Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-05-15_COUNCIL MEETINGEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING PROCEDURES During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public comment after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to speak on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your comments are relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: • Individuals must limit their presentations to three minutes. The Mayor will modify presentation times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit comments to the matter under consideration. • In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. During "Public Comments," the Mayor will ask to hear from those in attendance who would like to speak about something not on the agenda. Individuals must limit their presentations to three minutes and cannot speak to an issue for which a public hearing was previously held and closed or a matter scheduled for a future hearing. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments. Instead, the Council might direct the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL MAY 15, 2007 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of May 1, 2007 * II. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre List dated May 10, 2007, TOTAL $9,479.90. III. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL EMS WEEK PROCLAIMED - May 20th -26th, 2007 Agenda /Edina City Council May 15, 2007 Page 2 * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of May 1, 2007 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Zoning Ordinances: First Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three Council members except that a rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Second Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three of Council to pass except rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall votes of four members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required passing. Conditional Use Permit: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required to pass. Variance Appeal: Favorable rollcall of Council Members present to uphold or deny appeal. A. Resolution No. 2007 -60 - Adding Edina Heritage Landmark Zoning Designation to the Browndale Bridge B. Resolution No. 2007 -61 - Adding Edina Heritage Landmark Zoning Designation to the Edina Mill Site III. ORDINANCES - First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass. A. Second Reading Ordinance No. 2007 -07 - An Ordinance Amending Subsection 1115.02 of the City Code Regarding An Irrigation Ban B. Public Hearing - Ordinance No. 2007 -08 - An Ordinance Amending Section 850 of the City Code Regarding Setbacks and Building Height C. First Reading - Ordinance No. 2007 -10 - An Ordinance Amending Section 1040 of the City Code Regarding Construction Noise IV. PUBLIC COMMENT V. AWARD OF BID A. Todd Park Neighborhood Reconstruction: Contract No. ENG 07 -7, Improvement Nos. BA -340, SS -433, WM -464 and STS -335 Agenda/ Edina City Council May 15, 2007 Page 3 VI. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS A. Report by Board of Appeal & Equalization - John Helling B. Resolution No. 2007 -57 Accepting Various Donations C. Bike Edina Task Force Appointment * D. Resolution No. 2007 -59 Promoting Use of Intrastate Mutual Aid Agreements * E. Traffic Safety Report F. Gymnasium Construction Change Order VII. FINANCE * A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated May 3, 2007, TOTAL $759,399.19; and May 10, 2007, TOTAL $1,006,379.69. VIII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS IX. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS X. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927 - 886172 hours in advance of the meeting. Tues May 22 Mon May 28 Tues Jun 5 Tues Jun 19 Tues Jun 26 Tues Jul3 Wed Jul4 Tues Jul 17 Tues Jul 24 rues Aug 7 Tues Aug 21 Tues Aug 28 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS Study Session - To be determined 11:30 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM MEMORIAL DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Study Session - To be determined 11:30 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS INDEPENDENCE DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Study Session - To be determined 11:30 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Study Session - To be determined 11:30 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM h I ,' 111-1 &I OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MAY 1, 2007 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Masica, Swenson and Chair Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Bennett and seconded by Commissioner Swenson approving the Consent Agenda for the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR APRIL 17, 2007, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Bennett and seconded by Commissioner Swenson approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority for April 17, 2007. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director R65CKREG LOG20000 CRY OF EDINA 619/2007 14:68:21 Council Check Reglater page - 1 6/10/2007 — 611012007 Check 9 Data Amount Supplier I Explanation PO 0 Doc No Im No Aocount No Subledger Account Dasrxfp0on Business Unit 13962 SM012007 100000 URS CORPORATION 9,479.90 PROMENADE PLAN 160436 2790336 9132.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAID: TAX DISTRICT . 9,479.90 9,479.90 .Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Tote) 9,479.90 Total Payments 9,479.90 R65CKSUM LOG20, CRY OF EDO W9200'i 1:24 Councl Check Summery Pepe - 1 51102007 - 5110/2007 Company Amount 09000 HRA FUND 9,479.90 Report Totals 9,479.90 We. confirm to the best of our lanoM&499 and belief, that these claims comply in all material men � h require Y of EdM P� o n ow e V •'�conPOAAT�O/ 1888 PROCLAMATION EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES WEEK WHEREAS, emergency medical services is a vital public service; and WHEREAS, emergency medical services teams of the Edina Fire and Police Departments are ready to provide lifesaving care to those in need 24 hours a day, seven days a week; and WHEREAS, access to quality emergency care dramatically improves the survival rate and recovery rate of those who experience sudden illness or injury; and WHEREAS, the emergency medical services system consists of emergency physicians, emergency nurses, emergency medical technicians, paramedics, firefighters, educators, administrators, and others; and WHEREAS, emergency medical services providers have traditionally served as the safety net of America's health care system; and WHEREAS, emergency medical services responders of the Edina Fire and Police Departments engage in thousands of hours of specialized training and continuing education to enhance their lifesaving skills; and WHEREAS, the citizens of the City of Edina benefit daily from the knowledge and skills of these highly trained individuals; and WHEREAS, injury prevention and the appropriate use of the Emergency Medical Services System will help reduce health care cost; and WHEREAS, it is appropriate to recognize the value and the accomplishments of the Edina Police and Edina Fire emergency medical personnel who serve to protect us. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I, James B. Hovland, Mayor of the City of Edina, do hereby acknowledge the week of May 20 - 26, 2007 as "Emergency Medical Services Week" in the City of Edina in honor and recognition of the valuable contributions made by the Edina Emergency Medical Service Providers to the health and well -being of our citizens. DATED this 15th day of May, 2007. James B. Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MAY 1, 2007 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Member Housh was absent. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by. Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented with the exception of Agenda Item No. II. A. 3. & 4. Set Hearing Date (05/15/07) Ord. No. 2007 -9-09 Amending Subsection 850.14, Subd. 5 and Final Development Plan, Cypress Equities, Old AMC Theater Site. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. MAY 2007 PROCLAIMED HERITAGE PRESERVATION MONTH Mayor Hovland proclaimed the month of May as Heritage Preservation Month in the City of Edina and encouraged residents to recognize and participate in fostering local pride and maintaining community character in our. City. Member Masica made a motion seconded by Member Swenson proclaiming May 2007 as Heritage Preservation Month in Edina. Ayes: Bennett, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. 2007 HERITAGE AWARD PRESENTED Associate Planner Repya along with the Mayor and City Council presented the 2007 Edina Heritage Award to Dick and Jackie Whitbeck owners of the Sly House located at 6128 Brookview. Avenue. Ms. Repya briefly reviewed the renovation project undertaken by the Whitbecks and how they preserved their historic farm home. MAY 20-26,2007, NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK PROCLAIMED Mayor Hovland encouraged all citizens.and civic organizations to recognize the contributions public works officials make every day to our health, safety, comfort and quality of life. Member Masica made a motion proclaiming May 20 - 26, 2007, as National Public Works Week in Edina. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. 2006 STATE CHAMPION GIRLS TENNIS TEAM COMMENDED Mayor Hovland congratulated the 2006 Edina Girls Tennis Team on their winning season and State Championship. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Masica adopting Resolution No. 2007 -58 commending the 2006 Edina Girls Tennis Team on their 2006 Classic Lake Conference, Section and State Championships, as a team and as Doubles Champions. Ayes: Bennett, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 17, 2007, WORK SESSION OF APRIL 17, 2007, AND STUDY SESSION OF APRIL 24, 2007, APPROVED Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson approving as presented the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of April 17, 2007, Work Session of April 17, 2007, and Study Session of April 24, 2007. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. Page 1 Minutes/Edina City Council/April 17,200 *HEARING DATE SET OF MAY 15, 2007, FOR PLANNING MATTERS Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson setting May 15, 2007, .as hearing date for planning matters: 1. Designation to Edina Heritage Landmark District pursuant to Section 850.20 of the City Code 2. Ordinance No. 2007 -08 Subsection 850.03, Subdivision 3 Building Height or Structure Height, Subsection 850.07 Subdivision 6 Exceptions to Setback Requirements, and Subsection 850.11 Subdivision 6b Minimum Setbacks Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. Member Bennett made a motion seconded by Member Masica setting June 5, 2007, as hearing date for the following planning matters: 1. Ordinance No. 2007 -09 Subsection 850.14, Subdivision 5, an amendment regarding non- residential floor area in the MDD -6 District. 2. Final Development Plan, Cypress Equities - Old AMC Theater Site Ayes: Bennett, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ADOPTED RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -51 AUTHORIZING AGREEMENT ASSIGNING CDBG SCATTERED SITE AFFORDABLE HOUSING FUND TO WEST HENNEPIN AFFORDABLE HOUSING LAND TRUST Associate Planner Repya explained the CDBG Scattered Site Affordable Housing Program had a balance of $245,481 that must be spent by December 31, 2007, or the funds will be recaptured by Hennepin County to be redistributed County -wide. She noted the funds represented the accumulated program budgets for years 2004 through 2006. The Council briefly discussed the proposal with Janet Lindbo, Executive Director of West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust, and Ms. Repya. Member Masica made a motion adopting Resolution No. 2007 -51 authorizing agreement assigning CDBG Scattered Site Affordable Housing Fund to West Hennepin Affordable Housing Land Trust. Member Swenson seconded the motion.. Ayes: Bennett, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENT - No one appeared to comment. ORDINANCE NO. 2007 -07 AMENDING SUBSECTION 1115.02 IRRIGATION BAN GRANTED FIRST READING Engineer Houle reviewed the proposed changes to Edina Code Subsection 1115.02 outlining the reasons for the changes. He explained that daytime sprinkling has prevented the City's water system from recovering from daytime water usage. Mr. Houle said he felt the amendment was necessary in order to maintain adequate water supply for all uses including firefighting, to balance peak day water use, and to promote water conservation. The Council discussed the proposed amendment noting that golf courses, homes with private wells and those getting water from the City of Minneapolis would .not be affected by the amendment; the method of notifying residents of the change; permits allowing watering of new sod and seed areas; and proposed surcharges. Member Swenson made a motion to grant First Reading to Ordinance No. 2007 -07 amending Subsection 1115.02 Irrigation Ban directing staff to revise: subparagraph 1 and subparagraph 3 of Subd. 5 Exempt Properties, and adding language about proposed surcharges before presenting for Second Reading. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 2 Minutes/Edina City Council/February 21, 2006 *BID AWARDED FOR ONE TON TRUCK - 3500 SERIES 4WD CAB /CHASSIS Motion made by ' Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson awarding the bid for one ton truck - 3500 series 4WD cab /chassis to recommended low bidder, Thane Hawkins Polar Chevrolet (State Contract No. 436979) in the amount of $21,371.38. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR PORTABLE TRAILER MOUNTED ARROWBOARD Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson awarding the bid for one Portable Trailer Mounted Arrowboard to recommended low bidder, United Rentals Highway Technologies (State Contract No. 437321) at $19,003.86 Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes.. REPORT PRESENTED ON CONSTRUCTION NOISE Sanitarian Engelman presented the findings of her survey of surrounding communities regarding the requirements/ limitations on construction noise. She contacted St. Louis Park, Minnetonka, Eden Prairie, Bloomington, Hopkins, Richfield; and Golden Valley and reported to Council the restrictions if any applied to construction noise. Ms. Engelman also outlined that Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Noise Standards. Foll owing a discussion of the existing standards, those of surrounding communities, and the challenges of measuring construction noise, Council directed staff to prepare an amendment to Edina Code changing the allowable hours for construction noise from 7 a.m. until 9 p.m. weekdays and from 8 a.m. until 7 p.m. on weekends. RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -53 - ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained in order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable. votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Masica introduced Resolution No. 2007 -53, accepting various donations, and moved approval. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *WAREHOUSE LEASE APPROVED - FIRE DEPARTMENT Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson approving the lease of warehouse office space from Plourde Properties, LLC at 6801 Washington Avenue in Edina until April 30, 2008, during the reconstruction of Fire Station No.1 on Tracy Avenue. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. *RESIDENTIAL RECYCLING CONTRACT EXTENDED Motion made by Member Bennett and seconded by Member Swenson extending the residential recycling contract with Allied Waste Services through December 31, 2008. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. APPOINTMENT MADE TO TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION Mayor Hovland noted that an opening has existed on the Transportation Commission since ,Member Bennett was seated on the Council. He said he was recommending Paul Mooty to fill the vacancy. Mayor Hovland made a motion,. seconded by Member Masica to appoint Paul Mooty to a position on the Edina Transportation Commission to a.term expiring February 1, 2010. Ayes: Bennett, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Swenson approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated April 19, 2007, and . consisting of 31 pages: General Fund $104,183.47; Page 3 Minutes/Edina City Council/April 17,200 Communications Fund $32,270.15; City Hall Debt Service $315.00; Working Capital Fund $30,628.65; Construction Fund $5,876.60; Art Center Fund $3,758.60; Golf Dome Fund $21,544.46; Aquatic Center Fund $28,102.15; Golf Course Fund $42,432.54; Ice Arena Fund $13,180.81; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $31,782.73; Liquor Fund 197,210.29; Utility Fund $82,368.12; Storm Sewer Fund $1,186.36; Recycling Fund $33,958.00; PSTF Agency Fund $13,319.61; TOTAL $642,117.54; and for approval of payment of claims dated April 24, 2007, and consisting of 27 pages: General Fund $186,707.70; Communications Fund $591.08; Working Capital Fund $87,823.13; Construction Fund $1,981.78; Art Center Fund $22,356.17; Golf Dome Fund $3,755.00; Aquatic Center Fund $7,688.63; Golf Course Fund $19,275.70; Ice Arena Fund $679.10; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $12,627.48; Liquor Fund $101,918.15; Utility Fund $16,197.97, Storm Sewer Fund $741.74; PSTF Agency Fund $5,602.26; TOTAL $467,945.89; and for Credit Card Transaction dated April 25, 2007 TOTAL $1,408.92. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -54 ADOPTED AWARD SALE OF SERIES 2007A $5,910,000 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BONDS - FIRE STATION Following a brief presentation and discussion with Finance Director Wallin and Mark Ruff, Ehlers Bond Consultant, Member Masica introduced Resolution No. 2007 -54, awarding sale of series 2007A $5,865,000 capital improvement bonds- Fire Station to Cronin & Company, Inc. and USB Investment Bank. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -55 ADOPTED AWARDING SALE OF SERIES 2007B $8,210,000 UTILITY REVENUE BONDS Following a brief presentation and discussion with Finance Director Wallin and Mark Ruff, Ehlers Bond Consultant, Member Bennett introduced Resolution No. 2007 -55, awarding sale of series 2007B $8,210,000 Utility Revenue Bonds to Piper Jaffray & Company. , Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO.. 2007 -56 ADOPTED AWARDING SALE OF SERIES 2007C $5,870,000 PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT REVOLVING FUND BONDS Following a brief presentation and discussion with Finance Director Wallin and Mark Ruff, Ehlers Bond Consultant, Member Swenson introduced Resolution No. 2.007 -56, awarding sale of series 2007C $5,870,000 Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds to Cronin & Company, Inc. and USB Investment Bank. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. JUNE 5, 2007 SET FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON TODD PARK HOCKEY RINK Following a discussion Council directed staff to send notices to residents within 1000 feet of Todd Park, but to no less than the 604 residents surveyed previously, notifying them of the June 5, 2007, date for a public hearing before the City Council regarding the Todd Park Hockey Rink. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:15 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Page 4 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item: II. A. & II. B. From: Joyce Repya, Assoc. Planner Consent ❑ Information Only F] Date: May 15, 2007 Mgr. Recommends F] To HRA Subject: Edina Heritage Landmark ® To Council Designation: Action ® Motion Z -07 -1 Browndale Bridge Resolution Z -07 -2 Edina Mill Site Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Add the Edina Heritage Landmark zoning designation to the Browndale Bridge and Edina Mill Site. Info/Background: Z- 07- 01 BROWNDALE BRIDGE: The Browndale Bridge is owned by the City of Edina. It has been assigned structure number 92643 in the Minnesota Department of Transportation highway bridge inventory and property identification number HE -EDC -0628 in the Minnesota Historical Society inventory of historic resources in Hennepin County. Description - The Browndale Bridge is a concrete arch bridge that carries Browndale Avenue over Minnehaha Creek a short distance north of 50th Street at the entrance to the Edina Country Club District. The main span of the spandrel - filled arch is 24 feet 8 inches in length; including the concrete abutments, the historic structure is 31 feet long. The bridge deck is 24 feet wide, with a bituminous roadway and 6 -inch concrete curbs; the railings (some of which have been bent as a result of automobile collisions) are steel plates attached to masonry bollards with stone caps. The concrete spillway of the former Edina Mill dam is directly .underneath the bridge; the archaeological remains of the mill are preserved in Dwight Williams Park along the north side of Minnehaha Creek, immediately downstream from the Browndale Bridge. Flared concrete wing walls, built in two phases, protect the bridge abutments. The bridge and abutments have been coated with hand - troweled sand cement grout. Some cracks and spalling are visible on the underside of the barrel vault and the wing walls. Although it has been rated "deficient" by the Minnesota Department of Transportation on the basis of its width and alignment (which do not meet modern highway safety standards), the bridge is considered structurally sound and its load - bearing members are in good condition. The City plans to rehabilitate the bridge and wing walls with new concrete facing that matches the existing rough -sawn board finish, a widened and resurfaced roadway with new curb, and placement of new curb and gutter along the approaches; plans also include embankment slope repairs and replacement of the existing bridge railing with new historically appropriate ornamental metal railing. Issues and Analysis - The first bridge at this site may have been constructed as early as 1860; late - nineteenth century records contain frequent references to a "stone arch bridge" crossing Minnehaha Creek at the Edina Mills locality. The stone bridge was destroyed by flood waters and was rebuilt under the auspices of Hennepin County in 1902; the plans for 'Bridge No. 44" survive in the archives of the Hennepin County Engineer. This iron and timber structure was itself washed away in 1906 and was replaced by the present concrete arch structure, which is in many respects similar to the standardized short -span stone -arch bridge designs developed during the early twentieth century by the Minnesota State Highway Commission. Concrete wing walls were added in 1907 and the entire structure was overhauled in 1909. The earliest bridge inspection records date from 1933. Historical Significance - The Browndale Bridge is historically significant for the engineering heritage embodied in its design and construction. It is a rare, early twentieth century example of a short -span, concrete- arched highway bridge and the only surviving, authenticated standing structure contemporaneous with the Edina Mill (1857- 1932). Contextually, it relates to the broad theme of "The Suburban Landscape (1887 to 1974)" and the local study units "Edina Mills: Agriculture and Rural Life" and " Minnehaha Creek: From Wilderness Stream to Urban Waterway' that were delineated in the 1999 Historic Context Study. The bridge has well documented associations with important events and patterns of events, including settlement and development of the Edina Mills locality, suburban residential development in the Browndale Park and Country Club neighborhoods, and the effects of the automobile on rural and suburban lifeways. The masonry arch span provides physical evidence of the evolution of bridge engineering and the high quality of workmanship that went into its construction. The bridge is also an important part of the Minnehaha Creek cultural landscape and serves to illustrate how the watershed has been shaped by historical changes in land use. Plan of Treatment - The Edina Heritage Preservation Board uses the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties as the authoritative guide for its design review decisions. Within the framework of these standards, and in consultation with the property owner, the Board has adopted the following general and specific guidelines specially tailored to the preservation requirements of the Browndale Bridge: 1) The Browndale Bridge will be preserved in place with stabilization of the historic masonry and ongoing maintenance to sustain its existing form. The preferred preservation treatment is rehabilitation, defined as the process of maintaining the bridge in a state of utility through repairs and minor alterations which make possible an efficient contemporary use while preserving those features which are significant to its historical and engineering values. Repair and replacement of deteriorated features Several times over its history the mill and associated structures were damaged by floodwaters: owing to repeated fillings to prevent bank erosion, the creek bed is largely covered with boulders and large pieces of broken stone, and both banks have been armored with riprap. The archaeological remains of the mill house are located on the left bank (descending) of the creek. The mill was a large timber and masonry structure measuring approximately 40 by 36 feet. The concrete piers and floors, as well as some timber framing members and foundation stones, lie buried under several feet of fill. The turbine pit was filled with mud, sand, and rubble when the site was excavated in 1977. After the archaeological work was completed, the city developed a small interpretation facility on the site, consisting of an information kiosk, a preserved millstone, and an outline of the millhouse walls marked with square wooden posts. Issues and Analysis - The importance of the Minnehaha Creek waterpower resource in early Edina history can hardly be over - estimated. When the area was first settled in the mid- nineteenth century, the creek was seen as an inexhaustible power source that could be harnessed to a wide range of industrial uses. Even after steam engines rendered waterwheels obsolete, the motive power of falling water continued to be an important economic resource. The site was originally part of a quarter - section tract claimed by William Hoyt in 1855. The following year, Hoyt sold his interest in the property to a group of speculators, who included the waterpower development in their plans to develop a townsite called Waterville. The "paper town" of Waterville did not survive the Panic of 1857, but the Waterville Mill (built by local carpenter William Marriott) was an active grist mill when William Rheem and Jonathan T. Grimes acquired the property in 1859. In 1867 the mill passed into the ownership of Daniel H. Buckwalter, who in turn sold the waterpower privilege to Andrew Craik in 1869. Craik and his sons made many improvements to the mill, which they named the Edina Mill, and processed wheat, corn, rye, oats, and barley for the "home" (i.e., local) market. Craik hired George Millam, a fellow Scotsman, to manage the mill, and in 1875 Millam purchased the waterpower from Craik. In 1889, Millam sold the mill to Henry F. Brown, the Minneapolis lumberman who established a large stock farm at Edina. The Edina Mill formed part of the Browndale Farm estate that was purchased by Thorpe Bros. Realty in 1922 for the Country Club development. There are numerous historical photographs and contemporary written descriptions of the Edina Mills complex. The first mill dam appears to have been a relatively crude timber and stone overflow structure designed to be overtopped by the creek. The Craik mill dam was a more elegant stone spillway that redirected part of the creek's flow into an open millrace or flume that directed the falling water against the paddles of a large, overshot waterwheel, which created the mechanical power that caused three run of burr stones to grind the grain. George Millam reportedly replaced the old overshot waterwheel with three hydraulic shaft turbines, a more efficient type of waterwheel that required the water from the sluice to be directed downward through penstocks or nozzles to push against the curved metal blades of the turbines. Both the overshot waterwheel and the turbine systems required ' only a relatively small volume of water to operate. When the Edina Mill was running at its peak of performance, the mill dam generated as much as fifteen feet of hydraulic head (about 50 horsepower) and could grind roughly 150 bushels of wheat, oats, corn, or other small grains daily. (In addition to grain milling, the Edina mill dam also provided power for a blacksmith and machine shop by means of a wire rope or cable.) Craik and his sons were merchant millers, in that they shipped part of the mill's product in barrels to market in Minneapolis. The quality of the flour made at the Edina Mill was probably less than satisfactory, however, because the hard spring wheat grown in Minnesota during the nineteenth century produced a grade of flour that was inferior to that made from winter wheat, which was softer, easier to grind, and produced a whiter flour. For making cornmeal, oatmeal, pearl barley, and animal feed, the old French burr stones could be set farther apart, with fewer grindings and screenings required to produce a marketable product. Whenever the creek's natural flow diminished below a certain level, the mill had to shut down. This happened most often during periods of prolonged summer drought and when late - winter ice jams blockaded Minnehaha Creek upstream from the mill. The effect of upstream dams also reduced the available hydraulic head at Edina; the construction of a water control structure at the mouth of Minnehaha Creek in 1893 forced Browndale Farm to use a gasoline engine to power the feed mill; after the new dam was built at Gray's Bay in 1897, the district court indemnified Brown $2000 for the loss of his waterpower. In 1906 a severe flood washed out the mill dam and the county replaced the stone structure with the existing concrete spillway. The Edina Mill appears to have closed for good around this time, although the millhouse and related structures were not torn down until 1932. The site was later used as a dump. Historical Significance - The Edina Mills Archaeological Site is historically significant because of its association with the Edina waterpower development and because the archaeological data it contains has potential value in answering important research questions. The 1977 archaeological investigation appears to have excavated only about 5% of the mill complex: the current state of knowledge about the site suggests that both Dwight William Park and the areas bordering the lower end of the Mill Pond have good potential for undisturbed cultural deposits associated with nineteenth century settlement and development activities. Contextually, the site relates to the broad theme of "The Agricultural Landscape (1851 to 1959)" and to the local study units "Edina Mills: Agriculture and Rural Life" and " Minnehaha Creek: From Wilderness Stream to Urban Waterway," delineated in the 1999 Historic Context Study. Plan of Treatment - The Edina Heritage Preservation Board uses the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties as the authoritative guide for its design review decisions. Within the framework of these standards, and in consultation with the property owner, the Board has adopted the following general and specific guidelines specially tailored to the preservation requirements of the Edina Mill Archaeological Site: 1) The Edina Mills Archaeological Site is the heritage preservation component of Dwight Williams Park and the Mill Pond; every reasonable effort shall be made to provide compatible uses for these publicly owned lands that require minimal alteration of the land surfaces above and under water. 2) Protective measures should be developed to safeguard the physical condition of known or suspected archaeological features from erosion or other damage caused by natural or human forces. 3) Archaeological features should be retained intact, whenever possible. Future archaeological investigations should emphasize non - intrusive, non - destructive methods of investigation such as remote sensing. 4) Stream bank stabilization should be accomplished in such a manner that the work detracts as little as possible from the archaeological site's setting and environment. 5) Adjacent road construction and maintenance, flood control and water quality improvements should be conducted in such a manner that disturbance of terrain in and around the archaeological site is minimized. 6) Whenever archaeological resources must be disturbed by public works construction, recovery of archaeological data shall be undertaken in conformance with current professional practices. � Reconstruction of all or part of the historic mill complex for public interpretation may be appropriate, provided that sufficient historical documentation exists to insure an accurate reproduction of the original buildings) or structure(s). Reconstruction should include measures to preserve important archaeological resources intact, wherever possible. should be based on accurate duplications of the original, based on historical, pictorial, or physical evidence. 2) The distinguishing historical qualities and character of the bridge (i.e., its height, shape, and form) should not be significantly altered or destroyed. 3) Rehabilitate the surfaces of the bridge and wing walls by coating them with concrete, duplicating the original finish as closely as possible while preserving the existing shape of the structure. 4) Replace the existing railings with historically appropriate ornamental metal railings based on historical and pictorial evidence. 5) Signs, lighting, fencing, and walkways should be compatible with the character of the bridge and provide a minimum intrusion on its size, scale, material, and color. 6) Recognize the special problems inherent in the bridge's alignment and structural systems when complying with traffic safety and structural engineering requirements so that the essential character of the bridge is preserved intact. 7) Investigate alternative safety measures that preserve the historical integrity of. the bridge. The City should make every effort to retain the historic bridge as a functional part of the modern transportation system while preserving its distinguishing original qualities and character. If it can no longer be used for vehicle traffic, the bridge should be adapted for use as a pedestrian and bicycle crossing. 8) In the event that the bridge can no longer be preserved in place for reasons of public safety, the preferred treatment to mitigate the effects of demolition is removal to another, similar location where it could be preserved and rehabilitated. If relocation is not viable, the effects of demolition should be mitigated by documenting the bridge with measured drawings, large- format negative photographs, and written information to the standards of the Historic American Engineering Record (HAER). Z- 07- 02 EDINA MILL SITE: The Edina Mills site is owned by the City of Edina and was added to the city's initial heritage preservation zoning district by Ordinance No. 811 -A107 in 1977. A National Register of Historic Places nomination form was prepared by Foster Dunwiddie in the late 1970s but was never submitted to the state review committee. The site has been assigned site inventory number 21HE0245 by the Office of the State Archaeologist. Description - The Edina Mill Archaeological Site is located on Minnehaha Creek in Dwight Williams Park, a unit of the city park system. The only extant surface structure associated with the historic mill is the mill dam, which is located underneath the Browndale Bridge. This structure is a concrete gravity spillway with an uncontrolled crest approximately 24 feet in length. The abutment walls blend into the stream banks, which are high and have steep slopes. The raceway or flume from the Mill Pond, now filled in, runs for a distance of approximately 34 feet underneath the embankment formed by Browndale Avenue; the intake is buried under several feet of alluvium, fill, and riprap. A considerable amount of silt and debris has accumulated in front of the upstream face of the mill dam; below the spillway, a large scatter of rocks and boulders line the stilling basin. The creek bed and banks are mostly gravel and coarse sand, which scours easily. � T ST. LOUT$ A "' ' �+ 1� �Y Lukr � t • r_ar S .� . o f aT ><� PARK �c h xr I Calhoun j V.1 I cuff, y Q i}� 37 n 1 rjc r n S V • 7ri rr. �, ` � V 1; m o u . �� � - , v. a �<'� : : .t- ` ��'_ "• ,tF 3 � � 5 o to < ° ra s1UNNEAP011S u rtt •� it .t a�, ? r, °`tl° "�„r� er. S? ^ ' Lake a _ 1 _ / Hartict .\ ° u 1�6 Qlk yt-- • =,r�:w C - j u N ,ri :. tr .s, � r L r 5•rn_re 1r I f • Y h, a �,� � �r � «a - �ti �1 . � �, . n : � � , �• Browndale - a�:r,• Bride JJ" Fill,x1 A yy M p m r, < cr. ° v. m •,t ;, rr. � - � �� � �' i l � : � � � ;r �I G � tt u J � d If (�� ++u y ■''�.� ,tnM M os" -'aassn EDINA o, B � 3.d•' n .w, rc., nT .. ,.ccr+ ruu -1 � -� crr - G a£' � _ -.e •i $ a M m rr. it gNh k s c, dr6 •T• +� ra� �j CIIrl/Y RmD•.QT IJ. �'� i r +1 I� "� v' :T �5 L'�¢ � � � snu •:1. � i S� � k � r J J c � sa St � 4 �. � r n 11fA SJ•SiV. � T.l . '• T. � 15 .. b '�' I _ _ �_ � � M al' � � 'i . �. oc? K,.". �r4s�y 0` �.',ar � ylFsv m.t s,. Q s sva j � {� ' I•�.I � r� ars_ e g � fun +•, M3 . sa/ 9 r5 G r v v r cif !� .n i:r- c ` . A = - �• � � •�� i � "�. wA ��ro� � '! i' 9 � °� rtes, �v- ca � v .i., fat s• � Y � � r $ 1 ,..; I v h� � -. -. � V RICHFIELD L MAP OCATION Browndale Bridge, 2006 (camera facing northeast). Browndale Bridge and Edina Mill Dam, 2006 (camera facing southwest). P Sol,. LOUIS PARK to RD I N A W TZ t.. 10 1 441- FW1 IZZ) o' a] - I v I 'I •c11.1 1 1 is. MINNEAPOLIS 0 Edina Mill Site Icif L r, k 6. Harr i t 91. RICHFIELD Ll I I j LOCATION MAP Edina Mill Site, 2006 (camera facing southeast). Millstones, Edina Mill Site, 2006 (camera facing northwest). Interpretive Kiosk, Edina Mill Site. Edina Mills, circa 1893 Edina Mills, circa 1893 Edina Mills, circa 1920 MEMBERS PRESENT: Acting Chair Mike Fischer, Julie Risser, Michael Schroeder, Arlene Forrest MEMBERS ABSENT: John Lonsbury and Floyd Grabiel STAFF PRESENT: Cary Teague, Joyce Repya, Jackie OTHERS PRESENT: Robert Vogel, HPB Consultant The minutes of th 'April II. NEW B- QSINESS \: 7 - Z -07 -2 Cit 'yo Ed Edina , er Brown gal, al, Edina ill MINUTE SUMMARY City of Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, April 25, 2007, 7:00 PM Edina City Hall Council Chambers 4801 West 50th Street 7, meeti n filed as submitted. Landmark Designation Ms. Repya addressed the Commission and informed them the City is seeking Edina Heritage Landmark designation for the Browndale Bridge and the Edina Mill site. Ms. Repya explained both sites are owned by the City of Edina and after designation would be protected by a Plan of Treatment as part of the city's zoning ordinance. Continuing, Ms. Repya said the Browndale Bridge is a concrete arch bridge that carries Browndale over Minnehaha Creek and is one of the entrances to the Edina Country Club District. The bridge is considered an historic structure and is 31 feet long. The Edina Mill site is located on Minnehaha Creek in the Dwight Williams Park. The Mill Site contains the archaeological remains of the mill house walls which are marked with square wooden posts. The Mill site also contains an information kiosk and a preserved millstone. Concluding, Ms. Repya explained the archaeological mill site is significant because of its association with Edina waterpower development and its use to process wheat, corn, rye, oaks, etc. for the local markpt."', /� Ms. Repya asked the Commission to r( requested designations to include a Plan of T� continued preservation of both sites. Ms. Ref Preservation Board uses the Secretary of the, of Historic Properties. Ms. Repya stated staff Landmark Designation for the Browndale Brid tailored standards and guidelines: 1) The Browndale Bridge will be pre i historic masonry and ongoing - ali The preferred preservation t eatrp process of maintaining the b dge(ii minor alterations which make rossit preserving those feaX!ai whI& engineering values. p and r should be based oi� acF6rate du historical, pictorial,�r p ysical evide 2) The distinguishing hist rical qu, heigFit, shape, and�form) should afd,approvd of the it f * each site to ensure the dl h�,Ediir Heritage s S�andardKor Trea men nerids approval '��.f��the :d on the following pecially ved- in.,place with stabilJ ation of the enance"to sustain H�sfexisting form. 4)s rehabilitation, defined as the a;ttate of utililthrough repairs and an/effic ent contemporary use while re ,sign ifi- ar0-~ t° to its historical and AacemeAt Of deteriorated features _ications of the original, based on s and character of the bridge (i.e., its be significantly altered or destroyed. ibilitate -th surfaces of the b idge and wing walls by coating them concrete, duplicating the original finish as closely as possible while Irving the existing shape of the structure. Replace the existing,failings with historically appropriate ornamental metal rgUings based on h4toricA and pictorial evidence. 5) Signs; -I hting,"fencjrfg, and walkways should be compatible with the character the bri, ge and provide a minimum intrusion on its size, scale, material, an c"I r. 6) Recognize the special problems inherent in the bridge's alignment and structural systems when complying with traffic safety and structural engineering requirements so that the essential character of the bridge is preserved intact. 2 7) Investigate alternative safety measures that preserve the historical integrity of the bridge. The City should make every effort to retain the historic bridge as a functional part of the modern transportation system while preserving its distinguishing original qualities and character. If it can no longer be used for vehicle traffic, the bridge should be adapted for use as a pedestrian and bicycle crossing. 8) In the event that the bridge can no longer be pressed in place for reasons of public safety, the preferred treatme t to ritig�e the effects of demolition is removal to another, si�nifat location where it could be preserved and rehabilitated. If relocdtion�is nO viable, the effects of demolition should be mitigated by dopumenting1he„brid. .ge wi*,rq"slared drawings, large- format negative photograph, an� written, information to the standards of the Historic American Engineering, Record (HkER). j In conclusion Ms. Repya said staff also recorMT6hcts approval of Landmark Designation for the Edina Mill Site based on the following\�ecia�r tailored standards and guidelines: 1) The Edina Mills Archaeological, /Site is Nh heritage preservation component of Dwight William$ Park a 6 the Mill Pond; every reasonable effort shall be made to provi �a colnpa�tibta us for these publicly owned lands that require minimal altekation of the land surfaces above and under water. _ I �1 __-1/ t 2) Protective measufes 'should be deveQpedAo safeguard the physical condition of known or suspected archaeological features from erosion or other damage- caused Oy natu'iia or human forces. 3) archaeological features shoyd be\retained -intact, whenever possible. j Future archaeological investigatipna should emphasize non - intrusive, non- ! destructive methods of investigation such as remote sensing. 4) Stream bank stabilization should be accomplished in such a manner that the w�br detracts as little s possible from the archaeological site's setting -a d env?onment. '// 5) Adjacent road\ construction and maintenance, flood control and water quality kh rovemprits should be conducted in such a manner that disturbance b terrain in and around the archaeological site is minimized. 6) Whenever archaeological resources must be disturbed by public works construction, recovery of archaeological data shall be undertaken in conformance with current professional practices. �41 7) Reconstruction of all or part of the historic mill complex for public interpretation may be appropriate, provided that sufficient historical documentation exists to insure an accurate reproduction of the original building(s) or structure(s). Reconstruction should include measures to preserve important archaeological resources intact, wherever possible. COMMENTS FROM CONSULTANT: Mr. Vogel explained the requested acti6n `for the Browndale Bridge and Edina Mill site is' a rda: manage and preserve both properties. Mr. \fogel ,add a rare example of one of the earliest arch bridges engineers. COMMISSION ACTION: Commissioner Brown moved ,t6 recoi Designation for both projects as outli • ed by city seconded the motion. All voted aye; �otigri carries fr� i&\Designation for an"table way to nd eritag !� Landmark f. Commissioner Forrest 4 MINNESOTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY 26 January 2001 Ms. Joyce Repya City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina MN 55424 -1394 RE: Local designation of the Edina Mills Archaeological Site, Browndale Ave. @ 50th St., MHS Referral No.: 2007 -0511; and the Browndale Bridge, Browndale Ave. over Minnehaha Creek, MHS Referral No.: 2007 -0512. Dear Joyce, Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the above referenced designations. They have been reviewed pursuant to Minnesota Statutes §471.193, subd. 6., and Edina City Code §850.20 subd. 2. The Edina Mills Archaeological Site is historically significant at the local level due to its relationship with the development of waterpower in Edina beginning in the mid -19th century, and because the archaeological data the mills contain has the potential to yield information important to Edina's early history. The Edina Mills Archaeological Site is eligible for local designation under Subd. 2.A.1. for its association with the early development of Edina, and under Subd. 2.A.4. for its potential to yield archaeological data. Constructed in 1906, the Browndale Bridge is a concrete arch bridge that carries Browndale Avenue over Minnehaha Creek near 50th Street. The Browndale Bridge is an ideal candidate for local designation under Subd. 2.A.3. because it embodies the distinctive characteristics of a method of construction as a good example of a short-span, concrete arch bridge. If you have any questions regarding our assessment of these properties, please contact this office. Sincerely, 1 Britta L. Bloomberg Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer 345 Kellogg Boulevard West/ Saint Paul, Minnesota 55102 - 1906 /Telephone 651- 296 -6126 Joyce Repya .. From: bright dornblaser [dornb001 @umn.edu] Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 12:10 PM To: Joyce Repya Subject: Browndale Bridge Dear Mr. Repya: This is to record strong support for the designations as Edina Heritage Landmarks. I interpret this to mean that the configuration, dimensions and essential aesthetic aspects of the bridge will not be changed except perhaps in some minor ways. The present bridge and Edina Mill Site are important heritages to preserve for our children and grandchildren. I anticipate you will receive adverse reactions from those who want more convenience in driving to and from the Country Club using the bridge. From my experience and from what I have observed the current situation is not a problem, if just a small amount of patience is provided in a very small number of circumstances. Sincerely Bright M. Dornblaser 4630 Drexel Av Edina, MN. 55424 1 RESOLUTION No. 2007 -60 GRANTING EDINA HERITAGE LANDMARK DESIGNATION TO THE BROWNDALE BRIDGE AND ADOPTING THE PLAN OF TREATMENT WEST 50"' STREET & BROWNDALE AVENUE City of Edina WHEREAS, the Browndale Bridge is historically significant for the engineering heritage embodied in its design and construction, and WHEREAS, the Browndale Bridge is a rare, early twentieth century example of a short- span, concrete - arched highway bridge, and WHEREAS, the Browndale Bridge is the only surviving, authenticated standing structure contemporaneous with the Edina Mill (1857 — 1932), and WHEREAS, the Edina Heritage Preservation Board did create a plan of treatment designed to identify the goals and procedures for preservation, and WHEREAS, the Edina Heritage Preservation Board on November 14, 2006, did review and approve to nominate the Browndale Bridge for designation as an Edina Heritage Landmark, and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Historical Society on January 26, 2007, did support the nomination of the Edina Mill Site as an Edina Heritage Landmark, WHEREAS, the Edina Planning Commission on April 25, 2007, did also review and recommend to approve the nomination of the Browndale Bridge for designation as an Edina Heritage Landmark. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council adds the Heritage Landmark zoning designation to the Browndale Bridge and adopts the plan of treatment designed to identify the goals and procedures for preservation. Adopted this 15th day of May, 2007. City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 RESOLUTION No. 2007 -61 GRANTING EDINA HERITAGE LANDMARK DESIGNATION TO THE EDINA MILL SITE AND ADOPTING THE PLAN OF TREATMENT WEST 50TH STREET & BROWNDALE AVENUE City of Edilla l WHEREAS, the Edina Mill Site is historically significant because of its association with the Minnehaha Creek waterpower resource in early Edina history, and WHEREAS, the Edina Mill Site contains archaeological data with potential value in answering important research questions, and WHEREAS, the Edina Heritage Preservation Board did create a plan of treatment designed to identify the goals and procedures for preservation of the Edina Mill Site, and WHEREAS, the Edina Heritage Preservation Board on November 14, 2006, did review and approve to nominate the Edina Mill Site for designation as an Edina Heritage Landmark, and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Historical Society on January 26, 2007, did support the nomination of the Edina Mill Site as an Edina Heritage Landmark, and WHEREAS, the Edina Planning Commission on April 25, 2007, did also review and recommend to approve the nomination of the Edina Mill Site for designation as an Edina Heritage Landmark. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council adds the Heritage Landmark zoning designation to the Edina Mill Site and adopts the plan of treatment designed to identify the goals and procedures for preservation. Adopted this 15th day of May, 2007. City Hall (952) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (952) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (952) 826 -0379 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Wayne D. Houle, PE City Engineer Date: May 15, 2007 Subject: Ordinance No. 2007 -07 — An Ordinance Amending Subsection 1115.02 Irrigation Ban Recommendation: Agenda Item # III. A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion Adopt Ordinance 2007 -07, see revised attached ordinance. Info /Background: Resolution Ordinance Discussion We are proposing a revised irrigation ban or lawn sprinkling policy for the City of Edina. This new ordinance is being proposed to ensure adequate water supply for all uses including firefighting, to balance peak day water use, and to promote water conservation. During the first reading of this ordinance on May 1, 2007, Council directed staff to clarify the exempt properties or uses, the permit process, along with a surcharge amount and process. Subdivision 5 now clarifies the permit process: Subd. S. Exempt Properties. Upon written request and approval by the Ci Manager, or his designee the.... and, the potential exempt properties: ....the following properties are authorized to irrigate at times other than permitted in Subd. 1, 2. 3. and 4 hereof 1. Nurseries and similar businesses that grow plant, trees or sod for resale; Item III. A. Page 2 of 2 2. QU owned playfields and parks: May 15, 2007 3. Newly sodded or grass seeded areas for a period of fourteen days (14) days. and, the proposed surcharge plan: Surcharges for violating the Irrigation Bans are determined based on the number of water restriction violations issued to the owner in the previous three years and are as follows: First offense- Written warning Second offense- $50 Third offense- $100 Fourth offense- $200 Each additional offense (five or more)- $300 If the Council adopts the ordinance staff will prepare an aggressive marketing plan for this ordinance change. Staff would recommend adopting this ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. 2007 -07 CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 1 AND 11 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING WATER EMERGENCIES AND IRRIGATION BANS THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINESOTA ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Section 1115.02 of the Edina City Code is amended to provide: 1115.02. Irrigation Ban. Dufin^ the pefied ftem May 1 to SeptembeF 1 ofea,h - eaf, City water may be used for irrigation subject to the following: Subd. 1. Even Numbered' Addresses. All properties with an address ending with an even digit may use city water for irrigation purposes on even - numbered dates only. Subd. 2. Odd Numbered Addresses. All properties with an address ending with an odd digit may use city water for irrigation purposes on odd - numbered dates only. Subd. 3. Notwithstanding Subd. 1 and Subd. 2, Homeowners' associations and apartment complexes that provide a common irrigation system may water every other day on a day designated by the owner if they registered in advance with the City's Public Works Department. Subd. 4. No Mid -day Watering. No property may use any water for irrigation purposes during the hours of 11:00 AM through 5:00 PM of any day. Subd. 5. Exempt Properties. Upon written request and approval by the City Manager, or his designee the following_ properties are authorized to irrigate at times other than permitted in Subd. 1, 2, 3, and 4 hereof: 1. Nurseries and similar businesses that grow plants, trees or sod for resale; 2. City owned playfields and parks; 3. Newly sodded or grass seeded areas for a period of fourteen days (14) days. Subd. 6. Exempt Water Sources. The requirements of Subd. 1, Subd. 2, Subd. 3, Subd. 4, and Subd. 5 shall not apply to irrigation with privately owned wells or irrigation with water supplied from the City of Minneapolis. 131657 SECTION 2. Section 1115.03 of the Edina City Code is amended to provide: 1115.03. Penalty. Any violation of th s See fien shall be a petty aisde.,,a.,nen Failure to comply with restrictions or prohibitions imposed by this Section shall result in a surcharge for water service for each day of violation in an amount set forth in Section 185 of the City Code which shall be add,;Li w Manager, or his designee, shall mail a Notice of Surcharge to the violator upon imposition of a surcharge. SECTION 3. Section 185.02 Schedule A of the Edina City Code is amended by adding the following: SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE AMOUNT 1115 1115.03 Water Surcharges Surcharges for violating the Irrigation Bans are determined based on the number of water restriction violations issued to an owner in the - previous three years and are as follows: First offense — Written warnin Second offense - $50 Third offense - $100 Fourth offense - $200 Each additional offense (five or more) - $300 SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication. ADOPTED this day of , 2007, by the City Council of Edina, Minnesota. CITY OF EDINA ATTEST: Gordon Hughes, City Manager 131657 James B. Hovland, Mayor } ;f Recommendation: Adopt the ordinance regarding building height and minimum setback regulations. Information/Background: "Massing" refers to the problem of homes being built or added on to in established neighborhoods that are larger than existing homes and may be out of character with the style of existing homes. Such homes are built on existing lots after tearing down or adding on to a smaller and less expensive home; and may also be built on undeveloped or newly - platted lots. This problem is growing throughout the metro area, including the central cities. Over the past year, staff, the massing task force, the planning commission and city council have examined this issue. After careful consideration, changes are now recommended to the zoning ordinance to address the issue. The following report provides information and background to consider the ordinance amendment. Existing City Code Tools Edina's current zoning ordinance does have some good tools that already address the massing issue. The city's 25 -30% building coverage requirement, and increased setback REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item III. B. Consent From: Cary Teague Planning Director Information Only Date: June 5, 2007 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: A zoning ordinance amendment regarding Action ® Motion minimum setback and building height requirements Resolution in the R -1, Single - Dwelling Unit District. ® Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: Adopt the ordinance regarding building height and minimum setback regulations. Information/Background: "Massing" refers to the problem of homes being built or added on to in established neighborhoods that are larger than existing homes and may be out of character with the style of existing homes. Such homes are built on existing lots after tearing down or adding on to a smaller and less expensive home; and may also be built on undeveloped or newly - platted lots. This problem is growing throughout the metro area, including the central cities. Over the past year, staff, the massing task force, the planning commission and city council have examined this issue. After careful consideration, changes are now recommended to the zoning ordinance to address the issue. The following report provides information and background to consider the ordinance amendment. Existing City Code Tools Edina's current zoning ordinance does have some good tools that already address the massing issue. The city's 25 -30% building coverage requirement, and increased setback of 6 inches for every foot over 15 feet in height, does limit building size. Additionally, the city's median lot width and size requirement also keep new subdivisions in areas f with lots that are larger than 9,000 square feet and wider than 75 feet these areas consistent with the existing neighborhoods. Further amendments would "beef up" Edina's ordinance, such as further restricting the building height in residential districts, increasing side yard setback requirements, the building/ hard surface coverage requirement, and /or adding a floor area ratio requirement. Staff conducted a survey of 15 cities to compare how other communities regulate single - family homes to address the massing issue. (See survey on pages A3 -A9.) , Building height. Edina's current height maximum is 30 feet. The measurement is taken from the ground elevation at street side of a home to the mid point of a pitched roof. Edina's height maximum is generally the same and at times more restrictive than other cities. Nine of the 15 cities allow up to 35 feet in height, though half of those measure from the average elevation at the ground. The remaining cities are at 30 feet. Based on previous discussions with the Planning Commission and City Council, staff is recommending changes on how height is measured. Where to start the height measurement? There have been instances where grades have been altered by bringing in fill and building retaining walls, which has resulted in making a house appear taller even though it meets the height requirement. Also, Edina starts the height measurement at the front yard elevation, and does not take into account walkout or lookout lots where the grade changes front to back. Therefore, staff is recommending starting the measurement from the average elevation of the highest and lowest points within five feet of the foundation. There may be times however, that would require possible exceptions to the proposed average elevation rule. Those instances would be to correct an existing drainage problem, or to get the house above an existing sewer or water table. In those instances, a variance may be justified. Of the cities surveyed, five of the 15 cities measure from the average elevation. Three of the cities calculate from the highest grade unless there is a grade drop of more than 10 feet from the front to back. In that instance, the measurement is taken from the lowest point, and the height requirement is, increased by 10 feet. Additionally, staff is recommending that when a house is torn down, the low floor elevation,for the new home may not be more than one foot above the low floor elevation of the home that was removed. This will further prevent homes from being built up higher than adjacent homes. Where to end the measurement? Another consideration would be to measure height to the ridge line or top of the roof, rather than to the mid- point. Of the 15 cities surveyed only Apple Valley and Bloomington measure building height to the top of any roof. (See page A4.) Apple Valley's height requirement is 35 feet. Houses in Bloomington can be up to 40 feet tall, but may not be more than 2 stories. All other cities measure height the same way as Edina, to the mid point of a pitched roof. Staff is recommending that the mid point measurement continue. Building/hard surface coverage. Edina's maximum building coverage of 25 -30% is generally in line with those cities' that regulate lot coverage. Of the 15 cities surveyed, 8 do not regulate lot coverage in the low- density residential districts. The more restrictive communities include Bloomington, which has an impervious surface maximum of 35 %, and Eagan, which has a building coverage maximum of 20 -25 %. (See pages A4 and A5.) The City of Minneapolis was not formally surveyed, but they require a maximum building coverage of 60% and are proposing an amendment to 50 %. Minneapolis has a hardcover maximum of 75% and is considering an amendment to 65% to address the issue of massing. (See recent article from the Star Tribune on pages A10 -A11.) Floor area ratio. FAR's are defined in the zoning code as "the gross floor area divided by the lot area." A maximum FAR, depending on lot size could be considered, along with a median FAR, and/or a not to exceed the largest FAR in the neighborhood. Establishing a FAR for single - family homes would limit the maximum size of a house based on the lot area -- the larger the lot area, the larger the house. As an example, the maximum floor area of a house on a 9,000- square -foot lot with a FAR of 0.50 would be 4,500 square feet (.40 x 9,000). Current use of FAR. Edina has a maximum FAR requirement for all zoning districts, except R -1, R -2, and PRD 1 -4 zones. The current requirements are as follows: PRD -5, rest homes convalescent homes and nursing homes: 1.2 PSR-4, multi- family primarily senior housing: 1.2 MDD, mixed development: non - residential 0.5; infixed non- residential and residential aggregate 1.0 POD, office: 0.5 PCD -1, commercial: 1.0 PCD -2, commercia1:1.5 PCD -3, commercial: 0.5 -1.0 depending on location PID, industrial: 0.5 -0.6 RMD, medical: 1.0 Applying a Median FAR Requirement in Edina. The Planning Commission recommended staff examine a neighborhood median floor area ratio requirement, similar to the city's regulation for minimum lot sizes. Staff ran the median floor area ratio for eight recently built homes. (See pages A76- A84.) With the exception of 5117 Ridge Road, all of the homes would have had to be reduced significantly if a median FAR requirement were applied. Most notably the 3 home at 6128 Westridge Boulevard would have been limited to 2,450 square feet of livable area above grade, and a 6,395 square foot home was built. (See page A83.) The home at 5201 Halifax would have been limited to 1,622 square feet, and a 3,504 square foot home was built. (See page A81.) The home at 5617 Chowen would have been limited to 1,318 square feet in livable area above grade, and a 2,616 square foot home was build. (See pages A77.) If the City were to require a median FAR requirement, it would likely significantly reduce, if not eliminate homes from being torn down and rebuilt in Edina. It is not likely that someone would tear down a home, to build roughly the same size home that was torn down. Staff is not recommending a median FAR requirement. Practices in other cities. Staff surveyed several suburban cities in the Twin Cities area to determine FAR practices. None of the cities had a FAR requirement for single - family homes, although, FAR's are common for multi- family, commercial and industrial uses. The charts on pages A4 -A9 show the cities surveyed and general building requirements. The City of Minneapolis is considering an FAR of .5 to address the massing issue. (See newspaper article on pages A10 -A11.) Minneapolis has many areas with lots, that are 5,000 square feet in size, that are being redeveloped with homes that are approaching 5,000 finished square feet. Staff also researched several national cities-and found several that use FAR requirements for single - family homes. (See pages A24 -A42.) Cities that have a FAR requirement for single - family homes usually exclude detached buildings, such as sheds and detached garages. Graduated FAR. Some cities use a graduated FAR requirement -- the maximum allowed FAR increases inversely with lot size. In other words, the house size may increase as the lot size decreases. Given the city's existing ordinance has a different regulation for lots greater than and less than 9,000 square feet could be established. Conditional Use Permit. In surveying other cities, staff found that some use a conditional use permit to give their city councils some discretion in allowing homes that exceed the FAR, but would be consistent with the character of an established neighborhood. One approach would be to allow a conditional use permit where the majority. of homes on the same street are at least as large as the proposed home. Advantages of FAR include: Floor area ratios are the most direct tool for restricting building mass, based on lot area. • FAR's are an objective standard that avoids inconsistent, subjective decisions on neighborhood character or building design with each application. 4 Disadvantages of FAR include: • With the variety of lot sizes and neighborhoods in the City, it may be difficult to find a .FAR that works city -wide. Council would have more difficulty denying a specific proposal that met the allowed FAR. • FAR limits do not necessarily address setbacks and building height concerns. Staff is not recommending an FAR standard at this time. The planning commission will continue to study the issue. Recommended Changes The proposed changes to the zoning ordinance to address the above issues are summarized as follows: Height. Building height would be measured from the existing grade, to prevent builders from filling in around a foundation to meet the height requirement. The average elevation would be used, rather than just the front elevation to take into account sloping lots. Additionally, the existing basement elevation would not be allowed to increase more than one foot for a home that is torn down and rebuilt. Side yard setback. A sliding scale of setback requirements based on lot width would slightly increase the separation between houses. Exceptions. The Council recommended eliminating bay windows that don't extend to the ground level. This would combat the issue of allowing three feet of building into the setback if the wall is brought in at ground level. f Applying the New Ordinance to Recently Built Homes Staff reviewed thirteen recently approved house plans within the City, and applied the proposed ordinance. (See pages A47 -A75.) As demonstrated, in several instances, the plans would have needed to be slightly revised to either reduce height or increase setback. ORDINANCE NO. 2007- 08 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY CODE CONCERNING MINIMUM SETBACKS AND BUILDING HEIGHT The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. Sub Section 850.03, Subdivision 3, is hereby amended as follows: Building Height or Structure Height. )red greURd elevation adjoiRing the bu4ld4F;g at the Uent building line to the the highest point of the The distance measured from the average existing ground elevation of the highest and lowest points within a five foot horizontal distance from the exterior building foundation to the highest point of a flat roof, or the average height of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof. If a hirret rises above the hiahest point on the roof. the height shall be measured to Section 2. Sub Section 850.07, Subdivision 6 is hereby amended as follows: Subd.6. Exceptions to Setback Requirements. A. Overhanging eaves not supported by posts or pillars, and bay windows not eAenoing to the , which do not project more than three feet into the required setback and which are not within three feet of a lot line. A4 I Section 3. Sub Section 850.11, Subdivision 6.13, is hereby amended as follows: B. Minimum Setbacks (subject to the requirements of paragraph A. of Subd. 7 of this Subsection 850.11.) ho-k Front Side Interior Side Yard Rear Street Street Yard 1. Single dwelling unit 30' 15' 10' 25' buildings on lots 75 feet or more in width. 7 Cinnle dwelling snit buildings OR lets less #ian-75 feet in wedth-. 45! 5! 2,51 2. Single dwelling unit 30' 15' The required interior side 25' buildings on lots more yard setback of 5 feet shall increase by 113 foot N than 60 feet in width but less than 75 feet inches) for each foot that the lot width exceeds 60 feet. in width. 3. Single dwelling unit 30' 15' 5' 25' buildings on-lots less than 60 feet in width 3 4. Buildings and structures accessory to single dwelling unit buildings: a. Detached garages, -- 15'. 3' 3' tool sheds, greenhouses and garden houses entirely within the rear yard, including the eaves. b. attached garages, tool 30' 15' 5' 25' sheds, greenhouses and garden houses. c. detached garages, tool -- 15' 5' 5' sheds, greenhouses and garden houses not entirely within the rear yard. ho-k d. unenclosed decks and 30' 15' 5' 5' patios e. swimming pools, 30' 15' 10' 10' including appurtenant equipment and required decking. f. tennis courts,. .30' 15' 5' 5' basketball courts, sports courts, hockey and skating rinks,, and other similar recreational accessory uses including appurtenant fencing and lighting. 30' 15' 5' 5' g. all other accessory buildings and structures ¢5. Other Uses: a. All conditional use 50' 50' 50' 50' buildings or structures including accessory thereto except parking lots, day care facilities, pre - schools and nursery schools 50' 50' 50' 50' b. Driving ranges, tennis courts, maintenance buildings and swimming pools accessory to a golf course. 30' 35' 35' 35' c. Day care facilities, pre- schools and nursery schools. �aa Section 4. Sub Section 850.11, Subdivision 7, is hereby amended to add the following: H. Rebuilt home. On a home that is to be rebuilt after a tear down. the lowest floor elevation of the new home may not be more than one foot above the lowest floor elevation of the home that was torn down. Section 5. Passed and adopted this day of. , 2007. ATTEST: City Clerk kib Mayor Survey of Cities Single- family residential home & lot standards b3 Apple Valle Zoning R -5 R -2 R -3 Min. lot area 15,000 18,000 11,000 Min. side setback 10' (5' detached garage) 10' (20' detached garage) 10' (10' detached garage) Min. rear setback 30' (10' detached garage) 30' (10' detached garage) 30' (10' detached garage) Max. building height* 35' 35' 35' FAR None None None Max. building coverage None None None Max. impervious surface None None None * Measured from the first above - grade, habitable floor to the highest point of a flat roof, or the highest gable of a pitched roof. (Top of pitched roof) Blaine Zoning R -1 R -1 A R -1 AA Min. lot area 10,000 12,150 10,800 Min. side setback 10' (5' detached garage) 10' (5' detached garage) 10' (5' detached garage) Min. rear setback 30' (5' detached garage) 35' (5' detached garage) 30' (5' detached ara e Max. building height* 30' 35' 30' FAR None None None Max. building coverage None None None Max. impervious surface None None None * Measured from the grade of the building to the cornice of a flat roof and the mean distance of the highest gable on a pitched or hip roof. (Mid point of pitched roof] Bloomin ton Zoning R -1 RS -1 Min. lot area 11,000 33,000 Min. side setback 10' 5' detached garage) 10' 5' detached garage) Min. rear setback 30'(10' detached garage) 30' 10' detached garage) Max. building hei ht* 19 -40 feet depending on setback (2-story limit 19 -40 feet depending on setback (2-story limit FAR None None Max. building coverage None None Max. impervious surface 35% 35% * Measured from the lowest existing ground elevation prior to construction that is immediately adjacent to the structure to the highest point on any part of the structure, including rooftop equipment. (Top of pitched roof) AT 2 Burnsville Zoning R -1 Min. lot area 10,000 Min. side setback 10' (5' detached garage) 'Min. rear setback 30' (8' detached garage) Max. building hei ht* 30' FAR None Max. building coverage None Max. impervious surface None * Measured from the average elevation of the adjoining ground level to the top of a flat roof and the mean distance of the highest gable on a pitched roof. (Mid- point'of pitched roof) Eagan Zoning R -1 R -1 S Min. lot area 12,000 8,000 Min. side setback 10' (5' detached garage) 6' (5' detached garage) Min. rear setback 15' (5' detached arse 15' (5' detached arse Max. height* 35' 35' FAR None None Max. building covera e 20% 25% Max. impervious surface None None * Measured from the average elevation of the highest and lowest points within a five foot horizontal distance from the exterior building foundation to the highest point of a flat roof, or the average height of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof. (Mid -point of pitched roof, from average elevation.) Eden Prairie Zoning R1 -22 R1 -13.5 R1 -9.5- Min. lot area. 22,000. 13,500 9,500 Min. side setback 15' (10' detached . garage) 10' (10' detached garage) 5' (5' detached garage) Max. building height* 40' (10' detached garage) 40' (10' detached garage) 40' (5' detached garage) FAR None None None Max. building coverage None None None Max. Impervious surface None None None * Measured to the mid point of the highest pitch of the roof. Measurement is from the highest grade. If grade drops more than 10 feet, the measurement is taken from the lowest grade, and 10 feet is added to the 40 -foot requirement. (Mid -point of pitched roof) K_ 3 Edina Zoning R -1 Min. lot area 9,000 Min. side setback 10' (3' detached garage) 5' if lot is less than 75' wide Min. rear setback 25' 3' detached garage Max. building height* 30' FAR None Max. building coverage 25% 30% if lot is less than 9,000 square feet Max. Impervious surface None * Measured to the mid point of the highest pitch of the roof. Measurement is from the front or street elevation. Hopkins Zoning R -1 A R -1 B R -1 c Min. lot area 6,000 8,000 12,000 Min. side 1 story = 8 feet 1 story = 8 feet 1 story = 10 feet setback 2 story = 8 feet 2 story = 8 feet 2 story = 12 feet 30' 3 story = 10 feet 3 story = 10 feet 3 story = 14 feet Min. rear 25' 30' 35' setback FAR None None Max. building 35' 35' 35' hei ht* None None Max. impervious surface FAR None None None Max. building 35% 35% 35% coverage Max. None None None Impervious surface * Measured to the mid point of the highest pitch of the roof. Measurement is from the average front or street elevation. Lakeville Zoning RS -1 RS -2 RS -3 RS-4 Min. lot area 20,000 15,000 11,000 9,375 Min. side setback 15' 15' 10' 7' Min. rear setback 30' 30' 30' 30' Max. building height* 35' 35' 35' 25' FAR None None None None Max. building coverage None None None None Max. impervious surface None None None None * Measured from the mean ground level to the top of a flat roof, to the mean distance of the highest gable on a pitched or hip roof. (Mid -point of pitched roof) �D 4 Maple Grove Zoning R -1 R -2 R -2B Min. lot area 20,000 10,000 10,800 Min. side setback 5' 30' aggregate) 5' 15' aggregate) 5' 15' aggregate) Min. rear setback 30' 30' 30' Max. building hei ht* 35' 35' 35' FAR None None None Max. building coverage None None None Max. impervious' surface None None None * Measured from the mean ground level to the top of a flat roof, to the mean distance of the highest gable of a pitched or hip roof, to the deck line of a mansard roof, or to the uppermost point on all other roof types. (Mid -point of pitched roof, from average elevation.) Minnetonka Zoning R -1 Min. lot area 22,000 Min. side setback 15' (15' detached garage) Min. rear setback 40' (15' detached garage) Max. building height* 35' FAR None Max. building coverage None Max. Impervious surface None * Measured to the mid point of the highest pitch of the roof. Measurement is from the highest grade. If grade drops more than 10 feet, the measurement is taken from the lowest grade, and 10 feet is added to the 35 -foot requirement. (Mid -point of pitched roof.) New Brighton Zoning R -1 Min. lot area 10,000 Min. side setback 5' Min. rear setback 5' Max. building height* 30' FAR None Max. building coverage 30% Max. Impervious surface 50% * Measured from grade to the highest point of a flat roof, or to the average height of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof. (Mid -point of pitched roof.) Al Plymouth Zoning RSF -1 RSF -2 RSF -3 Min. lot area 18,500 12,500 7,000. Min. side setback 15' (6' detached garage) 10' (6' detached garage 8' (6' detached garage) Min. rear setback 25' (6' detached garage) 25' (6' detached garage) 25' (6' detached garage) Max. building height* 35' 35' 35' FAR None None None Max. building coverage .30% 30% 35% Max. impervious surface None None None * Measured from the average of the highest and lowest point of grade for that portion of the lot covered by the building to the highest point of a flat roof and the mean height between eaves and ridge for a gable, hip and gambrel roof. (Mid -point of pitched roof, from average elevation.) St. Louis Park Zoning R -1 R -2 Min. lot area 9,500 7,200 Min. side setback 9' one side and 6' 7' one side and 5' 10' (5' detached garage) on the other (2' on the other (2' Min. rear setback detached garage) detached garage) Min. rear setback 25' (2' detached 25' (6' detached 40' garage) garage) Max. building 30' 30' height* 30% 20% FAR None None Max. building 35% 35% coverage Max. impervious None None surface * Measured from the highest elevation between the building and the curb to mid point of a. pitched roof. Wayzata Zoning R -3A R -2A R -2 Min. lot area 9,000 25,000 15,000 Min. side setback 10' (5' detached garage) 15' (15' detached garage) 10' (5' detached garage) Min. rear setback 20' (5' detached garage) 20' (5' detached garage) 20' (5' detached garage) Max. building height` 30' 40' 30' FAR None None None Max. building coverage 30% 20% 20% Max. impervious surface None None None * Measured from the highest adjoining sidewalk or ground surface within a five foot distance from the exterior wall to the.highest point of a flat roof or the average height of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof. (Mid -point of pitched roof) Al 6 Woodbury Zoning R-4 Min. lot area 10,000 Min. side setback 10' (5' detached garage) Min. rear setback 25' (5' detached ara e Max. height 40' 3- stories FAR None Max. building coverage 35% Max. impervious surface None * Measured to the mid point of the highest pitch of the roof. Measurement is from the highest grade. If grade drops more than 10 feet, the measurement is taken from the lowest grade, and 10 feet is added to the 40 -foot requirement. (Mid -point of pitched roof.) AOk 7 City invites public input on'teardown' limits Page 1 of 2 Staffribune.Com i MINNEAPOLIS - ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA B3U1 Home News,,., Sports-./ Lifestyle -,, Entertainment\. - Opinion\/ Classifieds\/ Cars,;/ Homes\/ Jobsx Shopping\/ I Welcome I Log in I Member Center 1 q Search All GO Help Home I Local Top read stories Top ema City invites public input on 'teardown' limits The campaign to crack doNvn on "monster homes" in Minneapolis is moving from rhetoric to action. Last update: March 17, 2007 — 4:12 PM The campaign to crack down on "monster homes" in Minneapolis is moving from rhetoric to action. Monday evening will be a first chance for citizens to come to City Hall to hear about and react to a specific proposal to impose limits on the size of new homes. The issue has caused fierce anger in the southwest corner of the city, in particular -- and in some nearby suburbs, such as Edina and Minnetonka -- as smaller, older homes get bought up, knocked down and replaced with new ones much bigger than those around them. a Printer friendly p E -mail this story f Save to del.icio.us Related Content = What's Next Local DFL headquarters reports break -in Passport delays are derailing spring -break dreams Thousands of Minneapolis protesters march against Iraq war Region report: Competitors played role in DM &E loan's fate, Thune says Driver shot by trooper in Becker had history of drunken driving Under the proposal, Minneapolis would set a maximum floor area for new single - family homes and duplexes. For instance, on a 5,000 - square -foot lot, you could no longer build a home with more than 2,500 finished square feet. Additionally, the maximum footprint for buildings would shrink from 60 to 50 percent of a lot. And the maximum for all "hardcover" on the lot, including driveways, would fall from 75 to 65 percent. "There are some types of homes that have been built in the past that 4110 httn: / /www.starttibune.com/462 /story/1060989.html Driver shot by Passpc trooper in Becker derailir had history of break c drunken driving Does t Gophers hockey: An fight de old friend awaits There': Lucia in Denver old car Passport delays are Driver derailing spring- trooper break dreams history Sid Hartman: driving Wheeler looked like Superji Broten on winner for JFk Fire forces evacuation of townhomes in Eagan; no injuries were reported get your risk ft Hoods TRY IT Shopping -Classifieds Find jobs by keyword: GOB .............. 3/19/2007 City invites public input on 'teardown' limits couldn't be [built] any longer," said Molly McCartney, a city planner. The new rules would discourage suburban-style front - loaded garages, preferring detached ones on alleys. They'd also discourage builders from raising a home higher by bringing in fill or lifting a basement up to where more natural light flows in. "People are sandwiching new housing forms into traditional urban - type lots," McCartney said, and the new rules would respond to that trend. DAVID PETERSON Ad ,Links $50 in free clicks College Degree in 1 Year Earn AS, BS, or MS degree in 1 year. Financial Aid Options. Start Now! USADegreePrograms.com Cash Now for Your Annuity Sell your annuity to J.G. Wentworth and get the cash you need now. www.jgwfunding.com Motivated Professionals Work from home. Create time freedom& financial freedom. Serious only. www.2createwealth.net ITT Technical Institute Over 85 Locations & Online Programs Available. Request A Free Brochure www.itt- tech.edu - Get the Stan Tribune delivered to your home each day! Click here to suhscnba. Page 2 of 2 More Options C Career M Top Jobs Nurse - RN Park Nicollet Chemical Dependency Case Manager On Belay Theatre; Chanhassen Dinner Theatres; Les Miserables Chanhassen Dinner Theatre Sales Greenspring Media Group Nurse - Deputy Nurse Exec Veterans Administration Administrative - HR Administrative Assistant Pediatric Home Service ERP Developer Analyst Best Vendors Management Spring Plant Merchandiser Natural Beauty Growers +ti BANKING Transfer I United Bai Healthcar North Mer, Drafting: Designer Futurestar Accounia Kyle Hunt Construct Employm Opportun Allied Blac Delivery- Position Keystone. Ind Inc Bakery M Mason Br( Counselir Director Gustavus College Copyright 2007 Star Tribune. All rights reserved. Feedback I Terms of Use I Privacy Policy I Member Center I Company Site. I Star Tribune Company Store I Comp & Contacts I Company Jobs I Advertising Information I Newspaper Subscritions & Service. I eEdition I Classroom 425 Portland Av. S., Minneapolis, MN 55488 (612) 673 -4000 All http: / /www.startribune- com/462 /story /1060989.html 3/19/2007 ORDINANCE NO. 2006. AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING NEW PLAT FINDINGS, RESIDENTIAL LOT WIDTH STANDARDS, BUILDING HEIGHT STANDARDS AND RESIDENTIAL TREE PRESERVATION STANDARDS THEREBY. AMENDING CHAPTERS 16 AND 19 OF THE'CITY CODE The City Council of the City of Bloomington, Minnesota ordains: Section 1. That Chapter 16 of the City Code Is hereby amended by deleting those words that are contained In brackets [ I and adding those words that are underlined, to read as follows: CHAPTER 16 LAND DEVELOPMENT AND PLATTING ARTICLE 1. SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS SEC. 16.05-01. SUBDIVISION REVIEW PROCESS. Mf (e) (4) That the site is RGI physiGally suitable lathe proposed density 91 develeprApFitr (5) Thatthe design of the subdools-ion OF the lamposedimprwomeFAS aF9 likely (6) That the design 91 the e- -bdh - simian OF the typS G! ImpFavemeAls YAII be detFiFnental to- the ha-a#h-. i OF 06-A 021 AA 09 40 A preliminary or final plat must be denied if the Issuing Authority makes any of the following findings: (1) The plat is in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan: (2) The plat is In conflict with any applicable general or area plan: (3) The plat does not conform with City Code standards and other applicable laws and regulations: (4) The plat creates conflicts with existing easements: (5) There is inadequate public infrastructure (roads, unties, storm water system. emergency services, schools, etc.) to support the additional development potential created by the plat. (7) The plat will be detrimental to the public health, safety or general welfare. Page 1 h[9L Section 2. That Chapter 19 of the City Code Is hereby amended by deleting those words that are contained in brackets ] and adding those words that are underlined, to read as follows: M\ CHAPTER 18 ZONING ARTICLE I. GENERAL PROVISIONS Division B. Definitions SEC. 19.03. DEFINITIONS. The following words and terms when used in this Chapter shall have the following meanings unless the context clearly indicates otherwise: Callper - The diameter of a tree measured six inches above the ground for trees four Inches In diameter or less and measured twelve Inches above the ground for trees greater than four inches in diameter. M1 . Aid Lot width —. Fhe �QFI�?Rlal d-10-112-AGG W_ NAM 9 A th::A Side 10-t 11-A ft 09 2 lQt FA SaSUFOd W#hIR !he W bounds gee ARTICLE III. ZONING DISTRICT MAP, ZONING DISTRICTS AND DISTRICT USES •N ' SEC. 19.27.01. LARGE LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT RS-1. Mt (d) Dimensional Requirements — (1) Dimensional Requirements: Single Family Dwellings A Minimum lot area: 33,000 square feet B. Minimum lot width: 80 feet or as reauired in Section 19.42 (h), whichever is creator C. Minimum Setbacks: I. Front ii. Side: iii. Rear. Page 2 kt3 30 feet or as required in Section 19.42 (a), whichever is creator 10 feet 30 feet iv. Side or rear adjacent to street D. Maximum structure height Regulated pursuant to Section 19.47 of this Code. (2) Dimensional Requirements: Two -Family Dwellings A. Minimum lot area: B. Minimum lot width: C. Minimum setbacks: I. Front ii. Side: (1) One -story structure: (2) Two -story structure: (3) Attached garage: ill. Rear. Iv. Side or rear adjacent to street D. Maximum structure height: Regulated pursuant to Section 19.47 of thls Code. . (3) Setback Requirements: Private Garages. .AA Front B. Side: C. Rear. D. Side or rear adjacent to street (4) Dimensional Requirements: Non - Residential Uses.. A. Minimum lot width: B. Minimum setbacks: I. Front ii. Side: Ill. Rear. iv. Side or rear adjacent to street: C. Additional Setback: in no event shall any setback for a non- residential use in the RS-1 District be less than the height of the structure. D. Maximum Height Regulated pursuant to Section 19.47 of this Code. ARTICLE IV. DISTRICT REGULATIONS SEC. 19.41. MINIMUM DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS. (a) Single - family residences (1) Dimensional Requirements: 30 feet or as required in Section 19.42 (a). whichever Is greater 27,000 square feet 120 feet 30 feet or as required in Section 19.42 (a), whichever is greater 10 feet 15 feet 5 feet 30 feet 30 feet or as required in Section 19.42 (a), whichever is greater 30 feet or as required in Section. 19.42 (a). whichever is greater 5 feet 10 feet 30 feet or as required in Section 19.42 (a). whichever is greater DISTRICT R -1A R -1 Lot width, non -comer 100 feet or as required 80 feet or as required in lots = in Section 19.42 W. Section 19.42 (h). whichever Page 3 A(+ 100 feet 50 feet 25 feet 30 feet 50 feet Lot area Lot width, comer tots*" Floor area . Principal Structure Front -yard setback Side -yard setback Side'adjoining street Rear -yard setback Garagos• whichever is areater is areater 1 -1/2 acres- 11,000 sq. feet 120 feet 120 f 1,700 sq. feet 1,040 sq. feet 75 feet 30 feet or as required in Section 19.42 (a), whichever Is creator 30 feet 10 feet 75 feet 30 feet 75 feet 30 feet Front-yard setback 75 feet 30 feet or as required in Section 19.42 (a), whichever is greater Side -yard setback 5 feet' 5 feet" Side adjoining street 75 feet 30 feet Rear -yard setback 5 feet' 5 feet" *No portion of any principal structure attached to a garage shall be closer to any lot line than the minimum distance required for any principal structure in the zoning district. Any garage which is connected to sanitary sewer or water shall satisfy the setback requirements of the principal structure in the zoning district. **Where the height of a side wall exceeds nine (9) feet from the floor of the garage to the top of the side wall, the side and rear setbacks of the garage shall be increased a two feet for every foot, or portion thereof, of. height over nine (9) feet Single and two- family residential lots approved by the City after August 31. 2006 must meet minimum tot width requirements over the first 50 feet of the lot beyond the required front setback line. (2) Exceptions to Dimensional Requirements (A) Except where otherwise restricted by Section 19.42, the provisions of this Section may be modified and superseded under the procedure set forth in Section 19.62.01 only upon approval of a Conditional Use Permit for a Neighborhood Unit Development (b) Two-family and multiple- family residences - (3) Setbacks (A) Yards: Along public streets Fourplexes 40 feet Larger buildings 50 feet Other yards 30.feet The required setback shall be increased one foot for each foot of height of the structure over [ ) 30 feet in helaht as determined in Section 19.47 (b) (3). (B) Parking Lot Setbacks: From street 20 feet From interior property line 10 feet (C) Garages for two-family dwellings,in Single - Family (R -1, R -1A, RS-1) zoning districts shall satisfy the requirements for single -family dwellings in the zoning district. Garages for multiple - family dwellings may be placed not closer than five feet from a side or rear lot line, except where party walls are proposed. (4) Minimum Row House Unit or Lot Width. 16 feet Minimum Two - Family Lot Width. 100 feet or as required in Section 19.42 (h). whichever is greater (5) Except for garages, the side -yard setback shall in no event be less than five feet less than the height of the structure as determined In Section 19.47 (b) (3). Page 4 kl� SEC. 19.4L EXCEPTIONS AND ADDITIONS TO SETBACK AND LOT WIDTH REQUIREMENTS. (a) Where nearby structures in existence on October 7, 1974 have a greater front -yard setback than that required, the minimum front setback of a new structure shall conform to the prevailing setback in the Immediate. vicinity. The Issuing Authority shall determine the necessary front -yard setback in such cases; however, in no case shall the Issuing Authority require a setback greater than 65 feet except where an industrial district is adjacent to a residential district (1) wks mat are not single or!W04'amily residential lots• (2) lots within the proposed subdivision: (3) comer Ids: (4) flag lots: (5) lots approved through the Neighborhood Unit Development (NUD) process• (61 lots that are not within 500 feet of the proposed subdivision when measured or proposed public streets: and (7) for the purposes of calculating single family residential lot width two -family Ids are excluded. SEC. 19.47. HEIGHT. (a) Purpose - The purpose of Section 19.47 Is to regulate the height of structures in order to maintain the character and scale of the predominant single - family residential development in the City of Bloomington. (b) Definitions - (1) Protected residential property- any property within the City that meets all of the following requirements: (A) The property is zoned R -1, R -1 A, or RS-1 and the property may or may not also have a Planned Development (PD) Overlay classification; (B) The property is guided by the Comprehensive Plan for Low - Density Residential, Medium - Density Residential, or High - Density Residential; and (C) The property is used residentially or subdivided for residential use. (2) Designated residential property - any property within the City that meets all of the following requirements: (A) The property is zoned for residential use and the property may or may not also have a Planned Development (PD) Overlay classification; (B) The property is guided by the Comprehensive Plan for Low-Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, or High- Density Residential; and (C) The property is used residentially or subdivided for residential use. (3) StFuetuFe4 Page 5 A slope. (c) Height Limitations - (1) Buildings and Structures Other Than Towers (A) in all single - family residential zoning districts (R -1, R -1A, RS-1), (B) (i) buildings must not exceed two stories in heiaht (II) at the 5 foot side setback line building heiaht must not exceed 19 feet: (iv) beyond the 20 foot side setback line building height must not exceed 40 feet (y) flat roofed buildings must not exceed 30 tear in height at � point __ eke: Ia at any a..J11 I1 VII a OIIQ and (A) structures other than buildings must not exceed 30 feet in heiaht In all other zoning districts, the maximum height of any building or structure, excluding towers, shall be as follows: Distance of Building or Structure from the Property Lines of any Protected. Residential Property 0-30 feet 31-300 feet 3014800 feet over 600 feet Maximum Height 2 storles/30 ft. 3 stories /40 ft 80 ft. no limit (2) Towers. (A) In all designated residential property the maximum height of any tower, including all antennas and other attachments, shall be 30 feet; (B) In all residential zoning districts other than designated residential property, the maximum height of any tower, including all antennas and other attachments, shall not exceed one foot for each four feet the tower is setback from designated residential property up to a maximum height of 75 feet. (C) in all non - residential zoning districts, the maximum height of any tower, including all antennas and other attachments, shall not exceed one moot for each two. feet the tower is setback from designated residential property up to a maximum height of 75 feet in non - industrial zoning districts and 100 feet in Industrial zoning districts. Page 6 h(7 (3) In addition to the height limitations noted In 19.47(cx1) and (2), no new structure shag be constructed or established; no existing structure shall be altered, changed, rebuilt, repaired, or replaced; and no tree shag be allowed to grow or be altered, repaired or replaced, or replanted in anyway so as to project above any Airspace Surface as shown on MSP Zoning Map Airspace Zones -Plate A-19, A-20, A-21, A-22, A-25, A-26, A-27 and A -28 of the 2004 MSP Zoning Ordinance. (d) Applicability - (1) In all zoning districts, the maximum height of any structure, building, or portion thereof, other than towers, 600 feet or greater from any protected residential property shall not be governed by Section 19.47 of this Code. The height of antenna mounting structures In the public right -of -way shall be governed by Chapter 17, Article IV of the Code rather than by Section 19.47. (2) Exceptions - The requirements of Section 19.47 of this Code shall apply to all structures and developments otherwise permitted under this Code except (A) planned developments, when approved as part of a preliminary and final development plan pursuant to Section 19.38.01 of this Code. (B) public utility structures, Including but not limited to water towers, antennas, lights and signals, power and telephone poles, public safety radio towers, and poles supporting emergency warning devices. When a public utility structure Is extended or replaced to accommodate the colocation of a commercial wireless telecommunication service facility, such extension shall comply with the requirements of this Section. (C) church sanctuaries, steeples and bell towers. (D) multi -user towers may exceed the height limitations of Section 19.47 by up to 20 feet. (E) in accordance with the Federal Communications Commission's preemptive ruling PRB1, towers erected for the primary purpose of supporting amateur radio antennas may exceed 30 feet In height provided that a determination Is made by the Planning Manager that the proposed tower height is technically necessary to successfully engage in amateur radio communications. (F) Residential chimneys. up to 4 feet in width or depth may exceed the height limitations of Section 19.47 by uo to 2 feed (e) Noncompliance - Noncompliance of characteristics of structures and site development created by the application of Section 19.47 of this Code shall not in any manner limit the legal use of the property, nor in any manner limit the repair, maintenance, or reconstruction of a noncomplying characteristic or feature; however, in no Instance shall the degree of noncompliance be increased except as otherwise permitted by this Code. Page 7 4N r- -- r -r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ` e-0 i'�'i' 'i" I . , feet 1 1 1 1 ARTICLE V. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Nf SEC. 19.53. [RE66W E9.1 TREE PRESERVATION. 1) prevention of soil erosion and sedimentation: (2) improved air quality: (3) reduced noise pollution: (4) energy conservation through vrindbreaks and shading* (5) , control of the urban heat island effect: (6) increased property values: Page 8 /1,u ' 1 a 1 1 24 feet -------- - - * - -- -- 1 1 1 1 > Dwelling ; 1 .. ' 19 4 J feet 1 K 1 N ; 1 Side lot -► ♦ s +: ;E- Side -yeM Oro line Teat 1 setback 1 (� ---10 feet -+I i 1 . 20 feet --i►i ARTICLE V. PERFORMANCE STANDARDS Nf SEC. 19.53. [RE66W E9.1 TREE PRESERVATION. 1) prevention of soil erosion and sedimentation: (2) improved air quality: (3) reduced noise pollution: (4) energy conservation through vrindbreaks and shading* (5) , control of the urban heat island effect: (6) increased property values: Page 8 /1,u (7) protection of privacy by maintaining and establishing buffers between conflidiria land uses@ (8) enhanced aesthetics: and (9) providing habitat for wildlife. am end it, Thedia eter ate Disturbance Zones - That part of a site disturbed by tree clearing. grading, t enchina or any other construction activities. Healthy - �nv Slaniftant Tree except Ise 1. by certMed lbrester. • ' 1 7 or 11 City Forester, . 1 - I I :�• 11.1 • - • 1 _ • • • • 1 : ,l • 1 !' 1 d' (A) trees within existino or proposed conservation and protective easements: (B) trees within 100 Year floodplains: (C) trees within. wetlands: (D)_ trees on slopes greater than 2596: and (E) trees deemed diseased by a certified forester (e) Reforestatlon Reculrement (f) Tree Preservatlon Standards To receive credit for preserving existing Significant Trees Significant Trees must be protected from direct and indirect root damage and trunk and crown disturbance The following preservation standards apply: (2) There shall be no changes to the grade within the Critical Root Zone of any Significant Tree to be preserved. Page 9 04Z �r-Y M 06ed M pad jusid 41 'B NuoplS seinlefg elosauullry Aq papaluoo pus pauyap se Moop Aiesinu pey1liao wou eq lsnw pa4uelavq 1 swell 8 saaJl DuRsIxO wou Pus J0410ue euo wou Was 1901 049VU Jo wnwlulw I 1141q54 G! pal )Q9 919554 InoiepGoo joi 9211 '9940ul M1180 jley QuO PUB ON4 9! sea o ploep of 9219 polueld aq pntu oupueld wn seajl 41 lulw 94.L TLI (93 t 9 'seta s le;uewewo;o a4 Aetu 95450! 9531 poilnoei 914jo jusojea s 096#9 U841 OJOW ON W ,poluela eq o1 9ea4 Ile Jo 140154 jo lapul jeallio pus uoWq eta epolpul u 9Q.1 L lquatuailmej UOIWWJOIGJ Pow of powaoia wail jo wilsool 041 AMWGPI Wnw suel (OW suoistiewip pus uopwl 041 NPOPI WNW SUBld 9 U1 44m ne9 Oq 01 seeil lu UVIS AUS jo 9UOZ POld I80IWO 041 10 UOPOOJ Gt4 AMWOPI lsnw GuBld !AN a JOHLU19 Pus E)UNOU9.4 txJIPBJt) uue o jo 98QJe AMWqpl pnw pus eI GLA uo DuIP849 PGJOIOD ABJV Jo lyo Ja Aq seuoZ aoueqJ (l POSMOM &WOpi IAHLU micid b P £9 6L uolpaS u! pessnDqp so Golpinallo an ul patunoo lou aJ 8 •Paqj Ipun e: peAA9M popinoic aq a ivy il oixoWou oWpaoxiae us Alme le W f 8 9 L iwv uoa#49q 9 la Smumo 9 l • � !u n - 1 �-i•1'. 5711 -. li•. 