430 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 90.51 349692 712812011 129359 IPMA - HR MINNESOTA 20.00 Meeting Fee 267090 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION 20.00 349693 7/28/2011 124330 JEFF MARTIN COMPANY 1,982.50 Remove & Replace Light Pole 00001547 267271 6344 1322.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 1,982.50 R55CKREG LOG20000 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN CITY OF EDINA 39.05 Council Check Register 1575741 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 7/28/2011 -7128/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 349694 712812011 50TH ST SELLING 102136 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SERVICE 267348 1575743 27.76 Latch 00005241 267091 0017551 1553.6530 6,755.69 27.76 1575742 5862.5514 349695 7128/2011 VERNON SELLING 102146 JESSEN PRESS 267350 1575753 7,512.00 About Town 267092 28682 2210.6123 35.10 7,512.00 1575751 5842.5515 Subledger Account Description REPAIR PARTS 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Page 13 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 349696 712812011 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 39.05 267157 1575741 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 3,853.82 267158 1575740 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 30.00 267348 1575743 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 6,755.69 267349 1575742 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 787.00 267350 1575753 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 35.10 267351 1575751 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 19.20- 267352 1161080 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 7,666.85 267353 1575750 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 19,148.31 349697 7128/2011 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 596.14 Irrigation Repair Parts 00001509 267093 58523946 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 202.84 Irrigation Repair Parts 00001508 267094 58519159 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 798.98 349698 7/28/2011 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 100.00- 267159 501765 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 48.56- 267160 502956 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,390.88 267161 1099798 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 531.42 267162 1099801 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 108.21 267163 1099797 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 337.40 267164 1095765 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 657.24, 267354 1099794 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 94.11 267355 1099792 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 309.86 267356 1099790 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,297.77 267357 1099791 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,793.26 267358 1099795 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,213.26 267359 1099793 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 66.33 267360 1099789 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,889.35 267361 1099788 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING .56 267362 1099787 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,483.69 267363 1099799 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Council Check Register Page - 14 7128/2011 - 7128/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,851.07 267364 1099800 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,052.12 267365 1099796 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING .19 267431 1099784 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 20,928.16 349699 712812011 112872 JOHNSON, ERIC 24.05 ART WORK SOLD 267432 072111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 24.05 349700 712812011 104369 KARKHOFF, NANCY 60.92 UNIFORM REIMBURSEMENT 267308 07 -22 -11 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 60.92 349701 7/28/2011 111018 KEEPRS INC. 559.96 UNIFORMS 00003561 267313 166179 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 766.96 UNIFORMS 00003541 267315 166204 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 79.99 UNIFORMS 00003580 267319 166202 -02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 159.98 UNIFORMS 00003580 267323 166202 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 79.99 UNIFORMS 00003580 267325 166202 -01 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 22.44 GLOCK MAGAZINE OOOONATE 267326 163415 -01 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,669.32 349702 7128/2011 100841 KEPRIOS, JOHN 91.09 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 267478 072511 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 91.09 349703 712812011 121495 KIDZSMART CONCEPTS INC. 1,100.00 Edinborough Park Poster Design 267095 35628 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 1,100.00 349704 7128/2011 129376 KOSHAREK, KATHY 74.00 Class Refund 267272 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 74.00 349705 712812011 129365 LA VALLEUR COMMUNICATES 60.00 Parade Photos 267096 0774563 2210.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 60.00 349706 712812011 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 287.09 Screws, Washers. Fittings 00005192 267097 0615983 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 514.92 Fittings, adapters, bits 00005281 267274 0633056 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 802.01 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Page- 15 Subledger Account Description Business Unit SAFETY EQUIPMENT POOL ADMINISTRATION LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS ADMINISTRATION CENT SERV GEN - MIS INSPECTIONS GENERAL (BILLING) ASSESSING FINANCE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS GLEASON WATER TOWER REHAB AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT FAIRVIEW FEE PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT ARENA ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 7/28/2011 —7/28/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 349707 7/2812011 100225 LIFEGUARD STORE INC, THE 37.85 Mask 267276 057914 5310.6610 23.50- CREDIT 267433 RTNO03435 5311.6201 14.35 349708 712812011 106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC. 116.58 Copier 00005285 267277 1271012 1553.6406 116.58 349709 712812011 100858 LOGIS 1,202.00 LOGIS 267098 33823 1554.6160 2,535.00 LOGIS 267098 33823 1120.6160 3,079.00 LOGIS 267098 33823 1554.6160 3,126.00 LOGIS 267098 33823 1495.6160 5,193.00 LOGIS 267098 33823 5910.6160 5,215.00 LOGIS 267098 33823 1190.6160 5,942.00 LOGIS 267098 33823 1160.6160 26,292.00 349710 7/2812011 101453 LUT7, RICHARD M. 198.75 UNIFORM PURCHASE 267434 072111 1400.6203 198.75 349711 712812011 129384 M.K. PAINTING INC. 104,737.50 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 267455 072911 05509.1705.30 104,737.50 349712 712812011 129364 MAHON, AMBROSE 1,430.00 Ambulance Overpayment 267099 1470.4329 1,430.00 349713 712812011 117804 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI 1,075.00 Audit Final Payment 267100 29447 4502.6130 1,500.00 Audit Final Payment 267100 29447 5510.6130 4,500.00 Audit Final Payment 267100 29447 1500.6103 5,500.00 Audit Fees 267100 29447 1160.6103 12,575.00 349714 712812011 117804 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI 5,721.00 SMTF Audit Final Pmt 267279 29442 7410.6103 5,721.00 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Page- 15 Subledger Account Description Business Unit SAFETY EQUIPMENT POOL ADMINISTRATION LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS ADMINISTRATION CENT SERV GEN - MIS INSPECTIONS GENERAL (BILLING) ASSESSING FINANCE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS GLEASON WATER TOWER REHAB AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT FAIRVIEW FEE PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT ARENA ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FINANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/28/2011 —7128/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 349715 7128/2011 124000 MARTIN, KAYLIN 29.33 Mileage Reimbursement 267101 1400.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 1643.6556 5420.6406 1646.6406 5630.6406 1642.6406 5410.6230 1553.6530 1553.6180 1400.6160 03461.1705.30 05510.1705.30 01384.1705.30 04374.1705.30 01370.1705.30 04376.1705.30 TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Page - 16 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL TURF CARE CLUB HOUSE BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES FIELD MAINTENANCE SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS DATA PROCESSING CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SS-461 RIDGE RD RECONSTRUCTION WM -510 RIDGE RD RECONSTRUCTION RIDGE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION STS -374 RIDGE ROAD BA -370 CARSONS HILL RECON CARSONS HILL RECON 29.33 349716 7128/2011 101483 MENARDS 60.52 Greenhouse Tools 00001510 267103 1344 20.01 Paint 00006288 267280 98460 29.34 BUILDING MATERIALS 00001511 267327 1957 109.87 349717 712812011 101987 MENARDS 85.55 Weed Killer, Sprayer 00002315 267102 5121 85.55 349718 712812011 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 138.88 SOCCER NET 00001512 267328 133763 138.88 349719 712812011 100885 METRO SALES INC 586.70 Copier 00006345 267281 415793 586.70 349720 7128/2011 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAI 4.01 Diode 00005213 267282 476565 158.73 Front Speaker Repair 00005290 267283 189088 162.74 349721 712812011 104650 MICRO CENTER 284.20 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 00003083 267435 3417533 284.20 349722 7128/2011 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 669.75- PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 267456 071511 2,086.20 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 267456 071511 81,553.70 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 267456 071511 132,148.23 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 267456 071511 215,118.38 349723 712812011 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 4,961.88 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 267472 072911 16,186.10 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 267472 072911 1643.6556 5420.6406 1646.6406 5630.6406 1642.6406 5410.6230 1553.6530 1553.6180 1400.6160 03461.1705.30 05510.1705.30 01384.1705.30 04374.1705.30 01370.1705.30 04376.1705.30 TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Page - 16 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL TURF CARE CLUB HOUSE BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES FIELD MAINTENANCE SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS DATA PROCESSING CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SS-461 RIDGE RD RECONSTRUCTION WM -510 RIDGE RD RECONSTRUCTION RIDGE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION STS -374 RIDGE ROAD BA -370 CARSONS HILL RECON CARSONS HILL RECON s R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/28/2011 — 7/28/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 23,493.50 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 267472 072911 05512.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 33 653 75 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 267472 072911 03462.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BUILDING PERMITS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Page - 17 Business Unit CARSONS HILL RECON SS-462 CARSONS HILL RECON INSPECTIONS DISTRIBUTION VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 78,295.23 349724 712812011 129366 MILLER, SCOTT 23.80 Refund - Job Cancelled 267104 ED105795 1495.4111 23.80 349725 7/28/2011 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,960.00 Replace H2O Service 00001379 267106 33886 5913.6180 1,960.00 349726 7/2812011 127062 MINNEHAHA BLDG. MAINT. INC. 16.03 Window Cleaning 267107 921086209 5861.6180 21.38 Window Cleaning 267107 921086209 5841.6180 37.41 349727 712812011 117837 MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSOCIAT 150.00 Operator Refresher Course 00001354 267285 5919.6104 150.00 349728 712812011 103240 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL 528.86 Defensive Driving - 6/11 267286 14470 1628.6103 528.86 349729 7128/2011 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 26.72 Shear Aluminum 00005283 267287 0090344 1553.6530 35.32 SPRAYER PARTS 00002329 267329 0090354 -IN 5630.6406 62.04 349730 7/2812011 128914 MINUTEMAN PRESS 63.99 1,000 FORMS -DOG LICENSE 267330 9642 1400.6575 63.99 349731 712812011 102169 MOONLIGHTSERENADERS 100.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8110/11 267399 072511 5631.6136 100.00 349732 7128/2011 129377 MOSBORG, PREBEN 98.00 Refund Trip 267290 1628.4392.07 98.00 BUILDING PERMITS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Page - 17 Business Unit CARSONS HILL RECON SS-462 CARSONS HILL RECON INSPECTIONS DISTRIBUTION VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7128/2011 —7/28/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 349733 7128/2011 102395 MOSE, WILLIAM 566.50 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 267476 072511 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5630.6406 5630.6530 05473.1705.30 5842.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 5842.5513 5630.6250 5932.6103 1400.6513 05515.1705.30 04379.1705.30 01373.1705.30 08057.1705.30 04369.1705.30 05503.1705.30 GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Page - 18 Business Unit EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES WM-473 NEW TREATMENT PLANT #6 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 566.50 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 349734 712812011 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 144.82 Tee Markers 00002326 267108 79692600 81.61 Various Parts 00002323 267109 80009300 226.43 349735 7/2812011 110522 MUNICIPAL BUILDERS INC. 161,975.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 267458 072911 161,975.00 349736 7/2812011 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 200.00- 267165 179.00 267166 67447 387.50 267167 67572 500.50 267366 67573 867.00 349737 712812011 122989 NISCAYAH INC. 572.91 Alarm Service Contract 267110 SC0016051 572.91 349738 712812011 129361 NOEL, CLAUDIA 132.23 Reimb. for Tow 267111 132.23 349739 712812011 117830 NORTHLAND BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC 107.82 REPLACE OLYMPUS FOOTCONTROL 267331 IN29109 107.82 349740 712812011 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC. 7,348.73 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 267459 072911 44,886.07 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 267459 072911 121,027.96 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 267459 072911 173,262.76 349741 712812011 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC. 3,367.27 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 267460 063011 14,495.15 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 267460 063011 15,909.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 267460 063011 5630.6406 5630.6530 05473.1705.30 5842.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 5842.5513 5630.6250 5932.6103 1400.6513 05515.1705.30 04379.1705.30 01373.1705.30 08057.1705.30 04369.1705.30 05503.1705.30 GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Page - 18 Business Unit EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES WM-473 NEW TREATMENT PLANT #6 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING ALARM SERVICE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES OFFICE SUPPLIES CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CENTENNIAL LAKES GENERAL STORM SEWER POLICE DEPT. GENERAL OSCAR ROBERTS RECON OSCAR ROBERTS RECON BA -373 OSCAR ROBERTS RECON L -57 W 70TH ST RECON STS -369 W 70TH STREET WM -503 W70TH ST TRAFFIC STUDY CITY OF EDINA 7/27/2011 7:49:43 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 19 7/2812011 - 7/28/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 19,415.95 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 267460 063011 06043.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS TS-43 W 70TH ST RECON 27,371.68 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 267460 063011 06044.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS TS-44 W 70TH ST RECON 168,718.77 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 267460 063011 03457.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SS-457 W70TH TS IMPLEMENTATION 249,277.82 349742 7/28/2011 102712 OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOG 364.32 267436 W11060665 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 23.12 267437 W11060659 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 23.12 267437 W11060659 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 46.24 267437 W11060659 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 46.24 267437 W11060659 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 69.36 267437 W11060659 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 92.48 267437 W11060659 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 92.48 267437 W11060659 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 115.60 267437 W11060659 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 138.72 267437 W11060659 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 156.55 267437 W11060659 5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 165.50 267437 W11060659 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 206.83 267437 W11060659 5631.6188 TELEPHONE CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 206.84 267437 W11060659 5621.6188 TELEPHONE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 323.68 267437 W11060659 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 675.84 267437 W11060659 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 2,746.92 349743 7128/2011 129367 ORENSTEIN, MAX 19.25 Mileage Reimbursement 267112 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 57.73 Mileage Reimbursement 267113 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 76.98 349744 712812011 101659 ORION PEST CONTROL 126.56 PEST CONTROL 267467 66497061 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 126.56 349745 7/28/2011 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 141.10 Cookies 267291 666648 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 379.17 Cookies 00006339 267292 80685892 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 520.27 349746 7128/2011 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 1,018.46 Repair A/C 00002328 267114 41355 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,018.46 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Council Check Register Page - 20 7/28/2011 -7/2812011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 349747 7/2812011 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 53,948.36 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 267461 071311 01334.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -334 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 97,134.59 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 267461 071311 03460.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 383,683.17 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 267461 071311 05511.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 534,766.12 349748 712812011 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 259.25 267168 8312398 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 658.00 267169 8312380 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 480.75 267170 8312391 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,398.00 349749 712812011 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 268.50 267171 67641836 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 158.00 267172 68751593 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 228.10 Pepsi 267288 71405519 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 1,124.52 Pepsi 00006327 267289 71405518 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 1,779.12 349750 7128/2011 100950 PETTY CASH 1.25 Petty Cash 267324 1120.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION 4.95 Petty Cash 267324 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 6.62 Petty Cash 267324 1490.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC HEALTH 8.57 Petty Cash 267324 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 8.57 Petty Cash 267324 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 12.40 Petty Cash 267324 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL 13.27 Petty Cash 267324 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 13.74 Petty Cash 267324 1160.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE FINANCE 17.34 Petty Cash 267324 1140.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLANNING 20.00 Petty Cash 267324 1160.6106 MEETING EXPENSE FINANCE 21.50 Petty Cash 267324 1140.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PLANNING 22.44 Petty Cash 267324 5910.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERAL (BILLING) 24.72 Petty Cash 267324 2210.6106 MEETING EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 25.00 Petty Cash 267324 1600.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 25.00 Petty Cash 267324 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION 25.00 Petty Cash 267324 1490.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH 26.29 Petty Cash 267324 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 28.13 Petty Cash 267324 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES , PLAYGROUND & THEATER 40.69 Petty Cash 267324 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 42.00 Petty Cash 267324 1190.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING 42.68 Petty Cash 267324 5310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION 42.90 Petty Cash 267324 5510.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7128/2011 - 7/2812011 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Page- 21 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 56.00 Petty Cash 267324 1190.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ASSESSING 74.63 Petty Cash 267324 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 79.20 Petty Cash 267324 5840.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 105.00 Petty Cash 267324 5860.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 109.39 Petty Cash 267324 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 897.28 349751 7/28/2011 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 2,676.96 267173 2099367 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 656.40 267174 2097017 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 503.51 267367 2099360 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,303.40 267368 2099366 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 548.32 267369 2099366 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 748.16 267370 2099359 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,067.06 267371 2099363 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,655.91 267372 2099365 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 922.19 267373 2099364 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 14,081.91 349752 7128/2011 121321 PLOOF, JASON 120.00 Excalibur Rental Refund 267115 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 120.00 349753 7128/2011 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 135.00 Scrap Tire Disposal 00005189 267293 548855 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 127.13 Tires 00005189 267294 548824 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 262.13 349754 712812011 129378 PORTH, LORI .73 Daily Admission Refund 267295 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 10.00 Daily Admission Refund 267295 5301.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 10.73 349755 7128/2011 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 722.10 LINERS, SOAP, TOWELS, ETC 00002330 267332 5260 5630.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 802.27 TISSUE, WIPES, BROOMS 00008053 267438 5246 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,524.37 349756 7128/2011 100971 QUALITY WINE 1,824.64 267175 48421900 5642.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 37.20 267176 48422000 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 286.80 267177 48413300 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 1,592.51 1,483.23 560.63 1,432.12 1,266.01 »s 3n 349757 CITY OF EDINA 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Council Check Register Page - 22 7/2812011 - 7/28/2011 267296 9529441841536 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 267178 48402500 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 267179 48404400 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 267180 48402600 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 267181 48413500 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 267182 48422100 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 267183 48413600 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 267374 484134 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 349757 712812011 123898 QWEST 57.58 Phone 267296 9529441841536 1640.6188 58.62 952 944 -6522 267439 6522 -7/11 5511.6188 151.33 952 285 -2951 267440 2951 -7/11 1470.6188 267.53 349758 7/2812011 124537 RALPH, ROBERT 669.50 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 267474 072511 4077.6103 669.50 349759 7128/2011 104450 RAPID GRAPHICS & MAILING INC. 88.71 WATER BILLS 267333 6091 5910.6103 88.71 349760 712812011 105807 RAY ALLEN MANUFACTURING CO. IN 139.95 K9 Sleeve 00003071 267116 267584 4607.6406 139.95 349761 7128/2011 125321 REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS 264.00 Enrollment 267117 9104 1600.4390.52 100.00 FACILITATION OF HIP HOP 267334 9106 1624.6406 364.00 349762 7128/2011 129385 RELIABLE TREE SERVICE INC. 1,000.00 REMOVAL/DISPOSAL OF 2 TREES 00001476 267468 11111 5932.6103 1,000.00 349763 7/2812011 119854 RHINO 486.75 Locating Stakes 00001358 267297 39666 5923.6406 486.75 349764 7/28/2011 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 619.88 SOFTENER SALT 00008087 267441 00254343 5511.6406 TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION REACH EDUCATION SOLUTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER COLLECTION SYSTEMS ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS CITY OF EDINA 7/27/2011 7:49:43 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 23 7/2812011 -7/28/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 619.88 349765 7/2812011 101979 ROFIDAL, KEVIN 890.00 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 267442 072511 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 890.00 349766 7/2812011 100985 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO 364.27 Coils 00005284 267299 C68385 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 295.60 313 Pull Box Repair 00005286 267300 7785 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 659.87 349767 7/2812011 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 44.22 Bakery 00006349 267301 317604 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 44.22 349768 7128/2011 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 28.39 101 = - -*9350 267443 072011 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 8.00 101 - *9350 267469 072211 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 36.39 349769 7/2812011 118168 SANSIO 50.00 EMS FAXING 267335 INV -02250 -2011 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 733.00 EMS SUBSCRIPTION 267336 INV- 02500 -2011 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 783.00 349770 7128/2011 129379 SAUNDERS, BARBARA 12.19 Art Work Sold 267302 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 12.19 349771 712812011 119799 SCHIMETZ, SCOTT 206.00 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 267477 072511 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 206.00 349772 7/2812011 100991 SCHWAB - VOLLHABER - LUBRATT 521.82 HVAC REPAIRS 267470 INVO65714 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 521.82 349773 712812011 129372 SENIOR SOFTBALL USA LEAGUES 240.00 Team Fee 267251 801 1628.4392.03 SENIOR SOFTBALL SENIOR CITIZENS 240.00 349774 7128/2011 103249 SHANNON, JIM R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Council Check Register Page - 24 7/28/2011 - 7/28/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 140.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/2/11 267391 072511 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 140.00 349775 7/28/2011 129380 SHORT ELLIOT HENDRICKSON INC. 1,731.08 Architect Services 267304 246174 47073.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT VETERANS MEMORIAL 1,731.08 349776 712812011 120761 SIEMENS INDUSTRY INC. 341.00 Keyless Entry System Repair 00007080 267305 5442071523 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 341.00 349777 7/28/2011 129381 SIMMONS, STEVEN 250.00 Softball Team Entry 267307 927 1628.4392.03 SENIOR SOFTBALL SENIOR CITIZENS 250.00 349778 7/28/2011 103339 SMITHSHARPE FIRE BRICK SUPPLY 382.97 Kiln 00009173 267309 112269 5100.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT ART CENTER BALANCE SHEET 382.97 349779 7/28/2011 122800 SOUTH METRO CARPET & UPHOLSTER 224.44 Carpet Cleaning 267118 821 5861.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS VERNON OCCUPANCY 336.66 Carpet Cleaning 267118 821 5821.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 561.10 349780 7128/2011 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 337.00 267184 1161079 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 520.00 267185 1559256 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 96.00- 267186 1563471 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 117.90 267187 1495412 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 222.00- 267188 1565882 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 724.50 267189 1594046 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,074.25 267190 1590626 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 249.00 267191 1590625 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,476.00 267375 1594048 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 278.90 267376 1495411 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,459.55 349781 7/28/2011 102826 SPECIAL OPERATIONS TRAINING AS 135.00 Jason Behr K9 Training 00003079 267119 34793073 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 135.00 349782 7128/2011 102251 ST. ANDREWS PRODUCTS CO R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/28/2011 - 7/2812011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 126.40 BAGS FOR SHOP 267444 0000651034 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Page - 25 Business Unit PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY 126.80 349788 7/28/2011 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 710.00 267192 Z00385 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 960.00 267193 Z00387 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 995.00 267377 Z00384 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 349789 7/28/2011 122511 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 1,035.00 7/147/28 Movies in the Park 267125 DB1586729 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 1,035.00 349790 712812011 104932 TAYLOR MADE 404.96 GOLF CLUBS 267445 16269740 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 123.58 MERCHANDISE 267446 16281737 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 126.40 349783 7/28/2011 116175 ST. CROIX HARLEY- DAVIDSON 36.93 H Davidson Service 267120 595961 1400.6215 321.28 H Davidson Service 267121 595966 1400.6215 358.21 349784 712812011 129360 STANLEY CONVERGENT SECURITY SO 204.68 Security System Monitoring 00001474 267122 8415458 1552.6103 204.68 349785 7/28/2011 101015 STRETCHERS 32.04 SUPPLIES 00003073 267337 1850798 1400.6406 32.04 349786 7/2812011 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 344.06 Silverado Repair 00005288 267310- 594045 1553.6180 21.44 Bezel Credit 00005282 267311 CM30331 1553.6530 18.97 Bezel 00005215 267312 330358 1553.6530 21.44 Bezel 00005282 267314 330331 1553.6530 363.03 349787 712812011 121161 SUPER MEDIA LLC 42.26 267124 380007460384 5821.6188 42.27 267124 380007460384 5841.6188 42.27 267124 380007460384 5861.6188 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Page - 25 Business Unit PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY 126.80 349788 7/28/2011 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 710.00 267192 Z00385 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 960.00 267193 Z00387 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 995.00 267377 Z00384 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 349789 7/28/2011 122511 SWANK MOTION PICTURES INC. 1,035.00 7/147/28 Movies in the Park 267125 DB1586729 5631.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 1,035.00 349790 712812011 104932 TAYLOR MADE 404.96 GOLF CLUBS 267445 16269740 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 123.58 MERCHANDISE 267446 16281737 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Council Check Register Page - 26 7/28/2011 -7/28/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 548.98 MERCHANDISE 267447 16275236 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 275.67 MERCHANDISE 267448 16277749 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,161.78 MERCHANDISE 267449 16207144 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,514.97 349791 712812011 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 703.60 Beer 00006345 267316 647795 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 101.25 267378 648399 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 6,536.55 267379 648398 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 252.00 267450 00770444 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 7,593.40 349792 712812011 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 231.25 Draft 715111 Minutes 267126 M18508 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 231.25 349793 7/2812011 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 875.31 Tooth 00005289 267317 9C00719 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 58.00 Hinges 00005116 267318 9C00542 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 933.31 349794 712812011 122109 TOSHIBA BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 6.93 Toshiba Copier 267127 8424.717 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 6.93 349795 712812011 101693 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS 14.25 Monthly FTP File 267128 26760 5820.6160 DATA PROCESSING 50TH STREET GENERAL 14.25 Monthly FTP File 267128 26760 5840.6160 DATA PROCESSING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 14.25 Monthly FTP File 267128 26760 5860.6160 DATA PROCESSING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 42.75 349796 7/2812011 129386 TRAFFIC LOGIX INC. 4,319.00 SPEED HUMPS 00001432 267471 1 -13280 01383.1705.31 MATERIALS/SUPPLIES BA -383 W44TH ST 4,319.00 349797 712812011 116535 TRAVELERS 1,266.00 Insurance Deductible 267129 000383887 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,266.00 349798 712812011 100682 TRUGREEN - MTKA 5640 208.42 CONTRACT INSECT CONTROL 00001533 267338 046606 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 208.42 R55CKREG LOG20000 712812011 128680 VIDACARE CORPORATION CITY OF EDINA 501.61 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003600 Council Check Register 14068 1470.6510 501.61 7/2812011 -7/28/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 349799 7/2812011 267194 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE CO. 140.83 267380 370.74 DOOR PARTS 00001418 267339 464984 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS 267381 0042199 370.74 1,421.28 349800 712812011 349805 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 511.39 Paper Supplies 00007512 267320 204422 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 71.79 Bags, Soap, Forks 267321 204426 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 579.69 307.51 Bags, Soap, Forks 267321 204426 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 127990 WESTWOOD HILLS NATURE CENTER 396.85 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00001519 267340 204525-00 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 267131 1,287.54 349801 7128/2011 106308 VEITH, MICHELLE 600.00 ARLE Fall 2011 Catalog Design 267130 2011 -2 1629.6575 PRINTING 600.00 349802 712812011 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 32.72 267451 2599750086 5952.6188 TELEPHONE 37.24 267451 2599750086 1640.6188 TELEPHONE 67.37 267451 2599750086 1495.6188 TELEPHONE 77.76 267451 2599750086 1120.6188 TELEPHONE 138.71 267451 2599750086 1600.6188 TELEPHONE 286.68 267451 2599750086 1470.6188 TELEPHONE 349803 712812011 128680 VIDACARE CORPORATION 501.61 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003600 267341 14068 1470.6510 501.61 349804 7128/2011 119454 VINOCOPIA 1,258.00 267194 0042187 5862.5513 140.83 267380 0042198 5842.5512 22.45 267381 0042199 5842.5515 1,421.28 349805 712812011 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 55.00 Concessions, Cleaning 267322 31387340 5311.6511 524.69 Concessions, Cleaning 267322 31387340 5320.5510 579.69 349806 7126/2011 127990 WESTWOOD HILLS NATURE CENTER 225.00 Travelin Teens Trip 267131 1624.6406 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 7/2712011 7:49:43 Page - 27 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE YORK SELLING 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 50TH ST SELLING BUILDING MAINTENANCE ADAPTIVE RECREATION RECYCLING PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL INSPECTIONS ADMINISTRATION PARK ADMIN. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING CLEANING SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION POOL CONCESSIONS PLAYGROUND & THEATER R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/28/2011 - 7/28/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Page - 28 Business Unit 1490.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC HEALTH 5662.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 225.00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 349807 712812011 YORK SELLING 101973 WILMOT, SOLVEI COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 157.59 Mileage Reimbursement - June 267132 VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 157.59 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 349808 712812011 YORK SELLING 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 236.20 5842.5513 267195 27503400 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 318.30 5421.5514 267196 27488000 982.15 267382 274886 -00 1,536.65 349809 7/28/2011 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 275.02 267197 369517 1,326.19 267383 370323 129.12 267384 370321 1,730.33 349810 712812011 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 2,303.89 267198 603142 1,365.45 267199 603143 34.53 267200 603146 6,013.77 267201 603144 22.04 267202 835893 4,020.64 267203 603141 495.49 267204 601654 80.77- 267205 835892 196.85 267206 603145 359.85 267207 601655 4,808.58 267385 603147 650.87 267386 604819 6,803.22 267387 603140 14.00 267452 778185 26,964.33 349811 712812011 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 7,817.59 267208 775043 52.30 267209 775044 3,038.50 267388 774496 10,908.39 349812 712812011 118395 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Page - 28 Business Unit 1490.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC HEALTH 5662.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Council Check Register Page - 29 7/28/2011 — 7/28/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No 306.69 FIREFIGHTING GLOVES 00003555 267342 E838955 306.69 349813 712812011 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 46.60. W 70th St Eng 10-3 267252 7- 01686 -180 310.67 W 70th St Eng 10 -3 267252 7 -01686 -180 621.34 W 70th St Eng 10 -3 267252 7 -01686 -180 761.14 W 70th St Eng 10 -3 267252 7- 01686 -180 1,522.28 W 70th St Eng 10-3 267252 7- 01686 -180 12,271.47 W 70th St Eng 10-3 267252 7- 01686 -180 188.33 W 44th 267253 9 -01686 -170 231.56 W 44th 267253 9- 01686 -170 926.22 W 44th 267253 9 -01686 -170 2,050.03 W 44th 267253 9 -01686 -170 4,322.36 W 44th 267253 9- 01686 -170 70.00 W 70th St 267254 8 -01686 -180 466.65 W 70th St 267254 8 -01686 -180 933.30 W 70th St 267254 8 -01686 -180 1,143.29 W 70th St 267254 8 -01686 -180 2,286.59 W 70th St 267254 8 -01686 -180 18,432.67 W 70th St 267254 8-01686 -180 523.45 W 44th St Eng 11 -7 267255 8 -01686 -170 643.59 W 44th St Eng 11 -7 267255 8 -01686 -170 2,574.36 W 44th St Eng 11 -7 267255 8 -01686 -170 5,697.92 W 44th St Eng 11 -7 267255 8-01686 -170 12,013.68 W 44th St Eng 11 -7 267255 8-01686 -170 68,037.50 349814 7/28/2011 101726 XCEL ENERGY 31,164.44 51- 5605640 -1 267453 288685257 31,164.44 349815 712812011 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 183.50 267210 10395 183.50 349816 7/28/2011 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 234.36 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 00008088 267454 54067526 234.36 349817 7/28/2011 102960 ZUHRAH SHRINE FLAMES 75.00 CL PERFORMANCE 8/3/11 267392 072511 Account No Subledger Account Description 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 03457.1705.21 05503.1705.21 06043.1705.21 06044.1705.21 04369.1705.21 08057.1705.21 06045.1705.21 03466.1705.21 04381.1705.21 05516.1705.21 01383.1705.21 03457.1705.21 05503.1705.21 06043.1705.21 06044.1705.21 04369.1705.21 01367.1705.21 06045.1705.21 03466.1705.21 04381.1705.21 05516.1705.21 01383.1705.21 5911.6185 5862.5513 5510.6610 5631.6136 CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION LIGHT & POWER Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SS-457 W70TH TS IMPLEMENTATION WM -503 W70TH ST TRAFFIC STUDY TS -43 W 70TH ST RECON TS-44 W 70TH ST RECON STS -369 W 70TH STREET L -57 W 70TH ST RECON TS-45 W 44TH ST RECON SS-466 W 44TH ST RECON INTERLACHEN BLVD SIDEWALK W 44TH ST RECON BA -383 W44TH ST SS-457 W70TH TS IMPLEMENTATION WM -503 W70TH ST TRAFFIC STUDY TS -43 W 70TH ST RECON TS-44 W 70TH ST RECON STS -369 W 70TH STREET BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT TS-45 W 44TH ST RECON SS-466 W 44TH ST RECON INTERLACHEN BLVD SIDEWALK W 44TH ST RECON BA -383 W44TH ST WELL PUMPS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING SAFETY EQUIPMENT ARENA ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 75.00 2,080,980.75 Grand Total CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 7/2812011 —7/28/2011 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 2,080,980.75 Total Payments 2,080,980.75 Business Unit 7/27/2011 7:49:43 Page - 30 R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 7128/2011 - 7/28/2011 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 136,916.91 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 9,684.57 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 318,140.39 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 71,613.10 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 53,948.36 05100 ART CENTER FUND 889.57 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 156.55 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 22,204.56 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 16,675.56 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 3,406.78 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 10,062.18 05800 LIQUOR FUND 147,499.94 05900 UTILITY FUND 1,057,008.91 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 216,157.23 05950 RECYCLING FUND 32.72 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 13,511.51 09900 PAYROLL FUND 3,071.91 Report Totals 2,080,980.75 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing polic' s an procedures datea__ /_L,�-e /lf 7127/2011 7:50:25 Page - 1 w9l�,l� rn �y REPORURECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: IV.C. From: Jack Sullivan, PE Assistant City En sneer N Action F-1 Discussion 11 Information Date: August 3, 2011 Subject: Traffic Safety Committee Report of July 6, 2011. ACTION REQUESTED: Review and approve Traffic Safety Committee Report of July 6, 2011. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The Traffic Safety Committee report remained on the July 21, 2011 consent agenda, therefore the Transportation Commission recommended moving the report to Council for approval. ATTACHMENTS: Traffic Safety Staff Review Report for July 6, 2011 Draft Edina Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes of July 21, 2011 G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traftic Safety Committee \Staff Review Summaries \l l TSAC & Min \Item IV.C20110706TSC.doc Page 1 of 1 Edina Transportation Commission Item IV.B. REGULAR TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Transportation Commission Agenda Item No.: IV.B From: Jack Sullivan ACTION: Assistant City Engineer ❑ Recommendation /Motion Date: July 21, 2011 ® Discussion Subject: Traffic Safety Committee I ❑ Information Report of July 6, 2011 Infofflack4round: Attached is the Traffic Safety Committee Report for July 6, 2011. An overview of the comments supplied by the Transportation Commission will be included in the staff report provided to Council. G:\Engineering\Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Transportation Commissional gendas\ 2011R &R\20110721_Item.N.B_Traffic Safety Report.docx TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE REPORT Wednesday, July 6, 2011 The Committee review of traffic safety matters occurred on July 6, 2011. The Committee is comprised of staff members included the City Engineer, Assistant City Engineer, City Planner, Police Traffic Supervisor and Traffic Safety Coordinator. From that review, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were also informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the July 21, 2011, Edina Transportation Commission and then on to the August 3, 2011 Council Agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which the Committee recommends approval of request: 1. Request for a "Handicapped Child" sign for the 6000 block of Fairfax Avenue. This requestor has recently moved into a house on the 6000 block of Fairfax Avenue. He states that he has a mentally challenged child who is just now learning to walk. He is requesting that a Handicapped Child advisory sign be placed on both ends of this block. City policy states that all requests for Handicapped Child signs be granted. Staff has always recommended that this type of request be approved and has advised all requestors to notify the City when the signs are no longer needed. Staff contacts each resident every September to determine if the signs are still needed. Edina currently has ten handicap advisory signs in place throughout the City. Staff recommends the approval of the installation of "Handicap Child" suns at each end of the 6000 block of Fairfax Avenue. Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 1 of 4 July 6, 2011 SECTION B: Requests on which the Committee recommends denial of request: 1. Request for pedestrian crosswalks crossing Division Street at Vandervork Avenue and Rutledge Avenue. Also a request for stop signs for Division Street at Rutledge Avenue. This request comes from a resident on Parkside Lane who is concerned with the safety of pedestrians utilizing Todd Park. Division Street at Rutledge Avenue has a Mon. -Fri. average daily traffic count of 711 vehicles with an 85th- percentile speed of 33.6 mph. There have been no reported accidents at this intersection from 2001 -2010. Stop sign policy states that the total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all approaches must average at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours on an average day. Division Street at Rutledge Avenue falls far short of meeting warrants for an all -way stop Edina's crosswalk policy states that pedestrian crosswalks shall only be placed in an area that has in excess of 20 pedestrians crossing for a minimum of two hours during any eight -hour period. Division Street at Vandervork and Rutledge Avenues would not meet policy warrants. State Statute 169.21 states that all intersections are designated crosswalks whether marked or not and that the driver of a vehicle must stop and yield the right of way to a pedestrian. Staff recommends the denial of the reauest for pedestrian crosswalks on Division Street at Vandervork and Rutledge Avenues. Staff also recommends the denial of the request for an all -way stop at Division Street and Rutledge Avenue for lack of warrants. 2. Request for temporary stop signs to be laced on all streets that intersect with Dunberry Lane until the West 70 Street reconstruction project is completed. This request comes from a resident on Dunberry Lane who is frustrated with the additional traffic on his street caused by the West 70th Street reconstruction. Before and after traffic studies were conducted on Dunberry Lane on the requestors block. The before vehicle count was 217 vehicles with an 85t'- percentile speed of 28.8 mph. The study conducted after the project began Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 2 of 4 July 6, 2011 showed 807 vehicles with a speed of 28.9 mph. The detour resulted in placing an additional 590 cars on Dunberry Lane but the speeds of these vehicles remained the same. The West 70th Street reconstruction project, along with its detour, has generated many complaints from residents living directly to the north of 70th Street. This project will be completed later this summer and driving patterns should return to normal. Adding stop signs at each intersection that crosses Dunberry Lane would only make things worse. Staff recommends the denial of the request to place temporary stop signs at all intersections that cross Dunberry Lane for lack of warrants. 3. Request to change the "Yield" signs on Kellogg Avenue at West 61" Street to "Stop" signs. This request comes from a resident on Kellogg Avenue who states that cars are not yielding at this intersection. Kellogg Avenue is a local street with a Mon. -Fri. average daily traffic count of 437 vehicles and an 85th- percentile speed of 27.0 mph. West 61s' Street has an average traffic count of 2061 with an 85th- percentile speed of 35.3 mph. There have been no reported accidents at this intersection from 2001 -2010. Warrants are not met for a stop sign at this location. Staff recommends the denial of the request to change the current "Yield" signs to "Stop' signs at Kellogg Avenue and West 61st Street for lack of warrants. SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others. 1. Request to restrict parking on the south side of West 42nd Street between Grimes Avenue and Alden Avenue, across from the Golden Years Montessori School, with signs that read, "NO PARKING /STANDING /WAITING /STOPPING — Mon. -Fri., 8:00 am to 4:00 pm." A letter is being sent to those residents who would be affected by this parking restriction seeking their input. 2. The following three requests were made from a resident on the 5500 Block of Xerxes Avenue: 1) Request for a pedestrian crosswalk crossing Xerxes Avenue at 55th Street; 2) Request for a stop sign for north/south Xerxes Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 3 of 4 July 6, 2011 Avenue traffic at 54h Street making this an all -way stop intersection; 3) Request for bicycle lanes on each side of Xerxes Avenue running the entire length of Xerxes. Requestor was referred to Hennepin County and the City of Minneapolis. In the past, both Hennepin County and Minneapolis have denied any additional crosswalks or signage on Xerxes Avenue. 3. Request for No Parking signs for both sides of the street on the 6200 block of Hillside Road. Requestor states people attending events at Countryside Park are parking on Hillside Road and not utilizing the on -site parking lot. A petition was sent to requestor who will circulate among neighbors and determine if signs are wanted and the exact wording for the signs. 4. Request for a pedestrian crosswalk crossing West 42nd Street at Alden Avenue. This area is scheduled for a study this fall to determine if a sidewalk will be installed along W. 42nd Street from France Ave to the western city limits. A crosswalk will be considered at that time. SECTION D: Other traffic safety issues handled. 1. Call from a resident wondering when the sidewalk was going to be installed on Interlachen Boulevard & Bedford Avenue. This has already been approved and should be installed shortly. 2. Call from a real estate agent wanting to know the traffic count on Dewey Hill Road south of Valley View Road. Reported traffic data on file. 3. A complaint from a resident on West 45`h Street complaining that her house was shaking from the construction equipment on West 44`h Street. Referred her to the on -sight project manager. 4. Call from a resident wondering about parking and traffic congestion in the Jerry's parking lot for the new Walgreens store. Advised. 5. Call from a resident on Jefferson Avenue complaining that a City tree was hanging over his fence. Referred him to the City Forester. 6. Request for a pedestrian crosswalk crossing York Avenue at Hazelton Road. Referred to Hennepin County. Traffic Safety Committee Report Page 4 of 4 July 6, 2011 MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COUNCIL CHAMBERS JULY 21, 2011 6:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bass, Bonneville, Braden, Frazen, Janovy, McKleven, Nelson, Scheerer, Thompson and Schold Davis APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by Member Franzen and seconded by Member Braden approving the meeting agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. F ON OF CONSENT AGENDA Motion was made by Member Braden and seconded by Member Franzen approving ent agenda with the exception of Item W.A., approval of minutes, regular meeting of June 16, 2011. All voted tion carried. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 16.2011 The minutes were amended as follow: Page 1, item III, strike "Chair Janovy moved for a change on" and replace with "Chair Janovy proposed to change..." Add "amended" to "Commissioner Franzen moved to approve the amended meeting agenda..." Page 2, item C., strike "did not do enough for biking" and replace with "did not meet intended goals of funding." Top of page 5 strike "France Avenue Study was done for Active Living in Hennepin County, but the study was not done by Hennepin County and does not necessarily have their support" and replace with "France Avenue Study was commissioned by the- City and_ Hennepin County's Housing, Community Works and Transit Department. It is not known whether it has the support of Hennepin County Transportation or Public Works Departments." Motion was made by Member Braden and seconded by Member Franzen to approve amended minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried. COMMUNITY COMMENT None. TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS FOR SENIORS Presentation by Elin Schold Davis Population age 65 and older will grow more than 2% annually from 2001 to 2009 and another 60% over the next 15 years; therefore, needing multi -modal solutions. As the ETC think about Complete Streets, they need to think about the abilities of residents in the community and transportation options including physical, vision, cognition and level of assistance. Living Streets is a great start that most communities are adopting; however, nationally, less than one -third addresses the needs of older users. Member Schold Davis said she would like Edina to address the needs of its diverse population. Continuing, she said the five A's of senior friendly transportation that realtors and others may begin using to score communities are: 1) Availability; 2) Acceptability; 3) Accessibility; 4) Adaptability; and 5) Affordability and she recommended that the ETC use these as measuring tools. HUMAN SERVICES TASK FORCE A request was made for a volunteer to serve on this task force to make recommendation how the City should spend its human services funds. Member Braden volunteered and Member Schold Davis volunteered to be her back -up. 1 COMMISSION DISCUSSION Format for forwarding recommendations to the Council Chair Janovy said at the last meeting two recommendations were made to the Council that have not yet been submitted because there is not a proper way to do so currently and she asked for suggestions. Members Braden and McKlveen each suggested a format. TLC Grant Update Assistant city engineer Sullivan said the BETF has a workshop scheduled for August 3 with the City Council and Manager Neal and this topic will be discussed. He anticipates drafting a formal response to the TLC following the meeting. Discussion ensued regarding the 3 -to -2 lane conversion on Valley View Road; Director Houle, consultant (WSB) and TLC working together to develop a plan for the 8/3 meeting; whether or not residents on Wooddale were surveyed; and building ramps parallel to crosstown to avoid the Valley View intersection. Motion was made by Member McKleven and seconded by Member Thompson to recommit their support of the project to secure the TLC grant and to endorse the 3 -to -2 lane conversion on Valley View Road. All voted aye. Motion carried. France Avenue corridor update /pedestrian bridge Assistant city engineer Sullivan said the ETC's recommendation to Council was to support significant enhancement of at grade crossing along France Avenue from crosstown to TH -494 and not. support the bridge.,He said staff is moving forward with the RFP to secure funding of the bridge. During discussion, it was noted that the cost of the bridge is approximately $3 -SM with $1.SM in federal grant and the rest would come from TIF funds. Staff was asked why they were continuing to support the bridge. Mr. Sullivan said when the application was done, there were strong support for the bridge, especially during the W. 70th Street (France to TH- 100) planning. He said at that time, current plans by Three Rivers District was not known but it does not mean that modifications cannot be made to align the bridge with their plan. Motion was made by Member Bonneville and seconded by Member Nelson that the ETC reiterate their prior recommendation that the bridge not be built for lack of info_ rmation and high cost; lack of public input; not knowing connectivity; will not serve users on France Avenue; lack of justification; not warranted for usage; and not judicious, efficient use of public dollars. Rollcall: Ayes: Bass, Bonneville, Braden, Nelson, Janovy, Schold, Davis Nays: Franzen, Thompson Motion carried. Temporary traffic control zones and Temporary speed table Assistant city engineer Sullivan said at the last Council meeting questions were raised regarding the meaning of "road closed to thru traffic" and "road closed' signs at the W. 44th and W. 70h Streets reconstruction projects. He said both streets are heavily used and are currently detoured for reconstruction. He said "road closed to thru traffic" sign means that if you are not a resident on that street or visiting a business, you should not be using that street; and "road closed" means there is activity going on that will prevent you from getting thru, even for residents on that street. Accessing north /south streets by crossing a closed street is not allowed. Mr. Sullivan said these areas are generally patrolled by the police. Temporary Installation of speed table was authorized by Council on Sunnyside Road, east of Townes Road, due to drivers not using the detour as directed and the goal is to readjust drivers' behavior. Currently, there is not policy in place for the use of speed table; one will need to be developed. Living Streets RFP update Staff is finalizing the RFP and members have recommended some firms to receive it. Bike Edina Task Force Update Chair Johnson has stepped down and the leadership is shared with co- chairs Peter Kelly and Brad Chappey. Discussion took place regarding the structure of the BETF and if it would like to remain independent, become a committee of the ETC, or be its own board or commission and this came up because the ETC bylaw does allow for a committee. Grandview Small Area Study Update Member Nelson said they have not been able to attend the meeting as the schedule is the same as the ETC; however a letter of interest were issued to select a consultant to assist in the process and they are reviewing those letters tonight. 44th and 70th Street Updates W. 44th was discussed earlier and is progressing; phase 1 of W. 701h Street was paved yesterday and the goal is to open this phase before school begins. