Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2011-09-20 COUNCIL MEETING
MOVING PLANET A GLOBAL DAY OF ACTION TO MOVE BEYOND FOSSIL FUELS JOIN THE MOVEMENT! Walk, bike, skate, and wheel to rally to action on our climate crisis W 0 0"4'�0 � Y 2PM, SATURDAY, 912412011 AT THE STATE CAPITOL MN350.ORG Hennepin County Fact Sheet Hennepin County Hennepin County - Fast Facts Public Aff 09/11 Media contacts Basic stats Carol Allis, Public Affairs • Hennepin is the 33rd largest county in the U.S. by population. 612 - 348 -8536 • Largest of Minnesota's 87 counties in population, budget and estimated property value. Website • 611 square miles; more than 100 lakes; 45 cities, one township, one unorganized territory (Fort Snelling) and the Metropolitan Airport. wwwhennepin.us • 1.2 million residents — approximately 22 percent of the population of Minnesota and 41 percent of the metropolitan population. Approximately Fast facts one -third of Hennepin residents live in Minneapolis, the county seat. » Hennepin County has 1.2 million residents — approximately 22 percent of the population of Minnesota. » Approximately 44 percent of the county's budget goes for health and human services. » Approximately 41.5 percent of the county's annual budget is supported by property taxes. » Hennepin is home to one -third of the state's jobs and approximately 42,000 businesses. • Median family income: $61,387 • Median age: 38 • Ninety -two percent of residents 25 and older are high school graduates — one of the highest graduation rates in the nation. Forty -three percent have a bachelor's degree or higher. • Racially and ethnically diverse — approximately 40 percent of the state's non- white and foreign -born populations live in Hennepin. • Home to one -third of the state's jobs; 11 Fortune 500 companies; and approximately 42,000 businesses, including many of Minnesota's largest employers — Allina Health System, Best Buy, Cargill, Carlson Companies, General Mills, Mall of America, Medtronic, Super Valu, United Health Group, University of Minnesota, US Bank and Target Corporation. • Median single - family home residential market value: $215,000. Governance • Governed by a seven - member Board of Commissioners, elected by district for staggered four -year terms. Each commissioner represents a district of more than 160,000 residents. The county attorney and sheriff also are elected; the county administrator is appointed by the board. • Approximately 7,400 full -time employees. • $1.6- billion 2011 budget. • About 44 percent of the budget goes for health and human services, including uncompensated care at Hennepin County Medical Center and services for vulnerable populations, including veterans, seniors and people who are disabled. Hennepin is the state's largest provider of care to indigent and vulnerable populations. Capital Improvements 8.6 % General Government 19.0% Health 14.7% Libraries 4.4% Public Works 8.1% Public Safety 16.3% Human Services 28.9 % Expenditures continues on back Media images For high - resolution versions of these or other county images please call 611348 -3848. HCMC Emergency Medical Services r ti r � i!T Hennepin County Library - Minneapolis Central Hennepin County - Fast Facts • Approximately 41.5 percent of s 9 % the county's annual budget is supported by property taxes. The rest comes from federal and state dollars, fees for services and k4l.7�5'4':Y Fees &Services licenses, and other sources. 19.2% Highlights State • Hennepin is considered one of the 9.9% 1W11 n% nation's best - managed counties, with a triple -A credit rating from Revenue all three rating agencies. The county has maintained this rating since the 1970s, reflecting strong financial and operational stability. The top rating also keeps the cost of financing capital projects as low as possible — a substantial savings to taxpayers. • Hennepin County Medical Center, one of the nation's premier public teaching and research hospitals and a Level One Trauma Center, is repeatedly ranked as one of America's best hospitals by U.S. News and World Report. HCMC exceeded 490,000 inpatient and outpatient visits in 2010 and has the most active emergency department in Minnesota, with 96,000 emergency cases and 58,000 ambulance runs a year. Approximately one -third of medical residents and students in Minnesota received all or part of their medical education and training at HCMC last year. HCMC operates as a subsidiary under the auspices of the County Board, with operational governance by Hennepin Healthcare System Inc., a public corporation. • Hennepin County Library is recognized as one of the top libraries in the United States. The 41- library system offers more than 5 million books, CDs, DVDs, electronic resources and other items in more than 40 languages, and has 1,695 computers available to the public. In 2010 there were an estimated 5.8 million in- person visits and almost 20 million visits to the library website. • Hennepin responds to more than 15,000 child abuse calls a year; collects more than $112 million a year for child support for more than 73,000 children; and provides social services to nearly one in four county residents. • Hennepin is a nationally recognized leader in environmental protection, including a robust Green Government program that includes waste reduction, recycling, environmentally preferable purchasing, green building design and energy conservation. As a founding member of Cool Counties, Hennepin has committed to an 80- percent reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from county operations by 2050. • Hennepin has one of the highest recycling rates in the nation. Approximately 41 percent of county residential and commercial waste is recycled or composted, and about one -third is processed in the county's waste -to- energy facility, which processes 365,000 tons of waste a year. • The Sheriff's Office serves all cities in the county, providing 24 -hour emergency dispatch for 19 area fire departments and 23 law enforcement agencies in 36 communities. Last year dispatch processed more than 594,919 phone calls, including 228,355 emergency calls to 911. • Hennepin operates the largest local corrections system in the state — approximately 36,700 adult and juvenile offenders under supervision (on probation or in correctional facilities). • Hennepin maintains more than 2,100 lane miles of roadways and 145 bridges. • Hennepin Taxpayer Services manages seven service centers (licenses, birth certificates, passports, etc.), which conducted more than 1 million transactions last year; and oversees elections for approximately 700,000 registered voters. • Hennepin County Public Records manages a library of more than 14 million documents and 184,000 certificates of title, with approximately 240,000 documents recorded last year. k ULI Minnesota MN GreenStep Cities & Regional Indicators Project Edina City Council September 20th Rick Carter, FAIA, LEED AP BD +C LHB & Michael orange Participating Cities Falcon Heights, MN St. Louis Park, MN Edina, MN [new] A/St. Louis Park N o e tit MN GreenStep Cities Best Practices Best Practice Actions ].Enter baseline information into the Minnesota B3 database and continue entering monthly energy use data from city - owned buildings. 2.Audit (or when cost - effective, recommission) all city -owned buildings in the bottom third of the 133 energy performance ranking and implement a majority of energy efficiency opportunities that have a payback under 5 years. 3.Complete energy efficiency improvements in at least one city, school or park district building (in addition to buildings addressed in action 2) via retrofit and retro - /re- commissioning, with financing at attractive interest rates under MN's PBEEEP program or related lease- purchase financing, energy performance contracting, or other cost - justified program. 4.Participate in other state or utility programs that provide rebates or co- funding for energy efficiency improvements to public buildings. 5.Document that the operation, or construction / remodeling, of at least one city -owned building (excluding park buildings) meets or qualifies for a green building standard. 6.Create an internal loan fund for making public building improvements based on an energy or green building standard. 7.lnstall in at least one public building at least one of the following energy efficiency measures: a. A distributed energy technology: micro - turbine, fuel cell, reciprocating engine. b. A ground- source, closed loop geothermal system where net greenhouse gases are less than those generated by the system being replaced. 3 Study scale City wide versus organization data Falcon Heights 4fW ............ ■: St. Louis Park Iw.�..r i++n u•a..nn,a rA�w 1. ' " "__... -, —.. � ..•a.. I.4.nwYW �� M1ww.wm Mw Edina M 4L JL • • t • y C • it...• i i • • • • .... • • • • ..... • ..... • • .. •r.• Scope of Work Establish the feasibility of this approach. Collect the last two years of data for benchmarking. Establish a process for collecting data for the next two years. Evaluate the specific best management practices (BMP) selected by each city and correlate them to the outcomes being measured. Produce a final report that measures each metric individually (i.e. kBTUs, gallons, vehicle miles traveled, etc.) as well as in total dollars and tons of carbon. The report will include data on a per capita basis as well. Urban land Institute innesota GreenStep Cities 5 Units &Normalization BTUs - Energy Gallons -Water VMT - Vehicle Miles Traveled Pounds -Waste All can be converted to $ and CO2 All can be normalized to population and /or jobs Edina -Wide Carbon Baseline Assessment 2008 - 2010 Completed 08 -8 -2011 CO,e CO,e CO,e 2008 Metric (tonnes /yr)" 2009 Metric (tonnes /yr)„ 2010 Metric (tonnes /yr)17 Population 787 204,219 647 Residents (Capita)' 48,169 200,029 114,871 49,491 106,307 C &I 47,941 235,440 Jobs' 49,202 Total 603,885 46,893 584,913 320,629 47,544 7,937 _ Households 21,285 177 Res 21,357 111,973 1,995,306 20,672 C &I Area (15.7 square miles) Res /sq. mi.1 3,068 1 3,152 1 97,258 3,054 3,876,094 Energy Cooling Degree Days" Electricity (MWh /yr)" Heating Degree Days`" Therms (Dth /yr)II' Total Energy (MBtu /yr)' Total Energy (kBtu /Capita /day)" Water (gallon Inches Rainfall`' Water (gallons /yr) Res C &I Total Res. Water (gallons /capita /day) Res C &I Water (gallons /job /day) C&II 787 204,219 647 397,925 Res 200,029 114,871 195,768 106,307 C &I 403,856 235,440 389,145 214,322 Total 603,885 350,311 584,913 320,629 5,555,920 7,937 _ 1 7,780 177 Res 2,051,118 111,973 1,995,306 108,926 C &I 1,824,977 99,627 1,781,574 97,258 Total 3,876,094 211,600 3,776,880 206,184 Res 2,733,617 226,843 2,663,266 215,233 C &I 3,202,933 335,068 3,109,338 311,580 Total 5,936,550 561,911 5,772,604 526,813 Res 155 1 4.7 147 4.3 C&II 182 1 7.0 1 172 6.3 Inches Rainfall`' Water (gallons /yr) Res C &I Total Res. Water (gallons /capita /day) Res C &I Water (gallons /job /day) C&II 25.5 204,219 26.4 397,925 1,777,098,832 602,144 1,587,197,388 7,002 332,892, 530 1,820,922 331,293,093 1,680,484 2,109, 991,363 3,501,406 1,918,490,480 2,517,717 101 3,038,203 88 5,555,920 19 1 11 19 177 1,000 204,219 102,201 397,925 201,792 602,144 335,470 7,002 1,820,922 99,406 1,680,484 91,739 3,501,406 191,145 2,517,717 221,038 3,038,203 323,324 5,555,920 544,362 151 4.5 177 6.6 38.7 1,644,691,117 317,822,056 1,962,513,173 94 18 Edina -Wide Carbon Baseline Assessment 2008 - 2010 Completed 08 -8 -2011 CO,e CO,e CO,e 2008 Metric (tonnes /yr)" 2009 Metric (tonnes /yr)' 2010 Metric (tonnes /yr)" Population Residents (Capita)' 48,169 49,491 47,941 Jobs` 49,202 46,893 47,544 Households 21,285 21,357 20,672 Area (15.7 square miles) Res /sq. mi. 3,068 3,152 3,054 Waste (pounds) Recycled Incinerated Landfill Total Waste (pounds /capita /yr) Recycled Incinerated Landfill Total Waste PPD (pounds /person /day) 49,256,803 48,521,191 46,726,894 42,694,717 5,038 38,026,406 4,487 38,517,194 4,545 30,225,460 5,164 30,065,643 5,137 34,482,909 5,891 122,176,981 10,202 116,613,245 9,624 119,726,996 10,437 1,022.6 980.4 1,001.5 886.4 768.3 827.4 627.5 607.5 617.5 2,536.4 0.21 2,356.3 0.19 2,497.4 0.22 6.9 6.5 6.8 Travel (VMT) Travel (VMT) per Capita /day 29 6.69 28 6.46 29 6.60 Bike Counts Bikers /day 43 44 35 Iota I LO.e (tonnes) CO;e /yr Total 894,566 856,240 871,325 CO;e /yr Total per Capita 18.6 17.3 17.9 City Data Heights St. Louis Park F Energy Residential kBTU /person /day Energy Commercial kBTU / job / day 151.0 Water Residential gal. / person / day 177.0 gal. / job / day 82.0 Water Commercial VMT miles / person / day 19.0 Waste pounds / person / day I 28.5 7.1 6.7 6.7 Heights St. Louis Park Edina alcon 86.0 116.0 151.0 214.5 207.0 177.0 39.0 82.0 94.5 118.5 47.5 19.0 16.5 27.0 28.5 7.1 6.7 6.7 All data is an average of 2008 & 2009 data. 2010 data pending. 6 Edina M 160 140 120 100 2008 182 2010 —177- 2009 —172— J a _0 00 Z N J m Q -{ j M w 20 O V M 2008 155 2010 —151- 2009 —147 - 0 0 N a� Z� z� W om Nm W = N E NE R Gy. FAST FACTS POPULATION: 47,425 i iii -1. 1 -1 -1. — nn i AREA: 16 sq mi —1. cn —n Image source: Flickr 120 100 �11101 Me UK' NO] x Edina gallons / person (job) / day WATER Image source: flickr 2008 101 2010 -94 - 2009 - 88 - 00 C) CD "Y b o O, 00 C) a) Ln 00 2008 0 & M 2009 19 -J < 2010 18 LU 0 Ln L—U ---------- - WATER Image source: flickr CO2 Equivalency by-City Falcon Heights ENERGY WASTE 77% 2% TRAVEL 21% WATER WATER N/A N/A Emissions by Unit Total Emissions - 93,514 tons St. Louis Park Edina ENERGY WASTE ENERGY WASTE 63% 2% 62% 1% TRAVEL TRAVEL 35% 37% WATER N/A Emissions by Unit Total Emissions - 696,091 tons Emissions by Unit Total Emissions — 856,240 tons Data: 2009 12 Energy Use by Sector Falcon Heights C&I 65% RES. 35% Energy Residential - 176,283 kBTU Commercial / Industrial - 325,030 kBTU St. Louis Park Edina C&I C&I 40% 34% R ES. RES. 60% 66% Woo Energy Residential - 1,844,249 kBTU Commercial / Industrial - 1,212,270 kBTU Energy Residential - 2,663,266 kBTU Commercial / Industrial - 1,345,580 kBTU Data: 2009 13 Water Use by Sector Falcon Heights C &I 75% Res. 25% St. Louis Park C &I 33% Res. 67% 00 x Edina Res. 83% C&I 17% Water Water Water Residential - 81,335,525 gal. Residential - 1,371,540,164 gal. Residential - 1,587,197,388 gal. Commercial / Industrial - 238,537,948 gal. Commercial / Industrial - 669,157,336 gal. Commercial / Industrial - 331,293,093 gal. Data: 2009 14 Projections -Edina 51,000 49,000 47,000 45,000 24,000 22,000 20,000 18,000 59,000 56,000 53,000 50,000 47,000 44,000 46,070 19,860 48,500 47,425 •�"'••••• mot' • . 50,000 49,100 •� A&.. . Population 22,500 21,600 22,000 • . , 20,996 . ............ . ...& .. ...............�............r,. Households 57,400 55,000 52,753 ................ 52,100_ 0. 1990 Data: Metropolitan Council 15 Edina Energy Reduction Goal - Residential Wtu / person / day 200 155 Pop. 47,425 150 100' 50 90 Pop. 50,000 0 c� 2030 ENERGY FAST FACTS POPULATION: 47,425 HOUSEHOLDS: 20,996 AREA: 16 sq mi JOBS: 52,753 . � � OF, .f - _ Image source: Met Council Edina FAST FACTS Energy Reduction Goal - Commercial / Industrial POPULATION: 47,425 HOUSEHOLDS: 20,996 k6tu /job / day 200 150 e, 50 - 182 Jobs: 52,753 0 0 N J Q H z J Q V cc W 90 Jobs: 57,400 0 V V � s 2030 ENERGY AREA: 16 sq mi JOBS: 52,753 Image source: City of Edina Website Metrics in Other Communities Minneapolis, MN St. Paul, MN Duluth, MN Dakota County, MN New Castle, Chappaqua, NY Canada: Whitehorse, Coquitlam, Calgary, Lethbridge, Regina, Clarington, Ottawa, Halifax .C.. �s. ROSEMOUM ass'aa tlal C*nm-ta"stn.l Gty Total 1009 Popol.t, f.nnMd S4. ft. 37.lf77.K7 µ.uS.ot�al tlWtnutt (MWM) 79 249. n..W.el al Ital -al GG (Thouw) 6.771.733 R.•.d.nl ul MMRTU 944.2237 S6 0..•�d.wlul MMOTU P- opt. 43 ii.•d►nl ul GHG (-t) tot.] SO:.MS Calm POO 7.0 Image source: i • We can. measure community -wide data • We can normalize by job and population • There is correlation to the GreenStep B.MPs • Energy is the largest part of the pie • Commercial /Industrial consumption is greater than Residential a �� Next Steps • We can establish targets for each unit • Our comprehensive plans should include these targets • Every, city in the Regional Council of Mayors should collect this data • Communities might be the best scale at which to deal with these -units 20 Sources - 1. Metropolitan Council of the Twin Cities, http://stats.metc.state.mn.us/data-download/DD-start.aspx 2. City of Falcon Heights 3. Minnesota Climatology Working Group, State Climatology Office - DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources 4. Source: County Certification /Annual Report, 2008 and 2009 for Hennepin County. 5. Minnesota Department of Transportation. 6. Heating and Cooling Degree Days from Minneapolis Airport Weather Station (93.22W,44.88N). www.degreedays.net 7. Source for electrical consumption data for residential, commercial & industrial: Xcel Energy. 8. Source for natural gas consumption data for residential, commercial & industrial: CenterPoint Energy. 9. Sources for CO2e estimates are as follows: a) Clean Air Climate Protection (CACP) software, 2009, developed by ICLEI - -Local Governments for Sustainability, as reported in Dakota County's county -wide carbon baseline assessment. b) Final Report, Statewide MSW Composition Study: A Study of Discards in the State of Minnesota, Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, March 2000. C) CO2 emission factors for electricity from Xcel Energy. Emission factors for other greenhouse gases from the International Local Government Greenhouse Gas Emissions Analysis Protocol produced by the United Nations, ICLEI - Local Governments for Sustainability and The Climate Registry. 21 AGENDA JOINT WORK SESSION EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND ENERGY AND ENVIRONEMENT COMMISSION CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA COMMUNITY ROOM SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 5:30 P.M. I. .,Call To Order II. _ Benchmark Report - Rick Carter - ULI Pilot Within A Pilot And B3 Data Base III. Recycling & Solid Waste Working Group A. Proposed 1300 Licensing Ordinance Amendments (Approved by EEC 6 -9 -11) And Proposed Tonnage Report Form (Revised Form Of 9 -14 -11 EEC Per Hauler Comments) B. Recommendations For Municipal Recycling 1. City Park Recycling Bins Recommendation (Approved by EEC 7- 21 -11) 2. Resolution On Bottled Water And Municipal Organics Recycling (Approved by EEC 8- 11 -11) Resolved: Establish A City -Wide Facility Recycling Policy Stating That Only Compostable Tableware Will Be Used, That Bottled Water Will Be Reduced, And That Organic Composting Will Be Implemented. Note That The 2012 City Facility Solid Waste And Recycling RFP Will Take This Into Consideration In Order To Accomplish Greenstep #22 Sub Step 1a (Overall Waste Reduction In City Operations) - IV. Turf Management Task Force Report (Approved by EEC 7- 21 -1.1 And Considered by 9 -13 -11 Pk Bd With Comments From Community Health Committee From 9- 9 -11): V. Air Quality Working Group A. Proposed 850.07 Drive Through Ordinance Amendments (Approved by EEC 8- 11 -11) B. No Engine Idling Sign Proposal (Approved by EEC 8- 11 -11) C. Resolution Requesting Conversion Of Centrum VI. Water Quality Working Group A. Coal Tar Ordinance Proposal (Approved by ECC 9 -8 -11) Agenda /Edina City Council September 20, 2011 Page 2 VII. Energy working Group — Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) VIII. Adjournment U The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952-927-886172 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Tues Sept 20 Work Session With Energy & Environment Commission 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Sept 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Oct 4 _ Work Session — Human Services Task Force Funding Rec 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Oct 4 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Oct 18 Work Session — Review Proposal City Economic Dev. & Svc. 5:30 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Tues Oct 18 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Nov 1 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Nov 8 ELECTION DAY — POLLS OPEN 7:00 A.M. UNTIL 8:00 P.M. Tues Nov 15 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Thur Nov 24 THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Fri Nov 25 DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Dec 6 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Tues Dec 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Fri Dec 24 CHRISTMAS HOLDIAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Fri Dec 31 NEW YEAR'S HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed IV Work Session Item No. III. A Proposed Edina City Ordinance Amendments for Section 1300 — Collection and Disposal of Refuse and Recyclables Approved by EEC 6 -9 -11 PURPOSE: The Recycling and Solid Waste Working Group of the Edina Energy and Environment Commission makes the following recommendations for amendments to Edina City code 1300 for the purpose of reducing residential waste, increasing residential recycling, and for the convenience of Edina residents. The amendments also enable Edina to comply with GreenStep Cities reporting requirements. 1300.01 Haulers to be Licensed. No person shall engage in hauling, conveying or collecting refuse, as defined in Section 705 of this Code, or recyclables,.as defined in Section 715 of this Code unless that person holds a valid license issued under this Section. No license shall be issued to haul, convey or collect refuse or recyclables,in any district established pursuant to Subsection 705.09 or Subsection 705.10, except an exclusive license shall be applied for and issued pursuant to this Section to the .person authorized -by the City to haul, convey, or collect, refuse orrecyclables in a district so established. 1300.02 License Procedure and Fee; Insurance; Bond. Subd. 1 Procedure and Fee. Section 160 of this Code, including the penalty provisions, shall apply to all licenses required by this Section and to the holders of such licenses, except that licenses shall be granted or denied by the Sanitarian. In addition to the information required by Section 160, the application for license or renewal of license shall be accompanied by a description of the types and makes of vehicles used for collection, a schedule of the charges to be made in accordance with the requirements of Subd. 4 of this Subsection, the frequency of service to be rendered and full information as to where and how the material collected will be disposed of. The application-shall be accompanied by the fee set forth in Section 185 of this Code. Subd. 2 Insurance. Applicants for licenses or renewals of licenses shall file with each application a certificate of insurance under which there is coverage as to each vehicle to be used, for the entire term of the license applied for, for loss or damage to persons in the amount of $100,000 for each person and $300,000 for each accident, and for loss or damage to property in the amount of $50,000. Each policy shall provide that it shall not be canceled, or terminated or modified without first giving notice to the City. Note:.These limits are insufficient to adequately indemnify the City'of,Edina. City Staff needs to recommend raisin); these to adequate limits. Subd. 3 Bond. Before obtaining any license under this Section; except an exclusive license.issued in a district established by Subsection 705.09 or 705.10 of this Code, the applicant shall file with the Clerk a bond naming theCity as.obligee in the penal sum of $1,000 for each vehicle the applicant uses to collect refuse or recyclables in the'City. The Bond shall be conditioned that the applicant shall save the City harmless for all actions, damages and expenses arising from:the applicant's failure to comply with any provisions of,this Code. Before granting any exclusive license for a district established by Subsection 705.09 or Subsection 705.10 of this Code, the exclusive licensee shall have on file with the Clerk a bond naming the City as'obligee in the penal sum of not less than $25,000 for each district, or in the penal sum of not less than $100,000. if the district covers the whole of the City. The bond shall be.conditioned that the applicant shall save the City harmless for all action, damages and expenses arising from failure.to comply with any provisions of this Section or exclusive license. The bond shall be submitted on forms provided by the Clerk. The surety shall be a corporation duly authorized to act as such under laws of the State. The term of the bond shall be continuing and shall not terminate until 30 days.after the 1 Work Session Item No. III. A date when the Clerk receives written notice of the termination by registered mail. Note: These limits are insufficient to adequately indemnify the City of Edina. City Staff needs to recommend raising these to adequate limits Subd. 4 Volume Based Fees. The applicant shall submit a schedule of Refuse collection charges, exclusive of Source Separated Compostable Materials (SSCM) to the city Sanitarian. Said schedule shall be in direct relationship to the volume or weight of Refuse collected from each customer, exclusive of the SSCM collection process. 1300.03 Decals to be Placed on Vehicles. Whenever a license or renewal has been issued, the Sanitarian shall furnish the licensee a decal for each vehicle. The decal shall be worded as to signify that the vehicle is licensed by the City. The licensee shall apply the decal to the forward left side of the body of each vehicle licensed. 1300.04 Vehicles. Subd. 1 Specifications. The body of every vehicle licensed under this Section shall be constructed entirely of metal, or the space in the vehicle in which refuse or recyclables is kept shall be completely lined with metal. All joints shall be closed so that no dripping or leaking or drain off of water, liquid or any substance can occur. The loading space shall be provided with a tight metal hood having an opening fitted with metal doors, or shall be provided with a heavy tarpaulin or equivalent cover fitted with eyes, grommets, tie ropes or hooks so that the cover can be held securely over the loaded refuse. Refuse and recyclables shall be loaded so that none of the materials can jar loose and fall from the vehicle. Loose paper and other materials shall be secured so they cannot be dispersed by wind or fall from the vehicle. Subd. 2 Cleanliness. Every licensed vehicle used for collecting refuse shall be steam cleaned at least every week to prevent persistent odors, and shall be steam cleaned before being used for any other purpose. Subd. 3 Marking of Vehicles. Every vehicle used to collect refuse shall have the name of the owner or operator on the body, or placed on a durable metal or wood plaque which shall be fastened to the body when the vehicle is used for collecting refuse or recyclables. Subd. 4 Containers Used in Vehicle. Containers used to store or carry refuse in any licensed vehicle shall comply with the requirements of Subsection 705.02. 1300.05 Collection of Compostable Materials. Haulers shall collect from residential customers and segregate from other refuse, all grass clippings and leaves which have been separated from other refuse and placed in compostable bags designed for compostable materials. Haulers shall report to the Sanitarian the amount, by weight, of the leaves and grass clippings delivered to compost disposal sites approved by the County for the four -month periods ending April 30, August 31 and December 31. The reports shall be submitted within 15 days following the end of each four month period. Licensed haulers shall provide to customers, upon a customer's request, a yard waste container with close - fitting top for Grass Clippings, Leaves and /or Source Separated Compostable Materials (SSCM). The containers shall be constructed of non - combustible materials including the cover. The containers shall be at least 30 gallons in size, and at a charge for the container, if any, to be determined by the licensed hauler. 1300.06 Recyclable Collections Service. All persons licensed under this Section who haul, convey or collect refuse from residential buildings containing three or more dwelling units shall offer recyclable collection service to such buildings. 1300.07 Recycling Reports. Within 30 days after the end of each calendar quarter each licensed hauler shall provide the City Sanitarian such information as is then requested by the Sanitarian on forms prescribed by the Sanitarian, relative to the recyclables collected during the period subsequent to the prior report to the City. The report shall include the amounts and kinds of recyclables and the markets used for the sale of, and primary purchaser of, recyclables. 2 Work Session Item No. III. A 1300.08 Service to Residential Properties. Containers kept outside shall be placed and kept in such a manner as not to permit entry of or harborage for animals, insects or other vermin. Haulers providing service to single dwelling unit, double dwelling unit and townhouse properties shall offer to their customers the option of collecting refuse from containers placed for collection at locations on the property other than at the curb. If the customer chooses such an option, the hauler shall collect refuse from the containers and return the empty containers to the location on the property specified by the customer. The hauler may not charge a different rate for collecting refuse at locations on the property other than the curb. 1300.09 Refuse Reports - Within 30 days after the end of each calendar quarter, each licensed hauler shall provide the City Sanitarian on forms prescribed by the Sanitarian, the total weight of refuse collected during the period subsequent to the prior report to the City. History: Ord 1301 codified 1979; amended by 1301 -A1 3 -4 -71, 1301 -A2 11- 25 -81, 1301 -A3 5- 25 -88, 1301 -A4, 6- 14 -89, 1301 -A5 12- 19 -90; Ord 2006 -08, 11 -06 -06 Cross Reference: Sections 160, 185, 705, 715 JUSTIFICATION OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS 1300.02 License Procedure and Fee; Insurance; Bond. — It appears that the insurance and bonding limits have not been revised in many years. These limits are insufficient to adequately protect the City of Edina. City staff needs to recommend an amount sufficient to raise these to adequate limits. Waste Management has a limit of 5 million and has indicated that most haulers carry 1— 3 million. Gary Vierkant indicated that the cost is passed along to the resident such that raising the limit would not be a problem for a hauler. 1300.05 Collection of Compostable Materials — Not all licensed residential haulers currently provide yard waste carts to customers. Such carts are desirable given that the State of Minnesota prohibits non- compostable bags for yard waste. Hauler supplied yard waste carts result in a savings to residents. Allied provides a wheeled 32 gal or a 68 gal yard waste wheeled cart to customers at no charge. Aspen provides a wheeled yard waste cart at a small charge. Garbage Man does not provide a yard waste cart. Suburban — Provides a wheeled yard waste cart at no charge Vierkant provides a wheeled 60 gal cart for yard waste and /or Source Separated Compostable Materials (SSCM) at no charge. Waste Management provides a wheeled yard waste cart at a small charge. 1300.07 Recycling Reports —The current city ordinance makes recycling reports appear as though they need only be generated if requested by the City Sanitarian. In fact, they are required by the 1 -1 -10 City of Edina recycling contract. Reporting requests must not be removed in future recycling contracts, or allowed to be supplied only upon request of the City Sanitarian, given that they are necessary for GreenStep Cities benchmarking and to determine the effectiveness of various recycling initiatives. 1300.09 — Refuse Reports — Edina currently has no requirement for haulers to make reports to the City Sanitarian as to the weight of refuse removed from the City. Such reports are necessary for GreenStep Cities benchmarking and to determine the effectiveness of various waste reduction initiatives. See step #24, Benchmarks and Community Engagement, substep #1, which requires reporting progress annually to community. See also substep #2 - Organize Work Session Item No. III. A goals /outcomes measures from all city plans. City Council, at EEC's recommendation, voted to utilize the Urban Land Institute's (ULI) benchmark methodology, which requires cities to report not only their residential refuse tonnage, but also their municipal and commercial refuse tonnages. Schools are included in the commercial tonnages in the ULI methodology. Limiting the reporting requirement to residential tonnages, would force the City of Edina to extrapolate its commercial refuse tonnages from the Hennepin County data. More accurate data is needed so that if Edina changes licensing requirements in the future relative to residential or commercial requirements, the City of Edina will be able to determine if the ordinance amendments had a positive effect on reducing the amount of refuse collected or not Most haulers use public solid waste tipping sites where their tipping tickets are public information. These haulers have no problem with making reports given that the information is public anyway. Some haulers, such as Allied Waste have private landfills where they take some of their solid waste. This information is not public. But even these haulers use public sites such as the HERC burner some of the time such that not all of their tipping information is private. Most haulers have loads from multiple cities such that they cannot supply an exact weight for each city in the load. Haulers do, however, know the number of sites serviced in each _city in each load, and would be able to submit an estimate. This is an acceptable compromise. 4 Solid Waste Abatement Report City of Edina This report is required by Edina City Code 1300 Licensing requirement. Please complete and submit by the deadlines. Email to: swilmot@ci.edina.mn.us or FAX 952-826-0390 Company Name Applicant nam Licensed number Number of trucks If the refuse removal truck or dumpster provides service to mu' -;es, the weight or yardage may be prorated by to the number of customers serviced. To the best of my ability this information is true a Please sign Type of Solid Waste materials only (pleasp—:-cle): Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) �-*ruction D til Indicate if reporting in: ton es or yards\ First quarter: January, Februp"N' and March mip Anril 10 Waste (CDW) or both andjune" Second q/6�arteicr:"Apri, May� Due July 3\O\ C.DW• Residential Commercial andjune" Second q/6�arteicr:"Apri, May� Due July 3\O\ Third quarter: July, Aug"ustan 'See tuber Due October 30 IVISW CDW Residential Commercial Fourth quarter: October, November and December Due January 30 MSW. CDW . Residential Commercial DW Residential Commercial Third quarter: July, Aug"ustan 'See tuber Due October 30 IVISW CDW Residential Commercial Fourth quarter: October, November and December Due January 30 MSW. CDW . Residential Commercial Recycling Tonnage Report City of Edina Any licensed hauler that collects commercial recycling must report the following information per Edina City Code 1300.07. 1St Quarter due April 30 Paper Containers Other TOTAL TONS January February March February April March /\ Totals rter due July 30 I Fibers April June Totals 3f0 Quarter due Oct. 30 Fibers July September Totals Containers r I ; I k, -r I TOTAL TONS containers Other TOTAL TONS 4th Quarter due Jan. 30 Fibers Containers' Other TOTALTONS October February March November April December Totals \\ ` \ Compostable Materials Any licensed hauler that collectss compostable,'material as defined by Edina City Code 705 must report the following per Edina City Code 1300.05 Due by May 15 Commercial Residential January February March April Totals Due by Sept 15 Commercial Residential May June July August Totals Due by January 15 Commercial Residential September October November December Totals by Energy &Environment Commission Proposal of 7 -21 -11 Work Session Item No. III. B. 1. Objective: All Edina Parks will have a recycling bins paired with each solid waste bins. At least 5 parks will be added each year with half the funding supplied by the City and halfthrough donations. To meet this objective benchmark, the Park & Recreation Department will provide an annual inventory in January of each year of.the number (by park) of all trash bins, as well as recycling bins in the Edina Park System... Recycling bins like those donated b Dow Chemical are $6 y g. y OO.for each 60 gal bin. Bins must be suitable,for outdoor use such that they withstand the elements, damage and /or theft. Recycling bins will be added using the following guidelines: 1. Replacing Trash Bins —Some trash cans are replaced each year, due to theft or damage. Each trash can that needs to be replaced will be replaced with a recycling bin instead, and placed next to a remaining trash can. There is no additional cost in doing this. It results in no extra work on the part of park maintenance because they are empting the same number of bins: Maintenance is still taking the same volume out of each park, but they will be taking out at least half of it as recycling. 2. The Park and Rec. Dept - Should budget for at least 10 new recycling bins each year beyond those that are in replacement of damaged or stolen trash bins. For every recycling bin paired with a park a trash bin, one trash bin can be removed provided the distances between pairs of trash /recycling bins does not become too great. If the distance becomes too great such that it is inadvisable to remove a trash bin, then the bins can be emptied less often given that the bin capacity has increased due to the additional recycling bins. 3. Sponsorship by Local Organizations - Solicit these to donate recycling bins with sponsorship acknowledgment.: By Park and Rec. policy, a donor's name can be placed on a donated:item, but advertising cannot be placed there. In other words, the recycling bin could say "Donated by Joe's", but not "Eat at Joe's." The organization's logo would be permissible as on the Dow recycling bins at Lewis and Pamela Park. Park and Rec policy states. that a donor must donate at least $5,000 before their name can be placed on an item. This policy should be amended to make an exception for recycling bins given that Dow had their name on each recycling bin despite the $600 cost of each. Sponsorship acknowledgment is a marvelous incentive for donations. 4. Grants — We should continue to search for these. Usually the groups that give grants for recycling bins, or local organizations such as those above in #3.who would donate them, will want their name and /or logo on them like Dow has done. From: Vince Cockriel Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 8:29 AM To: John Keprios Cc: Solvei Wilmot; Bob Prestrud Subject: Recycling Containers John, As you know, we have been monitoring the contents of the new recycling containers on a regular basis since the seasonal help arrived in mid- June. This monitoring consisted of emptying the containers and seeing what the contents consisted of. The start date of the monitoring was June 21St. That date was chosen for two reasons. The first reason being the fact that the containers were new to the two test parks and we wanted to give the park users a chance to get used to them before we monitored them. The second reason was that we are fully staffed by mid -June. The results of the monitoring are as follows: Lewis Park - Checked 4_� times from June 21St to August 29th. Contaminated 34 times. Clean 14 Niles. Pamela Park - Checked ® times from June 2V to August 29th. Contaminated 31 times. Clean 17 times. The cumulative times the containers were emptied is R. The number of times they were contaminated is 65. Over 60% of the time the containers are contaminated. The size, shape, color, signage or location within the parks doesn't seem to make any difference in the recycling compliance. The contaminated containers were simply dumped into the dumpsters with the rest of the garbage. The clean containers were put into the recycling dumpsters. Monitoring the recycling containers is labor intensive. Adding and emptying recycling containers that end up being garbage containers is also labor intensive. If purchased with City of Edina funds, the recycling containers that we are currently using are 6 to 8 times more expensive than the garbage containers that we are currently using. Hopefully this information will be helpful as we go forward. VC 8.3.11 Work Session Item No. V. A. PURPOSE: The Air Quality Working Group of the Edina Energy and Environment Commission makes the following recommendations for amendments to Edina City Code 850 for the purpose of reducing toxic emissions, improving air quality, promoting walking and biking, and decreasing car dependence. The amendments also enable Edina to comply with GreenStep Cities reporting requirements. , i Proposed Edina City Ordinance - Amendments for Section 850 - General Requirements Applicable to all Districts Except as Otherwise Stated. Subdivision 14 Drive- Through Facility Standards. A. Number of Stacking Spaces in Addition to the Vehicle(s) Being Served 1. Financial institutions: 3 stacking spaces per bay 2. Car wash: 25 stacking spaces per bay 3. Accessory car wash: 2 stacking spaces per bay IA- A � 'm' �-v�Rr'rn- - oi>•.ccTCC..cv 7cvGkiTg .apiicc-PcrT✓cr�. A All other uses: 4 stacking spaces per bay B. Location of Stacking Space. 1. No stacking space shall encroach into. any drive aisle necessary for the circulation of vehicles. 2. All stacking spaces shall provide the same setbacks as are required by this Section for parking spaces. 3. In the case of uses described in subparagraph 4. of paragraph A. of Subd. 14 above, if the drive - through bay is equipped with a facility for placing an order which is separated from the location at which the product or merchandise is received by the customer,.not less than three of the required stacking spaces shall be provided at the ordering point. C. Minimum Size of Stacking Space. The minimum size of each stacking space shall be nine feet wide by 18 feet deep. D. Accessory Canopies and Mechanical Equipment. All canopies and equipment appurtenant to a drive - through facility shall provide the same setbacks as are.required for principal buildings. E. Facilities Accessory to Restaurants. Drive - through facilities accessory to restaurants shall be limited to two service windows and two audio systems and menu boards. WEI 1 8.3.11 'Work Session Item No. V. A. F.q Menu board and audio system shall not be located on a side of a building that faces single - family residential homes o.r,property zoned single= family residential. G. Setback Requirement. Drive- through facilities must be located at least 300 feet from single - family residential homes or property zoned single- family residential. H. Non - Idling Signs. Non - Idling signs must be posted in view of patrons in all drive- through lanes. (__Traffic & Circulation. Drive - through facilities shall be subject to Subdivision 6 of Section 850.08 of the City Code. J. Traffic Impact Study. A traffic impact study assessing the following must be prepared: 1. Current traffic conditions of areas within 1000 feet of the proposed location that investigate average and peak volume, speed, sight lines, and accident information. 2. Averape annual traffic growth. 3. Proiected impacts of development, including peak and daily traffic increases and needed traffic control measures. 4. The need for future plans to mitigate traffic increases and safety threats through design so that the level of service prior to development is the minimum standard for post - development traffic. 5. Any other information the Engineer requires to determine if the orderly and safe movement of traffic is maintained 2 8.3.11 Work Session Item No. V. A. K. Air Quality Standard. Drive- throughs must be closed if the Air Quality Index exceeds a rating of 101, as determined by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency. 850.16 Planned Commercial District (PCD). Subd. 2 Principal Uses in PCD -1. Restaurants, but excluding "drive ins" and drive through facilities, `Subd. 7 Accessory Uses in PCD -1. Off - street parking facilities. Buildings for the storage of merchandise to be retailed by the related principal use. Not more than two amusement devices. Drive through facilities, except those accessory to financial institutions. Produce stands pursuant to a permit issued by the Manager I 9 Section 850 -1.07 Subd. 14 Drive Through Facility Standards History On September 1, 2009 Edina City Council approved an amendment to the City's zoning ordinance that allowed restaurants to sell coffee, . non- alcoholic beverages, pastries and donuts via drive- through windows in PCD -1 zoning districts. This action expanded drive- through use significantly as the PCD -1 zoning district only permitted financial institutions, car washes and pharmacies to use drive - through Windows for sales and services. The amendment change was driven by a specific development plan for 4420 Valley View Road, the former Clancy's Drug store site. Proposed by the owners of Prima Restaurantllj and Bull Run Coffee, the amendment change was never actually utilized; the proponents failed to occupy theproperty. The original motivation for the amendment change does not exist. Additionally there are currently no businesses that are actively pursuing this marketing option in any of the City's PCD4 zones. C While all of the PCD -1 zones were influenced by this amendment change; only residents in the PCD -1 zone near Valley View and Wooddale were notified about the"expansion of marketing options for drive - through windows. Residents in the other PCD 71 zones were not notified and did not have the opportunity to weigh in on the legislation. There are four other PCD -1 zones at the following sites: the intersection of HWY100 and Eden Avenue; area near Amundson Avenue and Cahill Road; Londonderry and Lincoln Drive, the 44th'and France area, .and the 54th and France area. Of the 11 cities surveyed by city staff in 2009, six cities (Apple Valley, Lakeville, Richfield, Plymouth, Wayzata, Falcon Heights) did not allow drive- through windows in neighborhood commercial.districts. Of the 11, five had deeper setbacks from residential'lots then Edina's 20 ft, setback, including Wayzata at 50 ft from the building, St. Louis Parkk and Minnetonka at 100 ft, Richfield at 150 feet and Plymouth at 300 ft. Issues Expanding the products that business establishments can market through drive - through windows encourages drive - through construction. This amendment, while motivated by one particular development proposal applies, a proposal that never came to fruition, introduces potential for significant change in four other Edina neighborhoods. Encouraging drive - through establishments is problematic for the following reasons: • Increased engine idling which compromises air quality • Greater automobile traffic and congestion • Reduced incentives for pedestrian and bike traffic • Legislation at odds with GreenStep Cities At the time of this amendment Prima Restaurant existed in Minneapolis on Lyndale Avenue. The owners of this establishment wanted to open up another restaurant on the Clancy's site. In initial documents and testimony owners called this restaurant "Prima" as well. Later they referenced it as "Primi." Proposed Actions In addition to eliminating sales of beverages and food from the ordinance, the EEC proposes the following changes: a. Increasing the setback from residential areas to 300 feet b. Posting of, non - idling signs in the setback zone c. Requiring 'a traffic study prior to approval d. Requiring drive- through windows to close if the Air. Quality Index exceed sa rating of 101, as determined by the Minnesota Pollution ControlAgency. