Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2007-11-05_COUNCIL MEETING
I Memo To: City Council and Planning Commission From: Wayne Houle, City Engineer Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager CC: Gordon Hughes, City Manager Date: 11/05/07 Re: Public Works Facility Relocation Proposals On October 12, 2007, staff received two proposals for the relocation and redevelopment of the Edina Public Works Facility. The two proposals are from Opus and Ryan Companies. Opus proposed a relocation of the Public Works facility to the current Con Agra Foods site at 7450 74th Avenue, in the industrial area of the city's southwest comer. Ryan Companies proposed the Gabberts warehouse site, located at 7215 Cahill Road. The RFP required the following information to be submitted: 1. A description of previous development experience. 2. Qualifications of the development team including the owner /developer, project manager, architect, site planner and any other major entities of the development. 3. A description of the developer's financial. strength and a preliminary financial analysis which describes the contemplated project financing including proposed public financial participation, if any. 4. A conceptual plan and narrative which depicts the proposed land use, the intensity of development, the development's relationship to surrounding properties and a proposed development schedule. The conceptual plan need not include schematic design or elevations but should be sufficiently detailed to allow the City to understand the development concept. 1 5. Survey of proposed site for relocated Public Works Facility, and relevant building drawings. 6. Developer should be able to demonstrate that the proposed site for the relocated Public Works Facility is legally controlled or owned by the developer. Process: The RFP envisioned a two -step process. Step 1 was to be the submission of qualifications and conceptual plans. We anticipated that the Council would then select a developer as a finalist, and then that developer would submit more detailed plans and financial analysis. Summary and Analvsis We have prepared the attached summaries and analyses to assist the Council in evaluating the proposals. Each summary and analysis contains the following information: Development Team: A listing of the identified members of the development team, including architects, site planners and so forth. In addition, we have described the qualifications of the owner /developer and offered any experience we have had with respect to past projects in Edina with this developer. Development Concept: A brief description of the proposed development including its special features. Proposed Purchase Price: The total proposed purchase price of the Site. Only one of the proposals included financial analysis, that of Opus. The Ryan Companies proposal did not include any financial information, other than an estimate of price per square foot of the finished building of either $215 or $230 per square foot. For purposes of this review, we have assembled the following information taken from the Opus proposal: Land $4,100,000 (Based on a 150,000 square foot office building and includes $100,000 of estimated soft costs) Building $19,700,000 Office Building Parking Ramp $11,250.,000 (Office building ramp estimate is based on five levels that accommodate approximately 750 cars) 2 Park and Ride Ramp $2,250,000 (Park and Ride ramp estimate is based on one additional level that accommodates approximately 150 cars. It is assumed that Park and Ride ramp costs are reimbursed by Metro Transit) Development/Soft Costs $4,900,000 Total $42,200,000 Tax Increment Estimate $4,675,000 (Tax increment is based on estimates by Holmes and Associates. Based upon a 7.5% net present value of $5.5 million and capitalization costs of 15% or $825,000. Capitalization costs include cost of issuance, capitalized interest and debt service reserves associated with the marketing of a PAYGO note) Strengths and Weaknesses of Proposals: The strengths and weaknesses of the proposal as identified by the staff. Our comments in this respect are based primarily upon the proposals' response to the development objectives identified in the RFP. The Council received the two proposals in the last Council packet — please bring these to the work session. We will be glad to provide additional information at your request. Opus Development Team: Owner /Developer: Tom Lund, Opus Opus is an experienced multi - family, commercial and industrial developer with 54 years of experience, and over 2,300 successfully completed projects. In 2001, Opus completed the office building, park and senior center /library at Grandview Square. In addition, Opus developed the Edina Corporate Center located at Hwy. 100 and W. 77th Street, and the Interlachen Corporate Center on Hwy. 169, both in Edina. Tom Lund is a Senior Director in Real Estate Development and a resident of Edina. Development Concept: Opus proposes to construct a roughly 150,000 square foot, five story office building primarily occupied by General Practitioners and Medical Specialists. The site will include a five -level concrete structure with approximately 150 cars per level for a total of about 750 cars. Access to the ramp on the lower level will be from Eden Avenue via a covered drop -off area. The ramp can also be designed to accommodate an additional level for Metro Transit Park and Ride with up to 150 additional parking spaces. Proposed Purchase Price: $4,100,000 Strengths of Proposal: • Better compatibility of use with surrounding commercial /retail uses at Hwy. 100 and Vernon. • Utilizes unique topography of the site for parking. • Intensification of use is appropriate for area adjacent to major highway • Access for this site is better suited to a commercial use, rather than a fleet use such as Public Works Weaknesses of Proposal: Proposal includes only one type of use, office, rather than a mixed -use approach Proposal would need a variance. The proposal calls for five stories; only four stories are permitted. Public Works Relocation Analysis: The following attributes were required in the relocation facility or site: The new Public Works site shall be located within the City of Edina within any of the Planned Industrial Zone as defined on the City Zoning Map. The site shall be 7 acres minimum. If the site has an existing building that can be remodeled, it must be at least 110,000 square feet. The building and site should be able to accommodate the following: • Office Area and lunchroom (6,000 to 10,000 square feet) • Locker room (2000 square feet) • Vehicle maintenance shop (12,000 square feet) • Vehicle / Equipment Storage (58,000 square feet) o To accommodate storage and efficient access for tandem and single axle snow plow trucks, graders, trucks with trailers, sewer cleaning equipment, etc. • Wash bay (50 feet x 15 feet) • Shops — parks, carpenter, utility, traffic control, and electrical (1300 square feet each) • Site area: • Approximately 120 Parking spaces • Salt Storage Building • Fueling island • Storm water treatment pond Site and Building Analysis Meets Does Not Comments Meet Site Size X * Barely meets requirements • Limited on -site storage • Access into building compromised since the floor is elevated above grade * Fueling island will work on site Building X * Does not meet projected space needs Size but better than Ryan site Office Area X * Office area is easily adaptable * Additional daylighting desirable Locker X * Readily adaptable to existing space Room Vehicle X * Access to bays is compromised Maintenance * Floor drains need to be added * Cranes and lifts difficult to include * Some OH door sizes inadequate Vehicle X * Only 70% of the vehicles can be Storage stored in remaining space * Floor drains need to be added * 80% efficient with existing column spacing after significant retrofit work * Some OH door sizes inadequate Wash Bay X * Can be accommodated / added Shops X * Can be accommodated Site Area X Other * Requires more energy - related retrofit than the Ryan site (i.e., insulation) *Requires much more structural retrofit/ internal demolition than the Ryan site Ryan Companies Development Team: Owner /Developer: Eric Anderson, Ryan Companies Joel Schurke, Ryan Companies Ryan Companies has 69 years of experience in commercial and retail construction. Ryan has worked most recently in Edina on the Westin Galleria project, an 18 -story hotel /condominium complex with structured parking at 70th and York. Ryan frequently does "design- build" projects utilizing a multi- disciplinary team, and was voted "Developer of the Year" in 2007 by NAIOP (National Association of Industrial and Office Properties). Development Concept: Ryan proposes two development concepts for the Public Works Site: 1) Surface parked Medical Office /Professional Office, with a two -story building, utilizing only surface parking on the site. Approximately 47,000 square feet, sited to the South to maximize the view towards Eden Avenue. 2) One -level parking ramp with 70,000 square foot, three -story building. Parking would be at the rear of the building. Estimated Development Costs: $10,105,000 (Concept 1, $215/sf). $16,100,000 (Concept 2, $230 /sf) Proposed Purchase Price: No proposed purchase price given. Strengths of Proposal: • Proposed use is compatible with surrounding land uses • Access for this site is better suited to a commercial use, rather than a fleet use such as Public Works • Utilizes unique topography of the site for parking. Weaknesses of Proposal: • Does not intensify land use in keeping with location on major highway • Does not include park and ride component, which will lessen impact on surrounding roadways • Proposal includes only one type of use, office, rather than a mixed -use approach Site and Building Analysis Meets Does Not Comments Meet Site Size X * Insufficient staff parking • Limitations due to utility easements • No location for salt building • Access into building difficult since the floor is elevated above grade * Virtually no on -site storage * Fueling island will work on site Building X * Does not meet projected space needs Size Office Area X * 2 story space requires new elevator * Additional windows necessary Locker X * Readily adaptable to existing space Room Vehicle X * Access to bays is complicated Maintenance * Floor drains need to be added * Cranes and lifts difficult to include * OH door size inadequate Vehicle X * Only 45% of the vehicles can be Storage stored in remaining space * Floor drains need to be added * 80% efficient with existing column spacing * OH door size inadequate Wash Bay X * Can be accommodated Shops X * Can be accommodated Site Area X EDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING PROCEDURES During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public comment after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to speak on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your comments are relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: • Individuals must limit their presentations to three minutes. The Mayor will modify presentation times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit comments to the matter under consideration. • In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. During "Public Comments," the Mayor will ask to hear from those in attendance who would like to speak about something not on the agenda. Individuals must limit their presentations to three minutes and cannot speak to an issue for which a public hearing was previously held and closed or a matter scheduled for a future hearing. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments. Instead, the Council might direct the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 5, 2007 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of Oct. 16, 2007 II. SET PUBLIC HEARING DATE (12/04/07 - Volunteer of America Revenue Bonds * III. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre List dated November 1, 2007, TOTAL $21,337.50. IV. ADTOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL MINNESOTA CHEMICAL HEALTH WEEK PROCLAIMED - November 12 -18, 2007 Agenda /Edina City Council November 5, 2007 Page 2 AMERICA RECYCLES DAY PROCLAIMED - November 15, 2007 * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of October 16, 2007 and Work Session of October 16, 2007 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Zoning Ordinances: First Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three Council members except that a rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Second Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three of Council to pass except rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall votes of four members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Affirmative rollcall vote of three ' Council members required passing. Conditional Use Permit: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required to pass. Variance Appeal: Favorable rollcall of Council Members present to uphold or deny appeal * A. SET HEARING DATE (11/20/07) - Ordinance Amendment to Subsections 850.11 Regarding Building Height In The R -1 Zoning Dist and Subsection 850.21 Regarding An Amendment To The City's Flood Insurance Rate Map B. PUBLIC HEARING FINAL (AUAR) - Gateway Project Alternative Urban Areawide Review - Resolution No. 2007 -121 * C. LOT DIVISIONS 1. 5216 Malibu Drive - Resolution No. 2007 -113 2. 5305 Malibu Drive - Resolution No. 2007 -114 3. 5309 Malibu Drive - Resolution No. 2007 -115 4. 5317 Malibu Drive - Resolution No. 2007 -116 5. 7015 McCauley Trail - Resolution No. 2007 -117 6. 7021 McCauley Trail - Resolution No. 2007 -118 III. PUBLIC COMMENT IV. AWARD OF BID * A. Contract No. PW 07 -5 Rehabilitation of Well No. 3 * B. Concrete Deck Renovation - Braemar Golf Course V. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS A. Resolution No. 2007 -119 Authorizing City of Edina To Join International Council for Local Environmental Initiative (ICLEI) B. Bike Edina Task Force Report Agenda/ Edina City Council November 5, 2007 Page 3 C. Morningside Water Report D. Edina Dial a Ride * E. Public Health and Environmental Health Mutual Aid Agreement F. Resolution No. 2007 -120 Accepting Various Donations G. 2008 Council Meeting Dates and Holidays * H. Set Hearing Date (12/4/07) Improvement Project No. A -213 & A -214 Country Club Area Sewer, Water & Street Reconstruction - Resolution No. 2007 -122 VI. FINANCE * A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated October 18, 2007 TOTAL $1,540,247.94; and October 25, 2007 TOTAL $1,294,874.30; and dated November 1, 2007 TOTAL $405,578.54, and for Credit Card Transactions TOTAL $4,053.25. B. SET HEARING DATE (12/04/07) -Volunteers of America Revenue Bonds VII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS VIII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS IX. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952- 927 - 886172 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS Tues Nov 6 SCHOOL DISTRICT ELECTION DAY - POLLS OPEN 7 A.M. - 8 P.M. Tues Nov 20 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Thurs Nov 22 THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Fri Nov 23 DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Tues Nov 27 Study Session - To be determined 11:30 A.M. Mon Dec 3 Truth In Taxation Hearing 5:00 P.M. Tues Dec 4 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Dec 18 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Mon Dec 24 CHRISTMAS EVE HOLIDAY OBSERVED- City Hall Closes at Noon Tues Dec 25 CHRISTMAS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Mon Dec 31 NEW YEAR'S DAY EVE HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closes at noon Tues Jan 1 NEW YEAR'S DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Wed Jan 2 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. ues Jan 14 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. ion Jan 21 REV. MARTIN LUTHER KING HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Tues Jan 22 Study Session - To be determined 7:00 A.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM To: Mayor & City Council From: Gordon Hughes City Manager Date: 10/31/07 Subject: Tax Exempt Revenue Bonds - Volunteers of America REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item HRA II. & COUNCIL VI. B. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ® To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adopt attached resolution calling for public hearing on December 4, 2007 Info/Background: Volunteers of America in Minnesota (VOA) has requested that the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) issue $2.5 million in non -profit revenue bonds to facilitate their purchase of 7625 Metro Boulevard. This building would serve as VOA's corporate headquarters. The attached letter from VOA summarizes its request. More information on VOA is available at www.voanm.org. In 1995, the City adopted the attached guidelines for the consideration of tax exempt revenue bonds. While the proposed use of the bond proceeds is lawful, the HRA should decide if the project conforms to the first guideline, i.e. that a significant amount of the proceeds must be used for property improvements or to promote or preserve housing for low and moderate income individuals or families. In this case, neither property improvements nor housing for low and moderate income persons are part of the proposal. However, part of VOA's mission involves such housing and, therefore, it can be argued that use of the bond proceeds will assist in the promotion of housing for low and moderate income persons. Revenue bonds are not backed by the general obligations of the City and repayment is the sole obligation of VOA. The attached memo from the City's bond counsel provides more details. If the HRA wishes to consider this request, staff recommends that a hearing be scheduled for December 4, 2007. i Volunteers of America® Minnesota October 29, 2007 Mr. Gordon Hughes, City Manager City of Edina 4801 W. 50" Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: $2,500,000 City of Edina, Mitmesota HRA Non - Profit Revenue Bonds Volunteers of America in Minnesota Project Dear Mr. Hughes: Volunteers of America in Minnesota formally requests that the City of Edina HRA act as a conduit issuer for the above referenced revenue bonds. The bond proceeds would be used by Volunteers of America in Minnesota to purchase an existing office building at 7625 Metro Boulevard in the City of Edina. Volunteers of America in Minnesota would move its corporate headquarters from leased office space in Golden Valley to the 7625 Metro Boulevard location. Volunteers of America in Minnesota is a leading social services organization. information on our programs and services can be found on our web site www.voamn.org. The bonds would be privately placed by Northland Securities and the interest would be tax - exempt and bank qualified on the opinion of bond counsel, Dorsey & Whitney. The bonds are not a debt of the City of Edina or HRA. The repayment is solely the responsibility of Volunteers of America in Minnesota. Thank you for your support. Sincer y, R ert Lovegrove, CFO Volunteers of America in Minnesota Celebrating 110years ofseruire in Minnesota - wtuwuoan++n.oig Corporate Support Office 5905 Golden Valley Road. Suite 110 - Minneapolis - MN 55422 -4490 - Tel: 763.546.3242 - Fax: 763.546.2774 ilk l I I I, tl 1. A SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF THE BOND PROCEEDS MUSTBE USED FOR PROPERTY IMPROVEMENTS OR TO REFUND PREVIOUSLY ISSUED CITYOF EDINA BONDS OR TO PROMOTEOR PRESERVE HOUSING FOR LOW AND MODERATE INCOME INDIVIDUALS OR FAMILIES. In addition to new construction, public improvements include replacing or rehabilitating basic building systems such as plumbing, electrical, mechanical, structural, energy efficiency improvements, leasehold improvements, or improvements correcting or 'improving accessibility for disabled persons. 2. ALL PROPERTIES RECEIVING REVENUE BOND FINANCING MUST COMPLY WITH URBAN DESIGN STANDARDS. Urban design standards include adequate parking, landscaping, screening, and noise and air quality. 3. REVENUE BONDS WILL ONLY BE ISSUED IF: ® The Bonds bear a rating of at least "A" or an equivalent rating, or ® The Bonds are privately placed, rather than publicly offered, or 0 The Bonds are secured by a letter of credit from a financial institution acceptable to the City or other acceptable security, sufficient at all times to cover debt service, or 0 There is submitted to the City a feasibility study satisfactory to the Council which concludes that sufficient revenues will be generated to cover debt service. 4. THE CITY OF EDINA MAY ISSUE REVENUE BONDS A PORTION OF WHICH BENEFIT PROPERTIES OUTSIDE THE CITY LIMITS SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING: At least 51% of the bond proceeds must be directed to projects within Edina ® A formal request must be received from the City in which the project is located a The City Council must conclude that the use of bond proceeds in another city will not cause a relocation of a business entity or employees from Edina 5. AN ISSUANCE FEE OF UP TO 1/2 PERCENT OF THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF THE BOND ISSUE MUST BE PAID TO THE CITY IN ADDITION TO OTHER COSTS OF ISSUANCE. 6. THE ISSUANCE OF THE REVENUE BONDS MUST NOT ADVERSELY AFFECTTHE CITY'S ABILITY TO ISSUE BANK QUALIFIED BONDS. 7. THE CITY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO SELECT . BOND COUNSEL AND OTHER CONSULTANTS OR ADVISORS WITH RESPECT TO THE E30ND ISSUE. Adoplcd by Ci(v Council on April 3, 1995. MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Commissioners of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Gordon Hughes, Executive Director FROM: Jerome P. Gilligan DATE: November 1, 2007 RE: Proposed Issuance of a Revenue Note for Volunteers of America in Minnesota The Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "HRA ") has received a request from Volunteers of America in Minnesota ( "VOA") that the HRA issue a revenue note under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 469.152 to 469.165, the proceeds of which will be loaned by the HRA to VOA and used to finance the acquisition of an existing building and site located in the City of Edina (the "City ") for use as VOA's headquarters and administrative offices, together with any related construction or reconstruction costs and acquisition and installation of necessary equipment and furnishings. It has been proposed that the HRA Board of Commissioners hold a public hearing on the issuance of the revenue note at its December 4th meeting. The note is proposed to be issued in a principal amount of up to $2,500,000 and it is expected that the ultimate purchaser of the note will be a bank. The reason that the HRA rather than the City is being requested to issue the note is in order that the note can be "bank qualified" under Section 265(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Having the note bank qualified allows a bank to own the note and receive the tax - exempt interest thereon without losing an interest deduction. The HRA and the City may issue bank qualified bonds if such entity will not issue more than $10 million of tax - exempt bonds in a calendar year. The City has already issued bonds in excess of $10 million in 2007, so if the City were to issue the note it could not be bank qualified. However, the HRA has not issued any tax - exempt obligations in 2007 and the City's tax - exempt bonds are not taken into account in determining whether the HRA is eligible to issue bank qualified bonds. The debt service on the note will be payable solely from payments to be made by the VOA, and the HRA will not have any liability with respect to the note. VOA will pay all HRA expenses with respect to the note and upon issuance of the note will pay the HRA a fee in accordance with the City's policy for the issuance of revenue bonds (1/2/ of 1 % of the original principal amount of the note). If the HRA wishes at this time to proceed with the proposed financing the first step is to adopt a resolution calling for a public hearing. Representatives from VOA will attend the November 5th Board of Commissioners meeting to respond to any questions concerning the proposed financing. If the Board of Commissioners wishes to proceed with the issuance of the proposed note following the public hearing, it would then adopt the resolution approving the issuance of the note. In addition, the City Council will need to approve the issuance of the note. The calling for a public hearing on the proposed issuance of the note does not in any manner obligate or commit the HRA to issue the note. CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO REVENUE NOTE (VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA IN MINNESOTA PROJECT) SERIES 2007 Issuer: Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Governing Body: Board of Commissioners Kind, date, time and place of meeting: A regular meeting, held on November 5, 2007, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., at the City Hall, Edina, Minnesota. Commissioners present: Commissioners absent: Documents Attached: Minutes of said meeting (pages): RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -02 RESOLUTION CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED ISSUANCE OF A REVENUE NOTE IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $2,500,000, AT THE REQUEST OF VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA IN MINNESOTA I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the obligations referred to in the title of this certificate, certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of the corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that the documents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of the corporation, and correct and complete copies of all resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents approved by the governing body at the meeting, insofar as they relate to the obligations; and that the meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law. WITNESS my hand officially as such recording officer and the seal of the Issuer this day of November, 2007. Secretary Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -02 RESOLUTION CALLING FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PROPOSED ISSUANCE OF A REVENUE NOTE IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $2,500,000, AT THE REQUEST OF VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA IN MINNESOTA WHEREAS, the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "Issuer ") is a public body corporate and politic of the State of Minnesota, and is authorized and empowered by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 to 469.1651, as amended (the "Act ") to issue revenue bonds or notes and loan the proceeds from the sale of said bonds or notes to one or more parties to be used to defray all or a portion of the cost of acquiring, constructing, improving and equipping authorized projects, as further provided in the Act; and WHEREAS, a proposal has been made to the ,Issuer by Volunteers of America in Minnesota, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (referred to herein as the "Corporation "), and an organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, to authorize the issuance of its revenue bond or note for the purpose of financing a project pursuant to the Act (referred to as the "Project "); and WHEREAS, the Project consists of the acquisition of an existing building and site for use as the Corporation's headquarters and administrative offices, together with any related construction or reconstruction costs and acquisition and installation of necessary equipment and furnishings, if any; and WHEREAS, the funds to, provide financing for the Project would be obtained through the issuance by the Issuer of its Revenue Note (the "Note "), in a principal amount not to exceed $2,500,000, which Note is to be repaid solely and only through payments to be made by the Corporation pursuant to a loan or similar agreement to be entered into between -the Issuer and the Corporation; and WHEREAS, the Note shall be a limited obligation of the Issuer, and shall not constitute nor give rise to a pecuniary liability of the Issuer or a charge against its general credit or taxing powers, and the principal of, interest and premium, if any, on the Note shall be payable solely out of the revenues derived from the loan agreement; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 469.154, Subd. 4, of the Act and Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, as a condition to the issuance of the Note, it is necessary to conduct a public hearing on the issuance of the Note and on the Project, and to publish notice of said public hearing in the official newspaper and a newspaper of general circulation in the municipality not less than 14 nor,more than 30 days prior to the date fixed for the hearing. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of Commissioners of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority, that: 1. A public hearing shall be conducted by the Board of Commissioners on the issuance of said Note and on the Project, such hearing to be held on December 4, 2007, at 7:00 o'clock p.m. in the City Hall, at which hearing all parties who appear shall be given an opportunity to express their views with respect to the issuance of the Note and the Project. 2. Notice of such public hearing, in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, shall be published at least once not less than 14 nor more than 30 days prior to the date fixed for the hearing, in the official newspaper and a newspaper having general circulation in the City of Edina. 3. Officers of the Issuer are hereby authorized to take such further action as may be necessary to carry out the intent and purpose of this Resolution. 4. Any prior resolutions or orders adopted by the City Council, or parts thereof, in conflict herewith are, to the extent of such conflict, hereby repealed, and this Resolution shall be in full force and effect immediately upon its adoption. ATTEST: Linda M. Masica, Secretary James B. Hovland, Chair The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner and, upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon the resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. -2- EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON A PROJECT AND THE PROPOSED ISSUANCE BY THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF A REVENUE NOTE IN A PRINCIPAL AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $2,500,000, AT THE REQUEST OF VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA IN MINNESOTA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing shall be conducted by the Board of Commissioners of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "Issuer"), on a proposal that it issue its Revenue Note, in a principal amount not to exceed $2,500,000 (the "Note "), and on a project to be financed thereby pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 to 469.1651, as amended (the "Act "), all at the request of Volunteers of America in Minnesota, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the "Corporation "). The hearing will be held at City Hall, located at 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota, on Tuesday, December 4, 2007, at 7:00 o'clock p.m. The proposed project to be financed by the Note consists of the acquisition of an existing building and site for use as the Corporation's headquarters and administrative offices, together with any related construction or reconstruction costs and acquisition and installation of necessary equipment and furnishings, if any (all collectively referred to as the "Project "). The address of the Project to be financed by the Note is 7625 Metro Boulevard, Edina, Minnesota. The Project is to be owned and operated by the Corporation. The proceeds of the Note will be loaned by the Issuer to, the Corporation to provide financing for the Project, and the Corporation will agree to repay the loan at times and in amounts sufficient to provide for payment in full of the Note when due. At said time and place the Board of Commissioners shall give all parties who appear an opportunity to express their views with respect to the Project and the issuance of the Note. Written comments will be accepted at the principal offices of the Issuer until the time of hearing. A draft copy of the proposed Application to the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development for approval of the Project, together with all attachments and exhibits thereto, shall be available for public inspection following the publication of this notice of the office of the Executive Director in City Hall during normal business hours, 7:30 o'clock a.m. to 4:00 o'clock p.m. on normal business days. November—, 2007. By /s/ Gordon L. Hughes Its Executive Director STATE OF MINNESOTA ) )ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting Secretary of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority (the "Issuer"), do hereby certify that attached hereto is a compared, true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted by the Board of Commissioners of the Issuer at a regular meeting thereof duly called and held on November 5, 2007, as the same relates to the proposed issuance of a revenue note of the Issuer pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 to 469.1651, as amended, at the request of Volunteers of America in Minnesota, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation; that said meeting was duly and publicly held in accordance with all applicable requirements of law, and that the information set forth in the attached Extract of Minutes with respect thereto is true, complete and correct. WITNESS My hand officially as said Secretary this day of November, 2007. Secretary R55CKREG ,320000 Check # Dale Amount Supplier/ Explanation 13966 111112007 100668 URS CORPORATION 21,337.50 PROMENADE - PLANS & SPECS 21,337.50 21,337.50 Grand Total CITY l JA Council Check Register 11/1/2007 — 11/1/2007 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 173153 3090490 9132.6103 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 21,337.50 Total Payments 21,337.50 1 c 7 8:38:47 Page - 1 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKE TAX DISTRICT R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 11/1/2007 - 11/1/2007 Company Amount 09000 HRA FUND 21,337.50 Report Totals 21,337.50 We confiirm to the best of our lamdedge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing PoRdO j Phu _ 10/3112007 8:38:50 Page - 1 owe, see MINNESOTA CHEMICAL HEALTH WEEK PROCLAIMED NOVEMBER 12 - 18, 2007 WHEREAS, over half a million Americans will die this year from alcohol, tobacco and other drug-related causes; and WHEREAS, it costs every man, women and child in Minnesota more than $1,200 annually to cover the costs of unnecessary health care, extra law enforcement, auto accidents, crime and lost productivity resulting from substance abuse; and WHEREAS, every person in the State of Minnesota is affected by alcohol, tobacco and other drug abuse; and WHEREAS, prevention and treatment efforts have made major gains in reversing the trend toward more and more alcohol, tobacco and other drug use in our communities; and WHEREAS, alcohol, tobacco and other drug use are major factors in fires, drownings, rape and other crimes, school failure, child abuse, injury, disease, violence and lost productivity; and WHEREAS, fetal alcohol spectrum disorders are the leading cause of mental retardation in the United States, yet these disorders are 100 percent preventable; and WHEREAS, business, government, law enforcement, schools, religious institutions, service organizations, neighborhoods, youth, senior citizens, and other individuals are encouraged to demonstrate their commitment to help reduce and prevent alcohol, tobacco and other drug abuse by wearing and/or displaying the color red during Minnesota Chemical Health Week. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that November 12 - 18, 2007, be declared MINNEOSTA CHEMICAL HEALTH WEEK throughout the City of Edina; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Council Members of the City of Edina support the activities of Minnesota Chemical Health Week, The Great American Smokeout and the work of the Minnesota Prevention Resource Center and encourage the citizens of the City of Edina to participate in Minnesota Chemical Health Week activities and other alcohol and drug'abuse prevention efforts all year long. kyN0 Kly 9 City Clerk Mayor \� • ��'n�v nOP 4Tb'� � j 7. 0 1968 Proclamation America Recycles Day November 15, 2007 Whereas, citizens and visitors of Edina enjoy the beauty of our City and its parks and public spaces; and, Whereas, reduction through recycling and buying recycled products saves precious energy, conserves valuable natural resources, protects the environment, creates jobs, prevents littering by eliminating material from the litter stream and prolongs the useful life of many materials; and, Whereas, recycling and buying recycled products are becoming increasingly important in our efforts to ease the growing problems of solid waste management; and, Whereas, participating in the America Recycles Day is .one way citizens can help raise awareness about the need to reduce waste by reusing, recycling, and buying recycled products; and, Whereas, the theme of America Recycles Day is "Make an Effort to Make a Difference ". Now Therefore, Be It Resolved, I James B. Hovland, Mayor of the City of Edina, do hereby proclaim November 15, 2007, as: America Recycles Day and encourage all citizens to join in the nationwide effort to make more efficient use of natural resources by maximizing recycling, buying recycled products and preventing waste. In Witness Whereof, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal the City of Edina to be affixed this fifth day of November, 2007. James B..Hovland, Mayor MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL OCTOBER 16, 2007 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Housh approving the Council Consent Agenda with the exception of the Minutes of the September 25, 2007 Study Session, the minutes of the October 2, 2007 Work Session and Item V.B bid for New Well #20 Contract No. PW 074. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. FIRE BATTALION CHIEF TOM SCHMITZ RECOGNIZED - GRADUATION FROM EXECUTIVE FIRE OFFICER PROGRAM Chief Scheerer explained the Executive Fire Officer Program was a national training program that - accepted very few candidates annually. He said that Tom Schmitz had completed a rigorous four year course and has graduated from the Executive Fire Officer Training Program. The Council thanked Battalion Chief Schmitz for his perseverance and hard work and applauded his completion of the rigorous program and achievement of the designation Executive Fire Officer. DISTINGUISHED SERVICE AWARD - EDINA POLICE DEPARTMENT CHAPLAINS Chief Siitari explained the Edina Police Chaplains were established in 1997 and were celebrating their tenth anniversary of providing counseling and support to the Edina community with the Edina Police Department. The chaplains assist with notification of families when there has been a death or severe injury. They also minister to the public safety personnel. He stated he was presenting a Distinguished Service Award to the entire unit and introduced the chaplains: Rev. Tony Jones, Rev. Rich Phenow, and Rev. Kurt Kalland, noting that Rabbi Chaim Goldberger was not in attendance. Mr. Siitari explained that retired Lt. Ken Kane and Officer Beth Jordon were instrumental in organizing the Chaplains unit. The Council thanked the Chaplains and officers for their dedication in this important service to the community. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 2, 2007 APPROVED Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Housh approving as presented the minutes of the HRA Meeting of October 2, 2007 and the minutes of the Regular meeting of October 2, 2007. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2007 STUDY SESSION AND OCTOBER 2, 2007 WORK SESSION APPROVED Member Bennett requested the last sentence of paragraph three be changed to read, "Following their discussion the following steps were agreed to: ". Motion of Member Bennett seconded by Member Masica to approve the September 25, 2007 Study Session minutes as amended. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Following a brief discussion, Member Bennett made a motion approving the October 2, 2007, Study Session Minutes with the following amendment: paragraph three shall have the sentence, Page 1 Minutes/Edina City Council/October 16,200 "However, the Council may also hold a public hearing before making any decision," struck from the record. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARINGS ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Due notice having been given, public hearings were conducted and action taken as recorded on the following proposed special assessments. MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. M-07 Location: 50th and France Avenue Business District Analysis of Assessment for Maintenance Improvement No. M -07 showed a total maintenance cost of $159,865.32 against 339,561 assessable square feet at $0.4708 per square foot. One year assessment payable in 2008. No public written or oral comments were received. Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Masica closing the public hearing for Maintenance Improvement Assessment No. M -07, 50th and France Avenue Business District. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Housh made a motion seconded, by Member Swenson adopting Maintenance Improvement No. M-07 Final Assessment Roll for the 50th & France Business District. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. MAINTENANCE IMPROVEMENT NO. G-07 Location: Grandview Square Business District Analysis of Assessment for Maintenance Improvement No. G -07, showed a total maintenance cost of $20,927.68 against 461,701 assessable square feet at $0.0453 up from last year's rate at $0.0336 per square foot. One -year assessment payable in 2007. No public written or oral comments were received. Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Bennett closing the public hearing for Maintenance Improvement No. G-07 for Grandview Square Business District. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson made a motion approving Grandview Square Business District Maintenance Improvement Assessment G-07 Final Assessment Roll. Member Masica seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. AQUATIC WEEDS IMPROVEMENT - AQ-07 Location: Arrowhead Lake, Indianhead Lake and Minnehaha Creek Millpond Page 2 Minutes/Edina City Council/October 16, 2007 ARROWHEAD LAKE Analysis of special assessments for Aquatic Weeds Improvement No. AQ -07 for Arrowhead Lake showed a total of $14,578.09 to be assessed against 36 parcels at $404.95 per parcel. One year assessment, payable in 2008. A $3.00 administrative fee has been added to each home. INDIANHEAD LAKE Analysis of special assessments for Aquatic Weeds Improvement No. AQ -07 for Indianhead Lake showed a total of $13,568.35 to be assessed against 33 parcels at $411.16 per parcel. One year assessment, payable in 2008. A $3.00 administrative fee has been added to each home. MINNEHAHA CREEK MILL POND Analysis of special assessments for Aquatic Weeds Improvement No. AQ -07 for Minnehaha Creek Millpond a total of $7,077.25 less $900.00 City share of the cost, for a total of $6177.25 to be assessed against 63 parcels at $98.05 per parcel. One year assessment, payable in 2008. A $3.00 administrative fee has been added to each home. Public Comment David Brown, 6433 Margarets Lane, expressed his concerns about the water quality of Arrowhead Lake. He said he believed the lake Was in transition and requested assistance in saving the lake. Member Housh made a motion to close the public hearing seconded by Member Swenson for special assessments of Aquatic Weed Improvement No. AQ -07 for Arrowhead Lake, Indianhead Lake and Minnehaha Creek Mill Pond. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Swenson approving special assessment Aquatic Weed Improvement AQ -07 for Arrowhead Lake, Indianhead Lake and Minnehaha Creek Mill Pond Final Assessment Roll. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. WEED MOWING IMPROVEMENT SPECIAL ASSESSMENT NO. WD -07 Location: Various Properties within the City of Edina Analysis for special assessments for Weed Mowing Improvement No. WD -07 showed eleven parcels assessed as follows for Weed Mowing: 6309 France Ave. South $180.00 6509 Willow Wood Road $330.00 5801 Zenith Ave. South $180.00 6308 WilryanAve. $105.00 5921 France Ave. South $180.00 5125 William Ave. $105.00 5633 Woodcrest Drive $180.00 5013 Bedford Ave. $105.00 6905 Mark Terrace $180.00 5017 Indianola Ave. $134.90 5125 W. 49th Street $180.00 TOTAL $1,859.00 A $30.00 administrative fee was assessed for each property. No public written or oral comments were received. Member Bennett made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson to close the public hearing on Weed Mowing Improvement Special Assessment No. WD -07. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 3 Minutes/Edina City Council/October 16, 2007 Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson approving the Weed Mowing Improvement Special Assessment No. WD -07 Final Assessment Roll. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. TREE REMOVAL IMPROVEMENT - TR -07 Location: Various locations in the City of Edina Analysis for special assessments for Tree Removal Improvement No. TR -07 showed parcels assessed as follows for removal of diseased trees: 5510 Highwood Drive West $900.00 2 years 4708 Merilane $1,813.88 3 years 416 Jackson Avenue $1,087.75 3 years 4116 62nd Street West $882.00 2 years 4012 Wood End Drive $1,521.00 2 years 5818 Xerxes Avenue South $376.13 1 year 6736 Indian Way West $485.00 1 year 6201 Idylwood Lane $429.38 1 year A $30.00 administrative fee was assessed for each property. No public written or oral comments were received. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Masica to close the public hearing on Tree Removal Assessment TR -07. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Bennett approving Assessment No. TR -07 for various Tree Removal Improvement locations. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. FENCE REPAIR ASSESSMENT - NO. FR -07 Location: 6809 Creston Road The property owner at 6809 Creston Road was requested to install a fence around the property due to the nuisance caused by the home when they were attempting to move it off the site. After due notification and inspections the City fenced the property to abate the nuisance at a cost of $3,650.00 plus $300.00 in administrative costs. No written or oral comments were received. Member Housh made a motion seconded by Member Swenson to close the public hearing for Fence Repair Assessment No. FR -07. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Bennett approving Special Assessment No. FR -07 or Fence Repair at 6809 Creston Road for a three -year assessment. Page 4 Minutes/Edina City Council/October 16, 2007 Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson introduced Resolution No. 2007 -110 Levying Special Assessments for Various Public Improvements and Projects. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 112 ADOPTED CERTIFYING DELINQUENT UTILITY BILLS FOR COLLECTION IN 2008 Finance Director Wallin explained that MS 444.075 allowed cities to certify delinquent utility bills for collection with property taxes. He noted that over 700 customers with delinquent bills totaling over $359,000 were notified of the City's intent to certify their delinquent utility bills. Mr. Wallin said that the final certification would be reduced by those customers paying their delinquencies until November 21, 2007. No written or oral comments were received. Member Swenson made a motion to close the public hearing. Member Housh seconded the motion on Special Assessments. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Masica made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2007 -112 certifying delinquent utility accounts for collection with the 2008 property taxes. Member Bennett seconded the motion Roll call: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *FINAL GATEWAY PROTECT ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW (AUAR) HEARING DATE SET NOVEMBER 5, 2007 Motion made by Member Swenson setting November 5, 2007 as the hearing date for the Final Gateway Project Alternative Urban Areawide Review. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENT Kitty O'Dea, 4610 Bruce Avenue, requested the City Council review their public comment policy. Julie Banker, 4000 Lynn Avenue, asked for further assistance with problem water. She presented her findings to the Council. Mary Jo Aiken, 4548 France Avenue, presented a petition requesting sidewalk be constructed between 44th Street and 48th Street on the west side of France Avenue. Following discussion, Member Swenson made a motion to receive the petition and refer it to the Engineering Department for processing. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Tara Bizily, 4005 Lynn Avenue, presented results of water tests she had from water at her home. She urged the Council to provide assistance and to remedy the problem water as soon as possible. Page 5 Minutes/Edina City Council/October 16,200 Nan Schwappach, 4010 Lynn Avenue asked for assistance with the water for residents of Lynn Avenue. *BID AWARDED FOR PARK BUILDINGS KEYLESS ENTRY SYSTEM UPGRADE Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Housh awarding contract for the Park Building keyless. entry system upgrade to the recommended low bidder, Siemens Building Technologies, Inc. in the amount of $29,250.00. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. BID AWARDED FOR NEW WELL #20 CONTRACT NO. PW 074 Following discussion, motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Bennett noting the City Council approved location of the well at the south west corner of Bredesen Park and awarded the contract to the staff recommended low bidder, Keys Well Drilling Company for the amount of $297,890.00,. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *BID AWARDED FOR PURCHASE OF A DUMP BOX FOR ONE -TON TRUCK - PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Housh awarding contract for purchase of a truck box including hydraulics and snowplow for a one -ton truck, to the recommended low bidder, Aspen Equipment Co. (State of Minnesota Contract #437050) in the amount of $32,364.59. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *BID AWARDED FOR CONTRACT NO 07 -3PK COURTNEY FIELDS MAINTENANCE BUILDING - BRAEMAR PARK Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Housh awarding Courtney Fields Maintenance Building in Braemar Park, Contract No. 07 -3PK to the recommended low bidder, Prestige Builders of MN for the amount of $157,200.00. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -109 ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained in order to comply with State ' Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by resolution and approved by a majority of favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Swenson introduced Resolution 2007 -109, accepting various donations, and moved approval. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. FINAL REPORT FROM THE BIKE EDINA TASK FORCE - CONTINUED UNTIL NOVEMBER 5, 2007 Mr. Hughes noted the Bike Edina Task Force had requested their Final Report be continued until November 5, 2007. Member Roush made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson to continue the Bike Edina Task Force Report to November 5, 2007. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. STAFF RECOMMENDATION OF PRIVATE FUND- RAISING VENTURE WITH EDINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION Mr. Hughes explained the Council at its Tuesday, October 2, 2007, joint work session with the Park Board, directed staff to place this proposed fund- raising project on Page 6 Minutes/Edina City Council/October 16, 2007 the Council's agenda to decide on the process that staff and Park Board should follow. He said the proposal was to raise donated funds via the Edina Athletic Facilities Foundation, which was an authorized committee of the Edina Community Foundation, for the purpose of developing an artificial turf multi- purpose athletic field with lights for Pamela Park. Mr. Hughes noted the Edina Athletic Facilities Foundation was chaired by Park Board member George Klus and had established the following mission statement: The Edina Athletic Facilities Foundation supports the youth and adult recreation needs in the Edina Community. This Organization, with the support of the Edina Community Foundation, works to secure donations to fund new developments and improvements to Edina's public athletic facilities. Iii cooperation with the Edina Athletic Associations and Clubs, School District, City of Edina and the community, we strive to provide premier recreation, training, and game facilities for the Community. Mr. Hughes said the Edina Athletic Facilities Foundation viewed the proposed Pamela Park project as a high priority. The multi- purpose athletic field would be used for soccer, football, rugby, ultimate Frisbee and softball. He added that before asking for private donations, the committee would like assurance that it was feasible to develop at the proposed location and secondly if the concept has the approval of Park Board and City Council. Mr. Hughes said staff had hired Anderson/ Johnson and Associates to determine if this multi- purpose athletic field was feasible for the proposed location, to ensure that there were no wetland and floodplain issues that cannot be resolved; to determine the exact size and location of the proposed field; to determine the amount of additional parking needed for the site and its location; and to estimate total project costs. Mr. Hughes reported preliminary conclusions suggest that the project would be physically feasible for the site; noting the final analysis would take another two months to complete. He asked for direction for staff and Park Board as to how to handle the public process for this matter. Mr. Hughes put forward staff s recommendation to mail public input meeting notices ; and public hearing notices, to households that were within 1,000 feet of the park parcel where the field has been proposed. This would equate to just over 500 households. Following Park Board review, a recommendation would be sent to the Council for their consideration. Park Director Keprios added the Park Board and staff believed the project was important enough that if fund- raising attempts did not succeed the project should be included in the Park Department's Capital Improvement Program. The Council discussed the private fund- raising proposal. Issues discussed included transparency of costs of consultant to determine feasibility of the project, holding a public informational meeting and a public hearing at the Park Board before the Council would hold a hearing on the issue, and the notice area. Staff was directed to notify residents within 1,000 feet of all Pamela Park parcels, noting that when the 1000 feet split a street, both sides of the street be included in the notice. Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Housh authorize the Park Board to a public hearing on the proposed private fund - raising venture with the Edina Community Foundation to develop an artificial turn athletic field with lights at Pamela Park. The recommendation would also include a neighborhood public input meeting with staff and consultant prior to a Park Board Public Hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Page 7 Minutes/Edina City Council/October 16, 2007 *RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -111 ADOPTED AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF PUBLIC HEALTH EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS GRANT Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Housh adopting Resolution No. 2007 -111 authorizing the City of Edina to enter into an agreement with the Minnesota Department of Public Health Emergency Preparedness Pandemic Influenza and Cities Readiness Initiative. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Housh approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the check register dated October 3, 2007, and consisting of 32 pages: General Fund $167,420.23; Communications Fund $5,127.58; Working Capital Fund $64,741.95; Construction Fund $6,142.95; Art Center Fund $18,152.81; Golf Dome Fund $1,263.66; Aquatic Center Fund $2,085.31 Golf Course Fund $22,391.84; Ice Arena Fund $17,938.75; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $20,769.54; Liquor Fund $128,364.28; Utility Fund $74,019.54; Storm Sewer Fund $39,576.07; PSTF Fund $2,755.11; Total $570,749.62 and for approval of payment of claims dated October 10, 2007, and consisting of 31 pages: General Fund $527,571.92; Communications Fund $23,069.98; City Hall Debt Service $900.00, Working Capital Fund $162,546.81; Art Center Fund $6,473.27, Golf Dome Fund $209.96; Aquatic Center Fund $7,229.69; Golf Course Fund $23,403.57; Ice Arena Fund $38,805.81; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $2,489.16; Liquor Fund $193,921.09; Utility Fund $422,486.32; Storm Sewer Fund $1,437.04; Recycling Fund $125.00; PSTF Agency Fund $5,269.57, Total $1,415,939.19 for August 27, 2007 - September 25, 2007 Credit Card Transactions consisting of one page: Total $2,787.28. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. DISCUSSION OF PUBLIC COMMENT The Mayor and Council briefly discussed the public comment portion of their meetings. No consensus was achieved. It was agreed that further discussion would take place at a future meeting. There being no further business on the Council agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 9:35p.m. Respectfully submitted, Page 8 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk MINUTES OF THE JOINT WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL AND ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT COMMISSION HELD AT CITY HALL OCTOBER 16, 2007 5:00 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:00 P.M. in the Community Room of Edina City Hall. Answering rollcall were: Members Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Present from the Energy and Environment Commission were: Members- Iyer, Plunkett Latham, Nelson, O'Connell, Owens, Paterlini, Risser, and Chair Sierks. Staff present included: Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Wayne Houle, City Engineer; Laura Fulton, Communications Coordinator; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Mayor Hovland said the purpose of the special work session was to review the proposed work plan of the Energy and Environment Commission. He turned to Chair Sierks who had each member introduce themselves and give a bit of their background. Chair Sierks handed a draft workplan out for review. He noted the Commission has formed three subcommittees: 1) Recycling and Solid Waste Committee, 2) Education and Outreach Committee, and 3) Climate Change Committee. Chair Sierks said the Commission will be inviting persons who originally applied for appointment to the Commission to join one of the subcommittees to enable them to be active groups. It was discussed that the Commission and its subcommittees would follow the same process for notification of meetings and use the standard format for their agendas and minutes. The Commissions workplan was reviewed as follows: Recycling and Solid Waste Committee - Chaired by Member Plunket Latham • Draft an RFP for city recycling vendors; existing City contract expires 12- 31 -08; RFP could include single sort vs. dual stream, hazardous waste recycling, organic recycling and others; • Education and outreach regarding recycling and solid waste • Participation in updating 2008 Edina Comprehensive Plan Education and Outreach Committee - Chaired by Member Wenham • Student and Parent Initiative - coordinate with schools and parent organizations; research /survey to determine children/ parents approach and understanding of environmental issues; develop a week tip for students to take home. • Business Initiative - present survey to Edina Chamber Board of Directors for approval, distribute survey at regular Chamber events to gain input on local business approach and understanding of environmental issues; develop presentations, dialogs and tips to engage local businesses in more effective environmentally sensitive decision making Minutes/Edina City Council/Work Session October 16, 2007 • Residents Initiative - Non Student/Parent Residents - under development Climate Change Committee - Chaired by Member Paterlini • Energy Efficiency - work with utility companies to identify EE opportunities in community; work with city and school district to identify EE opportunities; U.S. Women's Open - opportunity for recycling, energy and outreach • Renewable Energy - develop solar PV demonstration project involving city and business potentially using Pentagon Park development; evaluate wind energy project with other cities of utilities; expand and refine city green building policies; evaluate other RE option s- solar thermal; geothermal; green tag • Reduce Carbon Footprint - follow 5 step plan to address carbon change (ICLEI); evaluate city purchasing policy; prioritize purchase of environmentally friendly products; evaluate opportunities to reduce carbon footprint of city fleet • Carbon tracking and Measure - International Council for Local Environmental Initiative (ICLEI) or similar software; with City staff, utilities to determine City's carbon footprint; determine emission baseline year and tracking system The Council discussed with the Commission the workplan as outlined by each committee. Many ideas were exchanged and information shared. The pros and cons of the City's participation in the International Council for Local Environmental Initiative (ICLEI) was discussed. The issue will be placed on a future Council agenda for consideration and action. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 6:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra Mangen, City Clerk To: Mayor & City Council From: Cary Teague Planning Director Date: November 5, 2007 Subject: Set Hearing Date for Amendments to Zoning Ordinance 850.21 Recommendation: REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item II.A. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ❑ . Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Set hearing date for the November 20, 2007, City Council meeting to consider an amendment to subsection 850.21 regarding an amendment to the City's Flood Insurance Rate Map. REPORURECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item II.A. From: Cary Teague Consent Planning Director Information Only ❑ Date: ° November 5, 2007 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Set Hearing Date for Amendments to Zoning Action ® Motion Ordinance 850.11 ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Set hearing date for the November 20, 2007, City Council meeting to consider an amendment to subsection 850.11 regarding building height in the R -1 Zoning District. Recommended Action: Adopt the attached resolution approving the Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for the Gateway Study area. Introduction/Background As you recall, the City has received a request for a significant mixed use development proposal in the Pentagon Park Area at 77th Street and Highway 100. The amount of development expected triggers the need for an environmental review. The City of Edina chose the Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) as the method of study. That study has now been completed. By adopting the Final AUAR, any redevelopment that is proposed within the study area would need to meet the mitigation measures outlined within the document. If the density of a development proposal exceeded the densities that were analyzed, the AUAR would need to be updated. State law requires that the AUAR be updated every five years until redevelopment within the study area is approved. Please note that adopting the AUAR does not authorize any redevelopment project, nor does it replace or overrule any of the normal Comprehensive Plan or Zoning Ordinance. required hearings, project review, or other city approvals. It simply is a vehicle for identifing and evaluating any and all potential project environmental impacts prior to an official development application. See the attached memo from WSB and Associates, and the final draft of the AUAR. REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item II.B Consent From: Cary Teague Planning Director Information Only Date: November 5, 2007 Mgr. Recommends To HRA ® To Council Subject: Final Alternative Urban Action ® Motion Areawide Review (AUAR) for the Gateway Study area. Resolution ❑ Ordinance Discussion Recommended Action: Adopt the attached resolution approving the Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for the Gateway Study area. Introduction/Background As you recall, the City has received a request for a significant mixed use development proposal in the Pentagon Park Area at 77th Street and Highway 100. The amount of development expected triggers the need for an environmental review. The City of Edina chose the Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) as the method of study. That study has now been completed. By adopting the Final AUAR, any redevelopment that is proposed within the study area would need to meet the mitigation measures outlined within the document. If the density of a development proposal exceeded the densities that were analyzed, the AUAR would need to be updated. State law requires that the AUAR be updated every five years until redevelopment within the study area is approved. Please note that adopting the AUAR does not authorize any redevelopment project, nor does it replace or overrule any of the normal Comprehensive Plan or Zoning Ordinance. required hearings, project review, or other city approvals. It simply is a vehicle for identifing and evaluating any and all potential project environmental impacts prior to an official development application. See the attached memo from WSB and Associates, and the final draft of the AUAR. RESOLUTION NO. 2007-121 ADOPTING THE FINAL ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW (AUAR) FOR THE GATEWAY STUDY AREA City of Edina WHEREAS, an AUAR has been completed for the project pursuant to Minnesota Rules 4410 and identifies and assesses the environmental impacts and mitigation measures associated with the Gateway Study Area; WHEREAS, the Gateway Study Area is located on approximately 135 acres generally between TH100, the Fred Richards Golf Course, France Avenue and Edina's border with Bloomington within the City of Edina in Hennepin County as shown in the AUAR; WHEREAS, four proposed redevelopment scenarios have been evaluated as part of the AUAR process; WHEREAS, one of the redevelopment scenarios was in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan; WHEREAS, the preparation of the Gateway Study Area AUAR included distribution for one 30 -day and one 10 -day comment period as required by Minnesota Rules 4410; WHEREAS, comments received on the AUAR have generated information adequate to determine mitigation measures associated with the potential redevelopment in this area; WHEREAS, the comments received are included in the public record for the AUAR; WHEREAS, redevelopment in the Gateway Study Area is expected to comply with all Edina and review agency standards as well as the mitigation measures outlined in the AUAR. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MN: The City of Edina adopts the Final Gateway Study Area Alternative Urban Areawide Review dated September 26, 2007. Passed and adopted this 5th day of November, 2007. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland; Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 5, 2007, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this _ day of 20_. City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET City Clerk FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 WSB & Associates Inc. Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and City Council, City of Edina From: Andrea Moffatt, WSB & Associates Date: October 29, 2007 Re: Final Gateway Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) WSB Project No. 1686 -04 The item on the City Council agenda for November 5, 2007 is to consider adoption of the Final AUAR for the Gateway Study Area. The Final AUAR evaluates potential redevelopment of the 135 acre area located between TH100, the Fred Richards Golf Course, France Avenue, and Edina's border with Bloomington. Four different redevelopment scenarios were evaluated for potential environmental impacts within the AUAR. The scenarios evaluate differing amounts of office, commercial, light- industrial, and residential land uses. As part of the AUAR development process, a Draft Gateway Study Area AUAR was submitted for a 30 -day public comment period, which ended on August 15, 2007. Two public meetings were also held during this time to inform the public of the process, to answer questions, and to obtain public input. Comments were received from various agencies and members of the public. Responses to the comments were prepared and the AUAR revised. The comments and revisions were reviewed with the City Council on September 18 and October 2, 2007 and included in the Final AUAR in the appendix. The Final AUAR and the responses to comments were then submitted for the required 10 -day comment period. This second, 10 -day comment period ended October 18, 2007. No objections to the Final AUAR were received by the City. Therefore, the City can move forward and consider adoption of the Final AUAR. While no objections were received during the 10 -day comment period, the City did receive comments from Bloomington, the Metropolitan Council, and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. These comments are included in the public record of the AUAR and a summary of the comments is provided below: G: (AUAR MEMO- 101907 -city. doc It October 29, 2007 Page 2 of 3 • City of Bloomington: Bloomington provided comments related to the MCES Interceptor, storm water management, transportation, and cumulative impacts. Bloomington requested additional language changes to the Final AUAR related to the mitigation measures associated with the MCES BN -499 sanitary sewer interceptor. Edina and Bloomington are continuing to work with the Metropolitan Council to address the sanitary sewer capacity issues that will affect the western portion of the study area. It is our opinion that the language within the AUAR is sufficient to address the interceptor issues with the Metropolitan Council and Bloomington and no additional changes are needed. Bloomington's storm water management comments were related to acknowledging both cities' desire to work with the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District to construct improvements to Pond SP-1 (the "border basin "). With respect to the transportation system, Bloomington requested clarification as to which transportation improvements were related to the redevelopment versus background traffic growth. The City anticipates addressing this issue outside of the AUAR when redevelopment projects are proposed. Additionally, the Edina AUAR took into account future development in Bloomington to best of the City's ability based on information provided by Bloomington at the time of the information request in early 2007 and within Bloomington's Comprehensive Plan. However, without density limitations within those areas of Bloomington, it was difficult to forecast this growth. Therefore, a general annual growth for background traffic was used plus known redevelop in Edina's AUAR. Regarding cumulative impacts, Bloomington has some projects that historically received zoning approval. It was the City's understanding from past meetings with Bloomington in early 2007 that these projects had historically received zoning approval (in 1996 and 2001) but the projects had not moved forward since that time. Edina's analysis of the cumulative impacts took into account available zoning information as well as projects that were known and had a strong likelihood of moving forward. The purpose of the Edina AUAR was not to evaluate the potential impacts of potential projects within Bloomington. The AUAR does state that Edina will work with Bloomington and potentially participate in a regional traffic study that will assist in anticipating future potential redevelopment within the TH100/I -494 area. It is our recommendation that additional changes to the AUAR to address these comments are either not needed or can be addressed through the implementation of the AUAR mitigation measures. • Metropolitan Council: Metropolitan Council offered some minor clarifications related to the operators of the transit routes in the area and that both bus shelters and bus stops should be made ADA compliant. Metropolitan Council also clarified that they need to review Comprehensive Plan amendments, which is the required process that the City follows. Finally, it was noted that additional coordination to address the MCES G: AUARUNEMO- 102907- city.doc October 29, 2007 Page 3 of 3 interceptor line will continue. It is our recommendation that no changes to the Final AUAR are needed. • Nine Mile Creek Watershed District: Nine Mile Creek Watershed District reiterated their comments that they previously sent regarding storm water management in the area. Redevelopment will need to meet the Nine Mile .Creek Watershed District requirements. It is our recommendation that no changes to the Final AUAR are needed. The item before the City Council on the November 5, 2007 meeting is to consider adopting the Final AUAR. By adopting the Final AUAR, any redevelopment that is proposed within the study area will need to meet the mitigation measures outlined in the document as well as be within the density analyzed in the AUAR. If the density is exceeded or mitigation measures are not met, the AUAR will need to be updated. Further, Minnesota Rules requires that the AUAR be updated every five years until redevelopment within the study area is approved. It should be noted that adopting the Final AUAR does not authorize any redevelopment nor does it indicate the City is selecting a specific development scenario. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at (763) 287 -7196. cc: Cary Teague, City of Edina Wayne Houle, City of Edina Jack Sullivan, City of Edina Daniel Green, Miller Dunwiddie GAAUARN EMO- 102907- city.doc - FINAL GATEWAY STUDY AREA ALTERNATIVE URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW _ EDINA, MN SEPTEMBER 269 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS '` List of Figures List of Appendices _Executive Summary .............................................................. ............................... ...........................Page 1 Final Mitigation Plan for Gateway Study Area Page 5 Gateway Study Area Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review ....................... ...........................Page 12 : 1. Project Title ....................................................:............... ............................... ...........................Page 12 2. Proposer .............................. ....Page 12 ........ 3. RGU ....Page 12 4. Reason for AUAR Preparation ..................................... ............................................................... Page 12 5. Project Location .....................................................:........ ............................... ...........................Page 12 6. Description ...................................................................... ............................... ...........................Page 12 7. Project Magnitude Data............. ........................... ............................... c ........ ...........................Page 19 8. Permits and Approvals Required .................................... ............................... ...........................Page 20 9. Land Use ......................................................................... ............................... ...........................Page 22 10. Cover Types .................................................................... ............................... ..........:................Page 23 11. Fish, Wildlife, and Ecologically Sensitive Resources ..... ............................... ..........................Page 25 12. Physical Impacts on Water Resources ............................ ............................... ...........................Page 26 13. Water Use ....................................................................... ............................... ...........................Page 27 14. Water - Related Land Use Management Districts ............ ............................... ...........................Page 36 15. Water Surface Use .......................................................... ............................... ...........................Page 36 16. Erosion and Sedimentation ............................................. ............................... ...........................Page 36 17. Water Quality: Surface Water Runoff ............................ ............................... ...........................Page 37 18. Water Quality: Wastewater ....... ............ ............................... ........................... ...........Page 43 19. Geologic Hazard and Soil Conditions ..... ............................... .............. ..........................Page 64 20. Solid Wastes, Hazardous Wastes, Storage Tanks .......... .......... ...................... ...........................Page 66 :. 21. Traffic .............................................................................. ............................... ..........................Page 68 ' 22. Vehicle - Related Air Emissions ...................................... ............................... ...........................Page 102 23. Stationary Air Emissions ................................................ ............................... ...........................Page 102 24. Dust, Odors, or Noise ............................. ........................ ............................... ...........................Page 102 25. Nearby Resources ........................................................... ............................... ...........................Page 108 26. Visual Impacts ................................................................ ............................... .............:.............Page 109 27. Plan Compatibility ............................................ ............................... .............. ...........................Page 109 28. Impact on Infrastructure and Public Services ................. ............................... ...........................Page 111 29. Cumulative Impacts ........................................................ ............................... ...........................Page 112 30. Other Potential Environmental Impacts .......................... ............................... ...........................Page 115 City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 LIST OF FIGURES (APPENDIX A) Figure 5 -1: General Location Map Figure 5 -2: USGS Location Map Figure 5 -3: Aerial Photo Location Figure 5 -4: Existing Land Use Map Figure 6 -1: Scenario 1 Figure 6 -2: Scenario 2 Figure 6 -3: Scenario 3 Figure 6 -4: Scenario 4 Figure 9 -1: Pollutant/Dump Locations Figure 10 -1: Existing Conditions Cover Types Figure 12 -1: Wetlands Map Figure 13 -1: Well Location and DWSMA Map Figure 13 -2: Water System Map Figure 16 -1: Soil Erodibility Figure 17 -1: Subwatershed Map Figure 18 -1: Sanitary Sewer Map Figure 19 -1: Hydrologic Soils Group Figure 19 -2: Soils Map Figure 21 -1: Key Intersections Figure 21 -2: Existing 2007 Vehicular Turning Movements Figure 21 -3: Existing 2007 Vehicular Turning Movements Figure 21 -4: Trip Distribution Figure 21 -5: Scenario 12014 Vehicular Turning Movements Figure 21 -6: Scenario 12014 Vehicular Turning Movements Figure 21 -7: Scenario 2 2014 Vehicular Turning Movements Figure 21 -8: Scenario 2 2014 Vehicular Turning Movements Figure 21 -9: Scenario 3 2014 Vehicular Turning Movements Figure 21 -10: Scenario 3 2014 Vehicular Turning Movements Figure 21 -11: Scenario 4 2014 Vehicular Turning Movements Figure 21 -12: Scenario 4 2014 Vehicular Turning Movements Figure 21 -13: Scenario 12030 Vehicular Turning Movements Figure 21 -14: Scenario 12030 Vehicular Turning Movements Figure 21 -15: Scenario 2 2030 Vehicular Turning Movements Figure 21 -16: Scenario 2 2030 Vehicular Turning Movements Figure 21 -17: Scenario 3 2030 Vehicular Turning Movements Figure 21 -18: Scenario 3 2030 Vehicular Turning Movements Figure 21 -19: Scenario 4 2030 Vehicular Turning Movements Figure 21 -20: Scenario 4 2030 Vehicular Turning Movements Figure 21 -21: Traffic Mitigation Plan Figure 21 -22: Existing Transit Service Figure 24 -1: Noise Receptor Locations Figure 29 -1: Adjacent Developments City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 kin LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A: Figures Appendix B: Department of Natural Resources Letter and State Historical Preservation Office Correspondence; Edina Preservation Planning Consultant Memo Appendix C: Responses to Comments and Comment Letters City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Note to reviewers: Comments on this Final Gateway Study Area Alternative Urban Areawide Review and Mitigation Plan should be.submitted to the City of Edina during the 10 -day comment period. This comment:period.ends on October 18, 2007. INTRODUCTIONBACKGROUND The City of Edina (Edina) has prepared the Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for the Gateway Study Area in conformance4ith, Minnesota Rules; 4410.3610. A Final Mitigation Plan for the Gateway Study Area is also included with this document. The Final Gateway Study Area AUAR.is being prepared as a result of a developer, Gateway Development, Edina LLC (herein referred to as the Developer) purchasing a series of parcels in two different locations within the Gateway Study Area with the intent to perform redevelopment. These parcels are referred to in this. document as Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quads sites and are shown in Figure 5 -3. In response to the Developer's request to redevelop these parcels, Edina decided to review the potential for greater redevelopment activity within the commercial and industrial area along West 77th Street adjacent to these recently acquired parcels. The Gateway Study Area (Study Area) is approximately 135 acres. The Study Area is bounded by Minnesota Trunk Highway 100 (TH 100) on the west; France Avenue on the east; 76th Street West and Fred Richards-Golf Course on the north; .arid Edina's border with Bloomington on the south. The area is shown on Figures 5 -1, 5 -2, and 5 -3. The Gateway Study Area currently contains a mixture of light industrial/warehouse, commercial,.office and residential uses. There is a total of 1,904,000 gross square feet (gsf) of these uses in the existing conditions. The surrounding land uses in the area include commercial and light industrial to the east, west, and south; Fred Richards Golf Course to the north and single family residential, and multi - family apartments to the north. Access to the Gateway, Study Area from TH 100 is available at the northwest boundary via an interchange at 77th Street West. Similarly, access from I -494 is available approximately a quarter mile to the southeast of the Gateway Study Area via an interchange at France Avenue. The environmental impacts of four redevelopment scenarios were evaluated as part oft his Final AUAR as indicated below. Scenario 1. — Comprehensive Plan (Figure 6 -1) Scenario 1 represents the land uses and densities allowed under the Edina Comprehensive Plan (1999). Under this scenario, a combination of .office, commercial, and light industrial; land uses with a small area of residential use would be utilized in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan, resulting in up to 1,561,000 gsf of office and commercial space, 1,296,000 gsf of combined commercial and light industrial redevelopment, and 3.1,000,,gsf of residential development for a City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page I of 115 total redevelopment potential of 2,888,000 gsf. This represents approximately 984,000 gsf more redevelopment than exists today within the Study Area in the existing conditions. Scenario 2 — Master Plan Scenario (Figure 6 -2) Scenario 2 represents incorporating a "master plan" scenario brought forth by the Developer proposing to redevelop the Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quads sites within the Gateway Study Area. The location of the Pentagon Towers and Quads properties proposed for redevelopment by the Developer are shown on Figure 5 -3. Within the Pentagon Towers site, the Developer is proposing to redevelop the site into 985,000 gsf of office space (6 -14 stories high), 50,000 gsf of retail space, and a 150 -room hotel totaling 80,000 gsf (seven stories high). This site currently contains 168,500 gsf of office space within six stories. All the existing buildings will be replaced with the redevelopment. Within the Pentagon Quads site, the Developer is proposing to redevelop the site into 30,000 gsf of retail space, 183,000 gsf of office space (four stories), and 820 housing units (two to five stories). This site currently contains 492,000 gsf of office space. All but two of the existing office buildings will be replaced by the redevelopment. The redevelopment for the remaining areas within the Gateway Study Area is the same as Scenario 1. For the purposes of this Final AUAR, the total redevelopment potential of the entire Study Area is analyzed, not just the Developer's properties. Therefore, potential redevelopment in the entire Study Area includes 3,252,000 gsf commercial, office, and light industrial, 914,000 gsf residential (with 856 residential units), and 80,000 gsf hotel for a total of 4,246,000 gsf of redevelopment. This scenario would require an amendment to the current Comprehensive Plan. This represents approximately 2,342,000 gsf more development than exists within the Study Area today in the existing conditions and 1,358,000 gsf more development than is anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan. Scenario 3 — Maximum Commercial Build Scenario (Figure 6 -3) Scenario 3 represents a maximum commercial build scenario where the majority of redevelopment would be in the form of new commercial, office and light industrial construction, totaling approximately 4,572,000 gsf of redevelopment. A small amount of new residential redevelopment would still remain, totaling approximately 31,000 gsf. The proposed redevelopment of the remaining parcels outside of the Pentagon Park and Quads area would remain consistent with Scenario 1. The total potential redevelopment for this scenario results in 4,603,000 gsf for the entire Study Area. This scenario would require an amendment to the current Comprehensive Plan. This represents approximately 2,699,000 gsf more development than exists today within the Study Area in the existing conditions and 1,715,000 gsf more development than is anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan. Scenario 4 — Maximum Residential Scenario (Figure 6 -4) Scenario 4 represents a maximum residential land use, which would convert the Pentagon Quads site to multi - family apartments and condominiums, while converting the Pentagon Towers site to a combination of commercial office and multi - family housing. This scenario would result in approximately 1,536 multi - family residential units and represent 1,581,000 gsf of residential City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 2 of 115 redevelopment. The remaining area could redevelop into 2,405,000 gsf of commercial, office, and industrial redevelopment. The total potential redevelopment for this scenario results in 3,986,000 gsf for the entire Study Area. Like Scenario 2, this scenario would require an amendment to the current Comprehensive Plan. This represents approximately 2,082,000 gsf more development than exists today within the Study Area in the existing conditions and 1,098,000 gsf more development than is anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan. Table 1 -1: Comparison of Redevelopment Scenarios with Existing Conditions SUMMARY OF MAJOR ISSUES Wastewater (Item 18) The western portion of the Gateway Study Area, mainly west of Parklawn Avenue, is serviced by a trunk sanitary sewer line that flows south into Bloomington along Computer Avenue and to Lift Station No. 10 (see Figure 18 -1). Once this line crosses the border into Bloomington, it becomes the Metropolitan Council's interceptor line referred to as MCES BN -499 Interceptor. The area east of Parklawn Avenue is serviced by a trunk sanitary sewer that flows north to Edina's Lift Station No. 6, and is eventually discharged into the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) Richfield -491 interceptor sewer. The parcels immediately adjacent to France Avenue discharge sewage directly into Edina Lift Station No. 22, where flow is eventually discharged into the MCES Richfield -491 interceptor sewer. For the eastern portion of the Gateway Study Area, mainly from Parklawn Avenue east to France Avenue, the existing sanitary sewer infrastructure,is adequately sized to support any additional flows associated with all scenarios, both within and downstream of the Study Area.. For the western portion of the Gateway Study Area, improvements to the sanitary sewer system will be needed. For all four scenarios, it is necessary to upgrade the pump sizes at the Metropolitan Council's Lift Station No. 10 when a net increase in redevelopment of 300,000 gsf occurs. It will also be necessary to upgrade the 9 -inch line within Edina when a net increase in redevelopment of 648,000 gsf occurs. More detailed sanitary sewer analysis for the Gateway Study Area can be found in Item 18 of this report. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 3 of 115 Existing Scenario 1: Scenario 2: Scenario 3: Scenario 4: Conditions Comprehensive Master Maximum Maximum Plan Plan Commercial Residential Office 1,546,000 1,862,000 3,261,000 1,094,000 Commercial / 15,000 174,000 15,000 15,000 Retail/Hotel 1,873,000 Office & Light 1,296,000 1,296,000 1,296,000 1,296,000 Industrial Mix Residential 31,000 31,000 914,000 31,000 1,581,000 TOTAL: 1,904,000 2,888,000 4,246,000 1 4;603,000 3,986,000 SUMMARY OF MAJOR ISSUES Wastewater (Item 18) The western portion of the Gateway Study Area, mainly west of Parklawn Avenue, is serviced by a trunk sanitary sewer line that flows south into Bloomington along Computer Avenue and to Lift Station No. 10 (see Figure 18 -1). Once this line crosses the border into Bloomington, it becomes the Metropolitan Council's interceptor line referred to as MCES BN -499 Interceptor. The area east of Parklawn Avenue is serviced by a trunk sanitary sewer that flows north to Edina's Lift Station No. 6, and is eventually discharged into the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) Richfield -491 interceptor sewer. The parcels immediately adjacent to France Avenue discharge sewage directly into Edina Lift Station No. 22, where flow is eventually discharged into the MCES Richfield -491 interceptor sewer. For the eastern portion of the Gateway Study Area, mainly from Parklawn Avenue east to France Avenue, the existing sanitary sewer infrastructure,is adequately sized to support any additional flows associated with all scenarios, both within and downstream of the Study Area.. For the western portion of the Gateway Study Area, improvements to the sanitary sewer system will be needed. For all four scenarios, it is necessary to upgrade the pump sizes at the Metropolitan Council's Lift Station No. 10 when a net increase in redevelopment of 300,000 gsf occurs. It will also be necessary to upgrade the 9 -inch line within Edina when a net increase in redevelopment of 648,000 gsf occurs. More detailed sanitary sewer analysis for the Gateway Study Area can be found in Item 18 of this report. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 3 of 115 Water Supply (Item 13) The portion of the Gateway Study Area west of Parklawn Avenue receives water service from Bloomington. The area east of Parklawn Avenue, receives water service from Edina. Figure 13 -2 shows the areas serviced by Bloomington and Edina. There are two public wells located immediately north of the Gateway Study Area within the Fred Richards Golf Course as shown on Figure 13 -1. For the Bloomington- serviced portion of the Gateway Study Area, there is adequate capacity within Bloomington's system to accommodate each of the development scenarios. For the Edina- serviced portion of the Gateway Study Area, full redevelopment increases the peak day water demand above the City's existing firm capacity, based on the 2002 Water Distribution System Analysis. Edina has performed some upgrades to its existing wells and pumping systems that have likely resulted in increased water system firm capacity that may be adequate to support the increase in peak day water demand. Storm Water Management (Item 17) A general storm water management analysis for the four redevelopment scenarios has been completed and is included in Item 17. Any redevelopment within the Gateway Study Area will be required to develop a site - specific storm water management plan that provides volume control, rate control, and treatment of storm water in conformance with the Edina Water Resource Management Plan, the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) NPDES Construction permit. Edina is a designated MS4 City; therefore any redevelopment will need to show it is not degrading downstream water resources. Redevelopment is also required to meet the policies outlined in Edina's Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan and the Final AUAR Mitigation Plan. Transportation (Item 21) The existing transportation infrastructure will require various upgrades, mainly at intersections, to allow for the increase in traffic volumes anticipated as a result of the Gateway Study Area redevelopment. The extent of the necessary improvements range from adding turn lanes at intersections and interchange reconstruction. The majority of the recommended transportation system upgrades would occur at the TH 100 and 77th Street West interchange, as well as along France Avenue, between Interstate 494 (I -494) and Parklawn Avenue. Additional roadway improvements within the Gateway Study Area are also recommended to accommodate increase in traffic volumes that can be anticipated within the Gateway Study Area. Item 21 provides more detail regarding the needed roadway improvements. Fish and Wildlife (Item 11) The majority of the Gateway Study Area is urban and developed in nature. Therefore, the Study Area offers very limited habitat for wildlife. The Fred Richards Golf Course to the north of the Study Area and the pond along the south border of the Study Area has some City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 4 of 115 aquatic habitat including shallow marshes and small wooded areas. Given that the Gateway Study Area is already fully developed, no net impact,on wildlife can be reasonably expected. FINAL MITIGATION PLAN FOR GATEWAY STUDY AREA Pursuant to Minnesota Rules, a mitigation plan has been developed as part of this Final AUAR. This mitigation plan applies to each of the proposed redevelopment scenarios unless otherwise noted. A. Land Use Compatibility and Permitting Al. The proposed change in land use of Scenarios 2, 3, and 4 at the Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quads site will require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. A2. Any redevelopment will be required to meet Edina zoning requirements. A3. Any project proposers will be required to obtain any necessary approvals and permits. A4. If components of a proposed project exceed Edina City Code requirements, variances from the City's requirement will need to be applied for by the developer. The City will review these variance requests and make a determination as to the approval or denial of the project as part of the review process. A project proposer could also seek to amend the City Code. This request would also be reviewed by the City. B. Geologic Hazards, Erosion Control, and Hazardous Material B 1. Prior to demolition an asbestos survey shall be completed by a project proposer. At the time of demolition, any necessary asbestos abatement will need to be completed by the project proposer in compliance with MPCA requirements. B2. The management, containment, and clean up of any spills that may occur within the Study Area during construction will be addressed by the permit holders of the MPCA NPDES /SDS Storm Water Construction Permit and its accompanying Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan preparation. B3. If a neighborhood convenience store and gas station is proposed, the project proposer will be required to adhere to State regulations for containment of underground petroleum tanks and an annual license would be needed. B4. The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), including temporary and permanent seeding and staging plans, will be required to be submitted by each project proposer and reviewed by Edina. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 5 of 115 B5. The project proposer will need to develop an erosion control plan and submit this plan to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for review and approval. B6. During construction, the project proposer and their contractor will implement Best Management Practices as needed to prevent erosion and sedimentation of downstream water resources. B7. Edina will develop a SWPPP and obtain an NPDES permit for the construction of any public infrastructure improvements (sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water main) that disturb one acre of land or more. B8. Edina will conduct erosion control inspections during construction. B9. Project proposers will make environmental hazard investigation documents, such as Phase I Environmental Assessments, available to Edina. B-10. Project proposers will be required to remediate any contaminated soils encountered in conformance with MPCA regulations. B 11. Project proposers will be required to remove and properly dispose of trash and debris located within a project site, including all demolition materials that may include asbestos. B 12. Municipal waste hauler companies will make residential and commercial recycling programs available to the Study Area. General municipal waste will be removed by these waste hauler companies. B 13. The NPDES Phase II Construction Site permit requires a site specific Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ( SWPPP) to be completed for the construction by the project proposer. This SWPPP is required to include pollution prevention management measures for solid waste and hazardous material spills that occur during construction. B 14. Mitigation includes conformance with the Edina spill response plan. Spills will be reported to the fire chief and/or applicable City Staff. The fire chief and/or applicable City Staff will in turn notify any other appropriate officials depending on the nature of the spill. B15. Project proposers will be required to develop a temporary dewatering plan for construction activities, review this plan with Edina and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for approval, and conform to the dewatering requirements of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and NPDES Construction permit. B16. If a redevelopment project involves permanent dewatering for underground facilities, a detailed dewatering plan is required to be developed by the project proposer. This plan would include anticipated dewatering amounts, direction of discharge, analysis of impact on adjacent ponds and downstream receiving waters, and impact on the organic material within City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 6 of 115 the: Study Area for the potential for subsidence. The; plan will need to be submitted to Edina, Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, and DNR for review and/or approval. C. Fish, Wildlife, Wetlands, and Ecologically Sensitive Resources C1. Buildings to be removed as part of redevelopment will be field checked by the project proposer to determine if there are nesting Peregrine Falcons on the structure. If falcons are noted'nesting on�the, structure, the site cannot be disturbed until the juvenile birds have fledged' and left the nest. C2. The project proposer will be required to delineate wetlands within their project boundaries, if any, and review these, delineations with the Nine Mile Creek" Watershed District and Edina to determine jurisdictional status. The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District is the Local. Government:Unit -for the Wetland Conservation Act and will review and verify any wetland delineations. C3. If wetland impact is proposed, the project proposer will be required to minimize impact to the maximum extent possible and mitigate for any unavoidable impacts in conformance with the Wetland Conservation Act. D. Municipal Water Use and Service D 1. Edina will work with Bloomington to determine the needs for water system capacity improvements, water main upgrades, -and future service to the Gateway Study Area. D2. In conjunction with their Comprehensive Plan update, Edina will complete an update to the 2002 Water Distribution System Analysis for the entire city to determine what current and future water system improvements may be necessary to continue to serve the City's water needs and maintain a water system.firm capacity above the maximum daily water use within the City. D3. As redevelopment occurs, Edina will complete an analysis of the water mains within the. Gateway Study Area to determine if performing water main replacement is necessary and if it should occur in conjunction with other potential infrastructure improvements, such as sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and transportation improvements. D4. Any abandoned wells found within the .Gateway Study Area will be sealed in accordance with Minnesota Department of Health guidelines. This will be the responsibility of the project proposer. D5. In accordance with Edina's Wellhead Protection Plan, continued protection of the 'existing Drinking Water Supply Management Areas located within the Gateway Study Area as shown in Figure 13 -1 will be required for redevelopment projects. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 7 of 115 D6. There is potential for areas that redevelop within the Bloomington service area to request to be served by Edina. If this occurs, additional analysis and water main improvements will need to be completed by Edina in coordination with Bloomington. D7. Individual redevelopment may require the installation of service pumps to serve multi- story buildings and to provide adequate fire protection. The size and type of pumps will vary based on individual building characteristics, should meet the existing local building and fire protection codes, and will be the responsibility of the developer. E. Water Quality and Quantity E1. Redevelopment projects will be required to be designed to meet the policies of the most current Edina Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. E2. Redevelopment projects will be required to be designed to meet the policies of the most current Nine Mile Creek Watershed District requirements. E3. Redevelopment within the Gateway Study Area will be required to limit peak runoff rates to at least existing conditions and reduce the runoff volume so as not to negatively impact the existing storm sewer system. E4. Redevelopment needs to reduce the amount of impervious surface within the project limits or develop a site specific storm water management plan that shows that the project will not impact downstream pollutant or volume loading. E5. If warranted by Edina's Nondegradation Plan (completion anticipated in January 2008), project proposers will need to include storm water management strategies that reduce the total suspended solid loadings, total phosphorous pollutant loadings, and storm water runoff volumes from the Gateway Study Area. E6. Any redevelopment project that disturbs more than one acre of land is required to develop a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan and obtain an NPDES permit from the MPCA. E7. Edina and project proposer(s) will investigate the expansion of the existing ponding areas within the Fred Richards Golf Course to provide additional storage and treatment as outlined in Edina's Water Resource Management Plan. E8. The Cities of Edina and Bloomington will petition the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District to expand the South Pond (SP-1) pond to provide additional storm water treatment for the area. E9. As Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) studies are completed for Nine Mile Creek, the results of these studies will be reviewed by Edina. Redevelopment in the Study Area will be required to meet any mitigation and pollutant load reductions that may be outlined within the TMDL studies. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 8 of 115 E10. The project proposer will review and determine which Low Impact Development (LID) practices are feasible to be used for each parcel. Edina will review the LID techniques and encourage their use to the greatest extent possible. El 1. A maintenance plan is required to be reviewed and approved by the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for privately constructed and maintained storm water management facilities. F. Wastewater Mitigation Plan Fl. Any redevelopment activities that may increase the total sanitary sewer flows within Service Area A beyond threshold limits for peak capacity will require upgraded facilities within the Gateway Study Area (Computer Avenue sanitary sewer) and Bloomington (MCES Bloomington Lift Station No. 10) to accommodate increased flows. F2. Edina, Bloomington, and Metropolitan Council Environmental Services will continue discussions and analysis regarding proposed capacity upgrades to Bloomington Lift Station No. 10 and the MCES BN -499 Interceptor along West 84th Street in Bloomington. F3. Edina will complete its update to their Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan. F4. Edina will upgrade Lift Station No. 22. F5. In conjunction with redevelopment activities, Edina will determine the condition of the existing sanitary sewer pipe within the Gateway Study Area to determine if repairs or replacement is necessary based on in -place pipe condition and infiltration potential. G. Traffic and Transportation G1. Scenarios 1 and 4 The following mitigation strategies are needed for Scenario 1 and 4 to accommodate both 2014 and 2030 traffic projections: Intersection: France Avenue / West 76th Street Improvement: Extend one southbound thru lane on France Avenue to create a total of four thru lanes Intersection: France Avenue / West 78th Street Improvement: Eastbound dual right turn lanes on West 78th Street Southbound lanes approaching the I -494 ramps restriped to provide exclusive lanes to both westbound I -494 and eastbound I -494. The right lane will drop at the westbound I -494 ramp providing an exclusive ramp lane. The second lane will also be an exclusive lane leading to I -494 eastbound, reducing the weaving and stacking City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 9 of 115 of vehicles that occur today. The County has expressed interest in participation. Intersection: Edina Industrial Boulevard / West 78th Street Improvement: Eastbound dual left turn lanes on West 78th Street Intersection: Edina Industrial Boulevard / Metro Boulevard Improvement: Add southbound right turn lane on Metro Boulevard, restriping the existing two southbound lanes to accommodate an exclusive left turn lane, and a thru/left lane, providing dual left turn lanes. Add 300 foot eastbound left turn lane on Edina Industrial Boulevard Intersection: Northbound TH 100 / West 77th Street Improvement: Add 150 foot northbound right turn lane on Frontage Road Westbound dual right turn lanes on West 77`h Street G2. Scenario 2 Scenario 2 will require all the improvements listed above in addition to the following: Intersection: Improvement: Intersection: Improvement Intersection: Improvement: Intersection: Improvement: G3. Scenario 3 Minnesota Drive / France Avenue Dual westbound left turn lanes on Minnesota Drive Eastbound dual left turn lanes on Minnesota Drive Northbound TH 100 / West 77th Street Add 150 foot eastbound right turn lane on West 77th Street Computer Avenue / West 77th Street Northbound dual left turn lanes on Computer Avenue Minnesota Drive / West 771h Street / Johnson Avenue Southbound dual left turn lanes on West 77th Street Scenario 3 will require all the above improvements listed under Scenarios 1, 2, and 4 in addition to the following: Intersection: Minnesota Drive / France Avenue Improvement: Eastbound dual right turn lanes on Minnesota Drive Intersection: France Avenue / West 78th Street Improvement: Westbound dual right turn lanes on West 78th Street Interchange: TH 100 / West 77th Street City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 10 of 115 Improvement: Six -lane section from Metro Boulevard to .Computer Avenue Dual left turn turns at both TH 100 Ramps (Hence an eight -lane bridge) G4. General The mitigation measures;discussion above (Gl — 03) are needed to address full build out of the site and surrounding area. Specific mitigation measures required.for proposed development plans will be established through traffic and transportation studies required for each development proposal. These proposals will need to document compliance within the AUAR and mitigation. plan. G5. Transit/Non- Motorized Transportation As redevelopment occurs in the Gateway Study Area, consideration of site- specific improvements needs to be included as developments are proposed. These would include upgrading the existing transit facilities, including bus shelters, to become' ADA compliant and improving the sidewalk and/or path connections in and around each redevelopment. - H. Odor, Noise, and Dust H1. During construction activities, the project proposer and contractor shall observe all dust control Best Management. Practices for fugitive dust. H2. Edina will limit construction activities and any other activities that produce noise audible outside the perimeter of a property to between 7:00AM to 9:OOPM Monday through Friday and between.8 :00AM and 7:OOPM on Saturday, Sunday, and holidays. H3. Noise mitigation will be necessary if any residential units. are constructed near Receptor 2, located in the southwest quadrant of TH 1100/West 77h Street. Any residential buildings should be constructed using noise abatement methods. Noise abatement requirements to conform to state standards can be found in Minn. Rules 7030.0050, subp. 3. I. Archaeological, historical, or architectural resources, I1, Prior to. redevelopment of the Pentagon Towers and Quads sites that would require razing of the, existing structures, an evaluation and documentation of the historical and architectural significance of the. sites will be needed by the project proposer. This information will need to be submitted to Edina. J. Cumulative Impacts J1. Edina will work with Bloomington and potentially participate in a regional traffic study that will assist in anticipating future potential redevelopment within the TH 100/I -494 area and plan for infrastructure improvements. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 11 of 115 . Edina will also coordinate with other entities to address cumulative impacts. These items have been addressed in other areas of the AUAR and include mitigation plan items D1, D6, E8, F1, and F2. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 12 of 115 GATEWAY STUDY AREA FINAL ALTER_ NATIVE URBAN AREAWIDE REVIEW 1. PROJECT TITLE Gateway Study Area Alternative Urban Areawide Review (Final AUAR) 2. PROPOSER Environmental Quality Board (EQB) guidance indicates no response is necessary ` 3. RGU City of Edina Mr. Cary Teague Planning Director 4801 West 50`h Street Edina, MN 55424 E -mail: cteague a,ci.edina.mn.us 4. REASON FOR EAW PREPARATION EQB guidance indicates no response is necessary 5. PROJECT LOCATION County: Hennepin City /Township: Edina T28N R24W S 1/4 SECTION 31 County map showing the Gateway Study Area: Figure 5-1: Location Map �M U.S. Geological Surveyap: Figure 5 -2: USGS Location Map Map clearly depicting the boundaries ,of the AUAR and any subdistricts used in the AUAR analysis. Figure 5 -3: Aerial Location Map 6. DESCRIPTION a. Provide an AUAR summary of 50 words or less to be published in the EQB Monitor. The City of Edina.has prepared a Final AUAR for the Gateway Study Area located within 135 acres in southeastern Edina. The AUAR analyzes four scenarios for redevelopment in an area currently developed located between TH 100,•Minnesota Drive, France Avenue and 76' Street. b. Give a.description of the following elements for each major development scenario: - anticipated types and (intensity (density) of residential and commercial/warehouse/light industrial development throughout the AUAR area; City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 13 of 115 - infrastructure planned to serve development (roads, sewers, water, stormwater system, etc.) - information about the anticipated staging of various developments, to the extent known, and of the infrastructure, and how the infrastructure staging will influence the development schedule. The Final Gateway Study Area AUAR is being prepared as a result of a developer, Gateway Development, Edina LLC (herein referred to as the "Developer ") purchasing a series of parcels in two different locations within the Gateway Study Area with the intent to perform redevelopment. These parcels are referred to in this document as Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quads sites and are shown in Figure 5 -3. In response to the Developer's request to redevelop these parcels, Edina decided to review the potential for greater redevelopment activity within the commercial and industrial area along West 77th Street adjacent to these recently acquired parcels. A. Description of Study Area The Gateway Study Area is approximately 135 acres and is bounded by Trunk Highway 100 (TH 100) on the west; France Avenue on the east; 76th Street West and Fred Richards Golf Course on the north; and Edina's border with Bloomington on the south. The area is shown on Figures 5 -1, 5 -2, and 5 -3. The existing cover types are urban development, with minimal green space in the form of maintained lawns along roadway boulevards and parking lot edges. The majority of parcels are occupied by office and light industrial/warehousing business applications. Some wetlands and drainage basins exist within the Fred Richards Golf Course to the north and there is a pond along Edina's border with Bloomington to the south. The existing cover types are described in Item 10. The Gateway Study Area currently contains a mixture of light industrial/warehouse, commercial, and office properties. There is a total of 1,904,000 gross square feet (gsf) of light industrial, commercial, office space, with a small area of multi - family residential use. A summary of the existing conditions uses is shown in Table 6 -3. The existing surrounding land use is shown on Figure 5 -4. Access to the Gateway Study Area from TH 100 is available at the northwest boundary via an interchange at 77th Street West. Similarly, access from Interstate 494 (I494) is available approximately a quarter mile to the southeast of the Gateway Study Area via an interchange at France Avenue. B. Description of Redevelopment Scenarios This Final AUAR analyzes four redevelopment scenarios. As required by Minnesota Rules 4410.3 610, Scenario 1 analyzes redevelopment as permitted under the Edina Comprehensive Plan (Comprehensive Plan) dated 1999. Scenario 2 analyzes redevelopment as proposed by the Developer within its acquired properties and the remaining two scenarios look at maximum density options for commercial or residential redevelopment. The land uses analyzed in the AUAR included the following as shown on Figure 6 -1, 6 -2, 6 -3, and 6 -4: City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 14 of 115 Table 6 -1. Zoning District Uses POD -1: Office buildings, clinics Planned Office District -1 POD -2: Office buildings, clinics Planned Office District -2 PID: Planned Industrial District Office buildings, light industrial/warehouses, and manufacturing uses. PCD -2: Planned Commercial District -2 Commercial and retail uses. Includes office uses. PCD -3: Commercial and retail uses. Includes office uses. Planned Commercial District -3 (Generally allows more square footage than PCD -2) Senior citizen residential units in groups of four or more PSR -4: such as condos, townhomes, or apartments specifically Planned Senior Residence -4 for senior citizen use. Shops, restaurants and other services primarily intended for the use and convenience of residents are allowed. MDD -5: Residential units (minimum of 10), offices, financial Mixed Development District -5 institutions, and hotels. Scenario 1— Comprehensive Plan (Figure 6 -1) Scenario 1 represents the land uses and densities allowed under the Edina Comprehensive Plan (1999). Under this scenario, a combination of office, commercial, and light industrial land uses with a small area of residential use would be utilized in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan, resulting in up to 1,561,000 gsf of office and commercial space, 1,296,000 gsf of combined commercial and light industrial redevelopment, and 31,000 gsf of residential redevelopment for a total redevelopment potential of 2,888,000 gsf. This represents approximately 984,000 gsf more redevelopment than exists today within the Study Area in the existing conditions. Scenario 2 — Master Plan Scenario (Figure 6 -2) Scenario 2 represents incorporating a "master plan" scenario brought forth by the Developer proposing to redevelop the Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quads sites within the Gateway Study Area. The location of the Pentagon Towers and Quads properties proposed for redevelopment by the Developer are shown on Figure 5 -3. Within the Pentagon Towers site, the Developer is proposing to redevelop the site into 985,000 gsf of office space (6 -14 stories high), 50,000 gsf of retail space, and a 150 room hotel totaling 80,000 gsf (seven stories high). This site currently contains 168,500 gsf of office space within six stories. All the existing buildings will be replaced with the redevelopment. Within the City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 15 of 115 Pentagon Quads site, the Developer is proposing to redevelop the site into 30,000 gsf of retail space, 183,000 gsf of office space (four stories), and 820 housing units (two to five stories). This site currently contains 492,000 gsf of office space. All but two of the existing office buildings will be replaced by the redevelopment. The redevelopment for the remaining areas within the Gateway Study Area is the same as Scenario 1. For the purposes of this Final AUAR, the total redevelopment potential of the entire Study Area is analyzed, not just the Developer's properties. Therefore, potential redevelopment in the entire Study Area includes 3,252,000 gsf commercial, office, and light industrial, 914,000 gsf residential (with 856 residential units), and 80,000 gsf hotel for a total of 4,246,000 gsf of redevelopment. This scenario would require an amendment to the current Comprehensive Plan. This represents approximately 2,342,000 gsf more development than exists within the Study Area today in the existing conditions and 1,358,000 gsf more development than is anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan. Scenario 3 — Maximum Commercial Build Scenario (Figure 6 -3) Scenario 3 represents a maximum commercial build scenario where the majority of redevelopment would be in the form of new commercial, office and light industrial construction, totaling approximately 4,572,000 gsf of redevelopment. A small amount of new residential redevelopment would still remain, totaling approximately 31,000 gsf. The proposed redevelopment of the remaining parcels outside of the Pentagon Park and Quads area would remain consistent with Scenario 1. The total potential redevelopment for this scenario results in 4,603,000 gsf for the entire Study Area. This scenario would require an amendment to the current Comprehensive Plan. This represents approximately 2,699,000 gsf more development than exists today within the Study Area in the existing conditions and 1,715,000 gsf more development than is anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan. Scenario 4 — Maximum Residential Scenario (Figure 6 -4) Scenario 4 represents a maximum residential land use, which would convert the Pentagon Quads site to multi - family apartments and condominiums, while converting the Pentagon Towers site to a combination of commercial office and multi - family housing. This scenario would result in approximately 1,536 multi - family residential units and represent 1,581,000 gsf of residential redevelopment. The remaining area could redevelop into 2,405,000 gsf of commercial, office, and industrial redevelopment. The total potential redevelopment for this scenario results in 3,986,000 gsf for the entire Study Area. Like Scenario 2, this scenario would require an amendment to the current Comprehensive Plan. This represents approximately 2,082,000 gsf more development than exists today within the Study Area in the existing conditions and 1,098,000 gsf more development than is anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 16 of 115 Table 6 -2. Summary of Redevelopment Scenarios* * Calculations do not take into account existing or proposed wetlands, storm ponds, roads, right -of -way, or- utility easements in the Gateway Study Area. a Acreage includes mixed use redevelopment with commercial, retail, and office space applications. b Acreage includes mixed use redevelopment with office space applications. Table 6 -3: Com arison of Redevelopment Scenarios with Existing Conditions Existing Scenario 1: Office Space, Scenario 3: Scenario 4: Conditions Comprehensive Master Maximum Retail & . Housing & o Plan Commercial Warehousing, Office 1,546,000 •� 3,261,000 Office Space Commercial / Commercial Residential Hotel a Retail/Hotel 1,873,000 & Light g (Mixed Use) (Mixed Use) Office & Light Industrial Mix 1,296,000 1,296,000 Industrial 1,296,000 Residential 31,000 31,000 914,000 31,000 1,581,000 TOTAL: 1,904,000 2,888,000 4,246,000 1 4,603,000 1 3,986,000 g Fes, o Gam, o fz, o f� •b •o .