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS None CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Member Nelson asked if there is a plan for reconstructing concrete streets. Mr. Sullivan said most of the concrete streets still have some time to before needing to be replaced and they are also much more expensive than asphalt. He said they are putting together a plan for concrete street replacement. Member Franzen said the presentation on transportation options for seniors was intriguing and warrant more discussion and perhaps subcommittee to do more research. Member Schold Davis said she would be happy to help with a.subcommittee. She said there are some counties that are starting the discussion that they could probably become involved with. Member Bonneville said they should look at the intersection at Interlachen Blvd where it crosses Vernon by the gas station because it is a difficult intersection. He said perhaps the ETC can lend some support to the small area planning group to look at it. Member Bass gave the.following update on the state's budget as provided by a TLC staff: commuter and passenger rail routes remained uncut; transit fares are expected to remain the same; metro area transit service to remain intact; may be slight reduction in a few cities and suburban routes; federal contribution expected to be reduced; MetCouncil received $20M in state bonds to conduct'additional studies on new corridors; bicycle and pedestrian trails were included in a $500M bonding bill; Complete Streets legislation remain intact; and the budget for roads and transportation increased. Member Thompson said he received an email from Lynette that was sent by a resident on Pointe Dr. regarding the number of garbage trucks on his street and why the City did not have just one hauler. Chair Janovy said she referred him to the chair of the Energy and Environment Commission. STAFF COMMENTS None. ADJOURNMENT Motion was made Member Bass and seconded by Member Braden to adjourn. All voted aye. Motion carried. 3 41 0 Ce M ` Cn • r �p NroRPOPA� v- lase -5� REPORURECOMMENDAT'ION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV.D. From: John Wallin Finance Director ® Action ❑ Discussion El Information Date: August 3, 2011 Subject: Agreement With Waldorf Nevens Cleaners ACTION REQUESTED: Approve agreement between The City of Edina and Waldorf Nevens Cleaners INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: City staff have negotiated an agreement with Waldorf Nevens Cleaners for payment of delinquent utility bills which is attached. ATTACHMENT: Wadorf Nevens Agreement ? 1, AGREEMENT Agreement, made this 19 day of July, 2011, by and between Waldorf Development Services, LLP, a Minnesota limited liability partnership (hereinafter "Waldorf'), and the City of Edina, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota (hereinafter RECITALS 1. As of July 19, 2011, the property at 7075 Amundson Avenue in Edina, Hennepin ,. County Property ID No. 08- 116 -21 -11 -0009, (the "Subject Property") has $351,36.6.95 in delinquent or billed and unpaid City water bills, including amounts previously certified to taxes. 2. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 444.075, Subd 3e the City has certified $191,294.47, including interest and fees, in unpaid water charges to the County Auditor with taxes against the Subject Property for collection as other taxes are collected in 2009, 2010 and has adopted Resolution 2011 -54 authorizing the certification of an additional $117,364.52 in delinquent water bills in 2011. 3. Resolution No. 2011 -63 authorized City staff to initiate the termination of water service to the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The City will certify $117,364.52 in delinquent water bills to the County pursuant to Resolution 2011 -54. 2. Waldorf agrees to pay to the City Twenty Thousand and No /100 Dollars ($20,000.00) per month in payment toward the accrued and unpaid delinquent City water bills 158587A 1 it N. that have previously been certified to the County for payment with taxes or that will be certified to the County pursuant to Resolution 2011 -54. The first payment is due on or before August 1, 2011. . 3. Waldorf shall pay all billings for water used after July 31, 2011 within thirty (30) days of receipt of the billings. 4. If Waldorf fails to make the timely payments required under Paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Agreement, the City staff shall upon ten (10) days advance notice to Waldorf disconnect the Subject Property from the City's water service. WALDORF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLP By: Gener artner CI'T'Y OF EDINA By: -James Hovland, Mayor By: Scott Neal, City Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this a� day of 2011 by e n _Z1314) CS a General Partner of Waldorf . be�elopWent Services, LLP, a Minnesota limited liability partnership, on be 44f of said partnership. • JANE M. TIMM WTAWRKjc• sgTA 4Public dAy Comntlssion Expaes Jen 31,2016 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The forgoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day , 2011, by, James Hovland and, Scott Neal, respectively, the Mayor and City Manager. of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council. Notary Public - 158587v1 3 ofle Z`� V • REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. JV. E. From: John Keprios Director of Parks and Recreation Date: August 3, 2011 Subject: Contract No. PK 11 -3PK, 2011 Parking Lot Improvements Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: July 12, 2011 Se tember 11, 2011 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Midwest Asphalt Corporation $ 385,606.80 2. Bituminous Roadway, Inc. $ 394,970.15 3. Northwest Asphalt, Inc. $ 455,883.65 4. Omann Brothers Paving Inc. $ 466,429.30 5. Valley Paving, Inc. $ 480,594.87 6. Hardrives, Inc. $ 511,555.65 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Midwest Asphalt Corporation $ 316,147.25 11 GENERAL INFORMATION: 11 On July 12, 2011, bids were opened for the parking lot resurfacing of Braemar Golf Course, Garden Park, Countryside Park and Braemar Ice Arena. The bid package was structured in a manner that allows the City the right to accept or reject any number of the independent projects as well as reduce the scope of each individual project. The strategy was to bid them together to capture economies of scale. Midwest Asphalt Corporation submitted the following bid per project: Braemar Golf Course Parking Lot $ 69,459.55 Garden Park Parking Lot $103,895.00 Countryside Park Parking Lot $ 70,396.00 Breamar Ice Arena Parking Lot $141,856.25 GRAND TOTAL $385,606.80 The Braemar Golf Course Parking Lot is a 2011 CIP project budgeted at $100,000 and the low bid came in at $69,459.55. Due to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District restrictions we are unable to proceed with this project this year. The Garden Park Parking Lot is a 2011 CIP project budgeted at $250,000 and the low bid came in at $103,895.00. The Countryside Park Parking Lot is a 2011 CIP project budgeted at $60,000; however, the low bid came in at $10,396 over that estimated budget. Staff recommends we spend the additional dollars to complete Countryside Park Parking Lot because engineer estimates suggest that this is a very good competitive price. The engineer's estimate for this project is $84,293.50. The Braemar Ice Arena Parking Lot is a 2011 (CIP) project budgeted at $210,000 and the low bid came in at $141,856.00. Bid package specifications allow for adjusting the renovation which in this case will be,adjusted to comply with Nine Mile Creek Watershed District restrictions. The entire specified area will receive a one and one -half inch overlay of new asphalt that is compliant with Watershed District restrictions. Staff recommends award of bid to Midwest Asphalt Corporation for $316,147.25. If approved by Council. all aroiects must be substantially completed by September 16. 2011. John Keprios, Dire or of Park & Recreation The Recommended Bid is X within budget Edina Park and Recreation Department � MAYOR AND COUNCIL 1 k From: Cary Teague ® Action Planning Director lNLilll(�_\ Discussion Information Date: August 3, 2011 RE PO RT/RECO M M E N DATI O N To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. VI.A. From: Cary Teague ® Action Planning Director F-1 11 Discussion Information Date: August 3, 2011 Subject: Amended Site Plan and Preliminary & Final Plat, Waters Senior Convalescent Home Project at 6200 Colonial Way — Resolution No. 2011 -74 & Resolution 2011 -75. ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt the attached resolutions approving an Amended Site Plan and Preliminary and Final Plat per the recommendation of the Planning Commission INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The Waters Senior Living in Edina, on behalf of the Colonial Church of Edina is requesting an amendment to their approved site plan and a Preliminary and Final Plat for a 139 -unit, 3 -story senior convalescent home at 6200 Colonial Way. In an effort to create seven (7) affordable housing units within the approved development project, the applicant is requesting a reduction in the building size by 28 feet. Specifically 28 feet would be taken out of the middle of the building. The site plan remains generally the same, with the exception of one parking stall being eliminated. To accommodate the reduction in building size, 36 underground parking stalls would be eliminated. On the first floor, there would be a reduction in width of the two story entry, reductions in space for offices, a reduction in the cafe, living room and one of the wellness rooms. On the second floor there would be a reduction in private dining area, a reduction in the parlor, a reduction in air space for the two story entry and a shift in the dining area. On the third floor a gathering room would be eliminated. There would be no changes to the number or size of the dwelling units. The applicant is also requesting a subdivision of the property to create a new lot on which the building would be located. The Preliminary Plat was approved when the project was approved in 2010; however, Final Plat was not obtained, and the preliminary approval has expired. The proposed Preliminary Plat is exactly the same as the previously approved. Preliminary Plat. Planninq Commission Recommendation: On July 13, 2011, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Amended Site Plan subject to the findings and conditions set forth in the staff report dated July 13, 2011. (Vote: 7 -0) The Commission also recommended approval of the Preliminary and Final Plat subject to the findings and conditions set forth in the staff report dated July 13, 2011. (Vote: 6 -1.) ATTACHMENTS: • Resolutions 2011 -74 and 2011 -75 • Planning Commission Staff Report, July 13, 2011 • Draft minutes from the July 13, 2011 Edina Planning Commission meeting IAA, RESOLUTION NO. 2011-74 ESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMEDMENT TO THE SITE PLAN FOR THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING IN EDINA AT 6200 COLONIAL WAY BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: City of Edina Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 The Waters Senior Living in Edina, on behalf of the Colonial Church of Edina is requesting an amendment to their approved site -plan and:a Preliminary and Final Plat for a 139 -unit, 3 -story senior convalescent home at 6200 Colonial Way. 1.02 The purpose of the request is t&create seven (7) affordable housing units within the approved development project. The applicant is requesting a reduction in the, building size by 28 feet. The site plan remains generally.the.same, with the exception of one surface parking stall being eliminated. 1.03 To accommodate the reduction in building size, 36 underground parking stalls would be eliminated. On the first floor, there would be a reduction in width of the two story entry, reductions in space for offices, a reduction in the cafe, living room and one of the wellness , rooms. On the second floor there would be a reduction in private dining area, a reduction in the parlor, a reduction in air space for the two story entry and a shift in the dining area. On the third floor a gathering room would be eliminated. There would be no changes to the number or size of the dwelling units. 1.04 On July 13, 2011 the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Site Plan Amendment. Vote: 7 Ayes, 0 Nays. Section 2. FINDINGS Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed plans are consistent with the approved Site Plan for the development. 2. The building would be smaller in size. 3. The number of parking stalls provided would still exceed City Code requirements. 4. The applicant would provide seven units of affordable housing which will go towards meeting the City's established goal with the Met Council to provide additional, affordable housing units. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Site Plan Amendment for the Waters Senior Living in Edina at 6200 Colonial Way. City. Mall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 -826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 -826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2011-74 Page Two Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. Unless modified by the conditions below, the project must still meet the conditions required in the original Site Plan and Rezoning approval for the site. 2. The site must be developed in conformance with the following plans: • Site plan date stamped May 12, 2011 • Building elevations date stamped May 12, 2011 3. The project shall include seven units of affordable housing as determined by the Metropolitan Council. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on August 3, 2011. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 3, 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2011 City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2011-75 APPROVING A PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLAT FOR 6200 COLONIAL WAY City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 The Waters Senior Living in Edina, on behalf of the Colonial Church of Edina is requesting a Preliminary and Final Plat of 6200 Colonial Way to divide the existing parcel into two lots. 1.02 The following described tract of land is requested to be divided: Lot 1, Block 2, Colonial Church of Edina First Addition. 1.03 The owner of the described land desires to subdivide said tract in to the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "parcels ") described as follows: Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, Colonial Church of Edina Second Addition. 1.04 On July 13, 2011, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Preliminary Plat on a Vote of 6 -1. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The proposed plat meets all Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance requirements. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Preliminary Plat for the proposed subdivision of 6200 Colonial Way. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Final Plat must be filed within one year of City Council approval. 2. The Park Dedication fee of $695,000 shall be paid prior to release of the mylars approving the Final Plat. Adopted this 3rd day of August 2011. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -75 Page Two ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 6, 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2011. City Clerk Public Comment(s) No comments. Commissioner Carpenter moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion to close public comments carried. Discussion Commissioner Fischer commented the request was reasonable and was in favor of the variance as presented. Motion Commissioner Carpenter moved approval of the front yard setback variance for Connie Carrino and Jeffrey Miller at 4509 Garrison Lane with the recommendations of Staff. Commissioner Forrest seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. 7 -0. 2010.0001.11a Amendment to approved plan and Preliminary and Final Plat The Waters Senior Living of Edina 6200 Colonial Way, Edina Planner Aaker informed the Commission the Waters Senior Living in Edina, on behalf of the Colonial Church of Edina is requesting an amendment to their approved site plan and a Preliminary and Final Plat for a 139 -unit, 3 -story senior convalescent home at 6200 Colonial Way. In an effort to create seven (7) affordable housing units within the approved development project, the applicant is requesting a reduction in the building size by 28 feet. Specifically 28 feet would be taken out of the middle of the building. The site plan remains generally the same, with the exception of one parking stall being eliminated. To accommodate the reduction in building size, 36 underground parking stalls would be eliminated. On the first floor, there would be a reduction in width of the two story entry, reductions in space for offices, a reduction in the cafe, living room and one of the wellness rooms. On the second floor there would be a reduction in private dining area, a reduction in the parlor, a reduction in air space for the two story entry and a shift in the dining area. On the third floor a gathering room would be eliminated. There would be no changes to the number or size of the dwelling units. The applicant is also requesting a subdivision of the property to create a new lot on which the building will be located. The Preliminary Plat was approved when the project was approved in 2010; however, Final Plat was not obtained, and the preliminary Page 4 of 14 approval has expired. The proposed Preliminary Plat is exactly the same as the previously approved Preliminary Plat. Recommend that the City Council approve the site plan amendment to reduce the size of the approved 139 -unit convalescent home by 28 feet to provide seven units of affordable housing. Planner Aaker concluded that staff recommends site plan amendment approval based on the following findings: 1. The proposed plans are consistent with the approved Site Plan for the development. 2. The building would be smaller in size. 3. The number of parking stalls provided would still exceed City Code requirements. 4. The applicant would provide seven units of affordable housing which will go towards meeting the City's established goal with the Met Council to provide additional affordable housing units. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Unless modified by the conditions below, the project must still meet the conditions required in the original Site Plan and Rezoning approval for the site. 2. The site must be developed in conformance with the following plans: • Site plan date stamped May 12, 2011 • Building elevations date stamped May 12, 2011 3. The project shall include seven units of affordable housing as determined by the Metropolitan Council. Preliminary & Final Plat Recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary and Final Plat to create a new lot for the approved 139 -unit convalescent home. Approval is subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed plat meets all Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance requirements. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Plat must be filed within one year of City Council approval. 2. The Park Dedication fee of $695,000 shall be paid prior to release of the mylars approving the Final Plat. Page 5 of 14 Commissioner Carpenter questioned if the outdoor parking could be controlled to assure that recreational vehicles were not occupying these stalls. Planner Aaker felt this would not be a concern and would be managed closely by the property owners. Appearing for the Applicant Dave Jensen, The Waters Senior Living, thanked the Commission for their time this evening. He reviewed the requests before the Commission stating the affordable housing initiative was altered due to the fact TIF was not approved. The building size was reduced while still offering seven affordable housing units. Mr. Jensen explained his organization would not allow outdoor boat or recreational vehicle storage. Mr. Jensen stated his organization would need to receive two licenses from the State of Minnesota for the operation of the proposed assisted living units. He indicated his organization has three assisted living facilities currently in operation with proper licensing in place. He reviewed several letters of support with the Commission and supported Staffs recommendation for approval. Discussion Commissioner Carpenter questioned the timing of the licenses. Mr. Jensen indicated the licenses would be applied for in the construction process. The State would inspect the site to assure that the proper health and safety measures were in place. Commissioner Staunton requested further information on the anticipated population in the assisted living facility. Mr. Jensen described the anticipated residents further with the Commission along with their needs. Commissioner Staunton asked if any of the residents would have physical or mental disabilities. Mr. Jensen explained that 14 units were dedicated to memory care and would have 24 hour supervision. Commissioner Scherer commented on the parking concerns. She questioned if 126 stalls would meet the needs of the residents and employees. Mr. Jensen stated residents in care suites and memory units would not have vehicles. The remaining 96 units would have access to a parking stall. However, experience has shown that only 20% of these units would require a parking stall. He anticipated that 30 parking stalls would be needed for employees and 20 -30 would be needed for residents. Commissioner Fischer asked the average age of residents in the facility. Mr. Jensen stated the average age was estimated to be 87. Commissioner Forrest inquired how the facility would still offer affordable housing units when the building size was decreased. Mr. Jensen explained the common areas were decreased in size to accommodate for the proposed seven affordable housing units. Page 6 of 14 Commissioner Stefanik asked if the room sizes would be reduced through the new plan. Mr. Jensen noted the room sizes would remain the same. Chair Grabiel opened the public hearing. Public Comment(s Chair Grabiel read for the record a letter from a resident who strongly opposed the Waters Senior Living of Edina. Grabiel rejected the comments made in the letter as the comments were not truthful. Susan Clark, 5812 West 61St Street, opposed the proposed assisted living facility. Ms. Clark represented the adjacent neighborhood and reviewed the history of the project with dates. Ms. Clark felt the project was materially misclassified in the zoning process as other assisted living facilities were classified PSR4. She did not understand why Edina has classified the site PRD5. The State guidelines for assisted living facilities were reviewed. Ms. Clark then completed a calculation as to the number of residents that could occupy the facility. While Dave Jensen has stated no more than 169 residents will occupy the building, 209 residents would fit into the space. The adjacent neighborhood was not in favor of the increased density. Continuing, Ms. Clark noted 20% of the occupants of The Water Senior Living of Edina could be under the age of 55. She explained that this 20% would increase the parking needs of the facility. Concluding, Ms. Clark respectfully requested the Commission deny the amendment to the approved plan along with the preliminary and final plat for The Waters Senior Living of Edina. Robert Scroggins, 6256 Sandpiper Court, supported the proposal. He felt the proposed development was better and single family housing. Mr. Scroggins added that the plan was previously approved by the Council and the amendments only improved the facility, reduced the intensity and density while still offering affordable housing units. He indicated the request was reasonable and should be approved. Gordon Johnson, 5837 Jeff Place, reviewed the legal issues before the City. He understood the plan was previously approved and felt this was acted on erroneously by the Council. Johnson indicated the facility was not a convalescent home, rest home or nursing home and was not being properly licensed with the State. Continuing, Johnson commented that in his opinion the PRD5 zoning classification was incorrect under State statute, and the PSR4 zoning classification did not meet the proposed project either. He requested the City of Edina allow the applicant to withdraw their request or that the item be tabled to allow the City to adopt an assisted living Ordinance to permit the proposed use. Johnson felt once the proper Ordinance was in place the development could be properly reviewed. Kent Gravelle, 5609 Tracy Avenue, reviewed City Ordinance 810.11, explaining how the Commission was to review plats. Mr. Gravelle reviewed the history of plat approvals in the City. He indicated the neighborhood had no similar structures or facilities in close Page 7 of 14 proximity and did not fit with the character of the neighborhood. Mr. Gravelle expressed concern with increased traffic levels along Tracy Avenue. He explained the proposed development had a grade over 18% and significant slope changes would be made through the development. For these reasons, Mr. Gravelle requested the Commission deny the request. Jan Johnson, 5837 Jeff Place, noted she was a consulting dietician with assisted living facilities and has been for the past 40 years. She expressed concern about the reduced parking spaces and the zoning classification for this proposal. Ms. Johnson felt that more than 30 spaces were needed for employees. In addition, volunteer, visitor and guest parking spaces would be needed at the facility. She explained that overflow parking from this development would spill out into her neighborhood, which was not welcomed. Ms. Johnson requested the parking requirements be reviewed to assure that overflow parking was not brought into the neighborhood. Jeannie St. Pierre, 6005 Arbor Lane, indicated the City currently had a parking problem with scheduled park events at Colonial Way. St. Pierre then reviewed several photographs with the Commission of illegal parking and parking concerns on adjacent roadways to The Waters Senior Living as the result of park events, church events, weddings and funerals. Trevor Isaaman, 5704 Olinger Boulevard, stated he has lived in the community for 22 years. He explained the parking and traffic in his neighborhood has become a concern. Mr. Isaaman felt the reduction in parking was a mistake that the adjacent neighborhood would pay for. Chair Grabiel encouraged the residents in this neighborhood to bring their parking concerns to the Police Department and request additional enforcement. Dorothy Kerzner, 5828 Jeff Place, expressed concern regarding the proposed affordable housing. She reviewed a letter explaining the requirements for elderly waivers noting residents would have to qualify for medical assistance. Ms. Kerzner indicated elderly waivers were not a realistic solution to meet the affordable housing needs. David Henry, 5712 Creek Valley Road, objected to the density of the proposed project, along with the traffic study. He felt the trips in and out of the facility were misrepresented. Mr. Henry requested the Commission not approve the subdivision. Harvey Havir, 6108 Tracy Avenue, felt the project was being presented falsely as the assisted living facility did not meet the zoning needs of a PRD5. Chair Grabiel read through the City's zoning guidelines for PRD5 with the residents present. Page 8 of 14 Mr. Havir questioned if the State licensing required for the project would be affected by the current moratorium. Chair Grabiel indicated the license would be applied for half way through the construction project and the City's approval would be made based on City Code and not the State's licensure process. Christine Henninger, 5816 Jeff Place, clarified that the PRD5 zoning classification was for rest homes, convalescent homes or nursing homes licensed through the State of Minnesota. She indicated the- State currently had a moratorium on licensing for new rest homes, convalescent homes or nursing homes. Chair Grabiel indicated this would be addressed by Mr. Jensen. He clarified with the residents that if the Commission were to vote against the proposed plan this evening, The Waters Senior Living of Edina would proceed as previously approved. Mr. Jensen commented there was a moratorium on new nursing home facilities without specific approval from the Department of Health. He indicated his organization has received approval for a new facility in the cities of Minneapolis and Little Falls in the past year. Approval would be granted for a project in Princeton as well. Chair Grabiel questioned the difference between the proposed development and those that have a moratorium. Mr. Jensen explained the licensing for nursing homes had a moratorium while assisted living and memory care units were allowed. This was determined under Minnesota State Statute 144D, in addition to Minnesota Rule 9505.0290. Mr. Johnson commented assisted living facilities receive permits in the State of Minnesota and do not require a license in the same manner as nursing homes. He indicated if the proposed project were an assisted living facility and not a convalescent home the project did not fit City Code. Commissioner Staunton explained a PRD5 allows for a convalescent home, nursing home or rest home. He stated City Ordinance defined a convalescent home as a building or group of buildings licensed by the Minnesota Department of Public Welfare for the care of children, the aged, or infirmed. This goes on to say, or a place of rest and care for those suffering physical or mental disorders. City Attorney Knutson indicated that the City has already approved a PRD5 zoning classification for this property. The property is zoned PRD5 and in addition, a preliminary plat has already been approved. Knutson stated that the proposed use has been deemed appropriate by the City Council. Commissioner Fischer questioned Mr. Johnson when the Sunrise development was approved. He indicated this was a similar development with assisted living in a residential neighborhood and was approved by Mr. Johnson when he served on the Planning Commission. Mr. Johnson was uncertain of the year this was approved. He Page 9of14 commented the City should clarify its code regarding assist living facilities before proceeding with the proposed development. John St. Pierre, 6005 Arbor Lane, explained he had a card iac'procedure last week and requested that Jeff Duncan read his comment for the record. Jeff Duncan, 5820 Jeff Place, addressed the flood concerns of the property in question. He commented the developer has not taken into consideration the parking stalls that will be lost in the floodplain. Mr. Duncan stated the 100 year flood risk on this site should be considered. He noted the public's safety would be a concern if the parking lot had 12+ inches of standing water. Julie Appel, 5820 Jeff Place, addressed safety concerns in the neighborhood. She stated Jeff Place was a quiet street with very little traffic. Ms. Appel did not want to see the proposed development impact her street or her children's safety. While she supported senior citizens she understood that their driving habits and response times could become compromised at times. She did not want to see overflow parking from the assisted living facility spilling onto her street. Ms. Appel encouraged the Commission to keep her neighborhood streets safe and free of overflow parking. Ms. Kerzner reviewed the differences between the licensing processes for nursing homes and assisted living facilities. She requested the Commission consider another model for the proposed assisted living, such as Rose Cottage and deny the current request. Mr. Duncan questioned how the parking issues would be addressed after the fact. He indicated there was no room for a ramp or additional lot. All of the overflow parking would spill into the Countryside neighborhood. Property values would be affected in the long run. He requested the Commission vote no to the amended plan and no for the plat. Barbara Hoganson, 5829 Jeff Place, indicated the residents were thankful to be heard this evening and hoped the Commission would work with the residents and clarify how the PRD5 fit the proposed use. She noted the parking regulations did not take into account the real needs of the development. Ms. Hoganson spoke with Staff regarding the issue and felt the site should have been zoned PSR4, like all other assisted living facilities in the community. Chair Grabiel asked why the subdivision plat was allowed to lapse. Mr. Jensen stated the size of the building was being altered and the process was delayed more than expected. Chair Grabiel questioned how the development would limit the number of residents to 167. Mr. Jensen indicated care suites and memory units would never have more than one person. He stated based on his experience no more than one person lives in a Page 10 of 14 single bedroom. Mr. Jensen noted he did not foresee more than two people living in a two bedroom unit. Chair Grabiel inquired the number of employees that would work on a single shift. Mr. Jensen estimated the peak number of employees to be 30. Chair Grabiel questioned the number of handi -cap parking stalls on the site. Mr. Jensen stated this was regulated by State Code and two or three handi -cap stalls would be available both outside the building and within the parking garage. Chair Grabiel asked the difference between affordable housing units and low income housing units. Mr. Jensen explained the affordable housing units required elderly waivers. . Chair Grabiel requested further comment on the potential flooding of the parking lot. Mr. Jensen stated the parking lot would have signage. During a 100 year flood event, all staff would be bused to the site from the Eden Prairie facility. Chair Grabiel questioned how the City could guarantee that the facility would continue to operate as an assisted living facility. Mr. Jensen noted all zoning requirements would have to be met by The Waters Senior Living and he encouraged the residents to visit the Eden Prairie assisted living facility. Chair Grabiel asked how parking concerns would be addressed during weddings or funerals at the church. Mr. Jensen stated The Waters Senior Living has partnered with the church and he would be coordinating with the church for large events to assure there was no overlap. Ms. Hoganson indicated the City had no legal standing to assure that the assisted living facility would maintain its PRD5 function. She stated the PSR4 zoning classification would assure that the site would have to meet senior needs. Mr. Jensen explained the financing for The Waters Senior Living required seniors to be housed in the facility. The loan was a 40 year loan and could not be prepaid for 10 years. His intention was to have seniors in the development for the long term. Commissioner Scherer moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion to close public comments carried. Discussion Chair Grabiel questioned if the Commission had the scope of the authority to approve the subdivision request. In addition, he asked if the request met the terms for City approval. City Attorney Knutson noted that the City Council has already approved the preliminary plat and at that time the Council determined the request met all City Page 11 of 14 requirements. Knutson further explained that approval of preliminary and final plats was a quasi - judicial function of the Council and Planning Commission. The Commission was to determine the objective requirements of the Ordinance. Chair Grabiel asked if the proposed development met the City's requirements. Planner Aaker stated the project met City requirements. Commissioner Forrest noted she was in favor of the reduced sized building for this project. She was concerned with the definition of a nursing home and felt the proposed development was an assisted living facility. The City's Ordinance was worded more loosely and as trends in senior healthcare have evolved, the Ordinance should have been amended. Continuing, Commissioner Forrest did not feel the property should be zoned PRD5 for several reasons. Nursing homes and assisted livings required differing licenses and permits from the State. She indicated the parking calculations were made based on nursing home standards and not assisted living functions. Commissioner Forrest read City Ordinance 850.03, Section 2. She recommended the zoning be reviewed for this property and that the City review the PRD and PSR language. Commissioner Fischer commented the building size was a concern to residents when first presented, along with the price of the units. He stated the developer has reduced the size of the building and proposed seven units to be affordable. Fischer encouraged the neighboring residents to speak with the police department and traffic enforcers regarding parking concerns in their neighborhood and not blame the proposed development for the current concerns. Motion Commissioner Fischer recommended the City Council approve the amendment to the approved site plan to reduce the size of the approved 139 -unit convalescent home by 28 feet to provide seven units of affordable housing subject to Staff findings and recommendations. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. Discussion Commissioner Carpenter suggested the Commission consider an additional condition to address parking concerns. Commissioner Forrest agreed with this suggestion, stating she would enjoy seeing cooperation on this issue. All voted aye; motion carried. 7 -0. Commissioner Fischer recommended the City Council approve the Preliminary and Final Plat to create a new lot for the approved 139 -unit convalescent home subject to Staff findings and recommendations. Commissioner Carpenter seconded the motion. Page 12 of 14 Discussion Commissioner Forrest commented that because this was a preliminary plat approval, the evaluation of this project should consider the impact on the neighborhood and if the building fits the character of the neighborhood. Chair Grabiel noted that the action this evening was for both; preliminary and final plat. Motion carried. 6 -1 (Forrest). Chair Grabiel thanked the residents for their comments this evening and for participating in the Planning Commission's approval process. 2011.0005.09a Kirby Herman 5829 Brookview Avenue, Edina Subdivision with Variance This item has been continued to the August Planning Commission by request of the applicant. VII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS None. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS Chair Grabiel noted receipt of the Council Connection. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBERS COMMENTS: Chair Grabiel noted the Commission would be reviewing the Zoning Ordinance in the fall. He indicated an assisted living facility could be further addressed at that time. Page 13 of 14 IX. ADJOURNMENT: Commissioner Scherer moved adjournment at 9:45 pm. Commissioner Carpenter seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Respectfully submitted, }Ee&dvque*lthew TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial Services Page 14 of 14 w91N�11'� o e .by PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Originator Meeting Date Agenda # Cary Teague July 13, 2011 2010- 001.11a Director of Planning INFORMATION A BACKGROUND Project Description The Waters Senior Living in Edina, on behalf of the Colonial Church of Edina is requesting an amendment to their approved site plan and a Preliminary and Final Plat for a 139 -unit, 3 -story senior convalescent home at 6200 Colonial Way. (See project location on pages Al —A3.) In an effort to create seven (7) affordable housing units within the approved development project, the applicant is requesting a reduction in the building size by 28 feet. Specifically 28 feet . would be taken out of the middle of the building. The site plan remains generally the same, with the exception of one parking stall being eliminated. (See narrative and plans on pages A4 —A14.) To accommodate.-the reduction in building size, 36 underground parking stalls would be eliminated. On the first floor, there would be a reduction in width of the two story entry, reductions in space for offices, a reduction in the cafe, living room and. one of the wellness rooms. On the second floor there would be a reduction in private dining area, a reduction in the parlor, a reduction ,in air space for the two story entry and a shift in the dining area. On the third floor.a gathering room would be eliminated. There would be no changes_ to the number or size of the dwelling units. The applicant is also requesting a subdivision of the property to create a new lot on which .the building will be located. The Preliminary Plat was approved when the project was approved in 2010; however, Final Plat was not obtained, and the preliminary approval has expired. Ther proposed Preliminary Plat is exactly the same as the previously approved Preliminary Plat. (See proposed Plat on pages A13— A14.) SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Countryside Park; zoned R -1 Single- Dwelling Unit District and guided Public /Semi - Public. Easterly: Edina Fire Station; zoned R -1 Single- Dwelling Unit District and guided Low - Density Residential. Southerly: Crosstown Highway. Westerly: Nine -mile Village Townhomes; zoned and guided medium density housing. Existing Site Features . The subject property is 6.27 acres in size contains a parking lot for the Colonial Church with mature trees. (See pages A2 —A3.) Planning Guide Plan designation: High Density Residential Zoning: PRD -5, Planned Residential District Parking The revised plan would still provide enough parking for the project, based on City Code requirements for parking for a convalescent home. The required parking is one space for every four patients or residents based on the maximum capacity of the building, plus one space per employee on the major shift, plus one space per vehicle owned by the building's management. Based on 169 resident maximum, 30 employees, one vehicle and one bus, 74 spaces are required. The site plan shows that there would be 72 surface stalls and 54 enclosed stalls for a total of 126 stalls. Despite the loss of one surface stall and 36 underground parking stalls, the project would still far exceed the City's parking requirement. It has been staffs experience with similar type uses within the City of Edina such as Park Plaza and Vernon Terrace, that the underground parking areas are not fully used by the residents. Over time residents do not have the need for their cars and often times these stalls become storage areas for boats and cars for family members that do not reside in the building. The applicant has demonstrated that enough parking would be provided for both the existing Colonial Church and the senior convalescent home. For the church, the required parking spaces must be one -third the maximum seating capacity of the largest place of assembly. The maximum capacity of the sanctuary in the church is 857 people, based on a ratio of 22 inches per 0 person; therefore, 286 spaces are required. The site plan demonstrates 341 parking spaces available for the church. (See page A15.) The north lot contains 222 spaces, the west lot 20 spaces, and the east lot contains 99 spaces. The east lot was previously owned by Colonial Church, but dedicated to the City of Edina when the church was built back in 1978. Colonial Church and the City entered into a "Parking Lot Agreement" that allows the church to use the lot for their parking requirements. Site Circulation Site circulation would remain the same. Access to the site would be from two entrance /exits from Colonial Way. There would be surface parking in front of the building, with the loading area behind the building facing crosstown highway. A circular pick -up and drop -off area would be located in front of the building. Access to the underground garage would be from the front of the building on the west side. (See pages A8 and A8a.) The proposal would meet all minimum drive -aisle width standards. Preliminary & Final Plat The applicant is also requesting a re -plat of the lot to create a separate lot for the convalescent home. (See the plat on pages A13 —A14.) The subdivision would meet all minimum lot standards and subdivision requirements. Park Dedication Per Minnesota State Statute 462.353, Subd. 4(a) and Section 810.13 of the City Code, the applicant is required to dedicate land for public use as parks, playgrounds, recreation facilities, trails, or public open space, in an amount equal to the subdivision's proportional share of the City park system. Per Section 810.13. Subd. 5 of the City Code, the presumptive cash fee for subdivision of land is $5,000 per dwelling unit to satisfy the City's park dedication requirement. The City may also require a land dedication if - necessary. The total presumptive park dedication cost would be $695,000 with no land dedication. The fee would be required prior to the release of the final plat. Compliance Table With the exception of the parking stalls, the Compliance table is the same as with the.previous approval. City Standard (PRD -5) Proposed Building Setbacks Front — Colonial Way 43 feet 74 feet Side — West 48 feet 58 feet Side — East 35 feet 76 feet Front — Highway 62 35 feet 40 feet Parking Lot Setbacks Front 20 feet 20 feet Side — East 10 feet 50+ feet Side — West 10 feet 50+ feet Proximity to R -1 District 110 feet 344 feet Building Height No maximum requirement 43 feet Building Coverage 35% 33% Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 120% 90% Parking Stalls Church Spaces equal in number to one -third the maximum seating capacity of the largest place of assembly (Max. Capacity is 857 people = 286 spaces required) 341 spaces Senior Housing One space for every four patients or residents based on the maximum capacity of the building, plus one space per employee on the major shift, plus one space per vehicle owned by the building's management (169 residents, 30 employees, one vehicle, 72 surface stalls and 54 enclosed stalls one bus = 74 spaces required.) for a total of 126 stalls Parking Stall Size 8.5'x 18' 9' x 18' Drive Aisle Width 24 feet 24 feet Landscaping 54 over story trees and a full 117 over story trees would remain & complement of under story shrubs. 346 over story trees planted. 517 understory trees and shrubs would be planted. Of the over story trees, 33 would be planted in the Crosstown right -of -way and Countryside Park to provide additional screening. PRIMARY ISSUE & STAFF RECOMMENDATION Primary Issue • Is the proposed amendment to the Site Plan and Plat reasonable for this site? Yes. The proposed use is reasonable for three reasons: 1. The proposed plans are consistent with the approved Site Plan for this site. The building is simply reduced in size. The look/style of the building remains the same; the landscaping, site circulation, access, and number of units all stay the same. (See pages A7 Al2.) 2. The parking requirement would still be met. One surface parking stall would be lost and 36 underground stalls lost. However, as mentioned above, the number of parking stalls still exceeds the City Code requirement for Convalescent Homes. The required parking is one space for every four patients or residents based on the maximum capacity of the building, plus one space per employee on the major shift, plus one space per vehicle owned by the building's management. Based on 169 resident maximum, 30 employees, one vehicle and one bus, 74 spaces are required. The site plan shows that there would be 72 surface stalls and 54 enclosed stalls for a total of 126 stalls. Despite the loss of one surface stall and 36 underground parking stalls, the project would still far exceed the city's parking requirement. (See page A15.) 3. The revised site plan includes the provision of seven (7) affordable housing units. This would help the city to achieve its established goal with the Met Council of providing 212 additional affordable housing units by the year 2030. If the site plan were denied, the city would lose the affordable housing units and a large building would be constructed. Recommendation Site Plan Amendment Recommend that the City Council approve the site plan amendment to reduce the size of the approved 139 -unit convalescent home by 28 feet to provide seven units of affordable housing. Approval is subject to the following findings: The proposed plans are consistent with the approved Site Plan for the development. 5 2. The building would be smaller in size. 3. The number of parking stalls provided would still exceed City Code requirements. 4. The applicant would provide seven units of affordable housing which will go towards meeting the City's established goal with the Met Council to provide additional affordable housing units. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Unless modified by the conditions below, the project must still meet the conditions required in the original Site Plan and Rezoning approval for the site. 2. The site must be developed in conformance with the following plans: Site plan date stamped May 12, 2011 Building elevations date stamped May 12, 2011 3. The project shall include seven units of affordable housing as determined by the Metropolitan Council. Preliminary & Final Plat Recommend that the City Council approve the Preliminary and Final Plat to create a new lot for the approved 139 -unit convalescent home. Approval is subject to the following findings: The proposed plat meets all Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance requirements. Approval is subject to the following conditions: The Final Plat must be filed within one year of City Council approval. 2. The Park Dedication fee of $695,000 shall be paid prior to release of the mylars approving the Final Plat. Deadline for a city decision: September 6, 2011 n. .4.1 M-1 43 APhiCOT No 4-01-1 U6 THE WATERS SENIOR LIVING T H EWA T E R S OF EDINA SENIOR LIVING° Senior Housing Community on the campus of Colonial Church May 10, 2011 Cary Teague Planning Director City of Edina 4801 West 50`h Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Subject: The Waters Senior Living of Edina creation of some affordable housing Dear Cary, Since our initial submission, we have always worked to incorporate affordable housing into the Waters Senior Living of Edina. Creating affordable housing is an important mission to both Colonial Church and the Waters Senior Living. Affordable senior housing is needed in Edina. As you know there are over 10,000 Edina residents over the age of 65. The 2000 census estimated that 30% of these seniors, 3,000 Edina residents, would qualify for this affordable housing. The affordable housing would have rent and income limits will be set to meet the Met Council's affordable housing criteria. The affordable housing would also help Edina meet their Met Council affordable housing goal. Our proposal is to create seven affordable housing units (eligible to count toward the Met Council goal) through the reduction in development cost. The development cost reductions would be as follows: • Shorten the building by28 feet -taking 28 feet out of the middle of the building. • Eliminate the underground parking below the memory support wing Attached is a revised site plan along with front and back elevations showing the proposed modifications. As you can see, these modifications have a negligible impact on the look of the building while shrinking it by 28 feet. The building modification will eliminate 36 of the 90 underground parking spaces. Twelve of the 36 parking spaces to be eliminated are double spaces primarily used for car / boat storage. Of the 73 surface spaces, 3 would be lost. There would be 124 total parking spaces remaining. The zoning code requires 76 parking spaces. The parking requirement is exceeded by 63 %. We would also like the consideration of the Final Plat included with this item. Thank you for your consideration of our requests. Please call me at 952 - 358 -5110 with any questions. Sincerely, Jay Jensen Waters Senior Living A5 Water' Senior Living ®f Edina Revised affordable housing o portun ter Public Goal: To create affordable senor housing units Strategy. ThrouOrh a reduction in the development costs sufficient to reduce the annual debt service to make the affordable housing financially viable Affordable Housing: The rent and income limits will be set to meet the let Council's affordable housing criteria (50 % median Ineome). Therefore, with this building modification, Edina.wi]l be creating seven affordable housing units Development cost reductions (creates 7 affordable units) Eliminate parking spaces under the memory support (36 spaces and still exceed the parking requirement) o The building modification will eliminate 36 of the 90 underground. parking spaces. Twelve of the 36 parking spaces to be eliminated-are double spaces primarily used for car/ boat storage. Of the 73 surface spaces; 3 would be lost.. There would be 124 total parking spaces remaining. The zoning code requires 76 parking spaces. the parking requirement is exceeded by 63 %. Reduce the building length by 28 feet o Attached is a revised site plan along -with front and back elevations shotiving the proposed modifications. As you can see, these modifications have a negligible impact on the look of the building while shrinking it by 2 S feet. 1.-0 _] Anpmx.t � � ,� '.�o`^xq,u,^ --------- -- --------- -------------------------------- - - - - -- --------------- i F -------------- to j! Ln F ZnM3AV ADV-dl LU wLn If Isilai'll-H 010 C A ell ----------- Ln e a . T.2 - e_________ - — — - ---- - — j fie: ---- cwod - ------------------------=---------------- - - - - -- Ag F � |' zlQ,,a k .g m� 'm �� Q$ $ £.... A tfoo lo f 0 �� S 116 PLAN -� - • •� , 'fir• •'y '.'� � ! a�r.� ��; 1 •� �, t' 41, af., I -, wl"ll (111�11' -" Ito M Ab • ia� yrI► . I \, ' ' � ` ~ � , t jam• T I 1 ' ; „'i t �I ml.. h, ,, _. _ X11",'^ r.•,^' f ..+'+ �. .. 1r '9v' r ♦r '` iF�.�j , ;IT � `. .�. 11oa �fL-� v >,� �' .,t ' � �f�• '`ydfir� Y. � L�..� IVJA f. r ij. AL � "t " ' ` b "a r . t' r . � of • "� / 11�� '�yQ� 11 'r �r"1 .!�. i,r r • • � r � "+ � � � . t • �„ " + J` �. y'�'�l `,fir•,, r v,rt, 1 40 ►,�tr IL s` . jt: re _ � _ _ate _ _ iT:• tit r. . -.. . FRONT ELEVATION NORTH - - - - -- --------------------- ORIGINAL. DESIGN All PROPOSED DESIGN as B REAR ELEVATION SOUTH ORIGINAL DESIGN PROPOSED DESIGN OLINGER BLVD. SB857JV � _ — — 6J6.84 /I-------------------------------------------- I V V dll � f hh•�.�P The G1 a/ I � `r moth 11 � 1 A 1 m 1 1 � `._ $ �:J• COLONIAL MAY Preliminary Plat r AO; t Vaters Senior living of Hdina o1 r cC®L ®GQ AL CHURCH RCH ®P ®4G�1A SHCON® �1i ®®070®M O.MIS Npwld �� IiW IrMin Cae.vaN � � a��6M YbnalmY4 wl iixi! YIW[.321 -72 9lxU rr. (us>),ISe -xuu rw lull n> -oivl livl W NhN EMEEnNG PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: le:.l•`ma �a � u°°� s mw Iml uomi �.�1 r r.m.ar al PROPOSED PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Ii ut111�A � uw�ar v ®u mw wont �r s u...sr erpap ul. ww +load � — Ir,la tl w a Ir mm..a.aiue. 3 iq� N Nua�NC+.� I'•1 .. ieWf/�ri..Y �w Y.lnAna G11919 w 96iRR1Gi zr i—�a 1 aaII11A[ 0. ruwNV Ila. 0 eo Ixo SGIE I J K UNE KE 1/d. H.M. 1/e. SEL 5- _ BLVD._ 13 hl' S885YJI�- \- 6JGB4 1 ri62GV� 01.1,-------- - - - - -- N78-tag^'i NW ` OLO N EA L CHURCH - OF E ®M!!"\1 SECOND A®®MON AHDN ALL NIW BT W-SE P'M TIM TMI'IM C Tbl Ch1RJl vl E-. o MMUSIV nm -profit if Im IW-, Euvbed o1vPe11 .pulM N In. [enll N MYmeyN,SbY .1 Nbmeml4 b NL bl 1, Blink 1 C0.WNAL CNIMW OF TWA IYLSI AODIIIW - Ha.d W. 1. b. mrviId and N.IIeO m CRIlN1AL WU.W OF EDINA SECOND ADDITION and ..m n 1 m 1. 1. IM1. ib l d W P um Im.m 111. dr.Napi and u1211I .mananl. .. tllem m IM1b pI.L -' b .IN.m Nx...l ..N CYNd Ovm el Ebro. a tlMwb M m 11011 mdm W Yn N 11n SW. .1 Yi.vvlu, Im muad Om.. prmY1Y 1. A...0, . bl IY M 1/. CpL .lr IM. d.i .r mim - - 1.111.0. ]I E.im.. Ybmm.b e- S1 - ,�J y mp >.Ihm OF STATE OF NNNESOTA / - I cwxTr OF _ 1M ImNMV N.Imnml .m .ebmNm..d Mlme m bb � mI .I x010. br N Fdmtl ava .I Cml4. Ipm.ml. fist -pofil .mpwallm un.v Uw b.a .1 Yimeml4 m hUdl .1 b. CmgmF 6Wr11r .. ' � � 51157712' ' 44.88 � - ' 'NVIU) PlOf.. C.mIF YbmvuY - 0® YI CmmMYl1 1U.- SM* W FEET . . I hereby aUlx IMO IM1b plel .l COLONT& W W W OF mWA SEL ADDITION b P mr.el r ml.Ym .1 IM b- F IMO 0 mNmt- .l. m1 rU.l. s. -11, d- m Y1. PIlU MO N mdmbld m b Pbl Im. ham -m . b..111 ml NInN m- ..'t. m Yin Fbb W.1 m ..1. bmmdmbm and wl M1.N. m .1 ON, I. N m. -- W...11 -- m .M1e.n and b,bWW m lb. FbL• Ihit m Wbll .. N. m..n and kbY.d m W. pbL I MOm m W1 0m1 Ulb pYl ... p Ibl by m m ' un.m I dhal mpvN.bn W IMO 1 em . dWl ®... m. uvw)m mee IM b...1 W .1.1. N Yb.msln -1 N. -ck Uml.m Lind Sir II- Ybmvmb lLslYa NmWm ul.. - q -569 JJ i12- _ STATE OF MNEmTA' - - - - - -- Th. I.rry.N9 Y...lai. ..xIW.N .a. MnewbYgatl helm m. bb del - C� i0� 01 Y1N N. Oil- t .l Il&cK . IbvYW lvW Sp iI_ Ql�� h N.b1 PWOA NunyN Fr11F Yimmb - . pmp Nr Cmmb.br fapbm IV °o N •• EFT, YmIIEOTA - - . lkb pt.l N mLgdAl pNRW lY -A SEC TNT ADNlI1N ....Pm.... mq mg1N 61 IM [III Cams. el [Yl4 Yiew..la, sl a r.pdm -1.. N1va.1 Md Ibb _ m/ el � 2p- ' 229.76 - ' R.j67.6D _ n .mbmNa IM n111m .mnm.nl. m emlmund.lbv .1 IM Cmnmb t- el Trmmmldll.n m. IM IT HF Mq EMbem M1m b.m r IITb t by IM My m IM W. M .q MW bin .lm.N .nnml r¢.bl .! mU emmml. elW 1.emnmex..Jbi1 m pr.ddW by Yin 5I.1. SI.I.Im. Saellm S TT4 - I, - • Q.I8T6'16� NCI% 1� +1 6r F�t1 iv DTr Fdllxti a mwA IpxxrsprA _ BI Yep, uptm .. 1. Am SEN.= WATT.M.. -.. _.F .--t. 1 1 x1111 IMO lam P.pdd. N 20 and prim Emri nevi b.m pW la IeW dw.M m Um pq.L p.1.. Yd. mI .1 STATE A L Al wrml, T-y Aunt., DF pep.11 SYPNY YvmRL xmmgb -,A -1. Pm.m 1 1. Yi.u.sb SI.WI. S.e ].m .e (IpbB} pm PAIR b- aIF- u b mI N 2Q___ . lEOE1m '01W90F BFJViNl�i9.w. O Fm.Y mmummL lnAK N 4m.Y rwf xYn.l v.mF 1.�a. L _ 11®mn F. D_ NammN C11y Sr...N OF O 1/i; U bI 1. bux bin mmmml . I eW mmkvtl NIY YYm.mb ll.m.e Na 2]960. a xm.lBL - T11,T�'1yF �1Ep`' . ®w NamgN Com11 Ca.l bin YmenrmL COW11T 0EC010F/i. MYnWb CPPnIF 4M.mla Y0 tl du.i.lel lmdmml - - _ ptl� ' I Mnbl rnYII 1M1.1 IM NIM1N pl.l .1 CWLYAL f2pMW 01 mwA sTFwm AppI11ON vin nmldm,N NY NOSF InN .1 p� _ .'tl.sb gym. C:l NWed N CNWIL -1I v.emd. or. Oeprll - FELX INC. W�-L SHEET 1 OF 1 THE COLONIAL CHURCH OF EDINA I. �JI t 1 ^'' � . � E 7 EE, - ,, C � Jrin• 111 1II 1jI c.l.m.lummh uaa.n u.3olm 'd ..bra ®ptn.. )�IIII 6 °�= E� -�� m ® 4V// / 1 f ��eho e..l »oNdP •pw I� - M..CX TO' DRi1MNQS•. � '�;j I' d' ``` .� � •r � 3 �' � ± v� =`= Q � / H° II I i 'flquh.d Pahlno GleOC Oml] +]sn ba4 'I � gVIL.= I . �6a i11 tl 1 u tni IIa r41Mm iy'' � • •. .. � I 11 ' i l � w 7 L Yet . ,I . f l � PArmm Pwhhm 6mlc N11Ld= 311 b1.b 333 b1.nr t'.+ kLi Ina htammmalrrtj eun� • III Ltl 1 t ~ � I I� � n �°YI PeWp PmWN.i.161W 1, �� .'�1 -1 uitt�1�01N./tl — i �y r'FQ � m' •�i. � ` 1i1 Ir. %P I .. � -�. 7W gym' . Y°m mMO ulat ma . �.; o6ai.am 1 fa anusnn, W. It •1 ` na1,11° CIIUUCII �� I� •,� \Vl��r'Yf�,1f: N.� �wwICL I 1,. �.` �. {I � _, �- GY(NnY •. . . `• ttrW: � ' r c� m,u,noo.' s� 1: � ; . � � d - .sm.f.sti .. � �.' n.�"ioab'9n'1° . . � /����I •n4J .v i� �ty^ �: , � , t �� ®* '�� � I � . Ij - i.wnmurwmn.wlloa' a ' I e ' f �- � - -;�- IF ��. •� sesrlry eb w. ne vu'ur ' — ..�rtr[1llv+repl. Iwlmm ' �•1 .1 1 i ttA _.. �P.wr 411'1^ O �� �, � / / aii (IIiM! j , • . 1 ' � :rl'•, A � — S+, •r7'•� . ,�� .� � � � � � - .,;iJ TW a°li rlu wmmlm'm • nwf • .. � .. ... y�� ,,:s„ �'` •..• -:nom ,f ` ., :` , o •� � t �° /8 .' � . 'I�;;•��: {w °gym': • .\I /'° j , J•� ,' ^r MI '''',3!�'p� �\ ' .., _ a �'.. •�; ¢1 �.` .�:: f ` ` ` � .' ~� t ie �f �. - 1'EtE6Pdlcm..;.. A' Pbd m onoluler.,nden.�' —�y . •_ ' � ��`•` s�`'` � "SS «<II .u.l nmuwmmoton 1n ' II i Idn •rar1� ua7, fee dnlw�gjl��nll.� \\ :._ � �1 � ` ` ,`.�e (((((( r r � m1 mtina �9nun A t . •`. r ' ..r•`,` ' ,• ` r ye+— _ �' \�. + Roam uLmwn ti�rt em 1 .. I ; rr ' \ h•r. • 1 `.ti`: ` V, M— M.- v°u m I. In T 1 Id a �' `i•1;�, i _ `t� ' r / •0'� rymy •47L .)°ry � �ROSp i077ryJ r�� ti. .n .. .,F.EAT•P�•r1NL N:_ CP -1 PACKA E' i'.• FOR UMFORMAAITOOM 0 i1LY _ I Jackie Hoogenakker From: tedspringer @aol.com Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 201112:36 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: The Waters Dear Planning Commission: As proponents of the The Waters Development originally, we are now in favor of the changes which will permit the accommodation of affordable housing units there. Just as approving The Waters complex was the right thing to do, this change is the right thing to do. Edina can send a positive message by OKing the change. Sincerely, Nancy and Ted Springer 6300 Pheasant Ct. Edina, MN 55436 Jackie Hoogenakker From: Jim Beer <jbeer5804 @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 05, 20117:43 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Waters Senior Living I am writing to oppose making any changes to the Waters Senior Living building for the following reasons; 1. This project was sold to the public as one that would have under ground parking and not interfere with the city streets for parking , 2. We were told that residents would have plenty of parking for all vehicles underground and that it would not distract from the neighborhood. 