HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-02-20_COUNCIL MEETINGM
EDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING PROCEDURES
During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public comment after City staff members make their
presentations. If you wish to speak on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your comments are
relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a
public hearing, speakers must observe the f6110717ing guidelines:
• Individuals must limit their presentations to three minutes. The Mayor will modify presentation
times, as deemed necessary.
• Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit comments to the
matter under consideration.
• In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs,
clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not
allowed.
During "Public Comments, the Mayor will ask to Bear from those in attendance who mould like to
speak about something not on the agenda. Individuals must limit their presentations. to three minutes
and cannot speak to an issue for which a public hearing was previously held and closed or a matter
scheduled for a future hearing. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their
comments. Instead, the Council might direct the matter. to staff for consideration at a future meeting.
AGENDA
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
FEBRUARY 20, 2007
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL
ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the
Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All
agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are
considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion
of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases
the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on
the Agenda.
EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of February 6, 2007
II. ADTOURNMENT
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
* I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of February 6, 2007, Special Meeting
of February 6, 2007
II. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS - Affidavits of Notice by
Clerk. Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If
Council wishes to proceed, action by resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote of all
Agenda /Edina City Council
February 20, 2007
Page 2
members of the Council required to pass if improvement is petitioned for; 4/5
favorable rollcall -if no petitions.
Rollcall A. IMPROVEMENT HEARING - Roadway Improvement No. BA -336 - West 70th
Street - France Avenue to York Avenue
III. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Zoning
Ordinances: ,First Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three Council members
except that a rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative
votes. Second Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three of Council to pass
except rezoning from residential to non- residential requires four affirmative votes.
Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall votes of four members of. Council to
pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District:
Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required passing. Conditional Use
Permit: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required to pass. Variance
Appeal: Favorable rollcall of Council Members present to uphold or deny appeal
Rollcall A. PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT -City of Edina /Edina Fire
Department, 6250 Tracy Avenue
Rollcall B. PUBLIC HEARING - ORDINANCE NO. 2007 -03 - Amending Section 850 of
Edina City Code Regarding Variance Denials
Rollcall C. PUBLIC HEARING - PRELIMINARY PLAT - Haugland Company, 5000 France
Avenue
Rollcall D. PUBLIC HEARING - 2007 Community Development Block Grant Program
IV. PUBLIC COMMENT
V. ORDINANCES - First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading:
Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading:
Affirmative vote of four Council Members to pass.
Rollcall A. ORDINANCE NO. 2007 -04 - Ordinance Amending Subsection 460.03 Subd. 1
Construction Maintenance and Repair and Subd. 14 Address Signs
VI. AWARD OF BID
* A. 4 X 2 Pick -Up Truck - Braemar Golf Course
* B. 13 Golf Cars - Braemar Golf Course
C. Improvement No. LS -36 - 72nd Street Lift Station Renovation
Agenda /Edina City Council
February 20, 2007
Page 3
VII. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS
A. Resolution Accepting Various Donations
B. Set Public Improvement Hearing Date (3/20/07) - Improvement No. BA -340
Todd Park Roadway Improvement
C. Ground Lease - Cellular Equipment - Garden Park
D. Ground Lease - Cellular Equipment - Highland Park - Continued to 3/6/07
E. Appointments to Fill Vacancies on Various Boards
VIII. FINANCE
A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated February
7, 2007, TOTAL $1,117,402.82; and February 14, 2007, TOTAL $1,158,994.68.
B. SECOND READING - ORDINANCE NO. 2007 -02 Amending Commercial/
Industrial Water Utility Rates
C. FINANCIAL POLICIES
IX. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS
X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS
XI. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM
The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If
you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print
documents or something else, please call 952-927-886172 hours in advance of the meeting.
Tues
Feb 27
Tues
Mar 6
Tues
Mar 20
Tues
Mar 27
Tues
Apr 3
Tues
Apr 17
Tues
April 24
Tues
May 1
Tues
May 15
Tues
May 22
Mon
May 28
SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS
Study Session
11:30 A.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Study Session
11:30 A.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Study Session
11:30 A.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Regular Meeting
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Study Session
11:30 A.M.
COMMUNITY ROOM
MEMORIAL DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall
Closed
MINUTES
OF THE
EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
FEBRUARY 6, 2007
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Housh, Masica, and Chair
Hovland.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Masica and
seconded by Commissioner Housh approving the Consent Agenda for the Edina Housing
and Redevelopment Authority as presented.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Hovland
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND
REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR JANUARY 16, 2007, APPROVED Motion made
by Commissioner Masica and seconded by Commissioner Housh approving the Minutes of
the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for January 16,
2007.
Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes.
There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda,
Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned.
Executive Director
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
FEBRUARY 6, 2007
7:00 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Housh, Masica, and Mayor Hovland.
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Masica and
seconded by Member Housh approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented with
the exception of Agenda Item III.B., Lot Division - United Health Group - 9900 Bren Road.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Hovland
Motion carried.
*MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF TANUARY 16, 2007, SPECIAL MEETING
OF JANUARY 16, 2007, AND STUDY SESSION OF JANUARY 23, 2007APPROVED
Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh approving the Minutes
of the Regular Meeting of January 16, 2007, Special Meeting of January 16, 2007, and Study
Session of January 23, 2007, as presented.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
THANKS GIVEN TO THE CITY BY EDINA BASKETBALL ASSOCIATION Steve
Spellman, President of the Edina Basketball Association read a letter of thanks from the
Association for the new gymnasiums saying how much they were necessary and were now
being used. Dick Ward, Past President of the Basketball Association, thanked Council
Member Housh, member of the JPOC, and Park and Recreation for their commitment to the
project. They presented the Park Department with a 35th Anniversary commemorative
basketball and a framed 35th Anniversary t- shirt.
MINNESOTA RECREATION AND PARK ASSOCIATION AWARDS PRESENTED TO
PARK DIRECTOR KEPRIOS AND ADAPTIVE RECREATION SUPERVISOR MILLER
Michelle Snider, Executive Director of the Minnesota Recreation and Parks Association
(MRPA) presented the 2006 Dorthea Nelson Award to Susie Miller, Adaptive Recreation
Supervisor. Ms. Snider said Ms. Miller was selected for the award because she exemplified
leadership and experience qualities in her field of recreation.
Ms. Snider presented Park Director Keprios with the 2006 Clifton E. French Distinguished
Service Award. She explained the award was the highest distinction award presented by the
MRPA to a professional who has demonstrated long and outstanding service to the
profession and the MRPA.
RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -23, VACATION OF DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT
APPROVED LOT 1, BLOCK 2, BRAEMAR HILLS 8TH ADDITION APPROVED Affidavits
of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file.
Page 1
Minutes/Edina City Council/FebruaU 6, 2007
Engineer Houle explained the vacation of existing public drainage and utility easement for
Braemar Hills 811, Addition affected the newly platted Lot 1, 2, and 3, Block 1 of Hills of
Braemar subdivision. He explained a blanket easement had existed over all of Outlot A and
the new plat included three new buildable lots and a new Outlot A (common area). Mr.
Houle said the new plat had not removed the original blanket easement creating a need to
vacate and rededicate the entire blanket easement.
No one appeared to speak.
Member Masica made a motion, seconded by Member Housh closing the Public Hearing.
Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Hovland
Motion carried.
Member Masica introduced Resolution No. 2007 -23 Vacating. Drainage and Utility
Easement for Lot 1, Block 2, Braemar Hills 81h Addition. Member Housh seconded the
motion.
Rollcall:
Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Hovland
Motion carried.
*PUBLIC HEARING - FINAL DEVELOPMENT. PLAN, DTR ARCHITECTS/TOM MILLER
(3201 -3101 69TH STREET WEST) SITE REDEVELOPMENT CONTINUED TO MARCH 6,
2007 Motion made_ by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh approving the
public hearing for the Final Development Plan, DJR Architects[rom Miller (3201 -3101 69th
Street West) site redevelopment be continued until March 6, 2007.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -24 APPROVING LOT DIVISION - UNITED HEALTH GROUP
- 9900 BREN ROAD Member Bennett asked that Resolution No. 2007 -24 approving the Lot
Division for United Health Group at 9900 Bren Road be removed from the Consent Agenda
for further information.
Member Bennett indicated she had received a call from a resident inquiring- if a traffic study
had been a part of the lot division and whether it was valid and could impact Edina. Mr.
Houle noted that the City did not require a formal traffic study.
Director Teague said the project was a City of Minnetonka project and that an Environmental
Assessment Worksheet (EAW) and a traffic study had been a part of that EAW. The project
was for two, 10 -story office buildings. He said one phase would require minor roadway
improvements in the Opus Complex and the second phase would require some adjustments
to the on -ramp. Mr. Houle reiterated that the interchange at Highway 169 had been studied
and the Parkwood Knolls area will continue to be monitored. He added staff would work
with the City of Minnetonka and State of Minnesota to address any citizens' concern.
Member Housh noted that Edina's part of the overall project was small and he questioned
what type of input we might have. Attorney Gilligan said when Minnetonka did the EAW;
concerns could have been brought forward. The project has been approved by Minnetonka
and input was limited at this point.
Page 2
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 6, 2007
Mayor Hovland said the strip of land lies in Minnetonka and he believed we should trust our
neighbors.
Member Housh made a motion approving Resolution No. 2007 -24, Lot Division for United
Health Group at 9701 Data Park Drive. Member Masica seconded the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Masica, Hovland
Nays: Bennett
Motion carried.
*HEARING DATE SET OF FEBRUARY 20, 2007, FOR PLANNING MATTERS Motion
made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh setting February 20, 2007, as
hearing date for the following planning matters:
1. Conditional Use Permit approval - City of Edina/Edina Fire 'Department - 6250
Tracy Avenue;
2. Ordinance No. 2007 -03, Amending Section 850 of City Code Regarding Variance
Denials; and
3. Preliminary Plat Approval - Haugland Company, 5000 France Avenue
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
PUBLIC COMMENT No one appeared to speak.
*AWARD OF BID FOR THREE 2007 CHEVROLET MALIBU INSPECTION VEHICLES -
BUILDING DEPARTMENT Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member
Housh approving the award of bid for three 2007 Chevrolet Malibu Inspection Vehicles
for the Building Department to Car/`Truck City at $38,417.40, under State Contract #436647.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*AWARD OF BID FOR TWO, THREE WHEEL DRIVE BUNKER RAKES - BRAEMAR
GOLF COURSE Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh
approving the award of bid for two, three -wheel drive bunker rakes for Braemar Golf
Course to recommended low bidder, Turf Werks, at $17,275.90.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*AWARD OF BID FOR ONE ARTICULATED TRACKLESS SIDEWALK PLOW WITH
ATTACHMENTS FOR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Motion made by Member
Masica and seconded by Member Housh for award of bid for one articulated trackless
sidewalk plow with attachments for the Public Works Department to recommended sole
bidder, MacQueen Equipment Company under State Contract #430811 at $95,778.65.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*AWARD OF BID FOR UTILITY TRACTOR FOR PARK MAINTENANCE
DEPARTMENT Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh for
award of bid for a utility tractor for the Park Maintenance Department to recommended
sole bidder, john Deere Company, under Minnesota State Contract Bid #43791, at
$32,908.50.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
Page 3
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 6, 2007
*AWARD OF BID FOR JOHN DEERE MOWER FOR PARK MAINTENANCE
DEPARTMENT Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh for
award of bid for one John Deere Mower for the Park Maintenance Department to
recommended sole bidder, John Deere Company, under Minnesota State Contract Bid
#436931,,at $16,362.92.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
BID AWARDED FOR CONTRACT NO. ENG 07 -1 - PUMPING FACILITY
MAINTENANCE FOR WELL NO. 10, IMPROVEMENT NO. WM -467 Mr. Houle explained
Well No. 10, located at 7636 Parklawn Avenue was scheduled for general overhaul and
renovation. The project was part of the Capital Improvement Program and would include
mechanical and electrical upgrades to Treatment Plant No. .3 and 4 due to additional
treatment required at these plants. He said the improvement would.be funded'by the Water
Utility Fund.
Member Masica inquired whether only one bid was received. Mr. Houle noted the bid from
EnComm Midwest was received on time for the bid opening and a second bid arrived too
late to be considered.
Motion made by Member Masica approving the bid award for Contract No. ENG. 07 -1,
Pumping Facility Maintenance for Well No. 10, Improvement No. WM467, to
recommended sole bidder EnComm Midwest, Inc., at $247,247.00. Member Housh seconded
the motion.
Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Hovland
Motion carried.
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-20 APPROVED. LOCAL GOVERNMENT'S SUSTAINABILITY -
CITIES FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION Assistant Manager Worthington noted at the
Council meeting on January 16, 2007, staff was asked to review information on ICLEI (Local
Governments for Sustainability) Cities for Climate Protection Campaign and the U.S. Mayors
Climate Protection Agreement endorsing resolution. A staff review of the requirements for
ICLEI membership was ongoing.
Ms. Worthington elaborated that Local Governments for Sustainability membership was
separate from the endorsement of the resolution regarding the U.S. Mayors Climate
Protection Agreement and has requirements as follows:
1. Conduct a baseline emissions inventory and forecast
2. Adopt an emissions reduction target
3. Develop a local action plan
4. Implement emission reduction measures and policies
5. Monitor and verify results
A full presentation.about ICLEI Membership will be on a March Council Agenda following a
thorough assessment of resource needs by the City.
Ms. Worthington encouraged the Council to endorse the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection
Agreement by passing Resolution No. 2007 -20 which was previously adopted at the 73rd
Annual Conference in Chicago in 2005. Participating cities commit to the following:
Page 4
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 6, 2007
• Strive to meet /beat Kyoto Protocol targets through measures such as anti- sprawl land -
use policies, urban forest restoration and /or public information campaigns;
• Urge state and federal government to enact policies/ programs to meet /beat
greenhouse gas emission reduction targets - 7% from 1990 levels by 2012; and
• Urge U.S. Congress to pass bipartisan greenhouse gas reduction legislation which
would establish a national emission trading system.
Member Masica asked for further information on the Kyoto Protocol. Ms. Worthington said
she would provide that information. Member Masica inquired whether the proposed
formation of an Environmental Commission would have this as their. basis. Mayor Hovland
commented that would be a good beginning. Member Masica asked what the economic
impact would be if the City adopted the resolution. Ms. Worthington said upon examination
of the document there did not appear to be any economic impact.
Edina High Schools project EARTH group included Kaitlin Johnson, 5221 Duggan Plaza; Jake
Brownell 4505 Casco; Annisa Antar, 4428 Garrison Lane; Ian Nelson, 4505 Garrison Lane and
Jennifer Heinzel, 6337' Wilryan Avenue. The group urged the Council to approve the
resolution and presented a petition with approximately 400 signatures from Edina residents
in favor of approving the resolution.
Paul Thompson, 4244 Crocker Avenue, congratulated the Project EARTH group and pledged
his support.
Member Bennett shared a list of Ten Minnesota Cities that had adopted similar resolutions.
She commented that items on the list of suggested actions were both too vague and too
specific, and that approving the resolution was a good "first step' rather than adoption of an .
action plan.
Member Masica introduced Resolution No. 2007 -20 - Local Governments for
Sustainability - Cities for Climate Protection and moved its adoption. Member Bennett
seconded the motion.
Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Hovland
Motion carried.
NEW WINE AND BEER LICENSES APPROVED FOR COOKS OF CROCUS HILL Mr.
Hughes said the Cooks of Crocus Hill, Inc., made application for a new wine and 3.2 beer
liquor license allowing them to service wine in conjunction with cooking classes offered at
their Edina location at 3925 West 50th Street. The application has been reviewed by the
Planning, Health and Police Department with no negative findings. It was suggested since
the license term was so near, that it run for 13 1/2 months or until the end of March 2008.
Member Masica inquired if a separate license would better serve the applicant as wine was
not being served in a restaurant setting but as a part of a teaching facility. Mr. Hughes.said
the City issued licenses as allowed by Minnesota Statute and he would check into the
possibility of a different class of license at this location. He suggested issuing the license as
requested.
Page 5
Minutes/Edina City Couricil /February 6, 2007
Member Masica made a motion approving the new wine and beer license for Cooks of
Crocus Hill for 13 1/z months or until the end of March 2008. Member Housh seconded the
motion.
Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Hovland
Motion carried.
*HIGHLAND PARK CELL TOWER CONTINUED TO FEBRUARY 20, 2007 Motion made
by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh to continue the Highlands Park Cell
Tower issue to February 20, 2007.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
REAPPOINTMENTS MADE TO HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD Mayor Hovland
noted that at the January 16, 2007, meeting, reappointments to the Heritage Preservation
Board were continued to allow one member who was serving on two boards to decide which
board that they wished to continue serving. He reported the decision left. an opening I on the
Heritage Preservation Board which had been advertised.
Mayor Hovland made a motion to reappoint Lou Blemaster, Karen Ferrara, and Bob
Kojetin to the Heritage Preservation Board for terms to February 1, 2010. Member Bennett
seconded the motion.
Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Hovland
Motion carried.
*2007 BRAEMAR INSPECTION TOUR DATE SET - JULY 9, 2007 Member Masica made a
motion setting Monday, July 9, 2007, for the 42nd Annual Braemar Inspection Tour,
seconded by Member Housh.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -19 ACCEPTING. VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland
explained in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted
by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations.
Member Housh introduced Resolution No. 2007 -19 accepting various donations and
moved its adoption. Member Bennett seconded the motion.
Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Hovland
Motion carried.
J
*RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -21 ACCEPTING HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT FOR
EDINA FIRE DEPARTMENT Member Masica introduced Resolution No. 2007 -21,
seconded by Member Housh and moved adoption authorizing acceptance of grant funds
from the State of Minnesota, Department of Public Safety, Division of Homeland Security
and Emergency Management.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
*ANNUAL APPOINTMENT OF WEED INSPECTOR Motion made. by Member Masica
and seconded by Member Housh approving the annual appointment of Vince Cockriel as
Assistant Weed Inspector for calendar year 2007.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
Page 6
Minutes/Edina City Council/FebruAa 6, 2007
*RATIFY EDINA SCHOOL BOARD APPOINTMENTS TO EDINA HUMAN RIGHTS
AND RELATIONS COMMISSION Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by.
Member Housh ratifying the School Districts appointment at their January 22, 2007,
meeting, to the Human Rights and Relations Commission of two members, Emery
Erickson and Amy Frankfurt for terms to February 1, 2010.
. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
LOCAL 49 BARGAINING UNIT CONTRACT FOR 2007, 2008, 2009 APPROVED Mr.
Hughes explained the Public Works and Park Maintenance Local 49 Bargaining Unit contract
for 2007, 2008, and 2009. He outlined particulars of the agreement and recommended
approval.
Following a brief discussion, Member Housh made a motion approving Local 49 Bargaining
Unit contract for 2007, 2008, and 2009 for Public Works and Park Maintenance. Member
Bennett seconded the motion.
Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Hovland
Motion carried.
*RESOLUTION N.O. 2007 -25 HEARING DATE SET OF MARCH 6, 2007, FOR CONCORD
AVENUE ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS - IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -331 Member
Masica introduced Resolution No. 2007 -25 setting March 6, 2007, as hearing date for
Concord Avenue Roadway Improvement - Improvement No. BA -331, seconded by
Member Housh.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES: PRESENTATION ON
PROPOSED REGIONAL SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Mr. Houle
explained that the regional sanitary sewer serving the southerly two- thirds of Edina has had
capacity issues for many years. The Metropolitan Council of Environmental Services (MCES)
has completed a study of the I-494 corridor planning area, which included upgrading the
regional sanitary sewer. Mr. Houle said staff has worked with MCES on the project and was
pleased with the accelerated study schedule and the potential improvements to the system.
He noted MCES anticipated a construction start by spring 2008 with completion by spring
2010.
Bill Cook, Engineering and Planning Manager for the Metropolitan Council Environmental
Services presented an Executive Summary including the purpose and objective of the
Edina /Richfield Interceptor Improvements Preliminary Engineering Report for the regional
interceptor system in the I -494 Corridor planning area that will provide a long -term solution
for wastewater conveyance. Mr. Cook spoke of the ongoing and future development that will
require expansion of the interceptor system where capacity was maximized and about the
conditions of the existing system. He elaborated on several gravity and pump station /force
main alternatives that were evaluated to convey Edina /Richfield flow from Meter M129 to
Cedar Avenue. Mr. Cook recommended that a gravity relief interceptor be implemented and
gave his rationale his recommendation.
Page 7
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 6, 2007
Council members asked questions regarding the need and reason for the improvement,
responsibility for financing the project, how large a population the project would could serve
and about any potential environmental - impact of the project. Mr. Cook answered the
questions.
Russ Susag, District 5, Metropolitan Council Representative, explained funding for projects
such as these came from state and federal funds. He added the building of the treatment
plant/ sewers was charged to the communities on the basis of usage.
No formal Council action was taken.
CITY MANAGER PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL PRESENTED; APPROVED Mayor
Hovland reminded the Council that a composite of comments and recommendations
received from them had been forwarded to them about the City Manager's performance. He
recommended acceptance of the 3 %increase in salary effective January!l, 2007.
Member Masica questioned whether, the City Manager's salary cap was still governed by the
Governor's salary. Mr. Hughes responded there- was a different formula involved in
comparing salaries and grows with a cost of living adjustment.
Mayor Hovland made a motion accepting the Performance Appraisal of the City Manager
and recommended authorizing a 3% increase in salary effective January 1, 2007. Member
Masica seconded the motion.
Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Hovland
Motion carried.
*CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Member Masica made a motion and Member
Housh seconded the motion approving payment of the following claims as shown in
detail on the Check Register dated January 16, 2007, and consisting of 30 pages: General
Fund $148,918.77, CDBG Fund $3,000.00; Communications Fund $10,983.00, Working
Capital Fund $225,972.86; Art Center Fund $2,968.20; Golf Dome Fund $19,403.71; Aquatic
Center Fund $7,054.44; Golf Course Fund $17,998.39; Ice Arena Fund $12,127.62,
Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $8,609.69; Liquor Fund $153,003.08; Utility Fund
$384,101.74; Storm Sewer Fund $735.91; Recycling Fund $33,958.00; PSTF Agency Fund
$1,621.27, TOTAL $1,030,456.68; and for approval of payment of claims dated January 24,
2007, and consisting of 21 pages: General Fund $552,113.56; Communications Fund
$16,817.18; City Hall Debt Service $495.00; Working Capital Fund $804.02; Art Center Fund
$3,530.35; Golf Dome Fund $128.39; Aquatic Center Fund $119.74; Golf Course Fund
$5,399.04; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $17,585.45; Liquor Fund $125,144.89; Utility
Fund $27,773.55; Storm Sewer Fund $12,832.00; TOTAL $762,743.17; and for approval of
payment of claims dated January 31, 2007, and consisting of 32 pages: General Fund
$471,622.52; Communications Fund $4,702.14; Working Capital Fund $54,359.80; Art Center
Fund $10,207.57; Golf Dome Fund $876.66; Aquatic Center Fund $382.00; Golf Course Fund
$8,794.57, Ice Arena Fund $3,818.09; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $18,099.62;
Liquor Fund $107,061.99; Utility Fund $29,601.00; Recycling Fund $20.00; PSTF Agency
Fund $2,037.94; TOTAL $711,583.90.
Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.
Page 8
Minutes/Edina City Council/February 6, 2007
RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -22 APPROVED - AMENDING THE 2007 OPERATING
BUDGET Mr. Hughes indicated when Council salaries were increased by Ordinance in
October, the increase was not reflected in the budget adopted on December 16, 2006. He
recommended approval of Resolution No. 2007 -22 Amending the Budget for 2007.
Member Masica made a motion approving Resolution No. 2007 -22 Amending the 2007
Operating Budget for 2007. Member Bennett seconded the motion.
Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Hovland
Motion carried.
FIRST READING GRANTED TO ORDINANCE NO. 2007 -02 AMENDING SCHEDULE
185A WATER RATES Director Wallin presented Ordinance No. 2007 -0, amending utility
fees and charges proposed for 2007 for commercial and industrial properties. Under the
Ordinance approving utility rate increases on January 16, 2007, the commercial and industrial
water rate was set at the same three tiered rate as residential. Due to volume, the Commercial
and Industrial property use, most water used by these properties would be at the highest tier
leaving large increases along with increases in storm water fees. Previously, a discussion was
held on the Commercial and Industrial lawn watering and the Ordinance reflected these
amendments.
Member Masica asked if a comparison was done to other cities. Mr. Wallin said fourteen
cities responded to surveys. He gave detailed survey results. On average, the rates ranged
from $1.15 to $1.56 on a tiered system.
Mr. Hughes noted the Ehler's rate study assumed the City would use the lowest rate for
Commercial and Industrial properties
Member Housh made a motion granting First Reading to Ordinance No. 2007 -02, Utility
Fees - Commercial and Industrial. Member Masica seconded the motion.
Member Bennett stated that the two reasons given by the Ehlers report for adoption of a
three -tier system, encouragement of conservation and allocation of system costs to heaviest
users, should apply equally to commercial and industrial and residential users. Following a
the discussion, Mayor Hovland called for a vote on the motion.
Ayes: Housh, Masica, Hovland
Nay: Bennett
First Reading granted.
There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the
meeting adjourned at 9:13 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Page 9
City Clerk
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL WORK SESSION
OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL
HELD AT CITY HALL
FEBRUARY 6, 2007
5:20 P.M.
ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Housh, Masica and Chair Hovland.
Staff present included, Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Heather Worthington, Assistant City
Manager; Ceil Smith, Assistant to the City Manager; John Wallin, Finance Director; Eric
Roggeman, Assistant Finance Director; Wayne Houle, City Engineer; Jennifer Bennerotte,
Communications Director; and Darlene Wallin, Administration Secretary.
Director Wallin indicated that Standard & Poor's (S & P) recently released its new Financial
Management Assessments Criteria. S & P will provide its traditional bond rating, along with an
assessment of financial management — rated strong, standard or vulnerable. S & P introduced the
Financial Management Assessments Criteria making policies and practices more transparent that
are considered most critical to credit quality. S & P, in order to perform the analysis, will rely on
documentation provided by the City and with the organization's management.
The Finance Department, has, recommended tightening some of the City's financial policies in
order to protect the City's AAA and Aaa bond ratings. Mr. Wallin noted the City's objective was
to mitigate credit risk and interest rate risk with adjustments to the investment policies. He noted
that highlights of proposed changes to the financial policies would include additions to budgetary
controls and fund balance policies.
The legal level of budgetary control is located within the General Fund. The City Manager may
approve budgetary transfers and the Council may approve supplemental appropriations.
Mr. Wallin noted at the end of the fiscal year, unreserved designated fund balance would be
maintained for Compensated Absences of 40 percent of the actual full - accrual General Fund
liability. The City at that point would maintain unreserved designated fund balances for cash
flow in a range equal to 40 -45 percent of the subsequent year's budgeted tax revenue. If the
amount should fall below that range, the City would create a plan to restore funds to an
appropriate level. The policy indicated when the actual amount designed for cash flow falls
above the range; excess funds automatically would be transferred to the revolving Construction
Fund to support capital improvements. Mr. Hughes noted formal acceptance of the Financial
Policies would be on the agenda at a future regular Council meeting.
Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:30 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item #
II. A.
From: Wayne D. Houle, PE
Consent
❑
City Engineer
Information Only
❑
Date: February 20, 2007
Mgr. Recommends
❑ To HRA
Subject: Public Hearing for West 70th
® To Council
Street Roadway
Action
® Motion
Improvements -
® Resolution
Improvement No. BA -336
❑ Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
If the Council determines the project to be warranted and necessary, Council shall adopt a
resolution approving the West 70th Street Roadway Improvements, City Improvement No. BA -336,
and authorize plans and specifications to be completed, and bids taken.
Info /Background:
Staff initiated this project because of the redevelopment that is occurring along the easterly end of
West 70th Street. The project involves reconstructing the roadway from France Avenue to York
Avenue from a current four -lane configuration to a two -lane configuration with roundabouts. Staff
has included an educational DVD on Roundabouts. Staff is proposing a construction start of spring
2007.
The Transportation Commission reviewed and approved the proposed option at their June 15, 2006
Transportation Commission Meeting, see attached minutes and report.
Attached, you will find the feasibility study for this project as prepared by WSB & Associates. The
estimated project cost is $1,614,300. The proposed special assessments for this project are
$753,373.24 and are based on combined residential equivalent unit and a 100% assessment for the
easterly roundabout. Monies received through the Municipal State Aid apportionments will fund the
remaining portion of the costs. The preliminary assessments are shown on the attached preliminary
assessment role.
Staff analyzed the project and feels that the project is feasible from an engineering standpoint.
G: \Engineering \Improvements \BA336 W. 70th from France to YorMADMIN\MISORR Public Hearing - BA336.doc
sv9l�lrl,
04 e'
Cn
N� O
v ay
STREET IMPROVEMENTS
WEST 701h STREET
FEBRUARY 14, 2007
LOCATION:
FEASIBILITY STUDY — BA -336
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CITY OF EDINA
West 70th Street extends from France Avenue to York Avenue as shown in
Figure 1 below.
_ r
1
EONE
Projed Locaf on
70th STREET
c W W,
o.., >
W W
ca+.. w
a. w
Figure 1. Proiect Location Map
INITIATION & ISSUES: The West 701h Street project was initiated as the result of safety and capacity
issues related to the redevelopment of the Target site and Westin
development next to the Galleria. Specific issues that will be address with the
project include
• Development Access
• Pedestrian Safety and Circulation
• Traffic Operations
• Improved Landscaping in the corridor
Feasibility Study
W. 70th Street Improvements — BA 336
February 14, 2007
EXISTING CONDITIONS: West 70`h Street between France Avenue and York Avenue is currently a four
lane undivided roadway with several property access locations. The roadway has
a posted speed limit of 30 MPH with no parking allowed on the roadway. The
following photo's illustrate the existing conditions.
��: - -��
Photo 1. Existing Galleria / New Westin Entrance
�f
� �'1ev yyyyyy 1
Photo 2. Existing Pedestrian Crossing at Promenade
Page 2 of 7
Feasibility Study
W. 701h Street Improvements — BA 336
February 14, 2007
ate'- i.'►L'�N P ��'� i °x
i
i�
1
Photo 3. US Bank / Brandon Square Entrance
Preliminary Concept Analysis
A preliminary alternative concept design and traffic operational analysis was
completed in June of 2006. A summary of the key finding from that report are
discussed below.
The main purpose for the redesign of West 701h Street is to improve safety
and insure satisfactory traffic operations now and in the future. West 701h
Street has a recorded 9,750 annual average daily traffic volume. Crash
information from Mn /DOT showed 29 crashes have occurred within a three -
year period or a crash rate of 7.2 crashes per million vehicle miles
(crashes /mvm). This figure is consistent with the metro average for a four -
lane undivided facility of 7.3 crashes /mvm. The proposed three -lane facility
will canalize vehicles into specific lanes, removing turning vehicles from the
thru lanes and reducing the number of overall crashes. As a three -lane
facility, the anticipated crash rate would be similar to the metro average of 6.0
crashes /mvm; a drop of about 18 %. A vehicle /pedestrian crash also occurred
near the entrance to Brandon Square on the south side of West 701h Street in
2004.
The redesign of West 701h Street is also consistent with prior planning in the
area. The Greater Southdale Area Land Use and Transportation Study was
completed in 2005. This study describes a concept for long -term planning of
the land use and transportation needs of the area. The concept proposes the
increase of pedestrian traffic along West 701h Street, connecting the retail
uses to the north to the residential properties to the south. The concepts
analyzed enhance the pedestrian environment by reducing the number of
lanes a pedestrian has to cross. In addition, a median barrier provides a
refuge, and allows the pedestrian to focus on one lane of traffic at a time.
Page 3 of 7
Feasibility Study
W. 70th Street Improvements — BA 336
February 14, 2007
As a proactive way to maximize roadway capacity and improve safety,
business accesses were combined within the new alignments. By actively
managing and controlling traffic through access control, agencies can keep
vehicular demand and roadway capacity in balance before congestion forms.
Near France Avenue, the accesses of the US Bank and Brandon Square
Sites were combined. Near York Avenue, the proposed Target has aligned
its access with the Westin Galleria to the north.
Three alternatives were analyzed for the project area: a standard two -lane
with turn lanes and two roundabout alternatives.
Alternative A — Two -Lane with Turn Lanes
This alternative provides for a two -lane facility with raised concrete medians
and turn lanes at all intersections. Two eastbound traffic lanes are provided
at France Avenue to allow more vehicles through the intersection. One lane
is dropped with a 1:30 taper beginning 150' away from France Avenue.
Alternative B — Two Roundabouts
This alternative includes two roundabouts accessing the businesses between
France Avenue and York Avenue. The roundabout nearest to France
Avenue combines the western access to the Galleria and the two businesses
to the south near France Avenue. The central access to the Galleria is
modified to a right -in /right -out. The other roundabout is at the eastern access
to the Galleria and the proposed Target.
Alternative C — Three Roundabouts
This alternative C includes three roundabouts accessing the businesses
between France Avenue and York Avenue. The access to the Westin
Galleria at the roundabout near France Avenue is removed, creating a three -
leg. roundabout at this location. In addition, full access is provided at the
central intersection with a three -leg roundabout.
Based upon the analysis found in the report, West 70th Street will operate as
a two -lane with turn lanes or roundabouts adequately in the existing and
future conditions. Additional results of the study included:
• As a two -lane facility with turn lanes, West 701h Street is anticipated to
have a reduction in vehicular crashes and improve pedestrian safety.
• The reduction of lanes -on West 70th Street enhances the pedestrian
environment, consistent with the concepts in the Greater Southdale
Area Land Use and Transportation Study.
• Business accesses were combined to improve capacity and safety
along the corridor in all alternatives.
• Near France Avenue, two thru lanes are provided for vehicles
eastbound 701h Street. The lanes begin to merge about 100' from the
intersection. This allows the intersection to operate efficiently while
fitting into the existing right -of -way.
Page 4 of 7
Feasibility Study
W. 70th Street Improvements — BA 336
February 14, 2007
• Signal operations at West 70th Street and York Avenue were adequate
for all conditions without the providing two thru lanes on West 70th
Street between York Avenue and the Galleria /Target entrance. This
allows width to provide an additional eastbound left -turn lane,
improving overall operations.
• In Alternative A, the left -turn bays into the commercial developments
were designed to accommodate the 95th percentile queue demand
during the p.m. peak hour.
• In order to improve signal operations, improvements will be required
at the intersections West 70th Street/France Avenue and West 701h
Street/York Avenue by year 2030. For purposes of this study, left -turn
lanes were added on the northbound and southbound lanes of France
Avenue and a right turn was added at to the northbound movement at
York Avenue in all the 2030 alternatives.
• In Alternative A, left- turning vehicles exiting the Galleria and Target
will experience delay as volumes increase on West 701h Street. This
location is not anticipated to meet signal warrants in the future, but the
location should be monitored in case traffic from the site is higher than
projected. By consolidating accesses at roundabouts, the operations
at the business accesses were improved to LOS A.
The study was presented to the City of Edina Transportation Commission on
June 12, 2006. The recommendation of the commission was to proceed with
Alternative C- Three roundabouts.
PROPOSED
IMPROVEMENTS: The proposed improvement project involves reconstruction of the existing
four lane roadway into a two lane roadway with three roundabouts as outlined
in Alternative C discussed above. The project also includes a bus pull out
between the Target / Westin roundabout and the roundabout at the second
Galleria access, as well as an improved street lighting. Several meetings
have been conducted with the adjacent property owners to discuss access
and to identify any issues related to the project. The proposed plan, based on
input from Transportation Commission and the property owners is shown
below in Figure 2.
Wliii ii 14
Figure 2. Proposed Project Layout
PRELIMINARY
'} (Itetl
1 "11
11, 64
Page 5 of 7
Feasibility Study
W. 70th Street Improvements — BA 336
February 14, 2007
7[rl:tESIZ,I r_-I"
& EASEMENTS The right -of -way along West 701h Street is typically 80 feet. Some additional
right -of -way and or easements will be required from adjacent property in
order to construct the new roundabouts and tie into existing parking lots.
Figure 3 below shows the right -of -way and /or easement required for the
project.
..r r
f �11�u ; ire 1 rlrl��WM ��
YFE! rT11TIQ7�
- VV `� • M 72
�-- - -- - T - --
- - -
I!I! I
r
f 111 {
it 11
PREL M NAR/
1, 0, 0 it
I — JLI i,,
_W
® ■Y
Figure 3. Right -Of -Way / Easements
I I
I M
FEASIBILITY: The proposed improvements as outlined in this study are found to be
necessary, cost — effective and feasible from an engineering stand point.
PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $1,614,371.23. The total cost includes
indirect costs of 15% for engineering and clerical costs and 7.5% for first year
finance costs. The estimated construction cost does not include right -of -way
costs or landscaping costs but does include a 20% contingency. Funding for
the entire project will be from a combination of special assessment and
Municipal State Aid funds.
ASSESSMENTS: A special assessment of $753,373.24 is proposed for this project. The
assessments will be levied against the benefiting adjacent properties, see
attached preliminary assessment role. The methodology used for these
assessments are:
1. The easterly roundabout and change in geometries to accommodate this
roundabout will be assessed at 100% to the adjoining properties. The
conditions set forth by the City Council during the redevelopment of these
parcels enables staff to impose these assessments.
Page 6 of 7
Feasibility Study
W. 70`h Street Improvements — BA 336
February 14, 2007
2. The westerly two thirds of the project will be assessed at 20% of the
Municipal State Aid cost per the recently adopted State Aid Assessment
Policy. The assessment will be based on a Residential Equivalent Unit
(REU) based on the existing land use of the properties, see attached
preliminary assessment role. The justification for the assessments is
based on the benefit received to the properties, which include the new
and improved roadway and accesses along with pedestrian safety
improvements along the roadway.
PROJECT SCHEDULE: The following schedule is feasible from an Engineering standpoint:
Council Orders Public Hearing ........... .........................January 23, 2007
Receive Feasibility Report .................................. :........ February 20, 2007
Public Hearing ........................... ............................... February 20, 2007
Bid Opening ............................. ............................... April 2007
Award Contract ............................. ............................May / June 2007
Begin, Construction ......................... ...........................June 2007
Complete Construction ........................ ........................October 2007
Page 7 of 7
TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 1,614,371.23
TOTAL REU ROADWAY COST $ 1,076,247.48
Total Assessable Cost $ 215,249.50
Total Assessable REU's $ 262.47
ASSESSABLE COST PER REU $ 820.09
Current Land Use Class
REU
Notes
Residential - Single Family Dwelling
1
1
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLE
0.8
1
Residential — Apartments, Condominiums,
Cooperatives, Nurseries, Convalescent Homes
0.5
1
Industrial
0.5
2,3
Office/Retail/Financial Institutions
1.5
2
Public Buildings - City
WEST 70TH STREET
2
Public Buildings - Schools
0.2
2
Churches
0,8
2
CITY OF EDINA
TAXPAYER ADDRESS
ASSESSABLE REU
STREET
PID #
STREET
BUSINESS
OWNER NAME
TAX PAYER NAME
ACCESS PTS
ACCESS TO
GROSS BLDG AREA
COST SPLIT OF
TOTAL
NO.
NAME
STREET CITY /ST21P FROM SITE
ROADWAY
(GBA)
TOTAL REU ASSESSMENT
TARGETIWESTIN
ASSESSMENT
West 70th Street
2902824330018
3460
Galleria
Gabbert & Gabbert Co
Gabbert & Gabbert Co
3510 70th Street West Edina, MN 55435 9
2
COST
ENTRANCE
COST
3202824220004
3501
Brandon Square
Brandon Sq Partners II LLP
Brandon Square Company
321 University Ave SE Minneapolis, MN 55414 1
1
364730
121.58 $
99.703.97
$ 269,061.87
$ 368,765.84
First Building Corporation
48213
72.32 $
59,308.59
$ 59,308.59
France Avenue
3202824222001
7001
First Bank
First Building Corporation
C/O US Bank N A
2800 East Lake Street Minneapolis, MN 55408 1.5
1
3359
3.36 $
2,754.69
$ 2,754.69
First Building Corporation
3202824220003
7025
First Bank
First Building Corporation
C/O US Bank N A
2800 East Lake Street Minneapolis, MN 55406 1.5
1
65215
65.22 $
53,482.25
$
York Avenue
3202824210002
7000
1 Target
Dayton Hudson Corporation
Target Corporation T-0047
C/O Property Tax Dept
PO Box 9456 TPN -0950 Minneapolis, MN 55440 3
0
53,482.25
1965001
0.001s
-
$ 269,061.87
$ 269,061.87
TOTALS
$
TOTAL PROJECT COST $ 1,614,371.23
TOTAL REU ROADWAY COST $ 1,076,247.48
Total Assessable Cost $ 215,249.50
Total Assessable REU's $ 262.47
ASSESSABLE COST PER REU $ 820.09
Current Land Use Class
REU
Notes
Residential - Single Family Dwelling
1
1
Residential - Two Family, Duplexes, Quads
0.8
1
Residential — Apartments, Condominiums,
Cooperatives, Nurseries, Convalescent Homes
0.5
1
Industrial
0.5
2,3
Office/Retail/Financial Institutions
1.5
2
Public Buildings - City
0.9
2
Public Buildings - Schools
0.2
2
Churches
0,8
2
,VwJ 2. Per Gross Floor Area 1000 SF
3. All uses allowed in Planned Industrial Development (PID) except
offices and retail.
20070130 Prelim assessmentsBA3W.xls Pagel
CERTIFICATION
FEASIBILITY STUDY
BA -336
WEST 70Th STREET IMPROVEMENTS
CITY OF EDINA
WSB Project No 1686 -00
February 14, 2007
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was
prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a
duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
harles Rickart, P.E.
Date: February 14, 2007
701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
www.wsbeng.com
WSB
& Associates. Inc.
� 763.5414800 - Fax 763 - 541.1700
INFRASTRUCTURE i ENGINEERING i PLANNING i CONSTRUCTION
Lic. No. 26082
-wr -- -y"
TO: Transportation Commissioners
From: Steven Lillehaug S�_
Assistant City Engineer
Subject: West 70th Street (France Ave.
to York Ave.) Access and
Safety Improvements
Regular Transportation
Commission Meeting
Date: June 15, 2006
Agenda Item No.: II.a.
® Recommendation /Motion
❑ Information
❑ Discussion
Recommendation /Motion:
Staff recommends the Transportation Commission adopt the followin& motion: "The
Transportation Commission supports Concept Alternative 3 for West 70 Street between
France and York Avenues (the three - roundabout option) and recommends staff proceed with
preparing a feasibility study and plans / specifications for these roadway improvements.
Information /Background:
The City initiated a traffic study that analyzes potential geometric improvements,
operational issues, access issues and safety improvements to assist in developing
roadway concepts for West 70th Street from France Avenue to York Avenue in response
to the recent West 70th Street area re- development applications received by the City.
WSB & Associates, Inc. completed three concept layouts incorporating channelizing,
access, operational, safety and pedestrian improvements to the corridor. Staff met with
the adjacent landowners /business representatives regarding the concepts and added
Alternative 3 in response to several issues and concerns (see attached comments —
Exhibit 1).
Staff is recommending Alternative 3 due to the benefits and balance of access control,
intersection operations and safety as well as pedestrian, improvements. The
Transportation Commission should understand that staff is asking for general
consideration of the preliminary alternative — final, detailed design of the round -a- bouts,
pedestrian connections, bus lanes, etc. will be addressed with more detail upon general
concept approval as recommended.
G:\Engineering\lnfrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Transportation Commission \Agendas\2006_R&R \6 -15 -06 R &R \6- 15- 06_rr_11 -a.doc
C
Z•4.
WSB
&AUMdamA h=
Memorandum
WSB & Associates, Inc.
701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300
Minneapods, MN 55416
763- 541 -4800 763- 541 -1700 (fax)
To: Steven Lillehaug, Assistant City Engineer
From: Chuck Rickart, P.E., PTOE
Lynn Kiesow, P.E., PTOE
Date: June 12, 2006
Re: West 70th Street from France Avenue to York Avenue
WSB Project No. 1 06-00
Per your request, we have completed the design and operational analysis of West 70`s Street from
France Avenue to York Avenue. Three alternatives were analyzed with the proposed Target and
Westin Galleria developments, each with operations at LOS D and above in years 2009 and
2030. The first design modifies West 70th Street from a four -lane facility to a two -lane with turn
lanes. The second alternative includes two roundabouts located at the entrances /exits to
businesses along West 701h Street with a right - in/right -out at the central access to the Galleria.
The third alternative includes three roundabouts which adds an additional roundabout at the
central access to the Galleria.
Purpose of Analysis
The main purpose for the redesign of West 70th Street is to improve safety and insure satisfactory
traffic operations now and in the future. West 70`s Street is currently a four -lane undivided
facility with a recorded 9,750 annual average daily traffic volume in 2001. Crash information
from Mn/DOT showed 29 crashes within a three -year period or a crash rate of 7.2 crashes per
million vehicle miles (crashes /mvm). This figure is consistent with the metro average for a four -
lane undivided facility of 7.3 crashes /mvm. A three -lane facility channelizes vehicles, removing
turning vehicles from the thru lanes and reducing the number of overall crashes. As a three -lane
facility, the anticipated crash rate would be to the metro average of 6.0 crashes /mvm; a drop of
about 18 %. A vehicle /pedestrian crash also occurred near the entrance to the strip -mall on the
south side of West 70`h Street in 2004.
The redesign of West 70'' Street is also consistent with prior planning in the area. The Greater
Southdale Area Land Use and Transportation Study was completed in 2005. This study
describes a concept for long -term planning of the land use and transportation needs of the area.
The concept proposes the increase of pedestrian traffic along West 70`s Street, connecting the
retail uses to the north to the residential properties to the south. The concepts analyzed in this
memo enhance the pedestrian environment by reducing the number of lanes a pedestrian has to
K:\01686- 00\Admin\DocsVNan-060612 -70th Streetdoc
Steven Lillehaug - Memorandum
June 12, 2006
Page 2 of 12
cross. In addition, a median barrier provides a refuge, and allows the pedestrian to focus on one
lane of traffic at a time.
As a proactive way to maximize roadway capacity and improve safety, business accesses were
combined within the new alignments. By actively managing and controlling traffic through
access control, agencies can keep vehicular demand and roadway capacity in balance before
congestion forms. 'Near France Avenue, the accesses of the US Bank and Brandon Square Sites
were combined. Near York Avenue, the proposed Target has aligned its access with the Westin
Galleria to the north.
Exisdng Conditions
Traffic operations were evaluated at intersections along West 70`h Street: France Avenue, York
Avenue, and three business accesses. This section describes the methodology used to assess the
operations and provides a summary of how traffic is operating today.
Analysis Methodology
The traffic operations analysis is derived from established methodologies documented in the
Highway Capacity Manual (TRB, 2000). The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) provides a
series of analysis techniques that are used to evaluate traffic operation for intersections by using
roadway geometry, traffic control, and traffic volumes.
The HCM analysis typically provides results in the form of a letter grade from A to F, otherwise
called level of service (LOS). The letter is meant to give a qualitative estimate of the operational
efficiency or effectiveness. The system is set up similar to a report card with A representing
high - quality operations and F representing poor operations. At LOS A, motorists experience
very little delay or interference. On a roadway or intersection with LOS F conditions, motorists
would experience extreme delay or severe congestion.
For intersections, LOS is primarily a function of a.m. and p.m. peak -hour turning movement
volumes, intersection lane configuration, and traffic control. The intersection analysis was
completed using average control delay as defined by the HCM. The threshold values for
unsignalized intersections are slightly less than for signalized intersections. This variance was
created because motorists' expectations of the intersection differ with the type of traffic control.
The LOS for signalized and unsignalized intersections is shown on Table 1.
Although LOS A conditions represent the best possible level of traffic flow, the cost to construct
intersections to such high standards exceeds the benefit to the user. Therefore, for purposes of
this study, an overall goal was to obtain conditions at LOS D or better.
K:W1686-00Wdmin\Docs\Mem- 060612 -70th Stratdoc
Steven Lillehaug - Memorandum
June 12, 2006
Page 3 of 12
Table 1. Intersection Level of Service Delay
Level of
Service
Delay (sec /veh)
Signalized
Unsignalized
A
<10
<10
B
10-20
10 -15
C
20 -35
15 -25
D
35 -55
25 -35
E
55 -80
35 -50
F
80<
50<
Source: Highway Capacity Manual (2000)
The a.m., p.m., and weekend noon turning movement counts were reviewed to determine which
represented the worst case. The number of vehicles entering the intersections of France
Avenue /70th Street and York Avenue /70th Street were tabulated as shown below on Table 2. The
p.m. peak hour has about 1,500 more entering vehicles than the a.m. peak hour at each
intersection. It also carries about 900 more vehicles at France Avenue /70th Street and 600 more
vehicles at York Avenue /70'h Street than the weekend noon peak hour. For purposes of this
study, the p.m. peak hour was used to evaluate the worst condition.
Table 2. Year 2005 Entering Volumes at Intersections
Intersection
Vehicles Enterin
A.M. Peak
Hour
P.M. Peak
Hour
Weekend Noon
Peak Hour
West 70th Street / France Avenue
2,557
4,177
3,263
West 70'" Street/York Avenue
1,586
3,082
2,515
Source: Traffic Impact Study — Target Southdale Expansion (2005) and Traffic Impact Study — Westin Edina Galleria (2005)
No Build Level of Service Summary
Year 2009 conditions were used for the baseline analysis. The assumptions used in this analysis
were taken from the Traffic Impact Study for the Westin Edina Galleria including the following:
• The existing traffic counts were taken on a Thursday, October 20, 2005. The
p.m. peak hour on this date occurred between 4:45 p.m. and 5:45 p.m.
• The annual growth rate for background traffic was assumed at 1.5 %. This rate is
higher than the anticipated 1.0% annual growth rate, providing a conservative
operation analysis.
C
K: \01686- Wwmnin\nocs\Mcm- 060612a0th so-«Ldoc
' SIN
Steven Lillehaug - Memorandum
June 12, 2006
Page 4 of 12
The Westin Galleria expansion and the Super Target are anticipated to generate
an additional 253 trips during the p.m. peak hour. These additional trips were
included in the network.
The turning movements also assumed a 3/4 access at West 69`h Street and the
north Westin entrance /south Southdale entrance.
The lane geometry and turning movements for the 2009 no -build condition can be viewed on
Figure 1. Table 3, on the next page, summarizes the existing LOS at four intersections along
West 70th Street. West 70th Street/France Avenue is approaching congested conditions at LOS
D. However, the accesses to the businesses are operating at LOS A with minor delay to vehicles
exiting the sites.
Table 3. Year 2009 P.M. Peak Hour Intersection LOS
Source: WSB & Associates
To determine how the roadway segment will function in the future, year 2030 traffic volumes
were first estimated and compared to capacity measures. As indicated in the Greater Southdale
Area Traffic Operations Analysis Memorandum, traffic conditions at West 70th Street and France
Avenue are expected to operate at LOS F conditions in the future. To determine how West 70th
Street will function in the future, a "conservative" 1.5% annual growth rate was added to all
traffic volumes in the area, increasing the average daily volume on West 70th Street to 16,200 in
the year 2030. However, the historical growth rate of 1.0% is more likely in the future,
calculating to a daily volume of 12,600. It should be noted this analysis is a worst case and does
not include any reduction suggested by the concepts in the Greater Southdale Area Land Use
and Transportation Study.
Table 3, on the next page, summarizes the existing LOS at the three key intersections based on
the lane geometry and the 2030 traffic volumes illustrated in Figure 2. West 70th Street/France
Avenue and West 70th Street/York Avenue are failing at LOS E and F, respectively. Overall
K:\01686-00\Admin\Docs\Man-060612 -70th Snea.doc
Traffic
Intersection
Worst
95th Percentile
Intersection
Control
LOS / Delay
Movement LOS
Queue
(sec/veh)
/ Delay (sec /veh)
West 70th Street / France
Signal
D / 36.3
EBL - F / 96.9
EBL — 146'
Avenue
WBL — 208'
West 70`h Street /
Tom-
A / 3.9
SBL — C / 22.9
EBL — 136'
Galleria SW Entrance
Stop
EBL — 64'
West 70th Street /Galleria
Tom-
WBL-41'
SE/Target Entrance
Stop
A /3.9
NBL — B / 18.4
SBL — 56'
NBL — 76'
West 70th Street/York
EBL — 304'
Avenue
Signal
C / 28.2
WBL — E / 66.6
WBL — 194'
Source: WSB & Associates
To determine how the roadway segment will function in the future, year 2030 traffic volumes
were first estimated and compared to capacity measures. As indicated in the Greater Southdale
Area Traffic Operations Analysis Memorandum, traffic conditions at West 70th Street and France
Avenue are expected to operate at LOS F conditions in the future. To determine how West 70th
Street will function in the future, a "conservative" 1.5% annual growth rate was added to all
traffic volumes in the area, increasing the average daily volume on West 70th Street to 16,200 in
the year 2030. However, the historical growth rate of 1.0% is more likely in the future,
calculating to a daily volume of 12,600. It should be noted this analysis is a worst case and does
not include any reduction suggested by the concepts in the Greater Southdale Area Land Use
and Transportation Study.
Table 3, on the next page, summarizes the existing LOS at the three key intersections based on
the lane geometry and the 2030 traffic volumes illustrated in Figure 2. West 70th Street/France
Avenue and West 70th Street/York Avenue are failing at LOS E and F, respectively. Overall
K:\01686-00\Admin\Docs\Man-060612 -70th Snea.doc
Steven Lillehaug - Memorandum
June 12, 2006
Page 5 of 12
operations at the business accesses fall to LOS B to D. Vehicles exiting the businesses operate at
LOS F with long queues.
Table 4. Year 2030 P.M. Peak Hour Intersection LOS
Source: WSB & Associates
Alternative Analysis
Three alternatives were developed for the project area: a two -lane with turn lanes and two
roundabout alternatives. Each alternative is shown in the layouts. As noted previously, these
alternatives include the combination of business accesses on the corridor and assume an annual
growth rate of 1.5% to all traffic in the project area. The traffic operations analysis for the build
conditions were completed for years 2009 and 2030. Traffic volumes included projects for the
proposed Target and Westin Galleria developments.
Alternative A — Two -Lane with Turn Lanes
The lane geometry and turning movements for Alternative A are displayed on Figure 3. The
geometry of West 701h Street is a two -lane facility with turn lanes. Two eastbound traffic lanes
are provided at France Avenue to allow more vehicles through the intersection. One lane is
dropped with a 1:30 taper beginning 150' away from France Avenue.
K: \01686- 00\Admin\Do s\Mcm- 060612 -70th Streetdoe
Traffic
Intersection
Worst '
95th Percentile
Intersection
Control
LOS / Delay
Movement LOS
Queue
(sec /veh)
/ Delay (sec/veh)
West 70th Street / France
Signal
E / 56.5
NBL - F / 100+
EBL — 331'
Avenue
WBL — 288'
West 70th Street /
Business Access to
T
B/ 11.1
NBL — F / 80.0
WBL — 131'
South
Stop
West 701h Street /
Tom-
B / 10.4
SBL — F / 89.9
EBL — 296'
Galleria SW Entrance
Stop
West 70th Street /Galleria
Thru-
NBL _
EBL — 499'
WBL — 121'
D /53.7
NBR — F / 100+
SE/Target Entrance
Stop
SBL — F / 100+
SBL — 372'
NBL — 350'
West 70th Street/York
WBL — F / 100+
EBL — 510'
Avenue
Signal
F / 63.4
EBL — F / 100+
WBL — 366'
Source: WSB & Associates
Alternative Analysis
Three alternatives were developed for the project area: a two -lane with turn lanes and two
roundabout alternatives. Each alternative is shown in the layouts. As noted previously, these
alternatives include the combination of business accesses on the corridor and assume an annual
growth rate of 1.5% to all traffic in the project area. The traffic operations analysis for the build
conditions were completed for years 2009 and 2030. Traffic volumes included projects for the
proposed Target and Westin Galleria developments.
Alternative A — Two -Lane with Turn Lanes
The lane geometry and turning movements for Alternative A are displayed on Figure 3. The
geometry of West 701h Street is a two -lane facility with turn lanes. Two eastbound traffic lanes
are provided at France Avenue to allow more vehicles through the intersection. One lane is
dropped with a 1:30 taper beginning 150' away from France Avenue.
K: \01686- 00\Admin\Do s\Mcm- 060612 -70th Streetdoe
Steven Lillehaug - Memorandum
June 12, 2006
Page 6 of 12
Table 5 displays the intersection level -of- service and the delay at the worst movement at five (a
total of six) intersections on West 70`h Street. The average vehicle delay at each intersection
operates within the goal established in the methodology section. France Avenue/West 70th Street
and York Avenue/West 70th Street experience minor increases in delay. Accesses from the
businesses operate at LOS A/B, but the left -turn movement out of the commercial properties will
experience additional delay. The 95th percentile queue from the model was compared to the
proposed turn-bay lengths. The left -turn bays onto France Avenue, York Avenue and adjacent
businesses are adequate for the p.m. peak -hour traffic volumes.
Table 5. Year 2009 P.M. Peak Hour Intersection- LOS — Alternative A
Source: WSB & Associates
It is anticipated that Alternative A will be able to handle the projected traffic volumes discusses
in the previous section. The volumes are projected to be between 12,600 to 16,200 vehicles per
day. Louisiana Avenue in St. Louis Park is a perfect example of this type of operation. The
roadway was a four - lane facility with parking lanes between Cedar Lake Road and Minnetonka
Boulevard with average daily traffic volumes at 15,000. The facility had a large crash rate and
delays at intersections. The roadway was restriped as a two -lane roadway with a center left new
lane and parking on one side. The intersection delay and crash rate improved significantly.
K:\0 1686- 00Wdmin\Docs\Meni- o 12 -70th S=tdoc
. Worst
Traffic
Intersection
Movement
95"
Control
LOS / Delay
LOS / Delay
Percentile
Intersection
sec/veh
(s eh)
Queue
West 70' Street /
Signal
D / 39.6
EBL - E / 65.9
EBL — 246'
France Avenue
WBL — 240'
West 70th Street /
Business Access to
T
B / 13.3
NBL — F / 100+
WBL — 66'
South
Stop
West 70a' Street /
Thru-
SBL — D / 36.4
Galleria SW Entrance
Stop
A / 3.5
NBL — D / 36.5
EBL — 68'
West 70th Street
EBL — 72
/ Galleria SE/Target
A /7.8
NBL — E / 50.7
Sop
SBL — 81'
Entrance
NBL — 120'
West 70th Street/York
NBL — E / 62.1
EBL —182'
Avenue
Signal
C / 28.9
SBL — E / 59.4
WBL — 113'
Source: WSB & Associates
It is anticipated that Alternative A will be able to handle the projected traffic volumes discusses
in the previous section. The volumes are projected to be between 12,600 to 16,200 vehicles per
day. Louisiana Avenue in St. Louis Park is a perfect example of this type of operation. The
roadway was a four - lane facility with parking lanes between Cedar Lake Road and Minnetonka
Boulevard with average daily traffic volumes at 15,000. The facility had a large crash rate and
delays at intersections. The roadway was restriped as a two -lane roadway with a center left new
lane and parking on one side. The intersection delay and crash rate improved significantly.
K:\0 1686- 00Wdmin\Docs\Meni- o 12 -70th S=tdoc
Steven Lillehaug - Memorandum
June 12, 2006
Page 7 of 12
The geometry and projected traffic volumes for the 2030 condition are illustrated on Figure 4.
The model assumed a merge lane on West 70th Street between France Avenue and the Galleria
entrance as modeled in Year 2009 Alternative A. Additional left -turn lanes were added to the
northbound and southbound movements at West 70`h Street and France Avenue for the future
condition. A right turn was also added at to the northbound movement at West 70th Street and
York Avenue.
With this change, West 701h Street/France Avenue operates at LOS D as shown on Table 6. The
intersection of West 70th Street/York Avenue is approaching the LOS D/E boundary. Two of the
accesses to the businesses approach congestion also at LOS D due to long delays for motorist
exiting onto West 70th Street. With these delays, vehicles are likely to leave the sites using other
routes.
Table 6. Year 2030 P.M. Peak Hour Intersection LOS — Alternative A
Source: WSB & Associates
The intersection of West 70th Street/York Avenue is operating near the LOS D/E boundary. In
order to improve operations, the following additions were considered in the lane geometry:
Right -turn lane on westbound 70th Street - The overall intersection delay was reduced to
45.5 sec /veh with this addition and reduced the 95th percentile queue on the eastbound
left -turn lane from 269 feet to 187 feet.
K:w1e86mwmnin\oas\Mcm- 060612 -70th ShUtdoc
Worst
Traffic
Intersection
Movement
95th
Control
LOS / Delay
LOS / Delay
Percentile
Intersection
sec /veh
(s eh)
ueue
West 701h Street /
Signal
D / 46.3
WBL - E / 71.4
EBL — 246'
France Avenue
WBL — 240'
West 70th Street /
Business Access to
Sop
C / 28.9
NBL — F / 100+
WBL — 96'
South
West 70th Street /
Thru-
SBL — F / 100+
Galleria SW Entrance
Stop
A / 7.7
NBL — E / 47.1
EBL — 90'
West 70th Street
EBL — 92'
/ Galleria SE/Target
Thru
C / 33.1
SBL — F / 100+
WBL — 50'
Stop
NBL — F / 100+
SBL — 328'
Entrance
NBL — 324'
West 70th Street/York
Signal
D / 53.2
NBT — E / 74.7
EBL — 269'
Avenue
WBL —132'
Source: WSB & Associates
The intersection of West 70th Street/York Avenue is operating near the LOS D/E boundary. In
order to improve operations, the following additions were considered in the lane geometry:
Right -turn lane on westbound 70th Street - The overall intersection delay was reduced to
45.5 sec /veh with this addition and reduced the 95th percentile queue on the eastbound
left -turn lane from 269 feet to 187 feet.