`r > 0 8 s°'. o 0 8 L o 0 8 o 8 0 0 5 F A Q C7 rn ° Q C7.rn ° Q C7 rn ° G7 rn ° <x 0 1 122.68 70.95 1.546 49.59 1.296 2.14 0.015 36 - - - 2 122.68 31.84 1.862 49.59 1.296 41.25a 0.094 856 0.914 150 0.080 3 122.68 70.95 3.261 49.59 1.296 2.14 0.015 36 - - - 4 122.68 31.84 1.094 49.59 1.296 41.25 0.015 1536 1.581 - I - * Calculations do not take into account existing or proposed wetlands, storm ponds, roads, right -of -way, or- utility easements in the Gateway Study Area. a Acreage includes mixed use redevelopment with commercial, retail, and office space applications. b Acreage includes mixed use redevelopment with office space applications. Table 6 -3: Com arison of Redevelopment Scenarios with Existing Conditions B. Description ofB. Description of Surrounding The Gateway Study Area is located in southeastern Edina and is bordered by Bloomington to the south. Based on historical aerial photos, the area was utilized for cultivated agriculture purposes through the early 1960's. At that time, the construction of I -494 to the south and TH 100 to the west ushered in suburban growth, resulting in the rapid commercial, office, and industrial development of the area. By the mid 1970's the entire Gateway Study Area and its surroundings had developed into some form of commercial, office, or light industrial land use. To the north of the Gateway Study Area are single family and multi - family residential uses, as well as the Fred Richards Golf Course. Lake Edina is within one - quarter mile of the northwest corner of the Gateway Study Area. To the east, south, and west are mixed -use commercial and City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 17 of 115 Existing Scenario 1: Scenario 2: Scenario 3: Scenario 4: Conditions Comprehensive Master Maximum Maximum Plan Plan Commercial Residential Office 1,546,000 1,862,000 3,261,000 1,094,000 Commercial / 15,000 174,000 15,000 15,000 Retail/Hotel 1,873,000 Office & Light Industrial Mix 1,296,000 1,296,000 1,296,000 1,296,000 Residential 31,000 31,000 914,000 31,000 1,581,000 TOTAL: 1,904,000 2,888,000 4,246,000 1 4,603,000 1 3,986,000 B. Description ofB. Description of Surrounding The Gateway Study Area is located in southeastern Edina and is bordered by Bloomington to the south. Based on historical aerial photos, the area was utilized for cultivated agriculture purposes through the early 1960's. At that time, the construction of I -494 to the south and TH 100 to the west ushered in suburban growth, resulting in the rapid commercial, office, and industrial development of the area. By the mid 1970's the entire Gateway Study Area and its surroundings had developed into some form of commercial, office, or light industrial land use. To the north of the Gateway Study Area are single family and multi - family residential uses, as well as the Fred Richards Golf Course. Lake Edina is within one - quarter mile of the northwest corner of the Gateway Study Area. To the east, south, and west are mixed -use commercial and City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 17 of 115 light industrial parcels. Nine Mile Creek is located just west of TH 100. Further details of the types of existing land use can be seen in the Edina Land ,Use Plan as shown on Figure 5 -4. C. Anticipated Infrastructure Improvements To accommodate redevelopment activities, varying levels of infrastructure improvements, such as wastewater, storm water, water main, and transportation infrastructure, will be necessary. These improvements are summarized below: Wastewater Figure 18 -1 shows the existing layout of sanitary sewer within and adjacent to the Gateway Study Area. The western portion of the Gateway Study Area, mainly west of Parklawn Avenue, is serviced by a trunk sanitary sewer line that flows south into Bloomington along Computer Avenue and to Lift Station No. 10. Once this line crosses the border into Bloomington, it becomes the Metropolitan Council's interceptor line referred to as MCES BN -499 Interceptor.. The area east of Parklawn Avenue is serviced by a trunk sanitary sewer that flows north to Edina Lift Station No. 6, and is eventually discharged into the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) Richfield -491 interceptor sewer. The parcels immediately adjacent to France Avenue discharge sewage directly into Edina Lift Station No. 22, where flow is eventually discharged into the MCES Richfield -491 interceptor sewer. For the eastern portion of the Gateway Study Area, mainly from Parklawn Avenue east to France Avenue, the existing sanitary sewer infrastructure is adequately sized to support any additional flows associated with all redevelopment scenarios, both within and downstream of the Study Area. For the western portion of the Gateway Study Area, improvements to the sanitary sewer system will be needed. For all four scenarios, it is necessary to upgrade the pump sizes at the Metropolitan Council's Lift Station No. 10 when a net increase in redevelopment of 300,000 gsf occurs. It will also be necessary to upgrade the 9 -inch line within Edina when a net increase in redevelopment of 648,000 gsf occurs. More detailed sanitary sewer analysis for the Gateway Study Area can be found in Item 18 of this report. Water Supply The portion of the Gateway Study Area west of Parklawn Avenue receives water service from Bloomington. The area'east of Parklawn Avenue receives water service from Edina. Figure 13 -2 shows the areas serviced by both cities. There are two public wells located immediately north of the Gateway Study Area within the Fred Richards Golf Course as shown on Figure 13 -1. For the Bloomington- serviced portion of the Gateway Study Area, there is adequate capacity within Bloomington's system to accommodate each of the redevelopment scenarios. For the Edina - serviced portion of the Gateway Study Area, full redevelopment increases the peak day water demand above the City's existing firm capacity, based on the 2002 Water Distribution System Analysis. Edina has performed some upgrades to its existing wells and pumping City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 18 of 115 systems that have likely resulted in increased water system firm capacity that may be adequate to support the increase in peak day water demand. Edina has expressed some interest in looping its water main system along West 77`h Street to TH 100, and bringing the portions of the Gateway Study Area currently receiving water service from Bloomington into Edina's water system. This potential improvement would further require that an updated comprehensive water system analysis be performed, to ensure that Edina can handle the increase in water demand. Item 13 contains the water system analysis in more detail. Storm Water Management A general storm water management analysis for the four redevelopment scenarios has been completed and is included in Item 17. Any redevelopment within the Gateway Study Area will be required to develop a site - specific storm water management plan that provides volume control, rate control, and treatment of storm water in conformance with Edina's Water Resource Management Plan, the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) NPDES Construction permit. Edina is a designated MS4 City; therefore any redevelopment will need to show it is not degrading downstream water resources. Redevelopment is also required to meet the policies outlined in Edina's Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan and the Final AUAR Mitigation Plan. Transportation The existing transportation infrastructure will require various upgrades, mainly at intersections, to allow for the increase in traffic volumes anticipated as a result of the Gateway Study Area redevelopment. The extent of the necessary improvements range from adding turn lanes at intersections to interchange reconstruction. The majority of the recommended transportation system upgrades would occur at the TH 100 and 77th Street West interchange, as well as along France Avenue, between I -494 and Parklawn Avenue. Additional roadway improvements within the Gateway Study Area are also recommended to accommodate increase in traffic volumes that can be anticipated within the Gateway Study Area. Item 21 provides more detail regarding the needed roadway improvements. D. Development Phasing For the Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quad parcels that are currently proposed for redevelopment by the Developer, construction is anticipated to begin in 2008 and last for a minimum of five years into 2013 and possibly beyond, depending on commercial office space and residential housing demand. The remaining portions of the Gateway Study Area are not known by Edina to have any redevelopment planned, and therefore, the redevelopment phasing for these parcels is unknown. Sanitary sewer improvements are needed for any projects that exceed a net 300,000 gsf of redevelopment within the western portion of the Study Area that is served by the Metropolitan Council Lift Station No. 10 in Bloomington. This trigger, along with market factors, will dictate the phasing for the redevelopment. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 19 of 115 7. PROJECT MAGNITUDE DATA Total project acreage: 135 acres Number of residential units: attached See tables attached See tables maximum per building NA Commercial, industrial or institutional building area (gross floor space): total square feet See tables Table 1 -1 summarizes the proposed acreages and gsf for each land use for each scenario. The housing and residential land uses proposed in Scenarios 2 and 4 are anticipated to be in the form of senior apartments and townhomes. In all instances where residential land use is proposed, it is expected that the use will be in the form of mixed use development with commercial and office space utilizing the ground floor of most residential buildings. In the existing conditions, the buildings within the Gateway Study Area are mainly one and two story buildings. There are three and four -story buildings interspersed in the area with six -story buildings located on the eastern and western borders of the Study Area. The Pentagon Towers site currently contains a six -story building and the Pentagon Quads site contains two and three - story buildings. Building heights as a result of each redevelopment scenario may range from four stories for residential buildings up to 14 stories for office building. In accordance with Edina zoning policies, appropriate setbacks and screening will need to be provided. If a redevelopment proposal exceeds Edina's requirements, a variance would need to be obtained by the project proposer or the project proposer could seek to have the City Code revised. For each zoning district, the following building heights are allowed: Table 7 -1: Allowed Building Height by Zonine District Zoning District Allowed Building Height Mixed Development District (MDD -5) Building height determined by allowed building setback Planned Senior Residence (PSR -4) Building height determined by allowed building setback Planned Office Development POD -1 Four stories or 50 feet, whichever is less Planned Office Development (POD -2) Building height determined by allowed building setback Planned Commercial Development PCD-2) Four stories or 50 feet, whichever is less Planned Commercial Development (PCD -3) Height is determined by setback; a minimum 50 foot setback is required Planned Industrial Development (PID) Four stories or 50 feet, whichever is less City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 20 of 115 Project Magnitude Mitigation Plan • If components of a proposed project exceed Edina City Code requirements, variances from the City's requirement will need to be applied for by the developer. The City will review these variance requests and make a determination as to the approval or denial of the project as part of the review process. A project proposer could also seek to amend the City Code. This request would also be reviewed by the City. 8. PERMITS AND APPROVALS. List all known local, state and federal permits, approvals and financial assistance for the project. Include modifications of any existing permits, governmental review of plans, and all direct and indirect forms of public financial assistance including bond guarantees, Tax Increment Financing and infrastructure. Table 8 -1. List of Government Annrovals. Permits. and Financial Assistance Federal Permit/Approval US Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Permit or determination of no jurisdiction State Permit/Approval MPCA NPDES /SDS General Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity MPCA NPDES /SDS Stormwater Permit for if needed MPCA -operation, Sanitary Sewer Extension Permit Application to Voluntary Inspection MPCA and Compliance Program if hazardous materials remediation is needed Department of Natural Resources Temporary dewatering for construction Permanent dewatering permit for Department of Natural Resources dewatering of underground parking facilities, if needed Water main and sanitary sewer Department of Health replacement or upsizing; well capping and closures Minnesota Department of Work within Right of Way; if needed Transportation Minnesota Department of Drainage permit, if needed Transportation Minnesota Department of Plat approval, if needed Transportation Regional PermitlApproval Metropolitan Council Comprehensive Plan amendment, if Scenarios 2, 3, or 4 are proposed City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 21 of 115 Metropolitan Council Sewer extension approval Nine Mile Creek Watershed District WCA Approval, if needed Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Storm Water Management Plan Approval Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Dewatering plan review County PermidApproval Hennepin County Approval of France Avenue Improvements, if needed Hennepin County Plat Approval Local PermitlApproval City of Edina AUAR and Mitigation Plan adoption City of Edina Redevelopment plan review. City of Edina Preliminary plat approval City of Edina Final plat approval City of Edina Building & demolition permits City of Edina PUD Review and Approval, if needed City of Edina Rezoning, Conditional Use Permit, and Variance, if needed City of Edina Redevelopment Agreement City of Edina Sanitary Sewer Connection Permit City of Edina Municipal Water Connection Permit City of Edina Stormwater Management Plan Approval and Dewatering Plan review City of Bloomington Municipal Water Connection Permit Permits and Approvals Mitigation Plan • Any project proposer will be required to obtain any necessary approvals and permits. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 22 of 115 9. LAND USE. Describe current and recent past land use and development on the site and on adjacent lands. Discuss project compatibility with adjacent and nearby land uses. Indicate whether any potential conflicts involve environmental matters. Identify any potential environmental hazards due to past site uses, such as soil contamination or abandoned storage tanks, or proximity to nearby hazardous liquid or gas pipelines. Existing Conditions The Gateway Study Area is located in southeastern Edina. Based on historical aerial photos, the area has historically been a combination of wetland and cultivated agricultural areas through the early 1960's. At that time, the construction of I -494 to the south, and TH 100 to the west ushered in suburban growth, resulting in the rapid commercial, office, and industrial development of the area. By the mid 1970's the entire Gateway Study Area had developed into some form of commercial or industrial land use. To the north of the Gateway Study Area are single family and multi - family residential uses, as well as the Fred Richards Golf Course. Lake Edina is within one - quarter mile of the northwest corner of the Gateway Study Area. To the east, south, and west of the Gateway Study Area are mixed -use commercial, office, and industrial parcels. The historic aerial photos of the Gateway Study Area were reviewed (and are available upon request from Edina). These photos show the entire Gateway Study Area historically consisted of wetlands, with intermittent agricultural and/or farmstead land uses. These wetlands were significantly reduced through agriculture and drainage and eventually filled as development occurred in the 1960's. Information from the MPCA and FirstSearch was obtained related to potential environmental hazards due to past land uses. Information from the MPCA indicated the following waste and spill sites are either completely or partially within the Gateway Study Area (see Figure 9 -1): • MPCA ID #3484 — 7625 Parklawn Avenue — Type Unknown, Cleanup Complete • MPCA ID #6324 — 7800 Commercial Avenue — Type Unknown, cleanup Complete • MPCA ID #216832 — 4930 West 77h Street — Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) • MPCA ID #222439 — 7711 Normandale Boulevard — LUST • MPCA ID #223671 — 7851 Normandale Boulevard — LUST • MPCA ID #213556 — 4451 West 76th Street — LUST • MPCA ID #225305 — 7711 Normandale Boulevard — LUST • MPCA ID #213566 — Pentagon Office Park - LUST Information from FirstSearch (available upon request) indicated that there were small quantity generators of hazardous material and underground storage tanks within the Study Area. Some City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 23 of 115 Leaking Underground Storage Tanks were also noted; however, these spills sites have been closed. The Seagate site located south of the Study Area has had a number of spills in the past, but information indicates that these spills have been contained and closed. Additional information about these sites is available upon request from Edina. Impact of Develonment Scenarios 1 through 4 The four scenarios presented in this study reflect land uses that are common in this area of Edina. The existing land use consists of office space and light industrial, which are the primary land uses proposed in Scenario 1 and Scenario 3. The introduction of high- density housing in the form of condominiums or apartments would compliment the existing apartments and condominium apartments immediately to the north. Also, the addition of retail space and hotel would compliment the existing hotels and retail areas immediately adjacent to the east, west, and south of the Gateway Study Area. In general, the land uses in the Gateway Study Area are compatible with each other and the surrounding land uses. Land Use Mitigation Plan • Project proposers will make environmental hazard investigation documents, such as Phase I Environmental Assessments, available to Edina. • Project proposers will be required to remediate any contaminated soils encountered in conformance with MPCA regulations. • Project proposers will be required to remove and properly dispose of trash and debris located within a project site, including all demolition materials that may include asbestos. 10. COVER TYPES. Provide a cover type map and overlay map showing anticipated development. Existing Conditions The topography for the Gateway Study Area can be described as generally flat. Figure 10 -1 shows the existing cover types based on aerial photos and land use characteristics, with the acreages summarized in Table 10 -1. Based on this information and field review, the Gateway Study Area is fully developed into office, commercial, and light industrial land uses. Roads, sidewalks, and parking lots are included in this area along with lawn areas and boulevard or parking lot planter trees. There is a pond that is used for storm water retention purposes in the southeastern portion of the Gateway Study Area. This pond has been designated as the South Pond (SP-1) as noted in Edina's Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan. This ponding area is interconnected with Edina's storm water system. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 24 of 115 Table 10 -1: Existin .Cover Typ es Cover Type Acreage Type 1 -8 wetland 0.00* Ponds (SP_l) 3.20 Lakes 0.00. Woodlands 0.00 Grasslands /croplands 0.00 Boulevards, Lawns, & Other Pervious Surfaces 21.33 Roadways, Buildings, and Other Impervious Surfaces 110.47 TOTAL: 135.00 * No wetlands have been delineated in the Gateway Study Area. It is possible some exist along the edges of the pond or the southerly edge of the Fred Richards Golf Course as shown on Figure 10 -1. Impacts of Development Scenarios 1 through 4 Each of the four redevelopment scenarios would maintain the fully - developed, urban land use that currently exists. Any developer will be responsible for meeting all current Edina zoning requirements for building and structure setbacks. Storm water treatment in the form of ponding, bioretention, or other best management practices may be utilized as part of redevelopment to create additional green space within the urban environment. The Developer of the Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quads sites may use "green roofs" to create additional rainwater treatment and open space. The proposed land use types for each scenario are shown in Figure 6 -1 through Figure 6 -4. The existing storm water basin (SP_1) along the south edge of the Gateway Study Area will be preserved and maintained as part of any redevelopment activity. This pond has been evaluated in Edina's Water Resource Management Plan. While minor impact to the pond is anticipated with any of the redevelopment scenarios, the pond will be protected in conformance with Edina's Water Resource Management Plan. Cover Types Mitigation Plan • Any redevelopment will be required to meet Edina zoning requirements. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 25 of 115 11. FISH, WILDLIFE, AND ECOLOGICALLY SENSITIVE RESOURCES a. Identify fish and wildlife resources and habitats on or near the site and describe how they would be affected by the project. Describe any measures to be taken to minimize or avoid impacts. Existing Conditions The existing fish, wildlife, and ecologically sensitive resources have been analyzed based on previous studies, historical aerial photos, and a field review. The habitat available for wildlife is a function of the vegetation present. The majority of the Gateway Study Area is urban and developed in nature. Therefore, it offers very limited habitat for wildlife. The Fred Richards Golf Course to the north of the Gateway Study Area, and the pond along the south border, provide some open areas for wildlife. However, wildlife present is that which has adapted to urban environments and are common in the area. Impacts of Development Scenarios 1 through 4 The existing urban nature of the area and that of the proposed redevelopment of the Gateway Study Area is anticipated to consist of similar land uses and land covers. Therefore, no impact on the existing wildlife habit is to be expected. b. Are any state (endangered or threatened) species, rare plant communities or other sensitive ecological resources such as native prairie habitat, colonial waterbird nesting colonies or regionally rare plant communities on or near the site? N Yes ❑ No If yes, describe the resource and how it would be affected by the project. Indicate if a site survey of the resources has been conducted and describe the results. If the DNR Natural Heritage and Nongame Research program has been contacted give the correspondence reference number: ERDB 20070643. Describe measures to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. Existing Conditions The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Natural Heritage Database was consulted to determine if rare or endangered species are present in the area. The information from the DNR is contained in Appendix B. Based on this information, there are four known occurrences of three rare species that were noted outside of the Study Area. These occurrences include two threatened species ( Blanding's Turtle [two sightings] and Peregrine Falcon) and one species of special concern (Common Moorhen). Information from the DNR can be found in Appendix B. Impacts of Development Scenarios 1 through 4 Due to the existing urbanized land cover, the area does not currently provide suitable habitat for Blanding's Turtles or Common Moorhens. Blanding's turtles prefer shallow water with aquatic vegetation and sandy uplands for nesting. The Common Moorhen is a waterbird that prefers cattail/bulrush marshes with abundant vegetation. The limited City of Edina' Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 26 of 115 availability of wetlands and the developed nature of the existing conditions are not conducive to provide prime habitat for these species. Peregrine Falcons prefer nesting on cliff ledges along rivers or lakes. The birds will also nest on buildings or tall platforms. The falcon noted near the Study Area was located nesting on a building. No reports of falcons within the study have been noted. Fish, Wildlife, and Ecologically Sensitive Resources Mitigation Plan • Buildings to be removed as part of redevelopment will be field checked by the project proposer to determine if there are nesting Peregrine Falcons on the structure. If falcons are noted nesting on the structure, the site cannot be disturbed until the juvenile birds have fledged and left the nest. 12. PHYSICAL IMPACTS ON WATER RESOURCES. Will the project involve the physical or hydrologic alteration (dredging, filling, stream diversion, outfall structure, diking, and impoundment) of any surface waters such as a lake, pond, wetland, stream or drainage ditch? ® Yes ❑ No If yes, identify water resource affected. Describe alternatives considered and proposed mitigation measures to minimize impacts. Give the DNR Protected Waters Inventory.(PWI) number(s) if the water resources affected are on the PWI. Existing Conditions The Fred Richards Golf Course north of the Gateway Study Area contains a number of water bodies that act as water hazards within the golf course. Additionally, South Pond (SP_1), as noted in Edina's Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan, is located between the border of Edina and Bloomington in the southern portion of the Study Area. These areas are also shown on the National Wetland Inventory as shown on Figure 12 -1. While there are no DNR Public Waters /Wetlands within the Study Area, there are a few outside of the area as shown on Figure 12 -1. Lake Edina is located north of the Gateway Study Area and Nine Mile Creek is located west of TH 100. Storm water from the Study Area is eventually directed to Nine Mile Creek. Additional information about the storm water management of the Study Area is included in Item 17. Impacts of Development Scenarios 1 through 4 While wetlands have not been delineated within the Gateway Study Area, there are very few water bodies in the area. Impacts to water bodies or ponding areas are anticipated to be minimized, due to the lack of wetlands in the Gateway Study, Area. The South Pond (SP_1) and the water features within the Fred Richards Golf Course are the ponding areas that may be subject to impact. This impact could include excavating or enlarging these ponding areas to provide additional storm water treatment for the area. These ponds currently provide storage and/or treatment in the existing conditions. To further provide water quality protection for downstream resources such as Nine Mile Creek, enlargement of these features will likely be proposed. By enlarging these ponding areas, the existing function of the ponds will be enhanced and additional protection to downstream resources will be provided. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 27 of 115 Physical Impacts on Water Resources Mitigation Plan • The Cities of Edina and Bloomington will petition the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District to expand the SP_1 pond to provide additional storm water treatment for the area. (See Item 17 for additional information). • The project proposer will be required to delineate wetlands within their project boundaries, if any, and review these delineations with the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and Edina to determine jurisdictional status. The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District is the Local Government Unit for the Wetland Conservation Act and will review and verify any wetland delineations. • If wetland impact is proposed, the project proposer will be required to minimize impact to the maximum extent possible and mitigate for any unavoidable impacts in conformance with the Wetland Conservation Act. 13. WATER USE. Will the project involve installation or abandonment of any water wells, connection to or changes in any public water supply or appropriation of any ground or surface water (including dewatering)? ® Yes ❑ No If yes, as applicable, give location and purpose of any new wells; public supply affected, changes to be made, and water quantities to be used; the source, duration, quantity and purpose of any appropriations; and unique well numbers and DNR appropriation permit numbers, if known. Identify any existing and new wells on the site map. If there are no wells known on site, explain methodology used to determine. Existing Conditions The portion of the Gateway Study Area west of Parklawn Avenue receives water service from Bloomington. The area east of Parklawn Avenue, receives water service from Edina. Figure 13- 2 shows the location and sizes of the existing water mains throughout the Gateway Study Area, and identifies the areas serviced by both cities. Currently, only one private well exists within the Gateway Study Area boundaries. It is unknown whether this well is active or abandoned, or if the water used' is for irrigation or potable water purposes. There are two public wells located immediately north of the Gateway Study Area within the Fred Richards Golf Course. These are Edina Well No. 10 and No. 11. The wells on the County Well Index are shown on Figure 13 -1. A Drinking Water Supply Management Area (DWSMA) for the two Edina wells has been established as a part of the City's current Wellhead Protection Program and is shown in Figure 13 -1. There are several DWSMA's within Edina, but only two encompass portions of the Gateway Study Area. Redevelopment within DWSMA boundaries are subject to review for City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 28 of 115 conformance with the Wellhead Protection Program so that any development does not result in increased potential for groundwater contamination. The geology of Edina's existing wells is consistent with other communities in the Twin Cities Metro Area. The Paleozoic sedimentary rocks around the Twin Cities Metro area have three primary aquifers (in descending order): the Prairie du Chien - Jordan, the Franconian- Ironton- Galesville, and the Mt. Simon - Hinckley. Each of these is separated by a confining layer that essentially separates the aquifers. A summary of the characteristics of each aquifer is as follows: Prairie du Chien - Jordan Aquifer: The Prairie du Chien — Jordan aquifer is the best producing aquifer in the Metro area. Prairie du Chien — Jordan wells are optimal because they generally produce the greatest amount of water per foot of aquifer drawdown. Thirteen of Edina's 15 existing operational wells are located in the Jordan aquifer, including Well No. 11 immediately north of the Gateway Study Area. Franconia - Ironton - Galesville Aquifer: Due to its slow rate of recharge, the Franconia — Ironton — Galesville (FIG) aquifer is not commonly used in the Metro area. Water does not move through the aquifer very efficiently, causing pumping and drawdown problems. This can cause unanticipated well interference problems when adding new wells in the FIG, with the new wells frequently failing to meet expectations and old wells decreasing in productivity. This does not preclude any FIG wells, it just means that expectations must be kept modest and possible risks understood. Mt. Simon - Hinckley Aquifer: The deepest of the three aquifers is the Mt. Simon - Hinckley. There are no geologic factors that would limit further use by Edina. However, Minnesota Statute 103G.271 Subd. 4a prohibits the issuance of permits to appropriate water from this aquifer in the Metro area unless there are no feasible alternative to this source. Two of Edina's 15 existing operational wells are located in the Mt. Simon — Hinckley aquifer, including Well No. 10 immediately north of the Gateway Study Area. Existing and future demands for all of Edina have been reviewed in Edina's 2002 Water Distribution System Analysis, and Bloomington's 2000 Comprehensive Plan update. City of Edina Existing Water System Capacity Edina's well capacities range from 450 gallons per minute (GPM) to 2,000 GPM. The current system firm capacity, which includes the improvements proposed in the 2002 Water Distribution System Analysis, is 15,285 GPM (22.01 million gallons per day (MGD)), which is the system capacity minus the largest pump as if it were out of service. Existing total system capacity, which includes Edina's largest pump operating at capacity, will be assumed to be 17,285 GPM (24.89 MGD). Well firm capacity should meet or exceed maximum day demands. Historical water usage measurements for Edina, last taken in 2001, has indicated a maximum day demand of approximately 15,278 GPM (22.00 MGD), which is approximately equal to Edina's firm City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 29 of 115 capacity of 15,285 GPM (22.01 MGD). The City is ,able to handle increased water capacity demands by utilizing water within its five storage reservoirs. City of Bloomington Existing Water System Capacity Bloomington obtains water from both groundwater wells and through surface water that is purchased from the City of Minneapolis. Bloomington has a current firm, capacity of 30,555 GPD (44 MGD). Due to the cycling of pumps being utilized at the City's water plant, where one pump is always out of service, the City has an existing total system capacity equal to the firm capacity of 30,555 GPD (44 MGD). Historical water usage for Bloomington indicates a maximum day demand of approximately 27,500 GPD (39.6 MGD), which is approximately 90% of the firm and total system capacity. Gateway Study Area Analysis For the Gateway Study Area, a basic water system analysis utilizing average design values was performed to determine current water system demands. A design value of 95 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) with 3 people /unit for residential units (285 gallons per unit per day) and 800 gallons for every 10,000 gsf of building area was used. A peaking factor of 3.0 has been developed based on historical maximum day and average day water use ratios as shown in Edina's 2002 Water Distribution System Analysis and Bloomington's 2000 Comprehensive Plan Update. The existing Gateway Study Area water system demands are shown below in Table 13 -1. Table 13 -1. Existing Gateway Study Area Water Usage and Maximum Day Water Usage City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 30 of 115 Gross Avg. Day Peak Day Service Development Square Number Water Water City Type Footage of Units Demand Demand (MGD) (MGD) c Residential 31,000 36 0.010 0.031 a� . E Commercial / Office / 796,072 - 0.064 0.191 m Industrial TOTAL 827,072 36 .0.074 0.222 Residential - - - - �v Commercial / W Office / 1,076,928 - 0.086 0.258 Industrial TOTAL 1,076,928 - 0.086 0.258 City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 30 of 115 The existing water main within the Gateway Study Area consists of 8 -inch and 12 -inch cast iron and ductile iron pipe. The cast iron water main as generally more than 30 years old, and is in relatively good condition. The ductile iron water main is less than 15 years old, and is in good condition. There are a series of private water mains that service individual buildings within the Gateway Study Area, mainly to the Seagate Technologies property, which is south of West 77th Street and east of Computer Avenue; the Pentagon Towers property, located south of West 77th Street and west of Computer Avenue; and the Pentagon Quads property, located north of West 77th Street and west of Parklawn Avenue. Since water mains serving these properties are private, neither Edina nor Bloomington has records regarding the age or condition of these water lines. The water pressures within the Edina portion of the Study Area range from 80 -100 pounds per square inch (psi), while the pressures within the Bloomington portion of the Study Area range from 67 -70 psi. For a basis of comparison, The American Water Works Association recommends that water pressures should not drop below 35 psi for potable water systems. The fire flows at fire hydrants within the Gateway Study Area were measured between 790 GPM and 3,500 GPM. For a basis of comparison, fire flows should not drop below 500 GPM. The existing water main is adequately sized to meet fire flow standards. In addition, the existing buildings have additional fire suppression measures that have been installed, including automatic sprinkler systems and pumps to increase the water pressure within individual buildings. Impacts of Development Scenarios 1 through 4 For the purposes of this Final AUAR, it is assumed that the service areas as shown in Figure 13- 2 will remain the same, and any water main improvements, if necessary, would occur within the same location as the existing water main (i.e., no new water main alignments will be created). There is potential for areas that redevelop within the Bloomington service area to request to be served by Edina. If this occurs, additional analysis and watermain improvements will be needed. Impacts of Development Scenario 1 Redevelopment within all of the Gateway Study Area will be connected to municipal water service in this scenario. The majority of redevelopment under Scenario 1 would consist of office and warehousing uses, with some existing residential uses remaining in- place. Historical water usage calculations used the same assumptions as the existing conditions, where a design value of 95 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) with 3 people /unit for residential units (285 gallons per unit per day) and 800 gallons for every 10,000 gsf of building area, with a peaking factor of 3.0. Future water demand for the Gateway Study Area under Scenario 1 is shown below in Table 13 -2. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 31 of 115 Table 13 -2. Future Water Demand for Scenario 1, For the Bloomington- serviced portion of the Gateway Study Area, full redevelopment under Scenario 1 would result in an increase in the peak day water demand of 0.226 MGD, bringing the total peak day water use within Bloomington to 39.826 MGD, which is still lower that the City's firm and total water capacity of 44 MGD. For the Edina - serviced portion of the Gateway Study Area, full redevelopment under Scenario 1 would result in an increase in the peak day water demand of 0.011 MGD, bringing the total peak day water use within Edina to 22.011 MGD. This value exceeds Edina's current firm capacity of 22.01 MGD, but is still below Edina's total capacity of 24.89 MGD. Impacts of Development Scenario 2 The redevelopment under Scenario 2 is modified from Scenario 1 to include less office and commercial space and more mixed -use and residential land uses. The same water usage design values that were used for Scenario 1 were utilized to determine the water demands for redevelopment under Scenario 2. Table 13 -3 shows the projected future water demands anticipated for Scenario 2. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 32 of 115 Gross Avg. Day Peak Day Service Development Square Number Water Water city Type Footage of Units Demand Demand (MGD) (MGD) Residential 31,000 36 0.010 0.031 c 0 Commercial / c Office / 1,736,200 - 0.139 0.417 °o Industrial TOTAL 1,767,200 36 0.149 0.447 m Net Increase 940,128 - 0.075 0.226 Residential - - 0.000 0.000 M Commercial / C Office / 1,121,400 - 0.090 0.269 W Industrial TOTAL 1,121,400 - 0.090 0.269 Net Increase 44,472 - 0.004 0.011 For the Bloomington- serviced portion of the Gateway Study Area, full redevelopment under Scenario 1 would result in an increase in the peak day water demand of 0.226 MGD, bringing the total peak day water use within Bloomington to 39.826 MGD, which is still lower that the City's firm and total water capacity of 44 MGD. For the Edina - serviced portion of the Gateway Study Area, full redevelopment under Scenario 1 would result in an increase in the peak day water demand of 0.011 MGD, bringing the total peak day water use within Edina to 22.011 MGD. This value exceeds Edina's current firm capacity of 22.01 MGD, but is still below Edina's total capacity of 24.89 MGD. Impacts of Development Scenario 2 The redevelopment under Scenario 2 is modified from Scenario 1 to include less office and commercial space and more mixed -use and residential land uses. The same water usage design values that were used for Scenario 1 were utilized to determine the water demands for redevelopment under Scenario 2. Table 13 -3 shows the projected future water demands anticipated for Scenario 2. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 32 of 115 Table 13 -3. Future Water Demand for Scenario 2 For the Bloomington- serviced portion of the Gateway Study Area, full redevelopment under Scenario 2 would result in an increase in the peak day water demand of 1.048 MGD, bringing the total peak day water use within Bloomington to 40.648 MGD, which is still lower that the City's firm and total water capacity of 44 MGD. For the Edina - serviced portion of the Gateway Study Area, full redevelopment under Scenario 2 would result in an increase in the peak day water demand of 0.065 MGD, bringing the total peak day water use within Edina to 22.065 MGD. This value exceeds Edina's current firm capacity of 22.01 MGD, but is still below the City's total capacity of 24.89 MGD. Impacts of Development Scenario 3 Redevelopment densities in Scenario 3 maximize the office and commercial land uses within the Gateway Study Area, with existing residential uses remaining in- place. The same water usage design values that were used for Scenario 1 were utilized to determine the water demands for redevelopment under Scenario 3. Table 13 -4 shows the projected future water demands anticipated for Scenario 3. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 33 of 115 Gross Avg. Day Peak Day Service Development Square Number Water Water city Type Footage of Units Demand Demand (MGD) (MGD) Residential 826,000 848 0.242 0.725 Commercial / Cl) E Office / 2,268,600 - 0.181 0.544 °o Industrial TOTAL 3,094,600 848 0.423 1.270 m Net Increase 2,267,528 812 0.349 1.048 Residential 88,000 80 0.023 0.068 M Commercial / V Office / 1,064,000 - 0.085 0.255 w Industrial TOTAL 1,152,000 80 0.108 0.324 Net Increase 75,072 80 0.022 0.065 For the Bloomington- serviced portion of the Gateway Study Area, full redevelopment under Scenario 2 would result in an increase in the peak day water demand of 1.048 MGD, bringing the total peak day water use within Bloomington to 40.648 MGD, which is still lower that the City's firm and total water capacity of 44 MGD. For the Edina - serviced portion of the Gateway Study Area, full redevelopment under Scenario 2 would result in an increase in the peak day water demand of 0.065 MGD, bringing the total peak day water use within Edina to 22.065 MGD. This value exceeds Edina's current firm capacity of 22.01 MGD, but is still below the City's total capacity of 24.89 MGD. Impacts of Development Scenario 3 Redevelopment densities in Scenario 3 maximize the office and commercial land uses within the Gateway Study Area, with existing residential uses remaining in- place. The same water usage design values that were used for Scenario 1 were utilized to determine the water demands for redevelopment under Scenario 3. Table 13 -4 shows the projected future water demands anticipated for Scenario 3. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 33 of 115 Table 13 -4. Future Water Demand for Scenario 3 For the Bloomington- serviced portion of the Gateway Study Area, full redevelopment under Scenario 3 would result in an increase in the peak day water demand of 0.571 MGD, bringing the total peak day water use within Bloomington to 40.171 MGD, which is still lower that the City's firm and total water capacity of 44 MGD. For the Edina - serviced portion of the Gateway Study Area, full redevelopment under Scenario 3 would result in an increase in the peak day water demand of 0.077 MGD, bringing the total peak day water use within Edina to 22.077 MGD. This value exceeds Edina's current firm capacity of 22.01 MGD, but is still below the City's total capacity of 24.89 MGD. Impacts of Development Scenario 4 Redevelopment densities in Scenario 4 maximize the residential development within the Gateway Study Area, with some office and commercial land uses remaining within portions of the Gateway Study Area. The same water usage design values that were used for Scenario 1 were utilized to determine the water demands for redevelopment under Scenario 4. Table 13 -5 shows the projected future water demands anticipated for Scenario 4. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 34 of 115 Gross Avg. Day Peak Day Service Development Square Number Water Water City Type Footage of Units Demand Demand (MGD) (MGD) Residential 31,000 36 0.010 0.031 c Commercial / S Office / 3,174, 760 - 0.254 0.762 °o Industrial TOTAL 3,205,760 36 0.264 0.793 m Net Increase 2,378,688 - 0.190 0.571 Residential - - 0.000 0.000 M Commercial / Office / 1,397,840 - 0.112 0.335 uJ Industrial TOTAL 1,397,840 - 0.112 0.335 Net Increase 1 320,912 - 0.026 0.077 For the Bloomington- serviced portion of the Gateway Study Area, full redevelopment under Scenario 3 would result in an increase in the peak day water demand of 0.571 MGD, bringing the total peak day water use within Bloomington to 40.171 MGD, which is still lower that the City's firm and total water capacity of 44 MGD. For the Edina - serviced portion of the Gateway Study Area, full redevelopment under Scenario 3 would result in an increase in the peak day water demand of 0.077 MGD, bringing the total peak day water use within Edina to 22.077 MGD. This value exceeds Edina's current firm capacity of 22.01 MGD, but is still below the City's total capacity of 24.89 MGD. Impacts of Development Scenario 4 Redevelopment densities in Scenario 4 maximize the residential development within the Gateway Study Area, with some office and commercial land uses remaining within portions of the Gateway Study Area. The same water usage design values that were used for Scenario 1 were utilized to determine the water demands for redevelopment under Scenario 4. Table 13 -5 shows the projected future water demands anticipated for Scenario 4. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 34 of 115 Table 13 -5. Future Water Demand for Scenario 4 For the Bloomington- serviced portion of the Gateway Study Area, full redevelopment under Scenario 4 would result in an increase in the peak day water demand of 1.328 MGD, bringing the total peak day water use within Bloomington to 40.928 MGD, which is still lower that the City's firm and total water capacity of 44 MGD. For the Edina - serviced portion of the Gateway Study Area, full redevelopment under Scenario 4 would result in an increase in the peak day water demand of 0.082 MGD, bringing the total peak day water use within Edina to 22.082 MGD. This value exceeds Edina's current firm capacity of 22.01 MGD, but is still below the City's total capacity of 24.89 MGD. Common Development Impacts (all Scenarios) Since the Gateway Study Area is fully served by existing water mains, and the existing water pressures and fire flows are above minimum service levels, infrastructure upgrades to the existing system can be limited to repair and replacement of existing water mains, based mainly on their age and condition. Regardless of the type of redevelopment, as long as existing or new water mains remain in their current location and at the same size, the overall service pressures and fire flow values will not change. However, individual redevelopment may require the installation of service pumps to serve multi -story buildings and to provide adequate fire protection. The size and type of pumps will vary based on individual building characteristics, and should meet the existing local building and fire protection codes. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 35 of 115 Gross Avg. Day Peak Day Service Development Square Number Water Water City Type Footage of Units Demand Demand (MGD) (MGD) Residential 1,471,000 1,436 0.409 1.228 C 0 Commercial / E Office / 1,340,600 - 0.107 0.322 °o Industrial TOTAL 2,811,600 1,436 0.517 1.550 m Net Increase 1,984,528 1,400 0.443 1.328 Residential 110,000 100 0.029 0.086 �a Commercial / = M Office / 1,064,000 - 0.085 0.255 w Industrial TOTAL 1,174,000 100 0.114 0.341 Net Increase 97,072 100 0.027 0.082 For the Bloomington- serviced portion of the Gateway Study Area, full redevelopment under Scenario 4 would result in an increase in the peak day water demand of 1.328 MGD, bringing the total peak day water use within Bloomington to 40.928 MGD, which is still lower that the City's firm and total water capacity of 44 MGD. For the Edina - serviced portion of the Gateway Study Area, full redevelopment under Scenario 4 would result in an increase in the peak day water demand of 0.082 MGD, bringing the total peak day water use within Edina to 22.082 MGD. This value exceeds Edina's current firm capacity of 22.01 MGD, but is still below the City's total capacity of 24.89 MGD. Common Development Impacts (all Scenarios) Since the Gateway Study Area is fully served by existing water mains, and the existing water pressures and fire flows are above minimum service levels, infrastructure upgrades to the existing system can be limited to repair and replacement of existing water mains, based mainly on their age and condition. Regardless of the type of redevelopment, as long as existing or new water mains remain in their current location and at the same size, the overall service pressures and fire flow values will not change. However, individual redevelopment may require the installation of service pumps to serve multi -story buildings and to provide adequate fire protection. The size and type of pumps will vary based on individual building characteristics, and should meet the existing local building and fire protection codes. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 35 of 115 Under all scenarios, redevelopment within the portion of the Gateway Study Area that falls within Edina's water service area increases the peak :day water demand above the City's existing firm capacity, based on the 2002 Water Distribution System Analysis. However, Edina has performed some upgrades to its existing wells and pumping systems that have likely resulted in increased water system firm capacity that may be adequate to support the increase in peak day water demand. However, at the time of this Final AUAR, an updated comprehensive water system analysis had not been completed for all of Edina. In addition, Edina has expressed some interest in looping its water main system along West 77th Street to TH 100, and bringing the portions of the Gateway Study Area currently receiving water service from Bloomington into the Edina water system. This potential improvement would further require that an updated comprehensive water system analysis be performed, to ensure that Edina can handle the increase in water demand. While the Gateway Study Area is in a lower area of Edina, which is subject to higher water pressures and fire flows, the addition of water demand in this section of the City would likely reduce water pressure and fire flows within a different portion of the City. Further discussions between Edina and Bloomington will need to occur to determine what, if any, water system improvements are needed within the Gateway Study Area. Water Use Mitigation Measures • Edina will work with Bloomington to determine the needs for water system capacity improvements, water main upgrades, and future service to the Gateway Study Area. • In conjunction with their Comprehensive Plan update, Edina will complete an update to the 2002 Water Distribution System Analysis for the entire city to determine what current and future water system improvements may be necessary to continue to serve the City's water needs and maintain a water system firm capacity above the maximum daily water use within the City. • As redevelopment occurs, Edina will complete an analysis of the water mains within the Gateway Study Area to determine if performing water main replacement is necessary and if it should occur in conjunction with other potential infrastructure improvements, such as sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and transportation improvements. • Any abandoned wells found within the Gateway Study. Area will be sealed in accordance with Minnesota Department of Health guidelines. This will be the responsibility of the project proposer. • In accordance with Edina's Wellhead Protection Plan, continued protection of the existing Drinking Water Supply Management Areas located within the Gateway Study Area as shown in Figure 13 -1 will be required for redevelopment projects. • There is potential for areas that redevelop within the Bloomington service area to request to be served by Edina. If this occurs, additional analysis and water main improvements will need to be completed by Edina in coordination with Bloomington. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 36 of 115 • Individual redevelopment may require the installation of service pumps to serve multi -story buildings and to provide adequate fire protection. The size and type of pumps will vary based on individual building characteristics, should meet the existing local building and fire protection codes, and will be the responsibility of the developer. 14. WATER - RELATED LAND USE MANAGEMENT DISTRICTS. Does any part of the project involve a shoreland zoning district, a delineated 100 -year flood plain, or a state or federally designated wild or scenic river land use district? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, identify the district and discuss project compatibility with district land use restrictions. The FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map does not show any 100 -year floodplain within the Gateway Study Area. The Study Area is partially within Zone X, which indicates that some areas could be inundated in a 500 -year event. 15. WATER SURFACE USE. Will the project change the number or type of watercraft on any water body? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, indicate the current and projected watercraft usage and discuss any potential overcrowding or conflicts with other uses. 16. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION. Give the acreage to be graded or excavated and the cubic yards of soil to be moved: NA acres; NA cubic yards Describe any steep slopes or highly erodible soils and identify them on the site map. Describe any erosion and sedimentation control measures to be used during and after project construction Existing Conditions A detailed list of the soils present in the Study Area is provided in Item 19. The Study Area can be described as generally flat to gently sloping within the Gateway Study Area. Of the soils within in the area, there are none identified as highly erodible (HEL) or potentially highly erodible (PHEL) (see Figure 16 -1). Impacts of Development Scenarios 1 through 4 In all redevelopment scenarios, much of the Gateway Study Area would be graded in phases to facilitate the demolition and construction of individual buildings and associated infrastructure such as parking lots, roadways, and trails. It is anticipated that minor site grading will be needed to accommodate building layouts and storm water drainage from the area. Grading and earthwork to upgrade public utilities may also be needed. For the Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quad parcels that are currently proposed for redevelopment by the Developer, construction is anticipated to begin in 2008 and last for a City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 37 of 115 minimum of five years into 2013 and possibly beyond, depending on commercial office space and residential housing demand. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ( SWPPP) in conformance with the NPDES regulations will be needed for any redevelopment within the Gateway Study Area. Review of the SWPPP for any project disturbing more than one acre within the Study Area is required by Edina's Building Department. Additionally, any project that alters or disturbs more than 100 cubic yards of material is required to obtain a permit and meet regulations of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. These regulations require an erosion control plan to be submitted to the Watershed District for review and approval. Erosion and Sedimentation Mith!ation Plan • The S WPPP, including temporary and permanent seeding and staging plans, will be required to be submitted by each project proposer and reviewed by Edina. • The project proposer will need to develop an erosion control plan and submit this plan to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for review and approval. ® During construction, the project proposer and their contractor will implement Best Management Practices as needed to prevent erosion and sedimentation of downstream water resources. • Edina will develop a S WPPP and obtain an NPDES permit for the construction of any public infrastructure improvements (sanitary sewer, storm sewer, water main) that disturb one acre of land or more. • Edina will conduct erosion control inspections during construction. 17. WATER QUALITY — SURFACE WATER RUNOFF a. Compare the quantity and quality of site runoff before and after the project. Describe permanent controls to manage or treat runoff. Describe any storm water pollution prevention plans. b. Identify routes and receiving water bodies for runoff from the site; include major downstream water bodies as well as the immediate receiving waters. Estimate impact runoff on the quality of receiving waters. For purposes of the storm water analysis in this AUAR, the responses to Items 17a and 17b are included together in this section. Existing Conditions Based on the subwatersheds delineated in the Edina 2003 Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan, the Gateway Study Area is comprised of two major subwatersheds — the South Pond subwatershed and the Nine Mile Creek subwatershed. Figure 17 -1 shows Edina's City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 38 of 115 existing storm water infrastructure as well as subwatershed boundaries within the Gateway Study Area. The South Pond subwatershed consists of 65 acres that drain to a large pond located along the southern border of the Gateway Study Area that is referred to as South Pond or SP-1. This pond is within the Cities of Edina and Bloomington. This basin is identified as pond SP-1 in the Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan. Rate control is provided at this pond by the use of an outlet control structure that discharges to the existing storm sewer system under Viking Drive. This storm sewer conveys runoff under TH 100, and then discharges to Nine Mile Creek. Based on data in the Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan, the SP-1 pond does not have adequate dead -pool storage to meet the MPCA recommended permanent pool volume for treatment of storm water runoff. The Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan recommends this basin be expanded to provide an additional 19.6 acre -feet of dead -pool storage. The Cities of Edina and Bloomington have identified the need to expand the SP-1 pond to provide additional water quality treatment for the area. The Nine Mile Creek subwatershed consists of 70 acres that drain to Nine Mile Creek. There are several small basins located upstream of the Gateway Study Area that provide some rate control and storm water treatment. These basins are located adjacent to the Gateway Study Area on the Fred Richards Golf Course. Based on data in the Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan, the basins do not have adequate dead -pool storage to meet the MPCA recommended permanent pool volume for treatment of storm water runoff. The Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan recommends the golf course basins be expanded to increase phosphorus removal efficiency. The recommendation for the east basin, basin NMS 76, is an additional 2.5 acre -feet of dead -pool storage. There are two other ponds for which lowering the pond bottom was recommended, but the additional dead -pool volume is not quantified. These basins are identified as NMS 72 and NMS 74. The capacity of the existing storm sewer system within the Gateway Study Area appears to be near capacity under current design standards. The Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan identifies several manholes that are surcharged during a 10 -year storm event as shown on Figure 17 -1. Current design standards dictate that storm sewer pipe be sized to convey the peak runoff rate from a 10 -year storm under gravity flow (i.e. without surcharging). Edina staff has indicated two buildings, 4701 W 77' St W and 7799 France Ave S, have experienced flooding in the past. This may also be an indicator that the storm sewer is near capacity, although the flooding may have been caused by outside factors, such as clogged inlet grates. As stated, storm water from the Study Area eventually discharges to Nine Mile Creek. Nine Mile Creek is listed as an impaired water for turbidity, chloride, and biota (fish habitat). Information from the MPCA indicates that a Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) study for turbidity is currently underway with completion anticipated in 2009. The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District has requested that the Creek be delisted as impaired for biota based on their monitoring information and this information is being reviewed by the MPCA. No studies were underway for the chloride impairment as of June 2007. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 39 of 115 Through the MPCA's NPDES permit for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4's), Edina is a designated MS4 community and is developing a Nondegradation Plan to determine if there have been impacts from total suspended solids, total phosphorous, and volume since 1988. Edina is required to complete the Nondegradation Plan by January 2008. If there have been impacts in the City, Edina will need to develop a mitigation plan for reducing these impacts. Impacts of Development Scenarios 1 through 4 Four redevelopment scenarios have been analyzed in the Gateway Study Area. Proposed land uses include differing levels of residential, commercial, office, light industrial, and hotel and are shown in Figures 6 -1, 6 -2, 6 -3 and 6 -4. A review of the cover types for the existing conditions indicates that the amount of impervious surface throughout the Gateway Study Area is approximately 80% of the total area. For purposes of water quality and water quantity modeling, the impervious surface is considered to be directly connected to the storm water conveyance system. This is consistent with the assumptions made during preparation of the water quality modeling for the Comprehensive Water Resources Management Plan. As a part of this analysis, it was estimated that redevelopment will decrease the amount of impervious surface within the Study Area and use Low Impact Development (LID) techniques. These LID techniques are expected to reduce the amount of impervious area directly connected to the storm sewer system by 5 — 10 % depending on the land use for each property. It is estimated that LID techniques will be able to reduce the amount of directly connected impervious surface to 75% in all areas that are redeveloped. In areas where the land use is changed to commercial, residential, or a mixture thereof, it is assumed that this number will be further reduced to 70% as these areas will require more landscaping and amenities that can be incorporated into the redevelopment plan. The Developer of the Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quads sites outlined in Scenario 2 is proposing to utilize LID techniques within their parcels. Table 17 -1 provides a summary of the impervious areas assumed to be directly connected for the existing condition and each of the scenarios. Table 17 -1. Directly Connected Impervious Surface (Assumed Percentage of Gateway Study Area) Scenario % Impervious Surface Existing Conditions 80% Scenario 1 75% Scenario 2 74% Scenario 3 75% Scenario 4 73% City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 40 of 115 Water Ouantity Impacts The Gateway Study Area consists of approximately 80% impervious surfaces under existing conditions. It is anticipated that all four of the scenarios will result in a slight reduction in impervious surface. Table 17 -2 provides a summary of a generalized analysis of the volume of storm water discharge under the existing conditions and each of the redevelopment scenanos. Table 17 -2. Existing and proposed runoff volumes (acre -feet) This analysis is not based on a specific site plan. General assumptions regarding the land use and reductions in impervious surface were used. This information is intended for planning purposes only. Since all four of the scenarios are anticipated to result in a slight reduction in impervious surface, runoff rates and volumes of surface runoff exiting the Study Area will be reduced. Based on this, it has been determined that the proposed redevelopment scenarios will not adversely affect the 100 -year high water elevation of the downstream resources and should not increase downstream flooding for the 100 -year event. However, if the Study Area redevelops with the same or additional impervious surface, downstream impacts are anticipated to occur, as they do in the existing conditions. Redevelopment within the Gateway Study Area will be required to limit peak runoff rates and reduce the runoff volume so as not to negatively impact the existing storm sewer system. If impervious surfaces are reduced as part of redevelopment, it is anticipated that the redevelopment will require only minimal changes, if any, to the existing storm sewer pipe network. Water Ouality Impacts In the existing conditions, storm water is discharged either into existing ponds or directly to Nine Mile Creek. The reductions in runoff rate and volume anticipated as a result of the use of LID techniques and reduced impervious surface will result in less pollutant loading to these systems. Tables 17 -3 and 17 -4 provide a summary of a generalized analysis of the storm water quality for the existing conditions and each scenario. Table 17 -3. Total Suspended Solids Loading (lbs per year) Existing Existing Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 Conditions Rainfall Event Conditions Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 South Pond 100 -year, 24- 26.3 25.7 25.1 25.7 25.1 Subwatershed hour 3,890 Nine Mile Nine Mile 100 -year, 24- 28.4 27.7 27.1 27.7 27.1 Subwatershed hour This analysis is not based on a specific site plan. General assumptions regarding the land use and reductions in impervious surface were used. This information is intended for planning purposes only. Since all four of the scenarios are anticipated to result in a slight reduction in impervious surface, runoff rates and volumes of surface runoff exiting the Study Area will be reduced. Based on this, it has been determined that the proposed redevelopment scenarios will not adversely affect the 100 -year high water elevation of the downstream resources and should not increase downstream flooding for the 100 -year event. However, if the Study Area redevelops with the same or additional impervious surface, downstream impacts are anticipated to occur, as they do in the existing conditions. Redevelopment within the Gateway Study Area will be required to limit peak runoff rates and reduce the runoff volume so as not to negatively impact the existing storm sewer system. If impervious surfaces are reduced as part of redevelopment, it is anticipated that the redevelopment will require only minimal changes, if any, to the existing storm sewer pipe network. Water Ouality Impacts In the existing conditions, storm water is discharged either into existing ponds or directly to Nine Mile Creek. The reductions in runoff rate and volume anticipated as a result of the use of LID techniques and reduced impervious surface will result in less pollutant loading to these systems. Tables 17 -3 and 17 -4 provide a summary of a generalized analysis of the storm water quality for the existing conditions and each scenario. Table 17 -3. Total Suspended Solids Loading (lbs per year) This analysis is not based on a specific site plan. General assumptions regarding the land use and reductions in impervious surface were used. This information is intended for planning purposes only. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 41 of 115 Existing Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 Conditions South Pond Subwatershed 4,264 3,997 3,943 3,997 3,890 Nine Mile Subwatershed 4,591 4,304 4,247 4,304 4,189 This analysis is not based on a specific site plan. General assumptions regarding the land use and reductions in impervious surface were used. This information is intended for planning purposes only. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 41 of 115 Table 17 -4. Total Phosphorus Loading (lbs Der vear) This analysis is not based on a specific site plan. General assumptions regarding the land use and reductions in impervious surface were used. This information is intended for planning purposes only. Based on this analysis, none of the scenarios are anticipated to have a negative impact to on- site or downstream water bodies when reduced impervious and LID techniques are used. However, if redevelopment does not reduce impervious surfaces, the total suspended solids and phosphorus loadings are anticipated to be similar to the existing conditions or may increase. Increasing these loadings will not be allowed as part of redevelopment within the Study Area. While LID techniques are not mandated, the presence of a high ground water table may limit the effectiveness and feasibility of storm water treatment ponds with permanent pool volume. Redevelopment in the area will be required to reduce downstream pollutant loadings through reduced impervious surfaces and /or use of alternative storm water treatment methods such as LID. Simply re- developing the Study Area with the same amount of impervious surface and not providing any alternative storm water management techniques will not meet the requirements of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Water Quality — Surface Water Runoff Mitigation Plan • Redevelopment projects will be required to be designed to meet the policies of the most current Edina Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. • Redevelopment projects will be required to be designed to meet the policies of the most current Nine Mile Creek Watershed District requirements. • Redevelopment within the Gateway Study Area will be required to limit peak runoff rates to at least existing conditions and reduce the runoff volume so as not to negatively impact the existing storm sewer system. • Redevelopment needs to reduce the amount of impervious surface within the project limits or develop a site specific storm water management plan that shows that the project will not impact downstream pollutant or volume loading. • If warranted by Edina's Nondegradation Plan (completion anticipated in January 2008), project proposer(s) will need to include storm water management strategies that reduce the total suspended solid loadings, total phosphorous pollutant loadings, and storm water runoff volumes from the Gateway Study Area. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 42 of 115 Existing Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 Conditions South Pond Subwatershed 20 19 19 19 18 Nine Mile Subwatershed 1 22 1 20 20 20 20 This analysis is not based on a specific site plan. General assumptions regarding the land use and reductions in impervious surface were used. This information is intended for planning purposes only. Based on this analysis, none of the scenarios are anticipated to have a negative impact to on- site or downstream water bodies when reduced impervious and LID techniques are used. However, if redevelopment does not reduce impervious surfaces, the total suspended solids and phosphorus loadings are anticipated to be similar to the existing conditions or may increase. Increasing these loadings will not be allowed as part of redevelopment within the Study Area. While LID techniques are not mandated, the presence of a high ground water table may limit the effectiveness and feasibility of storm water treatment ponds with permanent pool volume. Redevelopment in the area will be required to reduce downstream pollutant loadings through reduced impervious surfaces and /or use of alternative storm water treatment methods such as LID. Simply re- developing the Study Area with the same amount of impervious surface and not providing any alternative storm water management techniques will not meet the requirements of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. Water Quality — Surface Water Runoff Mitigation Plan • Redevelopment projects will be required to be designed to meet the policies of the most current Edina Comprehensive Storm Water Management Plan. • Redevelopment projects will be required to be designed to meet the policies of the most current Nine Mile Creek Watershed District requirements. • Redevelopment within the Gateway Study Area will be required to limit peak runoff rates to at least existing conditions and reduce the runoff volume so as not to negatively impact the existing storm sewer system. • Redevelopment needs to reduce the amount of impervious surface within the project limits or develop a site specific storm water management plan that shows that the project will not impact downstream pollutant or volume loading. • If warranted by Edina's Nondegradation Plan (completion anticipated in January 2008), project proposer(s) will need to include storm water management strategies that reduce the total suspended solid loadings, total phosphorous pollutant loadings, and storm water runoff volumes from the Gateway Study Area. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 42 of 115 • Any redevelopment project that disturbs more than one acre of land is required to develop a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan and obtain an NPDES permit from the MPCA. • Edina and project proposer(s) will investigate the expansion of the existing ponding areas within the Fred Richards Golf Course to provide additional storage and treatment as outlined in Edina's Water Resource Management Plan. • The Cities of Edina and Bloomington will petition the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District to expand the SP_1 pond to provide additional storm water treatment for the area. • As TMDL studies are completed for Nine Mile Creek, the results of these studies will be reviewed by Edina. Redevelopment in the Study Area will be required to meet any mitigation and pollutant load reductions that may be outlined within the TMDL studies. • The project proposer will review and determine which Low Impact Development (LID) practices are feasible to be used for each parcel. Edina will review the LID techniques and encourage their use to the greatest extent possible. • A maintenance plan is required to be reviewed and approved by the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for privately constructed and maintained storm water management facilities. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 43 of 115 18. WATER QUALITY - WASTEWATER a. Describe sources, composition and quantities of all sanitary, municipal and industrial wastewater produced or treated at the site. b. Describe waste treatment methods or pollution prevention efforts and give estimates of composition after treatment. Identify receiving waters, including major downstream water bodies, and estimate the discharge impact on the quality of receiving waters. If the project involves on -site sewage systems, discuss the suitability of site conditions for such systems. c. If wastes will be discharged into a publicly owned treatment facility, identify the facility, describe any pretreatment provisions and discuss the facility's ability to handle the volume and composition of wastes, identifying any improvements necessary. d. If the project requires disposal of liquid animal manure, describe disposal technique and location and discuss capacity to handle the volume and composition of manure. Identify any improvements necessary. Describe any required setbacks for land disposal systems. For purposes of the wastewater analysis in this A UAR, the responses to Items 18a -d are included together in this section. Existing Conditions According to Edina's 2020 Comprehensive Plan, the estimated average wastewater flow for the entire City in 2007 is 2.75 billion gallons per year, or roughly 7.5 million gallons per day (gpd), with a peak flow of 16.5 million gpd. Since the wastewater generated from Edina is primarily from residential units, the wastewater characteristics are assumed to be of typical domestic strength. Table 18 -1 is a summary of the estimated wastewater characteristics for Edina. Table 18 -1. Estimated Wastewater Characteristics and Total Average Daily Wastewater Loading for Edina Parameter Estimated Wastewater Characteristics and Avera •e D ily Loading mg - lbs /day Biochemical Oxygen Demand 220 13,755 Total Suspended Solids 220 13,755 Ammonia —Nitrogen 25 1,563 Total Phosphorous 8 499 Wastewater generated from Edina is collected by a series of lift stations, laterals, and trunk sewer mains, and is then directed to a series of MCES sanitary sewer interceptors. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 44 of 115 The Gateway Study Area is currently served by existing, sanitary sewer located within public right -of -way. Sanitary sewer flow within the Gateway Study Area is divided into three sanitary service areas. Figure 18 -1 shows the existing layout of sanitary sewer and the sanitary sewer service areas within and adjacent to the Gateway Study Area. Sanitary Service Area A The western portion of the Gateway Study Area (west of Parklawn Avenue) is noted as Sanitary Service Area A on Figure 18 -1. It is serviced by a 9 -inch lateral sanitary sewer line that flows south into Bloomington along Computer Avenue. At Viking Drive, the sanitary sewer changes from a 9 -inch lateral sewer owned by Edina to the 18 -inch MCES BN -499 Interceptor. This interceptor was constructed in 1997 to replace a 10 -inch sanitary sewer line between the Bloomington/Edina border and I -494. The increase in size was intended to provide for additional sanitary sewer capacity to areas of Bloomington and Edina bounded by TH 100, France Avenue, 77th Street West, and I -494. The MCES BN -499 Interceptor connects to an MCES lift station southeast of TH 100 and I -494. The lift station pumps through a 12 -inch force main south to West 84h Street, where a gravity sewer collects flow and directs it to the Seneca Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) in Eagan. The Seneca WWTP has a design capacity of 39 MGD and provides primary and secondary treatment. Disposal of treated wastewater from the Seneca WWTP is discharged into the Minnesota River. Sanitary Service Area B The area east of Parklawn Avenue, split mainly by 76h Street West, is noted as Sanitary Service Area B on Figure 18 -1. This area is serviced by 12 -inch through 24 -inch trunk sanitary sewer that flows north to Edina Lift Station No. 6, located near the intersection of 72 "d Street West and Oaklawn Avenue. This lift station is being rehabilitated by Edina in 2007 to increase the pump efficiency and restore the design capacity of the lift station, which serves approximately 50% of Edina's sanitary sewer service area. This lift station pumps through a 9 -inch force main to the east and discharges into the MCES Richfield -491 Interceptor Sewer. This interceptor then directs flow to the Metropolitan WWTP in St. Paul. The Metro WWTP has a design capacity of 251 MGD and provides primary and secondary treatment. Disposal of treated wastewater from the Metro WWTP is discharged into the Mississippi River. Sanitary Service Area C The two remaining parcels immediately adjacent to France Avenue within the Gateway Study Area are noted as Sanitary Service Area C on Figure 18 -1. This area is serviced by an 8 -inch sanitary sewer that flows east across France Avenue to Edina Lift Station No. 2, located immediately east of the Gateway Study Area on the east side of France Avenue. Like Sanitary Service Area B, the flow from this lift station pumped through a 10 -inch force main to the north and east and discharges into the MCES Richfield -491 Interceptor Sewer, where it eventually flows to the Metro WWTP. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 45 of 115 Current Flow The current land use in the Gateway Study Area consists of commercial office space, warehousing, light industrial land uses, and recently- approved residential development, in accordance with Edina's existing 2020 Comprehensive Plan. Based on the existing building areas and total square footages, a total wastewater generation was estimated using a MCES equivalent value of 2,400 gsf of finished building area per individual SAC unit. One SAC unit is equivalent to 274 gallons of wastewater per day. The MCES peaking factors are also utilized to account for peak wastewater flows, which range from 3.8 to 4.0. Table 18 -2 below summarizes the total building areas and estimated wastewater flows per land use type for the existing conditions. Table 18 -2. Estimated Average Day and Peak Hour Wastewater Flow for Existing Conditions Table 18 -3 summarizes the estimated wastewater characteristics and loading for the wastewater under the existing development conditions within the Gateway Study Area. Table 18 -3. Estimated Wastewater Characteristics and Total Average Daily Wastewater Loading for Existing Conditions Parameter WWTP Gross m /l Total Biochemical Oxygen Demand Metro Service Square Equivalent Average Daily Peak Hour Type Area Footage Residential Wastewater Wastewater 25 (Non- Units Flow Flow (MGD) Metro 8 Res.) Seneca 7 MGD Commercial A 795,000 331 0.092 0.388 Office & B 588,000 245 0.067 0.268 Warehousing C 489,000 204 0.056 0.224 A - 36 0.010 0.040 Onsite Residential B - - - - C - - - - Total - 1,872,000 816 0.225 0.920 Table 18 -3 summarizes the estimated wastewater characteristics and loading for the wastewater under the existing development conditions within the Gateway Study Area. Table 18 -3. Estimated Wastewater Characteristics and Total Average Daily Wastewater Loading for Existing Conditions Parameter WWTP Estimated Wastewater Characteristics and Average Day Loading m /l Ibs /da Biochemical Oxygen Demand Metro 220 217 Seneca 188 Total Suspended Solids 220 Seneca 188 Ammonia - Nitrogen 25 Seneca 21 Total Phosphorous Metro 8 8 Seneca 7 City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 46 of 115 Under the existing conditions, approximately 47 percent (0.428 MGD) of the peak flow generated from the Gateway Study Area is directed south through the MCES BN -499 Interceptor sewer (Sanitary Service Area A). Approximately 29 percent (0.268 MGD) of the peak flow generated is directed north along Parklawn Avenue (Sanitary Service Area B). The remaining 24 percent (0.224 MGD) of the peak flow discharges across France Avenue to an existing lift station (Sanitary Service Area Q. See Figure 18 -1 for sanitary sewer service areas and locations. Existing Municipal Sewer System The Gateway Study Area consists of three separate sanitary sewer drainage areas (See Figure 18 -1). Sanitary Service Area A encompasses the majority of the Gateway Study Area, and includes portions of Bloomington. The existing MCES BN -499 Interceptor located along Computer Avenue to Lift Station No. 10 in Bloomington is in good condition and has not exhibited any previous capacity issues since being constructed in 1997. Lift Station No. 10 is owned by the MCES and is operated and maintained by Bloomington. Data obtained for Lift Station No. 10 indicates that it is operating two 700 gallon per minute pumps at a firm capacity of 0.874 MGD peak flow, which is approximately 87% of the lift station's total firm capacity of 1.008 MGD. Firm capacity is the capacity of operating one pump at a time. Downstream of this lift station is a 15 -inch MCES interceptor sewer that flows east along 84`h Street West for approximately 2,000 feet. Based on data provided by Bloomington, this interceptor is flowing at or above capacity during existing peak flow periods. The MCES is currently in the process of verifying and evaluating options for relieving this situation through sanitary sewer upsizing or regulation of lift station pumping cycles. Downstream of this sewer, the interceptor size increases to 21- inches, and is adequately sized to handle the existing flows. The sanitary sewer system in Sanitary Service Area B flows north along Parklawn Avenue into an Edina trunk sanitary sewer along Oaklawn Avenue, where it is directed to Edina Lift Station No. 6. Edina is rehabilitating this lift station by replacing replace the existing pumps in order to increase the pumping efficiency and maintain the design capacity of the lift station. There are no evident capacity issues at the lift station or the sanitary sewers flowing to or from this lift station. This also holds true for the Richfield -491 Interceptor under the existing conditions. The sanitary sewer system in Sanitary Service Area C flows east across France Avenue into Edina Lift Station No. 22. Edina plans on rehabilitating this lift station in 2008 to replace the existing pumps and increase the lift station pumping efficiency. There are no known capacity issues with this lift station or the sanitary sewer downstream of the lift station. This also holds true for the Richfield -491 Interceptor under the existing conditions. Impacts of Development Scenarios For the purposes of this AUAR, it is assumed that the sanitary sewer system in each of the service areas (A, B, and C) will continue to perform as they do currently, and any improvements will include replacement or modifications in the same locations (i.e., no new sanitary sewer City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 47 of 115 alignments will be created). For areas outside the Gate*, ay Study Area that contribute flow to the individual sanitary service areas, existing land use data, including existing building square footage, was utilized to determine the existing development density and sanitary sewer flows. These flows were verified utilizing measured flow values provided by Edina and Bloomington. As part of the analysis in this AUAR for cumulative impacts, there are no other known redevelopments occurring within Sanitary Sewer Service Area A shown on Figure 18 -1 that are outside of the Gateway Study Area that would impact the MCES BN -499 Interceptor and MCES Lift Station No. 10 immediately downstream of the Gateway Study Area. Similarly, there are no other known redevelopments occurring within Sanitary Sewer Service B shown on Figure 18 -1 that are outside of the Gateway Study Area that would impact Edina Lift Station No. 6, Edina trunk sanitary sewer, or the MCES Richfield -491 Interceptor. Sanitary Sewer Service Area C is fully within the Gateway Study Area and therefore all impacts within this service area have been analyzed in the AUAR. Impacts of Development Scenario 1 The majority of redevelopment under Scenario 1 would consist of commercial office space or warehousing, with some existing residential development, which is consistent with Edina's Comprehensive Plan. As was the case for the existing sanitary flow conditions, flows for commercial and industrial property, were calculated based on an equivalent number of residential units utilizing the MCES estimate of 2,400 gsf of finished building area per individual SAC unit. One SAC unit is equivalent to 274 gallons of wastewater per day. For all residential units, an average daily wastewater flow of 274 gpd per unit was used. Table 18 -4 below summarizes the number of units under this scenario and the wastewater generated. Peaking factors recommended by the MCES based on average daily flows vary from 3.8 to 4.0 are used to determine the peak hour flow. Future wastewater flow for the Gateway Study Area under Scenario 1 is shown below in Table 18 -4. Table 18 -5 summarizes the estimated wastewater characteristics and loading for the wastewater that will be generated under Scenario 1. Table 18 -4. Estimated Average Day and Peak Hour Wastewater Flow from Scenario 1 City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 48 of 115 Gross Total Service Square Equivalent Average Daily Peak Hoµf _ Type Area Footage Residential Wastewater Wastewater (Non- Units Flow Flow (MGD) Res.) MGD Commercial A 1,736,000 723 0.198 0.752 B 602,000 251 0.069 0.269 Office & Warehousing C 519,000 216 0.059 0.236 A 36 0.010 0.038 Onsite B - - Residential C - - Total 1 2,857,000 1 1,226 0.336 1.296 City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 48 of 115 Table 18 -5. Estimated Wastewater Characteristics and Total Average Daily Wastewater Loading from Scenario 1 Parameter WWTP Estimated Wastewater Characteristics and Average Day Loading Increase Over Existing Loads m /I Ibs/day Ibs /da Biochemical Oxygen Demand Metro 220 267 51 Seneca 419 230 Total Suspended Solids Metro 220 267 51 Seneca 419 230 Ammonia - Nitrogen Metro 25 31 6 Seneca 48. 27 Total Phosphorous Metro 8 10 2 Seneca 15 8 Under this scenario approximately 61 percent (0.790 MGD) of the peak flow generated from the Gateway Study Area will be diverted south through the MCES BN -499 Interceptor sewer (Sanitary Service Area A). Approximately 21 percent (0.269 MGD) of the peak flow generated will be directed along Parklawn Avenue to Lift Station No. 6 (Sanitary Service Area B). The remaining 18 percent (0.236 MGD) of the peak flow discharges across France Avenue to Lift Station No. 22 (Sanitary Service Area C). Table 18 -6 provides a breakdown of the sanitary sewer capacity analysis for each sanitary service area under Scenario 1. Based on this analysis, it is evident that potential redevelopment that occurs within Sanitary Service Area A may lead to downstream sanitary sewer system capacity issues, mainly at the MCES Bloomington Lift Station No. 10, and will warrant the upsizing of the 9 -inch sanitary sewer along Computer Avenue to a 12 -inch sanitary sewer. The threshold sanitary sewer flow that can be added to the Gateway Study Area without any sanitary sewer improvements based on capacity, is approximately 125 SAC units, which translates to approximately 300,000 gsf of additional office, warehousing, or industrial redevelopment in this portion of the Gateway Study Area. This value is based on the existing capacity of Lift Station No. 10. Additional redevelopment exceeding 270 SAC units, which translates to approximately 648,000 gsf of additional office, warehousing or industrial redevelopment that directs flow to Computer Avenue, would warrant the upsizing of the 9 -inch sanitary sewer along Computer Avenue. The addition of any flow will further increase the insufficient capacity issues of the MCES interceptor along West 84t' Street until capacity improvements can be accomplished by the MCES and Bloomington. Sanitary sewer within Sanitary Service Area B and C is adequately sized to handle the increase in flows that are proposed under Scenario 1. Downstream upgrades to Edina Lift Stations No. 6 and No. 22 which are part of the City's Capital Improvement Program can adequately handle the increase in flows as a result of redevelopment. The same holds true for Edina's downstream trunk sanitary sewer and the MCES Richfield -491 interceptor serving these areas. City of Edina Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 49 of 115 Table 18 -6: Sewer Capacity Analysis for Scenario 1 rcaK riow measurea at tnoommgton L.J. No. w for service Area A; rarklawn Avenue at Uakiawn Avenue cutoff for Service Area B; and Edina L.S. No. 22 for Service Area C. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 50 of 115 Existing Proposed Gateway Gateway Existing Study Study Flow Direction Downstream Area Existin Combined Flows Area Proposed Combined Flows Downstream Adequate & Service Area Total Total Total Total Increase Capacity Sizing 9 Average Flow Average Average Peak Peak Average Average Peak Peak in Peak Percent (MGD) (MGD) Flow Flow Flow Flow Flow Flow Flow Flow Flow Change (MGD) (MGD) Factor (MGD) (MGD) (MGD) Factor (MGD) ( MGD ` n Flow" Commercial 0.130 0.091 0.221 0.198 0.328 Residential 0.010 1 0.010 0.010 A 1 Total 0.130 0.101 1 0.231 1 3.8 1 0.878 0.208 0.338 1 3.7 1 1.251 0.373 1 42% 1.008 NO Commercial 0161 0.067 0.228 0.069 0.230 Residential 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 B 1.616 YES Total 1 0.161 0.067 0.228 3.8 0.866 0.069 0.230 1 3.7 1 0.851 -0.015 1 -2% Commercial 0.000 0.056 0.056 0.059 0.059 Residential 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 C Total 0.000 0.056 0.056 4 0.224 0.059 0.059 4 0.236 0.012 1 5% 0.494 YES rcaK riow measurea at tnoommgton L.J. No. w for service Area A; rarklawn Avenue at Uakiawn Avenue cutoff for Service Area B; and Edina L.S. No. 22 for Service Area C. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 50 of 115 Impacts of Development Scenario 2: The redevelopment under Scenario 2 would consist of a mix of commercial office space, retail, multi - family residential, warehousing, and would also include a 150 -room hotel. The office space and warehousing sanitary sewer loading is calculated the same as in Scenario 1 with the application of MCES peaking factors. For the hotel, per MCES guidelines, every two rooms are equal to one SAC unit. Anticipated wastewater flow for the Gateway Study Area under Scenario 2 is shown below in Table 18 -7. Table 18 -8 summarizes the estimated wastewater characteristics and loading for the wastewater that will be generated under Scenario 2. Cable 18 -7. Estimated Average Day and Peak Hour Wastewater Flow from Scena Ibs /da Ibs /da Gross Metro Total 255 38 Seneca Square Equivalent Average Peak Hour Type Service Footage Residential Daily Wastewater Ammonia - Nitrogen Area (Non- Units Wastewater Flow (MGD) 109 87 Res.) Metro Flow 9 1 Seneca 35 28 MGD A 2,269,000 945 0.259 0.907 Commercial Office & B 545,000 227 0.062 0.248 Warehousing C 519,000 216 0.059 0.236 A 848 0.232 0.812 Onsite Residential B 80 0.022 0.088 C - - Total - 3,333,000 2,316 0.634 2.291 Table 18 -8. Estimated Wastewater Characteristics and Total Average Daily Wastewater Loading from Scenario 2 rio 2 Parameter WWTP Estimated Wastewater Characteristics and Average Day Loading Increase Over Existing Loads m /I Ibs /da Ibs /da Biochemical Oxygen Demand Metro 220 255 38 Seneca 950 762 Total Suspended Solids Metro 220 255 38 Seneca 950 762 Ammonia - Nitrogen Metro 25 29 5 Seneca 109 87 Total Phosphorous Metro 8 9 1 Seneca 35 28 City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review June 2007 Page 51 of 115 Under this scenario approximately 75 percent (1.719 MGD) of the peak flow generated from the Gateway Study Area will be diverted south through the MCES BN -499 Interceptor sewer (Sanitary Service Area A). Approximately 15 percent (0.336 MGD) of the peak flow generated will be directed north along Parklawn Avenue to Lift Station No. 6 (Sanitary Service Area B). The remaining 10 percent (0.236 MGD)'of the peak flow discharges directly across France Avenue to Lift Station No. 22 (Sanitary Service Area Q. Table 18 -9 provides a breakdown of the sanitary sewer capacity analysis for each sanitary service area under Scenario 2. Based on this analysis, it is evident that potential redevelopment that occurs within Sanitary Service Area A may lead to downstream sanitary capacity issues, mainly at the MCES Bloomington Lift Station No. 10, and will warrant the upsizing of the 9 -inch sanitary sewer along Computer Avenue to a 15 -inch sanitary sewer. The threshold sanitary sewer flow that can be added to the Gateway Study Area without any sanitary sewer improvements, based on capacity, is the same as Scenario 1, and is approximately 125 SAC units, which translate to approximately 300,000 gsf of additional office, warehousing, or industrial development in this portion of the Gateway Study Area. This value is based on the existing capacity of Lift Station No. 10. Additional redevelopment exceeding 270 SAC units, which translate to approximately 648,000 gsf of additional office, warehousing or industrial redevelopment that directs flow to Computer Avenue, would warrant the upsizing of the 9 7inch sanitary sewer along Computer Avenue. The addition of any flow will further increase the insufficient capacity issues of the MCES interceptor along West 84`h Street until capacity improvements can be accomplished by the MCES and Bloomington. Sanitary sewer within Sanitary Service Area B and C is adequately sized to handle the increase in flows that are proposed under Scenario 2. Downstream upgrades to Edina Lift Stations No. 6 and No. 22 which are part of the City's Capital Improvement Program can adequately handle the increase in flows as a result of redevelopment. The same holds true for Edina's downstream trunk sanitary sewer and the MCES Richfield -491 interceptor serving these areas. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review June 2007 Page 52 of 115 Table 18 -9: Sewer Capacity Analysis for Scenario 2 * Peak Flow measured at Bloomington L.S. No. 10 for Service Area A; Parklawn Avenue at Oaklawn Avenue cutoff for Service Area B; and Edina L.S. No. 22 for Service Area C. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 53 of 115 Existing Proposed Gateway Gateway Flow Direction Existing Downstream Study Area Existing Combined Flows Study Area Proposed Combined Flows Downstream Adequate & Service Area Average Flow (MGD) Average Flow (MGD) Total Average Flow (MGD) Peak Flow Factor Total Peak Flow (MGD) Average Flow (MGD) Total Average Flow (MGD) Peak Flow Factor Total Peak Flow (MGD)* Increase in Peak Flow (MGD)" Percent Change in Flow" Capacity ( MGD ) Sizing A Commercial 0.130 0.091 0.221 0.259 0.389 Residential 0.010 0.010 0.232 0.232 1.008 NO Total 0.130 0.101 0.231 3.8 0.878 0.491 0.621 3.4 2.111 1.234 141% B Commercial 0'161 0.067 0.228 0.062 0.223 Residential 0.000 0.000 0.022 0.022 1.616 YES Total 0.161 1 0.067 0.228 3.8 0.866 0.084 0.245 3.7 0.907 1 0.040 1 5% C Commercial 0.000 0.056 0.056 0.059 0.059 Residential 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Total 0.000 0.056 0.056 4 0.224 0.059 0.059 4 0.236 0.012 5% 0.494 YES * Peak Flow measured at Bloomington L.S. No. 10 for Service Area A; Parklawn Avenue at Oaklawn Avenue cutoff for Service Area B; and Edina L.S. No. 22 for Service Area C. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 53 of 115 Impacts of Development Scenario 3: The redevelopment under this scenario would consist of the maximum amount of commercial space and warehousing. The commercial space and warehousing sanitary sewer loading is calculated the same as the previous scenarios. Peaking factors recommended by the MCES based on average daily flows vary from 3.6 to 4.0 were used to determine the peak hour flow. Future wastewater flow for the Gateway Study Area under Scenario 3 is shown below in Table 18 -10. Table 18 -11 summarizes the estimated wastewater characteristics and loading for the wastewater that will be generated under Scenario 3. Table 18 -10. Estimated Average Day and Peak Hour Wastewater Flow from Scen Estimated Wastewater Characteristics and Average Day Loading Increase Over Existing Loads Gross Ibs /da Total Biochemical Oxygen Demand Metro Service Square Equivalent Average Daily Peak Hour Type Area Footage Residential Wastewater Wastewater Seneca 704 (Non- Units Flow Flow (MGD) 38 13 Res.) 80 MGD Total Phosphorous Commercial A 3,175,000 1,323 0.363 1.307 19 Office & B 879,000 366 0.100 0.390 Warehousing C 519,000 216 0.059 0.236 A 36 0.010 0.036 Onsite B - - - Residential C - - Total 1 4,573,000 1,941 0.532 1.969 Table 18 -11. Estimated Wastewater Characteristics and Total Average Daily Wastewater Loading from Scenario 3 ario 3 Parameter WWTP Estimated Wastewater Characteristics and Average Day Loading Increase Over Existing Loads m /I Ibs /da Ibs /da Biochemical Oxygen Demand Metro 220 328 112 Seneca 704 515 Total Suspended Solids Metro 220 328 112 Seneca 704 515 Ammonia - Nitrogen Metro 25 38 13 Seneca 80 59 Total Phosphorous Metro 8 1 12 4 Seneca 26 19 City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 54 of 115 Under this scenario approximately 68 percent (1.343 MGD) of the peak flow generated from the Gateway Study Area will be diverted south through the MCES BN -499 Interceptor sewer (Sanitary Service Area A). Approximately 20 percent (0.390 MGD) of the peak flow generated will be directed north along Parklawn Avenue to Lift Station No. 6 (Sanitary Service Area B). The remaining 12 percent (0.236 MGD) of the peak flow discharges across France Avenue to Lift Station No. 22 (Sanitary Service Area C). Table 18 -12 provides a breakdown of the sanitary sewer capacity analysis for each sanitary service area under Scenario 3. Based on this analysis, it is evident that potential redevelopment that occurs within Sanitary Service Area A may lead to downstream sanitary capacity issues, mainly at the MCES Bloomington Lift Station No. 10, and will warrant the upsizing of the 9 -inch sanitary sewer along Computer Avenue to a 15 -inch sanitary sewer. The threshold sanitary sewer flow that can be added to the Gateway Study Area without any sanitary sewer improvements, based on capacity, is the same as Scenario 1 and Scenario 2, and is approximately 125 SAC units, which translate to approximately 300,000 gsf of additional office, warehousing, or industrial redevelopment in this portion of the Gateway Study Area. This value is based on the existing capacity of Lift Station No. 10. Additional redevelopment exceeding 270 SAC units, which translate to approximately 648,000 gsf of additional office, warehousing or industrial redevelopment that directs flow to Computer Avenue, would warrant the upsizing of the 9 -inch sanitary sewer along Computer Avenue. The addition of any flow will further increase the insufficient capacity issues of the MCES interceptor along West 84th Street until capacity improvements can be accomplished by the MCES and Bloomington. Sanitary sewer within Sanitary Service Area B and C is adequately sized to handle the increase in flows that are proposed under Scenario 3. Downstream upgrades to Edina Lift Stations No. 6 and No. 22 which are part of the City's Capital Improvement Program can adequately handle the increase in flows as a result of redevelopment. The same holds true for Edina's downstream trunk sanitary sewer and the MCES Richfield -491 interceptor serving these areas. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 55 of 115 Table 18 -12: Sewer Capacity Analysis for Scenario 3 - reaK r iow measures at t5wommgion L.S. ivo. i u for service Area A; rarKlawn Avenue at UaklaWn Avenue cutoff for Service Area B; and Edina L.S. No. 22 for Service Area C. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 56 of 115 Existing Proposed Gateway Gateway Existing Study Study Flow Direction & Service Area Downstream Area Existing Combined Flows Area Proposed Combined Flows Downstream _ Capacity (MGD) Adequate Sizing Average Flow (MGD) Average Flow (MGD) Total Average Flow (MGD) Peak Flow Factor Total Peak Flow (MGD ) Average Flow Total Average Flow (MGD) MGD ) Peak Flow Factor Total Peak Flow (MGD)- Increase in Peak Flow (MGD • Percent n Flow" A Commercial 0.130 0.091 0.221 0.363 0.493 Residential 0.010 0.010 0.010 0.010 1.008 Nd Total 0.130 0.101 0.231 3.8 0.878 0.373 0.503 1 3.5 1.761 1 0.883 101% B Commercial 1 0161 0.067--r-0.228 0.1 0.261 Residential 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 Total 1 0.161 1 0.067 1 0.228 1 3.8 1 0.866 1 0.1 1 0.261 1 3.6 1 0.940 1 0.073 8% 1 1.616 YES C Commercial 0.000 0.056 0.056 0.059 0.059 Residential 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Total 0.000 0.056 0.056 4 0.224 0.059 0.059 4 0.236 0.012 5916 0.494 YES - reaK r iow measures at t5wommgion L.S. ivo. i u for service Area A; rarKlawn Avenue at UaklaWn Avenue cutoff for Service Area B; and Edina L.S. No. 22 for Service Area C. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 56 of 115 Impacts of Development Scenario 4: The redevelopment under this scenario would consist of a mix of commercial office space, retail, warehousing, and would maximize the potential number of multi - family residential units. The office space and warehousing sanitary sewer loading is calculated the same as the previous scenarios. For all residential units, an average daily wastewater flow of 274 gpd per unit will be used. Peaking factors recommended by the MCES based on average daily flows vary from 3.4 to 4.0 were used to determine the peak hour flow. Future wastewater flow for the Gateway Study Area under Scenario 4 is shown below in Table 18 -13. Table 18 -14 summarizes the estimated wastewater characteristics and loading for the wastewater that will be generated under Scenario 4. Cable 18 -13. Estimated Average Day and Peak Hour Wastewater Flow from Scen Estimated Wastewater Characteristics and Average Day Loading Increase Over Existing Loads Gross Ibs /da Total Biochemical Oxygen Demand Metro 220 Square Equivalent Average Peak Hour Type Service Footage Residential Daily Wastewater Seneca Area (Non- Units Wastewater Flow (MGD) 36 12 Res.) 117 Flow Total Phosphorous Metro 8 12 4 MGD 37 30 A 1,341,000 559 0.153 0.520 Commercial Office & B 545,000 227 0.062 0.248 Warehousing C 519,000 216 0.059 0.236 A - 1,433 0.393 1.336 Onsite B - 100 0.027 0.108 Residential C - - - - Total 2,405,000 2,535 0.694 2.448 Table 18 -14. Estimated Wastewater Characteristics and Total Average Daily Wastewater Loading from Development Scenario 4 ario 4 Parameter WWTP Estimated Wastewater Characteristics and Average Day Loading Increase Over Existing Loads mil Ibs /da Ibs /da Biochemical Oxygen Demand Metro 220 315 99 Seneca 1,018 829 Total Suspended Solids Metro 220 315 99 Seneca 1,018 829 Ammonia - Nitrogen Metro 25 36 12 Seneca 117 95 Total Phosphorous Metro 8 12 4 Seneca 37 30 City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 57 of 115 Under this scenario approximately 76 percent (1.856 MGD) of the peak flow generated from the Gateway Study Area will be diverted south through the MCES BN -499 Interceptor sewer (Sanitary Service Area A). Approximately 14 percent (0.356 MGD) of the peak flow generated will be directed north along Parklawn Avenue to Lift Station No. 6 (Sanitary Service Area B). The remaining 10 percent (0.236 MGD) of the peak flow discharges across France Avenue to Lift Station No. 22 (Sanitary Service Area C). Table 18 -15 provides a breakdown of the sanitary sewer capacity analysis for each sanitary service area under Scenario 4. Based on this analysis, it is evident that potential redevelopment that occurs within Sanitary Service Area A may lead to downstream sanitary capacity issues, mainly at the MCES Bloomington Lift Station No. 10, and will warrant the upsizing of the 9 -inch sanitary sewer along Computer Avenue to an 18 -inch sanitary sewer. The threshold sanitary sewer flow that can be added to the Gateway Study Area without any sanitary sewer improvements, based on capacity, is the same as the previous three scenarios, and is approximately 125 SAC units, which translate to approximately 300,000 gsf of additional office, warehousing, or industrial redevelopment in this portion of the Gateway Study Area. This value is based on the existing capacity of Lift Station No. 10. Additional redevelopment exceeding 270 SAC units, which translate to approximately 648,000 gsf of office, warehousing or industrial redevelopment that directs flow to Computer Avenue, would warrant the upsizing of the 9 -inch sanitary sewer along Computer Avenue. The addition of any flow will further increase the insufficient capacity issues of the MCES interceptor along West 84`h Street until capacity improvements can be accomplished by the MCES and Bloomington. Sanitary sewer within Sanitary Service Area B and C is adequately sized to handle the increase in flows that are proposed under Scenario 3. Downstream upgrades to Edina Lift Stations No. 6 and No. 22 which are part of the City's Capital Improvement Program can adequately handle the increase in flows as a result of redevelopment. The same holds true for Edina's downstream trunk sanitary sewer and the MCES Richfield -491 interceptor serving these areas. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 58 of 115 Table 18 -15: Sewer Capacity Analysis for Scenario 4 * Peak Flow measured at Bloomington L.S. No. 10 for Service Area A; Parklawn Avenue at Oaklawn Avenue cutoff for Service Area B; and Edina L.S. No. 22 for Service Area C. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 59 of 115 Existing Proposed Gateway Gateway Flow Direction & Service Area Existing Downstream Study Area Existing Combined Flows Study Area Proposed Combined Flows Downstream Capacity (MGD) Adequate Sizing Average Flow (MGD) Average Flow (MGD) Total Average Flow (MGD) Peak Flow Factor Total Peak Flow (MGD) Average Flow (MGD) Total Average Flow (MGD) Peak Flow Factor Total Peak Flow (MGD)- Increase in Peak Flow (MGD)' Percent Change in Flow* A Commercial 0.130 0.091 0.221 1 0.153 0.283 Residential 0.010 0.010 0.393 0.393 1.008 NO Total 0.130 0.101 0.231 1 3.8 1 0.878 0.546 0.676 1 3.3 1 2.231 1.353 1 154% B Commercial 0'161 0.067 0.228 1 1 0.062 0.223 Residential 0.000 0.000 0.027 0.027 Total 0.161 0.067 0.228 1 3.8 1 0.866 0.089 0.250 1 3.7 0.925 1 0.059 7% 1.616 YES C Commercial 0.000 0.056 0.056 0.059 0.059 Residential 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Total 0.000 0.056 0.056 4 0.224_L 0.059 0.059 4 0.236 0.012 5% 0.494 YES * Peak Flow measured at Bloomington L.S. No. 10 for Service Area A; Parklawn Avenue at Oaklawn Avenue cutoff for Service Area B; and Edina L.S. No. 22 for Service Area C. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 59 of 115 Water Ouality - Wastewater Mitigation Plan • Any redevelopment activities that may increase the total sanitary sewer flows within Service Area A beyond threshold limits for peak capacity will require upgraded facilities within the Gateway Study Area (Computer Avenue sanitary sewer) and Bloomington (MCES Bloomington Lift Station No. 10) to accommodate increased flows. • Edina, Bloomington, and Metropolitan Council Environmental Services will continue discussions and analysis regarding proposed capacity upgrades to Bloomington Lift Station No. 10 and the MCES BN -499 Interceptor along West 84th Street in Bloomington. • Edina will complete its update to their Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan. • Edina will upgrade Lift Station No. 22. • In conjunction with redevelopment activities; Edina will determine the condition of the existing sanitary sewer pipe within the Gateway Study Area to determine if repairs or replacement is necessary based on in -place pipe condition and infiltration potential.. 19. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS AND SOIL CONDITIONS a. Approximate depth (in feet) to groundwater: 6 minimum; 10 average Approximate depth (in feet) to bedrock: 120 minimum; 125 average b. Describe any of the following geologic site hazards to ground water and also identify them on the site map: sinkholes, shallow limestone formations or karst conditions. Describe measures to avoid or minimize environmental problems due to any of these hazards. c. Describe the soils on the site, giving NRCS (SCS) classifications, if known. Discuss soil granularity and potential for groundwater contamination from wastes or chemicals spread or spilled onto the soils. Discuss any mitigation measures to prevent such contamination. For purposes of the geologic hazard analysis in this AUAR, the responses to Items 19a -c are included together in this section. Existing Conditions No limestone, sinkholes or karst conditions are known within the Gateway Study Area. The soils within the Gateway Study Area consist mainly of loamy sands, silts, clays, and peat underlain with an undetermined thickness of sand and silty sand. One location in the northwest corner of the Gateway Study Area has a hydrologic soils group classification of A. The overall low infiltration rates can result in increased runoff from the Study Area. Table 19 -1 lists the soils present in the Study Area and Figure 19 -1 shows the location of these soils. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 64 of 115 Limited soil boring data is available within the Gateway Study Area at the locations of the Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quads site. Based on this information, there is organic and alluvial material underlying the existing fill that was placed for the existing development. The surficial groundwater in the area is very high in this area and was encountered between six to 14 feet below the surface. It is anticipated that this is typical for the entire Gateway Study Area. The Hennepin County Geologic Atlas indicates the bedrock for the majority of the Study Area is between 120 -125 feet below the surface. The sensitivity to groundwater contamination within the area is very high, meaning the estimated travel time for water -borne surface contaminants to reach the aquifer is days to weeks. Table 19 -1. Soils within the Study Area Map Symbol Map Unit Hydrologic Hydric Name Group U 1 A Urban - B Yes Udorthents U4A Urban - A Yes Udi samments L50A Houghton & A/D Yes Muskego L55B Urban - N/A Yes Malardi Impact of Development Scenarios 1 through 4 The proposed land use within the Study Area is anticipated to be office, commercial, light industrial with the potential for high- density residential redevelopment in Scenarios 2 and 4. These types of land uses are not anticipated to present a hazard to groundwater contamination since contaminants are generally not expected to be present within the area. Based on the proposed land use, the potential for groundwater contamination should be no greater than the potential that exists with the existing fully- developed commercial and warehousing land use. During construction, temporary dewatering is anticipated to be needed to install building footings and connect municipal services. As part of construction, project proposers will need to identify suitable routes for the dewatering discharge. Temporary dewatering must also incorporate erosion and sedimentation control Best Management Practices to avoid impacting water quality downstream of local ponds or of Nine Mile Creek. Redevelopment within the Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quads site is anticipated to use underground parking. It is anticipated that this underground parking will require permanent dewatering operations. This activity will require approval from the DNR and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District as well as a dewatering plan to identify quantities and route of discharge as this activity has the potential to impact downstream water resources with additional volume loading as well as impact the water level of adjacent ponds by lowering the water table. Lowering the water table also has the potential to cause subsidence of the underlying organic material in the area if the organic material dries out. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 65 of 115 Geologic Hazards and Soil Conditions Mitigation Plan • The NPDES Phase II Construction Site permit requires a site specific Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to be completed for the construction by the project proposer. This S WPPP is required to include pollution prevention management measures for solid waste and hazardous material spills that occur during construction. • Mitigation includes conformance with the Edina spill response plan. Spills will be reported to the fire chief and/or applicable City Staff. The fire chief and/or applicable City Staff will in turn notify any other appropriate officials depending on the nature of the spill. • Project proposer(s) will be required to develop a temporary dewatering plan for construction activities, review this plan with Edina and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District for approval, and conform to the dewatering requirements of the DNR and NPDES Construction permit. • If a redevelopment project involves permanent dewatering for underground facilities, a detailed dewatering plan is required to be developed by the project proposer. This plan would include anticipated dewatering amounts, direction of discharge, analysis of impact on adjacent ponds and downstream receiving waters, and impact on the organic material within the Study Area for the potential for subsidence. The plan will need to be submitted to Edina, Nine Mile Creek Watershed District, and DNR for review and/or approval. 20. SOLID WASTES, HAZARDOUS WASTES, AND STORAGE TANKS a. Describe types, amounts and compositions of solid or hazardous wastes, including solid animal manure, sludge and ash, produced during construction and operation. Identify method and location of disposal. For projects generating municipal solid waste, indicate if there is a source separation plan; describe how the project will be modified for recycling. If hazardous waste is generated, indicate if there is a hazardous waste minimization plan and routine hazardous waste reduction assessments. No hazardous wastes are anticipated to be produced by the redevelopment scenarios. Municipal solid waste will be hauled away by the municipal garbage service and residents and businesses will be encouraged to recycle. Table 20 -1 outlines estimated quantities of municipal solid waste for each scenario. These numbers were developed based on information from the Environmental Protection Agency (1999). Based on the Environmental Protection Agency, one person generates approximately 4.9 pounds of solid municipal waste per day. This number is an aggregate number that takes into account commercial and business use. For the purposes of generating solid waste numbers only, it was assumed 2.3 persons per household for the residential use, 1.3 people per 1,000 square feet for light industrial uses, and 3.3 people per 1,000 square feet of commercial uses were present. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 66 of 115 Table 20 -1. Estimated auantities of municipal solid waste generated annually. b. Identify any toxic or hazardous materials to be used or present at the site and identify measures to be used to prevent them from contaminating groundwater. If the use of toxic or hazardous materials will lead to a regulated waste, discharge or emission, discuss any alternatives considered to minimize or eliminate the waste, discharge or emission. Due to the age of the existing buildings within the Gateway Study Area, asbestos may be contained in insulation and construction materials that were used in the construction of these buildings. An asbestos survey performed in 2006 by the Developer revealed asbestos containing components in some of the buildings located within the Gateway Study Area. During redevelopment, the only hazardous material anticipated to be present in the Gateway Study Area would be the fuel and oil used by construction equipment during construction activities. The management, containment, and clean up of any spills that may occur within a construction site during construction will be addressed under the MPCA NPDES /SDS Storm Water Construction Permit and its accompanying Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan preparation. A copy of this plan is required on -site during construction and utilized in the event that a spill or discharge may occur. Post - construction land use would include primarily commercial office space, light industrial space, or residential units and is not anticipated to generate toxic materials. c. Indicate the number, location, size and use of any above or below ground tanks to store petroleum products or other materials, except water. - Describe any emergency response containment plans. Existing tank locations are discussed in Item 9. The proposed commercial areas have the potential for a neighborhood convenience store and gas station to be constructed. A gas station would have underground petroleum tanks. This type of development would be required to adhere to State regulations for containment of underground petroleum tanks and an annual license would be needed. Solid Waste, Hazardous Waste, and Storage Tanks Mitigation Plan City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 67 of 115 Existing Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 Conditions Solid Waste 7,848,652 12,372,484 18,549,605 22,495,036 15,878,797 Generated lbs lbs lbs lbs lbs b. Identify any toxic or hazardous materials to be used or present at the site and identify measures to be used to prevent them from contaminating groundwater. If the use of toxic or hazardous materials will lead to a regulated waste, discharge or emission, discuss any alternatives considered to minimize or eliminate the waste, discharge or emission. Due to the age of the existing buildings within the Gateway Study Area, asbestos may be contained in insulation and construction materials that were used in the construction of these buildings. An asbestos survey performed in 2006 by the Developer revealed asbestos containing components in some of the buildings located within the Gateway Study Area. During redevelopment, the only hazardous material anticipated to be present in the Gateway Study Area would be the fuel and oil used by construction equipment during construction activities. The management, containment, and clean up of any spills that may occur within a construction site during construction will be addressed under the MPCA NPDES /SDS Storm Water Construction Permit and its accompanying Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan preparation. A copy of this plan is required on -site during construction and utilized in the event that a spill or discharge may occur. Post - construction land use would include primarily commercial office space, light industrial space, or residential units and is not anticipated to generate toxic materials. c. Indicate the number, location, size and use of any above or below ground tanks to store petroleum products or other materials, except water. - Describe any emergency response containment plans. Existing tank locations are discussed in Item 9. The proposed commercial areas have the potential for a neighborhood convenience store and gas station to be constructed. A gas station would have underground petroleum tanks. This type of development would be required to adhere to State regulations for containment of underground petroleum tanks and an annual license would be needed. Solid Waste, Hazardous Waste, and Storage Tanks Mitigation Plan City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 67 of 115 • Municipal waste hauler companies will make residential and commercial recycling programs available to the Study Area. General municipal waste will be removed by these waste hauler companies. • Prior to demolition an asbestos survey shall be completed by a project proposer. At the time of demolition, any necessary asbestos abatement will need to be completed by the project proposer in compliance with MPCA requirements. • The management, containment, and clean up of any spills that may occur within the Study Area during construction will be addressed by the permit holders of the MPCA NPDES /SDS Storm Water Construction Permit and its accompanying Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan preparation. • If a neighborhood convenience store and gas station is proposed, the project proposer will be required to adhere to State regulations for containment of underground petroleum tanks and an annual license would be needed. 21. Traffic. Parking spaces added Not Necessary for AUAR . Existing spaces (if project involves expansion) NA . Estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated (if known) and time of occurrence See Appendix A Provide an estimate of the impact on traffic congestion on affected roads and describe any traffic improvements necessary. If the project is within the Twin Cities metropolitan area, discuss its impact on the regional transportation system. A. Method of Analysis The traffic operations analysis is derived from established methodologies documented in the Highway Capacity Manual (TRB, 2000). The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) provides a series of analysis techniques that are used to evaluate traffic operations for roadway segments, intersections, and freeway ramps by using roadway geometry, traffic control, and traffic volumes. Multiple steps are required when completing traffic analysis. First key roadways and intersections are selected. Typically these key locations are selected because they are anticipated to provide development access to the metropolitan roadway network. Traffic analysis is typically reported for existing and future/build conditions. Existing traffic conditions, such as traffic volumes, lane geometry, and signal timing are collected and put in a traffic model. The model is calibrated to replicate existing conditions. Existing conditions provide a baseline at which to compare future conditions. Future conditions are analyzed using future traffic projections. Developing traffic projections includes trip generation, trip distribution, and trip assignment. Trip generation estimates the number of trips the proposed land use will produce. A vehicle trip only includes a vehicle that is City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 68 of 115 entering or exiting a site. So a person who travels to work within a site would generate two trips; one when they go to work and one when they leave work. Trip distribution includes reviewing existing and future anticipated travel patterns to determine how motorists will access the metropolitan roadway network. Trip assignment then assigns the trips to the network using projected trip distribution. For purposes of this study, trips for other approved developments were also applied to projected roadway and intersection traffic volumes. Background growth was added to the future volumes to account for traffic that is using the roadway, but is not redevelopment related. The future traffic projections are entered into the traffic model to determine future deficiencies. Strategies are then developed to mitigate the deficiencies. The HCM analysis typically provides results in the form of a letter grade from A to F, otherwise called level of service (LOS). The letter is meant give a qualitative estimate of the operational efficiency or effectiveness. The system is set up similar to a report card, with A representing high quality operations and F representing poor operations. At LOS A, motorists experience very little delay or interference. On a roadway or intersection with LOS F conditions, motorists would experience extreme delay or severe congestion. Although LOS A conditions represent the best possible level of traffic flow, the cost to construct roadways and intersections to such high standards exceeds the benefit to the user. Therefore, Edina has an overall goal to provide its residents with conditions at LOS D or better. Operations at LOS E are acceptable for individual movements. The analysis techniques defined in the HCM is different for roadways and intersections. Roadway segment analysis focuses on the average daily volume to capacity ratio, while intersection analysis focuses on delay caused by the peak hour critical movements. It is therefore possible to have an efficient intersection located along a poorly operating roadway segment, or a poorly operating intersection along an otherwise free - flowing arterial. For intersections, LOS is primarily a function of a.m. and p.m. peak hour turning movement volumes, intersection lane configuration, and traffic control. The intersection analysis was completed using average control delay as defined by the HCM. LOS for signalized intersections is shown on Table 21 -1. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 69 of 115 Table 21 -1. Signalized Intersection Level of Service Measures Level of Service Delay (sec /veh) . A <10 B 10 -20 C 20 -35 D 35 -55 E 55 -80 F 80< Source: Tables 16 -2, Highway Capacity Manual (2000) The HCM divides the freeway system into three different classifications for analysis; basic freeway segments, freeway weaving segments, and ramps and ramp junctions. For purposes of this study, the ability to get vehicles on and off of the interstate system is a priority and therefore analysis included weaving segments and ramps that interact with the freeway. Level of service for weave and ramp analysis is defined in terms of density or the passenger car per mile per lane (pc /mi/ln). Weaving segments are formed when an on -ramp is closely followed by an off -ramp and the two are joined by an auxiliary lane. The HCM defines this length at less than 2,500 feet. Weaving segments require intense lane- changing maneuvers as drivers must access lanes appropriate to their desired exit points. The HCM defines three major categories of weaving configurations: Type A, Type B, and Type C. • Type A - Weaving vehicles in both directions must make one lane change to successfully complete a weaving maneuver. • Type B - Weaving vehicles in one direction may complete a weaving maneuver without making a lane change, whereas other vehicles in the weaving segment must make one lane change to successfully complete a weaving maneuver. • Type C - Weaving vehicles in one direction may complete a weaving maneuver without making a lane change, whereas other vehicles in the weaving segment must make two or more lane changes to successfully complete a weaving maneuver. Level of service measures for freeway weaving are defined in Table 21 -2. When a ramp does not meet the definition to be considered a weaving segment, ramp merge and diverge influence areas are evaluated separately. A merge occurs at on on -ramp when vehicles attempt to find gaps on the freeway. A diverge occurs at off -ramps when vehicles attempt to exit the freeway. Studies have shown that the influence areas for a merge and diverge sections extend City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 70 of 115 1,500 feet downstream or upstream of the ramp. Level of service measures for freeway ramps are defined in Table 21 -2. The weave and ramp analysis will flag areas where mitigation is needed. However, the disadvantage of this type of analysis is that it does not take into account the effects of delay at other interchanges or bottlenecks within the interstate network. To complete this type of analysis, a simulation model of the interstate system would be required. Table 21 -2. Freeway Level of Service Measures Level of Service Densi Omi/lfi A <10 B 10 -20 C 20 -28 D 28 -35 E >35 F 43< Source: Tables 24 -2, Highway Capacity Manual (2000) B. Existing Conditions In order to evaluate the existing conditions, key roadway segments and intersections were selected that are expected to provide the primary access to the regional roadway system when the Study Area redevelops. This section documents the geometry, traffic volumes, and functional class at these locations, and uses these traffic characteristics to estimate their existing traffic operations. (1) Key Roadways The following eight roadways were selected as the key roadway segments for the Study Area: • East Bush Lake Road between American Boulevard and West 78th Street • Edina Industrial Boulevard from West 78th Street to Metro Avenue • Edina Industrial Boulevard/West 77th Street from Metro Avenue to Computer Avenue • West 77th Street from Computer Avenue to Parklawn Avenue • Minnesota Drive from West 77th Street to France Avenue • Parklawn Avenue/West 76th Street from West 77th Street to France Avenue • France Avenue from West 76th Street to Minnesota Drive • France Avenue from Minnesota Drive to Westbound I -494 Exit Ramp City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 71 of 115 The transportation characteristics for the roadways are displayed in Table 21 -3. The existing roadway segment is documented, along with the existing functional classification. Also displayed are average annual daily traffic (AADT) volumes were obtained from Year 2005 Mn/DOT Traffic Flow Maps. Table 21 -3. Characteristics of Key Roadways _,$n ^ T c ... �, �'§ ✓: t 61ktional «y T 0 4 -205 _ ..Segment" ..Se Lation oc :Classification. .Eacrl> a AADT East Bush Lake American Boulevard and West A Minor Arterial - Four -Lane with Road 78th Street Reliever Turn Lanes 12,400 Edina Industrial West 78th Street to Metro A Minor Arterial - Boulevard Boulevard Reliever Four -Lane 9,000 Edina Industrial ' Metro Boulevard to Computer A Minor Arterial - Four -Lane with Boulevard /West 91900 77th Street Avenue Reliever Turn Lanes Computer Avenue to Parklawn A Minor Arterial - Four -Lane with West 77th Street 12,500 Avenue Reliever Center Turn Lane Parklawn West 77th Street to France A Minor Arterial - Avenue /West 76th Four -Lane 9,100 Avenue Reliever Street Minnesota Drive West 77th Street to France B Minor Collector Four -Lane with 5,800 Avenue Turn Lanes West 76th Street to Minnesota A Minor Arterial - Seven -Lane with France Avenue 28,700 Drive Reliever Turn Lanes Minnesota Drive to A Minor Arterial - Six -Lane with Turn France Avenue Westbound Interstate 494 Exit 28,700 Reliever Lanes Ram KA01686- 04 \TrafficUAS Seg.xb Source: 2005 Mn/DOT Traffic Flow Maps and 1999 Edina Comprehensive Plan (2) Key Intersections The following fifteen intersections, displayed on Figure 21 -1 in Appendix A, were selected because they provide primary access to the regional roadway system from the Study Area: • France Avenue / West 76th Street • Edina Industrial Blvd / West 78th Street • Edina Industrial Blvd / Metro Boulevard • Southbound TH 100 / West 77th Street • Northbound TH 100 / West 77th Street • Commercial Access / West 77th Street City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 72 of 115 • Computer Avenue / West 77th Street • Parklawn Avenue / West 77th Street • West 77th Street / Minnesota Drive / Johnson Avenue • France Avenue / Minnesota Drive • Westbound I -494 / East Bush Lake Road • Eastbound I -494 / East Bush Lake Road • American Boulevard / East Bush Lake Road • France Avenue /West 78th Street / Westbound I -494 Off Ramp • France Avenue / Eastbound I -494 Off Ramp The vast majority of traffic exiting and entering the Study Area would have to use at least one of these intersections. The a.m. and p.m. peak hour turn movements, lane geometry, and traffic control are displayed on Figure 21 -2 and 21 -3 in Appendix A. Turning movements were taken in January-May of 2007. All analyzed intersections are controlled by traffic signals. For purposed of analysis, traffic signal timing was obtained from Mn/DOT, Hennepin County, and Edina. (3) Freeway Weaving and Ramp Junctions The following weave segments and ramp junctions were selected for analysis: • I -494 Eastbound - Diverge to East Bush Lake Road Exit - Weave between East Bush Lake Road and TH 100 - Diverge to France Avenue - Merge from France Avenue • I -494 Westbound - Diverge to France Avenue - Merge from France Avenue - Weave between TH 100 and East Bush Lake Road • TH 100 Northbound - Weave between I -494 and West 77`h Street - Weave between West 77`h Street and West 70`h Street • TH 100 Southbound - Weave between West 70`h Street and West 77`h Street - Weave between West 77`h Street and I -494 The following loops were selected for analysis (as specified by Mn/DOT): • I -494 at France Avenue - Southbound loop between France Avenue and eastbound I -494 • I -494 at TH 100 - Southbound TH 100 loop to eastbound I -494 Traffic volumes obtained from Mn/DOT on I -494 and TH 100 and their ramps were taken in April 2007. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 73 of 115 (4) Existing Land Use The existing land use consists mostly of office and office /warehouse uses. A more detailed description of the existing Gateway Study Area can be found in Section 6A. Currently about 1,904,000 gsf of building space is available within the Study Area, of which about 223,500 gsf of office space is unoccupied. Building areas were measured from aerial photographs. The amount of unoccupied space was provided by Wayzata Properties. The estimated trip generation is calculated in Table 21 -4. The Pentagon Development areas are described in more detail in Section 5 and on Figure 5 -3. As shown, the Study Area is currently generating about 16,900 vehicle trips per day (vpd). When the office space is fully occupied, the Gateway Study Area has the potential to generate 19,400 vpd. The analyzed interchanges also act as the access for the area south of the Study Area. The area bounded by TH 100 to the west, France Avenue to the east, I -494 to the south, and Gateway Study Area to the north generates an additional 24,100 vpd when fully occupied. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 74 of 115 Table 21 -4. Existing Trip Generation Develo mint Site Occu anc Time of Da Trip 'Rate Tri .Generation . Total In Out %' Trips % Trips. Pentagon Tower 142,876 gsf 69.3% Daily 11.01 1,090 50 545 50 545 AM Peak Hour 1.55 153 88 135 12 18 PM Peak Hour 1.49 147 17 25 83 122 Pentagon Quads 355,054 gsf 60.0% Daily 11.01 2,347 50 1,174 50 1,173 AM Peak Hour 1.55 330 88 290 12 40 PM Peak Hour 1.49 318 17 54 83 264 Pentagon East 136,611 gsf 91.2% Daily 11.01 1,371 50 686 50 685 AM Peak Hour 1.55 193 88 170 12 23 PM Peak Hour 1.49 186 17 32 .83 154 Pentagon Tower SE 25,620 gsf 0.0% Daily 11.01 0 50 0 50 0 AM Peak Hour 1.55 0 88 0 12 0 PM Peak Hour 1.49 0 17 0 83 0 Other Office 992,700 gsf 100.0% Daily 11.01 10,930 50 5,465 50 5,465 AM Peak Hour 1.55 1,539 88 1,354 12 185 PM Peak Hour 1.49 1,479 17 251 83 1,228 Other Office 1 Warehousing 207,000 gsf 100.0% Daily 4.96 1,027 50 514 50 513 AM Peak Hour 0.57 118 59 70 41 48 PM Peak Hour 0.61 126 8 10 92 116 Other Mini Storage 45,000 gsf 100.0% Daily 2.5 113 50 57 50 56 AM Peak Hour 0.28 13 48 6 52 7 PM Peak Hour 0:29 13 53 7 47 6 Total Daily 16,878 8,441 8,437 AM Peak Hour 2,346 2,025 321 PM Peak Hour 2,269 379 1,890 Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual (76' Edition) and WSB & Associates, Inc. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 75 of 115 (5) Existing Operations Analysis Traffic operations were evaluated for the existing key roadway segments and intersections listed above. This section describes the methodology used to assess the operations and provides a summary of how traffic is operating today. The existing intersection operations were evaluated using Synchro and SimTraffic for the a.m. and p.m. peak hour. The results of this analysis are illustrated in Table 21 -5. During the p.m. peak hour, Edina Industrial Boulevard/Metro Boulevard and France Avenue /Minnesota Drive are deficient at LOS E. At both intersections, vehicles are trying to access the interstate system and queue lengths are deficient. On France Avenue, vehicles are queuing between intersections. Existing freeway operations were evaluated using worksheets from the HCM. The results of this analysis are shown in Table 21 -6. Analysis worksheets are available upon request. The entrance ramp from France Avenue onto westbound I -494 is deficient operating at LOS F during the p.m. peak hour. Other ramps are not deficient; however, many of the ramps are operating at LOS D during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 76 of 115 Table 21 -5 Existing (2007) Intersection Level of Service Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Note: Based upon criteria shown in Table 21 -2 City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 77 of 115 ;_. 2007: AM Peak. Hour ; PM Peak Hour -Traffic `LOS' Delay' 'Notes ' LOS' Delay, " ' 'Notes Intersection "`Control NBL at LOS E with France Ave / Traffic C 30.9 delay at 75.6 C 32.2 W 76th St Signal sec /veh Edina Ind Blvd / Traffic C 27.8 C 29.7 W 78th St Signal SBL and EBL at Edina Ind Blvd / Traffic B 11.5 "E •' 71.3 LOS F with delay Metro Blvd Signal over 100 sec /veh SB TH 100 / Traffic EBT at LOS F with C 26.3 D 48.2 W 77th St Signal delay at 92.1 sec /veh NB TH 100 / Traffic EBL at LOS F with C 22.1 D 50.6 W 77th St Signal delay at 84.3 sec /veh Commercial Access / Traffic A 5.0 C 26.6 W 77th St Signal Computer Ave / Traffic C 20.6 C 23.4 W 77th Signal Parklawn Ave / Traffic C 20.9 C 32.4 W 77th St Signal W 77th St / Traffic B 11.7 C 29.5 Minnesota Dr Signal WBL at LOS F with France Ave / Traffic C 25.2 :; ,tE:' ':': 67.6 delay over 100 Minnesota Dr Signal sec /veh WB 1494 / Traffic B 16.5 B 11.2 E Bush Lake . Signal EB I494 / Traffic B 14.6 C 22.2 E Bush Lake Signal American Blvd / Traffic B 13.5 A 9.6 E Bush Lake Signal France Ave / NBL at LOS E with EBL at LOS F with Traffic W 78th St -WB I-494 Off C 24.7 delay at 64.4 D 44.0 delay over 100 Ramp Signal sec /veh sec /veh France Ave / Traffic C 21.3 B 17.7 EB 1 -494 Off Ramp Signal Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Note: Based upon criteria shown in Table 21 -2 City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 77 of 115 Table 21 -6. Existing (2007) Freeway Level of Service K:\ 01686-04 \Tmffie\Freew y\Freeway Volumes.xls Source: Year 2007 Mn/DOT Traffic Counts and WSB & Associates; Inc. Note: Based upon criteria shown in Table 21 -3 and Table 21 -4 C. Impacts of Redevelopment Scenarios (1) Future Traffic Forecasts The purpose of this section is to identify the traffic impacts associated with the future redevelopment within the Study Area. Four potential land use scenarios were evaluated. More detailed descriptions of these scenarios can be viewed in Section 6A and on Figures 6- 1 to 6 -4. Trips for each of the scenarios were generated and distributed on the regional system and analyzed for years 2014 and 2030. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 78 of 115 2007 .A.M. Peak Hour - P.M..Peak Hour. Merge or Ramp Junction Location LOS Density' .:LOS ' Density, Diverge to East Bush Lake Road Exit B 17.0 B 12.0 b 'o Weave between East Bush Lake Road and TH 100 D 32.6 C 24.2 w v Diverge to France Avenue C 26.0 B 18.0 Merge from France Avenue D 32.0 D 31.0 n Diverge to France Avenue D 30.0 D 29.0 c a 0 3 Merge from France Avenue D 31.0 E' - 36.0 c rn Weave between TH 100 and East Bush Lake Road D 29.0 D 34.6 n Weave between I -494 and West 77th °c c Street C 22.7 C 21.6 x E" o Weave between West 77th Street and Z West 70th Street B 19.2 D 29.3 Weave between West 70th Street and c West 77th Street B 11.2 B 15.9 c o -. 0 Ex- c Weave between West 77th Street and I-494 B 10.4 C 21.2 K:\ 01686-04 \Tmffie\Freew y\Freeway Volumes.xls Source: Year 2007 Mn/DOT Traffic Counts and WSB & Associates; Inc. Note: Based upon criteria shown in Table 21 -3 and Table 21 -4 C. Impacts of Redevelopment Scenarios (1) Future Traffic Forecasts The purpose of this section is to identify the traffic impacts associated with the future redevelopment within the Study Area. Four potential land use scenarios were evaluated. More detailed descriptions of these scenarios can be viewed in Section 6A and on Figures 6- 1 to 6 -4. Trips for each of the scenarios were generated and distributed on the regional system and analyzed for years 2014 and 2030. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 78 of 115 (a) Trip Generation In order to estimate the traffic generated by the Study Area, land use assumptions were applied to trip generation rates from the ITE Trip Generation Manual (7h Edition) as illustrated in Tables 21 -10 to 21 -13. All of the proposed scenarios replace existing office space. Trips generated from the existing buildings were shown previously in Table 21 -4. These trips were removed from the network before applying the new land uses. It should be noted only the portion of space that is currently occupied was taken into consideration. Additionally, trips generated as a part of The Burgundy development (within the Gateway Study Area) are not included in this total since they will be added to the existing turning movements with the other previously approved developments. The Burgundy redevelopment is anticipated to generate 2,260 trips per day, with 88 trips and 95 trips during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, respectively. Scenario 1 consists of office and office /warehouse land uses. This scenario is taken from the Edina Comprehensive Plan. The plan will generate about 24,000 vpd. The net increase equates to 7,100 vpd with about 900 trips during each of the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Scenario 2 adds residential, retail, and a hotel, increasing the production to about 35,600 vpd. However, the proposed retail will be developed to serve the residential. To account for trips traveling from the residential to the retail, internal trips were taken into account. Using estimates from the manual, about 2,200 trips were considered internal and removed from the net. The net increase in vehicle trips is 16,500 vpd with 1,700 during each of the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Scenario 3 produces the largest number of trips, at about 42,900 trips per day due to the large amount of office space. The net increase is 26,000 vpd with about 3,500 trips during each of the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. Scenario 4 includes office, office /warehousing, and residential uses creating 26,900 trips per day. For reasons described above under Scenario 2, about 160 internal trips were removed. The net increase in vehicle trips is 9,800 vpd with 700 and 800 trips during the a.m. and p.m. peak hour, respectively. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 79 of 115 Table 21 -7. Estimated Trip Generation — Scenario 1 LandiUse`'. ITE Land Use:. Size :; Time of WY::Rate w 'Tri `G eneration Totals In ;' Out %" Trips % :'Taps'., Office 710 1,593;000 gsf Daily 11.01 17,539 50 8,770 50 8,769 AM Peak Hour 1.55 2,469 88 2,173 12 296 PM Peak Hour 1.49 2,374 17 404 83 1,970 Office and Warehousing 150 1,296,000 gsf Daily 4.96 6,428 50 3,214 50 3,214 AM Peak Hour 0.57 739 59 436 41 303 PM Peak Hour 0.61 791 8 63 92 728 Total Daily 23,967 11,984 11,983 AM Peak Hour 3,208 2,609 599 PM Peak Hour 3,165 467 2,698 Net Increase in Trips Daily 7,089 3,543 3,546 AM Peak Hour 862 584 278 F PM Peak Hour 896 88 808 Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual (7h Edition) and WSB & Associates, Inc. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 80 of 115 Table 21 -8. Estimated Trip Generation - Scenario 2 Land Use ITE Land Use 'Size - Time of Da Trip, Rate .. Trip Generation' Total' In ,Out '- ' '% . Trips % Trips Office 710 1,908,000 gsf Daily 11.01 21,007 50 10,504 50 10,503 AM Peak Hour 1.55 2,957 88 2,602 12 355 PM Peak Hour 1.49 2,843 17 483 83 2,360 Office and Warehousing 150 1,296,000 gsf Daily 4.96 6,428 50 3,214 50 3,214 AM Peak Hour 0.57 739 59 436 41 303 PM Peak Hour 0.61 791 8 63 92 728 Retail 814 80,000 gsf Daily 44.32 3,546 50 1,773 50 1,773 AM Peak Hour 6.84 547 48 263 52 284 PM Peak Hour 5.02 402 56 225 44 177 Hotel 310 150 rooms Daily 8.17 1,226 50 613 50 613 AM Peak Hour 0.52 78 55 43 45 35 - PM Peak Hour 0.61 92 58 53 42 39 Condominium /Townhome 230 205 units Daily 5.86 1,201 50 601 50 600 AM Peak Hour 0.44 90 18 16 82 74 PM Peak Hour 0.52 107 64 68 36 39 Senior Adult Housing - Attached 252 615 units Daily 3.48 2,140 50 1,070 50 1,070 AM Peak Hour 0.06 37 50 19 50 18 PM Peak Hour 0.11 68 53 36 47 32 Total Daily 35,548 17,775 17,773 AM Peak Hour 4,448 3,379 1,069 PM Peak Hour 4,303 928 3,375 Internal Trips Daily -2,195 -1,097 -1,098 AM Peak Hour -419 -201 -218 PM Peak Hour -311 -173 -138 Net Increase in Trips Daily 16,475 8,237 8,238 AM Peak Hour 1,683 1,153 530 PM Peak Hour 1,723 376 1,347 Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual (7"' Edition) and WSB & Associates, Inc. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 81 of 115 Table 21 -9. Estimated Trip Generation — Scenario 3 'Land Use -` ITE s Land r Use' . Size `' �� 4, h Time.'of Da : " Trip 'SRate " ri T "Generation 4 Total In �; x Out - %o .Trips % , -;, 'Trips. Office 710 3,308;000 gsf Daily 11.01 36,421 50 18,211 50 18,210 AM Peak Hour 1.55 5,127 88 4,512 12 615 PM Peak Hour 1.49 4,929 17 838 83 4,091 Office and Warehousing 150 1,296,000 gsf Daily 4.96 6,428 50 3,214 50 3,214 AM Peak Hour 0.57 739 59 436 41 303 PM Peak Hour 0.61 791 8 63 92 728 Total Daily 42,849 21,425 21,424 AM Peak Hour 5,866 4,948 918 PM Peak Hour 5,720 901 4,819 Net Increase in Trips Daily 25,971 12,984 I2, 987 AM Peak Hour 3,520 2,923 597 PM Peak Hour 3,451 522 2,929 Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual (7a' Edition) and WSB & Associates, Inc. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 82 of 115 Table 21 -10. Estimated Trip Generation — Scenario 4 Land Use ITE . Land Use" I se` ` Size Time of Da '. Trip ']fate ` Trip Generation ;Total In :' ' NO r Trips %.: -Trips! Office 710 1,140,000 -gsf Daily 11.01 12,551 50 6,276 50 6,275 AM Peak Hour 1.55 1,767 88 1,555 12 212 PM Peak Hour 1.49 1,699 17 289 83 1,410 Office and Warehousing 150 1,296,000 gsf Daily 4.96 6,428 50 3,214 50 3,214 AM Peak Hour 0.57 739 59 436 41 303 PM Peak Hour _ 0.61 791 8 63 92 728 Condominium / Townhome 230 1,125 units Daily 5.86 6,593 50 3,297 50 3,296 AM Peak Hour 0.44 495 18 89 82 406 PM Peak Hour 0.52 585 64 374 36 211 Senior Adult Housing - Attached 252 375 units Daily 3A8 1,305 50 653 50 652 AM Peak Hour 0.06 23 50 12 50 11 PM Peak Hour 0.11 41 53 22 47 19 Total Daily 26,877 13,440 13,437 AM Peak Hour 3,024 2,092 932 PM Peak Hour 3,116 748 2,368 Internal Trips Daily -158 -79 -79 AM Peak Hour -11 -3 -8 PM Peak Hour -13 -8 -5 Net Increase in Trips Daily 9,841 4,920 4,921 AM Peak Hour 667 64 603 PM Peak Hour 834 361 473 Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual (7" Edition) and WSB & Associates, Inc. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 83 of 115 (b) Trip Distribution Figure 21 -4 in Appendix A shows the distribution of site - generated trips that would be expected to access the major roadways in the network. The distribution was developed using the 2000 Metropolitan Travel Demand Model and existing turning movement counts. Trip distribution is separated directionally and also by the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. This method takes into account differing travel patterns during different times of the day, likely due to congestion. (c) Trip AssiPnment Turning movements were estimated by applying the approach direction distribution percentages to the site - generated traffic. In addition to the site- generated traffic, an annualized growth rate of one percent was added to thru traffic on France Avenue and West 77th Street. Using the 2000 Metropolitan Travel Demand Model, it was estimated that ten percent of traffic on these roadways is through traffic. Additionally, trips were also added for nearby redevelopments that have been approved by the cities of Edina and Bloomington and are not yet completed or occupied. More details about these redevelopments are discussed in Section 29 and displayed on Figure 29 -1. Lastly, turning movements for the year 2025 condition were modified to account for Mn/DOT's future plans for I -494 and TH 100. Turning movements for year 2014 and year 2030 for all four scenarios are displayed in Figures 21 -5 to 21 -20 in Appendix A. The 2030 daily traffic volumes were estimated using a similar method to the peak hour volumes described above. The existing (2005) daily traffic volumes were taken as the base year, background traffic was added in similar to described above, and proposed Gateway Area development trips were added in assuming an average of the a.m. and p.m. peak hour distribution. Daily traffic volume forecasts are shown in Table 21 -11. (d) Forecast Trafric Operations The future traffic operations consisted of two parts. The first was an evaluation of the impact of the redevelopment on the key roadways and intersections notes above. The other analysis documents the developmental impacts to the surrounding interstate system. (i) Future Intersection Operations A summary of the expected traffic operations on the fifteen key intersections is displayed on Table 21 -12 to 21 -15. All scenarios will have operational deficiencies in years 2014 and 2030. Deficiencies include operations on France Avenue, the TH 100 interchange, and accesses to the Gateway Study Area. ' The majority of these locations do not have right or left turn lanes or the existing turn lanes do not have adequate capacity to handle the forecast traffic volumes. This is consistent with the 1999 Edina Comprehensive Plan which shows future storage space deficiencies at the TH 100 at West 77h Street. The following roadway deficiencies were noted: City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 84 of 115 For Scenarios 1 and 4: • France Avenue at West 76`h Street - inadequate capacity to handle the forecast through volumes on France Avenue. • France Avenue at West 78th Street/WB I -494 Ramp - eastbound right turn lane has a queue greater than the storage bay length, therefore blocking through lanes. • Edina Industrial Boulevard/West 78th Street at East Bush Lake Road — eastbound approach has inadequate capacity; all vehicles can not clear intersection in one cycle length. • Metro Boulevard at Edina Industrial Boulevard — southbound approach has inadequate capacity; all vehicles can not clear intersection in one cycle length. Eastbound left turning vehicles blocks the through lane traffic, currently no designated turn lane. This intersection was identified as currently deficient under the exiting conditions analysis. • Northbound TH 100 ramps at West 77th Street — westbound right turn lane has inadequate capacity, queue of vehicles backs through two intersections. For Scenario 2, the deficiencies noted above and the following additional deficiencies were noted: • Computer Avenue at West 77th St — northbound left turning traffic queue blocks through lanes. • Minnesota Drive at West 77th Street. and Johnson Avenue — southbound left turning vehicles create queue blocking previous intersection. For Scenario 3, all the previous deficiencies plus the following additional deficiencies were noted: • West 77th Street between Metro Boulevard and Parklawn Avenue - not enough through lanes to operate at an acceptable level of service. • TH 100 bridge on West 77th Street— inadequate lanes to handle left turning traffic from/to the freeway ramps. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 85 of 115 Table 21 -11. Future (2030) Daily Traffic Volumes E T�� Y �4:• } by ` x d[Q r 203.0' AADT; L_s Segments, 1.oTcahon . b Scenaruo <h� ',Scenano 2 Scenarw 3 . Scenario 4 '. East Bush Lake American Boulevard and West Road 78th Street 13,300 13,800 15,100 13,400 Edina Industrial West 78th Street to Metro Boulevard Boulevard 11,300 13,200 15,600 11,500 Edina Industrial Metro Boulevard Computer Boulevard/West 13,500 16,500 20,300 13,900 77th Street Avenue a Computer Avenue to Parklaw West 77th Street 17,100 20,700 25,700 17,500 Avenue Parklawn West 77th Street to France Avenue/West 76th Avenue 11,200 13,000 15,200 11,400 Street West 77th Street to France Minnesota Drive Avenue 8,100 10,000, 12,400 8,300 West 76th Street'to Minnesota France Avenue Drive 29,600 30,300 31,200 29,600 Minnesota Drive to France Avenue Westbound Interstate 494 Exit 30,300 31,500 33,200 30,400 Ramp I K\01686- GATrafficLLAS Seg.xls Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 86 of 115 Table 21-12. Future (2014) A.M. Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Note: Based upon criteria shown in Table 21-2 City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 87 of 115 -Traffic 1014 k-M:Peak Houro. sii" n 0,21- H6 n - -;�nK "4pps- LOS ::Delay :De :'10!0 Deliy� Ave Traffic C 34.4 NBL at LOS F D 39.5 NBL at LOS F J- E. 67.1 NBL at LOS F C 31.9 NBL at LOS F W 76th St Signal Edina Ind Blvd Traffic W 78th St Signal C 29.1 NBL at LOSE 91.4 F- +100 C 30.7 NBL at LOS F Edina Ind Blvd Traffic Metro Blvd Signal B 18.4 +100 F +100 B 12.0 SB TH 100 Traffic D 49.2 +100 ""'F +100 C 29.2 W 77th St Signal NB TH 100 Traffic D 52.2 EBT & EBR 75.1 EB Approach E:. . 76.6 EB Approach C §3.1 W 77th St Signal at LOS F LOS F LOS F Commercial Access Traffic W 77th St Signal A 8.6 B 12.9 A 9.6 A 8.4 Computer Ave / Traffic W 77th Signal C 21.0 C 26.7 C 20.6 C 23.3 Parklawn Ave / Traffic C 24.2 WBT & SBL C 31.3 WBT & SBL F-. +100 C 24.6 W 77th St Signal at LOS E at LOS E W 77th St Traffic Minnesota or Signal A 9.3 A 9.2 A 8.2 B 11.5 France Ave / Traffic C 32.4 SBL, EBL, & WBL at LOSE D 47.7 SBL, SBT at LOSE D 42.1 C 34.9 SBL, EBL, & WBL at LOS E Minnesota or Signal NBL at LOS F NBL,WBL & SBL at LOS F NBL at LOS F WB 1494 Traffic E Bush Lake signal B 15.3 "j .100 'F +100 B 15 EB 1494 Traffic E Bush Lake Signal B 14.8 C 33.5 NBT at LOS E D 53.6 N13T at LOS F B 15 American Blvd Traffic E Bush Lake Signal B 12.2 C 28.1 SBL at LOS E e ;' E 60.6 NBT at LOS F B 11.9 NBT at LOS F France Ave Traffic EBL, WBI, WBT, & NBL EB Approach & W 78th St-WB 1494 Off Signal C 26.7 EBL LOS F D 40.0 LOS F -..E.'., 74.7 WB Approach C 34.2 EBL at LOS F R,mn 1.09 F France Ave Traffic . E13 1494 Off' Ramp Signal C I I 28.3 EBL LOS F C I 34.1 I EBL LOS F I I C I 33.4 I EBL I C 32T.1 F EBL LOS E Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Note: Based upon criteria shown in Table 21-2 City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 87 of 115 Table 21-13. Future (2014) P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service "k 'V.h I P'_ �'vL�- A �1! �U M 2 0 -Pia""u, 1,4�P' "A '_6 2 naniW to ar' & ' Tkii ylnterseedou r, 'Control M k Y" k Lew OPS;. Mili France Ave Traffic + 100 '4 W 76th St Signal +100 +100 +100 Edina Ind Blvd Traffic D 38.0 EBL at LOS F D 42.9 77.2 EBL, WBPNBI, & NBT at D 44.2 EBL at LOS F W 78th St Signal LOS F Edina Ind Blvd Traffic +100 4� "F`} +100 +100 +100 Metro Blvd Signal SB TH 100 Traffic A,.4- EM;', 80.7 59.0 EBT at LOS F F Sr +100 j E, 68.9 E13T at LOS F W 77th St Signal NB TH 100 Traffic 756 NB Approach & EB Approach +100 ro EB Approach W 77th St Signal +100 64 1 LOS F i9mm Commercial Access Traffic NB & W 77th St Signal D 43.3 SB Approach LOS F D 35.0 EBL, NBL at LOS E D 50.3 D 35.5 EBL, NBL, & NBT at LOS F Computer Ave Traffic +100 WBT, WB& & NBL at LOS W 77th Signal 111:,I"F-.A� +100 +100 60.3 F Parklawn Ave Traffic T;KF +100 V, W 77th St Signal +100 + 100 C 28.6 SBT at LOS F W 77th St Traffic +100 V 676 . SBL & SBT at El-�� 745 SBT & SBL C 27.1 Minnesota or Signal LOS F . at LOS F France Ave/ Traffic Minnesota Dr Signal F-7, 4-, +100 +100 +100 +100 WB 1494 Traffic B 11.8 B 12.1 D 52.1 WBR & NBT B 11.5 E Bush Lake Signal at LOS F EB 1494 Traffic E Bush Lake signal B 18.7 B 18.3 B 18.4 B 18.3 American Blvd Traffic E Bush Lake Signal A 9.8 A 9.6 A 9.6 A 9.7 France Ave Traffic EBL & SBT at EBL & SBT W 78th St-WB 1494 Off Signal E;T 64.8 EBL & SBT LOS F D 53.9 D 50.9 El, 55.7 EBL & SBT LOS F LOS F at LOS F kl�"' France Ave Traffic EB 1494 Off Ramp Signal , C 21.6 I I 13 I 19.4 I I 13 I 19.0 B I 19.3 I Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Note: Based upon criteria shown in Table 21-2 City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 88 of 115 Table 21-14. Future (2030) A.M. Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service r! 2A n 4 �2 e� 4W,33 .1, T ri a OA S.. �Dil Notes t: a France Ave Traffic C NBL at LOS F D 37.5 NBL at LOS F E, tf 55.1 NBL at LOS F C 31.9 SBL, EBL, & WBL at LOS E W 76th St Signal .34.4 NBL at LOS F Edina Ind Blvd/ Traffic C 29.1 NBL at LOS E +too F, +100 C 28.9 W 78th St signal Edina Ind Blvd Traffic B 19.4 +100 F +100 B 10.9 Metro Blvd Signal SB TH 100 Traffic EB Approach EBT & WBL W 77th St signal D 49.2 +100 +100 at LOS F D 37.2 at LOS F NB TH 100 Traffic EBT & EBR i5 EB Approach EB Approach W 77th St Signal D 52.2 at LOS F 4"�'E 79.9 at LOS F 81.7 at LOS F D 39.0 EBTat LOS F Commercial Access Traffic A 8.6 B 11.3 A 9.1 A 7.9 W 77th St Signal Computer Ave / Traffic W 77th Signal C 21.0 I C 26.3 B 19.8 C 23.3 I Parklawn Ave / Traffic WBT & SBL WBT & SBL WBT & SBL SBL & WBT W 77th St Signal C 24.2 at LOSE C 30.8 at LOSE +100 at LOSE C 23.0 at LOS F W 77th St Traffic Minnesota Dr Signal A 9.3 A 9.3 I A 7.6 I B 11.5 France Ave / Traffic SBL, EBL, & WBL at LOSE SBL, EBL, & WBL at LOSE EBL, SHI, & WBL at LOSE SBL, EBL, & WBL at LOS E Minnesota or Signal C 32.4 NBL at LOS F C . 341 NBL at LOS F D 397 . NBL at LOS F C 341 . NBL at LOS F WB 1494 Traffic B 15.3 F +100 +100 B 14.9 E Bush Lake Signal EB 1494 Traffic B 14.8 96.2 =F +100 B 14.9 E Bush Lake signal American Blvd Traffic E Bush Lake Signal B 12.2 +100 +100 B 12 SBL at LOS E France Ave Traffic EBL & WBL EB & WB Approach NBL & WBL at LOS E C 26.7 EBL LOS F C 32.2 + 100 C 31.5 W 78th St -WB 1494 Off Ramp Signal at LOS F - !�! at LOS F EBL at LOS F France Ave C 28.3 EBL LOS F I I CT31.9 EBL at LOS F C 28.4 EBL at LOS F C 33.1 EBL at LOSE I EB 1494 Off Ramp Signal I I I Source:. WSB & Associates, Inc. Note: Based upon criteria shown in Table 21-2 City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 89 of 115 Table 21-15. Future (2030) P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Note: Based upon criteria shown in Table 21-2 City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 90 of 115 W� "'WP11-111 M wd U f-No France Ave Traffic 4�"'F EB Approach, WBL W 76th St Signal +100 +100 SBT at LOS F F"' +100 +100 Edina Ind Blvd Traffic D 43.2 EB Approach D 48.0 EBL at LOS F 82.7 EB Approach D 51.6 at LOS F Edina Ind Blvd Traffic F t , r," +100 +100 '-.F, -�4 +100 F +100 Metro Blvd Signal JZ2 SB TH 100 Traffic ilr,11�1' 11.2 EB Approach `;�7 J W 77th St Signal a, LOS F 56.7 EBT & EBR LOS F +100 72.0 EBT & EBR LOS F NB TH 100 Traffic 16.7 EBL, EBT & NBL +100 EBL & WBT EB A A PP � � F t LOS E +100 66.3 at LOS F Commercial Access Traffic 1 416 EBL & NBT C 335 EBL, NBT, & WBT NBL, SBL, & EBL NB Approach & EBL at W 77th St Signal - at LOS F . at LOS E D 495 . at LOS F C . 336 LOS F Computer Ave Traffic 'VM.- 4. +100 + WBT & NBL W 777th signal 100 F +100 ��E--- N. 61.6 at LOS F Parklawn Ave Traffic W 77th St Signal ;fDIA-11 1V 100 +100 -�'gn +100 C 29.3 W 771h St Traffic 62.5 SBL at LOS F -E 67.2 SB Approach E 72.8 SBL LOS F C 25.2 Minnesota Dr signal at LOS F at France Ave Traffic Minnesota or Signal F RR +100 vF'Z" +100 +100 +100 WB 1494 Traffic B 11.0 B 11.5 56.3 NBT & WBR E Bush Lake Signal at LOS F B 16.1 EB 1494 Traffic E Bush Lake Signal B 18.0 I B 18 B 18.1 B 19 American Blvd Traffic E Bush Lake Signal A 8.9 A 9.5 A 9.5 B 10 France Ave Traffic D 54.6 EBL & SBT at D 54.2 EBL & SBT at 56.8 EBL & SBT at EBL & SBT at W 78th St-WB 1-494 Off Ram Signal LOS F LOS F LOS F D 52.3 LOS F France Ave Tra Traffic EB 1-494 Off Ramp Signal B 19.8 TBT19 .4 i C 20.0 B 19.1 Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Note: Based upon criteria shown in Table 21-2 City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 90 of 115 (ii) Regional Interstate System Currently, the surrounding interstate system experiences significant delay during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. For this reason, it is important to estimate the additional traffic that is anticipated due to increased redevelopment within the Gateway Study Area. Existing traffic counts were obtained from Mn/DOT for April 2007 for interstate mainlines and ramps. The redevelopment traffic estimates for the four scenarios were added to these counts. The results are illustrated on Tables 21 -16 and 21 -17. The gray shading indicates an interstate ramp, and bold indicates Mn/DOT requested loops. As shown, Scenario 3 would have the largest impact to the I -494 and TH 100. Percentage of growth on sections of I -494 would increase traffic volumes by a maximum of ten percent during the a.m. peak hour and 12 percent during the p.m. peak hour. Northbound TH 100 increases by 30 percent during the a.m. peak hour and 15 percent during the p.m. peak hour just north of the W 77th Street interchange. The other scenarios have little impact on the I -494 with most locations having less than a one percent increase. The most growth is on TH 100 just north of the W 77`h Street interchange and its ramps. Weave segment and ramp junction analysis is displayed in Table 21 -18. Projections for I -494 mainline were developed using growth rates from Year 2017 I -494 CORSIM forecasts provided by Mn/DOT. Two conditions were analyzed: a 2014 No Build Condition and 2014 Scenario 3. The 2014 No Build includes the projected increase in traffic volumes to be used for comparison. Scenario 3 was chosen for evaluation because it represents the worst case condition since it generates the highest volume of trips. As shown in the table, the following locations are anticipated to be deficient by 2014: • I -494 Eastbound - Merge from France Avenue • I -494 Westbound - Merge from France Avenue (This merge section was noted as deficient during the existing conditions.) - Weave segment between TH 100 and East Bush Lake Road • TH 100 Northbound - Weave segment between I -494 and West 77th Street - Weave segment between West 77th Street and West 70`h Street • TH 100 Southbound - Weave segment between West 77th Street and I -494 When the traffic was added from Scenario 3, the density of traffic increased slightly. However, the same weave segments and ramp junctions remained deficient. Therefore, the deficiencies noted are due to the increase in mainline volumes, rather than the increase in redevelopment traffic at the ramps. Scenarios 1, 2, and 4 would City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 91 of 115 be expected to have less impact than Scenariio 3. The weave segment and ramp junction analysis worksheets are available on request. The ramps and ramp loops at the I -494 and TH 100 interchange are estimated to operate similar to today after development. Scenario 3 added the greatest amount of traffic to the interstate system, while only increasing the ramp volumes by about 3.5 %. The ramp ramp/loop volumes are not greater than 1900 vph, the approximate capacity stated by the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), Exhibit 25 -3 for a single lane ramp with a speed of 20 -30 mph, common for a loop. Similarly the operations of the France Avenue interchange at I -494 will not be greatly impacted by the proposed development trips. The highest France Avenue ramp volume is 1259 vehicles in the peak hour, on the eastbound exit ramp from I -494. The development is estimated to add 176 new trips to this ramp, a 14% increase. The estimated volume is less than the 1900 vph stated in the HCM. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 92 of 115 Table 21 -16. A.M. Peak Hour Freeway Growth from Redevelopment Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. * Interpolated volume from 2001 count and 2017 forecast City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 93 of 115 3 AEA Ex�shog - `,, ` �Scensno l Scenano 2F t Sceoano "3 Scenano 4 Freeway Segment 4 r Z, add r < 'Dev x "y? DevTrips % Growtti= •Trips' %Growth .,Dw Trips % Crowth Dev Trips„ %,Growth;' West of E Bush Lake Rd 5183 142 2.7% 144 2.8% 510 9.8% 12 0.27% Exit ao'.) Buih:LakeRd �_,_,._z_._ _ 888, -� --" 939% '•222 _ : •25.0 ° / .t_ , 5 , 0.6 °/ Between E Bush Lake Rd Rams 4295 80 1.9% 56 1.3% 288 6.7% 7 0.2% Entrance,Ram' ,from'E•Bush L ake Rd,. ' .3 _ _; -, ',`645_ - : :' y._': 0 _: s...__ :0.0 "/0 < ;_.:0 O:Oo/ , 0 0 :0 °/ ; " ` 0 : .0.0% n C East of E Bush Lake Rd 4940 80 1.6% 56 1.1 °/ 288 5.8% 71 0.1% c West of France Ave 6973 50 0.7% 15 0.2% 180 2.6% 8 0.1% Exit-Ramp 'to.Fiance•Ave..i_. _?.,.. ;; �.. 1259 ` -: .'.. - . 49 ,_ s� >., Y3.9% 12 1:0 °/ • 176 : ` :14:0 ° / 4 ; .; ' -0.3 °/ w Between France Avenue Rams 5714 1 0.0% 3 0.1% 4 0.1% 4 0.1% Entrance.Ram I o6" ,from,.SBIFrance Av _ , 267 >: .- `- 4 y , �'•.;• :15% "_ ` : .- 15 =' ,' : - 5.6% . ;-19 :7.1% 19 7.1% Between France Avenue Ram s 5981 5 0.1% 18 0.3% 23 0.4% 23 0.4% Entrance•Ram ' fiom' NB France Ave € %: 7 307_;.. Y t 0 . , .: " .0.0 /o 0 4 .., East of France Ave 6295 5 0.1% 18 0.3% 23 0.40 231 0.4% East of France Ave 6706 91 1.4% 129 1.9% '325 4.8% 7 0.1% Exit:Rein ".to'France•`Ave, L = . ..`,,. _I1005 �:,. .', 49 ; s- .,.;r4 4.% 70 ° 4 ; . _.,. X0:4°/ Between France Avenue Rams 5625 42 0.7% 591 1.0% 149 2.6% 3 0.1% C Edtrailce.' Rani ". frofn NB'Fraace Ave,:... r _. ` ' ', 383 ' _ . - . -'_ O I _ •' :. ".:'0.0% ... - _ _' 0 -; ; . 0:0 °/ .. -' 0 .: : .0:0% . , a -: 0 .. 0.0 °/ o Between France Avenue Rams 6008 42 0.7% 59 1.0% 149 2.5% 3 0.0% Entrance froin'SBrFiance Ave +:�_ 1 K.`•.._ _. 244,3 ', .... _:,. 6 z. _ ±..:_2:S% ; _ _ : : ': 20 8ti2 °/ ! _ .24 s .w ,-9 :8% ._ _ ". 25 : °: <•. 10.2 ° / 3 West of France Ave 6252 48 0.8% 79 1.3% 173 2.8% 28 0.4% East of Bush Lake Rd 5769 1 0.0% 3 0.1% 3 0.1% 3 0.1% 0.00/0 West of E Bush Lake Rd 5193 1 0.0% 3 0.1% 3 0.1% 3 0.1% b South of W 77th St Rams 2868 87 3.0% 123 4.3% 310 10.8%1 7 0.2% c - " :. ; : 237' ; - - = _:87 s" 36:.7,% :. ' 123 .. :5.1.9 ° / : ... _ 310 . - 130.8 ° / , '" :.:. -, • 7 ' °,.. : -3.0 °/ Between W 77th St Rams 2631 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 37 .:: ::T2:3 °/ -_ :.45 `:1 =;1.5:0% 46 `''1.15:3°/ °o Z North W 77th St Ramps 2932 11 0.4% of 37, 1.3% 45 1.5% 46 1.6% North of W 77th St Rams 2529 224 8.9% 316 12.5% 797 31.5% 19 0.8% 2: : Wt - toW 77hSt 1255 :�. . i :22 , S16 ',25.2°/ 797 6.5% 19 :-1.5 / °o Between W 77th St Rams 1274 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0 % _2 0.9% : ;7 "_ °" 3:2°/ .`'_ .. ,_ . _ 8 +_!:.. ,3 >7% - 8 _ ,, ,'3.7°/ South of W 77th St Rams 2529 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0°/ I oo ".Ram -- tb%adb6dhdj44 4 ", :, 1903' . 1 x_,_0:1% 3 ` . ' 0:2% t. =: 0;2,% 4 ', 0.2% .._ .y_ _:., _. . _•. s .•4 _ Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. * Interpolated volume from 2001 count and 2017 forecast City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 93 of 115 Table 21 -17. P.M. Peak Hour Freeway Growth from Redevelopment x 7 �' ''_ ' l of r� �'�I v. 'c'� -. , �t'f• t;j Y k r �Y _ :s "r >, 1 y r _ 'rTi N' t r i - .; Z ' +. Freeway'Se`gnaent ¢ Ez�ctin g r °Scenano 1 Scenano 2 Sdensno 3 Scenano 4 1 , r` y , �rF '} <r t '.. +Y ry43tF y'- y r`�..i '4• •ci „�,F x 4 _;t i�- -_�.'� ' __ ,,� r ,�'•4 t_ _ •2- 200.7! �D.`e�!�t �, %,Growlh.';DevTri s.' %`Growlh 'DevTri sr; %;Grow(h�; ".AeV.Tri "s; %.'Gio»7h; `� '- _mss...'q��.�. _1C :�� � �ar_•: ' =,' t4 West of E Bush Lake Rd 4205 142 3.4% 1441 3.4% 510 12.10/ 12 0.3% Ezif •Ram toE_Bush;i akn.Rd.,; .v' _ , _ _: 743. � _'� �'< °62 _ _ �' 83% ; 88 .: _ '1''1 8% s = _ _ _ ;'' 222 _ '29.9 ° / _ ° -'S ..:''. ;'0.7 °/ Between E Bush Lake Rd Rams 3462 80 2.3% 56 1.6% 288 8.3% '7 0.2% Entrance ?Ram from:E B. "ush T akrAd L 61C. _ ; 0 ' ; , :Y.. 0.0% _ 0 ° = r.:0 0 °/ ..` 0 , .: 0 0 °/ .: '0 :10.0 ° / East of E Bush Lake Rd 4076 80 2.0% 56 1.4%1 288 7.1% 7 0.2% c West of France Ave 5653 50 0.9% 15 0.3% 180 3.2% 8 0.1% Exit= to;France.AVe * _ : s" ?_ 896 " ,, :�. xl N9 = '.n5.5% 12 ,- 1.3% <'.. _ :_ -' 176 19.6 ° / ; . = . 4 0.4 % w Between France Avenue Rams 4757 1 0.0 %° 3 0.1 4 0.1°/ 4 0.1% Entrance Rarii':Loo-':fr`oin:SB France -Av " :..797 .; ..' ::4 O.5% ' ,: ;1.5 _ :.. =119 ° / . -. ._ ,19 :: 2.4% , :' 19 Between France Avenue Rams 5554 5 0.1% 18 0.3% 23 0.4% 23 0.4% a Entrance Rain' froiu N$'.France'Ave.r '.. 4,96 .. _ -_ • :..; ` 0,� -' - 0.0 /° . 11 o y Oo/ East of France Ave 6064 5 0.1% 18 0 3% 23 0 4% 23 0.4°/ East of France Ave 6373 6 0.1% 17 0.3% 24 0.4% 17 0.3°/ Exit Ram ro Fr"ance,Ave; j . -- - s' g57 . . ,r.':: x;• 4 _. a '..0.5% _ 12 .14 °/ . 17 '2 0 °/ 12 ,114 ° / Between France Avenue Rams 5631 2 0.0% 5 0.1% 7 0.1°/ 5 0.1% Entrance, Ram' afiom NB;'France; Aver °f . r.,' 624 . r :r4. �.'. '0 '� "� p o 0 Between France Avenue Rams 6255 2 0.0% 5 0.1% 7 0.1%1 5 0.1% .. _ Entranct'&om'SB Fiance'Ave� :;_'. w _ >:. ,... ;774 _ "' 39 ,�<_, _ _ _ 5 0% - ' 60 : -_ 7 8 °/ .' 161. , , ..20 8 °( t ;_ . =3 -f A;4% 3 West of France Ave 7029 41 0.6% 65 0.9% 168 2.4% 8 0.1% East of Bush Lake Rd 6975. 19 0.3% 30 0.4% 80 1.1% 2 0.0% Exie'RaFu rto'E-Bush.T ake:$d'� ": `. _ _ °':502 _ , sue: .__ :'aQ � �0.0 %; . 0 :: _ _ 0 o/ •_�' "0 _ , {: _0 ;: Oi0 West of E Bush Lake Rd 6473 19 0.3% 30 0.59/ 80 1.2% 2 0.0% n South of W 77th St Rams 2723 4 0.1% 11 0.4%1 15 0.6%1 1 0.4°/ :4 ; 5.1% ? U ' 11 1. _. . :15 . ; 19.0 ° / 11 `•13:9 ° / Between W 77th St Rams 2644 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0°/ 0 0.0% c Entrance :fip W 77th St: " z =; , 1:181_ :: r_ :33 ,:;1!14% '_' 208 ; '17 6% ., . ,,� :, :. '362 4.7 6 °/ .: '•: < 1.2 ' 4 ,- 1•.0°/ °o North of W 77th St Ramps 3825 135 3.5% 208, 5.4% 562 14.7 % 12 0.3 % North of W 77th St Rams 1966 20 1.0% 57 2.9% 78 4.0% 54 2.7% Eiiit- RaifiO, td-MV77th,St; 668° •°x:54. , .;_ . 78 .- . 1171 <<`< 8:1_/ a Between W 77th St Ramps 1298 0 0.0% 0 0.0°/ 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 433,_ '_x� >< s.:33 .wz c.12.2% : r g2 ; :1.8 9% . '221 , ;51 0% :;; h South of W 77th St Rams "stbouod 2739 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0°/ Loo ;Rm fo?E8 I- 494, =;c ; .': 1731,•, •'z�' `.J<5 t'0:9% ( ',1':3% .''61 3.5% = c x'•:1 Oa% _;� :23 ,,, Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. ' Interpolated volume from 2001 count and 2017 forecast Exy of Latna Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 94 of 115 Table 21 -18. Future (2014) Freeway Level of Service K \01686- 04 \TralTic\Freeway\Frceway Volumesxls Source: Year 2017 I-494 CORSIM Forecast Volumes Provided by Mn/DOT and WSB & Associates, Inc. Note: Based upon criteria shown in Table 21 -3 and Table 21 -4 City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 95 of 115 2014yScenano Merge or Ramp Junction A M. =Peak Hour P M .Peak Hour, A M Peslt!Hour ,P M ;P;eakflour„ ;Location `° Y LOS Density i LO S Density ' LOS` Density; LOS ; Density , _ Diverge to East Bush B 19.0 B 16.0 C 22.0 B 19.0 Lake Road Exit Weave between East Bush D 32.6 D 28.2 D 34.4 D 30.0 -B Lake Road and TH 100 w v Diverge to France Avenue D 30.0 C 21.0 D 32.0 C 23.0 F LL.R :N Merge from France Avenue � E� 37.0 r � 1;�, 38.0 37 0 °Yd�E�* 38.0 Diverge to France Avenue D 33.0 D 30.0 D 34.0 D 30.0 D c 0 0 Merge from France Avenue E y: 35.0 E 41.0 E 36.0 z sa F$ } " 43.0 Weave between TH 100 D 33.2 E n 39.8 D 33 3 E 40.3 and East Bush Lake Road I t of Y t ".,,o%r?. -�--i Weave between I -494 and G I sE 35.04 E3 37.3 E 39 8 '���Ex 37.5 West 77th Street Fz, } ' r r,, , bpi r 0 O n oWeave between West 77th z C 21.6 a'"" E 36.4 C 22 3 F,r Fwd'' 45.1 Street and West 70th Street -d Weave between West 70th B 11.3 D 30.3 D 30.5 D 33.9 g o Street and West 77th Street 0 -. c Weave between West 77th D 32.4 ' rg 40.7 D 32.6 ti 44.5 En Street and I -494 .,E . f , ,E K \01686- 04 \TralTic\Freeway\Frceway Volumesxls Source: Year 2017 I-494 CORSIM Forecast Volumes Provided by Mn/DOT and WSB & Associates, Inc. Note: Based upon criteria shown in Table 21 -3 and Table 21 -4 City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 95 of 115 D. Transit Currently there are two forms of transit service within the City of Edina. Paratransit Paratransit services are currently provided by Edina Dial -A -Raid Transportation. Door -to -door services provided using a wheelchair lift equipped van on a first -come, first- service basis. Hours of operation are Monday through Friday, 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., 24 -hour advance notice for scheduling is required. The fee is $3.00 per one -way ride. Anyone living in Edina is eligible. Scheduled Transit The key transit facility in Edina is a Southdale transit center. This is part of the Southdale shopping mall. It includes a covered shelter area with routes and schedule information. The Southdale transit center is one of the busier transit centers in the Twin Cities, with eight transit lines which stop and link at this location. There are also 100 parking spaces at a metro transit Park'n Ride lot at this location. Scheduled transit service for Edina residents is currently provided by Metro Transit ( a division of Metropolitan Council) and by Southwest Metro Transit. The existing scheduled services to Edina residents is depicted on Figure 21 -22 and summarized on Table 21 -21 below. Table 21 -21— Existing Scheduled Transit Service in Edina Route Number Service Route /Area Service Description 6 Edina (includes Southdale Transit Center), High frequency local service, all Uptown, downtown Minneapolis, University day /evening, all week; 5 -15 of Minnesota minute headways 46 Edina (includes 50 /France), south Local service all day /evening, all Minneapolis, St Paul week: 30 -60 minute headways 114 Edina (includes Southdale Transit Center), Commuter /student service during south Minneapolis, Uptown University of a.m. and p.m. rush hours, Minnesota weekdays 146 Edina (Vernon Ave.), southwest Commuter express (I -35W) Minneapolis, downtown Minneapolis service during a.m. and p.m. rush hours, weekdays 152 Edina (includes Southdale Transit Center), Commuter /student express (I- Lake Street, University of Minnesota 35W) service during a.m. and p.m. rush hours, weekdays 515 Edina (Includes Southdale Transit Center), Local service, all day /evening, all Richfield, South Minneapolis, Bloomington week; 10 -30 minute headways (includes Mall of America), Veterans Medical Center alternate route 538 Edina (includes Southdale Transit Center), Local service, all day /evening, all Bloomington includes Mall of America week; 30 -60 minute headways 539' Edina (includes Southdale Transit Center), Local service, all day /evening, all Bloomington (includes Normandale week; 30 -60 minute headways Community College, Mall of America 540 Edina, Richfield (includes Best Buy Local service, all day /evening, all Headquarters), Bloomington (includes Mall week; 15 -30 minute headways of America) during a.m. /p.m. rush hours, otherwise 30 -60 minute headways City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 96 of 115 568 Downtown Minneapolis, south Minneapolis, Weekdays only, one a.m. run Edina, Minnetonka (Opportunity Partners) from Minneapolis to Opportunity Partners; one p.m. run from Opportunity Partners to Minneapolis 578 Edina (includes Southdale Transit Center), Commuter express service (TH downtown Minneapolis 62 and I -35W) during a.m. and p.m. rush hours 587 Edina, downtown Minneapolis Commuter express service (TH 100 and I -394) during a.m. and p.m. rush hours, weekdays 631 (Southwest Metro Chanhassen, Eden Prairie, Edina ( Southdale Weekday service, morning Transit) Transit Center) through evening; approximately 10 runs per day each direction Note: all routes are Metro Transit with the exception of 631, which is Southwest Metro Transit. E. Non - Motorized Transportation Sidewalks and other pedestrian facilities are important components of Edina's transportation infrastructure. Sidewalks and paths provide safe movement for individuals of all ages, decrease dependence on motor vehicles, and encourage active lifestyles. An important key to an effective municipal sidewalk system is in providing networking continuity such that there is broad geographic coverage for a range of users without notable gaps. The Gateway Study Area is a critical link in Edina's non - motorized transportation system. The City of Edina is currently in the process of updating their transportation plan as part of the 2008 comprehensive plan preparation. As part of that plan, a variety of Travel Demand Management (TDM) and non - motorized vehicle transportation (transit, pedestrianibike facilities) are being considered. Policies and guidelines for development of these facilities or expanded facilities will be included as part of that document. However, as development continues to grow, specifically in the Gateway Study Area, consideration of site - specific improvements as developments are proposed needs to be included. These would include upgrading the existing bus shelters to become ADA compliant and improvements of sidewalk and/or path connections. F. Transportation Improvements Mitigation Plan Based upon the analysis, deficiencies exist for all scenarios near the TH 100/West 77th Street Interchange and on France Avenue. Intersection signal timing was first modified to provide optimal operations in each scenario. Mitigation strategies were developed for each scenario are listed below and shown on Figure 21 -21. The intersection operations with these improvements are shown in Tables 21 -19 and 21 -20. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 97 of 115 (1) Scenarios 1 and 4 The following mitigation strategies are needed for Scenario 1 and 4 to accommodate both 2014 and 2030 traffic projections: Intersection: France Avenue / West 76th Street Improvement: Extend one southbound thru lane on France Avenue to create a total of four thru lanes Intersection: France Avenue / West 78th Street Improvement: Eastbound dual right turn lanes on West 78`h Street Southbound lanes approaching the I -494 ramps restriped to provide exclusive lanes to both westbound I -494 and eastbound I -494. The right lane will drop at the westbound I -494 ramp providing an exclusive ramp lane. The second lane will also be an exclusive lane leading to I -494 eastbound, reducing the weaving and stacking of vehicles that occur today. The County has expressed interest in participation. Intersection: Edina Industrial Boulevard / West 78th Street Improvement: Eastbound dual left turn lanes on West 78th Street Intersection: Edina Industrial Boulevard / Metro Boulevard Improvement: Add southbound right turn lane on Metro Boulevard, restriping the existing two southbound lanes to accommodate an exclusive left turn lane, and a thru/left lane, providing dual left turn lanes. Add 300 foot eastbound left turn lane on Edina Industrial Boulevard Intersection: Northbound TH 100 / West 77th Street Improvement: Add 150 foot northbound right turn lane on Frontage Road Westbound dual right turn lanes on West 77th Street (2) Scenario 2 Scenario 2 will require all the improvements listed above in addition to the following: Intersection: Minnesota Drive / France Avenue Improvement: Dual westbound left turn lanes on Minnesota Drive Eastbound dual left turn lanes on Minnesota Drive Intersection: Northbound TH 100 / West 77th Street Improvement: Add 150 foot eastbound right turn lane on West 77th Street Intersection: Computer Avenue / West 77`h Street Improvement: Northbound dual left turn lanes on Computer Avenue City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 98 of 115 Intersection: Minnesota Drive / West 77h Street / Johnson Avenue Improvement: Southbound dual left turn lanes on West 770i Street (3) Scenario 3 Scenario 3 will require all the above improvements listed under Scenarios 1, 2, and 4 in addition to the following: Intersection: Minnesota Drive / France Avenue Improvement: Eastbound dual right turn lanes on Minnesota Drive Intersection: France Avenue / West 78h Street Improvement: Westbound dual right turn lanes on West 780i Street Interchange: TH 100 / West 770i Street Improvement: Six -lane section from Metro Boulevard to Computer Avenue Dual left turn turns at both TH 100 Ramps (Hence an eight -lane bridge) (4) Transit/Non- Motorized Transportation As redevelopment occurs in the Gateway Study Area, consideration of site - specific improvements needs to be included as developments are proposed. These would include upgrading the existing transit facilities, including bus shelters, to become ADA compliant and improving the sidewalk and/or path connections in and around each redevelopment. (5) General The mitigation measures discussion above (1 — 3) are needed to address full build -out of the site and surrounding area. Specific mitigation measures required for proposed development plans will be established through traffic and transportation studies required for each development proposal. These proposals will need to document compliance with the Final AUAR and. Mitigation Plan. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 99 of 115 Table 21 -19. Future (2030) A.M. Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service With Mitiontinn Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Note: Based upon criteria shown in Table 21 -2 City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review Page 100 of 115 September 2007 1 2030 A.M. Peak Hour. `' ' ' ,a ' Traffic _ __ .:. " • Scenario 1 _ .. ' . _ Scenario 2 :-- Scenario 3' Scenario ,4 -:. T. Idtersectuon _'Control" -'IAS# 'Delay.- Notes. '-LOS, . Delay: "' Notes LOS Delay.: Notes LOS IDeiay Notes France Ave / Traffic W 76th St Signal C 25.5 C 26.0 C 33.6 C 25.0 Edina Ind Blvd / Traffic W 78th St Signal C 24.5 C 24.0 C 29.0 C 23.8 Edina Ind Blvd / Traffic Metro Blvd Signal C 24.6 C 21.0 C 28.6 C 31.0 SB TH 100 / Traffic W 77th St Signal D 44.1 D 53.2 D 52.5 D 46.0 NB TH 100 / Traffic W 77th St Signal C 23.6 C 25.9 C 33.0 C 23.1 Commercial Access / Traffic W 77th St Signal A 4.8 B 12.4 A 9.2 A 4.9 Computer Ave / Traffic W 77th Signal A 6.0 B 11.5 A 7.2 A 6.6 Parklawn Ave / Traffic W 77th St Signal C 29.8 C 23.0 B 17.7 C 27.6 W 77th St / Traffic Minnesota Dr Signal B 14.5 B 11.5 B 11.8 B 16.0 France Ave / Traffic Minnesota Dr Signal C 22.3 C 24.3 D 36.5 C 21.5 WB 1494 / Traffic E Bush Lake Signal B 16.3 B 16.9 C 22.7 B 15.2 EB 1494 / Traffic E Bush Lake Signal B 17.5 B 17 C 20.8 B 17.7 American Blvd / Traffic E Bush Lake Signal A 9.1 B 12.8 B 11.9 A 8.9 France Ave / Traffic W 78th St -WB 1 -494 Off Ramp Signal C 22 l C 29.8 D 49.8 C 22.3 France Ave / Traffic EB I494 Off Ramp Signal C 33.7 C 33.9 C 31.9 C 32.7 Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Note: Based upon criteria shown in Table 21 -2 City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review Page 100 of 115 September 2007 Table 21 -20. Future (2030) P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Level of Service with Mitigation Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Note: Based upon criteria shown in Table 21 -2 City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review Page 101 of 115 September 2007 :..__- ...... .: Peak 13odr .,• ,.- . -> -d <'Sceneno 1 ` =;L; Scenario 2 Scenario Sceoano 4 =, Traffic` LOS; ,'Dela Y Notes LOS : _Dele Y Notes ': -.. LOS' : Dela' Y . ;,_ ,:, Notes LOS `Delay. Notes.. ;IuterseMton ; .. ' Control. France Ave / Traffic C 32.4 C 29.3 D 41.6 C 23.7 W 76th St Signal Edina Ind Blvd / Traffic C 33.4 C 33.5 D 36.8 D 35.4 W 78th St Signal Edina Ind Blvd / Traffic C 29.3 C 25.6 C 20.5 C 32.9 Metro Blvd Signal SB TH 100 / Traffic W 77th St Signal D 44.6 D 42.8 C 30.1 D 50.1 NB TH 100 / Traffic C 31.4 D 38.7 C 28.1 C 24.3 W 77th St Signal Commercial Access / Traffic W 77th St Signal B 12.9 C 21.7 C 29.9 B 16.5 Computer Ave / Traffic W 77th Signal C 20.2 C 22.5 D 44.3 C 24.0 Parklawn Ave / Traffic W 77th St Signal D 38.1 C 33.5 D 48.1 D 41.8 W 77th St / Traffic C 31.4 C 25.0 E 58.5 D 40.0 Minnesota Dr Signal France Ave / Traffic D 52.8 D 43.1 C 31.1 D 53.1 Minnesota Dr Signal WB 1494 / Traffic E Bush Lake Signal B 12.1 B 12 B 13.1 B 12.2 EB 1494 / Traffic B 17.8 B 18.9 B 18.3 C 20 E Bush Lake Signal American Blvd / Traffic B 10.5 A 9.6 A 9.9 B 10.9 E Bush Lake Signal France Ave / Traffic W 78th St -WB I-494 Off Ramp Signal D 42.7 C 32.7 C 29.3 D 49.1 France Ave / Traffic EB 1-494 Off Ramp Signal C 20.2 C 34.2 C 20.6 D 50.5 Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Note: Based upon criteria shown in Table 21 -2 City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review Page 101 of 115 September 2007 22. VEHICLE - RELATED AIR EMISSIONS. Estimate the effect of the project's traffic generation on air quality, including carbon monoxide levels. Discuss the effect of traffic improvements or other mitigation measures on air quality impacts. Note: If the project involves 500 or more parking spaces, consult EAW Guidelines about whether a detailed air quality analysis is needed. Based on Mn/DOT project guidance, an air quality analysis is not needed unless the total intersection approach exceeds 77,000 vehicles per day. Under the most intensive development for traffic (Scenario 3), the projected total approach traffic at the busiest intersection France Avenue / Minnesota Drive is approximately 42,700 vehicles per day, or approximately 45 percent below the volume warranting an air quality analysis. Therefore, air quality analysis is not needed. 23. STATIONARY SOURCE AIR EMISSIONS. Describe the type, sources, quantities and compositions of any emissions from stationary sources of air emissions such as boilers, exhaust stacks or fugitive dust sources. Include any hazardous air pollutants (consult EAW Guidelines for a listing), any greenhouse gases (such as carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxides), and ozone - depleting chemicals (chlorofluorocarbons, hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons or sulfur hexafluoride). Also describe any proposed pollution prevention techniques and proposed air pollution control devices. Describe the impacts on air quality. AUAR Guidance: This item is not applicable to an AUAR. Any stationary air emission source large enough to merit environmental review requires individual review. These types of uses are not anticipated within the Study Area. 24. ODORS, NOISE, and DUST Will the project generate odors, noise or dust during construction or during operation? N Yes ❑ No If yes, describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities or intensity and any proposed measures to mitigate adverse impacts. Also identify locations of nearby sensitive receptors and estimate impacts on them. Discuss potential impacts on human health or quality of life. (Note: fugitive dust generated by operations may be discussed at item 23 instead of here.) AUAR Guidance: Dust, odors, and construction noise need not be addressed. Traffic - related noise is included in the analysis along with a'dust and noise mitigation plan. A Construction Noise Noise will be generated during construction of any project within the Study Area by construction equipment. Construction noise will be a temporary impact and may be controlled by limiting construction activities to daytime hours in accordance with Edina's ordinances and assuring that construction equipment is properly muffled. The City generally prohibits construction work between 9:OOPM and 7:OOAM Monday through Friday and between 7:OOPM and 8:OOAM on Saturday, Sunday, and holidays. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 102 of 115 B. Traffic- Related Noise State standards have been developed for maximum sound levels in residential and commercial areas. By comparing existing and estimated future sound levels to these standards, areas can be recognized that are in need of possible noise mitigation. The analysis that follows characterizes existing traffic noise levels in the Study Area, assesses the effect of redevelopment of the Study Area on future noise levels, and analyzes potential mitigation measures. The noise analysis consisted of selecting specific receptor sites and modeling existing and future noise levels. Analyzed receptor sites consist of the outdoor areas of residential and commercial properties. Noise Analysis Methodology Noise is defined as any unwanted sound. Sound travels in a wave motion and produces a sound pressure level. This sound pressure level is commonly measured in decibels. Decibels represent the logarithmic measure of sound energy relative to a reference energy level. For highway traffic noise, an adjustment, or weighting, of the high- and low- pitched sounds is made to approximate the way that an average person hears sounds. The adjusted sound levels are stated in units of "A- weighted decibels" (dBA). A sound increase.of three dBA is barely perceptible to the human ear, a five dBA increase is clearly noticeable, and a 10 dBA increase is heard twice as loud. For example, if the sound energy is doubled (e.g. the amount of traffic doubles), there is a three dBA increase in noise, which is just barely noticeable to most people. On the other hand, if traffic increases by a factor of 10 so that it produces 10 times the sound energy level over a reference level, then there is a 10 dBA increase, and the human ear hears it as twice as loud. In Minnesota, traffic noise impacts are evaluated by measuring and/or modeling the traffic noise levels that are exceeded 10 percent and 50 percent of the time during the hour of the day and/or night that has the heaviest traffic. These numbers are identified as the Llo and L50 levels. The Llo value is compared to FHWA noise abatement criteria. The following chart provides a rough comparison of the noise levels of some common noise sources. Sound Pressure Level (dBA) Noise Source 140---------------------- - - - - -- -Jet Engine (at 25 meters) 130---------------------- - - - - -- -Jet Aircraft (at 100 meters) 120---------------------- - - - - -- -Rock and Roll Concert 110----------------------- - - - - -- Pneumatic Chipper 100----------------------------- Jointer/Planer 90 ----------------------------- Chamsaw 80 ---------------------- - - - - -- -Heavy Truck Traffic 70 ----------------------- - - - - -- Business Office 60 ----------------------- - - - - -- Conversational Speech 50 ----------------------- - - - - -- Library City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 103 of 115 40 ----------------------- - - - - -- Bedroom, 30 ----------------------------- Secluded,Woods Whisper Source: "A Guide to Noise Control in Minnesota," Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, http: / /www.pca.state.mn.us /programs /pubs /noise.pdf and "Highway Traffic Noise," FHWA, http: / /www.fhwa. dot .gov /enviromnent/htnoise.htm. Along with the volume of traffic and other factors (i.e., topography of the area and vehicle speed) that contribute to the loudness of traffic noise, the distance of a receptor from a sound's source is also an important factor. Sound levels decrease as distance from a source increases. The following rule of thumb regarding sound decreases due to distance is commonly used. Beyond approximately 50 feet, each time the distance between a line source (such as a road) and a receptor is doubled, sound levels decrease by three decibels over hard ground, such as pavement or water, and by four and one half decibels over vegetated areas. The MPCA has established State Noise Standards specifically for daytime and nighttime periods. For residential land uses including apartments, churches, and schools (Noise Area Classification 1 or NAC -1), the Minnesota State standards for Li0 are 65 decibels for daytime and 55 decibels for nighttime; the standards for L50 are 60 decibels for daytime and 50 decibels for nighttime. For commercial land uses (NAC -2), the Minnesota State Standards for L10 are 70 decibels for daytime and nighttime; the standards for L50 are 65 decibels for daytime and nighttime. Minnesota State Noise Standards are shown in Table 24 -1. In addition to the identified noise criteria, Mn/DOT also defines a noise impact as a "substantial increase" if the future noise levels increase five dBA or greater. Table 24 -1 Minnesota State Noise Standards Land Use Code Day (7 a.m. —10 p.m.) dBA Night (10 p.m. — 7 a.m.) dBA Residential NAC -1 Ljo of 65 Lso of 60 Ljo of 55 L5o of 50 Commercial NAC -2 Ljo of 70 L50 of 65 Ljo of 70 Lso of 65 Industrial NAC -3 Ljo of 80 Lso of 75 Ljo of 80 L50 of 75 Noise Analysis Traffic noise impacts were assessed by modeling noise levels at six receptor sites. One of the sites is located in an existing residential development (R1). The other receptors are located in areas that have planned development: two in residential areas (R1 and R2) and three in a commercial area (R4, R5, and R6). Locations were selected where buildings are likely to be placed. Receptor locations are shown on Figure 24 -1 in Appendix A. All receptor sites, except the business sites, are classified within the definition of State of Minnesota NAC -1. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 104 of 115 The business receptor sites are classified within the definition of State of Minnesota NAC -2. However it should be noted that only State roadways are regulated by the State Noise Standards. Receptors 3 -6 sites were evaluated near county and city roads even though these locations are exempt. It is optional at these locations for local jurisdictions to require noise abatement. Noise modeling was done using the noise prediction program "MINNOISF% a version of the FHWA "STAMINA" model adapted by MrYDOT.' This modeluses vehicle numbers, speed, class of vehicle, and the typical: characteristics of the roadway being analyzed. The vehicle class percentages used for all roadways were as follows: 94 percent automobiles and light trucks; four percent medium trucks, and two percent heavy trucks. Posted speed limits were used to model proposed build'conditions. Noise monitoring and modeling results for residential and commercial receptors for existing (2007) and year 2030 conditions are presented in`Tables 24 -2 and 24-3. Residential locations are represented by the bold - italic numbers. Areas shaded in gray denote deficiencies in current and future conditions. State standards were exceeded in the'a.m. and p.m. hours for Scenario 4. Receptor 2 does not meet state standards for residential uses. This site is located on the southeast quadrant of TH I004est 77th Street. However, the noise levels did not have a substantial increase (less than 1.5 dBA). The deficiencies are due to the change in use from commercial to residential. All other locations remain below State Noise Standards or do not have substantial increase in noise. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2,007 Page 105 of 115 Table 24 -2. A.M. Noise Levels Receptor 2007 2030 Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 Lio L5o LIo L50 Lto Lso LIo Lso Lio L50 1 51.1 45.9 52.2 47.7 52.4 48.0 52.8 48.5 52.5 48.2 2 65.1 59.7 65.8 60.8 65.8 60.8 65.9 60.9 3 53.8 43.2 55.1 44.9 55.3 45.1 55.5 45.4 55.1 44.9 4 46.3 38.1 47.4 39.6 47.5 39.7 47.8 40.0 47.4 39.6 5 46.4 33.0 47.7 34.5 47.8 34.6 48.1 34.9 47.7 34.5 6 58.5 37.1 59.7 38.8 59.9 39.1 60.3 39.6 59.7 38.8 Residential State Standards 65 60 65 60 65 60 65 60 65 60 Commercial State Standards 70 65 70 65 70 65 70 65 70 65 Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. Notes: Shading notes areas with deficiencies. Numbers in italic and bold contain residential land uses. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 106 of 115 Table 24 -3. P.M. Noise Levels Receptor 2007 2030 Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 4 Lio Lso LIo Lso LIo Lso Lio Lso Lio Lso 1 58.5 37.1 59.0 38.1 59.0 38.1 59.1 38.2 59.0 38.1 2 63.3 56.4 63.7 57.3 63.7 57.3 63.7 57.3 im 3 65.4 62.2 65.9 63.2 65.9 63.2 65.9 63.2 65.9 63.2 4 62.3 61.1 62.8 62.1 62.8 62.1 62.8 62.1 62.8 62.1 5 46.4 33.0 46.9 33.9 46.9 33.9 47.0 34.0 46.9 33.9 6 51.9 48.5 52.3 49.4 52.4 49.5 52.4 49.6 52.3 49.4 Residential State Standards SS 50 SS 50 SS 50 55 50 SS 50 Commercial State Standards 70 65 70 65 70 65 70 65 70 65 Source: WSB & Associates, Inc. . Notes: Shading notes areas with deficiencies. Numbers in italic and bold contain residential land uses. Noise Mitigation Noise mitigation will be necessary if any residential units are constructed near Receptor 2, located in the southwest quadrant of TH 100/West 77th Street. Any residential buildings should be constructed using noise abatement methods. C. Dust During construction, particulate emissions will temporarily increase due to the generation of fugitive dust. Construction dust and exhaust from construction equipment may have a temporary impact on air quality. Control of construction dust is addressed through the NPDES Construction Permit and erosion and sediment control. Item 16 provides more information about erosion and sediment control for the Study Area. Fugitive dust after redevelopment is complete in the Study Area is anticipated to be minimal as there will be no facilities that will generate significant amounts of dust and these areas will be stabilized. Wetting areas under construction will control fugitive dust. After construction is complete, dust levels are anticipated to be minimal because all soil surfaces would be in permanent cover (i.e., pavement or grassed areas). City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 107 of 115 D. Odors The construction and/or operation within the Study Area is not anticipated to involve any processes that would generate any odors. E. Odors, Noise, and Dust Mitigation Measures • During construction activities, the project proposer and contractor shall observe all dust control Best Management Practices for fugitive dust. • Edina will limit construction activities and any other activities that produce noise audible outside the perimeter of a property to between 7:00AM to 9:OOPM Monday through Friday and between 8:OOAM and 7:OOPM on Saturday, Sunday, and holidays. • Noise mitigation will be necessary if any residential units are constructed near Receptor 2, located in the southwest quadrant of TH I OO/West 77th Street. Any residential buildings should be constructed using noise abatement methods. Noise abatement requirements to conform to state standards can be found in Minn. Rules 7030.0050, subp. 3 25. NEARBY RESOURCES. Are any of the following resources on or in proximity to the site? a. Archaeological, historical, or architectural resources? ❑ Yes ® No b. Prime or unique farmlands or land within an agricultural preserve? ❑Yes ®No c. Designated parks, recreation areas, or trails? ® Yes ❑ No d. Scenic views and vistas? ❑ Yes ® No e. Other unique resources? ❑ Yes ® No If yes, describe the resource and identify any project - related impacts on the resource. Describe any measures to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. Archaeological, historical, or architectural resources Information from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) has been obtained and is contained in Appendix B. Based on the SHPO database review, there are no archaeological sites or historic structures identified in the Gateway Study Area. Due to the lack of water bodies and lack of viewshed, it is unlikely that this area would contain any archaeological resources. A preliminary heritage resource assessment was completed by Edina's Preservation Consultant for the Pentagon Towers and Quads sites. The summary of the findings are included in Appendix B. These findings indicate that the Pentagon Towers and Quads are an early example of a planned office park in the Twin Cities and that these sites have the potential for consideration as a heritage resource to Edina. The information states that the Pentagon Towers and Quads sites have Modemist- influenced architectural and landscape components. While it is anticipated that these structures do not represent the only remaining example of this style, due to the consideration for these sites as a potential heritage resource to Edina, additional documentation of the Pentagon Towers and Quads sites should be provided prior to redevelopment the sites. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 108 of 115 Prime or unique farmlands The Gateway Study Area is currently fully developed and not utilized for agricultural purposes. Designated parks, recreation areas, or trails Fred Richards Golf Course is a public golf course operated by Edina immediately north of the Gateway Study Area. The golf course is not anticipated to be impacted as a result of the proposed redevelopment scenarios. Trails and sidewalks are addressed in Item 21. Scenic views and vistas There are no significant views or vistas within the Gateway Study Area. Nearby Resources Mitigation Plan • Prior to redevelopment of the Pentagon Towers and Quads sites that would require razing of the existing structures, an evaluation and documentation of the historical and architectural significance of the sites will be needed by the project proposer. This information shall be submitted to Edina by the project proposer. 26. VISUAL IMPACTS. Will the project create adverse visual impacts during construction or operation? Such as glare from intense lights, lights visible in wilderness areas and large visible plumes from cooling towers or exhaust stacks? ❑ Yes N No If yes, explain. Only routine visual impacts associated with construction of typical commercial and residential land uses are anticipated by redevelopment within the Study Area. Building heights have the potential to range from one to 14 stories, depending on the type of land use. If the proposed building heights do not meet Edina City Code, a variance from the requirements will need to be obtained from the project proposer or the developer could seek to change the City Code. Visual Impacts Mitigation Plan • If components of a proposed project exceed Edina City Code requirements, variances from the City's requirement will need to be applied for by the developer. The City will review these variance requests and make a determination as to the approval or denial of the project as part of the review process. A project proposer could also seek to amend the City Code. This request would also be reviewed by the City. 27. COMPATIBILTY WITH PLANS AND LAND USE REGULATIONS. Is the project subject to an adopted local Comprehensive Plan, land use plan or regulation, or other applicable land use, water, or resource management plan of a local, regional, state or federal agency? N Yes ❑ No If yes, describe the plan, discuss its compatibility with the project and explain how any conflicts will be resolved. If no, explain. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 109 of 115 Existing Conditions Edina has an existing Comprehensive Plan that was completed in 1999. Of the four scenarios developed as part of this Final AUAR, Scenario 2, Scenario 3, and Scenario 4 would each require modifications to the Comprehensive Plan to allow the land uses that are being proposed. Redevelopment under Scenario 1 can be completed without a Comprehensive Plan amendment. Edina's existing Comprehensive Plan is in conformance with the requirements of Minnesota Rule 4410.3610, subpart 1. Any Comprehensive Plan amendments or updates would need to be in conformance with the requirements of Minnesota Rules 4410.3610, subp. 1. Edina is in the process of updating its Comprehensive Plan during 2007. This Plan is expected to be completed by early 2008, and will be in conformance with the Metropolitan Land Planning Act requirements. The Comprehensive Plan update could include the land uses outlined in any of the scenarios analyzed in the AUAR. Redevelopment within the Gateway Study Area is subject to the standards, policies, regulations, and ordinances approved by Edina. These plans include: • City of Edina Comprehensive Plan • City of Edina Comprehensive Water Supply Plan • City of Edina Comprehensive Sewer Plan • City of Edina Comprehensive Transportation Plan • City of Edina Water Resource Management Plan • City of Bloomington Water Supply Plan • Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Plan Impacts of Development Scenarios 1 through 4 Scenario 1: Scenario 1 represents Edina's existing Comprehensive Plan (1999). The densities analyzed in this scenario represent the average density allowed by the Comprehensive Plan. No Comprehensive Plan amendments or updates would be necessary for redevelopment to proceed as outlined in this scenario. Scenario 2: Scenario 2 contains a "master plan" scenario submitted by an interested Developer. The Developer is planning to redevelop the Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quads site as shown in Figure 5 -3. This scenario would.require these two areas of the Gateway Study Area to be rezoned for mixed use development that includes senior residential, commercial, retail, office space, as well as a hotel. These land uses are consistent with other areas immediately adjacent to the Developer's parcels on the west, south, and north. Due to the introduction of residential land use, a Comprehensive Plan amendment would be required. All other uses in the Gateway Study Area would remain the same as Scenario 1. Scenario 3: Scenario 3 involves converting the Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quads site noted in Scenario 2 to commercial use. All other uses in the Gateway Study Area would remain the same as Scenario 1. According to the Edina City Code, a Planned Commercial City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 110 of 115 District and a Planned Office District have the same, requirements for density. A commercial district generally has more retail space, which will result in the need for a Comprehensive Plan amendment. Scenario 4: Scenario 4 involves converting the Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quads sites to some office with more residential land uses. All other uses in the Gateway Study Area would remain the same as Scenario 1. This scenario represents more residential uses within the Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quads site and would require a Comprehensive Plan amendment for these areas. For Scenarios 2, 3, and 4 that would require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, the process is a two -step process through the Planning Commission, Zoning Board of Appeals and Edina City Council. The first step would be an application for a comprehensive guide plan change, rezoning, preliminary development plan, and variances if needed. This process would take 90 -120 days. It would include the following meetings: 1. Review and recommendation by the Planning Commission on the guide plan change, rezoning and preliminary development plan. 2. Review and final action on variances by the Zoning Board of Appeals. 3. Review and final action by the Edina City Council on the guide plan change, rezoning and preliminary development plan. The second step would be a final development plan review. This step would take another 60 -120 days. This would include the following meetings: 1. Review and recommendation by the Planning Commission. 2. Review and final action by the Edina City Council. Plan Compatibility Mitigation Plan • The proposed change in land use of Scenarios 2, 3, and 4. at the Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quads site will require a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. 28. IMPACT ON INFRASTRUCTURE AND PUBLIC SERVICES. Will new or expanded utilities, roads, other infrastructure or public services be required to serve the project? ® Yes ❑ No If yes, describe the new or additional infrastructure or services needed. (Note: any infrastructure that is a connected action with respect to the project must be assessed in the EAW; see EAW Guidelines for details.) City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 111 of 115 Municipal Sewer, Water, Storm Water. and Transportation Services Edina intends to provide municipal services to the area. This municipal infrastructure includes sanitary sewer, water, storm water management and transportation improvements. These items are discussed in the previous items as indicated: • Municipal Water System Improvements — See Item 13 • Storm Water Management Improvements — See Item 17 • Sanitary Sewer Improvements — See Item 18 • Transportation System Improvements — See Item 21 Police and Fire Department Redevelopment in this area will also have an impact on social services such as schools, police, fire, and community activities. Edina has its own police and fire department with approximately 30 full -time firefighters, 14 volunteer paid -on -call firefighters, and approximately 39 police officers. These services will be provided to the Gateway Study Area. School System The Gateway Study Area is located within Independent School District #273. Since the major type of residential units being proposed are for senior citizens, no significant impact on the increase in the number of students within the School District is anticipated. 29. CUMULATIVE IMPACTS. Minn. R. 4410.1700, subp. 7, item B requires that the RGU consider the "cumulative potential effects of related or anticipated future projects" when determining the need for an environmental impact statement. Identify any past, present or reasonably foreseeable future projects that may interact with the project described in this EAW in such a way as to cause cumulative impacts. Describe the nature of the cumulative impacts and summarize any other available information relevant to determining whether there is potential for significant environmental effects due to cumulative impacts (or discuss each cumulative impact under appropriate items) elsewhere on this form). The Gateway Study Area and its surroundings are within a first -ring suburb of Minneapolis that is generally fully developed. Cumulative impacts will generally be driven by either individual parcel redevelopment or area -wide redevelopment. To analyze cumulative impacts for the Gateway Study Area, information from both Edina and Bloomington was obtained related to known or approved redevelopment projects within or near the TH 100 and I -494 area. Table 29- 1 summarizes the known redevelopment plans in the area and Figure 29 -1 shows the location of these projects. This Final AUAR includes these redevelopment projects in the analysis throughout the document to analyze the cumulative impacts of redevelopment in the area. Within Edina, there are five areas that have approved redevelopment plans. These include the Cypress Development, the Target site, the Westin site, York Place Development, and TE Miller Development. These redevelopments will create an additional net increase of 86,750 square feet of retail and office space and add a hotel and 165 units of condominiums /apartments. To the City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 112 of 115 south of the Gateway Study Area, a number of parcels are undergoing redevelopment within Bloomington. These projects will redevelop into a number of office, commercial, retail, restaurants, hotel, and parking facilities. While there are no other known specific projects, additional redevelopment activities in the vicinity of the Gateway Study Area, mainly to the west, south, and east, can reasonably be expected. This area of the Twin_ Cities experienced significant growth during the 1960's, and as buildings become older, their functions become obsolete in a changing socioeconomic environment. As businesses continue to improve their facilities to meet customer demands, older buildings become less attractive options for purchase or rental of office space. As such, these buildings are removed and replaced with newer buildings. As the general population of Edina continues to age, there will be an increasing need for senior housing, especially in mixed -use developments where acquisition of personal goods and services do not require driving. Edina is a first -ring suburb and the general redevelopment in infill in the City is anticipated. The cumulative impact of this redevelopment is outlined below: • Since redevelopment within Edina would occur in areas that are currently developed, minimal impact on wildlife resources is expected as part of any cumulative impacts. • New storm water management regulations will affect most future redevelopment that were not required when areas were developed in the 1960's and as such, improved storm water treatment can be anticipated. • Upgrades to existing municipal sewer and water infrastructure may be needed with redevelopment in the infill area, but this would need to be analyzed on a case -by -case basis. • Improvements to the transportation infrastructure are likely to also be needed to accommodate the growing commuting population in the area. Edina is updating its Transportation Plan to. plan for future redevelopment and transportation needs. Additionally, N 4n/DOT has long -term plans to reconstruct I -494 and TH 100 interchange. It is likely that other redevelopment in the regional area will reflect similar land uses as presented in this report. Depending on the redevelopment size, the need to acquire zoning variances or rezoning, and the adjacent infrastructure facilities, additional study may be necessary to address future impacts as a result of these future redevelopment scenarios. While potential future redevelopment within Bloomington along the I -494 corridor may occur, there are no specific approved plans for that area other than those included in the AUAR analysis already. Edina cannot speculate on future Bloomington redevelopment for this area that is not currently approved or certain. However, it is anticipated that redevelopment will likely have an impact on the transportation infrastructure in both cities. Therefore, to address potential cumulative impacts associated with growth on the transportation system, Edina will work with City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 113 of 115 Bloomington and potentially participate in a regional traffic study that will assist in anticipating future potential redevelopment within the TH 100/I -494 ,area and plan for infrastructure improvements. Table 29 -1. Current Adiacent Redevelopment Proposals City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 114 of 115 Develo •»ienl Siimmaiy of Imp acts . Duke -Weeks Realty Phase 1 Completed, Phase 2 to add 332,000 ft2 of office space by 2008. Phase 3 and Limited Partnership Phase 4 have not received approval Walser Real Estate Proposed Development Approved for 207,500 ft2 of office space and 86,000 ft2 of II, LLC retail. Recently expanded to surface parking lot for car dealer inventory. United Properties Addition of 200,000 ft2 f medical office space approved for expansion by 2008. Bloomington Ryan Companies Approved 750,000 ft2 of office space. 240,000 ft2 has been constructed. Resubmittal US, Inc. for Phase 2 and Phase 3 anticipate a reduced total of 697,000 ft2 Mortenson Development, Inc. 256 room hotel and adjoining restaurant currently under construction Nm Investstmentsnts, , L LC 122 space parking ramp to meet demand for existing offices United Properties 285,000 square foot office building at 8200 Norman Center Drive Cypress Properties Redevelopment of 40,000 ft2 of a movie theater to 86,000 ft2 f retail development Target Approved increase of retail space from 154,000 ft2 to 196,500 ft2 by 2008. Edina Westin Approved construction of an 18 story building with 79 condominiums, a 225 room hotel, and 7,000 fe restaurant York Place Development Approved construction of 49,000 ft2 of retail space and 86 senior apartments. Replaces 52,750 112 of office space. TE Miller Development (7380 Net increase of 2,000 gsf of office space France Office) City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 114 of 115 Cumulative Impacts Mitigation Plan • Edina will work with Bloomington and potentially participate in a regional traffic study that I ill assist in anticipating future potential redevelopment within the TH 100/1 -494 area and plan for infrastructure improvements. Edina will also coordinate with other, entities to address cumulative impacts. These items have been 'addressed in other areas of the AUAR and include mitigation plan items Dl, D6, E8, F1, and F1 30. OTHER POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS. If the project may cause any adverse environmental: impacts not addressed by items 1 to 28, identify and discuss them. here, along with any proposed mitigation. There are no other potential environmental impacts known at this time. City of Edina Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review September 2007 Page 115 of 115 APPENDIX 0 lie 0 \ k. f. - *ate + `� �� �� 1! •',• �` v +' •. .sue- � ' , �� ,� , .. n � - �1,� === — ,c -,. � �i '�� li 12 Awc qw � ' y,,,, / / ti � t T I ^ • � � •'. t � / .tom � Ij � J ' � C•;Jr v �- i 1 f� ,� y J "�'' ', • 52 4L Al v •� T •' I �� ' yY • * , i , I , I of - -I � ^,+ Figure 5 -1 Legend Location Map . a° Project Location Gateway AUAR 0 4 8 N - Miles WSB ,�Oth �►.. i .vs� r • r �, • \ ,.. .• sr MINE, 17, -Y� 1-1 Pa W vjszz� fO ._ 8th'St'W - — i a t" - - =:: WEElm inn so a ��!] J i m CL OWN -` L Eh&AN _ Lice end Gateway Study Area Figure 5 -2 Q N USGS Location Map 'v, a Gateway AUAR N - 0 500 1,000 WSB Feet s A A-06.fes, MC �� Figure 5 -3 Le end " o e f Gateway AUAR Study Area .�.a o 500 1,000 Aerial Location Map Pentagon Quads F eet WSB Gateway AUAR Penta g on Towers LANG UK ntaiaunaw LAND USE PLAN o�w�r CITY OF ED I NA, MINNESOTA �'=�: �• own un s w.e ou s � ui, n swear r..�.� rw I � PoLle to w Im nisva w \ i u sspr •r ,�r iwwu � •r sw rmrr R � t ,. 7 31 t-=m i �^� nrtmsnn nt Figure 5 -4 Existing Land Use Map GatewayAUAR _ z ' 70TH S7 W� •.•+•w sww �I.r tee" �; ) ` `�� :�' - � •� I l a - - - �M�+ R• • .f rr AL N.'. If Ul -M f QZQ s +.► C I• d. ~ y i 1. 1 2.14 Ac i 15,000 GSF Non -Res 31,000 GSF Res (36 Units) ti' - - "76TH ST,W 20.84 Ac 544,700 GSF Non -Res 6.59 Ac a 27.03 Ac •• 143,600 G _ 8.00 Ac 589,000 GSF Non -Res �; Y y Non -Res I r f 174,200 GSF a a _ - 12.08 Ac ,lNon -Res TI{ sT w_':.'_�s'�`� --a`. = =- - 264,000 GSF 28.75 A 5,700 GSF N s� on -Res 751,400 GSF Non- _ - �� s �, � -• �.., � - . MINNESOTA DRIVE _ - -- • •• o Ir "fir' r'� _ --� e � :s��" - .�v � .:,�•q.� r T ••� .l .�t � - Ar -: ' - AMERICAN BLVD W - - - .. Z Y r • n . j O t I ter- y7 7# L of �m t - FF r l Vts 84TH ST W Figure 6 -1 Legend - t Cel atewayAUAR QGatewayAUAR POD-1 500 1,��� W.70 GPCD 3 Scenario 1: - PID - POD -2 Feet r.mmnrPhensive Plan ' GSF = Gross Square Feet II.Ir Word- �• - a y A_ i . J {y c �! r �r E t _ is =M� I .0 PARKLAWN A ��...�rR " ;:. I►. 2.14 Ac 15,000 GSF Non -Res `j1� 1ur 1 iz 31,000 Res _ }u '• • i- (36 Units) P r 20.84 Ac 1 76TH S .w - i Z 700 GSF Non Res 6.59 Ac 4* . i 27.03 Ac 3 143,600 G 8.00 Ac 213,000 GSF Non -Res Non -Res , 2' Nk� 1 4,200 GSF 883,000 GSF Residential Jon -Res " 1 (820 Units) '` 12.08 q 77TH sT w _ 17.25 ALA' r . ,115,000 GSF No 700 GSF No e5'' , Incl. 150 Room H4 Minnesota Drive --------- - - - - -- �.. • -. y - o i AME kICAN' BLVD �� r i,. .; -" •'�� 1/ —_ ter! ,.. -� x•11 � ,. . -r 1 i t. 1 4 r f E S Mb- oft Uj 84TH ST W - i._ Figure 6 -2 Legend - aa Gateway AUAR Q Gateway AUAR POD -1 PCD -3 0 500 1,000 WJB Scenario 2: Feet � � PID � POD -2 PSR -4 ,,,,, ,_ s Master Plan GSF - Gross Square Feet I Lu ■ W. ...r � ... i, %� PARK�AWN AVE +Q•���LL�#IF'w'� y +• 2.14 AC Vest Sno ►xI�w. s. 15,000 GSF Non -Res - 31,000 GSF Res - 1 (36 Units) ' 1 • � 76TH ST W > 20.84 Ac ` 544,700 G5F Non -R113,600 6.59 Ac -= y 27.03 Ac • , . { 8.00 Ac 140,000 GSF Non -Res G = 174,200 GSF 1,240,000 GSF Residential Non -Res +i . on -Res (1,200 Units) a t ` 12.08 AC --77TH ST•W- - - - - -- �. 260,000 GSF Non- es 2 17.25 Ac 'r 310,000 GSF Resk0ential00 7.d 7 F Non -Res (300 Units) J6 iPl — ✓ azr .- c ` •,. - • - - Minnesota Drive - - -- - -=�- - W . - - - y. - ""• -+ 78TH AMERICAN BLVD D W -• -tea- fir•.. - _,,_ { Jim Or LU it •� - 'rs ,w�rRf. Ladd :ti.{ i x 6•' a Z �! L, .� 84TH ST W Figure 6 -4 Legend 0 MDD -5 POD -1 PCD -3 Q Gateway AUAR 0 500 1 000 WSB Gateway AUAR - PID - POD -2 PSR-4 Feet Ir/ -Jo Scenario 4 a r,.ndoe, 1- GSF = Gross Square Feet tow Ar via I Lu ■ W. ...r � ... i, %� PARK�AWN AVE +Q•���LL�#IF'w'� y +• 2.14 AC Vest Sno ►xI�w. s. 15,000 GSF Non -Res - 31,000 GSF Res - 1 (36 Units) ' 1 • � 76TH ST W > 20.84 Ac ` 544,700 G5F Non -R113,600 6.59 Ac -= y 27.03 Ac • , . { 8.00 Ac 140,000 GSF Non -Res G = 174,200 GSF 1,240,000 GSF Residential Non -Res +i . on -Res (1,200 Units) a t ` 12.08 AC --77TH ST•W- - - - - -- �. 260,000 GSF Non- es 2 17.25 Ac 'r 310,000 GSF Resk0ential00 7.d 7 F Non -Res (300 Units) J6 iPl — ✓ azr .- c ` •,. - • - - Minnesota Drive - - -- - -=�- - W . - - - y. - ""• -+ 78TH AMERICAN BLVD D W -• -tea- fir•.. - _,,_ { Jim Or LU it •� - 'rs ,w�rRf. Ladd :ti.{ i x 6•' a Z �! L, .� 84TH ST W Figure 6 -4 Legend 0 MDD -5 POD -1 PCD -3 Q Gateway AUAR 0 500 1 000 WSB Gateway AUAR - PID - POD -2 PSR-4 Feet Ir/ -Jo Scenario 4 a r,.ndoe, 1- GSF = Gross Square Feet TV I �* a v W 7th St. W 3. IT r Minnesota Drive A L E 8 6_.,St,,W� A Impervious Surface = 110.47 Ac o Pervious Surface = 21.3 Pond 3.2 Ac Gateway AUAR Study Area r r. f, a- I ti Figure 10-1 1 A Existing Conditions Cover Type Map 0 500 1.000 WSB Gateway AUAR Feet <<. Figure 12 -1 Legend N Souro : MnDNR &NN9 �e,' A )_ . Wetlands Map DNR Public Waters/Wetlands 0 500 1,000 WSB - Gatewa AUAR NWI Wetlands Feet Y 5 & Associates, Inc. 8 3 sou. : Mos Figure 13 -1 N A °r a Well Location Map & DWSMA WSB v, a 0 500 1,000 ~-� Gateway AUAR Feet 5 & Ass"Wes. Inc. +W y, ' I1 a rt m I { _ a '� ■f ✓ _ l4C rkl t. a ve s'��ri �• • NMS 11 A _ty �w�► a• -.e - � -.. '�'.}I'I ".S -- 3'7"x"' - 1 # _� •C.�.. i r <- - � , , • + Winnesota.Drive .. Legend _ Manholes Surcharged During 10 -year Frequency Event t v. ED Gateway AUAR Study Area ► Existing Storm Sewerar w South Pond Subwatershed Nine -Mile Creek South Subwatershed " SExisting Ponding Areas 1AFr N Source: EcIns Wafer Resource Management Plan Figure 17 -1 A 0 500 1,000 Subwatershed Map Feet WSB Gateway AUAR S Source: NRCS Figure 19 -1 N A e Hydrologic Soils Group WSB r ° 0 500 1,000 Ga teway A UA R mmmmmm==== Feet S & Associates. lnc. Source: NRCS Figure 19 -2 N A °4 a Soils Map WSB �3 a 0 500 1,000 Gateway AUAR mmmmmm7== Feet ��so- S Foe K `01686- Od`GIS Maps`J=g71- 1_I(ey liversecoms — Jun 06 211011053 31 W w91 A. Figure 21 -1 e Key Intersections o a Gateway AUAR N S 0 500 1,000 2,000 Feet Legend O Key Intersection Gateway AUAR Study Area WSB & Associates. inc. I a a ry a 0 4 0 V ^O O 47 ryb by �E up a v vm o� r� k � � #���� -�. ��• lilt >s s s � �� f �t � . !_ Il o ` � a lv' CO CD to CO to _� O ti Q1 r F •�� W LO LO CD �" _ - �,� N M ° 410 1� ° 1- 2 v `� L_ 91 (67 633 (374) I *yt 2 (344) P� H- 265 (58 + AL .Z 93(191) � 2( 14 O ��109 (347) I 464(829) —1 h?� _ - # ' Edina Industrial Boulevard 1 r * t I! l! IK 1 1 1 %r , ► //• It:n,ll,i 1i 104 30 ( 97) _ • FAI ' i t.fir�ri /SP*1M} 144 (� 46� 33 I dip ,. s 78th Street 1* . .. 8L:- $7 ti 156), �. < r � Q � .... fly... -► - � v 0 1 a, '� =• � N Co rr -PAW—. - - - 457 (402 200 (55g� _ '. • i N rjf Figure 29 -2 e Existing (2007) Vehicular Turn Movements ..T Gateway AUAR i• 124 (524) 1 - 1137 (931) —4 1 103 (102) -Z I I► r I�� �, .. �a M N M �l 4�7311% j05) �+ SAJ 37 85 ( 1' West 77th Street 7 19) 11 qr S =+c 21 tMINNESOiA '! —t 1p 76 rp c #L- 7( 4) i 0 UtAw w. C- 321 (1151) �- 23 (524) 7 ( 5) 1309 (931) —) - 78 (102) a k ITS,nr° -Y.. IA/t%n B Assoc- 0 a b U C, o� o� N O� NO bk v of v o c y a� h o� '� ; •s' � � v � o 1 t s 111 - z. uw r AO Ln t@x . 11� 1-- 262 (157) , "r'uliy,; a+ ►�'+d't� t� P 90 (199) West 76th Street ; a % •' +" `34 (174) ht - -- of :► ' 88 (481) ---4 1 1 c# . 41 (249) N � � Gov Ln C14 Cn M" Il. !R �-�rt. �. •• rrr M L 28 ( 17) �i`i.ar'1v!(� -.d ti , ,��w:- •� . 171 (308) r 0( 0) % I CA (508) 1 � � � � } "a � m k{ A 413 (520) —� O'iM "'' • 0 0 0 LO N N t 159 (217,y "• I t 22 ( 53) �— 79 q 4 (— 160 (130) Q 43) .si. .td t 117 (295) r �. on' G % Minnesota Drive ; b `` 23 (108) 1 '"r's,�►' 1 (40) 1 134 (340) ". M • it 6 t R 5 (50) ..f 83 (300) v v co N M 0 � 1rr O > �v Q o M N .tom- 48 (265) C 4 289 ( 77) 333 (236)a p - 7! f - /7. 55 (119) 1 N n r. N M { , 2 105 (673) —Z Vir fill �. ]r1(4,7r��,h Street �rw... fit- M _ I • I r - it co LEGEND 1 xxOM AM (PM) PEAK HOUR 696 (338) r xxom TURNING MOVEMENTS .z 736 (483) Z O• � LANE GEOMETRY � ,, � � r 1t STOP TRAFFIC CONTROL ��- Figure 29 -3 e Existing (2007) Vehicular Turn Movements Gateway AUAR �v rrr N r I 0 y WSB & Associates, Inc. N b IL' Li Y -. L Rp l I• o cl 9 0 "v^ 00 in N M t 416 (137) t 71 (422) a " 153 (91 ° r+ t' 4-- 751 (4685) I� 1-- 764 (453) I I (— 395 (76 q Y1 t 33 ( 13) P r' 94 (103) 14 r 36 ( 12) 0 111 (352) 127 ( 539)1 �'' ---• `� � - - � 5 9 (835) --4 1 I 1 0 1181 (1016�Z I�I _ s►, . -. ' o,��`�L��'` � \ ems-• � O �' M't 32 X w 0i 590 124 5 k" N D N ._ r Edina Industrial Boulevard 'o —'v ..' ." 3 `r l" 1 ( C * West 77th Str eet rV� ��` •It a Y1+ O /� st i1 w 1 `51I' _` ". ' 1057) � 31 IT •. y ,IN ri I'vcr, -�.- t fit t y j1 F� � • �� � - �+ w+� 1 U . J },► •,�r:si � � - [MINNESOTA % " C (155) O •� 1P ¢: r i • , . ` - .tlRfl4�. Q ^1 l• • JI i yf •.�. • o SZ $tf�t 3'+i -r r ,r �� - V 10� lobs Jlp ^ �•`I alb - {• ' - , �rli ► 1 / ti r � � 1 45 ( ` "� • .. t low C s 3) ' 1" k 41 ( 10) . t 48 8 (83)-f r 1 42 ( 1 034) - 120 50) 61 335) '1 y p � -• it •� N S Nom'- - • N a ' • PIT illillilillilljlllllllliiiiiiiiiiI Vw � y r W) _ _ >I N _ J co m � ll - • I L 512 (427) .tom 203 (564) V o ow���y Figure 21 -5 o e _ Scenario 1 (2014) Vehicular Turn Movements v Gateway AUAR LEGEND '� xxcxx' AM (PM) PEAK HOUR � xx axT xxTxxT TURNING MOVEMENTS OLANE GEOMETRY ST01 TRAFFIC CONTROL � -- " N(D� 44 wise '- dl� West 76th treet { , z 18 ( 66) _ 1— 327 (171 t n 99 3) "� � � 47 (224) 123 (623) -� 1 57 (320) Z '" N1 M 0 *q*.,, C4 LO (� , r- tTT LO l f x W- '� .0 _`Irk `J 0 L 38 ( 21) 296 (4260) 0 ( 0) 549 (716) .,':''tal``. ', � m M 0( 1) ;M� «:�iRlfji t MN)N LL ar QLT � .r.. r F Z► o o LO 0000 M t 281 (243) t 22 ( 54) 80 ( 4) ? ,tee 1 1— 212 (146) Jim 54) 119(299) .. ' iwir► +ra !a •A . Minnesota Drive : td • s' 4 law. ' 1 (41 T 1 �i 1. 38 sa) 1 T1 a `11W'Q*. 4 •t d 1 93 ) .. ,» . OUR t (75) ---� 4 124 ( ) -Z IVA ON ( irj Q (Ai o v t 550 (287) o °' `' H— 326 ( 84) # 0 B ,L. r 355 (259) 0 '� • °r 't`� ~_ i7 �' 61 (1 58) 1 �� 119 (765) 04 TTi N N 1. it t es 7th Street ` •_ 111 ' T j C" , 1 (D -loin LEGEND ^I NEW b a 0 U O O b O� N O 41 Y o� v, _ v u� h 03 :d. "`("O" AM (PM) PEAK HOUR 1♦ 763 (362) 1 ! X.K(XX) TURNING MOVEMENTS 786 (530) Z LANE GEOMETRY STOP TRAFFIC CONTROL � }, ) r IL 1b �iiz �4L 1L.. yi wo'S A� Figure 21 -6 j e Scenario 1 (2014) Vehicular Turn Movements rJ• Gateway AUAR T (c ti N TiiT 1J WSR & Associates. Inc • _ X11 aw S W p w co 9 � is n .ar T h • �� O NONE MOC M r `� N •1 CO r CO � �' M t 416 (i37) = t 76 (469) a r' L 174 (1016) 1— 834 (542) III 846 (510) I I ('— 379 ( 761) ,. 33 ( 13) 1'19 r 94 (103) r 14 196 ( 63) O �r �, _ • q 1r 111 ( 352) 1, h? 127 ( Lo I I 539) 691 (1054) 1537 (1203) ATr 35) O 341 146)Z a _• 3 2 ( 5 •d = N �J a Industrial Boulevard �ry`o�� N t C"o • =J49 ( 72) r -•iw: .; rn _ ` West 77th Street i 010. ,•w , O ,„ (� t+ l " + `5�P j _ .. 49(1462) —) h ?j� f O y, Y� rrlM iriN(I:.:,ii.i ;E O . • 5( 91)Z 1 I F 1/ - +7 to ( ! U ...Jt �re r- MINNESOTA M 1' 7 O + co _ .. , , o ..CIA ft 98 1) r == :3 Q w w 3 ) a - > + • .� ► (155) .� �• : tF �i� ..� s+l -� `� • , . �� '7•r" ' '- ► rw ''' *rte �. O I / il;o� 1 • n • i i 1 i It . • .. m t 78th Street 17 ... cj ey Srr ri "" •°• i° d� ''� 12 ( ' 14) rs �. .. ,•- •' s / 707(l ' T op i 48 ( 83) T 201 ( 39) 0111111 - 1604 (1315)---+ '`�1►, + r 1 (16 -1) ; • . - d �. 316 ( 110)Z �:• Nip ;' 45 ( 5 �, III rvw � ► 3 ) � or7 � r• _ � ► y''�' 'a. . � V•, t- • cu r . _• i� cu 010 4W, 0 141) � N � CD _ $!` 555 (480 }� 203 (564) LEGEND ol 4— r - p ' 1 4� • r— xx� AM (PM) PEAK HOUR -91 N 1 ` _ •+ ` . ,r xx(xx) TURNING MOVEMENTS a # t 4w - '�� LANE GEOMETRY a �• •% [STOP TRAFFIC CONTROL l ... r rye _ IL "G S A Figure 21 -7 e << _ }= Scenario 2 (2014) Vehicular Turn Movements wSB v Gateway AUAR wm m"e• o� 3 ,'ISSOCIOIPS, Inc. O N ct 0 0 0 c `o O i jr rw1c, j 21F. W 44f Nor 9 38� West 76th�Street , ' .r _•�. AL 58 (2$5) t, Fi 152 (709) 71 (365) v r m wco v N W) -4 tD ° `O 38 ( 21) 9rF.#* 4'. .. z w .� 400 (460)'t*.. f �1 O £� 1111 , _ 431 (885) 1 11 I ,... �,.: 628 (867) --1 v V 'mss' 0 0 o Lo 0000 t 391 (285) t L 22 ( 54) 80 ( 4) 1 1-- 248 (172) O I I 76,( 52) r 119 (299) 14 PP Minnesota Drive d 45 183) 1 (41) 1 �' 237(516) —) I�I ' -mss•, . 5 (51) Z ^ . _ 151 (514) Z m V) . a, 7 N•a'r- LON �r a }tt _• Q °r°v v°oa -` 584 (296) { H-- 326( 84) K J 1� t. . L r 355 (259) o - _ IT 61 (158) 00 0 119 (765) C-4 -4 m� w CD 00 West 78th Street N LEGEND AM (PM) PEAK HOUR 'r a 797 (365) 1 r xx(X) TURNING MOVEMENTS 786 (530) Z 00 LANE GEOMETRY N ITT STOP TRAFFIC CONTROL sr ' .,. �.., r r qM r��^% Figure 21 -8 0 7 J e �o ! Scenario 2 (2014) Vehicular Turn Movements � r n •..�� Gateway AUAR I F A WCQ & Associates, Inc. -2 Igo W WA 0 40&-, --adlWANK ;(D W (WO,* �a -4W 00000 CO V) 41 V In 188(13 In ' 04 6(137) \78 (609) 856 (709) I I, 868 (678) 497 (11 33 ( 13) 94(103) 115( 31) jr t LO 111 ( 352)--.a- 127 539)--.1- 1001 (1126)---4 2409 (1316)---► 9( 261 127)—l- 446" 32( 5) C14 to CO 0 CD a) 79( 1196 7) 7 169( 53) Edina Industrial Boulevard C4 CO LO CO 04 OK - . a I West 77th Street A* 2373 (1478 it tj 297( 53 &MINNESOTA low. Ul) T. W • O 32 106 0( 98 1$4 (180 4 W3 (1651)11 .,Vim ii mnw @ :3 OL E 78tt) 00 0 Street C) A 4W JolW W. VW kP 12 ( 14) '702 (2312) a vs f 121( 21) O, 48 83)---t J� W 2754 (1384)--+ O 145 0 6 1) 218( 72)4— OW (3 t.13- L I T r Mr C4 CD Y 01 -j C A U) Cn pr 689 (507) 203 (564) %. LEGEND p A.- A* 7 z 70 o CO Do Figure 21 -9 Scenario 3 (2014) Vehicular Turn Movements Gateway AUAR ,�A-Z- A I A Ir% P1 & Associales, Inc. 18 ( 66) III 568 (216) '� r'� �; � rr ���►�'s � P+9 �99 3) West 76th treet •� 9,,, 160 (962) —+ �� F• 74 (496) "Z -.... Q i o°o aoi c(0 m v a N t 38 ( 21) rrx�r Il� 749 (482) r 0 ( 0) 650 (1311) IV — '�' :yL�r — :— m Z. ` IL 0( 1) _ —w r M i.lii If e i O O C%4 LL W - 1 00 M L 733 (306) 22 ( 54) ; r �— 80 ( 4) 'z 360 (185) J14 r ,78 ( 52) • 4 _ .�19 (299) r . - r G , Minnesota Drive -7 -: S.* 1 41 .� C • 249 (695 7 ' t as 1 .t 2 (51) C_ +`, 159 (723) Z _v 00 L0 ... 4a r ItF: 7 "pr N r i r III C14 IT .� -T# > vt NNM Q °r° a i t 690 (301) Lo o H— 326 ( 84) S En 11 0 _C (9 __ L _,AAp, I L IL _ y � - i = 1 - ~ -_ ■1 � 61 (158) � oo � w+ _ 119 (765) N� CD W } r �.� . _ 4ft'� I ' yf - •♦ v w+• �� Vor F 711 - %•w a(1(�h Street ��-, ;, - • - _ _ 111 r L N to LEGEND �- ,A; �s is b r xxi NObyO03 d u � m � C O D E u O 0 N b q'li Aw '2 !�, s o qw N�{p co h O f N M n r j �M - 1! L 416 (137) r e � 187 (842 %3 858 (4 Y r 7 L 13) 94 (1Q3 38 (30) ' — `� �' _ „-► o,\ I I o , Q h I �►.` r \ o 500 (1035) � 1207 (1213) 111 ( 352) 127 ( 539)_S > g ( ) t 184 ( 127) Z oa�s ... 1 e. o ... -1/ Nmco 4 L_ 32( 5) a) w �r •s O� �6� \, �i.= N �° a ) `° ~ � gn (i 122) •ar_ ✓ e•w�er w ��` N N co . r W- 92 ( 92) Edina Industrial Boulevard West 77th Street ' r 121 ( 17)1 �Y Q8 (1204)---+ h? j) 1203 ( P o o� `' � Q •+. a :w r •♦ runuru • _ � p pA N •,ip.'► •' ��� j-IIX.t. w.i.• L.1).J1?,�nsi�t �MINNFSOIA ;,y �' ►Oe} �i .. • T , 8) • 33 (155 11P1ip � O : «.SIR , . r •. � � i t 78th Street �'t)� -. I m V 00 0 1k N U 72F I� •" tl' 617 (1406) C 44 0 'wo s 1367 (1193) '! " (16 j r, x 4 O 124 ( 72)�.r �e { >� h t �1 L �' 145 (335 r r , , ;y t.l .;#k * III T 7 w � ' W f _ , Wes' W) OO x N _.. Z:. ! A CM — AMMEMMA co t 472(478 ) ' h, 203 (564) s } LEGEND A; Figure 21 -11 ° e _ Scenario 4 (2014) Vehicular Turn Movements Gatewav AUAR A xx(cx) AM (PM) PEAK HOUR 4-- Xx (10L) r xx(xx) TURNING MOVEMENTS LANE GEOMETRY STOP TRAFFIC CONTROL WSB i !T �, rr, ' 111 u- •: ::, ��„� r H, W VIII 273 (199) .� , 99 ( 3) West 76th eet �y � 2 r. a 62 (204) htj� - 160 (569) ---) 1 I I i 74 (292) Z y co . � 1F N LO w rt III a t 27 ( 19) 1 r i x s- •[* . rt 7`- *r' I, 207 (461) 4 III 2— 0 ( 0) ¢ {-V � ti AF d i 654 (638) --j �j t =�1a1` m LL MOMf• .'..rii�i 000N �. a w Z+ O o o M M t 180 (283) • I L 22 ( 54) (� - F-- 80 ( 4) • . I 1— 180 (171) �J - F7*VJd 52) r 4 -Jr-- 119 (299) Minnesota Drive = 7 =• (7) 47 152) � �!► "!, r vr :' r .4 2 (5) � - 250 417) 159 (399) Z IT 5 51 ao cO m *Mfa* • y .. • w Nv \ a< m� m�m III Q °r°aM .-oo NAM .L 519 (296) a M � H-- 326 ( 84) 4 L 'i P • - _ . < + ram+ .355 (259) o O - -` `+� *SM i N O61 (158) 1 ao m 119 (765) N M Aw►� T. 41 n, A- Aw .,, Weg.7,pth Street *mo CO ` . ° N LO LEGEND 1 AM (PM) PEAK HOUR " " 731 (365) 1 xx(xx) TURNING MOVEMENTS , 786 (530) 1 LANE GEOMETRY N � 0 $ opj TRAFFIC CONTROL o # S' •t 1 ' /• 0 c Figure 21 -12 D L Scenario 4 (2014) Vehicular Turn Movements C c /SB L! Gateway AUAR v m eYr Associates. Inc. 0 g 0 O .O He �O mm 0 4. 4 m O 3 01— jqppw - - - — — -- I — --T.- - C , , I - _ YW r iE Nth LoM00 423 (1 ) w L 72 (427)' N t 154 1— 598 (2 ) I I �-- 615 (245) *R I I �— 399 Y♦4 '► 4 13) P y r 261 (319)_. pr 14 r 36 j) 113 (358) 129 ( 548) 1 �`— `'� 1 599 (925) � t� O 1462 (1063) �j t j� ° `O 9 ( 35) 183 ( 118)'Z I 1 I .i��, I # '5�,��� ��`.' �' Nr-r-m Lnwca 32( 5) �a�p\ in ►. ::ii" vv� v°° 1— 509 (1270)' . ..r ✓ lair , os�y�� °' _ -� v v �r, r 91 ( 43) r Edina Industrial Boulevard N `V West 77th Street �; Ai���,` r1�► Y alai ,�i r�' ! �: \ 3 ( _�`.� 0 0`0 �„ •d .4 Q al O . �' "•. `. " , •r f 1364 (1073)• -4 h +i Jr •y .J Y.:r • i'i �i �.. .� `511'• a" 202 ( 31)Z ' � t• ' i f � • ..r �MRJAESOiA f � 1 M O 6p �- � O •'� tz- :...1.4.14 ! :, - m C • (758) .,,„,,, ,► • "4 ; d 'fi'`'r `� r" ' - "� 0 CL s �► '"^. f•► >}� � "lrlir�• w.w.i� '�' j " � �`Ry;•O gl'r,f�.•t �r � O h ��Ii'S' 0 ry o °mow 78t Street '•• - ` 1 ��`, N , JWC a 7 501 (1562) O r :1: 41( 1 ) j ]� 49 ( 84)� 0 (164 t • t . j, 1665 (1050) —) �� �► 122 ( 51)� r 146 (340) r r 'l r h t TV _ •'7. (0 v ` _ CU N _ rn ri ) .r 206 567 (5674) ►0 N ' - • M S b 1" • •' LEGEND AM (PM) PEAK HOUR xx(xx) TURNING MOVEMENTS LANE GEOMETRY ;� STOP TRAFFIC CONTROL Figure 21 -13 e r Scenario 1 (2030) Vehicular Turn Movements wsB F Gatewa y A UAR �� .asso- P 0 H a w 0 g D 0 V Q ^O O m \O � Y D m m E � o C 4 m 4 m O � U')00 o , rr -�,,. ■ 111 0�� ': , N m r t_ 19 ( 67) 331 (172) .� aw ` 6) s ut } �14 r 101 (20 .� West 76thStreet `� ' "W = t _ . '98 ,�• _ , _ �. ' � j� Q > ' - t �.' ► 1 i; ",P '' � E i r � y t and �!1!f ► a(2t 2 7) --j 24 (631) —1 58 (321) Z D_ ONS a 39 ( 22 ) 2 0 425r ( ) 1 3 �. Q t, �. 382 (732) 1 "1 �' M m v°) C: r 556 (725) M� 'tMM V r O �► 0 0 o uoi a°io t` 166 (230) 23 (° 55) 8 4 215( 148) 52 ) 121 305 ~ A , Minnesota Drive 38 (166) 19 ,7) t ;25(4' Z 40 -► 26 --4 49 c Iry 6 no iii �. a) — O Q mcy)M cLR)$v t 558 291 o `- (-- 331 ( 85) All • o `11P -- \ : b : -9----361 263) - IT 62 (160) _ G--- 121 (777) ° iii fe • N N N Aft West 8th Street • , m rMi t (0 W) -. - N w _ LEGEND +►�. l as ■ AM (PM) PEAK HOUR , , ° 775 (368) 1 ,r xx(Xx) TURNING MOVEMENTS O 798 (538) Z i i O� LANE GEOMETRY _� :, � � � •. N TRAFFIC CONTROL �, N ... 0 C Figure 21 -14 Scenario 1 (2030) Vehicular Turn Movements WSB Gateway AUAR & a,.vo 0 0 o- �o °off �o � Y ti m E G � am 4 m 03 41P • Act S • 4 ++ I�N� NOON f' NMI L 423(139) n�� '�.t 77(474) NON 176 (10 647 {319) I H- 665 (287) � 462 ( 7) 13) +,• r 293 (334) P1Y r 196 { 63) A g 1 hrj� 113 ( 358) ' h�j� 129 ( 548)1 h? . , � 1 I I 6999 `1035; � III �' 1343 (1148)Z I I r o <° n�0 \ \/I vN N - W h N -- L 32 (. 5) ,ti\ �� \ ' •" C4 04 �D �- �— 847 (1174) '. a a LO N v '-r 250 ( 73) Edina Industrial Boulevard �`� % °, 0 " -- � nr) �IjII• •—+ � 4 `� 1 lYL% West 77th Street dw IT .L : _ a •. * �:..... �. f H , • • , • U i -, - MNNESOTA ^` �t 'j;k •` .� �i� Jrs K r L -. .rA 1 J t,*: "r gap Ho^ 78th Street t' �. • . t v _° N� AP ow dow.0 12 14) } .. 49 ( 84)1 712 (1571) 201( h o L • l� 1627 (1331) -4 ' 1 (164) O �{► 317 ( 111) � 3 r 146 (40) +� C O O Q] 11 t 562 (4a5) t 206 (574) ,-,t; • P. 1r I" r a :car, Figure 21 -15 r(e Scenario 2 (2030) Vehicular Turn Movements a Gateway AUAR yt - WSB &A'sadates, 1w. — 111 MN— OLOW 44 *4rL Vf �W' L 19 ( 67) �~-- 101 (206) West 76th Street 59 (258) --- h? j� 774 S 153 (717) 71 (369) r L • r- LO a a 11 0 N ,,► r ,, iii cO t 39 ( 22) r r x u' 0,410 .fiv r ~> 409 (467) 3 __ Oft lip > 7 436 (894) 636 876 _ ''LPL'/ -•.'� _• 0( �• .-. .-. `VD` +r •r .` ' `!F - (YAM ��� z' a s LO m a t 166 (230) L 23 ( 55) _ H-- 80 ( 4) 'z /— 251 (174) �► Il� r 78 52) ++�� r 121 (305) 3 D N a x b Q D U Q O Om ti b 01 Y o� � F c o C 4 4 0 O; 4 r � d: Minnesota Drive : C • M �' ( y 1 (41) 1 ' .ti 239 (522) - i rf�n.+�1 i 2 (76) —� , I�I 1 153 520 n co O (0 -le �. °v o v t 593 (301) o 331 ( 85) J ti i I' : e • % r _ 361 (263) _ 7TH � '". - �� f IR West 8th Street i 121 (777) 1 _ .. �.'. LEGEND xx'xx' x AM (PM) PEAK HOUR .-- x �xx� e. xx(xx) TURNING MOVEMENTS LANE GEOMETRY TRAFFIC CONTROL M M t(D n N fD J1 .1 Oj 809 (371) 1 798 (538) 4• r � d � Figure 21 -16 e Scenario 2 (2030) Vehicular Turn Movements Gateway AUAR A WSB R .iS.40- oa D 0 a 0 0 V Q O� � Y mm 0 << Zm m o °a V 1^" . -,* __j ..� ✓�L Edina Industrial Boulev< 11 f1_ .. • ' • � ��/ , ti - � .fir• �i ! � r "" • f � 3� y � l� 8 l 11) � 4ft. ��� ( • q % 8 ( 25 R J - _ hz _ 7 t � 'f jj -�► r a►,. 1 _._� � r 146 (340 df f p Y CU Won J s rri L 696 ) 2 Aa�t_ 1� t 206 (5 (51 Figure 21 -17 e t Scenario 3 (2030) Vehicular Turn Movements Gateway AUAR • 9TH �" ► ► � � - s' • _2 �n i v rM MOOT !/' N L'423 (139) �T 9 (614) 190 (1393) 661 4i ~ ( ) ~ 502 (1134) 115 ( 31) 34 {3j 302 379 ► O 113 ( 358)1 129 ( 548)---t- 1009 (1140) 2428 (1332) iTr O tD 9 ( 35)--4,,,. 263 ( 129)Z ^.'►,, L 32( 5) 784 1983 's N�� • I CNW qq r 170( 54) tl % West 77th Street _x1 2391(1494)--4 I I 1 ,., *t�►; 300( 53) 4- ' .,r. rr',. •, ■ �v . �• �_M. f r..r�L� (ti} � u � �i � .. t MINNESOTA :y �.� street 7 low'tw -. �iA Ow a* dRA - A - - - it a or pr MFNL*— D 4r J 12 ( 14) ) 708(23 32) 49 ( 84)1. 121 ( 21) 2777 (1400)--4 219 ( 73)x- t x • i C 0 . its WSB && Assor& a D N a 0 g' °o U O Oo � Y tim roo C4 m oa OO tlO to l� tD 01G o to West 76th Street IF 2 161 (971) .. 