Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2007-09-28_EDINA GATEWAY
EDINA GATEWAY pentagon park redevelopment - preliminary development plan 16 7,- A* fw f4o 11 k3!t ar U,7 miller dunwiddle P PPP- srky-Flom and Associates. Inc. W WP K Preliminary Plan Submittal Table of Contents 28-Sep-07 Size Sheet I itle Scale Notes KAM0612 Pentagon Park Gateway LLC IA-info ns no scale 11x17 nts = not to scale Project Narrative Memo L -info Landscape Schedule ns included in narrative S -1 Location Plan 1 -500 includes AUAR boundary S -2 Site Plan - Tower Quads, Burgundy Walsh 1 -250 L -1 Landscape Plan - Illustrative Full Site 1 -250 L -2 Landscape Plan - Illustrative Tower 1 -120 from KH photoshop file L -3 Landscape Plan - Illustrative Quads West 1 -120 from KH photoshop file L -4 Landscape Plan - Illustrative Quads East 1 -120 from KH photoshop file S -3 Site Plan Tower 1 -120 dimensions and notes S -4 Site Plan Quads West 1 -120 S -5 Site Plan Quads East 1 -120 S -6a Site Plan -Tower nts also 30x42 S -6b Site Plan - Quads nts also 30x42 S -7 Site Section - Towers N/S 1 -100 building height and setback S -8 Site Section - Towers E/W 1 -100 S -9 Site Section - Quads N/S 1 -100 A -1 Shadow Study Towers Mar / Sept 1 -350 9am, 12pm, 3:30pm A -2 Shadow Study Towers June 1 -350 9am, 12pm, 3:30pm A -3 Shadow Study Towers Dec 1 -350 9am, 12pm, 3:30pm A -4 Shadow Study Quads Mar / Sept 1 -350 9am, 12pm, 3:30pm A -5 Shadow Study Quads June 1 -350 9am, 12pm, 3:30pm A -6 Shadow Study Quads Dec 1 -350 9am, 12pm, 3:30pm A -7 3D Building Illustration ns A -8 3D Building Illustration ns C -1 Utilities Plan Tower 1 -120 water, sanitary sewer C -2 Utilities Plan Quads West 1 -120 C -3 Utilities Plan Quads East 1 -120 C -4 Utilities Plan - Full Site 1 -100 30x42 Sheet C -5 Grading Plan Tower 1 -120 1 foot contours C -6 Grading Plan Quads West 1 -120 C -7 Grading Plan Quads East 1 -120 C -8 Grading Plan - Full Site 1 -100 30x42 Sheet C -9 Stormwater Diagram - Tower 1 -120 color illustration C -10 Stormwater Diagram - Quads West 1 -120 C -11 Stormwater Diagram - Quads East 1 -120 A -0 Pentagon Park - Existing Photographs ns S -10 Pentagon Park - Existing Building Data nts square footage and parking S -11 Survey - Full Site 1 -250 S -12 Survey - Tower 1 -120 S -13 Survey - Quads West 1 -120 S -14 Survey - Quads East 1 -120 T -1 Traffic Plan - and TDM ns T -2 Site Access Diagram - Towers Site ns part of traffic document T -3 Site Access Diagram _ Quads Site ns part of traffic document 30x42 provided full size - 4 copies S -6a Site Plan -Tower 1 -60 S -6b Site Plan - Quads 1 -60 L -1 Landscape Plan - Illustrative Full Site 1 -100 color C -4 Utilities Plan - Full Site 1 -100 C -8 Grading Plan - Full Site 1 -100 1 of 5 ALTA Survey 2 of 5 ALTA Survey 3 of 5 ALTA Survey 4 of 5 ALTA Survey 5 of 5 ALTA Survey ie Ar4' V, WTr !P7 P 4-M. M *�7 ST miller dunwiddle PPF-= Kimley-Horn bbbii.. = " and Associates. Inc. 123 North Third Street Suite 104 Minneapolis MN 5540I-1657 www-millerdunwiddie.com p 612-337-0000 f 612-337-0031 WP Wayzata Properties. LLC At �;I. -Al T93111kV L 7 Lu > LL t AWF -IV- a Iv q PEWASW OJ g "Mir 4— L El jr ei. r If EDINA GATEWAY Pentagon Park Redevelopment Re-Zoning and Preliminary Plan Edina, Minnesota rr MDD-5 REZONING AREA GATEWAY AUAR AREA EXISTING BUILDING A .1 ' 4 0 250 500 SCALE IN FT. .Alm- �fs-: KAM061 - TMI" rditwi%G XVVHFIc D►M 28 September 2007 LOCATION PLAN 1)"ww- dig EDINA GATEWAY S-1 1- V.. A - NW BUILDING 230 K GSF OFFICE (4 -10 STORIES) 100 STALLS C - WEST PARKING 7 LEVELS 1350 STALLS u Y. ` 4, BURGUNDY PLACE (MIXED -USE) -i< 36 UNITS I!u� 16,560 GSF 55 STALLS REQUIRED 75 STALLS PROVIDED WALSH TITLE 21,000 SF OFFICE 70 STALLS REQUIRED +� 77 STALLS PROVIDED tn�trpm�F= 7600 PARKLAWN 85,632 GSF 285 STALLS REQUIRED 400 STALLS PROVIDED 115 STALLS SURPLUS - - - - -- 6G r `� ----------. -, -- --- 2 U N ITS f 24 ENCLOSED STALLS E - E BUILDING Q- -� 260 K GSF OFFICE (4 -10 STORIES) , - 100 STALLS - • C- - - ire •,:I B - HOTEL' 80,000 GSF 150 ROOMS M F - EAST PARKING ] I 1 . 5 LEVELS D - SW BUILDING D K GSF OFFICE 1050 STALLS �_- --� (4 -12 STORIES) { " . 1 . 100 STALLS TOTAL DENSITY IN MDD -6 DISTRICT TOTAL GSF 940,567 TOTAL RES. UNITS = 670 (INCLUDES BURGUNDY PLACE, WALSH TITLE, 7600 PARKLAWN) NEW COMMERCIAL - ADDITIONAL DATA TOTAL GSF = 817,375 737,375 GSF OFFICE + 80,000 GSF HOTEL PARKING REQUIRED = 2733 STALLS PARKING PROVIDED = 2733 STALLS Miller dunwiddie C:=F1 Kimley -Horn ARCHITECTURE and Associates, Inc. 123 North Third Street Suh* 104 Minneapolis MN 55401 -1657 www.m]Uerdunvviddle.com p 612 - 337 -OD00 f 612 -337 -0031 Wayzata Properties, LLC y w . M _ Iy' NIL H - wINDEPENDENT s LIVING .. 366 UNITS —"` 369 ENCLOSED. STALLS SENIOR HOUSING -ADDITIONAL DATA TOTAL NEW UNITS 634 PARKING REQUIRED 1,110 STALLS PARKING PROVIDED 1,117 STALLS INCLUDES 104 ON STREET STALLS 0 i i I I � I J - ASSISTED LIVING 206 UNITS 105 STALLS @ GRADE 1300 STALLS ENCLOSED ^• M �t EXISTING BUILDING PROPOSED BUILDING NOTES: REVISED 24 OCTOBER 2007 PARKING AND UNIT CALCULATION FOUND IN NARRATIVE DOCUMENT ADDENDUM DATED 24 OCTOBER 2007 0 125 250 THIS GRAPHIC SUPERSEDES ALL OTHER GRAPHICS IN SCALE IN FT. N SUBMITTAL FOR UNIT COUNT AND PARKING co". KA00612 DRAW:«. .1 r'i r EDINA GATEWAY Pentagon Park Redevelopment DALE: 28 September 2007 Re- Zoning and Preliminary Plan DRAWN: dig CRECLM Edina, Minnesota C. 2M7 Ni71?r L�:k+,e 4rJ4Ktv4 M[. PROPOSED SITE PLAN EDINA GATEWAY - FULL SITE DRAWING ir'OW& B S -2r 't 4 1 t�r W 77TH ST I IAA 1 F l71 11-R_I Komi IR NN I4 d A-4; o� oov�a o o W-1 Ash'"" ►,, BARR ENGINEERING ' �,.��'i►i' 11.7 1�1� ai+r■,..• 1,11V 40 LU a0O0 00O0 SQ QODO 000 0000 J y _*+ (�_7 . *3 .t VIKING DRIVE �►. U.1 o :.. a 1 ; - _ t C) -� -, 0 + ryry i! M M i• i M tAt t r t K, Miller dunwiddie C]=Fj Kimley -Horn ARCHITECTURE and Associates, Inc 123 North Third Street Suite 104 Minneapolis MN 55401 -1657 www millerdunwiddie.com p 612 - 337 -0006 f 612- 337 -0031 Wayzata Properties, LLC t comw Nom KAkM12 6Et4FI`:!: CR'LE: EDINA GATEWAY DAM 26 Sgiwnbfr 2pp7 Pentagon Park Redevelopment Re- Zoning and Preliminary Plan °�� ct�. Edina, Minnesota mioo= tcikr a�;aaT - a •:w u Q o• V � f L NO ),I f . rN• iii a �� ii C i w I"ffr► r � � I - 0 125 250 I SCALE IIN FT. N PROPOSED SITE PLAN EDINA GATEWAY - FULL SITE ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN 6P.AFTNC,. dl'MBEit L -1 11x17 info BURGIJ� Nay PLACE -7 WALp - SH TITLE lop miller P' dunwiddie m Kimley-Horn I rll:_1_111 bih,=F) and Associates. Inc. 123 North Third Street Suite 104 Minneapolis MIN 55401-'657 www m4ler6inwiddie.com p 612-337-0000 f 612-337—0031 Wayzata Properties, LLC • —A BA.. ENGINEERING 4 t t KEYNOTES - SITE (D BUILDING ENTRY/DROP—OFF Oi SOWICE/LOADING/IRASH Os PARKING ENTRY/Exrr V&iICLE DRIVE O PLAZA PAVEMENT O SIDEWALK/PATH. 8' TYP. n, PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PERVIOUS PAVEMENT AUTO COURT GREEN ROOF PROPERTY BOUNDARY RETAINING /SCREEN WALL COMMUNITY GARDEN PERGOLA/SEATING AREA KEYNOTES — BUILDI',NG <g> OFFICE. 4-10 STORIES 230.000 GSF. TOO STALLS BELOW GRADE HOTEL. 7 STORIES. 150 RGOWS 80,000 GSF. 33 STALLS AT GRADE ® PARKING STRUCWW_ 7 LEVELS 150 STALLS BELOW GRADE. T50 STALLS AT MAIDE, 150 STALLS ABOVE GRADE, G ROOF 4> OFFICIE, 412 STORIES 250.000 GSF, 150 STALLS BELOW GRADE <g> 0FF1CF_ 4-10 STORIES 260.000 GSF. 100 STALLS BELOW GRADE <& PARYJKG STRUCTURE. 5 LEVELS T50 STALLS BELOW GRADE. 150 STALLS AT GRADE. T15C STALLS ABOVE GRADE. GREEN ROOF EX1ST1NG OFFICE EULDMIG — NO CHANGE O SKYWAY/LINK 0 60 120 @ WERGENERATiONAL RECREATION AREA S.461 . SCALE I'N FT. KAM061 MAVING Tnw- -W44ONT. %J MWE EDINA GATEWAY Pentagon Park Redevelopment DATL. 28 Septernb,..:&)- ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN Re-Zoning and Preliminary Plan TOWER SITE L-2 EDINA GATEWAY Edira, Minnesota OLL i%66, cl O lowd JMAK AWN'. me WAM ELIM WA ft" WAM w" N 10 L - - PFAMPrAL mr Z- L9 L i miller dunwidd bw&Llo mp%�Ill W- E S;t_l Igo lao, dUL Mill AL� J1111111 9L-; JM W�m ML9m W_ =011 11w low w :El C) 0 41 ft. Uj FRED RICHARDS GOLF COURSE z =I J trio ir 160 !�o rt'.7." Li r U� f ' Q Miller dunwiddie W-IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1 Kimley -Horn \ � and Associates. Inc. WP 123 North Third Street Suite 104 Minneapotis MN 55Q1 -• 657 Wayzata Properties, LLC �A ww millerdurtwiddie.com p 612 - 337 -0000 f 612- 337 -u031 �1 W 77TH ST Fr W r EDINA GATEWAY Pentagon Park Redevelopment Re- Zoning and Preliminary Plan Edina, Minnesota v— J W 76TH ST a KEYNOTES — SITE G. O E3UIILDING ENTRY /DROP —OFF Oa SERVICE/LAADING/TRASH 0 PARKING ENIRf /E (1T a as ® VEHICLE DRIVE Q PLAZA PAVEIE4T Q SIDEWALK /PATH. 8' TYP. Q PEIIESTPIAV CPOSSIP4 y PERMOVS, PAVEMENT 0 AUTO COURT Q �;PaN ROOF Q PROPERTY BOUNDARY RUANSW /SCREEN WALL 2 COMMUNITY GARDEN 4� P A /SEATNG APEA J +f SKYWAY /LR11C ® I iTERGEIERATIONAL RECREATION AREA 'T brlw - — KEYNOTES — BUILDING 0011114— ® TOWIf10mm. 1.5 STORIES 62 UNITS. 124 ENCLOSED STALLS MDEPIENDpMT LNING. 4 STORES ABOVE PAVAG G 492 UNITS 369 ENCLOSED STALLS TOTAL (164 STALLS 123 EINCLOSEO STALLS EA BLDG -) f 104 STALLLS S1iWFtET) AT GRADE 0 NOT USED e > ASSISTED L.AIIINC. 3-4 STORIES 151 UNITS TOTAL. 