K:w1e86mwmnin\oas\Mcm- 060612 -70th ShUtdoc
�A
ILE
Steven Lillehaug - Memorandum
June 12, 2006
Page 8 of 12
• Dual left-turn lanes on north and southbound York Avenue — The overall intersection
delay was reduced to 48.9 veh/sec.
While both solutions reduce the delay, the right -turn lane on 70'h Street is more economically
feasible. It should be noted that the addition of a southbound right -turn lane, a westbound right,
and an eastbound right -turn lane at the intersection of West 70`h Street/France Avenue as
recommended by the Greater Southdale Area Traffic Operations Analysis Memorandum was
also evaluated. These changes had little impact on the overall operations.
Alternative B — Two Roundabouts
Alternative B includes two roundabouts accessing the businesses between France Avenue and
York Avenue. The roundabout nearest to France Avenue combines the western access to the
Galleria and the two businesses to the south near France Avenue. The central access to the
Galleria is modified to a right - in/right -out. The other roundabout is at the eastern access to the
Galleria and the proposed Target. The roundabouts can be designed within the existing right -of-
way. The location of the roundabout and turning movements for year 2009 and 2030 are
displayed on Figures 5 and 6.
Table 7. Year 2009 P.M. Peak Hour Intersection LOS — Alternative B
Source: WSB & Associates
Notes: *Intersection is not comparable to other alternatives because the median is closed allowing only right- in/right -out movements.
K:\01686.00Wdmin\Docs\Mcm- 060612 -70th Sautdoc
Worst
Traffic
Intersection
Movement
95"
Control
LOS / Delay
LOS / Delay
Percentile
Intersection .
sec /veh
sec/veh
ueue
West 70'h Street /
Si al
D / 38.9
EBL - E / 65.9
EBL — 246'
France Avenue
WBL — 245'
EB — 125'
West 70th Street /
WB — 103'
Galleria / Business
Roundabout
A / 5.0
All A
SB -50'
Access to South
NB — 89'
West 70'h Street /
Right -In /
A/ 1.7
NA*
NA*
Galleria SW Entrance
Right -Out
West 70th Street
EB — 90
/ Galleria SE/Target
Roundabout
A / 5.6
All A
WB — 108'
SB -81'
Entrance
NB — 80'
West 70'h Street/York
NBL — E / 61.3
EBL — 203'
Avenue
Signal
C / 28.9
SBL — E / 55.8
WBL - 120'
Source: WSB & Associates
Notes: *Intersection is not comparable to other alternatives because the median is closed allowing only right- in/right -out movements.
K:\01686.00Wdmin\Docs\Mcm- 060612 -70th Sautdoc
c
Steven Lillehaug - Memorandum
June 12, 2006
Page 9 of 12
The intersection operations for Alternative B are displayed on Tables 7 and 8. While the
roundabouts have a minor reduction in delay in year 2009, the impacts of the roundabouts can be
seen more clearly in year 2030. The operations at the signalized intersections (France Avenue
and York Avenue) remain at the same level of operation. However, the intersections with
roundabouts improve from LOS C to LOS A. The largest improvement is seen for vehicles
exiting the businesses via West 70t1 Street. The delay improves from LOS F in the No Build and
Alternative A conditions to LOS A and B with the roundabouts.
Table 8. Year 2030 P.M. Peak Hour Intersection LOS — Alternative B
Source: WSB & Associates
Notes: *Intersection is not comparable to other alternatives because the median is closed allowing only right- in/right -out movements.
Alternative C — Three Roundabouts
Alternative C includes three roundabouts accessing the businesses between France Avenue and
York Avenue. The access to the Westin Galleria at the roundabout near France Avenue is
removed, creating a three -leg roundabout at this location. In addition, full access is provided at
the central intersection with a three -leg roundabout. Bus pullouts were included in all other
alternatives. Because of the short distance between roundabouts, the pullouts are not an option
with this alternative. The location of the roundabout and turning movements for year 2009 and
2030 are displayed on Figures 7 and 8.
K:\01686.00\Adnun\Docs\Mcm-060612 -70th StraLdoc
Worst
Traffic
Intersection
Movement
95th
Control
LOS / Delay
LOS / Delay
Percentile
Intersection
sec/veh
sec /veh
Queue
West 70' Street /
Signal
D / 52.6
NBL - E / 75.8
EBL — 327'
France Avenue
WBL — 270'
West 70t1 Street /
Business Access to
Roundabout
A / 6.3
NB — B / 15.7
WB — 156'
South
SB — 46'
NB — 165'
West 70th Street /
Right -In /
Galleria SW Entrance
Right -Out
A / 2.6
NA*
NA*
West 70th Street
EB — 121'
/ Galleria SE/Target
Roundabout
A / 7.4
All A
WB — 157'
Entrance
SB — 123'
NB — 126'
West 70' Street/York
EBL — 212'
Signal
D / 45.5
WBT — E /79.4
Avenue
WBL — 247'
Source: WSB & Associates
Notes: *Intersection is not comparable to other alternatives because the median is closed allowing only right- in/right -out movements.
Alternative C — Three Roundabouts
Alternative C includes three roundabouts accessing the businesses between France Avenue and
York Avenue. The access to the Westin Galleria at the roundabout near France Avenue is
removed, creating a three -leg roundabout at this location. In addition, full access is provided at
the central intersection with a three -leg roundabout. Bus pullouts were included in all other
alternatives. Because of the short distance between roundabouts, the pullouts are not an option
with this alternative. The location of the roundabout and turning movements for year 2009 and
2030 are displayed on Figures 7 and 8.
K:\01686.00\Adnun\Docs\Mcm-060612 -70th StraLdoc
Steven Lillehaug - Memorandum
June 12, 2006
Page 10 of 12
The intersection operations for Alternative C are displayed on Tables 9 and 10. Operations for
this alternative are very similar to Alternative B.
Table 9. Year 2009 P.M. Peak Hour Intersection 1.09 — Alternative C
source: wbis & Associates
Future Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
The previous analysis determined that left - turning vehicles exiting the Galleria and Target are
anticipated to experience excessive delay and queuing in future years. An evaluation was
completed at the intersection of West 70'h Street and the Galleria/Target to determine if and
when a traffic signal would meet one of eight warrants as defined in the Mn MUTCD. The three
following warrants apply to this location but are not meet:
Warrant 1— Eight -Hour Vehicular Volume,
• Warrant 2 — Four -Hour Vehicular Volume, and
• Warrant 3 — Peak Hour.
K:\01686- 00Wdmin\DocsWcm- 060612 -70th StrceLdoc
Worst
Traffic
Intersection
Movement
95`h
Control
LOS / Delay
LOS / Delay
Percentile
Intersection
sec /veh
sec /veh
Queue
West 7e Street /
Signal
D / 39.0
EBL - E / 65.8
EBL — 249'
France Avenue
WBL — 240'
West 70th Street /
EB — 131'
Galleria / Business
Roundabout
A / 4.8
All A
WB — 73'
Access to South
NB — 86'
West 70th Street /
Galleria SW Entrance
Roundabout
A / 6.1
All A
WB — 84'
SB — 50'
West 70th Street
EB — 8
/Galleria SE/Target
Roundabout
A / 5.3
All A
WB — 116'
Entrance
SB — 71'
NB -71'
West 70th Street/York
NBL — E / 59.1
EBL —112'
Signal
C / 28.0
Avenue
SBL — E / 59.6
WBL — 112'
source: wbis & Associates
Future Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis
The previous analysis determined that left - turning vehicles exiting the Galleria and Target are
anticipated to experience excessive delay and queuing in future years. An evaluation was
completed at the intersection of West 70'h Street and the Galleria/Target to determine if and
when a traffic signal would meet one of eight warrants as defined in the Mn MUTCD. The three
following warrants apply to this location but are not meet:
Warrant 1— Eight -Hour Vehicular Volume,
• Warrant 2 — Four -Hour Vehicular Volume, and
• Warrant 3 — Peak Hour.
K:\01686- 00Wdmin\DocsWcm- 060612 -70th StrceLdoc
C_
Steven Lillehaug - Memorandum
June 12, 2006
Page 11 of 12
Table 10. Year 2030 P.M. Peak Hour Intersection LOS — Alternative C
Source: WSB & Associates
The volume on the minor roadways is an important factor in all three of these warrants.
Specifically in this location, the left -turn movements leaving the sites will be the main controller.
To meet warrants, the largest left -turn movement needs to be 100 during the peak hour. At full
build, 46 left- turning vehicles are anticipated to exit the Galleria site and 81 left-turning vehicles
are anticipated to leave the Target site during the p.m. peak hour. These traffic projections were
taken from the Westin Edina Galleria Trafflc Impact Study and the Target Southdale Expansion
Traffic Impact Study. Since the minor street volumes are not anticipated to meet these
minimums, the intersection will not meet warrants no matter how high the volumes get on West
70t}' Street.
However, the traffic projections entering and exiting the Galleria site were generated using
numbers from the ITE Trip Generation Manual while volumes for Target used historic data from
the Target Corporation. These numbers assume an averaged value. Therefore, when the sites are
in operation, it is possible that the volumes will be higher than the estimates. Traffic should be
monitored over time to determine if the sites produce enough traffic to meet warrants.
K:\01686-W\Adniin\Docs\Mcn-060612-70th Sn=Ldoc
Worst
Traffic
Intersection
Movement
95th
Control
LOS / Delay
LOS / Delay
Percentile
Intersection
sec/veh
sec/veh
ueue
West 70'h Street /
Signal
D / 54.2
NBT - E / 61.9
EBL — 320'
France Avenue
WBL — 256'
West 70'h Street /
EB — 96'
Business Access to
Roundabout
A / 5.5
NB—B/ 11.5
WB — 94'
South
NB — 75'
West 7& Street /
E13-71'
Roundabout
A / 7.3
All A
WB —126'
Galleria SW Entrance
SB — 63'
EB — 195'
West 7& Street
WB —155'
/ Galleria SE/Target
Roundabout
A / 7.3
All A
SB —100'
Entrance
NB — 134'
West 70'h Street/York
EBL — 195'
Signal
D / 42.0
NBT — E / 64.0
Avenue
WBL — 114'
Source: WSB & Associates
The volume on the minor roadways is an important factor in all three of these warrants.
Specifically in this location, the left -turn movements leaving the sites will be the main controller.
To meet warrants, the largest left -turn movement needs to be 100 during the peak hour. At full
build, 46 left- turning vehicles are anticipated to exit the Galleria site and 81 left-turning vehicles
are anticipated to leave the Target site during the p.m. peak hour. These traffic projections were
taken from the Westin Edina Galleria Trafflc Impact Study and the Target Southdale Expansion
Traffic Impact Study. Since the minor street volumes are not anticipated to meet these
minimums, the intersection will not meet warrants no matter how high the volumes get on West
70t}' Street.
However, the traffic projections entering and exiting the Galleria site were generated using
numbers from the ITE Trip Generation Manual while volumes for Target used historic data from
the Target Corporation. These numbers assume an averaged value. Therefore, when the sites are
in operation, it is possible that the volumes will be higher than the estimates. Traffic should be
monitored over time to determine if the sites produce enough traffic to meet warrants.
K:\01686-W\Adniin\Docs\Mcn-060612-70th Sn=Ldoc
Steven Lillehaug - Memorandum
June 12, 2006
Page 12 of 12
Key Conclusions
Based upon this analysis, West 70th Street will operate as a two -lane with turn lanes or
roundabouts adequately in the existing and future conditions. Additional results are as follows:
• As a two -lane facility with turn lanes, West 70th Street is anticipated to have a
reduction in vehicular crashes and improve pedestrian safety.
• The reduction of lanes on West 70th Street enhances the pedestrian environment,
consistent with the concepts in the Greater Southdale Area Land Use and
Transportation Study.
• Business accesses were combined to improve capacity and safety along the
corridor in all alternatives.
• Near France Avenue, two thru lanes are provided for vehicles eastbound 70th
Street. The lanes begin to merge about 100' from the intersection. This allows
the intersection to operate efficiently while fitting into the existing right -of -way.
• Signal operations at West 70th Street and York Avenue were adequate for all
conditions without the providing two thru lanes on West 70th Street between York
Avenue and the Galleria/Target entrance. This allows width to provide an
additional eastbound left -turn lane, improving overall operations.
• In Alternative A, the left -turn bays into the commercial developments were
designed to accommodate the 95th percentile queue demand during the p.m. peak
hour.
• In order to improve si�rtal operations, improvements will be required at the
intersections West 70 Street/France Avenue and West 70th Street/York Avenue
by year 2030. For purposes of this study, left -turn lanes were added on the
northbound and southbound lanes of France Avenue and a right turn was added at
to the northbound movement at York Avenue in all the 2030 alternatives.
• In Alternative A, left- turning vehicles exiting the Galleria and Target will
experience delay as volumes increase on West 70th Street. This location is not
anticipated to meet signal warrants in the future, but the location should be
monitored in case traffic from the site is higher than projected. By consolidating
accesses at roundabouts, the operations at the business accesses were improved to
LOS A.
Please contact Chuck Rickart or Lynn Kiesow with any additional questions at (763) 541 -4100.
K: W1686- OOWdmin\Docs\Mem•060612.70th Streadoc
b
0
N
d
c
a`
v
0
e
aJPm �
f 9
t itl5 N O r r
7
`" h r► •
Legend
zxx I PM Peak Hour Volumss,
hT�► Proposed Lane ConfOpOon V1,
WEST 70TH STREET FROM FRANCE AVE TO YORK AVE
CITY OF EDINA
»4
0
°
J
Prepared by.
- 701 Xr AW M S0.h Sub 900
w
Mnmipck MN 66116
E
WSB Mwr.rtlwamm
-
7
— M511V�.i�76aHim
n
uME - BMES" - RNIIMC � COIBfRICT M
� L
»4
Year 2009
No Build
Turning Movement and Lane Geometry
ure 1
164-4,
"
Year 2009
No Build
Turning Movement and Lane Geometry
ure 1
0
0
At
/0-
A
40J
iF NORTH
k,
V10%
*1k
276 4 q
35 131 32
q
,
I
WEST 70TH STREET FROM FRANCE AVE TO YORK AVE
CITY OF EDINA
Prepared by
A 70, xor" Avww so-, suva 300
Monespois, MN 5608
WSB ~..Gbwv wM
!Td� 4
7"WI9 F.7"t=
REPMATRUCAME - ENWIMM - PLANNM - cowrwcnoN
250
Year 2030
No Build
Turning Movement and Lane Geometry
Figure 2
0
09
�
NW
N O
�O Y
vE
a`
vm
03
i i err c r« r
Air
ltv,
•* '%. ! _. � F.!" . " . 410 �D '0 ^n
{ k 209 . .. . 2S +� o F
Ems• 309 i _' 3 5 7
r,
? oe -1•�
49
F1�(�
t
106 �►
�� �. 706
f1 �'
—�
fir..
'
102
h� 0272s
�
233 ��
h.
Mo �
cvNQ
mQm
� 0
�
Mom
164
' Legend
IL
it
`.i
xztr PM Peak Hour Volunwq&
io
X11 �► Proposed Lane
Con
�M�. tk
r "r ♦
fi
WEST 70TH STREET FROM FRANCE AVE TO YORK AVE
CITY OF EDINA
Year 2009
Alternative A
Prepared by.
,0— ���
�.s,s,Me � Turning Movement and Lane Geometry
WSB W"'"°°`' MN 56416
wrwrtlr�mn
lire 3
IM , *0 ,, CONInNKTM
� per
�44
. � t• N
r` r-
O iO3
' 03 4,
276
'r-,236
`1t&
ID NN
MQN
PM Peak Hour Volurrm
Proposed Lane Confqursbon
Ar
,
Otj s,� NOR_ TH
....
t
O
41-
t . _.
32
4.
41 0
55* 9 T:� � 4 925 6 s>
957
'A 63, —
W }
x 250 j
�
�
1
�..
� 4
Nom 222 -:4,
am
mQM
OQ N
r
°
a�
y
t w
µ
1�IM1� 1
• �y
T
K,
WEST 70TH STREET FROM FRANCE AVE TO YORK AVE
CITY OF EDINA
Prepared by.
- 701 %w" Amur South, Sub 900
WSB `.'&o*m
AA—IA "
— 1"AD- F.AW1700
AMURUMAM ,,x
Year 2030
Alternative A
Turning Movement and Lane Geometry
Figure 4
0
oom
no
15 E
20
V
23:
mfl,",
AV t
7 7 -'.t
08 --Jo.
49
C
NORTH.
c
iF 1. OOP
I 209 -t-
�A
309 6'r,
is
A
0
P�
25 Z. 103 23
A
601 '*—,�457
M2 r-* 73
t T 59
724 6-* 505
9e
106 02
lb
Legend L. 1.4;- 4! 4
xxx I PM Peak Hour Vokwim
for
411 Proposed Lam CorrOgurnon,
WEST 70TH STREET FROM FRANCE AVE TO YORK AVE
CITY OF EDINA
Prepared by.
A 701 Xw�s AwwW Spill, SUft 300
MN 55418
WSB
K= - Ommum
11
evoot�
272,..:1
room
00
233
164
4j
Year 2009
Alternative B
Turning Movement and Lane Geometry
ire 5
0
0
N
N
b
d
a`
Kj
TOP i 4: t o :� s4 M _ �C
f
xt
a
xj p t+ 35 13 t 32
WEST 70TH STREET FROM FRANCE AVE TO YORK AVE
CITY OF EDINA
Prepared by.
- 701 Xww Avow SOLO, Suit 900
WSB "i�.°°"."
toawmrairN+. +gym
BUuamucnwE - E ODEStM , PWW" - COMPRI MON
14t
37 NOW
x �
43,,.s
250 -"�
Year 2030
Alternative B
Turning Movement and Lane Geometry
Figure 6
0
0
f I
.:t
V,
c
t (+
NNv
aovm
NO
106 y L 'I ra
KHI
WEST 70TH STREET FROM FRANCE AVE TO YORK AVE
CITY OF EDINA
0
o Prepared by
70-1x" A%wm SoLik Sure 300
WSa Mhwepak UN %416
PL~ - COWTRUMN
25
103
61 eo. 1-t�
02
57
73
272.,;"
72
t
23
t+
164
AU
Year 2009
Alternative C
Turning Movement and Lane Geometry
ure
0
a
N
a
v
'N;4
Cam`
vr-
i w
S
AiL
35
dL
t tat 32
$q42
C89 ...►
03
ro
+�
t {�
—410. `1� J� 250
x �
mNa co .-a. ... C4,00 ?. 222 Oct�v
> K)IRN — ,p.. r
n
N
A N
r
tx
L.ogend
r
PM Peak Hour Volumes * t�
Proposed Lana Configuration F .
�
ja a q�
4 ab ,.
X44 VL�
0
WEST 70TH STREET FROM FRANCE AVE TO YORK AVE Year 2030
CITY OF EDINA
Alternative C
0
$ Prepared by
�Q .— ,�A,�� SUVA
Turning Movement and
Lane Geometry
MwDw�p.mm
E W%9
16M5�- h16a}11a
o IFAAURUMM EMWEEW-KAN"-C NFRWnffi
Figure 8
AR. q.
=.a.
I it .
AW C.
I'. Q. evkd'WN i
From: Steve Lillehaug
vl • S • �3 AN K CoM«ert s
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 3:10 PM
To: 'CAROL.ROYALTY @usbank.com'
Cc: Steve Lillehaug
Subject: RE: 70th Street (France to York) Roadway Corridor Concept
Carol,
Thank you for your comments. We plan to take a closer look at this access point
to better address your concerns. Thanks. -STEVE
Steven L. Lillehaug, PE, PTOE
Assistant City Engineer /Traffic Engineer
952 - 826 -0445
slillehaug @ci.edina.mn.us
City of Edina
Engineering Department
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
www.cityofedina.com
(fax) 952 - 826 -0389
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: CAROL.ROYALTY @usbank.com [ mailto :CAROL.ROYALTY @usbank.com]
Sent: Wednesday., May 24, 2006 2:00 PM
To: Steve Lillehaug
Subject: RE 70th Street (France to York) Roadway Corridor Concept
Steve, in looking at the drawing again today, it appears to me that it will be
difficult for people on the service road between the bank and the mall next door
to access 70th from the bank side of the curb. If the curb could be pulled back
from the intersection so that cars won't have such an angle to get to the drive
opening it would make it an easier exit.
Carol Royalty
Property Manager
US Bank Corporate Real Estate
EP -MN -0117
4000 W Broadway
Robbinsdale, MN 55422
Phone: 763 - 536 -5399
Fax: 763 - 536 -5389
DP: 612 - 650 -6073
carol.royalty @usbank.com
"Steve Lillehaug"
<slillehaug @ci.ed
ina.mn.us> To
05/23/2006 04:12 cc
PM
�.�• Ex, L Page Iof,
From: Alan Menning [al @tyconco.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2006 1:46 PM
To: Steve Lillehaug • UMOW SQUAK1M1A� Subject: West 70th Street �01�1 S
Thoughts on this momings meeting
e size (24 feet) of entrance for Us Bank and Brandon Sq who will be sharing an entrance and exit with only 24 feet. Ca, _
,,mg off 70th from the circle and cars tryingAo enter the circle from US Bank side, it will be a big hazard area, because cars going
into the circle from the US Bank side will not be able to see if the traffic in the circle will be turning into the site or going straight on
70th it's going to be a big °X" type of crossing. Also, in the same 24 foot you will have cars crossing between Brandon and US Bank
and vise versa.
2. Either coming off the circle or going onto the circle it will require a hard left or right causing the possibilities of more rear end
collisions or slowing of the traffic within the circle. At times now there are cars backed up trying to make rights onto 701h from both
US Bank and Brandon at the same time. I think it will cause a blocking of exiting from the circle into the sites. In thinking about it,
there is no set flow for the traffic in Brandon's and US Bank's situation, traffic coming into the sites either wants to go left or right ther
add in the cars who want to get out of the sites doing the lefts and rights, plus you have the crossing between the sites —no control or
direction. Circles seem to work if the flow is directed in one direction, exiting to the left entering from the right and the two are
separated by a non - crossable median. That's not the case as proposed for Brandon and US Bank.
3. We will need signage coming off the circle Us Bank >>> and <<< Brandon Square
4. US Bank customers using our parking lot
5. Circles are only one lane most I have seen are two
Alan Manning
612 - 379 -7000 X101
al@tyconco.com
C
fit... exA;6:} j
111-AK Engineering • Planning • Surveying • Landscape Architecture
KUUSISTO LTD
*�: 1969
MEMORANDUM
TO: Wayne Houle, City Engineer, City of Edina
COPY: Steven Lillehaug, Traffic Engineer, City of Edina
Gordon Hughes, City Manager, City of Edina
Forrest Russell, Target Corporation
Alice Roberts - Davis, Target Corporation
Eames Gilmore, Target Corporation
Brian Teeters, Ryan Companies
Chris Carda, RLK Incorporated
Nick Erpelding, RLK Incorporated
FROM: John Dietrich, ASLA
DATE: May 26, 2006
Email: - whoule @ci. edina ma us
Email: slillehaug@ci.edina.mn.us
Email. - ghughes@ci.edina.mmus
Email. forrest.russell@target.com
Email. alice.roberu- davis&arget.com
Email. eames.gilmore@target.com
Email. brimteeters@ryancompanies.com
Email. ccarda@rlkinc.com
Email. nerpelding@rlkinc.com
Email. - jdietrich@rlkinc.com
RE: Target (T47) Southdale - Edina, MN
Follow -up to May 24, 2006 Preliminary Civil Plan Submittal
RLK Incorporated Project No. 2004 -789 -M
This memorandum is a follow -up to the set of preliminary civil plans, which were sent to your office on
Wednesday, May 24th.
The plans dated March 24, 2006 represent the civil design to carry out the plan which was approved at the
May 2, 2005 City Council. The plans are RLK's 80-85 percent set of civil documents to establish the
baseline cost for the Target site/civil improvements. RLK is working with Ryan Companies to have a
solid bid for the construction of the site elements, as shown on the May 24d' plans, by Friday, June 21
.
As RLK and Ryan are preparing the plan cost estimate, we anticipate there will be adjustments to the
plan, specifically along the promenade where URS is developing the design resolution. For our June 2,
2006, cost estimation purposes, we are focusing on the utilities and the cost to implement the plan as
shown along the rear (50 feet) of the Target store. We further understand the design of the promenade
may impact the north side (West 7016 Street) design of the landscape. and walkway connection. In
addition, as the West 7& Street design resolution evolves, the plan for SuperTarget will have to be
adjusted to accommodate the design, be it a roundabout or a standard street design as shown.
RLK is asking for the City's assistance in order to have'a best estimate of the following by June 21d.
Hopefully, the following will be discussed at our meeting on June la at 2:00 p.m.
Offices: Hibbing • Minnetonka • Ham Lake • Twin Ports
�- (952) 933 -0972 - 6110 Blue Circle Drive - Suite 100 • Minnetonka, MN 55343 • FAX (952) 933 -1153
Equal Opportunity Employer
Target (T-47) Southdale - Edimk AN May 26, 2006
Follow -up to May 24, 2006 Preliminary Civil Plan Submittal Page 2 of 2
A. West 70`h Street Design
1. Preferred design,
2. West 70th cost projection York to France Avenue,
3. West 70th cost estimate to be allocated to Target,
4. Construction timeline for West 70'h1
5. Construction breakdown (public or private contractor).
B. Engineering/Building Review of Plan
L Comments on the May 24'h plans:
a. Engineering, planning and traffic
2. Fee estimate for:
a. - Stormwater for off -site ponding,
b. Trunk charges for utility access,
3. City permits and fees for:
a. Demolition,
b. Sitelerosion control
c. Building permit review and fee structure
d. Other
4. Are separate grading, demolition, footing and foundation permits available?
5. Review time for civil plans for construction if separate from building documents,
6. Review time for building permit.
C. General Timeline for Target Project
October 15, 2006
January 5, 2007
January 5 -19, 2007
January 22, 2007
January 29 — October, 2007
August 1, 2007
October 5, 2007
D. Other Items to Discuss
Secure site and building permit
Close store
Abate the building - remove all stock
Demolition begins
Reconstruction site and building
Oil site improvements complete
Reopen store
The above items are intended to be discussion items to allow'RLK and Target to have a basis for the cost
estimate, preferred plan of West 70'h Street and an understanding of the fees the City of Edina will be
requesting as a part of this project.
Thank you for your attention to this item. We look forward to the meeting on Thursday, June 1°t at
2:00 p.m.
0 :1Ta Md Corpotoon12004- 789 -1M Comspondc=NCity Sub 05-24-06 Preliminary Civil PlanslMeo City- Followup to 05 -74-06 prelim civil
plans.doc
From: Nicholas Erpelding [nerpelding @rlk- kuusisto.com]
Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 9:13 AM
To: Steve Lillehaug
Cc: Wayne Houle; wbeck @gabbertbeck.com; Vernon Swing;
crickart@wsbeng.com
Subject: 70th Street Concept Comment
Attachments: W70thSt- RAB.pdf
Steve --
I, a , E064bif i
40.1iffre,/wIrsko, p&i
cafto"fs
As discussed in your meeting on 5/23, the Galleria can't support the western
roundabout access because of internal site circulation issues.
Specifically, both covered parking areas are not adjacent to this access, thus
forcing immediate turning conflicts upon entry to the site and increasing the
risk of backing accidents for patrons.
The Galleria is strongly in favor of the roundabout access solution idea. We
support the eastern roundabout and have attached a sketch showing an additional
central roundabout. We realize that future access will allowable at the western
roundabout if the central one is provided; and also realize that the bus
pullouts may be awkward with articulated busses. On the other.hand, providing
the central roundabout will facilitate pedestrian access to the promenade
without the need for an overpass. Also, the central roundabout concept
maintains flexibility for the promenade in the event that in the future
vehicular traffic is allowed.
The Galleria also supports the conversion of the existing 69th Street accesses
to roundabouts as this area redevelops.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment. We would welcome the opportunity to
provide positive input at the Transportation Commission if you need it.
Nick and Vern
------------------------------------------------------
Nicholas J. Erpelding, PE
Professional Traffic Engineer
RLK Incorporated rlkinc.com
952.933.0972
------------------------------------------------ - - - - --
All RLK Incorporated staff should be aware that all e-mail messages and
attachments are being scanned for viruses and content.
MINUTES OF THE
Edina Transportation Commission
Thursday, June 15, 2006
Edina City Hall
4801 West 50th Street
Community Room
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Les Wanninger, Warren Plante, Marie Thorpe, Jean White, Geof Workinger, Dean
Dovolis
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Joni Kelly Bennett, Marc Usem
STAFF PRESENT:
Steve Lillehaug, Sharon Allison
1. Call to order
The meeting was called to order by Plante.
II. New Business
a. West 70th Street (France Avenue to York Avenue) Traffic Study
Lillehaug said the City initiated a traffic study at this location to analyze potential geometrics
improvements, operational and access issues, and safety improvements in response to the
recent West 70th Street area re- development applications received by the City.
Three concept layouts (A, B and C) were developed by Chuck Rickart, Project Manager and
Lynn Kiesow, Project Engineer, of WSB & Associates, Inc. Lillehaug said alternate C was
developed after receiving feedback from the land and business owners. To date, no negative
feedback or objections have been received regarding alternate C. Staff is recommending
approval of alternate C. The current layout is preliminary; a more detailed design will be done
later.
Plante asked what impact the plan for West 70th Street is going to have on the modeling that
is planned for Southdale and the surrounding areas. Lillehaug said the modeling accounts for
this plan and the modeling will grow on what was used by WSB and other traffic consultants.
Rickart explained that there have been 29 crashes in the area over the last three years. He
said four lane roadways without turn lanes tend to have more accidents. When a third lane is
added for turning, crashes are reduced and a roundabout will decrease crashes even more
because the left turn lanes are eliminated. He said the level of service on this type of road is
based on delay — how long a driver sits at an intersection waiting to turn. Existing conditions
shows the peak hour of 4:30 p.m. to be the worst and some access issue getting out of Target.
Plante asked where the accidents occurred, considering that there are few entry/exits. Kiesow
explained that most were rear -ended accidents which are common on roads without turn
lanes. Workinger asked if they could get a layout of exactly where the accidents occurred to
help them determine if a roundabout is actually safer than a four -lane roadway and also how
many pedestrian accidents have occurred. Kiesow said there was one pedestrian accident.
The accident locations could be provided at a later date.
Alternate A includes left turn lanes at Target and the Galleria; bus pull out lane, sidewalks for
pedestrians, and raised medians with landscaping; Alternate B includes a roundabout at
Target and the Galleria entrance point and a second one at the west Galleria /Branden Square
access point. The Galleria business representative did not like the second roundabout
because vehicles backing out of parking spaces would block cars coming in from 70th.
Alternate C has three roundabouts with no access into the Galleria on the west end. Rickart
said roundabouts typically slow traffic, unlike stop signs where drivers tend to speed up when
moving off, and they are also pedestrian friendly because pedestrians only cross one lane at a
time. He said an overpass was considered for alternate A but studies show that pedestrians
tend not use overpasses.
Some negative aspects of having three roundabouts are: not adequate room for bus pull outs;
getting from France to York Avenue will be a little slower; and snowplowing will be slower and
drivers will have to be trained on plowing around the roundabout. Semi - trucks will be able to
navigate the roundabouts adequately.
Lillehaug was asked what he liked about alternate C. He said they are eliminating a three -
quarter intersection which is not usually the safest; the design works well with planned
redevelopment; and it provides an opportunity for a crosswalk mid - block.
Workinger said the roundabout slows traffic down, creates a safer environment and better
access from north to south off of W. 70th. 'He does not believe it will help pedestrians, althougr
the slower traffic should make it safer to cross W. 70th.
To sum up the benefits that will be realized, Wanninger said it will be safer for pedestrians,
greatly improved access from the businesses, slower moving traffic, and improved aesthetics.
Dovolis said the green space in alternate C helps to soften the area and Thorpe said the
sidewalks connect both sides together. The commissioners asked if there are roundabouts in
the twin cities that they could look at. Lillehaug is going to put together a list of locations to
send out via email.
Thorpe motioned to accept staffs recommendation because alternate C will make it
safer for pedestrians, greatly improved _ access from the businesses, slower moving
traffic and improved aesthetic. Seconded by White.
Plante asked if any consideration has been given for a roundabout at York. Lillehaug said no;
it would be more significant because it would involve the county and has right of way
implications.
Ayes: 6 ( Wanninger, Plante, Workinger, Thorpe, White, Dovolis)
Nayes: 0
Absent: 2 (Bennett, Usem)
Motion carried.
2
Wanninger congratulated Lillehaug for a job well done in introducing a new and different
concept and explaining it in a way that they could understand.
Lillehaug said the next step is to work out agreements with the county regarding turn lanes,
prepare feasibility for the ETC and Council and get Mn /DOT's approval. He said a timeline has
not been established yet, but they need to be mindful that the Westin Galleria and Target are
modifying their plans to accommodate this project and they are planning on opening in
approximately 2008 -2009.
III. Handouts
a. Upcoming Transportation Commissioner Calendar
June 19 — Final SAC meeting to review the draft report and make recommendations to the
ETC. This meeting is no longer the "Final" SAC meeting since Minneapolis will not hold their
open house until June 27 relative to the NE traffic study.
Wanninger suggested the following issues for discussion at the June 19 meeting:
• Parking — he said they need to come to an agreement regarding parking so that it can be
included in the report.
• There are two categories of things to be done: 1) normal infrastructure replacement and
Houle and Lillehaug can explain what these are and they will continue to handle these; and
2) traffic calming measures. He said #2 will most likely be controversial and should be
separated from #1.
• Assuming there is a recommendation to move forward, the process in the policy was
designed to deal with an issue on a particular street. He suggested formulating a process
that would have a more comprehensive approach.
Plante asked if the Council will be allowed to push this off. Wanninger said they will have to
point out to them that the issues have been around for a decade and that traffic consultants
were hired to gather data and, while the solutions are not perfect, it is the best that can be
done and they need to act on the ETC's recommendations.
June 27 — City of Minneapolis' Open House sponsored by Councilmember Hodges.
June 29 — Final SAC meeting, followed by a special ETC meeting.
July 5 — Study presentation to Council.
July — More to come on the West 70th Street Traffic Study; the consultant will be identified and
project scope presented to the ETC.
Plante said he is concerned about the lack of a long term vision that identifies what type of
street West 70th is — residential, commercial, freeway, etc. Dovolis said there are two
approaches and they are both policy questions that need answering. He said one approach is
to preserve it as a residential street and the other is to make it a commercial connector. Plante
suggested that the consultant be given a framework in which to work. Wanninger said
consultants work best when they know the policy that they're working with.
IV. Approval of Minutes
a. May 15, 2006
The following corrections were made to the minutes:
3
p. 3, top line: 'keep faith,' not face; paragraph 2, delete "He suggested probably a website
where they can list what they are working on" and replace it with He indicated that the city's
website list projects being working on.
p. 3, bottom line: "...more aesthetically pleasing and superior function."
p. 4, paragraph 3, second -to -last and last full lines: change "somewhat" to potentially and "fix
the problem" to widen the roadway.
p. 5, Speed Limit Policy Motion: to clarify the motion made and voted upon, "Bennett moved
that the ETC recommend that the City Council adopt changes to the City speed limit policy to
permit reduction of speeds on residential street segments from 30 to 25 mph, on a case -by-
case basis, in accordance with Minnesota law."
p. 6, paragraph 3, under Open Discussion: change "taking out" to tearing down and insert "a
number of homes and businesses."
Plante motioned to approve the minutes with the corrections. Seconded by Dovolis.
White and Thorpe abstained.
V. Planning Commission Update (Commissioner Workinger)
Reviewed and accepted a report from the Housing Task Force. There were no land use
issues on the agenda.
VI. Open Discussion
Regarding bicycles on sidewalks, Lillehaug said MN statute allows bicycles on sidewalks,
however, cities can restrict them in commercial areas but Edina has no restrictions.
White said she attended the Southwest Transit Way PAC meeting and they are getting ready
to start their "Vote Yes" campaign to get the state to dedicate all of the vehicles' sales tax to
road and transit improvements. She said a southwest alternative route is being planned for
September.
VII. Adjournment
Meeting adjourned. A special meeting is scheduled for June 29, 6:00 -8:00 p.m. in the
Community Room, City Hall. The next regular meeting is scheduled for July 20, 6:00 -8:00 p.m.
in the Community Room, City Hall.
4
Page 1 of 1
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 7:29 AM
To: Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Joni Bennett; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com
Cc: Darlene Wallin
Subject: FW: Transportation Board RE: 70th Street in Edina
Jennifer Bennerotte
Communications & Marketing Director
City of Edina
952 - 833 -9520
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
jbennerotte@ci.edina.mn.us
From: Beth Rogers [mailto:noticehappythings @msn.com]
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 7:48 PM
To: sen.geoff.michel @senate.mn; rep. ron.erhardt @ house.mn; rep.neil.peterson @house.mn;
jhovland @krauserollins.com; pbennett @mn.rr.com; Jennifer Bennerotte; mandre @mnwire.com;
dangiedd @hotmail.com; Loub0005 @umn.edu; josh @joshsprague.com; scot.housh @willis.com
Subject: Transportation Board RE: 70th Street in Edina
Dear City of Edina Officials and Government Planners:
I am not an Edina resident, but work in Edina and travel on 70th St. frequently to my work at NC
Little Hospice which is located at 71st and Lynmar.
As a non - resident who works and shops in Edina, I thought you. might like to know that I fully
support the neighborhood's efforts to reduce noise and traffic on their street. I agree with the
neighborhood association's potential solutions. I hope you will consider their voice as the
determining factor in decisions regarding the future of 70th Street. Make their street more quiet
and beautiful, and route traffic more to the convenient freeways to the north and south.
Sincerely,
S. Beth Rogers
6611 31st Ave N.
Crystal, MN 55427
2/13/2007
o� /Le
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Cary Teague
City Planner
Date: February 20, 2007
Subject:
REPORT /RECOM MEN DATION
Conditional Use Permit for
The City of Edina /Edina Fire
Department, 6250 Tracy
Avenue, Edina, MN
Recommendation:
Approve the conditional use permit.
Information /Background:
Agenda Item: III. A.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
Action: ❑
❑
To H RA
To Council
Motion
Resolution
Ordinance
Discussion
The City of Edina is proposing to tear down the majority of the existing fire station and
rebuild a new one. (See plans on pages A4 —A9.) The request requires a conditional use
permit with the following variances:
• A front yard setback variance from 50 feet to 17.9 feet for the front building
entrance.
A side street setback variance from 50 feet to 23.5 feet for the new building.
• A driveway distance from an intersection setback variance from 50 feet to 26 feet
for the front entrance.
A maximum drive width variance from 30 feet to 124 feet for the front entrance.
The variances were considered and approved by the Zoning Board of Appeals at their
February 15, 2007 meeting. (See minutes on pages A14 —A15.)
Primary Issue
Is the proposed new fire station reasonable for this site?
Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for four reasons:
1. Would upgrade a valuable public service. The new facility would provide the fire
department and emergency services with a state of the art facility and equipment
to better serve the residents of Edina.
2. The proposal meets the conditional use permit findings. As demonstrated on
pages 5 -6 of this report the seven findings for a conditional use permit would be
met.
3. Other than the requested variances, the proposal meets all minimum zoning
ordinance standards. Also, the plan would preserve some of the mature trees
south of the building, and add landscaping around the building. (See page A7.)
4. The zoning board approved the requested variances at their February 15, 2007
meeting. See the justification for the variance approval on page 5 -6 of this report,
and the minutes of the meeting on page A14 —A15.
Staff Recommendation
Recommend that the city council approve a conditional use permit for a new fire station
at 6250 Tracy Avenue. Approval is based on the following findings:
The proposal meets the required conditional use permit standards.
2. The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because:
a. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the size of
the lot coupled with the 50 -foot setback requirement, which make it
difficult to locate a reasonably sized fire station with emergency
services on the site. In addition, there is a telecommunications
tower, mature trees, poor soils, and slopes along the south lot line,
that make it very difficult to build in that area.
b. The new fire station would generally be located within the front
building line of the existing fire station.
C. The driveway width is expanded to provide safe and quick access
in and out of the site. The intent of the width and setback
regulations for driveways is for single - family residential homes, and
not designed for emergency and fire services.
d. The City Engineer finds the proposed access off Tracy Avenue to
be reasonable.
Planning Commission Recommendation
On January 31, 2007, the planning commission unanimously recommended approval of
the proposed conditional use permit and variances as requested. (See pages A11—
A13.)
Zoning Board Approval
On February 15, 2007, the zoning board of appeals unanimously approved the
variances as requested. (See pages A14 —A15.)
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
Surrounding Land Uses
Northerly: Parkland; zoned and guided park.
Easterly: Single- family homes; zoned and guided low- density residential.
Southerly: Crosstown Highway 62.
Westerly Colonial Church; zoned R -1, low- density residential, and guided
public /semi - public.
Existing Site Features
The existing site is relatively flat, and contains the existing fire station.
Planning
Guide Plan designation
Zoning:
Conditional Use Permit
Public /Semi - public
R -1, Single- dwelling district
Per Section 850.04 Subd. 4.E, the City Council shall not grant a conditional use
permit unless it finds that the establishment, maintenance and operation of the use:
1. Will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental
to or endanger the public health, safety, morals and general welfare;
The new fire station would provide an upgraded facility to better serve and
protect the residents of Edina with fire protection, and emergency services. The
proposal would not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety,
morals and general welfare of the City of Edina.
2. Will not cause undue traffic hazards, congestion or parking shortages;
The uses on the property would remain the same. There would be no increase in
traffic.or need for parking.
3. Will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment, or decrease the value, of other
property in the vicinity, and will not be a nuisance;
The building would upgrade the existing structure on the site. The fire station is
.an existing use on the site, and will not decrease the value of property in the
vicinity or cause a nuisance as defined in Edina's nuisance ordinance.
4. Will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of other
property in the vicinity;
As mentioned, the use exists on'the site, and therefore, would not impede
development of property in the area.
5. Will not create an excessive burden on parks, streets and other public facilities;
The new fire station would not create a burden on parks, street or other public
facilities.
6. Conforms to the applicable restrictions and special conditions of the district in
which it is located as imposed by this Section; and
With the exception of the requested variances, the proposal meets all other
zoning ordinance requirements.
71 is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan
The use is conditionally permitted within the R -1 zoning district, therefore, is
consistent with the comprehensive plan.
Variance Justification
Per Section 850.04.Subd.1.F., of the zoning ordinance, a variance should not be
granted unless it is found that the strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause
undue hardship. As demonstrated below, staff believes the proposal meets the
variance standards, when applying the three hardship tests:
1) Are there practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from
complying with ordinance requirements?
Yes. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land
cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant
must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the Code and that
the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and
aesthetic concerns.
Staff believes the hardship for the buildings is caused by the size of the lot
coupled with the 50 -foot setback requirement, which make it difficult to locate a
reasonably sized fire station with emergency services on the site. (See page
Ma.) In addition, there is a telecommunications tower, mature trees, poor soils,
and slopes south of the existing building that would make it very difficult to build
in that area. (See page A8 and Al 0.)
The new fire station would generally be located within the front building line of
the existing fire station. The area of the building that extends beyond the existing
building line is primarily the front entry of the building. (See page A5.)
The building was designed from the existing garage toward Tracy Avenue. The
facility had to be designed with all the required facilities for a fire hall with
emergency services. In order to preserve the mature trees along the south side
of the building, avoid the poor soils in that area, and get in the necessary
equipment and work space, the building extended beyond the existing front
building line. The architect tried to stay within the existing front building line,
which has a setback of 30 feet. (See page A5.)
In regard to the variances for the front drive entrance; the existing drive entrance
is being expanded from 70 feet wide to 118 feet wide. The purpose of the
expansion is to provide safe and fast access out of the building for the
emergency vehicles.
As you see on the front elevation of the building, there would be 6 garage door
openings. Vehicles coming out of these doors would not have to negotiate the
curb cuts as they leave the site. Therefore, in terms of the public safety aspect of
the request, staff believes these variances are reasonable. The zoning standards
are established for residential properties, and not set up for the needs of
emergency services.
The City Engineer has reviewed the proposed access and finds them to be
acceptable. In fact, Section 1205.02. Subd. 9 states that the City Engineer may
grant exceptions to the driveway width and setback requirements to allow
reasonable access, provided that such exceptions do not result in conditions that
are hazardous to vehicular and pedestrian traffic.
2) Are there circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to
every similarly zoned property, and that are not self - created?
Yes. The unique circumstances are the existing building which does not meet the
required setback, the mature trees along the south lot line, and the emergency
service uses on the site. A fire station with emergency services is unique in the
residential zoning district.
3) Would the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood?
No. The use would not change on the property. The proposal is simply to replace .
the existing fire station. Also, the building would generally have the same
setback as the existing building, with the exception of the entry area; therefore,
the essential character of the neighborhood would not change.
Landscaping
Existing trees along the south lot line would be preserved, and a variety of
landscaping is proposed around the perimeter building. (See page A7.)
Traffic
Access to the site will be from Tracy Avenue and Colonial Way. When staff drives
the site, they would use the entrance off Colonial Way. When emergency vehicles
leave and return to the site, they would use Tracy Avenue. (See page A4.)
Building Design
As shown on the attached building elevations, the building will be primarily brick with
copper and masonry accents.
LOCATION MAP
I 6117
2815824 5820 5816 5812 5808 5804 5800 5712 5710 5708 5704 $700
6121
OLWGM BLVD
��11Yq y8y •
�/srsy
OZ 7D
ftAGy'4yP
C-07-1
Conditional Use Permit
City of Edina /EFD
6201 I
6105
8}16
6fi0 6124
6208
&%6212
6301 6300
6241
6237
6305 6304
L
6309 6308 9
24 63f3
6338
VALLEY I / rBYBp
PID:0511621210002
6250 Tracy Ave
Edina, MN 55436
ai
A%O To"
"w-
0-k
O
ulrot,.'�t�
1111)11
Legend
Highlighted Feature
House Number labels
Street Name Labels
NMunicipal Boundary
Streets
ff Creeks
Lake Names
Lakes
❑ Parks
ElParcels
LOGISMap Output Page Page 1 of 1
A 0^�
http:// gis. logis. org/ servlet/ com. esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceName =ed LOGISMap_OV &... 1/25/2007
LOGISMap Output Page Page 1 of 1
A3
http:// gis. logis .orglscrvleticom.esri.esrimap. Esrimap ?ScrviceName= ed_LOGISMap_OV &... 1/25/2007
L
COLON I AFL NARY
casw TREE • . . • -
<;± -
•�• � it � s 1 F �. ��' J _1. -_.. ..._ - -_ -. __ -,.._ 'SS�2S��'''� � '
Yf .��r�r mac. ���t�.. � i .••.. `• _•••�., ,•~• �
? ��. a � G!: �y`i �'k+'C -i r ,T t � I I I -rte 1 � r - -',� •'
:'S �.. _i2 t,.� 1* '� =- 1. � c91 �° Jr�• ..I; I.'r1r
M 5 •• f •tSf PIMPED SM NG tr
COLORED CC
rRM �i
� rtTR carp .w. Y f , w3d1 y
_ y r PRORD9F� 2 -STORY 9ALDIW '' • ar CURB
r'
•� 3 y ... k K I �I,,' q• ..'
LM
LLJ
SUMM
�. `T i"'�,. s" ♦ 33 a :.•-
o�
i
605iE a95 i r-a T
i
1 q
oco
SA "12'
- - - -1
0000
Mm YZE INTO �
_ o axe rum
Thtl PFWACY ��• i
G��� r No
I
i
COLONIAL NAY I
S- J}'^•'+ .tin ;i I
COLORED OC
W' i r •.
J�'` �L��� -,�-, f'��• ' -� -;-• JT-- •••'rte: `• - T•:lJ -•
i
. _--. " _'.� •_ .•i' f i,` R� 015.•6 • ".•' ,. mt tP PROPb3®?$TORY
t.' • . II'' ''
._ ya'^' rwg � lam'- x •.• �• z
LINE
LW
;.
�" A
DW
POLO
n/
,r-a 1 2'
I
7 22'-0 1
--
WALL
mv 7 r -0.
Wl. F �
1 i
S
7-,4
Y No
• 6�
��d
1002
E)GSnNrp
m 815JOO
MnNG
B�uli �,Pltm
ExtsnNG TREE 7"Va0partl
MENOMONIE& sknl =9�Ll,
IA
�- I M!2_2=2. �ikM�lmlm
Wr.
PROPOSM 2-STORY IEULVINS
FM 615.175
it 10
2
IL
•
-
p
Osw
-1.
P,
.4
Fl
41 4
V,
01
14
is —9 1
Wsrm
lkV
Ivory .0
'01
�m
OONC. PAno
sww AV—fl-
Y
.71 71
• � GR�� IN P�A�
T 7..777—
Ph—
A- -
.COLONIAL HAY µ's .:1
Milek --f!
Lr4 -s
.41
E;
6
-va-a rn- U. F-I +7Y:
CF)
SILT FEKZ
jF.
MIS
WPM
LLS
To monm u
SILT FE
h b ,.,
a
1L
cr
.c Aw.% w•v :l m c
-61161tr MALOW
FROPC= 2
FIFE 9MIS
W.qr FT-01T ...:• Jjj
ZEO.Mr
Imo"
J1O ewsrlNS e�w�ee ! t ¢ j 4v
NOT CLP v.--
-SILT
AM
bp
7'
9U1 6 E ATM m ROOT
Iy69rED MNE
PANT ALL NTS OVEN
,LAC w— 6 T.TM
SIgxEVM TAPE
o
t. �,y •x
10101 S.W-NM
Y S Q Y WLa
COHTOelw
—
_ SpEaND
m. TO TEA.—
k TAMP
10 ROIOK NR r
R� POC.ETS L —
a —
Bg SHRUB PLANTING
C sous: nor TO sGA,t
.l
S
3
u I mama
I Nx.a
w s
11 Le
�I I
1iiaFRTf:IT>7TPi.
ll �(•-� al `I �Smaeded ear. uua3r
ME
1 i 4
f
AN
p SCxLE . tC-0 P
Alan, I u
I �
� I
' I I
I I I
L li
Aeg
a
LAU05cAPE PLAn�
PLANT SCHEDULE
emval.al 0.mduvu.
Ou y
2
RU®2 MoSE 1' DA
S.W.". xema
Q—t wmowpa
wL'IIG xll� 3 5111M0 TWST
PlanUn Sbp
2 1/Y -Cal
!
It wAa WIE
! 2—XI—Me PRESS TTUM
FGN
S•UCEA I WL
Amum E9pn Yapb
STARS - 1W 6 STAR
t
_
SA"&TA
Ammnn Brlianu SxNC.Mrr7
e' 9kB Gump
TOYi
'
NOTE:
]-OOl
Ouonyh
sTARG AS REOAIFD
I . SA'1 ^'4
fsmmen Nms
TREE PLANTING —
GUY WIRES
f
Tannin re.
6-Gm
SCALE NOT TO SCALE
o
t. �,y •x
10101 S.W-NM
Y S Q Y WLa
COHTOelw
—
_ SpEaND
m. TO TEA.—
k TAMP
10 ROIOK NR r
R� POC.ETS L —
a —
Bg SHRUB PLANTING
C sous: nor TO sGA,t
.l
S
3
u I mama
I Nx.a
w s
11 Le
�I I
1iiaFRTf:IT>7TPi.
ll �(•-� al `I �Smaeded ear. uua3r
ME
1 i 4
f
AN
p SCxLE . tC-0 P
Alan, I u
I �
� I
' I I
I I I
L li
Aeg
a
LAU05cAPE PLAn�
PLANT SCHEDULE
emval.al 0.mduvu.
Ou y
2
symem
S.W.". xema
Q—t wmowpa
Fnmmen N-
Bur aml
PlanUn Sbp
2 1/Y -Cal
!
i Ace . ImmpM 'Jxlfwd
Amum E9pn Yapb
t 1 /1' -Cal
t
Am.lanWv . ym6llaro 'AUWmn eMWNKi
Ammnn Brlianu SxNC.Mrr7
e' 9kB Gump
Cad,. Ewyrwr
So— Imemxam
FMbdreeta Soa.a
]-OOl
Ouonyh
Sympm
sakm,mc Nmm
fsmmen Nms
Plmm�q SbP
10
Taan . waa Tanlon'
Tannin re.
6-Gm
m
+vxven,x somna 'umna
cmaar TarTNI +mwr
acal
9
AWp.ru. Ratan 'Arc,mP'
Artmdia halter
5 -Gm
v..nnlm
want'
S7mem
smwNlk Nmm
Common Nome
pbrmny SYa
9
clan nh 'Nerl Foa W
Feallw R.sd wn
t -Cm
16
IbuaNen 'Purple P__,
Pumle fate Cam Belle
1 -Cal
3a
Mama 'Revd S,armad'
Rayal S-- Mnb
1 -Cal
wamh
5>m6m
SIMTW ew
Co— Nam.
PbnGlp She
e
BW,wrb mlutaNyi'GRnuao Pyymy'
fltmeon p79'nr SO."
1 -Cal
6
O a l a
Nxn Ib.r.a'a.
>-Gm
1.
So— Imemxam
FMbdreeta Soa.a
]-OOl
— Ch—bW
S-Od
1!
mWrnteru 'Aaauxi
13-Ga1
6
RWw aroma4m 'Ge -Lek'
Cre -IPe Sumac
2 (Wl
9
Fumymue amcw 'Stn'
Ne eml Famymue
6-Gel
IANOSGPE NOTES:
�All panUnpe aM ,a M m nan arm dP. In attwdate eM AnwMCw Nursery s,ardmde. Np
9ed a..cd.a v.n w .nn,e. „x a acuvted.
t. P,anbw Sd eMll a a mlamn ar , pax Peat , oar, eat and , 0aM1 emtl.
3 N peme exml a plomllmed In aw 7en Irani U dab m acgWNe. — brkecope mdraata
— rani raau ole need m aaro9w pbme m nP admualm, mm m w em.r amx9 w kanmh P.lad
.. N Vw alro. M MW ana .roPe.e w tlgPn F 6PtmL
e. N Neee m eo0 msF ellm IH.'e a 1' deq m1rWM0 bah mulM mammnmNe bpd. S' b dmraln.
6. Sod Ylmf b aiWmd xenWaq 6tue9m.e Ire d keede da cbmP. lae Imdecvw md%— .ndl
Ilan i W , Nd M nox.d , oe Ca—p amu. b JIa n9•Pnax as np_t y P. kMm Wpb•
aanll«tpr.
7. N Nrvb x.de and areas NNICdM oe ncWln9 eNndded 6ar4 mulct Nall 1a a a' dew Iqw d
w.ddw Bork muNA ew ONa la6rk. All yrwM caw arw Nlml rNebe p t' layer pl multi dN no
Tw-
fiW loark.
e. w ar.a. ,n.n .od aw mdcn leua mw nn. wxo w. wb •da•r n mn.n a ddax.
9. N pandn9 brand, a p—g ar.ae mld 9mund caw 6eae tlm. nave a mWmum d ,• deaf
pallM .pe mdead. n eW w w bNeeape eatwni a r.e —Sll a rwrotW ran aamq
Snredded ft,. Vucn d.ene aM eYmaw eo6 m orvele. N. PYamt9 a a ww .rae.
t0. aodud euOeNUtloru mm1 a aoemwd 6Y e,na, 9•^mal aarlUaclw s ml�caW Yam pMa
m Wbxoeen
11. P d, b%p . bml — — Mv —ono. md— mmtT -0.
rti
.1 y"
�G
HAY DOBBS
•xndla,IdW
IIARImG
wwW.Naydobb..com
Y.S. e..x P1.R.
270 5. SIN, St., S O, 16S
Yl nn.. Pella, YN
SSe0129i.
T.I. 612.776..590
1... 617.227. 40a7
coM +OI IDIN• ML DDI1,fY0,i
Rwe.lOypOTA9W
1R e9•CYbllI
•NVO�Nluf
ryX
NOT�O�pOO��ON
�6TUlf:
,w raaT.iinm bdo.min
warn w.: almLla
OLTE N.tfpJ
.LV'e1016:
1 ro.r mmn Tx•T T,n r1A,L
N4AMA„ON M IWR WNI®7a®
ry er a ula. N. osier N.o,vdlal
YDTIYTIN•lurumem
� °°O1MUen TTK ST•lE
-r�s -Na
-ten
WR-
Ll 00
%
EN
, gg
21
N
OWN"
fi
;N
ELE Fi-r
119 r,
4' 'r"
rp rlrLD
AT
City of Edina
MEL
m °— .0 nmm
®Oat, com f1
MTL
l
am. Um MCK, cam #1 '
UOK MOM CORM.
M
vlasx
WuL
9m1. cam I=
�lw_v
..
swC Cann /1 y
' - 1/Y nMK MTE)01 aaoa R4L 113IG1
m UOM — oo an: m -
- - - N IW 011. 00011 - -. faNIE (Rm) _ �WIAM FILL y OOIC
East
Elevation - Alt ' er,nat -e 0' 8'
16' 32
- 1
DATE: - .23 January, 2007
- PROJECT NO.: % -06004.004
-
_ - , .. - ' .E d: i
_ }
n - a' F i r e s l ap t i o n N . o:. I . .. ..
Scale 1 /16 = 1' - 0•
- '' - HAY
r
DOBBS.. - -'
City of Edina
�'m � + �
r
' .�-..
,� .` __. ,
' r ,, � , .
r.
_
;� Y S�
�xf,
i
>�
V ;�
.t,
t
....f ..
� �
L
PC Meeting 1/31/07
C -07 -1 Conditional Use Permit
City of Edina
6250 Trace Avenue r,
`N,
Mr. Teague presented his staff report.;/ / <I
Mr. Teague concluded staff recommends thatlhe City COUncil approve a`
Conditional Use Permit for a new fire station at,6250 Tracy Avenue. Approvafls
based on the following:
1. The proposal meets the required_ conditiorial,yuse permit standards.
2. The proposal meets the required standards for a variance,
because:
a. There is a unique hardship to the.property caused by the
small size of the lloYcoupledwith the 50 -foot setback
requirement, which make it ` diffcult to locate a reasonably
sized fire; station with emergency services on the site. In.
addition; there are mature trees, -poor soils, and slopes along
the south lot line, that make it difficult to build in that area.
b. the,yan ce woul meet the intent of the ordinance
% because the new fire station would generally be located
`wjthin the, r nt building line of the existing fire station.
C. The driveway width is expanded to provide safe and quick
access'out of the site. The intent of the width and setback
regulations for driveways is for single - family residential
homes; and/not designed for emergency and fire services.
The CiVEngineer finds the proposed access off Tracy
Avenue to be reasonable.
Edina Fire Chief Marty Scherer and Mr. Gary Hay of Hay Dobbs were
present to respond to questions from the Commission.
Ail
E
Chief Scherer told the Commission a neighborhood meeting was held to
inform neighbors of the proposal with neighbors indicating their support for the
project.
Mr. Hay addressed the Commission and explained the existing fire station
does not meet today's requirements for fire and rescue or meets the standard
requirements for female fire and rescue personnel. Mr:.Hay said the Edina Fire
Department will now be called Edina Fire and Rescue,, adding,70,percent of all
calls are rescue and 30 percent of all calls are fire. With graO'hicsWr. Hay
pointed out details of the proposed new fire and /'rescue station ta.include
accommodations for female fire and rescue personnel. doncluding; Mr. Hay
explained the existing fire station also did not meet with'today's.technical
standards nor were the existing fire bays adequate to accommodate the size of,`
today's emergency vehicles.
Chair Lonsbury noted the building requires, setback variances from the
Zoning Code and asked Commissioners for their input oh-Ahe project and
required variances.
Commissioner Fischer said it appears to him th itan important element for
a fire and rescue station is location, adding this' location is perfect with direct
access to a major highway system. Cont nuiof , Commissioner Fischer stated
the size of the parcel could be/considered a;,fiardship because it can't adequately
accommodate a reasonably sized fire station with emergency services if the
required setbacks were strictl� imposed.
Chair Lonsbury pointed out'as a corner lot (with Cross -town Highway to
the south), that-it-should also\Oe noted,that the property directly adjacent (north)
to the subject site is City.Park property. Chair Lonsbury concluded this piece of
property is ve ry uni ue.
Commissioner Staunton said he agrees the lot is small; however, that may
not be adequate as hardship. Commissioner Staunton said other facts are also
important including the fact that a fire station has existed on this site for many
years and the,proposed renovation and rebuild is only maintaining what has
A discussion en'sued,between Commissioners noting the subject property
is uniquely locafecl. Highway and roadway to the south and east, City Park to the
north and wetlands and Colonial Church to the west. Commissioners also noted
the subject site is a fire station that has been operating from this location for
years, adding the renovations and rebuild of the fire station are important to the
entire community of Edina.
I
11
Commissioner Brown moved to recommend Conditional Use Permit
approval. (with variances) subject to the plans presented and subject to the
conditions and findings presented by City Staff noting:
• The proposal. upgrades a valuable public service. The new facility would
provide the fire department and emergency services with a state of the art
facility and equipment to better serve the residents of Edina.
• The proposal meets the conditional use permit findings %",,\
• The proposal meets all minimum zoning ordinance standards other than
the requested variances; adding the vafiances are justified,and meet the
three hardship tests of; reasonable use, , unique circumstances, and the
proposed new station would not alter' the- esse 'tip character of , the
neighborhood. ;' v
1.
Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion: All votec�aye; motiocarried.
M�
Zoning Board Minutes from the February 15, 2007 meeting.
Z -07 -6 City of Edina
6250 Tracy Avenue, Edina, MN
Multiple Variances
Mr. Teague presented his staff report
multiple variances to construct a new fire re;
Mr. Teague concluded the Planning Coi
at their January 31, 2007, meeting and unanirr
the requested variances, adding staff supports
proposal meets the required standards for va6
Chief Scherer and Mr. Gary Hay
to respond to questions.