3. We were told that the size of the building was imperative in order for the project to go forward and that anything smaller would not work. 4. There is a park, baseball fields and tennis courts next door that gets a lot of use and parking can sometimes be a premium, we don't need more of it on city streets 5. We were told a lot of things about this project and now the changes begin. This is a lousy location for a building this size and The Waters and Colonial Church are now finding out that they made a mistake and now the City of Edina and citizens of this community are going to pay the price for it. I think there is something else going on here, bait and switch to be exact. The Waters can't define what the building is going to be, senior living, assisted living, low income housing, etc. They got approval for what they described as a building that the neighborhood would be proud of now they want to start eliminating parking and other amenities. I think we deserve an honest answer as to why, they are not making it smaller out of the goodness of their heart. The Planning Commission should ask some hard questions of The Waters and Colonial Church and not approve any changes Jim and Liz Beer 5404 Jeff Place Edina, MN 55436 jbeer5804@gmail.com Jackie Hoogenakker From: Brian Barry <bpbarry6100 @gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, July 02, 20112:45 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: The Waters To whom it may concern, I remain of the position that the City of Edina, it's elected officials and the Colonial Church are guilty of greed and not representing the views, needs and wants of it's tax paying citizens. I remain 100% opposed to any support of this project and anything that has to to do with it UNLESS it is to stop the project, that I support 100 %. I fear for the safety of our children - my children and others in the countryside neighborhood that frequent the park. How long before someone is hit by a car because of the increased traffic this unneeded residency represents and will bring to an already busy intersection - not to mention the construction traffic. Nice job rezoning the land - when was that hearing /vote? Why don't you rezone something in your own neighborhood if you want it so bad. You all should be ashamed. Sincerely, Brian Barry 6100 Westrdige Blvd Edina, MN 55436 952 229 4645 1 o e \11) • l ,�CORPORP'T�� B88 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No.VIII.A. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk ® Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: August 3, 2011 Subject: Resolution No. 2011 -76 Accepting Various Donations ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2011 -76 RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -76 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Art Center: Bradley Benn USB Flash Drive Heather Randall Kings $100.00 William McCabe & $250.00 Debra Neuger Braemar Golf Course Memorial Fund: William Colby $25.00 Theodore Giannobile $15.00 Dated: August 3, 2011 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK Northmark Real Estate Services$ 2,500.00 Jerry's Foods $100.00 Cynthia & Joseph Fleury $100.00 John Valliere $25.00 Braemar Men's Club $50.00 James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for.the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 3, 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk A o4 Le t t4` IBBB REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VIII. B. From: Scott Neal City Manager ® Action ❑ Discussion El Information Date: August 3, 2011 �= o Subject: Public Facility Inventory and Feasibility Study Of An Indoor Athletic Facility ACTION REQUESTED: Motion to direct City staff to conduct a feasibility study of an indoor athletic facility under the guidance of the Park Board; direct staff to prepare an inventory of City of Edina's public facilities; authorize a project budget of $20,000; and authorize the Park Board to establish committees and subcommittees to assist with this task. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: At their July 19 Work Session, the City Council met with representatives of a group of residents who propose the construction of an indoor athletic facility, which has been commonly referred to as a "sportsdome ". The Council considered the proposal and agreed that it would be prudent to direct City staff to prepare a current inventory of public facilities owned and /or managed by the City of Edina, and to determine, through a feasibility study conducted under the guidance of the Park Board, if it is advisable for the City to support the construction of an indoor athletic facility. Upon the completion of its feasibility study, the Park Board will make a recommendation to the City Council concerning the advisability of supporting the construction of an indoor athletic facility. The final deliverable to the City Council from the Park Board on this matter shall include recommendations on the following subjects: ownership, capital finance, operational management and finance, program and location(s). The Council acknowledges the complexity of this assignment and agrees to allocate up to $20,000 for consulting costs associated with this motion and authorizes the Park Board to establish, at its discretion, committees and subcommittees the Board believes are necessary to accomplish this task. WA FMA REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: VIII.C. From: Jack Sullivan, PVgin " Assistant City E eer ® F] Action Discussion Information Date: August 3, 2011 Subject: Edina Transportation Commission Recommendation Livable Communities — Bike Boulevard Grant for Transit for ACTION REQUESTED: Below are two options regarding the Transit for Livable Communities — Bike Boulevard Grant. Staff recommends that City Council review both options prior to making a motion. 1. The Edina Transportation Commission carried a motion to recommit their support of the project to secure the TLC grand and to endorse the 3 to 2 lane conversion on Valley View Road. 2. Staff recommends that the Bike Boulevard Grant could move forward but will require a consultant to complete an engineering study of the Valley View Road section, prior to a 3 to 2 lane conversion could take place as well as Council approval to remove parking along Wooddale Avenue and 54th Street. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Approximately two years ago the City was granted $250,000 for a bike boulevard or bikeway from the Transit for Livable Communities (TLC). The project is for signing and striping a bikeway from the easterly border of Edina at West 54th Street, along West 54th Street to Wooddale Avenue, then south along Wooddale Avenue to Valley View Road, then east along Valley View Road to West 70th Street. Most of the route will be a "share the road" type signing and / or bike lane. The difficult area to transverse will be the Valley View Road / TH62 interchange area, which might need additional funding to complete. Steve Clark of the TLC has given presentations to the Bike Edina Task Force, Edina Transportation Commission and City Council and has now indicated that the TLC would require Valley View Road to be converted to a two lane road instead of the three lane road that exists today to receive the grant. Staff believes that due to the large volume of traffic, the number of intersections, and number of medium density homes along the corridor a thorough engineering study by a consultant is necessary prior to suggesting the reduction from three lanes to two. An engineering review of the roadway was completed prior to the reconstruction in 2004 and at that time the road was reduced from four to three lanes. Staff believes that the further reduction to two lanes may not be feasible since volumes have not changed in the 7 years. In addition, the intersection at Wooddale Avenue, 62nd Street and Highway 62 would most likely require a three lane section. This would then require the roadway to be widened a few feet to accommodate the suggested bike lanes in accordance with State Aid Standards. For these reasons staff submitted the original application to TLC recommending that Valley View Road remain a "Share the Road" facility. The estimated costs associated with that proposal did not anticipate the more costly reconstruction effects now suggested by TLC. ATTACHMENTS: Draft Edina Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes of July 21, 2011 Edina Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes of June 16, 2011 City Council Meeting Minutes of June 7, 2011 Resolution No. 2011 -70 Supporting Bike Boulevards Grant From TLC G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Trafflc \Transportation Commisslon \Agendas \2011 R&R to Council \Item VIII.C.ETCTLC.doc MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COUNCIL CHAMBERS JULY 21, 2011 6:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bass, Bonneville, Braden, Frazen, Janovy, McKleven, Nelson, Scheerer, Thompson and Schold Davis APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by Member Franzen and seconded by Member Braden approving the meeting agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Motion was made by Member Braden and seconded by Member Franzen approving the consent agenda with the exception of Item W.A., approval of minutes, regular meeting of June 16, 2011. All voted aye. Motion carried. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 16.2011 The minutes were amended as follow: Page 1, item III, strike "Chair Janovy moved for a change on" and replace with "Chair Janovy proposed to change..." Add "amended" to "Commissioner Franzen moved to approve the amended meeting agenda..." Page 2, item C., strike "did not do enough for biking" and replace with "did not meet intended goals of funding." Top of page 5 strike "France Avenue Study was done for Active Living in Hennepin County, but the study was not done by Hennepin County and does not necessarily have their support" and replace with "France Avenue Study was commissioned by the City and Hennepin County's Housing, Community Works and Transit Department. It is not known whether it has the support of Hennepin County Transportation or Public Works Departments." Motion was made by Member Braden and seconded by Member Franzen to approve amended minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried. COMMUNITY COMMENT None. TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS FOR SENIORS Presentation by Elin Schold Davis Population age 65 and older will grow more than 2% annually from 2001 to 2009 and another 60% over the next 15 years; therefore, needing multi- modal.solutions. As the ETC think about Complete Streets, they need to think about the abilities of residents in the community and transportation options including physical, vision, cognition and level of assistance. Living Streets is a great start that most communities are adopting; however, nationally, less than one -third addresses the needs of older users. Member Schold Davis said she would like Edina to address the needs of its diverse population. Continuing, she said the five A's of senior friendly transportation that realtors and others may begin using to score communities are: 1) Availability; 2) Acceptability; 3) Accessibility; 4) Adaptability; and 5) Affordability and she recommended that the ETC use these as measuring tools. HUMAN SERVICES TASK FORCE A request was made for a volunteer to serve on this task force to make recommendation how the City should spend its human services funds. Member Braden volunteered and Member Schold Davis volunteered to be her back -up. 1 COMMISSION DISCUSSION Format for forwarding recommendations to the Council Chair Janovy said at the last meeting two recommendations were made to the Council that have not yet been submitted because there is not a proper way to do so currently and she asked for suggestions. Members Braden and McKlveen each suggested a format. TLC Grant Update Assistant city engineer Sullivan said the BETF has a workshop scheduled for August 3 with the City Council and Manager Neal and this topic will be discussed. He anticipates drafting a formal response to the TLC following the meeting. Discussion ensued regarding the 3 -to -2 lane conversion on Valley View Road; Director Houle, consultant (WSB) and TLC working together to develop a plan for the 8/3 meeting; whether or not residents on Wooddale were surveyed; and building ramps parallel to crosstown to avoid the Valley View intersection. Motion was made by Member McKleven and seconded by Member Thompson to recommit their support of the project to secure the TLC grant and to endorse the 3 -to -2 lane conversion on Valley View Road. All voted aye. Motion carried. France Avenue corridor update /pedestrian bridge Assistant city engineer Sullivan said the ETC's recommendation to Council was to support significant enhancement of at grade crossing along France Avenue from crosstown to TH -494 and not'support the bridge: He said staff is moving forward with the RFP to secure funding of the bridge. During discussion, it was noted that the cost of the bridge is approximately $3 -5M with $1.5M in federal grant and the rest would come from TIF funds. Staff was asked why they were continuing to support the bridge. Mr. Sullivan said when the application was done, there were strong support for the bridge, especially during the W. 70th Street (France to TH- 100) planning. He said at that time, current plans by Three Rivers District was not known but it does not mean that modifications cannot be made to align the bridge with their plan. Motion was made by Member Bonneville and seconded by Member Nelson that the ETC reiterate their prior recommendation that. the bridge not be built for lack of information and high cost; lack of public input; not knowing connectivity; will not serve users on France Avenue; lack of justification; not warranted for usage; and not judicious, efficient use of public dollars. Rollcall: Ayes: Bass, Bonneville, Braden, Nelson, Janovy, Schold Davis Nays: Franzen, Thompson Motion carried. Temporary traffic control zones and Temporary speed table Assistant city engineer Sullivan said at the last Council meeting questions were raised regarding the meaning of "road closed to thru traffic" and "road closed' signs at the W. 44th and W. 70th Streets reconstruction projects. He said both streets are heavily used and are currently detoured for reconstruction. He said "road closed to thru traffic" sign means that if you are not a resident on that street or visiting a business, you should not be using that street; and "road closed" means there is activity going on that will prevent you from getting thru, even for residents on that street. Accessing north /south streets by crossing a closed street is not allowed. Mr. Sullivan said these areas are generally patrolled by the police. Temporary Installation of speed table was authorized by Council on Sunnyside Road, east of Townes Road, due to drivers not using the detour as directed and the goal is to readjust drivers' behavior. Currently, there is not policy in place for the use of speed table; one will need to be developed. 2 Living Streets RFP update Staff is finalizing the RFP and members have recommended some firms to receive it. Bike Edina Task Force Update Chair Johnson has stepped down and the leadership is shared with co- chairs Peter Kelly and Brad Chappey. Discussion took place regarding the structure of the BETF and if it would like to remain independent, become a committee of the ETC, or be its own board or commission and this came up because the ETC bylaw does allow for a committee. Grandview Small Area Study Update Member Nelson said they have not been able to attend the meeting as the schedule is the same as the ETC; however a letter of interest were issued to select a consultant to assist in the process and they are reviewing those letters tonight. 44th and 70th Street Updates W 44 th was discussed earlier and is progressing; phase 1 of W. 70th Street was paved yesterday and the goal is to open this phase before school begins. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS None CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Member Nelson asked if there is a plan for reconstructing concrete streets. Mr. Sullivan said most of the concrete streets still have some time to before needing to be replaced and they are also much more expensive than asphalt. He said they are putting together a plan for concrete street replacement. Member Franzen said the presentation on transportation options for seniors was intriguing and warrant more discussion and perhaps subcommittee to do more research. Member Schold Davis said she would be happy to help with a. subcommittee. She said there are some counties that are starting the discussion that they could probably become involved with. Member Bonneville said they should look at the intersection at Interlachen Blvd where it crosses Vernon by the gas station because it is a difficult intersection. He said perhaps the ETC can lend some support to the small area planning group to look at it. Member Bass gave the following update on the state's budget as provided by a TLC staff: commuter and passenger rail routes remained uncut; transit fares are expected to remain the same; metro area transit service to remain intact; may be slight reduction in a few cities and suburban routes; federal contribution expected to be reduced; MetCouncil received $20M in state bonds to conduct additional studies on new corridors; bicycle and pedestrian trails were included in a $500M bonding bill; Complete Streets legislation remain intact; and the budget for roads and transportation increased. Member Thompson said he received an email from Lynette that was sent by a resident on Pointe Dr. regarding the number of garbage trucks on his street and why the City did not have just one hauler. Chair Janovy said she referred him to the chair of the Energy and Environment Commission. STAFF COMMENTS None. ADJOURNMENT Motion was made Member Bass and seconded by Member Braden to adjourn. All voted aye. Motion carried. MINUTES OF THE CITY, OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM JUNE.,160 2011 6:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to.o'rder'by chair Janovy. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Bass, Bonneville, Braden; Franzen, Janovy, Schold Davis, Thompson and Nelson. 111. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Chair Janovy proposed to change the meeting agenda to go to Item VI.0 immediately upon Mr. Steve Clark's arrival; Living Streets will include discussion on.SHIP funding update, Commissioner Bass' funding update and Commissioner Braden's report on her conversation with a staff from the Humphrey Institute. Commissioner Bonneville asked to add updates on W. 44th St. and Chair Janovy recommended that he sign up for City Extra to receive weekly updates on any project in addition to monthly updates from Mr. Sullivan. Commissioner Franzen moved to approve the amended meeting agenda and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Schold Davis. All voted aye. Motion carried. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval of Minutes -- Regular meeting of May 19,'2011 B. Traffic Safety Report of June 1, 2011 Regarding Section B, page 2, chair Janovy asked if,the City has a written policy on "Child at Play" or similar signs. Assistant city engineer Sullivan said the City does not have -a written policy and they are being removed during street reconstruction, or not being replaced when they become worn. She also inquired about "guy with flag" and similar signs and if they can be placed in the parking lane. Mr. Sullivansaid staff would prefer that they are not placed in the parking lane and being used short term when children are playing does not present a problem. Commissioner Schold Davis said she has observed the signs in areas where there are no children present and they are placed far out into the street. Commissioner Nelson asked °about section D, item 5, where Mr. Tate suggested observation at the curve of Blake Rd around Mirror Lake to see if a slower speed sign should:be posted.' He said he.observed a driver going around the curve at a high speed that went across the street and hit the curb. Mr. Sullivan said he will be looking to see if a lower speed sign should be posted. Commissioner Nelson motioned to approve the consent agenda and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Thompson. All voted aye. Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT None. 1 VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS A. Transportation Commission Ordinance Update The ordinance was approved by Council said chair Janovy. B. Living Streets Policy Update Mr. Sullivan said the SHIP funding ($15,000) was approved by the City Council and the next step is to identify a consulting firm that can assist with writing :the RFP. Commissioner Bass said Blue Cross is offering a one -day policy development workshop at no cost (a $7,000 value) to the ETC, including elected - officials, members from other commissions and the general public. Commissioner Franzen 'motioned to accept'the donation and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Braden. All voted aye. Motion carried. Discussion included: • Commissioner Braden's inquired of the Humphrey Institute if they were working on Living Streets and the person she spoke with expressed a willingness to. meet with the ETC. • Workshop consultants could help in determining how to spend the funds (must be used by August 31). • Have consultant attend workshop to see public's reaction. • Use some of the funds for ordinance /policy updates. • RFP to be written by staff and - distribute to ETC; staff will also select the consulting firm. C. Bike Boulevards for Transit for Livable Communities (TLC) Mr. Sullivan said the $250,000 grant application that was approved by TLC in 2009 for bike lanes in Edina was discussed at the last Council meeting. He said the bike lanes would start at France Avenue and W. 54th Street (with a connection into Minneapolis), west to Wooddale Avenue to Valley View Road, under crosstown to W. 691h Street and to W. 70th Street. Mr. Sullivan said Council would like a model project but there are some hurdles to work through and asked the ETC to work with TLC regarding the design and for the ETC to engage the public and report-back to Council for implementation in 2012. Chair Janovy said the BETF will also weigh-in: She made reference to an anti -bike letter in the Edina Sun - Current and said it shows confusion about where bike belongs. She explained that the concept is largely sharrows and bike may use full lane. She said if she understood correctly, the plan coming forward did not meet intended goals of funding: Mr. Steve. Clark, of TLC, said that in a construction approval memorandum to MnDOT, the engineering consulting firm explained that part of the application was not <realistic because they probably would not be able to remove parking,, and therefore, the plan was have sharrows and use lane signs in those areas. He said the original application submitted in 2008 had some merits but did not quite go far:enough. He said TLC worked with city engineer Houle and BETF to bring.it to best practices for bicyclists, and the 2009 revision included a willingness to explore bike lanes on both Valley View Road and Wooddale Avenue which would: require removal of parking on Wooddale. He said a parking study could be done to determine parking needs on Wooddale, but in his observation, there appear to be driveways and garages that allows for adequate off- street parking. He said if the roadway has at least 2000 cars, it is best to.have dedicated bike lanes to remove conflicts and the law allows this. He said on Wooddale, parking would need to be removed, while Valley View would be a road diet going from 3, to 2 lanes. He said in his observation, the center lane did not appear to be used often but this may require an:engineer study. He said the 3 to 2 lane conversion was not in writing but there seerried'to be'a willingness to explore this. He said city of Richfield is narrowing lanes to 10 ft. to accommodate 5 -6 ft. bike lane, and while Mn /Dot does not like this, it is happening more often nationally. Regarding 54th Street, Mr. Clark said there is no need to remove parking, instead he suggested having reverse stop signs to make it easier for bicyclists and add diverters to discourage cars from using it. He said the application does not have much detail for making this street bike friendly. Mr. Clark explained further that most of the money would be spent at Valley View and TH -62 to redesign the area and that a consultant and city engineer Houle have already created a design but this is not necessarily the final solution. Additionally, he said the project is challenging because Edina is not a grid system and the current locations seem to be the most direct routes. Discussion ensued as follows: • 70th St. has roundabouts going in that is not "compatible to bikes, even after planning for so long. Mr. Clark said bikes lanes are - not recommended for roundabouts, sharrows are better. He said bikes are to use roundabouts just like cars with sharrows and for those not comfortable being in roundabout with cars, install sidewalk and crosswalk. Sharrows are not planned for roundabouts for lack of space according to city engineer Houle and it is too late for ramps. Consider discussion to retrofit the roundabouts at a later time. • 54th, Wooddale, Valley View, 69th are all state aid roads that requires adherence and Edina has never requested a variance for a 10 ft. lane; not know sure if other communities have done this. •. What is the consequence for eliminating parking on Wooddale? Mostly used by contractor vehicles now it seem. • Mr. Clark met yesterday with his committee and told them that a resolution supporting the project was coming and he will report to the board that there isn't a motion now to move forward or withdraw funds. • Is the 54th bridge wide enough? Mr. Sullivan said it needs to be replaced but no funding at this time for replacement. • Do not have a way to approach the parking issue; on W. 70th and other projects, parking always wins over bike lanes. How do you determine the value of parking since parking always wins out over everything else? • Council wants this moving forward, engaging with public, - resolve parking, etc. ETC would help with engaging residents on issues such as parking. • Residents will feel threatened about losing parking and the City does not have a parking policy;, already knows how it will end. • Should be working with a firm that has experience with bike boulevard, etc. Mr. Sullivan said there is no money to pay a firm and they will not hire a firm until the major concerns are identified and worked out. • 40th Street River Lake Bike Blvd is the closest bike boulevard to Edina to see an example of one. • About 90% of the routes are feasible and maybe Mr. Clark can talk with his colleagues to get suggestion for safer solutions. • Need to have conversation at a higher level first before engaging the community; let community know this is not for speeding cyclists but for children and regular cyclists. b • People's exposure now is negative and Edina is not ready for cycling. 3 • Bridge over TH -62 could score high for funding. • Mr. Clark said his time is being redirected to other planning studies for projects that are shovel- ready. He said he needs to know if the City is serious and if the community is ready for this type of project. He said the board has other projects with community support but no money; therefore, they are looking at projects without community support to pull money from. He said he does not like removing parking when there aren't off - street parking options and Wooddale has large residential houses with off- street parking options. He said if parking cannot be removed from Wooddale and having 3 years to consider this his recommendation would be to spend the money elsewhere.' He said the public process is important to get the community's feedback.` • Council direction was not very clear as to what they want ETC to do, getting clarification through the City Manager. • Engineer said certain things weren't feasible as indicated in 2009 application; certain sections puts funding in jeopardy and TLC will not accept watered down modification; sharrows do not increase ridership, but bike lanes do; can have some sharrows.but they should not:be the majority. • Next Tuesday staff is meeting with Council and can outline the concern to see how they want to proceed. Commissioner Thompson motioned that they move forward with pursuing the $250,000 and that they do the best they can in meeting original application and avoid watering it down. Discussion • Need Council's commitment immediately or could lose the money. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Nelson. Discussion • Include in memo to Council that they are aware that parking will be an issue along the route and issue at crosstown intersection and at roundabouts that have not been,solved at this time. All voted aye. Motion carried. D. Safe Routes to School Application Update Mr. Sullivan said an application was submitted yesterday and they should know by August if approval was granted for the South View campus for approximately $500,000. E. France Avenue Study Mr. Sullivan explained the following: • Past assistant city manager worked on the plans for the 72nd St. Bridge and he is working to fill in the gaps that exist today; current plan is to do an RFP at this time; Council needs to be brought up -to- date. • 2007 concept plan included two bridges — one at 69`h St. to connect with proposed trail but the trail is crossing at the Galleria instead at grade level. • Original estimated cost was $23M but it could now be $3.5M and the original design was for access to the neighborhoods, not to connect with the trail. • At -grade crossing was suggested with bikers walking their bike across. • TIF money may not be available. Motion by Commissioner Nelson to not support the bridge at the current location and to support significant enhancement improvements to facilitate at -grade crossing and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Bass. All voted aye. Motion carried. 4 Discussion • France Avenue Study was commissioned by the City and Hennepin County's Housing, Community Works and Transit Department. It is not known whether it has the support of Hennepin County Transportation or Public Works Departments. F. Bike Edina Task Force Update None G. Grandview Small Area Study Update There is a transportation subcommittee that Commissioners Bonneville and Nelson serves on; however, the rest of their meeting dates conflicts with the meeting dates of the ETC. H. ETC Bylaws After brief discussion, Commissioner Thompson motion to accept what is in the packet and revisiting by year's end and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Bonneville. All voted aye. Motion carried. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS None. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Commissioner Bonneville requested monthly updates on W. 44th Street and W. 70`h Street. IX. STAFF COMMENTS Mr. Sullivan said on W. 70th Street curbs for the roundabouts at the east end will be poured this week and the 24" gas main will be complete by the end of the month; regarding W. 44th, the contractor's meeting just took place and the gas company should be starting within 10 days. Sanitary sewer lift at 42 "d has a foul smell, said chair Janovy. X. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Franzen moved to adjourn the meeting and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Braden. All voted aye. Motion passed. 6111 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL JUNE 7, 2011 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. It. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. 111. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving the consent agenda with the exception of Items IV.A., Approval of Minutes — Regular Meeting of May 17, 2011, Work Session of May 17, 2011 and Work Session Two of May 3, 2011; IV.H., Award of Bid Contract PIN 11 -1 — New Water Treatment Plant No. 6 (continued from May 17, 2011); IV.K, Engineering Proposal for Construction Phase Services for Water Treatment Plant No. 6; IV.M., Engineering Proposal for Bike Boulevard for Transit for Livable Communities; and, IV.N., Resolution 2011 -67, Approving Second Amendment to Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement for Jerry's Parking Ramp, as follows: mee%iRg minbites of May 3,2011 IV.B. Review payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated May 19, 2011, and consisting of 29 pages; General Fund $314,031.96; Communications Fund $520.68; Police Special Revenue $2,224.45; Working Capital Fund $1,842.46; Equipment Replacement Fund $170,860.95; Art Center Fund $779.25; Golf Dome Fund $11,197.15; Aquatic Center Fund $8,000.27; Golf Course Fund $22,410.48; Ice Arena Fund $11,054.93; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $10,857.00; Liquor Fund $242,739.63; Utility Fund $60,376.99; Recycling Fund $38,820.60; PSTF Agency Fund $3,270.18; Payroll Fund $562.50; TOTAL 5899.549.48 and for approval of payment of claims dated May 26, 2011, and consisting of 34 pages; General Fund $129,312.96; Communications Fund $1,595.46; Police Special Revenue $3,399.27; Working Capital Fund $133,133.47; Equipment Replacement Fund $134,031.55; Art Center Fund $1,135.13; Golf Dome Fund $156.57; Aquatic Center Fund $19,997.78; Golf Course Fund $15,066.00; Ice Arena Fund $3,800.10; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $11,006.70; Liquor Fund $186,999.86; Utility Fund $58,863.87; Storm Sewer Fund $10,102.28; Recycling Fund $32.69; PSTF Agency Fund $7,353.73; Payroll Fund $5,036.64; TOTAL 5721.024.06 and for approval of payment of claims dated June 2, 2011, and consisting of 26 pages; General Fund $49,403.95; Communications Fund $285.00; Police Special Revenue $814.21; Working Capital Fund $106,888.32; Equipment Replacement Fund $5,431.40; Art Center Fund $16,584.62; Golf Dome Fund $2,765.00; Aquatic Center Fund Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 7. 2011 $1,149.60; Golf Course Fund $16,927.96; Ice Arena Fund $1,081.09; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $23,355.03; Liquor Fund $130,923.86; Utility Fund $17,656.48; Storm Sewer Fund $7,974.03; PSTF Agency Fund $4,759.15; Payroll Fund $3,093.40; TOTAL $389.093.10 IV.C. Award of Bid Contract ENG 11 -1- West 69th Street Mill and Overlay, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Bituminous Roadways, Inc. at $105,788.00. IV.D. Award of Bid Contract ENG 11 -3 - Norma ndale /Valley View Roads and Interlachen Boulevard Sidewalks, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, G.L. Contracting, Inc. at $248,185.70. IV.E. Award of Bid Contract ENG 11 -6 - Carson's Hill Neighborhood Reconstruction, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Midwest Asphalt Corporation at $1,758,163.00. IV.F. Award of Bid Contract ENG 11 -7 - West 44th Street Improvements, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Northwest Asphalt, Inc. at $2,322,814.58. IV.G. Award of Bid Contract ENG 11 -10 - Golf Terrace Neighborhood Reconstruction, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Palda & Sons, Inc. at $2,221,734.11. 119 I Award of 13id G-entraetW33- 3 n OWN LeiateF T.e.at -m-e nt Plan'-; No a (se.RtaR..e.d from nn,.. g 7 IV.I. Adopt Resolution No. 2011 -64, Approving Cooperative Agreement Between the City of Bloomington and the City of Edina regarding Living Streets. IV.J. Adopt Resolution No. 2011 -66 Approving Special Assessment Agreement with Galleria Shopping Center. IV.L. Approve Engineering Proposal for material testing for ENG 10 -3 West 70th Street Improvements .. Dr 1 f8F Qikee Qw..le. %Q2rd- for Transit far. 1 • able Gam . ot*p IVIMI Engineeril Ig-1 1 vpvia vr��asrer: elaa 119 h,_— Qncslulinn�• 011_C7�_nnr�..l.. Se�e.e. d A PaFkaRg De F*p .. �.�o.�.�.o,.zo =: vs'7- -I- Ijaplv7Trrs�CCO�IG Amendment to- Easement and IV.O. Adopt Resolution 2011 -65, Approving Cooperative Agreement with BCA. IV.P. Adopt Resolution No. 2011 -53, Approving Joint Powers Agreement with City of Richfield regarding water service. IV.Q. Approve Engineering Proposal for Construction Phase Services for West 44th Street Improvements. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA IV.A. REGULAR AND WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 17, 2011, AND WORK SESSION MEETING MINUTES OF MAY 3,2011 - APPROVED AS AMENDED Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, correcting the regular meeting minutes of May 17, 2011, page seven, paragraph four, to add: "Member Swenson suggested a joint meeting with the Planning Commission to discuss how rooftop dining could potentially be phased in at a later date this fall." Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 7. 2011 Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving the regular meeting minutes of May 17, 2011, as corrected, and the work session meeting minutes of May 17, 2011, and work session meeting minutes of May 3, 2011, as submitted. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV.H. AWARD OF BID CONTRACT PW 11 -1 — NEW WATER TREATMENT PLANT NO. 6 (CONTINUED FROM MAY 17, 2011) IV.K. ENGINEERING PROPOSAL APPROVED FOR CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES FOR WATER TREATMENT PLANT NO.6 IV.N. RESOLUTION 2011 -67 ADOPTED — APPROVING SECOND AMENDMENT TO EASEMENT AND PARKING RAMP AGREEMENT FOR JERRY'S PARKING RAMP Director of Public Works /City Engineer Houle provided an overview of the water treatment plant construction project to be located in the lowest level of Jerry's parking ramp that had been used to park maintenance equipment. He noted this project would eliminate the water treatment plant at 50th and Wooddale and combine treatment of four wells in the future. Staff noted the City had exclusive use of the lower level right -of -way easement, which would be acted on by the Housing and Redevelopment Authority at a later date. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving award of Bid Contract PW 11 -1, new Water Treatment Plant No. 6, to the recommended low bidder, Municipal Builders, Inc. at $5,668,800.00; authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to execute the Professional Service Agreement with AECOM Technical Services; and, introduction and adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -67, approving second amendment to Easement and Parking Ramp Agreement for Jerry's parking ramp. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV.M. ENGINEERING PROPOSAL FOR BIKE BOULEVARD FOR TRANSIT FOR LIVABLE COMMUNITIES TABLED Mr. Houle presented the request for design services for a bike boulevard, noting a $250,000 federal grant had been received for this project's infrastructure improvements. He stated staff had initially considered doing this project in- house, but determined the project was too involved. Mr. Houle explained that if an RFP process was required to use the grant for consulting services, this project would be delayed about a month and a half. Steve Clark, Transit for Livable Communities (TLC), stated the grant award had been approved in 2009, and the TLC Board had hoped this project would get underway in 2009. He explained that a firm sunset date on the funding was not set, but the Board's goal with all the projects was to get the very best outcome. For this reason, the Board was extremely patient with managing authorities. It was noted the goal of Congress when establishing this $25 million pilot program was to change travel behavior to reduce reliance on vehicles. Mr. Clark stated the Board's concern was that Edina's proposed project had become more of a share - the -road approach to erect signs or place sharrows in the roadways, which may not be enough to change travel behavior. With regard to funding consulting services from the grant, Mr. Clark explained that in 2009 the TLC allowed ten - percent of the total cost to be applied to engineering services. Since that time, Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 7, 2011 other jurisdictions have brought to the Board's attention that ten - percent was not enough because of the large and often controversial scope of the projects. Mr. Clark stated the Board had become more flexible with the .percentage allowed to cover engineering costs. Mr. Clark indicated he did, not think an RFP process would be required. The Board would prefer to complete a.project in 2012 that served the interests of this community as a model rather than rush the process and get a project that was less than satisfactory. In .addition, if the project constructed should deviate from the design - #hat the grant had been based on, the project could lose funding. The Council asked about the potential to receive an increased grant award if the project took more time to redesign and resulted in a groundbreaking and model project. Mr. Clark.stated the Board would consider that request if convinced the project was an enhancement over the original submittal. In the case of.Edina's project, Mr. Clark felt there was room for exploration to remove parking along Wooddale and place bike lanes so a stronger project could 'be created. Mr. Houle indicated that the Bike Edina Task Force has seen the feasibility study and application; however, the public process and informational meetings remain to be held in late July /early August. With regard to the sunset date, Mr. Clark explained there was not a firm sunset date, but the award letter for all projects funded in 2009 indicated the projects must be completed or well underway by 2010. If a project did not have much forward movement, the Board may consider reprograming those grant funds. The Board would want to know that Edina could complete a project where the grant investment resulted in a project meeting program goals. The Council emphasized that this project had great value for Edina, noting the bikeway provided connectivity across the freeway with neighborhoods, and Southdale Center and a park with an outdoor pool. It was acknowledged there had been no visible progress as intended when the grant was given in 2009 and ,the design had been reduced to lane sharing and sharrows. Following discussion, the Council indicated its intent to move forward with the bicycle boulevard project, support the use of grant funds to pay for consulting services, and develop a showcase design so there was opportunity for additional grant funding. Mr. Clark was asked for assurances that this project had value to, and the support of TLC. Mr. Clark stated he found the Council's commitment to the project to be reassuring. He indicated he was not convinced that an RFP- process would be required, but TLC would want to assure 'a level of commitment by both the Public Works Department staff and the selected consultant to work with TLC to create the best design feasible and engage the public. Mr. Houle recommended the Council consider a resolution stating its commitment to the bike boulevard project for submission to the TLC for its June board %meeting. In addition, TLC could be asked for a written confirmation that an extension 'woulcl be granted to the summer of 2012 to assure public participation and the development of a showcase bike trail design. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, directing staff to prepare a resolution of support for the Transit for Livable Communities Grant bike boulevard. project. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 7, 2011 Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, tabling consideration of the proposal for design services for the Transit for Livable Communities Grant for a bike boulevard project. Member Sprague made a motion amending the original motion, seconded by Member Swenson,. to also direct staff to seek grant dollars to fund consulting services. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle,.Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion to amend carried. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried as amended. CITY ENGINEER'S COMMENTS Mr. Houle reported that bids on the Council's agenda reflected a savings from the engineer's estimate ranging from four percent (roadway projects) up to fifteen percent. He added that fewer contractors were submitting bids and the bids were coming in closer to the engineer's estimates. The Council commended staff for its expertise and accuracy of estimating project costs. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V.A. DOUG JOHNSON DAY IN EDINA PROCLAIMED Mayor Hovland read in full a proclamation declaring "Doug Johnson Day" in Edina on June 11, 2011. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving the proclamation declaring "Doug Johnson Day" in the City of Edina. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Doug Johnson, former Edina Public Schools Director of Community Education Services & Community Relations, stated his appreciation for this honor and commented on the importance . of working together. The Council and audience responded with a round of applause. Vl. COMMUNITY COMMENT James Grotz, 5513 Park Place, addressed the Council regarding the Minnehaha Woods reconstruction project and concern that a larger water line would be required to obtain a future building permit. VII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS VII.A. REQUEST FOR MINOR CHANGES TO BUILDING — WATERS SENIOR HOUSING PROJECT — CONTINUED TO JUNE 21, 2011 Planning Director Teague. presented the proposed changes to the building proposed for the Waters Senior Housing project to- reduce the building by. 28 feet, which would reduce the infrastructure cost and enable them to provide seven affordable units. The building modification would eliminate 36 of the 90 underground parking spaces. Twelve of these spaces were double spaces primarily used:for:car /boat storage. Of the 735 Urface spaces, three would be lost, leaving 124 total parking spaces. Mr. Teague noted the preliminary plat approval had expired so. the proponent must make a new application for consideration at public hearings by the Planning Commission and City Council.. He explained that staff considered the proposed changes to be Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 7.2011 minor;. however, if the Council believed the changes were significant enough for further review, the proposal could be referred to the Planning Commission for an amendment to the site plan approval. Jay Jensen, Waters Senior Living, confirmed that 28 feet of common area would be removed from the middle of the building to help fund the seven affordable housing units: Mr. Jensen stated the removal of the 28 feet of common area would not affect the operation of the project. The Council discussed the threshold under which a revision would be considered a "minor change" and acknowledged e= mails asking'.that staff not be allowed to make this decision. The Council indicated that after-= study of the materials, it'would support a two -week continuation to give the public an opportunity to'submit written comment. The majority of the Council indicated the proposed revision would not meet the threshold of requiring a public hearing. Member Bennett referenced Code Section 850.04, sub. 9, Changes to Approvedr Final Site Plan, and explained why she found the specificity of the code .language allowed no other opportunity but to send this revision back to the Planning Commission for consideration and a public process. She noted the change resulted in a reduction in the building and also in parking.' Member Bennett said the ordinance language does not reference whether the change, involved a reduction or lessened intensity of the use. The. Council debated the issue and indicated the threshold for "minor change" would be addressed at the June 21, 2011, meeting. It was noted staff had determined, in its professional opinion, the requested change was minor and could be considered by staff or the Council without going through a public hearing process. The Council agreed that if its majority did not find the changes to be minor, the application would be remanded to the Planning Commission. It was acknowledged that the proponent stated that the proposal would be withdrawn if not approved as a minor change, and the project built as approved without any units designated affordable. The Council indicated this was "new ground ", so it preferred to err on the side of caution and obtain public comment prior to making a determination. It was noted. the Council's policy was to consider the request if changes were made to the final plan. Mr. Teague stated this had been the policy for two years, that it had worked well, and he recommended the policy- be codified into the ordinance. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to continue consideration of- proposed changes to the Waters Senior. Housing project to.allow time to identify the impacted area, provide mailed notice that this item would be considered at the June 21, 1011, meeting, and request electronic comment. Ayes: Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Nays: Bennett Motion carried. VII.B. RESOLUTION NO. 2011-58 ADOPTED — ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explain ed'that,in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by, R,esolutic n ,and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -58 accepting various donations. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Rollcall: Page 6 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 7. 2011 Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.C. PARK BOARD REAPPOINTMENT APPROVED Member Swenson made . a motion, ` seconded by Member Bennett, approving Park Board reappointment of David Deeds with to a term expiring February 1P 2014. Ayes: Bennett,'Brindle; Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.D. ORDINANCE NO. 2011-07 ADOPTED — PROHIBITING ROOFTOP DINING Mr. Teague reviewed that at.its May 17, 2011 meeting, the Council had directed'staff to -draft an ordinance that prohibited rooftop dining. It was noted that a Planning Commission work session would be scheduled to discuss rooftop restaurants and the Council's concerns related to such a use. The Council discussed a °language revision to address podium or balcony dining. 'Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2011 -07, amendment prohibiting rooftop restaurants in the City of Edina, as revised to indicate: "A restaurant or any portion of a restaurant open to customers, on the roof covering any part of the building'or restaurant:' Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VII.E. ORDINANCE NO. 2011 -10 ADOPTED — AMENDING SECTION 1509 TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Assistant City Engineer Sullivan presented revised Ordinance No. 2011 -10 amending Section 1509 regarding the Edina Transportation Commission's (ETC) purpose and duties. He stated the ETC met on May 19, 2011, to discuss the Council's concerns expressed at its-May 17, 2011, meeting relating to the potential process for' capital improvement: project review and citizen traffic complaint reports. Mr. Sullivan explained that a sample document would be drafted that could be attached to the ETC's bylaws to assure all understood the process and timeline. The Council indicated support for the amendment that provided structure for the ETC to be visionary and allow an opportunity to interact with issues raised. that affect traffic. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, to grant First and waive Second Reading adopting Ordinance No. 2011 -10, amending the Edina City Code concerning the Transportation Commission. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Vlll. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS — Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt of various correspondence. IX. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS = Received IX.A. FOURTH OFJULY PARADE — COMBINED.ENTRYAPPROVED " Member Sprague ' made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, that the Council support. a combined entry, -to the extent possible, in the 2012 Fourth of July parade.. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Hovland Page 7 Minutes /Edina Citv.Council /June 7.2011 Motion carried. X. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received Xl. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:07 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. ManIgen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, June 21, 2011. James B. Hovland, Mayor Video Copy of the June 7, 2011, meeting available. Page 8 RESOLUTION NO. 2011-70 SUPPORTING BIKE BOULEVARD GRANT FROM TRANSIT FOR LIVABLE COMMUNITIES ty of Edina WHEREAS, the City of Edina Ci is committed to supporting the bicycling community by adopting a Comprehensive Bicycle Transportation Plan in 2007; WHEREAS, the Transit for Livable Communities has granted the City of Edina a grant for bike boulevard in the City; and WHEREAS, the City of Edina is committed to the completion of a successful project; and WHEREAS, the Edina Transportation Commission will be conducting the public process for this project and will require additional time to ensure the best project possible; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City C uncil requests the Transit for Livable Communities grant additional time to complete this project. ADOPTED this 7t" day of June, 2011. Attest: Debra A. Mangeh, City Clerk JarrYes B. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CLERK , Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution is a true and correct copy of the Resolution duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 7, 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said. Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this 1'7' -%ay of 20 �. i City Clerk City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952- 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 -826 -0379 • ;v v • vCORFOR�9 Mesa // P11 3a REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. VIII.D. From: Jesse Struve Utility Engineer ® Action a Discussion Information Date: August 3, 2011 Subject: Edina Energy and Environment Commission's Recommendation for Solar Panel Project ACTION REQUESTED: Accept the recommendation as provided by the Edina Energy and Environment Commission to not proceed with the proposed Solar Panel Project and associated energy efficiency package. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The Energy and Environment Commission (EEC) worked with staff to procure a grant from the Department of Energy in 2010. City staff hired the consulting firm of McKinstry earlier this year to develop a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the solar project and develop a preliminary cost breakdown. City Attorney, Roger Knutson, advised staff the overall project rate of return could not exceed financing terms. The solar project by itself would exceed the rate of return; therefore, McKinstry investigated various city facilities for energy saving measures. These projects were bundled into an energy efficiency package, including the solar panel grant, to meet the requirements set forth by state law. McKinstry presented the entire package to the EEC on July 9, 2011 and again during the EEC's July 21, 2011, meeting. Discussion at the July 21 meeting centered on the process used, lack of EEC involvement in developing the RFP, and how it is not economically feasible due to the low energy rate at City Hall. The EEC voted not in favor of recommending this project to the City Council. After the July 21 EEC meeting, staff was approached with new information related to the potential solar project. Due to scheduling difficulties and timeline, we are unable to include information in the packet, but may present new information at the August 3 Council Meeting. ATTACHMENTS: • August 2, 2010 Report / Recommendation — Request Authorization to Apply for Local Government Renewable Energy Grant. • January 18, 2011 Report / Recommendation — Energy & Environment Commission — Solar PV System for City Hall. • Energy and Environment 7/21/11 Draft Meeting Minutes regarding Solar Panel Project. • McKinstry's Calculations for Solar Project's Rate of Return and Cost Breakdown. • McKinstry's Cash Flow Analysis. • McKinstry's Facility Improvement Measure (FIM) Summary — Rough Order of Magnitude. Agenda Item III.E. Request Authorization to apply for Local Government Renewable Energy Grant CITY OF EDINA SOLAR PHOTOVOLTAIC PROJECT o Located on Roof of City Hall Building aIG i v 20 kw system will generate approximately I % of building's electricity a Approximately 95 solar panels will lie flat on roof o Display inside City Hall educates public on energy o Grant Funding Available from federal stimulus funding • Deadline to Apply: Wednesday, August 4, 2010 • Total Cost of Project: $205,000 ■ Federal stimulus grant - $82,000 ■ Xcel Solar Rewards rebate - $44,000 ■ In -kind donation of materials and supplies by Enhanced Home Systems - $60,000 ■ Funding needed from City - $18,700 v Electricity savings at 6cents /kwh - approx. $1,800 /yr a Return on Investment o City receives $205,000 project for $18,700 o Energy savings pays for city investment in less than 10 years, at current electricity rates Recommended by Edina Energy and Environment Commission m GreenStep Cities Best Practice — Renewable Energy o Reducing City Greenhouse Gas Emissions — ICLEI & Mayors Climate Protection Agreement o City Leads by Example -- Solar (City Hall), Geothermal (Public Works), Home Energy Squad /Edina Go Green (Community wide) o Provides real -time data and educational opportunity for linking with community education and Edina school district RE PO RPRECOM M E N DATIO N To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. IV. D. From: Eric Roggeman Assistant Finance Director ® Action Discussion Information Date: January 18, 2011 Subject: Energy & Environment Commission — Solar PV System for City Hall INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Surya lyer of the City's Energy & Environment Commission will give a presentation to Council on the solar photovoltaic system for the roof at City Hall. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Memo from EEC recommending Council action. 2. Budget request that was submitted with the official application 3. Budget estimate indicating the City's share of the investment under 3 scenarios To: Edina City Council From: Edina Energy Commission Date: January 13, 2011 Subject: Recommendation to Edina City Council to Approve Moving Forward with the City's Application to the State of Minnesota for a Solar Photovoltaic System for the City Hall Building The Edina Energy Commission (EEC) has approved a motion at its January 13, 2011 meeting requesting the Edina City Council to authorize City staff and the EEC to proceed with its application to the State of Minnesota Department of Commerce (Commerce) for a renewable energy grant to install a solar photovoltaic system on the roof of the Edina City Hall building. Specifically, the EEC requests the City Council to approve and authorize the following actions: 1. Authorize City Staff to complete the final phase of the City's grant application on behalf of the City with Commerce for the installation of the solar PV system. This involves completing the information requested by Commerce, including an updated budget and waste management plan. 2. Authorize City Staff to hire an engineering firm to perform preliminary design work to be included in a Request for Proposals (RFP) for the solar PV project. EEC Rationale for Supporting This Project: 1. The City will make a long term capital investment at a cost savings of approximately $100,000. The solar PV renewable energy project has an expected 30 year life span. The City has qualified for a state grant that will cover 40% of the project cost. We estimate the grant will be between $54,000 and $70,000; the City will know the exact amount after it opens bids and recommends a bid award. In addition, the project will receive an Xcel Energy rebate of $44,226. In sum, the City will receive an estimated $98,000 to $114,000 to finance this system. 2. In addition to the immediate savings from the state grant and utility rebate, the City will save at least $2,250 per year in electricity costs based on its current rates for at least the 30 year expected life of the system. As electricity rates increase in the future, this savings also grows, since all electricity produced by the solar PV system is free. 3. The solar PV system will serve as a symbol of the City's commitment to reduce its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, consistent with the City's membership in ICLEI's Cities for Climate Protection and the U.S. Conference of Mayors Climate Protection Agreement. 