105 'STALLS AT GRADE EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING — NO CHANGE 0 60 120 SCALE IN FT. 7797 A .uaAr [A NO.: KAM0612 WASUgG T"U DRAWNU N7-11181FIL 28 September 2007 ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN 4.;: QUADS SITE - EAST L-4 EDINA GATEWAY 1 F I W 76TH ST a KEYNOTES — SITE G. O E3UIILDING ENTRY /DROP —OFF Oa SERVICE/LAADING/TRASH 0 PARKING ENIRf /E (1T a as ® VEHICLE DRIVE Q PLAZA PAVEIE4T Q SIDEWALK /PATH. 8' TYP. Q PEIIESTPIAV CPOSSIP4 y PERMOVS, PAVEMENT 0 AUTO COURT Q �;PaN ROOF Q PROPERTY BOUNDARY RUANSW /SCREEN WALL 2 COMMUNITY GARDEN 4� P A /SEATNG APEA J +f SKYWAY /LR11C ® I iTERGEIERATIONAL RECREATION AREA 'T brlw - — KEYNOTES — BUILDING 0011114— ® TOWIf10mm. 1.5 STORIES 62 UNITS. 124 ENCLOSED STALLS MDEPIENDpMT LNING. 4 STORES ABOVE PAVAG G 492 UNITS 369 ENCLOSED STALLS TOTAL (164 STALLS 123 EINCLOSEO STALLS EA BLDG -) f 104 STALLLS S1iWFtET) AT GRADE 0 NOT USED e > ASSISTED L.AIIINC. 3-4 STORIES 151 UNITS TOTAL. 105 'STALLS AT GRADE EXISTING OFFICE BUILDING — NO CHANGE 0 60 120 SCALE IN FT. 7797 A .uaAr [A NO.: KAM0612 WASUgG T"U DRAWNU N7-11181FIL 28 September 2007 ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN 4.;: QUADS SITE - EAST L-4 EDINA GATEWAY 1 F I B S-8 L'J X-!2 M a_ C4 1:9> G III Lj. L-LLi-1 I A --777777— S-7 ti I s — _ Q'� /2g C3 �D 47' 265' 7, N 0 0 ON Up 3 3 151 i I I I I i 1 12S 1 - d I < c illl!IIII Till 111 . I lil!Ilillil�lllllll III _�� I, La a- n. u— QD 'n 8 —` " as ta Miller dunwiddie PP"M Wey-Ham ARCHITECTURE and Associates. Inc. WP 189mw&7md 104 khwqoftKk SM46N Wayzata Properties, LLC WWWA7d3UdMWWk%&=M 612-337-OW 1612 -W7- l Cb 217* ins I)rc =) = ---3 C� 101* L UP CIA DNI G)j I I':1 W1 H 7M 119 11 * 275 1\- ' 1 65 BO an ala VIKINO DRIVE 4L 7B S_8� PROJECE COMU- 11 Z 1.., 11 F, i M%VU%r Tam EDINA GATEWAY DAIM: 2S September 2037 Pentagon Park Redevelopment Re-Zoning and Preliminary Plan E&M 37 t� KEYNOTES — SITE BUILDING ENTRY /DROP -OFF SERVICE/LOADING/TRASH (D PARKING ENTRY /EXIT O VEHICLE DRIVE PLAZA PAVEMENT SIDEWALK/PATH, 87 TYP. PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PERVIOUS PAVEMENT AUTO COURT GREEN ROOF PROPERTY BOUNDARY RETAINING/SCREEN WALL COUUUNITY GARDEN PERWLA/SEATW, AREA SKYWAY/LINK wTERGENERAncNAL RECREATION AREA KEYNOTES — BUILDING iq> OFFICE, 4-10 STORIES 230.COO GSF. 100 STALLS BELOW GRACE O HOTEL„ 7 STORES. 150 ROCHS 80,000 GSF. 33 STALLS AT GRADE 1:9> PARKING STRUCTURE, 7 LEVELS 15o STALLS BELOW GRADE. 150 STALLS Alf GRAD 150 STALLS ABOVE GRADE, GREEN ROOF <g> OFFICE, 4-12 STORIES 250.000 GSF. 150 STALLS 68-ON GRACE © OFFICF- 4-10 STORIES 260.000 GSF, 100 STALLS BELOW GRADE <Z> PARKING STRUCTURE, 5 LEVELS 150 STALLS BELOW GRADE. 150 STALLS AT GRADE. 150 STALLS ABOVE GRADE. GREEN ROOF DaSTING OFFICE BUILDING - NO CHANGE 0 60 120 SCALE IN FF. PROPOSED SITE PLAN TOWER SITE EDINACiATEWAY S-3 WI Z- JI �I FRED RICHARDS GOLF COURSE I (KEYNOTES — SITE �� BUILDING DMZY /DROP -OFF 0 SBWE/LOADING/TRASH O PARKNG BflW /DU ALE D%W (1 PLAZA PAVBiDff miller dunwiddie r�=Fj K�mley-Hom ARCHITECTURE _ and Aswdate`. Inc. NN SWA_96N Wayzata Properties, LLC p 6U.337 -M f 612-=7-M COMM. NO.: MINA GATEWAY Pentagon Park Redevelopment Re-Zoning and Preliminary Plan Edits, brmNSCIa 'r AV0612 DtsAVMVQ TRUE: ueAVIMM VDIItlEIB-� RATE: 23 September 2007 DRAWN. ceEtha:D: ID 2007 tr :w Du - ;Jd:e ArChtnturr- 1.1e. PROPOSED SfrE PLAN QUADS SITE - WEST EDINA GATEWAY M FRED RICHARDS GOLF COURSE W A Z- JI Q@ 6 I I I Miller dunwiddie PP-,=Fl Khi"-kom ARCHITECTURE `= and AssocWa. Inc. muXthi i1d tu 1 101 SM -1dw P 6 9 603 1 1 , I I �o I B I B I° I I I, M B Y 1 II I 1 B 1 B 1 1 I' 1 )NP Wayzata Properties, LLC W 77TH ST B 1 II } 1 r � I I� 1 II 1 1 EWNA GATEWAY D14E: 2S �eF!einbr. 2O2' Pentagon Pads Redevelopment Re-Zoning and Preliminary Plan CA36t3'i:lk Edna MOMMOSOW -037 1.1,- C'-- 1: ;e AICI :e.rr4 I-C. KEYNOTES — SITE RAG ENTRY/DROP —OFF SERVICE/LOADING/TRASH PARKBNG EMYRY /EXIT VEMCL.E DRIVE ®s PLAZA PAVEMENT SIDEWALK /PATH, 8' TYP. PEDESTRIAN CROSSING PERYMS PAVEMENT AUTO COURT GREEN ROOF PROPERTY BOUNDARY RETAMI G /SCREEN WALL CO MMUNTY GARDEN PERGOLA/SEATING AREA SKYNAY /LINT( XTERGENIERAnONAL RECREATION AREA (KEYNOTES — BUILDING > TIDWMiO10S. 1.5 STORIES 62 TAMILS, 124 ENCLOSED STALLS I> 1R ENT LPMG, 4 STORIES ABGVE PA1R:1K NG 492 UNITS„ 369 ENCLOSER) STALLS TOTAL (164 UNITS, 123 ENCLOSED STALLS FA BLIDG_) 104 STALLS SHARED AT GRADE I> NOT USED > A591S1E]D LfMG. 3-4 STORIES 151 Ut1TS TOTAL, 105 STALLS AT GRADE > D]OISRIING OFFICE BUILDING — NO C ® 6® 12® SCE IN FT. FROMOB3 SITE PLAN QLMM SRE - EAST EUINA GATEWAY nalk4"X %UV ER- S-5 o n tm t� YNF N R. TES — BUILDING —10 STORIES ;SF. 100 STALLS BELOW GRADE STORES. 150 ROOMS W. 33 STALLS AT GRADE iTRLICTUftE. 7 LEVELS 5 BELOW GRADE 150 STALLS AT GRADE, 5 ABOVE GRADE. GREEN ROOF —12 STORIES ;, 150 STALLS BETH GRADE —10 STORES ;SF. LBO STALLS BELOW GRADE MIXTURE, 5 LEVELS S BELOW (FADE, 150 STALLS AT GRADE. S ABOVE GRADE GREEN ROOF DFTLCE BLM DING — NO CHANGE miller dunwiddie .N� 1D mwmmo-6stmets mo tai IAN t1S1 Oda ....® p 6I033AM 1423!7 -M Gmm" =km EMNA GATEWAY Pentagon Park Developnwd Plan c� xa T2 2e s�mr,c�. 2m2 TOWER SITE sbPbn ':O'ESIOfI<)�fII�l KEYNOTES — BUILDING © TOMNHOMES. 1b STORIES 62 UNITS, 124 DODSED STALLS 0 DLDEPE wwr LIMIT+. 4 STORIES ABOVE PAf✓IONG 492 UNTS. 369 ENCLOSED STALLS TOTAL (164 UNITS. 123 DCLOSED STALLS EA BLDG.) 104 STALLS SHARED AT WADE OI NOT USED Oj ASSISTED LIVING. 3-4 STORIES 151 UNITS TOTAL 108 STALLS AT GRADE © E)GSIWG OFFICE MADING - NO CHANGE FRED RICHARDS GOLF COURSE ME ME ■��� a I W I Z• JI vI �I I I I I I I _ I KEYNOTES — SITE O BUILDING ENTRY /DROP -OFF Q SERVICE/LOADING/`TRASH O PARKING ENTRY /Ea O. VEHICLE DRIVE O PLAZA PAVEMENT O SIDEWALK /PATH. S' TYP. +� PEDESTRAN CROSSING O PERVIOUS PAVEMENT O AUTO COURT Q GREEN ROOF O PROPERTY BOUNDARY Q RETAINING /SCREEN WALL O COMMUNITY GARDEN O PERGOLA /SEATING AREA O SKYWAY /UNK O KrutGENERAmtm RECREATION AREA KEYNOTES — BUILDING © TOMNHOMES. 1b STORIES 62 UNITS, 124 DODSED STALLS 0 DLDEPE wwr LIMIT+. 4 STORIES ABOVE PAf✓IONG 492 UNTS. 369 ENCLOSED STALLS TOTAL (164 UNITS. 123 DCLOSED STALLS EA BLDG.) 104 STALLS SHARED AT WADE OI NOT USED Oj ASSISTED LIVING. 3-4 STORIES 151 UNITS TOTAL 108 STALLS AT GRADE © E)GSIWG OFFICE MADING - NO CHANGE FRED RICHARDS GOLF COURSE ME ME ■��� a I W I Z• JI vI �I I I I I I I _ I a 1 W 77TH ST n v O® 9CAE r R miller dunwiddie VS NrmlI0d SbvdSdb t0i Lm�w M IIIN041® G�0 tmdT,e ne i m�va MINA GATEWAY Pep, n Park Development Pkm ECMB c®e ®nom re m.'sr roaemv.. ire. �BIfE ab Fran Tom= �..IN a 1 W 77TH ST n v O® 9CAE r R miller dunwiddie VS NrmlI0d SbvdSdb t0i Lm�w M IIIN041® G�0 tmdT,e ne i m�va MINA GATEWAY Pep, n Park Development Pkm ECMB c®e ®nom re m.'sr roaemv.. ire. �BIfE ab Fran T CIO'-0- T.O. ROOF T 971 '-0- < Z Z :2 0 0 0 LU 56'-0- T.O. ROOF T883'—O" kVIKING DR T 823'-0- y <w RAVP La Z 'r- Ca Z > w 0 11- Z o =� w 0 a- M 100*-0' T_0. PnOFJ, 949'—O-T --4 67*-0' T-0. ROOF 882-0 Miller dunwiddie C1,=Fj Kimley-Horn l Third Street Suite I D4 and Associates. Inc. n NW& Ubmapolis MN 55Q1 -'657 Wayzata Properties, LLC •ArwwmAerdunwiddie.com p 612-327-MOO f 612-337-0031 PARKIN 814-0 G < w .0. RAM "-r 914-0 M I. ------------------------------ ji AL� =-A --T 1 1111 14 0 1 BURGUNDY PLACE 50'-0" Z --- - Z W 77TH ST 824'-0 ""'-f < 0 25 0 n Z a Z a o Z) low 00 w 0 '1- M w- 0 a- M '1 FT w C) �1-� a- dn EDINA GATEWAY KAM061 DRAIMIG IT71M NUMIFy- Pentagon Park Redevelopment DAM— 28 Septemte, 2007 tpt DIUSN: �nd TOWER SITE R — 7 Re- Zoning and Preliminary Plan Edina, Minnesota NORMANDALE RD 821 —0 w J Q � 0 Z< Q O Z I QI w t wZ 1 � J I m I I I l Miller dunwiddie C�F1 Kimley -Hom and Associates. Inc. 123 North Third Street Suite 1 D4 Minneapolis MN 55401 -1657 www millerd,inwiddie.com p 612- 337 -0000 f 612- 337 -0031 �Q E4 T �'�E`T ,�EEIc E -E(-,T1( -)h B —B WEST W � d Z O=) w O am 1 � --Al" . i F-A T i \n1 CT - F-EICE SECTION B —B EAST r w ww Z a w oQ U Y Qwl W Z WD m I T.O. ROOFdk 948 —0 COMPUTER AVEAik 820 —0 PARKING >- r 814 —0 �Q wo aZ o 0 0 25 50 aM poomczzzpmmmmm SCALE IN FT KAM0612 DIAWDX t1R1& WP— EDINA GATEWAY A SeptEm6er 200 Pentagon Park Redevelopment SITE SECTION Wayzata Properties. LLC. Re- Zoning and Preliminary Plan knd TOWER SITE S _8 CHECKED: Edina, Minnesota ... Du,,.1aoK ac.nrt «tine. ��c. MECH. —OLT.O. 914'-0" T.O. ROOF 902'-0" NORMANDALE RD 821 —0 w J Q � 0 Z< Q O Z I QI w t wZ 1 � J I m I I I l Miller dunwiddie C�F1 Kimley -Hom and Associates. Inc. 123 North Third Street Suite 1 D4 Minneapolis MN 55401 -1657 www millerd,inwiddie.com p 612- 337 -0000 f 612- 337 -0031 �Q E4 T �'�E`T ,�EEIc E -E(-,T1( -)h B —B WEST W � d Z O=) w O am 1 � --Al" . i F-A T i \n1 CT - F-EICE SECTION B —B EAST r w ww Z a w oQ U Y Qwl W Z WD m I T.O. ROOFdk 948 —0 COMPUTER AVEAik 820 —0 PARKING >- r 814 —0 �Q wo aZ o 0 0 25 50 aM poomczzzpmmmmm SCALE IN FT KAM0612 DIAWDX t1R1& WP— EDINA GATEWAY A SeptEm6er 200 Pentagon Park Redevelopment SITE SECTION Wayzata Properties. LLC. Re- Zoning and Preliminary Plan knd TOWER SITE S _8 CHECKED: Edina, Minnesota ... Du,,.1aoK ac.nrt «tine. ��c. OL ROOF MIDPOINT 881 -0 W 77TH STREET T823'—O" ROOF MIDPOINT 881'-0'. W 77TH STREET 821 —0 Li INDEPENDENT LIVING TOWNHOMES (n W Q I— = O U PARKING 2 5E w DROP LANE ww 0 77' -0" -OFF RIV E COURT 51' -0° o 00 / LOADING /AUTO ROOF MIDPOINT x 848 —0 GRADE @ PROPERTY 819 —0 - - . � a CL *23'-0ARKING a- ZZ 0 0 Z � w am 0 am Vw w INDEPENDENT LIVING TOWNHOMES _CK � LO U O PARKING 2 PARKING r LANE o o 54' -0" t t YRIV j / AUTO COURT/ / 50' -0" ROOF MIDPOINT 848 —0 . s ; GRADE @ PROPERTY ig , �� . (J 1 9 —0 �a PARKING < o� 823 -0 NORTH /SOUTH RE` -'DE L 0Z miller dunwiddie C=Fj Kimley -Horn ARCHITECTURE and Associates. Inc. 123 North Third Street Suite 104 Minneapolis MN SW1 -1657 Wayzata Properties, LLC www.millerd-inwiddie.com p 612- 337 -0000 f 612 -337 -0031 YL(Ue(7: CONY. Ho.: FAM061 ? DRAWING EDINA GATEWAY WE 28 September 200 Pentagon Park Redevelopment knd Re- Zoning and Preliminary Plan °�`r'`` ('NECICRD: Edina, Minnesota pr n:. 