4 ti - = 1 T ill u"I'l f L-1 1 j _ - 'L=-- 1 1 Page 11 A.I& N1 i Passed and adopted this day of , 2006. Mayor ATTEST: Secretary to the Council .APPROVED: City Attomey Page 12 4a3 NATIONAL EXAMPLES OF FLOOR AREA RATIOS �a� 9 City of Austin - List Subscription - - -- AUST N GTYCONNECTIgN- DevnGlopint.11.1 Be gins -1is, i. Fndl Options Select a service Select a map Directory I Departments I Ltnk� I Site Map I Helo I ContacLUs j amp �`•_ ,} :: Home :: Task Force :: Frequently Asked Questions :: FAR Calculator Interim Single - Family Development Regulations: (FAR) Calculator Page 1 of 2 The interim development regulations approved by the City Council on February 9, 2006 do not prohibit new single - family home construction or remodels.. People wishing to build a duplex of home or add on to a duplex or home may still do so under the temporary regulations adopted by the Council. The regulations limit the size of some new duplexes and single - family homes and remodels. The interim regulations are also limited to areas of the City where a shortage of drainage facilities exists. I need to know how much I can build according to the floor - area -ratio (FAR) limit. How do 1 find out? The FAR limit is easy to calculate. Simply multiply your total property size by 0.4, or use our online FAR calculator below. To see what the maximum total living area in square feet you could build on your property, enter the approximate square footage of your property and click "Calculate FAR ". Total property Area in Square Feet: Calculate FAR What are the restrictions? What can I build? New duplexes and homes: If you are building a new duplex or single - family home on a property where a duplex or house was or will be demolished or moved, the maximum size of the new home is limited to the greater of the following • 0.4 to 1 floor -to -area ratio (FAR); 2,500 square feet; or 20 percent more square feet than the home that was moved or will be moved. Additions: If you are adding on to a duplex or single - family structure, the maximum size of the structure after the remodel is limited to the greater of the following • 0.4 to 1 floor -to -area ratio (FAR); • 2.500 square feet; or ' . the existing size plus 1000 square feet, if the property carries a homestead exemption for property tax purposes i,u_.:,; t. :. •s - ; -it .Ofiir, al v/eh site of the City of Austin P;:g( �:n �4airs, Contact Us: webapp @ci:aust...... Ix.us I Pr; incy StMen-,ent - ti: �; n Acs: , Tex,-,s. All Rights Reserved. kaJ i .. . II_____.. -_ .. -*:.. ♦.. rfm 6/1/2006 City of San Jose Planning Divisions Single Family House Permit SAN JOSE City Homo t ty S -r%, About San Jose Visitors Thur 1'141r111ir1ti, Builc�in�; & Code Enforcement J, .Planning Divisions QSingle- Family House Permit .padMgnJ0yeryiew Page 1 of 3 Feedback S General PubWnformation . This site is intended to. provide information and help clarify the Single - Family House Permit Hearinas and Meetings Ordinance related to the rebuilding and remodeling of single - family homes in the City of San Jose. c�lendar of Events - renera Phan What is a Single- Family House Permit? Zonlns ---a and 519a On January 11, 2000, the City Council adopted an urgency ordinance amending the Drdinancg Zoning Code to include discretionary review of single - family houses. A new permit, Single - Family House Permit, may now be required for new construction or the remodel of a DeveloomenL l3eYieyv single - family house in certain instances. Hlstorlc Preservation When is a Single - Family House Permit required? Environmental .8eview S1rona_N_eiahb9&oods A Single - Family House Permit would be required if the house exceeds 30 feet or 2 stories . Initiative in height, if the floor area ratio (F.A.R.) (see 'What is a F.A.R.T) of the house exceeds .45, mwater ManaaemeRt or if the house or site is a designated City Landmark, listed on the City's Historic Stor Resources Inventory, or is in a Historic District or.Historic Conservation Area. If no Single- Family House Permit is required, you may proceed to the Building Division for building permits. Sma Growth i What process is involved with a Single - Family House Permit? °v ote MW_th � Man A Single - Family House Permit is obtained from the Department of Planning, Building, and Evergreen East Hills Vision Code Enforcement (Room 400 of City Hall, 801 N. First St.) This permit may go through Strategy one of three levels of approval involving either the Director of Planning or the City Council depending on the size and scope of work involved. The permit can be approved by the San Jose Mgg AL�e-nter Director of Planning at an administrative level or through a public hearing, or. by the City Council which involves a public hearing before both the Planning Commission and the City Vision hojV S - an _1 gse Council. Links S�glr gX SingJgFamile3i G i eiines (PDF) 2,424 k ® have been developed for use by i-,imeowners, builders, architects, and others designers to address issues specifically related to neighborhood character and compatibility. These guidelines are available for . G SstQ Index urchase at the Department of Planning, Building, and Code Enforcement. Accessibility Instructions p Problems viewing site How can 1 determine if my project needs a Single - Family House Permit? Answer the questions below to determine whether you need to obtain a Single - Family House Permit. Permit Determination Questions ArU 6/1/2006 City of San Jose Planning Divisions Single Family House Permit Page 2 of 3 1. Is the new house or addition greater than 30 feet in height? If yes, you need a Single - Family House Permit approved by the City Council. 2. Is the new house or addition greater than 2 stories? If yes, you need a Single - Family House Permit approved by the City Council 3. Is the floor area ratio of your house greater than .45 but equal to or less than .65? If yes, you need a Single - Family House Permit approved by the Director of Planning. 4. Is the F.A.R. of the house greater than .65? If yes. you need a Single - Family House Permit approved by the City Council. 5. Is your house or site a designated City Landmark, listed on the Historic Resources Inventory, or located in a Historic District or Historic Conservation Area? If yes, you need a Single- family. House Permit. If you answered 'no' to all of the questions above, a single - family house permit is not required for your house. You may proceed to the Building Division for building permits. Is a Special Use Permit still required to demolish a single - family house? A Special Use Permit is only required if you do not have an approved Single - Family House Permit or you have obtained building permits for a replacement house. How can 1 determine if a public hearing is involved with the review of my Single - Family House Permit? If the checklist above indicates the need for a Single - Family House Permit approved by City Council, there.will be a public hearing for your permit before the Planning Commission and the City Council. If no Council approval is indicated, the Director of Planning is the decision making body. To determine the process involved with a Directors decision, use the criteria listed below. Criteria for Administrative Review by the Director of Planning The issuance of building permits: • will not require removal of more than 50% of the exterior walls; • are for a house not to exceed 30 feet in height and two (2) stories; • are for a single -story addition; • are for a second -story addition where the total second -story floor area does not exceed 60% of the total first floor area (including attached garage floor area), and the addition is setback an additional 10 feet from the required front setback; • will not result in the enclosure or net loss of 10% or more of an existing front porch area; • are for an attached garage only if there is an existing attached garage on either side of the subject lot; _ • that require the roofline, materials, trim and decoration details of the new construction to be the same as that on- the-existing - house- ka7 6/1/2006 City of San Jose Planning Divisions Single Family House Permit Page 3 of 3 If all of the above criteria are met, no public hearing is involved with the review of a S ngle- Family House Permit. What is a floor area ratio (F.A.R.)? The floor area ratio is defined as the aggregate sum of all the floors in a house in relation to the lot area. Please see the question and response below regarding how the F.A.R. is calculated. How do I calculate my floor area ratio (F.A.R.)? The F.A.R. includes the sum of all the floors in a main structure measured to the outside surface of the exterior walls, including stairwells at all floors, and all areas that are greater than 50% enclosed with walls and covered. It does not include garage square footage (attached or detached), square footage of accessory structures on the lot, or square footage of basements. Last Mc.! :r,, r1 Date: 10/14/2005 City. Home - City Services - About San Josh - Visitors - Feedback - Search As a customer - driven organization, the City of San Jos& welcomes any suggestions you might have to help us serve you better. kat rnnincpnn am, /nlanninu /riev review /sfhU.aw 6/1/2006 FJ Report 02 -0683 CITY OF SUNNYVALE REPORT Planning Commission November 11, 2002 Page 1 of 8 SUBJECT: 2002 -0683 Application for related proposals on a 5,040 square . foot site located at 869 San Pablo Avenue in an R -0 (Low Density Residential) Zoning District (APN: 205 -04 -039); Motion Design Review to allow a one -story addition to an existing two - story house for a total of 2,914 square feet and a floor area ratio of 57.8% where 45% maximum is, allowed without Planning Commission Review. Motion Variance from SMC (Sunnyvale Municipal Code) section 19.32.020 to allow 48% lot coverage ,where 40% maximum is required. REPORT IN BRIEF Existing Site Conditions Two -story single family house Surrounding Land Uses North Single family homes South Single family homes. East Single family homes West Single family homes Issues Lot coverage Environmental Status Staff Recommendation Floor area ratio Scale and bulk compatibility with surrounding. homes A Class 1 Categorical Exemption relieves this project from California Environmental Quality Act provisions and City Guidelines. Deny the Variance and the Design Review AM 6/1/2006 Page 2 of 8 Report 02 -0683 PROJECT DATA TABLE *Items that do not meet the Zoning Code. ANALYSIS Back sound Previous Actions on the Site: There are no add la first-story ry famfamily roomy subject site. In 1975 a building permit was issued t bathroom and a second -story master bedroom. , Description of Proposed Project The applicant is proposing to add 277 square feet to the first floor of an existing two - story house. Of this total, 170 square feet would be devoted to a third full bathroom in in the rear of the house. The remaining 107 square de feet would the house. allow proposed ght the width of two bedrooms on the east (right) her than the of the bathroom addition is 15' -4 ", which is approximately creased height to a more existing first story. The applicant is proposing this increased symmetrical appearance with the existing second story, which is 20 1" in height. The setback of the addition from the front wall oft second s rY would Environmental Review A 30 ..._.,,__._._ ......... .... M1.„ Ii ,,,.�nmi�•,�!nni- rc /(17- (1f,RI htm 6/1/2006 Low Density Same - -- neral Plan Residential ning District R -0 Same - -- 6,000 min. t Size (s.f•) 5,040 Same. oss Floor Area (s.f.) 2,637 2,914 --- it Coverage ( %)* ° 42.5% 48.0% 40% max. oor Area Ratio (FAR) 52.3% 57.8% -' gilding Height (ft.) 20' -1" Same 30' max. 2 Same 2 max. o. of Stories (facing prop.) etbacks- 20' 20''� 20' min. • Front 5' -8" 5-1-81' 4' min. • Left Side 10' -4" 6,_4„ 4' min. . Right Side 20' 10' 10' min. . Rear parking 5 Same 2 covered, 2 uncovered dotal No. of Spaces min. go. of Covered Spaces 2 Same 2 min. 10' min. nrivewav Aisle Width (ft.) 15' Same *Items that do not meet the Zoning Code. ANALYSIS Back sound Previous Actions on the Site: There are no add la first-story ry famfamily roomy subject site. In 1975 a building permit was issued t bathroom and a second -story master bedroom. , Description of Proposed Project The applicant is proposing to add 277 square feet to the first floor of an existing two - story house. Of this total, 170 square feet would be devoted to a third full bathroom in in the rear of the house. The remaining 107 square de feet would the house. allow proposed ght the width of two bedrooms on the east (right) her than the of the bathroom addition is 15' -4 ", which is approximately creased height to a more existing first story. The applicant is proposing this increased symmetrical appearance with the existing second story, which is 20 1" in height. The setback of the addition from the front wall oft second s rY would Environmental Review A 30 ..._.,,__._._ ......... .... M1.„ Ii ,,,.�nmi�•,�!nni- rc /(17- (1f,RI htm 6/1/2006 Report 02 -0683 Page 3 of 8 A Class 1 Categorical Exemption. relieves this project from California Environmental Quality Act provisions and City Guidelines. Class 1 Categorical Exemptions include minor additions to existing facilities. Variance i_ a_ name Use: The existing home has a master bedroom on the second floor and three bedrooms and 11 /2 bathrooms on the first floor. The applicant wishes to add a full bathroom on the first floor to accommodate a disabled family member. Two of the bedrooms are being expanded for the same purpose. Site Layout: The home is located on a standard rectangular 5,040 square foot lot. The existing size of the first story is 2,144 square feet, which yields lot coverage of 42.5 %; 2.5% higher than ' the maximum allowed in the R -O Zoning District. Staff has determined that the existing lot coverage is legal non- conforming. The second story, which is 493 square feet, is located on the left side of the home. The existing floor area ratio. is 52.3 %. As proposed, lot coverage would increase to 48 %. Lot coverage for surrounding homes on San Pablo Avenue ranges from 26% to 41 %. Staff is concerned about the increase in lot coverage although a usable, rear yard area of approximately 20' X 30' will remain. Floor Area Ratio will increase to 57.8 %. The three bedrooms on the first floor are located in the rear right side of the house. The current right side yard setback is 10' -4 "; it will be reduced to 6' -4" with the expansion of the bedrooms. The additional first floor bathroom would be located, behind the bedrooms in the rear of the house. The setback from the front wall of the second story and ,the bathroom addition would be � 30'. The rear yard currently has. a 20' setback, which would be reduced to 10' with the addition. Although the bathroom addition would consume less than 25% of the required rear yard area, the increased first -story height (15' -4 ") begins to .approach building single-family - family res den al development second-story ndards do not into the rear yard g allow second -story additions to encroach into the required rear yard. area; a minimum 20' must be maintained. A typical second -story building would be approximately 20 to 22 feet in height; the existing two -story structure is 20' 1" in height. The following. Guidelines were considered in analysis of the project site design. Design Policy or Guideline (Site Layout) Comments Citywide Design Guidelines Site Desigr N proposed addition meets all required Setting A1. td tbacks and will incorporate materials colors to match the existing 431 6/1/2006 Report U2-Ub2SS New projects shall be compatible with the surrounding development in intensit setbacks, building forms, material, color ar landscaping. Architecture: rage 4 of s cture. However,.the bulk of the home the unusual height of the rear yard tion is not as compatible with ounding homes as other design I -oaches may be. The existing house has a composition shingle roof, off -white stucco walls and blue wood siding at the gable of the second -story roof. The roof, exterior materials and colors of the addition would match the existing house. The applicant is proposing a height of 15' -4" with a gable roof for the bathroom addition in the right rear of the house to create a more balanced appearance with the second story on. the left side of the house. However, the addition would be setback 30' from. the front wall of the second story, which is an unusual design that may appear incongruent with the existing house. Staff is concerned with the architectural design approach which results in tall, disconnected wall planes viewed from the rear and left side elevation. Staff has discussed alternative design strategies with the applicant .including .consideration of an expansion of the second story rather than a first -story encroachment into the rear yard. All new windows would have white vinyl trim. The design of the bathroom addition includes seven new windows as follows: two arched windows located on the front and rear elevations; and five rectangular windows with grids located on the left and rer elevations. Two sliding -glass rectangular windows are proposed. for the new wall the expanded bedrooms on the right elevation. The applicant plans to upgrade all existing windows to match these. The arched window proposed for the front elevation . of the bathroom addition will not match the rectangular window on the front elevation of the second story. If the proposed design is approved, staff recommends Condition of Approval #6 requiring that the proposed plans be modified to remove the existing second -story rectangular window and add an arched window to match the addition. The following Guidelines were considered in the analysis of the project architecture. Design Policy or Guideline Comments (Architecture) Citywide Design Guidelines Scale and Character B11. Maintain the scale and character of the existing main structure in building additions by retaining similar proportions and rhythm present on the main structures. Design Material and Color F8. The location and height of the proposed first story addition will alter the rhythm of the existing structure and will appear out of scale with the existing rear. elevation. A3a materials and colors of the proposed httn- //.>>nnvvale.ca.eov /nc2002 /reports /02- 0683.htm 6/1/2006 Report 02 -0683 Page 5 of 8 Coordinate color and material of building addition would match the existing.house. additions with those of the principal ctr,.cture. Landscaping: Landscaping on the subject property is typical of single family neighborhoods. The proposed addition would not impact existing landscaping. Parking/ Circulation; The existing site has sufficient parking; there is a two -car garage and three uncovered spaces. The proposed addition would not affect available parking. Compliance with Development Standards With the exception of lot coverage, the proposed addition meets all residential development standards. Expected Impact on the Surroundings The proposed project will add bulk and mass to an existing residential structure. The design and bulk of the home, with the addition, may not -be compatible with surrounding homes. Although second -story additions typically have more height and bulk than that proposed, the unusual height of the proposed addition would appear to have similar impact than that of a second -story. With the encroachment of the addition into the rear yard, this may be of particular concern to adjacent neighbors to the right and rear of the property. Of 19 lots located between Ahwanee Avenue and Alvarado Avenue on San Pablo Avenue, there are two, two -story homes, including the subject home. With the exception of the two corner lots on Ahwanee Avenue and San Pablo Avenue, the sizes of these lots range from approximately, 5,100 square feet to 5,600 square feet. The percentage of lot coverage on two of these lots, including the subject lot, exceeds 40% (41% and 42.5 %)'. The remaining lots have coverage ranging from 26% to 38 %. With the proposed addition, the coverage of subject lot would be 48 %. Staff Discussion Staff recommends that the applicant consider expanding the second .story of the house rather than increasing the lot coverage in the rear of the first floor. To meet the intended purpose of the addition with a second -story expansion, one possible solution could include expansion of the existing full bathroom on the first floor. into one of the existing bedrooms, and the addition of a bedroom on the second floor. Although there are few two -story homes in the neighborhood, this design would appear more symmetrical and balanced than the proposed 15' -4" high addition that is setback 30' from the second story. The floor area ratio with a second -story expansion would still exceed 45 %,. but there would be no increase to the existing lot coverage. These changes would require a new Design. Review application and review at a Planning Commission hearing. 433 6/1/2006 Report 02 -0683 Page 6 of 8 Findings, General Plan Goals and Conditions of Approval Staff is recommending denial for this Variance and the a Design Review because th. Findings (Attachment 1) were not made. However, i h Commission is able to make the required Findings, Staff is recommending the Conditions of Approval in Attachment 2. • Findings and General Plan Goals are located in Attachment 1. • Conditions of Approval are located in Attachment 2. Fiscal Impact No fiscal impacts other than normal fees and taxes are expected. Public Contact Notice of Public Hearing Staff Report Agenna • published in the Sun Posted on the City of • Posted on the City's newspaper Sunnyvale's Website official notice • Posted on the site bulletin board • Mailed to. the adjacent Provided at the City of Sunnyvale's property owners of the Reference Section of the Website project site City of Sunnyvale's Public Library No public correspondences have City Hall to review the plans addition. Alternatives been received for this project. One neighbor visited and expressed concern regarding the size of the 1. Deny the Variance and the Design Review. Direct staff to work with the applicant on a revised design. 2. Approve the Variance and the Design Review with the Conditions of Approval found in Attachment 2. 3. Approve the Variance and the Design Review with modified Conditions of Approval. Recommendation Alternative 1. Prepared by: Christine Cannizzo Project Planner W 6/1/2006 Report 02 -0683 Reviewed by: Fred Bell Principal Planner Reviewed by: Trudi Ryan Planning Officer Attachments: 1. Findings 2. CDnditions of Approval 3. Sit- Plans 4. Site_pho.togra phs 5. V/�riance Justific%itio -Ds Findings - Variance Page 7 of 8 1. Because of exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applicable to the property, or use, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, the strict application of the ordinance would not deprive the property owner of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the vicinity and within the same zoning district. The size of the subject lot is smaller than the required standard of 6,000 square feet in R -0 Zoning Districts, however, it is the standard size of the lots in the neighborhood (excluding the corner lots). The subject lot has a standard rectangular shape. Given these conditions, the property owner would not be deprived of privileges enjoyed by other properties in the neighborhood. 2. The granting of the Variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property, improvements or uses within the immediate vicinity and within the same zoning district. if the Variance is granted, the proposed addition will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the property or its surroundings. 3. Upon granting of the Variance, the intent and purpose of the ordinance will not be served and the recipient of the Variance will be granted special privileges not enjoyed by other surrounding property owners within the same zoning district . if the Variance were granted, the applicant would be allowed a lot coverage of 48 %. Given that the majority of surrounding properties have lot coverage ranging from 26% to 38 %, a precedent may be established allowing greater than 40% lot coverage in the neighborhood. A35' 6/1;2006 Report U2-WSs Findings - Design Review r agr. o va o 1. The proposed project design and architecture does not conform with the requirements of the "Citywide Design Guidelines ", specifically Building Design Scale and Character item B 11 "Maintain the scale and character of the existing main structure in building additions by retaining similar proportions, and rhythm present on the main structures ". The location and height of the proposed first story .addition will alter the rhythm of the existing structure and will appear out of scale with the existing rear elevation Back to Att-achrnetirs Conditions of Approval In addition to complying with all applicable City, County, State and Federal Statutes, Codes, Ordinances and Resolutions, the Permittee . expressly accepts and agrees to comply with the following Conditions of Approval. 1. This approval is for a Variance to allow lot coverage of 48% where 40% maximum is permitted per SMC Section 19.32.020, and for Design Review of an addition to an existing one -story home resulting in a floor area ratio of 58 %. 2. The two -year expiration date of the Variance shall be measured from the date of the approval by the final review authority at a public hearing if the approval is not exercised. 3. The one -year expiration date of the Design Review shall be measured from the date of the approval by the final review authority at a public hearing if the approval is not exercised. 4. The Variance and approved Design Review shall be valid only in conjunction with detailed plans as submitted or as may be modified by the. reviewing authority of the City during a public hearing. Minor changes of the approved plans may be approved administratively by the Director of Community Development. 5. Roof materials and exterior materials and colors of the addition shall match the existing house. This shall be noted on plans submitted for the building permit. 6. The existing second story shall be modified to add an arched window that matches the arched window on the front elevation of the bathroom addition. 7. One street tree shall be planted in the parkway strip. 8. The developer/ applicant shall obtain a building permit. 9. The applicant/ property owner shall reproduce the Conditions of Approval on the Title Page of the plans submitted for a building permit for this project. Back_.to Attachineri c,. Return to 11 a l l/ 1 i /.02 A3� http: / /sunnyvale.ca.gov /pc2002 /reports /02- 0683.htm 6/1/2006 Atlanta Zoning j Dekalb Zoning I Cobb Zoning I Fulton County Zoning California Land Auc tion Land for Sale Name your pricel 250 parcels. Search 1000s of land for sale Easy Financing, No Credit Check _listings across the country. ��� ��• �000000ale central.cam nin atla On a g Fulton County Zning Codes Z nn Free Zoning info from the Law Encyclopedial k Page 1 of 1 j government auction buy government land dr qualifying financing avail an anirars Table of Zoning District Min. Lot Area inimu Front Setbadt 1/2 ­ Depth Front id ea Min Parking spaces Max Floor, Area ratio Max Lot Coverage R -1 2 acres 60 - 30 25 35 2 .25 25% �IIt01N R -Z R -2a R -3 R -3a R -4 !70 R -4a 1 acre 30,000 s.f 18,000 s.f 13,500 s.f 9 000 s. 7, 500 s. 60 60 50 50 35 30 30 30 25 25 17.5 - rj 15 15 10 10 7 7 30 30 20 15 15 15 2 2 2 2 1 1 .30 .35 .40 .45 .50 n/a 35%. 35% 40% 45% 50% 50% A' C R -4b r-w--S-T 60 2,800 s.f 7,500 s. 20 30 10 15 5 7 5 7 1 se07 010 n/a _ s07.007(5 n/a 50°Yb 6.1 R -1 Single Family Dwelling District. Resoun n are the R -1 District 6.1.1 R -1 District scope and intent. Regulations set forth in this sectio regulations. Article XIX should be consulted to determine uses and minimum standards for uses allowed by administrative s F r or use permit. The R -1 District encompasses lands devoted to residential. areas and closely related uses. Fin guve1 ins (Amended 4/7/93) Mo 9�1� Selling 6.1.2 Use regulations. Within the R -1 District, land and structures shall be used in accordance with standards Moving herein. Any use not specifically designated as permitted shall be prohibited. Real E Land A. Permitted uses. Structures and land may be used for only the following purposes: ShopMao Sc Dols Tran p9! 1. Single family dwelling. V ndo im Link Ex t 2. Agriculture, general and specialized farming, initiated prior to March 7, 1990, including: horticulture, plant Abou nursery, dairy farming, truck gardening and poultry raising provided, however, that agricultural buildings I. an Marr must be at least 200 feet from all side and rear property lines, and that no products shall be offered for sale Ce _eQ on land so utilized. B. Accessory uses. A building or lot may be used for uses customarily incidental to any permitted use and a dwelling may be used for a home occupation. 6.1.3 Development standards. A. Height regulations: No building shall exceed 40 feet in height. (Amended 2/7/96) X3`7 http:// www. atlantazoningcentral .com/fulton.county.zoning.html Atlanta om Land FO r Ful o C- Dekal 6/1/2006 Section 12.96.060 R -1 and R -1 -D single - family residential districts. Pagel of 4 Cha ter 12.96 ESTABLISHMENT —AND DESCRIPTION OF DISTRICTS Ch p --- -- Section 12.96.060 R -1 and R -1 -1) single - family residential districts. To encourage the development of low density residential uses. es This type es of such as schools, A. purpose. permit associated with single - family structures. However, uses related d single aria y churches, and child care .centers may be permitted in en of clot Red D usi gC open space, and other amenities it permit under Chapter 12.116. Innovation in development which make for a more desirable living environment. B. permitted Uses. The following uses are permitted in the R -1 and R -1 -D districts: I. Single - family dwellings; 2, Accessory buildings and uses; 3. Small family day care homes; 4. Special residential care facilities. C. Conditional Uses. Conditional uses allowed in the R -1 and R -1 -D districts, subject to obtaining a use permit, are as follows: 1. Churches and schools; 2. Parks and playgrounds; 3. Landscaped public or private parking lots when adjacent to any C district; 4. Mobile home parks; 5. Crop and tree farming; 6, Large family day care homes, subject to the provisions set forth in Section 12.84X00 . D. Development Regulations. Development feet regulations iots; six he R-1 and square feet, comer lots. Minimum site area: Five thousand squat t, Minimum lot width: Fifty feet, except sixty feet o ercent; structures: Varies, lot coverage of structures in the Maximum coverage: Impervious surface: Eighty p 1 and R -1 -D residential districts shall not exceed eighty percent of the total floor area allowed by this section. Maximum floor area: The permitted Floor Area (FA) of buildings shall be determined by multiplying the j 1, below) by the Floor Area Ratio corresponding to the slope of the lot (from Chart Adjusted Lot Size (from Chart 2, below). Average Percent Slope of Site: The Average Percent Slope of site is computed by the following formula: AS (Average Percent = p100 x I x L Slope of Site) where I = contour interval in feet, not to exceed ten (10) feet L = summation of length of contour lines in feet; and A = area in square feet of parcel being considered. AS = average percent slope of site. F.as loor Area Ratio Adjustment Factor for Lot Size. The Floor Area shall er adjusted by inversely prop average slope he lot size as shown in the Chart 1, below. The Floor Area Ratio sha ] hown in Chart 2, below. Chart 1 ADJUSTED LOT SIZE Lot Adjustment Size Factor g (sq. ft.) ...,ur,,,., ,.o crnv/( erk /Sari Bruno Municipal _Code /Title_12 /96/060.htm1 6/1/2006 Section 12.96.060 R -1 and R -1 -D single - family residential districts. Page 2 of 4 2,500 1.20 3,000 1.16 3,500 1.12 4,000 1.08 4,500 1.04 5,000 1.00 5,500 0.97 6,000 0.94 6,500 0.91 7,000 0.88 7,500 0.85 8,000 0.82 8,500 0.79 9,000 0.77 9,500 0.75 10,000 0.73 10,500 0.71 11,000 0.68 11,500 0.66 12,000 0.64 12,500 0.62 13,000 0.61 13,500 0.60 14,000 0.59 14,500 0.58 15,000 0.57 15,500 0.56 16,000 0.55 16,500 0.54 17,000 0.53 17,500 0.52 18,000 0.51 18,500 0.50 19,000 0.49 19,500 0.48 20,000 0.47 >210,000 0.47 Chart 2 PERMITTED FLOOR AREA Average Floor Slope Area Ratio (percent) (FAR) <10 0.550 10 0.550 11 0.545 12 0.541 13 0.537 14 0.533 15 0.529 16 0.524 17 0.519 03 ra anv /clerk/San Bruno Municipal Code/Title_12 /96 /060.htm1 6/1/2006 Section 12.96.060 R -1 and R -1 -D single - family residential districts. Page 3 of 4 .o v l8 0.514' 19 0.509 20 0.505 21 0.500 22 0.495 23 0.490 24 0.485 25 0.480 26 0.475 27 0.470 28 0.465 29 0.460 30 0.456 31 0.451 32 0.446 33 0.441 34 0.436 35 0.432 36 0.427 37 0.422 38 0.417 39 0.412 40 0.407 41 0.402 42 0.397 43 0.392 44 0.387 45 0.383 >45 0.383 A conditional use permit shall be required whenever the permitted limitations for lot coverage or floor area are exceeded. Minimum front yard: Fifteen feet* Minirnum side yard: Five feet* Minimum rear y Other Regulations: 1. Maximum height of structures shall vers e slope of less conditional twenty use percent permit hich slope from front a. Twenty-eight feet for lots with g line to rear property line, as well as for lots which slope from side yard to side yard regardless of e property ercent or more; average slope; or b. Twenty-six feet for downsloping lots (from front to rear) with an average slope of twenty p or percent or more. c. Thirty feet for upsloping lots (from front to rear) with an average slope of twenty p 2. In the case of conditional uses, additional regulations may be required. uld result in an increase in the gross 3. Additions: Expansions, remodeling, alterations, or enlarging floor area by more than fifty percent would require a conditional use permit. 4 parking: As set forth in Chapter 12.100 and as follows: addition, expansion, a. If there are no covered off - street parking spaces existing or proposed, then any t. enlargement or alteration which increases the arkin floor s ace per unit existing or proposed, lthen eanytexpansion, b. If there is only one covered off-street parking p enlargement or alteration that would result in the gross c conditional use permitone thousand eight hundred twen.- five square feet, excluding garage area, will require a o 4o Rnv /rIerk /San Bruno Municipal _Code /Title_12 /96/060.htm1 6/1/2006 Section 12.96.060 R -1 and R -1 -D single - family residential districts. Page 4 of 4 ,F 16.. If there are two covered off - street parking spaces per unit existing or proposed, then any expansion, enlargement or alteration that would result in the gross floor area exceeding two thousand eight hundred square feet, excluding garage area, will require a conditional use permit. . d. An accessory building to and/or an interior private parking garage of a single family residence shall not be designed, constructed, altered or expanded to be used for the storage of more than three automobiles; nor exceed six hundred square feet when such interior parking and/or interior vehicle storage area upon a single parcel are combined, without first securing a conditional use permit. e. Tandem parking can be allowed by securing a parking exception from the planning commission provided the applicant demonstrates a hardship with the parking standards applied to the parcel in question. 5. Second story setback: Conditional use permits are required if the front plane of a second story is not set back at least five feet further than the front setback of the first story. Architectural projections such as eaves, bay windows, bow windows, chimneys, etc., are exempted from this additional setback. 6. Second story front decks: Conditional use permits are required for second story front decks which would: a. have an area larger than seventy -two square feet; or b. have a front depth greater than six feet; or c. not be set back at least eighteen inches from the face of the first floor of the house, or which would not provide a solid vertical surface around the bottom eighteen inches of the deck. 7. Second story windows: Conditional use permits are required for a second story having any transparent window, any other transparent opening, or any deck facing any interior side yard adjacent to an abutting property which abutting property has a side yard greater than ten feet. 8. Third stories: Conditional use permits are required for third stories, where any part of the three stories lie within the same vertical plane. This provision applies whether the third story is created for a new home or for an addition to an existing home. 9. Architectural Review Permits Required: All structures requiring a use permit by the provisions of the section shall first be reviewed by the architectural review committee of the planning commission. In addition, any structure which is increased by more than one thousand square feet, or which will be greater than three thousand square feet as a result of new construction or addition, shall be required to obtain an architectural review permit prior to receiving a building permit. *Exceptions: 1. Minimum setback. from sidewalk to a garage shall be twenty feet. 2. Minimum side yard for comer lots shall be ten feet. http:/ /oldweb.sanbruno.ca.gov /Clerk/San Bruno_Municipal Code/Title_12 /96 /060.html 6/1/2006_ V Welcome to the City of Monterey Park - Just the FAQs a �; Page 1 of 5 Languages: English I Es What is FAR (Floor Area Ratio) and how does N affect my property? In Issue 2 of 'Just the FAQs" the topic of residential density was discussed and the requires Area Ratio (FAR) was mentioned for consideration when developing certainsesidentially ar commercially zoned properties. Multiple - family (R -2 and R -3), manufacturing (M) and open zones do not have FAR requirements. As defined by the zoning code, FAR is the "total net zoning lot divided by the gross area of that lot (prior to any required dedications for street a of -way." In calculating FAR, you will note the use of "net floor area' which discounts certain features, including but not limited to, parking areas, stairwells and electrical and mechanics s as a type of measurement control of the intensity of building coverage, howeveriildt� Lontrolling e traditional bulk control measures such as height and yard setbacks. These requirer sed individually in each of the code sections of the particular zones, and summary hi le from the Planning Division. For single family (R -1) zoned lots, although the FAR d size increases, this does not mean that larger lots are penalized. In calculating FAR de also provides for use of a minimum square foot building area, whichever is greater . the in controlling out -of -scale homes with the.rest of the neighborhood. For example, a ty foot lot has a FAR of 0.4 or 3,000 square feet, whichever is greater. The FAR calcul in a square footage of 2,800 (7,000 X 0.4) square feet, but allows for a greater minim foot home if desired. In commercial zones, a larger FAR will serve as an incentive ft lots. Most of the City's commercial zones contain fragmented smaller parcels that s_ u- epodge development. In the high profile redevelopment and specific plan areas, encourages consolidation of lots for the purposes of larger, more well planned developmen• example, a 20,000 sq. ft. commercial lot in the C -B (Central Business) zone has a FAR of 0 calculation will result in a building square footage of 13,000 (20,000 X 0.65) sq. ft. If the lot t,++,% -/A ,.emir ei mnnterev- nark .ca.us /home /index.asp ?page =46u 1 6/1/2006 r , i C 7 c Fiig116ghts BUSlfla Home MOMerey Park . city Government City Govemgiiinj n Development Services n Planning _ Just the FAQs Development Services. Planning Just the FAQs is an occasionally updated feature from the Planning Division which highligl ► General Plan received at the public counter and by telephone. Staff responses are refer ► Planning Commission zoning questions the Monterey Park Municipal Code and other administrative interpretations. The Planning C ► Design Review Board the community on Issues of urban planning, land use and zoning laws. We welcome your q comments an development codes and our customer service. ► Zoning Information ► Just the FAQs What is Far (Floor Area Ratio) and how does it affect 'my property? . ► Agendas ► Forms What more do I need to provide in my commercial parking lot? ► Building 8 Safety ► Code Enforcement Wha is the General Plano the Ci ► Contact Us How many parking spaces do I need for my business? How many dwelling units can I build on my residential property? I need a sign for my business What process do I need to go through to out it up? Why can't I put a six -foot high wall in the front yard of my house? What do.I need to do to.replace that ol0 . asph.;p_lt.driveway with-a-new concrete one for my_s prgpeW What is FAR (Floor Area Ratio) and how does N affect my property? In Issue 2 of 'Just the FAQs" the topic of residential density was discussed and the requires Area Ratio (FAR) was mentioned for consideration when developing certainsesidentially ar commercially zoned properties. Multiple - family (R -2 and R -3), manufacturing (M) and open zones do not have FAR requirements. As defined by the zoning code, FAR is the "total net zoning lot divided by the gross area of that lot (prior to any required dedications for street a of -way." In calculating FAR, you will note the use of "net floor area' which discounts certain features, including but not limited to, parking areas, stairwells and electrical and mechanics s as a type of measurement control of the intensity of building coverage, howeveriildt� Lontrolling e traditional bulk control measures such as height and yard setbacks. These requirer sed individually in each of the code sections of the particular zones, and summary hi le from the Planning Division. For single family (R -1) zoned lots, although the FAR d size increases, this does not mean that larger lots are penalized. In calculating FAR de also provides for use of a minimum square foot building area, whichever is greater . the in controlling out -of -scale homes with the.rest of the neighborhood. For example, a ty foot lot has a FAR of 0.4 or 3,000 square feet, whichever is greater. The FAR calcul in a square footage of 2,800 (7,000 X 0.4) square feet, but allows for a greater minim foot home if desired. In commercial zones, a larger FAR will serve as an incentive ft lots. Most of the City's commercial zones contain fragmented smaller parcels that s_ u- epodge development. In the high profile redevelopment and specific plan areas, encourages consolidation of lots for the purposes of larger, more well planned developmen• example, a 20,000 sq. ft. commercial lot in the C -B (Central Business) zone has a FAR of 0 calculation will result in a building square footage of 13,000 (20,000 X 0.65) sq. ft. If the lot t,++,% -/A ,.emir ei mnnterev- nark .ca.us /home /index.asp ?page =46u 1 6/1/2006 ­leadership role in the area of affordable housing through this plan. Commissioner Fischer said in his opinion at this point the City must "let go of the details ", this plan is about direction. Concluding, Commissioner Fischer said what the City needs to do is choose a direction that defines us as a community. Chair Lonsbury asked for from-comments from the audience. Mr. John Helling, 5616 Woodcrest Drive, addressed the Commission and expressed his support for the report. Mr. Helling said he has benefited financially from purchasing a house in Edina and pointed out that today many residents of the City could not afford to purchase the houses they,live in. Mr. Helling acknowledged change can't be controlled but change can be influenced. Concluding, Mr. Helling said.he believes Edina should provide lifecycle housing choices, not only for its residents but also for the community at large. Ms. Sally Krusell, 6229 Hansen Road, told the Commission she moved to Edina as a single parent and raised her daughter, adding she would like other single parents to be able to afford to live in Edina. It's a great place to live and raise children with a great school system. Commissioner Brown said he agrees this is a very complicated issue, adding he supports finding ways to provide affordable housing for people. Commissioner Brown commented he just wants people to remember that Edina is very unique, and is not typical. Commissioner Brown pointed out Edina does not have an abundance of undeveloped land. It is fully developed which creates more challenges in providing affordable housing opportunities. Concluding Commissioner Brown said he is sensitive to this issue adding he appreciates all the work the task force has accomplished so far. Commissioner Brown stated at this time he just doesn't know the solution. He concluded the City Council has a big task ahead of them. Commissioner Grabiel stated he agrees this is an important issue, adding at this time for him there are still too many questions. Commissioner Grabiel agreed this issue is very complicated adding at this time for him it is too big and too complicated to support or not support - to be against or for. A discussion ensued with Commissioners again thanking members of the Housing Task Force for their excellent work and with Commissioners in agreement the Housing Succession Report is important. Chair Lonsbury thanked Ms. Ming and Mr. Massie and all who served on the task force, adding the Commission appreciates all their hard work. Discussion on the Massing Task Force — Cary Teague Planner Teague addressed the Commission and informed them the Massing Task Force has submitted their report for Commission comment. Planner Teague said Edina Code already has some good tools to direct development and redevelopment, adding the Task Force has also suggested additional tools. Commissioner Schroeder informed the Commission he was a member of the Massing Task Force, adding that serving on the task force was a challenge. Commissioner Schroeder h43 http: / /www.ci. edina. mn. us / citycouncil/ PlanningCommissionMeetingMinutes /20061101.h... 12/13/2006 MIN U1rlb said one question the task force struggled with was "if there is amassing problem out therg",s. and if there is a problem -what is the problem, or do the few "bad examples" overshadow the high quality of work that is consistently found in Edina's residential neighborhoods. Continuing, Commissioner Schroeder said what the task force found was that many residents are upset about the construction process (from start to finish) and in many neighborhoods the process continues to move up and down the street. Commissioner Schroeder said the continued remodeling and tear downs /re- builds.in many of Edina's neighborhoods goes directly to the issue of "livable neighborhood ". Concluding, Commissioner Schroeder explained the task force didn't want to launch headlong into amending the Zoning Ordinance, but to ,find ways to lessen the impact of change and continued construction. Chair Lonsbury said at this point his intention is to assist the�Council by focusing Commission comments on the five points recommended in the Massing Task Force Study. Mandatory neighborhood notification prior to permit letting. Property owners would be required to notify neighboring property owners of their intent to rebuild. Notification would include a perspective drawing. The City would not issue a building permit until the notification has taken place. The City would post drawings on the web. Comments from Commissioners: Commissioner Brown said his observation is when it comes to notification the City should error on the side of "over communication". Commissioner Brown added every attempt should be made to ensure residents are involved in the process. Commissioner Fischer agreed that every , opportunity should be taken to ensure communication; however, at present there is no "formal" notification when a project meets Code. Commissioner Fischer said the posting of a sign may be a good way to c. ommunicate to neighbors a house is undergoing renovation or tear - down / re- build. Chair Lonsbury commented in his opinion neighbors could become frustrated if they are notified of a project, object to the project but since it meets Code there isn't anything they can do about it. Chair Lonsbury said in his opinion this needs further evaluation and public education. 2. Neighborhood design education. Creation and support of an ongoing outreach program for neighborhood education and project review. Staffed by the City, volunteers, and, possibly outside. consultants, this group could create "neighborhood handbooks" tao;pred to the scale, history, style and setbacks of each neighborhood. This handbook could identify character - defining features for each neighborhood and how to meet modern needs while protecting them. Comments from Commissioners: All Commissioners were in favor of implementing methods of educating residents on the City's Ordinances and processes. 3. Neighborhood focus for comprehensive plan update. As part of the Comprehensive Plan, neighborhood geographic definition could be addressed. Upon completion, the zoning and building codes could be adjusted to Ito address issues such as height, bulk, 64+ http: / /www.ci. edina. mn. us/ citycouncil/planningCommissionMeetingMinutes /20061101.h.... 12/13/2006 MIN U 1 Do driveway coverage, and setback. Guidelines would be. customized by lot size and neighborhood context. No restriction would. be put on style, material or color. Comments from Commissioners: Commissioner Staunton said in his experience residents express alarm when a dramatic change occurs in the neighborhood, adding change. can be very emotional. Commissioner Staunton pointed out revisiting the Code in certain instances may be of benefit to the City. Continuing, Commissioner Staunton said one issue he has observed that can be very difficult_ and emotional is building height.. He noted many things come into play.when measuring building height. Grades can be manipulated with the end result a building dramatically higher than what previously existed. Concluding, Commissioner Staunton also noted increased building height and grade change are also issues that impact drainage. Commissioner Staunton said he supports really "digging into" this. Chair Lonsbury agreed, adding how building height is measured could be revisited, adding measuring. and averaging building height (similar to. how the City.determines front yard setback) may be a remedy. Commissioner Scherer said it is also critical to her how these issues are folded into.the Comprehensive Plan. Commissioner Scherer said in her experience many residents feel they don't they have the ability to "weigh in" on issues that concern them. 4. Voluntary neighborhood conservation districts. 5. Comments from Commissioners: Commissioners agreed the City Attorney may need to render an opinion on legal issues associated with. neighborhood conservation districts. 