75 (500) Z Cq in r to 04 NON ;{ N � � �# t 39 22 s r sr s' ter: +�rF1 75 (480) 0 y.. t h 451 (1370) L e n � O "O ' 657 (1320) — U S► 0OO Ln�M L 166 (230) ' 1— 80 ( 4) 7 7§4 52) Minnesota Drive (41) j� , 48 (242) 1 1 1 �1 2 (76) ' 160 (728) "Z (52) Z a� ..., C NV nL N Q co c" r . cn ji 062 (160) 1 121 (777) '� , w:': �, •'° War West 78th Street co v IT to to � N to LEGEND om �±►.'+, �l z; �i AM (PM) PEAK HOUR 4 } 915 (372) 1 r xx (xX) TURNING MOVEMENTS O 798 (538) Z A LANE GEOMETRY TRAFFIC CONTROL e e 2 Figure 21 -18 e ^! Scenario 3 (2030) Vehicular Turn Movements J �Y Gateway AUAR A L 19 ( 67) t 101 (206) IT r a}N oo N , C1 to r to rrr :• ' 3 t 23 ( 55) 1— 362 (188) r 121 (305) IT I CO LM N I t 699 (305) 1-- 331 ( 85) N r 361 (263) ITr o -It rr N w N WSB & Assocla,es, Inc. a 0 N Q 0 4 V O o� m E Q � � 4 t.. TANO fib tM' ' • t i � s t f N NMr NdM •. ,► .w "' 00 L 79 (397) _ X662 (M) s (•— (M) 680(219) 13) e E PI�� 303(309) SAW y •� I 113 ( 358) h? 508(1061) I I r 9 ( 35) R 1. moo O� /� aoaN Gov le LO Edina Industrial Boulevard hA N N m aw .10 Im la ON �. � o"' ^� � ` --�_�` �` a �„ ..� Y � - „ .. ; ; .. . • , a• s. yy„ a •r,r.� .='- (119, 78 1) 1* w`b + 78th Street 4"w _tip �. . Ile 1 'V • L ; .� 64) AV Alm IF o - _ CU J nCD CO CO tt .C� 203 (483 (574 ae 11 a rl,• a pw w Figure 21 -19 A Scenario 4 (2030) Vehicular Turn Movements WSB Gateway AUAR & Associates, Inc. 129 ( 548)---t- 1227 (1229) 186 ( 129)Z L 189 (85 r 1— 500 (70 39 ( 31) � '��• "' " r C" 617 (1138) r # `..9r� ( 53) !� % West 77th Street 123 1103 (1220) —) 206 ( 53)x- I �7 I ti• �- O N r (4 N O n N � u> v c LO CO s. L . � 01 N C CL U 1f , 49 ( 84)s�, 1389 (1209)::: 125 ( 721--'&- L 189 (85 r 1— 500 (70 39 ( 31) � '��• "' " r C" 617 (1138) r # `..9r� ( 53) !� % West 77th Street 123 1103 (1220) —) 206 ( 53)x- I �7 I ti• �- O N r (4 N O n N � u> v c C CL U 1f , -� 12 ( 14) 623(1426) 44 ( 20) ' %E. -w' p""" - - , i..t I fob . 1 a b h H P 0 a 0 V O O O \O �+ Y mm 0 am m� i3 a •' ...... Nm L 19( 67) H , a: 1 278 (202) •— .. West 76th Street • , -.• 62(207) ht() �•f 162 (577) —+ 1 1 1 v % 75 (297) «.I to f- a • � v •' 3 t 28( 20) �r�xrt �►+f`� .�t r 210 (466) t C �r °( °) X1111 > 1 ��• t L� ,A w�•-, M i aQ� �) j ? j) + .... .. 4 two c N 661 (647) --1 III • •. MA,t • " A w r Ca r 0 00 N M �`- �► 0 0 0 Lo cO10 t 166 (230) t ~I 23 ( 55) S �+ r- 7( 52) '� r!/`� 121 (305) Minnesota Drive ,... , 1 (41) �, 48(154) ! —► 252 (423) 4 t T,'•. • ' • 5 5 (52) 161 (404) Z c°° aa'o .. - • • 04 qr ( ) W r T�t a I m � < co • 111 v 00 C'4, M w N "k (3) 331 85 ( ) C: 'S J' '" ' — j -W— .361 (263) h - " ' - 1 62 (160) 1 o M a } _ 121 (777) Ln Z J ONC') re • , 11 •� West 78th Street ;C • -. Q)M t LEGEND %z AM (PM) PEAK HOUR TURNING MOVEMENTS 744 (371) 1 O 798 (538) .x (xx) Z am LANE GEOMETRY _ 'M 'l 'r TOP TRAFFIC CONTROL ..C) # a) .• a i' 4e T Figure 21 -20 e Scenario 4 (2030) Vehicular Turn Movements Gateway AUAR :.1 ■ 4 4j A WSB � -mss- c D ti a 0 a °o U n � O� � O D 0 m E � O 4 m 4 m 03 N "'ra ■ - .f 1 low • yr, 't ` } i� - v 3 .o..A .. drift pl- s -- - ,t C• ;,rte - WWWp_ .1r; � � • ` �t .. to �; . ai `'. t • - • r�t1. �' ` tys • r �� r '. " . -...rl i 1 1 ` ?.w' is •rr or . �'s • . r i � ri.r pia i '�"S � � T '� '� / t • ap 1W rl lot IN et _ V m _ • est 76thiStr ;'. ip S3 jr `a ndustrial Qou� y I —► �I West 77 . .. •r'"r ws_ sl1! ' H ry S, =�L% • CAR S2-31 x ,r 3` S T^+�.►,r r 1 s w + �- i .•.a Minnesota Drive _T- Figure 21 -21 Traffic Mitigation Plan Gateway AUAR ..� •r, Itui r 1 dw i- It 0" - _• �.,� ` r L t� - y r, _. i! �►' r�. its —Y .tt M/1• WSB D H N a 0 i 0 R �O O 'a �v 0 c� o; — —1 L ? , . ` onn lo,. � Y w rarre• N""•'qs 4 b '.. _ - o� mm� sr. �.S �yo, s•. �, " tHy ca wl ooE sr. d• " sv�" . y g g •`. - _� ,fir . o 'ws' oil � 9 .� nm sr � ul`e°4 S,t"' sr. 4 Y � �sr ff�y �iao. � . ;,,y aca0. slot .a vLw.c u. r+.. �'� � o v •. s .n sr. � � � s M 5 n� `� � Y r � >9 t m a. to 'm. - a t Isi �� °`' . "5"' Y { , a ^' •� "aLav r S P'JORTH $ . ` i : sr. 8 W .rra s J ✓i d o sc bi a .z na • � � sra+ L 0 � "•<•w•wow aro. S s* 3 � � � 3 .: ra sr. � t I me s . :' _ + � • `' � � ¢ r8 � Mrmlaud••k ,� • .z � sr. ,� ' II � � ! •,y6' '� u. sr s. wow la 8 4 Y$ Y � sr. � �• a t ' � .w y� � � a 5°E o �.�so+ s � Y ' /�/ / • � M3 xo � = w•i � r�� a - $ YL. : W4 r Loaf. .xt. ; 3 d. i d � „ �� � 0 # $ �; .I: gg �� ^" qa w. oct e,. � . •Pa �, � � •" I06 urt.... .n. I.xo[LSSa« u. ` aX �Q, c �" Xa P.°o8 ' 3 «S 4 yam•♦ 6 d yy y{ y Y .. a.., M sr, d S P,EA.[XF•- "V 5i Q uro. urta.cXU.. a a ;' s' • "� [ ~ 'r �,a•r - .wn sr. � i � E d � F� a rt i sg L4� ti Y' - ., ff�• � s. : � � i e� �8 � � Xd6LO @ % u"n Mo-ro, �� 8 � sr .. sr. � •. 11 y t 7 � 4 •,. �,y HYI✓and. ; c, S 3 S - sr.•000enE L i sl r - r r,. ` a °.� Xw, ,mgXa• Potential Park aa, . X. 4 = ` !§111111 - 169 and Ride 8.4e �.� • d 1 8 aaww s 5 :�mP tr. ^ t .. ' . a•. ^. Y w• g " � ,� 5 � 'e � �' � ; s ^,� , . nLro• L.. „.n s,. .P` . ,tLr.l � ,IE ilu w3o eESr� S"f d•.,xE wo J .m s �• abr4r o. Ettm � sr. :.,k. �s.0 �lo.a �' - g ' � "°° �J`'♦ os. u 9y � � d aasd � n•cwo° c'• elonProo 8 8 � �' � nxufBG "" �E. 4'I�`` of zxi•000xuL „r•'oa � y fl . �s Ltr Is , 4 .n`}� o” 4 sE 6 •. ss .n 953 � .. � Y ' � ,s.l, +r• n � zi ntLO ur �� �cla. ts✓ +v � � 8 ?. 5 mm� �" sr.•''E. � . LEri,k rax � s� oE� ffi $ owt of 8 r*a 4�r' r+�X$ Xts S "I"6r. "0 • � ti,� " e. n g sr. �a � �4 � elsc ..x[� � 8' a!'" • J• �.°•' ".M a.a t+ d ¢t ". n .n s,. .. Lak. 1 / X ao. Y i�.+o � " sr. sr u ! � J auPeom L4 i Y6 0 'et 4^ V sr. "L W • •. cancow c 1 ! oraa.oEmlr '�! +Y ; j Su yt korl�X[ ou°E $s, Y ,. r M rta. mrroa L IT amm S \ Yd oa b •' tl rk�te't ur• u° Y � sc 4 � a M � 'Y • Y ie .sR$ Y i 4� & Flo. �: � J sr.. sf.n sr. k " s s, h L • � sv m gg W"• 2 w n � sr. � •_ • r. � � M •. so Y . 8 � !•�_� " : ? � t su.5 <a� 4a '°dw.0 � sLmC�l1 �+o rw 3 •aoRc,E°"R � ". .k d � - z� � ,a•� sr. �j E � .I .. sr. �' � ' g y � � � ~b a t - .x. 'V. ,crr n. QT•�"' `� ema, cllESr sc •• � ♦ 6 y S�+ IW n" W .. Q p � e s 'iC �: aPrca a � SP 3 •. s:ne •. 3 t Y • r 3, R`. " xut sN01 ausoa o•lat "r sE`' v � � �, a.000 6 �} •. ❑ /"rn r r�EOX, r %dt-� v6• ` ` +, Y <• cwr �, y ,� � Xc C. • 0 for • • 3 XNS�, j sl. SA. Ys i . It sl (RE. Yr t. 10. R ' y %<lE. ♦wM "�., � _ Southdale � g ''iLLe �"`ie it uLrc• 8 $� rars P ��� p � Y w � � sr. & ..�1 _ a.cw° �" � . .� 9� Qy y a.•`� •:' wm sr. olt • ._ - $ n 1 ,sap 4x/ 4 ♦ 0.1 ".wry < dY un mow: := Ys tl�rrt "� Transit Center . w + + rt �i°'•• •' p , °"°as.s 3� err° Bus Routes:6,114,152 a„ •.,e �� a • �,.� w, y , rfft I„ 515,538,539,578,631 cP. aay us Y '!? �y IT ' 4 ryM y,.w• uprli A, ! pa. ,•' sT. w v w<u . a"°` oL. .. k n `" w> LaXronv"'g• •o, k --4K. pp jj y p.� d e! $ ,I N IS eF6Ya Si IT, a IIM •yE•, XLLN• S' 10. [ i M � ♦ ,.cir [� P. •' �^W "rY bar, " xxwCr L ' r., aVR 8 LE•n • ♦`�.. J9' rc`sb,X9 Es n. nLLta -sR.. y`♦ o �r.LauolaPl. on. 8 � •r � _ 5 �g 44 • n w '� ', I al y,tyLr tIR • d � � aEMlq � ° g - _ al M w XflLe S "[P. g `�' EfRr �"� X¢ .♦f. i I I.e<, dy+y' `ai:'urm :PS' "'P♦ � o � � � - is __ � d �,ar � y.rE. � � $ � Nfrr ,•I ( 1 `x, „Q 0 J 5�,� I, , . Irprs'° '.,ap a• Iw d w �� E •� o 1 Y _y Lf. [Ol �l �l ` S .. Ytalr,n . • . T-9 if ezna sr. •.5• C i _ eze .\� ea'o y 1�7 W tw.wclrc% I \'�:�../ III" �' ,. . r dw. rzd7d! \*6 ? >. '1. a �''.� " •aal.. ■I / -Y //.IRI ..E%� °` Te � k� A` g Y. � °j �. Y � LEGEND: Bus Route a•a ■••■ Limited Service © Southdale Transit Center with Parking ti� Figure 21 -22 r ° e Existing Transit Service wsB /r �.�." Ga to wa y A UA R & Associates, Figure 24 -1 e �� Noise Receptor WSB a$ 0 500 1,000 Gateway AUAR Feet S & Associates, Inc. o�9e ^r4° Figure 29 -9 Q Gateway AUAR Study Area " - �,� � Adjacent Developments Map o nc Feet WSB Gateway AUAR S & Associates, Inc. 0 Appendix B Department of Natural Resources and State Historical Preservation Office Correspondence April 04, 2007 Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program, Box 25 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 -40_ Phone: (651) 259 -5109 Fax: (651) 296 -1811 E -mail: lisaJoyal @dnr.state.mn.us Mr. Brian Connolly WSB & Associates, Inc. 701 Xenia Ave. South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Re: Request for Natural Heritage information for vicinity of proposed Gateway AUAR, T28N R24W Section 21, Hennepin County NHNRP Contact #: ERDB 20070643 Dear Mr. Connolly, The Minnesota Natural Heritage database has been reviewed to determine if any rare plant oranimal species or other significant natural features are known to occur within an approximate one -mile radius of the area indicated on the map enclosed with your information request. Based on this review, there are 4 known occurrences of rare species or native plant communities in the area searched. For details, please see the enclosed database printouts and the explanation of selected fields. The Nahual Heritage database is maintained by 'the Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program, a unit within the DivisionofEcological Services; Departineiit'ofNatural Resources. It is continually updated as new information becorties'availablc;`and is the most complete source of data on Minnesota's-rare or otherwise significant species, native plant communities, and other natural features. Its purpose is to foster better understanding and protection of these features. Because our information is not based on a comprehensive inventory, there may be rare or otherwise significant natural features in the state that are not represented in the database. A county-by -county survey of rare natural features is now underway, and has been completed for Hennepin County. Our information about native plant communities is, therefore, quite thorough for that county. However, because survey work for rare plants and animals is less exhaustive, and because there has not been an on -site survey of all areas of the county, ecologically significant features for which we have no records may exist on the project area. The enclosed results of the database search are provided in two formats: short record report and long record report. To control the release of locational information, which might result in the damage or destruction of a rare element, both printout formats are copyrighted. The short record report provides rare feature locations only to the nearest section, and may be reprinted, unaltered, in an Environmental Assessment Worksheet, municipal natural resource plan, or report compiled by your company for the project listed above. If you wish to reproduce the short record report for any other purpose, please contact me to request written permission. The long record report includes more detailed locational information, and is for your personal use only. If you wish to reprint the long record report for any purpose, please contact me to request written permission. Please be aware that review by the Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program focuses onlyon rare natural features. It does not constitute review or approval by the Department of Natural Resources as a whole. If you require further information on the environmental review process for other natural resource - related issues, you may contact your Regional Environmental Assessment Ecologist, Wayne Barstad, at (65 1) 772 -7940. DNR Information: 651- 296 -6157 • 1- 888 -646 -6367 • TTY: 651- 296 -5484 • 1- 800 - 657 -3929 An Equal Oppnrum6 Emplm:r M Printed on Recycled Paper Comainin_ a ' \linimuui t Ih', P..i- (',m�umrr 11,i.t� An invoice in the amount of $67.08 will be mailed to you under separate cover within two weeks of the date of this letter. You are being billed for map and database search and staff scientist review. Thank you for consulting us on this matter, and for your interest in preserving Minnesota's rare natural resources. Sincerely, jvos�j -�� Isf Joyal Endangered Species Environmental Review Coordinator encl: Database search results Rare Feature Database Print -Outs: An Explanation of Fields Element Name and Occurrence Number Minnesota Natural Heritage & Nongame Research Program Short Record Report of Element Occurrences within 1 mile radius of: Edina Gateway AUAR T28N R24W Section 31 Hennepin County Federal MN Status Status Hennepin County, MN Emvdoidea blandingii (Blandines Turtle) #479 Location Description: T28N R24W Sal Emvdoidea blandingii (Blandines Turtle) #679 Location Description: T28N R24W 529, T28N R24W S34, T28N R24W S33, T27N R24W S4, T27N R24W S3, T28N R24W 532, T28N R24W S27, T28N R24W S28 Falco oereerinus (Peregrine Falcon) #91 Location Description: T27N R24W S5 Gallinula chloropus (Common Moorhen) 42 Location Description: T27N R24W S8, T27N R24W S6, T27N R24W S5, T27N R24W S7 Records Printed = 4 Page I of I State Global Rank Rank Last Observed Date THR S2 G4 1989 -08 -25 THR S2 G4 1993 -05 -07 No Status THR S2B G4 2006 -06 No Status SPC S313 G5 1972 -07- Copyright 2006 State of Minnesota DNR Printed 3/2,1/2007 The Natural Heritage & Nongame Research Program recently adopted a new database system called Biotics. As a result of this change, the layout and contents of the database reports have been revised. Many of the fields included in the new reports are the same or similar to the previous report fields, however there are several new fields and some of the field definitions have been slightly modified. We recommend that you familiarize yourself with the latest field explanations. Rare Features Database Reports: An Explanation of Fields The Rare Features database (Biotics) is part of the Natural Heritage Information System, and is maintained by the Natural Heritage and Nongamc Research Program, a unit within the Division of Ecological Services, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR). * *Please note that the print -outs are copyrighted and may not be reproduced without permission* * Field Name: [Full (non- abbreviated) field name, if different]: Further explanation of field. -E- Element Name and Occ #: [Element Name and Occurrence Number]. The Element is the name of the rare feature. For plant and animal species records, tads field holds the scientific nine followed by the common name in parentheses; for all other elements (such as native plant communities, which have no scientific name) it is solely the element name. Native plant community names correspond to Minnesota's Native Plant Community Classification (Version 2.0). The Occurrence Number, in combination with the Element Name, uniquely identifies each record. EO Data: [Element Occurrence Data]. For species elements, this field contains data collected on the biology of the Element Occurrence* (EO), including the number of individuals, vigor, habitat, soils, associated species, peculiar characteristics, etc. For native plant community elements, this field is a summary text description of the vegetation of the EO, including structure (strata) and composition (dominanticharacteristic species), heterogeneity, successional stage /dynamics, any unique aspects of the community or additional noteworthy species (including animals). Note that this is a new field and it has not been filled out for many of the records that were collected prior to conversion to the new database system. Some of the information meeting the field definition may be found in the General Description field. EO ID #: [Element Occurrence Identification Number]. Unique identifier for each Element.Occun ence record. EO Rank: [Element Occurrence Rank]. An evaluation of the quality and condition of an Element Occurrence (EO) from A (highest) to D (lowest). Represents a comparative evaluation of: 1) quality as determined by representativeness of the occurrence especially as compared to EO specifications and including maturity, size, numbers, etc. 2) condition (how much has the site and the EO itself been damaged or altered from its optimal condition and character). 3) viability (the long -term prospects for continued existence of this occurrence - used in ranking species only). EO Ranks are assigned based on recent fieldwork by knowledgeable individuals. Extent Known ?: A value that indicates whether the full extent of the Element is known (i.e., it has been determined through field survey) at that location. If null, the value has not been determined. -F- Federal Status: Status of species under the U.S. Endangered Species Act: LE = endangered; LT = threatened; LE,LT = listed endangered in part of its range, listed threatened in another part of its range; LT,PDL = listed threatened, proposed for delisting; C = candidate for listing. If null or "No Status" the species has no federal status. First Observed Date: Date that the Element Occurrence was first reported at the site in format YYYY- MM -DD. A year followed by "Pre" indicates that the observed date was sometime prior to the date listed, but the exact date is unknown. _G_ General Description: General description or word picture of the area where the Element Occurrence (EO) is located (i.e.; the physical setting/context surrounding the EO), including a list of adjacent communities. When available, information on surrounding land use may be included. Note that the information tracked in this field is now more narrowly defined than it was in the old database system, and some of the information still in this field more accurately meets the definition of the new EO Data field. We are working to clean up'the records so that the information in the two fields corresponds to the current field explanations described herein. Also note that the use of uppercase in sentences in this field is not significant but rather an artifact of transferring data from the old database system to the new system. Global Rank: The global (i.e., range -wide) assessment of the relative rarity or imperilment of the species or community. Ranges from G1 (critically imperiled due to extreme rarity on a world -wide basis) to G5 (demonstrably secure, though perhaps rare in parts of its range). Global ranks are determined by NatureServe, an international network of natural heritage programs and conservation data centers. _L_ Last Observed Date: Date that the Element Occurrence was last observed to be extant at the site in format YYYY- MM -DD. Last Survey Date: Date of the most recent field survey for the Element Occurrence, regardless of whether it was found during the visit. If the field is blank, assume the date is the same as the Last Observed Date. Location Description: County or Counties in which the Element Occurrence was documented followed by Township, Range, and Section information (not listed in any particular order). Each unique Township, Range, and Section combination is separated by a comma. In some cases, there are too many Township, Range, and Section combinations to lise in the field, in which case, the information will be replaced with, "Legal description is too lengthy to fit in allotted space ". _M_ Managed Area(s): Name of the federally, state, locally, or privately managed park, forest, refuge, preserve, etc., containing the occurrence, if any. If this field is blank, the element probably occurs on private land. If "(Statutory Boundary)" occurs after the name of a managed area, the location may be a private inholding within the statutory boundary of a state forest or park. MN Status: [Minnesota Status]. Legal status of plant and animal species under the Minnesota Endangered Species Law: END = endangered; THR = threatened; SPC = special concern; NON = tracked, but no legal status. Native plant communities, geological features, and colonial waterbird nesting sites do not have any legal status under the Endangered Species Law and are represented by a N /A. -N- NPC Classification (vl .5): Native plant community name in Minnesota's Native Vegetation: A Key to Natural Communities (Version 1.5). This earlier classification has been replaced by Minnesota's Native Plant Community Classification (Version 2.0). -O- Observed Area: The total area of the Element Occurrence, in acres, which is measured or estimated during fieldwork. If null, the value has not been determined. Ownership Type: Indicates whether the land on which the Element Occurrence was located was publicly or privately owned; for publicly owned land, the agency with management responsibility is listed, if known. _S_ Site Name: The name of the site(s) where the Element Occurrence is located. Sites are natural areas of land with boundaries determined and mapped according to biological and ecological considerations. Survey Site #/Name: The name of the survey site, if applicable, where the Element Occurrence is located. Survey sites are sites thatprovide a geographic framework for recording and storing data, but their boundaries are not based on'biological and ecological considerations. Minnesota County Biological Survey site numbers, if applicable, are also listed in this field. Survey Type: Information on the type of survey used to collect information on the Element Occurrence. Surveyor(s): Name(s) of the person(s) that collected survey information on the Element Occurrence. State Rank: Rank that best characterizes the relative rarity or endangerment of the taxon or plant community in Minnesota... The ranks do not represent a legal status. They are used by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to set priorities for research, inventory and conservation planning. The state ranks are updated as inventory information becomes available. S 1 = Critically imperiled in Minnesota because of extreme rarity or because of some factor(s) making it especially vulnerable to extirpation from the state. S2 = Imperiled in Minnesota because of rarity or because of some factor(s) making it very vulnerable to extirpation from the state. S3 = Vulnerable in Minnesota either because rare or uncommon, or found in a restricted range, or because of other factors making it vulnerable to extirpation. S4 = Apparently secure in Minnesota, usually widespread. S5 = Demonstrably secure in Minnesota, essentially ineradicable under present conditions. SH = Of historical occurrence in the state, perhaps having not been verified in the past 20 years, but suspected to be still extant. An element would become SH without the 20 -year delay if the only known occurrences in the state were destroyed or if it had been extensively and unsuccessfully looked for. SNR = Rank not yet assessed. SU = Unable to rank. SX = Presumed extinct in Minnesota. SNA = Rank not applicable. S #S# = Range Rank: a numeric range rank (e.g., S2S3) is used to indicate the range of uncertainty about the exact status of the element. S #B, S #N = Used only for migratory animals, whereby B refers to the breeding population of the element in Minnesota and N refers to the non - breeding population of the element in Minnesota. _V_ Vegetation Plot: Code(s) for any vegetation plot data that have been collected within this Element Occurrence (i.e., either Releve Number or the word "RELEVE" indicates that a releve has been collected). * Element Occurrence — an area of land and/or water in which an Element (i.e., a rare species or community) is, or was, present, and which has practical conservation value for the Element as evidenced by potential continued (or historical) presence and/or regular recurrence at a given location. Specifications for each species determine whether multiple observations should be considered 1 Element Occurrence or 2, based on minimum separation distance and barriers to movement. Data Security Locations of some rare features must be treated as sensitive information because widespread knowledge of these locations could result in harm to the tare features. For example, wildflowers such as orchids and economically valuable plants such as ginseng are vulnerable to exploitation by collectors; other species, such as bald eagles, are sensitive to disturbance by observers. For this reason, we prefer that publications not identify the precise locations of vulnerable species. We suggest describing the location only to the nearest section. If this is not acceptable for your purposes, please call and discuss this issue with the Endangered Species Environmental Review Coordinator for the Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program at (651) 259 -5107. Revised 4.:2006 Hi story /Architecture PROPERTY NAME ADDRESS COUNTY Hennepin CITWTOWNSHIP: Edina Sturges House 6813 Oakiawn Ave. 1+ nla T* ap PA*ror m2fy, COUNTY Ramsey CITYITOWNSHIP: St. Paul Lock and Dam No. 2 Mississippi River north of Lake Street/Marshal Ave. \ y N/� n Sr_ PevL Twp Range See Quarters USGS 28 24 31 N -SW -SE Minneapolis South 28 24 31 NE -NE -SE St. Paul W Report NRHP CEF DOE Inventory Number Y HE -EDC -0592 RA -SPC -6003 Thursday, March 22, 2007 Page I of 1 Pagel of 2 Brian Connolly From: Cinadr, Thomas [thomas.cinadr @mnhs.org] Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2007 8:01 AM To: Brian Connolly Subject: RE: Historical & Archaeological Information Request Attachments: Historic1doc THIS EMAIL IS NOT A PROJECT CLEARANCE. This message simply reports the results of the cultural resources database search you requested. The database search produced results for only previously known archaeological sites and historic properties. Please read the note below carefully. For further information contact Kelly Gragg- Johnson by phone at 651 -259 -3455 or email at kelly.gragg- Johnson @mnhs.org. No historic properties were identified in a search of the Minnesota Archaeological Inventory and Historic Structures Inventory for the search area requested. A report containing the archaeological sites identified is attached. The result of this database search provides a listing of recorded archaeological sites and historic architectural properties that are included in the current SHPO databases. Because the majority of archaeological sites in the state and many historic architectural properties have not been recorded, important sites or structures may exist within the search area and may be affected by development projects within that area. Additional research, including field survey, may be necessary to adequately assess the area's potential to contain historic properties. With regard to Environmental Assessment Worksheets (EAW), a negative known site /structure response from the SHPO databases is not necessarily appropriate information on which to base a "No" response to EAW Question 25a. It is the Responsible Governmental Unit's (RGU) obligation to verify the accuracy of the information contained within the EAW. A "No" response to Question 25a without written justification should be carefully considered. If you require a comprehensive assessment of a project's potential to impact archaeological sites or historic. architectural properties, you may need to hire a qualified archaeologist and /or historian. Please contact the SHPO by phone at 651 - 296 -5434 or by email at mnshpo @mnhs.org for current lists of professional consultants in these fields. For further questions on the review process contact the Reviews Department at 651 - 259 -3450. The Minnesota SHPO Survey Manuals and Database Metadata can be found at http://www.mnhs.org/shpo/survey/inventories.htm 3/22/2007 Page 2 of 2 Tom Cinadr Survey and Information Management Coordinator Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office Minnesota Historical Society 345 Kellogg Blvd. West St. Paul, MN 55102 - 651 - 259 -3453 (voice) 651 - 282 -2374 (fax) - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Brian Connolly [mailto:bconnolly @wsbeng.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 2:45 PM To: Cinadr, Thomas Subject: Historical & Archaeological Information Request Mr. Cinadr: My name is Brian Connolly, and I am working on an Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for the City of Edina. I am looking for historical and archaeological database information for the following area: Hennepin County City of Edina T28N, R24W. South % of Section 31 Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks! -Brian Brian D. Connolly W SB & Associates, Inc. 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Phone: 763 -541 -4800 (Main) 763 - 287 -8520 (Direct) 612- 282 -3641 (Cell) Fax: 763 -541 -1700 E -mail: bconnolly@wsbeng.com 3/22/2007 MEMORANDUM 17 September 2007 TO: Cary Teague, Planning Director Joyce Repya, Associate Planner (HPB staff) FR: Robert Vogel, Preservation Planning Consultant RE: Heritage Resources Assessment of the Gateway Study Area Per your request, I conducted a preliminary heritage resources assessment of the Pentagon Park of Edina office complex located at Highway 100 and 77th Street West. The purpose of this investigation was to identify and gather information on potential heritage preservation resources in the Gateway Study Area. The investigation was conducted at the reconnaissance level and involved limited background documentary research as well as a "windshield survey" of the study area designed to provide me with a general idea of the distribution of buildings and their architectural characteristics. Architectural Information The Pentagon Park office complex comprises sixteen freestanding buildings that were constructed in phases between 1963 and 1970. Except for the low -rise office tower and the cluster of office buildings located west of Computer Avenue, the buildings are arranged in an orthogonal pattern, and a large portion of the ground surface within the project area boundaries is covered by pavement. Architecturally, the entire ensemble is a carefully composed set of Modernist - influenced architectural and landscape components typical of corporate office park complexes from the postwar period. The office tower at 4940 Viking Drive, which provides the visual anchor for the office park, is a 6 -story low -rise building somewhat reminiscent of a traditional stacked vertical office block. It was built in 1966 by Rauenhorst' Construction. Nearly devoid of exterior ornamentation, the tower's architectural character is defined by its wide projecting eaves, glass and masonry curtain walls, and flat roof. There is no differentiation in fenestration or exterior finishes between floors except the sixth floor, where the offices have larger windows. The building is oriented with its corners Pentagon Park - page 1 of 6 pointing to the cardinal compass points, though no one elevation is treated as the primary fagade. Four single -story rectangular office buildings radiate outward from the tower. The 2 -story office buildings are low- profile, monolithic, box -like structures characterized by their Modernist style horizontal proportions, undecorated masonry walls, and flat roofs without parapets. The walls are dominated by narrow, vertically aligned vertical windows between concrete ribs: the visual effect of the windows and exposed framing is repetitive and monotonous. No elevation is treated as the primary facade and there is no differentiation between floors except at the entrances. Although there are minor differences in size and proportions between the buildings constructed during the Pentagon Tower and Pentagon Quads phases of the development, they all share the some basic design elements and architectural anonymity. Except for a small plaza at the west end of the complex, landscaping consists entirely of parking lots, which function somewhat like open spaces; at street level, the parking areas are more visually prominent than the office buildings (with the exception of the tower), which serve as backdrops to the rows of parked cars during normal business hours. Highway 100, the original Twin Cities beltway constructed between 1938 and 1942, and its interchange with Interstate Highway 494, completed in 1959, define the physical context of development in southwest Edina and are, in fact, Pentagon Park's reason for existence. The multi- tenant office park is designed to house up to approximately 300 tenants and incorporate a wide range of space types, including offices, lobbies, conference rooms, rest rooms, mechanical and service areas, restaurants, banks, postal and copy services, vending areas, daycare, and small shops. The office park's primary amenity, the Fred Richards Executive Golf Course, is located outside of the Gateway Stu_ dy Area boundaries. Historical Information I was unable to verify the accuracy of the statement, which appears on the Wayzata Properties webpage, that Pentagon Park represents "the first planned office park in the Twin Cities." (A recent article in Minneapolis /St. Paul Business Journal refers to it as "one of the first corporate campuses in the Twin Cities "; it is not mentioned in Gebhard and Martinson's Guide to the Architecture of Minnesota [1977] or Scott and Hess' History and Architecture of Edina [1981].) According to the National Building Museum, the General Motors Technical Center at Warren, Michigan, was the first Pentagon Park - page 1 of 6 modern suburban office park in the country. Designed by the Finnish American father - and -son architectural team of Eliel and Eero Sarrinen, the 25- building, 330 -acre facility was designed in 1949 -51 and built in 1955 -56. Like the Pentagon Park buildings, the GM Tech Center is a Modernist composition dominated by low -rise "Miesion" style buildings, abundant parking, and landscape amenities. The Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (3M) headquarters on 1 -94 in Maplewood, designed by Ellerbe Architects and built in the late 1950's, would appear to have a good claim to the title of first corporate office park in the Twin Cities and is also an example of Modernist architecture. It may well be that Edina's Pentagon Park represents the first speculative office park development in the Twin Cities —more intensive research will be required to clarify this historical association. According to Hesterman's narrative history of Edina, early non - residential development in this part of the city was somewhat controversial: Though Chicago planning expert Walter Blucher had argued to the Edina Council in 1955 that Edina needed commercial and industrial development to avoid increasing tax rates, neighborhood opposition slowed commercial development ... Nevertheless, the concept of carefully planned commercial and industrial development with tight zoning and deed restrictions which Southdale pioneered provided a solution which allowed Edina to incorporate commercial and industrial development which would strengthen rather than undermine Edina's character as a residential community. By 1970 the Pentagon Park and Edina Interchange Centers near the intersection of Highway 100 and 494 had helped diversify Edina's tax base. Even so, development of land use plans for the southwest corner of the village ... continued to draw fire from area residents (pp. 96 -97_). Pentagon Park was designed and built by Rauenhorst Construction, a company founded by 25- year -old Gerald A. Rauenhorst in 1953. It was one of the company's biggest early projects, along with the Normandale Center Industrial Park (1961 -70). In 1982 Rauenhorst Construction became Opus Corporation, one of the largest real estate development companies in the country. Evaluation of Potential Significance For a building or group of buildings to qualify for designation as an Edina Heritage Landmark it must meet one of the landmark eligibility criteria by being associated with an important historic context and retaining historic Pentagon Park - page 1 of 6 integrity of those features necessary to convey its significance. Built between 1963 and 1.970, the Pentagon Park property certainly meets the minimum requirements for consideration as a heritage resource. The buildings physically -and spatially comprise a specific environment shaped by historical processes of land use. Architecturally, the buildings are the product of the dissemination of the Modern or "International" style that dominated commercial architecture from the early 1950's through the late 1970's. Mere association with a particular period or architectural style is not enough for Pentagon Park to qualify as historically significant: it must be shown to have been significant in commercial or architectural history. Contextually, it relates to the broad theme of postwar suburban development delineated in the City of Edina Historic Context Study (which provides the framework for identifying and evaluating heritage resources within the city limits). Although office park was not specifically identified as a significant heritage property type in the historic context study, the general theme of Modern style commercial architecture is recognized as one aspect of the postwar suburban built environment. Unlike the National Register of Historic Places, which disqualifies buildings less than 50 years old from consideration unless they are of "exceptional" importance, the city's landmark code sets no arbitrary restrictions on how old a property must be before it can be considered a - heritage resource. For planning purposes, the City uses 1974 as the terminal date for the historic context dealing with suburban development. The Pentagon Park property falls well within the chronological limits of "The Suburban Landscape" study unit. While it clearly possesses the defined characteristics required to represent the theme of suburban commercial development, it is unlikely that Pentagon Park represents the sole surviving example of a 1960's office complex in Edina — comparison with other, historically - related properties will be essential for determining its preservation value. It is certainly not the best surviving example of Modern style commercial architecture in the city, though its association with the early career of professional engineer /real estate developer Gerald A. (Gerry) Rauenhorst, the founding chairman of Opus Corporation, may be significant as well. Recommendation With respect to the draft AUAR, the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) inventory database for historical and architectural resources is not considered a reliable indicator of the presence or absence of significant cultural resources within a given area. While it is true that the Gateway Pentagon Park - page 1 of 6 Study Area contains no properties that have been listed in or determined eligible for the National Register of Historic Places, the reason for this would appear to be obvious: until the present investigation, no one has even looked for these resources on the ground. Given that the developer's own website refers to the Pentagon Park property as "the first planned office park in the Twin Cities," even declaring that it "has achieved virtual landmark status within the community," one wonders why the AUAR preparers did not undertake even a perfunctory assessment of the project's effects on potential heritage preservation resources. While it is not possible for me to make a conclusive determination of Pentagon Park's heritage landmark eligibility at this time, I would recommend that the potential heritage value of the . buildings be given proper consideration during the development planning process. At a minimum, more intensive survey is needed to provide the information needed to fully evaluate its historical and architectural significance. This will require a close and careful look at the property to identify all heritage resources within the area of project effects, detailed inspection of the individual buildings, and thorough documentation of their physical history. I would also like to do more research on the history of office parks in the Twin Cities area to better determine how Pentagon Park represents the property type and to develop a better perspective on the potential significance of being "the first" example of the type. Given the rising level of preservation interest in heritage resources from the "recent past," the SHPO could be expected to require intensive survey and mitigation of adverse effects if any future project involving the Pentagon Park locality would require compliance with the National Environmental Protection Act or the National Historic Preservation Act. (Any projects using Community Development Block Grants, State Aid transportation funds, or other federal assistance would be subject to SHPO review and compliance.) Assuming that all or part of the Pentagon Park office complex will eventually give way to redevelopment, several mitigation options are available to avoid complete loss. Before demolition occurs, the tower and the other office buildings should be permanently recorded with . archival - quality drawings, photographs, and written data so that a body of information will remain about them. As a matter of policy, the Heritage Preservation Board has adopted the Secretary of the Interior's standards for historical and architectural documentation, which provide an appropriate format for recordation products. (The same mitigation standards used in National Register of Historic Places program). It may Pentagon Park - page 1 of 6 also be appropriate to salvage some architectural elements for curation in a museum. References Cited Black, Sam. "Major Change for Edina Office Park ?" Minneapolis /St. Paul Business Journal, 27 -April 2007. Gateway Study Area Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review. Prepared by WSB & Associates for the City of Edina, 3 July 2007. Gebhard, David, and Tom Martinson. A Guide to the Architecture of Minnesota. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1977. Hesterman, Paul D. From Settlement to Suburb: The History of Edina, Minnesota. Edina Historical Society, 1988. National Building Museum. "Reinvigorating Cities: Smart Growth and Choices for Chicago." Exhibit guide. Washington, D.C., 2000. Opus Corporation. "History." Website visited 12 September 2007. http;l /www.or)usaroup.com /- overview /History /html Scott, William W., and Jeffrey A. Hess. History and Architecture of Edina, Minnesota. City of Edina, 1981. Vogel, Robert C. Edina Historic Contexts. Edina Heritage Preservation Board, 1999. Wayzata Properties. "Pentagon Park Building, Edina Office Leasing." website visited .12 September 2007 httr): / /www /wayzatar)roperties.com /pentagon park.htm Pentagon Park - page 1 of 6 L Appendix C Responses to Comments and Comment Letters August 20, 2007 Mr. Cary Teague Planning Director City of Edina 4801 West 50'h Street Edina, MN 55424 Minnesota Department: of Natural Resources 500 Lafayette Road St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 -4025 RE: EDINA GATEWAY STUDY AREA DRAFT AUAR Dear Mr. Teague: The Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has reviewed the Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) for the EDINA GATEWAY STUDY AREA. We offer the following comments for your consideration. " The Draft AUAR generally is complete and accurate. The proposal is for redevelopment of a highly developed urban area. There is little habitat on -site and the surrounding area is also developed. There appears to be little or no opportunity for restoring a portion of the site to native habitat. Nine Mile Creek, located west of the Gateway site is the main natural resource-element of concern. The earlier development of Edina, Bloomington and the highway system essentially was accomplished without consideration for impacts to the creek, ultimately damaging its structure and impairing water quality. The AUAR addresses water quality and quantity. We encourage efforts to manage stormwater on site to reduce strain on the creek. Item No. 17. Water quality — Surface Water Runoff (pp. 40-44) This item indicates that the existing storm water ponding is insufficient and that the receiving water, Nine Mile Creek, is impaired for turbidity, chloride and biota. This item.suggests the use-"of low impact techniques to reduce impervious surfaces. Along that`line, we might recommend that the developer utilize pervious pavement and pavers for parking lots:and walkways and design buildings with systems to capture and store precipitation for use in lawn watering, flush toilets, etc. This would help address both the storage and stream impairment problems. DNR Information: 651- 296 -6157 0 1- 888546 -6367 0 TTY: 651-296-5484 An Equal Opportunity Employer Who Values Diversity 0 /1- 800557 -3929 1 Mr. Teague August 20, 2007 Page 2 We appreciate the opportunity to provide comments on the AUAR and thank you for your consideration. Please feel free to contact me. with any questions or comments. Sincerely, Ronald Wieland, Senior Planner; (651) 259 -5157 Environmental Review and Planning Unit Division of Ecological Resources cc: Bonita Eliason, Ecological Resources Regional Manager Wayne Barstad, DNR Ecological Resources Regional Ecologist Steve Colvin, DNR Environmental Review Supervisor Matthew Langan, DNR Principal Planner Lisa Joyal, DNR Endangered Species Environmental Review Coordinator ERDB# 20070643 -0002 D:\DNR—Comments\EDINA—GATEWAY—DRAFT—AUAR.doe "`""ESOrOQF Minnesota Department of Transportation Metropolitan District Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B -2 Roseville, MN 55113 -3174 August 15, 2007 Mr. Cary Teague Planning Director City of Edina 4801 West 501 Street Edina, MN 55424 Subject: Gateway Study Area Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) Review # AUAR07 -003 TH 100 and 701h Street City of Edina/ Hennepin County Mn/DOT Control Section # 2733 Dear Mr. Teague: Thank you for the opportunity to review the Gateway Study AUAR. Please note that Mn/DOT's review of this AUAR does not constitute approval of a regional traffic analysis and is not a specific approval for access or new roadway improvements. As plans are refined, we would like the opportunity to meet with our partners and to review the updated information. Mn/DOT's staff has reviewed the document and has the following comments: Traffic: In reviewing the draft AUAR, there will be substantial increased traffic demands for TH 100 (both directions) and I494 west of East Bush Lake Road (both directions). Please note that Mn1DOT has no immediate plans to expand TH 100 or I494 in that area. Page 66, Table 21 -1 describes its source as "Derived from Highway Capacity Manual (2000) ". Level of Service is generally a measure of hourly traffic flow, rather than a measure of daily traffic. It would be possible for the daily traffic to be at a level that would appear uncongested, but for the peak periods, to still experience congestion. Therefore, the Level of Service should be derived from the peak period. Mn/DOT has adopted Table 21 -3 as a universal freeway assessment standard. Therefore it is suggested that Table 21-4 on Page 69 be removed and only Table 21 -3 be used. Throughout the document, there are several references to Bush Lake Road. Mn/DOT believes these references should be East Bush Lake Road. There should be discussion regarding traffic impacts to the loops at the I- 494/France Avenue interchange. Also, Mn/DOT would appreciate discussion of specific traffic impacts from the proposed redevelopment on the TH 100/1 -494 interchange, particularly the south to east movement. Even if these impacts can not be easily mitigated, they should be quantified. An equal opportunity employer The mitigation plan includes construction of an eight -lane bridge at the TH 100/West 77th Street interchange. There is no funding allocated in Mn/DOT's 20 -Year Transportation System Plan for the reconstruction of this interchange. - Please feel free to direct questions regarding these issues to Jolene Servatius, of Mn/DOT's Traffic Support Section, at (651) 234 -7841, or Wayne Norris, Mn/DOT's West Area Engineer; at (65 1) 234 -7724. Residential Noise Statement:. Mn/DOT's policy is to assist local governments in promoting compatibility between land use and. highways. Residential,uses located adjacent to,'highways often result in complaints about traffc'noise..Traffic noise from this highway could exceed noise standards established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (NTCA), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the U.S. Department of Transportation. Minnesota Rule 7030:0030 states that municipalities are responsible for taking all reasonable measures to prevent land use activities listed in the MPCA's Noise Area Classification (NAC) where the establishment of the'land use would result in violations of established noise standards. Mn/DOT policy regarding development adjacent to existing'highways prohibits the expenditure of highway funds for noise mitigation measures in such areas. The project proposer should assess the noise situation and take the action-deemed necessary to ininiinize the iunpact of any highway noise. If .you have any questions regarding Mn/DOT's noise policy please contact Peter Wasko in our Design. section at (65 1) 234- 7681. Permits. Any work impacting Mn/DOT right of way will also require a peanut. Permit forms are available from,MnDOT's-utility website at www:dotcstate.mn.us /tecsup /utility. Please include one full size plan set and one 11" x 17" plan set with each .p.'ermit application. Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Bu6*Craig, MnDOT's Metro Permits Section, at (651) 234 -7911. As a reminder, please address all initial future correspondence for development activity such as plats and site plans to: Development Review Coordinator Mn/DOT Metro Division Waters Edge 1500 West County Road B -2 Roseville, Minnesota 55113 Mn/DOT document submittal guidelines require three (3) complete copies of plats and two (2) copies of other review documents including site plans. Failure to provide three (3) copies of a plat and/or two (2) copies of other review documents will make a submittal incomplete and delay Mn/DOT's 30 -day review and response process to development proposals. . We appreciate your anticipated cooperation in providing the necessary number of copies, as this will prevent us from having to delay and/or return incomplete submittals. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (651) 234 -7797. Sincerely, William Goff Intermediate Planner Planner cc: Bob- Byers, Hennepin County Transportation Planning Section, Medina, MN Andrea Moffatt, WSB & Associates, Minneapolis, MN File copy to: Mn/DOT LGL file: City of Edina/Hennepin County Mn/DOT District file: CS: 2733 Copy via Groupwise: Tod Sherman Wayne Norris Buck Craig Jolene Servatius Dale Matti Rolf Nelson Bob Byers, P.E. Hennepin County Public Works 1600 Prairie Drive Medina, MN 55340 -5421 Andrea Moffatt WSB & Associates 701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 BY E -MAIL AND MESSENGER August 15, 2007, Mr. Cary Teague Planning Director City of Edina 4$01 West 50'' Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Comments On The Gateway Study Area Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review Dear Mr. Teague: We represent Gateway Development Edina LLC, ( "Gateway Development ") the company identified in the Gateway Study Area Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review (the "Draft AUAR") as the "Developer." Gateway Development owns the parcels referred to in the Draft AUAR as the "Pentagon Towers site" and the "Pentagon Quads site." We have reviewed the Draft AUAR and the Draft Mitigation Plan For Gateway Study Area ( "Draft Mitigation Plan") and have a limited number of comments on these documents that are presented in.this letter. 1. GENERAL COMMENTS The Draft AUAR represents a solid effort to address the potential environmental consequences of the redevelopment levels in the Gateway Study Area., With the addition of certain information more fully described below and other changes, the Gateway Study Area Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review ("Final- AUAIV) and the Final Mitigation Plan For Gateway Study Area ( "Final Mitigation Plan") should accurately, and completely portray these consequences. 2. SPECIFIC COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT AUAR 2.1 6. Description, B. Description of Redevelopment Scenarios, Tables 6 -2 and 673. Gateway Development's proposal for development on the Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quads sites results in significantly less development than Scenario 2. We have reproduced below Tables 6 -2 and 6 -3 and added lines labeled "2D" that show the density of Gateway Development's proposal to indicate this difference. Mr. Cary Teague August 15, 2007 Page 2 Table 6 -2. Summary of Redevelonment Scenarios* Calculations do not take into account existing or proposed wetlands, storm ponds, roads, right -of -way, or utility easements in the Gateway Study Area. a Acreage includes mixed use development with commercial, retail, and office space applications. n Acreage includes mixed use development with office space applications. Table 6 -3: Comnarison -of Redevelonment Scenarios with ExistinLr Conditions Existing Scenario 1: Office Space, Scenario Scenario 3: Scenario 4: o Conditions Comp. Plan Warehousing, Retail & Housing & Maximum •r Office Space & Li ht Developer's Residential Hotel g Plan cial Office 1,873,000 1,546 000 Industrial (Mixed Use) ) (Mixed Use) :1,094,000 Commercial / Retail/Hotel 15,000 174,000 ` 160,000 15,000. 15,000 ; Office & Light Industrial Mix 1,296,000 � PC 0 6�� � 1,296,000 G� W as '� � 47 � � y V1 311-000. 0i arl TOTAL: o. 2,888,000 as 93. W, O 2,211,000? A W ,•OO _ 3,986 000 as C f=I ,o. as G W o d d W O 'A ai VJ C3 ., rA �.. Gi r_ L S ry� ai os it •7 61 ,�. N L .. q G 6i .•... y,. .., ft �, 10.E O p 1�, O O �' ±� C 7' �' C :� FA 4 CJcn du' Cam•° C7rn• C7rn'.o~� ai t7rn r. 1 122.68 70.95 1.546 49.59 ' 1.296 2.14 0.015. 36 - - - 2 122.68 31.84. 1.862 ' 49.59 1.296 41.25a 0.094 856 0.914 150 0.080 2D 39.1 11.08 1.168 0 0 1.8 .080 820 .883 150. .080 3 122.68 70.95 3.261 49.59 1.296 2.14 0:015 36 _ - - - 4 1 122.68 31.84 1.094 49.59 1.296 41.25 _:. 0:015 1 1,536 1.581 - - Calculations do not take into account existing or proposed wetlands, storm ponds, roads, right -of -way, or utility easements in the Gateway Study Area. a Acreage includes mixed use development with commercial, retail, and office space applications. n Acreage includes mixed use development with office space applications. Table 6 -3: Comnarison -of Redevelonment Scenarios with ExistinLr Conditions The level of development proposed by Gateway Development does require a comprehensive plan amendment. This comment is an observation to clarify what Gateway Development is proposing. We do not believe these tables need to be added to the Final AUAR. 2.2 6. Description, C. Anticipated Infrastructure Improvements, p. 20 -21. The Transportation paragraph fails to identify traffic mitigation measures that are already needed or will be needed based on already approved developments and -2- 81 SOUTH 9TH STREET #310 MINNEAPOLIS, MN SS402 TEL 612.333.0006 FAx 612.333.3540 Existing Scenario 1: Scenario 2: Scenario Scenario 3: Scenario 4: Conditions Comp. Plan Master 2D: Maximum Maximum Plan Developer's Commer- Residential Plan cial Office 1,873,000 1,546 000 1,862,000. "1,168,000? _ 322613000 :1,094,000 Commercial / Retail/Hotel 15,000 174,000 ` 160,000 15,000. 15,000 ; Office & Light Industrial Mix 1,296,000 1,296,000 0 1,296,000, 1,296,000 Residential 31,000 31,000 914,000 883,00-0- 311-000. 1,581,000 TOTAL: 1,904 000 2,888,000 4,246 000 2,211,000? 4,603 000 _ 3,986 000 The level of development proposed by Gateway Development does require a comprehensive plan amendment. This comment is an observation to clarify what Gateway Development is proposing. We do not believe these tables need to be added to the Final AUAR. 2.2 6. Description, C. Anticipated Infrastructure Improvements, p. 20 -21. The Transportation paragraph fails to identify traffic mitigation measures that are already needed or will be needed based on already approved developments and -2- 81 SOUTH 9TH STREET #310 MINNEAPOLIS, MN SS402 TEL 612.333.0006 FAx 612.333.3540 Mr. Cary Teague August 15, 2007 Page 3 expected increases in background traffic. Please see the more complete comment on this point in Paragraph 2.9. 2.3 Project Magnitude Data, Project Magnitude Mitigation Plan, p. 22. The text states that building heights may range "up to 14 stories for a proposed hotel." The hotel proposed by Gateway Development is seven stories high, not 14 stories. Office buildings on the Pentagon Towers site may reach 14. stories. This information should be corrected in the Final AUAR. 2.4 7. Project Magnitude Data, Project Magnitude Mitigation Plan, p. 22 -23. This mitigation measure implies that variances are the only way to gain approval for project components that exceed Edina City Code requirements. A project proposer could also seek to amend Edina City Code, and this option should be added to the Final AUAR. 2.5 8. Permits And Approvals, Table 8 -1, p. 23 -24. Under the Geologic Hazards. and Soil Conditions Mitigation Plan in the fourth bullet on p. 63, the text suggests that permanent dewatering would need to be approved by the Nine Mile Creek = Watershed District. This approval needs to be added to Table 8 -1. 2.6 17. Water Quality — Surface Water Runoff, Water Quality — Surface Water Runoff Mitigation Plan, p. 44. We do not understand the reference here in the third bullet to a reduction in runoff volume "so as not to negatively impact the existing storm sewer system." We understand the need to reduce runoff volume to meet the City's and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District's storm water standards. We cannot find any discussion in the Draft AUAR, however, about existing storm water volumes negatively impacting the storm sewers or any thresholds for volume reductions needed to eliminate this impact. This needs to be clarified in the Final AUAR 2.7 18. Water Quality — Wastewater, Impacts of Development Scenarios, p. 49. The text in the first full paragraph on page 49 states that there are no other known developments occurring within Sanitary Sewer Districts A or B but outside the Gateway Study Area that would impact Lift Station No. 10 or 6. No information or conclusion on this subject is offered for Sanitary Sewer District C. This missing information should be added to the Final AUAR. 2.8 19. Geologic Hazards and Soil Conditions, Geologic Hazards and Soil Conditions Mitigation Plan, p. 63. The first bullet indicates that a project's Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ( "SWPPP ") will be reviewed as part of the platting process. This review will occur as part of the City's general review process, the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District's permit review, and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's NPDES /SDS Construction Storm Water -3- 81 SOUTH 9TH STREET #310 MINNEAPOLIS, MN SS402 ret 612.333.0006 vnx 612.333.3540 Mr. Cary Teague August 15, 2007 Page 4 Permit review. We do not think the SWPPP will be subject to review during the platting process. This should be corrected in the Final AUAR. 2.9 21. Traffic, p. 65 -109. We have three main concerns related to the traffic analysis and traffic mitigation plan: • The mitigation measures required as a result of existing conditions, background growth, and cumulative project impacts are not defined. • The mitigation measures provide. no means to determine when each measure is necessary or how it will be determined which landowner triggers which improvements. • There is no indication whether the proposed mitigation measures can be constructed without major right of way or building impacts. A. Existing And Background Growth. Even though the Draft AUAR is not required to evaluate a no build alternative, a complete traffic analysis should evaluate background traffic increases and the cumulative impacts of projects _ planned or under construction. Otherwise the City cannot separate the redevelopment scenario traffic impacts from background traffic impacts and cumulative project impacts. For example, the existing conditions described in the Draft AUAR indicate at least two intersections that currently operate at level of service ( "LOS ") E and three that operate at LOS 1) in the PM peak hour (Table 21 -8). The freeway analysis also shows one merge /ramp junction that operates at LOS F and several more at LOS D in the PM peak hour (Table 21 -9). Based on existing conditions, it is fully expected that background growth alone will result in additional intersection LOS impacts by year 2014 and 2030. But except for Table 21 -21, which includes a 2014 No Build analysis, the Draft AUAR fails to provide this information. The distinction between redevelopment traffic impacts versus background impacts and cumulative project impacts should be disclosed in the Final AUAR and Final Mitigation Plan. To do so, a no -build evaluation should be included in Tables 21 -14 through 21 -20 of the Draft AUAR. B. Mitigation Thresholds The way the Roadway Improvements Mitigation Plan reads currently, the City's intent on when mitigation measures will be implemented is unclear. One could argue, the way the measures are currently written, that no measures are needed prior to 2014, and some not until 2030. Or it could be interpreted that no redevelopment can occur between now and 2014 until all the 2014 measures are in place, and none between 2014 and 2030 until all the 2030 measures are in place. We do not believe the City intended either of these interpretations, thus additional information is needed in the Final AUAR. 10 81 SOUTH 9TH STREET #310 MINNEAPOLIS, MN SS402 TEL 612.333.0006 PA% 612.333.3540 Mr. Cary Teague August 15, 2007 Page 5 Since the LOS impact evaluation is based on the number of trips in the AM and PM peak hours, traffic improvements could be linked to trip thresholds. Thresholds should first reflect improvements triggered by background trip growth and cumulative project trip growth and then improvements triggered by redevelopment net trip increases. As to redevelopment, attention would also need to be paid to the location of the redevelopment. For example, redevelopment on the west end of the Study Area is less likely to create trip increases on France Avenue as compared to development on the east end of the Study Area. The net increase in trips would also take into account the reduction of trips as a result of existing users being replaced with new users. For example, removal of 500 trips and the addition of 300 should not result in triggering any mitigation measures. Adding trip thresholds for each mitigation measure in the Final. AUAR would help developers and public officials to plan for redevelopment. However, given the number of redevelopment levels and locations and the number of mitigation locations, this may not be feasible in the Final AUAR. if not, then a mitigation measure should be added that requires each project proposer to prepare a traffic study that analyzes the traffic impacts of its proposed redevelopment (or redevelopment phase) and identifies any traffic mitigation measures triggered by it. C Mitigation Feasibility. The Roadway Improvement Mitigation Plan provides no indication whether each proposed mitigation measures is feasible or practical. For example, the reconstruction of the TH100 /77th Street interchange for Scenario 3 would require MnDOT to reconstruct the existing bridge. This is not something the City or Study Area landowners could be required to do, since they have no jurisdiction over this interchange. As another example, can the additional thru lane proposed on France Avenue be added without removing existing buildings or acquisition of additional right of way? In the Final AUAR, the feasibility and responsibility for the traffic mitigation measures should receive additional analysis. 2.10 24. Odors, Noise, and Dust, Noise Analysis, p. 99. Noise receptor R3 is identified as being "in an existing residential development." What does "in'.' mean? Inside a building? Inside a courtyard? The Final AUAR should clarify this. 2.11 24. Odors, Noise, and Dust, Noise Analysis, p. 99 -100. The text describes why the locations of noise receptors R1. through R4 were chosen but gives no reasons for choosing the locations of receptors R5 and R6. This information should be provided in the Final AUAR. -5- 81 SOUTH 9TH STREET #310 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 reL 612.333.0006 FAX 612.333.3540 Mr. Cary Teague August 15, 2007 Page 6 2.12 24. Odors, Noise, and Dust, Noise Analysis and Tables 24 -2 and 24 -4, p. 100 -101. On page 100, it indicates that all- residential noise receptors are shown in bold in Tables 24 -2 and 24 -3. But receptor R3, which is identified on page 99 as being in a residential development, is noVrepresented in bold in either .table. This should be corrected in the Final AUAR. 2.13 24. - Odors, Noise, and Dust, Table 24 -3, p. 101. Receptors R3 and R6 are on opposite sides of West 77th Street, approximately the same distance fro: m the roadway. Yet in Table 24 =3 the noise levels differ between the receptors by 10+ decibels or double the noise. level. T_ his needs to be checked or explained before publication of the Final AUAR 2.14 24. Odors, Noise, and Dust, Odors, Noise, and Dust Mitigation Measures, p. 102. The mitigation measure in the third bullet would be more helpful if it noted that the applicable noise abatement requirements to conform to state . standards can be found in Minn. Rules 7030.0050, subp. 3. This should be added to the Final AUAR. 2.15 26. Visual Impacts, Visual Impacts Mitigation Plan, p. 103. This mitigation measure implies that variances are the only way to gain approval for project components that exceed Edina City Code requirements. A project proposer could also seek to amend Edina City Code, and this option should be added to the Final AUAR. See also comment in Paragraph 2.4. 3. SPECIFIC COMMENTS ON DRAFT MITIGATION PLAN 3.1 A. Land Use Compatibility and Permitting, A4, 'p. 8. As to mitigation measure A4, see the comment in Paragraphs 2.4 and 2.15. 3.2 B. Geologic Hazards, Erosion Control, and Hazardous Material, B4, p. 8. As to mitigation measure B4, see the comment in Paragraph 2.8. 3.3 E. Water Quality and Quantity Mitigation Plan, E3, p. 11. As to mitigation measure E3, see the comment in Paragraph 2.6. 3.4 G. Traffic and Transportation, p.12 -13. For comments on mitigation measures G -1 through G -3, see Paragraph 2.9. 3.5 H. Odor, Noise, and Dust, H3, p. 13. As to mitigation measure H3, see the comment in Paragraph 2.14. 81 SOUTH 9TH STREET 9310, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 ret 612.333.0006 vnx 612.333.3540 Mr. Cary Teague August 15, 2007' Page 7 3.6 I. Cumulative Impacts, p. 14. As we read the Draft AUAR, there are several more places where Edina proposes to cooperate with other jurisdictions to address cumulative impact, for example, with Bloomington and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and withAhe Metropolitan Council on sanitary sewer capacity. All these efforts should be listed in the Final AUAR. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the Draft AUAR. 'If you have questions about our comments, please call me. Sincerely, EBERHARDT ADVISORY, LLC as Developer's Representative By: , "X J mes W. Nelson JWN: WHR:EK:tb.u5.2221921.01 cc: M. G. Kaminski Daniel J. Green Elizabeth Kunkel Walter H. Rockenstein II -7- 81 SOUTH 9TH STREET 9310 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402 TEL .612.333.0006 FAx 612.333.3540 FRUM NINE MILE CREEK WED) AUG 15 2007 0:'25/ST. U. L4! Ho. 7500000082 Ir 2 IBM low MM near IN= W A T E R 5 H E D D 1 S T R I C T District Office: Edina Business. Center 7710 Computer Avenue: - Suite 135 Edina, MN 55435 Ph. 952.835.2078 Fax 952 - 8384079 Web Site: www ninemilecruek.org August 15, 2007 Mr. Cary Teague Planning Director City of Edina 480'1 West 50*,Street Edina, UN 55424 .bear Mr.,Teague: On behalf of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Board m£Managers., l would like to thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Drat AUAR for the Gateway Study Area. I offer the following c omments for your consideration. 1. As is stated in the AUAR, permits will be needed from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District (NMCWD) before any construction activities on the Gateway project can commence. 2. The AUAR mentions the need to address rate and volume control of stormwater. The NMCWD is cutrentlyin a rule- making process that will' require rate and volume control. The NMCWD would encourage the developer to follow the proposed new rules to help reduce stormwater runoff rates and volumes. 3. As mentioned above, the NMCWD is: currently developing new rules. These rules will include wetlands, stormwater management, sediment _& erosion control, and floodplains. The stormwater management rule will require rate and volume control.&— all developments and redevelopments. The:NMCWD is considering a volume control requirement that will require the retention on site of the first one (1) inch of runoff gengrated -from all impervious,surfaces on the site. Developments will be required to limit peak rimoff°rates to that from existing conditions for the 2 -, 10 -, and 100 -year storm events. It is anticipated that the new rules will be adopted in,early 2008. 4. Water quality treatment of stormwater will need to provide removal efficiencies of at ieast 60% for phnsplinrus and at least 80% for total suspended solids. 5. Maintenance of stormwater management facilities will be critical to ensuring the long -term viability of such facilities. Maintenance plans that identify and protect the design; capacity, and functionality of stormwater management structures should be developed Board of Managers LuAnn ralliver - Minnetonka Corrine Lynch - Eden Prairie Bob KoloBn - Edina Flovd Laumann - Bloominolon Geofirev Nash - Edina 6. The NMCWD is pleased to see that Low Impact Development (LID) techniques are being encouraged by the City of Edina. The NMCWD also encourages the use of LID techniques to reduce impervious surface of developments and help reduce stormwater runoff. 7. , . As the AUAR stated, Nine Mile Creek is listed'on that State's impaired waters list for turbidity, biota, and chlorides. The NMCWD is working the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to develop TMDL studies for these impairments. The NMCWD encourages the developer to identify practices that will reduce the runoff of sediments and chlorides from the project sites. This will help improve the water quality of Nine Mile Creek. The Nine Mile Creek Watershed District thanks you for the opportunity to review and continents on the Gateway AUAIL On behalf of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Board of Managers, I look forward to working with the City of Edina and Gateway - Development, Edina LLC on this development. if you bavc any questions, please contact me at (952) 835 -2078. Sincerely, Kevin D. ;Bigalke District Administrator 1 . Metropolitan C Duncil August 14, 2007 Mr. Cary Teague Planning Director City of Edina 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 -1330 RE: City of Edina, Gateway Study Area, Draft Alternative Urban Area -wide Review Metropolitan Council District 5 Metropolitan Council Review No. 20052 -1 Dear Mr. Teague: Metropolitan Council staff has completed its review of the Gateway Study Area Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review ( DAUAR) to determine its accuracy and completeness in addressing regional concerns. Tho DAUAR analyzes the potential impacts of four development scenarios on approximately 135 acres located in Edina, MN. The study area is bounded by Minnesota Trunk Highway 100 (TH 100) on the west; France Avenue on the east; 76 I Street W. and Fred Richards Golf Course on the north; and the Edina/Bloomington border on the south. The study area currently contains a mix of land uses totaling 1,904,000 gross square feet (g.s.f.). These include: -light industrial/warehouse and commercial/office development, (1,873,000 g.s.f.), and residential land uses, (31,000 g.s.f.). Under the four scenarios evaluated, the project ranges from 31,000 to 1,581,000 g.s.f of residential development and 3,332,000 to 4,572,000 g.s.f. of commercial /office /lieat industrial development. Council staff finds the information in the DAUAR is incomplete to determine the impact of the development scenarios to the Metropolitan Disposal System. The DAUAR also raises issues of consistency with Cowzcil policies in several areas as described in the following 'sections. Mitigation Plan: John Dillery, Metro Transit, (612- 379 -7773) Transit The DAUAR down't mention bus service. In addition to being a significant mode of transportation, bui transit service is also a potential method of mitigating traffic congestion in the AUAR study Area. The high- density development proposed in Scenarios 2, 3 and 4 would support increased transit use, especially if high- density housing is provided as proposed in Scenario 4. This is supported in the DAUAR document, (page 107), where it states, "As the general population of Edina continues to age, there will be an increasing need for senior housing, especially in mixed -use developments where acquisition of personal goods and services do not require driving." The final AUAR, (FAUAR) should address transit service. www.metrocounr.U.org 390 Robert Street North 1 St. Paul, MN 55101 -1805 • (651) 602 -1000 • Fax (651) 602 -1550 • TTY (651) 291 -0904 August 14, 2007 Mr. Cary Teague Page 2 Metro Transit's main concern regarding the DAUAR,is for pedestrian safety and pedestrian access to transit facilities. Access to transit and pedestrian/transit facilities are generally deficient in the study area and, in addition, will be negatively affected in the development scenarios proposed in the DAUAR. The City's "Draft Mitigation Plan" for the Gateway Study Area, found on the blue pages 8 through 14, addresses traffic and transportation mitigation in Section G. The measures described in the mi.tigation plan seem to accommodate automobiles to the exclusion of other modes, such as bicycle and pedestrian traffic. The measures described add additional through lanes on already wide, pedestrian - unfriendly roads such as France Ave. (at Minnesota Drive) and double left turf and double right turn lanes at most of the intersections. Neither sidewalks nor pedestrian accoss are mentioned. 'this a real concern for transit service in the Gateway Study Area because bus riders are also pedestrians. Particular areas of concern for improved access and .flaelfltica include: i 1. Route 540/7 Sth -77th Street. The key bus route in the Gateway Study area is Route 540 76th/77th Street 'his route provides a cross -town service frown the Edina industrial area west of Elwy 100 to the Mall of America. Plans call for improved route frequency and the extension �f the route to the Normandale Lakes Office Park in Bloomington. 2. Route 6/ France * venue. Metro Transit provides frequent service on France Ave to /from Minieap#s to the Gateway Study Area via Route 6. Increased service is planned along France Avenue for this route and better pedestrian facilities are needed. 3. France Ave, Minoesota Drive, Parklawn Ave and W 77th Street. These streets have inadequate sidewalks in most areas. Sidewalks are discontinuous, most notably along France Ave northbound and along W 77th St. westbound. Where sidewalks exist, they are narrow, yet neXt to high volume roadways. Most bus stops are not currently ADA compliant. These safety deficits sh�uld be addressed by the FAUAR. How and where will sidewalks, not just roads, be widumed or provided in this study area? In addition to addressing safety concerns, the FALTAR also needs to describe improvements to non - motorized access both to and within the Gateway Study Area to create an up -to -date plan that recognizes the alternatives that vcist tc the single occupant automobile. There should be a section on this subject added to the FA UAR, complete with maps that, a) show existing bus stop locations and those stops requ' . g improvements to be ADA compliant, and b) document the sidewalk system and faciliti.es as they now exist and how these systems should be enhanced. The City should also addee:;s pedestrian access to transit in its comprehensive plan update, (CPU). August 14, 2007 Mr. Cary Teague Page 3 Item 8: Permits and Approvals; Item 27: Plan Compatibility Denise Pedersen Engen, (651- 602 - 1513)9 Todd Graham, (651- 602 -1322) Comprehensive Plan 'The City's 2008 a?u shouldincorporate policy and implementation measures to mitigate the effects of redevelopment in the Gateway Study Area. The DAUAR, page 104 indicates that implementing Scenarios 2, 3 and 4 would require the City's current comprehensive plan to be amended to allow ::or the proposed land uses and. densities. The FAUAR should provide details on how sucA mitigation will be addressed in the City's 2008 CPU and /or in a comprehensive plan amendment (CPA). Population and Household Forecasts Edina is estimated to have 21,100 households currently; the 2030 forecast is 22,590. Should the City decide to pursue development options ,2 or 4; it wi1T•ne'ed'tb request the Council to revise (increase) Edina's household and population forecasts. F,mployWent 1£+on, casts Developrhent Scenarios 2 and 3 would allow for gross employment growth in Edina. The Metropolitan: Council has forecasted Edina employment to grow from 53,000 in 2000 to 62,400 in 2030. So far this decade, Edina employment has declined substantially to a current estimate of 49,300. Even Vith development options 2 or 3, Edina is unlikely to reach i-s current 2030 Metropolitan System Statement employment forecast. Plan and Zoning Ordinance Compatibility State law considers a zoning ordinance to be an implementing measure for a comprehensive plan. Land uses allowed in a zoning district must. also be allowed in the designated land use guiding applied to an area in the comprehensive plan. This must be taken into account as the City develops a Cl ?A for the AUAR site and/or rezones properties in the AUAR study area. Item 18c Water quality - Wastewater Kyle Colvin, MCES, (651 - 602 - 1151) It appears that the regional disposal system that provides service to the AUAR study area is currently operatir;g near its full design capacity and has insufficient capacity to accommodate the additional flours generated by -the AUAR development (all alternatives). T e projected wastewater flow, ,as outlined under each of the four development Scenarios, w uld cause a system impact to the Metropolitan} Disposal System. However, the informatio in the DAUAR is not of sufficient detail to determine the precise impact of the AUA R development scenarios to the regional disposal system. Therefore, Council staff has determi ed that the DAUAR report is incomplete to determine the full impact to the regional disp sal system. The FAUAR needs to contain more detailed information related to the specify Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quad project (including staging, timing and additional f ows). Once this information i;: available, a meeting between the Metropolitan Council staf I and City of Edina staff will bo necessary to discuss both short term and long term service 6tions available for this area of the City. August 14, 2007 Mr. Cary Teague Page :4 Item 21: Traffic Ann Braden, Transportation, (651 -602 -1705) The DAUAR appears accurate and complete regarding' -tl a analysis of related road and intersection impacts. Mitigation strategies such as- additional turn lanes and lane extensions will be needed at v trio'us intersections within the study area to accommodate traffic from the different scenarios. Scenario 3 will have the largest impact to I-494 and TH 100 although deficiencies in weave. segments and; ramp junctions were attributable to increases in mainline volumes- rather tl an thd'increase in redevelopmerit t affic at the ramps: Expansion -of I -494 between Highway :100 and TH 77 is included in Ili exegionaltrarisportation plan as an expansionproject needed by 2030. iowever it is not. included inMnDOT's 10 year-work plan and no funds are identified'', for it.it..... 's'time. The Metropolitan Council will look for, these issues and concerns to be addressed in the FAUAR. Staff review of the FA JAR and mitigation plan will focus on its completeness and accuracy with respect to regional concerns and its consistency with regional policy. If you have any questions or need further information, please contact Denise Pedersen Engen, Principal Reviewer, (651 -602- 1513) or myself (651 -602- 1566). ` Sincerely, Phy Hanson, Manager Local Planning Assisttmce cc: Jack Jackson, MultiFamily Market Analyst • Tod Sherman, Development Reviews Coordinator, MnDOT Metro Division Russ Susag, Metropolitan Council District 5 Keith Buttlemttn, Environmento,Services Denise Pedersen Engen, SectorRepresentative Cheryl Olsen, Reviews Coordinator .I i� V:\ REVIEWS \Communities \Edina\Letters \Edina 2007 DAUAR Gateway Study Area 20052 -I.doc olb Cary Teague From: Tom Gastler [tgastler @hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 11:20 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: UAR Comments City of Edina Mr. Cary Teague Planning Director 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 E -mail: cteague@ci.edina.mn.us After reviewing the UAR I have three questions: 1) I did not see any reference to how the possible development options would affect the storm drainage to the north. I know that some improvements were made after the 1987 mega storm but wonder if redevelopment of this area would negatively impact the storm.drainage coming from 72nd down Oaklawn Ave? 2) I noticed that there might be some dewatering required; possibly permanent dewatering. How would this impact Lake Edina? Given that there is a possibility that Southdale's water based heating /cooling permit might not be renewed so that water flow might be stopped. If I understand the mechanics some of that water currently ends up in Lake Edina. Without this and with additional dewatering would the lake be negatively impacted? 3) There was a, very brief mention of the possible effects on police & fire in this report. Is this something that is covered'in the actual development planning or should more detail be given in this report? Thank you for your efforts on this document. L_ earn.Lau�h.Sliare. Reallivemoms is right place! 8/16/2007 Hennepin County Transportation Department 1600 Prairie Drive Medina, MN 55340 -5421 Mr. Cary Teague, Planning Director City of Edina 4801 West 50`h Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mr. Teague: 612- 596 -0300, Phone 763 - 478 -4000, FAX 763 - 478- 4030,TDD www.hennepin.us August 9, 2007 Re: Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) Gateway Study Area This letter provides comments on the draft AUAR for the Gateway Study Area located north of I -494 between TH- 100 and France Avenue (CSAH -17) dated July 3, 2007. Existing and Future Roadway Operations for France Avenue • We were somewhat surprised.by the AUAR's portrayal of the existing operations of France Avenue as being "uncongested" today. We perceive that this is not the case, and believe that perhaps the erroneous conclusion was reached in part due to the methodology used for the planning level analysis discussed on page 66. • Individual lane utilization is very unbalanced on France Avenue due to the high volume of turning vehicles. This unbalanced lane utilization .leads to spillback that affects multiple intersections along the. corridor. The Highway Capacity Manual methods for arterial roadways do not account for this type of phenomenon. ® One good example of this type of occurrence is the southbound movement from France Avenue to I -494. The rightmost southbound lane experiences a very high utilization due to the fact that both the westbound ramp and eastbound loop to I -494 are on the right side. Drivers typically try to anticipate the upcoming turn a few blocks in advance, so the spillback on a typical p.m. peak hour often stretches from West 78'h Street back almost to West 76 "' Street. Our studies have found that 55 % of'the southbound p.m. peak hour traffic is actually destined to these two ramps to I -494. • We have recently retimed our signals to improve the progression on France Avenue which has reduced these spillback queues somewhat, however adding many hundreds of vehicles in the peak hour onto southbound France Avenue will likely have a significant impact. Anticipated Traffic Growth • The AUAR asserts that background growth was added to account for other area developments, however the report's volumes show only a very slight addition beyond the trips added by the proposed development scenarios. For example, the base 2.005 ADT of 28,700 on France Avenue between West 76`h Street to Minnesota Drive (Table 21 -7) is only projected to grow to 29,600 ADT by 2030 for Scenarios 1 and 4 (Table 21 -14). This is only about a 3% growth in 25 years for the proposed development including background growth. • The average Hennepin County roadway is growing.about 2 % per year (64 % increase in 25 years). The recent Greater Southdale Area Study completed for Edina in 2005 projected a background traffic growth rate of 0.5 % 'per year (13 % increase in 25 years). The Southdale Study also. anticipated an overall 30 % increase in area tripmaking over the next 20 years due to redevelopment and new iTtixed uses. We believe these two issues should be resolved before the AUAR is finalized. Thank you for the opportunity to review the report. If you have any questions, please call me at (612) 596 -0354. Sincerely, Robert H. Byers, P.E. Senior Transportation Engineer c. James Grube —Director of Transportation and County Engineer Tom Johnson - Transportation Planning Tod Sherman — Mn/DOT Development Reviews Wayne Houle — Edina City Engineer and Dir. Public Works An Equal Opportunity Employer Recycled Paper CITY OF BLOOMINGTON MINNESOTA ' August 6, 2007 Cary Teague Planning Director City of .Edina 4801 W. 50`x, St. Edina, MN 55424 Re: Draft AUAR — Gateway Study Area Dear Mr. Teague: The City. of Bloomington appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Draft Alternative Urban Areawide Review for Edina's Gateway Study Area (the Draft AUAR). The City of Bloomington also looks forward to working jointly with Edina to-proactively plan for the future of the area bounded by France Ave., 'I -494, TH100 and the Fred Richards Golf Course. Although this area is divided by a City boundary, it clearly functions .as one neighborhood and will benefit from our cooperative planning efforts. Bloomington's review of the Draft AUAR has . focused on opportunities and challenges that we jointly:face in this redeveloping area. On August 6, 2007, the Bloomington City Council approved the following comments. 1. Wastewater. Properties in Bloomington and in most of the Gateway Study Area of Edina rely upon MCES Interceptor. BN -499 for wastewater service. Recent City of Bloomington flow monitoring shows that this MCES interceptor is near full capacity today in the vicinity of 84`h Street and France Avenue. Given present conditions, no additional flow can be added in the portions of Bloomington and Edina upstream of 84`h and France without danger of property damage from interceptor surcharges. Edina, Bloomington, and WSB representatives have.. met with MCES officials. to discuss the interceptor concerns. MCES is currently reviewing existing flows and development forecasts in order to make a decision on future improvements to the MCES. interceptor near 84`h and France. In addition to the long -term solution of replacing a segment of the interceptor with larger pipe, the Draft AUAR points out that a potential short-term partial solution involves adjusting the pumping cycles at MCES Lift Station #10 to reduce the peaking characteristics of flows downstream. MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER 1800 W. OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD, BLOOMINGTON MN 5 5431 -3 027 AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION /EQUAL PH 952 - 563 4780 FAX 952- 563 -8754 TTY 952 -563 -8740 OPPORTUNITIES EMPLOYER Mr. Cary Teague August 6, 2007 Page 2 of 4 Bloomington looks forward to working with Edina ana MCES on a regionally funded solution to the MCES interceptor capacity constraints that will allow development in the Gateway Study Area to proceed in a timely fashion. Ideally, these discussions will be far enough along to allow the Final AUAR to include: • Information on the timing of potential MCES improvements and therefore the time constraints on the commencement of redevelopment within the Gateway Study Area and • Information on the extent to which modifications to the pumping cycles at MCES Lift Station #10 could free capacity downstream in MCES Interceptor BN -499. 2. Storm Water Management. Bloomington anticipates additional discussions with Edina on the potential expansion of South Pond (also commonly referred to as the "Border Basin ") to improve the management of storm water quality and quantity in the area. Thinking of long -term redevelopment in the area, Bloomington would like to see South Pond expanded in a manner that would maximize its ability to serve as an amenity. Bloomington has considered enhancement of South Pond in the past, but has delayed submitting a petition to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District due to an area landowner request that relates to soil stability. The Cities of Edina and Bloomington should work with Nine Mile Creek Watershed District to discuss storm water quantity and quality improvement alternatives that are sensitive to area conditions, including soils. 3. Transportation. A. One traffic mitigation strategy not mentioned in the Draft AUAR is the addition of westbound I -494 access at East Bush Lake Road. Bloomington has been working on this strategy with the Federal Highway Administration and MnDOT for several years. The addition of westbound I- 494 access at East Bush Lake Road would benefit the Gateway Study Area and merits special mention in the Final AUAR and inclusion in the mitigation plan. Bloomington looks forward to working cooperatively with Edina to encourage construction of westbound 1 494 access at East Bush Lake Road. B. Another mitigation strategy not mentioned in the Draft. AUAR that merits consideration for the Final AUAR is the creation of a continuous east -west parallel arterial north of I -494 from France Avenue to East Bush Lake Road. This strategy would involve realigning 760' Street, 77h Street and Edina Industrial Boulevard to serve as one continuous parallel arterial, similar to American Boulevard on the south side of I -494. This improvement would facilitate improved traffic flow while encouraging additional redevelopment in the area. C. Figure 21 -4 and the text on Page 82 indicate that the same trip distribution assumptions were used .for each of the four development scenarios. Bloomington requests that Edina reexamine this assumption in the Final AUAR given that varying land use scenarios (residential vs. non- Mr. Cary Teague August 6, 2007 Page 3 of 4 residential uses for example) typically result in varying trip ,distribution, especially in regards to inbound vs. outbound ,trips during the AM and PM peak periods. From a Bloomington perspective, the ;assumed trip distribution to /from the east :on I -494 and to /from the south on Normandale'Boulevard seems low for all four scenarios. The trip. distribution assumption from the west on I -494 and W. 78th Street seems high in the PM period. D. Prior to preparation of the Final AUAR, Bloomington requests that Edina and Bloomington . staff meet to discuss several details related to, the .traffic impact analysis; especially the forecast traffic conditions. on -East Bush Lake Road -in Bloomington. For example, the Draft AUAR states that the 2030 level of service for the American Boulevard-and East Bush Lake Road intersection will be LOS F +100 in the AM 'peak and LOS A in the PM peak. - A recent, traffic study prepared for Bloomington by SRF (with higher :Bloomington development assumptions) looked at the same intersection -in 2030 and .forecast'a LOS B in the AM peak and a LOS B- in the PM peak. Similar differences in forecast levels of service ekist for the East Bush Lake Road intersections with the I -494 North Ramp, I -494 South Ramp and 78th Street. Given the large discrepancy between the Draft AUAR and a similar analysis done by SRF, Bloomington is concerned there may be a technical error in the Draft AUAR. If there is not a technical error, then Bloomington needs to better understand the impact -of Scenario 2 on East Bush Lake Road in.Bloomingtori. In either case, it would `be beneficial for traffic engineering staff from Bloomington and Edina to meet. Prior to the meeting, Bloomington requests a complete copy of the traffic study given that the turn movement figures do not depict the East Bush Lake Road and American Boulevard intersection and do not depict 2030 turn movements. E. Table 21 -3 states that East Bush Lake Road from American Boulevard to W. 78th Street is "two -lane with turn lanes ". It should read "four -lane with turn lanes ". F. Table 21 -14 appears to conflict with Tables 21 -17 and 21 -18, with respect to ratings of congestions levels. For example, Table 21 -14 classifies East Bush Lake Road from American Boulevard to W. 78th Street as "uncongested" in 2030, while Table 21-17 states that in 2030 all four modeled intersections in this stretch of East Bush Lake Road will operate at LOS F during the AM peak period under Scenario 2. Mr. Cary Teague August 6, 2007 Page 4 of 4 4. Cumulative Impacts. On Page 108 and in Figure. 29 -1, the Draft AUAR depicts "Current Adjacent. Redevelopment Proposals ". The text states that only Bloomington developments that are "approved and certain" are included. In regards to Figure 29 -1 and Table 29 -1, please note: • Bloomington approved final development. plans in April 200.7 fora 285,000 square foot office building at 8200 Norman Center Drive. The project is commonly referred to as the 8200 Tower ". The developer is United • The shading for Area #2 south of.American Boulevard should be removed. The Duke Realty proj ect is north. of American Boulevard. • Bloomingtotnas feceived an` application (not yet approved) from the Richdale Group to develop 418 apartment units at 5100 W. 8V Street. An EAW for the project will be released soon. • There are several othdr Bloomington projects within the area depicted in Figure 29 -1 that have received Bloomington zoning approval over the past 10 to 20 years bufthat may not be characterized as "certain" given the time elapsed since approval. 5. Notification. The City of Bloomington requests to be notified upon the receipt of applications _ for development projects within the Gateway ALTAR area. Thank you in advance for consideration of Bloomington's comments. Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Larry Lee, Community Development Director, at (952) 563 -8947. Sincerely, Gene Winstead Mayor Copy: James Hovland, Edina Mayor Gordon Hughes, Edina City Manager Wayne'Houle, Edina Public Works Director Cary Teague From: Jackie Hoogenakker Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 2:13 PM To: Cary Teague ' Subject: FW: Notice of Public Hearing coming your way I finally remembered to :pass this on to you. J - -- -- Original Message---- - From: Rick.D.Beaver@6eagate.com [ mailto :Rick.D.Beaver @seagate.com] Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 2dF0 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Fw: Notice.of Public Hearing coming your way This email is in response to the Gateway'AUAR. My name is.Rick Beaver and I work at the Seagate site at.4801 West 50th Street. I've been assigned the duty follow this issue and see how, if any, impacts it will have on Seagate. Can you please copy me on any minutes 6: from the July'24 public review meeting.. This can be via email or regular mail at: Rick Beaver NRW122 78.01 Computer Ave. So. Bloomington, MN 55435 Thanks. Rick Seaver Sr. Facilities Engineer Seagate Technology (952) 402 -7714- - - - -- Forwarded by Rick D Beaver /Seagate on 07/20/2007 01:36 PM - - - -- Mark A Frommelt /Seagate (952) 402 -7492 To Rick D Beaver /Seagate @Seagate cc 07/19/2007 09:48 AM Subject Fw: Notice of Public Hearing coming your way Please cover this and advise if issues. - - - -- Forwarded by Mark A Frommelt /Seagate on 07/19/2007 09:47 AM - - - -- Steve L Haugen /Seagate (952- 402 -7719) To 07/19/2007 09:30 AM Mark A.Frommelt 1 cc Subject IJ Cary Teague From: Nels P. Nelson [nnelson @barr.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 2:31 PM To: Cary Teague Subject: Gateway AUAR Mr. Teague, My interest in the Gateway project is mainly personal and based on walking through the area numerous times on my way to work. I do not comment as a representative of Barr Engineering Co. I would like to make two observations on the AUAR: 1. The figures do not appear to be posted on your website. Without the figures the AUAR as posted is difficult to follow. 2. The AUAR does not discuss the history of the site. The response to Question 25 seems to overlook the question of whether the Pentagon Park office development had any significance in the history or development of the City of Edina. Perhaps, in addition to the State Historical Society the preparers ought to have consulted with the Edina Historical Society. My personal observation is that the buildings have an unusual appearance and internal layout and are not at all like the current crop of office buildings. According to the April 27, 2007, Business Journal, Pentagon Park was one of the first corporate campuses in Minnesota and was among the first developments by the Rauenhorst Corp., predecessor to Opus Corp. The people who originally planned, built and worked in it are probably passing away. Therefore I suggest that since the structures are both intact and significant, their demolition will be an environmental impact that should at least be considered in the AUAR and subsequent issuance of permits for demolition. As a mitigation suggestion, would it be possible, at a minimum, to provide documentation of the structures and possibly the oral history of the project so that 100 years from now this part of our history will at least be knowable, if not intact? Thanks for your attention. Nels Nelson 5917 Kellogg Ave. S. Edina, MN. 952 926 4252 7/25/2007 Page 2 of 2 From: BetteEdina @aol.com [mailto:BetteEdina @ aol.com] Sent: Sunday, July 22, 2007 5:00 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Draft AUAR Report - Edina Hello, I have received notice of the upcoming meeting on July 24 regarding the AUAR Report to review the results of the environmental review process for the Gateway Area. My backyard property at 4936 Poppy Lane is adjacent to and directly behind the entry ramp onto Hwy. 100 North from 77th Street. The homeowners whose property borders the entry ramp onto Hwy. 100 N from 77th Street have already pled their case in the past regarding the noise and exhaust pollution due to our proximity to the highway. Especially during peak traffic times, conversations cannot be heard while sitting on the deck of my home due to the noise, nor can the stench of exhaust fumes be tolerated while outside in the backyard. We petitioned for a noise barrier of some sort but were told they would only build one 8 feet tall and that we would have to pay for it. This blatant disregard for the health and well -being of Edina's citizens was considered to be an abomination at that time. Should the Gateway development be allowed lo go forward, I fear that the noise and pollution will only become more unbearable and will severely depreciate the value of our existing properties. The increase in traffic over the years has only lessened the appeal for potential buyers of our properties, and any additional adverse effects will only serve to further diminish the value. Should there be changes slated to the intersection at 100 and 77th in an effort to widen and expand it, I would - demand that concrete noise barriers be erected along the entrance ramp onto 100 N from 77th Street, similar to the noise barrier at Hwy 100 N and W. 70th Street. The irony is that there aren't. even homes directly behind that noise barrier which has been there for many years now, but those living with the on -ramp literally in their backyards haven't been able to realize an effective wall against the traffic noise and exhaust pollution. There is also the question of their obtaining easements to access some of our backyard property to expand the on -ramp to 100 N from 77th Street. I as well as my neighbors would appreciate being informed of any potential of this occurring. In addition, currently the storm sewer drainage hole located between my property and that of my neighbor's to the south of me routinely overflows when we have heavy rains such that a large amount of debris of all sorts is left on our yards when the water subsides. This would only worsen if this development goes forward and something would have to be done to remedy the situation. These are my concerns regarding the Gateway development as a resident within the affected area. I would appreciate special consideration given to these issues as well as any feedback you could provide. Thank you. Bette Anderson 4936 Poppy Lane ` Edina,.MN 55435 952 - 486 -8834 betteedina@aol_com Get a sneak peek of the all -new AOL.com. 8/16/2007 Email - Cary Teague 20070815 080202AM.txt From: Cary Teague [cteague @ci.edina.mn.us] sent: Wednesday,, August 15, 2007 8 :02 AM To: Andrea Moffatt subject: Pw: Draft AUAR and 4455 w 77th Another comment... --------------------------------------------------- ------------------- ---- - - - - -- From: Jackie- 'Hoogen.akker ` Sent: Tuesday, August 141 2007 4 :14 PM To: Cary Teague subject: Fw; Draft AUAR and 4455 w 77thl. a ------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------- From: Neil Peterson [maiIto:petersonoffice @aol.com] sent: Tuesday, August"14, 2007 4:05 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker subject: Draft AUAR and 4455 w 77th I am Neil Peterson•,—and I am part of the ownership of a building at 4455 w 77th. I did testify at the hearing and am submitting a follow up E mail because of the storm last night (Monday 8/13) that supports my concern and frustration. I am convinced that the development you are proposing will exacerbate the 1) .flooding and 2). ground sinking that we and several neighbors are suffering. 1) Flooding: Last evening our back lot was completely underwater, draining across 77th and areas north. As the limited capacity in the swamp filled we became the storage area. I observed that our neighbor,especially the Hotel directly to the south share the same flooding, e and sinking problem. we are apparently the pro erties negatively impacted th most. 2� sinking: The parking and lawn perimeter -area of our building has sunk over.2 feet in the last few years. This year has been the worst. we once again have had to raise the driveways to even access the building, which may not be possible the next time because of the incline. our tenant is becoming increasingly irritated, as are we, especially as we see the development activity on the Bloomington side, and now this site, which will drain toward us too. My position: I understand that the water issue is that of the water shed District. i also know,th:e City of Bloomington and /or the District is permitting a sur= charging of the vacant . properties north of the pond area along the freeway. That "dewatering" I believe, contributes to our problem to the point that I am seeking professional engineering advice. Your plans t6-develop north. of our site and utilize this `same swamp as part of the i drainage, s really going to float us away. sincerely Lindue L L C Neil Peterson 9640 xylon ave so, Bloomington 55438 952 941.1822' Page 1 WSB & Associates, Inc. Infrastructure 1 Engineering 1 Planning 1 Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763- 541 -1700 Memorandum To: Ronald Wieland, Department of Natural Resources William Goff, Minnesota Department of Transportation James Nelson, Eberhardt Advisory Kevin Bigalke, Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Phyllis Hanson, Metropolitan Council Tom Gastler Robert Byers, Hennepin County Transportation Department Gene Winstead, Mayor of Bloomington Larry Lee, City of Bloomington Rick Beaver, Seagate Nels Nelson Bette Anderson Neil Peterson From: Andrea Moffatt Date: September 26, 2007 Re: Responses to Comments Draft A UAR — Gateway Study Area , Edina, MN WSB Project No. 1686 -04 On behalf of the City of Edina, please find outlined below responses to comments received on the Draft Gateway Study Area Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR). The comment period ended on August 15, 2007. Comments were received by the deadline from Eberhardt Advisory, LLC; Nine Mile Creek Watershed District; Metropolitan Council; Tom Gastler; Hennepin County Transportation Department; City of Bloomington; Rick Beaver (at Seagate); Nels Nelson; Bette Anderson; Neil Peterson (Lindue LLC). Comments were received after the deadline from MnDOT and the DNR. All comments received are outlined below with responses provided. The comment letters are also attached. Comments from DNR Comment 1: Item No. 17 Water Quality — Surface Water Runoff (pp. 40 -44): This item indicates that the existing storm water ponding is insufficient and that the receiving water, Nine Mile Creek, is impaired for turbidity, chloride and biota. This item suggests the use of low impact techniques to reduce impervious surfaces. Along that line, we might recommend that the developer utilize pervious pavement and pavers for parking lots and walkways, and design buildings with systems to capture and store precipitation for use in lawn watering, flush toilets, etc. This would help address both the storage and stream impairment problems. Response: This recommendation will be shared with any developers for the area. The City will also encourage the use of Low Impact Development techniques to address storm water management in the area. No change to the AUAR is needed. Minneapolis 1 St. Cloud Equal OpportunifllEMff (dy inlDocsIComment LetterslMEMO- Comment Response - 091107.doc Responses to Comments September 26, 2007 Page 2 Comments from MnDOT Comment 1: In reviewing the draft AUAR, there will be substantial increased traffic demands for TH. 100 (both directions) and I494 west of East Bush Lake Road (both directions). Please note that Mn/DOT has no immediate plans. to expand TH 100 or I494 in that area. Response: The City is aware that there are no immediate plans to expand TH 100 and I-494. No changes to AUAR are needed. Comment 2: Page 66, Table 21 -1 describes. its .source as "Derived from Highway Capacity Manual (2000) ". Level of Sery ice. is generally a measure of hourly Traffic flow, rather than a measure of daily traffic. It would be possible for the daily traffic to be at a level.that would appear uncongested, but for the peak periods, to still experience congestion. Therefore, the Level of Service should be derived from the peak period. Response: Capacity assessment based on daily traffic volumes has been removed from the Final AUAR, including removing Table 21 -1, Table 21 -7, and modification to Table 21 -14. The methodology used is a common planning level analysis for typical development. This methodology has shown to be less applicable to France Avenue due to the traffic flow patterns near a high volume interchange (I -494). Capacity assessment will be limited to peak hour traffic modeling. The Final AUAR has been revised. Comment 3: Mn /DOT has adopted Table 21 -3 as a universal freeway assessment standard. Therefore it is suggested that Table 21 -4 on Page 69 be removed and only Table 21 -3 be used. Response: Table 21 -4 Ramp Junction Level of Service Measures has been removed and Table 21- 21 Future (2014) Freeway Level of Service has been modified to use the Table 21 -3 Freeway Level of Service Measures Criteria. The Final AUAR has been revised. Comment 4: Throughout the document, there are several references, to Bush Lake Road. Mn/DOT believes these references should be East Bush Lake Road. Response: This change has been made to the Final. AUAR. Comment 5: There should be discussion regarding traffic impacts to the loops at the I- 494/France Avenue interchange. Also, Mn/DOT would - appreciate discussion of specific traffic impacts from the proposed redevelopment on the TH 100/1 -494 interchange, particularly the south to east movement. Even if these impacts cannot be easily mitigated, they should be quantified. Response: Ramp /loop analysis has been added to sections 21.B3 and 2 LC 1(ii) including ramp /loop volume increases and capacities. The Final AUAR has been revised. Comment 6: The mitigation plan includes construction of an eight -lane bridge at the TH 100/West 770' Street interchange. There is no funding allocated in Mn/DOT's 20 -Year Transportation System Plan for the reconstruction of this interchange. Response: The City is aware Mn/DOT has no plans or funding to improve the TH 100/West 77cn Street interchange in the 20 -year Transportation System Plan. No changes to the AUAR are needed. K: 101686- MAdmrnOocslComment LeffersWEMO- Comment. Response - 091107.doc Responses to Comments September 26, 2007 Page 3 Comment 7: Mn/DOT's policy is to assist local governments in promoting compatibility between land use and highways. Residential uses located adjacent to highways `often result in complaints about traffic noise. Traffic noise from this highway could exceed noise standards established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the U.S. Department of. Transportation. Minnesota Rule 7030.0030 states that municipalities are responsible for taking all reasonable measures to prevent land use activities listed in the MPCA's Noise Area Classification (NAC) where'the establishment-of the land use would result in violations of established noise standards. Mn/DOT policy regarding development adjacent to existing highways prohibits the expenditure of highway funds for noise mitigation measures in such areas. The project proposer should assess the noise situation and take the action deemed necessary to minimize the impact of any h'ighway'noise.. If you have any questions regarding Mn/DOT's noise policy please contact Peter Wasko in our Design section at (651) 234 -7681. Response: The City is aware that any noise mitigation measures would be addressed by'the City or Developer and would not have any Mn/DOT'funding participation. No changes to the AUAR.are needed. Comment 8: Any work impacting Mn/DOT right -of -way will also require a permit. Permit forms are available from Mn/DOT's utility website at www.dot.state.mn.us /teesup /utility. Please include one full size plan set and one 11" x 17" plan set with each permit application. Please direct any questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig, Mn/DOT's Metro Permits Section, at (651) 234 - 7911. Response: Any project proposer will be responsible for obtaining necessary permits. Permits from Mn/DOT are listed in Item 8 of the AUAR. No revisions to the AUAR are needed. Comments from Eberhardt Advisory Comment 1: The Draft AUAR represents a solid effort to address the potential environmental consequences of the redevelopment levels in the Gateway Study Area. With the addition of certain information more fully described below and other changes, the Gateway Study Area Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review ( "Final AUAR") and the Final Mitigation Plan for Gateway Study Area ( "Final Mitigation Plan") should accurately and completely portray these consequences. Response: No response is necessary. Comment 2: 6. Description, B. Description of Redevelopment Scenarios, Tables 6 -2 and 6 -3. Gateway Development's proposal for development on the Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quads sites results in significantly less development than Scenario 2. We have reproduced below Tables 6 -2 and 6 -3 and added lines labeled "21)" that show the density of Gateway Development's proposal to indicate this difference. K.-W 1686- 041A&Wn0ocs Comment LetterslMEMO- Comment Response - 091107.Joc X. Responses to Comments September 26, 2607 Page 4 Table 6 -2. Summary of Redevelopment Scenarios* * Calculations do not take into account existing or proposed wetlands, storm ponds, roads, right -of -way, or utility easements in the Gateway Study Area. 'Acreage includes mixed use development with commercial, retail, and office space applications. b Acreage includes mixed use development with office space applications. Table 6 -3_ Comnarison of Redevelonment Scenarios with Existing, Conditions Existing Office Space Office Space, Retail & Housing & Hotel °_ Conditions Comp Plan Warehousing, & Commercial Residential Maximum Light Industrial (Mixe&Use) (Mixed Use) Residential v Plan Office 1,546,000 1,862,000 1,168,000? 3,261,000 1,094,000 Commercial/ 15,000 174,000 6 15,000 6 Retail/Hotel 6 6 6 L W v G 4; p- C H O'er O 0 7 O C� O 1,296,000 03 C y O'er G R C N Q..0 N p C N Industrial Mix ` E Residential `� E Q N `� E D `�'E a E 1,904,000 FA 4,246,000 0 4,603,000 `� 1 122.68. .70.95 1.546 49:59 1.296 2.14 0.015 36 - - - 2 122.68 -31.84 1.862 .49.59 1.296 41.25° 0.094 856 0.914 150 0.080 2D ' ` • 39.1 11.08 1.168 0 0 1.8 .080 820 .883 150 .080 3 12168 70.95 3.261 49.59 ' 1.296 2A4 0.015 36 - - - 4 122.68 31.84 1.094 49.59 1.296 41.25 b 0.015 1,536 1.581 - - * Calculations do not take into account existing or proposed wetlands, storm ponds, roads, right -of -way, or utility easements in the Gateway Study Area. 'Acreage includes mixed use development with commercial, retail, and office space applications. b Acreage includes mixed use development with office space applications. Table 6 -3_ Comnarison of Redevelonment Scenarios with Existing, Conditions The level of development proposed by Gateway Development does require a comprehensive plan amendment. This comment is an observation to clarify what Gateway Development is proposing. We do not believe these tables need to be added to the Final AUAR Response: The City recognizes that the magnitude of Scenario 2 redevelopment outlined in Tables 6 -2 and 6 -3 in the AUAR represent the entire: study area and not just the specific site redevelopment in the Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quads site. The specifics of the Pentagon Towers and Quads site are summarized in the text in Item 6. No changes to the AUAR are needed. K:101686- 04U&ninlDocslComment LetterslMEMO- Comment Response - 091107.doc Existing Scenario 1: Scenario 2: Scenario Scenario 3: Scenario 4: Conditions Comp Plan Master 2D: Maximum Maximum Plan Developer's Commercial Residential Plan Office 1,546,000 1,862,000 1,168,000? 3,261,000 1,094,000 Commercial/ 15,000 174,000 160,000 15,000 15,000 Retail/Hotel 1,873,000 Office & 1,296,000 1,296,000 0 1,296,000 1,296,000 Light Industrial Mix Residential 31,000 31,000 914,000 883,000 31;000 1,581,000 TOTAL: 1,904,000 2,888,000 4,246,000 2,211,000? 4,603,000 3,986,000 The level of development proposed by Gateway Development does require a comprehensive plan amendment. This comment is an observation to clarify what Gateway Development is proposing. We do not believe these tables need to be added to the Final AUAR Response: The City recognizes that the magnitude of Scenario 2 redevelopment outlined in Tables 6 -2 and 6 -3 in the AUAR represent the entire: study area and not just the specific site redevelopment in the Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quads site. The specifics of the Pentagon Towers and Quads site are summarized in the text in Item 6. No changes to the AUAR are needed. K:101686- 04U&ninlDocslComment LetterslMEMO- Comment Response - 091107.doc Responses to Comments September 26, 2007 Page 5 Comment 3: 6. Description, C. Anticipated Infrastructure Improvements, p. 20 -21. The Transportation paragraph fails to identify traffic mitigation measures that are already needed or will be needed based on already approved developments and expected increases in background traffic. Please see the more complete comment on this point in Paragraph 2.9. Response: This section defines traffic mitigation measures needed to address redevelopment of the entire study area. Specific mitigation measures needed for a specific redevelopment project will be addressed through a separate process such as the redevelopment plan review process or through a request for this information outside of the AUAR process. The Final AUAR was revised to include an additional mitigation measure to address this issue. Comment 4: Project Magnitude Data, Project Magnitude Mitigation Plan, p. 22. The text states that building heights may range "up to 14 stories for a proposed hotel." The hotel proposed by Gateway Development is seven stories high, not 14 stories. Office buildings on the Pentagon Towers site may reach 14 stories. This information should be corrected in the Final AUAR. Response: The reference to a proposed 14 -story hotel has been removed from the Final AUAR and replaced with reference to a proposed 14 -story office building. Comment 5: 7. Project Magnitude Data, Project Magnitude Mitigation Plan, p. 22 -23. This mitigation measure implies that variances are the only way to gain approval for project components that exceed Edina City Code requirements. A project proposer could also seek to amend Edina City Code, and this option should be added to the Final AUAR. Response: The Final AUAR has been revised to indicate that a project proposer could also seek to amend the City Code. Comment 6: 8. Permits and Approvals, Table 8 -1, p. 23 -24. Under the Geologic Hazards and Soil Conditions Mitigation Plan in the fourth bullet on p.63, the text suggests that permanent dewatering would need to be approved by the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. This approval needs to be added to Table 8- 1. Response: This permit has been added to Table 8 -1. Comment 7: 17. Water Quality — Surface Water Runoff, Water Quality — Surface Water Runoff Mitigation Plan, p. 44. We do not understand the reference here in the third bullet to a reduction in runoff volume "so as not to negatively impact the existing storm sewer system." We understand the need to reduce runoff volume to meet the City's and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District's storm water standards. We cannot find any discussion in the Draft AUAR, however, about existing storm water volumes negatively impacting the storm sewers or any thresholds for volume reductions needed to eliminate this impact. This needs to be clarified in the Final AUAR. Response: This mitigation item relates to the analysis on Page 41 about the capacity of the existing storm sewer system and Figure 17 -1. There are several manholes that surcharge during a 10 -year storm event. Therefore, the mitigation item addresses the need to prevent aggravation to the system by sending more water to the storm sewer that already surcharges during some storm events. No change to the Final AUAR is needed. K- 01686- UAdminlDo&Comment LetterslMEMO- Comment Response - 091107.doc Responses to Comments September 26, 2007 Page 6 Comment 8: 18. Water Quality — Wastewater, Impacts of Development Scenarios, p. 49. The text in the first full paragraph on page 49 states that there are no other known developments occurring within Sanitary Sewer Districts A or B outside the Gateway Study Area that would impact Lift Station No. 10 or 6. No information or conclusion on this subject is offered for Sanitary Sewer District C. This missing information should be added to the Final AUAR. Response: Sanitary Sewer -District C does not extend beyond the Gateway Study Area. As such, no reference to potential development outside the Gateway Area was made for this District. This information has been added to the Final AUAR. Comment 9: 19. Geologic Hazards and Soil Conditions, Geologic Hazards and Soil Conditions Mitigation Plan, p. 63. The first bullet indicates that a project's Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan ( "S)"PP ") will be reviewed as part of the platting process. This review will occur as part of the City's general review process, the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District's permit review, and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's NPDES /SDS Construction Stone Water Permit review. We do not think the SWPPP will be subject to review during the platting process. This should be corrected in the Final AUAR. Response: This statement was found on Page 39 in Item 16. The mitigation item has been revised to state that the SWPPP will need to be reviewed by Edina. Reference to when this review would occur has been removed. Comment 10: 21. Traffic, p. 65 -109. We have three main concerns related to the traffic analysis and traffic mitigation plan: The mitigation measures required as a result of existing conditions, background growth, and cumulative project impacts are not defined. The mitigation measures provide no means to determine when each measure is necessary or how it will be determined which landowner triggers which improvements. There is no indication whether the proposed mitigation measures can be constructed without major right -of -way or building impacts. Existing and Background Growth. Even though the Draft AUAR is not required to evaluate a no build alternative, a complete traffic analysis should evaluate background traffic increases and the cumulative impacts of projects planned or under construction. Otherwise the City cannot separate the redevelopment scenario traffic impacts from background traffic impacts and cumulative project impacts. For example, the existing conditions described in the Draft AUAR indicate at least two intersections that currently operate at level of service ( "LOS ") E and three that operate at LOS D in the PM peak hour (Table 21 -8). The freeway analysis also shows one merge /ramp junction that operates at LOS F and several more at LOS D in the PM peak hour (Table 21 -9). Based on existing conditions, it is fully expected that background growth alone will result in additional intersection LOS impacts by year 2014 and 2030. But except for Table 21 -21, which includes a 2014 No Build analysis, the Draft AUAR fails to provide this information. The distinction between redevelopment traffic impacts versus background impacts and cumulative project impacts should be disclosed in the Final AUAR and Final Mitigation Plan. To do so, a no -build evaluation should be included in Tables 21 -14 through 21 -20 of the Draft AUAR. Response: Each proposed redevelopment within the Gateway Area will be evaluated by the City prior to approval. The evaluation/study will determine which mitigation measures are necessary to adequately facilitate traffic generated within the specific proposed development, at what year the K: 101686 -041Ad ninlDocslComment LetterslMEMO- Comment Response - 091107.doc Responses to Comments September 26, 2007 Page 7 mitigated improvements_ are needed, and quantify the'portion of expense for the mitigation the specific development is responsible for. No changes to the Final AUAR are needed. Comment 11: Mitigation Thresholds. The way the Roadway Improvements Mitigation Plan reads currently, the City's intent on when mitigation measures will be implemented is unclear. One could argue, the way the measures are currently written, that no measures are needed prior to 2014, and some not until 2030. Or it could be interpreted that no redevelopment can occur between. now and 2014 until all the 2014 measures are in place, and none between 2014�and 2030 until all the_2030 measures are in place. We do not believe the City intended either of these interpretations, thus additional information is needed in the Final. AUAR. Since the LOS impact evaluation is based on.the number of trips in lhe'AM and PM peak hours, traffic improvements could be linked to trip thresholds. Thresholds should first reflect, improvements triggered by background trip growth and cumulative project trip growth and then improvements triggered by redevelopment net trip increases. As to redevelopment. attention would also need to be paid to the location of the redevelopment. For example, redevelopment on the west end of the Study Area is less likely to create trip increases on France Avenue as compared to development on the east end of the Study Area. The net increase in trips would also take into account the reduction of trips as a result of existing users being replaced with new users. For example, removal of 500 trips and the addition of 300 should not result in triggering any mitigation measures. Adding trip thresholds for each mitigation measure in the Final AUAR would help developers and public officials to plan for redevelopment. However, given the number of redevelopment levels and locations and the number of mitigation locations, this may not be feasible in the Final AUAR. If not, then a mitigation measure should be added that requires each project proposer to prepare a traffic study that analyzes the traffic impacts of its proposed redevelopment (or redevelopment phase) and identifies any traffic mitigation measures triggered by it. Response: See response to Comment 10. Comment 12: Mitigation Feasibility. The Roadway Improvement Mitigation Plan provides no indication whether each proposed mitigation measures is feasible or practical. For example, the.reconstruction of the TH100/776' Street interchange for Scenario 3 would require MnDOT to reconstruct the existing bridge. This is not something the City or Study Area landowners could be required to do, since they, have no jurisdiction over this interchange. As another example, can the additional thru lane proposed on France Avenue be added without removing existing buildings or acquisition of additional right of way? In the Final AUAR, the feasibility and responsibility for the traffic mitigation measures should receive additional analysis. Response: The indicated traffic. mitigation measures are required for the level of development proposed for each scenario. The financial obligation for a specific improvement may limit the practicality of the proposed development. Often times large scale improvements are not fully funded by a single development. It is common for a deyelopment to only be responsible for their portion of the improvement proportional to the traffic generated from the proposed site. No changes: on the AUAR are needed. Comment 13: 24. Odors, Noise, and Dust, Noise Analysis, p. 99. Noise receptor R3 is identified as being "in an existing residential development." 