0 25 50 SCALE IN FT. SITE SECTIONS QUADS SITE DR{il:cG \t'YDER: S -9 SHADOWS 9:00 am June 21 Miller dunwiddie I =� KimleyHorn ARCHITECTU�= `_ and Associates. Inc. WP 123 North Third Street Suite 104 Minneapolis MN 55401 -1657 W3yz3t3 Properties, LLC www millerdunwiddie.com p 612- 337 -0000 i 612- 337 -0031 g-* z _, SHADOWS 12:00 pm June 21 scale 1" = 350' COINL ��� -� hAM061: EDINA GATEWAY Pentagon Park Redevelopment DATE: 8 September 2007 SHADOW STUDY JUNE 21 PRAWN: dig TOWER SITE Re- Zoning and Preliminary Plan caEC►Ep: Edina, Minnesota .r Dunr"Od+e Arcnrtettu.e. inc. P- bL%W1','G sryBEx: A -1 I �i Miller dunwiddie / = Kimley -Horn ARCHITECTURE and Associates. Inc. WP 123 North Third Street Suit 104 Minneapolis MN 55401 -1637 Wayzata Properties, LLC www m1lerd inwidde.corn p 612 - 337 -0000 f 612- 337 -0031 "' vM SHADOWS 12:00 pm March 21 I September 23 scale 1 " = 350' SHADOWS 3:30 pm March 21 I September 23 PCWE47: \ KAM061? DEAWD;G TTTtf- MAfi. \d. \4 AhF3i EDINA GATEWAY 28 September 200 Pentagon Park Redevelopment SHADOW STUDY MARCH 21 SEPTEMBER 23 dig TOWER SITE A -2 Re- Zoning and Preliminary Plan iii ,r•. Edina, Minnesota � ow+.aae Jrcnrtectvrc. arc. z AI SHADOWS 9:00 am December 22 Miller dunwiddie C=I1 Kimley -Hom "PCHITEOTIIRE and Associates. Inc 123 North Third Street Suite 104 Minneapolis MN 55401 -1657 www m4le rdu nwiddie.com p 612 - 337 -0000 If 612 - 337 -0001 SHADOWS 12:00 pm December 22 scale 1" = 350' WP EDINA GATEWAY Pentagon Park Redevelopment Wayzata Properties, Lt_c. Re- Zoning and Preliminary Plan Edina, Minnesota ,ww SHADOWS 3:30 pm December 22 CORM. NO.: KAM061_ O?i.AlnXG TT71E: NOVMML DATE: 28 September 2007 SHADOW STUDY DECEMBER 22 A-3 DluyN; CIA TOWER SITE CHECKED: L1h�77 Wit r Dunw;jc� Arc ^' - . , ,f R _ 1 ♦.r A ALI ' • + 00 am June 21 Al r a scale 1" = 350' Miller dunwiddie I =Fj Vimley -Horn and Associates. Inc. 123 North Third Street Suite 104 Minneapolis MIN 55401-1657 Wayzata Properties, LLC www mdlerdvnwiddie.com p 612 -337 -0000 f 612 - 337 -0031 � ry i� Y I � ��f�w. i•l M- NO.: hAM061 - EDINA GATEWAY -1 -: 28 September 2007 Pentagon Park Redevelopment dig Re- Zoning and Preliminary Plan cuEClXa Edina, Wnesota © 2007 Nilkr C>v' *.- - ArcMtecMe. Im. SHADOW 12:00 pm June 21 SHADOW STUDY JUNE 21 QUADS SITE SHADOW 3:30 pm June 21 A -4 SHADOW 9:00 pm March 21 / September 23 scale 1" = 350' — � t Miller dunwiddie PIM Kimley -Horn and Associates. Inc. 123 North Third Street Suite lOk Minneapolis MN 55401 -1657 Wayzata Properties, LLC www millerd,Jnwiddie.com p 612- 337 -0000 f 612- 337 -0031 f 40b - b l i, r PROJECT: EDINA GATEWAY Pentagon Park Redevelopment Re- Zoning and Preliminary Plan Edina, Minnesota �.� SHADOW jh 3:30pm March 21 / September 23 comes NO -c KAM0612 pasRt.XC TME. DATE: Septernber 2007 SHADOW STUDY MARCH 21 SEPTEMBER 23 pR4VN: dig QUADS SITE P. Nne;ddw kthAtCtvt. fM. A -5 u I SHADOW 9:00 am December 22 scale 1 " = 350' Miller dunwlddIe /��� Kimley -Hom \� and Associates. Inc. MEW-. -�: 123 North Third Street Suite 104 Minneapolis MN 55401 -1657 Wayzata Properties. LLC. www.miUerd inwiddie.corn p 612- 337-0000 f 612 - 337 -0031 EDINA GATEWAY Pentagon Park Redevelopment Re- Zoning and Preliminary Plan Edina. Minnesota I SHADOW 12:00 pm December 22 SHADOW 3:30 pm December 22 Caxw hAMOf 1 _ ORAWIN-C. 7T11B: Qw 4wl- %G \r YNFY- DA E: 28 September 2007 SHADOW STUDY DECEMBER 22 RKWN: dig QUADS SITE A -6 CHECKED: Ir;iller dunwiddie C=fj Kimley -Horn � 123 North Third Sfreat Suite 104 �� °� and Associates. Inc. WP Minneapolis MN 55401 -1 65 7 Wayzata Properties. LLC. www. m Ilerdu nwiddie. com p 612 -337 -0000 f 612- 337 - ^-03T 01 .r I ;0 EDINA GATEWAY Pentagon Park Redevelopment Re- Zoning and Preliminary Plan Edna. Mirresota VIEW LOOKING NORTH EAST FROM NORMANDALE RD. & VIKING BLVD. PEWNr. M-1111 ff3t cxnaL 100.: KAM061; DRtW 6 TnM fa'tE: 28 September 2007 3-D BUILDING DRAWN: dig ILLUSTRATIONS /� A_7 aUy! NcnRedme. M[. Miller dunwiddie P�� -�� TrCTURE __ aW AmociaWs. Inc. 123 North Third Street Suite 104 Minneapolis MN 55401 -'657 Wayzata Properties, LLC www m4lerdunwiddie.cort p 612 - 337 -0000 f 612- 337 -2031 - -� Fw Y L EDINA GATEWAY Pentagon Park Redevelopment Re- Zoning and Preliminary Plan Edina. Urresc *a VIEW LOOKING SOUTH WEST NEAR PARKLAWN AND W 77TH COMIL NO, KAM0612 DR&WMG Trim- DAM 28 September 2007 3-D BUILDING A-8 DRAWN. d14 ILLUSTRAT',ONS cxec-r,,� i�.i'}�% Y:w Dun6aarc ,+rcnrtectv�e. inc. O O O S W Q U7 4J v O Z 0 Z VIKING t DR,, vc GRADING PLAN - TOWER i LEGEND EXISTING SANITARY EXISTING WA FERMAIN EXISTING SANITARY SYMBOL EXISTING WATERMAIN SYMBOL PROPOSED SANITARY PROPOSED WATERMAIN 0 PROPOSED SANITARY SYMBOL PROPOSED WATERMAIN SYMBOL 0 PROPCS =D S -ORM S -RU: -R; • PROPOSED STORM SEWER PF- KEYNOTES — BUILDING OFFICE 4-10 STIES HOTEL 7 STORIES„ 150 ROOMS © PARKING STRUCTURE 7 LEVEIS ® OFFIM 4-12 STORIES ® oFnix h 10 STORIES F> PARKING STR1)CTURE. 5 LEVELS lsw:s Revrsiotns 60 120 lsw:s Revrsiotns I App. DRAWING NAME GATE DRAWI G NAME Im 2y- orn C M and Associates, Im 7S5D,yt.i�si.., �F, � - ..,, F11 to. (651) 6.5- s? ST -AUL. vow sa•A 51r-• °AX NA (651) 645-5116 1 , 1 l I. miller- dunwiddie ARCHITECTURE I Z3 North Third Street Sune 104 Minneapolis MN 55401 -1657 www.millerdunwiddie.com p 612- 337-0000 } 612_337 -0031 GATEWAY Pentagon Park Redevelopment Re- Zoning and Development Plan Edina. Minnesota CITY PROJECT _ SHEE7 X OF x — DESIGNED BY: DJH/TPH CouNITY PROJECT - S}CE T NO. DRAWN BY: RBC CHECKED BY. DJC S.A.P. — DATE: 09 /28/07 S.P. PROJECT NO. 160512010 -3 EXISTING SANITARY EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING SANITARY SYMBOL EXIST NG WATERMAIN S"MBO'_ PROPOSED SANITARY PROPOSED WATERMAIN 0 PROPOSED SANITARY SYMBOL d % PROPOSED WATERMAIN SYMBOL Q PROPOSED STORM STRUCTURE PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE a KEYNOTES — BUILDING-- - 0 30 so zo © TOWNHOUM 1.5 STORIES 5Ca_t N =EET ® soe"DENT I vm. a STORIES Aw%s PARKING I I O NOT USED 0 ASSSTED LM . 3 -4 STORSES I I -- I I I - I - I -- I_ I -- I I T ----------------------- I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I Ail 1 I , I I I I I I I I I I I I I I N 77TI-I STREE UTILITIES PLAN - QUADS WEST No. Date Rev isi,:r :. App, DRAINING NAME GATE- UTL- TWR �� Kimley -Horst � and Associates, Inc. 2yap Lw�n A� �� qu,.r .,:,, I . �. _,�) s.�s -.•y� ST. PAUL. VOMKWu J5114 -Ax w-A ; art+ s�5 -5rs WP Wayzata properc�ei 1 L< miller dunwlddle HrtECfURE 123 North Third Street Su de 104 Minneapolis MN 55401 -1557 www.millerdunwiddie.com p 612.337 -M } 612.337 -OMI EDINA GATEWAY Penta p Pentagon Park Redevelopment Re- Zoning and Development Plan Edina, Minnesota CITY PROJECT _ SHEET x OF x -PH03.DWG DESIGNED BY. DJH/TPH COUNTY PROJECT SHEET NO. C -2 SH T DRAWN BY- RBC CHECKED BY. DJC S.A.P. - DATE- 09/28/07 S.P. _- PROJECT NO. 160512070.3 EXISTING SANITARY EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING SANITARY SYMBOL - EXISTING WATERMA +N S`!MBO' PROPOSED SANITARY PROPOSED WATERMAIN O PROPOSED SANITARY SYMBOL � g PROPOSED WATERMAIN SYMBOL O PROPOSED STORM STRUCTURE —Y PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE KEYNOTES — BUILDING © TOWNHOUES. 1.5 STORES ® INIOUVVENT LW4G. 4 STORES ABOVE PARKING O NOT USED Oj ASSISTED L NG. 3--4 STORES - -- ----- - - - - - -- ie'iCG r UTILITIES PLAN - QUADS EAST t.o. I Q Y a e Q Y a ii 0 30 60 170 SCALE r. _ Dote Revisions App. DRAVANG NAME miller dunwiddie CITY PROJECT _ SHEET x OF x GATE_UTL— TWR —PH03 -OiyG IGrfl�p� Horn EDINA GATEWAY SHUT NO, DESICNED BY: DJH/TPH ey- �ntagon Park Redevelopment ;COUNTY PROJECT — ... DRAWN BY: RBC _. and Amiates, Inc. 123 North Third Street Sude104 Re- Zoning and C -3 CHECKED BY. DJG 11 . -. , ,I- 95, Minnea otis MN 55401 -1657 Development Plan – nso war' ACE. ,4sr, w:rE .KS. - -- , . P p S.A.P. DATE: 09/29/07 sr. PAUL, VwrsOrA Wn'14 +x na <c 1} 545,51-6 Warzacz Prcperues. LLC. www.millerdunwiddie.com PROJECI NO. 160512010.3 p 612 -337 -M f 612 - 337 -0031 Fdlna, Minnesota S P ._ SH LEGEND EXISTING SANITARY EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING SANITARY SYMBOL EXISTING WATERMAIN SYMBOL PROPOSED SANITARY — -- PROPOSED WATERMAIN PROPOSED SANITARY SYMBOL -F1 % PROPOSED WATERMAIN SYMBOL Q PROPOSED S70RM STRUCTJRE PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE f i• it °z KEYIMM - BUKD*4 ®on¢ «v sins rise w..m sas m eras m wit > sonnz z .ewe �� s a swu a as mnns awsR.. � om m >Wa anus. owz nc vus a o.� n>. >s.n: woc sea e�m +mv ®amaos ust . aeea � ,ec s ers ss sn® ssus now .