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency advocates no engine idling,— see link: http: / /www.pca.state.mn.us /index.php /view- document.html ?gid =8906 Work Session Item No. V. B. Air Quality Working Group (AQWG) Proposal for No Vehicle Idling Signs in Municipal Parks and Other Public Spaces Summary: As part of the Air Quality Working Group's efforts to improve air quality, the AQWG is promoting a public awareness campaign to decrease vehicle idling by posting signage at specific municipal locations. Problem: Vehicle idling frequently occurs at municipal venues, particularly public parks. During the winter months, people waiting for athletes often allow engines to idle in order to keep their vehicles warm. During the summer months they idle their engines to keep cars cool. At other times, temperature may not be a factor; vehicle idling can be an unnecessary habit. At parks, vehicle idling is particularly problematic as it happens in lots that are frequently located adjacent to athletic fields, resulting in compromised air for the athletes as well as spectators. Engine idling happens at other municipal venues as well, including the Edina Art Center and the Edina Senior Center. Suggested Locations: Below is a listing of municipal venues and the number of signs the AQWG would like to have posted. Given limited resources, it may not be feasible to post the suggested number of signs in all of these locales. It may make sense to start this effort by posting no idling signs on signposts that will be put in to indicate which athletic fields in Edina are chemically free fields. Parks that have an asterisk next to them are the ones that will have this chemically free signage. 2 —Alden Park* 2- Arden Park* 3- Arneson Acres 6- Braemar Park 3 — Bredeson Park 1— Bristol Park 1- Browndale Park 2- Birchcrest Park* 4- Centennial Lakes 1— Chowen Park* 2 — Cornelia School Park* 3- Countryside Park 1- Creek Valley School Park* 5 — Edinborough Park 2 — Fox Meadow Park 2 — Frank Tupa Park— historical site* 4 — Fred Richards Golf Course 4— Garden Park (including Addition) 1— Grandview Square 3 — Heights Park* 4- Highlands Park 2 — Kojetin Park* 1- Krahl Hill 2 — Lincoln Drive Floodplain 1— McGuire Park 1— Melody Lake Park 2 — Normandale Park 4— Pamela Park 5 — Rosaland Park 1— Sherwood Park* 1— St. John's Park* 3 — Strachauer Park* 3 — T. Lea Todd Park* 2— Tingdale Park* 1— Utley Park 4 —Van Valkenburg Park 3 —Walnut Ridge Park* 3 —Webber Field Park 1— Williams Park— historical site* 2 — Wooddale Park 2 — York Park* 1— Yorktown Park 1 —Edina Art Center* 3 - Edina City Hall 1— Public Works building 2 — Lake Edina Park 4 — Senior Center 3- Lewis Park Total number of signs —115 Work Session Item No. V. B. NOTE: Parks with an asterisk ( *) are spaces designated as places where organic treatment can be used to control weeds. This designation was made by the EEC Turf Management Task Force. Cost: Cost for 125 signs from Safety Signs 1,718.75 (plus shipping and handling 145.30) total 1864.05 Cost for 125 from Road Traffic Signs 1868.75 (plus shipping and handling 181.78) total 2050.53 Note: this figure does not include installation or the cost of nuts and bolts as well as 6' high fence posts. Note: to date the AQWG has not discussed the possibility of in -house signage design. This possibility was recently brought to our attention. If possible it could result in cheaper signs as well as signage that is specific to our community. Options: Below are examples of signage. As the City of Edina does not have a policy on engine idling, signage needs to be encouraging not demanding. A "Please turn of your engine" message rather than a "Engine idling prohibited" Safety Signs Company httl2:f /www.safetysigg.com /search.php ?keywords =no +idling Turn Off Your Engine BREATHE BETTER SAVE MONEY N.C. Oivis:on of Ali Quality www.ncelr.org Work Session Item No. V. C Resolution: Conversion of the Three Wood Burning Centrum Fire Places to Gas Date: 9 -05 -11 Action Requested: Due to the hazards of wood smoke to human health, to the global environment, and to our urban forest, the Aug. 25, 2011 meeting of the Air and Water Quality Working Group recommends to the Edina Energy and Environment Commission that Edina's three wood burning Centrum fire places be converted to gas. Information Background: Wood smoke: 1. Is a major source of carbon dioxide and black carbon soot in the atmosphere. 2. is hazardous to human health: 3. Contributes to the spread of insect -borne tree disease, such as emerald ash borer and Dutch elm disease. Gas inserts for fireplaces and fire rings are safer and more environmentally sound then burning wood. Such inserts also reduce the number of trees that must be destroyed for fuel; trees help absorb carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas. The head of the United Nations Environment Program recommends measures to slash non- carbon dioxide greenhouse gas pollutants, including black carbon, "because they make up some 50 percent of toxic atmospheric emissions ". He stressed that "The world must deploy all available means to reduce this pollution and that no substance contributing to this pollution should be overlooked." 1 Wood smoke emits fine particulates that contain many of the same deadly toxins that are in tobacco smoke and vehicle exhaust. They are comprised of formaldehyde', benzene, toluene 3, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), dioxins4 and other noxious and persistent organic compounds and greenhouse pollutants that buildup in our lungs, crops and water supply. Wood smoke is more concentrated than tobacco smoke, travels farther and remains chemically active in the body for up to 40 hours longer -.. Everyone is at risk from wood -smoke exposure. But children of all ages6, unborn children, the elderly, and anyone with asthma, allergies, or heart disease are in the highest -risk categories. The US Center for Disease Control states that wood smoke is a trigger for asthma attacks. Wood smoke is also implicated in cancers, reproductive birth defects and in sudden infant death syndrome.' A study found that people who burn wood or other "biofuels" for heat or cooking may have.a heightened risk of emphysema and related lung conditions. Among non - smokers, exposure to biomass 1 See 4 Sept. 2009 UN News Service at http: / /www.un.org/apps/ news /story.asp ?NewslD = 31952 &Cr= unep &Crl). ' � See http:// www. hc- sc. gc. ca/ hl- vs /iyh- vsv /environ/formaidehyde- eng.php ; http://www.cpsc.gov/cpscpub/pubs/725.pdf 3 See http: / /www.fs. fed. us /t -d/ pubs / htmlpubs /htm04232327 /page0l.htm; http: / /www.epa.gov /teach /chem_summ /BENZ_summary.pdf 4 See "The Health Effects of Wood Smoke ", iviviv. ehhi. orgl ivoodsmoke /health_effects.shtml. 5 See iviviv.burningissues.org. 6 See Science Daily (Nov. 7, 2009) "Air Pollution Increases Infants' Risk Of Bronchiolitis" http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/11/091106084243.htm. 7 See "Important asthma triggers," "You can control your asthma ", CDC, USA.gov, updated April 27, 2009. Work Session Item No. V. C smoke was linked to a 2.5 -fold increase in the risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Smokers exposed to biomass smoke, meanwhile, had a more than four -fold greater risk of COPD than non - smokers who did not burn biomass fuels at home. s The Center for Biological Diversity petitioned the Environmental Protection Agency to set limits on black carbon, a /k /a "soot." Generated from the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels and biomass, black carbon is a solid particle that warms the atmosphere because its dark color absorbs heat -- both when it accumulates in the air, raising the air's temperature, and when it lands on snow and ice, accelerating melting. Black carbon also has profound effects on public health, causing hundreds of thousands of premature deaths each year.9 The movement of firewood contributes to the spread of tree pathogens. Emerald ash borer will soon be killing trees in Edina. According to a Department of Natural Resources (DNR) document, "America's neighborhoods are under attack. The emerald ash borer lives in firewood. Move firewood and you spread the destruction. "10 Minnesota's antismoking ordinance allows people to go to bars and restaurants and avoid smoke, because tobacco smoke is a proven killer. Edina's City ordinance prohibits smoking in City parks and facilities. Yet residents have no choice but to breathe wood smoke in the Centrum. The Edina Energy and Environment Commission is respectfully requested to ask the Edina City Council to set an example by reducing the City of Edina's wood burning by converting the three wood burning fireplaces in the Centrum to gas. Tom Shirley has estimated that the cost of converting the 3 Centrum fireplaces to gas is approximately $5,000. Such a conversion would save on the cost of wood as well as cleaning the fireplaces in addition to improving air quality. Air and Water Quality Working Group Of the Edina Energy and Environment Commission ° See New York (Reuters Health) 2 -25 -2010, http: //bumingissues.org/ forum /phpBB2 /viewtopic.php ?F11 &t =3497. 9 See Los Angeles Times, February 22, 2010, http:// www.biologicaldiversity.org /news /center /articles /2010 /los- angeles- times- 02- 22- 2010.htm I. 10 See Michigan State University Extension Bulletin E -2940, "Promise not to move firewood." March 2007. Work Session Item VI. A. Coal Tar Based Ordinance Amendment City Of Edina 1 1 Objective The objective of this ordinance amendment is to ban the use of coal tar -based sealants within the City of Edina in an effort to safeguard water bodies, natural resources that contribute significant value to the community. Rationale Coal tar -based sealants contain a type of organic chemical compound labeled Polycystic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), seven of which have been identified as probable human carcinogens. Although commonly applied to driveways and parking lots, scientific studies have demonstrated negative health and environmental effects when PAHs are released into the environment and become part of stormwater runoff. Additional problems are then faced by local governments, charged with managing, dredging, and disposing of stormwater pond sediment. An alternative is readily available. Asphalt -based sealants contain 1 /650 the amount of PAHs as do coal tar -based sealants. A widely recognized study focused on the differing levels of PAHs released into the environment from different sealants. The United States Geological Survey worked with the City of Austin, TX in evaluating the environmental and health impacts of driveways and parking lots treated three different ways: without sealants, those sealed with asphalt -based products, and those covered with coal tar -based sealants. As friction from tires causes particles to break free from driveways and parking lots, they are carried into the stormwater system. Particles from coal tar -based sealants accounted for half of PAH levels in the 40 urban lakes included in the study, the largest contributor to PAH concentrations. An increase in PAH levels over the last 50 years is attributable to the use of coal tar -based sealants. Additional USGS reports show negative effects of PAHS include dust from coal tar -based sealed driveways that entered homes and accounted for PAH levels that averaged 530 times higher than homes near driveways sealed with other products. Toxic effects on aquatic life, birds, and mammals were also documented. Practice The 2009 Minnesota Legislature enacted legislation, House File 1231, that restricts state agencies from buying undiluted coal tar -based sealant and instructs the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) to investigate the environmental effects of the sealant and propose management strategies. MS4 Permittees are required to meet legislated guidelines in the June 2011 process of municipal stormwater permitting. The MPCA will be awarding grants for treating contaminated sediment to communities that have an ordinance banning coal tar -based sealants in place. As of August 8, 2011, at least ten Minnesota communities have banned the use of coal tar -based sealants: • Buffalo (Undiluted Language) 1 1 EEC -WQWG — L Eaton Work Session Item VI. A. Coal Tar Based Ordinance Amendment City Of Edina 1 2 • Centerville • Circle Pines • Golden Valley (Recommendation, not a ban ?) • Little Canada • Maplewood (Ban) • New Hope (Undiluted Language) • Prior Lake (Ban) • Roseville • Vadnais Heights • White Bear Lake (Ban) The City of Edina does not use coal tar products in its road construction or road maintenance programs. The City has found comparable products for its projects without using a substance that causes harmful environmental effects. Though coal tar products are not the sole source of PAHs, but eliminating its use on residential and commercial properties throughout Edina, will reduce a known water pollutant source. The dust from coal tar products can run off during rain events, which eventually finds its particles and residue deposited into local ponds and streams and eventually making its way to the rivers. It can also be moved throughout a community via tire treads, wind, and foot traffic. As part of the most recent M54 Permits requirements, all Cities are prohibited from using these products. It only makes sense to ban the use of the product throughout the City as a means of being in "complete" compliance in the true spirit of the permit. Alternate products are available throughout the retail and wholesale markets especially as more communities are moving to ban coal tar products. The Home Depot and Lowes have removed all coal -tar sealants from its inventory, acknowledging the increasing environmental concerns. Edina's passage of banning coal tar products would place Edina amongst leading Cities in Minnesota who have taken this progressive action. Common concerns related to passing the ordinance banning coal tar -based sealants include the possible negative impacts on businesses, the inability to enforce the ban, and industry information that challenges the actual level of contribution of PAHs by coal tar -based sealants. In addition to questioning the source of PAHs in sediment, coal tar -based industry information reports that a relative benefit is achieved through using coal tar -based sealants over asphalt -based sealants due to the former having an expected lifespan of 30 years, double the lifespan of asphalt -based sealers. The industry position is detailed in their website, http : / /www.pavementcouncil.ore /. Other bans enacted include a state -wide ban in Washington, Dane County, WI, Austin, TX, and Washington, D.C. Comparable Communities' Ordinances and Staff Reports 2 1 EEC -WQWG — L Eaton Work Session Item VI. A. Coal Tar Based Ordinance Amendment,City Of Edina 13 http://www;ci.buffalo;mn.6s/admin/citycode/1057.htm References City of Austin, 2005, PAHs in Austin, Texas; sediments and coal -tar based pavement sealants: Watershed Protection Department, 55 p., accessed September 14, 2010, at http://www.ci.austin.tx.uslwatershedldownloodslcooltar.drdft pah. study.pdf: Scoggins, M., McClintock, N., Gosselink, L., and Bryer, P., 2007, Occurrence of polycyclic aromatic , hydrocarbons below coal- tar - sealed parking lots and effects on stream benthic.macroinvertebrate communities: Journal of the North American Benthological Society, v. 26, no. 4,.p: 694 -707. Van Metre, P.C., and Mahler, :B.J., 2010, Contribution of PAHs'from coal -tar pavement sealcoat and other sources to 40 U.S. lakes: Science of the Total Environment, v. 409, p. 334 -344. Van Metre, P.C., Mahler, B.J., Scoggins, M., and Hamilton, P.A.; 2006. Parking Lot Sealcoat: A Major Source of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Urban.and Suburban Environments. A'USGS report prepared in cooperation with the City of Austin, Texas. . Provides an overview of why PAHs are harmful to the environment and to the general public health. Article.is attached, "Coal- Tar -Based Pavement Sealcoat, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), and Environmental Health." Key points from the article: Dust from pavement with coal- tar -based sealcoat has greatly elevated PAH concentrations compared to dust from unsealed pavement. • Coal- tar -based sealcoat is the largest source of PAH contamination to 40 urban lakes studied, accounting for one -half of all PAH inputs. . • Coal- tar -based sealcoat use. is the primary cause of upward trends in PAHs, since the 1960s, in urban lake sediment: • Residences adjacent to parking lots with coal- tar - based sealcoat have PAH concentrations in house dust that are 25 times higher than-those in house .dust in residences adjacent to parking lots without. coal -tar- based sealcoat. • PAHs move from a seal- coated surface into our environment by many mechanisms: storm runoff, adhesion to tires, wind, foot traffic, and volatilization. 3 1 EEC -WCIWG — L Eaton Work Session Item VI. A. Proposed Ordinance ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE REGULATING THE USE OF COAL TAR -BASED SEALER PRODUCTS WITHIN THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA SECTION 1. PURPOSE. The City of Edina understands that lakes, rivers, streams and other bodies of water are natural assets which enhance the environmental, recreational, cultural and economic resources and contribute to the general health and welfare of the community. The use of sealers on asphalt driveways is a common practice. However, scientific studies on the use of driveway sealers have demonstrated a relationship between stormwater runoff and certain health and environmental concerns. The purpose of this ordinance is to regulate the use of sealer products within the City of Edina, in order to protect, restore, and preserve the quality of its waters. SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS. Except as may otherwise be provided or clearly implied by context, all terms shall) be given their commonly accepted definitions. For the purpose of this ordinance, the following definitions shall apply unless the context clear indicates or requires a different meaning: ASPHALT -BASED SEALER. A petroleum -based sealer material that is commonly used on driveways, parking lots, and other surfaces and which does not contain coal tar.`; COAL TAR. A byproduct of the process used to refine coal. COAL TAR -BASED SEALER. A sealer material containing coal tar and is for use on an asphalt or concrete surface, including a driveway or parking area. CITY. The City of Edina ., r MPCA. The Mi6heiota Pollution Control Agency. PAHs. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. A group of organic chemicals formed during the incomplete burning of coal, oil, gas, or other organic substances. Presentyin coal tar'and believed harmful to humans, fish, and other aquatic life. SECTION 3. PROHIBITIONS.` Use of Coal Tar -Based Sealer Prohibited.. A. No person shall apply any coal tar -based sealer to any driveway, parking lot, or other surface within the City of Edina. B. No person shall contract with any commercial sealer product applicator, residential or commercial developer, or any other person for the application of any coal tar -based sealer to any driveway, parking lot, or other surface within the City.. . C. No commercial sealer product applicator, residential or commercial developer, or other similar individual or organization shall direct any employee, independent contractor, volunteer, or other person to apply any coal tar -based sealer to any driveway, parking lot, or other surface within the City. A person who own property on which a coal tar - based sealer is used is presumed to have used a coal tar -based sealer in violation of this section. SECTION S. ASPHALT -BASED SEALCOAT PRODUCTS. Work Session Item VI. A. Proposed Ordinance The provisions of this ordinance shall only apply to use of coal tar -based sealer in the City and shall not affect the use of asphalt -based sealer products within the, City. SECTION 6. PENALTY. Any person convicted of violating any provision. of this ordinance is guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be punished by a fine not to exceed one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) or imprisonment for not more than ninety (90) days, or both, plus the costs of prosecution in either case. SECTION 7. SEVERABILITY. ��4ar,. If any provision of this ordinance is found to be invalid for any reason by a court of competent jurisdiction, the validity of r! 1 a� the remaining provisions shall not be affected. +Irjlj3l'i�NI I,� Jill ��;�n !j�i�tTjNs�+'�fl o I 1 tt r SECTION 8. EFFECTIVE DATE. r.,, '�iril This ordinance becomes effective on the date of its publication, or upon the publicatiii!w on,'of a summary of the ordinance Bbl ",!P41� � +I+ Il�iu . as provided by Minn. Stat. § 412.191, subd,� 4, as it maybe amended from time to time; which meets the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 331A.01, subd. 10, as it may be amended fromAime to time " +1, First Reading +;''�'If „ +ufi+1+;!Jfyyl gal fill jltlim !t nd +2� i �,la i . Second Reading: ilmlhF inf*ilj�nat, iir n +T!�trfi {� i[ III ua d�ihltlinli l'I X11 Published: �'JJI u!�hlM1i ,;�fl!i�rG lfm!- !Pill , Attest C411V0I,0GY c®U1VCII, VVWW.PAVENM14TC0UNCI1L.0RG August 11, 2011 City of Edina, Minnesota Energy and Environment Commission 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 via email: edinamail(a-ci.edina.mn.us 0"OC Subject: Proposed Ordinance to Ban the Use of Refined Tar -Based Sealers Within the City of Edina, Minnesota Dear Commissioners, I write to you today as the Executive Director of the Pavement Coatings Technology Council (PCTC) concerning the subject proposed ordinance. Members of PCTC manufacture and supply pavement coating materials throughout North America, including refined tar -based pavement sealers (often colloquially referred to as "coal tar -based sealers "). PCTC members operate two facilities that manufacture refined tar -based sealers in the Twin Cities, Minnesota, area. These facilities and others in nearby locations supply pavement coating materials to dozens of contractors in Minnesota and surrounding states. Without exception, the Minnesota manufacturers and contractors are small, responsible businesses that provide good value to their customers and contribute to the economic well being of their local communities. Bans such as that under consideration by the Edina Energy and Environment Commission have been enacted in several Minnesota communities and a few other locations are unwarranted, based on faulty and incomplete science. These bans are only harmful - adverse impacts on local businesses, loss of jobs and loss of tax revenues - without any discernable environmental or public health benefit. Banning a product that has been safely used for more than six decades, that provides value to its users, and that provides gainful employment for thousands is a serious matter that 2308 Mount.Vernon Avenue, Suite 134 Phone: +1 (703) 299 -8470 Alexandria Virginia 22301 Fax: +1(703) 842 -8850 alehuray @povementcouncil.org City of Edina, Minnesota Page 2 Energy and Environment Commission requires careful evaluation of the facts and evidence that the benefits of the ban justify the costs. Those advocating that refined tar -based sealer be banned say — without any evidence - that sealers are a threat to the environment and public health. Ban advocates are unable to identify any harm actually caused by sealers in the real world. Rather, advocates engage in misrepresenting possible hazards as actual risks. Curiously, those advocating product bans in Minnesota and elsewhere fail to mention that coal tar has medicinal uses, approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in the treatment of skin ailments such as eczema, psoriasis and dandruff. Advocates of banning sealers also fail to mention that FDA recognizes the single largest source of human exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) — found in coal tar, wood smoke, decaying organic matter (such as compost and wetland sediments), grilled vegetables, and all coal and petroleum products — is food. . Advocates also fail to mention that PAHs are virtually insoluble in water, and pose no threat to sources of drinking water. Indeed, PAHs are so rarely detected in water that the US Environmental Protection Agency has declined to establish standards. If standards were to be established, water treatment facilities would be required to analyze their water for PAHs, needlessly adding to operational expenses. The finding that several PAHs are possible human carcinogens applies to inhaled PAHs, such as in industrial -age furnaces and cigarette smoke. Human carcinogenicity has not been identified for oral exposure to PAHs, such as exposure in cooked food, or to skin exposure, such as application of medicinal creams All this discussion of possible health effects associated with PAHs obscures an important fact: PCTC members are not aware of any adverse health effects among people exposed every day for decades to refined tar -based sealers. The majority of PCTC members are family -owned businesses, with two, three and even four generations of families working for most of their lives with sealers. If adverse health effects were associated with exposure to refined tar -based sealers, it would be evident in these families. In trying to find the right balance between economic considerations and environmental protection, policy makers often find it frustrating when scientists disagree about environmental impacts. In the case of refined tar -based pavement sealers, much misinformation has been disseminated — much of it, unfortunately, by governments at all levels. Last week, shortly after becoming aware of Edina's Energy and Environment Commission plan to consider a proposal to ban the use of the sealers in Edina, PCTC was contacted by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). MPCA informed PCTC that it would like to work with the sealer industry to make sure accurate and scientifically sound information about the product is promulgated in 404000", WWW.PAVINIE TTCOUNCIL.ORG City of Edina, Minnesota Energy and Environment Commission Page 3 Minnesota. As a preliminary step, MPCA is proposing a meeting with MPCA's Commissioner to be scheduled after MPCA has provided the information the Agency has been relying on to PCTC for evaluation. Members of the PCTC would be more than happy to provide the City of Edina with information about refined tar -based sealers. That said, the Energy and Environment Commission may wish to table its deliberations pending the outcome of MPCA's further consideration of the issue. In the interim, please find attached an abstract of a study focused on risk management aspects of the sealer issue, accepted for presentation at the 2011 annual meeting of the Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC) later this year. Thank you for your attention. Please don't hesitate to contact me for more information. Yours truly, Anne P. LeHuray P 04Co", W W W.PAVIMIHNUCOUNCIL.ORG Final Presentation Type: Platform Preferred Track: Ecological Risk Assessment Session: PAH Exposure and Implications Regarding Human and Ecological Risks Abstract Title: Managing Risks: Will banning pavement sealers have the desired effect? Authors Kirk O'Reilly, Jaana Pietari — Exponent, Bellevue, WA Paul Boehm — Exponent, Maynard, MA Abstract: The USGS and others have raised the concern that refined tar pavement sealers are a significant source.of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in urban sediments. The researchers involved have been actively advocating product bans at the federal, state, and local level. While outlawing the use of an established product is one means of managing risks, it should be implemented only if it will have the desired effect. The USGS hypothesis is based in part on the similarity in PAH profiles between sealers and sediments. Our recent work has demonstrated that this profile is not unique, but common to a range of environmental particles that become entrained in sediments. Inconsistencies in the results of different forensic methods applied to the.data used by the USGS further . weaken their hypothesis. This presentation focuses on an evaluation of three urban water bodies, from the west coast, midwest, and east coast. Inclusion of these data in USGS publications has led to actual or proposed product bans. In each case, the water bodies are in air sheds that are part of atmospheric source studies. Forensic comparison of the PAH chemistry of the sediments, regional depositional particles, and. sealers indicates that the sealers are not a controlling factor. The results suggest,that implementing a sealer ban will not,result in a change in local sediment chemistry. The implication of these findings in setting -- policies for risk management will also be discussed. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North I St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 -4194 1 651 - 296-6300 800- 657 -3864 1 651- 282 -5332 TTY I www.pcastate.mn.us I Equal Opportunity Employer September 2, 2011 Ms. Dianne Plunkett Latham Chair, Edina Energy & Environment Commission 7013 Comanche Court Edina MN 55439 -1004 Dear Dianne: This letter is responding to the questions you asked in our phone conversation on Wednesday. Many of your questions are related to the letter you received from the Executive Director of the Pavement Coatings Technology Council (PCTC) dated August 11, 2011. Other questions were related to ordinances already passed in Minnesota restricting the use and sale of coal tar -based sealants. The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) has been trying to keep track of ordinances passed in Minnesota, but the level of effort to keep an up -to -date list is significant. Resources to stay on top of maintaining this list are stretched thin and keeping the list current cannot be justified with limited resources. The spreadsheet I sent you via e-mail on Wednesday is the most up -to -date list we have, but it is probably not a complete list. It can provide a starting point if you intend to contact other communities who have considered their own ordinances. You also asked about language in the model ordinance available on the LMC and MPCA websites with the specific question about why the MPCA included the term "undiluted ", but then did not define or provide guidance about what level of dilution would be sufficient for safety. It was not the MPCA's choice to include the term "undiluted ". It is my understanding that the State of Minnesota does not have guidance as to what is an acceptable level of dilution for public safety. The "undiluted" term originated from legislative action in 2009, and I believe it was included in the model ordinance with a legal justification to mirror the language of the statute authority that created the grant program. A simple or brief response to the PCTC letter is difficult since the claims are many and include environmental, public health, science, and commerce related topics. I understand the letter to be primarily focused on two main points. One is related to how the PCTC believes coal tar -based sealant restrictions will hurt small business owners in Minnesota, and the other is that they do not view their product as being detrimental to environmental or public health, or being a major source of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) to lakes and ponds. The MPCA does not question the value or responsibility business owners have in providing services and products to their customers. The PCTC letter expresses concerns about the economic well being of local communities and the MPCA shares these concerns, but not with the focus described in the PCTC's letter. The PCTC suggests coal tar -based sealant restrictions in Minnesota can only have harmful, adverse impacts on local businesses which will lead to loss of jobs and loss of tax revenues without any discernable environmental or public health benefit. The MPCA believes these claims are grossly exaggerated, and may not accurately reflect their own industry in Minnesota. Dianne Plunkett Latham Page 2 September 2, 2011 MPCA research shows that coal tar -based sealants are (for the most part) already off the shelves with Minnesota retailers, including Ace Hardware, Do It Best, Lowe's, Menards, The Home Depot, and True Value. Coal tar -based sealants are still in commerce with a minority of retailers and commercial applicators that operate outside of metro -area municipalities that have enacted bans. It is our understanding that a switch to an alternative product (such as asphalt -based sealers which have much lower concentrations of PAHs) does not require retooling existing processes, require new or different equipment, or new or additional training for staff. For example, a March 15, 2011 newspaper article for the Quad Community Press includes a Minnesota specific business perspective from Jet Black, a respected business leader for this industry: http: / /www.presspubs.com /articles /2011 /03/15 /quad community press /news /doc4d7f9bdebe0c9798 765286.txt. Nick Kelso, Chief Executive Officer of Jet - Black, commented: "There are pros and cons to both," Kelso said. "We don't think (the bans) will affect business in the long- term." The PCTC letter suggests the MPCA has drawn conclusions without any evidence, and /or based on faulty and incomplete science. Furthermore, the PCTC letter also suggests that the MPCA has misrepresented possible hazards as actual risks. The MPCA stands behind the science and research conducted by the MPCA Environmental Analysis and Outcomes Division, and the MPCA has faith in the work of the research scientists who have subjected their findings to peer review; yielding confidence in the methods and conclusions. Research by the United States Geological Survey (USGS), City of Austin, TX, University of New Hampshire Stormwater Center, and the MPCA provides a compelling weight -of- evidence that coal tar -based sealcoat products are an important source of PAHs to our environment at concentrations that pose a potential risk to ecological communities and humans. MPCA research conducted on 15 metro area stormwater ponds was consistent with the findings of a national USGS (peer- reviewed) study of 40 lakes. Last spring the MPCA used environmental forensic techniques to determine sources of PAHs to metro area stormwater pond sediments, as shown in this pie chart. Sources of PAHs in Metro Stormwater Pond Sediments 2.49/o ■ Coal Tar -Based Sealant Oil Based Sources Tunnel Air (vehicle emissions) Other Combustion Sources Natural Sources Dianne Plunkett Latham Page 2 September 2, 2011 Quantitative techniques used to fingerprint (profile) and assign sources of PAHs utilized a United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) contaminant mass balance model that was determined to be the most rigorous and effective technique for assigning sources of PAHs. Confidence in the conclusions and the techniques are associated with published source profiles (fingerprints) for 12 PAH compounds. These quantitative techniques also yielded a margin of uncertainty for each source. The EPA model shows that coal tar -based sealants and air emissions (like vehicle exhaust, such as measured in a highway tunnel) are the most prevalent sources of PAHs in metro stormwater pond sediments in the Twin Cities. The PCTC letter implies misrepresentation of possible hazards as actual risks by "failing to mention that PAHs are virtually insoluble in water." This has not been a point of disagreement and it is unclear to me why the PCTC would imply that this topic has been misrepresented. PAH compounds of concern are not found dissolved in water, but instead are bound tightly to sediment or soil particles. The MPCA has not focused on the solubility in water because it is a mute point. Our focus remains on the concentration of PAHs in sediment since this is where the PAH compounds of concern concentrate. Food derived sources of PAHs and medicinal uses of coal tar cannot be compared fairly since these exposures are a matter of consumer choice. The choice to use coal tar as a treatment for a medical condition is weighed against the potential benefits of the exposure. Generally, medical treatments should be limited to those suffering a disease. Consumption of food containing PAHs (such as barbequed hamburgers) is also a matter of choice. While food exposures may be the greatest exposure to PAHs for most people, typically carcinogenic PAH concentrations in contaminated sediment and soil are considerably more than two (2) orders of magnitude higher than carcinogenic PAH concentrations in food. Environmental exposures to PAHs can be significant for some people. The MPCA is not focused on debating the science of how some PAHs have been classified as possible carcinogens, nor is the MPCA making claims or representing what possible hazards and risks there may be to human health. The MPCA is currently working with the Minnesota Department of Health to evaluate standards used to guide reuse and disposal options for contaminated sediment that are protective of human health. The MPCA is focused primarily on the high costs for managing stormwater sediments contaminated with PAHs associated with coal tar -based sealants. PAH compounds are accumulating in stormwater pond sediments, and municipalities are experiencing high costs to test, excavate, transport, and dispose of the contaminated sediment. Management costs vary based on size, volume of sediment, and laboratory analysis. Cost can be as much as $250,000 /pond in some communities. Anecdotal information provided by metro -area cities suggest that costs range from $75,000 to $125,000 /pond. In the seven county metropolitan area, there are an estimated 20,000 stormwater ponds. Conservative estimates suggest that management costs are measured by the billions of dollars for just the metro area. Municipalities cannot afford the costs, so projects are being delayed which is increasing risk to flood protection, damage to private and public infrastructure, and risks to water quality when contaminates flow through to lakes and rivers when stormwater ponds no longer function properly. Additional information about "Restriction on Coal Tar -Based Sealant" is available on the MPCA webpage at: httP: / /www.Dca. state. mn. us /index.phP/ water / water - types- and - programs /stormwater /municipal- stormwater /restriction -on -coal- tar - based - sealants.html Dianne Plunkett Latham Page 2 September 2, 2011 I hope this response.helps answer the questions most important to your upcoming meetings Dianne. Please do not hesitate to contact me at 651 - 757 -2223 if you have additional questions. Sincerely, Don Berger State Program Administrator Principal Stormwater Section Municipal Division DB:wgp Cost Estimates for Minnesota Stormwater Collection Systems Cost estimates are based on information and data available as of the fall of 2010 and are associated with the costs to manage only the most contaminated stormwater sediment (Level 3) which would be destined for disposal at a municipal solid waste landfill (MSW) facility. The intended purpose is to provide information for stormwater program planning; important policy decisions li ahead that will need to er informed by additional data that we don't yet have. Cost estimates As of fiscal year 2010; the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency estimate her ar appr im el 0,00 constructed stormwater retention ponds in the seven county metro ar a. T is es ' ate o e hat speculative, and a much different number could emerge when in- progress inventories by local governments are completed. Maintenance data is not available for these ponds, so it is not known how many are in need of maintenance. Estimates are provided here to extrapolate both volume and fiscal impact potentials. Stormwater sediment management costs for the seven county metropolitan area have the potential of being measured by the billion. Variables Cost estimates vary based on; • contractor and the amount of overhead • administrative mark up • competition in the market • fluctuation in the fuel market, and • complexity of the project. Projects are bid based on the complexity of the project which can be effected by: • availability and ease of access to the site • soil conditions • sensitivities to geologic and natural features (springs, wetlands, ORVW's) • depth to ground water • time of year, and • dewatering if required City of Minnetonka estimates A dredging cost equation was developed by Barr Engineering for the City of Minnetonka in 2009 as a way to estimate long term stormwater pond maintenance costs. A cost estimates equation was created which includes 30% for engineering and administration costs and 20% for contingencies. The equation does not include landfill disposal costs. Dredge Cost = 78,515 *Volume ^°'6n' This cost estimate was developed using 2009 dollars and volume is measured in acre -feet. The following example includes landfill costs for Level 3 sediments estimated at $14 per cubic yard in 2009. (Example provided by Michael Thompson, City Engineer, City of Maplewood, developed for the American Public Works Association conference in November of 2010) Example: 5,000 cubic yards of removal • Core samples /testing ($9,000) • Less than 93% retained on #1200 sieve — Lab tests define as Level 3 • Cost= 78,515 *3.1 ac ft^°-6727= ($168,000) • Cost to landfill = $14 1CY ($70,000) • TOTAL COST= $247,000 Overall cost per cubic yard = $49.40 Document Author: Don Berger, MPCA Municipal Division Draft Cost Estimates for Minnesota Stormwater Collection Systems White Bear Lake Cost per cubic yard estimates provided to the city of White Bear Lake.from actual bids. O Sediment sampling - $3,000 - $5,0.00 per pond, depending on size. o Excavati6n =$5.00 /Cubic Yard. o Transportation costs depend on the distance to the receiving facility and fluctuations . in the price point of the fuel market. Water content of the sediment and dewatering processes can be difficult and add expense. Transportation costs for White Bear Lake are approximately $21.00 /Cubic Yard to the Buffalo MSW Landfill. Disposal costs.also vary depending on disposal facility. Landfill cost at Buffalo. is $12.00 /Cubic Yard.` Landfill cost at Elk River is $10.50 /Cubic Yard. Landfill cost at . Rosemount is $ 22.50 /Cubic Yard. o Total cost [Sampling, Excavation ($5.00 C.Y.) + Transportation ($21.00 C.Y.) + Disposal.($12.00 /C.Y:) = $38.00 /C.Y.] Contractor mobilization-and other project construction costs are not included in this estimate but are estimated at 15% or $57,000. . Overall cost per cubic yard = $44.20 Based on these estimates the cost to manage Level(3) contaminated stormwater sediments will be approximately.$40 to,$50 per cubic yard. The following table provides estimates based on $50 per cubic yard and where the percentage is based.on estimated volumes from 20,000 ponds sediment regulated as level (3). This table provides estimates for: 1. various percentages of the estimated total ponds assumed to undergo sediment removal. 2. the approximate volume of cubic yards of sediment. 