Mr. Hardy asked Mr. Tea
Mr. Teague responded in the aff
subject site is zoned. Mr. Tea. g
Single Dwelling Unit District., `Mr
is permitted in the R -1 dist6at as
to clarify for him conditional use.
district(s) certain-land uses are
parks, golf courses, churches, a
good o/T he community. Contin
uses require'a 50 foo "etback f
instance, maintaining the 50 foot
site, adding the lot just isn'#,large
explained the
seeking
sly recommended approval' of
request as'submitted. The
ay Dobbs were present
gue ithe`existing fire bulldinis non - conforming..
if - native: M,r. Hardy asked -Mr. Teague what the
ue responded the-- subject'site is zoned R -1,
.Teague explained the;land use as a fire station
a conditional ,use__M� Hardy asked Mr. Teague
Cllr. Teague said in the residential zoning
permitted as conditional uses to include schools,
nd otherpublic facilities that serve the greater
uirig', Mr. Teague explained that all conditional
rom all property lines. Mr. Teague noted in this
setback requirement imposes a hardship on the
-`:enough to accommodate that setback
v77 n v...v....
�`C,hief Scherer addressed;the Board and informed the Board a
neighborhood meeting was held informing residents of the proposed plan to
renovate and`rebuild tPfe Edjria Fire Station. Chief Scherer told the Board
neighbors have expresseo/their support.
Mr. Grabiel explained he is a member of the Planning Commission and
said another important point to remember in the redevelopment of the site is that
a rebuild is necessary to accommodate female fire and rescue personnel and to
achieve larger bays to accommodate new emergency vehicles. Chief Scherer
said that is correct, adding in the old building new fire and rescue vehicles would
air
have to be special ordered to accommodate the existing bays, the rebuild of the
fire station won't require special order vehicles.
Mr. Grabiel moved variance approval subject to the plans presented
noting the importance of retaining this location to house a fire and rescue facility
and noting that the small lot size and required setbacks for conditional uses if
adhered to would severely compromise what could be built on the site. Notice
should also be given to the fact that the subject site is abutted by�a City park and
a church. Mr. Hardy seconded the. motion. All vgted aye; mo ti on carried.
Chair Skallerud said he fully supports the re
the size of the site at least in his opinion isn't' a-har
reasons to support the request including the 'public
topography of the site and that the site is surrtind
and a church. Chair Skallerud said another importa
mentioned, is that the site has been used as a fire,
City is only maintaining what already exists. Chair
submitted; however,
ding there are other,
cation-of the site.
ed by {park
nt:fact'to..
station for
him, as previously
great project and a new fire and rescue station is'irnportant to the
adding he fully supports the request as tubmitted, ,.
P)�
years and the
ided this is a
ublic welfare,
(r
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor & City Council
Cary Teague
City Planner
February 20, 2007
REPORURECOMMENDATION
Ordinance No. 2007 -03 —
Amending Section 850 of the
City Code Regarding
Variance Denials
Recommended Action:
Adopt the ordinance.
Information /Background:
Agenda Item: III. B.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
Action: ❑
El
To H RA
To Council
Motion
Resolution
Ordinance
Discussion
Recently, the City had an applicant for a variance immediately re -apply for the same
variance that had just been denied by the Zoning Board of Appeals on a 2 -2 vote. Since
the member of the Zoning Board rotate, the variance was approved by a different set of
Board members.
As a result, the Planning Commission directed staff to investigate how other cities
regulated variance applications that were denied. The chart on page 2 shows that most
cities have time requirements before a new application can be made for the same
project. Time limits range from 6 to 24 months. By establishing a time limit before the.
same application can be made, the circumstance of applicants re- applying for the same
variance, in hopes of getting a new decision from a different Board, is eliminated.
At last months meeting, the planning commission unanimously recommended that
applicant's for variances that have been denied must wait 12 months before the same
application is made.
The following is the proposed language:
No application for a variance, which has been denied in whole or in part, shall be
resubmitted within twelve (12) months of the date of the order of denial, except
that a new application may be permitted to the same denying board, if new
evidence or a change of circumstances warrant it.
Supporting Information
Survey of Metro Cities:
CITY
REGULATION
Burnsville
No application for a variance which has been denied in whole or in part
shall be resubmitted within 6 months of the date of the order of denial,
except upon grounds of new evidence or upon proof of change of
conditions.
Eagan
No application of a property owner for a variance shall be considered
within a period of 12 months following a denial of such request,
except that a new application may be permitted if new evidence or a
change of circumstances warrant it.
St. Louis Park
Must wait 24 months to re- apply. New application can be made only if
there is a change in the physical conditions of the property or land.
Apple Valley
Must wait 12 months to re- apply. A New application can be made
only if there are significant changes or circumstances.
Plymouth
Must wait 6 months to re- apply. New application can be made only if
there is a change in the physical conditions of the property or land.
Minnetonka
Must wait 12 months to re- apply. New application can be made only if
there is a significant change in the physical conditions of the property
or land.
New Brighton
No limit.
Lakeville
A similar application for a variance affecting substantially the same
property shall not be considered again by the Planning Commission or
Board for at least 6 months from the date of its denial; and a
subsequent application affecting substantially the same property shall
likewise not be considered again by the Planning Commission or
Board for an additional six (6) months from the date of the second
denial unless a decision to reconsider such matter is made by a four -
fifths 4/5 vote of the full Board.
Eden Prairie
No limit.
Woodbury
No re- application by a property owner for a variance shall be
submitted to the council within a 12 month period following a denial of
such a request, except the council may permit a new application or
reconsideration if, in the opinion of the council, new evidence or
change of circumstances warrants it.
Hopkins
Must wait 6 months to re- apply. New application can be made only if
there is a significant change in the physical conditions of the property
or land.
ORDINANCE NO. 2007-03
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE SECTION 850.04, SUBDIVISION 1,
CONCERNING VARIANCE DENIALS
The City Of Edina Ordains:
Section 1. Sub Section 850.04, Subdivision 1, is amended to add the following
paragraph:
L. Denial: No application for a variance which has been denied in whole or in
part shall be resubmitted within twelve (12) months of the date of the order
of denial, except that a new application may be permitted to the same
denying board, if new evidence or a change of circumstances warrant it.
Section 2. Passed and adopted this day of 1 , 2007.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do
hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by
the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2007, and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2007
City Clerk
To:
From:
Date:
Subject:
Mayor & City Council
Cary Teague
City Planner
February 20, 2007
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
Preliminary Plat Approval
_Haugland Co. 5000 France
_Ave, Edina, MN
Recommendation:
Approve the preliminary plat.
Information /Background
Agenda Item: III. C.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑
Action: ❑
El
To HRA
To Council
Motion
Resolution
Ordinance
Discussion
The applicant is proposing a preliminary plat for the final development plan that was
approved for-this site by the City Council on May 3, 2005. A condition of that approval
was to plat the property. No changes are proposed from the originally approved plans.
(See original plans on pages A16 —A25.) The plat simply creates tracts for the various
uses and elevations within the project. (See proposed tracts on pages A4 —A15.) The
plat is similar to a townhome plat, that occurs after a structure is built, so the tracts can
be accurately surveyed.
Primary Issue
a Is the proposed subdivision reasonable for this site?
Yes. The applicant is simply platting individual tracts for the already approved
development plans, so that individual uses have their own tract. Again, there are no
changes proposed to the original plans. There will be two owners of the various
tracts. The Haugland Company would maintain ownership of all of the retail tracts
and the outside walls of the residential space; and the condominium association
would own the interior residential portion of the project.
Staff Recommendation
Approve the Registered Land Survey, dated November 13, 2006, subject to following
condition:
The city must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or
receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will
be void.
Planning Commission Recommendation
On January 31, 2007, the planning commission unanimously recommended approval of
the proposed preliminary plat. (See minutes on page A26.)
3930
24
3945
® 0
3924 1 3922
60TH Sr w
3939 3917
24
3979 24
d
0
a, PAY'
LOCATION MAP
4908
3906
3902
3911 ■ 5000
5050
Pr�
S -07 -1
Preliminary Plat
PID: 1802824410179
5000 France Ave S
Edina, MN 55424
Nr
I I IIJH
Legend
Manse Number Labels
Street Name Labels
.! Municipal BourWary
Streets
/If Creeks
Lake Names
Lakes
Parks
❑ Parcels
L 5020
4050
5034
5036
5050
Pr�
S -07 -1
Preliminary Plat
PID: 1802824410179
5000 France Ave S
Edina, MN 55424
Nr
I I IIJH
Legend
Manse Number Labels
Street Name Labels
.! Municipal BourWary
Streets
/If Creeks
Lake Names
Lakes
Parks
❑ Parcels
LOGISMap Output Page Page 1 of 1
/1 A
http:// gis. logis. org/ servlet/ com. esri.esrimap.Esrimap ?ServiceName =ed LOGISMap_OV &... 1/24/2007
a
N
So m IN ' and
0 20 40 e0
..7M OFD u SE 1/4 OF SEC 14
I
"" mc7, � L_ a Fm
II — Kea
`-rDSf fOl BDQT DIOrlOaplf-� mummm amIRE
Pak Dor ma KN121S hSlan naI
O�
n
LECEM
i O CATCH OA91
\P v
4
EE OAS VALVE
�+
■ NA1d101E
E705TENG BUILDINGS
3911 50TH STREET WEST
b
WILDING FOOTPRINT 13,970 SO. FT.
�
i LIGHT POLE
((f
.�
LOT
TOP 1A/f OF NW7AANT AT THE HE CmeSIl OF
EST 00TH SDtEFT AND MANX AVD4E SOUTH.
ELEVAMON SM71
LECEM
i O CATCH OA91
■ EIEO11eC amt
4
EE OAS VALVE
■ NA1d101E
V NVORANT
'•
SET Im NONm m
i LIGHT POLE
((f
.�
�=E= OAS. PARK MEN
�4
} am
1
.. +r DOL PLOT am
;
• SAt1RART MANN ME
`; 1
O
' m Tair 1ONE SON
a ■ ELECTRIC 1MNSPOROL
L it
• WATER NARIOIE--
' as WATER VALVE
- -
GUARDRAIL
III
GASVA1N
1 WATER/A01
I n SANRATIT SERER
$TORN SETTER
OVERHEAD Om1TIES
sW
E
TRUE
O
mow!
I:�
v m
t
//NYY
45
9
3
N
UN7R MO Aa400R scrom G
� I� � r
pm 00C. iT� 4l ONNA SMpmA ImfA =
i ON
�►y^ryd3 �
mmm
6, .is ?ING
1 19
87.00
II f T• A�
I��ma -� F � M4WR it
--TIE SOUTN 7 A. OF THE NOR714 40 R.
RANGE THE uSE 1/4 OF SEC 14 WP
T. 2a.
__- -__ ------ _- ---- -- 130.0 -- -___
EMSTING BUILDING
BLDG. FOOTPRINT 13.393 S0. FT.
'l- -------- -- - -- 07.0 ------ -- --- --
PARCEL 1
16,371 sq. ft
0.3758 acres
LOT
J
O
49.00
— -TIC lNE C
A _..1'{4:1•
B
EVA
roa.ao
1l�1aTFRAMMOKESTUCCO
it) Rv6y
_ L.ECALMSCAPMM
® .Ceun� X43 trt d t1r [m1 01 tr1 01Wao4 Audleh Bedddoo *maw m
mm* I,/A I 1M Shot 07 M d IM Fm1 130 M! d Gr GwU 7 fed d Ib MvN 40 1rl d IM Seu1Me
Ouatr d SpaLlm'14 TooMb 24 Rmq� p4, eaxrft m tM UMW Std. OeNnml.lt Su w,
..a aw d. h INngYI Canty. IOmaoln
r 1
AeAed P�5000 Fat�
® 1 o Nrlowl m rmn A— Sar01. [!M. YYnaels
✓ Q I
p1 0a1C O
'6885
i— — —
1 I I I
•�-- -- 1 I I I -
� v 1
w
ell 1 I a
- • 1 I
J ' U II
2
�1wII
w e1s7A e ;
1
Chi MAMW
To Ildlellda AeodalaA a N1-NC.11 0e1Wd pame'd16. H--&" Ckew-m m canpar} UP
aN Ow mpi! Nothow 71W Iterates CalialF
TSk to m -ft es4 tldr -W or 00 ar tlr aawy an ddm R to !sd — male k
oeladaloo d1A ft'Mb& n Sloldad Ddd flaedarrlb Ier ALTA/ACSN UW TAk Surwp'
7 admOdrd oW afatW M AL7A ACSY en0 1®! h low geoof. Paralalt m eta
Slaldadp oo eweplW Vy ALTA NSpS aw ACSY alw to $Mel oo a dda d Udo
NN, edlSuela aewyri a�aa saUAoo slot prapW 111w proceAvoo, a1.b1n1.ImtLa1, aw
er.la>W a adW m
h er 90.1bue aW Ooesa
SoCuinorooft f a r r Sun" m me—Nab mad, c000,
U" Bnrla S. A /Acm od Tk suroow
0. Ckom lloaard w r
IDal000b xeig
Dolt Drmreor 14 2004
1. /NI'Ninry�� an kanolal land k el. ealooRnall fa ==.24p=
4y Ow Ri X 1Na 0 — Caleel} ft Co. 0maIyS00 -C,
2. TSa k.U- d undryasw ulalia on bpd Worn ardmla Irepa mood$ aw edd
IeMlola TM %-11- aoy not be aooeL
3. AS d ,N— as M foot.
4 111a CoW .11 - IN monad
4 lSa one of er pworl7 dooa4pd mew IN 111,101 agile, foot or 037011 eerr
7. 71r 7rW W17 deoo ed b k • — =. mr epm�q m eta faded One0aw.7
WleeerlWll�Aplay� kaayse Ibm 1100 OaaaM77 Pmd Na 210100 0002 4
4 doo11WW e. d [dYa a1Wlb tlr mlan mleq kr 0..m k PW7 2 Pk-W
DNA Vol Sles eta p1 17 d000 nd OOrelr melts eaaq AVW No Notion!
4 BJ310 oncro w oo do" Wed 00e1 Stud rw do" Rase AM South.
ALTA /ACSM
LAND TITLE SURVEY
FRANCE AVE. SOUTH
EDINA, MINNESOTA
..r
1� i Engineers • Sur"'Zo A..N
Landscape Architects p..w em
Nlml 11ap moo, a- kC �•••
` ,..ra..�... ..ar MA,
Cee asaa ru nap aae.r
4
-
g
�4
1
1
w�l
gV
a
I
III
Chi MAMW
To Ildlellda AeodalaA a N1-NC.11 0e1Wd pame'd16. H--&" Ckew-m m canpar} UP
aN Ow mpi! Nothow 71W Iterates CalialF
TSk to m -ft es4 tldr -W or 00 ar tlr aawy an ddm R to !sd — male k
oeladaloo d1A ft'Mb& n Sloldad Ddd flaedarrlb Ier ALTA/ACSN UW TAk Surwp'
7 admOdrd oW afatW M AL7A ACSY en0 1®! h low geoof. Paralalt m eta
Slaldadp oo eweplW Vy ALTA NSpS aw ACSY alw to $Mel oo a dda d Udo
NN, edlSuela aewyri a�aa saUAoo slot prapW 111w proceAvoo, a1.b1n1.ImtLa1, aw
er.la>W a adW m
h er 90.1bue aW Ooesa
SoCuinorooft f a r r Sun" m me—Nab mad, c000,
U" Bnrla S. A /Acm od Tk suroow
0. Ckom lloaard w r
IDal000b xeig
Dolt Drmreor 14 2004
1. /NI'Ninry�� an kanolal land k el. ealooRnall fa ==.24p=
4y Ow Ri X 1Na 0 — Caleel} ft Co. 0maIyS00 -C,
2. TSa k.U- d undryasw ulalia on bpd Worn ardmla Irepa mood$ aw edd
IeMlola TM %-11- aoy not be aooeL
3. AS d ,N— as M foot.
4 111a CoW .11 - IN monad
4 lSa one of er pworl7 dooa4pd mew IN 111,101 agile, foot or 037011 eerr
7. 71r 7rW W17 deoo ed b k • — =. mr epm�q m eta faded One0aw.7
WleeerlWll�Aplay� kaayse Ibm 1100 OaaaM77 Pmd Na 210100 0002 4
4 doo11WW e. d [dYa a1Wlb tlr mlan mleq kr 0..m k PW7 2 Pk-W
DNA Vol Sles eta p1 17 d000 nd OOrelr melts eaaq AVW No Notion!
4 BJ310 oncro w oo do" Wed 00e1 Stud rw do" Rase AM South.
ALTA /ACSM
LAND TITLE SURVEY
FRANCE AVE. SOUTH
EDINA, MINNESOTA
..r
1� i Engineers • Sur"'Zo A..N
Landscape Architects p..w em
Nlml 11ap moo, a- kC �•••
` ,..ra..�... ..ar MA,
Cee asaa ru nap aae.r
NITY MAP
m of
:f�S'. •' V ,5^ H
- --- �� - - -- �rms reo.aD.' �.
O
al '°
e• I L
iRAerB a AND 1
I I �; I Gov `. •- v _ -.J J� --I
ACT. RN r
Q I
LOT 4'7
I LOT r, 45` � o�
I I 5v�
"ACT BI C AWL
sj
O
�3g�• 4 J 1 I•_l ' •I II LU
r Q
J 1 n
,
(yf
d 2L
3 N h
g 5 y - iRACiB E AND 0 gY,
LOT 45
6a �j "• �- �n SNP a ___Af'9b1_
d�
° I W uiR. Tfa d; tuPARCEL m.w 02
+ eT. r...
'A H ...
f1 M n a
SB9'BO•E — 00.0
i.. Fes..�c Hnm°Yc
:,plci.l 5
go I II I
I rT III
II I I" I II I
Ib
PRELIMINARY REGIS
LAND SURVEY
SPECIAL NOTES
�.,w....Y.....w Y.
BENCHMARK
GENERAL NOTES
.T rr r.rcr�frrwlw af.n fma Y.
• w www. Nry w mTIQID'..
f. w cwcd afrf 4
n n n fn:
few w.qw•. Wr f4f» fa -
>�>!• al +fr. r Yswr M Hr r"r�b Y s.wb r
iof-m -awn,.
DEVELOPFN
qw rw"�Aw. 1w
SURVEYOR AND ENGNEER
N
N E
,isa e
,DES(
n
p eww. m w,rwr
c.. Hxa fwY
�: aww.av,NY d
SH arlw W°,°
fD�w � b°wN.w
fww +rr ww.
f.. r
ewww twat M �r
a..Y, aw. Avw 11wak tae
may- aw•Y. WY O".w fw,yrnr IM.
U bMn 0.M fMw•
_
wrvHanue CERTlFTCARON
I
SbIEN
-
1f�mAw.wf
" °'
D :'mn°"re d,.a.°m.� ,i°
I n°r °mr m°' ur " '°
P'°: T�•= -°'.
WEST 60TH STREET
8 00 FRANCE, LLC
Schnell Madson "���
d _.fir • m •!
S
58 0 OPUS PARKING
7�n
wfe,g Q�®
Yf
JOB BOOK NUMBER: (152 -7)
F
FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH
EDINA, MN.
SUITE 108
HRa11fi. „aN,�,
FIELD PAGE. 12
MINN POLIS,MN.88949
e
BOOK: 658
Bum a xnc°s
pale llwwr Nw 1f6]F
I SHEET NO. 1 OF 2
ELEVATION MEW
ND SCAS
PRELIMINARY RE(3I5_lI_I:_-KtU
-A
MAU -
MAU
MAU-
MAU - I
TRACT ZZ
---.I
- A—
TMA ""C
MAU
-ACT -
TRACT NN
TRACT W
MAU PP
TRACT CR
TRACT 0
MAU 0
TRACT TT
W1.
TRACT CC
TRACT W
TRACT ME
we I A
TRAtt GO
vAa.m
FACT R
MAU .
TRACT KK
TRACT V
TRACT V
W=T IT
TRACT Y
TRACT 2
TRACT M
-ACT So
Tm an
=7 --
rQT mr an
TRACT o
1
TRACT a I TRACT
TRACT I
F'
MAU 0
TRACT
I
regal IQI
------
------
TRACT c
TRACT
TRACT A
1"-'
TRACT A
MAU —
ELEVATION MEW
ND SCAS
PRELIMINARY RE(3I5_lI_I:_-KtU
W
w— .1—)
REVISIONS b,m �d �d CFRTIFICAnnw LOCARON CLIENT
A. Y Wo d -.1 6 100 FRANCE, LLC
d'y 'f 'd d. WEST 60TH STREET re So OPUS PARKING
Schnell Madson FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 108
Pt-ing ao..00 &.v,, JOB, BOOK NUMBER: (I 4i-7) EDINA, MN. MIN FAPOLIS, MN. 65343
FIELD BOOK: $58 PACE: 12 DAIQ O. NICKOLB SHEET NO- 2 OF 2
L Mo.
LAND SURVEY�
BENCHMARK
LEGEND
DEVELOPER
F.
SURVEYOR AND ENGINEER
0 .dObe
W1.
IV
W
w— .1—)
REVISIONS b,m �d �d CFRTIFICAnnw LOCARON CLIENT
A. Y Wo d -.1 6 100 FRANCE, LLC
d'y 'f 'd d. WEST 60TH STREET re So OPUS PARKING
Schnell Madson FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH SUITE 108
Pt-ing ao..00 &.v,, JOB, BOOK NUMBER: (I 4i-7) EDINA, MN. MIN FAPOLIS, MN. 65343
FIELD BOOK: $58 PACE: 12 DAIQ O. NICKOLB SHEET NO- 2 OF 2
L Mo.
REGISTERED LAND SURVEY N0.
HFTRRM COLN". bwGUMA
I nrmT eaaY mr a maNas am Mee+ a nbmb on amaa. mebbA a lam m mmaa � w anym w
mmha a�b.a womb amrb h w Mob d nvmh 6w a lmvsb b ah
VAam l
W 41. A.abs HaJWbe AbiOe 172
Alw
TAm Am r wi ohm tb.a, m Mm m M pa r Auab. nhadtlm ambe In aha! eeum r w sera b oft
araol vaa. m 6c1Yn 16 Taeimb ml Reim !1, me bmm, M nhmW anmtlm. r w � b mb m w ma b
m la1 h, m aa1eY peL
rm on r l.a a A.m� namrin wue laA beer a hl:
memalq a M murm my a lr a. mr Nrab� pm. am m m m.er hvhY a Nem s ey.. m wrtr m
..wm wA aam w mn b m rb 1.1 .T, a attlom m imm Ala b w mena.11 mme m .ob n, mmm
minty Abnh m d1PAm m 0ASb m mmm 4eL rsw .ah w nea b r m 1a1 a 1 a Jllaib .a bee m.s
ba 0 oar.. m Weer m ®b !mA - ra w d b m m lr a 0 abeam r maa bib mmm !mn m
Aqr f0 edul 0 11 mmmr a.s, • aamm m mm bM aram .aNr.maaa dap . mme.aln mrw memr b w
mw.mt ft a mba era. a m aq:r m �w m m ®e. me a rv�e r m.m b.! a seem r an7 r b w
r b a M raA Isom r r ra lr a a.re amn o ayr m al.am m �r !mt �
aamm m ata ba b M mm b r w ama Rm Im! r hi! ld N M y m aqr m mkM m mmm
!mt dm! M .va b r am smm N mm r.m o aqr m .amem m mms mat sma m ma ar a aware
m lIIm W b w awn r e.Oft
N meeSra b M rmeall pa a. M4 Naamh Mob vu�m
1 bey —ft wt ab a.mne.. w narT he.b b a mrr arbmeaal a W arms
o.l.a ab mr a m_
oar a nmmb ima aerane
lma umm n. loo
mwA IwblQaTA
� lb. lAa.ta) m M Plamq OmmWl r M OaT m fwi Yll.mrp Y hey mla/ tlm! a ab my a
m _� w aq r Wm mma hr mb aAarpr b ab wvAary Mmame a
.0. a.A " memr a4
ler mee.s ea y maara mN aAlbe m w Mmbtlm h b avail► ab e.mar la.-.e! alrlr b
ma.d r oml . ea+A.a n ln. a smr mum r w Iaaa oom r oawma
nAm.leT r w..p Mmibaar
M% W A
hmhT aelaT dm ub Repels.! law asq a mm..a bT M CRI F a ft Mrmbaar a M Cy r fam a . mrlm
amm w w M r m
QIY au O0n &ah .
a! Amt Qy G
TWA= awem WAffnVM N—b oaab lamsm
1 bmbp mry Ir e® aamb h m— N Pb pe. bam br ew b new alv0.a m ab alyar.a W alr•}
o.er ab W a m
Pam* a WM w amrmb Map AWb
aY amap
mwK Mom lbnmb foals Mn
11.msA b a STA% am amum (lam) M lepmr.! W BvmT r es w.ma ab y a
awah a. m - Mmnmb MW awae
I®wM v mm anrmb Mob lai -
n soma mlrh mr arY aepWA. 1N a.q a._ .m nm h bmr alb b.b y m
dtl.a �a
. .a..a a cv+t a.pr.m a ram
D."
SCHOELL MADSON
PLANNING • ENGINEERING • SURVEYING
SHEET 1 OF 10 SHEETS
REGISTERED LAND SURVEY N0.
HENNEPIN COUNTY. MNNESOTA
unu¢sr1A:gV�a-
4G' FRANCE Al ENUE: Multi
!' I
I
NOW2D W te a_ 328.00
—
999 3100 � --
YIN�
f_ i I I � —wr ubalmul I
W a
r 1 I
CT I » I i a / I.
44
� y
He
Gi g b
bx -
-3 8
8 I S
S 9 I i
i ,y Sp' I
I T
TRACT AN HAS NO VMCAL LUM
g I ^
^iii I
I TRACT HHH g I '
'
py I
I T
TRACT 1001 Ig5 KM aLVATICN 577.00 FM
1-- §
I b
§
LOT 47 i b
b ,
,I B
BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BMW ON THE EAST UNE 0P I J8, AMID.
bk I
b i
i y I
I ` 7
I S
N007C20'W
yy a
aQaQ 7
78 S
S I
BET1pIWf00 TOP NUT OF X19RANT IN NORTXME7T QUADRANT OF
T b
BBA16 FEET (NOYO20 �
jj ' c�
r4 H.HTT I 45 a
a l
41 I
F n memo _ I j v. sr v0inr u
vUr 47
I I
I I SORO'20'E 20287
Cl ' .lsr uw[ n na FASr iEO f
a rvo.m m�
I I
3 '
I F-T r i I
I I I l_[1T 45 I �_ M rises I
I I ,Yr00._i]� I , rttT aT nor �e
SORO'20'E I
I I
SCHOELL MADSON
PLANNING • ENGINEERING • SURVEYING
SHEET 2 OF 10 SHEETS
SCHOELL MADSON
PLANNING • ENGINEERING • SURVEYING
SHEET 2 OF 10 SHEETS
a
REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO.
HENNEPIN COUNTY, WNHESOTA
[q
Z �
m 1e m u
NO'20'2CrW 29&00 —
22270 feaua Y InIff ) .
S7 0-20-E
TRACT FFF' /NOOmw
8
9
z TRACTS A. HT. AND GO0 LM BE119II1 ELEVATIONS
m
TRACT A 8 807.17 FEET AND 677 .OD FEET
G BEAMNGS SHOWN AM BASED ON THE EAST WE GP
lDT 49. AM SUM N0. 172 HAS AN ASSTMD
REARM OF NOO.2C2O'9
ENGMAAM TOP NUT OF WMRANT IN NOMHWEFT
QUADRANT OF WEST 90TH SLEET AND FRANCE AVENUE
SOUTH. ELEVATION a 967.10 FEET (NM29) �.
SO7O'20'E 199.97
o `. ZtEeW= TRACT GGG
2
` - S
NOO tlY2O'9I P
Of •ir47�y,�t�' I O9f
{019
SO20'20'E
SCHOELL MADSOH
PLANNING • ENGINEERING • SURVEYING
SHM 3 OF 10 SHEM
' T
1 � �LA�O'•o' ■
REGISTERED LAND. SURVEY NO.
HEMMN COUNTY. E/BWESOTA
NO'W20'W 29500 —
[ scar ■ mu TRACT G
I.
TRACT B
TRACT C
TRACT D
TRACT E
-
-
g
TRACTS B, 0. AND DDD LIE BETWEEN ELEVA705 887.17
AM Baz87 FEET
g
TRACT C lES BETWEEN 887.17 AND aa1.17 FEET
}yi
TRACT D LIES BETWEEN 807.17 AND a7W.28 FEET
e
e
TRACTS E AND EEE 1E BETWEEN 887.17 AND 880.82 FEET
ye�08y
m
c
_
i
TRACT F IffS BETWEEN 887.17 AND 899.00 FEET
�a
4yyJ
TRACT H TES BETWEEN 887.17 AND 960.30 FEET
BEANNa SHOW AM BASED ON THE FAST E8!! v
' ^ m^
•
i
'
TRACT F w
°
LOT
AS, AUD. BUBO. NO. 172 HAS AN ASSUUE0 BEARING OF
e Oo']ON [
MIT
1T0.fF
7
_ 1 % \
// IAi
i F
NOOR020'W
TRACT G -- so 0 2o'E 169.e7
NORTHWEST
QUADRANT OF WEST 501H STREET MID FRIHfi AVENUE
T/• i� �{. ; p
p
_
SOUIFL El"ATION - 865.16 FEET (NGVD28)
d
WE
%�
�9
' +a .5 ;,aMn, ,
1
e�j E
1
1
a
7�.
m
�ACTIG �
b�
•+8�h�L�
�F
b4619
S020'20'E
SCHOELL MADSON I
PLANNING • ENGINEERING • SURVEYING
SHEET 4 OF 10 SHEETS
C"!
REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO.
HENNET9N COUNTY, MINNESOTA ,
—
NORO'20'W
293.00 —
�pp [
TRACT T
���
M � WAB
TRACT K
M [
ODW21r
1
r
-,41,,
�
'
TRACT P —.
\ s MOW [
$
TRACT I
TRACT L
TRACT N
aan -
1 9
.
§
I
TRACT 0
x mtrav •
-
§
I1
i
a
TRACE o
T —TRACT M I
��\
•dr
6 § W $
SOW2O'E 169.97
TRACT
T
R
JRMR
�'i \d I
TRACTS
I
/.
TRACTS 4 d M. T AND N LIE BETWEEN EEVA71ONS 88927
-
AND 89867 FEET
TRACTS NAND L LIE BETWEEN ELEVATIONS 681.17 AND
89887 FEET
TRACT N LIM BETWEEN 98.73 AND 89687 FEET
TRACTS 0. P. AND R IE BETWEEN 800.92 AND 89687 FEET
TRACTS O AND S lE BETININ 089.00 AND 89887 FEET
TRACT U TES BETWEEN BBO33 AND 89667 FEET
BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE EAST WE OF LOT AS.
AUD. SL®. NO. 173 HAS AN ASSUMED SEARING OF
SENCHMAM TOP NUT OF HYDRANT N NORTHWEST
QUADRANT OF WEST 60TH STREET AND FRANCE A"M
SOTDE MWA71ON _ 86i1S FEET (NCWD29)
SCHOELL MADSON I
PLANNING • ENGINEERING * SURVEYING
SHEET 5 OF 10 SHEETS
REGISTERED LAND SURVEY N0.
HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA
W
2 h
m to a
NO'20'20'W 28100
`i us ar • �, x aomav • �IAY TRACT AA
Y {{
E1 1 Lpp
S`' 51 °7o'A'tTe
OF aA
Wes•
1
9
TRACTS V. W. IC Y. L AA AND BB UE BET M
aO EIEVAMOS 88607 Alm 80617 FEET
TRACT V E . Alms. SM. a°172 HAS AN ASSUMED
BEARM OF NOOW20'W
W BENCHMARK TOP NUT OF HYDRANT DI NORTHWEST
§ QUADRANT OF WEST 30TH STRErT AND FRANCE
AVENUE SOUTH. ELEVATION - 86118 FEET
(NOVD2B)
.4• `
50'20'20'E 188.87 f \'� �+j1 �� \ aW maF�rm-mo•E 7 �_= YI .
WT Fro A01 TRACT Y 11 1
CWE TRACE % § TRACE
w'W _ C
/�tsY � I,\y - 1
b F7 g tl /
b 1P - .ai >u'W.
W E
TTTACTIAA . A 400 R
18.18 ®®
SOZO'2O'E
SCHOELL MADSON
PLANNING • ENGINEERING • SURVEYING
SHEET 8 OF 10 SHEETS
NO'20'2WV
N O[m]P ■
TRACT FF
(SEE DETAIL 9 B�yi
m
M OP1tlfC .
III ' s grsl'!c [ ttNl[W
Roos
WW20'E 189.97
BMW a
�4
fl N [<rA70 •
REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO.
HENNEPIN COUNTY. MWU30TA
29500
L1 '
/ 1
N .Ww
\l TRACT )
. r (SEE DETAIL a 2)
9
TRACT CC
a�
1
V� T
>6
? 1
W .i0t.
N WW[F1P • OLA a�j
�§ TRACT
OETAL 2
xm to vu[
Wm
W'M]R ■
w
8
z
- B OPIFTC [
TRACT Al
W
17
Ilk
m m o m
Tec+u D TttC )
TRACTS CC. DD. EE FF. GO, 101. 4 A4 AND KK LE
SETUMN CLEVA110M 900.17 AND 91X6! FEET
BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE
OF LOT 40. AID. SU®. N0. 172 HAS AN ASSBNED
BEARING OF NOO2C20'W
BENCHMARK- TOP NUT OF HYDRANT IN NORTHWEST
QUADRANT OF WEST 50TH STREET AND FRANCE
AVENUE SOUTH. ELEVATION . 885.18 FIST
(NOVO29)
SCHOELL MADSON I
PLANNING • ENGINEERING • SURVEYING
SHEET 7 W 10 SMM
-r= w
(SEE DETAIL 1)
x www •
N=IY20'W
8 902y7a F 1F
SOW= 169.07
rG` xmmTR.
/l,
` SM
,pyy DIZP]O'
REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO.
HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA
28300
4ti
r�YB
x amu2r • m.n
TRACT 2c 1AM )
TRACT LL
OETAL 2
x0T. s•,
1 1 \11
^• WNI tm�1'� \� N
? AA T
N Al>
MR��F
xw / x wu�v
\
Z
8
1NACi im
s T02Sm e
'i $
TR11CT SS
8819
SOW2O'E
I•
TRACTS I.L. 1DL NN. 00, M O0. M SS. AND TT
LW BEIWSN El"ATIONS 919M AND MST FEET
BEARINGS SNOWN ARE BASED ON DIE EAST LRlE
OF EDT NS. AND, SU93 N0. 172 HAS AN ASSUM
REARM OF N007C20'W
BFNCWARIO Tip NUT OF HYDRANT IN NORTHWEST
OUAORANT OF VEST DOT" STREET AND FRANCE
AVEME SO M. ELEVATION - 88318 FEET
(NOW29)
SCHOELL MADSON
PLANNING • ENGINEERING • SURVEYING
%W 8 OF 10 SKEM
x amu2r • m.n
OETAL 2
x0T. s•,
MR��F
xw / x wu�v
\
Z
8
1NACi im
s T02Sm e
'i $
TR11CT SS
8819
SOW2O'E
I•
TRACTS I.L. 1DL NN. 00, M O0. M SS. AND TT
LW BEIWSN El"ATIONS 919M AND MST FEET
BEARINGS SNOWN ARE BASED ON DIE EAST LRlE
OF EDT NS. AND, SU93 N0. 172 HAS AN ASSUM
REARM OF N007C20'W
BFNCWARIO Tip NUT OF HYDRANT IN NORTHWEST
OUAORANT OF VEST DOT" STREET AND FRANCE
AVEME SO M. ELEVATION - 88318 FEET
(NOW29)
SCHOELL MADSON
PLANNING • ENGINEERING • SURVEYING
%W 8 OF 10 SKEM
NO'20'20'W
a
TRACE lOQ \
1
3oil�' xmwT
` -TRAer "X I
W b
(SEE DETAIL 1) s
M ORTwx
1�a
+d�
f� M W07P}T
rETALL 1
. rani
I
ne
SO7W20'E 169.97
REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO.
IMMEM CONY, NIMIESOTA
I
x •92PID' . m.n
29300
—
TRACE BBB wwW-n W -C H
U47 /IV Wa
i s x My.c [
i
`V IANW,12r•I
\
�xamm'm'aI
T
1xmmTU'x 1
xavm`m'
4
TRACT
c �7,W"I
TRACTS A1. W. Rq 10L YY. 27. AAA. BBB, AND
8
CCC EE ABOW BFYAIIW 9 0.67
TRACT UU
BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED ON RE EAST LINE
W EAT M'. ARD. 9180. N0. 172 HAS AN ASSUMED
-
HFAPNO OF NODW2"
BENONARW: TOP NUT OF HYDRANT IN NORTHWEST
8
QUADRANT OF WEST 90TH SKEET AND TRANCE
AVEMIE SOUTH. ELEYATM . 118116 FEET
r
§ §!
(NOVD29)
j
\ I \\ Al
Jig j_]. : 9Eg
TRACT AAA
.3F
?
vau
� • �
•oww
A TRMCT BBB
?
c
.a y�
rq�zy,
7
alb
IB19
SO2C20'E
x •92PID' . m.n
a�
C§ wim W
DETALL 2
x M =Ut
SCHOELL MADSON I
PLANNING • ENGINEERING • SURVEYING
SHEET 9 OF 10 SHEETS
REGISTERED LAND SaURVEY' NO
4- : HENNEPIN COUM. JAMNESOTA
•i
. .. ..
TRACT UU TRACT W
.TIIACT RN
TRACT 70( TRACT W TRACE II
7RACT'AM TRACT BBB ,
„ iRACTCCC
MT . pBIf
A3— RAT
-..
TRACT LL
TRACT IRE
TRACT NN
TRACT 00
TRACT PP
TRACT W
1RACi RR
7RA7 4
TRACT TT ..
- .
riU 'M LL
-
_ -:
TRACT IX,' -
TRACT DD
TRACT FE
•TRACT FF-
TRACT GO
'TRACT NH
- TRACT�1
TRACT AI
"TRACT KK1:'
.. -
. ..
TRACT v
TRACT W
TRACT %
TRACT Y
TRACT Z
TRACT M
-
TRACT BB
R[T
`1
ROM
\
)
e
c
TRACT G .TRACT $
9
TRACT N
TRACT U
_
.
... TRT. eeAn•
�•
F
• RM =17
1
ne - --
__ A
------------
-
CR.A, R37.
N�RT
__
TRACT "G''
A
�pT�
p,
GS
_G�
TRACT
.'
1RACT.C,
TRACT H
�� �
-
1
..
- .. .:•
TRACT.'A
TRACT
G0T'
Niai . id1
' MV. iTm
Wo
A
.
TRACT A
_ACT
ELEVATION .-MEW
NO SCALE
BETNONARK 70P NUT OF HYDRANT LGCATm AT SOl1THFA5T'.:
-
- ..
CORNER OF W7FRSECRON OF 10TH AVFMIE .0. A. FAST
2M STRM. EILVADON -' B IR FEET (LO.BO. 1020)
� SCHOELL MADSON ,
-
- "-
PLMNING ENGINEMING !: SURVEYING . -
V - T"
tk i 111
"XID.
io Alf
1,
0
I......1 - 3 �- - ■.......■ - ■...... ■........
'R OA i.-
•. : :�■ mills, - _ ■!11■ •.::1�1�� I::::It it :1 =��1�1::: 1111x1 - 111111
1...1... 111111/1 I�I11.11 ........■ _...... �.....+� - ■......... .. .1II IIUI 11111111
..: ■■ ■11' ='11' - ::u:1�1__�1:::1�'1 :1� 1.1::::= .11�■ -•11•
....�� =
all: mmi = ::I•.:1��1` 3�...:: 1:....� 1�M11 ;:: ��1111� ! soon
�1
-.1Ii.=
- 7. 6 ..10 ..1 y
■■
_=
■ ■ ■__
57. ......1 -= ■ ■ ■-
on
11
- I■ N _ ■ ■■
11
—■
. — ._11111111
�
11 11Ittt11:'.■
ee H 11.'
11
■■
.. Y..
WE
■N..�
W Illnnl'`�
.. .11. 9 ° ■III. e::l ■ ■.1;. ..
nnuV
-11 :2
PH!, i
IW
aid
Z
2P iv
... .. ..
54 1111
� OPUS. II
■lilm0�SI
041Eanww- EENYEIiIEVa ��
L _
Is OPUS.
s�
..ft.�
83 0—P, US.
eons AND
FRANCE
REDEVELOPMENT
E" Mb—b
�d
FLOOR PLAN
LOWER LEVEL
.I
L
c aaatww•iwo .
c OPUS.
s�
it mi �r� err
r
A OPUS.
60TH AND
FRANCE
REDEVELOPMENT
tsr. r..re
FLOOR PLAN
LEVEL TWO
J
L
EAST ELEVATWN- FRANCE AVENUE t . it
2 NORTH ELEVATION • W. 50TH
12. _ t
J
J
W
RESIDENTIAL
J
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
� w
,��«,
.,
L
RETAIL
PARKING
FRANCE
AVENUE
PC 1/31/07
S -07 -1 Preliminary Plat
Haugland Company
5000 France Avenue
Mr. Teague presented his staff report recommeridil
give preliminary approval to the RLS, dated Noverribar 13
plat approval within one year of preliminary approval or re
application requesting a time extension or the preliminary
Mr. Haugland was present to respond to-
questions-Commissioner Staunton questioned if this project rE
Development Plan approval for site redevelopment. Mr`T
project received Final Development Plan and Conditional
couple years ago. Continuing, Mr. it �aguo said the propo
replat to accommodate the new-dondo,units/and` retail,Ispa
Mr. Haugland 5229 VV,�st Highwood Drive, Edina-a(
Commission and explaine4 the roplating facilitates individt
and retail space. \
Corr"imission Fischer stated it appears to him that this request is a
technicality and moved to )recommend preliminary plat approval subject to final
plat approval within one year bf preliminary approval. Commissioner Staunton
seconded'the motion. All voted ,,Iaye; motion carried.
j
]-that the City Counci
2006 subject to final,,'
eipt of a wrktten \'
iproval will \be -void.
rom the- Commission.
ceived Final
;ague responded the
Ise�ermit approval a
ed subdivision is a
essed the
ownership of units
Aar
I
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
TO: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item: III. D.
From: Joyce Repya Consent ❑
Associate Planner Information Only ❑
Date: February 20, 2007 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
® To Council
Subject: Action: ❑ Motion
2007 Community Block Grant ® Resolution
Program. ❑ Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Recommendation:
1. Approve recommended 2007 CDBG budget for submission to Hennepin
County.
2. Approve reprogramming balance of daycare subsidy funds from
Greater Minneapolis Daycare Association (GMDCA) to Jewish
Vocational Services (JVS).
INFO/BACKGROUND:
1. 2007 CDBG Budget:
The CDBG Community Development Block Grant Program is a
federal entitlement program administered by HUD who charges Hennepin
County to oversee the distribution of funds to its communities. These funds
are to be directed toward improving housing opportunities and providing a
suitable living environment for persons with low and moderate incomes.
Each city's planning allocation is determined by a HUD formula based on
the city's share of the 2000 census (updated to 2004); the number of
persons at or below poverty level; and overcrowded housing units.
Hennepin County expects their 2007 allocation to be the same as 2006, thus
they have instructed the cities to use the same allotment total when preparing their
proposed budget. Again, Edina will have $167,594 to go toward public services as well
as community development projects.
Public Services
Funding for public services may not exceed 15% of the total budget. Edina's
2007 allotment for public services may not exceed $25,139. The Human Rights and
Relations Commission (HRRC) has reviewed the requests for funding from the following
agencies and has recommended that the proposed budget remain unchanged from
2006.
• Jewish Vocational Services (JVS) — providing daycare subsidies to
income eligible families;
Senior Community Services (H.O.M.E. — Housing and Outdoor
Maintenance for the Elderly) — providing housekeeping and chore
services to Edina seniors who pay for services on a sliding fee scale;
Community Action Partnership for Suburban Hennepin (CAPSH) —
provides housing programs for low and moderate income homeowners
and homebuyers; and
HOME Line — provides tenant advocacy services for Edina renters.
Community Development
After the $25,139 distribution for public services, $142,455 remains to be
directed toward community development projects. Staff recommends to again fund the
Rehabilitation of Private Property and Scattered Site Affordable Housing programs.
These two housing programs have successfully contributed to not only maintaining
Edina's housing stock, but also providing affordable housing opportunities for Edina
residents.
The Rehabilitation of Private Property program provides deferred repayment
loans of up to $30,000 to make structural improvements to owner occupied single-
family homes. Eligibility for the program is based on a household income schedule
established by HUD for the Minneapolis /St. Paul area. The income limits may not
exceed 80% of the median household income. There are currently four homeowners
participating in the program- Staff anticipates that the program will continue to attract
income eligible homeowners interested in improving and maintaining their homes.
The Scattered Site Affordable Housing funds are proposed to be directed toward
assisting developers and non- profit organizations in the creation of affordable housing
opportunities.
Staff recommends the following distribution of 2007 CDBG funds for community
development purposes:
2006
2007
2007
BUDGET
REQUEST
PROPOSED
JVS - Daycare
$ 8,137
$ 9,500
$ 8,137
H.O.M.E.
$ 9,440
$ 9,440
$ 9,440
C.A.P.S.H.
$ 5,086
$ 4,000
$ 5,086
HomeLine
$ 2,476
$ 4,500
$ 2,476
TOTAL
$25,139
$ 27,440
$25,139
Community Development
After the $25,139 distribution for public services, $142,455 remains to be
directed toward community development projects. Staff recommends to again fund the
Rehabilitation of Private Property and Scattered Site Affordable Housing programs.
These two housing programs have successfully contributed to not only maintaining
Edina's housing stock, but also providing affordable housing opportunities for Edina
residents.
The Rehabilitation of Private Property program provides deferred repayment
loans of up to $30,000 to make structural improvements to owner occupied single-
family homes. Eligibility for the program is based on a household income schedule
established by HUD for the Minneapolis /St. Paul area. The income limits may not
exceed 80% of the median household income. There are currently four homeowners
participating in the program- Staff anticipates that the program will continue to attract
income eligible homeowners interested in improving and maintaining their homes.
The Scattered Site Affordable Housing funds are proposed to be directed toward
assisting developers and non- profit organizations in the creation of affordable housing
opportunities.
Staff recommends the following distribution of 2007 CDBG funds for community
development purposes:
2006 2007
.► Activity Budget Proposal
Rehabilitation of Private Property $ 62,455 $ 62,455
Scattered Site Affordable Housing $ 80,000 $ 80,000
TOTAL $142,455 $142,455
2. Reprogramming Daycare Subsidy Funds:
In late 2006, GMDCA lost the contract to oversee the sliding fee child care
assistance program. Currently, $27,013.32 remains in Edina's daycare assistance
budget from previous years. Hennepin County has chosen JVS to administer their child
care assistance program and has asked participating cities to authorize them to
redistribute the remaining daycare funds from GMDCA to JVS. The Human Rights and
Relations Commission supports the reprogramming of funds to JVS. The
accompanying resolution will facilitate the reprogramming of the remaining funds.
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-27
RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPOSED USE OF 2007 URBAN
HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
GRANT PROGRAM FUNDS ANDAUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF SUBRECIPIENT AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN
COUNTY AND ANY THIRD PARTY AGREEMENTS
City of Edina
WHEREAS, the City of Edina, through execution of a Joint Cooperation Agreement with
Hennepin County, is cooperating in the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block
Grant Program; and
WHEREAS, the City of Edina has developed a proposal for the use of 2007 Urban Hennepin
County Community Development Block Grant funds made available to it; and
WHEREAS, the city held a public hearing on February 20, 2007 to obtain the views of citizens
on housing and community development needs and priorities and the City's proposed use of
$167,594 from the 2007 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant.
BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Edina approves the following projects
for funding from the 2007 Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program
and authorizes submittal of the proposal to Hennepin County.
Actjyfty Bud &et
Rehabilitation of Private Property $ 62,455
Scattered Site Affordable Housing $ 80,000
JVS - Child Daycare $ 8,137
Senior Community Services (HOME) $ 9,440
Community Action for Suburban Hennepin (CASH) $ 5,086
HOME Line $ 2,476
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor
and its _City Manager to execute the Subrecipient Agreement and any required Third Party
Agreement on behalf of the City to implement the 2007 Community Development Block Grant
Program.
Dated: February 20, 2007
Attest:
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS
CITY OF EDINA )
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
James B. Hovland, Mayor
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and
foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 20, 2007 and as
recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this ___ day of , 20__.
City Hall
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394
www.cityofedina.com
CitMeQ7 -8861
FAX 952 - 826 -0390
TTY 952 - 826 -0379
+1
t__1
January 12, 2007
Ms. Joyce Repya, Associate Planner
City of Edina
4801 West 501h Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
Dear Ms. Repya:
JVS, a division of Jewish Family and Children's Service (JFCS) of Minneapolis, is
pleased to submit this request for $9,500 in 2007 Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) funding. JVS will utilize these funds to help low- and moderate -
income Edina residents access quality child care programs.
As the new entity administering Hennepin County's Basic Sliding Fee Child Care
Assistance Program, JVS serves eligible parents who are working or going to school
to improve their employment outlook. Having access to quality child care programs
for their children is vital to these parents' productivity and piece of mind while they
strive toward self - sufficiency. However, due to the high amount of need, there is a
waiting list of 12 to 24 months until eligible parents can access these services. CDBG
funding will help bridge this gap in services for the residents in your community.
JVS is also aware that a balance of $27,013.32 was previously unspent for this
program. Therefore, JVS is requesting that the City of Edina reallocate the existing
CDBG funds designated for child care assistance to JVS in addition to $9,500 in 2007
CDBG funding. Together, this funding will help bridge the child care assistance
needs of your community's residents through December 2008.
Thank you for your interest and consideration. JVS is interested in partnering with
the City of Edina to better serve community members in need. I would be happy to
answer any questions you may have. Please contact me at 952- 417 -2130 or
swallace@ivsmn.org. Otherwise, I plan on being at your public hearing on February
201h to answer any questions that may arise.
Sincerely,
Sue Wallace, Grants Coordinator
J11S is a division of Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis
Affiliate of IAJVS, Accredited by CARF, the Rehabilitation Accreditation Commission
JVS
13100 WAYZATA BLVD.
SUITE 300
MINNETONKA, MN 55305
phone 952- 591 -0300
fax 952 -591 -0227
e -mail jvs @jvsmn.org
web www.jvsmn.org
430 FIRST AVE. NORTH
SUITE 620
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
phone 612- 692 -8920
fax 612- 692 -8921
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Judy Halper
JVS DIVISION DIRECTOR
Larry S. Greenbaum
JVS ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
Carla Richert
FAMILY SERVICE DIVISION
DIRECTOR
Mari Forbush
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OFFICERS
Jeff Mirviss, President'
Debra Orbuch Grayson,
Vice President'
Howard Held, Vice President'
Stacie Nabedrick,
Vice President'
Richard Proman,
Vice President'
Mark Stipakov, Vice President'
Jill Ann Marks, Secretary/
President - Elect'
IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENTS
Etta Barry'
Terri Gordon'
DIRECTORS
Margo Abelson
Kerry Bader
Marilyn Broms
Genya Buslovich
Karen Davidman
Rabbi Alexander Davis
Bob Edelstein
Tamar Fenton
Judy Goviser
Roni Gingold
Raleigh Johnson
Robert Kelen'
Robert Kramer
Robin Landy
Laura Leventhal
Marc Meirovitz'
Ann Miller
David Nirenstein
Larry Pepper
Jim Rhodes
Jason Rose
Karen Rubin
Adeel Saad
Thomas Segal
Suzanne Singer
Marty Stillman
Jeff Swartz
Jim Tankenoff
Howard Tarkow
Alan Ziskin
Executive Committee
2007
URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM
REQUEST FOR FUNDING tellable form)
(Use one form per project)
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. City: Edina
2. Project Name: Community Child Care Assistance Funds
3. Contact Person/ Phone No. Sue Wallace / 952 -417 -2130
B. PROJECT DATA
1. CDBG Funding Requested $ 9,500
(needs to be same as council resolution)
2. Is this ar existing CDBG - funded project? ®Yes ❑No
3. Project Location: Services will be available to residents throughout the City of
Edina from the following JVS locations:
• 13100 Wayzata Blvd, Suite 300, Minnetonka, MN 55305
• 430 1st Ave N, Suite 620, Minneapolis, MN 55401
4. Project Description: (Describe the project in as much detail as possible, including the
local need(s) the project will address.)
JVS is requesting CDBG funding from nine communities, including Edina, to
participate in the Community Child Care Assistance Funds program. This
program_ will help bridge a gap in services for those residents who are
eligible for Hennepin County's child care assistance program, but who are
on a 12 -24 month waiting list for services. JVS is requesting $9,500 to serve
eligible Edina families. Specifically, JVS will:
•
Contact and assess Edina parents on Hennepin County's waiting list and
those who are referred, or self- refer, to the agency for child care
assistance
Verify that families have incomes eligible for the Basic Sliding Fee
program (starting at or below 175% of federal poverty guidelines or
approximately 73% of HUD low- income guidelines)
Confirm parent(s) is /are in eligible activities, including: working, job
searching, and /or going to school to improve their employment outlook
Determine the maximum amount of care to be authorized based on
schedule
1
• Ensure child care providers are registered with Hennepin County or
facilitate the registration process
• Facilitate monthly (or bi- monthly) child care subsidy payments to
providers for up to 50% of the cost of authorized care
JVS leverages funding from Hennepin County for efficient and effective
administration of child care assistance programs including Hennepin
County's Basic Sliding Fee Program (BSF) and the Minneapolis Community
and Technical College Child Care Assistance Fund. Child Care Assistance
case managers are able assist with a smooth transition to the Hennepin
County program and refer parents to additional internal or external
resources as appropriate.
JVS offices, both in Minneapolis and in Minnetonka, are conveniently located
and very accessible via public transportation. In addition, program
participants and their child care providers may access services via phone, .
fax, mail, or email to facilitate program services.
This child care assistance program aligns with the goals and priorities set
forth for the CDBG program and the Hennepin County Five -Year Plan (2005-
2009).
5. Consolidated Plan Priorities: Using the Priority Summary chart below, identify what
priority(ies) the project will meet. (Note: If a proposed project is a low urban county
priority, you must explain why it has a higher priority in your community.)
. Priorities
-Use X to indicate
Rental Housing
Existing Housing Rehabilitation
First Time Homeownership
Homelessness
Special Needs Housing
Public Service
X
Neighborhood Revitalization
Transportation Services
6. Describe anticipated results /accomplishments the project will have. (number of
persons to receive services, number of affordable housing units to be rehabilitated or
built, etc.)
This program will provide up to 50% of the monthly child care costs for
eligible families. This funding will help alleviate the problem of families
choosing between inadequate child care, forgoing other expenses such as
2
rent and food, or quitting work and /or school. By forgoing rent and food,
they put their family's health and safety in jeopardy. By quitting work and
school, parents lose the opportunities to financially provide for their families
and force them into, or back into, dependence on welfare.
Based on our research, JVS estimates that up to 10 Edina families will be
able to be served with these funds through December 2008.
7. Implementation Schedule: (Identify major project tasks to occur during/ within the
first 12 months of the 18 month expenditure period. Expenditure period begins July 1,
2007 and ends December 31, 2008.)
Task: Outreach and verification of eligibility Date July 2007 - ongoing
Task: Ongoing case management Date July 2007 - ongoing
Task: Payments to providers Date July 2007 - ongoing
Task: Final billing for 2007 funds Date December 2008
8. Budget: (Specify total project budget by major funding sources. Attach additional
listings where appropriate.)
FUNDING SOURCES
AMOUNT
CDBG
$ 9,500.00
Prior Year CDBG Funding (for this project)
$27,013.32
Other Federal Funds (specify)
$
Low Income Housing Tax Credits
$
State (specify)
$
Municipal
$
Metropolitan Council
$
Private (specify)
$
Other (specify)
$
Project Total
$36,513.32
NOTE: This project leverages approximately $6 million from Hennepin
County and $75,000 from Minneapolis Community and Technical College.
SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES
10709 Wayzata Blvd., Suite 111, Minnetonka, MN 55305 -1529
0 Phone: (952) 541 -1019 FAX: (952) 54-1-0841
Website: www.seniorcommunity.org
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
David F. Fisher February 15, 2007
President
Sharon Burnham
1st Vice President
Ms Joyce Repya, City Planner
Marvin Johnson
City of Edina
2nd Vice President
4801 West 50'' Street
John Lawson
Treasurer
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
Cheryl Fischer
Secretary
Dear Ms. Repya:
Gloria Johnson
Member -at -Large
Senior Community Services is requesting that the City of Edina
James Crist
allocate $9,440 from it's share of 2006 Community Development
Member -at -Large
Block Grant (CDBG) funds to support the HOME Program. This is
John Gray
the same level of funding provided in the current year. Enclosed is a
Marty Guritz
Hennepin County Request for Funding application filled out to
Bonnie Hammel
facilitate our request.
Sandy Hewitt
Aiko Higuchi
Mike Holtz
Edina's CDBG funds will be leveraged from client fees, the United
Ron Klecker
Way, the Metropolitan Area Agency on Aging (MA.AA) and
Laurie Lafontaine
Hennepin County. Friends of HOME, an organization that solicits
Woody Love
contributions from individuals, businesses, civic groups and
Jeanette Metz
churches provides support as well.
Dr. Chinyere (Ike) Njaka
Senator Gen Olson
Sincerely,
Keith Stuessi
Eugene Winstead
Benjamin F. Withhart
Executive Director & C.E.O.
Ron Bloch
Program Administrator
PROGRAMS
• Supporting Positive Aging
• Transportation
• Community Senior Centers
• Caregiver Support Services
• Senior Outreach
• Frail Elder Support Services
• H.O.M.E.
• Senior Outreach
A Founding Member of
Eldercare Partners
ID.
A United Way Agency
2007
CITY OF EDINA CDBG PROGRAM
REQUEST FOR FUNDING
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Community: Edina
2. Project Name: HOME (Household & Outside Maintenance for Elderly)
3. Contact Person/Phone Number /email Ron Bloch/(952) 541 -1019/
r.bloch@seniorcommunity.org
B. PROJECT DATA
1. Funding Request $9,440
2. Is this request to fund an existing CDBG - FUNDED project? X Yes No
3. Leveraged Funds: (What other public or private funds does this project include? If none,
then please note none).
Amount $ –See #10_ Source—See #10
Amount $ Source
Amount $ Source
4. Project Location: Address Citywide_X
5. Project Description: See attached Program Summary
6. Consolidated Plan Priorities: (Please see enclosed sheet to identify what priorities the
project will meet):
Project will address Public Services – Senior Services – High Priority
7. Anticipated results /accomplishments projects will have. (i.e.; number of
persons/households to be assisted/served, number of housing units to be
rehabilitated/built, etc.)
In 2006 the project served 140 Edina residents (122 households) providing a total
of 1,455 jobs /projects. It is anticipated that approximately the same number of
residents will be served in 2007.
8. If applicable, describe how project will assist community in achieving Metropolitan
Livable Communities Act goals.
9. Implementation Schedule: (Identify major project tasks to occur and date anticipated)
On -going delivery of project services including Maintenance
(minor carpentry, plumbing, electrical repairs and interior /exterior painting),
Chore Services (lawn mowing & snow shoveling), and Homemaking
(cleaning, vacuuming, dusting, washing clothes, window cleaning).
10. Budget: (Specify total project budget by major project component, i.e., administration,
planning, construction, acquisition, direct grants, public service.)
COMPONENT
BUDGET /SOURCE OF FUNDS
CDBG Funds
Other Funds (Identify)
Public Service/Brooklyn Center
$18,135
$231,000 Client fees
Public Service/Eden Prairie
$ 8,000
$ 93,707 United Way
Public Service/Edina
$ 9,440
$ 16,560 Edina EEHF
Public Service/Minnetonka
$14,900
$ 77,123 MAAA
Public Service/Richfield
$14,940
$ 77,900 Hennepin County
Public Service/Bloomington
$20,000
$ 22,700 Bloomington HRA
$
$ 12,000 Donations
$85,415
$530,990
HOME PROGRAM
EDINA 2005/2006 CDBG Year Expenses and Revenues
Client
Edina
Month
Total Expense
Contributions
Other Revenue
CDBG
Running Deficit
July
3,730
2,070
1,387
273
-
August
6,946
2,054
2,817
2,075
-
September
4,987
.1,923
2,606
458
-
October
6,005
2,392
2,805
808
-
November
5,421
1,550
3,508
363
-
December
4,911
1,810
1,483
1,618
-
January
5,883
1,881
3,315
687
-
February
4,400
399
2,547
1,454
-
March
7,152
1,747
2,857
1,544
(1,004)
April
5,627
2,233
2,685
-
(1,713)
May
5,735
1,658
2,966
-
(2,824)
June
6,531
2,770
3,069
-
(3,516)
TOTAL
67,328
22,487
32,045
9,280
3,516
Other Revenue includes EEHF
Metro olitan Area Agency on Aging funds and
Friends of HOME contributions
2006 EDINA HOME Program Activity Summary
Maintenance
/Chore
Homemaker
Total
Month
# Households
#Service Hours
# Households
#Service Hours
#Service Hours
January
10
27
52
185.25
212.25
February
3
27
43
147.75
174.75
March
6
111.5
48
194.5
306.00
April
5
18
47
179.5
197.50
May
20
89
48
197.5
286.50
June
41
443.5
46
159.75
603.25
July
20
84.75
49
179.5
264.25
August
18
53
46
177.25
230.25
September
23
68.75
45
171.5
240.25
October
38
315.25
43
182.75
498.00
November
15
180.75
46
199.75
380.50
December
5
46.5
39
167
213.50
TOTAL
1,465.00
2,142.00
3,607.00
Attachment
H.O.M.E.