� sn�i � w�ascsaas a. stra si n.1¢ net wa swiu w a¢ r } 5,°.AL• A miller dum iddie tnmw&w s.ws .ft=► #Gviel -llun �c A56 � : - EDINA GATEWAY J Pentagon Paris Redevelopent m Lx. Preliminary Development Plan caea w.exov, �.,.� wi e.ogt we pasty wr e..rr rwm....� CwcwtR NN r1JU C-4 0 Z 3 Qj Z W Q U) i J � J 1 i�r I I 1 1 I 1 ( I I� 1 ( 1 I 9 1 1 I I � J 1 Q ; FE= 8: 1 � I 1 I ck !O I I I I I i I ( J J---- - - - - -- I I ! 1 ., G , NEST VIKING LOW -------- ---------------- "--------- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- ��C7Aj�jlt��� \� i — 1 , — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — MC 7711/ 5111EIFT r KEYNOTES — BUILDING I I <8> 0F110E: 4-10 STORES I I 1 ® HOTEL 7 S'TORIM 150 ROOMS 1 �+ © PAR U4 STR XM*tF: 7 LE1US i ® OFFICE. 4-12 STORIES i ® OFRZ 4-10 STORES I <�> PARKING STRI,CTIJR — 5 lEVE1S { , I I I I J 1 1 1 1 30 so 120 � 7 � 1 No. I Dais I Revisions App. DRAWING NAME miller dunwiddie CITY PROJECT GATE_UTL_TWR�HD3.DINC ��� EDINA GATEWAY - S � N� CF x DESIGNED BY: DJH/TPH Kiml@ -Horn Pentagon Park Redevelopment }i Penta COUNTY PROJECT - DRAwN BY: RBC Re-Zoning nd C -5 -- - � and Assocta�t@S, Inc. 123 North Third 5tnst Suite ltw g CHECKED BY. DJC S.A.P. — nso uMluomn A16 VIEST. SU X51 R- w ;er) aa�.•s� Minneapolis MN 55401 -1657 Development Plan Wa DATE: 09/28/07 ST. PAVt. YYf30TA pia =AL Ka ,w) u5-sre rtata Praporc�es.LLC. www milterdunwiddie.com SH T PROJECt NO. 150512010.3 p 612 -337 -M f 612- 337 -0031 Edina, Minnesota S.P. — r i l?rl . �7:t�11�►�- �II��IIiL a : . 0 30 60 120 SCALE 17 - GRADING PLAN - QUADS WEST ho. Date RevrsionS App. DRAYdNG NAME — E_UTL— TNR�H03.D1aG y �_Fj 10mle -Horn and Associates, InG. ew '� � 34% 'c ,tom, f., -Qy t 0wu, V"IW J151. AX mn " "5-- 5416 Wartata Properties, tLC miller dunwiddie ARaet¢crURE 123 North Third Street Suite 104 Minneapolis MN 5541.1657 www.millerdunwiddie . co m p 612- 337 -OOM f 612 - 337 -0031 EDINA GATEWAY Penta p Pentagon Park Redevelopment Re- Zoning and Development ment Plan Edina. Minnesota CITY PROJECT _ SHEET x CF x DESIGNED BY: DJH/TT-'H couNrY PROJECT _ SH ET NO. C -6 C` LJ T .3 f1 I DRAWN BY: RBC CHECKED BY. DJC S.A.P. — DATE: 09/28/07 _ S.P. FROJECF N0. 160512010.31 KEYNOTES — BUILDING ® Toww oum 14 sroRlEs ® *VEPamErrT 1JY.+G. 4 STORIES ABOVE PARKING ONOT USED p ASSWED I..NM. 3—; STORES 828.0 �� FFE= 828.0 FFE =828.0 ;_ FFE =830.0 W3o. FFE =828.0 HP X P 1b 14 XtP O O -HP \ FFE =834.0 - LFE =823.0 - O FFE =834.0 LFE =823.0 __ - -------- , y5- GRADING PLAN - QUADS EAST N.3. onie I Revisions App. DRAVANG NAME cATE UTL— TNii-PW03.DWr �� Kiml Horn Ci� ASSOCI8f8S, 11 M :sowwon Aw- Vsr, v1 a ms. n - w 1651) 6N5 i97 Si Viii 10"ICLpu iWw r Mo. (161) 615-51'6 �,T7f1 v�lllj --'� Wayxat3 ProFcrtes, LIC. miller dunwiddie ^'�' °` 123 North Third Street Suite 104 Minneapolis 55401 -1657 www.millerdunwiddie.com p 612 -337 -M f 612 - 337 -OMI EDINA GATEWAY entagon Park Redevelopment Re-Zoning and g Development Plan Edina, Minnesota CITY PROJECT _ SHEET x L x couNrY PROJECT - SST Na C —% T SH JIB I DESIGnEn BY: DJH/TPH oRAwN BY: RBC cwcxED BY: DJC S.A.P. DATE: 09/20/07 S P _ PROJECT Mo. 1E0512M3 IQY}n16 -Fen 1)er_ rruo ®f. ! SfJit Eta P�K �wd' SiC4 m mom¢ rrrc CY. D sous o �,! 9wtS�w6 � SvuS a aY�a. o sru. ,o[ acE om m �ewec 4-r seees sr. w +o s,wus m ora w�asas v � sws < n.u_ ,� eras .oc a+c o�m r)ar ®.raemn use . scars 4sx ..rrc i We. 9 @Q® SYt1T Y)il (�P aR .D DaxO s'ra)s P rrF1 lr >ils 9�® 4r aaF ®! rrel T IrQ >� ,ID sous a gQ ®F1Ai OFQ rAli - �D [.wK I miUer dunwiddw MWAOIl ri..ra..r .I...r.r.lru�. ®�k 1 � 1 r I I 1 { I I ' 1a� FE.aaoo Low FFE -834.0 LFE-4= ' { p 1 I � 1 1` EDINA GATEWAY - - Pentagon Paris Redevelopment - -- -- --- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- - -- Preliminary Development Plan EA- 0— D w 1w mo YrE M FEET WY(IE)2 l,R _ 28 SiptwnWr 200) Berle o�� <�e v WC prom rA. o..� rurm.. k ml��ea tee: ti C-8 / FFE =826.0 � r I j elatNi�R3S0 '; 1 � 150 CART /PLATE (8) ME , 1 1 ' 1 1 I�,jlr 1 150 CARS/PLATE (V ' FFE -827.D u 25M 14.14) I 1 FTE - 8274 ® R I 1 1 r -- 1 VTJ IQY}n16 -Fen 1)er_ rruo ®f. ! SfJit Eta P�K �wd' SiC4 m mom¢ rrrc CY. D sous o �,! 9wtS�w6 � SvuS a aY�a. o sru. ,o[ acE om m �ewec 4-r seees sr. w +o s,wus m ora w�asas v � sws < n.u_ ,� eras .oc a+c o�m r)ar ®.raemn use . scars 4sx ..rrc i We. 9 @Q® SYt1T Y)il (�P aR .D DaxO s'ra)s P rrF1 lr >ils 9�® 4r aaF ®! rrel T IrQ >� ,ID sous a gQ ®F1Ai OFQ rAli - �D [.wK I miUer dunwiddw MWAOIl ri..ra..r .I...r.r.lru�. ®�k 1 � 1 r I I 1 { I I ' 1a� FE.aaoo Low FFE -834.0 LFE-4= ' { p 1 I � 1 1` EDINA GATEWAY - - Pentagon Paris Redevelopment - -- -- --- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- - -- Preliminary Development Plan EA- 0— D w 1w mo YrE M FEET WY(IE)2 l,R _ 28 SiptwnWr 200) Berle o�� <�e v WC prom rA. o..� rurm.. k ml��ea tee: ti C-8 LEGEND PERVIOUS PAVEMENTS GREEN ROOFS INFILTRATION AREA UNDERGROUND STORAGE STORM SEWER STRUCTURE > STORM SEWER PIPE O O E 3 Z Q Q / �0 i t t - t / / t t t t I ` / I 1 I / 1 1 + I t °�, t I ! I I I I I 1 z I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 M'FST - tt o I I I I ----------- IIn x --- -------- ----- - - - - -- i STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 27.4% PERVIOUS PAVEMENT 7.4% GREEN ROOFS 22.3% INFILTRATION 42.9% UNDERGROUND STORAGE i (37,600 CU FT OF STORAGE) ABOVE TREATMENT METHODS MEET 100% APPLICABLE STORMWATER JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS ..� - - - - - -- -------------------------- t_. xHF O I 1 I � I I I I I x II - I I I I 61 1 1 I xH P 1 - - --- -- --- - - -- -- •T Lwi - ----- —'^------ - - -- `------- - - - --- ---- ----- 1 , G7tQ Rev. s.Ons - ORAYYINC NAME GATE_GRO_rMRNAME WG �imle -HOfn1 wd Associates, Inc :sso UrvaegTT AVE, rtST, q.T k L� w: ;c -,1 w� -a,,: ST OAVL 10%WWTA $,a x. WQ tc-,i aa--,,c _ � Pr,. -' • ,. W'rz �• e r � LLC mitter dunwiddie """�""`"� 123 ►bra ilvrdMN S WI- Idi Mi++nsapdisfrN 5567 -idS7 ,,,,,,,,,,,� D 612- 337 -0000 1 612- 337-0031 EDINA GATEWAY Pentagon Park Redevelopment Re-Zoning and b Development Plan Edna, Mminda IrY Fro cT CITY SHEET X Or X DESIGNED BY. DJH(TPH couNTir PROJECT - SHEET ND. VSHT __ DRAWN BY: RBC CHECKED BY: DJC SAP. — DATE: �e;,n /n! S. P. — ___ - - - -_ - '' PROJECT NO. 160512010.3 LEGEND PERVIOUS PAVEMENTS GREEN ROOFS INFILTRATION AREA UNDERGROUND STORAGE C STORM SEWER STRUCTURE - -- STORM SEWER PIPE fZ SEE T •,L STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 35.6% PERVIOUS PAVEMENT 2.6% GREEN ROOFS 24.596 INFILTRATION 37.3% UNDERGROUND STORAGE (- 60,000 CU FT OF STORAGE) ABOVE TREATMENT METHODS MEET 100% APPLICABLE STORMWATER JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS p . �l, 44 J NP - !vim i <-< ~ate W. 77TH STREET --- -------------------------------------- --- - - - - -- ------------------------- — --- - - -___ -- __ -____ 0 30 60 130 SCALE IN FEET NO -C±C {C GIsori - APP. - ;AWING NAr.L —U1L -7rig PMOS.uwc -L,I�D BY: D.N /TPH ICIlrile -Harn xWAssaClateS, Inc, zo mokims�Tr Aw Kv. sinE su. r V. ..v<..w�.,otA leas WP miller dunwiddie ,,, R,� 123NorT.Thel51mdsudeI" pol w�+r., s wN MM www.m4sr jvwk $Ae+ p 6 1 2 - 337 4000 f 612.47M 9 ED €NA GATEWAY Pentagon Park Redevelopment Re-Zoning and Development Plan p Ei *A.lAMrlelOr CITY PROJECT _ COUNTY PRO. ECT El DRAM BY: PBC 0 n cuteCKED aw 0 is - lirt I 04/2e/07 PRO..ECT N0 160512010.3 S.P. — LEGEND PERVIOUS PAVEMENTS C GREEN ROOFS INFILTRATION AREA ................ UNDERGROUND STORAGE 6 STORM SEWER STRUCTURE > STORM SEWER PIPE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT (ENTIRE QUADS SITE) 35.6910 PERVIOUS PAVEMENT 2.6% GREEN ROOFS 24.5% INFILTRATION ; r 37.3% UNDERGROUND STORAGE (60,000 CU FT OF STORAGE) v mglg-� -.MR aq ull '""M 7- 3 19 7 • -.'.1 - 5 •.. w. I� t t r I ABOVE TREATMENT METHODS MEET 100% APPLICABLE STORMWATER JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS I II �` II ----------------- I 4- -- - - -- Y 1 — —-— I Q r STREET XW 1 a 1 1 1, I 11 r - -Z - "'0 30 60 '20 SCALE IN FEET App. GRA�1AhC NAME NAloaowc miller dunwiddie wild e EDINA GATEWAY CITY PROJECT _ SHEET X C; GATE-NO c n IGmle� -Horn �� Pentagon Park Redevelopment COUNTY PROJECT - DESIGNED BY. DJH/TPH DRAWN BY: RBC _ � �, �� 123 Nortfl TArd Sineet 51:4101 Re -Zonin and g FS CHECKED BY. G.:u 2550 imrsav r A� �,- v u M- ,q- �65i) as�1vT Waytan Properties. LLC. KrimapoisMN S34.^t -1657 Development Plan S.A.P. - DATE' 09/28/07 ST �A.., VhV%1TA S5— FAIL Ira (031) su -5116 wwwmVerd rrmddwzom T PROJECT N0, 160512010.3 P 612- 337-OOM t 612 - 337-=1 S P - Miller dunwiddie I �� Ira,* -Hom Czl-r?TFCTURE aW Associates. Inc. 123 No t@[ Third Stet Suite 106 Nin"Spofls/N %W1 -1657 wwM-a otdunwiddie.com p 612 -337 -M IF 612 - 337 -Ml EXISTING TOWER SITE EXISTING QUADS SITE rear:: VP EDINA GATEWAY Pentagon Park Redevelopment Wayzata Properties. LLc. Re- Zoning and Preliminary Plan Edina, Minnesota i:.,. ••1 -.err kAMObI_ uxA16G TMX: DATE: 28 September 200? dji EXISTING SITE PHOTOGRAPHS TOWER AND QUADS SITES [fh-&WiSl: V U11M, A -0 A Miller dunwiddie 123 North Third Street Suite 104 Minneapolis MN 55401 -1657 .