'What does "in" mean? Inside a building? Inside a courtyard? The Final AUAR should clarify this. Response: The location of a noise receptor is chosen using the following MPCA location criteria: K.M1686- 04UdminlDocslComment LettersUEMO{bmment Response - 091107.doc Responses to Comments September 26, 2007 Page 8 Measurements must be made at or within the applicable Noise Area Classification at the point_ of human activity nearest the noise source; must be made outdoors; Mcasurements must be made at least three feet off the ground and away from natural or manmade structures which would prevent an accurate measurement (barriers, houses).`'! No changes to the AUAR are needed. :. Comment 14: 24. Odors, Noise, and Dust, Noise Analysis, p. 99 -100. The text describes why the locations of noise receptors RI through R4 were chosen but gives no reasons for choosing the locations of receptors R5 and R6. This information should be provided in the Final AUAR. ., Response: The text should have included R5 and R6 with R4 as commercial locations''. The Final AUAR has been changed.. Comment 15: 24. Odors, Noise; and Dust, Noise Analysis and Tables 24 -2 and 24 -4, p. 100 -101. On page 100, it indicates that all residential noise receptors are shown in bold in Tables 24 -2 and 24 -3: But receptor R3, which is identified on page 99 as being in a residential development, is not represented in bold in either table. This should be corrected in the Final AUAR. Response: This has been changed in the Final AUAR. Comment 16: 24. Odors, Noise, and Dust, Table 24 -3, p. 101. Receptors R3 and R6 are on opposite sides of West 77h Street, approximately the same distance from the roadway. Yet in Table 24 -3 the noise levels differ between the receptors by 10+ decibels or double the noise level. This needs to be checked or � 7- explained before publication of the Final AUAR. Response: The R3 receptor location is.near the existing industrial Seagate building and closer to I- 494, therefore having a louder decibel reading. No changes in the AUAR are needed. Comment 17: 24. Odors, Noise, and Dust, Odors, Noise, and Dust Mitigation Measures, p. 102. The mitigation measure in the third bullet would be more helpful if it noted that the applicable noise abatement requirements to conform to state standards can be found in Minn. Rules 7030.005 0, subp. 3. This should be added to the Final AUAR. Response: This change has been made to the Final AUAR. Comment 18. 26. Visual Impacts, Visual Impacts Mitigation Plan, p. 103. This mitigation measure implies that variances are the only way to gain approval for project components that exceed Edina City Code requirements. A project proposer could also seek to amend Edina City Code, and this option should be added to the Final AUAR. See also comment in Comment 5. Response: See response to Comment No. 5 Comment 19: [The following comments were also submitted with this letter. Responses relate back to previous comments] • Land Use Compatibility and Permitting, A4, p. 8. As to mitigation measure A4, see the Comments 5 and 16. K. 101 686- 041AdminlDo&Comment LetterslMEMO- Comment Response - 091107.doc Responses to Comments September 26, 2007 Page 9 • Geologic Hazards, Erosion control, and Hazardous Material, B4, p. 8. As to mitigation measure B4, see Comment 9. • Water quality and Quantity Mitigation Plan, E3, p. 11. As to mitigation measure E3, see Comment 7. • Traffic and Transportation, p. 12 -13. For comments on mitigation measures G -1 through G3, see Comment 10. • .Odor, Noise, and Dust, H3, p. 13. As to mitigation measure H3, see Comment 15. Response: Responses are included with previous comments. Comment 20: Cumulative Impacts,,p. 14. As we read the Draft AUAR, there are several more places where Edina proposes to cooperate with other jurisdictions to address cumulative impact, for example, with Bloomington and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed-District and with the Metropolitan Council on sanitary sewer capacity. All these efforts should be listed in the Final AUAR. Response: The AUAR includes mitigation measures to coordinate with Bloomington, Metropolitan Council, and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District.. These are listed in the Mitigation Plan as D1, D6, E8, F1, nd F2. A reference to these other mitigation measures will be included with the Cumulative Impacts measures. Comments from Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Comment 1: As stated in the AUAR,,.permits will be needed from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District ( NMCWD) before any construction activities on the project can commence. Response: No response is necessary. No changes to the AUAR are needed. Comment 2: The AUAR mentions the need to address rate and volume control of storm water. The NMCWD is currently in a rule- making process that will require rate and volume control. The NMCWD would encourage the developer,to follow the proposed new rules to help reduce storm water runoff rates and volumes. Response: This comment will be shared with potential developers. No changes to the AUAR are needed. Comment 3: As mentioned above, the NMCWD is currently developing new rules. These rules will include wetlands, storm water management, sediment and erosion control, and floodplains. The storm water management rule will require rate and volume control for all developments and redevelopments. The NMCWD is considering a volume control requirement that will require the retention on site of the first one (1) inch of runoff generated from all impervious surfaces from existing conditions for the 2 -, 10 -, and 100 - year storm events. It is anticipated that the new rules will be adopted in early 2008. Response: Any redevelopment in the area will be required to meet the current standards of the various permitting agencies. No changes to the AUAR are needed. Comment 4: Water quality treatment of storm water will need to provide removal efficiencies of at least 60% for phosphorus and at least 80% for total suspended solids. Response: This comment will be shared with potential developers. As areas redevelop, the City will encourage the use of Low Impact Design techniques and projects will be required to meet the K:101686- 04UdminlOocslComment LettersMEMO- Comment Response - 091107.doc Responses to Comments September 26, 2007 Page 10 policies of the Watershed District. The MPCA's Storm Water Manual anticipates removal . efficiencies" for selected LID practices to be between 60% and 100% for Total Phosphorus and 80% to 95% for Total Suspended Solids. No changes to the AUAR are needed. Comment 5: Maintenance of storm water management facilities will be critical to ensuring the long -term viability of such facilities. Maintenance plans that identify and protect the design, capacity, and functionality of storm water management structures should be developed. Response:' A mitigation measure stating4hat privately constructed and maintained stone water management facilities will require that axriaintenance plan be reviewed.and approved by the NMCWD'has been added to the Final AUAR. Comment 6: The NMCWD is pleased to see that Low`Impact Development (LID) techniques are being encouraged;by >the City of Edina. The NMCWD also encourages the use of LID techniques to reduce impervious surface of developments and help reduce storm,water runoff. Response: No response is necessary. No changes to the AUAR are needed. Comment 7: As the AUAR stated, Nine Mile Creek is listed on [the] State's impaired maters list for turbidity, biota, and chlorides. The NMCWD is working the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency to develop TMDL studies for these impairments. The NMCWD encourages the developer to identify practices that will reduce the runoff of sediments and chlorides from the project sites. This will help improve the water quality of Nine Mile Creek. Response: This comment will be provided the potential developers. No changes to the AUAR are needed. Comments from Metropolitan Council Comment 1: The`DAUAR doesn't mention bus service. In addition to being a significant mode of transportation, bus transit service is also a potential method of mitigating traffic congestion in the AUAR study area. The high- density development proposed in Scenarios 2, 3 and 4 would support increased transit use, especially if high - density housing is provided as proposed in Scenario 4. This is supported in the DAUAR document, (page 107), where it states, "As the general population of Edina continues to age, there will be an increasing need for senior housing, `especially in mixed -use developments where. acquisition of personal goods and services do not require driving." The final AUAR, ( FAUAR) should address transit service. Metro Transit's main concern regarding the DAUAR is for pedestrian safety and pedestrian access to transit - facilities. Access to transit and pedestrian/transit facilities are generally deficient in the study area and, in addition, will be negatively affected in the development scenarios proposed in the DAUAR. The City's "Draft Mitigation Plan" for the Gateway Study Area found on the blue pages 8 through 14, addresses traffic and transportation mitigation in Section G. The measures described in the mitigation plan seem to accommodate: automobiles to the exclusion of other modes, such as bicycle and pedestrian traffic. The measures described add additional through lanes on already wide, pedestrian = unfriendly roads such as France Ave. (at Minnesota Drive) and double left turn and double right turn lanes at most of the intersections. Neither sidewalks nor pedestrian access are mentioned. This is a real concern for transit service in the Gateway Study Area because bus riders are also pedestrians. Particular areas of concern for improved access and facilities include: K- 101686- 04WminV)ocsIComment LettersUEMO- Comment Response - 091107.doc Responses to Comments September 26, 2007 Page I 1 1. Route 540/76th — 77th Street. The key bus route in the Gateway Study area is Route 540 76th /771h Street. This route provides a cross -town service from the Edina industrial area west of Hwy. 100 to the Mall of America. Plans call for improved route frequency and the extension of the route to the Normandale Lakes Office Park in Bloomington. 2. Route 6/France Avenue. Metro Transit provides frequent service on France Ave. to /from Minneapolis to the Gateway Study Area via Route 6. Increased service is planned along France Avenue for this route and better pedestrian facilities are needed. 3. France Ave., Minnesota Drive, Parklawn Ave. and W. 77`h Street. These streets have inadequate sidewalks in most. areas. Sidewalks are discontinuous, most notably along France Ave. northbound and along W. 77`h St. westbound. Where sidewalks exist, they are narrow, yet next to high volume roadways. Most bus stops are not currently ADA compliant. Response: With each development proposal, the City requires a specific travel demand management (TDM) plan that addresses transit service as well as pedestrian accommodations. In addition, the City's Transportation Plan, currently being prepared, will address the transit issues and pedestrian issues in this area. A section has been added to the Final AUAR to discuss the existing transit service and outlines general mitigation measures. Comment 2: These safety deficits should be addressed by the FAUAR. How and where will sidewalks, not just roads, be widened or provided in this study area? In addition to addressing safety concerns, the FAUAR also needs to describe improvements to non - motorized access both to and within the Gateway Study Area to create an up -to -date plan that recognizes the alternatives that exist to the single occupant automobile. There should be a section on this subject added to the FAUAR, complete with maps that, a) show existing bus stop locations and those stops requiring improvements to be ADA compliant, and b) document the sidewalk system and facilities as they now exist and how these systems should be enhanced. The City should also address pedestrian access to transit in its comprehensive plan update, (CPU). Response: See response to Comment 1 above. In addition, a mitigation measure to address pedestrian use and sidewalk/trails has been added to the Final AUAR. Comment 3: Comprehensive Plan. The City's 2008 CPU should incorporate policy and implementation measures to mitigate the effects of redevelopment in the Gateway Study Area. The DAUAR, page 104 indicates that implementing Scenarios 2, 3 and 4 would require the City's current comprehensive plan to be amended to allow for the proposed land uses and densities. The FAUAR should provide details on how such mitigation will be addressed in the City's 2008 CPU and/or in a comprehensive plan amendment (CPA). Response: The City anticipates that a Comprehensive Plan Amendment will be submitted to address a specific development within the Gateway Study Area, ahead of the 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update that is underway. The City's 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update is anticipated to reflect any amendment that may occur. With a specific development plan, the mitigation measures outlined within the AUAR will need to be adhered to and this would be part of any CPA approvals. This process is outlined in Item 27 of the AUAR. Comment 4: Population and Household Forecasts. Edina is estimated to have 21,100 households currently; the 2030 forecast is 22,500. Should the City decide to pursue development options 2 or 4, it will need to request the Council to revise (increase) Edina's household and population forecasts. K.-W1686- 04Udmin0ocslComment LettersNEMO- Comment Response - 091107.doc Responses to Comments September 26, 2007 Page 12 Response: If any of the development scenarios are pursued that would increase the City's households, the City of Edina would request the Met Council to revise its forecasts accordingly as part of an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. Comment 5: Employment Forecasts Development Scenarios 2 and 3 would allow for gross employment growth in Edina. The Metropolitan Council has forecasted Edina employment to grow from 53,000 in 2000 to 62,400 in 2030. So far this decade, Edina employment has declined substantially to a current estimate of 49,300. Even with development options 2 or 3, Edina is unlikely to reach its current 2030 Metropolitan System Statement employment forecast. Response: Under any of the four development scenarios, Edina would concur that it will not likely reach the Metropolitan Council's employment forecast for 2030. Comment 6: Plan and Zoning Ordinance Compatibility. State law considers a zoning ordinance to be an implementing measure for a comprehensive plan. Land uses allowed in a zoning district must also be allowed in the designated land use guiding applied to an area in the comprehensive plan. This must be taken into account as the City develops a CPA for the AUAR site and /or rezones properties in the AUAR study area. Response: The City will take this into account during the CPA and rezoning process. No change to the AUAR is needed. Comment 7: Item 18: Water Quality — Wastewater It appears that the regional disposal system that provides service to the AUAR study area is currently operating near its full design capacity and has insufficient capacity to accommodate the additional flows generated by the AUAR development (all alternatives). The projected wastewater flow, as outlined under each of the four development Scenarios, would cause a system impact to the Metropolitan Disposal System. However, the information in the DAUAR is not of sufficient detail to determine the precise impact of the AUAR development scenarios to the regional disposal system. Therefore, Council staff has determined that the DAUAR report is incomplete to determine the full impact to the regional disposal system. The FAUAR needs to contain more detailed information related to the specific Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quad project (including staging, timing and additional flows). Once this information is available, a meeting between the Metropolitan Council staff and City of Edina staff will be necessary to discuss both short term and long term service options available for this area of the City. Response: Edina Staff and Met Council Staff met to determine the Met Council's needs with respect to this comment. The Met Council needed additional specific information related to specific flows from the Gateway Study Area, but this information did not need to be included in the AUAR. A letter was sent to Met Council on August 21, 2007 with this information. A follow up phone call with Kyle Colvin at Met Council indicated that the information in the August 21 letter was sufficient to address their needs. A copy of the August 21 letter is attached. No changes to the AUAR are needed. Comment 8: Item 21, Traffic The DAUAR appears accurate and complete regarding the analysis of related road and intersection impacts. Mitigation strategies such as additional turn lanes and lane extensions will be needed at various intersections within the study area to accommodate traffic from the different scenarios. Scenario 3 will have the largest impact to I -494 and TH 100 although deficiencies in weave segments and ramp junctions were attributable to K.-W]686- 04L4dmin0o&Comment LetterslMEMO- Comment Response - 091107.doc Responses to Comments September 26, 2007 Page 13 increases in mainline volumes, rather than the increase in redevelopment traffic at the ramps. Expansion of I -494 between Highway 100 and TH 77 is included in the regional transportation plan as an expansion project needed by 2030. However, it is not included in Mn/DOT's 10 year work plan and no funds are identified for it at this time. Response: The City is aware Mn/DOT has no plans or funding to improve I -494 in the 10 -year Work Plan. No change to the AUAR is needed. Comments from Tom Gastler Comment 1: I did not see any reference to how the possible development options would affect the storm drainage to the north. I know that some improvements were made after the 1987 mega storm but wonder if redevelopment of this area would negatively impact the storm drainage coming from 72nd down Parklawn Ave? ' Response: Figure 17 -1 of the AUAR shows the drainage boundaries surrounding the AUAR study area. The drainage divide is south of 72nd Street West, with runoff being conveyed to the south. Redevelopment in this area will need to limit peak runoff rates so as not to negatively impact the existing storm sewer system. Based on this, the storm sewer serving upstream areas, such as the area north of the AUAR study area, will not be impacted by the proposed redevelopment. No changes to the AUAR are needed. Comment 2: I noticed that there might be some dewatering required; possibly permanent dewatering. How would this impact Lake Edina? Given that there is a possibility that Southdale's water based heating/cooling permit might not be renewed so that water flow might be stopped. If I understand the mechanics some of that water currently ends up in Lake Edina. Without this and with additional dewatering would the lake be negatively impacted? Response: If permanent dewatering is required, the developers of each individual site will be required to prepare a dewatering plan that will minimize impacts to nearby water bodies. It is anticipated that these permanent dewatering systems will utilize a cut -off "slurry wall" or some type of foundation system that will limit the impacts of dewatering to a small, localized area. Modifications to Southdale Mall's heating and cooling system are beyond the scope of this AUAR. No changes to the AUAR are needed. Comment 3: There was a very brief mention of the possible effects on police & fire in this report. Is this something that is covered in the actual development planning or should more detail be given in this report? Response: The City is responsible for providing fire and police protection to residents and landowners in the City. The AUAR needs only to identify this item. No additional analysis and is needed in the AUAR. The City routinely reviews the needs of public safety in the community and adjusts as necessary. Comments from Hennepin County Transportation Department Comment 1: Existing and Future Roadway Operations for France Avenue. We were somewhat surprised by the AUAR's portrayal of the existing operations of France Avenue as being "uncongested" today. We perceive that this is not the case, and believe that perhaps the erroneous conclusion was reached in part due to the methodology used for the planning level analysis discussed on page 66. K.101686- 041Adm1nV)ocsIComment LettersWEMO- Comment Response - 09 1107.doc Responses to Comments September 26, 2007 Page 14 Response: Capacity assessment based on daily traffic volumes has been removed from the Final AUAR, including removing Table 21 -1, Table 21 -7, and modifications to Table 21 -14. This methodology used is a common planning level analysis for typical development. This. methodology has shown to be less applicable to France Avenue due.to the traffic,flow patters near a high volume interchange (I -494): Capacity assessment will be limited to peak hour traffic modeling. The Final AUAR has been revised. Comment 2: Individual lane utilization is very unbalanced on France Avenue due to the high volume of turning vehicles. This unbalanced lane utilization'leads to spillback that affects multiple intersections along the corridor. The Highway Capacity Manual methods for arterial roadways- do not account for this type of phenomenon. One good example of this type of occurrence is the southbound movement from France Avenue to I -494. The rightmost southbound lane experiences a very high utilization due.to the fact that both the westbound ramp and eastbound loop to I -494 are on the right side. Drivers typically try to anticipate the upcoming turn a few blocks in advance, so the spillback on a typical p.m. peak hour`often stretches from West 78`h Street back almost to West 76`h Street. Our studies have found that 55% of the southbound p.m. peak hour traffic is actually destined to these two ramps to I -494. Response:. The arterial level of service assessment was completed using the SimTraffic micro - simulation traffic analysis software. SimTraffic is designed to model networks of signalized and unsignalized intersections. SimTraffic is especially useful for analyzing complex situations that are not easily modeled macroscopically (using Highway Capacity Manual methods) including: • Closely spaced intersections with blocking problems • Closely spaced intersections with lane change problems • The effects of signals on nearby unsignalized intersections and driveways • The operation of intersections under heavy congestion All of theses issues are present in the Gateway Area, therefore SimTraffic was the tool chosen to analyze the traffic operations, and is the Mn/DOT accepted tool for arterial traffic analysis. No changes to the AUAR are needed. Comment 3: We have recently retimed our signals to improve the progression on France Avenue which has reduced these spillback queues somewhat, however, adding many hundreds of vehicles in the peak hour onto southbound France Avenue will likely have a significant impact. Response: The revised signal timing.was provided by Tim Mrozek in July, 2007 and incorporated into the traffic analysis. No changes -to the AUAR are needed. Comment 4: Anticipated Traffic Growth. The AUAR asserts that background growth was added to account for other area developments, however the report's volumes show only a very slight addition beyond the trips added by the proposed development scenarios. For example, the base 2005 ADT of 28,700 on France Avenue between West 76`h Street to Minnesota Drive (Table 21 -7) is only projected to grow to 29,600 ADT by 2030 for Scenarios 1 and 4 (Table 21 -14). This is only about a 3% growth in 25 years for the proposed development including background growth. The average Hennepin County roadway is growing about 2% per year (64% increase in 25 years). The recent Greater Southdale Area Study completed for Edina in 2005 projected a background traffic growth rate KJ01686- 04U&nin0ocs1Commen1 LetterslMEMO- Comment Response - 091107.doc Responses to Comments September 26, 2007 Page 15 of 0.5% per year (13% increase in 25 years). The Southdale Study, also anticipated an overall 30% increase in area tripmaking over the next 20 years due to redevelopment and new mixed uses. Response: Table 21 -14 and associated text was revised. The Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume forecast have been revised. The forecast methodology used to derive the peak hour traffic forecast has been applied to the daily traffic forecasts. The revised forecast ADT's show an annual growth rate more similaaz to the 0.5% listed in previous studies. Comments from City of Bloomington Comment 1: Wastewater. Properties in Bloomington and in most of the Gateway Study Area of Edina rely upon MCES Interceptor BN-499 for wastewater service. Recent City of Bloomington flow monitoring shows that the MCES interceptor is near full capacity today in the vicinity of 84th Street and France Avenue. Given present conditions, no additional flow can be added in the portion of Bloomington and Edina upstream of 84'h and, France without danger of property damage from interceptor surcharges. Edina, Bloomington, and WSB representatives have met with MCES officials to discuss the interceptor concerns. MCES is currently reviewing existing flows and development forecasts in order to make a decision on future improvements to the MCES interceptor near 84` and France. In addition to the long -term solution of replacing a segment of the interceptor with larger pipe, the Draft AUAR points out that a potential short -term partial solution involves adjusting the pumping cycles at MCES Lift Station #10 to reduce the peaking characteristics of flows downstream. Bloomington looks forward to working with Edina and MCES on a regionally funded solution to the MCES interceptor capacity constraints that will allow development in the Gateway Study Area to proceed in a timely fashion. Ideally, these discussions will be far enough along' 10 allow the Final AUAR to include: • Information on the timing of potential MCES improvements and therefore the time constraints on the commencement of redevelopment within the Gateway Study Area and • Information on the extent to which modifications to the pumping cycles at MCES Lift Station #10 could free capacity downstream in MCES Interceptor BN -499. Response: Additional meetings with MCES, Bloomington, and Edina have occurred after the comment period. Edina will continue to work with the MCES and Bloomington to develop a solution to this-issue Additional information on specific known development in the AUAR area (the Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quads site) has bee en submitted to ;the MCES. The" specific solution to address the interceptor issue will be analyzed by MCES in the upcoming weeks. No changes have been made to the AUAR. Comment 2: Storm Water Management. Bloomington anticipates additional discussions with Edina on the potential expansion of South Pond (also commonly, referred to as the "Border Basin ") to improve the management of storm water quality and quantity in the area. Thinking of long -term redevelopment in the area, Bloomington would like to see South Pond expanded in a manner that would maximize its ability to serve as an amenity. Bloomington has considered enhancement of South Pond in the past, but has delayed submitting a petition to the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District due to an area landowner request that relates to soil stability. The Cities of Edina and Bloomington should work with Nine Mile Creek Watershed District to discuss storm water quantity and quality improvement alternatives that are sensitive to area conditions, including soils. K. 101 686 -04U&nin1Docs1Comment LetterslMEMO- Comment Response - 091107.doc Responses to Comments September 26, 2007 Page 16 Response: Edina will continue to work with Bloomington and Nine Mile Creek Watershed District to construct improvements to this basin while taking into account the soils in the area. Comment 3: Transportation. One traffic mitigation strategy not mentioned in the Draft AUAR is the addition of westbound I494 access at.East Bush Lake Road. Bloomington has been working on this strategy with the Federal Highway Administration and Mn/DOT for several years. The addition of westbound I -494 access at East Bush Lake Road would benefit the Gateway Study Area and merits special mention in the Final AUAR and inclusion in the mitigation plan. Bloomington looks forward to working cooperatively with Edina to encourage construction of westbound I -494 access at East Bush Lake Road. Response: It is noted that theadditional: access to westbound 1 -494 from East Bush Lake Road would benefit the redevelopment of the Gateway Area. The City of Edina,"" together with the City of Bloomington, have agreed to study this area in more detail. No changes to the AUAR are needed. Comment 4: Transportation. Another mitigation strategy not mentioned in the Draft AUAR that merits consideration for the Final AUAR. is the creation of a continuous east -west parallel arterial north of I -494 from France Avenue to East Bush Lake. Road. This strategy would involve realigning V4 Street,;77`h Street, and Edina Industrial Boulevard to serve as one continuous parallel arterial, similar to American Boulevard on the south side of 1 -494. This improvement would facilitate improved traffic flow while encouraging additional redevelopment in the area. Response: Changes have been made to Section 21.13 Roadway Improvements Mitigation Plan. The Final AUAR includes discussing the need for further study of site circulation and the development of a continuous east -west parallel arterial north of I -494 through Edina. The Final AUAR has been revised. Comment 5: Transportation. Figure 21 -4 and the text on Page 82 indicate that the same trip distribution assumptions were used for each of the four development scenarios. Bloomington requests that Edina reexamine this assumption in the Final AUAR given that varying land use, scenarios. (residential vs. non- residential uses for example) typically result in varying trip distribution, especially in regards to inbound vs. outbound trips during the AM and PM peak periods. From a'Bloomington perspective, the assumed trip distribution to /from the east on I -494 and to /from the south on Normandale Boulevard seems low for all,four scenarios. The trip distribution assumption from the west -on I -494 and W. 78`h Street seems high in the PM period. _ Response: Different trip distributions for each land use scenario proposed were reviewed. It was determined that the different scenarios would have very similar distributions. Each land use scenario contains office land use and adds different mixes of retail.and residential'to create the new scenario. v The anchor land use for the site is the office and off ce /warehouse use and is the primary peak hour trip generator, generating at least 75% of the trips for each alternative, therefore controlling the distribution. No changes to the AUAR are. needed. Comment 6: Transportation. Prior to preparation of the Final AUAR, Bloomington requests that Edina and Bloomington staff meet to discuss several details related to the traffic impact analysis, especially the forecast traffic conditions on East Bush Lake Road in Bloomington. For example, the Draft AUAR states that the 2030 level of service for the American Boulevard and East Bush Lake Road intersection will be LOS F + 100 in the AM peak and LOS A in the PM peak. A recent traffic study prepared for Bloomington by SRF (with higher Bloomington development assumptions) looked at the same intersection in 2030 and forecast a LOS B in the AM peak and a LOS B in the PM peak. Similar differences in forecast levels of service exist for the East Bush Lake Road intersections with the I -494 North Ramp, I -494 South Ramp and K.10 1686- 04UdminlDocslCommenr LettersUEMO- Comment Response - 091107.doc Responses to Comments September 26, 2007 Page 17 78`h Street. Given the large discrepancy between the Draft AUAR and a similar analysis done by SRF, Bloomington is concerned there may be a technical error in the Draft AUAR. If there is not a technical error, then Bloomington needs to better understand the impact of Scenario. 2 on East Bush Lake Road in Bloomington. In either case, it would be beneficial for traffic engineering staff from Bloomington and Edina to meet. Prior to the meeting, Bloomington requests a complete copy of the traffic study given that the turn movement figures do not depict th e East Bush Lake Road and American Boulevard intersection and do not depict 2030 turn movements. Response: It is noted that American Boulevard at East Bush Lake Road, and the 1 -494 ramps at East Bush Lake Road will not operate well in the future with the existing signal timing. The mitigation strategy as stated in section 21.1) Roadway Improvements Mitigation Plan, states "Intersection signal timing was first modified to provide optimal operations in each scenario." The above mentioned intersections operate at a LOS of C or better for all alternatives in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours. No changes to the AUAR are needed. Comment 7: Transportation. Table 21 -3 states that East Bush Lake Road from American Boulevard to W. 78`h Street is "Two -lane with tum.lanes." It should read "four -lane with turn lanes." Response: Table 21 -3 updated to reflect East Bush Lake Road is a four -lane divided roadway. The Final AUAR has been revised. Comment 8: Transportation. Table 21 -14 appears to conflict with Tables 21 -17 and 21 -18, with respect to ratings of congestions levels. For example, Table 21 -14 classifies East Bush Lake Road from American Boulevard to W. 78`h Street as "uncongested" in 2030, while Table 21 -17 states that in 2030 all four modeled intersection in this stretch of East Bush Lake Road will operate at LOS F during the AM peak period under Scenario 2. Response: Capacity assessment based on daily traffic volumes has been removed from the Final AUAR, including removing Table 21 -1, Table 21 -7, and modifications to Table 21 -14. The methodology used is a common planning level analysis for typical development. This methodology has shown to be less applicable to France Avenue due to the traffic flow patters near a high volume interchange (I -494). Capacity assessment will be limited to peak hour traffic modeling. The Final AUAR has been revised. Comment 9: Cumulative Impacts. On Page 108 and in Figure 29 -1, the Draft AUAR depicts "Current Adjacent Redevelopment Proposals." The text states that only Bloomington developments that are "approved and certain" are included. In regards to Figure 29 -1 and Table 29 -1, please note: • Bloomington approved final development plans in April 2007 for a 285,000 square foot office building at 8200 Norman Center Drive. The project is commonly referred to as the "8200. Tower." The developer is United Properties. • The shading for Area #2 south of American Boulevard should be removed. The Duke Realty project is north of American Boulevard. • Bloomington has received an application (not yet approved) from the Richdale Group to develop 418 apartment units at 5100 W. 82nd Street. An EAW for the project will be released soon. • There are several other Bloomington projects within the area depicted in Figure 29 -1 that have received Bloomington zoning approval over the past 10 to 20 years but that may not be characterized as "certain' given the time elapsed since approval. K ., 10/ 686 -04UdminlDocslComment LettersNEMO- Comment Response - 091 /07.doc Responses to Comments September 26, 2007 Page 18 Response: The "8200 Tower" project has been shown on Figure 29 -1 and listed in Table 29 -1. The correction to Area #2 has been on Figure 29 -1. Regarding the future Bloomington EAW for the apartment buildings, Bloomington's EAW should take into account the background traffic and future expansion in the Edina areas as part of that analysis. Since the apartments are not approved, they have not been included in the AUAR. The analysis in the AUAR represents reasonable assumptions as to cumulative impacts based on currently available information. No other changes have been made to the AUAR. - Comment 10: Notification. The City of Bloomington requests to be notified upon the receipt of applications for development projects within the Gateway AUAR area. Response: Edina will continue to keep Bloomington informed of applications received in the study area. Edina would also like to be notified on any applications that Bloomington receives for development along the borders in Bloomington. Comments from Rick Beaver Comment 1: This email is in response to the Gateway AUAR. My name is Rick Beaver and I work at the Seagate site at 4801 West 50th Street. I've been assigned the duty follow this issue and see how, if any, impacts it will have on Seagate. Can you please copy me on any minutes from the July 24 public review meeting. Response: Information from the public meeting was emailed under separate cover soon after receiving this email. Comments from Nels Nelson Comment 1: My interest in the Gateway project is mainly personal and based on walking through the area numerous times on my way to work. I do not comment as a representative of Barr Engineering Co. I would like to make two observations on the AUAR: • The figures do not appear to be posted on your website. Without the figures, the AUAR as posted is difficult to follow. • The AUAR does not discuss the history of the site. The response to Question 25 seems to overlook the question of whether the Pentagon Park office development had any significance in the history or development of the City of Edina. Perhaps, in addition to the State Historical Society the preparers ought to have consulted with the'. Edina Historical Society. My personal observation is that the buildings have an unusual appearance and internal layout and are not at all like the current crop of office buildings. According to the April 27, 2007, Business Journal, Pentagon Park was one of the first corporate campuses in Minnesota and was among the first developments by the Rauenhorst Corp., predecessor to Opus Corp. The people who originally planned, built and worked in it are probably passing away. Therefore I suggest that since the structures are both intact and significant, their demolition will be an environmental impact that should at least be considered in the AUAR and subsequent issuance of permits for demolition. As a mitigation suggestion, would it be possible, at a minimum, to provide documentation of the structures and possibly the oral history of the project so that 100 years from now this part of our history will at least be knowable, if not intact. K.101686- 0414dminlDocslComment LetterslMEMO- Comment Response - 091107.doc Responses to Comments September 26, 2007 Page 19 Response: The figures were subsequently posted on'the City's website after receiving this comment. Additional information from the City.'s.preservation planning consultant has. been obtained. This information has been added to the Final AUAR along with a mitigation measure that documentation of the Pentagon Towers and Quads site will be needed before they are razed. Comments from Bette Anderson Comment 1: I have received notice of the upcoming; meeting on July 24 regarding the AUAR Report to review the results`,of the environmental review process for the Gateway Area. My backyard..property.at 4936 Poppy Lane is adjacent to and directly behind „the entry ramp onto Hwy. 100 North from 77'h Street. The homeowners whose property borders the entry ramp onto Hwy. 100 from 77`h Street have already pled -their case in the past regarding the noise and_ exhaust pollution due to our, proximity to the highway. Especially during peak traffic times, conversations cannot be heard while sitting on the deck of my home due to the noise, nor can the stench of exhaust fumes be tolerated while outside in the backyard. ''We petitioned for a noise barrier of some sort but were told they would only build one 8 feet tall and that we would have to pay for it. This blatant disregard for the health and well -being of Edina's citizens was considered to be an abomination at that time. Should the Gateway development be allowed to go forward, I fear, that the noise and pollution will only become more unbearable and will severely depreciate the value of our existing properties. The increase in traffic over the years has only lessened the appeal for potential buyers of our properties, and any additional adverse effects will only serve to further diminish the value. Should there be changes slated to the intersection at 100 and 77''' in an effort to widen and expand it, I would demand that concrete noise barriers be erected along -the entrance ramp onto 100 N from 77`h Street, similar to the noise barrier at Hwy 100 N and W. 70`h Street. The irony is that there aren't even homes directly behind that noise barrier which has been there for many years now, but those living with the on -ramp literally in their backyards haven't been able to realize an effective wall against the traffic noise and exhaust pollution. Response: The City will take this alternative into consideration if any reconstruction of the TH 100 / W 701h Street interchange is proposed. No changes to the AUAR are needed. Comment 2: There is also the question of their obtaining easements to access some of our backyard property to expand the on -ramp to 100 N from 77`h Street. I as well as my neighbors would appreciate being informed.of any potential of this occurring.. Response: If any additional right -of -.way or easements are needed, the City will work with the property owners and inform th6 'in advance of any possible land needs. No changes to the AUAR are needed. Comment 3: In addition, currently the storm sewer drainage hole located between my property and that of my neighbor's to the south of me routinely overflows when we have heavy rains such that a large amount of debris of all sorts is left on our yards when the water subsides. This would only worsen if this development goes forward and something would have to be done to remedy the situation. X:101686- 04L4dminlDocslComment LettersMEMO- Comment Response - 091107.doc Responses to Comments September 26, 2007 Page 20 Response: The storm sewer system in question is not directly connected to the storm sewer system in the Gateway AUAR study area. Runoff from the redevelopment within the study area is conveyed away from Poppy Lane, so it will not directly impact this property. No changes to the AUAR are needed. Comments. from Neil Peterson Comment 1: I am,Neil Peterson, and I am part of the ownership of a building at 4455 W 77th. I did testify of the hearing and am submitting a follow up E mail because of the storm last night (Monday 8/13) that supports my concern and frustration. I am convinced that the development you are.proposing will exacerbate the 1) flooding and 2) ground sinking that we and several neighbors are suffering. 1) Flooding: Last evening our back lot was completely under water, draining across 77th and areas north. As the limited capacity in the swamp filled we became the storage area. I observed that our neighbor, especially the Hotel directly to the south share the same flooding and sinking problem. We are apparently the properties negatively impacted the most. 2) Sinking: The parking and lawn perimeter area of our building has sunk over 2 feet in the last few years. This year has been the worst. We once again have had to raise the driveways to even access the building, which may not be possible the next time because of the incline. Our tenant is becoming increasingly irritated, as are we, especially as we see the development activity on the Bloomington side, and now this site, which will drain toward us too. I understand that the water issue is that of the Water Shed District. I also know, the City of Bloomington and/or the District is permitting a. surcharging of the vacant properties north of the pond area along the freeway. That "dewatering" I believe, contributes to our problem to the point that I am seeking professional engineering advice. Your plans to develop north of our site.and utilize this same swamp as part of the drainage, is really going to float us away. Response: The storm pond in question is identified as SP-1 or the "Border Basin." The City of Edina will be working with the City of Bloomington to petition Nine Mile Creek Watershed District to improve this pond. As plans for these improvements are developed, it is anticipated that the impacts on potential subsidence on surrounding properties will be investigated. Additionally, as individual properties develop; property owners will be required to develop a storm water management plan that will result in no increase in runoff rates. No changes to the AUAR are needed. This concludes the responses to comments to the draft AUAR. The Final AUAR has been revised as summarized in this memo. If you have questions, please call me at (763)287 -7196. K :101686- 04IAdminlDocslComment LettersWEMO- Comment Response - 091107.doc To: Mayor & City Council From: Cary Teague Planning Director Date: November 5, 2007 Subject: Lot division for an existing double dwelling unit at 5216 and 5218 Malibu Drive for Gerald Arneson. Deadline for a city decision: January 16, 2008 KLYUMIKLUUMMEN UA 11UN Agenda Item II.0 - Consent Information Only F] Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion Resolution Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommended Action: Adopt the resolution approving the lot division on pages Al -A4. Introduction The applicant is proposing to split the existing lot into two lots to create a lot line separating the two dwelling units at 5216 and 5218 Malibu Drive.- Primary Issue • Is the proposed lot division reasonable? Yes. Staff believes the request is reasonable for four reasons: 1. The units are separated by a fire -wall. 2. Each unit has separate utility hook -ups. 3. Several similar lot splits already been done on this block. (See pages A5 -A6.) 0 4. There would be no change to the existing duplex. Planning Commission Recommendation The planning commission unanimously recommended that the city council approve the lot division as requested. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses North: Double - dwellings; zoned and guided for double - dwellings. South: Double - dwellings; zoned and guided for double - dwellings. East: Double - dwellings; zoned and guided for double - dwellings. West: Apartments; zoned R -3, and guided for high density. Existing Site Features The site is 17,854 square feet in size and contains a duplex. (See page A6 -A8.) Planning Guide Plan designation: Low - density attached residential Zoning: R -2, Double - dwelling unit residential PC 10/31/07 LD-7-6, 8, 9, 10 STAFF PRESENTATION,: Lot Divisions for Gerald Arneson at 5216 Malibu Drive 5305 Malibu Drive 5309 Malibu Drive 5317 Malibu D 7021 McCauley.ji"rail Mr. Teague informed the Commission thO,\alfl*p'qnfl , roposing to split each of his properties into two lots to create a lot 11 ne e soprat!" e two dwelling units at the party-wall. , j�a Mr. Teague explained each of the " U ," its IS, set ' ted by a fl" -wall and each of the units has separa te iL Mr. Teague concluded staff recd 6 'he lot divisions as 99M ppr6ytl 4h i f v N requested. COMMISSION COMMENL4;.,,.�,--,,i Commissioner Grable 'i - so gl�-Cga sted that staff consider requiring some type of "association fdquireMenr i4-jbi6 owner applies to "split" their double dwelling drik - Commiss- Ibner Gra'bieF1;.es:aI&, hi wants to ensure that the property is equally mai6talned'414., bgin�nb roof and' e. or building materials, etc. Mr. fd a6� Teagt;e--s cove 9 private n,16 , could be at possibility, adding he will look into this and.pri , nd his findings badkWfbre the Commission. for 5216, 5305, Commissioner carried. Brown Aoved to recommend lot division approvals dibu Drive and 7021 McCauley Trail. nded the motion. All voted aye; motion i RESOLUTION NO. 2007-113 APPROVING A LOT DIVISION FOR 5216 And 5218 MALIBU DRIVE City of Edina WHEREAS, the following described tract of land is requested to be divided: DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED Lot 3, Block 1 Parkwood Knolls 15th Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. WHEREAS, the owner of the described land desires to subdivide said tract in to the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "parcels ") described as follows: 5216 Malibu Drive See legal descriptions on attached Exhibit A 5218 Malibu Drive See legal descriptions on attached Exhibit B WHEREAS, the requested subdivision is authorized under Code Section 810 and it has been determined to comply with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina and do not interfere with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the Edina City Code Sections 810 and 850; NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, that the conveyance and ownership of the above described tracts of land as separate tracts of land are hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Code Sections 850 and 810 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but only to the extent permitted under Code Sections 810 and 850 subject to the limitations set out in Code Section 850 and said Ordinances are now waived for any other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and further subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent Ordinances of the City of Edina. Adopted this _ day of /2007. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 A, I www.cityofedina.com James B. Hovland, Mayor 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 -826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2007- Page Two STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2007, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_. City Clerk 4 Exhibit A ...� -. a77-. .It PROPOSED NORTH LOT That part of Lot 3, Block 1, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 15TH ADDITION, Hennepin County. Minnesota, lying northerly of the following described line: Commencing at- the southwest corner of said Lot 3; thence North 00 degrees 18 minutes 28 secon' ds East, assumed bearing; along the west line of said LqA .3 a distance of 62.08 feet to the point of beginning of the fine to be described; . thence South 89 degrees 45 minutes QO seconds East'a . distance of 150.00' feet to the east line of said Lot 3 and there terminating. �- W Exhibit B PROPOSED SOUTH LOT That part of Lot 3. Block -1. PARKWOOD KNOLLS 15TH ADDITION; I Hennepin County. Minnesota. lying southerly of the following described line: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Lot 3; thence North. 00 degrees. 18 minutes 28 seconds East. assumed bearing, along the west � line of said Lot. 3- d. distance- of_ 62.08, feet-- to the - point. of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 89 .degrees 45 minutes 00 seconds East a distance of 150.00 feet -to the east line of said Lot. 3 .and. ', there terminating. LOGISMap Output Page City of Edina s7ao 5193 S70a uae W10 sal U12 3213 3241 sn4 3217 ufa �j /r ri u2o ust � 3222 sm 00 7m $ S ` 37 i i 3701 5707 ,.. 5702 3706 Sm MY 3700 y. 24 33W . SJQa SJ09 s $ $710 5314 U13 3713 : 3712 s1i3 3714 Ufa ® s7fa 3710 3117 Gm PID: 3011721330005 x 5216 Malibu Dr Edina, MN 55436 �l A1 — earn 6630 I Page 1 of 2 u Skeet Rill City WnHf ^J creeks DLake nave DLakes O Perks Parcels http: / /gis.logis.org/LOGIS ArcIMS/ ims? ServiceName= ed_LOGISMap_OV &ClientVersi... 10/22/2007 LOGISMap Output Page City of Edina Page 1 o£2 A4 http:// gis. logis. org/ LOGIS_ ArcIMS /ims ?ServiceName= ed_LOGISMap_OV &ClientVersi... 10/22/2007 LOGISMap Output Page of Edina 5195 R -2 N .q e g Y Lisp► � :.. ... ... ... ... ... . ........ ,.,., ....•. •.. ov !ii•Oii �f�O. PID: 3011721330021 5309 Malibu Dr Edina, MN 55436 At iIl 4 �t3 \• f�fYrAPntV.1tr� \ Liiu� Page 1 of 2 LA Hm, 9 Nur 9b an Narr ./ city Limits Creeks Lake Namt ED Lakes Parks Zmtlno .IAa+one VDD +itlons ■ tlDDi,tloa ® ■DD- eltloe: ■ PCD- 1,Pem. ® PCD -2ipbm ® PCD- 2110te. ® PCDr,Ptm. PID,Pbeaea O PCID -t,Pb. O PQ&2 P1m. ■ PRD -„Ptm. ® PRD•21Ptm. ® PRD -e,P&= ® PRD -S,Pon. ■ PSRa,Pdm I�1 11- 142mvl D� L ®I R41Deuee[ ® RYD1R•aew Parcels http:// gis. logis. org/ LOGIS_ ArcIMS /ims ?ServiceName= ed_LOGISMap_OV &ClientVersi... 10/25/2007 r1 A "rte 1 r\ I-! K %J%j 1 I 1 1 I 1 ' 1% t t / L/ .% / N8950'19 "E ' . Ls #9235 - - -, 150.00 Wide- 10 MI Brick Wall 1 I .- !► 10' Building setback % �1 Gross. I aI 1 T� M Area P10 No. 30- 117 -21- 33-1.0005 steps �o� ?' I I 40.8 -� N F E =10 .8 ;� I exam Columns.) � 1 .. I v °� . � �• . � 8x8 � v iK� 1`Y �i �_ �. �i O I 5216 Malibu Or 1 ,cA• ��• 3 Existing. Building b :�. ' • t story wood frame du , Overhang :2, 8 ``� * d+•'' Grss I . '• Walkout a 3 Y ` area j %°� e o .. GFE =101.1 a i 10�• ': • 8 ��.. .. O i d 150 dl .00 � 1 • x9 Lot Unnee + sw Wide 1�1. Brick Wall tr i N ( y .4k GFE =101.2 1 9� a•• 3 ARM ,moo +d 5218 Malibu Or C4 Grass �I v 8wx8w Colurrks p m ( Area FF_ =10 8 ��5 { �Z— DD —44.7 - -_ I $ Block 1 I g steps ��Pq. is : 91 --- ��p Grass A L 10' Bupdi setback • � Area IBrick Wall i o 10 X50. oo . ` - -LS #9235 589.50'19 "W is �sz35 - - -f A r- -i- 1 1 A r\ r -1- 1/♦ A 1 I �hr�A To: Mayor & City Council From: Cary Teague Planning Director Date: November 5, 2007 Subject: Lot division for an existing double dwelling unit at 5305 and 5307 Malibu Drive for Gerald Arneson. Deadline for a city decision: January 16, 2008 REPORWRECOMMENDATION Agenda Item II.0 a Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion Resolution Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommended Action: Adopt the resolution approving the lot division on pages Al -A4. Introduction The applicant is proposing to split the existing lot into two lots to create a lot line separating the two dwelling units at 5305 and 5307 Malibu Drive. Primary Issue •. Is the proposed lot division reasonable? Yes. Staff believes the request is reasonable for four reasons: 1. The units are separated by a fire -wall. 2. Each unit has separate utility hook -ups. 3. Several similar lot splits already been done on this block. (See pages A5 -A6.) 4. There would be no change to the existing duplex. Planning Commission Recommendation The planning commission unanimously recommended that the city council approve the lot division as requested. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses The surrounding land uses are all double dwellings. Existing Site Features The site is 17,984 square feet in size and contains an existing duplex. (See page A7.) Planning Guide Plan designation: Low - density attached residential Zoning: R -2, Double - dwelling unit residential 2 PC 10131/07 LD -7-6, 8, 9, 10 Lot Divisions for Gerald Arneson at 5216 Malibu Drive 5305 Malibu Drive 5309 Malibu Drive IN, 5317 Malibu DrIpe 4 7021 McCaulev trail') STAFF PRESENTATION: Mr. Teague informed the Commission thoapp/-cant is proposing to split each of his properties into two lots to create a lot IirYe separatindtre two dwelling i fire -wall and lot divisions as iiring some type 'their double at the property is s, etc. Mr. will look into this ion approvals Trail. motion cv91N�1r'U a� e r RESOLUTION NO. 2007-114 APPROVING A LOT DIVISION FOR 5305 And 5307 MALIBU DRIVE City of Edina WHEREAS, the following described tract of land is requested to be divided: DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED Lot 4, Block 3 Parkwood Knolls 15th Addition WHEREAS, the owner of the described land desires to subdivide said tract in to the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "parcels ") described as follows: 5305 Malibu Drive See legal descriptions on attached Exhibit A 5307 Malibu Drive See legal descriptions on attached Exhibit B WHEREAS, the requested subdivision is authorized under Code Section 810 and it has been determined to comply with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina and do not interfere with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the Edina City Code Sections 810 and 850; NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, that the conveyance and ownership of the above described tracts of land as separate tracts of land are hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Code Sections 850 and 810 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but only to the extent permitted under Code Sections 810 and 850 subject to the limitations set out in Code Section 850 and said Ordinances are now waived for any other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and further subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent Ordinances of the City of Edina. Adopted this _ day of , 2007. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Cit)SAIAVE OF MINNESOTA 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com James B. Hovland, Mayor 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2007- Page Two STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2007, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 20_. City Clerk p Exhibit A PROPOSED - NORTH LOT C9 305, That part of Lot 4, Block 3. PARKWOOD KNOLLS 15TH ADDITION. according to the recorded plat thereof. Hennepin County. Minnesota, lying north of a line .described as follows; Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 4; thence South 00 degrees 18 minutes 28 seconds East, assumed bearing along the west line of sold Lot 4 a distance of 59.22 feet. to the point of beginning; thence South 89 degrees 31 minutes 19 seconds -East a distance of 149.99 ' feet to the east line of said Lot 4 and there terminating. Subject to Easements and Restrictions of record. A3 Exhibit B PROPOSED SOUTH LOT fS30l) That part of Lot 4. Block 3; PARKWOOD KNOLLS 15TH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof. Hennepin County. Minnesota. lying south of a line described .as follows; Commencing at the northwest corner of said Lot 4; thence South 00 - degrees 18 minutes 28-seconds East, assumed bearing along' the west line of said Lot 4 a distance of 59.22 feet to the point of beginning; thence South 89 degrees 31 minutes 19 seconds East, a distance of 149.99 feet to the east line of said Lot 4 and there terminating. Subject to Easements and Restrictions of record. 14 LOGISMap Output Page ra�v 1 U City of Edina L. ' .r. lNytNighN� azoo saes �. -.�l House ra,r Stroet rlarr t�ri .1 City Limits ^/ Crooks Lake Namr e r ; -1 Lakes F7] Parks 0 Parcels 1 2 't 2006 Aeri■ Pills Wig »` ' .....,. , a' a 5700 5301 , • `;. "�„' ^., -^a 530 7 5303 'ire. ' + 5302 sl i . Ism 5301 v 3306; ;. sJ11 » , .a..,__..... _ `sago 33 {. ec� A11i 1J ' 5711 +� r Slid � dJN i 5J1J v11 .\ ecyuar rzc x 5 J20- 1, c;_mss: A. W�1l U PID:3011721330020 le p,` y •J�� >1 r ° n , 5305 Malibu Dr ,;. ?, Q Edina, MN 55436 • »'t� l alt R)1� �S � fi • / http:// gis. logis. org/ LOGIS_ ArcIMS /ims ?ServiceName= ed_LOGISMap_OV &ClientVersi... 10/16/2007 LOGISMap Output Page City of Edina S100 3193 x sm 3709 5219 3211 521: 3717 smi 5214 5217 5H5 u}9 5215 5779 5211';�.� sm 3222 3170 sew 3790 $ t sm sme 3»6 /57021% 5504, � 5166 :24, s210 _ -'•I s79s 3m 5711 3710 ®0.0 sm 3319 6650 6664 3713 5212 3715 5714 5215 "a 3719 3716 5717 6m ham.' 6645 718 sm W20 � � .6803 6601 6666 ssso � su: i .uq N 6677 SS50 SSS1 350 Sf00 Sf01 sm 6e44 roaestls --- - -. KI tG614fi6>u� PID:3011721330020 o e cn 5305 Malibu Dr Edina, MN 55436 k6 rage i oz L L& 11eus� Mr strMt wa .I aey umro. Dlak• rm D lake D Parks D Pucsls http:// gis. logis. org /LOGIS_ArcIMS /ims ?ServiceName =ed LOGISMap_QV &ClientVersi... 10/16/2007 1 I �< v r\ A r\ I / 1 A / /\ /♦ r\ 1. 1% I- e K ► r► l 1 1 1 1 1 1 /89.50'36 "E 1 , -, 1 , 1 ♦ . r ,/ ./ L- 150.00 93.7 97.3 . 97.8 lO I �gg•0 f0 � i I 1 - - St 1 • Building setback i i P PID No. 30- 117 -21 -33 -0020 a 1 ^y011 • I ��rrAlO" 7.9 080 97.9 99.9 I I O _ - -- - -_ 98 -_- -07.7 • 9p7.S 7.9 I I v FF =S 102 8 968 to ,I • 4 �I a 12' y t0 a 5305 Malibu Or 0% r .. 1$ 1 ! GFE -97.4 Existing Building ' I. e 2 story wood frame duplex i f $ 1 ' m ... I 5 -- r CY w emu, ° s+s 149.99 ° .: Pro osed a • • . Lot Line -' l ' ,N R ` -' \ �� �Partp wall 1 f • ►_pn6acy wol �� -- GFE -97.4 e' I ' �v - - :• s A 5307 Malibu Or a•'! • o ° /-. 1 ' .2 Av ' • .4 •. Oa4 97.4 I FFE =103 3 1/ w 1/\ I K t \I 11 1 1 911, j ik&O fill I 197.7 I 'A .• A •4 ®983 97.3 i •/ 11 m Y x 7.8 S 984- Sae d; �� _ Block 3 I 1 - - - - - --1 - - -- 4 - - - -- o t o 10.00 foot Orainage Easement per plot. *, Building setback o 10 I S t PARKWOOD KNOLLS 15TH ADD177ON. -� i4.7 93.7 39.7 I 4. ' 91.8 26:00 9a4 ��� Found IP 11" 97.2 150.00 96.4 9a4 . 0.10 east and • b r- -1- 1 1 A r, r, A µ.7 set soul" S89 50 36 is t rL_� 111 1 I\: $01 W IOaat1011 1♦ / 1 1 1 / \ L/ L/ 1 4 I " I IENT FOUND [ENT SET AND MARKED E NO. 23988.. -WER MANHOLE V SURFACES BENCHM :TER y .. s"�� Top Nut Hydrant n. �1.., BITUMINOUS SURFACE 4. Block 3. PARKW AfMNTA11 To: Mayor & City Council From: Cary Teague Planning Director REPOK UKEC:UMMEN UATIUN Agenda Item ILC '-f> Consent Recommended Action: Adopt the resolution approving the lot division on pages Al -A4. Introduction The applicant is proposing to split the existing lot into two lots to create a lot line separating the two dwelling units at 5309 and 5311 Malibu Drive. Primary Issue • Is the proposed lot division reasonable? Yes. Staff believes the request is reasonable for four reasons: 1. The units are separated by a fire -wall. 2. Each unit has separate utility hook -ups. 3. Several similar lot splits already been done on this block. (See pages A5 -A6.) 4. There would be no change to the existing duplex. Information Only ❑ Date: November 5, 2007 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Lot division for an existing double dwelling unit at 5309 Action ® Motion and 5311 Malibu Drive for Gerald Arneson. ❑ Resolution Deadline for a city decision: January 16, 2008 ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommended Action: Adopt the resolution approving the lot division on pages Al -A4. Introduction The applicant is proposing to split the existing lot into two lots to create a lot line separating the two dwelling units at 5309 and 5311 Malibu Drive. Primary Issue • Is the proposed lot division reasonable? Yes. Staff believes the request is reasonable for four reasons: 1. The units are separated by a fire -wall. 2. Each unit has separate utility hook -ups. 3. Several similar lot splits already been done on this block. (See pages A5 -A6.) 4. There would be no change to the existing duplex. Planning Commission Recommendation The planning commission unanimously recommended that the city council approve the lot division as requested. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses The surrounding land uses are all double dwellings Existing Site Features The site is 17,599 square feet in size and contains a duplex. (See page A6 -A8.)' Planning Guide Plan designation: Low - density attached residential Zoning: R -2, Double - dwelling unit residential PC 10/31/07 LD -74, 8, 9, 10 Lot Divisions for Gerald Arneson at 5216 Malibu Drive 5305 Malibu Drive -. 5309 Malibu Drive 5317 Malibu Dry e 7021 McCauley all - STAFF PRESENTATION: Mr. Teague informed the Commission th ap� tcaefi proposing to split each of his properties into two lots to create a lot lire sepaEa tin ' a two dwelling units at the party -wall. J�� � y Mr. Teague explained each of the u its issepa"_ ed by a fi -wall and each of the units has separate utilities: 4 Mr. Teague concluded staff requested. COMMISSION COMMENTS,.:, r- Commissioner Grabiet'suai of "association r-dor a�n ent" if a! dwelling unit Zbmt'nlss b er Gr equally rtaigtained -ie. sam roe Teague id private covenai , and b' his findings back befoi T COMMIS ION ACTION: for 5216, 5305, 530953; Commissioner Scpterer carried., 4 jr r • 6.e.J lot divisions as It ted that staff consider requiring some. type ope _ owner applies to "split" their double iet -' �h wants to ensure that the property is anC(5ext: or building materials, etc. Mr. old bey possibility, adding he will look into this the Commission. loved to recommend lot division approvals ibu Drive and 7021 McCauley Trail. ded the motion. All voted aye; motion RESOLUTION NO. 2007-115 APPROVING A LOT DIVISION FOR 5309 And 5311 MALIBU DRIVE City of Edina WHEREAS, the following described tract of land is requested to be divided: DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED Lot 5, Block 3 Parkwood Knolls 15th Addition WHEREAS, the owner of the described land desires to subdivide said tract in to the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "parcels') described as follows: 5309 Malibu Drive See legal descriptions on attached Exhibit A 53011 Malibu Drive See legal descriptions on attached Exhibit B WHEREAS, the requested subdivision is authorized under Code Section 810 and it has been determined to comply with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina and do not interfere with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the Edina City Code Sections 810 and 850; NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, that the conveyance and ownership of the above described tracts of land as separate tracts of land are hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Code Sections 850 and 810 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but only to the extent permitted under Code Sections 810 and 850 subject to the limitations set out in Code Section 850 and said Ordinances are now waived for any other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and further subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent Ordinances of the City of Edina. Adopted this _ day of 2007. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor A( City %JE OF MINNESOTA ) 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 -826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2007-115 Page Two COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2007, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_. City Clerk 6 2 Exhibit A Proposed Properly Description PROPOSED NORTH LOT That part of Lot 5, Block 3. PARKWOOD KNOLLS .15TH ADDITION. Hennepin County. Minnesota. lying -northerly of the following described- line: Commencing at the southwest comer of said Lot 5; thence North 00 degrees 18 minutes 28. seconds East, assumed bearing, along the west line of said Lot 5, a distance of 60.16 feet to the point of beginning of the line to be described;. thence North 89 degrees 49 minutes 10 seconds East a distance of 150.00 feet to the east line of said Lot 5 and there terminating. Subject to Easements and Restrictions of record. A3 Exhibit B PROPOSED SOUTH LOT That part of Lot 5, Block 3, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 15TH *ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying southerly of the following described line: Commencing at the southwest. corner of said Lot 5; thence North 00 degrees .18 minutes 28 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the west line of said Lot 5; a distance of 60.16 feet to 'the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence North 89 degrees 49 minutes 10 seconds East a'. distance of 150.00 feet to the east line of said Lot 5 and there terminating. Subject to Easements and Restrictions of record. LOGISMap Output Page City of Edina s216 Sol all 5319 5241 ,.4 417 5116 5316 53153 5320 St11 �. 5129 3901 � 3702 '1.706. 5704 5906 SJ07 5700 N ( lJOd / 'i 5109 l 611 f 3710 5141 1 ' i WIS 3917 W13 5114 51,53 6646 5316 5316 5317 6600 . `��'`••. 53,6 3322 \ 773.�pJ8(718. \ / SM \ 5921 3720 t. - 6605 660, 6646 3550 N 5727 1 350 N 550 3651 sm sm QBH 664! 6677 3549 SIOf Q6N 5346 5546 3847 Sl04 340! 66J7 !� `d PID: 3011721330021 r y a• 5309 Malibu Dr Edina, MN 55436 rV lei.` �_ •,� ��,: Page 1 of 2 u Hmm raw titraat Ilan ./ qty Llmita ED Lak• I m 0 Lakaa a Polka Pamela http://gis.logis.org/LOGIS—ArcIMS/ims?ServiceName=ed—LOGISMap OV&ClientVersi... 10/22/2007 3170 5166 6652 6650 6634 QBH 664! 6677 3549 SIOf Q6N 5346 5546 3847 Sl04 340! 66J7 !� `d PID: 3011721330021 r y a• 5309 Malibu Dr Edina, MN 55436 rV lei.` �_ •,� ��,: Page 1 of 2 u Hmm raw titraat Ilan ./ qty Llmita ED Lak• I m 0 Lakaa a Polka Pamela http://gis.logis.org/LOGIS—ArcIMS/ims?ServiceName=ed—LOGISMap OV&ClientVersi... 10/22/2007 LOGISMap Output Page Page 1 of 2 City of Edina http:// gis. logis. org/ LOGIS_ ArcIMS /ims ?ServiceName= ed_LOGISMap_O V &ClientVersi... 10/22/2007 0aV/ MaIIDU Ur • ' I 9f W. I 87.7 L x 87.8 8.5 98.4 7695.8 t I ( r w r*%t Ali ♦i ♦r. I i• - I Fe K tltl 11 1 1 1 1 it N89'5036 "E au RE- 94-m -C � j �,s 26.00 1•� 150. oo R.& =94.31_E f 38.5 A 40.7 R i 91.6 Famd P MW o 1 i 10.00 foot Droinoge Easement per plat cost of Se , o 'a8 p" 1 PARKWOOD KNOLLS 157'74 ADD/710N.'♦ IP Io0otk11+• I 1W BuAdin� setback ,o' i ro 1 AC 197' _ 47_ . . .1 97.6 m p - __ - -- �- B7- 97.2 4. 1 \ m w0 I 1' wide I Brick WWI i a 4 • �.. I L toa 5309 Maiibu Dr \ a1 •Oa N' it 92.1 0 t0 =1021 i , • p, 10 to 0 9641 .•�_� 7 61sting Butldin 1' 97.1 x97.2 �, p . story wood 'frame 9dup1 t 4 Walkout W1 ° GFE- 97.5 �- 7' Fence • t t Ii ♦ t I i • � 0� Id, I K 1 ♦1 1 1 I 1 �N •4 150.00 •40.s X97.3 , 97.2. t • I v . L _ L _ . / ` •, 7 N89'49'10"E 97-2 T ;,. t I I o 1 I Proposed_ r 0 v" Porty `f Dar X 5 Lot Line l 0 3 GFE =97.4 (ri I ' g73 gB,g -4' Choinlin Fence- s. : 1 Chtrnnoy x9T.3 97.1. � � , s�4• t .7 i tp 920 o r =102.1 a + tp a, I 98.910 a3.`� N I 5311 Malibu Dr 12.5 2nd I S« I wa I ��, _ $� Brick 1 16 �-$ 9&6 47.7 0 4, j „^,� I , AC 97.8 97.1 �1 `�10 If0°"d 11ef 1- 10 BuitdS setback I s 1.0 oust of Sst I mad I �% IIP 1000t1on I I j 93 S 1 I 92.1 39.2 40.6 I Block 3 _ -15. 0 -_ 150.00 -LS #9235 S89 5036 "W A r- -I- 1 1 A r - 1 I I- -1 /_% 1 1 of 1 1 1 U% L To: Mayor & City Council From: Cary Teague Planning Director REPUKT /KLC:UMMEN UATIUN Agenda Item II.0 - Consent Recommended Action: Adopt the resolution approving the lot division on pages Al -A4. Introduction The applicant is proposing to split the existing lot into two lots to create a lot line separating the two dwelling units at 5317 Malibu Drive and 6804 Telemark Trail. (See pages A5 -A7.) Primary Issue • Is the proposed lot division reasonable? Yes. Staff believes the request is reasonable for four reasons: 1. The units are separated by a fire -wall. 2. Each unit has separate utility hook -ups. 3. Several similar lot splits already been done on this block. (See page A5.) Information Only ❑ - Date: November 5, 2007 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Lot division for an existing double dwelling unit at 5317 Action ® Motion Malibu Drive and 6804 Telemark Trail for Gerald ❑ Resolution Arneson. F1Ordinance Deadline for a city decision: January 16, 2008 ❑ Discussion Recommended Action: Adopt the resolution approving the lot division on pages Al -A4. Introduction The applicant is proposing to split the existing lot into two lots to create a lot line separating the two dwelling units at 5317 Malibu Drive and 6804 Telemark Trail. (See pages A5 -A7.) Primary Issue • Is the proposed lot division reasonable? Yes. Staff believes the request is reasonable for four reasons: 1. The units are separated by a fire -wall. 2. Each unit has separate utility hook -ups. 3. Several similar lot splits already been done on this block. (See page A5.) 4. There would be no change to the existing duplex. Planning Commission Recommendation The planning commission unanimously recommended that the city council approve the lot division as requested. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses The surrounding land uses include double dwellings to the north and west, and single - family homes to the south and east. (See page A6.) Existing Site Features The site is 17,342 square feet in size and contains a duplex. (See page A7.) Planning Guide Plan designation: Low - density attached residential Zoning: R -2, Double - dwelling unit residential 2 PC 10/31/07 LD -7-6, 8, 9, 10 Lot Divisions for Gerald Arneson at 5216 Malibu Drive 5305 Malibu Drive 5309 Malibu Drive ,P r 5317 Malibu Dfi. a 8 7021 McCauCeX.. all STAFF PRESENTATION: S� e Mr. Teague informed the Commission the"aP,�llaan oposing to split each of his properties into two lots to create a lot litiTe i6oiratin a two dwelling units at the party -wall. , Mr. Teague explained each of then .its is sapsd by a fi -wall and each of the units has separate utilities, << Mr. Teague concluded staff re' gmends;approva o he lot divisions as requested.` COMMISSION COMMENTS►.' m' Commissioner Grabiei sugg 4ted that staff consider requiring some type of "association Mquirernent" if Si.propeitty.owner applies to "split" their double dwelling unit. Commmissbner Grabiel saith wants to ensure that the property is equally ma!'0tameor i A. sam roof and: ®xte or building materials, etc. Mr. Teagui fd private covenan could be- possibility; adding he will look into this and.bFj his findings back befoe the Commission. COMMIS ION ACTION: r,. --°°fi�p�..7 Commisstbeer Browralribu oved to recommend lot division approvals for 5216, 5305,.53091-5317, Drive and 7021 McCauley Trail. Commissioner Schereir seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2007-116 APPROVING A LOT DIVISION FOR 5317 MALIBU DRIVE AND 6804 TELEMARK TRAIL City of Edina WHEREAS, the following described tract of land is requested to be divided: DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED Lot 7, Block 3 Parkwood Knolls 15th Addition WHEREAS, the owner of the described land desires to subdivide said tract in to the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "parcels ") described as follows: 5317 Malibu Drive See legal description on attached Exhibit A 6804 Telemark Trail See legal description on attached Exhibit B WHEREAS, the requested subdivision is authorized under Code Section 810 and it has been determined to comply with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina and do not interfere with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the Edina City Code Sections 810 and 850; NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, that the conveyance and ownership of the above described tracts of land as separate tracts of land are hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Code Sections 850 and 810 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but only to the extent permitted under Code Sections 810 and 850 subject to the limitations set out in Code Section 850 and said Ordinances are now waived for any other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and further subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent Ordinances of the City of Edina. Adopted this _ day of 2007. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor CitMWE OF MINNESOTA ) { 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2007-116 Page Two COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2007, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 20_. City Clerk eta Exhibit A PROPOSED WEST LOT That part of Lot 7, Block 3, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 15TH ADDITION, according to the recorded plat thereof,. Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying. Westerly. and Northerly of a line described as follows; Commencing at the southwest corner of said Lot 7; thence North 89 degrees . 50 minutes 38 seconds East, assumed bearing along the south line of said Lot 7 a distance of 70.10 feet to the point of beginning; thence North 00 degrees 18 minutes 52 seconds East, a distance of 70.37 feet; thence South 89 degrees 47 minutes 42 seconds East, a distance-of 19.50 feet; thence North 00 degrees 12. minutes 18 seconds East, a distance of 49.65. feet to the North line of sald . Lot 7 and there terminating. Subject to Easements and Restrictions of record.. k3 Exhibit B PROPOSED EAST LOT That part of Lot 7, Block 3, PARKWOOD KNOLLS 15TH ADDITION, according to the recorded plot thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying Easterly and Southerly of a line described as follows; Commencing at the southwest. corner of said Lot 7; thence North 89 degrees 50 minutes '38 seconds East. assumed bearing along the south line of- said Lot 7 a distance of 70.10 feet to the point of beginning; thence North 00 degrees .18 minutes 52 seconds East, a distance of 70.37 feet; thence South 89 degrees 47 minutes 42 seconds East, a distance of 19.50 feet; thence North 00 degrees 12 minutes 18 seconds East, a distance of 49.65 feet to the North line of said Lot 7 and 'there terminating. Subject to Easements and Restrictions . of record. �I LOGISMap Output Page e Q efa PID:3011721330023 5317 Malibu Dr Edina, MN 55436 A�- o e` >1 'tilt „tPO����9 Page 1 of 2 Le fJ __'1 Hiyhli0htet House Ww Street Mart ./ City Limits A/ Creeks Lake Namt Lakes Parks Parcels 2006 Aerla http:// gis. logis. org/ LOGIS_ ArcIMS/ ims? ServiceName= ed_LOGISMap_OV &ClientVersi... 10/16/2007 City of Edina SRI �'. Si 19 3220 - x: �7 3702 - j _ t,± r +' v 2! � 6650 M 5711 ..l, # y �, ^' SJ16 �si�,��. rr .Sw I�♦ � in Y PID:3011721330023 5317 Malibu Dr Edina, MN 55436 A�- o e` >1 'tilt „tPO����9 Page 1 of 2 Le fJ __'1 Hiyhli0htet House Ww Street Mart ./ City Limits A/ Creeks Lake Namt Lakes Parks Parcels 2006 Aerla http:// gis. logis. org/ LOGIS_ ArcIMS/ ims? ServiceName= ed_LOGISMap_OV &ClientVersi... 10/16/2007 r I r\ A r1 1 eta 1 e% e,% r\ ^— 1-� /\ ►f K 1t%I 1 1 1 1 1 1 % v Found IP n» N89 30'36 T o ra.90 act a 150.00 97.9 ii Set IV location • Sze 102.6 10 I i 89.52 X027 q�-I- 60.481 ;G Building setback 91 ► 1 i♦ 1 1 1 r.IK 1 \11 II 1 1,.. 00.0 1 025 r Zrr 1 ♦ 1 \ ♦ L — L —' Lo_OO �1 I O. Z 1 I . 1 g o25 ♦♦ PID No. 30 -117 — 21 i33 -0023 I 1 S I �. ' g • A r- I CAN g 2 25 7 S89.4T42"E I • a ..' i �,; •s ^ DO A" 'v S ,"� 0.65 6804 Telemork Trail �,nl •• WC .' gs, .. Existing Building yo- .+,P � 2 story wood frame duplex 0.65• Walkout 0 v„ LL wi: =102.1 r ContDow 1os.s 00.0 101.9 1,02, 5 GM 100.1 1 I 1i ^ .. .•,0g 1020 X I ---L3aoo o' ''.: wdk •' f o2z 1 L Lf 05 , ♦- Buiding setback 1 1 7-tdoo foot utility-1Z 1 ♦ ml �\ I 11 11 \I 1 s r,, r♦ ► 1 Easement per pots[ ♦ 1 n Block 3 11 8 N to PARKWOOD KNOLLS f, o 1 - L L i t v IV 1 15714 ADD177 N. ;LL , O - 1 . ° L- - - - - -- .}fit 1 - -- < - - - - --� 1 — - - - -- O. j 1 I +e . r'• O 3026 a 70.10 1 79.90 1 27.5 102., 040. L 09.1 ,01.5 tOt.1 M 1016 6 \Found IP 9n 1.0 feet cos► of L� 5et Ieetlon ' 11R.2 1.7 k7 —710&6 L- rNl 1 i 100.5 A 1 1 k7 —710&6 L- rNl 1 i To: Mayor & City Council From: Cary Teague Planning Director Date: November 5, 2007 Subject: Lot division for an existing double dwelling unit at 7013 and 7015 McCauley Trail South for Richard Strom. Deadline for a city decision: January 16, 2008 REFORWREC(OMMEN VATION Agenda Item II.0 �S Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends F] To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion Resolution El Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommended Action: Adopt the resolution approving the lot division on pages Al -A4. Introduction The applicant is proposing to split the existing lot into two lots to create a lot line separating the two dwelling units at 7013 and 7015 McCauley Trail South. (See pages A5 -A8.) Primary Issue • Is the proposed lot division reasonable? Yes. Staff believes the request is reasonable for four reasons: 1. The units are separated by a fire -wall. 2. Each unit has separate utility hook -ups. 3. Several similar lot splits already been done on this block. (See page A5 -A.) 4. There would be no change to the existing duplex. Planning Commission Recommendation The planning commission unanimously recommended that the city council approve the lot division as requested. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses North: Double - dwellings; zoned and guided for double - dwellings. South: Double - dwellings; zoned and guided for double - dwellings. East: Single - family dwellings; zoned and guided for single - family homes West: Highway 169 Existing Site Features The site is 22,435 square feet in size and contains a duplex. (See page A6 -A8.) Planning Guide Plan designation: Low - density attached residential Zoning: R -2, Double - dwelling unit residential 2 PC 10/31/07 LD -07 -11 , Lot Divisions for Richard Strom at 7015 McCauley Trail STAFF PRESENTATION: r Mr. Teague informed the Commission; the applicant is.proposi g to split each of his properties into two lots to create a lot line s p': a� sting -the two dwelling units at the party -wall. Mr. Teague explained each of the units is'seAarated�3ya fire -wall and each of the units has separate utilities. \. Mr. Teague concluded staff recommends approval of the lot divisions as requested. COMMISSION COMMENTS: / Commissioner Grabiel su gested that staff considor requiring some type of "association requirement" if -a' pro erty owner applies to "split" their double dwelling unit. Commissioner,Ora6iel said he ',wants to ensure that the property is equally maintained, i.e. same roo"nd exterior building materials, etc. Mr. Teague said private covenants could\be a possibility, adding he will look into this and bring his -fi idings,back before the Commission. MMISSIOI+ACT10N::- mmissioner Brown n 5216,,,5305, 5309, 5317,'Mal nmissioner Scherer secon pied: .d to recommend lot division approvals Drive and 7021 McCauley Trail. the motion. All voted aye; motion RESOLUTION NO. 2007-117 APPROVING A LOT DIVISION FOR 7013 And 7015 MCCAULEY TRAIL SOUTH City of Edina WHEREAS, the following described tract of land is requested to be divided: DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Lot 4, Block 1, Sioux Trail Fourth Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota WHEREAS, the owner of the described land desires to subdivide said tract in to the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "parcels') described as follows: 7013 McCauley Trail S. See legal descriptions on attached Exhibit A 7015 McCauley Trail S. See legal descriptions on attached Exhibit B WHEREAS, the requested subdivision is authorized under Code Section 810 and it has been determined to comply with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina and do not interfere with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the Edina City Code Sections 810 and 850; NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, that the conveyance and ownership of the above described tracts of land as separate tracts of land are hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Code Sections 850 and 810 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but only to the extent permitted under Code Sections 810 and 850 subject to the limitations set out in Code Section 850 and said Ordinances are now waived for any other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and further subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent Ordinances of the City of Edina. Adopted this _ day of . 2007. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor CittME OF MINNESOTA ) ' FAX 9552-927-8861 2-826-0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2007-117 Page Two COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of , 2007, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_. City Clerk 4 �?- Exhibit A ,f 7013 (NORTH) PROPOSED DESCRIPTION THAT PART OF LOT 4, BLOCK 1, SIOUX TRAIL 4TH ADDITION, L YI N G LINE DRAWN FROM A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SA / D LOT DISTANT SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF, TO A POINT ON THE EAST LOT DISTANT 60.23 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF. (11580 SF 10.26 AC ) 43 NORTH OF A 55. 1 FEET LINE OF SA I D Exhibit B ,#7015 (SOUTH) PROPOSED DESCRIPTION THA T PART OF L 0 T 4, BL OCK 1, S IOUX TRA I L 4 TH ADD 1 T ION, L Y1 NG SOUTH OF A L I NE DRAWN FROM A POINT ON THE WEST L I NE OF SA ID LOT DISTANT 55. 1 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF, TO A PO /NT ON THE EAST L I NE OF SA I D LOT DISTANT 60.23 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF. (11160 SF /0.25 AC) k` LOGISMap Output Page Page 1 of 2 A - http:// gis. logis. org/ LOGIS_ ArcIMS/ ims? ServiceName= ed_LOGISMap_OV &ClientVersi... 10/22/2007 City of Edina A. i, a .eC fi69 }0 Highli", i 9'... '� a 662- Y 6EJI �S ' HouN MK Street Nan . , City Umita ,6i} Lake Nam 7. °+ 6921 t 61 Parks Parcels bN4S •: 2006 Mria 4 title 023 � ,�. ky� 7001 PAVIEFAM 'u01 Ms w v 6625 �Y k (t OF ...lWS ` R� �,..j1Ut1 }. 7019 1025' - *r' '02e Vxi, .•rrya A.N9 Cwr C _CGryi GB 7115 4 PID:0711621220027 0� a . ° '• >1 ., 7015 Mccauley Tr S Edina, MN 554397 p l • {1CbH H711,�� t� • / 1ti11H J' A - http:// gis. logis. org/ LOGIS_ ArcIMS/ ims? ServiceName= ed_LOGISMap_OV &ClientVersi... 10/22/2007 LOGISMap Output Page Page 1 of 2 4� http:// gis. logis. org/ LOGIS_ ArcIMS/ ims? ServiceName= ed_LOGISMap_OV &ClientVersi... 10/22/2007 City of Edina L House Nu - Street Nan N" City Limits y Croaks - ..i it -; ❑ LAke Namf 7005 �I a ll '1, ❑ Parks R • t� ❑ Parcels 3t,�t "- • a �, >k 200E Aorta .w 1 .l f r _ t.•' ;art w. ' ' b y as ` ^, 7017 �. sr L' �v1•�, �` It .f� 11.a+rls/IAWt iC1:00t4aS1U5 � ��•• � } !-ax 91T4A, - . PID: 0711621220027 o le + w' ra4f 7015 Mccauley Tr S Edina, MN 55439 N (n r� Q t / ; • ��ti!�nt , t.��t.J 4� http:// gis. logis. org/ LOGIS_ ArcIMS/ ims? ServiceName= ed_LOGISMap_OV &ClientVersi... 10/22/2007 LOGISMap Output Page m 3 S s $ a a� a k R r. T + 6626 6632 7000 Im 7001 7012 24 70►6 7020 7024 7026 of Edina / 6910 6817 i 621 6606 �~ 6612 dw �f FAWEPA3? 700, 6671 6m 7003 7613 7009 \ �yy%ff, 7609 -- � 70N loos 7017 �r -- 7142 7021 ,` 71M 7143 7023 i PID: 0711621220027 7015 Mccauley Tr S Edina, MN 55439 A7 Page 1 of 2 U "Mao Mw stoat New N ply Uftb ^/ Crook, Lake Marm Parts Zardrp ® APO fAW.. rDD -4::: ■ rDo-6lra. ® MOD4lrid D — ■ PCO-r 1Pte- ® PCD -74PW ® PCOd{Pdu QPOIPdnadi El POD'11P1e. P0041P1wr . PAD.11PYne ® P21v� ® PRD-3«- ® PAD -jWs ® P'RD-sIPwo . P6w4IPrm a 4- 119n7r.D, ® aa1DV.0Yt ArDIA�,. Parcels http: / /gis.logis.org/LOGIS ArcIMS /ims ?ServiceNaTne =ed LOGISMap_OV &ClientVersi... 10/22/2007 EXISTING BUILDING #7011 NE COR LOT 4- , I C — 202.43 NW I � - NW COR LOT 4 S 86 °32' 03" W I ISAN MH 1 36.6 I I I I I I I y w gtt oµ�vE N I 11580 SF / 0.26 AC Q �O � W Z j � U 0 r C � O J (n? 0� b:3to �0 tj-Jz wM �zmn I gu- ad 40Zi rim W N _ - *�o Ln II Q \ O Q N O O - - - - - _ 4.0 Q I 36.6 I \ I EXISTING Ln I m °1 \ I 0 - - - WALK 13.4 I BUILDING d S 88009'05" W 197.65 I J #701.3 O_ EXISTING ,¢7013 (NORTH) PROPOSED DESCRIPTION O N 9.8 I CD PROPOSED LOT DIVISION LINE2 I 1 o 1.5 o I e \ 114.2 I ^� „� rn /1 52.7 0 0 1.5 p 32.8 N 87 °59' E 199.571 u n MI I I \ I ZT Q J rail r \ C o of N EXISTING I 1 I °� o 0 r C � O J (n? 0� b:3to �0 tj-Jz wM �zmn I gu- ad 40Zi rim W N _ - *�o Ln BUILDING THAT PART OF LOT 4, BLOCK 1, SIOUX TRA IL 4TH ADD I TION, LYING NORTH OF A /y7017 LME DRAWN FRAU A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT DISTANT 55. 1 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF, TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT D /STANT 60.23 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF. (11580 SF /0.26 AC ) 0 20 40 60 #7015 (S N (SOUTH) PROPOSED DESCRIPTIO THAT PART OF LOT 4, BLOCK 1, SIOUX TRAIL 4TH ADDITION, LYING SOUTH OF A L /NE DRAWN FROM A POINT ON THE WEST L /NE OF SAID LOT DISTANT 55. 1 FEET SOUTR OF SCALE IN FEET LOT D /STANT£60. 2J FFEEET Sou RrH OF THE NORTHEAST CI ORNER THEREOF. EAST LINE OF SAID (11160 SF / 0.25 AC ) A. 4 o 04 f N < Z �P� BUILDING - I� \ I 1 C\ ° --- - - - - - - a.o #7015 ui IZ - \\ I ( a r' Lo it m IU V 11160 SF /\0.25 AC i I, N \ Q \ O Q pRNE \ I I O O U Q I 36.6 I \ I O v Q m °1 \ I 0 13.4 I J d S 88009'05" W 197.65 I J O_ EXISTING ,¢7013 (NORTH) PROPOSED DESCRIPTION O BUILDING THAT PART OF LOT 4, BLOCK 1, SIOUX TRA IL 4TH ADD I TION, LYING NORTH OF A /y7017 LME DRAWN FRAU A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT DISTANT 55. 1 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF, TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT D /STANT 60.23 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF. (11580 SF /0.26 AC ) 0 20 40 60 #7015 (S N (SOUTH) PROPOSED DESCRIPTIO THAT PART OF LOT 4, BLOCK 1, SIOUX TRAIL 4TH ADDITION, LYING SOUTH OF A L /NE DRAWN FROM A POINT ON THE WEST L /NE OF SAID LOT DISTANT 55. 1 FEET SOUTR OF SCALE IN FEET LOT D /STANT£60. 2J FFEEET Sou RrH OF THE NORTHEAST CI ORNER THEREOF. EAST LINE OF SAID (11160 SF / 0.25 AC ) A. 4 o 04 f N < To: Mayor & City Council From: Cary Teague Planning Director REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item II.0 'Le Consent Recommended Action: Adopt the resolution approving the lot division on pages Al -A4. Introduction The applicant is proposing to split the existing lot into two lots to create a lot line separating the two dwelling units at 7021 and 7023 McCauley Trail South. (See pages A5 -A8.) Primary Issue • Is the proposed lot division reasonable? Yes. Staff believes the request is reasonable for four reasons: 1. The units are separated by a fire -wall. 2. Each unit has separate utility hook -ups. 3. Several similar lot splits already been done on this block. (See page A5 -A6.) Information Only Date: November 5, 2007 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Lot division for an existing double dwelling unit at 7021 Action ® Motion and 7023 McCauley Trail South for Gerald Arneson. ❑ Resolution Deadline for a city decision: January 16, 2008 ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommended Action: Adopt the resolution approving the lot division on pages Al -A4. Introduction The applicant is proposing to split the existing lot into two lots to create a lot line separating the two dwelling units at 7021 and 7023 McCauley Trail South. (See pages A5 -A8.) Primary Issue • Is the proposed lot division reasonable? Yes. Staff believes the request is reasonable for four reasons: 1. The units are separated by a fire -wall. 2. Each unit has separate utility hook -ups. 3. Several similar lot splits already been done on this block. (See page A5 -A6.) 4. There would be no change to the existing duplex. Planning Commission Recommendation The planning commission unanimously recommended that the city council approve the lot division as requested. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses North: Double - dwellings; zoned and guided for double - dwellings. South: Double - dwellings; zoned and guided for double - dwellings. East: Single - family dwellings; zoned and guided for single - family homes West: Highway 169 Existing Site Features The site is 22,270 square feet in size and contains a duplex. (See page A6 -A8.) Planning Guide Plan designation: Low - density attached residential Zoning: R -2, Double - dwelling unit residential Pj PC 10/31107 LD -7-6, 8, 9, 10 Lot Divisions for Gerald Arneson at 5216 Malibu Drive 5305 Malibu Drive 5309 Malibu Drive 5317 Malibu Dry e 7021 McCayle ` - ails;, 1 STAFF PRESENTATION: - Mr. Teague informed the Commission thn.ap li'cantt roposing to split each of his properties into two lots to create a lot IirTe sepatati a two dwelling units at the party -wall. Mr. Teague explained each of th®ur)its is lapsed by a fine -wall and each of the units has separate utilitie& ,.. ;.. Mr. Teague concluded staff re' cofmmends. approva o ' he lot divisions as requested. COMMISSION COMMENTB� Commissioner Grable' sugg ated that staff consider requiring some type of "association-, quirement" if a prop�hy owner applies to "split' their double dwelling unit. Commissioner GrabieLsaidh wants to ensure that the property is equally-',ma i9tained,. i.e. same,roof and :'ext ''or building materials, etc. Mr. Teague - d private covenant could bey possibility, adding he.will look into this ant :bri his findings back bdd6 the Commission. COMMIS lON ACTION: Commissioner Brown oved to recommend lot division approvals for 5216, 5305, 4309, 53. / alibu Drive and 7021 McCauley Trail. Commissioner Scherer ,seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2007-118 APPROVING A LOT DIVISION FOR 7021 And 7023 MCCAULEY TRAIL SOUTH City of Edina WHEREAS, the following described tract of land is requested to be divided: DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Lot 2, Block 1 Sioux Trail Fourth Addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota described in Document No. 3731640, office of County Recorder, lying easterly of the following described line: Commencing at the southwesterly corner of said Block 1; thence on an assumed bearing of North 80 degrees 57 minutes 10 seconds East along the southerly line of said Block 1 a distance of 20.60 feet to the beginning of the line to be described; thence North 10 degrees 42 minutes 18 seconds West a distance of 164.60 feet; thence northerly along a tangential curve to the right, having a radius of 675.00 feet, to the north line of said Lot 2 and there terminating. WHEREAS, the owner of the described land desires to subdivide said tract in to the following described new and separate parcels (herein called "parcels ") described as follows: 7021 McCauley Trail S. See legal descriptions on attached Exhibit A 7023 McCauley Trail S. See legal descriptions on attached Exhibit B WHEREAS, the requested subdivision is authorized under Code Section 810 and it has been determined to comply with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations of the City of Edina and do not interfere with the Subdivision and Zoning Regulations as contained in the Edina City Code Sections 810 and 850; NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, that the conveyance and ownership of the above described tracts of land as separate tracts of land are hereby approved and the requirements and provisions of Code Sections 850 and 810 are hereby waived to allow said division and conveyance thereof as separate tracts of land but only to the extent permitted under Code Sections 810 and 850 subject to the limitations set out in Code Section 850 and said Ordinances are now waived for any other purpose or as to any other provisions thereof, and further subject, however, to the provision that no further subdivision be made of said Parcels unless made in compliance with the pertinent Ordinances of the City of Edina. Adopted this 5th day of November, 2007 ATTEST, City Hall Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 -826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2007- Page Two STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of 2007, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 20. City Clerk 0 Exhibit A PROPOSED NORTH LOT That part of Lot 2, Block 1, SIOUX TRAIL FOURTH ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota, Ding easterly of the following described "Line A ": .Commencing at the southwesterly corner of said Block 1; thence on an assumed bearing of North 80 degrees 57 minutes 10 seconds East along the southerly line of said Block 1 a distance of 20.60 feet to the beginning of the line to be described, thence North 10 degrees 42 minutes 18 seconds West a distance of 164.60 feet; thence northerly along .a tangential curve to the right, having a radius of 675.00 feet, to the north line of said Lot 2 and there terminating. and lying northerly of the following described line: Commencing at the southeasterly corner of said Lot 2; thence North 00 degrees 16 minutes 44 seconds West along the easterly line of said Lot 2, a distance of 57.70 feet tot the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 89 degrees 49 minutes 20 seconds West a distance of 186.24 to intersect the herein described "Line A" and there terminating. Subject to Easements and Restrictions of record. 10 Exhibit B PROPOSED SOUTH LOT That part of Lot 2, Block 1, SIOUX - TRAIL FOURTH ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying easterly of the following described '°Line A ": Commencing at the southwesterly corner of said Block 1; thence 'on an assumed bearing of North 80. degrees 57 minutes 10 seconds East along the southerly line of said Block 1 a distance of-20.60 feet to the beginning of the line to be described; thence North 10 degrees 42 minutes 18 seconds West a distance ' of 164.60 feet; thence northerly along a tangential curve to the right, having a radius . of 675.00 feet, to the north line of said Lot 2 and there terminating. and lying southerly of the following described line: Commencing at the southeasterly corner of said Lot 2; thence North 00 degrees 16 minutes 44 seconds West along the easterly line of said Lot Z a distance of 57.70 feet tot the point of beginning of the line to be described; thence South 89 degrees.49 minutes 20 seconds West a distance. of 186.24 to intersect the herein described . "Line A" and there terminating. Subject to Easements and Restrictions of record. 0 LOGISMap Output Page Page 1 of 2 4 T http: / /gis.logis.org/LOGIS ArcIMS /ims ?ServiceName =ed LOGISMap_OV &ClientVersi... 10/22/2007 City of Edina 6915 69fa LA ® MW'Wft 6816 6617 Mwaa 6i~ NSA Sef7 N ati umlb 6841 ^/ Make a 6110 6811 ❑ Lake Mama 6600 Puke 6921 6612 � Parcel. 8858 am 6945 7001 7000 16UREPMS! law /oa 70D1 6e11 6625 7005 70M 7006 lao9 M3 1009 7012 N < 7012 7008 7015 t 3 7016 8 7017 7005 7017 1020 a w 7025 70y} 7026 7027 yx'ay%*01m 110aea0rA�hd19 KI LOWGBLm 7r�1 tflar g° r '`Q PID: 0711621220036 7021 Mccauley Tr S � p •' 4. Edina, MN SS439 4 T http: / /gis.logis.org/LOGIS ArcIMS /ims ?ServiceName =ed LOGISMap_OV &ClientVersi... 10/22/2007 LOGISMap Output Page Page 1 of 2 14 http:// gis. logis. org/ LOGIS_ ArcIMS/ ims? ServiceName= ed_LOGISMap_OV &ClientVersi... 10/22/2007 City of Edina - 691,1 • 9 Fm ►6910 L Highlight. F 1 d 6617• House Nur 0818 a- :x 6: p ' �'i� � Street Nan OILY Limits • : .. s 094" J� ,. ,. ,� x .ar oily 6eJ� Creaks Lake Harm `6011 'r _ Parks l_J 'r Parcols +_ 2006 Mrta FAN lk NUT iy $ { WU �'x1 PANTEPA= 5� aft Z :,i '• 7001 y 't'662f A 6625 IA � s � e 7w •�r?tl s 'ti _ ,'07, so ell 1012 i � JOt .fir vt lot 1142 " • �'k.+ �. nos M 4.a •: -.ma rnNW3 Cmp (C!_O[iSCCasf A. I MA PID: 0711621220036 41 ^ , 7`, �:L,r o e vt, rn 7021 Mccauley Tr S �>1 p , ' °16 Edina, MN 55439 \L� r „3 1 •ta pox 14 http:// gis. logis. org/ LOGIS_ ArcIMS/ ims? ServiceName= ed_LOGISMap_OV &ClientVersi... 10/22/2007 •LOGISMap Output Page City of Edina 9a �'i.0.. TT�•0.0. !ice -. �:/ PID:0711621220036 7021 Mccauley Tr S Edina, MN SS439 0810 BOtt 68t7 \ 701J l 7m 7005 7147 71p 7118 I`� 7111 it .qll. 1 Page 1 of 2 Le ttDDaa mm ADaat tart da ueua ❑ tai. Narm Parka Zoning ®ApotA.M. © rDDJ(rhim ® rDDa(rr.. ❑ r°"• p■ PCD•, (Pdr /CDd{R� ® PCOJ(Pb- ❑ PO(Pl..O+ 0 POD -,(PWM Palm (Pbm ® PkDd(PY. ® PaD4(POm ® PaDd(Ph� ® arD(ayb. ❑ Parcel. �7 http:// gis. logis. org /LOGIS_ArcIMS /ims ?ServiceName =ed LOGISMap_OV &ClientVersi... 10/22/2007 ............... ,••••.•,.tom_..•••. ...... ..... ...... ..... ... ...•.• .... .x... ...... ...... ................ ...... ...... ...... , ............... ...... ...... ....... ..... ....... ....... ....... ...... O�O.00�•�•O�•0�00.0000� •. •. • • ❖. • . • o.. •. •. •. ❖. ❖. . ❖.•.•.•. ❖.•.o ❖.•.•. ❖••a ................ ................. ................. ................. ....... ....... ...... ..•.... . ,......•........ ................ ,................ ....... en • •..... :............... .•••o.••❖ ............... .. .•.•.•. ❖.•. ❖.•.• ...... ...... .... ...... .... ....... .....•.. .......... ❖❖. . ❖. ❖.•. ❖. ❖. -1,� ❖.• •-VO• i••. ••• •••.•6 ••••..� •60•.01? 1�••' 4v ��,�0� �fa•,9��•< 6 1�►i 90i �•1 I .�44l�O�i9i1.O.10• 9•••O•v.�i. r OOI 000i�4 91 00.16. O 9 1�0`•�.6�.1 i 100•0w•i��a•i 06:100.�•1y' :0:9 '•000.0.000 �� ♦. .0 � �•.•.!� • � •0.0.0.0•. ••••. :0.0 9a �'i.0.. TT�•0.0. !ice -. �:/ PID:0711621220036 7021 Mccauley Tr S Edina, MN SS439 0810 BOtt 68t7 \ 701J l 7m 7005 7147 71p 7118 I`� 7111 it .qll. 1 Page 1 of 2 Le ttDDaa mm ADaat tart da ueua ❑ tai. Narm Parka Zoning ®ApotA.M. © rDDJ(rhim ® rDDa(rr.. ❑ r°"• p■ PCD•, (Pdr /CDd{R� ® PCOJ(Pb- ❑ PO(Pl..O+ 0 POD -,(PWM Palm (Pbm ® PkDd(PY. ® PaD4(POm ® PaDd(Ph� ® arD(ayb. ❑ Parcel. �7 http:// gis. logis. org /LOGIS_ArcIMS /ims ?ServiceName =ed LOGISMap_OV &ClientVersi... 10/22/2007 �. 11 .11 1 x < 4' Chain(ink Fence- -, N89:55270 87.9 . North Tine -. 1 193.01 ti8 9�s of Lot 2 0.!, ,�. .3 -- -x x x x x x a7•a 77.3 r x 92.1.. X5.0 1 853 �I al 0 • 89.3 95.2 �6 98.2 Dx9j . 2 87.1 4 6 10' Building setback • a Existing briVewayalao °' ° GFE =96.59 I P1D No. 07- 116 -21 -22 -0036 4. • / \ y 8.8 93.6 Grass Grasso r. -j.Q• a1 =97.35 1. A Area O r- e 1 Area 021 McCauley Trail l� 97•0 ' 91.7 i . Existing Building ' . 92'8 9z8 Block 1 �7 �.O 9s.6 t� 2 story duplex U1 ° •t 8FE =93.0 2• N of 1 d a1 • i -8' Stockade Fenced' I O o x 98.5 186.24 ° 67.2 x �c 1 S89'49'20"W 1 sat P x83 T �O Party wall ro•' t L i ed ,� a Lot Line g 1 • O 1 SFE =93.02 iii e°� m 1 0 ` { x 6'a le a �f 14 fl Ac . Edge of Trees M Point of beginning of -.1 IN 92,9 92.s \ Line Description Zt 6.2 �..P 6 a x 1 7023 McCauley Troil 1 ` �•P ' °' FFE =97.12 / 1- 1 1 1 1 A 96.2 3 o�j1 / 1 \ \ i I % i t 1 Grass C " . V/ 9a.o � xes. n " Area 1\ Ar wit :Existing 0..rWmrhy • ° ' Landscaping--\ Qs 2.6. o GFE =96.56 ai 92.40 of ,- • a . 0£ y ° 6'a 4 1 t .4 0' Building setback x 9. 89.8 ' 89.2 88.0 98 axv.. 98.4 as 1 Grass n i x 44 0E 1 # 95.9 d Area °- 90.8 Ts ` 89.6 80,3 080.5 'rr •i x 98.3 x 96.0 88.1 176.18 89.5 • 78.3 �• • • ,. Q EO ;• .� N89 2721 "'W 89.2 A k 88.0 / c Point of commencement "Line A" of Line Description - .� -:' 96.2 1 TO: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: November 5, 2007 AGENDA ITEM IV. A. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Contract No. PW 07 -5 Rehabilitation of Well No. 3, 5233 Halifax Avenue Improvement No. WM -470 Company 1. Bergerson - Caswell, Inc. 2. Keys Well Drilling Company 3. E.H. Renner & Sons, Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Bergerson - Caswell, Inc. Amount of Quote or Bid $ 58,245.00 $ 88,780.00 $ 95,731.00 $ 58,245.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This purchase is for the general overhaul and renovation of Well No. 3, located at 5233 Halifax Avenue. This project includes redeveloping of -the cavity at the bottom of the well. This project is part of our annual Capital Improvement Program work to maintain our wells in proper working condition. The building for this well is also scheduled for replacement and was also part of the Capital Improvement Program. Staff is working with the neighbors on finalizing a design for the building and then the building will be bid out this winter and presented to the Council for approval. The Capital Improvement Program allocated $500,000 for the well and building. The Engineers estimate for the well is $99,500. The Water Utility Fund will fund this improvement. Staff recommends awarding this bid to Bergerson - Caswell, Inc. } The Recommended Bid is within budget not within Public Works - Utilities n Rughes, City Wallin, Vrtance Director GAEngineering \Contract Numbers\2007\PW 07 -5 Well No. 3, 5233 HalifaAADMIN\MISC\20071030 PW 07 -5 RFP.doc � 91N�11r1,� e o REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: FROM: VIA: SUBJECT: DATE: Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation Gordon Hughes, City Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 November 5, 2007 AGENDA ITEM: IV. B. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Concrete Deck Renovation — Braemar Golf Course Company Amount of Ouote or Bid 1. Crown Masonry 1. $15,650.00 2. Minnesota Concrete Structures, LLC . 2. $18,500.00 3. Hage Concrete 3. $22,900.00 4. Curt Kriens Construction 4. $26,300.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Crown Masonry $15,650.00 Account #: 5400.1740 GENERAL INFORMATION: This purchase is for renovation of the concrete deck on the west side of the Braemar Golf Course Warren C. Hyde Clubhouse. This section of Braemar Golf Course's concrete deck is over 30 years water to leak onto the golf cars stored below. The deteriorated concrete has also resulted in numerous trip hazards. Specifications call for removal and replacement of approximately 1,500 square feet of concrete, which will include installation of a new waterproof membrane and protection board, textured non -slip surface, rebar and 4,000 PSI concrete mix with fibers added. This renovation will eliminate the trip hazards and create a water -proof roof for the golf car storage area. If approved by Council, this project will be completed this Fall. This project is funded through the Braemar Golf Course's Capital Improvement Plan under Miscellaneous Equipment & Repairs, which is budgeted at $35,000.00 for 2007. John Kdvifios, Director This Recommended bid is within budget Edina Park and Recreation Department 1 not within bucWet A ohn Walrin, F e Director Gordon Hug�hel, CiV, Manager To: Mayor & City Council From: Gordon Hughes City Manager Date: 10/31/07 Subject: Resolution Authorizing City of Edina to Join ICLEI Recommendation: Adopt attached Resolution Info/Background: REYUK' ATION Agenda Item V. A. Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends To HRA ® To Council Action F-1 Motion ® Resolution Ordinance Discussion Last month, the Council and the Energy and Environment Commission conducted a work session concerning the Commission's proposed work program. Among the items discussed was the Commissions recommendation that the City should join the International Council for Local Environmental Initiative ( ICLEI). The Council directed that this be placed on the November 5th agenda for action. The Commission prepared the attached analysis to support its recommendation. Also attached is a proposed resolution for Council consideration. Bill Siercks, Chair of the Commission, will be in attendance on November 5th to answer any questions RESOLUTION NO. 2007-119 CITY OF EDINA JOINING ICLEI CITIES FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION CAMPAIGN WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the City's best interests to take action to stop global warming; and WHEREAS, on February 6, 2007, the City Council approved Resolution No. 2007 -20 concerning the Cities for Climate Protection and the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement. The City Council approved signing the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement and also requested that the new Energy and Environment Commission review the requirements of the ICLEI Cities for Climate Projection program and present a recommendation to the Council on whether to join ICLEI; and WHEREAS, in joining 28 other Minnesota cities and over 700 U.S. cities in signing the U.S. Mayors Climate Protection Agreement, Edina has committed to take actions including the following: (1) Urging the federal government and state governments to enact policies and programs to meet or beat the target of reducing global warming pollution levels to 7 percent below 1990 levels by 2012; (2) Promoting land use and transportation policies that result in reduced greenhouse gas emissions; (3) Increasing the use of clean, renewable energy and making energy efficiency a priority; (4) Adopting purchasing and building construction and operation practices that reduce greenhouse gas emissions; (5) Increase recycling rates and urban forest cover; and (6) Support education efforts about how to take actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. WHEREAS, ICLEI's Cities for Climate Protection (CCP) Campaign assists cities to adopt policies and implement quantifiable measures to reduce local greenhouse gas emissions, improve air quality, and enhance urban livability and sustainability. The campaign is based around five milestones that local governments commit to undertake. The milestones allow local governments to understand how municipal decisions affect energy use and how these decisions can be used to mitigate global climate change while improving community quality of life. Edina would join more than 800 local governments participate in the CCP, integrating climate change mitigation into their decision - making processes WHEREAS, the Energy and Environment Commission passed a motion unanimously recommending that the City join ICLEI's Cities for Climate Protection Campaign at its meeting in September 2007. The Commission stated that ICLEI membership will enable the City to access the tools and technical assistance offered by ICLEI and learn from the experience of other member cities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Edina City Council that the City of Edina join ICLEI's Cities for Climate Protection Campaign as a full member and, through its Energy and Environment Commission, take a leadership role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the community and in promoting public awareness about the causes and impacts of climate change. ADOPTED this 5th day of November, 2007. X RESOLUTION NO. 2007-119 Page Two STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 5, 2007, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal-of said City this day of 20_. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk Pros and Cons for participating in the Cities for Climate Protection program. In March 2007, the Mayor endorsed the "US Mayor Climate Protection Agreement ". This document is a pledge by the mayor to "strive to meet or exceed Kyoto Protocol targets ". In addition, the City of Edina may also participate in the CCP program, explained below. This program provides an action map tier achieving specific milestones toward fulfilling the promises outlined in the agreement. What is IC LET? The International Council for Local Environmental Initiative was established in 1990 at the '`Word Congress of Local Government for a Sustainable Future' at the United Nations. It is organized as a 501 (c)(3) non profit organization. ICLEI works with US mayors participating in the Cities for Climate Protection (CCP) campaign to reduce carbon emissions: The relationship between iCLEI and US mayors. is illustrated below: US Conference of mayors Pros ICLEI US Mayor Council on Climate Protection (50 majors) t Mayors participating in the Majors that signed the US Cities for Mayor Climate Protection Clin-)ate Pralect; on t A(gr er°rie it campaign campaign • Publicity • Technical support • Set common goals with other cities (ex. Cut emission 30;io by 2020) • Networking with other MN cities (28 cities at the last count) • Action map far achieving goals • Milestone 1: Conduct a baseline inventory and emissions forecast • Milestone 2: Adopt an emissions reduction goal o Milestone 3: Develop a local action plan o Milestone 4: Implement emission reduction measures and policies o Milestone 5: Monitor and verify results Germana Paterlini 1 Energy Commission 1 1/1/2007 Help in completing green gas emission inventory Virtual technical training on green bas sofhvare ICLEI collaboration with other organizations; such as: • US Conference of Mayors • Clinton Climate Initiative City. of Seattle o Sundance Preserve o National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration o British Consulates - General o Earth Day Network o National Wildlife Federation "Minimal" membership fee, based on demographics Support from ICLEI new Offices (one in De Moines IA) Cons Note: some of these Cons are specifics to ICLEI, but others simply summarize the expected difficulties in implementing emission targets • Fee- for - Service: Commission will need to estimate eventual costs • Software tools may be difficult to use are require excessive training. Steep learning curve • ICLEI decentralized structure can lead to poor information sharing • Lack of urgency in meeting milestones may delay visible results to the Edina residents • Effort in obtaining emission data on the communities is too large. Things to be considered are data gathering efforts, costs, degree of cooperation in the community, businesses and the City of Edina • City of Edina Staff may not have in -house capabilities to monitor milestones and implement action plans Poor knowledge transfer between commissioners. Commission must ensure that the expertise gained by the commissioner on emission issues is transferred to new members. Training sessions may became a components of a commissioner's activities German Paterlini 2 Energy Commission 11/1/2007 CATEGORY — CITY COMMITMENTS MAYORS' AGREEMENT ICLEI Greenhouse Gas Emission Inventory & Forecast Yes Yes Set GHG Reduction Goals (City Council Resolution Pledging to Reduce GHG emissions Yes i Yes Develop Action Plan to Reduce GHG; Achieve Reduction Goals Yes Yes Look at Transportation options, alternative energy; energy efficiency; green purchasing; green buildings: water conservation; increase recycling, urban forests Yes Yes Improve City transportation fleet; cit • buildings Yes Yes Public education and outreach Yes Yes Monitor and verify progress in reducing emissions Implied Yes + Yes City designate staff member and elected official as liaison to ICLEI No Yes Annual Membership Cost No $600 CATEGORY — ASSISTANCE TO CITY f Toolkit explaining "5 milestone" process (5 milestones are already included above: i. Emissions inventory &forecast; ii. Reduction goals, iii. Action Plan, iv. Implementation; v. Monitor and Verif .results No Yes i f Software products and training assistance to quantify GHG emissions _ No Yes List Serves, Newsletters, Conferences, Workshops Website only Yes Online resources, case studies, fact sheets Limited Yes Training workshops No Yes(Limited) /, o e tit M AGENDA ITEM: V. B. Bike Edina Task Force- Full report has been submitted to Council prior to meeting No packet data Oral presentation 1-1 Information coming REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # V. C. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE Consent ❑ City Engineer Information Only ❑ Date: November 5, 2007 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA TO Council Subject: Morningside Neighborhood ® Action ❑ Motion Water Report ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ® Discussion Info /Background: Red water issues have been increasing within the Morningside Neighborhood of Edina in the last six - months. Long -term solutions include relining of the water main pipes, however short -term solutions are limited to flushing and waiting for the nitrification of the water within the pipes to stop processing, which is causing the red water. Attached you will find a report that details what is happening within the distribution system along with an analysis of the water within the northerly area of Morningside Neighborhood. City staff and staff from City of Minneapolis, Minnesota Department of Health, and Naeem Qureshi with Progressive Consulting Engineers will be making a presentation on the Morningside Neighborhood water system and the current water quality. G: \Engineering \Improvements \WM479 Momingside Water Main\FEASIBILITY\Final Report\20071105 Item V C Momingside Water Report.doc SUMMARY: Red water issues have been increasing within the Morningside Neighborhood of Edina in the last six - months. Long -term solutions include relining of the water main pipes, however short -term solutions are limited to flushing and waiting for the nitrification of the water within the pipes to stop processing, which is contributing to the red water and turbidity issues. This report covers the details of what is happening within the distribution system along with an analysis of the water within the northerly area of Morningside Neighborhood. LOCATION: The Morningside Neighborhood is surrounded by 40`h Street West to the north, Sunnyside Road to the south, Natchez Avenue / Oakdale Avenue to the west, and France Avenue to the east (See Figure 1). All water for the Morningside Neighborhood is supplied by the City of Minneapolis, which their water source is from the Mississippi River. Morningside Watermain w- E Figure 1 E,ghw s ^ecep November S, 2007 REPORT 479 @,- �, -WM o� MORNINGSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD WATER ISSUES �,�� ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT �0 •,ti�R���. CITY OF EDINA BBe NOVEMBER 5, 2007 SUMMARY: Red water issues have been increasing within the Morningside Neighborhood of Edina in the last six - months. Long -term solutions include relining of the water main pipes, however short -term solutions are limited to flushing and waiting for the nitrification of the water within the pipes to stop processing, which is contributing to the red water and turbidity issues. This report covers the details of what is happening within the distribution system along with an analysis of the water within the northerly area of Morningside Neighborhood. LOCATION: The Morningside Neighborhood is surrounded by 40`h Street West to the north, Sunnyside Road to the south, Natchez Avenue / Oakdale Avenue to the west, and France Avenue to the east (See Figure 1). All water for the Morningside Neighborhood is supplied by the City of Minneapolis, which their water source is from the Mississippi River. Morningside Watermain w- E Figure 1 E,ghw s ^ecep November S, 2007 Report Morningside Watermain No. WM -479 November 5, 2007 HISTORY: The Morningside Neighborhood obtains its water from the City of Minneapolis's water system. The point of entry is located at West 40th Street and France Avenue. The water is then distributed through a 16" watermain that runs along France Avenue to West 42nd Street where the watermain reduces to a 12" watermain. The 12" watermain is looped through the neighborhood along West 42nd Street to Grimes Avenue then along Grimes Avenue to Morningside Road and then to France Avenue and then back to West 42nd Street. Smaller water mains (6" and 8 ") branch from the 12" watermain to service the neighborhood. All of the water mains were installed between 1928 — 1969 with the exception of a few sections installed or replaced in 1977, see Figure 2. The original watermain pipes were unlined Cast Iron Pipe (CIP), while the newer pipe is lined Ductile Iron Pipe (DIP). The 1977 additions were completed to provide better looping of the system. Looping increases pressure in the pipes and helps reduce stagnate water in the lines. Stagnate water can potentially lead to settlement of iron type particles in the pipes, poor taste, and pressure issues. 