(Household & Outside Maintenance for Elderly)
Program Summary
SUMMARY PARAGRAPH — The H.O.M.E. Program is a homemaker, maintenance and chore
services program designed as a cost- effective alternative to rising costs of long term care for the
elderly. It currently operates in the cities of Bloomington, Brooklyn Center, Crystal, Eden
Prairie, Edina, Golden Valley, Hopkins, Minnetonka, New Hope, Plymouth, Richfield,
Robbinsdale and St. Louis Park. The Program maintains a core staff of trained individuals to
assure prompt, quality services and a skills bank component. Clients are asked to pay for services
based on ability (sliding fee scale).
TARGET POPULATION — Consumers of H.O.M.E. services are residents age 60+ or people
with disabilities who live independently and need some affordable in -home services in order to
maintain their residence. The Program serves clients who need assistance but are not financially
able to afford the full cost of the service as well as frail older adults who require services
designed to meet their needs.
SERVICES — The philosophy of the H.O.M.E. Program is to help maintain independence for
elders and avoid premature nursing home placement by providing homemaker, maintenance and
chore services. Clients are asked to pay based on a sliding -fee scale. Homemaker services
include housecleaning, food preparation, grocery shopping, doing laundry and window washing.
Assessments are made and services provided according to the specific needs of each client for
type of service, time and frequency. Chore/home maintenance services include snow removal,
lawn care, installation of security features, carpentry, minor plumbing, interior /exterior painting,_
weatherization, minor roof repair and other jobs needed to enable elderly residents to remain in
their homes, as well as maintaining their homes in an accordance with community standards.
STAFF — Home maintenance and homemaker services are provided by workers who are trained
in the techniques of working with elders. Skills Bank Workers (independent contractors) are also
utilized to provide chore services. Staff, reports to a Program Director, who is responsible for
their supervision and daily Program operation. Other staff and volunteers provide administrative
and clerical support.
FACILITY — Services are delivered in the homes of elderly residents. Program offices are
located at Creekside Community Center, 9801 Penn Ave. South, Bloomington and 730 Florida
Ave. South, Golden Valley. A satellite office is located at the Minnetonka Senior Center.
PLACEMENT PROCEDURE — .Clients gain access to the Program either directly by contacting
the H.O.M.E. office or by referral from an area agency.
FUNDING SOURCES — Revenues are derived from client fees, a service contract with Hennepin
County for clients with very low incomes, the Metropolitan Area Agency on Aging (MAAA) in
support of chore services, cities in which the Program operates, the United Way, and
contributions from clients and Friends of HOME, an organization,that solicits donations from
businesses, churches and community groups.
HOME'
3455 Bloomington Ave
Minneapolis, MN 55407
Ms..Susan Sheiberg
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Ms. Sheiberg:
Office Phone: 6121728 -5770
Hotline: 612/728 -5767
Fax: 612!728 -5761
www.homelinemn.org
January 12, 2007
This letter is to request funding in the amount of $4,500 from the City of Edina's Community
Development Block Grant Program to support HOME Line's services for renters. We appreciate the
support from the City of Edina's CDBG program last year.
HOME Line's tenant hotline receives dozens of Calls each year from Edina residents. Since we
started up the hotline we have received 1,259 calls from Edina renters, about 1.5% of the total
number of calls to our hotline. In addition, our award - winning high school presentations (on becoming
a successful first -time renter) have been given eleven times to Edina High School and Southview
Middle School and Valley View Middle School, reaching 447 students.
. it the coming year, we anticipate that 90 -100 Edina households will be helped via our tenant hotline
and we will help prevent 2 -3 families from being evicted through the assistance of our Court Advocacy
Program (part of Hennepin county's Family Homeless Prevention and Assistance Program). In
addition, we expect to assist Edina renters in recovering $2,000 -3,000 in returned security deposits or
rent abatements for substandard conditions.
I am enclosing a one -page sheet summarizing our hotline's service to Edina residents and a two -page
description of the programs HOME Line offers.
We appreciate the opportunity to submit this application. If you have any questions or need additional
information, please call Mike Vraa, our managing attorney, at 612%728 -5770 x113.
Sincerely,
S�
Beth, Kodluboy
Executive Director
enclosures as noted
Tenant Advocacy in Minnesota
Summary of HOME Line's Tenant Services Proposal
Renters make up nearly 4,924 households in Edina, and many of these families
have low incomes. When renters have problems involving their homes, those
who don't know their rights and responsibilities can end up living in housing that
is unsafe, lose money that is rightfully theirs, or make decisions that cost them
their home. HOME Line provides renters with the tools necessary to keep their
homes safe and affordable.
HOME Line will provide three distinct, but related, programs as part of this grant:
a tenant hotline that provides free legal advice to tenants about landlordttenant
law, a high school educational program, and our new immigrant outreach
program that provides services to new immigrants. These services prevent
problems ranging from homelessness to illness from unsafe living conditions, and
result in reducing the use of the city's emergency resources.
While our services are available to all renters free of charge, over 88% of our
callers are low or very -low income; almost three quarters (75 %) of these callers
are women; 16% are racial minorities. Our programs are aimed at low income
renters, high school students who are about to enter the rental market, and
recent immigrants.
Tenant Hotline
The first of these programs is HOME Line's tenant hotline. The hotline began in
1992 as a service to Suburban Hennepin County residents. Today, we serve the
entire state (excluding Minneapolis and St. Paul) and have recently taken our
87,000th call. Three staff attorneys work full time on the hotline along with 40 -60
law student volunteers each year. Edina has accounted for 1,389 calls since
1992. Our tenant services to Edina have helped save tenants at least $ 31,000.
The most common reasons Edina residents call our hotline are; repairs,
evictions, security deposits, questions about how proper notice to vacate is given,
and break lease questions. The need for this service in Edina is apparent --
Edina residents already rely on this valuable service.
High School Renter Education Program
The second program is our high school presentation program. To date, we have
spoken to 660 classes (over 17,000 students) throughout the metro area. This
presentation has awards from both Best Prep and B.E.E.F. (Business Economic
Education Foundation). It focuses on the things that future renters should know,
including how to avoid evictions, how to select roommates, security deposits and
understanding leases.
Immigrant Outreach Project
HOME Line Renters' "Hotline"
Edina
Information on calls during the period 1/1/92 through 11/30/2006
.. Over the past fifteen years a total of 1,389
Edina renters have contacted HOME Line.
This represents service to approximately
3,472 residents when all family members
have been counted.
The vast majority (over 88 %) of Edina. callers
to HOME Line are "low" or "very-low"
income. These income categories are those
used by the U.S. Department of H.0 D.:
Very Low: incomes below 50% of the metro median
Low: incomes between 50% and 80% of the metro
median
Moderate: incomes above 80% of the metro median.
Renter's Education
HOME Line's High School Renter's
Program provides advice on tenant rights and
responsibilities. This free presentation covers
most things that first time renters are likely to
encounter, including roommate problems,
evictions, security deposits and repair
problems.
In the last fourteen years, HOME Line has
been to Edina High School three times,
speaking to 57 students. We have also been
to Southview Middle School for two classes,
speaking to 60 students and Valley View
Middle School 6 times, speaking to 330
students.
HOME Line has also sent speakers to many
property manager's meetings, continuing
legal education seminars and trainings for
various shelters /resource centers.
Number of Calls Per Year
127 129
150 tU1 118 98 96 93 105 94
100 J. 63 74 77 76 67 71
50
92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06
Callers' Income 1992 -2006
Low
Very 30%
Low
Mod.
12%
HOME Line has helped prevent 43 evictions
in Edina in the last fifteen years. HOME Line
has also helped Edina residents recover
money from their landlords; $14,111 back
from improperly withheld security deposits
and $17,019 in rent abatements (refunds for
substandard conditions).
The Hotline receives approximately 9,000
calls per year. Careful records are taken for
each call, including the reason the tenant
called. These are the top ten topics in Edina
over the last fifteen years (followed by the
number of calls):
1.
Repairs
241
2.
Security Deposits
169
3.
Evictions
147
4.
Notice to Vacate
142
5.
Break Lease
138
6.
Lease Questions
78
7.
Privacy/Intrusion
53
7.
Rent Increase
53
9.
Fees
44
10.
Heat
35.
The third program focuses on immigrant outreach efforts. According to the 2000
census, foreign born people make up at least 2,874 or 6% of the Edina
population (a number which will surely continue to grow). Recognizing that many
recent immigrants are not sure where to find a variety of useful resources, HOME
Line has begun working to bridge this gap. An example of how this program
works illustrates how we will implement it in Edina:
The African - Assistance Program is a Brooklyn Park based agency that. works on
issues affecting recent immigrants from Africa (their criteria for helping someone,
is that they moved to the U.S. in the last seven years). We sent a staff attorney.
to conduct a three hour training. at their office.. In attendance were staff from the
African - Assistance Program along with volunteers that frequently work in their
office. The three hour session is designed to give a broad overview to the key
concepts of landlord tenant law in Minnesota. Now, when a client of their
program approaches them with a problem concerning their tenancy, they are put
in contact with the specific attorney who spoke at their office. If the client.needs
to fax in documents or needs a translator, the African- Assistance Program tries to .
provide this help. The goal of this program is to have the social service agency
serve as a conduit between the recent immigrant with a tenant problem and: our
office.
By offering free tenant hotline services and free high school renter education
programs for high school students, HOME Line has been providing needed,
services for those most vulnerable. Many recent immigrant groups live and work
in Edina and many of them are living in rental housing with lower incomes and
have no knowledge of their rental rights. It is important that we train and work
with those social service providers who have contact with these new residents,
so they too can use the tenant services to solve their rental problems.
2007
URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM
REQUEST FOR FUNDING alllable form)
(Use one form per project)
A. GENERAL INFORMATION
1. City: Edina
2. Project Name: Community Action Partnership of Suburban Hennepin " CAPSH" — Full
Cycle Homeownership Program.
Contact Person/ Phone No. Marcy Harris: Director of Planning and Development.
(952) 933 -9639 Ext. 225; mharris @capsh.org
B. PROJECT DATA
CDBG Funding Requested $ 4,000
(needs to be same as council resolution)
2. Is this an existing CDBG - funded project? ®Yes ❑No
4. Project Location: The City of Edina and the rest of suburban Hennepin County
Project Description: (Describe the project in as much detail as possible, including the
local need(s) the project will address.)
Community Action Partnership of Suburban Hennepin ( CAPSH) provides full cycle
homeownership services to assist low to moderate - income households and
underrepresented populations become and remain successful homeowners. CAPSH'S
full cycle homeownership program includes homebuyer education, home maintenance,
repair and rehab advice, foreclosure prevention and reverse mortgage counseling.
Homeownership is the foundation for wealth creation and the stabilization of families
and communities in America. Owning a home is often referred to as achieving the
"American Dream ". The dream / reality of homeownership also translate to residents
and future residents of the city of Edina. CAPSH continues to partner with the city of
Edina in making the "American Dream" a reality for low to moderate - income
population. As the populations of Edina diversifies (economically and socially),
CAPSH will continue to play an integral role in assisting low to moderate - income
households become and remain successful homeowners in the City of Edina.
City of Edina 2007 CDBG Application
CAPSH
6. Consolidated Plan Priorities: Using the Priority Summary chart below, identify what
priority(ies) the project will meet. (Note: If a proposed project is a low urban county
priority, you must explain why it has a higher priority in your community.)
Priorities
Use X to indicate
Rental Housing
Existing Housing Rehabilitation
X
First Time Homeownership
X
Homelessness
Special Needs Housing
Public Service
Neighborhood Revitalization
Transportation Services
8. Describe anticipated results /accomplishments the project will have. (number of
persons to receive services, number of affordable housing units to be rehabilitated or built,
etc.)
Anticipated Results:
CAPSH anticipates providing the following units of housing service to residents of Edina
(reported per individuals):
0 First -time homebuyer workshops /counseling: 9
0 Foreclosure prevention: 4
0 Rehab /maintenance assistance: 3
0 Reverse mortgage: 4
2006 Results:
Last program year (2006), CAPSH'S full cycle homeownership program provided
housing service to a total of 3,378 (includes short-term services as referral) households
and enrolled a total of 1,384 households in its housing programs. In regards to the city of
Edina, a total 16 households enrolled in CAPSH'S housing program 2006 program year.
Housing Programs
0 First -time homebuyer workshops /counseling:
0 Foreclosure prevention:
0 Rehab /maintenance assistance:
0 Reverse mortgage:
Other Programs
0 Energy Assistance:
0 Budget Counseling:
0 Tax Assistance:
City of Edina 2007 CDBG Application
CAPSH
2006
8
3
2
3
248 HH
35 HH
19 HH
9
• r
9. Implementation Schedule: (Identify major project tasks to occur during/ within the
first 12 months of the 18 month expenditure period. Expenditure period begins July 1,
2007 and ends December 31, 2008.
Time Period Amount/Source Activity Person Responsil
7/1/2007 to $4,000 Edina CDBG Ongoing full cycle homeownership services including: -Scott Zemke,
6/30/2008 Director of
- First -time homebuyer workshops /counseling Operations
- Foreclosure prevention
Rehab /maintenance assistance
Reverse mortgage
Completion Date Ongoing
10. Budget: (Specify total project budget by major funding sources. Attach additional
listings where appropriate.)
* Due to budget, expenses are flat between 2006 and 2007
City of Edina 2007 CDBG Application 3
CAPSH
ALL
Sources of
EXPENSES
PROGRAMS
FUNDING
Funding
Component
CDBG
Other
Total
Identi
Salary
$222,677
$4,000
$218,677
$222,677
HUD
MEOG /CSBG
Benefits
$69,244
$69,244
$69,244
MHFA (all
programs, add.
for FP, 151 HB,
Professional /Counseling services
$3,619
$3,619
$3,619
Incl. consultants, translators, etc
non - English
classes)
Travel
$15,923
$15,923
$15,923
Henn. City
Publications, dues, cert. fees,
$5,363
$5,363
$5,363
CDBG: Consol.
training
Pool, SLP
Private
Printing & Supplies
$8,338
$8,338
$8,338
Donations
Computer, Equipment & Related
$9,234
$9,234
$9,234
(see revenue
breakdown
Direct/Pass- Through Assistance or
$154,913
$154,913
$154,913
In -Kind Expenses (e.g. loans)
below)
Administration (incl. supervision,
$145,961
$145,961
$145,961
postage)
Indirect (rent, phone, etc.)
$39,914
$39,914
$39,914
TOTALI
$675,186
$4,000
$671,186
$675,186
* Due to budget, expenses are flat between 2006 and 2007
City of Edina 2007 CDBG Application 3
CAPSH
Helping People. Changing Lives.
qtion.
community
P A R T N E R S H/ P
PART OF OF SUBURBAN HENNEMN
AMERICA's POVERTY FIGHTING NETWORK
Employment Counseling
January 9, 2007
Energy Assistance
Joyce Repya
Homebuyer Education
Associate Planner
Foreclosure Prevention
City of Edina
Reverse Mortgage Counseling
4801 West 50th Street
Voter Education & Registration
Edina, MN 55424
Home Maintenance &Rehab
Homeless Services
CAPSH, as the anti - poverty community action agency serving suburban
Employment Counseling
RE: Community Action Partnership of Suburban Hennepin
Budget Counseling
2007 Application for CDBG Public Service Funding
Planning & Development
Community Development
Dear Ms. Repya
Tax Assistance
Community Action Partnership of Suburban Hennepin ( "CAPSH ") is pleased
Voter Education & Registration
to submit its 2007 CDBG Public Service Funding request to the City of Edina
Asset Development
Homeless Services
CAPSH, as the anti - poverty community action agency serving suburban
Fiscal Agent Services
Hennepin County, has provided residents of Edina with various services since
Individual Development Accounts
1992. CAPSH services to the City of Edina includes: full -cycle
homeownership, energy assistance, employment counseling and financial /
budget counseling. We look forward to continuing the partnership between
CAPSH and the City of Edina in providing appropriate services to Edina
residents.
If you have any questions, or need additional information, please do not
hesitate to contact me.
ere ,
33 10th Avenue South V
Suite 150
Hopkins, MN 55343 Opheouse Randall,
Tel 952 - 933 -9639
Fax 952 - 933 -8016 Community Developer
www.capsh.org
Our mission: To improve the quality of life in suburban Hennepin
County by creating and supporting links between individuals and
OPPORTUNITY communities through: service, education, and collaboration.
1
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-28
RESOLUTION TO REALLOCATE URBAN HENNEPIN
COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDS AND AUTHORIZE EXECUTION OF ANY
THIRD PARTY AGREEMENTS
City of Edina
WHEREAS, the City of Edina, through execution of a Joint Cooperation Agreement with
Hennepin County, is a subrecipient community in the Urban Hennepin County Community
Development Block Grant Program; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Subrecipient Agreement between the city of Edina and Hennepin
County, the city agrees to assume certain responsibilities for the utilization of Community
Development Block Grant funds; and
WHEREAS, the city of Edina would now like to reallocate Community Development Block
Grant funds previously allocated to the city pursuant to the Subrecipient Agreement.
BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of city of Edina, Minnesota approves the reallocation
of $27,013.32 of Community Development Block Grant funds designated for daycare assistance
formerly administered by Greater Minneapolis Day Care Association (GMDCA), to Jewish
Vocational Services (JVS), a division of Jewish Family & Children's Service of Minneapolis.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor
and its City Manager to execute any required Third Party Agreement on behalf of the City, if such
an agreement is required.
Dated: February 20, 2007
Attest: _
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS
CITY OF EDINA )
James B. Hovland, Mayor
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the
attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of
February 20, 2007 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of --,20—.
City Hall
4801 WEST 50TH STREET
EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394
www.cityofedina.com
City Clerk
952 - 927 -8861
FAX 952 -826 -0390
TTY 952 - 826 -0379
January 12, 2007
Ms. Joyce Repya, Associate Planner
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424 -1394
Dear Ms. Repya:
JVS, a division of Jewish Family and Children's Service (JFCS) of Minneapolis, is
pleased to submit this request for $9,500 in 2007 Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) funding. JVS will utilize these funds to help low- and moderate -
income Edina residents access quality child care programs.
As the new entity administering Hennepin County's Basic Sliding Fee Child Care
Assistance Program, JVS serves eligible parents who are working or going to school
to improve their employment outlook. Having access to quality child care programs
for their children is vital to these parents' productivity and piece of mind while they
strive toward self - sufficiency. However, due to the high amount of need, there is a
waiting list of 12 to 24 months until eligible parents can access these services. CDBG
funding will help bridge this gap in services for the residents in your community.
JVS is also aware that a balance of $27,013.32 was previously unspent for this
program. Therefore, JVS is requesting that the City of Edina reallocate the existing
CDBG funds designated far child care assistance to JVS in addition to $9,500 in 2007
CDBG funding. Together, this funding will help bridge the child care assistance
needs of your community's residents through December 2008.
Thank you for your interest and consideration. JVS is interested in partnering with
the City of Edina to better serve community members in need. I would be happy to
answer any questions you may have. Please contact me at 952- 417 -2130 or
swallace@ivsmn.org. Otherwise, I plan on being at your public hearing on February
20`h to answer any questions that may arise.
Sincerely,
Sue Wallace, Grants Coordinator
JVS is a division of Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis
Affiliate of IAJVS, Accredited by CARF, the Rehabilitation Accreditation Commission
JVS
13100 WAYZATA BLVD.
SUITE 300
MINNETONKA, MN 55305
phone 952 -591 -0300
fax 952 -591 -0227
e -mail jvs @jvsmn.org
web www.jvsmn.org
430 FIRST AVE. NORTH
SUITE 620
MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401
phone 612- 692 -8920
fax 612- 692 -8921
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Judy Helper
NS DIVISION DIRECTOR
Larry S. Greenbaum
NS ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
Carla Richert
FAMILY SERVICE DIVISION
DIRECTOR
Mari Forbush
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OFFICERS
Jeff Mirviss, President'
Debra Orbuch Grayson,
Vice President'
Howard Held, Vice President'
Stacie Nabedrick,
Vice President'
Richard Proman,
Vice President'
Mark Stipakov, Vice President'
Jill Ann Marks, Secretary/
President - Elect'
IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENTS
Etta Barry'
Terri Gordon'
DIRECTORS
Margo Abelson
Kerry Bader
Marilyn Broms
Genya Buslovich
Karen Davidman
Rabbi Alexander Davis
Bob Edelstein
Tamar Fenton
Judy Gaviser
Roni Gingold
Raleigh Johnson
Robert Kelen'
Robert Kramer
Robin Landy
Laura Leventhal
Marc Meirovitz'
Ann Miller
David Nirenstein
Larry Pepper
Jim Rhodes
Jason Rose
Karen Rubin
Adeel Seed
Thomas Segal
Suzanne Singer
Marty Stillman
Jeff Swartz
Jim Tankenoff
Howard Tarkow
Alan Ziskin
Executive Committee
Hennepin County Department of Housing, Community Works & Transit
417 North Fifth Street, Suite 320 612 - 348 -9260, Phone
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401 -1362 612- 348 -9710, Fax
612 -596 -6985, TDD/TYY
www.co.hennepin.mn.us
November 14, 2006
Ms. Joyce Repya
City of Edina
4801 West 50th Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Ms. Repya:
Events over the last 18 months have raised serious concerns over the administrative capabilities of the
Greater Minneapolis Day Care Association (GMDCA) to utilize CDBG funds. Further, Hennepin County
can no longer provide assurance to HUD that GMDCA is able to administer funds in compliance with
Federal laws and regulations. Additionally, Hennepin County and the Minnesota Department of Human
Services have terminated their contracts with GMDCA following their audits of GMDCA.
An October 4, 2006, a letter to Hennepin County and similar letters to several cities from Arthur
Treadwell, GMDCA Interim Executive Director, indicated that as of October 31, 2006, GMDCA "is no
longer able to administer... funds for the CDBG Child Care subsidy contracts." For these reasons,
Hennepin County has exercised its option under paragraph 9.A. of the subrecipient agreement with
GMDCA (for the cities making up the Consolidated Pool) to immediately cancel its agreement with
GMDCA in its entirety. This office is advising all cities with active Third Party Agreements with
GMDCA to do likewise. Funding from Program Year 2005 is still legally available to GMDCA until
these agreements are cancelled.
Third Party Agreements for Program Year 2004 terminated on December 31, 2005. Any unspent 2004
funding is no longer available to GMDCA for day care activities. These dollars are available for
reprogramming or are available for day care services through another third -party provider. See attached
information on funding balances.
We are exploring other options for providing day care services with the Hennepin County Human
Services Department and will advise you of our results. In the interim, Program Year 2006 Subrecipient
and Third Party Agreements will not refer specifically to GMDCA, but to generic "day care services"
until an appropriate provider is identified.
This office will keep you informed of developments in this matter and requests to be copied on any
correspondence sent to GMDCA. Please feel free to contact Mark Hendrickson (612- 348 -2199) or Jim
Ford (612- 348 -6013) with any questions you may have.
Sincer�ly,
Carol A. Kelleher
Administrative Manager
cc: City of Eden Prairie
City of Minnetonka
City of Plymouth
An Equal Opportunity Employer Recycled Paper
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item #
V -A
From: Steve A. Kirchman
Consent
❑
Chief Building Official
Information Only
❑
Date: February 20, 2007
Mgr. Recommends
❑ To HRA
® To Council
Subject: Ordinance 2007 -04. Clarify
Action
❑ Motion
sign permit requirements.
❑ Resolution
Clarify building addressing
requirements.
® Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Recommendation:
Staff recommends City Council adopt Ordinance 2007 -04. Section 1 of the ordinance
will clarify that building permits are required for certain types of signs erected in the City.
Section 2 clarifies it is the responsibility of the Building Official to assign building
address numbers. Staff recommends waiver of second reading.
Info /Background:
Sign Permit Requirements. There have been a number of instances where sign
contractors, after receiving a sign permit, have installed freestanding signs without first
obtaining building permits. Building permits are required in order to determine that
footings are adequately sized and protected and that the sign structure is designed to
resist code required wind loads.
Building Addressing. Building addressing has been the responsibility of the Building
Official for decades, but has not been legally defined as such. Policies have been
established over the years by the Inspections Department and the Fire Department to
insure addressing is implemented with the goal of enhancing public safety.
Attachment: Proposed Ordinance 2007 -04
H: \MyDocuments \Memos &Rpts \Council \Ord07- 4Addresses, Signs \StfRpt07 -4
ORDINANCE NO. 2007 -04
An Ordinance Amending City Code Subsection 460.03,
Subdivision 1 Construction, Maintenance and Repair
And Subdivision 14, Signs and Addresses
THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS:
Section 1 Subdivision 1 of Subsection 460.03 of the City Code is amended to read:
"Subd. 1 Construction, Maintenance and Repair. All signs shall be
constructed in such a manner and of such material that they shall be safe
and substantial, and in full compliance with all requirements of this Code.
Free standing signs requiring footings or wall signs subject to wind loads
must comply with the provisions of Section 410 of the City Code. All signs
shall be maintained in a safe, presentable condition and shall be
structurally sound. Defective parts shall be promptly replaced."
Section 2. Subdivision 14 of Subsection 460.03 of the City Code is amended to read:
"Subd. 14. Address Signs. Address signage shall be required on all
buildings in all districts. The Building Official shall. assign address
numbers to buildings.
Section 3. This ordinance shall be effective upon passage
First Reading:
Second Reading
Published:
Attest
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk
James B. Hovland, Mayor
o e o REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO: Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council
FROM: John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation
VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE:- -. - - - -February 20-,-- 2007___.. _ _ __ _ AGENDA ITEM: -_ VI A.- -..
ITEM DESCRIPTION: 4 x 2 Pick -Up Truck - Braemar Golf Course
Compan y Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet 1. $16,857.89
(State Contract Bid #436607)
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Account #: 5400.1740
Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet $16,857.89 (includes
sales tax)
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is for purchase of a 2007 Chevrolet Silverado 1500 4 x 2 pick -up truck for the Braemar Golf
Course Maintenance Department. It replaces a similar 1994 Chevrolet pick -up truck that will be
sold at the public auction. This pick -up is used for a variety of maintenance functions for the
Braemar Golf Course Maintenance Department. This vehicle is being purchased under the State
Contract Bid #436607 and is funded by the Braemar Golf Course equipment replacement budget,
which currently has $43,978.00 remaining in the 2007 budget. To ensure that the State Bid
Contract is still the most competitive price available, Superintendent of Maintenance Tom
Swenson secured a competing quote from Suburban Chevrolet for the exact same vehicle for
$17,813.00 plus sales tax and license, which is over $2,000 more than the State Bid Contract
price.
John
This Recommended bid is
Director
within budget not wit]
Edina Park and Recreation
nenartment
o e
�J .�y REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
TO:
FROM:
VIA:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council
John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation
Gordon Hughes, City Manager
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
February 20, 2007
AGENDA ITEM: VI. B.
ITEM DESCRIPTION: 13 Golf Cars — Braemar Golf Course
Compan y Amount of Quote or Bid
1. Versatile Vehicles, Inc. 1. $27,700.00
2. Roach Golf Cars 2. $32,185.00
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Account #: 5400.1740
Versatile Vehicles $27,700.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This is for purchase of ten (10) 2007 electric golf cars and three (3) gasoline golf cars. Bids
included trade -in of 13 golf cars (3 gasoline and 10 electric), which were all 2002 year models.
The golf courses maintain a fleet of 84 golf cars that are replaced on a five year schedule.
Presently the fleet consists of 52 electric and 32 gasoline golf cars. Every year approximately 115
of the fleet is replaced. The golf car fleet is currently:
NUMBER OF GOLF CARS
13
18
15
20
18
TOTAL 84
MODEL YEAR
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
This five -year replacement schedule provides the customers with a safe, reliable and attractive
golf car.
The golf car fleet generated approximately $393,000 in 2006. That was an increase of
approximately $42,000 compared to the 2005 season. The demand for golf cars is growing due to
more golfers choosing to ride rather than walk. Braemar charges $28 to rent a golf car for 18
holes.
The lowest bidder for this 2007 purchase was Versatile Vehicles, Inc. at $27,700.00, which
includes a $17,900.00 credit for trade -in of 13 golf cars. In accordance with State law, there is no
sales tax charged for this purchase as each golf car rental customer is charged sales tax with each
rental.
These new 2007 year model golf cars are covered by a three -year parts and labor warranty.
This purchase is funded by the equipment replacement budget, which is budgeted at $50,000.00
for golf car replacements in 2007. This purchase is $22,300 less than the budgeted amount.
Edina Park and Recreation
John KtT44, Director Department `
This Recommended bid is
within bu get
not within budget
Hughes,
Finglnck Director
TO: Mayor & City Council
REQUEST FOR PURCHASE
FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, City Engineer
VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000
DATE: February 20, 2007
ITEM DESCRIPTION: Contract No. ENG 07 -2
Improvement No. LS -36
Comaany
1. Master Mechanical, Inc.
2. Magney Construction, Inc.
3. Gridor constructions, Inc.
4. Jay Bros., Inc.
5. Engineering & Construction Innovations
RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID:
Master Mechanical, Inc.
AGENDA ITEM VI. C.
Street Lift Station Renovation
Amount of Quote or Bid
$ 376,420.00
$ 408,930.00
$ 443,265.00
$ 473,840.00
$ 485,780.00
$ 376,420.00
GENERAL INFORMATION:
This purchase is for the general overhaul and renovation of Lift Station No. 6 located at 72nd
Avenue and Oaklawn Drive. This project is a part of our annual Capital Improvement Plan
work to maintain our infrastructure in proper working condition. Lift Station No. 6 is the largest
sanitary sewer lift station in Edina and pumps an average of 3300 gallons per minute. The
project includes replacement of stairway system, along with upgrades to the pumps,
mechanical ventilation and piping, and electrical system. This project is identified in the Capital
Improvement Plan with $300,000 allocated for the lift station improvements. Staff feels that the
cost overrun is attributable to increase material costs such as copper wiring and the reinforced
fiberglass stairwell system. Staff has also analyzed the bids and feels rebidding the project
would not decrease the costs. The Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund will fund this improvement.
Staff has verified the Contractors references and recommends awarding this bid to Master
Mechanical. Inc.
The Recommended Bid is
within budget
Public Works - Utilities
allin, Finance Director
GAEngineering \Contract Numbers\2007\PW 07 -2 Lift Station No. 6 W. 72nd StWDMIN\MISC\PW 07 -2 RFP.doc
o�
To: Mayor & City Council
From: Debra Mangen
City Clerk
Date: February 20, 2007
Subject: Resolution Receiving
Donations
Recommendation_ :
Adopt Resolution.
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION
Agenda Item # VII. A.
Consent ❑
Information Only ❑
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
® To Council
Action ® Motion
❑ Resolution
Ordinance
Discussion
Info/Background:
In order to comply with State Statutes all donations to the City must be adopted by a
resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I
have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the
recipient departments for your consideration.
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-26
ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON
BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA
of Edina
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations o�i�l r or personal
property for the benefit of its citizens;
WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds
majority of its members.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation
the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens.
Donations to the Edina Art Center
Melanie R. Gaden $10.00
Michelle and David Streitz $10.00
Theresa Stephens $60.00
Dated: February 6, 2007
Attest:
Paul and Laura Thompson
Debra Scherman
Jeff Jones Art Supplies
Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS
CITY OF EDINA )
$10.00
$10.00
$40.00
CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK
I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached
and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of February 20, 2007
and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting.
WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of . 20_.
City Clerk
City Hall 952 - 927 -8861
4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390
EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379
REPORURECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # VII. B.
From: Wayne D. Houle, PE Consent
City Engineer Information Only ❑
Date: February 20, 2007 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
Subject: Set Public Hearing Date for
Todd Park Area Roadway
Improvements: No. BA -340
Recommendation:
® To Council
Action ® Motion
® Resolution
Ordinance
Discussion
Approve resolution calling for Public Hearing on March 20, 2007 for roadway improvements in
the Todd Park Neighborhood, Improvement No. BA -340.
Info /Background:
City staff is requesting these street improvements based on the condition of the streets. Staff
has reviewed this project and has determined it is feasible. A neighborhood informational
meeting was held on Monday, February 12 for this project. A feasibility study will be completed
then submitted to the City Council prior to the Public Hearing. Staff suggests scheduling a
Public Hearing for March 20, 2007.
G: \Engineering \Improvements \BA340 Todd Park Mhood\ADMIN\MISORR_request for public hearing BA340.doc
O Align f
RF.PORT/RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item # VII'. C.
From: Heather Worthington
Consent
Assistant City Manager
Information Only
Date: February 20, 2007
Mgr. Recommends F-1
To HRA
®
To Council
Subject: Ground Lease for Cellular
Equipment at Garden Park
Action ®
Motion
Resolution
®
Ordinance
Discussion
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Council approve a ground lease arrangement
with T- Mobile Cellular for installation of ground equipment to power a
cellular antenna at Garden Park.
INFO/BACKGROUND:
T- Mobile Cellular has approached the City for permission to install
ground equipment to power a cellular antenna which they will mount to
the Xcel Energy transmission tower that bisects Garden Park.. T- Mobile
has secured a separate lease agreement with Xcel Energy for use of their
tower.
The ground lease will measure approximately 14 x 20 feet, and will be
completely screened from the roadway and the park. The site is located in
a "bowl" formed by the driveway leading into the park from Hansen
Road, and so is naturally screened from the roadway and adjacent homes.
REPORT/ RECOMMENDATION: Cellular Equipment - Garden Park
February 20, 2007
Page two
T- Mobile has conferred with Parks and Recreation staff, and they have
recommended some natural, evergreen screening around the equipment.
The City Engineer has reviewed the plan and approved it.
The terms of this ground lease are $300.00 per month, for a five -year lease
($3,600.00 per year). There are provisions for extension of the lease up to
four additional five -year terms. The rent will increase 5% each year of the
lease.
LEASE AGREEMENT
THIS LEASE AGREEMENT (Agreement), dated as of the latter of the signature dates
below (the "Effective Date "), is entered into by the City of Edina, a municip al corporation under
the laws of the State of Minnesota (hereinafter referred to as "Landlord "), and T- Mobile Central
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, having a mailing address of 855 0 Bryn Mawr Ave.
Suite 100, Chicago, IL 60631 (hereinafter referred to as Tenant).
BACKGROUND
Landlord owns or controls that certain plot, parcel or tract. of land, together with all rights
and privileges arising in connection therewith, located at 5520 Hansen Road, also known as
Garden Park (collectively, the "Property"). Tenant desires to use a portion of the Property in
connection with its federally licensed communications business. Landlord desires to grant to
Tenant the right to use a portion of the Property in accordance with this Agreement.
The parties agree as follows:
1. LEASE. Landlord grants to Tenant a lease on certain portion of the Property containing
approximately (300) three hundred square feet as described on attached Exhibit 1, together with
non - exclusive access for Tenant's uses from the nearest public right -of -way along the Property
to the Premises as described on the attached Exhibit 1 (collectively, the "Premises ").
2. PERMITTED USE. Tenant may use the Premises for the transmission and reception of
communications signals and the installation, construction, maintenance, operation, repair,
replacement and upgrade of its communications fixtures and related equipment, cables,
accessories and improvements, which may include a suitable support structure, associated
antennas, equipment shelters or cabinets and fencing and any other items necessary to the
successful and secure use of the Premises (collectively, the "Communication Facility "); Tenant
further has the right to add, modify and/or replace equipment in order to be in compliance with
any current or future federal, state or local mandated application, including, but not limited to,
emergency 911 communication services, at no additional cost to Landlord (collectively, the
"Permitted Use "). Landlord and Tenant agree that any portion of the Communication Facility
that may be conceptually described on Exhibit 1 will not be deemed to limit Tenant's Permitted
Use. If Exhibit 1 includes drawings of the initial installation of the Communication Facility,
Landlord's execution of this Agreement will signify Landlord's approval of Exhibit 1. Tenant
has the right to install and operate transmission cables from the equipment shelter or cabinet to
the antennas, electric lines from the main feed to the equipment shelter or cabinet and
communication lines from the main entry point to the equipment shelter or cabinet, and .to make
reasonable improvements, alterations, upgrades or additions appropriate for Tenant's use
"Tenant Changes "). No such Tenant Changes shall in any manner interfere, disturb, hinder or
obstruct the use of the Property by Landlord's other tenants. Tenant Changes include the right to
construct a non - obtrusive, decorative fence around the Premises and undertake any other
appropriate means,_with Landlord's consent, to secure the Premises, not to be unreasonably
withheld, delayed or conditioned. Any fence installed by Tenant must be in compliance with all
applicable laws, rules, regulations, codes and ordinances. Tenant further agrees to comply with
all applicable governmental laws, rules, statutes and regulations relating to its use of the
Communication Facility on the Property. Tenant has the right to modify, supplement, replace,
upgrade, expand the equipment, increase the number of antennas or relocate the Communication
Facility within the Premises at any time during the'term of this Agreement. Nothing in this
Section shall be deemed to grant Tenant the right to use any portion of the Property other than
the Premises.
3. TERM.
(a) The initial lease term ( "Initial Lease Term ") commences on the Effective Date ""
and expires on the day before the fifth (5th) annual anniversary of the Rent Commencement Date
(as defined below).
(b) This Agreement will automatically renew, for four (4) additional five (5) year
term(s) (each five (5) year term shall be defined as the "Extension Term "), upon the same terms
and conditions unless the Tenant notifies the Landlord in writing of Tenant's intention not to
renew this. Agreement at least sixty. (60) days prior to the expiration of the existing Term, or
unless this Agreement is terminated as provided herein.
(c) If Tenant remains in possession of the Premises after the termination or expiration
of this Agreement, then Tenant will be deemed to be occupying the Premises on a month to
month basis (the "Holdover Term "), subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement,
except that Rent during any Holdover Term shall be double the Rent payable for the month
immediately preceding the first month Holdover Term. Rent payable during a Holdover Term
will not be prorated for any partial month.
(d) The Initial Term, the Extension Term and the Holdover Term are collectively
referred to as the Term ( "Term ").
4. RENT.
(a) Commencing on the earlier of (i) the date construction commences at the
Premises, or (ii) , 2007 (such earlier date herein afterxeferred to as the "Rent
Commencement Date "), Tenant will pay the Landlord a monthly rental payment of three
hundred and No /100 Dollars ($300.00), or $3,600 per annum ( "Rent "), on or, before the fifth
(5th) day of each lease year in advance. For partial years occurring after the Rent
Commencement Date, Rent will be prorated. Landlord and Tenant acknowledge that the initial
Rent payment will be forwarded by Tenant to Landlord within Fifteen (15) days. after the Rent
Commencement Date. Rent shall be delivered to Landlord at 4801 W. 50' St., Edina, MN
55424, until Landlord delivers written notice to Tenant.that Rent should be sent to an alternate
address.
(b) Beginning on the first anniversary of the Rent Commencement date, and on each
anniversary thereafter, including throughout any Extension Terms exercised, the monthly rent
will increase by five percent (5 %) over the Rent paid during the previous year.
(c) Tenant agrees to pay its proportionate share (the ratio of square footage of the
Premises to the square footage of the Property) of any and all real estate taxes assessed against
the Property and any and all special taxes or assessments of any kind levied by any branch of
government with authority over the Property. Tenant shall be solely responsible for any taxes or
fees assessed on Tenant's personal property or Tenant's particular use of the Premises. Any
sums owed by Tenant pursuant to this Agreement, including but not limited to taxes and utility
charges, payable to Landlord, may be collected by Landlord as additional rent.
5. APPROVALS.
The following conditions must be satisfied prior to the Term Commencement Date, or
shall be deemed waived:
(a) Tenant has the right to obtain a title report or commitment for a leasehold title
policy from a title insurance company of its choice and to have the Property surveyed by a
surveyor of Tenant's choice,_all at Tenant's sole expense. In the event Tenant determines, in its
sole discretion, due to the title report results or survey results, that the condition of the Premises
is unsatisfactory, Tenant will have the right to terminate this Agreement upon notice to Landlord.
(b) Tenant may also perform and obtain, at Tenant's sole cost and expense, soil
borings, percolation tests, engineering procedures, environmental investigation or other tests or
reports on, over, and under the Property, necessary to determine if the Tenant's use of the
Premises will be compatible with Tenant's engineering specifications, system, design, operations
or Government Approvals. Tenant shall fully indemnify Landlord for any claims, causes of
action or losses arising due to Tenant's presence on the Property.
6. TERMINATION. This Agreement may be terminated, without penalty or further
liability, as follows: by either party on thirty (30) days prior written notice, if the other party
remains in default under Paragraph 15 Default and Right to Cure of this Agreement after the
applicable cure periods; by Tenant on thirty (30) days prior written notice, if the Property is or
becomes unacceptable under Tenant's design or engineering specifications for its Antenna
Facilities or the communications system to which the Antenna Facilities belong.
7. INSURANCE. Tenant will carry during the Term, at its own cost and expense, the
following insurance: (i) "All Risk" property insurance for its property's replacement cost; (ii)
commercial general liability insurance with a minimum limit of liability of $2,500,000 combined
single limit for bodily injury or death/property damage arising out of any one occurrence; and
(iii) Workers' Compensation Insurance as required by law. The coverage afforded by Tenant's
commercial general liability insurance shall apply to Landlord as an additional insured, but only
with respect to Landlord's liability arising out of its interest in the Property. Landlord has no
obligation to carry any insurance on the Property or any of the improvements thereon.
8. INTERFERENCE.
(a) Where there are existing radio frequency user(s) on the Property, the Landlord
will provide Tenant with a list of all existing radio frequency user(s) on the Property to allow
Tenant to evaluate the potential for interference. Tenant warrants that its use of the Premises will
not interfere with existing radio frequency user(s) on the Property so disclosed by Landlord, as
long as the existing radio frequency user(s) operate and continue to operate within their
respective frequencies and in accordance with all applicable laws and regulations.
(b) Landlord will not grant, after the date of this Agreement, a lease, license or any
other right to any third party for the use of the Property, if such use may in any way adversely
affect or interfere with the Communication Facility, the operations of Tenant or the rights of
Tenant under this Agreement. Landlord will notify Tenant in writing prior to granting any third
party the right to install and operate communications equipment on the Property.
3
(c) Landlord will not use, nor will Landlord permit its employees, tenants, licensees,
invitees or agents to use, any portion of the Property in any way which interferes with the
Communication Facility, the operations of Tenant or the rights of Tenant under this Agreement.
Landlord will cause such interference to cease within twenty -four (24) hours after receipt of
notice of interference from Tenant. In the event any such interference does not cease within the
aforementioned cure period then the parties acknowledge that Tenant will suffer irreparable
injury, and therefore, Tenant will have the right, in addition to any other rights that it may have
at law or in equity, for Landlord's breach of this Agreement, to elect to enjoin such interference
or to terminate this Agreement upon notice to Landlord.
9. INDEMNIFICATION.
(a) Tenant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Landlord harmless from and against
any and all injury, loss, damage or liability (or any claims in respect of the foregoing), costs or
expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs) arising directly from the
installation, use, maintenance, repair or removal of the Communication Facility or Tenant's
breach of any provision of this Agreement, except to the extent attributable to the negligent or
intentional act or omission of Landlord, its employees, agents or independent contractors.
(b) Landlord agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Tenant harmless from and against
any and all injury, loss, damage or liability (or any claims in respect of the foregoing), costs or
expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees and court costs) arising directly from Landlord's
breach of any provision of this Agreement, except to the extent attributable to the negligent or
intentional act or omission of Tenant, its employees, agents or independent contractors.
(c) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, Tenant and Landlord
each waives any claims that each may have against the other with respect to consequential,
incidental or special damages.
10. WARRANTIES.
(a) Tenant and Landlord each acknowledge and represent that it is duly organized,
validly existing and in good standing and has the right, power and authority to enter into this
Agreement and bind itself hereto through the person set forth as signatory for the Party below.
(b) Landlord represents and warrants that: (i) Landlord solely owns the Property as a
legal lot in fee simple, or controls the Property by lease or license; (ii) the Property is not
encumbered by any liens, restrictions, mortgages, covenants, conditions, easements, leases, or
any other agreements of record or not of record, which would adversely affect Tenant's
Permitted Use and enjoyment of the Premises under this Agreement; (iii) as long as Tenant is not
in default, then Landlord grants to Tenant sole, actual, quiet and peaceful use, enjoyment and
possession of the Premises (except access areas of which Tenant has non - exclusive use); and (iv)
Landlord's execution and performance of this Agreement will not violate any laws, ordinances,
covenants or the provisions of any mortgage, lease or other agreement binding on the Landlord.
11. ENVIRONMENTAL.
(a) Landlord and Tenant agree to hold harmless and indemnify the other from, and to
assume all duties, responsibilities and liabilities at the sole cost and expense of the indemnifying
party for, payment of penalties, sanctions, forfeitures, losses, costs or damages, and for
responding to any action, notice, claim, order, summons, citation, directive, litigation,
investigation or proceeding which is related to (i) the indemnifying party's, failure to comply
4
with any environmental or industrial hygiene law, including without limitation any regulations,
guidelines, standards or policies of any governmental authorities regulating or imposing
standards of liability or standards of conduct with regard to any environmental or industrial
hygiene conditions or matters as may now or hereafter be in effect, or (ii) any environmental or
industrial hygiene conditions that arise out of or are in any way related to the condition of the .
Property and activities conducted by the party thereon, unless the environmental conditions are
caused by the other party.
(b) The indemnifications of this Paragraph 11 Environmental specifically include
reasonable costs, expenses and fees incurred in connection with any investigation of Property
conditions or any clean-up, remediation, removal or restoration work required by any
governmental authority. The provisions of this Paragraph 11 Environmental will survive the
expiration or termination of this Agreement.,
(c) In the event Tenant becomes aware of any hazardous materials on the Property, or
any environmental or industrial hygiene condition or matter relating to the Property that, in
Tenant's sole determination, renders the condition of the Premises or Property unsuitable for
Tenant's use, or if Tenant believes that the leasing or continued leasing of the Premises would
expose Tenant to undue risks of government action, intervention or third -party liability, Tenant
will have the right, in addition to any other rights it may have at law or in equity, to terminate the
Agreement upon notice to Landlord, unless the condition was caused by Tenant or any third
party acting on Tenant's behalf.
12. ACCESS. At all times throughout the Term of this Agreement, and at no additional
charge to Tenant, Tenant and its employees, agents, and subcontractors, will have twenty -four
(24) hour per day, seven (7) day per week pedestrian and vehicular access to and over the
Property, from an open and improved public road to the Premises, for the installation,
maintenance and operation of the Communication Facility and any utilities serving the Premises.
Landlord grants to Tenant a non - exclusive easement for such access and Landlord agrees to
provide to Tenant such codes, keys and other instruments necessary for such access at no
additional cost to Tenant. Upon Tenant's request, Landlord will execute a separate, mutually
acceptable, recordable easement evidencing this right. In the event any public utility is unable to
use the access or easement provided to Tenant then the Landlord agrees to grant additional
access or an easement either to Tenant or to the public utility, for the benefit of Tenant, at no cost
to Tenant.
13. REMOVAURESTORATION. All portions of the Communication Facility brought onto
the Property by Tenant will be and remain Tenant's personal property and, at Tenant's option,
may be removed by Tenant at any time during the Term. Landlord covenants and agrees that no
part of the Communication Facility constructed, erected or placed on the Premises by Tenant will
become, or be considered as being affixed to or a part of, the Property, it being the specific
intention of the Landlord that all improvements of every kind and nature constructed, erected or
placed by Tenant on the Premises will be and remain the property of the Tenant and may be
removed by Tenant at any time during the Term. Within one hundred twenty (120) days after the
expiration or earlier termination of this Agreement, Tenant shall remove all of its property,
equipment, and installations from the Premises, and shall restore the entire Property to the usable
condition it existed prior to the commencement of this Agreement, wear and tear and casualty
excepted, unless otherwise specifically agreed by Landlord.
5
14. MAINTENANCE/UTILITIES.
(a) Tenant will keep and maintain the Premises. in good condition, reasonable wear
and tear and damage from the elements excepted. Landlord will maintain and repair the Property
and access thereto, in good and tenantable condition, subject to reasonable wear and tear and
damage from the elements.
(b) Tenant will be responsible for paying on a monthly or quarterly basis all utilities
charges for electricity, telephone service or any other utility used or consumed.by Tenant on the
Premises. In the event Tenant cannot secure its own metered electrical supply, Tenant will have
the right, at its own cost and expense, to submeter from Landlord. When submetering is
necessary and available, Landlord will read the meter on a monthly or quarterly basis and
provide Tenant with the necessary usage data in a timely manner to enable Tenant to compute
such utility charges. Landlord will cooperate with any utility company requesting an easement
over, under and across the Property in order for the utility company to provide service to Tenant.
Landlord will not be responsible for interference with, interruption or failure of any such services
to be furnished or supplied by Landlord for any cause whatsoever other than. Landlord's willful
misconduct.
15. DEFAULT AND RIGHT TO CURE.
(a) The following will be deemed a default by Tenant and a breach of this
Agreement: (i) non payment of Rent if such Rent remains unpaid for more than twenty five (25)
days after receipt of written notice from Landlord of such failure to pay; or (ii) Tenant's failure
to perform any other term or condition under this Agreement within thirty (30) days after receipt
of written notice, from Landlord specifying the failure. No such failure, however,. will be deemed
to exist for a non - monetary default if Tenant has commenced to cure such default within such
period and provided that such efforts are prosecuted to completion with reasonable diligence.
Delay in curing a default will be excused if due to causes beyond the reasonable control of
Tenant. If Tenant remains in default beyond any applicable.cure period, Landlord will have the
right to exercise any and all rights and remedies available to it under law and equity.
(b) The following will be deemed a default by Landlord and a breach of this .
Agreement. Landlord's failure to perform any term, condition or breach of any warranty or
covenant under this Agreement within thirty (30) days after receipt of written notice from Tenant
specifying the failure. No such failure, however, will be deemed to exist if Landlord has
commenced to cure the default within such period and provided such efforts are prosecuted to
completion with reasonable diligence. Delay in curing a default will be excused if due to causes
beyond the reasonable control of Landlord. If Landlord remains in default beyond any
applicable cure period, Tenant will have the right to exercise any.and all rights available to it
under law and equity.
16. ASSIGNMENT /SUBLEASE: Tenant has the right to assign this Lease or sublease the
Premises to any entity which controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with,
Tenant,; provided that if any contemplated assignee or subtenant is not in the same or better
financial condition as Tenant is on the date hereof then Tenant shall remain liable under this
Lease. Any other assignment of this Lease or sublease of the Premises without the prior consent
of Landlord is strictly prohibited and an attempted assignment or sublease without Landlord's
consent is void, provided that Landlord's consent shall not be unreasonably withheld,
conditioned or delayed.
2
17. NOTICES. All notices, requests, demands and communications hereunder will be given
by first class certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, or by a nationally recognized
overnight courier, postage prepaid, to -be effective when properly sent and received, refused or
returned undelivered. Notices will be addressed to the parties as follows:
If to Tenant:
T- Mobile Central LLC
8550 W. Bryn,Mawr Ave. Suite 100
Chicago, IL 60631
Attn: Lease Administration
with a copy to:
T- Mobile USA
12920 SE 38`i' St.
Bellevue, WA 98006
Attn: PCS Lease Administration
If to Landlord:
Heather Worthington
Asst. City Manager
City of Edina
4801 W. 50`t' St.
Edina, MN 55424
Either party hereto may change the place for the giving of notice to it by thirty (30) days prior
written notice to the other as provided herein.
18. SEVERABILITY. If any term or condition of this Agreement is found unenforceable,
the remaining terms and conditions will remain binding upon the parties as though said
unenforceable provision were not contained herein. However, if the invalid, illegal or
unenforceable provision materially affects this Agreement then the Agreement may be
terminated by either party on ten (10) business days prior written notice to the other party hereto.
19. CONDEMNATION. In the event Landlord receives notification of any condemnation
proceedings affecting the Property, Landlord will provide notice of the proceeding to Tenant
within ten (10) business days. If a condemning authority takes all of the Property, or a portion
sufficient, in Tenant's sole reasonable determination, to render the Premises unsuitable for
Tenant, this Agreement will terminate as of the date the title vests in the condemning authority.
The parties will each be entitled to pursue their own separate awards in the condemnation
proceeds, provided that any award to Tenant will not diminish Landlord's recovery. Tenant will
be entitled to reimbursement for any prepaid Rent on a prorata basis.
20. CASUALTY. Landlord will provide notice to Tenant of any casualty affecting the
Property within ten (10) business days . after the casualty. If any part of the Communication
Facility or Property is damaged by fire or other casualty so as to render the Premises unsuitable,
in Tenant's sole, reasonable determination, then Tenant may terminate this Agreement by
7
providing written notice to the Landlord, which termination will be effective as of the date of
such damage or destruction. Upon such termination, Tenant will be entitled to collect all
insurance proceeds payable to Tenant on account thereof and to be reimbursed for any prepaid
Rent on a prorata basis.
21. MISCELLANEOUS.
(a) Amendment/Waiver. This Agreement cannot be amended, modified or revised
unless done in writing and signed by an authorized agent of the Landlord and an authorized agent
of the Tenant. No provision may be waived except in a writing signed by both parties.
(b) Memorandum/Short Form Lease. No memorandum of lease or short form of the
same shall be recorded.
(c) Bind and Benefit. The terms and conditions contained in this Agreement will run
with the Property and bind and inure to the benefit of the parties, their respective heirs,
executors, administrators, successors and assigns.
(d) Entire Agreement. This Agreement and the exhibits attached hereto, all being a
part hereof, constitute the entire agreement of the parties hereto and will supersede all prior
offers, negotiations and agreements with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement.
(e) Governing Law. This Agreement will be governed by the laws of the state in
which the Premises are located, without regard to conflicts of law.
(f) Interpretation. Unless otherwise specified, the following rules of construction and
interpretation apply: (i) captions are for convenience and reference only and in no way define or
limit the construction of the terms and conditions hereof, (ii) use of the term "including" will be
interpreted to mean "including but not limited to "; (iii) whenever a party's consent is required
under this Agreement, except as otherwise stated in the Agreement or as same may be
duplicative, such consent will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed; (iv) exhibits
are an integral part of the Agreement and are incorporated by reference into this Agreement; (v)
use of the terms "termination" or "expiration" are interchangeable; and (vi) reference to a default
will take into consideration any applicable notice, grace and cure periods.
(g) Estoppel. Either party will, at any time upon twenty (20) business days prior
written notice from the other, execute, acknowledge and deliver to the other a statement in
writing (i) certifying that this Agreement is unmodified and in full force and effect (or, if
modified, stating the nature of such modification and certifying this Agreement, as so modified,
is in full force and effect) and the date to which the Rent and other charges are paid in advance,
if any, and (ii) acknowledging that there are not, to such party's knowledge, any uncured defaults
on the part of the other. party hereunder, or specifying such defaults if any are claimed. Any such
statement may be conclusively relied upon by any prospective purchaser or encumbrancer of the
Premises. The requested party's failure to deliver such a statement within such time will be
conclusively relied upon by the requesting party that (i) this Agreement is in full force and effect,
without modification except as may be properly represented by the requesting party, (ii) there are
no uncured defaults in either party's performance, and (iii) no more than one month's Rent has
been paid in advance.
(h) No Electronic Signature/No Option. The submission of this Agreement to any
party for examination or consideration does not constitute an offer, reservation of or option for
E:3
the Premises based on the terms set forth herein. This Agreement will become effective as a
binding Agreement only upon the handwritten legal execution, acknowledgment and delivery
hereof by Landlord and Tenant.
(i) Security Deposit. Concurrently with the execution of this Lease, Tenant shall pay
to Landlord, a security deposit in the amount of $1,000.00 and No/ 100 Dollars ($1,000.00),
which shall be non - refundable to Tenant.. In no way shall this amount be construed as a payment
of rent, liquidated damage award, or otherwise limit Landlord's claim for damages in the event
of a default by Tenant hereunder.
0) Counterparts. This Agreement may be exercised in any number of counterparts,
which, when taken together, shall constitute a complete original instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be effective as of
the last date written below.
"LANDLORD"
City of Edina
By:
Print Name: _
Its:
By:
Print Name: _
Its:
"TENANT"
By: T- Mobile Central LLC
Print Name: Hossein Sepehr
Its: Director of Engineering and Operations_
[ACKNOWLEDGMENTS APPEAR ON THE NEXT PAGE]
9
TENANT ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF MINNESOTA
ss:
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
bn the day of , 2007, before me personally appeared Hossein Sepehr, and
acknowledged under oath that he is the Director of Engineering and Operations of T- Mobile Central
LLC; a Delaware limited liability corporation , and as such was authorized to execute this instrument on
behalf of the corporation.
Notary Public:
My Commission Expires:
LANDLORD ACKNOWLEDGMENT
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
ss:
COUNTY OF )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of
2005, by and , the
and , respectively, of the City of Edina, a
Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the municipal corporation.
Notary Public:
My Commission Expires:
10,
EXHIBIT 1
DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES
1 14833 -5284- 6593 \1 2/15/2007 3:29 PM
d8
, -weae fr-0 woe
■ccm ouorw,
I
de
■e
ere
asm
SnewuA
GRDN
\mv
E:
AR
/=
�
--
■
I
III
III i �:
i§
SITE PLAN
e
■m
w.e evawe
■ T • • Mobile
NMIO, w [
w o - ■m wm wro v r
.M n r0
w fu ow M.rY■ w w a 1a m
� [ 1 ur -0 M ®m■ ■ m
m
°icm M
ww , ■■ "r • r. r...rAme." w."".'°. "
'°"
TRA CY
EDINA VERNON /TRACY
XCEL TOWER 6100
Al P132
PLAN
9 •
V"
■uo o,
eHLm
®A
MM1 [
wa r ae r
, ,s�,aW
lO,
mMmeb —
laes
r■ u
w
5520 HA WSEN ROAD
EDINA. NINNESOG
t ?
B
w
aw -- ATP132 -Cl i
MINNEAPOLIS MARKET
6
mD eD we® -m oeo mono
oe
v �
• I�Qp�88 �i
AGENDA ITEM VII.D.
HIGHLAND PARK CELL TOWER
CONTINUED TO MARCH 6, 2007
Z No packet data
F-1 Oral presentation
❑ Information coming
0
To: City Council
From: James B. Hovland
Mayor
Date: February 20, 2007
Subject: Appointments to Boards,
Commissions, Committees
REPORT /RECOMMEN DATIQN
Agenda Item VII. E.
Consent ❑
Information Only
Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA
® To Council
Action ® Motion
Resolution
Ordinance
❑ Discussion
Recommendation:
Endorse Mayor's recommendations for appointments as presented.
Info/Background:
I will bring my recommendations for appointments to the various boards, commissions and
committees serving the City on Tuesday evening.
r L! 40
CITY C.
AA
2/t. 9:12:55
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 1
2/8/2007
-218/2007
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
293882
21812007
102971 ACE ICE COMPANY
102,26
154297
607906
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
71.80
154298
607910
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
47.20
154299
607897
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING .
221.26
293883
218/2007
100615 ACME WINDOW CLEANING INC
1,054.35
RAMP CLEANING 00005146
154359
062179
1375.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PARKING RAMP
1,054.35
293884
2/8/2007
100616 ACTION MAILING SERVICES INC.
319.38
MAIL PROCESSING
154232
203821
5910.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GENERAL (BILLING)
319.38
293885
2/8/2007
102191 ADVANCED GRAPHIC SYSTEMS INC.
188.35
CARTRIDGES
154360
1W00074131
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
188.35
293886
218/2007
105262 ALEX AIR APPARATUS INC.
1,545.23
COMPRESSOR PARTS 00003738
154520
11731 •
1470.6530
REPAIR PARTS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,545.23
293887
2/8/2007
102715 ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING
27.32
WINE BOTTLE TAGS
154403
64042
5842.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
YORK SELLING
27.32
WINE BOTTLE TAGS
154403
64042
5862.6122
ADVERTISING.OTHER
VERNON SELLING
54.64
293888
2/812007
116726 ALLISON, SHARON
720.08
TUITION REIMBURSEMENT
154534
020207
1260.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
ENGINEERING GENERAL
720.08
TUITION REIMBURSEMENT
154673
2102
1260.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
ENGINEERING GENERAL
1,440.16
293889
2/8/2007
103285 AMEM
100.00
MEMBERSHIP - KEN CARLSON
154488
020107
1400.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
100.00
293890
218/2007
102575 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIAT
825.00
COLORING BOOKS 00005016
154361
682520
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
825.00
293891
2/8/2007
101601 AMUNDSON, ERIK
547.79
UNIFORM PURCHASE
154489
020107
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
CITY OF EDINA
217/2007 9:12:55
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page -. 2
218/2007
-218/2007
- Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
547.79
293892
21812007
100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC.
710.79
COPIER PAPER
154427
10093111 -00 '
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
710.79
293893
218/2007
102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER
123.48
VEHICLE RADIO REPAIRS
00005130 154233
72204
1553.6237
RADIO SERVICE
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
143.81
VEHICLE RADIO REPAIRS
00005130 154234
72205
1553.6237
RADIO SERVICE
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
88.28
VEHICLE RADIO REPAIRS
00005130 154235
72206
1553.6237
RADIO SERVICE
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
131.18
VEHICLE RADIO REPAIRS
00005130 154236
72209
1553.6237
RADIO SERVICE
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
53.83
VEHICLE RADIO REPAIRS
00005130 154237
72208
1553.6237
RADIO SERVICE
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
83.49
VEHICLE RADIO REPAIRS
00005130 154238
72202
1553.6237
RADIO SERVICE
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
624.07
293.694
2/8/2007
102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE
717.55
FOOD
154404
700739
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GRILL
717.55
293895
2/8/2007
104235 APPLIED MEDIA
100.00
PERFORMANCE 2113/07
154398
020107
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION ..