-:w.mltlerdunwlddle.com p 612 - 337 -0000 If 612- 337 -0031 Alternative Urban Areawide Review Existing Building Statistics Gateway Development EDINA, MN MARCH 22, 2007 P 1 71 B ACT. 1 - I RE w 3 �\ v -4- 16 Existing Building and Parking Statistics P4 343 ACT. 479 REP �I r I - - -- I I �I n 1111111111111111 11111111 I 736 ACT. 1 009 ACT. p3 `°'• PZ 9'76 REQ. 976 REQ r l II I Iln r nlll ! I 0 �1.IC�'.'�{,}'{'.�1.'C.I�1�1 - - - - -- J�g I'I�" "'1'111, ; ,. - __ rl al 9 X71 _ ..' 1Z 13 I L ill ,IjiIIIl I !! _L, n {I IIT?1Tfii'f.-, ^��U ulllil: l -- - 7 ......jjII' U , !!�IIIIIIIIIII!� .!IIIIIIUIIIIIIIIIIIII� �, Ilunnuuuunnnun ic= 13 I,II'I,I VVV 11 I �_i. .O a .................. ..... 0 14 - -� .� U C I I III.... ; -D a .:............. ._� _ 1 -1 - .� -- - -- I, , I I I I I I ' I I I I I I I I I I i I ! 'Wayzata Propert,os occupancy percentages as of 01 01 06 "Lot Area Sq. Ft. numbers taken from Hennepm County pubic records KAM0612 Pentagon Park Master Plan - March 22. 2007 miller dunwiddie V'�Fj Kimley -Horn ^RCHITECTLI ?E �= and Associates, Inc. WP 123 NW 61M Set Sufis 104 Itiriinpie tNN 55401 -1657 Wayzata Properties, LLC www.mkUwdwwAddie.com Ill 612 -337 -0W f 612- 337 -Ml All5aes I bbU,1bU I I 67.3 " -0 L IId.bld Z.9y I Z,dufb I I 3,3ul TOTALS 227,218 5.22 Totals 1,703,770 1 39.1 EDINA GATEWAY Pentagon Park Redevelopment Re- Zoning and Preliminary Plan Edina, Minnesota i:n'U- cur DE011` - - -,. Tr71-. r. t-e: 2H September ^'007 EXISTING BUILDING STATISTICS DRAWN: - - dig EDINA GATEWAY - FULL SITE CHECKED: v2007 Miller Ov-1i 10w ArchAecture. Inc. DRAWING \t'UMIL S -10 BUILDINGS PROPERTIES PARKING PARCEL DESCRIPTION NUMBER ADDRESS STORIES BUILDING S.F.IFLR. TOTAL G.S.F. TOTAL BLDG. G.S.F. %OCC.' PARCEL LOT AREA So. FT. II- ACRES ACTUAL REQ. BY CODE TOTAL REQ. PENTAGON TOWER 1 4940 77th St. W. 6 11,438 68.628 142.876 76.4 °. ;6 A 348.605 8.00 636 343 714 2 4960 Viking Dr. 1 1 1.648 11.648 81.6% B 5.045 0.12 58 3 4900 Viking Dr. 1 18.404 18.404 2.7% C 78.144 1.79 92 4 4901 77th St. W. 1 19.273 19.273 60.3% M 17.305 0.40 96 5 7701 Normandale Rd. 1 10.342 10.342 57.0% N 77.077 1 77 52 6 4815 77th St. W. 1 14.581 14,581 100.0% TOTALS 526,176 12.08 73 PENTAGON QUADS 7 4660 77th St. W. 3 17.452 52.357 203.584 100.0% D 237.523 5.45 1008 262 1018 8 4640 77th St- W. 3 16.999 50.997 63.0% E 235.834 5.41 255 9 4620 77th Sl. W. 3 16.600 49.800 40.0% TOTALS 473,357 10.87 249 10 4600 77th St. W. 3 16.810 50.430 75 5 °j F 93.758 2.15 252 11 4570 77th St. W. 3 17,304 51.911 151.469 56.7% G 87.213 2.00 36 260 1012 12 4550 77th Sl. W. 3 16.474 49.421 37.0% H 87.479 2 -01 247 13 4530 77th St. W. 3 16.713 50.138 45.8% 1 85.333 1 96 251 PENTAGON EAST 14 4510 77th St. W. 3 16.993 50.979 96.7% 1 123.236 2.83 255 15 7600 Parklawn 4 21,408 85.632 136,611 TOTALS 477,019 10.95 344 428 428 PENTAGON TOWER S E 16 7710 Computer Ave. 1 25.620 25.620 25 620 MI K 114,600 2.63 82 128 128 'Wayzata Propert,os occupancy percentages as of 01 01 06 "Lot Area Sq. Ft. numbers taken from Hennepm County pubic records KAM0612 Pentagon Park Master Plan - March 22. 2007 miller dunwiddie V'�Fj Kimley -Horn ^RCHITECTLI ?E �= and Associates, Inc. WP 123 NW 61M Set Sufis 104 Itiriinpie tNN 55401 -1657 Wayzata Properties, LLC www.mkUwdwwAddie.com Ill 612 -337 -0W f 612- 337 -Ml All5aes I bbU,1bU I I 67.3 " -0 L IId.bld Z.9y I Z,dufb I I 3,3ul TOTALS 227,218 5.22 Totals 1,703,770 1 39.1 EDINA GATEWAY Pentagon Park Redevelopment Re- Zoning and Preliminary Plan Edina, Minnesota i:n'U- cur DE011` - - -,. Tr71-. r. t-e: 2H September ^'007 EXISTING BUILDING STATISTICS DRAWN: - - dig EDINA GATEWAY - FULL SITE CHECKED: v2007 Miller Ov-1i 10w ArchAecture. Inc. DRAWING \t'UMIL S -10 TRACT 1 8 la h �• - � l a- rr,aCT 5 �\� �.,.- -rte .r�7 �.� i E,'i `aC� F`)i� �q.'• �U� i. � .� •`'.r,;-�'• � +mac �` V \ - c Jyr -I TACT CI [ r*'qv-, �C- - • I C I C tau\ —. miller dunwiddie r�=" Kimley- Hom++^�f� ARCHITECTURE an d Associates. Inc. 123 Mw&1htrd Street 5wta 104 KM 5=4657 Wayzata Properties, LLC wwwAdandmimiddaeAun III 612-=7-M If 612317 -31 TACT J TRACT I C_ L'-- — -E- - i G i" art_ rI`f T LCD ..�I III -- T 7 c <j _ I : ^ rRACr —RA CT c R, CT 19 I c a-- I y� o<-?o_ u 1 L. `dO T ACr 7PAC, As a. F TRACr ' 4 t — y_— C•...J c —v.c -cc. �! c c =:C c e� rC s �,e c �a�- °reCe" c ec:L CC CI `Ifli �� �L�c� cal' �C �:I —S I -_0 )1 A. _•'° i �T;?4C7 it t 1 my .r— � -�� s b�i@T �ra.:Cr r,AC. TRACT K 7R.ACT L TRACT A4 TRACT A' TRACT 0 TRACT ? inACT S C 'R4C7 R TRACT 0 737Ai F 7RAC7 0 PP.OJECf: EDINA GATEWAY Pentagon Park Redevelopment Re-Zoning and Preliminary Plan Edbm, 61B mesota 0 125 250 SCALE IN FT. N COMM. Na.: KAMO612 DRAWING TrnF- DATE: 2?, September 2007 EXISTING SITE SURVEY DRAWN: 419 EDINA GATEWAY - FULL SITE CDEChF.D: 1• = 250' ©2007 nine, AMN,ectme. I.C. DRAWING X77YDEIr S -11 I \tom (=c.��. ra► IS W. � `�• � � � �� r : � c!i :�� a � � �,�� gyp' • T � y !i i and Associates. '�� EDINA GATEWAY A '`t Pentagon - rt�ts._ � � ♦♦ _ate ?� \ 0 •-I �iiai 1► .i� - - - - -- i IL --A f _ Gt III I IN ONE t r lit ping a L= a I. i;iL MIA WRI -li ..i_ " -� m Me r, wo JL qmm-wrkumg, imivi MMEE!P I . ti T.I -�mmmmmmmm� , i4v HN 40- Traffic Study for Edina Gateway, LLC Pentagon Park Redevelopment Mixed -Use Community Edina, Minnesota Traffic Impact Analysis September, 28 2007 Prepared for: Miller Dun widdie Architecture TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. ..............................1 2.0 STUDY AREA ................................................................................................... ..............................1 2.1 EXISTING LAND USE .............................................................................. ..............................2 2.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRAFFI C ................................................ ..............................2 3.0 TRIP GENERATION .................... ..............................2 4.0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION ..................................................................................... ..............................2 5.0 PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES ............................................................. ..............................3 5.1 HISTORIC TRAFFIC GROWTH ............................................................... ..............................3 5.2 TRIP ASSIGNMENT 1 FORECAST VOLUMES ........................................ ..............................3 6.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS ...................................................................................... ..............................3 6.12007 EXISTING CONDITIONS .....:........................................................... ..............................4 6.2 2014 NO BUILD CONDITIONS ................................................................ ..............................4 6.3 2014 BUILD CONDITIONS ...................................................................... ..............................4 7.0 TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT .......................................................... ..............................5 8.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................... ..............................5 GRAPHICT -2 & T- 3 ........................................................................................ ..............................6 1.0 INTRODUCTION The proposed development is a mixed use development with.office, retail and housing components on two sites along W 77`h Street between TH 100 and France Avenue in the City of Edina. It is expected that the proposed redevelopment would be completed by the year 2014, and would include approximately 820,000 gross square feet (s.f.) of commercial office space and hotel on the Pentagon Towers.site along with 850 residential units and 29,000 gross s.f. of retail on the Pentagon Quads site. The primary objective of the traffic analysis is to determine the expected impacts of these developments on nearby intersections and the roadway network. This report represents a preliminary analysis of the Pentagon Park redevelopment, based on land use and site plan information at the Master Plan level of detail. It is intended to identify the key traffic issues associated with the development and serve as a basis for discussion and design parameters as the project moves into the detailed site plan phase. This report documents the existing traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site, estimates the traffic generated by the developments as they are currently proposed, distributes and assigns these trips to the adjacent roadway system, and evaluates the traffic operations of key intersections near the site and those providing access to and from the site. Based on the analysis, the report evaluates mitigating roadway and/or traffic control measures to accommodate future traffic levels in the system. The Gateway Study Area Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) covering both the Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quads sites has already been prepared and encompasses a larger area of redevelopment in the City of Edina. The type and density of development proposed for the Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quads sites most closely resembles the development included in Scenario 2 of the AUAR. This Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) will therefore assist in the identification of the specific proposed mitigation measures recommended in the AUAR that would be needed to accommodate the increased traffic specifically due to the Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quads redevelopment. 