11F Il�li 111111 C� IIIIIi;llll■ rt _ MCM � �? i -• hr =tom --�� �vjj�1� !��1111111111 • ��_ Arak Morningside Watermain - -- cast Iron Pipe (CIP) w Figure 2 Ductile Iron Pipe (DIP) s E St Louis Park Water N- m 5. 017 Page 2 of 9 Report Morningside Watermain No. WM -479 November 5, 2007 There is approximately 4.1 miles of unlined CIP and 1.3 miles of DIP in the Morningside Neighborhood. In comparison, the remaining portion of Edina's system has approximately 200 miles of watermain. The area served by the City of St. Louis Park has not had any red water issues to our knowledge; however these customers would possibly contact City of St. Louis Park with any issues. The City of Edina is not alone with dealing with red water issues. The City of Minneapolis, Columbia Heights, St. Paul, White Bear Township, Roseville, Brooklyn Park, New Hope, and Crystal are some other Metro cities that have had similar problems with their unlined CIP water mains. Several factors can cause red water: • Iron levels in the water. • Type and combinations of pipes such as unlined cast iron pipes typically constructed from 1920 to 1970. • Seasonal Wells — directional flow change within the pipe. • Water main breaks. • Dead -end water mains. • Drawing from hydrants such as turning watermain off and on for activities such as: street sweeping operations, sewer cleaning operations, skating rinks, seasonal flushing, and fires. • Nitrification caused by non - pathogenic bacteria • Private plumbing systems such as water softener malfunctions, no water softener, galvanized piping, and low water consumption. Through the years, red water has been prevalent in the City's water system. Iron, which causes red water, is a naturally occurring element and is found in all of the City's well water supplies. Since the majority of the system is from well water, the Public Works staff has approached all red water complaints the same way. Public Works will flush the watermain, in the surrounding areas; this process has worked well in solving most of the problems. Public Works has an aggressive flushing program throughout the City. This program consists of systematically flushing the entire system twice a year. If Public Works receives complaints other times of the year they will then flush those areas. The systematic flushing system works where gate valves within the system are used to purge the water to the outer extremities and then out of the system. To purge only the loose iron deposits within the water mains, staff analyzed the typical direction of flows that occur within the water mains. The City verified with our computer water system models that a continuous . flushing program within the Morningside Neighborhood is not adversely affecting the turbidity of the water; see Figure 3 for flow direction within the Neighborhood. In 2002 the City had the entire water system put into a computer model. The purpose of this computer model was used to analyze sizing of water mains, timing of tank refilling, additional well capacity, additional peak / emergency capacity, flow directions, looping of dead ends, and need for additional water treatment capacity. Page 3 of 9 Report Morningside Watermain No. WM -479 November 5, 2007 Toward the end of 2005 the City was contacted about discolored water in the Morningside Neighborhood. Public Works immediately started flushing the lines and has continually flushed the lines when complaints are lodged. There were intermittent red water complaints in 2006 and early 2007, but t Figure 3: Water flow direction within water mains. a within the last few months, Public Works has been receiving numerous complaints from residents in the northerly area of the neighborhood. Public Works is now flushing the entire neighborhood on a weekly basis. The northerly area of the neighborhood is monitored on a daily basis and is flushed more frequently than the weekly flushes if needed. Staff commissioned our water - modeling consultant to analyze the Morningside Neighborhood flows from and within this system to see if the Page 4 of 9 Report Morningside Watermain No. WM -479 November 5, 2007 system itself is working correctly. Staff, including the City Fire Marshal field - tested the flows for this area. We found that the flows in the northerly portion of the neighborhood were lower than they should be, see Hydrant Flows in Appendix. Flows in this area ranged from 500 to 700 gallons per minute; fire flows should be approximately 1000 gallons per minute. This reduction in flows indicates a reduction in the inside area of the pipe. Staff also analyzed the inside of the water main pipe at Lynn Avenue and West 401h Street in early October, see photos below. The section of pipe removed was replaced with a gate valve to help the efficiency of flushing in this area. As seen in the photos the inside area of the pipe was greatly reduced. This confirmed the results from the hydrant flow test. Staff then sent the section of pipe to a testing consultant to do an analysis of residue in the pipe and determine if the original walls of the pipe were deteriorating. i; a► 0_ Photo #1 & 2: Watermain pipe removed by 4000 Lynn Avenue The City of Minneapolis has also been working very diligently with City staff to analyze the red water issue. Minneapolis staff has determined a nitrification process is occurring within the Morningside water system. Nitrification is a process where ammonia that is added to the water for treatment is converted to nitrite and nitrate. A naturally occurring non - pathogenic bacteria that is Page 5 of 9 Report Morningside Watermain No. WM-479 November 5, 2007 typically found on the wall of the pipes helps to lower the pH of the water and then the water becomes corrosive to the old deposits in the un -lined pipes causing red water to occur, see attached email from Chris Catlin — City of Minneapolis regarding nitrification. A lower water temperature of water entering the Minneapolis water system could also help reduce the red water issues, since nitrification will stop once the water falls below 50 degrees Fahrenheit. Minneapolis's source of water is from the Mississippi River, which has seasonal variation in water temperatures. STANDARDS: The City of Edina's goal is to provide residents with high quality, safe, reliable drinking water that meets Federal and State requirements. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Minnesota Department of Health have identified many chemicals and other substances that might pose a risk to humans. When a contaminant is thought to pose a risk, these agencies set upper limits for safe human consumption. ,The City is required to prepare and deliver a Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) or drinking water report to all consumers every year. This report contains the City's annual water quality report, which includes information on the monitoring conducted in the City. The City of Minneapolis also releases a drinking water report to their customers, which includes customers within the Morningside Neighborhood. Based on the latest CCR, both cities have always maintained safe drinking water standards. Water standards are separated into two different standards — Primary and Secondary. Primary Standards are health related standards and test for items such as Coliform Bacteria; there is actually 86 different contaminants tested within the primary standards. Secondary Standards relate to aesthetics and taste such as iron and manganese. TESTING: Water samples have been taken within the Morningside Neighborhood. A summary of all samples taken to date is described below. Test results can be found in the appendix of this report. Water Sample tests taken by Tara Doyle Bizily (4005 Lynn Avenue) on 9/27/07 do not show Coliform Bacterial or chemical contaminants. The tests do show high turbidity and iron content, but the Minnesota Department of Health has indicated such levels are unlikely to pose a health risk (see attached test results). The City also collected water samples on 10/15/07 at three locations on Lynn Avenue (4000, 4005, & 4116). The City also had water tests performed at 4116.Grimes Avenue, 4002 Inglewood Avenue, and 4011 Kipling Avenue. These tests showed Total Coliform Bacteria present at 4005 Lynn Avenue, but do not show Coliform Bacterial or chemical contaminants at any of the other sites (see attached test results). On 10/17/07, the City collected two additional samples from 4005 Lynn Avenue at the kitchen and bathroom sink, and one from 4002 Lynn Avenue. at Page 6 of 9 Report Morningside Watermain No. WM -479 November 5, 2007 the bathroom sink. These tests did show Total Coliform Bacteria was present at the kitchen sink at 4005 Lynn Avenue (see attached test results). Upon receiving the results, Roger Glanzer informed Tara Doyle Bizily about the positive tests for Total Coliform Bacteria (see attached e- mail). The other two locations did not show Coliform Bacteria or other contaminates present. The tests from 10/15/07 did show low chlorine levels in the Morningside Neighborhood. This could be the result of nitrification. Nitrification is caused by non - pathogenic bacteria using ammonia and using up the chlorine. In response to the low chlorine levels, the City is taking daily chlorine readings in the Morningside Neighborhood. If tests show low chlorine levels, the City will add additional flushing to the area until chlorine levels return to normal. The pipe section taken from Lynn Avenue and tested on October 23, 2007, indicates that the deposits within the pipe contained 75% iron, 1 % aluminum, 1% calcium, and 21.2% water. The walls of the water main were also analyzed and the results were satisfactory. SHORT TERM SOLUTIONS: The City of Edina has limited options for the short term. The City continues to flush the system on a weekly basis (daily if needed) and will flush the system when other complaints are reported. Staff will also start to continually flush the northerly part of the system either through a private residence or by use of a fire hydrant. This will keep the water from becoming stationary, which will reduce the activity of the non- pathogenic bacteria. Dropping temperatures could help the red water issues. The current ten -day forecast is predicting temperatures lower than 50 degrees Fahrenheit. LONG TERM SOLUTIONS: Since the red water is within the distribution system and not from the water supply the potential long -term solution to the issue must take place within the pipe network. City staff is analyzing four different options to improve the water mains within the Morningside Area. This improvement could take place over three phases, with the first phase of the project to commence in early spring of 2008. The first phase would be in the northerly part of the neighborhood. The four options would be: A. Place a concrete liner in the unlined CIP. B. Place a plastic liner in the unlined CIP. C. Complete replacement of the watermain by pipe bursting. D. Complete replacement of the watermain by open cut method. Options A or B are very feasible for a 2008 construction start. Option C or D would move the construction start date out until 2009 due to the extensive planning and surveying that would be required for these options. Below is detail analysis for each of the options: Option A - Place a concrete liner in the unlined CIP: This process involves cleaning the pipe and relining with a concrete spray -on liner. This process is Page 7 of 9 Report Morningside Watermain No. WM-479 November 5, 2007 good for structurally sound water mains. This process will provide a clean pipe, but does not add any additional structural support to the pipe. This process involves minimal surface disturbance throughout the neighborhood. Minneapolis has used this program for many years. Columbia Heights has recently partnered with Minneapolis to line approximately 4000 lineal feet of their existing water main. The City of Edina is currently looking at developing a similar partnership with Minneapolis. The concrete lining is a specialty product and contractors that perform this work are not based out of the Midwest. Therefore, one benefit of lining with concrete is the potential partnering that could be accomplished with Minneapolis when their contractor is in the region to perform their project. Option B — Place a plastic liner in the unlined CIP: This process involves cleaning the pipe and relining with a process similar to the Cured In Place Pipe lining that we have used on sanitary sewers within Edina. This process will provide a clean pipe and also provide additional structural support to the pipe. This process involves minimal surface disturbance throughout the neighborhood. Relining water mains this way is new to Minnesota, but is approved and used in other areas of the United States. Option C — Complete replacement of pipe by pipe bursting: This process pulls another pipe of equal or larger size through the existing pipe. This requires extensive trenches and digging up every service to re -attach the service to the watermain. This process provides a clean and. new pipe. The increase surface disturbances also increases the planning time for a project of this scope. Option D — Complete replacement of pipe by open cut method: This process disturbs the roadway corridor to replace the entire watermain and reattach all of the services. This process will provide a clean and new pipe. The increase surface disturbances also increase the planning and surveying time for a project of this scope. City staff will be meeting in the near future with the Minnesota Department of Health to obtain their opinion of Option B. Staff has not completed a detail analysis of the options. Options A and B are less destructive options to the neighborhood as Option C & D requires an almost total reconstruction of the roadway and will require an entire construction season to complete for each phase. Staff has incorporated into the proposed 2008 -2012 Capital Improvement Program approximately 1.4 million dollars over the next three years for these lining projects. Funding for these re- linings will be from the Water Utility Fund. However, the Morningside Neighborhood has been charged a "pass - through" rate for their water; meaning that the City does not increase the cost of water billed from Minneapolis to pay for capital improvements to this system. Currently, there is a meter charge applied to each customer that covers about $18,000 per year for capital improvements to the system. The pipe linings within the Morningside Neighborhood will only remove the red water issues if the source continues to be from the City of Minneapolis. Staff has analyzed the potential of providing the Morningside Neighborhood Page 8 of 9 Report Morningside Watermain No. WM-479 . November 5, 2007 with water from the City of Edina well system. The upcoming Country Club Neighborhood utility and roadway project will include water main connection points at Grimes Avenue and Wooddale Avenue incase there is ever a need to provide Edina Water to the Morningside Neighborhood. APPENDIXES: The following items can be found in the Appendix of this report: • October, 2007 Hydrant Flows within the Morningside Neighborhood • 10/08/2007 Laboratory Report — Underwriters Laboratory: Tara Bizily, 4005 Lynn Avenue. • 10/17/2007 Tri -City / William Lloyd Analytical Laboratory — 4000 Lynn Avenue • 10/17/2007 Tri -City / William Lloyd Analytical Laboratory — 4005 Lynn Avenue • 10/17/2007 Tri -City / William Lloyd Analytical Laboratory — 4116 Lynn Avenue • 10/17/2007 Tri -City / William Lloyd Analytical Laboratory — 4002 Inglewood Avenue • 10/17/2007 Tri -City / William Lloyd Analytical Laboratory — 4011 Kipling Avenue • 10/17/2007 Tri -City / William Lloyd Analytical Laboratory — 4116 Grimes Avenue • 10/17/2007 Tri -City / William Lloyd Analytical Laboratory — 4005 Lynn Avenue (bathroom sink), 4005 Lynn Avenue (kitchen sink), 4002 Lynn Avenue (bathroom sink) • Chlorine Test Results — Lynn Avenue and Kipling Avenue 10/25/2007 American Engineering Testing, Inc. Water pipe test results • Correspondence with Morningside Residents and other agencies. Page 9 of 9 Hydrant Flows Morningside Neighborhood October, 2007 Hydrant Location Static Pressure (psi) Residual Pressure (psi) I Pitot Reading Flow (gpm) Fire Flow @ 20 psi (gpm) 40th / Grimes (SW Quad) 75 39 23 716 900 40th / Kipling (SW Quad) 72 53 17 615 1100 40th / Lynn (SW Quad) 72 33 9 448 500 41 st / between Monterey & Lynn (south) 87 40 16 597 700 41st/ Lynn (NW Quad) 87 19 10 472 500 4250 France 74 68 55 1106 3600 42nd / Alden (SW Quad) 85 80 60 1156 4600 42nd /Crocker 85 72 20 667 1600 42nd / France 87 83 60 1156 5300 42nd / Grimes (SW Quad) 85 80 60 1156 4600 42nd / Lynn (SW Quad) 87 66 30 817 1500 42nd / Oakdale 85 37 14 558 700 42nd / Scott (SW Quad) 90 85 60 1156 4800 Alden 4216 79 34 4 298 300 Alden 4230 75 26 5 334 400 Crocker 4224 85 58 38 920 1500 Crocker 4238 76 51 20 667 1000 Grimes 4024 85 55 5 334 500 Grimes 4224 73 67 49 1044 3400 Inglewood - Dead End 72 10 8 422 400 Inglewood in Front of School 87 45 4 298 400 Kipling 4026 87 40 17 615 700 Little / Lynn 82 48 14 558 800 Little / Oakdale 81 23 9 448 500 Lynn 4120 87 67 30 817 1600 Lynn 4234 79 36 9 448 500 Morningside / Alden 73 66 50 1055 3100 Morningside / France 76 71 54 1096 4000 Morningside / Scott 76 66 45 1001 2500 Scott 4218 84 80 14 558 2500 Scott 4230 73 60 35 883 1900 TM n ri Well Water Testing Kit www.uldrinkwell.com LABORATORY REPORT Client: Tara Bizily 4005 Lynn Avenue Edina, MN 55416 Sample Site: Kitchen Sink Collection Date: 09/27/2007 Laboratories Inc.o Report #: 151479 Received: 09/28/2007 Reported: 10/08/2007 At -A- Glance Testing Results (detailed results on following pages) Bacteriologicals re. Regulated Metals `' t�iee Inorganics Iced Volatiles Not Tested Herbicides Not Tested Pesticides Not Tested Industrial Chemicals Not Tested Radionuclides Not Tested Aesthetics Orange Legend Arta = no detections at or above the Reporting Limit Yellow = contaminants detected below Federal Limit Red = contaminants detected at or above Federal Limit Orange = aesthetics contaminants detected at or above Federal Secondary or recognized Limits Thank you for choosing DrinkWell. We appreciate the opportunity to provide you with this report. Your laboratory results were reviewed and approved by Lead ScientisteR . DrinkWell(TM) Water Testing www.uldrinkwell.com Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Client: Tara Bizily Report M 151479 Contaminants Detected with Related Health Effects & Aesthetics Conditions Below please find a summary of detections for the sample you submitted. The source of any health effect language used in this report is the Federal Register or other United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) documents. For more information on health effects in drinking water, please visit www.epa.gov /safewater. The risk of health problems from exposure to these contaminants depends on several factors. If you have health effect concerns related to your drinking water, you may wish to contact a medical professional such as, your county health department, your doctor or other health care professional. This does not imply UL's endorsement of any of these health care providers and UL assumes no responsibility or liability for any medical advice given to Customer by any party. Sources for aesthetic effect language is the EPA and Rutgers University, Interpreting Drinking Water Quality Analysis, 5th Edition. Shelton, Theodore B. Ph.D. Health Related Contaminants Nitrate Nitrate was detected at 1.1 mg /L which is less than the Federal MCL of 10 mg /L. iaTbidt '� 1 Turbidity was detected at 4.2 NTU which is greater than the Federal MCL of 0.3 NTU. Turbidity has no health effects. However, turbidity can interfere with disinfection and provide a medium for microbial growth. Turbidity may indicate the presence of disease - causing organisms. These organisms include bacteria, viruses, and parasites that can cause symptoms such as nausea, cramps, diarrhea and associated headaches. Aesthetic Related Contaminants Ctotal- AI kaa1_i n it)(_'1, Total Alkalinity was detected at 13 mg /L as CaCO3. There is no Federal Limit for this contaminant. dotal Hardness Total Hardness was detected at 81 mg /L as CaCO3. There is no Federal Limit for this contaminant. Iron Iron was detected at 1.8 mg /L which is greater than the Federal SMCL of 0.3 mg /L. Iron is regulated as a secondary contaminant. It is associated with rusty color, sediment, metallic taste and reddish or orange staining. MAnganese -Manganese was detected at 31 ug /L which is less than the Federal SMCL of 50 ug /L. DrinkWell(TM) Water Testing www.uldrinkwell.com Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Client: Tara Bizily Report #: 151479 Contaminants Detected with Related Health Effects & Aesthetics Conditions Aesthetic Related Contaminants (continued) Sodium Sodium was detected at 20 mg /L. There is no Federal Limit for this contaminant. Sodium levels in drinking water are usually low and unlikely to be a significant contribution to adverse health effects. The Institute of Medicine of the National Academies of Science recommends 1,500 mg is an adequate sodium intake for adults between the ages of 19 and 50. The recommendation is decreased to 1,300 mg /day for adults between 50 and 70 years and to 1,200 mg /day for adults over 70. In addition, it is recommended that total dietary intake be limited to no more than 2,300 mg /day. Sodium is not a regulated parameter in drinking water, however the U.E. EPA has recommended 20 mg /L as a guideline for those individuals on a very low sodium diet (500 mg /day) and 30 to 60 mg /L as levels where the taste of water may be affected. Iron - Related Bacteria Iron - Related Bacteria was detected at 5000 cfu /ml. There is no Federal Limit for this contaminant. wellcare® Hotline The wellcareO hotline is a free, friendly service that can help anyone with questions about wells or well water: private well owners, teachers, students, realtors, developers, building companies, engineers and health department staff. The hotline's helpful specialists will provide answers or referrals - within 24 hours. You can reach the wellcare@ hotline by calling 888 - 395 -1033. EPA For EPA information on drinking water treatment units and the contaminants they remove, please visit:www.epa.gov/seahome/groundwater/src/treata.htm. County Health Office Your local county health office may have information regarding private well water treatment including well disinfection for total coliform. Homeowners with a positive result for total coliform are encouraged to contact their county health office for further advice. Contact information may be found in the government section of your phone directory. Water Treatment Professional A water treatment professional in your area may have information regarding private well water treatment. Contact information for water treatment system companies may be found in the yellow pages of your phone directory. 4.1 DrinkWell(TM) Water Testing www.uldrinkwell.com Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Client: Tara Bizily Report #: 151479 Definitions mg /L 1 mg /L or milligram per liter represents 1 part per million (ppm). An example of a part per million is one cent in $10,000. ug /L 1 ug /L or microgram per liter represents 1 part per billion (ppb). An example of a part per billion is one cent in $10 million. Action Level The concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other actions which a public water system must take. Aesthetics Contaminant which may affect water quality such as taste, color or odor. Federal Limit Maximum allowable concentration of a contaminant in a public water supply. This applies to primary and secondary limits. Health Effect The source of any health effect language used in the DrinkWell reports is the Federal Register or other USEPA documents. For more information on health effects in drinking water, please visit www.epa.gov /safewater. Herbicide A chemical compound, usually synthetic, used to control weeds. Industrial Chemical Chemicals used or produced primarily in industrial applications. Inorganic Contaminants (IOC) Mineral -based compounds such as metals and nitrates. These contaminants are naturally occurring in some water, but can also enter water through farming, chemical manufacturing and other human activities. Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) The highest concentration of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are set as close to the Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) as feasible using the best available treatment technology and taking cost into consideration. Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) The concentration of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLGs are non - enforceable health goals. N/A Not Applicable. 4 DrinkWell(TM) Water Testing www.uldrinkwell.com Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Client: Tara Bizily Report #: 151479 Definitions (continued) ND None Detected. The contaminant was not detected above the lowest reportable value by the procedure used for analysis. NTU NTU stands for Nephelometric Turbidity Unit which is the unit used to measure turbidity in water. Turbidity refers to the scattering and absorption of light rather than transmission caused by suspended matter such as clay, dissolved organic material and microscopic organisms. Organic Contaminants Carbon -based chemicals, such as solvents and pesticides, which can enter drinking water supplies through runoff from cropland, discharges from industrial operations, underground tanks, spills and other sources. Pesticide A synthetic chemical, used to control pests such as insects and other invertebrates such as worms and nematodes. Primary Drinking Water Standards Legally enforceable standards established by the Federal government that apply to public water systems. These standards limit the concentrations of specific contaminants that can adversely affect public health and which are known or anticipated to occur in public water supplies. Radionuclide An unstable form of a chemical element that radioactively decays, resulting in the emission of nuclear radiation. Reporting Limit The lowest concentration at which a contaminant is reported. Secondary Drinking Water Standards Non - enforceable federal guidelines regarding cosmetic effects (such as tooth or skin discoloration) or aesthetic effects (such as taste, odor or color) of drinking water. Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level (SMCL) Non - enforceable federal limits set for contaminants included in the Secondary Drinking Water Standards. The purpose of these limits is to assist public water systems in managing their drinking water for aesthetic considerations. Volatile Organic Contaminant (VOC) Group of organic chemicals characterized by their volatility (ability to evaporate). Volatile organic contaminants are widely used in the manufacture of plastics, clothing and other common household items. 5 Client: Tara Bizily Contaminant Bacteriologicals Total Coliform E. coli DrinkWell(TM) Water Testing www.uldrinkwell.com Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Report M 151479 Testing Results Detail Result Absent Absent Reporting Limit Federal Limit Absent Absent Absent Absent r Continued on the following page 6 Client: Tara Bizily Contaminant Regulated Metals Arsenic Lead DrinkWell(TM) Water Testing www.uldrinkwell.com Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Report #: 151479 Testing Results Detail Result Reporting Limit Federal Limit ND 5 ug /L 10 ug /L ND 5 ug /L 15 ug /L Continued on the following page 7 Client: Tara Bizily Contaminant Inorganics Nitrate N itrite Turbidity' DrinkWell(TM) Water Testing www.uldrinkwell.com Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Report #: 151479 Testing Results Detail Result 1.1 mg /L ND 4.2 NTU Reporting Limit Federal Limit 1 mg /L 0.1 mg /L 0.1 NTU 10 mg /L 1 mg /L 0.3 NTU * The accuracy of the test results for turbidity may be significantly affected by the elapsed time from sampling to analysis. On -site confirmation of turbidity is recommended before the installation of treatment equipment to correct reported deficiencies of turbidity in the quality of your water. Continued on the following page 8 DrinkWell(TM) Water Testing www.uldrinkwell.com Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Client: Tara Bizily Report #: 151479 Testing Results Detail Contaminant Result Reporting Limit Federal Limit Aesthetics Total Alkalinity 13 mg /L as 10 mg /L as N/A CaCO3 CaCO3 Total Hardness** 81 mg /L as 10 mg /L as N/A CaCO3 CaCO3 Iron 1.8 mg /L 0.1 mg /L 0.3 mg /L Manganese 31 ug /L 5 ug /L 50 ug /L pH * ** 6.8 N/A 6.5-8.5 Sodium 20 mg /L 0.1 mg /L N/A Iron - Related Bacteria 5000 cfu /ml 100 cfu /mL N/A ** The EPA has not established a limit for total hardness but water can be classified as soft (0 -75 mg /L CaCO3), moderately hard (75 -150 mg /L CaCO3), hard (150 -300 mg /L CaCO3) and very hard (> 300 mg /L CaCO3). * ** The accuracy of the test results for pH may be significantly affected by the elapsed time from sampling to analysis. On -site confirmation of pH is recommended before the installation of treatment equipment to correct reported deficiencies of pH in the quality of your water. 0 Tri -City / William Lloyd Analytical Laboratory 9300 Poplar Bridge Road Bloomington, MN 55437 952.563.4904 Report Date: 10/17/2007 Client: Date Collected: Date Received: Time Received: Lab No: Client Sample ID: City of Edina 10/15/2007 10/15/2007 13:45 AA30602 4000 Lynn Ave Iron(mg /L) 0.052 Mangan ese(�9 /L) 1.15 Turbidity(NTU) 20.0 Hdrdness(mg /L) 70 Phosphorus(mg /L) 0.33 Alkelinity(mg /L) 24 Total Coliform(P /A) Absent *HPC(cfu /IOOmL) TNTC * *VOC(.,g /L) 25.09 THM's .IE -, S I Cr'il ��' 10W Turbidity is excessively high should be <1 NTU for filtered water *HPC = Heterotrophic Plate Count * *VOC = Volatile Organic Compound TNTC = Too numerous to count Approved by: Deb Weltzin. Lab Analyst i Tri -City / William Lloyd Analytical Laboratory 9300 Poplar Bridge Road Bloomington, MN 55437 952.563.4904 Report Date: 10/17/2007 Client: Date Collected: Date Received: Time Received: Lab No: Client Sample M. City of Edina 10/15/2007 10/15/2007 13:45 AA30603 4005 Lynn Ave Iron(mg /L) 0.10 Manganese(,Lq /L) 4.04 Turbidity(NTU) 21.9 Hardness(mg /L) 74 Phosphorus(mg /L) 0.40 Alkalinity(mg /L) 26 Total Coliform(P/A) Present x2 *HPC(cfu /100mL) TNTC Total Chlorine(m3/0 0.02 * *VOC(pg /L) 27.80 THM's Turbidity is excessively high shuld be < 1NTU for filtered water *HPC = Heterotrophic Plate Count * *VOC = Volatile Organic Compound TNTC = Too numerous to count Approved by: Deb Weltzin Lab Analyst 7 f Tr -City /William Lloyd Analytical Laboratory 9300 Poplar Bridge Road Bloomington, MN 55437 952.563.4904 Report Date: Client: Date Collected: Date Received: Time Received: Lab No: Client Sample ID Iron(mg /L) Mangan ese( /L) Hardness(mg /L) 10/17/2007 City of Edina 10/15/2007 10/15/2007 13 :45 AA30607 4116 Lynn Ave 0.12 2.5 62 Phosphorus(mg /L) 0.29 Alkalinity(mg /L) 18 Total Coliform(P /A) Absent *HPC(cfu/100mQ >2000 est Total Chlorine(mg /L) 1.48 * *VOC(Ng /L) 23.88 THM's *HPC = Heterotrophic Plate Count * *VOC = Volatile Organic Compound . est = estimate Approved by: Deb Weltzin Lab Analyst 4� �4'— �r Tri -City /William Lloyd Analytical Laboratory 9300 Poplar Bridge Road Bloomington, MN 55437 952.563.4904 Report Date: 10/17/2007 Client: Date Collected: Date Received: Time Received: Lab No: Client Sample ID: City of Edina 10/15/2007 10/15/2007 13:45 AA30604 4002 Inglewood Ave Iron(mg /L) 0.084 Manganese(Nq &) 8.61 Hardness(mg /L) 70 Phosphorus(mg /L) 0.15 Alkalinity(mg /L) 23 Total Coliform(P /A) Absent *HPC(cfu/loomL) 280 est. * *VOC(Ng /L) 25.76 THM's *HPC = Heterotrophic Plate Count * *VOC = Volatile Organic Compound est = estimate Approved by: Deb Weltzin Lab Analyst Tri -City /William Lloyd Analytical Laboratory n 9300 Poplar Bridge Road Bloomington, MN 55437 952.563.4904 Report Date: Client: Date Collected: Date Received: Time Received: Lab No: Client Sample ID Iron(mg /L) Mangan ese( /L) Turbidity([QTU) HardnesS(mg /L) 10/17/2007 City of Edina 10/15/2007 10/15/2007 13:45 AA30605 4011 Kipling Ave 0.020 0.403 3.09 80 Phosphorus(mg /L) 0.28 Alkalinity(mg /L) 30 Total Coliform(P /A) Absent *HPC(cfu /100mQ 310 est. T _x`,1.1 ( "'-,I,>';;-Ie'::,,.'t" 0.07 * *VOC(Ng /L) 31.78 THM's Turbidity is moderately high *HPC = Heterotrophic Plate Count * *VOC = Volatile Organic Compound est = estimate Approved by: Deb Weltzin Lab Analyst l- Tri -City ( William Lloyd Analytical Laboratory 9300 Poplar Bridge Road Bloomington, MN 55437 952.563.4904 Report Date: 10/17/2007 Client: Date Collected: Date Received: Time Received: Lab No: Client Sample ID: City of Edina 10/15/2007 10/15/2007 13 :45 AA30606 4116 Grimes Ave Iron(mg /L) 0.10 Mangonese(,.g /L) 0.43 Turbidity(NTU) 0.70 Hardness(mg /L) 70 Phosphorus(mg /L) 0.33 Alkalinity(mg /L) 25 Total Coliform(P/A) Absent *HPC(cfu /100mL) 1 Total Chlorine(mg /L) 1.58' * *VOC(pg /L) 29.56 THM's *HPC = Heterotrophic Plate Count * *VOC = Volatile Organic Compound Approved by: Deb Weltzin Lab Analyst a Tri- City/ William Lloyd Analytical Laboratory 9300 Poplar Bridge Road Bloomington, MN 55437 952.563.4904 City of Edina 4801 W. 50" St. Edina, MN 55424 Date Sampled: 10 /17 /0 ff Sampled By: Matt Egan For Laboratory Use Only: Receiving Date /Initials: 10/17/o7 TT Sample Condition Upon Receipt: ■ ❑ Other Client Contact: Rodger Glanzer Client No.: 952 - 8263011 Client Fax: 952- 826 -0392 Laboratory Results Time: _9:25 Total coliform (by method 40 CFR 141) Date Analyzed: 10/17/07 Analyzed By:- TT- Sample Identification Time Sampled Total Coliform (Presence Absence) Lab ID# 4005 Lynn bathroom sink 8:37arn Absent AA3o618 4005 Lynn kitchen sink 8:28am Present AA3o619 4002 Lynn bathroom sink 8:46am Absent AA3o620 Comments: Laboratory Identification Number: 027 - 053 -355 The results in this report apply only to the above listed samples. All routine quality assurance procedures were followed, unless otherwise noted in the comments section. This analytical report must be reproduced in its entirety. Chlorine • • • Area - -- bf = before flushing - -- af = after • „ ����� • Chlorine Level Tests in the Morningside Area Kipling Ave W 42nd St Comments Date Time 4000 4101 4117 4201 10/24/2007 10:30 AM 1.2 ml /L Flushed until clear 10/24/2007 10:50 AM 1.8 ml /L 10/24/2007 3:50 PM 1.4 ml /L Flushed until clear 10/24/2007 4:15 PM 2.2 ml /L 10/24/2007 8:55 AM 1.02 ml /L ok AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. October 25, 2007 City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Attn: Mr. Jesse Struve, Utility Engineer RE: Water Pipe Assessment City of Edina Edina, Minnesota AET Project No. 03 -03003 Dear Mr. Struve: CONSULTANTS • ENVIRONMENTAL • GEOTECHNICAL • MATERIALS • FORENSICS Attached is the report of the Water Pipe Assessment project. We appreciate the opportunity to have been of service to you on this project. If you have any questions regarding this project or if we can be additional service please contact me. Sincerely, American Engineering Testing, Inc. Robert A. Kaiser, Vice President Environmental Division Phone: (651) 659 -1308 Fax: (651) 659 -1379 e -mail: rkaiser @amengtest.com This document shall not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval of American Engineering Testing, Inc. 550 Cleveland Avenue North • St. Paul, MN 55114 Phone 651- 659 -9001 • Toll Free 800 - 972 -6364 • Fax 651 - 659 -1379 • www.amengtest.com Offices throughout Florida, Minnesota, South Dakota & Wisconsin AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AND EOUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER WATER PIPE ASSESSMENT PROJECT: REPORTED TO: WATER PIPE CITY OF EDINA Edina, Minnesota 4801 West 50''' Street Edina, MN 55424 AET JOB NO: 03 -03003 ATTN: Mr. Jesse Struve DATE: October 23, 2007 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of the assessment of a section of water pipe that had deposits of unknown material on the inside of the pipe. The purpose of our services were to conduct an assessment of the deposits to determine their composition and conduct thickness testing of the pipe wall to determine if the integrity of the pipe has been affected by the deposits. The scope of services included the following: Collect a sample of the deposits on the inside of the water pipe and submit the sample to a laboratory for analysis by Inductively Coupled Plasma Spectrometry (ICP) to determine the elemental content of the deposits. 2. Assess the wall thickness of the water pipe by ultrasonic testing to determine if the pipe has been impacted by corrosion. 3. Prepare a written report presenting the results of the assessment of the water pipe and deposits. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The following background information was provided to AET: The City of Edina Water Department removed a section of the water pipe in the area of Lynn Avenue South and 400' Street West in the Morningside area of Edina, Minnesota. Upon removal from the ground, the section of water pipe was observed to contain deposits on the inside of the pipe. This pipe had apparently been in service since the 1920's or 1930's and conveyed water from the City of Minneapolis. City of Edina Water Pipe Edina, Minnesota October 23, 2007 AET Job No. 03 -03003 — Page 2 of 3 FIELD OBSERVATIONS AND SAMPLING PROCEDURES AET received the section of water pipe from the Edina Water Department on October 11, 2007. The section of water pipe was a ductile iron pipe about 6 inches in diameter.. The deposits on the inside of the pipe were rust colored and not friable. The deposits appeared in a random pattern and were approximately 1 to 1.5 inches thick. A sample of the deposits was collected from the inside of the water pipe section using a hammer and chisel to break the deposit free of the pipe wall. The deposit separated cleanly from the pipe wall, was placed in a whirl -pak bag, and delivered to Pace Analytical Services for chemical analysis. The water pipe section was then subjected to ultrasonic testing at AET to determine the thickness of the pipe wall at various locations. WATER PIPE ASSESMENT RESULTS The results of the analysis of the water pipe deposits indicate the deposits consist of over 75 per cent iron with less than 1 per cent of aluminum and less than 1 per cent of calcium based on dry weight. The water content of the sample was 21.2 per cent. Trace concentration of other metals are also present. The complete results of the sample analysis are tabulated in Table 1. The complete laboratory report is attached to this report. The chemical analysis method that was selected for this analysis (ICP) only detects metals. The analysis results account for about 77 per cent of the dry weight mass of the sample. The remaining 23 per cent of the sample mass likely consists of non metal elements such as oxygen (in the form of iron oxides or rust), carbon (in the form of carbonates) and silicon (in the form of silicates). Further analysis of the deposits could be conducted if it is desired to quantify these non - metallic elements. The pipe wall thickness was determined by ultrasonic testing at six locations on the section of water pipe. The six wall thickness measurements were: 0.400 inches, 0.380 inches, 0.394 inches, 0.388 inches, 0.438 inches, and 0.426 inches. City of Edina Water Pipe Edina, Minnesota October 23, 2007 AET Job No. 03 -03003 — Page 3 of 3 Observations of the inside of the water pipe after the deposits were removed did not indicate any significant corrosion, pitting, or other adverse impacts to the pipe wall. CLOSURE AET's services for this project have been conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in this area under similar budget and time constraints. No warranty, express or implied, is made. Robert A Kaiser, Vice President Environmental Division _Q --/ (. - David Fitterer, Manager Non Destructive Testing Department ATTACHMENTS Table 1 - Water Pipe Deposits Sample Results Appendix A - Shop/Field Inspection Report Appendix B - Pace Analytical Services Laboratory Report Table 1 Water Pipe Deposits Sample Results City of Edina Edina, Minneasota AET Project No. 03 -03003 Water Pipe Deposits Laboratory Anayltical Results Aluminum 6,790 mg/kg (0.679 %) Antimony ND Arsenic ND Barium 40.6 mg/kg Beyllium ND Boron 244 mg/kg Cadmium ND Calcium 5,680 mg/kg (0.568 %) Chromium 8.8 mg/kg Cobalt ND Copper ND Iron 756,000 mg/kg (75.6 %) Lead 12.4 mg/kg Magnesium 651 mg/kg Manganese 423 mg/kg Molybdenum ND_ Nickel ND Potassium ND Selenium ND Silver ND Sodium ND Thallium ND Tin ND Titanium ND Vanadium 91.0 mg/kg Zinc 31.1 mg/kg All results are reported on a dry weight basis. The moisture content of the sample was 21.2°/x. mg/kg - milligrams per kilogram equal to parts per million by weight % - per cent by weight ND - Not Detected SHOP/FIELD INSPECTION REPORT Date of Inspection: lv ._L3 -1-7 Project No. C7 ,0 30 d 3 Type of Inspection: u ,;f- -775'. ,�Z -4c P.O. No: Project: 41e -1 Client: Location of Inspection:'- - S. Type of Equipment: Code Requirements: Procedure No: TEST RESULTS: Technician: ` Assistant: SNT -TC -1A el: I l III Prep Time Lv Lab Arr Job Lv Job Arr Lab Travel Time Job Time Mileage Type of Inspection Vehicle 06- CEN -115A (6 -03) AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING, INC. 1!2ce A'nalytical x+nr.peealeDa.com October 19, 2007 Mr. Bob Kaiser American Engineering Testing 550 Cleveland Ave. N. St. Paul, MN 55114 RE: Project: 03 -03003 WATERPIPE,EDINA,MN Pace Project No.: 1060872 Pace Analytical Services, Inc. RECEIVED OCT 22 1007 100 Elm Street Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607-1700 Dear Mr. Kaiser: Enclosed are the analytical results for sample(s) received by the laboratory on October 12, 2007. The results relate only to the samples included in this report. Results reported herein conform to the most current NELAC standards, where applicable, unless otherwise narrated in the body of the report. If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, r Diane J. And r on diane.anderson @pacelabs.com Project Manager Florida (Nelap) Certification #: E87605 Illinois Certification #: 200011 Iowa Certification #: 368 Minnesota Certification #: 027 - 053 -137 Wisconsin Certification #: 999407970 Enclosures REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. of Page 1 of 9 2ceAnaly4ical i www.pacelabs.wm SAMPLE SUMMARY, Project: 03 -03003 WATERPIPE,EDINA,MN Pace Project No.: 1060872 Lab ID Sample ID Matrix Date Collected Date Received 1060872001 1 PIPE DEPOSITS Solid 10/12107 13:30 10/12/07 14:45 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 1700 Elm Street Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607 -1700 Page 2 of 9 0 ace Analytical www.psee1VbS.C= SAMPLE ANALYTE COUNT Project: 03 -03003 WATERPIPE,EDINA,MN Pace Project No.: 1060872 Lab ID Sample ID Method 1060872001 1 PIPE DEPOSITS % Moisture EPA 6010 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 1700 Elm Street Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607.1700 Analytes Reported 1 27 a Page 3 of 9 aceAnalyical ww ..pocelsbsxom ANALYTICAL RESULTS Project: 03 -03003 WATERPIPE,EDINA,MN Pace Project No.: 1060872 Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 1700 Elm Streel Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607.1700 Sample: 1 PIPE DEPOSITS Lab ID: 1060872001 Collected: 10/12/07 13:30 Solid results reported on dry weight basis Parameters Results Units Report Limit DF Received: 10/12/07 14:45 Matrix: Solid Prepared Analyzed CAS No. Qual 6010 MET ICP Analytical Method: EPA 6010 Preparation Method: EPA 3050 Aluminum 6790 mg /kg 11.0 1 10/15/07 18:43 10/16/07 11:17 7429 -90-5 P6 Antimony ND mg/kg 0.55 1 10/15107 18:43 10/16/07 11:17 7440 -36 -0 MO Arsenic ND mg/kg 0.55 1 10/15/07 18:43 10/16/07 11:17 7440 -38 -2 MO Barium 40.6 mg/kg 0.55 1 10/15/07 18:43 10/16/07 11:17 7440 -39 -3 MO Beryllium ND mg/kg 0.28 1 10/15/07 18:43 10/16/07 11:17 744011 -7 MD Boron 244 mg/kg 8.3 1 10/15/07 18:43 10/16107 11:17 7440A2 -8 MO Cadmium ND mg /kg 0.055 1 10/15/07 18:43 1b /16/07 11:17 7440 -43 -9 MO Calcium 5680 mg/kg 27.6 1 10/15/07 18:43 10/16%07 11:17 7440 -70 -2 P6 Chromium 8.8 mg/kg 0.55 1 10/15/07 18:43 10/16/07 11:17 7440-47 -3 MO Cobalt ND mg/kg 0.55 1 10/15/07 18:43 1D/16/07 11:17 7440 -48A MO Copper ND mg/kg 0.55 1 10/15/07 18:43 10/16/07 11:17 7440 -50 -8 MO Iron 756000 mg /kg 276 100 10/15/07 18:43 10/16/07 14:03 7439 -89-6 P6 Lead 12.4 mg /kg 0.33 1 10/15/07 18:43 10/16/07 11:17 7439 -92 -1 MO Magnesium 651 mg/kg 27.6 1 .10/15/07 18:43 10/16/07 11:17 7439 -95-4 MO Manganese 423 mg/kg 0.28 1 10/15/07 18:43 10/16/07 11:17 7439 -96 -5 MO Molybdenum ND mg/kg 0.83 1 10/15/07 18:43 10/16107 11:17 7439 -98 -7 MO Nickel ND mg /kg 1.1 1 , 10/15/07 18:43 10/16/07 11:17 7440 -02 -0 MO Potassium ND mg /kg 138 1 10/15/07 16:43 10116/07 11:17 7440 -09 -7 MO Selenium ND mg/kg 0.83 1 10/15/07 18:43 10116/07 11:17 7782 -49 -2 MO Silver ND mg/kg 0.55 1 10/15/07 18:43 10/16/07 11:17 7440 -22-4 MO Sodium ND mg/kg 55.2 1 10/15/07 18:43 10116/07 11:17 7440 -23 -5 MO Thallium ND mg/kg 1.1 1 10/15/07 18:43 10/16/07 11:17 7440 -28-0 MO Tin ND mg/kg 4.1 1 10/15/07 18:43 10/16107 11:17 7440 -31 -5 MO Titanium ND mg/kg 1.4 1 10115/07 18:43 10/16/07 11:17 7440 -32-6 MO Total Hardness by 2340B 16900 mg/kg 148 1 10/15/07 18:43 10/16/07 11:17 Vanadium 91.0 mg/kg 0.83 1 10/15/07 18:43 10/16/07 11:17 7440 -62 -2 MO Zinc 31.1 mg/kg 1.1 1 10/15/0718:43 10/16/07 11:17 7440 -66-0 MO Analytical Method: % Moisture Percent Moisture 21.2 % 0.10 1 10/15/07 00:00 Date: 10/19/2007 09:55 AM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. Page 4 of 9 25ceAnalyfical' www.pacetabs.com QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: 03 -03003 WATERPIPE,EDINA,MN Pace Project No.: 1060872 QC Batch: MPRP /10407 Analysis Method: % Moisture QC Batch Method: % Moisture Analysis Description: Dry Weight/Percent Moisture Associated Lab Samples: 1060872001 Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 1700 Elm Street Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607 -1700 SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 400709 1060873001 Dup Max Parameter Units Result Result RPD RPD Qualifiers Percent Moisture % 4.5 5.0 9 30 SAMPLE DUPLICATE: 400710 Parameter Percent Moisture Date: 10/19/2007 09:55 AM 1060872001 Dup Units Result Result % 21.2 21.6 Max RPD RPD Qualifiers 2 30 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall.not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. i- LL�i1C1L.; Page 5 of 9 acemalytical www.paeelabs:com_ QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: 03 -03003 WATERPIPE,EDINA,MN Pace Project No.: 1060872 QC Batch: MPRP /10412 Analysis Method: EPA6010 QC Batch Method: EPA 3050 Analysis Description: 6010 MET Associated Lab Samples: 1060872001 METHOD BLANK 400841 Associated Lab Samples: 1060872001 Parameter Aluminum Antimony Arsenic Barium Beryllium Boron Cadmium Calcium Chromium Cobalt Copper I ron Lead Magnesium Manganese Molybdenum Nickel Potassium Selenium Silver Sodium Thallium Tin Titanium Total Hardness by 2340B Vanadium Zinc mg /kg mg /kg mg /kg mg /kg mg /kg mg/kg mg /kg mg /kg mg/kg mg/kg mg/kg mg /kg mg /kg mg/kg mg/kg mg /kg mg /kg mg /kg mg/kg mg /kg mg /kg mg /kg mg /kg mg/kg mg /kg mg/kg mg/kg Units Blank Result ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND ND Reporting Limit 8.7 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.22 6.5 0.043 21.7 0.43 0.43 0.43 2.2 0.26 21.7 0.22 0.65 0.87 109 0.65 0.43 43.5 0.87 3.3 1.1 117 0.65 0.87 Qualifiers LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: Parameter 400842 Spike Units Conc. LCS Result LCS % Rec % Rec Limits Aluminum mg/kg 455 439 96 80 -120 Antimony mg /kg 45.5 44.1 97 80-120 Arsenic mg /kg 45.5 46.8 103 80 -120 Barium mg /kg 45.5 47.7 105 80 -120 Beryllium mg/kg 45.5 46.8 103 80 -120 Boron mg/kg 45.5 44.0 97 80 -120 Cadmium mg/kg 45.5 45.9 101 80 -120 Calcium mg /kg 455 441 97 80-120 Chromium mg/kg 45.5 47.7 105 80 -120 Cobalt mg/kg 45.5 47.3 104 80 -120 Date: 10/19/2007 09:55 AM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. I Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 1700 Elm Street Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607.1700 Qualifiers Page 6 of 9 J aceAnalytical ~.p0ca18b5:cvm QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: 03 -03003 WATERPIPE,EDINA MN Pace Project No.: 1060872 LABORATORY CONTROL SAMPLE: Parameter 400842 Units Spike Conc. LCS Result LCS % Rec % Rec Limits Copper mg/kg 45.5 46.8 103 80-120 Iron mg/kg 455 429 94 80 -120 Lead mg/kg 45.5 45.9 101 80 -120 Magnesium mg/kg 455 447 98 80 -120 Manganese mg /kg 45.5 47.7 105 80 -120 Molybdenum mg/kg 45.5 43.8 96 80 -120 Nickel mg/kg 45.5 47.7 105 80 7120 Potassium mg/kg 455 435 96 80 -120 Selenium mg/kg 45.5 48.2 106 80 -120 Silver mg /kg 22.7 22.4 98 80 -120 Sodium mg/kg 455 445 98 80-120 Thallium mg /kg 45.5 49.1 108 80 -120 Tin mg /kg 45.5 44.2 97 80 -120 Titanium mg/kg 45.5 44.3 98 80 -120 Total Hardness by 23406 mg/kg 36.9 2940 59 61 Vanadium mg/kg 45.5 47.7 105 80-120 Zinc mg/kg 45.5 47.3 104 80 -120 MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 400843 Parameter Units Aluminum mg/kg Antimony mg/kg Arsenic mg/kg Barium mg /kg Beryllium mg /kg Boron mg /kg Cadmium mg /kg Calcium mg/kg Chromium mg/kg Cobalt mg/kg Copper mg/kg Iron mg/kg Lead mg /kg Magnesium mg /kg Manganese mg /kg Molybdenum mg /kg Nickel mg/kg Potassium mg/kg Selenium mg/kg Silver mg/kg Sodium mg /kg Thallium mg /kg Tin mg /kg Titanium mg/kg Total Hardness by 2340B mg/kg Date: 10/19/2007 09:55 AM 400844 Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 1700 Elm Street Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607 -1700 Qualifiers MS MSD 1060872001 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD % Rec Max Result Conc, Conc. Result Result % Rec % Rec Limits RPD RPD Qual 6790 628 577 6970 7380 30 103 75-125 6 30 P6 ND 62.8 57.7 34.7 26.0 55 45 75-125 29 30 MO ND 62.8 57.7 30.2 28.4 48 49 75-125 6 30 MO 40.6 62.8 57.7 60.6 62.9 32 39 75-125 4 30 MO ND 62.8 57.7 39.5 43.3 63 75 75-125 9 30 MO 244 62.8 57.7 234 268 -15 42 75-125 13 30 MO ND 62.8 57.7 36.9 35.1 59 61 75-125 5 30 MO 5680 628 577 6530 7850 135 375 75-125 18 30 P6 8.8 62.8 57.7 53.3 58.3 71 86 75 -125 9 30 MO ND 62.8 57.7 31.8 31.9 51 55 75-125 .3 30 MO ND 62.8 57.7 28.7 28.8 46 50 75-125 .3 30 MO 756000 628 577 402000 498000 -56300 -44600 75-125 21 30 P6 12.4 62.8 57.7 41.8 41.5 47 51 75-125 .7 30 MO 651 628 577 880 981 36 57 75-125 11 30 MO, P6 423 62.8 57.7 288 342 -215 -142 75-125 17 30 MO ND 62:8 57.7 23.4 21.9 37 38 75-125 7 30 MO ND 62.8 57.7 30.2 29.8 48 52 75-125 1 30 MO ND 628 577 435 492 68 84 75-125 12 30 MO ND 62.8 57.7 ND ND 0 0 75-125 0 30 MO ND 31.5 28.8 16.1 15.1 51 52 75-125 7 30 MO ND 628 577 479 547 71 90 75 -125 13 30 MO ND 62.8 57.7 12.2 7.7 19 13 75 -125 45 30 MO ND 62.8 57.7 26.0 27.9 41 48 75-125 7 30 MO ND 62.8 57.7 36.4 37.6 57 65 3 30 MO 16900 19900 23600 17 REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 7 of 9 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. %vela 7;5'ceAnalyticalb i wWW.pecezbseom r I QUALITY CONTROL DATA Project: 03 -03003 WATERPIPE,EDINA,MN Pace Project No.: 1060872 Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 1700 Elm Street Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607 -1700 MATRIX SPIKE & MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE: 400843 400844 MS MSD 1060872001 Spike Spike MS MSD MS MSD % Rec Max Parameter Units Result Conc. Conc. Result Result % Rec % Rec Limits RPD RPD Qual Vanadium mg /kg 91.0 62.8 57.7 128 129 58 66 75 -125 1 30 MO Zinc mg /kg 31.1 62.8 57.7 52.4 46.8 34 27 75-125 11 30 MO Date: 10/1912007 09:55 AM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of PPa�ac//e+ A���� nalytical Services, Inc.. �G>IGLr,..J Page 8 of 9 _ aceAnalXical www.paceibbs.com QUALIFIERS Project: 03 -03003 WATERPI PE, EDINA,MN Pace Project No.: 1060872 DEFINITIONS Pace Analytical Services, Inc. 1700 Elm Street Minneapolis, MN 55414 (612)607 -1700 DF - Dilution Factor, if reported, represents the factor applied to the reported data due to changes in sample preparation, dilution of the sample aliquot, or moisture content. ND - Not Detected at or above adjusted reporting limit. J - Estimated concentration above the adjusted method detection limit and below the adjusted reporting limit. MDL - Adjusted Method Detection Limit. S - Surrogate 1,2- Diphenylhydrazine (8270 listed analyte) decomposes to Azobenzene. Consistent with EPA guidelines, unrounded data are displayed and have been used to calculate % recovery and RPD values. LCS(D) - Laboratory Control Sample (Duplicate) MS(D) - Matrix Spike (Duplicate) DUP - Sample Duplicate RPD - Relative Percent Difference NC - Not Calculable. Pace Analytical is NELAP accredited. Contact your Pace PM for the current list of accredited analytes. ANALYTE QUALIFIERS MO Matrix spike recovery was outside laboratory control limits. P6 Matrix spike recovery was outside laboratory control limits due to a parent sample concentration notably higher than the spike level. Date: 10 /1912007 09:55 AM REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS Page 9 of 9 This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Pace Analytical Services, Inc.. L mc:-. AMERICAN St. Paul Office 50 Cleveland Ave. N. ENGINEERING Sf. Paul, MN 55114 TESTING, INC. 651- 659 - 10 379 (fax) ACf Don ICrT All IAADCD l / , 3 .D D .� ❑ OTHER ADDRESS: PHONE: io6o 97;), 10813 Q`"0!'K. -If-- 99-/ 3i PAGE --/— OIL PROJECT NAME/LOCATION (,&JJl C 'C'',' IDS P �� (c�lv,,4 �I� AET PROJECT MANAGER � � P 1r f Q _`'cl C- SEND R RT TO� ANALYSIS C "J REMARKS SAMPLED EFY (11VN ((� (n PRESERVATIVES z w } SAMPLER SIG N E Z w a p cc REQUESTED TURNAROUND TIME: X NORMAL ❑ RUSH > F f� U ui J U) LL DATE NEEDED BY: p O a 0 � 0 w ITEMff SAMPLE DESCRIPTION DATE TIME SAMPLE TYPE z j _ _ _ u- t lo 49 Q rota ;�o Sd 7 SE'eT m �a(UPfSo a rof� i� Wl �rese,► -- — YyUAZ,� �L 3 dam nofi .� /Pa �� to /�L /v7 ITEM NUMBER LINQUIS ED BY/AFFILIATION ACCEPTED BY /AFFILIATION DATE TIME + v tot t Y s- 9, Sample Condition . e Receipt �aceRna"cal Client Name: Project # laog74;� Courier: ❑ Fed Ex ❑ UPS ❑ USPS Client ❑Commercial ❑Pace Other It31i? %:.!!; :` ::i "'• Tracking Custody Seal on Cooler/Box Present: []yes no Seals intact: 13 yes ❑ no Pk�et1 Packing Material: ❑ Bubble Wrap []Bubble Bags None ❑ Other "� Thprmorneter Used 93niQdrYln Tvnn of Ice- Wat Rlue hone\ ❑ Samples on ice, coding process has begun Cooler Temperature `a�j I C. Biological Tissue Is Frozen: Yes No Date and Initials of person ex mining contents: Temp should be above freezing to 6 °C Comments: Chain of Custody Present: Idy.. ONO ONIA 1. Chain of Custody Filled Out: Yes ONO ON/A 2. Chain of Custody Relinquished: Yes ONO ON/A 3. Sampler Name & Signature on COC: es ONO ON/A 4. Samples Arrived within Hold Time: Yes ONO ON/A 5. Short Hold Time Ana" Is <72hr : Oyes No ON/A 6. Rush Turn Around Time Requested: Oyes No ON/A 7. Sufficient Volume: Yea ONO ON/A a. Correct Containers Used: Vfy9s ONO ON/A 9. -Pace Containers Used: Oyes I!JNO ON/A Containers Iptact: Yea ONO ON/A 10. �illered volume received for Dissolved tests OYes ONO J&11A 11. oample Labels match COC: e`Yes ONO ON/A 12. -Includes date/time/ID/Analysis Matrix: L All containers needing preservation have been checked. ❑Yea ONO WA 13. All containers needing preservation are found to be in OYes ONO NIA compliance with EPA recommendation. Initial when Lot a of added exceptions: VOA• . coNorm, TOC, O &G, W I-DRO (water) OYes No completed preservative Samples checked for dechlorination: OYes ONO NIA 14. Heads ace in VOA Vials >6mm : Oyes ONo wA 15. Trip Blank Present: OYSa ONO CJNIA /qwA 16. Trip -Blank Custody Seals Present OYsa ONO Pace Trip Blank Lot Y if purchased): / Client Notification/ Resolution: Field Data Required? Y / N Person Contacted: Datefrime: Comments/ Resolution: `j-p , D I(e Uc� C Uvi X s. fi M S az&K=.�r yt-(.I 44 6, Project Manager Review: Date: ldI 2A2 Note: Whenever there is a discrepancy affecting North Carolina compliance samples, a copy of this form will be sent to the North Carolina DEHNR Certification Office ( i.e out of hold, incorrect preservative, out of temp, incorrect containers) F•ALLC003rev.3. 1 1 September2006 W Pagel of l Wayne Houle From: Wayne Houle Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 3:36 PM To: Gordon Hughes; Roger Glanzer; Jesse Struve Subject: FW: Water Quality Complaints -- Morningside area Zfl Wayne Houle whoule @ci.edina.mn.us 952 - 826 -0443 From: Catlin, Chris L. [mailto: Chris .Catlin @ci.minneapolis.mn.us] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 11:48 AM To: Wayne Houle Cc: Asgian, Marie P. Subject: Water Quality Complaints -- Morningside area Wayne — Let me introduce myself. I'm the Minneapolis Water Plant Superintendent. I copied Marie Asgian on this email... she's the superintendent of water distribution... We're at your service to assist however we can. I've been talking with Roger Glanzer about the situation, and will give you a brief synopsis here. We believe the problem is related to nitrification. Nitrification is a process where ammonia that we add to the water is converted to nitrite and nitrate — sorry for the chemistry lesson... The process is driven by non - pathogenic bacteria that are all around us. These are the critters that allow us to add anhydrous ammonia to farm fields and realize a fertilizer value from it. The bacteria typically grow on the walls of pipes — especially un -lined cast iron pipes. Unfortunately, Minneapolis and Edina and other older communities have such un -lined pipes. The bacteria lower the pH of the water as a part of their life cycle. This lower pH is then corrosive to the old deposits / barnacles / tubercles in the un -lined pipes — thus the red water complaints. The nitrifiers also eat up our chlorine residual in the process. This can leave the water with a stale taste. It is important to note that nitrifying bacteria are not pathogenic — they do not cause disease. We are doing several things at the plant to attempt to control the situation — keeping our pH as high as we can, minimizing the ammonia levels in the water and monitoring the situation closely. We are experiencing the same situation that you are in some of our low use areas. There are a few things that can be done locally to help the situation. Flushing fire hydrants in the area helps keep the water fresh. Frequent flushing is better than longer less frequent flushing. Also, for a longer term solution, cleaning and lining the pipes does wonders. Marie's group has been actively cement lining Minneapolis pipes for several years. This results in an immediate improvement in water quality — there's simply no exposed iron to rust and cause red water issues. I think. Marie has had some conversations with Roger about partnering with us on . 11/1/2007 Page 2 of 2 cleaning and lining — we offer up this service to our suburban customers. I'm sure it would reduce your costs compared with separate contracts. This has been a particularly bad year for nitrification. I'm not sure why, but it is probably water temperature related. We are just on the verge of getting in to cold water conditions, which greatly inhibit the growth of the nitrifiers. Hopefully, things will be better soon — within just the next several days, as the water temperature continues to drop. Again, we are at your service to assist however we can. Please feel free to email or call. My desk phone is 612- 661 -4904, cell is 612- 916 -0546. Chris 11/1/2007 Wayne Houle From: Roger Glanzer Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 10:15 AM To: Jerry Hershey; Jesse Struve Subject: FW: Water Quality in Morningside (Kipling Avenue) FYI - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Gordon Hughes Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 10:01 AM To: Wayne Houle; Roger Glanzer Subject: FW: Water Quality in Morningside (Kipling Avenue) FYI - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Jim Hovland ( mailto :jhovland @krauserollins.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 9:40 AM To: Smith, Tina F. Cc: Gordon Hughes Subject: RE: Water Quality in Morningside (Kipling Avenue) Thanks, Tina. I think our respective city staffs have been woking well together to try to, solve this vexing problem, which does now appear to be a distribution issue. Will you be at the Steger event on November 1st? - - - -- Original Message---- - From: "Smith, Tina F." < Tina .Smith @ci.minneapolis.mn.us> To: "Jim Hovland" <jhovland @krauserollins.com> Cc: " Rybak, R. T.".< R.T.Rybak @ci.minneapolis.mn.us> Sent: 10/30/07 9:00 AM Subject: FW: Water Quality in Morningside (Kipling Avenue) Dear Mayor Hovland - Below is a long email string, the gist of which is that our public works staff has been working with yours to get at the water quality issues you have raised. It looks like the issue is not with the quality of the-Minneapolis water, but with the Edina distribution system: As you can read below, our staff's are working together to try to solve the problem. Thanks very much for raising the issue with us, hope you are well, and we'll look forward to seeing you on November 12th at the RCM meeting. Best, Tina Smith From: Kotke, Steven A Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 5:20 PM To: Rybak, R.T. Cc: Smith, Tina F. Subject: FW: Water Quality in Morningside (Kipling Avenue) 1 Mayor, Just a follow up regarding the Edina water problem. The issue seems to be with their distribution system and not the supply of water we are sending them. Our staff is working with their staff to help fix the problem. Steve - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Asgian, Marie P. Sent: Monday, October 29, To: Rezania, Shahin Cc: Kotke, Steven A Subject: RE: Water Quality 2007 8:20 AM in Morningside (Kipling Avenue) Roger Glanzer, Utilities Superintendent for Edina, has informed me that Edina may be interested in performing 5,000± feet per year in conjunction with Minneapolis Water utilizing our contract. There are some minor details that need to be ironed out (whether they or we would do temporary water supply piping, dig access holes, etc.). Chris Catlin had our water quality lab take samples in the Edina Morningside Community (their distribution system). Here is Chris's synopsis of the situation: From: Catlin, Chris L. Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 11:53 AM To: Rezania, Shahin; Asgian, Marie P. Subject: FW: Water Quality in Morningside (Kipling Avenue) I called Roger Glanzer, and reported back to him that the samples we took from the Edina mains indicated pretty severe nitrification. I told him we're still waiting on a long incubation BART nitrification bacteria test, but the nitrite levels indicate nitrification. I'll send him the full results on Friday. He asked what they can do to fix the problem... I told him frequent flushing to get rid of the low pH water and get new fresher (higher chlorine) water into the mains was the best thing to do. We also went over how our water is getting colder, and the nitrifiers don't do much of anything in cold water, so it should be a lot better in a few weeks. Chris *********************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** 2 a From: Asgian, Marie P. Sent: Monday, October 22, 2007 8:10 AM To: Kotke, Steven A; Rezania, Shahin Cc: Hamilton, Heidi J; Catlin, Chris L. Subject: RE: Water Quality in Morningside (Kipling Avenue) I will contact Wayne Houle today. Minneapolis Water Works has sampled the water on the Minneapolis side of the Edina master meter. Test results for these samples did not indicate a problem with color or any other commonly evaluated water quality parameter on the Minneapolis side of the Edina meter. I reported the results to Dave Rindahl from the Minnesota Department of Health, who has been working closely with Roger Glanser of Edina. On Friday of last week, Chris Catlin, working with the City of Edina, had the Minneapolis Water Quality Lab take samples in the Edina system as a "good neighbor" effort to quantify the water color issues in the Edina system. As with the Minneapolis water distribution system, the Edina Morningside area has unlined cast iron watermains that have many years of mineral deposits built up, causing discolored water and diminished hydraulic flow characteristics (low C factor). The City of Edina is considering cleaning and lining some of their water mains to mitigate the rusty water problem. Since Edina is a wholesale customer of Minneapolis Water, I am proposing that we could (if Edina desires) include some cleaning and.lining of water mains in Edina with our annual project on a reimbursable basis. We have this arrangement with the City of Columbia Heights (5,000 feet /year for the past several years); the City Manager and Public Works Director have been very pleased with the results and feel they have gotten good value for their money. By partnering these communities, costs are reduced overall because of the economy of scale. I will contact Edina today to discuss this issue (and offer contact info for the City of Columbia Heights if desired). Please let me know if there is anything else that you would like me (or any of our staff) to do. Thanks, Marie Asgian, P.E. Superintendent of Water Distribution Minneapolis Water Works (612) 673 -5600 Marie Asgian, P.E. Superintendent of Water Distribution Minneapolis Water Works (612) 673 -5600 - - - -- Original Message - - - -- 3 From: Rezania, Shahin Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 7:19 AM To: Asgian, Marie P. 7c: Kotke, Steven A Subject: FW: Water Quality in Morningside (Kipling Avenue) Importance: High. Marie, Do you have an update on this issue? I appreciate it if you could provide a response today. Thanks, Shahin - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Kotke, Steven A Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 7:16 AM To: Rezania, Shahin Subject: FW: Water Quality in Morningside (Kipling Avenue) - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Colvin Roy, Sandra K Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 11:12 PM To: Kotke, Steven A Subject: RE: Water Quality in Morningside (Kipling Avenue) I'm looking for the answer as well. Thanks. Sandy From: Kotke, Steven A Sent: Mon 10/22/2007 6:43 AM To: Smith, Tina F.; Rybak, R.T. Cc:_ Rezania, Shahin; Hamilton, Heidi J; Asgian, Marie P.; Colvin Roy, Sandra K Subject: RE: Water Quality in Morningside (Kipling Avenue) Hi Mayor, We will look into this issue and get back with you and Mr. Hovland with an update. Steve 4 - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Smith, Tina F. Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 3:22 PM To: Kotke, Steven A Subject: FW: Water Quality in Morningside (Kipling Avenue) Steve - I'm reading this email, and not sure the Mayor copied you. See below, and thanks for your help. Tina From: Rybak, R.T. Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 1:28 PM To: 'Jim Hovland' Cc: Smith, Tina F.; Colvin Roy, Sandra K Subject: RE: Water Quality in Morningside (Kipling Avenue) Thanks for this Jim. This is news to me so I am going to ask Steve Kotke our director of Public Works, to check on this. Steve: fyi, Jim is the Mayor of Edina. From: Jim Hovland [ mailto :jhovland @krauserollins.com) Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 11:01 AM To: Rybak, R.T. Cc: Smith, Tina F. Subject: FW: Water Quality in Morningside (Kipling Avenue) R.T., all of the water for the Morningside neighborhood comes out of the Minneapolis system. the water going to Morningside, as I understand, is not yet going through your new filtering system. I am wondering if there is any help we can secure from your end in expediting an evaluation as to whether there is a system problem at the source. we are searching for potential problems in the distribution lines in Edina. Any help that can be rendered to expedite this investigation will be appreciated. Thanks. James B. Hovland Krause & Rollins, Chtd. 310 Groveland Avenue Minneapolis, MN 55403 612 - 874 -8550 5 1 612 -874 -9362 (fax) From: Laura Fulton [mailto:lfulton @ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 10:33 AM To: Jim Hovland; Housh, Scot; lmmasica @aol.com; ANN SWENSON; jonibennettl2 @comcast.net Cc: Deb Mangen Subject: FW: Water Quality in Morningside (Kipling Avenue) From: Susan C. Mewborn [mailto:scmewborn @usfamily.net] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 6:37 PM To: Laura Fulton Subject: Water Quality in Morningside (Kipling Avenue) City Council Members: I watched the video of the City Council meeting on 10/16/07 because of the presentations about water quality in Morningside. The presenters are not alone in their experiences and concerns. My family has lived at 4004 Kipling Avenue since 1986. We have occasionally had discolored water, but the appearance and taste of the water is the worst it has been in the past twenty -one years, and the problems are intensifying. Our water now regularly carries an orange sediment. It has stained shower tile and has actually deposited "sludge" around the drain opening in sinks -- dark, slimy sludge that does not rinse off but needs to be wiped away. Toilet bowls are discolored. Like one of the presenters of public comments at the Council meeting, I, too, thought the problem was a sewer issue and had the main line cleaned several weeks ago, to no avail. The hydrant on our corner (Kipling and 40th St.) was recently flushed, but the discoloration and sediment quickly returned. Our daughter refuses to drink the water or use it for cooking and is now purchasing water for such use. The water problem is not only a health and sanitary issue but also a property value issue. As a prospective purchaser, if I saw the water in my home, I would look elsewhere. Even if the water is found fit to drink, I suspect that anyone would be reluctant to drink it based on its appearance (or mix it in baby formula, use it for brushing teeth, or wash with it, etc.). If you were to have a pitcher of our water sitting before you during a meeting, you might hesitate to consume it. 11 Thank you for your attention to the Public Comment presenters and to my concerns in this message. I would be pleased to comment at a Council meeting if further responses would be helpful. Respectfully, Susan C. Mewborn 4004 Kipling Avenue South Edina, MN 55416 952 - 925 -5033 - -- USFamily.Net < http: / /www.usfamily.net /dialup.html> - $8.25 /mo! -- Highspeed < http : / /www.usfamily.net /dsl :html> - $19.99/mo! - -- 7 Wayne D. Houle City of Edina Director of Public Works Edina City Hall 4801 West 50t' Street Edina, MN 55424 October 25, 2007 Dear Wayne D. Houle, RECEIVED OCT 2 9 2007 CITY OF EDINA I am a resident of Edina and very concerned about your insufficient reply to the concerns about the quality of the water in our Morningside community. The independent survey of our water conflicts with the results you reported. The independent results indicated turbidity and iron levels far exceeding federal guidelines and elevated levels of bacteria and several other inorganic materials. Who are we to believe? Red water that stains our bathtubs, clothing and toilets provide no assurances that our water is fit to drink. We are being greatly inconvenienced with trips to a laundromat, buying large quantities of water to drink or even brush teeth, and cleaning any surface the water touches. Beyond the inconvenience is a growing, grave concern about the quality of the water we cook with and drink. The City's band -aid solution of delivering a cleaning additive to our homes to address the red laundry water is hardly enough to address this problem. The long -term solution that we must wait until the summer of 2008 or even 2009 when the pipes are relined is unconscionable. The water bill continues at the same rate while we, a small and apparently insignificant neighborhood to the City officials, are expected to cope with a discoloration that you would have us believe is not an indication of an "significant health risk. ". Our neighbors will continue to press the Edina City Council for a timely, safe solution to our water crisis. The solutions you proposed are not acceptable. Thank you for your time and prompt attention to this matter. Sincerely, Tr�" -rn«'ten-' Mary Mason 4012 Lynn Avenue Edina MN 55416 952- 926 -2848 Page 1 of 1 From: Roger Glanzer Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 12:52 PM To: Wayne Houle; Jesse Struve Cc: Jerry Hershey Subject: FW: Edina Samples FYI From: Catlin, Chris L. [mailto: Chris.Catlin@ci. min neapolis. mn. us] Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 11:39 AM To: Roger Glanzer Cc: Malmberg, Richard H Subject: FW: Edina Samples Roger — Here is the data from your samples. This is really showing signs of nitrification — non - pathogenic bacteria eating up the ammonia and destroying the chlorine. The pH's are not THAT low compared to some we've seen, but they certainly could have been lower at another time... the low pH is what causes the rust / carbuncles on the pipe wall to dissolve away and cause the dirty water. The BART test is a count on the number of nitrifying bacteria in the sample. 10,000 is pretty high. I'm sure they were associated with the sediment in the water — the nitrifiers really want to grow ON something, not swim around free in the water. Our water temperature is about 53 today. A couple more degrees down and we'll be done with nitrification for the year. Let us know if there is anything more we can do. Chris - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Malmberg, Richard H Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 10:59 AM To: Catlin, Chris L. Subject: Edina Samples Here re the Edina Results: Address Turbidity Color Alkalinity T. Cl2 NO2 BART pH 4005 Lynn 4.75 38 27 0.1 >0.5 10,000 7.83 40th St. & East Lynn 8.15 48 28 0.3 >0.5 10,000 8.12 4011 Kipling 4.68 48 28 0.5 >0.5 10,000 8.26 4009 Kipling 1.76 23 23 0.4 >0.5 10,000 7.84 The BART results were the highest we've seen so far. Definitely nitrification is going on here. file:// G: \Engineering\Improvements \WM479 Morningside Water Main\2007 northern Mor... 11/1/2007 City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina MN 55424 -1394 October 24, 2007 Dear City of Edina, It is infuriating to have to pay a $115.75 bill when our water in the 4100 block of Lynn Avenue and in surrounding blocks has been deemed unsafe for exceeding federal standards for drinking or cooking. As far back as 2005, this concern as been voiced to the Edina City Council. Our water is brown with large sediments of iron and turbidity. Despite this problem being discussed as the October 15, 2007 Edina Council meeting, we continue to deal with un- potable water even to the point of having to use bottled water to brush teeth, bathe in brown water, and take white and light clothing to the laundromat. Toilets are stained beyond repair. Please refer this letter to the appropriate person in Edina's City Hall who oversees this utility. The City of Edina is risking our health and yet asking us to continue to pay for water that is substandard. Sincerely, Mary Mason 4012 Lynn Avenue Edina MN 55416 952 - 922848 Page 1 of 1 From: Roger Glanzer Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 11:47 AM To: Wayne Houle Cc: Jesse Struve Subject: FW: Water Quality FYI From: Tara Doyle [ mailto:tarakdoyle@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 11:19 AM To: Roger Glanzer; mnbankers @gmail.com Subject: RE: Water Quality Thank you for the test results. We will certainly run some bleech through the faucet. It did test negative when I did similar testing 3 weeks ago, so fortunately this is a recent development. I am concerned about the turbidity results especially at the top of Lynn. I look forward to hearing your insights on this.. Tara Subject: RE: Water Quality Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:10:05 -0500 From: RGlanzer @ci.edina.mn.us To: tarakdoyle @hotmail.com CC: WHoule @ci.edina.mn.us; ]Struve @ci.edina.mn.us Hi Tara, It does appear that you do have a problem with you kitchen faucet. Your bathroom faucet and your neighbor across the street tested negative, but your kitchen faucet is still positive for Total Coliform Bacteria. The new report is attached. Roger Glanzer Utility Superintendent City of Edina 5146 Eden Avenue Edina, MN 55436 rglanzer @ci.edina.mn.us Phone 952 - 826 -0311 Fax 952 - 826 -0392 From: Tara Doyle [mailto:tarakdoyle @ hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 12, 2007 9:41 AM To: Roger Glanzer Subject: Water Quality Please see attached letter. Thank you. Tara Doyle Bizily Help yourself to FREE treats served up daily at the Messenger Cafe. Stop by today file:// G: \Engineering\Improvements \WM479 Morningside Water Main\2007 northern Mor... 11/1/2007 October 13, 2007 Dear Neighbor, //,his �&)+e-r C� e �der'ed w � t� ►r� was /b0 +e�' 61 a �es tdev-t 4,e. ►AeIglk borw Due to ongoing and persistent poor water quality, residents on Lynn Avenue near 40th Street obtained a water test. We wanted to inform neighbors in the area that the test came back with several contaminants exceeding the federal minimum limit. We have been advised by the testing company to not drink or cook with our water. If you have been experiencing discolored water and would like further information or a copy of the test, please contact either Julie Banker at 952- 929 -4069 or Tara Bizily at 952- 922 -0386. We also encourage you to contact the City of Edina Public Works Department at 952- 826 -0311 if you have concerns about your water quality so that the City is aware of the extent of the problem. Testing Results Detail Contaminant: Result Reporting Limit Federal Limit Total Coliform Absent Absent Absent E. 006 Absent Absent Absent Arsenic ND 5 10 u Lead ND 5 u 15 u L. Nitrate 1.1 m 1 mg/L 10 mg/L Nitrite ND 0.1 m 1 m Turbiditr 4.2 NTU 0.1 NTU 0.3 NTU Total Alkalinity 13 mg/L as CaCO3 10 mg/L as CaCO3 WA Total Hardness— 81 mg/L as CaCO3 10 mg/L as CaCO3 WA Iron 1.8 m 0.1 mg/L 0.3 m Manganese 31 ugIL 5 uglL 50 uglL H„- 6.8 WA 6.5-8.5 Sodium 20 m 0.1 m WA Iron - Related Bacteria 5000 cfu /ml 100 efu/mL WA Tara Doyle Bizily, M.D. 4005 Lynn Avenue Edina, MN 55416 Members of City Council City of Edina Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 October 12, 2007 Dear Council Members, N7 Vh c f �� Ol u I am a resident of Edina and I am. writing to express my concern about the quality of the water in my home. I am a neighbor of Julie Banker and I appreciate you hearing her concerns at your recent council meeting. I have been experiencing similar problems with my water since September 2005 and have contacted the Utilities Superintendent, Roger Glanzer, City Engineer, Wayne Houle and the Minnesota Department of Health on multiple occasions to express my concerns and work towards resuming the delivery of safe, clean water to my neighborhood. I have attached copies of a timeline of my communications with the city, private water testing results, references regarding health effects of these results and a summary letter I provided to Mr. Glanzer on October 12, 2007. I hope that you will find these attachments helpful in providing background information. At this time, I am concerned about the safety of the water. Upon learning that the city had not tested the water in affected homes, I sent for private testing. The results indicated turbidity and iron levels far exceeding federal guidelines and elevated levels of bacteria and several other inorganic materials. Excess turbidity provides an environment favorable to microbial growth and disease causing organisms. Unfortunately, I have been unable to find any studies regarding potential health effects resulting from elevated iron levels in drinking water. However, as a physician, I know that excess iron ingestion can cause nausea, stomach cramping, constipation and bloody diarrhea. In addition, one in two hundred Caucasians carry the genetic disorder hemochromatosis and are unable to remove the excess iron from their bodies. Most people who have this disease are not aware of it and, over time, the iron builds up leading to liver failure, heart failure and diabetes. Therefore, I will not drink or cook with this water until it meets minimum federal guidelines for iron contamination and turbidity. I am writing to ask the City Council for any assistance that you can provide that will facilitate expeditious resumption of the delivery of water that meets the minimum federal guidelines for primary and secondary contaminants to my neighborhood. I would also ask that the City of Edina find a way to deliver safe water for drinking and cooking in the interim. Thank you for your time and prompt attention to this matter. Sincerely, Tara Doyle Bizily, M.D. Tara Doyle Bizily, M.D. 4005 Lynn Avenue Edina, MN 554.16 Roger-Glanzer Utilities Superintendent City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 October 12, 2007 Dear Mr. Glanzer, As you know, I have been concerned about water quality and discoloration since moving into my home at 4005 Lynn Avenue two years ago. I know that we have spoken on more than twenty separate occasions and I appreciate that you and your team are working diligently to try to determine the cause of and solution for this problem. During our conversation yesterday, you indicated that you would be willing to share my concerns with other city staff and I am writing to you to provide further details. After noticing the yellow water in our home in September 2005, we contacted the city who flushed the water line and assessed the pipes in our home. The water was sent to the City of Minneapolis for testing and high turbidity was detected. I was told that the problems I was experiencing were due to an old hot water heater. I replaced the water heater at my expense, but unfortunately the quality of the water did not change. The water quality varies over time, however, because I had been unable to get an answer as to what was causing it, I did not want my family drinking this water. For eighteen months, I made weekly trips to my sister's or parent's home to fill jugs of water for drinking. In addition, I purchased bottled- water for my family to drink. For periods'of days to weeks, I have been unable to do laundry in my home without causing staining to the clothing. Currently, I need to take my clothing and bedding to my sister's home or the dry cleaner for laundering in order to prevent further damage. By December of 2006, I realized that many of my neighbors were experiencing the similar concerns with their water. At that point, I contacted the Minnesota Department of Health who began to work with the City of Edina to identify the source of contamination. I was repeatedly told that the contaminant was iron, that the water was safe to use and that iron removing aids could be used to reverse the staining that was occurring on my clothing and household fixtures. The water has been rapidly worsening since August 17, 2007. Although I was repeatedly told water samples had been taken and tested and that the water was contaminated with iron, on September 26, I requested the value of the exact iron level in the affected area. At this time, I learned that this testing had not been done by the city and I undertook the expense of testing the water myself. I used Undenvriter's Laboratories which was recommended by the Minnesota Department of Health. The results of water test previously shared with you were taken from my home on September 27 from the kitchen faucet after 10 minutes of cold flushing. In summary, the results indicate that this water exceeds the federal guidelines for turbidity by more than ten -fold and the federal guidelines for iron by six -fold. Unfortunately, I have been unable to find any studies regarding potential health effects resulting from elevated iron levels in water. However, as a physician, I know that iron excess can cause nausea,' stomach cramping and bloody diarrhea. In the one in 200 Caucasians who carry the gene for hemochromatosis, the body is unable to remove the excess iron ingested and over time it builds up leading to liver failure, heart failure and diabetes. After speaking with you yesterday, I understand that the pipes bringing water to my neighborhood are the likely cause of contamination and will need to be relined or replaced. I was also told that this process would take a minimum of 9 months. In the interim, I request that the following actions be taken: 1. The City of Edina will provide water that meets minimum federal standards for primary and secondary contaminants to the affected homes for drinking and cooking until the problem is resolved. 2. The City of Edina will notify residents of public works projects that will affect the water quality in their homes prior to undertaking the work in any non - emergent situation. 3. The City of Edina will implement a program to track resident complaints about water quality so that when an area begins to experience a problem such as this in the future, it may be identified and addressed in a more timely fashion. 4. The City of Edina «rill undertake a study to determine ways to reduce or repair the property damage that is occurring as a result of repeated exposure to contaminated water and share this with affected residents. 5. The City of Edina will reduce or eliminate the water rates on utility bills of affected customers until the water meets federal standards for primary and secondary contaminants. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. I look forward to continuing to work with you to resolve this serious problem, reduce the risks to the citizens of my neighborhood during the interim, and to one day enjoying safe clean water provided by the City of Edina. Sincerely, Tara Doyle Bizily, M.D. Water Timeline and Health Risks of Turbidity and Iron Water Quality Concerns Timeline- 4005 Lynn Avenue 9/05- Moved into home. Noted yellow water, assumed it was from lack of use. 10/05- No improvement in water, contacted City of Edina. Line to home flushed with cider colored water returned from line. Told this should solve problem. 11/05- No improvement, contacted City of Edina. Water samples sent to Minneapolis. Told had high twbidity and that water heater had likely deteriorated. We are told to replace hot water heater. 1/06 Hot water heater replaced. Cost for plumber, equipment, modifications to pipes $1100. Spring 06- No improvement in discoloration noted after replacing hot water heater. I contacted the city and was told I was only one with problem, it was likely iron and water was safe to drink. Noted continued yellow discoloration throughout spring summer of 2006. We continued to use bottled water for drinking. November- December 2006 - Water worsened. Now ruining white laundry on regular basis and taking some laundry to relative's homes. 12/6/06- Spoke with Roger, told that valve on 42nd had been left open and likely caused current problem, would flush area and problem should go away. 12/12- Water not improved, told to flush hot water tank. Initially I did this twice, and I have continued to flush hot water tank every few weeks since that time. Get rust colored water with flushing and minimal . improvement in hot water quality for a few days, but sediment quickly rebuilds. 12/13/06- contacted Ike Bradlich and MN Dept Health. I was told water likely due to iron leaching from pipe. I was told that iron is not considered health hazard, but that it can cause significant property damage - staining of clothes, sinks, toilets, tubs, dishes, and rusting of pipes, filters, appliances. Spoke with Roger again, told "I've been here 5 years and never had a complaint like this." Stated the city would do some more flushing and that the problem should be gone. Feb -May 07- Continued with yellowed water intermittently. Continued to check in periodically with city/MN Dept health and receive reassurance that water was safe to drink, they just needed to flush more frequently. Offered water samples from my home on multiple occasions, but I was told that neighbors had given samples for testing and water was safe. I was told to increase flushing of water. I did this and our water bill increased by 30% without improvement in water quality. Discussed concerns with Wayne Houle on 4/26 and again assured water was safe and the city was working diligently to find source of problem. 8/17/07 Water color worsens and does not improve. Over past 18 months, I have used bottled water for drinking at cost of approximately $4 weekly or $312. 9/7/07- Installed Reverse Osmosis Filter at cost of $400. 9/7/07 1 spoke again with Roger Glanzer. City working on shut off valves on Grimes, Lynn and Kipling. If the city is unable to improve situation, they will need to evaluate piece of water main. 9/26 Severely discolored, muddy water noted. Called city, told this was safe. When I stated that I could not cook or use sinks with this water as it was clogging my faucets, I was told that it was not a problem and I should go ahead and use water. I asked the city to provide clean water for cooking that evening and I was told this would not be possible. 9/27- Spoke with Roger- Stated water main will be dug up and tested next week. Asked again about safety and told it was iron contamination and that the water is safe. I asked for specific iron level value. Initially, I was told it was zero coming but of Minneapolis. Asked again what it is in my neighborhood and I was told that it has not been tested. I again offered water sample for testing. I was told city would take own samples when digging up water main. I sent samples to UL Drink Well for private testing of water for $250. 10/4- Water main on 40t" and Lynn is dug up. Neighbor, John Pulscher, states "It looked like a sewer line." When I relay comments to Roger he states "It looked worse than a sewer line." 1.0/10- Receive test results from UL Drink-well. Indicate elevated levels of nitrites, manganese, hardness, alkalinity, sodium and iron related bacteria. Levels of turbidity and iron exceed federal limits by several multiples. 10 /11- Spoke with Roger who states the city's tests are still pending. Electronic References for Health Risks related to Turbidity and Iron 1. Environmental Protection Agency www.epa.gov 2. University of Florida http : / /edi s. ifas.ufl. eduJAE009 Iron and Manganese The presence of iron and manganese in large quantities is very easy to notice because of the reddish brown stain these minerals cause. The stain shows on laundry, sinks, and every other object touched by water. Iron is transported by water in a ferrous state forming a clear, colorless solution until it comes into contact with oxygen. Oxygen changes iron to the ferric state which reacts with alkalinity in the water and forms an insoluble brown ferric hydroxide precipitate called "yellow boy." Iron and manganese occur naturally in ground water, but some iron can be added to the water from corroded pipes. Iron and manganese in combination with natural or man-made organic compounds will cause even more staining problems.. Organic compounds react with iron and manganese to form very stable and difficult to remove darkly colored materials. In addition to staining problems, large amounts of these metals can influence the taste of water and cause the development of iron and manganese bacteria, which are not a health hazard but are very unpleasant. They form masses of gelatinous and filamentous organic matter that traps the iron and manganese they use for growth. A good indication of their presence in the system is a brown slimy growth in the toilet flush tank. Turbidity Solid particles suspended in water absorb or reflect light and cause the water to appear "cloudy." These particles are undissolved inorganic minerals or organic matter picked up over or under the ground. Since the earth acts as an excellent filter, the water from deep wells is usually clear without significant amounts of turbidity. This problem is more common in the water from surface supplies. The major problem with turbidity is aesthetics, but in some cases suspended matter can carry pathogens with it. Large amounts of organic matter can also produce stains on sinks, fixtures, and laundry. Much like iron, organic matter in water may also produce colors, unpleasant tastes, and odors. These tastes and odors will affect not only .drinking water, but the foods and beverages prepared with the water.. 3. University of MN http://Nv\vAv.extension.u=.edu/iafo-u/enviro=ent/BD'302.htm Iron is one of the most troublesome contaminants of home eater supplies. Dissolved iron can discolor water or give it a metallic taste. When combined with tea, coffee, or alcoholic beverages, a black appearance and a harsh, offensive taste may result. Vegetables cooked in iron -rich water turn dark and look unappetizing. Iron also causes reddish or rust- colored stains on plumbing fixtures, tableware and laundry. Certain types of bacteria may thrive in water with high iron content and give it a rotten egg smell. 4. Health Risks: a. http: / / -,v<yr�v.medicinenct.com/ script /inain/art.asp ?articlekey =18865 Hemochromotosis Iron overload usually is caused by the disease, hemochromatosis. It is a genetic disease caused by a change (mutation) in a gene that is important in limiting the absorption of iron from the intestine. If an individual is homozygous for a mutated gene, that is, mutated genes are found on both chromosomes that contain the gene, iron absorption from the intestine is abnormally increased. As a result, iron accumulates in organs within the body. Therefore, in this situation, liver, heart, and pancreatic damage from the iron is highly likely, though not invariable. If an individual is heterozygous for a mutated gene, that is, only one of the chromosomes contains a mutated gene and the other chromosome contains a normal gene, there may be an increase in absorption of iron. However, the increase in absorption is less, and there. is no clear evidence that organs are damaged. b. hltp://-,AwNv.water-research.net/manLyanese.htm4l)otential The regulations regarding iron and manganese in drinking water were established as secondary standards, which means the limits were set because of nuisance problems and aesthetic' concerns. It has come to my attention that a portion of the public may be suitable to Iron Overload or Hemochromatosis. The symptoms of hemochromatosis vary and can include: chronic fatigue, arthritis, heart disease, cirrhosis, cancer, diabetes, thyroid disease, impotence, and sterility. "Hereditary hemochromatosis is only one of several iron loading diseases. But its double gene frequency alone is 1 in 200 of the US population have the single gene expression. It is the most common genetic disease, and tragically the most undiagnosed" (Source: Iron Overload Disease- Fact Sheet- see Link at Bottom of Webpage). Water Report from Underwriter's Laboratory: Client: Tara Bizily 4005 Lynn Avenue Edina, MN 55416 Sample Site: Kitchen Sink Collection Date: 09/28/2007 Report #: 151479 LABORATORY REPORT Reported: 10/08/2007 At- A- Glance Testing Results (detailed results on following pages) Bacteriologicals: Green= no detections at or above the Reporting Limit Regulated Metals: Green= no detections at or above the Reporting Limit Inorganics: Red= contaminants detected at or above Federal Limit Volatiles: Not Tested Herbicides: Not Tested Pesticides: Not Tested Industrial Chemicals: Not Tested Radionuclides: Not Tested Aesthetics: Orange= contaminants detected at or above Federal Secondary or recognized Limits Testing Results Detail Contaminant: Result Reporting Limit Federal Limit Total Coliform Absent Absent Absent E. coli Absent Absent Absent Arsenic ND 5 u /L 10 u /L Lead ND 5 ug /L 15 u /L Nitrate 1.1 mg /L 1 m /L 10 m /L Nitrite ND 0.1 mg /L 1 mg /L Turbid i - 4.2 NTU 0.1 NTU 0.3 NTU Total Alkalinity 13 mg /L as CaCO3 10 mg /L as CaCO3 N/A Total Hardness- 81 mg /L as CaCO3 10 mg /L as CaCO3 N/A Iron 1.8 m /L 0.1 m /L 0.3 m /L Manganese 31 u /L 5 u /L 50 u /L H— 6.8 N/A 6.5-8.5 Sodium 20 mg /L 0.1 mg /L N/A Iron - Related Bacteria 5000 cfu /ml 100 cfu /mL N/A * The accuracy of the test results for turbidity may be significantly affected by the elapsed time from sampling to analysis. On -site confirmation of turbidity is recommended before the installation of treatment equipment to correct reported deficiencies of turbidity in the quality of your water. ** The EPA has not established a limit for total hardness but water can be classified as soft (0 -75 mg /L CaCO3), moderately hard (75 -150 mg /L CaCO3), hard (150 -300 mg /L CaCO3) and very hard (> 300 mg /L CaCO3).\ ** The accuracy of the test results for pH may be significantly affected by the elapsed time from sampling to analysis. On -site confirmation of pH is recommended before the installation of treatment equipment to correct reported deficiencies of pH in the quality of your water. Client: Tara Bizily Report #: 151479 2.Contaminants Detected with Related Health Effects & Aesthetics Conditions Below please find a summary of detections for the sample you submitted. The source of any health effect language used in this report is the Federal Register or other United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) documents. For more information on health effects in drinking water, please visit www.epa.gov /safewater. The risk of health problems from exposure to these contaminants depends on several factors. If you have health effect concerns related to your drinking water, you may wish to contact a medical professional such as, your county health department, your doctor or other health care professional. This does not imply UL's endorsement of any of these health care providers and UL assumes no responsibility or liability for any medical advice given to Customer by any party. Sources for aesthetic effect language is the EPA and Rutgers University, Interpreting Chinking Water Quality Analysis, 5th Edition. Shelton, Theodore B. Ph.D. Health Related Contaminants Nitrate Nitrate was detected at 1.1 mg /L which is less than the Federal MCL of 10 mg /L. Turbidity Turbidity was detected at 4.2 NTU which is greater than the Federal MCL of 0.3 NTU. Turbidity has no health effects. However, turbidity can interfere with disinfection and provide a medium for micro_ bial growth. Turbidity may indicate the presence of disease- causing organisms. These organisms include bacteria, viruses, and parasites that can cause symptoms such as nausea, cramps, diarrhea and associated headaches. Aesthetic Related Contaminants Total Alkalinity Total Alkalinity was detected at 13 mg /L as CaCO3. There is no Federal Limit for this contaminant. Total Hardness Total Hardness was detected at 81 mg /L as CaCO3. There is no Federal Limit for this contaminant. Iron Iron was detected at 1.8 mg /L which is greater than the Federal SMCL of 0.3 mg /L. Iron is regulated as a secondary contaminant. It is associated with rusty color, sediment, metallic taste and reddish or orange staining. Manganese Manganese was detected at 31 ug /L which is less than the Federal SMCL of 50 ug /L. Sodium Sodium was detected at 20 mg /L. There is no Federal Limit for this contaminant. Sodium levels in drinking water are usually low and unlikely to be a significant contribution to adverse health effects. The Institute of Medicine of the National Academies of Science recommends 1,500 mg is an adequate sodium intake for adults between the ages of 19 and 50. The recommendation is decreased to 1,300 mg /day for adults between 50 and 70 years and to 1,200 mg /day for adults over 70. In addition, it is recommended that total dietary intake be limited to no more than 2,300 mg /day. Sodium is not a regulated parameter in drinking water, however the U.E. EPA has recommended 20mg /L as a guideline for those individuals on a very low sodium diet (500 mg /day) and 30 to 60 mg /L as levels where the taste of water may be affected. Iron - Related Bacteria Iron- Related Bacteria was detected at 5000 cfu /ml. There is no Federal Limit for this contaminant. Definitions mg/L 1 mg/L or milligram per liter represents 1 part per million (ppm). An example of a part per million is one cent in $1 O,DDD. ug/L 1 ug /L or microgram per liter represents 1 part per billion (ppb). An example of a part per billion is one cent in $1 D million. Action Level The concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other actions which a public water system must take. Aesthetics Contaminant which may affect water quality such as taste, color or odor. Federal Limit Maximum allowable concentration of a contaminant in a public water supply. This applies to primary and secondary limits. Health Effect The source of any health effect language used in the DrinkWell reports is the Federal Register or other USEPA documents. For more information on health effects in drinking water, please visit www.epa.gov /safewater. Herbicide A chemical compound, usually synthetic, used to control weeds. Industrial Chemical Chemicals used or produced primarily in industrial applications. Inorganic Contaminants (IOC) Mineral -based compounds such as metals and nitrates. These contaminants are naturally occurring in some water, but can also enter water through farming, chemical manufacturing and other human activities. Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) The highest concentration of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are set as close to the Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) as feasible using the best available treatment technology and taking cost into consideration. Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) The concentration of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLGs are non - enforceable health goals. N/A Not Applicable. ND None Detected. The contaminant was not detected above the lowest reportable value by the procedure used for analysis. NTU NTU stands for Nephelometric Turbidity Unit which is the unit used to measure turbidity in water. Turbidity refers to the scattering and absorption of light rather than transmission caused by suspended matter such as clay, dissolved organic material and microscopic organisms. Organic Contaminants Carbon -based chemicals, such as solvents and pesticides, which can enter drinking water supplies through runoff from cropland, discharges from industrial operations, underground tanks, spills and other sources. Pesticide A synthetic chemical, used to control pests such as insects and other invertebrates such as worms and nematodes. Primary Drinking Water Standards Legally enforceable standards established by the Federal government that apply to public water systems. These standards limit the concentrations of specific contaminants that can adversely affect public health and which are known or anticipated to occur in public water supplies. Radionuclide An unstable form of a chemical element that radioactively decays, resulting in the emission of nuclear radiation. Reporting Limit The lowest concentration at which a contaminant is reported. Secondary Drinking Water Standards Non - enforceable federal guidelines regarding cosmetic effects (such as tooth or skin discoloration) or aesthetic effects (such as taste, odor or color) of drinking water. Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level (SMCL) Non - enforceable federal limits set for contaminants included in the Secondary Drinking Water Standards. The purpose of these limits is to assist public water systems in managing their drinking water for aesthetic considerations. Volatile Organic Contaminant (VOC) Group of organic chemicals characterized by their volatility (ability to evaporate). Volatile organic contaminants are widely used in the manufacture of plastics, clothing and other common household items. October 10, 2007 Julie and Paul Banker 4000 Lynn Avenue Edina MN 55416 Edina City Council C/o Edina City Hall 4901 W 5e St Edina MN 55416 Dear Edina City Council: This letter is in follow up to my appearance before the City Council on October 2, 2007, with regard to the poor quality of water supplied to our household and to our neighbors. As I stated on October 2, we have lived in our home for almost three years. Before we moved in, the house was remodeled with all new pipes, new hot water heater and new appliances. Since moving in, our water has usually been a slightly yellow color, with occasional days or weeks of orange or brown water. I have notified the city and have been told that the lines were just being flushed, the water is safe and no one else is having this problem. Since fall 2006, the water quality has steadily worsened. This summer our three small children took oraugelbrown/yellow baths on a regular basis. After repeated calls to the Public Works Department, the response was to repeatedly flush the lines, resulting in brown or orange sludgy water being released into our homes and appliances over and over. After discussion with neighbors we lead that the problem is not just with our home. Attached are comments from neighbors attesting to this. We also learned that despite being told the water is safe, the city had not tested the water on our street where the problem exists. Therefore, the neighbors on our street paid for and obtained our own test of the water. The results are attached you will note that several . numbers exceed the federal limit This is not just an inconvenience and property damage issue, but is also a safety issue, as evidenced in the attached article. A length of pipe was cut from Lynn Avenue on October 4, and a neighbor saw the pipe as it was being Ii$ed out and noted that the inside of the pipe looked like a sanitary sewer line. Utilities Superintendent Roger Glanzer indicated that the City is considering coating the existing Pipes. We are concerned whether this is the appropriate remedy given the level of deterioration and buildup in the pipes. We are encouraged that the City is now taking action and we hope that action continues so that we can receive clean water as soon as possible. We would like to know the cause of the problem, the planned fix for the problem and the timeline as to when we can expect this situation to be remedied, so that we as residents can plan our short and long term actions. Thank you for your consideration of this serious matter. Sincerely, l/ 61, V, CL INV Julie and Paul Banker �Q' C5 00 cc MN Dept of Health _-1-1V 7'f? p D s r-- —'v'e, c _j?-/ �eQ �–h 4–:) L` v C-Cr���v� r' S�a�e� wig 4,�,qe G' bolo s, _..,G iy1 Q iJ o wpi 4A.,A hC) pes -a �- o o- nce -uNsj �e-f ✓ �. -6 1c/. 5�yhx#LA-4-A-*-ll /U G7�Ji col ejoAl IT eAc o Go y Pl-ec�r �- L( IWN C9S2) 920- 957 jC wC:,-- oZ c� c S L-� u/� s � {�'S �:�yw C�,� �Nc � l�^e �-� Czw 7 Z- LIQ I live at 4232 Lynn Avenue in Momingside. I am writing today because I am very concerned with the water quality in my home. I have noticed a significant change in the color and taste. My tub, grout and tile is stained orange, ,along with my humidifier tanks. My toilets constantly look like they have not been flushed. Lastly the taste of the water is bad. We no longer use it to brew coffee or to drink. I ask that you have the water and pipes tested immediately. Something must be done to insure that we have best water possible. Thank you for your time. Mindy Greeley �G �J jS X007 fie �� October 15, 2007 Edina City Council Edina, MN Dear City Council Members, We are twelve -year residents of Edina Morningside and have watched our water get worse and worse over the years. The water has more rust in it, tastes worse and smells bad. We are concerned about the taste and appearance and, even though we use filters, we are concerned about the effect of the water on our health. Recently a neighbor paid to have an independent analysis done and the results were frightening. We join with other neighbors to ask you to take immediate action and do what is needed to improve the quality of our water. Please respond and let us know what you plan to do. Sincerely, pd-L Catherine Gray 4006 Lynn Ave Edina, MN 55416 952.929.4885 Barbara Nash 4006 Lynn Ave Edina, MN 55416 952.929.4885 Turbidity Turbidity Education & Notification Campaign ...Offering More Protection for Those at Risk - — - - - - - - -- Turbidity - cloudiness or _ particles in water - is more - ....°�- than Just an aesthetic concern. As turbidity rises, so does =- - the risk of gastrointestinal illness (find out why in column _ , „; •r - - on right). While this might not _ 'be of great concern to most of ' us, the risk for the very young, r the very old, and people with weakened immune systems can be higher. To help people make informed choices about their drinking water, water suppliers have partnered with Interior Health to create the Turbidity Education & Notification Campaign. The campaign educates users about turbidity and notifies them of elevated turbidity levels. The heart of the campaign is the Turbidity Index, a user - friendly tool that shows whether water quality is Good, Fair, or Poor. In keeping with federal standards and provincial regulations, water suppliers regularly test and monitor drinking water to ensure customer safety.. • If turbidity exceeds 1 -NTU (nephelometric turbidity unit), a water supplier will issue a Water Quality Advisory through the local media and, where possible, on websites and at public facilities. Children, the elderly, and people. with weakened immune systems will be advised to drink boiled water or a safe alternative. • Turbidity greater than 5-NTU may trigger a Boil Water Notice, during which all customers will be advised to drink boiled water or a safe alternative. The Provincial Health Officer recommends that 'newborns and people with weakened immune systems drink boiled water at all times if served by an unfiltered surface water source. Link to: Turbidity Spring 2007 Newsletter ap ge 1, page 2 Frequently Asked Questions (PDF) Safe Alternatives to Tap Water Turbidity is an important water quality indicator because contaminants such as bacteria, viruses, and parasites (e.g. Giardia and Crvotosooddium) can attach themselves to the suspended particles in turbid water. These particles interfere with disinfection by shielding contaminants from the disinfectant (e.g. chlorine). nor is chlorine effective in deactivating Cryptosporidium. Turbidity is caused by fine suspended particles of clay, silt, organic and inorganic matter, plankton, and other microscopic organisms that are picked up by water as it passes through a watershed. While turbidity usually results from natural events such as spring runoff or high precipitation, it can also be caused by manmade erosion. Turbidity, reported in nephelometric turbidity units (NTU), is an optical measurement of water's ability to scatter and absorb light rather than transmit it in straight lines. Turbidity levels are much higher in water from, surface sources than in groundwater. Turbidity levels can range from less than 1 -NTU to more than 1,000 -NTU. At 5 -NTU water is visibly cloudy, and at 25 -NTU it is murky. A� i rnt 1-c' Well dater Testing Kit www.uldrinkwell.COM LABORATORY REPORT Client Tara Bizily 4005 Lynn Avenue Edina, MN 55416 Sample Site: Kitchen Sink Collection Date: 09/27/2007 uUnderwriters Laboratories Inc.m Report #: 151479 Received: 09/28/2007 Reported: 10/08/2007 At -A- Glance Testing Results (detailed results on following pages) Bactedologicals Regulated Metals Inorganics Volatiles Herbicides Pesticides Industrial Chemicals Radionuclides Aesthetics Green Green Not Tested Not Tested Not Tested Not Tested Not Tested O nge Legend: Green = no detections at or above the Reporting Limit Yellow = contaminants detected below Federal Limit = contaminants detected at or above Federal Limit prangs = aesthetics contaminants detected at or above Federal Secondary or recognized Limits Thank you for choosing DdnkWell. We appreciate the opportunity to provide you with this report. laboratory results were reviewed and approved by Lead Scientist: 4 •`�= Your ry ' ��,, DrinkWell(TM) Water Testing www.uldrinkweli.com Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Client: Tara Bizily Report #: 151479 Contaminants Detected with Related Health Effects & Aesthetics Conditions Below please find a summary of detections for the sample you submitted. The source of any health effect language used in this report is the Federal Register or other United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) documents. For more information on health effects in drinking water, please visit www.epa.gov /safewater. The risk of health problems from exposure to these contaminants depends on several factors. If you have health effect concerns related to your drinking water, you may wish to contact a medical professional such as, your county health department, your doctor or other health care professional. This does not imply UL's endorsement of any of these health care providers and UL assumes no responsibility or liability for any medical advice given to Customer by any party. Sources for aesthetic effect language is the EPA and Rutgers University, Interpreting Drinking Water Quality Analysis, 5th Edition. Shelton, Theodore B. Ph.D. - Health Related Contaminants Nitrate Nitrate was detected at 1.1 mg /L which is less than the Federal MCL of 10 mg/L. Turbidity Turbidity was detected at 4.2 NTU which is greater than the Federal MCL of 0.3 NTU. Turbidity has no health effects. However, turbidity can interfere with disinfection and provide a medium for microbial growth. Turbidity may indicate the presence of disease - causing organisms. These organisms include bacteria, viruses, and parasites that can cause symptoms such as nausea, cramps, diarrhea and associated headaches. Aesthetic Related Contaminants Total Alkalinity Total Alkalinity was detected at 13 mg/L as CaCO3. There is no Federal Limit for this contaminant. Total Hardness Total Hardness was detected at 81 mg /L as CaCO3. There is no Federal Limit for this contaminant. Iron - Iron was detected at 1.8 mg/L which is greater than the Federal SMCL of 0.3 mg/L. Iron is regulated as a secondary contaminant. It is associated with rusty color, sediment, metallic taste and reddish or orange staining. Manganese Manganese was detected at 31 ug/L which is less than the Federal SMCL of 50 ug/L. > 2 h � � DrinkWell(TM) Water Testing www.uldrinkwell.com Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Client: Tara Bizily Report #: 151479 Contaminants Detected with Related Health Effects $ Aesthetics Conditions Aesthetic Related Contaminants (continued) Sodium Sodium was detected at 20 mg /L. There is no Federal Limit for this contaminant. Sodium levels in drinking water are usually low and unlikely to be a significant contribution to adverse health effects. The Institute of Medicine of the National Academies of Science recommends 1,500 mg is an adequate sodium intake for adults between the ages of 19 and 50. The recommendation is decreased to 1,300 mg /day for adults between 50 and 70 years and to 1,200 mg /day for adults over 70. In addition, it is recommended that total dietary intake be limited to no more than 2,300 mg /day. Sodium is not a regulated parameter in drinking water, however the U.E. EPA has recommended 20 mg /L as a guideline for those individuals on a very low sodium diet (500 mg /day) and 30 to 60 mg/L as levels where the taste of water may be affected. Iron - Related Bacteria Iron - Related Bacteria was detected at 5000 cfu/ml. There is no Federal Limit for this contaminant. wellcare® Hotline The wellcare® hotline is a free, friendly service that can help anyone with questions about wells or well water private well owners, teachers, students, realtors, developers, building companies, engineers and health department staff. The hotline's helpful specialists will provide answers or referrals - within 24 hours. You can reach the wellcare® hotline by calling 888 -395 -1033. EPA For EPA information on drinking water treatment units and the contaminants they remove, please visit:www.epa.gov/seahome/groundwater/srcttreata.htm. County Health Office Your local county health office may have information regarding private well water treatment including well disinfection for total coliform. Homeowners with a positive result for total coliform are encouraged to contact their county health office for further advice. Contact information may be found in the government section of your phone directory. Water Treatment Professional A water treatment professional in your area may have information regarding private well water treatment. Contact information for water treatment system companies may be found in the yellow pages of your phone directory. 3 I i n DrinkWell(TM) Water Testing www.uldrinkwell.com Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Client: Tara Bizily Report #: 151479 Definitions mg /L 1 mg/L or milligram per liter represents 1 part per million (ppm). An example of a part per million is one cent in $10,000. ug /L 1 ug/L or microgram per liter represents 1 part per billion (ppb). An example.of a part per billion is one cent in $10 million. Action Level The concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other actions which a public water system must take. Aesthetics Contaminant which may affect water quality such as taste, color or odor. Federal Limit Maximum allowable concentration'of a contaminant in a public water supply. This applies to primary and secondary limits. Health Effect The source of any health effect language used in the DrinkWell reports is the Federal Register or other USEPA documents. For more information on health effects in drinking water, please visit www.epa.gov/safewater. Herbicide A chemical compound, usually synthetic, used to control weeds. Industrial Chemical Chemicals used or produced primarily in industrial applications. Inorganic Contaminants (IOC) Mineral -based compounds such as metals and nitrates. These contaminants are naturally occurring in some water, but can also enter water through farming, chemical manufacturing and other human activities. Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) The highest concentration of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are set as close to the Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) as feasible using the best available treatment technology and taking cost into consideration. Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) The concentration of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLGs are non - enforceable health goals. NIA Not Applicable. 4 Client: Tara Bizily Definitions (continued) DrinkWell(TM) Water Testing www.uiddnkwell.com Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Report #: 151479 ND None Detected. The contaminant was not detected above the lowest reportable value by the procedure used for analysis. NTU NTU stands for Nephelometric Turbidity Unit which is the unit used to measure turbidity in water. Turbidity refers to the scattering and absorption of light rather than transmission caused by suspended matter such as Gay, dissolved organic material and microscopic organisms. Organic Contaminants Carbon -based chemicals, such as solvents and pesticides, which can enter drinking water supplies through runoff from cropland, discharges from industrial operations, underground tanks, spills and other sources. Pesticide A synthetic chemical, used to control pests such as insects and other invertebrates such as worms and nematodes. Primary Drinking Water Standards Legally enforceable standards established by the Federal government that apply to public water systems. These standards limit the concentrations of specific contaminants that can adversely affect public health and which are known or anticipated to occur in public water supplies. Radionuclide An unstable form of a chemical element that radioactively decays, resulting in the emission of nuclear radiation. Reporting Limit The lowest concentration at which a contaminant is reported. Secondary Drinking Water Standards Non - enforceable federal guidelines regarding cosmetic effects (such as tooth or skin discoloration) or aesthetic effects (such as taste, odor or color) of drinking water. Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level (SMCL) Non - enforceable federal limits set for contaminants included in the Secondary Drinking Water Standards. The purpose of these limits is to assist public water systems in managing their drinking water for aesthetic considerations. Volatile Organic Contaminant (VOC) Group of organic chemicals characterized by their volatility (ability to evaporate). Volatile organic contaminants are widely used in the manufacture of plastics, clothing and other common household items. �` -,/ 5 Client: Tara Bizily Contaminant Bacteriologicals Total Coliform E. soli DrinkWell(TM) Water Testing 'www.uldrinkwell.com Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Report M 151479 Testing Results Detail Result Absent Absent Reporting Limit Federal Limit Absent Absent Absent Absent Continued on the following page 6 Client: Tara Bizily Contaminant Regulated Metals Arsenic Lead DrinkWell(TM) Water Testing www.uldrinkweii.com Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Report #: 151479 Testing Results Detail Result ND ND Reporting Limit Federal Limit 5 ug/L 5 ug /L 10 ug/L 15 ug/L 7 Continued on the following page Client: Tara Bizily Contaminant Inorganics Nitrate Nitrite Turbidity' DrinkWell(TM) Water Testing www.uldrinkwell.com Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Report M 151479 Testing Results Detail Result Reporting Limit Federal Limit 1.1 mg /L 1 mg/L ND 0.1 mg/L 4.2 NTU 0.1 NTU 10 mg/L 1 mg/L 0.3 NTU • The accuracy of the test results for turbidity may be significantly affected by the elapsed time from sampling to analysis. On -site confirmation of turbidity is recommended before the installation of treatment equipment to correct reported deficiencies of turbidity in the quality of your water. Continued on the following page 8 . J! •v. DrinkWell(TM) Water Testing www.ulddnkwell.com Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Client: Tara Blzily Report #: 151479 Testing Results Detail Contaminant Result Reporting Limit Federal Limit Aesthetics Total Alkalinity 13 mg/L as 10 mg1L as NIA CaCO3 CaCO3 Total Hardness- 81 mg/L as 10 mg/L as NIA CaCO3 CaCO3 Iron 1.8 mg/L 0.1 mg/L 0.3 mg /L Manganese 31 ug/L 5 ug /L 50 ug /L pH— 6.8 N/A 6.5-8.5 Sodium 20 mg/L 0.1 mg/L NIA Iron- Related Bacteria 5000 cfu/ml 100 cfu/mL NIA — The EPA has not established a limit for total hardness but water can be classified as soft (0-75 mg/L CaCO3), moderately hard (75 -150 mg/L CaCO3), hard (150 -300 mg/L CaCO3) and very hard (> 300 mg/L CaCO3). "* The accuracy of the test results for pH may be significantly affected by the elapsed time from sampling to analysis. On -site confirmation of pH is recommended before the installation of treatment equipment to correct reported deficiencies of pH in the quality of your water. �1 Recommendation: Authorize Metropolitan Council to procure and manage Edina Dial a Ride services in 2008. Info/Background: For approximately five years, Senior Community Services (SCS) has operated a dial a ride service for Edina. This service is funded by 1) a performance based funding grant from the Metropolitan Council (MC), 2) the City of Edina general fund and 3) rider fares. The City contracted for the service with SCS and also contracted with MC for the performance based funding. In this regard, the City essentially has served as a conduit of funds and performance obligations between MC and SCS. In September, I advised the Council that MC decided to terminate all of its contractual relationships with SCS. This termination included the Edina program and is effective on December 31, 2007. SCS's obligations will be assumed by an interim transit provider and interruption of service to Edina residents is not expected. MC presently is involved with five dial a ride programs with SCS. Three of the programs are directly administered by MC and two programs, including Edina's, are administered by the host city. Given the fact that Edina's administrative role is to serve as a conduit between MC and the transit provider, it seems to me that a more efficient model should be explored. To that end, I have asked MC to consider contracting directly with the new provider of the Edina service. Edina would then enter into an agreement with MC to provide the local share for the program, but not be involved as a conduit between MC and the transit provider. MC has agreed to this restructuring subject to our consent. (See attached letter.) REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item V. D. From: Gordon Hughes Consent City Manager Information Only Date: 10/31/07 Mgr. Recommends To HRA Subject: Edina Dial a Ride ® To Council Action ® Motion Resolution FI Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: Authorize Metropolitan Council to procure and manage Edina Dial a Ride services in 2008. Info/Background: For approximately five years, Senior Community Services (SCS) has operated a dial a ride service for Edina. This service is funded by 1) a performance based funding grant from the Metropolitan Council (MC), 2) the City of Edina general fund and 3) rider fares. The City contracted for the service with SCS and also contracted with MC for the performance based funding. In this regard, the City essentially has served as a conduit of funds and performance obligations between MC and SCS. In September, I advised the Council that MC decided to terminate all of its contractual relationships with SCS. This termination included the Edina program and is effective on December 31, 2007. SCS's obligations will be assumed by an interim transit provider and interruption of service to Edina residents is not expected. MC presently is involved with five dial a ride programs with SCS. Three of the programs are directly administered by MC and two programs, including Edina's, are administered by the host city. Given the fact that Edina's administrative role is to serve as a conduit between MC and the transit provider, it seems to me that a more efficient model should be explored. To that end, I have asked MC to consider contracting directly with the new provider of the Edina service. Edina would then enter into an agreement with MC to provide the local share for the program, but not be involved as a conduit between MC and the transit provider. MC has agreed to this restructuring subject to our consent. (See attached letter.) I recommend that we request MC to proceed with their procurement process to select and ' directly contract with a new transit provider in 2008. In the meantime, MC has agreed to assist Edina in securing an interim transit provider until the new vendor is selected. Metropolitan Council. v October 26, 2007 City of Edina Attn: Gordon Hughes, City Manager 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Performance -Based Transit Funding - 2008 Senior Community Services PBF Contract Audit Dear Mr. Hughes: As you know, in response to the Metropolitan Council's Senior Community Services PBF Contract Audit, the Council is requesting that certain changes be made to City's contractual arrangements for its dial-a -ride program. The Council is willing to explore all options with the City and is willing to meet and discuss alternate plans. Options include the City continuing to directly contract for the service or the Council' contracting the service under an agreement with the City. The Council intends to continue partially funding the City's dial -a -ride program in 2008 if the transit service is competitively procured, the Council's list of contractor qualifications are incorporated into the procurement and certain contract terms that the Council will prepare are included in the contract. The list of contractor qualifications is currently being developed by the Council's internal audit staff and the contract terms that need to be included in the contract are being prepared by the Council's legal department. The Council recognizes that there will be a gap between the end of the current contract and when the dial -a -ride service can be competitively procured. The Council will work with the City to assure service coverage between January 1, 2008 and the implementation of a competitively procured transit service. Please call Gerri Sutton (651- 602 -1672) at you earliest convenience so that we can work out the details on an acceptable course of action. Thomas H. Weaver Regional Administrator cc: Gerri Sutton, Asst. Dir. Contracted Services, MTS www.metrocouncil.org 390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 55101 -1805 • (651) 602 -1000 • Fax (651) 602 -1550 • TTY (651) 291 -0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer /1NA,.j'� Ok \ro aui REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL Agenda Item NO. V.E. From: CHERYL ENGELMAN Consent CITY SANITARIAN' Information Only ❑ Date: NOVEMBER 5, 2007 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: PUBLIC HEALTH AND ® Motion ENVIRONMENTAL ❑ Resolution HEALTH MUTUAL AID ❑ Ordinance AGREEMENT ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Public Health and Environmental Health Mutual Aid Agreement. INFORMATION/BACKGROUND: In 2006, Edina entered into a "Public Health Mutual Aid Agreement ", developed by Community Health Boards ii the Twin Cities metropolitan area, specifically the cities of Bloomington, Edina, Richfield and Mimneapolis, and Anoka, Carver, Dakota, Hennepin, Ramsey, Scott and Washington counties. Considering their close proximity, these agencies recognized that it was in their best interest to assist one another in the event of an emergency. The purpose of the agreement is to strengthen the preparedness of Minnesota's public health system by making personnel, equipment and other resources available to a political subdivision in the event of an emergency, training, drill or exercise. Recently, a new provision was added to the Agreement allowing additional metro health agencies to participate. The Agreement was also renamed "Public Health and Environmental Health Mutual Aid Agreement ". Possible new participants include the Cities of .Brooklyn Park, Crystal, Hopkins, Maplewood, Minnetonka, St. Louis Park, St. Paul and Wayzata. Once signed, the new agreement will be in effect until December 31, 2011. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the agreement. HC Agreement # Twin Cities Public Health and Environmental•Health Entities in Minnesota MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 471.59, political subdivisions of the State of Minnesota may jointly and cooperatively exercise powers common to each of the contracting parties; and WHEREAS, the original participating parties set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated by this reference, executed the Twin Cities Public Health Departments in Minnesota PUBLIC HEALTH MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT on or about February, 2007; and WHEREAS, the parties agree that, in order to make changes to that agreement and in lieu of an amendment, the parties, and any potential parties, including but not limited to those possible additional parties set forth on Exhibit A or as otherwise provided, shall execute this Twin Cities Public Health and Municipal Environmental Health Entities in Minnesota MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT; and WHEREAS, the purpose of this agreement is. to strengthen the preparedness of the public health and environmental health system in Minnesota; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to simplify the defense of claims by eliminating conflicts among defendants that are parties to this Agreement; and WHEREAS, emergencies may occur in the future which will require local public health and/or environmental health entities to come to the aid and assistance of other local public health or environmental health entities; and WHEREAS, the intent of this agreement is to make personnel, equipment, and other resources available to political subdivisions in the event of an emergency, training, drill or exercise; and WHEREAS, the parties participating in this Agreement have determined that it is in their best interests to assist one another in the event of an emergency, training, drill or exercise. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the participating parties agree as follows: 1. PURPOSE It is recognized and acknowledged that in certain situations, including but not limited to, natural disasters, public health emergencies, technological hazards, man-made disasters, civil emergencies, community disorders, insurgency or enemy attack, disease outbreaks, special events, or trainings, drills or exercises in preparation for any of these eventualities, the use of the personnel, equipment, supplies and/or services of a local public health entity to perform functions outside its jurisdictional limits is desirable and Twin Cities Public Health & Environmental Health Mutual Aid Agreement final for signature 10 -31 -07 necessary to preserve and protect the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the State of Minnesota. This Agreement only addresses assistance provided by a participating party in response to a request made by a participating party and does not affect the applicability of Minn. Stat. § 12.331, Minn. Stat. § 12.3 3, or other pertinent laws to other activities that may be undertaken by a political subdivision. II. DEFINITIONS For the purposes of this mutual aid agreement, the following terms shall be defined as follows: A. "Employee" means those personnel currently working for a party including, elected and appointed officials, officers and volunteers who are registered with and under the direction and control of that party as required by Minn. Stat. § 12.22, subd. 2a (a) (2005). B. "Participating Party" means the local public health or environmental health authority of a political subdivision that is a party to this Agreement. C. "Requesting Official" means the person designated by a Participating Party who is responsible for requesting Assistance from the other Participating Parties. D. "Requesting Party" means a Participating Party that requests assistance from other Participating Parties. E. "Responding Official" means the person designated by a Participating Party who is responsible to determine whether and to what extent that Participating Party should provide assistance to a Requesting Party. F. "Responding Party" means a Participating Party that provides assistance to a Requesting Party. G. "Assistance" means Public Health or Environmental Health personnel, equipment, supplies and/or services. III. PROVISION OF MUTUAL AID A. Request for Assistance. Whenever, in the opinion of a Requesting Official, there is a need for assistance from other parties, the Requesting Official may call upon the Responding Official of any other party to furnish assistance. The Requesting Party, within a reasonable period of time, shall provide the Responding Party /ies with a written confirmation of the need for assistance including details regarding requested resources, timelines /schedules and location(s) for assistance. Twin Cities Public Health & Environmental Health Mutual Aid Agreement final for signature 10 -31 -07 B. Response to Request. Upon the request for assistance from a Requesting Party, the Responding Official may authorize and direct his/her party's personnel to provide assistance to the Requesting Party. This decision will be made after considering the needs of the Responding Party and the availability of resources. Once assistance has been authorized, the Responding Party, within a reasonable period of time, shall provide the Requesting Party with a written confirmation of assistance including details regarding the personnel and resources to be provided and when they will be available. C. Recall and Release of Assistance. The Responding Official may at any time recall such assistance when in his or her best judgment or by an order from the governing body of the Responding Party or its designee, it is considered to be in the best interest of the Responding Party to do so. The Requesting Party may at any time release a Responding Party or an individual from providing any further assistance. D. Command of Scene. The Requesting Party shall be in command of the mutual aid scene. The personnel and equipment of the Responding Party shall be under the direction and control of the Requesting Party until the Responding Official withdraws assistance. E. State Declared Emer eg ncy. If the State of Minnesota or an authorized state agency declares an emergency, the statutes and administrative rules pertaining to state declared emergencies shall prevail where they conflict with the provisions of this Agreement. IV. LIABILITY A. Each Requesting Party shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless a Responding Party for claims arising within the Requesting Party's jurisdiction subject to the limits of liability under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 and other applicable law, rule, and regulation, including common law. The purpose of creating this duty to defend, indemnify and hold harmless, is to simplify the defense of claims by eliminating conflicts among defendants that are parties to this Agreement. B. For purposes of the Minnesota Municipal Tort Liability Act (Minn. Stat. Ch. 466), the employees and officers of the Responding Party are deemed to be employees (as defined in Minn. Stat. § 466.01, subdivision 6) of the Requesting Party, but only for purposes of addressing liability under this Agreement. The employees of the Responding Party shall not be considered employees of the Requesting Party for any other purpose. C. The Requesting Party shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the Responding Party, its Employees, officers and elected and appointed officials against any and all claims brought or actions filed against the Responding Party, its Employees, officers and elected and appointed officials for injury to, death of, or damage to Twin Cities Public Health & Environmental Health Mutual Aid Agreement final for signature 10 -31 -07 the property of any third person or persons, arising from the performance and provision of assistance in responding to a request for assistance by the Requesting Party pursuant to this Agreement. Under no circumstances, however, shall a party be required to pay on behalf of itself and other parties, any amounts in excess of the limits on liability established in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 applicable to any one party. The statutory limits of liability for some or all of the parties may not be added together or stacked to increase the maximum amount of liability for any party. D. Each Participating Party agrees to promptly notify the other Participating Parties if it knows or becomes aware of any facts or allegations reasonably giving rise to actual or potential liability, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs or expenses, including attorney's fees, involving or reasonably likely to involve the other Participating Parties, and arising out of acts or omissions related to this Agreement. E. No party to this. Agreement or any officer of any party shall be liable to any other party or to any other person for failure of any party to furnish assistance to any other party, or for recalling or releasing assistance as described in this Agreement. F. If a Participating Party utilizes contractors or agents to provide services or assistance under this Agreement, the Participating Party shall execute a contract with the contractor and agent including the following language. Failure to include the following language shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement: CONTRACTOR shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless each Participating Party in the Twin Cities Public Health and Municipal Environmental Health Entities in Minnesota Mutual Aid Agreement, its officials, officers, agents, volunteers and employees from any liability, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs, or expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or omission of the CONTRACTOR, a subcontractor, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, and/or anyone for whose acts and/or omissions they may be liable in the performance of the services required by this Contract, and against all loss by reason of the failure of the CONTRACTOR to perform fully, in any respect, all obligations under this contract. In order to protect the CONTRACTOR and those listed above under the indemnification provision, the CONTRACTOR agrees at all times during the term of this Contract, and beyond such term when so required, to have and keep in force the following insurance coverages, in amounts equal at least to the municipal tort liability limits of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466 or other applicable law as currently in effect or as may be amended Twin Cities Public Health & Environmental Health Mutual Aid Agreement final for signature 10 -31 -07 from time to time, unless specific dollar limits are otherwise provided herein: Limits (1) Commercial General Liability on an occurrence basis with contractual liability coverage: General Aggregate (The full limits of coverage must be dedicated to apply to this project, per ISO form CG2501, or equivalent.) Products -- Completed Operations Aggregate Personal and Advertising Injury Each Occurrence— Combined Bodily Injury and Property Damage (2) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: Workers' Compensation If the CONTRACTOR is based outside the State of Minnesota, coverage must apply to Minnesota law. Employer's Liability. Bodily injury by: Accident—Each Accident Disease — Policy Limit Disease —Each Employee (3) Professional Liability —Per Claim and Aggregate The professional liability insurance must be maintained continuously for a period of two years after the termination of this Agreement. An umbrella or excess policy over primary liability insurance coverages is an acceptable method to provide the required insurance limits. The above establishes minimum insurance requirements. It is the sole responsibility of the CONTRACTOR to determine the need for and to procure additional insurance which may be needed in connection with this contract. Copies of insurance policies shall be promptly submitted to (name of jurisdiction) upon written request. The CONTRACTOR shall not commence work until it has obtained required insurance. The.certificate(s) shall name (name of jurisdiction) as Twin Cities Public Health & Environmental Health Mutual Aid Agreement final for signature 10 -31 -07 the certificate holder and as an additional insured for the liability coverage(s) with respect to operations covered under the Contract. The CONTRACTOR shall furnish to (name of jurisdiction) updated certificates during the term of this Contract as insurance policies expire. If the CONTRACTOR fails to furnish proof of insurance coverages, (name of jurisdiction) may withhold payments and/or pursue any other right or remedy allowed under the contract, law, equity, and/or statute. (Name of jurisdiction) does not waive any rights or assume any obligations by not strictly enforcing the requirements set forth in this section. Duty to Notify. The CONTRACTOR shall promptly notify (name of jurisdiction) of any claim, action, cause of action or litigation brought against CONTRACTOR, its employees, officers, agents or subcontractors, which arises out of the services contained in this Contract. The CONTRACTOR shall also notify (name of jurisdiction) whenever CONTRACTOR has a reasonable basis for believing that CONTRACTOR and/or its employees, officers, agents or subcontractors, and/or (name of jurisdiction) might become the subject of a claim, action, cause of action, criminal arrest, criminal charge or litigation arising out of and/or related to the services contained in this Contract. Failure to provide the notices required by this section is a material violation of the terms and conditions of this Contract. V. WORKER'S COMPENSATION Each party shall be responsible for injuries or death of its own Employees "to the extent required by law ". Each party will maintain worker's compensation insurance or self - insurance coverage, covering its own Employees while they are providing assistance pursuant to this Agreement. Each party waives the right to sue any other party for any worker's compensation benefits paid to its own Employee or their dependents, even if the injuries were caused wholly or partially be the negligence of any other party or employees. VI. DAMAGE TO EQUIPMENT Each Participating Party, to the extent a party is at fault, shall be responsible for damages to or loss of its equipment while acting within the scope of this Agreement. VII. CHARGES TO THE REQUESTING PARTY A. No charges will be levied by a Responding Party to this Agreement for assistance rendered to a Requesting Party under the terms of this Agreement unless that assistance continues for a period of more than eight (8) hours, as measured from the time Responding Party begins to provide assistance after being specifically directed by the Requesting Party to perform a task or tasks, unless the Requesting Twin Cities Public Health & Environmental Health Mutual Aid Agreement final for signature 10 -31 -07 Parry is eligible to obtain reimbursement for expenses it incurred during this period from the United States, the State of Minnesota, or any other source. In that event the Requesting Party shall take all steps necessary to seek reimbursement to the Responding Party for the actual cost of any assistance provided during this initial eight (8) hour period including salaries, overtime, materials and supplies, and other necessary expenses. B. If assistance provided under this Agreement continues for more than eight (8) hours, the Responding Party may submit to the Requesting Party an itemized bill for the actual cost of any assistance provided after the initial eight (8) hour period, including salaries, overtime, materials and supplies and other necessary expenses; and the Requesting Party shall reimburse the party providing the assistance for that amount. C. The ability to levy such charges is not contingent upon the availability of federal or state government funds to reimburse the charges. VIII. DURATION This Agreement will commence upon execution by all eleven (11) original Participating Parties and shall terminate December 31, 2011, unless terminated sooner pursuant to section XI herein. This Agreement will only apply to those parties who have lawfully executed the document and returned a copy to: Hennepin County Public Health Emergency Preparedness Attention: Emergency Preparedness Unit Supervisor 1011 First Street South Suite 215 Hopkins MN 55343 (612)543-5220 IX. MERGER AND MODIFICATION A. It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement between the parties is contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Pursuant to the terms of the TWIN CITIES PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENTS IN MINNESOTA PUBLIC HEALTH MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT, the original participating parties hereby give notice that said PUBLIC HEALTH MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT is terminated and shall be replaced in entirety by this Agreement. All items referred to in this Agreement are incorporated or attached and are deemed to be part of this Agreement. The matters set forth in the Twin Cities Public Health & Environmental Health Mutual Aid Agreement final for signature 10 -31 -07 "WHEREAS" clauses at the beginning of this Agreement are by this reference incorporated into and made a part of this Agreement. B. Any alterations, variations, modifications, or waivers of provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to this Agreement signed by the parties hereto. X. COMMAND AND CONTROL The Requesting Party shall command the mutual aid scene and provide direction to Employees of each Responding Party. A party shall not be considered to be either a temporary or permanent employee of the other parties except as specifically described in this Agreement. XI. DEFAULT AND WITHDRAWAL A. If a party fails to perform any of the provisions of this Agreement or so fails to administer the work as to endanger the performance of the Agreement, this shall constitute a default. Unless the party's default is excused by the other parties, the non - defaulting parties may by majority, vote to remove the defaulting party by providing written notice of termination of the Agreement as to the defaulting party only. Any such removal or termination of this Agreement shall become effective upon the sending of such notice and will not cancel any obligations incurred by any party prior to such termination. B. Any party may withdraw from this Agreement with or without cause by providing thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the other parties herein. Withdrawal shall not discharge any liability incurred by any Party prior to withdrawal. Such liability shall continue until discharged by law or agreement. C. The terms of Sections II, III, IV, V, VI, X, XII, and XIII shall survive the expiration, termination or withdrawal from this Agreement. XII. RECORDS — AVAILABILITY /ACCESS To the extent required by Minnesota Statutes Section 16C.05, Subd. 5 (as may be amended), the parties agree that the any party, the State Auditor, the Legislative Auditor or any of their duly authorized representatives, at any time during normal business hours, and as often as they may reasonably deem necessary, shall have access to and the right to examine, audit, excerpt, and transcribe any books, documents, papers, records, etc., which are pertinent to the accounting practices and procedures of the other parties and involve transactions relating to this Agreement. Such materials shall be maintained and such access and rights shall be in force and effect during the period of the Agreement and for six (6) years after its termination or cancellation. XIII. DATA PRIVACY. Twin Cities Public Health & Environmental Health Mutual Aid Agreement final for signature 10 -31 -07 Each party, its employees, agents, owners, partners, and subcontractors agree to abide by the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and implementing regulations, if applicable, and all other applicable state and federal laws, rules, regulations and orders relating to data privacy or confidentiality, and as any of the same may be amended. Each Party agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other parties, their elected and appointed officials, officers, agents, employees, and volunteers from any claims resulting from a party's officers', agents', owners', partners', employees', volunteers', assignees' or subcontractors' unlawful disclosure and/or use of such protected data. The terms of this paragraph shall survive the cancellation or termination of this Agreement. XIV. COMPLIANCE Participating Parties shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local statutes, regulations, rules and ordinances in force or hereafter enacted. XV. EXECUTION Each party hereto has read, agreed to and executed this Mutual Aid Agreement on the date indicated. XVI. ADDITIONAL PARTIES AND COUNTERPARTS A government unit, on behalf of its local public health and/or environmental health entity, may join this mutual aid Agreement and thereby become a Participating Party upon approval of the new government unit by a majority of the Participating Parties, through their governing body or their duly authorized designee, and execution of a copy of this Mutual Aid Agreement by the joining governing body. This Mutual Aid Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each counterpart for all purposes being deemed an original and all such counterparts shall together constitute one and the same. agreement. XVII. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION In order to coordinate the services so as to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement, each Participating Party's Director of Public Health, Director of Environmental Health, or equivalent counterpart, shall be the contact person for each Participating Party. under this Agreement. A Participating Party may designate someone other than the Director of Health, Director of Environmental Health, or equivalent, as the contact person by providing written notice to all other Participating Parties. Twin Cities Public Health & Environmental Health Mutual Aid Agreement final for signature 10 -31 -07 A SIGNATURE PAGE FOR EACH PARTY SHALL BE ATTACHED Twin Cities Public Health & Environmental Health Mutual Aid Agreement final for signature 10 -31 -07 10 The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners having duly approved this Agreement on the day of , 200_, and pursuant to such approval, the proper County officials having signed this Agreement, the parties hereto agree to be bound by the provisions herein set forth. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN By: Assistant/Deputy /County Administrator Date: By: Chair of its County Board Date: ATTEST: By: Deputy /Clerk of the County Board Date: Reviewed by the County Attorney's Office By: Date: Twin Cities Public Health & Environmental Health Mutual Aid Agreement final for signature 10 -31 -07 11 CITY or COUNTY OF By: Title of Official Date: By: Title of Official Date: Reviewed and approved by the City or County Attorney. By: Title Date: Twin Cities Public Health & Environmental Health Mutual Aid Agreement final for signature 10 -31 -07 12 Exhibit A Participating Parties to the Agreement: 1) Original signers to the Twin Cities Public Health Mutual Aid Agreement: Community Health Boards in the Twin Cities 7- County metro area. Anoka County City of Bloomington Carver County Dakota County City of Edina Hennepin County City of Minneapolis Ramsey County City of Richfield Scott County Washington County 2) Possible additional signers as of October 2007: other governmental units as defined by applicable statute including but not limited to political subdivisions, municipalities or other governmental units with environmental health or public health services or resources. City of Brooklyn Park City of Crystal City of Hopkins City of Maplewood City of Minnetonka City of St. Louis Park City of St. Paul City of Wayzata University of Minnesota Twin Cities Public Health & Environmental Health Mutual Aid Agreement final for signature 10 -31 -07 13 o e tt v �1 To: Mayor & City Council From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: November 2, 2007 Subject: Resolution Receiving Donations Recommendation: Adopt Resolution. REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item V.F. Consent ❑ Information Only Mgr. Recommends To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion F] Resolution Ordinance F] Discussion Info/Background: In order to comply with State Statutes all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. RESOLUTION NO. 2007-120 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Donations to Edina Park Department: Arden Park Beautification $100 Committee Donations to Edina Art Center: Terrie Rose $60 Nancy Rock $200 Sarah Rahn $150 Donation to the Braemar Memorial Fund for future Golf Course equipment purchases: William Bale $25 Marlyn Friede $50 Gerhard Brahms $50 Daniel Moran $100 D.P. Brunsvold $50 Thomas Spicola $50 M. M. Carpenter $50 Arthur Young $25 John Feddema $100 L.P. Youngblood $50 Patrick Finley $25 Dated: November 5, 2007 A Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK 1, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of November 5, 2007 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of . 20_. City Clerk REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item V.G. From: Debra Mangen Consent VN City Clerk Information Only F1 Date: November 5, 2007 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ®To Council Subject: 2008 Council Meeting Dates Holidays Action ® Motion and ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: Motion approving the 2008 Council meeting dates and holiday schedule per the attached list. Info/Background: Annually the Council confirms the Council meeting dates. Also, Edina's Code of Ordinances Section 150 establishes which holidays are observed. The attached list will be distributed to staff and the public to advise all of these dates. PLEASE ROUTE THROUGH YOUR DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: November 6, 2007 TO: Mayor and Council FROM: Debra Mangen, City Clerk SUBJECT: 2008 COUNCIL MEETING DATES AND HOLIDAYS At its meeting of November 5, 2007 the City Council approved continuation of the current City Council regular meeting schedule of first and third Tuesdays and study session on the fourth Tuesdays for 2008 with the following exceptions. Wednesday, January 2, 2008 First Tuesday is a holiday, City Offices are closed Monday, February 4, 20008 First Tuesday is when political parties have determined to hold caucuses. MS 202A.19 does not allow City Councils to meet after 6:00 p.m. on Caucus Day Monday, March 5, 2008 First Tuesday in March reserved for political caucuses per MS 202A Monday, August 4, 2008 First Tuesday is National Night Out Monday, November 3, 2008 First Tuesday is General Election Day - no public meetings allowed by law The Personnel Ordinance No. 150 established the following HOLIDAYS FOR 0111i:3 NEW YEAR'S DAY TUESDAY JANUARY 1 MARTIN LUTHER KING DAY MONDAY JANUARY 21 PRESIDENTS' DAY MONDAY FEBRUARY 18 MEMORIAL DAY MONDAY MAY 23 INDEPENDENCE DAY FRIDAY JULY 4 LABOR DAY MONDAY SEPTEMBER 1 VETERAN'S DAY TUESDAY NOVEMBER 11 THANKSGIVING DAY THURSDAY NOVEMBER 27 DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING FRIDAY NOVEMBER 22 CHRISTMAS EVE 1/2 DAY WEDNESDAY DECEMBER 24 CHRISTMAS DAY THURSDAY DECEMBER 25 NEW YEARS EVE 1/z DAY WEDNESDAY DECEMBER 31 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION. To: Mayor & City Council From: Wayne D. Houle, PE I, City Engineer ' Date: November 5, 2007 Subject: Set Public Hearing Date and Receive Feasibility Report for Country Club Area Sewer, Water, and Street Reconstruction Improvement Nos. A -213 & A -214 Recommendation: Agenda Item # V. H. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ® Resolution El Ordinance ❑ Discussion Approve resolution calling for Public Hearing on December 4, 2007 for Country Club Area (Improvement Nos. A -213 and A -214) Sewer, Water, and Street Reconstruction Improvements. Info /Background: City staff is requesting these utility and street improvements based on the condition of the utilities and the necessary street improvements required throughout the neighborhood. Staff has reviewed this project and has determined it is feasible. Staff and Consultant will be reviewing the Feasibility Study with the Heritage Preservation Board on Tuesday, November 13; with the neighborhood on Wednesday, November 14; and with the Transportation Commission on Thursday, November 15. The Feasibility Study will then be submitted to the City Council. Staff suggests scheduling a Public Hearing for December 4, 2007. G:\ Engineering \lmprovements\A213 A214 Edina Country Club Stage 1 & 2\2007 Feasibility Study\ADMIN \MISC\20071105 A213 A214 RR—Request for PH.doc R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/17/2007 8:11:06 Council Check Register Page - 1 10/18/2007 -- 10/18/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 302505 10118/2007 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 106.68 171769 702140 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 52.60 171770 609783 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 70.12 171771 609785 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 28.60 172148 702209 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 74.12 172149 609787 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 332.12 302506 10/18/2007 101441 ADECCO EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 630.00 UB TEMP 171994 63616576 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 630.00 302507 10/18/2007 102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES 1,450.70 READY MIX 00005917 171817 4205095 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 1,450.70 302508 10/1812007 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY 138.31 COFFEE 171866 125656 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 138.31 302509 1011812007 120904 ALCORN BEVERAGE CO INC. 954.00 172150 510149 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 954.00 302510 10/18/2007 100058 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 33,958.00 RECYCLING 171995 0894001083412 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES RECYCLING 33,958.00 302511 10118/2007 100356 AMERICAN BUILDING CONTRACTORS 111.40 PERMIT REFUND 171996 ED084729 1495.4111 BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 111.40 302512 10118/2007 102575 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIAT 20.00 APWA CEU 171997 101007 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL 20.00 302513 10118/2007 101115 AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SER 237.65 171867 46 -9/07 1551.6201 LAUNDRY CITY HALL GENERAL 102.06 171868 35320 -9/07 5841.6201 LAUNDRY YORK OCCUPANCY 117.72 171869 35314 -9/07 5861.6201 LAUNDRY VERNON OCCUPANCY 53.86 171870 35334 -9/07 5821.6201 LAUNDRY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 438.35 171871 59056 -9/07 1470.6201 LAUNDRY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10117/2007 8:11:06 Council Check Register Page - 2 10/18/2007 -- 10/1812007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 157.47 172051 16813 -9/07 5421.6201 LAUNDRY GRILL 1,107.11 302514 10/18/2007 102172 APPERrS FOODSERVICE 429.87 FOOD 172052 836574 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 429.87 302515 10118/2007 121576 APPLE IRRIGATION LLC 491.57 SPRINKLER -4704 UPPER TERRACE OOREPAIR 171998 336 05462.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -462 WOODHILL 491.57 302516 10/1812007 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 173.20 POOL LIFT PARTS 00002199 172053 31286 5620.6530 REPAIR PARTS EDINBOROUGH PARK 187.50 POOL HEATER REPAIR 172054 31249 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 360.70 302517 10/18/2007 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 33.95 171999 100107 5821.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 40.27 171999 100107 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 46.93 171999 100107 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 54.63 171999 100107 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 74.03 171999 100107 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 74.22 171999 100107 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 88.81 171999 100107 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 92.47 171999 100107 1481.6162 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 138.22 171999 100107 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 191.37 171999 100107 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 213.02 COMPLEX 171999 100107 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 215.01 171999 100107 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 244.72 171999 100107 • 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 260.55 171999 100107 5311.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL POOL OPERATION 302.24 ROSLAND PARK 171999 100107 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 304.07 171999 100107 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 304.08 171999 100107 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 407.07 171999 100107 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 472.54 171999 100107 5620.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 3,558.20 302518 10/18/2007 100256 AT&T MOBILITY 48.60 172055 X10042007 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 48.60 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10117/2007 8:11:06 Council Check Register Page - 3 10/18/2007 -- 1011812007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 302519 10/18/2007 119867 ATOMIC ARCHITECTURAL SHEET MET 9,498.70 GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION 172056 8 FINAL 4401.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR 9,498.70 302520 10/18/2007 103708 AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS CO. 682.75 PLC CHANGES 00005848 171818 19487S 5915.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS WATER TREATMENT 682.75 302521 10/18/2007'- 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 242.76 BATTERIES 00001015 171819 18- 188458 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 21.28 BATTERIES 00003865 171873 18- 186138 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 264.04 302522 10/18/2007 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 2,121.40 171772 42355200 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 129.73 171773 43536900 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 175.73 171774 43539800 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 356.50 171775 42355300 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 40.95 171776 43522700 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 45.10 171930 42418300 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 462.40 171931 42412000 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 384.20 171932 42412900 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 198.47 172151 43563600 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 123.95 172152 5588700 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 70.11 172153 43569500 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 104.20 172154 42439500 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,212.74 302523 10/1812007 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 38.05 BADGE HOLDERS, LABELS 171820 W0471472 -1 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION 149.15 LIGHT BULBS 00009227 171874 OE- 132452 -1 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 109.07 COMP PLAN SUPPLIES 172000 0E- 122807 -1 1140.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANNING 22.07- 172001 CO-OE-127181-1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 22.07 172002 OE- 128526 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 296.27 302524 10/18/2007 101691 BETZEN GOLF SUPPLY CO. 210.26 GRIPS 172057 22679 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 262.28 MERCHANDISE 172058 22680 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 472.54 302525 10/18/2007 115305 BLENKER, DEAN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/18/2007 -10/18/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 170.90 UNIFORM PURCHASE 172003 101107 1301.6201 LAUNDRY REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10117/2007 8:11:06 Page- 4 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT BRAEMAR PARK SHELTER CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PROFESSIONALSERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 170.90 302526 10/18/2007 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 526.84 MUFFLER, CLAMP 00001041 171821 129798 1553.6530 115.97 SWITCH ASSEMBLY 00005725 172128 123288 1553.6530 642.81 302527 10/18/2007 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 185.75 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 172059 284865 47052.6710 185.75 302528 10118/2007 105651 BREEZY POINT RESORT 525.00 9/19107 CARLSON 916 -919 00403132 172129 399382 1400.6104 525.00 302529 10/18/2007 101489 BROOKS, DARLENE 703.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 172060 101107 5110.6103 703.00 302530 10/18/2007 120439 CADY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 95.85 FLOOR BURNISHING 171875 15793A 5841.6162 95.85 302531 10/1812007 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 909.48 GOLF BALLS 172061 913602615 5440.5511 396.00- CREDIT 172062 913687941 5440.5511 396.00- CREDIT 172063 913764450 5440.5511 117.48 302532 10/1812007 120935 CAMPBELL KNUTSON 5,009.91 LEGAL - ACCT# 2851G 171822 093007 1195.6131 5,009.91 302533 10/18/2007 121583 CANEPA, AIMEE 112.50 UNIFORM PURCHASE 172130 101507 1400.6203 112.50 302534 10/18/2007 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 11.60 171933 68776 5822.5515 538.40 171934 68777 5822.5514 2,571.80 171935 18759 5842.5514 REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS 10117/2007 8:11:06 Page- 4 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT BRAEMAR PARK SHELTER CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION SERVICES CUSTODIANS YORK OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES PROFESSIONALSERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/17/2007 8:11:06 Council Check Register Page - 5 10/18/2007 - 10/18/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3,121.80 302535 10/1812007 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 236.00 172155 49181 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 236.00 5,270.22 302536 10/18/2007 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 100307 5511.6186 10.12 171876 100307 5821.6186 HEAT 17.68 171876 100307 5841.6186 HEAT 23.60 171876 100307 5861.6186 HEAT 28.96 171876 100307 5430.6186 HEAT 38.22 171876 100307 5422.6186 HEAT 53.25 171876 100307 5210.6186 HEAT 66.91 171876 100307 5911.6186 HEAT 69.45 171876 100307 5630.6186 HEAT 73.39 171876 100307 1481.6186 HEAT 83.67 171876 100307 1552.6186 HEAT 94.21 171876 100307 5420.6186 HEAT 320.60 171876 100307 5111.6186 HEAT 577.31 171876 100307 1628.6186 HEAT 655.28 171876 100307 1646.6186 HEAT 69081 171876 100307 5913 6186 HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY RICHARDS GOLF COURSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GOLF DOME PROGRAM PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER CENTENNIAL LAKES YORK FIRE STATION CENT SVC PW BUILDING CLUB HOUSE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT SENIOR CITIZENS BUILDING MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS EDINBOROUGH PARK POOL OPERATION CENT SVC PW BUILDING ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT BLOOMINGTONBR #2 BALANCE SHEET 5,270.22 171876 100307 5511.6186 8,073.68 302537 10118/2007 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES IN 845.70 172131 1518612 5620.6186 44.46 172132 1518642 5311.6186 - 196.09 172133 1518632 1552.6186 1,086.25 302538 10/18/2007 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 2,220.94 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES 00008023 172004 514236 5511.6406 2,220.94 302539 - 10/18/2007 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 630.00 171936 348762 5842.5514 630.00 302540 10/18/2007 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 13,791.26 SPECIAL ASSESS -MN DRIVE 172064 39362 3066.1234 13,791.26 HEAT HEAT HEAT HEAT GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY RICHARDS GOLF COURSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GOLF DOME PROGRAM PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER CENTENNIAL LAKES YORK FIRE STATION CENT SVC PW BUILDING CLUB HOUSE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT SENIOR CITIZENS BUILDING MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS EDINBOROUGH PARK POOL OPERATION CENT SVC PW BUILDING ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT BLOOMINGTONBR #2 BALANCE SHEET R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/1712007 8:11:06 Council Check Register Page - 6 10/18/2007 -10/18/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 302541 10/18/2007 100685 CITY OF EDEN PRAIRIE 100.00 PERFORMANCE 10/30/07 171816 100107 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 100.00 302542 10118/2007 118766 CITY OF MAPLE GROVE 100.00 PLEAA TRAINING 172134 101507 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 302543 10/18/2007 100687 CITY OF RICHFIELD 709.74 XCEL BILLING 171823 3442 5932.6185 LIGHT & POWER GENERAL STORM SEWER 709.74 302544 10118/2007 105693 CITYSPRINT 18.31 COURIER 171824 8083 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADMINISTRATION 147.78 COURIER 171824 8083 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 166.09 302545 10/18/2007 100688 CITYWIDE WINDOW SERVICES INC 14.38 WINDOW CLEANING 171825 408488 5861.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS VERNON OCCUPANCY 16.62 WINDOW CLEANING 171825 408488 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 27.04 WINDOW CLEANING 171825 406488 5841.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS YORK OCCUPANCY 58.04 302546 10/18/2007 116304 CLAY, DON 117.50 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 172065 101107 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 117.50 302547 10/18/2007 121113 COLUMBIA WEATHER SYSTEMS INC. 143.00 BRACKETS FOR R -91 00003518 171877 4538 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 143.00 302548 10/1812007 120826 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT 234.33 TV ADVERTISING 171826 322977,78,79,80 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 234.33 TV ADVERTISING 171826 322977,78,79,80 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 234.34 TV ADVERTISING 171826 322977,78,79,80 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 703.00 302549 10/1812007 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 42.89 SAFETY GLASSES 00001124 172005 03150372 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 42.89 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/17/2007 8:11:06 Council Check Register Page - 7 10/18/2007 -- 10/18/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 302550 1011812007 120562 COOL RUNNING LAWN AND SNOW 745.50 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00001705 172006 214 05462.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -462 WOODHILL 639.00 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00001608 172007 216 05462.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM-462 WOODHILL 532.50 SPRINKLER REPAIR 00001678 172008 217 05462.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WMA62 WOODHILL 1,917.00 302551 10/1812007 103800 CORPORATE EXPRESS INC. 266.15 OFFICE SUPPLIES 171878 81989899 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 266.15 302552 10/18/2007 120538 CREATIVE GRAPHICS 82.68 JUNIOR TICKETS 00006339 172066 00039996 5410.6575 PRINTING GOLF ADMINISTRATION 82.68 302553 10118/2007 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 106.78 114- 09855685 -4 172067 880894 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 106.78 302554 10118/2007 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 1,038.00 171777 428672 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,645.30 171937 429646 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,025.22 171938 429644 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 48.40 171939 429645 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 410.00 171940 429313 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 19.80 171941 429647 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,394.00 172156 429314 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,553.90 172157 429642 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 78.60 172158 429643 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 8,213.22 302555 10/18/2007 102455 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC 393.52 REMOTE STARTER 00003517 171879 1- 052399 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 56.43 FLOOR MAT 00001147 172009 4- 106903 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 129.12 MIRRORS 00001157 172010 4- 106845 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 579.07 302556 10/1812007 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 74.70 BAKERY 172068 257458 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 35.03 BAKERY 172069 257515 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 14.86 BAKERY 172070 257756 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 24.30 BAKERY 172071 257926 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 148.89 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/18/2007 -- 10/18/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 302557 10118/2007 111120 DESIGN N PRINT 213.19 INSPECTION FORMS 171827 33518 1490.6575 PRINTING 55.08 PARTY FLYERS 172072 33627 5610.6575 PRINTING 268.27 302558 10/18/2007 101766 DISPLAY SALES 119.28 FLAGS 00008021 171880 INV0055168 5511.6406 5620.5510 5911.6180 5862.5513 5862.5515 5822.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 05474.1705.30 04339.1705.30 GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD CONTRACTED REPAIRS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 119.28 ADVERTISING OTHER 5310.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 302559 10/18/2007 121439 E GROUP INC. 850.41 T- SHIRTS 172073 5119484 650.41 302560 10/1812007 100737 E. H. RENNER & SONS 6,488.20 EMERGENCY WELL REPAIR 00005855 172074 90860000 6,488.20 302561 10/18/2007 100739 EAGLE WINE 3,529.54 171942 668464 33.50 171943 668465 649.25 171944 668467 2,390.97 172159 668471 83.19 172160 668941 11.29- 172161 734127 6,675.16 302562 1011812007 121577 EBI DRILLING INC. 41,174.90 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 172011 101907 165,915.03 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 172011 101907 207,089.93 302563 10/18/2007 101923 EDINA ATHLETIC BOOSTERS 130.00 EDINA SPORTS AD 172135 2008AD 130.00 EDINA SPORTS AD 172135 2008AD 130.00 EDINA SPORTS AD 172135 2008AD 260.00 EDINA SPORTS AD 172135 2008AD 650.00 302564 10118/2007 106340 EDINA CAR WASH 115.02 SEPT WASHES 171881 3111 115.02 5620.5510 5911.6180 5862.5513 5862.5515 5822.5513 5842.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 05474.1705.30 04339.1705.30 GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD CONTRACTED REPAIRS COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 5310.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 5610.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 1553.6238 CAR WASH 10/1712007 8:11:06 Page- 8 Business Unit PUBLIC HEALTH ED ADMINISTRATION ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS EDINBOROUGH PARK PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING WM-474 W70TH WATERMAIN IMP STS -339 W70TH STORM IMP GOLF ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION POOL ADMINISTRATION ED ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 ANNUAL SERVICE MAINTENANCE 172075 CITY OF EDINA 1375.6406 536.76 Council Check Register 103985 FLOR, JON 350.00 EDINA LIQUOR AD 10/18/2007 -- 10/18/2007 2062 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 121564 FLUTE COCKTAIL 302565 10118/2007 101321 EDINA HARDWARE PERFORMANCE 10/23107 171814 100107 5610.6136 100.00 34.91 PAINT, SCRATCH PADS 00009235 171882 62677 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 101022 FRAME, SUSAN 34.91 812.95 ART SUPPLIES 00009217 171884 302566 10/1812007 812.95 116448. EGAN OIL COMPANY 18,860.61 GAS 00005413 171828 140535 1553.6581 GASOLINE 18,860.61 302567 10/1812007 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC. 1,287.80 PUMP MOTOR REPAIRS 00001005 171829 0034852 -IN 5921.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 1,287.80 302568 10/1812007 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 64.00 171778 602719 300.00 172162 605060 364.00 302569 10/18/2007 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 161.22 BATTERIES 00005989 171830 1- 2716241 17.33 FUEL CAP 00005704 172012 1- 2693666 178.55 302570 10/1812007 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL 26.63 3532 PHOTO FINISHING 00003532 171883 T2- 253662 26.63 302571 10/1812007 108544 FIRENET SYSTEMS INC. 10/17/2007 8:11:06 Page- 9 Business Unit ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN LIFT STATION MAINT 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1553.6530 1553.6530 1470.6408 536.76 ANNUAL SERVICE MAINTENANCE 172075 9418- 07- 10005SM 1375.6406 536.76 302572 10118/2007 103985 FLOR, JON 350.00 EDINA LIQUOR AD 171831 2062 2210.6103 350.00 302573 10/18/2007 121564 FLUTE COCKTAIL 100.00 PERFORMANCE 10/23107 171814 100107 5610.6136 100.00 302574 1011812007 101022 FRAME, SUSAN 812.95 ART SUPPLIES 00009217 171884 092007 5120.5510 812.95 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKING RAMP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/18/2007 105508 GEMPLER'S INC. 10/18/2007 -- 10/18/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1010299473 302575 10/18/2007 100764 G & K SERVICES 104.85 69.91 171885 093007 5511.6201 LAUNDRY 188.07 171885 093007 5913.6201 LAUNDRY 375.99 171885 093007 1646.6201 LAUNDRY 387.34 171885 093007 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 583.40 171885 093007 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 612.17 171885 093007 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT WEB DEVELOPMENT TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10/1712007 8:11:06 Page- 10 Business Unit ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE EDINBOROUGH PARK EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,216.88 302576 10/18/2007 105508 GEMPLER'S INC. 104.85 HOSE PARTS 00002203 172076 1010299473 5620.6406 104.85 302577 10118/2007 100920 GENUINE PARTS COMPANY- MINNEA 1,202.82 AUTO PARTS 172013 093007 1553.6530 1,202.82 302578 10/1812007 114801 GLADSTONE CONSTRUCTION INC. 287.18 GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION 172077 FIVE (FINAL) 4401.6710 287.18 302579 10/1812007 102658 GLEWWE DOORS INC. 771.35 GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION 172078 FINAL 4401.6710 771.35 302580 10118/2007 119936 GLOBAL OAK 1,650.00 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 171832 440 2210.6124 1,650.00 302581 10/1812007 101103 GRAINGER 19.35 HEADLIGHT 00001031 171886 9467340551 1301.6556 286.83 CORD REEL 00001031 171887 9467340544 1552.6406 306.18 302582 10/1812007 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC 1,532.00 171945 00019817 5842.5513 936.00 172163 00019818 5862.5513 2,468.00 302583 10/18/2007 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 1,052.25 171779 94520 5842.5513 GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT WEB DEVELOPMENT TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10/1712007 8:11:06 Page- 10 Business Unit ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE EDINBOROUGH PARK EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation 209.50 321.75 Subledger Account Description . COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 10/17/2007 8:11:06 Page - 11 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/18/2007 - 10/18/2007 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 171946 94652 5862.5513 171947 91372 5862.5513 172164 94651 5822.5513 Subledger Account Description . COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 10/17/2007 8:11:06 Page - 11 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 1,743.00 302584 10/18/2007 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 36.34 WINE POSTERS 171888 100907 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 119.94 POSTERS, GRAPE VINES 171888 100907 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 613.57 MISC BAR SUPPLIES 171888 100907 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 769.85 302585 10/18/2007 121536 GRAY MATTER CREATIVE LLC 439.20 PRINT SCORECARDS & PENCILS 171833 071002 1600.6575 PRINTING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 439.20 302586 10/18/2007 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 341.52 LIGHT BULBS 00002200 172079 929214099 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 202.16- CREDIT 172080 928501475 1646.6578 LAMPS & FIXTURES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 139.36 302587 10/1812007 102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES 173.88 GOLF BALLS 172081 36060 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 173.88 302588 10/18/2007 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 1,580.23 171780 664755 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 126.14- 171781 733855 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4.20 171948 668180 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,117.75 171949 668389 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 318.93 171950 668390 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 8,416.20 171951 663280 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,483.61 171952 668462 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 46.80 171953 668463 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,234.13 171954 668360 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,445.36 171955 668466 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1.05 171956 666536 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,573.19 171957 664758 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 706.61 171958 666726 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 58.68 172165 668358 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 572.89 172166 668359 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 56.58- 172167 734126 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 60.15- 172168 734737 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10117/2007 8:11:06 Council Check Register Page - 12 10/18/2007 — 10/18/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 60.90- 172169 733939 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE • VERNON SELLING 26,255.86 302589 10/18/2007 101255 HASLER INC. 95.99 METER RENTAL 172136 8762739 1400.6235 POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 95.99 302590 10/18/2007 100797 HAWKINS INC. 1,985.76 TONKAZORB 00005847 171834 1116338 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 1,985.76 302591 10/18/2007 119474 HAY DOBBS 9,482.47 ARCHITECT FEES 171889 6004.006 -5 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 9,482.47 302592 10/18/2007 101576 HEGGIES PIZZA 106.65 PIZZA 172082 1006427 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 106.65 302593 10/18/2007 103585 HENNEPIN COUNTY HOUSING DEPART 16,352.04 REHAB LOAN PAYBACK 171835 100907 2101.4205 FEDERAL AID CDBG REVENUES 16,352.04 302594 10/18/2007 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 873.12 RADIO ADMIN FEE 172014 27098014 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 873.12 302595 10/18/2007 101503 HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC RECORDS 96.00 FILING FEES - ACCT 503 172137 9 /30STMT 2127.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMM DEV BLK GRANT 96.00 302596 10118/2007 101102 HIDDEN FENCE OF MINNESOTA 145.00 DOG FENCE REPAIR 172015 092507 05462.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -462 WOODHILL 145.00 302597 10/18/2007 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 134.80 SOAP 00002202 172083 2265950 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 359.79 CLEANERS 00002192 172084 2256291 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 494.59 302598 10/18/2007 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 415.95 171959 432946 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/17/2007 8:11:06 Council Check Register Page - 13 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT MASTER PLAN: COUNTRYSIDE BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES HEALTH ALERT NETWORK GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT BRAEMAR PARK SHELTER CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDINGS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM-462 WOODHILL GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 10/18/2007 — 10/1812007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 51.90 172170 432948 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,150.45 172171 432947 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 390.88 172172 432949 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT MASTER PLAN: COUNTRYSIDE BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES HEALTH ALERT NETWORK GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT BRAEMAR PARK SHELTER CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDINGS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM-462 WOODHILL GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,009.18 302599 10/18/2007 102044 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC. 1,320.00 ARCHITECT SERVICES 171890 100407 47056.6710 1,320.00 302600 10/18/2007 108658 HOME DEPOT 100.20 PERMIT REFUND 172016 ED084170 1495.4111 100.20 302601 10118/2007 102463 HOULE, WAYNE D. 40.50 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 172017 101007 1240.6107 1,191.87 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 172017 101007 1240.6104 1,232.37 302602 10/18/2007 100842 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 255.64 BESY BUY HEADSETS 00004465 172085 001723591 -001 1120.6710 255.64 BESY BUY HEADSETS 00004465 172085 001723591 -001 4204.6406 511.26 BESY BUY HEADSETS 00004465 172085 001723591 -001 1400.6406 1,022.54 302603 10/18/2007 116191 INSTY•PRI NTS 277.84 PRINTING OPEN HOUSE BALLS 00007194 171836 78126 1647.6406 277.84 302604 1011812007 121579 INTERNATIONAL BRONZE 125.00 PLAQUE 00007191 172086 07 -11298 47052.6710 125.00 302605 10/18/2007 100818 INTERSTATE POWER SYSTEMS INC 2,898.78 TRANSFER SWITCH REPAIR 00005847 171837 R001011462 5912.6180 2,898.78 302606 10118/2007 121574 IRENE, SUZANNE 149.00 DRIVEWAY REPAIRS 172018 101007 05462.1705.30 149.00 302607 10118/2007 100828 JERRY'S FOODS 14.12 171891 093007 1470.6406 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT MASTER PLAN: COUNTRYSIDE BUILDING PERMITS INSPECTIONS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES HEALTH ALERT NETWORK GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT BRAEMAR PARK SHELTER CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDINGS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM-462 WOODHILL GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/17/2007 8:11:06 Council Check Register Page - 14 10/18/2007 -- 10/18/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 23.93 171891 093007 1470.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 39.74 171891 093007 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 49.02 171891 093007 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 66.76 171891 093007 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 297.10 171891 093007 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 490.67 302608 10/18/2007 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 6.99 171838 093007 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 7.49 171838 093007 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 9.98 171838 093007 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 10.76 171838 093007 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 11.26 171838 093007 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 26.55 171838 093007 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 40.50 171838 093007 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 41.07 171838 093007 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING 47.23 171838 093007 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 49.38 171838 093007 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL (BILLING) 59.43 171838 093007 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 62.85 171838 093007 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 93.64 171838 093007 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 99.21 171838 093007 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 157.49 171838 093007 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 160.83 171838 093007 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 224.76 171838 093007 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 593.73 171838 093007 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 842.11 171838 093007 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 2,545.26 302609 10118/2007 100830 JERRY'S PRINTING 53.25 EDINA LIQUOR STAMPS 172019 41308 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 53.25 302610 10118/2007 102146 JESSEN PRESS 50.91 PARK & REC INSIDER 171839 636343011 5510.6575 PRINTING ARENA ADMINISTRATION 50.91 PARK & REC INSIDER 171839 636343011 1629.6575 PRINTING ADAPTIVE RECREATION 101.82 PARK & REC INSIDER 171839 636343011 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 203.67 PARK & REC INSIDER 171839 636343011 1600.6575 PRINTING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 4,382.00 PARK & REC INSIDER 171839 636343011 2210.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 4,789.31 302611 10118/2007 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN R55CKREG LOG2000D CITY OF EDINA 10/17/2007 8:11:06 Council Check Register Page - 15 10/18/2007 -- 10/18/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Descriptlon Business Unit 5,299.37 171782 1109956 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 181.00 172087 1117408 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 3,730.99 172173 1116800 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 34.50 172174 1116801 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 6,762.35 172175 1116806 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4,520.40 172176 1109998 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 42.00 172177 1109999 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 20,570.61 302613 10/18/2007 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 4.32 171783 1329146 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,011.39 171784 1329139 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4.32 171785 1329141 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 7,990.98 171786 1329137 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,965.30 171787 1329134 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,532.29 171788 1329140 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR. YORK SELLING 2,882.40 171789 1329145 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,033.33 171790 1329147 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 191.40 171791 1330134 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 57.83- 171792 356348 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,155.87 171960 1332886 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 382.80 171961 1330132 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 111.60 171962 1330189 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 143.34 171963 1332885 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 635.40 171964 1332875 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 510.55 171965 1332884 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,504.84 171966 1332889 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,388.75 172178 1332879 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,594.61 172179 1332880 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 68.14 172180 1332882 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,069.74 172181 1332887 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,398.48 172182 1332872 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 267.93 172183 1332870 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,291.53 172184 1332873 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 461.29 172185 1332871 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 45,542.77 302614 10118/2007 104369 KARKHOFF, NANCY 116.57 UNIFORM PURCHASE 172138 101507 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 116.57 392615 10/18/2007 121581 KNOX, LASHAYNE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/17/2007 8:11:06 Council Check Register Page - 16 10/18/2007 -- 10/18/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 100.00 CANCELLATION REFUND 172088 101207 5601.4554 EDINBOROUGH PARK EB /CL REVENUES 100.00 302616 10118/2007 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 352.00 TOWING SERVICE 00001171 172139 57698 1553.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 352.00 302617 10/18/2007 120877 LANNERS, JOSEPH 225.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 172089 101107 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY 225.00 302618 10/18/2007 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 237.93 DRILL BITS, TERMINALS 00001017 171840 6085819 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 237.93 302619 10/18/2007 117407 LEXISNEXIS 110.00 BACKGROUND CHECKS 172020 0709219784 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 110.00 302620 10/1812007 105726 LINDMAN, DAVID 56.58 INK CARTRIDGES 172140 101507 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 58.58 302621 10/1812007 121565 LUCAS HOME REPAIR 1,014.83 EXTERIOR PAINTING 171841 100907 2127.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMM DEV BLK GRANT 1,014.83 302622 10118/2007 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 584.67 172186 24791 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 584.67 302623 10/18/2007 100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 1,910.61 STRIP BROOMS 00005820 171842 2076464 1310.6523 BROOMS STREET CLEANING 1,910.61 302624 10/1812007 100865 MAGNUSON SOD 213.62 SOD 172021 093007 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 291.46 DIRT & ANGLES 172021 093007 1642.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT FIELD MAINTENANCE 408.76 DIRT, SOD 172021 093007 5913.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT DISTRIBUTION 1,640.45 MULCH 172021 093007 5630.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES 2,554.29 R55CKREG LOG20000 350.00 CITY OF EDINA 302628 Council Check Register 101267 MBPTA 10/18/2007 -- 10/1812007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 302625 10/18/2007 114699 MANAGED SERVICES INC. 302629 10/1812007 117.15 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 172090 W15602 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 117.15 809.40 PLANTS 00002197 172091 41696 302626 10/1812007 100868 MARK VII SALES 809.40 4,036.20 302630 171793 245844 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1,399.90 171794 245862 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 00001038 171843 748.60- 1301.6406 171795 246149 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 275.70 171796 245645 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 101987 MENARDS 2,885.18 171797 245644 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 20.21 19.95 00002365 171798 245647 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1,957.55 HALLOWEEN DECORATIONS 171967 246637 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,494.25 159.65 172187 248258 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 13,817.33 66.23 PAINTING SUPPLIES 00002201 172094 302627 10/18/2007 PAINT 100869 MARTIN- MCALLISTER 508.65 10/17/2007 8:11:06 Page - 17 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 350.00 EMPLOYEE ASSESSMENT 171892 5725 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL INSPECTIONS EDINBOROUGH PARK GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,194.00 FINAL PAYMENT LBP ABATEMENT 171844 58681 2127.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMM DEV BLK GRANT 1,194.00 350.00 302628 10/18/2007 101267 MBPTA 70.00 PERMIT TECH SEMINAR 172022 101207 1495.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 70.00 302629 10/1812007 100875 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC. 809.40 PLANTS 00002197 172091 41696 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS 809.40 302630 10/18/2007 101483 MENARDS 17.00 SCREWS, DRYWALL 00001038 171843 74845 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 17.00 302631 10118/2007 101987 MENARDS 20.21 TOW STRAP 00002365 172023 31365 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 262.56 HALLOWEEN DECORATIONS 00002204 172092 39063 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 159.65 HALLOWEEN DECORATIONS 00002205 172093 39355 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 66.23 PAINTING SUPPLIES 00002201 172094 36726 5620.6532 PAINT 508.65 302632 10/18/2007 114680 MERIT BUILDING COMPANY INC. INSPECTIONS EDINBOROUGH PARK GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,194.00 FINAL PAYMENT LBP ABATEMENT 171844 58681 2127.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMM DEV BLK GRANT 1,194.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/18/2007 — 10/18/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 302633 1011812007 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 291.60 LINERS, SOAP 00001035 172024 72690 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 291.60 302634 1011812007 103192 METRO LEGAL SERVICES 38.00 TITLE/TAX SEARCH 172142 1321624 2127.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 38.00 302635 10/18/2007 103008 MICKMAN BROTHERS 140.32 SPRINKLER -4820 UPPER TERRACEOOREPAIR 172025 IRR026440 05462.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 140.32 302636 10118/2007 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 1,027.18 ASPHALT 00005909 171845 189977MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP 1,027.18 302637 10118/2007 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 442.80 171799 0188413808 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 442.80 302638 10/18/2007 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 5.75 CYLINDER 00001236 171846 R109071357 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5.75 302639 1011812007 100522 MINNESOTA AIR INC. 424.26 MOTORS, BLOWER WHEELS 00001120 171847 2088967 -00 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 424.26 302640 10118/2007 100903 MINNESOTA ELEVATOR INC 2,805.00 GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION 172095 APPL 3 4401.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 2,805.00 302641 10118/2007 100066 MINNESOTA MAILING SOLUTIONS 162.12 INK CARTRIDGE 171848 47745 1550.6235 POSTAGE 27.30 POSTAGE MACHINE TAPES 172141 47885 1400.6235 POSTAGE 189.42 302642 10/1812007 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT 10/17/2007 8:11:06 Page - 18 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING COMM DEV BLK GRANT WM -462 WOODHILL GENERAL MAINTENANCE VERNON SELLING CENT SVC PW BUILDING ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW & COMM CTR CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,623.99 2" METERS AND FLANGES 00005827 171849 0204784 5914.5516 COST OF GOODS SOLD METERS TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 9,061.21 3/4" METERS 00005838 171850 0212640 5914.5516 COST OF GOODS SOLD METERS TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 259.77 VALVE BOX RISERS 00005854 172096 0215898 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 11,944.97 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/1812007 -- 10/18/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 302643 1011812007 101459 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARKAS 136.00 VOLLEYBALL TEAM REGISTRATION 8 172026 101207 4077.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 136.00 302644 10118/2007 108537 MOORE, JOEL 159.96 COMPUTER PRINTER 172027 100907 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 159.96 302645 1011812007 120745 MORTON BUILDINGS INC. 3,075.00 STORAGE BLDG - FINAL PMT 172097 100807 7411.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 3,075.00 302646 1011812007 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 689.86 GREENSMOWER REPAIRS 00002376 172028 596105 -00 .5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 689.86 302647 10/1812007 121575 MUENKEL, TAMI 375.00 REFUND FOR CANCELLED EVENT 172029 100807 5601.4555 CENTENNIAL LAKES PARK 375.00 302648 10/18/2007 101390 MUNICIPAL EMERGENCY SERVICES 1 1,482.50 QUICK ATTACK NOZZLE 00003884 171893 444709 1470.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,482.50 302649 10/18/2007 103007 NELSON, DAVID 100.00 RESTITUTION REIMBURSEMENT 172030 101207 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 100.00 302650 1011812007 106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS 19.54 FORKS FOR RESALE 172098 29574 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 19.54 302651 10/1812007 116697 NORBLOM PLUMBING 17.84 PERMIT REFUND 172031 ED083454 1495.4112 PLUMBING PERMITS 17.84 302652 10118/2007 100712 NORTHERN WATER WORKS SUPPLY 2,178.59 5- HYD CAP ASSEMBLY 00005839 171894 S01112544.002 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS 4,646.94 FIRE HYDRANTS 00005839 172032 S01112544.003 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS 6,825.53 10/17/2007 8:11:06 Page - 19 Business Unit EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY CENTENNIAL LAKES EB /CL REVENUES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EDINBOROUGH PARK INSPECTIONS DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG LOG20000 185.00 CITY OF EDINA 171895 176459 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL Council Check Register 185.00 10/18/2007 -- 10/18/2007 10/18/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 302653 10/18/2007 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 121497 NORTHWEST ASPHALT 101907 01336.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA336 W70TH - FRANCE TO YORK 5,590.75 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 172099 101907 05455.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 302660 7,576.25 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 172099 101907 03426.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 24,557.50 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 172099 101907 08048.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 68,046.94 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 172099 101907 04314.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 263,441.41 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 172099 101907 01331.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 369,212.85 663.65 302654 10/18/2007 093007 118639 NORTHWEST LASERS INC. REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 663.65 95.64 TRIPOD LOCK LEVERS, PAINT 00004069 171851 S100036985 1260.6577 LUMBER 302662 1011812007 95.64 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 302655 10/1812007 100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO. 171800 8160340 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,059.71 TIRES 00001024 172033 NW- 109505 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 2,059.71 302656 1011812007 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 182.07 TONER CARTRIDGES 172100 403527508 -001 5610.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 182.07 302657 10/18/2007 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 267.74 COOKIES 172101 43439774 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 267.74 302658 10/18/2007 103624 P & L AUTOMOTIVE INC. 10/17/2007 8:11:06 Page - 20 Business Unit WM455 SOUTH VIEW TO VALLEY V SS426 SOUTH VIEW TO VALLEY V L -48 CONCORD AVE STS -314 SOUTH VIEW TO VALLEY V BA -331 CONCORD: VALLEY VIEW ENGINEERING GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ED ADMINISTRATION GRILL 185.00 WINDOW TINTING 171895 176459 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 185.00 302659 10/18/2007 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 267,669.91 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 3 172102 101907 01336.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA336 W70TH - FRANCE TO YORK 267,669.91 302660 10/18/2007 100941 PARK NICOLLET CLINIC 1,025.50 EMPLOYMENT PHYSICALS 172103 100507 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,025.50 302661 1011812007 101718 PARTS PLUS 663.65 AUTO PARTS 171852 093007 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 663.65 302662 1011812007 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1,738.26 171800 8160340 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/17/2007 8:11:06 Council Check Register Page - 21 10/1812007 -- 10/18/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 480.00 171968 8160919 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 400.00 171969 8161049 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,868.46 171970 8161127 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,061.32 172188 8161128 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,385.47 172189 8161125 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 223.00- 172190 8159831 -CM 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4.17- 172191 8159954 -CM 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 8,706.34 302663 10/18/2007 103512 PETTY CASH 15.00 CHECKBOOK 172143 101507 1400.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 16.95 NEW CHECKS CHARGE 172143 101507 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 22.33 CHECKBOOK 172143 101507 1419.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS RESERVE PROGRAM 40.00 CHECKBOOK 172143 101507 1400.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 77.45 CHECKBOOK 172143 101507 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 79.95 CHECKBOOK 172143 101507 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 201.32 CHECKBOOK 172143 101507 1400.6106 MEETING EXPENSE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 201.94 CHECKBOOK 172143 101507 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 320.00 CHECKBOOK 172143 101507 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 974.94 302664 10118/2007 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 81.03 171801 2519678 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 281.08 171802 2519679 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,744.13 171971 2522648 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,489.10 171972 2522646 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 49.08 171973 2522647 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 560.31 172192 2522644 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,344.55 172193 2522649 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 676.25 172194 2522641 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 889.35 172195 2522642 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,020.33 172196 2522638 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 58.63 172197 2522640 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 10,193.84 302665 10/18/2007 101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY 100.00 PHOTO SHOOTS 171853 100707 2210.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 100.00 302666 1011812007 116396 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 842.69 METHANE GAS 172104 27365486 7413.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF FIRE TOWER 842.69 R55CKREG LOG20000 YORK SELLING 106341 PRIORITY DISPATCH YORK SELLING CITY OF EDINA VERNON SELLING 231.19 EMD CERTIFICATION CLASS 172144 30240 Council Check Register 231.19 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 302670 10/18/2007 10/18/2007 -- 10/18/2007 113732 PROFESSIONAL TOOL Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 302667 10/18/2007 100966 PRINTERS SERVICE INC 302671 10/1812007 144.00 BLADE SHARPENING 00008026 171896 230096 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,005.00 144.00 172105 07022.06 490.00 302668 10/1812007 172106 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 1,495.00 233.00 302672 10118/2007 171974 668469 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,228.53 623.37 171975 668461 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 266.86 ROLL TOWELS, WYPALL 171976 668215 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 884.45 88.75 171977 668468 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 302669 10118/2007 YORK SELLING 106341 PRIORITY DISPATCH YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 231.19 EMD CERTIFICATION CLASS 172144 30240 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 231.19 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 302670 10/18/2007 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 113732 PROFESSIONAL TOOL SALES YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 48.88 COUPLINGS 00001136 171854 70415 48.88 302671 10/1812007 100969 PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING ENGINEE 1,005.00 WELL #20 DESIGN 172105 07022.06 490.00 PUNCH LIST INSPECTION 172106 03034.47 1,495.00 302672 10118/2007 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 623.37 ROLL TOWELS, LINERS 00002189 172107 4055 261.08 ROLL TOWELS, WYPALL 00002184 172108 4048 884.45 302673 10/1812007 100971 QUALITY WINE 17.25 171803 915637 -00 3,736.98 171804 915830 -00 155.40 171805 917192 -00 368.70 171806 917127 -00 1,223.32 171978 918507 -00 3,355.40 171979 918734 -00 1,592.25 171980 914603 -00 530.75 171981 918733 -00 85.15 171982 918911 -00 3,195.53 171983 918732 -00 245.45 171984 918508 -00 1400.6104 1553.6530 05471.1705.20 05427.1705.21 5620.6511 5620.6511 5842.5512 5842.5513 5862.5512 5862.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5842.5512 5822.5513 10117/2007 8:11:06 Page - 22 Business Unit ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING INSPECTION CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN WM-471 NEW WELL #20 PLANT #3 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/17/2007 8:11:06 Council Check Register Page - 23 10/18/2007 - 10/18/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,073.97 171985 918736 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,947.16 171986 918735 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 21.00- 171987 917605 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 997.01 172198 918506-00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 370.30 172199 918115 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,900.85 172200 917902 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 92.00 172201 917903 -00 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,363.82 172202 917904 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 19.00- 172203 914699 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 24,211.29 302674 10/1812007 101965 QWEST 18.02 651 281 -1355 8001311 171897 1355 -10/01 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 746.72 612 E01 -0426 171898 0426 -10/01 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 506.16 612 E01 -8391 171899 8391 -10/07 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 86.38 952 926 -0419 171900 0419 -10/07 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 284.12 612 E24 -8656 171901 8656 -10/07 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 506.36 612 E24 -8657 171902 8657 -10/07 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 506.16 612 E01 -8392 171903 8392 -10/07 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 284.12 612 E24 -8661 171904 8661 -10/07 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 51.56 952 926 -0092 171905 0092 -10/07 5913.6188 TELEPHONE DISTRIBUTION 55.20 171906 092807 5911.6188 TELEPHONE PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 57.89 171906 092807 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 83.20 171906 092807 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 96.47 171906 092807 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 99.44 171906 092807 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 106.57 171906 092807 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 161.61 171906 092807 5610.6188 TELEPHONE ED ADMINISTRATION 163.94 171906 092807 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 232.37 171906 092807 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 263.88 171906 092807 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER. 356.01 171906 092807 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 2,106.87 171906 092807 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 6,773.05 302675 10/1812007 117692 R & B CLEANING INC. 500.55 RAMP STAIRWELL CLEANING 00001148 171855 176389 -00 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 500.55 302676 10/18/2007 100975 RED WING SHOE STORE 109.95 SAFETY BOOTS 00005189 171856 7250000684 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 144.95 SAFETY BOOTS 00005189 171856 7250000684 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/1712007 8:11:06 Council Check Register Page - 24 10/18/2007 -- 10118/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 152.96 SAFETY BOOTS 00005189 171856 7250000684 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 195.46 SAFETY BOOTS 00005189 171856 7250000684 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 603.32 302677 10/18/2007 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 33.52 JACK 00001040 171857 1356841 -01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 33.52 302678 10/18/2007 121580 ROADWAY EXPRESS 198.62 SHIPPING FOR SOCKS 172109 671439275 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 197.46 SHIPPING FOR SOCKS 172110 671 - 476315 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 396.08 302679 10/18/2007 101979 ROFIDAL, KEVIN 21.32 DVD & RW 172034 100907 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 40.00 TRAINING MEALS 172034 100907 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 61.32 302680 10118/2007 105534 ROTARY CLUB OF EDINA 278.00 DUES - J. BENNEROTTE 171858 81 2210.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS COMMUNICATIONS 278.00 302681 10/18/2007 121566 SAFETY GEAR DEPOT 87.58 SAFETY VESTS 00004065 171859 4834 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 87.58 302682 10/18/2007 117807 SAM'S CLUB 16.02 7715 09 0304872906 172111 1951,3370 7413.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF FIRE TOWER 16.02 302683 10/18/2007 100305 SARA LEE FOOD SERVICES 903.64 COFFEE 172112 300581321071 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 903.64 302684 10/18/2007 121468 SCHUNIOR, ANN 169.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 172113 101107 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 169.00 302685 10118/2007 104239 SEAGER, KRISTI 125.00 PERFORMANCE 10/25107 171815 100107 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 125.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10117/2007 8:11:06 Council Check Register Page - 25 10/18/2007 -- 10/18/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 302686 10118/2007 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 3,274.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 172114 101107 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY 3,274.00 302687 1011812007 101000 SIR SPEEDY 343.15 BUSINESS CARD SHELLS 172035 55355 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 57.78 BUSINESS CARDS 172036 55332 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 400.93 302688 10/18/2007 110977 SOW, ADAMA 143.89 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 172115 101107 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 164.45 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 172115 101107 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 308.34 302689 10/1812007 105193 SPAIN, MARK 155.33 UNIFORM PURCHASE 172145 101207 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 155.33 302690 10118/2007 121578 SPOONER, PETE 75.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 172116 101107 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 75.00 302691 10118/2007 101004 SPS COMPANIES 211.56 GARBAGE DISPOSAL ASSEMBLY 00002194 172117 S1726615.001 5620.6530 REPAIR PARTS EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,307.04 GARBAGE DISPOSAL 00002182 172118 S1714097.001 5620.6530 REPAIR PARTS EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,518.60 302692 1011812007 121569 STOCKER EXCAVATING CO. 28.76 PERMIT REFUND 172037 ED084350 1495.4112 PLUMBING PERMITS INSPECTIONS 28.76 302693 1011812007 106452 STONE, HOLLY 960.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 172119 101107 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 960.00 302694 10/18/2007 102390 STRAND MANUFACTURING CO INC 249.01 INDUCERS 00001010 171860 26342 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDINGS 249.01 302695 10/1812007 101015 STRETCHERS 159.73 FLASHLIGHT, BATTERY 171907 1464264 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 170.39 PUSH BUMPERS 00005649 171908 1464871 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/17/2007 8:11:06 Council Check Register Page - 26 10/18/2007 -- 10/18/2007 Check # Dale Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 330.12 302696 10/18/2007 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 6,026.50 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005648 172038 CTCB527221 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 6,026.50 302697 10/1812007 101336 SULLIVAN, MONICA 735.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 172120 101107 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 735.00 302698 10/18/2007 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 1,500.00 ART CENTER ADS 00016102 171909 1027742 5125.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER MEDIA STUDIO 1,500.00 302699 10/18/2007 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 486.00 172204 685606 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 486.00 302700 10/18/2007 100278 TAPE COMPANY, THE 12.40 CASSETTES 171910 SOINV000658867 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 12.40 302701 10/18/2007 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 60.75 171807 464553 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,541.40 171808 464554 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 67.00 172121 29279 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 95.50 172205 465363 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,399.75 172206 465353 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,164.40 302702 10/18/2007 113560 TIMBERWALL LANDSCAPING INC. 911.60 DRYWALL 00001122 172039 10006319 1344.6577 LUMBER RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE 911.60 302703 16/18/2007 101474 TITLEIST 135.95 MERCHANDISE 172122 2005059 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 135.95 302704 10118/2007 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 52.29 WELDING GAS 00001152 171911 440254 5913.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 28.63 WELDING GAS 00001151 171912 440252 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 29.88 WELDING CYLINDERS 172040 440253 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES R55CKREG LOG20000. MEETING EXPENSE 172042 100407 CITY OF EDINA MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 16.90 NET ZERO 172043 OCT42007 Council Check Register PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 21.94 172146 101107 10/18/2007 -- 10/18/2007 GENERAL MAINTENANCE Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 172146 25.02 OXYGEN 00001117 172123 188793 5913.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES 172146 101107 135.82 DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,013.89 302705 10/1812007 101693 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS 302710 10/18/2007 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 14.20 MONTHLY FTP FOLDER 171861 21851 5820.6160 DATA PROCESSING 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 14.20 MONTHLY FTP FOLDER 171861 21851 5840.6160 DATA PROCESSING 14.20 MONTHLY FTP FOLDER 171861 21851 5860.6160 DATA PROCESSING 20.00 42.60 172044 101207 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW REVOLVING 302706 10/18/2007 101039 TOTAL TOOL 302712 10118/2007 101908 US FOODSERVICE INC 69.23 HOIST INSPECTION 172041 77106472 5630.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 172124 093007 69.23 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 550.00 172124 302707 10/18/2007 GENERAL SUPPLIES 104064 TRANS UNION LLC 12.30 BACKGROUND CHECK 171913 09732742 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 12.30 302708 10/18/2007 102255 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO 22.05 OXYGEN 00003649 171914 838468 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 51.44 OXYGEN 00003649 171915 838460 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 73.49 302709 10/1812007 115379 U.S. BANK 10/17/2007 8:11:06 Page - 27 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION 50TH STREET GENERAL LIQUOR YORK GENERAL VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 25.00 MEETING EXPENSE 172042 100407 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL 16.90 NET ZERO 172043 OCT42007 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 21.94 172146 101107 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 422.30 172146 101107 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 928.00 172146 101107 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 1,599.75 172146 101107 1553.6160 DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 3,013.89 302710 10/18/2007 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 430.00 SITE MANAGEMENT CLASSES 171862 100907 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL 430.00 302711 10/18/2007 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 20.00 SOIL TEST 172044 101207 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW REVOLVING 20.00 302712 10118/2007 101908 US FOODSERVICE INC 300.19 172124 093007 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 550.00 172124 093007 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/18/2007 -- 10/18/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 2,770.35 172124 093007 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS PAPER SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS PRINTING 10/17/2007 8:11:06 Page- 28 Business Unit GRILL VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL PUBLIC HEALTH BUILDING MAINTENANCE CLUB HOUSE A -231 W 49 1/2 ST M &O A -233 HALIFAX M &O A -232 W 51ST ST M &O A -234 50th STREET M &O A -230 LINCOLN DR M &O COLLECTION SYSTEMS YORK SELLING GRILL CENTENNIAL LAKES CENT SVC PW BUILDING EDINBOROUGH PARK ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 3,620.54 302713 10118/2007 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. 11.24 PAGERS 171916 Q0317425J 5860.6406 22.48 PAGERS 171916 Q0317425J 1490.6406 22.48 PAGERS 171916 Q0317425J 1646.6406 22.55 PAGERS 171916 Q0317425J 5420.6406 78.75 302714 10/18/2007 103500 VALLEY PAVING INC. 11,648.19 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 172045 101907 01231.1705.30 14,832.83 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 172045 101907 01233.1705.30 21,335.58 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 172045 101907 01232.1705.30 24,643.32 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 172045 101907. 01234.1705.30 85,636.09 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 172045 101907 01230.1705.30 158,096.01 302715 10118/2007 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 12,715.97 SEWER MAIN REPAIRS 00005856 172125 12614 5923.6180 12,715.97 302716 10/18/2007 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 519.06 BAGS 00007512 171917 054951 -00 5842.6512 311.30 CAN LINERS, CUPS 172126 054952 -00 5421.6406 830.36 302717 10/18/2007 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 63.90 TIRE RIMS 00002369 172046 33959 5630.6406 63.90 302718 10/18/2007 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 151.70 BALLASTS, BULBS 00001118 172047 15086825 -00 1552.6406 151.70 302719 10/18/2007 102886 WAGNER GREENHOUSES INC. 127.97 PLANTS 00002196 172127 110559 5620.6620 127.97 302720 10/18/2007 121042 WALLACE CARLSON PRINTING 385.39 ENVELOPES 00009237 171918 14239 5110.6575 385.39 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTED REPAIRS PAPER SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS PRINTING 10/17/2007 8:11:06 Page- 28 Business Unit GRILL VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL PUBLIC HEALTH BUILDING MAINTENANCE CLUB HOUSE A -231 W 49 1/2 ST M &O A -233 HALIFAX M &O A -232 W 51ST ST M &O A -234 50th STREET M &O A -230 LINCOLN DR M &O COLLECTION SYSTEMS YORK SELLING GRILL CENTENNIAL LAKES CENT SVC PW BUILDING EDINBOROUGH PARK ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1011712007 8:11:06 Council Check Register Page - 29 10/18/2007 -- 10/18/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 302721 10/18/2007 121568 WALTER MECHANICAL 46.00 PERMIT REFUND 172048 ED083852 1495.4110 HEATING & VENTING LICENSE INSPECTIONS 46.00 302722 10/18/2007 119730 WEB ELECTRIC 733.21 ELECTRICAL REPAIRS 00008025 171919 1702 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 733.21 302723 10/18/2007 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 135.00 , 171809 176542 -00 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 778.90 171810 176323 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 136.00- 171811 176215 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 666.90 171988 176858 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 829.19 171989 177021 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 50.00- 171990 176179 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 414.40 172207 176859 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 88.00- 172208 176223 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 16.66- 172209 176524 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 16.66- 172210 176224 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,517.07 302724 1011812007 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 421.48 171991 207330 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,870.52 171992 207328 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 650.48 172211 207329 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 462.65 172212 207327 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,405.13 302725 10118/2007 116643 WOODLAND STOVES & FIREPLACES 54.32 PERMIT REFUND 172049 ED081780 1495.4110 HEATING & VENTING LICENSE INSPECTIONS 54.32 302726 10/18/2007 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 1,326.00 171812 200540 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 631.50 171993 201011 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 634.00 172213 201083 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,591.50 302727 1011812007 118371 WORLD GOLF COLLECTION 69.00 LIP BALM 00005089 172147 INV01745 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 69.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10117/2007 8:11:06 Council Check Register Page - 30 10/18/2007 -- 10/18/2007 Check # Dale Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 302728 10/18/2007 121563 WTS MINNESOTA 100.00 SEMINAR 171863 100907 1140.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PLANNING 100.00 302729 10/18/2007 101726 XCEL ENERGY 20,760.27. 51- 5605640 -1 171864 127064495 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 545.40 51- 6137136 -8 171920 127180340 5430.6185 LIGHT & POWER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 20,611.48 51- 4888627 -1 171921 127150738 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 6,485.44 51- 6824328 -7 171922 127704808 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER CLUB HOUSE 3,998.46 51- 5619094 -8 171923 127853219 1552.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,016.26 51- 6979948 -4 171924 127201645 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1,506.93 51- 6979948 -4 171924 127201645 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,548.43 51- 6979948-4 171924 127201645 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK OCCUPANCY 4,132.39 51- 5888961 -7 171925 127859569 1375.6185 LIGHT & POWER PARKING RAMP 4,807.74 51- 6121102 -5 171926 127511686 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 3,263.70 51- 6840050 -6 171927 127526919 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 354.77 51- 4197645 -8 172050 128005152 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 69,031.27 302730 10/1812007 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 464.41 SEPT USAGE - BLDG /ENG 00004322 171865 028128522 1550.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 88.63 COPIER USAGE 171928 028128536 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 553.04 302731 10/18/2007 101091 ZIEGLER INC 345.00 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE 171929 E3809743 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CITY HALL GENERAL 345.00 302732 10118/2007 101386 ZUHRAH SHRINE CONCERT BAND 75.00 PERFORMANCE 10/21/07 171813 100107 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 75.00 1,540,247.94 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,540,247.94 Total Payments 1,540,247.94 R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10117/2007 8:13:19 Council Check Summary 10/18/2007 - 10/18/2007 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 87,250.49 02100 CDBG FUND 18,694.87 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 6,760.00 03066 IBR #2 FUND 13,791.26 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 475,251.58 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 263,441.41 05100 ART CENTER FUND 10,648.49 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 53.25 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 461.56 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 16,152.60 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 29,919.89 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 12,085.12 05800 LIQUOR FUND 202,200.51 05900 UTILITY FUND 130,485.68 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 234,935.59 05950 RECYCLING FUND 33,958.00 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 4,157.64 Report Totals 1,540,247.94 We emllrm % the best of ours and befief, that thew daft Comply in d material respects Wfth the °fW of #W Cfty e o� Page- R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/23/2007 10/25/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 302733 10123/2007 121026 PALDA & SONS INC. 1,425.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.6 172731 101007 05462.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 1,425.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.6 172731 101007 05463.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 14,253.85 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.6 172731 101007 04334.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 19,023.75 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.6 172731 101007 03432.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 19,047.50 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.6 172731 101007 03431.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 41,985.91 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.6 172731 101007 04333.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 74,718.05 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 6 172731 101007 01337.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 97,111.69 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.6 172731 101007 01338.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 268,990.75 302734 10/25/2007 118536 A &B AUTO ELECTRIC INC. 319.50 ALTERNATOR 00005650 172231 50428 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 319.50 302735 1012512007 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 22.04 172391 609824 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 53.56 172392 609825 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 78.68 172602 609826 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 154.28 302736 1012512007 101441 ADECCO EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 615.00 UB TEMP 172522 63631360 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 615.00 302737 10/2512007 105162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 29.41 ALARM SERVICE 172475 58826015 5111.6250 ALARM SERVICE 29.41 302738 10125/2007 102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES 1,235.78 READY MIX 00005917 172232 4205323 1314.6520 CONCRETE 1,039.97 READY MIX 00005917 172327 4206055 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 467.99 READY MIX 00005902 172328 4205324 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 850.67 READY MIX 00005917 172476 4204327 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 3,594.41 302739 10/2512007 100620 AIM ELECTRONICS 12,726.75 WEST ARENA SCOREBOARD 00008075 172713 31449 5500.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 5,516.70 EAST ARENA SCOREBOARD 00007183 172714 31450 5500.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT 18,243.45 302740 10/25/2007 102715 ALLEGRA PRINT & IMAGING 10/24/200711:32:18 Page - 1 Business Unit WMA62 WOODHILL WMA63 SOUTHDALE 1ST STS -334 SOUTHDALE 1 ST ADD SS -432 SOUTHDALE 1ST ADD SS -431 WOODHILL STS -333 WOODHILL BA -337 WOODHILL NEIGHBORHOOD BA -338 SOUTHDALE 1ST ADDITION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING GENERAL (BILLING) ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT STREET RENOVATION BUILDINGS BUILDINGS BUILDING MAINTENANCE ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/241200711:32:18 Council Check Register Page - 2 10123/2007 -- 10/25/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 373.82 ELECTION JUDGE MANUALS 172538 68070 1180.6575 PRINTING ELECTION 373.82 302741 1012512007 121421 AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING 1 9,087.35 PROJECT TESTING SERVICES 172233 38829 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 9,087.35 302742 10/25/2007 101874 ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC. 158.69 CONVERTER 00001160 172539 46604 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 158.69 302743 10/2512007 102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER 1,562.57 INSTALLED ANTENNAS 172234 75197 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,562.57 302744 10/25/2007 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 71.14 PIPE ELBOWS, FITTINGS 00004070 172477 21095 05455.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES WM -455 SOUTH VIEW TO VALLEY V 71.14 PIPE ELBOWS, FITTINGS 00004070 172477 21095 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 142.28 302745 10/25/2007 102646 AQUA LOGIC INC. 468.78 POOL VALVES 172715 31309 5620.6530 REPAIR PARTS EDINBOROUGH PARK 468.78 302746 10/25/2007 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 141.78 COFFEE 172540 406949 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 43.88- CREDIT ON ACCT 172541 894753 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 97.90 302747 10/25/2007 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 372.30 EQUIPMENT REPAIRS 00005937 172329 10025893 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 232.23 MOTOR ASSEMBLY 00001046 172330 10027509 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 604.53 302748 10/25/2007 100642 BANNERS TO GO 15.98 PARK SIGN 00001777 172523 25215 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 15.98 302749 10/25/2007 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 1,051.50 SEWER MODELING 172331 2327G13 -23 5923.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COLLECTION SYSTEMS 1,410.38 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 172332 2327354 -153 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER 9,013.80 SANITARY SEWER COMP PLAN 172478 23271-106 -2 5923.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COLLECTION SYSTEMS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/241200711:32:18 Council Check Register Page - 3 10/23/2007 - 10/25/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 13,266.22 SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE INSPECT 172479 2327G96 -4 5923.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COLLECTION SYSTEMS 568.00 NONDEGRADATION ASSESSMENT 172480 23271-105 -1 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER 25,309.90 302750 10/25/2007 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 48.97 BATTERIES 00001154 172524 18- 189153 5916.6530 REPAIR PARTS METER READING 48.97 302751 10125/2007 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 1,016.75 BATTERIES 00005651 172235 C4155 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,002.50 GOLF CART BATTERIES 00006109 172542 C4139 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 3,019.25 302752 10/25/2007 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 146.10 172393 42493200 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 601.60 172394 42231000 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 169.61 172395 43569700 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 167.95 172603 5592300 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4.90 172604 80013400 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 52.00 172604 80013400 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 60.64 172605 80022500 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 452.80 172606 42511600 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 27.00- 172607 43510000 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,628.60 302753 1012512007 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 300.00 IRRIGATION BLOW OUT 172543 130808 7411.6136 SNOW & LAWN CARE PSTF OCCUPANCY 300.00 302754 10/25/2007 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 55.68 PENCILS, HILIGHTERS 172333 OE- 132419 -1 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 9.79 GLUE STICKS 172544 WO- 475074 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 65.47 302755 10/25/2007 119679 BIXBY PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE 116.30- TOILET SERVICE 172334 7888 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 116.30 TOILET SERVICE 172335 7889 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 116.30 TOILET SERVICE 172336 7890 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 348.90 302756 10125/2007 119431 BLINK BONNIE 142.33 BOX LUNCHES 172545 768 1100.6106 MEETING EXPENSE CITY COUNCIL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/24/200711:32:18 Council Check Register Page - 4 10/23/2007 -- 10/25/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 142.33 302757 10/25/2007 121594 BLOOMINGTON FIRE DEPARTMENT 30.00 MTRS OVERPAYMENT REFUND 172710 101507 4505.