100.00
293896
2/8/2007
100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO.
22.37
TRIP SPRINGS
00001940 154239
10015325.
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
22.37
293897
21812007.
101405 ASSET RECOVERY CORP.
112.24
RECYCLING SERVICES
154535
6509689 -IN
1550.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
112.24
293898
2/8/2007
104069 B.B. WATSON GRAPHIC DESIGN
76.66
BUSINESS CARDS
154490
438
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
76.68
293899
218 @007
102195 BATTERIES PLUS
35.23
BATTERIES
00005036 154240
18 -16778
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION'
138.09
FLASHLIGHT BATTERIES
154491
18- 167953
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
173.32
293900
2/8/2007
100607 BAUER, MICHAEL
288.94
2007 UNIFORM PURCHASE
154241
012907
1301.6201
LAUNDRY
GENERAL MAINTEN'
to
CITY L.
AA
2fo, 9:12:55
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 3
218/2007
-2/8/2007
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
288.94
293901 218/2007
101245 BELL, BRUCE
150.00
PERFORMANCE 2115/07
154399
020107
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
150.00
293902 21812007
101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION
104.00
154300
39787700
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
89.29
154301
42564900
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
88.45
154302
42540100
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
1,938.09
154303
39787800
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
100.20
154449
39831300
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE .
VERNON SELLING
412.00
154602
39792000
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
2,732.03
293903 218/2007
100661 SENN, BRADLEY
97.55
SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT
154428.
012607
5112.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ART CENTER POTTERY
97.55
293904 21812007
120727 BERGO ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
7,790.00
WOODCRAFT WORK
154405
2689,
2127.6103.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
COMM DEV BLK GRANT
7,790.00
293905 2/8/2007
100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS
14.86
PEN REFILLS
00005128 154242
WO. 436591 -1
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
211.32
OFFICE SUPPLIES
154406
WO- 437935 -1
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
20.44
OFFICE SUPPLIES
154407
WO- 437389 -1
1120.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ADMINISTRATION
88.73
MARKERS, PENS, SHEARS
00005154 154429
W0-437025 -1
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
60.36,
OFFICE SUPPLIES
.00003731 154521
OE- 95453 -1
1470.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
55.31
SHARPENER, FOLDERS
00006433 154536
OE- 96473 -1
5410.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
82.71
OFFICE SUPPLIES
154674
WO- 431031 -1
1600.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
63.89
TONER
00005176 154675
WO. 430964 -1
1552.6406.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
8.40
PHONE REST
00005173 154676
WO. 430961 -1
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
606.02
293906 2/8/2007
104053 BIOCLEAN MOBILE WASH INC.
777.45
VEHICLE WASHING
00001271 154243
65921
1553.6238
CAR WASH
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
777.45
293907. 2/8/2007
119431 BLINK BONNIE
94.89
BOX LUNCHES
154362
408
1140.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PLANNING
94.89
CITY OF EDINA
217/2007 9:12:55
R55CKREG LOG20000
Page - 4
Council Check Register
2/82007
- 218/2007
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
293908
2/8/2007
120205 BLUE STAR POWER SYSTEMS INC..
3,248.25
FINAL PAYMENT 154529
02, 0807
5900.1740.
MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT
UTILITY BALANCE SHEET
3,248.25
293909
2/8/2007
100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS
29.52
TENSIONER KIT 00001942 154244
951242
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS,
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
434.95
TENSIONER KITS, BELTS 00001942 154245.
951089
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
33.66
SWITCH ASSEMBLY 00001975 154246
950343
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
498.13
293910
218/2007
103244 BURTIS, ROBERT
300.00
PERFORMANCE 2/10/07 154396
020107
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
300.00
293911
2/8/2007
102083 CALHOUN ISLES COMMUNITY BAND
100.00
PERFORMANCE 2/11/07 154397
020107
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
100.00
293912
216/2007
119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES
14.35
154304
102596
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
918.85
154305
102595
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER -
50TH ST SELLING
2,719.75
154603
102598
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
3.652.95
293913
21812007.
100677 CARGILL INC.
10,651.91
DE -ICING SALT 00005000 154247
-1800401
1318.6517
SAND GRAVEL & ROCK
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
6,293.87
DE -ICING SALT 00005000 154248
1798095
1318.6525
SALT
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
16,945.78
293914
2182007
116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE
192.00
154306
46677
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE_.
YORK.SELLING
93.00
154450
46717
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING,
285.00
293915
2/812007
119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO
71.95
154307
329891.
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
71.95
293916
2182007
120738 CHRYSALIS
3,600.00
2007 FUNDING 154537
013107
1504.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION
3,600.00
CITY O.
NA
21.. 9:12:55
R55CKREG LOG20000
-
Council Check Register
Page - 5
2/8/2007
-2/8/2007
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No,
No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
293917
2/6 /2007
105693 CITYSPRINT
.16.90
COURIER
154538
4896
1180.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ELECTION
25.55
COURIER
154538
4896
1260.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ENGINEERING GENERAL
173.99
COURIER
154538.
4896
1554.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
CENT SERV GEN - MIS'
216.44
293918
218/2007
100688 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERVICES INC
14.38
WINDOW CLEANING
154579
993516
5861.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
VERNON OCCUPANCY
16.62
WINDOW CLEANING
154579
393516
5821.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
27.04
WINDOW CLEANING
154579
393516.
5841.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
YORK OCCUPANCY
58.04
293919
21812007
101227 COFFEE MILL INC.
390.00
COCOA & CAPPUCCINO MIX
00002370 154539
0738739 -IN
5630.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
CENTENNIAL LAKES
390.00
293920
2/8/2007
101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
285.91
GLOVES, EARPLUGS
00001932 154249
02979128
1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
72.86
GLOVES
00001920 154250
02977258
1646.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT.
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
10.25
GLOVES
00001693 154251
02978472
1553.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
159.25
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
00005017 154408
02981401
1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
.GENERAL MAINTENANCE
528.27
293921
218/2007
116356 CONSTRUCTION MIDWEST INC.
1,219.43
COATING, PRIMER
00001905 154252
379567
5912.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDINGS
671.53
UREGARD, ROLLER COVER
00001900 154253
379566
5912.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDINGS
297.50
SIKAFLEX
00005022 154430
379721
5912.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDINGS
2,188.48
293922
2/812007
103171 CORPORATE ADVERTISING & INCENT
1,842.57
CHAMPIONSHIP SHIRTS
154522
.98021
4077.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
1,842.57
293923
2/8/2007
101915 COUNTRY FLAGS
158.69
FLAGS, GOLD BALL
154363.
2900
1551.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CITY HALL GENERAL
158.69
293924
2/8/2007
100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES IN
2,738.52
CUSTODIAL SERVICES
154540
7070115772
1551.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CITY HALL GENERAL
2.738.52
2!7/2007 9:12:55
Page - 6
Business Unit
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,438.30.
154308
396465
5842.5514
CITY OF EDINA
YORK SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000
154309 -
395695
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
31.90
154310.
395696
Council Check Register
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
17.60
.154311
396463
2/8/2007 - 2/8/2007
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
. Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
293925
2/8/2007
154451.
120538 CREATIVE GRAPHICS
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
7,627.90 ..
31.95
NOTARY STAMP 00006056 154409
00034637 5410.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
21812007
293928 21812007 118490 DEEP ROCK WATER COMPANY
31.95
293926
2/8/2007
154254
100706 D.C. ANNIS SEWER INC.
5311 6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POOL OPERATION
1553.6556
510.00
ANNUAL MAINTENANCE 154523
54827 1470.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
HAND TOOLS
00001944 154365
510.00
1553.6556
TOOLS
293927
2/812007
DRIVER
102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING
971066
1553.6556
2!7/2007 9:12:55
Page - 6
Business Unit
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,438.30.
154308
396465
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
1,746.35
154309 -
395695
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
31.90
154310.
395696
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
17.60
.154311
396463
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
1,366.20
154312
396462
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
3,027.55
154451.
396461
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
7,627.90 ..
293930
21812007
293928 21812007 118490 DEEP ROCK WATER COMPANY
100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO.
154254
2293288
5311 6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POOL OPERATION
ART CENTER REVENUES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION.GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GRILL
GRILL
INSPECTIONS
4.79
WATER
4.79
293929
218/2007
120729 DEGE, DEE
75.00
CLASS REFUND
154400
013007
5101.4607
CLASS REGISTRATION
75.00
293930
21812007
100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO.
21.11
SOCKETS
00001422 154364
973493
1553.6556
TOOLS
177.91
HAND TOOLS
00001944 154365
974342
1553.6556
TOOLS
17.52
DRIVER
00001422 154366
971066
1553.6556
TOOLS
_
19.86
EXTENSION
00001422 154367
972574
1553.6556
TOOLS
199.02
BATTERY PACK
00001944 154581
974863
1553.6556
TOOLS
178.16-
CREDIT
154582
975679
1553.6556
TOOLS
257.26
293931
21812007
100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY
28.83
BAKERY
154541
236589
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
22.60
BAKERY
154542
236655
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
51.43
293932
21812007
100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY
4,898.23
JAN 2007
154543
020207
1495.4380
SURCHARGE
4,898.23
ART CENTER REVENUES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION.GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GRILL
GRILL
INSPECTIONS
2l) 9:12:55
Page - 7
Business Unit
ED ADMINISTRATION
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
CLUB HOUSE .
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
6,208.80 LEGAL
154677
1375417
1195.6131
PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL
LEGAL SERVICES
6,208.80
293938
218/2007
101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
293937 21812007 100739 EAGLE WINE
CITY G.
AA
R55CKREG LOG20000
276.79
154313
540356
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
312.84
154452
540364
5842.5513
Council Check Register
YORK SELLING
3,129.75
154453
540350
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
2/8@007
- 2/8/2007
154454
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
293933
218/2007
293939
102831 DEX MEDIA EAST
102340 EDMUNDS, LIZ
469.30
154255
308234903
5610.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
18.00
154256
308234941
5430.6188
TELEPHONE
.110.00
2/8/2007
154256
308234941
5420.6188
TELEPHONE
132.50
1,292.94
154256
308234941
5511.6188
TELEPHONE
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
729.80
1,292.94
293934
218/2007
218/2007
120726 - DIESEL & IMPORT AUTO/TRUCK SER
100851 ENCOMM MIDWEST LLC
382.40
REPAIRS
00005008 154410
13383
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
382.40
293935
2/8/2007
120728 DIESEL CAST WELDING
923.75
VALVE REBUILD
00005041 154411
155220
1553.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
923.75
293936
2/8/2007
100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP
2l) 9:12:55
Page - 7
Business Unit
ED ADMINISTRATION
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
CLUB HOUSE .
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
6,208.80 LEGAL
154677
1375417
1195.6131
PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL
LEGAL SERVICES
6,208.80
293938
218/2007
101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
293937 21812007 100739 EAGLE WINE
276.79
154313
540356
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
312.84
154452
540364
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
3,129.75
154453
540350
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1477.04
154454
537675
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR
5,196.42
293938
218/2007
101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
198.33
WINTER CATALOG AD
154412
5793
5822.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
198.33
WINTER CATALOG AD
154412
5793
5842.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
198.34
WINTER CATALOG AD
154412
5793
5862.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
595.00
293939
2/8/2007
102340 EDMUNDS, LIZ
98.35
154604
911
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
98.35
293940
2/8/2007
119119 ELECTRONIC RESOURCE CONTRACTOR
1,292.94
GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION
154596
13
4401.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
1,292.94
293941
218/2007
100851 ENCOMM MIDWEST LLC
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR
CITY OF EDINA
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
2/8/2007 -2/8/2007
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
10 309 06 FINAL PAYMENT 154530 020807 05457.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
TOOLS
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
MEETING EXPENSE
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
LAUNDRY
217/2007 9:12:55
Page - 8
Business Unit
WM -457 WELL #17
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
ENGINEERING GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
ENGINEERING GENERAL
WM-459 59TH ST RAW WATER LINE
WM-451 NINE MILE VILLAGE
DISTRIBUTION
10,309.06
293942
21812007
118120 ESCH CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY INC.
242.35
DIAMOND CUP WHEELS
00005031 154544
427487
1301.6556
242.35
293943
2/812007
100158 EXPLORE MINNESOTA GOLF ALLIANC
1,800.00
DUES
154545
020107
5410.6105
1,800.00
293944
218/2007
106035 FASTENAL COMPANY
25.42
FASTENERS
00001542 154368
MNTC288739
1646.6406
25.42
293945
2/8/2007
100756 FEDERAL EXPRESS
25.12
SHIPPING CHARGES
154492
8.651 -67618
1400.6406
20.09
SHIPPING CHARGES
154546
8 -650 -18233
1260.6406
45.21
293946
218/2007
113987 FISHER, PETER
495.00
TUITION REIMBURSEMENT
154678
020107
1470.6104
495.00
293947
21812007.
102727 FORCE AMERICA
20.77
ROCKER SWITCHES
00001937 154583
01270649
1553.6530
475.42
AUGER PULSE FEED
00001947 154584
01271599
1553.6530
323.21
PROP
00001986 154585
01271600
1553.6530
33.12-
CREDIT
00005184 154586
01270779
1553.6530
786.28
293948
218/2007
120733 FRAHM, JEFF
192.07
MNDOT CLASS
154493
020107
1260.6106
192.07
293949
21812007
102166 G.L. CONTRACTING INC.
12,798.67
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.6
154531
020807
05459.1705.30
96,448.57
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.6
154531
020807
05451.1705.30
109,247.24
293950
21812007
103029 GALETON GLOVES
1
r
25.90
GLOVES
00005021 154369
513009A
5913.6201
TOOLS
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
MEETING EXPENSE
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
LAUNDRY
217/2007 9:12:55
Page - 8
Business Unit
WM -457 WELL #17
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
ENGINEERING GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
ENGINEERING GENERAL
WM-459 59TH ST RAW WATER LINE
WM-451 NINE MILE VILLAGE
DISTRIBUTION
CITY Oi
.A
217,. .9:12:55
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Pager 9
2/8/2007
- 218/2007
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier /Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit .
290.15
GLOVES _
00005015 154370
512855A
5913.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
DISTRIBUTION
316.05
293951 21812007
118941 GLOBALSTAR USA'
55.28
R -91 PHONE
154547
296362
1470.6188
TELEPHONE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
55.28
293952 21812007
119771 GRAHAM PENN -CO CONSTRUCTION IN
3,654.65
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.9
154532
020807
05425.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
PLANT #2 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST
38,344.09
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.9
154532
020807
05426.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
PLANT #4 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST
70,881.74
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.9
154532
020807
05427.1705.30.
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
PLANT #3 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST
112,880.48
293953 2/8/2007
101103 GRAINGER
831.98
CABINET
00001934 154371
9280674079
1325.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES,
STREET NAME SIGNS
89.99
TOTES, LIDS
00005032 154372
9281976531
1551.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CITY HALL GENERAL
322.97
TOTES, BOXES, BINS
00005032 154373
9282553495
1552.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
79.19
SPANNER WRENCHES
00005007 154374
9279832183
5923.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
187.38
BATTERIES, BRUSHES
00005018 .154375
9281021247
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
41.48
154413
9277542164
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
41.48-
154414
.9280674087
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
245.95
EMERGENCY EXIT SIGN
00006074 154548
9281251612
5420.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CLUB HOUSE
1,757.46
293954. 2/812.007
102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
247.50
154314
88373
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
499.00
154455
88372
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
806.00
154605
88374
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1.552.50
293955 2/8/2007
100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
INC.
343.73
PHONES
00001914 154376
923213551
1646.6406.
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
343.73
293956 21812007
100784 GRAZZINI BROTHERS
8,127.25
- GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION
154597
FIVE
4401.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
GYMNASIUMS.- SVIEW & COMM CTR
8,127.25
293957 218/2007
100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO:
676.13
154315
540358
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
-
111.38
154316
540362
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
193.12
154317
540361
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
CITY OF EDINA 2!72007 9:12:55
RSSCKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register Page - 10
2/8/2007 - 2/8/2007
led A t D crl #ion Business Unit
Check # Date Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Sub ger ccoun es p
67.84
154318
540360
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING .
72.65
154319
540359
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
4,022.46
154456
540368
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD. LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
116.16
154457
540367
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
4,250.20
154458
540353
5862.5513
COST OF.GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,80-
154459
713880
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
474.51
154606
541302
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
4,908.52
154607
540366
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
2,737.27
154608
540365
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
17,628.44
29.29
PLASTIC PIPE
293958 21812007
101964 GUSTAVE A. LARSON CO.
5913.6406
29.29
46116
BLOWER KIT 00001924 154257
PLY0279864
5840.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING
WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT
WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
GRILL
DISTRIBUTION
CLUB HOUSE
461.16
293959
218/2007
102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS
60.66
REGISTER TAPE
154549
251782
5822.6512
60.66
293980
21812007
100797 HAWKINS INC.
3,268.73
CHEMICALS
00005913 154377
1029327
5915.6586
2,934.43
CHEMICALS
00005913 154679
1026177
5915.6586
6.203.16
293961
218/2007
100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD
29.29
PLASTIC PIPE
00005026 154258
4602640
5913.6406
29.29
293962
218/2007
101576 HEGGIES PIZZA
249.10
PIZZA
154550
162606
5421.5510
249.10
293963
2/8/2007
103753 HILLYARD INC.
131.29
MOP BUCKETS
00002189 154551
1999299
5620.6406
131.29
293964 -
2/8/2007
102483 HILTI INC.
110.46
BITS, CHISEL
00005119 154431
1602873009
5913.6406
110.46
293965
2/8/2007
100805 HIRSHFIELD'S
29.80
PRIMER
00006066 154415
003205143
5420.6406
PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING
WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT
WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COST OF GOODS SOLD
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
GRILL
DISTRIBUTION
CLUB HOUSE
CITY G_
AA
2fo. 9:12:55
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 11
21812007
-2/8/2007
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
29.80
293966
2/8/2007
104375 HOHENSTEINS INC.
1,304.50
154460
410326
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
445.90
154461
410328
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
77.85
154462
410329
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
1,828.25
293967
2/8/2007
101858 HOLIDAY INN HOTEL & SUITES
223.74
LODGING - MARK LIMBECK
154494
131160
1400.6104
CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
223.74
293968
21812007
101426 HUGHES, GORDON
346.29
MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT
154416
020107
1120.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
ADMINISTRATION
346.29
293969
2/8/2007
101468 IIMC
125.00
MEMBERSHIP - DEBRA MANGEN
154495
011807
1120.6105
DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS
ADMINISTRATION
125.00
293970
21812007
100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP.
90.23
SEALANT, VALVES, TUBING
00005000 154259
465966
05467.1705.31
MATERIALSISUPPLIES
WM-467 WELL #10, TRTMT PLNT #3
136.52
PVC TUBING, COIL -
00005029 154378
466476
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
21.02
SEALANT
00005000 154379
466377
05467. 1705.31
MATERIALS/SUPPLIES
WM-467 WELL 910, TRTMT PLNT #3
116.62
PVC, FITTINGS, CEMENT
00005020 154380
466272
05467.1705.31
MATERIALS/SUPPLIES
WM467 WELL #10, TRTMT PLNT #3
364.39
293971
218/2007
101732 INDUSTRIAL DOOR CO. INC.
90.00
DOOR REPAIR
154496
0119309 -IN
1400.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
90.00
293972
21812007
105894 INDUSTRIAL FLOOR MAINTENANCE 1
339.00
BROOMS
00005047 154552
22119
1310.6523
BROOMS
STREET CLEANING
339.00
293973
2/8/2007
120739 INFOTOUCH CONCIERGE
600.00
KIOSK ADVERTISING
154553
0585
5842.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
YORK SELLING
600.00
KIOSK ADVERTISING
154553
0585
5862.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
VERNON SELLING
1,200.00
293974
2/8/2007
101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY
23.44
GLUE, PVC
00005019 154260
4083644-01
05467.1705.31
MATERIALS /SUPPLIES
WM -467 WELL #10, TRTMT PLNT #3
CITY OF EDINA
217/2007 9:12:55
R55CKREG LOG20000
12
Council Check Register
Page -
2/8/2007
-21812007
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
106.16
MOTOR 00001781
154261
4078799-01
5840.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
129.60
293975 2/8/2007
102136 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SERVICE
18.33
LENS 00001272
.154262
0008479
1553.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
18.33
293976 218/2007
100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN
2,174.70
154320
1049128
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
7,310.61
154463
1049171
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
1,835.30
154464
.1049172
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
37.00
154465
1649173
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
2,731.10
154609
1049185
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
11,552,87
154610
1049180
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
32.00
154611
1049181
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
25.673.58
.
293979 2/8/2007
100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
199.00
154321
1203040
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
1,413.62
154322
1203039
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
364.14
154323
1203673
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
144.06
154324
1203035
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
5.33-
154325
331975
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
19.17-
154326
331974
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
4.83-
154466.
.333412.
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
6,25-
154467
333413
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
2.80-
154468
333415
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING .
14.63-
154469
333417
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
6.20-
154470
333796
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
13.57-
154471
333898
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
27.14-
154472
333899
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR.
YORK SELLING
17.08-
154473
333900
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
36.03
154612
1206389
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
442.50
154613.
1206387
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
760.30
154614
1206377
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5,102.30'
154615
1206395
5862,5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
28.48
154616
1206394
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
277.11
154617
1206392
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
32.31
154618
1206391
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
101.03
154619
1206386
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
65.29
154620
1206388
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
7,305.67
154621
1206390
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation
6,811.63
589.18
32.31
2,539.13
124.60
324.12
172.07
2,061.81
2,974.30
98.96
236.88
788.60
695.30
30.04 -
66.15-
4.12-
96.08-
60.06-
33.03-
33,314.25
293980 2/8/2007 100357 JOHNSON, DAN
225.17 2007 UNIFORM PURCHASE
225.17
293981 21812007 102719 JOHNSON, PHILLIP
74.64 MEDIA SOFTWARE
74.64
154417 013007 1646.6201
154402 013007. 5125.6406
2/].
Page -
Subledger Account Description
CITY G.
1A
YORK SELLING
Council Check Register
YORK SELLING
2/8/2007
-2/8/2007
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
154622
1206381
5842.5512
154623
1206378
5842.5512
154624
1206382
5842.5515
154625
1206383
5842.5512
154626
1206385
5842.5515
154627
1206376
5842.5513
154628
1206380
5842.5513.
154629
1206379
5842.5513
154630
1206384
5842.5513
154631
1206373
5822.5513
154632
1206372
5822.5513
154633
1206374
5822.5513
154634
1206375
5822.5512
154635
331487
5842.5513
154636
333170
5842.5513
154637
331428
5842.5513
154638
334002
5842.5513
154639
331427
5842.5513
154640
333416
5842.5513
154417 013007 1646.6201
154402 013007. 5125.6406
2/].
Page -
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
LAUNDRY
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
MEDIA STUDIO
9:12:55
13
293982
21812007
104369 KARKHOFF, NANCY
171.43
UNIFORM PURCHASE 154497 020107 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
171.43
293983
2/8/2007
105806 KELLINGTON CONSTRUCTION INC.
3,325.00
GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION 154598 FIVE 4401.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR
3,325.00
293984
218/2007
105171 KEYS WELL DRILLING CO.
1,302.45
PUMP REPAIR 00005198 154680 2005066 -6 5911.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER
1,302.45
293985
21812007
101185 KNUTSON, KAREN
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
218/2007 -2/8/2007
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
2,289.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 154670 012507 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
. , I
217/2007 9:12:55
Page - 14
Business Unit
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
5600.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT EB /CL BALANCE SHEET
4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9DONATION
1325.6406
2,289.00
STREET NAME SIGNS
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
293986 21812007
1553.6530
115852 LAND EQUIPMENT INC.
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
18,642.83
BOBCAT LOADER W /ATTACHMENTS)0002308 154681
58119
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
18,642.83
TOOLS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1553.6530
293987 2/8/2007
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
120734 LAW ENFORCEMENT TECHNOLOGY
GRO
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1400.6710.
511.20
K9 TRACKER SOFTWARE
154524
11324
GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR
511.20
293988 21812007
100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
282.23
HEX NUTS
00001913 154263
5234204
284.26
SCREWS
00001927 154264
5238849
292.40
TIRE GAUGE, AIR HOSE
00001913 154265
5234203
26.10
DRILL BITS, SEALANT
00001928 154432
5243680
38.97
DRILL BITS, SEALANT
.00001928 154432-
5243680
352.79
DRILL BITS, SEALANT
00001928 154432
5243680
268.37
GASKET MAKER, SAW BLADES
00001928 154433
5243681
478.32
SCREWS, NUTS, WASHERS
00005006 154434.
5247995
2,023.44
293989 2/8/2007
106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC.
12,043.00
DIGITAL LOGGER/SOFTWARE UPGFM00303-8 154682
34295A
12,043.00
293990 21812007
102616 LUND MARTIN CONSTRUCTION INC.
4,999.00
GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION
154599
006
4,999.00
293991 218/2007
100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
597.21
BLADES
00005040 154587
2071171
96.93
BOLT
00001936 154588
2071048
22.61
LUBRICATING HOSE
00005145 154589
2071011
218.38-
CREDIT
154590
6593
498.37
293992 2/8/2007
100868 MARK VII SALES
21.50
154327
152844
45.65
154328
.152843
2,042.90
154329
152358
.03
154330
152116
. , I
217/2007 9:12:55
Page - 14
Business Unit
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
5600.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT EB /CL BALANCE SHEET
4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9DONATION
1325.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET NAME SIGNS
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
1301.6556
TOOLS -
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
1553.6556
TOOLS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1553.6585
ACCESSORIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1400.6710.
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
4401.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
CITY Co.
AA
2l., 912:55
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 15
2/82007
-2/8/2007
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
2,254.65
154331
152117
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
110.25
154332
152118
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
1,401.45
154333
149848
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
444.15
154334
151896
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
4,374.35
154641
152842
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
3,564.72
154642
154537
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
3,045.50
154643
154357
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
17,305.15
293993 2182007
103280 MARLIN COMPANY, THE
545.16
COMMUNICATIONS PROGRAM
00005147 154418
386781
1280.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD
545.16
293994 2182007 -
100869 MARTIN- MCALLISTER
350.00
PERSONNEL EVALUATION
154554
5332
1550.6121
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
350.00
293995 21812007
101483 MENARDS
48.68
HANDCRAFT WB AS, BRUSHES
00001926 154266
21
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
30.52
MEASURING TAPES, BOARD
00005038 154435
1463
1301.6556
TOOLS
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
56.40.
LUMBER, BATTERIES
00002351 154683
93367
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
135.60
293996 21812007
100882 MERIT SUPPLY
542.09
CLEANING SUPPLIES
00001922 154382
71154
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES.
BUILDING MAINTENANCE.
106.23
PAINT
00005024 154436
71244
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
198.31
DEGREASER
00005014 154437
71215
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
1,909.81
POLYLINERS, SEWER BLOCS
00005001 154438
71216
4090.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET REVOLVING
2,756.44
293997 218/2007
102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS
76.50
OFFICIATING FEES
154591
3098
4077.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
76.50
293998 2/82007
100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
3,316.50
JAN 2007
154555
020207
1495.4307
SAC CHARGES
INSPECTIONS
3,316.50
293999. 218.2007
102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAT
16:79
CAP ASSEMBLY
00001945 154267
451316FOW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS,
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
16.79
CITY OF EDINA
217/2007 9:12:55
R55CKREG LOG20000
Page - 16
Council Check Register
2/8/2007 — 218/2007
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No "
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
294000
218/2007
102550 MFAPC
35.00
DUES RENEWAL 154525
020107
1470.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
35.00
294001
21812007
100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA EAGAN
383.60
154335
0128077216
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
256,80
154336
0168415422
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
640.40
294002
2/8/2007
100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER &
1,620.00
WATER SERVICE REPAIR 00001778 .154268
32938
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
1,260.00
GATE VALVE REPAIR 00001779 154269.
32939
5913.6180.
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
2,880.00
294003
' 2/8/2007
101746 MINNESOTA COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASS
71.36
CRIMINAL ELEMENTS BOOKS 154498
18044
1400.6405
BOOKS & PAMPHLETS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
71.36
294004
218/2007
101899 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
25.00,
HAZARDOUS CHEMICAL FEE 154270
2706000072006M-
5310.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
POOL ADMINISTRATION
6624
25.00
.294005
218/2007
101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT
1,863.75
VALVE BOX 00005196 154440.
0202432
5913.6530
REPAIR PARTS
DISTRIBUTION
1,548.51
METER BATTERIES 00001768 154441
0202221
5917.6530
REPAIR PARTS
METER REPAIR
499.83
METER COUPLINGS 00005195 154442
0201021
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
3,912.09
294006
2/6/2007
101459 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARKAS
135.00
AQUATICS CONFERENCE 154271
013007
5310.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
POOL ADMINISTRATION
135.00
294007
2/8/2007
101556 MINNESOTA SHREDDING LLC.
229.00
RECORD SHREDDING 154499
253187751
1400.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
POLICE'DEPT. GENERAL
229.00
29.4008
2/8/2007
101559 MINNESOTA STATE FIRE CHIEFS AS
1,100.00
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 154508
50411
7410.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
PSTF ADMINISTRATION
1,100.00
294009
2/812r
112769 MINUTI -OGLE CO. INC.
CITY k
NA
21. 9:12:55
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 17
218/2007
-2/812007
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
1,189.40
GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION
154600
SEVEN
4401.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR
1,189.40
294010
2/812007
100898 MINVALCO
43.81
WALL SENSORS
00001919 154273
581647
1551.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CITY HALL GENERAL
43.81
294011
21812007
101753 MISSION - SERVICE SUPPLY INC
248.05
TAPES FOR COUNCIL
154500
121703
1100.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CITY COUNCIL
248.05
294012
21812007
100159 MOOERS PRINTING INC.
104.37
BUSINESS CARDS
00003737 154526
4702
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
104.37
294013
21812007.
105921 MSTMA
15.00
MEMBERSHIP FEES
00001846 154419
020107
1642.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
FIELD MAINTENANCE
15.00
294014
2/812007
117246 MT GLOBAL
300.50
154337
2459
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
300.50
294015
2/8/2007
101390 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY
SERVICES
317.62
WADER BOOTS
00001898 154272
394578
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
317.62
294016
218/2007
100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO.
292.00
154644
41586
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
292.00
294017
21812007
103632 NEXT DAY GOURMET /SUPERIOR PROD
278.91
COFFEE URNS
00006073 154556
8379725
5420.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CLUB HOUSE
540.04
TABLES
00006078 154557
8379917
5420.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CLUB HOUSE
86.43
SIGNS
00006068 154558
8379916
5421.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GRILL
905.38
294018
2/8/2007
104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS
44.39
154274
679000121 -051
1120.6188
TELEPHONE
ADMINISTRATION
76.63
154274
679000121 -051
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
245.92
154274
679000121 -051
2210.6188
TELEPHONE
COMMUNICATIONS
382.21
154501
909583317 -062
1400.6188
TELEPHONE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
2/7/2007 9:12:55
CITY OF
EDINA
R55CKREG LOG20000
Page - 18
Council Check Register
218/2007
-2/8/2007
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
237.28
154559
737969523-032
1495.6188
TELEPHONE
INSPECTIONS
397.47
154560
757391129-050
1470.6151
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
603.29
154684
737969523-031
1495.6188
TELEPHONE
INSPECTIONS '
1,987.19
294019
2/8/2007
102551 NFPA
214.95
CARBON MONOXIDE BROCHURES 00003732 154527
3729692Y
1470.6614
FIRE PREVENTION
FIRE DEPT, GENERAL
214.95
294020
2/8/2007
100712 NORTHERN WATER WORKS SUPPLY
20.77
BATTERIES . 00005152 154439
501067231.001
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
20.77
294021
2/8/2007
100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY
155.56
DRAFTING TAPE, PALETTE PADS 00009104 154420
33908200
5120.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP
155.56
294022
218/2007
100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO.
147.40
RECAPS 00001806 154275
NW- 105545
1553.6583
TIRES & TUBES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
17.95
DISMOUNT TIRE 00001806 154276.
NW- 105565
1553.6583
TIRES & TUBES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
165.35
294023
2/8/2007
103578 OFFICE DEPOT
155.98
PRINTER TONER 154561
371924638-001
. 5610.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
ED ADMINISTRATION
.
155.98
294024
2/8/2007
100936 OLSEN COMPANIES
383.78
6° VISE 00005020 154277
430905
1325.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET NAME SIGNS -
383.78
294025
21812007
100347. PAUSTIS & SONS
960.41
154338
8135162 -IN
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
60TH ST SELLING .
2,265.27
154474
8135160 -IN
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING .
3,944.00
154645
8135165 -IN
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING.
7,169.68.
294026
218/2007
100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS
645.00
IRRIGATION WORK 00005906 154562
011707
04336.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
STS -336 70TH ST & LEE VALLEY
2,480.00
REMOVE RETAINING WALL 00005905 154563
1/17107
04336.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
STS- 336 70TH ST & LEE VALLEY
3,325.00
294027
2181'
119372 PETSMART 9463
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation
26.12 DOG FOOD
26.12
CITY Co. NA
Council Check Register
2/812007 - 2/8/2007
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No
00003108 154502 T-6336 4607.6406
Subledger Account Description
GENERAL SUPPLIES
2b. 9:12:55
Page - 19
Business Unit
EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION
294029 2/8/2007
100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
147.91
154339
2423197
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
708.58
154340
2423196
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
703.92
154341
2423198
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
310.06
154475
2423709
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
17.34-
154476
3353527
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
13.32-
154477
3353528
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
8.00-
154478
3353529
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
8.67-
154479
3353585
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,793.55
154646
2425683
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
5,608.82
154647
2425682
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
486.18
154648
2425678
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
628.24
154649
2425684
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
963.67
154650
2425680
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
648.24
154651
2425677
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
4,451.30
154652
2425679
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,242.89
154653
2425681
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
299.94
154654
2425676
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
3,700.72
154655
2425674
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
250.64
154656
2425675
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
10.67-
154657
3354590
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
6.00-
154658
3354591
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
10.67-
154659
3354593
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
21,869.99
294030 21812007
101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY
100.00
PHOTO SHOOT PORTRAITS
00006098 154564
010607
5410.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
100.00
294031 21812007
100819 POPP TELECOM
329.55
NEW PHONE STATION
00006432 154565
84269
5420.6188
TELEPHONE
CLUB HOUSE
.47-
CREDIT
154566
1398
5420.6188
TELEPHONE
CLUB HOUSE
329.08
294032 2/8/2007
106152 POWERPLAN
561.65
MUFFLER, GASKET KIT, PARTS
00001978 154443
P15864
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
561.65
294033 2/8/2007
108681 PRAIRIE ELECTRIC COMPANY
CITY OF EDINA 2/7/2007 9:12:55
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register Page - 20
218/2007 - 2182007
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit
5,250.32 ELECTRICAL WORK CHANGE ORDES0007139 154421 15590 4401.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR
5,250.32
294034 21812007
100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY
306.15
154342
540352
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
169.23
154343
540357
5822.6513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
406.59
154480
540363
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
881.97
294035 21812007
106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY
614.98
ROLL TOWEL, TISSUE
00002211 154567.
3906
5620.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
614.98
294037 218/2007
100971 QUALITY WINE
164.40
154344
816200-00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
762,35
154345
817637 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
442.60
154346
817435-00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,369.13
154347
817861 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
632.98
154348
817942 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
240.79
154349
817693-00
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
7.50-
154350
811849-00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
11.56-
154351
814002 -00
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
29,15
154352
813955-00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
335.00-
154353
812070-00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
180.00-
154353
812070 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
165.00-
154353
812070-00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
789.67-
154354
812023-00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
595.17-
154354
812023-00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
503.16-
154354
812023 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
56.00-
154355
814179-00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
80.58-
154356
813769 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,202,92
154481
817699-00
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
715.64
154482
817094 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
180.30
154483
817860 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,414.24
154484
817434 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
703.94
154660
817692 -00
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
2,063.10
154661
817672 -00
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
872.68
154662
817436-00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
408.70
154663
817015-00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
8,420.98
294038 21812 101965 QWEST
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY L AA
Council Check Register
2/82007 -2/8/2007
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
121.47
952 927 -8861
154568
8861 -1/07
1550.6186
TELEPHONE
54.74
952 929-0297
154569
0297 4/07
4090.6168
TELEPHONE
83.49
952 929 -9549
154570
9549 -1/07
5841.6188
TELEPHONE
54.89
154592
012807
5911.6188
TELEPHONE
57.57
154592
012807
1628.6188
TELEPHONE
82.89
154592
012807
5861.6188
TELEPHONE
95.98
154592
012807
5821.6188
TELEPHONE
98.96
154592
012807
5841.6188
TELEPHONE
106.05
154592
012807
1470.6188
TELEPHONE
161.08
154592
012807
5610.6188
TELEPHONE
163.04
154592
012807
1622.6188
TELEPHONE
231.35
154592
012807
1646.6188
TELEPHONE
262.97
154592
012807
5932.6188
TELEPHONE
265.54
154592
012807
5511.6188
TELEPHONE
2,407.70
154592
012807
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
4,247.72
294039 21812007
104299 QWEST
194.65
CABLE REPAIRS
00005143 154381
A006404
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
194.65
294040 2182007
113422 RAKE PUBLISHING INC..
200.00
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING
154580
9889
5822.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
200.00
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING
154580
9889
5842.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
200.00
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING
154580
9889
5862.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
600.00
294041 21812007.
100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO.
88.86
SOFTENER SALT
154422
00187865
1551.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
88.86
294042 2/8/2007
102040 MG, JAMES
15.00
TRAINING EXPENSE -
154503
013007
1400.6107
MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE
21.49
TRAINING EXPENSE
154503
013007
1400.6104.
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
36.49
294043 2182007
100988 SAFETY KLEEN
133.08
PARTS WASHER CHANGE OUT
00005153 154383
0033350057
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
133.08
294044 2/8/2007
104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP.
584.91
QUARTERLY MAINT
00005148 154384
8101733620
1375.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2/. 9:12:55
Page'- 21
Business Unit
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
STREET REVOLVING
YORK OCCUPANCY
PUMP & LIFT STATION.OPER
SENIOR CITIZENS
VERNON OCCUPANCY
50TH ST, OCCUPANCY
YORK OCCUPANCY
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
ED ADMINISTRATION
SKATING & HOCKEY
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
GENERAL STORM SEWER
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
DISTRIBUTION
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
CITY HALL GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
PARKING RAMP -
CITY OF EDINA
2/7/2007 9:12:55 '
R55CKREG LOG20000
Page - 22
Council Check Register
218/2007
- 2182007
Check #
Data.
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # - Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
552.48
QUARTERLY MAINT
154385
8101732565
1628.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
SENIOR CITIZENS -
1,137.39
294045
2/8/2007
104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC.
117.00
SIGNS FOR COUNCIL CHAMBERS
154504
38478
1100.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CITY COUNCIL
262.50
SIGNS FOR COUNCIL CHAMBERS
154505
38432
1100.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CITY COUNCIL
379.50
294046
2/8/2007
101342 SOCCER EXPRESS
260.00
POLO SHIRTS
00001858 154685..
0070
1646.6201
LAUNDRY
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
260.00
294047
2182007
120731 SODERLUND, LYNNE
53.20
ART WORK SOLD
154671
013007
5101.4413'
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
53.20
294048
2182007
102935 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION INC
300.00
PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE
00006340 154423
58082
5421.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
GRILL
300.00
294049
2/812007
101004 SPS COMPANIES
34.57
BUSHINGS, PVC PARTS
00001930 154278
S1587535.001
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
34.57
294050
2/8/2007
120732 ST PATRICKS CHURCH
135.00
RENTAL REFUND
154506
020107
1600.4722.05
FIELD USER FEE
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
135.00
294051
2/8/2007
103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC
-
346.15
BATTERIES, CORES
00001940 154279
SI53056
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
36.52
CAPSCREW BOLTS
00001270 154280
SI53032
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
517.50
CUTTING EDGES
00005156 154444
S153075
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
900.17
294052
2182007
105387 ST. PAUL LINOLEUM & CARPET CO.
3,211.00
GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION
154601
ONE
4401.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR
3,211.00
294053
2182007
119671 STERLING SUPPLY INC.
52.72
SILICA SAND
00005033 154445
. 56970
5912.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDINGS
52.72
CITY L
4A
21, 9:12:55
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 23
2/8/2007
- 218/2007
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subtedger Account Descriptlon
Business Unit
294054
21812007
117992 STRINGER BUSINESS SYSTEMS
45.76
COPIER MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 154507
1216624
1400.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
45.76
294055
2/8/2007
101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
9.04
SWITCH
00001977 154281
474289CVW
1553:6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
9.04
294056
218/2007
100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS
32.18
PUBLISH PH NOTICE
00014798 154509
940501
1120.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
ADMINISTRATION
171.60
PUBLISH BUDGET SUMMARY
00014798 154510
940500
1120.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
ADMINISTRATION
39.33
AD FOR BID
00014798 154511
938785
1120.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
ADMINISTRATION
64.35
AD FOR BID
00014798 154512
938784
1120.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
ADMINISTRATION
135.85
PUBLISH ORD 2007 -1
00014798 154513
942543
1120.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
ADMINISTRATION
91.16
PUBLISH NOTICE
00014798 154514
942542
1120.6120
ADVERTISING LEGAL
ADMINISTRATION
534.47
294057
218/2007
101.910 SUNGARI) HTE INC.
677.20
POLICE HARDWARE/SOFTWARE
154519
8467
4608.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
POLICE COMPUTER SYSTEM
50,426.00
PD HARDWARE/SOFTWARE
154686
8331 -LH
4608.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
POLICE COMPUTER SYSTEM
95,281.49
PD HARDWARE/SOFTWARE
154687
8303 -LH
4608.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
POLICE COMPUTER SYSTEM
274,050.79
PD HARDWAREISOFTWARE
154688
8355 -LH
4608.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
POLICE COMPUTER SYSTEM
420,435.48
294058
218/2007
118750 SUNRAM CONSTRUCTION INC.
2,652.87
PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.3
154533
020807
01101.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
54TH BLVD BEAUTIFICATION
2,652.87
294059
21812007
101167 SUPERIOR FORD
24,216.00
2007 FORD EXPEDITION
00003084 154515
18762
1400.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
24,216.00
294060
218/2007
110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO
15.00
PHONE SERVICE
00005159 154446
17010
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
15.00
294061
2/8/2007
102300 TCALMC
170.00
TRAINING CLASSES
00005133 154282
012307
1281.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
TRAINING
170.00
294062
218/2007
101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
290.25
154357
435290
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
CITY OF EDINA
2/7/2007 9:12:55
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 24
2/8/2007
-2/8/2007
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier I Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
4,520.75
154358
435665
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
137.70
154485
436274
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
4,881.90
154486
436273
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
9,830.60
294063 -
2/8/2007
120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC.
500.00
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING
154424
35833
5822.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
50TH ST SELLING
500.00
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING
154424
35833
5842.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
YORK SELLING
500.00
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING
154424
35833
5862.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
VERNON SELLING
1,500.00
294064
2/8/2007
101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY
118.09
WELDING GASES 00001943
154386
153117
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
118.09
294065
218/2007
118277 TRUE FITNESS TECHNOLOGY INC.
241.22
BIKE PARTS 00002221
154571
313054
5620.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EDINBOROUGH PARK
241.22
294066
2/8/2007
102255 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO
123.16
OXYGEN 00003649
.154572
579259
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
123.16
294067
218/2007
102104 UNDIS, PAT
2,289.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
164672
012507.
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
2,289.00
294068
2/8/2007
101053 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY
521.74
WIRE 00005005
154447
321150
05467.1705.31
MATERIALS/SUPPLIES
WM-467 WELL #10, TRTMT PLNT #3
521.74
294069
21=007
101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
620.00
RECERTIFICATION FEES
154573
020207
1260.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
ENGINEERING GENERAL
620.00
294070
2/8/2007
120716 UP SHOW
40.00
FOOD SHOW
154528
020107
1600.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
40.00
294071
218/2007
100668 URS CORPORATION
8,948.00
COMP PLAN CONSULTING
154689
2654085
1140.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PLANNING
8.948.00
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY I,. AA
Council Check Register
2/8/2007 -2/8/2007
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
294072 21812007 101354 USGA
100.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 00006840 154574 R281-3010 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
2b 9:12:55
Page - 25
Business Unit
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
100.00
294073
21812007
101058 VAN PAPER CO.
186.00
KNIVES, PLATES, TISSUE 00001832 154283
024456-00
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
476.18
LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 154284
024644 -00
5842.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
YORK SELLING
180.77
LINERS, ROLL TOWEL, TISSUE 00009103 154425
023889 -00
5111.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
842.95
294074
21812007
101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC.
504.81
BATTERIES 00001267 154285
11507018
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
504.81
294075
2/8/2007
101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY
359.42
CIRCUIT BREAKER 00005024 154286
1542397
7411.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PSTF OCCUPANCY
359.42
294076
2/8/2007
101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER
18.53
SAFETY GLASSES 00005139 154448
195766
5913.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
DISTRIBUTION
90.50
SAFETY JACKET 00005139 154448
195766
1301.6201
LAUNDRY
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
109.03
294077
21812007.
120627 VISTAR OF MINNESOTA
508.27
FOOD 00002369 154575
20122572
5630.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
CENTENNIAL LAKES
508.27
294078
2/8/2007
120725 WARNERS STELLMN
670.90
PD REFRIGERATOR 00004190 154426
16CITY0838
44005.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
CITY HALL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS
670.90
294079
21812007
103309 WERGES, GREG
78.94
2007 UNIFORM PURCHASE 154593
020207
1646.6201
LAUNDRY
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
78.94.
294080
21812007
105566 WERRE & BETZEN SALES INC.
621.84
PGA SHOW EXPENSES 154576
1465
5440.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
621.84
294081
21812007
120730 WEXLER, MARLENE
106.00
CLASS REFUND 154401
013007
5101.4607
CLASS REGISTRATION
ART CENTER REVENUES
CITY OF EDINA
2!7/2007 9:12:55
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 28
2/8/2007
- 2/8/2007,
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
106.00
294082 21812007
101033 WINE COMPANY, THE
909.75
154487
159495-00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD NNE'
VERNON SELLING
1,066.95
154664
159443-00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING .
862.35
154665
159441 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
32.00-
154666
159349 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE . "
YORK SELLING
2.807.05
294083 218/2007
101312 WINE MERCHANTS
1,496.85
154667
181814
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
552.43
154668.
181813
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
2,049.28
294084 2/8/2007
102228 WOOLDRIDGE, MARY
538.40
PGA SHOW EXPENSES
154577
020107
5440.6106
MEETING EXPENSE,
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
538.40
294085 21812007
101726 XCEL ENERGY
30,668.38
51- 4621797 -2
154287
98122339
1321.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
225.27
51- 5938955.6
154288
97845394
4086.6185
LIGHT & POWER
AQUATIC WEEDS
1,681.09
51- 5547446 -1
154289
98148050
1628.6185
LIGHT & POWER
SENIOR CITIZENS
60.95
51- 4420190 -3
154290
97647717.
1321.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
989.91
51- 5107681
154291
97821664
5111.6185.
LIGHT & POWER
ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
128.77
51- 4197645 -8
154292
97808746
1322.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
1,798.45
51- 6223269 -1
154293
97852373
5210.6185
LIGHT & POWER
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
56.68
51- 6692497-0
154294
97860162
1460.6185
LIGHT & POWER
CIVILIAN DEFENSE
194.78
514827232 -6
154295
98137154
5311.6185
LIGHT &. POWER
POOL OPERATION
460.20
51- 5005454 -3
154387
97829393
5913.6185
LIGHT & POWER
DISTRIBUTION
19,156.51
51- 4888627 -1
154388
98127704
5511.6185
LIGHT & POWER
ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS
58.81
51. 4621797 -2
154389
97980749
1321.6185
LIGHT & POWER
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
7.86
51- 6541084 -2
154390
98013210
1646.6185
LIGHT & POWER
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
164.76
51- 4156445-0
15,091
98277574
5932.6185
LIGHT & POWER
GENERAL STORM SEWER .
163.77
51- 6229265 -9
154392
98318942
1481.6185
LIGHT & POWER
YORK FIRE STATION
1,123.60
51- 6229265 -9
154392
98318942
1470.6185
LIGHT & POWER
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
33.64
51- 6892224 -5
154393
98026327
1330.6185
LIGHT & POWER
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
7.87
51- 6050164 -2
154394
98002091
4086.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
AQUATIC WEEDS
348.06
51- 6046826-0
154395
98317801
5422.6185
LIGHT & POWER
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
2,160.22
51 -4159265 -8
154516
97960558
7411.6185
LIGHT & POWER .
PSTF OCCUPANCY
1;149.82
51- 5847121 -5
154594
98835515
5914.6185
LIGHT & POWER
TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR
60,639.40
CITY Ot
� A
2n. 9:12:55
R55CKREG LOG20000
Page - 27
Council Check
Register
218,2007
— 2/8/2007
,
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
. Inv No
Account No
Subledger
Account Descilpflon
Business Unit
294086
2IW2007
100588 XEROX CORPORATION
476.11.
JAN USAGE - ADMIN
00004060 154517
022826586
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
13129
JAN USAGE - PARK & REC
00004322 154518
022826588
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
159.17.
JAN USAGE - BLDIENG
00004322 154595
023057308
1550.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
766.57
294087
21812007
104324 YOUNGBLOOD LUMBER CO.
212.04
COUNTER MATERIAL
00005141 154578
528244
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
212.04
294088
21812007
120099 Z WINES USA LLC
919.84
154669
1135
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
919.84
29408.9
21812007
120745 MORTON BUILDINGS INC.
3,000.00
. DOWN PAYMENT
154779
020507
7411.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
PSTF OCCUPANCY
3,000.00
1,117,402.82
Grand Total
Payment Instrument Totals
Check Total
1,117,402.82
Total Payments
1,117,402.82
2/7/2007 9:14:50
CITY OF EDINA
R55CKSUM LOG20000
Page
Council Check Summary
.2/82007 - 2/82007
Company
Amount
01000 GENERAL FUND
152,643.37
02100 CDBG FUND
7,790.00
02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND
245.92
04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND
455,80824
05100 ART CENTER FUND
6,310.83
05200 GOLF DOME FUND
1,798.45
05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND
359.57
05400 GOLF COURSE FUND
6,551.85
05500 ICE ARENA FUND
19,554.55
05600 EDINBOROUGWCENT LAKES FUND
22,021.35
05800 LI000R FUND
177,843.48
05900 UTILITY FUND
256,103.04.
.05930 STORM SEWER FUND.
3,752.73
,07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND
6,619.64
Report Totals
1,117,40212
We confirm to the best of our kx edga
and belief, that these claims
comply in all material respects
of �
�
of
prooedt�s
A
Moira
city
CITY OF
A
2/14 10:59:38
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 1
2115/2007
- 2115/2007
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
294090
2/15/2007
118536 A &B AUTO ELECTRIC INC.
122.30
COILS, BRUSH SET 00001988 154780
49043
1553.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
EOUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
122.30
294091
211512007
100715 ACCLAIM BENEFITS
1,199.60
FSA - ADMIN AND RENEWAL 155076
362740
1550.6200
INSURANCE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
410.00
FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCT ADMIN 155145
362197
1550.6040
HOSPITALIZATION
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
158.40
DEC 2006 HRA ADMIN 155146
362592
1551.6040
HOSPITALIZATION
CITY HALL GENERAL
196.00
COBRA ADMIN 155147
362451
1551.6040
HOSPITALIZATION
CITY HALL GENERAL
1,964.00
294092
2/15/2007
102191 ADVANCED GRAPHIC SYSTEMS INC.
1,372.55
TONER CARTRIDGES 00003198 154927
INV00074267
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
1,372.55
294093
2/15/2007
102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES
434.25
CEMENT 00005917 154690
4180131
5422.6518
BLACKTOP
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
434.25
294094
211512007
105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY
164.95
COFFEE 154928
125045
1628.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SENIOR CITIZENS
164.95
294095
211512007
100621 ALBINSON REPROGRAPHICS
46.01
LAMINATING 00005142 155077
C577214
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
46.01
294096
2115/2007
100058 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES 0894
33,958.00
RECYCLING 154929
780955
5952.6183
RECYCLING CHARGES
RECYCLING
33,958.00
294097
2115/2007
101115 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER
63.00
154930
16813 -1/07
5421.6201
LAUNDRY
GRILL
94.53
154931
3695 -1/07
5210.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
566.89
154932
6200 -1/07
1470.6201
LAUNDRY
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
210.45
154933
35314 -1/07
5861.6201
LAUNDRY
VERNON OCCUPANCY
120.79
154934
35320 -1/07
5841.6201
LAUNDRY
YORK OCCUPANCY
56.91
154935
35334 -1/07
5821.6201
LAUNDRY
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
454.79
154936
46 -1/07
1551.6201
LAUNDRY
CITY HALL GENERAL
89.87
154937
59056 -1/07
1470.6201
LAUNDRY
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
1,657.23
2114/2007 10:59:38
Page- 2
Business Unit
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
COURTNEY BALL FIELD #4
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
PSTF OCCUPANCY
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
YORK FIRE STATION
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
LITTER REMOVAL
VERNON OCCUPANCY
SENIOR CITIZENS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
YORK OCCUPANCY
CLUB HOUSE
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
CITY HALL GENERP
CITY OF EDINA
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
2/15/2007
- 2115/2007
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
294098 2115/2007
101601 AMUNDSON, ERIK
52.21
UNIFORM PURCHASE
154982
020807
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
1,500.00
TUITION REIMBURSEMENT
155126
020807.
1400.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
1,552.21
294099 2/1512007
102171 ANDERSON - JOHNSON ASSOCIATES
1,530.00
ARCHITECT SERVICES
154691
061600107
47042.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
1,530.00
294100 2/15/2007
102470 AON RISK SERVICES INC. OF MN
6,589.00
PREMIUM
155072
6100000089025
1550.6200
INSURANCE
6,589.00
PREMIUM
155073
6100000089478
1550.6200
INSURANCE
13,178.00
294101 2/15/2007
101977 ARCH WIRELESS
10.97
PAGER
154781
060960838
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
10.97
294102 2/15/2007
119645 ARCSTONE INFORMATION SERVICES
30.00
EBROCHURE 00006105 154983
11375
5410.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
-
30.00
294103 2/1512007
114475 ARMOR SECURITY INC.
145.00
SMOKE DETECTOR MAINTENANCE 00001856 155078
109911
1646.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
145.00
294104 2/1512007
102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS
123.48
WASTE DISPOSAL
154692
020107
7411.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
33.95
155129
2/01/2007
5821.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
51.71
155129
2/01/2007
1481.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
59.66
155129
2101/2007
5210.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
69.22
155129
2/01/2007
5422.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
71.82
155129
2/01/2007
5111.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
83.11
155129
210112007
1645.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
96.53
155129
2101/2007
5861.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
99.69
155129
2/01/2007
1628.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
104.52
155129
2101/2007
1470.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
118.14
155129
2101/2007
5841.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
184.28
155129
2101/2007
5420.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
191.30
155129
2/01/2007
1552.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
191.31
155129
2/01/2007
1301.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
255.00
165129
2101/2007
1551.6182'
RUBBISH REMOVAL
2114/2007 10:59:38
Page- 2
Business Unit
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
COURTNEY BALL FIELD #4
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
PSTF OCCUPANCY
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
YORK FIRE STATION
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
LITTER REMOVAL
VERNON OCCUPANCY
SENIOR CITIZENS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
YORK OCCUPANCY
CLUB HOUSE
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
CITY HALL GENERP
CITY OF
A
2/14. 10:59:38
R55CKREG LOG20000
.
Council Check Register
Page - 3
2/15/2007 -- 2/15/2007
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
336.51
155129
2/01/2007
5511.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
453.13
155129
2/01/2007
5620.6182
RUBBISH REMOVAL
EDINBOROUGH PARK
2,523.36
294105 2/15/2007
100269 AT &T
2.86
ACCT 053 3610704 001
154693
013107
1400.6188
TELEPHONE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
2.86
294106 2115/2007
101428 AWWA
74.50
PIPE DESIGN & INSTALL BOOK
154984
020707
1260.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ENGINEERING GENERAL
74.50
294107 2/15/2007
100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO.
13,607.30
SEWER MODELING
155148
2327G13 -14
5923.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
405.89
STORMWATER MGMT
155149
2327354 -144
5932.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GENERAL STORM SEWER
13,819.50
SEWER MODELING
155150
2327G13 -13
5923.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
27,832.69
294108 2/15/2007
101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION
170.60
154850
39831200
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
329.60
154851
39856100
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
119.51
154852
42591900
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
937.95
154853
39856300
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
216.40
154854
39900900
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,774.06
294109 211512007
117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC.
765.00
SNOW REMOVAL
154694
12467
7411.6136
SNOW & LAWN CARE
PSTF OCCUPANCY
765.00
294110 2/1512007
100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS
89.39
OFFICE SUPPLIES
154695
WO- 438081 -1
1600.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
3.49
DIVIDER TABS
00005236 154782
OE- 97067 -1
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
23.86
OFFICE SUPPLIES
00005236 154783
W0 -438148 -1
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
114.04
OFFICE SUPPLIES
154938
OE- 95916 -1
1400.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
167.91
OFFICE SUPPLIES
00003103 154939
WO- 433309 -1
1400.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
66.65
STORAGE BOXES
154940
OE- 90459 -1
1400.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
44.85-
RETURN
00003097 154941
CP -WO 431999 -1
1400.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
432.06
OFFICE SUPPLIES
00003125 154942
WO- 438219 -1
1400.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
44.85
BULLETIN BOARD
154943
OE- 96809 -1
1400.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
63.20-
RETURN
00003097 154944
CP -WO- 431999 -1-
1400.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
2
CITY OF EDINA
2/14/2007 10:59:38
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 4
2/15/2007
2/15/2007
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Sub ledger Account Description
Business Unit
131.79
OFFICE SUPPLIES
00008081 155079
OE- 97153 -1
5510.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
ARENA ADMINISTRATION
36.07
BOXES
00005235 155080
WO- 438159 -1
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
7.80
OFFICE SUPPLIES
155081
OE- 96922 -1
1260.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ENGINEERING GENERAL
12.74
OFFICE SUPPLIES
155082
OE- 96922 -2
1260.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ENGINEERING GENERAL
1,022.60
294111
2/15/2007
119679 BIXBY PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE
80.65
RESTROOM RENTAL
00001855 155083
5325
1646.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
80.65
294112
2115/2007
119431 BLINK BONNIE
94.89
BOX LUNCHES
155084
442
1100.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
CITY COUNCIL
94.89
294113
2/15/2007
105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC
327.00
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
00003736 155085
50427933
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
163.20
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
00003736 155086
50428625
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
490.20
294114
2/1512007
120754 BOWER, LEAH
102.00
EMT BOOK
154985
020607
1470.6405
BOOKS & PAMPHLETS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
102.00
294115
2/15/2007
100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS
10.11
ARMS
00001938 154696
949849
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
17.88
DOOR KEYS
00005039 154697
950849
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
840.80
SPRING ASSEMBLY, BOLTS
00001983 154784
952734
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
160.99
RESERVOIR
00001987 154785
954070
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1,029.78
294116
2/1512007
100664 BRAUN INTERTEC
1,280.00
PROJECT MGMT & TESTING
154986
274291
47041.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
COURTNEY CONCESSION BUILDING
1,280.00
294117
2115/2007
101366 BRENTS SIGNS
21.30
UPDATE PRICE SIGN
00006107 154987
06-01 -16- 434
5410.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
21.30
294118
2115/2007
103279 BRETSON, GREG
100.00
2007 UNIFORM PURCHASE
154786
020707
1553.6201
LAUNDRY
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
100.00
2/14. 10:59:38
Page - 5
Business Unit
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
YORK SELLING
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
465.00
155030
46738
5842.5513
CITY OF,
A
465.00
R55CKREG LOG20000
294125 2/15/2007
100681 CATCO
Council Check Register
184.38
CARTRIDGES
00001982 154699
3 -21239
1553.6530
2/15/2007 - 2/15/2007
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
294119
2115/2007
3 -21604
119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC.
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
131.15
PURGE VALVE KIT, CARTRIDGES
00001976 154791
3 -20853
166.85
EDINA LIQUORS NEWSLETTER
154787
9517
5822.6575
PRINTING
166.85
EDINA LIQUORS NEWSLETTER
154787
9517
5842.6575
PRINTING
166.85
EDINA LIQUORS NEWSLETTER
154787
9517
5862.6575
PRINTING
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
ENGINEERING GENERAL
500.55
COMPUTER MONITORS
00004388 154990
DFJ3569
1495.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
294120
2/15/2007
COMPUTER MONITORS
108688 CANTON COMMUNICATIONS INC.
DFJ3569
1554.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
628.90
COMPUTER MONITORS
1,856.00
TV ADS
154988
070205 -1
5210.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
CAMERA BATTERY
00004382 155151
1,856.00
1260.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
ENGINEERING GENERAL
270.93
DIGITAL CAMERA & ACCESSORIES 00004382 155152
294121
2/15/2007
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES
36.22
SOUND CARD
00004383 155153
CTR3180
1260.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
6,183.30
1,055.84
154855
102644
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
6,183.30
294122
2/15/2007
100677 CARGILL INC.
12,857.08
ICE CONTROL SALT 00005000 154788
1812034
1318.6525
SALT
12,857.08
294123
2/15/2007
105777 CARLBERG, KIMBERLY
300.00
TEAM REGISTRATION REFUND
154698
020607
4077.4390
REGISTRATION FEES
300.00
294124
2/15/2007
116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE
2/14. 10:59:38
Page - 5
Business Unit
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
YORK SELLING
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
465.00
155030
46738
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
465.00
294125 2/15/2007
100681 CATCO
184.38
CARTRIDGES
00001982 154699
3 -21239
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
245.39
FITTINGS, HEATER ASSY KITS
00005045 154789
3 -21438
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
239.56
FLASHING LEDS
00001949 154790
3 -21604
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
131.15
PURGE VALVE KIT, CARTRIDGES
00001976 154791
3 -20853
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
800.48
294126 2/15/2007
102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC.