6. Proactive residential construction oversight and regulation. Comments from Commissioners: Commissioner Staunton agreed this is an issue for residents, adding it may be difficult to decipher if the issue is with an individual project or the fact that in certain neighborhoods it has become almost serial as projects and rebuilds continue to occur up and down the block. Commissioner Staunton noted many residents may not have an issue with a specific project, but when neighborhoods are continually subjected to construction projects it becomes difficult to sort out what the real issue is. Commissioner Fischer agreed this is an important issue, adding to a neighborhood. continued construction means more "people" coming and going with Edina's "fully developed" neighborhoods beginning to feel like brand new subdivisions. Continued discussion ensued with Commissioners in agreement there are remedies that could be implemented to reduce the stress of " Massing ". Commissioners acknowledged the "Massing" issue is not new to Edina and that the entire Country appears to be "suffering" from this issue. Audience comments: http: / /www.ci. edina.mn. us/ citycouncil/PlanningCommissionMeetingMinutes /20061101.h... 12/13/2006 a"&-. -- MINUTES Mr. Tom Anderson, 4603 Drexel Avenue informed the Commission on his block alone there are a number of reconstruction projects occurring simultaneously. Continuing, Mr. Anderson said in his opinion notification is critical. Mr. Anderson said setbacks are important, but equally as important. is lot coverage. Mr. Andersof slot trove ages Concludi g, Mr. as open space, adding they aren't considered when calculating Anderson said the City should also look at maintaining neighborhood character, and better ways to inform residents of construction plans in their neighborhood. Chair Lonsbury thanked .Commissioners and residents for their comments on the Massing Task Force Study. Comprehensive Plan Update — Dan Cornejo Mr. Cornejo addressed the Commission and informed them URS was chosen as consultant to aid in the updating of the City's Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Cornejo said the City will also choose a consultant to help update the Transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan, adding at this time a decision has not been made on that consultant. Continuing, Mr. Cornejo stated staff intends to have a Comprehensive Plan "kick off" meeting on December 4, 2006, 6:30 PM at Braemar. Mr. Comejo said the updated Comprehensive Plan needs to be adopted and is considered a legal document. Mr. Comejo told the Commission the Comprehensive Plan will define what type of community Edina wants to be, not only now but 5 to 15 years from now. Mr. Cornejo said the Comprehensive Plan is also about people that "aren't in the room ". Commissioner Staunton asked what mechanisms would be used to let Edina residents know the Comprehensive Plan is in the process of being updated. Mr. Cornejo said residents will be informed of the process through different avenues, to include the City website, Sun - Current, etc. Concluding, Mr. Cornejo said staff is looking into the possibility of an interactive website and e -mail system. Chair Lonsbury thanked Mr. Cornejo and stated updating the Comprehensive Plan is an important project with community involvement needed. Mr. Cornejo agreed. Other Business: Commissioner Staunton told the Commission he has become concerned with certain issues that have "cropped up" at zoning board meetings; one being tie votes and the other if an agenda item is denied can the applicant present the same plan to a different board to achieve a different outcome. Continuing, Commissioner Staunton said it would be helpful to have mechanisms in place to help channel some of the "vague" issues that occasionally crop up before the Zoning Board. Chair Lonsbury agreed and explained at this time City staff is looking into conducting A* http:// vyww. ci. edina. mn. us/ citycouncil/ PlanningCommissionMeetingMinutes /2006110 Lh... 12/13/2006 S�k Plans an� No�s� Plays MASSING COMPARABLES Off Shod') ov� +ke fa Ili w i NV rPeSPon 5617 Chowen Ave., Under current code existing height = 25 ft, new code height: 26.25 ft., a 1.25 ft increase in over -all height under the new code. The home would still conform to the over -all maximum height requirement if changed. The setbacks would increase for the second floor above the garage 4;and the entire south wall of the home would require an additional 7 "setback rom the south lot line. The house would no longer fit the lot given seTacks. It should be noted that side yard setbacks of the homes on adjacent properties with similar lot widths are 4.9 — 5 ft. Side yard setbacks for the new home are greater than original home and greater than setbacks provided by neighboring homes. 5908 Code Ave., Under the current code existing height = 30. ft, new code _ height: 34.8 ft, home would have to be 4.8 ft shorter. There would be no change in side yard setback. WENOW It should be noted that the lot is quite large, (32,187 sq ft). The house is approximately 4% of the lot. 5201 Indianola, Under the current code existing height = 28 ft, new code 3 height: 28 ft, there would be QW chania the new code requirements. There 37�� would also be no change in side yard- set acks. 7000 Antrim, Under the current code existing height = 30 ft, new code eight: 33.5 ft, home would have to be -.5 feet shorter. There would be no hange in side yard setbacks. It should be noted that the lot is large, (60, 300 sq ft). 4005 Grimes, Under the current code existing height = 28.25 ft, new code height: 30.35 ft, home would have to be 4.2 inches shnrfiz under new. code requirements. The setbacks would i s or living space above the garage on the north side and the new setback would require an additional 1 on the south side. The home would not fit on the lot given setbacks. ONNOMM 5504 Halifax Under the current code existing height = 30 ft, new code j height: 35 ft, home would have to be 5 ft short g. The setbacks would increase P IN by 1.5 ft on both the north and souin TTEres. I ne home would not fit on the lot even lRbacks. W It should be noted that the grade was altered to accommodate setback. This condition would not change given the proposed ordinance change. 5016 Schaefer Rd Under the current code existing height = 30 ft, new code height: 30 ft 3 inches, home would have to be 3 inches r so shorter. There would be no change in setbacks. It should be noted that the tower height is approximately 32 ft. Should there be any modification to the existing code regarding taller elements that may not be the "highest gable on a pitched or hip roof'? 5201 Halifax Under the current code existing height = 24 ft, new code height: 25.25 ft. The home would still conform to the over -all maximum height requirement if changed. There would be no chanc a in setbacks. It should be noted that this is a much larger home than the previous one and it conforms to all of ordinance requirements current and proposed. This is a corner lot with an exposed side street. I would expect to hear from the neighborhood on this one. 4212 Crocker Ave. Under the current code existing height = 26.6 ft, new code _ height: 27 ft. The home would still conform to the over -all maximum height requirement. Side yard setbacks would need to be 1.7 ft greater on each side. The home would not fit the lot.. IN 5101 Mirror Lakes Drive. Under the current code existing height = 21 ft, new ,® code height: 21.5 ft. till conform to th ( aggLiWl 3¢al height requirement. Side yara seTDaCKS w remain The same. 4001/4003 49th St. Under the current code exiting height = 30 ft, new code 1� height: 30.5 ft, the home would be 4 inches too tall. Setbacks would remain the same. 6128 Westridge Blvd. Under the current code existing height = 27.5 ft, new code ' height: 28.9 ft. The home would still conform to the over -all height requirement. Set backs would remain the same. 51.17 Ridge Road. Under the current code existing height = 30 ft, new code height: 33.3 ft, the home would have to be 3.3 ft shorter. The setbacks would not change. It should be noted_that even with the lot division, the property is still extremely large. The home is well within setback and coverage. Al eg,006 5 146 S iVaNYitJ %.1iii•i•iNi� _7 .�-- Denotes Surface Drainage NOTE: Proposed grades are sub je D to results soil tests. ," f� "! (/ Proposed building informati must be checked with app D HOMES building plan and developme grading plan before excave and construction. ��'�•� Proposed Top of Block Property Address: 5617 Chowen Avenue S. 9014 Proposed Garage Floor Edina, MN 113 Proposed Lowest Floor woi Property located in Section space 20, Township 28, Range 24, 8°J2.8 NPnneoin County, Minnesota. Proposed Basement Floor Under current code existing height = 25 ft, new code height: 26.25 ft., a 1.25 ft increase in over -all height under the new code. The home would still conform to the over -all maximum height requirement if changed. The setbacks would increase for the second floor above the gars a the entire south wall of the home would require an add' io al 7 " selDaCK Trom a south lot line. The house would no longer fit the lot givgn sMaCKS. It should be noted that side yard setbacks of the homes on adjacent properties with similar lot widths are 4.9 — 5 ft. Side yard setbacks for the new home are greater than original home and greater than setbacks provided by neighboring homes. � 898.3 8 8.61 9 997.96 / 898.3 898.3 foundot ion b •� I v _ _ 898. 4, co 9 - _ — J 1322/00 plat 0 -9 1322/00 8.35 f 90T 898.9 898.7 vi cant mess• 897.0 .,. 899: 895.31 Z. to I bituminous - . i.V_ .50 Ln I Ui p12Q1?OSED T=5 / — oo ENCE 196 51 0 ., a .. EIR 4.4 _ _ . o 3 oo s6. t = 3_5_ 0 e Io 1 899.9 EX'S tliiq Cri 1 1 29, 289 / 91. a 999, 900.4 ` 899: 895. 71 , 899. B Ln �!► ui CO 897.5 x....... , 66 �•8 900.9 \ bo... power pole 894.9 I 900.4. 134.90 meas. w /anchor F,94.9 90 1� 45 135.00 plat I foundotion U% HOUSE Proposed window we1Ls � No. 5621 — 900.7 L.� — - 35.0 — — — .... ..z m Rol 5908 Code Ave.. Under the current code existing height = 30 ft, new code height: 34.8 ft, home would have to be 4.8 ft shorter. There would be no change in side yard setback. It should be noted that the lot is quite large, (32,187 sq ft). The house is approximately 4% of the lot. / I � r iC� P b jrl C C d % 8 `o ° Of od +O , i A: 0 o� i0 A 4 S �` - b b / I - 14r. . 1 a 4.41 (meas)` -- 941.3 104. (plot) 6 1 6 Ix P I I �r is ~ + I C �eE O O buBding '•. ��' setback line V Ing house 1 f ' L --937 L84 - - - - x 934.7 \ 1, oposed house (9• App , .5 iV � C / 1 I I rI , I r� rI ra /♦ v I� ?29.1 A, 1 �I 1 ° loop v 3 1 ,jam• o ° 1 c r o f 55 I 1 II a A5—( I + 1 x--92 a 0 ~-933 —•�- ice! f. 4 3\ 933 09 0)-932- , 11 1 PM L I W N GRAPH 30 — Scale: 1 v b D Deso ption O; + ( (As provided by r, w L Lot 9. Block 1, �•. :. , b s LO r • IC ; C Area :.', • .�, lob / I � r iC� P b jrl C C d % 8 `o ° Of od +O , i A: 0 o� i0 A 4 S �` - b b / I - 14r. . 1 a 4.41 (meas)` -- 941.3 104. (plot) 6 1 6 Ix P I I �r is ~ + I C �eE O O buBding '•. ��' setback line V Ing house 1 f ' L --937 L84 - - - - x 934.7 \ 1, oposed house (9• App , .5 iV � C / 1 I I rI , I r� rI ra /♦ v I� ?29.1 A, 1 �I 1 ° loop v 3 1 ,jam• o ° 1 c r o f 55 I 1 II a A5—( I + 1 x--92 a 0 ~-933 —•�- ice! f. 4 3\ 933 09 0)-932- , 11 1 PM L I W N GRAPH 30 — Scale: 1 v $ $ LE G END 0 IRON rc — UALIT �fa!^uge r'ian i `- i QS SANIT Flequired prkor `r ;c [MM cAS b D Deso ption O; + ( (As provided by r, w L Lot 9. Block 1, according to th Hennepin Count: 1.9 x x 945.0 ,9 A Area Drhe and sh"a Stoop on south ._.._.., / S House Shed .y T Total Hardco%er of e ey T Total Lot Area b1' P Percent Hardco-A S + + LE G END 0 IRON rc — UALIT �fa!^uge r'ian i `- i QS SANIT Flequired prkor `r ;c [MM cAS .972±SF :L DRIVE LLOWABIJ PORCH. STO It 150 SF a) L_ a) W r- -0 Ft 0 (D E a) CO C14 0) II L cm x a) fA 0 0 a) u (D 'o CD cm a) 5 o c: cu 3: . r_ L) 0 co -a 4- a) C 4,.o co 0 cu Lo l�` 1P I WMAUL rLu%nmow.= EXCAVATION 800-252-1166 IST FLOOR -887.0k 7 —0 (/) —I-- -- 0c):,< LLi sk S-2181, 71, A T 61, 140.3* PLAT' \1 S'8lQ-42:L0:E 19W. sl5w q L 0 — —FF= E eas G -------- 7e 7T TO EE BITUMINOUS f 1 P -STORY WD-FRAME Li fko-nm-m TOTAL RECTAN 53.5 X 68.5 5021 Ilk k, WALLS REQUIRED N I - I 1-1 f I �% TO BE RE OVED 1 1 /MR b± 97 1 : \\ 2—ST WD —FR A 27� A _GONG C4 IRI REM IE HILL & RE—GRADE a. 34.3* (ao 0. Wg rn In S89-4250-& 11D 2—ST WD—FR TOP BLK=87.8± ,tip GARAGE TITLE INF( NO TITLE 5 SAGE 4bE F. Lu (81.5 m U) < _j 27.6* 00 2—ST WD—FR ,c Lu a CL POSSIBLE MINOR L o 0 RETAINING WALLS r .c 1/2" IPF 4.4 W & 0.5 N- REQUIRED (MINOR GAP BET. OLD SL uj LN NTH NEW) 2 8 7 —0 (/) —I-- -- 0c):,< LLi sk S-2181, 71, A T 61, 140.3* PLAT' \1 S'8lQ-42:L0:E 19W. sl5w q L 0 — —FF= E eas G -------- 7e 7T TO EE BITUMINOUS f 1 P -STORY WD-FRAME Li fko-nm-m TOTAL RECTAN 53.5 X 68.5 5021 Ilk k, WALLS REQUIRED N I - I 1-1 f I �% TO BE RE OVED 1 1 /MR b± 97 1 : \\ 2—ST WD —FR A 27� A _GONG C4 IRI REM IE HILL & RE—GRADE a. 34.3* (ao 0. Wg rn In S89-4250-& 11D 2—ST WD—FR TOP BLK=87.8± L-4 C SHED > C14 ,tip GARAGE TITLE INF( NO TITLE 5 SAGE 4bE Ld 3c-XFL PROPE _-Z L-4 C SHED > C14 CONTIGU .c TITLE INF( NO TITLE C:) Ld X85.0 E Ld PROPE > 5021 Ind Edin( .c 1/2" IPF 4.4 W & 0.5 N- .b (MINOR GAP BET. OLD SL uj LN NTH NEW) 2 8 L-4 C SHED > C14 J!," MA04A. 10 EUA _lL cb VVLJ r tN'-t 86 14ft" 0 140.3±\�LAT 3/4' IF 1.6 W & 1.6 S. a4.� (1.6' G�P BET. OLD d SURVEY LN WITH NEW). ou- Z u, w co _j Dave APPARENT "GAP" IN 616 P ;MONUMENTATION OF PRIORI' a? Golder SURVEY WITH PRESENT I r1l R Y 612-1 CONTRACTOR NOTE: zu r_ I 1 .1 . PROPOSED STRUCTURES SHOWN ARE GENERAL REPRESENTATIONS OF A PLAN F X85.0 E Ld VERTICA Ld .c 0 uj 2 8 3 L'i C) tK . A t4t, J!," MA04A. 10 EUA _lL cb VVLJ r tN'-t 86 14ft" 0 140.3±\�LAT 3/4' IF 1.6 W & 1.6 S. a4.� (1.6' G�P BET. OLD d SURVEY LN WITH NEW). ou- Z u, w co _j Dave APPARENT "GAP" IN 616 P ;MONUMENTATION OF PRIORI' a? Golder SURVEY WITH PRESENT I r1l R Y 612-1 CONTRACTOR NOTE: zu r_ I 1 .1 . PROPOSED STRUCTURES SHOWN ARE GENERAL REPRESENTATIONS OF A PLAN F ME =1==== INZ= 2 =1= mi :- � 7000 Anti' Under the current code existing height = 30 ft, new code. , home would have to be`s 1.5 feet shorter- There would be no iMAR change in side yard setbacks. ".! It should be noted that the lot is large, (60, 300 s ft Li EA of I o _±LL n0 b �O 9 `P I IleL a g ET. 85 1-2 �— c� 5 . W 30.0 n ,0 99ti$ a �• 17.5.6 N TFE= 993.25 to nj c &h o �. EXISTING 'ri `V N+ W OUSE 0 6= PROPOSE) � WICKM_ AN 986 �9LFE =984.4 r` o (9 _ IM.2 M 7.5 •016.68 9R - - -- _ A, Tpti Ob (494.0 :-- .9PS (9 2.0) ,. �� ��`� �.• hV I 99�. I X 99 9� I POOL 6 (X(994. 9 g59 0 O E �a 2. rX 4% �a 0 5.7 (9 2.5)X 98.0 I g I 9 b. La a• P I 99yPR I _ �0 • 0 O� ,ryrQ�` r° R T. LLTE �T I �p�'►�r Qua �o a O �'� 1 T 6.0 +goy. I I P �, 04 �a \0 =992.5 9 I 992.5 X/ a try Co �_�.� ♦ Sc�,ti p t•_... SILT FENCE � e� .7 S 87 017' Pt ;r 254.3 EAS f Al TRANS �f� 4 7� - A'J 5— ,�rY((((1fIVIVpi6 M ■QI,�I ..I ■m ml No moll, 00"i FINI ED FLOOR _ FOUND Found Property Monument E V.= 899.82 IRON SET Set 'erty Monument IRON (Minn. Reg. Na 23677) Concrete 90 Retaining WaN h FINISHED FLOOR Fence F - Under the current code existing height = 28.25 ft, new code : 30.35 ft, home would have t r under new code irements. 'ncre r Ruing space above the ge on the north side and the new se ac wou d require an- additional 1.87 ft he south side. The home would not fit on the lot given setbacks. r iivt,ritU° PLUUK,_ v X(894.1) Elevaaaer ELEV = 895.53 rr ` rn Proposed Drainage Arrow 4� -3 \� 9s EXISTING BUILDING `�, dating Drainage Arrow �� --- - - --,\ - I , „ ' l� h i SET . ' -- ��. I 89 36 22 1 8 IRON �.- — a S 9 '9.4 -^ � 92 2 Fn LO -- 893.3 89� 599 I 8.2 ' `SD SHED N/ `P ��°' 9 p &9Q 69g i �/ / _ FINISHED FLOCR ELEV. = 895.02 8.2". 9 -- ( - - - -- a - -- -p 39.20 _ Q C*IM S AVENUE 9Q ? • - - - - - -- CONC._ - OR UILDING 1 �j 1 �.r-PROP RET. WALL �- /N TONE - $g3• 9 l 886. 85.0 ` -,� X STEPS �::: FO PRINT AREA _ / AVER °� oI _ 1,9 SOUARE FEET I 2 o, 0.0 �°E8 9 �,}� j 12.0 91.6 it 00 0 --o. Qfl FINISHED FLOC ­�'' e r a ELEV.= 896.92 (P 71 5r °�� g.O1 �. Bj 90$ -X� 3 -Z - 891. 5 %';� gh. W r& C 6> $$g.:;.:::::: 885.7 '�-ZNA 89'36'22" W 135.28`' N J �%� 397 g° EXIST] N BUILDING 8s � FOUN[ O I \ 6 ; L -WOOD STEPS q$ I IRON `L Vh� i •\, �- PROPOSED RET. WALL �t ELEV. -- 8913E R :�;�+ I X� STEPS FINISHED FLOOR - E L EV. = 891.41 Ile 0 ABOVE GROUND BUILDING FINISHED FLOOR 20 10 0 20 ELEV.= 882 88----_ �S1 SCALE IN FEET [0 41 . .......... -ice .......... 1 Ll E ilm HIM "all "M-E WED ;, HOMEBUILDERS Idg. Dept EOW A24t, 865.44 1 HY- I Proposed Top of Block 991?.IZ Proposed Garage Floor $ 8.7z Proposed Lowest Floor - IS Under the current code existing height 30 ft, new code Type of Building - F'u ll C34swMe.r�- �lalK• _ It should be noted that the grade was altered to accommodate setback. This condition would not change given the proposed ordinance change.. RETAINING SPLIT RAIL Pvop..�.� WALL --FENCE-- R`�r _; P z p, 291 !le _ir /.X -W I U I A, cli _ 1 CY .10 / d / °° "a o a- o N / �f'op- 9eoo 64'-4" N / ' I / Cie�o+•.- 810. ^54.33 t; 29 vent NE 1/4. .Sec. 19. Twp. 28. R. 43.42 EXISTING RETAINING - WALL 896.37 32.47 7FOUND 9910 \ :I I g w 0 33.0 rn c.n - -- CC0 I MANHOLE TOP= 895.37 FOUND IRON / 7 I Z Wok 888.11 165.32 \� GREENHOUSE 891.8 872.75 / x 879.11 883.58 887.43 889.98 Tip 4400 B.No. 610.0 896.79 D L - z O 8 vt 54.33 ,rr C X) m 7 ' -�. I i s / to... 00 N o OW inol: n I' !le _ir /.X -W I U I A, cli _ 1 CY .10 / d / °° "a o a- o N / �f'op- 9eoo 64'-4" N / ' I / Cie�o+•.- 810. ^54.33 t; 29 vent NE 1/4. .Sec. 19. Twp. 28. R. 43.42 EXISTING RETAINING - WALL 896.37 32.47 7FOUND 9910 \ :I I g w 0 33.0 rn c.n - -- CC0 I 1 8 3 - - -- 890 � T 74 D j 21 1.6 2 I 89 .48 899.94 FOUND I/ I , I PICKET- IRON I; � ✓ < 3, ELMWOOD TERRACE FENCE ` A 4 1 9-1P-31-4 A. %,? ►�/ ily to the above named person or persons wears, mortgages or title Insurers. n are tram plate of record of Information provided by dient. MANN TOP= 898.24 Id 11- devotions must be verified by client. INV =8 8.29 his survey was prepared by me or under 31.12 _ ` and that I am a duly Registered Land. is e State of Minnesota. 24th Signed: day of October 20 06 Revised: October 25th, 2006. Mi ton E. Hyland, Minn. Reg. . 20262 MANHOLE TOP= 895.37 TC 1NV= 886.98 e4s.�4- x A � D L - z O z [*� D C X) m 7 ' � Ar 847. 1 8 3 - - -- 890 � T 74 D j 21 1.6 2 I 89 .48 899.94 FOUND I/ I , I PICKET- IRON I; � ✓ < 3, ELMWOOD TERRACE FENCE ` A 4 1 9-1P-31-4 A. %,? ►�/ ily to the above named person or persons wears, mortgages or title Insurers. n are tram plate of record of Information provided by dient. MANN TOP= 898.24 Id 11- devotions must be verified by client. INV =8 8.29 his survey was prepared by me or under 31.12 _ ` and that I am a duly Registered Land. is e State of Minnesota. 24th Signed: day of October 20 06 Revised: October 25th, 2006. Mi ton E. Hyland, Minn. Reg. . 20262 Mm lull out MIN _ !al .Ci!o0s� = •!5�y_r_�lei-..1� =.- - W-= ..�;IIIi.•R_� d OW& it FAR TIPd I "G 1 Is 0 1s. PA Q sUac Ba►a�e < CONTRACTORVEMALLINFORMATION 1 "•r-o BEFORE STARTING CONSTRIICM 3c(b 1-79 C—L. R ,o= _ 1 _ IR�QUUrZE- D .� X6.1 946.3 CC ACTFRGItdF. RMI r 939.6 M9 ro/ A !Z v i. v �, 952 - 826-0371-- 9 g� �- TC e =27e00 *03 945.6 n 41.7 TC .tl 1 TC6. 946• Real 2 TC as.1 rr V tL t^ I ' c n r 74.58 VC / J 94 ����.WWWyV►++++v_,,�a....b,,,, \ 9 8 47 944'6 a I S r 45.7 � 946. 3 47.2 Rc4 ' 00 BE -5 943.0 I X1.8 941.0 40.5 945.4• ce Refel^�p 9 6.8 58 TC EAST T �C g Cedar k 4s o 8. .� \ 4� .00 9 1.2 TC 4 I \ l4' S race \ 946. \ - \947. - 44.9 x 944.7 \ - 941. 10' Spruce \ 3.1 � o' 940.4 9 \ 947.9 947 1x945.8 t6' Oak (2) 941.2 m Tc \ g `\ 941.7 38' L>ollonwood • 5 9 945.4 g a J 942.9 944.0 944.8 906.1 x 24 ockber \ 440.7 �x 9a6.1 TC 946.0 d d 943.8 9x6.5 x \ 942.8 944.7 n \ 945.2 9a0.7 /e Spruce M ' \ \ I 5 I I 947.1 947.0 x x 946.7 *' P- I Y 9a3.0 1 I 943.1 946.9 x \ 1 ' / � 942.6 I \ \ N q•83 ° A q$\ \ I TC1.0 t. 4i jR30 / ,2.7 d1',e I x' ` ^ANT x 94 5 g q f>• 3 946.7 ' 8 346.4 \ I\ I C) 942.1 t DO \ i 19.77` / x 942.6 / x 947.3 aI - 9.• ��OSEO dry ►M1 \ %/� ��_' vl 941.3 ` .30 \ �/Rro a. N017 t O . ".. / \ TC / 42.3 79.3 7 2q•3•J .� 75•� W'1L/rg7t -'^'WT Q8* ix 9a6.S\ 945.7 ' 94418, 1as,' .__, x938.7. 941.1 x941.1\14' Sprue° 46. rV 551 •26Nw2 13.,2 29.8Tj 7.5 VI 941.1 941.0 \943.1 \ + `I, _ . ' 946.1 °/ ro Yj 9.7$ `• 31. rY 8 ,�,v� / 945.0 44. I \ 16' p4 /E ,� n t3 x W 'v 940. 40.5 \ 9�.7 ``` 943.8 \ � � � /v W 946.4 � i TIC I or- - - x 945.3 / -, ^la / N \ \2 10 ✓ -p (0 A� x I 1 940.4 x ` ,II x pl - 93B.3ti11 � ` 939.6 939.5 941.0 4 "6oruce 9a3.5� \8qe 916.7 943.8 .I I X ` x 945.1 939.6 \ d39.2 \ 939.0 941.0 1fi' Elr 2� I 945.9 \40.6 6' Spruce x 1941.8 34' Oak 10' Spruee \ .I \ 37.3 4 Walnut "11 944.0 9,0.2. \ 944 � .4 \938.0 940.2 lo' Spruce 943.6 �8qq xxxJJJ"' / 9.42.7 11 �9 `S�q °4 \2 -� C° 943.6 9 1. I TC �\ 18' W91or (3 ) g428' Spruce y U- `� a I J ° IM3.2 937.2 d I c 37. V 9 937.2 \\ a `- `9`4.2 t� �_ I 37.1 937.2 \B.3 \ \ I 4.0 94( L Water Elewtkm 937.2 937.2 v V (9/06/06) ` O1 100 Yr. XWL - 939.1 937.1 \ a (Par City of Edina) I I 937.2 \ 1 937.111 5`s 1 •"._J Bearings Under the current code existing height = 30 ft,. new code 8 Denot ot el s, home would have to be 3 inchPC nr cn chn or There Deno( 000.o Donal would be no change in setbacks. ■ . (at door) _ Deno( It should be noted that the tower height is approximately 32 ft. Should there be / y d°''°"' A [ final drive.dy Deno( any. modification to the existing code regarding taller elements that may not be /1 D a actor. the "highest gabe on a Eitched or hi roof? . LOT 1- L r2AiTLJLLU AUDITION HENNEPIN COUNTY. MINNESOTA We hereby certify to CHARLES CUDD CO. that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Land, Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Dated this 27th day of October A.D., 2006. 13 -A A- 1_+4_rr7 /inn - ww 1 _ .� oe:__�. o,nAlrco cwrctktcrolnlr_ o e 874.0 1 66� a/ /v /I nWA `�' 878 w 4 36.,5' -- (878.2) 876.2 / ^ /878.5 x I �'��6, 30.3 0 32.33 (878.2) o N -p I l U walk I o \ .r I PROPOSED 4.33 \ 877.2 x o HOUSE o 87 .9 5. 1 a4 nn I Found / Iron 38..6 .\x 876.0 �\ (E &P) CJ 876.5 36. x 8 751, / GARAGE N N Concrete C Found 876 Iron I� I N I � 6 tk TO 26.2 25.33 patio '` 876.21 -` _ 876.70 x x 5., - - 5. 1 r• �- (E &P) �-- (877.1 x -► (E &P) (E &P) 876.7x. rx 877. x ,876.49 4 x 8773 x 877.3 Adjacent �� (E &P)/ x 877.2�x x 878.0 877.9 x - - -1 49. 25---- o N 89 033'44 " E ZZ Adiccent House 878.4 x I ' / ' ' L 30 I 0 T TION: TN s 112 of Lot 39, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK SECOND ADDITION 'E AD 5201 Halifax Avenue, Edina, Minneso4o PROPOSED BUILDiN House /Garage 21 Total Hardcover 2� Lot Area 8; Z of Hardcover = 2 .Misc. Areas T � C '� O ._ C U O U L (B (c r- O O E o'Nn D C = U L CD E :3 X O ~ 04 C6 a��a� II - U Q 0,,L -� (p O D E O O L L- O L O C C: -a �- C_ •� C -C X O CU s- ` O O a) E U � U a) L- -0'.0- �,�. oC amwX c0i Q � aCi a :- _� �-° U E o `Cn '0. U E O - � 3 � `n L 'a ~ E U N C C 0-0 � O �La) C D U - O 0) a H O -C 0 CCUXX cXO C a) O a) C E -a = a) 5 E L _ � N ° 3 o C N a) .. 0 O Front Woik /Stoop Drive Pctic 1 k x 874.2 8 874.4 x ; ; x N 89 056'17" : : (rx87 ),-875 - - -BM•� �t ►1�ty p poles 149.6 a a,b� 874.9 8 875.63 D Drive ^d 38.08 7 74.33 9 9.69 44 . s_��N � L 1 876.3 L � .0 I x 8 o N -p I l U walk I o \ .r I PROPOSED 4.33 \ 877.2 x o HOUSE o 87 .9 5. 1 a4 nn I Found / Iron 38..6 .\x 876.0 �\ (E &P) CJ 876.5 36. x 8 751, / GARAGE N N Concrete C Found 876 Iron I� I N I � 6 tk TO 26.2 25.33 patio '` 876.21 -` _ 876.70 x x 5., - - 5. 1 r• �- (E &P) �-- (877.1 x -► (E &P) (E &P) 876.7x. rx 877. x ,876.49 4 x 8773 x 877.3 Adjacent �� (E &P)/ x 877.2�x x 878.0 877.9 x - - -1 49. 25---- o N 89 033'44 " E ZZ Adiccent House 878.4 x I ' / ' ' L 30 I 0 T TION: TN s 112 of Lot 39, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK SECOND ADDITION 'E AD 5201 Halifax Avenue, Edina, Minneso4o PROPOSED BUILDiN House /Garage 21 Total Hardcover 2� Lot Area 8; Z of Hardcover = 2 .Misc. Areas T � C '� O ._ C U O U L (B (c r- O O E o'Nn D C = U L CD E :3 X O ~ 04 C6 a��a� II - U Q 0,,L -� (p O D E O O L L- O L O C C: -a �- C_ •� C -C X O CU s- ` O O a) E U � U a) L- -0'.0- �,�. oC amwX c0i Q � aCi a :- _� �-° U E o `Cn '0. U E O - � 3 � `n L 'a ~ E U N C C 0-0 � O �La) C D U - O 0) a H O -C 0 CCUXX cXO C a) O a) C E -a = a) 5 E L _ � N ° 3 o C N a) .. 0 O Front Woik /Stoop Drive Pctic 1 k 25.33 patio '` 876.21 -` _ 876.70 x x 5., - - 5. 1 r• �- (E &P) �-- (877.1 x -► (E &P) (E &P) 876.7x. rx 877. x ,876.49 4 x 8773 x 877.3 Adjacent �� (E &P)/ x 877.2�x x 878.0 877.9 x - - -1 49. 25---- o N 89 033'44 " E ZZ Adiccent House 878.4 x I ' / ' ' L 30 I 0 T TION: TN s 112 of Lot 39, Block 1, SOUTH HARRIET PARK SECOND ADDITION 'E AD 5201 Halifax Avenue, Edina, Minneso4o PROPOSED BUILDiN House /Garage 21 Total Hardcover 2� Lot Area 8; Z of Hardcover = 2 .Misc. Areas T � C '� O ._ C U O U L (B (c r- O O E o'Nn D C = U L CD E :3 X O ~ 04 C6 a��a� II - U Q 0,,L -� (p O D E O O L L- O L O C C: -a �- C_ •� C -C X O CU s- ` O O a) E U � U a) L- -0'.0- �,�. oC amwX c0i Q � aCi a :- _� �-° U E o `Cn '0. U E O - � 3 � `n L 'a ~ E U N C C 0-0 � O �La) C D U - O 0) a H O -C 0 CCUXX cXO C a) O a) C E -a = a) 5 E L _ � N ° 3 o C N a) .. 0 O Front Woik /Stoop Drive Pctic 1 k Front Woik /Stoop Drive Pctic 1 k 7oAp'%, w C co. 2)474 -W �. 1,LE DRARM Nove 6 13, 2006 .04, BiA 2, Qo*a & Qowefs Fa mAditn, Hemepu 7a 6anowsk bey hues of the legal desk rOmwlncb You fiunidAd• rovemmta we deed impaaunt awq momm►mfa to milk the Comas of the property. essmy ro show elevadm diffam m MIbe sk br dib borne, we are not as fsmffierwitbya hMo ph W as ,, aw* om poposed location and siting offie home and yard our plans befae oonat wdw begun• Abo, we are not as ldmg offcW eod z Wq offieW u thb wronmity are• Be a, or my od o offir eb tbat may have jM25dim over dIe royalsbefaseb* nbecM=Cdon• =we u detramuug dr adw for camsdocdm oo bb site, that pmpw- Qeck &e dev ft of at bastono other feattlro ROM u8 braking Stale house Nomber 9235, set, norms otherwise ndi a boa motmd them, while ezbtmg devsh m are abowa ased flow ofstoffi Watson the site, apurtor gurveywo VVW by me or m a IWmsed Pwfeadond BOOM and fo FbTmmsota. *ala (,96(Kek 4212 Crocker Ave. Under the current code existing height = 26.6 ft, new code height: 27 ft. The home would still conform to the over -all maximum height requirement. Side yard setbacks would need M he 1 -7 ft greater on eaclLSide. The home would not fit the lot. _ J PB OP OSE10 I s L E 54 TIONS Top of Foundation 878.5 Garage Floor 878.0 Lowest Floor 869.8 Benchmark* 878.1 *Top of hydrant as shown BOMMARIL 1W NN MORM A� 6 i nd �Q� ding WBS�CDearei �'" Plan CSI M4MOCMbefM&-O9for I XM fW to Onde "uW o50ty hocedo !�� REQh11RED BY LAW ten, Xlna xis+ ' XMw XPU _ 2D fond Xen2 , Ina �i S 891746' E - -- 200.19 - -y o. 67a8 :.►' 2071 876 % 2011 b . lob" 5ipr.�YVaieao XIBA VU FDKX oI v .M.I a lens 0 so �� Moor QO6r7.A:T: ;L10G1PR[OF 3 ;' o 1la ry 41 poaadw eYa ITO • j je a $ , n / d BQbaA A GM DN RIB= A t I 4 OO rt•. a"mBBaaa.m �n i+ x o p NOW I z t11910O"M 'D meow c .} •y! a .... i z� ''-- -- XM9 N Oki= i �ILO m 'WX ' — r l • • . .. •: �� b 1� 1 0 �t ' ms l� .o�� n �"• �VW"eo"dtB�Ib41mOfIedBOdlmBLtil QIN' "y Ap.bda"Belah6dwtias10aB1Ydq diM - 4,a f 6ARA6E _ J �► l od ,b.iiEr+i`oan"iw : s r — =-,2 -.►- �' ... Ia►0( I� °� ,20034 -- A$' p W s 8950$2• f FEJ xI�I xe�I1 •C Xma X"II 595 e» l I P SCALE Provide asbBBt survey indicating i 0p q U y1 tepoffoundacenp4atobackfi8 V M 0 20 , NOM- All ffiQS M I DINGS T OVER y��' DEPT O #c. No. OEM,? ai���II(I%=— 4i_ IF IIIM .4m"IIp 1©1ns ,, 04 ,' - \ 5101 Mirror Lakes Drive. Unden current code existing height = 21 ft, new DC:> code height: 21.5 ft. The home would - 11 ¢' height requirement. Side yard setbacks wouTd remain �2. N ? / / \� —. 903 O/ / J O- _2_5,p CIS tt 3 907 i \ r `M7 k ;* / O�' , . 10) . EXIS�NO s1 , \ •� ` 1.'` C LINE do) ; do) cv .►, \ OJ (O f 13x \ \ "c,► " K\ \ 51\� \ j PROPOSE a J HOUSE �° \ \.. -- FIRST FLIT 410, ;i. 9 x 9.5-- _ ' ELE. O A71 ,s/o oye W ko:p ` { gl — — _ 41.83 v.0> , .9 K ' d EI6 Thu e ` ` '�''' '2.► I WCCT `- -�'iTl rf nn I „u4 K5, TYP. ALL ELEV. .u:.mrrns.eo.m., aoomwmm.�lsr r•os•e1a.1...e.. arms � m mmsrmr r..e. mmm rr mom aw1o..Y1 yssr- I.wmlArmwwsmeel Y m.mD Itpmlm. m... &VENOM .S.rr• � W Company 061 ...d a,- Bmm 100 Lraenor, M&W b Mu u. -True e11e fl1.W roYF..6R- Ar_ _ fQ10Allp1 A. Al- -.Y u. ElT 11RCMq A6- FAST (MAW AA- HMN (6ACA Al- . . _R NIX) A6- . . . . A.- . . . . _ . . 61. . . . . . y........ 61- ARCHITECT ew.an ca.ACr� 1.¢ e.YeeAn w snvo srlaFer, a.re Ens oaaeloanfemu 6.5. �- Ars -ree wne v.tm. A-7.aCTLPAL EW.ME m ear HArI.. srlezr lb-C -sw PRO., .1 61011 Tam -ylm 1YOIC 10.171.6. GEf�Rd,L CONTR^�' -TC Ye7ae C067R.;11a rot Box m MAlit �a .Y Mom = hK% 6011 am PDX da- a6 -lesa ISSUED i -- _______ -- - _ # - __- __lt�___ ____ },�_- I _____ -- _- _ -_ -_ - I, _ - STREE? ELEVATION ( UEST) - -- — — — SCALE: 1/4'0--m- 0 2 INOO 8 16 ........ ... ....r... EISENSTAE How 5101 MIRROR LAKES D EDINA, MN 55696 SHEET �_NI Scale: _ cn Under the current code exiting height = 30 ft, new code helg t: 30.5 ft, the home would be 4 inchPC too tall. Setbacks would remain the same. U u�-4o -,mea 51.25 51.21 15°s ce 1 1 Rock I PROPOSED ELEVA, I n Rock I GARAGE FLOOR I I ( f 1 5 pruce I TOP FOUNDATION 15°Si1 LEVEL @ (81 I AVG. ETBA ONI ce MAIN S K UN YARO n r0ei p In C4 I C4 � I� h Front Entry = 892.7 I Garage Floor - 884.( J I Top Block = 892.2 4-E I } 1 (882.3 1 14� 1 19.54 13� 19.54 14.24 1' Overhang I `�4 4�1 •- / I 8.87 I 8.87_ 14.25 14.24 �` C 41.8 8s PROPOSED BUILDING I f :Z3 $ Y Uj 1.7 I M M ` X2.3 (Y CP J-I y y�l \I1` b 5.1 < I �� I 83 1� y 15.33 15.33 t9, I 4 I x88 _ N h I Garden _ 1 ?� 1 4 8 < Storage Bldg. 14.25 (8 1.5) �� (891.5) 9. f 20 °I Black Walnut �. b I I Z — L C� 10 I M I I , 0 10 °Spruce 1 112 °Oak 15"S ruce �0 °Sp ce I I 5125 8 Spruc$°Se 51.25 15 Spruce I —X 102.0 meas. X X X Was 102.45 plat Any PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Lot 1, Block 1, REPLAT OF LOTS 1,2,3 & 4. LUND KRUSE ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel A: The west 51.25 feet of Lot 1, Block 1, REPLAT OF LOTS 1,2,3 & 4, LUND KRUSE ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Parcel B: That part of Lot 1, Block 1; REPLAT OF LOTS 1 2 3 & 4 , LUND KRUSE ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying east of the west 51.25 feet thereof. / f l _. > 1 I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under P Y AMYii d.1YL, PIaW Ml1K OA! GO! ONW w• x r °D OrHeW•YlOrA1C JL I °� AsWLTNNxB - ° f w•.r1WfATti 1,01® • ' x ri• W N]f ®Lew Na® +oree WxrMW1ELMl w � LM u wu,®a,o flL /' '! T cartrmee.en .,ZEP.,•. ' AM"? 111YL8! AlNYLi T lTIpOO � °� Q MO. OFWa / � l,M.e amen - r x )Y• W WAX LEY NiHI Or9! WAX w•xrnWA,rc.AlaAm ° i i Trem eNs - Aar METK OIQ ® O.Mw•xr FPO" X• r.rcmweeAnar rTOIM MlTK Ora lOfL OI9tWx4 .. AA SP -A / \ wmm liT1E 1111I®! -rN TiT 04..M wLw W%W, Tw Tmao MMTlO".m w•xrrmu=1101 w .. :.. ...e. . q�flTTrSxr Ovwsra` , I n MOAIM VAGM WJ i i� &m*Lm- >— w•NrrwAMnmw ' • NBMMlTK K•R1{. Y I� i II °� T!FII w NOCW II - -y - ACNYLf sedJT tl _ - `y _ - - N�II MAL OI?m�tl O/Olw xP ■ Lr, . O.�w•x yr lw rAlaA m . AY,NLT WtlIH m" TM,m AT TQ - PPW p=W PWTK LNO1 -A. t r ea+! m, r ��• I� AlNNLT N°rllY! r cmM eNAOSrO� OBCOW t RLg1 sm -or m — W %O MWTGO TIQ7OD - WxPNRAMMM _ - / 3 w L !°nao 'l. Wxv,RA,6,101 .- nlrATee llu000 nmTQRO°"NenLw a acaN a�. WxaM mc11W, } !• L Imdip . ... 1• %Tasty .... . . �? n�io ar+ I- I I ■ 111 x r°°r I W"N= nnoa,! I I MFG! • OOICYI N �1 I Wiera.w v�YeNwe° I Il.r,.„„N�. WLpo° FT Li ' IP - eGIE!!mi b�E"J -"6_ w• %.• MR.TIL 1W1 QlLM � -- --- - - - - -- - - -- - - - - _ ma • • .. eO • •!L — — — — 4.RAd' :... HAT 0.0at PM M Im -di Oa W `W aZW,Tw, a�nnrom .. iovhetiolls fr: -. LAIVW.AM 'a "® T1 tafxeDartmwr L. 1 0-11 1 e o :t t:E sebmitte!' to to I I W %rMw,a I ns, eo t r to their Be • oeleas®a NIS pn9es I I I I I w KTANW 10 0 I I oil:woeoso FL --- t------ - - - - -1 m' a�a,! see m" W � 1 y mnsioaot6110tF -- -- - - - - -- I I _TW ° CFAAP — — — — �- 3. 8VACAIa� r FRONT ELEVATION ---- - ----- -- ----- ---- --"-- -- - - -� P Y 101 PIaW Ml1K OA! GO! ONW w• x r °D OrHeW•YlOrA1C JL Y MON,OTAL w SMA a°me•r / \ � w•.r1WfATti 1,01® • ' x ri• W N]f ®Lew Na® +oree WxrMW1ELMl w � flL /' '! T N®!I MltK OIa OKAw•.rMRAT6 lTIpOO � � \�. WYrMRKBG 1rOlm i i FPO" X• rTOIM MlTK Ora lOfL OI9tWx4 .. wmm liT1E 1111I®! -rN TiT 04..M wLw MMTlO".m w•xrrmu=1101 w .. :.. ...e. . MOAIM VAGM WJ i i� &m*Lm- >— •KGNA! ' • �0 T!FII w NOCW - -y - ACNYLf sedJT tl _ - `y _ - - t r ��• — — W %O MWTGO TIQ7OD WxPNRAMMM / 3 w L !°nao Wxv,RA,6,101 .- llu000 nmTQRO°"NenLw acaN . ... 1• %Tasty .... . . �? n�io ar+ I- I I ■ 111 x r°°r I W"N= nnoa,! I I MFG! • OOICYI N �1 I Wiera.w v�YeNwe° I Il.r,.„„N�. Li ' IP - eGIE!!mi b�E"J -"6_ ,+tumcn QlLM � -- --- - - - - -- - - -- - - - - _ ma REAR ELEVATION _ — — — — a P IVUVW"ayrway. . Proposed Elevation 915.58 beet (AfGVD29) No.6124 Proposed c Proposed 1 6 Under the current code existing height = 27.5 ft, new code -neignt: ome would still conform to the over -all height requirement. t/c r r 911.`Bs; I ; r Co r v► ' r 915.1 30.0 ,P„dnrr o: 2 )of ridge 36.5 91.3.0 z °O. O P� Ei 112.0 .9 2 IL.T FENCING 1J.9 r i � REQUIRED ' n► r r r I r r r r r r r r m L •- w- -fir_ =� -ter RIDGEWAY ROAD 900.5 Proposed bituminous curb _� t/c 912.30 r_JJT J •'�� S 89 053' 54" W first ..'..�- ,.,..:....,;112:70` - C� x912.1 0 t�Q0S� I 913.25 t/c m cn 913.7 916 0 '� 91 .' 915.3 0 45 �, 9'S• 35. ` m . r-6 w � co � .- ', �:E ; m r 5'8� 512.4 NN �: - 916.0 ,, W a, ghtz °' ° !COO C co 0 o %� 5.2 `" R .t t/c ,. f 2'0 914.28 34'9' � PROP SEED � RESIDENCE 2'0' m h J�� 916.0 r .2 915.0 912. oJec _ x x913.2 d -� f'V'g N a y 146.00 S 89 056' 44" W o I A"' ' 10 a I Lot 1, Block/ 4, COUNTRYSOE Hennepin County, Minnesota �1r,6. I No. 6200 _� J8f4ridge r_JJT J first 917.27 floor r -rr- 914.28 t/c �� , Proposed Hard Cover Ca. Building area = 49 Lot Area = 26733 sq ft Percent of Hardcover = �n = rrr rn uuuun, �ar.�7,,r Vii...... Ei[m'm.11 ■. ■ ■E■ ■soon ■..' == WE nii; � Noon :soi � r: ■so. ■Soon ■soon ■so■ ■soon uu.ni. _�.� �so�- r_.so■ ISO Soso Igo soon ...I...l _= arrnrr.� I I I ll . c.r...un :� I., 1.t �.w■ ■so■ ■.■ I�II�I �:I�IL�JI�I ■ M W x A Per Aolannent Alb. 6402641 N01020'12 "E' WVM 0 - -- —I S117 9 Road .CBI Q R� V® `0 17.804 11 0 E I Driveway 't I . ; 1 I � 15.00 13'9' ... ...... ._ . ........ ... .t........p I . QQ 4400W 1 I Y i I T -310' 4 ® Cae! I 0 0 ��CC 9lW yp 95 `' I la•cro I•I 1I 84• W W 5•IPN T -3'4• O c'5 UO ea'r 1 Z N _ I I . ds W \ yp �66../ •, 140' x 7( j.� 5:...... 54'4• b 15.00 .... .. ........ Y..... . 4. % vi ® Dec! Parch di i nOC 0 - x 1O I r_ I 3 O V) (` V x x� ' S ` -i- v c ; rn rn i `S i Ul rn -� x I v O -U G / i rn rn I �n /5 Orauiagc * � i 5 C1 UMdy F�xrrlent � � `►' Per Uo�aimenl I MD. 0776960 o u T_ oa 1_g@11 V Under the current code existing height 30 ft, new code eig t: 33.3 ft, t a ome would have to be 3.3 ft shorter. The setbacks would not change. It should be noted that even with the lot division, the property is still extremely large. The home is well within setback and coverage. W o �x �• x g� CO Y 0 O e = CO W .p .p 0 Per Aolannent Alb. 6402641 N01020'12 "E' WVM 0 - -- —I S117 9 Road .CBI Q R� V® `0 17.804 11 0 E I Driveway 't I . ; 1 I � 15.00 13'9' ... ...... ._ . ........ ... .t........p I . QQ 4400W 1 I Y i I T -310' 4 ® Cae! I 0 0 ��CC 9lW yp 95 `' I la•cro I•I 1I 84• W W 5•IPN T -3'4• O c'5 UO ea'r 1 Z N _ I I . ds W \ yp �66../ •, 140' x 7( j.� 5:...... 54'4• b 15.00 .... .. ........ Y..... . 4. % vi ® Dec! Parch di i nOC 0 - x 1O I r_ I 3 O V) (` V x x� ' S ` -i- v c ; rn rn i `S i Ul rn -� x I v O -U G / i rn rn I �n /5 Orauiagc * � i 5 C1 UMdy F�xrrlent � � `►' Per Uo�aimenl I MD. 0776960 o u T_ oa 1_g@11 V Under the current code existing height 30 ft, new code eig t: 33.3 ft, t a ome would have to be 3.3 ft shorter. The setbacks would not change. It should be noted that even with the lot division, the property is still extremely large. The home is well within setback and coverage. �� � � i -�. FAR — Median Averages for Recently Built Homes LOGISMap Output Page 13704 1 3700 5504 ssos 5512 5520 , 67TH Sr W 5700 5701 *175701 570, 5700 13 a � ® 5705 5705 5704 Ns casmw+nMdNS. C-V'ga(C! 64GtSCA4m Page, l of 1 65TH ST w 3333 3328 3325 3321 3332 3328 3324 3320 $701 5700 5705 5704 F• R SVC-107 C NaUJA �V 11311 S, F 46m c coVIX bt bd1 541-1 Chowav\, -910 � S- F NOME CAS gQ i L'T 56THSTW- - -- j. '5601 5600 ..'lq 5605 3� 5604 S` 5m . r ( 5608 r 5613 I 1 5612 i�5617 1 �1 5616 5621 :. 5620 1� r 0 5625 .� 5624 i� 5628 r— A 5628 } 3633 f' .� 5632 rQ 5637 0 $636 .r J 5641 J $701 5700 5705 5704 F• R SVC-107 C NaUJA �V 11311 S, F 46m c coVIX bt bd1 541-1 Chowav\, -910 � S- F NOME CAS gQ i L'T LOGISMap Output Page 5809 5808 5813 5812 5817 5816 5821 5300 5301 5900 5904 b7 59os . 01 5912 7 5916 f / 5312 5304 ` �0 5300 to 5208 5204 5200 X rI� 5216 5212 BEWC T AYE 5215 a O ` 5213 • ` 6 5209 24 5205 ` „ 10� 5201 l 58TH ST w 5905 5117 5113 5904 m .�a A 5116 5112 5909 5906 5913 5912 O • 0 r 5917 5915 17 5921 5212 5208 5204 5200 5109 5121 40TH S7 w (� 600;]3 6000 5313 5309 5305 5301 5113 5209 5205 5201 6005 6004 ' 6008 6009 3308 5304 5300 ' Mm W.mAIcA1S Car-ycC; _OGrS G7S 2005 0= �i r� Co .w '� g0 t NOVA C /'� S, q 3 1 S. r loo AC c. A/ I Page I of I l 58TH ST w 5121 5117 5113 5109 m A 5116 5112 5108 5120 5117 5115 5109 5121 5120 5116 5112 5108 54TH ST w sf25 5121 5113 sir 5124 5120 5116 5112 5106 6001 6000 0 6005 6004 6009 6008 6012 —1 F �i r� Co .w '� g0 t NOVA C /'� S, q 3 1 S. r loo AC c. A/ LOGISMap Output Page Page I of I � 6025 6021 6017 6013 6009 6005 6908 6909 5813 'T 6912 % 2 5809 6004 mm 5920 5912 44:1�a 5900 5820 5816 5812 5808 6005 0q 1 l( .10 6001 70TH ST w 7001 7000 7000 70 7001 5905 17 7005 7004 7008 It i 0 a a 7017 7009 7016 7012 .16 7000 t S 7013 •a r �P Q 7021 70160' . `, 7020 7019 7101 7020 7021 7024 7012 7023 8 p'ts 7101 /1) 7105 7 �+�c�ay.:,�c+ds coq. +c�.acascszros e l000 A)UTO I m } CO4 a� 71 qX i-.1 s,*': HoPlE 6U'L7 LOGISMap Output Page Page I of I ! I 4100 � 4f01 Vmoond•wmNdNS- Casr,g ;C1= 4GSG-6M FAR M -cs A- a 4065. RA G , a3 � s. � 14 OWIC Cov(� 6t 0v i ,ego 3,13% a r . 40ME tj As BUILT) ' .40TH Sr w • 4001 b 4000 4000 aj ,d 4001 .4000 IS 3 4003 .a • 4002 4004 3.7 �l . T7 .4003 4008 - .1 3 4009 /. 4005,1 ' -`.! - �.A 4004 4010 40f 1 I 4006 a 3 4007 -°13 4008 - 2 ,� ,31 4011 4012 . .33 4016 a� 4020 4075 4017. ,r '°4 a� 4013 ([ 4008 .34 4014 '36 a � .4015 4010 ,� 3 4016 39 l A ;X 4017 4016 -,' 4018 p 4019 4020 4020 �+ / 1(. 4021 4622 4022 -'3 4024 4023 4024 4028 4025 ! I 4100 � 4f01 Vmoond•wmNdNS- Casr,g ;C1= 4GSG-6M FAR M -cs A- a 4065. RA G , a3 � s. � 14 OWIC Cov(� 6t 0v i ,ego 3,13% a r . 40ME tj As BUILT) LOGISMap Output Page Page 1 of 1. 4� x 5116 5109 5708 • �O 5115 6 5112 . 3 0 5113 5120 5113 5114 I 5117 5118 I� J Sff7 51 1 5121 51 5124 5117 5116 5121 5120 O 1 1 p m 3.124 � 5915 . '1 C of o 5125 a 5128 5121 5120 a� .q3 �1 5129 I �" 5128 ' j / t b (1 129 5132 .20 5115 5124 • . _5133 .s5 5132 1 / 5133 1 51. 5138 43 '� 7 129 5128 • I {r a,I 5137 `�• 5136 •1� $137 x?, 513 52ND S7 W 4207 1 4201 5209 5217 5221 5225 5229 52JJ 24 Ml — ft+da•z+&.WS Cm�-:gt!C: _OG49 G6 N06 5200 I O 5204 (�p 5208 5212 • t q 5216 IS� 5220 .0% 5224 tit 5228 1 5232 all FA COU14 be b�,li- Af ,201 i�a�t�So Ail A 3 S O+ Bu +z 1 I. LOGISMap Output Page Page 1 of.I f 4,a)"A CROCKEt oil, — Medlgv FAR 2,a0- f.r. Rome- ctvll h tv* at" q.�l� CfcCktf 1 LOGISMap Output Page •. s a . Dq — mdia h 412% WSSTRIOCE Page I of I 1 621 FAR a,4S� s,F t�otni � c��id 4� ��3 � � 3wS s.F �a�e was �► LOGISMap Output Page Page 1 of 1 r w , 41, 11101 RIDGE Rd. .1a = nnejigv% FAR 490000 s,F. Nome- co JA be Gilt i+ VI-7 Ratie. �`� �- 7,91 5,. aUit-T O� e �� to ,�roRPORP`�O • ieee REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item # III.C. From: CHERYL ENGELMAN Consent El CITY SANITARIAN Information Only F-1 Date: MAY 15, 2007 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: ORDINANCE AMENDMENT ® Motion 2007 -10 CONSTRUCTION ❑ Resolution NOISE ® Ordinance ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Grant first reading to the attached noise ordinance amendment which 1) eliminates the current construction noise exemption from daytime noise standards, and 2) reduces weekday and weekend hours of operation for construction noise. INFORMATIONBACKGROUND: At the. May 1 Council meeting, Council directed staff to draft an amendment to City Code Section 1040 — Noises Disturbing the Public Peace to 1) eliminate the current exemption of construction noise during daytime hours, 2) establish reduced hours of operation for construction noise on weekdays to 7am -9pm and weekends to 8am -7pm, and 3) establish a maximum 85 decibel limit for construction noise at the property line. The current ordinance exempts construction noise from daytime decibel limits and allows construction noise from lam — IOpm daily. The proposed amendment eliminates the exemption thereby requiring construction noise to comply with state standards. It also provides reduced hours of operation for construction noise on weekdays and weekends. Research by the City Attorney indicates that it may not be lawful for local government to establish standards more stringent than state standards and therefore the proposed amendment does not include language reflecting the maximum 85 decibel limit at the property line. ORDINANCE NO. 2007 -10 CITY OF EDINA HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 1040 OF THE EDINA CITY CODE CONCERNING NOISE DISTURBING THE PUBLIC PEACE THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ORDAINS: SECTION 1. Section 1040.01 of the Edina City Code is amended to read: 1040.01 Regulations Adopted; Measurement of Sound Levels. Subd. 1. M.P.C.A. Regulations Adopted. There is hereby adopted and incorporated herein by reference as part of this Section, the Noise Pollution Control Regulations of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, Air Quality Division,, Minnesota Rules }Chapter 70X ( "Regulations ' _______ SECTION 2. Section 1040.02 of the Edina City Code is amended to provide as follows: 1040.02 Prohibited Noise. No person shall make, continue, or cause or allow to be made or continued, any noise which exceeds the standards set forth in the Regulations. The foregoing prohibition shall not apply to the following conditions: A. Noises necessary for the protection or preservation of property or of the health, safety, life or limb of a human being; B. The operation of motor vehicles on public highways, locomotives and railroad cars, maintenance of utility easements or parks or snow removal by the City, County or State; Deleted: published as Deleted: 1991, Deleted: I Deleted: , except as amended by Subd. 2 ofthis Subsection '� Deleted: Subd. 2. Measurement of Acceptable Sound Levels. Section 7010.0600 of the Regulations is amended to read as follows:¶ A. _ A measurement procedure approved by the Sanitarian shall be used to determine the acceptability of sound levels in a given area. Such measurements shall be made using the following guidelines:9 I 1.. if the noise emanates from a place other than a building or structure, then the measurement shall be made at the point of human activity in the receiving area which is the nearest the noise source and which is typical for the noise area classification category of the receiving area, except where existing barriers, obstructions or reflecting surfaces prevent an accurate measurement; and$ 1 2.. If the noise emanates from a building or structure, then the measurement shall be made from the property line of the property on which the building or structure is situated.1 9 Deleted: I C.. Construction equipment at construction sites during daytime hours.I Deleted:, between the hours of 10:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M Deleted: O Deleted: O SECTION 3. Section 1040.03 of the Edina City,Code is amended to read: 1040.03 Hourly Restrictions on Certain Operations. No person jshal) -: ___ _ _________________ _ _ _ _ __ A. Between the hours of 10:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M., jgperate a - snowmobile, minibike, all terrain vehicle, or other vehicle not licensed for travel on public streets, provided vehicles used by physically disabled persons as defined by M.S. 169.356, Subd. 2 are exempt from this. requirement. B. Between the hours of 10:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M.,pperate a_power lawn mower, power hedge clipper, power leaf blower, chain saw mulcher, garden tiller, edger, drill or other similar 131544v01 RNK:05/07/2007 maintenance equipment. Provided, however, i) the use of fairway and greens mowers and other motorized equipment used to maintain golf courses and publicly owned property, ii) the use of ........ Deleted: and snow removal equipment and iii) the use of ice rink maintenance equipment are exempt from this requirement. C. Between the hours of 10:00 P.M. and 7:00 A.M., collect garbage or refuse within 200 feet of Deleted: C a building used for residential purposes. D. , No person shall enga«e in or permit construction and repair activities involving the use of _ any kind of electric diesel or gas- powered motor vehicles or machine or other power equipment, audible beyond the property line of the property where the activity is occurring, except between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 9.00 p.m., Monday through Friday and 8:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Saturday, Sunday and holidays (New Year's Day. Memorial Day, Fourth of July, Labor Day, Thanksgiving and Christmas). SECTION 4. This ordinance shall take effect from and after its passage and publication. 131544v01 RNK:05 /07/2007 Deleted: Engage in or permit construction activities which produce any audible noise beyond the property line of the property where the activity is occurring, provided construction activities performed in public streets and highways by the City, the County, or the State are exempt from this requirement subject to the approval of the Manager. ADOPTED this day of , 2007, by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota. CITY OF EDINA BY: ATTEST: Gordon Hughes, City Manager 13154401 RNK:05 /07/2007 James B. Hovland, Mayor oY te TO: FROM: VIA: SUBJECT: DATE: lyll REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Mayor & City Council Wayne D. Houle, PE, City Engineer Gordon Hughes, City Manager. REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 May 15, 2007 AGENDA ITEM V. A. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Contract No. ENG 07 -7 Todd Park Neighborhood Improvements, Improvement Nos. BA -340, SS -433, WM -464, STS -445 Company 1. Hardrives, Inc. 2. Arnt Construction 3. Midwest Asphalt Corporation 4. C.S. McCrossan Construction, Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Hardrives, Inc. Amount of Quote or Bid $ 1,714,626.55 $ 1,746,991.73 $ 1,823,028.68 $ 1,838,280.60 $ 1,714,626.55 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for street and utility improvements throughout the Todd Park Neighborhood. The project includes reconstructing the existing roadways, rehabilitating the watermain and sanitary sewers, and upgrading the storm sewer systems. The project was ordered by the Edina City Council at the March 20, 2007, Public Hearing. This project will be funded by special assessments and respective utility funds. The _ Feasibility Study project cost estimate for the project is $2,625,000 (this included engineering and administration fees). Staff recommends awarding the project to Hardrives, Inc. The Recommended Bid is within udget not within budge Public Works - Engineering Department t John Wallin, Finance Director %. 1111 1/I V_-_ — lKereve . .. ..- G:\Engineering\Contract Numbers\2007 \ENG 07 -7 Todd Park Neighborhood Improvements\ADMIN \MISC\20070515 ENG 07 -2 RFP.doc o11e To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: BOB WILSON CITY ASSESSOR Date: MAY 15, 2007 Subject: REPORT BY BOARD OF APPEAL AND EQUALIZATION Information /Background: REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item VI.A Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ® Discussion There is nothing included in the packet. Mr. John Helling, Chair of the 2007 Board of Appeal and Equalization will give a verbal presentation. f �f 11� ow e Cn .f �bR�g TO: Mayor & Council Members FROM: Debra Man gen, City Clerk DATE: May 15, 2007 SUBJECT: RESOLUTION RECEIVING DONATIONS Recommendation: Adopt Resolution. Background: REPORURECOMMENDATION Agenda Item VI . B . ❑ Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends To HRA ❑ To Council Action ❑ Motion Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion In order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. For your consideration, Resolution No. 2007 -57 details the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments. RESOLUTION NO. 2007 ,57 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA City of Edina WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two- thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Donations to the Senior Center. Edina Community Foundation - $377.00 for a pedestal table Edina Community Foundation - $1,089.83 for meals for senior volunteer recognition Donation to the City of Edina: Pat Greer - 1976 original watercolor of Braemar Golf Course Clubhouse Donations to the Art Center. Gary Diamond $60 M. Litman/C. Mihalchick $ 60 Jennie Lanners $25 Colleagues of Calligraphy $100 Lori and David Hough $10 Ellen & M. Bendel - Stenzel $ 60 Cathy Carlson and family $10 Jean Adams $ 10 Donation to Centennial Lakes Park: Commerce Bank - $2,000 to sponsor the Sunday concert series Dated: May 15, 2007 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina, do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of May 15, 2007, and was recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_. City Clerk City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 o� e t� \NCORPOPA�/ IHHH TO: City Council Members FROM: Jim Hovland, Mayor DATE: May 15, 2007 SUBJECT: APPOINTMENT Recommendation: REPORURECOMMENDATION Agenda Item VI.C. ❑ Consent Information ❑ Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends To HRA To Council Action El Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion That Alice Hulbert be appointed to serve on the Bike Edina Task Force. To: Mayor & City Council From: Mike Siitari, Police Chief Cl� Date: May 15, 2007 Subject: Resolution #2007 -59 Promoting the Use of Intrastate Mutual -aid Agreements. KE1'UK'1 1KEC:UMMEN VATIUN Agenda Item VI.D. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Action ❑ To Council Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adopt Resolution #2007 -59, Promoting the Use of Intrastate Mutual -Aid Agreements. Info/Background: The Minnesota Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management has requested that cities adopt the resolution in order to better prepare for major disasters or acts of terrorism. We currently have mutual aid agreements within Hennepin County but the changing landscape in Emergency Management indicates that a broader approach may be more beneficial in a time of crisis. The resolution would allow key city officials to dispatch equipment and personnel when it would be impractical for the City Council to authorize the assistance due to time constraints. If no formal agreements are in place at the time assistance is sent to another city, Chapter 12 of Minnesota State Statute provides the framework for legal authority and responsibility. CITY OF EDINA RESOLUTION #2007 -59 PROMOTING THE USE OF INTRASTATE MUTUAL —AID AGREEMENTS City of Edina J WHEREAS, Chapter 12, Section 12.331 allows for Intrastate Mutual Aid, and direct, timely assistance between jurisdictions is critical; and WHEREAS, the possibility of the occurrence of natural and other disasters of major size and destructiveness exists and is increasing; and WHEREAS, there is a need to ensure that preparations of the City of Edina will be adequate to deal with disasters; generally protect the public peace, health, and safety; and preserve the lives and property of the people of the state; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to provide for the rendering of mutual aid among the political subdivisions of the state and to cooperate with.the federal government with respect to carrying out emergency management functions; and WHEREAS, it is the policy of Minnesota that all emergency response functions of this state be coordinated to the maximum extent with the comparable functions of the state government, including its various departments and agencies, of other states and localities, and of private agencies of every type, to the end that the most effective preparations and use may be made of the state's labor supply, resources, and facilities for dealing with any disaster that may occur; and WHEREAS, the director of each local organization for emergency management may, in collaboration with other public and private agencies within this state, develop or cause to be developed mutual —aid arrangements for reciprocal emergency management aid and assistance in an emergency or disaster too great to be dealt with unassisted. These arrangements must be consistent with the local emergency operations plan and, in time of emergency, each local organization for emergency management and its members shall render assistance in accordance with the provisions of the mutual —aid arrangements; and NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the City of Edina promotes the efficiency and effectiveness of intrastate mutual aid by designating the City Manager, Police Chief, Fire Chief, Public Works Director, or other officer or designee who, exercising discretion and considering the needs of the political subdivision and its inhabitants, to dispatch equipment and personnel as considered necessary if a danger of fire, hazard, casualty, or another similar occurrence exists outside the political subdivision and by its suddenness it would be impractical for the governing body of the City of Edina itself to authorize the dispatch of equipment and personnel to combat that emergency or disaster. Adopted by the City of Edina on this 15th day of May, 2007 Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com James B. Hovland, Mayor 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 -826 -0379 01 L%W REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Boyd Tate Traffic Safety Coordinator Date: May 15, 2007 Subject: Traffic Safety Staff Review for May 2, 2007. Recommendation: Agenda Item: VI.E Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Review and approve Traffic Safety Staff Review of Wednesday, May 2, 2007. Info /Background: It is not anticipated that residents will be in attendance at the Council meeting regarding any of the attached issues. G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee \Staff Review Summaries \07 TSAG & W05 -02 -07 doc TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW Wednesday, May 2, 2007 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on May 2, 2007. Staff present included the City Engineer, Assistant City Engineer, City Planner, Traffic Safety Coordinator and Chief of Police. From that review, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were also informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the May 15, 2007 Council Agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which staff recommends approval: None for May 2, 2007 meeting. SECTION B: Requests on which staff recommends denial of request: Request for additional child advisory signs at Tingdale Park. Request comes from an employee (Nanny) of a resident on Tingdale Avenue across from Tingdale Park. She is concerned with the safety of children walking to and from the park. Tingdale Park is located on the west side of Tingdale Avenue between Benton Avenue and W. 591h Street. There have been no reported accidents in this area in the past 5 years. A child advisory sign currently exists on the north end of the park alerting southbound drivers on Tingdale Avenue. A park sign is also located on the southeast corner of the park that alerts northbound drivers. These signs are highly visible due to excellent sight lines. Staff feels that the park is adequately marked with child advisory signs and that additional signs are not needed. Traffic Safety Staff Review May 2, 2007 Page 1 of 2 ti- Staff recommends denial of request to add additional child warning signs in the area of Tingdale Park. SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others. Request for restricted parking on W. 62 "d Street and Beard Place, adjacent to Strachauer Park, during park events. Request deferred for further study. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 2 of 2 May 2, 2007 1-4 1Le Aci ,� ly REPORURE C OMMENDATI ON To: Mayor Hovland and members of Agenda Item VI. F. the Edina City Counciirt From: John Keprios, Direc Consent Park & Recreation Dent I nformation Only ❑ Date: May 15, 2007 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Gymnasium Construction Change Motion Order ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of a $486.00 change order from St. Paul Linoleum & Carpet Company as part of the gymnasium construction project. INFO/BACKGROUND: Gymnasium Construction Manager Kraus Anderson and staff recommend that the City Council approve a $486.00 change order for St. Paul Linoleum & Carpet Company to install VCT flooring at the South View Middle School elevator that serves the new gymnasium. Previous change orders collectively exceed 10% of their contract, which demands that all subsequent change orders require City Council approval. According to Kraus Anderson, this is anticipated to be the last change order for the project that requires Council approval. With this final change order, the total project costs are anticipated to be approximately $44,000 under budget. 5/1/2, 5:36:24 Page - 1 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES COMMUNICATIONS 106.73 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF, 296489 51`312007 Council Check Register 5/312007 -- 5/3/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 296488 5/3/2007 100612 A.M. LEONARD 175.00 21.49 PICK UP TOOL 00002390 159525 0224617900028 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 85.24 POST PULLER 00002396 159801 0224349101010 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/1/2, 5:36:24 Page - 1 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES COMMUNICATIONS 106.73 296489 51`312007 101833 A.T.O.M. 175.00 AGENCY MEMBERSHIP 159803 042707 1400.6104 175.00 296490 5/3/2007 100613 AAA 864.88 PLATES FOR 22.114 159802 042607 1553.6260 864.88 PLATES FOR 22.115 159802 042607 1553.6260 864.88 PLATES FOR 22.116 159802 042607 1553.6260 2,594.64 296491 5/3/2007 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 67.96 159675 608325 5842.5515 32.12 159676 608324 5822.5515 100.08 296492 5/3/2007 100616 ACTION MAILING SERVICES INC. 311.24 MAIL PROCESSING 159727 204960 5910.6103 311.24 296493 5/3/2007 120971 ADAMSON INDUSTRIES CORP. 179.95 CHARGER CENTER CONSOLE 159804 67689 1400.6215 179.95 296494 5/3/2007 102128 AEARO CO. 90.00 SAFETY GLASSES 00005189 159526 03436574 1301.6610 90.00 296495 51312007, 120904 ALCORN BEVERAGE CO INC. 124.50 159571 494157 5822.5514 124.50 296496 51312007 102715 ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING 133.13 RECEPTION PROGRAMS 159646 65347. 1500.6406 133.13 296497 51312007 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC. 240.08 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 159647 ALERTINVO8459 2210.6406 5/1/2, 5:36:24 Page - 1 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES COMMUNICATIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 799.49 CITY OF EDINA 159527 041907 47042.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COURTNEY BALL FIELD #4 Council Check Register 799.49 51312007 -513/2007 Check # Date - Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No - Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 240.08 296498 5/3/2007 159872 103957 AMERICAN VAN EQUIPMENT INC. 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 394.76 STORAGE SYSTEMS 00005878 159648 318575 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 394.76 296502 5/3/2007 296499 5/312007 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 794.62 FOOD 159871 745888 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 3264 5913.6103 794.62 DISTRIBUTION 296500 5/3/2007 120451 ARMSTRONG TORSETH SKOLD & RYDE 5/1/2007 15:36:24 Page - 2 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GRILL 799.49 ARCHITECTIENGINEERING 159527 041907 47042.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COURTNEY BALL FIELD #4 799.49 296501 5/3/2007 101954 AUGIE'S INC. 42.06 FOOD 159872 19730 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 42.06 296502 5/3/2007 119206 AZTECA SYSTEMS INC. 3,995.00 LICENSE FOR CITYWORKS 00005909 159528 3264 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 3,995.00 296503 5/3/2007 100642 BANNERS TO GO 434.52 BANNERS 00005979 159529 23810 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 434.52 296504 5/3/2007 116151 BCA - BTS 225.00 INTOXILYZER OPERATOR CLASS 159805 4077734 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL. 225.00 296505 5/312007 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 88.06 159572 42869300 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 191.36 159573 42869400 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,337.70 159574 40408500 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,486.70 159575 40625700 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 329.60 159576 40625600 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 6.05 159758 42881800 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 3,439.47 296506 513/2007 119213 BENTLEY, MACHELL 76.87 UNIFORM PURCHASE 159806 042507 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 76.87 1 r 15,000.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS CITY OF, 113.60 ACCUMULATOR 00005498 159729 Council Check Register 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 172.25 TUBE 5/3/2007 -5/3/2007 970138 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 296507 5/3/2007 REPAIR PARTS 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 464.11 47.91 PAPER 00008024 159530 OE- 108268 -1 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 238.60 OFFICE SUPPLIES 159531 WO- 449414 -1 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1305.6710 55.50 ENVELOPES 159532 OE- 107722 -1 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1305.6710 114.39 HEADSET 159533 WO- 449270 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 21.70 PENS 00005995 159534 WO- 448426 -1 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 63.88 INK CARTRIDGES 00001124 159728 WO- 448855 -1 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5410.6235 25.24 CUSTOM STAMP 159807 IN -10757 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 5422.6530 28.44 CUSTOM STAMP 159808 IN -10755 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 5430.6513 595.66 30.00 PETTY CASH 159874 042607 296508 513/2007 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 100711 BLOOD, DAVID 40.92 PETTY CASH 159874 042607 511/2. 5:36:24 Page - 3 Business Unit ARENA ADMINISTRATION FINANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 159640 050307 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 296509 513/2007 119631 BONNER & BORHART LLP 15,000.00 PROSECUTING 159873 31428 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GOLF ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GOLF REVENUES GOLF BALANCE SHEET 15,000.00 296510 5/312007 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 113.60 ACCUMULATOR 00005498 159729 976643 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 172.25 TUBE 00005663 159730 970138 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 178.26 ALTERNATOR 00005678 159731 976748 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 464.11 296511 513/2007 120798 BOYER TRUCKS LAUDERDALE 68,337.00 TRUCK CHASSIS 00004181 159908 S72595 1305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 68,337.00 TRUCK CHASSIS 00004181 159909 572594 1305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 136,674.00 296512 5/3/2007 100663 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 5.10 PETTY CASH 159874 042607 5410.6235 POSTAGE 21.32 PETTY CASH 159874 042607 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 21.72 PETTY CASH 159874 042607 5430.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 30.00 PETTY CASH 159874 042607 5410.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 40.92 PETTY CASH 159874 042607 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 44.00 PETTY CASH 159874 042607 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS 87.79 PETTY CASH 159874 042607 5400.2072 MEN'S CLUB 250.85 296513 5/3/2007 100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GOLF ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GOLF REVENUES GOLF BALANCE SHEET R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/1/2007 15:36:24 Council Check Register Page - 4 5/3/2007 -5/3/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 457.95 EMACO 00005884 159535 11625675.00 1375.6530 REPAIR PARTS PARKING RAMP 50.69 GEL PATCH, TIE WIRE . 00005884 159536 11625628 -00 1375.6530 REPAIR PARTS PARKING RAMP 211.40 SPRAYERS, HOSES, 00005887 159649 11625750 -00 1301.6556 - TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 720.04 296514 5/3/2007 100776 BUTLER, GEORGE 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 159639 050307 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 296515 51312007. 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 2,489.85 159677 17180 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 28.70 159678 17178 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 736.25 159679 67114 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,254.80 296516 5/3/2007 120964 CASK WINE CO. 375.40 159759 1250 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 375.40 296517 5/3/2007 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 333.00 159577 47327 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 736.00. 159578 47317 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 67.00 159680 47328 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,136.00 296518 5/312007 100681 CATCO 192.38 COUPLERS 00005680 159732" 3 -26630 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 192.38 296519 5/3/2007 102372 COW GOVERNMENT INC. 48.61 AV ROOM DVD & RW DRIVE 00004390 159650 DNJ7297. 2210.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COMMUNICATIONS 57.23 BGC SERVER REPLACEMENT HDD 00004390 159650 DNJ7297 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 57.23 CENTRAL PC REPLACEMENT HDD 00004390 159650 DNJ7297 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 205.15 MONITOR 00004390 159650 DNJ7297 5610.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION 206.88 IT WORKROOM MONITOR 00004390 159650 DNJ7297 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 575.10 296520 5/312007 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 148.97 5596524 -8 159537 4/16/07 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 6,614.67- 55914584 159538 APR1907 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 10.32 5590919 -6 159733 AP1907 7413.6582 FUEL OIL PSTF FIRE TOWER 6,773.96 t i R55CKREG LOu20000 CITY OF L 511/21 !.36:24 Council Check Register Page - 5 5/3/2007 -- 5/3/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit . 296521 5/3/2007 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 99.00 159681 336171 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 296522 5/3/2007 120972 CMMG INC. 2,832.00 ERT AMMO 159809 2735 2,832.00 296523 5/3/2007 101.323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 92.47 GLOVES 00005898 159539 03032340 92.47 296524 513/2007 102596 CROWN TROPHY 243.57 PLAQUES 00006177 159875 11763 243.57 296525 5/3/2007 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 71.50 159579 406379 2,548.05 159580 406378 2,524.35 159682 407315 19.80 159683 407316 825.00 159684 407312 19.80 159685 407313 26.40 159686 407314 6,034.90 296526 5/3/2007 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 2.50 WRENCH 00001311 159734 4375 178.92 SOCKET SETS, RATCHET 00005681 159735 4397 181.42 296527 5/3/2007 105930 DELL MARKETING L.P. 3,152.40 MONITORS 00004398 159540 V07720635 3,152.40 296528 5/3/2007 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 36.63 BAKERY 159876 243682 86.48 BAKERY 159877 243958 54.39 BAKERY 159878 243959 26.57 BAKERY 159879 244103 89.86 BAKERY 159880 244171 1401.6551 1301.6610 5410.6406 5862.5515 5862.5514 5842.5514 5842.5515 5822.5514 5822.5515 5822.5515 1553.6556 1553.6556 1260.6710 5421.5510 5421.5510 5421.5510 5421.5510 5421.5510 AMMUNITION EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX TOOLS TOOLS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ENGINEERING GENERAL GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL 5/1/2007 15:36:24 Page - 1 6 Business Unit INSPECTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CLUB HOUSE ED ADMINISTRATION 6 142 35 LEGAL 159541 1396848 1195.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES 6,142.35 296533 5/3/2007 100739 EAGLE WINE 2,334.32 159581 577680 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CITY OF EDINA 68.80 R55CKREG LOG20000 577679 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING, 7,33 159583 720180 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE. YORK SELLING 2,750.57 Council Check Register 581311 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 261.75 159688 5/3/2007 -5/3/2007 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 293.93 296529 51312007 102812 DEPARTMENT OF. LABOR & INDUSTRY 50.00 ELECTRICAL INSPECTION FORMS 159736 042607 1495.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS 50.00 296530 5/3/2007 118375 DEPAUL LETTERING 13.50 JACKET LETTERING 159810 2236 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 13.50 296531 5/3/2007 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST 132.60 159913 309616351 5511.6188 TELEPHONE 635.53 159913 309616351 5430.6188 TELEPHONE 4,029.00 159913 309616351 5420.6188 TELEPHONE 469.77 159914 309616305 5610.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 5,266.90 296532 5/3/2007 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 5/1/2007 15:36:24 Page - 1 6 Business Unit INSPECTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CLUB HOUSE ED ADMINISTRATION 6 142 35 LEGAL 159541 1396848 1195.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES 6,142.35 296533 5/3/2007 100739 EAGLE WINE 2,334.32 159581 577680 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 68.80 159582 577679 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING, 7,33 159583 720180 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE. YORK SELLING 2,750.57 159687 581311 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 261.75 159688 581317 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1 321 86 159917 581322 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6,729.97 296534 5/3/2007 119716 EASTERN PACIFIC APPAREL INC. 1,288.32 MERCHANDISE 159881 364621 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 32.08 MERCHANDISE 159882 366415 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,320.40 296535 5/312007 120967 EBSEN, JENNA 90.00 SWIMMING CLASS REFUND 159883 042307 1600.4390.17 SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETERS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 90.00 296536 5/3/2007 120948 EDDINGTON'S 192.22 "FOOD FOR WORK SESSION. " 159737 76670 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 192.22 1 f , R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF . Council Check Register 5/3/2007 —5/3/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 296537 5/3/2007 101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 90.00 AUDITORIUM RENTAL - MEETING 159651 6028 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 90.00 296538 5/3/2007 102340 EDMUNDS, LIZ 203.10 159918 922 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 203.10 296539 51312007 106049 ENDRIZZI, MARY 78.86 VOLUNTEER LUNCH GIFTS 159811 042607 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 78.86 296540 513/2007 118120 ESCH CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY INC. 355.66 BLADES, WIRE WHEEL 00005873 159542 428378 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 355.66 296541 513/2007 100752 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. 1,908.48 MANHOLE COVERS 00005868 159812 KK1240 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,908.48 296542 51312007 102003 FASTSIGNS BLOOMINGTON 241.23 SIGNS 00002015 159543 190 -31355 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 241.23 296543 5/3/2007 120975 FITOL -HINTZ CONSTRUCTION INC. 51,409.25 PLAYGROUND IMPROVEMENTS 159907 APPL 1 47049.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 51,409.25 296544 51312007 105824 FLYING CLOUD ANIMAL HOSPITAL 72.67 K9 EXAM 159813 311172 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 72.67 296545 5/3/2007 119991 FORM MINNESOTA 550.00 ADVERTISING 00006175 159884 12886 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 550.00 296546 51312007 100760 FOWLER ELECTRIC 77.95 GASKET KIT, RING SET, VALVES 00005595 159738 63628500 .1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 77.95 296547 51312007 115314 GALAXY COMPUTER INC. 5/11/2 J:36:24 Page - 7 Business Unit PLANNING YORK SELLING SENIOR CITIZENS PARKING RAMP COLLECTION SYSTEMS CENTENNIAL LAKES ALDEN PK PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA 5/1/2007 15:36:24 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 8 5/312007 -5/3/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 14,608.68 ANNUAL MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 159566 1972A 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 14,608.68 296548 513/2007 119936 GLOBAL OAK 6,619.00 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 159567 413 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 919.00 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 159568 415 2210.6124 WEB. DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 7,538.00 296549 5/312007 100781 GRAFIX SHOPPE 323.00 MOTORCYCLE GRAPHICS 159814 52410 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 323.00 296550 51312007 120966 GRAGE, SUSAN 44.00 TENNIS LESSONS REFUND 159739 042407 1600.4390.02 TENNIS PROGRAM PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 44.00 296551 51312007 101103 GRAINGER, 99.61 PAINT BRUSHES, BATTERIES 00005921 159544 9343608809 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 363.27 WASHER PUMP 00006164 159815 9343970530 5424.6530 REPAIR PARTS RANGE 20.16 GEAR BOX 00006086 159816 9344113742 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 28.33 SUNSCREEN 00006086 159817 9344010971 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 511.37. 296552 513/2007 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC 483.00 159584 00018703 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 350.00 159689 00018704 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 833.00 296553 51312007 120201 GRANICUS, INC 779.00 WEB STREAMING 159545 3216 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 779.00 296554 51312007 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 783 75 159585 90337 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 159586 88568 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 301.25 159587 90336 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 109.75 1,194.75 296555 51312007 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 28.23 KNOCKOUT SEALS 00005867 159652 925070015 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 46.93 SCREWDRIVER SET 00005867 159652 925070015 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 142.71 WIRING DEVICES 00005766 169653 925070014 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROW R55CKREG LOU20000 CITY OF L 5/1/21 :36:24 Council Check Register Page - 9 5/3/2007 -5/3/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 31.44 PIPE HANGERS, ADAPTERS 00005909 159740 925201553 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 40.78 PIPE HANGERS, ADAPTERS 00005909 159740 925201553 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 290.09 296556 51312007 120965 GREENE, ROSEMARY 200.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 159741 042407 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 200.00 296558 5/3/2007 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 29.59 159588 577838 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 480.00 159589 578303 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 609.80 159590 577708 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,567.13 159591 577839 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 14.49- 159592 720163 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 211.25- 159593 719779 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 7.99- 159594 720018 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,289.88 159690 579927 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 81.91 159691 581326 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 527.34 159692 579328 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,520.18 159693 581198 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 609.80 159694 581197 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 462.29 159695 581319 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,058.27 159696 581321 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 16.00- 159697 720204 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4.95- 159698 720219 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2.70 159760 581039 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,353.12 159761 581313 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8,125.70 159762 581327 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,258.46 159763 581324 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 19.50- 159764 720566 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 7.00- 159765 720569 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 149.22- 159766 720337 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 510.61 159919 581855 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 24,056.38 296559 513/2007 101576 HEGGIES PIZZA 237.70 PIZZA 159818 169756 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 237.70 296560 5/3/2007 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 200.64 MEAT PATTIES 159819 020145 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 200.64 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 511/2007 15:36:24 Council Check Register Page - 10 513/2007 —5/3/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 296561 513/2007 103585 HENNEPIN COUNTY HOUSING DEPART 13,614.72 REHAB LOAN PAYBACK 159820 R -96-5 2101.4205 FEDERAL AID CDBG REVENUES 13,614.72 296562 513/2007 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 3,356.74 MARCH 2007 159821 001870 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES 3,356.74 296563 51312007 106371 HENNEPIN FACULTY ASSOCIATES 2,333.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 159645 050307 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,333.08 296564 5/312007 111615 HESTAD, ROBERT 70.00 PATRON CARD REFUND 159910 043007 5401.4531 MEMBERSHIPS GOLF REVENUES 70.00 296565 5/312007 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 5,709.16 MOBILE LAB FOR ADMIN 00004397 159569 42155191 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 874.20 PC & LCD 00004396 159570 42155548 1650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 2$9.68 ELECTRICIANS' PRINTER 00004389 159654 41870540 1552.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 309.92 PDA ADAPTERS 00004389 159654 41870540 1120.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ADMINISTRATION 564.49 FALL INTO THE ARTS PC 00004389 159654 41870540 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 7,747.45 296566 5/3/2007 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 301.50 159767 417450 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 786.75 159920 417453 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,088.25 296567 5/3/2007 119094 HUMANA DENTAL 237.30 DENTAL PREMIUM 159742 565864202 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 8,509.14 DENTAL PREMIUM 159742 565864202 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 8,746.44 296568 51312007 119857 ICMA 1,072.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 159885 192438 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 1,072.00 296569 5/3/2007 105894 INDUSTRIAL FLOOR MAINTENANCE 1 449.43 BROOMS 00005913 159546 22317 1310.6523 BROOMS STREET CLEANING A , 449.43 1 , R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF ► 511/2 ):36:24 Council Check Register Page - 11 5/3/2007 -5/3/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 296570 51312007 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY 38.34 TORPEDO LEVEL 00005932 159743 4097939 -01 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 253.36 LIGHTING 00005932 159743 4097939 -01 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 291.70 296571 513/2007 101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 159644 050307 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 296572 5/312007 100830 JERRY'S PRINTING 95.85 AQUATIC CENTER PASSES 159886 39670 5310.6575 PRINTING POOL ADMINISTRATION 95.85 296573 51312007 102146 JESSEN PRESS 713.70 AR & LE BOOKLETS 00007151 159744 633177011 1629.6575 PRINTING ADAPTIVE RECREATION 713.70 296574 513/2007 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 2,647.50 159699 1071840 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,767.80 159768 1071888 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 67.10 159769 1071889 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 171.00 159887 1074497 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 6,887.46 159921 1071897 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1.20- 159922 1003110 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 12,539.66 296576 51312007 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 392.17 159595 1244002 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 329.04 159596 1244000 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 203.24 159597 1243992 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,468.36 159598 1244005 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 593.00 159599 1243990 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 296.32 159600 1243988 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,976.35 159601 1243991 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 150.10 159602 1243989 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 96.08 CREDIT TAKEN TWICE 159603 334002 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4.955- 159700 341100 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 19.17- 159701 341134 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4.92- 159702 341135 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 254.72. 159770 1247215 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 483.35 159771 1247214 5862.5513 I COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 296577 51312007 296578 51312007 296579 5/312007 296580 5/3/2007 Amount Supplier/ Explanation 2,179.76 .36 1,488.97 93.99 33.07 95.26 679.76 74.16 222.11 357.43 1,178.81 97.99 187.00 1.08 .45 1,402.28 435.86 1,509.31 3,447.45 1.08 894.29 2,977.33 34.07 24,605.56 104297 K. BELL 88.89 MERCHANDISE 88.89 100553 KEEHR, GREGORY 91.69 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 91.69 104943 KEVITT EXCAVATING INC. 500.00 HYDRANT USAGE REFUND 500.00 101935 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC. 1,299.80 BATTERY PACKS 1,299.80 296581 51312r 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 159888 0645643 -IN 5440.5511 159912 042707 5862.6406 159655 052507 5901.4626 159822 311803 4601.6103 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5/1/2007 15:36:24 Page - 12 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GENERAL SUPPLIES SALE OF WATER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VERNON SELLING UTILITY REVENUES POLICE FORFEITURE CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/3/2007 -5/3/2007 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 159772 1247220 5862.5513 159773 1247205 5862.5512 159774 1247218 5862.5512 159775 1247217 5862.5515 159776 1247219 5862.5515 159777 1247221 5862.5512 159778 1247197 5822.5513 159779 1247196 5822.5513 159780 1247195 5822.5513 159781 1247200 5822.5512 159782 1247198 5822.5512 159783 1247199 5822.5515 159784 1242370 5842.5512 159785 1237217 5842.5512 159923 1247204 5842.5512 159924 1247206 5842.5512 159925 1247208 5842.5513 159926 1247211 5842.5512 159927 1247210 5842.5512 159928 1247202 5842.5513 - 159929 1247212 5842.5513 159930 1247207 5842.5513 159931 1247201 5822.5515 296581 51312r 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 159888 0645643 -IN 5440.5511 159912 042707 5862.6406 159655 052507 5901.4626 159822 311803 4601.6103 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5/1/2007 15:36:24 Page - 12 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GENERAL SUPPLIES SALE OF WATER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VERNON SELLING UTILITY REVENUES POLICE FORFEITURE ' R55CKREG LO20000 G CITY OF L Council Check Register 5/3/2007 -5/3/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 329.88 CONNECTORS, WING NUTS 00001125 159745 5522731 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 329.88 296582 5/312007 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 47.39 2007 DIRECTORY 159656 042307 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 47.39 296583 5/312007 100855 LESCO INC. 292.80 PAINT, LAPPING COMPOUND 00006499 159823 3F4FCB2B 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 292.80 296584 5/3/2007 106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC. 70.25 COPIER USAGE 00001512 159547 189367 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 70.25 296585 5/3/2007 100858 LOGIS 626.00 159657 28111 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 632.61 159657 28111 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING 13,822.43 159657 28111 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 144.00 159658 27919 46001.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 216.00 159658 27919 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 240.00 159658 27919 4608.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 15,681.04 296586 51312007 101453 LUTZ, RICHARD M. 246.93. UNIFORM PURCHASE 159889 043007 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 246.93 296587 51312007 120343 M DESIGN INTERACTIVE LLC 1,050.00 ONLINE INVOICING PROJECT 159659 032807 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT 1,050.00 296588 51312007 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 5/1/2 1:36:24 Page - 13 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS CENT SERV GEN - MIS FIBER OPTIC CABLING CENT SERV GEN - MIS POLICE COMPUTER SYSTEM POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS 2 413 97 159604 12309 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,413.97 296589 51312007 100868 MARK VII SALES 1,695.95 159605 180784 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,226.95 159703 181828 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 49.00 159704 181829 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,971.90 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/1/2007 15:36:24 Council Check Register Page - 14 5/3/2007 —5/3/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 296590 51312007 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 170.00 VOICE MAIL CHANGES 159548 36651 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 170.00 296591 513/2007 101146 MATRIX TELECOM INC. 216.95 159746 606199089 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 216.95 296592 51312007 103189 MEDICA 1,394.61 PREMIUM 159747 0009593109 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 7,766.32 PREMIUM 159747 0009593109 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 9,160.93 296593 51312007 103189 MEDICA 15,624.46 PREMIUM 159748 0009604782 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 15,624.46 296594 5/3/2007 103189 MEDICA 8,363.86 PREMIUM 159749 00009588140 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL' 71,916.60 PREMIUM 159749 C0009588140 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 80,280.46 296595 5/3/2007 103189 MEDICA 9,765.39 PREMIUM 159750 C0009590481 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 57,745.27 PREMIUM 159750 C0009590481 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 67,510.66 296596 5/3/2007 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 1,814.50 MILL POND MARKET TRIP 159824 042607 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 1,814.50 296597 513/2007 120970 MELLENTHIN, PATRICIA 50.00 TRIP REFUND 159825 042607 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 50.00 296598 5/3/2007 101483 MENARDS 115.11 SHELVING, BRACKETS 00005733 159549 18786 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 25.24 MAPLE BOARD 00005886 159550 ' 18719 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 112.26 PAINT, LINERS, BRUSHES 00005919 159751 19869 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKING RAMP 137.33 SPADE, PLIERS, ROPE 00006495 159826 20981 5431.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 389.94 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX CONTRACTED REPAIRS LICENSES & PERMITS POSTAGE GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/1Ye 5:36:24 Page - 15 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SVC PW BUILDING ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING DISTRIBUTION TRAINING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COLLECTION SYSTEMS 73.72 R55CKREG Luu20000 CITY OF, 296600 51312007 Council Check Register 5/3/2007 -5/3/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 296599 513/2007 101987 MENARDS 126.74 17.28 HOSE CLAMPS 00002399 159827 84311 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 56.44 BULBS 00002362 159828 71814 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX CONTRACTED REPAIRS LICENSES & PERMITS POSTAGE GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/1Ye 5:36:24 Page - 15 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SVC PW BUILDING ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING DISTRIBUTION TRAINING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COLLECTION SYSTEMS 73.72 296600 51312007 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 450.67 LPS I, LPS II, LPS 111 00005892 159551 71731 1553.6406 126.74 HOSE 00005580 159552 71719 1553.6406 731.18 SOAP, LINERS 00005799 159553 71717 1552.6511 970.11 LINERS, WYPALL 00008026 159554 71761 5511.6511 2,278.70 296601 513/2007 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAI 33.47 COVERS 00005493 159555 452616FOW 1553.6530 33.47 296602 51312007 116712 METROPOLITAN MEDIA GROUP INC. 335.33 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 159660 11259 5822.6122 335.33 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 159660 11259 5842.6122 335.34 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 159660 11259 5862.6122 1,006.00 296603. 513/2007 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA EAGAN 182.00 159606 0178411810 5822.5515 182.00 296604 513/2007 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,560.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 00005833 159829 32970 5913.6180 1,560.00 296605 5/3/2007 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 23.00 WATER LICENSE RENEWAL 159830 BART VOTH 5919.6260 23.00 296606 513/2007 100066 MINNESOTA MAILING SOLUTIONS 205.55 RATE INCREASE UPDATE 159831 43331 1400.6235 205.55 296607 51312007 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT 131.44 MANHOLE RING SEALANT 00005831 159832 0204095 5923.6406 131.44 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX CONTRACTED REPAIRS LICENSES & PERMITS POSTAGE GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/1Ye 5:36:24 Page - 15 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SVC PW BUILDING ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING DISTRIBUTION TRAINING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COLLECTION SYSTEMS CITY OF EDINA 5/1/2007 15:36:24 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 16 513/2007 -- 5/3/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 296608 5/3/2007 118066 MINNESOTA REVENUE 1,230.00 WO ANNUAL PERMIT FEE 00005834 159833 4400053753 5915.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS WATER TREATMENT 1,230.00 296609 5/3/2007 103240 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL 378.00 DEFENSIVE DRIVING CLASS 159834 019248 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 378.00 296610 5/3/2007 120604 MINT CONDITION DETAILING INC. 213.00 TRUCK CLEAN UP 00005933 159835 23977 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 213.00 296611 5/312007 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 1,019.78 FUNGICIDE 00002011 159556 562763 -00 5630.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,805.51 FUNGICIDE 00002017 159836 562768 -00 5630.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES 795.01 FERTILIZER 159837 562004 -00 5422.6540 FERTILIZER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 229.50 BUSHINGS, PULL FRAME 00006496 159838 564989-00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE &'GROUNDS 97.63 GREENSMOWER PULL FRAME 00006496 '159839 565007 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,001.27 FERTILIZER 159840 560782 -00 5431.6540 FERTILIZER RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 23.95- CREDIT 159841 565012 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 189.54 WASHERS, PINS, BOLTS 00006497 159842 565137 -00 - 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 6,114.29 296612 51312007 120968 NATIONAL TARGET COMPANY INC, T 118.96 PISTOL TARGETS 159752 57262 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 118.96 296613 5/3/2007 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 712.00 159607 43073 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 700.00 159608 43072 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,412.00 296614 51312007 101359 NIBBE, MICHAEL 102.30 NOTEBOOK COMPUTER MEMORY 159843 042407 4608.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE COMPUTER SYSTEM. 102.30 296615 5/3/2007 100724 NISSEN, DICK 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 159643 050307 100.00 296616 _ . 51312007 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 00006034 159890 383317040 - 001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRP' 39.49 LABELS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF, Council Check Register 5/3/2007 --5/3/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 39.49 296617 5/3/2007 102712 OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOG 435.86 159661 W07030569 5420.6188 TELEPHONE 20.27 ARNESON 159662 W07030562 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 40.54 GREENHOUSE 159662 W07030562 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 81.16 159662 W07030562 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 81.35 159662 W07030562 5311.6188 TELEPHONE 101.35 CARD ACCESS -PARKS 159662 W07030562 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 101.35 159662 W07030562 1550.6188 TELEPHONE 101.35 HISTORICAL 159662 W07030562 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 102.19 159662 W07030562 5861.6188 TELEPHONE 121.62 159662 W07030562 1481.6188 TELEPHONE 129.27 159662 W07030562 5210.6188 TELEPHONE 132.97 159662 W07030562 5111.6188 TELEPHONE 162.16 159662 W07030562 5841.6188 TELEPHONE 202.70 159662 W07030562 1622.6188 TELEPHONE 493.68 159662 W07030562 5610.6188 TELEPHONE 2,307.82 296618 5/3/2007 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 172.32 COIL CHAIN 00001126 159753 443077 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 172.32 296619 5/3/2007 120860 OLSSON ASSOCIATES 550.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 159557 98499 47051.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 550.00 296620 5/3/2007 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 161.32 COOKIES 159891 678872 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 161.32 296621 51312007 103624 P & L AUTOMOTIVE INC. 380.00 BEDLINER FOR TRUCK 159844 • 171235 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 380.00 296622 5/3/2007 111715 PALMETTO GSA MEDICARE 330.20 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 159754 RICHARD 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES TOMPKINS 330.20 296623 5/3/2007 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 5/1/2, 5:36:24 Page - 17 Business Unit CLUB HOUSE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY POOL OPERATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK FIRE STATION GOLF DOME PROGRAM ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT YORK OCCUPANCY SKATING & HOCKEY ED ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GARDEN PARK PATHWAY GRILL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 2,526.94 80.00- 135.00- 32.00 - 120.00 808.01 1,270.00 1,794.00 81.00 6,352.95 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 511/2007 15:36:24 Page - 18 Business Unit VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 296624 51312007 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/3/2007 -5/3/2007 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 159609 8143358 -IN 5862.5513 159610 8143577 -CM 5842.5513 159611 8143137 -CM 5822.5513, 159612 8143138 -CM 5862.5513 159705 8143684 -IN 5862.5513 159786 8144061 -IN 5822.5513 159787: 8144060 -IN 5862.5513 159788 8144062 -IN 5842.5513 159932 8144262 -IN 5842.5513 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 511/2007 15:36:24 Page - 18 Business Unit VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 296624 51312007 110832 PC2 SOLUTIONS INC. 420.00 TECHNICAL SERVICES 159558 42107003 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN -MIS 420.00 296625 5/312007 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 2,009.51 159613 2453907 ' 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,884.55 159614 2453908 5862.5513' . COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 977.74 159615 2453902 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 625.71 159616 2453900 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 266.64 159617 2453901 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 511.70- 159618 3359443 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 584.10- 159619 3359444 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 419.52 159706- 2454070 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,056.12 159707 2454394 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD,WINE VERNON SELLING 240.64. 159789 2456364 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,088.00 159790 2456355 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,359.57 159791 2456354 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,821.03 159792 2456363 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,586.24 159793 2456362 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING. 1,779.34 159933 2456361 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 988.37 159934 2456360 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 159935 2456357 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 355.00 159936 2456359 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8,543.44 159937 2456356 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 92.58 28,998.20 296626 51312007 111779 PIONEER RESEARCH CORPORATION GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 749.63 GEL STRIPPER 00001717 159663 192399 1314.6406 749.63 296627 5131' 102748 PIRTEK PLYMOUTH R55CKREG L.. 4000 CITY OF 5/1P. 5:36:24 Council Check Register Page - 19 5/3/2007 --5/312007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 221.21 HYDRAULIC HOSE 00006488 159845 S1083936.001 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 221.21 296628 5/3/2007 120949 POINTS OF VIEW INC. 1,500.00 CONSULTING - COMP PLAN 159559 4- 23- 2007 -01 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 1,500.00 296629 5/3/2007 101032 PRINT SHOP, THE 643.85 MAY NEWSLETTER 00008202 159846 123374 - 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 643.85 296630 5/3/2007 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY , 100.60 159620 577844 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 623.75 159708 581312 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 72.80 159709 581318 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 445.24 159794 581323 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,242.39 296631 5/3/2007 105690 PRO -TEC DESIGN INC. 692.04 REPLACE LOCKS 159847 49428 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 692.04 296633 5/3/2007 100971 QUALITY WINE 574.55 159621 847983 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,036.81 159622 847767 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 85.15 159623 848245-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 735.45. 159624 845475-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,184.45 159625 847313-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,886.47 159626 847766 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 133.24 159627 848942 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 6.85- 159628 847589-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 12.83- 159629 842162 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 13.33- 159630 842151 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 34,68- 159631 847316 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,079,27 159710 850227 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 433.20 159711 850800 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 66.65 159712 851141 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 841,20 159713 850041 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,895.26 159714 851133 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 291.10 159715 851190 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,435.65 159716 851136-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 863.89 159717 851241 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/1/2007 15:36:24 Council Check Register Page - 20 5/3/2007 -5/3/2007 1 U It Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description I Bus ness n 935.41 101109 RDO EQUIPMENT CO. 159718 851134 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 650.05 159719 _ 850284 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 81,15 172.24 159720. 