Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2007-09-04_COUNCIL MEETING
l EDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING PROCEDURES During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public comment after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to speak on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your comments are relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: • Individuals must limit their presentations to three minutes. The Mayor will modify presentation times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit comments to the matter under consideration. • In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. During "Public Comments," the Mayor will ask to hear from those in attendance who would like to speak about something not on the agenda. Individuals must limit their presentations to three minutes and cannot speak to an issue for which a public hearing was previously held and closed or a matter scheduled for a future hearing. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments. Instead, the Council might direct the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 4, 2007 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of September 4, 2007 * II. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre List dated August 23, 2007, TOTAL $990.00. III. ADTOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of August 21, 2007, Work Session of August 21, 2007 and Study Session of August 28, 2007 Agenda/ Edina City Council September 4, 2007 Page 2 II. PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS - Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If Council wishes to proceed, action by resolution. 3/5 favorable rollcall vote of all members of the Council required to pass if improvement is petitioned for; 4/5 favorable rollcall if no petitions. Rollcall A. IMPROVEMENT HEARING - Improvement No. S -092 - Doncaster Way Sidewalk Improvement Rollcall B. IMPROVEMENT HEARING - Improvement No. S -100 = Halifax Avenue Sidewalk Improvement III. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON VACATIONS OF STREET OR UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENTS Affidavits of Notice by Clerk. Presentation by Engineer. Public comment heard. Motion to close hearing. If Council wishes to proceed, action by Resolution 3/5 favorable rollcall of Council Members required to pass. Rollcall A. VACATION OF EXISTING PUBLIC RIGHT -OF -WAY EASEMENT - West 41St Between Lynn and Monterey Avenue IV. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Zoning Ordinances: First Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three Council members except that a rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Second Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three of Council to pass except rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall votes of four members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required passing. Conditional Use Permit: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required to pass. Variance Appeal: Favorable rollcall of Council Members present to uphold or deny appeal * A. SET HEARING DATE (09/18107) - Preliminary Rezoning, Final Development Plan and Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan, Joe Costa, 6444/6446 Xerxes Avenue South V. PUBLIC COMMENT VI. AWARD OF BID A. Contract No. ENG 07 -11 - Landscaping West 70th Street - France to York Avenue - Continued from August 21, 2007 " B. 50th and France Emergency Concrete Paver Repair * C. Braemar West Arena Emergency Repair Evaporative Condenser I 0 r i Agenda/ Edina City Council September 4, 2007 Page 3 VII. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS A. Resolution No. 2007 -92 Accepting Various Donations VIII. FINANCE A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated August 23, 2007, TOTAL $1,467,904.33; and August 30, 2007 TOTAL $812,838.80. B. RESOLUTION NO. 2007-91 - Setting Maximum Tax Levies for 2008 C. SET HEARING DATES FOR TRUTH IN TAXATION IX. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS X. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS XI. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952-927-886172 hours in advance of the meeting. Tues Sept 18 Tues Sept 18 Mon Sept 24 Tues Sept 25 Tues Oct 2 Tues Oct 2 Tues Oct 16 Tues Oct 16 Tues Oct 23 Mon Nov 5 ies Nov 6 rues Nov 20 Thurs Nov 22 Fri Nov 23 Tues Nov 27 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS joint Work Session with Planning Commission 5:00 P.M., COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Joint Meeting with Edina School Board 5:30 P.M. RM 350A EDINA COM CTR Study Session - Boards /Comm. Apt Process 11:30 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Joint Work Session with Park Board 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS joint Work Session with Env. & Eng Comm. 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Study Session - To be determined 11:30 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M., COUNCIL CHAMBERS SCHOOL DISTRICT ELECTION DAY - POLLS OPEN 7 A.M. - 8 P.M. Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Study Session - To be determined 11:30 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AUGUST 21, 2007 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Chair Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Masica and seconded by Commissioner Swenson approving the Consent Agenda for the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AUGUST 7, 2007, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Bennett and seconded by Commissioner Housh approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority from August 7, 2007. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned. Executive Director R55CKREG 0000 Check # Date Amount 13965 8123/2007 540.00 225.00 225.00 990.00 990.00 Supplier / Explanation PO # 100049 EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC CALCULATIONS TIF REPORTS TIF REPORTS Grand Total CITY OF 1 Council Check magister 8/23/2007 —8/23/2007 Doc No Inv No Account No 168231 335363 9134.6103 168232 335364 9132.6103 168232 335364 9134.6103 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 990.00 Total Payments 990.00 8/22 8:19:27 Page- 1 Business Unit GRANDVIEW TAX DISTRICT CENTENNIAL LAKE TAX DISTRICT GRANDVIEW TAX DISTRICT R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/22/2007 8:19:29 Councll Check Summery 8/23/2007 - 8/23/2007 Company Amount 09000 HRA FUND 990.00 Report Totals 990.00 We Conflnn to the best ofew baMe iae and belief, that these claims Comply In all material respects With the requirements of the City of Edna ptuohnsing pries and Page - MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 21, 2007 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RAVEN SCULPTER,BRIAN YOUNG RECOGNIZED Dick Crockett, Executive Director, Edina Community Foundation and Edina Public Art Committee member explained the sculpture The Raven had been displayed outside at Grandview Square Park for about a year. He said the Public Art Committee was fortunate to be able to secure the sculpture for permanent display at Edina City Hall. Mr. Crockett said the beautiful sculpture was enhanced by the wonderful display stand crafted by Edina Public Works employee James Peluf. Mr. Crockett introduced Brian Young who briefly described his sculpture stating he got the inspiration for the sculpture while in the Minnesota Boundary Waters. Mr. Young said the sculpture was carved by hand from a 500 pound block of black marble. The Mayor and Council thanked Mr. Crocket and Mr. Young for the public art contribution to the City of Edina. CONSTITUTION WEEK PROCLAIMED - SEPTEMBER 17 -23, 2007 Mayor Hovland proclaimed September 17- 3, 2007, as Constitution Week in the City of Edina and urged citizens to study the Constitution and reflect on the privilege of being an American. Member Bennett made a motion proclaiming September 17 -23, 2007, as Constitution Week in the City of Edina. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Mayor Hovland presented the proclamation to former City Clerk Florence Norback. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 21, 2007AND WORK SESSION OF AUGUST 7, 2007 APPROVED Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh approving as presented the minutes of the Regular Meeting of August 7, 2007, and the work session of August 7, 2007. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. PUBLIC COMMENT Joe Witt, 5604 Dalrymple Road, expressed the concerns over his neighborhood being overrun with parked cars from persons attending sporting events and classes at the Edina Community Center and Southview Middle School. He said it was not a problem during the summer, but as soon as school starts the neighborhood will be inundated with parked cars. Page 1 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 21, 2007 Deb Witt, 5604 Dalrymple Road, echoed the problems experienced by the neighbors. David Nelson, 5603 Dalrymple Road, echoed the problems experienced by the neighbors. William Tenney, 5608 Dalrymple Road, added the street needed cross walks to make it safer. Galen Honn, 5611 Dalrymple Road, stated that during his thirty years of residency traffic has become dangerous. He suggested one side of the road be allowed as residence only parking and that the School District never installed the landscaping buffer as promised at the end of the street. The Council discussed the concerns among themselves and with staff. They assured the neighbors the City would find the appropriate School District personnel to bring the situation to their attention, would discuss the issue at their joint meeting, and would include the neighbors when notifying of the next Community Center Neighborhood meeting and that Edina Traffic Safety Committee would review the issue. *BID AWARDED FOR CONTRACT NO. ENG 07-4 2007 MILL AND OVERLAY PROTECT Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh awarding the bid for Contract No. ENG. 07-4 2007 Mill and Overlay Project to the recommended low bidder, Valley Paving Inc. at $438,136.85. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR CONTRACT NO. ENG 07 -11 LANDSCAPING WEST 70th STREET CONTINUED Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh awarding the bid for Contract No. ENG. 07 -11 Landscaping West 70th Street- France to York Ave., continued to September 4, 2007. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR CONTRACT NO. ENG 07 -9 ARDEN AVENUE. COUNTRYSIDE ROAD SANITARY SEWER CURED -IN -PLACE PIPE REHABILITATION Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh awarding the bid for contract NO. ENG. 07- 9 Arden Ave. Countryside Road Sanitary Sewer Cured -in -Place Pipe Rehabilitation to recommended low bidder, Lametti & Sons, Inc. at $69,184.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *BID AWARDED FOR CONTRACT NO. ENG 07 -10 WEST 70th STREET STORM SEWERS AND WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh awarding the bid for contract NO. ENG. 07 -10 West 70th Street Storm Sewers and Watermain to recommended low bidder, EBI Drilling, Inc. at $241,810.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -89, ADOPTED ENDORSING GEOFF NASH, CANDIDATE FOR NINE MILE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT BOARD OF MANAGERS Mr. Hughes said Geoff Nash was completing his first term on the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Board of Managers. He said he believed Mr. Nash had made a positive contribution to the Board. Lincoln Schea, 4815 Lakeview Drive, endorsed Geoff Nash's reappointment. Page 2 v Minutes/Edina City Council/August 21, 2007 Following a brief discussion, Member Bennett made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2007 -89 endorsing Geoff Nash, Candidate for the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Board of Manager. Member Housh seconded the motion Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -88 - ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained in order to comply with State Statutes, all donations to the City must be adopted by resolution and approved by a majority of favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Swenson introduced Resolution No. 2007 -88, accepting various donations, and moved approval. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2007-86 DEMOLITION OF THE HOUSE AT 5130 FRANCE AVE. SOUTH, CONTINUED FROM AUGUST 7, 2007 Building Official Kirchman noted action on the demolition orders had been continued from the August 7, 2007, Council meeting because of a change in ownership of the subject property. He said that staff had attempted to contact the new owner by calling US Bank High Risk Property Unit but had not been able to make contact Mr. Kirchman suggested the Council adopt the proposed resolution approving the Order for Repair and Removal of Hazardous Buildings and Cleanup of Hazardous Property located at 5130 France Avenue South. Following a brief discussion, Member Swenson made a motion introducing Resolution No. 2007 -86 authorizing staff to proceed with the demolition orders for the property located at 5130 France Avenue South. Member Masica seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *PARK DEVELOPER'S FUND PROTECTS Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh authorizing the use of Park Developer's Fund in an amount not to exceed $54,000 to fund the following park improvement projects: 1. $12,993 for a new replacement wireless electronic scoreboard at Braemar Park's multi- purpose athletic field. 2. Approximately $11,400 for three new replacement wireless electronic scoreboards at Van Valkenburg Park softball complex. 3. $8,672 for purchase and installation of an information welcome kiosk for Rosland Park picnic shelter and approximately another $3,000 for design and development of permanent park maps to be placed in the information welcome kiosk. 4. $6,548 for new sideline fencing for field #1 at Pamela Park softball complex. 5. $3,000 for replacement of the Edina Art Center's proposed electronic LED sign at 661h and Valley View Road. 6. Approximately $4,000 for purchase of a water tank and trailer. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -90 ADOPTED SETTING SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS HEARING DATE (9/18107): M -07 50th AND FRANCE; G -07 GRANDVIEW SQUARE; CRESTON HILLS NEIGHBORHOOD - ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT NO. BA -332; BEARD AVE. /ABBOTT Page 3 Minutes/Edina City Council/August 21, 2007 AVE. ALLEY IMPROVEMENT NO. A -210 Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh to adopt Resolution No. 2007 -90 setting the hearing date for September 18, 2007, for the following special assessments: M-07 50th And France; G-07 Grandview Square; Creston Hills Neighborhood - Roadway Improvement No. BA- 332, Beard Ave. /Abbott Ave. Alley Improvement No. A -210 Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *APPROVE TRAFFIC SAFETY REPORT OF AUGUST 1, 2007 Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh approving the Traffic Safety Staff Review for August 1, 2007. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Swenson approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the check register dated August 9, 2007, and consisting of 34 pages: General Fund $194,610.62, CDBG Fund $8,027.17, Communications Fund $8,774.55, Working Capital Fund $24,212.35; Art Center Fund $3,107.80, Golf Dome Fund $600.54; Aquatic Center Fund $16,958.34; Golf Course Fund $27,128.98, Ice Arena Fund $28,089.99, Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $3,871.60, Liquor Fund $219,886.57, Utility Fund $55,768.89; Storm Sewer Fund $8,781.53, PSTF Fund $3,048.60; Total $602,867.53; and for approval of payment of claims dated August 16, 2007, and consisting of 34 pages: General Fund $456,742.00; Communications Fund $9,295.95; Working Capital Fund $684,995.64, Construction Fund $825.00; Art Center Fund $10,431.14; Golf Dome Fund $39.07; Aquatic Center Fund $2,656.46; Golf Course Fund $31,760.24; Ice Arena Fund $26,614.59; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $16,689.37, Liquor Fund $175,174.44, Utility Fund $469,838.65; Storm Sewer Fund $147,346.99; Recycling Fund $33,958.00; PSTF Agency Fund $2,553.20, Total $2,068,920.74 for July 2007 Credit Card Transactions consisting of one page: Total $2,846.16. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. *PETITION RECEIVED REQUESTING SOUND WALL FROM HIGHWAY 169 BETWEEN LONDONDERRY ROAD and LINCOLN DRIVE Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Housh accepting the petition signed by nineteen property owners requesting the installation of a sound wall between Londonderry and Lincoln to provide sound attenuation from Highway 169. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. There being no further business on the Council agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 8:00 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Page 4 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk a MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 21, 2007 5:00 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:00 P.M. in the Community Room of Edina City Hall. Answering rollcall were: Members Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff present included: Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager; Ceil Smith, Assistant to City Manager; Cary Teague, Planning Director; Wayne Houle, City Engineer; Mike Sitarii, Police Chief; Jeff Long, Police Lieutenant; Marty Scheerer, Fire Chief; Steve Kirchman, Building Official; John Keprios, Park Director; Vince Cockriel, Park Superintendent; Steve Johnson, Public Works Coordinator; John Wallin, Finance Director; Eric Roggeman, Assistant Finance Director; Jennifer Bennerotte, Marketing & Communications Director; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Mayor Hovland said the purpose of the special work session was to review the 2008 Operating Budget. Manager Hughes noted the Council held a pubic hearing on the 2008 budget at their August 7, 2007, meeting. He said the next steps would be to adopt the maximum levy at the September 4, 2007, meeting, to hold the Truth in Taxation Hearing in December and to adopt the final levy in December. Mr. Hughes said that he believed the following issues needed Council direction: 1) Historical Society's request for assistance in funding; 2) Public Art Committee's Request for assistance; 3) Human Rights and Relations Commission RPC issues; 4) Dial -A -Ride Program adjustment made reflecting the reduction in funding from the Metropolitan Council; and 5) Reserve Balance. The Council conducted a review of the 2008 Draft Operating Budget asking staff for clarifications in some areas. They discussed the issues outlined by Mr. Hughes. Following their discussion, their consensus was to add $10,000 to the annual budget on an ongoing basis for the Edina Historical Society, to leave the RPC monies of the Human Service budget in place, to direct staff to continue discussions attempting a re- instatement of Metropolitan Council funding, and to plan future discussion to determine the best course for the Public Arts Committee's request and regarding the reserve balance. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra Mangen, City Clerk AMENDED MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 28, 2007 5:00 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 11:30 a.m. in the Conference Room of Edina Public Works Building. Answering rollcall were: Members Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff present included: Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager; Cary Teague, Planning Director; Wayne Houle, City Engineer; John Keprios, Park Director; Vince Cockriel, Park Superintendent; John Wallin, Finance Director; Jennifer Bennerotte, Marketing & Communications Director; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Also present was Jeff Oertel, Oertel Architects, consultant. Mayor Hovland said the purpose of the study session was to review the possibility of the City's Public Works Department moving into the Con Agra building from their location on Eden Avenue. Manager Hughes said it has been a long- standing desire to.find a location to house the Edina Public Works facility that better suits the needs of the staff and be able to adequately house the large fleet of vehicles needed to perform the maintenance for the City of Edina. He noted that several issues exist with the current facility including air quality, inadequate space, parking and accessibility. Mr. Hughes explained finding a new site within a fully - developed City has been a very difficult task. Ideally, the operations performed at Public Works should be located on a site of ten to twelve acres. He noted that approximately five sites were reviewed and considered before the one presently under consideration, the Con Agra site, was considered. Mr. Hughes, with the aid of Engineer Houle and Architect Ortel, reviewed the opportunity available to the City. Opus has obtained an option on the Con Agra site that would eventually house Public Works. If the City were to proceed, Opus would acquire the existing Public Works site and redevelop the site. The City would acquire the Con Agra site and refurbish it to house the Edina Public Works staff and rolling stock. Pros and cons of the location were reviewed along with proposed methods of funding the estimated ten million net cost of pursuing the venture. The Council discussed with staff the advisability of issuing an RFP for the existing Public Works site. Staff was directed to continue the pursuit of the Con Agra site and to develop an RFP for the existing Public Works site. The Council and staff toured the existing Public Works site. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 1:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra Mangen, City Clerk ri REPORT /RECOMMENDATION TO: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # II. A. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE Consent ❑ City Engineer Information Only ❑ Date: September 4, 2007 Mgr. Recommends [:]'To HRA ® To Council Subject: Public Hearing for Action ® Motion Doncaster Way Sidewalk ® Resolution Improvements S -092 ❑ Ordinance, ❑ Discussion Recommendation: If the Council determines the project to be warranted and necessary,. Council shall adopt a resolution accepting the feasibility study and approving Doncaster Way Sidewalk Improvements, City Improvement No. S -92. Info /Background: City staff received a petition on January 21, 2003, for construction of sidewalk on Doncaster Way from Vernon Avenue to Ayrshire Boulevard. The current petition contains 57% of the affected properties; this will require a 3/5 favorable vote by the City Council to move the project forward. The proposed sidewalk would consist of a 5 -foot wide boulevard style concrete walk from the intersection of Tracy Avenue and Vernon Avenue east to Doncaster Way, then along the easterly side of Doncaster Way to the entrance of Highlands Elementary School, then along the westerly side of Doncaster Way from the Highlands Elementary School entrance to Ayrshire Avenue. The . Feasibility Study is included with this report, along with all correspondence received to date. The estimated sidewalk project cost is $93,770. Funding for this project will be from Municipal State Aid funds ($12,500), the remaining portion will be from 75% special assessments ($40,636), 25% School District #273 ($20,317), and 25% City revolving fund ($20,317). Staff analyzed the project and feels that the project is feasible and needed from an engineering standpoint. GAEngineering \Improvements \S092 Doncaster WayWDMIN \Misc \RR_ public hearing S92.doc 4,9tjA�l o� e FEASIBILITY STUDY - S092 En o ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT . �,. CITY OF EDINA SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS DONCASTER WAY AUGUST 30, 2007 LOCATION: Doncaster Way from Vernon Avenue to Ayrshire Boulevard. (See Figure 1) •�� m .v .nena,. s m ,�o.� � �� E m�, Project Limits ■ „ ... s ... .. .. e m . ., m, .e .._., � � �°. _ ,.. �■ue• .,,, A. N e m Doncaster Way Sidewalk Area w +E '•' Engineering Dept September, 2007 Figure 1. Project Area Map Feasibility Study Doncaster Way Sidewalk Improvements S -092 August 30, 2007 INITIATION & ISSUES: This project was initiated by a petition accepted by the City of Edina on January 21, 2003. The petition was signed by eight residents who lived in the neighborhood. Currently there are only six residents that still reside there. An updated petition was received by the City of Edina on August 29, 2007. The petition requesting sidewalk was signed by 130 of 227 households. The 130 houses represent 57% of the 227 total households within the proposed assessment area. (see figure 2) The following are existing features and resident comments that present issues in determining the feasibility of the project and are addressed in this report: • Daily vehicle traffic varies from 213 to 1746 cars per day. (see figure 3) • Safety of residents and school children • Located within the School District defined walking area of Highlands Elementary School. EXISTING CONDITIONS: The existing roadway is a bituminous surface that varies from 26 feet to 31 feet wide. The street does not currently have curb and gutter or sidewalk. The other streets in the neighborhood are similar to Doncaster Way in their characteristics. (See Photos 1 and 2). tv ., 1... a Photo 1. Doncaster Way - Lookinq North of Merritt Circle -1",: Page 2 of 12 T Feasibility Study Doncaster Way Sidewalk Improvements S -092 August 30, 2007 Photo 2. Doncaster Way — Looking South from Ayrshire Blvd At the north end of Doncaster Way is Highlands Park. Highlands Park is currently used for a variety of sporting events such as soccer and baseball. The park has a small trail that extends along the north side of Ayrshire Boulevard from Glengarry Parkway to Doncaster Way. Currently there are painted pedestrian cross walks at the entrance to Highlands School and on the west side of Doncaster at Ayrshire Boulevard. During the winter months pedestrians are forced to walk along the edge of the roadway in order to get to and from school. This section of roadway receives any where from 213 to 1746 vehicle trips a day, see figure 3. Engineering staff recommends separating pedestrians and vehicles whenever traffic exceeds 750 vehicles per day. Sharing the road becomes very difficult during the winter months, see photo 3. A solution suggested during the public process suggested designating a portion of the roadway for pedestrians. However this would not give the pedestrians enough room during the winter months. (See Photos 3 and 4) Page 3 of 12 Feasibility Study Doncaster Way Sidewalk Improvements S -092 August 30, 2007 1 X099 0 W.37 60, 5001 733 5]25 6py 56011 5020 3005 19 17 Legend = 51w ew 5aeo 366, w15 Petition Signatures 8-2007 5105 5105 Signed Petition j st 11 5160 / 5116 - 5113 ■ • No Signature ! • — – 311E 6124 iL' 6,zo 5+,7 Project Limits I 61 E� 5124 5 _ J .............................. N...-.-.....I 51:5 5125 �� 3127 6123 ♦♦ 5621 5610 Y16 5612 5606 5601 St31 5120 5700 //�� W49 5251 ♦ 5)06 (l 5245 5117 S /,0 .:. 5237 W4, 6000 ♦, - W1, 55,9 1 �6 5205 : 82« 5252 . ♦_ ' , 5609 55ni 530, 520, , 62« S2iD 5250 •♦ 52,2 ■O 5205 IM 5205 52M ro, 13 ■ 3296 5260 E233 52W ■ 5 WM � 11OerM 20■ 5205 i.: Si« W ax ... .. 5220 6 426 5M 5336 _- _ -_u+9 - - _ 4 5101 5]00 .__� ■�f 5300 ?? 56d "0, SJ■/ ■ 5225 5221 5272 W73 5305 6701 5276 Sul 5200 stn 5J39 410■ 5260 1 560■ 550, - 573 stet ■ 1717 Ssu ■ ■ 5316 ;52,7 5701 $717 6016 W12 5005 eoao 5960 j 5100 •ao .■ 510, 5100 '�. 5605 5213 5]05 5100 510_ SIN 1 5200 5205 5201 5300 ••Y 5+05 SAW 5105 Sete .'wU 5000 5601 >rOs a6n 5701 ''�' .. .. s7oa 5019 5509 5169 eom 6001 bla .. .. -- ereorr rw -. 5]06 uae 5117 5521 6129 ■ 55ui S'.nli 5501 5505 5,09 j�, Vt] ■ 5SU0 05501 5713 5308 06 6 ■ 5506 5501 5'A6 !yQ/ 6505 SSW 6506 j 5/25 5J12 SI]I t 6505 5501 511; u 6500 5500 5608 9512 TAW 5512 512, 5316 6012 6000 5125 551? 5513 5612 5617 5. t1, i 5512 55i7 5516 5501 5501 '. 5505 551' !,:t /617 - 5505 It l: 6000 0005 5001 Mn 5500 Sste 551C 5521 5510 1517 5520 5501' , • 5'1 1 525 i 5510 ,y, 5531 5509 Son ....... 5 5510 551 -.) /5 SSW 0000 5004 5000 ; 6501 5500 X17 5525 55.9 -/621 SSri SSxO 551] 551: � � 551+ • 3519 S5a _ • 5512 3316 ram S 5517 '* 552■ 5520 SSS] S51B 551, ` 5511 • 3 3517 6W8 6005 1510 3507 5601 � � 96U 5`1B 5539 3577 5516 . .... ,1632 3. 5672 8 5321 1WP 0001 9511 351, 5506 5521 553• 5572 55]] 55]4 5�.5 X20+ 1 5532 Y01 iii 55 6000 .0 5636 5«1 SSIe SStb 'u526 5605 _. •. _ _ _ .... _ _ • 5600 �' �u W • 5 0001 5515 5512 . W+ 66W 6Qg1 £ Se08 u +� SB07 SVVV/ 5601 5600 5600 5601 56W q- 3000 S 5009 5721 n SBOS 5801 5601 SBA `' SaaS 5529 5500 B 561 1 6016 6012 S60t Y 5613 5912 ,509 5000 5606 5608 Se06 5808 5612 3501 S 5006 %12 i �W1p1M 5519 ]1 5612 W15 5512 5516 , 5500 550i 5515 550, 6006 e i 361] 2 5017 5616 5617 5616 5]29 �.y� 3500 ♦ 3 J 5308 Figure 2. Petition Results 2007 ` 1 Page 4 of 12 N W E w ^�; Doncaster Way Sidewalk Area 1 �� $ Petition Signatures (2007) s Engineering Dept ..� September, 2007 Figure 2. Petition Results 2007 ` 1 Page 4 of 12 r,. Feasibility Study Doncaster Way Sidewalk Improvements S -092 August 30, 2007 5312 �/ �c l 5317 5400 5605 5401 5215 HIGHLANDS PARK °o°° 5209 520 5405 5404 5405 u HIGHLANDS 5409 5408 � 55701 n ELEMENTRY ADT 213 000000=00 o0000a 0 5409 AYRSHIRE BLVD n 5705 5408 - B -2oo7 ° 501 5500 5501 5713 5709 n 3 ADT 1515 u 9 -2000 ° )5 5500 ADT 1746 550 5508 5504 5505 5504 4 -2001 ° ADT 1504 5508 5509 5512 a Q 542 B -2002 3 5512 5516 5501 ° w ADT 973 5513 Co 5501 9 2003 U 5505 0 5516 5517 5520 5504 U o U ADT 703 5509 B -2007 5520 5521 5524 5508 0 5509 5509 ' 5508 3 ° Y p X 5513 u 5513 5524 5525 5528 5512 B 5513 CD U 5512 LU u 5528 5529 5532 5517 5516 0 5517 5517 5516 u 0 5521 5532 5533 5536 5525 ° 5520 0 5521 5532 o°oo°000c °oc°°o °0000 °�� 56001 VERNON AVE �/II Figure 3. Average Daily Traffic History ` N W +E S September 2007 Page 5 of 12 LEGEND o°000° Proposed Sidewalk Layout ae4' 11 6 X1,9 coo=. Existing Sidewalk Average Daily ADT Traffic Figure 3. Average Daily Traffic History ` N W +E S September 2007 Page 5 of 12 Feasibility Study Doncaster Way Sidewalk Improvements S-092 August 30, 2007 Ail SCHOOL BUS VTIMMO,_,"�" - N Photo 3. Existing Pedestrian Movements Photo 4. Existing Roadway Page 6 of 12 3 Feasibility Study Doncaster Way Sidewalk Improvements S -092 August 30, 2007 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: The Doncaster Way Sidewalk Improvements consist of a 5 foot wide boulevard style concrete walk (see photo 5) from the intersection of Tracy Avenue and Vernon Avenue east to Doncaster Way. Concrete curb and gutter is not proposed to be installed along either side of Doncaster Way. The sidewalk is proposed to be located on the east side of the roadway from Vernon Avenue to the Highlands School Entrance then the west side north to Ayrshire Boulevard. (See Figure 4) 53 i V HIGHLANDS PARK +5 0 5215 Z. * .: ' 5209' 52b �49 x5408 0 ,- { AYRSHIRE B� 5OTB 7fl ' 6 ^� .tf55A1 • 57 i r C00 50 X504`. J .. • i 55 5 8` f.. .f F'r �►� ;46 16, 31,. 75 -,45501 . +.`HIGHLANDS ' O ELEMENTRY ;. �5 20 i 4 5520►. 5 X524 55�g' 46' q' 5513' 11 1 �55 1x2 W 5 7. i, 5 32� - - 51 z r D 0 ASTER WAY N .03... Proposed Sidewalk Layout W +E a •••.•• Existing Sidewalk S August 2007 Figure 4. Proposed Sidewalk Location Page 7 of 12 Feasibility Study Doncaster Way Sidewalk Improvements S -092 August 30. 2007 Photo 5. Boulevard Style Sidewalk i. -7t 4 ighla ds 0 School Highlands School Route Plan Map j send - GrovweMe 'Jp Gro g G.,N NN 0 EYnwiVVY SUad Zane Eestrp SbrelA O�ctln • Spw N�'^E 3�e 11 � q. � - P.Oemun Rout. 1 Slap Spn 5 ^z� 7 Ygtl ssma.. -n s: Figure 5. School District Adopted Walkway Area Page 8 of 12 Feasibility Study Doncaster Way Sidewalk Improvements S -092 August 30, 2007 CRASH DATA: There have been a total of six accidents that have occurred between 2001- 2006. • One at intersection of Merrit Circle and Vernon Avenue Tuesday, September 12, 2006 ® Two just south of Doncaster Way and Merrit Circle. Monday, September 16, 2006 Tuesday, September 17, 2006 9 One on Mirror Lakes Drive, 600 feet south of Ayrshire Boulevard Friday, January 23, 2004 • One at intersection of Mirror Lakes Drive and Dundee Road Tuesday, December 9, 2003 • One at intersection of Mirror Lakes Drive and Ayrshire Boulevard. Friday, December 12, 2003 HIGHLANDS ELEMENTRY ENROLLMENT: Currently there are 553 kids that are enrolled full -time; 82 of these students are open enrollments. MAINTENANCE OF SIDEWALK: Based on past City Council policy the Edina Public Works Department will maintain a school zone sidewalk which includes snow removal. RIGHT -OF -WAY & EASEMENTS: The right -of -way along Doncaster Way is typically 60 feet wide. All proposed improvements stay within this right -of -way -and no additional easement requirements are anticipated. PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $93,770 (see Table 1). The total cost includes indirect costs of 15% for engineering and clerical costs and 7.5% for first year finance costs. Funding for the entire project will be from a combination of State Aid funds (sidewalk along Vernon Avenue), special assessments, School District #273 and City of Edina funds. The costs splits are based on the sidewalk finance policy that was adopted by -the City council in 1998, see attached policy. The cost participation breakdown is shown in Table 1. 1 Percentage $ Amount Sidewalk Cost Participation: State Aid $12,500 School District #273 25% $20,317 City of Edina 25% $20,317 Assessed to Residents 50% $40,636 Total Project: $93,770 Table 1. Estimated Project Costs Page 9 of 12 Feasibility Study Doncaster Way Sidewalk Improvements S -092 August 30, 2007 ASSESSMENTS: A special assessment of approximately $180 per residential equivalent unit will be levied against residents located within the walking zone of Highlands Elementary School. (see Figure 6). A future assessment could be assessed to properties east of Doncaster Way for a future sidewalk along Ayrshire Boulevard, see figure 7. This special assessment maybe spread over three years if desired by the property owner. The final assessment will be set once the project is bid and prior to construction. L seo aeon .., ■660 '� 5w, ISSw15505 �'3] Stm _ 5615 , !Ma ffiffi �� ■ a w+ ess s+6 ti ees �0 I �' s+a Preliminary Assessment Role Doncaster Way Sidewalk ' S m■ ''a Assessments I % eoeo �+ fOt■ - $180 Residential \� 6 $20,317 School District #273 $20,317 City of Edina Project Limits 1,ze su I ez6■ .fr ♦+' Sz <e �� -� HIGHLANDS u1� o sss 'y PARK„ eei v,e . �.. t E ers azffi sz1■ � - � Y 9 5 aaa � sue s:n ��srra ez . 5 UN e e6,zle■■■ / 6000 ■ wn sw� s3oo e...y -� ■ ..: X01 Y�" e11e em, � s.s 0 :' j. 5/3�■{3e � : 6501 :'SOe� ■ s5a■ HIGHLANDS ■ ■ JJJJ����� '- e p j1 [ ELEMENTRY suo ddd ■ e� ees _ � � ■ ■ esee s1, ffiw _ ■ e000 ■ effi, ffioo M13 ! g sm 6 s6 ae,z 3 ssro i 0 ew5 � 55,011 ,,W ffi ee17 .11 e000 55,� I1 ffi" i 55a1... SOR, i iA esn �� _ ee■, lS,ell l W5 56CD 5■ rvurvx �.uan w \ f\ ffiffi �... lee +e ffi7? —_� —.. _...` P■41 i ■1.Y'teM.■I.MY..Y.■W■1 -� \/� ■pp1 sell I am ffi01 / 5 ,r mi seeo Se6o SeO, 5800 ffiffi (C 0■q �., 000■ -- �_ _..- 6e0D . O S, ffi0■ / stz, „ s60s s601 sew _se0s aw , woe/ s, 050,5 .12 ,� � 013 e■,a ' / j _ _ r5e6e Sew ' Sew 1■0■ " ffi+2 - 5801 tS sera $tz e■n / per% ee,3 ee+z se,s se+z ffin 1". /✓ 56w _ ro■ s■os eon a saw sew i / i L--� l ,�..,c'■ ,m sen se,e w`,� _`seee� Fiqure 6. Preliminary Assessment Map Page 10 of 12 N W +E s ON-1711 Engineering Dept September, 2007 Fiqure 6. Preliminary Assessment Map Page 10 of 12 Feasibility Study Doncaster Way Sidewalk Improvements S -092 August 30, 2007 Figure 7. Existing, Proposed and Future Sidewalk Page 11 of 12 Feasibility Study Doncaster Way Sidewalk Improvements S -092 August 30, 2007 PROJECT SCHEDULE: Council Orders Public Hearing ........... .........................August 7, 2007 Open House ............... ............................... .......August 15, 2007 Receive Feasibility Report .............. ......................September 4, 2007 Public Hearing ................................................... September 4, Bid Opening ............... .................... ............ Winter 2007 pang Final Assessment Hearing ... .........................Winter 2007 /Spring 2008 Award Contract ................. .........................Winter 2007 /Spring 2008 Begin Construction ....................... ............................... Spring 20 Complete Construction ........................ ........................Summer 2008 FEASIBILITY: Due to the increasing amount of vehicle trips per day and the request from the Highlands Elementary School Site Council a sidewalk to separate vehicles and pedestrians would be recommended. ATTACHMENTS: The City Council has adopted a policy through the Edina Transportation Commission to support Pedestrian Paths. Along with this policy the Parks and Recreation Department has recently completed a Needs Assessment Survey of the city and found that Pedestrian Paths are the most requested /wanted need in the City of Edina, see attached. This project is also feasible from an engineering standpoint. 0 Petition To The City Council 0 Resident Letter #1 0 Resident Letter #2 — Informational Meeting Notice. 0 Informational Meeting Attendance List 0 Resident Letter #3 0 Resident Letter #4 with Resident Survey 0 Survey Results 0 Resident Letter #5 — Informational Meeting Announcement 0 Project Comments and Letters Received 0 Photos 0 Open House Power Point Presentation 0 Open House Attendance List and Comments 0 Information Meeting PowerPoint Presentation 0 Public Hearing Notices, Certificate of Mailing and List of Labels 0 Future Sidewalk Financing Policy 0 Transportation Policy 1999 and 2005 0 Parks and Recreation Needs Assessment 0 Traffic Data 0 429.031 Preliminary Plans, Hearings. Page 12 of 12 t11A.Atl �Y City of Edina, Minnesota o � L 9`r DATE: r p CITY COUNCIL o .3 4501 West 50th Street ® Edina, Minnesota 55424 (612) 927 -8861 0 (612) 927 - 7645 -FAX o (612) 927 - 5461 -TDD PETITION T® THE CITY COUNCIL, SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEN (PAVING ❑ WATERMAIN ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ S'TREE'T LIGHTING ❑ CURL AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET ❑ OTHER: SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. Vernon Ave Avve',-5%jtc 001l C 06 4-6y", between ard LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNEID THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITE' COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE EWFROVEMEE, 1TS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE HVIPROVEIVIENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIY. AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, I %UNNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY ONATIER'S e T,r' 70 a 'rT TTJ E OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S (PRINTED) PRONE s sow �"I���� tt ci itI2 This petition was circulated by: NAME ADDRESS rr'C lie q'sz 92.7 Ot g�,o 7Y2, ?Z7 1?817 PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SEPTEMBER 19W Lt OWNER'S SIGNATURE r PROPERTY ADDRESS ®WAITER'S PHONE SS17 6(e,( 5,3-:5 Z 6 J'S - 9 �s A. X11 City of Edina, Minnesota CITY COUNCIL rJ .sy 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 (612) 927 -8861 • (612) 927 -7645 -FAX • (612) 927 - 5461 -TD < PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL ,SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER DATE: `2rl 2.2 /0 ❑ WATERMAIN ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET ❑ OTHER: SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. ^ n Qo,VCAsTI W - between V e r J1 C " -1 and /� LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY #TREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NANIE ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS M ADDRESS and ADDRESS and ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE This petition was circulated by: OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) StAA Frx) PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S PHONE 5757I3 At4ATTTU l S�loZ� 5�6 6'517 1 A,1 ?. der 0f� - -1 S3 V1�1Q�� ^,r; if C�rcAle- 5 -IZi -g,13U NAME ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SEPTEMBER 1890 o City of Edina, Minnesota DATE: e t4 CITY COUNCIL y b ` ry -� 4801 West 50th Street o Edina, Minnesota 55424 � (612) 927 -8861 o (612) 927 - 7645 -FAX 0.(612) 927 - 5461 -TDD �' �, PETITION TO ` O THE CITY COUNCIL X1 SIDEWALK ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY El PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: ❑ WATERMAIN ❑ STRIEET LIGHTING ❑ OTHER: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. 1'j C. U��'� between Vim' (- 1)UN and &-CshIre. 3I id LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NANIE between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME and ADDRESS ADDRESS and ADDRESS ADDRESS and ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCEL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS, DETER MINED BY THE COUNCEL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S SIGNATURE (PRINTED) PHONE s��Zt, �� Lt's�C'�ihlei�► 5'20b lt,u►dee PC! R2u.q °�-`� '4141414r 1. 1�1 - k'(C�W -5 I;Ua 9dv pse7 n� �n d—' 6 ty.La� E I �r.� I-o'A I- ry\, v Y vii (-& k� s � 1z Z _ `1 z . �' �1.. i,•i i [ l� .i �, L i� t� �L- i' '1 I_� �l •,c ( 1 ! .• Ci I 1 Cam" �- r �� -. -- ��"' (l' �(Fl 11, _,<r-•`. �}:.. ) ��'`�'i.•aS' � ,. c�i1 This petition was circulated by: w e �d -2- 7 _ 6 70 NAME ADDRESS I PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SEPTEMBER 1990 PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S SIGNATURE (PRINTED) PHONE A4317-4 11A MWpJ j-.•. 5"ryou',15 iC-C,- coy�� ME: lc'cl"j V ( `WL , )-\-C" -\ 5121 Miff -yrLa� .s :3 1 Sao 5jE MirwYlok. 2-0 q9 6 evscasvi Lo - ql� kow, v- y v M Sli'l A I I! V•4 CA 73 5-1 City of Edina, Minnesota DATE: CITY COUNCIL R1 Gin �i /�� ( v 4501 West 50th Street o Edina, NUnnesota 55424 BY —_ (612) 927 -5561 o (612) 927 - 7645 -FAX o (612) 927 - 5461 -TDD PETITION TO THE E CITY COUNCIL. SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY ]PAVING ❑ WATE MAIN ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONIJY ❑ PERMANENT STREET ❑ OTHER: SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. T t n 1 �11CG�iZr 1,1 >C1 \/ between V - x1101`1 and �/ 5_ 11i {. LOCATION OF INIPROVEM NT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO RAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCEL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL, AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S _� OWNER' NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S SIGNATURE (P PHONE +/ //V 64 r GPI, 2 H S Zvi ��`�✓, ��q �;s Z- �'ZJ'= c� > >�' / /J �.L f r. �. r!Ci (CGS L %' S,�T� ?` 5-5 S 77 T— _ / This peti ion was circulated by: �� Y t� k�- -� ��1�� V I < A\ > 1(v {1"� P T r �: NAME ADDRESS r— PHONE There is space for more signatures'on the back or you may attach extra pages. SEPTEMBER 19W PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE V1 OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS (PRINTED) 0-r- -3-0 14A) 61 , r 5 ,." z I I OWNER'S PHONE clrti tiNn, �r o e � City of Edina, Minnesota j`j' 20J CITE' COUNCIL. BY 4801 West 50th Street o Edina, Minnesota 53424 ` (612) 927 -8861 a (612) 927 -7645 -FAX o (612) 927 - 5461 -TDD PETITION .TO. THE CITY COUNCIL SIDEWALK a ALLEY PAVING ❑ STORM[ SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ FERM[ANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER DATE: . WATERMAIN ❑ STREET LIGHTING, ❑ OTHER: To the Mayor and City Council The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. ^ Upoux -6lu (ti('W between ���t'V�l/1, and J V (�MVle-, 6\VJ -. LOCATION OF IMPROVEM.E14T BY STREET NAME ADDRESS j ADDRESS between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME Mr. ADDRESS and ADDRESS and ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES ]BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS U'4 AMOUNTS DETERNnNED BY THE COUNCIL. AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S S NATURE • V This petition was circulated by: OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S PHONE c , v in -s ; ( arc : c V4, eILI - 2 z� _ '�'►2t c v I a vii l PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S PHONE c , v in -s ; ( arc : c V4, eILI - 2 z� NolriGcU- ICJ Dr I z- C)-- 2—Z;27 54sbb �obt T) . 25' �,)Ll��. (1�1c� •J�, �► ��i(E�t.c� 11 J C;`;� r1CIl� r CL.r�: CIC,L X11 Zff� NAME ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on die back or you may attach extra pages. SEMEMBEi 1%0 PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME L,V)Sr- 3QEIJW 11 _ c., 07� 54— ■ -7:Yts cA c a. Ul 4 mn jok. brfiv,,\ - Neve- rL v PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S PHONE -50ff 2S 5aO�, -5ff6l Spore} Qn, �S-L-S2-1-0593 1% ti I WOW s! R roam, �—,g q S��Z,6 --6; � s lro& YOUL, LN% Cis L - CL14 -1?650 1 s3t-I fv\kcroir 01 5311 WIVM(LAte e- q --M3 9L 2 ro 1 r u i - I i Y, I5 til 1,-';J 3A -7 - 7 'Joe (5L)ykl?- -s -e 4,,j,4< ry am k City of ]Edina, Minnesota Y In CITY lL C®VJNCIL LI '• 1. 4501 West 50th Street o Edina, Minnesota 55424 (612) 927 -5561 o (612) 927 - 7645 -FAX o (612) 927 - 5461 -TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL D< SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEN' PAVING ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ SANITARY SEWED ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: DATE: �] ❑ WATEItMAIN ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ OTHER: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. between �� �Ir'rll_► i'1 and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMEN Y STREET NAME ADDRESS �— ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between between ADDRESS and and ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME - ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED 'PHIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL. MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS IDETEI NUNEID BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S (PRINTED) I PHONE 1 0 This petition was circulated by: r,� ►� D V I G� NAME ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SEPTEMBER,eeo PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME E (PRINTED) atrgR , -0 V 'o k&y- L6 6(614.1-1 "1 41- ax 11M nd C�t.. Ali u, U'O ILL .......... iev 1�3 PROPERTY ADDRESS 5,5 a- -r, � cJwv � �!,j Q� OWNER'S q �IDA-Vboq ZV 15 5,: 42 -1// 55 9J -,152 cj'2-s47 4(. ,;' 5'04 7,Y) —S 0 C ka c #,Ppj JA �44 _L . ?.V -TZZ -3qZl A� . (;--o ri 'n, , 9/z-eF� ---pophk4- CCA kj ctl- v q- (f f4A fd ,S!5:/ 3 4 &,5rk,0/V2',1 1 2,57 - q LS - --3 S4 451)- 217 446.57 ?TZ - 2-3 7 6-YG) ?� S- �tA.l� 40`� SC ?: L o 1 City off Edina, Minnesota G,II, .1 � ;' ;77 )� GTTV COUNCIL rsr_c,� :inn =L) o 4501 West 50th Street o Edina, N innesota 55424 [3Y - -- - (612) 927 -5561 a (612) 927- 7645 -FAX a (612) 927- 5461 -TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL If - DATE SIDEWALK E ALLEY PAVING 0 WA`)<'ERMAIIN 0 STORM SEWED ❑ SANI'TARY SEWED D STREET LIGHTING R- CURB AND VIjTT -ER ONLY E'PERMANENT S'�RFET 0 OTHER • SUR-kACING WITH TTE s 9 •• To)the.Mayor and City Councij- The persons who have signed. this petitiorr ask.the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. I ,C.1sk"r 1 url V between and (-A?, Iy LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT B'Y SWEET NAME ADDRESS . ! , ADDRESS bet}veen and LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT VY STREET NAME • • ADDRESS = gw' ;. ADDRESS. s� - .beuveen and LOCATI N OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NA IE ADDRESS b .� ADDRESS ' s e between and C- LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPO•RTA,NT N10TE: •THE PERSONS WHO IIAVE'SIGNED '$HIS PETITION UNDiRS'TAND THAT THE CITY CQUNCEL MAY ASSESS THE. COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES )BENEF'TTING FROM THE IMPROVE MENTS-IgAMOUNTS DETEq0MqEID DY,THIE COUNCIL AS AUTHO -RIZEI) BY CHAPTER 4. 9, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) �i ty. PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S PHONE `1 ,mod& X52- �2�> � L � �i I � •� �,L {�c:i c't �c.'� --., � -5�2 � �G( /���:� L`Z� � �5� ��� l�l�D y tion was circulated by: r\o c,-6I 9S2-(176.11 :F NAME ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SEPTEMBER 19M PROPERTY OWNER'S OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S SIGNATURE (PRINTED) PHONE h i k1cw4ftb A ,C.�a -wscs � cvlYr iYl a %c-l�- V.-Mm d?b - yfLt -rac y 55-3-3 !k ICs. 475,9- 83 -ag/l 55* z 41)-1 -cloI ir 9216 35<6) -Z y a 14 `mss "L 2e ^15112, r 2,10 Zi3Z a52• `ll �- Q* I Ja4*-t- 122 7I� S r-i 9SZ5 LS1.5 A. e City of Edina, Minnesota c❑7[`Y COUNCIL 4801 blest 50th Street o Edina, Minnesota 55424 � (612)927 -8861 a (612) 927 - 7645 -FAX a (612) 927 - 5461 -TDD PETITION TO /SIDEWALK ❑ STORM SEWER THE CITY COUNCIL, ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ER ONILY ❑ PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WI`)('IH( CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: DATE: 07 /0 7 ❑ WATi ERMA]IN ❑ S'C'R EIET LIGHTING ❑ OTHER: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the improvements listed above to the locations listed below. / between ` eyy 1 0 vi A� Ie- and AI(y5 ti I y � OW . LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY rET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS between and LOCATION OF IMEPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between and ADDRESS between Ci_, ADDRESS LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITE' COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OIL THESE I WPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS D4 AMOUNTS DETERAHNED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE ' & 14& This petition was circulated by: OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S (PRINTED) PHONE moo ` t'9� 17 i °e CtilKf� Cif;ls�r��b :4Y- %�Io lho� ,66 ✓1 CAo(kooL- S S2� 0U'7Lces '✓1 r,, �(�z el z• -1 `T3,6 5504 IDoncQ&+ey Waq 95'z 92614>I -2- SC-a oA'y1l'e /S(o SS21 1,V'I- q5-2 WO--l`l-?,F NANIE ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SEPTEMBER IP90 PROPER'T'Y OWNER'S % 4��4 � OWNER'S NAME PROPER'T'Y ADDRESS OWNER'S (PRINTE D) u a5z PRONE S-rl G vrj�2(� �t�vlcc4S �,`J 5399 s ok @ City of Edina, Minnesota .' CjTy- 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 55424 _ 4 (612) 9274861 • (612) 927 - 7645 -FAX • (612) 927 - 5461 -TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL KSIDEWALK ❑ STORM SEWER ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ SANITARY SEWER ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER DATE ❑ WATERMAIN ❑ STREET LIGHTING ❑ OTHER: To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the. improvements listed above to the locations listed below. �b/l1folsTtr,� _ between V&y1-- ,,v4,J A` and A,//LSyq/ LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME AD RESS ADDRESS between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS and ADDRESS and ADDRESS and "0]1);7 IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY. COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S PHONE 55-21 �ogs� gsz 9� -136 652.0 [� tires g2r3�1`1 Dowlld lso.. 5521 9sL- 420 - on- se ® !SKi e K%t D�t (ACV rL- This petition was circulated by: ati !e /Soh 552( Covlcz44,- v,,-c qS,2 4�z -IC0 NAME ADDRESS There is space.for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. ,Ovav'�� PHONE SEPTEMBER 1990 PROPERTY OWNWS OWNER'S NAME PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S / ✓ �������cs5t avvt s� Dona PHONE qu�') - (-�Iz t c, s 1 R LJ�D y _ _ r. •f: ¢ ' r is r .,' - ._ .- - { a k Minutes/Edina Cif CounciVf anuary 21, 2003 Member Masica re- entered the Council Chambers. PETTTI FOR SIDEWALK - DONCASTER BETWEEN VERNON/TRACY AND AYRSHIRE Motion made by Member Hovland and seconded by Member Housh acknowledging receipt of a petition for sidewalk at h Doncaster between Vernon/Tracy and Ayrshire, and submission to the Engineering Department for processing as to feasibility. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Maetzold declared the meeting adjourned at 10:15 P.M. City Clerk Page 17 October 17, 2003 City of Edina Doncaster Way Area Residents RE: Resident Update Letter No. 1 Sidewalk Petition Dear Residents: Last spring a petition for sidewalks was submitted to the Edina City Council. The City Council typically refers these petitions to the Engineering Department for further study. All proposed sidewalks must be "petitioned for" by City of Edina Residents. Process for petitioning is the following: 1. Submit Signed Petition to City Clerk, Clerk forwards to City Council 2. Council refers petition to Engineering Department for Feasibility Study 3. Engineering Department surveys area and prepares costs. 4. Neighborhood Information Meeting is held. 5. Engineering Department completes Feasibility Study. 6. Public Hearing is held - residents notified per State Law. 7. City Council hears proposed project and decides on issue - residents can speak publicly (on record) regarding project. 8. if City Council orders project: • Construction documents drafted and publicly bid • Council Awards Bid • Construction starts 9. Final Assessment Hearing is held after project completion. Typical process from start to finish is approximately one to two years. We are currently at step three. As many of you have noticed, City surveyors and traffic safety people were in the neighborhood recently gathering data for the study. We anticipate the study to be completed by the end of the year and will be conducting informational meetings this winter with a public hearing during late winter. Input from residents is very important. You will have many opportunities for input such as at the neighborhood meeting, writing or emailing myself (whoule(aDci.edina.mn.us), and also at the public hearing. Sincerely, Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer C: Edina City Council City Hall (952) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (952) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (952) 826 -0379 Smooth Feed SheetsTM Use template for S160w RESIDENT* RESIDENT* 244 A��* DDirE� ASSIGNED 5405 DONCASTER WAY 5408 DONCASTER WAY EDINA;-MN 00000 - EDINA, MN 55436 EDINA, MN 55436 RESIDENT* RESIDENT* RESIDENT* 5409 DONCASTER WAY 5413 DONCASTER WAY 5417 DONCASTER WAY j EDINA, MN 55436 EDINA, MN 55436 EDINA, MN 55436 RESIDENT* RESIDENT* RESIDENT* 5421 DONCASTER WAY 5500 MERRITT CIR 5501 DONCASTER WAY EDINA, MN 55436 EDINA, MN 55436 EDINA, MN 55436 RESIDENT* RESIDENT* RESIDENT* 5501 MERRITT CIR 5504 DONCASTER WAY 5504 MERRITT CIR EDINA, MN 55436 EDINA, MN 55436 1 ! EDINA, MN 55436 I. RESIDENT* RESIDENT* RESIDENT* 5505 MERRITT CIR 5508 DONCASTER WAY 5508 MERRITT CIR EDINA, MN 55436 EDINA, MN 55436 EDINA, MN 55436 RESIDENT* RESIDENT* RESIDENT* 5509 DONCASTER WAY 5509 MERRITT CIR 55.12 DONCASTER WAY EDINA, MN 55436 2017 EDINA, MN 55436 EDINA, MN 55436 RESIDENT* RESIDENT* RESIDENT* 5512 MERRITT CIR 5513 DONCASTER WAY 5513 MERRITT CIR EDINA, MN 55436 EDINA, MN 55436 2017 EDINA, MN 55436 RESIDENT* RESIDENT* RESIDENT* 5516 DONCASTER WAY 5516 MERRITT CIR 5517 DONCASTER WAY EDINA, MN 55436 EDINA, MN 55436 EDINA, MN 55436 RESIDENT* RESIDENT* RESIDENT* 5517 MERRITT CIR 5520 DONCASTER WAY 5520 MERRITT CIR EDINA, MN 55436 EDINA, MN 55436 EDINA, MN 55436 I RESIDENT* RESIDENT* RESIDENT* 5521 DONCASTER WAY 5524 MERRITT CIR 5525 MERRITT CIR EDINA, MN 55436 EDINA, MN 55436 EDINA, MN 55436 SNAVERY0 Address Labels Laser 51600 Smooth Feed Sheets TM RESIDENT* 5528 MERRITT CIR ,DIVA, MN 55436 RESIDENT* 5605 AYRSHIRE BLVD EDINA, MN 55436 RESIDENT* 5532 MERRITT CIR EDINA, MN 55436 RESIDENT* 5701 AYRSHIRE BLVD EDINA, MN 55436 I /1•R AVERY® Address Labels Use template for 5160@ i RESIDENT* 5536 MERRITT CIR EDINA, MN 55436 i RESIDENT* 5505 DONCASTER WAY EDINA, MN 55436 Laser 51600 city ,of Edina November 1, 2004 Doncaster Way Area Residents Edina, Minnesota RE: Resident Letter No. 2 Informational Meeting Announcement Doncaster Way Sidewalk Project from Vernon Ave/Tracy Ave to 'Highlands School Entrance City of Edina, Improvement No. S -092 Dear Resident: The City of Edina has received a petition for the referenced project. The City Council has ordered staff to provide a feasibility study for this project. See attached location map. We are hosting an Informational Meeting regarding this project to be held on Tuesday, November 9t', from 8:00 to 9:00 p.m., in the Edina City Council Chambers located at 4801 W. 50th Street. (The Council Chambers is immediately to your left as you enter City Hall.) The meeting format will consist of a short presentation followed by an informal question and answer session. The presentation will cover scope of work and average assessment costs. If you are unable to attend, information regarding this project will be available after this meeting. 'Sincerely, slaz--� f lo-1 City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 SIGN -IN SHEET DONCASTER WAY IMPROVEMENT NO. S -092 INFORMATIONAL MEETING NOVEMBER 9, 2004 NAME ADDRESS l �. t350 ) �a-r Gcl 4-1117 June 2, 2005 Doncaster Way Area Residents Edina, Minnesota RE: Resident Letter No. 3 Doncaster Way Sidewalk Project from Vernon Ave/Tracy Ave to Highlands School Entrance and /or to Ayrshire Blvd City of Edina, Improvement No. S -092 Dear Resident: The City of Edina hosted an Informational Meeting regarding the referenced project on November 9, 2004. The meeting was attended by approximately 10 of your neighborhood residents. The following is a summary of the history and issues discussed to date: • Project initiated by residents through petition in January 2003. • Information letter sent to residents on October 17, 2003. • Several `objections" and "non- supporting" letters received by the City from several residents of the neighborhood (2003). • Informational Meeting held on November 9, 2004. • Safety concern for pedestrians. • Not all residents are in favor of constructing sidewalk. Opinions differ regarding which side of the street is more appropriate for sidewalks if constructed. • Sidewalk in this area falls within "School Walking Zone" — qualifies for 25% funding from the school district and 25% from the City to construct a sidewalk. • Sidewalk constructed along Vernon Avenue (if constructed in the area between the roadways of Doncaster Way and Vernon Avenue) would qualify for 100% funding from the State Gas Tax. • Balance of cost of sidewalk would be assessed to neighborhood residents. • Additional maintenance with sidewalks — City would maintain these sidewalks. • Resident concerns with school drop- off /pick -up traffic and potential of re- routing this traffic. • Highlands Elementary . School Site Council and Edina School Board support the project. Doncaster Way Sidewalk - Resident Letter No. 3 June 2, 2005 Page 2 of 2 Prior to proceeding with preparing and presenting a feasibility study to the City Council for consideration and holding a public hearing for this project, staff plans to survey the neighborhood and potentially hold an information meeting regarding this project (which will not be scheduled until early Fall of 2005 due to the current Engineering Department workload). Please contact me at 952 - 826 -0445 or e-mail at slillehaua(o)-ci.edina.mn.us with any further questions or comments. Sincerely, Steven L. Lillehau 9> P.E. > P.T.O.E Assistant City Engineer / Traffic Engineer c: Wayne D. Houle, City of Edina David Wilde, Highlands Elementary School Site Council Ellen Jones, Highlands Elementary School Site Council Peter Hodne, Highlands Elementary School August 8, 2006 Doncaster Way Area Residents Edina, Minnesota Re: Resident Letter No. 4 Doncaster Way Sidewalk Project from Vernon Ave/Tracy Ave. to Ayrshire Blvd. City of Edina Improvement No. S -092 Dear Resident: The City of Edina received a petition to construct a sidewalk along Doncaster Way from Vernon Avenue/Tracy Avenue to Ayrshire Boulevard. Upon receipt, the City Council ordered staff to provide a feasibility study for this project. The following is a summary of the history, issues and potential funding for the project: History • Project initiated by residents through petition in January 2003. • Information letter sent to residents on October 17, 2003. • Several "objections" and "non- supporting" letters received by the City from several residents of the neighborhood (2003- 2005). • Informational Meeting held on November 9, 2004. • Highlands Elementary School Site Council endorsed the project (letter dated February 2, 2005). Issues • Safety concern for pedestrians. • Not all residents are in favor of constructing sidewalk. • Opinions differ regarding which side of the street is more appropriate for sidewalks if constructed. • Additional maintenance with sidewalks — City would maintain these sidewalks. • Resident concerns with school drop- off /pick -up traffic and potential of re- routing this traffic. Funding • Total proposed project cost = $94,000 • Proposed sidewalk falls within "School Walking Zone" — qualifies for 25% funding from the school district and 25% from the City to construct a sidewalk. • Sidewalk constructed along Vernon Avenue (if constructed in the area between the roadways of Doncaster Way and Vernon Avenue) qualifies for 100% funding from the State Gas Tax funds. Doncaster Way Sidewalk — Resident Letter No. 4 August 8, 2006 Page 2of2 • The balance of cost of sidewalk is proposed to be assessed to neighborhood residents (see Figure 1). The assessment is proposed to be $190 per property and equally distributed based on the travel -shed of the official "School Walking Zone ". Prior to preparing a feasibility study and holding a public hearing for this project, we are sending the neighborhood a questionnaire for your input regarding this project (see attached). Please complete and return the questionnaire by Monday, August 21, 2006. Upon compilation and evaluation of the questionnaire results, staff will hold an information meeting for this project prior to presenting the feasibility to the City Council for consideration. Please contact me at 952 - 826 -0445 or e-mail at slillehaug- A-ci.edina.mmus with any further questions or comments. Sincerely, Steven Lillehaug Assistant City Engineer enclosures c: Wayne D. Houle, City of Edina David Wilde, Highlands Elementary School Site Council Ellen Jones, Highlands Elementary School Site Council Peter Hodne, Highlands Elementary School DONCASTER WAY SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS PROPERTY OWNER QUESTIONNAIRE A. Generally, do you support constructing a sidewalk in your neighborhood along Doncaster Way (from Ayrshire Boulevard to Vernon Avenue /Tracy Avenue)? ❑ Yes ❑ No B. From the following described sidewalk locations please tell us your preference regardless of your answer to the previous question. Please rank the options in order from 1 to 4 in the spaces provided below (1 being the most desirable). Constructing a sidewalk along the east side of Doncaster Way south of the school entrance and along the west side north of the school entrance (as shown in the attached Figure 1). Constructing a sidewalk along the west side of Doncaster Way (for the entire length of the project). Constructing a sidewalk along the east side of Doncaster Way (for the entire length of the project). Constructing sidewalks along both sides of Doncaster Way (for the entire length of the project). Please list any specific comments below: Thank you for your cooperation. Please complete all questions and return the questionnaire to us by Monday, August 21, 2006 even if your answers are "No." A postage paid envelope is enclosed for your convenience. Doncaster Way Sidr -nprovements Improveme, ; -092 Survey Tauuidlion HOUSE # STREET Returned Surve General support for Sidewalk East of Doncaster & West side north of school (Figure West side of Doncaster entire length) ( g ) East side of Doncaster entire length) ( g ) Both sides of Doncaster (entire length) COMMENTS Yes NO 5605 BLVD 1 1 1 2 3 4 We support monitoring of school ra ic; o sevance of speed limits and sop sign at rys ire Doncaster, p erha s parking restrictions on one side of Doncaster, Aryshire. JAYRSHIRE 5701 BLVD 1 1 4 3 1 2 After a review of the proposed sidewalk, I concluded it would have very little impact on the safety of our n'hood children; however, the purposed sidewalk would have an adverse impact on the n'hood environment. 5705 AYRSHIRE 1 1 2 3 4 1 This really needs to be done - safety concern. 5709 AYRSHIRE 5713 AYRSHIRE 5804 AYRSHIRE 5808 AYRSHIRE BLVD 1 1 1 3 2 1 4 A sidewalk on the east side of Doncaster Way would be best because it would reduce the risks of crossing the street against traffic halfway up the hill. Even with crossing guards the visibility is limited. 5816 AYRSHIRE BLVD 1 1 1 A sidewalk along Doncaster to Highlands Elem. Is long overdue. We need to keep the children off the street where the cars and school buses race by. Steve, would you please define travel shed, as well as define the residents that are being assess. Thanks. 4350 CT #321 1 1 1 5200 CHANTREY RD 1 1 Never rc'ed any notice in fall of'03 or'04; why not sidewalks for other heavy traveled, cut thru streets: why are proposed areas of assessment excl. streets such as westside of Dundee and Lochloy (and others)? If this is the benefit of Highland School, please add the cost to the school budget 100°/x; perhaps an off site area should be establ. for both walking students and parents who drive their children; the proposed sidewalk will provide minimal increased safety. 5201 ICHANTREY RD 5204 CHANTREY RD 1 1 I think the little darlings can make it to school without a sidewalk. 5205 CHANTREY RD 1 1 1 2 3 4 5208 CHANTREY RD 1 1 1 Having a sidewalk on Doncaster will greatly enhance the safety of pedestrians-without a sidewalk, es cially in the winter, that is a very unsafe street to walk on. 5209 CHANTREY RD 1 1 1 2 3 4 Lonq overduel We're fortunate no children have been injured while walking to /from school. 5213 CHANTREY RD 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 This is utterly not necessary. Children do not walk this route to school, parents drive. 5300 CHANTREY RD 5301 CHANTREY RD 5304 CHANTREY RD 1 1 3 1 2 4 5308 CHANTREY RD 1 1 1 5309 CHANTREY RD 5312 CHANTREY RD 5313 CHANTREY RD 1 1 1 1 3 4 2 5317 CHANTREY RD 1 1 1 5400 CHANTREY RD 1 1 5401 CHANTREY RD 1 1 1 Option 1 has walking school children crossing the street twice. 5404 CHANTREY RD 1 1 3 2 1 4 5405 CHANTREY RD 1 1 1 1 1 1 Yes, we would love any sidewalk! 5408 CHANTREY RD 1 1 We do not attend Highlands School (we bus to OLG) and would not like to pay for sidewalks - we don't want them on our block either! 5409 CHANTREY RD 1 1 1 5500 CHANTREY RD 5501 CHANTREY RD 1 1 1 5504 CHANTREY RD 1 1 1 5505 CHANTREY RD 1 1 My children ave never attended Hig an s school, however. for the safety of e kids walking to and from school, it's a matter of how soon can ou get it done. 5508 CHANTREY RD 1 1 3 2 1 4 e ono un ers an a purpose o e so ewa w en i lus ends at ys ire with no other sidewalks in the neighborhood. 5509 CHANTREY RD 1 1 ' 1 1 1 Doncaster Way Sidewalk Improvements Improvement No. S -092 Survey Tabulation HOUSE # STREET Returned Survey General support for Sidewalk. East of Doncaster & West side north of school (Figure West side of Doncaster entire length) ( g ) East side of Doncaster entire length) ( g ) Both sides of Doncaster (entire length) COMMENTS es No 5512 CHANTREY RD 1 1 As a resident of Chantrey, the proposed sidewalk provides me with no benefit; further, since my family would not be using it, I cannot have a preference for how it is located on Doncaster. .5513 CHANTREY RD 1 1 5516 CHANTREY RD 5517 CHANTREY RD 5520 CHANTREY RD 5521 CHANTREY RD 1 1 5524 CHANTREY RD 1 1 4 2 1 3 5525 See attached comments. 5528 CHANTREY RD 1. 1 Even though my children walked to school or went a block further away to catch the school bus, I have observed that current students living on Chantrey have the Edina School Bus stop right in front of their houses to pick them up, so none of them would have need of a sidewalk or would benefit from said sidwalk; as far as we're concerned a sidewalk in that location is totally unnecessary and a waste of money. Our children and grandchildren walked to Highlands from our home on Chantrey for many years. 5529 CHANTREY RD 1 1 2 3 1 4 5532 CHANTREY RD 5533 CHANTREY RD 5536 CHANTREY RD 1 1 3 1 2 4 5537 CHANTREY RD 1 1 5200 DONCASTER 5201 DONCASTER 1 1 1 3 2 4 5207 DONCASTER 1 1 1 5209 DONCASTER 1 1 2 1 The entire neighborhood needs sidewalks!! 5213 DONCASTER 1 1 2 3 1 4 We are very supportive of the sidewalk for safety reasons. 5217 DONCASTER WAY 1 1 3 Noticed that map does not include Lochloy, Duncraig and Glenbrae. Many young children reside on these streets and I hope their feedback will be taken into account as well. 5221 DONCASTER 1 1 4 3 2 1 5225 DONCASTER 5229 DONCASTER 1 1 1 3 2 4 Our house lot is not involved - our primary concern is for the safety of the school children. 5405 DONCASTER 1 1 1 1 do not sup ort this project. 5408 DONCASTER 1 1 2 3 1 4 5409 DONCASTER 1 1 Do no support the need for a sidewalk. Doesn't fit the neighborhood at all. 5413 DONCASTER 5417 DONCASTER 1 1 See attached letter. 5421 DONCASTER WAY 1 1 No means no. I will not "rank' my preferences to something I have already stated objection to. It's a loaded uestion, don't you agree? 5501 DONCASTER WAY 1 1 o means none. n ug 16. 2006, 11 residents of Doncaster betw Ayrshire & ernon met. The vote of all pr esent was "no" regarding any sidewalk whatsoever. 5504 DONCASTER,, 1 1 4 2 3 1 5508 DONCASTER WAY 1 1 1 Don't have an opinon where to put sidewalk; ambivalent about the choices; the 'where' is not as important as the need for the sidewalk immediately. 5509 DONCASTER 1 1 2 4 3 1 5512 DONCASTER WAY 1 1 2 3 1 4 In addition to comments already sent, the larger lots on upper Doncaster can more easily accommodate /absorb the space required for a sidewalk. 5513 DONCASTER 5516 DONCASTER 1 1 1 5517 IDONCASTER WAY 1 1 V 'On the even #'d side theer are no trees blocking this side of the road; I am more concerned about the "limestone retaining wall" at 5520 Doncaster that keeps pilling limestone rock on the road..please build a better wall! See diagram. If sidewalk is constructed please conserve the trees. Doncaster Way Sic' Improvements Improveme, S -092 Survey Tabulation HOUSE # STREET Returned Surve General support for Sidewalk East of Doncaster & West side north of school (Figure 1) West side of Doncaster (entire length) East side of Doncaster (entire length) Both sides of Doncaster (entire length) COMMENTS es o 5520 DONCASTER 5521 DONCASTER WAY 1 1 1 3 2 4 Residents should know that the school board has approved the project funding and has set aside money for this specific project. 5213 DUNDEE RD 1 1 5405 DUNDEE RD 1 1 1 Trs-e-e-m-s-fffe-erwould be fewer trees removea it it was on the west si e, but Fig. I ma es more sense; why are we in the school walking zone "travel -shed" but our n'bors across the street (on the same street) are not. I know you have to draw a line somewhere, but that doesn't seem right. 5501 DUNDEE RD 1 1 1 2 3 4 As long as it is on one side, we don't care. Our preference is above, but if its all or nothing, we'd be happy with anything. 5505 DUNDEE RD 1 1 1 5509 DUNDEE RD 5513 DUNDEE RD 1 1 1 3 2 4 5517 DUNDEE RD 1 1 2 3 1 4 Thanks for attention to this issue. 5521 DUNDEE RD 5525 DUNDEE RD 5529 DUNDEE RD 1 1 1 5533 DUNDEE RD 1 1 I fail to see what and who will benefit from this. I see no reason to build a sidewalk. WE have been just fine for the last 50 years without them. 5537 DUNDEE RD 5200 GLENGARRY 5204 GLENGARRY PKWY 1 1 None, as far as preference - there is no need for sidewalks now. How did we survive without them before? 5208 GLENGARRY PKWY 1 1' 1 *Unless you include upper ig an s oya n; o not understand the logic of eavmg out o the proposed assessment all the homes in upper Highlands (Lochloy, Croyden, etc.) They benefit equally or more than homes twice as far away! Also Goya Ln, they are only one lot away from sidewalk. 5212 GLENGARRY 1 1 No preference. 5300 GLENGARRY 1 1 2 4 3 1 Waste of $, not needed. 5304 GLENGARRY 1 1 1 5308 GLENGARRY 1 1 1 5312 GLENGARRY 1 1 1 3 2 4 The sooner the better for kids walking to school! 5400 GLENGARRY 1 1 5404 GLENGARRY 5408 1GLENGARRY PKWY 1 1 3 2 1 4 The sidewalk would serve primarily kids if it is split east/west mid -block where the school is. It seems that it would serve the general population better if it stays on one side for the length of the street. Thanks for considering this project - it will greatly improve safety. 5500 GLENGARRY 1 1 1 5501 GLENGARRY 1 1 4 4 4 4 Ridiculous! Nobody wants sidewalks in our neighborhood. 5504 GLENGARRY PKWY 1 1 2 1 4 3 Even though our children won't benefit from this improvement we fee it is an unsafe way for kids to walk to school. We thinkt he west side because most of the walkers will come from that directions. I really think this area desperately need some street lights. Glengarry Pkwy is pitch black at nights. 5505 GLENGARRY 5508 GLENGARRY 5509 GLENGARRY PKWY 1 1 3 2 1 4 Before a decision is made to build the sidewalk, I'd be interested in how many children walk to school. Seems most arents drive them. 5512 ARR PKWY 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 ummar o t eir comments: retired couple, strongly oppose due to increased taxes from other school assessments; let petitioners raise money or pay for sidewalks themselves.. 5513 GLENGARRY 5516 GLENGARRY Doncaster Way Sidewalk Improvements Improvement No. 5 -092 Survey Tabulation General support East.of Doncaster West side of East side of Both sides of for & West side north Doncaster Doncaster Doncaster COMMENTS HOUSE Returned Sidewalk of school (Figure (entire length) (entire length) (entire length) es No # STREET Survey 5517 GLENGARRY 1 1 1 5520 GLENGARRY 1 1 This sidewalk only damages property. It doesnot improve walking for school children. 5521 GLENGARRY N ARR is is a very important protect an should be expe ite a have not allowed our daughter to 5524 PKWY 1 1 1 3 4 2 walk to school because of safety concerns on Doncaster. 5525 GLENGARRY Will there be a sidewalk constructed from street into school? How many injuries /casualties have there been since school constructed? Are there more injuries /risks here than on other Edina streets? How many students walk to school at Highland? What percentage of those GLENGARRY attending walk ?. What about posting school zone speed limits & signs? Speed bumps? Stop 5528 PKWY 1 1 signs? GLENGARRY 1 & 2 Aryshire and Doncaster create a four way slop with crosswalk markings. This would slow 5529 PKWY 1 1 3 4 2 1 traffic with both the school lane and park. 5532 GLENGARRY 5533 GLENGARRY Since most of the map in blue are "walkers' more sidewalks would be welcomed! It's about 5800 HIDDEN LA 1 1 1 time. 5801 HIDDEN LA 5804 HIDDEN LA 1 1 1 5805 HIDDEN LA 1 1 1 5808 HIDDEN LA 5809 HIDDEN LA 1 1 4 2 1 3 I had a caddie at Interlachen this weekend who lived on Doncaster. He thought the sidewalk was a good idea - but thought it might not go through because of a couple "grumpy" old guys! 5812 HIDDEN LA 1 1 Keep the kids safe! 5813 HIDDEN LA See attached letter. The above implies a foregone conclusion by asking where even if you 5500 MERRITT CIR 1 1 don't want it. A sidewalk is not needed rom Ayrshire tote school entrance. The residents in this area d not want a sidewalk. If the residents from Vernon to the school entrance are in favor of a sidewalk there - put it in for them and respect the wishes of the rest of the property owners that 5501 IMERRITT CIR 1 1 are directly impacted. Please re -read the attached letter. 5504 MERRITT CIR 1 1 5505 MERRITT CIR 1 1 1 5508 MERRITT CIR No records of any safety problems. Children uses school uses. We strongly feel t at it wouTF 5509 MERRITT CIR 1 1 4 4 4 4 be a waste of funds for this purpose. 5512 MERRITT CIR 5513 MERRITT CIR 1 1 1 This is very important to the safety of our children. Please let usknow what we can do to help 5516 MERRITT CIR 1 1 1 1 pass the sidewalk. 5517 MERRITT CIR 1 1 1 5520 MERRITT CIR 1 1 1 Sidewalk should be paid by ublic funds. This is not needed. I have lived on Merritt for 20 yrs. Traffic is light and the width of the area streets provide no safety hazard. No, I'm not supportive of this, so answer is neither side of the 5524 MERRITT CIR 1 1 street!!! 5525 MERRITT CIR 1 1 1 5528 MERRITT CIR Doncaster Way Sir' Improvements Improvem S -092 Survey . _,ation HOUSE # STREET Returned Surve General support for Sidewalk East of Doncaster 8 West side north of school (Figure West side of Doncaster (entire length) East side of Doncaster (entire length) Both sides of Doncaster (entire length) COMMENTS es No 5532 MERRITT CIR 1 1 1 1 2' 4 3 'Ana the northSide of en Praine Ratuoricaster a errs and bbZU Doncaster; n include a sidewalk on the northside of Doncaster at 5525 Merritt and 5520 Doncaster. A sidewalk is badly needed. We have lived here almost 11 yrs and I have never allowed my kids to walk alone to school because it is absolutely unsafe to do so (1.5 blocks). The children walking in the street up Doncaster (south) betw. 8:20 -8:35 is a disaster waiting to happen. Cars go too fast..... See rest of letter 5536 MERRITT CIR 1 1' Not until the city does something to alleviate the dangerous driving conditions from Vemon/Tracy /56th /Doncaster /Merritt. With how the drivers handle their vehicles I would not endorse children or adults walking on the proposed sidewalks. 5100 MIRROR LAKES DR 1 1 3 1 2 4 I have no particular objection to this project but I do not want to be assessed for it. We live at the opposite end of the n'hood and would not use this sidewalk. 5101 MIRROR 5104 MIRROR 1 1 1 1 2 3 4 5105 MIRROR 1 1 There is not enough traffic to warrant this. 5108 MIRROR FAKES DR 1 1 This is misleading. There should be another option under B stating "I do not support constructing a sidewalk in the designated area. See attached letter. 51091 MIRROR LAKES DR 1 1 Since our children did not walk to Highlands I do not understand the specifica needs which drive the sidewalk placement. Bus service is provided to the residences along our stretch of Mirror Lakes, so we have not been part of the "school walk zone" unless the zone was changed since lastspring - the 05/06) school year. 5113 MIRROR 1 1 5116 MIRROR 1 1 5117 MIRROR 1 1 1 5120 MIRROR 1 1 5121 MIRROR 5124 MIRROR 1 1 5125 MIRROR 1 1 5128 MIRROR 1 1 1 5129 MIRROR 5132 MIRROR 5133 MIRROR 1 1 1 Do it right - do both sides of the road. 5201 MIRROR ILAKES DR 1 1 I do not want to pay any assessments for some one else - if they want it - they pay for it. I am still paying for assessments for the poor street repavement on Mirror Lakes. I can't even get the city street dept to come and repair the crumbling street on Northwoods. The street dept is run by a bunch of high schol kids who run around in a Edina truck - doing nothing - check that out. 5205 MIRROR 5209 MIRROR 5214 MIRROR 5301 MIRROR 5305 MIRROR LAKES DR 1 1 The schools are short of ; the city should be; the state Fas no funds to improve roads; now all kids in our area take the bus; no walkers. No accidents on Doncaster for 25 years. Let me know about any meetings, I will fight this dumb idea. 5309 MIRROR 5317 MIRROR 1 1 1 2 3 4 Very much so! We really need this sidewalk. Many children run along the street very unsafe) 5401 MIRROR 1 1 1 2 3 4 5405 MIRROR 5408 MIRROR 1 1 Since I don't support having a sidewalk, I have no opinion as to where it might o! 5500 MIRROR 1 1 Kids don't walk to school anymore - this is a waste of taxpayer money! 5501 MIRROR 5504 MIRROR 1 1 1 4 3 2 5505 MIRROR 1 1 4 4 4 4 5509 MIRROR 1 1 4 Doncaster Way Sic' -nprovements Improvem, -092 Survey 1, .,ion General support East of Doncaster for & West side north West side of East side of Both'sides of HOUSE Returned Sidewalk of school (Figure Doncaster Doncaster Doncaster COMMENTS 1) ( entire length) ) (entire length) (entire length) es o # STREET Survey 5512 MIRROR 5513 MIRROR 1 1 IMIRROR The lots on the east side are deeper and and the homes set much higher on the sites, 5.516 LAKES DR 1 1 2 - 3 1 4 especially north of the school. 5517 MIRROR 5521 MIRROR 1 1 1 5524 MIRROR 5525 MIRROR 5528 MIRROR 1 1 2 3 1 4 5529 MIRROR 1 1 I am upset that the city has invested its time and taxpayer money in a project that affects so MIRROR few people. Thank you for contacting us, but we would hope the city would realize that after 3.5 5532 LAKES DR 1 1 ears, among other things, residents moved and enjoy living here without sidewalks. We are opposed only to the inclusion of such a large area in the assessment. Kids cannot walk to school along Mirror Lakes and Ayrshire and lheefore, this stretch of sidewalk will provide absolutely no benefit to most of Mirror Lakes, and we don't feel we should be assessed. Due to MIRROR the speed and volume of traffic cutting through on Mirror Laks we would not be comfortable 5533 LAKES DR 1 1 2 3 1 4 having our kids walk, especially in the winter. 5536 MIRROR Traffic is light enough that a sidewalk is unnecessary. We did not get an information letter in Oct. 2003. We did not get notice of an informational meeting to be held in Nov 2004 and therefore did not attend. Children in our n'hood ride the bus to Highlands and therefore MIRROR sidewalks on Doncaster should be paid for by the residents on Doncaster, who will benefit by 5537 LAKES DR 1 1 them. 5541 MIRROR 1 1 4 9 4 4 The small amount of foot traffic doesn't warrant this expenditure. 5700 NORTHWOOD 5706 NORTHWOOD 1 1 5710 NORTHWOOD 1 1 4 4 4 4 5801 NORTHWOOD 1 1 None of the options. 5804 NORTHWOOD 1 1 1 3 2 4 5808 NORTHWOOD 1 1 1 5809 NORTHWOOD 5812 NORTHWOOD 1 1 3 2 1 4 5813 NORTHWOOD 1 1 1 Thank you for your hard work. 5816 NORTHWOOD 1 1 3 2 1 4 We are opposed to this project. 5817 NORTHWOOD 5820 DR 1 1 3 ommum y sidewalks should a paid or by all ina residents, no y assessmen . e 5824 NORTHWOOD 1 1 2 1 4 would be assessed yet live so far away that we would never use these sidewalks. 1 It really does not matter to us which side its on. We just need one. 5816 NORTHWOOD Why are all of the neighbors in Highlands not sharing in the costs (i.e. west side Dundee residents & Lochloy residents)? How about a sidewalk on Mirror Lakes ... lots of kids and very 5800 SOUTH DR 1 1 1 dangerous street!!! 5801 SOUTH DR If this is a safety issue for school, then the entire community (Edina) whould be willing to pay 5804 SOUTH DR 1 1 for that safety regardless of where the school is. 5805 5808 SOUTH DR SOUTH DR " 1 1 1 It's about time - my kids are post college and we've talked about it for 15 years. Too much for residents and school district school district has much better things to spend $ on. To the best of my knowledge, there have not been any children hurt - we have a child that 5809 SOUTH DR 1 1 attends Highlands. Doncaster Way Sidewalk Improvements Improvement No. S -092 Survey Tabulation General support East of Doncaster for &West side north West side of East side of Both sides of HOUSE Returned Sidewalk of school (Figure Doncaster Doncaster Doncaster COMMENTS # STREET Surve Yes o 1) ( entire length) ) (entire length) .(entire length) Total Surveyed: 146 65 81 138 142 137 196 206 71% 45% 55% August 8, 2007 Doncaster Way Area Residents Edina, Minnesota RE: Resident Letter No. 5 Informational Meeting Announcement Doncaster Way Sidewalk Project from Vernon Ave/Tracy Ave to Ayrshire Blvd City of Edina, Improvement No. S -092 Dear Resident: The City Council has ordered a public hearing regarding the above reference project at the September 4, 2007 City Council meeting. Prior to the public hearing City staff will host an Informational Meeting on Wednesday, August 15, from 6:00 to 8:00 p.m., in the Edina City Council Chambers located at 4801 W. 50th Street. (The Council Chambers is immediately to your left as you enter City Hall.) At the Informational Meeting the City will provide a draft feasibility report for the project. If you are unable to attend, information regarding this project will be available after this meeting. Sincerely, Jack D. Sullivan Assistant City Engineer GAEngineedng \Improvements \S092 Doncaster WayWDMUCORR \Resident Letter No 5.doc 8/8/2007 September 29, 2003 Edina City Council Members Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina MN 55424 Re: Doncaster Way Proposed Sidewalk Council Members: I have been made aware that there is a movement afoot to install sidewalks on Doncaster Way, extending from Tracy Avenue to Ayrshire Boulevard. I presume this is to serve the children who attend Highlands Elementary School. If the is$ue is safety, and the threat is from the endless parade of SUVs and minivans that regularly travel up and down Doncaster Way when school is in session, then the answer to the sidewalk question is: ride the buses provided by the school district! I understand the school bus excludes no one and yet, I watch daily as the 1/4 full buses pass by my house.... followed by the parade of vehicles. It seems to me that we could eliminate the perceived "need" for a sidewalk, if the children would only ride the buses that are provided for them. In addition to providing unused bus service, you are now proposing the additional cost of curbs, sidewalks, retaining walls and maintenance? Can this be true? You would prefer to wipe out the rural atmosphere that sets much of Edina a part from Minneapolis? I am certain that on the seventy active buses and the six back up buses the school district has, there must be room for a few additional passengers. I thought the intent of school buses was to ensure that the students arrived safely and on a uniform schedule, so that the school day could start without the interruption caused by the irregular arrival of vehicles. Highlands School has been in service for almost fifty years. I have lived in front of the school for 31 years. I would argue that, until the proliferation of the SUV /minivan, we have managed just fine. Did the families who are now in favor of the sidewalk not notice the location of the school and the lack of sidewalks while researching the neighborhood they were considering? The Kid's Club children start arriving at 7:00 am and are picked up by 6:00 pm by the SUV /minivan parade - that accounts for approximately 60 children and 240 vehicle trips per school day (coming and going twice a day for drop off and pick up rendering four vehicle trips per child). That leaves approximately 440 students to be served by our bus fleet. Let's assume that the capacity on each bus is 60 students. We need 7.33 buses to serve the remaining 440 students. We have 70 + 6 buses. More than enough, you have to agree. Even if the children of the proponent families are in kindergarten this year, they will use the sidewalk for four more years, in fair weather only, I might add. Those of us who live along Doncaster Way will be left to look at the sidewalk long after these children have moved on. Furthermore, the argument seems to be that the only unsafe portion of the route runs from Tracy Avenue to Ayrshire Boulevard. What is to become of the children once they cross Ayrshire? Take your chances kid, you're on your own now. We will provide safe passage for you for 1/4 quarter mile .... that's it. Why stop with just a couple blocks of sidewalk? Why not just pave the whole city? Pave the city and outlaw all school bus, SUV and minivan trips up and down the street. I invite someone from your office to sit in my driveway during the morning and afternoon school rush hours to simply watch the empty buses pass, followed by the vehicles. Bring a counter and a folding chair. Observe the bus to SUV /minivan ratio. Do the research. Look in to the lack of bus ridership and ask yourself (and the parents) why? The real issue is that students are not riding the buses - they are being dropped off by their parents instead. A sidewalk is not the answer! Do you believe the old adage "if you build it, they will walk ". I think not! You seem to be giving consideration to those in favor of the sidewalk. I would ask that the same consideration be given to those who are opposed. Robert E. Westlund EDINA CITY COUNCIL 4801 W 50" STREET EDINA, MN 55424 RE: PROPOSED SIDEWALKS IN THE HIGHLANDS AREA DEAR READERS, I ACCIDENTALLY FOUND OUT ABOUT THE SIDEWALKS BEING PROPOSED FOR OURNEIGHBORHOOD. NEIGHBORS WHO DON'T HAVE SCHOOL AGE CHILDREN PRESENTLY ATTENDING HIGHLANDS ELEMENTARY WERE LEFT OUT OF ANY SURVEY OR PETITION SOLICITATION. THERE HAS BEEN NOTHING IN THE WEEKLY SCHOOL NEWSLETTER ABOUT THIS PROPOSAL. I HAVE LIVED AT MY PRESENT ADDRESS SINCE OCTOBER 1970. IN ALL THAT TIME THERE HAS BEEN NO DESIRE EXPRESSED BY THE RESIDENTS FOR A SIDEWALK. WE HAVE ENJOYED THE RURAL. FEEL AND APPEARANCE OF THE HIGHLANDS AREA. HOMES, WHICH ARE OFFERED FOR SALE WITHIN THIS AREA, SELL QUICKLY TE AT EVER INCREASING THE RURAL LOOK OF CUR NEIGHBORHOOD. �RS ALSO APPRECIATE ARE PERHAPS SOME DISADVANTAGES. WHEN MY CHILDREN WERE GROWING UP WE HAD TO BE CAREFUL ABOUT LETTING THEM PLAY IN THE STREET, PARTICULARLY IF THERE WAS A GAME AT THE PARK. I DON'T THINK A SIDEWALK WILL HELP THIS CONCERN. IF THE CONCERN IS WITH THE TRAFFIC WHEN SCHOOL IS STARTING AND ENDING,. THEN RESTRICT CARS FROM ENTERING THE SCHOOL PARKING LOT BEGINNING 10 MINUTES BEFORE SCHOOL STARTS/ENDS UNTIL AFTER THE BUSES HAVE DISCHARGED THEIR PASSENGERS AND /OR LEFT THE AREA. THIS WOULD PROBABLY ELI IINATE A LOT OF THE DROP OFF/ PICK UP TRAFFIC WHERE THE CHILD COULD JUST AS WELL HAVE TAKEN THE BUS. IT WOULD PROBABLY REQUIRE SOME SECURITY TYPE PERSONNEL, AT LEAST INITIALLY, TO ENFORCE THE RESTRICTION. THAT WOULD ALSO MAKE IT SAFER FOR THOSE CHILDREN WHO WALK IN THE SCHOOL PARKING LOT AND DRIVEWAY. I SUGGEST YOU HAVE AN OFFICER CHECK THE PRESENT PARKING AND SPEED IN THE LOT AND DRIVEWAY. I THINK YOU WILL BE SURPRISED AT WHAT YOU FIND. A SIDEWALK IS NOT GOING TO EASE THE MOST DANGEROUS PART OF THE TREK TO SCHOOL. THANK YOU FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. 