2.0 STUDY AREA The study area for this TIA is generally bounded by TH 100 to the west, I -494 to the south, France Avenue to the east, and W 76`h Street to the north. The land uses in this area currently consist of a mix of light industriaVwarehouse, commercial, office, and residential uses that are 60 to 100 percent occupied, with the exception of Pentagon Tower SE, which is currently unoccupied. The proposed developments include the Pentagon Towers site, in the southeast quadrant of W 77`h Street and TH 100, which will include 740,000 s.f. of office /retail development and a 150 -room hotel. The Pentagon Quads site, located in the northwest quadrant of W 77`h Street and Parklawn Avenue, will include retail, townhomes, senior independent living units, assisted living, nursing, and memory care. The study area for this analysis includes the following key intersections: • W77 h Street / TH 100 NB • W 77`h Street / Pentagon Towers access • W77 1h Street / Computer Avenue • Viking Drive / TH 100 Frontage Road • Viking Drive / Computer Avenue • TH 100 Frontage Road / Pentagon Towers access • Viking Drive / West Pentagon Towers access Edina Gateway Study — Pentagon Towers and Quads Traffic Impact Study • Viking Drive / East Pentagon Towers access • Computer Avenue / Pentagon Towers access • Three internal intersections on the Pentagon Towers site • W 77`h Street / Parklawn Avenue • W 77`h Street / West Pentagon Quads access • W 77`h Street / East Pentagon Quads access • Parklawn Avenue / Pentagon Quads access • W 77`h Street / Minnesota Avenue / Johnson Avenue It should be noted that although the level of service (LOS) results and queues are being reported and discussed for the 17 intersections listed above, the analysis was based on the traffic model developed for the Gateway AUAR, which includes 10 additional intersections on France Avenue and Bush Lake Road. The inclusion of these intersections in the analysis gives a clear picture of any system congestion that may impact the operations at the study site. The primary external access to the Pentagon Towers site will be provided by the center north/south roadway that intersects with W 77`h Street and Viking Drive. In order to provide efficient access to the two parking ramps on the Pentagon Towers site and distribute the traffic onto the surrounding roadway network, each ramp will have two entry/exit points, as shown on Sheets T -2 and T -3, including direct access from the east ramp onto Computer Avenue. Access to the hotel will be on Normandale Road with a secondary access from the hotel drive into the west parking ramp. External access to the Pentagon Quads will be via two accesses on W 77`h Street and one access on Parklawn Avenue, with internal circulation provided by a primary east -west roadway and both east -west and north -south walkways to provide pedestrian circulation throughout the site. 2.1 EXISTING LAND USE The study area currently contains a mixture of light industrial/warehouse, commercial, office, and residential uses. The existing trip generation of the Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quads sites, as included in the AUAR, are shown in Table 1. Table 1. Existing? THD Generation. Land Use ITE Land Use Size Units Occupancy Time of Day Trip Rate Trip Generation Total In Out % Trips % Trips Pentagon Tower 710 142,876 sf 69.3% Daily 11.01 1090 50 545 50 545 AM Peak 1.55 153 88 135 12 18 PM Peak 1.49 148 17 25 83 123 Pentagon Tower SE 1 710 25,620 sf 1 0.0% Daily 11.01 0 50 0 50 0 AM Peak 1.55 1 0 88 1 0 12 0 PM Peak 1.49 1 0 17 1 0 83 0 Gateway Towers Site Total Trips Daily 1,090 545 545 AM Peak 153 135 18 ' PM Peak 1 148 25 123 Pentagon Quads I 710 1 297,054 1 sf 1 60.0% Daily 11.01 1962 50 981 50 981 AM Peak 1.55 1 276 88 1 243 12 33 1 PM Peak 1.49 1 266 17 1 45 83 221 Senior Living Center Total Trips Daily 1,962 981 981 AM Peak 276 243 33 PM Peak 266 45 221 912812007 10:22:00 AM page - 1 - 2.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND TRAFFIC Existing traffic counts were conducted for the Gateway Study Area AUAR from January through May 2007, with the exception of the counts at the Computer Avenue / Viking Drive and Viking Drive / TH 100 Frontage Road that were conducted in August 2005. Only the PM peak hour counts were available for these two intersections, so the AM peak hour counts were estimated based on the counts at adjacent intersections. 3.0 TRIP GENERATION Traffic generation for the proposed redevelopment was determined using information provided by Miller Dunwiddie Architecture that documents the planned land uses at the Master Plan Level. For this analysis, it was assumed that 10 percent of the gross square footage of the Pentagon Towers site (72,000 s.f.) would be retail. This is a conservative estimate for the purposes of the traffic analysis, as it is proposed that only the first floor of each building would be used for retail, and retail uses generally have greater trip generation rates than office uses. Expected post - development traffic volumes were determined for the AM and PM peak hours at each of the key intersections. The traffic forecasts were developed by adding the estimated new development traffic to the background traffic that was estimated in the AUAR. Traffic generation for the proposed development was estimated using trip generation rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual. The ITE Trip Generation Manual also provides directional trip distributions that give the percentages of vehicles entering and exiting the site based on the proposed land use. The estimated net trip generation for the proposed development is shown in Table 2. 1 Trip Generation Manual, Seventh Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D. C., 2003 Edina Gateway Study — Pentagon Towers and Quads Traffic Impact Study Table 2. Proposed Trip Generation. Land Use ITE Land Use Size Units Time of Day Trip Rate Trip Generation Total In Out % Trips % Trips Office 710 192,000 sf Daily 11.01 2114 1 50 1057 50 1057 AM Peak 1.55 298 88 262 12 36 PM Peak 1.49 286 17 49 83 237 Office 710 227,000 sf Daily 11.01 2499 50 1250 50 1250 AM Peak 1.55 352 88 310 12 42 PM Peak 1.49 338 17 57 83 281 Office 710 247,000 sf Daily 11.01 2719 50 1360 50 1360 AM Peak 1.55 383 88 337 12 46 PM Peak 1.49 368 17 63 83 305 Retail - Towers Site (assume 10% 814 74,000 sf Daily 44.32 3280 50 1640 50 1640 AM Peak 6.84 506 48 243 52 263 PM Peak 5.02 371 56 208 44 163 Internal Retail Trips Dail -787 -394 -394 AM Peak -101 -49 -53 PM Peak -89 -50 -39 Hotel 310 150 Rooms Daily 8.17 1226 50 613 50 613 AM Peak 0.52 78 55 43 45 35 PM Peak 0.61 92 58 53 42 39 Gateway Towers Proposed Trip Generation Daily 11,051 5,526 5,526 AM Peak 1,516 1,146 369 PM Peak 1,366 380 986 Gateway /Tiowers)Site)Tiotall (Prop:,Tirip) Generation )- �Ezist ?,Ti.ip)Generation)) Dail / 919611 4�,96)11 4;99,1I AM)Peakt 11,3631 110111) 35,11 PMI Peaks I 11,2581 3551 8631 Senior Adult Housing - Attached 252 850 Units Daily 3.48 2,958 50 1,479 50 1,479 AM Peak 0.06 51 50 26 50 26 PM Peak 0.11 94 53 50 47 44 Retail - Senior Housina 814 29,000 sf Daily 44.32 1,285 50 643 50 643 AM Peak 6.84 198 48 95 52 103 PM Peak 5.02 1 146 56 82 44 64 Internal Retail Trips Dail -488 -244 -244 AM Peak -67 -32 -35 PM Peak -77 -43 -34 Senior Living Center Proposed Trip Generation Daily 3,755 1,878 1,878 AM Peak 182 89 94 PM Peak 163 89 74 Senior III Win Center,Tbtal) 9) ( Prop:, Trip) Generation) -- Ezist ?,Tirip)Generatlon)) Dail`/ 11,-7,931 89.71 897/ AMIPeaks 94! - 1'54!, 6,1! PMI Peaks 1;031 44; 1.471 4.0 TRIP DISTRIBUTION The directional distribution of trips generated by the proposed development onto the local and regional roadway network were taken directly from the trip distribution developed for the Gateway AUAR using the 2000 Metropolitan Travel Demand Model. 912812007 10.22:00 AM page - 2 - 5.0 PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES 5.1 HISTORIC TRAFFIC GROWTH Historic traffic growth is the increase in the volume of traffic due to usage increases and non - specific growth throughout -an area.. The Gateway Area AUAR used a background growth rate of through volumes of 1 percent per year, which is appropriate for an inner -ring suburb that is fully built out. This study used the 2014 No Build volumes from the AUAR as a basis for the projected 2014 Build volumes. 