4. This system will be an important demonstration project and public education tool. The amount of energy that the system produces will be displayed in real time over the internet. The EEC intends to involve the Edina School District in this project, so that students can learn about both the technology and the environmental benefits from solar energy. In addition, the EEC intends to work with City staff to create a display in the City Hall lobby that educates the public about the impact of the solar PV system on the roof as well as other clean energy initiatives by the city, such as the ground source heat system at the new public works building, the Home Energy Squad project, WindSource, and other efforts. The two attachments include: (1) the City's budget request that was submitted with our official application on August 4, 2010; and (2) A budget estimate indicating the City's share of the investment under 3 scenarios, which reflect the estimated low bid in response to an RFP issued by the City this spring. The City's investment ranges from a low of $36,774 to a high of $60,774. The City Council will decide whether to go ahead with the project after bids are received and its actual cost is known. The EEC urges the City Council to approve the actions identified above so that the City can take advantage of this unique opportunity to obtain a renewable energy system with significant financial assistance. Local Government Renewable Energy Grant Program Attachment i Applications must be submitted using this document. Fill out additional attachments as required. Hppucant information Entity Name: City of Edina Minnesota Primary Project Contact: Heather Worthington Title: Assistant City Manager Contact's Email: hworthington @ci.edina.mn.us Phone number: 952.826.0415 Address: 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina Minnesota 55424 Applicant Type: Statutory City Applicant FEID #: Applicant DUNS Number: Drnio. -+ Infnrm o +inns Applicant Match Funds: $167,204.00 Percent of Total: 81.57% . 1. xr /r fijt"4:ri7 .s /.r's%f.+/.r` *!� /f�'f`'f'j� r?�� � "tsrrf?!r#' i ; � r �f rj:r,rr� F.%r' yfrf .er �sf r r�rr /1'f'�F•.•r;- n��'`•ffir !}%i:- rfl,�i>�r' Requested Grant Funds: $82,000.00 q'rd,;'> Percent of Total: 40.00% Rebates: $44,226.00 Percent of Total: 100.00% Total Project Cost: $204,978.00 Project start date: 10/15/10 Annual Cost Savings $2,250.00 Project end date: 09/15/11' Aggregate Payback: 91.10 Total Labor Hours: 394 Rana1e1ahln Fnprwv Tprhnnlnwv ri.P Total Cost Installation Location g G j J '! { �I -- a rjr ( 'r Y t _t9Ejs+t fl•!'7r �JX9r ;# il ✓ F rf /� ir { lfi ; r �l/lY,jRX , r r f�r f `� r // % 1r %, � � .f+l .2%' irl f # F t? }r r�j4�� �� f %�, f�.{r.. tr%«l.�t,� ,cfjr r � % ; X %/� . , tr''%%'rf r+ �if+%s'{;;ir'fJ+r '^ r rf /.irSrl' , ,e : f r T ry � : ' i " 5f �� e �j af Z ,ge n, f �+ t ,rfrhM of ri f��,%i /-)ryp J�r'✓r �t! /� yell .+ .r`'� rlLr, rl,c,r; _ NO??�311E C�,$ATIl,A:.,rfSt�fG�4ari�! kW -h 2000 kW -h , $204,978 Edina City Hall roof/ kW -h Tons Sq. Ft. BTU /Hr Official Certification : ertifying Official's Name (print): Heather Worthingon ertifying Official's Title: Assistant City Manager !� ertifying Official's Signature: F III / j4 !L' zt 9�/�4// �� c Date: Aug. 4, 2010 Minnesota Office of Energy Security PROJECT BUDGET Solar Photovoltaic System for City Hall, 4801 W. 50td Street, Edina, MN Solyndra Panels and Sunnyboy Inverters Permits and Engineering, Solyndra Modules and Sunny Boy Inverters 140,678 Paint Roof-White or Rerock . 10,000 Crane Service to Lift Equipment to Roof 3,000 Labor at D_ avis Bacon;Prevailing Wages 34,000 Module and'Rack Installation Inverter Installation Meter Work Panel, Work Service Panel 2000 Balance of System 9,000 Conduit, wire, misc. parts and supplies 1800 Total Budget 204,978 Three Scenarios To Illustrate Range of City Share of Solar PV System Assumptions: REBATE: 25,000 kwh system = $44,226 Xcel SolarRewards Rebate (Rebate is tied to size of system, not dependent on contractor's bid CITY EXPENSES: Any expenses the city incurs after the contract is entered with the state will count as part of the match it needs, such as labor for city to monitor, inspect, issue permits, prepare reports, process payments, etc. This will be in -kind city staff time. (Note: All expenses to prepare and issue the RFP will not qualify for cost - share). GRANT: State grant is 40% of the contractor bid CONTRACTOR BID: Three estimated bids to represent low, middle, and high end: $135,000, $150,000 and $175,000. Next Steps: Asking City Council for approval to request bids for project, with a City cost share likely to be in this range. City can reject all bids but would incur bid prep expenses (including some design). Under all scenarios, this is about a 4:1 return (City gets a system worth 4 times more than its cost) and there is an annual electricity savings of over $2,000 (at current rates) with a 30 year expected life, so it seems reasonable to ask approval to proceed. Low Estimate Bid: $1351000 Rebate: $44,226 40% Grant: $54,000 City Cost $36,774 Middle Estimate $150,000 $44,226 $60,000 $45,774 High Estimate $175,000 $44,226 $70,000 $60,774 Annual electricity cost savings: $2,250/yr (From proposal attachment 1) City electricity cost rate: 6 cents to 8 cents per kw (Confirm ?) Expected electricity production from 25 MW system: xxxx kw /yr DRAFT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION HELD AT CITY HALL July 21, 2011 7:06 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Latham called the meeting to order at 7:06 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Gubrud, Kata, Kostuch,,P Chair Latham. Absent: Members lyer, Pronove and Thompson Staff Present: Jesse Struve and Rebecca Foster ow III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Agenda was approved,as written. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Agenda was approved'as written. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT No one appeared for comment other than as ox VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS % 1`r ", A. Working Group Members. Motion made by Memb isser n AM David VanDongen to the Air Quality Working Group: Water Qua requested that Mary Jo Straub beMeleted from the WateKOuality indicated that she no longer has the time *fib pai ��. her past contributions. Motion madeby Memt Phil Hirschey to the Energy Working Group. M( Sierks to appro�vve'Carlin<Struckman to the:Educ; unanimouslVAMP /M B. Energy WG 1. Solar panel p reauirements a Public Coinmen Bill Glahn, 6634 John Spanhake, M tticiency project: John D1 olphin, 5809 Eas Greg Ne {f6120 Han Tim Rudrncki 1, 224 Lyn Bill Simmons: 56'161Wo ierks said that ;community a pate. C i, Risser, Sierks, Tucker, Zarrin, and conded by Member Paterlini to approve ity Working GroupqChair Susan Tucker Working Group because Ms Straub on Chair Latham thanked Ms Straub for 3ubrud and119tonded by Member Sierks to approve ..`�'�, n.made by Member- Gubrud and seconded by Member n;Outreach Working Group. Motion carried solar grant project fulfills one of the GreenStep Cities lar energy and energy efficiency. approves the {energy efficiency portion, but not the solar project. I not in favor of the solar project and would rather focus on the energy Dr, believes solar thermal has a better payback. , not in favor of the solar project because he believed the bid too high. approves the solar project. t Dr, approves the solar project. Chair Latham clarified that the bundling of the energy efficiency projects on the other municipal buildings with the solar grant project was recommended by McKinstry to achieve a shorter payback period. Commission members generally support an educational solar project pursuant to the AARA grant, but cannot support such a project when bundled together with other municipal building energy efficiency projects, which commissioners have not had an opportunity to study. Commissioners also had concerns about the 10K Solar bid price, which they believed was high. Commissioners furthermore had concerns about the RFP process used for the solar grant project, which was substantially different from the process used in the Recycling RFP. Staff 1 indicated at the July 6 Q & A with McKinstry that this was necessitated by the short time line required by the AARA grant deadline. Motion made by Member Sierks and seconded by Member Kostuch to approve McKinstry package of the grant solar panels for the City Hall roof and associated energy efficiency package for other city buildings as listed in the McKinstry hand out. 1 Aye, 7 Nays with the Chair not voting. Motion failed. Solar /wind ordinance amendments Task Force. The topic 3. PACE commercial energy district. Public Comment Brad Hanson, 5908 Chapel Dr., Edina, recomme properties. Motion made by Member Gubrud and b;thifd party financing model for commercial WON. Member Zarrin to accept Erie &y Working Group Resolution with the addition of the inclusion of residential oron'erty Motion Original Edina Grant Application Hall Rate Cost of System Cost of System $ 204,978 Output (kWh) $ 972 25,000 Annual Revenue $ 2,250 Assumed $ /kWh $ 0.090 Grant $ 82,000 Rebates $ 44,226 Remaining Cost $ 78,752 Resulting Payback 35.0 McKinstry's Calculations for Solar Project Rate of Return and Cost. Breakdown Grant Application w/ City Hall Rate Cost of System Cost of System $ 204,978 Output (kWh) $ 972 25,000 Annual Revenue $ 1,125 Usage Rate $ /kWh $ 0.045 Grant $ 82,000 Rebates $ 44,226 Remaining Cost $ 78,752 Resulting Payback 70.0 BP Solar PV Bid Results Cost of System Cost of System $ 204,694 Output (kWh) 24,000 Annual Revenue $ 972 Usage Rate $ /kWh $ 0.045 Grant $ 82,000 Rebates $ 53,460 Remaining Cost $ 69,234 Resulting Payback 71.2 Additional City Specific items included in pricing listed above Structural / Electrical Engr $ 14,500 This is for the structural /electrical engineering as well as bid document preparation Modifications to Roof $ 4,000 This is to allow access to the system for demonstration purposes Web - interface $ 8,500 This is for web access of the system and weather station we have included. Project Management $ 5,000 P &P Bonds $ 1,695 This is for payment and performance bonds for the contractors Installed System $ 170,999 This includes providing and installing the PV system by contractors financially sound enough to insure and bond the project Cost / Watt of system $ 6.84 This is still based on higher overhead contractors NREL Avg 2009 Cost $ 8.01 NREL Avg 2010 Cost $ 7.16 Bid Results after removing City Specific Costs BP Solar PV Bid Results Cost of System Cost of System $ 170,999 Output (kWh) 24,000 Annual Revenue $ 972 Usage Rate $ /kWh $ 0.045 Grant $ 82,000 Rebates $ 53,460 Remaining Cost $ 35,539 Resulting Payback 36.6 The rate the City pays for Electricity at City Hall is a very low rate A demonstration project for community awareness and behavior modification should have a more representative rate Dept of Energy, Avg Elec Rate in the U.S. is 11.9 cents in 2011 Xcel rate for MN avg is 11.3 cents plus riders If the City uses the residential rate (12 cents / kWh) for demonstration purposes Original Grant Application BP Solar PV Bid Results TenK Solar Bid Results Annual Revnue $ 3,000 Annual Revnue $ 2,880 Annual Revnue $ 3,870 Resulting Payback 26.3 Resulting Payback 24.0 Resulting Payback 15.9 If we remove the additional costs due to this being a City project and use the residential rate (Includes grant) Orielnal Grant Application BP Solar PV Bid Results TenK Solar Bid Results Annual Revnue $ 3,000 Annual Revnue $ 2,880 Annual Revnue $ 3,870 Resulting Payback 15.0 Resulting Payback 12.3 Resulting Payback 7.2 TenK Solar Bid Results Cost of System $ 276,616 Output (kWh) 32,250 Annual Revenue $ 1,306 Usage Rate $ /kWh $ 0.045 Grant $ 82,000 Rebates $ 132,975 Remaining Cost $ 61,641 Resulting Payback 47.2 TenK Solar Bid Results Cost of System $ 242,921 Output (kWh) 32,250 Annual Revenue $ 1,306 Usage Rate $ /kWh $ 0.045 Grant $ 82,000 Rebates $ 132,975 Remaining Cost $ 27,946 Resulting Payback 21.4 IIIS�'J/ rrermrrew=ff Cash Flow Analysis 6/16/2011 Customer: City of Edins Project Energy Con; Scenario: Rough Ordei Financing Source: TBD Financial Data for Scenario: First Cost Utility Rebate Net Customer Cost Initial Capital Infusion Amount Financed Annual Savings Cash FlowAnalysls Period Include Depreciation (1 =Yes, O =No) Life of Equipment (For Depreciation) Number of Years for O&M Savings Financing Term (Years) Annual Interest Rate % Scenario Simple Payback (yrs) Return on Invesment Internal Rate of Return Net Present Value (NPV) Year 10 Net Present Value (NPV) Year 15 Net Present Value (NPV) Year 20 Cash Flow Analysis: $754,156 $267,932 $486,224 $0 $486,224 $59,052 15.0 0.0 30.0 15.0 10.00 4.00% 8.23 12% #D1WOl $66,108 $270,986 $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 $200,000 $100,000 $0 Cumulative Cash Flnw z a 4 5 8 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Facility Improvement Measure TIM) Summary - Rough Order of Magnitude �of Edina ROM �. June 16. 2011 Description Building Budget Min Max Annual Utility �,aymgs Min Max Annual Potential Operational Savings Customer Budget Incentives) Cost (�qitn Simple (with Incentives) Payti Relamp T12 and 32W T8 lamps with 25W TS lamps. City Hall $9,857 $12,595 $1,208 $1,563 $110 $2,370 Min $7,487 Max $10,225 Min 4.5 Max 7.8 Lighting Install occupancy sensors where applicable. CH- Building Control of air leakage by sealing of gaps, cracks and City Hall $21,718 $27,751 $2,537 $3,283 $0 $0 $21,718 $27,751 6.6 10.9 Envelope holes using appropriate materials such as Fire Retardant, Poly Urethane Foam, caulks, and appropriate weather stripping materials. CH -Water on )on Install new low -flow fixtures to reduce water use I City Hall $15,384 $19,658 $848 $1,098 $0 $0 $15,384 $19,658 14.0 23.2 CH -25kW TenK Solar PV Install a 25 kW Solar PV system City Hall $272,825 $348,609 $1,110 $1,437 $0 $201,753 $71,072 $146,856 49.5 132.3 BA- Interior Relamp T12 and 32W T8 tamps with 25W TO lamps. Braemar $107,456 $137,305 $17,000 $22,000 $1,194 $36,081 $71,375 $101,224 3.1 5.6 Lighting Upgrade high bay lamps and fixtures. Install Arena occupancy sensors. Compact Fluorescent to LED BA -Water Install new low -flow fixtures to reduce water use Braemar $13,325 $17,026 $579 $749 $0 $0 $13,325 $17,026 17.8 29.4 BA- Building Control of air leakage by sealing of gaps, cracks and Braemar $39,002 $49,835 $4,021 $5,204 $0 $0 $39,002 $49,835 7.5 12.4 Envelope holes using appropriate materials such as Fire Arena Retardant, Poly Urethane Foam, caulks, and appropriate weather stripping materials. AC-Building Control of air leakage by sealing of gaps, cracks and Art Center $6,409 $6,409 $8,189 $801 $1,037 $0 $6,409 $8,189 6.2 10.2 Envelope holes using appropriate materials such as Fire Retardant, Poly Urethane Foam, caulks, and appropriate weather stripping materials. AC -Water Conservation Install new low -flow fixtures to reduce water use Relamp 712 and 32W TS lamps with 25W T8 lamps. Art Center $346 $442 $73 $94 $0 $0 $346 $442 3.7 6.1 FS1- Interior Fire Station $11,683 $14,929 $613 $794 1 $130 $4,428 $7,255 $10,501 7.9 14.1 Uahtlno D Conversion, #1 FSl -Water Conservation Install new low -flow fixtures to reduce water use while maintainina desired service, Fire Station #1 $4,017 $5,133 $321 $415 $0 $0 $4,017 $5,133 9.7 16.0 FS2- Building Control of air leakage by sealing of gaps, cracks and Fire Station $3,493 $4,463 $462 $597 $0 $0 $3,493 $4,463 5.8 9.7 Envelope holes using appropriate materials such as Fire #2 Retardant, Poly Urethane Foam, caulks, and appropriate weather stripping materials. FS2 - Interlor Relamp T12 and 32W T8 lamps with 25W T8 lamps. Fire Station $3,685 $4,709 $213 $276 $41 $1,355 $2,330 $3,354 7.4 13.2 Ughtng Incandescent to Compact Fluorescent Conversion. #2 FS2 -Water Install new low -flow fixtures to reduce water use while maintainlino desired service Fire Station #2 $454 $581 $34 $44 $0 $0 $454 $581 10.3 17.1 BC- Interlor Relamp T12 and 32W TS lamps with 25W T8 lamps. Braemar Golf $32,479 $41,501 $2,951 $3,819 $361 $13,113 $19,366 $28,388 4.6 8.6 Lighting New fixtures where recommended. Course BC- Bullding Control of air leakage by sealing of gaps, cracks and Braemar Golf $3,827 $4,890 $443 $573 $0 $0 $3,827 $4,890 6.7 11.0 Envelope holes using appropriate materials such as Fire Course Retardant, Poly Urethane Foam, caulks, and Clubhouse appropriate weather stripping materials. BC -Water Install new low -flow fixtures to reduce water use Braemar Golf $6,458 $8,252 $1,056 $1,366 $0 $0 $6,458 $8,252 4.7 7.8 j Conservation while maintaining desired service. Course Clubhougo I BM- Interior or Lighting Relamp T12 and 32W TB lamps with 25W T8 lamps. Install motion sensors. LED Exit conversion. Braemar Golf Course $9,244 $11,811 $1,092 41 $1,3 $103 $3,657 $5,587 $8,154 3.7 6.8 Maintenance BM- Bullding Envelope Control of air leakage by sealing of gaps, cracks and holes using appropriate materials such as Fire Braemar Golf Course $10,145 $12,963 $1,237 ;1,600 $0 $0 $10,145 $12,963 6.3 10.5 Retardant, Poly Urethane Foam, caulks, and Maintenance appropriate weather stripping materials. Bldg FC- Interior Lighting Relamp T32 and 32W TB lamps with 25W T8 lamps. Fred Richards Executive $4,381 ;5,598 $284 $368 $49 $940 $3,441 $4,658 8.3 14.0 FC- Building Envelope Control of air leakage by sealing of gaps, cracks and holes using appropriate materials such as Fire Retardant, Poly Urethane Foam, caulks, and Fred Richards Executive Clubhouse $1,215 $1,553 $111 $143 $0 $0 $1,215 $1,553 8.5 14.0 appropriate weather stripping materials. FC -Water Conservation Install new low -flow fixtures to reduce water use while maintaining desired service. Fred Rlchards Executive $1,025 $1,310 $41 $53 $0 $0 $1,025 ;1,310 19.4 32.1 EP- Interlor Lighting Relamp T12 and 32W T8 lamps with 25W T8 lamps. Upgrade high bay lamps and fixtures. Delamp Edinborough Park $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.0 0.0 EP- Building Envelope Control of alr leakage by sealing of gaps, cracks and holes using appropriate materials such as Fire Edinborough Park $25,940 $33,146 $4,635 $5,998 $0 $0 $25,940 $33,146 4.3 7.2 Retardant, Poly Urethane Foam, caulks, and appropriate weather stripping materials. EP -Water Conservation Install new low -flow fixtures to reduce water use while maintainina desi red service. Edlnborough $10,929 $13,965 $1,069 $1,384 $0 $0 $10,929 $13,965 7.9 13.1 PW- Bullding Envelope Control of air leakage by sealing of gaps, cracks and holes using appropriate materials such as Fire Public Works $31,894 $40,753 $3,971 $5,140 $0 $0 $31,894 $40,753 6.2 10.3 Retardant, Poly Urethane Foam, caulks, and appropriate weather stripping materials. PW -Water Conservation Install new low -flow fixtures to reduce water use II Public Works $4,681 $5,982 $524 $677 $0 $0 $4,681 $5,982 6.9 11.4 BD- Interlor BD- Building Envelope T12 to T8 conversion. Upgrade high bay lamps and u Control of air leakage by sealing of gaps, cracks and holes using appropriate materials such as Fire Braemar Golf p Braemar Golf Dome $10,965 $2,096 $14,011 $2,678 $1,202 $269 $1,556 $349 ;122 $0 $4,235 $0 $6,730 $2,096 $9,776 $2,678 4.0 6.0 7.4 9.9 Retardant, Poly Urethane Foam, caulks, and appropriate weather stripping materials. BD -Water Conservation ELV- Building Envelope Install new low -flow fixtures to reduce water use while Control of air leakage by sealing of gaps, cracks and holes using appropriate materials such as Fire Braemar Golf Dom. Edina Liquor Vernon $1,193 $6,318 $1,525 $8,073 $24 $476 $31 $615 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,193 $ 6,318 $1,525 $8,073 38.1 10.3 63. 0 17.0 Retardant, Poly Urethane Foam, caulks, and appropriate weather stripping materials. EL5- Bullding Envelope Control of air leakage by sealing of gaps, cracks and holes using appropriate materials such as Fire Edina Liquor 50th $911 ;1,164 $65 $84 $0 $0 $911 $1,164 10.9 18.0 Retardant, Poly Urethane Foam, caulks, and appropriate weather stripping materials. ELY - Building Envelope Control of air leakage by sealing of gaps, cracks and holes using appropriate materials such as Fire Retardant, Poly Urethane Foam, caulks, and Edina Liquor I York $5,954 $7,607 $683 $884 $0 ;0 $5,954 $7,607 6.7 11.1 appropriate weather stripping materials. PW -4pkW TenK Install a 40kW Solar PV system Public Works CH -40kW TenK Install a 40 kW Solar PV system City Hall EP -Pool Cover Install a pool cover In the natatorium Edlnborough Park =L- PW -25kW Solyndra Solar PV ELV- Interior ELS- Interior - Llahtlno ELY - Interior Llahitno Install a 25kW Solar PV Relamp T12 and 32W T8 lamps with 25W T8 lamps. Relamp T12 and 32W T8 lamps with 25W TS lamps: Relamp T12 and 32W T8 lamps with -25W T8 lamps. Public Works Edina Liquor Edina liquor Edina Liquor York - $3,074 - $6,403 $4,325 $3,928 $8,182 5,527 $245 $497 ;306 $317 $644 $396 ;34 $71 $48 - $0 $� - $3,074 $6,403 $3,928 $8,182 ; 8.8 9.0 14.1 14.4 $0 $4,325' - $5,527 9.7 - 15.6 mss Incenti— am rnntlnncnf ,.n R-1 ..........�i �..w ..� !k693,114 S885-645 $51.002 1 66 002 $2. 262 ='- 267.912 $425.182 $617,713 =.` 6.2 •• y . �.�� air onuwn or rererence only. of IV, lid •1vv • REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: VIII.E. From: Jack Sullivan, PE Assistant City Engineer ® Action Discussion Information Date: August 3, 2011 Subject: Edina Transportation Commission Recommendation for France Avenue Corridor ACTION REQUESTED: Below are two options regarding the review of the France Avenue Corridor. Staff recommends that City Council review both options prior to making a motion. The Edina Transportation Commission carried a motion reiterating their prior recommendation that the bridge not be built for lack of information and high cost; lack of public input; not knowing connectivity; will not serve users on France Avenue; lack of justification; not warranted for usage; and not judicious, efficient use of public dollars. 2. Staff recommends that a Request for Proposal be distributed to engineering firms for design of the 72nd Street pedestrian bridge over France Avenue and that the City move forward with construction of this pedestrian bridge. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: City Council directed the Transportation Commission (ETC) to look at France Avenue from Highway 62 to Highway 494 "holistically ". They asked that the ETC review past ideas, proposals and reports for the corridor and present recommendations back to the City Council. The ETC was presented with a number of previous planning documents that focused on the France Avenue Corridor. These documents included the Local Traffic Task Force, Greater Southdale Area Final Land Use and Transportation Study Report, France Avenue Corridor Study, Edina Promenade Urban Design Plan and the 72nd Street Pedestrian Bridge Federal funding application. Discussion at the ETC meetings centered on the concerns with the lack of safe pedestrian crossing of France Avenue. This issue was discussed in all of the previously listed documents. The concept of a grade separated crossing of France Avenue was studied in additional detail in the Edina Promenade Urban Design Plan created by URS in 2007. This study determined the most appropriate location to be at 72nd Street on the west side of France and between the Byerly's and Macy's Home Store on the east side. Assistant City Manager Heather Worthington was working closely with the Promenade improvements and spearheaded the application for Federal Transportation Enhancement Funds for the bridge. The City has been awarded one million dollars for construction of the pedestrian overpass. Staff believes this location is the most appropriate for a grade separated crossing for the following reasons: 1. The natural grade difference on the east side of France Avenue will minimize the bridnye approach length. 2. 72" Street continues west into the neighborhood allowing for a large walking/ biking area to use this crossing. 1 3. The location of the bridge is just one block north of the proposed location of the Three Rivers Park District Nine Mile Creek Trail location. There is desire to construct a connection between these two facilities. ATTACHMENTS: Edina Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes of May 19, 2011 Edina Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes of June 16, 2011 Draft Edina Transportation Commission Meeting Minutes of July 21, 2011 G: \Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets\Trafflc\Transportatlon Commission \Agendas \2011 R &R to Council \Item VIII.E.ETCfrance.doc wgiNA , MINUTES OF THE Edina Transportation Commission O e Thursday, May 19, 2011 v �y co Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street 1'�� Council Chambers I. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by chair Janovy. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Members Bass, Bonneville, Braden, Franzen, Janovy, Schold Davis, Thompson and McKlveen. III. Approval of Meeting Agenda Motion made by Commissioner Franzen and seconded by Commissioner Schold Davis to approve the agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. IV. Adoption of Consent Agenda Item IV.B., Traffic Safety Report of May 4, 2011 was pulled from the consent agenda. A. Approval of Minutes -- Regular Meeting of April 21, 2011 The following changes were made to the minutes: Item II, 1St sentence: delete "...serves a term of 2 years," and insert "...is eligible to serve two 1 -year terms..." 2nd sentence — delete "...also leads..." and insert "...may also lead..." New 4th para, insert "After closure of the nominations, the Commission took a voice vote and voted to appoint Chair Janovy as Chair and Commissioner Franzen as vice - chair. All voted aye." Page 4, very top, first para, 2nd sentence from top "should look like." 2nd para, 2nd sentence insert "...able to persuade the neighborhood to defeat..." Page 5, Item XII, Commission Comments: Delete "...is hosting a..." and insert "...offered to pay for an attendee to the..." Also delete "...and is paying for one member of the ETC to attend. Commissioner Franzen volunteered to attend." Commissioner Schold Davis motioned to approve the corrected minutes and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Thompson. All voted aye. Motion carried. B. Traffic Safety Report of May 2, 2011 Section C, item 1, request for an all -way (4 -way) stop at the intersection of Tifton Drive and Everett Place. Assistant City Engineer Sullivan said Commissioner Nelson said via email that he anticipates the findings will not warrant a stop sign because this is not a cut -thru area and the grade changes enough to slow drivers. V. Community Comment Chair Janovy said with the new agenda format, the public on specific agenda items. they will be taking comments from members of VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS A. Living Streets Resolution Update Mr. Sullivan said the Council is in favor of the ETC starting the process of developing a Living Streets policy. Moving forward, Mr. Sullivan said funding for the process willl need to be considered. North St. Paul spent $200,000 on their Living Streets process, which involved a fair amount of public input. The Grandview Small Area Study is expected to cost approximately $100,000. He said the State Health Improvement Program (SHIP), administered by Bloomington Public Health Department, has a $15,000 grant set aside for Edina that could be allocated as seed money to start the process; however, it expires in approximately one month. Mr. Sullivan said they need to create a scope to get the money but considering the limited timeframe it does not need to be elaborate. Commissioner Bass said the funding was set aside for policy development in Edina, awaiting the right opportunity. Mr. Sullivan said some of the state's requirements on what the money can be used for are developing a policy framework, paying consultants, and staff time. Discussion ensued as follow: • Staff or a traffic engineer graduate student working on this. • Establish a sub - committee or committee of the whole to work on this (would not count towards attendance) • Hiring a consultant as a facilitator. • Staff would explore what other communities have done and write an RFP for a consultant. • Nine Mile Creek Watershed District was intrigued with the idea of what No. St. Paul did. • The ETC would need to set goals. • No. St. Paul has their Comp Plan incorporated with the Living Streets Policy. • Living Streets document would fit with the city's Comp Plan, be more readily available and useable and serve as public education and include a street that would serve as standard or model. • Should not become an appendix to the Comp Plan; make it an active plan. • W. 70th Street may be an example of what a Living Streets should be when construction is completed. Mr. Sullivan said the immediate next step is to secure the funding from Bloomington, followed by establishing a framework. Commissioner Bonneville challenged everyone to bring a list of goals, scope items, and standards for discussion at the June meeting. B. Transportation Commission Ordinance Update Mr. Sullivan said the proposed ordinance update was presented to the Council, along with a memo from Director Houle outlining his concerns and seeking clarification on some of the language in the purpose and duties regarding timeline implication. Additionally, CM Sprague rewrote the purpose and duties and there is a follow -up memo from Director Houle regarding items 3 and 7 of the original proposed ordinance. Review of CM Sprague's revisions: • Items 2 and 3 F. Chair Janovy said CM Sprague took items 2 and 3 from the April 21 draft and inserted "plans and recommendations" and combined 2 and 3. After discussion, the consensus was that CM Sprague's revision was acceptable, and to address Director Houle's concern, the Engineering process would not be delayed or interrupted. The intent is to have an opportunity to review and offer recommendation before a road reconstruction /improvement goes to Council for final approval. A concern raised was having the ability to offer recommendations but not being able to truly effect changes because of the timeline. Mr. Sullivan said he anticipates presenting preliminary plans to the ETC sometime in November - December, which is approximately two months into the planning phase. Mr. Sullivan said further that staffs concern was interpretation of the ordinance and while the current ETC can reassure of their intent, intent could be interpreted differently in a few years. It was determined that procedural documents could be written to alleviate the concerns. Regarding Director Houle's concern on "Past projects have not included traffic counts..," Mr. Sullivan said requests for traffic counts have increased on many projects and the feeling is that the ETC will ask about stop signs, etc. and traffic counts become necessary to determine warrants. Mr. Sullivan said in some instances, through engineering knowledge and judgment, they can surmise that warrants will not be met and therefore no need to count; however, engineering knowledge and judgment could be overlooked. Chair Janovy said it is the Council that is requesting the data, as in the case of 58th and Chowen Avenue. Item 4 No change. Item 5 Revision is acceptable. Item 6 No change. • Item 7 Chair Janovy said CM Sprague is saying that the TSC report should go to the ETC before going to the Council and CM Brindle expressed concern that the process for the Council approving regulatory signs would be delayed. After discussion, consensus was reached to reword as 'Review and comment on citizens' transportation concerns, traffic complaint reports, and data.' Regarding staffs suggested process, as stated in the memo from Director Houle, chair Janovy said it is different from what the ETC has discussed and would probably be more time consuming for staff. Commissioner Bonneville motioned to accept CM Sprague's revision with modifications to item 7 to say 'Review and comment on citizens' transportation concerns, traffic complaint reports, and data' and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Schold Davis. All voted aye. Motion carried. C. Safe Routes to School Application Mr. Sullivan said the National Safe Routes to School conference is scheduled for 8/16 -18 at the Minneapolis Convention Center, and the Bloomington /Edina /Richfield State Initiative 3 Program (SHIP) is sponsoring members from the BETF and ETC to attend. Commissioner Bass said she will be there as one of the lead organizers for Blue Cross /Blue Shield. Additionally, Mr. Sullivan said the state has appropriated $4.2 million for Safe Routes to School funding and applications are due mid -June. He said they are working to identify preferred sites in the community with the help of one BETF member, chair Janovy, two school district staff and engineering staff, and in their first meeting, Southview, Cornelia, and Creek ValleyNalley View campuses were identified as preferred sites for infrastructure improvements (high schools are not eligible). Improvements can be sidewalks, road realignment, pedestrian activated crossing signals, roundabouts etc. Meeting participants were asked to drive the preferred sites to see what improvements they feel is needed and as part of the application process, the site that receives the highest score would be improved. Mr. Sullivan encouraged the ETC to visit the sites also and provide feedback. He said award could be approximately $200,000. Commissioner Bass said as part of the criteria she would be looking for potential for impact to r_hnnnA hahavinm lPvPl of ci innnrt Pnrni iranPmPnt anti Prh irntinn D. France Avenue Study Mr. Sullivan said CM Sprague asked that the ETC look at France Avenue from TH -494 to crosstown. Handouts given to the ETC for this discussion included: 1. Local Traffic Task Force Findings and Recommendations, May 2003 2. Greater Southdale Area Final Land Use and Transportation Study Report, Dec 2005 3. France Avenue Corridor Study, Apr 2009 4. Federal Transportation Enhancement Funding - 72 "d Street Pedestrian Bridge, Jul 2007. Discussion ensued about the 72nd Street Bridge. Mr. Sullivan said the first reference of the bridge is in the Greater Southdale Study and it was looked at more in -depth with the Promenade. He said federal funding for the bridge has a sunset date of March 31, 2012, and that the City is moving forward with Request for Qualification (RFQ) for a consultant by mid - June. He said required matching funds would come from the TIF district. During discussion the following were shared: the bridge is not in the right location; TIF money can be better spent; there is advantage to the bridge and retrofitting with the roadway; the studies on France Avenue are not connected; do not know enough to make informed decision; inadequate data; trail to the south does not connect; and overbuilding and not serving society. Chair Janovy said since Council has formally asked them to look at France Avenue they will need more information including answers to: Can the scope of the project (bridge over France Avenue that received federal funding) be changed? Can this money be redirected? Did the context sensitive design process take place in 2008 or 2009? E. Bike Edina Task Force Study None. F. Grandview Small Area Study Update Commissioner Nelson reported the following via email: Meeting held May 12, 7 -9 p.m. at Edina Senior Center. The four workgroups updated the group as to their work to date, then a 4 visioning exercise was held for small groups to consider a) what do we want in the District ?, b) is it consistent with the Guiding Principles ?, c) what do we need to make it happen? The four workgroups focus around the areas of: 1) Community Needs and Public Realm; 2) Market Analysis and Finance; 3) Land Use and Community Design; 4) Transportation. The Community Needs group held an open house for the community to provide input on May 10th at the Edina Library. The Market Analysis group is looking to do some housing studies and considering the potential development of a new TIF district. NOTE: the Southdale Area TIF District has approximately $12 million with another $12 million to come in the next 4 years - this money,is required to stay in the TIF district and will be used to make improvements to the area. The Land Use / Community Design discussed a few projects that have made a significant impact in the regions completed. The Chicago Millennium Park project covered a large area of parking and train tracks with green /park space for the community. A publication of early Minneapolis planning was shared with plans to center Minneapolis around the river - those plans were never followed and the City is still working to make the river a focus of the City even today. One of the committee members attended a St. Louis Park meeting regarding the freight rail issue that City is dealing with and reported that 42 homes are being proposed to be demolished with one of the concept plans. The Transportation group has identified several issues w.r.t. transportation and will guide discussion around the area of (1) access to and through the area; (2) future light rail potential and /or access to the proposed SW Transistway line via the existing rail with bus or rail service; (3) biking and walking improvements; (4) reconfiguration of Hwy 100 ramps; (5) automobile traffic; (6) circulator vehicle potential. The visioning exercise provided several interesting concepts and ideas for the area. Commissioner Bonneville was also in attendance and may provide additional comments on this meeting. The future workgroup sessions are set for the 3rd Thursday of the next 4 months (6/16; 7/21; 8/18; 9/15) a concern was raised as to the conflict that Mr. Bonneville and I will have with the ETC meetings held on the same evening. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS None. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Commissioner Bass said they had their first bike /walk to school at Creek Valley on May 5 and 74% participated. IX. STAFF COMMENTS Reminder to contact Mr. Sullivan if interested in attending the Safe Routes to School conference. X. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Braden motioned to adjourn the meeting and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Bonneville. All voted aye. Motion carried. 61 MINUTES OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COMMUNITY ROOM JUNE 16, 2011 6:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by chair Janovy. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members Bass, Bonneville, Braden, Franzen, Janovy, Schold Davis, Thompson and Nelson. III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Chair Janovy proposed to change the meeting agenda to go to Item VI.0 immediately upon Mr. Steve Clark's arrival; Living Streets will include discussion on SHIP funding update, Commissioner Bass' funding update and Commissioner Braden's report on her conversation with a staff from the Humphrey Institute. Commissioner Bonneville asked to add updates on W. 44th St. and Chair Janovy recommended that he sign up for City Extra to receive weekly updates on any project in addition to monthly updates from Mr. Sullivan. Commissioner Franzen moved to approve the amended meeting agenda and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Schold Davis. All voted aye. Motion carried. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA A. Approval of Minutes --Regular meeting of May 19, 2011 B. Traffic Safety Report of June 1, 2011 Regarding Section B, page 2, chair Janovy asked if the City has a written policy on "Child at Play" or similar signs. Assistant city engineer Sullivan said the City does not have a written policy and they are being removed during street reconstruction, or not being replaced when they become worn. She also inquired about "guy with flag" and similar signs and if they can be placed in the parking lane. Mr. Sullivan said staff would prefer that they are not placed in the parking lane and being used short term when children are playing does not present a problem. Commissioner Schold Davis said she has observed the signs in areas where there are no children present and they are placed far out into the street. Commissioner Nelson asked about section D, item 5, where Mr. Tate suggested observation at the curve of Blake Rd around Mirror Lake to see if a slower speed sign should be posted. He said he observed a driver going around the curve at a high speed that went across the street and hit the curb. Mr. Sullivan said he will be looking to see if a lower speed sign should be posted. Commissioner Nelson motioned to approve the consent agenda and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Thompson. All voted aye. Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT None. 1 VI. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS A. Transportation Commission Ordinance Update The ordinance was approved by Council said chair Janovy. B. Living Streets Policy Update Mr. Sullivan said the SHIP funding ($15,000) was approved by the City Council and the next step is to identify a consulting firm that can assist with writing the RFP. Commissioner Bass said Blue Cross is offering a one -day policy development workshop at no cost (a $7,000 value) to the ETC, including elected officials, members from other commissions and the general public. Commissioner Franzen motioned to accept the donation and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Braden. All voted aye. Motion carried. Discussion included: • Commissioner Braden's inquired of the Humphrey Institute if they were working on Living Streets and the person she spoke with expressed a willingness to meet with the ETC. • Workshop consultants could help in determining how to spend the funds (must be used by August 31). • Have consultant attend workshop to see public's reaction. • Use some of the funds for ordinance /policy updates. • RFP to be written by staff and distribute to ETC; staff will also select the consulting firm. C. Bike Boulevards for Transit for Livable Communities (TLC) Mr. Sullivan said the $250,000 grant application that was approved by TLC in 2009 for bike lanes in Edina was discussed at the last Council meeting. He said the bike lanes would start at France Avenue and W. 54th Street (with a connection into Minneapolis), west to Wooddale Avenue to Valley View Road, under crosstown to W. 69th Street and to W. 70th Street. Mr. Sullivan said Council would like a model project but there are some hurdles to work through and asked the ETC to work with TLC regarding the design and for the ETC to engage the public and report back to Council for implementation in 2012. Chair Janovy said the BETF will also weigh -in. She made reference to an anti -bike letter in the Edina Sun - Current and said it shows confusion about where bike belongs. She explained that the concept is largely sharrows and bike may use full lane. She said if she understood correctly, the plan coming forward did not meet intended goals of funding. Mr. Steve Clark, of TLC, said that in a construction approval memorandum to MnDOT, the engineering consulting firm explained that part of the application was not realistic because they probably would not be able to remove parking, and therefore, the plan was have sharrows and use lane signs in those areas. He said the original application submitted in 2008 had some merits but did not quite go far enough. He said TLC worked with city engineer Houle and BETF to bring it to best practices for bicyclists, and the 2009 revision included a willingness to explore bike lanes on both Valley View Road and Wooddale Avenue which would require removal of parking on Wooddale. He said a parking study could be done to determine parking needs on Wooddale, but in his observation, there appear to be driveways and garages that allows for adequate off - street parking. He said if the roadway has at least 2000 cars, it is best to have dedicated bike lanes to remove conflicts and the law allows this. He said on Wooddale, parking would need to be removed, while Valley View would be a road diet going from 3 to 2 lanes. He said in his observation, the center lane did not appear to be used often but this may require an engineer study. He said the 3 to 2 lane conversion was not in writing but there seemed to be a willingness to explore this. He said city of Richfield is narrowing lanes to 10 ft. to accommodate 5 -6 ft. bike lane, and while Mn /Dot does not like this, it is happening more often nationally. 2 Regarding 54th Street, Mr. Clark said there is no need to remove parking, instead he suggested having reverse stop signs to make it easier for bicyclists and add diverters to discourage cars from using it. He said the application does not have much detail for making this street bike friendly. Mr. Clark explained further that most of the money would be spent at Valley View and TH -62 to redesign the area and that a consultant and city engineer Houle have already created a design but this is not necessarily the final solution. Additionally, he said the project is challenging because Edina is not a grid system and the current locations seem to be the most direct routes. Discussion ensued as follows: • 70th St. has roundabouts going in that is not compatible to bikes, even after planning for so long. Mr. Clark said bikes lanes are not recommended for roundabouts, sharrows are better. He said bikes are to use roundabouts just like cars with sharrows and for those not comfortable being in roundabout with cars, install sidewalk and crosswalk. Sharrows are not planned for roundabouts for lack of space according to city engineer Houle and it is too late for ramps. Consider discussion to retrofit the roundabouts at a later time. • 54th, Wooddale, Valley View, 69th are all state aid roads that requires adherence and Edina has never requested a variance for a 10 ft. lane; not know sure if other communities have done this. • What is the consequence for eliminating parking on Wooddale? Mostly used by contractor vehicles now it seem. • Mr. Clark met yesterday with his committee and told them that a resolution supporting the project was coming and he will report to the board that there isn't a motion now to move forward or withdraw funds. • Is the 54th bridge wide enough? Mr. Sullivan said it needs to be replaced but no funding at this time for replacement. • Do not have a way to approach the parking issue; on W. 70th and other projects, parking always wins over bike lanes. How do you determine the value of parking since parking always wins out over everything else? • Council wants this moving forward, engaging with public, resolve parking, etc. ETC would help with engaging residents on issues such as parking. • Residents will feel threatened about losing parking and the City does not have a parking policy; already knows how it will end. • Should be working with a firm that has experience with bike boulevard, etc. Mr. Sullivan said there is no money to pay a firm and they will not hire a firm until the major concerns are identified and worked out. • 40th Street River Lake Bike Blvd is the closest bike boulevard to Edina to see an example of one. • About 90% of the routes are feasible and maybe Mr. Clark can talk with his colleagues to get suggestion for safer solutions. • Need to have conversation at a higher level first before engaging the community; let community know this is not for speeding cyclists but for children and regular cyclists. • People's exposure now is negative and Edina is not ready for cycling. 3 • Bridge over TH -62 could score high for funding. • Mr. Clark said his time is being redirected to other planning studies for projects that are shovel- ready. He said he needs to know if the City is serious and if the community is ready for this type of project. He said the board has other projects with community support but no money; therefore, they are looking at projects without community support to pull money from. He said he does not like removing parking when there aren't off - street parking options and Wooddale has large residential houses with off - street parking options. He said if parking cannot be removed from Wooddale and having 3 years to consider this his recommendation would be to spend the money elsewhere. He said the public process is important to get the community's feedback. • Council direction was not very clear as to what they want ETC to do, getting clarification through the City Manager. Engineer said certain things weren't feasible as indicated in 2009 application; certain sections puts funding in jeopardy and TLC will not accept watered down modification; sharrows do not increase ridership, but bike lanes do; can have some sharrows but they should not be the majority. • Next Tuesday staff is meeting with Council and can outline the concern to see how they want to proceed. Commissioner Thompson motioned that they move forward with pursuing the $250,000 and that they do the best they can in meeting original application and avoid watering it down. Discussion • Need Council's commitment immediately or could lose the money. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Nelson. Discussion • Include in memo to Council that they are aware that parking will be an issue along the route and issue at crosstown intersection and at roundabouts that have not been solved at this time. All voted aye. Motion carried. D. Safe Routes to School Application Update Mr. Sullivan said an application was submitted yesterday and they should know by August if approval was granted for the South View campus for approximately $500,000. E. France Avenue Study Mr. Sullivan explained the following: • Past assistant city manager worked on the plans for the 72nd St. Bridge and he is working to fill in the gaps that exist today; current plan is to do an RFP at this time; Council needs to be brought up -to -date. • 2007 concept plan included two bridges — one at 691h St. to connect with proposed trail but the trail is crossing at the Galleria instead at grade level. • Original estimated cost was $23M but it could now be $3.5M and the original design was for access to the neighborhoods, not to connect with the trail. • At -grade crossing was suggested with bikers walking their bike across. • TIF money may not be available. Motion by Commissioner Nelson to not support the bridge at the current location and to support significant enhancement improvements to facilitate at -grade crossing and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Bass. All voted aye. Motion carried. 4 Discussion France Avenue Study was commissioned by the City and Hennepin County's Housing, Community Works and Transit Department. It is not known whether it has the support of Hennepin County Transportation or Public Works Departments. F. Bike Edina Task Force Update None 1s G. Grandview Small Area Study Update There is a transportation subcommittee that Commissioners Bonneville and Nelson serves on; however, the rest of their meeting dates conflicts with the meeting dates of the ETC. H. ETC Bylaws After brief discussion, Commissioner Thompson motion to accept what is in the packet and revisiting by year's end and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Bonneville. All voted aye. Motion carried. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS None. VIII. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Commissioner Bonneville requested monthly updates on W. 44th Street and W. 70th Street. IX. STAFF COMMENTS Mr. Sullivan said on W. 701h Street curbs for the roundabouts at the east end will be poured this week and the 24" gas main will be complete by the end of the month; regarding W. 44th, the contractor's meeting just took place and the gas company should be starting within 10 days. Sanitary sewer lift at 42nd has a foul smell, said chair Janovy. X. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Franzen moved to adjourn the meeting and the motion was seconded by Commissioner Braden. All voted aye. Motion passed. MINUTES OF CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION COUNCIL CHAMBERS JULY 21, 2011 6:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bass, Bonneville, Braden, Frazen, Janovy, McKleven, Nelson, Scheerer, Thompson and Schold Davis APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Motion was made by Member Franzen and seconded by Member Braden approving the meeting agenda. All voted aye. Motion carried. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Motion was made by Member Braden and seconded by Member Franzen approving the consent agenda with the exception of Item W.A., approval of minutes, regular meeting of June 16, 2011. All voted aye. Motion carried. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - REGULAR MEETING OF JUNE 16, 2011 The minutes were amended as follow: Page 1, item III, strike "Chair Janovy moved for a change on" and replace with "Chair Janovy proposed to change..." Add "amended" to "Commissioner Franzen moved to approve the amended meeting agenda..." Page 2, item C., strike "did not do enough, for biking" and replace with "did not meet intended goals of funding." Top of page 5 strike "France Avenue Study was done for Active Living in Hennepin County, but the study was not done by Hennepin County and does not necessarily have their support" and replace with "France Avenue Study was commissioned by the .City and Hennepin County's Housing, Community Works and Transit Department. It is not known whether it has the'support of Hennepin County Transportation or Public Works Departments." Motion was made. by Member Braden and seconded by Member Franzen to approve amended minutes. All voted aye. Motion carried. COMMUNITY COMMENT None. TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS FOR SENIORS Presentation by Elin Schold Davis Population age 65 and older will grow more than 2% annually from 2001 to 2009 and another 60% over the next 15 years; therefore, needing multi -modal solutions. As the ETC think about Complete Streets, they need to think about the abilities of residents in the community and transportation options including physical, vision, cognition and level of assistance. Living Streets is a great start that most communities are adopting; however, nationally, less than one -third addresses the needs of older users. Member Schold Davis said she would like Edina to address the needs of its diverse population. Continuing, she said the five A's of senior friendly transportation that realtors and others may begin using to score communities are: 1) Availability; 2) Acceptability; 3) Accessibility; 4) Adaptability; and 5) Affordability and she recommended that the ETC use these as measuring tools. HUMAN SERVICES TASK FORCE A request was made for a volunteer to serve on this task force to make recommendation how the City should spend its human services funds. Member Braden volunteered and Member Schold Davis volunteered to be her back -up. COMMISSION DISCUSSION Format for forwarding recommendations to the Council Chair Janovy said at the last meeting two recommendations were made to the Council that have not yet been submitted because there is not a proper way to do so currently and she asked for suggestions. Members Braden and McKlveen each suggested a format. TLC Grant Update Assistant city engineer Sullivan said the BETF has a workshop scheduled for August 3 with the City Council and Manager Neal and this topic will be discussed. He anticipates drafting a formal response to the TLC following the meeting. Discussion ensued regarding the 3 -to -2 lane conversion on Valley View Road; Director Houle, consultant (WSB) and TLC working together to develop a plan for the 8/3 meeting; whether or not residents on Wooddale were surveyed; and building ramps parallel to crosstown to avoid the Valley View intersection. Motion was made by Member McKleven and seconded by Member Thompson to recommit their support of the project to secure the TLC grant and to endorse the 3 -to -2 lane conversion on Valley View Road. All voted aye. Motion carried. Assistant city engineer Sullivan said the ETC's recommendation to Council was to support significant enhancement of at grade crossing along France Avenue from crosstown to TH -494 and "not support the bridge. He said staff is moving forward with the RFP to secure funding of the bridge. During discussion, it was noted that the cost of the bridge is approximately $3 -5M with $1.5M in federal grant and the rest would come from TIF funds. Staff was asked why they were continuing to support the bridge. Mr. Sullivan said when the application was done, there were strong support for the bridge, especially during the W. 70th Street (France to TH. 100) planning. He said at that time, current plans by Three Rivers District was not known but it does not mean that modifications cannot be made to align the bridge with their plan. Motion was made, by Member Bonneville and seconded by Member Nelson that the ETC reiterate their prior recommendation that the bridge not be built for lack of information and high cost; lack of public input; not knowing connectivity; will not serve users on France Avenue; lack of justification; not warranted for usage; and not judicious, efficient use of public dollars. Rollcall: Ayes: Bass, Bonneville, Braden, Nelson, Janovy, Schold Davis Nays: Franzen, Thompson Motion carried. Assistant city engineer Sullivan said at the last Council meeting questions were raised regarding the meaning of "road closed to thru traffic" and "road closed' signs at the W. 44th and W. 70`h Streets reconstruction projects. He said both streets are heavily used and are currently detoured for reconstruction. He said "road closed to thru traffic" sign means that if you are not a resident on that street or visiting a business, you should not be using that street; and "road closed" means there is activity going on that will prevent you from getting thru, even for residents on that street. Accessing north /south streets by crossing a closed street is not allowed. Mr. Sullivan said these areas are generally patrolled by the police. Temporary Installation of speed table was authorized by Council on Sunnyside Road, east of Townes Road, due to drivers not using the detour as directed and the goal is to readjust drivers' behavior. Currently, there is not policy in place foi the use of speed table; one will need to be developed. 2 Living Streets RFP update Staff is finalizing the RFP and members have recommended some firms to receive it. Bike Edina Task Force Update Chair Johnson has stepped down and the leadership is shared with co- chairs Peter Kelly and Brad Chappey. Discussion took place regarding the structure of the BETF and if it would like to remain independent, become a committee of the ETC, or be its own board or commission and this came up because the ETC bylaw does allow for a committee. Grandview Small Area Study Update Member Nelson said they have not been able to attend the meeting as the schedule is the same as the ETC; however a letter of interest were issued to select a consultant to assist in the process and they are reviewing those letters tonight. 44th and 70th Street Updates W. 44th was discussed earlier and is progressing; phase 1 of W. 701h 'Street was paved yesterday and the goal is to open this phase before school begins. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS None CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS Member Nelson asked if there is a plan for reconstructing concrete streets. Mr. Sullivan said most of the concrete streets still have some time to before needing to be replaced and they are also much more expensive than asphalt. He said they are putting together a plan for concrete street replacement. Member Franzen said the presentation on transportation options for seniors was intriguing and warrant more discussion and perhaps subcommittee to do more research. Member Schold Davis said she would be happy'to help with a,subcommittee. She said there are some counties that are starting the discussion that they could probably become involved with. Member Bonneville said they should look at the intersection at Interlachen Blvd where it crosses Vernon by the gas station because it is 'a difficult intersection. He said perhaps the ETC can lend some support to the small area planning group to look at'it. Member Bass gave the following update oh�the state's budget as provided by a TLC staff: commuter and passenger rail routes remained uncut; transit fares are expected to remain the same; metro area transit service to remain intact; may be slight reduction in a few cities and suburban routes; federal contribution expected to be reduced; MetCouncil received $20M in state bonds to conduct'additional studies on new corridors; bicycle and pedestrian trails were included in a $500M bonding bill; Complete Streets legislation remain intact; and the budget for roads and transportation increased. Member Thompson said he received an email from Lynette that was sent by a resident on Pointe Dr. regarding the number of garbage trucks on his street and why the City did not have just one hauler. Chair Janovy said she referred him to the chair of the Energy and Environment Commission. STAFF COMMENTS None. ADJOURNMENT Motion was made Member Bass and seconded by Member Braden to adjourn. All voted aye. Motion carried. 3 ow U) • rN�RPbFi!