5500 MERRITT-CIRCLE EDINA, MN 55436 City Of EdI113 October 17, 2003 Mr. Robert E. Westlund 5421 Doncaster Way Edina, MN 55436 RE: Doncaster Way Proposed Sidewalk Dear Mr.Westlund: The Edina City Council requested staff to respond to your letter dated September 29. The Engineering Department is currently exploring the option of placing a sidewalk along Doncaster Way. This study is a result of a petition submitted to the Edina City Council. Attached you will find a resident update letter explaining the process for a sidewalk petition. I will keep your letter on file and include it with our feasibility study. As you will see in the Resident Update Letter there will be more opportunity for input as the study progresses. As of this time no sidewalk project has been ordered by the City Council. If you have . any questions or need additional information please contact me at 952- 826 -0443 or at whoule(o)ci.edina.mn.us. Sincerely, Gam/ Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer Enclosures C: Edina City Council City Hall (952) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (952) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (952) 826 -0379 N 4. City Of TUina October 17, 2003 Mr. Robert E. Westlund 5421 Doncaster Way Edina, MN 55436 RE: Doncaster Way Proposed Sidewalk Dear Mr.Westlund: The Edina City Council requested staff to respond ,to your letter dated September 29. The Engineering Department is currently exploring the option of placing a sidewalk along Doncaster Way. This study is a result of a petition submitted to the Edina City Council. Attached you will find a resident update letter explaining the process for a sidewalk petition. I will keep your letter on file and include it with our feasibility study. As you will see in the Resident Update Letter there will be more opportunity for input as the study progresses. As of this time no sidewalk project has been ordered by the City Council. If you have . any questions or need additional information please contact me at 952- 826 -0443 or at whoule(aD-ci.edina.mn.us. Sincerely, //v 4 '4/� Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer Enclosures C:. Edina City Council City Hall (952) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (952) 826 -039( EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (952) 826 -0375 From: Barbara Felker [brunohunt @sprynet.com] Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 11:18 AM To: whoule @ci.edina.mn.us Subject: Doncaster Way sidewalks vy e received your letter number one regarding the sidewalks proposed for the Highlands area. Your letter says that a petition was submitted to the city council. I would like to know where the petitioners live. Do they live in the area for which they are petitioning a sidewalk? The neighbors to whom I have spoken did not know anything about the sidewalk. I know that I was never contacted and found out about the sidewalk accidentally while attending an open house at the school. I am not sure where the proposed sidewalk is to be. I do know that I personally do not wish to see our rural peaceful neighborhood turned into a type of community with sidewalks and streetlights every 100 feet. When the streets were replaced in this area, the curb and gutter option was turned down as the residents felt that if this option was selected, sidewalks would follow. At this time I feel that the city is wasting tirne and money on a project that the residents of the neighborhood do not want. I also feel that the most dangerous part of any child walking to Highland School is the trip through the parking lot. The vehicles entering and leaving the area travel at excessive speeds and tend to ignore all traffic and parking signs. Even if the sidewalks are not put on all the streets in our area,, they will still impact the whole area, creating more traffic and resulting in more litter left behind. Thank you for your time. Arthur J. Felker 5500 Merritt Circle Edina, MN 55436 952- 929 -2813 - -- Barbara Felker - -- brunnohunt. @4spiynet,cQm - -- EarthLink: The #1 provider of the Real Internet. Page 1 of r Wayne Houle To: brunohunt @sprynet.com Subject: RE: sidewalk Barbara: Thank you for your email. As per the recent resident update letter, our surveyors are just gathering data so we can complete the feasibility study that includes cost of a sidewalk. No project has been ordered by the City Council at this time. We will have an informational meeting once we have enough data to share. Thanks Wayne Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 whoule @ci.edina.mn.us 952 - 826 -0443 direct 952 - 826 -0390 fax - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Barbara Felker [mailto:brunohunt @ sprynet.com] Sent: Friday, October 24, 2003 8:16 AM To: whoule Subject: sidewalk I saw the survey crew in our neighborhood on Wednesday this week. I gather this means we are going to get a sidewalk whether we want one or not. It seems a shame that one person can do something that will affect the whole neighborhood. Especially when it is being done out of spite. Just because a neighbor objected to their yard being used as pathway to the school, we all must suffer. Those of us who bought our homes and knew there were no sidewalks in the area are perfectly happy with the present appearance of the neighborhood. Arthur J. Felker 5500 Merritt Circle Edina, MN 55436 - -- Barbara Felker - -- bi-unohunt@apiyiiet.com sprynet.com - -- EarthLink: The #1 provider of the Real Internet. 10/24/2003 October 27, 2003 Edina City Council 4801 W. 5e Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Process for sidewalks on Doncaster Way Residents whose properties would be directly impacted by the building of sidewalks (on their properties) have already sent several letters to the City Council. As a result of one or more of the residents' letters, Mr. Wayne Houle (Director of Public Works /City Engineer), hereafter referred to as "Mr. Houle ", sent Doncaster Way Area Residents an October 17 letter, which described a "Petition ". We, the below undersigned, believe the City Council does not know important objective evidence surrounding Mr. Houle's involvement, nor is the City Council aware of several major flaws in the Process to date. We believe strongly that the items below must be addressed and rectified: 1. The °Petition" was signed by "4 or 5" households, as quoted to Doncaster Way resident Robert Westlund by Mr. Houle in a phone conversation on October 23, 2003. Does such a small number (4 or 5) constitute a sufficient number of petitioners, according to the City's pre- existing Standard Operating Procedures? We think not, as the city could be flooded by any number of "petitions ", which would bring chaos to our city government, assuming the 9 Step Petition Process would be followed, as outlined in Mr. Houle's October 17 letter. We want to know what the legal precedent for a bone fide Petition is? 2. We have knowledge that the persons spearheading the °petition" were Scott and Becky Danielson of 5521 Doncaster Way, as they had asked several other Doncaster residents (who declined) to sign the "petition ". The City Council should be aware of the fact that the Danielsons and Mr. and Mrs. Houle have kids who attend the Highlands Elementary School. Furthermore, they (the parents) are friends who sometimes socialize together. We believe that Mr. Houle should be disassociated from the entire sidewalk Process immediately, as he cannot be viewed as an impartial Third Party. The City Council needs to supervise this process in a way that removes Mr. Houle's decision - making power. The City Council needs to -carry out this. process with absolute ethics and integrity. 3. Related to points 1 and 2 above: On October 1, 2003 Becky Danielson made a very telling quote, in the presence of several parents (including one of the below undersigned). It was: "We got our sidewalk ". We believe this quote ties directly to Mr. Houle's implementation of this process and his lack of independence. In other words, his decision seems to be a foregone conclusion, but he has to make it look as though the Process" is being followed. 4. At Step 7 in the Process (see Mr. Houle's Oct. 17 letter), the letter states that the "City Council hears proposed project and decides on issue ". In the October 23 phone conversation between Mr. Houle and resident Mr. Westllund, Mr. Houle stated the project will move forward if 35% or more of the directly affected residents vote "yes ". We question how as few as 35% can dictate the fate of the other 65 %, who would not favor it? This does not sound like democracy nor sound representative city government. What are the facts here? Page 2 Oct. 27, 2003 Doncaster Sidewalk Process 5. We residents were aware that, as'a.part of data collection for the proposed sidewalk, traffic counters were installed to collect data on the number of vehicles that drove on Doncaster Way. We believe the data to be severely flawed, i.e. traffic vehicle numbers will be grossly inflated, because the very day on which the counter was set up across the 5400 block of Doncaster Way was the afternoon on which all the dozens of prospective parents drove Doncaster Way both to and from Highlands Park for soccer tryouts, etc (a once per year event). This was extraordinarily - increased traffic, and the count is not reliable. If this data is being used in any way to make the sidewalk decision, the data is flawed, and another survey should be done. We believe that the Edina City Council. needs to fulfill its customary responsibility as a prudent overseer of its employees and its processes. The Council needs to take charge of the Doncaster Sidewalk process and exercise due diligence. Yours truly, Name D . F f L� wV--j Address .5 f � �� � It Jr `' 7 0 6-2 Ig 7 Dear Residents: Thank you for your thoughtful letter of October 27, 2003,.with respect to the process for sidewalks on Doncaster Way. I hope that I can respond to the issues you have raised on behalf of the City Council. Number of signatures required for a valid petition. The process followed by the City for considering public improvements that will or may be assessed to benefited properties is outlined in Chapter 429 of State law. The law does not require that a certain number of property owners sign a petition. In fact, the City Council can initiate a project without a petition. However, State law requires that if less than 35% of the benefited property owners have signed a petition or if the project was initiated by the Council without a petition, then at least four of the five city council members must vote in favor of the project. If more than '35% have so signed, then the improvement can be authorized with only a 3/5 vote of the Council. (It appears there was some confusion on this "35% requirement" as a result of a phone conversation.) Process following receipt of a petition. After receiving a petition, the city staff places the matter on the Council agenda for action. Typically, the City Council refers the petition and its requested improvement to the appropriate city department (typically the Engineering Department) for a "feasibility study". The purpose of this study is to determine if the requested project is possible from an engineering perspective and to determine its estimated cost and how it would be financed. Following completion of the study, the Council then decides if they should proceed to conduct a public hearing on the proposed project and consider its authorization. Presently, the Engineering Department is in the "feasibility study" phase of the process. Public hearing. If the Council decides to consider the project after completion of the feasibility study, it will call for a public hearing. Individual mailed notices will be sent to all property owners who are proposed to be assessed for all or part of the cost of the project. At the hearing, the Council receives the report of the City Engineer and receives any testimony, both written and in person, from affected property owners. Decision making. The Council makes their decision on the project after the public hearing is concluded. Although the Council carefully considers the views of affected residents, they may authorize the project even if a majority of the abutting residents are opposed. (Subject of course to the 35% rule mentioned earlier.) In such a case, the Council will consider if there is a "greater good" for the project from a public perspective that outweighs the views of abutting residents. Traffic volume data. I am sure that the Council will take your comments and concerns with respect to the date that traffic volumes were surveyed into consideration. However, I am not sure that there is a "typical day" at an Edina school. The Engineering Department will review this to determine if another survey is warranted. Wayne Houle's involvement I hope you will understand that the process we follow is rich with oversight. The decision on whether to proceed with this project. is not Wayne's, but rather the City Council. The decision is made publicly after everyone with a view is heard. Many of us are faced from time to time with a project or activity of the City that may affect us personally. It is important that our professionalism dictates our actions and that we present a fair and unbiased analysis of the facts for our decision makers. I believe Wayne is doing this and therefore I see no reason why he should recuse himself. Thank you again for your letter. Sincerely, GLH cc. Mayor and Council James P. Kelly 5701 Ayrshire Blvd. Edina Mn. 55436 10/27/03 Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works/ City Engineer 4801 West 50"' Street Edina, Mn. 55424 Dear Mr. Houle Thank you for the information you provided to me on 10/20/03 which answered some of my concerns. I did some objective analysis of the traffic involving school children. On 10/22/03 I observed a total of four children walking down Doncaster past my house after school. On 10/24/03, from 3:50 to 4:10 PM, I observed six children crossing Doncaster at the patrolled crosswalk of which four children proceeded down Doncaster on the right side of the street. I did some inquiries with a neighbor who has school age children and concluded the support for a sidewalk is more emotional than logical. Based on my observations and review I am firmly opposed to the installation of a sidewalk on Doncaster. A vote by all the Doncaster residents would be welcome vs the petition orchestrated by one or two residents within their network. Sincerely � ames P. Kelly Monday, October 27, 2003 Wayne Houle City of Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Wayne: Thank you for your letter regarding the proposed sidewalk dated October 17. 1 would like to take a moment to share my views on the matter. Like many residents on or near Doncaster Way, I have concerns about traffic and the safety of my two preschool aged daughters as well as other children in the neighborhood. And although I respect the opinion of those leading and supporting the sidewalk proposal, I do not support the proposal. I do however support traffic control methods that might include stop signs, pinch points, speed bumps, etc. Even in the absence of traffic control measures, I would still not support the sidewalk proposal for the following reasons: • Many of the children subject to the danger of traffic will continue to ride and play in the street sidewalk or not • A prominent factor in out decision to purchase our home in this neighborhood was based on the asthetic value of the street where there is more grass than concrete. We view it as an almost as a storybook -like rural community hidden away within urban surroundings. Adding more cement in the form of curbs or sidewalks diminishes that value and, we think, property value. • A sidewalk will reduce the green and soft area of the yard where our children play, run, and fall: • A sidewalk requires unwelcome maintenance. • Will result in an undesired financial obligation. In summary, we review the sidewalk as an ineffective solution that brings an unwelcome intrusion into our yards, neighborhood appearance, property value, maintenance obligations, and pocketbooks. It is also worth mentioning that the petition you received was collected at a block party where many of the neighbors were meeting for the first time and may have felt pressure to fit in or go along with the crowd and may not have taken the time to understand what they were signing. I would venture a guess that if a properly designed mail survey was conducted, the result may have differed. If you'd like help developing such a survey, I offer my time. If the tide appears to be moving in favor of the proposal, I may take the initiative to gather signatures counter to the proposal. And finally, to add further context, we have good relationships with and are very positively disposed toward our neighbors. We should take every measure possible to preserve those relationships by handling this matter in the most professional, unemotional, fact -based approach possible. Thank you for supporting our community and for considering our perspective. Sincerely, Patrick Hager 5512 Doncaster Way Edina, MN 55436 (952) 920 -1662 patrickhager @mn.rr.com November 2, 2003 Mr. Wayne D. Houle 4801 W. 50' Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Houle, We are writing to you today to voice our strong objection to the proposed sidewalk in the Doncaster Way neighborhood. We feel it is unnecessary for the following reasons. 1. Most children in the neighbortiood can walk to school by crossing no more than two to three neighbors' yards. This is the method that children have been using to get to school since the school was built in the mid 1950's. In fact, our own children have been safely doing this for the last 6 years. 2. Occasionally, Highlands Elementary as well as the IGds Club child care program, will plan a field trip to Highlands Park at the comer of Doncaster Way and Ayrshire Blvd. When this happens, the children walk to the park. I feel confident that if the school felt it was unsafe to walk down Doncaster Way, they would bus the children. This is especially significant since the school is responsible for our children's safety during these field trips. 3 Mirror Lakes Drive sees much more traffic than Doncaster Way because it connects Vernon Ave. to Interlachen Blvd. There are also many families with children living there, yet there are no sidewalks on that street. 4. Ayrshire Blvd. is another street with a lot of traffic, but the .only sidewalk is the area next to Highlands Park S. The area around Highlands Park sees much more traffic due to football games, soccer games, hockey games and baseball / softball games, yet there are no sidewalks on Glenngany or Doncaster, immediately adjacent to the park. 6. Another busy street in the neighborhood is Interlachen Blvd., yet there are no sidewalks. We know families who live off of Interlachen and yet their children will occasionally walk to school through back yards and parkland instead of riding the bus. This is yet another example of children who can safely get to school without walking on busy streets. In dosing, we would just like to say that we live in a friendly neighborhood where people watch out for others. We also love where we Ilve because we are dose to Minneapolis, yet it doesn't feel like we Ilve in a big city. Sidewalks would only add to the "big city" type of atmosphere that we would like to stay away from. We feel that a sidewalk is an unnecessary and unwanted expense. If we can live without sidewalks on some of our busiest streets as we indicated above, then we should be able to do it on Doncaster Way as well.. Sincerely, Matt and Patti Hankes CC: Edina City Council Cr 0 11 SOUTH, - DR _J I AYRSHIRE, - BLVD O DUNDEE RD O Lu 0 j EDEN PRAIRIE RD VERNON AVE Location Map Doncaster Sidewalk Project z D 0 �s 50Feet City of Edina Engineering Department October 29, 2004 City of Edina November 1, 2004 Doncaster Way Area Residents Edina, Minnesota RE: Resident Letter No. 2 Informational Meeting Announcement Doncaster Way Sidewalk Project from Vernon Ave/Tracy Ave to Highlands School Entrance City of Edina, Improvement No. S -092 Dear Resident: The City of Edina has received a petition for the referenced project. The City Council has ordered staff to provide a feasibility study for this project. See attached location map. We are hosting an Informational Meeting regarding this project to be held on Tuesday, November 9t', from 8:00 to 9:00 p.m., in the Edina City Council Chambers located at 4801 W. 50�' Street. (The Council Chambers is immediately to your left as you enter City Hall.) The meeting format will consist of a short presentation followed by an informal question and answer session. The presentation will cover scope of work and average assessment costs. If you are unable to attend, information regarding this project will available after this meeting. Sincerely, cule d �l 1� .*4 102 1 Z Lillehaug Traffic Engineer / Assistant En Lli C�i4 >�► 1 _ .(14A G 1� r.1® ltloeft City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 o et WWW.cityc Am sc lia o 1 7JG -7L/ -VVV FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 %�j — From: TCOATS @mn.rr.com Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 10:49 AM To: whoule @ci.edina.mn.us Subject: RE sidewalk petition would like to go on record as being very opposed to having sidewalks put in on Merritt Circle. This email is in response to 'he letter sent on 10/17/03 to residents in the Doncaster Way area. Thankyou Tim Coats 5524 Merritt Circle Wayne Houle rom: Wayne glaus [wgiaus @earthlink.net] Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 9:24 PM To: Wayne Houle Subject: Sidewalk Project Mr Houle, I am writing to object to the proposed sidewalk project in my neighborhood. Having lived in the neighborhood for 9 years, I do not believe that a sidewalk is the right solution to the perceived problem. I believe the perceived problem could be solved by alternative methods such'as stop sign at the entrance of Highlands school, or better enforcement of the speed limit on Doncaster Way. Likewise, I do not believe children wou if present, or that the intrusion on th homeowners is justified by the concerns neighborhood. I look forward to and discussion of alternatives. Best Regards Wayne Glaus rj�(j5 �L3Y1�45� =•�'� ld consistently use a sidewalk, e property of the affected of a minority of the the public debate on this issue From: TCOATS @mn.rr.com Sent: Sunday, November 09, 2003 10:49 AM To: whoule @ci.edina.mn.us Subject: RE sidewalk petition I would like to go on record as being very opposed to having sidewalks put in on Merritt Circle. This email is in response to Ph letter sent on 10/17/03 to residents in the Doncaster Way area. Thankyou Tim Coats 5524 Merritt Circle From: Barbara Felker [brunohunt @sprynet.com] Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2003 11:18 AM To: whoule @ci.edina.mn.us F ' ;ect: Doncaster Way sidewalks We received your letter number one regarding the sidewalks proposed for the Highlands area. Your letter says that a petition was submitted to the city council. I would like to know where the petitioners live. Do they live in the area for which they are petitioning a sidewalk? The neighbors to whom I have spoken did not know anything about the sidewalk. I know that I was never contacted and found out about the sidewalk accidentally while attending an open house at the school. I am not sure where the proposed sidewalk is to be. I do know that I personally do not wish to see our rural peaceful neighborhood turned into a type of community with sidewalks and streetlights every 100 feet. When the streets were replaced in this area, the curb and gutter option was turned down as the residents felt that if this option was selected, sidewalks would follow. At this time I feel that the city is wasting time and money on a project that the residents of the neighborhood do not want. I also feel that the most dangerous part of any child walking to Highland School is the trip through the parking lot. The vehicles entering and leaving the area travel at excessive speeds and tend to ignore all traffic and parking signs. Even if the sidewalks are not put on all the streets in our area,. they will still impact the whole area, creating more traffic and resulting in more litter left behind. Thank you for your time. Arthur J. Felker 5500 Merritt Circle Edina, MN 55436 952 -929 -2813 - -- Barbara Felker - -- brunohun :sprxnet ccm - -- EarthLink: The #1 provider of the Real Internet. February 2, 2005 Wayne D. Houle, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Edina 4801 W. 50'b St. Edina, MN 55424 ;Dear Mr. Houle, Dr. Robert 1 1 �� Ms Men Jc 5261 LochL, Edina, MN 55436 -2023 The Site Council of Highlands Elementary School appreciates the opportunity to comment on the issues of pedestrian safety and sidewalks in the vicinity of the school. The Site Council is a representative body of parents and school staff that meets periodically to address issues of interest for the Highlands School community. Student safety is one of our primary concerns, and we believe that the current safety situation for students walking to and from school needs improvement. Some background perspective may be helpful: • Currently, there are no sidewalks leading to Highlands School, so students must walk on the street to get to school. Students walking to school approach from all directions. During fair - weather months, they may walk on lawns, but this is not an option when snow piles line the streets. • Doncaster Way is very narrow —at one point, it is only 26 feet wide. This does not provide enough room for pedestrians (students) and two lanes of traffic to safely pass each other. The proximity of pedestrians to vehicular traffic makes it very difficult for bus drivers to see children walking along the road. According to the Transportation Research Board, each year approximately 500 pedestrian children are injured and 15 are killed when they are struck by school buses. A major factor in these accidents is the proximity of pedestrians to traffic and poor visibility for the bus drivers. • Traffic speeds on Doncaster Way are; at times, excessive, due in part to the hill on Doncaster. • School staff using public transportation must walk on the street from Vernon Avenue to the school. • During the peak traffic times at the beginning and end of the school day, vehicle traffic backs up on Doncaster and in the school access road; at the same time, student pedestrian traffic is at its heaviest. • In addition to students traveling to and from school, groups of students walk on Doncaster from the school to Highlands Park for activities. Kids Club participants walk from school to the Public Library weekly during the summer. • Because walking to school is perceived as dangerous, several parents drive their children to school, increasing the traffic burden on Doncaster and at the school. These children live close enough to walk if there were a safe route for them to travel. The Site Council would like to promote waWng and biking to school to promote healthier, active lifestyles. A safe, off -road sidewalk for our students would further promote our goals of health and safety. Based upon these factors, and founded in our concern for student safety, the Highlands Site Council endorses the placement of a sidewalk on the east side of Doncaster Way from Vernon Avenue to Ayrshire Boulevard Thank you for your interest, and for encouraging our input Sincerely, Highlands Elementary School Site Council City Of Edina October 17, 2003 Mr. Robert E. Westlund 5421 Doncaster Way Edina, MN 55436 RE: Doncaster Way Proposed Sidewalk Dear Mr.Westlund: The Edina City Council requested staff to respond to your letter dated September 29. The Engineering Department is currently exploring the option of placing a sidewalk along Doncaster Way. This study is a result of a petition submitted to the Edina City Council. Attached you will find a resident update letter explaining the process for a sidewalk petition. I will keep your letter on file and include it with our feasibility study: As you will see in the Resident Update Letter there will be more opportunity for input as the study progresses. As of this time no sidewalk project has been ordered by the City Council. If you have . any questions or need additional information please contact me at 952- 826 -0443 or at whoule(a�ci.edina.mn.us. Sincerely, G(/��0 Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer Enclosures C: Edina City Council (952) 927 -886" City Hall FAX (952) 826 -039, 4801 WEST 50TH STREET TDD (952) 826 -037 City of Edna October 17, 2003 Doncaster Way Area Residents RE: Resident Update Letter No. 1 Sidewalk Petition Dear Residents: Last spring a petition for sidewalks was submitted to the Edina City Council. The City Council typically refers these petitions to the Engineering Department for further study. , All proposed sidewalks must be "petitioned fog" by City of Edina Residents. Process for petitioning is the following: 1. Submit Signed Petition to City Clerk, Clerk forwards to City Council , 2. Council refers petition to Engineering Department for Feasibility Study 3. Engineering Department surveys area and prepares costs. 4. Neighborhood Information Meeting is held. 5. Engineering Department completes Feasibility Study. 6. Public Hearing is held - residents notified per State Law. 7. City Council hears proposed project and decides on issue - residents can speak publicly (on record) regarding project. 8. If City Council orders project: ® Construction documents drafted and publicly bid Council Awards Bid ® Construction starts 9. Final Assessment Hearing is held after project completion. Typical process from start to finish is approximately one to two years. We are currently at step three. As many of you have noticed, City surveyors and traffic safety people were in the neighborhood recently gathering data for the study. We anticipate the study to be completed by the end of the year and will be conducting informational meetings this winter with a public hearing during late winter. Input from residents is very important. You will have many opportunities for input such as at the neighborhood meeting, writing or emailing myself (whoule(aci.edina.mn.us), and also at the public hearing. Sincerely, G��� Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer C:, Edina City Council (952) 927 -8861 City Hall FAX (952) 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET TDD (952) 826 -0379 mwA KAINNFGr)TA SS424 -1394 February 2, 2005 Wayne D. Houle, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Houle, The Site Council of Highlands Elementary School appreciates the opportunity to comment on the issues of pedestrian safety and sidewalks in the vicinity of the school. The Site Council is a representative body of parents and school staff that meets periodically to address issues of interest for the Highlands School community. Student safety is one of our primary concerns, and we believe that the current safety situation for students walking to and from school needs improvement. Some background perspective may be helpful: Currently, there are no sidewalks leading to Highlands School, so students must walk on the street to get to school. Students walking to school approach from all directions. During fair - weather months, they may walk on lawns, but this is not an option when snow piles line the streets. Doncaster Way is very narrow —at one point, it is only 26 feet wide. This does not provide enough room for pedestrians (students) and two lanes of traffic to safely pass each other. The proximity of pedestrians to vehicular traffic makes it very difficult for bus drivers to see children walking along the road. According to the Transportation Research Board, each year approximately 500 pedestrian children are injured and 15 are killed when they are struck by school buses. A major factor in these accidents is the proximity of pedestrians to traffic and poor visibility for the bus drivers. • Traffic speeds on Doncaster Way are, at times, excessive, due in part to the hill on Doncaster. • School staff using public transportation must walk on the street from Vernon Avenue to the school. • During the peak traffic times at the beginning and end of the school day, vehicle traffic backs up on Doncaster and in the school access road; at the same time, student pedestrian traffic is at its heaviest. • In addition to students traveling to and from school, groups of students walk on Doncaster from the school to Highlands Park for activities. Kids Club participants walk from school to the Public Library weekly during the summer. • Because walking to school is perceived as dangerous, several parents drive their children to school, increasing the traffic burden on Doncaster and at the school. These children live close enough to walk if there were a safe route for them to travel. The Site Council would like to promote walking and biking to school to promote healthier, active lifestyles. A safe, off -road sidewalk for our students would further promote our goals of health and safety. Based upon these factors, and founded in our concern for student safety, the Highlands Site Council endorses the placement of a sidewalk on the east side of Doncaster Way from Vernon Avenue to Ayrshire Boulevard Thank you for your interest, and for encouraging our input. Sincerely, Highlands Elementary School Site Council May 14, 2005 Mr. Wayne D. Houle Director of Public Works / City Engineer City of Edina 4801 W. 501h Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Houle, A letter was received from Mr. Steve Lillehaug, dated November 1, 2004 inviting the residents of the Doncaster Way Area to an informational meeting, scheduled for November 9, 2004 on a proposed sidewalk project. The map on the back of that letter clearly showed the proposed sidewalk running along Doncaster Way from Vernon Ave. to the Highlands Elementary School entrance. (See attached map.) During that informational meeting, one of the residents asked why the sidewalk didn't go all the way down to Ayrshire Blvd. The response given to us at that time was that the traffic study the city conducted indicated that a sidewalk from Ayrshire to the school was not warranted. It has recently come to our attention that the City Engineering department is putting together another proposal that DOES include the stretch of Doncaster Way from the school to Ayrshire Blvd. What many of us find disturbing is that the residents most directly impacted by this proposal had to learn about it by coincidence. There has been no formal communication from the Highlands Site Council, the School District or the City. For example, the Highlands Site Council reported in their minutes of November 11, 2004 in regard to extending the sidewalk down to the park " The neighborhood is aware of these discussions..." In fact, the neighborhood was not aware of these discussions until April Of 2005 when one of us happened to be talking to you about an unrelated matter. When others speak of this proposal it sounds as if it's a "done deal ": We quote from the site council meeting minutes dated February 10th 2005. "The letter that the site council signed was sent to the PTA meeting for their support. Ellen felt that the City Council will most likely approve the side walk proposal for Doncaster Way from Vernon to Ayrshire Blvd." There is an understandable amount of frustration among many of us. Given the lack of communication and engagement it feels like our interests are not being respected in this matter. March 30, 2005 Mr. James Willemsen Edina Public Schools 5701 Normandale Rd., Room 200 Edina, Minnesota 55424 jN 9_1 city of Edina RE: Doncaster Way Sidewalk Project from Vernon Ave/Tracy Ave to Ayrshire Blvd City of Edina, Improvement No. S -092 Dear Mr. Willemsen: The City of Edina is currently evaluating constructing a sidewalk along the east side of Doncaster Way from Vernon Avenue/Tracy Avenue to Ayrshire Boulevard. To proceed with this project, we are requesting that the Edina Public School formally considers and indicates support for this project. The following is a summary of the project's history and issues discussed to date: • Project initiated by residents through petition in January 2003. • Information letter sent to residents on October 17, 2003. Several "objections" and "non- supporting" letters received by several residents of the neighborhood (2003). Informational Meeting held on November 9, 2004 for neighborhood the City from residents. Safety concern for pedestrians identified. Sidewalk in this area falls within "School Walking Zone" — qualifies for 25% funding from school to construct sidewalk. Sidewalk constructed along Vernon Avenue (if constructed in the area between the roadways of Doncaster Way and Vernon Avenue) would qualify for 100% funding from the State Gas Tax. Sidewalk south of Highlands School Entrance qualifies for additional 25% funding from City (based on volume of traffic on roadway, greater than 750 vehicles per day). Balance of cost of sidewalk would be assessed to neighborhood residents. Additional maintenance with sidewalks — City would maintain this portion of 'dewalk si Resident concerns with school drop- off /pick -up traffic and potential of re- routing this traffic. 952 - 927 -8861 City Hall FAX 952 -826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 -826 -0379 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 James Willemsen Letter Page 2 of 2 March 30, 2005 Prior to proceeding with preparing and presenting a feasibility study for this project to the City Council for consideration, it was discussed at the information meeting that further citizen and school support is needed. Involving the Highlands Elementary School's Site Council and jointly developing a sidewalk plan for the area is necessary to ensure all needs are met and properly addressed. Since, the Site Council has considered the referenced sidewalk and endorsed the project as indicated in the attached letter dated February 2, 2005. The project costs are based on a preliminary estimate as follows: To proceed with this project, the City is requesting support and approval from Edina Public Schools based on the referenced cost summary (actual costs will be based on final construction costs). Please contact me at 952 - 826 -0445 or e-mail al slillehauQ(o_ci.edina.mn.us. with any further questions or comments. Sincerely, 5�f- Steven L. Lillehaug, P.E., P.T.O.E Edina Traffic Engineer / Assistant Engineer c:a4WcutCEdina David Wilde, Highlands Elementary School Site Council Ellen Jones, Highlands Elementary School Site Council Peter Hodne, Highlands Elementary School d, sv C`O east cw.� �� a�E, S . Pt�c�•c� 7S� cal _p� � 1 Fundina Source Sidewalk Length ft Project Cost $ �r � .ry- Citv dina.Public Scho Assessed Residents State Aid North of School Entrance 775 $ 41,850 2 0, 9 Z5, $ 20,925 South of School Entrance 500 $ 27,000 $V 6,750 $ 6,750 $ 13,500 Along Vernon Avenue 300 $ 12,500 1 1 $ 12,500 Total 1575 $ 81,350 1 $ 6,750 1 $ 27,675 $ 34,425 $ 12,500 To proceed with this project, the City is requesting support and approval from Edina Public Schools based on the referenced cost summary (actual costs will be based on final construction costs). Please contact me at 952 - 826 -0445 or e-mail al slillehauQ(o_ci.edina.mn.us. with any further questions or comments. Sincerely, 5�f- Steven L. Lillehaug, P.E., P.T.O.E Edina Traffic Engineer / Assistant Engineer c:a4WcutCEdina David Wilde, Highlands Elementary School Site Council Ellen Jones, Highlands Elementary School Site Council Peter Hodne, Highlands Elementary School d, sv C`O east cw.� �� a�E, S . Pt�c�•c� 7S� cal _p� � 1 (pur strong preference is that the proposed side -walk from the school to Ayrshire be permanently shelved. At the very least we feel that another neighborhood informational meeting should be held before any action is taken by any other organization in regard to this situation. At this meeting we would like the city to explain to the neighborhood residents what changes took place between November 9th and the present that make this new proposal necessary. We also formally request copies of all correspondence between the City, the Site Council and the School District in regard to this issue. In addition, we are presenting an alternative solution for the Site Council, School District and the City to seriously consider. At the present time, there are several buses that drive past the corner of Doncaster and Ayrshire Blvd. transporting children to and from Highlands Elementary School. It would seem to us that adding one bus stop for the children who walk that stretch of Doncaster would be a reasonable and simple thing to do. The benefits of this solution are: 1. It is the most cost effective way to deal with the issue as no one would have to pay for the sidewalk and there is no extra cost to the school district. 2. The bus schedules would not have to be altered to accommodate this, as it would be the last stop before school and the first stop after school. 3. Those households with children can feel that their children are safer because they are on the bus. 4. Those households who don't want a sidewalk can feel that their wishes have also been met. We feel that this solution effectively addresses the wishes and concerns of the entire Doncaster Way neighborhood. It is our hope that this solution will resolve all open issues. In closing we would like to emphasize that our goal is complete transparency in regard to this issue -this is very reasonable and in everyone's best interests. Yours truly, l �% l / ddress S5 o f l�v r i c aAe r u Name ,J �L,�. 501 IVIWZ6�-�Ie�d Lo ! L o \ ` � Copy: Edina City Council Peter Hodne, Highlands Elementary Principle Jay Willamson, ISD 273 Ken Dragseth, ISD 273 Superintendent Highlands Elementary School Site Council SOUTH DR- AYRSHIRE- BLVD- 0 EDEN PRAIRIE DUNDEE" RD VERNON AVE Location Map Doncaster Sidewalk Project T� wF 50 M Rest City of Edina Engineering Department October 29, 2004 Page 1 of 1 Darlene Wallin From: LJDENN @aol.com Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 5:33 PM To: charlotte.abrahamson @accenture.com; nonstopfun99 @hotmail.com; dazar @mn.rr.com; hbarcelow @mn.rr.com; 5burkes @msn.com; mchristu @mn.rr.com; jdenn @FSNNORTH.COM; denn @earthlink.net; jdenn @dkyinc.com; lauriedenn @mn.rr.com; cjeichten @yahoo.com; afoley @mn.rr.com; DBFollestad @aol.com; egibbs @mn.rr.com; thehabens @hotmail.com; khoopsmn @hotmail.com; Hussianth @aol.com; Pahussian @hotmail.com; nimholte @mn.rr.com; jgroffsky @yahoo.com; lisa @loganlogic.com; BobandEJ @aol.com; skulpinski @mn.rr.com; PMarinovic @aol.com; MelodyChessie @aol.com; nataliejeff @yahoo.com; Ann.Ruschy @Prostaff.com; schwappachs @mn.rr.com; jschwappach @mn.rr.com; ssilbum2357 @msn.com; stych @srspeedy.com; ttomlinson @mn.rr.com; SJWwalkerdesign @ aol.com Subject: Fwd: Sidewalk on Doncaster Way Hello Neighbors- Just received this from Becky Danielson today. For those of you who have already seen it, song about the duplicate note. If you are in support of sidewalks on Doncaster Way an email to the address listed below would be most helpful. There is some opposition as well so they do need to hear from those of us who are in favor of the project. Thanks for your ear- Liz 5/17/2005 Page 1 of 1 Darlene Wallin From: SBDan920 @aol.com Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 5:01 PM To: LJDENN @aol.com Subject: Sidewalk on Doncaster Way Liz, Printed below is the contact information for the Edina City Council. Please send an e-mail voicing your concerns regarding a sidwalk on Doncaster Way. Also, please forward this contact information to anyone in the neighborhood who may be interested in the project. Thanks! Scott & Becky Jennifer Bennerotte Communications Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952- 826 -0390 jennerotte@ci.edina.mn.us Darlene Wallin From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 9:29 AM To: Darlene Wallin Subject: FW: SUPPORT for Doncaster Way sidewalk (city council) -- Original Message - - - -- From: Jim and Sara Silburn [mailto:ssilburn2357Qmsn.com] Sent:- Monday, May 16, 2005 9:28 AM To: Jennifer Bennerotte. cc: jsilburn @clynch.com Subject: SUPPORT for Doncaster Way sidewalk (city council) We would like to voice our support for the proposed sidewalk on Doncaster Way. Our neighborhood is facing a significant safety issue that needs to be addressed as a community. Our children need to be able to walk to and from school safely. The current situation on Doncaster does not allow for pedestrian traffic in any fashion that would be deemed safe or reasonable. It is the responsibility of a community to protect it's children. This sidewalk is both reasonable and responsible; it is good citizenship. Our neighborhood demographics have changed significantly in the past five years with houses selling to young families with young children. Additionally, traffic on Doncaster has increased as many of these families feel unsafe letting their children walk to school without a safe sidewalk for them to walk on. They are thus driving:, which only amplifies the problem of high volume traffic on a street with no way for children to traverse safely. We need to lay down issues of aesthetics and cost. People do not tend to like change, but this is not a frivolous request. I have watched cars and buses.come within inches of children walking to school (in all seasons). It is past time to address this situation and come to a reasonable decision. The welfare of our children truly is at stake. This sounds hyperbolic, but it is not. Anyone is welcome to stand in our yard and watch the school traffic any morning or afternoon. It is simply not safe. Sincerely, Jim and Sara Silburn 5508 Doncater Way Edina, MN 55436 1 Page 1 of 1 Darlene Wallin From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 8:09 AM To: Darlene Wallin Subject: FW: Sidewalk on Doncaster Way - - - -- Original Message---- - From: PMarinovic @aol.com [mailto:PMarinovic @aol.com] Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 9:26 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Fwd: Sidewalk on Doncaster Way In a message dated 5/16/05 5:32:53 PM, LJDENN writes: jbennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us Just wanted to send a note of my support of sidewalks on Doncaster Way. Patti Marinovich 5516 Merritt Circle. Edina 952 926 -5050 Darlene Wallin From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 8:21 AM To: Darlene Wallin Subject: FW: Yes to Doncaster Way sidewalks! - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Natalie Wu [mailto:nataliejeff @yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, May 16, 2005 8:08 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Yes to Doncaster Way sidewalks! To Whom It May Concern: We live in the Highlands neighborhood and are very much in favor of sidewalks on Doncaster Way. We have 3 children, 2 of whom attend Highlands Elementary School. We like to walk to school but feel very uneasy walking up Doncaster Way, especially with all the traffic going to the school at that time. It is hard to believe that there are not already sidewalks there. It is time to put them in! Thank you, Natalie Wu 5208 Chantrey Road Edina Discover Yahoo! Find restaurants, movies, travel and more fun for the weekend. Check it out! http: // discover.yahoo.com /weekend.html Page 1 of 1 From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 8:07 AM 'o: Darlene Wallin 4:c: Steve Lillehaug Subject: FW: Sidewalk on Doncaster Way - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Ann Ruschy [mailto:aruschy @mn.rr.com] Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 6:34 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Cc: 'Darren Ruschy' Subject: Sidewalk on Doncaster Way Dear Jennifer, This email is to communicate our support for the sidewalk proposed for Doncaster Way. As parents of small children, we find the addition of the sidewalk to be a critical solution to our concern for safety on this street. In addition to the high number of cars and buses that travel on Doncaster Way, the speed at which those vehicles travel is a major safety risk. The traffic is a result of both the elementary school and the park on Ayrshire. The sidewalk will be a much safer place for everyone (children and adults) to walk along Doncaster Way. Please contact my husband or myself for any questions regarding our support for the new sidewalk. Thank you! Ann and Darren Ruschy 952.848.7710 MAY -27 -2905 06:56 FROM:HUSSIAN 9529222151 TO:9528260390 P.1 Jennifer Bennerotte Communications Director, City of Edina 952- 833 -9520 FAX 952- 826 -0390 i- bennerotte -Mci:edina.mn.us Dear Jennifer or other interested parties: As a resident of Doncaster Way, the area of a proposed sidewalk, I would like to bring up a couple of important issues. Over the last year or so the issue of sidewalks has been brought forth by families of school children that walk to Edina Highlands elementary school. This is a very much divided issue between residents of Doncaster Way whose properties would be affected. I feel more communication and clarity to Doncaster residents about the proposal would be helpful. Residents received a letter in fall of 2004 with a proposal for a sidewalk only on the southeast part of the street. A meeting was held later in the year and continuing sidewalks to the lower part of Doncaster Way, south of the entrance to Highlands school, was discussed. Since this meeting, there has been no further information about the sidewalks. While there is a lot of speculation about when, if and where sidewalks would be located, I think an update on the process and progress is needed. In addition, please consider the following issues: • Who would use the sidewalks? A survey should be conducted to see how many families would actually use the sidewalks were they put in. My impression is that most families in the neighborhood drive their kids to school or take the bus. • Who would pay for the sidewalk? The sidewalks are for the benefit of the entire highlands neighborhood and school so assessments for the sidewalks should be made to address this. • Where should the sidewalks go? There is a lot of speculation about this but no one seems to know. • Because many residents are strongly against sidewalks, are there any other options that could be considered to ensure safe transport to school for pedestrians? I look forward to hearing your comments or response in the near future. Thank youl Sincerely, Anne Hussian 5408 Doncaster Way 952- 922 -5299 June 14, 2005 This letter is written in opposition to the proposed sidewalk construction along Doncaster Way leading to Edina Highlands Elementary School. The original proposal submitted was for construction of a sidewalk from the stop light at the comer of Vernon Avenue and Doncaster Way extending to the entrance to the school. There was never a proposal to extend it from the school entrance to Ayrshire Boulevard submitted to the neighborhood residents. This seems to have been added after the informational meeting on November 9, 2004. I realize that the safety of children walking along Doncaster Way is the motive behind the proposal so I'd like to address this issue first. We have lived on the comer of Doncaster Way and Merritt Circle (not by Vernon Avenue, the other end of Merritt) for nearly 35 years. During that entire time I have never heard of any safety issue or problems involving children walking to or from school. Our children attended Highlands and our granddaughter who lives with us attends now so we have been aware of the school's functions during two generations. Has there ever been an official count of the number of children who actually walk up the street from Ayrshire Boulevard to the school entrance? During the last two weeks on days when the weather has been perfect in the. mornings I have counted the children as they have gone up the hill. The first day there was a total of five children who walked passed on the side of our house. The second time I counted there were seven children, three on bicycles and four walkers. On my third day of.counting there were eight children, four on bicycles and four walkers. On a rainy day last week there were only two children who walked quickly up the street. All of the children walked or biked safely at the edge of the road as both buses and cars passed. During the winter there are often no children walking up the street and constructing a sidewalk that requires plowing would probably not change that number. Most of the cars going passed before and after school are driven by the parents of Highlands School children. We would assume that as parents they would be aware of the few walkers who are their own children's classmates and friends. Reducing the number of cars by encouraging children to be bus riders would do more for the safely of the few walkers than constructing a sidewalk would accomplish. To my knowledge there has been little done to increase bus ridership and several buses go passed with what appears to be very few children. Except during the before and after school times and when there are team sports events at Highland Park primarily in the evenings, there is very little traffic on Doncaster Way because it only runs for three blocks total. At the Vernon Avenue end of Doncaster Way there are only four houses on each side of the street south of the school entrance with very few children total. Children on the other side of Vernon Avenue are assigned to Countryside School so I do not understand the purpose in proposing the construction of a sidewalk all the way to the stoplight. To spend money on an unnecessary sidewalk whether the funds are from the school district, the city, the state or the neighborhood seems like a waste of funds needed for so many other purposes. All government agencies are currently strapped for money and trying to economize so constructing something that is not needed seems like an unnecessary expense. June 14, 2005 J This letter is written in opposition to the proposed sidewalk construction along Doncaster Way, leading to Edina Highlands Elementary School. 'The original proposal submitted was for construction of a sidewalk from the stop light at the comer of Vernon Avenue and Doncaster Way extending to the entrance to the school. There was never a proposal to extend it from the school entrance to Ayrshire Boulevard submitted to the neighborhood residents. This seems to have been added after the informational meeting on November 9, 2004. I realize that the safety of children walking along Doncaster Way is the motive behind the proposal so. I'd like to address this issue first. We have lived on the comer of Doncaster Way and Merritt Circle (not by Vernon Avenue, the other end of Merritt) for nearly 35 years., During that entire time I have never heard of any safety issue or problems. involving children walking to or from school. Our children attended Highlands and our granddaughter who lives with us attends now so we have been aware of the school's functions during two generations. Has there ever been an official count of the number of children who actually walk up the street from Ayrshire Boulevard to the school entrance? During the last two weeks on days when theweather has been perfect in the momings I have counted the children as they have gone up. the hill. The first day there was a total of five children who walked passed on the side of our house. The second time I counted there were seven children, three on bicycles and four.walkers. On my third day of counting there were eight children, four on bicycles and four walkers. On a rainy day last week there were only two children who walked quickly up the street. All of the children walked or biked, safely at the edge of the road as both buses and cars passed. During the winter there are often no children walking up the street and constructing a sidewalk that requires plowing would probably not change that number. Most of the cars going passed before and after school are driven by the parents of Highlands School children. We would assume that as parents they would be aware of the few walkers who are their own children's classmates and friends. Reducing the number of cars by encouraging children to be bus riders would do more for the safely of the few walkers than constructing a sidewalk would accomplish. To my knowledge there has been little done to increase bus ridership and several buses go passed with what appears to be very few children. Except during the before and after school times and when there are team sports events at Highland Park primarily in the evenings, there is very little traffic on Doncaster Way because it only runs for three blocks total. At the Vernon Avenue end of Doncaster Way there are only four houses on each side of the street south of the school entrance with very few children total. Children on the other side of Vernon Avenue are assigned to Countryside School so I do not understand the purpose in proposing the construction of a sidewalk all the way to the stoplight. To spend money on an unnecessary sidewalk whether the funds are from the school district, the city, the state or the neighborhood seems like a waste of funds needed for so many other purposes. All government agencies are currently strapped for money and trying to economize so constructing something that is not needed seems like an unnecessary expense. There is a great deal of neighborhood opposition to the whole concept of a sidewalk and one petition has been submitted with signatures representing this opposition from nine of the ten families who live between Ayrshire Boulevard and the school entrance. It is my understanding that there is also not much support from those who live between Vernon Avenue and the school entrance or from surrounding Highlands area streets. A majority of those who have been involved in forwarding this proposal do not reside within the Highlands neighborhood and therefore are not as directly affected. In actuality there is probably much more traffic on Mirror Lakes Drive than there is on Doncaster Way, but I have never heard of a proposal to construct a sidewalk there nor is there a need for one. The Edina Highlands neighborhood has a neat, family - oriented look to it with green lawns continuing to the roadways. There are several trees on private property that might require removal or pruning because of overhanging branches. Is the homeowner responsible for this added expense? If the plan includes a boulevard then who is responsible for its maintenance? Because of the sloping of several lawns would there also have to be retaining walls built along the edges of the sidewalk? Would the resident's proportion of the cost be distributed within the entire Highlands School area not just to the affected neighborhood? We who reside here whether for a long time or as recent additions to the neighborhood would like to maintain the current appearance and feel that the addition of a sidewalk on one street only would not increase the safely of the children of the neighborhood, would deter from the look and the monetary value of our homes and be an unnecessary expense to the city, the school district, the state and the residents of the whole neighborhood. Most residents of the area would like to see this proposal defeated at its next reading. Thank you for your attention to this request. Sincerely, 12a, -a-,, C) From: Steve Lillehaug Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 3:56 PM To: 'Kdmj2 @aol.com' Cc: Steve Lillehaug Subject: RE: Resident Letter #3 Doncaster Way Sidewalk Project Good afternoon Ms. Cranny. Most of the information you are requesting is not know fully know at this time as we have not completed the feasibility study. The letter you are referring to can be found on the City's website as follows: http�//www.cityofedina.com/Pages/L5 ConstructionProiects S092.htm We will be providing this information to you as we progress with this project. Thanks. STEVE Steven L. Lillehaug, PE, PTOE Assistant City Engineer/Traffic Engineer 952 - 826 -0445 slillehaug @ci.edina.mn.us City of Edina Engineering Department 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com (fax) 952- 826 -0389 - - - -- Original Message - - - -- [Steve Lillehaug] From: Kdmj2 @aol.com [mailto:Kdmj2 @aol.com] Sent: Monday, June 27, 2005 3:31 PM To: Steve Lillehaug Subject: Resident Letter #3 Doncaster Way Sidewalk Project Mr. Lillehaug: I am in receipt of a letter dated June 2, 2005 regarding the above referenced project. In the summary of the history and issues regarding the proposed project, it is stated that an informational letter was sent to the residents on October 17, 2003. Can you please forward a copy of the letter to me? We purchased our current property in the Highlands neighborhood in April 2004 and were not aware of the project. Perhaps the letter explains the assessment to the neighbors, if it does not, however, please forward the estimated cost of the project for each household in the neighborhood, the estimate construction time involved and how construction may interfere with traffic in and out of Merit Circle. Also, please forward any other pertinent information. Thank you. Sincerely, Donna Cranny To: George Watson Subject: RE: Doncaster Way George: K you for the email. You -are correct that the streets within your neighborhood will be seal coated. This will occur, depending on weather, next week. The Doncaster Sidewalk project is not going away. Due to our summer work load the Doncaster Sidewalk has been put on the back burner. We anticipate relooking at this issue by mid - August with info meeting in September. Stay tuned for more mailings, etc. I would recommend that the neighbors, both for and against, hold all correspondence until this goes to the Council. Please contact me with any other questions you may have. Thanks Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Direct 952 - 826 -0443 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 whoule @ci_edina.mn.us www-. ty fedina.com From: George Watson [mailto:george @brauer- Itd.com] ,ant: Thursday, July 14, 2005 10:04 AM .): Wayne Houle Subject: Doncaster Way Wayne, I have to questions that I hope you can help me with this morning. First, I see a growing pile of seal coat aggregate in the parking lot for Highlands Park. Are the streets going to be sealcoated in our neighborhood? If so what's the likely schedule? Second, what is the status on the sidewalk request made by several neighbors on Doncaster Way? The impression that I and several other people have is that the process has stalled and that the staff is hoping that it will go away. Me too, but is that the fact? Sincerely, George Watson, President Brauer & Associates, Ltd. 10417 Excelsior Boulevard Suite Number One Hopkins, MN 55343 Phone: (952) 238.0831 Fax: (952) 238.0833 Email: george@brauer- ltd.com Website: www.brauer- ltd.com July 19, 2005 Steven Lillehaug Assistant City Engineer/Traffic Engineer City of Edina 4801 W. 50`h St Edina, MN 55424 -1394 RE: Doncaster Sidewalk Project Dear Mr. Lillehaug: Thank you for keeping us up to date on the above project and allowing us to share our opinion with you. We are opposed to the sidewalk project currently being discussed between City Hall and a group of Highland School neighbors. Primarily, our opposition is to the project itself, at any cost. Opposition to the expense is secondary. There are a number of reasons for our opposition. One is our aesthetic appreciation for the neighborhood. Sidewalks present a more urban look which is not as appealing to us. Secondly, we are also concerned that if constructed on Doncaster, a precedent will be set for further sidewalk expansion throughout our neighborhood. Last, from an environmental point of view, we favor minimizing unnecessary surface paving. We are concerned about safety, too, and understand about parental concerns. However, we feel safety is no more compromised today than in the past and do not see the justification for a sidewalk. Children have been accessing the school since the neighborhood was developed and we do not see that the situation has recently changed to place additional children in harm's way. Does the benefit of this sidewalk outweigh its expense? How many Highland students actually come from our own neighborhood and walk to school? Most take a bus. Many Highland students come from outside our neighborhood and would not use a sidewalk. What would be the cost to construct & maintain this project per student using this sidewalk? Does this expense to our neighborhood & the taxpayer justify the cost for these few? These are some of the questions on our mind. Your letter indicates some special funding for this project. Residents should keep in mind that special assessments to pay for this project would be in addition to the funding sources we pay for through other tax collection sources (school district, the city, and state gas fund). The cost burden will fall primarily on the homeowner. Additionally, once constructed, maintenance expenses will be paid by us as either taxpayers and /or property owners (special assessments.) We just don't see the need to construct the sidewalk at this time nor the justification for its expense. And we certainly don't have the desire, from an aesthetic point of view. Thanks again for allowing us to participate in this conversation. Sincerely, Sally & Ch C' Olson 5 5 28 Glengarry Pkwy Edina, MN 55436 Steve Lillehaug From: Phyllis Carlson [PTCARLSON @MN.RR.COM] Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 5:21 PM To: Steve Lillehaug Subject: Sidewalk Proposal Doncaster One extra comment: I sent the questionnaire back saying I did not approve of this expense but I want to add one more item. Even though my children walked to school or went a block further away to catch the school bus, I have observed that current students living on Chantrey Road have the Edina School Bus stop right in front of their houses to pick them up, so none of them would have need of a sidewalk or would benefit from said sidewalk. Phyllis Carlson 5528 Chantrey Road 092806 gordon hughes Doncaster sidewalk.txt From: Gordon Hughes sent: Thursday September 28, 2006 9:00 AM To: alihul @aol.com Cc: Wayne Houle; alihul @aol.com; ann Swenson; aim Hovland; Linda Masica; scot Housh subject: Doncaster sidewalk Good morning Alice. since we seem to be missing each other, I thought I'd respond. via e-mail to your Doncaster sidewalk questions. The city received a sidewalk petition quite a while ago from residents on Doncaster between Ayshire and Vernon. (Although one signer was from chantrey Road.) The council accepted the petition and referred it to Engineering for the preparation of a feasibility report. (This is the step before ordering a public hearing.) Engineering did a survey of the block and found that seven residents were in favor and seven opposed the sidewalk. This sidewalk is in the walking zone of Highlands school. According to City policy, the city will fund 25% of the cost of such sidewalks and the school District is asked to also fund 25% as a way of encouraging sidewalks in such areas. (The City also assumes part of the cost of sidewalks close to commercial areas for the same reason.) According to Wayne, the school District, or at least the site council, has agreed to contribute its 25 %. In past cases, the city has assessed school zone sidewalks on all properties within the walking distance of the school. (Cornelia school and countryside school are a good examples of this.) so, the City conducted a second survey of all homes within the walking distance. Within this larger area, 64 respondents were in favor, 69 were opposed and 60 did not respond. Wayne's next step is to conduct an open house for the entire area. This is tentatively planned for November. At the open house, a sidewalk layout will be shown and questions answered. Following this, Wayne will complete his feasibility report to the Council and the Council will decide on whether to schedule a public hearing for the sidewalk or scrap the project. As you know, the Council recently decided not to proceed with a similar hearing in the Creston Hills neighborhood due to poor neighborhood support. In some other past cases though, such as Maple Road and the aforementioned school, the council decided to proceed with hearings and later ordered the improvements even though some were opposed. Hope this puts this project in perspective. Let me know if you need more info. (I will copy the rest of the Council on this as others may be getting similar questions.) Page 1 From: Gordon Hughes Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 9:01 AM ' To: 'Joni or Pat Bennett' Cc: Wayne Houle Subject: RE: Requests for information from Wayne Houle Thanks Joni. Wayne will provide information on the Doncaster sidewalk issue and the Interlachen crossings question. The following is an excerpt from an e -mail I sent to someone a couple of months ago on the Doncaster issue.: "The City received a sidewalk petition quite a while ago from residents on Doncaster between Ayshire and Vernon. (Although one signer was from Chantrey Road.) The Council accepted the petition and referred it to Engineering for the preparation of a feasibility report. (This is the step before ordering a public hearing.) Engineering did a survey of the block and found that seven residents were in favor and seven opposed the sidewalk. This sidewalk is in the walking zone of Highlands School. According to City policy, the City will fund 25% of the cost of such sidewalks and the School District is asked to also fund 25% as a way of encouraging sidewalks in such areas. (The City also assumes part of the cost of sidewalks close to commercial areas for the same reason.) According to Wayne, the School District, or at least the site council, has agreed to contribute its 25 %. In past cases, the City has assessed school zone sidewalks on all properties . within the walking distance of the school. (Cornelia School and Countryside School are a good examples of this) So,.the City conducted a second survey of all homes within the walking distance. Within this larger area, 64 respondents were in favor, 69 were opposed and 60 did not respond." The next step on this project is to bring the matter to a hearing before the Council. As you can see from the surveys, not a strong consensus in the neighborhood. As to the street utility, there as not been a lot of Council discussion on that topic other than a stated desire for the legislature to authorize such a funding vehicle. It is not now permitted under State law. The 2005 legislative session held hearings on the topic but the bill was strongly opposed by some interests (like the gas station lobby) who thought they were going to pay more than their share. If it is ever authorized, the Council would have to decide if it would impose it as a means of spreading a portion of street reconstruction costs to the broader community. If so, it would probably be done on an "REU" basis in order to recognize the different trip generation impacts of specific land uses. Let me know if we can provide more info. Again, Wayne will get you.more specifics on the Doncaster sidewalk. From: Joni or Pat Bennett [ mailto :jonibennettl2@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 3:25 PM To: Gordon Hughes Subject: Requests for information from Wayne Houle Hello Gordon, I have some requests for information from Wayne Houle. Only one of them, for information relating to a request for sidewalks in the Highlands neighborhood on Doncaster Way, is time - sensitive. I would appreciate receiving all information relevant to that issue as soon as possible: If there is information regarding sidewalks in any other part of the Highlands neighborhood, I would appreciate that also. I also would appreciate information regarding any plan for or discussion of sidewalks /crosswalks connecting the north side of Interlachen Boulevard to the south side. Residents have spoken with me regarding their need and desire for connections at Mirror Lakes Drive and from the Todd Park neighborhood to the library, Jerry's, etc. Finally, I would appreciate receiving information concerning a citywide street utility and previous Council consideration and discussion of that issue. Thank you! Joni Bennett jonib_ennettl 2 @comcast.net 952 - 927 -0661 TO C�- I April 2, 2007 Mayor Jim Hovland Edina City Council 4801 West 506 St Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members: I am a resident of Doncaster way, site of the proposed sidewalk to Highlands Elementary School. The issue of a sidewalk leading to Highlands Elementary School has been on the table since I have been a resident of Edina for the past 9 years. I have sent 3 children as pedestrians to attend Edina Highlands Elementary School. My youngest son is currently 8 years old and walks to school every day. In the past, I was a strong proponent of the sidewalk issue but now have mixed feelings about the construction of a sidewalk. I would like to point out the following issues that should be addressed before decisions on the sidewalk are made: 1. Location of the sidewalk. A "feasibility study" determined that the sidewalk should be located on the west side of Doncaster Way from Ayshire to the entrance to the school, then the sidewalk would "switch" to the east side of the school stretching to Vernon. I think this is flawed. This means that children will have to cross over to the east side of the block in the middle of the busiest intersection, where buses and cars enter the school. This is the funnel and most dangerous area involving safety issues for pedestrians. 2. Who will use the sidewalk ?? Right now, there are very few children from the west side of the neighborhood who walk to school. Many parents drive their children to school or they take the bus. Children who live on the east side of Highlands' neigborhood walk to school via another route that takes them through .a resident's yard. Will students /residents use the sidewalk or will they continue to drive their children to school as they do now? I would hate to commit enormous resources and create such division between neighbors if the sidewalk will not be used. I talked to Wayne Houle at one point about researching this issue but have not heard anything. 3. To what extent should the School Board be involved? What are the applicable statutes involving sidewalks and guidelines for sidewalks around elementary schools? I would encourage members of the City Council and other decision makers to visit the crosswalk area on Doncaster Way, in front of the school, between 8:20 -8:35 am on school mornings to observe the traffic and pedestrian issues and to clearly understand where sidewalks would benefit pedestrians. This has been an extremely divisive issue on our street and there is much animosity among neighbors about it. I hope all issues involving the sidewalk are closely examined before any final decisions are made. Since*y, Anne Hussian 5408 Doncaster Way Edina, MN 55436 952 - 922 -5299 I)ahussian@,hotma.il.com 5108 Mirror Lakes Drive Edina, MN 55436 952.922.2595 August 17, 2007 Mayor James Hovland Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor James Hovland, RE: Doncaster way Sidewalk improvements 400 yG /N 01C �N4 1 attended the meeting on August 15th regarding this project. After hearing the proposed plan and cost, I have several concerns that I would like addressed. 1. I am able to see how the children on the east side of Doncaster south of Highlands School will benefit from a sidewalk; however, I do not see how this sidewalk will benefit the children on the west side of Doncaster south of the school. I can actually see this being more dangerous if children actually try to cross Doncaster, where it can be very busy and there is NO, crossing guard, in order to gain access to the sidewalk. It seems like a side_ walk on both sides would have been a much better idea if safety of children is the main concern. I also have similar concerns with children who live on the east side of Doncaster north of the school crossing Doncaster and /or Ayrshire Blvd. to gain access to a sidewalk that will be located on the west side of the street in this location. Here again, if safety is the main concern, then a sidewalk on both sides seems like a much better idea so children would not have to cross busy roads at critical times in order to access a sidewalk. 2. The residents who live in that area and who attended that meeting stated that the number given on vehicle trips per day ( "1500" according to the Engineering Department) on that section of roadway is extremely high. Since, according to the Engineering Department, that seems to be the main determining factor in this. project, I think those numbers need to be confirmed. I also would want to know if the numbers are the same on the north side and the south side of the school. I am assuming both sections of roadway were checked independently. 3. 1 am still having a hard time understanding why we are included in the cost of this project. The only logical reason seems to be to dilute the cost so it is not prohibitive to the residents who live in that section of roadway on Doncaster. The reason given by the Engineering Department seems to be that we are located in. the `walking zone" of the school and, therefore, would benefit from the sidewalks. (As stated in the Engineering Department's handout: "A special assessment of approximately � per 190 residential equivalent unit will be levied against residents q ,located within the walking zone of Highlands Elementary School.') If this is true, then the west side of Dundee Road, the Lochloy Drive neighborhood, and '�-�°,possibly others should be included as well in the cost of this project. I would also like you to know that in the 8 years my children. attended Highlands Elementary School, my children always rode the bus. I am almost sure this bus service was provided to all of Mirror Lakes Drive, Dundee Road, and some (if not all) of Chantrey Road. I am not sure about Glengarry Parkway. For safety reasons, I would not allow any child to walk on Mirror Lakes Drive from my end of the' street considering the speed of cars on this section and the blind curves. If my children were forced to walk, I would most certainly be driving them to school. If there were a decision to put sidewalks on my street for safety reasons in regards to children on my street walking to school; who would be responsible for that cost? I am sure it would fall to the residents on my street and not to all the residents within the "walking zone" of the school. I appreciate your time in considering and addressing my concerns. Thank you! Sincerely, .Karen Hoops 5108 Mirror Lakes Drive N 5108 Mirror Lakes Drive Edina, MN 55436 952.922.2595 August 17, 2007 Scot Housh Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Scot Housh, RE: Doncaster Way Sidewalk Improvements I attended the meeting on August 15th regarding this project. After hearing the proposed plan and cost, I have several concerns that I would like addressed. 1. I am able to see how the children on the east side of Doncaster south of Highlands School will benefit from a sidewalk; however, I do not see how this sidewalk will benefit the children on the west side of Doncaster south of the school. I can actually see this being more dangerous if children actually try to cross Doncaster, where it can be very busy and there is NO crossing guard, in order to gain access to the sidewalk. It seems like a sidewalk on both . sides would have been a much better idea if safety of children is the main concern. I also have similar concerns with children who live on the east side of Doncaster north of the school crossing Doncaster and /or Ayrshire Blvd. to gain access. to a sidewalk that will be located on the west side of the street in this location. Here again, if .safety is the main concern, then a sidewalk on both sides seems like a much better idea so children would not have to cross busy roads at critical times in order to access a sidewalk. 2. The residents who live in that area and who attended that meeting stated that the number given on vehicle trips per day ( "1500" according to the Engineering Department) on that section of roadway is extremely high. Since, according to the Engineering Department, that seems to be the main determining factor in this project, I think those numbers need to be confirmed. I also would want to know if the numbers are the same on the north side and the south side of the school. I am assuming both sections of roadway were checked independently. 3. 1 am still having a hard time understanding why we are included in the cost of this project. The only logical reason seems to be to dilute the cost so it is not prohibitive to the residents who live in that section of roadway on Doncaster. The reason given by the Engineering Department seems to be that we are located in the "walking zone" of the school and, therefore, would benefit from the sidewalks. (As stated in the Engineering Department's handout: "A special assessment of approximately $190 per residential equivalent unit will be levied against residents located within the walking zone of Highlands Elementary School. ") If this is true, then the west side of Dundee Road, the Lochloy Drive neighborhood, and possibly others should be included as well in the cost of this project. I would also like you to know that in the 8 years my children attended Highlands Elementary School, my children always rode the bus. I am almost sure this bus service was provided to all of Mirror Lakes Drive, Dundee Road, and some (if not all) of Chantrey Road. I am not sure about Glengarry Parkway. For safety reasons, I would not allow any child to walk on Mirror Lakes Drive from my end of the street considering the speed of cars on this section and the blind curves. If my children were forced to walk, I would most certainly be driving them to school. If there were a decision to put sidewalks on my street for safety reasons in regards to children on my street walking to school, who would be responsible for that cost? I am sure it would fall to the residents on my street and not to all the residents within the "walking zone" of the school. I appreciate your time in considering and addressing my concerns. Thank you! Sincerely, Karen Hoops 5108 Mirror Lakes Drive PA Traffic counts Page 1 of 1 Jack Sullivan om: Marinovich, Mike @ Minneapolis [Mike.Marinovich @cbre.com] Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 11:43 AM To: Jack Sullivan Cc: Jamie Cynor; PMarinovic @aol.com; Guy Logan Subject: RE: Traffic counts Hi Jack, Thank you for the follow up. I would like to get your opinion on the numbers. It is unfortunate the count didn't take place in June or July when the Highlands fields are so heavily used. How should I best have my neighbors communicate their interest in the sidewalk? Also, I confirmed with my wife that we received nothing from the city regarding the open house. Is the total assessment $190.00 per house? I appreciate your efforts to make our streets safe for our children. Michael R. Marinovich I Senior Vice President CB Richard Ellis I Brokerage 81 South 9th Street, Suite 400 Minneapolis, MN 55402 T 612 336 4313 1 F 612 336 4320 1 C 612 715 1115 mike marinovichi,7cbre.com I www.cbre.com Please consider the environment before printing this email. This email may contain information that is confidential or attomey- client privileged and may constitute inside information. The contents of this email are intended only for the recipient(s) listed above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are directed not to read, disclose, distribute or otherwise use this transmission. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the transmission. Delivery of this message is not intended to waive any applicable privileges. From: Jack Sullivan [mailto:jsullivan @ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Friday, August 17,'2007 12:28 PM Subject: Traffic counts Gentlemen, I will be hand delivering the raw traffic count data to you this afternoon at your home address. Please contact me with any questions. I'll be out of the office the week of August 20th. In my absence contact Jamie Cynor. Thank you. Jack D. Sullivan, PE Assistant City Engineer City of Edina Direct: 952.826.0445 fax: 952.826.0389 jsullivan @ci.edina.mn.us 0 inn innn17 Pagel of 2 Jack Sullivan From: Patti Marinovich [pmarinovic @aol.com] Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 2:08 PM To: Marinovich, Mike @ Minneapolis Cc: Jack Sullivan; Jamie Cynor; Guy Logan Subject: Re: Traffic counts Several of our neighbors did not receive any notice of the meeting either Sent from my iPhone On Aug 18, 2007, at 11:42 AM, "Marinovich, Mike @ Minneapolis" <Mike.Marinovich@cbre.com> wrote: Hi Jack, Thank you for the follow up. I would like to get your opinion on the numbers. It is unfortunate the count didn't take place in June or July when the Highlands fields are so heavily used. How should I best have my neighbors communicate their interest in the sidewalk? Also, I confirmed with my wife that we received nothing from the city regarding the open house. Is the total assessment $190.00 per house? appreciate your efforts to make our streets safe for our children. Michael R. Marinovich I Senior Vice President CB Richard Ellis I Brokerage 81 South 9th Street, Suite 400 Minneapolis, MN 55402 T 612 336 4313 1 F 612 336 4320 1 C 612 715 1115 mike.marinovich(cDcbre.com I www.cbre.com Please consider the environment before printing this email. This email may contain information that is confidential or attorney - client privileged and may constitute inside information. The contents of this email are intended only for the recipient(s) listed above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are directed not to read, disclose, distribute or otherwise use this transmission. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the transmission. Delivery of this message is not intended to waive any applicable privileges. From: Jack Sullivan [mailto:jsullivan ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 12:28 PM Subject: Traffic counts Gentlemen, I will be hand delivering the raw traffic count data to you this afternoon at your home address. Please contact me with any questions. I'll be out of the office the week of August 20th. In my absence contact Jamie Cynor. Thank you. Jack D. Sullivan, PE Assistant City Engineer Page 2 of 2 City of Edina Direct: 952.826.0445 fax: 952.826.0389 0sullivan _ci.edina.mn.us 8/29/2007 -418L wm NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATIONAL MEETING DONCASTER WAY HALIFAX AVENUE SIDEWALK PROJECTS Improvement Nos. S -092 & S -100 August 15, 2007 4 C11 7 OF =DINA Input Opportunities USE POST -IT NOTES AND PLACE ON MAP :D WRITE DOWN ON COMMENT CARDS :) TELL US / PHONE US :D WRITE US/ EMAIL US C) SPEAK AT PUBLIC HEARING ii CITY OF EDINA Typical Process (continued) • Ordering of improvement project requires a majority of Council if petitioned by residents (normally 3 of 5 Council votes if >35% signatures of assessed properties) or 4 of 5 Council votes if project is not initiated by residents (or lacking 35% signatures). Levy of special assessments is typically held at the completion of the project through a Final Assessment Hearing. Agenda INTRODUCTIONS HISTORY OF PROJECTS PROJECT -PLANS -COSTS -ASSESSMENTS WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE? CITY OF EDINA Typical Process • Initiation of improvement project by Council (staff) or by petition. • Feasibility Report prepared and accepted by Council. • Ten days notice is sent to affected property owners and legal notice is placed in paper (Edina Sun) prior to the hearing. • Public hearing to order the project is then conducted. Project Area Doncaster Way e� i� ,; • f A ins'h. Project History / Initiation Doncaster Way Project initiated by residents through petition (Received January 2003) Information letter sent to residents (October 17, 2003) Several "objections" and "non- supporting" letters received from several residents of neighborhood. (2003 - 2007) in CITY OF EDINA Highlands School Walking Zone oCITY OF EOINA 4i 1.411t; I + - eve 0. City of Edina Highland, School Route Plan Map Plan view Doncaster Way I 041 CITY OF '_6;A City Sidewalk Policy � Doncaster Way • Sidewalk falls within "School Walking Zone ". • Sidewalks on streets with volumes over 750 veh /day qualify. • Sidewalk maintained by City Project Scope clTr of EoaA Doncaster Way • Construct 5 -foot wide boulevard style sidewalk along Doncaster Way from Vernon Ave /Tracy Ave to Ayrshire Boulevard Project Issues Doncaster Way • Issues /concerns we do know about: • Safety concerns for pedestrians • Not all residents are in favor of sidewalk. • High volume of school traffic on Doncaster (1500 vehicles per day) • Large tree in boulevard area along Doncaster Way (5513 Doncas,er) • Additional maintenance with sidewalks (City will maintain this portion of sidewalk) ;+ CITY OF EDINA - - Support vs. Non -su port- Doncaster Way - w i CITY OF EDINA• " -+t-• Project Area l ar T 3 - Halifax Avenue "y +'if7 �¢ f�iKf •�' I ,�t�� :•,. City Sidewalk Policy Halifax Avenue • Sidewalk falls within "Business District Walking Zone ". • Sidewalks on streets with volumes over 750 veh /day qualify. • Sidewalk is not maintained by City. �CITY oF. Project Costs Doncaster Way • Project cost: $ 93,800 • Notes: • Sidewalk along Vernon Ave will be funded using Municipal State Aid moneys (Gas Tax $$) CITY OF EDINA Project History I Initiation Halifax Avenue Project initiated by residents through petition. (Received December 2004) • Several "objections" and "non- supporting" letters received from several residents of neighborhood. (2004 & 2005) Project Scope CITY OF EDINA Halifax Avenue • Construct 4 -foot wide boulevard style sidewalk along Halifax Avenue from West 54th Street to West 51st Street. l0 10 CITr oc mINA Plan view Halifax Avenue ���� �; iirdi►.:k��.ht�EsiA� CITY OF EDINA + I Support vs. Non - support Halifax Avenue I I � , f I �l: I ..• s i CITY OF EDINA Assessment Policy Methodoloav - Neiahborhood sidewalks: • Based on residential equivalent unit (REU) • Single family home is 1 REU • School Zone assessment policy (Doncaster) •This method has been used for other sidewalk projects within Edina -School pays 25% -City pays 25% -Residents pay 50% of remaining balance F: CITY OF , EDINA Project Issues Halifax Avenue • Issues /concerns we do know about: • Safety concerns for pedestrians • Not all residents are in favor of sidewalk. • High volume of traffic on Halifax • 900 veh /day south W 52 "d St • 1150 veh /day north of W 52 ^d St • Boulevard trees and some steep slopes in boulevard area along Halifax Avenue. • Additional maintenance for homeowners jW CITY OF MINA Project Costs Halifax Avenue • Project cost: $ 127,500 -M CITY OF EDINA Assessment Policy Methodoloav - Neiahborhood sidewalks: • Business District assessment policy (Halifax) -This method has been used for other sidewalk projects within Edina -City pays 25% -Residents pay 75% of remaining balance M Ih• Proposed Assessments Doncaster Way Preliminary Estimated Assessment is not final — will be adjusted based on final construction cost. $ 190 per residential equivalent unit • 3 year assessment • Approximately 6.5 % interest on unpaid balance Proposed Assess m'ents Doncaster Way Proposed Asse Halifax Avenue - - -i i �.� ..� •il Highlands School Walking Zone i. ' Highland School Gty of Edina Hiphlanda School Noula Plan Map `may. —..�._ `.• _ — 4. Proposed Assessments Halifax Avenue • Preliminary Assessment is not final — will be adjusted based on final construction cost. • $ 1,520 per residential equivalent unit • 3 year assessment • Approximately 6.5 % interest on unpaid balance rt CITY OF EDINA Project Schedules Council Orders Public Hearing .........Aug 7, 2007 Neighborhood Informational Mtg.....Aug 15, 2007 Receive Feasibility Report ...............Aug 21, 2007 Public Hearing ..... ...........................Sept 4, 2007 If City Council orders project: Bid Opening ... .........................Winter 2007/2008 Award Contract ...................... Winter 2007/2008 Begin Construction . .........................Spring 2008 Complete Construction ..................Summer 2008 00 CITY OF EDI NA Questions • Issues /concerns we don't know about? • Please forward comments to us. ■ Let us know your issues. i Thank you for attending! i Sign -in Sheet Doncaster Way Sidewalk Open House August 15, 2007 _ 10-4 1/1 W500, _�A, 041 BUT - MA UFR M� • ' rte, i r 1 ...��I�� � t r � _ ` . . it ., o ff��_�MR i ) m VAVU� M . �_. , Sign -in Sheet Doncaster Way Sidewalk Open House August 15, 2007 Name Address No. �^ cPhone i a r bCL r Gc MprrAJ, e C152-925?- f vs e - fu o -G S g zo e IL 7s ilc sS S C/o CG S Vb ll ;1�7 2Z-.5 5201 bodQV-MP VJAJ qb7, III q4b2- 64 WY-- 55'01 Qo " 5-S'o 3 Me rr ' 'rc 2 - 9 2'7- 9 820 q52_ Ii 2D 4624 QUESTION / COMMENT CARD Name / k�k S Address vU0, l o 11 «S le P PLEASE PRINT LEASE PRINT QUESTION / COMMENT CARD glac.S2 -) 0 5 r dP�a' T1�2 rfvv -/i -f/ r �r�e v►� /i 5 of L . Iv. I'_ t s �V� ► Yl l'Vlr.� l /� (�1C1 tit �J `7� aC, i in c X P Name ' Address 25-132 dO cIV,4 Cc m ( -e PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT QUESTION / COMMENT CARD ,1_ �l� ve G�- `/ `mom 'U5 W ow- end. " rror take,!; %ve- s ind 8,t. lirA ioiPC es ci When fie LOChl nee h,f�► -hood is �, bv��on Gve Gu /l he- G�Se y� i� all -1be G2 /7evW a, /au; t,v r-a 1.i'1`Ve iA Ae �rl o0 5 Address-1:L, 5oa mirror�sD'r'� NamC PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT v � �� � u�a�rt � sez pr haV�- G►c���;� 1,� S�1Ae ee r�s�de4 4oc6A lz f - del) - A QUESTION / COMMENT CARD 7 ' �� , t L &jA Address PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT QUESTION / COMMENT CARD Name Address _ PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT QUESTION / COMMENT CARD (,'7 -141 +lln� ©-ta i- i =24..s lo Iv 0+- lot" :5j:! 