5.2 TRIP ASSIGNMENT I FORECAST VOLUMES The estimated trip generation associated with the proposed development was added to the 2014 No Build volumes, which account for background traffic growth, to develop total traffic volumes for 2014. Internal circulation on the Pentagon Towers and Quads sites was determined based on parking availability and the relative sizes of the office and residential buildings. The final step of the traffic forecasting process was to assign the estimated new external site - generated trips to the surrounding roadway system based on the directional trip distribution of traffic. A hand assignment of the estimated trips was performed for each intersection turn movement within the study area. This method assigns the future vehicle trips to the most logical travel route, for both arriving and departing directions, and takes into account the following: • Directional access to local and regional roadways • Intersection control • Roadway characteristics Applying the new development trips to the background traffic produces the estimated post - development traffic volumes. 6.0 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Capacity analyses for the intersections within the study area were performed for the weekday AM and weekday PM peak hours for the following scenarios: • Existing (2007) • No -Build (2014) • Build (2014) In order to determine the impacts of proposed developments on the transportation network, a traffic operations analysis was performed on the surrounding roadway network. The analysis process included determining level of service and queue lengths at each of the key intersections for existing, future, and post - development conditions. The approach to the traffic operations analysis is derived from the established methodologies documented in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). The HCM contains a series of analysis techniques that are used to evaluate the operations of transportation facilities under specified conditions. The Gateway AUAR traffic models developed in Edina Gateway Study – Pentagon Towers and Quads Traffic Impact Study Synchro, a software package that implements the HCM methodologies, were also used for this TIA in order to be consistent with the previous analyses. The inputs into the Synchro model include lane geometrics, turn movement volumes, traffic control, and signal timing characteristics in the study area. This information was then transferred to SimTraffic 7, the traffic simulation model, to produce the analysis results for each intersection. SimTraffic. is a microscopic computer model that. simulates. each individual vehicle's characteristics and behavior in response to traffic volumes, signal operations, turning movements, pedestrians, and intersection configuration. The model can simulate drivers' behaviors and responses to surrounding traffic flow as well as different vehicle types and speeds. It can reasonably estimate vehicle delay and queue lengths at intersections and can create visual animations of the traffic operations. In this study, as in the Gateway AUAR, SimTraffic was used to report results for all intersections in the study. By simulating the individual vehicles, SimTraffic is able to most closely approximate the impacts of queuing at adjacent intersections. One of the primary measures of effectiveness used to evaluate intersection traffic operations, as defined in the HCM, is level of service (LOS) —a qualitative letter grade (A -F) based on seconds of vehicle delay due to the traffic control device at an intersection. By definition, LOS A conditions represent high -quality operations (i.e., motorists experience very little delay or interference) and LOS F conditions represent very poor operations (i.e., extreme delay or severe congestion). In accordance with the Minnesota Department of Transportation guidelines, this study used the LOS D/E boundary as an indicator of acceptable traffic operations. Figure 1 displays the LOS thresholds for signalized and unsignalized intersections. Figure 1. Highway Capacity Manual Level of Service Criteria. 912812007 10:22:00 AM page - 3 - 100 eeererrer« esoe •rrri• MA� <er�r•rr. �'�rr 4r •e,r q �r� o' r�1•r ••,• gr0•'r�� r0'•' r r r'r..•' rr< ��i ,rFreeee reer° e <re eeee BEe�¢ ,«fie . r e•°rre rFar .• '''r ;r :❖rrrr •rr.•. rr rr•• rrE�r rr�'• rr rr • r • •'•' ,ee r.•rrr ;�0000 °roorrrer:•r r o �i: 90 $rrrrr mr • • • • • •; o �r r. £ r. �r°FrrFrd•� 8A r .•rrr • r..•...•.' LOS F r °�qo° r rq, r.°d;' rr r�rrrFr�•b1'•:�• �°•; °��M�Ae°r$°r+°r��� ��i� •q:S•rr. `r rrree..•. �•. ir�:a rrrrrr °<r° rrrr�e.•w �: ?� LOS F rr'•'r.s`. 80 LOSE roo ;�o:��qr°°•� ?.°•i•:r°•:rn�a°•. ,: ,�rrr.•.� .r.•r.•.•.•rrr.•rrrr.• «r $ rrrr.•o.•r rrrorr 0 70 LOS D s LOS E LOS C 80 .......................... ......... . . . ..:....... c 0 d LOS A so a m m 0 40 0 Q30 20 LOS C 10 0, Signalized Unsignalized Figure 1. Highway Capacity Manual Level of Service Criteria. 912812007 10:22:00 AM page - 3 - �.•' �•eeeereea❖ e eeererrer« esoe •rrri• MA� <er�r•rr. �'�rr 4r •e,r q �r� o' r�1•r ••,• gr0•'r�� r0'•' r r r'r..•' rr< ��i ,rFreeee reer° e <re eeee BEe�¢ ,«fie . r e•°rre rFar .• '''r ;r :❖rrrr •rr.•. rr rr•• rrE�r rr�'• rr rr • r • •'•' ,ee r.•rrr ;�0000 °roorrrer:•r r o �i: $rrrrr mr • • • • • •; o �r r. £ r. �r°FrrFrd•� 8A r .•rrr • r..•...•.' rrrrr�r��rrrr�o• °ro °OOb^F.;0000000 r r °�qo° r rq, r.°d;' rr r�rrrFr�•b1'•:�• �°•; °��M�Ae°r$°r+°r��� ��i� •q:S•rr. `r rrree..•. �•. ir�:a rrrrrr °<r° rrrr�e.•w �: ?� LOS F rr'•'r.s`. LOSE roo ;�o:��qr°°•� ?.°•i•:r°•:rn�a°•. ,: ,�rrr.•.� .r.•r.•.•.•rrr.•rrrr.• «r $ rrrr.•o.•r rrrorr LOS D LOS E LOS C .......................... ......... . . . ..:....... LOS A LOS A Figure 1. Highway Capacity Manual Level of Service Criteria. 912812007 10:22:00 AM page - 3 - 6.12007 EXISTING OPERATIONS In the AM peak hour, the existing conditions analysis showed that all intersections and movements in the study area operate at LOS D or better. However, it was noted that the W 76`h Street / France Avenue and W 78`h Street / France Avenue intersections had NB left -turn movements that operated at LOS E. In the PM peak hour, the existing conditions analysis showed that the EB through and right -turn movements at the W 77`h Street / TH 100 SB intersection and the EB left -turn and through movements at the W 77`h Street/ TH 100 NB intersection operate at LOS F. Also, several intersections adjacent to the study area had LOS E operations in the existing conditions. The Minnesota Drive / France Avenue intersection, which is approximately 1,290 feet east of the W77 th Street / Minnesota Drive / Johnson Avenue intersection, was shown to operate at LOS F, with the EB, WB, and SB movements operating at LOS F. The WB through movements had 95`h percentile queues` of close to 1,500 feet and the EB through movements had 95`h percentile queues of more than 600 feet. This congestion on Minnesota Drive is due to the significant congestion and queuing on France Avenue, which receives the majority of the signal green time but still operates with significant congestion and queuing due to the very high volume of vehicles on France Avenue in the peak hours. 6.2 2014 NO BUILD OPERATIONS In the 2014 AM No Build scenario it was noted that the EB and WB through movements, as well as the NB left - turn turn movement, at the Minnesota Drive / France Avenue intersection operated at LOS F, with an overall intersection LOS E. In addition, the EB left -turn and WB through and left -turn movements would be expected to operate at LOS F at the W 78`h Street / France Avenue intersection. The AUAR discussed modifying the lane assignment on southbound France Avenue at the intersection to provide exclusive lanes to westbound and eastbound I -494, but that improvement would be expected to have secondary benefits for the eastbound and westbound movements at the intersection. In the 2014 No Build PM peak hour at the W 77th Street / TH 100 NB intersection, the analysis showed that the WB right -turn movement had queuing that spilled back past the W 77th Street / Computer Avenue intersection. The queue spillback blocked the W 77`h Street / Pentagon Towers access and W 77`h Street / Computer Avenue upstream intersections and inhibited the turning movements from the cross streets onto W 77`h Street. The AUAR identified this issue in all development scenarios and the recommended mitigation was to build a second WB right -turn lane at TH 100 NB to accommodate the 741 right- turning vehicles expected in the 2014 No Build PM peak hour. Also in the PM peak, the eastbound left turn lane at the W 77`h Street/TH 100 NB intersection operated at LOS F with queuing past the end of the turn lane that failed to clear during each signal cycle. This issue was noted, although it is not a critical movement for the proposed redevelopment. The 95`h percentile queue is defined as the queue length that would be exceeded only 5 percent of the time and is the standard queuing measure that is evaluated in traffic operations. Edina Gateway Study — Pentagon Towers and Quads Traffic Impact Study 6.3 2014 BUILD OPERATIONS The 2014 Build operations assumed that signal timing optimization would be necessary at most intersections within the study area to accommodate background traffic growth and traffic pattern changes. The same issues identified in the 2014 No Build AM peak hour also occur in the 2014 Build scenario. All other intersections operate at LOS D or better. In the analysis of the 2014 Build PM peak hour at the W 77th Street / TH 100 NB intersection, the WB right -turn queue extended past Computer Avenue, which blocked the NB left -turn movement out of the Pentagon Towers site and caused