3. a comparison to the capacity of MSW daily cover volumes, and 4. projected costs for disposal in 2010 dollars. Estimated % of total Estimated Volume Cu /yards Compare to LFC Estimated Cost 50% 10,000,000 77 Times LFC 5 Billion 25% 5,000,000 38 Times LFC 2.5 Billion 10% 2,000,000 15 Times LFC 1 Billion Putting these estimates into perspective; if 10 municipalities in the metro area "cleaned.out just three ponds each @ 3,000 cubic yards per pond, the volume of sediment from these (30) ponds would equal 70% of the entire annual volume for all daily cover for all three MSW facilities combined. Even a far lower assumed percentage of all ponds (1% of the estimated total) with an average of 1,000 cubic yards per collection system would generate approximately 200,000 cubic yards of contaminated stormwater. sediment. This would still represent 1.5 times the MSW capacity for daily cover at a cost of approximately 10 million dollars. These estimates demonstrate the need and importance for discovering alternative management methods and collecting additional.data and information about new treatment methods. Pond inventory cost estimates: The cost to inventory and assess the status of constructed stormwater ponds in a cities jurisdiction will vary on whether the city is able to do the work with existing staff resources, or'whether they must contract for services. There is cost to the city either way, and these costs are more difficult to estimate. At this time it's not known how municipalities are /will respond to the requirement to inventory ponds within their jurisdictions. DocumentAuthor: Don Berger, MPCA Municipal Division "page 2 Cost Estimates for Minnesota Stormwater Collection Systems City of Alexandria example In July of 2010 the City of Alexandria took action to hire a contractor to compile an inventory of all stormwater ponds in the City. The low bid was $12,000 to do the inventory. The City meeting minutes don't describe what that cost covers and it is not known whether this amount includes spot sampling at select stormwater ponds. If the MS4's permitees all spent $10,000 each to inventory and assess the stormwater ponds in their jurisdiction; the permitted MS4's alone will spend about 2.3 Million Dollars. (link to Alexandria Council meeting minutes) http: // images. burrellesluce .com /image /19713NA/19713NA NA14410 &site =19713 Draft DocumentAuthor: Don Berger, MPCA Municipal Division Page 3 Coal- Tar -Based Pavement Sealcoat, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), and Environmental Health Studies by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) have identified coal- tar -based Sealcoat —the black, viscous liquid sprayed or painted on asphalt pavement such as parking lots —as a major source of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) contamination in urban areas for large parts of the Nation. Several PAHs are suspected human carcinogens and are toxic to aquatic life. Sealcoat is the black, viscous liquid sprayed or painted on the asphalt pavement of many parking lots, driveways, and playgrounds. Key Findings • Dust from pavement with coal- tar -based Sealcoat has greatly elevated PAH concentrations compared to dust from unsealed pavement. • Coal - tar -based sealcoat is the largest source of PAH contamination to 40 urban lakes studied, accounting for one -half of all PAH inputs. • Coal- tar -based sealcoat use is the primary cause of upward trends in PAHs, since the 1960s, in urban lake sediment. • Residences adjacent to parking lots with coal- tar -based sealcoat have PAH concentrations in house dust that are 25 times higher than those in house dust in residences adjacent to parking lots without coal -tar- based sealcoat. • PAHs move from a sealcoated surface into our environment by many mechanisms: storm runoff, adhesion to tires, wind, foot traffic, and volatilization. Adhesion Volatilization # A m tttt Original graphic courtesy of Aaron Hicks, City of Austin, Texas. Runoff U.S. Department of the Interior ® Fact Sheet 2011 -3010 U.S. Geological Survey Printed on recycled paper February 2011 What are Sealcoat, PAHs, and Coal Ta r? Pavement sealcoat (also called sealant) is a black liquid that is sprayed or painted on some asphalt pavement. It is marketed as protecting and beautifying the underlying pavement, and is used commercially and by homeowners across the Nation. It is applied to parking lots associated with commercial businesses, apartment and condominium complexes, churches, schools, and business parks, to residential driveways, and even to some playgrounds. Most sealcoat products have a coal - tar -pitch or asphalt (oil) base. Coal -tar -based sealcoat is commonly used in the central, southern, and eastern United States, and asphalt -based sealcoat is commonly used in the western United States. PAHs are a group of chemical compounds that form whenever anything with a carbon base is burned, from wood and gasoline to cigarettes and meat. PAHs also are in objects and materials, such as automobile tires and coal tar, the production of which involves the heating of carbon -based materials. PAHs are of environmental concern because several are toxic, carcinogenic, mutagenic, and/or teratogenic (causing birth defects) to aquatic life, and seven are probable human carcinogens (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2009). Coal tar is a byproduct of the coking of coal for the steel industry and coal -tar pitch is the residue remaining after the distillation of coal tar. Coal -tar pitch is 50 percent or more PAHs by weight and is known to cause cancer in humans (International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1980). Coal - tar -based sealcoat products typically are 20 to 35 percent coal -tar pitch. Product analyses indicate that coal -tar -based sealcoat products contain about 1,000 times more PAHs than sealcoat products with an asphalt base (City of Austin, 2005). How does Sealcoat get from Driveways and Parking Lots into Streams and Lakes, Homes, and the Air? Friction from vehicle tires abrades pavement sealcoat into small particles. These particles are washed off pavement by rain and carried down storm drains and into streams. Other sealcoat particles adhere to vehicle tires and are transported to other surfaces, blown offsite by wind, or tracked indoors on the soles of shoes. Some of the PAHs in sealcoat volatilize (evaporate), which is why sealed parking lots and driveways frequently give off a "mothball" smell. Sealcoat wear is visible in high traffic areas within a few months after application, and sealcoat manufacturers recommend reapplication every 2 to 4 years. -_15 1: ` 0 - W I" A0 AV Runoff from sealcoated pavement (black surface) enters storm drains that lead to local streams. Drain grate (inset) is marked "DUMP NO WASTE" and "DRAINS TO WATERWAYS." Gray asphalt pavement shows through where sealcoat has worn off the driveway of an apartment complex. _. The East -West Divide Regional Product Use Translates to Large Differences in PAH Concentrations Does product type really matter? PAH concentra- tions in the coal- tar -based sealcoat product are about 1,000 times higher than in the asphalt -based product (more than 50,000 milligrams per kilogram [mg /kg1 in coal - tar -based products and 50 mg/kg in asphalt - based products [City of Austin, 20051). Anecdotal reports, such as Web sites, blogs, and comments by industry representatives, indicate that the coal - tar -based product is used predominantly east of the Continental Divide and the asphalt -based product is used predominantly west of the Continental Divide. During 2007 -08, the USGS swept dust from seal - coated and unsealcoated parking lots in nine cities across the United States and analyzed the dust for PAHs. For six cities in the central and eastern United States, the median PAH concentration in dust from sealcoated parking lots was 2,200 mg/kg, about 1,000 times higher than in dust from sealcoated parking lots in the western United States, where the median concentration was 2.1 mg/kg. Although both product types are available nationally, these results confirm the regional difference in use patterns (Van Metre and others, 2009). Seattle 0 0 Portland Minneapolis 570 ••_ col ° 3,400 oa 1,300 2.10 o Chicago O O Detroit New Haven Salt Lake City ; v 3,200 O 3,200 \rJ _ Washington, D.C. Auusstin®2, Concentrations of PAHs in dust swept from sealed parking lots in central and eastern U.S. cities, where coal- tar - based - sealcoat use dominates, were about 1,000 times higher than in western U.S. cities, where asphalt- based - sealcoat use dominates. Concentrations shown on the map are the sum of 12 PAHs, in milligrams per kilogram (Van Metre and others, 20091. "Fingerprinting" Shows that Coal -Tar Sealant is the Largest Source of PAHs to Urban Lakes Z zQ O� a0 � J Z Y Z d oV) Ug a c9 J J Q J_ O� 100 80 60 40 20 0 Coal- tar -based sealcoat -�- Vehicle - related sources �- Wood combustion -� Fuel oil combustion -0 Coal combustion 1930 1950 1970 1990 2010 DATE SEDIMENT DEPOSITED Coal- tar -based sealcoat (orange symbol) is the largest contributor to increasing concentrations of PAHs in Lake Killarney, Orlando, Florida, as determined by chemical fingerprinting. Similar patterns were seen in lakes across the central and eastern United States (Van Metre and Mahler, 2010). PAHs are increasing in urban lakes across the United States. To better understand why this might be happening, USGS scientists collected sedi- ment cores from 40 lakes in cities from Anchorage, Alaska, to Orlando, Florida, analyzed the cores for PAHs, and determined the contribution of PAHs from many different sources by using a chemical mass - balance model. The model is based on differences in the chemical "fingerprint" of PAHs from each source. Coal- tar -based sealcoat accounted for one -half of all PAHs in the lakes, on average, while vehicle - related sources accounted for about one - fourth. Lakes with a large contribution of PAHs from sealcoat tended to have high PAH concentrations; in many cases, at levels that can be harmful to aquatic life. Analysis of historical trends in PAH sources to 8 of the 40 lakes indicates that sealcoat use is the primary cause of increases in PAH concentrations since the 1960s. Identifying where PAHs are coming from is essential for developing environmental management strategies (Van Metre and Mahler, 2010). From Outside to Inside Coal -Tar Pavement Sealant Linked to PAHs in House Dust House dust is an important source for human exposure to many contaminants, including PAHs. This is particularly true for small children, who spend time on the floor and put their hands and objects into their mouths. In 2008, the USGS measured PAHs in house dust from 23 ground -floor apartments and in dust from the apartment parking lots. Apartments with parking lots with coal- tar -based sealcoat had PAH concentrations in house dust that were 25 times higher, on average, than concentrations in house dust from apartments with parking lots with other surface types (concrete, unsealed asphalt, and asphalt -based sealcoat). PAH concentrations in the dust from the parking lots with coal- tar -based sealcoat were 530 times higher, on average, than concentrations on the parking lots with other surface types. Photograph obtained from Jupiter Images. What about other sources of PAHs? Although tobacco smoking, candle and incense burning, and barbecue and fireplace use have been suggested to affect PAH concentrations in house dust, this study found no relation between any of these, or the many other factors considered, and PAH concentrations in the house dust. The presence or absence of coal -tar- based sealcoat on the apartment complex parking lot was strongly correlated with PAH concentrations in house dust; the only other variable that was related to PAH concentrations in house dust was urban land -use intensity (the percentage of land near the apartment dedicated to multifamily residential, commercial, office, warehouse, or streets) (Mahler and others, 2010). J' 5.1 mg /kg ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑n F1 El Apartments with coal -tar -based sealcoat on the parking lot had much higher concentrations of PAHs, both in indoor dust and in parking lot dust, than apartments with an unsealed asphalt or concrete parking lot or with a parking lot with asphalt-based sealcoat. Concentrations shown are for the sum of the 16 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency priority pollutant PAHs (Mahler and others, 2010), in milligrams per kilogram (mg /kg). There are no U.S. health -based guidelines for chronic exposure to PAHs in house dust. The only existing guideline is for a single PAH— benzo[a]- pyrene — issued by the German Federal Environment Agency Indoor Air Hygiene Commission (Hansen and Volland, 1998). The guideline advises minimiz- ing exposure to concentrations of benzo[a]pyrene greater than 10 mg/kg in dust to avoid adverse health effects. That guideline was exceeded for 4 of the 11 apartments with coal- tar - sealcoated parking lots and for 1 of the 12 apartments with a parking lot with a different surface type. Also of concern is expo- sure to the sealcoated pavement surfaces themselves through play activities. Dust on some of the seal- coated parking lots had a concentration of benzo[a]- pyrene that was more than 50 times higher than the German guideline. Photograph courtesy of CLEARCorps, Durham, North Carolina. Our Environment and Us What are the Concerns? Some PAHs are toxic to mammals (including humans), birds, fish, amphibians (such as frogs and salamanders), and plants. The aquatic inverte- brates— insects and other small creatures that live in streams and lakes —are particularly susceptible to PAH contamination, especially those that live in the mud where PAHs tend to accumulate. These inver- tebrates are an important part of the food chain and are often monitored as indicators of stream quality (analogous to the "canary in the coal mine" con- cept). Possible adverse effects of PAHs on aquatic invertebrates include inhibited reproduction, delayed emergence, sediment avoidance, and mortality. Pos- sible adverse effects on fish include fin erosion, liver abnormalities, cataracts, and immune system impair- ments. The Probable Effect Concentration (PEC) of 22.8 mg /kg of total PAHs (MacDonald and others, 2000) —a widely used sediment quality guideline that is the concentration in bed sediment expected to have harmful effects on bottom - dwelling biota —is exceeded in one -third of the central and eastern U.S. urban lakes where PAH sources were studied. When turned over, red spotted newts that had been exposed to sediment contaminated with coal- tar -based sealcoat had difficulty righting themselves (Bommarito and others, 2010b). Poor reflexes could result in decreased survival. Photograph by Megan Gibbons, Birmingham - Southern College. Scientific studies have shown a relation between coal - tar -based pavement sealcoat and harmful effects on aquatic life. • Aquatic communities downstream from storm - water runoff from sealcoated parking lots were impaired (Scoggins and others, 2007). • Salamanders and newts exposed to sediment contaminated with coal- tar -based sealcoat had stunted growth, difficulty swimming or righting themselves, and liver problems (Bommarito and others, 2010a, b). • Frogs exposed to sediment contaminated with coal -tar -based sealcoat died, had stunted growth, or developed more slowly than usual (Bryer and others, 2006). Tumors in brown bullhead catfish from the Anacostia River, Washington, D.C., are believed to be related to elevated PAH concentrations (Pinkney and others, 2009). Photograph by A.E. Pinkney. Human health risk from environmental con- taminants usually is evaluated in terms of exposure pathways. For example, people could potentially be exposed to PAHs in sealcoat through ingestion of abraded particles from driveways, parking lots, or play grounds, or through skin contact with the abraded particles, either directly or by touching toys or other objects that have been in contact with the pavement. Inhalation of wind -blown particles and of fumes that volatilize from sealed parking lots are other possible pathways. PAHs in streams and lakes rarely pose a human health risk from contact recre- ation or drinking water because of their tendency to attach to sediment rather than to dissolve in water. Skin contact is one way humans can be exposed to PAHs. Parking lots and driveways with coal- tar -based sealcoat have concentrations of PAHs hundreds to thousands of times higher than those with asphalt -based sealcoat or no sealcoat. Photograph obtained from Corbis Images, Inc. TAII Q) What is coal tar? A) Coal tar is a thick, black or brown liquid that is a byproduct of the carbonization of coal for the steel industry or the gasification of coal to make coal gas. Q) What is the difference between crude coal tar, coal -tar pitch, and "refined" coal tar? A) Coal -tar pitch is the residue that remains after various light oils are distilled from crude coal tar for commercial use. The coal -tar pitch is then separated (refined) into 12 different viscosities, RT -1 (the most fluid) through RT -12 (the most viscous). RT -12 is the viscosity used in coal - tar -based pavement sealcoat. Q) How can I tell if a product contains coal tar? A) To determine if the product has a coal -tar base, look for the Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) number 65996 -93 -2 on the product Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS). The words "coal tar," "refined coal tar," "refined tar," "refined coal -tar pitch," or other similar terms may be listed on the MSDS or on the product container. Q) Is sealcoat used on roads? A) Use on roads is extremely rare. Occasionally a private property, such as a housing development, will choose to have the roads sealcoated. Q) Is use of coal - tar -based sealant regulated? A) Several jurisdictions, including the City of Austin, Texas, the City of Washington, D.C., Dane County, Wisconsin, and several suburbs of Minneapolis, Minnesota, have banned use of coal -tar -based sealcoat. Similar bans are under consideration in other jurisdictions. For more information on USGS research on PAHs and coal- tar -based sealcoat go to http: / /tx.usgs.gov /coring/ allthingssealcoat. httnl. Publishing support provided by Lafayette Publishing Service Center References Bommarito, T., Sparling, D.W., and Halbrook, R.S., 2010a, Toxicity of coal -tar pavement sealants and ultraviolet radia- tion to Ambystoma Maculatum: Ecotoxicology, v. 19, no. 6, p. 1,147- 1,156. Bommarito, T., Sparling, D.W., and Halbrook, R.S., 2010b, Toxicity of coal -tar and asphalt sealants to eastern newts, Notophthalmus viridescens: Chemosphere, v. 81, no. 2, p. 187 -193. Bryer, P.J., Elliott, J.N., and Willingham, E.J., 2006, The effects of coal tar based pavement sealer on amphibian development and metamorphosis: Ecotoxicology, v. 15, no. 3, p. 241 -247. City of Austin, 2005, PAHs in Austin, Texas, sediments and coal -tar based pavement sealants: Watershed Protection Department, 55 p., accessed September 14, 2010, at http: / /www. ci. austin. tx. uslwatershed ldownloadslcoaltar_ draft _pah studypdf. Hansen, D., and Volland, G., 1998, Study about the contamina- tion of PAH in rooms with tar parquetry adhesive: Otto -Graf- Journal, v. 9, p. 48-60. International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1980, Coal tars and coal tar pitches: accessed September 14, 2010, at http:// ntp. niehs. nih.govintplrocleleventh /profilesls048coal.pdf. MacDonald, D.D., Ingersoll, C.G., and Berger, T.A., 2000, Development and evaluation of consensus -based sediment quality guidelines for freshwater ecosystems: Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, v. 39, p. 20-31. Mahler, B.J., Van Metre, P.C., Wilson, J.T., Musgrove, M., Burbank, T.L., Ennis, T.E., and Bashara, T.J., 2010, Coal -tar- based parking lot sealcoat -An unrecognized source of PAH to settled house dust: Environmental Science and Technology, v. 44, p. 894 -900. Pinkney, A.E., Harshbarger, J.C., and Rutter, M.A., 2009, Tumors in brown bullheads in the Chesapeake Bay water- shed- Analysis of survey data from 1992 through 2006: Journal of Aquatic Animal Health, v. 21, p. 71 -81. Scoggins, M., McClintock, N., Gosselink, L., and Bryer, P., 2007, Occurrence of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons below coal- tar - sealed parking lots and effects on stream benthic macroinvertebrate communities: Journal of the North Ameri- can Benthological Society, v. 26, no. 4, p. 694 -707. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2009, Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS): accessed September 14, 2010, at http: / /cfpub. epa.gov/ncealiris /index. cfm. Van Metre, P.C., and Mahler, B.J., 2010, Contribution of PAHs from coal -tar pavement sealcoat and other sources to 40 U.S. lakes: Science of the Total Environment, v. 409, p. 334 -344. Van Metre, P.C., Mahler, B.J., and Wilson, J.T., 2009, PAHs underfoot - Contaminated dust from coal -tar sealcoated pavement is widespread in the United States: Environmental Science and Technology, v. 43, no. 1, p. 20-25. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. -B.J. Mahler and P.C. Van Metre AGENDA CITY COUNCIL MEETING CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA All agenda items listed on the consent agenda are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless requested to be removed from the Consent Agenda by a Member of the City Council. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered immediately following the adoption of the Consent Agenda. (Favorable rollcall vote of majority of Council Members present to approve.) A. Approval of Minutes — Regular Meeting of September 6, 2011, Work Session of September 6, 2011, B. Receive Payment Of Claims As Per: Pre -List Dated 9/8/2011, TOTAL $673,231.49; Pre - List Dated, 9/15/2011, TOTAL $1,197,537.53 C. Request For Purchase — Police & Fire Dispatch Stratus Server Replacement D. Award of Bid — Contract No. ENG 11 -12 Improvement No. A -241 West 70th Street Landscaping E. Resolution No. 2011 -90 Receive Feasibility Report And Support Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Stream Bank Restoration Project . V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS A. Hennepin County Update From Commissioner Jan Callison VI. COMMUNITY COMMENT During "Community Comment," the City Council will invite residents to share new issues or concerns that haven't been considered in the past 30 days by the Council or which aren't slated for future consideration. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes. The Mayor may limit the number of speaks on the same issue in the interest of time and topic. Generally speaking, items that are elsewhere on tonight's agenda may not be addressed during Agenda/Edina City Council September 20, 2011 Page 2 Community Comment. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments tonight. Instead the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. VII. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS: (Favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Resolution No. 2011 -89 Accepting Various Donations VIII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS IX. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS X. MANAGER'S COMMENTS XI. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952 - 927 - 886172 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Tues Sept 20 Work Session With Energy & Environment Commission 5:30 P.M. Tues Sept 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Sat Oct 1 Town Hall Meeting 10:00 a.m. — Noon Tues Oct 4 Work Session — Human Services Task Force Funding Rec 5:30 P.M. Tues Oct 4 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Oct 18 Work Session — Review Proposal City Economic Dev. & Svc. 5:30 P.M. Tues Oct 18 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Nov 1 Regular Council Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Nov 8 ELECTION DAY — POLLS OPEN 7:00 A.M. UNTIL 8:00 P.M. Tues Nov 15 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Thur Nov 24 THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Fri Nov 25 DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Dec 6 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Dec 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Mon Dec 26 CHRISTMAS HOLDIAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS EDINA SENIOR CENTER COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBER' COUNCIL CHAMBER. MINUTES ` OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE' EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 6, 2011 7:00 P.M. I. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Hovland called the meeting.to order at 7:00 p.m. 11. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members'Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and!Mayor Hovland: 111. MEETING AGENDA APPROVED AS- REVISED Member Sprague made a motion, seconded' by Member Bennett, approving the meeting. agenda as revised to reorder Item VIII.D., Sketch Plan Review, 6996 France Avenue,Io Item VIII.A add'.Item VIII.E., Special Assessment Interest'Rate'— Deviation from Policy:, Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV. CONSENT AGENDA APPROVED AS REVISED Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving the consent agenda as revised to remove Items IV.D., Resolution No. 2011 -83 Setting the Hearing Dates for Special Assessments & Utility Certification (10/4/2011 & 10/18/2011); IV.G., Safe Routes To School Notice; IV.K., Resolution No. 2011 -86 Providing For the Sale of $15,100,660.G. O. Bonds, Series 2011A; and, to continue Item IV.E, Public Improvement and Special Assessments Agreements — Minnehaha Wood Area, as follows: IV.A. Approve the Work Session of August 15, 2011, Regular Meeting of August 16, 2011, Work Session of August 16, 2011, Work'Session of August 23, 2011, and Work Session of August 30, 2011 IV.B. Receive payment of the following claims as shown in detail on.thie Check Register dated August 18, 2011, and consisting of 34 pages; "General Fund $384,641:91; Communications Fund $1,035:43; City Hall Debt Service $100.00;. Working Capital Fund $21,748:16; Equipment Replacement Fund $28,856:34; Construction' Fund $1,399.50; Art Center Fund $4,625.77; Golf Dome Fund $100.78;, Aquatic Center Fund $157,680.02;' Golf Course Fund $65,765.59; Ice Arena Fund $22,922:91; Edinborough /Cen ten nial -Lakes . Fund $11,946.45; Liquor Fund $201,527.90; Utility Fund $199,812..24 ;'St6rm 5ewer Fund $5,028:67; PSTF Agency Fund $9;365.55; TOTAL S1.116.497.22 and %for approval of payment of claims dated August 25, 2011, and consisting of 31 pages; General Fund $163,834.16; Communications Fund $1,694.18; Police Special Revenue $206.58; Braemar Memorial Fund $42.00; Working 'Capital Fund $1,394,680.84; Equipment Replacement Fund $4,221.38; Construction Fund-$400,009.47; Art Center Fund $19,678.75; Golf Dome Fund $426.15; Aquatic Center Fund $8,932.47; Golf Course Fund $21,844.13; Ice Arena Fund $8,581.22; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $12,582.76; Liquor Fund'$88,050.52; Utility Fund $1,217,351.64; Storm Sewer Fund $729,460.14;.Recycling.Fund r $32.68; PSTF Agency Fund $124.98; Payroll Fund $5,044.44; TOTAL S4.076.798.49; and for'approval of payment.of claims dated September 1, 2011, and consisting of 30 pages; General Fund $96,258.52; Communications Fund $1,004.69; Police Special Revenue $470.00;. Working Capital Fund.$38,575.34; Equipment Replacement Fund $8,397.61; Art Center Fund $24,815.26; Aquatic Center Fund $1,444.86; Golf Course Fund $2,008.77; Ice, Arena Fund $1,957.65; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $27,625.47; Liquor Fund $219,514.64; Utility. Fund '$35,140.38; Storm Sewer Fund $31,179.88; PSTF Agency Fund $3,211.03; Payroll Fund $3,061.04; TOTAL $494.611.14. IV.C. Adopt Resolution No. 2011 -82 Authorizing Public Health Emergency Preparedness Cooperative Agreement Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /September 6, 2011 IV.D. Re-se-li-AlaM Ale. 2-0-3-1-4-2 Sietting the HeaFiAg gates fGF Special Asseessimleents & Utility CeFtifientien /9A/A /9091 &!(WMo /2n+ +) IV.E. - Continued Indefinitely IV.F. Approve Traffic Safety Report of August 3, 2011 IV.G. IV.H. Approve Authorization to Participate In 2012 Fuel Consortium IV.I. Award of Quote - Improvement No. BA -392, Mill and Overlay Gus Young Lane & Arcadia Avenue, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Midwest Asphalt Corporation at $37,383.50 IV.J. Award of Bid - Contact No. PIN 11 -3 Improvement No. WM -499 & WM -500 Raw Water Main Piping, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, G.M. Contracting, Inc. at $919,218.65 IV.K. IV.L. Set 2012 Budget and Levy Hearing and Budget and Levy Adoption Meeting (12/06/2011) IV.M. Authorize Travel for Mayor Hovland IV.N. Request for Purchase - Basketball Court Renovation - Countryside Park, awarding the bid to the recommended low bidder, Finley Bros., Inc. at $22,770.00 IV.O. Adopt Resolution No. 2011 -88 Approving Final Plat at 5829 Brookview Avenue for Kirby Herman IV.P. Approve Formation of Edina Transportation Commission's Transportation Options Subcommittee IV.Q. Approve Amendment to Liquor License Rice Paper Restaurant Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA IV.D. RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -83 ADOPTED -SETTING THE HEARING DATES FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS & UTILITY CERTIFICATION(10 /18/2011) The Council noted that Mayor Hovland would not be in attendance at the October 4, 2011, Regular Meeting, and discussed scheduling the assessment hearings for reconstruction projects to be assessed under Minnesota Statute 429 when a full Council was in attendance. Public Works Director /City Engineer Houle indicated all public hearings including the maintenance hearings could be scheduled for October 18, 2011. Mayor Hovland introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -83 as revised, Calling Public Hearings for consideration of certain special assessments and delinquent utilities, setting October 18, 2011 as the public hearing date for all Minnesota Statute 429 Improvements, for the maintenance special assessments and for the delinquent utilities. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IV.G. SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL NOTICE RECEIVED - OVERALL SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL PLAN AUTHORIZED The Council noted the State of Minnesota had beefy awarded $3.8 million for Safe Routes to School. Mr. Houle reported the City had not received funding for its Safe Routes to School request and recommended . the City and School District create a committee to draft an overall Safe Routes to School Plan. The Council concurred and requested staff approach the School District about that option. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, authorizing the creation of an overall Safe Routes to School Plan for inclusion in future non - motorized plans. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. W.K. RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -86 ADOPTED -PROVIDING FOR THE SALE OF $15,100,000 G. O. BONDS, SERIES 2011A Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /September 6. 2011 Finance Director Wallin provided an explanation of the debt service schedule. Member Brindle ; introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -86, providing for the sale of $15,100,000 General Obligation Bonds, Series 2011A. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. V. SPECIAL RECOGNITIONS AND PRESENTATIONS V.A. CONSTITUTION WEEK PROCLAIMED Mayor Hovland read in': full a proclamation declaring September 17 -23, 2011, as Constitution Week. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving proclamation declaring September 17 -23, 2011, as Constitution Week in the City of Edina. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague; Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Diana Lynch, 5936 Grove Street, received .the proclamation on behalf of the Daughters of the American Revolution and thanked the City for its continued service and recognizing the patriots who fought and sacrificed for our freedom. V.B. RESOLUTION NO. 2011-89 ADOPTED —JOINING THE NATIONAL MOMENT OF REMEMBRANCE OF THE 16' ANNIVERSARY OF SEPTEMBER 11' Mayor Hovland presented the request of Senator Frank Lautenberg and read in full a resolution joining in the national Moment of Remembrance on September 11,. 2011, at 1:00 p:m. EDT. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of. Resolution No. 2011 -89, joining the National Moment of Remembrance on the 101h anniversary of September 11th. Member Brindle seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Vt. PUBLIC HEARINGS HELD — Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. VI.A. TEMPORARY INTOXICATING ON -SALE LIQUOR LICENSE, CHURCH OF ST. PATRICK APPROVED Police Chief Long presented the request of the Church of St. Patrick for a temporary intoxicating on -sale liquor license for its Fall Festival event on September 17, 2011. He indicated the church had filed the necessary paPerwork, met all requirements of City code, and past events had not resulted in any complaints. Mayor Hovland opened the public, hearing at 7:24 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, approving a temporary intoxicating on -sale liquor license for the Church of St. Patrick's Fall Festival event on September 17, 2011. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.B. INTOXICATING ON -SALE AND SPECIAL SUNDAY ON -SALE LIQUOR. LICENSES, CALIFORNIA PIZZA KITCHEN APPROVED Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /September 6, 2011 City Clerk Mangen explained that new ownership made it necessary-for California Pizza Kitchen, 1690 Southdale Center, to make application for a new license and reported it had filed the necessary paperwork and that staff recommended issuance of the licenses. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:25 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Brindle, approving a new On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License and Sunday On -Sale Liquor License to California Pizza Kitchen, Inc., dba California Pizza Kitchen, for the period beginning September 6, 2011, and ending March 31, 2012. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VI.C. PRELIMINARY PLAT AND FINAL PLAT, ONE CORPORATE CENTER 2 LLC -RESOLUTION NO. 2011-84 ADOPTED Planning Director Teague presented the request of One Corporate Center 2 LLC for Preliminary Plat and Final Plat approval to divide its property at 7401 Metro Boulevard into two lots for the purpose of selling the new lot for future development. He advised the Planning Commission had recommended approval subject to the findings and conditions as set forth in the staff report dated August 17, 2011, in addition to a condition that a shared parking agreement be recorded between the two lots with the plat. The Council discussed the request and asked questions of Mr. Teague relating to a shared parking arrangement. It was noted the parking requirement of the current site was 454 stalls and was over parked with 557 stalls. Mayor Hovland opened the public hearing at 7:34 p.m. Public Testimony No one appeared to comment. Member Sprague made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Brindle introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -84,, Approving a Preliminary and Final Plat for 7401 Metro Boulevard, based on the following findings: 1. The existing roadways would support the proposed new lot. 2. There would be adequate parking to support future development. 3. The proposed plan meets all Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance requirements. And subject to the following conditions: 1. Site Plan approval is required for development of the new lot. 2. Park dedication fee of $7,100 is due prior to the City's release of the signed Final Plat mylars for recording with Hennepin County. 3. A shared parking agreement must be recorded between the two lots. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /September 6. 2011 Motion carried. VII. COMMUNITY COMMENT Wayne Carlson, 523 Coventry Lane, asked the Council to reconsider his request to have four dogs at his residence. The Council accepted the submittal and referred the request to staff for investigation. Vlll. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS VIII.A. SKETCH PLAN REVIEWED — 6996 FRANCE AVENUE City Planner Presentation Mr. Teague presented the applicant's proposal to tear down the existing BP automobile service station at 6996 France Avenue and build a new 6,600- square -foot retail building. He also presented the request of the applicant for a rezoning to PUD or PCD -1. Mr. Teague referenced the Planning Commission's comments, noting it was currently undertaking a Small Area Plan with the Grandview District and did not believe this proposal would rise to the level of requiring a Small Area Plan. It was noted that while the Planning Commission was concerned with the Comprehensive Plan and limited retail west of France Avenue, it was comfortable with a PUD rezoning on this site. Mr. Teague indicated this proposal would require a rezoning; therefore, the Council was being asked to determine whether to require a Small Area Plan and to provide general comments on the site plan. Proponent Presentation Dean Dovolis, DJR Architects, presented the sketch plan for a small building containing office and retail tenants at the corner of the site with parking to the rear. Construction materials would include a combination of stone, glass, and copper with signage on raised corners and create a transition to the 701h Street green corridor between the roundabouts. Mr. Dovolis explained how the project would address the street and pedestrian nature of the Southdale area, create a gateway to the 701h Street reconstruction project, and positively impact future development in this area. The Council discussed the sketch plan and asked questions of Mr. Dovolis relating to parking and pedestrian pathways. Mr. Dovolis advised that the sketch plan, as proposed, identified 34 parking spaces, four spaces short of the ordinance requirement and explained why under building underground parking would not be feasible on this small -sized lot. It was noted that use of the right -of -way corridor could ease access off 70th Street by the day care location. Mr. Dovolis indicated he would determine whether easement rights existed; however, using that option might impact several parking spaces. The Council discussed its support for the presented sketch plan and building renditions that incorporated a front glass curtain wall. It was noted this type of building appeared appealing and would revitalize that corner with a use that was compatible with the Galleria. Mr. Dovolis indicated the project would incorporate storm sewer practices such as pervious pavers in addition to green building techniques. The consensus of the Council was to favor the use of a PUD, that the request does not reach the threshold to require a Small Area Plan and that the sketch plan was reasonable. VIII.B. RESOLUTION NO. 2011-87 ADOPTED —ADOPTING PRELIMINARY 2012 TAX LEVY AND OPERATING BUDGET Mr. Wallin presented the draft resolution setting the maximum proposed 2012 tax levies and indicated that if approved, the 1.8% increase would be the maximum property tax increase the City could levy. He stated the Council could reduce the levy and that expenditures and revenues could change prior to final budget adoption. The Council acknowledged that the 1.8% increase would be reflected in the tax notification received by residents in September. Member Swenson introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -87, adopting the proposed budget for the City of Edina for year 2012, and establishing the proposed tax levy payable in 2012. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /September 6. 2011 Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIILC. RESOLUTION NO. 2011-85 ADOPTED —ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Bennett introduced and moved adoption of Resolution No. 2011 -85, accepting various donations. Member Sprague seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII.D. GRANDVIEW SMALL AREA PLAN REPORT RECEIVED —CONSULTANT SERVICES AUTHORIZED Planning Commissioner Michael Fischer and Community Advisory Team /Executive Committee Team Member Larry Chestler updated the Council relating to the Grandview Small Area Plan planning process. The three phases were described that would convert the seven guiding principles into a specific guide plan. Mr. Chestler asked the Council to approve the work plan going forward and authorize the Professional Services Agreement with the Cuningham Group to engage the consultant team aA4 to assist in the preparation of a Small Area Plan for the Grandview District. The Council extended its appreciation to those who had dedicated themselves to this project. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, authorizing the Professional Services Agreement with the Cunningham Group to assist in the preparation of a Small Area Plan for Grandview District to be funded fully from the Livable Communities grant. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. VIII. E. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT INTEREST RATE —SINGULAR DEVIATION FROM POLICY APPROVED Mr. Wallin explained he was recommending a variance from the City's Special Assessment Policy for the 2010 Street Reconstruction Projects that would be specially assessed in October. He said the Special Assessment Policy specified the interest rate be set at two percent over the bond issue interest. Mr. Wallin said there were bond proceeds from the 2008 sale left that could fund the 2010 projects due to the high number of pre - payments received from the Country Club project. Mr. Wallin recommended the Council authorize use of the remaining 2008 bond proceeds, but that the interest rate of 4.3% based on the 2010 bond proceeds be charged for those projects being specially assessed this fall. The Council discussed the recommendation and asked questions of Mr. Wallin and Attorney Knutson. Mr. Knutson advised that due to the unique circumstances, this recommended singular deviation from the policy could be considered without establishing precedent. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Sprague, approving a singular deviation from the special assessment interest rate policy. allowing all PFGIeds. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. IX. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS — Mayor Hovland acknowledged the Council's receipt . of various correspondence. X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS — Received XI. MANAGER'S COMMENTS — Received XI.A. TLC GRANT PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT, PROCESS AND TIMELINE AUTHORIZED Page 6 Minutes /Edina City Council /September 6. 2011 Manager Neal advised the TLC was requesting a commitment from the City to work with the public to remove parking on Wooddale Avenue or add shared lane FnaFki ^ ^s an advisory bike lanes in conjunction_ with eliminating the center stripe on Wooddale Avenue. The TLC supported a public process to gain tsits public input and request the City submit a timeline by September 15, 2011. Mr. Houle outlined the proposed schedule and answered the Council's questions regarding addressing parking on Wooddale Avenue. The. Council discussed whether the possibility existed to realign the centerline without eliminating parking on Wooddale Avenue. Mr. Houle • explained a variance from State Aid standards would be needed for such realignment, but all options would be considered. The Council acknowledged the TLC was offering two alternatives for grant funding. Mr. Neal indicated.that appeared to be the case and explained the Council must determine if there was public support for either alternative. Member Brindle made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, authorizing the tentative project schedule as presented by staff. Ayes: Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. XI.B. CITY MANAGER SIX -MONTH PERFORMANCE REVIEW PERFORMED Mayor Hovland.indicated the full Council and PDI Ninth House consultant Harry Brull met.in closed session on August 23, 2011, to address Manager Neal's six -month job performance. He reported Manager Neal received strongly favorable ratings from the Council and staff. XII. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:28 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Minutes approved by Edina City Council, September 20, 2011. Video Copy of the September 6, 2011, meeting available. Page 7 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL SEPTEMBER.6, 2011 5:07 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to :order at 5:07 p.m. in the Community Room: of City Hall. Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Brindle, Sprague, Swenson and Mayor Hovland: Staff attending the meeting. included: Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications & Marketing Director; Wayne Houle, Director of Public Works /City Engineer; Steve Kirchman, Building Official; Karen Kurt, Assistant City Manager; Jeff Long, Police Chief; Debra Mangen,: City Clerk; Ed, MacHolda, Assistant Park and Recreation Director; Scott Neal, City Manager; ,Eric Roggeman, Assistant Finance Director; Lisa Schaefer, Human Resources Director; Marty Scheer.er;; Fire Chief; Matt Sisterman, IT Director; Ceil. Smith, Assistant to the City Manager; Jesse Struve, Utility Engineer; Cary Teague, Planning Director; John Wallin, Finance Director; and Bob Wilson, City Assessor. Mayor Hovland.stated the purpose of the meeting was to continue their review of the 2012 -2013 Budgets begun at the last work session. Manager Neal stated staff would like the City Council, after receiving the information regarding the proposed 2012 -2013 General Fund and Utility Fund Budget and Capital Improvement Program and discussing it, to endorse the proposed Utility budget and direct staff to begin the rate study and to endorse the proposed General Fund operating budget. Mr. Neal along with Engineer Houle, Finance Director Wallin and, Assistant Finance Director Roggeman reviewed the proposed 2012 —2013 Utility Fund operating budget and proposed 2012.= 2016 Utility Fund Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) ' :The Council asked questions of staff regarding the budget and CIP. Their questions included: potential lead removal at the Braemar Work Site, new water treatment facility, pond.dredging, facility manager, could. any equipment purchases be delayed, and potential utility technology updates. Staff responded to the questions. The Council will have another opportunity to review the CIP later in the fall. The Council directed staff to complete the rate study and gave their endorsement of the proposed budget as presented. Mr. Neal moved into an explanation of his recommendation for the 2012 - 2013 General Fund Operating budgets. In 2012 the General Fund total tax, levy would increase 1.8 %, and in 2013 the total tax levy would increase 2.5 %. He said his scenario's goals were to: stabilize operations with a focus on performance, to keep compensation near market levels, to stabilize employee headcount and to maximize the use of available unreserved fund balances. Mr. Neal said there was an unreserved fund balance of near 2.4 million dollars that he would propose to utilize in the following ways to achieve the proposed total tax levies and achieve his.stated goals: use approximately $1.5 million dollars to buy down the 2012 debt service by. $378,530, ,pre -pay City special assessments of $155,000 and to pre -pay callable long term bonds in the amount of $950,000. By doing so, the City would realize a potential savings of approximately $500,000.00 and the 2012 -2013 tax levies would remain within the stated goals. The Council and staff reviewed the budget scenario. Jr Minutes /Edina City Council Work Session /September 6, 201 The Council reviewed the estimated property tax impact of the proposed budgets on both residential and commercial /industrial properties. They discussed the changes in statutes that removed the Market Value Homestead Credit that was replaced with the Market Value Homestead Exclusion. The Council will review the enterprise and Park CIP budget and Human Services funding plan at their October 4 Work Session, and they will review the final CIP and draft utility rate study at their October 18 Work Session. On November 1St, they will review the final levy and budget, adopt the final CIP and adopt the final rate study. On December 6th, the Council will hold a public hearing for the final levy and budget and review the 2012 fees and utility charges ordinance for the first reading. Finally, on December 20th, the final levy and 2012 fees and utility charges will be adopted. Following discussion, the Council had the opportunity to ask questions of staff on specific items and gave direction to staff to proceed with preparation of the 2012 -2013 General Fund Operating Budgets as presented. Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 6:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Minutes approved by Edina City Council, September 20, 2011 James B. Hovland, Mayor N R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 917/2011 9:55:44 Council Check Register Page - 1 9/8/2011 -918/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 351094 91812011 104878 AA EQUIPMENT COMPANY 736.03 COOLER SLIDES 270299 2401 5821.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 736.03 351095 91812011 125198 AARSVOLD, KRISTIN 53.28 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 270465 090111 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 53.28 351096 91812011 124613 ABM JANITORIAL - NORTH CENTRAL 2,695.87 SEPT 2011 SERVICES 270338 2922889 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,695.87 351097 91812011 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY i _ 77.00 270217 0726359 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 104.60 270218 0726355 '5862.5515 • COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 72.60 270219 0726358 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX BOTH ST SELLING 46.70 270354 0917055 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 69.80 270474 0815356 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 83.00 270574 0815359 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 453.70 351098 91812011 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 38.94 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 270339 108544 5821.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 99.65 270340 108703 1550.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 88.53 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 270378 108545 5430.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 41.21 270379 108543 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY 107.03 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 270539 108542 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 375.36 351099 91812011 101115 AMERIPRIDE SERVICES 51.76 270466 083111 5821.6201 LAUNDRY BOTH ST OCCUPANCY 57.06 270466 083111 5841.6201 LAUNDRY YORK OCCUPANCY 123.30 270466 083111 5861.6201 LAUNDRY VERNON OCCUPANCY 143.34 270466 083111 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 161.40 270466 083111 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 234.83 270466 083111 1551.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL 486.84 270466 083111 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,258.53 351100 918/2011 100665 AMSAN 132.24 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00001723 270505 250900321 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 132.24 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 917/2011. 9:55:44 Council Check Register Page - 2 9/8/2011 -918/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description. Business Unit 351101 9/812011 101874 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC. 153.40 BATTERIES 270380 24280 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 153.40 351102 91812011 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 1,323.78 FOOD 270381 1606190 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 628.76 FOOD 270382 1609239 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 73.50- CREDIT 270383 1606788 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 2,541.20 CONCESSION EQUIPMENT 270540 1608051 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 4,620.24 351103 9181201/ 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 99.54 COFFEE 270135 420941 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 280:60 COFFEE 270341 421006 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRALS ERVICES GENERAL 55.06- CREDIT 270342 421008 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 171.22 COFFEE 270506 420996 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 496.30 351104 9/812011 114476 ARMOR SECURITY INC. 96.19 ALARM MONITORING 00001831 270507 155315 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 144.28 00001832 270508 155314 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES -- BUILDING MAINTENANCE 240.47 351105 91812011 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 33.00 270541 090111 5821.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 33.28 270541 090111 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 46.03 270541 090111 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 59.18 270541 090111 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 73.92 270541 090111 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 82.60 270541 090111 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 84.97 270541 090111 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 101.98 270541 090111 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 135.08 270541 090111 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 153.35 270541 090111 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 197.25 270541 090111 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 238.05 270541 090111 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 238.25 270541 090111 ` 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 298.39 270541 090111 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 298.40 270541 090111 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 301.70 270541 090111 5311.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL POOL OPERATION 319.55 270541 090111 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL R55CKREG LOG20000 23270354.00 -186 5932.6103 270137 CITY OF EDINA 5913.6103 270467 23271180.00 -3 10044.1705.20 270468 23271180.00 -1 Council Check Register 270469 23271180.OD -2 10044.1705.20 270220 59765500 5842.5515 9/8/2011 -9/8/2011 5842.5512 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5862.5515 270225 411.40 5842.5515 270541 090111 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 59862800 5862.5512 618.12 85706400 270541 090111 5620.