31.15
CAMERA ACCESSORIES
00004382 154989
DFX1144
1260.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
ENGINEERING GENERAL
209.64
COMPUTER MONITORS
00004388 154990
DFJ3569
1495.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
INSPECTIONS
419.26
COMPUTER MONITORS
00004388 154990
DFJ3569
1554.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
628.90
COMPUTER MONITORS
00004388 154990
DFJ3569
1553.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
13.27
CAMERA BATTERY
00004382 155151
CSM3874
1260.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
ENGINEERING GENERAL
270.93
DIGITAL CAMERA & ACCESSORIES 00004382 155152
CRV3037
1260.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
ENGINEERING GENERAL
36.22
SOUND CARD
00004383 155153
CTR3180
1260.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
ENGINEERING GENERAL
1,055.84
DRUM KITS, TONER
00004383 155153
CTR3180
1554.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
2/15/2007 - 2/15/2007
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
2,665.21
294127 2/15/2007 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO
194.05 154856 330852 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
620 00 154857 331046 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
2/14/2007 10:59:38
Page - 6
Business Unit
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
150.00
814.05
294132 2/15/2007
120760 COMMERS CONDITIONED WATER
294128
2115/2007
WATER CONDITIONER 00005904 155132
100256 CINGULAR WIRELESS
05456.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
1,039.84
49.86
102757 COMPUTERIZED FLEET ANALYSIS
154991
870517029X02042
5420.6188
TELEPHONE
CLUB HOUSE
020807
1281.6104
CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS
675.00
007
294134 2/15/2007
101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
49.86
19.22
SAFETY GLASSES 00005135 154701
02985345
1553.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
294129
211512007
02985345
114639 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
129.93
SAFETY GLASSES 00005135 154701
02985345
5910.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES'
35.75
41,877.00
BORDER ROADWAY RESURFACING
155181
2005 -1000
1500.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CONTINGENCIES
1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
41,877.00
BROOMS, SQUEEGEES 00005162 154794
02987750
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
19.61
SAFETY GLASSES, SIGNS 00005155 154945
294130
2115/2007
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
103040 CITY PAGES
80.66
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING
154700
100187091
5822.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
50TH ST SELLING
80.66
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING
154700
100187091
5842.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
YORK SELLING
80.68
MAGAZINE ADVERTISING
154700
100187091
5862.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
VERNON SELLING
242.00
294131
2115/2007
120747 CMS
15000
DRUG TEST
154792
012007532294
1550.6121
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
150.00
294132 2/15/2007
120760 COMMERS CONDITIONED WATER
1,039.84
WATER CONDITIONER 00005904 155132
286351
05456.1705.30
CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS
1,039.84
294133 211512007
102757 COMPUTERIZED FLEET ANALYSIS
675.00
MECH TOOLBOX TRAINING (5) 154992
020807
1281.6104
CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS
675.00
294134 2/15/2007
101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS
19.22
SAFETY GLASSES 00005135 154701
02985345
1553.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
41.17
SAFETY GLASSES 00005135 154701
02985345
1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
129.93
SAFETY GLASSES 00005135 154701
02985345
5910.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES'
35.75
SAFETY GLASSES 00005135 154793
02986260
1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
62.78
SAFETY GLASSES 00005162 154794
02987750
1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
112.64
BROOMS, SQUEEGEES 00005162 154794
02987750
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
19.61
SAFETY GLASSES, SIGNS 00005155 154945
02987094
1553.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
WM-456 LAKE CORNELIA N/HOOD
TRAINING
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
GENERAL (BILLING)
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
EQUIPMENT OPER' GEN
R65CKREG LOG20000
CITY Ot
.A
294141 211512007
112663 DOLLARS & SENSE
Council Check Register
1,000.00
DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING
154702
2/15/2007
— 2/15/2007
ADVERTISING OTHER
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING
154702
62.41
SAFETY GLASSES, SIGNS 00005155 154945
02987094
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
76.61
SAFETY GLASSES, SIGNS 00005155 154945
02987094
1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
560.12
PARKING MGMT BOOK
154994
020707
1260.6406
294135
211512007
119839 CORNEJO CONSULTING
294143 211512007
100739 EAGLE WINE
2,400.00
COMP PLAN CONSULTING 154795
020107
1140.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2,400.00
294136
2/15/2007
101590 CORNERSTONE ADVOCACY SERVICE
15,100.00
JAN 2007 SERVICES 154796
2
1504.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
11,250.00
2006 ADVOCACY SERVICES 155154
1
1504.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
26,350.00
294137
2115/2007
100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER
20.29
WATER 155087
777033
7410.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
20.29
294138
211512007
111057 D.A.R.E. AMERICA MERCHANDISE
37.50
DARE ITEMS 00003124 154993
MN -63431
1425.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
37.50
294139
211512007
101581 DAKOTA COUNTY TECHNICAL COLLEG
2/1, 10:59:38
Page- 7
Business Unit
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
PLANNING
HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION
HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION
PSTF ADMINISTRATION
DARE
75.00 RECERTIFICATION - J. VOELKER 00005732 154797 00048594 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING
75.00
294140 2/1512007 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING
663.00 154858 397279 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE BOTH ST SELLING
1,602.17 154859 397419 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
2,265.17
294141 211512007
112663 DOLLARS & SENSE
1,000.00
DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING
154702
21971
5822.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
1,000.00
DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING
154702
21971
5842.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
1,000.00
DIRECT MAIL ADVERTISING
154702
21971
5862.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
3,000.00
294142 211512007
120660 DOWNTOWN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMEN
75.95
PARKING MGMT BOOK
154994
020707
1260.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
' 75.95
294143 211512007
100739 EAGLE WINE
50TH ST SELLING
YORK SELLING
VERNON SELLING
ENGINEERING GENERAL
233.60 • 154860 539138 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
CITY OF EDINA 2/14/2007 10:59:38
R55CKREG LOG20000
'I Ch k R aster Page - 8
Counci ec eg
2/15/2007 - 211512007
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
1,181.19
154861
543799
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
154862
543808
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,335.53
155031
543804
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
881,98
3,532.30
-
294144 2/15/2007
100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
90.00
SESSION PRIORITIES DINNER
154704
22215
1100.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
CITY COUNCIL
90.00
294145 211512007
101321 EDINA HARDWARE
58.17
PAINT & SUPPLIES 00009109
154995
61491
5111.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT
58.17
294146 2115/2007
101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
49.75
MAILING LABELS
154705
5810
1600.4390.06
SAFETY CAMP
PARK ADMIN. GENERAL
49.75
294147 2/1512007
103594 EDINALARM INC.
268.38
ALARM MONITORING
154703
42629
5821.6250
ALARM SERVICE
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
511.20
ALARM MONITORING
154703
42629
5861.6250
ALARM SERVICE
VERNON OCCUPANCY
536.76
ALARM MONITORING
154703
42629
5841.6250
ALARM SERVICE
YORK OCCUPANCY
1,316.34
294148 2115/2007
101407 EGAN, MATT
199.92
2007 UNIFORM PURCHASE
155133
021207
5910.6201
LAUNDRY
GENERAL (BILLING)
199.92
294149 211512007
120755 ELECTRICAL LICENSING & INSPECT
25.00
ELECTRICAL PERMITS
154996
020807
5923.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
25.00
ELECTRICAL PERMITS
154996
020807
5921.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
LIFT STATION MAINT
25.00
ELECTRICAL PERMITS
154996
020807
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
26.00
ELECTRICAL PERMITS
154996
020807
1551.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CITY HALL GENERAL
75.00
ELECTRICAL PERMITS
154996
020807
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
176.00
294150 2115/2007
104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS
INC
437.65
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003721
154946
INV909077
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
437.65
294151 211512007
116303 ETONIC WORLDWIDE LLC
860.43
MERCHANDISE
154997
74343
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
54.78
SHOES
154998
71800
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL'
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY OF -.4A
2/141-, 10:59:38
Council Check Register
Page - 9
2/15/2007
-- 2/15/2007
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
71.47
SHOES
154999
59071
5440.5511
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP
PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
986.68
294152
211512007
100018 EXPERT T BILLING
5,527.80
JAN TRANSPORTS
154798
020507
1470.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
5,527.80
294153
2115/2007
102497 EXPLORER POST 925
1,620.00
2007 CONFERENCE
155134
021207
1419.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
RESERVE PROGRAM
1,620.00
294154
211512007
100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY
53.52
ROTOR
00001939 154706
6- 899092
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
53.52
ROTOR
00001939 154799
6- 899142
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
107.03
ROTORS
00001939 154800
6- 899141
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
214.07
294155
2/15/2007
120758 FARM TO MARKET CREATIONS
420.00
ICE SLEDS
155088
020707
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
420.00
294156
2/1512007
101432 FERRELLGAS
12.78
LP FUEL
00008088 154947
RNT1237695
5521.6581
GASOLINE
ARENA ICE MAINT
12.78
294157
2/1512007
120746 FERRIS, JESSICA
50.00
GOLF REGISTRATION REFUND
154801
020507
1629.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ADAPTIVE RECREATION
50.00
294158
211512007
104474 FILTERFRESH
290.90
COFFEE
00005190 154802
115177
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
290.90
294159
2115/2007
119211 FIRSTLAB
117.00
DRUG SCREENING
155155
188849
1550.6121
ADVERTISING PERSONNEL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
117.00
294160
2115/2007
101603 FLAHERTY'S HAPPY TYME CO.
470.40
154863
011107
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
470.40
294161
2/15/2007
102727 FORCE AMERICA
CITY OF EDINA
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
2/15/2007 - 2/15/2007
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
476 10 BOLTS 00005050 154803 01271808 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS
POSTAGE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
REPAIR PARTS
WEB DEVELOPMENT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CLASS REGISTRATION
GENERAL SUPPLIES
REPAIR PARTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
2/14/2007 10:59:38
Page - 10
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
ED ADMINISTRATION
EDINBOROUGH PARK
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
COMMUNICATIONS
INCLUSION PROGRAM
ART CENTER REVENUES
BUILDINGS
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER .
COS7 OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
476.10
294162
2/15/2007
104071 FREUND, JEFF
84.99
PETTY CASH
155089
020907
5610.6235
238.66
PETTY CASH
155089
020907
5620.6406
323.65
294163
211512007
102456 GALLS INC.
116.22
BINOCULARS
154948
5871363000018
1400.6610
116.22
294164
2115/2007
101662 GCSAA
150.00
DUES -JEFFREY LUGER
154707
#99807852
5410.6105
150.00
294165
2/1512007
100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY - MINNEA
295.81
AUTO PARTS
155090
013107
1553.6530
295.81
294166
2/1512007
119936 GLOBALOAK
4,669.00
WEBSITE MAINTENANCE
154708
405
2210.6124
4,669.00
294167
211512007
103316 GOETSCH, SAM L
689.43
SL INTERPRETER
155091
020807
4078.6103
689.43
294168
2/15/2007
120753 GOLZ, JUDY
.
177.00
CLASS REFUND
155000
020107
5101.4607
177.00
294169
2115/2007
101103 GRAINGER
47.12
VENTILATION CONTROL
00005132 154709
9285411139
5912.6406
159.84
EXIT LIGHT FIXTURE
00006065 154710
9281021254
5210.6530
287.36
SAFETY SUPPLIES
00006066 154711
9281251620
5422.6406
593.79
CABLE REEL
00005177 154804
9289277221
1552.6406
110.14
WIRE
00005149 154805
9287759089
5911.6406
1,198.25
294170
2/1512007
102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC
407.50
155032
88605
5842.5513
POSTAGE
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
REPAIR PARTS
WEB DEVELOPMENT
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CLASS REGISTRATION
GENERAL SUPPLIES
REPAIR PARTS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
2/14/2007 10:59:38
Page - 10
Business Unit
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
ED ADMINISTRATION
EDINBOROUGH PARK
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
COMMUNICATIONS
INCLUSION PROGRAM
ART CENTER REVENUES
BUILDINGS
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER .
COS7 OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date
Amount Supplier / Explanation
CITY OF ...A
Council Check Register
2/15/2007 - 2/15/2007
PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
TELEPHONE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
2/14- 10:59:38
Page - 11
Business Unit
YORK OCCUPANCY
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
407.50
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
294171 2115/2007
VERNON,SELLING
101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
56.95
CELL PHONE CHARGES
155092
020907
5841.6188
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
202.61
TONER FOR COPIER
155092
020907
5840.6513
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
259.56
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
294173 2115/2007
VERNON SELLING
100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO.
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
578.31
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
154864
542268
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
245.08
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
154865
538832
5862.5512
3,166.79
154866
540355
5862.5512
3,758.27
154867
543802
5862.5512
192.27
154868
539139
5862.5513
2,950.22
154669
543800
5862.5513
1,524.50
154870
543685
5862.5513
321.80
154871
541303
5862.5513
8,300.75
154872
543810
5842.5512
125.75-
154873
714307
5862.5513
253.80-
154874
714305
5862.5513
41.15-
154875
714306
5862.5513
261.52-
154876
714304
5862.5512
178.46-
154877
714429
5862.5512
23.26-
154878
713892
5862.5512
113.32-
154879
714083
5862.5512
3,294.43
155033
543809
5842.5513
942.15
155034
543806
5822.5512
519.02
155035
543805
5822.5513
80.90-
155036
714367
5822.5513
165.97-
155037
714350
5842.5512
169.20-
155038
714346
5842.5513
32.55-
155039
714366
5842.5513
24,347.71
294174 2/1512007
106431 HALL, MARY
150.00
PERFORMANCE 2/20/07
155124
020107
5610.6136
150.00
294175 2/15/2007
100791 HALLMAN OIL COMPANY
112.55
WINDOW WASH FLUID 00001301
154806
190012
1553.6584
2,052.38
BULK OIL 00001301
154807
189982
1553.6584
853.07
BULK OIL 00001301
154808
189983
1553.6584
3,018.00
TELEPHONE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
2/14- 10:59:38
Page - 11
Business Unit
YORK OCCUPANCY
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON,SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION
LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
2/14/2007 10:59:38
CITY OF EDINA
R55CKREG LOG20000
Page - 12
Council Check Register
2/15/2007
- 2/15/2007
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
294176
211512007
102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS
198.92
REGISTER PAPER 00007516 154949
251868
5862.6512
PAPER SUPPLIES
VERNON SELLING
198.92
294177
2/1512007
102618 HARDWOOD CREEK LUMBER INC
939.33
LATH, STAKES 00001901 154809
7150
1318.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SNOW & ICE REMOVAL
939.33
294178
2115/2007
102301 HARTLAND FUEL PRODUCTS LLC
14,596.08
GAS 00005896 154950
785953
1553.6581
GASOLINE
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
14,596.08
294179
211512007.
106659 HASTERT, JESSICA
8.00
PARKING PERMIT REFUND 155001
020707
4090.4751
PARKING PERMITS
STREET REVOLVING
8.00
294180
2/1512007
101215 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFF/
825.00
BOOKING FEES JAN 2007 155002
1409
1195.6170
COURT CHARGES
LEGAL SERVICES
825.00
294181
2/1512007
103838 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE
95.00
RECERTIFICATION -G. BRETSON 00005731 154810
00125361
1281.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
TRAINING
95.00
294182
2115/2007
103838 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE
95.00
RECERTIFICATION -T. HALSTEAD 00005731 154811
00125361/2
1281.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
TRAINING
95.00
294183
2115/2007
103838 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE
95.00
RECERTIFICATION -TONY LEONE 00005731 154812
0012536113
1281.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
TRAINING
95.00
294184
2/1512007
116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY
377.81
COMPUTER PCS AND PDAS 00004387 155093
41700455
1120.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
ADMINISTRATION
379.14
COMPUTER PCS AND PDAS 00004387 155093
41700455
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
1,699.74
COMPUTER PCS AND PDAS 00004387 155093
41700455
1553.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
53.19
COMPUTER PCS AND PDAS 00004385 155094
41587965
1120.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
ADMINISTRATION
474.99
COMPUTER PCS AND PDAS 00004385 155094
41587965
1260.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT.
ENGINEERING GENERAL
566.58
COMPUTER PCS AND PDAS 00004385 155094
41587965
1495.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
INSPECTIONS
3,551.45
CITY OF A
2/141. 0:59:38
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 13
2/15/2007
- 2/1512007
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
294185
211512007
100805 HIRSHFIELD'S
202.32
PAINT
154712
020434615
7412.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
PSTF RANGE
199.17
PAINT, PRIMER
00005025 154813
032208308
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
401.49
294186
2/15/2007
104375 HOHENSTEINS INC.
603.85
154880
410327
5822.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
50TH ST SELLING
603.85
294187
2/15/2007
100267 HOPKINS WESTWIND BAND
100.00
PERFORMANCE 2/18/07
155123
020107
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
100.00
294188
211512007
102588 IAFC
190.00
DUES RENEWAL
155095
020907
1470.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
190.00
294189
2/1512007
100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP.
70.27
HANGERS, BUSHINGS
00005122 154713
466812
05467.1705.31
MATERIALS /SUPPLIES
WM467 WELL #10, TRTMT PLNT #3
53.25
PLASTIC SHEET
00005051 154951
467555
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
123.52
294190
2/1512007
120759 INGLES, CLIFF
100.00
GIFT CERT REFUND
155096
020907
5201.4543
GOLF DOME RECEIPTS
GOLF DOME REVENUES
100.00
294191
2/15/2007
100818 INTERSTATE POWER SYSTEMS INC
1,840.65
GENERATOR REPAIR
00005048 154952
R001003558:01
5915.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
WATER TREATMENT
1,840.65
294192
2/15/2007
120712 IRON AGE CORPORATION
150.00
SAFETY BOOTS
00005194 154814
1070425
5910.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL (BILLING)
100.00
SAFETY BOOTS
00005194 154815
1067577
1646.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
82.99
SAFETY BOOTS
00005194 154816
1067586
5910.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL (BILLING)
332.99
294193
2/1512007
101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY
57.56
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
00005140 154714
4084909 -01
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
57.56
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
00005140 154714
4084909 -01
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
57.57
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
00005140 154714
4084909 -01
5912.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
BUILDINGS
247.07
LAMP FIXTURE
00005151 154817
4085199 -01
1552.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
63.97
CONNECTORS, NIPPLES
00005157 154818
4085260 -01
1551.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CITY HALL GENERAL
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
2115/2007 - 2/15/2007
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
5421.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
483.73
MEETING EXPENSE
4205.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
294194
211512007
1513.6218
100828 JERRY'S FOODS
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
1490.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
8,81
GENERAL SUPPLIES
155097
013107
5511.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17,11
GENERAL SUPPLIES
155097
013107
1551.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17,52
GENERAL SUPPLIES
155097
013107
1322.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
63.55
GENERAL SUPPLIES
155097
013107
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
90.24
GENERAL SUPPLIES
155097
013107
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
176.96
GENERAL SUPPLIES
155097
013107
374.19
294195
2115/2007
100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE
2,29
154819
013107
16.57
154819
013107
25.70
154819
013107
30.64
154819
013107
32.23
154819
013107
39.38
154819
013107
40.00
154819
013107
44.02
154819
013107
48.51
154819
013107
51.20
154819
013107
56.19
154819
013107
128.49
154819
013107
133.33
154819
013107
195.02
154819
013107
204.21
154819
013107
215.32
154819
013107
392.61
154819
013107
521.30
154819
013107
2,177.01
294196
211512007
102136 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION
SERVICE
29.96
LENSES
00001979 154715
0008494
29.96
294197
2/1512007
102146 JESSEN PRESS
5421.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1470.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
4205.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1628.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1513.6218
EDUCATION PROGRAMS
5421.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
1490.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5840.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1495.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5511.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5210.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1400.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1551.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5860.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1322.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5420.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1325.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1470.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
1553.6180
207.97 CITY COUNCIL LETTERHEAD 154716 631817011 1100.6406
207.97
294198 211512007 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN
3,378.31 155040 1056425 5842.5514
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
2/14/2007 10:59:38
Page - 14
Business Unit
GRILL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
PANDEMIC FLU GRANT
SENIOR CITIZENS
EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS
GRILL
PUBLIC HEALTH
LIQUOR YORK GENERAL
INSPECTIONS
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
GOLF DOME PROGRAM
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
CITY HALL GENERAL
VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL
EDINBOROUGH PARK
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
CLUB HOUSE
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
STREET NAME SIGNS
DISTRIBUTION
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
CITY COUNCIL
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING
CITY O�
.A
2/1, 10:59:38
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 15
2/15/2007
-- 2/15/2007
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier/ Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
3,378.31
294199 211512007
100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO.
116.42
CREDIT TAKEN TWICE
154881
BAL DUE
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
208.13
154882
1207027
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
215.75
154883
1203298
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
13.10-
154884
334101
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
7.83-
154885
334462
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
7.33-
154886
334097
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
2,577.25
155041
1209666
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
5,200.09
155042
1209668
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
1.08
155043
1209663
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
4,801.53
155044
1209669
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
3,076.57
155045
1209665
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
2,917.50
155046
1209670
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
292.12
155047
1209667
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
19,378.18
294200 2115/2007
106243 K9 STORM INCORPORATED
78.67
DOG LEAD
155003
1 /24STMT
4607.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION
78.67
294201 2/1512007
106186 KAEDING & ASSOCIATES INC.
1,190.00
ENGINEERING SERVICES
154717
060296C
05467.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
WM-467 WELL #10, TRTMT PLNT #3
1,190.00
294202 2115/2007
101995 KUDOS INC.
493.06
TROPHIES
154953
10294
4077.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
493.06
294203 2/15/2007
103257 LAND CARE EQUIPMENT CO.
141.37
FUEL PUMP, FILTER 00005055
154820
28314
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
141.37
294204 2/15/2007
117185 LANNERS, JENNIE
400.00
INSTRUCTOR AC
155004
020607
5110.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
400.00
294205 2/15/2007
100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC.
329.48
SCREWDRIVER SET, AIR HOSE 00005126
154821
5268015
1325.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET NAME SIGNS
294.12
NUTS, BOLTS, WASHERS 00005127
154822
5268014
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
623.60
2/1412007 10:59:38
Page- 16
Business Unit
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
2,077.41
WORKERS COMP
155158
CITY OF EDINA
1470.6045
R55CKREG LOG20000
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
7,640.95
WORKERS COMP
155158
122906
1400.6045
WORKERS COMPENSATION
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
Council Check Register
9,718.36
2/15/2007
2/1512007
294212
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
294206
2/1512007
38,594.00
101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
155159
10064
1550.6200
INSURANCE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
.100,491.25
PREMIUM
155070
9989
1550.6200
INSURANCE
100,491.25
2/1512007
112619 LES JONES ROOFING INC.
294207
2115/2007
101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
2,495.00
CONTRACT WORK 00005237 154823
515243
1551.6530
REPAIR PARTS
2,225.17
DEDUCTIBLE
155074
0200104705
1550.6200
INSURANCE
2,225.17
294214
211512007
105726 LINDMAN, DAVID
294208
211512007
101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
19.19
UNIFORM PURCHASE
155005
1,949.66
DEDUCTIBLE
155075
0200104704
1550.6200
INSURANCE
19.19
1,949.66
294215
294209
211512007
112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP
101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
1,379.08
DEDUCTIBLE
155156
123006
1550.6200
INSURANCE
50TH ST SELLING
1,379.08
461.71
294210
2115/2007
101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
721.71
DEDUCTIBLE
155157
12/30/2006
1550.6200
INSURANCE
721.71
294211
2/1512007
101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
2/1412007 10:59:38
Page- 16
Business Unit
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
2,077.41
WORKERS COMP
155158
122906
1470.6045
WORKERS COMPENSATION
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
7,640.95
WORKERS COMP
155158
122906
1400.6045
WORKERS COMPENSATION
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
9,718.36
294212
211512007
101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES
38,594.00
FINAL AUDIT
155159
10064
1550.6200
INSURANCE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
38,594.00
294213
2/1512007
112619 LES JONES ROOFING INC.
2,495.00
CONTRACT WORK 00005237 154823
515243
1551.6530
REPAIR PARTS
CITY HALL GENERAL
2,495.00
294214
211512007
105726 LINDMAN, DAVID
19.19
UNIFORM PURCHASE
155005
020507
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
19.19
294215
2/15/2007
112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP
461.71
154887
7103
5822.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
50TH ST SELLING
461.71
CITY O,
NA
2/', 10:59:38
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 17
2/15/2007
- 2/15/2007
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
294216
2/15/2007
105680 MAAS, STACY
26.45
PETTY CASH
155098
020807
5630.5510
COST OF GOODS SOLD
CENTENNIAL LAKES
49.77
PETTY CASH
155098
020807
5610.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ED ADMINISTRATION
54.82
PETTY CASH
155098
020807
5630.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENTENNIAL LAKES
131.04
294217
2/1512007
100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC.
2,069.47
CONVEYOR BELTS, BROOMS
00005025 154824
2071262
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
2,069.47
294218
2/15/2007
100865 MAGNUSON SOD
285.94
TROWELS, CHISELS
00001815 154825
307374
1301.6556
TOOLS
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
285.94
294219
2/15/2007
120502 MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SOLUTIO
8,133.13
DIGITAL SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM
00004171 155160
1561
5862.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
VERNON SELLING
8,133.13
294220
2115/2007
100868 MARK VII SALES
.03
154888
154555
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
1,995.00
154889
154819
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
3,852.57
154890
154556
5862.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
VERNON SELLING
68.95
154891
154557
5862.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
VERNON SELLING
2;218.05
154892
155335
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
99.75
154893
155296
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
58.20
154894
155336
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
1,839.30
155048
156844
5842.5514
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER
YORK SELLING
58.20
155049
156845
5842.5515
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
YORK SELLING
10,190.05
294221
2/15/2007
101030 MATHISON CO.
32.81
MEDIUMNARNISH GLOSS
00009062 155006.
657738-0
5110.6564
CRAFT SUPPLIES
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
32.81
294222
2/15/2007
119992 MCCARTHY WELL COMPANY
800.00
WELL MOTOR INSPECTION
154718
21250
5422.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
800.00
294223
2115/2007
103287 MCPA
40.00
MEMBERSHIP FEE
155007
020707
1400.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
40.00
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SEWER SERVICE METRO
REPAIR PARTS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
BROOMS
2/14/2007 10:59:38
Page- 18
Business Unit
RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE
CITY HALL GENERAL
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CITY HALL GENERAL
DISTRIBUTION
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
SEWER TREATMENT
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
STREET CLEANING
345.72
CITY OF EDINA
R55CKREG LOG20000
294225
2115/2007
102281 MENARDS
Council Check Register
78.23
LUMBER, PAILS, CEMENT 00005163 154954
137
1551.6406
2/15/2007 - 2115/2007
Check # Date Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No Account No
Subledger Account Description
294224 2/15/2007
101483 MENARDS
66.72
ANTIFREEZE, OIL
00006436 154719
2676 5431.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
36.72
OAK VENEER CORE
00005138 154826
2596 1551.6530
REPAIR PARTS
160.99
SHOP VAC, SUPPLIES
00008083 155099
3009 5511.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
65.82
HARDWARE
00001845 155100
2841 1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
15.47
HARDWARE
00001841 155101
2633 1646.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SEWER SERVICE METRO
REPAIR PARTS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
BROOMS
2/14/2007 10:59:38
Page- 18
Business Unit
RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE
CITY HALL GENERAL
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CITY HALL GENERAL
DISTRIBUTION
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
SEWER TREATMENT
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
STREET CLEANING
345.72
294225
2115/2007
102281 MENARDS
78.23
LUMBER, PAILS, CEMENT 00005163 154954
137
1551.6406
37.24
DRILL/DRIVER 00005171 154955
393
5913.6406
115.47
294226
2115/2007
100882 MERIT SUPPLY
318.70
PAINT 00005026 154720
71280
1552.6406
950.94
CLEANERS 00008082 154956
71267
5511.6511
1,269.64
294227
211512007
101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY
1,378.33
SOFTBALLS 154827
97079
4077.6406
1,378.33
294228
2/1512007
100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME
299,156.84
SEWER SERVICE 154957
0000841193
5922.6302
299,156.84
294229
2115/2007
102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAI
239.06
AUTO REPAIRS 00005057 154828
FOCS123762
1553.6530
239.06
294230
2/15/2007
104650 MICRO CENTER
74.54
REPLACEMENT HDD 00004386 155008
1313834
1646.6103
106.48
NETWORK SWITCHES 00004386 155008
1313834
1554.6406
181.02
294231
2/15/2007
100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA EAGAN
423.60
154895
0178067019
5862.5515
363.60
155050
0128077619
5842.5515
787.20
294232
2/15/2007
120742 MIKE MILLER TRUCKING
65.00
MOVE SCREENER TO ANOTHER SIIM001034 154721
417
1310.6523
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
SEWER SERVICE METRO
REPAIR PARTS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX
BROOMS
2/14/2007 10:59:38
Page- 18
Business Unit
RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE
CITY HALL GENERAL
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CITY HALL GENERAL
DISTRIBUTION
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
SEWER TREATMENT
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
VERNON SELLING
YORK SELLING
STREET CLEANING
I ' •I
2/1 10:59:38
Page - 19
Business Unit
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
GRILL
POOL ADMINISTRATION
ASSESSING
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
150.00
COURSE REGISTRATION 00001857 155106 021207 1644.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TREES & MAINTENANCE
150.00
CITY 01
—NA
680.00
R55CKREG LOG20000
680.00
294241 2115/2007
100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO.
254.24
STEEL FABRICATION 00005125 154831 0071087 -IN 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
Council Check Register
2/1512007
-- 2/15/2007
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
65.00
294233
2115/2007
100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER &
1,440.00
GATE VALVE REPAIR 00005202 154722
32941
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
1,260.00
GATE VALVE REPAIR 00005201 154723
32940
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
2,700.00
294234
2/15/2007
103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT
19,241.00
WATER PURCHASE 154958
020507
5913.6601
WATER PURCHASED
19,241.00
294235
2115/2007
102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY
17.86
CARBON DIOXIDE 155010
R101070138
5421.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
17.86
294236
211512007
101899 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
25.00
HAZARDOUS CHEMICAL FEE 154829
2706000072005M- 5310.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
1817
25.00
294237
2/15/2007
115975 MINNESOTA LEGAL REGISTER
80.00
2007 LEGAL REGISTER 154830
007130
1190.6105
DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
80.00
294238
2/1512007
101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT
1,055.38
REPAIR PARTS 00005204 155102
0202545
5923.6530
REPAIR PARTS
2,315.62
REPAIR PARTS 00005203 155103
0202546
5913.6530
REPAIR PARTS
3,371.00
155104
0202184
5913.6530
REPAIR PARTS
3,371.00-
155105
0202544
5913.6530
REPAIR PARTS
2,453.34
CORPS & NUTS 00005207 155135
0201647
5913.6530
REPAIR PARTS
5,824.34
294239
211512007
104147 MINNESOTA SOCIETY OF ARBORICUL
2/1 10:59:38
Page - 19
Business Unit
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
GRILL
POOL ADMINISTRATION
ASSESSING
COLLECTION SYSTEMS
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
DISTRIBUTION
150.00
COURSE REGISTRATION 00001857 155106 021207 1644.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TREES & MAINTENANCE
150.00
294240 2115/2007
102552 MINNESOTA TRANSPORTATION ALLIA
680.00
MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 155136 5522 1260.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ENGINEERING GENERAL
680.00
294241 2115/2007
100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO.
254.24
STEEL FABRICATION 00005125 154831 0071087 -IN 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
CITY OF EDINA 2/14/2007 10:59:38
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register Page - 20
2/15/2007 — 2115/2007
I d A t D ri tion Business Unit
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Sub a ger ccoun esc p
254.24
294242
2115/2007
103413 MORI STUDIO INC.
75.00
ABOUT TOWN IMAGES
154724
263
2210.6123
MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE
COMMUNICATIONS
75.00
294243
211512007
108668 MORRIS, GRAYLYN
150.00
PERFORMANCE 2/22/07
155125
020107
5610.6136
PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER
ED ADMINISTRATION
150.00
294244
2/1512007
100912 MOTOROLA INC.
2,066.79
REPAIR SERVICE AGREEMENT
155011
78048273
1400.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
2,066.79
294245
2/15/2007
102112 MPLS DEPT OF HEALTH & FAMILY S
55.00
LABORATORY ANALYSIS
155009
2007116
1400.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
55.00
294246
2115/2007
101696 MSP COMMUNICATIONS
449.00
GOLF AD
155161
G219386
5410.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
449.00
294247
211512007
100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC.
305.58
FAIRWAY REEL STOCK
00006435 154725
557625-00
5422.6530
REPAIR PARTS
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
418.63
PICKER TIRES
00006068 154726
557491 -00
5424.6530
REPAIR PARTS
RANGE
724.21
294248
211512007
120024 MULCAHY COMPANY INC.
307.79
SHAFT GROUNDING KITS
00005003 154727
126086
1551.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CITY HALL GENERAL
307.79
294249
2/1512007
120756 NATL LEAGUE OF JR COTILLION
100.00
DEPOSIT REFUND
155012
020807
5401.4553
CLUBHOUSE
GOLF REVENUES
100.00
294250
2/1512007
100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO.
623.00
154896
41999
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,132.00
154897
41998
5662.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
372.00
155051
42000
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
294251 2115Y 101359 NIBBE, MICHAEL
',
C
CITY OF
A
2/14. 10:59:38
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
Page - 21
2/15/2007
- 2/15/2007
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
59.99
UNIFORM, PURCHASE
155137
021207
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
59.99
294252
2115/2007
120752 NOODLES 8: CO.
200.00
OVERPAYMENT REFUND
155013
020807
1120.4314
INVESTIGATION FEE
ADMINISTRATION
200.00
294253
211512007
115616 NORTH IMAGE APPAREL INC.
20.00
2007 UNIFORM PURCHASES 00005181
154728
NIA2359C
1553.6201
LAUNDRY
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
368.88
FLOOR MATS 00005027
154832
NIA2359D
1552.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
388.88
294254
2/1512007
104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY
234.54
LIGHTS, MOUNT KITS 00001981
154729
12583
5910.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL (BILLING)
661.54
FLASHING LIGHT BAR 00001731
154833
12606
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
896.08
294255
2/15/2007
117830 NORTHLAND BUSINESS SYSTEMS
120.00
DIGITAL RECORDER REPAIR
154959
72299
1400.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
120.00
294256
2115/2007
103578 OFFICE DEPOT
19.18
CALENDAR REFILLS 00006104
155014
373076609001
5410.6513
OFFICE SUPPLIES
GOLF ADMINISTRATION
19.18
294257
211512007
101104 OLSEN FIRE PROTECTION INC.
1,105.00
FIRE SPRINKLER REPAIRS 00001854
155107
45210
1646.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
1,105.00
294258
2/1512007
101484 OSWALD HOSE & ADAPTERS
62.73
RINK HOSE REPAIRS 00005078
155108
103704
1648.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE'
62.73
294259
2115/2007
101718 PARTS PLUS
2,446.76
AUTO PARTS
154834
020107
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
2,446.76
294260
2/15/2007
100347 PAUSTIS 8 SONS
1,253.00
154898
81357964N.
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,330.25
154899
8135794 -IN
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
863.98
154900
8135795 -IN
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
3,447.23
CITY OF EDINA
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
2115/2007 - 2/15/2007
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
294261 211512007 110832 PC2 SOLUTIONS INC.
50748 TECHNICAL CONSULTING 155162 123006007 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
5822.5513
5822.5513
5862.5513
5822.5513
5842.5512
5842.5513
5842.5513
5842.5513
5842.5513
5842.5513
5862.5513
5842.5513
5842.5513
2210.6123
2210.6123
1628.6235
5110.6235
7413.6545
5521.6215
2/14/2007 10:59:38
Page - 22
Business Unit
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
507.48
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
294262
2115/2007
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,134.68
YORK SELLING
154901
. 2426237
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
810.80
VERNON SELLING
154902
2426777
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
972.54
154903
2426239
15.00-
154904
3354589
936.33
155052
2428165
164,32
155053
2428160
1,156.84
155054
2428164
3,537.29
155055
2428163
1,860.52
155056
•2428161
810.48
155057
2426238
4,770.77
155058
2428162
12.00-
155059
3355047
6.67-
155060
3355048
16,120.90
294263
2115/2007
101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY
200.00
ABOUT TOWN PHOTOS
154835
020507
100.00
ABOUT TOWN PHOTOS
154836
FEB52007
300.00
294264
211512007
100961 POSTMASTER - USPS
375.00
NEWSLETTER POSTAGE
154837
020607
375.00
294265
2115/2007
100961 POSTMASTER - USPS
1,660.00
POSTAGE
155015
020707
1,660.00
294266
2/15/2007
116396 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC
16.63
TANK RENTAL
154730
25210524
16.63
294267
2/1512007
100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC
270.00
BLADE SHARPENING 00008087
154960
225155
270.00
L
5822.5513
5822.5513
5862.5513
5822.5513
5842.5512
5842.5513
5842.5513
5842.5513
5842.5513
5842.5513
5862.5513
5842.5513
5842.5513
2210.6123
2210.6123
1628.6235
5110.6235
7413.6545
5521.6215
2/14/2007 10:59:38
Page - 22
Business Unit
CENT SERV GEN - MIS
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS
MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS
POSTAGE SENIOR CITIZENS
POSTAGE
ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
CHEMICALS PSTF FIRE TOWER
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT
CITY OF
2114. 10:59:38
R55CKREG LOG20000
_
..4A
Council Check Register
Page - 23
2115/2007 - 2/15/2007
Check # Date
Amount
Supplier I Explanation PO #
Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
294268 2/15/2007
100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY
364.90
154905
543807
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
780.42
154906
543798
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
294.44
154907
543803
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,439.76
294269 2/15/2007
105774 PRO QUALITY CARPET CARE
1,150.35
CARPET CLEANING 00006103 155016
19458
5420.6511
CLEANING SUPPLIES
CLUB HOUSE
1,150.35
294270 2/1512007
105690 PRO -TEC DESIGN INC.
240.00
ALARM MONITORING
154731
49525
7411.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PSTF OCCUPANCY
240.00
294271 2/1512007
100969 PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING ENGINEE
,
941.29
BACKWASH RECYCLE SYS
155163
03034.39
05427.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
PLANT #3 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST
1,000.00
BACKWASH RECYCLE SYS
165163
03034.39
05425.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
PLANT #2 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST
1,000.00
BACKWASH RECYCLE SYS
155163
03034.39
05426.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
PLANT #4 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST
2,941.29
294272 2115/2007
100970 QUALITY REFRIGERATION INC
159.50
COOLER REPAIRS
155138
36095
1400.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
159.50
294273 7/1512007.
100971 QUALITY WINE
2,356.29
154908
817797 -00
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
972.60
154909
817671 -00
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
73.85
154910
816078 -00
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
400.64
154911
820762 -00
5822.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
50TH ST SELLING
3,739.91
154912
820760 -00
5862.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
VERNON SELLING
1,477.56
154913
820677 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,421.72
154914
820529 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
306.30
154915
818619 -00
5862.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
1,741.90
164916
820759 -00
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
129.15
154917
820092 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,253.70
154918
820676 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,649.97
154919
820017 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
3,538.30
154920
820483 -00
5842.5512
COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR
YORK SELLING
1,078.96
154921
820528 -00
5842.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
1,043.00
155061
820045 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
1,372.10
155062
820551 -00
5822.5513
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
50TH ST SELLING
22,555.95
2/14/2007 10:59:38
CITY OF EDINA
R55CKREG LOG20000
Page- 24
Council Check Register
2115/2007
--2/1512007
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
Business Unit
Check # Date
294274 2115/2007
101965 QWEST
1400.6188
TELEPHONE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
17.71
651281-1355 8001311
155017
1355 -2/07
51.27
952 926 -0092
155018
0092 -2/07
5913.6188
TELEPHONE
DISTRIBUTION
85.89
952 926 -0419
155019
0419 -2/07
1646.6188
TELEPHONE
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
280.39
612 E24 -8661
155109
8661 -02107
5111.6188
TELEPHONE
ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
500.04
612 E24 -8657
155110
8657- 2/07
5420.6188
TELEPHONE
CLUB HOUSE
280.39
612 E24 -8656
155111
8656 -2/07
1628.6188
TELEPHONE
SENIOR CITIZENS
280.39
612 E24 -8659
155112
8659 -2/07
1470.6188
TELEPHONE
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
745.70
612 E01 -0426
155113
0426 -2107
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
500.04
612 E01-8391
155114
8391-2107'
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
500.04
612 E01 -8392
155115
8392 -2107
1550.6188
TELEPHONE
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
3,241.86
294275 2/15/2007
117692 R & B CLEANING INC.
447.30
FEB 2007 SERVICES
00005183 154732
1496
1375.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PARKING RAMP
447.30
294276 2/15/2007
112562 RADIO SHACK CORPORATION
53.31
PHONE
00006102 155020
249128
5421.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GRILL
53.31
294277 2/1512007
102327 RECREATION SPORTS OFFICIALS AS
1,620.00
OFFICIATING FEES
154961
020607
4077.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
1,620.00
-
294278 2/1512007
102986 RECYCOOL
137.50
ANTIFREEZE
00005046 154962
3701265
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
137.50
294279 2/15/2007
100975 RED WING SHOE STORE
99.95
SAFETY BOOTS
00005189 154838
72500000571
5910.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL (BILLING)
131.71
SAFETY BOOTS
00005189 154838
72500000571
5511.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
131.71
SAFETY BOOTS
00005189 154838
72500000571
5420.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
CLUB HOUSE
165.71
SAFETY BOOTS
00005189 154838
72500000571
5620.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EDINBOROUGH PARK
550.36
SAFETY BOOTS
00005189 154838
72500000571
1301.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
1,079.44
294280 211512007
118658 RIGHTWAY GLASS INC.
242.68
TINT WINDSHIELD
00001980 154839
42610
1553.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
242.68
154922 8367
294287 2/1512007
100305 SARA LEE COFFEE & TEA
TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR
5914.6103
752.50
COFFEE
155022
7614134
752.50
01338.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
BA -338 SOUTHDALE 1ST ADDITION
294288 211512007
CITY OF
BA -337 WOODHILL NEIGHBORHOOD
R55CKREG LOG20000
MAPLE BOARDS 00001912
154735
40428126
377.01
294289 2/15/2007
100995 SEH
Council Check Register
ANTENNA PROJECT
155168
0156489
1,398.25
ANTENNA PROJECT
155169
2/15/2007 - 2/15/2007
968.62
Check #
Date
Amount
Supplier / Explanation
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
Subledger Account Description
294281
2/1512007
0156534
117073 RINEHART, THOMAS
30.00
LICENSE RENEWAL
155021
020807
1281.6104
CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS
30.00
294282
2/15/2007
101902 RINK SYSTEMS INC
431.80
REPAIR RINK BOARDS
00008086 154963
9808407
5521.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
431.80
294283
2/1512007
118001 ROZEBOOM MILLER ARCHITECTS INC
40.58
ARCHITECT SERVICES
154733
21
4401.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
3,123.90
ARCHITECT/ENGINEERING
155164
17
4401.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
1,874.34
ARCHITECT /ENGINEERING
155165
18
4401.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
624.78
ARCHITECT/ENGINEERING
155166
19
4401.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
624.78
ARCHITECT/ENGINEERING
155167
20
4401.6710
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT
6,288.38
294284
2115/2007
100987 SA -AG INC
165.05
SAND
00005027 154734
52815
5913.6517
SAND GRAVEL & ROCK
165.05
294285
2/1512007
100988 SAFETY KLEEN
105.44
CHANGE OUT PARTS WASHER
00005245 154964
MB01919225
1553.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
105.44
294286
2/15/2007
101232 SALUD AMERICA
154922 8367
294287 2/1512007
100305 SARA LEE COFFEE & TEA
TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR
5914.6103
752.50
COFFEE
155022
7614134
752.50
01338.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
BA -338 SOUTHDALE 1ST ADDITION
294288 211512007
105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO.
BA -337 WOODHILL NEIGHBORHOOD
377.01
MAPLE BOARDS 00001912
154735
40428126
377.01
294289 2/15/2007
100995 SEH
1,277.35
ANTENNA PROJECT
155168
0156489
1,398.25
ANTENNA PROJECT
155169
0154842
968.62
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION
155170
0156531
17,052.30
BID DOCUMENT PREP
155171
0156535
17,110.87
BID DOCUMENT PREP
155172
0156534
2/14, .0:59:38
Page- 25
Business Unit
TRAINING
ARENA ICE MAINT
GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR
GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR
GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR
GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR
GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR
DISTRIBUTION
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL
1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL
5914.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR
5914.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR
05451.1705.21
CONSULTING INSPECTION
WM451 NINE MILE VILLAGE
01338.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
BA -338 SOUTHDALE 1ST ADDITION
01337.1705.20
CONSULTING DESIGN
BA -337 WOODHILL NEIGHBORHOOD
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
2/15/2007 — 2115/2007
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
1,195.90 FINAL DESIGN 155173 0156533 01338.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN
1 145 77 FINAL DESIGN 155174 0156532 01337.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN
.I
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
2114/2007 10:59:38
Page - 26
Business Unit
BA -338 SOUTHDALE 1ST ADDITION
BA -337 WOODHILL NEIGHBORHOOD
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
CONSULTING DESIGN BA -313 70TH & METRO
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES
REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
HOSPITALIZATION CITY HALL GENERAL
40,149.06
294290
2/1512007
118211 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO.
219.46
PAINT & SUPPLIES 00005123 154840
8149 -7
1552.6406
219.46
294291
2115/2007
120458 SIEMENS WATER TECHNOLOGIES COR
498.00
WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES 00008077 154965
2026201
5511.6406
498.00
294292
2/15/2007
103339 SMITHSHARPE FIRE BRICK SUPPLY
432.09
ADVANCER KILN SHELVES 00009099 155023
34802
5111.6710
432.09
294293
2115/2007
105099 SOUTHSIDE PRIDE
108.00
GOLF AD 155175
N19240
5210.6122
108.00
294294
211512007
116682 SPECIALTY WINES & BEVERAGES
192.00
155063
13751
5842.5513
192.00
294295
2/15/2007
101016 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC
5,687.12
PRE DESIGN 155176
5656 -7
01313.1705.20
1,264.77
70TH ST CORRIDOR STUDY 155177
5863 -4
1500.6103
6,951.89
294296
2/15/2007
103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC
74.06
FILTERS 00001985 154736
S153289
1553.6530
449.40
EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 00005058 154841
SF04394
1553.6530
523.46
294297
2/15/2007
100650 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC
81.87
PADLOCKS 00006061 154737
MN -432328
5422.6406
81.87
294298
2/15/2007
115620 STANTON GROUP
1,890.00
BOOKLETS, FORMS 155116
362142
1551.6040
1,890.00
.I
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
2114/2007 10:59:38
Page - 26
Business Unit
BA -338 SOUTHDALE 1ST ADDITION
BA -337 WOODHILL NEIGHBORHOOD
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT
ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
CONSULTING DESIGN BA -313 70TH & METRO
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES
REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
HOSPITALIZATION CITY HALL GENERAL
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY O, AA
Council Check Register
2/15/2007 - 2/15/2007
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No 'Account No Subledger Account Description
294299 2115/2007 120534 STANTON GROUP
109,294.00 PREMIUM 155071 80475 1550.6200 INSURANCE
109,294.00
294300 2/15/2007 101007 STAR TRIBUNE
211 10:59:38
Page- 27
Business Unit
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
3 379.88 WANT ADS 155117 013107 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
3,379.88
294301 211512007 119937 STEARNS COUNTY
300.00
OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT
155139
021207
1000.2055
DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS
GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET
300.00
294302
2/15/2007
101015 STREICHERS
175.37
SQUAD EQUIP INSTALL
154966
1411832
1400.6215
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
745.00
VEST
154967
1410936
1400.6203
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
920.37
294303
2115/2007
117992 STRINGER BUSINESS SYSTEMS
183.00
EQUIPMENT REPAIRS
154968
1217104
1400.6230
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
183.00
294304
2115/2007
101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET
39.47
WHEEL COVER
00001946 154738
475178CVW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
•
230.17
PAD KIT, ROTORS
00001946 154739
475458CVW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
411.89
VEHICLE REPAIRS
00005054 154842
CTCS515505
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
1,885.05
TRANSMISSION
00005052 154843
476107CVW
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
2,566.58
294305
2/1512007
105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC.
649.81
TIRES
00001615 154844
10064244
1553.6583
TIRES & TUBES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
649.81
294306
211512007
100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS
495.00
CLASS OF 2019 AD
00016102 154845
942667
2210.6122
ADVERTISING OTHER
COMMUNICATIONS
495.00
294307
2/15/2007
120595 T- MOBILE
51.59
SURVEYING PHONE
155118
012707
1260.6188
TELEPHONE
ENGINEERING GENERAL
51.59
294308
2/15/2007
117686 TECHNAGRAPHICS
141.11
DOG LICENSE APPLICATIONS
00003098 154969
2771011
1400.6575
PRINTING
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
CITY OF EDINA
R55CKREG LOG20000
Council Check Register
2/15/2007 — 2115/2007
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
2114/2007 10:59:38
Page - 28
Business Unit
DARE
SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL
CONSULTING DESIGN LS36 LIFT STATION #6
WELDING SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
INSURANCE
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
141.11
294309
2115/2007
112358 TEE'S PLUS
37.27
PLUSH LIONS, PENCILS, RULERS 00003123 155140
234102
1425.6406
37.27
294310
2/15/2007
101029 TESSMAN SEED CO.
210.87
RINK SHOVELS 00001842 155119
S076220 -IN
1648.6406
210.87
294311
2/15/2007
101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY
936.00
154923
436576
5862.5514
936.00
294312
211512007
102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLAN
1,806.80
BRIDGE INSPECTIONS 155178
000200700275
1260.6103
22,445.03
PLANS & SPECS 155179
000200700287
10036.1705.20
24,251.83
294313
2115/2007
101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY
54.04
CYLINDER/DEMURRAGE 00005200 154740
421729
5913.6580
29.63
WELDING GAS 00005193 154846
421727
1553.6406
83.67
294314
2/15/2007
118003 TOMMY BAHAMA
69.59
MERCHANDISE 00006404 155024
8825399
5440.5511
69.59
294315
2/15/2007
104064 TRANS UNION LLC
12.31
BACKGROUND CHECK 154970
01731409
1400.6103
12.31
294316
211512007
116535 TRAVELERS
10,000.00
DEDUCTIBLE 155180
000254015
1550.6200
10,000.00
294317
2115/2007
116302 TRI - ANIM HEALTH SERVICES INC
921.63
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003720 155026
MMH70031380
1470.6510
1,390.50
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003733 155027
MMH70203792
1470.6510
2,312.13
294318
21151'
101619 TRI - COUNTY LAW ENFORCEMENT ASS
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL SUPPLIES
2114/2007 10:59:38
Page - 28
Business Unit
DARE
SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE
COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL
CONSULTING DESIGN LS36 LIFT STATION #6
WELDING SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
INSURANCE
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
L .6
R55CKREG LOG20000
CITY G. ,,NA
Council Check Register
2/15/2007 - 2/15/2007
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
60.00 2007 MEMBERSHIP DUES 155025 020707 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS
2/', i 10:59:38
Page- 29
Business Unit
POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
60.00
294319
2/15/2007
102255 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO
43.91
OXYGEN
00003649 155120
844016
1470.6510
FIRST AID SUPPLIES
FIRE DEPT. GENERAL
43.91
294320
2/15/2007
102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO.
692.25
SEED MIXTURE
00006067 154741
16094
5422.6543
SOD & BLACK DIRT
MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS
692.25
294321
2/1512007
115379 U.S. BANK
31.16
MEETING EXPENSE
154971
050207
1120.6106
MEETING EXPENSE
ADMINISTRATION
14.95
NET ZERO
154972
FEB02
1500.6103
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CONTINGENCIES
127.97
TELEVISION
155141
FEB022007
5913.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
DISTRIBUTION
201.54
PARTS
155141
FEB022007
1553.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
467.56
FOOD, MATERIALS
155141
FEB022007
1301.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
GENERAL MAINTENANCE
843.18
294322
2/15/2007
101280 UAP DISTRIBUTION INC.
1,162.68
ICE MELT
00005239 154973
S006809016.001
4090.6406
GENERAL SUPPLIES
STREET REV_ OLVING
1,162.68
294323
2115/2007
101049 UHL COMPANY
149.00
QUARTERLY SERVICE CONTRACT 00005244 154974
25974
1553.6530
REPAIR PARTS
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
149.00
294324
2/15/2007
102104 UNDIS, PAT
101.58
ART WORK SOLD AT EAC
155028
020607
5101.4413
ART WORK SOLD
ART CENTER REVENUES
101.58
294325
2/15/2007
101053 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY
41.67
HEATER ELEMENT
00005005 154742
332575
5912.6530
REPAIR PARTS
BUILDINGS
166.85
BALLAST
00001044 154847.
332576
1322.6530
REPAIR PARTS
STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL
208.52
294326
2115/2007
103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC.
4,771.15
WATER MAIN REPAIR
00005197 154975
11744
5913.6180
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
DISTRIBUTION
4,771.15
294327
2/1512007
101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER
18.53
SAFETY GLASSES
00005139 154743
195849
5913.6610
SAFETY EQUIPMENT
DISTRIBUTION
R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA
Council Check Register
2/15/2007 —2/15/2007
Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description
c '6
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
2/14/2007 10:59:38
Page - 30
Business Unit
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
50TH STREET RUBBISH
50TH STREET RUBBISH
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
YORK OCCUPANCY
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
18.53
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
294328
2/1512007
101069 VOSS LIGHTING
530.74
BULBS 00005165
154848
15067011 -00
1552.6530
530.74
294329
2/15/2007
106699 WALSER CHRYSLER JEEP
1,378.46
VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005056 154849
CHCS239341
1553.6530
1,378.46
294330
2/1512007
103466 WASTE MANAGEMENT - SAVAGE
MN
3,040.53
REFUSE
154976
3887440
4095.6103
4,319.10
REFUSE
154977
3874880
4095.6103
7,359.63
294331
2115/2007
103196 WHEELER HARDWARE CO
447.93
REPAIR DOORS 00008090 154978
048552
5511.6180
1,465.50
DOCK DOOR REPAIRS
155121
048771
5841.6180
1,913.43
294332
2/15/2007
101033 WINE COMPANY,.THE
485.75
154924
159872 -00
5842.5513
702.35
155064
159873 -00
5822.5513
1,188.10
294333
2/15/2007
101312 WINE MERCHANTS
1,093.74
154925
181815
5862.5513
1,068.97
155065
182472
5842.5513
1,035.63
155066
182473
5862.5513
6.00-
155067
32253
5842.5513
3,192.34
294334
211512007
101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC
1,826.50
154926
190243
5862.5513
2,299.00
155068
190154
5842.5513
153.50
155069
190155
5842.5513
4,279.00
294335
2115/2007
120223 WORTHINGTON, HEATHER
-
329.99
ASSISTIVE HEARING DEVICE
155122
020907
1550.6710
329.99
c '6
REPAIR PARTS
REPAIR PARTS
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
CONTRACTED REPAIRS
2/14/2007 10:59:38
Page - 30
Business Unit
CENT SVC PW BUILDING
EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN
50TH STREET RUBBISH
50TH STREET RUBBISH
ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS
YORK OCCUPANCY
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE
YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
"0
R55CKREG LOG20000
Check # Date Amount
294336 2/15/2007
5,826.32
37.75
16.36
3,621.53
32.26
475.11
115.72
1,039.80
1,225.30
1,533.43
3,293.55
5,227.20
3,922.65
3,082.00
29,448.98
Supplier / Explanation
101726 XCEL ENERGY
514966303 -6
51- 7567037 -0
514151897-6
51- 6621207 -1
51- 5938955.6
51- 6137136 -8
51- 5634814 -2
51-6979948-4
51-69799484
51-69799484
51- 5605640 -1.
51- 6121102 -5
51- 6824328 -7
51- 5605640 -1
294337 211512007 100568 XEROX CORPORATION
410.61 TONER
351.43 JAN USAGE
101.19 JAN USAGE
863.23
1,158,994.68 Grand Total
154980 197908978 1550.6406
154981 022826587 1400.6230
155029 022826764 5110.6151
Subledger Account Description Business Unit
Payment Instrument Totals
Check Total 1,158,994.68
Total Payments 1,158,994.68
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
2/141.__. 10:59:38
Page - 31
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
DISTRIBUTION
AQUATIC WEEDS
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
PONDS & LAKES
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
VERNON OCCUPANCY
YORK OCCUPANCY
DISTRIBUTION
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CLUB HOUSE
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
CITY OF
L—NA
Council Check Register
2115/2007
--2/15/2007
PO # Doc No
Inv No
Account No
154744
98646393
1330.6185
154745
98856948
1321.6185
154746
98798502
1646.6185
154747
98835614
5913,6185
154748
98677143
4086.6185
154749
98667946
5430.6185
154750
98678033
5933.6185
154751
98699885
5821.6185
154751
98699885
5861.6185
154751
98699885
5841.6185
154752
98480142
5913.6185
154979
99142455
1646.6185
155142
99505165
5420.6185
155143
99039096
5913.6185
154980 197908978 1550.6406
154981 022826587 1400.6230
155029 022826764 5110.6151
Subledger Account Description Business Unit
Payment Instrument Totals
Check Total 1,158,994.68
Total Payments 1,158,994.68
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
LIGHT & POWER
2/141.__. 10:59:38
Page - 31
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
STREET LIGHTING REGULAR
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
DISTRIBUTION
AQUATIC WEEDS
RICHARDS GOLF COURSE
PONDS & LAKES
50TH ST OCCUPANCY
VERNON OCCUPANCY
YORK OCCUPANCY
DISTRIBUTION
BUILDING MAINTENANCE
CLUB HOUSE
DISTRIBUTION
GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL
SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL
EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION
e 'i
2/14/2007 11:01:31
Page- 1
CITY OF EDINA
R55CKSUM LOG20000
Council Check Summary
2/15/2007 - 2/15/2007
Company
Amount
01000. GENERAL FUND
474,565.68
02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND
5,539.00
04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND
58,742.80
04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND
5,687.12
05100 ART CENTER FUND
3,315.05
05200 GOLF DOME FUND
2,410.26
05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND
25.00
05400 GOLF COURSE FUND
12,596.56
05500 ICE ARENA FUND
3,403.09
05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND
1,942.04
05800 LIQUOR FUND
150,390.96
05900 UTILITY FUND
404,529.79
05930 STORM SEWER FUND
521.61
05950 RECYCLING FUND
33,958.00
07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND
1,367.72
Report Totals
1,158,994.68
We CW*M to the best of our knowledge
and belief, that these claim
corn* in dl nuterW nespecta
of the City
pnoosdrr�esde� 77 ' 1'a'�
e 'i
2/14/2007 11:01:31
Page- 1
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To: Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item # VIII.B
From: John Wallin
Consent ❑
Finance Director.
Information Only ❑
Date: February 20, 2007
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
®
To Council
Subject: Utility Fees — Commercial
Action ❑
Motion
and Industrial
❑
Resolution
®
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Approve second reading of Utility Fees Ordinance 2007 -2.
Info /Background:
Attached are the following schedules for Utility fees and charges proposed for 2007 for
commercial and industrial properties.
1) Ordinance No. 2007 -2 amending Code Section 185 Increasing Utility Fees.
2) Schedule of rate increase for Commercial and Industrial properties under three
scenarios.
Under the Ordinance approved January 16 for utility rate increases, the commercial and
industrial water rate was set at the same three tiered rate as residential. Due to the
volume some Commercial and Industrial property use, most water used by these
properties would be at the highest tier leaving very large percentage increases along
with the increase in storm water fees.
The Council had also previously discussed the commercial and Industrial lawn watering
at the two highest tiers. This is now reflected in the attached ordinance.
ORDINANCE N0.2007 -2
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS:
Section 1. The following described fees of Schedule A to Code Section 185 are amended to read
as follows:
SECTION
SUBSEC.
PURPOSE OF
FEEXHARGE
AMOUNT
1100
1100.03 Subd.2
Domestic accounts used by
commercial and industrial
$0.93 Up to 3500 cubic feet
buildings, including schools and
$1.23 Over 3500 cubic feet
churches
Lawn watering accounts used by
commercial and industrial
$1.23 Up to 3500 cubic feet
buildings, including schools and
$1.93 Over 3500 cubic feet
churches
Section 2. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be February 21, 2007.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Mayor
RATE INCREASE SCENARIOS COMMERCIAL & INDUSTRIAL
2006 AND THREE SCENARIOS FOR 2007
AVERAGE1 2006 QTRLY 2006 QTRI
USAGE I WATER SEWER
FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL
12,798
11,006.28
29,947.32
SOUTHDALE
5,402
4,645.72
12,640.68
CONAGRA FOODS
1,281
1,101.66
2,997.54
BYERLY FOODS
1,680
1,444.80
3,931.20
VALLEY VIEW SCHOOL
905
778.30
2,117.70
PENTAGON PARK OFFICE
815
700.90
1,907.10
ROMANO'S MACARONI GRILL
724
622.64
1,694.16
EDINA COMMUNITY CTR
507
436.02
1,186.38
CREEK VALLEY SCHOOL
262
225.32
613.08
HIGHLANDS SCHOOL
147
126.42
343.98
FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL
12,798
SOUTHDALE
5,402
CONAGRA FOODS
1,281
BYERLY FOODS
1,680
VALLEY VIEW SCHOOL
905
PENTAGON PARK OFFICE
815
ROMANO'S MACARONI GRILL
724
EDINA COMMUNITY CTR
507
r - - °K VALLEY SCHOOL
262
ANDS SCHOOL
147
FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL.