0.5 T ti s w o" aLA-f-" 5 c.c,t k 'fie, eta-6— o�--� r -1&- a re, 3 w 9 k, ° s �-�+► 1 % ' p a.dAlA . Qf - .. a All +k e 5 i � M w 1'l, Name S ° �q� Address PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT d Vey ni jFSTT6M / COMMENT CARD �7kv�5ce 1 /.S S�QCtccf ,irt �s�' 5uy v e Alome- I l /zsv4 a 1 D Aolm�., —in _ / 1 / . _ , . _ z? /I/./ , 1 f el 1 (- iI M 1 1 / # - #Iw C- uvve�f � ob l �cvi c C� v �f Name nL, �n W —t s-,( Address 5o er PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT L beItev-e �s �5 a cva5 �� ��spvVCQ.S ho Gu to w c� l.�e. 4 i 4- f��-ea �1s740v Ll 5A0&05 �o !Jy T�VDY� �z 5w� A Y— SC.�GG 5 4ca PC." �'►'l Q vi /!-tom %�-Q S ciP r vu-��C �+ O .erg ro ue S: ` eCV be4l STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following date, August 17, 2007, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing for Doncaster Way Sidewalk (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 16 days prior to the date of the hearing; and that I also sent said notice to the following corporations at the indicated addresses whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of said County Auditor. NAME Independent School District No. 273 City of -Edina ADDRESS 5701 Normandale Road, Edina 55435 4801 W. 50th Street, Edina 55424 WITNESS my hand and the seal of said City this /4J_ day of • l�. August 17, 2007 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING DONCASTER WAY SIDEWALK (FROM VERNON AVEITRACY AVE TO AYRSHIRE BLVD) IMPROVEMENT S -092 City of Edina The Edina City Council will meet at Edina City Hall, on Tuesday, September 4, 2007 at 7:00 p.m., to consider the proposed improvements for the Doncaster Way Sidewalk. This hearing is being conducted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. This hearing has been called as a recommendation from staff. The proposed project would, be constructed in the summer of 2008 with the assessment hearing occurring in 2009. The estimated assessable cost is $40,635.00. The cost will be funded by special assessment. The estimated cost per assessable lot is $189.00 per residential equivalent unit. These assessments can be divided over a three -year period with interest accumulating on the unpaid balance. The area proposed to be assessed the cost of the proposed improvement includes the following: 5701 to 5816 Ayrshire Blvd; 5201 to 5536 Chantrey Road; 5201 to 5521 Doncaster Way; 5200 to 5604 Dundee Road; 5200 to 5532 Glengarry Pkwy; 5800 to 5812 Hidden Lane; 5500 to 5536 Merritt Circle; 5100 to 5541 Mirror Lakes Drive; 5700 to 5824 Northwood Drive; and 5800 to 5809 South Drive Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties which are considered to be benefited by the improvement. The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 Easy Peel Labels I Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5960TM rR jFeed Paper 2911721310006 KAREN K HOOPS DAVID E HOOPS 5108 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436 2911721310009 LAUREL BESSESEN JOHN T BESSESEN 5120 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436 2911721310012 MICHAEL B GORMAN ELIZABETH L GORMAN 5100 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436 2911721340003 MILLICENT F FENNELL FRANK C FENNELL 5804 NORTHWOOD DR EDINA MN 55436 2911721340006 RINDI ROLFING KYLE R ROLFING 5816 NORTHWOOD DR EDINA MN 55436 2911721340018 ROBIN M STRANGIS MARK E STRANGIS 5817 NORTHWOOD DR EDINA MN 55436 2911721340021 JOANN T PEDERSON JEROME B PEDERSON 5801 NORTHWOOD DR EDINA MN 55436 2911721340024 RICHARD A LEWIS ELIZABETH LEWIS 5808 HIDDEN LA EDINA MN 55436 2911721340027 WILLIAM L FITCH MARY A FITCH 5201 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436 2911721340030 KURT E LANGE 5301 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436 01 m P C� 3 Q r� L P �. miee instrumon bneez i AVERYp5960TM for Easy Peel Feature 1 V 2911721310007 2911721310008 CRAIG V ROCKWELL JAMES P DEANOVIC 5112 MIRROR LAKES DR 9465 AMESBURY LA EDINA MN 55436 EDEN PRAIRIE MN 55347 2911721310010 2911721310011 JOYCE J HEIKENEN SCOTT R BADE 5124 MIRROR LAKES DR ANDREA J FLOM EDINA MN 55436 5128 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436 2911721310013 2911721340002 JON T TREMMEL TYRON K ESTLICK DONNA Z TREMMEL MARY ESTLICK 5104 MIRROR LAKES DR 5132 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 2911721340004 2911721340005 BRADLEY C GEER CHARLES A GEER 5808 NORTHWOOD OR BARBARA N GEER EDINA MN 55436 5812 NORTHWOOD DR EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 2911721340007 2911721340008 WILLIAM R SKALLERUD TRACY C TOMLINSON LORI M SKALLERUD KEITH W TOMLINSON 5820 NORTHWOOD DR 5824 NORTHWOOD DR EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 2911721340019 2911721340020 SHERI K GUIMONT WILMA PARROTT ROBERT N GUIMONT JOHN PARROTT 5813 NORTHWOOD DR 5809 NORTHWOOD DR EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 2911721340022 2911721340023 WILLIAM C MASE KRISTI A MOTCH CONSTANCE M MASE EDWIN R MOTCH IV 5800 HIDDEN LA 5804 HIDDEN LA EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 2911721340025 G CRAIG CHRISTENSEN DEBRA ANN CHRISTENSEN 5812 HIDDEN LA EDINA MN 55436 2911721340028 BRIAN E BELLOWS 5205 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436 2911721340031 RUTH A THORP JAMES C THORP 5305 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436 2911721340026 JEFFREY S RIDLEY CYNTHIA P RIDLEY 5213 DUNDEE RD EDINA MN 55436 2911721340029 JOHN BBERGSTAD ANN L BERGSTAD 5209 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436 2911721340032 STEVEN P DREYER ANNA M DREYER 5309 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436 ttiquettes faciles a peler ♦ Consultez la feuille www.avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 5960""` Sens de chargement cl ihstruction 1- 800 -GO -AVERY Easy Peel Labels ��+ bee Instruction Sheet i Feed Paper for Ea Feature � !A QAVEI2Y ®5960 Yae I Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5960TM ..�� Peel j ry 2911721340033 2911721340034 2911721340035 KATHRYN A DENN LISA A JORGENSEN CARLSON CONSTRUCTION INC JOHN E DENN GREGORY S JORGENSEN PO BOX 569 '17 MIRROR LAKES DR 5401 MIRROR LAKES DR WILLMAR MN 56201 INA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 2911721340036 2911721340037 2911721340038 MICHAEL E BARCELOW PATTI G GITTLEMAN STEVEN J WISE HEIDI A BARCELOW ANDREW J GITTLEMAN BRENDA R HAMILTON WISE 5809 SOUTH DR 5805 SOUTH DR 5801 SOUTH DR EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 2911721340039 2911721340040 2911721340041 GLENN A MCCABE STEVEN M SCHMITZ JACUQELINE M LUND 5813 HIDDEN LA SALLY M SCHMITZ. COLBY B LUND EDINA MN 55436 5809 HIDDEN LA 5805 HIDDEN LA EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 2911721340042 2911721340043 2911721340044 JOHN R NEVE MATTHEW J ANDERSON JEFFREY SWANSON DANA C NEVE KRISTIN A ANDERSON ANN SWANSON 5801 HIDDEN LA 5800 SOUTH DR 5804 SOUTH DR EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 291172'1340045 2911721420008 2911721420009 RANDY T MORGAN THOMAS C EISENSTADT ROBERT R LUTTIO CARYL A MORGAN ELIZABETH C EISENSTADT BEVERLY J LUTTIO 5808 SOUTH DR 5813 NORTHWOOD DR 5105 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436 - EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 2911721420010 2911721420011 2911721420012 LINDA M JONES WILLIAM R BARBER MELODY A CHESTLER JASON R JONES BARBARA BARBER LARRY S CHESTLER 5109 MIRROR LAKES DR 5113 MIRROR LAKES DR 5117 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 2911721420013 2911721420014 2911721430001 JULIE P BURROWS WOODDALE BUILDERS INC MARK B WEISBERG JEFFREY M BURROWS 5434 FELTL RD KRISTI B WEISBERG 4513 BRUCE AVE MINNETONKA MN 55345 5133 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55436 2911721430005 2911721430006 2911721430007 GRACE H MCNEILL KEITH A BEVERIDGE LAURA.E SCHERF 5400 GLENGARRY PKWY JAMIE L SCHULTZ DAVID G SCHERF 5308 GLENGARRY PKWY EDINA MN 55436 5312 GLENGARRY PKWY EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 2911721430008 2911721430009 2911721430010 PAUL J HARMON WILLIAM SUTPHEN KARRI L HANSEN 5304 GLENGARRY PKWY 5300 GLENGARRY PKWY ERIC P HANSEN 5212 GLENGARRY PKWY EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 911721430011 2911721430012 2911721430013 GAIL A CARLSON PATRICIA A WITT MARY ANN B HARRIS BRUCE A CARLSON JEFFREY M WITT JOHN F HARRIS 5200 GLENGARRY PKWY 5208 GLENGARRY PKWY 5204 GLENGARRY PKWY EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 ttiquettes faciles a peler ♦ Consultez la feuille www.avery.com ri'inctnirtinn 1- Ann -GO -AVERY Easy Peel Labels LA i — we mstrucuon meet i M4JW m iFeed Paper � for Easy Peel Feature 1 VHi1�Vl AVF-RY65960TM Use very® TEMPLATE 5960Tm THOMAS A WELCH DEBBIE L WELCH r 2911721430014 2911721430015 JULIAN J IDZOREK 2911721430016 TODD DAVID PETERSON MARK J JOHNSON KATHERINE A KERSTEN FAITH E IDZOREK FERN MIELS PETERSON 5209 CHANTREY RD 5201 CHANTREY RD 5205 CHANTREY RD EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 2911721430017 2911721430018 2911721430019 ORI R LEVY GARY R SETTERBERG THOMAS A WELCH DEBBIE L WELCH LOTEM HANNAH LEVY CAROLYN A SETTERBERG 5301 CHANTREY RD 5309 CHANTREY RD 5213 CHANTREY RD EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 2911721430020 2911721430021 THOMAS L SCHAEFER 2911721430022 ELIZABETH M 1RUNSVOLD JOHN CASHMORE LYNN M SCHAEFER DANIEL P BRUNSVOLD EDWARD PARRY III 5317 CHANTREY RD 5401 CHANTREY RD 5313 CHANTREY RD EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 2911721430025 2911721430026 SUSAN L STYRBICKI 2911721430027 THOMAS C MAHLUM PAUL MELIN JOHN M STYRBICKI KATIE E M MAHLUM MARI MELIN 5400 CHANTREY RD 5312 CHANTREY RD 5404 CHANTREY RD. EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 2911721430028 2911721430029 ANTHONY B RAGOZZINO 2911721430030 MICHAEL C HIME KENNETH A HOTZ ANN J RAG07ZINO BARBARA E HIME HOLLIS J HOTZ 5304 CHANTREY RD 5300 CHANTREY RD 5308 CHANTREY RD EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 2911721430031 2911721430032 2911721430033 RITA M DOMKE /TRUST NATALIE D WU MICHAEL MELAND 5204 CHANTREY RD 5200 CHANTREY RD JEFFREY GROFFSKY EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 5208 CHANTREY RD EDINA MN 55436 MN 554 6 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 2911721430034 2911721430035 2911721430036 SARAH P O'NEAL TAMARA N DEMARCO SHEILA A CRON 5706 NORTHWOOD DR JAMES A PHILIPPE RAFFY EDINA MN 55436 O DR 5700 NORTHWOOD 5710 NORTHWOOD OR EDINA MN 55436 MN 554 6 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 2911721430037 2911721430040 TERRENCE K ANDERSON 2911721430041 GRETCHEN M SCHAEFER HOLLY L ROCKWELL CYNTHIA L ANDERSON CURT 0 SCHAEFER COURTNEY V ROCKWELL 5201 DONCASTER WAY 5207 DONCASTER WAY 5129 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 2911721430042 2911721430043 2911721430046 CHARLOTTE M ABRAHAMSON LORI F MERTES THOMAS H HUSSIAN CHARLES J ABRAHAMSON JACK W MERTES SARAH B HUSSIAN 5213 DONCASTER WAY 5221 DONCASTER WAY 5209 DONCASTER WAY EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 2911721430049 2911721430051 2911721430052 PAUL G WALTHOUR SARAH E NESSAN GERHARD BRAHMS CAROL C BRAHMS JULIE A WALTHOUR DOUGLAS E NESSAN 5229 DONCASTER WAY 5605 AYRSHIRE BLVD 5225 DONCASTER WAY EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 ttiquettes faciles a peter ♦ Consultez la feuille www.avery.com ..—.!___ I- __L_ -e. A%PCDuo car-AMC cane tin rhmmomont d'instruction 1- 800 -GO -AVERY Easy Peel Labels i. — bee Instruction Sheet i Paper ��. for Easy Peel Feature /A WAVIERY65960Tm Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5960TM iFeed 1 2911721430053 2911721430054 2911721430055 JOHN H GETSCH RONALD L PETERSON MONIQUE JEPSON ADELLA A GETSCH NATALIE A PETERSON MATTHEW C JEPSON 5404 GLENGARRY PKWY 5405 CHANTREY RD 5217 DONCASTER WAY -IINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 3211721120001 3211721120002 3211721120003 TIMOTHY J HUGHES SHARON L MCDONALD GERALD A HOLGUIN ASHLEY C HUGHES 5504 GLENGARRY PKWY CAROL P HOLGUIN 5500 GLENGARRY PKWY EDINA MN 55436 5508 GLENGARRY PKWY EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 3211721120004 3211721120005 3211721120006 JOHN R MCINTIRE MARCIA H REVERE W WILLIAM WOLD CARMELA R MCINTIRE JOHN J REVERE LORETTA M WOLD 5512 GLENGARRY PKWY 5516 GLENGARRY PKWY 5520 GLENGARRY PKWY EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 3211721120007 3211721120008 3211721120009 ROSEMARY LARSON SALLY J OLSON MATTHEW S O'CONNELL PERRY T LARSON CHARLES E OLSON KATE N H O'CONNELL 5524 GLENGARRY PKWY 5528 GLENGARRY PKWY 5532 GLENGARRY PKWY EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 3211721120010 3211721120011 3211721120012 MARGARET L JOY JEANNE M HEILIG LAURIE ANN SWILER LARRY A JOY 5501 GLENGARRY PKWY GREGORY C SWILER 5713 AYRSHIRE BLVD EDINA MN 55436 5505 GLENGARRY PKWY EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 ,211721120013 3211721120014 3211721120015 DIANE L BLAKE GREGORY L DOMKE MICHAEL W KELLY DAVID P BLAKE 5513 GLENGARRY PKWY BRIGITA V KELLY 5509 GLENGARRY PKWY EDINA MN 55436 5517 GLENGARRY PKWY EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 3211721120016 3211721120017 3211721120018 ROGER H CARLSON MICHAEL D SHEIMO RODNEY W FORDAHL CAROL A CARLSON LINDA M SHEIMO CARRIE G FORDAHL 5521 GLENGARRY PKWY 5525 GLENGARRY PKWY 5529 GLENGARRY PKWY EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 3211721120019 3211721120020 3211721120021 STANLEY C OLSEN JR JAMES P KELLY PAUL M HUSSIAN 5533 GLENGARRY PKWY GRACE E KELLY ANNE KELLY HUSSIAN EDINA MN 55436 5701 AYRSHIRE BLVD 5408 DONCASTER WAY EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 3211721120022 3211721120023 3211721120024 SUZANNE R HOLDERNESS DEBORAH MANGHAM JESSICA M COOK ROBERT M HOLDERNESS 5709 AYRSHIRE BLVD ARNE M COOK 5705 AYRSHIRE BLVD EDINA MN 55436 5408 GLENGARRY PKWY EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 '1721120025 3211721120026 3211721120027 BERT LEDDER TIMOTHY P MCILWAIN WAYNE R GLAUS -AROL I LEDDER KIMBERLY A MCILWAIN LYNNE M GLAUS 5409 CHANTREY RD 5408 CHANTREY RD 5405 DONCASTER WAY EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 ttiquettes faciles a peler ♦ Consultez la feuille www.avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 5960""` Sens de chargement Onstruction 1- 800 -GO -AVERY Easy Peel Labels �m gee instruction bneet i 4,1* � i — � jFeed Paper mm— for Easy Peel Feature 1 UAVERY65960T"" 1J Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5960TM 3211721120028 3211721120029 3211721120030 JEANNE M DOEPKE AHMAD KOUATLI MARY R WATSON JAMES L DOEPKE 4704 SUNNYSIDE RD GEORGE W WATSON 5409 DONCASTER WAY EDINA MN 55424 5417 DONCASTER WAY EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 3211721120031 3211721120032 TAMRA L MAUGHAN 3211721120033 INDEPT SCHOOL DIST NO 273 ROBERT WESTLUND 5421 DONCASTER WAY STANLEY R MAUGHAN EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDINA MN 55436 5501 DONCASTER WAY 5701 NORMANDALE RD I EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55435 3211721120034 3211721120035 3211721120036 LOREN J LORIG DARREN J RUSCHY ROBERT N FOLEY AILEEN M FOLEY BARBARA J LORIG ANN P RUSCHY 5509 DONCASTER WAY 5513 DONCASTER WAY 5517 DONCASTER WAY EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 3211721120037 3211721120038 3211721120039 ROBERT C MOLHOEK SCOTT R DANIELSON BECKEY ANN E DANIELSON PATTI J HANKES MATTHEW W HANKES KARI LYNN MOLHOEK 5521 DONCASTER WAY 5501 MERRITT CIR 5504 DONCASTER WAY EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 3211721120040 3211721120041 3211721120042 JEFF GRISWOLD SARA A SILBURN PATRICK HAGER MARY HAGER CHIKA T GRISWOLD JAMES R SILBURN 5508 DONCASTER WAY 5512 DONCASTER WAY 5516 DONCASTER WAY EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 3211721120043 3211721120044. ZAKERY KROSCHEL 3211721120045 E M ST JOHN C EICHTEN CHRISTI A EICHTEN LISA M BOLIN CIR 5517 MERRITT CIR 5517 5520 DONCASTER WAY 5525 MERRITT CIR MN 554 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 3211721120046 3211721120047 3211721120048 ELIZABETH H LEEPER PAUL J SERAFIN SYLVIA L CARLSON JOHN J CARLSON DONALD S LEEPER KATHLEEN R SERAFIN 5513 MERRITT CIR 5509 MERRITT CIR 5505 MERRITT CIR EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 3211721120049 3211721120050 TERRY A PREUSSE 3211721120051 TERESA L PEARSON BARBARA A FELKER ARTHUR FELKER 5504 MERRITT CIR 5508 MERRITT CIR 5500 MERRITT CIR EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 3211721120052 3211721120053 PATRICIA J MARINOVICH 3211721120054 KENNETH E CARNEY MARGARET E SAMPSELL MICHAEL R MARINOVICH DONNA A CARNEY JOHN E SAMPSELL 5512 MERRITT CIR 5516 MERRITT CIR 5520 MERRITT CIR EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 3211721120055 3211721120056 3211721120057 SIGRID REDPATH TIMOTHY W COATS KIM L JUNG 5528 MERRITT CIR DAVID J REDPATH M J OKEEFE -COATS 5524 MERRITT CIR EDINA MN 55436 5532 MERRITT CIR EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 kiquettes faciles a peler A Consultez la feuille www.avery.com ... _ -- I- __L- _:. — -nv® enenmc C^me AI rMernmmant d'instruetidn 1- 800 -GO -AVERY AMAV-00`008 -11, w03- AjaAe-MMM 3211721120058 TAMES J D'AU RORA =NISE M D'AURORA X36 MERRITT CIR EDINA MN 55436 3211721120061 MICHAEL J KELLEY MARILYN KELLEY 5509 CHANTREY RD EDINA MN 55436 3211721120064 MERIJEAN STENSBY GARY E STENSBY 5521 CHANTREY RD EDINA MN 55436 3211721120067 JAMES R BAKER BABARA M BAKER 5533 CHANTREY RD EDINA MN 55436 3211721210012 JOSEPH P BURKE CAROL A BURKE 5816 AYRSHIRE BLVD -DINA MN 55436 3211721210015 SHANNON N PRESTHUS JOHN P PRESTHUS 5509 DUNDEE RD EDINA MN 55436 3211721210024 BRUCE G ARMSTRONG 5521 DUNDEE RD EDINA MN 55436 3211721210027 KELLY J TRITZ GEORGIA D KAISER 5533 DUNDEE RD EDINA MN 55436 3211721210030 JANE EILERTSON DARRIN L EILERTSON 5532 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436 3211721210039 RUTHANNE COLEMAN MARK T COLEMAN 5808 AYRSHIRE BLVD EDINA MN 55436 uoPrulsul,p apina; el zalinsuo:) ;uaws5imp ap suas v 3211721120059 MELISSA A LINDHOLM DAVID R LINDHOLM 5501 CHANTREY RD EDINA MN 55436 3211721120062 BRUCE HILLER BARBARA HILLER 5513 CHANTREY RD EDINA MN 55436 3211721120065 L CARL STARICH 5525 CHANTREY RD EDINA MN 55436 3211721120068 WARREN H PUELSTON 5537 CHANTREY RD EDINA MN 55436 3211721210013 PAUL P KAROS 5501 DUNDEE RD EDINA MN 55436 3211721210016 MARY WORNSON OTOOLE JOHN J OTOOLE 5513 DUNDEE RD EDINA MN 55436 3211721210025 JAMES J MALONE CAMILLE J MALONE 5525 DUNDEE RD EDINA MN 55436 3211721210028 WILLIAM J DALLMAN ANGELA R DALLMAN 5537 DUNDEE RD EDINA MN 55436 3211721210031 NANCY E IMHOLTE DOUGLAS A IMHOLTE 5528 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436 3211721210040 KARA J MILLER BRUCE A MILLER 5501 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436 � 0965 0A:3AV 3!jege6 a1 zesiyin �a1ad @ selpe; sananbi4 3211721120060 SUSAN STUDENT 5505 CHANTREY RD EDINA MN 55436 3211721120063 SCOTT A REICH 5517 CHANTREY RD EDINA MN 55436 3211721120066 KAREN C LORENCE 5529 CHANTREY RD EDINA MN 55436 3211721210011 SHERYL A LEILL ERIC P LEILL 5405 DUNDEE RD EDINA MN 55436 3211721210014 SALLY ARNDT JOHN BRAZEL 5505 DUNDEE RD EDINA MN 55436 3211721210017 MARK P KEREKES JULIE A KEREKES 5517 DUNDEE RD EDINA MN 55436 3211721210026 KEVIN W RAASCH COLLEEN L RAASCH 5529 DUNDEE RD EDINA MN 55436 3211721210029 ROBERT D GRANQUIST KAREN S GRANQUIST 5536 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436 3211721210038 BARBARA WAGTSKJOLD BARBARA WAGTSKJOLD 5804 AYRSHIRE BLVD EDINA MN 55436 3211721210041 ELIZABETH R BARNETT 5505 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436 W0965 3nd iaaAd T ainwal �aad Ase3 ao} .aded paaiT � sau e iaa. lse AHMV -00 -008 -L wog tiane-ANMM 321172121OD42 TERRY A BRILL ELIZABETH A BRILL 5509 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436 3211721210045 SUSAN SCOTT JOHN S DOERING 5521 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436 3211721210048 KAREN R WILDE DAVID J WILDE 5533 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436 3211721210051 TODD A NIELAND BARBARA J NIELAND 5500 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436 3211721210054 MATTHEW R SCHRAG LAURA L SCHRAG 5516 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436 3211721210057 KRISTI M LALAN HOLLY J HERLAND 5408 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436 uoi:pn ,sump apma; el zallnsuo:) 3211721210060 ROGER CARLSON/TRUST 5528 CHANTREY RD EDINA MN 55436 3211721210063 STEVEN FREEMAN CARRIE L FREEMAN 5516 CHANTREY RD EDINA MN 55436 3211721210066 DOUGLAS FOLLESTAD DIANE FOLLESTAD 5504 CHANTREY RD EDINA MN 55436 -- Zuewa6JeLp ap sues 3W096S 0,l 3AV 1lject aj zas jijfI v . I salad a sall3e} sauanbiq 3211721210043 3211721210044 WILLIAM HOUSTON TERRY L SNOVER MARILYN HOUSTON JEAN S SNOVER 5513 MIRROR LAKES DR 5517 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 3211721210046 3211721210047 SUNNY S KIM NANCY KIZERSHOT . 5528 MERRITT CIR DONALD KIZERSHOT EDINA MN 55436 5529 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 3211721210049 3211721210050 DAVID S JOHNSON NANCY J GUSTAFSON 5537 MIRROR LAKES DR DENNIS GUSTAFSON EDINA MN 55436 5541 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436 3211721210052 3211721210053 MARY M SHERMAN MARK JMOXNESS BRADLEY W SHERMAN BARBARA A MOXNESS 5504 MIRROR LAKES DR 5512 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 3211721210055 3211721210056 JUNG KIM I WENDY L MORRIS 3694 IONA WAY SW. FREDERICK L MORRIS ALEXANDRIA MN 56308 5524 MIRROR LAKES DR EDINA MN 55436 3211721210058 3211721210059 CYNTHIA R FRERICHS NICHOLAS J ESSMA CRAIG D FRERICHS AMY C ESSMA 5536 CHANTREY RD 5532 CHANTREY RD EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 3211721210061 3211721210062 JANET M NELSON STEVEN E CULBERT DAVID A NELSON AMY E CULBERT 5524 CHANTREY RD 5520 CHANTREY RD EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 3211721210064 3211721210065 EDWARD SWETMAN JR SARAH M PATZLOFF 5512 CHANTREY RD PAUL W PATZLOFF EDINA MN 55436 5508 CHANTREY RD EDINA MN 55436 3211721210067 LISA L FARNAM JAY J FARNAM 5500 CHANTREY RD EDINA MN 55436 T ��11 ( T a�n ;eat lead �(se3 �o} jaded P80AT .096S 31VIdW31 ®Many asl ! W A965 r,�1 A ?IaAd lam// 1 F_ _U � JQ slage'l lead Ase i See Instruction Sheet 0 �lA� WAVERY0596 OTM Easy Peel Labels i ' Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5960T"" Q: j Feed Paper P for Easy Peel Feature 1 1 2911721340009 2911721340010 2911721340011 SUE TUTHILL SUE TUTHILL RICHARD E UIHLEIN 'ARY SCHIESS C GARY SCHIESS LISA R UIHLEIN ) DUNDEE RD 5200 DUNDEE RD 985 ALDRIN DR _ NA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 EAGAN MN 55121 2911721340012 2911721340013 2911721340014 PATTI NANNE AUDREY D MILLER WILLIAM SHERMAN PATRICIA A SHERMAN MARTY NANNE 1621. W CATALPA ST #2 5216 DUNDEE RD 5300 DUNDEE RD CHICAGO IL 60640 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 2911721340015 2911721340016 2911721340017 MICHAEL E RUSSELL MARY B HESDORFFER STEWART J RALLIS MONICA J RALLIS MARCIA J RUSSELL ALAN W HESDORFFER 5316 DUNDEE RD 5400 DUNDEE RD 5308 DUNDEE RD EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 3211721210018 3211721210019 RICHARD A WESTIN 3211721210020 THOMAS W LAEDTKE RONALD R VESSEY 5408 DUNDEE RD ELISE T LAEDTKE JUDITH A VESSEY EDINA MN 55436 5500 DUNDEE RD 5404 DUNDEE RD EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 3211721210021 3211721210022 3211721210023 TRACI D EGLY ROBERT L RYKHUS JR HERBERT FRENCH CAROLYN FRENCH STEVEN A EGLY HEATHER M RYKHUS 5508 DUNDEE RD 5512 DUNDEE RD 5504 DUNDEE RD EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 "TINA MN 55436 3211721210032 3211721210033 THOMAS M LEVERENTZ 3211721210034 MARSHALL W SCHWARTZ JUDITH DUGAN OLSON JANICE E LEVERENTZ JUDITH P SCHWARTZ DAVID B OLSON 5520 DUNDEE RD 5528 DUNDEE RD 5516 DUNDEE RD EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 3211721210035 3211721240056 SYLVIA M LOGERQUIST 3211721240057 DALE A SATTLER SUSAN PETERSON DOROTHY MCINTYRE CYNTHIA L SATTI.ER SCOTT G PETERSON 5540 DUNDEE RD 5600 DUNDEE RD 5532 DUNDEE RD EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 EDINA MN 55436 3211721240058 DANIEL FINE 5604 DUNDEE RD EDINA MN 55436 Consultez la feuille vvww.avery.com FUTURE SIDEWALK FINANCING POLICY CITY OF EDINA INTRODUCTION: The City of Edina is experiencing a need to review the financing of future sidewalks and pathways through -out the City. This need came about from recent requests for sidewalks along Maple Road and from Edina School District. This report covers a very aggressive future sidewalk plan and will be included in this year's City Comprehensive Plan. The following describes the thought - process and potential funding mechanisms for these future sidewalks and pathways. PURPOSE: Determine preliminary costs to install sidewalks and pathways within the City. Analyze potential financing policy to fund sidewalks. PROCESS: All sidewalk requests are and will continue to be `petition initiated" with the exception of State -Aid reconstruction routes. PROPOSED SIDEWALK REQUIREMENTS: Currently sidewalks and pathways follow many collector and arterial streets within the City. City staff analyzed the existing pedestrian ways using the following criteria to propose new sidewalks and pathways: • Identify all existing sidewalks. within the City. • Identify all retail business walking zones within the City. • Identify all park walking zones within the City. • Identify all public schools walking zones within the City. • Identify all public transit facilities within the City. • Identify all proposed State -Aid funded sidewalks. Edina School District currently uses a 0.7 mile walking zone policy for elementary schools and 1 mile walking zone for middle and senior high schools. Staff also used the 0.7 mile radius walking zones for all retail business centers, parks, and public elementary schools along with the one mile walking zone radius for middle and senior high schools. Sidewalks and pathways are proposed for both regional type loops and for destination type walks. The regional loops would allow a pedestrian to circle any one of the four quadrants of the City; typically these routes are found along State -Aid Streets. The destination type walks would allow a person living within any of the above walking zones to access these destinations from their residences. Sidewalks and pathways within the City are divided into the following four categories: State -Aid sidewalks and pathways are located adjacent to Municipal State- G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Sidewalks n BikewaysUscellaneous \FUTURE SIDEWALK FINANCING POLICY final.doc Page 1 09/18/98 Aid Streets (MSAS) and are funded from MSAS funds. School Zone sidewalks and pathways are identified by the City and Edina School District and are located within the identified school walking zones. Destination Zone sidewalks and pathways are typically located along roadways that are geographically a link between two existing systems and adjacent to a roadway that carries over 750 vehicles per day. Local / Low Volume Street Zone sidewalks and pathways are any sidewalks or pathways that do not meet any of the above definitions. FINANCING: Financing of the proposed sidewalks can be separated into four categories: 1. State -Aid Costs that cover any proposed sidewalk located adjacent to a State - Aid designated roadway. 2. Public School Zone Costs that will be split between City funds, School funds, and Special Property Assessments. 3. Destination Zone Costs that will be split between City funds and Special Property Assessments. 4. Local / Low Volume Street Zone Costs will be financed through Special Property Assessments. Special property assessment policy will be reviewed per each individual project. The City Council will have the discretion to order a project assessed on a per adjacent lot basis, per local area assessment, or a combination of both. City staff recommends the following percentages be used for financing these sidewalks and pathways. The Edina School District staff was given this information last July along with a proposed sidewalk - pathway map. However, due to the individual school Site Councils schedules City staff has not received their comments. G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Sidewalks n Bikeways\Miscellaneous \FUTURE SIDEWALK FINANCING POLICY final.doc Page 2 09/18/98 STATE -AID COSTS ENTITY PERCENT OF COST STATE -AID 100 SCHOOL ZONE COSTS ENTITY PERCENT OF COST CITY 25 SCHOOL 25 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 50 DESTINATION ZONE COSTS ENTITY PERCENT OF COST CITY 25 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 75 LOCAL I LOW VOLUME STREET ZONE COSTS ENTITY PERCENT OF COST SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 100 G: \Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Sidewalks n Bikeways \Miscellaneous \FUTURE SIDEWALK FINANCING POLICY final.doc Page 3 09/18/98 These percentages would translate into the following costs: ENTITY TOTAL COST 10 -YR AVERAGE STATE -AID $2,261,000.00 $226,000.00 CITY $495,000.00 $50,000.00 SCHOOL $250,000.00 $25,000.00 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $1,114,000.00 $111,000.00 TOTAL $4,120,000.00 $412,000.00 CONCLUSION: The City sidewalk funding policy entails a cost split for any proposed sidewalk that is located on a street with Average Daily Traffic of over 750 vehicles within the City. Any proposed sidewalk located on a State -Aid route will be financed through State -Aid financing. Any proposed sidewalk located within a public school walking zone will have a cost split between the Residences, School, and City. G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Sidewalks n Bikeways\Miscellaneous \FUTURE SIDEWALK FINANCING POLICY final-floc Page 4 09/18/98 �5 Co�Y CITY OF EDINA TRANSPORTATION PLAN As k 91N�1� o e vi co 0 mil._ �• // PREPARED BY: SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. One Carlson Parkway North, Suite 150 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55447 (612) 475 -0010 March 1999 DSRF No. 0983117 16. Use economic and environmentally sound management techniques for snow and ice removal. 17. Replace substandard bridges and bridges that present safety or traffic problems. Transit/TDM 18. Participate in the I -494 Commission to encourage all forms of travel demand management in order to reduce vehicle miles of travel, reduce petroleum consumption, and improve air quality. 19. Review all major new developments in light of the potential for • ridesharing including bus accessibility, preferential parking for carpools /vanpools, and mixed -use development. 20. Support HOV bypasses and other preferential treatments for transit and high occupancy vehicles on streets and highways. 21. Include transit planning in the construction or upgrading of streets and highways. 22. Pursue development of a demonstration project to provide a circulator system within the Southdale /Centennial Lakes major activity center. Parking 23. Review new developments for adequacy of parking based upon need, the potential for joint use of parking facilities and opportunities to encourage ridesharing. 24. Continue to limit on- street parking in and near congested commercial areas. Pedestrian /Bicycle 25. Provide accessibility to pedestrians and bicycles at major activity centers, including necessary storage facilities. 26. Create pedestrian and bicycle interconnections among major generators, with continuity across major roadways and other barriers. 27. Provide sidewalks and safe crossing in high pedestrian danger areas, including high - traffic streets, commercial areas, areas with transit access and in high density residential locations. City of Edina Transportation Plan 5 March 1999 28. Provide adequate signage along all bike paths including areas of conflict with pedestrians and automobile traffic. Goods Movement 29. Serve major truck users and intermodal facilities with good minor arterial access to the metropolitan highway system. Funding and Jurisdiction 30. Pursue and support regional or multi- community funding sources for improvements that provide regional or multi- community benefit 31. Support of research efforts into more efficient and cost- effective management, maintenance and replacement of street surfaces 32. Support governmental jurisdiction over roadways that reflect the role of the roadway in the overall transportation system 33. Develop and support legislation permitting a transportation utility City of Edina Transportation Plan 6 March 1999 CITY OF EDINA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION POLICY w9 0�C to� Wq1iri, April 2005, -Edina Transportation Commission recommended the FINAL DRAFT on January 6, 2005 for City Council consideration. -Edina City Council action taken on April 5, 2005 — Approved. �: Pedestrian /Bicycle 1. Provide accessibility to pedestrians and bicycles at major activity centers, including necessary storage facilities. 2. Create pedestrian and bicycle interconnections among major generators, with continuity across major roadways and other barriers. 3. Provide sidewalks and safe crossing in high pedestrian danger areas, including high - traffic streets, commercial areas, areas with transit access, and in high- density residential locations. 4. Provide adequate signage along all bike paths including areas of conflict with pedestrians and automobile traffic. Goods Movement 1. Serve major truck users and intermodal facilities with good minor arterial access to the metropolitan highway system. Funding and Jurisdiction 1. Pursue and support regional or multi - community funding sources for improvements that provide regional or multi - community benefit. 2. Support research efforts into more efficient and cost - effective management, maintenance and replacement of street surfaces. 3. Support governmental jurisdiction over roadways that reflect the role of the roadway in the overall transportation system. 4. Develop and support legislation permitting a transportation utility. In addition to the policies contained in the Transportation Plan. the Edina Transportation Commission has adopted the following policies: Roadway Design 1. Design collector and arterial roadway corridors to be compatible with other transportation modes including transit, bicycle and pedestrian. 2. Encourage beautification of local corridors, where appropriate, with amenities such as boulevard trees, decorative street lighting, and monuments. City of Edina Transportation Policy 4 April 2005 Community Attitude and Interest Survey Executive Summary of Citizen Survey Results Overview of the Methodology The City of Edina conducted a Parks and Recreation Facilities and Services Needs Assessment Survey during September of 2006 to establish priorities for the future development of parks and-recreation facilities, programs and services within the community. The survey was designed to obtain statistically valid results from households throughout the City of Edina. The survey was administered by mail. Leisure Vision worked extensively with City of Edina officials in the development of the survey questionnaire. This included holding a series of focus groups and stakeholder interviews with City of Edina elected officials, staff, board members, and community members on August 2and 3, 2006. This Work allowed the survey to be tailored to issues of strategic importance to effectively plan the future system. In September 2006, surveys were mailed to a random sample of 3,000 households in the City of Edina. Approximately three days after the surveys were mailed, each household that received a survey also received an electronic voice message encouraging them to complete the survey. The goal was to obtain a total of at least 500 completed surveys. This goal was far exceeded with a total of 865 surveys being completed. The results of the random sample of 865 households have a 95% level of confidence with a precision of at least +/ -3.4 %. The following pages summarize major survey findings: Executive Summary - 1 Need for Parks and Recreation Facilities From the list of 27 various parks and recreation facilities, respondents were asked to indicate which ones they and members of their household have a need for. The following summarizes key findings: Six of the 27 parks and recreation facilities had at least 40% of respondent households indicate they have a need for them. These six facilities include: walking and biking trails (86 %), natural areas and wildlife habitats (66 %), 18 and 9 hole golf courses (49 %), playground equipment (45 %), indoor art center (40 %) and indoor fitness and exercise facilities (40 %). 07. Percentage of Respondent Households That Have a Need for Various Parks and Recreation Facilities by percentage of respondents (multiple choices could be made) Walking and biking trails 86%, Natural areas and wildlife habitats -,-166% 18 and 9 hole golf courses S 49% Playground equipment 45% Art center ::40% Indoor fitness and exercise facilities 40% Indoor runningMalking track 37% Outdoor tennis courts 37% Indoor swimming pools 3:7% Warming houses :�t, 36% Indoor golf dome 32 %; Indoor playground 31% Outdoor spray pool parks 28% Outdoor hockey rinks 26% Soccer fields 26% Off -leash dog park 26% Indoor hockey and figure skating rink 1 24% Indoor nature center 23% Senior center ' ° 21% Baseball fields 20% Indoor sports facility 19% Indoor basketball and volleyball court .19% Football fields 12% Softball fields 12% Skateboard park 7% Lacrosse fields 6% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Soiure: Leisure Vi::iomETC LLStilule (November 2006) Executive Summary - 10 Need For Parks and Recreation Facilities in Edina From the list of 27 parks and recreation facilities, respondents were asked to indicate which ones they and members of their household have a need for. The graph below shows the estimated number of households in the City of Edina that have a need for various parks and recreation facilities, based on 20,996 households in the City. Wa. Estimated Number of Households in the City of Edina That Have a Need for Various Parks and Recreation Facilities by number of households based on 20,996 households in the City of Edina (Source 2000 US Census) Walking and biking trails Natural areas and wildlife habitats 18 and 9 hole golf courses playground equipment Art center Indoor fitness and exercise facilities Indoor running/walking track Outdoor tennis courts Indoor swimming pools Warming houses Indoor golf dome Indoor playground Outdoor spray pool parks Outdoor hockey rinks Soccer fields Off -leash dog park Indoor hockey and figure skating rink Indoor nature center Senior center Baseball fields Indoor sports facility Indoor basketball and volleyball court Football fields Softball fields Skateboard park Lacrosse field is 5,9921 21 - 5,543 5.501 5,480 5,039 - 4,850 - 4;304 - 4,094 3,884 _ 3,g84 2.562 02,478 1,533 .218 Source Leisiue Lson ETC Institute (Nox 'en1xr2006) - 10,183 9,469 1 8,293 18,293 7,811 1 7,769 7,685 7,622 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 Executive Summary - 11 SCHOOL BUS ram I. 4 SCHOOL BUS tb 75 i4A Location Doncaster 5417 Doncaster 5517 Doncaster 5417 Doncaster 5417 Doncaster - 5413 Doncaster - 5512 Date of Volume and J Counts 1975 to rresent nO 1:404 . C�(�Cc i C M/F ADT M/F 85% Sat. ADT Sat. 85% 09/18100- 09/25/00 1515 34.1 843 35.5 04/24/01-05/01/01 1746 31.5 1002 31.8 08/06/02- 08/13/02 1504 31.1 910 31.8 09/26/03- 10/01/03 973 29.3 160 30.4 08/03/07- 08/10/07 213 31.4 128 29 08/03/07- 08/10/07 703 28.8 115 29.8 Sun. ADT 758 815 896 98 107 91 Date Las ted: Au, .2007 By: B. Tate Sun. 85% 35 31.9 31.4 30.2 29.5 29.9 Page 1 of 1 e,5- 7o - -= -3 /, V ^--r �, Data File Doncaster Wav 5413 Printed 8/16/2007 Pa_e : 1 Headinp-1 Heading2 I c.( G"4S Heading3 Title 1 Title2 : Doncasater Way - 5413 13/Q? _ /j% /D ? Site: Date: 07" 17 Title3 Interval Mon 30 Tue 31 Wed 1 Thu 2 Fri 3 Sat 4 Sun 5 Weekday Avg. Begin N'5 5B N$. *�$ N_$.. -._ ?�.- NS - -S$.. N$ $$ N.3 SB N5 56 S$ 12:AM + r r • • i ► r + ■ I 1 1 0 • 01:00 • • • + r • ■ • r r 0 0 0 0 • 02:00 + • • • ■ / ' ■ / * 0 0 1 0 . s 03:00 + / ■ ■ • / r ■ • r 1 1 0 1 • 04:00 • ' • • ' * • * * • 0 0 0 1 • 05:00 ► w rt • • w • r r ■ 1 1 1 0 r ■ 06:00 * • ■ • • r * + * ■ 1 0 0 0 07:00 * r • * • • * + * • 3 1 0 0 • 08:00 + ' ■ * / / / ' + / 1 0 2 2 ■ • 09:00 rt w . ■ / • ■ + ■ * 4 11 1 3 i + 10:00 * r r ■ w • ■ • • * 2 6 3 3 s r 11:00 * * * • • * * 15 8 3 3 0 3 15 8 12:PM * * * * * * * 8 9 6 4 6 3 8 9 01:00 * ■ • + ■ ■ ' • 7 10 12 6 7 5 7 10 02:00 * ■ ' • • * • • 6 5 3 2 5 3 6 5 03:00 + + • / r / r • 9 6 4 2 7 4 9 6 04:00 ■ ■ + ► + • ■ ■ 14 5 5 10 4 6 14 5 05:00 * • ■ ' ' ' ' ' 9 6 3 3 1 9 9 6 06:00 • • • * * * * * 8 8 2 3 6 5 8 8 07:00 * * ■ ' / r * ■ 8 5 3 0 1 3 8 5 08:00 * * * • ■ ' ' * 1 12 2 5 3 3 1 12 09:00 * r r • r + r r 2 1 3 5 1 1 2 1 10:00 * ■ • r • r + r 2 2 0 1 0 2 2 2 11:00 • * * • * • • 3 0 2 1 0 0 3 0 Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 92 77 62 66 50 57 92 77 Combined 0 0 0 0 169 128 107 Split % 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 54.4 45.6 48.4 51.6 46.7 53.3 54.4 45.6 AM Peak Hr " * * . * * * *. * 11:00 11:00 09:00 09:00 10:00 09:00 1 I :UO 11:00 Volume • * * ' • * • • 15 8 4 11 3 3 15 8 PM PeakHr • * • r ' • • • 04:00 08:00 01:00 04:00 01:00 05:00 04:00 08:00 Volume ' * * * * ' * * 14 12 12 10 7 9 14 12 M _ F (s ��N = !©% e,5- 7o - -= -3 /, V ^--r �, Data File Doncaster Wav 5413 Printed 8/16/2007 Pa_e : 1 Headinp-1 Headin.92 Heading3 Ti*' : Doncasater Way - 5413 Site: T Date: 08/06/07 Title3 Interval Mon 6 Tue 7 Wed 8 Thu 9 Fri 10 Sat 11 Sun 12 Weekday Avg. Begin � SR NF 5E3 NS S A)5 53 NO SS M5 525 N 4 5� M -- i2: _ 0 0 0 o z o 0 1 i o 01:00 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 * * " * 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 " * " w 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • • s * 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • w s s 0 0 05:00 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 1 * * + " 0 1 06:00 0 1 2 0 3 1 0 1 1 3 " w • • 1 1 07:00 1 6 3 5 3 6 2 5 5 8 * " * * 2 6 08:00 10 10 3 9 1 9 4 11 9 13 * * * * 5 10 09:00 2 6 5 6 7 7 5 4 8 8 " • * * 5 6 10:00 5 7 2 6 9 8 6 10 2 5 * • * * 4 7 11:00 9 7 10 9 10 9 3 7 0 0 " * * * 6 6 12:PM 3 8 11 9 9 9 6 9 s * • * * • 7 8 01:00 8 10 8 9 7 7 10 8 s ► ■ r * • 8 8 02:00 5 5 5 7 5 7 1 4 * * * * • s 4 5 03:00 9 5 6 8 9 10 7 6 * * + * * * 7 7 04:00 4 3 6 9 7 8 9 8 * * * + + 6 7 05:00 7 8 7 8 12 18 10 10 s * * * r s 9 II 06:00 7 4 8 5 2 5 8 6 + + ' ' ` 0 07:00 1 5 9 5 6 11 7 3 * s "• * * + 5 I, 08:00 5 2 6 II 6 6 4 3 * * * + + ` 5 5 09:00 3 4 2 3 3 3 4 3 * s * * ' 3 3 10:00 2 4 0 1 1 1 4 5 s * s w • s 1 2 11:00 3 1 2 0 2 4 0 3 1 ' Tot-'- 84 97 95 112 103 134 90 107 26 39 0 0 0 0 85 106 C. .red 181 207 237 197 65 0 0 191 Split '%, 46.4 53.6 45.9 54.1 43.5 56.5 45.7 54.3 40.0 60.0 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 44.5 55.5 ANI Peak Hr 08:00 08:00 11:00 08:00 11:00 08:00 10:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 * w * * 11:00 08:00 Volume 10 10 10 9 10 9 6 11 9 13 " * * ' 6 10 1' M PeakHr 03:00 01:00 12:00 08:00 05:00 05:00 01:00 05:00 * w * w * • 05:00 05:00 Volume 9 10 11 11 ' 12 18 10 10 + + • • s * 9 11 — Printed R/16/2007 Page Headinel I Heading2 C le CO (,ItJ 5 Heading3 Titlel : : Doncaster Way - 5512 `' 4 _ g /�p10 S Site: / D Date: 0 07/30/07 Title2 Title3 - - - -- - - - - - -- Interval M Mon 30 T Tue 31 W Wed 1 T Thu 2 F Fri 3 3 Sat 4 4 S Sun 5 e ee - Begin 4 4BNB BASB 4 4BNB BASB 4 4BNB BASB 4 4BNB B BASB 4 4BNB B BASB 4BNB B BASB 4 4BNB BASB 4 4BNB B BASB _ - r . . r r • • r rt r r Q 0 0 1 1 0 0 ■ ■ } 01:00 + } } » » r • r r • • ■ ■ ■ ■ * * 0 0 0 I I 0 0 * * * * 02:00 ` ` ` ` • • r 03:00 * * ' ' • • 04:00 . • • r r » » r r • • • • . . p 1 1 0 0 0 0 ` ` 05:00 " " + + . r r r r r r r Q 0 0 0 0 1 1 06:00 " r r • • } }' r r • • r 07:00 * * * * ` ` r + r + + } } ► ► • • " " 2 2 2 I I 2 2 * * ` ` 08:00 ■ ■ } } • • + 09:00 i } } • • + + + + » » • 2 5 5 2 2 2 2 » » * * 10:00 * * * * * * i II:UU * • • * * r r + + • • + + 9 9 1 13 7 2 2 4 4 4 4 9 9 1 13 12:PM " " * } } } . . . . + + + + + + 8 8 9 9 9 6 6 5 5 6 6 8 8 9 9 01:00 " " } } » » ► ► r r * * * * 8 8 8 8 2 4 4 6 6 5 5 8 8 8 8 02:00 w w } } } * ' ' • • * * * * * * 1 15 1 17 5 3 3 7 7 1 1 1 15 1 17 03:00 * * ` ` * } r r • • r r r r + + 2 28 2 22 1 9 9 5 5 7 7 2 28 2 22 04:00 * r r } * * * * * * * * * ` ` 2 20 2 27 3 4 4 1 1 7 7 2 20 2 27 05:00 * * • • * ` r r r r • • + + * * 5 5 9 9 4 4 4 3 3 1 1 5 5 9 9 06:00 * * • • ` ` * * * * * * * * ` ` 5 5 4 4 3 0 0 0 0 1 1 5 5 4 4 07:00 * * * * ` ■ » » ` ` * * * * ■ ■ 1 1 8 8 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 1 1 8 8 08:00 + + " " ■ ■ } } r r r r • • 1 1 0 0 1 4 4 1 1 0 0 I I 0 0 09:00 " " * * + + ■ * ' ' * * * * * * 1 1 2 2 I 0 0 1 1 0 0 I I 2 2 10:00 * * * * * • • • w w r rt • • ■ ■ 2 2 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 11:00 + + • • • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 104 1 126 53 6 62 4 42 4 49 1 104 1 126 Totals 0 0 0 0 0 Combined 0 0 . .0 0 0 0 0 2 230 1 115 9 91 1i, 0 0.0 . 0.0 . 0.0 . .0 0 0.0 . .0 a � j 4 i i:q 1(, Split 1 .0 0 .0 0 \M * r r r r + + + + * * 1 11:00 1 11:00 09:00 0 09:00 1 10:00 1 11:00 1 11:00 1 11:00 Peak Hr * *. * * * * + + + + + + • • + + 1 1 7 7 4 6 6 2 2 5 5 I I 7 7 Volume * * * * * PM * * * * * * * * * 0 04:00 0 05:00 01:00 0 04:00 0 03:00 0 04:00 0 04:00 0 05:00 PeakHr * * * * * * * r r r • • r r + + 2 28 2 27 9 9 9 7 7 7 7 2 28 2 27 Volume * * * * * * r f70-3 GL-L N . : 9/ �s o = as Printed : 8/16/2007 Paee Data File : Doncaster Way - 5512 : I Headin2l Heading2 Heading3 Titlel : Doncaster Way - 5512 Site: Date: 08/06/07 Interval Mon.6 Tue 7 Wed 8 Thu 9 Fri 10 Sat 11 Sun 12 Weekday Avg. Begin 4BNB BASB 4BNB BASB 4BNB BASB 4BNB BASB 4BNB BASB 4BNB BASB 4BNB BASB 4BNB BASB AM 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 7 s w s + 0 0 01 :UO it 0 0 U U 0 0 01 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0. 1 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r r s r 0 1 05:00 0 1 0 1 1 2 0 5 1 2 0 7 0 3 06:00 07:00 5 19 1 19 5 23 2 20 9 24 2 22 23 21 26 16 * r + * 23 19 08:00 66 58 67 65 74 70 80 77 63 54 * * ' * 70 64 09:00 30 22 91 18 39 21 29 17 23 13 * * • r * ` + + 30 22 18 30 10:00 24 33 17 27 25 32 24 29 24 33 + " ` * 28 27 11:00 30 29 41 41 40 34 32 31 0 0 12:PM 7 10 16 11 12 10 4 II + + " * * + * • ' + + ' 9 10 10 111 01:00 7 14 11 10 12 11 10 8 + w + + + * 6 12 02:00 7 10 8 16 4 12 7 ' 1 I * i * * * 13 16 03:00 15 11 15 21 15 19 10 15 " ' ' * + + 14 70 04:00 22 13 28 24 18 22 29 22 + i * * * * 45 42 05:00 33 37 68 42 43 44 39 46 + • * i . + + * 14 17 06:00 3 8 38 38 8 12 9 . 11 + * * ' + * 8 13 07:00 0 3 19 36 9 10 6 3 * * * + ' * 3 7 08:00 3 1 5 21 3 6 2 3 * * * * * 3 2 09:00 3 1 3 3 2 5 6 1 10:00 2 3 1 2 0 1 2 5 1_1:00 _ Totals _ _ 1 277 1 275 _ _1 397 0 3 5 0 3 122 0 0 0 0 316 314 399 341 340 317 317 147 ned v 552 796 681 634 269 0 0 630 Split '%, 50.2 40.8 49.9 50.1 50.1 49.9 50.0 50.0 54.6 45.4 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 50.2 49.8 AN Peak Hr 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 08:00 * " ' + 08:00 08:00 Volume 66 58 67, 65 74 70 80 77 63 54 * * * * 70 64 PM I'eakHr (15:OU (15:00 05:00 05:00 05:00 05:00 05:00 05:00 + + + + + + 05:00 05:00 Volume 33 37 68 42 43 44 39 46 + * + i • r 45 42 Data File : Doncaster Way - 5512 Printed : 8/16/2007 Page : 2 Headins:l O e Heading2 ' HeadinO Tidel : Doncasater Way - 5413 Site: Title2 Date: Tit1e3 Direction: /�%p/n`tk.�c�vrv� ` r IV5 Begin Total 1 -14 15 -19 20 -24 25 -29 30 -34 35 -39 40-44 45-49 50 -54 55 -59 60-64 65 -69 70 -99 Time MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH 12:AM • r r • w • • • • • • • s w 01:00 • * + * r r r • r • ■ ► • + 02:00 • • + • + + r s r r ■ r s r 03:00 + + + + + + + • • r • • s w 04:00 • • + + w w • • • r • • s w 05:00 + • + + + • • r r • ■ • • r 06:00 + • r r ■ w r • • r • • s • 07:00 • + * + • * • • • • • r ► + 08:00 + ► r r • ■ r s s • • r r • 09:00 • r • ■ • ■ • • • r • • • • .10:00 + + • * r r • * • • • w ■ r 11:00 15 2 2 5 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:PM 8 0 1 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 7 0 0 1 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 6 0 2 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 9 0 1 2 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 14 0 2 8 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 9 0 0 6 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 8 2 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 8 1 1 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:00 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09:00 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 3 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Daily 92 5 9 32 27 16 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totals Percent 5.4 9.8 34.8 29.3 17.4 3.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 of Total Percentile Speeds 10% 15% 50% 850% 90% 17.8 20.0 25.2 31.9 33.1 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 59 % in pace 64.1 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH Percentage 0.0 0.0 0.0 Totals 0 0 0 Data File : Doncaster Wav - 5413 Printed : 8/17/2007 Page : 1 Headinal Heading2 Heading3 Doncasater Way - 5413 Site: Date: 08/04/07 Title3 Direction: Begin Time Total 1 -14 MPH 15 -19 MPH 20 -24 MPH 25 -29 MPH 30 -34 MPH 35 -39 MPH 40-44 MPH 45-49 MPH 50 -54 MPH 55 -59 MPH 60-64 MPH 65-69 MPH 70 -99 MPH Avg 12:AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 06:00 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 07:00 3 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 08:00 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 09:00 4 0 b 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 10:00 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 11:00 3 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 12:PM 6 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 01:00 12 0 1 9 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 02:00 3 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 03:00 4 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 04:00 5 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 05:00 3 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 06:00 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 07:00 3 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 08:00 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 09:00 3 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 T, "' " 62 4 11 22 19 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 Percent 6.5 17.7 35.5 30.6 9.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 of Total Percentile Speeds 10% 15% 50% 85% 90% 16.4 17.7 23.6 29.2 30.0 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 41 % in pace 66.1 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH Percentage 0.0 0.0 0.0 Totals 0 0 0 Data File: Doncaster Way - 5413 Printed : 8/17/2007 Page : 2 Headingl Heading2 Heading3 Printed : 8/17/2007 Page : 3 Data File: Doncaster Way - 5413 Site: TWO : Doncasater Way - 5413 Date: 08, Tit1e2 Title3 Direction: 20 -24 25 -29 30 -34 35 -39 40-44 45-49 50 -54 55 -59 60-64 65 -69 70 -99 Avg Total 1 -14 IS -19 Begin MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH Time 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 12:AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 02:00 1 0 0 0 l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 05:00 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 08:00 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 09:00 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 10:00 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 12:PM 6 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 01:00 7 0 1 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 02:00 5 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 03:00 7 0 2 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 04:00 4 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 05:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 06:00 6 0 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 07:00 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 08:00• 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 09:00 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 Daily 50 0 16 16 12 Totals 0.0 32.0 32.0 24.0 12.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Percent of Total Percentile Speeds 100/0 15010 500/0 850/6 900% 16.6 17.5 22.8 29.6 30.8 10 MPH Pace Speed : 15-25 Number in pace 32 % in pace 64.0 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH Percentage 0.0 0.0 0.0 Totals 0 0 0 Printed : 8/17/2007 Page : 3 Data File: Doncaster Way - 5413 Headinal Heading2 Heading3 Percent of Total Percentile Speeds 10 MPH Pace Speed Number in pace % in pace Speed Exceeded Percentage Totals 1.2 15.5 32.1 27.4 15.5 6.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 10% 18.1 20-30 50 59.5 45 MPH 1.2 1 15% 19.6 55 MPH 1.2 1 50% 25.2 65 MPH 0.0 0 85% 90% 33.1 34.6 Data File: Doncaster Way - 5413 Printed : 8/17/2007 Page : 4 Doncasater Way - 5413 Site: '1 Date: 08/06/07 .. Title3 Direction: Begin Total 1 -14 15 -19 20 -24 25 -29 30 -34 35 -39 40-44 45-49 50 -54 55 -59 60-64 65 -69 70 -99 Avg MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH Time 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 07:00 1 0 0 1 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 08:00 10 0 0 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 09:00 2 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 10:00 5 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 11:00 9 0 0 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 12:PM 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 01:00 8 0 2 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 02:00 5 0 1 2 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 03:00 9 1 1. 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 04:00 4 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 05:00 7 0 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 29 06:00 7 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 07:00 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 . 08:00 5 0 1 2 1 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 09:00 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 10:00 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 11:00 3 0 0 1 2 23 13 5 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 26 r: 84 1 13 27 Percent of Total Percentile Speeds 10 MPH Pace Speed Number in pace % in pace Speed Exceeded Percentage Totals 1.2 15.5 32.1 27.4 15.5 6.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 10% 18.1 20-30 50 59.5 45 MPH 1.2 1 15% 19.6 55 MPH 1.2 1 50% 25.2 65 MPH 0.0 0 85% 90% 33.1 34.6 Data File: Doncaster Way - 5413 Printed : 8/17/2007 Page : 4 Headinal Heading2 HeadinO Titlel : Doncasater Way - 5413 Site: Date: 08' 7 Title2 Title3 Direction: Begin Total 1 -14 15 -19 20 -24 25 -29 30 -34 35 -39 40-44 45-49 50 -54 55 -59 60-64 65 -69 70 -99 Avg Time MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH 12:AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 07:00 3 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 08:00 3 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 09:00 5 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 10:00 2 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 11:00 10 0 2 1 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 12:PM 11 0 1 3 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 01:00 8 0 0 3 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 02:00 5 0 1 2 .1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 03:00 6 0 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 04:00 6 0 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 05:00 7 0 1 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 06:00 8 1 0 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 07:00 9 0 2 4 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 08:00 6 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 09:00 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 Daily 95 2 14 24 37 14 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 Totals Percent 2.1 14.7 25.3 38..9 14.7 4.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 of Total Percentile Speeds 10 MPH Pace Speed Number in pace % in pace Speed Exceeded Percentage Totals 10% 17.9 20 -30 61 64.2 45 MPH 0.0 0 15% 19.6 55 MPH 0.0 0 50% 26.1 65 MPH 0.0 0 85% 90% 31.4 33.2 Printed : 8/17/2007 Page : 5 Data File: Doncaster Way - 5413 Headind Heading2 Heading3 Doncasater Way - 5413 Site: Date: 08/08/07 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 64 % in pace 62.1 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH percentage 0.0 0.0 0.0 Totals 0 0 0 Data File : Doncaster Way - 5413 Printed : 8/17/2007 Page: 6 TWO Direction: _ Total 1 -14 15 -19 20 -24 25 -29 30 -34 35 -39 40-44 45 -49 50 -54 55 -59 60-64 65-69 70 -99 Avg Begin MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH Time 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 05:00 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 06:00 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 07:00 3 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 08:00 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 09:00 7 0 2 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 10:00 9 0 1 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 11:00 10 0 1 3 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 12:PM 9 0 0 2 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 01:00 7 0 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 02:00 5 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 03:00 9 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 04:00 7 0 4 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 05:00 12 0 0 3 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 06:00 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 07:00 6 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 08:00 6 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 09:00 3 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 10:00 1 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 11:00 2 0 0 0 29 0 35 20 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 103 3 12 2.9 11.7 28.2 34.0 19.4 3.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Percent of Total Percentile Speeds 10% 150/0 50% 85% 90% 18.3 20.2 26.1 32.3 33.5 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 64 % in pace 62.1 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH percentage 0.0 0.0 0.0 Totals 0 0 0 Data File : Doncaster Way - 5413 Printed : 8/17/2007 Page: 6 Headind Heading2 Heading3 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 60 % in pace 66.7 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH Percentage 0.0 0.0 0.0 Totals 0 0 0 Printed : 8/17/2007 Page. 7 Site: TWO : Doncasater Way - 5413 Date: 08/f Title2 Direction: Title3 30 35 -39 40-44 45-49 50 -54 55 -59 60 -64 65 69 70 -99 Avg Begin Total 1 -14 15 -19 20 -24 25 29 -34 MPH MPH MPH MPHO MPHp MP O MP O MP 0 Time MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH 0 p 0 12:AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 p p 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p p p 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 07:00 2 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 08:00 4 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 25 09:00 5 0 1 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 23 10:00 6 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 11:00 3 0• 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 .0 0 p p p 0 21 12:PM 6 1 1 1 3 2 0 p p 0 0 p p 0 26 01:00 10 0 1 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 p p p 0 27 02:00 1 0 0 0 1 2 p p 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 03:00 7 0 0 2 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 04:00 9 0 1 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 05:00 10 0 0 6 1 2 1 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 27 06:00 8 0 0 1 6 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 07:00 7 0 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 p p 0 p 0 27 08:06 4 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 09:00 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 23 10:00 4 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 17 4 0 0 0 0 -0 p p 26 Daily 90 3 6 27 33 Totals 6.7 30.0 36.7 18.9 4.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pent 3.3 of Total Percentile Speeds 100 /U 15% 500%, 850/6 900/0 20.2 20.9 26.4 32.4 33.5 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 60 % in pace 66.7 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH Percentage 0.0 0.0 0.0 Totals 0 0 0 Printed : 8/17/2007 Page. 7 Headinal Heading2 Heading3 Doncasater Way - 5413 Site: Date: 08/10/07 Title3 Direction: Begin Total 1 -14 15 -19 20 -24 25 -29 30 -34 35 -39 40-44 45-49 50 -54 55 -59. 60 -64 65 -69 70 -99 Avg Time MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH 12:AM 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 01:00 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 07:00 5 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 08:00 9 0 2 1 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 09:00 8 0 0 4 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 10:00 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:PM + + • ► r r r ■ r • r r r i • 01:00 r ► • • • ■ + ■ • r r r ► i f 02:00 f + ■ i r ■ + i i r f r ■ s 03:00 * • + ■ r • i i r r i • i i i 04:00 + + i r r r r r f i f • r i f 05:00 • i • r r ■ ■ r r ■ # r ■ ■ ■ 06:00 + i r ■ r r f ■ f ■ r ■ i # f 07:00 + i i i r i i ■ i i r • ■ i ■ 08:00 + • • • ■ r • r # • • ■ • • • 09:00 + + + + ■ ► + # ► r ■ i i # • 10:00 + r r r ■ ■ ■ r r • ► • # r i 11:00 + # + ■ r f i i f ■ r i i ■ ■ I•-" 26 0 3 10 8 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 Percent 0.0 11.5 38.5 30.8 11.5 7.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 of Total Percentile Speeds 100/0 1501. 500/. 85% 90% 20.0 20.5 25.6 33.3 35.0 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 18 % in pace 69.2 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH Percentage 0.0 0.0 0.0 Totals 0 0 0 Data File: Doncaster Way - 5413 Printed : 8/17/2007 Page : 8 Percentile Speeds 10% 15% 50% 85% 90% 10.3 15.0 23.3 30.0 31.8 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 44 % in pace 57.1 Speed Exceeded -45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH Percentage 0.0 0.0 0.0 Totals 0 0 0 Data File: Doncaster Way - 5413 Printed : 8/17/2007 Page : 1 Headind Heading2 Heading3 Titlel : Doncasater Way - 5413 Site: Title2 Date: 0; R Title3 Direction: SOV�GU Begin Total 1 -14 15 -19 20 -24 25 -29 30 -34 35 -39 40-44 45 -49 50 -54 55 -59 6W 65-69 70 -99 Avg Time MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH 12:AM + r • • w r r + r r i r ■ + 01:00 • + s r r r • • • ■ ► i s • ■ 02:00 ■ • ■ ■ r • • r s • ■ i ► • • 03:00 r r r s w r r r i • r • r r i 04:00 + ■ • • • ■ • i ■ w • . ■ ■ • 05:00 i • • w • r i s r • + ■ + i 06:00 r • • w • • • ► • w r r • ► • 07:00 r • • s • ■ • r i • w • • ■ s 08:00 + + r • r ■ r r s • • r r s 09:00 ► ► • w w ■ w • ■ r w • r ■ w 10:00 ■ ■ i i • r ■ • ■ r • • ■ + 11:00 8 1 0 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 12:PM 9 0. 2 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 01:00 10 2 0 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 02:00 5 0 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 03:00 6 1 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 04:00 5 0 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 05:00 6 1 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 06:00 8 2 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 07:00 5 1 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 08:00 12 3 1 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 09:00 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 10:00 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Daily 77 12 10 26 18 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 Totals Percent 15.6 13.0 33.8 23.4 14.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 of Total Percentile Speeds 10% 15% 50% 85% 90% 10.3 15.0 23.3 30.0 31.8 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 44 % in pace 57.1 Speed Exceeded -45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH Percentage 0.0 0.0 0.0 Totals 0 0 0 Data File: Doncaster Way - 5413 Printed : 8/17/2007 Page : 1 Headinal Heading2 Headinj3 Percent 6.1 21.2 31.8 34.8 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 of Total Percentile Speeds 10% 15% 500/6 85% 90% 16.1 17.1 23.6 28.9 29.6 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 44 % in pace 66.7 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH Percentage 0.0 0.0 0.0 Totals 0 0 0 r,., «., R:1a • rl —nctP Wnv - 54 1 •i Printed : 8/17/2007 Page : 2 Doncasater Way - 5413 Site: Date: 08/04/07 t .ue2 Title3 Direction: Begin Total 1 -14 15 -19 20 -24 25 -29 30 -34 35 -39 40-44 45-49 50 -54 55 -59 60-64 65 -69 70 -99 Avg Time MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH 12:AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 08:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09:00 11 0 2 5 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 10:00 6 1 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 11:00 3 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 12:PM 4 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 01:00 6 1 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 02:00 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 03:00 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 04:00 10 1 4 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 05:00 3 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 06:00 3 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 07:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:00 5 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 09:00 5 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 10:00 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 11:00 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 66 4 14 21 23 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 Percent 6.1 21.2 31.8 34.8 3.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 of Total Percentile Speeds 10% 15% 500/6 85% 90% 16.1 17.1 23.6 28.9 29.6 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 44 % in pace 66.7 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH Percentage 0.0 0.0 0.0 Totals 0 0 0 r,., «., R:1a • rl —nctP Wnv - 54 1 •i Printed : 8/17/2007 Page : 2 Headinal Heading2 Heading3 Titlel : Doncasater Way - 5413 Site: 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 39 % in pace 68.4 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH Percentage 0.0 0.0 0.0 Totals 0 0 0 Data File: Doncaster Way - 5413 Printed: 8/17/2007 Page : 3 Date: 08/( Title2 Title3 Direction: Begin Total 1 -14 15 -19 20 -24 25 -29 30 -34 35 -39 40-44 4549 50 -54 55 -59 60 -64 65-69 70 -99 Avg Time MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH _ 12:AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 04:00 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:00 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 09:00 3 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 10:00 3 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 11:00 3 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 12:PM 3 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 01:00 5 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 02:00 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 03:00 4 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 04:00 6 0 0 0 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 05:00 9 0 0 1 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 06:00 5 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 07:00 3 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 08:00 3 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 09:00 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 10:00 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Daily 57 1 11 18 21 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 Totals Percent 1.8 19.3 31.6 36.8 8.8 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 of Total Percentile Speeds 10% 15% 500% 85% 900/0 17.3 18.6 24.7 29.5 31.0 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 39 % in pace 68.4 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH Percentage 0.0 0.0 0.0 Totals 0 0 0 Data File: Doncaster Way - 5413 Printed: 8/17/2007 Page : 3 Headinal Heading2 HeadinO 1 : Doncasater Way - 5413 Site: Date: 08/06/07 Title2 Title3 Direction: Begin Total 1 -14 15 -19 20 -24 25 -29 30 -34 35 -39 40-44 45-49 50 -54 55 -59 60-64 65-69 70 -99 Avg Time MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH 12:AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 06:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 07:00 6 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 08:00 10 0 0 1 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 09:00 6 1 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 10:00 7 0 0 0 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 11:00 7 0 0 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 12:PM 8 0 2 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 01:00 10 2 2 1 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 19 02:00 5 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 03:00 5 1 0 0 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 04:00 3 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 05:00 8 0 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 06:00 4 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 07:00 5 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 08:00 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 09:00 4 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 10:00 4 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 11:00 1 97 0 0 6 17 1 19 42 10 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 Percent 6.2 17.5 19.6 43.3 10.3 2.1 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 of Total Percentile Speeds 100% 150/. 5001. 85% 90% 16.2 17.6 25.8 29.9 32.0 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 61 % in pace 62.9 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH Percentage 0.0 0.0 0.0 Totals 0 0 0 8/17/2007 Page : 4 Headinal Headi=2 Heading3 Titlel : Doncasater Way - 5413 Site: Title2 Date: U 7 Tide3 Direction: Begin Total 1 -14 15 -19 20 -24 25 -29 30 -34 35 -39 40-44 45 -49 50 -54 55 -59 60-64 65 -69 70 -99 Avg Time MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH 12:AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 27 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 5 0 1 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 08:00 9 1 0 2 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 09:00 6 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 10:00 6 2 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 11:00 9 0 1 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 12:PM 9 1 3 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 19 01:00 9 0 4 2 2, 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 02:00 7 0 2 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 03:00 8 1 2 0 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 04:00 9 0 1 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 05:00 8 0 0 2 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 06:00 5 2 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 07:00 5 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 08:00 11 1 4 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 09:00 3 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 10:00 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Daily 112 9 19 26 44 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 Totals Percent 8.0 17.0 23.2 39.3 10.7 1.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 of Total Percentile Speeds 100/0 15% 50% 85% 90% 15.8 17.1 25.2 29.8 31.3 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 70 % in pace 62.5 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH Percentage 0.0 0.0 0.0 Totals 0 0 0 Mtn File : Doncaster Wav - 5413 Printed : 8/17/2007 Page: 5 Headinel Heading2 Heading3 Doncasater Way - 5413 Site: Date: 08/08/07 Title3 Direction: Begin Total 1 -14 15 -19 20-24 25 -29 30 -34 35 -39 40-44 45-49 50 -54 55 -59 60 -64 65 -69 70 -99 Avg Time MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH i2-AM 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 01:00 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 06:00 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 07:00 6 0 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 08:00 9 0 0 2 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 09:00 7 1 1 1 3 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 10:00 8 1 1 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 11:00 9 0 1 1 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 12:PM 9 1 2 1 3 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 01:00 7 0 0 2 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 02:00 7 1 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 03:00 10 1 2 4 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 04:00 8 0 3 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 05:00 18 0 4 4 8 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 06:00 5 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 07:00 11 2 1 5 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 08:00 6 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 09:00 3 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 10:00 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 11:00 4 0 0 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 Da+1v 134 8 24 33 47 17 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 Percent 6.0 17.9 24.6 35.1 12.7 3.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 of Total Percentile Speeds 100/0 15010 50% 85% 900/6 16.3 17.7 25.2 30.6 32.6 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 80 % in pace 59.7 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH Percentage 0.0 0.0 0.0 Totals 0 0 0 Data File: Doncaster Way - 5413 Printed : 8/1712007 Page : 6 Headinal Heading2 Heading3 Titlel : Doncasater Way - 5413 Site: Date: 08/ Title2 Title3 Direction: Begin Total 1 -14 15 -19 20 -24 25 -29 30 -34 35 -39 40-44 45-49 50 -54 ' 55 -59 60-64 65 -69 70 -99 AvR Time MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH 12:AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 06:00 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 07:00 5 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 08:00 11 0 1 2 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 09:00 4 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 24 10:00 10 0 3 1 4 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 11:00 7 0 2 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 12:PM 9 1 1 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 01:00 8 1 4 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 02:00 4 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 03:00 6 1 0 2 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 04:00 8 0 1 1 3 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 05:00 10 0 3 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 06:00 6 0 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 07:00 3 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 08:00 3 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 09:00 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 10:00 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 11:00 3 0 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 34 Daily 107 5 17 29 33 16 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 -O 25 Totals Percent 4.7 15.9 27.1 30.8 15.0 6.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 of Total Percentile Speeds 100% 150/. 50% 85% 900/0 16.8 18.5 25.5 32.2 34.1 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 62 % in pace 57.9 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH Percentage 0.0 0.0 0.0 Totals 0 0 0 Data File: Doncaster Way - 5413 Printed : 8/17/2007 Page : 7 Headinal Heading2 HeadinO Percent 7.7 12.8 20.5 35.9 17.9 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.0 of Total Percentile Speeds 100/0 15% 50% 85% 90% 16.0 18.0 26.4 32.9 34.3 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 22 % in pace 56.4 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH Percentage 2.6 2.6 2.6 Totals 1 1 1 Data File: Doncaster Way - 5413 Printed : 8/17/2007 Page : 8 Doncasater Way - 5413 Site: Date: 08/10/07 i ...c2 Title3 Direction: Begin Total 1 -14 15 -19 20 -24 25 -29 30 -34 35 -39 40-44 45-49 50 -54 55 -59 60 -64 65-69 70 -99 Avg Time MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH 12:AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ! 06:00 3 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 07:00 8 1 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 28 08:00 13 1 1 2 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 09:00 8 0 0 3 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 10:00 5 0 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:PM * • ■ s rt • + • • r r r ► r • ■ r • rt r r 01:00 * • * * * ■ • • • • s • r • ■ 02:00 * * w ■ + ■ ■ • ■ • ► • ■ ■ + * ■ • 03:00 + * r ■ • s ■ s r r • ■ ■ r • rt ■ • 04:00 • * + • w ■ rt • ■ s ■ • rt ■ ■ ■ 05:00 ■ w • ■ r ■ r • ■ r rt ■ ■ • 06:00 * * w rt r r rt ■ ■ r ■ r r 07:00 * • rt r r ■ • ► ■ ■ s • ■ • ■ • ■ • • ■ 08:00 09:00 * * + ► • ■ • r • • r ■ r • ► • r r • s 10:00 + ■ * • r s • • ■ • ■ r r r ■ s 11:00 • r ■ ■ ■ ■ * 1 ■ 0 • 0 0 0 0 1 0 25 - 39 3 5 8 14 7 Percent 7.7 12.8 20.5 35.9 17.9 2.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.6 0.0 of Total Percentile Speeds 100/0 15% 50% 85% 90% 16.0 18.0 26.4 32.9 34.3 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 22 % in pace 56.4 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH Percentage 2.6 2.6 2.6 Totals 1 1 1 Data File: Doncaster Way - 5413 Printed : 8/17/2007 Page : 8 Headind : Doncaster Way - 5512 Heading2 Heading3 / Titlel : Doncaster Way - 5512 Site: Titlel Date: 0L 17 Title3 Direction: ABNB /Vow3pvw Begin Total 1 -14 15 -19 20 -24 25 -29 30 -34 35 -39 40-44 4549 50 -54 55 -59 60 -64 65 -69 70 -99 Avg Time MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH 12:AM r • i r i • • r ■ ► r • i r r 01:00 • • + • • • r + • • + • + + • 02:00 + • • r • r • r r • • ■ r i r 03:00 + r a r • # + r • + + " ■ • ■ 04 :00 + # • r • r i i i • • ■ r + • 05:00 + # # • i • ► r ■ r # ► • ■ r 06:00 + • r r ■ r r • r • r ■ • ■ • 07:00 + r • r r • r ■ . • i r • • ■ # 08:00 • + + + • r • ■ r ■ • r • r r 09:00 + + • i i r r • r • r r r i • 10:00 + • + + + + + + + + r • r r r 11:00 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 12:PM 9 0 0 4 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 29 01:00 8 1 1 3 1 2 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 02:00 8 2 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 03:00 15 1 3 5 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 04:00 28 0 6 13 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 05:00 20 1 2 9 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 06:00 5 0 1 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 07:00 5 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 08:00 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 09:00 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 •0 0 22 10:00 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 22 11:00 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 Daily 104 5 15 44 30 9 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 23 Totals Percent 4.8 14.4 42.3 28.8 8.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 of Total Percentile Speeds 10 MPH Pace Speed Number in pace % in pace Speed Exceeded Percentage Totals 10% 17.0 20-30 '74 71.2 45 MPH 1.0 1 15% 18.7 55 MPH 1.0 1 50% 23.6 65 MPH 0.0 0 85% 90% 29.2 30.0 rata File: Doncaster Wav - 5512 Printed : 8/17/2007 Page : 1 HeadinEl Heading2 Heading3 Printed: 8/17/2007 Page Site: 1 : Doncaster Way - 5512 Date: 08/04/07 Title2 Direction: ABNB Title3 15 20 -24 25 -29 30 -34 35 -39 404 45 -09 50 -54 55 -59 60-64 65 -69 70 -99 Avg Begin Total 1 -14 -]9 MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH 0 Time 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12M 0 :A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 03:00 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 07:00 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 08:00 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 09:00 4 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 10:00 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 11:00 3 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 12 :PM 7 1 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 01:00 9 0 1 5 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 02:00 2 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2s 03:00 5 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 05:00 3 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 2 06:00 4 0 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 5 07:00 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 08:00 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 09:00 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 10:00 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 '1:00 2 0 0_ 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 53 3 8 21 18 3 5.7 15.1 39.6 34.0 5.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 percent of Total Percentile Speeds 100/1, 15% 5001. 85% 900/0 16.9 18.1 23.8 28.9 29.4 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 39 % in pace 73.6 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH Percentage 0.0 0.0 0.0 Totals 0 0 0 Printed: 8/17/2007 Page Headinal Heading2 Heading3 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 30 % in pace 71.4 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH Percentage 0.0 0.0 0.0 Totals 0 0 0 n.ta File • Dnncaster Wav - 5512 Printed : 8/17/2007 Page: 3 Site: Titlel : Doncaster Way - 5512 Date: 08A Title2 Direction: ABNB Title3 1 15 -19 20 -24 25 -29 30 -34 35 -39 40-44 45-49 50 -54 55 -59 60 -64 65-69 70 -99 Avg Begin Total -14 MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH Time 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 0 0 12:AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 02:00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 08:00 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 09:00 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 10:00 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 11:00 1 0 1 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 :PM 12 :PM 4 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 5 0 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .24 02:00 6 0 1 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 03:00 7 2 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 04:00 5 0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 06:00 3 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 08:00 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 09:00 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 10:00 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 Daily 42 5 5 16 14 2 Totals 11.9 11.9 38.1' 33.3 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Percent of Total Percentile Speeds. 10% 15% 500/6 85% 900% 15.0 17.0 23.4 28.6 29.3 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 30 % in pace 71.4 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH Percentage 0.0 0.0 0.0 Totals 0 0 0 n.ta File • Dnncaster Wav - 5512 Printed : 8/17/2007 Page: 3 Headind Heading2 HeadinR3 Percent of Total 2.5 10.8 44.8 35.4 5.8 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 Percentile Speeds 10% 18.5 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 222 % in pace 80.1 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH Site: 0.4 Totals 1 Z : Doncaster Way - 5512 Date: 08/06/07 Title2 . Direction: ABNB Title3 20 25 -29 30 -34 35 -39 40-44 45 49 50 -54 55 -59 60-64 65 -69 70 -99 Avg . Begin Total 1 -14 15 -19 -24 MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH Time MPH MPH MPH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :A 12M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 p p 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 06:00 5 0 1 1 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 07:00 19 0 1 g g 2 1 0 0 p 0 0 0 1 25 08:00 66 2 4 28 28 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 24 09:00 30 0 4 13 10 3 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 22 10:00 24 1 4 11 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 23 11:00 30 1 4 16 8 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 12:PM 7 0 0 3 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 01:00 7 0 1 4 2 0 0 p p 0 0 0 0 0 23 02:00 7 0 1 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 03:00 15 3 2 7 1 2 0 p p 0 0 0 0 0 24 04:00 22 0 1 12 8 1 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 23 05:00 33 0 4 17 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 06:00 3 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 p p 0 0 0 9 07:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 08:00 3 0 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 09:00 3 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 p p 0 0 24 10:00 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 p p p 27 11:00 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 277 7 30 124 98 16 Percent of Total 2.5 10.8 44.8 35.4 5.8 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 Percentile Speeds 10% 18.5 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 222 % in pace 80.1 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH Percentage 0.4 Totals 1 15% 20.2 55 MPH 0.4 1 50% 24.1 65 MPH 0.4 1 85% 90% 28.8 29.5 Printed : 8/17/2007 Page : 4 Headinal HeadinR2 HeadinR3 Titlel : Doncaster Way - 5512 Site: Date: 08, 7 Title2 Title3 Direction: ABNB 1 -14 15 -19 20 -24 25 -29 30 -34 35 -39 40-44 45 -49 50 -54 55 -59 60-64 65-69 70 -99 Avg Total Begin Time MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH 12:AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 2. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 06:00 5 0 1 1 1 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 07:00 23 0 3 3 12 9 24 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 08:00 67 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 09:00 31 6 5 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 10:00 17 0 1 7 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 11:00 41 0 8 18 14 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 12:PM 16 0 2 6 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 01:00 11 1 2 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 02:00 8 1 1 4 1 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 03:00 15 1 2 6 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 04:00 28 0 0 10 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 05:00 68 0 3 27 34 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 06:00 38 0 4 15 15 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 07:00 19 1 2 14 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 08:00 5 0 0 3 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 09:00 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 10:00 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 11:00 1 0 0 13 46 0 163 143 31 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 Daily 397 Totals 3.3 11.6 41.1 36.0 7.8 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Percent of Total Percentile Speeds 100/0 150/6 50% 85% 90% 17.9 20.0 24.3 29.1 29.8 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 306 % in Pace 77.1 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH Percentage 0.0 0.0 0.0 Totals 0 0 0 Data File : Doncaster Way - 5512 Printed : 8/17/2007 Page : 5 Headinal Heading2 Heading3 Percent of Total 2.3 11.4 38.7 40.2 6.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 Percentile Speeds 100/0 18.5 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 269 % in pace 78.9 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH Site: 0.6 Totals 2 Way - 5512 :Doncaster Date: 08/08/07 Title2 Direction: ABNB Title3 20 25 -29 30 -34 35 -39 40-44 45-49 50 -54 55 -59 60 -64 65 -69 70 -99 Avg Begin Total 1 -14 15 -19 -24 MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH Time MPH MPH 0 0 0 12:AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 p p 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 17 05:00 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 06:00 9 0 0 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 07:00 24 0 2 11 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 08:00 74 0 5 26 38 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 25 09:00 39 0 5 11 19 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 10:00 25 1 1 14 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 11:00 40 1 6 21 7 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 12-.PM 12 1 2 2 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 01:00 12 0 1 8 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 02:00 4 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 03:00 15 0 1 6 g p 0 0 0 0 p p 0 0 23 04:00 18 1 3 5 9 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 23 05:00 43 1 6 18 18 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 06:00 8 1 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 07:00 9 1 2 1 5 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 24 08:00 3 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 09:00 2 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 p p 0 0 24 ' :00 3 0 0 2 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 24 341 8 39 132 137 21 Percent of Total 2.3 11.4 38.7 40.2 6.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 Percentile Speeds 100/0 18.5 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 269 % in pace 78.9 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH Percentage 0.6 Totals 2 15 °/a 20.2 55 MPH 0.6 2 50% 24.7 65 MPH 0.6 2 85°/, 90% 29.1 29.7 Printed : 8/17/2007 Page : 6 Headinel Heading2 Heading3 Printed 88/17/2007 Page : 7 ...._ r:i., . ilnnroctx Wav - 5512 Site: ritlel : Doncaster Way - 5512 Date: 08 /C Title2 Direction: ABNB Title3 25 30 -34 35 -39 40-44 45 -49 50-54 55 -59 60-64 65 -69 70 -99 Begin Total 1 -14 15 -19 20 -24 -29 MPH MPH MPHO MPHp MPH MP H MPH MPH MPH Time MPH MPH MPH MPH 0 p 0 0 0 0 12:AM 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 p p 0 0 p 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p p 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 O � 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 5 0 1 9 11 2 0 A 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 23 1 3 20 50 6 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 08:00 80 0 2 16 9 2 0 p p 0 0 0 0 0 09:00 29 2 2 11 9 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 10:00 24 11:00 32 0 10 16 6 0 p 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 12:PM 4 0 0 3 1 3 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 01:00 10 0 2 5 2 1 0 0 0 p p 0 0 0 0 02:00 7 0 0 4 2 6 1 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 10 0 1 2 15 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 29 1 0 2 16 17 4 0 0 p p 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 39 9 0 1 3 3 2 0 0 0 p p 0 0 0 06:00 07:00 6 0 0 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:00 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09:00 6 0 0 2 3 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 0 0 0 4 28 138 19 1 p p 0 0 0 Daily 317 .127 Totals 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.3 8.8 40.1 43.5 6.0 Percent of Total Percentile Speeds 100/0 150/6 500/0 850/6 900% 20.0 20.6 25.0 29.0 29.6 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in Pace 265 in pace 83.6 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH Percentage 0.0 0.0 0.0 Totals 0 0 0 Printed 88/17/2007 Page : 7 ...._ r:i., . ilnnroctx Wav - 5512 Headinel Heading2 Heading3 8/10/07 Avg 27 0 32 0 0 0 23 23 24 27 24 0 s s s • s • s s s r Printed : 8/17/2007 Page: 8 Site: Ti : Doncaster Way - 5512 Date: 0 Title2 Direction: ABNB TAW Begin Total 1 -14 15 19 M H MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH . MPH MPH Time MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH 0 0 0 p p p 0 0 12:AM 3 0 0 . 