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 3;724.50 351106 9/8/2011 101195 AUTO ELECTRIC OF BLOOMINGTON I 16.03 PULLEY 00005346 270384 149743 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 16.03 351107 9/812011 100637 AUTOMOBILE SERVICE CO. 65.79 FRONT ALIGNMENT 00005348 270300 62242 1553.6581 GASOLINE 65.79 351108 91812011 120995 AVR INC. 1,483.43 READY -MIX 00001838 270385 51471 5932.6520 CONCRETE 1,011.04 270386 51625 5932.6520 CONCRETE 152.30 CONCRETE FOR BIKE RACKS 00001830 270509 51717 1647.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK 2,646.77 351109 9/8/2011 100638 BACHMAN'S _ 91712011 9:55:44 Page - 3 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL STORM SEWER GENERAL STORM SEWER PATHS & HARD SURFACE 48.48 PLANTS 270525 082011, 5630.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES 92.25 FLOWERS 270525 082011 5422.6275 COURSE BEAUTIFICATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 140.73 351110 91812011 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 234.00 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 415.00 WATER RESOURCES MGMT 216.00 LIFT STATION #1 PROJECT 1 pan Sn 351111 91812011 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 73.10 836.55 422.20 1,174.93 538.91 267.15 1,421.28 477.40 7.43 5,218.95 270136 23270354.00 -186 5932.6103 270137 , 23271072.00 -20 5913.6103 270467 23271180.00 -3 10044.1705.20 270468 23271180.00 -1 10044.1705.20 270469 23271180.OD -2 10044.1705.20 270220 59765500 5842.5515 270221 59772000 5842.5512 270222 59373600 5842.5513, 270223 59765600 5842.5513 270224 6102700 5862.5515 270225 85672700 5842.5515 270475 59394000 5862.5513 270575 59862800 5862.5512 270576 85706400 5822.5515 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES' GENERAL STORM SEWER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION - -CONSULTING DESIGN LS44 LIFT STATION 1 REHAB CONSULTING DESIGN LS44 LIFT STATION 1 REHAB CONSULTING DESIGN LS44 LIFT STATION 1 REHAB COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING. YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 9/7/2011 9:55:44 Page- 4 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL STORM LIFT STATION MAINT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 452.50 270226 104684 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 452.50 351117 91812011 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 42.28 SEALS 00005355 270301 548591 Counci[Check Register REPAIR PARTS 42.28 9/8/2011 -918/2011 351118 91812011 Check # Date - Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description- 270387 083011 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 23.58 PETTY CASH ` 351112 91812011 GENERAL SUPPLIES 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS PETTY CASH 270387 083011 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 55.53 DESK SUPPLIES 270343 WO- 714337 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES 37.54 13.88 270344 OE- 264783 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 38.35 PETTY CASH 92.95 INTEROFFICE ENVELOPES 270345 WO- 715832 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PETTY CASH 270387 21,48 BINDER CLIPS 270346 WO- 716423 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 270387 083011 39.39 OFFICE SUPPLIES 270347 WO- 716374 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 083011 5420.6530 223.23 53.98 PETTY CASH 270387 - 351113 91812011 360.43 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 348.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003640 27054.2 70856 1470.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES' 348.28 351114 9/8/2011 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 125.26 GENERATOR CORD 00001775 270138 902794933 5934.6530 REPAIR PARTS 125.26 351115 9/812011 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 2,640.37 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003615 270543 87281015 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 2,640.37 351116 9/812011 119351 BOURGETIMPORTS 9/7/2011 9:55:44 Page- 4 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL STORM LIFT STATION MAINT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 452.50 270226 104684 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 452.50 351117 91812011 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 42.28 SEALS 00005355 270301 548591 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 42.28 351118 91812011 100663 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 13.93 PETTY CASH 270387 083011 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 23.58 PETTY CASH 270387 083011 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 24.66 PETTY CASH 270387 083011 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 33.14 PETTY CASH 270387 083011 5430.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 37.54 PETTY CASH 270387 083011 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 38.35 PETTY CASH 270387 083011 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 38.76 PETTY CASH 270387 083011 5422.6581 GASOLINE' 45.00 PETTY CASH 270387 083011 5410.6105 DUES &`SUBSCRIPTIONS 51.49 _PETTY CASH 270387 083011 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS 53.98 PETTY CASH 270387 083011 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 360.43 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GOLF ADMINISTRATION CLUB HOUSE RANGE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GOLF ADMINISTRATION RICHARDS GOLF COURSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GOLF ADMINISTRATION CLUB HOUSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9x7/2011 9:55:44 Council Check Register Page - 5 9/8/2011 -918/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 351119 91812011 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 1,055.75 MATERIALS TESTING 270139 338620 01384.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION RIDGE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION 955.00 MATERIALS TESTING 270140 338619 01371.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -371 KILLARNEY SHORES 175.00 STEEL TESTING 270544 338709 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 2,185.75 351120 9/8/2011 103239 BRIN NORTHWESTERN GLASS CO. 234.00 DOOR REPAIR 00001487 270141 516646S 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 495.67' DOOR REPAIR 270545 516689S 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 729.67 351121 9/812011 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 789.81 NEWSLETTER 00006263 270388 25622 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 789.81 351122 91812011 103244 BURTIS, ROBERT 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 9/8/11 270536 083111 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 351123 9/812011 129499 CANAKES, SCOTT 56.40 PERMIT REFUND 270142 ED108909 1495.4115 MECHANICAL PERMITS INSPECTIONS 56.40 351124 9/812011 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 101.40 270143 956778 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 83.20 270227 958266 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 6,069.80 270577 958267 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 6,254.40 351125 9/812011 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 325.85 5546504 -1 270144 5546504 -8/11 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,305.57 5591458 -4 270145 5591456 -8/11 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 19.23 5528973 -0 270146 5528973 -8111 1552.6186 HEAT_ CENT SVC PW BUILDING 14.64 5596524 -8 270147 55965248/11 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 89.43 5584304 -9 270510 55843048/11 7411.6166 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 12.82 5584310 -6 270511 5584310 -8111 7413.6186 HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER 12.82 5590919 -6 270512 5590919 -8/11 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 1,780.36 351126 91812011 119661 CENTRAL ENVELOPE CORPORATION 143.00 NEWSLETTER 270302 69648 2210.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 143.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA - 9/712011 9:55:44 . Council Check Register Page - 6 9/8/2011 -9/8/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 351127 91812011 123898 CENTURYLINK 55.75 '9529 29-0297 270303 0297 -8/11 4090:6188 TELEPHONE 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 324.45 952 927 -8861 270304 8861 =8/11 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 236:75 952 831 -0024 270470 0024 -8/11 1552.6188 TELEPHONE CENT SVC PW BUILDING 616.95 351128 '91812011 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 248.80 270228 453712 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 375.75 270229 453515 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER ° 50TH ST SELLING 624.55 351129 91812011 127247 CITY OF EDINA - AQUATIC CENTS 69.80 AQUAFINA, COOKIES 270389 083011 54.21.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 69.80 351130 918/2011 122317 CITY OF EDINA - COMMUNICATIONS 80.16 DVDS OF THEATER CAMP 270305 COM1042 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 80.16 351131 9/812011 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 579.42 XCEL ENERGY FOR LS 270390 4964 5934.6185 LIGHT & POWER STORM LIFT STATION MAINT 579.42 351132 918/2011 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 120.87 , DIPSTICK 00005060 270391 132547 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 84.69 HANDLES 00005358 270392 135944 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 430.21 SENSOR, BOLT STRIKERS 00005094 270393 139523 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 635.77 351133 91812011 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 89,883.52 ASPHALT 00001837 270395 081511. - 1314.6518 BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION 89,883.52 351134. 91812011 - 101395 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 27.14 BITUMINOUS PLANT INSPECTION 270148 PA000205301 01389.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 69TH ST EAST BOUND M &O 238.68 CONCRETE PLANT INSPECTIONS 270148 PA000205301 01367.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC: IMPLEMENT 265.82- _ 351135 918/2011 101704 COOK, BARBARA 755.16 PROGRAM COORDINATOR 270394 11 -1579 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 755.16 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/8/2011 -9/8/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 351136 9/812011 124910 COURSE TRENDS INC. 100.00 EMAIL MARKETING SOFTWARE 270396 176318 5410.6122 100.00 351137 91812011 121340 CRETEX CONCRETE PRODUCTS MIDWE 461.70 ADJUSTING RINGS 00061789 270397 5000024025 5932.6520 461.70 351138 91812011 102514 CUTTER & BUCK 170.08 MERCHANDISE 270398 91843820 5440.5511 49.40 - CREDIT 270399 91856326 5440.5511 120.68 351139 91812011 100706 D.C. ANNIS SEWER INC. 539.00 PUMP SUMP, TRENCH DRAINS 270546 84705 1470.6215 539.00 351140 9/812011 121618 DAKOTA SUPPLY GROUP 1,288.91 4" TURBO METER 00001793 270149 7008223 5917.6530 1,090.13 REMOTE TRANSPONDERS 00001793 270150. .7008854 5917.6530 261.84 TRANSPONDER 00001793 270151 7069214 5917.6530 2,640.88 351141 9/812011 105160 DAKOTA UNLIMITED 245.83 CHAIN.LINK REPAIR 00001886 270471 16342 1318.6406 245.83 361142 91812011 104020 DALCO 223.37 GRILL CLEANER 270400 2364914 5421.6511 128.83 GLASS CLEANER 270401 2367875 5421.6511 151.76 TOWELS 00001454 270402 2368918 1552.6406 76.43- CREDIT 00009178 270526 2366249 5111.6511 159.64 FLOOR SEALER 00002180 270547 2368814 5620.6511 587.17 351143 9/8/2011 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 66.30 270230 614540 5862.5515 1,850.65 270231 614539 5862.5514 44.80 270232 615657 5842.5515 1,660.90 270355 615656 5822.5514 66.30 270356 615655. 5862.5515 Subledger Account Description ADVERTISING OTHER CONCRETE\ COST OF GOODS.- PRO SHOP COST 6F GOODS - PRO SHOP EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 9/712011 9:55:44 Page 7 Business Unit GOLF ADMINISTRATION GENERAL STORM SEWER PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL METER REPAIR METER REPAIR METER REPAIR SNOW & ICE REMOVAL GRILL GRILL CENT SVC PW BUILDING ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT EDINBOROUGH PARK VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING c R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/7/2011 9:55:44 Council Check Register - Page - 8 9/8/2011 -9/812611 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3,738.00 270371 615654 5862.5514 COST. OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,924.03 270578 615658 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 13,350.98 351144 91812011 118490 DEEP ROCK WATER COMPANY _ 131.81 622833 WATER 270548 7276302 5621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 131.81 351145 918/2011 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 54.74 BAKERY 270403 379615 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 139.63 270404 .379635 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 68.42 270405 379794 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 43.61 270406 380081 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 41.38 270407 380236 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 169.01 270408- 380290 5421.5510 _ COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 109.50 270409, 380596 5421.5510 COST OF ...GOODS SOLD GRILL 101.26 270,410 380597 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS.SOLD GRILL 44.21 270411 380909 5421.5510 l COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 771.96 351146 9/8/2011 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 7,324.07 JULY 2011 SURCHARGE 270348 12257053060 1495.4380 SURCHARGE INSPECTIONS 7,324.07 351147 91812011 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC. 123.35 110311867 270549 110311867 -8/11 5621.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 123.35 351146 91812011 123995 DICK'S /LAKEVILLE SANITATION IN ` 2,663.41 REFUSE 270306 1275112 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 3,253.47 REFUSE 270307 1276902 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 5,916.88 c 351149 91812011 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES 295.40 CHLORINE 270152 82701256 -11 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 129.35 CAUSTIC SODA 270412 82701297 -11 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 3,595.82 CHEMICALS 00001840 270413 82701272 -11 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 4,020.57 351150 918/2011 129345.1 DW MOORE STUCCO INC. 6,952.00 STUCCO THE COMPRESSOR BLDG 00008019 270153 081911 5500.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET 6,952.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 917/2011 9:55:44 Council Check Register Page - 9 9/8/2011 -9/812011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 351151 9/812011 124503 EDEN PRAIRIE IMNLECTRIC CO. 70.29 WIRE 00001876 270308 08299400 1646.6578 LAMPS & FIXTURES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 79.64 HUBS 00001860 270414 08296900 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 149.93 351152 9/8/2011 129504 EDINA HIGH SCHOOL 500.00 BRAEMAR_ GOLF AD 270415 2011 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 500.00 351153 9/812011 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 18.64 BATTERY, SILICONE 00005304 270154 69- 046083 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 474.91 END ASSEMBLIES, DRAG LINKS 00005304 270309 69- 046312 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 99.90 BATTERY 00005304 270310 70- 067576 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 16.03- CREDIT 270311 69- 046023 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 37.21 FILTERS 00005304 270416 69- 046533 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 253.74 CONTROL ARMS, BUSHINGS 00005304 270417 69- 046578 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS_ EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 69.92 LINK KITS 00005304 270418 69- 046575 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 179.55 WINDSHIELD WASH FLUID 00005304 270419 1- 3713948 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,117.84 351154 91812011 100756 FEDERAL EXPRESS 75.74 SHIPPING CHARGES 00001745 270312 7 -605 -90595 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 75.74 351155 91812011 129500 FLAT EARTH BREWING CO. 431.89 270579 2686 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 431.89 351156 9/8/2011 101512 FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL COMPANY . 2,110.78 JET HOSE 00001798 270420 14556 5923.6530 REPAIR PARTS COLLECTION SYSTEMS 2,110.78 351157 9/812011 120776 GAGE, NATHALIE 53.41 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 270313 062611 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS - 53.41 351158 9/812011 101931 GEAR FOR SPORTS 515.12 MERCHANDISE 270421 11491521 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 515.12 361169 91812011 129503 GIRON, MAYA R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF. EDINA 917/2011 9:55:44 Council Check: Register Page- 10 9/8/2011 — 9/8/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description -- _ Business Unit 62.00 CLASS REFUND 270349 083011 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 62.00 351160 9/812011 118941 GLOBALSTAR USA 29.05 R -91 PHONE 270550 3265777 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL' 29.05 351161 9/8/2011 120929 GOVCONNECTION INC. 120.04 GRAPHICS CARD 00004363 .27.0155 48164791 421160.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FINANCE EQUIPMENT 120.04 351162 91812011 101103 GRAINGER 146.21 LIGHT BULBS 00002177 270551 9610135205 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 218.39 CIRCUIT BREAKER 00002187 270552 9614338284 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 364.60 351163 9/8/2011 124711 GRANDVIEW ,TIRE & AUTO - CAHILL 54.95 ALIGNMENT 00005401 270422 29240 1553.6180. CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 54.95 351164 91812011 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 493:50 270233 130637 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 342.50 270456 130829 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 836.00 351165 9/8/2011 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 260.85 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 270553 090111 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 260.85' 351166 91812011 - 101360 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 2,614.00 4040 W 70TH ST EDINA OOREPAIR 270156 112942 01367.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT 105.30 IRRIGATION SYSTEM REPAIR 00001882 270423 112860 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE 2,719.30 351167 918/2011 100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT 123.39 FORESTRY SUPPLIES 00005363 270513 100697 1644.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES - TREES &MAINTENANCE 123.39 351168 91812011 102967 HALSTEAD, TODD . 24.98 REIMBURSE FOR PULLEY 270472 090111 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 24.98 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/7/2011 9:55:44 Council Check Register Page - 11 9/8/2011 -9/8/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 351169 91812011 120227 HARTSHORN, BOB 287.43 PICNIC ITEMS 270424 083111 1628.4392.03 SENIOR SOFTBALL SENIOR CITIZENS 680.00 MTKA SENIOR SERVICES, 270424 083111 1628.4392.03 SENIOR SOFTBALL SENIOR CITIZENS 967.43 - 351170 91812011 101209 HEIMARK FOODS / 282.24 MEAT PATTIES 270157 023373 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 282.24 351171 91812011 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 160.31 TECHNICAL SUPPORT 270350 110862023 1190.6105 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 160.31 351172 91812011 .106371 HENNEPIN FACULTY ASSOCIATES 2,475.08._, MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 270351 OB18512 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,475.08 351173 91812011 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY _ . 34.20 SPEAKER BARS 00004361 270158 30518343 -001 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 34.20 351174 91812011 103763 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 130.30 VACUUM HOSE 00002186 270554 7377248 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 98.22 SCRUBBER PARTS 00002189 270555 7377249 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 228.52 - 351175 91812011 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI 865.69 FIELD PAINT 00001721 270514 091841 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 865.69 351176 91812011 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 525.00 r 270234 570759 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,518.50 270580 571386 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,043.50 351177 91812011 105694 INFRATECH 768.25 DEBRIS CATCHER, POLES 00001657 270159 1100449 5920.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SEWER CLEANING 768.25 351178 91812011 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY - 19.84 RATCHETING HARD HAT 00001880 270473 4350331 -01 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 177.38 FUSES, LIGHT FIXTURE 00001880 270473 '' 4350331 -01 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 197.22 351179 9181201.1 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 3.40 4.25 6.82 6.83 10.24 12.80 13.99 16.14 18.18 22.03 49.95 55.07 70.88 72.13 124.87 126.26 133.45 136.61 140.06 163.66 188.46 216.39 ' 351180 918/2011 100830 JERRY'S PRINTING 534.38 BROCHURE 534.38 083111 351181 '91812011 102146 JESSEN PRESS 374.07 TIME CARDS 374.07 GENERAL SUPPLIES I 351182 91812011 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 10.00 GENERAL SUPPLIES 390.00 083111 85.25 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,491.43 083111 10,086.65 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/8/2011 -918/2011 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 270425 083111 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 270425 083111 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 270425 083111 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 270425 083111 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 270425 083111 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 270425 083111 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 270425 083111 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 270425 083111 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 270425 083111 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 270425 083111 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 270425 083111 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 270425 083111 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 270425 083111 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS 270425 083111 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 270425 .083111 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 270425 083111 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 270425 083111 5431.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 270425 083111 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 270425 083111 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 270425 083111 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 270425 083111 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 270425 083111 1301.6556 TOOLS 270425 083111 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 00006348 270426 54597 5410.6575 PRINTING 270314 29164 1550.6575 270160 1610338 5421.5514 270161 1622209 5421.5514 270162 1585254 5430.5514 270235 1596548 5822.5514 270357 1596592 5862.5514 PRINTING 917/2011 9:55:44 Page,. 12 CITY HALL GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH STREET GENERAL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS LIQUOR YORK GENERAL CENT'SVC PW BUILDING ENGINEERING GENERAL VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GRANDVIEW MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE POOL OPERATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION EDINBOROUGH PARK GENERAL MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD. BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER SOTH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 917/2011 9:55:44 Council Check Register Page - 13 9/8/2011 -9/8/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description . ' Business Unit 3,545.32 270358 1596591 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING " 62.85- 270457 1589689 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 116.90 270581 1619601 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 42.70- 270582 116108 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 17,272.64 270583 1619600 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 33,892.64 351183 91812011 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 194.61 GREENHOUSE SUPPLIES 00001732 270315 59026876 1643.6546 WEED SPRAY GENERAL TURF CARE 194.61 351185 91812011 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 494.30 270236 1122693 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 953.90 270237 1122691 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 11.69 270238 1122690 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 319.77 270239 1122689 / 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,299.64 270240 1122692 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS $ SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 923.84 270241 1122686 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 165.50 270242 1123076 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 48.12 270243 1117319 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 445.57 270244 1122687 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 445.85 270245 1122688 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 48.12 270247 1117320 5862.5512 COST OF.GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5,364.96 270476 1127273 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING ' 380.60 270477 1127272 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 107.99 270478 1127258 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,677.88 270479 1127271 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,512.36 270480 1127270 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,186.48 270481 1127274 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,982.33 270584 1127261 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.12 270585 1127260 58415513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING .37 270586 1127257 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 7,203.22 270587 1127266 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,124.43 270588 1127269 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 801.07 270589 1127256 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 121.12 270590 1127254 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 48.12 270591 1117316 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 35.37 270592 1127267 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 44.22 270593 1127262 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,817.18 270594 1127264 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,265.96 270595 1127265 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 9!7/2011 9:55:44 Council Check Register Page - 14 9/8/2011 -918/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 692.34 270596 1127263 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,476.10 270597 1127268 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 34,999.52 351186 91812011 129501 JOHNSON, MEREDITH 1,253.38 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 270316 083111 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,253.38 351187 91812011 120296 KAASA, GUNNAR ` 47.00 UNIFORM PURCHASE 270427 083111 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 47.00 351188 91812011 102080 KATTREH, ANN 363.23 NRPA TRAINING EXPENSES 270556 090211 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 363.23 351189 :91812011 129405 KEY ELECTRIC LLC 535.00 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 270557 082311 -04 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 535.00 351190 91812011 118660 LAKES AREA HOME IMPROVEMENT SE c 161.00 REPAIR LAWN FAUCET 27.0163 1301S 05515.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION OSCAR ROBERTS RECON 161.00 - 351191 91812011 100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 234.50 LOGO CLOTHING 00004000 270558 10558700 1513.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 234.50 351192 9/812011 127146 LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES INC. 677.59 PLAYGROUND REPAIR PARTS 00001711 270515 M89459 1647.6530 REPAIR PARTS PATHS & HARD SURFACE 677.59 351193 9/812011 101220 LAND EQUIPMENT INC. 5679 FILTERS ELEMENT 00002345 270527 231348 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 56.79 351194 91812011 96.05 46.44 389.08 531.57 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. DRILL 00005335 270428 9300053511 1553.6556 FUSE HOLDERS 00005329 270429 9300031244 1553.6530 SCRESS, RIVETS, WASHERS 00005335 270430 9300049100 1553.6530 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 917/2011 9:55:44 Council Check Register Page - 15 918/2011 -9/812011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 351195 918/2011 124810 LIFT BRIDGE BEER COMPANY 80.00 270248 11784 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 80.00 351196 91812011 101792 LUBE -TECH 72.68 ENGINE ANALYSIS 00005350 270431 1947445 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 82.85 STEEL DRUMS 00005349 270432 1948045 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN y 155.53 - 351197 91812011 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,510.11 270317 115555 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,510.11 351198 9/812011 118226 MAGIC BOUNCE PARTY RENTALS 268.19 JUMPER RENTAL 270559 6724 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 268.19 351199 918/2011 101146 MATRIX 272.91 270318 607849573 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 272.91 - 351200 91812011 100875 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC. 412.54 PLANTS 00002190 270560 52430 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK 412.54 351201 91812011 101457 MEICHSNER, EARL 145.97 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 270516 083011 1652.6107. MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE WEED MOWING 145.97 351202 91812011 101483 MENARDS 27.77 FURNITURE DOLLY 00008012 270164 22215 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 72.04 SWIVEL CASTERS 00001726 270319 25195 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 91.43 TRAILER WHEELS 00001772 270433. 25797 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH &FRANCE MAINTENANCE 191.24 351203 9/812011 124204 METSA, PAUL 300.00 TALENT FEE 270434 083011 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 300.00 351204 91812011 102873 MILLER, SUSAN 150.00 REIMBURSE FOR ENTERTAINMENT 270561 090111 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 917/2011 9:55:44 Council Check Register Page - 16 9/812011 -9/8/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 351205 91812011 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 3,675.00 INSTALL COPPER TO NEW STOPBOX 270165 33912 05485.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WM -485 GOLF TERRACE N'HOOD 1,225.00 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00001797 270435 33919 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 4,900.00 351206 91812011 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 33.25 CO2 CYLINDER 270436 3003696 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 33.25 351207 91812011 117724 MINNEAPOLIS /ST PAUL BUSINESS J 184.00 SUBSCRIPTION 270533 1703817 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 'ADMINISTRATION 184.00 351208 918/2011 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 849.66 EMULSION 00005433 270437 63490 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 849.66 351209 91812011 117837 MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSOCIAT 250.00 SESSION REGISTRATION 270438 082911 1280.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 250.00 351210 .91812011 108668 MORRIS, GRAYLYN 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 9/15/11 270538 090111 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION 150.00 351211 91812011 105314 NAGC 120.00 MEMBERSHIP 270320 082311 2210.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS 120.00 351212 91812011 106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS 1,658.64 PLASTICWARE FOR RESALE 270562 134246 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 1;658.64 351213 91812011 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC 353.16 LIGHT BAR 00005359 270321 28319 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 386.08 STROBE TUBES 00005362 270322 28352 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 146.42 FLASHLIGHTS 00003613 270563 23802 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 885.66 i 351214 91812011 116114 OCE 65.25 JULY USAGE 270166 987524767 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING - R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/812011 -9/812011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 65.25 147.65 - 351215 91812011 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 106083 ON. SITE SANITATION INC. 26.67 FLASH CARD 00008004 270167 574455010001 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 34.02 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00008018 270168 574454647001 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 29.87 OFFICE SUPPLIES 270439 1377736124 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1.64 BOXES 270440 1373635267 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 55.45 OFFICE SUPPLIES 270564 574963821001 5621.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE AMBULANCE FEES COST OF GOOD &SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD 9/7/2011 9:55:44 Page - 17 Business Unit C ARENA ADMINISTRATION ARENA ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION RICHARDS GOLF COURSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS TREES & MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING GRILL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE VERNON SELLING GRILL GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 147.65 351216 9/812011 106083 ON. SITE SANITATION INC. 53.44 TOILET.SERVICE 270441 A -431235 5430.6182 106.88 270442 A- 431236 5422.6182 160.32 351217 918/2011 124519 OVERHOLT, JAMES 365.19 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT. 270.517 - 083111 1644.6107 365.19 351218 91812011 129502 PARKER, - NAKEISHA 349.01 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 270323 083011 1470.4329 349.01 351219 9/812011 100347. PAUSTIS & SONS 56.25 270250 8316573 -IN 5862.5513 3125 270359 8317385 -IN 5862.5515 3,404.78 270482 8317381 -IN 5862.5513 3,404.28 270598 .,83173624N 5842.5513 6,898.56 351220 9/812011 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 499.50 270169 71405841 5421.5510 343.48 270170 71405859 5430.5510 422.00 270360 65655501 5862.5515 1,285.20 270443 71966002 5421.5510 2,550.18 351221 91812011 122417 PETTY CASH 10.30 PETTY CASH 270518 090211 7411.6406 13.25 PETTY CASH 270518 090211 7412.6406 26.00 PETTY CASH 270518 090211 7411.6406 49.55 RUBBISH REMOVAL RUBBISH REMOVAL MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE AMBULANCE FEES COST OF GOOD &SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD 9/7/2011 9:55:44 Page - 17 Business Unit C ARENA ADMINISTRATION ARENA ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION RICHARDS GOLF COURSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS TREES & MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING GRILL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE VERNON SELLING GRILL GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR CITY OF EDINA 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING Council Check Register VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD. WINE VERNON SELLING 9/8/2011 -9/8/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 351222 91812011 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 302.48 270251 2115549 5822.5513 216.16 270252 2115548 5822.5513. 111.77 270253 2115547 5822.5512 106.24 270254 2115542 5822.5513 1.12 270255 2115541 5822.5512 291.20 270256 2116121 5862.5513- 607.24 270483 2118820 5862.5512 348.25 270484 2118811 5862.5513 1,157.84 270485 2118821 5862.5513 623.83 270486 2118819 5862.5513 1,866.25 270599 2118810 5842.5513 43.07 270600 2118818 5842.5515 2,277.48 270601 2118814 5842.5513 452.70 270602 2118817 5842.5513 .37 270603 2118809 5842.5512 1,895.41 270604 2118816 5842.5512 356.43 270605 2118012 5822.5512 10,657.84 351223 91812011 124176 PINNACLE DISTRIBUTING 73.60 270606 13352 5842.5515 238.80 270607 13353 5842.5515 312.40 351224 91812011 106071. PLAYWORKS.GROUP 4.88 DAILY ADMISSION REFUND 270171 082911 5300.2039 67.12 DAILY ADMISSION REFUND 270171 082911 5301.4541 72.00 351225 91812011 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 319.04 i TIRES 00005305 270324 665424 1553.6583 293.91 TIRES 00005305 270325 665406 1553.6583 612.95 351226 91812011 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 655.10 LINERS, TOWELS, TISSSUE 00002366 270326 5293 5630.6511 723.04 TISSUE, LINERS; SOAP _ 00002171 270565 5277 5620.6511 1,378.14 351227: . 91812011 i 100971 QUALITY WINE 9m2011 9:55:44 Page - 18 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF. GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD. WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF'GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE GENERAL ADMISSIONS TIRES & TUBES TIRES & TUBES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES YORK SELLING YORK SELLING AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES EDINBOROUGH PARK Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS'SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 9/7/2011 9:55:44 Page - 19 Business Unit YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING CONTRACTED REPAIRS__ CENTENNIAL LAKES COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK REPAIR PARTS - EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD. GRILL GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES GENERAL STORM SEWER CONSULTING INSPECTION SS-461 RIDGE RD RECONSTRUCTION CONSULTING INSPECTION WM -510 RIDGE RD RECONSTRUCTION CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 9/8/2011 -9/8/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 11.35- 270257 492474-00 5842.5512 1,591.41 270361 501652 -00 5862.5512 1,852.88 270362 501659 -00 5842.5512 1,505.00 270363 501651 -00 5842.5512 269.80 270364 501778 -00 5842.5513 18.60 270365 501779 -CO 5842.5513 96.90 270458 501660 -00 5822.5512 192.20 270459 501479 -00 5822.5513 048.00 270487 501780 -00 5862.5513 635.73 270488 501477 -00 5862.5513 4,264.00 270489 501476-00 5862.5513 1,312.00 270.490 501418 -00 5862.5513 656.00 270491 501417 -00 5842.5513 4,001.60 270492 501474 -00 5842.5513 641.60 270608 501475 -00 5842.5513 17,874.37 351228 91812011 105324 READY WATT ELECTRIC 199.00 REPAIRS TO FOUNTAIN PUMP 00002370 270528 95864 5630.6180 199.00 - 351229 91812011 126343 RICHFIELD DQ GRILL AND CHILL 35.98 CAKES 270566 566 5620.5510 -35.98 351230 9/812011 100985 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO 155.39 WASHDOWN PUMP 00005360 270172 C58822 1553.6530 853.60 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 00001883 270444 7835 1301.6180 1,008.99 351231 918/2011 101634 SAINT AGNES_ BAKING COMPANY 47.26 BAKERY 270173 320703 5421.5510 47.26 351232 9/812011 107431 SCAN AIR FILTER INC. 701.40 FILTERS 270352 118434 1551.6406 701.40 351233 91812011 100995 SEH - 1,942.00 CITYWORKS SERVICES 270174 247209 5932.6010 677.62 RIDGE ROAD RECONST 270175 247134 03461.1705.21 1,129.35 RIDGE ROAD RECONST 270175 247134 05510.1705.21 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS'SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 9/7/2011 9:55:44 Page - 19 Business Unit YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING CONTRACTED REPAIRS__ CENTENNIAL LAKES COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK REPAIR PARTS - EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD. GRILL GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL SALARIES REGULAR EMPLOYEES GENERAL STORM SEWER CONSULTING INSPECTION SS-461 RIDGE RD RECONSTRUCTION CONSULTING INSPECTION WM -510 RIDGE RD RECONSTRUCTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/7/2011 9:55:44 Council Check Register- Page - 20 9/8/2011 - 9/8/2011. Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 7,679.59 RIDGE ROAD RECONST 270175 247134 01384.1705.21 - CONSULTING-INSPECTION RIDGE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION 13,100.48 RIDGE ROAD RECONST 270175 247134 04374.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION STS -374 RIDGE ROAD 13,777.61 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECONST 270176 247135 63460.1705. 21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 14,628.74 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECONST 270176 247135 04375.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 29,456.96 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECONST 270176 247135 05511:1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 30,055.41 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECONST 270176 247135 01334.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -334 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 112,447.76 351234 .91812011 120292 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS 444.60 EMBROIDERED CLOTHING 270519 416770 7410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 444.60 351235 91812011 103689 SNAP -ON TOOLS 1,014.24 , MODIS UPGRADE 00005435. 270445 214111208 -19856 1553.6160 DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2 1,014.24 351236 91812011 102935 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION INC 220.00 COOLER REPAIR 00006340 270446 19874 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL 220.00 - 351237 .91812011 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 99.40 270258 1495442 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 193.00 270259. 1594108 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE SOTH ST SELLING 157.00 270460 1489823 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 139.45 270461 1495448 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 622.50 270462 1608933 5622.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 338.45 270493 1495450 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 40.62 270494 1495451 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS'SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 568.00 270495 1608932 .5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 563.00 270496 1489825. 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 368.00 270609 1608936 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,046.00 270610 1589942 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 731.00 270611 1489824 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 58.95 270612 1495449 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD.LI000R YORK SELLING 4,925.37 351238 918/2011 - 101004 SPS COMPANIES 8.97 PLUMBING REPAIR PARTS: 00001881 270520 'S2421608.001 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 8.97 351239 91812011 102251 ST. ANDREWS PRODUCTS CO f 9/7/2011 9:55:44' Page- 21 Business Unit GOLF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION ARENA ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION VERNON SELLING BOTH ST SELLING YORK SELLING ES /CL BALANCE SHEET 463.00 270366 JM7373 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 270613 CITY OF EDINA 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,435.00 Council Check Register 351245 91812011 9/8/2011 - 9/8/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5421.6102 335.65 COURSE BALL MARKERS 270447 0000653384 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 335.65 361246 91812011 101027 TARGET BANK 351240 9/8/2011 100650 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC 57.98 X- XXX -XX9 -840 SUPPLIES 270185 081811 31.10 DOOR KEYS 00001710 270327 CH- 562200 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 31.10 361247 91812011 104932 TAYLOR MADE 351241 918/2011 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 244.40 SUBSCRIPTION 270567 1808753 -8111 5621.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 244.40 351242 91812011 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 260.00 . BRAEMAR ICE ARENA AD 00008017 270177 1333247 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 31.46 PUBLISH COMCAST NOTICE 270178 1333199 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 51.48 PUBLISH ORD 2011 -14 270179 1333197 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 42.90 PUBLISH NOTICE 270180 1333198 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 40.04 PUBLISH NOTICE 270181 1334406 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 34.32 PUBLISH NOTICE 270182 1334407 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 102.96 AD FOR BID 270183 1334408 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL 266.66 EDINA LIQUOR AD 270328 1334481 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 266.67 EDINA LIQUOR AD 270328 1334481 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 266.67 EDINA LIQUOR AD 270328 1334481 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER =' 1,363.16 351243 91812011 105386 SUPERIOR IRON INC. 2,250.00 CONCESSION DECK 270568 28389 5600.1720 BUILDINGS 2,250.00 351244 9/8/2011 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 9/7/2011 9:55:44' Page- 21 Business Unit GOLF ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION ARENA ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION VERNON SELLING BOTH ST SELLING YORK SELLING ES /CL BALANCE SHEET 463.00 270366 JM7373 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 972.00 270613 JM7372 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,435.00 351245 91812011 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 38.00 BEER LINE CLEANING 270184 392318 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 38.00 361246 91812011 101027 TARGET BANK 57.98 X- XXX -XX9 -840 SUPPLIES 270185 081811 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 57.98 361247 91812011 104932 TAYLOR MADE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/7/2011 9:55:44 .. Council Check Register Page - 22 9/8/2011 -918/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 404.96 MERCHANDISE 270448 16355892 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 359.33 IRONS 270449 16385375 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 764.29 351248 91812011 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 189.00 270186 00770777 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 562.80 270187 653512 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL i 130.75 270367 654208 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING - 3,119.30 270368 654207 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER "VERNON SELLING 4,001.85 351249 918/2011 123129 TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL 231.25 DRAFT MEETING 8/16/11 270529 M18593 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 231.25 351250 91812611 103277 TITAN MACHINERY 46.36 CAP, HOSE ` 00005395 270188 9001470 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 46.36 - 361251 !.91812011 124124 TMAX GEAR - 129.99 GOLF BAGS 270450 654054 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 129.99 351252 91812011 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 128.12 CUTTING TORCH SUPPLIES 00008013 270189. 361768 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 128.12 351253 .91812011 101042 TRIARCO 76.42 ART SUPPLIES 00009186 270530 433636 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 76.42 351254 91812011 100682 TRUGREEN - MTKA 5640 144.29 WEED CONTROL 00001829 270521 068255 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 112.22 WEED CONTROL 00001828 270522 068258 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE i 256.51: . 