850960 -00 5822.5513. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 559.50- 159721 847022 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 465.75 159795 851242 -00, 5862:5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD, WINE VERNON SELLING 70.55 100985 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQ CO INC 159796 851191 -00 .5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,027.13 159797 851140 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,152,18 159938 850043-00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 16.00- 042707 159939 848508 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING . 16.00- 5/3/2007 159940 849195-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 30.07- BAKERY 159892 159941 850645-00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 19,235.30 296640 51312007 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 296634 5/3/2007 101965 QWEST VAN VALKENBURG SUPPLIES 159893 042907 148.65 112.62 952 920 -8166 159664 81664/07 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 39.90 952 922 -9246 159848 92464/07 1400.6188 TELEPHONE - POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1553.6530 1553.6530 5420.6180 1305.6710 1400.6203 5421.5510 4075.5510 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLUB HOUSE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT UNIFORM ALLOWANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD t POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL VANVALKENBURG 152.52 296635 5/3/2007 101109 RDO EQUIPMENT CO. 31.39 KNIFE SHARPENING 00005927 159560 P12957 140.85 BEARING 00005679 159665 P18756 172.24 296636 5/312007 114340 .RIDGE DOOR SALES & SERVICE INC 129.95 GARAGE DOOR REPAIR 159849 35710 129.95 296637 5/312007 100985 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQ CO INC 17,551.20 TRAILER MOUNT /OIL DISTRIBUTOR00005430 159666 M01439 17,551.20 296638 5/312007 102040 RYGG, JAMES 52.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 159850 042707 52.99 296639 5/3/2007 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 37.80 BAKERY 159892 181732 37.80 296640 51312007 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 148.65 VAN VALKENBURG SUPPLIES 159893 042907 148.65 1553.6530 1553.6530 5420.6180 1305.6710 1400.6203 5421.5510 4075.5510 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLUB HOUSE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT UNIFORM ALLOWANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD t POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL VANVALKENBURG R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF. S/1/2, x.36:24 Council Check Register Page - 21 5/3/2007 —5/3/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 296641 5/3/2007 120973 SANFORD LP 106:40 MERCHANDISE 00006082 159894 2891231 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 106.40 296642 5/312007 104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC. 216.84 STAFF NAME PLAQUES 159667 38633 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 216.84 296643 5/3/2007 103249 SHANNON, JIM 125.00 PIANIST FOR VOLUNTEER EVENT 159668 042307 1500.6406. GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES 125.00 296644 51312007 102995 SHAPCO PRINTING INC. 511.20 EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER 159895 150403-01 2210.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 511.20 296645 5/3/2007 101585 SHORT, MICHAEL 63.95 ADAPTER CORD 159911 043007 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 63.95 296646 5/3/2007 102935 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION INC 198.00 ICE MAKER REPAIR 00006178 159899 59597 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL 198.00 296647 5/3/2007 116682 SPECIALTY WINES & BEVERAGES 138.50 159942 15087 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 138.50 296648 51312007 120974 SPORTCOVER INTERNATIONAL INC. 482.23 MERCHANDISE 00006429 159896 555034 6440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 639.67 MERCHANDISE 00006429 159897 554711 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,121.90 296649 51312007 116856 SPRINT 108.51 0585111160.4 DATA CARD 00005835 159851 041507 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 108.51 296650 5/3/2007 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC 2,460.15 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 00005779 159669 SM09249 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,460.15 R55CKREG LOG20000 703.30 WANT AD 00016102 CITY OF EDINA _ 972590 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL Council Check Register 513/2007 -5/312007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 296651 51312007 159642 100650 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 91.48 KEYS CORED 159898 MN- 441344 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 296656 91.48 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 296652 5/3/2007 101015 STREICHERS 37.00 BEER LINE CLEANING 159900 447181 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 85.15 FUSEE 159852 1429047 1400.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 4,776.05 SQUAD BUILD UP 159853 1428749 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 259.95- CREDIT 159854 CM218289 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 9- 555-029 -840 SUPPLIES 00006174 159901 1,547.56- CREDIT 159855 CM218278 1400.6551 AMMUNITION 19.17 3,053.69 296658 296653 5/3/2007 116344 TECH TEAM SOLUTIONS INC. 104349 STRUCTURED NETWORK SOLUTIONS 54112007 15:36:24 Page - 22 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 195 41 DESK WIRING 159670 12577 1495.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT INSPECTIONS 195.41 296654 5/3/2007 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 703.30 WANT AD 00016102 159755 972590 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 703.30 296655 5/3/2007 100794 SWANSON, HAROLD 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 159642 050307 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 296656 5/3/2007 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 37.00 BEER LINE CLEANING 159900 447181 5421.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 37.00 296657 5/312007 101027 TARGET 19.17 9- 555-029 -840 SUPPLIES 00006174 159901 041807 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 19.17 296658 513/2007 116344 TECH TEAM SOLUTIONS INC. 952.00 OFFICE MACHINE MAINTENANCE 159561 0002612 1550.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 952.00 296659 5/3/2007 112358 TEE'S PLUS 389.29 DARE ITEMS 159856 241533 1425.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DARE 389.29 296660 51312007 105177 THOMPKINS, RICHARD 195.39 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 159756 042507 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 195.39 R55CKREG LUU20000 CITY OF 511/1 5:36:24 Council Check Register Page - 23 5/3/2007 -5/3/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 296661 5/3/2007 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 3,335.00 159632 444006 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 104.00 159633 444256 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 656.00 159902 27217 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 4,095.00 296662 5/3/2007 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 500.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 159671 2007 -5802 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 500.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 159671 2007 -5802 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 500.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 159671 2007 -5802 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,500.00 296663 5/3/2007 103331 TILSNER, DONNA 100.00 VAN VALKENBURG - OPENING CASH 159903 042607 4000.1040 CHANGE FUND WORK CAP BALANCE SHEET 100.00 296664 5/3/2007 115854 TLC CAFE & CATERING 621.84 ERT TRAINING 159857 617151 1401.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAM 621.84 296665 5/3/2007 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 191.02 WELDING GAS 00005499 159562 164384 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 191.02 296666 5/3/2007 103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 33.74 WRENCH HANDLE 00005654 159563 25611 1330.6530 REPAIR PARTS TRAFFIC SIGNALS 33.74 296667 5/3/2007 101045 TURF SUPPLY COMPANY 71.51 SPIKE CLEANER BRUSH 00006481 159858 102577 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 71.51 296668 5/3/2007 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 875.43 SEED 00006494 159859 16288 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 875.43 296669 513/2007 103248 ULLRICH, CINDY 21.60 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 159904 042707 5610.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ED ADMINISTRATION 21.60 296670 51`3@007 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/3/2007 —5/312007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # _ Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 2,267.49 WATER MAIN REPAIR 00005832 159860 12048 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2,267.49 296671 5/3/2007 101338 VALLIERE, JOHN 42375 USGA CONFERENCE EXPENSE 159905 042607 5410.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS PAPER SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5/1/2007 15:36:24 Page - 24 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION GOLF ADMINISTRATION YORK SELLING GOLF DOME PROGRAM COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN RESERVE PROGRAM DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTED REPAIRS GOLF DOME PROGP •'4 423.75 296672 5/3/2007 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 447.39 BAGS 00007512 159672 034353-00 5842.6512 447.39 296673 513/2007 120976 VERIFONE 123.80 PHONE REPAIR 00006176 159906 7754906 5210.6180 123.80 296674 513/2007 119454 VINOCOPIA 174.00 159798 0003100 -IN 5822.5513 1,207.00 159943 0003098 -IN 5842.5513 1,381.00 296675 5/3/2007 102218 VINTAGE ONE WINES 1,214.10 159634 11132 5842.5513 1,214.10 296676 5/3/2007 120295 VOICE PLUS /ACTORS PLUS INC. 575.00 HOSTING FEE 159564 6144 2210.6103 575.00 296677 5/3/2007 106699 WALSER CHRYSLER JEEP 119.98 MAT KITS 00005671 159757 1333048CHW 1553.6530 119.28 296678 51312007 101080 WALSH, WILLIAM 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 159641 050307 1419.6102 100.00 296679 5/3/2007 100183 WASHINGTON COUNTY 100.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 159861 042607 1000.2055 100.00 296680 51312007 119730 WEB ELECTRIC 389.99 REPAIR OUTLET, ADD OUTLET 00006081 159862 1461 5210.6180 PAPER SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5/1/2007 15:36:24 Page - 24 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION GOLF ADMINISTRATION YORK SELLING GOLF DOME PROGRAM COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN RESERVE PROGRAM DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTED REPAIRS GOLF DOME PROGP •'4 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF L 5/1/21 :36:24 Council Check Register Page - 25 5/312007 -513/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,289.58 ELECTRICAL WORK 00006078 159863 1460 5420.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLUB HOUSE 157.02 INSTALL NEW OUTLET 159864 1462 5420.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CLUB HOUSE 1,836.59 296681 5/3/2007 103266 WELSH COMPANIES LLC 545.58 MAY 2007 MAINTENANCE 159673 050107 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 545.58 296682 5/3/2007 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 356.80 159635 164561 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,150.94 159636 164563 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 450.40 159722 165073-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 270.56 159723 165074 -00 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 658.43 159724 165171 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 823.49 159944 165049 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,710.62 296683 5/3/2007 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 285.82 159637 189290 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5.52- 159638 32971 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 667.89 159799 189933 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 850.47 159800 189931 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 629.19 159945 189932 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,427.85 296684 5/3/2007 112954 WISCONSIN TURF EQUIPMENT CORP. 19.25 BOLTS 00005609 159565 534115 -000 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 19.25 296665 513/2007 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 120.00 159725 193518 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 88.00 159726 193192 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 315.98 159946 193402 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 120.00 159947 193075 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 643.98 296686 5/312007 101726 XCEL ENERGY 37.81 51- 5276505 -8 159674 107521617 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 931.84 51- 5107681 -4 159865 108338895 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 160.96 51- 5005454 -3 159866 108336418 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 10,253.99 51- 6644819 -9 159867 108375097 5620.6185 LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,361.35 51- 6223269 -1 159868 108365832 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 52.24 51-6692497 -0 51.38 51- 4420190 -3 6,988.46 51-6955679 -8 10,788.36 51- 5605640 -1 30,626.39 108376552 759,399.19 Grand Total Subledger Account Description Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 759,399.19 Total Payments 759,399.19 LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 5/112007 15:36:24 Page - 26 Business Unit CIVILIAN DEFENSE STREET LIGHTING REGULAR CITY HALL GENERAL DISTRIBUTION CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/3/2007 —5/312007 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 159869 108376552 1460.6185 159870 108322402 1321.6185 159915 108689987 1551.6185 159916 108418028 5913.6185 Subledger Account Description Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 759,399.19 Total Payments 759,399.19 LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER 5/112007 15:36:24 Page - 26 Business Unit CIVILIAN DEFENSE STREET LIGHTING REGULAR CITY HALL GENERAL DISTRIBUTION R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 451,582.31 02100 CDBG FUND 13,614.72 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 10,741.89 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 54,866.16 05100 ART CENTER FUND 1,064.81 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 2,004.41 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 177.20 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 19,626.67 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 1,334.11 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 14,691.16 . 05800 LIQUOR FUND 166,343.75 05900 UTILITY FUND 23,197.48 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 154.52 Report Totals 759,399.19 CITY OF E. 5/1/20. .38:27 Council Check Summary Page - 1 5/3/2007 - 5/3/2007 We confirm to the best of ow lam and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the ee**wnents of the City of Edba pwdmft and P dqft.,��jl D R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF . 5/9rc 4:52:25 Council Check Register Page - 1 5/4/2007 — 5/10/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 296687 51412007 101165 M.A.A.O. 110.00 MAAO SUMMER SEMINARS 160227 050307 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 110.00 296688 511012007 100612 A.M. LEONARD 104.48 SHOVELS 00002396 160291 0224349101044 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 1553.6260 1553.6260 5822.5515 5842.5515 1646.6556 1301.6201 5511.6180 5822.5514 1621.6406 LICENSES & PERMITS LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING TOOLS LAUNDRY CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 104.48 296689 5/10/2007 100613 AAA 121.38 PLATES FOR 47.533 160228 050207 121.38 296690 5/10/2007 100613 AAA 1,298.56 PLATES FOR 25.249 160229 MAY207 1,298.56 296691 5110/2007 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 40.12 160135 608369 92.36 - 160136 608370 132.48 296692 5/1012007 105476 ACE TRAILER SALES 1,475.00 MOWER TRAILER 00005955 160048 19753 1,475.00 296693 5/10/2007 104225 ADAMS, DAVE 84.84 UNIFORM PURCHASE 160292 050307 84.84 296694 5/10/2007 120985 ADUDDELL ROOFING & SHEETMETAL 3,512.00 ROOF LEAK REPAIRS 00008035 160052 MN67110 3,512.00 296695 5/10/2007 120904 ALCORN BEVERAGE CO INC. 64.50 160352 495840 64.50 296696 5/1012007 120984 ALL GOALS INC. 202.35 SOCCER GOAL BACKSTAYS 00005407 159948 3140 202.35 296697 5/10/2007 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC. 1553.6260 1553.6260 5822.5515 5842.5515 1646.6556 1301.6201 5511.6180 5822.5514 1621.6406 LICENSES & PERMITS LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING TOOLS LAUNDRY CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/9/2007 14:52:25 Council Check Register Page - 2 514/2007 - 5/10/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 12.78 PRO DV CASSETTES 160279 RTLINVO5760 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 12.78 - 296698 5/10/2007 102575 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIAT 150.00 COMMUNICATIONS CLASS 00005910 160049 685345 1260.6104 CONFERENCES S SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL 150.00 296699 5110/2007 103957 AMERICAN VAN EQUIPMENT INC. 200.34 STORAGE SYSTEM 00005880 160050 318573 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 200.34 296700 5/10/2007 101124 ANDY'S MARKETS DELI 4,173.72 VOLUNTEER REC CATERING 160051 042407 1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES 4,173.72 296701 5110/2007 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 658.19 FOOD 160248 749882 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 658.19 296702 5/10/2007 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 12.00 160093 050107 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 43.95 160093 050107 5821.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 66.57 160093 050107 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 72,74 160093 050107 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 74.22 160093 050107 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 88.81 160093 050107 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 102,81 160093 050107 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 112,99 160093 050107 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 129.22 160093 050107 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 191.37 160093 050107 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE S GROUNDS 221.74 COMPLEX 160093 050107 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 239.01 160093 050107 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 244.72 160093 050107 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 254,07 160093 050107 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 254,08 160093 050107 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 382.07 160093 050107 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 431.93 ROSLAND PARK 160093 050107 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 472.54 160093 050107 5620.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 130.22 160280 MAY0107 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL PSTF OCCUPANCY 264.48 ROLLOFF 160316 209357 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 245.06 ACCT 1 -20904 6 160317 REFUSE 5311.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL POOL OPERATION 4,034.60 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF. Council Check Register 5/4/2007 - 5/10/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 296703 5/1012007 101954 AUGIE'S INC. 77.59 FOOD 160249 20112 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1470.6579 5422.6275 5822.5513 5842.5515 5842.5513 5842.5512 5862.5515 5862.5512 7411.6136 1400.6203 2127.6103 1500.6406 1265.6406 1260.6406 1190.6406 1190.6406 5110.6513 5840.6513 TRAINING AIDS 519A 4:52:25 Page - 3 Business Unit RICHARDS GOLF COURSE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COURSE BEAUTIFICATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 77.59 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 296704 5/1012007 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 120995 AVR INC. COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 591.08 WALL PANELS FOR TRAINING 00003784 160318 80409 591.08 296705 511012007 100638 BACHMAN'S 79.93 FLOWERS 160250 042007 79.93 296706 511012007 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 72.00 160017 40692700 210.34 160018 42892300 167.30 160019 40692900 950.50 160020 40692800 244.45 160021 42881700 759.60 160353 40760000 2,404.19 296707 511012007 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 562.48 LAWN CARE 160290 12968 562.48 296708 5/1012007 119213 BENTLEY, MACHELL 176.82 UNIFORM PURCHASE 160094 050207 176.82 296709 511012007 120727 BERGO ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 2,925.00 WRAP SOFFIT & RAFTERS 160053 2763 2,925.00 296710 5110/2007 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 8.91 NAME BADGES 159949 WO- 449926 -1 242.50 BINDERS 160054 OE- 1094941 28.29 LASER POINTER 160055 OE- 109862 -1 33.71 OFFICE SUPPLIES 160095 WO. 450105 -1 63.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES 160096 W0-449930 -1 215.35 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009038 160097 OE- 108833 -1 97.13 OFFICE SUPPLIES 160231 OE- 110148 -1 1470.6579 5422.6275 5822.5513 5842.5515 5842.5513 5842.5512 5862.5515 5862.5512 7411.6136 1400.6203 2127.6103 1500.6406 1265.6406 1260.6406 1190.6406 1190.6406 5110.6513 5840.6513 TRAINING AIDS 519A 4:52:25 Page - 3 Business Unit RICHARDS GOLF COURSE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COURSE BEAUTIFICATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING SNOW & LAWN CARE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE PSTF OCCUPANCY POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMM DEV BILK GRANT GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES CONTINGENCIES TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION ENGINEERING GENERAL ASSESSING ASSESSING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION LIQUOR YORK GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 5/9/2007 14:52:25 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 4 514/2007 — 5110/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 20.98 HOLDERS _ 00006170 160251 OE- 110508 -1 5410.6513. OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 235.33 BOXES 00003789 160320 OE- 109393 -1 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 945.45 296711 5/10/2007 101296 BERTRAND, MIKE 67.82 KITCHEN SUPPLIES 160230 050207 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 67.82 296712 5/1012007 104465 BEST WESTERN KELLY INN 272.16 TRAINING ACCOMMODATIONS 00116161 160232 127346 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 272.16 296713 5110/2007 119679 BIXBY PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE 125.65 RESTROOM RENTAL 00005962 160056 5820 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 125.65 296714 5/10/2007 119431 BLINK BONNIE - 66.23 BIKE TRAIL MEETING FOOD 160098 553 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 66.23 296715 5/10/2007 104481 BREDE EXPOSITION SERVICES 1,586.00 SHOW CURTAIN RENTAL 00008037 160281 02500820 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 1,586.00 296716 5110/2007 106484 BRINDLE, MARY 200.00 HUMAN RIGHTS AWARDS 160057 050107 1504.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 200.00 296717 5/10/2007 100667 BROCK WHITE COMPANY 187.47 EMACO, GEL PATCH 00005447 160293 11630779 -00 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKING RAMP 187.47 296718 5/10/2007 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 297.14 POSTCARDS 00009154 160099 9845 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 297.14 296719 5/1012007 120935 CAMP_ BELL KNUTSON 5,594.65 LEGAL 160416 2851G 1195.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES 5,594.65 296720 5110/2007 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 160137 67185 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 51.90 .5822.5515 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF. Council Check Register 5/4/2007 - 5/10/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 749.30 160138 67186 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1,616.35 160139 17245 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1495.6710 1495.6710 1495.6710 1554.6406 5822.5514 5822.6122 5842.6122 5862.6122 1160.6406 1120.6406 1554.6230 1480.6710 5424.6406 5420.6230 1375.6406 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/9YA 4:52:25 Page - 5 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS CENT SERV GEN - MIS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SPECIAL OPERATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKING RAMP 2,417.55 298721 5/1012007 119860 CAR TRUCK CITY 12,805.80 2007 CHEVROLET MALIBU 00005031 160058 12532 12,805.80 2007 CHEVROLET MALIBU 00005031 160059 12530 12,805.80 2007 CHEVROLET MALIBU 00005031 160060 12531 38,417.40 296722 5/10/2007 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 591.04 TONER 00004011 160061 FFT4262 591.04 296723 5110/2007 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 193.43 160022 336290 193.43 296724 5/10/2007 103040 CITY PAGES 80.66 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 160282 100196772 80.66 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 160282 100196772 80.68 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 160282 _ 100196772 242.00 296725 5/10/2007 105693 CITYSPRINT 14.12 COURIER SERVICE 160100 6101 18.14 COURIER SERVICE 160100 6101 178.75 COURIER SERVICE 160100 6101 211.01 296726 511012007 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 1,077.00 CALIBRATION GAS 00003766 160101 109042 1,077.00 296727 511012007 120433 COMCAST 74.95 8772 15 614 0388355 160233 042307 61.74 877215 614 0406553 160234 042507 136.69 296728 5/10/2007 116356 CONSTRUCTION MIDWEST INC. 607.72 EUCOPDXY, SIKAFLEX 00005985 160294 383962 607.72 1495.6710 1495.6710 1495.6710 1554.6406 5822.5514 5822.6122 5842.6122 5862.6122 1160.6406 1120.6406 1554.6230 1480.6710 5424.6406 5420.6230 1375.6406 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/9YA 4:52:25 Page - 5 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS INSPECTIONS CENT SERV GEN - MIS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES FINANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SPECIAL OPERATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CLUB HOUSE GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKING RAMP CITY OF EDINA 5/9/2007 14:52:25 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 6 514/2007 -51110/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 296729 5/10/2007 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 235.92 CLAY, TEAPOT HANDLES 00009143 160102 R200336812 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 235.92 296730 5/10/2007 100697 COOL AIR MECHANICAL 4,752.63 REPLACE RELIEF VALVES 00008031 160062 60556 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 4,752.63 296731 5/10/2007 100513- COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES IN 2,742.38 CUSTODIAL SERVICES 160063 7070118682 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,742.38 296732 5/10/2007 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 4,168.80 160023 407311 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 679.00 160024 408132 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 772.28 160140 408139 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 600.00 160141 408066 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 947.50 160142 408117 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,247.55 160143 408140 5842.5514. COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 19,80 160144 408141 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 360.00 160145 408067 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 156.55 160354 408133 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER SELLING 58.80 160355 408138 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,447.70 160356 408137 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 13,457.98 296733 5/10/2007 118490 DEEP ROCK WATER COMPANY 4.79 WATER 160064 6098693 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 4.79 296734 5/1012007 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 23.58 BAKERY 160252 244331 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 55.62 BAKERY 160253 244572 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 75.61 BAKERY 160254 244571 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 22.85 BAKERY 160255 244716 5421.5510. COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 22.08 BAKERY 160256 244787 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL. 37.26 BAKERY 160257 244903 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 237.00 296735 5/1012007 111120 DESIGN N PRINT 83.99 CLUBHOUSE HANDOUTS 00002025 160295- 33212 5610.6575 PRINTING ED ADMINISTRATIr R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF . 5/9/2. 4:52:25 Council Check Register Page - 7 5/4/2007 - 5/10/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 83.99 296736 5/10/2007 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST 438.30 160235 304855617 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 438.30 160235 304855617 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 438.30 160235 304855617 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,314.90 296737 5/10/2007 100739 EAGLE WINE 80.80 160146 584260 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 693.20 160147 585307 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,304.72 160148 585296 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,074.90 160149 583983 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 655.96 160150 585302 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,809.58 296738 5/10/2007 120986 EDELWEISS DESIGN INC. 370.00 ELM TREES 00005736 160065 1108 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES S MAINTENANCE 370.00 296739 5/10/2007 106340 EDINA CAR WASH 76.68 APRIL WASHES 160296 2928 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 76.68 296740 5/10/2007 101321 EDINA HARDWARE 28.11 OUTLET ENDS, RIVET TOOL 00009147 160103 62029 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 28.11 296741 5/10/2007 101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2,811.00 OPERATIONS /MAINTENANCE BILL 00007153 160283 6060 1621.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 2,811.00 296742 5110/2007 118010 EGAN, BILL 508.25 REMOVE BEAVERS FROM CREEK 00005839 159950 050107 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER 508.25 296743 511012007 120994 EIGER, BARB 52.00 TRIP REFUND 160319 050307 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 52.00 296744 5/10/2007 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 5,129.40 APRIL TRANSPORTS 160413 050407 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5/9/2007 14:52:25 Page - 8 Business Unit RICHARDS GOLF COURSE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONTINGENCIES CENTENNIAL LAKES BUILDING MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2158 CAMERA CASES 00004393 159951 41068620 1552.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 21.58 296752 5/10/2007 102383 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS AS 295.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 160417 0023001 1160.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FINANCE 145.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 160418 28198 1160.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FINANCE 440.00 296753 67012007 102645 GRAFFITI CONTROL SERVICES 288.00 GRAFFITI REMOVAL 00005965 160069 45 1646.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 288.00 296754 5/10/2007 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 155.50 160025 90527 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,135.00 160151 90628 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 5142007 — 5/10/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier./ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5,129.40 296745 5/1012007 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 64.00 160258 549433 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 64.00 296746 5/10/2007 120329 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES INC 116.19 NAME PANELS 00003797 160321 5041 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 116.19 296747 5110/2007 102015 FLOWERS OF EDINA 39.41- VOLUNTEER REC ROSES 160066 3988 1500.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 39.41 296748 5110/2007 102418 GARDENSIDE LTD 2,180.51 BENCHES, CHAIRS 00002007 160297 24946 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,180.51 296749 5110/2007 105508 GEMPLER'S INC. 100.85 SAFETY GLASSES 00005912 160067 1009480437 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 100.85 296750 5/10/2007 118941 GLOBALSTAR USA 55.67 R -91 PHONE 160322 411566 1470.6188 TELEPHONE 55.67 296751 5/10/2007 120929 GOVCONNECTION INC. 5/9/2007 14:52:25 Page - 8 Business Unit RICHARDS GOLF COURSE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONTINGENCIES CENTENNIAL LAKES BUILDING MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2158 CAMERA CASES 00004393 159951 41068620 1552.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 21.58 296752 5/10/2007 102383 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS AS 295.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 160417 0023001 1160.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FINANCE 145.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 160418 28198 1160.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FINANCE 440.00 296753 67012007 102645 GRAFFITI CONTROL SERVICES 288.00 GRAFFITI REMOVAL 00005965 160069 45 1646.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 288.00 296754 5/10/2007 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 155.50 160025 90527 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,135.00 160151 90628 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 296755 5/10/2007 296756 5/10/2007 Amount Supplier/ Explanation 474.07 507.25 2,271.82 CITY OF L Council Check Register 5/4/2007 - 5/10/2007 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 160152 90221 5822.5513 160357 90703 5842.5513 120989 GRAPHIC SYSTEMS INC. 328.54 ADVERTISING 00009153 160104 A197816 328.54 101516 GRAUSAM, STEVE 51.00 CELL PHONE CHARGES 51.00 296757 5/10/2007 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 16,748.00 GROUP LESSONS 16,748.00 160423 050707 160236 050207 5110.6122 5841.6188 5410.6132 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE ADVERTISING OTHER TELEPHONE 5/9121, :52:25 Page - 9 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION YORK OCCUPANCY PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 296759 5/10/2007 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 78.87 160026 583169 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 729.80 160153 583916 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 914.84 160154 585300 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 729.80 160155 583914 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,211.20 160156 583962 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 542.40 160157 585217 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 672.26 160158 585306 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 29.85 160159 585305 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 446.18 160160 585303 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 364.90 160161 583915 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING .90 160162 583950 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,207.19 160163 584256 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 8,262.75 160164 585311 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 838.02 160165 583171 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 141.55 160166 585310 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,152.41 160167 584258 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,042.96 160168 584261 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,191.00 160169 582957 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 484.45 160170 585309 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 286.46 160171 583170 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,202.00- 160172 720354 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6,947.46 160358 585299 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 117.49 160359 581315 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 140.42 160360 587074 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 27.00- 160361 720570 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/9/2007 14:52:25 Council Check Register Page - .10 5/4/2007 — 5/10/2007' Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 23.26- '160362 721022 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 33.00- 160363 721047 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING - 32,247.90 296760 5/10/2007 100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT 577.32 MOWER PARTS 00005724 160070 42632 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 87.28 TURF SUPPLIES 00005973 ,160323. 43168 1643.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL TURF CARE 664.60 296761 5/10/2007 104459 GS DIRECT 55.35 PLOTTER PAPER 00004016 160068 231919 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 55.35 296762 5/10/2007 106431 HALL, MARY 150.00 PERFORMANCE 5/15/07 159952 050107 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 296763 5/10/2007 102301 HARTLAND FUEL PRODUCTS LLC ' 16,898.91 GAS 00001437 159953 801091 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 16,898.91 296764 5/10/2007 114483 HEIMAN FIRE EQUIPMENT INC. 9,231.60 THERMAL IMAGING CAMERA 00003765 160105 0728431 -IN 1480.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SPECIAL OPERATIONS 9,231.60 296765 5/10/2007 115599 HENNEPIN COUNTY ATTORNEYS OFF 94.79 DWI FORFEITURE 160419 050707 4601.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE FORFEITURE 94.79 296766 5/10/2007 106288 HENNEPIN COUNTY RECORDER 10.00 PLAT 160106 050107 .1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 10.00 296767 5/10/2007 101215 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFF[ 1,003.44 BOOKING FEES - MAR 2007 160237 1484 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES 1,003.44 296768 5/10/2007 103838 HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE 375.00 EMT TESTING 160324 00128011 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 375.00 296769 5110120C17 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY CITY OF E. 5/9/2L :52:25 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 11 5/4/2007 - 5/10/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,432.98 LAPTOPS FOR PUBLIC WORKS 00004395 159954 42170525 1552.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 2,600.20 COMPUTERS FOR PARK & REC 00004400 159955 42176747 1600.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 42.66 CARD READERS FOR ENG 00004399 159956 42174179 5923.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COLLECTION SYSTEMS 5,075.84 296770 5/10/2007 103753 HILLYARD INC. 2,406.28 RESTROOM DOORIPARTITIONS 00002398 160298 2096755 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 2,406.28 296771 5/10/2007 102483 HILTI INC. 2,398.53 CORE DRILL 00003777 160107 1603175285 1480.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SPECIAL OPERATIONS 2,398.53 296772 5/10/2007 100805 HIRSHFIELD'S 46.28 PAINT 00003796 160325 003220721 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 46.28 296773 5/10/2007 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI 476.06 FIELD MARKING PAINT 00005734 160071 75293 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 476.06 296774 5/10/2007 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 51.90 160027 417456 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 810.24 160028 417455 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 749.50 160173 418088 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 51.90 160174 418221 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 763.45 160175 418220 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,426.99 296775 5/10/2007 100810 HRA/CITY OF EDINA 9,500.00 TO FUND HRA 160326 050407 1000.1303 DUE FROM HRA GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 9,500.00 296776 5/1012007 101426 HUGHES, GORDON 244.44 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 159957 050107 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 244.44 296777 511012007 100698 IMAGE TECH SERVICES 484.55 TONER 00004018 160072 93230 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 79.50 CARTRIDGE PAPER 00004012 160073 92889 1260.6548 BLUE PRINTING ENGINEERING GENERAL 564.05 CITY OF EDINA .. 5/9/2007 14:52:25 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 12 514/2007 - 5/10/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 296778 511012007 120990 INSPECTOR TOOLS 3,569.00 SEARCH CAMERA 00003785 160108 118479 1480.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SPECIAL OPERATIONS 3,569.00 296779 511012007 101403 J -CRAFT 100,512.57 TRUCK BODY 00005006 160074 41821 1305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 100,512.57 296780 5/1012007 106829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 3.19 160075 043007 1280.6406 GENERAL- SUPPLIES SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 5.49 160075 043007 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 7.99 160075 043007 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 9.77 160075 043007 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 14.98 160075 043007 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 19.87 160075 043007 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 22.15 160075 043007 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 24.06 160075 043007 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 24.58 160075 043007 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 33.81 160075 043007 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING 71.48 160075 043007 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY, 90.59 160075 043007 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 95.60 160075 043007 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 96.58 160075 043007 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 111.85 160075 043007 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 121.34 160075 043007 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 121.99 160075 043007 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 175.95 160075 043007 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 262.34 160075 043007 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 377.25 160075 043007 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 525.14 160075 043007 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 847.63 160075 043007 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 3,063.63 296781 511012007 100830 JERRY'S PRINTING 150.17 POOL SEASON PASSES 160076 39871 5310.6575 PRINTING POOL ADMINISTRATION 150.17 296782 5/1012007 100.741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 21.30 160029 858400 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 83.05 160030 858401 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,950.75 160031 1071887 '5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 77.50 160176 1071947 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF L 5/9/2 4:52:25 Council Check Register Page - 13 5/412007 - 5/10/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3,650.20 160177 1071946 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 182.50 160259 858177 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 611.00 160260 1074543 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 69.00 160364 1071954 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 42.00 160365 1071945 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,715.70 160366 1071944 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 7,379.55 160367 1071953 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 42.41- 160368 852096 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 22,740.14 296784 5/10/2007 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 243.51 160178 1248030 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1.35 160179 1247203 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,215.35 160180 1247209 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 95.26 160181 1247213 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING. 806.66 160369 1251377 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,312.38 160370 1251374 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 97.08 160371 1251372 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,099.84 160372 1251375 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,978.15 160373 1251378 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 8.28 160374 1251370 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 285.97 160375 1251376 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,523.53 160376 1251373 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 575.63 160377 1251380 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,271.04 160378 1251382 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,213.04 160379 1251381 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 87.08 160380 1251379 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3.60 160381 1251371 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,886.16 160382 1251384 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,962.56 160383 1247216 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 982.19 160384 1251365 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 270.41 160385 1251363 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 933.06 160386 1251366 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 561.11 160387 1251364 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 4,528.87 160388 1251383 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 39,942.11 296785 5110/2007 103230 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVICE 346.13 VACUUM 00003794 160327 050307 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 346.13 296786 5/10/2007 101502 KONTERS, VIK R55CKREG LOG20000 160034 CITY OF EDINA 5822.5514 5/9/2007 14:52:25 160035 296788 Council Check Register 140.00 Page - 14 178656 5862.5514 514/2007 -5/10/2007 160037 84.00 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # _ Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 288.58 UNIFORM PURCHASE 160109 050207 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 288.58 117014 LAKE COUNTRY RESOURCES INC. 296787 5/10/2007 120982 KROOG, RACHEL 47.50 GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION 160278 200.00 PERFORMANCE 5/17/07 159958 050107 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 1644.6103 4401.6710 1553.6406 1643.6546 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR GENERAL SUPPLIES WEED SPRAY 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5630.6406 1310.6523 1,401.55 160034 200.00 5822.5514 18.45 160035 296788 5/10/2007 140.00 120987 KUNDE CONSULTANTS INC. 178656 5862.5514 2,332.87 160037 84.00 FORESTRY CONSULTING 00005966 160077 1011 181284 5862.5514 84.00 296789 5/10/2007 117014 LAKE COUNTRY RESOURCES INC. 47.50 GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION 160278 2 47.50 296790 5/10/2007 - 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 204.71 CLEVIS HOOKS, LOCK NUTS 00005981 159959 5554692 204.71 296791 5/10/2007 100855 LESCO INC. . 1,393.93 WEED SPRAY 00005961 160078 5724FBIC 1,393.93 296792 5/10/2007 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 420.79 160032 12823 829.09 160033 12385 1,249.88 296793 5/10/2007 105680 MAAS, STACY 137.67 PETTY CASH 160329 050107 137.67 296794 511012007. 100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 1,910.61 STRIP BROOMS 00005445 159960 2073139 1,910.61 296795. 5/10/2007 100868 MARK VII SALES 1644.6103 4401.6710 1553.6406 1643.6546 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR GENERAL SUPPLIES WEED SPRAY 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5630.6406 1310.6523 1,401.55 160034 183459 5822.5514 18.45 160035 183460 5822.5515 140.00 160036 178656 5862.5514 2,332.87 160037 183657 5842.5514 1,366.75 160038 181284 5862.5514 GENERAL SUPPLIES BROOMS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL TURF CARE 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING CENTENNIAL LAKES STREET CLEANING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING I R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF. 519/2, 1:52:25 Council Check Register Page - 15 5/412007 - 5/10/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,051.14 160039 181027 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 55.35 160040 181028 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 6,108.05 160041 183675 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 747.20 160182 183458 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,221.80 160183 184507 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 76.65 160184 184508 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,342.03 160389 186419 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,842.00 160390 183969 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,724.73 160391 186214 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 28,428.57 296796 511012007 100869 MARTIN- MCALLISTER 350.00 PERSONNEL EVALUATION 160328 5467 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 350.00 296797 5/10/2007 100515 MCM ELECTRONICS, 146.48 AUDIO EQUIPMENT 00009141 160110 511868 5125.