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 p 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 02:00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 03:00 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 p 0 0 p p 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 p p 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 06:00 7 0 1 4 10 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 26 63 0 10 22 26 4 1 p 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 08:00 09:00 23 0 3 7 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 10:00 24 1 2 9 11 p 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 s 0 s 0 s 11:00 0 0 0 0 , s • * r s s * + * s 12:PM s s , s + ■ s � + s + , s * + 01:00 * " + , s * * ■ " * + * ■ , s 02:00 , 03:00 ' ■ s * * s " + " ■ " " , s s , 04:00 " * s s , , s + * " ` ■ + , s 05:00 " # * , s * * " * + , ■ 06:00 " + ■ , s + ■ " * * , s " 07:00 F " y 08:00 + , s s • + * • " * * , s s 09:00 , , 10:00 s •00 " " • p p 0 0 1 0 0 147 2 19 53 58 13 1 39.5 8.8 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7 0.0 0.0 Percent 1.4 12.9 36.1 of Total 100/0 150/. 500/6 850/. 900/6 Percentile Speeds 18.4 20.2 25.0 29.4 30.4 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 111 % in pace 75.5 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH 0.7 0.7 0.0 Percentage 0 Totals 1 1 8/10/07 Avg 27 0 32 0 0 0 23 23 24 27 24 0 s s s • s • s s s r Printed : 8/17/2007 Page: 8 Headinal Heading2 Heading3 Titlel : Doncaster Way - 5512 Site: Date: Of 17 Title2 Sp Title3 Direction: BASB V�� Begin T0 ts] 1 -14 15 -19 20 -24 25 -29 30 -34 35 -39 40-44 45-49 50 -54 55 -59 60-64 65-69 70 -99 Avg Time MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH , MPH MPH MPH MPH 12:AM + + * * • + + r • i r • + r r ■ i 01:00 + + ■ r # r ■ • ■ r • • r r w ■ ■ 02:00 * + * ■ * # ■ + • ■ r w ■ • • • ■ ■ 03:00 ■ ■ ■ + ■ ■ • ■ i • i • • w • r ■ + r ■ r 04 :00 ■ r r r • ■ r r • ■ # ■ # ■ 05:00 06:00 ■ • + ■ ■ + • # r ■ • # # • r + • 07:00 * * w r r w w r ■ i r i • r ■ 08:00 + • + + * ■ • r r • w * • ■ + 09:00 ■ ■ ■ • r • r • • w • • • # r 10:00 • + ► r r r + • ■ r ■ ■ r • • 11:00 7 1 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 12:PM 13 0 2 5 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 01:00 9 0 1 4 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 02:00 8 1 0 1 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 03:00 17 1 2 8 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 04:00 22 0 2 12 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 05:00 27 0 7 12 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 06:00 9 0 1 4 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 07:00 4 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 08:00 8 0 1 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 09:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Daily 126 3 19 53 37 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 Totals Percent 2.4 15.1 42.1 29.4 9.5 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 of Total Percentile Speeds 10% 15% 500/0 850/. 90% 17.6 19.2 23.9 29.5 30.8 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 90 % in pace 71.4 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH Percentage 0.0 0.0 0.0 Totals 0 0 0 Data File: Doncaster Wav - 5512 Printed : 8/17/2007 Page : 1 Headinal Heading2 Heading3 Ti : Doncaster Way - 5512 Site: Date: 08/04/07 Title2 Title3 Direction: BASB Begin Total 1 -14 15 -19 20 -24 25 -29 30 -34 35 -39 40-44 45-49 50 -54 55 -59 60 -64 65 -69 70 -99 Avg Time MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH _ 12:AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 03:00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 07:00 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 08:00 2 0 1 0 0 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 09:00 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 10:00 5 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 11:00 5 0 1 4 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 12:PM 2 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 01:00 6 0 1. 4 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 02:00 4 0 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 03:00 3 0 0 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 04:00 9 0 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 05:00 4 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 06:00 4 0 0 -2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 08:00 3 0 0 1 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 09:00 4 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 11-00 2 0 0 1 1 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 D 62 1 7 23 21 7 T% Percent 1.6 11.3 37.1 33.9 11.3 3.2 1.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 of Total Percentile Speeds 100/6 150/. 500/. 85% 900%. 19.3 20.4 25.2 30.7 32.9 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 44 % in pace 71.0 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH Percentage 0.0 0.0 0.0 Totals 0 0 0 __ ,-_,_ . -_ 11T.., cc, l Printed : 8/17/2007 Page: 2 HeadinSl Heading2 HeadinO 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 33 % in pace 67.3 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH Percentage 0.0 0.0 0.0 Totals 0 0 0 Printed : 8/17/2007 Page : 3 r�...., caP • ilnncacter Wav - 5512 Site: TWO : Doncaster Way - 5512 08/ Date: Title2 Direction: BASB Title3 25 30 -34 35 -39 40-04 45 9 50 -54 55 -59 60-64 65 -69 70 -99 Avg Begin Total 1 -14 15 -19 20 -24 -29 MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPHO Time MPH MPH MPH MPH 0 0 p p O p 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 01:00 1 0 0 0 p p 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 p 0 p p 0 32 03:00 1 0 0 0 0 p p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 04:00 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 p p 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 17 06:00 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 p p 0 0 0 0 32 08:00 2 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 32 09:00 2 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 10:00 2 0 0 1 1 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 11:00 5 0 1 3 1 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 21 12:PM 4 1 0 1 2 1 0 p p 0 0 0 0 0 20 01:00 6 2 0 1 2 1 0 0 p p 0 0 0 0 21 02:00 5 1 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 03:00 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 04:00 7 0 1 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 05:00 7 0 0 3 4 0 0 p p p 0 0' 0 0 27 06:00 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 p p 0 0 22 07:00 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 30 08:00 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 p p 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 Daily 49 5 3 14 19 4 Totals 10.2 6.1 28.6 38.8 8.2 8.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Percent of Total Percentile Speeds 100/0 150% 500/61 85% 900%, 150 20.0 25.8 31.3 35.0 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 33 % in pace 67.3 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH Percentage 0.0 0.0 0.0 Totals 0 0 0 Printed : 8/17/2007 Page : 3 r�...., caP • ilnncacter Wav - 5512 Headinal Heading2 Heading3 Percent of Total 2.2 13.1 46.5 32.0 4.0 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 Percentile Speeds : Doncaster Way - 5512 18.1 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 216 % in pace Site: Speed Exceeded 45 MPH Percentage 0.7 Totals 2 Date: 08/06/07 Title2 Title3 Direction: BASB Total 1 -14 15 -19 20 -24 25 -29 30 -34 35 -39 40-44 45 -49 50 -54 55 -59 60-64 65-69 70 -99 Avg Begin MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH Time 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 06:00 1 0 0 1 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 07:00 19 0 2 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 24 08:00 58 0 9 28 18 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 09:00 22 0 3 9 7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 10:00 33 0 5 14 13 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 11:00 29 1 7 18 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 12:PM 10 0 2 5 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 01:00 14 0 4 5 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 02:00 10 1 .0 3 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 31 03:00 11 1 0 3 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 04:00 13 0 0 9 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 05:00 37 1 4 22 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 06:00 8 0 0 1 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 07:00 3 0 0 1 2 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:00 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 09:00 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 3 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 11:00 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 24 275 6 36 128 88 11 Percent of Total 2.2 13.1 46.5 32.0 4.0 0.7 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.4 Percentile Speeds 100/0 18.1 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 216 % in pace 78.5 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH Percentage 0.7 Totals 2 15% 20.0 55 MPH 0.7 2 50% 23.8 65 MPH 0.7 2 85% 90% 28.6 29.4 .. _ ..,_.. «, � I Printed: 8/17/2007 Page : 4 Headinal Heading2 Heading3 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 312 % in pace 78.2 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH Percentage 0.8 0.3 0.3 Totals 3 1 1 Printed : 8/17/2007 Page : 5 Data File: Doncaster Way - 5512 Site: Titlel : Doncaster Way -5512 08/ Date: Title2 Direction: BASB ; Title3 20 25 -29 30 -34 35 -39 40-44 45-49 50 -54 55 -59 60 -64 65 -69 70 -99 Avg Begin Total 1 -14 15 -19 -24 MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MP0 MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH. Time MPH MPH MPH 0 0 0. 0 12:AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 02:00 1 0 0 0 1 0 p 0 0 0 p. p 0 0 0 0 03:00 0. 0 0 p 0 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p p 0 0 0 ' 05:00 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 06:00 2 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 26 07:00 20 0 2 8 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 08:00 65 0 7 37 21 0 0 1 0 0 0 p 0 0 23 09:00 18 1 4 6 5 1 1 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 22 10:00 27 3 2 14. 6 1' 0 0 p p. 0 0 0 0 21 11:00 41 3 10 17 10 1 0 0 p 0 p 0 0 0 23 12:PM 11 1 2 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22. 01:00 10 0 2 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 02:00 16 0 2 6 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 03:00 21 1 2 9 6 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0• 25 04:00 24 0 4 7 9 2 0 p p 0 0 0 0 1 ,. 25 05:00 42 1 0 22 18 0 0 1 .0 0 0 0 0 25 06:00 38 0 4 16 15 2 0 1 0 p 0 0 0 0 0 23 07:00 36 0 6 23 5 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 08:00 21 1 1 13 4 1 0 p 0 0 0 p 0 p 0 29 09:00 3 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 p 0 0 0 0, 0 27 10:00 2 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 2 1 1 0 0 0 l 24 Daily 399 12 48 189 123 16 Totals 3.0 12.0 47.4 30.8 4.0 1.5 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.0 0,0 0.0 0.3 Percent of Total Percentile Speeds 100/6 15% 50% 850/6 900/. 179 20.0 23.7 28.7 29.5 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 312 % in pace 78.2 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH Percentage 0.8 0.3 0.3 Totals 3 1 1 Printed : 8/17/2007 Page : 5 Data File: Doncaster Way - 5512 M Headinal HeadinR2 HeadinQ3 Percent of Total 0.6 15.3 47.9 30.9 3.5 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.3 Percentile Speeds Doncaster Way - 5512 18.1 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 268 % in pace Site: Speed Exceeded 45 MPH Percentage 0.9 Totals 3 Date: 08/08/07 Title2 Title3 Direction: BASB Begin Total 1 -14 15 -19 20 -24 25 -29 30 -34 35 -39 40-44 45 -49 50 -54 55 -59 60-64 65-69 70 -99 Avg Time MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH 12:AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18 06:00 2 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 07:00 22 0 4 8 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 08:00 70 0 5 35 27 1 0 0 _ 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 25 26 09:00 21 0 0 12 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 22 10:00 32 0 10 15 6 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 11:00 34 0 7 17 9 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 12:PM 10 1 0 6 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 01:00 11 0 1 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 02:00 12 0 3 7 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 03:00 19 0 1 11 5 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 04:00 22 0 7 6 7 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 05:00 44 0 7 27 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 06:00 12 0 1 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 07:00 10 0 3 2 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 08:00 6 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 26 09:00 5 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 10:00 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 27 _ 11:00 5 340 0 2 1 52 0 163 2 105 12 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 1 24 Percent of Total 0.6 15.3 47.9 30.9 3.5 0.6 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.3 Percentile Speeds 10% 18.1 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 268 % in pace 78.8 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH Percentage 0.9 Totals 3 M-.- r:ie . wnv - 5517 15% 19.7 55 MPH 0.9 3 50% 23.6 65 MPH 0.3 1 85% 90% 28.4 29:2 8/17/2007 Page : 6 w Headinal HeadinQ2 HeadinA3 Printed : 8/17/2007 Page: 7 nata File: Doncaster Wav - 5512 Site: TWO : Doncaster Way - 5512 Date: 08/' Title2 Direction: BASB Title3 30 -34 35 -39 40-44 45 -49 50 -54 55 -59 60 -64 65 69 70 99 Avg 20 -24 25 -29 Begin Total 1 -14 15 -19 MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH Time MPH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 06.00 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 07:00 21 0 1 9 9 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 08:00 77 0 8 34 32 3 0 0 0 0 p p 0 25 09:00 17 0 1 8 6 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 23 10:00 29 1 1 22 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 11:00 31 1 7 15 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 12:PM 11 2 1 3 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 29 01:00 8 0 0 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 02:00 11 1 2 2 5 1 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 03:00 15 0 0 3 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 25 04:00 22 0 0 13 7 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 24 05:00 46 0 6 19 18 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 06:00 11 0 0 2 6 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 07:00 3 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 08:00 3 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 2 09:00 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 10:00 5 2 0 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 32 11:00 3 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 2 1 1 0 0 0 24 Daily 317 9 28 139 114 21 Totals 2.8 8.8 43.8 36.0 6.6 0.6 0.0 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Percent of Total Percentile Speeds 100/0 15% 50% 850/6 90% 19.1 20.4 24.4 29.1 29.8 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Nurnber in pace 253 % in pace 79.8 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH 55 MPH 65 MPH Percentage 1.3 0.3 0.0 . Totals 4 1 0 Printed : 8/17/2007 Page: 7 nata File: Doncaster Wav - 5512 IV Headinel Heading2 Heading3 Percent of Total 2.5 5.7 53.3 32.8 4.1 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 Percentile Speeds Doncaster Wav - 5512 20.2 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 105 % in pace Site: Speed Exceeded 45 MPH Percentage 0.8 Totals 1 Date: 08/10/07 Title2 Title3 Direction: BASB Total 1 -14 15 -19 20 -24 25 -29 30 -34 35 -39 40 -44 45-49 50 -54 55 -59 60 -64 65 -69 70 -99 Avg Begin Time MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH MPH 12:AM 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 0 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 03:00 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 06:00 3 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 07:00 16 1 2 8 4 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 25 08:00 54 0 3 31 16 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 09:00 13 0 0 7 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 10:00 33 1 2 18 11 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ■ + ■ • • • ■ r w r i 01:00 ■ r • • • i • i w i • • • ■ 02:00 i + y, ■ ■ ■ + r • r + r i i i r i 03:00 • r r r + ■ + w • r r r r 04:00 r • ■ ■ + ■ • ■ • r r i + ■ • 05:00 r + • ■ + w ► • r r i • w • • 05:00 + • + ■ t t r w • + ■ r r s ■ + 07:00 + + ■ r • w i ■ i • i ■ i t t i + r 07:0U ■ ■ ■ • • • • • r • ■ r t r • i 09:00 + + + r • t r i r t r • t w r 10:00 10 ■ + • i i • + i i w w ■ t + t 122 3 7 65 40 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 24 Percent of Total 2.5 5.7 53.3 32.8 4.1 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 Percentile Speeds 10% 20.2 10 MPH Pace Speed : 20-30 Number in pace 105 % in pace 86.1 Speed Exceeded 45 MPH Percentage 0.8 Totals 1 15% 20.7 55 MPH 0.8 1 50% 23.9 65 MPH 0.8 1 85% 90% 28.6 29.4 7/2007 Page : 8 Page 1 of 1 w Jack Sullivan From: Gordon Hughes Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 10:48 AM To: Jack Sullivan Subject: FW: From: Roger Knutson [mailto:RKnutson @ck- law.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 3:01 PM To: Gordon Hughes Subject: 429.031 PRELIMINARY PLANS, HEARINGS. Subd.l(f) The hearing may be adjourned from time to time, and a resolution ordering the improvement may be adopted at any time within six months after the date of the hearing by vote of a majority of all members of the council when the improvement has been petitioned for by the owners of not less than 35 percent in frontage of the real property abutting on the streets named in the petition as the location of the improvement. When there has been no such petition, the resolution may be adopted only by vote of four -fifths of all members of the council; provided that if the mayor of the municipality is a member of the council but has no vote or votes only in case of a tie, the mayor is not deemed to be a member for the purpose of determining a four -fifths majority vote. n P% A In r%A17 s- RE CE1 X31 V Dr. Barbara J. Lorig C17Y OFEDI 5517 Doncaster Way, Edina, MN 55436, Tel: 952- 926 -2412, bilorig(i ,gmail.co wiG Dear Mayor Hovell: I have been a long time resident of Edina. In my professional life, I have served as a high school principal, a dean of students, a state education administrator, and am currently a professional intercultural trainer. Academically, I have a doctorate in educational leadership. I share this with you, not to impress you, but to try and share my expertise with you. When my children were growing up, • I served as a Site Council Member on the Highlands Elementary Site Council, • and I also served as the second PTA President for Highlands Elementary. I was part of the hiring team that selected Peter Hodne as the principal for Highlands when Bob Burnett retired. When I served at Highlands as PTA President, we had two very distinct parent groups, one supportive of Continuous Progress (CP), and the other group supportive of the Neighborhood School. It took at special kind of leadership - -- leaders that were willing to listen to both sides — to create a community that welcomed everyone. As a 22 -year Highlands resident, I am very distressed by the "war zone" that has been created in our neighborhood over the "proposed sidewalk" issue. I have never heard such anger, such unkind comments directed at neighbors, and the vicious tone that has entered people's hearts over this issue. Because Scott and Becky Danielson have led the campaign for the sidewalk, neighbors are being divided into two camps: • Residents that are for the sidewalk and for Scott/Becky; • Residents that are against the sidewalk and against Scott/Becky. Scott and Becky Danielson are my neighbors. I know that they have volunteered tirelessly for this community. I respect them greatly for those efforts. But, at the present time, because they are so invested in the "pro- side ", they have lost their perspective. They are currently circulating an aggressive "petition" for the sidewalk. One of my neighbors (who shall remain anonymous) - -- is afraid to come out of her house — because she doesn't want to be approached by Scott/Becky and be "labeled" in the "No" camp. As an experienced leader, I think there are three issues that are driving this very ugly scenario which is threatening our Highlands community spirit, a spirit that I helped build at Highlands Elementary: • The initial survey was very confusing, very hard to read, and left little room for comment; • Essential information — that impacts this decision — (e.g. demographic elementary child data, property values, ) hasn't even been considered; • Leadership at the city level has not adequately represented the "against the sidewalk" side; M Sadly, I think the next City Council meeting scheduled on September 4 is going to be a very volatile meeting, and if a vote is taken that night, will create a chasm so great in our Highlands neighborhood, that we won't be able to recover our "Highlands community spirit "again. As a City Council, I am turning to you for the needed leadership to help resolve this issue by providing the residents with: • Information that is factual, correct, and more complete; • A leadership style that has a "neutral position" on the sidewalk topic. • A balanced summary of the data, pro & con, once the investigation is completed. I think we live in Edina, and that we are capable of delivering this standard of leadership. But, it will take your action to help resolved this. It must be taken out of the hands of the "angry" leadership that exists on both sides within our neighborhood. These are my recommendations: 1. Table the vote: At the September 4 City Council meeting, pleases consider tabling the sidewalk vote until a later time. That will serve two purposes: • it will allow time to gather a more complete set of data, • and it will allow a "cooling off' period for the residents here. 2. Redo the Survey: The original survey sent to Highland Residents needs to be redone to get a clearer picture of the neighborhood viewpoint. The original survey was very unclear, and worded in a very confusing manner. I would suggest the following questions, which are very clear cut, be included - -- • Question #1: How long have you been a resident of the Highlands area? • Question #2? Do you live on Doncaster Way? • Question #3: Are you in favor of the sidewalk proposal in the Highlands area? Yes or No • Question #4: Why or why not? • Question #5: If you are in favor of the sidewalk proposal, where would you like to see the sidewalk built? (please color the map below) (Note: if people are not in favor of the sidewalk, I don't think you need to ask them about where they want it built - -- because the obvious answer will be on the opposite side of the street.) Anonymity: Lastly, you need to guarantee anonymity, and a correct survey count. At the present time, there is clearly a list being circulated in the neighborhood of who "voted yes" and who "voted no ". Many residents are very upset that their "privacy" was compromised in the last survey. Lastly, the survey should include a cover page, to identify the property submitting the survey (and insure that no one is "stuffing the ballot box "). Once that is property is checked off by the city official, the cover page should be destroyed, the survey data collated without a name. 3.' Traffic Data: If safety is the concern here, then shouldn't the data on the traffic patterns be taken on a school day, and not on a day in the middle of August when most of the residents were gone on vacation. 4. Demographic Data: If the sidewalk is being built for "safety" reasons, then shouldn't the demographic data - -- of where the walking elementary children on Doncaster Way live - -- also be taken into consideration. If the sidewalk is constructed on the odd -side of Doncaster Way for the 2008 -2009 school year, this will be the scenario: • The Danielsons (552 1) will no longer have children in elementary school; • The Lorigs (5517) have no children in elementary, only adult children; • The Foleys (5513) have no children in elementary school; • The Rushees (5509), with 2 elementary daughters, and who live right next door to the Highlands driveway, will most likely walk out their backyard onto school property, and never use the front sidewalk. So, the city will have constructed a sidewalk for a total of "zero Highlands walking" children on the odd side. I don't anticipate any of us changing houses for over 10 years, - -- so that number is going to remain the same. On the even side of Doncaster, there are a total of 10 children who are in preschool or elementary school: (5516: 2 children: 5512: 2 children; 5508: 3 children: 5504: 3 children) • Those 10 children will still walk on the grass in the summer /fall; • And in the winter, when the snow is high, those 10 children will walk on the street; • And, will cross at the designated cross walk at Highlands Elementary. So, based on the demographics on where the children live, why is the city recommending the "odd side" of the street when the walking children are on "the even" side of the upper part of Doncaster Way? (see attached map). 5. Appoint a "neutral Edina City leader" to oversea this project. I am sure that Wayne Houle has tried to do his best to work through this issue. However, I have heard several residents on the the "no sidewalk" side view express this opinion when they went to visit him at this office: t • They feel that they have received "less than a warm welcome;" • And, they feel that there is an unwillingness to listen to their concerns. In the spirit of trying to deliver a "neutral" evaluation of this decision, there needs to be a city leader which is willing to list the "pros and cons" of both sides, and present those to the City Council. In this particular case, I think Wayne has lost that position of trust with a significant sector of Highlands residents. 6. Property Value considerations. If the current plan moves forward, the residents at the end of Doncaster (5408, 5701Ayshire) could be negatively impacted by the sidewalk. Compared to the setbacks of other houses, their houses are very closely aligned to the street. Once a sidewalk goes in, their "curb appeal" will be significantly impacted. Is it fair to reduce their property value? Or, should the sidewalk be placed on the odd side of Doncaster (5605 Ayshire, 5405, 5409, 5413, 5417, 5421, 5501) at the end of the street, where the setbacks are much more significant? 7. Highland culture? The Highlands has always been a very sought after neighborhood in Edina. People move into Highlands because of the "rural feel" that it offers, - -- streets without curb and gutter, streets without sidewalks, rural mailboxes, - -- very "uncluttered and undeveloped" culture. Will the sidewalks compromise that "rural feeling" that has been treasured by its residents for so long? Summary: In summary, I hope that you will listen to my request to take action to "save" the community spirit of my neighborhood. Unfortunately, there are so many bad feelings on both sides of the fence, I don't think the residents can resolve this without your help. I truly believe if, as a City Council, you take action to: • Gather the facts, pro .& con, in a professional manner; • Communicate that information in a complete manner to the residents; • Select a neutral leader that exudes a sense of neutrality & fairness to both sides. • And, then take a decision based upon those facts. I think the residents of Highlands can accept that process and your decision; and, most importantly, the community spirit of Highlands can be preserved. Thank you for your time in listening to me. If you need my help in formatting the survey to make it clearer, I would gladly volunteer my time. I would also volunteer to lead this project, but I think you need a person who is not tied to Highlands. As a suggestion, Jan Michelitz, (I am sure that I have spelled this wrong), who served with me on the PTA board is a very adept leader, and has served on many planning committees for the Edina School System. Sincerely, Barbara voorig, PhD. Demographic Data 2008 -2009 Number of Children in Elementary School Which will walk to Highlands '0Q 0;,# I1cN- 4 oo :7 Tr Al S .rl* rs/ 1 le I %AI S. / s X51 AA e� AUG 3 t 2407 CI-y of EDINA August 29, 2007 Mayor Hovland and Edina City Council Dear Mayor and Council Members: As a 35 year resident of Doncaster Way, I am writing in vehement opposition of the sidewalk proposed from Vernon Avenue to Highlands Park. Furthermore, I cannot believe we have not been able to bring this issue to closure in nearly four years. According to the survey results, of those residents who responded, roughly 55% are opposed to the sidewalk (80 homes), while only 45% are in favor (65 homes). In all other true voting situations, the majority rules, does it not? A sidewalk provides the option for safety, but it does not guarantee safety. In 35 years, I have neither witnessed nor heard of any safety incident involving a Highlands Elementary student. Why do we believe that the trip to the school has suddenly become unsafe? The charm of the neighborhood is one reason why homeowners were attracted to this area originally. Don't pave the lawns with concrete. The student population is transitory, but a sidewalk will forever change the landscape of our suburban neighborhood. Listen to the voices of the majority and put an end to this issue once and for all. Sincerely, obert E. Westlund osemary G. We lund i Agenda Item II.A. August 26, 2007 James Hovland, Mayor Edina City Hall 4801 West 50d' Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland: I am writing in regard to the proposed sidewalk along Doncaster Way near Highland Elementary School in western Edina. My position is in opposition to the proposal for the following reasons: Safety is the primary reason suggested for its proposal, but the school has been there for over 50 years (we have lived along Doncaster for,37) and I believe that there has never been an incident involving children's safety during that time. ' In good weather I have often counted fewer than 10 walkers daily in the stretch from Ayrshire to the school and even fewer during the winter. Adding a sidewalk would unlikely add walkers. B&es are not a factor since they are supposed to be on the road, not a sidewalk. The traffic count does not warrant a sidewalk since it is far less than the 750 cars daily given as a cut -offi The high count acquired during one week a few years ago was during a soccer tournament at Highlands Park in the evening. The latest count puts the number at 213 for an average Monday through Friday on the northern stretch of Doncaster tested. Cost figures given four years ago were approximately $93,770 for a blacktop surface. The proposal is now concrete. Can it be done for the same cost without considering a change in materials or inflation? There are several trees, at least one underground sprinkling system and a drainage system that would have to be replaced and have not been considered in the estimate. Aesthetically one side of one street in the Highlands neighborhood would lose its suburban lawn appearance with a ribbon of cement up to nine feet away from the road. The maintenance of this strip of cement and the boulevard would realistically become the responsibility of the homeowners, all of who on the north stretch are in opposition to the proposal. Highlands is the only school in Edina not on a major street. The original survey sent from the city office, if examined, shows that its formation of questions was geared towards a `yes" vote, yet the results of the neighborhood survey came in with far more "no" or "no response" votes. This was a survey of the over 200 homeowners in the Highlands neighborhood. Interestingly, most of the `yes" votes were from the western side of the neighborhood from where the children are bused so would not be additional users. Before voting on this important issue, please drive up and down Doncaster Way imagining a sidewalk along one side of one street in this suburban styled neighborhood. The traffic count, history, cost factor, neighborhood survey and aesthetics do not warrant the addition of a sidewalk, particularly regarding the northern section of the proposal. Thank you for your consideration regarding this issue. SSOd 1.0 Deb Mangen From: Laura Fulton ,ent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 8:19 AM o: 'jhovland @krauserollins.com'; 'Immasica @aol.com'; 'Housh, Scot'; Jonibennett12 @comcast.net'; 'ANN SWENSON' Cc: Deb Mangen Subject: FW: Doncaster Way Sidewalk - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wayne glaus (mailto:wglaus@earthlink.net] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 9:04 PM To: Laura Fulton Subject: Doncaster Way Sidewalk Ladies and Gentlemen of the city council, I am writing to register my strong objection to the proposed sidewalk project (improvement S -092) that is.proposed for my neighborhood. I was not able to attend the informational meeting on 8/15, but understand that the proposed project is meant to provide a 'safer' route to Highlands Elementary School. While I fully support safety measures for school children, I believe that this is not the answer and moreover that it will significantly damage the ascetic of out neighborhood. Having lived in this neighborhood for the past 12 years, I am not aware of any incidents involving commuting school children and in my experience the biggest danger is in fact from speeding parents who are delivering their children either to the school or to an event at the field on Doncaster Way. My suggestion would be a better enforcement of the existing traffic laws and an encouragement to use the Edina school bus system. I strongly urge you to reject this proposal in favor of other measures. 'hank you 4 ayne Glaus 5405 Doncaster Way Deb Mangen From: Laura Fulton Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 10:24 AM 'jhovland @krauserollins.com'; 'Immasica @aol.com'; 'ANN SWENSON'; 'Housh, Scot'; 'jonibennettl2 @comcast.net' Cc: Deb Mangen Subject: FW: Halifax Avenue Sidewalks From: Marsha Buchok [mailto:marbuchok @gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 10:22 AM To: Laura Fulton Subject: Halifax Avenue Sidewalks To: Linda Masica and City Council Members: Re: Halifax Avenue Sidewalks I was able to attend the Halifax Avenue sidewalk proposal public hearing on August 15th. I heard both pro's and con's regarding the "sidewalk issue ", and as I look at it, the "short- term" and "long- term" view points. I support the "long- term" viewpoint of proposed sidewalks on Halifax Avenue. I agree that they create a safe alternative to walking on our busy street. I like the idea of linking the neighborhood to parks and shopping areas. I believe that they will encourage more walking as well as promote neighborhood "gathering ". uple of items to consider as the council proceeds: 1.) Include sidewalks on both the east and west side of the street. I took a walk down Maple Road the other day and I liked the balance and ambience of sidewalks on both sides of the street. It encourages pedestrian traffic on both the east and west side of the street and it will remove the "fairness" issue of who gets them and who doesn't.... 2.) Install new street lights. Again, when I walked down Maple Road I noticed design specific street lamp posts that reflect a "small town" feel. These would look very nice on Halifax Avenue. 3.) Landscaping and maintenance. Many of our neighbors expressed concern about how the sidewalks will impact the front of their yard. Will trees be cut down? What if I have an elevated landscape? Who will maintain the sidewalks? I think it's important to inform and educate the residents on these concerns. An elevated drawing of the proposed "finished project" would be helpful for all of us that are visual learners. As I read the article in the Sunday paper, I agree with Wayne Houle, Director of Edina Public Works when he was quoted... "usually people oppose them at the start, but enjoy them once. they're in." I will not be able to attend the Sept 4th council hearing as I will be out of town. Thanks for your time and effort on this matter. As I left the hearing and reflected on the evening discussion I thought, isn't it wonderful that people care so much about their neighborhoods! M --sha Buchok ix Avenue resident n,�._ouchok gmail.,com 8/20/2007 Deb Mangen From: Laura Fulton Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 11:57 AM 1: 1hovland @krauseroll ins. com'; ' Housh, Scot'; 'Immasica @aol.com'; 'ANN SWENSON'; 'jonibennett12 @comcast.net' Cc: Deb Mangen Subject: FW: Edina Highlands Sidewalk From: JAMES DOEPKE [mailto:twc9529229345 @earthlink.net] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 9:47 PM To: Laura Fulton Cc: Doepke, Jim L Subject: Edina Highlands Sidewalk August 28, 2007 Edina City Council Members: Joni Bennett Linda Mason Ann Swenson Scott Housh Re: Highlands Sidewalk Proposal Council Members, .dish to express our opposition to the sidewalk proposal scheduled for review at the council meeting on September 4. This oppostion is based on the following: • Edina Highlands was developed with the idea that green space with wide, rolling streets was good. The popularity of the Highlands neighborhood has proven that vision to be successful and sustaining. Adding concrete to this green space destroys the character of this unique part of Edina, to say nothing of the anti environmental message it sends. • There has been no quantitative data presented that would support the need for a sidewalk. The City Engineering Department's traffic measurment from August did not meet their own threshhold of 750 cars per day. It was under 200. In the 50 years that Highlands School has been open, we are not aware of any accidents involving individuals where a sidewalk would have made a difference. • Traffic numbers are only one part of the equation. Pedestrian numbers are the other. Based on our own 15 years of observation, there is limited pedestrian use, even during the school season. We don't agree with the opinion that "if you build it, they will come ". The reality is, parents have been driving their children to school at ever increasing numbers. Whatever safety risk there is on a school day is due to that. We support the need for pedestrian safety and more importantly, child safety. The sidewalk proposal as drafted does not make it safer for either of these groups in any substantive way. Permanently changing the character of this neighborhood with sidewalks is a bad idea and not the way to go. We respectfully hope you vote "against" the proposal as presented. Thank you. J' Q, Jeanne Doepke Doncaster Way L A, MN 55436 952 - 922 -9345 8/30/2007 Agenda Item II. A. Wayne Houle Subject: FW: REQUEST FOR SERVICE From: djulien @ci.edina.mn.us [mailto:djulien @ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 10:14 AM To: Diane Julien Cc: Diane Julien Subject: REQUEST FOR SERVICE * indicates a required field r Street Light Out r Street Light Flickering C Street Light Out During Day C Light Out in Traffic Signal C Pothole Page 1 of 2 City of Edina - 4801 W. 50th Street - Edina, MN 55424 *PROBLEM TYPE (select one) C Missing /Damaged Street Sign r Low or Sunken Street Area (Standing Water) *Name of Requester Address of Requester *Telephone Number *Location of Problem (Street address or cross streets of intersection) Shirley Olsen REQUEST FOR SERVICE r Sod Damaged by City Plow, Utility Work, Other C Mail Box Damage by City Plow r Storm Water Problems r Water Leaks r Water Meter Problems Diseased Trees and /or Overgrown Vegetation Other 952 - 922 -2366 Highlands school area Explanation of Problem I would like to know what happened to goverenment of the people and FOR the people ?? The numbers (of cars) show that we do NOT NEED a sidewalk in our neighborhood (near Highlands school). Please work on the much more important projects in Edina than putting in a 8/31/2007 Page 2 of 2 sidewalk that people do NOT want plus a sidewalk that I have to pay for that I will NEVER use due to where I live. If the neighbors along the path want a sidewalk they should pay for itll Trust me Edina has so many other areas that need work than to waste time on thisll 8/31/2007 Page 1 of 1 Jack Sullivan Agenda Item II. A. -- -)m: Mertes, Jack [Jack.Mertes @Gortons.com] At: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 1:09 PM To: Jack Sullivan Cc: Lori Mertes Subject: Doncaster Sidewalk Jack Sullivan Edina Assistant City Engineer Please review and forward on to the City Council Members. Our names are Lori and Jack Mertes and we live at 5209 Doncaster Way. Our eight year old daughter currently attends Highlands Elementary School. Our two older sons also attended Highlands. We moved to Doncaster Way about two years ago. One key reason we moved to this particular neighborhood was so our kids could walk to school. After the first week of walking in the street, dodging traffic and a fleet of school busses, we no longer allow our kids walk to /from school on Doncaster. It is not safe. We will either DRIVE to Highlands, which is totally contrary to why we were interested in moving here or personally walk our student up Lochloy and cut through a friendly neighbor's yard on Ayrshire. We totally totally support sidewalks. We feel bad this has become so divisive in the neighborhood and don't believe this should have to come down to a "neighborhood" vote. It is our understanding that all the other elementary schools in Edina have sidewalks. Why wouldn't this school? Edina made a mistake 50 years ago when sidewalks were not installed as part of the construction of Highlands Elementary. .ands is now on a late start schedule which means children will be going home each afternoon at 3:50. More parents then ever will be picking up their kids from school to get them to their extracurricular activities. Anticipate traffic getting even worse for the five to eleven year old children trying to walk home on the busy streets. This decision should be about one thing..... safety for the kids! * * * * * * * * ** Gorton's Confidentiality Statement * * * * * * * * ** The information contained in this message and any attachment(s) may contain confidential, legally privileged, or proprietary information. Using, copying, disclosing or distributing of all or any portion of this message by anyone other than the intended recipient(s) named above is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by reply email and delete the original message and any copies in your possession, custody or control. 9/4/2007 Agenda August 29, 2007 -r�te,71c. -A - Edina City Council Edina, MN RE: Doncaster Sidewalk Dear Council Members: /AFcF C/y OP �jycO,c���4 Although we are not able to be present at the September 41 council meeting to consider the City Engineering Department's recommendation to construct a sidewalk along Doncaster Way, we do want to be heard in our opposition to this project. We have previously written the City of our opposition to this project for reasons indicated in those letters. Our opposition is based on questionable benefit of the sidewalk (need), escalating property values and resulting property tax increases (cost), cost vs. benefit, and neighborhood aesthetics. Highland School has been in our neighborhood for nearly 50 years and our children have gotten along without the sidewalk. We are vehemently opposed to this project and are asking that you turn this project down. Sincerely S & �Ch Olson 5528 Glengarry Edina, MN 55437 Residents of Highland neighborhood for 20 years. Deb Manaen From: Barbara Felker [doilroom @sprynet.com] Ab • wc;� Sent: Friday, August 31, 2007 10:04 PM ,%% To: Deb Subject: City Council WGD& Please forward this e-mail to the mayor and the four City Council members as you suggested when I called today. Since the voting on the sidewalk proposal is on Tuesday evening, please send it ASAP. Thank you for your assistance. Barbara Felker dollroom@sprynet.com +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ I am writing to tell you about some concerns regarding the proposed sidewalk along Doncaster Way. At the north end there are four and a half lots affected. The first one across from Highlands Park belongs to Jim and Grace Kelly who have installed an expensive underground sprinkling system which would have to be redirected. The second house is that of Paul and Ann Hussian who would have a ribbon of concrete reducing the size of their front lawn where neighborhood children play. The third lot, at the corner of Doncaster and Merritt Circle, is ours, Jim and Barbara Felker. We have two mature evergreens planted on private property but one overhangs the nine foot easement by quite a bit. We would not like to have our tree removed or even trimmed back since it has taken so long to reach its present size. At the front corner is a clump of birch trees that also hang over the proposed sidewalk area. On the other side of Merritt is the home of Matt and Patty Hankes who, about two years ago, installed an expensive drainage tile system because they had been having water in their basement after a rain. The system is designed to include the area up to the street and would need further modification or they could get water inside again. Among these four families is only one child who attends Highlands and all four families are opposed to the sidewalk. All of us maintain lawns,that extend to the street and enjoy the expanses without viewing a ribbon of concrete cutting off the edges. I realize that safety has been the primary argument in favor of the construction, but with so few children walking up the street the construction seems like an unnecessary expense. There are no children living across the street along Doncaster on these two blocks and just a few on the far north end of Doncaster, most of whom are driven or ride bikes to school. Unlike the other Edina schools, Highlands School is located in a purely residential neighborhood not along a major road. Please do not treat Doncaster Way as if it is a thoroughfare for traffic. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of this issue. Barbara Felker Deb Mangen prom: Laura Fulton ent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 7:36 AM 1,0: 'jhovland @krauserollins.com'; 'Housh, Scot'; 'Immasica @aol.com'; 'ANN SWENSON'; 'jonibennett12 @comcast.net' Cc: Deb Mangen; Josie Lowell Subject: FW: Sept. 4 Council Topic - S -092 - Doncaster Sidewalk Improvement e atb C/ ry Ot-FD //yq ----- Original Message - - - -- From: jjones4@mmm.com (mailto:jjones4 @mmm.com] N��fpj Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 10:55 PM To: Laura Fulton Subject: Sept. 4 Council Topic - S -092 - Doncaster Sidewalk Improvement To the Edina City Council: At the Sept. 4 City Council Mtg, I would like to make the following comments on Issue S -092, the Doncaster Sidewalk Improvement. My name is Jason Jones. I live at 5109 Mirror Lakes Drive. Currently the City plans to assess some homes in areas that DO NOT walk to Highlands (the western and northern parts of the neighborhood), while not assessing some homes that are definitely in the walking zone (areas east of Doncaster). It seems like the sidewalks benefit people who walk. People who benefit should definitely pay for the sidewalks. People who don't benefit probably should not. I the Doncaster Sidewalk Improvements are necessary, I think you need to assess: All homes that are in the walking area to Highlands Elementary The walking zone, we were told by the City, is defined as all homes that are 0.7 mile or less from the city. Our home is more than 0.7 mile from Highlands Elementary School. People on our street are bussed to Highlands. Thank you for considering this before voting on this improvement. Jason Jones 612 - 207 -1969 cell 1 REPORURECOM M EN DATION TO: Mayor & City Council From: Wayne D. Houle, PE City Engineer Date: September 4, 2007 Subject: Public Hearing for Halifax Avenue Sidewalk Improvements S -100 Recommendation: Agenda Item # II. B. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ® Resolution Ordinance Discussion If the Council determines the project to be warranted and necessary, Council shall adopt a resolution accepting the feasibility study and approving Halifax Avenue Sidewalk Improvements, City Improvement No. S -100. Info /Background: City staff received a petition on December 14, 2004 for construction of sidewalk on Halifax Avenue from 51st Street West to 54th Street West. The current petition only contains 28% of the affected properties; this will require a 4/5 favorable vote by the City Council to move the project forward. The proposed project would involve constructing a boulevard style sidewalk along the easterly side of Halifax Avenue from West 54th Street to West 51 st Street. The Feasibility Study is included with this report, along with all correspondence received to date. The estimated sidewalk project cost is $127,500. Funding for this project will be from 75% special assessments ($94,650) and 25% City revolving fund ($32,850). Staff analyzed the project and feels that the project is feasible and needed from an engineering standpoint. GAEngineering \Improvements \S100 Halifax Ave—W. 51st to 54thWDMIN \MISQRR_ public hearing S100.doc cvo1- A, o� a DRAFT FEASIBILITY STUDY - S100 J .ay ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT •,�. CITY OF EDINA SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS HALIFAX AVENUE AUGUST 30, 2007 LOCATION: Halifax Avenue from 541h Street to 51St Street. (See Figure 1) Figure 1. Project Area Map 5019 15044 _ 5037 5036 - -`- -.'- - - -_ -'_ 5105 5104 - - - - -- -1 51ST ST W o 'n 5101 5100 5101 5101 5100 5109 5108 5101 5100 5103 5105 5104 5105 °o 5104 5113 5112 5105 5104 u 5109 5108 5109 5105 u 0 5107 5108 5117 5116 5109 5108 0 5115 5112 5113 51095112 5121 5120 5113 5114 ii 5117 5116 5117 5112 5111 5116 5125.5124 5117 9 5121 5120 5121 5116 5113 5120 51295128 5121 r5120 a 5125 5124 5125 5120 5115 5124 5133 5132 512515124 n 5129 ;j 5128 5129 5117 u 5133 u 5132 5133 5130 5128 5137 5136 _ 5129 5128 u 5137 5136 project Limits 52ND ST W,1 I + 5201 5200 ° 5201 520 42074201 5205 5204 n n 5205 3915 j 5209 5208 ° 5209 5212 „ 5213 5217 5216 U 5217 LU p 5221 5220 a 5221 w 5225 5224 i 5225 z 5229 5228 5229 = 5233 w 5232 5233 5232 ._- z z 5236 i 5241 5240 a 5241 5300 J =� 5301 5301 5304 5305 5300 5309 5308 5309 5313 5312 5313 5316 n 5317 5321 5320 5321 - 5324 5325 5330 5328 � 5329 5333 5332 nI 5333 5354 5336 ° n 5337 3908 5354 NA.M, 54TH ST W 41 0 o e m )� " WE r i Halifax Avenue 5 u Sidewalk Project Area Engineering Dept. September. 2007 Figure 1. Project Area Map Feasibility Study Halifax Avenue Sidewalk Improvements S -100 August 30, 2007 INITIATION & ISSUES: This project was initiated by a petition accepted by the City of Edina on December 14, 2004. There was a petition circulated around the neighborhood for sidewalk; a month later there was another petition circulated for people not in favor of sidewalk. You will notice in Figure 3 the petition results, 28% of residents are currently on the petition. The following are existing features and resident comments that present issues in determining the feasibility of the project and are addressed in this report: • Daily vehicle traffic in excess of 750 cars per day (see figure 2) • Safety of residents and children • Located within a defined business zone • Existing mature trees • Existing landscaping and driveways • Steep Grades • Location of Sidewalk, East versus West side of Halifax Avenue EXISTING CONDITIONS: The existing roadway is a bituminous surface with concrete curb and gutter approximately 31 feet wide. A sidewalk extends along the east side of the road from the existing pedestrian cross walk at 51" Street West and Halifax Avenue a half block to the south to 51st Street West, see photo 1. This sidewalk also connects to sidewalk within the 50th and France area. This connection or crosswalk is signed with a pedestrian activated flasher system. No other sidewalks exist within the neighborhood, see photo 2. Photo 1. Halifax Avenue — Looking Photo 2. Halifax Avenue — Looking North Toward West 51" Street South from West 51St Street Page 2 of 8 Feasibility Study Halifax Avenue Sidewalk Improvements S -100 August 30, 2007 .- .-- -._ - -- ----- .- - - -- ----------------- - - - - -� �- 50TH ST. W 5001 5000 5001 "2 m v { 3909 0 , � 0 0 4121 r, 3917 -43 -15 0 5003 5002 5003 • 0 0 r 5005 5004 5007 5006 5009 5008 5011 5010 5013 5012 5015 5014 5017 5016 5019 5018 5021 5020 5023 5022 0 5029 5038 5110 5112 5114 5116 5230 r ryry0 5 5232 1 5236 11 5300 15 5304 11 5308 19 5312 25 5316 31 5320 37 5324 43 5328 51 s7 5336 5005 5016 5017 u°> 5007 5020 : 4050 ' 5009 5024 5021 3945 i 5011 5032 5025 5034 5013 5036 i _ 5036 i 5028 5029 5028 5040 w 5033 5D32 z i 5015 5017 5101 5100 > .1 ADT 1133 5019 5044 5037 5036 a ; 4075 B -2007 5105 5104 x ' - - -• Q0 5101 5100 5109 5108 5101 5100 au 5101 5100 - ' " - -'' 5103 x� 5105 51P: 5105 0 5104 5113 5112 5105 5104 u ° 5105 0 51o5 5108 5109 Y, 5108 5117 5116 5109 51 0$ 5107 CA. 4-9115 5112 5113 r w 5109 5112 5121 5120 5113 5114 o 5117 5116 5117 5112 ; z W 5111 5116 5125 5124 5117 5116 °c 5121 5120 5121 5116 < 5113 0 5125 w 0 5125 5124 v 5120 5129 5128 5121 5120 u 5120 z 5115 a 5129 5128 5129 ; 5124 5133 5132 5125 5124 ° 5133 5132 5133 5130 i u_ 5117 5128 5137 5136 5129 5128 a 5137 5136 5137 5132 52TH ST. W. 5201 5200 o 5201 5200 ' 4207 3915 5205 4201 5204 U 5205 5209 5208 5209 5212 a 5213 U 5217 5216 u 5217 ADT 875 5221 5220 5221 -2000 5225 5224 '�� 5225 5229 5228 ° 5229 5233 5232 1n� 52333 " 5232 5236 ° °'�"•� r 5241 5240 ••• ■•�•�5241 r 5300 n 5301 r 5301 5300 5304 5305 5309 5308 W o' 5309 ADT 887 5313 5312 W g 5313 8 -2007 5316 < i 5317 5321 5320 X" 5321 5324 5325 0 5330 5328 = 5329 5333 5332 ;; 5333 5354 5336 5337 3908 5354 54TH 5T. W. Legend o ®•n_. Existing Sidewalk - -- - -- Proposed Sidewalk E ADT Average Daily Traffic z Figure 2. Average Daily Traffic History N W +E S September 2007 Page 3 of 8 Feasibility Study Halifax Avenue Sidewalk Improvements S -100 August 30, 2007 54TH ST W Figure 3 — Petition Results 50th St. W. �a U Z 0 z C 0 U W w Q w U Z Q L Agenda Item # . — N Halifax Avenue Sidewalk Petition Results YES SIGNED YES PETITION BUT NO LONGER RESIDE AT ADDRESS SHOWN. NO SIGNED NO PETITION BUT NO LONGER RESIDE AT ADDR' SHOWN. CHANGED VOTE FROM YES TO NO Page 4 of 8 Q 0 Q o , JUANITA AVE -. p1ST STW 51ST ST > - w Q > Q w Q Q x � 0 = Z 52ND ST W 54TH ST W Figure 3 — Petition Results 50th St. W. �a U Z 0 z C 0 U W w Q w U Z Q L Agenda Item # . — N Halifax Avenue Sidewalk Petition Results YES SIGNED YES PETITION BUT NO LONGER RESIDE AT ADDRESS SHOWN. NO SIGNED NO PETITION BUT NO LONGER RESIDE AT ADDR' SHOWN. CHANGED VOTE FROM YES TO NO Page 4 of 8 Feasibility Study Halifax Avenue Sidewalk Improvements S -100 August 30, 2007 PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS: The Halifax Avenue Sidewalk Improvements consist of constructing a 4 foot wide boulevard style concrete walk from the intersection of 51St Street West and Halifax Avenue, then south to the intersection of West 54th Street and Halifax Avenue. The sidewalk is proposed to be located on the east side of the roadway. The proposed alignment will match into the existing sidewalk on 51 St Street West and Halifax Avenue. The overall easterly side alignment helps reduce the disturbance to existing trees, landscaping and other natural features. The boulevard width will vary to avoid trees and help minimize retaining walls due to steep grades in yards. (See Figure 4 and Photo 3) i 1-Nd :jam I® FZ731 `I: . -J I r.l ; a' f, -nC1. 4T r �.ILt, �g,rr,aPr� �r It f . iii 52TH.S7. W, �. . Uj ± '� 54TH ST. W. eeeeee Existing Sidewalk 8 y woo =� Proposed Sidewalk Figure 4. Proposed Sidewalk Location N W +E S September 2007 Page 5 of 8 v_, \ -'- 1Z It f `I: . -J I r.l ; a' f, -nC1. 4T r �.ILt, �g,rr,aPr� �r It f . iii 52TH.S7. W, �. . Uj ± '� 54TH ST. W. eeeeee Existing Sidewalk 8 y woo =� Proposed Sidewalk Figure 4. Proposed Sidewalk Location N W +E S September 2007 Page 5 of 8 Feasibility Study Halifax Avenue Sidewalk Improvements S -100 August 30, 2007 Photo 3. Boulevard Style Sidewalk e. w MAINTENANCE OF SIDEWALK: This sidewalk is considered a local sidewalk and the maintenance of the sidewa. will be the responsibility of the homeowner per Edina City Code 1200.03. RIGHT -OF -WAY & EASEMENTS: The right -of -way along Halifax Avenue is typically 60 feet wide. All proposed improvements stay within this right -of -way and no additional easement requirements are anticipated. PROJECT COSTS: The total estimated project cost is $127,500 (see Table 1). The total cost includes indirect costs of 15% for engineering and clerical costs and 7.5% for first year finance costs. Funding for the entire project will be from special assessment and City of Edina funds, see the attached sidewalk finance policy. The cost participation breakdown is shown in Table 1. Percentage $ Amount I Sidewalk Cost Participation: City of Edina 25% $32,850 Assessed to 60 Residents 75% $94,650 Total Project: $127,500 Table 1. Estimated Project Costs Page 6 of 8 Feasibility Study Halifax Avenue Sidewalk Improvements S -100 August 30, 2007 ASSESSMENTS: A special assessment of approximately $1,600 per residential equivalent unit will be levied against residents located along both sides of Halifax Avenue from 51St Street West to 54th Street West. Dui( 5101 5100 4075 5050 5019 5044 5037 5036 5105 5104 51ST ST W t- - -•• -- -•7101 5100 5101 5101 5100 5109 5108 510115100 5103 5105 5104 5105 O 5104 5113 5112 510515104 5109 5108 5109 ,2 5105 5107 5108 5117 5116 5109 =5108 5115 5112 5113 5109 5112 5121 5120 5113;5114 5117 1 5116 5117 5112 5111 5116 5125 5124 5117 5116 5121 5120 5121 5116 5113 5120 5129 5128 5121 =5120 5125 1. 5124 5125 5120 5115 : 5129 1 5128 5129 5124 5133 5132 512515124 5117 5133 ; 5132 5133 5130 5128 5137 5136 5129 5128 5137 1 5136 , Project Limits] 52ND ST W� w' - - - -- 5201 : •5200 5201 1 5205 4207 1 3915 3915 5205 4201 Z 5204 5205 5209 5208 5209 5212 5213 1. 5217 5216 5217 5221 i 5220 5221 -.� 5225 5224 5225 5229 5228 5229 5233 = 5232 5233 1 5232 5236 'a > 5241 5240 < 5241 w LL U 5301 5300 = 5301 5300 X 5304 5305 ' 5309 5308 5309 5313 5312 5313 0 5316 5317 5321 5320 5321 ' 5324 5325 p 5330 5328 5329 533' 5332 5333 5354 _ 5336 5337 ; 3908 5354 's... .................. 54TH ST W 5400 5401 3 1s Halifax Avenue $1,600 Preliminary Assessment Role Figure 5. Preliminary Resident Assessment Map rN N'� E S Engineenng Dept Sepl —ber, 2007 Page 7 of 8 FEASIBILITY: Staff recommends constructing a sidewalk on Halifax Avenue between 51St Street West and 54th Street West. This recommendation is based upon safety issues along Halifax Avenue. These safety issues include the daily amount of traffic and also the vicinity of the 50th and France area to this neighborhood. ATTACHMENTS: This project is also feasible from an Engineering standpoint. • Petition To The City Council • Resident Letter #1 — Informational Meeting Notice • Project Comments and Letters Received 0 Open House Power Point Presentation 0 Open House Attendance List and Comments • Public Hearing Notices, Certificate of Mailing and List of Labels • Future Sidewalk Financing Policy • Transportation Plan & Policy 1999 and 2005 • Parks and Recreation Needs Assessment 0 Traffic Data 0 429.031 Preliminary Plans, Hearing. Page 8 of 8 Feasibility Study Halifax Avenue Sidewalk Improvements S -100 August 30, 2007 PROJECT SCHEDULE: Council Orders Public Hearing ................. .........................August 7, 201 Open House .... ............................... .........................August 15, 200, Receive Feasibility Report ......... .. ......................September 4, 2007 Public Hearing ................... ............................... September 4, 2007 Bid Opening ..................... .........................Winter 2007 /Spring 2008 Final Assessment Hearing ........ .........................Winter 2007 /Spring 2008 Award Contract ....................... .........................Winter 2007 /Spring 2008 Begin Construction ........................ .........................Spring 2008 Completed Construction ..................... ............................... Summer 2008 FEASIBILITY: Staff recommends constructing a sidewalk on Halifax Avenue between 51St Street West and 54th Street West. This recommendation is based upon safety issues along Halifax Avenue. These safety issues include the daily amount of traffic and also the vicinity of the 50th and France area to this neighborhood. ATTACHMENTS: This project is also feasible from an Engineering standpoint. • Petition To The City Council • Resident Letter #1 — Informational Meeting Notice • Project Comments and Letters Received 0 Open House Power Point Presentation 0 Open House Attendance List and Comments • Public Hearing Notices, Certificate of Mailing and List of Labels • Future Sidewalk Financing Policy • Transportation Plan & Policy 1999 and 2005 • Parks and Recreation Needs Assessment 0 Traffic Data 0 429.031 Preliminary Plans, Hearing. Page 8 of 8 A. o e City of Edina, Minnesota m CITY COUNCIL 4801 West 50th Street • Edina, Minnesota 53424 (612) 927 -Ml • (612) 927 - 7645 -EAX • (612) 927- 5411 -TDD PETITION TO THE CITY COUNCIL 0 SIDEWALK ❑ ALLEY PAVING ❑ WA' ❑ STORM SEWER . ❑ SANITARY SEWER r J ❑ CURB AND GUTTER ONLY ❑ PERMANENT STREET ❑ SURFACING WITH CURB AND GUTTER To the Mayor and City Council: The persons who have signed this petition ask the City Council to consider the the locations listed below. Q11 Zn— c Per e between SA hs e2-t- LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME between LOCATION OF IMPROVEMENT BY STREET NAME ADDRESS ADDRESS ADDRESS DATE: S ET�GH �G THER: L DEC a y � f uFD -oveme ve to ADDRESS and ADDRESS and and ADDRESS ADDRESS IMPORTANT NOTE: THE PERSONS WHO HAVE SIGNED THIS PETITION UNDERSTAND THAT THE CITY COUNCIL MAY ASSESS THE COSTS OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS AGAINST THE PROPERTIES BENEFITING FROM THE IMPROVEMENTS IN AMOUNTS DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL AS AUTHORIZED BY CHAPTER 429, MINNESOTA STATUTES. PROPERTY OWNER'S SIGNATURE MY - -# 011 OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER'S PHONE �37, 533.E -fix lam- �a7-GS' ?7 This petition was circulated by; N\o.0 -r'\"- _4.�� 1:7\' , Na NAME ADDRESS PHONE There is space for more signatures on the back or you may attach extra pages. SEPTEMERI B0 OWNER'S NAME (PRINTED) JAdos .�. U< /y! E6 riAw s �ovy�,u a ►� ,m ,e � V i PROPERTY ADDRESS 531 1 9A&,s OWNER'S HO sz .y%t -ysz *-.-. zo v 72.1 -21gLy X22$ , i t jc L ?Vg fi-a li p q sa - a (o(e t7(0 Z17 - a z u ZS 1372 ?2S--15'2J 51 71 ' &�C IS-2-9 24 -1 z3 z 5-G o9 5k04 110 Al;fi sz s� X 44 Qsot� a � 1977S 54�-5- bill 0 1 z 3i-� --�3 % 52- z6 ?S-2 Fz� -Rf—Z August 8, 2007 Halifax Avenue Residents Edina, Minnesota RE: Resident Letter No. 1 Informational Meeting Announcement Halifax Avenue Sidewalk Project from 54' Street to 51St Street City of Edina, Improvement No. S -100 Dear Resident: The City Council has ordered a public hearing regarding the above reference project at the September 4, 2007 City Council meeting. Prior to the public hearing City staff will host an Informational Meeting on Wednesday, August 15, from 6:00 to 8:00 p.m., in the Edina City Council Chambers located at 4801 W. 50th Street. (The Council Chambers is immediately to your left as you enter City Hall.) At the Informational Meeting the City will provide a draft feasibility report for the project. If you are unable to attend, information regarding this project will be available after this meeting. Sincerely, Jack �D&�Ilivan Assistant City Engineer G: \Engineering \Improvements \S100 Halifax Ave—W. 51st to 54th\ADMIN\CORR \Resident Letter No 1.doc 8/8/2007 Page 1 of � Meenan, Jack From: Meenan, Jack (MN10) Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2004 8:20 AM To: 'Steve Lillehaug' Cc: 'ritampeluso @yahoo.com' Subject: RE: Questions on Survey and Comment Sheet - Halifax Avenue Improvemen t No A -196 Thanks for the reply. Regarding the sidewalk petition, if that came from the Peluso's and my name is on it, please disregard my signature That survey was done before the cost was known. At that time, we didn't know we would have to pay for the street or the sidewalk. I asked whether there would be a separate assessment for the sidewalk, and was told NO at that time. Since there is a separate assessment, I no longer support the sidewalk. I have returned the survey from the city and have voted Yes to the street and No to the sidewalk. Please use that as my input to the Improvement Plan. Thank you. From: Steve Lillehaug [mailto:sliliehaug @d.edina.mn.us] Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 8:11 AM To: Meenan, Jack (MN10) Cc: Steve Liilehaug Subject: RE: Questions on Survey and Comment Sheet - Halifax Avenue Impro vemen t No A -196 Good morning. We just received a petition for a sidewalk from your neighborhood from 51st down to 54th. We would anticipate the sidewalk being only on the east side of Halifax, which would be a continuation of the existing sidewalk already on the east side just south of 51 st Street. The street will not be widened and the new curb andttter would be installed in the same location as the existing curb and gutter. Impacts to any trees would be rnrtblKzed and we don't anticipate removing any trees (however, if a tree were to be removed, it would be covered under the project). Impacts to fences, landscaping, irrigation systems, etc, will be restored under this project. Thanks. Steve - - - -- Original Message----- From: Meenan, Jack (MN10) [ maiito :jack.meenan @honeyweil.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 6:39 PM To: Steve Lillehaug Subject: RE: Questions on Survey and Comment Sheet - Halifax Avenue Impro vemen t No A -196 Steve - Thanks for the reply. Sorry to be a pest, but I thought of a couple of more questions. I appreciate you taking the time to respond. 1. Would sidewalks be on one side of the street or both? if one side, which one? Page 2 of 3 2. With the curb and gutter work, what damage to trees would be expected near the street? 1 have a large elm in front, which we have treated for years to keep alive. 3. If for some reason (ie sidewalk on our side of the street), the elm in front had to be removed, who pays for that - the city or me. From: Steve Lillehaug [ mailto :slillehaug @ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2004 4:24 PM To: Meenan, lack (MN10) CC: Steve Lillehaug Subject: RE: Questions on Survey and Comment Sheet - Halifax Avenue Improvemen t No A -196 Thank you for your e-mail. The following are responses to your questions (see bold below). Please contact me with any further questions or comments. Thank you. Steve Steven L. Lillehaug, P,E., P.T.O.E. Edina Traffic Engineer /Assistant Engineer Engineering Department 952 - 826-0445 slifiehaug@ci.edina.mn.us City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com (fax) 952 - 826 -0389 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Meenan, Jack (MN10) [ mailto :jack.meenan @honeywell.com] Sent: Saturday, December 11, 2004 7:12 PM To: Steve Lillehaug subject: Questions on Survey and Comment Sheet - Halifax Avenue Improvemen t No A -196 I live at 5300 Halifax Ave S. I am reading through the survey that was sent to us regarding the street improvement project. The survey said to direct questions to you at this email address. I have three questions: 1. 1 received a copy of the slides used at the November 8 Informational meeting. The slides said the assessment for Halifax Ave (street only) would be $12, 000. The survey says $7400. Which is correct? [Steve Lillehaug; The assessment amount provided at the Information Meeting was $11,000 for your address. Since the Nov. 8th meeting, as indicated, we decided to split the projects of Minnehaha Blvd., the Alley, and Halifax Ave. Also, we have received additional design data since that meeting, both of which have reduced the cost of the project. Currently, the estimated assessment is $7,400 for your address. 2. How did this project come about? What is causing this to come up now? [Steve Lillehaug] This project is part of the City's Capital Improvements program. We have a plan to reconstruct the City's infrastructure neighborhood by neighborhood. The South Harriet Park neighborhood (which Page 3 of includes Halifax Avenue) is planned for 2005 construct!on. 3. The slides from Nov 8 imply the street is "wearing out." Is that true? If we choose not to do the project now, when would it come up again? [Steve Lillehaug] Yes, it is our opinion that Halifax Avenue is at the end of and beyond a roadways typical life expectancy and is wore out as are many streets in Edina. December 20, 2004 Steven L. Lillehaug, P.E., P.T.O.E. Edina Traffic Engineer /Assistant Engineer City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Sidewalk petition for 5200 -5300 block of Halifax Ave. So., Edina, MN Dear Mr. Lillehaug: This letter is to serve as notice to remove my name /signature from the petition to install sidewalks on the 5200 — 5300 block of Halifax Ave. So. I have changed my mind and do not wish to be a petitioner on said list. Thank you for your help in this matter. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call me. Sincerely, Mlifax Schomburg X3 Ave. So. Edina, Mn 55424 Phone: 952- 929 -4926 December 20, 2004 ` V Steven L. Lillehaug, P.E., P.T.O.E. Edina Traffic Engineer /Assistant Engineer City of Edina 4801 West 50t` Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Sidewalk petition for 5200 -5300 block of Halifax Ave. So., Edina, MN Dear Mr. Lillehaug: This letter is to serve as notice to remove my name /signature from the petition to install sidewalks on the 5200 — 5300 block of Halifax Ave. So. I have changed my mind and do not wish to be a petitioner on said list. Thank you for your help in this matter. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to call me. Sincerely, / Sheila C. Pierce 5333 Halifax Ave. So. Edina, Mn 55424 Phone: 952- 927 -0577 � ^ .200 54 da-o�tcz - - ------ __U__________�_-__--_-------- -------`------ -- --------�-- ------------ 12122104 06:09pm P. 002 Demmber 22. 20(14 Mr. Sieve i.illchau;! linghiu ring rcpt. r4y or liclina 4801 w. $nm tit, I'dina. Minn. 55.124 Dear Mr. 1ANchang, I am writing as a resident of Edina at 5325 HahMm Ave. Sn. regnrdinL, the proposed imlirnv0111011 s to I lalilil..x Ave. mid the sm•romiding area. Several weeks agn one of* my neighbors circulated a petition regarding the addition ol'sidewulks to the proposed improvements. I signmi the petition as I undmolnod that the improvements issue had already been decided by the city council and to add sidewalk~ would he a henefil to the neighborhood. I nfitt•lunarely I acted premalurcly. I have since examined these ismies and hnvo decided At I wnnld not suppnrl sidewalks and would like to sce Curther discussion regalydiog 1114 Proposed upgrade Io the street. It is obvious that I lulilitx Ave. needs repair. II is I'airly heavily U•aveled its it always has hoer, but 1 also believe aver living, here 11111. So many years than the city hus beau slow to make repairs and to resnlvr dr-linnge prohlcros. II would seem reasonable for the city to at (cast consider au td offer other less exprngivc choices Cot our ncighhmtood that would remove pntholes and make the street more visually appealing'. I have• spent many hours walking and running this street and have raised a child here. with aihpropriotely posted and monitored speed limits I hclicve it is sal'c. As fir the ueed Mor sidevvalks rte' rile safety of mu- children. I bought my home on llahi'm Ave, because the lots are largo and it 017'"nrde.d my child a play urea in our hack yard. I sec no reason to change my opinion now. Sunk you tier asking; ti.tr our input, I n"mehw ncc value heing placed on open alm"m i Wion wHh tha city's residents especially when it involve~ significant assessmeuts. Sincerely. 4k 0 ' .1 Kathy 0,1 1 4 January 14, 2005 Mr. Wayne Houle Director of Engineering City of Edina 4801 West 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 RE: 5032 — 5337 Halifax Ave. So. Dear Mr. Houle: We, residents of Halifax Ave., hereby submit this petition to the City of Edina to let you know of our wishes regarding the petition submitted in December to the Edina City Council that requested sidewalks along Halifax Ave. between 518` and 54th Streets. We believe sidewalks along this stretch of Halifax are unnecessary and we wish to file the enclosed petition to the city NOT to construct sidewalks along Halifax Avenue. We would appreciate knowing in a timely manner any future meeting relating to this issue so that our voice can be heard. Sincerely, Your neighbors on Halifax Avenue r s 3 5 7 4 I Petition A petition was submitted to the Edina City Council in December 2004 requesting sidewalks along Halifax Avenue between 51St and 54th Streets. We believe sidewalks along this stretch of Halifax Avenue are unnecessary. We, the undersigned, petition the city NOT to construct sidewalks along Halifax Ave. Print Name Address Signature Date Phone K4ZJ f� y� / �Y U / ✓ a� 702 �J ; � C S" 6/x-730 -L?00/ i 95-2 Nw�s f3 f -g -�� S�Z ��� ��`7 54 Au 1'��OlJ� L��- -5- Gr Sharon pe 9�z_f�- A%At 01/08/2005 r I M 4 2Z z3 �y zS -1.7 Petition A petition was submitted to the Edina City Council in December 2004 requesting sidewalks along Halifax Avenue between 51St and 54th Streets. We believe sidewalks along this stretch of Halifax Avenue are unnecessary. We, the undersigned, petition the city NOT to construct sidewalks along Halifax Ave. Print Name Address Signature Date Phone � � hets C'���1 � X65 -l�ccl i-�tX e I-6� , K�lk� We M1 h Y /c 0 eA) fa r�� b t- 96 7 01/08/2005 C� s� r3 /y i5 lit, 11 Ig Zd 41 Petition A petition was submitted to the Edina City Council in December 2004 requesting sidewalks along Halifax Avenue between 51s` and 54"' Streets. We believe sidewalks along this stretch of Halifax Avenue are unnecessary. We, the undersigned, petition the city NOT to construct sidewalks along Halifax Ave. Print Name Address Signature. Date Phone V�'QG.IG��� S�� 1 I��t�ix 1, G�i` d O��G� -/ /,S 9SZ_Gl72��``r� Y7 ---I I 13 1 0 �i� `' 110105 �5�• yap -�`�/ ��44�f0.vtp P1�0.1Jer5o �,�e�..�.P-��. �Z ► �� cam, so � � 9s� get, r M 2s q r�,�c w j1\ "C('k n lb� yzts }I i i �� S ` z I (��- 4�c I j / 0 MI 5 Z °I t1 - ► S I s ;? H, f. j-L�,� G /t 01/08/2005 S Pagel of 2 Wayne Houle To: Molly Schomburg Subject: RE: Halifax Ave. Sidewalk Molly: Thank you for your email and letter, both will be forwarded to the City Council for review. Our recommendation to place the sidewalk was based on the topography including impacts to existing trees along Halifax Avenue and also the connection point at West 51 Street and Halifax Avenue. I'm sorry that someone was injured at this location but this crossing does have an enhanced pedestrian crossing and it is very difficult to restrict people to only crossing at West 50 Street since there is no barricades along this route. Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Direct 952 - 826 -0443 Fax 952 - 826 -0389 whoule @ci.edina.mn.us . www.cityofedina.com From: Molly Schomburg [ mailto :mollys @TheLawlorGroup.com] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 8:59 AM To: Wayne Houle Subject: Halifax Ave. Sidewalk Mr. Houle, I am attaching a letter to you for your review. Please acknowledge that you have received this and let me know your thoughts. You may call me at my office at 952 - 288 -2540 or at my home at 952 - 929 -4926. Thank you for your consideration. Molly Schomburg 5329 Halifax Ave. So. It's not too late to sign up for your FREE subscriptions to both The Lawlor Review and'our new e- newsletter, Lawlor Focus. Go to www.thelawlorgroup.com today to sign up for both. Molly T. Schomburg The Lawlor Group, Inc. 6400 Flying Cloud Drive Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Direct: 952- 288 -2540 Main: 952- 922 -6291 8/21/2007 Page 2 of I Toll Free: 800- 972 -4345 8/21/2007 August 20, 2007 Mr. Wayne Houle City of Edina 4801 West 50"' Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Houle, I attended the informational meeting regarding the Halifax Avenue Sidewalk project last week and I have some concerns with the concept of the sidewalk being located on the east side of the street. During that meeting I heard several times that the main reason that sidewalks were even considered on Halifax was for the safety of pedestrians. It seems to me that if that is primarily your goal it would be better to locate the sidewalk on the west side of the street in order to tie in with the sidewalk already installed on the west side of the 5000 block of Halifax. This would force people to walk to the controlled intersection on 50th and Halifax to cross the street and would avoid the dangerous crosswalk located on 51 st Street. On August 2 °d a pedestrian was hit and injured by a car while crossing in the crosswalk. Also, my property, located at 5329 Halifax is unique in the sense that my garage is located on the lower level of my lot, and the only access to my backyard is through the front yard. If a sidewalk were put in, a retaining wall would have to be built in front of my house which would take away the gradual grade of the lot and be virtually impossible for someone to push a mower, etc. up the hill. I would appreciate someone from the city taking a second look at this issue. I would also like to know if a cost comparison was done when determining which side of the street the sidewalk should be placed on. It seems to me that there will be several retaining walls that will need to be built in order to put the sidewalk on the east side at the cost to the residents on Halifax Ave. whereas not as many, if any, on the west side. I hope to hear from you after you have read and reviewed the issues I have presented. Sincerely, Molly T. Schomburg J Page 1 of 1 Wayne Houle From: Mark Lenss [mark.lenss @denalimarketing.com] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 9:53 AM To: Wayne Houle Cc: Lenss, Sheila (MN66) Subject: Halifax Sidewalk Attachments: City of Edina Letter.doc Dear Wayne — Please see the attached letter in opposition to the planned sidewalk on Halifax Avenue. Thank you for taking the time to read our concerns. Sincerely, Sheila and Mark Lenss 5115 Halifax Avenue So. Mark Lenss Managing Partner Denali ioo South Fifth Street Suite 2000 Minneapolis, MN 55402 P 612- 455-7405 M 612 -382 -5592 F 612- 455 -7401 mark.lenss@denalimarketing.com 8/21/2007 y A d e n a I i M APKF "w r,.El EVA T En 8/21/2007 y Mr. Wayne D. Houle, P.E. Director of Public Works City Engineer City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Dear Mr. Houle, My wife and I live at 5115 Halifax Avenue South and want to formally acknowledge our strong opposition to the plan to install sidewalk on Halifax Avenue. Our opposition has more to do with the affect on the beauty of Halifax and the neighborhood than the financial assessment, although no one wants to pay for something they absolutely do not want to see in their yard. We believe that a sidewalk cutting through the well maintained yards on Halifax will dramatically impact the beauty of our neighborhood. As we understand it the increasing level of traffic on Halifax is the main reason for a sidewalk being considered. We would propose alternative solutions to reduce or eliminate the cutting through of traffic attempting to avoid 50th & France. We have seen not only increasing traffic but more importantly increasing speeds of that traffic, yet no one seems willing to address the traffic or the speed of it. Please, we urge you and the city to reconsider this project and the solution for the problem. Sincerely, Mark & Sheila Lenss 5115 Halifax Avenue J Page 1 of 2 Wayne Houle From: Lenss, Sheila (MN66) [sheila.lenss @honeywell.com] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 9:56 PM . To: Mark Lenss; Wayne Houle Subject: RE: Halifax Sidewalk Dear Wayne I would like to re- emphasize the concern about the high traffic through Halifax that new sidewalks will not address. That is the main issue here. You need to sit in our driveway and see how many are using Halifax as a cut through ... and at very high speeds. It hinders people being in their yards, walking across the street to be neighborly, biking, backing out of our driveways, etc. All the new buildings and projects have dramatically increased the traffic in the 50th/ Franc area. It is not safe allowing Halifax as a cut through like it is. Sidewalks are not the answer. There are large trees that we don't want to lose on the street either which even working sidewalks around them will lower the aesthetic appeal significantly. Some years back we understand there was a proposal to put barriers at the end of Halifax & 51 st and keep the traffic flowing around the curve behind Lunds. We would very much be in support of this. While it would be a little inconvenient with that configuration for us to get to our home, the benefits far exceed any other solution, including the sidewalks. We would support that solution plus it would be easier to implement and far less expensive for all. Please do not put sidewalks on our beautiful street. Our lots are small enough as it is. Let it keep its all American, home town charm. Pleasell Sincerely, Sheila Lenss 952 - 270 -5473 From: Mark Lenss [mailto: mark. lenss@denalimarketing.com] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 9:53 AM To: whoule @ci.edina.mn.us Cc: Lenss, Sheila (MN66) Subject: Halifax Sidewalk Dear Wayne — Please see the attached letter in opposition to the planned sidewalk on Halifax Avenue. Thank you for taking the time to read our concerns. Sincerely, Sheila and Mark Lenss 5115 Halifax Avenue So. Mark Lenss Managing Partner Denali loo South Fifth Street Suite 2000 Minneapolis, MN 55402 P 612- 455 -7405 M 612 -382 -5592 8/21/2007 Page 2 of 2 F 612- 455 -7401 mark.lenss@denalimarketing.com 8/21/2007 denali M Aft .RELING. €LE VAT ED 8/21/2007 Dear Neighbor, Re: Special sidewalk assessment 0 The City of Edina proposes the installation of a new 4' wide concrete sidewalk on Halifax Ave from 51" Street to 54h Street. The boulevard width will vary to go around as many trees as possible and retaining walls will be used to limit impacts on yards with steep grades. The Public Works Dept will recommend this project, unless there is major opposition by homeowners on Halifax Ave (a letter to Mr. Wayne Houle, the Director of Public Works /City of Edina would suffice). Each of the 63 residents along Halifax Ave will be assessed $1,520,plus a possible cost overrun of up to 10 %. Future maintenance costs and upkeep will be borne by homeowners. Please note that time is of essence! H. Loeffler 5125 Halifax Ave Cc: attachment Page 1 of 2 Wayne Houle From: Deb Mangen Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 10:32 AM To: Wayne Houle Subject: FW: Halifax Avenue Sidewalks Wayne, I will forward you any correspondence I receive regarding items for which you're holding a hearing. Deb From: Laura Fulton Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 10:24 AM To: 'jhovland @krauserollins.com'; 'Immasica @aol.com'; 'ANN SWENSON'; 'Housh, Scot; 'jonibennettl2 @comcast.net' Cc: Deb Mangen Subject: FW: Halifax Avenue Sidewalks From: Marsha Buchok [mailto:marbuchok @gmail.com] Sent: Monday, August 20, 2007 10:22 AM To: Laura Fulton Subject: Halifax Avenue Sidewalks To: Linda Masica and City Council Members: Re: Halifax Avenue Sidewalks I was able to attend the Halifax Avenue sidewalk proposal public hearing on August 15th. I heard both pro's and con's regarding the "sidewalk issue ", and as I look at it, the "short- term" and "long- term" view points. I support the "long- term" viewpoint of proposed sidewalks on Halifax Avenue. I agree that they create a safe alternative to walking on our busy street. I like the idea of linking the neighborhood to parks and shopping areas. I believe that they will encourage more walking as well as promote neighborhood "gathering ". A couple of items to consider as the council proceeds: 1.) Include sidewalks on both the east and west side of the street. I took a walk down Maple Road the other day and I liked the balance and ambience of sidewalks on both sides of the street. It encourages pedestrian traffic on both the east and west side of the street and it will remove the "fairness" issue of who gets them and who doesn't.... 2.) Install new street lights. Again, when I walked down Maple Road I noticed design specific street lamp posts that reflect a "small town" feel. These would look very nice on Halifax Avenue. 3.) Landscaping and maintenance. Many of our neighbors expressed concern about how the sidewalks will impact the front of their yard. Will trees be cut down? What if I have an elevated landscape? Who will maintain the sidewalks? I think it's important to inform and educate the residents on these 8/22/2007 a Page 2 of 2 concerns. An elevated drawing of the proposed "finished project" would be helpful for all of us that are visual learners. As I read the article in the Sunday paper, I agree with Wayne Houle, Director of Edina Public Works when he was quoted... "usually people oppose them at the start, but enjoy them once they're in." I will not be able to attend the Sept 4th council hearing as I will be out of town. Thanks for your time and effort on this matter. As I left the hearing and reflected on the evening discussion I thought, isn't it wonderful that people care so much about their neighborhoods! Marsha Buchok Halifax Avenue resident marbuchok@grnail.com 8/22/2007 Petition A petition was submitted to the Edina City Council in December 2004 requesting sidewalks along Halifax Avenue between 51'` and 54th Streets. We believe sidewalks along this stretch of Halifax Avenue are unnecessary. Vise, the undersigned, petition the city-NOT to construct sidewalks along Halifax Ave. Print Name Address Signature Date Phone CC' en, Fi --!For 1141 5��6 VAr)-liF xAuo' 7 I BIO, 9-<:a- w -s►sb o Of -r ��► �� � l b� Il `�� Z' lad r i:;L 7 L 4 y j j r �.. �' p�� �y` /�, y • '^- C ,� / !