351255 91812011 124597 . TUORILA; SHERYL 550.06 INSTRUCTOR AC 270353 082411 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 550.00 351256 91812011 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL _ HEALT a, 74.80 FITNESS FOR DUTY EXAM 270451 101823055 1400.6175 PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/7/2011 9:55:44 Council Check Register Page - 23 9/8/2011 - 918/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 74.80 351257 918/2011 106188 TWIN CITIES TRANSPORT & RECOVE 250.00 TRUCKS FOR TRAINING 270569 375240 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 250.00 270570 375241 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 250.00 270571 375242 1470.6104 CONFERENCES &.SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT: GENERAL 250.00 270572 375243 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,000.00 351258 91812011 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 160.31 GRASS SEED 00001602 270329 25992 1643.6547 SEED - GENERAL TURF CARE 160.31 351259 9/8/2011 101053 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 107.57 LIGHT INSULATION SUPPLIES 00001769 270523 445786 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 107.57 351260 9/812011 103298 UPS STORE 01715, THE 10.73 SHIP SAMPLES 00001788 270190 TRAN: 1330 5915.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER TREATMENT 10.73 351261 9/8/2011 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 323.11 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 270573 208854 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 323.11 351262 918/2011 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 1,500.00 CART RENTAL 270452 56921 5423.6216 LEASE LINES GOLF CARS 1,500.00 351263 91812011 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 102.27 WIPERS, NYLON GLOVES 00001609 270330 278582 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 102.27 351264 918/2011 125327 VINOANDES 190.10 270497 WEB000294 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 190.10 351265 9/812011 119454 VINOCOPIA 54.46 270498 0043794 -IN 5662.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 82.50 270499 0043793 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 136.96 R55CKREG LOG20000 J 270260 374542 5822.5513 CITY OF EDINA 50TH ST SELLING 5,246.55 270501 375420 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Council Check Register 97.12 270615 375418 5842.5513' COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING - 9/8/2011 - 9/8/2011 270616 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 351266 91812011 104820 VOELKER, JAMES 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 19.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 270331 083011 1553.6201 LAUNDRY VERNON SELLING 1,145.42 19.99 619371 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 351267 91812011 840043 101078 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 75.29 270369 622639 151.66 NOZZLES 00005436 270453 0043428 -IN 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 622639 5862.5512 151.66 VERNON SELLING 6,596.14 270370 622647 351268 91812011 YORK SELLING 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 270463 622646 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 853.20 270464 270500 278319 -00 5862.5513 COST OF'GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 9,296.92 1,129.45 622642 270614 278199 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,630.50 270503 1,982.65 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR. VERNON SELLING 10,564.76 351269 .9/812011 5862.5512 101312 WINE MERCHANTS VERNON SELLING 683.95 270617 9612011 9:55:44 Page - 24 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 921.02 J 270260 374542 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD;WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5,246.55 270501 375420 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 97.12 270615 375418 5842.5513' COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING - 831.35 270616 375419 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7,096.04 . 351270 9/8/2011 124291 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 2,480.74 270261 621065 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,145.42 270262 619371 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 224.15- 270263 840043 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 75.29 270369 622639 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,185.97 270369 622639 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 6,596.14 270370 622647 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,017.03 270463 622646 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,761.32 270464 622644 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 9,296.92 270502 622642 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,630.50 270503 622641 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR. VERNON SELLING 10,564.76 270504 622640 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 683.95 270617 623571 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,229.70 270618 624495 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,630.22 270619 622650 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 16,482.09 270620 622649 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD'LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,606.39 270621 622648 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 59.64 270622 839443 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 66,102.65 351271 11812011 124529 WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 620.50 270191 793159 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 917/2011 9:55:44 :- Council Check Register Page - 25 9/8/2011 -9/812011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,095.30 270192 790127 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 146.30 270193 793124 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 1,371.00 270264 793576 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 64.50 270265 794344 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 59.40 270266 794343 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,448.53 270267 793377 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,132.50 270268 793749 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,645.00 270623 796382 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 135.00 270624 796379 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,624.35 270625 794342 5642.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,970.00 270626 793351 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 19,312.38 351273 91812011 101726 XCEL ENERGY 56.18 51- 4420190 -3 270194 293847574 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 9,204.82 51- 9603061 -0 270195 293939766 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 80.31 51- 9770164 -7 270196 293948063 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 19.37 51- 9770163 -6 270197 293945766 1321.6185 LIGHT &POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 1,206.03 51- 6223269 -1 270198 293883380 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 219.33 51- 4621797 -2 270199 293857179 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 40.85 51- 8997917 -7 270200 293931464 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 89.47 51- 8526048 -8 270.201 293921224 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 332.69 51- 8324712 -5 270202 293919844 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 39.75 51- 6892224 -5 270203 293896791 1321.6185 _ LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 15.99 51- 6541084 -2 270204 293890003 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 259.25 51- 9251919 -0 270205 293945777 5650.6185 LIGHT & POWER PROMENADE 1,781.99 51- 5107681 -4 - 270206 293859347 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 41.09 51- 9422326-6 270207 294114591 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 154.00 51- 9337452 -8 270208 294101832 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 176.46 51- 8987646 -8 270209 294090653 1321.6185 LIGHT &POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 51.36 51- 8976004 -9 270210 294091145 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 62.64 51- 6692497 -0 270211 294059286 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 3,127.06 51- 5547446 -1 270212 294210813 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 1,851.48 51- 9011854 -4 270213 293929085 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 81.24 51- 9608462 -5 270214 294104054 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 9.95 51- 60501842 270215 293882454 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 5,735.75 51- 4827232 -6 270332 294378077 5311.6185 LIGHT &POWER POOL OPERATION 639.50 51- 6046826 -0 270333 294600136 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 171.44 51- 6229265 -9 270334 294577039 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 2,285.23 51- 6229265 -9 270334 294577039 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 35.44 51- 8102668 -0 270335 294438486 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR R55CKREG LOG20000 222.31 CITY OF EDINA 351275 91812011 Council Check Register 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 9/8/2011 — 9/8/2011 UNLEADED FUEL 00001200 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 156.05 51- 5938955 -6 270336 294573515 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER 32,106.20 51- 4621797 -2 270337 294374309 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 1,333.18 51- 5634814 -2 270372 294567883 5934.6185 LIGHT &POWER 1,989.70 51- 9013604 -6 270373 294767589 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER 31.45 51- 4151897 -6 270374 294697205 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER 10,921.11 51- 6955679 -8 270375 294745875 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER 34.24 51- 7567037 -0 270376 294750649 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 5,379.80 514966303 -6 270377 294559980 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER 2,702.39 51- 4159265 -8 270524 293844389 7411.6185 ,_ LIGHT & POWER 82,422.79 083111 100.00 351274 91812011 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 673,231.49 Grand Total 38.23 AUG USAGE - BLDG/ENG 00004322 270531 056924728 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 184.08 AUG USAGE - PARK & REC 00004322 270532 056924729 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 1553.6581 GASOLINE 1553.6581 GASOLINE 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 9/712011 9:55:44 Page - 26 Business Unit AQUATIC WEEDS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STORM LIFT STATION MAINT DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE CITY HALL GENERAL STREET LIGHTING REGULAR TRAFFIC SIGNALS PSTF OCCUPANCY CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER. EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 673,231.49 Total Payments 673,231.49 0 222.31 351275 91812011 119647 YOCUM OIL COMPANY INC. 20,271.23 UNLEADED FUEL 00001200 270216 450702. 9,813.00 DIESEL FUEL 00001200 270454 450371 30,084.23 351276 91812011 120099 _Z WINES USA LLC 70.50 270627 10471 70.50 351277 91812011 101091 ZIEGLER INC 80.22 HYDRAULIC HOSE BUILD 00005364 270455 PCO01313534 80.22 351278 91812011 101386 ZUHRAH SHRINE CONCERT BAND 100.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 9/11/11 270537 083111 100.00 673,231.49 Grand Total 1553.6581 GASOLINE 1553.6581 GASOLINE 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 9/712011 9:55:44 Page - 26 Business Unit AQUATIC WEEDS STREET LIGHTING REGULAR STORM LIFT STATION MAINT DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE CITY HALL GENERAL STREET LIGHTING REGULAR TRAFFIC SIGNALS PSTF OCCUPANCY CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER. EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 673,231.49 Total Payments 673,231.49 0 R55CKSUM LOG20000 _ Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 227,899.86 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 316.41 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 19,032.72 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 120.04 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 30,055.41 05100 ART CENTER FUND 2,440.01 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 1,206.03 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 6,670.81 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 16,708.35 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 7,603.96 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 13,467.72 05800 LIQUOR FUND 241,214.01 05900 UTILITY FUND 68,114.08 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 34,899.25 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 3,482.83 Report Totals 673,231.49 L CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 9/812011 - 9/8/2011 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing polici s fnd procedures date v t 91712011 9:56:36 Page - 1 I-- 9/1412011 7:47:36 Page- 1 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT ART - CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT PONDS & LAKES _ 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL RECYCLING GRILL PSTF OCCUPANCY INSPECTIONS TRAFFIC SIGNALS 40.80 270709 CITY OF EDINA 5822.5515 R55CKREG LOG20000 61.20 270710 0726459 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD•WIX Council Check Register 270845 0815406 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 919/2011 - 9/15/2011 68.80 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 351279 9/912011 .271026 100919 JOHNSON, NAOMI 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 305.60 5.07 PETTY CASH 268812 081011 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 351282 911512011 25.35 PETTY CASH 268812 081011 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 28.56 PETTY CASH 268812 081011 5111.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS 177.73 PETTY CASH 268812 081011 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 220.91 PETTY CASH 268812 081011 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 457.62 38,820.60 RECYCLING 351280 911512011 5952.6183 101971 ABLE HOSE & RUBBER INC. 38,820.60 823.37 HOSE 00001795 270628 1- 833804 5933.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 911612011 823.37 351281• 911512011 1,093.86 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 270805 1612486 5421.5510 9/1412011 7:47:36 Page- 1 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT ART - CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT PONDS & LAKES _ 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL RECYCLING GRILL PSTF OCCUPANCY INSPECTIONS TRAFFIC SIGNALS 40.80 270709 0726460 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 61.20 270710 0726459 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD•WIX 74.80 270845 0815406 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 68.80 _ 271025 0726461 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 60.00 .271026 0815408 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 305.60 351282 911512011 119813 AERIAL PAINTING INC. 1,600:00 LIGHT POLE PAINTING 00001892 270793 090211 .1322.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,600.00 351283 9115/2011 100058 - ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 38,820.60 RECYCLING 270940 2638693 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES 38,820.60 351284 911612011 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 1,093.86 FOOD 270805 1612486 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,093.86 351285 911512011 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 206.66 270941 SEPT12011 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 206.66 351286 911512011 102817 ASSOCIATED BAG COMPANY 644.68 POLY BAGS 270629 Y895591 1495.6406 GENERAL,SUPPLIES 644.68 351287 9/1512011 122948 ATSI 585.00 CALIBRATION SERVICE 00001741 270794 INVIO10525 1330.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 9/1412011 7:47:36 Page- 1 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT ART - CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT PONDS & LAKES _ 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL RECYCLING GRILL PSTF OCCUPANCY INSPECTIONS TRAFFIC SIGNALS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 911412011 7:47:36 Council Check Register Page - 2 919/2011 -9/15/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger- Account Description Business Unit 585.00 351288 911512011 120995 AVR INC. 728.89 READY MIX 00001838 270630 52095 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 934.09 270631 51917 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,560.38 270632 51998 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 3,223.36 351289 911512011 129512 BAERTSCHI, PAUL 145.00 POLICE BRIEFS - LEGAL UPDATES 270942 082511 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 145.00 351290 911512011 100642 BANNERS TO GO .129.33 PARK SIGNS 00001837 270943 32599 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 129:33 351291 9115/2011 121083 BARR, FRANK 48.75 • ART WORK SOLD 270914, 083111 5101.4413 ARTWORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 48.75 351292 911512011 124039 BARTLETT TREE EXPERTS 1,489.03 ELM TREE TREATMENTS 270668 32468470 -0 5431.6251 SHARED MAINTENANCE RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 2,177.47 270669 32468469 -0 5422.6275 COURSE BEAUTIFICATION MAINT OF.COURSE & GROUNDS 3,666.50 351293 9115/2011 124494 BECC CORP -_ 634.19 TRANSDUCER 00001782 270987 943 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT ' 634.19 361294 911512011 129513 BECKMAN, DEBRA 954.97 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 270944 090811 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES . FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 954.97 351295 911512011 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 1,193.75 270711 59862700 5842.5512 COST.OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 271.25 270712 59866400 58215513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 72.91 270713 85674100 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX. 50TH ST SELLING 188.89 270714 85701500 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX - YORK SELLING - 39.03- 270715 85672700REV 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 415.60 271027 .?59947700 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 675.35 271028 .59943100 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS.SOI-b LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 20.50 271029 59943200 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING . R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2011 7:47:36 _ Council Check Register Page - 3 9/912011 - 9/15/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 165.89 271030 85729700 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 248.65 271031 6108000' 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,213.76 _ 351296 911512011 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. - 591.76 LAWN CARE 270945 137956 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY 591.76 361297 9115/2011 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 91.65 ART WORK SOLD 270915 083111 5101.4413 _ ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 91.65 351298 911512011 125139 BERNICK'S WINE 780.00 270716 32249 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 780.00 351299 9/1512011 101296 BERTRAND, MIKE 87.68 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 270806 090711 5430.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 87.68 351300 9/15/2011 120510 BLOOMINGTON CUSTOM EMBROIDERY _ 95.86 CSO POLOS 270946 30425 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 230.90 UNIFORM SWEATERS 270947 30435 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 326.76 - 351301 9/1512011 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 63.56 OFFICE SUPPLIES 270633 70532 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 63.56 361302 911612011 11936.1 .BOURGETIMPORTS 620.00 270717 104759 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 620.00 - 351303 911512011 102813 BOWMAN, ROBERT - 22.75 ART WORK SOLD 270916 083111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 22.75 351304 911512011 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 7,909.00 MATERIALS TESTING 270634 .*337833 - 01367.1705.21.:, -. CONSULTING. INSPECTION BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT 7.909.00 351305 9/1512011 1251165 BRAUN, MICHAEL R55CKREG LOG20000 46.60 CITY OF EDINA 958260 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING Council Check Register 536.15 270719 958265 919/2011 -9115/2011 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 963271 180.00 CENTENNIAL LAKES PHOTOS 271014 1082 2210.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES 6,625.00 180.00 351306 9/15/2011 106484 BRINDLE, MARY 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 48.00 REIMBURSE FOR SLUC MEETING 270807 090811 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 48.00 270720 91182 351307 911512011 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 525.00 9114/2011 7:47:36 Page- 4 Business Unit COMMUNICATIONS ADMINISTRATION 46.60 270718 958260 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 536.15 270719 958265 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 6,042.25 271032 963271 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 6,625.00 351308 9115/2011 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 525.00 270720 91182 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 525.00 351309 9/15/2011 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. 79.56 CONCRETE 00001799 270988 1264210 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 79.56 351310 911512011 123898 CENTURYLINK 57.68 952 926 -0092 270670 0092 -9/11 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 83.52 952 941 -1019 270671 1019 -8111 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 121.85 952 926 -0419 270672 0419 -9/11 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 55.97 270673 0146 -8/11 5911.6188 TELEPHONE WELL PUMPS 58.67 270673 0146 -8/11 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 117.42 270673 0146 -8/11 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 120.41 270673 0146 -8/11 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 139.96 270673 0146 -8/11 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 166.20 270673 0146 -8/11 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 228.61 270673 0146-8/11 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 235.07 270673 0146 -8/11 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 266.74 270673 0146 -8/11 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 2,059.78 270673 0146 -8/11 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 18.69 651 281- 1355B001311 270769 1311 -9/11 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 40.30 952 922 -9246 270948 9246 -8/11 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 307.80 952 826 -7398 271065 7398 -8111 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 4,078.67 351311 911612011 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 551.05 COOLING TOWER BLEED VALVE 00008028 270770 516648 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT CITY OF EDINA 9114/2011 7:47:36 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 5 9/912011 - 9/15/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 551.05 ^ 351312 9/15/2011 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 99.00 270846 453478 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 99.00 351313 911512011 129517 CITY OF EDINA - PUBLIC WORKS 350.00 PARKING LOT SWEEPING 270989 1059 .1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 350.00 • 351314 9/1512011 114548 CIZEK, DARIN 117.48 UNIFORM PURCHASE 270949 090311 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 117.48 _ 351316 9/1512011 101119 COCKRIEL, VINCE 47.18 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 270950 090911 1600.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 47.18 351316 9115/2011 101345 COLOURS 2,605.00 WELCOME FOLDER DESIGN 271015 10271 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 6,323.79 FOLDER PRINTING 271015 10271 2210.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 8,928.79 361317 911512011 120433 COMCAST 82.60 8772 10 614 0164959 270808 164959 -8/11 5430.6188 TELEPHONE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 59.00 8772 10 614 0199138 270809 199138 -8/11 5422.6188 TELEPHONE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 88.28 8772 10 614 0177449 270810 177449 -8/11 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 74.95 8772 10 614 0165667 270811 165667 -8/11 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 304.83 351318 9115/2011 120826 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT 723.31 CABLE-TV ADVERTISING 270771 8/2011 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ` VERNON SELLING 723.32 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 270771 8/2011 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 723.32 CABLE TV ADVERTISING 270771 8/2011 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER - YORK SELLING 6.59 BRAEMAR GOLF AD 270812 367590 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF. ADMINISTRATION 2,176.54 361319 911512011 129426 COMMUNITY INVESTMENT PARTNERS 279.25 MANAGEMENT FEE 270674 ACCT 52 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 279.25 361320 9116/2011 101948 COUNTRY CLUB TURF R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9114/2011 7:47:36 Council Check Register Page - 6 9/9/2011 - 9/1512011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger.,Account Description Business Unit 871.03 SOD 00002371 270813 2026 5630.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES " 871.03 351321 911512011 123663 CROSSTOWN CONCRETE 2,330.00 REPLACE.SIDEWALK 00001658 270635 082511 5932.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL STORM SEWER 2,330.00 361322 9116/2011 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER _ 20.48 114 - 09855685 -4 270951 063111 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 20.48 351323 911512011 124335 CUMELLA, COLLETTE 6.47 ART WORK SOLD 270917 083111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 6.47 . 351324 911512011. 121655 CURA, SARA 19.50 ART WORK SOLD _ 270918 090111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 19.50 . 351325 911512011 104020 DALCO 147.49 RESTROOM CLEANER 00008026 270772 2370409 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 307.80 . TOWELS, MOPS 00008022 270773 2369013 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 455.29 - 351326 911512011 102285 DAVANNIS 148.00 FOOD FOR TRAINING 270952 208421 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS : POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 148.00 351327 9116/2011 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING CO. 22.40 270847 616561 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST. SELLING 587.50 270848 616560 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST. SELLING 3,530.50 270849 616558 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 66.30 270850 616559 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,718.00 270851 616562 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 7,924.70 351328 9115/2011 122135 DENFELD, SCOTT 70.81 AV SUPPLIES 270675 083111 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 70.81 _. 351329 911512011 '100720 DENNYS 6TH AVE. BAKERY - 5.78- BAKERY 270814 380954 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL c R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 51.38 212.67 101.76 42.69 351330 9116/2011 CITY OF EDINA 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC_. 911412011 7:47:36 TELEPHONE Council Check Register ADVERTISING OTHER Page - 7 9/9/2011 - 9115/2011 110312148 -8/11 5821.6188 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 270815 381115 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 270816 381392 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 270817 381393 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 270990 381747 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 270991 381819 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 351330 9116/2011 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST INC_. YORK OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY ADVERTISING OTHER 20.00 270774 110312148 -8/11 5821.6188 20.00 270774 110312148 -8/11 5841.6188 20.00 270774 110312148 -8111 5861.6188 1,535.25 110311893 270818 110311893 -8/11 5410.6122 1,595.25 351331 911512011 121096 DIAMOND MOWERS INC. 201.35 MOWER BLADES 00006089 270676 57687 5422.6530 201.35 351332 911512011 128084 DIET7, USA 33.14 ART WORK SOLD 270919 083111 5101.4413 33.14 351333 9/15/2011 - 123162 DISH NETWORK 52.40 8255 7070 8142 2839 270953 090411 7411.6406 52.40 351334 9/1512011 129157 DO- GOOD.BIZ INC 45.20 PREPARE BULK MAILING 270636 4321 -01 01387.1705.32 66.41 PREPARE BULK MAILING 270636 4321 -01 01386.1705.32 67.53 PREPARE BULK MAILING 270636 4321 -01 01385.1705.32 97.11 PREPARE BULK MAILING 270636 4321 -01 01388.1705.32 276.25 351335 911512011. 112663 DOLLARS & SENSE.: 683.33 DIRECT, MAIL ADVERTISING 270775 27941 5822.6122 683.33 DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING 270775 27941 5842.6122 683:34 DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING 270775 27941 5862.6122 2,050.00 351336 911512011 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES 3,878.12 CHEMICALS 00001840 270637 82701301 -11 5915.6586 5,165.09 CHEMICALS 00001840 270992 82701324 -11 5915.6586 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY GENERAL LABOR GENERALLABOR GENERAL LABOR GENERAL LABOR ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER VALLEY ESTATES NEIGHBORHOOD VIKING HILLS 2ND NEIGHBORHOOD COUNTRYSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD WESTCHESTER KNOLLS NEIGHBORHOO 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9114/2011 7:47:36 Council Check Register Page- 8 9/9/2011 — 9/15/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation. PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 9,043.21 351337 911512011 114277 EDEN PRAIRIE APPLIANCE 177.95 DISHWASHER REPAIR 270993 W75932 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 177.95 351338 911512011 123189 . EDINA LIQUOR 378.60 WINE 270819 138 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 378.60 35.1339 9115/2011 104172 ELECTRIC CRAFTSMAN INC. 8.53 118" CAP 00001768 270677 34799 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 8.53. 351340 9/15/2011 101956 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC 324.13 E- 82.PUMP TEST 270996 55743 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 710.25 E-83-PUMP TEST .: -> 270997 55745 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,034.38 351341 911512011 100752 . ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. 906.30 CTS GRATES 00001843 270638 QO4268 5932.6536 CASTINGS GENERAL STORM SEWER 611.33 CASTING 00001843 270639 QQ4242 5932.6536 CASTINGS GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,517.63 J 351342 9/1512011 100018 EXPERT T BILLING "_- 5,484.75 AUGUST BILLINGS 270820 0090611 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5,484.75 351343 911512011 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 54.46 HEADLAMP BULBS 00005431 270640 69- 046793 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 54.46 351344 911512011 122649 FARNER- BOCKEN COMPANY 561.75 FOOD 270821' 8467300 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS.GOLF COURSE 561.75 351345 9/1512011 126004 FERGUSON WATERWORKS 570.97 METER BOXES 00001791 270994 S01324815.002 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION - 445.86 METER BOXES 00001791 270995 501324815.001 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES. DISTRIBUTION 1,016.83 351346- 911512011 105420 FIKES SERVICES CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2011 7:47:36 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 9/9/2011 —9115/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 41.25 AIR DEODORIZERS 270776 31004 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY 41.25 351347 9115/2011 105703 FILM TEC CORP. 7,200.00 WATERISEWER REC REFUND 270678 ED106770 5901.4645 WATER REC FEE UTILITY REVENUES 13,380.00 SAC REFUND 270678 ED106770 1495.4307 SAC CHARGES - INSPECTIONS 20,580.00 351348 9115/2011 116492 FINANCE AND COMMERCE 210.71 AD FOR BID 270777 20882415 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 210.71 _ J 351349 - 9115/2011 129500 FLAT EARTH BREWING CO. 359.95 271033 3039 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 359.95 351350 9/15/2011 100759 FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY 366.28 REPLACE DOOR LOCKS 270822 251289 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 366.28 351351 911512011 101475 FOOTJOY 70.75 SHOES 270823 3873443 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP , PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 70.75 351352 911512011 126725 FORTNER, NOLA 35.75 ART WORK SOLD 270920 083111 5101.4413 ARTWORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 35.75 351353 911512011 104960. FRONTIER PRECISION INC. 7,907.63 UPS UNITS / SOFTWARE 00001089 270641 93765 421260.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT 7,907.63 351354 911512011 124424 GARVEY CONSTRUCTION INC. 6,092.00 ' CONCRETE WORK AT ARNESON 00001621 270954 182194 -1 47077.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ARNESON ACRES E GREENHOUSE 6,092.00 351355 911512011 100773 GENERAL PARTS INC. 169.00 SENSOR 00001866 _270955 1262624 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS ; BUILDING MAINTENANCE 169.00 351356 9/1512011 104652 GILLIS, LOUISE - I 600.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 270921 090811 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2011 7:47:36 Council Check Register Page - . 10 9/9/2011 — 9/15/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No . - Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 600.00 351357 9/15/2011 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 1,638.65 AUG TICKETS 00001807 270795 17643 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 1,638.65 351358 911512011 101103 GRAINGER - 315.66 DISPOSABLE GLOVES 00001725 270642 9616829553 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 84.61 LABEL TAPE 00005344 270643 9621471722 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 27.98 SPRING CHECK VALVES 00005396 270644 9622690387 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 72.84. SANDER 00001888 270796 9626362611 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 501.09 351369 9/15/2011 107.217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 949.50 270721 130994 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 851.25 270722 130993 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,800.75 351360 911512011 122746 GREEN, MICHELE ' 34.78 ART WORK SOLD- 270922 083111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 34.78 351361 9/1512011 - 120227 HARTSHORN, BOB 689.73 END OF SEASON PICNIC ITEMS 270956 090811 1628.4392.03 SENIOR SOFTBALL SENIOR CITIZENS 689.73 351362 9/1512011 123145 HAUTH ENTERPRISES 585.00 PETTING ZOO 270778 SEPT 17 EVENT_ 1600.4390.49 BARNYARD BOOGIE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 585.00 351363 9115/2011 100797 HAWKINS INC. 3,023.40 CHEMICALS = 00001841 270645 3259253 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 3,023.40 351364 9/15/2011 101576 HEGGIES PIZZA 75.35 PIZZA 270824 1710303 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 75.35 351365 9/1512011 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 282.24 'MEAT PATTIES 270825 - 023402 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 282.24 R55CKREG LOG20000 ' CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2011 7:47:36 Council Check Register Page - 11 9/9/2011 —9115/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 351366 911512011 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 160.31 TECHNICAL SUPPORT 270957 110862024 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 160.31 351367 9/1512011 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 319.35 SOAP, CARPET CLEANER 00002193 270998 6888301 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 319.35 351368 9115/2011 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 85.50 270852 572275 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 929.00 270853 572245 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 653.00 270854 571577 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,508.40 270855 572081 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,175.90 i 351369 9115/2011 129056 HYDRO -VAC INC. 344.00 TV STORM SEWER LINE 00001802 270646 6318 5932.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL STORM SEWER 344.00 1 351370 9/15/2011 129430 HYDROTECH SYSTEMS LTD - 121,686.00 FLOWRIDER PUMP 270679 N35A2 5300.1715 LAND IMPROVEMENTS AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 121,686.00 351371 911612011 120086 IDEAL SERVICE INC. 2,477.32 VFD REPAIRS, PMS 00001803 270647 4751 5912.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS WELL HOUSES 2,477.32 351372 911512011 129508 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS 1,825.00 POSTAGE MAILING ESTIMATE 270779 01 5910.6235 POSTAGE GENERAL (BILLING) 1,825.00 351373 9/15/2011 128368 INDEPENDENT_ STATIONERS 941.73 TONER CARTRIDGES 00001887 270797 IN- 000081092 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES — CENT SVC PW BUILDING 941.73 351374 9115/2011 104696 INT'L SECURITY PRODUCTS 42.84 FENCE PARTS 00006068 270680 303884 5431.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 42.84 351375 911512011 100828 JERRY'S FOODS 25.09 270780 083111 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 30.33 270780 083111 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2011 7:47:36 Council Check Register Page - 12 9/9/2011 -9/15/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 35.00 270780 083111 1600.4390.06 SAFETY,CAMP PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 45.46 270780 083111 1628:6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 76.97 270780 083111 1470.6106 MEETING EXPENSE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 212.85 351376 911512011 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 133.25 270723 161961 T 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 170.35 270856 1622278 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 21.50_. 270857 1619631 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 3,301.50 270858 1619630 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING= 2,450.95 f 270859 1619632 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 53.80 270860 1619633 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 529.55 270861 1619606 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 77.85 271034 1619644 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK-SELLING 2,958.40 27. 1035 1619643 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 9,697.15 351377 9115/2011 124104 JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES INC. 307.80 COURSE PAINT 00006364 270681 58982415 5422.6406 GENERAL'SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 307.80 361379 9/1512011 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 978.54 270724 1127662 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 294.50 270725 1127554 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 625.58 270726 1127259 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 624.24 270727 1127255 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,193.86 270728 1127253 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 37.12 270729 1128162 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 627.26 270730. 1128163 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 136.40 270731 1127661 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 16.20- 270732 508435 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 445.57- 270733 508068 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 207.24 270862 1131247 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,703.96 270663 1131246 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,685.81 270864 1131243 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 982.95 270665 1131245 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,096.15 270866 1131244 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.12 270867. 1131231 5862:5513. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,693.22 270868 1131242. 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE - _ VERNON SELLING 875.11 270869- 1131233 5822.5513 COST OF,GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,292.21 270870 1131232 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 362.59 270871 1131226 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS'SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 9/14/2011 7:47:36 Page - 13 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK'SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS. SOLD WINE YORK SELLING Council Check Register YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING . COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK,SELLING 9/9/2011 - 9/1512011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 139.33 271036 1131227 5822.5512 602.62 271037 1131229 5822.5513 278,24 271038 1131228 5842.5512 6,103.03 271039 1131235 5842.5512 3,631.78 271040 1131238 5842.5512 1,831,67 271041 1131237 5842.5513 1,121.31 271042 1131239 5842.5513 22,11 271043 1131240 5842.5513 197.74 271044 1131241 5842.5512 183.36 271045 1131230 5842.5513 1,998.90 271046 1131234 5842.5513 31,066.18 351380 9/15/2011 102719 JOHNSON, PHILLIP 247.03 DVD DISCS 270958 090611 5125.5510 247.03 351381 9/15/2011 129516 JOHNSON, ZACHARY SCOT 150.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 9/18/11 270985 090911 5621.6136 150.00 351382 9115/2011 123696 JOHNSTON, TORI 72.80 ART WORK SOLD 270923 083111 5101.4413 72.80 351383 911512011 111018 KEEPRS INC. 939.05 AMMO 270959 169245 1400.6551 224.44 AMMO 270960 171148 1400.6551 1,163.49 351384 911512011 124730 KEITH, BARBARA 35.06 ART WORK SOLD 270924 083111 5101.4413 35.06 351385 9/15/2011 112618 KOLLMER CONSULTANTS INC. 15,910.00 FIELD INSPECTION 276798 1565 05509.1705.21 1,589.00 NEW LOGO DESIGN . 270799 1564 05509.1705.20 ._ 17,499.00 351386 911512011 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 416.08 HOSE CLAMPS, WASHERS, FITTINGS)005343 270648 9300061510 1553.6530 82.00 FITTINGS 00005342 270649, 9300061511 1553.6530 9/14/2011 7:47:36 Page - 13 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK'SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS. SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING . COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK,SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MEDIA STUDIO PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART, WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES CONSULTING INSPECTION GLEASON WATER TOWER REHAB CONSULTING DESIGN GLEASON WATER TOWER REHAB REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN - R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2011 7:47:36 Council Check Register Page - 14 9/9/2011 - 9/15/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 326.85 SCREWS, RIVETS 00001868 270800 9300061509 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 824.93 351387 9/15/2011 100854 LEITNER COMPANY 710.51 TOPDRESS MIX 00002370 270826 205877 5630.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES 710.51 361388 911512011 106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC. 116.58 COPIER SERVICE 00005440 270650 1290394 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 116.58 351389 911512011 125208 LOVEJOY, NICHOLAS 120.16 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 270781 090211 1554.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENT SERV GEN - MIS 51.10 CELL PHONE REIMBURSEMENT 270782 090711 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 171.26 351390 911512011 101792 LUBE -TECH 815.30 GAS 00006045 270682 1942726 5431.6581 GASOLINE RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 1,445.43. DIESEL 00006046 270683 1942727 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,065.45 GAS 00006045 270684 1942728 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 3,326.18 351391 9115/2011 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 916.98 270734 115781 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 30.00 270735 115556 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 30.00 270872 115970 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 1,167.32 270872 115970 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,144.30 351392 9/1512011 124000 MARTIN, KAYLIN 6.00 WORKSHOP EXPENSE 271016 090611 2210.6106 MEETING EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 30.00 WORKSHOP EXPENSE 271016 090611 2210.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS COMMUNICATIONS 36.00 351393 911512011 126839 MCDONALD, LILLIAN 600.00 HOSTING FEE 271017 083011 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 600.00 351394 9115/2011 101483 MENARDS 23.98 PAINT 00006288 270685 22407 5424.6530 REPAIR PARTS RANGE 34.07 WEED CUTTERS 00006074 270686 22272 5431.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 29.28 PAINT, LATH 00002372 270964 31386 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/9/2011 - 9115/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 17.70 PUTTY, SCRAPER BLADES 00006288 270999 88044 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 62.36 GLOVES, PAINT_ 00006288 271000 6574 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 84.17 LUMBER 00006288 271001 5522 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 117.35 MULCH 00002201 .271002 34342 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 410.87 BUILDING MATERIALS 00001823 271019 30301 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 779.78 - 351395 911512011 101987 MENARDS 38.26 FUEL PREMIX, LUBRICANT 00002365 270827 20005 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 66.83 TAPE, HEX KEYS, PAINT 00002372 270965 21761 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 105.09 351396 9/15/2011 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 233.84 FIELD PAINT 00001819 270651 134974 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER 149.52 BALLFIELD SUPPLIES 00001563 271018 135106 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 383.36 351397 911512011 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME 365,307.57 SEWER SERVICE 270687 0000969530 5922.6302 SEWER SERVICE METRO 365,307.57 351396 9115/2011 129516 MEYER; CHERI - 48.75 ARTWORK SOLD 270925 090111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 48.75 351399 9/1512011 101161 - MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 555.48 PAPER PRODUCTS 00003644 271003 - 21625 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 555.48 351400 9/15/2011 100913 MINNEAPOLIS 8 SUBURBAN SEWER S 1,225.00 REPLACE WATER SERVICE 00001809 271004 33924, 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 980.00 INSTALL NEW STANDPIPE 00001808 271005 33922 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2,205.00 351401 9115/2011 101320 MINNEAPOLIS AREA ASSOC OF REAL 111.00 MLS ACCESS FEE 270783 1669743 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 111.00 351402 9/15/2011 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 24,796.03 WATER PURCHASED 270688 431 - 0005.300 -9/ 5913.6601 WATER PURCHASED 11 24,796.03 9/14/2011 7:47:36 Page - 15 Business Unit, CLUB HOUSE CLUB HOUSE GOLF ADMINISTRATION EDINBOROUGH PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES FIELD'MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE SEWER TREATMENT ART CENTER REVENUES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION ASSESSING DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG LOG20000 MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS REPAIR PARTS CITY OF EDINA REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE Council Check Register 9/9/2011 - 9/1512011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 351403 911512011 120051 MINNESOTA FIRE CHIEF MAGAZINE 80.00 DIRECTORY LISTING 270961 60150 7410.6105 80.00 351404 911512011 106193 MINNESOTA HIGHWAY SAFETY AND 439.00 DWI TRAINING 270962 629430 -2567 2340.6406 386.00 EVOC LAW ENFORCEMENT 270963 629430 -2560 2340.6406 825.00 351405 9115/2011 120301 MINNESOTA MULCH & SOIL 567.76 MANURE COMPOST 270689 D11019 5422.6541 2,300.00 MULCH 270690 D10818 5422.6406 2,867.76 351406 911512011 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT 398.54 WATER MAIN PARTS 00001794 270652 0272750 5913.6406 398.54 351407 9/1512011 105430 MINNESOTA SUPPLY COMPANY 237.26 . SHELF BEAMS, WIRE DECKS 00001489 271006 M59561 5913.6406 237.26 351408 911512011 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 1,578.84 SPRAYER ENGINE REPAIR 270691 805496 -00 5422.6180 82.39 IDLER, WASHERS 00006073 270692 809673 -00 5422.6530 78.10 TIRE 00002363 270828 809724 -00 5630.6530 33.87 IRRIGATION PARTS 00001821 271020 810735 -00 1643.6530 1,773.20 351409 9/1512011 101390 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES 1 7,561.13 FIRE HOSE 00003593 271007 00260687_SNV 1470.6406 7,561.13 351410 911612011 129304 NELSON, DAVID 71.50 ART WORK SOLD 270926 090811 5101.4413 71.50 351411 911512011 102260 NORMAN, MIKE 55.25 ART WORK SOLD 270927 083111 5101.4413 55.25 9/14/2011 7:47:36 Page - 16 Subledger Account Description Business Unit DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PSTF ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES DWI FORFEITURE GENERAL SUPPLIES DWI FORFEITURE PLANTINGS & TREES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2011 7:47:36 Council Check Register Page - 17 9/9/2011 —9/15/2011 Check # Date -Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 351412 9115/2011 102652 NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP. 92.43 STAINLESS STEEL CLEANER 00001870 270801 5040744 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING, 92.43 351413 9115/2011 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC. 5,657.00 PAVEMENT PATCH 270653 32662 05493.