`��O • �eee REPORT/RECOMMEN ®ATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item. IX. DEBRA MANGEN Action From: CITY CLERK Discussion ® Information Date: AUGUST 3, 2011- Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received since the last Council meeting. q TCE ED J 2011 Amy Gustafson 8210 Hill Trail N Lake Elmo MN 55042 Wayne Houle. City Engineer and Directory of Public Works Edina Public Works ,& Park Maintenance Facility 7450 Metro Blvd. Edina MN 55439 . July 28, 2011 Dear Mr. Houle, am writing to request that the parking ramp at the intersection of 50th Street 'and France Avenue be outfitted with clear signs to stipulate the parking restrictions therein, recently was cited for parking over the 2 hour limit posted on a pillar several parking spots away from where I parked. I have never parked in a 'free" parking ramp where there was a time restriction on parking, so I didn't notice the "2 hour parking limit" sign. Also, I didn't see any signs as I entered the ramp indicating that there were restrictions. Of course, I avoided handicapped - accessible spots, as there is a sign at every one of those spots. However, there is not a sign at every spot that is time restricted. I think all that would need to be done is to add a gate and a large sign at the entrance which states that there are parking restrictions, and which level is restricted to which time limits, just as pay parking lots indicate which is reserved, overnight, hourly parking, etc. Adding a gate would help people take notice, not just of the unusual parking restrictions in the free" ramp, but also the many inattentive people, cars and baby carts' going by. Chains or cables could be pat'between the -pillars with signs at each spot stating the limits, and /or signs should indicate that the limit is for the entire .level, for instance "2 hour limit this level ". The citation makes me want to avoid spending money in Edina in particular, as well as in Hennepin County as, even though 1 have worked there for six years running. Anyone can buy gas, goods and entertainment in neighboring areas instead that would quickly and easily more than make up, in tax revenue, for the $,42.00 parking ramp citation fee. Please do something to change this. Thank you, Amy Gustaf n cc: . James B. Hovland, Mayor, City of Edina Hennepin County Court House, Division 1 District Court Susan Howl JUL 2 8 2011 From: Suzanne Kerwin [mailto:skerwin @comcast.net] Sent: Friday, July 29, 20118:49 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: League of Women Voters -Edina invites you to hear International Speakers in September To members of the City Council and the City Manager- Two headline grabbing international topics and two dynamic, seasoned speakers to present at our unit meetings in September. Both meetings start at 9:45a1n and the public is invited to attend. Thursday, September 8th, Edina Grandview Library Iran and the aftermath of the June 2009 Elections Dr. William O. Beeman, Professor and Chair of the Anthropology Dept. at the University of MN, will speak on the aftermath of the June 12, 2009 Iran Elections. He will also address the clashes between police and protesters in the Persian Gulf countries such as Bahrain. Professor Beeman lived in Iran for 10 years and speaks fluent Farsi. He speaks with personal knowledge and an understanding of the complexity of the region. Saturday, September 10, Edina City Hall Tunisia, Egypt and Libya Dr. Imed Labidi, Scholar of international media and cultural studies who currently lectures for the Dept. of Cultural Studies and Comparative Literature at the University of MN. He is from Tunisia, and is presently there doing research. His topic will take a comparative approach to the uprisings in the countries of Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya. Since what has become to be known as the Arab Spring has turned into the Arab Summer; by autumn, Dr. Labidi will certainly captivate our interest. The League of Women Voters of Edina is a non - partisan political organization that encourages the informed and active participation in government, and influences public policy through education and advocacy. For more information, please visit www.lwvedina.org. Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 8:46 AM Cc: Susan Howl �� UVE Subject: FAN: Edina Sports Complex Dome JUL 2 6 2011 Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno @ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Marc Gould [mailto:marcdgould @gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, July 28, 20115:10 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Edina Sports Complex Dome I am strongly in favor of this idea. Thanks for listening, Marc Gould Edina Resident 1 V'rn mo rV 3r HUGER V " JMS Custom Homes, LLC JUL 2 7 2011 "The sensi6Ce way to 6uikC' - -- -- - - -a- July 21, 2011 City of Edina % Cary Teague, Director of Planning 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 RE: URBAN LIVING (Bishop's Walk) Dear Cary, As we look forward to the 21St Century it may be beneficial to look back. In the late 1960's and 1970's as I grew up in Edina there was a school called Wooddale, a grocery store on the North side of France called Lund's and a cool toy land called Clancy's (now D'Amico). As we look forward equal distance to the past described above, I am confident that the changes of the last 30 – 40 years will accelerate. As life styles evolve so do housing types and options for our communities' residents ever changing needs. Acknowledgement of these continuous evolutions concludes that by 2040 – 2050 homes and home styles will be different than they were 80 years prior. Please take a moment to consider the enclosed article about new homes in mature communities. would love to hear from any of you whom have a desire to discuss these concepts. Respectfully, erol� wtg�— Jeffrey M. Schoenwetter, CEO JMS CUSTOM HOMES, LLC JMS /dt Enclosure Cc: Edina City Council Edina City Planning 5250 West 74th Street - Suite 8, Edina, MN 55439 - 952 - 949 -3630 [TOWNHOMES /URBAN HOMES] O The House Review design team presents five cutting -edge plans for urban, townhouse living. By Larry W. Garnett, FAIBD, House Review Lead Designer W e continue to hear about the increasing popularity of urban living. It seems that many young professionals and empty- nesters appreciate the cone- - nience of living in a place where they can walk to most destinations, have access to public transportation, and enjoy a variety of gultural attractions. Although each city and town offers a variety of both incentives and challenges when building in urban settings, the opportunities certainly seem to be increasing. Creating appropriate designs for urban housing can also be a challenge. In fact, it's difficult to arrive at a concise definition for an "urban home:' After all, available sites in most cities range from narrow single - family lots to properties where attached units make more sense. However, the common elements that seem most critical are building homes that maintain a sense of identity in the existing neighborhood while also offering a sense of privacy and security. month, our design team offers several examples of urban homes, each addressing these impor, elements. While the recurring theme seems -to be the use of courtyards, the house structures range from simple traditional forms to more elaborate luxury homes. Each designer has provided thought- ful and often flexible solutions that can be adapted to fit the context of virtually any urban site. For more information on these plans and to view additional designs, including previous House Review reports, visit v ww.HousingZone.com/HouseReview. r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 L - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 18 Professional Builder May 2011 16TH STREET - ainino and a sma||�it�6on�ar6en. / _'~ . ~ Finally, it's the attention to detail that transforms any house into aunique / home. Inside, note the thickened walls, columns, and openings between the / dining, family, and kitchen areas. It's quite amazing how much more substan- tial thehomeseemswhenwa|kingt6rnugha1O'inch-thickopeningintho � wall. The exterior utilizes a simple combination of natural stone and stucco. / However, notice the stone detail at the window and porch openings and / the use / / SECOND FLOOR important to the overall appeal of the exterior design. / / ---------------------------------------------------------------------' Professional opauer 19 / DESIGNER / / Larry W. Garnett, FAIBD / / � . . / ��� . . Er X / ` A. / First floor: 775 sf / � V V11 / / / . . . Width: 22 feet (trame) . / W _ B / / MASTE� 11="OM . / . . / D DESIGNER'S ESSAY / / High-density sites often require designs with a great deal offlexibility. ' / This design allows either a single home to be constructed on a narrow lot / / o ora group of homes built side 6y side as duplexes ortownhomes. / / The idea of sharing spaces within a home is nothing new. We've been / � combining kitchens and family rooms quite successfully for years now. / Here, the front entry utilizes this same concept 6y sharing the space, de- voted tothediningmoman6the,taircase.Eac6aveaseems|arger,an6 . the dining area can easily expand into the entry when needed. / Although the kitchen and family area share valuable space, the kitchen is / defined 6y the use of simple S6eetvock"coiumns.^ The "resource center" / ` i isanexten,ionof the kitchen, using o column to define a functional work- / space, complete with a com p uter, desk, and file drawers. / / Outdoor spaces become absolutely essential in smaller homes. Here, / t FIRST FLOOR s the covered porch and courtyard become extensions of the indoor living / soace o,ovi6ino a o|aca for ente� - _'~ . ~ Finally, it's the attention to detail that transforms any house into aunique / home. Inside, note the thickened walls, columns, and openings between the / dining, family, and kitchen areas. It's quite amazing how much more substan- tial thehomeseemswhenwa|kingt6rnugha1O'inch-thickopeningintho � wall. The exterior utilizes a simple combination of natural stone and stucco. / However, notice the stone detail at the window and porch openings and / the use / / SECOND FLOOR important to the overall appeal of the exterior design. / / ---------------------------------------------------------------------' Professional opauer 19 [TOWNHOMES /URBAN HOMES] r — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 CLAIRMONT 1 I ARCHITECT ' Dominick Tringali Architects jamieq@dtarchitects.com ' 248.335.8888 I www.dtarchitects.com /probuilder t PLAN SIZE 1 First floor: 1,067sf r 1 t I Second floor: 1,021 sf t Lower level: 475 sf GARAGE I Width: 25 feet, 7 inches 4ti+ l 2Dx20 i 1 Depth: 62 feet, 9 inches _ I ouR, MASTER SUITE ARCHITECT'S ESSAY p; 17X14 ' ' The Clairmont Ian is a contemporary home designed with a fo- 1 p p iY 9 FAMILY PORCH d wic I cus on Generation Y buyers. The floor plan is designed for busy life- ' styles, with an emphasis on outdoor living and at -home entertain- ing. The spaces within the home are open and flexible, designed. _ L M. BAT ' with technology, convenience, and entertainment in mind. Upstairs, l DINING e. :14X1, I.-C LOthe plan features two bedrooms and an optional loft bedroom for couR1,AR buyers who enjoy urban, loft -style living. J i , KITCHEN ` ^. The elevation has Craftsman-style architectural features, with a ` , ,4x,s� r, ' ty &4TH i --, ' contemporary twist that appeals to Gen -Y buyers. ' LI BR%R I A major selling point of the home is the side courtyard, which adds - ' to the overall living space without increasing the square footage. The F.�" 1 , c , BEDRM 2 1 R courtyard is also visible from all rooms inside the home, making it a ' great entertainment area with indoor /outdoor interaction..; ` Pow+ ' l�i't� a L�•� -'� ��vj � �� t� +' � ,',�, r� 7�W�i �- �II;_�`;r�'''^, ` I ��, ra � � STORAGE MEMO MEDIA ' ROOM �1= T Y. I ' 1 I I 1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 20 Professional Builder May 2011 [TOWNHOMES /URBAN HOMES] STATE STREET ARCHITECT RPGA Design Group, Inc. Rick Garza 817.332.9477 rickgarza @rpgaarchitects.com www.rpgaarchitects.com PLAN SIZE Ground floor: 1,041 sf Second floor: 980 sf Third floor: 335 sf Garage floor: 158 sf Garage: 454 sf. Porch /Patio: 86 sf 22 Professional Builder May 2011 Terrace: 391 -- ' Width: 22 feet I Depth: 50 feet ' - >$= c sQz ' 2 CAR T.V./ "'� BT ROOM HOOF TERRACE LI8%RY BROOM 2 �Y RM.' irgeu 1 1 1 ARCHITECT'S ESSAY i Simply stated, designing single - family, attached dwellings in an urban setting is still designing single- family homes, but the design typically clusters and attaches several homes KIf Tom together, creating one or multiple buildings with shared ® M'vA.T� ° 1 I 1 i green space, amenities, and drives. FOYER State Street is one such development. It was created by i � � ; ; � � I�^ ,'. t• I designing and grouping three and four townhome units L - -- L ----------- J siy;wc I together and pushing them outward to the property line MASTER to create an urban pedestrian streetscape. Breaking the ' 1 development into multiple buildings allows for pedestrian' ' ' "cut - throughs" to the inner core, which is comprised of ' GARAGE LEVEL 3RD FLOOR 2NO FLOOR ENTRY LEVEL I I more buildings and amenities. I 1 i The individual townhomes are designed to accommodate WORTHINGTON STREET I everything a typical single-family home offers. State Street is I i comprised of four -story buildings that house a garage, utility f E A I� HGt >2 „ M , E ' 1 ,room . elevator, and storage_on the ground floor, mam iving ";E �;. .tl . E D ) ' spaces, suc as foyer, dining room, kitchen, powder room, a 27 and family room, on the second floor, two bedrooms, a mas- I ter bedroom, and two bathrooms on the third floor; and an I A I office and roof terrace .overlooking the city on the top floor. dt Y The exterior of the buildings are designed to make a gesture toward the older neighborhood in which they are ZZ 24 ' being built and are full masonry with careful attention to de- ,.� E - 1 tailing and w' ow size and placement: Overall, this design approach yields a handsome, high-density pedestrian urban I setting of homes that cater to families, professionals, and ' empty nesters alike. The development includes four unit °' `' CONC I types, which appeal to a greater audience, r ' -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - sOLLSTRE I 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - j 22 Professional Builder May 2011 [TDWNHOMES/ URBAN HOMES] -------------------------------------------------------- / .'---- .'-- / / / / / ARCHITECT / / Brown Design Studio / / Eric Brown / / 843.986.9610 / / / / / / / / / / floor: / / / / Depth: 58 feet / / / / ARCHITECT'S ESSAY / Townhouses are unique product types � and should 6e strategically positioned ' / and designed a, unique unita�O�en' / / / / dmes,we,eounhsdevigne6so|e|yas / / price-point units, which leaves a lot of / value on the table. Value building i,done vi 6 i efficient / / techniques, and proper context for the . / / seunh=should cover / / -----�' market entry � ^~~~~ ' / |eve|to the luxury market. / / TheTH3U58isa great mid-market flex- ib|ep|an. It works asa single-family unit, / / a courtyard unit, a duplex, o,atraditional / / multi-unit mwhouse with little change ' / tu the core. |t offers easy adaptability to / treatments / regional styles and materials readily. / / The plan includes a well-appointed ma* ' ' tep6ownconfiguetion'whichaUowot6e / / unit to6eanaginQ-in'p|aoe dwelling (rear / / ramp is easily a66e6), but it still lives front / / to back, which is key for attached units. / / In addition, the plan is efficient in use of / / space and basic construction techniques. ' ^--------------------------------------------------------------------^ 24 Professional Builder May 201.1 [TOWNHOMES /URBAN HOMES] ARCHITECT Dominick Tringali Architects I i jamieq@dtarchitects.com 248.335.8888 www.dtarchitects.com/probu i I der PLAN SIZE ' First floor: 1,507 sf I I Second floor: 1,378 sf ' Lower level: 826 sf I Width: 26 feet ' Depth: 64 feet, 5 inches I ' ARCHITECT'S ESSAY The Pennmore plan is designed for a buyer seeking urban, loft-style I living. The elevation features a ' traditional design with a contem- porary twist and plenty of outdoor ' living and entertainment space. i I The extended front porch wel- comes guests into the home and is conducive to entertaining. The ' exterior courtyard in the rear of 1 the home features a fireplace and private entertaining area. I Inside the home, the open, inte- grated kitchen /nook/living area on the first floor enables the homeown- ers to entertain guests while still I having a cozy space to enjoy alone. The focus of the second floor is an I overstated master suite, with walk -in closets and an innovative master bath. The homeowners can con - veniently access the office /reading I area adjacent to the master suite. With conservation of square footaqe in mind, the garage was desiqned to fit underneath the first floor, adjacent to the lower level space. 26 Professional Builder May 2011 FIRST FLOOR PLAN MASTER a UrTE SECOND FLOOR PLAN 21 I 1 I I I I 1 I i I I 1 . 1 I I I I I I I I s I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I rn RECEWED JUL 2 7 2011 July 21, 2011 Mayor Jim Hovland and Edina City Council Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Honorable Mayor Jim Hovland and City Council Members: I will not seek re- appointment for another three -year term to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed Board. I would like to take this time to thank you for your support for these past five terms or 15 years. It's been a privilege for me to serve on behalf of Edina and hope I have served well for the city and the other five communities of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Again, I want to thank you for your endorsements for me to the Hennepin County Commissioners these past 15 years. Sincerely, .I t Robert J. Kojetin 5016 William Avenue • Edina, Minnesota 55436.952- 929 -8889 C H R I S T PRESBYTERIAN Inspiring all generations to follow Jesus, love others, and live missionally. CHURCH JUL 2 ?W'i July 21, 2011 City Council of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor and Members of the Council: Thank you for taking time to solicit feedback regarding the multiple- income option for housing on the Colonial Church proposed site. I want to encourage you allow the proposal, adding mixed income housing to the proposal. This community has been blessed on so many levels, and we ought to be in the vanguard of reaching out to those less fortunate than our norm. Additionally, the diversity we might gain from expanding our circle would benefit the entire community, sensitizing us to the larger dynamics our state faces. As the proposal has been scaled back, there certainly can be no significant sense in which we would be changing the overall dynamic within the neighborhood or community. I will support you in the months to come as you weigh these decisions about the fabric of our life together, and the values which undergird its composition. Know that I will be praying, on behalf of the people of Christ Presbyterian, for your wisdom, courage and discernment. Sincerely, Dr. John Crosby Senior Pastor, Christ Presbyterian IECEivE[� JUL 21 2011 Susan Howl To the Edina City Council: I live on Sherwood Avenue, just up the street from Kuhlman Field. In 2002 -2003 it was proposed to have the dome at Kuhlman Field. As for the neighborhood we STRONGLY disagreed because of the increase of traffic and parking issues in our area. We already have a huge parking /traffic issues since the new gyms were put in. I do believe a dome would be great and I did think Braemar would be a great location. I know that the ESC had huge issues with the lost of fields, however, It just makes sense with the ice arena, baseball fields, etc are all at that location that a dome would fit in that location. There is no residential area that the increase of traffic would effect and there is plenty of parking in that area. I don't know the other locations you are looking at but we (our Edina Community Center Neighborhood) are hoping that Kuhlman Field is not on the radar for this. As I remember, it was also going to be a huge cost to the taxpayers of Edina. If Kuhlman Field is being looked at, we would like to have discussions with the City Council and bring are information on why it would not work, for the last go around. Thank you, Lynne Rectenwald 952 - 212 -4326 Hello to all of you, Just to bring you up to date, a "work session" was held at Edina City Hall last Tuesday to discuss the issues relative to building a dome in Edina. The developer presented its dome proposal, and the City Council had the opportunity to acquire information it deemed necessary as part of the deliberative process. Seven representatives from ESC attended, including me. I am pleased to report that the Edina City Council has been receiving letters and emails from the public in favor of a dome, and it has taken notice. It is also apparent that the City would like to consider all site options on the table (not just Braemar North) and get the Edina Park Board and City Staff involved in doing the background and research, bringing recommendations back to the Council. All things considered, the City will likely give a dome in Edina serious consideration. It remains clear that a dome project is not likely to come to fruition without a convincing groundswell of public support. Many hurdles have yet to be cleared. Nearly 775 soccer players call ESC their home for traveling soccer. There is strength in that number, if we all do our part. We will keep our membership apprised of any new developments regarding a dome. If we all stand idly by and do nothing, but hope the tasks ahead will be done by others, it is likely we will continue driving to Richfield, Minnetonka, and Minneapolis for winter training in the years to come. We will let you know when we need to voice our support again in the future. Stay tuned for further updates. Kind regards, Brent Rundquist President of Edina Soccer Club Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2011 8:23 AM Cc: Susan Howl p� Subject: FW: Edina Indoor Turf Facility 7CE ' V E UL 2 7 2011 ' Lynette-Biunno, Receptionist f E?i ti =� 952 - 927 -8861 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 i Ibiunno0ci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ' F or Living, Learning, RLai±ing Families & Doing Business From: mweingartner @metlife.com [ mailto :mweingartner @metlife.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 20118:56 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Edina Indoor Turf Facility Count me as another Edina resident that supports the Indoor Turf facility, thank you for your help, thank you! Mark Weingartner Senior Account Executive Registered Representative 1650 W. 82nd Street Suite 250 Bloomington, MN 55431 Office Phone: 952 - 948 -5830 Cell: 312- 771 -9580. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (MLIC) New York, NY 10166 Securities offered by:MetLife Securities, Inc. (MSI)(FINRA /SIPC). MLIC and MSI are affiliates. The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is for the intended addressee only. Any unauthorized use, dissemination of the information; or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the intended addressee, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message. i Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 10:43 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Edina Needs an Indoor Recreation Facility RECEP V pppp E® JUL 2 6 2011 Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 1: 952-927-8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 IbiunnotcDci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Grove, Mary [mailto:Mary.Grove @elavon.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2011 10:29 AM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: Grove, Mary Subject: Edina Needs an Indoor Recreation Facility We moved to Edina two years ago from Atlanta, GA and were surprised to find that such an affluent community is behind all other surrounding communities. When it comes to sports and year round sporting opportunities, Edina is overshadowed by communities such as Eden Prairie and Minnetonka. An indoor facility will keep people of all ages moving and active during the cold and brutal winter months. It will promote year round sporting opportunities for baseball, soccer, lacrosse, track, golf, and softball. As it is, these sports can only be played 4 -5 months of the year. All sports will benefit from an indoor facility. All ages will benefit from such a facility and it can be used by multiple groups or teams at all times of the day. Our boys play baseball, and each year they pay high participation fees just to stay active, because we they have to rent dome time in Eden Prairie and Minnetonka. I say we build our own facility and stop supporting other communities. We are all for this and hope that Edina moves forward with this great opportunity. Best, Michael and Mary Grove Edina residents The information contained in this e -mail and in any attachments is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and /or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. This message has been scanned for known computer viruses. Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 3:11 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Indoor Turf/Dome RECEIVED JUL 2 6 2011 Lynette Biunno, Receptionist ` 952-927-88611 Fax 9527826 -0389 Ibiunno(fti.edina.mn us'I www.CitvofEdina . com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: djcjnelson [mailto:djcjnelson @comcast:net] Sent: Monday, July 25, 20113:04 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Indoor Turf /Dome Dear Mayor James Hovland and Council Members, Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague and Ann Swenson — I reside in Edina and l am incomplete support of the dome proposal. Please move forward with this long overdue project! Thank you, Janet Nelson 5524 Chantrey Road Edina, MN 55436 1 s: Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Monday, July 25, 2011 10:12 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: New Dome for Edina Athletics RRECE, N ED JUL 2 5 `4 Lynette Biunno, Receptionist L 952-927-8861 1 Fax 952-826-0389 IbiunnoOcLedina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families Sr. Doing Business From: rkgtstrand@q.com [mailto:rkgtstrand@q.com] Sent: Monday, July 25, 20118:39 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: New Dome for Edina Athletics Please direct this to the Mayor and City Council members. I am the parent of an Edina youth who may never get to utilize a proposed dome, however I do support one in spite of that. In the past my son has played with the Edina Soccer Club, but has decided to not play in the future, but to pursue othe activities instead. In spite of this we as a family see the need for a Dome facility in Edina. We do not feel it can be developed though at the expensive of other Edina playing fileds. Edina is sorely lacking in field space as it is compared to many other communties and can not afford to give up any more. The dome needs to be accomplished with no net loss of field space. Again, we support adding a dome, but not by subtracting from the other field space. Thank you for you efforts on this measure. George Strand Susan Howl From: Jordan Gilgenbach Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 2:29 PM To: Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland: Joni Bennett; Josh Sprague; Mary Brindle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Domed facility uun %0ieumr=�w � __ JUL 2.2 2011 20 _ Jordan Gilgenbach, Communications Coordinator 952 - 826 -0396 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 i Cell 612- 363 -3564 `.._ >I IgilgenbacFiCDci.edina.mn.us l www.CityofEdina.com ,.. ,,. ...For Living,' L earning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: spuerzer [mailto:spuerzer @comcast.net] Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 12:58 PM To: Jordan Gilgenbach Subject: Domed facility Please direct this email to: Mayor James Hovland and Council Members: Joni. Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague and Ann Swenson. I fully support an indoor dome facility in Edina but.do not support it being at the current soccer fields at Braemar. We should_,not lose great soccer fields to make this worthwhile project happen. Please find another viable option for the domed facility that results in EXTRA space for sports activity not one that has us lose current field space. Thank you for your consideration. Sue Puerzer Edina resident 1 Susan Howl From: Jordan Gilgenbach 2 Sent: Friday, July 22, 2011 10:43 AM lc ' �p r� E 0 V IE To: Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Joni Bennett; Josh Sprague; Mary Brindle Cc: Susan,Howl JUL 2 2 �rv11 Subject: FW: indoor turf field /rec facility Jordan Gilgenbach, Communications Coordinator 952 - 826 -0396 1 Fax 952- 826 -03891 Cell 612- 363 -3564 igilgenbach @ci.edina.mn.us I www:CityofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & .Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Cathy Ostlie [mailto:costliecopy @earthlink.net] Sent: Thursday, July 21, 20119:54 PM To: Jordan Gilgenbach Subject: indoor turf field /rec facility Dear. Representatives, I am writing to express my support for an indoor turf field, in Edina. As a parent of three teenage boys who have played football, baseball, hockey and lacrosse, I, can attest that every team-they've played on would have'been positively impacted by the availability of an indoor field. This winter /spring has`been horrible for,spring sports. Our son's lacrosse team played 3 weekends in a row in snow, sleet and driving rain: These',games were not ncel i. because they were ' scheduled on turf fields, though Edina regularly closesthe =parks for practices and games due to wet fields. Other cities have thriving rec centers with restaurants, coffee shops, watermarks, racquetball courts, gyms, ice rinks, and senior centers all under one roof. And while keeping up with the Chaska's is no reason to build a rec center, these centers seem to be highly used facilities and become hubs for the communities they're in. I would add that the best ones have some sort of concession /food /restaurant area where:, parents can sit to wait for their kids and spend money instead of sitting in their idling cars in the parking lot. Throw in free Wi Fi and you won't be able to keep them away. This project.is long overdue and I recommend that you support it. Cathy Ostlie 4210 Branson Street Edina, MN 55424. 1 Susan Howl From: Jordan Gilgenbach Sent: Friday, July 22,.2011 10:40 AM To: Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Joni Bennett; Josh Sprague; Mary Brindle Cc: Susan Howl, R EC E V E D, ' Subject: FW: Indoor turf and recreation area for Edina V JUL 2 2 2011 -` Jordan Gilgenbach,, Communications Coordinator --------------- 952 - 826 -0396 1 Fax 952 - 826 -03891 Cell 612 - 363 -3564 r�+ ti F ; - it enbach c ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com .,. ...For Living, Learning, Raising families & Doing Business From: dhopfner @isd.net [mailto:dhopfner @ isd.net] Sent: Thursday, July 21; 20115:54 PM To: Jordan Gilgenbach Subject: Indoor turf and recreation area for Edina Hello, As an Edina family with children who have played various sports on our communities playing fields and arenas for the last sixteen years, we totally support the idea of creating a,domed turf and rec area in our city. Such a facility would not only benefit our young athletes but also many other community and school based organizations and individuals. An indoor recreation area that could be used year round would be a tremendous asset to our community. Please seriously consider lending your full support behind this proposed project that has great potential to strengthen our community even more. Thankyou! Doug and Susan Hopfner i Susan Howl Mr. Keprios: Now some chickens are roosting. JUL 2 1 2011 For the many of us who play golf at venues around the metro, we know that Braemar is experiencing difficulty not just because of lousy weather and slack golf demand but because of its lingering reputation for poor quality greens. You supported John Vallierie when he purposely maintained mediocre greens because as a nongolfer he held a distorted view of what "quality greens" are. He regularly lied (yes LIED) to us that he was doing "all he can." But through John's own words (in the Sun Current, last fall) and what we've learned from others on Braemar's staff, Vallierie very clearly resisted improving the quality of our golf course. Dwan, Meadowbrook, Brookview, Wirth are among the courses that are better maintained than Edina's! Sadly, he was consistently supported by you -- even when many of us pointed out to you what was going on. You turned a blind eye. We had our annual party last night and talked about this. Among other things we all agreed that like Goodrich in St. Paul, Braeamar is losing revenue this year in important part because of its reputation for poor greens. Todd Anderson is a good man who's responding to the need for greens on par with other high traffic munys around town. But make no mistake, you and John Vallierie dealt him a very poor starting hand. Thank you for your time. - Ron Way EVERYONE: We had a hot time (literally) at last night's party; a nice breeze and lively chat under ample shade made for an enjoyable evening with golfing friends. Especially worthwhile was our interlude discussion on the quality of Braemar under new mgt. We agree that our greens are better, and Todd Anderson is responding to the long desire for greens at least on par with other high - traffic munys. Braemar still needs improving, like the fairways (speculation is that past mgt's tepid reaction to drought and heat a few years ago left some fairways unable to recover). Unfairly to the new manager, Braemar's reputation of poor quality has surely affected its ability to attract golfers in a period of sagging golf interest. Regular golfers avoid courses with a bad rap; as Goodrich in St. Paul has discovered. Yes, Todd is responding. BUT ... there remains a Braemar "kabal" that, curiously and sadly, supported past mgt's distorted view of what a golf course should be. Now that we have a favorably - inclined manager (one who actually knows golf), we must support his efforts to get Braemar onto the list of quality venues. Tell Todd (and John Justice on the Greens Committee) your continuing want for a better course. In other news, Edina Animal Control says it has NOT removed Braemar's coyotes, which have done a marvelous job of taking out the geese and things like burrowing moles. Since we haven't heard them this summer, they've likely "gone silent" (perhaps reacting to noise and vibration of Hwy. 169 construction) or moved the den. But, he said, the coyote population remains very healthy in Edina and around Braemar. Thanks for your interest in good golf, and thanks for attending the party. Great time... - Ron C H R I S T PRESBYTERIAN Inspiring all generations to follow Jesus, love others, and live missionally. CHURCH JUL z t eon July 21, 2011 City Council of Edina 4801 West 50'' ,Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor and Members of the Council: Thank you for taking time to solicit feedback regarding the multiple - income option for housing on the Colonial Church proposed site. I want to encourage you allow the proposal, adding mixed income housing to the proposal. This community has been . blessed on so many levels, and we ought to be in the vanguard of reaching out to those less fortunate than our norm. Additionally, the diversity we might gain from expanding our circle would benefit the entire community, sensitizing us to the larger dynamics our state faces., As the proposal has been scaled back, there certainly can be no significant sense in which we would be changing the overall dynamic within the neighborhood or community. I will support you in the months to come as you weigh these decisions about the fabric of our life together, and the, values which undergird its composition. Know that I will be praying, on behalf of the people of Christ Presbyterian, for your wisdom, courage and discernment. Sincerely, Dr. John Crosby Senior Pastor, Christ Presbyterian Susan Howl From: Jordan Gilgenbach Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 9:39 AM To: Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Joni Bennett; Josh Sprague; Mary Brindle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Indoor Turf Field /Recreation Facility for Edina " (2� WECEOp//�� VLc, ©' JUL 2 1 2011 Jordan Gilgenbach, Communications Coordinator tl 952 - 363 -3564 e iailaenbach(&ci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com For Living, Learning, Raising Families &Doing Business From: KERRY MCGRAIN [mailto:kmcgrain @msn.com] Sent: Thursday, July 21, 20119:29 AM To: Jordan Gilgenbach Subject: Indoor Turf Field/ Recreation Facility for Edina We fully support this. Please get it done Kerry and Nora McGrain 5229 Minnehaha Blvd kmcgrainC)msn.com 612- 817 -6321 1 .. __. _ .. July 21, 2011 Board of Hennepin County Commissioners C/o Yolanda McCrary, Deputy Clerk of the Board A -2400 Government Center Minneapolis, Minnesota 55487 -0240 Dear Ms. McCrary: I will not seek re- appointment to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed Board. I have been a member of the Nine Mile Board for five terms, or 15 years. It-has been a privilege for me to serve these past years. As Park Director. I,worked with the Nine Mile Board when developing Mud Lake or Bredeson Park Between my work for`the City of Edina as Park Director and Manager, I have worked closely.with'the Nine Mile Board for more than 50 years. These past years have been very rewarding sine I could see the impact of the Board on the growth and development of the Nine Mile Watershed and the six communities it serves. I especially enjoyed participating in the 50 year history book of the Watershed. I was fortunate to work with a capable group of past and present board members under the leadership of our President Luann Tolliver. The board, with my small input, has done an excellent job regarding the decisions of watershed management. Again I want to thank you for the privilege of working with the Nine Mile Watershed for the past 15 years. Sincerely, . -1�O J Robert J. Kojetin 5016 William Avenue - Edina, Minnesota 55436.952- 929 -8889 Susan Howl From: Jordan Gilgenbach Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 8:28 AM To: Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Joni Bennett; Josh Sprague; Mary Brindle Cc: Subject: Susan Howl FW: It's a non brainer please make the Dome happen R E (C 2 I n V0 E tfD1JULoL221 2011 <'t -;. Jordan Gilgenbach, Communications Coordinator --------- - - - - -- 952 -826 -0396 1 Fax 952- 826 -0389 1 Cell 612- 363 -3564 iQilQenbach(aaci.edina.mmus I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Stafford, Dina [mailto:stafford.dm @pg.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 20116:37 PM To: Jordan Gilgenbach Subject: It's a non brainer please make the Dome happen We are all driving all over the city to have our kids participate in winter dome sports. It's a no brainer. We will lose families to surrounding communities if this is not address and soon. Susan Howl From: Jordan Gilgenbach Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2011 8:27 AM To: Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Joni Bennett; Josh Sprague; Mary Brindle IR IE C E 0 V E V Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: All weather dome JUL 2 1 2011 --------- - - - - -� Jordan Gilgenbach, Communications Coordinator 952 - 826 -0396 i Fax 952 -826-0389 1 Cell 612-363-3564 iailgenbach(..ci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ...For. Living, Learning, Raising Families ESL Doing Business From: KevinMacll @comcast.net [mailto:KevinMacll @comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 5:29 PM To: Jordan Gilgenbach Subject: All weather dome Attention City Council of Edina, My wife and family are in support of an all weather indoor training facility for the Edina community. Both of our older children left the Edina soccer program because they couldn't consistently train during the winter months. Our eighth grade son is also at a competitive disadvantage to the rest of his conference with his lacrosse team. When we visit the Plymouth dome, it is always crowded with recreational joggers and walkers during our son's lacrosse clinics. In conclusion, an all- weather dome would be a real asset to the entire Edina community. Sincerely, Kevin McCarthy 612- 578 -2974 i Susan Howl Dear Honorable Mayor Hovland and Honorable Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague, and Ann Swenson: "The Humane Society of the United States is reaching out ... around the country, offering special training on how to deal with conflicts involving one of America's hardiest wild creatures: coyotes." For more information, you may click on "coyotes" in the sentence above or click on "keep the peace with coyotes" at the bottom of this excerpted message from the Humane Society. Thank you! Sadie Schrader 16-AW -4W THE HUMANE SOCIETY AF THE UNITFQ MTFS u Coyote Problems? We're teaching communities how to safely and humanely solve conflicts with coyotes. JUL 2 0 2011 Learn what we're doing and how you can put our techniques to work to keel) the peace with coyotes» 1 WARNER LAW LLC VIA FIRST CLASS US MAIL July 14, 2011 The Honorable James B. Hovland, Esq. Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 JUL 2 0 2011 Re: 5800 Beard — Neighbor's Home Watch Dear Mayor Hovland: As a long -time Edina resident and informal chair of my neighborhood's home watch committee, I wanted to send a quick note of acknowledgment for the hard work, professional demeanor, and recent assistance of the City's new Crime Prevention Coordinator, Ms. Kaylin Martin. Our neighborhood recently held its annual home watch meetingiblock party. Ms. Martin helped schedule the affair, arrange, for the SWAT team to visit (with the City's bearcat vehicle), and gave an excellent presentation on some recent crime statistics under difficult circumstances; namely, competing with a full -size inflatable jumper and hoard of neighborhood kids. Kaylin is a wonderful addition to the City's excellent staff and, as such, I personally wanted to take the time to ensure her contributions did not go unnoticed. 1515 ONE FINANCIAL PLAZA 120 SOUTH SIXTH STREET MINNEAPOLIS. MN 55402 GEORGECR)WARNERLAWI- IN.COM OFFICE 952/922/7700 FAX 612/339/9055 WARNERLAWMN.COM Susan Howl From: Jordan Gilgenbach Sent: To: Thursday, July 21, 2011 8:15 AM Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Joni Bennett; Josh Sprague; Mary Brindle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Indoor facility In RECE E JUL 2 0 2011 a Jordan Gilgenbach, Communications Coordinator 952 - 826 -0396 i Fax 952 - 826 -0389 ( Cell 612- 363 -3564 — — — "' " ` 1. iailgenbach(fti.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ...For. living, Learning, Raising families & Doing Business From: Amy Ware [mailto:gardenware @comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 20119:52 PM To: Jordan Gilgenbach Subject: Indoor facility Edina is in complete need of an indoor sports facility and we are in total support of one. Thanks, Amy and Alex Ware 1 Susan Howl From: Jordan Gilgenbach Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 4:35 PM To: Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Joni Bennett; Josh Sprague; Mary Brindle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: please direct. to: Mayor James Hovland and Council Members: Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle; Josh Sprague and Ann Swenson Jordan Gilgenbach, Communications Coordinator JUL 2.0 2011 Eat i` 952- 826 -0396 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 1 Cell 612 - 363 -3564 igilgenbach anci.edina.mn.us www.CitvofEdina.com _ _ _ _ ...For° Living, Learning, Raring Families & Doing Business From: Frannie Kuhs [mailto :kuhsx001 @umn.edu] Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 12:51 PM ; To Jordan Gilgenbach . Subject: please direct to: Mayor James Hovland and Council Members: Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague and Ann Swenson Dear Council Members: We are writing to add our voices to those who do not support the current proposed dome location at Braemar North or any location that creates a net -loss in Edina grass fields. We strongly agree with those suggesting that any dome built in Edina should yield a net increase in the number of playing fields for the people of Edina. Thank you for your consideration. Jeffrey and Frances Kuhs 1 Susan Howl From: Jordan Gilgenbach Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2011 8:53 AM To: Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Joni Bennett; Josh Sprague; Mary Brindle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Dome Support I'® =� JUL 2 0 2011 Jordan Gilgenbach, Communications Coordinator --------- - - - - -- f' 952- 826 -0396 1 Fax 952 -826 -0389 1 Cell 612 - 363 -3564 iQiloenbach((Dci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Marc Usem [mailto:marc @ubcapital.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 20114:16 AM To: Jordan Gilgenbach Subject: Dome Support Dear Edina City Council Members, I am writing to support the idea of an indoor Domed turf field /recreation facility in Edina. Given our long winters, I am confident that an indoor athletic facility would be fully utilized and a terrific asset for the city and all of the local athletes who may be able to participate in extended sports and training opportunities. I would leave it in the hands of the council and planning commissions to decide on the most favorable location and other particulars. Thank you for all your hard work and for considering this proposal in particular. Regards, Marc Usem USEM BERGSTRAND CAPTTAL MANAGEMENT, H.0 5775 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55416 612- 338 -1225 marc@ubcapital.com www.QuantOneLP.com 1 Susan Howl RIECIEWE JUL._ Z 0 2011 From: Ron Sorem [mai Ito: rsorem @comcast. net] --------------- Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 12:43 PM To: Jordan Gilgenbach Cc: rasorem @hotmail.com Subject: ,Wanted - Edina Indoor Turf; Field /Recreation Facility! 'To: Mayor: James Hovland, Council Members: Joni Bennett, Mary Brindle, Josh Sprague and Ann Swenson We are a group of Edina parents like you, who chose to live in Edina for all of the reasons that make this community special. We are focused on ways to continue that feeling of "community" for current and future generations of Edina residents. Our focus today is on creating an Indoor Recreation Facility for Edina.... This is something Edina has needed for along time. I have seen how Edina has fallen behind other communities as our kids travel to other (older & younger) cities to practice or play their games at their indoor facilities — and that's been very frustrating. The addition of our turf fields has been tremendous for extending our outdoor playing seasons and has lowered the number of cancellations due to our unpredictable wet Minnesota weather. The addition of the Indoor Rec. Facility would not only help cover our needs for the long winter season but would get full time use all year long (like today when it's 100 degrees with possible storms...). Our family fully supports Indoor Recreation Facility for Edina — we hope you will too! Thank you. Ron Sorem 5524 Malibu Dr. Edina, MN 55436 1 D r MuY i o f E�i�.ii iii C uric iy 1 i�1 i VV% i wondering if we can start a baseball league. Can you donate a trophy? Are you ok with e- mailing people and asking them if they want to start a team in ou; l`agUn? RECEUME D A 2 0 2ou NI 1 rVSV,� i 7208 a &Trudy Olson o ddale Ave. S. 43IL ':S, M44- -554. � Edina, MN 55435,,w:� To Gdjv\-ou a-�y t+a,,Ll N\a.yq�- Q-C E `IN, 501- " s 1 1 J \ /1 ,�I�Illlllll.tJ�l 111l ll�llyl�l 't�l�lllllt��ll71�i11I1I1111 UAAJ JUL 2 0 i o � Le v @� �y • ,�roRPOAA�9/ IBBB REPORURECOMMEN DATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item IX. -2 DEBRA MANGEN F] Action From: CITY CLERK Discussion ® Information Date: AUGUST 3, 2011 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED AFTER PACKETS INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received after the packets were delivered to you. IVED q� 0 3 2011 July 31, 2011 The Honorable Jim Hovland, Mayor, City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Jim: 5700 Tucker Lane Edina, MN.55436 With respect to the proposed code of conduct for contractors being considered by the Council, I sure hope that the code will include all contractors doing work in Edina and not just those contractors who tear down and /or build houses. Specifically, I have in mind the contractor(s) who will construct the Nine Mile Creek bike trail. As you know, there are many Edina homeowners whose houses are located adjacent to the proposed trail who will be affected by the racket generated by the construction, which will include: (a) the cutting' down of countless trees, some of which are huge, and the removal of the stumps and the chipping of the felled trees; (b) many trucks which will be used for dumping a huge amount of fill along the watershed from Dovre Drive and Londonderry Drive (now Duncan Drive) to level the earth for the trail; (c) the construction of a huge concrete retaining wall which will be built in the watershed from Dovre to Duncan; (d) the drilling of countless holes in the wetlands and the filling, of such holes with'posts to stabilize the many wooden boardwalks over the wetlands; and (e) the many earth- moving machines, including bulldozers which will be used in the construction of the trail. Just a thought. Sincerely, Richard C hnson United.States Golf. Association 4001 W. 49th Street, Edina, MN 55424 T 952 927.8372 ERICE4801 ®aol.com www.usga.org August 1, 2011 Mr. Jim Hovland, Mayor City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Jim On Friday, July 15th, the USGAconducted their sectional qualifier for the US Women's Amateur Championship, at the Braemar Golf.Course. It was an international field of 38 players representing 10 US States, Australia and Canada. I am happy to report that not only is Braemar a wonderful facility, its staff is very professional and it was a pleasure to work with them. Todd Anderson, Mary Woodridge and Tom Swenson, all did a terrific job. and the USGA is grateful. What is truly exceptional was in the days leading up to the qualifier, the weather conditions were hot, humid and rainy. However, when we 'arrived on Friday, everything was "perfect" for our event. It was clear that the grounds crew in particular had put in the extra effort to present a challenging and well groomed golf course. Unfortunately, the weather did not cooperate and there were numerous storms and delays throughout the day, resulting in suspension of play at 4:30pm until the next day; Saturday. While this was not expected, the staff was agreeable in every way to make it possible from rescheduling patrons on the tee sheet to getting the golf course back in championship condition. One,person in,particular, Bob Atol, assistant Superintendent, really stepped up to deliver a surprisingly fair and playable golf course after 3 inches of rain in 24 hours. Many of the local courses including Interlachen and Edina County Club were closed on Saturday morning due to these extreme conditions. Bob and his crew worked tirelessly to drain water, restore'the bunkers and cut the greens. They even built a temporary "bridge" from 16 green to 17 tee, where the ground was under water. Our players were amazed how well the golf course played given the conditions. Thank you to Braemar and the City 'of Edina for allowing us to conduct our qualifier at Braemar Golf Club. We realize that it is a sacrifice to_the public and perhaps the bottom line. However, whenever asked, Braemar and the City of Edina steps up to take their turn. Golf and the community are the beneficiaries of this generosity. Sincere Ede Rice Official in Charge r August 3, 2011 n /AUG 0 3 2011 Mayor Hovland and Council Members: --------- - - - - -- This memorandum is a supplement to the materials that I submitted to the City of Edina's Planning Commission on July 13, 2011. 1 continue, to be opposed to the development proposed by the Waters Senior Living of Edina ( "Waters Senior Living ") for the Colonial Church site because, in my opinion; the development does not comply with the provisions of Ordinance 850.13, subd. 2D which states: "Rest Homes, C onvalescent homes and .nursing homes." By their own admission at numerous meetings, the Waters Senior Living representatives have described their proposal as a registered assisted living facility with .a memory unit and some services. A facility that is "registered" with the State of Minnesota is NOT a facility that requires itself to be "licensed" by the State. This facility appears to fall under the definition provided in Minnesota Statutes Section 144D.01 subd 4 which is entitled "Housing with services establishment or establishment ". Under paragraph (a) housing with services means (1) an establishment providing sleeping accommodations to one or more adult residents, at least 80 percent of which are 55 years of age or older, and offering or providing, for a fee, one or more regularly scheduled health- related services.... In paragraph (b), it clearly states that a housing for services establishment does not include: (1) a nursing home licensed under chapter 144A, a hospital, certified boarding care home, or supervised living facility licensed under sections 144.50 to 144.56 and other types of facilities not applicable here. Ordinance 850.13 subd. 2D is inclusive in that it is limited to rest homes, convalescent homes and nursing homes, all of which are licensed under either the above - referenced Minnesota Statutes sections 144A or 144.50 et al. As stated herein, the Waters Senior Living is not a licensed facility and does not come within the intended meaning of the city's ordinance. Unfortunately, the City of Edina has not maintained its ordinances in a modern and updated fashion. Ordinance 850.03, subd 3 does not contain a definition of an assisted living or a housing for services facility. It contains only an outdated definition of a convalescent home (which is, at best, a predecessor to the current terminology for a boarding care home as described in the Minnesota Statutes.) The city's definition describes a convalescent home as "a building or group of buildings LICENSED (emphasis added) by the Minnesota Department of Public Welfare for the care of children, the aged or infirm, or a place of rest and care for those suffering physical or mental disorders...." Subdivision 2 states, in part, that "...any use not specifically allowed by this Section in a district as a principal, accessory or conditional use, shall not' be allowed or permitted in that district by implication, interpretation or other construction of, or, meaning given to, the wording of this Section...." It is my.opinion that the City cannot place a non - licensed facility under this definition. Again, the Waters Senior Living is a registered but not a licensed facility. 1 At the same time, the Waters Senior Living does not appear to qualify as a PSR facility (the section of the ordinance used by all other facilities in the city) because its living units are considerably larger in square footage than is permitted by the PSR ordinance. The developer's proposal is only for the amendment of the original plan which was approved: in 2010•along with the new application, for' pplication ,for a''subdivision of the property. I request that the City of Edina'deny the...current- proposal, table the original proposal, and deny the subdivision until such time as the City adopts an ordinance which' is in sync with the current definitions utilized by the Minnesota Department of Health, and which determines appropriate standards for parking,, building height; lot, coverage, setbacks, and usage. et al. Only then will the developers, the community citizens, and the City of Edina achieve a "level playing field". designed to provide the reasonable certainty that all'need when considering and evaluating development within: the city. Thank you. Gordon V. Johnson 5837 Jeff Place .Edina, MN 55436 -1937 , 2 July 13, 2011 Chairman Gabiel and Members of the Planning Commission: I am Gordon Johnson, 5837 Jeff Place, Edina, Minnesota. I am speaking in opposition to the proposal by the Waters Senior Living of Edina to amend its development. plan,. as well as the.,Final Plat. ,Since day one this„ development has been proceeding under the wrong City of Edina Ordinance. If the City felt. it was embarrassed by the recent oversights in the Ebenezer York Gardens project, it should be even more embarrassed by the current status of this development.. The Proponent has been quoted several times that its development is a registered assisted living facility with a memory unit and some services. As recently.. as June 27, 2011, City Planner. Cary Teague, in. an e-mail to Christine Henninger, stated that the Waters Senior Living applied under PRD -5 "...BECAUSE THAT IS THE TYPE OF USE THEY ARE...." I strongly believe that Mr. Teague continues to be wrong in his belief. The PRD -5 provision under Ordinance 850.13 is clear and unambiguous in its language - A PRD -5 facility is limited to a rest home, convalescent home or a nursing home. There is no supplemental language in this ordinance that would include any other type of use. It has long been the position of the Courts that a statute, ordinance, agreement, et al that is clear and unambiguous on its face must be limited to its plain and simple meaning. The Waters Senior Living, by both the definition ;of the ordinance and by the statements of its spokesperson, Jay Jenson, is not a rest home, convalescent home; or a nursing home. It is not a licensed facility. It is a registered facility. There is a significant: difference in these two definitions. Even if the Waters Senior Living somehow fell within the definition attributed to the PRD -5 zoning; it could not receive a building permit since Minnesota Statutes 144A has placed a moratorium on the building of all such facilities within the State of Minnesota. Unfortunately, the Waters Senior Living does not qualify for a PSR zoning either because its proposed units'are too large under the City's ordinance. The City restricts PSR zoning to units with a square footage of approximately 500 to 850 square feet. A number of the Waters,Senior Living units are in excess of 1,400 square feet and virtually none fall within the ordinance range. The various PRD -1 to PRD -3 zoning provisions are also inadequate since they provide for a building far smaller than what the Waters Senior Living is proposing. This development has become a real quagmire. However, the root fault does not lie with either the Countryside Neighborhood or the developer._ The source of the root fault lies exclusively with the City of Edina. It has not seen fit to develop an assisted living facility ordinance even though such facilities have been in existence for a number of years in the metro areas. The City has not met its 'obligations in the .PSR zone area either. Facilities such .as Walker Place, The York Continental, York Gardens, and Sunrise. Assisted Living all fail to meet the PSR space limitations: ;PSR zoning was created. a number of years ago to permit developers to build AFFORDABLE'senior housing designed to permit more units on a site than would, otherwise be permitted. "The above - referenced facilities have all exceeded, in whole or in;part, the language'of the PSR ordinance.. We cannot simply place a proposed development within the context of any ordinance whether we believe the development is desirable �or not. The citizens of the community are entitled to. rely upon (1) the published and approved ordinances, and (2) the appointed rl, and elected city officials and employees- to properly follow; the ordinances and other guidelines developed for ihe'orderly improvement of the community. it is my request that the City of Edina either. (1) permit the Waters Senior Living to withdraw its amendment, original development plan and subdivision request, or (2) table the entire project until such time as the City has an appropriate ordinance capable of properly addressing the assisted living issue. It is my understanding that a Planned Urban Development (PUD) does not work either since the proposed site is zoned as an R -1 district. The Developer should not be put in a position to be zoned for something it is not and indirectly be involved in causing undue risk to a neighborhood and City through inappropriate zoning through no fault of its own. Before a development of this size and magnitude should go,forward, the City, the Developer AND all neighborhoods (not just the Countryside Neighborhood) should know what density, building height, floor area ratio (FAR), setbacks, and parking requirements, et al, to name a few, will be permitted to be built in an Assisted Living facility ordinance. Tonight we °know none of this information. Ini my opinion, the City has failed its citizens to date relative to the Waters Senior Living development and other projects as noted herein. Let us stop here. Let us not make matters worse than they already are! Thank you. Gordon Johnson 5837 Jeff Place 'Edina, MN 55436 2 Susan Howl From: Safety In the Park.