� 333 �r♦,'� it -ia -oS �a ia7o5� 9 N1,c;rI ��091 l,�,c �� �o / —/Z -off 9�'�7 A V rhe I 01/08/2005 Co! 7 City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina MN 55424 Attn. Mr. Wayne Houle Director of Public Works Dear Sir, Aug 21,2007 I reside at 5125 Halifax Ave South in Edina and both my wife and I are against installing a sidewalk on the east side of Halifax Ave. As you can see by the attached photo, please note the location of the large tree where the proposed sidewalk would be installed. Further note that part of my paver driveway, and all of the adjacent concrete apron would have to be reworked. Because of the topography of the land on the eastside of Halifax Ave (across from 51S` Street and 54th Street) numerous retaining walls will need to be build. People are concerned about the future steepness of the new driveways, especially across from 51 st Street. It would be less expensive to build a side walk on the west side, or better yet, to reduce traffic on Halifax by preventing turns off 52 "a and 54th street during rush hour. Would you please forward this letter to the City Council Thank you Hans & Katherine Loeffler August 22, 2007 Dear Mayor Hovland: I am writing to express my concern over the sidewalk proposed for the front of our home at 5105 Halifax. I acknowledge the opinions of some residents and the City regarding pedestrian safety on-Halifax. Furthermore, I concede that sidewalks on Halifax may be inevitable given increased traffic, increased populations of children on the street and the constant flow of behemoth construction trucks. Unfortunately, the process of installing the sidewalk will negatively impact the access to our property. Our driveway is infamous for being the most treacherous on Halifax. It is difficult to negotiate under optimal conditions due to its length, steep grade, and sheer drop -off on the south side. My husband assiduously shovels, scrapes, and applies chemicals to the driveway to keep it passable in the winter because we cannot find a contractor who will accept the job of snow removal. They claim it is too steep, narrow, has a drop -off, and there is no place for them to deposit the snow at the top. I understand from a meeting with Jamie from engineering that perhaps 16 feet or more of the driveway will have to be cut back and reconstructed to accommodate the walk and boulevard. That will leave us with a shorter distance to reach the crest of the hill where the drive levels out. Additionally, Jamie predicted there would be a retaining wall across the front of the property which would meet the driveway on its north side thereby creating another obstacle to negotiate when entering. Manipulating a vehicle under that circumstance would be difficult under optimal conditions and hazardous with even insignificant winter precipitation. Jamie also predicted that another retaining wall would be necessary along the length of the north side of the drive in order to accommodate the changes to the slope of the driveway. You can see that we are potentially faced with formidable access issues to our property. I invite you to visit our home in order to appreciate the full scope of the conditions I have described. I ask that if you rule in favor of a sidewalk on Halifax that you assign it to the west side. There are 6 homeowners on the east side (3 on each end of the proposed project) whose driveway challenges will be exacerbated in the process of sidewalk installation. These would be permanent barriers imposed which impact our safety. Results of the December,2004 petition show only 6 of 29 residences on the east side favor sidewalks. I expect that if our Halifax neighbors realized the hardship that sidewalks would impose on a few they would concur that a west side installation would make more sense. Thank you for your attention to our dilemma and ask that if you decide to support sidewalks on Halifax that you will consider the long -term impact on all the stakeholders. SEAL 952- 926 -7378 AVG 2 4 2001 RECENED August 26, 2007 Mr. Jack Sullivan City of Edina 4801 West 50'h Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Sullivan, This letter is regarding the proposed Halifax Avenue Sidewalk. I met with Jamie Cynor from the city to look at my front yard and driveway today. My property has a significant grade and would require cutting into and placing of a retaining wall. My driveway is difficult at best to negotiate as it is currently and would only be made more difficult by the presence of a sidewalk and retaining wall. Removal of snow from both the driveway and sidewalk are a foreseeable problem. There is a question of how and where to put the snow. Additionally there is the question of liability for injury on a snowy and or icy sidewalk on a hill. Many of the people who live on Halifax Ave would be considered senior citizens. In many cases maintaining a sidewalk in front of their property would be a hardship. The information I received indicated that the primary reason for this sidewalk construction was safety. To the best of my knowledge there have been no incidences of personal injury to a pedestrian on this street except where there was a controlled crosswalk at 51 s' and Halifax. Apparently the crosswalk did little to help the individual hit. It has been indicated that the level of traffic on Halifax would indicate the need for a sidewalk. I question the accuracy of the count taken. It is estimated the street, curb, and gutters will be redone in 2013. Has the cost of replacing the sidewalk due to damage by that construction been taken into consideration? Are homeowners required to pay for a sidewalk twice? The sidewalk proposal is for the construction to take place on the east side of Halifax Avenue. It would appear that a sidewalk on the east side of Halifax would be far more expensive. I am not in favor of the sidewalk proposal. Many people agree with me and some are in favor of a sidewalk. However it seems no one wants the sidewalk on their side of the street. I appreciate your consideration of my opinion on the proposed Halifax Ave Sidewalk. Sincere ,- l Slier a ieYce cc:- Linda Masica, Wayne Houle Sheila Pierce 5333 Halifax Ave S Edina, MN 55424 August 26, 2007 Mr. Jack Sullivan City of Edina 4801 West 50' Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Sullivan, This letter is regarding the proposed Halifax Avenue Sidewalk. I met with Jamie Cynor from the city to look at my front yard and driveway today. My property has a significant grade and would require cutting into and placing of a retaining wall. My driveway is difficult at best to negotiate as it is currently and would only be made more difficult by the presence of a sidewalk and retaining wall. Removal of snow from both the driveway and sidewalk are a foreseeable problem. There is a . question of how and where to put the snow. Additionally there is the question of liability for injury on a snowy and or icy sidewalk on a hill. Many of the people who live on Halifax Ave would be considered senior citizens. In many cases maintaining a sidewalk in front of their property would be a hardship. The information I received indicated that the primary reason for this sidewalk construction was safety. ' To the best of my knowledge there have been no incidences of personal injury to a pedestrian on this street except where there was a controlled crosswalk at 51' and Halifax. Apparently the crosswalk did little to help the individual hit. It has been indicated that the level of traffic on Halifax would indicate the need for a sidewalk. I question the accuracy of the count taken. It is estimated the street, curb, and gutters will be redone in 2013. Has the cost of replacing the sidewalk due to damage by that construction been taken into consideration? Are homeowners required to pay for a sidewalk twice? The sidewalk proposal is for the construction to take place on the east side of Halifax Avenue. It would appear that a sidewalk on the east side of Halifax would be far more expensive. I am not in favor of the sidewalk proposal. Many people agree with me and some are in favor of a sidewalk. However it seems no one wants the sidewalk on their side of the street. I appreciate your consideration of my opinion on the proposed Halifax Ave Sidewalk. Sincerely, Sheila C. Pierce cc: Linda MWa, Wayne Houle i Page I of I Wayne Houle From: Laura Fulton Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 12:49 PM To: Wayne Houle Subject: FW: Halifax Av. Sidewalks - --------- From: idesofaug@aol.com [mailto:idesofaug@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 12:37 PIVI Subject: Halifax Av. Sidewalks Dear Mr. Houle, I am in favor of sidewalks on both sides of Halifax Av. between 51st St. and 54th St. Our family has lived at 5324 Halifax Av. for 21 yrs. Sidewalks,would increase safety for pedestrians in the neighborhood. We have many walkers and a small hill and curve on our street. They will also increase a sense of neighbo , rhood by encouraging walking with decreased danger, particularly for the many children on our block. We no longer have children living at home but feel sidewalks will add to the spirit of community. Thank you very much. Anne Bishop 5324 Halifax Av. — ------ -- -- Email and AIM finally together. You've gotta check out free AOL Mail! 8/29/2007 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATIONAL MEETING DONCASTER WAY HALIFAX AVENUE SIDEWALK PROJECTS Improvement Nos. S -092 & S -100 August 15, 2007 408 CITY OF EDINA Input Opportunities z USE POST -IT NOTES AND PLACE ON MAP C) WRITE DOWN ON COMMENT CARDS :) TELL US / PHONE US :D WRITE US/ EMAIL US :) SPEAK AT PUBLIC HEARING 3 -1=0ITV OF MMA Typical Process (continued) Ordering of improvement project requires a majority of Council if petitioned by residents (normally 3 of 5 Council votes if >35% signatures of assessed properties) or 4 of 5 Council votes if project is not initiated by residents (or lacking 35% signatures). • Levy of special assessments is typically held at the completion of the project through a Final Assessment Hearing. C;" OF EDINA Agenda INTRODUCTIONS HISTORY OF PROJECTS PROJECT -PLANS -COSTS -ASSESSMENTS WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE? Typical Process • Initiation of improvement project by Council (staff) or by petition. • Feasibility Report prepared and accepted by Council. • Ten days notice is sent to affected property owners and legal notice is placed in paper (Edina Sun) prior to the hearing. • Public hearing to order the project is then conducted. CITY OF EDINA r ^'�{ _. [F1 . • .. Project Area ..• "�' tt1'. Doncaster Way 4 +� l 1 >i 'I �� R F- •F� �: CITY Of £DIN► Project History / Initiation Doncaster Way • Project initiated by residents through petition (Received January 2003) Information letter sent to residents (October 17, 2003) Several "objections" and "non- supporting" letters received from several residents of neighborhood. (2003 - 2007) CITY OF EDINA Highlands School Walking Zone City of EdI- Hiphl.nd. School Rout Pl.n M.p UM CITY OF EDINA Plan view Doncaster Way CITY OF EDINA City Sidewalk Policy an Doncaster Way • Sidewalk falls within "School Walking Zone ". • Sidewalks on streets with volumes over 750 veh /day qualify. • Sidewalk maintained by City iii Project Scope CITY OF EDINA Doncaster Way • Construct 5 -foot wide boulevard style sidewalk along Doncaster Way from Vernon Ave /Tracy Ave to Ayrshire Boulevard iR CITY OF EDINA Project Issues Doncaster Way • Issues /concerns we do know about: • Safety concerns for pedestrians • Not all residents are in favor of sidewalk. • High volume of school traffic on Doncaster (1500 vehicles per day) • Large tree in boulevard area along Doncaster Way (5519 D -step) • Additional maintenance with sidewalks (City will maintain this portion of sidewalk) CITY OF EDINA _. Support vs. Non - support r Doncaster Way N U! clTr of EDaA �! Project Area Halifax Avenue C'•.X� a��,� ;;� -'��'. � lf,r��Mp � A . ll )SK 'C 017— f; a9i'��yl ism CITY OF EDINA City Sidewalk Policy Halifax Avenue • Sidewalk falls within "Business District Walking Zone ". • Sidewalks on streets with volumes over 750 veh /day qualify. • Sidewalk is not maintained by City. us CITY U • „A Project Costs Doncaster Way • Project cost: $ 93,800 • Notes: - Sidewalk along Vernon Ave will be funded using Municipal State Aid moneys (Gas Tax $$) Ire CITY OF EDINA Project History / Initiation Halifax Avenue • Project initiated by residents through petition. (Received December 2004) • Several "objections” and "non- supporting" letters received from several residents of neighborhood. (2004 & 2005) CITY Of EUIKA Project Scope Halifax Avenue • Construct 4 -foot wide boulevard style sidewalk along Halifax Avenue from West 54th Street to West 51st Street. 8 CITY OF EOINA Plan view Halifax Avenue L.- bit (`.1T•." OF z7lm A � j I I Support vs. Non-support- Halifax Avenue i j i• I i Assessment Policy Methodoloav - Neiahborhood sidewalks: • Based on residential equivalent unit (REU) • Single family home is 1 REU • School Zone assessment policy (Doncaster) -This method has been used for other sidewalk projects within Edina -School pays 25% -City pays 25% -Residents pay 50% of remaining balance Project Issues Halifax Avenue Issues /concerns we do know about: • Safety concerns for pedestrians • Not all residents are in favor of sidewalk. • High volume of traffic on Halifax ■ 900 veh /day south W 52nd St • 1150 vehlday north of W 52nd St • Boulevard trees and some steep slopes in boulevard area along Halifax Avenue. • Additional maintenance for homeowners CITY OF EOINA Project Costs Halifax Avenue • Project cost: $ 127,500 Assessment Policy Methodology - Neighborhood sidewalks Neighborhood sidewalks: • Business District assessment policy (Halifax) -This method has been used for other sidewalk projects within Edina -City pays 25% -Residents pay 75% of remaining balance ;UM CITY OF MNA Proposed Assessments Doncaster Way • Preliminary Estimated Assessment is not final - will be adjusted based on final construction cost. $ 190 per residential equivalent unit • 3 year assessment Approximately 6.5 % interest on unpaid balance Proposed Assessments Doncaster Way _d CPY. 3, eDINA Proposed Assessor its Halifax Avenue - ighlands School talking Zone city of Edina Highlands School Route Plan Map _ _ ..4-. Proposed Assessments Halifax Avenue • Preliminary Assessment is not final - will be adjusted based on final construction cost. • $ 1,520 per residential equivalent unit • 3 year assessment • Approximately 6.5 % interest on unpaid balance ,0 CITY OF EDINA � Project Schedules Council Orders Public Hearing .........Aug 7, 2007 'Jeighborhood Informational Mtg ..... Aug 15, 200 Receive Feasibility Report ...............Aug 21, 2007 Public Hearing ..... ...........................Sept 4, 2007 'f City Council orders project: Bid Opening ... .........................Winter 2007/2008 Award Contract ...................... Winter 2007/2008 Begin Construction . .........................Spring 2008 Complete Construction ..................Summer 2008 5 13® CITY OF ®IDdA - QuestlOns • Issues /concerns we don't know about? ■ Please forward comments to us. ■ Let us know your issues. Thank you for attending! Sign -in Sheet Halifax Avenue Sidewalk Open House August 15, 2007 Name Address Phone No. ✓S a� q2-o6 - 73'78 52 ? z- q 7_ 2 —! y I 02, y� ^, re 5 �Z `1 s-L - °126 vo %�-A s c, n 52 Lt A ze sg 2 Z`7 h - � S � gD127 - G} lcociU 6 - L1 / 7- Sign -in Sheet Halifax Avenue Sidewalk Open House August 15, 2007 Name Address Phone N . -' - 3 15 QUESTION/ COMMENT CARD R4E GAfLblM iJ A L-IFAX A vK 5; tjof A4-%C' -T-:?60 9AL:TF4X - WE ye-rc- A JYN r'N rhA��2,iAL �(L���,u-rc� q�' TkE S pre) Afy- ,ArSaNQL w-F /fAf 1J rRvolt OP 71YE_ SZ �cwnLtt. ?� S i 5 l� €cT. i, W �W A%TRcI�cD ?(,!C ca.%Rt poi CchGt w -.lt-: STEVE LLSLL 1-PU614 ( 'D- wNC XE Z -1N -15-4- cb D -C wt? k- AsvD Name �T( �����- Address 3© D ",Q L F a PLEASE PRINT /ri E E AIA N PLEASE PRINT QUESTION / COMMENT CARD Name Address PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT vwl ivho? *1a tqlx f il,6�zij- -on -5F �-- i Pe4*1 ... PLEASE PRINT e.-e. jfeJ)ejj ml�h QUESTION / COMMENT CARD PLEASE PRINT Name Address PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT QUESTION / COMMENT CARD d1VIc cUj?S�---e-7 nA/LY11 Name 1 y_ .n, -7i-- I U n PLEASE PRINT - � - • _ Address S 2y J t lI) 4z� .. -A ac PLEASE PRINT QUESTION / COMMENT CARD 5 Name��R 0 Y-e,S Address S-2- 3 Z- PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF MAILING NOTICE I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified acting City Clerk of the City of Edina, Minnesota, hereby certify that on the following date, August 17, 2007, acting on behalf of said City, I deposited in the United States mail copies of the attached Notice of Public Hearing for Halifax Avenue Sidewalk (Exhibit A), enclosed in sealed envelopes, with postage thereon duly prepaid, addressed to the persons at the addresses as shown on the mailing list (Exhibit B), attached to the original hereof, which list is on file in my office, said persons being those appearing on the records of the County Auditor as owners of the property listed opposite their respective names, as of a date 16 days prior to the date of the hearing; and that I also sent said notice to the following corporations at the indicated addresses whose property is exempt from taxation and is therefore not carried on the records of said County Auditor. NAME City of Edina WITNE S my hand and the seal of said ADDRESS 4801 W. 501h St., Edina, MN 55424 City thi9Q 1./1' day of ME X P - Loa, NO- 61.16 Wo � 1. R August 17, 2007 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING HALIFAX AVENUE SIDEWALK (FROM 51 STREET TO 54 STREET) IMPROVEMENT S -100 City of Edina The Edina City Council will meet at Edina City Hall, on Tuesday, September 4, 2007 at 7:00 p.m., to consider the proposed improvements for the Halifax Avenue Sidewalk. This hearing is being conducted under the authority granted by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. This hearing has been called as a recommendation from staff. The proposed project would be constructed in the summer of 2008 with the assessment hearing occurring in 2009. The estimated assessable cost is $95,504.61. The cost will be funded by special assessment. The estimated cost per assessable lot is $1,600.00 per residential equivalent unit. These assessments can be divided over a three -year period with interest accumulating on the unpaid balance. The area proposed to be assessed the cost of the proposed improvement includes the following: 5100 to 5337 Halifax Avenue Your receipt of this notice is an indication that property whose ownership is listed to you is among those properties which are considered to be benefited by the improvement. The City Council can authorize the proposed project immediately upon the close of the hearing. City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 -826 -0379 Easy Peel Labels i bee instruction Sneet i p�usl i Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5960*" NR iFeed Paper �� for Easy Peel Feature 1 �AVERY� 5960T 1 1 1802824410058 THOMAS M FLETCHER PATRICIA L FLETCHER 5137 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824410074 LYNDA CARLSO CHRISTOPHER CARLSO 5105 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824410087 SCOTT M BORENE 5117 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 j 1802824410098 RICHARD P RADDER 5129 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 824410 2J CAR S ILLING 5036 H AVE EDIN N55 4 1802824410109 WENDY K PEARDOT 5108 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824410112 MARY JO PORTER BENNETT J PORTER III 5120 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824410260 HENLEY DEV CO 2201 WEST RIVER RD N MINNEAPOLIS MN 55411 1802824440033 EAEA HALIFAX LLC BAHA HALIFAX LLC 7326 BANCROFT WAY INVER GROVE HEIGHTS MN 55077 1802824440038 MARY R THATCHER DAVID THATCHER 5309 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 V J � l � I O \t V' 1802824410059 SEAN P MULCAHY 5619 W LAKE ST ST LOUIS PARK MN 55424 1802824410075 RONALD POBIEL MONA POBIEL 5109 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824410089 SARAH F VANWINKLE NICHOLAS A VANWINKLE 5121 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824410073 BETTY L HEIAM ARTHUR L HEIAM 5101 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824410078 SHEILA NOONAN 5115 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824410094 HANS J LOEFFLER 5125 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 0282441 0 �1 8244101 LI JOI,F���jjjSON '5 3 EL MOND DAVI �HNSON 5032 AX AVE 5028 AL AVE EDI M 5424 EDI A MN 5 4 T 802824410 7 1802824410108 C Y H HILLING ROSEANNE S KIM 503 IFAX AVE H DANIEL KIM EDlljl 55424 5104 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824410110 1802824410111 DAVID E MAETZOLD ETHEL C DUNN 5114 HALIFAX AVE 5116 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824410113 1802824410114 TRACY H STRECKENBACH ROGER A NASH SCOTT C STRECKENBACH NANCY S NASH 5124 HALIFAX AVE 5128 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824440031 1802824440032 MOLLY T SCHOMBURG KATHLEEN A O'DEA 5329 HALIFAX AVE DANIEL F O'DEA EDINA MN 55424 5325 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824440036 1802824440037 ROBERTA K JOHNSTON MARK C WATERLOO 5317 HALIFAX AVE ELIZABETH J WATERLOO EDINA MN 55424 5313 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824440039 1802824440040 HARTLEY JOSEPH DRANNEN JENNIFER D DEETS 5305 HALIFAX AVE CHRISTOPHER G DEETS EDINA MN 55424 5301 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 ttiquettes faciles a peter ♦ Consultez la feuille www.avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 5960""` Sens de chargement d'instruction 1- 800 -GO -AVERY Easy Peel Labels Paper zec in5imuion 3nee► I � for Easy Peel Feature gVERY ®5960*"' Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5960Tm 1Feed 1 �J � 1802824440041 1802824440044 1802824440047 NANCY M WATSON CITY OF EDINA JOYCE O BREKKE 5241 HALIFAX AVE 4801 W 50TH ST DEVERE G BREKKE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 5221 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824440048 1802824440049 1802824440050 HARLAND HALVORSON MARIE C MCDONOUGH DONALD W CURTIS JR 5217 HALIFAX AVE BERT M MCDONOUGH 5209 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 5213 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824440051 1802824440053 1802824440054 JULIE A AMSDEN ROMA KANSARA CHARLES SCHNEIDER 5205 HALIFAX AVE DEVANSHU V KANSARA ANGELA SCHNEIDER EDINA MN 55424 5201 HALIFAX AVE 5200 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824440055 1802824440056 1802824440057 PETER J BALOGH NICK J DZANDZARA D WAYNE WENGER MARY E BALOGH JILL C ROCHELEAU CAROLYN A WENGER 5204 HALIFAX AVE 5208 HALIFAX AVE 5212 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824440058 1802824440059 1802824440060 TED A ALLEN RALPH OIE LINDA S SMABY KAREN M SEAY CLAIRE E OIE JOHN S SMABY 5216 HALIFAX AVE 5220 HALIFAX AVE 5224 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824440061 1802824440062 1802824440063 DUNCAN MCCAMPBELL KEITH J NELSEN STEVEN L DOMKE 5228 HALIFAX AVE KATHERINE E NELSEN LISA M DOMKE EDINA MN 55424 5240 HALIFAX AVE 5236 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824440064 1802824440065 1802824440066 ORLANDO A FLORES JOHN T MEENAN/TRUSTEE V1EM HI TRUONG MARTI J FLORES CHRISTINE M MEENAN/TRUSTEE KIEU N TRUONG 5232 HALIFAX AVE 5300 HALIFAX AVE 5304 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 1802824440067 1802824440068 1802824440069 JACQUELINE S MITHUN KAREL A LAING ROBERT J PECHMAN 5308 HALIFAX AVE 5312 HALIFAX AVE MARIE T PECHMAN EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 5316 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 1802824440070 1802824440071 1802824440072 STEPHEN M DOBBS JOHN R CRIST RITA M PELUSO NICHOLE M DOBBS ANNE M BISHOP GINO A PFL (JSO 5320 HALIFAX AVE 5324 HALIFAX AVE 5328 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 )2824440073 1802824440074 1802824440093 NONA S JOHNSON - HARDING TERESA FORLITI DEL L JOHNSON DAVID R HARDING 5336 HALIFAX AVE 5337 HALIFAX AVE 5332 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 EDINA MN 55424 Etiquettes faciles a peler A Consultez la feuille www.avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 5960'wc Sens de chargement d'instruction 1- 800 -GO -AVERY I Easy Peel Labels A Use Avery@ TEMPLATE 5960Tm jFeed Paper 1802824440095 SHEILA C PIERCE 5333 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 See Instruction Sheet for Easy Peel Feature 1 1802824440100 LISA C HARMENING JEFFREY L HARMENING 5229 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 aAVERY(R)5960ym 1 1802824440101 MARSHA A BLICHOK GEORGE P BLICHOK 5225 HALIFAX AVE EDINA MN 55424 ttiquettes faciles h peler A Consultez la feuille www.avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY® 5960""` Sens de chargement d'instruction 1- 800 -GO -AVERY FUTURE SIDEWALK FINANCING POLICY CITY OF EDINA INTRODUCTION: The City of Edina is experiencing a need to review the financing of future sidewalks and pathways through -out the City. This need came about from recent requests for sidewalks along Maple Road and from Edina School District. This report covers a very aggressive future sidewalk plan and will be included in this year's City Comprehensive Plan. The following describes the thought - process and potential funding mechanisms for these future sidewalks and pathways. PURPOSE: Determine preliminary costs to install sidewalks and pathways within the City. Analyze potential financing policy to fund sidewalks. PROCESS: All sidewalk requests are and will continue to be "petition initiated" with the exception of State -Aid reconstruction routes. PROPOSED SIDEWALK REQUIREMENTS: Currently sidewalks and pathways follow many collector and arterial streets within the City. City staff analyzed the existing pedestrian ways using the following criteria to propose new sidewalks and pathways: • Identify all existing sidewalks• within the City. • Identify all retail business walking zones within the City. • Identify all park walking zones within the City. • Identify all public schools walking zones within the City. • Identify all public transit facilities within the City. • Identify all proposed State -Aid funded sidewalks. Edina School District currently uses a 0.7 mile walking zone policy for elementary schools and 1 mile walking zone for middle and senior high schools. Staff also used the 0.7 mile radius walking zones for all retail business centers, parks, and public elementary schools along with the one mile walking zone radius for middle and senior high schools. Sidewalks and pathways are proposed for both regional type loops and for destination type walks. The regional loops would allow a pedestrian to circle any one of the four quadrants of the City; typically these routes are found along State -Aid Streets. The destination type walks would allow a person living within any of the above walking zones to access these destinations from their residences. Sidewalks and pathways within the City are divided into the following four categories: State -Aid sidewalks and pathways are located adjacent to Municipal State- G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Sidewalks n BikewaysUscellaneous \FUTURE SIDEWALK FINANCING POLICY final.doc Page 1 09/18/98 Aid Streets (MSAS) and are funded from WAS funds. School Zone sidewalks and pathways are identified by the City and Edina School District and are located within the identified school walking zones. Destination Zone sidewalks and pathways are typically located along roadways that are geographically a link between two existing systems and adjacent to a roadway that carries over 750 vehicles per day. Local / Low Volume Street Zone sidewalks and pathways are any sidewalks or pathways that do not meet any of the above definitions. FINANCING: Financing of the proposed sidewalks can be separated into four categories: 1. State -Aid Costs that cover any proposed sidewalk located adjacent to a State - Aid designated roadway. 2. Public School Zone Costs that will be split between City funds, School funds, and Special Property Assessments. 3. Destination Zone Costs that will be split between City funds and Special Property Assessments. 4. Local / Low Volume Street Zone Costs will be financed through Special Property Assessments. Special property assessment policy will be reviewed per each individual project. The City Council will have the discretion to order a project assessed on a per adjacent lot basis, per local area assessment, or a combination of both. City staff recommends the following percentages be used for financing these sidewalks and pathways. The Edina School District staff was given this information last July along with a proposed sidewalk - pathway map. However, due to the individual school Site Councils schedules City staff has not received their comments. G:\ Engineering\ Infrastructure \Streets \Sidewalks n BikewaysUscellaneous\FUTURE SIDEWALK FINANCING POLICY final.doc Page 2 09/18/98 STATE -AID COSTS ENTITY PERCENT OF COST STATE -AID 100 SCHOOL ZONE COSTS ENTITY PERCENT OF COST CITY 25 SCHOOL 25 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 50 DESTINATION ZONE COSTS ENTITY PERCENT OF COST CITY 25 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 75 LOCAL / LOW VOLUME STREET ZONE COSTS ENTITY PERCENT OF COST SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 100 G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Sidewalks n Bikeways \Miscellaneous \FUTURE SIDEWALK FINANCING POLICY final.doc Page 3 09/18/98 These percentages would translate into the following costs: ENTITY TOTAL COST 10 -YR AVERAGE STATE -AID $2,261,000.00 $226,000.00 CITY $495,000.00 $50,000.00 SCHOOL $250,000.00 $25,000.00 SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS $1,114,000.00 $111,000.00 TOTAL $4,120,000.00 $412,000.00 CONCLUSION: The City sidewalk funding policy entails a cost split for any proposed sidewalk that is located on a street with Average Daily Traffic of over 750 vehicles within the' City. Any proposed sidewalk located on a State -Aid route will be financed through State -Aid financing. Any proposed sidewalk located within a public school walking zone will have a cost split between the Residences, School, and City. G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Sidewalks n BikewaysWiscellaneous \FUTURE SIDEWALK FINANCING POLICY final_doc Page 4 09/18/98 CITY OF EDINA TRANSPORTATION PLAN -t A PREPARED BY: 1 `1 f SRF CONSULTING GROUP, INC. One Carlson Parkway North, Suite 150 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55447 (612) 475 -0010 March 1999 SRF No. 0983117 �5 C(:5�Y 16. Use economic and environmentally sound management techniques for snow and ice removal. 17. Replace substandard bridges and bridges that present safety or traffic problems. TransitlTDM 18. Participate in the I -494 Commission to encourage all forms of travel demand management in order to reduce vehicle miles of travel, reduce petroleum consumption, and improve air quality. 19. Review all major new developments in light of the potential for ridesharing including bus accessibility, preferential parking for carpools /vanpools, and mixed -use development. 20. Support HOV bypasses and other preferential treatments for transit and high occupancy vehicles on streets and highways. 21. Include transit planning in the construction or upgrading of streets and highways. 22. Pursue development of a demonstration project to provide a circulator system within _ the Southdale /Centennial Lakes major activity center. Parking 23. Review new developments for adequacy of parking based upon need, the potential for joint use of parking facilities and opportunities to encourage ridesharing. 24. Continue to limit on -street parking in and near congested commercial areas. Pedestrian /Bicycle 25. Provide accessibility to pedestrians and bicycles at major activity centers, including necessary storage facilities. 26. Create pedestrian and bicycle interconnections among major generators, with continuity across major roadways and other barriers. 27. Provide sidewalks and safe crossing in high pedestrian danger areas, including high - traffic streets, commercial areas, areas with transit access and in high density residential locations. City of Edina Transportation Plan 5 March 1999 i 28. Provide adequate signage along all bike paths including areas of conflict with pedestrians and automobile traffic. Goods Movement 29. Serve major truck users and intermodal facilities with good minor arterial access to the metropolitan highway system. Funding and Jurisdiction 30. Pursue and support regional or multi- community funding sources for improvements that provide regional or multi- community benefit 31. Support of research efforts into more efficient and cost - effective management, maintenance and replacement of street surfaces 32. Support governmental jurisdiction over roadways that reflect the role of the roadway in the overall transportation system 33. Develop and support legislation permitting a transportation utility City of Edina Transportation Plan 6 March 1999 • CITY OF EDINA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION POLICY w9 H I►1 • April 2005 -Edina Transportation Commission recommended the FINAL DRAFT on January 6, 2005 for City Council consideration. -Edina City Council action taken on April 5, 2005 — Approved. Pedestrian /Bicycle 1. Provide accessibility to pedestrians and bicycles at major activity centers, including necessary storage facilities. 2. Create pedestrian and bicycle interconnections among major generators, with continuity across major roadways and other barriers. 3. Provide sidewalks and safe crossing in high pedestrian danger areas, including high - traffic streets, commercial areas, areas with transit access, and in high- density residential locations. 4. Provide adequate signage along all bike paths including areas of conflict with pedestrians and automobile traffic. Goods Movement 1. Serve major truck users and intermodal facilities with good minor arterial access to the metropolitan highway system. Funding and Jurisdiction 1. Pursue and support regional or multi- community funding sources for improvements that provide regional or multi - community benefit. 2. Support research efforts into more efficient and cost- effective management, maintenance and replacement of street surfaces. 3. Support governmental jurisdiction over roadways that reflect the role of the roadway in the overall transportation system. 4. Develop and support legislation permitting a transportation utility. In addition to the policies contained in the Transportation Plan. the Edina Transportation Commission has adopted the following policies: Roadway Design 1. Design collector and arterial roadway corridors to be compatible with other transportation modes including transit, bicycle and pedestrian. 2. Encourage beautification of local corridors, where appropriate, with amenities such as boulevard trees, decorative street lighting, and monuments. City of Edina Transportation Policy 4 April 2005 Community Attitude and Interest Survey Executive Summary of Citizen Survey Results Overview of the Methodology The City of Edina conducted a Parks and Recreation Facilities and Services Needs Assessment Survey during September of 2006 to establish priorities for the future development of parks and recreation facilities, programs and services within the community. The survey was designed to obtain statistically valid results from households throughout the City of Edina. The survey was administered by mail. Leisure Vision worked extensively with City of Edina officials in the development of the survey questionnaire. This included holding a series of focus groups and stakeholder interviews with City of Edina elected officials, staff, board members, and community members on August land 3, 2006. This work allowed the survey to be tailored to issues of strategic importance to effectively plan the future system. In September 2006, surveys were mailed to a random sample of 3,000 households in the City of Edina. Approximately three days after the surveys were mailed, each household that received a survey also received an electronic voice message encouraging them to complete the survey. The goal was to obtain a total of at least 500 completed surveys. This goal was far exceeded with a total of 865 surveys being completed. The results of the random sample of 865 households have a 95% level of confidence with a precision of at least +/ -3.4 %. The following pages summarize major survey findings: Executive Summary - 1 '�r • Deed for Parks and recreation Facilities From the list of 27 various parks and recreation facilities, respondents were asked to indicate which ones they and members of their household have a need for. The following summarizes key findings: Six of the 27 parks and recreation facilities had at least 40% of respondent households indicate they have a need for them. These six facilities include: walking and biking trails (86 %), natural areas and wildlife habitats (66 %), 18 and 9 hole golf courses (49 %), playground equipment (45 %), indoor art center (40 %) and indoor fitness and exercise facilities (40 %). Q7. Percentage of Respondent Households That Have a Need for Various Parks and Recreation Facilities by percentage of respondents (multiple choices could be made) Walking and biking trails Natural areas and wildlife habitats 18 and 9 hole golf courses Playground equipment Art center Indoor fitness and exercise facilities Indoor running/walking track Outdoor tennis courts Indoor swimming pools Warming houses Indoor golf dome Indoor playground Outdoor spray pool parks Outdoor hockey rinks Soccer fields Off -leash dog park Indoor hockey and figure skating rink Indoor nature center Senior center Baseball fields Indoor sports facility Indoor basketball and volleyball court Football fields Softball fields Skateboard park Lacrosse fields 0% - -,,,,y j 49% ::145% 40% 40% 3.7% 3':7% 36% 32% 131%:. 28% " 126% 26% 26% �24% 23% 21% x:20% ---I ';19% =::19% 12 %i 12 %? 7% lxavice. Leisure Vision'ETC 1w;1ihUe (November 2006) 86% 66% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Executive Summary - 10 Need For Parks and Recreation Facilities in Edina From the list of 27 parks and recreation facilities, respondents were asked to indicate which ones they and members of their household have .a need for. The graph below shows the estimated number of households in the City of Edina that have a need for various parks and recreation facilities, based on 20,996 households in the City. Wa. Estimated Number of Households in the City of Edina That Have a Need for Various Parks and Recreation Facilities by number of households based on 20,996 households in the City of Edina (Source 2000 US Census) Walking and biking trails Natural areas and wildlife habitats 18 and 9 hole golf courses Playground equipment Art center Indoor fitness and exercise facilities Indoor running/walking track Outdoor tennis courts Indoor swimming pools Warming houses Indoor golf dome Indoor playground Outdoor spray pool parks Outdoor hockey rinks Soccer fields Off -leash dog park Indoor hockey and figure skating rink Indoor nature center Senior center Baseball fields Indoor sports facility Indoor basketball and volleyball court Football fields Softball fields Skateboard park Lacrosse fields 17.994 13.773 10,183 9,469 8,293 8.29$ 7.811 i 7,769 7,685 7.622 6,635 6,425 5.921 5,543 5,501 5,480 5,039 _ ! 4,850 4;304 4,094 3,884 3,884 2,562 2.478 1,533 .' 1,218 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 Scaucc: Lcisnre X'ision'ETC :IJL�iintte (Nox-embcr - 2006+) Executive Summary 7 11 V r Memo To: Deputy Chief Schwartz From: Vince Bongaarts Date: September 25, 2000 Re: Speed 5100 Block Halifax I did a speed /volume survey in the 5200 block of Halifax 4/11/00 to 4/17/00. The average daily traffic volume was 875 vehicles. The 85 percentile speed was 33 mph. Of the 3502 vehicles in the survey 353 or 10% were over 34+ mph. Of the 353 vehicles over 34+ mph, 40 or 1 % were 40+ mph. The 5100 block of Halifax, especially near the Somberg residence at 5104, would have lower speeds due to the proximity of the stop sign at W. 51't Street. • Page 1 Headingl ' Heading2 Heading3 Titlel : Halifax Avenue - 5240 Site: Title2 Date: 07/3' Title3 Interval Mon 30 Tue 31 Wed 1 Thu 2 Fri 3 Sat 4 Sun 5 Weekday Avg. Begin ABN BASB ABN BASB ABN BASB ABN BASB ABN BASB ABN BASB ABN BASB ABN BASB 12:AM s r • * * * ` * * • 4 5 2 2 w 01:00 + r w + + r r + * + 0 1 1 1 • 02:00 * * • s * s ■ * s * 1 1 0 2 r t 03:00 r w + + r s • + r + 1 1 1 1 s s 04:00 * * r ' * • • ` • * 1 0 0 0 • 05:00 * * * * r * r * r * 1 1 1 0 r s 06:00 * * * * * * * * * * 5 3 2 2 • 07:00 r * * * * ` • * + * 19 7 13 9 08:00 r * • * ` * • * • s 14 18 9 14 ` 09:00 * * • * r s • w • * 31 32 22 24 10:00 ` * * * ' r • • 13 32 30 27 13 23 13 32 11:00 ` • ` * * ` • r 21 30 20 22 34 23 21 30 12:PM * * • * * * * • 29 26 22 26 25 28 29 26 01:00 * s • * * * * * 31 26 26 27 18 30 31 26 02:00 * s • w * * + + 28 25 24 25 13 28 28 25 03:00 • * r * ` * * * 26 38 18 33 19 22 26 38 04:00 • * * • + r • * 36 38 36 29 21 31 36 38 05:00 ' * * • ` * r * 33 47 19 42 30 44 33 47 06:00 * * * * ` * ` * 25 35 17 18 19 30 25 35 07:00 s * r * * * • * 24 29 18 24 14 26 24 29 08:00 * * * r * ` ` * 10 26 7 15 18 19 10 26 09:00 • * r * * s * * 11 18 6 8 7 13 11 18 10:00 + r s • * * * * 4 10 4 3 4 3 4 10 11:00 • s * ` * • ` * 2 5 1 8 0 0 2 5 Totals 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 293 385 325 376 286 375 293 385 Combined 0 0 0 0 678 701 661 6' Split % 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 43.2 56.8 46.4 53.6 43.3 56.7 43.2 56.8 AM Peak Hr * * s * * * * * 11:00 10:00 09:00 09:00 11:00 09:00 11:00 10:00 Volume * * * * * * * * 21 32 31 32 34 24 21 32 PM PeakHr r * r • * * * * 04:00 05:00 04:00 05:00 05:00 05:00 04:00 05:00 Volume r * r * • * * * 36 47 36 42 30 44 36 47 � y Data File: Halifax Avenue - 5240 Printed : 8/13/2007 Page : 1 Headin2l Headin;;2 HeadinQ3 Titlel : Halifax Avenue - 5240 Site: Date: 08/06/07 Tttle3 Interval Mon 6 Tue 7 Wed 8 Thu 9 Fri 10 Sat 11 Sun 12 Weekday Avg. Begin ABN BASB ABN BASB ABN BASB ABN BASB ABN BASB ABN BASB ABN BASB ABN BASB 12:AM 0 4 0 5 0 0 0 3 0 2 s s s s 0 2 01:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 * * * * 0 0 02:00 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * * * * 0 0 03:00 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 * * * • 0 0 04:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 * * * * 0 0 05:00 4 3 1 2 0 0 2 2 3 0 * * * * 2 1 06:00 8 4 9 4 0 0 10 6 10 3 * * * * 7 3 07:00 18 20 26 19 0 0 24 17 18 10 * * * * 17 13 08:00 25 21 33 25 0 0 29 15 29 30 * * * * 23 18 09:00 26 34 32 29 0 0 28 21 38 18 • * * * 24 20 10:00 29 22 22 32 17 18 30 21 8 19 * * * " 21 22 11:00 28 32 21 29 23 31 34 30 * * * * * " 26 30 12:PM 37 30 33 24 30 29 33 28 * * * * * " 33 27 01:00 25 25 26 36 31 31 25 32 * • * * * " 26 31 02:00 39 30 26 34 26 28 21 41 * * * * • * 28 33 03:00 28 45 1 3 32 31 23 27 • * * " • * 21 26 04:00 35 39 0 0 42 42 22 36 * * * * * * 24 29 05:00 22 49 0 0 38 42 37 59 " * * * * " 24 37 06:00 28 49 0 0 33 33 25 35 " * * * * * 21 29 07:00 20 32 0 0 20 39 17 33 " * * * * * 14 26 08:00 18 25 0 0 14 27 14 26 " * * * * * 11 .19 09:00 12 17 0 0 4 17 6 17 " * * * * * 5 12 10:00. 3 9 0 0 4 9 5 14 * * * * " " 3 8 11:00 3 3 0 0 5 3 6 15 * * * * * * 3 5 Totals 408 494 231 242 319 380 391 481 106 83 0 0 0 0 333 391 ,fined 902 473 699 872 189 0 0 724 Split % 45.2 X364 45.6 54.4 44.8 55.2 56.1 43.9 0.0 .0 0.0 .0 46.0 54.0 AM Peak Hr 10:00 01:00 11:00 11:00 11:00 09:00 08:00 * * * * 11:00 11:00 Volume 29 31 34 30 38 30 * * * * 26 30 PM PeakHr 02:00 00 04:00 05:0 05:00 * * * * * * 12:00 05:00 Volume 39 4 42 3 59 * * * * * * 33 37 6 �P I HOL5 [koo �0 s 2-7 Uy �o g8 Data File: Halifax Avenue - 5240 Printed : 8/13/2007 Page : 2 Fage 1 of Jack Sullivan From: Gordon Hughes Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 10:48 AM To: Jack Sullivan Subject: FW: From: Roger Knutson [mailto:RKnutson @ck- law.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 3:01 PM To: Gordon Hughes Subject: 429.031 PRELIMINARY PLANS, HEARINGS. Subd.l(f) The hearing may be adjourned from time to time, and a resolution ordering the improvement may be adopted at any time within six months after the date of the hearing by vote of a majority of all members of the council when the improvement has been petitioned for by the owners of not less than 35 percent in frontage of the real property abutting on the streets named in the petition as the location of the improvement. When there has been no such petition, the resolution may be adopted only by vote of four -fifths of all members of the council; provided that if the mayor of the municipality is a member of the council but has no vote or votes only in case of a tie, the mayor is not deemed to be a member for the purpose of determining a four -fifths majority vote. 8/30/2007 Agenda Item II. B. RECEIVED SEP -4 2007 CITY OF EDINA Ms. Mangen: Please give each City Council member a copy of this letter BEFORE tonight's meeting. Thank you. To: Edina City Council - Proposed Halifax Sidewalk Meeting From: Sharon and Dave Maetzold: 5114 Halifax Ave. So. East Side? West Side? Down through history we've had the Hatfields and the McCoys, Army vs Navy, the Confederates against the Union. What now? It's the east side vs the west side of Halifax. Like death, taxes and cellulite... sidewalks are inevitable! We signed the petition requesting that the sidewalk not be put on the west side. If given the option, we'd rather not have sidewalks at all. It isn't the money. The assessment charge is quite reasonable, no matter which side it's on. (1) There is an existing sidewalk on the east side of the street by The Lanterns which saves the expense of building a connecting sidewalk on the west side. (2) Also, people, especially families with small children, would already be on the same side of the street to use the new pedestrian cross walk. (3) * *If the new sidewalk is on the west side, families would have to cross the Halifax traffic, either in the middle of the street at the Lanterns or walk directly in front of the Halifax vehicles trying to pull out into traffic. The entrance /exit to Halifax is already difficult for 2 cars to meet. It's pretty intense, especially at busy times. LOCATION of SIDEWALKS: (1) If the sidewalks are set back from the curb, even more trees and property will be lost. The houses on the west side of the 5100 block are closer to the street than the east side, so the 4V loss would be significant. The 5200 -5400 houses have much deeper lots. * * * * *(2) If the sidewalks are curbside, as they are along 501h most of the way up to Hwy. 100, it would be less destructive. NO SIDEWALKS: Winter maintenance will be a heavy burden for many people on either side. Edina does an incredible job of plowing the streets, and we're very grateful. However, just after the driveway is cleared ... the plow comes through and piles it back on. Dave, like Denny, has already had a double bypass. He also tore the biceps on BOTH arms from taking Lipitor for his heart. The melting snow on our inclined yard would produce a constant sheet of ice. Dave would not be able to just "let it go." Please do what you can. We know it's a dif f icult decision. Sincerely, Sharon and Dave Maetzold Cl `417® WGlN r or RivED//V / August 27, 2007 Ronald & Mona Pobiel 5109 Halifax Ave. S. Edina, MN 55424 Wayne D. Houle, P.E. Director of Public Works City Engineer, City of Edina 4801 West 50'' Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1394 Dear Mr. Houle: This letter is in regards to the proposed sidewalk on Halifax Avenue from 5 Vt to 54I' Streets. We oppose the project for the following reasons. We feel the project will negatively impact our property by making our driveway more difficult to access during the winter months. Our driveway is steep and already poses considerable traction difficulties during the winter, despite frequent snow removal and deicing. We are very concerned that even a small increase in the driveway grade will render our driveway even more hazardous. Secondly, we oppose the project on environmental grounds. We would like to see projects that entail increasing, rather than decreasing green space or coverage in Edina. With regards to the safety of pedestrians on Halifax, we favor efforts to reduce traffic speed (eg. speed bumps) and reduce traffic volume. Sincerely, Ronald and Mona Pobiel RECEIVED Monday, September 03, 2007P -42007 ENGINEERING DEFiG The Honorable James Hovland, Mayor Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland, CITI(OF EDIRP�6 I reside on Halifax Avenue in the section proposed for sidewalks. My husband and I have lived on this street since 1987 so we are familiar with the traffic issues. Our children were very small when the city did a detailed traffic study on how to improve traffic issues. Nothing really came out of it. My sons are now at EHS and we are still visiting this issue with the city. My husband and I are ready to pay for sidewalks (either side or both); we want to maintain the pedestrian environment in this area and we want it to remain safe for all people. I am concerned this issue is dividing us as neighbors and I want any change to not only be right for. our street but for the greater community. I look to the sidewalk project on Maple Road and see how it enhanced the neighborhood and made it easier to walk in the area. I believe that Halifax Avenue property owners should not be the sole financiers of this project. It benefits the entire community; our street carries a lot of traffic and is a favorite parking area during the annual Art Fair. There is talk that we need to modify the street design but I believe that is more costly and does not guarantee more safety to pedestrians. I do believe the council has a larger problem here — the traffic flow in and around the 50th and France area, as we are part of the perimeter. My husband walks to work (at Westgate Pet Clinic on 43`d and France) and he has had many close calls with vehicles in the 50th and France area (especially at the newest crosswalk behind Lunds, across 51 S` to Halifax). Please be proactive about this problem. It's only getting worse. Attached is a list of questions I have that I hope the council will address at this hearing. Your time and consideration are appreciated. Yours truly, M Port 5120 Halifax Ave. S. Edina, MN 55424 (952) 922 -4138 i - -.4j C1n 4 2#07 9VGINcOF EDINA Questions concerning Halifax Avenue Sidewalk project: • Are Halifax property owners the sole financier of this project or is the city paying a portion? If so, how much? • Who pays for the removal of trees — if necessary? • Our property has an irrigation system — how do you work with the property owner on this? • Is the quoted cost for sidewalk on ONE or both sides of the street? If only one, what is the cost for both sides? • People are concerned with the liability of having a city sidewalk in front of their house — please explain how this might affect the property owner. • What is the relationship of home values and sidewalks? • What is the interest rate if paid over 3 years? • What plan does the city have to address the traffic congestion in the 50`" ffi -France vicinity and the impact it has on pedestrians safely using the area? • What can the city do to improve the crosswalk to Halifax Ave across 51S`? August 29, 2007 Dear Linda: AUG 312007 CITY OF ED6 NA I am writing regarding the proposed sidewalk on Halifax. Please see that you colleagues get a copy of this letter. I am opposed for aesthetic reasons as well as safety. A sidewalk will only encourage cars to go faster. With walkers who tend to congregate at the end of their driveways, or people sauntering along 3 or 4 abreast with strollers and dogs, it will be a set -up for accidents with young children on skateboards and bicy &les. It will not prevent serious injury as recent incidents with pedestrians and restaranteurs shows (see enclosed articles). There are other measures to make it safe. Rules no one follows. 1. Walkers are supposed to walk toward oncoming traffic. 2. Bikers pedal on right and follow auto rules of road. 3. After sunset, use reflectors, lights, bright jackets. 4. Speed limit of 25 miles an hour with ped signs. 5. Bumps could be put in as they have on Dupont Av. S. 6. Heavy trucks (over 1 ton) could be kept off road. 7. Construction vehicles that clog road and sit all day could park on sidestreets or in the yard of house. I believe a petition was circulated and presented a year and a half ago or so where a strong majority did not want a sidewalk. That should be respected. I also think about $400,000 was spent to improve Edina parks a couple years ago. Why are they never used except by people across the street from them? Maybe Edina should build a skate park at Arden or Pamela or wherever as that seems to be the attractive nuisance of late. A sidewalk will not solve that problem as they like to whee down one driveway, cross the street, and go up the drive across the street. A boy (now 15 or so) near 52nd has been doing this for years jeopardi in himself in the traff'c. Wh c 't � � lk yo Arden? Maybeomeone can think creatively dry a �e iments. Sincerely, n 1,/ /�' I Jacqueline S. Mi. hun I 1s Y + Vicla ptruckj m� psc i ii jures 13 sidewalk diners i Omer evening at the Chcquot Club in south Minneapolis was thrown into chaos after a driverpass4d out and lost controL I ByJOYPOWEU and MMYLYNNSMITH Stu 7VIune staff writers When servers at Clicquot Club Cafe in south Minneapolis heard the screams ofeuskiiixers and the mar of the pickup truck plowing through sidewalk patio tables Friday right they rushed out the door AwbiteFordRangerpickupEck with an unconscious female driver had barreled into diners and the en- Ow was still racing. One man, a reg- " was pinned underneath it, rlear- lY h*Md i Employees 'twved the truck at least 6 feet till it was off him," said Map DAVIDIOIES - ctoles@sbuttwitcom Police officers and others looked over damage outside the Ckquot Club Cafe in south Minneapolis,' where a pickup truck ran into a crowd and injured 3,3. made ph2a, sandwK6% salads, cof were sweeping upciebris. feeandtea. "We know all of our Qsto" — Restaurant spokeswoman Amy they'whim,&WOlsonsaid. eke Fisher said the s driver was very concerned AKYUt dleM and= restaurant co-owner Aaron Olson. onabalolysummereveningwhenall a neighborhood res A. yQ L24& The truck was still roaring and the eight four-person outdoor tables at 6 L26&k 1, - .25 ruse DAVIDIOIES - ctoles@sbuttwitcom Police officers and others looked over damage outside the Ckquot Club Cafe in south Minneapolis,' where a pickup truck ran into a crowd and injured 3,3. made ph2a, sandwK6% salads, cof were sweeping upciebris. feeandtea. "We know all of our Qsto" — Restaurant spokeswoman Amy they'whim,&WOlsonsaid. eke Fisher said the s driver was very concerned AKYUt dleM and= restaurant co-owner Aaron Olson. onabalolysummereveningwhenall a neighborhood res dent who had gDtDthebospitalassoonaswe to The truck was still roaring and the eight four-person outdoor tables at phoned in an order md "suffered a see how everyone is doing:" three of her children last year txes still squealing. They pushed it the popular cafe were fiA restaurant medical conditioir before driving Workers gathered a bloodiedt, before jumping the curb and hit- fered a broken leg. The chil- employees said onto the sidewalk. ting the family eyeglasses, crayons and a chift Joshua hL Lindgren, 19, who Thirteen adults and children were I The c*, at2929F- 25thSt. opened Police told Fisher t ietruckwasgcp- headband 29, was pregnant and delivered treated at Hennepin County Medi- 'cal in2006inffir4E���_ ing about 30 miles hour when it two broken legs and other in- Center: and two were admitted, at lz� Located � hittliediners. juries. Thick wm�": Brother of club' least one in mitical condition, cery stoM it features a casual at- BylOpmpolicel adleffand em- chdha4beens&vez*ir 1 4 n- Ibeaccidenthappenedatn5pin, mosphere and specializes in home- ployees and neighba hood residents terstate 35Wbridge collapse. DS 0- Driver who struckwoman and three kids -in Burnsville gets jailtime An Apple valley man was electronic hoinenionitormi,; 5_.walked aloN aLpa*W" side- k0ta County Attorney James sentexiced, Monday for driving Dakota County District _Nmn, of June 22, Backstrom. Erickson, who into and injuring a woman and judge Will= Thuet also pit Vr Lindgren!z was pushing her_ two young- three of her children last year Lindgren on probation for five car swerve across ft-affic lanes er' children in a stroller, suf- as they walked along Burnsville years and ordered him to pay before jumping the curb and hit- fered a broken leg. The chil- pa&way. . his victims' medical costs and ting the family dren in the stroller, ages 1 and Joshua hL Lindgren, 19, who to follow chemical- dependency \ The mother: Stacy Erickson, 3, had scrapes and bruises. Her had pleaded to four counts of treatment recommendations. 29, was pregnant and delivered 4year-old daughter sustained criminal vehicular operation, Tests showed he had morphine her child without problems, two broken legs and other in- wassentencedtofourmonthsm and cocaine in his system when and her three injured chit- juries. jail andmorethanfive m cif dreg have recovered, said Da- JIMADAMS _ µ Ell - � k } • Y14� .. � �� ""rt+� ,y • ti F �' r i ice. -,r.:. .g •f \� t7"1 011@P, r f."'a'L (N. 0 Agenda Item II. B. We, the undersigned petition the city not to colistruct sidewalks along the west side Halifax Ave between 500' and 54th AM!OjW CITY OF EDINA Pj! dMG ENGINEEMNG DEn Print Name Address Signature Date Phone 13 140 7 qS-j-- M @-I Ba/07 , say '9107 �5z ?RR � /V 14 #4 le L C--,S t S 0S DL 0Z, r VV IV .5 Lr� �� � ��z�"`� % Sir -s�.Fzo 30o L?-7- 4 c15 2— ? Z0 Ifl(ft IWICI +bWr= "'� We, the undersigned petition the city not to construct sidewalks along the west side of Halifax Ave between 50`h and 54th Print Name Address Si ature Date Phone 5 1 1 4 ,.. s aoy 14&VFAJ4-A..V. - l oa-1 s f, KUTIVED Agenda Item II.B. AN 31 XV CITY OF EDINA run... - -- Mr. Wayne Houle City of Edina 801 West 50'' St Edina, MN 55424 RE: East side of Halifax between 51" and 54`h Street Dear Mr. Houle: We, the residents of the east side of Halifax Ave. hereby submit his petition to the City of Edina to let you know of our wishes regarding the petition submitted in December 2004 to the Edina City Council that requested sidewalks along Halifax Ave. between 51St and 54th Streets. This is the second petition that we hav0 subs 1490 ripgg4jpU 14is issue. The previous petition was signed by residents and submitted in January of 2005. Sincerely, Your neighbors on Halifax Avenue R��F� Z 31 Petition ENGN N���N4 August 25, 2007 We, the undersigned, petition the City of Edina NOT to construct sidewalks along the east side of Halifax Avenue between 51 'c Street and 54th Street. MI' 01 �MMM-Inature Phone Date i F®r 0 N / ,, 1"ON) / • *. / , • :emu / � :1. /J /�// /r /. • — a r Petition August 25, 2007 We, the undersigned, petition the City of Edina NOT to construct sidewalks along the east side of Halifax Avenue between 51" Street and 54 h Street. �1 Zoe ci�31 obi WG /N6°Ffo/NA Date 0?- -7 z-7 9 FIe-kc.e-rZ- 57 (37 14a 1:4,-x 9s .2-g .2 .2 -Sss't 9 -28.07 Petition August 25, 2007 We, the undersigned, petition the City of Edina NOT to construct sidewalks along the east side of Halifax Avenue between 51 st Street and 54th Street. �RE�EIV C�4*31 ?1107 5yg /Nf�FEDlNA Print Name Address Signature Phone Date 1 U ► Vii31Ni: �sl�: ���f• 7�• 7. �1f. 7�rlrt l; r9�1�) s�. r.! 7�r3�.���:7ry►.�i3��:.�cr•.�ilG� :jT'I' -�i �J►� 1 n �.. a v►� �1' a y o 1- 5 0 �tl Y L! 7 PI /T ,c :k a44-.1 44-.. 1 Y W d � � . r sz - 9 L Z- y/ ?i b-4-07 .sz.-'?j Hall �alk 3t ,e �'►1 ��- e �1?� �r 515 - VA2 - 991k 0 7 V09 4 1141( Ae kl& I VA,&,; 6 /a - 2 30 -�ooi ' -off Petition August 25, 2007 We, the undersigned, petition the City of Edina NOT to construct sidewalks along the east side of Halifax Avenue between 51" Street and 54th Street. 'Tt('EIVED 43itV CITY OF mr,,,...._- ED1NA Print Nye Address -Signature Phone Date 0) Yol- � f� j o �! � 3 3 7 � I � l �' ��'x ✓ . �. �L �(3e� l � n �3 d Petition August 25, 2007 We, the undersigned, petition the City of Edina NOT to construct sidewalks along the east side of Halifax Avenue between 51 s' Street and 54 h Street. RECEIVED AN31XW CITY OF EOINq Print Name Address Signature Phone Date 1.�. �b)E�� Daq�vwEry 53os t�-i Fra-x I'�t)�• l�1- • � �.• ���� 4 � ?- ��t(o � O $ 3o ad07 1111ol QUESTION / COMMENT CARD \fY,� V\,�-- L, r- cs -�nX17 ` ° -it -Sp g_ S MA_s_ Vy*j CZ' -l"ftA4 (-v._ 144. 6-'Y O-Ar'• " I^ 1 1\ .. w 1 i w -- - - .. _ Y w _ 1 T liuu w ..A • C b....� . y ........0i1 /..n rr � 1 &AA/\, =&4&LL= Ykk -R-d S C� \ Name "Ire- r es Ar �'o r I T 1 Address 53316 i'}� I i � x A V• S. PLEASE PRINT PLEASE PRINT U S 41 Agenda Item II.B. August 27, 2007 Mr. Wayne Houle City of Edina 4801 West 50'h Street Edina, MN. 55424 Dear Mr. Houle: 01)?4EIVE' *V3 I �j C'r EDINq I am writing as a concerned resident of Halifax Avenue. I have lived at 5325 Halifax Avenue since 1978. My concerns are related to the sidewalk project proposed for 2008. I am unable to attend the meetings that have been scheduled at city hall to discuss this project due to my work schedule but appreciate this opportunity to share my views in writing. My questions and concerns are as follows: After reading the letters I have received from city hall and after reading the article in the Star Tribune newspaper, I am assuming the decision has been made that the sidewalk will be put in on Halifax Avenue. However, in 2004 a petition was circulated showing that the majority of home owners were opposed. I am wondering what has changed. Has the city conducted its own assessment and found there now is support for this? As according to the last letter I received from city hall, the sidewalk is proposed for the east side of the street only, what is the rationale for the east side versus the west side? If the decision is based on the support of the majority, is this support coming mainly from the home owners who live on the east side of the street? What consideration is being given to existing landscaping? I have 2 neighbors whose front lawns slope to the curb. Putting a sidewalk on the east side would create considerable disruption to their landscaping. As there are no sloping front lawns on the west side, has this been taken in to consideration? If safety is a major reason for the sidewalk has any consideration been given to other methods of improving safety such as narrowing the street or blocking the entrance to Halifax at 51" street? If the street remains at its present width is it not probable that with a sidewalk more drivers will use the street and speeds will increase? What consideration is being given to the trees? According to the newspaper article, the city has control of the property that extends beyond the boulevard trees and includes the area that would be required for the sidewalk so it can be put in without the consent of the homeowners. But what about the trees that are close enough to be possibly damaged by the construction process? Now that we have lost so many elms, are we going to have to lose more trees? I think it is ironic that when the boulevard elm in front of my home needed to be removed because it was a hazard to the street, I was informed it belonged to ti me and was my responsibility to have it removed. Now that the city wants to put in a sidewalk the same area is city property. I raised a child on Halifax Avenue. I am an advocate for progress and an advocate for safety especially for our children. In spite of my concerns and questions about the process I would not oppose this project if I knew my neighborhood was in the majority supporting it and if the support was sufficiently weighted on the side of the street where it is planned. I would also support it if I knew that the city was actively exploring all ways to improve the safety on this heavily traveled street. If at this time the sidewalk proposal is still met with legitimate opposition, I hope that once again the city will reconsider its decision. Sincerely, O I� Kathy O'Dea t 'genda Item II. B. August 29, 2007 Dear Linda: 3ifi ,PED1/yA I am writing regarding the proposed sidewalk on Halifax. Please see that yoUr colleagues get a' copy of this letter. I am opposed for aesthetic reasons as well as safety. A sidewalk will only encourage cars to go faster. With walkers who tend to congregate at the end of their driveways, or people sauntering along 3 or 4 abreast with strollers and dogs, it will be a set -up for accidents with young children on skateboards and bicycles. It will not prevent serious injury as recent incidents with pedestrians and resiaranteurs shows (see enclosed articles). There are other measures to make it safe. Rules no one follows. 1. Walkers are supposed to walk toward oncoming Jrraffic. 2. Bikers pedal on right and follow auto rules of road. 3. After sunset, use reflectors, lights, bright jackets. 4. Speed limit of 25 miles an hour with ped signs. 5. Bumps could be put in as they have on Dupont Av. S. 6. Heavy trucks (over 1 ton) could be kept off road. 7• Construction vehicles that clog road and sit all day could park on sidestreets or in the yard of house. I believe a petition was circulated and presented a year and a half ago or so where a strong majority did not want a sidewalk. That should be respected. I also think about $400,000 was spent to improve .Edina parks a couple years ago. Why are they never used except by people across the street from them? Maybe Edina should build a skate park at Arden or Pamela or wherever as that seems to be the attractive nuisance of late. A sidewalk will not solve that problem as they like to whee down one driveway, cross the street, and go up the drive across the street. A boy (now 15 or so) near 52nd has been doing this for years jeopardi in himself in the traff'c. Wh c It lk to Arden? Maybe omeone can think creatively 9r �y A$ei�iments. Sincerely, Jacqueline S. Mithun 41� ..let 4c, AO AAAL� .1 A-"vkL Al 'Oki ANA C/ Y SFq� � YFCF /v�JD� Fp \�i sIDW ALKQ(--cl",'7 HALIFAW GrAh+ A ro- 4 9- Ir I G () 4 y f-If Ily U2 GrAh+ A ro- 4 9- Ir I G () 4 y f-If Ily Halifax Ave. Sidewalk Survey 51s' St. — 54thSt. Sept. 4, 2007 House Wants If Yes, one side or both Does not want Resident's Initials and # sidewalk sides? sidewalk Date 5101 5105 chi 5109 5115 5117 5121 5125 5129 5133 j 5137 V G \TY C o� gEA S�EGENEp gY I J %j i 5000 5100 Blocks West Halifax Ave. Sidewalk Survey 51St St. — 54thSt. Sept. 4, 2007 House Wants If Yes, one side or both Does not want. Resident's Initials and # sidewalk sides? sidewalk Date 5028 5032 5036 ` -O„ lr 0 � N, VVI A 5104 5108 5114 5116 5120 �/ ✓U'' �a1 l �Gj�. 5124 Y Oo 11 5128 V, W° jcj 5E �e f i C lm- 7t6D 56 29 i`(J�y e+ p. ,.6✓ d �� Halifax Ave. Sidewalk Survey 51St St. — 54thSt. Sept. 4, 2007 House Wants If Yes, one side or both Does not want Resident's Initials and # sidewalk sides? sidewalk Date 5201 �� O� =C o � 5205 � 7? ' A- T n 5209 5213 /Y � l 5217 G� o� 5221 WDOL6 VOTE IEs Passisay ,f GTy ("AYAIM \ _- 5225 5229 D 5237 Pump House 5241 9131(0-7 SO COO ��J�° 1 5200 Block West Halifax Ave. Sidewalk Survey 51St St. — 54thSt. Sept. 4, 2007 House Wants If Yes, one side or, both Does not want Resident's Initials and # sidewalk sides? sidewalk of Date 5200 5204 520 - I rr.,, 3 5212 5216 5220 �U 5224 5228 JMC.G 5232 5236 30rH 5240 �cLE LU q.M` 5300 Block East Halifax Ave. Sidewalk Survey 51St St. — 54thSt. Sept. 4, 2007 House Wants If Yes, one side or both Does not want Resident's Initials and # sidewalk sides ?, : `sidewalk Date 5301 5305 5309 5313 V� 5317 sOC. /�J/ 5321 Jim 5325 5329 I Vl0 "S6 ab" oZ 5333 5337 5300 Block West Halifax Ave. Sidewalk Survey 51St St. — 54thSt. Sept. 4, 2007 House Wants If Yes, one side or both Does not want Resident's Initials and # sidewalk sides? sidewalk Date 5300 D k7 5304 5308 5312 5316 Tom, bn- q�3 /o 7 7 �e1 5320 43107 l` 5324 X Both sides Anne Bishop an o n 67st 9/2/2007 5328 � �� �-�-. e. c- v c^ 2 ; �-•; \..L� 5332 5336 P� Fm 14 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # III. A. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE Consent ❑ City Engineer Information Only ❑ Date: September 4, 2007 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Vacation of Existing Public Action ❑ Motion Right -of -Way, West 41 st Resolution Street between Monterey ❑ Ordinance Avenue and Lynn Avenue ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Vacate the existing right -of -way of West 41St Street between Monterey Avenue and Lynn Avenue and retain all utility rights / easements. Info /Background: The owner of the property located at 4100 Lynn Avenue requests the proposed vacation of the existing right -of -way, West 41St Street from Monterey Avenue to Lynn Avenue, see attached sketch. Staff mailed letters to the adjacent property owners asking them if they agree with the vacation. We received confirmation of support from the property owner of 4021 Monterey Avenue and non - support from the property owner of 4022 Lynn Avenue. We have not received any correspondence from the property owner of 4101 Monterey Avenue. Centerpoint Energy does not object to this vacation. Comcast requests that the vacation be subject to retaining all utility rights or easements. The City of Edina Utilities does have utilities in this area and request that the vacation be subject to retaining all utility rights or easements. Xcel Energy and Qwest have not yet responded to this request. Staff feels that there is not a future need for this right -of -way and recommends the vacation of the entire right -of -way be approved on condition of retaining all existing utility easements on the property. G:\Engineering \General \40 - 49 Streets \W 41st Street Vacation\RR - West 41st Street ROW Vacation.doc V Recommendation: Set the Hearing Date for the September 18, 2007 City Council meeting to consider a comprehensive guide plan amendment from multiple family residential to office; a re- zoning from R -2, double - dwelling district to POD -1, office and a final development plan at 6444 and 6446 Xerxes Avenue. Info/Background: The applicant is proposing to remodel the existing duplex from a medical office and residential use to a medical office. The south half of the duplex currently is a chiropractic office, and the north half is rented out as a residential unit. The applicant is proposing to remodel the interior of the duplex to turn it entirely into a medical office for Dr. Paula Schwartz, who is an audiologist. There would be no exterior changes to the existing structure. (See the attached narrative and plans.) REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item IV. A. Consent From: Cary Teague Planning Director Information Only F] Date: September 4, 2007 Mgr. Recommends 1-1 To HRA ® To Council Subject: Set hearing date for a guide plan amendment, rezoning Action ® Motion and final development plan for 6444 and 6446 Xerxes Resolution Avenue. Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: Set the Hearing Date for the September 18, 2007 City Council meeting to consider a comprehensive guide plan amendment from multiple family residential to office; a re- zoning from R -2, double - dwelling district to POD -1, office and a final development plan at 6444 and 6446 Xerxes Avenue. Info/Background: The applicant is proposing to remodel the existing duplex from a medical office and residential use to a medical office. The south half of the duplex currently is a chiropractic office, and the north half is rented out as a residential unit. The applicant is proposing to remodel the interior of the duplex to turn it entirely into a medical office for Dr. Paula Schwartz, who is an audiologist. There would be no exterior changes to the existing structure. (See the attached narrative and plans.) _ _.�-- +►�" .. . — . x �, , � . sxi�_ , � , w. ,. .. , - ,- • - � ] , 1 }♦ 4F !, �:s .r .- �.f r � ��y ��� � i �.ti yr' 1��. �� i�K, -� - r A ��' -k'a t��,,yan, �,.t�'1 � �i 4 � � t .. � � � � i r� �' i ra �, 3� Mt "Y _ 7Nt��^'��� ;ei�' N, 5��1F #`i .rii sue; a 1 t. ,, ..� ... ,- � ,. i n � :. x'4'4.415., � �a� 9tF _,p� -i. � 4 � ,. W^ r r ' •_..c .., .,. � _,.. .. '. ' .' .,• - �� y yy� 'Rti'M'y ?� '_�-�.` 1x1 �,. c ".�' � ti�'t :p ," `.i .. ; s ^^�� t ij 1i�� is s..- � r . �. ._. ., .. .... , . .. = S•. .,... ... , k� CCC Costa Chiropractic Center Dr. Joseph C. Costa Oft i CIIN T ueRRATIvE 6446 Xerxes Avenue South Edina, Minnesota 55423 -1039 (952) 922 -1175 Fax (952) 922 -9539 July 2, 2007 Planning Conunission Members City of Edina 4801 50'' Street West Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Dear Planning Commission Members, We are requesting a zero line property rezoning of our duplex, locate X46 Xerxes Avenue South to a Planned Office District 1 zoning. The current Hennepin County 2007 property tax statement classifies the property as residential (6444) and commercial preferred (6446). My wife and I have operated a chiropractic office since 1987 in the 6446 side of the building. The site has been a chiropractic office since 1975. We have a purchase agreement for the property, which is contingent upon a successful rezoning for the entire structure to Planned Office District 1. Dr. Paula.and Tom Schwartz are the prospective buyers. Dr. Schwartz is an audiologist. Dr. Schwartz's desire and 'intent for the future use of this structure is to open both sides as one office, which is consistent with the current and 32 year historical use of this property as a health care office. The requested rezoning change is also consistent with your Edina 2020 planned land use to "grow medical offices in the north Southdale region." Dr. Schwartz intends to remodel and upgrade the interior, while maintaining the structure's exterior style as is. The existing parking lot will provide ample parking for the rezoning requirements. The requested change involves only a zero line property rezoning, while maintaining the current structure, and not disturbing the surrounding environment or the neighborhood style. Dr. Schwartz's professional use of this site will be a great and convenient asset to the citizens of Edina. The rezoning request represents a logical and non - invasive zoning change benefiting both the citizens and the city of Edina. Therefore, we respectfully request your support and your affirmative recommendation of this rezoning request to the city council. Thank you in advance for your time and consideration in reviewing our request. Respectfully, Jane and Joseph Costa L 2 2007. We are requesting a zero line property rezoning of our duplex, locate X46 Xerxes Avenue South to a Planned Office District 1 zoning. The current Hennepin County 2007 property tax statement classifies the property as residential (6444) and commercial preferred (6446). My wife and I have operated a chiropractic office since 1987 in the 6446 side of the building. The site has been a chiropractic office since 1975. We have a purchase agreement for the property, which is contingent upon a successful rezoning for the entire structure to Planned Office District 1. Dr. Paula.and Tom Schwartz are the prospective buyers. Dr. Schwartz is an audiologist. Dr. Schwartz's desire and 'intent for the future use of this structure is to open both sides as one office, which is consistent with the current and 32 year historical use of this property as a health care office. The requested rezoning change is also consistent with your Edina 2020 planned land use to "grow medical offices in the north Southdale region." Dr. Schwartz intends to remodel and upgrade the interior, while maintaining the structure's exterior style as is. The existing parking lot will provide ample parking for the rezoning requirements. The requested change involves only a zero line property rezoning, while maintaining the current structure, and not disturbing the surrounding environment or the neighborhood style. Dr. Schwartz's professional use of this site will be a great and convenient asset to the citizens of Edina. The rezoning request represents a logical and non - invasive zoning change benefiting both the citizens and the city of Edina. Therefore, we respectfully request your support and your affirmative recommendation of this rezoning request to the city council. Thank you in advance for your time and consideration in reviewing our request. Respectfully, Jane and Joseph Costa I4P1'titANT PAR Al I V C t dilogy ncepts Innovative Hearing Solutions for Everyday Living Dr. Paula Schwartz is a licensed Doctor of Audiology by the state of Minnesota with over 20 years experience in serving the hearing needs of the greater Minneapolis area, here in Edina. Her diverse background as a manager for a major manufacturer and clinical audiologist in private practice give her a well rounded understanding of the needs of the hearing impaired. Dr. Schwartz specializes in the latest technological advancements in hearing assessment, tinnitus and rehabilitation and is committed to helping people hear by educating them on available solutions to their hearing and tinnitus needs. In 2002 Audiology Concepts opened its doors at 7450 France Ave. South in Edina. Based on a professional medical model, Dr. Schwartz has grown her practice through referral relationships with primary care physicians throughout the Twin Cities. With a keen interest in tinnitus, The Tinnitus and Hyperacusis Clinic was added to Audiology Concepts in 2005. Currently the only Tinnitus Clinic in the state of Minnesota, Dr. Schwartz sees patients from a three state area including Canada for tinnitus treatment. Audiology Concepts operates with a staff of three and sees patients from 7:00 am until 4:30 pm daily. Appointments range from new hearing evaluations, hearing device fittings, tinnitus assessments and treatment to hearing device servicing. The vision of expansion to 6444 Xerxes is to have the physical space and location necessary to create the Audiology practice of the future. Audiology Concepts will be unprecedented as a state of the art facility in technology, products and services. "As a small business owner, I'm excited about the possibility of owning a free standing office in the South dale medical/professional/retail area. This opportunity will benefit the patients of Audiology Concepts and the residents of Edina". Paula Schwartz, Au.D Doctor of Audiology 7450 France Ave. South cm Suite 280 - Edina, MN 55435 17705 Hutchins Drive - Suite 105 - Minnetonka, MN 55345 952 - 831 -4222- Fax: 952 - 831 -4942- www.audiologyconcepts.com X T 20 10 0 20 40 d Em MMM 6CAL6 N FEET o VJc ?s e� LEGEND OL,_ FOLDW Found Propmty Mmument -/v V I a .Rom (Ulm. Reg. No. 2367 Cmmet. Cmcete Lurb — —~— Goa Fence 1 Owhoad E3eetrle - - - -m F]MRNC 11U611aiG r Parking Seib.rk Lin. O Electric Meter D Electrle Boa O EW tri. Manhole O Unknown Manhole ¢ H RQR Pwer pegs U Guy W" Mahar 0 Gate Vdw 0 Cat hbosin B Cotehbo.ii ® Air Cmditl.ning Unit Dedtlu.us Tre. (Diameter in Cmlfereua Tree (Oi.meler in Light Pd. 0 Gm M.t.r m Tdephme Box B Smltary LI-Me 0 X T 20 10 0 20 40 d Em MMM 6CAL6 N FEET o VJc ?s e� LEGEND OL,_ FOLDW Found Propmty Mmument =T Set Property Mmummt .Rom (Ulm. Reg. No. 2367 Cmmet. Cmcete Lurb — —~— Goa Fence Owhoad E3eetrle - - - -m Setback Lin. -- — s Parking Seib.rk Lin. O Electric Meter D Electrle Boa O EW tri. Manhole O Unknown Manhole ¢ H !a Pwer pegs U Guy W" Mahar 0 Gate Vdw 0 Cat hbosin B Cotehbo.ii ® Air Cmditl.ning Unit Dedtlu.us Tre. (Diameter in Cmlfereua Tree (Oi.meler in Light Pd. 0 Gm M.t.r m Tdephme Box B Smltary LI-Me 0 St.rm Mmrhde X 651.27G E.Iating Spot Elw.tim Gutter . X 534.3 6d tbg Spot Elewtim 6 Proposed Hmdi..p Parking P.E.W Prop—d Edge of Bit.minous LLW EkWUg Edge of Bltumtn.u. % �c IJ cW i'6ZC E uo nw amram rae� s Silt* PLAN ell- YI-I D- re Ot lot R"f r /3- c/o . I . 'rP-EAnftWr rf --" -epr ® j ku I 4 -10 13 , t S--1 JUL 2 6 2007 WO I0 -0 cu 0 w a H W c5� F: -B N J C 26- _ ►E F: -B N 0 A O m a N 005 V -o JUG P 7007 EY.z' -rs`J c< •t Pr woL-I�- a45.6-,14 eA, I- 4 C Q TO: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE FROM: .Wayne Houle PE, City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: September 4, 2007 AGENDA ITEM VI. A. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Contract No. ENG 07 -11 West 70th Street (France to York) Landscaping Project Improvement No. A -236 Company 2. Arteka Companies LLC 3. Hoffman McNamara Co RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Arteka Companies LLC Amount of Quote or Bid $ 94,722 $ 95,954.01 $ 124,328.50 $ 95,954.01 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for the landscaping of the West 70th Street Reconstruction from France Avenue to York Avenue. This area will be planted next spring and the vegetation for the project will be chosen this fall from the nurseries. All City projects must follow State Statute, which does not allow any contractor or affiliation with any contractor that is currently debarred by the State of Minnesota. Minnesota Valley Landscaping is currently debarred by the State of Minnesota. Staff and legal counsel feel that based on submitted documents by Minnesota Valley Wholesale that they are affiliated with Minnesota Valley Landscaping. Staff is therefore recommending that Minnesota Valley Wholesale's bid be rejected. This project is part of the West 70th Street project and will be funded through the special assessments for this project. The Engineers estimate for this project is $114,442.00. Staff has verified Arteka's past performance and are recommendinq awardinq this bid to Arteka Companies LLC. Public Works - Engineering Signdture — Wayne Houle The Recommended Bid is within'blodget not withinbet Ma Gor on Hughes, Citf M aI G: \Engineering \Contract Numbers\2007\ENG 07 -11 W. 70th (France to York) Landscaping ProjecRADMIN\MIS020070904 ENG 07 -11 RFP.doc nce Director TO: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE FROM: Wayne Houle PE, City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15.000 DATE: September 4, 2007 AGENDA ITEM VI. B. ITEM DESCRIPTION: 50'r& France Emergency Concrete Paver Repair Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Carlson — LaVine Inc. $ 23,612.28 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Carlson - LaVine Inc. $ 23,612.28 GENERAL INFORMATION: This repair is for the additional concrete pavers that were used during the restoration of the common walkway between the Middle Parking Ramp and Edina Properties (Spalon Montage and Tejas area), which was caused by a power outage last March. Due to the poor condition of the pavers, staff decided to replace all of the pavers from the ramp to the buildings with the trench restoration. The adjacent properties did share in the overall cost of the project, which was $53,308.87. No other quotes were obtained, due to timing of restoring everything as soon as possible. This cost will be included in the 2007 Special Maintenance Assessments for the 501h and France Area. Public Works - Engineering Sig ature —Wayne Houle De artment R The Recommended Bid is within budget not within k)pdgetA A0,*WaII)1KYinance Director Hughes, G: \Engineering \Infrastructure \HRH's \50th & France \March 2007 Power Outage\20070904 50th n France Concrete Paver Repair RFP.doc o e v .�y REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: FROM: VIA: SUBJECT: DATE: Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation Gordon Hughes, City Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 September 4, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: VI. C. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Evaporative Condenser Emergency Repair — Braemar West Arena _ Compan y Amount of Quote or Bid 1. New Mech Companies, Inc. 1. $39,378.00 plus sales tax 2. Cool Air Mechanical, Inc. 2. $47,474.00 plus sales tax 3. Gartner Refrigeration & MFG., Inc. 3. $55,540.00 plus sales tax 4. Rink -Tec International, Inc. 4. $62,000.00 plus sales tax RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Account #: 5524.6180 New Mech Companies, Inc. $39,378.00 plus sales tax GENERAL INFORMATION: This is an emergency repair purchase and installation of replacement evaporative condenser Model #VC2 -N191 in accordance with specifications for Braemar West Arena. Purchase price includes BaltiBOND coating on the condenser; and also includes removal and disposal of old evaporative condenser. Installation shall be complete within 5 days or less of receiving the new condenser on site from the manufacturer, which shall be less than 12 weeks. Specifications also call for the installation process to last no longer than 8 to 12 hours, which avoids loss of ice. This is a very large piece of equipment critical to the Braemar West Arena's ammonia based refrigeration system. This evaporative condenser weighs over 8,700 pounds and is designed to remove the heat from the ammonia -based refrigeration system. The existing evaporative condenser is over 15 years old and just recently developed a serious leak due to its age and erosion. The failure has been repaired; however, our professional equipment energy consultant, Honeywell, strongly recommends that the entire unit be immediately replaced. If this piece of equipment fails beyond repair, the West Arena will not have ice until a replacement unit can be installed, which could result in 12 weeks of business interruption. Therefore, staff secured four written quotes from four reputable vendors to supply and install this critical piece of equipment. The typical advertised closed -bid process had to be foregone in order to avoid the risk of significant business interruption. A written purchase order was submitted for approval by the City Manager on August 22, 2007. . NE 15 This Recommended bid is within budget -2- not wit] Edina Park and Recreation Department CI ��NA �1 o e Cn To: Mayor & City Council From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: September 4, 2007 Subject: Resolution Receiving Donations Recommendation: Adopt Resolution. REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item VILA. Consent ❑ Information Only Mgr. Recommends 1-1 To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution Ordinance ❑ Discussion Info/Background: ` In order to comply with State Statutes all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. 4 RESOLUTION NO. 2007-92 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Donation to the Braemar Memorial Fund for future Golf Course equipment purchases: Paul Mott $100.00 Donations to the Edina Art Center: Penny Galinson $20.00 Inna K. Hays $10.00 Alison Bray $130.00 Sandra O. Fishman $10.00 Dated: September 4, 2007 0 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of September 4, 2007 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 20_. City Clerk R55CKREL G20000 CITY INA E A 8:06:27 Council Check Register Page- 1 8/23/2007 --8/23/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 300571 812312007 101833 A.T.O.M. 500.00 TRAINING REGISTRATION 00003010 167774 8508387 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 500.00 300572 8/23/2007 102403 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT 138.45 DIRT 00001417 167775 30632 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 410.02 DIRT, SOD 00001417 167776 29139 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 253.47 DIRT, SOD 00001417 167777 29106 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 41.95 DIRT 00001418 167830 29143 1643.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT GENERAL TURF CARE 41.95 DIRT 00001418 167831 29101 1643.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT GENERAL TURF CARE 885.84 300573 8/23/2007 100715 ACCLAIM BENEFITS 622.70 FLEX SPENDING ACCT ADMIN 167947 001857 1551.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CITY HALL GENERAL 205.50 COBRA ADMIN 167948 002059 1551.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CITY HALL GENERAL 828.20 300574 812312007 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 58.60 167868 609394 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 146.25 167869 609380 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 81.08 167870 609392 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 56.60 167906 609324 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 36.04 167907 701415 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 58.60 167908 609398 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 125.16 167909 609381 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 74.20 167910 485971 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 636.53 300575 8/23/2007 102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES 1,455.96 READY MIX 00005902 167778 4197427 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 1,611.96 READY MIX 00005902 167779 4196612 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 2,079.96 READY MIX 00005902 167780 4196833 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 365.17 READY MIX 00005902 167832 4197046 1646.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK BUILDING MAINTENANCE 961.97 READY MIX 00005902 167949 4197240 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 964.09 READY MIX 00005917 167950 4197628 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 2,157.94 READY MIX 00005902 168111 4198013 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 2,079.96 READY MIX 00005902 168112 4198308 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 1,819.96 READY MIX 00005902 168113 4198484 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 13,496.97 300576 8/2312007 120904 ALCORN BEVERAGE CO INC. 262.00 167871 504850 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA 8/22/2007 8:06:27 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 2 8/23/2007 -- 8/23/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 262.00 300577 8/2312007 120168 ALLIANCE ELECTRIC INC. 2,169.35 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 168016 4561 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 2,169.35 300578 812312007 100017 AMERICAN LOCKER SECURITY SYSTE 159.86 LOCKER PARTS 00002151 168017 461947 .5620.6530 REPAIR PARTS EDINBOROUGH PARK 159.86 300579 812312007 101479 AMERICAN SERVICE CORP. 168.19 BOILER MAINTENANCE 167904 6985 5821.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 191.19 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 168114 6986 5841.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE YORK OCCUPANCY 359.38 300580 812312007 121207 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF APPRAISERS 225.00 APPLICATION FEE 167833 081407 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 225.00 300581 8/23/2007 100627 AMERICAN TEST CENTER INC. 1,235.00 LADDER TESTING 168018 2072481 -IN 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,235.00 300582 812312007 105086 AMERICAN WATERWORKS ASSOCIATI 158.00 DUES - JERRY HERSHEY 168115 2000578733 5919.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS TRAINING 158.00 300583 8123/2007 102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 150.08 BASE RADIO REPAIR 168019 74591 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 150.08 300584 8123/2007 100631 ANDERSON, TODD 159.96 LACROSSE REBOUNDER 168020 081707 5210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 159.96 300585 812312007 102470 AON RISK SERVICES INC. OF MN 5,957.00 PREMIUM 167951 6100000094164 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5,957.00 300586 8/23/2007 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 968.03 FOOD 168021 805255 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 968.03 L J7 8:06:27 Page - 3 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GOLF ADMINISTRATION 628.70 MERCHANDISE 168023 931827 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 167872 628.70 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREk G20000 167873 300590 CITY INA 101954 AUGIE'S INC. 261.20 167874 41722500 Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 78.32 FOOD 8/23/2007 -8/23/2007 5430.5510 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 300587 8123/2007 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 8/2312007 103708 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO. 121.28 COFFEE 167952 406415 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 287.50 121.28 167968 19372S 5911.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 300588 812312007 119645 ARCSTONE INFORMATION SERVICES 30.00 EBROCHURE AD 00006148 168022 11768 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 30.00 300589 812312007 FRONT ALIGNMENT 00005303 102134 ASHWORTH INC. 47799 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS L J7 8:06:27 Page - 3 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GOLF ADMINISTRATION 628.70 MERCHANDISE 168023 931827 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PATHS & HARD SURFACE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PLAYGROUND & THEATER 390.04 167872 628.70 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 980.70 167873 300590 8123/2007 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 101954 AUGIE'S INC. 261.20 167874 41722500 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 78.32 FOOD 168024 24147 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 78.32 300591 8/2312007 103708 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO. 287.50 WELL #11 REPAIRS 00005328 167968 19372S 5911.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 287.50 300592 8/23/2007 100637 AUTOMOBILE SERVICE CO. 65.79 FRONT ALIGNMENT 00005303 167781 47799 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 65.79 300593 812312007 100642 BANNERS TO GO 15.98 PARK SIGN 00005259 167834 24727 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 15.98 300594 812312007 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 909.42 BATTERIES 00003865 168116 18- 183243 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 909.42 300595 812312007 120517 BEITEL, DAWN 118.82 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 167835 081407 1624.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 118.82 300596 8/2312007 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION RICHARDS GOLF COURSE PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PATHS & HARD SURFACE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PLAYGROUND & THEATER 390.04 167872 41580800 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 980.70 167873 41731100 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 261.20 167874 41722500 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 161.13 167875 43254000 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/23/2007 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 8/23/2007 -- 8/23/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 139.28 167876 43328400 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 322.50 167877 41731200 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 79.56 167878 43328500 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 219.66 167911 43313800 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 181.54 167912 43345400 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 123.95 167913 5559000 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1400.6513 1600.6406 5440.5511 5440.5511 1195.6103 1470.4329 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5410.6122 5822.5514 5822.5515 OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/22/2007 8:06:27 Page - 4 Business Unit YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS- PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP ADVERTISING OTHER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 2,859.56 300597 8/23/2007 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 71.97 OFFICE SUPPLIES 167782 W0462253-1 6.70 OFFICE SUPPLIES 167969 WO- 464341 -1 78.67 300598 8123/2007 101691 BETZEN GOLF SUPPLY CO. 34.40 MERCHANDISE 168025 22493 404.89 MERCHANDISE 168026 22485 439.29 300599 8/2312007 119631 BONNER & BORHART LLP 14,993.75 PROSECUTING 168027 32894 14,993.75 300600 8123/2007 121432 BRECKE, MARION 1,186.