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WM -493 INTERLACHEN CIRCLE 5,657.00 . 351414 911512011 116114 OCE 144.96 AUG MAINTENANCE 270654 987521045 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 144.96 351415 911512011 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 36.47 PAPER 270829 1381189741 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 36.47 351416 911512011 124089 OHMANN, NANCY 65.65 ART WORK SOLD 270928 083111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 65.65 351417 9/15/2011 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 18.26 SAW CHAIN 00001575 271008 653463 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES. `. DISTRIBUTION 18.26 351418 911512011 123786 OLSON, VICKI 31.20 ART WORK SOLD 270929 083111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 31.20 351419- 9/15/2011 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 227.90 COOKIES 270830 80783895 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 227.90 351420 9/15/2011 129485 PAPCO INC. 748.55 CLEANING SUPPLIES 270966 66954 -1 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 748.55 351421 9/1512011 129514 PAPER, ELIZABETH 13.65 ART WORK SOLD 270930 090111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 13.65 351422 911512011 100347 P_ AUSTIS & SONS 130.50 270736 8317378 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2011 7:47 :36 Council'Check Register Page - 18 9/9/2011 - 9/15/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledge? Account Description Business Unit 737.75 270737 8318166 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,248.51 270873 8318159 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,487.26 270874 8318150 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,604.02 351423 911512011 126492 PAYPAL INC. 39.95 MONTHLY FEE 270655 12897659 5910.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES GENERAL (BILLING) 39.95 351424 911512011 123191 PENTEON 1,700.00 CITY EXTRA WEB SERVICES 271021 20142 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 1,700.00 351425 9/1512011 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 454.50 270831 71966005 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 688.50 270832 73951004 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 182.90 270875 65655554 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,325.90 351426 911612011 100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS 4,400.00 INSTALL DRAIN TILE AT PARK 00001870 271022 131 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 4,400.00 351427 9/1512011 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 20.68 270738 2118813 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 443.34 270739 2118808 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 9.22- 270740 3465982 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 9.31- 270741 3465981 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 259.94 270876 2121708 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 434.83 270877 2121695 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 292.92 270878 2121699 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 57.12 270879 2121698 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 826.16 270880 2121697 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 333.48 270881 2121707 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,451.95 270882 2121705 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 57.12 270883 2121706 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 57.12 271047 2121702 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 500.82 271048 2121704 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 700.80 271049 2121696 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,475.87 271050 2121703 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,247.82 271051 2121701 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 9,141.44 R55CKREG LOG20000 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS-SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 919/2011 - 9/15/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 351428 911512011 ., COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 100958 PLUNKETTS PEST CONTROL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 46.30 PEST CONTROL 270967 2535207 7411.6103 46.30 351429 9/1512011 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 1,639.12 TIRES 00005432 270656 679034 1553.6583 1,639.12 351430 911512011 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 325.00 NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 270784 090911 1628.6235 325.00 351431 9/1512011 126290 PRESTRUD, MARY CLARE 48.75 ART WORK SOLD 270931 090111 5101.4413 48.75 351432 9115/2011 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 108.00 BLADE SHARPENING 00008027 270785 255352 5521.6215 106.00 351433 9115/2011 100971 QUALITY WINE 731.20 270742 504720 -00 5862.5513 1,918.72 270743 504566 -00 5862.5513 1,804.05 270744 50446400 5862.5512 196.80 270745 501419 -00 5822.5513 2,492.80 270746 501478 -00 5822.5513 656.00 270747 503298 -00 5862.5513 1,312.00 270748 503290 -00 5862.5513 49.60 270884 501781 -00 5822.5513 103.24 270885 504465 -00 5822.5512 129.60 270886 504567 -00 5822.5513 1,425.61 270887 504721 -00 5822.5513 186.13 270888 504565 -00 5842.5513 1,107.47 270889 504591 -00 5842.5512 468.00 270890 504463 -00 5842.5512 241.80 271052 504719 -CO 5842.5514 -983.61 271053 504718 -00 5842.5513 13,806.63 351434 9/1512011 105324 READY WATT ELECTRIC 3,684.00 SIREN MAINTENANCE 270968 95877 1460.6230 9/14/2011 7:47:36 Page - 19 Subledger Account Description Business Unit PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY . TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POSTAGE SENIOR CITIZENS ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS-SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CIVILIAN DEFENSE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 9/9/2011 — 9/15/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 3,684.00 351435 9/15/2011 125936 REINDERS 180.64 INSECTICIDE 00006105 270693 3010866 -00 5422.6545 CHEMICALS 1644.6103 180.64 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1647.6103 351436 9/15/2011 1470.6104 101963 S & S TREE SPECIALISTS RIDGE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION 04374.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 1,050.00 OAK WILT PROGRAM SERVICES 00001839 271023 53852 04375.1705.21 1,050.00 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 05511.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 351437 9/15/2011 01334.1705.21 100988 SAFETY KLEEN BA -334 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 400.05 RECYCLE PARTS WASHER 00005434 270657 54808843 400.05 351438 9/1512011 124247 SAM'S ROYAL LAWN SERVICE. 210.16 WEED CONTROL 00001838 271024 303 210.16 351439 911512011 127049 SCHNEIDER, KATHERINE 480.00 FITNESS TRAINING 271009 090511 480.00 351440 911512011 100349 SCOTT COUNTY 325.00 . OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 270969 090911, 325.00 351441 9/1512011 100995 SEH 608.87 RIDGE RD RECONSTR 270658 246132 1,014.79 RIDGE RD RECONSTR 270658 246132 6,900.55 RIDGE RD RECONSTR 270658 246132 11,771.52 RIDGE RD RECONSTR 270658 246132 11,986.46 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECONSTR 270659 246133 12,726.94 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECONSTR 270659 246133 25,627.43 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECONSTR 270659 246133 26,148.07 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECONSTR 270659 246133 96,784.63 351442 9/15/2011 103249 SHANNON, JIM 140.00 EP ENTERTAINMENT 9122/11 270986 090911 140.00 351443 911512011 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1470.6104 CONFERENCES &SCHOOLS 9/14/2011 7:47:36 Page - 20 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS TREES & MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PATHS &HARD SURFACE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 03461:1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION SS-461 RIDGE RD RECONSTRUCTION 05510.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WM -510 RIDGE RD RECONSTRUCTION 01384.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION RIDGE ROAD RECONSTRUCTION 04374.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION STS -374 RIDGE ROAD. 03460.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 04375.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 05511.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 01334.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -334 MINNEHAHA WOODS RECON 5621.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER EDINBOROUGH ADMINISTRATION CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2011 7:47:36 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 21 9/9/2011 -9/15/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 45.50 ART WORK SOLD 270932 090111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 45.50 351444 911512011 103237 SHIRLEY, TOM 213.03 . MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 270970 090711 5631.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE CENTENNIAL ADMINISTRATION 213.03 361445 9/1612011 129609 SIGNATURE OUTDOOR SERVICES LLC 250.00 BLVD MOWING 00001469 270833 2011660 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 250.00 351446 911512011 119422 SIZER, CORA LEE 30.55 ART WORK SOLD 270933 090111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD - ART CENTER REVENUES 30.55 351447 9115/2011 125094 SLACK, JOAN 24.70 ART WORK SOLD 270934 090111 5101.4413 ART. WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 24.70 '351448 9/15/2011 122368', SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY 1,190.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION FEES 270971 8585 1400.6104 CONFERENCES &SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,190.00 r 351449 9/1512011 127878 SOUTHERN WINE AND SPIRITS 2,119.00 270749 1594130 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 843.50 270750 1608977 5862:5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 82.50 270891 1608978 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 168.50 270892 1608981 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 751.50 271054 1594129 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 40.62 271055 1592135 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 139.45 271056 1592133 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,041.50 271057 1594131 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,251.50 271058 1608980 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6,438.07 351450 911512011 110977 SOW, ADAMA 65.00 ART WORK SOLD 270935 090111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 65.00 351451 9/1512011 105193 SPAIN, MARK 200.00 TREE TRIMMING 270694 070711 5422.6275 COURSE BEAUTIFICATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 200.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2011 7:47:36 Council Check Register Page - 22 9/9/2011 — 9/15/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 351462 911612011 102698 SPOONER, ANNE 78.00 ART WORK SOLD 270936 090111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 78.00 351453 911512011 106015 SPORT SYSTEMS UNLIMITED CORP. 825.08 POLY & NET KIT 00008021 270786 0033603 -IN 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 825.08 351454 9115/2011 122455 SPRING LAKE ENGINEERING 4,484.02 SCADA PROGRAMMING 00005430 271010 1159 .05508.1705 CONSTR. IN PROGRESS WM -508 SCADA SYSTEM 4,484.02 351455 911512011 102251 ST. ANDREWS PRODUCTS CO 183.82 GOLF PENCILS 270834 0000654364 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE. r 183.82 361456 9/1512011 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 2,960.00 , . HELP WANTED ADS 270787 083111 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL -. 3,625.00 FALL INTO THE ARTS ADS 270787 083111 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES. 6,585.00 351457 9/1612011 129409 STEEN, BARB 35.10 ART WORK SOLD 270937 090111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 35.10 i 351458 9/1512011 127108 STONE & STEEL 42.00 MEMORIAL STONE 270835, 1689 2410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BRAEMAR MEMORIAL FUND 42.00 351459 911512011 106030 STRATEGIC EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY C 1,565.00 . `FREEZER COUNTER, WORK TOP 00009177 270972 1782219 5111:6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT- 1,565.00 351460 9115/2011 101015 STREICHERS 106:86 HOLSTER 270973 1861932 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE — POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 41.67 TRAINING ROUNDS 270974 1861931 1400.6104 CONFERENCES &,SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 148.53 351461 9/15/2011 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 40.04 PUBLISH NOTICE 270695 1335575 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 20.02 AD FOR BID 270696 1335576 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL`' ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2011 7:47:36 Council Check Register Page - 23 9/9/2011 - 9/15/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 60.06 351462 9116/2011 121492 SUPERIOR TURF SERVICES INC. 480.94 SEED 00006076 270697 7425 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 480.94 351463 9115/2011 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 708.00 270893 VO00248 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 568.00 270894 VO00247 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,296.00 351464 911512011 110921 TACKETT, COURTNEY 5.00 OVERPAID FOR PROGRAM 270788 REFUND 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 5.00 351465 911512011 129506 TADDIKEN, DAVID 69.36 UTILITY OVERPAYMENT REFUND 270789 5904 FAIRFAX 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET AVE 69.36 351466 911512011 120325 TCC MATERIALS 292.01 MORTAR MIX 00001790 270660 0000535959 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 12.00- CREDIT 270661 0000536307 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 280.01 351467 911512011 102227 THOMPSON, PAUL 26.00 ART WORK SOLD ' . 270938 090111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART - CENTER REVENUES 26.00 351468 911512011 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 632.00 270895 00770847 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 1,365.50 270896 655003 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 78.00 270897 655004 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 315.20 271011 655438 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 2,390.70 351469 911512011 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 291.66 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 270790 2011 -56460 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 291.67 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 270790 2011 -56460 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 291.67 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 270790 2011 -56460 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 875.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2011 7:47:36 Council Check Register Page - 24 9/9/2011 -9/15/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 351470 9/15/2011 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 40.80 WELDING SUPPLIES 270836 428172 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 40.60 .351471 9/1512011 129507 TORVUND, DOUGLAS - 1,663.00 ELECTRICAL INSPECTIONS 270791 JULY -AUG 1495.4113 ELECTRICAL PERMITS INSPECTIONS 1,663.00 351472 9115/2011 124753 TOSHIBA FINANCIAL SERVICES - 200.73 COPIER USAGE 270975 185706215 7410.6575 PRINTING PSTF'ADMINISTRATION 200.73 351473 9/15/2011 101693 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS 115.43 USB SCANNER CABLES 270837 26816 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 115.43 351474 9/1512011 103163 TREUTING, KRISTEN 38.68 ART WORK SOLD 270939 090111 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 38:68 351475 9/15/2011 101619 TRI- COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT ASS 50.00 AGENCY DUES 270976 2011 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT-.'GENERAL 50.00 351476 9115/2011 118190 TURFWERKS LLC - 21.90 . RAKE SPRING 00006067 270698 J149697B 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 159.48 RAKE SPRINGS 00006067 270699 J149697A 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 147.08 RAKE SPRINGS 00006067 270700 J149697 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 328.46 351477 911512011 123969 TWIN CITIES OCCUPATIONAL HEALT 299.20 FITNESS FOR DUTY EXAM .270838 101825365 1301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 299.20 351478 911512011 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 296.58 SEED 00006106 270701 25958 5422.6543 SOD &BLACK DIRT MAINT -OF- COURSE & GROUNDS 296.58 351479 9/1512011 115379 U.S. BANK 17.90 NET ZERO 270977 090211 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 38.20 INTERNET 270977 090211 1550.6155 BANK SERVICES CHARGES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 56.10 CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2011 7:47:36 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 25 9/9/2011 - 9/15/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 351480 9.11612011 101061 UNIFORMS UNLIMITED 727.89 UNIFORMS 270978 083111 1400.6203 , UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 727.89 351481 9/1512011 103298 UPS STORE #1716, THE 12.05 SHIPPING CHARGE 00005438 270662 TRAN:8388 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 12.05 351482 911612011 101908 US FOODSERVICE INC 177.40 270839, 083111 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 380.58 270839 083111 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 5,350.20 270839 083111 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 5,908.18 = 351483 911512011 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 5,413.56 REBUILD CB 00001804 270663 16933 5932.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS, GENERAL STORM SEWER 180.00 SAW CUT 00001804 270664 16941 5932.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL STORM SEWER 5,593.56 351484 9115/2011 101068 VAN PAPER CO. 27.65 URINAL SCREENS 270840 20734401 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 1,128.41 LINERS, TOWELS, CUPS 270841 209443 -00 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 1,156.06 351485 9115/2011 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 108.41 270979 2623209908 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 108.41 361486 9/1512011 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 160.31 BATTERY 00002368 270842 57282 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 21.38- CREDIT 00002368 270843 57336 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 138.93 351487 911512011 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY 1,071.84 WIRE, TERMINALS 00001864 270802 5684385 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 11.76 SAFETY GLASSES 00001879 270803. 5703475 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,083.60 351488 911512011 119454 VINOCOPIA 82.50 270751 0043890 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS-SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 612.00 271059 0043987 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2011 7:47:36 Council` Check Register _ Page- 26 9/9/2011 - 9/15/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit: 694.50 351489 9/15/2011 100023 VOGEL, ROBERT C. 2,250.00 CONSULTING FEES 270980 211020 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 2,250.00 351490 9115/2011 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 297.98 LIGHT BULBS 00001878 270804 15187356-00' 1375.6530 REPAIR PARTS PARKING RAMP 297.98 351491 9/1512011 121042 WALLACE CARLSON PRINTING 523.69 RECEIPTS 00009191 270981 44176 5110.6575 PRINTING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION' 122.91 MEMBERSHIP CARDS 00009191 270982 44177 5110.6575 N PRINTING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 646.60 351492 9/15/2011 100183 WASHINGTON COUNTY ' 115.00 ._.OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 270983 090911 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 115.00 351493 911512011 123618 WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC 226.01 LEAK LOCATE 00001801 270665 2677 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 226.01 351494 9115/2011 129518 WENZEL PLYMOUTH PLUMBING 895.00 INSTALL PRESSURE VALVE 271012 27322 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 895.00 - 351495 911512011 127768 WIGLEY AND ASSOCIATES 1,350.00 PROJECT SERVICES 270702 197813 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 1,350.00 351496 911512011. 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 398.40 270752 278761 -00 5842.5513 COST.OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,114.15 270753 278749 -00 ., 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 270.30 270754 278171 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,782.85 351497 911512011 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 2,718.24 270755 375589 5862.5513 COST OF.GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 193.49 270756 375417 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 313.05 270898 376264 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5,605.51 270899 376266 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # 1,585.31 5,585.14 902.00 16,902.74 351498 911512011 124291 MARTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA 2,232.00 2,624.40 261.69 394.56 1,806.75. 1,5,92.95 .1,704.95 6,195.99 40.00- 735.35- 398.01- 116.25- 81.10 1,190.17 23,474.98 60.33 6,413.14 1,653.65 2,072.50- 2,072.50- r 351499 911512011 49,324.20 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 919/2011 - 9/1512011 Doc No Inv No Account No 270900 .376262 5862.5513 271060 376265 5842.5513 271061 376263 5842.5513 270757 624494 270758 624493 270759 623570 270760 623272 270761 622645 270762 625297 270763 622643 270764 625298 270765 839952 270766 840730 270767 840729 270768 840347 270901 625300 270902 625301 270903 625302 270904 625296 270904 625296 270905 625303 270906 838891 270906 838891 271062 625304 124529 ' WIRTZ BEVERAGE MINNESOTA BEER 629.20 270844 796166 .03 270907 797168 2,363.25 270908 797167 .01 270909 796405 .03 270910 - 796406 86.20 270911 796408 3,098.76 270912 796407 3,252.81 270913 796138 431.80 271013 798939 3,566.10 271063 799096 80.90 271064 799097 Subledger Account. Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLDWINE 9/14/2011 7:47:36 Page - 27 Business Unit VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF, GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD,MIX VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR— VERNON SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING. 5842.5512 COST OF.'GOODS SOLD LIQUOR -' YORKSELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR-. = VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE - YORK SELLING 5421.5514 1 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5822.5514 --COST OF GOODS' SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2011 7:47:36 Council Check Register Page - 28 9/9/2011 — 9/15/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 13,509.09 351500 9115/2011 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 1,071.56 44TH ST IMPROVEMENTS 270666 10 -01686 -170 06045.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION TS-45 W 44TH ST RECON 1,317.50 44TH ST IMPROVEMENTS 270666 10 -01686 -170 03466.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION SS-466 W 44TH ST RECON 5,269.98 44TH ST IMPROVEMENTS 270666 10- 01686 -170 04381.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION INTERLACHEN BLVD SIDEWALK 11,664.22 44TH ST IMPROVEMENTS 270666 10- 01686 -170 05516.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION W 44TH ST RECON 24,593.24 44TH ST IMPROVEMENTS 270666 10- 01686 -170 01383.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -383 W44TH ST 105.22 70TH ST CONSTR 270667 9- 01686 -180 03457.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION SS-457 W70TH TS IMPLEMENTATION 701.45 70TH ST CONSTR 270667 9- 01686 -180 05503.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WM -503 W70TH ST TRAFFIC STUDY 1,402.90 70TH ST CONSTR 270667 9- 01686 -180 06043.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION TS-43 W 70TH ST RECON 1,508.12 70TH ST CONSTR 270667 9- 01686 -180 08057.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION L -57 W 70TH ST RECON 1,718.55 70TH ST CONSTR 270667 9- 01686 -180 06044.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION TS-44 W 70TH ST RECON 3,437.11 70TH ST CONSTR 270667 9- 01686- 180 04369.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION STS -369 W 70TH STREET 26,199.15 70TH ST CONSTR 270667 9 -01686 -180 01367.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -367 W70TH TRAFFIC IMPLEMENT 78,989.00 351501 911512011 101726 XCEL ENERGY 10.79 51- 0194596 -8 270703 294792609 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 958.42 51- 5847121 -5 270704 295060108 5914.6185 LIGHT & POWER TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 5,123.81 51- 6621207 -1 270705 294905363 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 26,110.95 51 -4888627 -1 270706 294874659 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 1,352.40 51- 6979948-4 270707 294912837 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1,769.72 51- 6979948-4 270707 294912837 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY 2,093.22 51- 6979948-4 270707 294912837 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK OCCUPANCY 879.08 51- 6137136 -8 270708 294896826 5430.6185 LIGHT & POWER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 3,955.48 51- 6840050 -6 270984 295414697 5921.6185 LIGHT & POWER SANITARY LIFT STATION MAINT 9,011.22 51- 6824328 -7 271066 295784883 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER CLUB HOUSE 5,272.09 51- 6121102 -5 271067 295581002 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 56,537.18 351502 911512011 129331 YOUNG, PAUL 150.00 DJ SERVICES - BARNYARD BOOGIE 270792 090811 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 150.00 351503 9/1512011 129508 IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS 1,825.00 POSTAGE MAILING ESTIMATE 271089 01REV 5910.6235 POSTAGE GENERAL (BILLING) 1,825.00 351504 9115/2011 129524 MN 350 - 50.00 REGISTRATION FEE 271088 091311 1122.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM 50.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 9/14/2011 7:47:36 Council Check Register Page - 29 9/9/2011 —9/15/2011 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 351605 9/1512011 118072 THOMPSON, PAUL 11.75 REIMBURSEMENT 271087 091311 1122.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM 11.75 1,197,537.53 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,197,537.53' Total Payments 1,197,537.53 i R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 9/9/2011 - 9115/2011 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 77,549.55 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 11,515.60 02300 POLICE SPECIAL REVENUE 825.00 02400 BRAEMAR MEMORIAL FUND 42.00 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 77,671.32 04200 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 7,907.63 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 26,148.07 05100 ART CENTER FUND 4,595.18 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 121,794.41 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 39,760.62 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 28,278.98 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 3,808.47 05800 LIQUOR FUND 196,019.22 05900 UTILITY FUND 512,798.90 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 47,663.78 05950 RECYCLING FUND 38,820.60 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 2,338.20 Report Totals 1,197,537.53 We confirm to the best of our knowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing poll ie and procedures ate ' �� 9114/2011 7:48:19 Page- 1 tNA. ow Le )0 Cn • l��RPORA'LF'�� ,aaa REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. IV. C. From: Matt Sisterman I.T. Director Date: September 20, 2011 Subject: Police & Fire Dispatch Stratus Server Replacement Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: 9/15/2011 12/15/2011 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. SunGard Public Sector, Inc. 1. $47,660.88 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: SunGard Public Sector, Inc. $47,660.88 GENERAL INFORMATION: Stratus servers are primarily used for mission - critical applications, i.e. CAD, (Computer Aided Dispatching) to ensure that applications are protected against downtime and data loss. When the City's original Stratus server was purchased in 2006, it was the only available solution to be certified at the City's requirement of "5 -nines compliant," with a guarantee of 99.99999% uptime. By integrating 24/7 "around- the - clock" remote monitoring services with resilient and completely redundant hardware technologies, Stratus delivers unparalleled uptime assurance. Our current Stratus server has reached the end of its useful life, and needs to be replaced in order to support the hardware and software advancements that have been made over the past five years. The E911 fund will pay for this expenditure, of which 24% will be reimbursed by the City of Golden Valley per our current dispatching agreement. Staff recommends we proceed with the purchase. The Recommended Bid is I X within budget not Information Technology Department , et f John Wallin, Finance Director I, Citp Manager .. _ , fo o e �y �a88 REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $20,000 /CHANGE ORDER To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item No. IV. D. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer Date: September 20, 2011 Subject: Award of Bid - Contract No. PW 11 -12 Improvement No. A -241 West 70 Street Landscaping Date Bid Opened or Quote Received: Bid or Quote Expiration Date: September 13, 2011 November 13, 2011 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Cedar Ridge Landscaping, Inc. ' $ 115,001.10 2. Noble Nursery $ 139,489.50 3. Hoffman & McNamara Co. $ 139,904.00 4. Greensca a Companies, Inc. $ 224,873.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Cedar Ridge Landscaping, Inc. $ 115,001.10 GENERAL INFORMATION: This purchase is for the installation of landscaping for the West 70th Street Roadway Reconstruction Project to be planted in the spring of 2012. If you recall residents along the roadway were sent concept plans last winter and were asked for their opinion of the proposed landscaping. The landscape architect and their staff took into account the residents comments and revised the plan to bid out this fall. The revised concept plan, which reflects the final plan, is attached to this report. The project includes planting of the bituminous median located along West 70th Street on the westerly side of TH100. This project also includes adding infill boulevard trees where no boulevard or front yard trees exist today, see attached concept plan. Staff will work with the residents that wish to receive these trees. Residents between West Shore Drive and Wooddale Avenue were sent out notices that their boulevard area is narrower than they might have originally understood. The notices also included descriptions of three different types of Daylilies. One style of Daylilies will be chosen per the overall preference of the residents to be planted within the boulevard area. These Daylilies will be planted as part of the project. The residents will be required to maintain the Daylilies after the three year maintenance period. There are also a number of residents that are located between TH100 and West Shore Drive that are also interested in receiving planting material, which they would plant and maintain within the boulevard area of their homes. Staff will work with these residents to prepare an agreement for City Council to approve in order to add this cost to their special assessment, similar to the turn - around agreements that we are offering to residents along West 70th Street. The feasibility study included this cost in the overall cost of $3,057,600. The combined construction cost of the project, general construction and landscaping is $2,934,704.85. The Landscape Architects estimate is $202,614.50. Staff recommends awarding this bid to Cedar Ridge Landscaping, Inc. I- O " Signature The Recommended Bid is within budget nc Public Works G:\PW\CENTRALSVCS\ENG DIV \PROJECTS \CONTRACTS \2011 \ENG 11 -12 70th Landscaping \ADMIN \MISC \Award of Bid Contr PW 11 -12 Imp A -241 W 70th St Landscaping.docx WEST- PROJECTAREA o o ' i AREAA aREA s AREA C i 1 l; • � I NORMANDALE BLVD / '.-,i.7 � � r W TOTH ST o 0 - - - -= �• a E I = ARNESON ACRES PARK • i : I � EXISJMG TREE e *- o. _a. reach `� ~ 3 i• WESTSHORE TO CORNELIA _ +:�eA 4 • A e i A ' w- 1 y r 1 f .. -, i I_ '' I• j I ... EXISTING (TYPICAL) TREE i I ` t EXISTING TREE .- __._.-- �Tr ",.. �•:.:.._ - _..;, -. r,- - c -W 70TH ST - -- - - -- (TYPICAL► -- 'tom _ - r' J s � r f a 1 a ' - ( , 3 - - CORNELIA SCHOOL PARK 0 { y + a w � a j NTS A SEH CHRIST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH -- -- ;7 O ' EXISTING TREE r - ..__.._._.._ (TYPICAL) AREA C i 1 l; • � I NORMANDALE BLVD / '.-,i.7 � � r W TOTH ST o 0 - - - -= �• a E I = ARNESON ACRES PARK • i : I � EXISJMG TREE e *- o. _a. reach `� ~ 3 i• WESTSHORE TO CORNELIA _ +:�eA 4 • A e i A ' w- 1 y r 1 f .. -, i I_ '' I• j I ... EXISTING (TYPICAL) TREE i I ` t EXISTING TREE .- __._.-- �Tr ",.. �•:.:.._ - _..;, -. r,- - c -W 70TH ST - -- - - -- (TYPICAL► -- 'tom _ - r' J s � r f a 1 a ' - ( , 3 - - CORNELIA SCHOOL PARK 0 { y + a w � a j NTS A SEH Corridor Landscaoin 2of7 Concept - project area plan West 70th Street Edina. MN June 24, 2011 WEST - PROJECT AREA f ' i a LIA SCHOOL 0 EXISTING TREE 1 (TYPICAL) lk A SEH s i AREA P u ` rc• r r � f {.; i ,�. ♦ .,„- --�C'. �' - AREA H i 1 = W TOTH ST W 70TH ST - w �_ -_� LL a EXISTING TEE (TYPICAL) i I I AREAL. AREA K I z I _.; I a I •.� '.. . L m o a a ZN 0 NTS 3of7 Corridor Landscapina Concept - oroiect area plan West 70th Street Edino. MN June 24, 2011 0TH ST �J .4r W6TV Enlarged view of Areas B and C East of Highway 100 Section A -A NIOPUANInAI F PnAfl i I 0 ♦ *�� r .ter+ —• '. -� . . . . r#�'�.'siw_Mr'i!�R �' .���V.�R�_. -. Section B -B DESIGN NARRATIVE The landscape concept for the corridor is informed by the area's agricultural and neighborhood's horticultural history. It reflects the "ordered" patterns reminiscent of row planting. It is also inspired by the current residential boulevard gardens that celebrate the neighborhood. echo the gardens found in Arneson Acres Park, and create a beau- tiful and colorful edge along West 70th Street. Key features of the corridor landscape concept include: • A diverse palette of trees, shrubs, perennial flowers and ornamental native grasses, are repeated throughout the co -ridor to create a contiguous ribbon of seasonal color and texture • Gateway medians on the west side of West 70th Street (Areas A and B) hint of the existence of a midwestern prairie using horizontally branching hawthorn trees that are underplanted with little bluestem and prairie dropseed grasses • The "orchard" planting in rows of pink and white flowering crabapple trees near Nor - mandale and West 70th Street (Area C) are suggestive of Arneson tree farm plantations • A medley of evergreens (species to match existing vegetation), lilacs, roses, and perennials provide the visual "windbreak" between the church and West 70th Street (Area D) and enhance the existing gardens • Berm plantings of evergreens, lilacs, serviceberry and spirea (Areas E and J) pro- vide screening, traffic calming and seasonal beautification on the north and south sides of West 70th Street just west of the new roundabout • Low plantings of daylilies and native grasses in the medians on the west, north and east side of the roundabout (Areas F, H, and K) repeat the same patterns of colors and forms used near the church while reinforcing the traffic calming measures of the roundabout • Seasonal shrubs and the repeated use of daylilies along the area adjacent to the office building east of Valley View Rd (Area G) provide parking lot screening and traffic calming measures while continuing to weave the palette of plants used throughout the corridor • Three stone pillars of varying heights, colors and textures stand as sentinels to re- mind motorists to "slow down" as they make their way through the neighborhood. While serving an important function, they also provide a simple and natural element of beauty as unique characteristics are revealed through the honing, chiseling and polishing of their stone faces. • The concept also includes recommendations for street tree enhancements along the corridor with specific locations to be determined 4 o 7 Corridor Landscaping Concept - project design narrative . �e/ West 70th Street Edina. MN SEN June 24. 2010 SECTION i �J PLAN d®rt. S E H DESIGN NARRATIVE This concept presents three atone pillars grounded by the plantings of a potted prairie. Key features of the roundabout concept include: • Three granite pillars, illustrated in varying heights, colors and textures create a natural sculptural ele- ment within the roundabout. The concept is based on previous roundabout concepts using both a ver- tical and a natural stone element. • Granite is shown to celebrate both the urban resi- dential neighborhood and the boulders that once were taken from the surrounding fields. Its use cre- ates sculptural possibilities through the creative treatment of the stone's face. • Vines playfully intertwine about the stoic stones and are reminiscent of vines that grow about his- torical farm and church yard3. A potted prairie em- braces the stones with subtle grasses and bold na- tive flowers CHAF POTTED PRAIRIE PLANTING Sof7 Corridor Landscaping Concept - roundabout concept west 70th Street Edina. MN June 24, 2011 LITTLE GRAPETTE DAYLILY sax-':7 `� rl 1 1 k SEDUM CATMINT STELLA D'ORO DAYLILY RUBY STELLA DAYLILY LITTLE BLUESTEM GRASS PLANTS RUBY STELLA DAYLILY STELLA D'ORO DAYLILY LITTLE GRAPETTE DAYLILY LITTLE TITCH CATMINT AUTUMN FIRE SEDUM LITTLE BLUESTEM GRASS DESIGN NARRATIVE This planting option is shown as a 50 foot x 4 foot wide boulevard garden. The planting plan provides residents with a list of plants that is part of the corridor planting palette. Key features of the boulevard garden option: • Planting beds large encugh to provide ample room for drifts of color that would enhance both residence and corridor • Plants spaced to minimize weed competition. A va- riety of plant color, height and texture will create a natural appearance. Taller plants form the spine of the boulevard planting while shorter plants create a softer edge treatment • Plants selected for low maintainance and tolerance to typical street conditions M z ...�.&'.Cv _a�_ " .,v.. ,�� �.: s. ���,.:. � ads.... .. ;.... ".: ;_. •. i ern r o. ncc +vu re.cc LITTLE BLUESTEM GRASS PLAN 6of7 Corridor Landscaping Concept - boulevard planting option West 70th Street SEH Edina, MN June 24, 2010 _ PLANT PALETTE •:' ' " " a' r AREAS A& B - WESTERN MEDIANS THORNLESS HAWTHORN LITTLE BLUESTEM PRAIRIE DROPSEED r d k C 70TH E & TO TH PRAIR EF REERABAPP ��'�t 1• .. .''. '` RED SPLENDOR CRABAPPLE F.M SNOWDRIFT CRABAPPLE . r ' JAPANESE WHITE SPIREA IROQUOIS BEAUTY CHOKEBERRY � INCREDIBALL HYDRANGEA fi 1 AREA D -AT CHURCH LITTLE GRAPETTE DAYLILY STELLA DORODAYLILY SEDUM JAPANESE TREE LILAC, CLUMP BALSAM FIR BLACK HILLS SPRUCE I # Y COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE '; � I _ -� a t ' ! �� � .:$,4• { - � f CHAMPLAIN ROSE f WONDERBLUE LILAC RUBY STELLA DAYLILY r STELLA D'ORO DAYLILY LITTLE GRAPETTE DAYLILY LITTLE TITCH CATMINT �p. MIDNIGHT BLUE SALVIA �. AUTUMN FIRE SEDUM = AREAS E & J - BERMS BLACK HILLS SPRUCE J> AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICE BERRY .4 WONDERBLUE LILAC f JAPANESE WHITE SPIREA MIDNIGHT BLUE SALVIA CHAMPLAIN ROSE KARL FOERSTER GRASS PRAIRIE DROPSEED POTTED PRARNE FLOWERS AND GRACSES - ROUNDABOUT - PINK PARASOLS SPIREA NEON FLASH SPIREA I > AREAS F, H & K. ROUNDABOUT MEDIANS S LITTLE BLUESTEM Y q RUBY STELLA DAYLILY • `, , ,� , - � _ .- ., � '"r .. STELLA D'ORO DAYLILY LITTLE GRAPETTE DAYLILY = ' AREA G - ADJACENT TO OFFICE BLDG. t: IIROQUOIS BEAUTY CHOKEBERRY RUBY STELLA DAYLILY • ; ; " *� STELLA D'ORO DAYLILY LITTLE GRAPETTE DAYLILY AREA I - ROUNDABOUT CONCEPT D POTTED PRAIRIE PERENNIALS ' a A - 1 mks r s RECOMMENDED STREET TREES FRONTIER ELM ON FLMH JAPANESE WHITE SPIREA PINK PARASOLS SPIREA IROQUOIS BEAUTY CHDOWDOW WONDERBLUE LILAC EMERALD LUSTRE MAPLE SWAMP WHITE OAK qt r � � �W ��y .L' if. - }. ��� ' @r�,t�s, �4' }yf.�``.�� y:�,.�r K •�-Y,� '�� � •.{j. r S. 6 5 r - ' a7.- '; .' -. � "> � • ' ^.. �9,f�" �', fry M,�;�4� '. b. I r� u 4 , �i BLACK HILLS SPRUCE COLORADO BLUE SPRUCE SWAMP WHITE OAK EMERALD LUSTRE MAPLE WHITE CRABAPPLE PINK CRABAPPLE JAPANESE TREE LILAC 7of7 Corridor Landscaping Concept - plant palette recommendations west 70th Street SEH = Edina, MN June 24, 2011 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No: IV. E. From: Jesse Struve, PE Utility Engineer ® Action F-1 Discussion D Information Date: September 20, 2011 Subject: Resolution No. 2011 -90 Receive Feasibility Report and Support Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Stream Bank Restoration Project ACTION REQUESTED: Accept the feasibility report for Minnehaha Creek, Reach 14 Restoration and give support to Minnehaha Creek Watershed District to move forward with the project. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) staff initiated this project and the project is located between 54th Street and France Avenue in Edina. MCWD had a public meeting on July 24, 2011 to discuss the project and gauge interest from the residents along this stretch of Minnehaha Creek. The proposed project involves MCWD working with residents who volunteer to participate in the project to stabilize the stream bank, re- establishment of buffers next to the creek, and enhancement of in- stream habitat features in the creek. This is a completely voluntary project where MCWD will work directly with willing property owners to do improvements along the creek. All funding for this project will come from MCWD and no city funds will be used. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution 2011 -90 Feasibility Report for Minnehaha Creek — Reach 14 Restoration Results of a Survey sent to residents along this stretch of Minnehaha Creek. G: \PW \INFRAS \AGENCIES \WATERSHED DISTRICTS \MINNEHAHA CREEK \20110920 MCWD report and recommendation.docx RESOLUTION NO. 2011-90 w91NA, RECEIVE FEASIBILITY REPORT o� e, AND SUPPORT MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT En STREAM BANK RESTORATION PROJECT Nov 4� 3y rlcosrox>'9 - eee City of Edina WHEREAS, at the request of Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) a feasibility report was created for the stream bank restoration, buffer re- establishment, and enhancement of in- stream habitat features of a portion of Minnehaha Creek between 54th Street and France Avenue in Edina; and WHEREAS, the Edina City Council values the natural resources within the City of Edina; and WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding. MCWD designating this section as a target area for improvements in their 2004 Stream Assessment due to the poor condition of the riparian zone; and WHEREAS, this project seeks residents of Edina to volunteer to participate in the program to allow MCWD to make improvements to the stream and stream bank in front of their property; and WHEREAS, many of the residents in this area have expressed interest to volunteer and participate in the stream bank restoration project; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the City Council hereby supports the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District's stream bank restoration, buffer re- establishment, and enhancement of in- stream habitat features of a portion of Minnehaha Creek between 54th Street and France Avenue in Edina. ADOPTED this 20th day of September, 2011. - Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James, B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF-HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 20, 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com City Clerk 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 -826 -0390 TTY 952- 826 -0379 inter fluve Minnehaho Creek in Edina — Photo by Inter -Fluve �a MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT inter fluve DRAFT FEASIBILITY REPORT Minnehaha Creek Reach 14 Restoration Submitted to Rebecca Houdek MCWD Planner 18202 Minnetonka Blvd. Deephaven, MN, 55391 KA WAIIlT7Er 0!3 Submitted b), Inter- Fluve, Inc. PiznnriJ- Contrz�l: Marty Melchior Inter - Fluve, Inc. 3602 Atwood Avenue, Suite 3 Madison, WI 53714 Main: (608) 441 -0342 Cell: (608) 354 -8260 Email: mmelchior @interfluve.com August 16 `h, 2011 INTRODUCTION Introduction The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District retained Inter -Fluve to examine existing conditions in Reach 14 of Minnehaha Creek and to recommend alternatives for improving the geomorphic and ecological health of the reach. Inter -Fluve has conducted a preliminary site walk to date, but detailed survey information could not be collected due to high water conditions. In the paragraphs below, we describe the historic condition of the channel and discuss how the project reach has changed since Inter -Fluve conducted the previous geomorphic assessment in May 2004. Recommendations and examples are given for riparian zone and in -stream habitat improvement. Historic Conditions Through Edina, pre - settlement Minnehaha Creek was a highly meandering low gradient stream with abundant forested wetlands adjacent to the channel. Remnants of these wetlands still exist in nearby Pamela Park, Meadowbrook Lake and Lake Cornelia. The 1850 Government Land ►! i ' . L . i IC B �j X•I R X I L+' T . Office map shows the channel roughly in its present location re 1). Note+ _ that channel meanders in these maps • were generalized and not reflective of .- 'Gi /.c - +• - -�; the actual channel planform. The area was primarily agricultural or scrubland until the late 1930s, when the first housing was developed (Figure 2). By 1957, the area was largely developed � •, _ _ � ��, ___ __ `_: �«! 