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT MEDIA STUDIO 146.48 296798 5/10/2007 100953 MEDTRONIC EMERGENCY RESPONSES 937.50 LIFEPAK MAINTENANCE 00003644 160330 PH173761 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 937.50 296799 511012007 101483 MENARDS 110.54 DUCT TAPE, ROPE LIGHTS 00008029 160079 20978 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 145.94 CABLE TIES, ROPE LIGHTS 00008030 160080 22219 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 44.13 ANCHORS, BITS, CLIPS 00005916 160081 19004 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 41.28 STAPLE GUN, DRYWALL ANCHORS 00001122 160331 22648 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 341.89 296800 5/10/2007 101987 MENARDS 156.18 WEED WACKER, GLOVES 00002009 160299 86929 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 156.18 296601 5/1012007 104366 MENDEL, NATHAN 60.78 INSTRUCTOR SCHOOL 160111 043007 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 60.78 296802 5110/2007 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 1,078.08 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00005714 160082 71718 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 368.49 BATTERIES 160112 71792 5841.6530 REPAIR PARTS YORK OCCUPANCY 1,508.90 BAGS 00005440 160300 71791 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA WANT AD 160238 10910 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL _ CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL Council Check Register 130.20 5/4/2007 — 5/10/2007 296809 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 916.73 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00005737 160332 71799 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 3,872.20 15.00 296803 5/10/2007 296610 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 100066 MINNESOTA MAILING SOLUTIONS 877.19 BASES, HOME PLATE, PAINT 00005936 159961 98812 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 44018 1400.6235 992.95 HOME PLATE, BASES, FIELD PAINT 00005940 160333 99000 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,870.14 296811 5110/2007 296804 5/10/2007 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME 64.09 299,156.84 SEWER SERVICE 160334 0000846621 5922.6302 SEWER SERVICE METRO 299,156.84 296805 5/1012007 511011°^7 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 120996 MOBILE MINI INC. 139.30 TRASH LINERS 00003791 160335 24573 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 139.30 296806 5/10/2007 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA EAGAN 527.60 160042 0178084509 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 14.40- 160043 0178084510 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 513.20 296807 5/10/2007 101890 MIDWEST VENDING INC 174.80 CANDY 160262 5361 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 174.80 296808 5/10/2007 117357 MINNESOTA DAILY, THE 5/9/2007 14:52:25 Page - 16 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE FIELD MAINTENANCE SEWER TREATMENT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING GRILL 130.20 WANT AD 160238 10910 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL _ CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 130.20 296809 5110/2007 100905 MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION 15.00 RULES OF GOLF BOOKLETS 160261 050107 .5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 15.00 296610 5/1012007 100066 MINNESOTA MAILING SOLUTIONS 25.05 SEALER BRUSH AND SPONGES 160239 44018 1400.6235 POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 25.05 296811 5110/2007 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT 64.09 COUPLINGS 00005838 159962 0204567 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 64.09 296812 511011°^7 120996 MOBILE MINI INC. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF, 5/9/2 4:52:25 Council Check Register Page - 17 5/4/2007 — 5/10/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,926.69 TRAILER RENTAL 160336 151001790 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 5400.1740 5440.5511 5110.6122 1260.6104 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT GOLF BALANCE SHEET COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 1480.6710 1140.6105 5842.5513 1,592.40 MERCHANDISE 160263 910647146 5440.5511 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SPECIAL OPERATIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PLANNING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,926.69 296813 5/10/2007 120999 MOHAWK RESOURCES LTD 10,824.89 MAINTENANCE LIFT 00006064 160412 27009 10,824.89 296814 511012007 101188 MOMENTUS GOLF INC. ' 795.06 MERCHANDISE 00006180 160415 28065A 795.06 296815 5/10/2007 118986 MORRIS PARK PLAYERS 105.00 PROGRAM AD 00009145 160113 041707 105.00 296816 5/10/2007 101626 MPWA 195.00 SPRING CONFERENCE 00005911 160083 050107 195.00 296817 5/1012007 102776 MRPA 100.00 JOB POSTING 159963 5053 100.00 296818 5/10/2007 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 451.88 MOWER PARTS 00002023 160301 562544-00 168.93 IRRIGATION PARTS 00002030 160302 566650 -00 620.81 296819 5/10/2007 101390 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES 170.30 LIGHTS 00003778 160114 411297 170.30 296820 5/10/2007 117034 NAPC 80.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 160411 050107 80.00 296821 511012007 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 105.00 160185 43260 105.00 296822 5/10/2007 104350 NIKE USA INC. 5400.1740 5440.5511 5110.6122 1260.6104 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT GOLF BALANCE SHEET COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 1480.6710 1140.6105 5842.5513 1,592.40 MERCHANDISE 160263 910647146 5440.5511 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT SPECIAL OPERATIONS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PLANNING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES CITY OF EDINA 5/9/2007 14:52:25 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 18 514/2007 - 5/10/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 926.96 MERCHANDISE 160264 910647145 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,519.36 296823 5/10/2007 102138 NORTHERN WINDS CONCERT BAND 75.00 PERFORMANCE 5/13/07 159965 050107 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 75.00 296824 5/10/2007 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 101.65 CHARCOAL, PADS 00009152 160115 34280200 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 126.64 CHARCOAL, CHAMOIS 00009142 160116 34249300 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 228.29 296825 5110/2007 118651 O'CONNELL, FABIAN 164.38 SIGNS - DESIGN, LABOR, MATERIAL 160284 050307 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 164.38 296826 6/10/2007 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 30.64 PAPER 00006034 160265 384010852 - 001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 87.32 FOLDERS, PLANNER, PENCILS 00002029 160303 383941599 -001 5610.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION 117.96 296827 5110/2007 101470 ORVIS, JOAN 357.28 ICE SHOW TROPHIES 160240 050307 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG/GROUNDS 357.28 296828 5/10/2007 120993 PAUSER, RODNEY 380.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 160276 050407 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 380.00 296829 5/1012007 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1,035.69 160186. 8144788 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,776.00 160187 8144790 -1N 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS, SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,772.00 160188 8144791 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8.00- 160189 8144023 -CM 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,452.00 160392 8144789 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 9,027.69 296830 5/10/2007 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 1,057.04 160266 11148887 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 746.40 160267 11148791 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 1,60125 - CREDIT ON ACCOUNT 160268 7/11/06 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 202.19 a R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF. 5/9/2, 1:52:25 Council Check Register Page - 19 5/4/2007 - 5/10/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 296831 5/10/2007 100950 PETTY CASH 1.05 159964 043007 2210.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 5.25 159964 043007 1190.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING 5.99 159964 043007 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 8.50 159964 043007 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 10.21 159964 043007 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 13.85 159964 043007 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 15.01 159964 043007 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 15.41 159964 043007 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 19.39 159964 043007 1160.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE FINANCE 20.00 159964 043007 1280.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 21.35 159964 043007 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 21.94 159964 043007 1621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 22.47 159964 043007 5952.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RECYCLING 23.90 159964 043007 5952.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RECYCLING 30.10 159964 043007 5840.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 33.00 159964 043007 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 37.46 159964 043007 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 40.00 159964 043007 2210.6106 MEETING EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 41.50 159964 043007 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 42.19 159964 043007 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 46.80 159964 043007 5860.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 60.00 159964 043007 1160.6106 MEETING EXPENSE FINANCE 70.00 159964 043007 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 73.34 159964 043007 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 89.66 159964 043007 1513.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 143.08 _ 159964 043007 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL 911.45 296832 5/1012007 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 349.60 160044 2456793 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 199.59 160045 2456949 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 814,77 160190 2459610 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 46.90 160191 2459609 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,501.63 160192 2459608 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,756.55 160393 2459605 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 32.20 160394 2459606 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 251.19 160395. 2459604 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 611.48 160396 2459607 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 102.53 160397 2459944 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 303.72 160398 2459611 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA " 5/9/2007 14:52:25 RSSCKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 20 5/4/2007 — 5/10/2007' Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 392.26 160399 - 2459603 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 46.90 160400 - 2459601 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH.ST SELLING 1,783.42 160401 2459600 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 84,62 160402 2459602 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 8,277.36 296833 511012007. 100956 PIPE SERVICES CORP 1,612.50 SANITARY SEWER INSPECTION 00005828 160304 2007016 5923.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS COLLECTION SYSTEMS 1,612.50 296834 5/10/2007 120988 PLYMOUTH FRAMERY 1,171.50 POLICE SHIRTS SHADOWBOX 160117 639853 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,171.50 296835 5/10/2007 111340 POLAR CHEVROLET 19,477.90 SILVERADO PICKUP TRUCK 00005429 160420 7E550529 1305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 19,477.90 296636 5/10/2007 102350 POLO RALPH LAUREN CORPORATION 1,398.72 MERCHANDISE 160269 63973 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,398.72 296837 5/1012007 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 500.00 BRM PERMIT #6171002 160241 042707 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 500.00 29683.8 5/10/2007 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 400.00 NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 160337 050407 1628.6235 POSTAGE SENIOR CITIZENS 400.00 296839 5/10/2007 116396 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 1,280.27 METHANE, CO2 160285 25990912 7413.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF FIRE TOWER 1,280.27 296840 511012007 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 162.00 BLADE SHARPENING 00008038 160286 227021 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 162.00 296841 5/10/2007 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 160193 584257 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 521.10 160194 585297 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 164.85 685.95 { 1 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF L. . Council Check Register 5/4/2007 - 5/10/2007 5/9/2k .:52:25 Page- 21. Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 296843 5110/2007 100971 QUALITY WINE 122.30 160195 854197 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 150.30 160196 854337 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 83.15 160197 854251 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,012.16 160198 854223 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,062.80 160199 854238-00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,109.78 160200 854153 -QO 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,576.16 160201 854198 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 85.15 160202 854338 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 425.45 160203 854181 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 196.36 160204 852557 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 866.05 160205 854224 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 568.20 160206 854387 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,116.92 160207 854180 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,069.19 160208 853304 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,403.55 160209 854185-00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 21.78- 160210 848324 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 81.95- 160211 849744 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,148.95 160403 853303 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 882,72 160404 855308 -00. 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 15.07- 160405 850614 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 45.98- 160406 850613 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 16,714.41 296844 511012007 101965 QWEST 122.54 952 927 -8861 160426 8861 -0 /07 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 78.42 952 929 -9549 160427 9549 -4/07 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 55.03 952 929 -0297 160428 0297 -4/07 4090.6188 TELEPHONE STREET REVOLVING 55.21 160429 042807 5911.6188 TELEPHONE PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 57.90 160429 042807 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 83.21 160429 042807 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 96.54 160429 042807 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 99.48 160429 042807 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 106.59 160429 042807 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 161.63 160429 042807 5610.6188 TELEPHONE ED ADMINISTRATION 163.96 160429 042807 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 232.40 160429 042807 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 263.90 160429 .042807 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 277,28 160429 042807 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 2,102.53 160429 042807 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 3,956.62 R55CKREG LOG20000' CITY OF EDINA 5/9/2007 14:52:25 Council Check Register Page - 22 5/4/2007 - 5/10/2007 Check # Date Amount. Supplier/ Explanation PO # , Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 296845 511012007 101109 RDO EQUIPMENT CO. 143.78 KNIVES 00005927 160084. P12903 1644.6530 - REPAIR PARTS TREES & MAINTENANCE 143.78 296846 _ 5/1012007 101111 REED BUSINESS INFORMATION 194.01 AD FOR BID 159966, 3609652 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 194.01 296847 5/10/2007 116614 REYNOLDS, MAYNARD 71.25 PERMIT REFUND 159967 ED081528 1495.4110 HEATING & VENTING LICENSE INSPECTIONS 71.25 296848 5/10/2007 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 166.95 DRAIN REPAIR 00006184 160270 45979 5430.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 342.20 REPAIR RPZ 00002026 160305 46004 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES 509.15 296849 5/10/2007 114489 RICOH CORPORATION 78.00 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 160287 H042400198 -21 7411.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS PSTF OCCUPANCY 78.00 296.850 5/10/2007 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 133.08 PARTS WASHER CHANGE OUT 00001178 160306 0033884170. 1280.6271 HAZ. WASTE DISPOSAL SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 133.08 296851 5/1012007 .101232 SALUD AMERICA 633.00 160212 EMLS050207C 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING' 633.00 296852 5110/2007 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 11.24 101- 26373069350 160338 POPCORN 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 11.24 296853 5/1012007 103015 SCHEERER, JOHN 69.86 UNIFORM PURCHASE .160307 050407 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 69.86 296854 5/10/2007 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 593.43 QTRLY SERVICE CONTRACT 159968 8101798545 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 584.91 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 00001179 160308 8101799822 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKING RAMP r � 1,178.34 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF 5/9/2, 4:52:25 Council Check Register Page - 23 514/2007 - 5/10/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation. PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 296855 5/1012007 119591 SCIPIONI, CHRISTINA 157.24 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 160242. 050307 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 157.24 296856 5/1012007 102949 SECURITAS SECURITY SYSTEMS USA 575.91 ALARM MONITORING 160309 D3150336 5630.6250 ALARM SERVICE CENTENNIAL LAKES 575.91 2.96857 5110/2007 104689 SERIGRAPHICS SIGN SYSTEMS INC. 207.95 ART GLASS PLAQUE 160118 38651 4105.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC ART 207.95 296858 5/10/2007 118214 SEVERN TRENT LABORATORIES INC. 210.00 RADIUM TESTING 00005836 159969 30059027 5915.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WATER TREATMENT 210.00 296859 5/10/2007 119909 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 34.31 PAINT 00002028 160310 3645-4 5630.6532 PAINT CENTENNIAL LAKES 34.31 296860 5/10/2007 120997 SHIRTYSOMETHING 560.30 UNIFORMS 00003795 160339 14778 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 560.30 296861 5110/2007 100999 SIGNAL SYSTEMS INC. 85.00 CLOCK VERIFICATION, REPAIRS 00007144 160085 76796 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 85.00 296662 5/1012007 101383 SIITARI, MICHAEL 161.84 LUNCH MEETING EXPENSE 160119 050207 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 237.92 TRAINING EXPENSES 160120 050307 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 399.76 296863 511012007 100629 SMITH, AMY 271.60 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 160271 050307 5410.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 271.60 296864 5/1012007 120677 SONUS INTERIORS INC. 19,684.00 GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION 160277 2 4401.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR 19,684.00 - CITY OF EDINA 5/9/2007 14:52:25 RSSCKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 24 5/4/2007 - 5/10/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 296865 5/10/2007 101023 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMI 2,120.30 SPECIAL CONTRIBUTION 160121 200712 2210.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COMMUNICATIONS 2,120.30 296866 5/1012007 116682 SPECIALTY WINES & BEVERAGES 201.00 160046 15092 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 201.00 296867 5/10/2007 101021 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC 63.98 PROPANE 00001157 159970 042407 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 63.98 296868 5/10/2007 116856 SPRINT 1,309.14 CONNECTION CARD DATA PLAN 160122 APR1507 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,309.14 296869 5/10/2007 101004 SPS COMPANIES 16.31 SPLIT RINGS 00005943 160340 - S1638572.001 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 16.31 296870 5/1012007 116175 ST. CROIX HARLEY- DAVIDSON 586.34 MOTORCYCLE MAINTENANCE 160341 455954 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE- POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 586.34 296871 5/10/2007 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC 167.98 BATTERY, FILTER 00005682 159971 S155308 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 167.98 296872 5/10/2007 102724 STALLION ELECTRIC INC. - 970.00 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 00005157 160123 2511 5111.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 970.00 296873 511012007 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 225.16 SUBSCRIPTION 493121 160124 RENEWAL 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 225.16 296874 5/10/2007 119671 STERLING SUPPLY INC. 52.19 QUARTZ 00005798 160086 57937 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 52.19 298875 5/10/2007 102262 STRATEGIC INSIGHTS COMPANY 1,278.00 CIP SOFTWARE 160243 07PLAN -IT -080 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVIC- '4NERAL 1 � CITY OF. 519A 4:52:25 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 25 5/4/2007 - 5/10/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No. Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,278.00 296876 511012007 117992 STRINGER BUSINESS SYSTEMS 29.16 COPIER USAGE 160125 1230439 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 29.16 296877 5/10/2007 104349 STRUCTURED NETWORK SOLUTIONS 576.66 INSTALLED SERVER CABINETS 160126 12690 4608.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE COMPUTER SYSTEM 576.66 296878 5/10/2007 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 89.38 AD FOR BID 00014798 160087 969720 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 121.55 PUBLISH ORD 2007 -06 00014798 160127 972270 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 32.18 PUBLISH NOTICE 00014798 160128 972269 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 243.11 296879 5/10/2007 101910 SUNGARD HTE INC. 6,600.00 IMPLEMENTATION/PROJECT SERVICE 160129 9191 4608.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE COMPUTER SYSTEM 34,305.25 DATA CONVERSION/GEOFILE 160130 9151 4608.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE COMPUTER SYSTEM 40,905.25 296880 5/10/2007 117686 TECHNAGRAPHICS 185.31 CITY ATTORNEY ENVELOPES 160244 3937011 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 185.31 296881 5/1012007 120992 TEHAMA 689.86 MERCHANDISE 00006016 160272 261418 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 689.86 296682 5/10/2007 100169 TEJAS 60.00 2006 LEAGUE CHAMPS 159972 043007 4077.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 60.00 296883 5/10/2007 113549 TENNIS WEST 2,300.00 FENCING MATERIALS 00005938 160088 07 -047 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 2,300.00 296884 5/10/2007 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 3,375.05 160047 444844 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 377.75 160273 445743 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 288.00 160274 445495 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 209.00 160275 27309 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL CITY OF EDINA 519/2007 14:52:25 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 26 5/4/2007 — 5110/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subiedger Account Description Business Unit 5,475.10 160407 445947 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 107.10 160408 445946 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 9,832.00 296885 5/10/2007 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLAN 926.94. BRIDGE CONSULTING 00005419 159973 000200701499 47055.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE REPAIR 926.94 296886 5/10/2007 106434 TMI COATINGS INC. 4,400.00 WASH_ WATER SLIDE AREAS 00004176 160342 15192 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 4,676.00 POOL PAINTING 00004183 160343 15193 5311.6532 PAINT POOL OPERATION 9,076.00 296887 511012007 101293 TODD, DARRELL 90.46 FLOOR COVERING 160344 050307 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 90.46 296888 5/10/2007 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 54.04 WELDING SUPPLIES 00005840 160089 426317 5913.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 54.04 296889 5/10/2007 100682 TRUGREEN - CHEMLAWN 195.00 LAWN SERVICE 00001195 160347 454081 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 195.00 296890 5/10/2007 116438 TWIN CITIES WELL_ NESS 250.00 ADVERTISING 00009151 160131 12531 5125.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER MEDIA STUDIO 250.00 296891 5/10/2007 102255 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO 192.14 OXYGEN 00003649 160345 022563 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES, FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 22.93 OXYGEN 00003649 160346 027427 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 215.07 296892 5/10/2007 100569 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 105.00 CLASS REGISTRATION 00005974. 160348 050407 1640.6104, CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 105.00 296893 5/10/2007 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 100.00 SEAL COAT OPERATIONS (2) 160312 050207 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 100.00 A 519/2. 4:52:25 Page - 27 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIELD MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 'PLANNING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE LITTER REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT BUILDING MAINTENANCE LITTER REMOVAL GOLF CARS 250.00 ABOUT BUSINESS PHOTOS 160245 041607 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 250.00 296902 5/10/2007 101061 VICTORY CORPS 353.97 FLAGS 160288 29984 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 353.97 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF L Council Check Register 5/4/2007 - 5/10/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 296894 5110/2007 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 420.00 MUNICI -PALS WORKSHOP 160430 LA 7152 1550.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 420.00 296895 5110/2007 102212 UPBEAT INC 1,319.59 PLAYER BENCHES 00005719 160090 INV0005494 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,319.59 296896 5/10/2007 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 6.77 SHIPPING 160421 TRAN 8090 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 54.09 SHIPPING 160422 TRAN 8672 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 60.86 296897 5/10/2007 100668 URS CORPORATION 8,749.50 COMP PLAN CONSULTING 159974 2814352 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8,749.50 296898 5/10/2007 120620 VALLONE, AMANDA 260.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 160424 050707 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 260.00 296899 5/10/2007 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 469.71 ROLL TOWEL, TISSUE,'LINERS 00005740 160091 034286 -00 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 185.36 CAN LINERS 00005740 160092 034579 -00 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 49.21 BOWL CLEANER 00009149 160132 034492 -01 5111.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 170.68 ROLL TOWEL, CAN LINERS 00009149 160133 034492 -00 5111.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 316.34 ROLL TOWEL, TISSUE 00005958 160349 035741 -00 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 37.07 CAN LINERS 00005740 160350 034579-01 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,228.37 296900 5/1012007 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 401.92 CLUTCH 00006492 160414 29320 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS 401.92 296901 5110/2007 117684 VICK PHOTOGRAPHY 519/2. 4:52:25 Page - 27 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL FIELD MAINTENANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 'PLANNING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE LITTER REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT BUILDING MAINTENANCE LITTER REMOVAL GOLF CARS 250.00 ABOUT BUSINESS PHOTOS 160245 041607 2210.6123 MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 250.00 296902 5/10/2007 101061 VICTORY CORPS 353.97 FLAGS 160288 29984 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 353.97 CITY OF EDINA 5/9/2007 14:52:25 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 28 5/4/2007 -5/10/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 296903 5/10/2007 101932 VOTH, BART 19.00 DRIVERS LICENSE UPGRADE 160246 050207 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 19.00 296904 5/10/2007 103466 WASTE MANAGEMENT - SAVAGE MN 3,342.11 REFUSE 160351 4051654 -2282 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 4,316.93 REFUSE 160431 4053654 -2282 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 7,659.04 296905 5/10/2007 101078 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT 110.89 FLEET GAS KEYS 00005897 160311 0034139 -IN 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 110.89 296906 5/10/2007 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 324.80 160213 165650 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 64.00 160214 165649 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 134,62 160215 164986-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 154.61 160216 164985-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 872.05 160217 165563 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 605.75 160218 165507 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 942.60 160409 165588-00 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,098.43 296907 5/10/2007 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 6,313.89 160219 190702 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 605.06 160220 190700 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING _ 20.00- 160221 32972 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 18.33- 160222' 32975 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8.67- 160223 32973 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 60.68- 160224 32974 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 555.98 160410 190701 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7,367.25 296908 511012007. 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 478.00 160225 193901 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 597.00 160226 193736 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,075.00 296909 5/10/2007 101726 XCEL ENERGY . 34.50 51- 8102668 -0 159975 108718318 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 7.34 51- 6050184 -2 159976 108519969 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 6.14 51- 6541084 -2 159977 108532705 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINT� ' E • R55CKREG - .4000 CITY Of Council Check Register 5412007 - 5/10/2007 519/ 14:52:25 Page - 29 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 31.68 51 -6892224 -5 159978 108540241 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 27,406.24 51- 4621797 -2 159979 108638749 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 246.75 51 -4827232 -6 159980 .108643898 6311.6185 LIGHT & POWER POOL OPERATION 250.69 51- 5634814 -2 159984 108813025 5933.6185 LIGHT & POWER PONDS & LAKES 1,949.66 51- 5547446 -1 159985 108805929 .1628.61 85 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 326.54 51- 6046826 -0 159986 108817366 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 174.81 51 -4156445-0 159987 108777164 - 5932.6185 LIGHT & POWER GENERAL STORM SEWER 125.64 51- 5938955.6 159988 108814990 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS 154.37 51- 6229265 -9 159989 108821265 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 767.61 51-6229265 -9 159989 108821265 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,215.47 51- 4159265 -8 160289 108486562 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 18,268.60 514888627 -1 160313 109161639 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDGIGROUNDS 361.28 51-6137136 -8 160314 109190351 5430.6185 LIGHT & POWER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 5,344.91 51.4966303 -6 160315 109166468 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 966.04 51- 5847121 -6 160425 109365194 5914.6185 LIGHT & POWER TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 58,638.17 296910 5/10/2007 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 131.29 APR USAGE - PARK & REC 00004322 159981 024655132 1550.6406. GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 27.30 APR USAGE - BLDG/ENG 00004322 159982 024655131 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 489.06 APR USAGE - ADMIN 00004060 159983 024655130 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 119.68 MARCH USAGE 160134 024364544 5110.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 222.94 FAX DRUM 160247 198757199 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 990.27 1,006,379.69 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,006,379.69 Total Payments 1,006,379.69 R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 318,912.91 02100 CDBG FUND 2,925.00 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 2,669.69 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 72,321.88 05100 ART CENTER FUND 3,470.97 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 9,818.37 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 38,933.99 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 29,416.99 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 8,166.08 05800 LIQUOR FUND 211,470.57 05900 UTILITY FUND 302,273.24 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 1,261.74 05950 RECYCLING FUND 46.37 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 4,691.89 Report Totals 1,006,379.69 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 51412007 - 5/10/2007 We confirm to the best of our bwwledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edka pig polici and solle 5/9/2007 14:54:18 Page- 1 Page 1 of 1 Susan Heiberg From: Laura Fulton Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 1:41 PM To: 'jhovland @krauserollins.com'; 'scot.housh @willis.com'; 'ANN SWENSON; 'jonibennett12 @comcast.net'; 'Immasica @aol.com' Cc: Susan Heiberg Subject: FW: Attention --Todd Park issues- Please forward to the City Council From: barbara karoli [mailto:bkaroli @yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2007 9:31 PM To: Laura Fulton Subject: Attention- -Todd Park issues- Please forward to the City Council 5/6/07 TO: City Council FROM: Barbara Karoli -5232 Hollywood Road RE: Todd Park and the Hockey Rink. I am very concerned that the voice of the Todd Park residence was heard by the Park Board and I am asking the City Council to intervene and resolve this mistake. The Park Board has had two years to figure out an appropriate solution. The lack of rink attendance records is an issue of great concern. Questions regarding the rink's impact on the neighborhood cannot be accurately answered by a survey sent to over 600 people. And, in addition to considering a rink at Todd, other options they considered were: reinstalling the rink at Countryside, a second rink at either Pamela or Lewis, and, of course, maintaining the temporary boards at Todd. Yet, they chose the one option with the greatest negative impact. The City Council must hold the Park Board accountable to justify the decision they made. Also, why are the temporary boards still standing? Minneapolis and the other suburbs have removed their temporary boards over 2 months ago. The same situation happened last year. What is holding up the removal of the boards? The neighborhood would like to use the park during these beautiful days to play baseball, soccer, fly kites and simply enjoy the park. I look forward to attending the City Council Meeting on 6/5/07 and listening to the decision that the Todd Park neighborhood has been heard and that the Park Board is held accountable. Ahhh ... imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check out new cars at Yahoo! Autos.. 5/7/2007 May 9, 2007 Mayor and City Council City of Edina Dear Mayor and Council members My wife and I lived in the Morningside area since before Morningside was annexed to Edina. We chose this area because of it's unique character, most of the homes were built prior to the mid 1930's and most 1500 to 2000 square feet in area, a few are larger. Lately we have been invaded by mega homes of 3000 or more square feet on 50 foot wide lots with minimal green space, these homes are destroying the integrity of the area.. Is there any way this random growth of mega homes can be controlled? Thank ou for your consideration of this matter Sandy an eg Murphy 4311 Morningside Road Edina, MN 55416 Dear Mrs. Bennett, I am a Normandole parent who walks my children to school every day across the Benton Ave bridge. I have spoken with Wayne Houle about getting a pedestrian crosswalk at the intersection of Valley View and Benton and would like you to follow up on my request. This is a very dangerous intersection both for cars and pedestrians. The cars turning right do so without stopping but often show no indication of their turn, so predicting when it is safe to cross is just that, a prediction. Often when I am crossing with my children cars are comming straight across the intersection trying to "make time" when there are no cars coming on Benton, oblivious to the fact there are pedestrians in the road. I even .had a woman get angry with me for crossing in front of her car while she was waiting at the stop sign. To have such an intersection in a school zone is very unfortunate as it keeps a number of parents I have spoken with from waking the 1 mile or so to school. The pedestrian bridge is not practical as it would require the children to walk along the 100 entrance /exit ramp to get across Benton. I have heard that one of Edina's goals it to make this city more pedestrian friendly. Making it safe to walk to school is a very good step in that direction. It also encourages the much needed exercise our children are lacking. Please support me in my push for a pedestrian crosswalk at the Benton bridge. With your help this obvious addition to a school zone, for safety of the school children, will become a reality for fall. There has been talk of not bussing children within a mile of school. This is not an option if they cannot safely walk or ride their bikes to school. This crosswalk would also serve those waiting at the bus stop at the intersection as well as the Edina High School teams that run daily through that area. Thank you. Andrea Bender 6149 Code Ave Edina 55436 952 - 285 -9856 oedbender@hotmaii.com Page 1 of 1 Susan Heiberg From: Laura Fulton Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 8:48 AM To: Jhovland @krauserollins.com'; 'scot.housh @willis.com'; 'Immasica @aol.com'; 'ANN SWENSON'; 'jonibennettl 2 @comcast.net' Cc: Susan Heiberg Subject: FW: message for city council - watering From: Joanne Bolduc [mailto:joannebol @integraonline.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2007 8:43 AM To: Laura Fulton Subject: message for city council - watering Dear Council Members, I have read that there is a proposed ban on watering between 1 -5 p.m. I don't know if this only applies to lawn or to gardens as well. I do not water my lawn, but I have extensive gardens that do need water. As you may know, evening is not a good time to water plants because the water can create problems if it stays on foliage over night. It is not possible for me to hand water all my plants and tend to their other needs. Soaker hoses are not an option — to pricey to replace a number of hoses. If there is an exception for gardens /shrubs, please let me know. If there is not, please consider one. Thank you Joanne Bolduc 7001 West Shore Drive Edina, MN 55435 952- 924 -0850 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.5/792 - Release Date: 5/6/2007 9:01 PM 5/8/2007 Susan Heiberg -tom: Laura Fulton it: Monday, May 07, 2007 1:48 PM 'jhovland @krauserollins.com'; 'scot.housh @willis.com'; 'Immasica @aol.com; 'ANN SW ENSON'; 'jonibennettl2 @comcast.net' Cc: Susan Heiberg Subject: FW: Todd Park. pis forward it to City council. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Albert Walla [mailto:medeafie @hotmail.com] Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2007 10:40 AM To: Laura Fulton Cc: medeafie @hotmail.com Subject: Todd Park. pis forward it to City council. Dear City Council, Please do not ignore us. For two years, we have been watching the Todd Park rink watched the guy watering the rink every morning. I see very few skaters there daily. More than half of time, the rink was empty. Sometimes the rink had a few people. It was very rare that the rink was packed but only a few hours. Often the weather was good for skaters but the rink was empty anyway. The weather sometimes was so cold too warm. No one was there. We had to pay the workers. The skaters zre not there. I would like to know how much do we pay for the workers. The Todd Park is small. The playground is small. Is it necessary to have a huge ice rink there ? ?? I was open about the Ice Rink. Not anymore. I got a nasty note from Jeff Johnson. He was so mean when he sent me the message. It was uncalled for his behavior. I strongly encourage you to vote AGAINST the rink. I will be at the meeting. I will fight. You have the power. Please don't misuse the power for the few people. Thanks, Albert Walla Download Messenger. Join the I'm Initiative. Help make a difference today. http://im.live.com/messenger/im/home/?source=TASHM—APRO7 1 What a wastelll I have Kristi Anderson 4140 West 44th Street ''dins, Minnesota 55424 April 25, 2007 The Honorable James Hovland and Edina City Council Members Joni Bennett, Scot Housh, Linda Masica and Ann Swenson Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council Members, I am writing to invite each of you, as well as any members who are appointed to the newly established Edina Environment Commission, to attend a seminar entitled, "Sustainability and the Natural Step Framework: A Win - Win -Win for Business, Our Community and the Earth" which will be held on May 20 at Lake Harriet United Methodist Church. Please see the enclosed flyers and agendas for details about the seminar. I attended a seminar last fall and believe that it is a great opportunity for our community to come together to ;arn about sustainability and the innovative, cost - saving Natural Step Framework and to develop a shared vision and create a sustainability action plan for our personal lives, workplaces, congregations and community. As a resident of Edina, I believe the seminar is well timed in light of the recent establishment of the Environment Commission and the impending revision of the City's Comprehensive Plan. I invited the seminar presenter, Terry Gips, to speak for an hour at Lake Harriet United Methodist Church in January. About forty people attended his presentation that day — the largest group I've seen for different speakers filling similar time slots. Following his presentation, people specifically requested a full -blown seminar. I have received many comments from attendees of his presentation that day and all of them were extremely favorable. The combination of my personal desire to help spread the message in Mr. Gips' presentation and my perception that there is a great desire by people for this information at this particular time is what has motivated me to organize this event. I hope there is an interest from the City of Edina in this information. Because I've been able to secure several sponsorships for this event, there are more scholarships available than usual. Attendance will be limited to between forty and fifty people. If you are interested in attending, please contact the Alliance for Sustainability (see flyer) to register and/or inquire about scholarships. Please feel free to contact me as well at either 952 928 9027 or kristiotoofarnorth.com if I can be of any assistance. Thank you. Sincerely, Kristi Anderson i Can we create a healthy, sustainable future for our children? Does environmental responsibility have to cost more or mean a lesser lifestyle? Can business thrive while becoming sustainable? Best Buy, Inc. ___._.__ nF; Linden Hills Dentistry, Birch Clothing, Whole Foods Market, 3ke Harriet United Methodist Church, Congregations Caring for Creation, esponsible Minnesota Business, Environmental Assistance -MN Pollution Control Agency, and The Alliance for Sustainability are pleased to present Sustainability and the Natural Step Framework: A Win- Win -Win for Business, Our Community and the Earth This seminar provides an innovative, successful, and cost - effective approach for becoming environmentally and socially responsible based on consensus and systems thinking. Its purpose is to present a common framework comprised of easily- understood, scientifically -based principles that can serve as a compass to guide society toward a just and sustainable future. Thursday May 24, 2007 8:30 a.m. — 4:30 p.m. 8 am - Registration and Fair Trade Organic Coffee Noon - Optional Organic Lunch Lake Harriet United Methodist_ Church, 4901 Chowen Avenue South, Minneapolis (a few blocks north and east of 501h & France) RSVP Requested and Advanced Registration Discount: $95 ($75 for contributing members of Alliance and other sponsors) if payment received by Friday, May 11. $10 additional after and $20 additional at the door if space is available. A limited number of scholarships are available. If you can't come to the afternoon session, you can come another time. Fee includes all resource materials. Contact: Alliance for Sustainability, 612- 331 -1099, info(k,)afors.org; www.afors.org Presenter: Terry Gips is an economist, ecologist, Adjunct Professor at the Minneapolis College of Art & Design, author (Breaking the Pesticide Habit and The Humane Consumer and Producer Guide), President of the Alliance for Sustainability and head of Sustainability Associates, a Minneapolis environmental consulting firm. Terry is one of the first US NSF trainers (independent) and has served as a White House and Congressional aide, co- founder of the Sacramento Community Garden Program, Cargill economist, and Aveda Sustainability Director. He worked with St. Joan of Arc Church on their award - winning $2.7 million green building renovation. So why be hopeful? Because we can create new jobs, restore our environment and promote social stability. The solutions are creative, practical and profitable. - Paul Hawken, Author and Founding Chair of the Natural Step -US I will think differently about everything I touch, buy, use, taste and see. - Lauren Pace, Communications Supervisor, Eileen Fisher, Inc. r This is a great seminar that could fill an auditorium. I will train co- workers on the viability of these principles. - Bart Potenza, Owner, Candle Cafe, NY Why attend? Through a fun, positive, interactive and inspiring format led by a nationally recognized sustainability leader, you'll learn what sustainability is, the innovative, proven and cost - effective Natural Step Framework (NSF), and how to apply it. The NSF is used by small and large businesses, communities, government agencies, architectural firms, academic and religious institutions, hospitals, farmers, nonprofits and individuals. They build safer, healthier environments, save money, reduce waste, improve performance, encourage innovative thinking, attract and retain employees, create jobs, obtain funding, gain strategic position, meet ISO 14000, eliminate regulatory burdens, and build teams. They create positive, shared solutions, while becoming environmentally and socially responsible. You'll also explore the revolutionary work of Manfred Max -Neef that shows how we can meet the fundamental needs of every person, help address our consumption addiction or "affluenza," and transform our lives and planet. You will never see things the same. Open to a whole new world beyond the "pollution prevention and recycling" approach, one that will strategically reposition your life and organization. Discover a sense of hope, new possibilities and the know -how to make it happen. The Natural Step Framework in Practice In only 18 years, the Natural Step framework has been utilized in numerous countries by: • Hundreds of businesses, including Starbucks, Home Depot, Nike, Bank of America, CH2M Hill Engineers, White Bear Racquet & Swim, Baltix Furniture, Lakewinds Natural Foods, the world's largest manufacturers of appliances (Electrolux), furniture (IKEA) and commercial floor coverings (Interface), Sweden's largest hotel and supermarket chains, biggest oil company, and McDonald's. • Government agencies such as the State of Oregon, US Army and Navy, more than 70 municipalities (both rural towns and cities like Stockholm, Santa Monica, and Whistler), hospitals (Ridgeview Medical Center), and schools such as the University of Texas, Houston. • Religious institutions, such as the Basilica of St. Mary and St. Joan of Arc Church in Minneapolis. • More than 500,000 young people through the Swedish Youth Parliament for Sustainability. • Thousands of organic and conventional farmers whose NSF consensus process helped shift toward a sustainable agriculture, saving money and reducing pesticide use 75 %. Background of the Natural Step As a scientist at Sweden's leading cancer research institute, physician Dr. Karl -Henrik Robert was concerned that increasing cancer rates, especially among young children like those he was treating, were tied to environmental factors. He was frustrated by the lack of agreement among scientists about the cause or what to do, so he began a consensus process which resulted in 50 leading Swedish scientists agreeing on the underlying principles needed for sustainability. This information was then shared with major corporations who recognized the need for action. They supported the sending of an audiocassette and brochure to every home and school in Sweden - -4.3 million. Leading artists, musicians and scientists produced a national TV special in 1989 to launch an educational campaign. The Natural Step became a nonprofit backed by the King of Sweden. My mission is to transform my company into a sustainable business --one that does well by doing good- -by using the principles of the Natural Step framework. - Ray Anderson, CEO, Interface, Inc., Atlanta, GA Thank you for providing a path to sustainability that is not overwhelming, I but completely possible for all of us to use in all aspects of our lives. -- Brenda Adams, Mediator - Resolution Consultant Agenda for Natural Step Framework (NSF) Seminar Thursday, May 24, 2007 8 am Registration & Organic, Fair Trade Coffee 8:30 am Welcome, Introductions, What is Sustainability and Summary Overview of NSF Visioning, Story of NSF, Systems Thinking and Basic Science - We move beyond the complexity of details to system principles and shared models and goals. We then examine the scientific principles governing life on Earth: conservation of matter, the second law of thermodynamics, material quality and the role of green cells. We look at evolution, natural cycles and the planet's present status. The NSF Four Principles for Sustainability - We examine the implications and opportunities of the four principles for sustainability, including the powerful explanatory tools of Material Flow Theory and Manfred Max - Neef's revolutionary fundamental needs analysis, which address both social and environmental considerations. Noon Optional Organic Lunch (if reserved in advance) and Lunchtime Exercise Applying Four NSF Principles 1 pm Discuss Exercise, Benefits and Status of the NSF - After firming up our understanding of the NSF, we explore the benefits from applying the NSF principles or costs from ignoring them as well as which businesses, communities and institutions are using it. Case Studies — We'll examine how the NSF is used by other businesses, communities, and academic and religious institutions, including slides from Sweden. Practical Application — In what most describe as the highlight of the seminar, participants meet in small groups to apply what they have learned to an actual project in their organization, community, or home with the ABCD process and develop a sustainability action plan. Group Reports, Dialogue, Questions, Evaluation, and Next Steps 4:30 pm Closing The laws of Congress and the laws of physics have grown divergent, and the laws of physics are not likely to yield. -- Author Bill McKibben I feel more enlightened and inspired to promote sustainability as a feasible and intelligent option, if not a necessity to living. - Tiffany Finley, Denison University, Granville, OH It Natural Step Framework Principles for Sustainability (in bold) The Natural Step Framework holds that in a sustainable society, nature won't be subject to systematically increasing: 1 ... Concentrations of substances extracted from the earth's crust — This addresses what we take from the Earth, including the mining of metals and burning of fossil fuels. We need to use renewable energy and nontoxic, reusable materials. 