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 167953 081507 1,186.00 300601 8123/2007 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 168.55 . GOLF CLUB 168151 912836384 95.90 GOLF CLUB 168152 913037030 162.96 MERCHANDISE 168153 913037025 83.48 GOLF CLUB 168154 913037026 236.20 GOLF CLUBS 168155 913310514 589.98 GOLF CLUBS 168156 913346381 1,337.07 300602 8123/2007 108688 CANTON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 594.00 ADVERTISING 167980 070806 -1 594.00 300603 8/2312007 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 436.45 167879 68210 14.35 167880 68211 1400.6513 1600.6406 5440.5511 5440.5511 1195.6103 1470.4329 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5440.5511 5410.6122 5822.5514 5822.5515 OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/22/2007 8:06:27 Page - 4 Business Unit YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS- PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP ADVERTISING OTHER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREC 320000 CITY NA & 7 8:06:27 Council Check Register Page - 5 8/23/2007 —8/23/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Descrlptlon Business Unit 2,971.55 167881 18225 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,422.35 300604 812312007 112811 CASTREJON INC. 4,800.00 DIRECTIONAL BORE 00004025 167836 10685 04338.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS -338 DIR BORE 5616 WOODDALE 4,800.00 300605 812312007 116683 CAT 8 FIDDLE BEVERAGE 230.00 167882 47699 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 475.00 168157 48338 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 705.00 300606 8/23/2007 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 102.33- RETURN 00004436 167783 GJH9895 1495.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT INSPECTIONS 258.87 PRINTER DRAWER 00004436 167784 GJG8002 1495.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT INSPECTIONS 156.54 300607 8/23/2007 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY GAS SERVICE 762.92 168117 1494972 5620.6186 HEAT EDINBOROUGH PARK 9,030.22 168118 1495052 5311.6186 HEAT POOL OPERATION 1.16 168119 1495042 1552.6186 HEAT CENT SVC PW BUILDING 9,794.30 300608 812312007 117194 CHAMPIONSHIP PRODUCTS 194.16 SWIMMING GOGGLES 167785 18101 5310.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL ADMINISTRATION 194.16 300609 8/23/2007 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 1,021.35 TOWER TREATMENT 00008091 167786 514129 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 1,021.35 300610 8/23/2007 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 157.00 167883 344552 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 157.00 300611 8/23/2007 114639 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK 6,500.00 COST SHARING ENG DESIGN SRVCS 167837 15889 5923.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COLLECTION SYSTEMS 6,500.00 300612 8/2312007 103040 CITY PAGES 80.66 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 167905 100209322 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 80.66 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 167905 100209322 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING I , CITY OF EDINA 8/22/2007 8:06:27 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 6 8/23/2007 --8/23/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 80.68 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 167905 100209322 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 242.00 300613 8123/2007 100688 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERVICES INC 14.38 WINDOW CLEANING 167838 404822 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY 16.62 WINDOW CLEANING 167838 404822 5621.6160 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 27.04 WINDOW CLEANING 167838 404822 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS YORK OCCUPANCY 58.04 300614 812312007 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 80.20 SAFETY GLASSES LENS 00005441 167970 03112256 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 80.20 300615 812312007 103435 CONNOLE, KELLY 150.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 166120 081707 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 150.00 300616 8123/2007 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES IN 2,742.36 CUSTODIAL SERVICES 167954 7070121642 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,742.38 300617 8123/2007 101616 CRUCIAL TECHNOLOGY 60.99 RAM 00004441 167787 241637321 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 60.99 300618 812312007 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 24.84 114 - 09932336 -1 WATER 168028 859690 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 24.84 300619 8/2312007 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 2,363.41 167884 422229 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 8.80 167885 422228 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,349.75 167886 422227 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 39.60 167887 421337 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,275.97 167888 421336 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,536.40 168158 422226 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 6,573.93 300620 8/2312007 121425 DAYS INN AUSTIN 343.14 LODGING FOR K9 TRIALS 167788 04752 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 343.14 I , 81 1 8:06:27 Page - 7 Business Unit GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL ED ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PAVEMENT MARKINGS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,674.19 POOL CHEMICALS 167789 82701347 -07 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION R55CKREG 320000 CHEMICALS 00005905 167956 82701342 -07 CITY NA WATER TREATMENT 4,999.91 Council Check Register 300628 8123/2007 102659 DPD 8/23/2007 -8/23/2007 372.75 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Descriptlon 300621 8/23/2007 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 300629 8123/2007 104868 DUNN, MATT 50.20 BAKERY 168029 252822 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 082007 1624.6406 43.92 BAKERY 168030 252883 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1600.4390.19 BECOME A MAGICIAN 71.64 BAKERY 168031 252955 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 124.14 BAKERY 168032 253186 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 41.05 BAKERY 168033 253247 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 21.54 BAKERY 168034 253418 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 73.84 BAKERY 168035 253445 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 426.33 300622 8/2312007 111120 DESIGN N PRINT 997.91 PARTY INVITIATIONS 168036 33418 5610.6575 PRINTING 997.91 300623 8/23/2007 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST 16.50 168037 311344119 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 16.50 300624 8/2312007 121096 DIAMOND MOWERS INC. 116.81 BEARING, SEALS 00006078 167981 29547 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 116.81 300625 8/23/2007 100571 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS 2,924.76 PAINT 00001504 167955 802093723 1335.6532 PAINT 2,924.76 300626 8123/2007 121103 DIRECTV 54.73 168038 613481518 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 54.73 300627 8/23/2007 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES 81 1 8:06:27 Page - 7 Business Unit GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL ED ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS PAVEMENT MARKINGS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,674.19 POOL CHEMICALS 167789 82701347 -07 5311.6545 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION 3,325.72 CHEMICALS 00005905 167956 82701342 -07 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 4,999.91 300628 8123/2007 102659 DPD 372.75 CLASS REGISTRATION FORMS 00008097 167790 E19001011 5510.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 372.75 300629 8123/2007 104868 DUNN, MATT 25.00 FAMILY JAMBOREE SUPPLIES 168121 082007 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 350.00 MAGIC CLASS SUPPLIES 168121 082007 1600.4390.19 BECOME A MAGICIAN PARK ADMIN. GENERAL R65CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount 375.00 300630 8123/2007 455.40 1,469.04 1,924.44 300631 8/23/2007 2,234.24 1,076.19 Supplier / Explanation 121439 E GROUP INC. CUPS FRISBEES 100739 EAGLE WINE CITY OF EDINA 8/22/2007 8:06:27 Council Check Register Page - 8 8/23/2007 —8/23/2007 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 168039 5118669 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 168040 5118215 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 167914 638453 167915 638442 168159 638449 168160 729134 300632 8/23/2007 YORK SELLING 119716 EASTERN PACIFIC APPAREL INC. COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 44.38 MERCHANDISE 168041 376355 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 44.38 5620.6201 LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH PARK 300633 8/23/2007 YORK OCCUPANCY 103261 EDINA CLEANERS ALARM SERVICE VERNON OCCUPANCY 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 44.35 LINEN CLEANING 168042 29647 44.35 300634 812312007 103594 EDINALARM INC. 265.18 ALARM SERVICE 167839 44768 265.19 ALARM SERVICE 167839 44768 530.37 300635 8/2312007 120331 EKKLESIA MEDIA SERVICES 80.00 SOUND SYSTEM REPAIR 00008094 167791 3453 100.00 SOUND SYSTEM REPAIR 00008095 167792 3461 180.00 300636 8/23/2007 101956 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC 249.80 E -81 PUMP REPAIR 168043 31869 249.80 300637 812312007 121440 EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWO 4,000.00 E911 REIMBURSE 168044 6233 11,000.00 HEALTH GRANT 168044 6233 15,000.00 300638 8123/2007 100752 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5620.6201 LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH PARK 5841.6250 ALARM SERVICE YORK OCCUPANCY 5861.6250 ALARM SERVICE VERNON OCCUPANCY 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 4608.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE COMPUTER SYSTEM 4205.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PANDEMIC FLU GRANT R55CKREG 320000 CITY AA 81. / 8:06:27 Council Check Register Page - 9 8/23/2007 -8/23/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 316.31 MANHOLE COVERS 00005906 167971 KK4244 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 316.31 300639 8/23/2007 118309 EXTERIOR BUILDING SERVICES INC 1,525.00 APPLY SEALER TO PANELS 168122 9050 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 1,525.00 300640 8/23/2007 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL 21.30 PHOTO FINISHING 00003532 168123 3532 -7/18 1470.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 21.30 300641 8/2312007 100756 FEDERAL EXPRESS 32.56 SHIPPING FEE 168124 2- 202 -14530 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 32.56 300642 8/2312007 101432 FERRELLGAS 12.80 LP TANK RENTAL 00008098 167793 RNT1450952 5521.6581 GASOLINE ARENA ICE MAINT 12.80 300643 8/23/2007 119211 FIRSTLAB 325.00 DRUG SCREENING 167957 235081 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 325.00 300644 8123/2007 119936 GLOBAL OAK 2,081.00 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 167840 432 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 2,081.00 300645 8/2312007 100781 GRAFIX SHOPPE 41.23 SQUAD GRAPHICS 00001967 167794 54352 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 41.23 300646 8/2312007 101103 GRAINGER 132.77 BATTERIES, PAINT 00005440 167795 9426216900 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 59.49 TAPE, MARKING WAND 00005447 167796 9426766250 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 25.72 FLASHLIGHT 00005460 167841 9428748355 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 81.17 TAPE, BATTERIES 00005453 167972 9427640421 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 32.25 NOZZLES 00006273 168045 9426895422 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 331.40 300647 8/23/2007 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 207.50 167916 93161 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 474.50 167917 93163 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/23/2007 -8/23/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 435.00 168161 93165 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/22/2007 8:06:27 Page - 10 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 1,117.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 300648 8/2312007 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 80.29 TRASH BAGS VERNON SELLING 167958 081507 5840.6406 YORK SELLING 80.29 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 300649 8123/2007 VERNON SELLING 102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 347.72 GOLF BALLS 00006092 168046 35729 5440.5511 347.72 300650 8123/2007 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 6,295.27 167918 638456 5842.5512 156.70 167919 638455 5842.5515 5,888.00 167920 630617 5842.5512 5.70 167921 634697 5842.5512 129.70 167922 638249 5842.5513 1,584.11 167923 638454 5842.5513 324.25 167924 636682 5862.5513 28.95 167925 638448 5862.5515 101.16 167926 634946 5862.5515 666.85 167927 638248 5862.5513 29.31- 167928 729047 5842.5513 .95 168162 638192 5842.5512 162.75 168163 638250 5822.5513 664.94 168164 638450 5822.5513 2,108.66 168165 638443 5862.5513 152.93 168166 636815 5862.5512 3,557.46 168167 638447 5862.5512 826.51 168168 638451 5822.5512 13.90- 168169 730125 5842.5513 22,611.68 300651 8123/2007 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 227.70 THERMAL TAPE 00007515 167797 254944 5842.6512 227.70 300652 812312007 100797 HAWKINS INC. 1,970.76 TONKAZORB 3% 00005444 167973 1095405 5915.6586 5,286.66 MAGDOS PUMPS 00005444 167973 1095405 5915.6406 7,257.42 GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/22/2007 8:06:27 Page - 10 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT R55CKREC:° "'.320000 CITY NA 6; 7 8:06:27 Council Check Register Page - 11 8/23/2007 8/23/2007 z Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 300653 8123/2007 119474 HAY DOBBSc 13,345.95 FIRE STATION ARCHITECT 168047 6004.006 -4 -- - - 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 13,345.95 300654 8123/2007 101576 HEGGIES PIZZA 84.15 PIZZA 168048 1003716 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 84.15 300655 8/2312007 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 200.64 MEAT PATTIES 168049 020460 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 200.64 . 300656 8/2312007 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 1,754.40 RADIO ADMIN FEE ., 168125 27078014 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,754.40 300657 8/2312007 .101215 HENNEPIN COUNTY - SHERIFF'S OFFI 342.24 JULY 2007 - ,BOOKING FEE 167798 1633 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES 342.24 300658 8123/2007 102460. HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER. 105.57 POSTAL VERIFICATION CARDS 168050 080907 1180.6235 POSTAGE ELECTION 105.57 300659 8/23/2007 118765 HENRY SCHEIN INC. 109.10 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003852 168051 4590649 -01 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 109.10 300660 812312007 116680 ,HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 607.57.. PC 00004442 167799 .42726488 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY • 607.57. 300661 8/2312007 103753 HILLYARD INC. 18736 CLEANERS 00002158:.168052 2207397 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES °' EDINBOROUGH PARK 155.61 "HAND SANITIZER, BOWL CLEANER 00002158 168053 2207398 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 285.71 VACUUM HOSES 00002104 168054'--7159405 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 628.68 300662 8123/2007 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 586.00 168170 427876 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 405.46 168171 427871 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK.SELLING 527.77 168172 427872 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 8/22/2007 8:06:27 Page - 12 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK ED ADMINISTRATION ED ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 150.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 168126 081707 CITY OF EDINA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES R55CKREG LOG20000 150.00 300667 8/2312007 Council Check Register 8/23/2007 --8/23/2007 081707 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,519.23 300668 8/23/2007 121161 IDEARC MEDIA CORP 300663 8123/2007 100417 HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY 133.66 PHONE BOOK ADVERTISING 167842 390012118246 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 169.98 SCALE REMOVER 00002147 168055 7072323 5620.6545 CHEMICALS 5841.6188 TELEPHONE 169.98 133.68 PHONE BOOK ADVERTISING 167842 390012118246 300664 8/2312007 VERNON OCCUPANCY' 100842 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 401.00 59.85 OFFICE MAX SUPPLIES 167974 080607 5610.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 85.71 OFFICE MAX SUPPLIES 167974 080607 5610.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 4608.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 145.56 8,698.10 300665 8/23/2007 101997 HUDSON MAP COMPANY 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY 213.00 MAPS 00003880 168056 2480 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS 213.00 284.85 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 00005464 167843 4118425 -01 300666 8/23/2007 POOL OPERATION 121443 HURINENKO, JEFFREY 503.87 CORES & COILS 00005450 167844 4117934 -02 8/22/2007 8:06:27 Page - 12 Business Unit EDINBOROUGH PARK ED ADMINISTRATION ED ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 150.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 168126 081707 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 150.00 300667 8/2312007 101455 W.O.E. LOCAL 49 TRAINING PRO 3,600.00 PHASE I & II EO (8) 168127 081707 1281.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS TRAINING 3,600.00 300668 8/23/2007 121161 IDEARC MEDIA CORP 133.66 PHONE BOOK ADVERTISING 167842 390012118246 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 133.66 PHONE BOOK ADVERTISING 167842 390012118246 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 133.68 PHONE BOOK ADVERTISING 167842 390012118246 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY' 401.00 300669 8/23/2007 100416 INDEPENDENT EMERGENCY SERVICES 8,698.10 911 SYSTEM UPGRADE 167800 IESINVO01842 4608.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE COMPUTER SYSTEM 8,698.10 300670 8/23/2007 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY 225.25 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 00005464 167843 4118425 -01 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 284.85 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 00005464 167843 4118425 -01 5311.6530 REPAIR PARTS POOL OPERATION 503.87 CORES & COILS 00005450 167844 4117934 -02 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,119.27 FUSES 00005450 167845 4117934 -01 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,133.24 300671 8123/2007 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 4,211.17 167889 1094384 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING R55CKREL 320000 CITY NA Council Check Register 8/23/2007 8/23/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 339.00 168057 1098198 5421.5514 34.50 168173 1101240 5822.5515 2,041.40 168174 1101239 5822.5514 42.00 168175 1101238 5862.5515 5,454.10 168176 1101237 5862.5514 15,756.87 168177 1101243 5842.5514 27,879.04 300672 8/23/2007 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 6,281.40 168178 1302804 5862.5512 62.08 168179 1304587 5862.5512 1,257.40 168180 1304578 5822.5513 98.92 168181 1304580 5822.5512 1,926.04 168182 1304579 5822.5512 7,507.58 168183 1304585 5842.5512 299.24 168184 1304582 5842.5512 2,847.06 168185 1304586 5842.5513 3,430.28 168186 1304584 5842.5512 1.08 168187 1304581 5842.5513 3,363.62 168188 1304583 5842.5513 260.33 168189 1304576 5822.5513 271.06 168190 1304577 5822.5513 36.08 168191 1304589 5862.5513 221.08 168192 1304588 5862.5513 1,300.60 168193 1304593 5862.5513 12.40- 168194 351282 5842.5513 490.80- 168195 351454 5842.5513 226.16- 168196 351881 5842.5513 28,434.49 300673 8/23/2007 118336 JONES AND BARTLETT PUBLISHERS 262.42 LIFEGUARD TRAINING BOOKS 167801 1496038 5310.6406 262.42 300674 8123/2007 111018 KEEPRS INC. 119.99 UNIFORMS 00003749 168058 70499 -03 1470.6558 119.99 300675 8/2312007 116295 KING PAR CORPORATION 237.30 GOLF CLUBS 168059 2440797 5440.5511 237.30 Subledger Account Descrlptlon COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE GENERAL SUPPLIES DEPT UNIFORMS 6. 7 8:06:27 Page - 13 Business Unit GRILL 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING POOL ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/2212007 8:06:27 Council Check Register Page - 14 8/23/2007 --8/23/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 300676 8123/2007 105887 KOESSLER, JOE 158.00 AUGUST SERVICES 167982 080107 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 158.00 300877 812312007 120987 KUNDE CONSULTANTS INC. 2,382.93 OAK WILT TREE INSPECTION 167802 1180 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 2,382.93 300678 8/2312007 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 235.04 TY -RAP, O -RINGS 00005379 167803 5896084 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 348.80 HARDWARE 00005381 167846 5900637 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 91.41 HOSE CLAMPS 00005380 167975 5896085 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 675.25 300679 8123/2007 101887 LEAGUE OF MINN HUMAN RIGHTS CO 75.00 ANNUAL CONFERENCE 167959 081507 1504.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS HUMAN RELATION COMMISSION 75.00 300680 8/23/2007 100853 LEEF SERVICES 33.91 SHOP TOWELS 167983 1386126 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 33.91 300681 8123/2007 100854 LEITNER COMPANY 1,075.22 1 -1 -1 00006123 167986 080107 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 812.45 TOPDRESSING SAND 00006080 167987 AUG1 5422.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,887.67 300682 8/23/2007 100855 LESCO INC. 235.35 MOLE BAIT, ANTIFOAM 167984 EECt FA6F 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 65.76 LAPPING COMPOUND 167985 4CC8A2FA 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 301.11 300683 8/23/2007 117407 LEXISNEXIS 110.00 BACKGROUND CHECKS 167804 0707253501 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 110.00 300684 812312007 101314 LITTLE BLIND SPOT, THE 1,733.06 WINDOW SHADES 00004026 167847 57479 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,733.06 300685 8123/2007 110888 LOPEZ, ELIZABETH 32.63 MAAP WORKSHOP EXPENSE 168128 082007 1190.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ASSESSING R55CKREG 520000 167892 225712 CITY NA YORK SELLING 1,739.05 167893 225711 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Council Check Register 2,753.68 167894 224883 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 8123/2007 --8/23/2007 224680 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 50TH ST SELLING 39.90 167.8.1 MAAP WORKSHOP EXPENSE 168128 082007 1190.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 167929 224907 200.44 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 141.45 167930 224909 300686 8/2312007 VERNON SELLING 101792 LUBE -TECH 167931 224905 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING .03 61.09 GREASE 00006069 167988 1431862 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 168060 226727 61.09 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 978.65 168197 227321 300687 8/23/2007 50TH ST SELLING 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 168198 227536 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 15,519.68 665.77 167890 20805 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 121441 MED ALLIANCE GROUP INC. 1,873.65 167891 20363 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 308.46 CANDY 168129 21037 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 300692 8/2312007 2,847.88 300688 8/23/2007 101741 M. SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS INC. 30.00 WINE SPECTATOR 167848 543232 5822.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 30.00 300689 8/23/2007 121430 MADISON MARQUETTE 1,107.28 WATER BILL REFUND 167849 081407 5900.1211.1 ACCTS RECEIVABLE MANUAL 1,107.28 300690 8123/2007 100868 MARK VII SALES 81. , 7 8:06:27 Page- 15 Business Unit ASSESSING MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING POOL CONCESSIONS 50TH ST SELLING UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 58.20 167892 225712 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,739.05 167893 225711 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,753.68 167894 224883 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,314.76 167895 224680 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 86.00 167896 224681 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 39.90 167897 224682 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,650.04 167929 224907 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 141.45 167930 224909 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING .03 167931 224905 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING .03 167932 224906 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 240.00 168060 226727 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 978.65 168197 227321 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,517.89 168198 227536 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 15,519.68 300691 8/2312007 121441 MED ALLIANCE GROUP INC. 509.93 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003851 168061 57977 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 509.93 300692 8/2312007 101483 MENARDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/23/2007 -8/23/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 43.88 PADLOCKS 00008088 167805 55381 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 25.33 MOULDING 00005251 167850 57407 1646.6577 LUMBER 20.16 HOSE CLAMPS 00006075 167989 55696 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 72.88 DOORSTOP, SCRUB BRUSHES 00006276 168062 59443 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 162.25 300693 8/23/2007 102281 MENARDS 31.57 STORAGE CARTS 00005445 167806 63598 5911.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 31.57 300694 8/23/2007 118953 MERCURY OFFICE SUPPLY 373.25 OFFICE PAPER 00009202 168063 707543-0 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 10.13 CARDSTOCK 00009202 168064 707543 -2 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 74.53 INKCART 00009202 168065 707543 -1 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 457.91 300695 8/23/2007 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 400.62 GRILL CLEANER, COMET 00006283 168066 72409 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 400.62 300696 8/23/2007 120605 METEORLOGIX 1,002.00 WEATHER SERVICE 168130 2018531 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,002.00 300697 8123/2007 121431 METRO WOOD RECYCLING INC. 2,062.50 WOOD WASTE DISPOSAL 00001466 167851 00010033 1644.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 2,062.50 300698 8/23/2007 100410 METROCALL 362.21 PAGERS 168131 00319246H 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 362.21 300699 8123/2007 116712 METROPOLITAN MEDIA GROUP INC. 335.33 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 168132 12906 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 335.33 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 168132 12906 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 335.34 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 168132 12906 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1,006.00 300700 8/23/2007 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 187.20 167933 0198061416 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 323.20 167934 0148268627 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 510.40 8/22/2007 8:06:27 Page- 16 Business Unit ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RANGE PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GRILL SNOW & ICE REMOVAL TREES & MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKREL G20000 CITY NA 6, 17 8:06:27 Council Check Register Page- 17 8/23/2007 -8/23/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 300701 812312007 103186 MIDWEST FUELS 546.07 DIESEL FUEL 167807 39958 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 946.07 DIESEL FUEL 167807 39958 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 930.74 GENERATOR FUEL 167852 39862 5911.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 1,232.02 GENERATOR FUEL 167852 39862 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 1,229.33 DIESEL FUEL FOR GENERATORS 00005330 167976 40121 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 1,553.74 DIESEL FUEL FOR GENERATORS 00005330 167976 40121 5911.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 1,341.15 FUEL 00006252 167990 39820 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 950.11 GASOLINE 00006252 167991 39877 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CARS 503.50 DIESEL 00005252 167992 39878 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 427.61 DIESEL 00005252 167993 41802 5431.6581 GASOLINE RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 821.60 GASOLINE 00006252 167994 41800 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 10,481.94 300702 8/23/2007 102222 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSP 5.00 MAILING LIST UPDATES FEE 168133 2919 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 5.00 300703 8123/2007 106193 MINNESOTA HIGHWAY SAFETY AND 415.00 PIT COURSE - MIKE SEEGER 167808 080907 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 415.00 300704 812312007 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT 207.68 METER COUPLINGS 00005329 167977 0211886 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 207.68 300705 8123/2007 105199 MN FALL MAINTENANCE EXPO 425.00 ST CLOUD EXPO REGISTRATION 167960 081407 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 425.00 300706 8/2312007 120996 MOBILE MINI INC. 599.91 TRAILER RENTAL 168067 151003892 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 599.91 300707 8/23/2007 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 369.39 REAR AXLE 00005179 167809 589910 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,498.49 TERRABROOM 00006129 167995 588710-00 5400.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT GOLF BALANCE SHEET 980.87 OSMAC DECODER 00006076 167996 589360 -00 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 344.11 MOUNT ASSEMBLY 167997 587718 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 4,192.86 R55CKREG LOG20000 336.80 MERCHANDISE CITY OF EDINA 910490197 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES Council Check Register MERCHANDISE 168070 910479634 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 8/2312007 -8123/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account DescrlpUon 300708 8/23/2007 386.97 105323 MTM RECOGNITION 168072 910485361 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP 1,848.51 RETIREMENT WATCHES 167961 5251395 1513.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 168073 910375701 1,848.51 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 300709 8123/2007 106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS 300711 812312007 61.14 TABLEWARE 00002130 168068 29161 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 61.14 225.00 FALL CONFERENCE - VICKI OLSON 168134 300710 812312007 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 104350 NIKE USA INC. 225.00 8/22/2007 8:06:27 Page - 18 Business Unit EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS EDINBOROUGH PARK 336.80 MERCHANDISE 168069 910490197 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 67.36 MERCHANDISE 168070 910479634 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 303.36 MERCHANDISE 168071 910485362 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 386.97 MERCHANDISE 168072 910485361 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 262.35 MERCHANDISE 168073 910375701 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,356.84 300711 812312007 120166 NORTHSTAR CHAPTER APA 225.00 FALL CONFERENCE - VICKI OLSON 168134 081607 1160.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FINANCE 225.00 300712 8/2312007 105901 OERTEL ARCHITECTS 959.50 CONSULTING SERVICES 167853 #2 -7/29 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING 959.50 300713 8123/2007 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 33.53 TAPES 00006034 168074 396342898- 001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 11.47 BATTERIES, TABS 168075 394486424 -001 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 27.34 CALENDAR PRINTING 168076 394812921 -001 5610.6575 PRINTING ED ADMINISTRATION 72.34 300714 8/2312007 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 3.84 LINCH PINS 00006064 167998 461039 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 45.11 TRIMMER HANDLE 00006064 167999 461038 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 48.95 300715 812312007 115668 ON CALL SERVICES 9,860.00 REPLACE CONCRETE HALLWAY 00002139 168077 1652 5600.1720 BUILDINGS EB /CL BALANCE SHEET 9,860.00 300718 8/23/2007 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 161.19 COOKIES 168078 29105373 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 101.88 COOKIES 168135 30287673 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS R55CKREG 320000 CITY NA Bi' ":7 8:06:27 Council Check Register Page - 19 - 8/23/2007 --8/23/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 263.07 300717 8123/2007 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 120.00 COMBUSTION AIR - WATER HEATER 167962 15510 2127.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMM DEV BILK GRANT 120.00 300718 8123/2007 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 70.84 REPAIRS 00006278 168000 15043 5210.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 70.84 300719 812312007 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 361,102.70 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 168136 081707 01336.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA336 W70TH - FRANCE TO YORK - 361,102.70 300720 ` 8/23.12007 118187 =PARETO•HOLLROCK/SGD GOLF 652.64. BALL CLEANER 00006329-168079 . 408000. 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 652.64 300721 - 8/2312007 100941 PARK NICOLLET CLINIC 416:00 .PRE EMP PHYSICALS 167854 081007 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL - 416.00 300722 8/2312007 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 42.06 168199 8155310 -IN 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,292.01 168200 8155306 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 331:50 168201 8155307 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 787.00 168202 8155308 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 78.00- 168203 8154873 -CM 5842.5513 COST.OF.GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,374.51 300723 8/2312007 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 660.90 _ 00006279 168001 44888673 5210.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GOLF DOME PROGRAM 331.20 168002 43809633 5210.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GOLF DOME PROGRAM 1,185.00 168080 13046699 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 2,177.10 300724 812312007 - 100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR_ S " 1,350.00 ,SOCCER FIELD REPAIRS 00005472 167855 081007 1642.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIELD MAINTENANCE 925.00 TURF REPAIR AT SKATE PARK 00005473 167856 8 -10 -007 1647.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS' PATHS & HARD SURFACE 2,275.00 300725 8/23/2007 119372 PETSMART #463 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/22/2007 8:06:27 Council Check Register Page - 20 8/23/2007 --8/23/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 36.25 K9 DOG FOOD 00003008 168137 T -9967 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 36.25 300726 8/2312007 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 190.15 167935 2498292 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6,964.40 168204 2500639 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,465.32 168205 2500634 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 49.08 168206 2500637 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 328.97 168207 2500635 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,923.07 168208 2500636 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 14,920.99 300727 8/23/2007 103256 POKORNY COMPANY 59.46 REPAIR PARTS 00006066 168081 21440 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 59.46 300728 8/2312007 100819 POPP.COM 245.00 PHONE INSTALLATION 168082 86887 5626.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 245.00 300729 812312007 121436 POWER/MATION 5,861.30 VOLTMETERS 00001405 168138 1992424 -00 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 5,861.30 300730 8123/2007 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 108.00 BLADE SHARPENING 00008099 167810 228847 5521.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ARENA ICE MAINT 108.00 300731 8/23/2007 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 537.59 167936 638457 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 349.75 167937 638446 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 124.90 168209 638452 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,012.24 300732 8123/2007 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 528.55 ROLL TOWELS, LINERS 00002149 168083 4022 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 528.55 300733 812312007 100971 QUALITY WINE 680.00 167898 895307 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,307.89 167938 896556 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,025.80 167939 895754 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG 4320000 CITY NA 8i. J 8:06:27 Council Check Register Page - 21 8/23/2007 -8/23/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,671.10 167940 896191 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 911.50 167941 894985 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,205.46 167942 896192 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 984.30 167943 896265 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 166.30 167944 896403 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 20.01 CREDIT TAKEN TWICE 167945 15433 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 889.85 168210 895755 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,453.53 168211 896557 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 622.35 168212 896193 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 138.81 168213 896567 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 22.50- 168214 884090 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 28.03- 168215 892695 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 129.95- 168216 892724 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 16,896.42 300734 8/23/2007 101111 REED BUSINESS INFORMATION 176.17 AD FOR BID 168084 3713821 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 537.43 AD FOR BID 168085 3697662 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 713.60 300735 8/23/2007 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 100.00 CLEAN OUT FLOOR DRAIN 00006284 168086 47029 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL 100.00 300736 812312007 100978 RIEDELL SHOES 104.49 RENTAL SKATES, LACES 00008093 167811 5366192 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 104.49 300737 8/2312007 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 36.18 SWIVEL JACK 00005180 167812 1336709 -01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 36.18 300738 812312007 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 906.32 WATER SOFTENER SALT 00008078 167813 00195439 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 31.52 SOFTENER SALT 00003648 168139 00196130 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 937.84 300739 812312007 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 358.20 FLUORESCENT BULB DISPOSAL 168003 P001699872 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 418.50 DRUM BARREL DISPOSAL 168004 M004291922 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 148.57 WASTE FUEL DISPOSAL 168005 003468893 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 925.27 CITY OF EDINA 8/22/2007 8:06:27 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 22 8/23/2007 --8/23/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 300740 8/23/2007 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 53.85 BAKERY 168087 191540 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 53.85 300741 8123/2007 101232 SALUD AMERICA 325.00 168217 EMLS081607 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 325.00 300742 8/2312007 119774 SAMS, WADE 179.90 IRRIGATION REPAIR 00002157 168088 193938 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 179.90 300743 8/23/2007 103369 SANKEY, MOREAU J. 99.00 REAL ESTATE CONFERENCE 168089 081707 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 99.00 300744 8/23/2007 100305 SARA LEE FOOD SERVICES 330.50 COFFEE 168090 300581320586 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 330.50 300745 8/2312007 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 161.97 LUMBER, STAKES 00005354 167814 40514577 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 161.97 300746 8/23/2007 103970 SEEGER, MICHAEL 63.85 MEAL REIMBURSEMENT 168140 081307 1400.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 63.85 300747 812312007 120944 SHAUGNHESSY, DALTON 62.00 CRAFT SUPPLIES 168141 081707 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 62.00 300748 8/23/2007 106415 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY 2,530.00 MINI HAWKS SPORTS CAMP 167857 324721916 1600.4390.22 MINI HAWKS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 2,530.00 300749 8123/2007 104098 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 41,730.46 MICROSOFT CONTRACT RENEWAL00004440 167815 AC18B 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 41,730.46 300750 8/2312007 102935 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION INC R55CKREL G20000 CITY INA Council Check Register 8/23/2007 -8/23/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,823.90 COOLER REPAIRS 00006340 168091 61717 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5422.6180 5842.5513 5301.4541 CONTRACTED REPAIRS b. j7 8:06:27 Page- 23 Business Unit GRILL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING GENERAL ADMISSIONS 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1400.6551 AMMUNITION 1400.6551 AMMUNITION 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2210.6123 2210.6123 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ADAPTIVE RECREATION MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION 1,823.90 300751 812312007 105193 SPAIN, MARK 2,485.00 TREE TRIMMING & REMOVAL 168006 070907 2,485.00 300752 8/23/2007 118882 SPECIALTY WINES & BEVERAGES 76.00 168218 16358 76.00 300753 8/23/2007 118784 ST. ANDREW LUTHERAN CHURCH 73.00 PARTIAL REFUND 168142 081707 73.00 300754 8/2312007 101015 STREICHERS 6.38 TIE BAR 167816 1452214 532.50 TRAINING AMMO 167817 1451627 1,610.38 AMMO 167818 1451577 1,610.38- RETURN 167819 CM220003 538.88 300755 8/23/2007 121428 STROMGREN, ERIN 298.90 INCLUSION SERVICES 167858 081407 298.90 300756 8/23/2007 100593 SULLIVAN, JOSEPH F 300.00 HISTORICAL COLUMN 167859 300 300.00 HISTORICAL COLUMN 167860 301 600.00 300757 8123/2007 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 71.50 AD FOR BID 00014798 168092 1003600 67.93 AD FOR BID 00014798 168093 1003599 729.30 PUBLISH ORD 00014798 168094 1005745 25.03 PUBLISH NOTICE 00014798 168095 1005746 107.25 PUBLISH ORD 00014798 168096 1005744 78.65 AD FOR BID 00014798 168097 1005742 71.50 AD FOR BID 00014798 168098 1005743 100.10 PUBLISH TIF DISCLOSURE 00014798 168099 1008345 60.78 PUBLISH NOTICE 00014798 168100 1013259 32.18 PUBLISH NOTICE 00014798 168101 1013258 5422.6180 5842.5513 5301.4541 CONTRACTED REPAIRS b. j7 8:06:27 Page- 23 Business Unit GRILL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING GENERAL ADMISSIONS 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1400.6551 AMMUNITION 1400.6551 AMMUNITION 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2210.6123 2210.6123 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 1120.6120 AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ADAPTIVE RECREATION MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/23/2007 -8/23/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 10,071.30 r , 4 . 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5320.5510 1,344.22 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 300758 8/23/2007 COST OF GOODS SOLD 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. CLEANING SUPPLIES 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5862.5514 492.00 VERNON SELLING 5862.5515 167899 662016 404.00 167900 662003 896.00 300759 8/23/2007 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA 617.51 CONCESSION PRODUCT 167820 708091315 66.45 CUPS, TRAYS, PLATES 167821 708111550 219.06 CLEANING SUPPLIES 167821 708111550 595.15 CONCESSION PRODUCT 167821 708111550 180.69 CLEANING SUPPLIES 168143 708161315 519.67. CONCESSION PRODUCT 168143 708161315 2,198.53 300760 8123/2007 121429 TEIGEN, DON 32.08 WATER BILL REFUND 167861 081307 32.08 300761 8123/2007 113549 TENNIS WEST 2,494.20 INSTALL CHAIN LINK FENCE 00001883 167978 07-467 10,085.80 INSTALL CHAIN LINK FENCE 00001883 167978 07467 12,580.00 300762 8/2312007 101028 TERRY ANN SALES CO 557.20 WATER CUPS 168102 2457 557.20 300763 8/2312007 116482 THAYER, TIMOTHY R. 499.50 CPR TRAINING 00006281 168007 7027 150.00 CPR MANIKEN RENTALS 00006277 168008 7028 649.50 300764 8/2312007 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 4,691.20 167901 457871 25.90 167902 457870 233.35 168103 458097 115.00 168104 28619 4,891.55 168219 458734 114.30 168220 458735 10,071.30 r , 4 . 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5900.1211.1 ACCTS RECEIVABLE MANUAL 1621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5410.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 5210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8/22/2007 8:06:27 Page- 24 Business Unit YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING POOL CONCESSIONS POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION POOL CONCESSIONS POOL OPERATION POOL CONCESSIONS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF ADMINISTRATION GOLF DOME PROGRAM 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING CITY, NA 11 1 8:06:27 R55CKREG j20000 Council Check Register Page - 25 8/23/2007 --8/23/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 300765 812312007 101293 TODD, DARRELL 31.98 STOPWATCHES 168144 081707 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 31.98 300788 8123/2007 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 25.02 OXYGEN 00005443 167963 180951 5913.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 25.02 300767 8/2312007 116535 TRAVELERS 90.00 DEDUCTIBLE 167964 000269098 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 90.00 300768 812312007 102686 TREASURER -STATE OF MINNESOTA 438.00 AMBULANCE LICENSE FEES (3) 168145 081707 1470.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 438.00 300769 812312007 100682 TRUGREEN - CHEMLAWN 53.33 WEED CONTROL 00005476 167862 001784 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 143.98 FERTILIZER 00005475 167863 518814 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 105.00 FERTILIZER 00005474 167864 105728 1643.6540 FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE 28.80 FERTILIZER/WEED CONTROL 00005479 167965 010213 1643.6540 FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE 37.33 FERTILIZER/WEED CONTROL 167966 002601 1643.6540 FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE 368.44 300770 8/2312007 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 415.04 STARTER, TINES 00006072 168009 T116860A 5431.6530 REPAIR PARTS RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 309.32 TINES, HOLDERS 00006072 168010 T116860A 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 724.36 300771 812312007 102255 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO 43.91 OXYGEN 00003649 168105 889796 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 18.82 OXYGEN 00003649 168106 889804 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 151.71 OXYGEN 00003649 168107 257133 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 214.44 300772 8123/2007 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 244.95 FERTILIZER 00005266 167865 17320 1643.6540 FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE 244.95 300773 8/23/2007 101053 UNITED ELECTRIC COMPANY 628.15 HEATER ELEMENT 00005371 167822 962548 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS LIFT STATION MAINT CITY OF EDINA 8/2212007 8:06:27 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 26 8/23/2007 -8/2312007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 628.15 300774 8123/2007 100888 URS CORPORATION 9,102.50 COMP PLAN CONSULTANT 167866 2959276 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 2,517.00 70TH ST LANDSCAPE PLAN 167867 2959278 01236.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN A -236 W70TH LANDSCAPING . 11,619.50 300775 8123/2007 102225 VALLIERE, ANITA 126.10 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 168146 081607 5410.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 126.10 300776 812312007 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 238.08 UTENSILS, PLATES 00005439 167823 048055-00 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 732.69 LINERS, TOWELS, CUPS 00006347 168108 047541 -00 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 117.20 TISSUE 00006347 168109 047541 -01 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 1,087.97 300777 812312007 121442 VANDER LOOP, SETH 135.00 RENTAL REFUND 168147 082007 1600.4722.09 ROSLAND RENTAL PARK ADMIN'. GENERAL 135.00 300778 812312007 102070 VERIZON WIRELESS 2.22 168148 1744479409 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 11.23 168148 1744479409 1190.6188 TELEPHONE ASSESSING 31.21 168148 1744479409 1140.6188 TELEPHONE PLANNING 40.28 168148 1744479409 1490.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH 41.63 168148 1744479409 1120.6188 TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION 90.99 168148 1744479409 1640.6188 TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 226.94 168148 1744479409 1600.6188 TELEPHONE PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 352.33 168148 1744479409 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 796.83 300779 812312007 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 85.55 DC CORD SET 00006073 168011 32008 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 85.55 300780 8/23/2007 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 15.44 MIRROR LENS 00005310 167824 207377 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 15.44 300781 8/2312007 119730 WEB ELECTRIC 595.92 INSTALL POND PUMP CORD 168012 1628 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 8. 7 8:06:27 Page - 27 Business Unit ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ASSESSING 125.00 PRESENTATION 168013 081507 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 125.00 300785 8/23/2007 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,118.95 168221 172722 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 326.15 R55CKRE(s .320000 172729 -00 5822.5513 CITY NA 714.90 168223 172883 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE Council Check Register 2,160.00 8/23/2007 -8/23/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 595.92 525.40 168225 201300 5862.5513 300782 8/23/2007 721.97 103196 WHEELER HARDWARE CO 201302 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,232.43 1,500.68 DOOR REPAIR 00008096 167825 051921 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 405.40 168228 1,500.68 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,238.02 300783 8/23/2007 105613 WICKLUND, MITZI 300787 8/2312007 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 229.96 MAAP WORKSHOP EXPENSE 168149 082007 1190.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 229.96 3,504.42 167946 198235 5842.5513 300784 8/23/2007 68.00 121435 WILLIAMS, BOB 198334 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 8. 7 8:06:27 Page - 27 Business Unit ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ASSESSING 125.00 PRESENTATION 168013 081507 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 125.00 300785 8/23/2007 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,118.95 168221 172722 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 326.15 168222 172729 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 714.90 168223 172883 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,160.00 300786 8123/2007 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 352.82 168224 201298 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 525.40 168225 201300 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 721.97 168226 201302 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,232.43 168227 201301 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 405.40 168228 201299 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,238.02 300787 8/2312007 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 936.00 167903 196427 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,504.42 167946 198235 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 68.00 168229 198334 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.404.00 168230 196617 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 300788 8/23/2007 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 25,632.75 GATEWAY AUAR 25,632.75 300789 8/23/2007 101726 XCEL ENERGY 379.99 51 -4197645 -8 4,705.82 51- 5888961 -7 168150 4- JULY252007 1500.6103 167826 120745594 1322.6185 167827 120784185 1375.6185 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL LIGHT & POWER PARKING RAMP 345.00 300793 812312007 CITY OF EDINA 8/2212007 8:06:27 R55CKREG LOG20000 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 168233 081307 9,483.81 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 168233 081307 15,422.73 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 168233 081307 Council Check Register PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 Page - 28 081307 25,431.97 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 168233 081307 8/23/2007 —8/23/2007 168233 081307 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 4,517.82 51- 6621207 -1 167828 121315695 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 168234 AUG132007 4,488.44 51- 5619094 -8 167979 120777340 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 4,056.74 51- 6227619 -3 168110 121306600 5630.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENTENNIAL LAKES 18,148.81 300790 812312007 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 374.84 COPIER MAINTENANCE 168014 026811713 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 374.84 300791 812312007 117094 YOUTH FOOTBALL YEARBOOK 90.00 YEARBOOK AD 168015 061307 5210.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 90.00 300792 8123/2007 101091 ZIEGLER INC 345.00 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE 167967 E3809741 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 345.00 300793 812312007 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 7,695.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 168233 081307 9,483.81 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 4 168233 081307 15,422.73 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 168233 081307 17,094.30 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 168233 081307 25,431.97 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 168233 081307 47,653.14 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 168233 081307 212,111.92 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 168233 081307 226,161.49 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 168233 081307 561,054.36 300794 8123/2007 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 26,634.86 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 168234 AUG132007 26,634.86 1,467,904.33 Grand Total 03432.1705.30 05463.1705.30 03431.1705.30 04334.1705.30 05462.1705.30 01338.1705.30 04333.1705.30 01337.1705.30 07098.1705.30 Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,467,904.33 Total Payments 1,467,904.33 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SS -432 SOUTHDALE 1 ST ADD WM463 SOUTHDALE 1ST SS431 WOODHILL STS -334 SOUTHDALE 1 ST ADD WM462 WOODHILL BA-338 SOUTHDALE 1ST ADDITION STS -333 WOODHILL BA -337 WOODHILL NEIGHBORHOOD CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS S098 W. 66th St. T . • CITY OI % - 8/2. 8:08:16 R55CKSUM , ,000 Council Check Summary Page - 1 8/23/2007 - 8/23/2007 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 182,074.51 02100 CDBG FUND 120.00 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 2,741.99 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 702,108.99 05100 ART CENTER FUND 836.41 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 1,462.90 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 15,652.71 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 29,794.09 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 4,250.27 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 21,973.19 05800 LIQUOR FUND 179,738.67 05900 UTILITY FUND 91,411.32 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 234,006.22 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 1,733.06 Report Totals 1,467,904.33 WW belief, that these dab* e;o * In afl nWw W mspwft with the fequhenents of the city of E" pn9 P� and �eaures � T CONCRETE 117037 ADI MEDICAL 1314.6520 R55CKREG LOG20000 STREET RENOVATION CITY OF EDINA NITRILE GLOVES 168645 0055246 -IN Council Check Register 372.00 7411.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 8/3012007 -8/30/2007 300797 8130/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 300795 8/3012007 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 29.41 ALARM SERVICE 168392 43.08 168317 701496 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 53.08 168318 609459 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 37.08 168319 609460 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 67.64 168544 701581 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 109.16 168545 609462 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 69.64 168546 701497 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 24.04 168547 701579 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 39.64 168548 701580 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 300796 8130/2007 CONCRETE 117037 ADI MEDICAL 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 372:00 NITRILE GLOVES 168645 0055246 -IN REPAIR PARTS 372.00 7411.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PSTF OCCUPANCY 300797 8130/2007 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 105162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 5510.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT ARENA ADMINISTRATION 29.41 ALARM SERVICE 168392 55178179 29.41 300798 8130/2007 102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES 831.98 READY MIX 00005902 168445 4198872 1,507.96 READY MIX 00005902 168446 4198659 2,339.94 300799 8/30/2007 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 40.58 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 168499 79830 69.19 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 168500 79828 82.15 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 168501 79937 71.13 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 168503 79829 192.89 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 00008009 168646 79826 73.61 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 168647 79925 529.55 300800 8/30/2007 101479 AMERICAN SERVICE CORP. 168.19 OLYMPIC 04 -615 MAINTENANCE 168393 6988 168.19 300801 8130/2007 102172 APPERTS FOODSERVICE 25.61 FOOD 168235 807317 519.58 FOOD 168236 808646 545.19 8/29/2007 8:12:26 Page- 1 Business Unit YORK SELLING 50TH.ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING 1400.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5111.6250 ALARM SERVICE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 5861.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE VERNON OCCUPANCY 5111.6530 REPAIR PARTS ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 7411.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PSTF OCCUPANCY 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 5510.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT ARENA ADMINISTRATION 5311.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL OPERATION 5861.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE VERNON OCCUPANCY 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/29/2007 8:12:26 Council Check Register Page - 2 8/30/2007 --8130/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 300802 8/30/2007 104235 APPLIED MEDIA 100.00 PERFORMANCE 9/4/07 168648 081707 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 100.00 300803 813012007 103065 AQUA CITY IRRIGATION INC 490.92 SPRINKLER REPAIR 168457 23712 05464.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM-464 TODD PARK NHOOD 349.21 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00001687 168458 23696 05463.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM463 SOUTHDALE 1ST 840.13 300804 813012007 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 148.95 SPRINKLER REPAIR 168459 17815 04328.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS -328 AMY DR 118.21 SPRINKLER REPAIR 168460 19298 04328.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS -328 AMY DR 267.16 300805 8/3012007 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 81.74 MURIATIC ACID 00002156 168504 31013 5620.6545 CHEMICALS EDINBOROUGH PARK 81.74 300806 8/3012007 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 222.02 COFFEE 168649 406373 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 222.02 300807 813012007 101977 ARCH WIRELESS 55.52 PAGER RENTAL 168461 06339611H 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 55.52 300808 813012007 120451 ARMSTRONG TORSETH SKOLD & RYDE 3,059.63 ART CENTER FEASIBILITY STUDY 168237 082207 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 3,059.63 300809 8/3012007 101954 AUGIE'S INC. 72.98 FOOD 168238 24407 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 72.98 300810 8130/2007 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 25.47 BATTERIES 168239 18- 184291 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 18.09 BATTERIES 168240 18- 184428 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 61.34 BATTERIES 168241 18- 184439 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 104.90 300811 8/3012007 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 1,190.90 168320 41790500 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING � 1 ' R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/29 /2007 8:12:26 Council Check Register Page - 3 8/30/2007 --8/30/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 99.95 168321 43350100 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 254.20 168322 41788700 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,559.70 168323 41849900 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 26.10 168324 43364500 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 50.00 168549 43377700 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 137.10 168549 43377700 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 378.20 168550 41844100 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 277.20 168551 41776400 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,973.35 300812 6/3012007 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 14.98 BINDERS 168462 OE- 125236 -1 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 57.85 LEGAL PADS 168650 W0465619-1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 72.83 300813 8/30/2007 101296 BERTRAND, MIKE 138.63 TV FOR CLUBHOUSE 168394 082107 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 138.63 300814 8/30/2007 100653 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS 423.10 ASPHALT 00005867 168395 10658 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 423.10 . 300815 8/30/2007 119679 BIXBY PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE 110.98 PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE 168505 7167 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 110.98 PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE 168506 7168 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 110.98 PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE 168507 7166 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 332.94 300816 8130/2007 119431 BLINK BONNIE 166.05 DINNER MEETING 168463 696 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 126.52 DINNER MEETING 168464 707 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 292.57 300817 8130/2007 105367 BOUND TREE MEDICAL LLC 1,021.48 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003853 168465 50530506 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,021.48 300818 8/30/2007 100669 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC. 63.25 GRAVELIROCK 00006133 168242 081507 1647.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK PATHS & HARD SURFACE 356.18 GRAVELIROCK 00006133 168242 081507 5422.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 419.43 R55CKREG LOG20000 1,071.85 CITY OF EDINA 68294 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING Council Check Register 168326 18290 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 8/30/2007 -8/30/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 300819 8/30/2007 3,881.15 120439 CADY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 303.53 CLEAN CARPETS 168396 15237A 5861.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS 298.20 CLEAN CARPETS 168397 15322A 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS 168328 601.73 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 300820 8/3012007 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET 300823 80.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 168619 082407 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 108.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 168619 082407 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 168398 3 -33529 188.00 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 300821 8/30/2007 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 8/29/2007 8:12:26 Page - 4 Business Unit VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY ART CENTER POTTERY ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,071.85 168325 68294 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,693.90 168326 18290 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 115.40 168327 18289 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,881.15 300822 8/30/2007 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 552.00 168328 48339 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 552.00 300823 8/3012007 100681 CATCO 483.36 MULTIFASTERS 00005161 168398 3 -33529 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 483.36 300824 8/30/2007 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 16.68 5596524 -8 168399 081607 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 73.58 5584304 -9 168400 8/16/2007 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 10.12 5584310 -6 168401 AUG162007 7413.6186 HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER 100.38 300825 8/30/2007 121160 CHASKA SCHOOL DISTRICT 189.00 PARTIAL REFUND 168244 082107 5301.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 189.00 300826 8/30/2007 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 630.00 168329 345120 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 630.00 300827 8130/2007 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 600.00 PLAN 9 MATERIALS 168402 082007 4205.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PANDEMIC FLU GRANT 600.00 w 812912007 8:12:26 Page- 5 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION MATERIALS /SUPPLIES S100 HALIFAX AV - 51ST TO 54TH GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL MATERIALS /SUPPLIES SIDEWALK- DONCASTER - VERNON A 242.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 300829 CITY OF EDINA 121449 CLAY COUNTY Council Check Register 182.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 8/30/2007 --8/30/2007 082107 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 300828 8130/2007 103040 CITY PAGES 300830 8/30/2007 80.66 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 168245 100211027 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 80.66 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 168245 100211027 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 80.68 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 168245 100211027 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 812912007 8:12:26 Page- 5 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION MATERIALS /SUPPLIES S100 HALIFAX AV - 51ST TO 54TH GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL MATERIALS /SUPPLIES SIDEWALK- DONCASTER - VERNON A 242.00 300829 8/3012007 121449 CLAY COUNTY 182.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 168403 082107 1000.2055 182.00 300830 8/30/2007 116304 CLAY, DON 372.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 168620 082407 5125.6103 372.00 300831 8130/2007 120433 COMCAST 270.38 8772156140408237 168466 080907 1470.6151 270.38 300632 8/30/2007 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 39,097.54 ASPHALT 00005899 168447 AUG152007 1314.6518 39,097.54 300833 8/30/2007 101395 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 2,787.12 CRS -2 168448 T7921300039865 1314.6519 2,787.12 300634 8/30/2007 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 731.90 CLAY 00009187 168404 INV000029404 5120.5510 731.90 300835 8/30/2007 102596 CROWN TROPHY 103.52 TROPHIES 00006291 168508 12903 5410.6122 103.52 300836 8/30/2007 105762 CYNOR, JAMIE T. 24.60 POSTAGE STAMPS 168467 082307 07100.1705.31 32.80 POSTAGE STAMPS 168467 082307 1260.6406 65.60 POSTAGE STAMPS 168467 082307 07092.1705.31 123.00 300837 8/30/2007 119157 DAHL, MARY 812912007 8:12:26 Page- 5 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL BLACKTOP STREET RENOVATION ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION MATERIALS /SUPPLIES S100 HALIFAX AV - 51ST TO 54TH GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL MATERIALS /SUPPLIES SIDEWALK- DONCASTER - VERNON A R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/30/2007 -8/30/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 120.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 168621 082407 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5421.5510 5630.6180 5842.5514 5842.5515 5842.5513 5822.5514 5822.5513 5862.5515 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD CONTRACTED REPAIRS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 120.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5421.5510 300838 8/3012007 COST OF GOODS SOLD 100710 DAVE'S DAIRY 511.99 DAIRY 168246 081307 511.99 300839 8/3012007 116713 DAVEY TREE EXPERT CO., THE 383.95 TREE INJECTION 00002350 168509 900391320 383.95 300840 8/30/2007 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 2,020.40 168330 423139 16.90 168331 423140 170.00 168332 423079 1,625.60 168333 423138 243.00 168334 423080 70.90 168552 423137 2,123.95 168553 423136 6,270.75 300841 8/30/2007 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 45.51 BAKERY 168247 253486 98.97 BAKERY 168248 253732 71.45 BAKERY 168249 253774 41.05 BAKERY 168510 253907 26.80 BAKERY 168511 253992 283.78 300842 8/30/2007 118375 DEPAUL LETTERING 112.00 POLOS 168651 2529 112.00 300843 8/30/2007 102934 DON HARSTAD CO INC 297.50 LOCK REPAIR 00007182 168250 123431 297.50 300844 8/3012007 121451 DOWN TO EARTH TECHNOLOGIES INC 335.00 SPRINKLER REPAIR 168468 58006 335.00 300845 8/301' , 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES 5421.5510 5630.6180 5842.5514 5842.5515 5842.5513 5822.5514 5822.5513 5862.5515 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD CONTRACTED REPAIRS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 6421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 1646.6103 05464.1705.30 8/29/2007 8:12:26 Page- 6 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GRILL CENTENNIAL LAKES YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL GRILL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -464 TODD PARK NHOOD R55CKREG LOG20000 34.45 CITY OF EDINA 168335 641960 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX Council Check Register 789.84 8/30/2007 -- 8/30/2007 641961 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 6.93- 1,675.68 CAUSTIC SODA, CHLORINE 168652 82701484 -07 5311.6545 CHEMICALS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,675.68 249.64 300846 8130/2007 168554 117435 DUNCAN, PATRICIA 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 102.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 168622 082407 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 102.00 300847 813012007 8/30/2007 100739 EAGLE WINE 120948 EDDINGTON'S 8/29/2007 8:12:26 Page - 7 Business Unit POOL OPERATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 34.45 168335 641960 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 789.84 168336 641961 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6.93- 168337 729433 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 249.64 168554 641957 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,067.00 300848 8/30/2007 120948 EDDINGTON'S 171.81 DINNER FOOD 168653 071107 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 171.81 300849 8/30/2007 106340 EDINA CAR WASH 46.86 CAR WASHES 168654 3033 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 46.86 300850 8130/2007 101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 198.33 FALL CATALOG AD 168655 6314 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 198.33 FALL CATALOG AD 188655 6314 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 198.34 FALL CATALOG AD 168655 6314 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 595.00 300851 8/30/2007 102340 EDMUNDS, LIZ 128.70 168555 877 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 128.70 300852 8/30/2007 116448 EGAN OIL COMPANY 20,952.20 GAS 168251 138186 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 20,952.20 300853 8/30/2007 106194 EMA INC. 5,980.00 SCADA IMPROVEMENTS 168656 5604 - 90012136 05465.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN WM465 SCADA UPGRADES 5,980.00 300854 8/3012007 105944 EMANUEL, LOU 139.50 SOFTBALL OFFICIAL 168405 082307 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/29/2007 8:12:26 Council Check Register Page - 8 8/30/2007 —8/30/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 139.50 300855 8/30/2007 104733 EMERGENCY MEDICAL PRODUCTS INC 740.35 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003868 168469 INV976381 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 740.35 300856 8/30/2007 100851 ENCOMM MIDWEST LLC 1,727.47 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 168657 082107 05467.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -467 WELL #10, TRTMT PLNT #3 1,727.47 360857 8/30/2007 117436 ERNST, MARCIA 50.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 168623 082407 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 50.00 300858 8/30/2007 100752 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. 692.25 STORM SEWER COVERS 00005906 168658 KK4246 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 1,762.58 STORM SEWER COVERS 00005906 168658 KK4246 5932.6536 CASTINGS GENERAL STORM SEWER 2,454.83 300859 8/30/2007 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 593.27 PADS, ROTORS 00005056 168406 6- 956156 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 593.27 300860 8/30/2007 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL 16.30 PHOTO FINISHING 00003532 168470 3532 -8/20 1470.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 16.30 300861 8/30/2007 102003 FASTSIGNS BLOOMINGTON 16.00 SIGN LETTERS 00002349 168512 190 -32177 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 16.00 300862 8/30/2007 101540 FINE GARDENING 69.95 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 168407 082107 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 69.95 300863 8_/30/2007 120329 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES INC 1,561.95 TURN -OUT GEAR 00003882 168471 5213 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,561.95 300864 8/3012007 121386 FLINT HILLS RESOURCES LP 4,416.08 CRS -2 168449 9122474 -0 1314.6519 ROAD OIL STREET RENOVATION 4,416.08 8129/2007 8:12:26 Page - 9 Business Unit SPECIAL ACTIVITIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 150.00 PERFORMANCE 9/6/07 168659 081707 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 300868 CITY OF —AA 103039 FREY, MICHAEL Council Check Register 2,515.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 168625 8/30/2007 --8/30/2007 5110.6103 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 300865 8130/2007 102015 FLOWERS OF EDINA 813012007 102419 GARDEN & ASSOCIATES INC 42.60 PARADE CENTERPIECE 168408 4128 1627.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 110.00 42.60 168660 57420 1400.6103 300866 8130/2007 121454 FOSSEY, CHRISTINE 96.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 168624 082407 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 96.00 300867 8/30/2007 LIFEGUARD UNIFORMS 100179 FRAGALE, ANNETTE 74952 5311.6201 8129/2007 8:12:26 Page - 9 Business Unit SPECIAL ACTIVITIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 150.00 PERFORMANCE 9/6/07 168659 081707 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 722.50 ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES PLANT #4 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST BUILDING MAINTENANCE 168556 93364 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 168557 93362 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 150.00 300868 8/30/2007 103039 FREY, MICHAEL 2,515.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 168625 082407 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,515.00 300869 813012007 102419 GARDEN & ASSOCIATES INC 110.00 INTERPRETER 168660 57420 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 110.00 300870 813012007 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 339.50 LIFEGUARD UNIFORMS 168409 74952 5311.6201 LAUNDRY 190.50- RETURNS 168410 74981 5311.6201 LAUNDRY 149.00 300871 8/30/2007 121445 GERNBACHER, STEVEN 185.00 SEASON TICKET REFUND 168252 081807 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS 185.00 300872 8/3012007 119771 GRAHAM PENN -CO CONSTRUCTION IN 14,766.64 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 11 168661 083107 05426.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 14,766.64 300873 8/30/2007 101103 GRAINGER 103.61 MEASURING TAPES 00005257 168253 9426216892 1646.6556 TOOLS 103.61 300874 8/30/2007 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 722.50 ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES PLANT #4 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST BUILDING MAINTENANCE 168556 93364 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 168557 93362 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 300875 8/3012007 118505 GRENIER, JOSH 170.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 170.00 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/30/2007 --8/3012007 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 168626 082407 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8/29/2007 8:12:26 Page - 10 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 300877 8/30/2007 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 314.51 168338 638458 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 111.09 168339 641963 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 699.30 168340 641855 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6,192.91 168341 641962 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,312.90 168342 640336 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 633.95 168343 . 641854 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,452.59 168344 641951 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 119.40 168345 641953 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 662.39 168346 641959 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 404.70 168347 641958 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 96.85- 168348 729827 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 89.10- 168349 729826 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 89.10- 168350 730372 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 72.00- 168351 730152 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 42.30- 168352 729834 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10,239.74 168558 641964 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 131.16 168559 641954 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 896.28 168560 641881 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,654.92 168561 641955 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 561.67 168562 638445 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .95 168563 641735 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2.85 168564 638193 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 146.39 168565 643754 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 110.34- 168566 729825 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 154.08- 168567 730308 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 28,883.93 300876 8/30/2007 100840 GUSTAFSON, KATHY 377.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 168627 082407 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 377.00 300879 8130/2007 101964 GUSTAVE A. LARSON CO. 36.11 FAN BLADE 00005446 168411 WAU0190786 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 36.11 300880 8130/" 106431 HALL, MARY R55CKREG LOG20000 _ CITY OF EDINA 8/29/2007 8:12:26 Council Check Register Page - 11 8/30/2007 -8/30/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit ' 150.00 PERFORMANCE 9/9107 168663 081707 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 300881 8130/2007 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 181.96 REGISTER PAPER 00007516 168412 255146 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 181.96 300882 8/30/2007 100797 HAWKINS INC. 1,985.76 HMO CHEMICALS 00005334 168664 1101621 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 3,970.08 HMO CHEMICALS 00005336 168665 1100469 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 5,955.84 300883 8/30/2007 116838 HAYES INSTRUMENT CO INC 216.94 HUB, TAPE, BRACKET 00004057 168472 518512 1260.6577 LUMBER ENGINEERING GENERAL 216.94 300884 813012007 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 351.20 WATER MAIN REPAIR PARTS 00005331 168689 5820963 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 351.20 300885 813012007 117186 HELGREN, ADAM 98.97 UNIFORM PURCHASE 168513 082107 5630.6201 LAUNDRY CENTENNIAL LAKES 98.97 300886 8/30/2007 102070 HENNEPIN COUNTY CHIEFS OF POLI 210.00 MEMBERSIP (3) 168666 082307 1400.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 210.00 300887 8/30/2007 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 25.00 TRANSACTION PROCESSING 168254 27077124 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 52.02 TRANSACTION PROCESSING 168254 27077124 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 1,671.54 RADIO ADMIN FEE 168473 27078013 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,748.56 300888 813012007 119559 HIGGINS, NANCY 180.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 168628 082407 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 180.00 300889 8130/2007 102484 HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MANUFACTURI 750.83 FIELD PAINT 00005734 168255 76631 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 750.83 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/29/2007 8:12:26 Council Check Register Page - 12 8130/2007 -8/30/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 300890 8/3012007 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,811.12 168568 428513 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,811.12 300891 813012007 100842 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 280.40 CAMERAS, ACCESSORIES 00004443 168413 001616978 -001 1495.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT INSPECTIONS 280.40 300892 8/30/2007 119094 HUMANA DENTAL 412.91 PREMIUM 168514 032587320 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 8,704.11 PREMIUM 168514 032587320 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 9,117.02 300893 8/30/2007 104822 HYDRO LOGIC 110.47 IRRIGATION PARTS 00005267 168256 0305828 -IN 1642.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIELD MAINTENANCE 110.47 300894 8/30/2007 121161 IDEARC MEDIA CORP 44.00 DIRECTORY ADVERTISING 168414 390012154081 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 44.00 300895 6/3012007 100698 IMAGE TECH SERVICES 62.88 20# BOND PAPER 00004059 168667 97879 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 62.88 300896 8/30/2007 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 90.27 IRRIGATION PARTS 00005249 168257 488576 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 93.55 CONNECTORS, VALVES 00005454 168415 489171 5915.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 183.82 300897 8/30/2007 116191 INSTY- PRINTS 141.38 FLYERS /POSTERS 168474 77763 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 141.38 300898 8/30/2007 119808 INTEGRA TELECOM 274.66 PHONEIDATA 168416 3127348 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 408.06 PHONES 168475 3128886 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 682.72 300899 8/30/2007 104572 INVISIBLE FENCE CO. OF MN 289.04 FENCE REPAIR4701 WILFORD WAN00001689 168476 ORDER #101125 05463.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM463 SOUTHDALE 1 ST 289.04 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/29/2007 8:12:26 Council Check Register Page - 13 8/3012007 - 8/30/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier ! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 300900 8/3012007 118322 ITL PATCH COMPANY INC. 1,150.04 EMBLEMS/BADGES 168668 28580 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,150.04 300901 8/3012007 121450 IVERSON, DARREN 100.00 SPRINKLER REPAIR 168477 065074 05463.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM-463 SOUTHDALE 1ST 100.00 300902 8/30/2007 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 529.39 HOLDING TANK SERVICE 168478 16647 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 529.39 300903 8/30/2007 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 1,640.27 168353 1101285 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 326.10 168515 874405 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 228.00 168516 1104845 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 6,174.72 168569 1101292 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,023.75 168570 1101287 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 42.00 168571 1003148 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,665.75 168572 1101284 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 14,100.59 300905 8/3012007 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1,635.00 168354 1296010 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,367.44 168355 1304591 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 8,085.30 168356 1304590 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 295.24 168357 1301852 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6.25- 168358 351284 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 11.72- 168359 351283 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 35.07 168573 1304592 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,405.28 168574 1307959 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 101.08 168575 1307955 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 499.91 168576 1307960 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 63.07 168577 1308455 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 139.71 168578 1307945 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 894.57 168579 1307947 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 97.99 168580 1307948 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,376.56 168581 1307946 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,305.28 168582 1307951 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,562.75 168583 1307952 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 34.07 168584 1307953 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/29/2007 8:12:26 Council Check Register Page - 14 8/30/2007 8/30/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,429.99 168585 1307954 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.08 168586 1307949 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,841.04 168587 1307950 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 73.03 168588 1307957 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 470.11 168589 1307956 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,946.94 168590 1307961 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 31 ,642.54 300906 8/30/2007 103654 JOHNSON, DENISE 285.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 168629 082407 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 285.00 300907 8/30/2007 111018 KEEPRS INC. 1,806.30 UNIFORMS 168669 073107 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,806.30 300908 8130/2007 105990 KELLY GREEN IRRIGATION INC. 186.43 SPRINKLER REPAIR 168479 45081 05464.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM-464 TODD PARK NHOOD 612.15 SPRINKLER REPAIR 168480 45135 05464.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM-464 TODD PARK NHOOD 349.25 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00001686 168481 45078 05463.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WMA63 SOUTHDALE 1ST 1,147.83 300909 8/30/2007 106094 KOUTSKY, DEAN 576.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 168630 082407 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 576.00 300910 8130/2007 118515 KRIEGER, PATRICIA 95.00 CLASS REFUND 168417 081507 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 95.00 300911 8/3012007 118660 LAKES AREA HOME IMPROVEMENT SE 250.00 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00001619 168482 2269 05463.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -463 SOUTHDALE 1ST 250.00 300912 8/30/2007 121275 LAUFENBURGER, KATHERINE 552.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 168631 082407 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 552.00 300913 8/30/2007 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 120.40 DRILLS 00005458 168258 5919215 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 314.42 BOLTS 00005457 168259 5924344 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 434.82 l R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF ".,..JA 8/29/2UU7 8:12:26 Council Check Register Page - 15 8/3012007 -8/30/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 300914 8130/2007 121459 LENOVO INC. 3,380.00 PC PARTS 00003171 168690 6138191 4608.