[mailto :safetyinthepark @gmail.com] W EC E PVE D dent: Sunday, July 31, 2011,2:152 PM AUG 0 3 2011 To: undisclosed - recipients Subject: Update: EAW Appeal Hello, First and foremost we want to thank you for the outpouring of support for the. EAW Appeal. In a 24 hour. period we had 120 households give their names in support of -the appeal. The.appeal was filed last Thursday setting in motion a series of deadlines before the final decision. We are told the entire process could, take up to 6 months. At this point, MnDOT has 14 days to gather the materials they need and respond. As the process moves forward we will keep you updated. Many of you had questions about the appeal. Below is a list. that should clarify what we are doing, however if you have more questions please feel free to ask. • We are not filing suit. We're simply appealing the EAW decision. As our attorney has pointed out, if we DON'T appeal we send the message to everyone including M'NbOT that we are OK with all of their responses to our comments. • Mr. Lightfoot has also mentioned that this will, in no way, slow down the re -route or SWLRT because both can run concurrently. Hennepin County would like to make it seem so, but that's not the case. • The appeal simply states that we think MNDOT should open an EIS (Environmental Impact Statement), nothing more. • We are not giving up on stopping the re- route. This appeal is just one of many avenues to follow toward that end. Again, thank you, Jami LaPray and Thom Miller Safety in the Park! Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 12:56 PM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Pedestrian safety 1G loo lG 0 e/ lC AUG 0 3 2011 Lynette Biunno, Receptionist - -- �' 952 - 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(cDci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Lorenzo Tunesi [mailto :lorenzo.tunesi @gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 11:46 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Pedestrian safety Dear members of the City Council, I understand that the pedestrian bridge over France Av by 72nd Street is being reconsidered for a variety of reasons (financial, feasibility, etc). I would like to make sure you understand that the main impetus behind the idea of the bridge was to provide a safe environment for pedestrians to cross France Av in a dangerous location where motorists do not particularly think of pedestrians because they are driving on a 6 lane fast road. Many Cornelia neighborhoods residents like to walk to Byerly's, Target, the Edina Promenade, etc., they also go to France Av to take express buses to downtown Minneapolis. During all my conversations with them that touch the topic of crossing France Av the issue of safety comes up. If a pedestrian bridge is not to be built other means of ensuring pedestrian safety must be implemented. There are options such as high quality at grade crossings that would insulate pedestrians from the traffic while in the middle of the road and I would highly encourage you to look at those and plan for them. Edina, with its high traditional quality of life indicators, is unfortunately starting to lag in more contemporary measures such as bikeability and walkability. Ensuring that pedestrians can safely walk from their neighborhoods to local shopping and leisure destinations would address this lag. Respectfully, Lorenzo Tunesi 4413 Ellsworth Dr Edina, MN 55435 Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 12:48 PM c: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Edina dome � �� � O �� AUG 0 3 2011 Lynette Biunno, Receptionist -- I . 952 - 927 -8861 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunnota'1)ci.edina.mn.us I www.CitvofEdina.com 9 1 ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Hirsch, Greg [mailto:ghirsch @wipfli.com] Sent: Monday, August 01, 2011 11:10 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Edina dome Mayor Hovland, Council members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague @ Swenson: I am very much in support of an Indoor Turf / Recreational Facility. Greg Hirsch, long -time Edina resident. ' rC I°lirt3;: Partner I Wipfli LLP I Office: (952) 548 -3362 1 Cell: (952) 334 -7080 7601 S. France Avenue, Suite 400, Edina, MN 55435 www.wipfli.com One of Accounting Today's Top 25 Accounting Firms The content of this E -mail and any attached files is confidential, and may be subject to certain privilege. This email is intended for the designated recipient(s) only. If you have received this E -mail in error, please immediately contact the sender. Pursuant to Treasury Circular 230, the IRS requires us to advise you that if this email (or any attachment) contains advice concerning any federal tax issue, it was not written or intended to be used, and may not be used, for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties. WIPFLI LLP CPAs and Consultants Susan Howl Importance: High From: Dan Wolfe [ mailto :wolfdog @saunders- therapy.com] �({�° v E Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 7:31 'PM To;; Lynette Biunno AUS 0 3 2011 Subject: Edina Dome Importance: High -- - ---- ------- Dear Council Men and Women — I recently read that you met with a group who is interested in building a dome in Edina. I previously wrote you a letter in support of this project. In the Sun newspaper article, it mentioned that Council Women Joni Bennett Wanted .a study done regarding current parks /facility usage. Council Woman Barnett, I can tell you right now, without a study, that there, is zero usage of Edina parks /facilities for any field sports,during the winter months and early spring, Which is why we are searching for ways to get a dome built in.Edina. The point is that we need a facility that can be utilized'in the winter and early spring months. Currently our Edina teams are paying to help support nearby community's domes during that time. The question is.not'about the`need for another field during the summer months, although I'm betting another _field. _ . would be well used (I recently, attended our son's lacrosse game, that was scheduled at 8:30pm due to field availability (it had to be called on account of darkness.after three quarters). The point is that we need a facility,for our teams and other community events during the winter and early spring months. Hopefully common sense will prevail. Please do not burden city employees or spend any tax payers money to look at park /facility usage. With all due respect, Council Women Bennett, don't burden this project with unneeded bureaucratic busy work. Respectfully, Da4lil WOW 6520 Indian Hills Road. Edina, Mini 55439 (W) (952) 924 -0199 wolfdoRA,saunders- therapy.com r DECEIVED Susan Howl Dear Mayor Hovland and Council Members, I --------------- I understand the city's desire to affordable senior housing but wish to express my concern that the description of how affordable units will be provided as described by Mr. Jay Jensen of Shelter Corporation are not realistic. He has stated that the use of the Minnesota Dept of Human Services Elderly Waivers program will allow seniors to afford to live at the proposed Shelter Corporation Living Waters Assisted Living Residence. Rent is not a service paid for by the Elderly Waivers program. Last January I consulted with the geriatric case manager I had hired to help with my mother's transition from assisted living to a nursing home to get more information on elderly waivers because the scenario that Mr Jensen has described did not match my own experience. Her reply to my email was: Unless it's a subsidized apartment building (like Section 8, HUD, etc., where low income residents' rent is limited to 1/3 of their income), here's how EW works in a nutshell: the resident has to qualify for Medical Assistance, and has to be at risk of nursing home placement due to need for services; this is determined by an assessment by the County. If the person lives in an assisted living building that accepts EW, and if there is an EW designated unit available, the resident still has to have income sufficient to pay the rent portion of the monthly care costs. For example, if someone moved into an assisted living building that costs $4900 a month, the building would inform which portion of that is the rent and which is the care cost. The person has to have high enough income to pay that rent portion, and that's one of the reasons why EW is not the great solution we all used to think it was. DHS document, Medical Assistance Program Information for People:... Getting Elderly Waiver Services to be very helpful. Here is the link: https:Hedocs.dhs. state .mn.us /ifserver /Public /DHS- 2908 -ENG The brochure referenced here is attached above. For a list of services provided please open the second attachment "ew Svc list" above. This past spring, several members of our neighborhood met with Jay Jensen at Colonial Church because he wanted to explain his proposed building reduction with the addition of affordable housing units before the proposal went to the city council. The scenario he described was that an affordable unit would cost between 2,000. and 2,500. per month. The Metropolitan Council defines "low income" as $27,000. year. For the sake of simpler math, we used 2,000 /month for rent/meals x 12 months would be 24,000 a year for rent and delivered meals. This leaves the senior citizen with 250. per month for every other expense. Realistic? I think not, given that the senior has to be at both an income and care level needed to be eligible for Medical Assistance. In addition to all of the other problems associated with this Shelter Corporation project the unrealistic projections of "affordable" combined with the health care profession moving away from assisted living as an effective way to solve the long term care issues facing local governments lead me to ask you to please deny the subdivision of the Colonial Church property. Please let Shelter Corporation withdraw it's original plan and then rewrite the ordinance to realistically express affordable senior housing. The Shelter Corp luxury assisted living apartment building does not fit the Dickensian description of Edina's definition of a convalescent home: a building or group of buildings licensed by the Minnesota Dept of Public Welfare for the care of children, the aged or infirm, or a place of rest and care for those suffering physical or mental disorders. Please deny the subdivision and go back to the proverbial drawing board. Thank you. Sincerely, Dorothy Kerzner, 5828 Jeff Place, 952 - 848 -4959 Work, 952- 221 -1893 Cell, 952 -928- 9431 Home Medical Assistance (MAI What is MA? Medical Assistance (MA) is a Minnesota health care program that can help pay for all or part of your medical expenses, including your long -term care services. What are long -term care services? Long -term care services include: © Skilled nursing facility care you receive when you reside in a nursing home. o Services covered by any home and community - based waiver programs, such as the Elderly Waiver (EW) program. What is the Elderly Waiver (EW) Program? The EW program funds home and community - based services for people age 65 and older who are eligible for MA and require the level of care provided in a nursing home but choose to live in the community. How do I qualify for MA? You must meet program rules, including income and asset limits, to qualify for MA. Are there special program rules in order for MA to pay for long -term care services? Yes. You must meet certain program rules in order for MA to pay for your long -term care services. We discuss these rules in other sections of this brochure. ® You must meet the program rules for VIA, including the income and asset limits. m You must meet the level of care requirements. a, The equity in your home cannot be more than the home equity limit unless an exception applies. 13 You must name DHS a preferred remainder beneficiary of certain annuities owned by you or your spouse ® You cannot be subject to a penalty period because you or your spouse gave away income or assets. If you qualify for IVIA but do not qualify for MA payment of your long -term care services, MA will not pay for your nursing home costs and you are not eligible to receive services covered by any home and community -based waiver program. If I qualify, when will MA start? MA can start up to three months before the month the county agency gets your request for coverage. If you qualify for EW, EW generally starts once you have been determined eligible for MA and your case manager has authorized the services that you need. DH5- z908•ENG '7-11 -- a .. LiWing .in ca 1�9ursing Horrke u O ". tihe.Ti ncpaftFnwrnf Human services.' ts 1Vlinnesota Health Care Proams -al- e Astista. 1k, f tifib o - � Medical Assistance (MAI What is MA? Medical Assistance (MA) is a Minnesota health care program that can help pay for all or part of your medical expenses, including your long -term care services. What are long -term care services? Long -term care services include: © Skilled nursing facility care you receive when you reside in a nursing home. o Services covered by any home and community - based waiver programs, such as the Elderly Waiver (EW) program. What is the Elderly Waiver (EW) Program? The EW program funds home and community - based services for people age 65 and older who are eligible for MA and require the level of care provided in a nursing home but choose to live in the community. How do I qualify for MA? You must meet program rules, including income and asset limits, to qualify for MA. Are there special program rules in order for MA to pay for long -term care services? Yes. You must meet certain program rules in order for MA to pay for your long -term care services. We discuss these rules in other sections of this brochure. ® You must meet the program rules for VIA, including the income and asset limits. m You must meet the level of care requirements. a, The equity in your home cannot be more than the home equity limit unless an exception applies. 13 You must name DHS a preferred remainder beneficiary of certain annuities owned by you or your spouse ® You cannot be subject to a penalty period because you or your spouse gave away income or assets. If you qualify for IVIA but do not qualify for MA payment of your long -term care services, MA will not pay for your nursing home costs and you are not eligible to receive services covered by any home and community -based waiver program. If I qualify, when will MA start? MA can start up to three months before the month the county agency gets your request for coverage. If you qualify for EW, EW generally starts once you have been determined eligible for MA and your case manager has authorized the services that you need. a ®ple: a .. LiWing .in ca 1�9ursing Horrke o a (Gibing -Elderly Waiver Services. 2'dizs anformrttiori is ctive july. 1, 2011, through tune 30, 2012. Medical Assistance (MAI What is MA? Medical Assistance (MA) is a Minnesota health care program that can help pay for all or part of your medical expenses, including your long -term care services. What are long -term care services? Long -term care services include: © Skilled nursing facility care you receive when you reside in a nursing home. o Services covered by any home and community - based waiver programs, such as the Elderly Waiver (EW) program. What is the Elderly Waiver (EW) Program? The EW program funds home and community - based services for people age 65 and older who are eligible for MA and require the level of care provided in a nursing home but choose to live in the community. How do I qualify for MA? You must meet program rules, including income and asset limits, to qualify for MA. Are there special program rules in order for MA to pay for long -term care services? Yes. You must meet certain program rules in order for MA to pay for your long -term care services. We discuss these rules in other sections of this brochure. ® You must meet the program rules for VIA, including the income and asset limits. m You must meet the level of care requirements. a, The equity in your home cannot be more than the home equity limit unless an exception applies. 13 You must name DHS a preferred remainder beneficiary of certain annuities owned by you or your spouse ® You cannot be subject to a penalty period because you or your spouse gave away income or assets. If you qualify for IVIA but do not qualify for MA payment of your long -term care services, MA will not pay for your nursing home costs and you are not eligible to receive services covered by any home and community -based waiver program. If I qualify, when will MA start? MA can start up to three months before the month the county agency gets your request for coverage. If you qualify for EW, EW generally starts once you have been determined eligible for MA and your case manager has authorized the services that you need. How do I apply for MA? Fill out a Minnesota Health Care Programs Application for Payment of Long -Term Care Services (DHS- 3531). Give the completed application to your county human services agency. To get an application: a' Call DHS at (651) 431 -2670 or (800) 657 -3739. ® Call or go to your county agency. Call DHS at the above number to get the address and phone number of your county agency. ® Download the application from our website at w-ww.dhs.state.mn.us/healthcare/applications. It is important to give your application to your county agency right away. What if I have questions? If you have questions or need help, call your county agency. You can also make an appointment to meet with a financial worker. A financial worker is a person who determines eligibility for MA. The financial worker will explain MA to you and will answer your questions. You can also call the Senior LinkAge Line® if you are 60 or older at (800) 333 -2433 or the Disability Linkage Line' if you are a person with a disability at (866) 333 -2466. Assets Is there an asset limit to qualify for MA? Most people must have assets within a certain limit in order to qualify for MA. The asset limit is $3,000 for most people age 65 or older or who are disabled. Program rules determine which types of assets we count toward your asset limit. What assets are counted for MA? Some of the assets we count are listed below. ® Cash * Bank accounts ® Stocks and bonds * Savings certificates ® Non - homestead property ® More than one vehicle a Contracts for deed What assets are not counted for MA? - Some of the assets we do not count are listed below. • Clothing • Personal jewelry • Household goods • One vehicle * Some assets used for burial expenses H Certain assets owned by an American Indian Can my spouse keep any of our assets? If your spouse does not receive long -term care services, you must complete an asset assessment in order to determine the amount of assets your spouse can keep that will not count toward your asset limit. See the Asset Assessment section for more information. Can I protect any of my assets? If you have a long -term care insurance policy that qualifies as a Long -Term Care Partnership policy, you may be able to get MA even if your counted assets are more than the limit. To get more information: ® Call or go to your county agency and ask for the Long -Term Care Partnership and Medical Assistance Asset Protection (DHS -5426) brochure. * Download the brochure from our website at https: / /edocs.dhs.state.mn.us 2 h T Will 1 have to sell my home if I move into a nursing home? We do not count your home as an asset if one of the following family members lives in the home: ® Your spouse ® Child under age 21 ® Child who is blind or has a disability ® Brother or sister who owns the home with you and lived there at least one year before you moved into the nursing home Child or grandchild who lived with you and helped take care of you for at least two years before you went into the nursing home or began receiving EW services. If one of the above family members does not reside in your home, we will not count your home as an asset: * If you plan to return to your home and it is reasonable to expect that you will return home. * For the first six calendar months you reside in the nursing home. If you do not meet any of the criteria above, we will count the value of your home toward your asset limit unless you are malting a reasonable effort to sell it. Asset Assessments What is an asset assessment? An asset assessment is a list of all the assets owned by you and your spouse on a certain date. You must complete an Asset Assessment in order for your financial worker to determine how many assets your spouse can keep that will not count toward your asset limit. When should I complete an asset assessment? You must complete an Asset Assessment if you ask for MA payment for your nursing home costs or to receive EW services when all of the following are true: • You will be in the nursing home or will receive EW services for 30 uninterrupted days. • You are married. • Your spouse does not live in a nursing home. • Your spouse is not getting services covered by any home and community -based waiver programs, such as EW. You can ask for an Asset Assessment any time you meet the above conditions. You do not need to apply for MA. It is best to complete an Asset Assessment as soon as possible. The results can help you decide when to apply for MA. A financial worker will send you an estimate of- f] How many assets your spouse can keep. 91 How many assets you must spend before you are within the asset limits for NIA payment of your long -term care services. How do I get an Asset Assessment form? Contact your county agency and ask them for an Asset Assessment form (DHS- 3340). You can also get the form from the DHS website at www.dhs. state .mn.us /healthcare /applications. How many assets can my spouse keep? If you entered a nursing home or began receiving EW services on or after October 1, 1989, and applied for MA on or after January 1, 2011: a Your spouse can keep either $31,094 in assets or one -half of all the assets you both own, up to $109,560 in assets. What happens to my share of the assets? You must reduce your share of countable assets to within your asset limit before you can qualify for MA. If your spouse does not let you reduce your assets, MA may still pay for your nursing home or EW costs. However, the county will take legal action against your spouse. 4 Level of Care You are not eligible for MA payment of your nursing home costs or to receive services covered by EW if you do not meet the level of care requirements to reside in a nursing home. How do I know if I meet the level of care requirements to reside in a nursing home? People who enter a nursing home must receive an assessment to tell if they need a nursing facility level of care. If you are requesting EW services to allow you to reside in the community, you must have an assessment of your level of care requirements. A certified assessor will evaluate you to determine if you need a nursing facility level of care and to determine if you meet the program requirements for EW. Call your county agency to schedule an assessment if you would like to receive EW services. Dame Eauitv Limit You are not eligible for MA payment of your nursing home costs or to receive services covered by any home and community -based waiver program if the equity in your home is more than the home equity limit and you do not meet an exception. What is the limit on the amount of equity I can have in my home? The home equity limit is $506,000. This limit may increase each year. What are the exceptions to the home equity limit? We will not apply the home equity limit to you if one of these family members lives in the home: * Your.spouse e A child under age 21 ® A child who is blind or has a disability If you do not qualify for MA payment of your long- term care services because of the home equity limit and you do not have any other resources available to pay for your care, your county agency may be able to waive the home equity limit. Annuitv Reauirements You are not eligible for MA payment of your nursing home costs or to receive services covered by any home and community -based waiver program if you refuse to name DHS a preferred remainder beneficiary of certain annuities owned by you or your spouse. What is a "preferred remainder beneficiary ?" A "preferred remainder beneficiary" is the person who receives a death benefit from an annuity when a death benefit is available under the terms of the annuity contract. As a preferred remainder beneficiary, DHS may receive up to the total amount of money MA paid for your care. DHS is a secondary beneficiary if you name your spouse, your child under 18 or your disabled child of any age as a beneficiary of the annuity and the person is alive at the time of your death. Which annuities must I name DHS a preferred remainder beneficiary? You must name DHS a preferred remainder beneficiary for any annuity you or your spouse own where: ® An annuity transaction occurred on or after February 8, 2006, and a, The annuity provides for a death benefit and allows someone other than your spouse to be named a beneficiary. Transfers You are not eligible for MA payment of your nursing home costs or to receive services covered by any home and community -based waiver program if you have a penalty period because you or your spouse gave away income or assets. What is a transfer? Examples of giving away income and assets include if you: • Sell, trade or give away items of value or income for less than they are worth. • Refuse to accept items of value or income you can take, such as an inheritance or pension. Buy property or services for more than they are worth. i Put money into a trust unless it is for someone who is under age 65 and permanently disabled. You may incur a penalty period for any transfers made within the 60 months before the date you asked for MA to pay for your long -term care services or while you are receiving MA payment of long -term care services. How long is the penalty period? The penalty period depends on how much you and your spouse gave away or sold for less than its value. Your financial worker will: * Determine the value of each asset you and your spouse gave away or sold for less than its value. * Total the value of all those assets. ® Divide the total value by the average monthly amount MA pays for nursing home care. This amount is $5,340. The result is the number of months MA cannot pay for your long -term care services. Your financial worker will explain when the penalty period begins. If you do not qualify for MA payment of your long -term care services because of the penalty period and there are no alternatives for payment of your long -term care costs, your county agency may be able to waive the penalty period if your health and well -being are threatened. However, the county may sue the person to whom you gave the income or asset. Paying for your Nursing Home Care Do I contribute my income toward the cost of my care? Yes. Your monthly income helps pay for your care. Your financial worker will calculate your total income and subtract any allowable deductions. The amount that remains is the amount you are responsible to pay toward your nursing home costs. This is called your long -term care spenddown. Your financial worker will tell you how much of your income you must contribute toward your nursing home care. What deductions are allowed from my income? Program rules allow us to deduct: m An amount for your personal needs, such as for clothing or to pay your guardianship fees, if applicable. 6 0 An amount for the needs of your spouse, if applicable. ® An amount for the needs of your dependent family members, if applicable. ® An amount for your Medicare or other health insurance costs that someone else will not pay. ® An amount for any necessary medical expenses someone else will not pay. Will my spouse have to use part of his or her income to pay for my care? No. Your spouse will not have to use his or her income to contribute toward your nursing home costs. Do I always contribute the same amount to the nursing home each month? No. The amount you pay each month depends on the actual amount of your income and deductions in that month. When your income or deductions change, the amount you pay for your nursing home care changes. Your financial worker will tell you when you have to pay a different amount. P�ing f ®r EW Services Do I contribute my income toward the cost of my EW services? Yes. Your monthly income helps pay for your care. If your income is $2,022 or less, your financial worker will calculate your total income and subtract any allowable deductions. The amount that remains is the amount you are responsible to pay toward your EW services. This is called your waiver obligation. Your financial worker will tell you how much of your income you must contribute toward your EW services. If your income is above $2,022 your financial worker will calculate the amount you must contribute toward your MA costs following program rules. Your financial worker can explain these rules to you. What deductions are allowed from my income? Program rules allow us to deduct: 19 An amount for your personal needs, such as an amount to meet your need to reside in the community. ® An amount for the needs of your spouse, if applicable. * An amount for the needs of your dependent family members, if applicable. El An amount for your Medicare or other health insurance costs that someone else will not pay. n An amount for any necessary medical expenses someone else will not pay. Liens and Estate Claims Will AAA► file a claim against my estate or a lien against my property? The state or county may file a claim against your estate or a lien against your interest in real property to recover the cost of medical services paid by MA. The state may file a claim against your estate or a lien against your interest in real property if you received: ® MA when you were age 55 or older. o MA when you were under 55 and lived in a medical institution for six months or more. Liens can be filed against: ® Your life estate interest in real property. e Real property that you own by yourself. ® Real property that you own with someone else. If you own property with another person, the lien is only against your share. You should talk with a lawyer or advisor if you have any questions. Covered Services What services does MA cover? ® Alcohol and drug treatment ® Chiropractic care ® Dental care (limited for non - pregnant adults) m Doctor /clinic visits o Emergency room care (ER) Eyeglasses Family planning services ® Hearing aids Home care • Hospice care • Immunizations ® Inpatient hospital ® Lab and X-ray ® Medical equipment ® Medical transportation (access, ambulance and special) ® Medication Therapy Management Services ® Mental health care ® Nursing homes and ICF -MR facilities ® Outpatient surgery Prescription drugs (Note: MA cannot pay for any drugs in the Medicare prescription drug benefit if you have Medicare.) Rehabilitative therapy Should I keep my health or dental insurance? Tell your financial worker if you have other health or dental insurance. Sometimes MA will pay your premiums for you. Be sure to talk to your financial worker before you stop your health or dental insurance. Can the nursing home charge me for extra services in the nursing home? A nursing home may charge you a fee for some services not covered by MA, such as cable TV or a private phone. You do not have to get these extra services. A nursing home cannot charge you extra for a service that it must offer to keep its license. For example, licensed nursing homes cannot charge you when they do your laundry. Will MA pay for a private room? Usually MA will not pay for a private room. Private room rates are often higher than the MA rates. This means that if you are in a private room and start getting MA, you may be asked to change rooms or to pay the extra cost. Some medical conditions allow you to keep a private room when you get MA. This is determined on an individual basis. Contact the Office of Ombudsman for Older Americans at (651) 431 -2555 or (800) 651 -3591 for help if you feel you need a private room. Minnesota law lets a person pay the difference between the MA rate and the cost for a private room. You can pay this amount from your $3,000 in assets, or it can be paid by your spouse, or by someone other than your spouse. Be sure to find out if MA will pay the higher rate before you agree to an extra charge. If I am on MA, can I keep my room if I am away from the nursing home? You can keep your room if: a You are in the hospital for no more than 18 days at a time. ® You are away for no more than 36 days a year for therapeutic leave, such as vacations or home visits. Can a nursing home refuse to admit me or treat me differently because I get MA? Some nursing homes in Minnesota do not get paid by MA. These facilities can refuse admission to someone who is on MA. Ask your county agency or nursing home ombudsman for a list of facilities that do not take MA patients. Nursing homes that get paid by MA cannot: ® Limit admissions due to a person's ability to pay. ® Limit the number of people on MA admitted to their facility. a Have separate living areas based on payment status. ® Offer "special services" to some residents and not to others. 'Can I move to another nursing home without losing my MA? Yes, you can keep your MA and move to any nursing home that is paid by MA if the new nursing home has a bed for the level of care you need. What types of services are available through EW? El Adult day service ® Chore services n Companion services * Consumer - directed community supports © Home health aides © Home - delivered meals a Homemaker services s Licensed community residential services (customized living services or 24 -hour customized living services, family foster care, residential care) ® Environmental accessibility adaptations ® Personal care assistant ® Respite care ® Skilled nursing ® Specialized equipment and supplies ® Training for informal caregivers ® Transitional supports ® Transportation 8 This information is available in alternative formats to individuals with disabilities by calling (651) 431 -2670 or (800) 657 -3739. TTY users can call through Minnesota Relay at (800) 627-3529. For Speech - to- Speech, call (877) 627 -3848. For additional assistance with legal rights and protections for equal access to human services programs, contact your agency's ADA coordinator. Attention. If you want free help translating this information, ask your worker or call the number below for your language. (L:JU_la.J *3A a.�_y, Lfi avL,., car-L.,- u�,l 131 1- 800- 358 -0377 ��►I i'�1gT� 6�. l�t�d�P 'l��'4��.jlt,�t�.�t16'll��l lr e�61J�6�1FGU`� 1. -88 &468- 3787.1 Paznja..Ako vam je potrebna besplatna pomod za.prevod ove- informacije, pitajte vageg radnika ili nazovite.1 -888 -234 -3785. Ceeb toom, Yog koj xav tau kev pab txhais cov xov no tau koj dawb, nug koj tus neeg lis dej num (.worker) lossis hu 1- 888 -486 -8377. luio nqrt^wc@nlimn 1- 888487 -8251. Hubaddhu...Yoo akka odeeffannoon. kun sii hiikamu gargaarsa tolaa feeta We, hojjataa kee gaafaddhu ykn lakkoofsa kana bilbili 1:=8.88- 234 -3798. BH- Hmaxxe:: ecru Bank HywHa 6ecnnaTxax I70MOII;li B 1 peBo,ge 3TOP4 Hij( opmagmx,. 666aTHTecb.x caoeMy couxanbxoMy pa60THxtry FMIT1103BOHIM no cnegyiomeMy'Tenec oHy: 1- 888 -562- 5.877: Ogow. Haddii aad dooneyso in lagaa kaalmeeyo tat jamadda macluumaadkani oo lacag la'aan. ah,_ weydii hawl- wadeenkaaga ama wac lambarkan 1- 888-547 =8829 Afenci6n. Si desea recibir,asistencia graMita Para traduciresta inf6rmaci6n, consulte a:su r trabajador. o flame. al 1 =888- 428 - 3438. -. Chu: Y. Neu quy A 'can dtcli thong° tin nay mien. pht, xm.gol rihari vier x&h6i ctia quy vi: o hoac goi so 1:- 888 = 554 - 8759.. DHS- 5357 -ENG 12.10 Minnesota Department of Human Services Elderly Waiver Program What is the Elderly Waiver Program? The Elderly Waiver (EW) program funds home- and community -based services for people age 65 and older who are eligible for Medical Assistance (MA) and require the level of care provided in a nursing home, but choose to reside in the community. The Minnesota Department of Human Services operates the EW program under a federal waiver to Minnesota's Medicaid State Plan. Counties, tribal entities and health plan partners administer the program. What types of services are available? Covered services include: • Adult day service • Chore services • Companion services • Consumer - directed community supports • Home health aides • Home - delivered meals • Homemaker services • Licensed community residential services (customized living services or 24 -hour customized living services, family foster care, residential care) • Environmental accessibility adaptations • Personal care assistant ■ Respite care • Skilled nursing • Specialized equipment and supplies • Training for informal caregivers • Transitional supports • Transportation Who is eligible? • Those eligible for the Elderly Waiver program are 65 or older, eligible for Medical As and need nursing home level of care as determined by the Long -Term Care Consultation process. • The EW service cost for an individual cannot be greater than the estimated nursing home cost for that same individual. How many people? How many dollars? In fiscal year (FY) 2010, the Elderly Waiver program served 26,779* recipients through fee - for - service (FFS) and managed care options (Minnesota Senior Health Option or MSHO and Minnesota Senior Care Plus- MSC +). The total dollars spent on waiver services was $302,077,277. ** wwwAhs.state.mn.us Page 1 of 5 256B.0915, Minnesota Statutes 2007 Legislature Home I Links to the World I Help I Advanced Search r Minnesota Office of the Revisor :of Statutes House I Senate I Joint Departments and Commissions I .Bill Search and Status I Statutes, Laws, and Rules Minnesota Statutes Table of Cha tp ers Chapter 2568 Table of Contents 2566.0915, Minnesota, Statutes 2007 Copyright © 2007 by the Office of Revisor'of statutes, State of Minnesota. 256B.0915 MEDICAID WAIVER FOR ELDERLY SERVICES. Subdivision 1. Authority. The commissioner is authorized to apply for a home and community-based services waiver for the elderly, authorized under section 1915(c) of the Social Security Act, in order to obtain fed eral. financial participatio n to expand the availability of services for persons who are eligible for medical assistance. The commissioner may apply for additional waivers or pursue other federal financial participation which is advantageous to the state for funding home care services for the frail elderly who are eligible'for medical assistance. The provision of waivered services to, elderly and disabled medical assistance recipients must comply with the criteria for service definitions and provider standards approved in the waiver. Subd. la. Elderly waiver case management services. (a) Elderly case management services under the home and community-based services waiver for elderly individuals are available from providers meeting qualification requirements and the standards specified in subdivision lb. Eligible recipients may choose any qualified provider of elderly case management services. Case management services assist individuals who receive waiver services in gaining access; to needed waiver and other state plan services, as well as needed medical, social, educational; and other services regardless of the funding source for the services to which access is gained. A case aide shall provide assistance to the case manager in carrying out administrative activities of the case in function. The case aide may not assume responsibilities that require professional judgment including assessments, reassess►rrents, and care plan development. The case manager is responsible for providing oversight of the case aide. Case managers shall be responsible for ongoing monitoring of the provision of services included in the individual's plan of care. Case managers shall initiate and oversee the process of assessment and reassessment of the individual's care and review plan of care at intery als specified in the federally approved waiver plan. (b) The county of service or tribe must.provide access to and arrange for case management services. County of service has the meaning given it in Minnesota Rules, part 9505.0015, subpart 11. Subd. lb. Provider qualifications and standards. The commissioner must enroll qualified providers of elderly case management services under the home and community-based waiver for the elderly under section 1915(c) of.the Social Security Act. The enrollment process shall ensure the provider's ability to meet the qualification requirements and standards in this subdivision and other federal and state requirements of this service. An elderly case management provider is an enrolled medical assistance provider who is determined by the commissioner to have all of the following characteristics: (l) the demonstrated capacity and experience to provide the components of case management to coordinate and link community resources needed by the eligible population; (2) administrative capacity and experience in serving the target population for whom it will provide services and in ensuring quality of services under state and federal requirements; (3) a financial management system that provides accurate documentation of services and costs under state and federal requirements; . (4) the capacity to document and maintain individual case records under state and federal requirements; and (5) the lead agency may allow a case manager employed by the lead agency to delegate _ ... GFR nQ1 5 8/2/2011 256B.0915, Minnesota Statutes 2007 certain aspects of the case management activity to another individual employed by the lead agency provided there is oversight of the individual by the case manager. The case manager may not delegate those aspects which require professional judgment including assessments, reassessments, and care plan development. Lead agencies include counties, health plan s, and federally recognized tribes who authorize services under this section. Subd. lc. [Repealed by amendment, 2007 c 147 art 7 s 15] Subd. I d. Posteligibility treatment of income and resources for elderly waiver. Notwithstanding the provisions of section 256B.056, the commissioner shall make the following amendment to the medical assistance elderly waiver program effective July 1, 1999, or upon federal approval, whichever is later. A recipient's maintenance needs will be an amount equal to the Minnesota supplemental aid equivalent rate as defined in section 256I 03 subdivision 5, plus the medical assistance personal needs allowance as defined in section 25613.35 subdivision 1, paragraph (a), when applying posteligibility treatment of income rules to the gross income of elderly waiver recipients, except for individuals whose income is in excess of the special income standard according to Code of Federal Regulations, title 42, section 435.236. Recipient maintenance needs shall be adjusted under this provision each July 1. Subd. 2. spousal impoverishment policies. The commissioner shall apply: (1) the spousal impoverishment criteria as authorized under United States Code, title 42, section 1396r -5, and as implemented in sections 256B4O5 5, 256B.05 a, and 2561305 ; (2) the personal needs allowance permitted in section 2561305 5; and (3) an amount equivalent to the group residential housing rate as set by section 256I.03, subdivision 5 , and according to the approved federal waiver and medical assistance state plan. Subd. 3. Limits of cases. The number of medical assistance waiver recipients that a lead agency may serve must be allocated according to the number of medical assistance waiver cases open on July I of each fiscal year. Additional recipients may be served with the approval of the commissioner. Subd. 3a.[Repealed, I Sp2001 c 9 art 3 s 76; art 4 s 34] Subd. 3a. Elderly waiver cost limits. (a) The monthly limit for the cost of waivered services to an individual elderly waiver client shall be the weighted average monthly nursing facility rate of the case in ix resident class to which the elderly waiver client would be assigned under Minnesota Rules, pants 9549.0050 to 9549.0059, less the recipient's maintenance needs allowance as described in subdivision Id, paragraph (a), until the first day of the state fiscal year in which the resident assessment system as described in section 256B.437 for nursing home rate determ ination is implemented. Effective on the first day of the state fiscal year in which the resident assessment system as described in section 25613.431 for nursing home rate determ ination is implemented and the first day of each subsequent state fiscal year, the monthly limit for the cost of waivered services to an individual elderly waiver client shall be the rate of the case mix resident class to which the w aiver client would be assigned under Minnesota Rules, parts 9549.0050 to 9549.0059, in effect on the last day of the previous state fiscal year, adjusted by the greater of any legislatively adopted hone and community-based services percentage rate increase or the average statewide percentage increase in nursing facility payment rates. (b) If extended medical supplies and equipment or environmental modifications are or will be purchased for an elderly waiver client, the costs may be prorated for up to 12 consecutive months beginning with the month of purchase. If the monthly cost of a recipient's waivered services exceeds the monthly limit established in paragraph (a), the annual cost of all waivered services shall be determined. In this event, the annual cost of all waivered services shall not exceed 12 times the monthly limit of waivered services as described in paragraph (a). Subd. 3b. [Repealed, 1 Sp2001 c 9 art 3 s 76; art 4 s 341 Subd. 3b. Cost limits for elderly waiver applicants who reside in a nursing facility. (a) For a person who is a nursing facility resident at the time of requesting a determination of eligibility for elderly waivered services, a monthly conversion limit for the cost of elderly waivered services may be requested. The monthly conversion limit for the cost of elderly Page 2 of 5 .. . I I 1 . n`___ __.. 0...... . «— niiwani'Rrn11Yl'1= 7.S�lR.n7� S 0/2/2011 Pages of 256B.0915, Minnesota, Statutes 2007 waiver services shall be the resident class assigned under Minnesota Rules, parts 9549.0050 to 9549.0059, for that resident in the nu rsing facility where the resident currently resides until July l of the state fiscal year in which the resident assessment system as described in section 25613.438 for nursing home rate determination is implemented. Effective on July 1 of the state fiscal year in which the resident assessment system as described in section 256B.438 for nursing home rate determination is implemented, the monthly conversion limit for the cost of elderly waiver services shall be the per diem nursing facility rate as determined by the resident. assessment system as described in section 25613.438 for that resident in the nursing facility where the resident currently resides multiplied by 365 and divided by 12, less_the recipient's maintenance needs allowance as described in subdivision id. The initi ally. approved conversion rate may be adjusted by the greater of any subsequent legislatively adopted home and community-based services percentage rate increase or the average statewide percentage increase in nursing facility payment rates. The limit under this subdivision only applies to persons discharged from a nursing facility after a m inimum 30 7day stay and found eligible for waivered services on or after July 1, 1997. For conversions - from the nursing home to the elderly waiver with consumer directed community support services, the conversion rate limit is equal to the nursing facility rate reduced by a percentage equal:to the percentage difference between the consumer directed services budget limit that would'be assigned according to the federally approved waiver plan and the corresponding community case mix cap, but not to exceed 50 percent. (b) The following costs must be included in determining the total monthly costs for the waiver client: (1) cost of all waivered services, including extended medical supplies and equipment and environmental modifications and adaptations; and (2) cost of skilled nursing, home health aide, and personal care services reimbursable by medical assistance. Subd. 3c.[Repealed, 1 Sp2001 c 9 art 3 s 76; art 4 s 34] Subd. 3c. Service approval and contracting provisions. (a) Medical assistance funding for skilled nursing services, private duty nursing, home health aide, and personal care sery ices for waiver recipients must be approved by the case manager and included in the individual care plan. (b) A lead agency is not required to contract with a provider of supplies and equipment if the monthly cost of the supplies and equipment is less than $250. Subd. 3d. Adult foster care rate. The adult foster care rate shall be considered a difficu Ity of care payment and shall not include room and board. The adult foster care service rate shall be negotiated between the lead agency and the foster care provider. The elderly waiver payment for the foster care service in combination with the pay ment for all other elderly waiver services, including case management, must not exceed the limit specified in subdivision 3a, paragraph (a). Subd. 3e. Customized' living service rate. (a) Payment for customized living services shall be a monthly rate negotiated and authorized by the lead agency within the parameters established by the commissioner. The payment agreement must delineate the services that have been customized for each recipient and specify the amount of each service to be provided. The lead agency shall ensure that there is a documented need for all services authorized. Customized --� living services must not include rent or raw food costs. The negotiated payment rate must be based on services to be provided. Negotiated rates must not exceed payment rates for comparable elderly waiver or medical assistance services and must reflect economies of scale. (b) The individualized monthly negotiated payment for customized living services shall not exceed the no nfederal share, in effect o n July 1 of the state fiscal year for which the rate limit is being calculated, of the greater of either the statewide or any of the geographic groups' weighted average monthly nursing facility rate of the case mix resident class to which the elderly waiver eligible client would be assigned under Minnesota Rules, pails 9549.0050 to 9549.0059, less the maintenance needs allowance as described in subdivision 1 d, paragraph (a), until the July 1 of the state fiscal year in which the res ident assessment system as described in section 25613.437 for . nursing home rate determination is implemented. Effective on July 1 of the state Fiscal year in which the resident assessment system as described in section 256B.437 for nursing home rate_ ,,,,P.,,t,G:nrrm =2:5fiB.0915 8/2/2011 256B.0915, Minnesota Statutes 2007 determination is implemented and July I of each subsequent state fiscal year, the individualized monthly negotiated payment for the services described in this clause shall not exceed the limit described in this clause which was in effect on June 30 of the previous state fiscal year and which has been adjusted by the greater of any legislatively adopted home and community-based services cost -of- living percentage increase or any legislatively adopted statewide percent rate increase for nursing facilities. (c) Customized living services are delivered by a provider licensed by the Department of Health as a class A or class F home care provider and provided in a building that is registered as a housing with services establishment under chapter 144D. Subd. 3f. Individual service rates; expenditure forecasts. (a) The lead agency shall negotiate individual service rates with vendors and may authorize payment for actual costs up to the lead agency's current approved rate. Persons or agencies must be employed by or under a contract with the lead agency or the public health nursing agency of the local board of health in order to receive funding under the elderly waiver program, except as a provider of supplies and equipment when the monthly cost of the supplies and equipment is less than $250. (b) Reimbursement for the medical assistance recipients under the approved waiver shall be made fi•om the medical assistance account through the invoice processing procedures of the department's Medicaid Management Information System (MMIS), only with the approval of the client's case manager. The budget for the state share of the Medicaid expenditures shall be forecasted with the medical assistance budget, and shall be consistent with the approved waiver. Subd. 3g. Service rate limits; state assumption of costs. (a) To improve access to community services and eliminate payment disparities between the alternative care program and the elderly waiver, the commissioner shall establish statewide maximum service rate lim its and eliminate lead agency- specific service rate limits. (b) Effective July 1, 2001, for service rate limits, except those described or defined in subdivisions 3d and 3e, the rate limit for each service shall be the greater of the alternative care statewide maximum rate or the elderly waiver statewide maximum rate. (c) Lead agencies may negotiate individual service rates with vendors for actual costs up to the statewide maximum service rate limit. Subd. 3h. Service rate limits; 24 -hour customized living services. The payment rates for 24 -hour customized living services is a monthly rate negotiated and authorized by the lead agency within the parameters established by the commissioner of human services. The payment agreement must delineate the services that have been customized for each recipient and specify the amount of each service to be provided. The lead agency shall ensure that there is a documented need for all services authorized. The lead agency shall not authorize 24 -hour customized living services unless there is a documented need for 24 -hour supervision. For purposes of this section, "24 -hour supervision" means that the recipient requires assistance due to needs related to one or more of the following; (1) intermittent assistance with toileting or transferring; (2) cognitive or behavioral issues; (3) a medical condition that requires clinical monitoring; or (4) other conditions or needs as defined by the commissioner of human services. The lead agency shall ensure that the frequency and mode of supervision of the recipient and the qualifications of staff providing supervision are described and meet the needs of the recipient. Customized liv ing services must not include rent or raw food costs. The negotiated payment rate for 24 -hour customized living services must be based on services to be provided. Negotiated rates must not exceed payment rates for comparable elderly waiver or medical assistance services and must reflect economies of scale. The individually negotiated 24 -hour customized living payments, in combination with the payment for other elderly waiver services, including case management, must not exceed the recipient's community budget cap specified in subdivision 3a. Subd. 4. Termination notice. The case manager must give the individual a ten -day written notice of any denial, reduction, or termination of waivered services. Subd. 5. Assessments and reassessments for waiver clien ts. Each client shall receive Page 4 oT 11 ........,,.. n,;. ,i,.Ptr „t,,,1,,, ?tvne.= .q&vear= current &num= 256B.0915 8/2/2011 Susan Howl Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, I --------------- With regard to the Living Waters development plat/subdivision application to be considered by the City Council tonight, I request that the Council consider Edina Ordinance 810.11, Subd 1, particularly subsections A, B, G, and K. 810.11 Guidelines and Criteria for Evaluating Plats and Subdivisions. Subd. 1 Considerations. The Commission in reviewing proposed .plats and subdivisions and in determining its recommendation to the Council, and the Council in determining whether to approve or disapprove of any plat or subdivision, may consider, among other matters, the following: A. The impact of the proposed plat or subdivision, and proposed development, on the character and symmetry of the neighborhood as evidenced and indicated by, but not limited to, the following matters: 1. The suitability to the size and shape of the lots in the proposed plat or subdivision relative to the size and shape of lots in the neighborhood; and 2. The compatibility of the size, shape, location and arrangement of the lots in the proposed plat or subdivision with the proposed density and intended use of the site and the density and use of lots in the neighborhood. B. The impact of the proposed plat or subdivision, and proposed development, on the environment, including but not limited to, topography, steep slopes, vegetation, naturally occurring lakes, ponds and streams, susceptibility of the site to erosion and sedimentation, susceptibility of the:site to flooding and water storage needs on and from the site. C. The consistency of the proposed plat or subdivision, and proposed development, and compliance by the proposed plat or subdivision, and the proposed development, with the policies, objectives, and goals of the Comprehensive Plan. D. The compliance of the proposed plat or subdivision, and the proposed development with the policies, objectives, goals and requirements of Section 850 of this Code including, without limitation, the lot size provisions and the Floodplain Overlay District provisions of Section 850 of this Code. i E. The impact of the proposed plat or subdivision, and proposed development on the health, safety and general welfare of the public. F. The relationship of the design of the site, or the improvements proposed and the conflict of such design or improvements, with any easements of record or on the ground. G. The relationship of lots in the proposed plat or subdivision to existing streets and the adequacy and safety of ingress to and egress from such lots from and to existing streets. H. The�adequacy of streets in the proposed plat or subdivision, and the conformity with existing and planned streets and highways in surrounding areas. Streets in the proposed plat or subdivision shall be deemed inadequate if designed or located so as to prevent or deny public street access to adjoining properties, it being the policy of the City to avoid landlocked tracts, parcels or lots. I. The suitability of street grades in relation to the grades of lots and existing or future extension of the City's water, storm and sanitary sewer systems. J. The adequacy and availability of access by police, fire, ambulance and other life safety vehicles to all proposed improvements to be developed on the proposed plat or subdivision. K. Whether the physical characteristics of the property, including, without limitation, topography,, vegetation, susceptibility to erosion or siltation, susceptibility to .flooding; u' as a natural recovery and ponding area for storm water, and potential disturbance of slopes with a grade of i 8 percent or more, are such that the property is not"suitable for the type of development or use proposed. L. Whether development within the proposed plat or subdivision will cause the disturbance of more'than 25 percent of the total area in such plat or subdivision containing slopes exceeding 18 percent. M. Whether the proposed plat or subdivision, or the improvements proposed to be . placed thereon are likely to cause substantial environmental damage. For your convenience, I have also attached a link to a previous development matter in 2004 which mentioned Ordinance 810.1 1, one of only two previous instances where the minutes mentioned this ordinance, according to a search for 8 10. 11 on the City's website: httn: / /www.ci.edina .mn.us /eitvcouncil /CitvCouncil MeetinizMinutes/2004030IReiz.htm In the above link a subdivision project in Indian Hills was defeated by the City Council despite Planning Commission approval because the project did not fit with the character and symmetry of the neighborhood: Section 810.11 of the Subdivision Ordinance provides guidelines and criteria for the City Council to consider when reviewing proposed subdivisions: Among the considerations set forth are: A. The impact of the proposed plat or subdivision, and proposed development, on the character and symmetry of the neighborhood as evidenced and indicated by, but not limited-to, the following matters: 1. The suitability of the size and shape of the lots in the proposed plat or subdivision relative to the size and shape of lots in the neighborhood; and 2. The compatibility of the size, shape, location and arrangement of the lots in the proposed plat or subdivision with the proposed density and use of the lots in the neighborhood." The lots in the proposed subdivision are incompatible with the character and symmetry of the lots in the surrounding neighborhood. Member-Hovland voted against the subdivision. Member Housch was the only City Council member that voted in favor of the subdivision. Thank you kindly for your attention to this matter. Kent B. Gravelle, 5609 Tracy Ave., Edina, MN 55436, (952) 922 -8596 3 MINUTES ' OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION JUNE 28, 2011 7:03 PM CALL TO ORDER V Vice Chair Finsness called the meeting to order at 7:03 PM. I/. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bigbee, Cashmore, Finsness, Mayer, Newell, Seidman, Stanton and Winnick. III. MEETING AGENDA EDITED AND APPROVED Commissioner Finsness requested an additional agenda item be placed under Reports & Recommendations, becoming VI. G. Service Dogs in Condominium Associations. Motion by Commissioner Winnick and seconded by Commissioner Stanton approving the meeting agenda as edited. Ayes: Bigbee, Cashmore, Finsness, Mayer, Newell, Seidman, Stanton and Winnick Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA ADOPTED Motion by Commissioner Bigbee and seconded by Commissioner Seidman approving the consent agenda as follows: W.A. Approve regular meeting minutes of May 24, 2011. Ayes: Bigbee, Cashmore, Finsness, Mayer, Newell, Seidman, Stanton and Winnick Motion carried. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT Two visitors introduced themselves: Sue Plaster, a member of the community who is interested in diversity and intercultural communications; and Bevlin Jennings, a student at Edina High School who is interested in serving on HRRC. Vl. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS VI.A. MAYOR'S MEMBERSHIP ON THE COALITION REGARDING IMMIGRATION REFORM ENDORSED The "Partnership for a New American Economy" is a coalition of mayors and business leaders who choose to make the case that immigration reform is an economic imperative. Mayor Hovland had asked the Commission to look into this coalition and conclude whether or not he should become a member. There is neither financial nor time commitment for Mayor Hovland to join, and the Commissioners opened up discussion on the matter. Commissioners Seidman and Stanton stated that the information from New York City's Mayor was too vague and did not provide enough detail. In addition, Commissioner Stanton pointed out that there is a 9.1% unemployment rate now and that we should be vested in "growing" our own people first. He indicated that he is not comfortable about endorsing this coalition. Commissioner Bigbee explained that the United States does need a different immigration policy and that this coalition seems like a movement in the right direction. The coalition is trying to get public conversation going. It will be a good thing to get first -hand information from the Mayor. There is evidence that a number of immigrants work within the community. N A concern was raised that this coalition was about economics and lower pay rates for immigrants. Commissioner Newell stated that this is not necessarily true, as the form entitled "Immigrant Petition for Alien Workers" protects both the immigrant and the employer in the immigrant worker's process of becoming a permanent resident in the United States. The form is filed by the employer on behalf of a foreign worker. Commissioner Finsness reported that this coalition is a group created to investigate and explore the need for immigration reform by looking at the laws and raising public awareness. As a member, the Mayor could monitor the progress and keep the Commission updated. This would be a great opportunity for HRRC to learn about immigration. Commissioner Bigbee made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Mayer, to recommend that Mayor Hovland join the "Mayor's Coalition Regarding Immigration Reform" and that he provides the Commission timely updates in his involvement. Ayes: Bigbee, Finsness, Mayer, Newell Nays: Cashmore, Seidman, Winnick Abstain: Stanton Motion carried. VI.B. LMHRC GLBT RESOLUTION ENDORSED An amendment to the Minnesota Constitution was proposed that would ban the legal recognition of same -sex relationships within the State of Minnesota. As a result, the League of Minnesota Human Rights Commissions (LMHRC) drafted a resolution to share with the press and its own membership declaring opposition to the amendment. The Commissioners reviewed this resolution and opened up discussion. Commissioner Bigbee shared that the resolution had been created by the League two years ago and was recently revised. He suggested that the Commission recommend the City Council's statement of opposition to the constitutional amendment. Commissioners Mayer and Stanton questioned HRRC's role and whether it could endorse something from the League. Commissioner Stanton supported the resolution but suggested that it could be edited for the sake of new resolutions from HRRC and the City Council. Commissioner Finsness explained that the resolution covers HRRC because of its membership under the League's umbrella. She indicated that the City Council could have its own resolution as well. Commissioner Mayer made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Newell, to table the endorsement of the League's resolution. The motion failed with only one aye. Commissioners Bigbee and Winnick remarked that the Commission could stand by and watch the events or take action. Commissioner Winnick encouraged the Commissioners to make a public statement by endorsing the League's resolution and encouraging the City Council to do the same thing. Commissioner Stanton made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Cashmore, to endorse the League's resolution to oppose changing the Minnesota constitution in order to ban the legal recognition of same -sex relationships and unions, and at its July meeting the Commission will investigate a recommendation that the City Council could also support the opposition. Ayes: Bigbee, Cashmore, Finsness, Mayer, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick Motion carried. VI.0 APPOINTMENT OF COMMISSIONER TO POST UPDATES ON TWITTER TABLED Because the Minnesota Department of Human Rights has been using Twitter to provide information to the public, HRRC could send e-mail updates and summaries to them to be included with their human rights related news on Twitter. If HRRC information was to be posted with the State's news, it could also be forwarded to the City of Edina's Twitter site. Commissioner Cashmore made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Winnick, to table the appointment and to invite the Communication's Director, Jennifer Bennerotte, to a Commission meeting to discuss communication tools. Ayes: Bigbee, Cashmore, Finsness, Mayer, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick Motion carried. VI.D. RESOLUTION APPROVED REGARDING STAFF CHANGES TO THE CITY'S WEBSITE HISTORY Commissioner Winnick had several meetings with Joyce Repya, Associate Planner, and Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications Director, to draft a revision to the history of the Edina Country Club District which would include the facts about realtors turning away potential buyers interested in the Country Club District who were Jewish or members of certain other minorities. This revision would be within the Heritage Landmarks section of the City's website and would also reveal the history regarding the early covenants and private deed restrictions prohibiting non - Caucasians from ownership. Due to the diligence of Ms. Repya, the changes were quickly made, providing accurate information of historical value. Commissioner Bigbee made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Cashmore, to present a resolution of appreciation to Joyce Repya for her effort and generosity in working to update the City's website with significant historical information. . Ayes: Bigbee, Cashmore, Finsness, Mayer, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick Motion carried. VI. E. CREATION OF A TASK FORCE APPROVED TO DEVELOP A PROCESS FOR THE SUBMISSION OF SPONSORSHIP REQUESTS AND CRITERIA /GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATION In the event that an organization comes before HRRC requesting financial support and time /services for an educational endeavor, a process and criteria /guidelines need to be developed and in place. Commissioner Cashmore made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Newell, to create a Commission task force to develop a process for submission and criteria /guidelines for evaluating sponsorship requests. Ayes: Bigbee, Cashmore, Finsness, Mayer, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick Motion carried. The following Commissioners agreed to serve on the task force and submit a report to the Commission in October: Bigbee, Finsness, Seidman. Commissioner Bigbee agreed to chair the task force. VI.F. EVENTS DEBRIEF TABLED UNTIL THE NEXT COMMISSION MEETING With the Commission Chair being unable to attend the meeting, it had been suggested that feedback be sent to the staff liaison by July 18`h regarding the two events — "Reflections on Bullying" and "Days of Remembrance." The liaison would then turn these suggestions into a document for discussion at the July Commission meeting, with all comments being confidential. Commissioner Seidman submitted a form entitled "Event Review & Future Planning" to consider as a tool for evaluation. Commissioner Mayer was concerned that the timing is not good and that it is a little too late for accurate evaluations. A constructive process would have been to ask four questions about each event and have these as topics of discussion. He recommended that, at the very least, the chair of each event should produce a summary. And for the future, participants could be surveyed at the events. Commissioner Bigbee remarked that the Commission needs to get this work done as soon as possible by figuring out how to gather quick information. Commissioner Finsness recommended that a professional survey be created for the Commission to analyze the information. She shared that Commissioner Seidman's form would be useful right after an event for people who worked directly on the event and would be excellent for future planning. Regarding a survey, Commissioner Finsness suggested that an on -line survey be created for each event for the Commissioners to complete by July 201h for discussion at the July Commission meeting. In addition, the survey could be sent to the task force members who are not Commissioners —Dick Crockett, Heather Haen Anderson, Rachel Pream Grenier and the GSA student leaders. It might also be helpful to have a survey for people who attended the events. Commissioner Cashmore made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Mayer, to table the discussion about events' debriefing until the next meeting. Ayes: Bigbee, Cashmore, Finsness, Mayer, Newell, Seidman, Stanton, Winnick Motion carried. Commissioner Mayer offered to send out guidelines — "Personal Post Mortems " —to help prepare for debriefing at the next Commission meeting. VI.G. SERVICE DOGS IN CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATIONS DISCUSSED Commissioner Finsness reported that she had learned about a condominium putting restrictions on a resident using a service dog because there was no documentation of need. At this time, Commissioner Finsness had received no updated information, and she felt that the bylaws of the condominium association should be reviewed. VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS No correspondence or petitions were received since the last Commission meeting. Vlll. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS There were no comments. IX. STAFF COMMENTS There were no comments. X. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Commission Agenda, 1St Vice Chair Finsness declared the meeting adjourned at 9:15 PM. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by HRRC, July 26, 2011. Susan Howl, HRRC Staff Liaison Lisa Finsness, HRRC 1St Vice Chair MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION HELD AT CITY HALL June 9, 2011 7:05 P.M. I. Call to Order Chair Latham called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. II. Roll Call Answering roll call were Members Gubrud, lyer, Kata, Kostuch, Paterlini, Pro nove, Sierks, Thompson, Zarrin, and Chair Latham. Absent: Members Risser and Tucker Staff Present: Jane Timm and Jesse Struve III. Approval of Meeting Agenda Agenda was approved as written. IV. Adoption of Consent Agenda. Motion made by Member Thompson and seconded by Member Gubrud approving the consent agenda. V. Community Comment. No one appeared for comment. Resident David Vandongen, address unknown, was there to observe. VI. Report/Recommendations A. Working Group Members. Motion made by Member Gubrud and seconded by Member Paterlini to approve Todd Doroff, Laura Eaton, and Robert Skrentner to the Water Quality Working Group and delete Ryan Wilson from the group. Motion carried unanimously. B. City Website. Member Paterlini gave the Commission an update about her participation on the Website Group with Jennifer Bennerotte. Member Paterlini sent some ideas to Ms. Bennerotte on behalf of the EEC. They have not met as a group yet. C. Recycling & Solid Waste Working Group. Chair Latham reported that the Recycling and Solid Waste Working Group did not meet in May. 1. The working group will be attending the St Paul District Roof Top Solar Installation Tour on June 23, 2011. 2. There was a discussion about the proposed amendment to proposed Section 1300.09 of the Edina City Code to require the reporting of commercial Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) as well as residential MSW. Motion made by Member Zarrin and seconded by Member Thompson to remove the word "residential" from the Edina proposed ordinance Section 1300.09, Collection and Disposal of Refuse and Recyclables. Motion carried unanimously. D. Eco Tour. Chair Latham gave an update on EEC's 7 -31 -11 Eco Yard and Garden Tour and asked the commissioners to recruit working group members to sign up to volunteer that day. E. Education and Outreach Working Group. Member Thompson reported for the Education and Outreach Working Group. He gave an update on the survey to be given to the Edina School District Principals. There was a discussion about the best and fastest way to get articles published in the Sun Current. Staff Liaison Struve will check with Jennifer Bennerotte to see what articles regarding energy savings have been written on the Public Works building and what articles could still be written. Member Pronove gave an update on a hydration system (drinking fountain and fill up station)they are collecting money (fund raising) to have installed at the high school. F. Water Quality Working Group. Chair Latham gave an update on the Water Quality Working Group in the absence of Member Tucker. 1. There was a discussion about the proposed Coal Tar Sealer Ordinance. The commission reviewed the proposed ordinance. There were many questions about how and why the ordinance came to be. It was decided to table discussion and approval until next month when Member Tucker would be available. Motion made by Member Kostuch and seconded by Member Gubrud to table the proposed Coal Tar Sealer Ordinance approval until July 2011 meeting. Motion carried unanimously. 2. There was a discussion about the Bluestar Certification website. Mr. Struve will contact the website to see if there is a read -only access otherwise he will print the information, scan the information and send it out to commissioners. 3. Chair Latham gave an update on the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System presentation. Mr. Struve will give the presentation to the Water Quality Working Group in the .future. G. Procurement. Member Kostuch updated the commission regarding his meeting with staff. He informed the members that a Purchasing Committee had been established and the Purchasing Committee would be reviewing the policy. H. Energy Working Group. 1. Mr. Struve gave an update on the solar RFP. He stated that McKinstry Company had toured several city buildings. The Energy Working Group was concerned that it had not been involved in the RFP and this was a concern of the working group. Member lyer stated he believed they would be involved in the RFP as it progressed. 2. Member lyer reviewed the Solar /Wind Ordinance amendments. The draft would go to City Staff by end of July for review, then on to the Planning Commission. 3. There was a discussion about GreenStep Certification requirements. Mr. Brad Hansen gave the members an explanation of the PACE Commercial Energy District. Mr. Struve will contact Finance Director Wallin to set up a meeting to investigate the process of establishing a PACE Commercial Energy District. Motion made by Member lyer and seconded by Member Sierks to ask the City of Edina to investigate establishing a PACE Commercial Energy District in Edina. Motion carried unanimously. I. Air Quality Working Group. No Report. J. EEC Website. There was no report. K. GreenStep Cities Plan. Chair Latham will update the GreenStep Cities Plan and present at the next meeting. L. Turf Management Task Force. Turf Management Task Force Member Paterlini gave an update. There was a discussion about a no spray policy in some playgrounds and to have them posted "For Your Health No Spraying." This document was from 1994. Member Paterlini has looked at new signs. Member Paterlini would like to find funding for the signs. It was noted that some areas were being sprayed with more chemicals than required given that these areas were classified for higher weed tolerance. Motion made by Member Paterlini and seconded by Member Thompson to restore the Turf Management, document with the initial intent not to spray the areas designated "No Spray" and only allow authorities to spray with organics. Motion carried unanimously. M. City Council and EEC Work Session. There was a discussion about when EEC would be with City Council at a Work Session. Chair Latham will find the first available time. There was a discussion about possible topics to discuss with City Council. Chair Latham will update the agenda andhave it in the, packet for the July 2011 EEC meeting. VII. Correspondence and Petitions VI 11. Chair and Commission Member Comments A. Vice Chair appointment. No decision was made. IX. Staff Comments. A. Mr. Struve updates. 1. Mr. Struve gave an update on the City Survey. 2. Chair Latham told the members that the total remaining EEC budget is $8600.00 and asked the members to bring a list of potential purchases to the next meeting.. The purchases must be completed by December 31, 2011. 3. ULI benchmark progress report. No update. 4. Compostable Bags. No report. 5. Commission Badges. Member Gubrud will get the a new on when the new branding is completed. There was a discussion about starting the meeting earlier and shortening the agenda. No decision was made. There being no further business on the Commission Agenda, Chair Latham declared the meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Jane M Timm Deputy City Clerk IY 2007 SUBMITTAL FOR: FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT FUNDING 72ND STREET PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE PREPARED BY: CITY OF EDINA JULY 20, 2007 City of Edina July 20, 2007 Mr. Kevin Roggenbuck Transportation Coordinator TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD Mears Park Centre 230 East Fifth Street St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 SUBJECT: 72ND STREET PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM FUNDING SUBMITTAL Dear Mr. Roggenbuck: The City of Edina is submitting this application for Federal Transportation Enhancement (TE) Program funding the construction of a pedestrian and bicycle bridge over France Avenue in the vicinity of 72nd Street South. The project will result in the provision of safe and efficient pedestrian and bicycle facilities connecting a significant activity center east of France Avenue with established neighborhoods to the west. The western terminus of the bridge and approach will be located along 72nd Street near Lynmar Lane in the Cornelia neighborhood of Edina which is predominantly residential. The eastern terminus of the bridge approach will be connected to the Centennial Lakes pedestrian /bicycle trail network and the proposed Edina Promenade trail network (2008 Construction). The City of Edina is committed to providing maintenance for the useful life of this proposed structure. We believe this project is an excellent candidate for TE funding and look forward to its inclusion in the program. If you have any questions or need additional information please contact me at 952 - 826 -0443 or at whoule anci.edina.mn.us. Vincerely, "J'f Lwli VF&/ " Lif Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer Enclosures City Hall - 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952- 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 i f St. Anthony Parkway Bridge 72nd Street Pedestrian TABLE OF CONTENTS Federal Funding Application Form, Page 1 Project Information (Form 2) Page 2. Project Description Page 3 Transportation Enhancements Qualifying Criteria Page 7 Transportation Enhancements Prioritizing Criteria Page 12 Attachments: Attachment A — Concept Drawings From Edina Promenade Urban Design Plan Attachment B — Project Support Letters Attachment C - Cosh Estimate Attachment D - Appendix K / Project Implementation Schedule Federal Transportation Enhancement Fund Application INSTRUCTIONS: Complete and return completed application to Kevin Roggenbuck, Transportation Office Use only Coordinator, Transportation Advisory Board, 390 North Robert St., St. Paul, Minnesota 55101. (651) 602 -1728. Form 1 needs to be filled out electronically. Please go to Metropolitan Council's website for instructions. Applications must be received by 5:00 PM or postmarked on July 20, 2007. *Be sure to complete and attach the Project Information form. Form 2 1 GEI�RAL ICJFpRNtATIQN: _ b 1. APPLICANT: City of Edina 2. JURISDUCTIONAL AGENCY (IF DIFFERENT): Department of Public Works 3. MAILING ADDRESS: 4801 W. 50th Street CITY: EDINA STATE: MN ZIP CODE: 55424 4. COUNTY: Hennepin 5. CONTACT PERSON: Wayne Houle TITLE:, Director of Public Works, City PHONE NO. Engineer (952) 826 -0443 5.11r PROJECT INFORMATION ';1 R r< `i' 6. PROJECT NAME: 72nd Street Pedestrian Bridge 7 .BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION (Include location, road name, type of improvement, etc. A more complete description must be submitted separately as described in Specific Requirement #3 on p.5): The project includes the construction of a pedestrian and bicycle bridge over France Avenue in the vicinity of 72nd Street South. The bridge would provide a safe and efficient connection between the commercial, retail and offices located east of France Avenue and the residential neighborhoods west of France Avenue. 8. TE PROJECT CATEGORY — Check only one project grouping in which you wish your project to be considered (see p. 85). ❑ Scenic /Environmental ® Bicycle /Pedestrian ❑ Historic /Archaeological 9 Are you applying for funds from another source(s) to implement this project? Yes❑ No® If yes, please identify the source(s): 10. FEDERAL AMOUNT: $1,000,000 13. SOURCE OF MATCH FUNDS: City Property Taxes, State Aid Funds 11. MATCH AMOUNT: $1,000,000 14. MATCH % OF PROJECT TOTAL: 50% 12. PROJECT TOTAL: $2,090,000 15. PROGRAM YEAR: ® 2011 ❑ 2012 16. SIGNATURE 17. TITLE: Public Works Director /City Engineer i T PROJECT INFORMATION (Form 2) (To be ;used to assign State.. Aid Project Number after project is selected) Please fill in'the following information as it pertains to your proposed project. Items that do not apply to your .project, please label N /A. Do not send this form to the State Aid. Office. For project solicitation package only. COUNTY, CITY, `OR LEAD-AG ENCY: City of Edina COUNTY OR CITY NO ..: FUNCTIONAL CLASS OF ROAD: N/A ROAD SYSTEM: N/A ROAD NO.: N/A NAME OF ROAD: N/A LOCATION: From: Lynmar Lane To: 500 ft East of France Avenue SECTION - TOWNSHIP -RANGE OF ONE END OF PROJECT: TYPE OF WORK: Grading, Aggregate Base, Bituminous Trail, Concrete Walk, Pedestrian Bridge, Landscaping, Pedestrian Lighting BRIDGE /CULVERT PROJECTS OLD BRIDGE /CULVERT NO. N/A NEW BRIDGE /CULVERT NO. TBD STRUCTURE IS OVER France Avenue - CSAH 17 NAME OF TWP.: N/A r) PROJECT DESCRIPTION The 72nd Street Pedestrian Bridge would complete a missing link by overcoming the France Avenue barrier (ADT 28,700) for the pedestrian and bicycle circulation system in this part of Edina. The City of Edina has recently completed an area study examining the potential to provide attractive trail and sidewalk connections from the north end of Centennial Lakes towards Southdale Shopping Center and beyond. The pedestrian and bicycle amenities will include a significant emphasis on aesthetics and special amenities such as public art, water fountains at a similar caliber to the Centennial Lakes pedestrian circulation network. The proposed pedestrian bridge at 72nd Street is included with the study and is very strongly favored by the residents in the area as well as local businesses. The City is planning to construct the trail network east of France Avenue beginning in 2008. The 72nd Street Pedestrian Bridge would complete a missing link by overcoming the France Avenue barrier for the pedestrian and bicycle circulation system in this part of Edina. The project will result in the provision of safe and efficient pedestrian and bicycle facilities connecting a significant activity centers east of France Avenue with established neighborhoods to the west. The western terminus of the bridge and approach will be located along 72nd Street and Lyninar Lane in the Cornelia neighborhood of Edina which is predominantly residential. The eastern terminus of the bridge approach will be connected to the Centennial Lakes pedestrian/bicycle trail network and the proposed Edina Promenade trail network (2008 Construction). The Promenade and Centennial Lakes trail systems serve high density residential areas, medical offices, movie theatres, Centennial Lakes Park, Edinborough Park, the YMCA, Hennepin County Regional Library and Service Center and a multitude of retail shops including Target, the Galleria and Southdale Shopping Center. The Promenade trail also includes an east -west leg with connects to the City of Richfield. The total project cost is estimated to be approximately $2,000,000. Final project cost will be determined based upon the alignment and structure type selected as a part of a context sensitive design process with the public scheduled to begin later this year. The estimated project cost exceeds $125,000. This proposed project includes the following key elements of work: 1. Construction of a 14' wide pedestrian bridge including a main span of approximately 240 feet and approach spans totaling approximately 500 feet. 2. Grading and embankment construction on east and west approaches 3. Approximately 600 linear feet of 10' bituminous trail. 4. Trail lighting, landscaping, benches and trail signage. V. TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENTS PURPOSE: Transportation.Enhancements (TE) are transportation- related activities designed to strengthen the cultural, aesthetic and environmental aspects of the nation's interimdal transportation system. The TE program provides for the implementation,of non - traditional transportation projects. TE PpMose.and Vision TE. funds are directed toward projects that preserve historicl,archaeological, scenic and environmental resources-.related to surface transportation, and to facilitate bicycle and pedestrian use. Parks and open space preserve .natural resources and provide a, wide variety of'recreational opportunities. Trail corridors are intended -to provide for recreational travel along linear pathways throughout 'the metropolitan area. Preservation of historic features and protection ,of scenic areas permit appreciation of the natural resources that have influenced the region's development. GENERAL INFORMATION AND RESTRICTIONS The Safe Accountable Flexible Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA -LU) was signed into law in August 2005. Under SAFETEA -LU, Transportation Enhancement activities continue to be funded through a .10 percent set -aside from STP funds. All projects must relate to -surface transportation. Transportation Enhancement (TE) funds may be used for the activities identified in Qualifying Criterion #1. The region has allocated approximately $85 million in TE funds for projects since the beginning of the program in 1991. Through this solicitation, approximately $17 million in TE funds is expected to be programmed in Federal Fiscal Years 2011 and 2012. The Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) is responsible for the selection of projects that are to be financed in part with TE funds made. available to the seven- county region. To implement this responsibility, the TAB has developed policies to define eligibility and prioritize eligible projects. GENERAL POLICIES TE funds are available to all Minnesota state agencies, the Metropolitan Council; other transit providers, Indian tribal governments, the seven counties, all cities and towns within the Twin Cities seven county- region; and the ten Regional Park System ' Implementation agencies. Other local or special governmental agencies and private groups are also eligible, but must have a public agency sponsor. The agency sponsor is-the local unit of government of record. The local unit of government is responsible for making arrangements with the project proposer to ensure all project requirements of the local unit of government are met. An Agency Agreement is written between Mn/DOT and the local unit of government. The local unit of government will administer. the project using the State Aid for Local Transportation (SALT) Detegated Contract Process (DCP) for federal aid projects. 2. Generally, TE_funds are available for the activities, listed under #1 of the Qualifying Criteria and incidental activities associated with�'them if the incidental work does not constitute more than 30% of the project costs. See Qualifying 'Criterion #1 fora description of what is meant by "incidental activities ". 3. Generally, for projects that involve the construction of facilities, the TAB will provide TE funds for project construction and materials, right of way, and land, acquisition. For TE- eligible projects that do not involve construction (e:g., bicycle and pedestrian safety education activities), the TAB will provide TE funds for program implementation and related activities. TAB will not provide TE funds 4 for study completion, preliminary engineering, design, construction engineering, or other similar costs. 4. A TE construction or reconstruction project must be a permanent improvement having independent utility. Temporary construction is defined as work that must be essentially replaced in the immediate future (within five years). Staged construction is considered permanent rather than temporary so long as future stages build on, rather than replace, previous work. All projects must comply with the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act. Reconstruction of a bikeway /walkway facility is eligible as long as the facility is beyond its useful life. 5. TAB will not award more than $1,000,000 in TE funds for a specific project. TAB reserves the right to partially fund any project. The local (nonfederal) match in funding for any project must be at least 20% of the total. 6. Projects will be added to the TIP only as a result of the TAB approval in response to this and subsequent solicitations. 7. Projects listed in the region's draft or adopted TIP are assumed to be fully- funded and to have independent utility from other projects. TAB will not consider projects already listed in the draft or adopted TIP, nor the payback of Advanced Construction funds for those projects, for funding through the solicitation process. Projects submitted that are related to projects listed in the draft or adopted TIP but that have independent utility from those projects are eligible for consideration. 8. The Technical Advisory Committee shall prepare an annual report on the implementation of regionally solicited TE projects for the review and approval of the TAB. This report, the Annual Implementation Report shall include updated program, system and project information. The TAC shall include such findings, recommendations and additional information, as it deems appropriate. 9. TAB will base the fundable amount of a project on the original submittal. The TAB must approve any change in the scope of an approved project. The TE federal fund participation for each project will be updated and reported in the Annual Implementation Report as the federal cost cap. The federal cost cap will be based on an inflation adjustment set by the Transportation Advisory Board upon inclusion in the Transportation Improvement Program. 10. If a project is added to the TIP, the entire project is included even though a portion of that work extends beyond the period for which submittals were requested provided that a significant portion of the work is scheduled for letting within the request period. 11. Project approvals for projects in the TE element of the TIP are specifically limited to the federal fund amount identified in the Annual Implementation Report for purposes of plan specification and estimate (PS &E) approval as well as project authorization. The federal fund amount listed for each project may be used to fund 80% of any identifiable useable element of the project described or to fund the entire project with a flexible federal/non- federal participation. The federal fund amount listed in the Annual Implementation Report is the total that shall be authorized as PS &E approval for all advertisements of the project described. Any federal fund amounts authorized at PS &E approval in years prior to the current year shall be deducted from the amount identified in the TIP at the time of approval. As noted in Policy 5, TAB will not award more than $1,000,000 in TE funds for a specific project. 12. A TE project will be eliminated from the program if it does not meet its sunset date. The sunset date for projects is March 31 of the year following the program year identified in the project proposal or as otherwise established by the TAB. Meeting the sunset date established for a project shall be governed by the TAB adopted Criteria for Meeting Sunset Date requirements, attached as Appendix D. If the Criteria for Meeting Sunset Date requirements (as noted above) for a project have been met, but STP funds are not presently available, that particular project will be placed on a waiting list for funds, listed in order of date of approval, and the sunset date would not apply. G TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENTS PROJECTS - QUALIFYING CRITERIA Projects must be coordinated with all affected communities and other levels and units of government. The applicant must show that the project meets each of the following ten qualifying criteria to qualify for scoring under the prioritizing criteria. Answer each criterion in a numbered sequence. Failure to respond to any of the qualifying criteria will result in a recommendation to disqualify your project. 1. Qualifying Activities. The applicant must show that the proposed project falls under at least one of the following list of twelve qualifying activities and must state the specific category(ies) the project qualifies under. The list of qualifying TE activities provided in 23 U.S.C. 101(a)(35) of SAFETEA- LU is intended to be exclusive, not illustrative. That is, only those activities listed therein are eligible as TE activities. 1. Provision of facilities for pedestrians and bicycles. 2. Provision of safety and educational activities for pedestrians and bicyclists. 3. Acquisition of scenic easements and scenic or historic sites including historic battlefields. 4. Scenic or historic highway programs (including the provision of tourist and welcome center facilities). 5. Landscaping and other scenic beautification. 6. Historic preservation. 7. Rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation buildings, structures, or facilities (including historic railroad facilities and canals). 8. Preservation of abandoned railway corridors (including the conversion and use thereof for pedestrian or bicycle trails). 9. Inventory, control and removal of outdoor advertising. 10. Archaeological planning and research. 11. Environmental mitigation to address water pollution due to highway runoff or reduce vehicle - caused wildlife mortality while maintaining habitat connectivity. 12. Establishment of transportation museums. One or more of these activities must constitute at least 70% of the project cost. Unlisted ancillary activities such as paving a parking lot, constructing buildings or providing restrooms must constitute no more than 30% of the total project cost. Applicants whose project is part of a larger transportation project must provide a construction cost summary demonstrating that at least 70% of the project is eligible for Transportation Enhancement funds. Many projects include a number of activities — some which are on this list and others that are not. Only those project activities that are on the list may be counted as TE activities. For example, a rest area might include a historic site purchased and developed as an interpretive site illustrating local history. The historic site purchase and development would qualify as a transportation enhancement activity. Work that is made possible because a project presents an opportunity to improve and enhance the environment and or aesthetics in the vicinity of a project may be eligible for enhancement funding. For example, a construction project may present an opportunity to improve the condition of an adjacent stream bed to improve water quality, construct a vital link for a community bikeway system and develop a landscaped green area to enhance the downtown environment. 7 Activities that are not explicitly on the list may qualify if they are an integral part of a larger qualifying activity. For example, if the rehabilitation of a historic railroad station required the construction of new drainage facilities, the entire project could be considered for TE funding. RESPONSE: The project satisfies Item #1 of the Qualifying Criteria: Provision of facilities for pedestrians and bicycles. The ,project includes the ,construction of a pedestrian bridge over France Avenue (a 7 -lane "A- minor" functional class roadway ")'in the vicinity of 72nd Street. 2. The funded activities must be accessible to the general public or targeted to a broad segment of the general public, and must be ADA compliant. RESPONSE: The proposed bridge crossing.:and adjacent trail connections will be constructed to meet ADA requirements. 3. Projects must relate to 'surface transportation. Project Linkage (from federal guidance) To comply with Federal guidelines for eligibility there are two basic considerations: • Is the proposed action one of the listed activities in the TE definition in SAFETEA -LU? • How does the proposed action relate to surface transportation? The applicant must provide a clear statement describing this linkage. The definition of TE activities includes the phrase, "transportation enhancement activities means, with respect to any project or the area to be served by the project, any of the following activities, if such activity relates to surface transportation:..." The nature of a proposed TE project's relationship to surface transportation should be discussed in the project proposal that you submit. For example, where runoff from an existing highway contaminates an adjacent water resource and a transportation enhancement activity is proposed to mitigate.the pollution caused by the run off a clear highway or transportaiiori relationship exists. Another example might involve the acquisition of a scenic easement. The acquisition would be in connection with the preservation of a scenic vista related to travel along a specific route. Where a TE activity is for acquisition for scenic preservation purposes, and proposes to contribute to the visual experience of the traveler, but is „a substantial distance away with respect to a highway or transportation project, the TE activity must be determined to make a substantial contribution to the scenic viewshed. Given the nature of the list of eligible activities, it is not necessary that each TE activity be associated with a specific surface transportation project'to be'eligible for funding'. Examples which illustrate this include: the rehabilitation of a historic train structure, the provision of a bike or pedestrian path, or the establishment of a transportation museum. Proximity to a highway or transportation facility alone is not sufficient to establish a relationship to surface transportation. Additional discussion, beyond proximity, is needed in the TE project proposal to establish the relationship to transportation. For example, an historic bam that happened to be adjacent to a particular highway facility would not automatically be considered eligible for TE funds simply because of its location; visibility to the traveler in a ;way that substantially enhances the traveling experience could qualify. Specific documentation of the enhanced experience is required; conversely, a historic structure, such as the barn in the above example; could not be disqualified from consideration because it was not adjacent to a particular Federal -aid facility, as long as some other relationship to surface transportation could be established. 8 It is not necessary to have a TE activity function as an active transportation facility, either past or current, to qualify as an eligible TE activity. For example, a scenic or historic site may have a relationship to transportation but not function as a transportation facility. Once a relationship to surface transportation is established, TE activities can be implemented in a number of ways. For example, they can be developed as parts of larger joint development projects, or as stand -alone projects. RESPONSE: The project will result in the provision of safe and efficient pedestrian and bicycle facilities connecting a significant activity centers east of France Avenue with established neighborhoods to the west.. The western terminus of the bridge and approach will be located along 72 "d Street and Lynmar Lane in the Cornelia neighborhood of Edina which is predominantly residential. The eastern terminus of the bridge approach will be connected to the Centennial Lakes pedestrian/bicycle trail network and the proposed Edina Promenade trail network (2008 Construction). The Promenade and Centennial Lakes trail systems serve high density residential areas, medical offices, movie theatres, Centennial Lakes Park, Edinborough Park, the YMCA, Hennepin County Regional Library and Service Center and a multitude of retail shops including Target, the Galleria and Southdale Shopping Center. The Promenade trail also includes an east -west leg with connects to the City of Richfield. 4. The project must be included in, be part of, or relate to a problem, need or direction discussed in: 1) a local or county comprehensive plan found to be consistent with Metropolitan Council plans; 2) a locally approved capital improvement program; 3) an officially adopted corridor study reflected in the local plan; or 4) the official plan or program of the applicant agency. The applicant must reference the appropriate comprehensive plan, CIP, corridor study document, or other plan or program and provide copies of the applicable pages. Because all communities in the seven - county Twin Cities region are currently in the process of updating their local comprehensive plans, applications in the 2007 Solicitation may be for projects included in the most recent local comprehensive plan that was found to be consistent with Metropolitan Council plans. It also must not conflict with the goals and policies in these adopted regional plans: the 2030 Transportation Policy Plan, the 2030 Regional Framework, and the 2030 Regional Parks Policy Plan RESPONSE: The project is identified in the City's Capital Improvement plan (2008 -2012) and is outlined in detail as a part of the Edina - Centennial Lakes Path/Transit System Study (Oct, 2006) and is referenced in the Greater Southdale Land Use and Transportation Study. Typically a transportation project involves mitigation, work in addition to immediate construction activities, that is negotiated with permitting agencies and local governments as a condition of obtaining permit approval. Activities that are normally part of the mitigation of a transportation project are not eligible. NOT ELIGIBLE - Work that is required as a condition of obtaining a permit or concurrence for a different transportation project is not eligible for enhancement funding. For example, a city may require a highway expansion project to include streetscape enhancements in order to gain municipal consent. In that case, streetscape work performed to satisfy the municipal consent requirement is not eligible for Transportation Enhancement funding. Federal permitting and authorizing agencies may include the U.S. Forest Service, U. S. Corps of Engineers, and others. State permitting agencies may include the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, and the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office. Regional agencies may include watershed districts and metropolitan planning organizations. Local agencies may include counties and cities. RESPONSE: The funding requested for the 72 "d Avenue Pedestrian Bridge is only associated with the trail and bridge connection described above and does not represent any mitigation work. 5. The applicant must assure it will operate and maintain the property and facility of the project for the useful life of the improvement, and not change the use of any right -of -way acquired without prior approval from the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. The FHWA requires that states agree to operate and maintain facilities constructed with federal transportation funds for the useful life of the improvement, and not change the use of any right -of- way acquired without prior approval from the FHWA. TAB has determined that this requirement will be applied to the project applicant. FHWA considers most physical constructions and total reconstructions to have a useful design life of 10 years or more, depending on the nature of the project. Bridge constructions and total reconstructions are considered to have useful lives of 50 years. The useful life of the project will be defined in the inter - agency maintenance agreement that must be prepared and signed prior to the project letting. RESPONSE: The City of Edina will provide or contract for maintenance of the bridge and adjacent trail approaches over the useful life of the structure and trails. The cover letter from the City of Edina indicates project support and agreement to provide for all maintenance over the useful life of the improvements. 6. Projects must have an estimated total cost of at least $125,000. There are significant federal project processing requirements that come with federal funds. These requirements translate into expenditures of time and money on the parts of both the agency proposing/developing the project and the state agency administering the federal funds for the project. Project applicants can "bundle" projects together to meet this minimum. (Example: bundled projects could consist of signing and lighting a number of bike trails in several counties.) Communities may want to consider using joint powers agreements for implementing bundled projects. RESPONSE: The total project cost is estimated to be approximately $2,000,000. Final project cost will be determined based upon the alignment and structure type selected as a part of a context sensitive design process with the public scheduled. to begin later this year. The estimated project cost exceeds $125,000. 7. TAB will not award more than $1,000,000 in TE funds to a specific project. Other federal funds may be combined with TE funds. RESPONSE: The City is requesting the maximum of $1,000,000 in federal enhancement funds to help construct the project. All remaining funds are planned to be provided with local City Funds. 8. Projects must have an assured local (nonfederal funds) match of at least 20% of the estimated total cost of the proposed project. At the time of application, the applicant must assure the local match will be available when the project is authorized in the requested program year. If the applicant expects any other agency to provide part of the local match, the applicant must include a letter or resolution from the other agency- agreeing to financially participate. TAB will not award additional points for providing a match in excess of 20 %. The local match can be provided in the form of cash up front "hard dollars" or a "soft match". A "soft match" may include donated labor or construction materials if adequate documentation of its equivalent dollar value and availability can be provided. Donated labor must have expertise and experience in the type of labor required for the project and valued at rates consistent with rates ordinarily paid for similar work. Some type of time sheet must support donated labor. Donated materials, e.g., railroad ties, asphalt pavement, or wiring necessary to run a street car, must meet all standards and specifications. Caution in using a "soft match" should be taken to ensure the donated materials or labor during actual construction does not fall below the 20% non - federal match required to be able to receive 100% of the federal funds. Applicants wishing to use a soft match should first contact John Lindemer at Mn/DOT at 651- 296 -8480 to determine its value and eligibility. RESPONSE: The City of Edina is proposing to provide the matching funds for the project in hard dollars collected through property taxes and state aid funds. 10 9. Proposed designs for bikeways and for combined bike /pedestrian facilities must.meet MN /DOT State Aid standards. Exceptions to the State Aid standards may be granted during final design if warranted based on social, economic or environmental alternatives, not through this solicitation process. Failure to meet the standards or justify exemptions will result in the loss of federal funds. RESPONSE: The project will be designed for combined bike /pedestrian use and will meet MuDOT State Aid standards, AASHTO guidelines, Mn/DOT Minnesota Bicycle Design Guidelines and ADA guidelines and requirements. 10. Projects must be coordinated with all affected communities and other levels and units of government. Coordination is defined as written communication from the applicant to all affected communities informing them of the project. The applicant must provide a copy of the written communication as proof of coordination. RESPONSE: The project has been discussed within the City of Edina Public Works and Planning departments, Edina City Council, Edina Planning Commission, Neighborhood groups, business groups and 3 Rivers Park District. Copies of correspondence indicating project awareness and support are included with the attachments. 11 TE PROJECTS - PRIORITIZING CRITERIA Instead of the past practice of having general prioritizing criteria to which all projects must respond, the prioritizing criteria are now split into category and general/integrative criteria, as outlined on the following pages. Projects will be scored through the category and general/integrative criteria as follows: a) Category Criteria. All applications must be submitted in one of three categories: Scenic and Environmental; Bicycle and Pedestrian; and Historical and Archaeological. Applicants must submit their project under the proper category as outlined below. However, projects that incorporate more than one of the eligible TE activities will receive priority under the third category criterion, Relationship Between Categories. If prospective applicants are uncertain which category most appropriately includes their project, they should contact Council staff. The 12 Qualifying Activities (as listed and described in Qualifying Criterion #1 on previous pages) fall under those 3 categories as follows: 1. Scenic and Environmental: ➢ QA #3, Acquisition of scenic easements and scenic or historic sites; ➢ QA #4, Scenic or historic highway programs; ➢ QA #5, Landscaping and other scenic beautification; ➢ QA #9, Inventory, control and removal of outdoor advertising; and ➢ QA #11, Environmental mitigation to address water pollution due to highway runoff or reduce vehicle- caused wildlife mortality while maintaining habitat connectivity. 2. Bicycle and Pedestrian: ➢ QA #1, Provision of facilities for pedestrians and bicyclists; ➢ QA #2, Provision of safety and educational activities for pedestrians and bicyclists; and ➢ QA #8, Preservation of abandoned railway corridors (including the conversion and use thereof for pedestrian and bicycle trails). 3. Historic and Archaeological: ➢ QA #6, Historic preservation (with relationship to transportation, see Qualifying Criterion #2); ➢ QA #7, Rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation buildings, structures, or facilities (including historic railroad facilities and canals); ➢ QA #10, Archaeological planning and research (with relationship to transportation, see Qualifying Criterion #2); and ➢ QA #12, Establishment of transportation museums. Applications in a particular category will first be scored based on responses to questions pertinent to that category and subsequently will pass on to be evaluated under the general/integrative criteria. b) General/Integrative Criteria. All applications will then be evaluated against general and integrative criteria consistent with Metropolitan Council and Transportation Advisory Board goals and policies and federal program goals. c) Final Ranking. The Category Criteria scores will be added to the General/Integrative criteria scores to give final project scores. Projects will be ranked against other applications in their category to develop three ranked lists of TE projects, which will be evaluated all together by a multidisciplinary team of scorers, who will develop a single list of recommended projects.. 12 Transportation Enhancements Category Criteria (500 points) Each qualified project will be scored under four common category criteria within its TE project group: urgency; impact; relationship between TE categories; and relationship to intermodal/multimodal transportation. This will allow projects to be scored under these criteria relatively equally across the different categories while addressing the particular attributes of the project type. An explanation of each of the four common category criteria and reasons for their inclusion follows: 1. Urgency. This criterion measures how critical or time - sensitive the problem is that is being addressed by the project. Examples might include seizing an opportunity to preserve a scarce or endangered resource or addressing a critical need. 2. Impact. This criterion quantifies the benefit from the project, without specifically relating it to how the larger public will benefit (that calculation will.be made in part 2. of the general/integrative criteria). 3. Relationship between Categories. This criterion is being presented _under the assumption that the region recognizes that there is a value in having projects that provide more than one of the eligible TE activities. Examples might include the reconstruction of a bicycle /pedestrian trail leading to a historic transportation structure. 4. Relationship to Intermodal/Multimodal Transportation System. This criterion measures how the proposed project clearly and credibly relates to the surface transportation system. Surface transportation is defined to include all modes of travel with the exception of aviation and military transportation. Federal TE guidance states that proximity to a transportation facility alone is not sufficient to establish a relationship. ■ Scenic and Environmental Group (Qualifying Activities 3, 4, 5, 9, 11) NOT APPLICABLE ■ Bicycle and Pedestrian Group (Qualifying Activities 1, 2, and 8) 1. Urgency (250 points). Discuss if/how the project proposes or addresses each of the following: ■ Takes advantage of a time- sensitive opportunity, e.g., a willing landowner, cost savings, affiliation with another project, competing development opportunities RESPONSE: The City of Edina has recently completed an area study examining the potential to provide attractive trail and sidewalk connections from the north end of Centennial Lakes towards Southdale Shopping Center and beyond. The pedestrian and bicycle amenities will include a significant emphasis on aesthetics and special amenities such as public art, water fountains at a similar caliber to the Centennial Lakes pedestrian circulation network. The proposed pedestrian bridge at 72 "d Street is included with the study and is very strongly favored by the residents in the area as well as local businesses. The City is planning to construct the trail network east of France Avenue beginning in 2008. The 72 "d Street Pedestrian bridge would complete a missing link by overcoming the France Avenue barrier for the pedestrian and bicycle circulation system in this part of Edina. ■ Significantly addresses a strong un -met need or area of concern/problem associated with the development of an integrated bicycle or pedestrian transportation network or providing a safe bicycle or pedestrian route RESPONSE: As a part of the pedestrian circulation study public meetings which lead to the development of the bridge concept, many residents of the Cornelia neighborhood west of France Avenue have expressed a strong desire to be able to access the wide variety of shops, 13 businesses and recreational amenities east of France Avenue without having to drive to them. The neighborhood proximity to the Centennial Lakes area is within walking distance, however residents are discouraged from walking due to the France Avenue barrier to pedestrians and cyclists. Letters from residents are included in the appendix. Impact (250 points). Discuss how the project addresses each element below (respond as appropriate to A. or B., not both): A. Bike/Ped Infrastructure (QA #1, and QA #8): ■ Fills gaps, overcomes barriers, and /or connects system segments in pedestrian/bicycle network. The applicant should provide a map showing the location of the project within the context of an existing and planned bicycle or pedestrian network. If the project is removing a barrier, the applicant should demonstrate the magnitude of the barrier (number of lanes, average daily traffic, posted speed, etc.) and how the proposed project will improve travel across that barrier. RESPONSE: The proposed project is intended to overcome a significant barrier between residential neighborhoods west of France Avenue and the commercial and recreational amenities east of France Avenue. France Avenue currently carries 28,700 vehicles per day and is generally 8 -10 lanes wide at intersections making crossing very intimidating for most people. The east side of France Avenue does not have adequate provisions for pedestrian and bicycle traffic also limiting the attractiveness of crossing the street. Conversely, the Centennial Lakes area and proposed Promenade located approximately 500 feet east of and parallel to France Avenue provide a high quality pedestrian environment that connects commercial businesses, retail, recreation, and civic amenities situated among the landscaped gardens, ponds and open spaces. The 72 "d Street Pedestrian Bridge will span France Avenue thus allowing residents to easily move between their neighborhood to the vibrant Centennial Lakes area without the need to get in cars. ■ Project provides a high- demand facility or program. Relative levels of demand will be determined using population density and connections to significant travel attractors. Metropolitan Council staff will determine population density using 2000 residential population within one mile of the project. The applicant should also list below significant destinations that are near the facility or that the facility provides close connections to. Destinations can be recreation areas such as parks, beaches, rivers, lakes, etc; or commercial or mixed -use districts, major employment areas or other major cultural destinations. RESPONSE: The number and variety of destinations for pedestrians and cyclists using the 72 "d Street Pedestrian Bridge is expansive. The 72nd Street Bridge and trail will connect to the proposed Edina Promenade and Centennial Lakes trail networks which provide pedestrian access to virtually a small city within Edina. We have annotated many of these places on exhibits in the appendix. The following is a sampling of some of these destinations: • Centennial Lakes Park • Edinborough Indoor Park • Southdale YMCA • Hennepin County Library • Hundreds of retail shops between 66`h and I -494 including Southdale Shopping Center, Galleria Shopping Center, Yorktown Mall, Target • Fairview Southdale Medical Center 14 • Medical and other offices in throughout Centennial Lakes business park • Movie theaters • Restaurants ranging from fast food to white table cloth • Skateboard Park ■ Addresses safety concerns. The applicant should describe how the project addresses an identified safety problem. RESPONSE: Existing pedestrian and bicycle access across France Avenue is provided at signalized intersections between I -494 and 66`h Street. Although these intersections provide pedestrian indications, the sheer width of the roadway and volume of traffic create an imposing barrier for pedestrians, especially elderly, handicapped and children. The 72 "d Street Pedestrian Bridge would provide a safe efficient and comfortable alternative for residents west of France to cross the roadway and connect with the beautiful pedestrian environments created with Centennial Lakes and the Promenade. ■ Provides more than a local benefit. An example of such a project is a bicycle trail that is part of a county, regional or state trail system, or one that links different trail systems together. RESPONSE: The 72nd Street Pedestrian bridge is part of a larger trail network which runs generally east — west across Edina connecting with many activity centers and north south trails along the way. This network extends east into Richfield and is planned to extend west through the City of Edina. For Applications for Qualifying Activity #8 only: Who owns the railway corridor property and will there be an agreement to ensure the preservation and protection of the corridor? RESPONSE: Not Applicable B. Bike/Ped Programs (QA #2): - Not Applicable 3. Relationship between Categories (100 points). Projects will score higher if they provide multiple benefits toward the purpose of the Transportation Enhancements program. Applicants should review the respective category criteria to determine the extent to which the project relates to the other two categories: • What is the relationship to the Scenic and Environmental group? For example, how does the bike /ped project provide a natural resource enhancement? RESPONSE: The 72 "d Street Pedestrian Bridge will connect people with the Centennial Lakes trail network and Promenade trails. Both of these trail corridors provide users the ability to interact with the natural environments including a variety gardens and manicured landscapes, open spaces, water features as well as attractive design elements within the public realm and adjacent private properties. Centennial Lakes and The Promenade both display very high design aesthetic which gives pedestrians and cyclists a pleasurable experience as they travel through. The design aesthetic of the 72 "d Street Bridge will be developed in conjunction with public involvement and will likely result in an attractive structure which will enhance civic pride. 