3 } and most of the existing roadwork completed (Figure 3). Figure 1— Map of Reach 14 from the 1850 Government Land Office Survey Figure 2 (left) — Aerial photograph of Minnehaha Creek Reach 14 in 1938. France Avenue dissects the photo right of center. Note there is no connection to Pamela Park wetlands in the bottom left of the photo. Note also the lack of forested canopy in the upstream segment of the reach. Figure 3 (right) — Aerial photograph of Minnehaha Creek Reach 14 in 1957. Note some filling of the channel has occurred on the left side of the photo just downstream of 54`h Street West, and the creek has been channelized upstream of 54 `h Street. Figure 4 - Minnehaha Creek Reach 14 stationing (From Inter -Fluve 2004 study). Stream flows from top left to bottom right (France Avenue). Existing Conditions The previous study divided Reach 14 into two distinct subreaches based primarily on riparian vegetation management (Figure 4). From France Ave. upstream past 561h Street West to Station 503 +00, the channel is highly managed with varying degrees of vegetation ranging from forest along the south bank to riprap and turfgrass maintained to the water's edge near 561b Street. Riprap banks are used intensively from W 56th Street to 503 +00 (Figure 5). From France Ave to W 56th Street, the channel is not stabilized with hard engineering but has widened relative to upstream and downstream reaches. Upstream of 503 +00, the riparian zone and channel assume a high quality, natural appearance. In the 2004 assessment, small alternate lateral bar deposits were observed in the upstream and downstream most reaches, and none Figure 5 — Aerial photo of Minnehaha Creek upstream of 56`h Street west between Woodcrest Drive and Woodland Circle. Stream flow is from right to left in the picture. were observed in the intensive riprap segment, indicating that the upstream dam and Meadowbrook Lake are sediment sinks, and that whatever fine sediment (silt and sand) enters the channel is transported through the reach, with some fines depositing downstream of 56th Street where the channel widens. Mid- channel deposition of fines was noted from 50 to 100 ft. downstream of W. 56th Street, and this has been reported in recent years by the City of Edina. Only minor areas of erosion were observed in this reach, as was reported in 2004. Banks were either stabilized by large riprap or naturally by rooted woody vegetation. Some minor erosion is noted where toe treatment is minimal combined with turfgrass management to the stream edge. Bankfull width from France Ave. to 503 +00 varied from 22 feet to over 40 feet due to floodplain fill, dredging, riprap or other human influence. In the undisturbed area upstream of 503 +00, bankfull width is slightly larger, with 2004 values reported from 33 to 43 feet. There is no evidence of active downcutting, although detailed inspection could not be conducted due to high water. Channel bed material and depositional features will be examined when water levels drop. The lower limit of woody vegetation and consistent water stain line indicate regular flows approximately 1.5 to 2.0 feet below the top of bank. Flow at the time of the initial survey was just below bankfull. Channel top of bank is still the only consistent indicator of channel forming flow in Reach 14, but much of the reach is hard armored. Riparian Vegetation and Floodplain — The 2004 study said this about the riparian area, "Reach 14 upstream of 503 +00 has an average canopy cover of approximately 65 %, due to extremely large, mature cottonwood and boxelder. Woody /shrub root coverage of the banks is approximately 90% in the wooded segment. Downstream of 503 +00, canopy coverage is extremely poor at <5% and root coverage is 0% through the riprap area." This condition has not changed since the previous study was completed. Conclusions and recommendations Fish and wildlife habitat in Reach 14 is extremely poor downstream of the forested segment. Riprap and turfgrass management creates a transitional barrier for wildlife such as reptiles and amphibians, and prevents the growth of native vegetation. Lack of shading increases thermal heating and limits the available habitat and protective cover important for birds and other wildlife. Fish habitat is limited by low flow conditions in winter and dry summers, lack of residual pool habitat and lack of cover. Stream flow cannot be appreciably affected by any action in Reach 14, and major changes in planform or geomorphology such as floodplain excavation or channel meandering are not possible given the amount of urban encroachment. Our recommendations for restoration include the two channel characteristics most easily manipulated in this setting, riparian vegetation management and in -stream habitat. Riparian vegetation management - The riparian corridor, or the vegetative buffer surrounding the stream edge, is of high quality in the upstream third of Reach 14, but suffers from urban turf management in the lower two thirds. This is perhaps the most important feature of Reach 14, because it is the only variable that can be significantly changed by the action of local residents. The river systems of the world provide important migratory connections between watersheds and natural areas. Energy stored in plant matter, nutrients, carbon storage and habitat formation are all important green corridor processes that form the underlying fabric of biology. In urban areas, where impervious surfaces (asphalt, concrete, buildings) and turfgrass have replaced natural communities, riverine corridors are often the largest contiguous natural areas (Figure 6). Urban Figure 6 — In Plymouth, Massachusetts, the turfgrass edge of Town Brook in historic Brewster Park was replaced by a native grass, forb and shrub buffer. Landscaping plants were used to transition into the park setting (photo Inter- Fluve) landuse disconnects other forests and wetlands along the river corridor and such areas are likely a behavioral barrier for migrating birds and wildlife. By improving the health and increasing the width of green river corridors, we can improve the connectivity of available natural habitats. Thus, Reach 14 could be greatly improved by a cooperative effort among private homeowners along the creek. Even a small buffer width of native vegetation varying from 10 to 20 feet would allow for shrub and tree growth and understory cover, creating a contiguous green corridor (Figure 7). Further analysis will determine whether or not shear stresses in the reach warrant large riprap and will determine the height at which any hard armor should be placed. Based on the results of the original survey in 2004, it is probable that smaller rock sizes (6 -10 inch diameter) can be used or that full bioengineering approaches will be sufficient. The upstream segment of the reach has no hard armor, yet is the most stable segment of the reach. Woody vegetation in this section provides adequate stabilization of the channel boundary. Any buffer can be landscaped to transition into a more managed turf environment. Figure 7 — A recommended buffer between managed turfgrass and the stream edge would be a minimum of 10 feet. The wider the buffer, the more ecological benefit to the water quality in Minnehaha Creek. Native grasses provide deep roots that can stabilize channel banks. Native grass buffers filter out commonly used lawn fertilizer, help to infiltrate stormwater runoff, and help to minimize goose impacts. Geese do not cross native buffers, and will seek out areas where turfgrass meets the water's edge, thus avoiding naturally grown buffers. For the properties along Reach 14, appropriate species would be tolerant of wet soils that can occasionally dry out during dry summers. Mesic prairie mixes have been developed by the State of Minnesota, and Inter -Fluve recommends the following mix containing a variety of native grasses and wildflowers. Table 1— Recommended Minnehaha Creek - Reach 14 Seed Mix (MNDOT Riparian South /West Mix) SCIENTIFIC NAME GRASSES: Beckmannia syzigachne Elymus riparius Elymus virginicus Glyceria grandis Glyceria striata Leersia oryzoides Poa palustris Spartina pectinata SEDGES & RUSHES: COMMON NAME American Sloughgrass Riverbank Wild Rye Virginia Wild Rye Reed Manna Grass Fowl Manna Grass Rice Cut Grass Fowl Bluegrass Prairie Cord Grass Carex scoparia Pointed -broom Sedge Carex stricta Tussock Sedge Carex vulpinoidea Brown Fox Sedge Juncus tenuis Path Rush Scirpus atrovirens Green Bulrush Scirpus cyperinus Woolgrass FORBS: Asclepias incarnate Swamp Milkweed Eupatorium maculatum Joe Pye Weed Eupatorium perfoliatum Boneset Helenium autumnale Sneezeweed Helianthus giganteus Giant Sunflower Impatiens capensis Spotted Touch -me -not Lobelia siphilitica Great Blue Lobelia Mimulus ringens Monkey Flower Pycnanthemum virginianum Mountain Mint Rudbeckia laciniata Wild Golden Glow Solidago gigantean Giant Goldenrod Verbena hastate Blue Vervain Vernonia fasciculate Common Ironweed COVER CROP: Annual Rye and Oats Plugs are small potted wetland plants, similar in size to the spring vegetable plants commonly found at local garden centers. Plugs are an excellent way of quickly establishing keystone plants that can be difficult to grow from seed. For instance, in addition to the priairie mix above, plugs of little bluestem, chord grass, sedges and other forbs could be scattered or clustered within the planting area. Native shrubs and trees can provide even better soil stability due to the density of their root systems. Many native flowering shrubs can be trimmed regularly and thus managed for shape and viewscapes. Native trees provide the important overstory habitat for birds, provide shade to keep streams cool, and provide far reaching and dense root systems for stabilizing bank soils. With some species, such as black willow, a single large tree can provide up over 40 feet of erosion proof bank. Inter -Fluve recommends the following species for use in Reach 14 riparian plantings: Table 2 — Native Shrubs and Trees NUMBER SHRUBS: TREES: Red osier dogwood Eastern cottonwood Grey dogwood Black willow Common elderberry Silver maple Ninebark American elm Nannyberry Swamp white oak Pussy willow Cedar Snowberry Sugar maple High bush cranberry 100 each Any non - native tree that provides shade can be planted, but the advantage of native trees is that they provide food (eg. nuts, berries) and shelter to species adapted to them. Non - native species may provide shade, but may not provide other benefits. Although native shrubs and trees are preferred, other non - invasive decorative species could potentially provide some of the benefits of native plants. For example, weeping willow is a common decorative tree that tluives in near shore environments but is not endemic to the region. Weeping willow grows exceptionally fast and provides unmatched bank stabilization. We recommend panting larger stock in 7 gallon pots or as balled and burlap trees. Large potted stock can cost between $80 to $250 per installed tree, depending on the type and size. Larger trees can be installed, but they are expensive and difficult to install larger than 10 gallons. Balled and burlap trees from 2 -4" caliper will cost $300 - $2,000 installed depending on the tree. Trees and shrubs can be planted along with native seed mixes, and woody plant density can vary depending on individual landowner desires. For a typical 100 foot long shoreline, we provide below an example plant list for a 15 foot wide buffer: Table 3 — Example planting plan PLANT NUMBER MNDOT riparian SW seed mix 35 lb/acre Red osier dogwood 3 Grey dogwood 2 Common elderberry 1 right edge Ninebark 2 High bush cranberry 1 left edge Silver Maple 1 center left Weeping willow 1 right edge Grass / forb plugs 100 each Plantings can be staggered or clustered to create viewscapes and access areas. We have included some Photoshop renderings of potential buffer expansion along a few properties in Reach 14. These are meant to depict general appearance, but actual plans could be dramatically different and can be tailored to landowner's specific requests (Appendix). The entire disturbed area would be seeded and covered with mulch or erosion control blanket. Plants could then be brought in and installed according to the individual landowner's instruction, following guidelines established between the landowner and the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. All woody species will need to be protected from beaver, vole and rabbit damage, which would include a wire cage for the first few years, followed by a wire mesh just around tree trunks. This can be relatively invisible, small gauge hardwire cloth. Channel stabikZation — Hydraulic engineering calculations made based on stream survey data from 2004 indicate that much of the riprap used to protect the channel margin from erosion may be substantially oversized. The reach has a slope of 0.003 ft /ft or 0.3 %, and regularly moves only sediment of approximately 1.0 inches in size. At near the bankfull stage or slightly above, the channel has an average shear stress of only 0.43 lb /ft2, much lower than that required to move large riprap, and larger even that that needed to move small cobbles. Large riprap creates a significant barrier between the aquatic and terrestrial habitats, making it difficult or impossible for amphibians, reptiles and other animals to connect with the creek. The large riprap could be replaced with smaller diameter stone and a bioengineering bank stabilization approach whereby plantings are integrated into the lower toe stone to create a more passable boundary. This work could be completed where riparian areas will already be temporarily disturbed by plantings, and so no additional disturbance would be needed. In- stream habitat — In areas with wide natural buffers, where the channel is allowed to naturally migrate back and forth across its floodplain, various habitat features are possible such as wood installation, riffle and pool construction and boulder placement. In Reach 14, the channel is slightly narrower than in other reaches, and the riparian zone is heavily managed. The only practical in -stream habitat option is the installation of boulder clusters or individual boulder placement to provide small scour pools while still appearing natural and not impacting flood elevations. While riparian areas are being disturbed and replanted, small excavating equipment could be used to install 1 -2 ft diameter boulders, thus minimizing disturbance. Boulders would be dug into the channel bed and would be submerged during average flows. Maintenance — Native plantings require intensive short term maintenance, but near zero long term maintenance. Short term management includes weeding, possible mowing and protection of trees and shrubs from animal damage. The most important aspect of long -term native plant management is removal of invasive weeds and shrubs. Garlic mustard, reed canarygrass, crabgrass, creeping Charlie, buckthorn and honeysuckle are the most common invasive weeds in Minneapolis -St. Paul metro area riparian corridors. If left unchecked, these plants can take over a site and eliminate native species. With just minor maintenance, a healthy streamside buffer can transform managed turfgrass into a natural buffer that filters pollutants, encourages infiltration, lowers stream temperatures, and provides valuable habitat for riparian fish and wildlife. Appendix Minneha a Creek Reach 14 lllllllligllllqll'lllilill 1111111 lljllllm;;111�� III SURVEY RESULTS — This indicates how people replied to the survey sent out by Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Minnehaha Creek Reach 14 Streambank Improvement Project Survey Resident name: Address: Project summary: The MCWD is proposing a streambank improvement project along Minnehaha Creek from West 54th Street to France Avenue in the City of Edina. The project would be on a strictly voluntary basis and would involve the installation of native plants along the streambank for the purposes of preventing bank erosion, improving water quality, and enhancing wildlife habitat. Please complete the survey by circling the applicable response or filling in the blank provided. 1. What is the current condition of your streambank? Turf grass to the water's edge Riprap (rock) or retaining wall Natural vegetation 4 12 11 2. Are you interested in participating in the proposed streambank restoration project? Yes No (skip to #13) Maybe 11 8 4 3. Is your streambank primarily in the sun or shade? Sun Shade 9 10 4. How steep is your existing streambank? (Note — 3:1 means 3 ft horizontal to 1 ft vertical) Less than 3:1 Greater than 3:1 Not sure 10 4 3 5. The proposed plantings would consist primarily of native grasses with some flowers, shrubs, and /or trees depending on resident preferences. Enclosed is a proposed seed mix with a list of shrubs and trees on the back side. If you have preferences for the types of plants to be used, please note these on the list. 6. The proposed design includes a 10 -20 ft buffer of native plantings that would provide water quality and habitat benefits. MCWD's goal would be to have a buffer that is at least 20 ft wide on average. What is the maximum buffer width that you could accommodate on your property? ft 3, 3 -5, 5, 5 -7, 6, 15, 15 -20, 15 -20, 20, 20, 20, 30 7. The proposed design would include a path where mowing would be allowed to provide access to the creek; however, a narrow path of 5 -10 ft in width would be preferred. How wide of an access path would you want to have on your property? ft 0,0,0,0,3,5,5,5,5,5,6,5 - 8,10,10 8. If you have existing rock or a retaining wall on your streambank, would you be willing to allow it to be removed and replaced with native plantings? Yes No Not applicable 1 3 9 9. The level of funding for this project will be set by the MCWD Board of Managers in September. It is expected that MCWD will provide somewhere between 75 -100% of the total cost of design, construction, and the first 3 -5 years of maintenance. The exact level of funding will depend on the number of residents involved and the expected.water resource benefits. If necessary, would you be Willing to contribute to the cost of the improvements on your property? Yes, up to. %or$ No 8:- $90'$300,10% �0 -20% 25% or $1000,25%,25%, 50% 6 10. If the MCWD provides the first 3 -5 years of maintenance to get the plants established, would you be willing to provide the long -term maintenance of the plantings? (Note — native plantings generally require very little maintenance once established.) Yes No 13 1 11. As with all MCWD projects, some type of agreement or declaration would be needed to provide for the maintenance and protection of the project (e.g. prevent mowing of the new plantings). Would you be willing to enter into such an agreement? Yes No Not sure 13 1 1 12. If:you are interested in participating in this project, what is your primary reason(s)? a. Reduce erosion 9 b. Improve water quality 9 c. Provide wildlife habitat 6 d. Deter geese 2 e. Visual appeal 9 f. Other: 13. If you are not interested in participating in the project, please indicate your primary concern(s): a. Loss of usable yard space 7 b. Appearance of native plantings 3 c. Blocked views of or access to creek 7 d. Maintenance responsibilities 2 e. Potential costs 3 f. Requirement for protective agreement over planting area 2 g. Other: Just installed riprap 2 vrs ago. House is for sale. Already have garden of shrubs and hostas that is wildlife friendly and organic and have mossy area instead of grass Thank you very much for completing this survey! Please use the enclosed postage -paid envelope to "d return the survey by Monday, August 22 . J owed, cn • INroRPOPA�4'O� 1888 AGENDA ITEM V. A. Hennepin County Update Commissioner Jan Callison No packet data Oral presentation Information coming ok1►e REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item Item No. VII.A. From: Debra Mangen City Clerk ® Action ❑ Discussion ❑ Information Date: September 20, 2011 Subject: Resolution No. 2011 -89 Accepting Various Donations ACTION REQUESTED: Adopt Resolution. INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: In order, to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. ATTACHMENT: Resolution No. 2011 -89 RESOLUTION NO. 2011 -89 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA City of Edina WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Edina Art Center: Edina Community Foundation $1,258.00 Bicycle Mosaic Sculpture Promenade Bill Lord $50.00 Suzanne Selig $500.00 Edina Braemar Golf Course Kopp Family Foundation $1,000.00 Dated: September 20, 2011 Attest: . Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK Luann Rosenthal- Erickson Linda Jacobs Cynthia Fleury $30.00 $100.00 Picture Frame James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 20, 2011, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of City Clerk City Hall 952 -927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.CityofEdina.com TTY 952 - 826 0379 ^rte ow e 0 . BB REPORURECOMMEN RATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VIII. DEBRA MANGEN Action From: CITY CLERK ❑ Discussion M Information Date: SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED SINCE LAST COUNCIL MEETING INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received since the last Council meeting. Susan Howl From: Jordan Gilgenbach Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 4:17 PM To: Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Joni Bennett; Josh Sprague; Mary Brindle Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Edina Construction U CEP V E© - -' Jordan Gilgenbach, Communications Coordinator SEP 16 2011 "(. !77 ,' 952 - 826 -0396 i Fax 952 - 826 -0389 i Cell 612 - 363 -3564 3ioiloenbachaci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com -" ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doingg Business - - - - _ _ From: Ruth Melcher [ mailto:ruthmelcher @comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 10:40 AM To: Jordan Gilgenbach; Cary Teague Subject: Edina Construction To: City Council Members I read recently in the Sun Current that the city is looking at neighborhood construction - related issues and I wanted to give some input on parking problems. I live at 4624 Bruce Ave and often find my driveway partially or completely blocked by construction, lawn care or delivery vehicles. Sometimes this happens 2 -3 times a day, sometimes for a short periods, other times for hours. Sometimes they park correctly; but then leave the back truck gate open into my driveway. Sometimes they park just a few feet into my driveway and I've been concerned that my teenagers would scrape the side of my car on someone's back bumper. The mind - boggling part is that they usually have other options. Just yesterday I had a heated argument with a driver who completely blocked my driveway when all he had to do was back up a few feet into the large parking spot in front of my house. Another time I came home with groceries to a blocked driveway. I tracked down the driver, next door, and asked him to pull up a few feet, toward the driveway where he was working. After much resistance, including him informing me that he could park anywhere he wanted on a public street, he finally moved his truck. Once I was headed out to. an appointment only to find a large, heavy piece of equipment sitting at the end of my driveway, with no owner in sight. If drivers would politely request to use the space in front my driveway in order to to complete some task, and they clearly had no other options, of course I would do my best to accommodate them. Not all contractors cause these problems. For instance, Lon Oberpriller's company had a big job across the street for the better part of a year and there were no incidents. Thanks for hearing me out! Ruth Melcher 952 - 920 -3061 Susan Howl From: Jordan Gilgenbach Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 4:17 PM To: Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Joni Bennett; Josh Sprague; Mary Brindle V r D Cc: Susan Howl Subject: Fw: More on parking SEP 16 2011 Jordan Gilgenbach, Communications Coordinator 952 -826 -0396 1 Fax 952-826-03891 Cell 612- 363 -3564 www.CitvofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Ruth Melcher [ mailto:ruthmelcher @comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, September 15, 20114:06 PM To: Jordan Gilgenbach; Cary Teague Subject: More on parking Hi, Another truck blocked my driveway today, but left before the police could get here. The driver was someone I spoke with before about this very thing and, again, there was a spot available directly behind him. I think these guys know they have a window of opportunity before the police come. I asked the police if we could take photos of vehicles blocking our driveway and they said that wouldn't do any good. Maybe some kind of policy could be developed on that, where a photo could result in a ticket. Thanks, Ruth Melcher Susan Howl From: Julia Parenteau [mailto:juliap @mplsrealtor.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 14, 2011 10:30 AM R [ C E PV E [l_Jj To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Edina Housing Statistics - August 2011 SEP 14 2011 Good Morning Mayor Hovland and Members of the Council - - -- - - - --" - - Attached please find the most recent housing statistics from the Minneapolis Area Association of REALTORS®, for the City of Edina and the Twin Cities metro area as a whole. These reports describe our market in August 2011. Please let me know if you have any questions. As a reminder, if you are interested in seeing more in -depth statistics and figures for your city, or other cities and counties in the metro — please feel free to check out our online statistical reports at www.mplsrealtor.com. The Thing, our interactive market analytics tool, is very useful, as it offers many choices of variables for your review. Check it out here: http : / /thething.mplsrealtor.com/ (September 13, 2011) —The Twin Cities housing market took a few careful strides toward recovery in August. Sellers brought 6,144 new listings to the market, down 10.7 percent from last year. Buyers entered into 4,358 purchase agreements, up 46.4 percent above the post -tax credit lull of August 2010. Inventory levels dropped to 23,502 active listings, representing 21.4 percent fewer than last year and the largest year - over -year decline in nearly seven years. Said Brad Fisher, President of the Minneapolis Area Association of REALTORS ®, "Less inventory means less competition among sellers in a marketplace slowly transitioning from the buyer's favor to one of balance." Absorption rates — often a precursor to price movement — showed improvement for the second consecutive month. There are currently 7.1 months supply of inventory, which is just outside of the ideal range of 5 to 6 months often used as the measure for a balance between supply and demand. That's down 18.9 percent from last August and marks both the largest decline and lowest level in 18 months. On the foreclosure front, the share of all closed sales that were foreclosure or short sales (lender- mediated) decreased to 38.0 percent —the lowest level in 14 months. The share of all new listings that were lender- mediated increased slightly to 33.4 percent. The fact that relatively more homes in financial distress are selling off the market than are entering the market is still a positive sign. Julia Parenteau Public Affairs Director Minneapolis Area Association of REALTORS® p. (952) 988 -3124 e. iuliap @mplsrealtor.com A The 200+ 2010 Housing Market Updates for the Twin Cities AREA Association MINNEAPOLIS �r REALTORS` 2010 -8.4% +7.7% +14.8% +/- ---------------------------------------- Change in Change in Change in Edina New Listings- - - - - - Closed Sales - - - Median Sales Price - - - - August Year to Date Does not account for seller concessions. I Activity for one month can sometimes look extreme due to small sample size. August u2010 ■ 2011 Year to Date 131 12� 1,062 -8.4% +7.7% New Listings Closed Sales 2010 ■ 2011 nAA -11.1 % +1.6% New Listings Closed Sales Twin Cities Region Edina !010 1 -2011 7 -2011 Each dot represents the change in median sales price from the prior year using a 6 -month weighted average. This means that each of the 6 months used in a dot are proportioned according to their share of sales during that period. I Current as of September 13, 2011. All data from Regional Multiple Listing Service, Inc. i Powered by 10K Research and Marketing. i Sponsored by Royal Credit Union - www.rcu.org 2010 2011 +/- 2010 2011 +/- New Listings 131 120 -8.4% 1,062 944 - 11.1% Closed Sales 65 70 +7.7% 438 445 +1.6% Median Sales Price* $320,000 $367,500 +14.8% $346,000 $353,000 +2.0% Average Sales Price* $440,751 $430,943 -2.2% $420,619 $446,544 +6.2% Price Per Square Foot* $212 $211 -0.4% $213 $211 -0.9% Percent of Original List Price Received* 89.4% 91.5% +2.4% 91.1% 90.6% -0.5% Days on Market Until Sale 140 132 -6.0% 157 150 -4.6% Inventory of Homes for Sale 529 472 -10.8% -- -- -- Months Supply of Inventory 9.6 8.5 -12.1% I -- -- -- Does not account for seller concessions. I Activity for one month can sometimes look extreme due to small sample size. August u2010 ■ 2011 Year to Date 131 12� 1,062 -8.4% +7.7% New Listings Closed Sales 2010 ■ 2011 nAA -11.1 % +1.6% New Listings Closed Sales Twin Cities Region Edina !010 1 -2011 7 -2011 Each dot represents the change in median sales price from the prior year using a 6 -month weighted average. This means that each of the 6 months used in a dot are proportioned according to their share of sales during that period. I Current as of September 13, 2011. All data from Regional Multiple Listing Service, Inc. i Powered by 10K Research and Marketing. i Sponsored by Royal Credit Union - www.rcu.org The 200+ Housing Market Updates for the Twin Cities Twin Cities Region August Year to Date 2010 2011 MINNEAPOLIS AREA Association of REALTORS` -10.7% +40.2% -10.9% Changein Changein Changein New Listings --- ------------- Closed Sales Median Sales Price ------------ ------ - - - - -- August Year to Date Does not account for seller concessions. I Activity for one month can sometimes look extreme due to small sample size. August !-,2010 ■ 2011 Year to Date 6,884 61,156 - - 6,144 1 51,235 i� 2010 ■ 2011 +11.7% Closed Sales Twin Cities Region Twin Cities Region •rr� 7 -2010 1 -2011 7 -2011 " Each dot represents the change in median sales price from the prior year using a 6 -month weighted average. This means that each of the 6 months used in a dot are proportioned according to their share of sales s during that period. I Current as of September 13, 2011. All data from Regional Multiple Listing Service, Inc. I Powered by 10K Research and Marketing. I Sponsored by Royal Credit Union ` �� www.rcu.org 2010 2011 +/- 2010 2011 +/- New Listings 6,884 6,144 -10.7% 61,156 51,235 -16.2% Closed Sales 2,954 4,142 +40.2% 26,764 27,222 +1.7% Median Sales Price* $175,000 $156,000 -10.9% $171,000 $152,560 -10.8% Average Sales Price* $222,269 $204,351 -8.1% $211,674 $195,317 -7.7% Price Per Square Foot* $136 $125 -8.2% $136 $122 -10.7% Percent of Original List Price Received* 91.0% 91.2% +0.2% 93.1% 90.4% -3.0% Days on Market Until Sale 127 136 +7.4% 125 146 +16.7% Inventory of Homes for Sale 29,910 23,502 -21.4% -- -- -- Months Supply of Inventory 8.8 7.1 -18.9% 1 -- -- -- Does not account for seller concessions. I Activity for one month can sometimes look extreme due to small sample size. August !-,2010 ■ 2011 Year to Date 6,884 61,156 - - 6,144 1 51,235 i� 2010 ■ 2011 +11.7% Closed Sales Twin Cities Region Twin Cities Region •rr� 7 -2010 1 -2011 7 -2011 " Each dot represents the change in median sales price from the prior year using a 6 -month weighted average. This means that each of the 6 months used in a dot are proportioned according to their share of sales s during that period. I Current as of September 13, 2011. All data from Regional Multiple Listing Service, Inc. I Powered by 10K Research and Marketing. I Sponsored by Royal Credit Union ` �� www.rcu.org I1 ® League of Women Voters of Edina The public is invited to League of Women Voters Edina Fall meetings. Find more information at lwvedina. ors or L WVE on facebook. September International Speakers Thursday, September 8, Edina Grandview Library, 9:45 a.m. "Iran and the Persian Gu1P', Dr. William Beeman, University of Minnesota Saturday, September 10, Edina City Hall, 9:45 a.m. "Tunisia, Egypt and Libya ", Dr. Imed Labidi, University of Minnesota October The Role of the Federal Government in Public Education Thursday, October 13, Edina Grandview Library, 9:45 a.m. Saturday, October 15, Edina City Hall, 9:45 a.m. November Voter I.D. Thursday, November 10, Edina Grandview Library, 9:45 a.m. Saturday, November 12, Edina City Hall, 9:45 a.m. Susan Howl From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 10:06 AM Subject: August website statistics Good morning! Activity on the City of Edina website reflected the following activity during the month of August 2011: Total visits: 113,909 Number of visitors: 48,338 Total number of hits: 3,336,023 Average time of each visit: 9 minutes, 54 seconds Total page views: 270,255 Average page views per day: 8,717 Busiest day of the month: Aug. 22 with 147,989 hits The most visited page was City Manager Scott Neal's blog, with 6,554 visits. Other top pages included the following (with number of visits): Edina Aquatic Center — 4,625 Job Listings — 4,253 Edina Aquatic Center General Information — 3,042 Edina Aquatic Center Hours — 2,089 Administration & Jobs —1,909 Edina Aquatic Center Rates — 1,870 Police Department -- 1,844 Permits &.Applications -- 1,779 Telephone Numbers & Contacts —1,755 The most frequently accessed PDF among visitors was the summer Bike Plan, which was downloaded 4,196 times. Other frequently downloaded files included the following (with number of downloads): Employment application — 2,971 Brochure for new and prospective employees — 2,535 Edina Promenade design plan — 2,004 Centennial Lakes Park summer entertainment calendar —1,935 Park & Recreation Activities Directory -- 1,876 West 70th Street Landscaping Concepts —1,697 2011 Budget —1,135 Chapter 4 of Comprehensive Plan — 941 Community Street Map -- 814 Ecommerce totaled $9,114 in August. Top sales were Art Center classes, $4,680; Adventure Peak birthday parties, $2,656.72; Art Center memberships, $688; ventilation cleaning permits, $640; skating class registration at Braemar Arena, $580; and dog licenses, $522. Online registration for skating classes at Braemar Arena was made available for the first time on Aug. 25. We have been streaming video on our website through Granicus for several years. The most requested videos on Granicus August were the Aug. 3 City Council meeting, 86 views; August- September episode of "Beyond the Badge," 63 views; Aug. 16 City Council meeting, 58; August episode of "Agenda: Edina," 52; August episode of "In Edina," 50; Saver's Switch PSA, 23; Aug. 9 Park Board meeting, 20; Aug. 17 Planning Commission meeting and Kids Voting Recap from 2008, 15; and Aug. 30 City Council work session and Aug. 18 Rotary Club of Edina meeting, 10. We have been streaming all programming on YouTube since Jan. 1. We recently discovered that our YouTube viewing statistics are greatly different than those for Granicus. The most requested videos on YouTube in August were the Edina Police Department overview video, 132 views; Saver's Switch PSA, 111; August episode of "Agenda: Edina," 109; Braemar Golf Course commercial, 91; Edina government employment PSA, 89; Aug. 25 Rotary Club of Edina meeting, 86; Welcome to Edina video, 85; Braemar Golf Dome "Fred" commercial, 81; and August- September episode of "Beyond the Badge," 70. The City has a general Facebook page and pages for all of its enterprise facilities. The City has 5,036 "fans." Edinborough Park has 1,040 "fans." Edina Aquatic Center has 294. The Edina Art Center has 280. Centennial Lakes Park has 272. Braemar Golf Course has 230. Braemar Arena has 165. Edina Liquor has 124. It is believed that the facilities' additional social media presence has driven increased traffic to their websites. Though the website has grown substantially in the past year, interest still needs to be generated among the public. To gain that interest and generate more hits, please attempt to include the Uniform Resource Locator (URL), www.CityofEdina.com, on all correspondence. Please continue to tell others about our website and think about ways to improve it. If you have suggestions or questions, please contact me. Thanks! Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications & Marketing Director lip, . '1)"•1 952-833-9520 I Fax 952 - 826 -0389 J Ben nerotte(fti.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com. ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Monday, September 12, 2011 8:38 AM Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Weekly Correspondence about Local Politics g y L 011 Lynette Biunno, Receptionist 952-927-88611 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(@ci.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com _ --�- "�' -' ...For Living. Learning, Raising Families & Doing 3 ISi Hess c From: Alex Van Gorp [mailto:vangorpalex @yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, September 11, 2011 1:25 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Weekly Correspondence about Local Politics Dear City Council, My name is Alex Van Gorp and I am a writer for Zephyrus, the newspaper at Edina High School. As part of my job on the paper, I was assigned to keep track of local politics for possible stories or articles in the paper. I was hoping to establish some sort of weekly correspondence with one or more members of the City Council, and possibly be able to interview them in the future if a story involved our local government. Thank you very much, -Alex Van Gorp Susan Howl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 12:10 PM To: Scott Neal On EC E O V E Cc: Susan Howl Subject: FW: Solar Programs Update SED 0 8 2011 i Hello there, This message has been forwarded to the Mayor and Council members and Scott Neal. Lynette Biunno, Receptionist V. 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 Ibiunno(fti.edina.mn.us I www.CityofEdina.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Richard Carter [mailto:richard @greenenergycafe.com] Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 10:38 AM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Solar Programs Update I was just watching your City Council Meeting of August 16`h, 2001 online. Specific to the discussion of the funding, R01, and breakeven of the City Hall Solar System, I thought I would pass along one data point that I did not hear mentioned in the discussion. That data is covered in this Star Tribune article of August 22 "d: http://www.startribune.com /business /128217968.html In overview, it appears from your Council Meeting, that the calculations done by the Consultant, depended on Xcel Energy's Solar Rewards Program. As the article points out, this year's program has been exhausted. Just thought you should be aware of that. Richard Carter Northern States Solar Services LLC htt o: / /www.northernstatessolar.com Green Energy Cafe http: / /www.-greeneneraycafe.com richard @areeneneravcafe.com 952- 292 -1930 (Minnesota) Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments may be legally privileged and confidential. If you are not an intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e -mail in error, please notify the sender by calling (952) 292 -1930 and permanently delete the e-mail and any attachments immediately. You should not retain, copy, or use this e-mail or any attachment for any purpose, nor disclose all or any part of the contents to any other person. This e-mail does not itself constitute, represent, or establish a relationship between the sender and the recipient. Thank you. 0 `4, q Zh- SoLJRCE WATER Z. ,$ O 1. l.! T 1 O N S Date: September 6, 2011 2748 42"d Ave S. Minneapolis, MN 55406 612.354.2549 www.sourcewater-solutions.com To: Mr. James Hovland, Mayor, City of Edina Mr. Cary Teague, Planning Director, City of Edina Mr. Tom Harmening, City Manager, City of St. Louis Park Mr. Rick Getschow, City Manager, City of Hopkins Ms. Debbie Goettel, Mayor, City of Richfield Mr. R.T. Rybak, Mayor, City of Minneapolis Mr. Mark Bernhardson, City Manager, City of Bloomington Ms. Nancy Tyra- Lukens, Mayor, City of Eden Prairie Mr. Terry Bovee, Planner,* Minnesota Department of Health Mr. John Freitag, Planner, Minnesota Department of Health Mr. Chris Elvrum, Planner, Metropolitan Council Environmental Services Mr. Eric Evenson, District Manager, Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Mr. Kevin Bigalke, District Manager, Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Mr. Mike Opat, Commissioner, Hennepin County Board Ms. Kristine Martin, Director, Hennepin County Planning Department Mr. Kim Boyce, Chair, Hennepin County Conservation District Re: City of EdinaWellhead Protection Plan Update SEP 0 8 2011 On behalf of the City of Edina, Source Water Solutions is notifying neighboring and overlying units of government of Minnesota Department of Health approval of the City's Part I Wellhead Protection Plan Update. The goal of the plan is to prevent human - caused contaminants from entering their water supply wells and to protect all who use our water supply from adverse health effects associated with groundwater contamination. This notice is required by the Minnesota Wellhead Protection Rule, part 4720.5560 Subpart 2. Included with this notice are copies of the delineated wellhead protection area (WHPA), drinking water supply management area (DWSMA), and assessments of well and aquifer vulnerability. A public information meeting is required to take place within 60 days of the Plan approval notice. This meeting has been scheduled to take place September 27, 2011 at 5:30 p.m. and will provide the public an opportunity to review the Plan. The meeting will be held at: Edina Public Works & Park Maintenance Facility 7450 Metro Blvd. Edina, MN 55439 The City will initiate Part 11 Planning activities in Fall 2011. If you have any questions regarding the City's Part 11 Plan or the City's plan for implementation, please contact Jesse Struve, Edina's WHP Manager at 952- 903 -5713 (email jstruve @ci.edina.mn.us), or Erik Tomlinson, Edina's WHP Consultant at 612 - 354 -2549 (email erik @sourcewater - solutions.com). Ai- 7 V41111.1. 77, e 00 A E151W Mtsaj— i&Ll - - �Iel L:1 1 UWA T�FDI,YA I V A , 'Di i FOINA FDINA .. .. ... 1 Legend f O Edina Wells 0 SWUDS Municipal Boundaries Wellhead Protection Area Emergency Response Area 4,0002,000 0 4,000 DWSMA t Feet Project EDINA 110899 3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR. Print Date 06 /20/2011 ST. PAUL, MN 55110 WHPA and DWSMA Figure PHONE: (651) 490 -2000 Map by: SrH1ejt FAX: (651) 490-2150 Projection: UTM, Zone 15, NAD 83, m WATTS: 8GO-321-2015 So— US.S 1.1 Min. Top., Edina Wellhead Protection Plan Update SEH_aa,inc.com Mn DOT, and SrH Inc. Edina, Minnesota This map is nb1ffibr,1,g,11y—nJ,d map r— survey mop and is not Intended b. be used one. Tbf map i, a —pflef- of ,bw,d,, information, -d dale gathered fto—n ... ....... listed on thir. —, and is 10 be used for el—nb- p.— -,. SEX d... net ".—I that the G ... ni,!,c ,,f.—b— Sy.— (GIS) O,t, —d to tepee — — free, —d SEX 1— not —. — be used for —i 1—mg, or any the, p— ,q,,I,g .... 6n,, measurement of dilibin- or direction r pion in - de,l cfibn pf ..... phl. Wt,—. The user of this map --lbot— that SEX —11 not be liable fi,r any damages whlch arise out of the useis access or use of d.t, p—d.d. f 0 Legend r i�`t -;'r' EDINA 14 EDINA 10 EDINA 9 en �. • • j�n'9h ��'�� �t3 V° `N'�- s�,n,.�.��,,,` �. Q Edina Wells .- Municipal Boundari es - r—� t i u DWSMA n- DWSMA Vulnerability 9=. v Low V Moderate U, L r High ,r',;r ff VulnerabllltyScoretJ pdate G 8 O Low 4,000 0 4,000 I ` O Moderate {� Feet'_ o • High Project: EDINA 110899 1111 ISOENTER DR. Print Date: O6 /1/2011 ST.PAU DWSMA VULNERABILITY ST. PAUL, MN 55110 Figure PHONE: (651) 490 -2000 Map by: SrH /ejt ® FAX: (651) 490 -2150 Projection: UTM, Zone 15, NAD 63, m SEH WATTS: 600-325-2055 Source: USGS 7.5 Min. Topo, Edina Wellhead Protection Plan Update www.sehinc.com Mn DOT, and SEH Inc. Edina, Minnesota This map Is neither a legally recorded map nor a survey map and Is not intended to be used as one. Thls map is a compibtion of records, information, and data gathered hom various sources Ikled on thls map and is b be used for reference purposes only. SEH does not — .,d that the Geographic Information Sy,lem (GIS) Oat, used to prepare are error free, and SEH does not dpd, rd that the GIs Data can be used for na vlgalbnal, trecldn6. or any other purpose requHng exacting measurement of dladnce of dimctun or precision In Ne depiction of geogrephk features. The user of this map aeknowleeeas that SEH shall not be liable for any damsgee wM1ich aria out of the _ft -- or usa of dal, provided. owe tl�, ch K,t- 18BB REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item VIII. -2 DEBRA MANGEN Action From: CITY CLERK ❑ Discussion ® Information Date: JUNE 20, 2011 Subject: CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED AFTER PACKETS INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: Attached is a copy of an e-mail 'and an e- comment received after the packets were delivered to you. City of Edina ity Council Tuesday, September 20, 2011 eComment Repor granicus. RIFICEWED SEP 2 0 2011 1 VI. COMMUNITY COMMENT ❑ Support Oppose ❑ None 100% 0% 0% Public Comments Summary 1 0 Public Comments Details 0 1 Total 1 VI. COMMUNITY COMMENT 1 0 0 1 °hil Hoop I have observed frequent safety /traffic violations at the pedestrian crosswalk that crosses Support nilhoop @mm.com Hazelton Road between France Avenue and York road. This is the extension of the Centennial 9/18/2011 Page 1 7330 Cornelia'Drive ILakes walkway with pedestrian initiated stoplights. Routinely, vehicles pass through this Edina'MN jwalkvvay when the yield lights are flashing and one or more pedestrians are in the walkway. Al couple of times.) have been one of the pedestrians forced to scramble to avoid being hit. Please review this situation j _......_.. _........ _ _... _ ..... Page 2 Sppan.Ho .Wl From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 3:45 PM To: Susan Howl_ Subject: FW: Dance With Us America, Grand Opening I111ECEO V ED Lynette Biunno, Receptionist SEP 6 211 t l 952- 927 -8861 1 Fax-952- 826 -0389 LIbiFr�noCa)v edin Learnri www.CitvofEdina.com _ _ _ _ _ �, „ _ _ _ _ !—� µ – ... g, ng, Ra, srng Families 6z. U0 ng Iiusmess From: Dance with us America America [mailto:dancewithusa @gmail.com] Sent: Friday, September 16, 20113:15 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Dance With Us America, Grand Opening It would be an honor for us if you would join us on October 2, to celebrate our grand opening. Our studio, Dance With Us America offers many different styles.of dance and fitness for children, teens, and adults. We specialize in Ballroom /Latin dance however we have experienced and caring teachers in all kinds of styles. Our mission is to create an environment where children and teens can come and enjoy themselves during a fun filled fitness dance class. We understand that obesity is a growing epidemic in our country and Minnesota as well. We strive to provide not only physical fitness but cultural learning, sense of discipline, and determination. We believe that if you provide children and teens. with a stable and healthy place to hang out and enjoy themselves then they will stay away from unhealthy and dangerous activities. Our goals of keeping children and teenagers healthy and safe are a top priority for us. We want to pull the kids off the streets and bring them into a caring, safe, and goal achieving environment, giving them a sense of self and, accomplishment that keeps them from wanting to harm themselves with fast food, unhealthy eating, drugs, alcohol and much more. Please join us in our efforts to make our community a better place to live. Heres where you come in; we would like you to join us for our grand opening. During which, we would like our community to know that we have the support of our local Mayor. What we do is very important to us and we would love to set up a meeting where we could go over how you could be of help to us. We hope to hear from you soon, Thank you for your time, Dance With Us America Gene and Elena Bersten 'Dance with us, America ) Southdale Center space #930, Il.dina MN 55435 www.dancewithusamerica.com 612.564.5483 +` , i Sharon Allison prom: Wayne Houle Sent: Monday, September 19, 20111:54 PM To: Shibani Bisson; Sharon Allison; Jesse Struve Cc: Scott Neal; Karen M. Kurt; Jack Sullivan; George Bender Subject: RE: West 44th Street Reconstruction Project /time- sensitive questions Shibani: Great job! Thank you for taking care of this email. Sharon: Can you be sure that the City Council receives a hard copy of this email for tomorrow night? Jesse: Please call Shibani if you have any questions on the restoration technique that is being used on West 44th Street believe the timing of the restoration is perfect with the EEC workshop — being that this is a much.greener construction method than sod. xtu,xtfa Wayne Houle, City Engineer /Director of Public Works 952 - 826 -0443 1 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 s� WHoule @ci.edina.mmus I www.CityofEdina.com gym. ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From: Shibani Bisson [mailto:SBisson @wsbeng.com] Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 11:48 AM To: Joni Bennett; Wayne Houle :c: Scott Neal; Karen M. Kurt; Jack Sullivan; George Bender Subject: RE: West 44th Street Reconstruction Project /time- sensitive questions Joni - The remaining sidewalk that is left to be installed along Ms. Simpson's property is along Wooddale Avenue starting from her driveway north to W 44th Street. The contractor plans to pour the sidewalk this Wednesday. This section of the sidewalk was delayed because there is a gate valve adjacent to the hydrant that needs to be raised prior to the sidewalk being poured. The gate valve will be raised tomorrow. We are implementing a hydromulch (hydroseed) application for restoring the boulevard and yard areas disturbed by the project. This work will take place within the next two weeks. Attached is a letter sent to residents regarding this application. This method is typically more sustainable that sod especially where you have relatively small areas to restore. In addition, due to the effects of the relatively higher traffic volumes on W 44th Street and associated salt damage to sod, there may not be a good chance that the sod will survive. Both Edina and St. Louis Park have seen areas like these where the sod does not "take" even after multiple replacements. St. Louis Park has implemented the hydromulch application on their street projects, including the Wooddale Avenue project a few years ago. We know this is something new to the residents and are expecting questions and concerns regarding this. Regarding sand and dust on her property. The contractor is required to provide dust control on the job site by watering the roadway as needed to control the dust. When the street was under construction, they had been doing this a several times a day- weather dependent. Inevitably you will have some dust as it cannot all be contained. Overwatering the roadway affect the roadway surface and sub soils also, making it more difficult to rebuild the street. The contractor has to balance these conditions with the watering. Irrigation repair should be occurring this week or next week along her property. I hope this addresses her questions. Wayne and I discussed her email late last Friday and we were going to provide a response this week. He is at a conference this week and will be back Thursday, but may follow up to this email if I did not cover everything. Please call or email me with any further questions. Thank you! Shibani Bisson, PE Municipal Senior Project Manager d: 763 - 287 -7162 1 c: 612- 360 -1304 WSB & Associates, Inc. 1 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 1 Minneapolis, MN 55416 . A Enginecririg - Planning; . O Envitonmonwi,- Constr6c6bn ddaulmC Cr. This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the addressee, please delete this email from your system: Any use of this email by unintended recipients is strictly prohibited. WSB & Associates, Inc. does not accept liability for any errors or omissions which arise as a result of electronic transmission. If verification is required, please request a hard copy. From: Joni Bennett [ mailto :jonibennettl2 @comcast.net] Sent: Saturday, September 17, 20112:46 PM To: Wayne Houle; Shibani Bisson - Cc: Scott Neal; KKurt@ci.edina.mn.us Subject: West 44th Street Reconstruction Project/time- sensitive questions Wayne and Shibani, I received the email below from Wendy Simpson this past week, and, at her request, asked Deb Mangen to forward it to other City Council members. The Simpsons own and reside in the home at the southeast corner of West 44th Street and Wooddale Avenue. What can you tell me about the issues Ms. Simpson raises? I understand from City Extra updates that Phase I of the project ran from France Avenue to Wooddale Avenue and that Phase II of the project is running from Wooddale Avenue to Mackey. I also am very familiar with the work that was done on Wooddale Avenue 'between West 44th Street and Sunnyside Road in conjunction with the Country Club Street Reconstruction Project. Ms. Simpson's chief concerns appear to be completion of the north/south sidewalk from 44th Street to Sunnyside Road that runs between her home and Wooddale Avenue and installation of sod to encapsulate the dirt that is migrating into her home. When are those items scheduled to be completed? If possible, I would appreciate very much receiving even a preliminary response on Monday, September 19 before noon. I will see Ms. Simpson at a meeting in the Momingside neighborhood on Monday afternoon, and would like to be able to respond to her questions. Thank you - Joni Bennett j onibennett 12 gcomcast. net 952- 927 -0661 Begin forwarded message: From: "Deb Mangen" <DMangen _ci:edina.mn.us> Date: September 16, 2011 8:42 :32 AM CDT To: <swensonann a-gmaihcom >, ,< JHovland(cDkrauserol lifts. com >, <Lonibennett12Cc�comcast:net >, "Mary Brindle" <mbrin'dle(a)_comcast.net >, "Sprague., - Joshua S" m> Cc: "Scott Neal" <sneal .ci.edina:mn:us >, "Karen M Kurt" <KKurt ci.edina.mn.us> Subject: FW: 44th Street Dirt.Zone Member Bennett requested this be sent out. Debra Mangen, MMC, City Clerk 952- 826 -0408 1 Fai 952 - 826 -0390 try DMangenAdedina.mn.us 14im.CitvofEdina.com a•t � ^y ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business From,: Joni Bennett [ mailto :jonibennettl2 @comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, September 15, 20117:47 PM To: Deb Mangen Cc: Scott Neal Subject: Fwd: 44th Street Dirt Zone Deb, I received this email today from Wendy Simpson, homeowner and resident at the southeast corner of West 44th Street and Wooddale Avenue. As she requested, could you please forward it to other Council members? Thank you - Joni jbnibennettl2@comcast.net 952- 927 -0661 Begin forwarded message: From: "Wendy Simpson" <wendy.simpson(cD-earthlink.net> Date: September 15, 2011 9:09:19 AM CDT To: "'Joni Bennett "' <jonibennett12(c comcast.net> Subject: 44th Street Dirt Zone . Please forward to City Council. Hi Joni, I wanted to let you know what I have been experiencing during this construction. As you may remember, my house was 'first' for the start of all of this construction going toward France. Our corner is first for all the construction going toward Brookside. I lived by the staging zone for two summers of road construction in country club. kt this point, all of the sidewalks have been installed now from Wooddale to France, except for mine. I have about 12 feet of yard that has been dug up and is an absolute sand storm. My house is filthy, my carpets are filthy, I have a beach in my garage. I do not understand WHY my sidewalk has not been installed along with all the other work that was done on this end of the street. My car was hit during the days I, had to park it on the street, which I have to go report to insurance and have repaired, will have to power wash my house, hire-someone to clean the windows, have carpets and potentially tiles cleaned inside the house. I have hardly been able to breathe this summer with the dust in the air. My lawn is close to being dead and now I hear the intention is to seed vs. sod. I was told someone would repair the irrigation system this week and that has not happened. I am fine with seed along the front yard, but I want SOD along Wooddale — too much of my yard _has been dug up and I want an end to this filth as soon as. possible. What will it take.to get my sidewalk in and SOD the Wooddale side of my home so I can get my house cleaned before it is freezing out? I do not want to wait for my finishing work along with the second half of the project and I have no comprehension why my sidewalk was left off?? Grrrrr. Sorry to vent, but I am in a hurry and don't have time to 'edit' right now. Please advise. Thank you. 3 — ��c�.� SDK %tz� M i° RECEOVED SEP 2,0 2011 --------------- C�"'� �lAf -l�z� big m 4& h h/hcG� wry ela's cr�sra�- P.�ass 6� c�r�c�ousn�s �s �x �.{h� l,P�� - exccJc�- .ca.2Q,� �u �cG i� a cveeel�,.Sfx �,xo ,OCO►ld ad -7 WOO A 60k G�►�!� dr�v�r��m e� chi �- e�ecP�ue. � (� iue. wxaJ *9 &wld (a-Ae 4 �sf klA 6� kAo dAy bt otcd �K�- �7ha�s o.�sfl � ,�i �i- ,/�,. r�rds Ir 4� MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PARK BOARD ' HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 9, 2011; 7:00 PM L CALL TO ORDER Chairman Hulbert called the meeting to order at: 7:01 pm II. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Deeds, Fronek,Jacobson, Jones, Lough, Meyer; Peterson, Segreto, Steel and Chair Hulbert III. APPROVAL OFMEE TING AGENDA, Motion made by Member Fronek and seconded by Member Deeds approving the meeting agenda. Ayes: Deeds, Fronek, Jacobson, Jones, Lough, Meyer, Peterson, Segreto, Steel, Hulbert Motion carried. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Motion made by Fronek and seconded by Member Deeds approving the consent agenda as follows: IV.A. Approval of Minutes —Regular meeting of July 12, 2011 Ayes: Deeds, Fronek, Jacobson, Jones, Lough, Meyer, Peterson, Segreto, Steel, Hulbert Motion carried. V. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS V.A. DONATIONS POLICYAND NAMING OF PARKS AND FACILITIES POLICY WORKING GROUP Member Jones informed the Park Board that she continues to publicize the fact that there is a group that will be working on policy development on naming and donations. She noted that their first meeting will be on September 12'' from 12:30 to 1:30 pm and that they plan on meeting the second and•fourth Mondays September and October. She added,that,she encourages people to bring their lunch and make it a real work session over lunch. Member Jones pointed'out that if anyone in the community or on the Park Board is interested in being a part of this working group to contact. Janet Canton at City Hall. Chair Hulbert asked if this will be publicized in the Sun Current,to which Member Jones replied yes they have sent a press release to the Sun Current. V.B. USER FEES WORKING GROUP Member Steel informed, the Park Board that it's pretty much the same as Member Jones stated about the donations and naming work group. She explained that the user fee working group will focus on the fee scales and costs associated with the facilities. She added that these meetings will also be held over the lunch hour on the first and third Wednesdays of the month in September and October. Member Steel indicated that they are also looking.for members of the public as well as they are looking for user groups to provide input as well. Member Jones indicated that she.has been going over the youth athletic association's relationship with the Park Board. She asked Mr. Keprios if it would be possible to get the athletic association's financial statements before their first meeting., Mr. Keprios/replied to just let him know what it is exactly they would like and he would be.happy to provide them with either an electronic and/or hard copy.: 1 'v V.C. SPORTS DOME STUDY COMMITTEE Chair Hulbert informed the Park Board that there have been a couple of public meetings in regards to the Sports Dome proposal. He indicated that the City Council has requested that the Park Board put together a work group to study the need for such an athletic facility. He commented that he thinks they have learned recently that there is a need for these types of facilities. Members Fronek, Deeds, Jacobson, Hulbert and Jones stated they would like to participate in the work group. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that he sees this as a two -part process. He noted that Ann Kattreh has been assigned the duty to be the lead staff person to put the study together and she is going to see this through from start to finish. Mr. Keprios explained that the first thing the City Council would like to see done is have a public facility inventory of all of the City of Edina's publicly owned recreational facilities. He stated that secondly they would like the work group to determine the feasibility of putting a sports dome or bubble in the City of Edina on one of their publicly owned properties. Mr. Keprios indicated that the City Council has allocated up to $20,000 to help them with the study and as he sees it that money would go into the feasibility part; what it is going to cost to prepare the site, to build the facility, how would it be financed and what would it cost to operate. He stated that these are the kinds of details that these consultants are experts at and is where he thinks these dollars should be spent. Mr. Keprios indicated the rest of it with the committee's input and direction Ms. Kattreh and staff will collect the information the group would like to have because there are a variety of directions this may play out. Member Meyer stated that he thinks they were very speck about mentioning city owned or managed facilities and asked if they will take into account school district facilities. He added that it may factor into this because some of the associations use the school district facilities as well. Mr. Keprios replied that Ms. Kattreh and he asked the City Manager that question to which Mr. Neal agrees it is an important part of the study. Therefore, although the City Council did not direct us to inventory School District facilities, he agrees with Mr. Meyer that School District facilities should be part of the study. Member Deeds made a motion, seconded by Chair Hulbert approving the working group for the Sports Dome Study Committee. Ayes: Deeds, Fronek, Jacobson, Jones, Lough, Meyer, Peterson, Segreto, Steel, Hulbert Motion carried. V.D. 2012 -2016 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS Mr. Keprios gave a power point presentation on the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for the Park and Recreation Department. He noted that the Park Board will be receiving CIP's for the enterprise facilities for the September Park Board meeting. He indicated that the CIP is a five year plan but a one year budget and although they try to anticipate how they are going to spend their money five years from now the City Council only approves budget dollars for one year in advance. He added that although he won't be asking the Park Board to vote on this until next month's meeting he wants to go over some information for the Park Board to think about and/or ask questions before the September meeting. Mr. Keprios informed the park Board that a survey was done in 2006 that had a 95% level of confidence with a plus or minor error of 3.4 which is phenomenal for a community survey. He stated that the number one thing on the list was the maintenance of parks so before they build anything new they need to be sure they have money in the budget to cover the maintenance and upkeep of the parks. He noted that recently a Quality of Life survey was completed about how the residents feel about their services and facilities in Edina and the results show that residents feel very good about their parks and programs. Mr. Keprios indicated that one thing on the schedule for 2012 is the "Natural Resources Inventory Assessment" and noted this was something that didn't come from staff but was Park Board driven from several years back. He stated that as staff he would recommend that the Park Board hold off on this K because it would cost approximately $100,000 to do a study like this similar to what was done in the City of Northfield and in fact that is where the idea came from. He indicated that a former Park Board member was the Director of Resource and Park Planning for the City of Northfield. He commented that it seemed like a great idea at that time; however, the reason their study was done in the first place was because Northfield was going through a very strong growth period and they were very sensitive about the types of lands they were going to convert to development. He pointed out that is not the case or scenario for Edina. Therefore he is recommending that Park Board delay or completely pull this off the map for now, largely because of their economic times as well as it's not something he feels is high on the priority list. Mr. Keprios went through the master plan at Countryside Park and explained that to complete the master plan they would need to replace the shelter building with a new one as well as put a hockey rink back in but, this time, in the correct north/south orientation. He pointed out there are no dollars in the CIP to do this; however, he recently learned that it sounds like the "Waters Development" at Colonial Church is going to happen and with that there will be just under $700,000 going into the Developers Fund. Therefore there will probably have enough money to do almost the entire master plan. He commented that his question to the Park Board to think about is should we use that money to complete the Countryside mater plan in the next year or two. Member Meyer asked if the 2012 projects are the same ones that Park Board approved last year without changes to which Mr. Keprios replied that is correct. Chair Hulbert noted that it states parking lot expansions at Pamela Park in the 2013 CIP and asked if the west parking lot was going to be made wider because it's really tight. Mr. Keprios responded that the Pamela Park master plan shows 37 additional spaces on the west parking lot, 23 additional spaces on the south parking lot and 15 additional spaces on the north parking lot. Chair Hulbert commented that his daughter plays soccer there and parking is really crazy and people ask if they can park on the grass area where the open skating rink is. He asked if perhaps they could put some Class 5 gravel in that area so there could be more parking now. Mr. Keprios replied that is something they can look at if it's really bad but that they will be expanding those parking lots in 2013. However, if it is really that bad they could maybe look at doing something on a temporary basis. He added he will consult with the City Engineer and traffic safety folks to make sure they would not be creating an unsafe condition. Member Deeds asked if they have considered a turf field where the proposed field is located given drainage issues and wear and tear. Mr. Keprios replied they did consider that but after a lengthy public process with the neighborhood it was decided it would not be a very good fit for that neighborhood to have artificial turf. He noted that what they wanted was to have a field like those at Braemar and Lewis Park which are exceptional fields and wonderfully drained but they are on sand peat. He commented that Pamela Park does not have that surface but it could possibly be converted to a sand/peat athletic field. Member Jones asked if in the plan they are adding any fields they don't currently have. Mr. Keprios replied in the master plan for Pamela Park they are adding a more defined field because the current field is not a very safe field. Member Jones asked is this being proposed for 2014 to which Mr. Keprios replied yes, the new athletic field for Pamela is not any different from what they approved last year. Mr. Keprios added that isn't to say it still can't be changed because priorities can change; however, they feel 2014 is a good time to have it done. Mr. Keprios explained that there are still a lot of things that are needed or desired in addition to the 5 year CIP. He noted that the Edina Baseball Association has a wonderful wish list of some improvements they would like to make at the Courtney Ball fields and if you total it up it comes to approximately 1.5 million dollars. He informed the Park Board this is something they will be hearing a lot more about 3 because they anticipate it to be done through some fundraising efforts and could be added to the list of unfunded projects. Mr. Keprios went through the unfunded CIP park project for the Park Board to think about before their next meeting. Member Deeds stated that before they get serious about this next month could the Park Board get some usage data and demand data regarding hockey versus the rectangular fields. He noted he thinks they may have to make some potential trade -offs because which one are we shorter of. Mr. Keprios replied that he would be happy to get that data but doesn't know that it necessarily becomes either one or the other. He noted that he thinks that will come out as part of the facilities inventory that Ms. Kattreh is heading up. He commented that with some direction he thinks that would be a good question to ask them to do but that he would happy to get that for them. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that they will be hearing more from all of their enterprise facilities managers at the September meeting. He noted that in addition to the enterprise facilities' CIPs they will also be acting on their proposed fees and charges and requesting review and comment on their proposed budgets. Member Lough asked Mr. Keprios how unfunded projects become funded; are they added into the fifth year of a five year plan and they slowly progress their way forward. Mr. Keprios responded that is exactly how it happens and that the City Council relies very much on the Park Board's input to make that happen. Member Lough asked what puts the dollar limitation on what they might choose to do. For example why wouldn't they just roll all of it forward to this year, what is the process by which the funding actually takes place? Mr. Keprios replied he doesn't have a very good answer to that other than he hears when the request for funding is too high and needs to be lowered. He stated there is no policy in place that shows how much money they get. Member Lough asked if typically that money comes from the general fund or donations. Mr. Keprios explained that is a great question for the Finance Director, its tax money bottom line but the funds it draws from the Finance Director would need to explain and he would be happy to invite him to a Park Board meeting to explain it. Member Lough indicated that maybe this would be something for a subcommittee because he would be interested in the process. Member Deeds replied he would also be interested as well as he is a little curious about how the endowment for Edinborough Park is being managed and the return on it. Mr. Keprios stated he would encourage Mr. Deeds to meet one on one with the Finance Director on how that is managed because there is a portfolio with many pages that shows a variety of funds. Member Steel indicated regarding the "Natural Resources Inventory Assessment" she is trying to think of it in terms of capital improvement and asked if an assessment would generally be included in the CIP. Mr. Keprios explained the reason it's there is because it's too big of an item to fall into the operational budget that's approved by the City Council and that's the only other source of funding that they could really draw from. Member Steel asked so capital improvements are just limited to maintenance and infrastructure type of things and if they were to have another type of assessment they would include it in the CIP if it was a large sum. Member Steel explained that what she is trying to understand is how an inventory assessment contributes to improving capital versus another inventory assessment and where do they draw the line as to what should be considered a capital improvement. Mr. Keprios replied that he thinks in this case because it was Park Board driven from the start there was really no other fund to take care of that project because it seemed to be a high priority at that time. Other than their capital improvement plan there is no other budget to draw from. He noted that arguably it may or may not be a capital improvement but it is more or less that that is where the money is available. Member Steel commented so if they were to choose to not include this in the CIP there would not be a funding source for this particular project in the next couple years or could they request funding in a couple of years. Mr. Keprios replied that they certainly could request that it come back and be funded at a future date that 4 would be a very appropriate recommendation. Chair Hulbert asked could they remove it and use those funds for some unfunded capital improvements that may potentially be a greater benefit to the community. Mr. Keprios replied that is going to become your decision as a Park Board at the September meeting. He added that he would encourage the Park Board members to talk to their neighbors, friends, etc., and find out what they may feel is important in the list of priorities. Member Segreto asked Mr. Keprios if she could receive a copy of the Park Board minutes so she can see how this came about and what the concerns were at that time. Mr. Keprios replied he will do that as well as give her the survey booklet that was conducted for the City of Northfield. Member Segreto stated that she can understand the reluctance to do a 100% coverage inventory of Edina but she also wants to be sensitive that there are some environmental areas especially in wetlands or perhaps around Nine Mile Creek. She noted that there is a bike trail that is being constructed and perhaps if they could get a square footage of what it is they want inventoried that the price may go down and there would be more room for it in the budget. Mr. Keprios replied that Three Rivers Park District has spent over $50,000 to study the environmental effects of putting the trail where it is currently proposed. The Three Rivers Park District learned from that they do not need to take the next step which would be to conduct an Environmental Impact Study. He pointed out that it is the Watershed District's duty to determine what the impact on wetlands will be, so this really wouldn't cover that anyway. He indicated this is really more of the natural woodlands which are mostly at Braemar and many other parks with wooded areas. Member Segreto stated that she will read the study and be prepared to perhaps discuss it at the September meeting. Member Jones stated that in looking at the CIP she would like to try to make sure that they stick with their priority criteria and for the next meeting she would like to see the schedule for replacement of all of the playground equipment, as well as the warming houses. Mr. Keprios replied that Mr. MacHolda has done a great job in keeping an intelligent, well thought out schedule of playground equipment replacement. He stated that the replacement plan itself doesn't go beyond 10 or 15 years but explained that one of the problems is some of the equipment will last 20 to 30 years or more so it's not that it absolutely has to be replaced but it gets to an age where the neighborhoods say they would like the newer and better equipment that they saw in another park. He pointed out there is a schedule they have been following and they are almost caught up and he will be sure the Park Board gets a copy of that schedule. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board in terms of the older shelter buildings it really becomes a judgment call. He explained the reason he throws that out there is because he is proposing only one gets replaced in the next five years. He stated that if the Park Board would like to change that it's an old battle of priority of which is more important because they were all built the same year. He noted that it's going to become the Park Board's recommendation when you think they should be replaced or is there something more important that should happen before that and so there is no schedule on the shelter buildings. Member Jones asked Mr. Keprios if he could give her the dates they were built to which he replied yes. Member Jones asked if the monies from the "The Waters" need to be used at Countryside Park to which Mr. Keprios replied no, it could be used for something else if the Park Board and City Council choose to do so. Member Deeds asked Mr. Keprios if they are at the end of the useful life for the golf dome. He explained the reason he asks is because if there is currently a consultant studying Braemar Golf Course and there is the possibility of a sports dome would it be possible to extend its life another year or two before spending that $460,000 since there is a potential for changes. Mr. Keprios replied that he just had a conversation with Todd Anderson, Manager of Braemar Golf Course, who informed him he would like to adjust his proposed CIP to not replace the building. He noted that Manager Anderson would like to purchase and install only the structural steel needed to support the dome and yet maintain the structural integrity of the building. This would give the dome something to hang onto rather than the wood 9 structure. He added that Mr. Anderson feels he can get several more years out of that building by making that investment to which it will cost significantly less. Member Meyer commented that in looking at the unfunded CIP projects it shows $400,000 for additional landscaping and asked how many projects does that include? In addition, are those things they should be chipping away at on some sort of ongoing basis. Mr. Keprios replied there isn't a specific plan as far as landscaping that he can show the Park Board. He explained that former Park and Recreation Director, Bob Kojetin, always told him they never got to the final plan of the Park Development because they never had the funding to finish what he sees as the landscaping. He noted that $400,000 could be spent literally on landscaping to plant trees, shrubs and flowers although he thinks that would be a lot. He commented that this project is completely staff driven from notes and history. Member Meyer stated that he thinks because it is such a large amount it never gets done. He suggested spending $50,000 or $25,000 a year on landscaping and it would start to make some of that happen. Mr. Keprios commented that he should probably adjust that number and that his staff actually does a great job of chipping away at it by planting trees, shrubs, etc. so they do slowly pick away at it but there are still a lot of projects that he sees out there that can still get done. Member Meyer commented that he sees lighting listed and asked if any of the items are safety issues because if there are they may want to consider making those a higher priority. Mr. Keprios explained that the one they are still addressing is the question of proper lighting for the Courtney ball fields. He noted that lighting the fields was done five or six years ago. He indicated that it has been brought to their attention, even though they had the Edina Baseball Association (EBA) involved in the design, that the EBA feels that the upper level lighting is a little dangerous and that they lose sight of the baseball during night games on really high fly balls. He commented that in his 34 years he has never heard of a player getting injured from not seeing a ball coming out of the dark sky. Mr. Keprios stated that they do prioritize the safety items which he thinks they have done and are listed on the schedule. Member Deeds asked staff whether lighting would be a fairly inexpensive way of extending their ability to use some of the fields given where they are running into a lot of congestion. Mr. Keprios responded that it's clearly a lesser expensive method than trying to create new green space somewhere. He explained that the problem they run into with lighting is which field do you light and is it politically palatable. He added that when the parks were initially built they were located in neighborhoods where kids could walk to the park. Edina did not build large athletic field complexes in non - residential areas similar to other newer communities. When you start putting up lights in these parks it can be difficult. Member Meyer stated on the various projects on the CIP he is noticing different funds where the funding is coming out of. He noted that four of them list the construction fund as the source and asked where do those dollars come from? Mr. Keprios replied that those again are great questions for their Finance Director to explain how does the construction fund get funded and why it is called that? Member Steel indicated she would like to hear from the Finance Director on how their budget falls within the City of Edina. What is the percentage that their CIP constitutes? Year to year are the City priorities reflected in their year to year CIP? She noted she understands they come from a need basis but is there a bigger overall city plan. Mr. Keprios replied that is a complex question to answer because funding comes from so many sources, there is state aid for roads, special assessments, etc., where they do and don't compete for dollars. He pointed out that for many years they used to get $150,000 a year and that was their CIP they had to live with for the year. He noted that all of the large maintenance items had to wait and he credits Gordon Hughes, former City Manager, for turning that around. It wasn't until his era that they started to get some significant dollars. He indicated that when he first became Park Director he recognized that they first needed to keep up with what they have in place before they build anything new and so Mr. MacHolda and he work hard to get a referendum which they did and it passed for 5.5 million and it ended up being mostly maintenance. Mr. Keprios stated that 0 since then they've heard from their voters we should not go to a referendum for maintenance but find ways to maintain existing infrastructure without having to borrow money. He commented that he thinks they've done a good job of trying to continually improve that fund to where they can afford to do more things. Members Deeds asked if there is a source that is generating donations to help support Edina Parks and Recreation. Is there a place where a citizen can contribute and donate to a tax deductible 501 (C) 3 organization that could potentially help with some. of this? Mr.. Keprios explained there' are two: the City of Edina itself and the Edina Community Foundation. Member Meyer asked if the $300,000 that is listed in 2016 at the Aquatic Center a major update or just a plan modification. Mr. MacHolda replied it's actually d. replacement of the play structure in the zero depth pool. Member Meyer asked staff if they could get some guidance in the unfunded CIP projects. He asked if they could pick out the top 20% or top third because maybe`they could start plugging iwsome of those items and help to start,build up some priority. He commented if there are any other. smaller projects that are not on the list to please add them. Member Peterson asked how much a used Zamboni would be worth. He also asked why it can't be rehabbed or maybe the company could take theirs and fix it, clean it up and replace the parts and give it back to them. Mr. Keprios replied that would be a great question for the arena manager at next month's meeting. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that they will be called upon at their next meeting to make some tough decisions. He noted it's an important part of what the Park Board does in prioritizing for the community where the dollars ought to be spent next year with the capital dollars they have at hand. VI. CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS Member Lough indicated that their student member, Felix Pronove, sent the Park Board a very good email and would like to have.it included with the minutes. Member Lough made a motion, seconded by Member Steel to have Felix Pronove's e-mail included in the August Park Board minutes. Ayes: Deeds, Fronek, Jacobson, Jones, Lough, Meyer, Peterson, Segreto, Steel, Hulbert Motion carried. Member Peterson stated that it, seems like they spend an enormous amount of money on parking lots. He suggested' maybe they look at the possibility of having a joint committee between the Park Board and Transportation Commission. He noted maybe they could buy 10 good buses, bus the teams and families to the various parks. He commented that it seems to him they would save an awful lot -of money. VU STAFF COMMENTS VHA. Golf Course Study Presentation — August 30, 2011 Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the golf course study will be presented on Tuesday, August 30" at 5:30 pm in the Council Chambers. He asked that the Park Board members please attend. He noted that Richard Singer will be presenting his findings and his recommendations. He indicated that once he. receives the written report he will forward it on to the Park Board members. VH& 'Edinborough Park Study Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board they have hired ATS &R to conduct the study. He noted that Susie Miller will be the lead staff person working very closely with it and that it should be completed in 7 December at the latest. Mr. Keprios added that ATS &R did a great job in the interview and that he thinks they will do an excellent job. VH.C. Veteran's Memorial Update Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the Veterans Memorial Committee received 13 submittals for the artist/sculptor for the eagle focal point of the memorial. He indicated that the committee, with the help of the Edina Public Art Committee, was able to narrow it down to four for interviews. After the interviews it was unanimous to enter into a contractual agreement with Robert Eccleston from Lake Placid, New York as their artist/sculptor, to which he was very pleased with the outcome. Member Meyer asked what is the fundraising status with the Veterans Memorial Committee. Mr. Keprios replied that the fundraising has not kicked off yet, it's kind of the cart before the horse thing. The committee is waiting until they have a plan to show prospective donors before they kick off their fundraiser. He indicated that there is a committee that is working towards a plan on what type of process they are going to follow. He added that a lot of it is coming up with names and getting people involved. Mr. Keprios stated that they are not going to be able to spend a dime until they have money in the bank and that the Edina Community Foundation is the keeper of the bank. Member Jones asked what is the process and timeline for the committee to show the Park Board the plan. Mr. Keprios replied as soon as they have decided on the final plan they will make a formal presentation and recommendation to the Park Board. He stated that at that point they will have a recommendation for the public process to then take place. He indicated that the Public Hearing will definitely take place at the City Council meeting; however, they would like to have an Open House similar to the Nine Mile Trail Open House and so that process will be brought to you for approval. There being no further business on the Park Board Agenda, Chair Hulbert declared the meeting adjourned at 8:13 pm. 8 JKeprios @ci.edina.mn.us I www.EdinaParks.com ...For Living, Learning, Raising Families & Doing Business - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Felix Pronove [ mailto :felixpronove @comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 20112:22 PM To: John Keprios Cc: keeya. steel @yahoo.com; randyameyer @aol.com; ausdummer @gmail.com; wel2two @gmail.com; danlnan @aol.com; david. deeds@ gmail.com;.ellen.jones @mac.com; clarencebeeks @hotmail.com; Imsegreto @msn.com; morethanthislife @yahoo.com;.tfronek @yahoo.com Subject: Park Board meeting.tonight Hello Mr. Keprios and fellow Park'B'oard members, Unfortunately I cannot make it to the Park Board meeting tonight. However, I have read the,packet and thought I might share my observations from the viewpoint of a student. Working groups -1 think working groups on naming rights and user fees sound like a good idea. About the Sports Dome idea - I know that as a high school student who likes to golf, play baseball, and play Ultimate Frisbee, that it is very hard to find field space in the spring (and winter, but it is definitely noticeable in March and April). The unpredictable condition of outdoor fields has meant that seasons get delayed, and a lot of practices and games are cancelled. It is very frustrating for spring sports participants. So having a domed facility would probably mean more time playing time for students in the spring. One option I hope will be considered is combining the existing golf dome with a covered field. About Capital Improvements and my experience as a high school student this year with Edina park facilities.. I only visited the pool once, but I believe a lot of high school kids would visit the pool to use a flowrider while enjoying the pool A lot of high school students use the frisbee golf course at Rosland. High school students use playground equipment to play night games like Blind Man's Bluff. High school students use the mini golf course at Centennial Lakes, but the price is kind of high. I also did not think the,greens were in bad shape. . I can see that an additional restroom at Centennial Lakes would be nice. High school students love the free movies in the park on Thursdays. As an 18 year old, l golfed a.lot at.Braemar this summer because the youth fee includes 18 year olds, and that made.it cheaper than other public courses. A lot of my friends got jobs working for city parks-this winter and summer and I know many of them are very grateful that the city helps so many kids get good local jobs. I very much enjoyed serving on the Park Board this year and I am proud to live in a city that has such a great park system. Thank you, Felix Pronove • 1, - - -- MINUTES CITY OF EDINA.MINNESOTA ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION EDINA CITY HALL COMMUNITY ROOM Thurs., Aug 11, 2011 7:07 PM I. CALL TO ORDER Chair Latham called the meeting to order at 7:07 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Answering roll call were Members lyer, Kata, Kostuch, Paterlini, Pronove, Risser, Sierks, Thompson, Tucker and Chair Latham. Absent: Members Gubrud and Zarrin Staff Present: Jesse Struve and Rebecca Foster III. APPROVAL OF MEETING AGENDA Agenda was approved as written. IV. ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Motion made by Member Kostuch approving the consent agenda. Motion carried unanimously. V. COMMUNITY COMMENT Nick Kelso, 1465 Harvest Ln, Shakopee, Jet Black Owner, not in favor of the coal tar banning ordinance, because the asphalt replacement doesn't last as long. Don Dahlstrom, 627 Carverlust Pkwy, Carver, Jet Black Owner, not in favor of the coal tar banning ordinance, because he'll loose business. Matt Cabrera, 14021 NW Azurite St, Ramsey, Advance Brothers, not in favor of the coal tar banning ordinance. VI. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. Working Group members. Water Quality Working Group Chair Tucker requested that Todd Doroff be deleted from the Water Quality Working Group. Motion made by Member Risser and seconded by Member Thompson to approve Ray O'Connell to the Air Quality Working Group and delete Todd Doroff from the Water Quality Working Group. Motion carried unanimously. Chair Latham thanked Mr. Doroff for his service. B. Water Quality WG 1. Proposed Coal Tar ordinance. This agenda item has been tabled to the September Stn meeting in order to receive more studies about coal tar effects from the members of the industry that spoke during public comment. Jesse Struve will ask City staff how the banning of coal tar within chip seal has affected the city streets. 2. Blue Star Municipal Stormwater Mgmt Assessment: Water Quality Working Group will review the questions where the city is scoring low. C. Recycling & Solid Waste WG. EEC Members have been invited to tour a Portable Biodigester on Tuesday, August 161h 1. Refuse Report and ordinance. The report has been sent to Haulers for their comments. 2. City -wide facility recycling policy 0 i Motion made by Member Sierks and seconded by Member Thompson for the city to establish a city -wide facility recycling policy stating that only compostable tableware will be used, that bottle water will be reduced, and that organic composting will be implemented. Motion carried unanimously. D. 7 -31 -11 Eco Yard & Garden tour. The event was successful with net proceeds of $1,058.00 to go towards trees, speaker or education, for example. E. Turf Management Task Force. The ?ark Board and Community Health Commission are currently reviewing the Task Force report. Member Paterlini will contact Vince Cockriel and ask him what medians are sprayed near sidewalks. F. Education Outreach Working Group Report. A few Members attended six Nite to Unite parties. Motion made by Member Thompson and seconded by Member Tucker to, approve the EEC to become a community partner with Moving.Planet on Saturday, September 24th. Motion carried unanimously. 1. October educational program Motion made by Member-Tucker and seconded by Member Paterlini requesting Member Thompson and Member Zarrin to create a proposal for an event that the EEC will sponsor about Sustainability in October. Motion carried unanimously. 2. Public Works native plant landscaping 3. Eco Film Festival Motion made by Member lyer and seconded by Member Thompson for Chair Latham to contact Tom Shirley at.Centennial Lakes to see if there's a cost involved with the EEC to host Eco, Health and Human Rights films during the summer at the Metzold Amphitheater. Motion carried unanimously. G. City Website. No Report. H. EEC Website. No Report. I. GreenStep Cities. Review Comp Plan documentation. J. City Council Work Session. The work session will be Tuesday, September 20th at 5:00 P.M. The agenda will be finalized at the September 8th EEC'Meeting. K. Energy WG 1. Solar panel project. Chair Latham recapped why the EEC declined the previous solar panel bid. The City Manager has addressed all of the EEC concerns and decided to remove all of the other city facility improvements and will just focus on the solar panel and had McKinstry create a new RFP process. McKinstry presented the new bid results. Motion made by Member lyer and seconded by Member Sierks to approve the TenK Solar Panel bid results. Roll Call was taken: Ayes: lyer, Risser, Sierks, Thompson, Latham, Nays: Kostuch, Paterlini, Tucker Motion Carried. 2. Solar /wind ordinance amendments Task Force. No Report. 3. PACE commercial energy district. The Report and Recommendation will be on,the August 16th Council Agenda and if approved city staff will develop a.local PACE program proposal-and then it will be presented to the EEC for their review and comment and then back to the City Council for their final review and consideration. Public Comment. Brad Hanson, 5908 Chapel Dr., Edina, in favor of third party bonding. Lynn Hinkle, Mpls, in favor of third party bonding due to great economic development. John Doll, address unknown, said no other city has implemented PACE and he would like Edina to be a leader. L. Air Quality WG 1. Drive Through Ordinance Amendments. Motion made by Member Paterlini and seconded by Member Tucker approving Drive Through Ordinance. Motion carried unanimously. 2. No Engine Idling Signs. Recommended that the No Idling signs will be hung on existing Smoke Free or future No Spray sign posts within city parks. Motion made by Member lyer and seconded by Member Tucker approving the "Turn Off Your Engine Breathe Better Save Money" sign. Motion carried unanimously. Motion made by Member lyer and seconded by Member Tucker approving the proposal for No Vehicle Idling Signs in Municipal Parks and Other Public Spaces. Motion carried unanimously. 3. Clean Air Act. The Clean Air and Your Health: The Power of EPA Actions and Federal Legislation Forum held August 10th at Edina Public Works was successful with approximately 50 in attendance. VII. CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS Vill. CHAIR AND COMMISSION MEMBER COMMENTS 1. Conflict of Interest Policy. Chair Latham reminded members about the conflict of interest policy for their Working Group members. IX. STAFF COMMENTS A. Jesse Struve 1. EEC budget. No Report. 2. ULI benchmark progress report. Member Paterlini requested to hear more about report, so Chair Latham suggested to move out of staff report onto Agenda for Sept. 8 meeting. 3. Green Corps Intern. Member Sierks said that the Green Step Program did get funded for three years and money could possibly be used for an intern. Member Thompson thanked Member Kata for service on EEC. Member Kata will begin at Harvard in the fall. The work of student Member. Pronove was also appreciated this past year. There being no further business on the Commission Agenda, Chair Latham declared the meeting adjourned at 9:49 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Rebecca Foster GIS Administrator