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE COMPUTER SYSTEM 3,380.00 300915 8130/2007 100855 LESCO INC. 176.00 GRASS SEED 168670 6BID850A 05464.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES WM-464 TODD PARK NHOOD 176.00 300916 8/30/2007 121095 LESKEE, DOUG 134.35 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 168483 082307 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 134.35 300917 8/30/2007 121078 LMS IRRIGATION INC. 807.06 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00001688 168484 20072230 05463.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM-463 SOUTHDALE 1ST 807.06 300918 8/30/2007 100858 LOGIS 27.37 168260 28234128211 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING GENERAL (BILLING) 216.00 168260 28234/28211 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 240.00 168260 28234/28211 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 388.55 168260 28234/28211 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,743.99 168260 28234/28211 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 60.60 168261 28301/28330 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 99.95 168261 28301/28330 2210.6160 DATA PROCESSING COMMUNICATIONS 302.46 168261 28301128330 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 376.00 168261 28301/28330 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 576.00 168261 28301/28330 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,028.64 168261 28301/28330 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 1,736.00 168261 28301/28330 46001.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIBER OPTIC CABLING 14.38 168262 28409/28443 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING GENERAL (BILLING) 99.95 168262 28409/28443 2210.6160 DATA PROCESSING COMMUNICATIONS 508.77 168262 28409/28443 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 576.00 168262 28409/28443 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 624.00 168262 28409/28443 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 949.95 168262 28409/28443 46001.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIBER OPTIC CABLING 5,711.55 168262 28409/28443 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 15,280.16 300919 8/30/2007 121455 LOHANI, MINISHA 60.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 168632 082407 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 60.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 300920 8130/2007 1,644.75 101792 LUBE -TECH 168360 227850 2,759.94 BULK OIL -8/30/2007 168361 326.40 GREASE Inv No Account No 163.20 GREASE 00001960 168418 96.27- CREDIT LUBRICANTS 00001031 3,153.27 1432082 300921 8/30/2007 00005172 121241 LUND, ANGELA RENEE 1434798 1553.6584 728.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 168421 481954 728.00 LUBRICANTS 300922 8/30/2007 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 230141 R2R_4R 168633 082407 168591 20132 168592 18594 300923 8/3012007 CITY OF EDINA 1,644.75 Council Check Register 168360 227850 8130/2007 -8/30/2007 168361 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 227557 00001960 168418 1431955 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS 00001031 168419 1432082 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS 00005172 168420 1434798 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS 00005039 168421 481954 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS 168633 082407 168591 20132 168592 18594 300923 8/3012007 100868 MARK VII SALES 1,644.75 168360 227850 1,560.20 168361 225194 55.35 168362 227557 2,848.26 168363 227556 4,183.10 168364 228359 36.90 168365 228360 1,031.10 168593 229925 4,614.79 168594 230141 15,974.45 300924 8/30/2007 120924 MASTER MECHANICAL INC. 57,692.63 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 5 168671 083107 109,143.86 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 168672 AUG31 166,836.49 300925 813012007 121452 MATREKS 237.23 SOT BROCHURES 168486 07 -1184 237.23 300926 8/30/2007 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 300.60 COPY ROOM PHONE 168487 37838 666.08 PHONE CHANGES 168487 37838 170.00 MISC PROGRAMMING 168488 38632 232.50 PHONE REPAIRS 168489 38226 5110.6103 5862.5515 5862.5515 5862.5514 5862.5514 5862.5515 5862.5514 5842.5514 5842.5515 5822.5514 5842.5514 10036.1705.30 10036.1705.30 1470.6406 1120.6710 1550.6188 1550.6188 1550.6188 8129/2007 8:12:26 Page - 16 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING LS36 LIFT STATION #6 LS36 LIFT STATION #6 FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICE' =RA- R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF WINA 8129/2007 8:12:26 Council Check Register Page - 17 8/30/2007 -8/30/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 287.17 PHONE 168673 38681 1260.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ENGINEERING GENERAL 232.50 168674 38527 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 308.47 168674 38527 1553.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,197.32 300927 8/30/2007 103189 MEDICA 1,394.61 PREMIUM 168517 C0010791916 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 9,100.60 PREMIUM 168517 C0010791916 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 10,495.21 300928 8/30/2007 103189 MEDICA 9,647.08 PREMIUM 168518 C0010790201 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 71,590.20 PREMIUM 168518 C0010790201 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 81,237.28 300929 8/30/2007 103189 MEDICA 4,346.40 PREMIUM 168519 C0010791592 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 56,257.25 PREMIUM 168519 C0010791592 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 60,603.65 300930 8/30/2007 103169 MEDICA 18,158.32 PREMIUM 168520 C0010789532 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 18,158.32 300931 8/30/2007 113023 MEGGITT DEFENSE SYSTEMS CASWEL 8,040.75 SHOOTING RANGE EQUIPMENT 168422 068415 7401.8020 DONATIONS PSTF REVENUE 8,040.75 300932 8/30/2007 101483 MENARDS 89.52 NAILS, LUMBER 00005511 168263 59401 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 12.82 PLUMBING PARTS 00005269 168264 58025 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 211.93 DEHUMIDIFIER 00005480 168265 59623 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 9.15 REPAIR FLANGES 00005489 168266 59134 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 72.29 BUILDING MATERIALS 00005262 168267 57634 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 23.40 PAINT BASE 00006285 168521 60551 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 42.58 OIL STAIN 00006364 168522 60272 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 461.69 300933 8/30/2007 101987 MENARDS 19.92 IRRIGATION PARTS 00002341 168523 20621 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 17.66 HOSE PARTS 00002341 168524 20588 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 5.31 INFRA -RED LAMP 00005270 168526 20815 5320.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL CONCESSIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/29/2007 8:12:26 Council Check Register Page - 18 8/30/2007 --8/30/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 54.64 ALGAECIDE, GLOVES 00002333 168675 18778 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 97.53 300934 8/30/2007 102281 MENARDS 25.35 TRAILER HITCH 00005455 168268 64244 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 25.35 300935 8/30/2007 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 61.77 DISPENSERS 00005258 168269 72407 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 61.77 300936 8/30/2007- 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 106.39 FIELD PAINT 00005264 168270 101718 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 106.39 300937 8130/2007 100885 METRO SALES INC ' 24,437.65 NEW COPIERS 00003006 168676 83237B 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,394.00 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 168677 261467 1400.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 25,831.65 300938 8/30/2007 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 273.19 ASPHALT 00005909 168450 88764MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 437.86 ASPHALT 00005909 168451 88546MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 369.28 ASPHALT 00005909 168452 86973MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,080.33 300939 813012007 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,170.00 WATER MAIN REPAIR 00005335 168678 33021 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,170.00 300940 8/30/2007 101638 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 22,283.00 CONNECTION FEE 168272 1270011 5915.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT 22,283.00 300941 8/30/2007 102222 MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSP 5.00 MANUALS 168497 082407 1260.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ENGINEERING GENERAL 5.00 300942 8/30/2007 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 431.33 CSS -1 H ASPHALT EMULSION 168453 55933 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 668.82 CRS -2 168454 56026 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 690.12 CSS -1H ASPHALT EMULSION 168455 56048 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTEN' - 8/2912007 8:12:26 Page - 19 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GOLF ADMINISTRATION 195.00 RECERTIFICATION FEES 168485 082307 R55CKREG LOG20000 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY OF EDINA 195.00 Council Check Register 300946 8130/2007 8/30/2007 -8/30/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 135.00 RENTAL REFUND. 1,790.27 082307 1600.4722.09 ROSLAND RENTAL 300943 8/30/2007 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 39.00 SWIVEL 00003881 168490 0074043 -IN 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 120745 MORTON BUILDINGS INC. 39.00 300944 8130/2007 117106 MJL IMPRESSIONS ADDITIONAL ELECTRICAL WORK 168423 073107 7411.6710 168.00 FRAMING 00006286 168271 6881 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,030.00 168.00 300945 813012007 813012007 101917 MN FIRE SERVICE CERTIFICATION 102395 MOSE, WILLIAM 8/2912007 8:12:26 Page - 19 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GOLF ADMINISTRATION 195.00 RECERTIFICATION FEES 168485 082307 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 195.00 300946 8130/2007 121457 MOORE, CAROL 135.00 RENTAL REFUND. 168679 082307 1600.4722.09 ROSLAND RENTAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 135.00 300947 8/30/2007 120745 MORTON BUILDINGS INC. 1,030.00 ADDITIONAL ELECTRICAL WORK 168423 073107 7411.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PSTF OCCUPANCY 1,030.00 300948 813012007 102395 MOSE, WILLIAM 325.50 SOFTBALL OFFICIAL 168424 082307 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 325.50 300949 8130/2007 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 128.27 CAPSCREWS, WASHERS 00005663 168425 590845 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 209.04 IRRIGATION PARTS 00002337 168527 590211 -00 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 363.41 SOLENOID & MASTER STATION 00002327 168528 588364 -00 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 700.72 300950 8130/2007 114345 NAIOP 65.00 SEMINAR 168273 082107 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 65.00 300951 8/3012007 106334. NELSON, PEGGY 480.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 168634 082407 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 480.00 300952 8/30/2007 108678 NEWMECH COMPANIES INC. 292.50 HVAC REPAIR 168426 763467 7412.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF RANGE R55CKREG LOG20000 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION CITY OF EDINA TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS Council Check Register STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 8/30/2007 -- 8/30/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 292.50 FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION TELEPHONE 300953 8/30/2007 TELEPHONE 104672 NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS 13.83 168691 873184124 -056 1240.6188 27.49 168691 873184124 -056 1120.6188 36.77 168691 873184124 -056 4090.6188 57.35 168691 873184124 -056 1553.6188 75.57 168691 873184124 -056 1554.6230 103.57 168691 873184124 -056 1322.6188 104.24 168691 873184124 -056 2210.6188 143.20 168691 873184124 -056 1495.6188 180.82 168691 873184124 -056 1260.6188 192.96 168691 873184124 -056 1301.6188 245.42 168691 873184124 -056 5620.6230 275.95 168691 873184124 -056 1640.6188 308.17 168691 873184124 -056 1470.6188 520.69 168691 873184124 -056 5311.6188 714.16 168691 873184124 -056 5910.6188 820.43 168691 873184124 -056 1400.6188 3,820.62 300954 8/30/2007 101958 NICOL, JANET 468.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 168635 082407 5125.6103 468.00 300955 8130/2007. 121453 NORTHWAY IRRIGATION 805.01 SPRINKLER REPAIR 168491 44396 05463.1705.30 292.98 SPRINKLER REPAIR 168492 44395 05463.1705.30 1,097.99 8/2912007 8:12:26 Page- 20 Subledger Account Description Business Unit TELEPHONE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE STREET REVOLVING TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM-463 SOUTHDALE 1ST CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM-463 SOUTHDALE 1ST 300956 8/30/2007 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 167.46 TUBE PAINT, ERASERS, OILS 00009204 168427 34763500 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 13.32 PENS 00009204 168428 34682901 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 180.78 300957 813012007 100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO. 1,436.58 TIRES 00005364 168429 NW- 108481 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 1,424.58 TIRES 00005057 168430 . NW- 108353 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 1,532.69 TIRES 00005088 168431 NW- 108302 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 4,393.85 300958 81301' 121446 OAK GROVE ELEMENTARY ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EUINA 8/29 /2007 8:12:26 Council Check Register Page - 21 8/30/2007 -8/30/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 54.00 PARTIAL REFUND 168432 082207 5301.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 54.00 ' 300959 8/3012007 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 404.88 OFFICE SUPPLIES 168529 398004400 -001 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 404.88 300960 8130/2007 102712 OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOG 438.03 168274 W07070600 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 20.27 ARNESON 168275 W07070593 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 40.54 GREENHOUSE 168275 W07070593 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 81.08 168275 W07070593 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 101.35 CARD ACCESS -PARKS 168275 W07070593 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 101.35 168275 W07070593 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 101.41 168275 W07070593 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 101.44 HISTORICAL 168275 W07070593 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 121.75 168275 W07070593 1481.6188 TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION 127.62 168275 W07070593 5210.6188 TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM 131.10 168275 W07070593 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 131.33 168275 W07070593 5311.6188 TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION 162.57 168275 W07070593 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 202.70 168275 W07070593 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 815.38 168275 W07070593 5610.6188 TELEPHONE ED ADMINISTRATION 2,677.92 300961 8/30/2007 120860 OLSSON ASSOCIATES 4,000.00 ENGINEERING SERVICES 168276 102911 47051.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GARDEN PARK PATHWAY 4,000.00 300962 8130/2007 101484 OSWALD HOSE & ADAPTERS 205.55 HOSE FOR WATER TANKER 00005493 168277 103786 1644.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TREES & MAINTENANCE 205.55 300963 8/30/2007 102440 PASS, GRACE 280.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 168636 082407 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY 375.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 168636 082407 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 655.00 300964 8/30/2007 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 2,437.25 168366 8155929 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 55.90 168367 8155932 -IN 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,523.50 168368 8155935 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/29/2007 8:12:26 Council Check Register Page - 22 813012007 -8/30/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 283.00- 168369 8154885 -CM 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 84.00- 168370 8154880 -CM 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,258.78 168595 8155933 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,908.43 300965 8/3012007 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 1,101.06 168530 13046777 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 338.75 168531 13280597 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 701.00 168532 13280592 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 2,140.81 300966 8130/2007 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 503.07 168371 2500638 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 349.60 168372 2465763 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 58.35 168373 2489794 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,130.60 168596 2503247 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 113.06 168597 2503237 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 95.63 168598 2503238 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,252.74 168599 2503234 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 483.68 168600 2503243 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,505.92 168601 2503239 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 37.08 168602 2503240 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,280.89 168603 2503241 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 28.57 168604 2503242 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,367.84 168605 2503246 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 49.08 168606 2503245 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,668.16 168607 2503244 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 11,924.27 300967 8/30/2007 120959 PLOURDE PROPERTIES LLC 5,070.00 LEASE PAYMENT #6 168278 082207 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 5,070.00 300968 8/30/2007 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 82.00 POSTAGE STAMPS 168637 082407 5110.6803 CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 82.00 300969 8/30/2007 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 280.70 168608 641956 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 280.70 300970 8/30/' 100971 QUALITY WINE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/29/2007 8:12:26 Council Check Register Page - 23 8130/2007 --8/30/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 138.10 168374 897770 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 203.10 168375 897372 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 485.75 168376 898424 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,721.11 168377 898914 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 562.24 168378 899171 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,063.63 168379 899016 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,466.65 168380 898915 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 85.15 168381 899118 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,982.20 168382 899172 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 185.73 168383 899017 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 947.81 168384 898916 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 799.05 168385 899173 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 19.51- 168386 894936 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,024.81 168609 899019 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 15,645.82 300971 813012007 101965 QWEST 112.68 952 920 -8166 168692 8166 -8/07 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 112.68 300972 8/30/2007 112562 RADIO SHACK CORPORATION 1,735.87 REPLACE LOBBY T.V.S 00008087 168693 193091 5511.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 80.16 MUSIC SUPPLIES 00008086 168694 193080 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 1,816.03 300973 8/30/2007 101111 REED BUSINESS INFORMATION 356.80 AD FOR BID 168279 3704464 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 356.80 300974 8/3012007 102794 REHRIG PACIFIC COMPANY 3,791.40 RECYCLING BINS 00004055 168280 KE63937 5952.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RECYCLING 3,791.40 300975 8130/2007 121447 ROLES, NANCY 80.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 168433 082207 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 80.00 300976 8/30/2007 100982 ROTO - ROOTER 219.00 FLOOR DRAIN CLEANING 168533 04814150894 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 219.00 300977 8/30/2007 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/30/2007 8/30/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 33.02 BAKERY 168534 192183 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD PAINT 8/29/2007 8:12:26 Page - 24 Business Unit GRILL GOLF ADMINISTRATION GRILL CENTENNIAL LAKES CONFERENCES 8; SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 33.02 300978 8/30/2007 101622 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 84.84 101 - 25373069350 00006290 168535 CLOCKS 5410.6406 84.84 300979 813012007 100305 SARA LEE FOOD SERVICES 528.00 COFFEE 168536 300581320630 5421.5510 528.00 300980 813012007 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 40.49 LUMBER 00002331 168680 40517345 5630.6532 40.49 300981 8/3012007 106506 SCHMIT TOWING INC. 375.00 CARS FOR TRAINING 168493 7 /31 /07STMT 1470.6104 375.00 300982 813012007 121456 SCHROEDER, DAVID 80.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 168638 082407 5110.6103 80.00 300983 8130/2007 121444 SECRETARY OF STATE 40.00 NOTARY APPLICATION 168281 082107 1120.6103 40.00 300984 8130/2007 120944 SHAUGNHESSY, DALTON 58.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 168639 082407 5112.6103 58.00 300985 813012007 101000 SIR SPEEDY 91.86 BUSINESS CARDS 168437 54853 1550.6406 91.86 300986 8/3012007 110977 SOW, ADAMA 908.00 CLEANING SERVICES 168640 082407 5111.6103 2,088.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 168640 082407 5110.6103 2,996.00 300987 8130/2007 116682 SPECIALTY WINES & BEVERAGES 495.00 168387 16988 5842.5513 GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD PAINT 8/29/2007 8:12:26 Page - 24 Business Unit GRILL GOLF ADMINISTRATION GRILL CENTENNIAL LAKES CONFERENCES 8; SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF -NA 8/2912u07 8:12:26 Council Check Register Page - 25 8130/2007 --8/30/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 972.00 168388 16679 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,467.00 300988 813012007 103082 SPRINKLER SYSTEMS INC. 333.37 SPRINKLER REPAIR -TIM CALAHAN 00001674 168494 9741 05463.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -463 SOUTHDALE 1ST 333.37 300989 8/3012007 116856 SPRINT 54.79 DATA CARD 168681 08152007 5910.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) 54.79 300990 8/3012007 101004 SPS COMPANIES 29.19 MOP SINK 00005470 168282 S1702480.001 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 119.14 PLUMBING PARTS 00005477 168283 S1702788.001 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 74.80 TOOLS 00005481 168284 S1703325.001 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 223.13 300991 8130/2007 106452 STONE, HOLLY 480.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 168641 082407 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 480.00 300992 8/30/2007 101015 STREICHERS 186.38 SQUAD LABOR 168682 1452688 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 312.03 PRINTER FOR SQUAD 168695 1448432 4608.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE COMPUTER SYSTEM 498.41 300993 8/3012007 105874 SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE INC. 117.38 TIRES 00005164 168438 10072343 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 117.38 TIRES 00005061 168439 10072490 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 234.76 300994 813012007 102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. 260.71 SPEED CARTS 168537 154527 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 23.75 BAG REPAIR 168538 160203 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 284.46 300995 8/3012007 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 884.20 HELP WANTED AD 168440 1013370 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 495.00 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS AD 00016102 168696 1015909 4204.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HEALTH ALERT NETWORK 1,379.20 300996 8/30/2007 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/2912007 8:12:26 Council Check Register Page - 26 8/30/2007 -8130/2007 Check # Dale Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subiedger Account Description Business Unit 360.00 168389 662029 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 360.00 300997 8/3012007 119864 SYSCO MINNESOTA 419.51 CONCESSION PRODUCT 168285 708181549 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 419.51 300998 8/3012007 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 37.00 BEER LINE CLEANING 168286 266800 5421.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GRILL 37.00 300999 8/3012007 120992 TEHAMA 536.73 MERCHANDISE 168287 270313 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 536.73 301000 8130/2007 113549 TENNIS WEST 275.00 REPAIR FENCE AT SKATE PARK 00005483 168288 07 -551 1647.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS PATHS & HARD SURFACE 275.00 301001 8/3012007 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 181.67 BACL UP LIGHTS 00005167 168434 24581 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 181.67 301002 813012007 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 543.75 168289 459215 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 260.00 168290 28676 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 229.00 168539 28714 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 50.80 168610 459611 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,723.30 168611 459612 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,806.85 301003 8/30/2007 104347 TIERNEY BROTHERS INC. 1,063.94 PROJECTORS 00004447 168435 517021 -1 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 2,127.87 PROJECTORS 00004447 168435 517021 -1 1554.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 3,191.81 301004 8130/2007 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 500.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 168291 2007 -5806 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 500.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 168291 2007 -5806 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 500.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 168291 2007 -5806 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,500.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 699.75 NSF COLLECTIONS 168498 CITY OF _,iNA 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 699.75 Council Check Register 301009 8/30/2007 8/30/2007 --8/30/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 301005 8/30/2007 FIELD MAINTENANCE 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 207.68 GRASS SEED 00005487 168294 17391 1642.6547 SEED 58.58 WELDING SUPPLIES 168540 181161 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 58.58 301010 8/30/2007 100569 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 301006 8/30/2007 101693 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS 105.00 PESTICIDE LICENSE -ADAM HELGREN 168541 082107 5610.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 148.04 PLASTIC SHELF TAGS 168292 21681 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 148.04 SHELF LABELS 168683 21687 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 296.08 205.00 MN WATER RESOURCES CONFERENCE 168684 082407 301007 8/30/2007 ENGINEERING GENERAL 101374 TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE 205.00 500.00 REPAIR FENCE 00005387 168436 20394 5923.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 500.00 6.44 SHIPPING FEE 168685 301008 8/30/2007 GENERAL SUPPLIES 101633 TRANSWORLD SYSTEMS INC. 16.29 SHIPPING FEE 168686 8 /29r /u07 8:12:26 Page - 27 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING COLLECTION SYSTEMS 699.75 NSF COLLECTIONS 168498 15291 -2007 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 699.75 301009 8/30/2007 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 332.81 FERTILIZER 00005519 168293 17395 1642.6540 FERTILIZER FIELD MAINTENANCE 207.68 GRASS SEED 00005487 168294 17391 1642.6547 SEED FIELD MAINTENANCE 540.49 301010 8/30/2007 100569 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 105.00 PESTICIDE LICENSE -ADAM HELGREN 168541 082107 5610.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ED ADMINISTRATION 105.00 301011 8/3012007 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 205.00 MN WATER RESOURCES CONFERENCE 168684 082407 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL 205.00 301012 8/30/2007 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 6.44 SHIPPING FEE 168685 081507 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 16.29 SHIPPING FEE 168686 080907 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 10.32 SHIPPING FEE 00003016 168687 081207 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 9.13 SHIPPING FEE 00004445 168688 081007 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 42.18 301013 8/30/2007 100050 USPS - HASLER 5,000.00 ACCT #75983 168456 082307 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5,000.00 301014 8/30/2007 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/29/2007 8:12:26 Council Check Register Page - 28 8/30/2007 -8/30/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 10,330.37 EMERG STORM SEWER REPAIR 00005327 168295 12438 5932.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL STORM SEWER 10,330.37 301015 8/30/2007 120620 VALLONE, AMANDA 450.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 168642 082407 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 450.00 301016 813012007 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 259.34 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00005482 168296 049039 -00 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 306.19 BAGS 168297 049102 -00 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 44.55 FORKS 00007513 168298 049105 -00 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 627.33 BAGS 00007513 168298 049105 -00 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 211.45 BAGS, TOWELS 00007512 168441 049101 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 101.29 LIDS 00006347 168542 048703 -00 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL' 1,550.15 301017 8/30/2007 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 164.10 SOLENOID & BATTERY 00002351 168543 32092 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 164.10 301018 8/3012007 120027 WARDLAW, ANITA L. 300.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 168643 082407 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 300.00 301019 8/30/2007 100183 WASHINGTON COUNTY 102.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 168442 082107 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 102.00 301020 8130/2007 116516 WELDON, KEN 206.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 168644 082407 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 206.00 301021 8/30/2007 118274 WEST METRO IRRIGATION INC. 230.00 SPRINKLER REPAIR -DAVE FISHER 00001677 168495 4955 05463.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM 463 SOUTHDALE 1ST 230.00 301022 8130/2007 121448 WILSON, KEVIN 58.50 WATERBROOM ATTACHMENT 168443 082207 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 58.50 301023 8130/2007 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 470.40 168390 173331 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R56CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 50TH ST SELLING 168614 557.75 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,028.15 202012 301024 8/30/2007 YORK SELLING 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 202013 5862.5513 817.39 VERNON SELLING 168617 202011 98.16 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 168618 1,731.85 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 473.48 915.88 83.78- 3,952.98 301025 8/30/2007 105740 WSB 8 ASSOCIATES INC. 551.50 TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE 551.50 301026 8130/2007 101726 XCEL ENERGY 38.36 51- 5276505 -8 14,589.31 51- 6644819 -9 14,627.67 301027 8/3012007 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 664.00 664.00 301028 8/30/2007 101091 ZIEGLER INC 8.35 RINGS, SEALS 8.35 812,838.80 Grand Total CITY G. AA 8/�. 8:12:26 Council Check Register Page - 29 8/30/2007 —8/30/2007 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 168612 173230 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 168613 202009 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 168614 202010 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 168615 202012 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 168616 202013 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 168617 202011 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 168618 30264 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 168496 1- FEB212007 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 168299 121636705 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 168697 122821618 5620.6185 LIGHT & POWER EDINBOROUGH PARK 168391 1360 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 00005182 168444 PC001013777 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 812,838.80 Total Payments 812,838.80 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 8/30/2007 - 8/30/2007 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 335,536.48 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 438.49 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 17,134.95 05100 ART CENTER FUND 14,268.26 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 127.62 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 3,461.63 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 7,735.85 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 2,008.92 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 18,654.74 05800 LIQUOR FUND 159,679.09 05900 UTILITY FUND 227,837.50 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 12,360.11 05950 RECYCLING FUND 3,791.40 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 9,803.76 Report Totals 812,838.80 We Conf ffn to the best of arbowledge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing Poll es s d 8/29/2007 8:14:14 Page - 1 tiM REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # VIII.B. From: John Wallin Consent ❑ Finance Director Information Only ❑ Date: September 4, 2007 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Set Maximum Tax Levies ❑ Motion Action ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 2007 -84 setting the maximum proposed 2008 tax levies of $20,314,404 for the General Fund, $1,040,186 for the debt service of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority Public Project Revenue Bonds Series 2002 (year 7 of City Hall debt service levy), $200,000 for the debt service of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority Public Project Revenue Bonds Series 2005A (year 3 of Gymnasium debt service levy) and using $185,794 of the surplus of the Gymnasium construction bond proceeds, and $455,641 for the debt service of the Capital Improvement Plan bonds Series 2007A (year 1 of Fire Station debt service levy). The total market value based referendum levy would be set at $595,438. Information /Background: Total of the five levies would increase by $1,075,141 or 4.99 %. The preliminary General Fund expenditure budget is $28,654,642. The preliminary expenditure budget including all debt levies is $31,131,701. The referendum levy was set in 1996 when the GO Park and Recreation bonds Series 1996B were issued and reset when the remaining bonds were refunded by GO Park and Recreation Refunding Bonds, Series 2005A. As a function of the bond issuance all remaining levies were set by law at 105% of the corresponding annual debt service payments. The debt service fund is now sufficient to cover any foreseeable tax shortages and I would recommend canceling the portion of the 2008 levy in excess of the annual debt service payment. Future referendum levies remain at the 105% level and would require canceling a portion of the levy on the annual basis depending on the amount needed to maintain a sufficient debt service fund. Lj RESOLUTION NO. 2007-91 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE PROPOSED BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF EDINA FOR YEAR 2008, AND ESTABLISHING THE PROPOSED TAX LEVY PAYABLE IN 2008 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: City Of Edina Section 1: The Budget for the City of Edina for calendar year 2008, is hereby proposed as follows: TOTAL GENERAL FUND $ 28,654,642 DEBT SERVICE OF THE HRA PUBLIC PROJECGT BONDS - SERIES 2002 $ 1,040,186 DEBT SERVICE OF THE HRA PUBLIC PROJECGT BONDS - SERIES 2005A $ 385,794 DEBT SERVICE OF CIP PLAN BONDS - SERIES 2007A $ 455,641 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ 30,536,263 Section 2: Estimated receipts other than General Tax Levy are hereby proposed as follows: TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS $ 8,526,032 Section 3. That there is .proposed to be levied upon all taxable real and personal property in the City of Edina, a tax rate sufficient to produce the amount as follows: FOR GENERAL FUND $ 20,314,404 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF HRA PUBLIC PROJECT BONDS - SERIES 2002 $ 1,040,186 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF HRA PUBLIC PROJECT BONDS - SERIES 2005A $ 200,000 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF CIP PLAN BONDS - SERIES 2007A $ 455,641 TOTAL LEVY $ 22,010,231 Section 6. That there is proposed to be levied upon.all taxable real and personal property in the City of Edina, a tax rate sufficient to produce the amount below for the debt levy of the market value based referendum levy and cancelling the portion of the levy not required to produce the amount as follows: GO PARK AND RECREATION BONDS SERIES 1996A/2005A $ 595,438 Approved this 41h day of September 2007. Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) SS CITY OF EDINA James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of . 20_. City Clerk City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 o1 1e REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # VIH.C. From: John Wallin Consent ❑ Finance Director Information Only ❑ Date: September 4, 2007 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Subject: Truth in Taxation Hearing Action ® Motion Dates ❑ Resolution F-1. Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Attached is a calendar showing the dates that are available to hold the City's Truth in Taxation hearings. The dates referencing "initial" are not available for the initial Truth in Taxation hearing as they conflict with other Truth in Taxation hearings. I recommend that the City Council set Monday, December 3 at 5:00 p.m. for the Truth in Taxation initial hearing; Monday, December 10, at 5:00 p.m. for the continuation hearing; and Tuesday, December 18, at 7:00 p.m. for the budget adoption hearing. Info /Background: Unless exempted, cities are required to hold Truth in Taxation Hearings on their proposed total budgets and proposed property tax levies for the taxes payable year 2008 from November 29 through December 20, 2007. The City Council needs to set the initial and continuation hearing dates now. The adoption hearing can be set anytime between now and the close of the Truth in Taxation hearing(s). The County, school districts and the metropolitan special taxing districts have chosen their initial and continuation hearings. The Legislature has set aside the first two Mondays in December for the use of the cities. We can use those dates or select other dates that do not conflict as listed on the attached calendar. The dates on the attached calendar referencing "Initial" are not available for the initial Truth in Taxation hearing as they conflict with other Truth in Taxation hearings. The continuation hearing may conflict with other jurisdictions continuation hearings if the City deems it necessary. �r � 1 Initial Public Hearing The official adoption of the final levy and budget cannot occur at this hearing, a subsequent hearing for adoption must be held. If the City does not hold a continuation hearing for public comment, the time and date of the levy and budget adoption hearing must be announced during the initial hearing. When a Truth in Taxation hearing is held on the same night as a regular Council meeting, the Truth in Taxation hearing would be convened, and adjourned prior to conducting the business of the regular Council meeting. The City Council may, at their option, conduct a more joint Truth in Taxation public hearing by including a_ board member from the County or the School Districts. Cities can elect to hold a joint hearing by adopting a resolution, and by notifying the other taxing authorities and requesting that a member of the other body attend the joint hearing. The City Council may also invite each state senator and representative who represents the City to attend the joint hearing. Continuation Hearing If the City continues the Truth in Taxation discussion, the time and date of the continuation hearing must be announced at the initial hearing. The hearing date must be at least 5 business days but no more than 14 business days after the initial public hearing, but in no case later than December 20, 2007. The City may adopt its final levy and budget at a hearing immediately following the continuation hearing. Lew and Budget Adoption Hearing The hearing must be held separately from the official Truth in Taxation hearing(s). The date for this hearing does not have to be scheduled through the County Auditor but must be announced at the conclusion of the initial hearing, or the continuation hearing, if one is held. This hearing must be at least one day after the initial hearing if a continuation hearing is not needed. If a continuation hearing is held, the adoption hearing can be held immediately following the continuation hearing, or else the City Council must announce the date, time and place for the budget adoption hearing prior to the adjournment of the continuation hearing. At the adoption hearing the City Council must take public official action to adopt both the final levy and budget through a resolution. If the budget adoption hearing is held in conjunction with a regular City Council meeting, the budget adoption hearing must occur during the public portion of the meeting, and at a time that is specifically designated as the Truth in Taxation hearing. .>°� ,,.� .. .. .. .:. .. ,_ .�. . r. _ ...� - a... ... .-...: '^,+„._ �' •r'- t:-'.r - <'z?'__ -.i=•w �:. 7r. `ti ��-�- -n't' _•ck_r t fiei�.al.", .. -_ f... ^:R1 ;!�W .w. ]. TC,. .•_.�_.�� -: +.- :°ia :. f.: ['Yr' �/' �J . .i' ,x''15 •t� F w , Ti: r) . i r X , w 1#- tt i�^,..,,i�u, �a. ,r 4... Ih+ 1 +'.i v7 i)''li:'� � �' "'- .x �v!i3'e, `tiL '.r Y.l;'ii. u ...,.c4 r4+'..,i.r.. M•? %' y'et,. ?•+ '•,'1 ?c '�..n•?sJ .,'.: : J.. y. .il. , ...... : <:x, _ -�. n ff rl :..},.v Y...r,`v: :*, -[•r..J�':ii?°,: . 1'1 C F�1".h.. V !' r , '? '`l � �* Yid �i *�° � •" �� 7 1; :�.�ra' ( �?: , rtt.',�, ! y.. ' �;t '�. r,:��•u2,� : +��•�" .,.:: `� .� Reg, � {�yc � �• i' ` ' NO 'NOW b 2:'00;7r m8 - ,;:•t. ... s. ,r' S,f• ..h.. .;s. 1. � ,`,�� p , ,.r �1 1. �1.. Sh. -ri�- " " "!```���5 C ;� : t`�`;,,r ..'rC. f: i:; ++ ,, .'Rk e' � vy km r:j�. t : . v rsh ,4 o!. a =et fi 6.1 ecemabe� ,. .•�': hila`.,' J 4� xf 1. 1' .s,k.^: , p _!n 5!. • �.y} r +{. e. w -. ,11 ,a. r'1. f. 4, NNW r.. ,r. .. . ':'r' ,1. 4.. - 7...:f +A, "'E, t.�:.. r%_=' ': t r '.i�:.FS•r. _ ,,JJ � , r i , . }i. U ,: �r# •�,� U o .. , J . ,. Y.. _.. <. .....0 .... :.1'�fJ..i ., t ].r k., r.. �r .. .{ -.. , � F .,.p,•, S' f if`:f. 3 : a(Yg'. [w•: 'w.. , -.'1.. .0 3 ('.... ;. ... r, "t r L. N,. gie l�!?'�. i .,., t , Y -t r. Y.:��,,•q� Jt A:f,. .,1 2.. .._. 6.. .. J.r >L, �1,.. L, �� ,d. r.., ..,.,. ....._ .y, .�'i�- .5.,1. :.. .,. .... ,, .....'L"«w..w�. . . ,�K. 5. � xt. ., 1,..,, ,. JS„ „P;:; rM >.z ..,y�.I�..•. z..$ . ',,..,9 I_t a r 1s;�,.., -} y t_ .. ..x ..� , ..�. ,. :�A f a $i"r r. .. x 3-. .u. .7 . _ .!.•i e. ,.x }} h u i .,A, .. S .. ?�:. � H., 6. a,.,. z.,_ ,... i°T r F '.,,•r,r. - ,x•.ir k.J:v Z - - ii.. e ,.. ,.,,K. ...;.,.; irm .: ., ,<ti,. .: w ..y .,,.,- YC,.,. �� t i � •d+•: >✓• ::Y. ,f� .. y.. aa., a,a .. .,., _ . .. �... ;.. ., .'!f x,,« .;Y J.a'3. F. iu ..:. t,. .. c, r , ,.:! . 7 4 ,i„ .. .. -r.... ✓ ......� -h, �], :, f -.�J {• F-- t.''id'�? '.,. +.. rJ' 'irl ,,....- a...... ..a :, 1 ! -.r , :M17 .e r.} J.,d:.. P l.a .l _.. .:.. ..f ..k l�>✓, , <;a..,.. 'y .._ } ,.�:.. +1 .... ._ �. -, �Y, '�t. .�`�77��,, ..,. ,- <,irr. +J, g .:. 7..,Hl.. 1 -. : >.. ,z1 „1,. -:ai }'- r,. -✓1,,. ..Y1 -; 4 ,,..�i.v'r"f}.n.l. u•N. r.iw PY ,a .. > � 4. , ..+ .,,. ., -, u.. -�, Xi, • �-� i _:3'- t �, -1:- - ,- A.. ?.: -:, ._ . A 9 4- ]-i' Y-.,..1 ..d r .71 . .+,-;E .. n. �,..1,.] �' 7 . ��r..n:<..y � .e l.r..3 Z. SS,a<.. ,�. 3 P;,x � j•�'S.� .r _.:... ,t, .�+.:�. _ ., , ,. ,.., .., . <. s,t .]... _.. l ...3 ! ...... , � .NxiY -°.. .. .X .. tl. _s..t- ]r..:,, .,..rc -..� ,z,_sa... - a,..f.r.} -, E- ..�,F -a'r3„ k. ,.,^,..rt• #...,[,�..._! .,.,E.. - .w...J ,. .. . _.,t..:. , �..,,. Xta . -. >.-�•, .:. .:..� :, , - :.� ," ,�. •` .71.7 3. rY . r+ - •, •Y ,- ,,. 6..r xf ,r r...r• „;qa_. .::� E`_ ^a, i�•�,.i. : >': '`w'=�x 't.' .� F1v =r� t .rr_.. , ,,r w >••:.., .,.<. qL .,.,xr ,r8... i , l'; .> <., 1. ,._k.., . .. -, ._. .f�,:a,..,,. in..,, _J .C: .t.. a «W _r... ,>�.a :rl:�'-'.� -! J 5Y• "..�, �. ���� § >� i .): r,� :f,?._ •�cr,.:s -: -. +! l.,.r ,$}...�-w� �:T• ,_'�. ,:%.T 1�, .. rii ..._ � f:. �k �, ] f�- - -r� ^k, :�•• a: +J= +- r. zS:s�Rq.: >5 ,r.S� ,k e,h� �..,. 1:,F. �'� �."i.r. ,. -, .._,.� .r.."h»•h �x7E ..=,i.,r'.1.: .a. :t`.. .f . -,�_ . ., ,j'a... - _.t i. ,f r.. ,�r ,, d t. ,::., }. _.... � ..yip ,. , ,.pl a. , .ef,1. ,.. r... x.... , ,,. .. SHw itJ. z.. ,.. 2k,q•`ti•„L�',. -•]k, .��. _. ::P"''.i �, ... r..:. w =.h�:� -`,n. _.n .TJr- t 1: 4 r..: <: =. ., , *:.,<, � , . � �. x [. J # . �>x... ti5.. G .+' 1 id .F... 4 ,,.,.....1. r•. .4 .a 4 a , �., .,x?:.- .[r.Y,- r_.:,i!_L�.?,1.�. aid:'. �. S`.- �..k�.s...JlssaL.6i= ]_.�v.. �"�:w � s��s::. ��^. 3:?+ R; 7. li; i1$ �. c�31I=, i��e_:.. �= rstr4t.�.L.dti,�nd,f.c.lS�.yr�i +dr�r.: iki..+..^�St"'_!.r.w._ dE.:.:: �>: d,' ec x.. w...,.+. t^• 1' e.' W: kyutKu. s�iek;_. �(. 1a, Sf: i} �!. rjh,: 4v:: shF+ ��fi .%s,>awa...,uaiin`'?'"•.An:tiF v -� .�:.. /.:- �]rlit�pi.'r,$i _:l -�•,, Monday Tuesday R Wednesday < Thursday Fnday _h . Sat/Sun ',+ ,27 =_, 30,E �� l�tr,December� - ....' -R_.. r., _:, ,.... .. ,. .. .. .: ,.. .,,..,. .arm 'rm�7'r^'r' ^.-- ^-.*�., --r: .'r"'':'rr ,,, •er! :... '� ,e �'f�, � �•^ 7 •�- •s,.;.... -r*:_ ,..,r,. .P�' . ;r' ,: .b� f � n � _ ,�.s";fi""_: r a>, ': �s+�cT' .y i ��'•'I' fr 9 'mac, -:3�x Z :.. .?. .. .. . T i F_ �,.:_ :, ! _. �.r� ! � , , �, � >•] , Jh ..fi'3�.... 4 L. ,.:. .. !. :]:, . F .,. ... ....11 J, �� � .� ,:�, - ., � ,__ � ,:.� . 4� .. ,F, 1 :. a✓L!4 n�fi<..,yR.,.. , _ .� .: ,.,,. � � � }„ €,4 _..�. .. _ � 5 � E r x+ ,. .. x: •s, a:'r' ,? a .t. d. ., > -. ,fr — INITIAL INITIAL INITIAL - LLh���' .. ....: -,.i i { �. r.. ._r.a.2 f... - : iva ..... r?.. a',c.: �:.,.. ..✓3r, .,x .+,, -_, ., ,3 ,.,ja z'd. ��-3'� }ry� i� ""t F . 1- .:.. ,r., f,(£ ,�'!Y,., . .. x l+'4LJ�F.:d:'�1- a .. ,�; r'�Q�•' .. 4�'. �+., r A.m •s � 'INITIAL INITIAL — .r•: ,. - -,:, n :•” .•. d.. . ., • V .� : � , f J .. -}.,...S,f ,. �. �._ v�' . ,« t ( t+a7 . t'- r e�..?�' , -:k.::., ”. .,, d �. i : }. i: :, i r :"�7 r C ' ' "..r:.s ?.',., t . };lm r-, .Y . .•. «. F F il' 1 'N a "mo w•:, [:. � 4t f_ .:r .1 . b r $, '- . ., .. � .'. „3 .l. _ e ,,;�r , .: „ . , ..l+, .ir.i 1c P, � ..;:{xn� - . ,_;..Y ': � ,,t, , I a . �t r. ? ,�. °"� n 7 y 9):y. 4 : , ]�.r•V. . a',:�..J . 7-� :, .. „r. _�,� >7� 7', J:."�j :.5, :is)n:,: , ,3h d L- xt.: . n a :.� . . ,r'- , ., 3 C A e .� a . - , . 5�. , .:i . - n.?_1_ INITIAL INITIAL IN ITIAL ,. .,,...,s_., ..... m. � _- .. -.. ,"�4' ✓^ _ ..'6 ,1... ,.,. ,a -.. .rP°, .: �, :.:• `dt+ � ,.. r,;.. , '�'.. .w, �., ,�,�, �a.: �;� � �:;�'� t.,� +24�• ✓z. , s. '-r , +a,. �.c.; . r - ._,a .'.e.._ .,'-iw 1., .,:e.�'3 ,e`.: ,!. :,.TS. ....i t. ,,,... ,.... ...,.r ,� i L ..],. d .:,.,- - � , � .w. ,t : 1.. . '{r., , k ?d'. 4• , ... , �' .a � �;vt� u:P�;.! �- ,N,.t£ J;��a Y�- r�; -.r P�.:?25����..� � : -,�`�u a�.,�,,.t c ..a_. �,:.26�;r yr+ - r„ . xr , , -9., : Z. - -.:• x e.. :t:, ,. �_, ,'✓,'Y.' ::. _, 1. ..:9 r. _ .,.,. - 'MS -''.. ,t ] ,���� y �,�f :,'.���_,�: ��27��:._ . -. .: 3 ,y-. TL5'� a'°i"rl 'd-"?' �.,. ,i7..., .. }.., „..r' �# 'E:. }� ,d. �.,;�. � ..:�h. � rr a� ,P28 F , "fr•rzi . � �Dwy �- :. n, ,.1k , .'� 1;;rT 'u -1fir. ; -.,, _ - �.�+w�_ �� _ � , :�t.� -2 ..7 r ��i-�tf :1 d a�•3A rtr �vr���.,, ,}`t,���" .�- 43'1.. -.,- ._ ,. ?._ .., -._, "' 3 - ' 2 Deb Mangen -n: Laura Fulton .: Monday, August 27, 2007 8:52 AM To: 'jhovland @krauseroll ins. com'; 'Housh, Scot; 'jonibennettl2 @comcast.net'; 'ANN SWENSON'; 'Immasica @aol.com' Cc: Deb Mangen Subject: FW: HOLIDAY GAS STATION From: Penelope Purdum [mailto:penne @raksales.com] Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 9:42 AM To: Laura Fulton Subject: FW: HOLIDAY GAS STATION 9GC s 1Z Please note that the screaming started again this morning at 9:30 - they are having another car wash. That means that not only was my Saturday ruined by screaming children from 10:OOa until 4:OOp now my Sunday is ruined starting at 9:OOa and who knows how long they will go today. Please, there has got to be something that can be done about this. I realize that corporate America is important but isn't peace in the home place just as important. Shouldn't I have the opportunity to enjoy my home on the weekend? Penelope Purdum RAKIETEN SALES r o @raksales.com .440 -7615 www.raksales.com From: Penelope Purdum [mailto:penne @raksales.com] Sent: Sunday, August 26, 2007 12:50 AM To: 'edinamail @ci.edina.mn.us' Subject: HOLIDAY GAS STATION To the Mayor and Council, I need your help. I have tried for years to work with the Holiday Station on Interlachen and Vernon regarding the noise that comes from the station after hours and as a result of the car washes they run on the weekends for the local schools. It is 12:27 at this moment and I was just awakened by the truck that delivers gas in the middle of the night. This tanker honks its horn for some reason more times than not and it has a backup beeper. So to get into the correct position to dispense the gas it take about 3 minutes of beeping. Now this may seem trivial but at 12:27 at night on a Saturday night then again on a Monday night and then again on a Wednesday or Thursday night week after week after week, it gets to be a bit much. I am sure you are enjoying the beautiful weather we are having and so am I. That said tryingto have my windows open this evening was difficult with the Kids hanging out at the Holiday Station playing their music loud and revving their engines (I must say this happens more often on the weekends of the car washes). That brings me to another subject. From 10:OOa to 4:OOp this afternoon I had to listen to teenage girls YELLING AT THE TOP OF THEIR LUNGS " CAR WASH" and then every teenage boy with a car driving by honking and screaming out the window (not to mention the adult men honking and yelling). This is ridiculous over the years I have written letters to Holiday, called and requested that they ask the kids to respect the r 'Khborhood and be quiet, I have called the police and asked them to do something about the yelling, I have even gone and asked the kids themselves to keep it down. All with no positive results. I for one see no reason for a gas station in L-_ ., ,a especially on Interlachen Blvd to be open 24 hours a day but if they are going to be open could they at least have their deliveries done before 10:OOp so the neighbors could get some sleep. I think a bit of respect is called for here. This is a neighborhood. I realize I live on a busy street but that has nothing to do with the lack of consideration by Holiday. I pay my taxes for those kids to go to school why can't they have the car washes up at the High School? I get two days off a 8/27/2007 week and to have one of those days twice a month filled with screaming from teenagers (especially when I have no children myself) is really not acceptable. Please keep in mind that these kids sit in the median and harass drivers along with standing in the road at times. That intersection is a nightmare on a good day let along when scantily clad young ladies are'jumping up and down begging for money. I am hoping that you can help me get across to the owners of Holiday that they need to act like a respectful neighbor and have their business practices quigt down after the 10:OOp hour when most of us are trying to sleep. Please let me know if you are able to help. Sincerely, Penelope Purdum penne@raksales.com 612 - 940 -7615 8/27/2007 4'91 /A,l'�l� e h En J, 10 City of Edina August 30, 2007 Mrs. Mary Sue Adey 6201 Chowen Av. So. Edina, MN 55410 Dear Mrs. Adey, I am sorry that the officers did not meet your expectations on the August 11, 2007 medical call for service at your residence. I have talked with both officers about your concerns and recommendation. They did offer an explanation or alternate version that I will pass onto you. Our police officers are trained as Emergency Medical Technicians and are dispatched on all medical calls in the city. One of the tasks we are trained to perform is to get a list of medications for the paramedics. Knowing the medications provides critical information for the diagnosis and emergency treatment. They were following proper protocol when they asked for the medications. Both officers stated that your son had a negative attitude toward them from the outset. He did not politely ask them to leave the room - he ordered them to leave. The reason they were talking at the patrol car afterward is because they have not had such a strange encounter on a medical call before. The officers told me that one family member apologized for your son's demeanor, stating that he was under a lot of stress after returning from Iraq. I also spoke to the paramedics on.the call and they confirmed the officers' version of events. They said that your son tried to take control of the event from the outset and order the emergency responders on what to do. The officers did respond. assertively when they were ordered out of the room. If there were clear -cut misconduct by our officers I would take appropriate action. In this case I do not find sufficient evidence of improper conduct to take further action. If there are additional facts I should be aware of please contact me at 952- 826 -1610. Sincerely, cV\M Michael Siftari Chief of Police cc: Mayor Hovland Edina Police Department Administration (952) 826 -1610 4801 West 50th Street Fax (952) 826 -1607 Edina, Minnesota Police 24 hr. and TDD Line (952) 826 -1600 SSd9d -1 Iqd August 19, 2007 Police Chief Michael Siitari Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th St. Edina MN 55424 Dear Police Chief Siitari, One week ago Saturday - August 11, 2007 — my family required an ambulance to transport my husband Lee, to the ICU at North Memorial Hospital. Needless to say it was a stressful time for all of us. The two Edina Rescue paramedics who responded were excellent. However, the two young first response officers who preceded them into the house were offensive in their swaggering demeanor. They came in without an introduction or greeting, demanded to see a meds list and walked into the bedroom. At that point I was feeling uncomfortable in my own house. I felt they were hoping to find a meth lab rather than be there to assist us in a helpful and empathetic way. I didn't need it. Our son — who has just returned from a long deployment in Iraq — has been helping me care for his father. When eight people gathered in the relatively small bedroom — given a king sized bed and a stair chair — he asked, very politely ( not knowing that the police officers are required to be there to assist the paramedics) that the two officers perhaps step out of the room. Rather than using it as a teaching moment in a delicate situation, Officer Conboy ( ?) responded aggressively by ordering my son out of the bedroom. That was unacceptable. Conboy ( ?) seemed very eager to trump my son with his misplaced machismo. To top it off, afterwards, the two officers stood at the patrol car, laughing and scratching, I could only think it was at my sons' expense. I spoke to them briefly, told them they were over zealous and could use a lot of honey in their approach. My recommendation, if asked, is that these two young men put their cockiness in their pockets and return to school to learn how to be kind, compassionate and communicative with the citizens in their community. After all, there are people who should not work in nursing homes. Perhaps there are those who should not be first responders. It's my understanding that the police are here to serve the community, not to treat its members with suspicion and contempt. Sincerely, Mary Sue Adey 6201 Chowen Av S Edina MN 55410 952 285 -6471 cc: Mayor Jim Hovland Deb Mangen om: Laura Fulton Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 8:52 AM To: 'jhovland @krauserollins.com'; ' Housh, Scot'; 'ANN SWENSON'; 'Immasica @aol.com'; 'jonibennettl2 @comcast.net'; Marty Scheerer; Tom Jenson Cc: Deb Mangen Subject: FW: recreational fires nuisance 44VO SEAL ----- Original Message ----- AGG27�,?007 From: Susan Khatri [ mailto :dragontales3l@hotmail.com] 6Y CE�VED Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 10:30 PM To: Laura Fulton Subject: recreational fires nuisance James Hovland, Mayor Joni Bennett, City Council Scot Housh, City Council Linda Masica, City Council Ann Swenson, City Council Marty Scheerer, Fire Chief Tom Jenson, Fire Marshal I concerned about recreational fires that cause noxious smoke smells to permeate my Edina home. T cannot breathe inside my house when smoky fires are burning on my street. three children are bothered by the smoke. My husband and all children have asthma and are non - smokers. I cannot have my windows open on a pleasant summer evening because of these fires. If I wanted to sit around a smoky campfire, I would go camping. But this is a city and this is my home, and it fills with a strong noxious smoke smell when there are backyard fires west of me. Tonight I called to report this situation and two members of the Edina Fire Department responded. They were rude and dismissive and obviously thought the whole thing was a big joke and treated me like I was some kind of crank, because they did not smell "any smoke" as they stood outside in the light breeze. I was visited by Doug Bagley and Jeff Seems. I said when my two story 1958 home with casement crank out window fills with a noxious smoke smell from the west, I have to go outside myself for some fresher air, because the air volume and air movement of the outside helps dissipate the smoke. Thirty to forty minutes prior to their arrival I had closed all my windows and turned on my AC, doing my best to reduce the smoke particulate odors in my house. I preferred not to have these two rude individuals in my home, especially when they so clearly indicated they did not believe me at all about any smoke problem of any kind, so I said I preferred they not enter my home and they abruptly walked off and did not respond to any further inquiry. Plus they had already said they weren't going to do anything about the fire anyway. The fire department says they receive few complaints. I expect it is because their response to the complaints they do receive is so non - responsive and is intended to discourage complaints. It does no good to complain to them about smoke from recreational ires. There must be a remedy for persons like myself who are subjected to noxious woodsy smoke in their homes. Sincerely yours, 1 Susan Khatri 5005 Richmond Drive Edina Requirements listed below shall apply to all recreational fires Fires may be ordered extinguished and this permit revoked by the Fire Department if: a) any recreational fire requirement is violated, or b) if a fire hazard exists or develops, or c) we receive valid complaints from your neighbors regarding the fire, smoke or other nuisances. Find a local pizza place, movie theater, and more....then map the best route! http: // maps. live. com / default. aspx? v= 2 &ss =yp. bars- yp.pizza- yp.movie %20theater &cp = 42.358996 - -71. 056691& style= r &lvl =13 &tilt=- 90 &dir =0 &alt =- 1000& scene = 950607 &encType =1 &FORM= MGAC01 Deb Mangen m: Laura Fulton Thursday, August 23, 2007 3:16 PM To: 'jhoviand @krauserollins.com'; 'Housh, Scot'; 'Immasica @aol.com'; 'ANN SWENSON'; 'jonibennett12 @comcast.net' Cc: Deb Mangen Subject: FW: Wooddale at Valley View From: hattieb [mailto:hattieb @comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 12:51 PM To: Laura Fulton Subject: Wooddale at Valley View I understand that the council will be discussing the re -doing of that corner. As a neighbor, I ask you to leave the mall alone. We need gas, hardware, food,etc.. The parking is good and easy. 50th and France has lost the charm of a village, parking is hard and traffic is unforgiving. Please leave the little mall in the middle of a neighborhood as is. A -41 8/23/2007 Deb Man en ,m: Laura Fulton Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 2:03 PM To: 'jhovland @krauserollins.com'; 'Housh, Scot'; 'Immasica @aol.com'; 'ANN SWENSON'; 'jonibennettl 2 @comcast. net' Cc: Deb Mangen Subject: FW: Support Arneson Parkway -- Original Message---- - From: Lorenzo Tunesi [mailto :lorenzo.tunesi @gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, August 23, 2007 12:35 PM To: Laura Fulton Subject: Support Arneson Parkway Dear City Council members, I urge you to do your utmost to make Arneson Parkway come alive and replace the current high traffic 70th street. Thank you very much, Lorenzo Tunesi 4413 Ellsworth Drive Edina, MN 55435 REGR!VEO 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD TUESDAY, JULY 10, 2007, AT 7:00 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL — COMMUNITY ROOM 4801 WEST 50TH STREET MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Bob Kojetin, Chris Rofidal, Karen Ferrara, Lou Blemaster, Connie Fukuda, and Jean Rehkamp Larson, MEMBERS ABSENT: Laura Benson, Nancy Scherer and Sara Rubin STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner OTHERS PRESENT: Robert Vogel, Preservation Consultant Dave Terwilliger, 4523 Wooddale Avenue Mike Wagner, 4506 Wooddale Avenue Kenneth & Lori Feinberg, 4512 Wooddale Avenue Kirby Herman, 5829 Brookview Avenue I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: June 12, 2007 Member Rofidal moved approval of the Minutes from the June 12, 2007 meeting. Member Rehkamp Larson seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. II. CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS: 1. H -07 -7 4508 Wooddale Avenue New Detached Garage Planner Repya explained that the subject property is located on the west side of the 4500 block of Wooddale Avenue. The existing home is identified as an English Cottage style constructed in 1924. A 2 stall detached garage is located in the northwest corner of the rear yard, 4.5 feet from the side and rear, accessed by a driveway running along the north property line. The subject request involves demolishing the existing 532.6 square foot detached garage and building a new, 704 square foot 3 stall detached garage. The plan illustrates the new structure will maintain the existing 4.5 foot setback from the side and rear property lines. A new curb cut is not required since the existing driveway will provide access to the proposed garage. Minutes — July 10, 2007 Edina Heritage Preservation Board a Ms. Repya pointed out that the new 3 stall detached garage is proposed to be 22'x 22' and 11' x 20' for a total of 704 square feet in area. The design of the structure is proposed to compliment the English Cottage architectural style of the home which is undergoing an addition to the rear. Stucco siding with accented stonework is proposed for the walls with half- timber detailing on the gable ends, and triple layer lifetime shingles to match the house are proposed for the roof. The north and south elevations propose an attention to detail with a window on both sides and a service door on the south elevation. A Tudor - detailed gable. and two windows are shown on the west (rear) elevation., Carriage overhead doors and half- timber detailing with a window above the doors is shown on the east elevation. The height of the proposed garage is shown to be 22.5 feet at the highest peak, 16.25 feet at the mid -point of the gable, and 9.5 feet at the eave line. The lot coverage for the property with the proposed garage will be 3,082.69 square feet in area or 24.79 %; the maximum allowed,by code is 25% or 3,109.07 square feet. The proponents have provided information regarding characteristics of garages adjacent to the subject property. The data indicates that detached garage to the north at 4506 Wooddale Avenue is a hipped roof structure, approximately 14 feet at the highest peak, sitting 5.2 feet from the shared property line. The property to the south at 4510 Wooddale Avenue has an attached garage on the rear of the home, roughly 11 feet in height with a deck above it. The three homes to the west on Edina Boulevard all have 3 stall attached garages at least 25 feet from the shared lot lines. Ms. Repya concluded that Staff finds the plans provided with subject request meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, demonstrate an attention to detail on all elevations, and clearly illustrate the scale and scope of the project relative to the principle home and adjacent properties. Furthermore, Preservation Consultant, Robert Vogel has reviewed the plans and determined that the information provided meets the requirements of the Country Club Plan of Treatment. Approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness for the new garage is recommended subject to the plans presented. Board Member Comments: Member Rehkamp Larson questioned the purpose for the gable on the west (rear) elevation of the garage. She opined that the gable was odd in form, served no function, and appeared superfluous. Member Ferrara shared Ms. Rehkamp Larson's concerns, commenting that the gable appeared strange and unnecessary considering the plan provides two windows on the west elevation, adding sufficient detail to the space. 2 Minutes — July 10, 2007 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Member Rofidal appreciated Ms. Rehkamp Larson's concerns, but added that he. liked the design of the garage, particularly the recessed third stall on the south end. Members Blemaster and Kojetin stated that they felt the gable on the west elevation added interest to the design which they liked. Ms. Blemaster also inquired about the accent stonework proposed for the exterior walls. Consultant Vogel commented that because there are no prescriptions for historic garages, some of the decisions required of the Board deal with aesthetics — that being the case, the gable on the west elevation, while not necessary, does improve the view shed from adjacent properties. Homeowner Comments: Addressing questions from the Board, owner Dave Terwilliger explained that the gable on the west elevation was an aesthetic consideration to the design. The westerly neighbor on Edina Boulevard has a swimming pool in their rear yard, and the gable was added with their view in mind. Co -owner Mike Wagner added that the gable was also designed to compliment the rooflines found on the rear elevation of the home. Responding to the question regarding the accented stonework proposed, Mr. Terwilliger explained that natural stone is proposed to compliment the stonework found on the home. Decision: Member Rehkamp Larson moved approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness subject to the plans presented and the condition that the gable on the west elevation be removed. Member Rofidal seconded the motion. Upon a roll call vote, Members Ferrara, Rofidal, and Rehkamp Larson voted aye. Members Blemaster, Fukuda, and Kojetin voted nay. Motion denied due to a tie. Member Blemaster then moved approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness subject to the plans presented and the condition that the homeowners and adjacent neighbor decide whether to keep the gable on the west elevation, advise the Planner of the decision, and provide a revised copy of the plan if the gable is removed. Member Rofidal seconded the motion. All voted aye. The Motion carried. 3 Minutes — July 10, 2007 . Edina Heritage Preservation Board 2. H -07 -8 4512 Wooddale Avenue New Detached Garage Planner Repya explained that the subject property is located on the west side of the 4500 block of Wooddale Avenue. The, existing home is identified as a New England Colonial Revival style constructed in 1924. A 2 stall detached garage is located in the rear yard, 24.5 feet from the rear and 13.6 feet from the north property line, accessed by a driveway running along the north property line. The subject request involves demolishing the existing 416 square foot detached garage and building a new, 672 square foot 2 stall detached garage. The plan illustrates the new structure will be placed in the northwest corner of the yard 4 feet from the rear and 9 feet from the side property line. A new curb cut is not required since the existing driveway will provide access to the proposed garage. Ms. Repya pointed out that the new 2 stall detached garage is proposed to be 28' x 24' for a total of 672 square feet in area. The design of the structure is proposed to compliment the architectural style of the home. Stucco siding is proposed for the walls, and asphalt shingles to match the house are proposed for the roof. The north and south elevations display an attention to detail with a window on north side and a service door on the north elevation. The east and west elevations propose a window centered in the gable end (above the overhead door on the east elevation.) The height of the proposed garage is shown to be 24.5 feet at the highest peak, 17.5 feet at the mid -point of the gable, and 10 feet at the eave line. The lot coverage for the property with the proposed garage will be 2,669 square feet in area or 22 %; the maximum allowed by code is 25% or 3,000 square feet. The proponents have provided information regarding characteristics of garages adjacent to the subject property. The data indicates that the attached garage to the north at 4510 Wooddale Avenue is centrally located in the rear of the home measuring 11.5 feet in height with a deck above it. The property to the south at 4514 Wooddale Avenue has a detached 2 stall garage in the southwest corner of the rear yard measuring approximately 20 feet to the peak of the hip roof. Two of the three abutting homes to the west on Edina Boulevard all have 3 stall attached garages at least 25 feet from the shared lot lines. The home at 4515 Edina Boulevard has a 3 stall detached garage measuring approximately 15.25 feet to the highest peak. In conclusion, Ms. Repya explained that Staff finds that the plans provided with subject request meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance, demonstrate an attention to detail on all elevations, and clearly illustrate the scale and scope of the project relative to the principle home and adjacent properties. However, it is the scale of the project, specifically the height of the garage which raises some concerns. Since 2003, the Heritage Preservation Board has reviewed 21 proposals for 2 stall detached garages. The average height of the garages has 4 Minutes — July 10, 2007 Edina Heritage Preservation Board been 18 feet to the peak and 13.9 feet to the midpoint of the gable. The proposed garage is shown to be 24.5 feet to the peak and 17.5 feet to the midpoint of the gable. (Note 18 feet is the maximum height allowed at midpoint by code.) A representative for the homeowner has explained that the reason for the 24.5 foot height is to provide more storage space above the parking stalls. Staff did advise the applicant that building height is a serious consideration of the Board. Preservation Consultant, Robert Vogel has reviewed the plans and determined that the information provided meets the requirements of the Country Club Plan of Treatment. Staff recommends approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness for the new garage with the understanding that the Board may wish to have the proponent reevaluate the building height. Board Member Comments: Member Rehkamp Larson made the following observations: • The 672 square foot garage makes sense for the property considering the size of the lot. • The 12/12 pitch of the roof appears somewhat steep — a 10/12 pitch would reduce the roof peak by 2 feet to 22.5 feet. • While attention to detail is demonstrated on all elevations, the windows in the plan appear to be casement style — Double hung windows would be consistent with the home's windows. Member Rofidal added that in addition to lowering the height at the peak, he would prefer the height at the eave line to be more consistent with the averages of the garages approved thus far — 8 to 9 feet instead of the 10 feet proposed. Homeowner Comment: Homeowners Kenneth and Lori Feinberg appreciated the comments from the Board pointing out that the existing garage is falling apart and they are attempting to replace it with a larger structure that will provide more room for storage while at the same time be in proportion with their lot and home. The Feinberg's added that they would be happy to entertain changes to the plan proposed by the Board. Decision: Member Rehkamp Larson moved approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness subject to the plans presented and the following conditions: 1. The pitch of the roof is reduced to 10/12 2. The eave line height is reduced to 8.5 to 9 feet 6� Minutes — July 10, 2007 Edina Heritage Preservation Board 3. Double hung windows with muntins to match the windows on the home are used on the on the east, south and west elevations. Member Ferrara seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. III. COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT - Survey Progress Report — June: Consultant provided the following report of the June survey activities: Reconnaissance Survey The windshield reconnaissance survey of the District was completed prior to the June 12 meeting of the Heritage Preservation Board. This 'once over lightly" inspection involved driving around the District and noting the different types of houses, their general condition, and the landscape characteristics of streetscapes. I took a close and careful look at Infill" houses, i.e., homes. built since the 1950s, and made a detailed inspection of sample blocks to compare with 1980 inventory data with present conditions. More intensive field inspections will be conducted of individual properties to gather the information needed to evaluate their heritage landmark eligibility. Historic Property Evaluations Work continues on re- evaluating the heritage preservation value of individual properties in the District. For a property to qualify as individually significant, it would need to meet one of the Edina Heritage Landmark eligibility criteria by being associated with an important historic context and by retaining historic integrity of those architectural features necessary to convey its significance. To qualify as contributing within the Landmark District, a house does not have to be individually significant; however, it must retain sufficient historic integrity (design, materials, and setting) to convey its sense of time and place. Because of teardowns, partial teardowns, and inappropriate exterior remodeling, the following properties should no longer be considered heritage resources: 4529 Arden, 4609 Arden, 4619 Browndale, 4631 Casco, 4512 Drexel, 4601 Drexel, 4622 Drexel, 4619 Moorland, 4503 Wooddale, 4508 Wooddale. Preliminary Findings While it is not complete, the re -survey has already generated important information that will help city planners revise both the heritage resources inventory and the district plan of treatment. • Thorpe Bros. approval of designs for new homes built in the District ended July 1, 1944; the terminal date for the "period of significance," therefore, n Minutes — July 10, 2007 Edina Heritage Preservation Board should be 1944, although several of the homes built between 1945 and 1966 compliment the district's historic character and probably should be considered contributing resources. • Historic homes in the District include houses designed by architects J. J. (Jack) Liebenberg, Seeman Kaplan, Joseph V. Vanderbilt, Charles Trowbridge, Rollin Chapin, Milton C. W. Sundin, and A. R. Van Dyck • The most important home contractor /builders in the District were Carl and Louis Hanson, Morris Trach, Harry D. Roach, H. F. Nelson, George Gamble, A. C. Walby, Chester Thompson, and Anton Duoos. • The majority of existing homes in the District possess historical integrity of those features necessary to convey their historic character and significance; most of the infill new home construction (1945 -2006) appears to be compatible with adjacent historic properties. • Since the 1930s, zoning regulations have effectively eliminated large structural additions on the street facades of houses in the District; however, side and rear additions are common and larger than room -sized additions with architecturally incompatible features (roof lines, materials, massing) are sometimes readily visible from the street. Some major additions are so large they overpower the original house. • The outdoor deck is probably the most frequently introduced non - historic architectural feature in the District after garages; except in cases where they are structurally independent from the houses, patios, terraces, and decks often diminish or distract from historically important architectural elements. • Except for part of Browndale Avenue, the District was virtually bare ground when the homes were built; however, mature trees (boulevard and yard) have become an integral streetscape element and should be treated as historic landscape features. • Approximately 16 of the homes previously classified as examples of Rambler, Colonial Revival or Cape Cod probably should be recategorized as Minimal Traditional, the preferred catch -all classification for houses that architecturally reflect a compromise between the Period Revival and Modern styles, i.e., houses built between 1935 and 1950 which exhibit the massing and scale of the Period Revival styles but are generally devoid of authentic period style detailing or decorative elements. Architectural Database Members of the Heritage Preservation Board continued to review, organize, and record assessor data on individual properties in the District. Some minor discrepancies in street address and date of construction have been noted between the 1979 -80 survey data and assessor records. Board members observed that as Mr. Vogel indicated, since the City's zoning regulations were established in the 1930's large additions haven't occurred to the 7 Minutes — July 10, 2007. Edina Heritage Preservation Board front facade of houses, however that isn't the case in the side and rear yards. Many residents of the District incorrectly assume that the HPB oversees large additions to homes. Moving forward, the Board may wish to consider reviewing these additions. Consultant Vogel suggested the Board take a fieldtrip through the District to evaluate the impact some additions have had on the respective homes as well as the neighborhoods. Board members agreed to meet at a "To Be Determined Location" in the District on Tuesday, July 31St, at 7:00 p.m. to walk the streets and gain a perspective of the impact additions have had on the District. Consultant Vogel recommended that the HPB consider focusing their future efforts on educating the people who work with the Country Club residents; such as realtors and contractors, who can then act as ambassadors for the preservation movement. Providing workshops and lectures on various preservation topics, and making the sessions available to residents and the business community working in the District would do a lot to advance the cause of preservation in the neighborhood. In conclusion, Mr. Vogel explained that starting in September, the Board will begin focusing on elements of the Plan of Treatment at each meeting. Board members thanked Mr. Vogel for his report. No formal action was taken. IV. CONCERN OF RESIDENTS: None VI. OTHER BUSINESS: None VII. CORRESPONDENCE: None VIII. NEXT MEETING DATE: August 14, 2007 IX. ADJOURNMENT 8:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Joyce Repya I WILLIAMS EXECUTIVE SEARCH, INC. August 22, 2007 James Hovland, Mayor City of Edina 4801 West 50'' Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland: As a twenty -five year resident of Edina, I have shared the city's pride of providing premier public facilities, parks and recreational facilities. For many years, Braemar Golf Course has enjoyed its celebrity at the top of the city's list of renowned attractions evidenced by the fact that Braemar has hosted numerous state and national amateur tournaments and championships. Additionally the course hosted the last regular PGA tour stop event and it was previously rated among the top 75 public golf courses in the nation by Golf Digest. Braemar has the potential to be named one of the most attractive public golf courses in the nation in the future. As an avid golfer, who frequents the course often, and who uses it to entertain business clients and friends from all over Minneapolis /St. Paul, I am writing today to offer support for this vision, express concerns about the current state of the course, and to make recommendations so that the goal of Braemar being once again highly rated can be attained. In the past few years, on multiple occasions, I have observed a subtle decline in the attention dedicated to the care and preventative maintenance of the Braemar course and related park grounds. While responsiveness to current conditions is important, I believe this diminished condition, if it continues, will have a profound impact on Braemar and the city of Edina. Through this letter I would like to stimulate discussion leading to action around setting a vision for Braemar going forward. Edina has long valued its history and growth. The city has always had a reputation for excellence in its schools, residential neighborhoods, businesses and regional shopping areas, and has experienced a continuous rate of development as a result of its high quality parks, recreational facilities and lakes. However, Edina is in the midst of a changing demographic population. As aging members of the community move to retirement destinations or senior facilities elsewhere, the city will need to attract new residents by strengthening its most prized features and services. 4200 Wells Fargo Center' 90 South Seventh Street' Minneapolis, MN 55402 -3900 (612) 339 -2900 - FAX (612) 305-5040, www.williams- exec.com Mayor/ City of Edina Page Two Braemar, as one of Edina's most coveted recreational facilities, has great potential to help the city of Edina preserve its resident market share in the coming years if it maintains its preeminent reputation by improving its current conditions. The Park and Recreation Department recently completed a needs assessment survey, the findings of which support this position. The report concluded that 49% of respondent households have a need for 9 and 18- hole golf courses, 38% of Edina residents use Braemar and the course is the second most used park in the city. What is interesting is that according to the survey, respondents say walking/biking trails, natural areas and wildlife habitats, and golf courses are their top three park and recreation facilities. Braemar Golf Course includes all three types of areas since it is nestled in picturesque Braemar Park, 500 acres of rolling hills, scenic lakes, surrounded by beautiful, untouched oak ridges that give it a feeling of seclusion amidst its urban setting! Many survey respondents expressed an interest in the development of additional bikeways, pathways, trails and recreation centers — 84% of respondent households would use walking and biking trails for their exercise /fitness needs and to enjoy the outdoors and nature. I propose that an effort to preserve and enhance the beauty and natural environment of Braemar could definitively meet these needs, increase utilization of the facility, and help attract more families to Edina in the future. Furthermore, I would like to call your attention to the fact that the survey did not allow residents to affirm their support for improving Braemar through additional taxation. Example: Question 22 provided a list for respondents to choose from but did not include Braemar when asking about which services should receive the most attention. In my opinion, over the last decade the "bar was raised" through the addition of upscale public or for profit metro courses. The Chaska Towne Course, Edinborough, The Legends and Willingers serve as examples. There is an opportunity distinguish Braemer through setting a vision around a theme. Examples may include The Twin Cities Most Beautiful Urban Course; the Premier Teaching Course; the Course For Life or perhaps or some other distinguishing idea. Our cornerstones for competition with other courses should be based on our superior location, playability, superior quality and large driving range. Let other course's compete for the bargain shopper searching for the absolute lowest green fee. Knowing that the Park Board will use the survey results to make recommendations for the City's Comprehensive Plan and Capital Improvement Program, I would like to offer my support and propose the following marketing and revenue producing recommendations for consideration by the City Council: 4200 Wells Fargo Center, 90 South Seventh Street ' Minneapolis, MN. 55402 -3900 (612) 339 -2900 - FAX (612) 305 -5040 - www.williams- exec.com Mayor/ City of Edina Page Three Recommendations: ♦ Develop a long range plan that includes the goal of Braemar being viewed as the premier public course in the Twin Cities.: • Development of strategic partnerships with other community organizations such as the Edina Garden Council for specific projects. • Implementation of cause marketing campaigns such as educational programs for example: ■ Advertising that highlights health benefits of walking, hiking and biking using pictures of Braemar and its beautiful grounds Educational programs highlighting environmental issues such as low water conditions and how residents can use drought resistant perennials to protect the environment. Again, Braemar could be pictured in the campaign or featured in educational segments perhaps with the Edina Garden Council. ♦ Invite Gerten's Gardening experts to hold their regular Saturday morning show at the Club House. They could interview various individuals to highlight Minnesota native plants, our responsible watering practices, golf pro and the President of the Edina Garden Council. Programming would raise awareness of environmentally preferred gardening practices and Braemar Golf Course. ♦ Consider partnering with the Edina Foundation to help residents make tax deductible contributions that benefit parks & recreation but directly support the enhancements of Braemar Golf Course and park. Structured in the right way, Foundation efforts could feed and increase membership ♦ Consider advertising patron cards and open tee times on the City Hall Electronic message board, selling ten round punch cards for the driving range or other marketing initiatives. ♦ Consider raising green fees to be more in line with our benchmarked competition and direct the proceeds to capital improvements. ♦ Consider the developing a 50 mile (or kilometer) continuous trail in Edina utilizing existing trails, some roadsides, occasional sidewalks and the woods through Braemar. We could brand this as the "Nifty 50 ". I believe that there are other marketing activities that could enhance current revenue for Braemar and the City of Edina. While I hope to call attention to the maintenance issues that I have observed and documented, I believe that this is really an opportunity for various Edina community organizations and citizens to collaborate on elevating the quality and visibility of one of our City's most prized parks and recreation areas. 