15 • What is the relationship to the Historic and Archaeological group? For example, how does the bike /ped project take advantage of or enhance historic and cultural resources or provide orientation/interpretation to users? RESPONSE: The 72 "d Avenue Pedestrian Bridge will connect residents with current cultural activities which occur on regular .basis, at Centennial. Lakes Park,. Edinborough Park and Southdale as well as civic amenities: such as libraries. 4. Relationship to Intermodal/Multimodal Transportation System (100 'points). Discuss how the project`will function as a component and/or enhancement of the transportation system: ■ How will the bicycle or pedestrian facility benefit the I experience of users of the transportation system? RESPONSE: The ,bridge will allow residents west of France Avenue to make many short trips to the Centennial Lakes /Southdale area by walking or biking in lieu of using automobiles. Providing convenient and efficient alternative to driving will encourage more people to walk or bike and result in healthier people and more interesting travel experiences. ■ How will the project benefit multiple modes of transportation ? - An example of a project that would do this would be a bicycle facility that connects to a transit center or a mixed -use pedestrian- oriented district, or a pedestrian project that is a component of a transit- oriented development. RESPONSE: The Promenade and Centennial Lakes trail corridors are anchored at the north (Southdale Shopping Center) and south (Edinborough) ends by Transit Centers offering connections to Metro Transit buses and local circulators. Residents living west of France Avenue will have a convenient and attractive trail to connect them with regional transit options without using automobiles. The Promenade and Centennial Lakes corridors are located in one of the best regional examples of a vibrant pedestrian district.. Providing convenient access to this district and the transit hubs by means of the new bridge at 72 "d Street will entice residents to access these amenities without getting into automobiles. ■ How does the facility serve trips that could otherwise,be made by motor vehicles? RESPONSE: The Promenade and Centennial Lakes corridors are located in one of the best regional examples of a vibrant pedestrian district. Providing convenient access to this district and the transit hubs by means of the new bridge at 72 "d Street will entice residents to access these amenities without getting into automobiles. General/Integrative Criteria (300 points) The criteria in this section apply to all projects submitted under the TE program, regardless of the category submitted under or the TE- eligible activities included in the project. The federal TE guidance requires a demonstrated relationship to surface transportation, and the questions asked in the first criterion below come directly from the federal TE guidance. The second criterion will help determine how important the, project or program will be to the region's residents, giving priority to those projects that benefit more than just local residents. The remaining criteria integrate the regional solicitation's criteria pertaining to all funding categories for supporting the integration of land use and transportation and maturity of project concept. 1. Development Framework Implementation 150 points The Development Framework is the initial "chapter" and the unifying theme of the Council's Metropolitan Development Guide. Xis the umbrella statement of regional policies, goals and strategies that will inform the Council's metropolitan system plans for airports, transportation, regional parks and wastewater service; as well as other policy plans adopted by.the Codicil. Under state law, each city and township in the seven - country metropolitan area. is required at "aeast every ,l0 years`to prepare`and- submit to the Metropolitan Council a local comprehensive plan that is consistent with the Council's metropolitan system plans;(Minn. Stat. 473.864). The next round of updated plans will be due in 2008. The Development Framework address how growth is accommodated and development occurs . =. such.as the mix of land uses, the number of housing units per acre, the integration of transit and -the connection of local streets, trails, bicycle and pedestrian pathways. Approximately 91% to 95% ofnew growth is forecast to be located in the urban area —in land use patterns that make efficient use of regional infrastructure -with the rest, ,5% to 9 %, in the rural area, particularly in small towns to be `designated as Rural Growth Centers. The Development Framework emphasizes: the need for intensified development in centers with convenient access to transportation corridors and in rural centers that want to grow and that lie along major highways. Regional investments can create a transportation system that includes, transit solutions that support attractive, walkable neighborhoods with homes, green space, public places and other amenities. It is vital that. communities make efficient use. of infrastructure and develop in a manner that conserves natural features and provides transportation options. By reinvesting in underused land and maintaining existing infrastructure, the region can accomodate growth on a smaller urban "footprint," slow: the rate of increase in traffic congestion, ease development pressures on rural land, save billions of dollars m local sewer, water and road construction costs, .maintain the housing stock and strengthen the vitality of older areas. Conserving and restoring natural resources of regional or local importance contributes to, a healthy natural environment and enhances our quality of life. Connecting regional and local features by natural- resource corridors helps sustain wildlife and plant habitat and shapes how development looks on the ground. In addition, a community in any part of the region may choose to develop and/or expand centers that work for their city. Centers vary in scale – from the downtowns of the region's two central cities to small centers that provide services to neighborhoods or rural areas. Centers integrate land -use patterns, mixing jobs, housing, retail, services and – potentially – open space and connect them with streets, sidewalks and trails. They can be planned as part of new development or created incrementally by adding the "missing pieces" – be they housing, jobs, services or street connections -to existing places in'all parts of the region. Urban Area Projects The applicant should describe and provide maps to indicate how the project will enhance: a.. Interconnections (0 -60 points). Project will improve connections between workplaces, residences, retail, services and entertainment activities and support the development of an interconnected system of local streets, pedestrian and bicycle facilities. Higher points for projects identified in community's comprehensive plan. b. Intensification (0 -60 points). Project supports intensification of area served and integration of land uses – increased housing, jobs, mixed use or transit oriented development. Project supports or serves redevelopment or reuse -of historic structures. Higher points for projects supporting higher numbers of new housing units and jobs consistent with adopted local plans. Higher points for projects supporting redevelopment, reuse of historic structures, activity centers, transit oriented developments at stations /stops along transitways or 2020 Local Arterial Corridors. 17 c. Natural Resources (0 -40 points). Project does not adversely affect natural.resources identified in the regional Natural Resources Inventory (Natural Resource Digital Atlas) or a'local natural resource inventory' identifying features of local significance including archeological and historic features (include natural resource map with project area shown). Higher points for projects describing best management practices to be used.in project implementation that will abate, prevent and remove point and nonpoint source pollution; reduce soil erosion; protect and improve water quality; and maximize groundwater recharge through surface water infiltration'. d. Life -cycle and Affordable Housing (0 -40 points). Project serves existing affordable and life -cycle housing or improves access land planned/$oned for affordable and'life -cycle housing. .Project improves quality of life and/or connects an amenity to the life -cycle and affordable housing around the project - Life -cycle housing; refers to varied housing options that meet people's preferences and circumstances at all of life's stages and, in particular, options other than the predominate larger -lot, detached, single - family home. For example, life -cycle housing includes smaller homes, apartments, townhomes, condominiums, senior housing for independent living or with a range of assisted - living services. Rural Area Projects The applicant should describe and provide maps to indicate how the project will enhance: Interconnections (0 -60 points) Project will improve connections that serve current rural residents or improve access to county and regional parks by residents residing in the urban service area and rural growth centers. The objective is to provide connections without encouraging new development. Intensification (0 -60 points) Project supports intensification of rural growth centers or supports rural cluster development that results in permanent rural/agricultural uses. Project supports or serves redevelopment or reuse of historic structures. Natural Resources (0 -40 points) Project does not adversely affect natural resources identified in the regional Natural Resources Inventory (Natural Resource Digital Atlas) or a local natural resource inventory - identifying features of local significance including archeological and historic features (include natural resource map with project area shown). Higher points.for projects describing best management practices to be used in project implementation that will abate, prevent and remove point and nonpoint source pollution; reduce soil erosion; protect and improve water quality; and maximize groundwater recharge through surface water infiltration. Life -cycle and Affordable Housing (040 points) Project supports existing life -cycle and affordable housing in rural growth centers and improves connections to existing life -cycle and affordable housing in the urban service area access to county and regional parks. Affordable/Life -cycle Housing Goal Affordable/lifecycle housing goals for the community or communities served by the project (Livable Communities Act and comprehensive plan goals 1996 - 2010), contact Metropolitan Council staff, Linda.milashiu§@Lmetc.state.mn.us .for numerical community goals'and community contact. Project relationship to afford'able/lifecycle housing goals Narrative description of how project serves existing affordable /lifecycle housing and addresses planned/poiential locations 'for affordable/life -cycle housing (medium to high density housing or mixed use areas with medium to high density residential densities permitted/planned). The narrative should include estimates of existing affordable /lifecycle housing (single - family, 18 townhouses, and multifamily apartments or condominiums) in project area and estimates of land planned for medium and high density residential development or mixed use development (includes residential as a permitted use). This information should be recorded through adopted comprehensive; plans or adopted small area /r edevelopment/corridor studies. For community affordable /lifecycle housing goal assessment and estimates contact the city's community development department. DATA Sources: To quantify intensity of existing and, future development, bolster new or strengthened linkages, illustrate natural -resource preservation,-or demonstrate affordable/lifecycle housing applicants may wish to use a vari ety of GIS data including existing land use data, census data, data " from comprehensive plans, approved corridor studies, master or redevelopment plans, or'TAZ data. Applicants wishing to integrate their proposals witheexisting data resources in a GIS can download several useful datasets at www.datahnder.org including: o Metropolitan Council's 2005 Generalized Land Use o Regional Planned Land Use data 0 2030 Development Framework Natural Resource Areas o County and municipal,boundaries. o Development staging`as a part of the,Comprehensive Plan Composite 0 2000 Census data witheregional forecasts for 2010, 2020, and 2030 by TAZ o Major Highways o TLG Street Centerline data 0 2005 MARKHURD'aerial photography [NOTE: Both the TLG Street Centerline data and the 2005 MARKHURD aerial photography are licensed,datasets that are available to qualifying'agencies (MetroGIS participants) free of charge. Please read Ordering Instructions for each dataset. at www.datafinder.or for further information.] Additional GIS data sets can be acquired from other governmental agencies that could be helpful in supporting your project, in particular, the Natural Resources criteria. Consider the Minnesota DNR (http: / /deli.dnr.state.mn.us) and the Land Management Information Center (http /l:lmic;state.rnn.us /6house /metalong.html) among others. Applicants are also encouraged to contact local community or county authorities for additional GIS data, corridor studies, master plans or redevelopment plans. Applicants can alternately use the Council's new online mapping application to illustrate information, in your project area and'create PDF map documents to attach to your application (http: / /gis.metc. state .mn.us /mgpsdata/onlinemappiri . 2. Maturity, of Project Concept 150 points Projects selected through this solicitation will be programmed for construction in 2011 or 2012. That is a fairly Jong time but it takes several years to complete preliminary engineering, environmental studies and acquire right -of -way. The region must manage the federal funds in each year of the TIP. Projects that are not implemented in their original program year create problems. Proposed projects that have already completed some of the work is a plus. A schedule is important to know what kind of work might be needed. Large projects that need right -of -way require more work than others that do not. 0 -150 points Applications involving construction must complete the project implementation schedule found in Appendix K. A detailed schedule of events is expected for all phases of the. project. Applications involving non - construction projects must 19 include a detailed discussion of the timeframes involved for. initiating and completing each phase of planned activities. Points under this criterion are assigned based on how many steps have been taken toward implementation of the project. These steps reflect a federally funded project development path. TOTAL: 1000 POINTS 20 ATTACHMENT A - CONCEPT DRAWINGS FROM EDINA PROMENADE URBAN DESIGN PLAN` On the east side the primary destination is the central spine and the Promenade / Cen- tennial Lakes path system. On the west side the origin / destination points are the regional trail that extends to the west and the residen- tial neighborhoods located to the west. This section presents some preliminary loca- tion and configuration options for the two bridges. However, more in -depth studies are required to further define the exact bridge types to be used and the approach align- ments and configurations. ---------------------------------------------------------- Overpass Design The overpass bridges at France Avenue could be designed in various styles utilizing a number of techniques. Figures 45 and 46 provide examples of various bridge types that might be applicable. They range from a very basic, pre- fabricated arch truss bridge to highly complex, yet dynamic cable -stay or artistically clad bridges. The France Avenue overpasses would be located in a very prominent location in the City of Edina and, therefore, might warrant special consideration and treatment. -------------------------------------------------- Overpass Configuration Options For the 72nd Street crossing, there are a number of ways of how the bridge and the bridge approaches could be configured. Fig- ures 47 through 50 provide concept diagrams of how the overpasses could be aligned and configured. For the 69`h Street crossing, there is essentially only one option, bottom plan in Figure 50, although there may be a number of variations of how the approaches might be aligned. Each diagram identifies the three compo- nents required for the overpass. ■ Retained Fill Segments. Typically, some of the lower segments of the bridge approaches are constructed on fill with sloped embankments or retaining walls. These are shown in yellow. IV. Promenade Design Structured Approach Segments. At a certain height the retained fill con- struction would become uneconomical and the bridge approach design would convert to a pylon supported structured section. These are shown in orange. Bridge Segments. The segment over the roadway would be a true bridge. These are shown in red. The diagrams also indicate approach paths for accessing the overpasses. All the overpasses are assumed to be ap- proximately 10' wide, although this would need to be revisited in final design. The ob- jective would be to provide enough room for pedestrians and bicyclists, as well as small machines for cleaning and clearing snow from the bridges. For accommodating the small machines, straight bridge approaches would be preferable over switchbacks. The concept plans show the bridge ap- proaches and the bridges only. If desired, stairs could be added where needed for addi- tional direct access. 72nd Street Options Following is a brief description of each of the six overpass options for the 72nd Street cross- ing. Actually, there are a number of other permutations, since some of features in each of the options could be mixed and matched or interchanged between the options. Unless the bridge approach on the west side can be fitted into the 72 "d Street ROW, prop- erty may need to be acquired or an easement may need to be obtained from the Sunrise Assisted Living property. In addition, property may need to be ac- quired, or an easement may need to be ob- tained on the east side form the Home Store property and, depending upon the alignment option selected, also from the Byerly's prop- erty. Edina Promenade UM Urban Design Plan April 2007 m Cable -Stay Bridge - Midtown Greenway Arch Cable - Edina Steel Truss - Minneapolis April 12, 2007 Edina Promenade CL O. Suspension BrIfte - Boston Arch Cable - Denver Wood Truss - St. Cloud Figure 45 Overpass Examples Group 1 Urban Design Plan Overpass Concepts Ornamental Truss - St. Paul Ornamented Beam - Kansas City Arch Truss - Rochester April 12, 2007 c1p���4 %1 Edina k I�romenade e URS Urban Design Plan Arts Truss - Paris Specially Clad Beam - Chicago m Switchback Ramps - Rochester Figure 46 Overpass Examples Group 2 Overpass Concepts Option 1 - Plan - 1:20 Ramps (5 %) ® 0 100 300 Feet Option 1 - Image m Figure 47 Overpass at 72ns St. - Option 1 Overpass Concepts Legend Bridge Segment (Special Bridge Structure) o Bridge Approach Segment (Pylon Supports) o Retained Fill Segment (Retaining Walls) Access Paths rv9i- =.t,�„ O B ttt4 �y '4(ypiii�N,�S Edina Promenade Urban Design Plan April 12, 2007 Option 2 - 1:20 Ramps (5 %) ® 0 100 300 Feet Option 3 - 1:20 Ramps (55,o) ® 0 100 300 Feet I EN Figure 48 Overpass at 72ns St. - Options 2 & 3 Overpass Concepts Legend Bridge Segment (Special Bridge Structure) o Bridge Approach Segment (Pylon Supports) o Retained Fill Segment (Retaining Walls) Access Paths �4tj►--�l,L Jo in �Proinena. � Urban Design Plan April 12, 2007 Option 4 - 1:20 Ramps (5 %) 0 100 300 Feet iiiia Option 5 - 1:20 Ramps (5 %) 0 100 300 Feet 66 Figure 49 Overpass at 72ns St. - Options 4 & 5 Overpass Concepts Legend E Bridge Segment (Special Bridge Structure) o Bridge Approach Segment (Pylon Supports) a Retained Fill Segment (Retaining Walls) Access Paths o e Edina Promenade Urban Design Plan April 12, 2007 Option 6 - 1:12 Ramps (8.3%) ® 0 100 300 Feet Niiiiii Figure 50 Overpass at 72ns St. - Option 6 & 69th St. Option Overpass Concepts Legend Bridge Segment (Special Bridge Structure) o Bridge Approach Segment (Pylon Supports) o Retained Fill Segment (Retaining Walls) - -��j Access Paths �IT�r\ 1. 0 V .3 Edina Promena � e Urban Design Plan April 12, 2007 69th St. Option 1 - 1:20 Ramps (5 %) ® 0 100 300 Feet *�� VM Option 1. In this option (Figure 47), the bridge approach on the west side would me- ander or 'snake' in order to create enough distance for the 420' -long approach. This would require a greater easement from and would have a greater impact on the Sunrise Assisted Living property. The bridge would be positioned diagonally across the intersection. In order to shorten the bridge span, it might be feasible to locate a pylon in the median of France Avenue. Option 2. In this option (top plan in Figure 48), the bridge approach on the west side is straightened out, but it curves around the corner at Lymar Lane. The bridge configuration would be the same as in Option 1. Option 3. In this option (bottom plan in Fig- ure 48), a switchback is introduced on the west side. This would require some ease- ment from the Sunrise Assisted Living prop- erty. It would also be less desirable since the west side approach would be more difficult to clean and, since people do not like to back- track, fewer people might be inclined to use the overpass. The bridge configuration would be the same as in Option 1. Option 4. In this option (top plan in Figure 49), the bridge would be aligned with the north side of 72nd Street, which would create a shorter overall bridge, but would have an impact on the southwest corner of the Byerly's property. In Option 4, any one of the previously dis- cussed configurations for the west side ap- proach could be used. Option S. This option is similar to Option 4, except that the bridge would be aligned on pylons along the median of France Avenue. The feasibility of this option would need to be tested, due to potential undesirable impacts ►V. Promenade Design on the traffic operations along France Ave- nue. Option 6. This option illustrates a potential overpass configuration using steeper bridge approaches. The approaches would have a slope of 8.3 %, or a rise of 1' in 12', which would require special handrails and a landing every 25'. 69the Street Overpass The 69th Street Overpass has only one option that locates the bridge approaches along the office complex and Southdale parking lots, on the north side of 69" Street. The two issues with this option are that it would require a long structured approach on the west side, in order to clear the driveway access to the office complex and the Think Bank, and it would require a special pedes- trian crossing of Valley View Road, at the north end. An option, to mitigate the need for the special pedestrian crossing, might be to extend the structured approach over Valley View Road and to descend to grade on the west side of Valley View Road. --- ------- ------- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- Overpass Conclusions At this point it is difficult to make recommen- dations regarding which might be the pre- ferred overpass configurations, until further more detailed studies and evaluations are completed. 72nd Street Overpass As was mentioned before, the straightest configurations would be the most preferable, however, they may have impacts on adjoining properties and on traffic operations. The key issues that need to be addressed for the 72nd Street overpass are: Feasibility of fitting the west side ap- proach in the 72nd Street ROW, or getting easements from the Sunrise Assisted Living property. Edina Promenade I= Urban Design Plan Apri12007 • Feasibility of getting easements from the Home Store, and, potentially, also from the Byerly's properties. • Feasible of placing one or more support pylons in the median of France Avenue. 69th Street Overpass The key issues that need to be addressed for the 69`h Street overpass are: • Feasibility of fitting the approaches and bridge supports in the 69th Street ROW. • Which side of Valley View Road should the west side approach be located. 1. Preliminary Cost Estimate Following is a preliminary construction cost estimate for the proposed Edina Promenade site improvements. The estimate is based on the concept design developments presented in this report. The detail in the cost estimate represents the level of refinement that has been completed to date. The cost estimate data, presented in the four cost estimate tables, includes a cost estimate for each of the three segments, identified be- low, and a summary of all the costs, including the York Avenue underpass. Segment Approximate Length North Segment 700' Middle Segment 1000' South Segment 1100' For comparison, the approximate lengths of the North Park segment in the Centennial Lakes Park is approximately 700' from the north edge of the Park to the Parklawn Ave- nue bridge. Various options exist for staging the project. The project could be implemented by seg- ment, or it could be implemented by con- structing the bicyclist path first for the full IV. Promenade Design length of the project and then proceeding to implement the rest of the project. Also, since the special feature areas call for including public art, they could be imple- mented incrementally, depending upon the funding and arts program requirements. Edina Promenade UM Urban Design Plan Apr# 2007 r - July 17, 2007 Heather Worthington Assistant City Manager City of Edina 4801 W. 50' St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Heather: We are writing:to you in'support of the proposed pedestrian bridge in the..Southdale area of Edina. This would give area residents much- needed pedestrian access .to all that the area has to offer. In the Cornelia neighborhood, we. live within walking distance of the library, shopping, medical offices, restaurants, the YMCA, movie theatres and the wonderful Centennial Lakes Park, but cannot safely access it on foot due to the heavy volume and high speed of traffic on France Ave. A n pedestria bridge at 72 "d and France would be a. wonderful asset for our community — we think''the city would be surprised at the pedestrian traffic it would generate and the boost it would give to the livability of out area. We would love to get out of our cars and walk. When this area was initially developed in the late 1950s one of its main selling points was the proximity to all of the Southdale amenities. A look at new development today shows that such amenities are still important but in addition today's buyers are seeking pedestrian- friendly communities. The proposed bridge is a good start in that direction and will increase the area's attractiveness.to future buyers. We are proud thatMayor,Hovland has signed the U.S. Mayor's Climate Protection Agreement and see, building pedestrian- friendly communities as a way to meet the first goal of that agreement - to "Strive to meet or beat the Kyoto Protocol targets in their own communities, through actions ranging from anti - sprawl land -use policies to urban forest restoration projects to public information campaigns." With this project we have an opportunity.to start delivering on that promise. We hope that this project will go forward, and understand that you have applied for grants to help facilitate the funding of this proposal. We strongly lend our support to the project, and would be happy to work with the City to make this plan come to fruition. Sincerely, Vaughn Asselstine Paul Swanberg Susan Johansen Lorenzo Tunesi Lynn Swanberg Gier Johansen Eman Zhody Paulette Hastings Robert Gubrud Dan Nelson Paul Hastings Rosie Gubrud Christine Misselt A. Lynn Misselt Deborah Swanson Scott Swanson CYPRESS EQUITIES July 3, 2007 Heather Worthington Assistant City Manager City of Edina 4801 W. 50' St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Heather: We are writing today in support of the proposed pedestrian bridge over France Avenue that will serve the area in and around our property. This important link will provide residents living west of France Avenue a means of crossing France Avenue, which is a busy six -lane thoroughfare in this area. The continued economic prosperity of the Southdale Area is augmented by the ability of pedestrians to access this important shopping and commercial corridor. We hope that this project will go forward, and understand that you have applied for grants to help facilitate the funding of this proposal. We lend our support to the project, and would be happy to continue discussions with the City to make this plan come to fruition. cerely, Kirk Williams V.P. of Development 15601 Dallas Parkway, Suite 400 Addison, Texas 75001 (972) 361 -5804 Fax (972) 361 -5928 www.cypressequines.com July 16, 2007 Heather Worthington Assistant City Manager City of Edina 4801 V. 501h St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Heather: As follow -up to our conversation last month, I am writing to urge the early creation of a pedestrian bridge over France Avenue. at 72nd Street. The most important reason to create this connection from the neighborhood west of France Avenue to the Southdale Area is safety. Crossing France Avenue on foot or bicycle is tricky business. The combination of heavy traffic, drivers who don't always see pedestrians, and the timing of the walk light (quite short to get through six lanes) make for a potentially dangerous situation. Other reasons to consider this bridge include the positive benefits of getting residents out of their cars — to create a greater sense of community, to encourage exercise for better health, to combat the obesity epidemic in children and adults, and to reduce environmental damage of gas consumption and emissions. The Southdale Area offers entertainment, dining, shopping, educational and business opportunities for residents of all ages. I support the City's efforts to acquire funding for this project, and will assist however I can to make this plan a reality in the near future. Sincerely, Paulette G. Hastings Construction Cost Estimate City of Edina 72nd Street Pedestrian Bridge Federal Aid Part iciaatine`Iteins (TE Bridge S'fructure ' (10,500 SOFT. X $150 /sf) $ 1-,5751000 -Deck, Beams; Superstructure, Pier Footings, Railings Bituminous Trail 10' (5300 SF X $3 /SF.) $ 16,000 Cast In Place Retaining' Wall (2440 SF. X $100/ SF.) $ 244;000 Guard Railings (285 LF X $250 /LF.) $ 71,000 Trail Lighting (LS.) $ 104,000 Signage (LS.) $. 10,000 Traffic Control (LS.) $ 50,000 Landscaping (LS.) $ 20,000 Notes: Construction Total $2,090,000 Engineering / Administration 25% $ 523,000 Total Project Cost $2,613,000 - Cost are indicated in 2007 dollars. - Cost -Based on preliminary concept. Actual cost will be based upon final design selected as part of a context sensitive public involvement process. 72nd Street Pedestrian Bridge APPENDIX K Project Implementation Schedule Please check those that apply and fill in anticipated completion dates 1) Project Scope Stake Holders have been identified Meetings or contacts with Stake Holders have occurred 2) Layout or.:Preliminary Plan Identified Alternates Selected Alternates Layout or Preliminary Plan started Layout or Preliminary Plan completed Anticipated date or date. of completion 200$ 3) Environmental D_ ocume tion EIS '-.EA PM Documen tatus Document not started Document in progress; environmental impacts identified Document submitted to State Aid for review (date submitted Document approved (need copy of signed cover sheet) Anticipated date or date of completion/approval 1-4181b 4) R/W No R/W required - R/W required, parcels not identified R/W required, parcels identified R/W has been acquired Anticipated date or date of, acquisition ®CC.eA► Fat r' 200°[ 5) kpilroad Involvement No railroad involvement on project Railroad R/W Agreement required; negotiations not begun Railroad R/W Agreement required; negotiations have begun Railroad R/W Agreement is complete 6) C nstruction Documents/Plan Construction plans have not been started Construction plans' in progress Anticipated date or date of completion Construction plans completed/approved 7) Letting y� Anticipated Letting Date T M l 20 M 130 (e �� PRELIMINARY BIKE BOULEVARD STUDY � y i ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA TRANSIT FOR LIVABLE COMMUNITIES FIRST PHASE BIKE BOULEVARD CITY OF EDINA FEBRUARY 9, 2009 FORWARD: This preliminary study is being submitted at the request of Mr. Steve Clark — Walking and Bicycling Program Manager with Transit for Livable Communities (TLC). Mr. Clark has been working with the Bike Edina Task Force along with City Staff to initiate the first phase of a bike boulevard that is adjacent to the City of Minneapolis. Mr. Clark has indicated that this phase has been "short listed" by the TLC. The bike boulevard will incorporate more permanent pavement markings to be signed for bicyclists. The route will be signed with route markers and kiosks. Bike detectors will be added to the traffic signal at West 54th Street and France Avenue. The intersection below Trunk Highway 62 will incorporate colored lanes to indicate bike lanes through this complicated interchange. LOCATION: The bike boulevard will start along West 54th Street, east of France Avenue, proceed west to Wooddale Avenue, south to Valley View Road, south to TH62 interchange, continue south to West 70th Street (see Figure 1.) Leo w,j Figure 1. Proiect Area Map Preliminary Bike Boulevard Study February 9, 2009 HISTORY: This project was initiated by communications with the Transit for Livable Communities. The City of Edina has submitted two prior applications that included first phase routes through the City. These routes extend the walk - ability and bike - ability of Minneapolis and Edina. This study includes aspects from those prior proposals. EXISTING CONDITIONS & CHALLENGES: The existing geometric roadway data for these corridors are shown on the attached Bike Boulevard Analysis. Staff analyzed the corridor to incorporate bike lanes. All of the corridors except West 54th Street east of France Avenue are designated Municipal State Aid (MSA) roadways. These corridors were analyzed using standards set by the Minnesota Department of Transportation for both their Municipal State Aid standards and the Bikeway Facility Design Manual. The two major challenges identified through this analysis are: 1. The MSA standards limit the use of bike lanes along these roadways (see attached Bike Boulevard Analysis.) The MNDOT Bikeway Facility Design Manual increases the use of bike lanes along these corridors, see attached Bike Boulevard Analysis. 2. Current on- street parking would need to be removed from West 54th Street (currently has both sides of parking) and Wooddale Avenue (currently only one side of parking). PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: The following sketches indicate the corridors that could possibly have marked bike lanes added based on the MNDOT Bikeway Facility Design Manual Standards. The intent of these sketches is to indicate that a quick analysis was performed. W k Sketch 1: West 54th Street — France Avenue to Zenith Avenue Page 2 of 8 4 W k Sketch 1: West 54th Street — France Avenue to Zenith Avenue Page 2 of 8 I Preliminary Bike Boulevard Study February 9, 2009 "IT- WRI j r 0. DAI— 011 P1 K.Nb L S q J -4 Sketch 2: West 54th Street - Minnehaha Boulevard to France Avenue "I 4,p, M- � 7Fw 77WTMTF p 514 LA3 Sketch 3: West 54th Street - Wooddale Avenue to Minnehaha Boulevard C It Z W-.S,&AL— I'VE Sketch 4: Wooddale Avenue - West 56th Street to West 54th Street 3. V d4 Page 3 of 8 Preliminary Bike Boulevard Study February 9, 2009 - - - -- -- - Ril HT OF' WA Pm- RUCT NEW DRIVEWAY AP & --I]N ALL DRIVEWAYS, 1 REMOVE I7 UW,1NpUS REMO AND CUM UCT NEW 5610 CMG ALUM WOODDALE AVE UNLE OTMERW C EmTED. REMOVE ,DRIVE /APRON p 4C No PAS r- j -+ o r e� , esc�. { 5620 5616 5606 5600 5644 1 r ! 36' F F y r 1� 5656 1 r_ r 1 x 1 G I ti 1 B X VIDTH�r k r t I 1. . .. l � ■ � Y. 7 _ -i- __�' , y .. ...-«. L.. - _T...t.. 5609 1-1150-07 7i [ ,r' P -F I BICNE a E D S,A.P. 12 1 LA -TR : S A. 46 +90.00 5655 ta_y{T •i —_ I 5633 5617 5613 C1 cc �KC 1 Sketch 5: Wooddale Avenue — Woodland Rd to West 56th Street 21SR, I'M& J YXIFr ux trr+u«rs Wi1rXt rD ar.sTrA:cTTak if PROPOSER ,WALK 10 -5.65 rF (� ! :rB S'rRL: r MV QW. DRMVA'/ AI:RGRS ON ALL DRNEWAYS. / SAW CUT AIA: CID+STxtA'i IEW 861A Cifi AURG VDDDDAIE AVE % f - -1 IAILCSS 071+ERVlsE AUi �. 1r [__.. REMOVE 6I lRA0mU5 --- '- -- - RIG91 OF V NY 1 /J ED) REMOVE : DRIVE(AP � O 4500 jj C -Or4 6020 6016 6012 Y r aeu , v x a R I , f:il 4 *..A�L 1 I 8k rE R RELOCATE \,ilPB RSkii CURS I) 32 F -F ELOCATE CA / -'IN S.A.P. 120 - 150 -07 S T AL 10 +55.00 _ 6101 asp 6041 B:tt•� -.-. &w•. 8K CLEW, A06.74 A c f JILT ` �` 4 + rAx Sf E FRAER .� ' fI04H� r (' -: Ns ":..:`• �. �� VALLEY VEIY R0. L .. +;,r♦ w D�cc..� T. 9+ R«+ +�� a GRDq(VIEV AVE._ AV ST +•fi. D' +.'a ew Ews+ $to6 +a SU . D.eb tat AD, FD + 4RS m....., ..... .. -ELK Sketch 6: Wooddale Avenue — Valley View Road to Woodland Road 5 -64. i / �\ �• / s \ t ` \ .t . gyp. P "-, A I _ NEW NN%ISTONE WALLS ' .Y'' pl�f,.�,{i 12D.-ISQ. "�9�,. G, .gyp '•` GEWRAL NOTED ' 1 �'d VERITY ALL UTILITIES PRIIIR TO CONS'rMXTIGR. STA. 64+48.1 SD \ CIVISTRUCT WV COMC. DRIVEWAY APRONS ON ALL DRIVEWAYS. a \ �' AMVE AND CONSTRUCT NEW 8619 CAG ALEM VALLEY VI((£V RA - X, - S/ AR �c�a aV G� 1\•',' �Gl �� ��� ` �4 '' Y � — --- RIfdIT OF WA'! 12 , *A 2 \\ _ --_ LANE MARKING (t' nvA yy' \\ 1 PR 1POSeD arnc WALK �/ i CLEAR G CRVB TREE RENOYE 01TVNfNlYJS T REN^'.'E CCNC. WAL.k PROTFCI NFNNEPIN Y SAW CUT + CONST. LIMITS l ',\ `t _ (✓ Ar?^.NE CLl!(C ARi�E /APRgPi A < C -T ! III l Lc,NTY No .., +rrr .� RETAIMING WALL ti Sketch 7: Vallev View Road — Wooddale Avenue to Oaklawn Avenue Page 4 of 8 I Preliminary Bike Boulevard Study February 9, 2009 Sketch 8: Valley View Road — Oaklawn Avenue to Brookview Avenue cEKRAL IEITER+ - 10 -5 -52 VEF6Y ALL UTILITIES PRIORY TO CiNSTRUCTit" CONSTMrT KEW CON". RRIVCWAY PPRIPIS ON ALL EiiVI.VATS. RWVE A:m CMISTPUCT Iw P610 CLO AL@Y1 VMSU V;EV PI. END TAPER U RE!dOV7. EXISIINC WALL . AS NECi RTGHI" P_0 ^ 42 IS K I � u 4 @f�IN sgs �2o- isD -D� VALLEY VTE\.r P /1. , l T 5 , 4 $ STA. 40�14.00 - R= 5.3.42 NEW LANNONSIUNE NAZI 9i_ f ^, _ <' _ T y .r -� -• -a- e s NVI. I ,A"'° ... -.. RIGHT OF WAY ENDt TPER E LANE MARKING PROPOSED CONC. WALK "I n :ten,. RETATN[NG WALL I 1 �! Q REMOVE, DITUMINOUS 1 CLEAR & GRUB TREE Q REMOVE COMC. WALK 1 SAW CUT + COi1ST, LIMITS L'J II�� REMOVE CONC. DRIVE/APRON 1 PROPOSED DECIDUOUS TREE R:,H vT.it EIEV • 885 8H REV. FAA] nyl Y^JISISTY' �Y1iN �,, V SE [gafEF w� TLw • eauo ASBUILT 6�� =� Sketch 9: Valley View Road — Brookview Avenue to TH67J2 `T;EI UP t REST CSTII STREET .11L 10C �..` k��_H_NOYAL F1LA11 i. PAW A-' ---G_ V. H. TR 6Y� [ V. T U. °�, `" ICE. .x: € .. . . lm tt. a a�Alih. Nli. 1[�i Cel. u. •� n.l..mhlcn uv(a.: u�^iD[�n: 9 MIST. FLA. -- Page 5 of 8 Preliminary Bike Boulevard Study February 9, 2009 Sketch 11: Valley View Road — West 65th Street to West 66th Street Sketch 12: Valley View Road - West 68th Street to West 66th Street Page 6 of 8 Preliminary Bike Boulevard Study February 9, 2009 FU1 Iq c '� � ! � _• :\` �� w.�e .�"�� %' � -' =�:a� =sue¢ "•g• AA P ,CAF �����••• R �� ,,.ri �!" �wf 's / rc NUG.. pc:.. rr:. ,-k—pu' -- bia...` 6.w k�u °s-i? `f 'r 1 7 �r-- -, i ,. ' tl'LA IL.L1l E�1 P. f �fI', OIJful SCALE: 1' -50' i:l bi / -/ �q P / Q Ilk °{e ! I nrvu lima 237-� 1 atw,wa I Kays i.m)s r)am I .Ff!N M AVE Sketch 13: Valley View Road — West 70th Street to West 69th Street Portions of Valley View Road, see sketch 7, 8, and 9, will require "share the road ". This is due to not meeting either MSA or Bikeway Facility Design Manual standards for these sections. Striping of these areas will be accomplished with a higher technology striping that will groove the pavement prior to placing the marking material. This enables the pavement marking to last longer since it is below the pavement surface (See attached information on this pavement marking system.) The bicyclist chevrons and markings will be completed with the Duraprint technology. This technology imprints the decal into the pavement. Crosswalk markings using this technology in the City have lasted more than 5- years. The kiosks will be designed to match other kiosks within the Minneapolis system. Page 7 of 8 Preliminary Bike Boulevard Study February 9, 2009 PROJECT COSTS: Estimated project costs are shown below, see attached cost estimate for break down of costs: Corridor Cost Running Total Cost West 54th Street — Wooddale to Zenith $ 61,000 $ 61,000 Wooddale Avenue — Valley View to 54th $ 59,000 $120,000 Valley View Road — 70th to Wooddale $146,000 $266,000 Total Cost $266,000 The cost to add bike lanes to Wooddale Avenue from West 54th Street to West 50th Street is $38,000. FUNDING: Any MSA funding will require variances as required by Minnesota Rules Chapter 8820. We understand that the TLC has an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Transportation - State Aid for Local Transportation Division that any variances required will be given as administrative variances and will not follow the normal MSA process. Therefore, we anticipate that 100% of this project will be funded through the Non - motorized Pilot Program as administered through the Transit for Livable Communities. PROJECT SCHEDULE: We anticipate that this project can be completed during the summer of 2009 if the federal review process does not take more than 3 months. FEASIBILITY: A public discussion still needs to take place regarding the loss of parking along Wooddale Avenue and along West 54th Street. However, the City recently removed parking from Interlachen Boulevard / Blake Road from Vernon Avenue to the City limits; approximate length of 1.5 miles in order to accommodate bike lanes. The project is feasible if the MNDOT Bikeway Facility Design Manual standards are utilized. ATTACHMENTS: • Bike Boulevard Analysis • Cost Estimate • High tech pavement marking information Page 8 of 8 70th St. it , hvui I W if A Iranclon "low r o, quare Im w I I "EDINA ADE PROMEN nter t IN WO E d i n a M i n n e s o t a Hazelton Rd tj A4 ®R, 2 Urban Design Plan 'k ,S h 'n e' Siarl. Yorktown Retail Centdr < 65 -F1 20 lip, imp t '6w tD r51" k a o it! 411, IFF 111"If w I 9ti %wow 4I t Sri Irk • ro, , r/. ro, York St. Underpass mob, Option D: Stream with Separate Pipe to Centennial Lakes . The stream would flow over a weir to Centennial Lakes and would be pumped back up to the ponds. The storm water from the ponds would overflow into a pipe to Centennial Lakes. Before a decision can be made regarding which storm water circulation option to select, more engineering studies need to be com- pleted. The York Avenue underpass is a major fea- ture in the Promenade area and it serves as a passage and gateway to the Promenade area from the east. Since it is also a link in the regional trail system, it needs to accommo- date pedestrians as well as bicyclists. ------------------------------ Existing Conditions The existing York Avenue underpass at York- town Park (top photos in Figure 44) is con- structed from large concrete drainage pipes. It has a bituminous paved path, no lighting, and no other amenities. The embankments at both ends of the under- pass, have timber retaining walls and a linear floor drain is located at the east end of the underpass. ---------------------------------------------------------- Design Recommendations The primary issues with the existing York Avenue underpass are: • Its small size — horizontally and vertically • Lack of lighting • Lack of design amenities and features A number of options were considered for im- proving and upgrading the underpass: 1. Repair and upgrade the existing un- derpass 2. Reconstruct it with a larger pre -cast concrete box culvert 3. Reconstruct it as two small bridges In order to meet the objective of serving pe- destrians as well as bicyclists, to provide more natural light in the underpass, and to improve its image and appearance, the rec- ommendation is to reconstruct it as two small bridges. The diagram in Figure 44 illustrates the con- cept for the two parallel bridges. The two photos of the Centennial Lakes bridges indi- cate the type of design treatments that could be used for the bridges, in order to enhance the appearance of the underpass and to pro- vide continuity with the Centennial Lakes de- sign theme. The new underpass would be developed to accommodate a pedestrian path and a bicy- cle trail and it could include special features, such as bridge lighting and public art. One of the key recommendations for the path system, as discussed in Chapter III, is to con- struct two pedestrian and bicyclist over- passes over France Avenue, one at 69th Street and one at 72nd Street. It is also recommended to use a maximum 5% slope (a rise of no more than 1' in 20') for the approach ramps, which would require 420' long approaches on each side of the two bridges, in order to provide a 17' -4" clearance under the bridges and 3' -8" for the bridge deck structure. Using a 5% slope eliminates the need for special hand rails and for inter- mediate landings. Using such long bridge approaches could work in these two overpass locations, since the origin and destination points are primarily areas that are located a block or more away from France Avenue. Edina Promenade UM Urban Design Plan July 2007 •w Proposed Double - Bridge Underpass Centennial Lakes Bridges Theme 60 Frgare 44 York Avenue Underpass Design Promenade Design (10 EDINA VROMENADE Urban Design Plan July 2007 1 On the east side the primary destination is the central spine and the Promenade / Cen- tennial Lakes path system. On the west side the origin / destination points are the regional trail that extends to the west and the residen- tial neighborhoods located to the west. This section presents some preliminary loca- tion and configuration options for the two overpass bridges. However, more in -depth studies are required to further define the ex- act bridge types to be used and the approach alignments and configurations. ----------------------------------------------------------- Overpass Design The overpass bridges at France Avenue could be designed in various styles utilizing a number of techniques. Figures 45 and 46 provide examples of various bridge types that might be applicable. They range from a very basic, pre- fabricated arch truss bridge to highly complex, yet dynamic cable -stay or artistically clad bridges. The France Avenue overpasses would be located in a very prominent location in the City of Edina and, therefore, might warrant special consideration and treatment. -------------------------------------------------- Overpass Configuration Options For the 72nd Street crossing, there are a number of ways of how the bridge and the bridge approaches could be configured. Fig- ures 47 through 50 provide concept diagrams of how the overpasses could be aligned and configured. For the 69th Street crossing, there is essentially only one option, bottom plan in Figure 50, although there may be a number of variations of how the approaches might be aligned. Each diagram identifies the three compo- nents required for the overpass. ■ Retained Fill Segments. Typically, some of the lower segments of the bridge approaches would be constructed on fill with sloped embankments or retaining walls. These are shown in yellow. ■ Structured Approach Segments. At a certain height the retained fill con- struction would become uneconomical and the bridge approach design would convert to a pylon supported structured section. These are shown in orange. ■ Bridge Segments. The segment over the roadway would be a true bridge. These are shown in red. The diagrams also indicate approach paths for accessing the overpasses. All the overpasses are assumed to be ap- proximately 10' wide, although this would need to be revisited in final design. The ob- jective would be to provide enough room for pedestrians and bicyclists, as well as small machines for cleaning and clearing snow from the bridges. For accommodating the small machines, straight bridge approaches would be preferable over switchbacks. The concept plans show the bridge ap- proaches and the bridges only. If desired, stairs could be added where needed for addi- tional direct access to the bridges. 72nd Street Options Following is a brief description of each of the six overpass options for the 72 Id Street cross- ing. Actually, there are a number of other permutations, since some of the features in each of the options could be mixed and matched or interchanged between the op- tions. Unless the bridge approach on the west side can be fitted into the 72nd Street ROW, prop- erty may need to be acquired or an easement may need to be obtained from the Sunrise Assisted Living property. In addition, property may need to be ac- quired, or an easement may need to be ob- tained on the east side form the Home Store property and, depending upon the alignment option selected, also from the Byerly's prop- erty. Ldina Promenade uns Urban Design Plan Jcrly 2007 m Cable -Stay Bridge - Midtown Greenway F7.jmd , -21 Arch Cable - Edina Suspension Bridge - Boston t Steel Truss - Minneapolis July 2007 E D I N A � PPROMENADE * 1M Urban Design Plan 62 Arch Cable - Denver Wood Truss - St. Cloud Figure 45 Overpass Examples Group 9 Overpass Concepts Ornamental Truss - St. Paul Ornamented Beam - Kansas City Arch Truss - Rochester July 2007 EDI NA PROMENADE Urban Design Plan (10 63 Arts TYws - Paris Specially Clad Beam - Chicago Switchback Ramps - Rochester Figure 46 Overpass Examples Group 2 Overpass Concepts s Sunrise w t �E Irr Assisted ., Living J r r r. r � 7200'0ri Franc} Office Bldg. �a > c, Option 1 - Plan - 1:20 Ramps (5 %) � 0 100 300 Feet 4e" t - hafts INK gz, • Sur,r�se •. , ,4 ,,..,., -- . ,; 7200 On Franc ~, O%kce Blgd , 64 Figure 47 Overpass at 72ns St. Option 9 Overpass Concepts Legend o Bridge Segment (Special Bridge Structure) o Bridge Approach Segment (Pylon Supports) o Retained Fill Segment (Retaining Walls) Access Paths (40 EDINA 11110n11 NAF)l Urban Design Plan July 2007 -�: Wt' a � , liaz Iton d. ' K _ Sunrise . -1' 1 E . = - Assist J �: Living g Byerly's , NA ns 150' 211, ! 7200`On Franc) + Office Bldg. ' - Q U Gapa9ne` Dom: * 7% 4w`. ` Option 2 - 1:20 Ramps (5 %) "72nd ivwj;+ nrwn�w d t n se '- E Assi'ste`d ,r-,, Living �, 1')0' 100 x 3�+. 10 R �o 7200`Ori Franc) + Office B_Idg. Option 3 - 1:20 Ramps (5 %) 0 100 300 Feet 1 61 1 ' c LL " Wit' t �idt� _.. •s.�e� M 65 0 100 300 Feet Figure 48 Overpass at 72ns St. Options 2 & 3 Overpass Concepts Legend D Bridge Segment (Special Bridge Structure) i� Bridge Approach Segment (Pylon Supports) o Retained Fill Segment (Retaining Walls) (...3 Access Paths (SO EDINA Urban Design Plan July 2007 w �" Livi .. 120'' 7200'On'Francj Office Bldg. f .b 1 � Option 4 - 1:20 Ramps (5 %) - -; �I w5t 1 unnse . • E ssisted Liv ing .. 100 4�.' � �`�,, � 120 " - x03 60' .' rt�` 72nd St. f1 'tw Afr. rn • j 4 60' 0' F7200'Ori F.rancl Office Bldg. 0 100 300 Feet 1 Byerly's 11+ A-010=0 o Home Store .1 ® 0 100 300 Feet 66 Figure 49 Overpass at 72ns St. Options 4 & 5 Overpass Concepts Legend o Bridge Segment (Special Bridge Structure) L---j Bridge Approach Segment (Pylon Supports) o Retained Fill Segment (Retaining Walls) Access Paths (10 EDINA PROMENADE Urban Design Plan July 2007 tTRS 1 � �t' t` t � r �• j, � 1 r M17 i0k LL Option 5 - 1:20 Ramps (5 %) 0 100 300 Feet 1 Byerly's 11+ A-010=0 o Home Store .1 ® 0 100 300 Feet 66 Figure 49 Overpass at 72ns St. Options 4 & 5 Overpass Concepts Legend o Bridge Segment (Special Bridge Structure) L---j Bridge Approach Segment (Pylon Supports) o Retained Fill Segment (Retaining Walls) Access Paths (10 EDINA PROMENADE Urban Design Plan July 2007 tTRS CM off M r< 1 l .•n►. 7200�On Francl Office Bldg. r ,Ahb n4 „r to - "*111% €w - her pc Ga11a9 ...d'! lO Option 6 - 1:12 Ramps (8.3 %) 61 a U u- ® 0 100 300 Feet i ' <> k Southdale r 'C Shopping ILL Office Center Bldgs. r o. • k: . - _ P, i._ 69th St. Option 1 - 1:20 Ramps (5 %) wb w 00 300 Feet 67 Figure 50 Overpass at 72ns St. - Option 6 & 69th St. Option Overpass Concepts Legend o Bridge Segment (Special Bridge Structure) o Bridge Approach Segment (Pylon Supports) o Retained Fill Segment (Retaining Walls) - -�7 Access Paths (10 EDINA PROMENAN Urban Design Plan July 2007 UM r \ � n Sunrise e c ,' Assiste`d >.r Living '�►•i 200 ....150 72nd St 7200�On Francl Office Bldg. r ,Ahb n4 „r to - "*111% €w - her pc Ga11a9 ...d'! lO Option 6 - 1:12 Ramps (8.3 %) 61 a U u- ® 0 100 300 Feet i ' <> k Southdale r 'C Shopping ILL Office Center Bldgs. r o. • k: . - _ P, i._ 69th St. Option 1 - 1:20 Ramps (5 %) wb w 00 300 Feet 67 Figure 50 Overpass at 72ns St. - Option 6 & 69th St. Option Overpass Concepts Legend o Bridge Segment (Special Bridge Structure) o Bridge Approach Segment (Pylon Supports) o Retained Fill Segment (Retaining Walls) - -�7 Access Paths (10 EDINA PROMENAN Urban Design Plan July 2007 UM Option 1. In this option (Figure 47), the bridge approach on the west side would me- ander or `snake' in order to create enough distance for the 420' -long approach. This would require a greater easement from and would have a greater impact on the Sunrise Assisted Living property. The bridge would be positioned diagonally across the intersection. In order to shorten the bridge span, it might be feasible to locate a pylon in the median of France Avenue. Option 2. In this option (top plan in Figure 48), the bridge approach on the west side is straightened out, but it curves around the corner at Lymar Lane. The bridge configuration would be the same as in Option 1. Option 3. In this option (bottom plan in Fig- ure 48), a switchback is introduced on the west side. This would require some ease- ment from the Sunrise Assisted Living prop- erty. It would also be less desirable since the west side approach would be more difficult to clean and, since people do not like to back- track, fewer people might be inclined to use the overpass. The bridge configuration would be the same as in Option 1. Option 4. In this option (top plan in Figure 49), the bridge would be aligned with the north side of 72nd Street, which would create a shorter overall bridge, but would have an impact on the southwest corner of the Byerly's property. In Option 4, any one of the previously dis- cussed configurations for the west side ap- proach could be used. Option S. This option is similar to Option 4, except that the bridge would be aligned on pylons along the median of France Avenue. The feasibility of this option would need to be tested, due to potential undesirable impacts on the traffic operations along France Ave- nue. Option 6. This option illustrates a potential overpass configuration using steeper bridge approaches. The approaches would have a slope of 8.3 %, or a rise of 1' in 12', which would require special handrails and a landing every 25'. 69th Street Overpass For the 69th Street overpass the simplest op- tion would be to locate the bridge approaches along the north side of Valley View Road on the west side and along the north side of 69th Street on the east side. The two issues with this option are that it would require a long structured approach on the west side, in order to clear the driveway access to the office complex and the Think Bank, and it would require a special pedes- trian crossing of Valley View Road, at the north end. An option, in order to mitigate the need for the special pedestrian crossing, might be to extend the structured approach, on the west side, south across Valley View Road and to descend to grade on the southwest side of Valley View Road. ............................ ............................... Overpass Conclusions At this point it is difficult to make recommen- dations regarding which might be the pre- ferred overpass configurations, until further more detailed studies and evaluations are completed. 72nd Street Overpass As was mentioned before, the straightest configurations would be the most preferable, however, they may have impacts on adjoining properties and on traffic operations. The key issues that need to be addressed for the 72nd Street overpass are: ■ Feasibility of fitting the west side ap- proach in the 72nd Street ROW, or getting Edina Promenade UM Urban Design Plan July 2007 easements from the Sunrise Assisted Living property. • Feasibility of getting easements from the Home .Store, and, potentially, also from the Byerly's properties. • Feasible of placing. one or more support pylons in the median of France Avenue: 69th Street Overpass . The key issues that need to be-addressed for the 69th Street overpass are: Feasibility of fitting the approaches and bridge supports in the Valley View Road and 69th Street ROWs. ■ On which side of Valley View Road should the west side approach ramps be located. Following is a preliminary construction cost estimate for the proposed Edina Promenade site improvements. The estimate is based, on the concept design developments presented, in this report. The detail in the cost estimate represents the level of refinement that has been completed to date. The cost estimate data,- presented in the four cost estimate tables, includes a cost estimate for each of the three segments, identified be- low; and a summary of all the costs, including the new York Avenue underpass. Segment Approximate Length North Segment 700' Middle Segment 1,000' South Segment 1,100' For comparison,, the approximate lengths of the North Park segment in the Centennial Lakes Park is approximately 700' from the north edge of the Park to the Parklawn Ave- nue bridge. Various options exist .for staging the project. The project could be implemented by seg- ment, or it could be •implemented by con- structing the bicyclist path first for r the full length of the project' and -then proceeding to implement the rest of the r project. Also, since the special feature areas call for including.public art public art,components could be implemented incrementally, depend- ing, upon the available funding and the arts program requirements. Edina Promenade UM Urban Design Plan July. 2007