additional delay for the NB left -turn movement from Computer Avenue to W 77th Street. The AUAR recommended adding a second NB left -turn lane from Computer Avenue to W 77`h Street to improve the left -turn LOS and reduce the queuing. However, the NB left -turn volume is expected to be 275 vehicles in the PM peak hour, which would not warrant a dual left - turn lane configuration in terms of capacity needs. The addition of a second WB right -turn lane at the W 77th Street / TH 100 NB intersection, as recommended in the AUAR, would be expected to at least partially address both the left -turn operational issues from the Pentagon Towers access and the Computer Avenue intersection: the operations of the NB left -turn from the Pentagon Towers access would be significantly improved and the queuing of the NB left -turn movement from Computer Avenue to W 77`h Street would also be reduced. The AUAR 2014 Synchro model shows the W 77`h Street / Pentagon Towers access and W 77`h Street / Computer Avenue signals operating semi- actuated/uncoordinated, which contradicts other information from the City of Edina indicating that these signals are interconnected and coordinated. More analysis is needed to determine what impact the lack of coordination in the model has on the LOS and queuing at these two intersections. However, from a purely capacity perspective, dual NB left -turn lanes at W 77`h Street / Computer Avenue would not be necessary given that the projected peak hour NB left -turn volume is 275 vehicles and the projected volume on the entire approach is only about 400 total vehicles. If the second WB right -turn lane at the W 77th Street / TH 100 NB intersection was not built, northbound left turns out of the Pentagon Towers site onto W 77th Street may need to be restricted to avoid significant congestion and queuing on the interior roadways of the Pentagon Towers site. If the left -turns out of the site were restricted, northbound through and right - turn movements at the W 77`h Street / Pentagon Towers access could still be allowed, as well as all southbound movements. Also at the W 77th Street / TH 100 NB intersection, the EB left -turn movement had LOS F operations and the WB through movement had LOS E operations in the PM peak hour under both the No -Build and Build scenarios because the overall intersection had a volume /capacity (v /c) ratio greater than 1. Implementing the additional mitigation measures in the AUAR (exclusive NB and EB right -turn lanes) would improve the overall intersection operations.to LOS D with a maximum v/c ratio of 0.9, which would vary depending on the exact parameters of the signal timing optimization. Also in the 2014 Build PM peak hour, the analysis at the W 77th Street / Minnesota Drive / Johnson Avenue intersection showed that the SB left -turn operated at LOS D/E and the average queue spilled back out of the turn lane. The Gateway AUAR Scenario 2 also identified this issue and recommended constructing a second SB left -turn lane on W 77`h Street. However, the second SB left -turn lane at the W 77th Street / Minnesota Drive / Johnson Avenue would not solve the other 912812007 10:22:00 AM page - 4 - underlying issue, which is the congestion and very long queues on Minnesota Drive at the France Avenue intersection. The poor operations and long queues on France Avenue cause significant queuing for EB vehicles on Minnesota Drive even in the existing conditions, so addressing the SB left -turn capacity issue at W 77`h Street / Minnesota Drive / Johnson Avenue would improve the operations at that intersection but would not completely alleviate the issues on EB Minnesota Drive. The internal circulation for the Pentagon Towers site is sufficient to accommodate the approximately 3,000 proposed ramp parking spaces. In the AM peak, there are expected to be approximately 1,150 entering vehicles and in the PM peak, there are expected to be 990 exiting vehicles. No speed ramps are necessary to accommodate these traffic volumes. The ability for vehicles to efficiently enter and exit the ramps will be dependent primarily on: the internal circulation of the ramps, the enter /exit demand being spread throughout the peak hour (through travel demand management strategies such as staggered start times), and the control strategy for the ramp. With regard to control, an automatic vehicle identification (AVI) gate system can process 8 vehicles per lane per minute, or 480 vehicles per hour per lane. This would mean providing 3 -4 total exit lanes (over the 2 access points) for the larger 1,700 -space ramp and 3 total exit lanes (over the 2 access points) for the 1,300 -space ramp to accommodate 3,000 exiting vehicles. It should be noted that from a trip generation perspective, there is no scenario in which 3,000 vehicles would be expected to enter or exit the ramps in a single peak hour. It is understood that no parking system with pay -at -exit control is currently being proposed for this project, which is important because a cashier at exit can only accommodate 2 vehicles per lane per minute, or 120 vehicles per hour per lane. This type of system on the Pentagon Towers site could cause significant internal congestion in the ramp, depending on the mix of monthly employee parking versus visitor parking and how these different traffic streams were separated or processed. As the pay -at -exit control strategy is not being considered, no issues are anticipated regarding the internal circulation or congestion within the ramps and no speed ramps are expected to be needed. The impacts of the specific ramp control strategy chosen will be considered when moving forward with the design to ensure that the ramps and the internal circulation roadways of the Pentagon Towers site operate efficiently. 7.0 TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT As mentioned in the 2014 Build Operations discussion, travel demand management plan strategies will be necessary to accommodate the peak hour traffic demands on the roadway network as well as within the development sites, articularly Pentagon Towers. A complete Travel Demand Management Plan will be developed and submitted to the City at the Final Site Plan stage of the project. The focus of the Travel Demand Management Plan will be to outline measures to encourage residents, employees, and visitors of the Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quads redevelopments to use alternative modes of transportation and to make trips outside the peak hours. Some of the strategies that may be incorporated into the Travel Demand Management Plan include: Provide improved ADA- compliant transit shelters on or adjacent to the development sites for the existing Metro Transit bus routes (6, 540, and 578) that currently run along W 77`h Street and Parklawn Avenue and provide direct service to downtown Minneapolis, the University of Minnesota, Edina, Richfield, and Bloomington. Edina Gateway Study — Pentagon Towers and Quads Traffic Impact Study • Provide secure bike racks or bike lockers for employees, residents, and visitors at key entrance locations. • Restrict large delivery vehicles to accessing the sites outside the AM and PM peak traffic periods. • Support and promote car and vanpooling by employees. • Provide information on transportation alternatives including bus route map and schedules, flex -car programs, flexible work schedules, staggered work hours, and telecommuting. 8.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the findings of this analysis, the following roadway improvements are expected to be necessary into the future to accommodate redevelopment at the Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quads sites: • W 77`h Street / TH 100 NB • Construct second WB right -turn lane • Construct exclusive EB and NB right -turn lanes • Adjust signal phasing to provide concurrent NB /SB left -turn movements . W 77`h Street / Minnesota Drive / Johnson Ave o Construct second SB left -turn lane In general, the signal timing plans for the W 77`h Street and France Avenue corridors should be optimized, including cycle lengths, phase splits, coordinated offsets, and other parameters as traffic volumes in the area grow. By the year 2014, the capacity on France Avenue is expected to be insufficient and improvements are anticipated to be necessary in the 2014 No- Build conditions, regardless of the redevelopment of the Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quads sites. 912812007 10:22:00 AM page - 5 - LEGEND STOP STOP SIGM TRAFnc sor.NAL 621L 2 - — ) '11-� I 0 V(] v 4-V Y Edina Gateway Study — Pentagon Towers and Quads Traffic Impact Study r Z0 0 Qi�� `� ,r'�rrr'�'! I I I I I I I U It'_ L."1111I[IUUr11U IIJIIUIIIIIIICII IIICII111CII1111111I1]III v0 SHEET T -2: SITE CIRCULATION AND ACCESS DIAGRAM qjl J r t r J I�1 4 Z L7 a eL Ll o0 ra - - cn � LLI = n- 1,.1 r OL . � 1 0 V { � pper. )p nf LJLJI 0 W U) r;iU) o� �v � C) U)< 912812007 10:22:00 AM page - 6 - u - C a T _ � ICI IJ l 1111111111 1 1 � ��rl! �!ly14111111�ll lr lrllll� p A 1 r qjl J r t r J I�1 4 Z L7 a eL Ll o0 ra - - cn � LLI = n- 1,.1 r OL . � 1 0 V { � pper. )p nf LJLJI 0 W U) r;iU) o� �v � C) U)< 912812007 10:22:00 AM page - 6 -