4200 Wells Fargo Center ' 90 South Seventh Street ' Minneapolis, MN 55402 -3900 (612) 339 -2900 FAX (612) 305 -5040 - www.williams- exec.com Mayor/ City of Edina Page Four In closing, I want to reiterate that I am concerned and I care. I would be happy to continue to meet with and support the leaders of the Edina City Council, Parks & Recreation Board, Edina Foundation and Braemar Golf Course to build community and financial support for this preservation and improvement project. Sincerely yours, Bill Dubbs President Williams Executive Search, Inc. Cc: Gordon Hughes, City Manager, City of Edina John Keprios, Park & Recreation Director, City of Edina John Valliere, General Manager, Braemar Golf Course Dick Crockett, Executive Director, Edina Community Foundation 4200 Wells Fargo Center' 90 South Seventh Street' Minneapolis, MN 55402 -3900 (612) 339 -2900 - FAX (612) 305-5040, www.williams- exec.com MEMORANDUM :. ER E I RA/'� E M T To: Edina Massing Task Force Re: FYI While this information packet is not directly pertinent to the height issue you are concerned with, it is however topically related and part of the larger Replacement Housing context within which you will be making your determination and recommendation. L O N O B E R P R l L L E R CEO, REPLACEMENT HOUSING SERVICES CONSORTIUM. LLC WWW .REPLACEMENTHOUSINGSERVICES.COM . i RE rO: E S C R V I C[ 5 August 2007 To: An Open Letter to the Edina Massing Task Force Re: Residential Building Height Regulation You were recently requested by the Edina City Council to reconvene, review and make specific recommendations for council action on residential building height regulation. Your initial charge was to review and make recommendations concerning the size, scale and mass of new home construction occurring in the community. The control or restriction of overbuilding is a three step process. First of all it requires defining it in a non - arbitrary, quantifiable manner, then a rational method for measuring it, and finally the means for the regulation and enforcement of it. Today's housing formulas and their size, scale and mass are not the result of ground coverage ratios, setbacks or height restrictions as much as market driven forces and economics. These require all new homes offered for sale to compete with all other homes within their appropriate category, in terms of price, square footage and amenities. Consumers make their decisions to purchase these new homes by comparing them with all homes within their price category and then selecting the one that they feel is the best in terms of overall value and ability to meet their specific needs. In Housing Replacement, the typical formula for retail pricing is 3 to 4 times actual site costs. For example, if a site (teardown) costs $300,000, the new home would typi- cally range in price from $900- I,200,000, depending on the particular builder's formula. It's total finished square footage would need to be between 3600 and 4800+ for it to effectively compete against other homes in these price brackets. These factors then determine its actual size, scale and mass. The trouble comes when applying this formula THE REPLACEMENT HOUSING SERVICES CONSORTIUM, LLC. 5200 WILLSON ROAD, SUITE 150, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 952.836.2665 WWW. REPLACEMENT HOUSING SERVICES.COM to different size sites. In East Edina this house would typically be built on a SO'- 60' wide lot and in West Edina on a 75' to 100'+ wide lot. With each having the same regulatory restrictions the difference in the size, scale and mass perception between the two would be quite dramatic. Attempting to control building size through regulation that ignores market reality and does not recognize the diversity of Edina's site and neighborhood composition will ultimately fail because of this. In all probability, given the market realities it will tend to redirect Housing Replacement efforts away from smaller sites, reducing their desirability, their subsequent market value and their overall neighborhood appreciation rates. It is a demonstrable fact that Housing Replacement activities within specific neighborhoods have significantly boosted property appreciation rates considerably above the community average. The central problem with utilizing engineering -based regulations in a replacement situ- ation is that with their one size for all methodology they fail to provide for economic, topographic or site specific differences occurring naturally within existing neighborhood configurations. Thus they call into question the issues of economic justice, equity and fairness as all site conditions are not, nor will not be equal. The issues of mass and scale are really those of proportionality and perception. They are based upon the relationship between site and structure size as perceived through individual interpretation. These decisions are governed by personal biases and prejudices and in themselves should not be the sole basis for public policy formulations. Additionally, restrictions on ground coverage and setbacks force building up, especially on smaller lots in order to provide the square footage the market demands for the price point, increasing vertical height, the exact opposite of what some are trying to restrict. Restricting height also tends to accentuate a building's horizontal mass; while manipu- lating height and roof pitches tend to minimize it. Building height is also affected by new component technologies like open web and energy heel trusses, basements that are developed as habitable lower cost space with egress and daylight windows, as well as consumer preferences which demand 9 -I0' ceilings and steeper roof pitches. Collectively these factors add 5 -8' or more vertical height to a new, two -story home versus one built 25 -30 years ago. These are present day realities and regulations that don't take them into account will not be viable in the long term. As housing stock ages, and lifestyles change, a community's housing stock must evolve to meet these needs if it is to continue to attract and hold its residents, especially in light of the anticipated demographic and competitive challenges soon to be facing all metro communities. Restricting building height is more punishing to sites with considerable vertical relief. Consider the effect on a home of the height increases described above and then subtract 5 feet from its allowable overall height and the scenario quickly becomes unworkable, especially in cases where the grade transition from front to rear is greater than I0 feet, further reducing the allowed building height. Recently the City of Minneapolis reduced its maximum residential building height, lowering it from 35 feet to 30 feet. Bloomington has recently enacted a regulation for walkouts similar to the one being considered here — (30' from average height at mid- point of the grade ) and have experienced a significant increase in variance requests from unhappy residents. Housing Replacement is a difficult and contentious issue for a number of reasons but it tends to become an emotional one because it involves physical change, prompting a visceral reaction from those intent on defending and protecting the status quo. You were initially organized as a Citizens Massing Task Force and identified in your report the need and desirability of a neighborhood - specific approach to this problem. You correctly identified the necessary approach then which has become increasingly apparent now. Effective Housing Replacement policy requires a significant shift from our present one - size -fits -all regulatory approach to one that recognizes the economic, 3 topographic and geographic differences that exist within the neighborhoods of this community and responds appropriately to the diversity inherent in them. Obviously, Housing Replacement has and will have significant long term impact on this community. Edina needs to develop a comprehensive strategy to properly address the complex issues involved. I urge you in the interim to recommend leaving the present building height regulation as it is, pending the formulation and development of a more comprehensive and equitable Housing Replacement plan. Lon Oberpriller President and C.E.O. The Replacement Housing Services Consortium, LLC. 952- 836 -2665 N Deb Mangen From: Laura Fulton ,It: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 7:36 AM 'jhoviand @krauserollins.com'; 'Immasica @aol.com'; 'ANN SWENSON'; 'Housh, Scot'; 'jonibennett12 @comcast.net' Cc: Deb Mangen; Cary Teague; Heather Worthington Subject: FW: Comprehensive Plan From: Pat Downey [mailto:psdowney @gmail.com] Sent: Monday, September 03, 2007 6:58 PM To: Laura Fulton Subject: Comprehensive Plan Planning Commission and City Council Thank you for presenting the draft plan to residents and giving us the opportunity for feedback. I attended the Braemar Quadrant Meeting held on Tuesday evening August 28 and felt the draft plan was presented thoughtfully. More Affordable Housing I do feel that Edina has started to slip in some areas and that our aging population will not be helpful in terms of changing that direction. If the City wants to continue to be dynamic and one of the more attractive Twin City bs it has to attract younger people so we have a balance. To attract young families we have the advantage o. _ong schools, nearby jobs and good City services. What is missing is affordable housing. City leadership and management will have to agree on that need and then be bold in promoting affordable housing where redevelopment is possible - setting a target of only 200 units over a ten year period is not a good start! Inclusionary zoning with the right transfer /credit system should be pursued and the Edina Housing Foundation should be encouraged to use the funds it already has to make Edina more affordable. More Attention to Major Roads and to Pedestrians/Bikes I agree whole - heartedly with the point made by one of the presenters that our major roads (France Avenue being a prime example) should be more attractive - look what SLP done to Excelsior Boulevard. We also need to make walking and biking easier - exercise is what we and our children need! Environment An overall strategy in one area of the plan seems appropriate. GlTY C� o!� SEAS Pat Downey SEC 7501 Hyde Park Drive 6`� 9/4/2007 September 2, 2007 Mayor Of The City Of Edina And City Council Members Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota Dear Mayor And Council Members: This purpose of this letter is to inform the Mayor and Council Members of a frightening incident that occurred on the evening of September 1, 2007 between the hours of eight P.M and eleven P.M. at the residence at 4359 Brookside Avenue in Edina. It involved the exploding of fire works by some young adults, and while this disgusting nonsense has been going on for years, this particular evening was quite different. There were some five to six extraordinary explosions that were of such magnitude that they could not be classified as normal pyrotechnics. They were more like natural gas explosions. The Police were called in, investigated the matter and left apparently concluding that there was nothing further they could do. The matter was simply dismissed as fire works. The Police did all they could, but it is not enough for the residents of the area. We who reside in the neighborhood are sick of the past fire works displays and we are loathe put up with a repeat of the events of Saturday, September 1. The residents of this neighborhood respectfully request that the Council do something to curtail this kind of behavior in the future. I am sure that the residents will do whatever they can to help in this effort. It was a sad day when the State Legislature changed the law to allow fire works in the hands of private citizens. The current law has been sadly abused. We cannot believe that these explosions were from materials of items that have been legalized in Minnesota. Sincerely, Roger Siverson 4350 Brookside Court #209 Edina, Minnesota =PERSPECTIVES ON REPLACEMENT HOUSING A CALL FOR THE FORMULATION AND INCLUSION OF A REPLACEMENT HOUSING POLICY IN EDINA'S COMPREHENSIVE P LAN REP-LACE M s 1. R v i c e s c " i u e j REPEACEM T o< C: N 5 i 1 U M C: August 2007 To: An Open Letter to Edina's Community Leaders Re: The Need for the Formulation and Inclusion of a Replacement Housing Policy In Edina's Comprehensive Plan The real housing issue before you is not that of size, scale and mass, but a larger one — the need for a long term community Housing Replacement and revitalization policy. You are now caught up in the opening round of a new national level urban housing renaissance and its inherent debate about the rebuilding of communities as time, deterioration and lifestyle obsolescence minimize the relevancy of much of the current housing stock. This issue is just now emerging in national consciousness and is beginning to attract intellectual and academic participants who see it as a promising new area for securing grants to study, research and consult on its causes and effects. It will soon gain additional prominence as it becomes increasingly recognized as an untapped market ripe for commercial exploitation by builders, home products manufacturers, distributors and merchants of all types. The inherent assumption driving ordinance change is that profit -driven builders and tasteless owners are blatantly conspiring to destroy neighborhood uniformity and consistency through over -scale building which must be checked in order to preserve their character. This complaint has been brought by citizens who are self - proclaimed arbiters of taste, culture, beauty and sophistication, and who regard many of these new homes as barbaric, intrusive and over the top evidence of conspicuous consumption. At the root of this dispute is a largely unrecognized cultural clash fuelled by the reverse migration of suburbanites to closer -in locations bringing their housing preferences, THE REPLACEMENT HOUSING SERVICES CONSORTIUM, LLC. 5200 WILLSON ROAD, SUITE 150, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 952.836.2665 WWW. REPLACEMENT HOUSING SERVICES.COM ideas and tastes to older established neighborhoods with a decidedly different housing heritage in terms of design, culture and values. This flashpoint typically occurs in neighborhoods with smaller size lots where the physical design, size and scale differences are more readily apparent. These current urban residents are naturally concerned about the mass and scale of new homes built on smaller, narrower lots common to their neighborhoods. Temporarily placated, they and their complaints will return with vehemence as it becomes increasingly apparent to them that the recent regulatory changes enacted or under consideration have little or no effect on their situation or concerns. This issue will not go away and will only resurface and intensify as you address the tear -down moratorium in Country Club and as more Housing Replacement occurs in these respective neighborhoods. A compromise solution always lies somewhere in between two extreme positions. The challenge comes in structuring one that addresses the needs of both groups, ensuring continuous housing growth and vitality while precluding excessive and overscale building. The initial problem comes in defining what is excessive or overscale building on a neighborhood by neighborhood basis. In reality, Edina is the metro leader with the most experience in the Housing Replacement arena and its subsequent tax -base growth. Its replacement efforts date from the late I980's and now comprise approximately S% of its 16,000+ owner occupied single family homes, not including the nucleating effect these have had on major remodeling projects occurring in their immediate vicinities. These combined efforts significantly contribute to its triple -A credit rating and help to grow its tax base an average of I0% per annum, contributing factors that put it in a rarified class of only 70 US cities today. This is a laudable accomplishment by any standard and a testament to skillful leadership and judicious fiscal policies that have led to a track record envied by virtually all metro communities. A record which, unlike Richfield and St. Louis Park, relies heavily on voluntary citizen housing reinvestment and their continuing belief it will be rewarded. 2 The present debate largely overlooks these facts and focuses instead on the issue of neighborhood change and appropriateness and targets as "undesirable" those individuals perceived to be altering and destroying neighborhood character. With a lengthy Replacement Housing track record, an excess of 1,000+ replacement homes and innumerable highly remodeled ones now in various neighborhoods, it would come as quite a shock to a significant portion of these residents to find out that some members of the community view their reinvestment, their homes and themselves as largely "undesirable" and part of a constituency in need of regulation and control to keep them from damaging their respective neighborhoods. This calls into question the issue of fairness — (who has the right to impose standards on whom and at what cost to whom ) an issue you are now attempting to address on behalf of all residents of this diverse community. The issue of Housing Replacement is about the regeneration of a community's housing stock, pure and simple. As such, it affords a unique opportunity for your to put your stamp on the future, with all the ramifications and risks inherent with those decisions. The housing policy decisions you make today will dictate how and in what, the residents of this community will live for the next hundred years. This is a heavy responsibility and one that will in large part determine the future social and economic make up of this community. This issue is also a pivotal one for long term housing development in Edina. Policies made today will ultimately determine how its housing stock will enable it to compete in the metro marketplace for the foreseeable future. Your decisions on this matter will affect not only what gets built, but also present and future property values and appre- ciation rates. Because of housing's intricate societal connections, even the most well intentioned policies can have unintended consequences for a community's long term economic and financial welfare. Throughout this process there have been innumerable meetings with considerable effort and energy invested by citizens, elected officials and staff. There has been a Massing Task Force, planning commission hearings, considerable mayor, council and 3 staff efforts expended, and queries made to various municipalities, the Humphrey Institute, the U of M School of Architecture and Design and other bodies, as well as citizen input elicited both pro and con. Despite these best efforts what has been missing in the process is the recognition of the need for a comprehensive Housing Replacement strategy in the overall municipal plan. The majority of efforts to date have been directed at restricting the size and height of new structures (with abuses defined by the "I know it when I see it" approach ) which can lead to divisive and discriminatory definitions and thus ultimately ineffective and damaging regulation. Meanwhile Housing Replacement issues have been at the root of a number of council actions and recent discussions: • A moratorium on teardowns in County Club • A construction noise ordinance • Materials and design considerations • Egress window positioning within setbacks • Construction length and duration These, for the most part, have or are being addressed as individual issues for regulatory consideration. They are not however, unrelated, and are all largely incidental to increased Housing Replacement activities. This incremental approach with a focus on individual issues tends to be reactionary and as such fails to adequately take into account their cumulative effect and impact on the larger issue of community -wide Housing Replacement. Today you are attempting to reformulate a one - size -fits -all building ordinance — one largely derived from an earlier subdivision development protocol — an approach that does not take into account the community's economic and neighborhood diversity, nor define overbuilding as such. Changing setback and side yard requirements in these situations could also put the ordinance in conflict with provisions of the new Eminent Domain law, a matter that must be examined carefully for City liability issues. 0 This fragmented approach is costly, time consuming and confusing. It also fails to take into account physical and economic building realities, consumer lifestyle and design preferences, and newer building techniques. Nor does it consider the needs of an aging population with requirements for one -floor living on smaller lots, or the host of other issues directly affecting housing revitalization and its need for continuous adjustment to maintain economic relevance. Housing Replacement is a natural tool for maintaining housing vitality. Its function I s to aid progressive community growth and revitalization. Replacement Housing should not be unnecessarily restricted, retarded or prohibited. When properly employed, it creates vitality, energy, synergy and community reinvestment. It grows equity, business and tax bases, and strengthens schools and municipal services. It is an invaluable tool for enlightened urban housing policy and management — one whose role is just now becoming recognized. Replacement Housing is not a community scourge, nor are its proponents attempting to destroy neighborhood fabric — they are participants in a market dynamic ahead of societal recognition of its true value and worth. A city is, in reality, its people. Its houses are their current habitat and the building blocks of its neighborhoods. A city has a vested interest in developing and implementing a housing policy that continuously strengthens and improves its ability to attract and maintain residents. For cities that are fully developed, replacement is the only option for continuous renewal and maintenance of economic relevancy. It is imperative that they formulate and adopt policies that encourage Housing Replacement and neighbor- hood revitalization while devising regulations designed to curb its abuses. We are still in the opening round of this contentious and continuing debate. Now is the time to be proactive not reactive by stepping to the forefront and addressing this metro -wide Housing Replacement issue, reasserting Edina's leadership role. Your recent actions have bought you some time, however less than you think. Now is the opportu- nity to use this time to develop an effective community -wide plan that addresses the complex issues involved in an equitable manner for all your constituents. S For these reasons, T strongly urge you to take the necessary steps to make the reasoned formulation and inclusion of a Housing Replacement Strategy an integral part of Edina's Comprehensive Development Plan. Enclosed for your review are suggestions for ordinance change and a few contextual articles relevant to the larger Housing Replacement issue that have recently appeared in U. S News and World Report and the Star Trikiie. Collectively they underscore some of the points made here, raise others, and illustrate the complexity of dealing with housing trends and issues in general. They also point out the fluidity of the situation and the need for intelligent, timely, comprehensive strategies to address these various issues as they arise and evolve. Lon Oberpriller President and C.E.O. The Replacement Housing Services Consortium, LLC. rol MEMORANDUM Included for your consideration is a recommendation for improving the present ordinance that would make it considerably more applicable for the community's diverse economic and physical needs. It would go a long way towards quieting dissent and dissatisfaction because it employs a different and more equitable criteria that defines overbuilding' and recognizes neighborhood d fferences based on economic and market realities. It does however diverge from the standard regulatory practice of treating all physical sites the same. It would establish a precedent that recognizes the different requirements and challenges of inserting new housing in existing neighborhoods as opposed to earlier building formulas designed for initial subdivision development. Inclusion of these ideas would result in a more progressive and forward looking ordinance that could serve as a model for other communities attempting to address similar concerns. It would once again clearly demonstrate Edina-'s commitment, leadership and foresight in creatively addressing the challenging issue of Housing Replacement policy implementation enabling it to simultaneously preserve the character of its neighborhoods, while ensuring continued revitalization and economic growth. L O N O B E R P R I L L E R CEO, REPLACEMENT HOUSING SERVICES CONSORTIUM LLC WWW .REPLACEMENTHOUSINGSERVICES.COM i RE REAC E M T a�re�ir� i .5 E R V I C E S C N 5 R' I U M L' C August 2007 To: The Mayor and City Council, City of Edina Re: Ordinance No. 2007 -08, An Ordinance Amending Section 850 of the City Code Regarding Setbacks and Building Height A recommendation to more equitably address the community's diverse site and neighborhood scale conditions by incorporating a progressive market indexitg capability with graduated, square footage based building standards. THE CHALLENGE: Stop overscale building without retarding housing revitalization The difficulty comes in attempting to regulate Replacement Housing in a uniform and consistent manner within a complex site /neighborhood environment that has always differed economically, topographically, and geographically. THE FIRST STEP: Define `overbuilding' in quant�flable and predictable terms Perceptions of size, scale and mass are directly affected by lot size and are typically of less concern on larger lots. Massing is a factor of overall structure size not just ground coverage, and proper assessment of it must be based upon total structure square footage and its relationship or ratio to lot square footage. Each neighborhood has normative ratios for its existing configurations. Proper calculation and use of a Total Structure Square Footage To Lot Square Footage ratio, indexed for today's new home requirements would quickly lead to a common definition and consensus on what constitutes overbuilding with an effective means for defining it. THE REPLACEMENT HOUSING SERVICES CONSORTIUM, LLC. 5200 WILLSON ROAD, SUITE 150, EDINA. MINNESOTA 55424 952.836.2665 WWW. REPLACEMENT HOUSING SERVICES.COM Most current building regulations were formulated, adopted and subsequently adapted to fit initial community development patterns. Neighborhoods were originally platted as subdivisions with common characteristics of lot size and price. Homes followed along, uniform in size, scale, mass and price through market- derived formulas largely determined by their developers /builders. This process largely accounts for the current scale and consistency of our neigh- borhoods. These formulas change with time, lifestyles and increasing wealth. Housing Replacement is second generation housing, which occurs on a level of one within various neigh- borhoods on individual sites. It is a regenerative process which, over time, changes the size, scale and r w M w 18806 NoesiNC 1850s m 18206 ICUSINs HOUSING �� a m a w • r • Housing Size Increases Over Time owarshgp • Tex Alva LXW WX Read 0 Physm stmKora �u Wme Wd app NA m "W Um am 1 -100 years mass characteristics of the homes within a neighbor - Housing's Economic Lifecycle hood. In its early stages, it is much like a child's transition from baby to permanent teeth with the same size, scale and mass conflicts. Over time these transitional inconsistencies disappear, just as they will in our neigh- borhoods. A new structure's costs and size are largely determined by its site costs. Existing structure value declines over time (physical, functional and economic obsolescence) while lot or site values actually increase. Today in many Edina neighborhoods, an existing home's physical structure is worth significantly less than the land on which it sits. For example, the average sale price of homes in the Fulton neighborhood of SW Minneapolis is approximately $334,900, with an average size of 163I finished square feet. Typical tear down costs average $230,000 plus demolition; meaning structure value is less than $100,000. Typically, Replacement Housing is priced at 3 to 4 times its site costs which in this neighborhood would be from $650- 920,000 — figures clearly representative of the Fulton neighborhood's new home offerings. r, 5255 Ewing Ave. S. $700,000 — $649,900 List Price $600,000 2,490 Fin. Sq. Ft. $500,000 5252 Chowen Ave. S. $400,000 $749,900 List Price $300,000 3,571 Fin. Sq. Ft. $200,000 5341 Abbott Ave. S. $100,000 $829,900 List Price 0 3,200 Fin. Sq. Ft 7 5044 Zenith Ave. S. $640,000 Sold Price 3,200 Fin. Sq. Ft 5229 Beard Ave. S. $735,000 Sold Price 2,800 Fin. Sq. Ft. Fulton Neighborhood's Replacement Homes: Active /Sold from 1/1/06+ This means that these new homes compete in the market not at the neighborhood average for its size, scale or price, but in the range of homes comparable to them in other neighborhoods within these higher categories. Typically they will range in size from 2700 -3800 square feet, usually on three levels and will be from 1.6 to 2.3 times larger than the average homes in their immediate vicinity. These ratios are an economic fact of life, reflecting actual costs and expenses inherent to Housing Replacement. Replacement Housing cannot economically match the size and scale of existing housing but provides a snapshot of what the neighborhood will become. All neighborhoods are not equal in terms of desir- ability, despite in many cases having similar site sizes, and thus they vary considerably in site costs. For example, a 50 foot site in the 56th and Zenith area would cost from $240 - 300,000. A similar sized site in Country Club would cost from $600- 800,000. This cost differential would require dramatically different economic building solutions for each. A home package for the 56th and Zenith area would typically be priced from $720 - I ,200,000. The one in Country Club from $1,800- 3,200,000, even though both are on approximately the same size lots. Because of their price range differences, their structure sizes would need to be considerably different to compete in their respective price categories. The house on Zenith would range from 2800 -4200 square feet while the one in Country Club would need to be $800,000 $700,000 — $600,000 $500,000 $400,000 $300,000 Al 11111 $200,000 $100,000 0 7 ; i; 7i si 13 1% A ;a W iW i Average Neighborhood Appreciation: 2000 -2006 from 4500 -6000 square feet depending on finish levels selected by their builders. These sizes are not arbitrary but are actually determined by examination of comparable houses sold recently within their respective price categories. Trying to regulate size and scale through uniform building standards without some form of market index is impossible to do equitably. Typical engineering based regula- tions fail to account for appreciation, site costs variations, neighborhood desirability and other natural market factors that determine the economics of a particular project. E . i Market Index vs Regulatory Formula MARKET FORMULA S C (Site Cost) x 3 O r 4 (NLarket Building Ratio) = M S P (Market Sale Price) M S P (Market Sale Price) F L/ P P S F = T S S (Total Structure Size) (Finish Level/ Price Per Square Foot) REGULATORY FORMULA G C R (Ground Coverage Ratio) x S (Setbacks) x H (Height) x SA (Site Area) = TSS (Total Structure Size) There is a "market disconnect" whenever straight line re gulatory standards are applied in these diverse situations. By setting size standards too low to allow for current market realities, replacement efforts are retarded, leading to the probability of eroding property values in high cost, desirable neighborhoods. The fact is: Housing Replacement activi- ties typically boost neighborhood property values. Any equitable regulatory solution for Housing Replacement must take into account these economic facts and must contain some form of site cost indexing within its formula. Doing this will link the regulation more closely to neighborhood size, scale and mass considerations, allowing much more flexibility in maintaining specific neighborhood appropriateness — recognizing that what may be appropriate for one neighborhood, may not be for another. N The mechanism for developing a neighborhood scaling formula already exists. In the marketplace each major price category can be divided into square footage /price per square foot segments. This framework can provide the basis for a normative square footage size slot for each price category /neighborhood. These slots can then be further augmented by appropriate regulation of size, ground coverage, height and setbacks etc., applicable specifically to each category (and neigh - borhood) in a scalable manner. Since it is tied to actual market conditions, this formula would be self - indexing over time, and would adjust to changes in appreciation (site costs), inflation, house size, etc. as further replacement efforts continue in our neigh- borhoods. Working out this formula and its attendant regulations would best be accomplished through a professional/ technical advisory group comprised of individuals with specific knowledge of the particular aspects involved. Lon Oberpriller President and C.E.O. The Replacement Housing Services Consortium, LLC. © 2007, Lon Oberpriller S Market Segmentation By Square Foot Southwest Minneapolis $700,000 - $800,000 2254 319 2372 2264 316 310 2600 296 2680 267 2708 266 2752 2732 271 267 2800 263 2840 268 2900 250 2913 2900 252 254 2903 260 2950 254 3060 235 3089 236 F--3-1-6-3-] 3097 252 239 3160 3224 3226 233 248 236 3226 233 . 3226 241 3388 215 3505 3483 220 219 3504. 222 357Q 220 - 3584 —220. 3767" 200' 3968 4021 187 1 189 4117 179 MEMORANDUM One of the major forces driving national Housing Replacement is traffic congestion and its associated issues of time conservation, convenience, accessibility, and increasing fuel costs. These are some of the reasons why savvy consumers are moving into close -in urban locations and either putting up or buying them with new structures more conducive to their lifestyles than the existing housing stock affords. This is a pattern that will undoubtedly increase as congestion worsens. Already, consumers are reallocating their time and dollar resources from transportation- to geographically- related priorities as time requirements lengthen and costs rise because of increasing population growth and as road construction continues to languish. This shift in priorities contributes to a clash of housing cultures caused in part by the reverse migration of suburbanites to more urban areas. Whether buyers, owners or builders, these new urban immigrants bring their ideas, taste in housing preferences, and lifestyle expectations to existing urban neighborhoods. This leads to the collision of two distinctly different bousing cultures in terms of design, size, scale, mass, features and amenities. The 'Monster House' issue tends to arise where the two intersect, leading to conflict which could ultimately shift from regulatory to discriminatory in nature. L O N O B E R P R I L L E R CEO, REPLACEMENT HOUSING SERVICES CONSORTIUM LLC WWW .REPLACEMENTHOUSINGSEP,VICES.COM U.S.News & World Report May 7, 2007 Page 42 ow C. Vk over Story • �, ; " ;� • ( � . � . + •, f . ,wii:' ,�1� � a z � '�-- -� = � .. Tie -ups. Backups �efdlock. The _ American commute has never been ,_ ° IP ..,. ■rte so painful. Is theff any solution? At • - By Will Sullivan or Kathy Kniss, staying calm while getting to and from work is about sticking to her rules. The 29- year -old publicist must be out the door of her Long Beach, Calif., home by 7:45 a.m. at the latest. Some car - choked neighbor- hoods are just off limits. When leaving her 42 therapist. But moving closer to her ogee is out of the question. "I live on the beach, and I pay the same amount for a two- bedroom that I would he paying in the middle of Los Angeles for a complete dump, she says. It's onh• about 25 miles from Kniss's office to her home, but driving to her little bit of heaven in the evenings is a grueling 75 minutes, office in Culver City, she must shut down her computer by 5:54 p.m., so she can be in her car by 6:00 to avoid the traffic buildup on side streets and make it to La Cienega Boule- vard before 6:15. Five years ago, Kniss says, commuting caused so much stn-ss that she had panic at- tacks on the road and had to see a hypno- Photography by David Butow -Redux for USNAWR meaning that, on average, her speedometer is hovering just above zero. That's on a good day, when weather, accidents, or bad luck don't interfere. "It's Murphy's Law," Kniss laments about her drive. "If something can go wrong, it %will " The status of the City of Angels as a com- muting hell is nothing new. But by 2030, ac- U S.NEWS 6 WORLD REPORT - WY. W.USNEWS.COM -MAY 7. 2007 43 cording to some estimates, driving in At- lanta, Minneapolis, and nine other urban areas will be worse than present - day Los Angeles. Nationwide, more and more people will see their roads clogged for longer periods of time. With Mayor Michael Bloomberg's rollout last week of a plan to charge hefty tolls for driving in most of Manhattan, New York became the most recent city to try to fight back. Others are investing in mass transit or high -tech traffic management. Across the country, new technology, new think- ing, and cold cash are being leveraged in aggressive efforts to combat congestion. But serious doubts linger about whether any of these plans will amount to more than a finger in the dike. People have been complaining about congestion since the time of Julius Cae- sar, who banned some traffic from down- town Rome. But in America, the 50 -year- old Interstate Highway System is showing its age, more people are on the roads, and traffic has grown dramatically worse. Americans spent 3.7 billion hours in traf- fic in 2003, the last year for which such figures are available —more than a fivefold increase from just 21 years earlier. The amount of free - flowing travel is less than half what it was in the '80s, and the av- erage commuter now loses 47 hours to congested traffic every year. Disconnect. The issue mainly boils down to population growth outpacing road building. America has about 70 mil- lion more people than it did a quarter century ago, but highway miles have in- creased by a little more than 5 percent in that time. The Department of Trans- portation estimates that the demand for ground transportation — either by road or rail —will be 21/2 times as great by 2050, while highway capacity is project- ed to increase by only 10 percent dur- ing that time. Changes in consumer behavior also ag- gravate traffic congestion. A strong econ- omy has driven car ownership to new heights; the average household now has slightly more cars, 1.9, than drivers, 1.8. High property values and restrictive zon- ing in many areas have made finding quality housing near one's workplace vir- tually impossible for many, and the quest for affordable housing has sent people to ever more- distant locales. Commuters to New York City increasingly call the Pocono Mountains of Pennsylvania, two hours away, home, while workers in Washington have streamed into Gettysburg, Pa., a full 85 miles away. Folks in places like these are considered "extreme commuters," those traveling 90 minutes or more to work every day. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, more than 3 million people —about 2.8 percent of workers —now have such commutes, a 95 percent increase from 1990. Dave Givens, 47, hits the road at 4:30 a.m. each day for a three -hour drive from his home in Mariposa. Calif., on the edge of Yosemite Nation- al Park, to his job at Cisco Sys- tems in San Jose, Calif. It's an hour before he even stops for his first coffee and picks up his carpool partner. He adds 372 miles to the odometer daily. 'It's kind of a daily mind game of what's on the radio traffic reports,' says Givens, who won first place in an "America's Longest Commute" contest run by Midas Inc. Givens says the drive is a small price to pay to live in the town his family has in- habited since the Gold Rush. And he says he enjoys the rural lifestyle. But all that driving takes a toll on a commuter's time, money, and peace of mind. David Lewis, a British scientist who studies the brain's response to stress, found that the tension commuters experience when stuck in traffic is com- parable to that felt by first -time para- chutists. Part-time New York cabdriver Sol Soloncha knows that all too well. "I'm a Buddhist," he says. "I do yoga, I prac- The new technology has given Los Angeles 44 US NEWS R WORLD REPORT • ,MWW.USNEWS COM • MAY 7, 2007 unprecedented power to respond to unusual traffic patterns. lice meditation, and weekday traffic gets so bad that even I can't keep my com- posure during it." Traffic can be more than an annoy- ance. Medical symptoms ranging from sleep deprivation to digestive problems are linked to long commutes, and a 2004 article in the New England Journal of j Medicine found that being stuck in a traffic jam more than doubles one's chance of experiencing a heart attack in the subsequent hour. Consequences. Traffic in- flicts social costs as well. Harvard public policy Prof. Robert Putnam found that community involvement falls 10 percent for every 10 min- utes spent driving to work. And leisure pursuits are casualties, too. "It sort of turns me off to have to go far to see any sort of entertain- ment or any arts, or even to go to the beach; says Donald Pierce of Granada Hills, Calif. "Any good day at the beach, there's going to be a lot of traffic." SWAM. u Major improvement in traffic congestion not only re- quires massive government THE intervention but also involves Mean tra getting all political forces on the same page. And that can 1. Rich 2. Quee be an insurmountable hurdle. Brom In V of fierce 1 3. Bro ��'�� �- 4. King islative battling over who should foot the bill for traf- 5. Prin fic relief in heavily congest- S. Mc ed Northern Virginia finally 1. McH resulted in a compromise be- 8. Will tween Gov. Tim Kaine and 9. Oran antitax Republican legislators 11. Mon in April. The bill authorizes IL Mo $3 billion in borrowing for 12. Mon statewid a improvements, 13. Cook such as widening highways 14. Cook and improving rail service, 14. Phil and lets car- choked regions 14.Ocea raise taxes and fees for local 17.Ocea projects. But even backers urged Virginians not to set their hopes too high, with a Republican state Senate leader calling the bill "one of the ugliest bastard stepchildren" to pass the Senate. Some cities, including Houston (box, Page 48), have embarked on aggressive programs of road building, trying to stay ahead of their swelling populations. But significantly increasing capacity is just not feasible for metropolitan areas with high population densities. Building more roads in places like Chicago or Philadelphia would involve either lev- eling buildings or tunneling -an option li that is now virtually unthinkable after Boston's troubled, and fabulously ex- pensive, Big Dig project. Even when new roads are built, they are often quickly filled to the point of congestion by driv- ers who previously traveled at other times, took other roads, or used public 1 transportation, says Brookings Institu- Charlotte, N.C., will unveil the first of what is expected to be a five -line rail sys- tem in November, joining cities like Salt Lake City and Dallas, whose low popu- lation densities don't make them obvi- ous candidates for rail. Perhaps most surprisingly, Los Ange- les, where driving is almost a religion, is undergoing a veritable transit boom, fu- riously digging new subway tunnels and expanding a rapid bus system that will tr-U., THE 10 WORST COMMUTER CITIES Mean travel time to work in minutes *Sim Francisco.- 28.7 Los Angeles: 29.6 1 •Rivenkle: 29.3 rig Beack 28.8 Boston: 30.4 �1lo York 39.1 `o: 11mrk 3l�•� Mdelphia:31.9 f Waftillom 29.3 / S c"tW Slew 2005 Ws by a ucn raaWan WORST COUNTIES vel time to work in minutes mond County, N.Y.* .......42.0 1 18. Clayton County, Ga ................31.7 ns County, N.Y.` ...........41.8 1 19. Riverside County, Calif. .........31.6 By 2030, the traffic in these areas is projected to be worse than Los Angeles's today. Major cities' population in 2030 fin millions) Los Angeles -Lang Beach_- 15.65 Chicago ........ ........................... 9.52 Washington ...._ ....................... L97 San Francisco - Oakland ..........4.97 Atlanta .... .......... .......... _......... 5.01 Miami ............. .. ........ ..... _........ 7.55 Denver -Aurora ................. _ ..... 3.21 Seattle- Tacoma. Wash . .......... 3.96 Las Vegas ... _._ .......................1.83 Minneapolis-.St. Paul _ ............ 3.37 Baltimore ... .............. _ ............. 2.44 Portland, Ore ...........................L51 35. Fort Bend County, Texas........ 30.0 36. Norfolk County, Mass............ 29.8 37. Cobb County, Ga ...................29.7 38. Rockland County, N.Y ...... _....29.5 39. San Joaquin County, Calif..... 29.4 39. Somerset County, NJ .............29.4 41. District of Columbia" .......... 29.3 41.OuPage County, III .................29.3 43. Solano County, Calif .............. 212 44. Snohomish County, Wash...... 29.1 45. Los Angeles County, Calif...... 29.0 46. Rockingham County, N.H... _ 28.8 46. Pierce County, Wash .............. 28.8 48. San Francisco County, Calif.... 28.7 48. Baltimore, Md." ..................28.1 50. Kane County, 11) . ................ _..26.6 50. Morris County, NJ .................28.6 t ae. Yai GbraRna BianL h�l9d coe4 Csx7 ai -CAM nM.0 b rerresert nm rase. For more coverage of America's traffic crisis: www.usnews.com/roadwarrtors/ tion traffic expert Anthony Downs. With that in mind, more cities are looking to enhance public transportation options. In January, Denver opened new lines that more than doubled the miles covered by its light rail system, to 33. By 2017, the city hopes to have laid down 119 miles of track and 18 miles of bus rapid transit, at a cost of $4.7 billion. let buses zoom down their own desig- nated lanes. Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa is pushing hard for his dream of a "sub- way to the sea," a Metro line running under the notoriously jammed Wilshire Boulevard. "This city will one day have a world -class transportation system, peri- od," he proclaims. There is cause for optimism. Less than U.S.NEWS 6 WORLD REPORT • W%VW.USNEVJS.COM • MAY 7. 2007 45 18 months after the October 2005 open- ing of the city's Orange Line —a high- speed bus line using an old railroad right of way to avoid traffic — ridership had reached the city's 2020 projections. And unlike nearly every other city, Los An- geles drivers spend less time in traffic now than they did a decade ago, thanks to both mass transit and aggressive traf- fic management. Cover Story rather than just slowing its growth, would require funding "that has hereto- fore been unprecedented. I'm talking about ... tens of billions of dollars and beyond." That's in Los Angeles alone. The prohibitive cost of alleviating gridlock is one factor behind the De- partment of Transportation's new con- gestion initiative, announced last year. The department hopes to partner with crowded urban areas. Such systems are already in place in London (box, below) and Singapore, but Bloomberg's pro- posed $8 charge for daytime driving in Manhattan, assessed using E -ZPass tech- nology and cameras, would be a first for America. In announcing his push for tolling, Bloomberg conceded that he had once been a skeptic himself but said he had come to see it as necessary. The proposal faces an up- hill battle in the state Legisla- ture. Trucking unions are al- ready griping because trucks would be charged a whopping $21 for entering Manhattan, and politicians in the city's America has about 70 million more people than it did a quarter But experts are skeptical that public transportation offers a real solution to congestion problems. In the 2000 cen- sus, just 4.7 percent of people said they used public transit to get to work, and transit represents only 2 percent of daily trips in Southern California. In most cities, even if the percentage of trips using transit tripled, which is not likely, the resulting drop in congestion would be overwhelmed by the projected growth in population. And it would no doubt be extraordinarily expensive. Villaraigosa estimates that a public transit system that would seriously reduce congestion, century a but highw miles have increased little more than 5 per in that tim cities to show the usefulness of charging tolls based on the level of congestion, raising the price during rush hour to deter some commuters from traveling during peak times. DOT believes this would keep highways near capacity with- out descending into gridlock, and in- crease the number of cars able to travel on a road daily by 40 percent. "What we are trying to do is push states to be as ag- gressive as they can be," says Trans- portation Secretary Mary Peters. Cordons. That includes encouraging the implementation of "cordon tolls," which would charge drivers for entering A NEW IDEA ACROSS THE POND ONDON —Home to a major financial district, bustling shopping venues, and numerous tourist attractions, central London is a daily destination for millions of commuters and visitors. It's also a war- ren of narrow streets chock - ablock with pedestrians and vehicles. Not surprisingly, gridlock often results. London Mayor Ken Liv- ingstone's solution: a conges- tion- charge zone. In 2003, with the support of the busi- ness community, he sur- rounded 8 square miles of central London with traffic cameras and began charging 46 U- S.NEWS 6 WORLD REPORT . WWW USNEWSZOM • MAY 7, 2007 gouter boroughs are unmoved O! by the mayor's pledge to in- ay crease public transit to com- pensate for the charge. DOT Secretary Peters con- cedes that cordon tolling is not 3y palatable in most ycities and that perhaps the most realistic option is so- called HOT lanes, converted carpool lanes where drivers cent willing to pay a variable fee can ride with carpools and buses. Though often derided e. as "Lexus lanes" for the wealthy, they have proved ef- fective in several states as a means of let- ting those willing to pay avoid gridlock. In Minnesota, which opened its first HOT lanes in 2005, drivers in the lanes travel at an average speed of 50 miles per hour 95 percent of the time. But HOT lanes lack the major benefit of other tolling options for reducing congestion; since people can still use the untolled lanes free, the lanes don't discourage drivers from hitting the road during peak hours, limiting congestion re- lief. And even congressional Republicans who preach limited government are skep- tical that market forces are enough to bust the nation's bottlenecks. cars and trucks about $16 a day to enter. The cameras photograph the vehicles and match license plates against payments made in advance. Results. Daily traffic into central London fell by 20 per- cent (70,000 fewer vehicles). Emissions were cut about 15 percent. Average speeds inched up from 8.5 mph to 10 mph. And last year, the fee generated some $212 million in profits, which funded bet- ter bus services. In February, the zone was doubled in size to the west to include such wealthy residen- tial enclaves as Kensington and Notting Hill. This time, however, support is thinner. Lauren Preteceille, a business group spokesperson, calls the extension an inefficient "blunt instrument." Critics fear the enlarged zone could erode the The DoT's plan also encourages states to follow a growing trend of seek- ing private financing for building or managing roads. An Australian- Span- ish consortium paid $1.8 billion for a 99-year lease of the Chicago Skyway in 2004, and a number of states have inked long -term leases of toll roads or are considering it. Both the New Jersey and Pennsylvania turnpikes could go on the auction block soon. However, both the American Auto- mobile Association and t I gains incluc (who . cent d w ithlz pie pr inal u but nc discos centiv Londe admit increase by 5 percent but leasing highways, and previous leases have sometimes borne out their con- cerns. The deals often forbid government to build roads that would compete with the private toll road. After selling a pri- vate company the right to operate HOT lanes on the Riverside Freeway for $120 million in the late'SOs, officials in Or- ange County, Calif., had to buy them in 2003 for more than $200 million to make improvements on the road's un- tolled lanes. In Indiana, the Republican ,,, _ „, o .1— -1 loss of its House ma- The C denotes a charge zone. jority in November was blamed in part on Gov. Mitch Daniels's unpopular 75 -year lease of the Indiana Toll Road, which led to a toll hike. There is certainly a strongly held be- lief in this country that roads are for the public benefit ... and that they are free.” says Bill Graves, the president of the AT A and former governor of Kansas. With few appealing options, many traffic experts suggest that the growth of congestion is inevitable. That might not be the end of the world, says traffic expert Downs. To remain efficient and prosperous, people largely have to be traveling to the same places at the same claim west London conges- tion will ease by 15 to 22 per- cent. But at what cost? Some analysts say west London businesses more reliant on driving customers may see their own sales fall. Pay -to -drive plans contin- ue to gain traction, however. Voters in Stockholm ap- proved a congestion fee last September, and those in Manchester, England, will vote on one soon. Britain is also cons"tdering a national system of toll roads. A BBC survey found that 74 percent of Britons oppose road charges, though 55 percent say they could back a plan if money collected helped im- prove public transportation. Few drivers like paying tolls. But many suspect that traffic jams are a more costly op- tion. - Thomas A. Grose U.S.NEWS d WORLD REPORT • WWW.USNEWS.COM • MAY ', :Oil7 47 times of day. Traffic is sim- ply the equivalent of waiting in line. Downs contends that only a serious economic downturn —such as the one that sent congestion plum- meting in Silicon Valley after the tech bubble burst —can reverse the cycle of rising congestion. That doesn't mean gov- ernment is helpless. Many cities are looking to Los An- geles for lessons in how to slow traffic's growth. To avoid blockages, the city has stopped road construction during rush hour, stiffened penalties for parking illegal- ly, and deploys a roaming fleet of tow trucks to quick- ly clear stalled or damaged cars off the freeways. Tech fix. New technology also gives the city an edge. Its Automated Traffic Sur- veillance and Control sys- tem uses sensors buried in the road to measure traffic flow and can automatically adjust 3,400 of the city's 4,400 traffic lights to ease congestion. The system can, for ex- ample, extend a green light for a bus that is behind schedule or an emer- gency vehicle rushing to an accident. At its high -tech command center, buried four stories under City Hall East in downtown Los Angeles, ATSAC opera- tors can view bottlenecks from hun- dreds of cameras throughout the city and make their own adjustments. Cover Story The system has given Los Angeles un- precedented power to respond to un- usual traffic patterns, from the Academy Awards to the 1994 earthquake that col- lapsed key sections of the city's freeway system. And the city is hoping to use some of its share of California's recently approved $19.9 billion transportation bond —the largest bond in state history — to link the remaining lights to ATSAC. The city has most likely shaved min- utes off its frustrated citizens' com- Houston is trying to take a broader approach. city, the answer has been roads, roads, and more roads. At least until now. Houston's traffic has reflected the city's boom- and -bust cycle; congestion actually diminished during the oil bust of the 1980s and picked up again when oil prices and business began to boom mutes, but such measures can go only so far. Each morning and evening, de- spite all their efforts, ATSAC operators still watch freeways clog and Wilshire Boulevard turn as suffocating as the La Brea Tar Pits it runs beside. "We're mixing out what our roads are able to do," says John Fisher, assistant gener- al manager of the Los Angeles Depart- ment of Transportation. How bad can traffic in American cities get? Los Angeles's long -range trans- again in the late 1990s. Starting in 2000, traffic w•as Houstonians' top concern for six straight years in an annual poll con- ducted by Rice University Prof. Stephen lineberg. By 2004, congestion had grown so bad that it actually inspired Houston's current mayor, Bill White, to run for office. He won, in part, on a promise to get Houston moving. The area's regional planning body went to work, and the result, in 2005, was the Houston - Galveston Regional Transporta- tion 2025 Plan, which called for a 78 per- cent increase in lane capacity to cope with the expected addition of 3 million resi- dents to the metropolitan area over the next three decades. The $65 billion price tag was to be paid through state and fed- eral funds, local bond issues, transit fares, tolls, car registration fees, and tares. Unlike their counterparts in nearly every other city, Los Angeles drivers spend less time in traffic now than they did a decade ago. portation plan is a grim look at the fu- ture. By 2025, Los Angeles County is projected to have 3 million more people, which could prompt a 30 percent in- crease in car trips. At that rate, the report suggests, "congestion will last nearly all daylong." None of the city s in- novative solutions —from new subway lines to traffic management systems — are likely to change that. And at the rate traffic in other cities is snarling, they won't be far behind. • Since then, though, the mood has changed, thanks to public hearings, mu- nicipal soul- searching, and Houston's lack of compliance with the Clean Air Act. Mayor White is pushing a multipronged approach — retiming traffic lights, for in- stance, and instituting a Safe Clear pro- gram to move stalled or crashed vehicles immediately. Last year, he enlisted area CEOs in a trial of flextime hours to reduce rush hour. Next year, Houston will add to its fledgling light rail system. And the 2025 plan is now slated to be replaced this summer by a new plan, 2035. It will reflect the broader approach as well, with a focus on more mass transit and redevel- opment projects inside the area's major beltway. "It's a case study," says Klineberg, "in a city coming to grips with the 21st century'." -Carol Flake Chapman MEMORANDUM REP CAC E M � T rUn�Tll-' .i C It �' I C[ S C (� N i C This article illustrates the dfficulty of securing human consensus for change of any type. Housing Replacement is typical of this because it brings physical change to the built world, transforming the known or familiar to the unknown which often provokes objections based upon fear of, and resistance to change. Edina has been experiencing Housing Replacement from at least the late 1980s. Only recently has it become a contentious community issue. Diverse media exposure has raised public awareness of the issue and provided the nucleating lexicon of the Wonster House, creating the catalyst for crystallizing and mobilizing opposition around concerns of size, scale and mass and conversely, to Housing Replacement efforts in general while largely ignoring its much more important and beneficial aspects. The challenge for civic leaders then is in raising public awareness of the importance of Housing Replacement to the long term vitality and well being of the community and of the necessity of accepting reasonable physical change in the accomplishment of this objective. L O N O B E R P R I L L E R CEO, REPLACEMENT HOUSING SERVICES CONSORTIUM LLC WWW .REPLACEMENTHOUSINGSERVICES.COM Monastery's plans are raising Cain • Advocates of the shelter and housing project in Maplewood say the fears can be put to rest. Star Tribune Sunday, Maay 6, 2007 Section B, page 1 By MARY LYNN SMITH mismith@startribunexom For more than 40 years, scores of Benedictine nuns lived a quiet monastic existence in Maplewood largely unnoticed — until they re- cently decided to downsize. Now neighbors are raising a ruck- us over the nuns' plans to move out of St. Paul's Monastery, which is too big for their dwindling numbers, and make way for an emergency shelter for women and children and afford- able housing for seniors and families. A standing -room crowd jammed a Maplewood Planning Commission meeting on the issue in March, and city officials expect an even larger KYNDEU HARRNESS • tharlmess @startnbum.cam Sister Sharon of the St. Paul Monastery stopped to chat about new plans for the Benedictines' land and building. They are hoping to make better use of their land and perty by offering units to seniors and low income families and a shelter for women and children. Monastery plans upset Maplewood neighborhood MONASTERY FROM BI About 100 residents have submit- ted a petition opposing the develop- ment, saying they are concerned that the project will result in increasing traffic, decreasing property values and rising crime. Organizers of the opposition didn't return phone calls, but their petition points out that 1,000 stu- dents are enrolled in the nearby Hill- Murray School and that the neigh- borhood includes "young and not so young women who enjoy walking in the evening or early morning." "How responsible will you feel on the day we learn that one of us, a stu- dent or neighbor, has become a vic- dm[ ?]," the petition asks. Randy Schubring, a spokesman for the Tubman Family Alliance, which will own and manage the shelter, said his agency will work with neighbors to develop a security system. But he said that he doesn't anticipate many problems. Neighbors, he said, "are con- cerned that abusers will try to find their spouses. Criminals don't go to police stations and abusers don't go to shelters." Administrators at Hill- Murray School, which is next door to the 30- acre monastery grounds, also have lobbied against the proposal. But while school officials long have eyed the monastery's property as a way to expand their 40 -acre campus, Hill- Murray President Joseph Peschges said their concerns about the project are focused on increased traffic. The school recently spent $300,000 to build an access road to relieve some of the congestion caused by students and parents, he said. B feaz . The monastery's administra- - tors say they understand the neigh- bors' concerns. "It's mostly a fear of the unknown," said Jean Hartman, the monastery's director of finance and administration. But the nuns, who will build a smaller monastery on the property, say they can dispel those worries. For instance, they say, the women who stay in the 64 -bed shelter likely won't have cars, and very few seniors living in the 40 apartments would drive. Most of the "working class" people who would rent the 50 afford- able townhomes probably would use mass transit. St. Paul Park residents were appre- hensive about increased crime when the Tubman agency opened a 34 -bed shelter in a former church rectory more than a decade ago, said St. Paul Park Mayor John Hunziker. "But we haven't gotten one complaint," he said. "I would tell [Maplewood residents] not to be concerned." City Council Member Erik Hjelle said he's not sure what stand the council will take on the project. In addition to increased traffic, Hjelle said, he's concerned that shelter and affordable housing residents will de- mand more police and emergency services than their neighbors, while paying less in taxes. "The sad thing is that the shelter and [affordable housing] is needed," he said. "How can you say no to what they're going to accomplish ?" Council Member Will Rossbach believes the council really can't say no because the development, which the Maplewood Planning Commis- sion unanimously approved, meets city requirements. "I don't want to brush off peo- ple's concerns. They should be ad- dressed," Rossbach said. But the "stacks and stacks" of research he has reviewed show that the devel- opment won't increase traffic signif- icantly, crime won't go up and prop- erty values won't go down. he said. CHANGE OF HABITAT) The Benedictine sisters at St. Paul's Monastery in Maplewood are planning a monastery about one -third the sue of their current 100,000 - square -foot home. They plan to convert the old monas- tery into an emergency shelter for women and children, and also build 90 affordable housing units. Shelter: The Tubman Fam- ily Alliance is planning to open a shelter in 2010 with 64 beds, administrative offices, licensed daycare and offices for other programs - Senior Housing: Common - Bond Communities is planning to open 40 rental units in 2009 for older residents with incomes from $14,000 to $20,000. Family Townhomes. Com- monBond also plans 50 units with one -car, tuck -under garages in 2009. Resident income: about $39,000. MARY LYNN SMITii "You get a few people who are afraid of something and then they start making things up ... and then they go tell their neighbors," he said. Whether it's converting open space into a city park, connect'ng cul de sacs with a trail or building af- fordable housing, people don't like change, Rossbach said. "People don't want other people next to them," he said. "I can't be- lieve how afraid of one another we are. Our society is a mess." Nuns on a mission The Benedictine nuns opened St. Paul's Monastery in 1965, but only af- ter Archbishop Leo Binz requested that they first build a high school for girls — Archbishop Murray Memo- rial High School, which merged with Hill School in 1971. The monastery's ranks grew to more than 200, although no more than about 100 nuns have ever lived there at anf one time. Membership now totals 58, with 38 nuns living in the sprawling 100,000 - square -foot poured concrete monastery. The nuns say that they could have sold their property to a developer for a lot of money. Under the property's current zoning, more than 400 units could be built. "It's not about the money," said Sister Carol Rennie, the monastery's prioress. "It's about our mission to serve women, children and seniors. A lot of working people can't afford housing." When the nuns pitched their idea for an emergency shelter to Tubman Family Alliance, "It was like a mir- acle," said Schubring, the agency's spokesman. "It fits our purpose like a glove.... There's a real spiritual feel to it when you go through it." Officials at nonprofit Common - Bond Communities, which will build and manage the senior and family af- fordable housing project at the mon- astery, have faced similar opposition in other cities. "Those people" who critics say they don't want in their neighbor- hoods are working families, said El- len Higgins, CommonBond's vice president of development for Com- monbond. "They are bank tellers who hand you money, sales people who check out your groceries, teaching assis- tants who teach your kids," she said. "They are nurses' aides, school bus drivers and firefighters. They are you. They are living in your commu- nity now" Mary Lynn Smith • 651 - 29&1550 5 Maplewood Oakdale .35 miles ScUce:ESRLTeIeAtL,s StatTnbu e The St. Paul Monastery, left, where a community of Benedictine women has lived for more than 40 years. ... Sr. PACT_ . N, St. Pan' gE' Map 94, r area d. A 35E V a , - HM -Murray z + •shoal larpenteur Av. St. Paul's Monastery 5 Maplewood Oakdale .35 miles ScUce:ESRLTeIeAtL,s StatTnbu e The St. Paul Monastery, left, where a community of Benedictine women has lived for more than 40 years. MEMORANDUM The winds of change are starting to blow on the Housing Replacement issue. This article is d fferent from previous ones about the `McMansion' or'Monster House' debate. While still featuring the hand - wringing homeowner living in the smaller house, it also presents other perspectives on the issue. Notably, Myron Orfield area resident and activist talking about its tax generation capability and the city's dire need of it. It also profiles a resident choosing to rebuild in order to stay in the neigh- borhood as well as a builder actively seeking community support and consensus for his project. These diverse perspectives show that Housing Replacement is rapidly emerging from a one - issue, `Monster House' debate into a larger multi - dimensional one — with increasing focus on its benefits and advantages. This changes the dialogue to one with a more balanced and reasoned approach as members of the community begin to consider its positive aspects rather than just its negatives. L O N O B E R P R I L L E R CEO, REPLACEMENT HOUSING SERVICES CONSORTIUM LLC WWW .REPLACEMENTHOUSINGSERVICES.COM Star Tribune Friday, June 29, 2007 Section B, page 1 MINDING THOSE MANORS Photos by MARLIN LMSON • mkvis=@stutnhwe.com Some smaller houses in the Linden Hills neighborhood are being razed to make room for larger ones, a development that has irked some folks. After hearing complaints, the Minneapolis City Council will vote today on whether to approve new restrictions limiting the size of new houses. An issue for the city: one owner's castle can be another owner's shadow. Dorothy Delegard, who has lived in the Linden Hills neighborhood for nearly 30 years, is concerned about the suburban-style homes sprouting in the area and supports the proposed ordinance. HOUSE FROM 111 "It's a very electric issue in )th neighborhoods. There isn't any middle ground on it," id John Finlayson. He heads 11ton7s neighborhood group, sits on the city board that con- fers zoning variances and is a ..011sing appraiser. Although parts of Lin - -n Hills near Lakes Harri- et and Calhoun sprouted larg- houses more than a centu- ago, much of the two neigh - horhoods filled in with more odest houses — either dur- ing in the 1920s boom or after "Forld War II, when housing :mand exploded. That has left some houses ce Delegard's, which mea- . ares just more than 800 °'luare feet, with two bedrooms 1d one bathroom. Finlayson has neighboring homes of on- 600 square feet. He admits iat some older homes aren't much to look at, but said that tme builders are snapping mem up, then pumping their :placements as big as they to to maximize profit That means houses that trade the yards of their neigh - .,jrs. In one case, Finlayson "lid a new Beard Avenue :)use is built so close to its neighbor that he doubts iere's enough clearance be- _ .veen them to put up a ladder for maintenance. %Am and take an the issue Some call the proposal a endless attempt to enforce a uniformity on an area that al- �ady has much variation in ..ousing sizes and style. "One equation doesnt ork," said Todd Shipman, a former president of the Minne- .�oolis Area Association of Re- .tors. "One blanket approach does not work for every Mm- By STEVE BRANDT • sbrandt@starbibune com r orothy Delegard says she holds her breath every time a for - sale sign sprouts near her tiny Linden Hills home a block in- side Minneapolis. 4 "I think a lot of the neighbors are con- cerned every time a house comes up for sale,' said elegant 65,, who has lived in her boxy green stucco home since 1978. That's because super -sized homes are springing up on many of the area lots where existing homes have been purchased and razed. She sees the impact just a block away, on Drew Avenue, where five homes bigger than typ- ical for the block are under con- struction or recently completed. Linden Hills and the adjacent Fulton neighborhood are the epi- center of the issue, which some suburban city councils are start ing to address, too. Today, the Minneapolis City Council is scheduled to vote on city-wide restrictions, proposed by area Council Member Betsy Hodges, which are designed to throttle back the size of such housing. The changes were ap- proved unanimously by the coun- cil's committee on zoning. House cont;anes: No middle ground seen on issue. 37 MARLIN LEVISON • mL—nwn @startribune.mm New houses, such as this one under construction on Drew Avenue S. in Linden Hills, have residents worried about losing the traditional look of the neighborhood. Some folks say the new houses look too suburban Yet, the larger structures represent increases in taxable value for the city. neapolis neighborhood." Myron Orfield, an expert in metro affairs whose family has lived on the same Linden Hills block for 100 years, said he un- derstands the impulse to keep gentrification from pricing a neighborhood beyond reach. But with its state -aid cut and burden of poverty, Orfield said, Minneapolis can ill-afford to pass up the property tax gain that big houses represent For example, a new two-sto- ry Italianate house on Chowen Avenue, which popped up be- tween two one -story hip- roofed houses, represents an eightfold increase in taxable value over its smaller predecessoL But those are the contrasts that bother Delegard, who de- scribes some of the new hous- ing as too suburban for the city. "They ought to fit in so they don't stick out from everything else," she said. She marveled over the size of the pit for one house that just broke ground on Drew. But then Lisa Elliott walked by with two kids in tow. She lives four doors from Delegard, and her family will occupy the new place. She assured Delegard that the pit is oversized merely so that equipment can install pil- ings for stability in the area's peaty soil. In fact, her family's home was designed to fit within the size and mass restrictions of the proposed ordinance. "I'm all for [the ordinance]," she assured Delegard. The house will be 2,630 square feet, more than triple Delegard's_ but still 20 percent smaller than the proposed changes would allow. The family has lived in Lin- den Hills for nearly 12 years, and looked for a roomier place in the area for three years with- out finding one that wouldn't require a six -figure renova- tion. With a son enrolled to start kindergarten next fall a couple of blocks away at Lake Harriet school, they're breaking ground now. No rush to beat deadlines Hodges' office said a surge of housing starts intended to beat the restrictions hasn't materi- Meamvhile, some builders like Doug Erickson work on adapting existing housing. He's roughly doubling the size of a Drew Avenue rambler in a way that actually leaves more yard space than before. "I want to separate myself from the subur- ban builders. I ve always tried to HOW BIG CAN IT BE? The proposed limits on single-family and two - family housing size to be considered by the Minne- apolis City Council today generally: • Cower the height limit from 35 to 30 feet, or 2% stories, whichever is lower. • Limit a house's floor area to half of the square footage of the lot, or 2,500 square feet, whichever is more. Features such as open porches, marry base- ' merits and attics, and de- tached garages wouldn't count in this calculation A house already over the iunit could e3tpandby 500 square feet in any 15 -year pew • Hold the footprint of the house and other struc- tures to 50 percent or less ° - ofthe kit. • Keep the hard surface of a lot,which includes sidewalks and driveways, to 65 percent or less of lot area. Some exceptions would be permitted if enough nearby existing homes already exceed the limits. .. Property owners also could seek variances from these limits. STEVEBRANDT For updates onthe coun- cil vote this moming on "big house" lirnits, go to StaYfnbune.com. R fit i4" said Erickson, who lives eight blocks away. "The people who started the [anti]-monster -house campaign came over and loved it," he said. Steve Brandt • 612. 673 -4138 MEMORANDUM K E LA E M 'k.�' ' T R I U o iA�l J�Iy L Il � 1: l These two articles speak to aging and population growth demographics — two dynamics which will significantly affect future housing development patterns and formulas. Attention to both are necessary for a community to ffectively compete for residents and maintain continuous relevance and vitality. These articles underscore the need for pro - active planning, and creative strategies to attract and maintain residents in a challenging, more competitive environment which offers them greater lifecycle choices and options. For example, Edina's present ground coverage ratios handicap efforts to build one floor homes on smaller lots with the necessary square footage, features and amenities required for lifestyle pr ferences of today's aging population. This literally forces most building to be of a two -story configuration necessary to provide the square footage the market demands at a particular price point. This policy also contributes to height complaints and should be reviewed for its continued applicability and relevance. L O N O B E P P R [ L L E R CEO. REPLACEMENT HOUSING SERVICES CONSORTIUM LLC WWW .REPLACEMENTHOUSINGSERV[CES.COM Turbs to be hit with senior boom • Once full of families, suburbs look at ways to adapt to the needs of aging citizens. By DAVID PETERSON • dapeterson @startribune.com A "senior tsunami" headed for the nation's suburbs will make them older than the cities they surround and change them in fundamen- tal ways, according to an analysis released to- day by a leading demographer. And the Twin Cities region is one of the met- ropolitan areas facing the greatest change be- cause rts3-Ntnts tend to stay, said William Frey of the Brookings Institution in Washington. "Suburbs, which previously were considered youthful and family - friendly parts of America, will ... become a fast - graying part of our nation- al landscape," he wrote. In the next decade, the Frey report shows, the surge in America's seniors will grow at a rate of nearly 36 percent. That rate is four times faster than the popu- lation as a whole. Suburbs continues: Seniors' needs change. AS ► KYNDELLHARKNESS • kharimess @startnbune.com Lucille Ahles joked with driver Charles Norwood as she used the lift on the bus after shopping at Cub Foods in Robbinsdale. Star Tribune Tuesday, June 12, 2007 Section A; page 1 A senior boom will hit Y_ man suburbs hard SUBURBS FROM Al In fast -gro The report underscores a strategy that officials in the Twin Cities have taken to urge communities to understand the services an aging popula- tion might require, and, adapt to the needs of older residents who might prefer walling trails over ball fields, or con- certs over cards. "There are dramatic chang- es in the kinds of places peo- ple want to be taken to," said Rita DeBruyn, coordinator of the Five Cities Senior Trans- portation Program, covering suburbs from Golden Valley to Brooklyn Center. "Twenty years ago, it was subsidized se- nior dining, or card clubs. We'd have 100 people a day gather- ing to play cards. "Today they want to go to Panera Bread. We don't even do `senior dining.' And instead of card clubs, it's Westminster Town Hall Forum, or MacPhail for concerts. They want to be intellectually stimulated." Already, older Twin Cities suburbs such as St. Anthony and Edina rank among Min- nesota's graying farm towns and northern - lakes" retire- ment communities for their high percentage of seniors — roughly one in four residents is 65 and older. Change is coming to newer suburbs as well. wmg Dako- ta County, home to such kid - loud suburbs as Lakeville and Farmington, there are today as many elementary age chil- dren as senior residents. But in the next 15 years, Minneso- ta's state demographer report- ed Friday, the numbers of res- idents 65 and older will grow 14 times faster than those aged 5 to 9. Seniors will outnumber children by 2 to L In Eden Prairie, Cheryl Wei- ler remembers when hers was the only house on the block without kids. Sixteen years lat- er, she reports, it's becoming a much different place. "Half the homes are emp- ty nests;' she said. "People are moving to town homes. The kids are gone. And who's mov- ing in? With home pries what they are, it's not always young families. Half the kids who re- main will graduate in the nest six years. Our community is ag- ing! Who would have thought of Eden Prairie as an aging community? " The "tsunami" to which Frey refers — an unprecedented tid- al wave of aging residents — is even being found in exurban counties beyond close -in sub- urbs in large metropolitan ar- eas, he said. Counties outside Denver, Atlanta, Washington and Dallas are leading the trend, he said. Although the notion of a KYNDELL HARKNESS • kharkness@startribune.com Bus driver Charles Norwood chatted with Agnes Olson as he carried her groceries to her Robbinsdale home. He drives for Five Cities Senior Transportation, which offers rides to seniors for various outings. GRAYING'BURBS Top 10 Twin Cities suburbs', percentage of residents age 65 and over: 1. Edina ... ............................23% 2. Roseville ._......_..........._..20 3. Golden Valley..__.._......20 4. West St Paul- _.._..__.._.19 soon -to-be-aging America is nothing new, Frey concludes that the aging of baby boom- ers will cause suburbs of cit- ies such as Chicago and Los Angeles to become "consider- ably older than the cities them- selves by 2040 Minnesota, Frey reports, is still by Midwestern standards an island of youth in a sea of gray hair. Thanks to the stable S. Columbia Heights ....... ..19 6. New Hope ................. _ ..... 18 7. Robbinsdale ...................18 S. Richfield ..._... ............... ..16 9. Bloomington ................... 16 10. Brooklyn Center ........... 15 'with populations 10,000 and over Source: 2000 census influence of the Twin Cities, Minnesota is much younger than neighboring states such as Iowa and North Dakota, which have been exporting 20 -some- things for decades. Tbat's about to change, too. "Places like Minnesota, or the Sun Belt, that have been succgssful in attracting ba- by boomers because of their economies or climates are THE APPROACHING 'SENIOR TSUNAMI' As Baby Boomers hit their retirement years, the number of seniors is about to explode — in seemingly youthful suburbs no less than in other American settings, a new study says. Growth rate by decade for seniors and all Americans 35% 35.8% 30 Age 65+ ` 26.3% 30.8% 25 %, 20 15 31.896 10 04s._ Tom 1 &3% 0 1970s; 19905 1 20108 1 19805 2000s 2020s Source: William Frey, Brookings Institution poised now to have some rapid 'aging in place,"' he said. Even as Brookings was re- leasing copies of the Frey study, the Minnesota League of Cities late last week was send- ing a mass e-mail to the state's city halls, asking public offi- cials to supply details of how they're "preparing for an aging demographic base" as fuel for a 2008 documentary film meant to share ideas. And the Metropolitan Coun- cil has been reminding suburbs that they need to be thinking about re- engineering them- selves for older residents as they submit their 10 -year plan- ning documents due next year. Many cities didn't need the hint. School districts worry about support for self- imposed tax hikes for schools — espe- cially in an era when seniors remain generally white while the kids increasingly are immi- grants from Africa or Mexico. Parks planners are thinking less about ball fields and more about walling trails. At the same time, suburban leaders are reacting to a shift in the services seniors want. Experts agree that retrofit- ting suburbs for seniors — as Edina for instance has been planning, with a Southdale area whose streets today are dangerous to cross — will be a tricky task, because they were built for cars. "But if a community meets the needs of older people," said Hal Freshley, of the Min- nesota Board of Aging, "it al- so meets the needs of kids who don't drive yet, or parents with strollers. It's pretty much just good design." And in fact, he added, it will be seniors overseeing the change. "I was addressing a lo- cal group in Greater Minnesota one day on aging, and sudden- ly looked around the room and noticed that every local elect- ed official was at least 60 years old. I felt like an idiot talking to them about aging. "There are some absolute- ly dynamic, cool, groovy, fun communities that have a high proportion of older people:' David Peterson • 612 - 673 -4440 Star Tribune Thursday, June 28, 2007 Section B, page 1 It's in the numbers: 2 cities' populations creeping up • Minneapolis is seeing again in population after years of declining numbers. And Rochester will soon hit the 100,000 mark. By DAVID PETERSON dapeterson@startribune.com Two Minnesota cities get a big psy- chological boost from the latest round of population estimates being issued today by the federal government. Minneapolis, for the first time in years, gets counted among the American cities that are gaining population, instead of losing. And Rochester is galloping to- ward a major symbolic threshold: the 100,000 mark. "It'swery important to cities to be 'growing,' not 'declining, "' even if the difference is relatively mod- est, said the nation's highest - profile demographer, William Frey, of the Washington -based Brookings Insti- tution. "And for most cities, 100,000 is the floor for getting any kind of national attention." In fact, city officials in Rochester say it's more than symbolic. "In our business," said Brad Jones, head of the city's convention bureau, "a lot of people won't even look at communities under 100,000 when it comes time to choose a site for con- ventions and sporting events. Census continues: The biggest gain- er? Hugo, from 2005 to 2006. B7 ► bENNEAPOUS TURNS A CORNER After claiming year- after -year declines in the city's population for at least the past two decades, the U.S. Census Bureau reports today that things are turning around. Here's a look at how many residents the bureau said Minneapolis lost each year since 1991. '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99 '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 +500 +159 -1 0 -1,000 -2,000 -3,000 -3,601 'Census year; no estimate issued -4,000 Source: U.S. Census Bureau Star Tnbune Minneapolis sees population gain CENSUS FROM 131 "We actually see on bid sheets, 'has to be 100,000 or more,"' Jones continued. "I don't know why 100,000 is so much more attractive than 99,000, but we're excited." Although Minneapolis' year- over -year gain, from 2005 to 2006, is small - a mere 159 souls - it's still a big leap from the annual losses of more than 3,000 residents that were being registered just a few years back. Rochester, by contrast, is being credited with rapid an- nual increases in the number of new residents, so much so that the 100,000 mark can't be far away. And in fact, the city says that, thanks to annexa- tion of land from surrounding townships, it can date that mo- ment precisely. "We will hit it on Jan. 1, 2008;" said Larry Klemenha- gen, administrative supervi- sor in the Rochester /Olmsted County Planning Depart- ment. The Census Bureau still counts St. Paul among the decliners but not by as much as before. "I'd like to be able to dis- pute that, but I can't," said Bob Hume, spokesman to Mayor Chris Coleman. "We think we're headed in the right direction - businesses coming in, the housing mar- ket strong - and are quickly positioning ourselves to be in the right place." In the big picture, St. Paul has suffered much less of a loss of population than Min- neapolis. Partly because Viet- namese and Hmong refugees with large families started pouring into the city, St. Paul has kept itself relatively close UPS AND DOWNS IN NaNNFSOTA (2005 to 2006) Top 10 gainers Change Total Hugo +1,986 11,658 Woodbury +1,945 54,365 Rochester +1,867 96,975 Lakeville +1,620 53,074 Shakopee +1,585 32,865 Brooklyn Park +1,432 69,942 Otsego +1,284 12,067 Rosemount +1,168 20,468 Blaine +1,166 55,144 Ramsey . +924 22,955 Top 5 losers St. Paul -1,549 273,535 Duluth - 614 84,167 Edina -235 45,305 Richfield -216 33,262 Bloomington - 199 80,869 Source: U.S. Census Bureau MORE ONLINE Go to www.census.gov/ popest /cities/ A drop -down menu will lead either to big -city figures, or to those for all cities in all states ( "all incorporated places "). to its 1960 peak of 313,000 resi- dents. It fell to 270,000 in 1980, but started drifting slowly up- ward from there as more im- migrants By 2000, it stood at nearly290,000. Minneapolis experienced a much more severe free fall, plunging from the nation's 17th biggest city in 1950, with 522,000 residents, to 42nd in 1990, with 368,000 residents. Thanks to rapid immigra- tion, the year 2000 was the first census in decades to reg- ister any growth in Minneap- olis at all - to 383,000. Imme- diately after that, though, the annual population estimates issued by the-Census Bureau began showing substantial de- clines, year in and year out. City officials disputed that picture, pointing to a big up- tick in building permits for homes and condominium buildings, and the Metropoli- tan Council agreed that mod- est growth was taking place. But the Census Bureau's esti- mates still carried weight. The latest estimate, said a spokesman for Mayor R.T. Rybak, merely confirms the obvious. "It's clear to anyone who glances at the skyline," said Jeremy Hanson, "and seeing all the cranes at work for the last few years, that Minneap- olis is growing. It's yet fur - ther evidence of what we've known here for years." Outside of the state's Big Three, the Census Bureau re- ported that the state's biggest one -year gainer in numbers from 2005 to 2006 was Hugo, a semi -rural community north of St. Paul Hugo added nearly 2,000 people to a population that had-been less than 10,000, the bureau said. The much bigger commu- nities of Woodbury, Roches- ter, Lakeville and Shakopee rounded out the top five. St. Paul (minus 1,549) and Duluth (minus 614) were the only decliners of any substan- tial numbers. Cities often dispute these estimates, and demographer Frey urges taking those esti- mates with a grain of salt. "When it does these esti- mates," he said, "the Census Bureau is not counting peo- ple..It's using various statis- tical techniques to come up witAvhat is best described as a very good guess." David Peierson•612 -673 -4440 MEMOR,ANDUM Even the Star Tribunes editorial page is taking a more measured and conciliatory position on Housing Replacement. This editorial endorses a compromise position which deems its positive growth and revitalization aspects as desirable and necessary while supporting regulation and control of its most egregious examples — lauding regulatory efforts which are considerably less restrictive than those currently in force in Edina. This calls into question whether Edina has become too pro - active and may be damaging its competitive position as the leader in the metro Housing Replacement arena. There is, in reality, a very fine line between these two positions. L O N O B E R P R I L L E R CEO. REPLACEMENT HOUSING SERVICES CONSORTIUM LLC WWW .REPLACEMENTHOUSINGSEP,VICES.COM Star Tribune Tuesday, July 3, 2007 Section A, page 8 A reasonable check on `monster houses' 0 Minneapolis' strategy will get its test in Linden Hills. As urban problems go, well take the "monster house" issue that has arisen in southwest Min- neapolis and several inner -ring suburbs. Please. The tearing down or remodel- ing of low- priced, outdated hous- ing stock in older neighborhoods is exactly the kind of problem a healthy city should have. It's a pos- itive sign of urban resilience and renewal, one we hope the 'Twin Cities sees repeatedly in com- ing years. Infill development that takes advantage of existing roads, sewers, schools and more should play a big role in accommodating the 1 million additional Twin Cit- ies residents projected to arrive by 2030. This region cannot afford to grow otherwise. What's more, the state's clamp on aid to cities since 2003 has giv- en local politicians ample rea- sons, all trimmed in dollar signs, to smile when law -priced housing gives way to the high -end kind. That said, we also appreci- ate the move by the Minneapo- lis City Council last week to put reasonable, flexible limits on how much house can be built on a city lot. The city's action and its consequences bear watching by other older communities that want new housing, but also want to preserve their neighborhoods' character. At the heart of the new rules are requirements that a house's foot- print can't be bigger than half its lot, and its height cannot exceed 30 feet or 2%i stories, whichever is lower. Other aspects of the new rules would encourage such things as detached garages (which pre- NOT SO BIG The "not so big" house move- ment that originated with former Twin Cities architect and author Sarah Susanka promotes an alternative to supersizing new homes. Learn more about it at notsobighouse.com. serve backyards,) porches (which encourage neighborliness) and true basements (not the half -ex- posed, walkout- without -a -slope kind — they look like their petti- coats are showing). Linden Hills will likely be L the new rules' proving ground. New or drastically remodeled hous- es dot nearly every block in the leafy mixed -price neighborhood west of Lake Harriet, sitting alongside the lake cottages of .the 1910s and the ramblers of the 1940s and 1950s. Some of the new structures are properly scaled gems. Others look as though they wandered over from Lake of the Isles or Lake Minnetonka and got stuck, wedged uncomfortably on a too-small lot. If the new rules lead to more of the former and fewer,of the latter, more than the immediate neigh- bors will benefit. "Not so big" new houses are better suited than the giants to the 21st - century realities ofhigh energy costs and an imper- ative to minimize atmospheric car- bon dioxide. We hope Linden Hills becomes a model of mixed, well - designed new and older housing, and that other 'Twin Cities bor- oughs follow its example.