2 ... Concentrations of substances produced by society — This addresses what we make: chemicals, plastics and other substances. We need to use safe, biodegradable substances. 3 ... Degradation by physical means — This addresses what we do to the Earth, including biodiversity and ecosystems. We need to protect our soils, water and air. And, in that society, 4 ... human needs are met worldwide. This addresses social concerns and utilizes the powerful, widely -used fundamental needs analysis of Chilean economist Manfred Max -Neef to show how it's possible to use less stuff and save money while meeting the needs of every person. I got really great information I will pass on in my company and with family and friends. I now have many short and long -term plans personally and professionally. -- Melissa Brown Blaeuer, Manager, KPMG LLP Sustainability Associates is a consulting firm working with business, government and communities to achieve cost savings, performance and ecological and social responsibility through leading edge sustainability thinking, eco- auditing, Natural Step framework and personal sustainability seminars, and capital formation. Terry Gips, 9000 W. 28th St., St. Louis Park, MN 55426 612 - 374 -4765 Tgipsnsu stainability associates .com www .sustainabil_itvassociates.com The Alliance for Sustainability is a nonprofit working to bring about sustainability on a personal, organizational and planetary level with communities, congregations, and citizens /consumers, including Seminars on the NS Framework and Personal Sustainability, Sustainability Awards, Living Green Expo, Sustainable Communities, and Congregations Caring for Creation. In the Hillel Center at the University of Minnesota, 1521 University Ave. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55414 T: 612 - 331 -1099 info(i?afors.org www.afors.org For a strategy person like myself, this program makes so much sense and will enable business to be more competitive and responsive. - Janet Morgan, Director of Non - Profit Services, RSM McGladrey HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION TUESDAY, MARCH 27, 2007 7:00 PM - MAYOR'S CONFERENCE ROOM Members Present Luis Bartolomei Emery Erickson Idelle Longman Debby McNeil JoAnn McGuire Sharon Ming Andy Otness Wayne Prochniak Members Absent Mary Brindle Lindah Mhando Hamdi Yusuf Staff Susan Heiberg Regarding the untimely death of new Member Michael Stolee, funeral information was shared. On behalf of the Commission, a card will be sent to his wife, Marilyn. For the sake of new Member JoAnn McGuire, introductions were made all around. Member McGuire is the Development Director of the Minnesota Justice Foundation. Approval of Minutes Member Erickson seconded Member Longman's motion to approve the minutes of February 27, 2007; the motion carried. _ Tom Oye Human Rights Award The Commissioners discussed the candidate, Ellen Kennedy, submitted by the Rotary Club. Ellen has a passion about human rights and raising awareness. I As a professor at St. Thomas, she empathized with her students about the current genocide situation in Darfur Sudan. As a result, she helped create a local chapter of GI.Net (Genocide Intervention Network), which is now the official chapter for the State of Minnesota. The Commission agreed that Ellen's work fits within the criteria of the Award, which is reflective of Tom Oye. However, this candidate does not work directly within the community. She strives to open up new chapters at other colleges, is legislatively active, and has brought,,people from Israel to meet with leaders in the Twin Cities. The Commissioners will seek additional ways to market this award again next fall. In the meantime, the process will be discussed at the next meeting in April. Member Bartolomei seconded Member Prochniak's motion to present the 2007 Tom Oye Human Rights Award to Ellen Kennedy; the motion carried. The presentation will be made at the City's Volunteer Recognition. Reception at Edinborough Park on April 24. Additionally, Ellen will be invited to attend an upcoming Commission meeting. Review of Funding Proposals The Commissioners reviewed the proposal for human services funding for 2008. The first page will be updated to reflect pertinent, timely information. It will be sent out at the beginning of May to the providers currently funded, posted on the City's website and printed in the Sun - Current. The date for submission of proposals will be June 4�. Community Development Block Grant Funding A grid of CDBG funding by the City for the past 16 years was shared with the Commission. JVS, a division of Jewish Family & Children's Service of Minneapolis, will be contacted at the. end of the. summer or early fall regarding their utilization of funds for child -care programs. The Commissioners agreed to connect earlier next time with all the providers who receive the City's CDBG funding. Commission Brochure Y Vice Chair McNeil distributed a list of information to be considered for inclusion in a new Commission brochure. It was agreed that the Bias/Hate Crime Brochure should be mentioned but that all its information should not be duplicated in the new Commission brochure. A tri -fold brochure was considered a good choice. The. Commissioners will have a chance to react to a draft at the next meeting. League of Women Voters Study As a result of the study conducted by the League of Women Voters of Edina,. names of advisory members on the City's boards and commissions will be available on the City website, as well as a general e-mail address for questions. The Commissioners suggested that it might also be helpful to include wording from the.new brochure on the Commission's site. Information Sharing and Next Meeting • The Commission needs a report on the progress of the Comprehensive. Plan I pdate regarding the housing component. • At the City Council workshop regarding boards and commissions, it was validated that a student member may vote on HRRC. • Member Longman reported that the League of Minnesota Human Rights Commissions will hold its 2007 conference on September 29' at the Mille Lacs Grand Casino. • Gregg Aamot recently spoke to Rotary about his book The New Minnesotans. It was suggested that he be invited to the next Commission meeting. • Due to the next Commission meeting falling on the same night at the Volunteer Recognition Reception, the meeting will begin at 7:30 PM. Adiournment There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9:00 PM. Respectfully submitted, Debby McNeil, 1n Vice Chair Edina Human Rights & Relations Commission DM/sh oi MINUTES OF THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD TUESDAY, APRIL 10, 2007, AT 7:00 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL - COMMUNITY ROOM 4801 (NEST 50T" LTREET MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Bob Kojetin; Chris Rofidal, Laura Benson, Nancy Scherer, Lou Blemaster, Connie Fukuda, Jean Rehkamp Larson, and Sara Rubin MEMBERS ABSENT: Karen Ferrara STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner OTHERS PRESENT: Robert Vogel, Preservation Consultant Kitty O'Dea, 4610 Bruce Avenue I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: March 13, 2007 Member Rofidal moved approval of the Minutes from the March 13, 2007 meeting. Member Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. II. COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT - RE- SURVEY PROGRESS REPORT: Consultant Vogel reported that during the month of March, information was compiled about the architectural history of garages in general, as well as data on the types of garages that were built in, the Country Club district during its period of historical significance. He explained that some of the more interesting "tidbits" include: • Purpose -built garages first appeared soon after the invention of the automobile (before 1910, most cars were stored in horse stables or sheds) - the word itself is French, from garer, which originally meant "to put something in a place where it will be protected" but by late 1800's was commonly used to describe a covered place used to shelter railroad cars • The first architect - designed automobile garage for a single family residence appears to have been built in 1912; the architect who designed it referred to the structure as "a new type of outbuilding" similar to the traditional carriage house • The "up- and - over" folding garage door was invented in 1921 and the first electric garage door opener appeared on the market in 1926 • From old photographs; it appears that the first generation of detached garages in the Country Club District were anything but "carriage houses " — Minutes — April 10, 2007 Edina Heritage Preservation Board the great majority appear to have been quite basic and utilitarian, really little more than undecorated sheds designed to protect an automobile from the elements • According to trade magazines, attached or semi - attached garages first construction until after World War II The front - loading "tuck- under' attached garage was widely touted in home builder magazines published in the 1940's as a construction cost - saving innovation, as well as a modern convenience that also saved space in the backyard • Prefabricated garages and mail -order garage plans have been available since the early 1900's ( "garage kits" began appearing in the Sears catalog around 1928), but they did not enjoy widespread popularity until the 1950's • Two -car garages were not the norm for new home construction in the Twin Cities until the late 1960's judging from newspaper ads, some home builders continued to offer single -stall garages right up until the early 1970's • According to studies by urban anthropologists and the home remodeling industry, the typical suburban family usually cannot store all of its personal vehicles in their garage (particularly if it was built prior to 1960), while roughly 1/3 of all the attached garages built before 1970 have been converted to dens, game rooms, and other living space; sociological research also strongly supports the conventional notion that as the kitchen is the domain of women, garages are male strongholds with their own distinctive social life and etiquette As the re- survey progresses, several historical and architectural themes have been discovered that were not recognized in the 1980 National Register registration document or subsequent local history publications. For example, it appears that the original development plan for the district placed more emphasis on landscape features and streetscape qualities than had been previously understood. It is also now apparent that the houses in the district are characterized by two major-phases of development, the first in the late 1920's, with another pulse of building in the late 1930's and 1940's; each cycle of home building appears to be represented by distinctive kinds of houses in different parts of the district. Mr. Vogel added that preparations are being made for members of the HPB to more actively participate in the survey by recording information -about the physical development of individual homes based on property tax assessment data. Volunteers and city staff are also expected to play a critical role in the review and organization of survey data as the survey progresses. Discussion ensued regarding the upcoming work of the Board. All agreed that a work session before the regular HPB meeting fits well with their schedules. 2 Minutes — April 10, 2007 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Planner Repya agreed to schedule time prior to the May 8t' meeting when the Board can receive training on how to fill in the property information cards. No formal action was taken. r'ni '0"M / rI 1rf j^ TrS! ^T 7 r !�r� e S Planner Repya reported that.the joint meeting with the City Council on Tuesday, _April 3rd went very well. The Council was supportive of the work the HPB has outlined for the coming year. There was also consensus that the policy to restrict the teardown of a home in the Country Club District built prior to 1951 was a step in the right direction. There was.agreement.that until the research of the Country Club District is complete, the Plan of Treatment should not be changed — the rationale being that once the re -survey is complete; in addition to the teardown issue, subjects such as driveways, grading, etc., should also be addressed. That being the case....the Council agreed it would be wise to put a moratorium in place for the teardown of homes in the District built prior to 1951. Members Kojetin, Rofidal and Rehkamp- Larson, commented that they were pleased with the dialogue.... the City Council members appeared very supportive and appreciative of the HPB initiatives. Ms. Repya then presented the proposed ordinance addressing the moratorium for the Board to review; explaining that City Manager, Gordon Hughes is planning on presenting the proposed moratorium to the City Council at their next meeting, on April 17th. Discussion ensued regarding the proposed ordinance. The response of the Board was positive, however, there was confusion with the definition of the term "Demolition ": Demolition means: (1) to tear down or remove any part of the front street fagade of a dwelling, or (2) to remove and replace the roof structure that changes the pitch of the roof, or (3) to tear down .more than 50% of,the dwelling. Some felt that item #1 addressing the front street facade was not clear and may be difficult to administer. Some questions that were raised include: What is controlled? How will the review be administered? What if a building permit is not required — who will oversee this? Member Benson suggested that language be added to identify those changes that would require a building or demolition permit. Member Scherer observed that the language in this ordinance is only for the period of the moratorium. After the survey is complete, the Plan of Treatment will be revised to reflect both the results of the survey as well as the activity in the District over the moratorium period. 3 Minutes — April 10; 2007 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Planner Repya stated that she will share the Board's concerns and comments with . the City Attorney and Planning Staff as they work on fine tuning the proposed ordinance prior to presenting it to the City Council. Planner Repya explained that thus far one nomination for the 2007 Heritage Award has been received for the Ralph Rapson house at 4729 Annaway Drive. The deadline for nominations is Friday, April 13th. Robert Vogel added that a second nomination is forthcoming for the Sly House at 6128 Brookview Avenue. Member Blemaster stated that she understands that the current owner of the Rapson property, while very flattered, currently does not have the time to address the award. However, Ms. Blemaster has spoken with Jodi Peterson, the former owner of the home, who was responsible for the renovation project. Ms. Peterson has offered to arrange a tour of the home for the HPB with the current owner. All agreed that would be important. Planner Repya cautioned that the timing for the presentation of the award on May 15th is very short, and since it is important that the owner of the property be part of the process perhaps that should be taken into consideration with this nomination. General discussion ensued. Chairman Kojetin offered to contact the owners of the Sly House to further discuss the Heritage Award. No formal action was taken. V. RECENT LEGISLATIVE ACTION: - Historic Preservation Tax Credit Consultant Vogel provided an update on the status of the Historic Preservation Tax Credit bill (SF 385), explaining that the bill was left out of the Omnibus Tax Bill passed by the Senate Tax Committee last week, but may be included in the House's Omnibus Tax Bill (see HF 1240). Edina's Ron Erhardt is NOT one of the bill's cosponsors, but is a member of the House Tax Committee — his stance on the tax credit legislation is not clear. Vogel pointed out that the proposed state tax credit would provide a 25% state income tax credit for qualified historic rehabilitation projects involving historic commercial and residential properties. He added that the Federal investment tax credit (ITC) that has been on the books since the 1970s provides a 20% income tax credit for rehabilitation of income - producing properties. The projects must be certified by the state historic preservation officers and, of course, most also meet the requirements of the IRS. The Historic Homeowners Assistance Act has been introduced in Congress but never had a vote -- it would extend the commercial property ITC to residential properties. 4 Minutes — April 10, 2007 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Generally, properties qualify for the preservation tax incentives (state and federal) if they are listed in the National Register or are located in a locally designated historic district. Vogel further stated that as he understands the proposal, Minnesota tax credit legislation would apply to individually designated heritage landmarks in cities that are Certified Local Governments. Board members thanked Mr. Vogel for the information and expressed a desire to be kept up to date on the legislation. They added that if a letter of support from the Board would be advisable, they would be in favor providing that. Vogel stated that he would keep the Board posted. No formal action was taken. VI. NATIONAL TRUST CONFERENCE — Field Session Planning: Consultant Vogel explained that on May 15th he will take the staff of the National Trust on a dry run of the Edina tour which will be offered as part of their National Conference on October 4th. The tour should take approximately 3 hours, and once he receives feedback from the Trust, he will bring their reactions back to the HPB. Chairman Kojetin expressed an interest in joining the dry run on May 15th. The Board agreed that they looked forward to showcasing historic Edina to the National Trust conference. No formal action was taken. VII. OTHER BUSINESS: Comprehensive Plan Update — Member Rofidal advised the Board that the City is in the midst of updating the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, and as part of the process, providing workshop opportunities for Edina residents to add their input. Rofidal stated that he has attended two workshops thus far and was surprised at the low attendance. He encouraged his fellow Board members to be part of the planning process by attending the remaining workshops. Planner Repya thanked Member Rofidal for his announcement, and explained that the date for the next workshop had not been set; however, when that information is available, she offered to keep the HPB. advised. Board members thanked Member Rofidal for the information and expressed an interest in being kept in the loop. VIII. CONCERN OF RESIDENTS: Kitty O'Dea —.4610 Bruce Avenue provided the following comments: She thanked the Board for taking a stance on the tear down of homes in the Country Club District by proposing the moratorium on demolitions. She offered assistance from the Country Club neighborhood on work involved with the survey of the neighborhood. She expressed frustration with the construction of the home to her north (4608 Bruce Avenue); explaining that the materials being used, while 5 Minutes — April 10, 2007 Edina Heritage Preservation Board consistent with what was on the plans, look different than what was expected. She asked the Board to' consider "expectation .management', addressing a better explanation of building terminology to the lay person. .111:. Board would take them under advisement. IX. CORRESPONDENCE: None X. NEXT MEETING DATE: May 8, 2007 (5:00 p.m. for survey work session) XI. ADJOURNMENT 8:25 p.m. Respectfully submitted, ` Joyce R.epya Minutes of the Edina Park Board Tuesday, April 10, 2007 Edina City Hall Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Andy Finsness, Mike Damman, Ray O'Connell, Carolyn Nelson, Howard Merriam, Randy Meyer, Jeff Sorem, Todd Fronek, Linda Presthus, George Klus, Karla Sitek STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton, Vince Cockriel I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES George Klus MOVED TO APPROVE THE MARCH 13, 2007 PARK BOARD MINUTES. Howard Merriam SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. II. NEW BUSINESS A. Todd Park Hockey Rink - Mr. Keprios summarized his staff report and gave a brief history of Todd Park. He stated that it is staff's recommendation to continue to provide eleven outdoor hockey rinks in the system, regardless of where the rinks are located. In addition, it is staff's recommendation to make all eleven of those hockey rinks permanent. Mr. Keprios went through the pros and cons of placing a hockey rink at Todd Park. He stressed that a decision needs to be made prior to July 1St. Either they purchase the portable boards for an additional $10,900 or they return them by July 1St Richard Miller, 5340 Hollywood Road, indicated that he does not play golf, use the swimming pools or gymnasiums. However, he is glad to pay for them. He stated that because these are all great enhancements in the community it is interpreted as an increased value in their properties. He noted that he doesn't think you can be serious about outdoor recreation if you don't have both organized and unorganized outdoor hockey. He stated that he would like to see the City maintain this big asset for the community at Todd Park. , Katie Meehan, 5229 Hollywood Road, indicated that the neighborhood is not against hockey, it's just the idea of having'permanent boards in such a small space. Pat Cronin, 11 Cooper Avenue, stated that the city is already vested in Todd Park and therefore feels they. should maximize that investment and keep the hockey rink at Todd Park. Tim Meehan, 5229 Hollywood Road, stated that he thinks the duty of the Park Board is to determine what the best use of that park space is. He pointed out that if it wasn't for the comfort station, Todd Park would be the least ideal place to put a hockey rink. He stressed that there is barely any grass left and by putting up permanent boards it would be the worst use of that space. Jeff Bauers, 12 Cooper Avenue, stated that he can guarantee that more people are using the space at Todd Park in the winter with the hockey boards. If the boards weren't there in the winter it would be open white space that would not be used. Nancy Hall, 4501 Parkside Lane, stated that she can attest to the noise because she lives there. She indicated that she is confused because there are other less attractive areas that have on -site parking, why choose Todd Park. Todd Park is completely . surrounded by residents on all four sides and there is no available parking. Andy Halper, 4437 Rutledge Avenue, stated that the hockey rink does get used. However, in order for everyone to be able to enjoy the green space that is there the way nature intended it to be, the hockey boards needs to be portable. Mr. Meyer asked how much does it cost to put the boards up and take them down annually. Mr. Cockriel replied that he has not calculated it to the dollar but it does take a crew of four to six the better part of a week to put them up. Taking them down is a lot quicker, it takes a crew of eight approximately seven hours. In addition, it takes that similar amount of time to put up a permanent rink in the rest of the system as it does that one rink. Mr. Merriam asked when do the boards typically go up and when are they taken down. Mr. Cockriel replied that they try to put them up the last part of October and take them out the first part of May. A lot does depend on weather conditions. Mr. Fronek asked what does it cost to build a permanent rink. Mr. Cockriel replied approximately $25,000 which includes labors, fencing, materials, etc. Mr. Merriam asked what has been the hockey experience with the plastic boards. Mr. Soren replied that he did play hockey at Todd Park this past winter and he doesn't think the quality of the plastic boards is very good. The boards were warped after one year of use. After this past year the boards were starting to concave which would make the puck bounce off in all different directions as well as actually leave the rink, which could become a safety issue. Mr. Klus indicated that he doesn't have a problem if the boards are permanent or portable. He noted that he does think, however, that the hockey rink should stay there because of all of the reasons they've debated in the past. Mr. Klus stated that his biggest concern is when this was discussed a couple of years ago and a recommendation was made to the City Council and they really didn't look at the Park Board's recommendation. The City Council went on and did what they felt was best. He commented that he doesn't want to spend a lot of time debating this issue if it's- going to the City Council and the City Council is going to decide. again. Mr. Klus indicated that he thinks whatever recommendation the Park Board puts on the floor he would encourage that part of it state that if the City Council is not in agreement with this that they will send it back to the Park Board. If it means they have to hold a E special meeting to look at the concerns of the City Council and send a second recommendation back to the City Council. Mr. Klus stressed that he wants to make sure that the time they spend on this debate is worth their while do so. Ms. Sitek stated that she thinks the hockey rink needs to remain at Todd Park whether the boards are permanent or removable. Ms. Presthus commented that she also thinks there should be a hockey rink'a Todd Park. She noted that she is familiar with removable boards and does know their limitations both for safety and quality. Mr. Finsness asked if it costs the same to set up and remove this portable rink compared to a removable rink why not remove a permanent kind of structure every year. Mr. Cockriel replied that if you compare their patented green wood boards to the plastic portable boards, the materials don't hold up on the plastic boards the way they do on the wooden boards. He explained that while the plastic one is a lesser quality to begin with it is made for ease of removal and to put back together. Mr. Cockriel pointed out that this particular plastic portable rink is really a permanent rink that has been rigged to be somewhat portable. Mr. Finsness asked Mr. Cockriel if he thinks his staff could rig a wooden one so that it could be removable. Mr. Cockriel replied that his staff would have to experiment with a little engineering to try and figure out something. He stated that they don't want to get. into a situation where it's taking the same amount of time to put them up and take them down. In addition, year in and year out, the boards will need to be stored and they will take a beating. Mr. Klus asked what the useful life of the temporary boards versus the wooden boards. Mr. Cockriel replied that the wooden ones typically last at least 15 years. He noted that plastic ones will be gone within ten years. The boards are already noticeably warped, they already had issues with stress cracks and they've replaced a bolted stop sign. He stated that another problem with the one piece plastic boards is if you get a nick on the top that board is frozen in there for the winter and interlocked to a point where you can't take it out. He noted that on the permanent wooden boards they can be taken off and fixed within a half hour. Mr. Cockriel pointed out that you are going to have some replacement of the plastic boards each year. He noted that they've already replaced two different sections and currently have a third one that's beyond repair. Mr. O'Connell stated in his opinion the whole question has pretty much been covered for two years and the plastic boards have been what they expected, and it is ineffective use of the Park Department's employees time. He noted that he feels they should return the boards and discontinue their contract and replace the rink with a permanent structure. Mr. Damman stated that there definitely should be a public rink at Todd Park. He stated that if they do decide to put a hockey rink at Todd Park it definitely should have permanent boards. 3 Mr. Sorem indicated that Edina is a hockey based community and he thinks the hockey rink should stay at Todd Park and should have the permanent wooden boards. He stated that during the summer the kids do play inside of the boards as Mr. Keprios previously mentioned. Ms. Nelson noted that she agrees, there should be permanent hockey rink at Todd Park. Mr. Fronek stated that he agrees there needs to be a hockey rink with permanent boards at Todd Park. However, if there is some way to make it less of an "eyesore" by putting in some landscape to sort of hide the rink from some of the neighboring houses it would probably be worth looking into. Mr. Klus indicated that he would like to hear more about staff designing some type of portable structure that they would be happy with putting in and taking out each year. Since they are obviously leaning towards some type of permanent structure it's important for the Park Board to hear about it. Mr. Cockriel replied that if they were to get stuck with the portable rink, then he would recommend that they try to design something different. However, whether they can design something that stands up and is safe and sturdy is yet to be seen. Mr. Finsness stated that he thinks they should keep the rink and send staff on a charge to give it their best shot at designing a wooden rink that is removable. He noted this would be a great solution, if it could be done, because he does think it's fair to the people to have some green space during the summer. He commented that he knows this may set precedent, however Todd Park is a little bit different compared to the other parks. Ray O'Connell MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO ELIMINATE THE PLASTIC BOARDS BY DISCONTINUING THE CONTRACT WITH THE ATHLETICA COMPANY FOR THE REMAINDER RECOVERY OF $10,900 WHICH IS DUE ON JULY 1, 2007, AND REPLACE IT WITH A PERMANENT STRUCTURE HOCKEY RINK. George Klus SECONDED THE MOTION. George Klus moved to propose an amendment to the motion to have staff look into and determine whether or not it could be possible to make a removable permanent structure. Mr. O'Connell replied he would like to change possible to feasible. The amendment would read: Have staff come back with a recommendation to the Park Board on whether or not it would be feasible to have wooden boards that could be removed each season. Mr. Klus stated that he would also like it added to the motion that it be brought back to the Park Board within a year to have a discussion about that for the future. Mr. Klus indicated that maybe this should be made a completely different motion. Ms. Presthus stated that they have discussed these options for a non - permanent rink and that is how they came up with the Athletica boards. She commented that they did 4 look at wooden portable boards but they weren't the same quality as the Athletica plastic boards. Ms. Presthus pointed out that all this is doing is pushing them back into the same discussion they had two years ago and ruled out. She stated that she doesn't know what has changed in the last two years to revisit it again. Mr. Keprios reminded the Park Board if they want Todd Park to have a removable board system it is staff's recommendation they make the investment and purchase the plastic boards they have been using. Mr. Klus called the question and asked Ms. Canton to read back the recorded motion: Ray O'Connell MOVED TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO ELIMINATE THE PLASTIC BOARDS BY DISCONTINUING THE CONTRACT WITH THE ATHLETICA COMPANY FOR THE REMAINDER RECOVERY OF $10,900 WHICH IS DUE ON JULY 1, 2007, AND REPLACE IT WITH A PERMANENT STRUCTURE HOCKEY RINK. Mr. O'Connell stated that he would prefer to leave the motion as it is. IN FAVOR: Howard Merriam, George Klus, Mike Damman, Linda Presthus; Karla Sitek, Carolyn Nelson, Jeff Sorem, Todd Fronek, Ray O'Connell OPPOSED: Andy Finsness ABSTAINED: Randy Meyer MOTION CARRIED. B. Edina Park Board Resolution for Support of Bicycling - Mr. Fronk stated the "Edina Park Board Resolution for Support of Bicycling" is fairly self - explanatory and basically puts the City and the Park Board on notice that they support bicycling and they support what the bike task force is trying to do as far as developing a comprehensive bicycle plan throughout the city. He explained that it's more of an instrument that they can send to the City Council and maybe encourage some of the other boards.to pass similar resolutions in order to bring more awareness to biking and to encourage biking throughout the city. Todd Fronek MOVED TO APPROVE THE EDINA PARK BOARD RESOLUTION FOR SUPPORT OF BICYCLING. Mike Damman SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. III. OLD BUSINESS A. Athletic Facilities Fund Raiser Committee/Foundation — George Klus - Mr. Klus informed the Park Board that they did have a good turnout at last month's meeting as well as they came up with a mission statement. He commented that he will have Mr. Keprios include it in the next Park Board packet. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that this is not a school or city driven project. It is a grass roots effort from volunteers and residents within the community. 5 IV. PUBLIC COMMENT There was no public comment. V. UPDATES FROM STAFF A. Athletic Association Presidents Meeting - Mr. Keprios thanked Todd Fronek and Ray O'Connell for attending the meeting. He indicated that one item that was left undone from the Edina Youth Sports Task Force exercise was the insurance mandate question. Mr. Keprios pointed out that they have now come up with a recommendation from administration that they do have a minimum mandate along with a workers compensation mandate if they have employees. Mr. Keprios explained that_ he intends to draft a memo to provide that mandate to all of the athletic association presidents asking them to do their own analysis and their own research. He indicated that Andy Stotts, President of the Edina Soccer Association, has volunteered to coordinate a collaborative effort to kind of leverage the number to get a better premium and calculate what it would cost on a per participant basis in order to determine how much their registration fees may have to go up. B. Comprehensive Plan Update — Mr. Keprios explained that he would like for the Park Board, when they have time, to look over the Comprehensive Plan on a macro level to kind of get the grasp of the big picture; specifically the categories he has identified, and see if this is the direction they ought to be heading and the policies they ought to be adopting as they go down the road. He asked the Park Board that when they have any ideas or thoughts to send him an e -mail and he will collectively keep those and put them in the Park Board packet. He stated that it is a draft and is subject to change. Mr. Keprios indicated that the next step in the process will be to upgrade the guidelines and standards. C. 2007 Tree Planting Projects — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board of the Arbor Day planting that will take place on Friday, April 27`h at 10:00 am on Edina Court. He also handed out the city forester's annual report. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that Edina resident, Jeanne Hanson, recently was successful in acquiring a grant from the Minnehaha Watershed District to do some plantings at Pamela Park. He stated that they will be working with that group in trying to make that happen.. Meeting adjourned at 8:50 pm. 2 The next study phase for the Southwest Transitway is an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), which is likely to take two to three years to complete. During the EIS, the three light rail alternatives will be analyzed in more depth and narrowed down to one which will then pursue federal funding. Assuming consensus is reached on which light rail alternative to pursue, the earliest this line would be operational is the year 2015. 2002 -2004 I000L 2005 -2006 ooh 2007 -2009 ooh 2009 -2011 WO 99 NW `Silode@uuin NU TMIS q19 PON L lV AeM>,ISueii )SBMu)lloS 2011 -2015 F: Volume 4 1 Ap Moving Ahead with LRT! It's fast, it carries a lot of people, and it at- tracts development. Those are just three reasons the Southwest Transitway Policy Advi- sory Committee (PAC) recommended that a Light Rail Transit line for the southwest metro area be pursued. On February 13, 2007, the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Author- ity ( HCRRA) voted unanimously to accept the Southwest Transitway PAC recommenda- tion to proceed with the next study phase, an environmental study, called an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). After a two-year study of transitway alterna- tives, called an Alternatives Analysis (AA), the Southwest Transitway PAC recommended further evaluation of three LRT routes to determine which one best serves southwest metro residents and workers. The three LRT alternatives (LRT IA, LRT 3A, and LRT 3C) were recommended because study findings showed that they were superior at addressing the Southwest Transitway goals of improv- ing mobility, providing a cost - effective and efficient travel option, protecting the envi- ronment, preserving the quality of life, and supporting economic development. (see map inside) The three LRT alternatives also rate well on the cost - effectiveness criteria used to compete for federal funding — which could cover as much as 50% of project costs. BUSINESS ALLIANCE FORMED Four local chambers of commerce recently formed a business collaboration called the Southwest Transitway Alliance to promote the development of a Southwest LRT line. The Twin West Chamber of Commerce, the Eden Prairie Chamber, the Minneapolis Regional Chamber, and the Edina Cham- ber have joined together to provide a unified business voice for the project. One of the Alliance's first tasks is supporting a legislative funding request to pay for a portion of the study phase, the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The Alliance will also work to educate business community and public about this important project and to build support over time. For more information about the Southwest Transitway Alliance, or to add your business to a list of supporters, contact Jason Flohrs, Twin West's director of government affairs, at 763 - 450 -2225, or jasonf @twinwest.com. Before finalizing their recommendations, the Southwest Transitway PAC and the HCRRA sought input from the public. Residents and workers in the southwest metro area were encouraged to share their opinions of moving forward with light rail transit (LRT). Com- munity meetings and open houses were held from October to December 2006 to provide opportunities for the public to hear more about the proposed routes, what makes Light Rail Transit a good fit for the community, and to comment. In addition, the HCRRA held a public hearing on January 23, 2007. Over the next few months the HCRRA will work with its partners to initiate the next study phase, preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The purpose of the EIS is to provide a full and open evaluation of environmental issues and alternatives, and to inform decision - makers and the public of reasonable alternatives that could avoid or minimize adverse impacts and enhance the quality of the environment. Public input is a major part of the EIS process and there- fore, multiple opportunities for input will be provided. Interested citizens should watch for notices of meetings and hearings - public involvement will continue to be essential for the development of a successful LRT line to serve the southwest metro area. The Analysis The Southwest Transitway Alternatives Analysis (AA) is a federally required study whose purpose was to compare the benefits, costs and impacts of a broad range of transitway alternatives in order to determine which best meets the travel needs of the southwest metro area communities and downtown Minneapolis. Transitway alternatives ranging from streetcars to monorail where considered and narrowed down to enhancing the regular bus system, bus rapid transit (BRT), and light rail transit (LRT) for detailed evaluation in the Southwest Transitway AA. One enhanced regular bus, two BRT, and eight LRT alternatives were thoroughly evaluated to determine which were most likely to meet the Southwest Transitway goals of (1) improving mobility, (2) providing a cost - effective and efficient travel option, (3) protecting the environment, (4) preserving quality of life, and (5) support- ing economic development. After thoroughly evaluating the transitway alternatives, three LRT alternatives were recommended for further evaluation during an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), the next study phase. Southwest Transitway Alternatives Evaluation Matrix, Revised following September 27, 2006 PAC Meeting Evaluation Breakpoints Does not support goal 0 Supports goal O Strongly supports goal 121 Supports goal on fewer than 4 of 6 measures Tier 1 Goals Supports goal on 4 Supports goal on 7 of 10 Tier 2 Goals of 6 measures measures 3 of 4 measures Supports goal on all measure. Supports goal on all measures Goal 2: 2015 Capital Cost $865 million Goal 4: Preserve $1.4 billion 2015 Operating Cost Goal 1: Provide a Cost- $17 million Goal 3: and Protect the Goal S: $30 Alternatives Support Recommendat Improve Effective. Results Protect the Quality of Life in Mobility Efficient Travel Enviroment the Study Area and Economic Option Re ion Development Enhanced Bus Carry forward as Baseline alternative (Required) Carry forward as Baseline alternative (Required) Carry forward as Baseline Baseline Alternative BRT 1 - Eden Prairie to Minneapolis, • • Does not meet Tier 1 Goals. HCRRA Do not carry forward BRT 2' - Eden Prairie to Minneapolis. 0 0 Does not meet Tier 1 Goals. Do forward Golden Triangle /Opus/TH 169 / HCRRA not carry LRT to - Eden Prairie to Minneapolis, 0 0 Meets Tier 1 Goals, Carry Forward Tier 2 3 Carry forward for HCRRA/Kenilworth /Royalston to further analysis LRT 2A' - Eden Prairie to Minneapolis. Other alternatives 1- 494 / HCRRA / 0 (3 Meets Tier 1 Goals, Carry Forward Tier 2 0 0 better meet Tier 2 Kenilworth /Royalston to Goals. Do not carry forward LRT 3A' - Eden Prairie to Minneapolis. Golden Triangle /Opus/ 0 0 Meets Tier 1 Goals; Carry 0 O Carry forward for HCRRA/Kenilworth/ Forward to Tier 2 further analysis Ro alston LRT 4A - Hopkins to Minneapolis HCRRA/Kenilworth /Royalston 0 Part of full alternative Do not forward carry LRT 1C - Eden Praine to Minneapolis, HCRRA/Midtown /Nicollet 0 • Does not meet Tier 1 Goals. forward Do not carry LRT 2C - Eden Prairie to Minneapolis. I 0 0 Does not meet Tier 1 Goals; forward 494 / HCRRA /Midtown /Nicollet Do not carry LRT 3C - Eden Prairie to Minneapolis, Triangle /Opus/ pus/ Golden T 0 0 Meets Tier 1 Goals; Carry Fo Tier 2 0 0 0 Carry forward for HCRRA/Midtown/ Nicollet ward [o further analysis LRT 4Ct - Hopkins to Minneapolis, . • Part of full alternative Do not forward HCRRA/Midtown /Nicollet carry Evaluation Breakpoints Does not support goal 0 Supports goal O Strongly supports goal 121 Supports goal on fewer than 4 of 6 measures Supports goal on fewer than 7 of 10 m easures Supports goal on fewer than 3 of 4measures Supports goal on 4 Supports goal on 7 of 10 Supports goal on of 6 measures measures 3 of 4 measures Supports goal on all measure. Supports goal on all measures Supports goal on all measures dFhe Results: Light Rail Routes After comparing the benefits, costs and impacts of eight light rail transit (LRT) and two bus rapid transit (BRT) alterna- tives, three of the eight LRT alternatives were recommended for further study. The remaining five LRT alternatives and the two BRT alternatives were not recommended because they did not meet study goals. Three LRT alternatives (LRT IA, LRT 3A, and LRT 3C) were recommended for retention because they are superior at addressing the Southwest Transitway goals of improving Advancing to Next Study Phase mobility, providing a cost - effective and efficient travel op- tion, protecting the environment, preserving the quality of life, and supporting economic development. The three LRT alternatives are expected to carry more riders, attract more new riders to the transit system, be more cost - effective, more operationally efficient, provide transit service to those most in need, provide connections to workplaces, medical facilities, shopping centers and other activities centers in the southwest metro area, and create opportunities for further economic development in southwest metro area communities. Intermodal Station Royalston 4th Street VanWhite / 8th Street`✓ 12th Street Penn " 21 st Street Q Franklin Lyndale West Lake �{•�........:. �.....•... • • /`� • Uptown 28th Street Louisiana ��•BelHine Wooddale I%•' �`».• Southwest Transitway may'• Alternatives Analysis Hopkins ,I %• Blake Shady Oak Rowland J 1`. # Opus City West • ] ❑ Preliminary Study Recommendation - Southwest Technical Advisory Committee Highway 62 s.w.m 27. 2o01i Golden Triangle LRT 1A Route % (T� — — — LRT 3A Route �,•/ • LRT 3C Route • �• Station +.• ll'y O Park & Ride Station Highway 5 V V C a Mitchell J • • Southwest Station Eden Prairie Town Center Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority ALTERNATIVES 2030 Ridership LRT 1A 23,500 LRT 3A 27,000 LRT 3C 28,100 2030 New Riders 4,500 7,500 6,800 2015 Capital Cost $865 million $1.2 billion $1.4 billion 2015 Operating Cost $12 million $16 million $17 million Cost - Effectiveness Index (il $30 $26 $30 Intermodal Station Royalston 4th Street VanWhite / 8th Street`✓ 12th Street Penn " 21 st Street Q Franklin Lyndale West Lake �{•�........:. �.....•... • • /`� • Uptown 28th Street Louisiana ��•BelHine Wooddale I%•' �`».• Southwest Transitway may'• Alternatives Analysis Hopkins ,I %• Blake Shady Oak Rowland J 1`. # Opus City West • ] ❑ Preliminary Study Recommendation - Southwest Technical Advisory Committee Highway 62 s.w.m 27. 2o01i Golden Triangle LRT 1A Route % (T� — — — LRT 3A Route �,•/ • LRT 3C Route • �• Station +.• ll'y O Park & Ride Station Highway 5 V V C a Mitchell J • • Southwest Station Eden Prairie Town Center Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority Mr. And Mrs. Marlowe W. Iverson 7220 York Avenue South, #404 Edina, MN 55435 =4463 Telephone: (952) 927 -6108 Email: ivy @mainsol.net Marlowe W. Iverson 7220 York Avenue South, #404 Edina, MN 55435 -4463 Telephone: (952) 927 -6108 Email: ivv @mainsol.net 11. May 2007 Edina City Council cc: Craig Larson, Planning Edina CityRall Edina City. Hall 4801 West 50'b Street, 4801 West 50ui Street, Edina, MN 55424 Edina, MN 55424 Reference 7311 France Avenue South Gentlemen and Madams, As a resident of York Condo West, I writing to you about the revised Cypress Equities proposal to replace the. closed Centennial Lakes Theater. Our understanding is that the highlights of their proposal includes the following features: • Two -story lake -front restaurants, • Home furnishings, store. Storage and accessories store, • Multiple boutique, retail stores, • 5 4evel parking garage. Their current proposal is a great improvement over their previously proposed 17 story high -- rise structure.. It doesn't bother us that it has no. condos or mixed development. Thank You! Sincerely, `aPGITY CAF p SEAL 9 MAY 14 7001 RE IVED;