12,798
SOUTHDALE
5,402
CONAGRA FOODS
1,281
BYERLY FOODS
1,680
VALLEY VIEW SCHOOL
905
PENTAGON PARK OFFICE
815
ROMANO'S MACARONI GRILL
724
EDINA COMMUNITY CTR
507
CREEK VALLEY SCHOOL
262
HIGHLANDS SCHOOL
147
FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL
12,798
SOUTHDALE
5,402
CONAGRA FOODS
1,281
P" -QLY FOODS
1,680
Y VIEW SCHOOL
905
1GON PARK OFFICE
815
ROMANO'S MACARONI GRILL
724
EDINA COMMUNITY CTR
507
CREEK VALLEY SCHOOL
262
HIGHLANDS SCHOOL
147
CONSUMPTION
WATER RATE OF THREE TIERS - SAME AS RESIDENTIAL
METER
STORM
SALES
TOTAL AVG
CHARGE
WATER
TAX
QTRLY BILL
TOTAL
CHARGE
SEWER
2006 .
WATER
TAX
QTRLY BILL
%
144.23
1,910.39
0.00
43,008.22
144.23
9,280.87
301.97
27,013.47
144.23
1,046.75
71.61
5,361.79
29.84
1,04531
93.91
6,545.06
144.23
1,024.10
0.00
4,064.33
29.84
755.50
45.56
3,438.90
18.53
302.78
40.47
2,678.58
144.23.
1,155.65
0.00
2,922.28
144.23
741.24
0.00
1,723.87
144.23
392.60
0.00
1,00723
WATER RATE OF THREE TIERS - SAME AS RESIDENTIAL
2007 QTRLY
2007 QTRLY
2007 QTRLY
STORM
SALES
TOTAL AVG
WATER
TOTAL
WATER
SEWER
METER
WATER
TAX
QTRLY BILL
%
%
THREE TIER
%
CHARGE
CHARGE
CHARGE
2007
INCREASE
INCREASE
24,644.14
31,355.10
153.60
2,559.92
0.00.
58,712.76
123.91%
36.52%
10,369.86
13,234.90
153.60
12,436.37
674.04
36,868.77
123.21%
36.48%
2,416.33
.3,138.45
153.60
1,402.65
157.06
7,268.09
119.34%
35.550/6
3,186.40
4,116.00
31.78
1,400.72
207.12
8,942.01
120.54%
36.62%
1,690.65
2,217.25
153.60
1,372.29
0.00
5,433.79
117.22%
33.69%
1,516.95
1,996.75
31.78
1,012.37
98.60
4,656.45
116.43%
35.41%
1,341.32
1,773.80
19.47
405.73
87.19
3,627.50
115.42%
35.43%
922.51
1,242.15
153.60
1,548.57
0.00
3,866.83
111.58%
32.32%
449.66
641.90
153.60
993.26
0.00
2,238.42
99.57%
29.85%
227.71
360.15
153.60
526.08
0.00
1,267.54
80.12%
25.84%
FLAT WATER RATE OF LOWEST TIER
2007 QTRLY
2007 QTRLY
2007 QTRLY
STORM
SALES
TOTAL AVG
WATER
TOTAL
WATER
SEWER
METER
WATER
TAX
QTRLY BILL
%
%
AT $.93
CHARGE
CHARGE
2007
INCREASE
INCREASE
11,902.14
31,355.10
153.60
2,559.92.
0.00
45,970.76
8.14%
6.89%
5,023.86
13,234.90
153.60
12,436.37
326.55
31,175.28
8.14%
15.41%
1,191.33
3,138.45
153.60
1,402.65
77.44
5,963.46
8.14%
11.22%
1,562.40
4,116.00
31.78
1,400.72
101.56
7,212.45
8.14%
10.20%
841.65
2,217.25
153.60
1,372.29
0.00
4,584.79
8.14%
12.81%
757.95
1,996.75
31.78
1,012.37
49.27
3,848.12
8.14%
11.90%
673.32
1,773.80
19.47
405.73
43.77
2,916.08
8.14%
8.87%
471.51
1,242.15
153.60
1,548.57
0.00
3,415.83
8.14%
16.89%
243.66
641.90
153.60
993.26
0.00
2,032.42
8.14%
17.90%
136.71
360.15
153.60
526.08
0.00
1,176.54
8.14%
16.81%
WATER RATE OF LOWER TWO TIERS
2007 WATER
2007 QTRLY
2007 QTRLY
STORM
SALES
TOTAL AVG
WATER
TOTAL
$.93 AND $1.23
SEWER
METER
WATER
TAX
QTRLY BILL
%
%
.TIERS
CHARGE
CHARGE
2007
INCREASE
INCREASE
15,731.04
31,355.10
153.60
2,559.92
.0.00
49,799.66
42.93%
15.79%
6,633.96
13,234.90.
153.60
12,436.37
431.21
32,890.03
42.80%
21.75%
11565.13
3,138.45
153.60
1,402.65
101.73
6,361.56
42.07%
18.65%
2,055.90
4,116.00
31.78
1,400.72
133.63
7,738.03
42.30%
18.23%
1,102.65
2,217.25
153.60
1,372.29
0.00
4,845.79
41.67%
19.23%
991.95
1,996.75
31.78
1,012.37
64.48
4,097.33
41.53%
19.15%
880.02
1,773.80
19.47
405.73
57.20
3,136.22
41.34%
17.09%
613.11
1,242.15
153.60.
1,548.57
0.00
3,557.431
40.62%
21.73%
311.76
641.90
153.60
993.26
0.00
2,100.52
38.36%
21.85%
170.31
360.15
153.60
.526.08
0.00
1,210.14
34.72%
20.15%
REPORT /RECOMMENDATION
To:
Mayor & City Council
Agenda Item # VIII.0
From:
John Wallin
Consent ❑
Finance Director
Information Only ❑
Date:
February 20, 2007
Mgr. Recommends ❑
To HRA
®
To Council
Subject:
Financial Policies
Action ®
Motion
Program
❑
Resolution
❑
Ordinance
❑
Discussion
Recommendation:
Approve financial management policies and investment policies.
Info /Background:
Last year, Standard & Poor's (S & P) released their new Financial Management
Assessments Criteria. S & P will provide their traditional rating, along with an
assessment of financial management, rated strong, standard, or vulnerable. Today's
financial position provides a current picture, but management policies and practices
provide insight for the future. Since bonds are a long -term transaction,, gauging where
the issuer will be financially throughout the bond term is achieved by assessing financial
management. A government's ability to implement timely and sound financial and
operational decisions in response to economic and fiscal demands is an important
component of credit quality. S & P introduced the Financial Management Assessments
in order to make certain aspects of their analysis on management more transparent —
specifically those concerned with policies and practices that are considered most critical
to credit quality.
The Financial Management Assessments looks at seven areas most likely to affect
credit quality. All of these elements can impact a governments bottom line and, as a
result, its credit quality. The seven areas that S & P will assess cities on financial
management are:
• Revenue and. expenditure assumptions
• Budget amendments and updates
• Long term financial planning
• Long term capital planning
• Investment management policies
• Debt management policies
• Reserve and liquidity policies
The Financial Management Assessments is one component of an assigned rating. S &
P will continue to evaluate all of the other factors = economic, financial condition, debt,
and management.
These policies will be evaluated periodically to make sure they continue to reflect the
City's risk tolerance and that the policies reflect the overall plan for the bonds. Many
cities have incorporated the policies into the budget and Capital Improvement Program
process and annual approval.
The long term capital plan was adopted by the City Council at the January 16 Council
meeting. The long term financial planning will be addressed during the next budget
cycle. The remaining 5 policies are all addressed with this group of policies.
To perform its analysis of local government financial practices, Standard & Poor's will
rely on documentation provided by the city and discussions with the organization's
management. Relevant documents include audited financial statements and
accompanying notes, budget documents, financial plans, management policy
statements, procedure manuals, and periodic reports. Discussions provide an important
opportunity for management to elaborate on the factors listed above, as well as answer
questions, so as to enable S & P analysts to assess the factors as thoroughly as
possible.
The Investment Policy has various additions from the current policy. that reflect the
increased reporting requirements under Government Accounting Standards Board
(GASB) Statement 40 concerning the disclosure of various forms of investment risk.
The additions seek to limit the risk by excluding certain type of investments from the
portfolio.
The Proposed Financial Management Policies contain Operating Budget Policies,
Revenue Policies, Fund Balance Policies, Capital Outlay Policies, and Debt
Management Policies.
The Investment Policy and Financial Management Policies have not changed since
presented to the City Council at the February 6 Council workshop.
Public Finance Criteria: Financial
Management Assessment
Phmaiy&v&Ana
James Wiemken
Chicago
(Editor's note: The following replaces the criteria published in the 2005 Public Finance Criteria
(1) 312 - 233 -1005
Book)
james_wianken@
'itandardandpoors•com
The rigor of a government's financial management practices is an important factor in Standard
Sewndary[kieafnAnalyst:
Colleen Woodell '
& Poor's Ratings Services analysis of that government's creditworthiness. Managerial
New York
decisions, policies, and practices apply directly to the government's financial position and
(1) 212A38-2118
colleen_woodell@
operations, debt burden, and other key credit factors. A government's ability to implement
stardardandpoors.com
timely and sound financial and operational decisions in response to economic and fiscal
Ridiard J Marino
demands is a primary determinant of near-term changes in credit quality. Standard & Poor's
New York
(1) 212-438 -2058 p
will now offer a more transparent assessment of a government's financial practices as an
ricFmrd_marino@
integral part of our general obligation and appropriation credit rating process.
standardandpoors.com
Assessing Financial Practices
Major elements of governmental financial management include economic analysis, revenue
forecasting, risk management, accounting practices, financial strategies, cash and liquidity
administration, and debt management. All of these elements have an impact on a
government's bottom line, and, as a result, on its credit quality. If a government is unable or
unwilling to employ its authority in a timely manner to address events that impact its budget
and financial condition, its credit rating can be adversely affected.
Many finance directors and other local government officials take pride in the managerial
policies, practices, and structures they have established to ensure efficiency and quality of
service, and to promote innovation and security. While credit ratings incorporate financial
management as one of many factors, the impact of financial management on the rating may
PubHcaaonDate
not be readily apparent because other factors may counterbalance, or even outweigh it.
Jule 27, 2006
Examples of such factors include local economic conditions, debt levels, and statutory
t
r
Pubic Finance Criteria: Financial Management Assessment
limitations. By focusing special attention on the assessment of financial practices, Standard & Poor's
will more fully recognize governments' efforts in this important area. In fact, the vast majority of
downgrades in recent years can be attributed to financial practices, or lack thereof. (For further
information on this trend, see the report, "GO Credit Ratings Are At A Crossroad As Downgrades
Increase," RatingsDirect, June 12, 2006).
Analytical Framework.
Standard & Poor's has established an analytical methodology that evaluates established and ongoing
management practices and policies in the seven areas most likely to affect credit quality. These areas
are:
■ Revenue and expenditure assumptions
• Budget amendments and updates
• Long term financial planning
• Long term capital planning
• Investment management policies
• Debt management policies .
• Reserve and liquidity policies
The evaluation of each area focuses on best practices and policies that are credit - important in most
governments rather than policies that address issues that are fairly unusual or unique to the
government. The nature of the policies and practices considered are those that governments may use in
some manner regardless of the size or type of government. Issuers that rank well in the evaluation
should be those whose policies help reduce the likelihood of credit deterioration, or enable them to
benefit more from changing conditions, whether they are economic, budgetary, statutory, or personnel
related.
Users of the FMA, however, should also realize its limitations. By focusing on a government's
policies and practices, the FMA is not an evaluation of the competency or aptitude of individual
finance professionals; nor is it an evaluation of a finance department's ability to handle unique
challenges. Moreover, the nature of the entity's governing body, the effectiveness of its governance
practices, and issues of public policy pursued by the government are beyond the scope of this analysis.
Although Standard & Poor's considers in its analysis any material information that provides relevant
context or influences financial management, it is important to note that this assessment of financial
practices is based primarily on the existence and implementation of management practices, and not
necessarily the results achieved by such practices. Results —both positive and negative —are assumed to
manifest themselves in other visible ways. The purpose of the focus on policies and practices is to
evaluate the potential for credit quality to move away from those currently indicated by results.
The following tables detail each of the seven financial practice areas examined by Standard & Poor's.
Standard & Poor'F I COMMENTARY 2
Public Finance Criteria: Finanaai Management Assessment
Revenue And Expenditure Assumptions
Are the organization's finanaal assumptrans and pvojecom realistic and wellgrounded from both long -term and recent band
pux?
Strong formal historic Vend analysis is performed and updated annually for both revenue and spending; regular effort is made to
determine whether revenues or expenditures will deviate from their long -term vends over the next couple of years: evidence
of independent revenue forecasting exists(when possible).
Standard Optimistic assumptions exist that, while supportable, add risk; assumptions are based on recent performance, but little
evidence of questioning or validating assumptions exists.
Vulnerable Assumptions neglect likely shortfalls, expenditure pressures or other pending issues; assumptions exist which enjoy no
prudent validation.
Budget Amendments And Updates
Are dwe procedures for reviewing acrd amending the budget based on updated information and actual perfomram a to ensure fiscal targets
are met?
Strong . At least quarterly budget surveillance is maintained to identify problem areas and enable timely budget adjustments;
management exhibits ability and willingness to address necessary.intrA -year revenue and expenditure changes to meet fiscal
targets.
Standard Semiannual budget reviews exist: management identifies variances between budget and actual performance.
Vulnerable No formal process exists for regular review and timely updating of budget during the year.
Long -Term financial Planning -
Does management have a long -term fnandal plan that allows them to identify Adury revenues and e;rpendrdues as wegas address
upcoming issues that might affect these?
Strong A multi -year financial plan exists where future issues are identified and possible solutions are identified, if not implemented;
revenue and expenditure decisions are made primarily from a long -term perspective. Structural balance is a clear goal.
Standard Multi -year projections are done informally, multi -year projections are done, but without discussion of pending issues, so that
issues are not addressed; some one -shot actions exist, but the long -term consequences of these actions are acknowledged
and communicated.
Vulnerable No long -term financial planning exists; operational planning is done on a year -to -year (or budget -to- budget) basis; one -shot
budget fixes are used with little attention to long -term consequences.
Long -Term Capital Planning .
Has dw organization aeeted a lorry -term capital mVrovemem program?
Strong A five -year rolling CIP with funding identified for all years exists and is linked to the operating budget and long -term revenue
and financing strategies.
Standard A five -year CIP is done, but is generally limited to projects to be funded from the current budget plus a four -year wish list;
some funding for out -year projects is identified, but not all.
Vulnerable No five -year CIP exists; capital planning is done as needs arise.
www.standardandpoors.com 3
Public Finance Criteria: Financial Management Assessment
Table 5
Policies Investment Management
Has ft organuabon established polities pertaining to fnvesbaents such as the selection of financial imbtloons hxservices and
transactions risk assessment invesbnent objedivos• invesowntmatmities and w/ati Ivry; portfolio diverstrrcaw4 safekeeping and
custody, and investment perfmrnance repa►ft bendWmrft and disclosure?
Strong Investment policies exist and are well defined: strong reporting and monitoring mechanisms exist and are functioning.
Standard Informal or non - published policies exist: policies are widely communicated and followed.
Vulnerable Absence of informal or non - published policies
Table 6
Debt Management Policies
Has the aWnuaDon established polities pertaining to the asuance of debt such as projects that may mmaywt be funded with debt
(inckdmg eco mmic development projeebl matm lyand debt service O Me; use ofsea" and pledges aedit edwncement and
derivatives; and debt refunding guidelines?
Strong Debt policies exist and are well defined; strong reporting and monitoring mechanisms exist and 5re functioning. If swaps are
allowed, a formal swap management plan that follows S &P's guidelines (see the DDP) has been adopted.
Standard Basic policies exist: policies are widely communicated and follow_ ed. If swaps are allowed there is a swap management plan
in place, but it does not follow S &P's guidelines.
Vulnerable Absence of basic policies or clear evidence that basic policies are followed. Swaps are allowed but there is no swap
management plan in place, and /or there is no local (non -FA) knowledge about the swap.
Reserve And Liquidity Policies
Has fhe organzabon established a formalized operating reserve policy, which takes into account the govmnment's rash Now /operating
requirements and the historic volatility ofremures and eVeaftnes through economic cycles?
Strong A formal operating reserve policy is well defined. Reserve levels are clearly linked to the government's cash flow needs and
the historic volatility of revenues and expenditures throughout economic cycles. Management has historically adhered to it.
Standard A less defined policy exists, which has no actual basis but has been historically adhered to it.
Vulnerable Absence of basic policies or, if they exist, are not followed.
Assessment Methodology
Standard & Poor's evaluates and assigns each of the seven areas a qualitative ranking, based on the"
above framework. In determining the overall assessment, the revenue and expenditure assumptions,
budget amendments and updates are given a relatively higher importance; long -term financial planning
and liquidity policies are given an average importance; and capital planning, debt policies, and
investment policies receive relatively less weight. The difference in degrees of importance is limited,
however, so that each factor's contribution to the assessment is meaningful.
Overall assessments are communicated using the following terminology: The term "good ", in
addition to the terms "strong ", "standard ", and "vulnerable ", is used to further differentiate
governments with a mix of strong and standard practices.
Standard & Poor's I COMMENTARY
Public Finance Chteria: Finandal Management Assessment
Strong"
A Financial Management Assessment of 'strong' indicates that practices are strong, well embedded, and
likely sustainable. The government maintains most best practices deemed critical to supporting credit
quality and these are well embedded in the government's daily operations and practices. Formal
policies support many of these activities, adding to the likelihood that these practices will be continued
into the future and transcend changes in the operating environment or personnel.
"Good"
A Financial Management Assessment of 'good' indicates that practices are deemed currently good, but
not comprehensive. The government maintains many best practices deemed as critical to supporting
credit quality, particularly within the finance department. These practices, however, may not be
institutionalized or formalized in policy, may lack detail or long -term elements, or may have little
recognition by decision makers outside of the finance department.
Standard"
A Financial Management Assessment of 'standard' indicates that the finance department maintains
adequate policies in most, but not all key areas. These policies often lack formal detail and
institutionalization, and may not include best practices.
"Vulnerable"
A Financial Management Assessment of 'vulnerable' indicates that the government lacks policies in
many of the areas deemed most critical to supporting credit quality. The 'vulnerable' designation
suggests a high degree of uncertainty regarding a government's ability to effectively adapt to changing
conditions that could threaten its long -term financial position.
Analytical Process And Supporting Documentation
To perform its analysis of local government financial practices, Standard & Poor's will rely on
documentation provided by the government and discussions with the organization's management.
Relevant documents include, but are not limited to, audited financial statements and accompanying
notes, budget documents, financial plans, management policy statements, procedure manuals, and
periodic reports. Discussions provide an important opportunity for management to elaborate on the
factors listed above, as well as answer specific questions, so as to enable Standard & Poor's analysts to
R ssess the factors as thoroughly as possible.
www.standardandpoors.com
R
't
CITY OF EDINA
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
STATEMENT OF INVESTMENT POLICY
1. POLICY
It is the policy of the City to invest public funds in a manner which maximizes return and
provides maximum security in preserving and protecting funds while meeting the daily cash flow
demands and conforming to all applicable federal, state and /or local statutes governing the
investment of public funds..
2. SCOPE
This investment policy applies to all financial assets of the City of Edina and Housing and
Redevelopment Authority (the "City") except those (if any) which are governed in another manner
by specific reference in federal, state and /or local statutes. All assets to which this policy applies are
accounted for in the City's comprehensive annual financial report and include:
General Fund
Special Revenue Funds
Debt Service Funds
Capital Project Funds
Enterprise Funds
Trust and Agency Funds
Internal Service Funds
Any other newly created fund
3. STANDARDS
The Finance Director is responsible for implementing these policies. The standard of
prudence to be used shall be the "Prudent Investor rule," an will be applied in the context of
managing an overall portfolio: "investments shall be made with judgment and care - under
circumstances then prevailing - which persons of prudence, discretion and intelligence exercise in
the management of their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the
probable safety of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived."
City employees meeting this standard will be relieved of personal responsibility for an
individual security's credit risk or market price changes, provided deviations from expectations are
reported in a timely fashion and appropriate action is taken to control adverse developments.
1
IN
t'.
The Finance Director and the investment committee shall not knowingly engage in any
personal business activities which could impair their ability to make impartial investment
decisions.
Bonding of the Finance Director shall be required. The City Manager will establish specific
bonding levels.
4. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES
The preservation of principal shall be the paramount objective of the investment program
of the City of Edina. Investments shall be selected in a manner that will attempt to ensure the
safety of the City's capital. This will be accomplished through a program of diversification and
maturity limitations for each individual pool or fund of investments. These limitations will be
determined by the Finance Director and the investment advisory committee and will be kept on
file with the finance Director. The objective will be to mitigate credit risk and interest rate risk.
a. Credit Risk
The City will minimize credit risk, which is the risk of loss due to the failure of the security
issuer or backer by:
• Limiting investments to the types of securities listed in Section 5 of this investment policy
• Pre - qualifing the financial institutions, broker /dealers, intermediaries, and advisors with
which the City will do business in accordance with Section 7 of this investment policy.
• Diversifying the investment portfolio so that the impact of potential losses. from any one
type of security or from any one individual. issuer will be minimized in accordance with
Section 8 of this investment policy.
b. Interest Rate Risk
The City will minimize interest rate risk, which is the risk that the market value of securities in
the portfolio will fall due to changes in market interest rates, by:
• Structuring the investment portfolio so that securities mature to meet cash requirements
for ongoing operations, thereby avoiding the need to sell securities on the open market
prior to maturity
• Investing operating funds primarily in shorter -term securities, money market mutual funds,
or similar investment pools and limiting the average maturity , of the portfolio in
accordance with this policy.
5 AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS
Investment instruments authorized and permitted by this policy are as follows:
A. Obligations of the Untied States or its agencies under a repurchase agreement if the
margin agreement under the repurchase agreement is 101 percent and with any of
the following institutions.
1) a bank qualified as depository of public funds,
PA
r
2) any national or state bank in the United States which is a member of the
Federal Reserve System and whose combined capital and surplus equals or
exceeds $10,000,000,
3) a primary reporting dealer in the United States government securities to the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York,
4) a securities broker -- dealer , having its principal executive office in Minnesota,
licensed pursuant to Chapter 80A, or an affiliate of it, regulated by the
Securities and Exchange commission and maintaining a combined capital and
surplus of $40,000,000 or more, exclusive of subordinated debt.
B. Governmental bonds, notes, bills, mortgages and other securities, which are direct
obligations or are guaranteed or insured issues of the United States, its agencies, its
instrumentalities, or organizations created by an act of Congress, excluding
mortgage- backed securities defined as "high risk" (as defined below) or in
certificates of deposit secured by letters of credit issued by federal Home Loan
Banks.
High risk mortgage- backed securities are as follows:
1) interest --only or principal -only mortgage- backed securities,
2) any mortgage derivative security that:
a) has an expected average life greater than ten years,
b) has an expected average life that:
i) will extend by more than four years as the result of an
immediate and sustained parallel shift in the yield curve of
plus 300 basis points: or
ii) will shorten by more than six years as the result of an
immediate and sustained parallel shift in the yield curve of
minus 300 basis points: or
c) will have an estimated change in price of more than 17 percent as the
result of an immediate and sustained parallel shift in the yield curve
of plus or minus 300 basis points.
Shares of an investment company registered under the Federal Investment
company Act of 1940, whose shares are registered under the Federal Securities Act of 1933, and
whose only investments are in:
3) securities described in "B" above, (with the exception that "high- risk" mortgage -
backed securities are permissible investments for an investment company),
4) general obligation tax - exempt securities rated AA or better by a national bond
rating service, and
5) repurchase or reverse repurchase agreements fully collateralized by securities
described above if the agreements are only entered into with an entity which is:
a) a primary reporting dealer to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York,
or
b) one of the 100 largest U.S. commercial banks.
3
r
II
C. State and local government obligation as follows:
1) Any security which is a general obligation of any state or local government with
taxing powers which is rated "AA" or better by a national bond rating service.
2) Any security which is a revenue obligation of any state of local government with
taxing posers which is rated "AA" or better by a national rating service.
3) A general obligation of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency which is a
moral obligation of the State of Minnesota and is rated "AA" or better by a
national rating agency.
D. Banker's acceptances of United States Corporation or their Canadian subsidiaries
that is rated "Al" by Moody's Investors Service and /or P1 by Standard and Poor's
Corporation and matures in 270 days or less.
E. Commercial paper issued by United States corporations or their Canadian
subsidiaries that is rated by at least two nationally recognized rating agencies; "A1"
by Moody's Investors Service, "P1" by Standard and Poor's Corporation, "F1" by
Fitch, and matures in 270 days or less.
F. Guaranteed investment contact (gic) issued_ , or guaranteed by a United States
commercial bank or domestic branch of a foreign bank or a United States
insurance company or its Canadian or United States subsidiary provided it ranks
on a parity with the senior unsecured debt obligations of the issuer or guarantor.
And
1) if it is a long -term gic, either:
a) the long -term senior unsecured debt 1 of the issuer or guarantor is
rated, or obligations backed by letters of credit of the issuer or
guarantor if forming the primary basis of a rating of such obligations
would be rated, in the highest or next highest rating category of
Standard & Poor's Corporation, Moody's Investors Service, Inc., or a
similar nationally recognized rating agency, or
b) if the issuer is a bank with headquarters in Minnesota, the long -term
senior unsecured debt of the issuer is.rated, or obligations backed by
letters of credit of the issuer if forming the primary basis of a rating of
such obligations would be rated in one of the three highest rating
categories of Standard & Poor's Corporation, Moody's Investor
Service, Inc., or a similar nationally recognized rating agency.
2) if it is a short -term gic, the short -term unsecured debt of the issuer or guarantor
is rated, or obligations backed by letters of credit of the issuer or guarantor if
forming the primary basis of a rating of such obligations would be rated, in the
highest two rating categories of Standard & Poor's corporation, Moody's
Investors Service, Inc., or similar nationally recognized rating agency.
G. Certificates of deposit at state and federally chartered banks and savings and loan
associations. All investments made under this subsection shall be limited to the
4
amount of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or the Federal Savings and Loan
Insurance Corporation or shall be secured in the manner set forth in Minnesota
statute 118.005. The certificate of deposit should be in the form of a discounted
security maturing in the amount not to exceed the insurance coverage or in the
amount so that at any time the face amount together with any accrued interest does
not exceed the insurance coverage.
H. The City will not purchase securities that are considered highly sensitive. A highly
sensitive investment is a debt instrument with contract terms that make the
investments fair value highly sensitive to interest rate changes. Examples include
range notes, index amortizing notes, step -up notes and bonds, variable -rate
investments with coupon multipliers, and coupons that vary inversely with a
benchmark index.
I. The City will not purchase securities that could expose the City to foreign currency
risk.
J. Proceeds from the issuance of tax - exempt debt securities shall be invested, recorded
and reported in the manner set forth by the U.S. Treasury Department and the
Internal Revenue Service so as to preserve the tax - exempt status of the debt
securities.
6. SAFEKEEPING AND CUSTODY
Investments may be held in safekeeping with:
A. Any Federal Reserve Bank,
B. _ Any bank authorized under the laws of the United States or any state to exercise
corporate trust powers, including but not limited to the bank from which the
investment is purchased,
C. A primary reporting dealer in United States government securities to the Federal
Reserve Bank of New York, or
D. A securities broker - dealer having its principal executive office in Minnesota,
licensed pursuant to Chapter 80A, or an affiliate of it, regulated by the securities
and exchange commission and maintaining a combined capital and surplus of
$40,000,000 or more, exclusive of subordinated debt.
The City's ownership of all securities in which the fund is invested should be evidenced by
written acknowledgments identifying the securities by:
A. The Names of issuers,
B. The Maturity dates,
C. The Interest rates,
D. Any Serial Numbers or other distinguishing marks.
E
•
The broker /dealer may not invest in securities that are both uninsured and unregistered and are
exposed to custodial credit risk in either the following situations:
a. Investments are held by the counterparty: or
b. Investments are held by the counterparty's trust department or agent, but not in the name
of the City.
7. SECURITY DEALERS, INSTITUTIONS, AND CONSULTANTS
The Finance Director shall maintain a list of security dealers and financial institutions
authorized to provide investment services to the City of Edina. The Finance Director shall develop
appropriate criteria, when necessary, for the further evaluation and selection of specific broker.
dealers, institutions, consultants and /or external money managers. Prudence, rating services,
analysis of current financial statement, key ratios and other statistical data compilation and /or
specific other knowledge are expected to be utilized as components of the evaluation and selection
criteria. A current financial statement of each broker-dealer, institution, consultant and /or
external money manager which the City is using in execution of this policy must be kept on file by
the Finance Director. The broker /dealer must sign the Broker Notification and Certification
form required by Minnesota Statutes 118A, including this investment policy, prior to any
investment transactions with the City. The Broker Notification and Certification must be updated
annually.
A. Qualified broker-dealers will be those security broker-dealers who maintain an
office in the state and who are selected according to credit worthiness and approved
by the Finance Director and the investment advisory committee. Only broker.
dealers who are recognized as "primary dealers" by the Market Reports Division of
the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and /or regional dealers that qualify under
Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15C3.1 (uniform net capital rule) may
be used for City investment placement.
B. Qualified institutions will be those banks, savings banks and saving and loans
institutions which are generally recognized by applicable federal, state and local
statutes as being authorized to receive investments from the City. Approved
institutions will be those named generally above, whom also meet further selection
criteria developed by the city including maintaining an investment office within the
Twin Cities metropolitan area and having other Minnesota local government
clients. Approval is to be determined jointly by the Finance Director and the
investment advisory committee.
C. External consultants may be engaged and used when necessary and prudent to
further and /or enhance the execution of this policy. A consultant is defined for the
purposes of this policy as being an individual or firm having expertise relative to
execution of this policy who may be engaged to serve in and advisory role without
the purpose of receiving investment deposits from the City for the further purpose
of generating a return on the placement. Approval of a consultant must be given
2
jointly by the Finance Director and the investment advisory committee. No funds
are to be placed directly with a consultant.
D. External money managers may be engaged and used in the execution of this policy
as long as the external money manager(s) is limited to investment activities within
the confines of this policy. An external money manager must maintain appropriate
diversification as noted later in this policy. Any external money manager engaged
by the City will be required to provide an accounting and performance report to
the Finance Director at a frequency not less than quarterly. External money
managers must be approved by the Finance Director and the investment advisory
committee.
8. INVESTMENT PARAMETERS
The investments shall be diversified by:
• Limiting investments to avoid over - concentration in securities from a specific issuer or
business sector (excluding U.S. Treasury Securities)
• Limiting investment in securities that have higher credit risks
• Investing in securities with varying maturities, and
•. Continuously investing a portion of the portfolio in readily available funds such as local
government investment pools, money market funds or overnight repurchase agreements to
ensure that appropriate liquidity is maintained in order to meet ongoing obligations. ,
9. QUARTERLY REVIEW
This investment policy, the schedule of diversification and maturity limitations by pool or
group of investable funds, authorized brokerdealers, authorized investments and all other aspects
of these investment policies will be reviewed on a quarterly basis. The Finance Director shall
prepare ' by the 25' of the month following the end of each calendar quarter, a report of
investments held, including the market value, interest rate, and maturity date of each security with
investment activity by broker and maturity date within each fund holding investments. The report
shall also show portfolio investment returns by fund. The Finance Director and the investment
advisory committee made up of the City Manager, Assistant City Manager the Assistant Finance
Director, and the Park Director will review the information and make any proposed modifications.
The scheduled quarterly process shall not inhibit desirable modifications to the policy at other
times during the year.
2007 Investment Policy
7
i
CITY OF EDINA
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT POLICIES
PURPOSE
The City of Edina has a responsibility to provide quality services to its residents, and
considers it important to do so in a. fiscally responsible fashion designed to keep services
and taxes as consistent as possible over time. These financial management policies are
meant to serve as the framework upon which consistent operations may be built and
sustained.
OPERATING BUDGET POLICIES
Scope. The City considers our operating budget to consist solely of the General Fund.
The City is required to report levy and expenditure amounts for our Debt Service Fund
for Truth -In- Taxation (TNT) purposes, but these levies and expenditures are usually
related to capital spending decisions and are therefore excluded from this operating
budget policy.
Accounting. The. General Fund uses the modified accrual basis of accounting for
budgeting and reporting purposes. Revenues are recognized as soon as they are both
measurable and available. Expenditures generally are recorded when a liability is
incurred, as under.accrual accounting, however expenditures related to compensated
absences and claims and judgments are recorded only when.payment is due.
Stakeholder Input. The annual budget process is intended to weigh all competing
requests for City resources within expected fiscal constraints. Requests for new programs
made outside the annual budget process are discouraged. The City will provide ample
time and opportunity for public input into its budget process every year, including the
required TNT hearing.
Balanced Budget Adoption. The operating budget for the City will be balanced. The
City will not use internal or external short-term borrowing, asset sales, or one -time
accounting changes to balance the operating budget. The balanced budget will include a
reasonable annual appropriation for contingencies.
Budgetary Controls. The legal level of budgetary control is at the department level
within the General Fund even though budgetary data is presented at lower levels
(personal. services, contractual services, commodities, central services, and capital
outlay). Expenditures may not legally exceed appropriations by department unless offset
by increases in revenues or unless the purchase was made in accordance with the City's
Equipment Replacement Program. All unencumbered appropriations lapse at year -end.
2/15/2007 Page 1
i
The City Manager may approve budgetary transfers.. The. City Council may approve
supplemental appropriations.
Monitoring. Department Directors are responsible for administration of their respective
department budgets. Such responsibility includes reviewing monthly financial reports to
detect errors and assess progress, staying within budget authorization,. and submitting
requests for budget adjustments, when required.
REVENUE POLICIES
Policies. The City will endeavor to maintain a diversified and stable revenue system to
shelter programs,and services from short-term fluctuations in any single revenue source.
Property Taxes. It is beneficial for residents and for the City to keep tax rates low and
consistent from year to year. The City will strive to proactively avoid large increases in
the operating budget levy.
Fees and Charges. The City shall establish user charges and fees for General Fund
program activities at a level related to the full cost of providing the services. Components
of the user charges shall include direct and indirect costs of providing the service. The
City will also consider policy objectives and market rates when setting fees.
Transfers. Transfers should not be used as a revenue source to balance the operating
budget except for the annual transfer from our liquor operations.
Investment Income. The City will reasonably budget for investment revenue in our
operating budget based on the conservative investment strategy outlined in our
investment policy (under separate cover).
FUND BALANCE POLICIES
Definitions. The term fund balance describes the net assets of the City's General Fund
calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). GAAP
further divides fund balance into three categories; reserved fund balance, unreserved
designated fund balance, and unreserved undesignated fund balanced. Reserved fund
balance is used to isolate the portion of fund balance not available for appropriation.
Unreserved designated fund balance represents management's intended use of resources,
or self - imposed limitations on the use of otherwise available resources.
Policies. At the end of each fiscal year, the City will maintain reserved fund balance
equal to the amounts required by GAAP for a variety of purposes, including but not
limited to; encumbrances, assets restricted by enabling legislation, prepaid expenditures,
and advances to other funds.
2/15/2007 Page 2
At the end of each fiscal year, the City will maintain unreserved designated fund balance
for Park Dedication as calculated by the previous years' balance plus park dedication fees
received during the year and less expenditures of park dedication funds during the year.
At the end of each fiscal year, the City will maintain unreserved designated fund balance
for Investments as calculated by the difference between market value and amortized
value of investments held by the City at year -end.
At the end of each fiscal year, the City will maintain unreserved designated fund balance
for Equipment Replacement according to the City's equipment replacement program.
At the. end of each fiscal year, the City will maintain unreserved designated fund balance
for Compensated Absences of 40% of the actual full - accrual General Fund liability for
compensated absences.
At the end of each fiscal year, the City will maintain unreserved designated fund balance
for Cash Flow in a range equal to 40 -45% of the subsequent year's budgeted tax revenue.
Should the actual amount designated for cash flow fall below the desired range, the City
shall create a plan to restore the appropriate levels. When the actual amount designated
for cash flow falls above the desired range, any excess funds will automatically be
transferred to the Construction (Revolving) Fund to support capital improvements.
Available fund balances shall not be used for ongoing operating expenditures.
CAPITAL OUTLAY POLICIES
Equipment Replacement Program. The City strives to maintain its physical assets at a
level that minimizes future repair and maintenance costs. To accomplish this goal, the
City has established the Equipment Replacement Program to annually budget and set
aside funds for the timely replacement of City equipment.
The City's Equipment Replacement Program includes equipment used for General Fund
programs.
Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The goal of the City's CIP is to develop a
comprehensive program for use by decision makers to guide capital investments based on
an assessment of the community's needs, taking into account the best use of limited
resources while providing efficient and effective municipal services.
The City will develop a five -year plan for capital improvements and update it annually.
The CIP process includes analyzing projects contributing to the public health and
welfare, projects helping to maintain and improve the efficiency of the existing systems,
and projects that define a future need within the community.
2/15/2007 Page 3
The City will identify'the estimated cost and potential funding sources for each capital
project proposal in the CIP. Purchase contracts for equipment and projects included in the
CIP must still be properly authorized according to the City's Purchasing Policy.
The CIP will include equipment and projects from any City fund, other than the
equipment that falls under the Equipment Replacement Program.
DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICIES
Policy Limits. The City will use debt only for capital improvement or projects that have
a life of more than 4 years. The City will avoid using debt for cash flow borrowing,
operations, or repairs.
When possible, the City will not use debt to finance equipment purchases when it is
possible to purchase the equipment on a pay -as- you -go basis with equipment replacement
program or capital improvement plan reserves.
The City shall use G.O. tax increment bonds only when the development merits special
consideration.
The City's capital improvement plan shall contain debt assumptions which match this
policy and requires a commitment to long -range financial planning which looks at
multiple years of capital and debt needs.
Legal Limits. Minnesota Statues, Section 475 prescribes the statutory debt limit that
outstanding principal of debt cannot exceed 2% of taxable market value. This limitation
applies only to debt that is wholly tax- supported. The type of debt included is either
general obligation debt of any size bond issue (G.O:) or lease revenue bond issues that
were over $1,000,000 at the time of issuance. However, there are also several other types
of debt that do not count against the limit..G.O. tax increment, G.O. special assessment,
G.O. utility revenue, G.O. recreational facility revenue, and HRA- issued debt are
considered to have a separate revenue source. other than just taxes and are excluded from
the legal debt limit calculation. Local ordinances do not limit the City's ability to issue
debt.
Issuance Practices. The City uses the competitive sale method for its general obligation
bond sales unless factors such as structure, size or market conditions compel the use of a
negotiated sale.
The City may use an outside bond attorney, an independent financial advisor, and/or
other service providers to assist with the structuring and sale of the bonds.
Debt Structuring. The City's collective debt shall amortize at least 50% of its principal
within 10 years. In all cases, the maturity shall be shorter than the life of the related
assets.
2/15/2007 Page 4
Conduit Debt. The City may participate in conduit debt financings. Development
proposals are reviewed to determine if they meet program objectives and whether the
proposals are financially feasible.
Variable Rate Debt. The City may use variable rate debt to provide debt structuring
flexibility and potential interest savings to the total debt portfolio. Variable rate debt
should not constitute more than 20% of the City's total debt obligations.
Refunding. Current refunding bonds may be utilized when present value savings of 3%
of refunded principal is achieved or in concert with other bond issues to save costs of
issuance.
Advance refunding bonds may be utilized when present value savings of 4% of refunded
principal is achieved.
2/15/2007 Page 5
Page 1 of 1
Darlene Wallin
From: Jennifer Bennerotte
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 10:57 AM
To: Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Joni Bennett; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com
Cc: Darlene Wallin
Subject: FW: Environmental Commission Action
Jennifer Bennerotte
Communications & Marketing Director
City of Edina
952 - 833 -9520
FAX 952- 826 -0390
jennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us
From: Marley Hanson [mailto:marleyhanson @comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 4:39 PM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: Environmental Commission Action
( *Please forward this to Mayor Hovland *)
Dear Mayor Hovland,
Currently the city is considering reviving the Environmental Commission as a separate entity apart from
the Planning Commission.
As a member of Edina High School's Project Earth, I would like to express my full support for this
measure.
I brought this up at a recent Project Earth meeting, and members supported the formation of this
commission unanimously.
From our point of view, there is absolutely no reason not to form an independent environmental
commission. It can bring nothing but good to our community.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Marley Hanson
2/15/2007
Darlene Wallin
'7rom:
Jennifer Bennerotte
ant:
Thursday, February 08, 2007 1:14 PM
fo:
Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Joni Bennett; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com
Cc:
Darlene Wallin
Subject:
FW: Joni Bennett
Jennifer Bennerotte
Communications & Marketing Director
City of Edina
952 -833 -9520
FAX 952 -826 -0390
jbennerotte@ci.edina.mn.us
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Robert Thompson [mailto:rthompsonl23@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 11:08 AM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: Joni Bennett
Hello Joni
I strongly support and endorse Jean Rehkamp Larson to fill vacant position on Heritage
Preservation Board. Thank you.
Your leadership and work on the Council is appreciated.
Bob Thompson
4523 Bruce
952 - 929 -0844
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.30/674 - Release Date: 2/7/2007
3:33 PM
1
February 9, 2007
Mr. Jim Hovland
Mayor, City of Edina
4501 W. 50" Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mr. Mayor:
I am responding to your guest column in the February 8 Edina Sun - Current newspaper.
I did not hear Mr. Steger speak at the January 11 event, but I have heard him speak
before. And, while he tells interesting stories and has had incredible personal
experiences, I'm afraid that his "thousands of miles" logged by dog sled in the polar
regions "over the past two decades" pale in the reality of millions of years of Earth .
history. His observations are anecdotal, at best, and aren't fact.
J. Drake Hamilton described "the three primary sources of global warming," but
apparently neglected to mention anything related to "the sun." An oversight? Not when
she has an agenda to promote.
I strongly ask that you move slowly in your desire to lead Edina into the hysteria of the
global warming fanatics. Facts are necessary. Theories and public opinion polls are
worthless. Resolutions passed by politically influenced organizations are perhaps biased.
A redundant "Energy/Enviror mental Commission" is certainly ill- conceived and a waste
of limited city resources.
The United Nations has told us that livestock around the world produce far more CO2
than humans do. Are they the perpetrators of the climate change you credit as an
"insidious form of human rights violation ?"
You recommend no hesitation to act individually and as a community to reduce the
effects of climate change. I prefer hesitation, personally, and request it of my Mayor.
"Experts" can't tell us if it is going to rain tomorrow or what the temperature will be
within even 10 degrees. I don't yet trust them to know accurately what cause and effects
there has been over millions of years — most of those- without any human presence at all.
Sincerely,,
Kiptdn J. Lundquist, MD
5933 Tamarac Ave.
Edina, MN 55436 v
r
To the Edina City Council:
I ask you to make energy a priority by creating an Ener
//�� S� �� support Edina Mayor Jim•Hovland signing the
'l�`� Mavors' Statement on Global Warmine This statement supports
reduced greenhouse gas emissions, increased sources of
. renewable energy, and energy conservation.
Name: l J d41-
Address: FQf , A5./ l �
� r � `LaF,I� � .1-�e � Y �( "�9 � -2 �►:a � 9 y � w «,� r� a w
ro.�t -�nr�l a.r�s � ruo�so
To the Edina ity Council:
I ask you to ake one a priority by creating an Epmw y
Commission. I support Edina Mayor Jim Hovland signing the
Mayors' Statement on Global Warming This statement supports
reduced greenhouse gas emissions, increased sources of
renewable energy, and energy conservation.
FAME
Address: I M R L° p majA J o Cou 11, , d , A) .' 54'39
V
To the Edina City Council:
I ask you to make
energy a priority by creating an Energy
Commission. I support Edina Mayor Jim Hovland signing the
Mayors' Statement on Global WanninP-. This statement supports
• reduced greenhouse gas emissions, increased sources of
renewable energy, and energy conservation.
Name:
62
Address:
To the Edina City Council:
I ask you to make energy a priority by creating an Energy
Commission. I support Edina Mayor Jim Hovland signing the
Mayors' Statement on Global Warming. This statement supports
reduced greenhouse gas emissions, increased sources of
renewable energy, and energy conservation.
Name: r"
a
I t�
Address: ,5,2_6-0 Vz'-"W't' O've' _5j
(rz&A-aU
�.,44
LI
To the Edina City Council: ,!65� )1
I ask you to make energy a priority by creating an Energy c Y ° `
Commission. I support Edina Mayor Jim Hovland signing the
Mayors' Statement on Global Warmin This statement supports
reduced greenhouse gas emissions, increased sources of
renewable energy, and energy conservation.
Name:
p
Address: �. �� I V 1 Ql i (11 lr) b l Cv Q�
A J 5 54L4.
To the Edina City Council:
I ask you to make energy a priority by creating an Energy
Commission. I support Edina Mayor Jim-Hovland signing the
This statement Mayors' Statement on�Gemissions, a increased sources of
supports
reduced greenhouse g
renewable energy, and energy conservation.
Name: -�
0
oz
To the Edina City Council: t~ v l �� r&aC4
and
I ask you to make energy a priority by creating an Energy
Commission. I support Edina Mayor Jim Rovland signing the
Mayors' Statement on Global Warming This statement supports
reduced greenhouse gas emissions, increased sources of
renewable energy, and energy conservation.
Name: ac-I . ,I; r—
Address: _ LI �61 ( Ic ""t� ('. iL I
AICf
III
V'
To the Edina City Council:
I ask you to make energy a priority by creating an Ener
Commission. I support Edina Mayor Jim Hovland signing the 11
Mayors' Statement on Global Warming_. This statement su rts
P `
reduced greenhouse gas emissions, increased sources of
renewable energy, and energy conservation.
LotSeawagcJ
- Name:
Address: S /�d� I�-d • l� CI �N�- 55134Q
0
To,the.Edina City_ Council:
I ask you to make energy a priority by creating :an Energy
Commission. I support Edina Mayor Jim Hovland signing the
Mayors' Statement on Global Warming. This statement supports
reduced greenhouse gas emissions,: increased sources of
renewable energy, and energy conservation.
Name:
Address:
To the Edin/Ci ouncil:
I ask o u to e V `rott C �v .r, K vi,"
y y a priority by creating an Commissio ort Edina Mayor Jim Hovland signing the
Mayors' Statement on Global Warming. This statement supports
reduced greenhouse gas emissions, increased sources of
renewable energy, and energy conservation.
Name:
Address: -7 o l
a
To the Edina City Council:
I ask you to make energy a priority by creating
an Energy
Commission. I support Edina Mayor Jim Hovland signing the
Mayors' Statement on Global W
reduced greenhouse gas emi 1---ar-m—ing-- dssources o t supports
s sionsincref
renewable energy, and energy conservation.
Name:
To the Edina City Council:
I ask you to make energy a.priority by creating an Energy
Commission. I support Edina Mayor Jim Hovland signing the
Mayors' Statement on Global Warming. This statement supports
reduced greenhouse gas emissions, increased sources of
renewable energy, and energy conservation.
Name: AW V-
Address: ' aD 6&572 1i
r
i
To the Edina City Council:
I ask you to make energy a priority by creating an Energy
Commission. I support Edina Mayor Jim Hovland signing the
Mayors' Statement on Global Warming This statement supports
reduced greenhouse gas emissions, increased sources of
renewable energy, and energy conservation.
Name: Aou^k- I , 0, J �,eyf a—q--
Address: (O �c(t ��, JZ7 T - �rsr���(��
r t t j - i4a Si ) �j r r_ }j t9 I it t iEti it
To the Edina City Council:
I ask you to make energy a priority by creating. an Energy
Commission. I support Edina Mayor Jim Hovland signing the
Mayors' Statement on Global Warming, This statement supports
reduced greenhouse gas emissions, increased sources of
renewable energy, and energy :conservation.
Name: �P11 C&�.Ur
Address: TDI y UA— I t l& n 6 6541
,'till. -f•.j
Monday, February 05, 2007
Mayor James B. Hovland
Edina City Hall
4801 West 50' Street
Edina, MN 55424
Dear Mayor Hovland,
I am a fifteen year-old resident of Edina and I have some issues I'd like to address
with you. I am concerned about the amount and height of condominiums in Edina. I don't
want our community to be turned into downtown with high -rise buildings. I believe you
should limit the amount of housing projects you approve and limit the height of condos. I
am not against the expansion of housing. We need more affordable housing in Edina.
Single family homes and condominiums are getting too pricy for the lower and middle
class. We need to welcome them into our community. I don't want this to interfere with
our reputation as a community that believes in excellence.
My second issue is the traffic in the area of 50* and France Avenue. The flow of
traffic is congested and because of that cars block intersections making it worse. It's also
very dangerous to pedestrians. My dad walks to work everyday and he has almost been
hit several times in crosswalks. Something needs to be done to improve the safety and
flow of traffic. I believe that it would improve if eastbound traffic on 5& cannot turn left
onto France Avenue.
In closing I'm proud to live in Edina and I want it to remain a safe and affordable
place to live. Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
i
Matthew J. Porter
5120 Halifax Ave. S.
Edina, MN 55424
7000 West Shore Drive
Edina. MN 55435
7 February 2007
Mayor James Hovland
Mr. Gordon Hughes
City of Edina
4801 W 50" Street
Edina MN 55424
Dear Mayor Hovland and Mr. Hughes,
I understand there is some interest in the City of Edina in having less of an impact on our
climate. I thought you might be interested to learn what our synagogue is doing. Adath
Jeshurun (which means Gathering of the Righteous) is a very large synagogue in
Minnetonka. Attached is the cover of the monthly bulletin, which details steps Adath has
undertaken recently. Some of these items may be things that Edina can implement, as
well.
A couple of definitions:
The Gan is the name of the nursery school (they operate a full nursery school
during the week)
Tikkun Olam means repair of the world
If you would like more information, I am certain Bernie Goldblatt or Rabbi Harold
Kravitz would be happy to speak with you.
Sincerely,
Shellie Specter
y' ,c 2 i 1 S. S ti EL: 5 1 3 5 V A 3 7 € =: .
Shabbat Beshalach/Tu B'Shevat
February 2-3
Meditation
Friday Evening Service
6:00 PM
Shabbat Morning Service
9:30 AM
Shiva Kohn Bat Mitzvah
Havaya K'tana
Havaya K'tana
10:00 AM
Shabbat Mincha
4:45 PM
Shabbat Yitro
February 9 -10
Friday Evening Service
6:00 PM
Meditation
8:32 Ann
Shabbat Morning Service
9:30 AM
Maxwell Mars Bar Mitzvah
Havaya K'tana
10:00 AM
Shabbat Mincha
5:00 Pm
Noah's Ark Havdalah
6:00 PM
Shabbat Mishpatim
February 16 -17
Friday Night Live with
6:00 PM
the Adath Choir
8:32 AM
Shabbat Morning Service
9:30 AM
Jeremy Steinman Bar Mitzvah
Shabbat Mincha
5:00 PM
Robbin Molnar Bat Mitrvah
5:15 PM
Shabbat Terumah
February 23 -24
Carlebach Service
6:00 PM
Meditation
8:32 AM
Shabbat Morning Service
9:30 AM
Bdanna Stein Bat Mitzvah
Speaker. Barbara Ribakove
Gordon
Shabbat Mincha
5:15 PM
Gabriella Povolotskiy Bat
5:30 PM
Mitzvah
Sundays
� Holidays
February 2
February 9
February 16
February 23
March 2
9:30 AM
5:45 PM
5:04 PM
5:14 PM
5:24 FM
5:34 PM
5:44 PM
Our Synagogue, Our World
Last month, our congregation had the first meeting of ,a new committee con -
cemed with environmental issues. Rabbi Kravitz spoke on this subject in one
of his High Holy Day. sermons and our congregants responded with great inter-
est. Space does not permit a full summary of the meeting but the key points'
are: (1) It is a moral imperative based on Jewish values that we stop polluting,
poisoning and destroying our planet. (2) It is a politically strategic imperative that
we reduce our dependence on foreign oil and lessen the global influence of
terrorist regimes on the U.S. and Israel. (3) It is our responsibility, therefore, to
reduce our energy consumption and limit the use of potentially dangerous
chemicals and handle them properly. By doing this in our synagogue we not
only are behaving responsibly toward the world but also conserving the
resources of Adath and saving money for our congregants. Committee members
who work with churches and other non- profits were deeply impressed that Adath
is already doing the following:
1 We installed a correcting capacitor on our electrical system which improved
our energy efficiency from 80% to over 95 %. After 3 months, Xcel Energy
tatted us because of our lower usage to see if our meter was broken.
2. We recycle paper and plastic.
3. We are changing out our less efficient incandescent light bulbs to more effi-
cient fluorescent, saving energy and money.
4. We turn off over 25 computers and monitors every night.
5. We heat and cool only areas we are using.. Non -use areas are kept at 55
degrees in winter and 85 degrees in the summer.
6. In every case possible we use non-toxic cleaning products; the Gan uses
them exclusively.
7. We have installed new controls on our heating/cooling systems such as
variable speed fans which save energy and dollars.
8. Instead of collecting them, we leave grass clippings on the lawn, reducing.'
the material in our trash by a huge amount.
9. We signed new service contrails for our heating/cooling systems to assure
operating efficiency.
10. We will soon be installing a modulating burner on our boilers so the flame
matches the load.
11. We are recycling batteries in a special way to dispose of them responsibly.
12. We are constantly scanning the latest electronic and print information for
new ways to save energy and dollars.
We, the lay leadership, clergy and staff of Adath invite each of our congregants
to look at how they consume energy, recycle and use products. Every one of .
us can make a difference. Please join us in this very special effort of TIKKUN
OLAM, repairing our works! To become involved in this effort at our synagc
please contact Rabbi Kravitz.
Bernie Goldblatt, Executive Director
FEBRUARY 07 1 1
Weekdays
7.20 AM
r\
5:45 PM
i
�!
i
H�
'1
Sundays
� Holidays
February 2
February 9
February 16
February 23
March 2
9:30 AM
5:45 PM
5:04 PM
5:14 PM
5:24 FM
5:34 PM
5:44 PM
Our Synagogue, Our World
Last month, our congregation had the first meeting of ,a new committee con -
cemed with environmental issues. Rabbi Kravitz spoke on this subject in one
of his High Holy Day. sermons and our congregants responded with great inter-
est. Space does not permit a full summary of the meeting but the key points'
are: (1) It is a moral imperative based on Jewish values that we stop polluting,
poisoning and destroying our planet. (2) It is a politically strategic imperative that
we reduce our dependence on foreign oil and lessen the global influence of
terrorist regimes on the U.S. and Israel. (3) It is our responsibility, therefore, to
reduce our energy consumption and limit the use of potentially dangerous
chemicals and handle them properly. By doing this in our synagogue we not
only are behaving responsibly toward the world but also conserving the
resources of Adath and saving money for our congregants. Committee members
who work with churches and other non- profits were deeply impressed that Adath
is already doing the following:
1 We installed a correcting capacitor on our electrical system which improved
our energy efficiency from 80% to over 95 %. After 3 months, Xcel Energy
tatted us because of our lower usage to see if our meter was broken.
2. We recycle paper and plastic.
3. We are changing out our less efficient incandescent light bulbs to more effi-
cient fluorescent, saving energy and money.
4. We turn off over 25 computers and monitors every night.
5. We heat and cool only areas we are using.. Non -use areas are kept at 55
degrees in winter and 85 degrees in the summer.
6. In every case possible we use non-toxic cleaning products; the Gan uses
them exclusively.
7. We have installed new controls on our heating/cooling systems such as
variable speed fans which save energy and dollars.
8. Instead of collecting them, we leave grass clippings on the lawn, reducing.'
the material in our trash by a huge amount.
9. We signed new service contrails for our heating/cooling systems to assure
operating efficiency.
10. We will soon be installing a modulating burner on our boilers so the flame
matches the load.
11. We are recycling batteries in a special way to dispose of them responsibly.
12. We are constantly scanning the latest electronic and print information for
new ways to save energy and dollars.
We, the lay leadership, clergy and staff of Adath invite each of our congregants
to look at how they consume energy, recycle and use products. Every one of .
us can make a difference. Please join us in this very special effort of TIKKUN
OLAM, repairing our works! To become involved in this effort at our synagc
please contact Rabbi Kravitz.
Bernie Goldblatt, Executive Director
FEBRUARY 07 1 1
EDINA PARK BOARD
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 12, 2006
7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mike Damman, Ray O'Connell, Gordon Roland, Andy Finsness,
Todd Fronek, Jeff Sorem, George Klus
MEMBERS ABSENT: Mike Weiss, Karla Sitek, Jeff Johnson, Linda Presthus
STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton
OTHERS PRESENT: Steve Rusk, Jack Keegan, Heidi Dorfineister, Sandy Fox, Bob
Shaw, Dianne P. Latham, Jean White, Suzanne Kerwin, Helese
Woelfel, David Lundberg, Jennifer Heinzel, Nancy Hall
I.
APPROVAL OF THE NOVEMBER 14.2006 PARK BOARD MINUTES
George Klus MOVED TO APPROVE THE NOVEMBER 14, 2006 PARK BOARD
MINUTES. Todd Fronek SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED.
II. NEW BUSINESS
A. Cable Television Filming Orientation — Jennifer Bennerotte — Ms. Bennerotte
informed the Park Board that recently the City Council held a weekend workshop to
try and start to establish some common visions and goals as they move forward. She
indicated that one of the things they achieved a consensus on was the idea of starting
to shed more responsibility at the board and commission level. However, to date they
have not yet formalized what that new role and responsibility will be. She stated that
she was just informed that the City Council is going to have another work shop
sometime in January to formalize their decision. Ms. Bennerotte commented that at
that point the City Council will then meet with all of the chairs of the boards and
commissions to discuss the details of their decisions. She noted that there has been
some talk that the public hearings for big issues would happen at the board and
commission levels instead of vice versa. She explained that right now there seems to
be a perception that the City Council public hearing trumps all public hearings below
it. Therefore, they are moving toward a format where the public hearings will be
emphasized at the board and commission level. Ms. Bennerotte pointed out that the
City Council also decided that the Park Board and Transportation Commission
meetings will now be televised over cable on the Community Channel 16. She noted
that the January 9`h Park Board meeting will be their first televised meeting.
Ms. Bennerotte went over meeting decorum of being on television. She explained
that individuals will be limited to three minutes in length to which there will be a
lighting system installed that indicates to the speaker and the chair when it's
appropriate to cut the speaker off. She noted that they are asking the public not to
repeat remarks or points of view that have already been presented because they are
trying to get out of the repetition of some of the public hearings. She stated that they
discourage cheering, jeering, clapping and even non - verbal communication such as
signs, buttons and t- shirts. There needs to be a fair playing field for everyone. In
addition, when the Park Board is deliberating they ask that the public not interrupt
and ask questions unless the chair decides to take comment. Ms. Bennerotte indicted
that staff, consultants and proponents for a topic be given a limit of 20 minutes and
power point presentations can be no longer than 20 slides in length. She noted that
any more than that may put the Park Board in a bad position of having to cut
someone off half -way through their presentation. In addition, Ms. Bennerotte noted
that the City Council is also moving toward being more formal in the conversations
with each for e.g., Linda Masica would be addressed as Council Member Masica.
She stated that the Park Board as a group can'decide how they want to address each
other but it's recommended not to use first names because the at home audience may
not know who is being referred to.
Ms. Bennerotte asked the Park Board that they not give speeches to the cable
television audience. She explained that if people are watching at home they will be
watching the meetings from month to month and they will have the background
information. She stressed that once people start making speeches to the at -home
audience they start to lose control of the meeting and it starts to become more about a
"show" than about a meeting.
B. 2007 Capital Improvement Plan — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the City
Council did have a couple of comments regarding the 2007 Capital Improvement
Plan. He indicated that Council Member Masica was of the opinion based on the
Needs Assessment Survey, as well as hearing from neighbors, that the playground
equipment at York Park really should be moved up to 2008. Mr. Keprios explained
that he is looking for a recommendation for the 2007 budget because the City Council
only approves budget dollars one year at a time and the rest of it is visionary because
it does change each year.
Mr. Keprios stated that one change he would request in looking at the 2007 Capital
Improvement Plan would be to install protective fencing at the Pamela Park Softball
Complex instead of protective netting. He explained that an architect was hired to
come up with some figures on what it would cost to put netting over the area as well
as see if there would be any ramifications. Unfortunately, the results showed that
they would have to lose some very beautiful trees and therefore, that was not the route
they felt they should go. Mr. Keprios indicated that he has asked Vince Cockriel,
Park Superintendent, to try to secure some other quotes to see if they could protect
just the spectator area as well as develop some permanent black vinyl fencing to
match the backstops. The fencing would protect those who sit in the bleachers right
2
behind each of the dugouts as well as it would protect them from any fly balls.
However, once they are out of that domain they would be exposed to some fly balls.
Mr. Keprios pointed out if they were to do that it would cost approximately $7,000 as
opposed to their first quote which was $60,000.
Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that he was recently informed by Mr. Cockriel
that there is a bridge at Bredesen Park that is in need of replacement which was
something that was unforeseen. He stated that the bridge is on the west side of the
park and it will cost approximately $20,000 to replace. Therefore, he would
recommend instead of spending $60,000 on netting at Pamela Park they will only
spend $7,000 on protective fencing and spend $20,000 to replace the bridge at
Bredesen Park.
Mr. Keprios commented that in looking at the results from the Needs Assessment
Survey they may want to move the field renovation project at Todd Park from 2008 to
2010. He explained that.by doing that it would allow them to move the replacement
of the playground equipment at York Park from 2010 to 2008. Mr. Keprios explained
that they may also want to consider moving the Countryside Park ball field
renovation out a year or two and then move a couple of playgrounds up. He
explained that if they were to do that they would essentially be able to replace six
playgrounds in a three year period which would be in sync with the results of the
Needs Assessment Survey. Mr. Keprios pointed out that the key thing is that they are
all in agreement with the 2007 Capital Improvement Plan and in the future perhaps
staff could come back with some follow -up recommendations.
-Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that for the Aquatic Center they are
recommending $30,000 in upgrades and replacements which will stay consistent with
2008. However, the Flow Rider is being moved out as late as 2011. He commented
that may be moved up sooner if Mr. MacHolda feels the pool is ready for that boost.
Mr. Keprios pointed out that for the next couple of years the arena is in a repair
maintenance mode and commented that in 2009 they will have to replace the
Zamboni. He stated that the good news for the arena is that on January 1, 2009 the
1988 issued bonds will be paid off at the arena. Mr. Keprios noted that the bad news
is that the West Arena still has the original refrigeration system from the 1960s.
Therefore, they are trying to be proactive and are hoping that they can wait until 2010
to spend a million dollars to replace the refrigeration system.
Mr. Keprios explained that at Braemar Golf Course they are still paying back bonds
and interest on money that was borrowed to develop the new nine, expand the
clubhouse and purchase and develop the Fred Richards Golf Course. Therefore, as a
result of that they are cash flow broke and are unable to spend the capital dollars they
would like to at this time. He noted that some of the bigger ticket items won't start
coming into play until 2010 when a cart path renovation is being proposed as well as
the parking lot will need to be resurfaced. Mr. Keprios commented that the big ticket
3
items that are scheduled for 2011 include redesigning holes 19 through 27, renovating
the driving range and replacing the first phase of the irrigation system.
Mr. Fronek stated that there will still be a $30,000 savings in the 2007 CIP due to cost
reductions planned for Pamela Park protective fencing vs. protective netting. He
noted that it will cost approximately $138,000 to renovate the ball fields at
Countryside Park in 2008 to which they are discussing pushing that out. Mr. Fronek
pointed out that a while back it was stated that Countryside Park is a great place for a
hockey rink because there is more adequate parking compared to Todd Park.
However, the orientation of Countryside Park was bad. Mr. Fronek suggested that
they look at taking a portion of the Pamela Park project reduction and put it into a
feasibility study to look at redesigning Countryside Park where they could have a
good hockey rink with good ice. Mr. Keprios replied that is a great recommendation
and perhaps they could ask for some of the balance of that money to be spent on a
feasibility study to explore some options to develop a master plan for Countryside
Park. Mr. Keprios added that they are still in their second year of a two -year pilot
project with the hockey rink at Todd Park and they are going to need to wait to see
how that plays out. Mr. Fronek asked how much it would cost to do a feasibility
study to which Mr. Keprios replied approximately $15,000. Mr. Fronek
recommended adding $15,000 for a feasibility study of Countryside Park.
Mr. Klus asked about the needs of some of the other parks, such at Bredesen Park and
the restroom situation they had there. He commented that maybe staff needs to look
at some of the other needs before $15,000 is committed to looking at Countryside
Park., Mr. Keprios replied that the Bredesen Comfort Station is operable and the
problems they had in the past were from vandalism. Mr. Keprios explained that what
he does intend to do for Bredesen Park is see if there are any dollars available as part
of any reserve fund that may be realized at the end of the 2006 budget, to spend on a
one -time basis only, to upgrade the pathways at Bredesen Park. He noted that it was
very clear from the Needs Assessment Survey that the number one thing is to
maintain the pathways at a high quality level.
Mr. Finsness asked Mr. Keprios if staff has thought about how they are going to truly
implement the results from the Needs Assessment Survey into the Capital
Improvement Plan. Mr. Keprios responded that he views the Needs Assessment
Survey as an ongoing tool that will play heavily into the Comprehensive Plan. In
addition, it will also play a part in how they are going to plan out the Capital
Improvement Plan for at least the next five years.
George Klus MOVED TO APPROVE THE 2007 CAPITAL PLAN. Mr. Fronek
asked if that includes both amendments discussed; $60,000 being reduced to $7,000
and putting the remainder of that money towards a bridge at Bredesen Park as well as
do a feasibility study of Countryside Park. Mr. Klus replied that is correct.
Jeff Sorem SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY
4
C. Update to "Priority Use of the Edina School District's Gymnasiums" — Mr. Keprios
informed the Park Board that the main difference between the Priority Use Guidelines
from September 9, 2005 and the Priority Use Policy from December 12, 2006 is the
incorporation and adoption of the Youth Task Force recommendation. Mr. Keprios
pointed out that the most significant change is the section "Organizations Which
Request Special Permits to Offer Ongoing Programs in the Gymnasiums are Required
to Comply with the Following Guidelines" has now been eliminated and has been
replaced by the new guidelines and youth sports values document. The core values
document will replace that whole section.
Mr. Keprios stated that Mr. MacHolda made a wonderful suggestion that under
Priority Three where they list the associations that are recognized and can have access
to the city's gymnasiums they need to note that hockey and lacrosse are not allowed
to use the gymnasiums. He explained that they have learned from the manufacturer
of the gym floor that it would be wise not to allow these two groups to use the
gymnasiums because they will ruin the floors. Mr. Keprios commented that they
were hoping that wouldn't be the case, however, it was a very strong recommendation
from the manufacturer. Therefore, Mr. MacHolda and he suggest that the Park Board
adopt this document that hockey and lacrosse be removed from Priority Three. Mr.
Keprios commented that the School District does not allow that kind of play in any of
their gyms either.
Ray O'Connell MOVED TO APPROVE THAT THE PRIORITY USE OF THE
EDINA SCHOOL DISTRICT'S GYMNASIUM POLICY DATED 12/12/06 WITH
THE EDINA HOCKEY ASSOCIATION AND EDINA LACROSSE
ASSOCIATION BE EXCLUDED UNDER PRIORITY THREE. Mike Damman
SECONDED THE MOTION.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
D. League Of Women Voter's Study — Suzanne Kerwin, member of the League of
Women Voters in Edina, asked the Park Board if they had any questions or comments
on the study that was done by the League of Women Voters. Mr. Finsness noted
there were some interesting comments made with regards to the City Council and it
seems as though something may be happening because of it. Ms. Kerwin stated that
their study was very timely and it is interesting the way the City Council is starting to
look at the Boards and Commissions. Ms. Kerwin stated that the study will be
presented to the City Council in January.
Mr. Keprios commented that he would like to applaud the League of Women Voters
for what they did. The study was very thorough, interesting and worthwhile. Mr.
Finsness noted that he agrees that it is a great document. Ms. Kerwin thanked the
Park Board members who filled out the survey for their study.
5
E. 2007 Park Board Meeting Schedule — George Klus MOVED TO APPROVE THE
AGENDA FOR 2007. Jeff Sorem SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION
CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
Mr. Keprios pointed that the Park Board Tour is scheduled for the June Park Board
meeting and will start at 5:00 pm. He noted that he will come up with a
recommendation of what parks he thinks they should visit and asked for the Park
Board's input before it is fmalized.
III. OLD BUSINESS
A. Needs Assessment Survey — Mr. Finsness asked Mr. Keprios if he had any further
comments on how the Needs Assessment Survey will be implemented into the
planning process for the upcoming years. Mr. Keprios replied that it will be a
wonderful tool as they go down the road and update their Comprehensive Plan. Mr.
Finsness asked Mr. Keprios to briefly explain the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Keprios
explained that the Comprehensive Plan is a 10 year vision for the City of Edina with
regards to all of the issues that it faces whether it be traffic, housing, parks, etc. He
indicated that they currently have a comprehensive plan that was updated
approximately 8 %2 years ago. He explained that it's a very lengthy and very public
process to update everything including the parks piece of it. Mr. Keprios commented
that he believes the city has hired a professional firm to assist the City with the
comprehensive plan process. He pointed out that the Park Board will be involved in
the process and asked if one or two Park Board members could be assigned to work
with Mr. MacHolda and himself to present the park and recreation findings. He noted
it may entail attending a few larger comprehensive plan meetings. Mr. Keprios
indicated that Mr. MacHolda and he will do the leg work as far as updating the
acreage and all of the detail part, however, a lot of the changes and additions will be
due to the results of the Needs Assessment Survey. He noted that he thinks they will
be inviting public input so that they can be sure they are on the right track and are in
sync with what the vision should be based on the data received from the Needs
Assessment Survey. Mr. Keprios explained that ultimately the Comprehensive Plan
will be adopted by the City. Council to present to the Metropolitan Council.
Mr. Keprios pointed out that the Comprehensive Plan is not a Capital Improvement
Plan but rather a vision so they know what direction to follow for the next ten years
and that is why the Needs Assessment Survey is such a valuable piece of data. It will
help them generate that vision and will hopefully be reflective of the majority view.
Mr. Finsness asked if the Comprehensive Plan will have more specific questions or
will it be more general to which Mr. Keprios replied that he thinks it will address
more general issues. However, it's up to the City Council and the community to
come up with what they feel the answers are to those issues.
Diane Plunkett Latham, 7013 Comanche Court, stated that she found the survey
outstanding. She noted that one of the things that came to the top was the bikes and
trails. She stated that the city already has a bike trail task force and feels they now
A
need a trails task force. In addition, she would also like to see a task force for the
natural and wildlife areas where they can find pockets of habitat to restore. There
could be different examples of habitat which could serve as an educational purpose as
well as there could be an oak savannah, a prairie area, a woodland area, etc. Ms.
Latham commented that the task force could work with the neighborhood to
determine where these could go and they could be adjacent to the walking paths.
Ms. Latham indicated that she thinks it's good that the City Council is recognizing
that perhaps some of the meetings are going too long as well as perhaps many of the
boards and commissions meetings are going too long. However, by limiting the
amount of testimony each individual can give in order to expedite business it really
does not give the community very much opportunity for input. Therefore, by having
these task forces they could then put together and present a consolidated report to the
various boards and commissions who would then give their report to the City
Council. .
Robert Shaw, resident of Nine Mile Village, informed the Park Board there are two
points he would like to make. The first is regarding buckthorn and the second is the
idea of an environmental commission or some sort of sub - committee to advise the
Park Board. Mr. Shaw stated that as far as buckthorn is concerned residents from
Nine Mile Village have been working for three years to eradicate buckthorn on their
property. He noted that at their expense they removed all of the buckthorn and in the
process they have increased the value of their property. Mr. Shaw indicated that they
live right next to Bredesen Park and that is where the buckthorn came from. He
stated that he looks for the day when the city will allow volunteers to get into
Bredesen Park and start removing the buckthorn. He pointed out that he realizes it's a
tremendous amount of work and it would take years, however, right now that park is
a disgrace. Therefore, he hopes that the city will get serious about improving
Bredesen Park and that it will become part of the city's vision.
Mr. Shaw pointed out that as far as an environmental commission the Park Board
would be well served to have a body of people who study the air, water, natural
plants, trees, shrubs, wildflowers, etc., and make recommendations to the Park board.
Mr. Klus commented that he would like Mr. Shaw to know that he doesn't think the
city at any time has discouraged residents from going into the parks and taking out
buckthorn. He stated that volunteers have been doing it for several years at Garden
Park as well as other parks. Ms. Latham clarified what Mr. Shaw was trying to say in
that it is true that volunteers are currently working to eradicate buckthorn in three or
four parks within the city. However, volunteers have not yet been permitted into
Bredesen Park because it is so large it would take an overall ecology plan to do it.
Ms. Latham pointed out that Bredesen Park is a big park and until Mr. Cockriel gets
an overall plan in place he cannot let volunteers work in Bredesen Park. Therefore,
Mr. Shaw would like to start working in Bredesen Park now but the Park and
Recreation Department is -not quite ready to let the volunteers help.
7
Mr. Klus asked Mr. Keprios if that is correct to which Mr. Keprios replied that
surprises him and he doesn't know the answer to that. Mr. Keprios stated that the city
did hire a consultant to evaluate the buckthorn issue in Edina. The consultant put
together a prioritized list of what seemed to make the most sense financially as well
as what made the most sense with the resources they have available. Mr. Keprios
stated that he believes the preference was to steer the volunteers to those priority
areas and that's where staff intended to spend its resources. He indicated that he is
not aware of any volunteers being told they cannot go into Bredesen Park. Mr.
Keprios commented that he will look into it and will discuss it with this staff. Mr.
Klus commented that he thinks if people in the community want to do volunteer work
in their parks then they should be allowed to do that. Therefore, it concerns him if
these volunteers are being told no. Mr. Keprios pointed out it's never just volunteers
when these things happen, it actually does involve staff resources and time. Mr. Klus
replied that is correct, the staff needs to pick it up. However, he's sure that staff
could find a time that would work with someone's schedule to pick up the buckthorn.
Mr. Keprios responded that he would be happy to make accommodations for
volunteers to be able to work on removing buckthorn in Bredesen Park.
Mr. O'Connell pointed out that in the Needs Assessment Survey 14% of the
respondents were interested in a nature center; however, only 3% were interested in
paying for it. He commented that rather than looking at building our own nature
center for two million dollars maybe they could work with Woodlake which is
surrounded by Bloomington and even possibly look at adding Eden Prairie.
Jennifer Heinzel, Edina High School student, informed the Park Board that this year
she is organizing the buckthorn removal at Edina High School. She explained how
she likes the idea of having a trail from Creek Valley Elementary to the Edina High
School, especially since both schools are working on restoration projects. She
indicated that the Edina High School restored their wetland area and is now working
on buckthorn removal.
Mr. Keprios stated that he would like to thank all of the Park Board members and all
of the public who participated in helping to make the survey as valuable as it is.
B. Lewis Park Hockey Rink Study — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the
Edina Hockey Association (EHA) and staff met with the consultant they hired to do a
feasibility study on whether or not they should consider building an outdoor
artificially refrigerated rink at Lewis Park. He noted that we learned that it would
cost approximately $800,000 to build. Mr. Keprios pointed out with the addition of
two new indoor rinks at Minnesota Made Ice Arena, at first glance it really does not
seem to make sense to go forward with the project. Mr. Keprios noted that EHA has
is interested in donating funds to purchase a downsized Zamboni that would fit in the
existing garage at Lewis Park. He indicated that the EHA and staff are currently
investigating that option.
Mr. Sorem pointed out that Lewis Park is one of the most heavily used rinks by non-
Edina residents and if a Zamboni is going to be at Lewis park he would like to see the
rink heavily scheduled with Edina programs.
Mr. Fronek asked if there has been any discussion about adding another rink at Lewis
Park that does not have refrigeration. Mr. Keprios replied they have discussed the
idea of building another rink that would be smaller and would accommodate the
mites. He stated that they are also considering the thought of making the rink so
small that they could put an oval skating rink around the perimeter of the smaller rink.
All of these ideas will require more analysis.
IV. UPDATES FROM STAFF
A. Gymnasium Construction — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that the gyms are
now operational and so far the initial feedback has been very positive. He
commented that they are working very closely with the Edina School District to be
sure they don't over schedule the campus as far as parking and traffic are concerned.
Mr. Keprios pointed out that it's written in the Facility Use Agreement that Doug
Johnson, Community Education Director, has the authority to pre -empt the City out
of the gyms if there is a conflict or if scheduled events exceed the capacity of the
campus and overburden the neighborhood.
Mr. Klus asked if there have been any complaints from people that say they still can't
find gym space. Mr. MacHolda replied that for Mondays, Tuesdays and Thursdays
from 6:00 pm to 8:00 pm, they could probably use three or four more gyms.
However, the idea is to maximize the facilities. Therefore, they've shifted some of
the times to Friday nights and Saturday mornings as well as the 10th through 12th
grade boys basketball are playing on Sunday afternoons.. Mr. MacHolda stated that
he hasn't heard any complaints about people finding gym space.
B. Courtney Fields Construction Project - Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that
they are getting near the end of the Courtney Construction Fields project. He noted
that they have not had one change order to date and are currently within budget.
V. ADJOURNMENT
George Klus MOVED THE ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 8:25 PM. Jeff Sorem
SECONDED THE MOTION. MEETING ADJOURNED.
W
f
Sayre
5013 Edinbrook Ln
Edina MN 55436 '.
cl
now CIIIOIS
E -Mail List
for School
Districts
Subscribe free, and
we'll e-mail into on
legislative updates
and initiatives,
upcoming seminars,
and more.
—Page 2
Case Study
City of Cannon
Falls Finances
Major 2006
Improvement
Projects Without
a Property Tax
Levy
—Page 3
Upcoming
Minnesota
Conferences
—Page 3
Statewide
Public Safety
Radio System
State of Minnesota
sells $35 million
in revenue bonds
to fund next phase
—Page 4
Northstar
Corridor
Commuter Rail
Project Moves
Forward
Page 4
Creative Approaches to School Finance
Joel Sutter and Gary Olsen, Financial Advisors, Ehlers Education Team
One of the most satisfying aspects of our jobs is
when we can work with our clients to come up
with a creative new approach that solves a
problem they are facing. Many times these new
approaches could be used by other school districts
as well, if they were aware of their options. In this
article, we will describe creative solutions that
three of our school district clients recently used,
with our assistance. We hope these success stories
will help to inspire similar creative financial
approaches in other districts.
Rosemount -Apple Valley -Eagan —
Refinancing Bonds with a Lease - Purchase
In 1996, School District 196 (Rosemount -Apple
Valley -Eagan) had decided to begin offering
services in- district for students with disabilities who
had previously received services through a
cooperative. The District had no excess space in
existing schools, and was unable to find suitable
space to lease in the community. So they partnered
with the Dakota County Housing and
Redevelopment Authority (HRA) to finance a new
school building on District -owned property in
Apple Valley. The HRA issued $7,425,000 in lease
revenue bonds to finance the construction and
equipping of the school, and the District was
responsible for design and construction. The HRA
and the District agreed to a long -term lease,
through which the District was obligated to make
lease payments equal to the principal and interest
on the bonds plus a small annual administrative fee
to the HRA. The District received State approval to
make an annual lease levy to finance its lease
payments.
The HRA bonds were set to mature in 2017, but
they were callable on February 1, 2007. The HRA
was willing to facilitate a current refunding of the
bonds, through the issuance of lease
revenue refunding bonds. This
would have reduced the District's
lease payments, while maintaining a
similar ownership and lease
structure.
The District and Ehlers explored all
Market Update: available options for refunding the
"Hurry Up and Wait" HRA bonds. Ehlers recommended
—Page 6 that the District consider issuing
new debt without the involvement
of the HRA, in order to reduce costs
by: 1) reducing up -front financing costs (due to
involvement of only one governmental unit, rather
than two), and 2) eliminating the annual
administrative fee to the HRA. After considerable
deliberation, Ehlers solicited proposals for two
different financing options on behalf of the District:
1. A direct lease purchase; and
2. Certificates of Participation, or COPS (COPS
are a financial instrument that is used to take a
larger lease - purchase and split it into smaller
pieces that can be sold to multiple parties).
The proposals for both financing options resulted
in similar savings to the District. In November of
2006, the school board approved a direct lease
purchase agreement with Wells Fargo Brokerage
Services. The net result will be a reduction in
future lease payments (and lease levies) of
approximately $425,000.
Spring Lake Park — Financing Artificial
Turf Field and Track with Lease Purchase
and Lease Levy
Spring lake Park School District's stadium, located
next to its High School, included a natural grass
field and a cinder block track. Both the track and
the field had serious drainage and other problems.
In fact, the track had deteriorated to the point that
it was not safe to use for the District's track
program.
The District explored options for reconstruction of
both the track and the field. Like many districts in
recent years, they considered the potential
advantages of an artificial turf field. Although
artificial turf has higher construction costs than
natural grass, it will have lower maintenance costs
and - most importantly - will allow for greatly
(CREATIVE APPROACHES continued on page 2)
z
MARK YOUR CALENDARS!
Ehlers 2007 School Finance Seminar,
"Financial Fitness for Healthy School Districts,"
will be held on Friday, April 13. This one -day
seminar for school business officials and
superintendents will be held at the Radisson
Hotel in Roseville. We plan to mail out a
brochure and post information on our Web site
(www.ehlers - inc.com) the last week of February.
Creative Approaches
(continued from page 1)
increased usage of the field. The District
determined that the most cost -effective
option was to replace the track with a
new synthetic turf track and to replace
the field with an artificial turf field. The
entire project, with related
improvements, was estimated to cost
approximately $1,250,000.
The District chose to finance the
construction through a lease- purchase
agreement. And, since both a track and an
athletic field fit the definition of
"instructional space" in the lease levy
statute (both are used for physical
education classes and cocurricular
programs), the lease payments are eligible
to be financed through the lease levy.
Ehlers solicited proposals for lease -
purchase financing on the District's
behalf. The best proposal was from
Wells Fargo Brokerage Services, for a 15-
year lease purchase with an interest rate
of 5.00 percent. The District applied to
MDE for approval of the lease levy in the
summer of 2006, and also applied for
Review and Comment on the project.
Both approvals were received.
Construction was completed in August
of 2006, and the new field was used for
football and soccer games, as well as
Ehlers Advisor • February 2007
practices and physical education classes,
this past fall.
Ehlers has assisted several other districts
with similar financial arrangements (a
lease- purchase agreement, with
payments funded by the lease levy) for
synthetic surface tracks, and is currently
working with two other districts on
financing of artificial turf fields.
White Bear Lake — Using Alternative
Facilities Bonds to Accelerate
Capital Improvements and Avoid
a Large Tax Increase
The White Bear Lake School District is
one of approximately 20 larger school
districts that qualify for the "full"
Alternative Facilities Bond and Levy
Program. This program allows these
districts to fund a variety of capital
projects - including health and safety
improvements, accessibility
improvements, and deferred maintenance
- through either an annual levy or the
issuance of bonds. The district must
submit a ten -year capital plan to the State,
and the State must approve both the ten -
year plan and each individual project. If
the State approves the projects, no voter
approval is required for the district to
finance the projects through the issuance
of bonds, an annual tax levy, or a
As we continue to look for better ways to serve our school district clients, we
are establishing a list of e-mail addresses which we will use to communicate
information of general interest to our clients. We plan to use the list to provide
information regarding legislative updates and initiatives, upcoming seminars,
changes in market conditions, truth in taxation services, aid anticipation
certificates, and other important topics. We intend to use the list sparingly, and
won't be flooding your inbox with daily or weekly messages.
We recently sent an e -mail message to clients, inviting them to subscribe to this
e -mail list. If you didn't get the message, or if you would like to add others to
the list, you can go to the following Web site to subscribe to the list:
http://ehlers-inc.info/emailUst/?p=subscribe&id=l
We are excited about this new tool and hope to use it to further our mission of
designing outstanding financial solutions for outstanding school districts! If you
have questions about the E -Mail List and its intended uses, please contact any of
the financial advisors on the Ehlers Education Team.
Carolyn Drude
651 - 697 -8511
carolyn @ehlers - inc.com
Kristin Hanson
651- 697 -8512
khanson @ehlers- inc.com
Gary Kawlewski
651 -697 -8551
gkawlewski @ehlers - inc.com
Betsy Knoche
651- 697 -8537
bknoche @ehlers - inc.com
Gary Olsen
651 -697 -8513
gary@ehlers - inc.com
Joel Sutter
651 -697 -8514
joel @ehlers - inc.com
-2-
combination of both.
(Although only a few districts qualify for
the full alternative facilities program, all of
the other districts in the State qualify for
more limited version of this program. For
them, the financing is available only for
health and safety projects that cost more
than $500,000 per site.)
In recent years, the White Bear Lake
School District has used an annual "pay
as you go" levy to finance all projects
eligible for alternative facilities funding.
The annual levies had ranged from
$2,131,000 to $4,000,000. In 2006,
however, they accumulated a list of
deferred maintenance and health and
safety projects with estimated costs of
almost $16,500,000. Continuing to fund
these projects with an annual levy would
have required the District to either:
a) significantly increase their tax levy, or
b) spread the projects out over four or
more years. Spreading the projects out
would have increased total project costs,
due to inflation in construction costs and
increased mobilization costs for
contractors.
The District and Ehlers explored various
options for financing the projects
through alternative facilities bonds. The
District chose a bond issue of
$16,500,000, with an eight -year
repayment schedule. Payments on the
bonds were structured so that the tax
rate for all the District's capital- related
levies (including existing bonds, the new
bonds, and future "pay -as- you -go" levies)
would remain relatively constant. Ehlers
solicited competitive proposals and
received 10 bids resulting in a true
interest rate of 3.60 percent.
This plan resulted in three benefits to
the District.
1. It avoided a large tax increase.
2. It will allow the District to benefit
from the facility improvements
sooner.
3. It reduced the ultimate costs of the
improvements by avoiding further
cost inflation and increased
mobilization costs.
The option to use either bonds or an
annual levy for alternative facilities
projects gives districts many options for
scheduling both the timing of the
projects and the timing of tax levies to
pay for the projects. Ehlers has used
similar approaches to funding alternative
facilities projects with many other
districts, including some districts that
only qualify for the more limited version
of the program.
Ehlers Advisor • February 2007
Date
Issuer
Issue Name
Amount
First Maturity
Last Maturity
Rate
Rating
11/16/06
Minneapolis I City of
GO Improvement Bonds, Series 2006
$3,780,000
12/01/07
12/01/26
4.08
Aaa/AAA/AAA
11/16/06
Annandale I ISD No. 876
G.O. School Building Refunding Bands, Series 2006A
$2,310,000
02/01/08
02/01/19
3.94
Aa2
11117106
Warroad ISD No. 690
Taxable G.O. School Building Bonds, Series 2006C
$282,000
11/17/06
11/17/06
9.00
NR
1/17106
lake Of a Woods I ISD No. 390
Taxable G.O. School Building Bonds, Series 2006B
$170,000
11/17/06
11/17/06
9.00
NR
1117/06
Foley I ISD No. 51
Taxable G.O. School Building Bond, Series 20068
$685,000
11/17/06
11/17/06
9.00
NR
11/17/06
South Koochiching -Rainy River ISD No. 363
Taxable G.O. School Building Bond, Series 2006A
$208,000
11/17/06
11/17/06
9.00
NR
11/21/06
Lino Lakes City of
GO Water Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2006F
$1,745,000
02/01/08
02/01/12
3.67
Aa3
11/21/06
Kingsland ISD No. 2137
GO School Building Bonds, Series 2006A
$11,800,000
02/01/08
02/01/27
4.37
FSA
11/21106
Virginia I City of
GO Hospital Improvement Bonds, Series 2006A
$4,145,000
02/01/10
02/01/16
3.87
XLCA
11/21/06
Lino Lakes I City of
GO Capital Improvement Plan Refunding Bonds, Series 2006E
$3,025,000
02/01/10
02/01/18
4.00
Aa3
11/21/06
Big Lake ISD No. 727
G.O. School Building Refunding Bands, Series 2006C
$4,910,000
02/01/08
02/01/13
3.80
Aa2
11/21/06
Luverne ISD No. 2184
G.O. School Building Refunding Bonds, Series 2006A
$8,620,000
02/01/08
02/01/18
3.83
XLCA
11/22106
Minnesota I State of
911 Revenue Bands (Public Safety Radio Comm. System) Series 2006
$35,000,000
06 /01 /08
06101/18
3.76
MBIA
11/27/06
Brandon I City of
G.O. Improvement Bonds, Series 2006A
$463,000
02/01/09
02/01/22
4.89
NR
11/28/06
Blue Eart h I City of
GO Swimming Pool Bonds, Series 2006D
$2,000,000
02/01/08
02/01/27
4.49
Baal
11128/06
Eden Prairie I ISD No. 272
G.O. School Building Refunding Bonds, Series 2006A
$5,860,000
02/01/08
02/01/13
3.63
Aa2
11/28/06
South Washington County ISD No. 833
G.O. School Building Bonds, Series 2006A
$110,000,000
02/01/08
021010
4.15
FSA
11/29/06
Shorewood I City of
GO Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2006A
$1,450,000
01/01/12
01/01/22
4.06
Aa3
11/29/06
Blaine a City of
GO Tax Increment Refunding Bonds, Series 2006A
$5,215,000
02/01/08
02/01/20
3.76
MBIA
11/29/06
Sauk Centre I ISD No. 743
G.O. School Building Refunding Bonds, Series 2006B
$2,975,000
02/01/08
02/01/14
3.65
AAA
11/29/06
Pequot Lakes ISO No. 186
G.O. School Building Refunding Bonds, Series 2006A
$8,385,000
02/01/13
02/01/22
3.92
MBIA
11/29/06
Montevideo . City of
G.O. Improvement Refunding Bonds, Series 20068
$1,630,000
02/01/10
02/01/21
4.12
Baal
12105/06
Hermantown Economic Development Authority
Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2006A
$9,630,000
02/01/07
02/01/27
4.04
XLCA
12/06/06
New London City of
GO Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds, Series 2006A
$2,420,000
02/01/09
02/01/26
4.26
RAA
12/06/06
Bloomington ISD No. 271
G.O. School Building Refunding Bonds, Series 2006C
$38,045,000
02/01/13
02101/24
4.23
FSA
12/06/06
Bloomington ISD No. 271
G.O. School Building Refunding Bonds, Series 2006C
$38,045,000
02/01/21
02/01/22
4.23
Aa2
12/06/06
Madison City of
G.O. Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2006A
$1,560,000
02/01/10
02/01/28
4.49
NR
12/06/06
Jackson City of
Electric Revenue Bonds, Series 2006A
$4,500,000
02/01/08
02/01/27
4.48
FAA
12/07/06
Little Falls I Economic Development Authority
Public Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2006C
$1,530,000
02/01/10
02/01/27
4.67
RAA
12/07/06
Milaca I City of
Lease - Purchase Agreement
$700,000
06/07/07
12/07/21
4.76
NR
12/07/06
Little Falls City of
GO Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds, Series 20068
$1,845,000
02/01/08
02/01/22
4.16
Baal
12/07/06
St. Cloud City of
GO Library Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 20068
$30,300,000
02/01/08
02101/19
3.89
FSA
12/07/06
St. Cloud City of
I
GO Infrastructure Management Fund Bonds, Series 2006A
$19,635,000
02/01/09
02/01/27
4.01
FSA
12/07/06
Woodbury I City of
GO Improvement Bonds, Series 2006C
$4,095,000
02/01/08
02/01/22
3.86
Aal
12/07/06
St. Cloud City of
GO Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 2006C
$550,000
12101/07
12/01/11
3.75
Aa3
12107/06
Montrose City of
G.O. Improvement Bands, Series 2006A
$3,015,000
02/01/08
02/01/27
4.40
NR
12/07/06
West Saint Paul I City of
G.O. Improvement Bands Series 2006A
$2,450,000
12/01/08
12/01/21
3.84
Aa3
12/07/06
Columbia Heights I City of
G.O. Improvement and Utility Revenue Bonds, Series 2006A
$4,075,000
02/01/08
02/01/20
3.80
CIFG
12/12/06
Burns I City of
GO Capital Improvement Plan Bonds, Series 2006A
$1,145,000
02101/08
02/01/17
3.91
NR
12/12/06
New Um ISD No. 088
GO Alternative Facility Bonds, Series 2006A
$835,000
02/01/08
02/01/17
3.80
AAA
12/12/06
Faribault City of
G.O. Equipment Certificates, Series 2006D
$525,000
08/01/07
08/01/11
3.61
At
12/12/06
Fa rib I City of
G.O. City Charter Bonds, Series 2006C
$1,075,000
02/01/08
02/01/22
4.01
At
12/13/06
Austin Port Authority
GO Economic Development Revenue Bonds, Series 2006A
$10,000,000
03/01/09
03/01/17
3.69
CIFG
12/13/06
Le Sueur County
GO Capital Improvement Plan Bands, Series 2006A
$2,555,000
02/01/09
02/01/23
3.97
FSA
12/13/06
Cedar Mountain I ISD No. 2754
G.O. School Building Refunding Bonds, Series 2006A
$1,925,000
02/01/08
02/01/19
3.82
AAA
'114/06
Hastings City of
GO Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2006B
$4,090,000
02101/08
02/01/27
4.02
AMBAC
14/06
North Branch � City of
GO Public Improvement Bonds, Series 2006C
$630,000
02/01/08
02/01/22
4.11
A2
J14/06
Hastings I City of
GO Improvement Bonds, Series 2006A
$1,975,000
02/01/09
02/01/18
3.85
CIFG
12/14/06
Detroit Lakes I City of
GO Impovement Bonds, Series 2006A
$4,830,000
02/01/08
02/01/27
3.95
CIFG
12/14/06
Hastings City of
GO Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 2006C
$395,000
02/01/09
02/01/12
3.81
Al
12/14/06
Traverse ounty
GO County Jail Bonds, Series 2006A
$2,515,000
02/01/13
02/01/27
4.02
CIFG
12/14/06
Elk River City of
G.O. Capital Improvement Bonds, Series 2006C
$3,220,000
02/01/08
02/01/27
4.04
XLCA
12/19/06
Andover conomic Development Authority
Pub Fac Lease Rev Ref Bonds, Series 2006 (City of Andover Comm Center)
$10,000,000
02101/15
02/01/34
4.36
AGC
12/19/06
New Germany I City of
G.O. Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2006A
$1,535,000
02101/09
02/01/28
4.39
NR
12/20/06
Delano I City of
GO Street Reconstruction Bonds, Series 2006A
$2,020,000
02/01/09
02/01/28
0.00
A3
12120 /06
Lakeville ISD No. 194
G.O. School Building Refunding Bands, Series 2006D
$72,415,000
02/01/22
02101/24
4.14
MBIA
12120/06
Lakeville ISD No. 194
G.O. School Building Refunding Bonds, Series 2006D
$72,415,000
02101/14
02/01/21
4.14
MBIA
12120106
Chisago ily I City of
G.O. Bonds, Series 2006A
$2,445,000
02101/08
02/01/23
4.08
A3
12121/06
Mankato City of
GO Tax Increment Bonds, Series 2006C
$1,215,000
02/01/09
02/01/17
5.27
Al
12/21/06
North Mankato I City of
GO Improvement Bonds, Series 2006C
$1,760,000
02/01/09
02/01/18
3.86
A2
12121/06
Brooklyn Center I City of
GO Improvement Bonds, Series 2006A
$1,460,000
02/01/08
02/01/17
3.78
Al
12/21/06
Mankato I City of
GO Improvement Bonds, Series 2006A
$9,945,000
02/01/08
02/01/17
0.00
MBIA
12/21/06
North Mankato I City of
GO Equip Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 2006D
$790,000
12/01/07
12/01/11
0.00
A2
12/21/06
Mankato City of
GO Capital Improvement Bonds, Series 20068
$665,000
02/01/08
02101/17
3.88
Al
12/21/06
Marshall City of
GO Alternative Facility Bonds, Series 2006A
$7,225,000
02/01/08
02/01/21
0.00
A2
12/21/06
Richfield Ct y of
G.O. Storm Sewer Bonds, Series 20068
$2,500,000
02101/08
02/01/27
4.07
Aa3
12121/06
Oakdale C ty of
G.O. Improvement Bonds, Series 2006A
$4,420,000
08/01/08
08/01127
3.87
FSA
12/21/06
Oakdale City of
G.O. Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 2006B
$605,000
02101/07
02/01/11
3.67
Aa3
12121/06
Atwater- osmos -Grove City ISD No. 2396
G.O. Capital Facilities Bonds, Series 2006C
$610,000
12101/07
12/01/16
3.79
AAA
12121/06
St. Peter I City of
Electric Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2006C
$1,620,000
02101/08
02/01/18
0.00
XLCA
12127/06
Watertown -Mayer I ISD No. 111
G.O. School Building Bonds, Series 2006A
$10,000,000
02/01/10
02/01/22
3.83
MBIA
12128/06
Mound Housing and Redevelopment Authority
Limited Tax Pledge Bonds (Mound Transit Center)
$2,965,000
02/01/08
08/01/36
4.69
Al
12/28/06
Winona City of
GO Water Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 20068
$2,340,000
02/01/09
02/01/15
3.63
Aa2
12/28/06
Moorhead City of
GO Improvement Bonds, Series 2006C
$12,625,000
02/01/09
02/01/28
4.07
XLCA
12/28/06
Brainerd I City of
GO Improvement Bonds, Series 2006A
$1,630,000
02/01/08
02/01/17
3.77
CIFG
12/28/06
Chaska City of
GO Equipment Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 20068
$955,000
12/01/08
12/01/13
3.68
A
12/28/06
Carlton County
GO Capital Improvement Bonds, Series 2006
$3,000,000
02/01/07
02/01/21
3.99
FSA
12/28/06
Chaska I City of
GO Bonds, Series 2006A
$8,595,000
12/01107
12/01/27
3.91
CIFG
12128/06
Waubun -Ogema -White Earth I ISD No. 435
G.O. School Building Refunding Bonds, Series 2006A
$8,265,000
02/01/13
02/01/28
3.96
FSA
12128/06
Barnesville I City of
G.O. Bonds, Series 2006A
$880,000
02/01/08
02/01122
4.17
NR
12/28/06
Mora I City of
G.O. Bonds, Series 2006A
$1,835,000
02101/08
02/01/27
4.10
AMBAC
12/28/06
Lexington I City of
Lease - Purchase Agreement
$660,000
06/28/07
12/28/21
4.77
NR
12/28/06
Osseo Area Schools I ISD No. 279
G.O. Alternative Facilities Bonds, Series 2006A
$5,235,000
02/01/09
02/01/17
3.66
Aa2
01/03/07
Prior Lake- Savage Area Schools ISD No. 719
G.O. School Building Refunding Bonds, Series 2007B
$29,375,000
02/01/11
02/01/21
3.94
MBIA
01/03/07
Prior Lake - Savage Area Schools ISD No. 719
I
G.O. School Building Bonds, Series 2007A
$12,160,000
02/01/08
02101/26
4.24
FSA
01/03/07
Watertown -Mayer I ISD No. 111
G.O. School Building Bonds, Series 2007A
$8,385,000
02101/19
02/01/26
3.99
FSA
01/04/07
Capitol Region Watershed District
Watershed District Tax Supported Bands, Series 2007A
$1,555,000
02/01/08
02/01/27
4.04
Aa3
X1/04/07
Hermantown I City of
G.O. Utility Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2007A
$1,565,000
02/01/11
02/01/21
3.90
A2
'94/07
Pequot Lakes ISD No. 186
G.O. School Building Refunding Bonds, Series 2007A
$8,355,000
02101/13
02101/22
3.94
MBIA
04/07
Sauk Rapids ice I ISD No. 47
G.O. Aid Anticipation Certificates of Indebtedness, Series 2007A
$2,000,000
09/28/07
09/28/07
3.64
NR
1/05/07
Andover Economic Development Authority
Public Fac Lease Rev Ref Bonds, Series 2007 (City of Andover Comm Center)
$6,865,000
02/01/15
02/01/34
4.36
AGC
01/09/07
Grand Marais I City of
G.O. Temporary Improvement Bands, Series 2007A
$1,630,000
01/09/10
01/09/10
3.83
NR
01/16/07
Anoka Regional Railroad Authority
Limited Tax Bonds, Series 2007A
$32,510,000
02/01/08
02/01132
4.46
XLCA
01/23/07
Cass Lake -Bens I ISD No. 115
G.O. School Building Refunding Bonds, Series 2007A
$16,315,000
02/01/14
02101/28
4.35
MBIA
01/24/07
South St. Paul City of
G.O. Refunding Bonds, Series 20078
$1,840,000
02/01/09
02/01/21
3.99
Al
01/24/07
South St. Paul City of
G.O. Improvement Bonds, Series 2007A
$1,420,000
02/01/08
02/01/17
3.86
Al
-5-
Ehlers Advisor • February 2007
State Of Minnesota Sells $35 Million in Revenue Bonds
To Fund Next Phase of Statewide Public Safety Radio System
By Mark Ruff, Ehlers Financial Advisor, CIPFA
The State of Minnesota is implementing
Phase 3 of its statewide public safety
communications systems, funded
through a $35 million 911 Revenue Bond
issued in November 2006.
The funding will provide for the
expansion of the current metro area
system into 23 counties in the central
Minnesota State Patrol district (St. Cloud)
and in its southeast district (Rochester).
A chief purpose of the system, dubbed
ARMER ( "Minnesota's Allied Radio
Matrix for Emergency Response ") is to
provide one seamless communications
system useable by all state, regional and
local public safety response agencies in
the State of Minnesota.
The system enables agencies to speak to
one another and coordinate incident
response.
The system also has many other benefits
including expanded capacity to
accommodate growing radio system
demand in Minnesota and a quality
system allowing agencies to switch to
their own channel when they do not
need to coordinate with other agencies.
The need to use technology to create a
common communications system was
originally identified in the 1990s when
Minneapolis police and Minnesota State
Troopers who were in Minneapolis were
unable to communicate with one
another because one agency used a UHF
radio system and the other a VHF radio
system, according to Minnesota
Department of Transportation officials.
In 1995, the Legislature passed
legislation to plan for a metro-wide
communications system.
In 2001, the September 11 th attack
underscored the need for emergency
responders in every metropolitan area
and every state to have a commun-
ications system in which all agencies
could all communicate with one another
to coordinate emergency response.
In 2002, the Minnesota Legislature
directed the Minnesota Department of
Public Safety, the Minnesota Department
of Transportation, the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources, the
Minnesota Department of
Administration, and other parties to
cooperatively develop a plan to design
and implement an 800 MHz digital radio
system throughout Minnesota.
The Statewide Radio Board was created
by the Minnesota Legislature in 2004 to
implement the Statewide Interoperable
Public Safety Radio and Communication
System Plan. The statewide plan evolved
out of the regionwide interoperable
radio system in the Minneapolis /St. Paul
metropolitan area in 2001.
ARMER uses the latest and most
advanced technology to provide
interactive communication capabilities
that are not available with older radio
systems. It will require three additional
phases in the southwest and northern
parts of the state to complete the
statewide system.
Debt service on the 911 Revenue Bonds
will be paid with the 911 fee assessed to
all telephone lines in the State, currently
at $.65 /month.
Despite debt service coverage over 700
percent, there was a wide disparity in
the rating agencies' views of the security
of the 911 Revenue Bonds for the
underlying rating. S&P rated the bonds
AA +, Fitch at AA -, and Moody's at A2.
Reasons for Moody's more pessimistic
view of the bonds were concerns over
the potential for technological change
which may affect the 911 fee revenues.
The State has been successful in
collecting 911 fees from all major phone
companies, including the voice over
internet protocol firms such as Vonage
and the cable companies.
Ehlers served as financial advisor to the
State Department of Finance for the sale
of the Bonds. Kennedy & Graven was
bond counsel. The State purchased bond
insurance from MBIA Insurance
Corporation for AAA/AAA/Aaa rated
bonds, received nine bids through a
competitive sale, and achieved a 3.764
percent true interest rate with no debt
service reserve on the revenue bonds.
Northstar Corridor Commuter
Rail Project Moves Forward
Minnesota's first commuter rail project
has taken another step forward with
Anoka County Regional Railroad
Authority's ( ACRRA) sale of $32,510,000
Limited Tax Bonds for a substantial
portion of ACRRA and Sherburne County
Regional Railroad Authority's project
funding.
The 40-mile Northstar Commuter Rail
runs from downtown Minneapolis to
Minnesota's Big Lake area, parallel to
Trunk Highways 47 and 10, one of the
fastest growing areas in the state.
Northstar is scheduled to be operational
in 2009, with the capacity to carry
the equivalent of nearly one and
one -half lanes of highway traffic at
peak travel times.
Northstar Commuter Rail will have six
stations and will have the capacity to
carry more than 7,000 riders per day. It
will use existing railroad tracks owned
by BNSF Railway (formerly the
Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad).
The stations will be located in Big Lake,
-4-
Elk River, Anoka, Coon Rapids, Fridley
and Minneapolis.
The bond proceeds from the Anoka
County Regional Railroad Authority were
needed to make a first payment in early
2007 to BNSF
Railway for The rail line will have
easement rights inter -modal connections
on the existing to hits transit and to the
railroad. Hiawatha Light Rail
ACRRA will be Transit (LRT) line which
responsible for runs from downtown
81 percent of Minneapolis to
the annual debt the Mall of America.
service and
Sherburne County Railroad Authority
will pay 19 percent of debt service
through their respective railroad
authority property tax levies over the
next 25 years.
"Selling one set of bonds for both county
rail authorities demonstrates the inter-
governmental cooperation necessary to
COMMUTER RAIL (continued on page 6)
Ehlers Advisor • February 2007
gulf
City of Cannon Falls Finances Major 2006 Improvement Projects
Without a Property Tax Levy
The City of Cannon Falls was able to finance and complete
two major street, water and sewer improvement projects in
2006 without any increase in the property tax levy.
"We have provided water, sewer and street improvements to
an annexed neighborhood, and are making street
improvements in an area with deteriorating road conditions
at no property tax cost to our taxpayers," said City
Councilmember Lisa Wilcox- Erhardt.
But at first, the financial picture was not as rosy, according to
City Administrator Kathleen Miller.
"When we first looked at the numbers, it looked like we would
need an annual property tax levy of about $300,000 for 15
years to complete the improvements and pay the City's share,"
said Miller.
"But our financing solution has allowed us to not only not levy
taxes for the improvements in 2007, but it appears the City
will not need to levy anything for the duration of the 15 -year
bond issued for the projects," said Miller.
'he Cedar Hills Neighborhood was recently annexed into
annon Falls, and the 51 homes were served by private wells
and septic systems. The Cedar Hills project includes street
construction and reconstruction and the extension of City
water and sewer trunk lines to the neighborhood.
The 2nd Street Area project includes street reconstruction and
replacement of water and sewer trunk lines. The
improvements were needed to address deteriorating road
conditions.
In Spring 2006, the City Council received construction bids for
both the Cedar Hills and 2nd Street Area projects. After bids
were received and total costs determined, the City began to
work with its financial advisor, Ehlers & Associates, to
determine total project costs and how they would be paid.
When Ehlers determined it would take a tax levy of about
$300,000 for 15 years to pay for the bond issue, the City Council
directed staff and Ehlers to look at other financing options.
"It was important to us that this project was affordable for all
residents. We really wanted to minimize the property tax levy,"
said City Councilmember Wilcox- Erhardt. "We weren't afraid
to look at creative solutions; in fact we wanted to look at all
the options to achieve affordability."
Funding Options
Ehlers completed a rate study and found that Water and Sewer
Reserve Funds could contribute almost $800,000 towards the
water and sewer components of the projects. These
contributions lowered the projected property tax levy to about
$200,000 per year for 15 years.
City staff and Ehlers also began a review of all of the City's
existing tax increment financing (TIT) districts. As a result of
this review, tax increments from older TIF districts were able
to pay for eligible components of the projects. The TIF, along
with special assessments, will be used to assist in paying debt
obligations for the Cedar Hills and 2nd Street Area
Improvements, eliminating future tax levies for this project.
"Cannon Falls is to be commended. They refused to just accept
the obvious choice in front of them - raise property taxes and
complete the project, or do nothing. They wanted more
information," said Dave Callister, Ehlers Financial Advisor. "We
worked with them to examine all the options, and they found
they could complete the project and not raise property taxes."
"Cities that take the time to examine all the options are often
surprised by the alternatives they actually have," Callister said.
The City Council recognized the financial hardship caused by
the special assessments, connection fees and private water
hookups borne by the Cedar Hills residents and cut the original
assessment amount in half. The City also agreed to assist the
property owners by allowing them to finance the connection
fees over the same 15 -year period of the assessments.
The 2nd Street Area project construction is completed, and the
Cedar Hills project will be completed in Spring 2007. The City
is pleased with the outcome.
"We accomplished important projects. As a result of the
financing methods we were able to use, we did not raise
property taxes," said Councilmember Wilcox- Erhardt. "It's not
very often an elected official can say that."
MINNESOTA CITY COUNTY MANAGERS ASSOCIATION ...... ...............................
Feb 23 -24, Edgewater Resort, Duluth, MN
MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION ............ ... .I.....................:.....
March 6 -8, St. Cloud Civic Center, St. Cloud, MN
MINNESOTA CLERK'S & FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION ............ .........
:.............. March 6 -9, Arrowwood, Alexandria, MN
-MINNESOTA ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS. . -: :... ..:::.
:::.: :.:.- March -15 -16; Sheraton-Inn, Bloomington, MN"
LMC / AMC / MSBA LEGISLATIVE CONFERENCE .......... ...............................
March 28 -29, Crowne Plaza, Saint Paul, MN
MINNESOTA ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL BUSINESS OFFICIALS ...................................
'MINNESOTA
May 2 -4, Breezy Point, Brainerd, MN
MAYOR'S CONFERENCE .........................'...........
...:..... :.........:.........:. _ May 4 -5, Willmar, MN
MINNESOTA CITY COUNTY MANAGERS ASSOCIATION ........:... ...............................
May 9 -11, Cragun's, Brainerd, MN
MINNESOTA NATIONAL ASSOC OF HOUSING REDEVELOPMENT OFFICIALS
.........................May 23 -25, Madden's, Brainerd, MN
• 3
Commuter Rail (continued from page 4)
make a project like this happen. And it is
efficient, saving on costs of issuance and
interest costs," commented Terry
Johnson, former finance director and now
County Administrator at Anoka County.
The estimated project capital costs are
$307 million. Funding sources for the
capital costs are 50 percent federal,
33 percent state, and 17 percent local
(Anoka County Regional Railroad
Authority, Sherburne County Regional
Railroad Authority and Hennepin County
Regional Railroad Authority). Hennepin
County Regional Railroad Authority will
pay cash for its entire share of the
project costs.
"The bond sale is an important step in
this multi - jurisdictional project," said
Anoka County Commissioner Dan Erhart,
chair of the Anoka County Regional Rail
Authority and the Northstar Corridor
Development Authority. "The counties
needed to make these payments to assure
service on the line by the end of 2009."
The Northstar Corridor Development
Authorities' four participating counties of
Anoka, Sherburne, Benton, and
Hennepin counties have been planning
for this project for almost 10 years.
Additional partners in the project are the
Metropolitan Council and the Minnesota
Department of Transportation.
The rail line will have inter -modal
connections to bus transit and to the
Hiawatha light Rail Transit (IRT) line
which runs from downtown Minneapolis
to the Mall of America. When a rider
transfers from Northstar Commuter Rail
to Hiawatha LRT or a bus, an additional
ticket purchase is not required, thereby
allowing for easy movement between
systems.
The Northstar Commuter Rail Project
includes a four -block LRT extension on
the northwest end of the Hiawatha LRT
to reach the downtown Minneapolis
commuter rail station. With the
exception of the downtown Minneapolis
station, all of the stations will have park -
and -ride facilities.
The first phase of the Northstar rail
construction began in early August 2006,
in downtown Minneapolis with utility
relocation work. The Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) granted Final
Ehlers Advisor • February 2007
By Brian Reilly, Ehlers Financial Advisor, CIPFA, CFA
Interest rate markets remained range -bound during the fourth quarter of 2006, showing no
discernable trend, other than heightened levels of volatility. Market participants wrestled over the
outlook for inflation, economic growth and Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) action /inaction
on overnight rates. Bond Buyer Index, 1990 to Present —JAN. 26, 2007
Traders have opened on the 0.000
4.32% on
1/26/07
4.03% on
January, as witnessed by a 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 lowest
roughly twenty basis point move NOTE: The Bond Buyer 20 Bond Index is a weekly index of average interest rates on since 6/67
(.20 %) in the ten -year treasury AA -rated municipal bonds maturing in 20 years. Source: The Bond Buyer.
yield from just under 4.70 percent on January 2nd to 4.90 percent on January 29th. This change in
sentiment was seemingly brought about by a string of better - than - expected economic releases and
indications that the FOMC was no longer leaning in the direction of cuts in the Fed Funds rate.
Observers wait with baited breath to glean even the slightest intuition on the future direction of
FOMC action, following each meeting statement and the release of minutes. Economic reports have
the ability to move the market ten to fifteen basis points in a single day, only to see yields return to
previous levels a few days later. A large move in rates in either direction seems to be just a data
point away. Many are looking for the straw that broke the consumer's back, while others feel we are
in the "Goldilocks" environment.
No matter what the outcome, one thing remains certain for municipal issuers: ten -year interest
rates at 3.99 percent and twenty -year interest rates at roughly 4.25 percent ( "AAA" insured scale as
reported by MMD the week of Jan. 29) are awfully hard to frown upon. These rates are certainly up
from their lows in December (the Bond Buyer 20 Index° reached a 35 year low on December 11), but
remain attractive, nonetheless.
Advance refundings continue to be a large portion of the issuance calendar, as a near "perfect
storm" (low refunding bond rates and ability to invest in refunding escrows with little or no loss) has
developed on that front, although the recent move up in yields has made timing sales more difficult.
We continue to monitor refunding opportunities for clients, as well as recommend locking in to
long -term maturity structures as soon as feasible.
Design status to the project in
September 2006.
The Minnesota Legislature in its 2005
bonding legislation allocated $37.5
million for Northstar, while the 2006
bonding legislation authorized the
remaining $60 million State contribution
for the project. The State funds currently
cannot be released until the final grant
agreement is signed by the FTA,
expected in the summer of 2007.
The Bonds are rated Aa2 by Moody's and
were insured by XL Capital Assurance to
an Aaa level. The winning bidder on the
bonds was an underwriting group
including Piper Jaffray and Wells Fargo.
Ehlers & Associates was the financial
advisor, and Faegre & Benson was
the bond counsel.
"Explaining the nature of the limited tax
bonds to the rating agency and bond
insurance companies required a fair
amount of time," said Mark Ruff,
financial advisor to ACRRA. "These types
of bonds are rare in Minnesota." In
addition, the bonds contained a special
call provision in 2008 upon the small
chance that the Federal Transit
Administration does not sign the grant
agreement on a timely basis.
"The planning and years of hard work
put in by the counties, Met Council, and
State will make this important project a
reality in the next three years," Ruff said
E H L E R S Ehlers & Associates is committed to Roseville, MN Office: 3060 Centre Pointe Drive • Roseville, MN 55113 - 1105.651- 697 -8500
designing outstanding financial solutions Brookfield, WI Office: 375 Bishops Way, Suite 225 • Brookfield, WI 53005 - 6202.262- 785 -1520
a A s s o c i A r E s N c for outstanding communities Lisle, IL Office: 550 Warrenville Road, Suite 220 • Lisle, IL 60532 - 4311.630- 271 -3330
www.ehiers- ine.com
•6•
ro
meaning of a (treasury) yield
7.50%
curve that has remained inverted
7.00%
longer than many thought
possible: Does it foretell
6.50
recession? Are Fed Funds rate
s.00%
cuts imminent? Is it really
5.50%
"different" this time? The market
5.00%
seemed to experience a shift in
4.50%
psychology through the end of
4.00%
4.32% on
1/26/07
4.03% on
January, as witnessed by a 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 lowest
roughly twenty basis point move NOTE: The Bond Buyer 20 Bond Index is a weekly index of average interest rates on since 6/67
(.20 %) in the ten -year treasury AA -rated municipal bonds maturing in 20 years. Source: The Bond Buyer.
yield from just under 4.70 percent on January 2nd to 4.90 percent on January 29th. This change in
sentiment was seemingly brought about by a string of better - than - expected economic releases and
indications that the FOMC was no longer leaning in the direction of cuts in the Fed Funds rate.
Observers wait with baited breath to glean even the slightest intuition on the future direction of
FOMC action, following each meeting statement and the release of minutes. Economic reports have
the ability to move the market ten to fifteen basis points in a single day, only to see yields return to
previous levels a few days later. A large move in rates in either direction seems to be just a data
point away. Many are looking for the straw that broke the consumer's back, while others feel we are
in the "Goldilocks" environment.
No matter what the outcome, one thing remains certain for municipal issuers: ten -year interest
rates at 3.99 percent and twenty -year interest rates at roughly 4.25 percent ( "AAA" insured scale as
reported by MMD the week of Jan. 29) are awfully hard to frown upon. These rates are certainly up
from their lows in December (the Bond Buyer 20 Index° reached a 35 year low on December 11), but
remain attractive, nonetheless.
Advance refundings continue to be a large portion of the issuance calendar, as a near "perfect
storm" (low refunding bond rates and ability to invest in refunding escrows with little or no loss) has
developed on that front, although the recent move up in yields has made timing sales more difficult.
We continue to monitor refunding opportunities for clients, as well as recommend locking in to
long -term maturity structures as soon as feasible.
Design status to the project in
September 2006.
The Minnesota Legislature in its 2005
bonding legislation allocated $37.5
million for Northstar, while the 2006
bonding legislation authorized the
remaining $60 million State contribution
for the project. The State funds currently
cannot be released until the final grant
agreement is signed by the FTA,
expected in the summer of 2007.
The Bonds are rated Aa2 by Moody's and
were insured by XL Capital Assurance to
an Aaa level. The winning bidder on the
bonds was an underwriting group
including Piper Jaffray and Wells Fargo.
Ehlers & Associates was the financial
advisor, and Faegre & Benson was
the bond counsel.
"Explaining the nature of the limited tax
bonds to the rating agency and bond
insurance companies required a fair
amount of time," said Mark Ruff,
financial advisor to ACRRA. "These types
of bonds are rare in Minnesota." In
addition, the bonds contained a special
call provision in 2008 upon the small
chance that the Federal Transit
Administration does not sign the grant
agreement on a timely basis.
"The planning and years of hard work
put in by the counties, Met Council, and
State will make this important project a
reality in the next three years," Ruff said
E H L E R S Ehlers & Associates is committed to Roseville, MN Office: 3060 Centre Pointe Drive • Roseville, MN 55113 - 1105.651- 697 -8500
designing outstanding financial solutions Brookfield, WI Office: 375 Bishops Way, Suite 225 • Brookfield, WI 53005 - 6202.262- 785 -1520
a A s s o c i A r E s N c for outstanding communities Lisle, IL Office: 550 Warrenville Road, Suite 220 • Lisle, IL 60532 - 4311.630- 271 -3330
www.ehiers- ine.com
•6•
Gabbert & Beck
3510 GALLERIA, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55435 -4269
(952) 925 -4321 Fax (952) 925 -2965
February 15, 2007
Wayne Houle
City Engineer
City of Edina
4801 West 50m Street
Edina, MN 55424
RE: West 7e Street Improvements
Dear Wayne:
Thank you for meeting to discuss the proposed design and costs associated with the
proposed project. We have reviewed the design and believe it presents a viable solution
to the traffic and access needs for the properties along the street.
While we support the design concept, and generally acknowledge the proposed
assessment proposal, we reserve our right to further comment on the specifics of the
assessment at the appropriate time in the process.
As we mentioned, we further appreciate the opportunity to provide more specific design
comments by our engineer at the appropriate time. As we mentioned, the construction
timing for the project is also critical with respect to the retail seasons and the specific
construction schedules on the Galleria site. It is important to commence the construction
as early in the summer as is reasonably possible.
Si cerely,
` Warren Beck
CC: Eric Anderson
Vern Swing
Peter Beck
F
V Darlene Wallin
-0m: Jennifer Bennerotte
nt: Sunday, February 18, 2007 2:30 PM
o: Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Joni Bennett; Linda Masica; scot.housh @wilIis.com
Cc: Darlene Wallin
Subject: FW: Attention Ann Swenson
Attachments: IMG_2933.JPG; ATT1 115091 1.txt; ATT1 11 50912.txt
IMG_2933.JPG (1 ATT11150911.b(t ATT11150912.bd
MB) (82 B) (155 B)
- - - -- Original Message---- -
From: Kitty O'Dea (mailto:kittyodea @comcast.net]
Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2007 9:03 AM
To: Jennifer Bennerotte
Subject: Attention Ann Swenson
Jennifer, please forward to Ann. Thanks Kitty
Ann,
We were so appreciative that you put all the issues together and overturned the changes to
the south facade at 4608 Bruce. Thought you would be interested in the latest.
TMS went ahead and put'in a door even though the railing wasn't approved. Per Steve
rchman, City ordinance requires a railing or that the door only open 4 inches. The
riginal COA showed a window and not a door. If I understand Steve's note, he will
approve a railing even though Council didn't
JMS should have installed a window (original COA) when the railing wasn't approved
(amended COA) since the railing was there only because a door was proposed. While the
door wasn't explicitly rejected, it implicitly was rejected.
Right after the Council meeting, JMS tried to get on the HPB agenda to present another
plan. They were too late and were told to wait a month. They didn't submit anything.
Seems like they found an easier way to get what they wanted. The same thing happened on
the steel wall and the elm tree. Very discouraging.
Kitty
***************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
***************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Kitty:
The Building code would require the door open no more than 4" if a railing isn't
installed.
Steve A. Kirchman
Chief Building Official
952 826 0450
skirchman @ci.edina.mn.us
***************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
***************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * **
Begin forwarded message:
From: Kitty O'Dea <kittyodea @comcast.net>
• Date: February 13, 2007 5:54:01 PM CST
• To: kirchman Steve <skirchman @ci.edina.mn.us >, Joyce Repya
• <JRepya @ci.edina.mn.us>
• Cc: Jim Hovland < j hovlandArauseroll ins. com>, Cary Teague
• <cteague@ci.edina.mn.us>
• Subject: 4608 french door versus window
> Steve and Joyce -
• The City Council did not approve the juliet balcony at 4608 Bruce. I
• am curious then why doors were installed with a door knob on the
• exterior rather than the windows as depicted on the original COA.
>
> Please advise.
> Kitty O'Dea
7
M
WFAN
i► ,
v :
s
ti
^� =tY