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MN TECHNICAL RESCUE SCHOOL 30.00 302758 10/2512007 119631 BONNER & BORHART LLP 14,774.29 PROSECUTING 172546 33611 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 14,774.29 302759 10125/2007 101010 BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY 143.67 TERMINALS 00001134 172236 97051170 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 880.47 FUSEHOLDERS, WIRE 00001134 172237 97051168 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 1,024.14 302760 1012512007 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 367.43 PUMP KIT 00005991 172238 131021 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 165.44 SLACK ADJUSTERS, PINS 00001045 172239 131128 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 175.24 MUFFLER STRAPS 00001041 172240 130891 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 121.29 FITTINGS 00001041 172241 130887X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 37.42 FUEL FILTER 00001042 172242 130594 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 261.46- RETURN 00005988 172243 128445CR 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 605.36 302761 10125/2007 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 4,927.25 CONCRETE/PAVEMENT TESTING 172481 285110 01336.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA336 W70TH - FRANCE TO YORK 4,927.25 302762 10/25/2007 121595 BRECKLE, WILLIAM 15.00 MTRS OVERPAYMENT REFUND 172711 101507 4505.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MN TECHNICAL RESCUE SCHOOL 15.00 302763 10125/2007 100669 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC. 1,355.71 RIP RAP 172547 093007 5422.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,355.71 302764 1012512007 103995 BRYAN, LINDA NELSON 119.75 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 172695 101507 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 119.75 302765 10/2512007 117405 BUNKERT, DENISE 79.30 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 172696 101507 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/24/200711:32:18 Council Check Register Page - 5 10/23/2007 -- 10125/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 79.30 302766 10/2512007 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 51.90 172396 68851 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,162.25 172397 68852 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,359.00 172398 18830 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,573.15 302767 10/25/2007 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 475.00 172399 49231 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 475.00 302768 10/25/2007 100681 CATCO 123.97 FITTINGS, COUPLERS 00005652 172244 17 -05980 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 123.97 302769 10/2512007 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 250.78 ADOBE PRO 8 00004469 172245 HCB4762 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 183.79 MONITOR 00004468 172246 GZL6304 5860.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 58.97 LABELS 00004467 172247 HBS6905 5840.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 631.48 LABEL PRINTER, SOFTWARE 00004467 172248 HBK2538 5840.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 350.36- RMA 004978450 A 4060 172249 GTQ9467 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 774.66 302770 10/25/2007 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. 1,198.39 REBAR, JOINT EXPANSION 00001004 172250 1139639 5912.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDINGS 1,198.39 302771 10125/2007 121592 CERF, CONSTANCE 25.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 172482 101807 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 25.00 302772 10125/2007 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 179.24 CLEANER 00008029 172337 514247 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 179.24 302773 10/25/2007 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 42,873.00 JOINT POWERS 172251 39551 1490.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH 42,873.00 302774 10125/2007 103040 CITY PAGES 80.66 ADVERTISING 172252 100218230 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/24/200711:32:18 Council Check Register Page - 6 10/23/2007 -- 10/25/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 80.66 ADVERTISING 172252 100218230 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 80.68 ADVERTISING 172252 100218230 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 242.00 302775 1012512007 103141 CMI INC. 86.85 MOUTHPIECES 172253 718292 1400.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 86.85 302776 10125/2007 101345 COLOURS 3,103.00 EAC "UNREEL" CAMPAIGN 172548 9841,01 -03 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 1,972.75 OPEN HOUSE MATERIALS 172549 9859,01 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 792.00 CITY GYMS OPEN HOUSE BROCHURES . 172550 9865 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 790.75 "UNCORKED" DESIGN 172551 9855 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 6,658.50 302777 10/25/2007 101395 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 681.48 PLANT INSPECTIONS 172338 PA000147861 01336.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA336 W70TH - FRANCE TO YORK 681.48 302778 10125/2007 121422 COMMUNITY DESIGN GROUP LLC 33,810.00 BETF CONSULTANT 172254 003 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 33,810.00 302779 10125/2007 113429 CONCEPT SEATING INC. 100.00 C -LOOP PADS 172255 11817 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 100.00 302780 10/2512007 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 26.46 SAFETY GLASSES 00001144 172256 03152483 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 199.50 GLOVES 00001165 172339 03156073 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 193.52 GLOVES, EARMUFFS 00001026 172525 03148027 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 451.13 SAFETY GAS CANS 00001026 172525 03148027 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING 870.61 302781 10/25/2007 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 626.55 CLAY 00009221 172483 INV000030729 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 626.55 302782 10125/2007 103800 CORPORATE EXPRESS INC. 1,689.36 OFFICE SUPPLIES 172552 81988413 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,689.36 R55CKREG LOG20000 172400 430590 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 8.80 172401 430593 Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 733.75 172402 430592 10/23/2007 -- 10/25/2007 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 302783 10/25/2007 172404 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,692.55 51.84 114 - 09932336 -1 WATER 172257 879277 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 31.90 51.84 430591 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 302784 10/25/2007 172340 100700 CURTIS 1000 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 24.88 BAKERY 670.69 ENVELOPES 00004074 172553 1899436 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 25.13 BAKERY 670.69 258406 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 302785 10125/2007 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 10/24/200711:32:18 Page - 7 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL (BILLING) 1,573.65 172400 430590 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 8.80 172401 430593 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 733.75 172402 430592 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 198.75 172403 430448 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 72.00 172404 430449 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,692.55 172405 430594 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 31.90 172608 430591 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,311.40 121103 DIRECTV 40.32 TV SERVICE 40.32 302786 10/2512007 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 7,884.40 LEGAL 7,884.40 20.77 PLIER SET 00005992 172258 58819 1553.6556 TOOLS 181.58 HAND TOOLS 00005292 172259 58810 1553.6556 TOOLS 18.46 FLARENUT 00005906 172260 57458 1553.6556 TOOLS 220.81 302787 10125/2007 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 27.57 BAKERY 172340 257988 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 24.88 BAKERY 172341 258015 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 25.13 BAKERY 172554 258406 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 77.58 302788 10/25/2007 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST 18.13 172484 312249850 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 302789 10/25/2007 121103 DIRECTV 40.32 TV SERVICE 40.32 302790 10/25/2007 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 7,884.40 LEGAL 7,884.40 172261 650446982 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GRILL GRILL GRILL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 172555 1438498 1195.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/24/200711:32:18 Council Check Register Page - 8 10/23/2007 — 10/25/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 302791 10/25/2007 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES 348.26 WEAR RINGS 00001011 172263 2,655.51 CHEMICALS 00005905 172262 82701836 -07 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 2,655.51 0034918 -IN 5921.6406 348.26- CREDIT 302792 10/25/2007 100739 EAGLE WINE 0034894 -CM 5921.6406 306.72 1,173.60 172406 672127 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 33.50 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. 172407 668472 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,717.05 425.00 172408 672115 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 393.05 172409 672122 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 302793 10/25/2007 100549 ELECTRIC PUMP INC. 348.26 WEAR RINGS 00001011 172263 0034809 -IN 5921.6530 306.72 WEAR RINGS 00001011 172526 0034918 -IN 5921.6406 348.26- CREDIT 172527 0034894 -CM 5921.6406 306.72 302794 10/25/2007 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. 425.00 ROWAY 172342 14467 1260.6103 425.00 302795 10/25/2007 105824 FLYING CLOUD ANIMAL HOSPITAL 57.69 K9 EXAM 172556 319932 4607.6406 57.69 302796 10/25/2007 118456 FULTON, LAURA 129.00 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 172557 101907 2210.6107 129.00 302797 10/25/2007 108632 GALLES CORPORATION 262.33 BOWL CLEANER 00003512 172264 112242 1470.6511 262.33 302798 10/25/2007 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. 1,455.80 SEPT SERVICE 00005857 172265 7090446 5913.6103 1,455.80 302799 10/2512007 100781 GRAFIX SHOPPE 175.73 GRAPHICS APPLICATION 00001192 172343 55364 1553.6180 175.73 302800 10/25/2007 101103 GRAINGER REPAIR PARTS LIFT STATION MAINT GENERAL SUPPLIES LIFT STATION MAINT GENERAL SUPPLIES LIFT STATION MAINT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS CLEANING SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY OF EDINA 10/24/200711:32:18 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 9 10/23/2007 - 10/25/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 166.52 BALLAST KITS 00001150 172266 9473608744 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 275.29 HAMMERS, SPADING FORKS 00001146 172267 9473242346 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 184.32 HAND TOOLS, PAINT 00001146 172268 9472902577 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 159.46 BATTERIES, TORCHES 00001166 172269 9476204152 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 94.69 BATTERIES 172558 9476385902 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 135.02 BALLASTS, LAMPS 00006327 172559 9468810246 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 124.89 DOOR CLOSER, HEX KEY SET 00006334 172560 9472902569 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 1,140.19 302801 10/2512007 121584 GRAND HAVEN PLASTICS INC. 690.90 STAKES, PINS, SLEEVES 00001131 172270 018603 1343.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BRIDGES GUARD RAILS 690.90 302802 10/25/2007 120201 GRANICUS, INC 779.00 WEBSTREAMING 172561 INV -5016 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 779.00 302803 10/2512007 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 933.50 172410 94742 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 89.75 172411 94708 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 847.75 172609 94873 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 73.75 172610 94874 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,127.00 172611 94893 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,071.75 302804 10/25/2007 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 181.14 LIGHT BULBS 00002193 172716 929016906 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 181.14 302805 10125/2007 101350 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 339.75 IRRIGATION SYST WINTERIZATION 00001178 172271 073571 4091.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GRANDVIEW REVOLVING 493.15 IRRIGATION SYST WINTERIZATION 00001178 172272 073570 4091.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GRANDVIEW REVOLVING 339.75 IRRIGATION SYST WINTERIZATION 00001178 172344 073375 4091.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GRANDVIEW REVOLVING 454.38 IRRIGATION SYS REPAIRS 00001709 172345 073308 05462.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM462 WOODHILL 1,627.03 302807 10/25/2007 100782 GRIGGS COOPER 8 CO. 1,273.80 172412 668470 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 656.19 172413 672123 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 286.38 172414 672124 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 908.77 172415 672125 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,357.65 172416 672120 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanallon 478.70 2,682.41 31.45 119.26 4,346.05 426.68 221.00 - 55.95- 48.97 3,617.51 9,895.40 76.87 1,169.14 102.25 - 84.25- 57.00- 27,854.78 302808 10125/2007 118734 HAGEN, DAVID MICHAEL 66.30 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 66.30 172697 101507 5101.4413 302809 10/25/2007 103314 HARDRIVES INC. 11,552.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 172717 101907 03433.1705.30 23,256.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 172717 101907 04335.1705.30 145,010.75 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 172717 101907 01340.1705.30 179,818.75 302810 1012512007 102618 HARDWOOD CREEK LUMBER INC 409.28 LATHS AND HUBS 00004068 172485 7536 01340.1705.31 409.28 LATHS AND HUBS 00004068 172485 7536 01331.1705.31 818.56 302811 10/2512007 1,985.76 1,985.76 3,971.52 302812 10125/2007 466.08 466.08 100797 HAWKINS INC. TONKAZORB 00001235 172273 1119268 5915.6586 TONKAZORB 00001240 172562 1121196 5915.6586 116838 HAYES INSTRUMENT CO INC BRACKET FOR TRUCK 00004058 172486 518536 1260.6577 10/24/200711:32:18 Page - 10 Subledger Account Description CITY OF EDINA VERNON SELLING Council Check Register VERNON SELLING 10/23/2007 - 10125/2007 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 172417 .670338 5862.5513 172418 672117 5862.5513 172419 672118 5862.5515 172420 668388 5842.5515 172421 670340 5842.5512 172422 670339 5862.5512 172423 734623 5822.5513 172424 734624 5842.5513 172612 672119 5862.5515 172613 672130 5842.5512 172614 672131 5842.5512 172615 672132 5842.5515 172616 672128 5842.5513 172617 735244 5842.5513 172618 735243 5842.5513 172619 735242 5842.5513 172697 101507 5101.4413 302809 10/25/2007 103314 HARDRIVES INC. 11,552.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 172717 101907 03433.1705.30 23,256.00 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 172717 101907 04335.1705.30 145,010.75 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.4 172717 101907 01340.1705.30 179,818.75 302810 1012512007 102618 HARDWOOD CREEK LUMBER INC 409.28 LATHS AND HUBS 00004068 172485 7536 01340.1705.31 409.28 LATHS AND HUBS 00004068 172485 7536 01331.1705.31 818.56 302811 10/2512007 1,985.76 1,985.76 3,971.52 302812 10125/2007 466.08 466.08 100797 HAWKINS INC. TONKAZORB 00001235 172273 1119268 5915.6586 TONKAZORB 00001240 172562 1121196 5915.6586 116838 HAYES INSTRUMENT CO INC BRACKET FOR TRUCK 00004058 172486 518536 1260.6577 10/24/200711:32:18 Page - 10 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 'COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS SS-433 TODD PARK NHOOD CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS -335 TODD PARK NHOOD CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA-340 TODD PARK NHOOD OTHER MATERIALS /SUPPLIES BA-340 TODD PARK NHOOD OTHER MATERIALS /SUPPLIES BA-331 CONCORD: VALLEY VIEW WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT LUMBER ENGINEERING GENERAL 10/24/200711:32:18 Page - 11 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ASSESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS CITY HALL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS GENERAL MAINTENANCE EDINBOROUGH PARK YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 1012312007 - 10/25/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 302813 10/25/2007 100799 HEDBERG AGGREGATES 1,060.21 TOOLS, WALL STONE 00001137 172274 565684 1301.6556 TOOLS 133.56 MORTAR, WALL STONE 00001155 172346 566743 1344.6577 LUMBER 1,193.77 302814 10/25/2007 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 85.60 RADIO ADMIN FEE 172275 27098078 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 980.34 RADIO ADMIN FEE 172276 27098013 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 50.52 TRANSACTION PROCESSING 172563 27097070 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 95.00 TRANSACTION PROCESSING 172563 27097070 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING 1,211.46 302815 10/25/2007 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG 75.00 CHAIR REPAIR 172564 387843 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 55.00 CHAIR REPAIR 172565 387846 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 4,416.66 REMODELING 172566 387844 44005.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 1,986.97- CREDIT 172567 391389 44005.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 2,559.69 302816 10/25/2007 101073 HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES INC. 1,597.75 CONTRACT SERVICES 00005464 172347 252203 -002 1301.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 1,597.75 302817 10/25/2007 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 57.27 SOAP 00002202 172718 2272832 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 57.27 302818 10/25/2007 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 861.00 172620 433612 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 861.00 302819 10125/2007 121404 ISTATE TRUCK CENTER 90.07 STUD WHEELS, NUTS 00001184 172277 C241072236:01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 90.07 302820 10/25/2007 121161 IDEARC MEDIA CORP 133.66 DIRECTORY ADVERTISING 172278 390012350913 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 133.66 DIRECTORY ADVERTISING 172278 390012350913 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 133.68 DIRECTORY ADVERTISING 172278 390012350913 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 401.00 302821 10/25/2007 116191 I NSTY- PRINTS 10/24/200711:32:18 Page - 11 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE RETAINING WALL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ASSESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS CITY HALL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS GENERAL MAINTENANCE EDINBOROUGH PARK YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 172352 881977 5421.5514 CITY OF EDINA GRILL 1,914.37 172425 1116842 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Council Check Register 2,358.30 172621 1116841 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 10/23/2007 — 1012512007 882426 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description YORK SELLING 9,104.74 767.44 COPIES OF BETF REPORT 172279 78208 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 767.44 1,036.74 172426 1333635 302822 10/25/2007 VERNON SELLING 104572 INVISIBLE FENCE CO. OF MN 87.36 REPAIR -6625 SOUTHCREST DR 00001770 172348 102679 05462.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 81.55 REPAIR -6613 WEST SHORE DR 00001771 172349 102786 05462.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 168.91 302823 10125/2007 102640 I PMA -H R 418.23 FIREFIGHTER TEST 172280 24132003 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 418.23 302824 10/25/2007 102024 IRRIGATION BY DESIGN INC. 1,230.93 SPRINKLER REPAIR 172350 00122669 05455.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 1,230.93 302825 10/25/2007 119723 IRRIGATION MANAGEMENT 261.90 SPRINKLER REPAIR 172351 98004 01336.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 261.90 302826 10/25/2007 118322 ITL PATCH COMPANY INC. 263.32 EMBLEM EMBROIDERY 172281 28674 1419.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 263.32 302827 10/25/2007 103067 JENSON, THOMAS 198.00 LUNCH FOR OPEN HOUSE WORKERS 172282 101607 1470.6106 MEETING EXPENSE 198.00 302828 10125/2007 121075 JIMMY'S JOHNNYS INC. 529.39 HOLDING TANK SERVICE 172283 18188 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 529.39 302829 10/25/2007 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 10124/200711:32:18 Page- 12 Business Unit CONTINGENCIES WM-462 WOODHILL WM-462 WOODHILL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL WM-455 SOUTH VIEW TO VALLEY V BA336 W70TH - FRANCE TO YORK RESERVE PROGRAM FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 167.00 172352 881977 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 1,914.37 172425 1116842 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,358.30 172621 1116841 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 313.00 172622 882426 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,352.07 172623 1116848 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 9,104.74 302832 10/25/2007 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1,036.74 172426 1333635 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/23/2007 -10/25/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 151.45 172427 1333631 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE .18 172428 1332874 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 96.08 172429 1332883 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 246.12 172430 1333633 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 905.46 172431 1332876 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 245.80 172432 1330112 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 3,232.89 172433 1332877 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 94.06 172434 1332878 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2,537.25 172435 1332881 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 284.79 172436 1333632 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 151.45 172437 1333630 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 382.80 172438 1330133 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 9.25- 172439 357175 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2.53- 172440 356625 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5.17- 172441 357176 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 603.64 172624 1336485 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 233.98 172625 1336484 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 193.57 172626 1336483 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 92.33 172627 1336487 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 1,052.28 172628 1336486 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 33.07 172629 1336501 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 614.48 172630 1336500 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 1,362.03 172631 1336499 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 63.74 172632 1328531 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 4.32 172633 1336488 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 2,473.81 172634 1336497 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 4,429.37 172635 1336496 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 2,701.35 172636 1336495 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 118.74 172637 1336491 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 461.04 172638 1336490 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,164.68 172639 1336494 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 2,149.97 172640 1336492 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 31.33 172641 1336493 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 97.08 172642 1336489 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 4,927.93 172643 1336502 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 260.44 172644 1336498 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 30.31- 172645 355561 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 7.02- 172646 357627 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 19.17- 172647 357628 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 7.11- 172648 357744 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 32,353.69 10/24/200711:32:18 Page - 13 Business Unit VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/24/200711:32:18 Council Check Register Page - 14 10/23/2007 -- 10/25/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 302833 10/25/2007 111018 KEEPRS INC. 271.99 UNIFORMS 00003520 172284 76680 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 111.97 UNIFORMS 00003514 172285 76284 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 80.99 UNIFORMS 00003511 172286 76285 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 108.61 UNIFORMS 00003505 172287 75552 -02 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,555.65 UNIFORMS 172568 101007 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,129.21 302834 10/25/2007 117142 KNUTSON, KAREN 500.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 172698 101507 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 500.00 302835 10/2512007 120987 KUNDE CONSULTANTS INC. 58.00 OAK WILT INSPECTION 00005921 172487 16311 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 211.50 OAK WILT INSPECTION 00005920 172488 16038 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 656.54 OAK WILT INSPECTION 00005919 172489 16310 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 926.04 302836 10/25/2007 101220 LANO EQUIPMENT INC. 74.40 OIL, FILTER 00002374 172569 172940 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 74.40 302837 10125/2007 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 741.83 CONNECTORS, BOLTS, NUTS 00001135 172288 6119154 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 741.83 302838 10125/2007 100853 LEEF SERVICES 33.15 SHOP TOWELS 172570 1423568 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 33.15 302839 10/2512007 116882 LIPPERT, BARBARA 88.40 ART WORK SOLD AT FAC 172699 101507 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 88.40 302840 10125/2007 100858 LOGIS 1,137.00 172528 28658 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,419.50 172528 28658 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING ADMINISTRATION 2,590.00 172528 28658 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,631.00 172528 28658 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 4,628.00 172528 28658 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 5,039.00 172528 28658 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING GENERAL (BILLING) R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/24/200711:32:18 Council Check Register Page - 15 10/23/2007 - 10/25/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 5,440.50 172528 28658 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 23,885.00 302841 10/25/2007 121591 LOKKESMOE, KENT 28.80 PAVERS FOR NEW APRON 172490 101607 05462.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM-462 WOODHILL 28.80 302842 10/25/2007 101792 LURE -TECH 96.27 GREASE 00005039 172353 1423461 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 96.27 302843 10/25/2007 120766 M & I SUPPLY CO. 183.17 FORESTRY TOOLS 00005902 172491 71679 1644.6556 TOOLS TREES & MAINTENANCE 183.17 302844 10/25/2007 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,997.87 172442 24720 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,997.87 302845 10125/2007 100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 466.17 MASTER CYLINDER, SPRING 00001048 172289 2076641 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 466.17 302846 10/25/2007 120502 MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SOLUTIO 456.89 VIDEO CAMERA 172290 1576 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 456.89 302847 10/25/2007 100868 MARK VII SALES 1,045.55 172443 248458 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,628.40 172444 248794 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 58.20 172445 248479 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING' 36.00 172446 248478 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,748.70 172447 248477 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,263.15 172448 249282 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 614.50 172649 250983 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 49.00 172650 250770 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,061.41 172651 250769 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 11,504.91 302848 10125/2007 101483 MENARDS 20.75 ACRYLIC, DRAWER SLIDE 00001153 172291 77208 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 53.22 LUMBER, GLUE 00001143 172292 75703 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/24/200711:32:18 Council Check Register Page - 16 10/23/2007 -- 10/25/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 4.56 LUMBER 00001159 172354 77530 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 27.03 MAPLE BOARD, LUMBER 00001170 172355 77807 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 49.00 AIR ACCESSORY KIT, FILTERS 00005905 172492 76711 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 300.23 LUMBER 00005900 172493 75734 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 313.88 NAILS, HOUSEWRAP 00005904 172494 76677 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 153.89 SNOW PLOW STAKES 00005909 172529 79053 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 922.56 302849 10125/2007 101987 MENARDS 59.40 ROUNDUP, SOLDERING KIT 00005515 172293 22459 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 30.51 FERTILIZER, BLADES 00002346 172571 23774 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 35.11 WEED KILLER 00002381 172572 20042 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 138.37 PAINTING SUPPLIES 00002379 172573 34754 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 42.40 CLEANER, BATTERIES 00002379 172574 35293 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 107.10 LADDER 00002206 172719 41058 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 412.89 302850 10/25/2007 102281 MENARDS 25.71 PIPE & HOSE CUTTER, ORGANIZER00004071 172356 84537 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 25.71 302851 10125/2007 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 148.89 END ZONE CONES 172495 103510 1621.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES 156.40 FIELD MARKING PAINT 00005898 172496 103328 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 305.29 302852 1012512007 102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 102.00 OFFICIATING FEES 172720 3208 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 102.00 302853 10125/2007 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAI 454.94 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005662 172357 FOCS134217 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 214.28 A/C REPAIRS 00001274 172358 FOCS127221 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 669.22 302854 10/25/2007 116712 METROPOLITAN MEDIA GROUP INC. 335.33 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 172497 13803 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 335.33 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 172497 13803 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 335.34 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 172497 13803 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,006.00 302855 10/25/2007 104650 MICRO CENTER CITY OF EDINA 10124/200711:32:1 B R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 17 10/23/2007 - 10/25/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 76.59 SERIAL CABLES, CABLE TIES 00004470 172294 1545500 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 110.83 172295 1545156 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 110.83- 172296 1545494 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 76.59 302856 10/25/2007 100890 MIDWEST AQUA CARE 5,144.00 2007 SEASON WEED CONTROL 172575 100407 5630.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES 5,144.00 302857 1012512007 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 165.22 ASPHALT 00005909 172359 90177MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 165.22 302858 10/25/2007 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 438.80 172449 0178102204 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 438.80 302859 10/25/2007 103186 MIDWEST FUELS 516.15 DIESEL 00005252 172576 42675 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 573.78 GASOLINE 00006252 172577 42673 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CARS 1,089.93 302860 10/2512007 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,560.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 00001236 172297 33045 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,560.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 00001237 172298 33046 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 3,120.00 302861 10125/2007 102770 MINNESOTA CASTERS INC. 99.25 WHEELS 00005907 172530 INV29576 1648.6530 REPAIR PARTS SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 99.25 302862 10/25/2007 101674 MINNESOTA DEPT OF COMMERCE 591.06 UNCLAIMED PROPERTY 172721 102207 1001.8060 CASH OVER AND UNDER GENERAL FUND REVENUES 591.06 302863 10/25/2007 102137 MINNESOTA ELECTRICAL ASSOCIATI 325.00 CUST ID #12456 00001191 172360 2008 DUES 1280.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD 325.00 302864 10/25/2007 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 668.82 CRS 11 00005905 172361 56315 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 517.59 CSS -1 H 00005905 172362 56266 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 327.30 CITY OF EDINA 3275 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING Council Check Register 172652 3306 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10/23/2007 -- 10/25/2007 704.34 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 1,186.41 302865 10/25/2007 DETENT PARTS 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 596499 -01 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 52.50 FABRICATION 00001043 172299 0074474 -IN 1553.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 302871 40.83 BRASS TIPS, END CAPS 00001126 172363 0074452 -IN 1642.6530 REPAIR PARTS 93.33 885.75 172653 45782 302866 10125/2007 50TH ST SELLING 120996 MOBILE MINI INC. 794.00 172654 45783 5842.5513 599.91 TRAILER RENTAL - OCT 172300 151005332 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 172655 45778 599.91 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,304.50 302867 10/2512007 106190 MOORE, MARY CARROLL 302872 1012512007 108678 NEWMECH COMPANIES INC. 94.60 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 172700 101507 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 9,978.00 EVAPORATIVE CONDENSER 94.60 99 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 302868' 10/25/2007 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 302873 20.77 MOTOR & PUMP 00005996 172301 447530F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 17.71 HOUSING SWITCH 00005995 172531 447525F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 38.48 348.81 302869 10/2512007 117246 MT GLOBAL 10/24/200711:32:18 Page - 18 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIELD MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 327.30 172450 3275 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 377.04 172652 3306 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 704.34 302870 10/2512007 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 446.52 DETENT PARTS 00006106 172578 596499 -01 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 446.52 302871 10/25/2007 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 885.75 172653 45782 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 794.00 172654 45783 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 624.75 172655 45778 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,304.50 302872 1012512007 108678 NEWMECH COMPANIES INC. 9,978.00 EVAPORATIVE CONDENSER 00007188 172579 99 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 9,978.00 302873 10/2512007 120235 NORTH AMERICAN RESCUE PRODUCTS 348.81 TOURNIQUET APPLICATION 172302 IN19339 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 348.81 R55CKREG LOG20000 360.00 CLEANING CITY OF EDINA 172701 101507 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT Council Check Register 360.00 10/23/2007 -- 10125/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 302874 10/25/2007 102652 NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP. 79.11 LABELS, STAPLER 172367 111.98 DEODORIZERS 00001132 172364 5006787 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 149.82 111.98 00002377 172368 403759078 -001 302875 1012512007 ED ADMINISTRATION 100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO. 153.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009216 172498 30.29 MOUNT TIRE, SCRAP DISPOSAL 00001024 172365 NW- 109531 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 22.98 996.55 RECAP TIRES, SCRAP DISPOSAL 00001024 172366 NW- 109517 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 5610.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,026.84 405.16 302876 10/2512007 121551 NYNGAR, BATBAATAR 10/24/200711:32:18 Page - 19 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 360.00 CLEANING 172701 101507 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 360.00 302877 10/25/2007 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 79.11 LABELS, STAPLER 172367 401884813 -001 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 149.82 TONER, CHAIR MAT 00002377 172368 403759078 -001 5610.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION 153.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009216 172498 401166247 -001 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 22.98 THERMAL PAPER 172722 404305296 -001 5610.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION 405.16 302878 10/2512007 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 38.93 TOWELS, WIRE 00001168 172369 471098 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 163.50 FILTERS 00001167 172370 471408 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 202.43 302879 10/25/2007 117993 P & H SERVICES 49.05 RADAR REPAIR 172580 12243 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 49.05 302880 10/25/2007 102440 PASS, GRACE 88.40 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 172702 101507 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 88.40 302881 10/2512007 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 1,261.80 172656 8161963 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 89.00 172657 8162129 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,788.79 172658 8161955 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,643.84 172659 8161957 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 181.00- 172660 8161374 -CM 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6,602.43 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/24/200711:32:18 Council Check Register Page - 20 10/23/2007 - 10/25/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 302882 1012512007 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 380.00 172371 15151109 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 380.00 302883 10/25/2007 100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS 1,635.00 REMOVE /REPLACE SOD 172372 100507 01332.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA-332 S. LAKE CORNELIA NBHOOD 1,286.00 PLANTS FOR LANDSCAPING 172373 OCT507 01340.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA-340 TODD PARK NHOOD OTHER 2,921.00 302884 10/2512007 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 943.40 172451 2522643 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 592.71 172452 2522645 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 83.79 172453 2523180 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 196.32 172454 2523181 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 33.30 172455 2520432 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 284.98 172661 2525584 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,663.59 172662 2525583 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 308.17 172663 2525590 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,046.68 172664 2525586 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 196.64 172665 2525587 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,541.98 172666 2525585 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,341.90 172667 2523179 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,070.15 172668 2525589 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,726.16 172669 2525588 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6.42- 172670 3370993 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 14,023.35 302885 10/2512007 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 735.72 TIRES, SERVICE 00001172 172303 437430 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 735.72 302886 10/2512007 102884 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN 66.34 MOWER REPAIR 00002380 172581 116906 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES 367.11 REPAIRS TO TRIMMERS 00002380 172582 116905 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES 433.45 302887 1012512007 100964 PRECISION TURF & CHEMICAL 1,996.88 WINTER FUNGICIDE 172583 30340 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,996.88 302888 10/25/2007 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 377.80 172456 672126 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 568.66 193.00 1,139.46 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/23/2007 - 10/25/2007 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 172457 672116 5862.5513 172458 672121 5822.5513 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 10/24/200711:32:18 Page- 21 Business Unit VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 302889 10/25/2007 100971 QUALITY WINE 787.58 172459 921658 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,367.80 172460 921711 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 333.76 172461 921425 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,476.65 172462 921709 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 988.60 172463 921424 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,936.23 172464 921657 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,911.60 172465 921708 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,250.97 172466 921423 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 27.99- 172467 918381 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 199.00 172671 921710 -00 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,142.26 172672 921656 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 897.30 172673 921645 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,926.50 172674 921660 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 15.50- 172675 919681 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10.94- 172676 919679 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 9.00- 172677 919720 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 22.00- 172678 921319 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 20.67- 172679 921309 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 18.00- 172680 918844 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 20,094.15 302890 10/2512007 101965 QWEST 104.22 952 451 -6058 172304' 6058 -10/07 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 104.22 302891 1012512007 100972 R &R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN 1 496.09 U- JOINTS FOR 2AMBONI 00008022 172374 28830 5521.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA ICE MAINT 496.09 302892 10/25/2007 118658 RIGHTWAY GLASS INC. 205.40 GLASS REPLACEMENT 00005669 172375 46513 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 205.40 302893 10/2512007 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 31.57 TOW CONNECTORS 00001044 172305 1357752 -01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 31.57 R55CKREG LOG20000 137,970.00 CITY OF EDINA APPL 6 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION Council Check Register 137,970.00 10/23/2007 -- 10/25/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 302894 10/2512007 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 22.08 SOFTENER SALT 00003648 172306 00198509 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS 274.04 SOFTENER SALT 00006341 172584 00198917 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES WANDS 00001173 172308 296.12 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 302895 10/25/2007 121106 ROCHON CORPORATION 10/24/200711:32:18 Page- 22 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CLUB HOUSE 137,970.00 FIREHOUSE RENOVATION 172723 APPL 6 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 137,970.00 302896 10/25/2007 100985 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQ CO INC 82.05 ROCKER SWITCH 00005984 172307 C47954 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 130.11 WANDS 00001173 172308 C48083 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 212.16 302897 10/25/2007 100987 SA-AG INC 695.92 SAND AND ROCK 00001234 172309 55773 5913.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK DISTRIBUTION 695.92 302898 10/25/2007 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 147.19 CHANGE OUT PARTS WASHER 00001174 172310 0034973241 1553.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 147.19 302899 10125/2007 119478 SAFETY MEETING OUTLINES INC. 43.00 CONSTR/MAINT DAILY LOG 172499 101807 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 43.00 302900 10/25/2007 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 25.85 BAKERY 172376 197264 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 25.85 302901 10/25/2007 118168 SANSIO 1,066.78 EMS SUBSCRIPTION 172311 INV008104 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,066.78 302902 1012512007 100990 SCHARBER & SONS 61.24 VOLTAGE REGULATOR 00001049 172312 386862 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 156.02 PARTS MANUAL 00005899 172532 386864 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 217.26 302903 10/2512007 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 51.05 LUMBER, NAILS 00001127 172377 40546827 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 53.04 LUMBER 00001034 172378 40545645 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # bate Amount Supplier/ Explanation CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10123/2007 -- 10/25/2007 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 10124/200711:32:18 Page - 23 Business Unit 1470.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5913.6103 104.09 DISTRIBUTION 01337.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT 302904 10/25/2007 01338.1705.24 101577 SCHMOLL, RUTH BA -338 SOUTHDALE 1ST ADDITION 01331.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 82.50 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 172313 101607 04297.1705.20 82.50 PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO ST 05436.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 302905 10/25/2007 01213.1705.20 100995 SEH PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO 03413.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 1,016.97 WATER PORTIO FOR COMP PLAN 172379 0169018 03435.1705.24 17,871.97 WOODHILL RECONSTRUCTION 172500 0168080 COLLECTION SYSTEMS 3,205.80 SOUTHDALE RECONSTRUCTION 172501 0168081 451.82 FED FLASHER DESIGN 172502 0168144 1,172.18 FEASIBILITY REPORT 172503 0168079 3,282.10 FEASIBILITY REPORT 172503 0168079 5,860.89 FEASIBILITY REPORT 172503 0168079 6,329.75 FEASIBILITY REPORT 172503 0168079 6,798.62 FEASIBILITY REPORT 172503 0168079 2,748.70 CIPP 172504 0168082 2,748.71 CIPP 172504 0168082 17,444.87 MANHOLE INSPECTION 172505 0167841 68,932.38 302906 10/2512007 102870 SEIFERT, ELIZABETH 63.70 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 172703 101507 63.70 302907 10/25/2007 102995 SHAPCO PRINTING INC. 511.20 NEWSLETTER 172585 154777 -01 511.20 302908 10125/2007 102935 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION INC 368.97 ICE MAKER REPAIR 00006340 172380 62979 368.97 302909 10/25/2007 117362 SOUTHWEST PAVING INC 16,099.00 #12 CART PATH 00006141 172586 377 16,099.00 302910 10125/2007 105193 SPAIN, MARK 2,225.32 STUMP GRINDING, 00005954 172506 100507 2,225.32 302911 10/2512007 116682 SPECIALTY WINES & BEVERAGES 10124/200711:32:18 Page - 23 Business Unit 1470.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 01337.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT BA -337 WOODHILL NEIGHBORHOOD 01338.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT BA -338 SOUTHDALE 1ST ADDITION 01331.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA -331 CONCORD: VALLEY VIEW 08043.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN L -03 COUNTRY CLUB 04297.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO ST 05436.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO WM 01213.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO 03413.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO SS 03436.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT SS-436 COUNTRYSIDE RD 03435.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT SS -435 ARDEN AVE 5923.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COLLECTION SYSTEMS 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 2210.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL 5422.6251 SHARED MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/24/200711:32:18 Council Check Register Page - 24 10/23/2007 - 10/25/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,441.50 172468 17777 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 113.00- 172681 17727 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,328.50 302912 1012512007 103658 ST. LOUIS PARK COMMUNITY BAND 75.00 PERFORMANCE 11/04/07 172521 101807 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 75.00 302913 1012512007 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 3,493.48 HELP WANTED ADS 172724 093007 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 3,493.48 302914 10/25/2007 101015 STREICHERS 255.57 FUSES 172587 1466995 1400.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 175.71 GUN CLEANER 172588 1466172 1400.6104 CONFERENCES S SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 431.28 302915 10125/2007 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 89.99 MIRRORS 00005654 172314 510527 -1 CVW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 976.34 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00005660 172381 CTCB527873 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 930.00 TRACTOR REPAIRS 00005916 172507 CTCB527674 1646.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,211.59 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00001275 172508 CTCB525494 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5,537.51 VEHICLE REPAIRS 00001276 172725 CVCB525680 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 9,745.43 302916 10/25/2007 110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO 56.33 RADIO REPAIR 00001179 172315 19338 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 315.17 NEXTEL BATTERIES 00001315 172533 19356 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 371.50 302917 10125/2007 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 398.00 172469 685631 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 410.00 172682 685647 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 808.00 302918 10/25/2007 120560 SWEE, CINDY 78.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 172704 101507 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 78.00 302919 10125/2007 120595 T- MOBILE 51.62 SURVEYING PHONE 172382 092707 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 51.62 CITY OF EDINA 10/24/200711:32:18 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 25 10/23/2007 -- 10/25/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 302920 10/2512007 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 37.00 BEERLINE SERVICE 172383 275943 5421.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GRILL 37.00 302921 10125/2007 108509 TAFFEE, MARY 206.05 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 172705 101507 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 206.05 302922 10/25/2007 113549 TENNIS WEST 6,741.45 RESURFACE TENNIS COURTS 00005805 172509 07 -801 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 6,741.45 302923 10/25/2007 118157 TESSCOINC. 92.78 CONVERTER 00001164 172534 794176 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 92.78 302924 10/2512007 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 174.00 172589 29364 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5,378.30 172683 466114 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 43.05 172684 466115 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5,595.35 302925 10/25/2007 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 23.59 OXYGEN 00001141 172316 189331 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 146.46 MACHINE REPAIR 00005655 172535 189870 1553.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 170.05 302926 10/25/2007 118704 TOWNSHEND, SCHUYLER 19.11 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 172590 101907 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 19.11 302927 10125/2007 103153 TREUTING, KRISTEN 65.65 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 172706 101507 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 65.65 302928 10/25/2007 116302 TRI -ANIM HEALTH SERVICES INC 286.11 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003857 172317 MMH72707600 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 286.11 302929 10/25/2007 101403 TRUCK BODIES & EQUIP INTL INC 485.96 CYLINDER 00001047 172318 42546 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1 0/24/20 0 71 1:32:18 Council Check Register Page - 26 10/23/2007 -- 10125/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 485.96 302930 10125/2007 100682 TRUGREEN - CHEMLAWN 63.99 FERTILIZE 00005915 172510 549314 1643.6540 FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE 47.99 FERTILIZE 00005914 172511 543188 1643.6540 FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE 475.00 FERTILIZE 00005912 172512 550604 1643.6540 FERTILIZER GENERAL TURF CARE 143.98 FERTILIZE 00005913 172513 546046 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 527.92 FERTILIZE 00005913 172514 550602 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 1,258.88 302931 10/2512007 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 159.92 FUEL PUMP 00006111 172591 T117948 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 159.92 302932 10125/2007 102255 TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO 119.88 OXYGEN 00003649 172319 407994 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 119.88 302933 10/25/2007 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 1,110.26 SEED MIXTURE 00006150 172592 17935 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,110.26 302934 10/25/2007 102071 U.S. IDENTIFICATION MANUAL 82.50 USID MANUAL UPDATES 172320 149042 1400.6405 BOOKS & PAMPHLETS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 82.50 302935 10/25/2007 121477 ULTIMATE OFFICE 471.42 FILE CABINET 00002187 172726 P098568201014 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 471.42 302936 10/2512007 102104 UNDIS, PAT 194.55 WORKSHOP SUPPLIES 172707 101507 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 500.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 172707 101507 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 694.55 302937 10/2512007 100668 URS CORPORATION 7,519.00 COMP PLAN CONSULTING 172727 3054983 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 7,519.00 302938 10/25/2007 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. 360.73 PAGERS 172321 Q0319246J 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 10.98 PAGER 172593 Q6096083J 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/23/2007 - 10/2512007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1470.6406 371.71 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 302939 10/2512007 GENERAL SUPPLIES 101058 VAN PAPER CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 5862.6512 83.87 PLATES 00003508 172322 055321 -01 120.26 UTENSILS 00003508 172323 055321 -00 408.23 BAGS 172324 055939 -00 77.89 CAN LINERS 00005815 172384 054530 -01 44.65 GLOVES, PLATES, UTENSILS 00007513 172594 055941 -00 625.32 BAGS, TOWELS 00007513 172594 055941 -00 106.97 BAGS 00007513 172595 055941 -01 26.74 BAGS 172596 055939 -01 1,493.93 302940 10/25/2007 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS 2.71 172728 1769184588 27.49 172728 1769184588 39.48 172728 1769184588 40.25 172728 1769184588 106.73 172728 1769184588 128.39 172728 1769184588 371.35 172728 1769184588 716.40 302941 10/2512007 121596 VERMEERSCH, CHAD 15.00 MTRS OVERPAYMENT REFUND 172712 101507 15.00 302942 10125/2007 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 183.90 WIRE, HUBS 172597 33957 255.60 CLUB COVERS 00006147 172598 33967 439.50 302943 10/25/2007 101064 VESSCO INC. 73.69 INJECTOR 00005760 172385 40670 73.69 302944 10/25/2007 101932 VOTH, BART 244.41 UNIFORM PURCHASE 172729 102207 244.41 • 302945 10/25/2007 121597 WAGNER, SHARON 81.25 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 172708 101507 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 1645.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 5420.6188 TELEPHONE 1190.6188 TELEPHONE 1120.6188 TELEPHONE 1490.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1600.6188 TELEPHONE 1640.6188 TELEPHONE 1470.6188 TELEPHONE 4505.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10/24/200711:32:18 Page- 27 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING LITTER REMOVAL VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING CLUB HOUSE ASSESSING ADMINISTRATION PUBLIC HEALTH PARK ADMIN. GENERAL PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL MN TECHNICAL RESCUE SCHOOL 5423.6530 REPAIR PARTS GOLF CARS 5423.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CARS 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS POOL OPERATION 5913.6201 LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10123/2007 - 10/25/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 10/24/200711:32:18 Page - 28 Business Unit PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 81.25 302946 10/2512007 101328 WALBRIDGE, DAVID 150.00 PERFORMANCE 11/01/07 172520 101807 5610.6136 150.00 302947 10/25/2007 121042 WALLACE CARLSON PRINTING 610.43 WORKSHOP BROCHURE 00009243 172515 14597 5110.6564 610.43 302948 10125/2007 106699 WALSER CHRYSLER JEEP 7.03 A/C KNOB 00005994 172325 1397698CHW 1553.6530 7.03 302949 1012512007 117074 WEIERKE, DAVID 134.97 UNIFORM PURCHASE 172599 101907 1646.6201 134.97 302950 1012512007 101076 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT 156.11 SWITCH REPAIRS 00001193 172386 0035373 -IN 1553.6180 156.11 302951 10/25/2007 114588 WILSON, ROBERT C. 1,089.50 IAAO CONFERENCE EXPENSE 172600 101907 1190.6104 1,089.50 302952 10125/2007 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 1,586.99 172685 177408 -00 5842.5513 553.77 172686 177413 -00 5822.5513 1,343.77 172687 177531 -00 5862.5513 3,484.53 302953 10125/2007 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 167.66 172470 207494 5862.5513 6.90- 172471 35110 5822.5513 6.67- 172472 35111 5822.5513 7.33- 172473 35125 5822.5513 1,107.88 172688 208131 5862.5513 1,263.07 172689 208133 5862.5513 570.23 172690 - 208129 5822.5513 97.08 172691 208130 5842.5513 1,164.36 172692 208132 5842.5513 10/24/200711:32:18 Page - 28 Business Unit PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/24/200711:32:18 Council Check Register Page - 29 10/23/2007 — 10/25/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 4,349.38 302954 10/2512007 117482 WINECONNECT INC. 2,990.52 WIRE KIOSK 172326 216 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 2,990.52 302955 10/25/2007 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 607.50 172474 201266 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,914.50 172693 201352 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 214.00 172694 201421 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,736.00 302956 10/25/2007 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 29,260.00 GATEWAY AUAR 172387 3- 6/20/07 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 586.25 STORM SEWER & WATERMAIN 172388 2- 09/25/07 05474.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM-474 W70TH WATERMAIN IMP 586.25 STORM SEWER & WATERMAIN 172388 2 -09/25/07 04339.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS -339 W70TH STORM IMP 610.00 TRAFFIC REVIEW 172389 4- 9/21107 1265.6103. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION 572.00 2006 MS4 /SWPPP 172516 5- 9/25107 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER 20,328.25 TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE 172517 B- 9/21/07 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 35,726.75 ROUNDABOUTS 172536 7- 9/25/07 01336.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT BA336 W70TH - FRANCE TO YORK 87,669.50 302957 10125/2007 101726 XCEL ENERGY 8,322.82 51- 6955679 -8 172518 128744705 1551.6185 LIGHT & POWER CITY HALL GENERAL 34.24 51- 5276505 -8 172519 128708409 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 3,254.52 51- 6227619 -3 172730 128394519 5630.6185 LIGHT & POWER CENTENNIAL LAKES 11,611.58 302958 10/25/2007 103584 XPEDX 467.31 CITY LETTERHEAD 172601 N347979311 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 467.31 302959 10/25/2007 118994 ZAMORA, DAWN 156.65 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 172709 101507 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 156.65 302960 10/25/2007 101572 ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC 1,986.23 GUTTER BROOMS 00005401 172390 114205 1310.6523 BROOMS STREET CLEANING 1,986.23 302961 10/25/2007 101675 DESHLER, BRANDON 700.00 COBRA REFUND 172780 102207 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/23/2007 -- 10/25/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 700.00 302962 10/25/2007 121599 BLUE VALLEY BUILDERS INC. 26,715.00 CHOWEN PK SHELTER RENOVATION 172781 2049 47044.6710 26,715.00 1,294,874.30 Grand Total Subledger Account Description Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,294,874.30 Total Payments 1,294,874.30 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT e�' 10/24/200711:32:18 Page- 30 Business Unit CHOWEN PK PICNIC SHELTER R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 249,627.08 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 8,096.81 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 566,758.36 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 2,496.10 05100 ART CENTER FUND 4,259.48 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 73.69 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 26,805.45 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 28,896.78 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 10,836.27 05800 LIQUOR FUND 173,658.72 05900 UTILITY FUND 137,056.38 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 85,914.49 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 394.69 Report Totals 1,294,874.30 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 10/23/2007 - 10/25/2007 We confirm to the best of owknowledge and belief, that these claims comply In all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing poll nd as a proc dwo 10/24/200711:34:12 Page- 1 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Council Check Register Page - 1 10126/2007 - 11/1/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 302963 10/26/2007 121607 ENGINEERED BUILDING COMPONENTS 845.98 TRUSSES 00001083 172925 DB19963 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 845.98 302964 11/1/2007 118536 A &B AUTO ELECTRIC INC. 96.84 FIELDS AND POST KIT 00001334 172827 50534 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 96.84 302965 1111/2007 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 30.04 172782 609851 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 65.64 172783 609853 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 67.64 173071 609854 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 163.32 302966 1111/2007 100616 ACTION MAILING SERVICES INC. 319.01 MAIL PROCESSING 172739 207133 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 516.32 MAIL PROCESSING 172926 207205 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 835.33 302967 11/1/2007 100617 ADAM'S PEST CONTROL 95.87 PEST CONTROL 00006350 172828 413455 5421.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GRILL 95.87 302968 11/1/2007 101441 ADECCO EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 505.00 UB TEMP 172829 63646163 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 505.00 302969 1111/2007 102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES 479.97 READY MIX 00005902 172830 4206688 1365.6520 CONCRETE SIDEWALKS & PATH MAINTENANCE 479.97 302970 11/1/2007 100620 AIM ELECTRONICS 12,993.00 SCOREBOARD 00007185 172831 31460 -A 1647.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 12,993.00 302971 11/1/2007 121604 AKHTAR, JAMIEL 236.63 CREDIT ON ACCT 20134400903 172927 102507 5900.1211.1 ACCTS RECEIVABLE MANUAL UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 236.63 302971" 11/1/2007 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC. 250.95 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 172928 ALERTINV09340 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 250.95 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/3112007 8:10:05 Council Check Register Page - 2 10/26/2007 - 11/1/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 302973 11/1/2007 100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN 552.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 173129 102607 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 552.00 302974 11/112007 100630 ANCHOR PAPER CO. INC. 43.89 COMPUTER PAPER 172832 10130279 -00 5820.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 87.78 COMPUTER PAPER 172832 10130279 -00 5860.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 131.67 COMPUTER PAPER 172832 10130279 -00 5840.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 263.34 302975 11/1/2007 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 53.25 BEARINGS 00001056 172740 10027767 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 53.25 302976 11/112007 121605 ASPHALT & CONCRETE BUY KNOX IN 40.00 PERMIT REFUND 172929 CC07 -53 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 40.00 302977 11/1/2007 104069 B.B. WATSON GRAPHIC DESIGN 230.04 BUSINESS CARDS 172930 443 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 230.04 302978 11/1/2007 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. 31.95 BATTERY 00001324 172741 C4156 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 31.95 302979 11/112007 121600 BAYPOINTE ENTERPRISES INC. 849.95 REDWOOD TREE BENCH 00006296 172833 BGC1 -9 -07 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 900.00 REDWOOD TREE BENCH 00006296 172833 BGC1 -9 -07 5400.2072 MEN'S CLUB GOLF BALANCE SHEET 1,749.95 302980 11/1/2007 121602 BEAUPRE AERIAL EQUIPMENT 740.00 BOOM LIFT RENTAL 00008024 172834 44059 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 740.00 302981 1111/2007 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 14.96 172784 41917200 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 240.00 172785 42295000 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 385.20 172786 42553600 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 140.10 172882 42507000 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,139.06 173072 42511500 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 302982 11/112007 Amount Supplier / Explanation 3,818.80 12.05 96.00 " 128.02 86.15 CALENDARS 30.48- 172742 288.50 1190.6406 6,318.36 ASSESSING 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 864.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 864.00 172835 PO # Doc No 173073 173074 173075 173075 173076 173077 173078 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/26/2007 - 11/1/2007 Inv No Account No 42441000 5842.5513 43569600 5842.6406 80018300 5842.6406 80018300 5842.5515 80041900 5862.5515 80024500 5862.5515 42575800 5822.5513 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Page - 3 Business Unit YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 173130 102607 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 302983 11/1/2007 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 40.32 CALENDARS 172742 WO- 475822 -1 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 36.25 OFFICE SUPPLIES 172835 WO- 473027 -1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 16.93 OFFICE SUPPLIES 172836 WO- 475837 -1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 11.17 PENS 00001336 172837 WO- 475373 -1 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 72.06 CALENDARS 00001333 172838 WO. 472962 -1 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 41.61 TAGS, PAPER 00001335 172839 WO- 475044 -1 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1.68- CREDIT 172931 CP -WO- 471610 -1 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 73.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES 172932 OE- 133079 -1 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 41.92 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001349 172995 WO- 476193 -1 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 331.86 302984 11/1/2007 100711 BLOOD, DAVID 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 172733 110107 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 302985 11/1/2007 103879 BLOOMINGTON RENTAL CENTER 86.74 PAINT SPRAYER RENTAL 00002383 172840 49454 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 86.74 302986 111112007 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 63.90- CREDIT 00005739 172933 126963CR 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 493.31- CREDIT 00001041 172934 129798CR 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 7.56 LAMPS 00001054 172935 39915SAV 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 7.88 LAMPS 00001054 172936 134408 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 593.57 BELTS, BRAKES, GASKETS 00001058 172937 135871 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 51.80 302987 11/1/2007 100663 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Council Check Register Page - 4 10/26/2007 -- 11/1/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 22.27 PETTY CASH 172996 102507 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 40.00 PETTY CASH 172996 102507 5410.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 54.44 PETTY CASH 172996 102507 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 70.62 PETTY CASH 172996 102507 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 82.00 PETTY CASH 172996 102507 5410.6235 POSTAGE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 269.33 302988 11/1/2007 100873 BROCKWAY, MAUREEN 441.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 173131 102607 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 441.00 302989 1111/2007 117405 BUNKERT, DENISE 404.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 173132 102607 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 546.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 173132 102607 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 950.00 302990 11/1/2007 103244 BURTIS, ROBERT 175.00 PERFORMANCE 1118/07 172997 103007 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 175.00 302991 1111/2007 100776 BUTLER, GEORGE 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 172732 110107 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 302992 11/1/2007 121521 CABELA'S MKTG & BRAND MGT INC. 62.87 UNIFORM PURCHASE 00005911 172998 0637400 -01 1640.6201 LAUNDRY PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 62.87 302993 11/1/2007 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET 72.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 173133 102607 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY 324.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 173133 102607 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 396.00 302994 1111/2007 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 789.50 172787 68909 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,787.55 172788 18898 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5,577.05 302995 1111/2007 100681 CATCO 1,079.33 FITTINGS, HOSE 00005657 172938 17 -06071 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 100.36 PUMP & MOTOR 00001344 172939 3 -39325 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,179.69 I CITY OF EDINA R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register 10/26/2007 -- 11/1/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 302996 11/1/2007 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 80.75 MEMORY FOR PRINTER 00004472 172743 HDB7818 1495.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 80.75 302997 11/1/2007 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 15.23 5596524 -8 172841 101607 5430.6186 HEAT 2,718.68 5591458 -4 172940 101907 1551.6186 HEAT 27.45 5590919 -6 173000 OCT1907 7411.6186 HEAT 347.10 5584304 -9 173001 OCT1607 7411.6186 HEAT 10.12 5584310 -6 173002 10 -16 -2007 7411.6186 HEAT 3,118.58 302998 11/1/2007 105038 CENTRAL MN TREE SERVICE LLC 1,810.50 ELM TREE REMOVAL 00005744 172744 4121 W 50TH 4088.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 852.00 ELM TREE REMOVAL 00005745 172745 6929 W RD 4088.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,810.50 ELM TREE REMOVAL 00005746 172746 5017 INDIANOLA 4088.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,473.00 302999 1111/2007 116353 CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS INC. 377.38 PUBLIC HEARING ENVELOPES 172941 17765 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 377.38 303000 11/112007 118768 CITY OF MAPLE GROVE 875.00 SUPERVISION TRAINING 172942 10730 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 875.00 303001 1111/2007 103040 CITY PAGES 223.66 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 172842 100217854 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 223.66 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 172842 100217854 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 223.68 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 172842 100217854 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 671.00 303002 11/112007 116304 CLAY, DON 740.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 173134 102607 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 740.00 303003 11/1/2007 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 11,018.96 ASPHALT 00005899 172747 101507 1314.6518 BLACKTOP 11,018.96 303004 1111/2007 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Page- 5 Business Unit INSPECTIONS RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CITY HALL GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY TREE REMOVAL TREE REMOVAL TREE REMOVAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING MEDIA STUDIO STREET RENOVATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/26/2007 - 11/1/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 235.80 GLOVES 00001181 172843 03157847 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 236.57 GLOVES 00001321 172999 03161187 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5913.6180 5822.5514 5822.5515 5842.5514 5862.5515 5862.5514 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Page - 6 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING DISTRIBUTION COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 472.37 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 303005 11/112007 VERNON SELLING 117387 DATARADIO CDR LTD 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 5430.6188 1,200.00 SCADA RADIO SERVICE 00005850 173003 10000989 CLUB HOUSE 1,200.00 303006 111112007 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 926.80 172789 431359 8.80 172790 431360 2,037.15 172791 431361 19.80 173079 431358 1,402.45 173080 431357 4,395.00 303007 1111/2007 100713 DAY - TIMERS INC. 37.27 DESK REFILL 173004 57135949 37.27 303008 11/1/2007 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 42.34 BAKERY 172844 258488 41.88 BAKERY 172845 258559 39.16 BAKERY 173005 258688 29.62 BAKERY 173006 259001 153.00 303009 11H/2007 118375 DEPAUL LETTERING 80.00 POLO SHIRTS 172943 2765 80.00 303010 1111/2007 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST 474.00 172944 312390292 18.98 172945 312390383 18.98 172945 312390383 18.99 172945 312390383 133.50 172946 312390227 639.00 172946 312390227 4,035.00 172946 312390227 5,338.45 303011 1111/2007 117435 DUNCAN, PATRICIA 5913.6180 5822.5514 5822.5515 5842.5514 5862.5515 5862.5514 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Page - 6 Business Unit CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING DISTRIBUTION COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5610.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 5430.6188 TELEPHONE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE R65CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Councll Check Register 10/26/2007 — 11/1/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 56.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 173135 102607 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10131/2007 8:10:05 Page - 7 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GENERAL STORM SEWER COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES BRIDGES GUARD RAILS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT BRAEMAR PARK SHELTER CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL STORM SEWER CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIBER OPTIC CABLING 56.00 FIBER OPTIC CABLING CONSTR. IN PROGRESS WM -465 SCADA UPGRADES CONSULTING INSPECTION LS36 LIFT STATION #6 303012 11IW2007 100359 E. J. MAYERS INC. 2,000.00 INSTALL STORM PIPE 00001243 172846 1020 5932.6180 2,000.00 303013 11/1/2007 100739 EAGLE WINE 1,656.30 172792 675813 5662.5513 281.15 172883 675816 5822.5513 1,013.30 173081 675819 5842.5513 2,950.75 303014 11/1/2007 100740 EARL F. ANDERSEN INC. 366.63 STEEL BANDING 00001370 172947 0079988 -IN 1343.6406 1,990.49 PICNIC TABLES 00007195 173007 0080008 -IN 47052.6710 2,357.12 303015 111112007 118010 EGAN, BILL 722.25 BEAVER REMOVAL 00001245 172847 102107 5932.6180 722.25 303016 11/1/2007 119352 EHRESMANN, DANIEL 173.51 TRAINING EXPENSES 173008 102507 1281.6104 173.51 303017 1111/2007 121598 ELERT & ASSOCIATES 4,270.18 FIBRE PROJECT 2007 172748 0156187 46001.6710 1,698.75 FIBRE PROJECT 2007 172749 0156251 46001.6710 5,968.93 303018 11/1/2007 106194 EMA INC. 6,640.00 SCADA UPGRADES 172948 5604 - 90012374 05465.1705 1,540.00 SCADA SYSTEM SUPPORT 173009 5604 - 90012375 10036.1705.21 8,180.00 303019 111112007 105944 EMANUEL, LOU 23.25 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 173010 102907 4077.6103 23.25 303020 11/1/2007 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 80.39 SILICONE SEALS 00005999 172949 6- 982199 1553.6530 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 10131/2007 8:10:05 Page - 7 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GENERAL STORM SEWER COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES BRIDGES GUARD RAILS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT BRAEMAR PARK SHELTER CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL STORM SEWER CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIBER OPTIC CABLING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIBER OPTIC CABLING CONSTR. IN PROGRESS WM -465 SCADA UPGRADES CONSULTING INSPECTION LS36 LIFT STATION #6 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/26/2007 — 11/1/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 80.39 303021 11/1/2007 113876 FAMILY TIMES INC. 445.00 ADVERTISING 00009168 173011 9168 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Page- 8 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION LAUNDRY PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION WEB DEVELOPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 445.00 303022 11/112007 100756 FEDERAL EXPRESS 65.57 SHIPPING CHARGES 172950 2- 330 -26035 1400.6406 65.57 303023 11/112007 115375 FILING STORE, THE 20.11 2008 BANDS FOR RECORDS 172951 13391 1400.6406 20.11 303024 11/112007 104474 FILTERFRESH 377.13 COFFEE 00001319 172750 2008 - 79470529 1552.6103 377.13 303025 111112007 103985 FLOR, JON 925.00 AD DESIGN 172952 2064 2210.6103 925.00 303026 11/112007 103039 FREY, MICHAEL 4,030.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 173136 102607 5110.6103 4,030.00 303027 111112007 101270 GANDER MOUNTAIN 140.96 WORK BOOTS 00005761 172953 489 -21 -2256 1640.6201 140.96 303028 11/112007 101867 GETSINGER, DONNA 192.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 173137 102607 5110.6103 192.00 303029 11/1/2007 119936 GLOBAL OAK 1,012.50 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 172751 441 2210.6124 1,012.50 303030 11/1/2007 114710 GORSE, SHERRY 81.97 KEY COPIES 173138 102607 5110.6406 81.97 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Page- 8 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION LAUNDRY PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION WEB DEVELOPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Council Check Register Page - 9 10/26/2007 - 11/1/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 303031 11/112007 102645 GRAFFITI CONTROL SERVICES 102.24 GRAFFITI REMOVAL 00005926 172752 131 1646.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 102.24 303032 11/112007 101103 GRAINGER 7.84 DRILL BITS 00001314 172753 9480330423 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 21.98 LAMP HOLDERS, SCRUBS 00001314 172753 9480330423 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 119.77 PAINT, BRUSHES 00001189 172754 9479820103 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 101.38 PLIERS, PHOTOCONTROL 00008030 172848 9480330415 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 29.85 BALLASTS 00006340 172849 9477308556 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 154.62 DEGREASER, SEALANT 00001322 173012 9482991693 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 435.44 303033 11/1/2007 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 85.75 172884 95110 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 517.00 173082 95115 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 602.75 303034 11/112007 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 50.15 CELL PHONE CHARGES 173013 102907 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 50.15 303035 11/1/2007 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 2,619.00 CREDIT CARD LESSONS 173014 102507 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 2,619.00 303036 1111/2007 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 2.10 172793 668181 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,563.10 172794 675817 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 113.14 172795 675711 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 465.11 172796 675710 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,851.69 172797 675814 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,417.23 172798 675712 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,329.25 172885 675820 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5.25 172886 675574 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 193.60 172887 675716 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 517.57 172888 676519 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,630.01 172889 673872 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4.20 172890 673873 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,537.05 172891 675714 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,950.21 172892 675715 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1.05- 172893 735752 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Council Check' Register Page - 10 10/26/2007 -- 11/1/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1.05 173083 671895 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 72.80 173084 672129 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 30.00 173085 675713 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 37.38- 173086 735821 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 24,644.93 303037 11/112007 104482 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 2,134.00 BOOM TRUCK FOR LIGHT POLES 00001325 172954 N7-8 -101 -1 1322.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 2,076.00 BOOM TRUCK FOR LIGHT POLES 00005406 172955 N7 -8 -102 -1 1322.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 4,210.00 303038 11/1/2007 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 121.31 REGISTER TAPE 173127 256221 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 121.31 303039 11/1/2007 106062 HAYNES, STEPHEN 10.50 SUPPLIES 173139 102607 5125.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 171.25 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 173139 102607 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 181.75 303040 11/112007 100012 HD SUPPLY WATERWORKS LTD 1,513.97 HDPE PIPE 00005852 172755 6159218 5932.6535 PIPE GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,513.97 303041 11/1/2007 121601 HEARTLAND DISTRIBUTION LLC 251.40 TIRES 00005997 172850 000634 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 502.81 TIRES 00005997 172956 000619 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 396.39 TIRES 00005990 172957 000046 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 358.31 TIRES 00005653 172958 000367 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,508.91 303042 1111/2007 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 200.64 MEAT PATTIES 172851 020604 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 200.64 303043 11/1/2007 101215 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFI 952.57 BOOKING FEE - SEPT 2007 172959 1714 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES 952.57 303044 11/1/2007 121609 HENNEPIN COUNTY TRANSPORTATION 200.00 DRIVEWAY PERMIT 00001244 173015 102607 05471.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -471 NEW WELL #20 200.00 � J R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/26/2007 -- 11/1/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 303045 11/1/2007 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 3,475.00 SEPT 2007 172960 002115 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER 3,475.00 303046 11/112007 106371 HENNEPIN FACULTY ASSOCIATES 2,333.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 172738 110107 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,333.08 303047 11/1/2007 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG 9,945.17 2 WORK STATIONS 00004046 172961 391390 44005.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 9,945.17 - 303048 11/1/2007 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 297.14 MONITOR 00004471 172756 43114319 1190.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 297.14 303049 11/1/2007 119559 HIGGINS, NANCY 225.00 INSTRUCTOR AC. 173140 102607 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 225.00 303050 111112007 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1,439.90 172799 434162 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 617.25 172894 434229 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 2,057.15 303051 1111/2007 105461 HOLL, SHELLEY 303.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 173141 102607 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 303.00 303052 1111/2007 100810 HRA/CITY OF EDINA 25,000.00 TO FUND HRA 173016 102907 1000.1303 DUE FROM HRA 25,000.00 303053 11/1/2007 100842 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 48.58 OFFICEMAX SUPPLIES 172962 0023000030791 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 48.58 303054 11/1/2007 118458 HYEBAR DANCERS 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Page - 11 Business Unit LEGAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CITY HALL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS ASSESSING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING MEDIA STUDIO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET COMMUNICATIONS 150.00 PERFORMANCE 11/13/07 173017 103007 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/3112007 8:10:05 Council Check Register Page - 12 10/26/2007 - 11/1/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 303055 11/112007 121161 IDEARC MEDIA CORP 14.66 DIRECTORY LISTING 172852 390012392334 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 14.66 DIRECTORY LISTING 172852 390012392334 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY . 14.68 DIRECTORY LISTING 172852 390012392334 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 44.00 303056 111112007 119808 INTEGRA TELECOM 275.69 PHONES 173018 3264069 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 409.40 PHONES 173019 3265579 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 685.09 303057 1111/2007 121231 INTERLOCK CONCRETE PRODUCTS IN 181.78 PAVERS 00001140 172757 45617 -1 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING 181.78 303058 1111/2007 101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 172737 110107 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 303059 111112007 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 84.00 172853 1117499 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 34.50 172895 1116882 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,230.30 173087 1116881 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,860.20 173088 1116880 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,666.45 173089 1116892 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 87.50 173090 1116893 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 11,962.95 303061 11/112007 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 30.13' CREDIT TAKEN TWICE 172800 350725REV 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 252.50 172801 1336800 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 143.73 172802 1337379 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 60.06- 172803 347508 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 29.98- 172804 337097 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10.01- 172805 357345 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 40.33- 172806 357421 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 15.06- 172807 357347 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 24.65- 172808 357420 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 487.80 172896 1340077 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 186.06 172897 1340078 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 80.98 172898 1340069 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,168.19 172899 1340081 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/3112007 8:10:05 Council Check Register. Page - 13 10/26/2007 -- 11/1/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 4,637.04 172900 1340079 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,672.55 172901 1340080 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 188.16 172902 1340076 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 62.04- 172903 357745 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 62.72- 172904 357746 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,474.80 173091 1340071 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 446.04 173092 1340072 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,781.64 173093 1340075 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 300.24 173094 1340070 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 4,657.64 173095 1340074 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5,805.49 173096 1340073 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,510.97 173097 1340067 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 166.09 173098 1340065 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 545.60 173099 1340068 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 196.22 173100 1340066 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 10.89 173101 1340064 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 6.18- 173102 358112 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 36.00- 173103 358113 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 12.40- 173104 358111 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6.67- 173105 358110 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 28,376.66 303062 11/1/2007 100919 JOHNSON, NAOMI 49.03 PETTY CASH 173142 102607 5110.6235 POSTAGE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 62.97 PETTY CASH 173142 102607 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 79.65 PETTY CASH 173142 102607 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 111.57 PETTY CASH 173142 102607 5111.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 112.59 PETTY CASH 173142 102607 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 415.81 303063 11/1/2007 102113 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 240.89 HEATER RELAYS 00001182 173020 161816 5912.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDINGS 240.89 303064 11/112007 100553 KEEHR; GREGORY 141.54 TASTING CUPS 172854 102307 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 141.54 303065 11/112007 101185 KNUTSON, KAREN \ 500.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 173143 102607 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 500.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Council Check Register Page - 14 10/26/2007 - 11/1/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 303066 11/1/2007 105887 KOESSLER, JOE 158.00 OCT SERVICES 172963 100107 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 158.00 303067 1111/2007 120987 KUNDE CONSULTANTS INC. 115.25 OAK WILT ASSESSMENT 00001080 172964 16649 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 185.74 OAK WILT INSPECTION 00001079 172965 16650 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 277.35 OAK WILT INSPECTION 00001078 172966 16651 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 673.41 OAK WILT INSPECTION 00001082 172967 16647 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 186.45 OAK WILT ASSESSMENT 00001081 172968 16648 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 1,438.20 303068 1111/2007 117185 LANNERS, JENNIE 1,595.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 173144 102607 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,595.00 303069 111112007 101220 LANO EQUIPMENT INC. 26.87 ELEMENT, FUNNEL 00002374 172855 173123 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 26.87 303070 11/1/2007 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 188.99 NUTS, WASHERS, TY -RAP 00001161 172758 6139873 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 111.49 LAMPS 00001163 172759 6139875 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 344.48 WASHERS, CRIMP DIES 00001170 172856 6149485 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 249.55 TROUBLE LIGHT 00001162 172857 6139874 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 894.51 303071 1111/2007 102965 LEONE, RON 335.66 UNIFORM PURCHASE 172858 102407 1553.6201 LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 335.66 303072 111112007 101433 LIMBECK, MARC 305.49 UNIFORM PURCHASE 172969 102307 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 305.49 303073 11/112007 118815 LITWIN, KATHY 340.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 173145 102607 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 340.00 303074 11/1/2007 102204 LOBBY, MACKENZIE 125.00 DISC GOLF RACK CARDS 172859 12 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 125.00 R65CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Council Check Register Page - 15 10/26/2007 - 11/1/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 303075 11/1/2007 106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC. 78.68 COPIER USAGE 00001512 173021 15592 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL (BILLING) 78.68 303076 11/1/2007 118625 LORENTZ, MIKE 152.13 TRAINING EXPENSES 173022 102507 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 152.13 303077 11/112007 121540 LUBANOVIC, THOMAS 756.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 173146 102607 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 756.00 303078 11/112007 101792 LUBE -TECH 2,823.98 ATF BLEND, BULK OIL 00001342 173023 1462264 1553.6584 LUBRICANTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,823.98 303079 1111/2007 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 419.90 173106 25414 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 419.90 303080 11/1/2007 100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 478.58 MASTER CYLINDER 00001328 172760 2076674 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 73.22 SPRING, BELL 00001329 172761 2076694 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 9.66 BRAKE PEDAL SPRING 00001057 172970 2076798 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 76.86 ANTENNAS 00001052 172971 2076746 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 638.32 303081 11/1/2007 100868 MARK VII SALES 1,570.25 172809 251285 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING .03 172810 251003 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING .03 172811 251004 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,322.75 172812 251005 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,310.85 172813 251790 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,191.95 173107 253416 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 3,005.76 173108 253608 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 11,401.62 ' 303082 11/1/2007 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 170.00 173024 39178 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 232.50 173025 38984 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 402.50 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/26/2007 -- 11/1/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 303083 111112007 101457 MEICHSNER, EARL 44.14 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 173026 102207 1652.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 1647.6406 5630.6406 1647.6406 1551.6406 1646.6406 5630.6406 5511.6511 1646.6406 5421.6511 1552.6511 1646.6530 4077.6103 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1301.6518 5862.5515 5822.5515 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS BLACKTOP COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Page - 16 Business Unit WEED MOWING PATHS & HARD SURFACE CENTENNIAL LAKES PATHS & HARD SURFACE CITY HALL GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE GRILL CENT SVC PW BUILDING BUILDING MAINTENANCE EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 44.14 303084 11/112007 101483 MENARDS 153.89 T -POSTS 00005918 172762 79494 514.46 OUTDOOR LIGHTS, WOOD 00002378 172860 79205 76.95 T -POSTS 00005922 172861 79807 109.12 LUMBER, POLYURETHANE 00001186 172862 79103 245.71 LUMBER, VULKEM 00001312 172972 79775 1,100.13 303085 11/1/2007 101987 MENARDS 65.83 TAPE, ADHESIVE, GLUE 00002375 172863 39061 65.83 303086 11/112007 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 1,193.87 POLYLINERS, CLEANERS 00008028 172763 72768 123.06 ACTI SCRUB, MERI -CLEAN 00001188 172764 72775 279.32 GRILL CLEANER, COMET 00006349 172864 72792 458.27 ROLL TOWELS, TISSUE 00001323 172973 72825 232.98 DISPENSERS, AIR FRESHENER 00001327 172974 72826 2,287.50 303087 111112007 102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 102.00 OFFICIATING FEES 173027 3215 102.00 303088 11/1/2007 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAI 84.08 MIRROR 00001277 172865 455673FOW 58.17 TUBE ASSEMBLY 00001343 172975 455648FOW 13.44 HOSE 00001343 172976 455655FOW 155.69 303089 1111/2007 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 572.00 ASPHALT 00005909 172866 90402MB 572.00 303090 1111/2007 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 434.00 173109 0188086307 206.80 173110 0188415414 1647.6406 5630.6406 1647.6406 1551.6406 1646.6406 5630.6406 5511.6511 1646.6406 5421.6511 1552.6511 1646.6530 4077.6103 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 1301.6518 5862.5515 5822.5515 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS BLACKTOP COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Page - 16 Business Unit WEED MOWING PATHS & HARD SURFACE CENTENNIAL LAKES PATHS & HARD SURFACE CITY HALL GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE GRILL CENT SVC PW BUILDING BUILDING MAINTENANCE EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL MAINTENANCE VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/26/2007 -- 11/1/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 640.80 303091 11/1/2007 102873 MILLER, SUSAN 289.06 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 173028• 102607 5610.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Page- 17 Business Unit ED ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION FIELD MAINTENANCE SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES 289.06 303092 11/1/2007 100522 MINNESOTA AIR INC. 13.48 WATER PANELS, FILTERS 00001515 172867 2089715 -00 1470.6406 34.93 WATER PANELS, FILTERS 00001515 172867 2089715 -00 1646.6406 48.41 303093 11/1/2007 101746 MINNESOTA COUNTY ATTORNEYS ASS 336.01 CRIMINAL ELEMENTS HANDBOOKS 172977 19528 1400.6104 106.50 HANDBOOKS, CDS 172978 19556 1400.6104 442.51 303094 11/1/2007 101459 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARKAS 240.00 MRPA AWARDS LUNCHEON 00007001 173128 5155 1600.6104 240.00 303095 11/1/2007 101144 MINNESOTA UC FUND 226.66 3RD QTR 2007 - 07976541 172979 101207 1550.6046 226.66 303096 11/1/2007 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 16.83 CAMLOCKS 00001332 173029 0074569 -IN 1301.6556 16.83 303097 11/112007 108668 MORRIS, GRAYLYN 175.00 PERFORMANCE 11/15/07 173030 103007 5610.6136 175.00 303098 111112007 102395 MOSE, WILLIAM 23.25 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 173031 102907 4077.6103 23.25 303099 11/112007 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 107.21 QCV COVER, QCV KEY 00001085 173032 591976 -00 1642.6530 107.21 303100 11/1/2007 100916 MUZAK -NORTH CENTRAL 207.54 MUSIC SERVICES 172868 A811589 5630.6230 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Page- 17 Business Unit ED ADMINISTRATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REPAIR PARTS EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION FIELD MAINTENANCE SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10126/2007 - 11/1/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Page - 18 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT TELEPHONE 207.54 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 303101 11/1/2007 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 101958 NICOL, JANET VERNON OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE 333.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 173147 102607 5125.6103 TELEPHONE 333.00 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 303102 1111/2007 SKATING & HOCKEY 100724 NISSEN, DICK POOL OPERATION TELEPHONE ED ADMINISTRATION 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 172736 110107 1419.6102 100.00 303103 11/1/2007 115616 NORTH IMAGE APPAREL INC. 87.40 UNIFORM PURCHASE 00005016 173033 NIA2959A 5913.6201 87.40 303104 11/112007 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPP 195.53 RINK REPAIR PARTS 00005917 172765 129343 1648.6530 195.53 303105 11/1/2007 100712 NORTHERN WATER WORKS SUPPLY 11,505.51 FIRE HYDRANTS 00005833 172766 S01110597.001 5913.6530 11,505.51 303106 11/112007 121551 NYNGAR, BATBAATAR 220.00 CLEANING 173148 102607 5111.6103 220.00 303107 11/1/2007 102712 OFFICE OF ENTERPRISE TECHNOLOG 418.02 172767 W07090607 5420.6188 19.60 ARNESON 172768 W07090600 1646.6188 39.20 GREENHOUSE 172768 W07090600 1646.6188 78.40 172768 W07090600 5821.6188 98.00 172768 W07090600 5861.6188 98.00 HISTORICAL 172768 W07090600 1646.6188 98.00 CARD ACCESS -PARKS 172768 W07090600 1646.6188 98.00 172768 W07090600 1550.6188 117.77 172768 W07090600 1481.6188 124.94 172768 W07090600 5210.6188 139.69 172768 W07090600 5111.6188 156.80 172768 W07090600 5841.6188 196.00 172768 W07090600 1622.6188 225.20 172768 W07090600 5311.6188 638.54 172768 W07090600 5610.6188 Business Unit PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Page - 18 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM LAUNDRY DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL TELEPHONE YORK FIRE STATION TELEPHONE GOLF DOME PROGRAM TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY TELEPHONE POOL OPERATION TELEPHONE ED ADMINISTRATION R65CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date 303108 1111/2007 303109 1111/2007 303110 11/112007 303111 11/1/2007 303112 11/1/2007 303113 1111/2007 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/26/2007 -- 11/1/2007 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 2,546.16 1400.6215 5110.6103 5112.6103 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Page - 19 Business Unit EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY 5862.5513 117993 P & H SERVICES VERNON SELLING 5862.5515 49.05 RADAR REPAIRS 172980 12252 49.05 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5862.5512 102440 PASS, GRACE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 522.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 173149 102607 681.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 173149 102607 1,203.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 234.00 5862.5513 172814 8162266 -IN 26.95 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 172815 8162724 -IN 852.24 50TH ST SELLING 172815 8162724 -IN 926.00 173111 8162726 -IN 2,041.19 119372 PETSMART #463 72.50 K9 DOG FOOD 00003046 172981 T-6125 72.50 106018 PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS 222.47 DEFIBRILLATOR BATTERY 00006338 172869 9000827663 222.47 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 990.38 172905 2528469 2,241.24 172906 2528468 275.92 172907 2528470 12.00- 172908 3370992 10.00- 172909 3370819 4.93- 172910 3370823 16.00- 172911 3370822 8.67- 172912 3370821 4.00- 172913 3370820 20.00- 172914 3371067 9.30- 172915 3370995 7.50- 172916 3370994 1,332.78 173112 2528462 73.33 173113 2528464 276.02 173114 2528467 1400.6215 5110.6103 5112.6103 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Page - 19 Business Unit EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 5410.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Council Check Register Page - 20 10/2612007 — 11/1/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 913.77 173115 2528463 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,273.51 173116 2528465 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,207.07 173117 2528466 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 9,491.62 303114 1111/2007 118333 PINEBEND LANDFILL 129.66 WASTE REMOVAL FEES 00001327 172769 005584 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 129.66 303115 11/112007 103322 PINNACLE SIGNS & GRAPHICS INC. 436.65 SIGNS 172770 22753 5311.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL OPERATION 436.65 303116 11/112007 100956 PIPE SERVICES CORP 5,040.00 SANITARY SEWER TV INSPECTION 00005835 172771 2007088 5923.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COLLECTION SYSTEMS 5,040.00 303117 111112007 120959 PLOURDE PROPERTIES LLC 5,070.00 LEASE PAYMENT #8 172772 110107 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 5,070.00 303118 111112007 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 5,000.00 PERMIT #939 UTILITY BILLING 172870 102507 5910.6235 POSTAGE GENERAL (BILLING) 5,000.00 303119 11/1/2007 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 51.84 TYPE PI - PERMIT #376 172982 OCT2507 5110.6803 CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 123.16 TYPE PI - PERMIT #376 172982 OCT2507 1628.6235 POSTAGE SENIOR CITIZENS 175.00 303120 11/1/2007 100964 PRECISION TURF & CHEMICAL 1,198.13 BANNER MAXX 173034 30341 5422.6545 CHEMICALS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,198.13 303121 11/112007 101032 PRINT SHOP, THE 626.63 NEWSLETTER 00008208 172983 125170 1628.6575 PRINTING SENIOR CITIZENS 626.63 303122 11/1/2007 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 695.75 172816 675812 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 461.60 172917 675815 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 721.44 173118 675818 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Council Check Register Page - 21 10/26/2007 -- 11/1/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,878.79 303123 11/1/2007 121606 PRZ SEMINARS 465.00 FIELD MAINTENANCE SEMINAR 00005930 172984 2175 1640.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 465.00 303124 11/1/2007 100971 QUALITY WINE 433.41 172817 924611 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 347.45 172818 924739-00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 142.30 172819 924738 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 791.00 172820 924859 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,056.80 172821 924610 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,253.31 172918 924592 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,211.84 172919 924665 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 289.15 172920 924035 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,033.35 172921 924875 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 90.00- 172922 920404 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 711.05 173119 924874 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,099.49 173120 924737 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 11,279.15 303125 11/1/2007 104233 QUAST, DEROLD 243.92 UNIFORM PURCHASE 172871 102407 1301.6201 LAUNDRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 243.92 303126 11/1/2007 101965 QWEST 112.61 952 920 -8166 173035 8166 -10/07 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 112.61 303127 111112007 100972 R&R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN 1 471.37 ZAMBONI PARTS 00008031 172872 28942 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 889.87 ZAMBONI PARTS 00008022 172873 28939 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 1,361.24 303128 11/1/2007 120317 RAUCHMAN, VINCE 190.20 TRAINING EXPENSES 173036 102507 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 190.20 303129 11/1/2007 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 70.55 HITCH PARTS 00001051 172773 1361084 -01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 36.18 SWIVEL JACK 00001053 172874 1361302 -01 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 106.73 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/26/2007 - 11/1/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 303130 11/112007 118779 ROGGEMAN, ERIC 45.00 CPA CERTIFICATE DUES 173037 102607 1160.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS FINANCE 45.00 303131 11/112007 101232 SALUD AMERICA 325.00 172822 EMLS101807 5862.5513 5430.6406 1646.6406 5913.6406 5923.6406 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Page- 22 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS 325.00 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 5110.6103 303132 1111/2007 5111.6103 101431 SCAN AIR FILTER INC. ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 141.36 FILTERS 00001139 172774 103217 141.36 FILTERS 00001139 172774 103217 141.36 FILTERS 00001139 172774 103217 424.08 303133 1111/2007 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 10.40 LUMBER 00001185 172985 40552769 10.40 303134 11/112007 119799 SCHIMETZ, SCOTT 23.25 SOFTBALL OFFICIATING 173040 102907 23.25 303135 1111/2007 118092 SCHMIDT, JIM 113.13 UNIFORM PURCHASE 173039 102907 113.13 303136 1111/2007 106387 SHERBURNE COUNTY 500.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 173038 102607 500.00 303137 1111/2007 117819 SOUTH OF THE RIVER COMMUNITY B 50.00 PERFORMANCE 11/11/07 173041 103007 50.00 303138 1111/2007 110977 SOW, ADAMA 704.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 173150 102607 1,088.00 CLEANING 173150 102607 1,792.00 303139 11/112007 105193 SPAIN, MARK 184.30 UNIFORM PURCHASE 172986 102407 5430.6406 1646.6406 5913.6406 5923.6406 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Page- 22 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/26/2007 -- 11/1/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 184.30 303141 11/112007 101004 SPS COMPANIES 303140 11/1/2007 116856 SPRINT 68.49 PLUMBING PARTS 00005901 908.49 0524159777 -2 173042 SEPT15 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING 908.49 0524159777 -2 173043 OCT15 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING 626.80 0640437170 -4 173044 101507 1470.6188 TELEPHONE REPAIR PARTS 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Page - 23 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE COMPUTER SYSTEM EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE COMPUTER SYSTEM EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE COMPUTER SYSTEM CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,443.78 303141 11/112007 101004 SPS COMPANIES 68.49 PLUMBING PARTS 00005901 173045 S1732828.001 1646.6530 68.49 303142 11/1/2007 101910 SUNGARD HTE INC. 709.91 AIRFARE - CAD USER 173046 10620 4608.6710 2,261.34 PER DIEM - CAD USER 173047 10722 4608.6710 19,001.34 SOFTWARE INSTALLATION 173048 10621 4608.6710 21,972.59 303143 11/112007 100794 SWANSON, HAROLD 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 172735 110107 1419.6102 100.00 303144 . 1111/2007 120297 TADYCH, BRIAN 326.11 TRAINING EXPENSES 173049 102507 1281.6104 326.11 303145 111112007 101027 TARGET 130.85 9- 555 - 029 -840 173050 101807 5410.6406 130.85 303146 1111/2007 102300 TCALMC 390.00 LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT PROOND5774 172987 092007 1640.6104 390.00 303147 71/112007 117686 TECHNAGRAPHICS 211.29 POLICE ADVISORY CARDS 172988 5481011 1400.6575 211.29 303148 11/1/2007 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 365.09 SPLICES, CONNECTORS 00005993 172989 39686 -00 1553.6530 365.09 REPAIR PARTS 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Page - 23 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE COMPUTER SYSTEM EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE COMPUTER SYSTEM EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE COMPUTER SYSTEM CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Council Check Register Page - 24 10/26/2007 - 11/1/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 303149 11/1/2007 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 2,189.30 173121 467081 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 69.60 173122 467080 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,258.90 303150 11/1/2007 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 500.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 172875 2007 -5808 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 500.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 172875 2007 -5808 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 500.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 172875 2007 -5808 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,500.00 303151 11/112007 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLAN 388.80 LEAK LOCATING 00001242 172775 000200704287 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 823.92 BRIDGE CONSULTING 00005419 172990 000200704323 47055.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE REPAIR 1,212.72 303152 11/1/2007 118704 TOWNSHEND, SCHUYLER 9.41 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 173051 102907 2210.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COMMUNICATIONS 90.96 AV SUPPLIES 173051 102907 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 100.37 303153 11/1/2007 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 9.84 SHIPPING CHARGES 00001318 172876 TRAN 8537 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 9.84 303154 11/1/2007 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. 55.52 PAGERS 173052 Q6339611J 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 55.52 303155 11/1/2007 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 2,110.00 WATER MAIN REPAIR 00001241 172776 12672 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,110.00 303156 11/112007 102225 VALLIERE, ANITA 125.61 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 173053 102507 5410.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 125.61 303157 11/112007 120620 VALLONE, AMANDA 345.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 173152 102607 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 345.00 303158 c 11/1/2007 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Page - 25 Business Unit YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 715.00 GATEWAY AUAR 172879 27029 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 715.00 303162 1111/2007 121611 VON BARGEN, AMY 210.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 173151 102607 5110.6103 R65CKREG LOG20000 ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 11/112007 120233 WALLERICH, NICK 10/26/2007 - 11/1/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 64.22 BAGS 00007512 172991 055940 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 64.22 303164 11/1/2007 303159 11/112007 115380 VARITECH INDUSTRIES INC. 8,322.98 SALT BRINE SYSTEM 00005397 172777 110868 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 393.42 HOSE KITS 00001183 172877 110934 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 8,716.40 303165 111112007 303160 111112007 104820 VOELKER, JAMES 19.98 29.99 UNIFORM PURCHASE 172878 102307 1553.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 29.99 19.98 303161 111112007 100023 VOGEL, ROBERT C. 11/112007 103266 WELSH COMPANIES LLC 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Page - 25 Business Unit YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 715.00 GATEWAY AUAR 172879 27029 1500.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES 715.00 303162 1111/2007 121611 VON BARGEN, AMY 210.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 173151 102607 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 210.00 303163 11/112007 120233 WALLERICH, NICK 298.72 TRAINING EXPENSES 173054 102507 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 298.72 303164 11/1/2007 101080 WALSH, WILLIAM 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 172734 110107 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 303165 111112007 117074 WEIERKE, DAVID 19.98 UNIFORM PURCHASE 173055 102907 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 19.98 303166 11/112007 103266 WELSH COMPANIES LLC 645.58 NOV 2007 MAINTENANCE 172778 110107 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 545.58 303167 111112007 102100 WERRE, JIM 278.19 UPS CHARGE - SHOE RETURN 173056 102407 5440.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 278.19 303168 11/1/2007 120169 WHAT WORKS INC. 1,520.00 CONSULTING FEES 172992 ED07 -03 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS R55CKREG LOG20000 172923 208919 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 194.16 Council Check Register 208917 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 10/26/2007 — 11/1/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,520.00 1.187.71 173125 303169 11/112007 5822.5513 101079 WHEELER LUMBER 50TH ST SELLING 298.92 ROUGH POST 00001317 172880 1220 - 022855 1343.6533 GUARD RAIL MATERIAL 296.76 298.92 303176 11/1/2007 303170 11/1/2007 121603 WHITE BEAR LAKE POLICE DEPARTM GATEWAY AUAR 10131/2007 8:10:05 Page - 26 Business Unit BRIDGES GUARD RAILS 50.00 FIELD SOBRIETY TRAINING 172993 20071011 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS -POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50.00 303171 1111/2007 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 694.40 172823 178112 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 928.92 172824 178110 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 523.75 173123 178111 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,147.07 303172 1111/2007 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 469.73 172923 208919 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 194.16 172924 208917 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,194.44 173124 208918 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.187.71 173125 208916 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 303173 1111/2007 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 542.00 542.00 303174 11/1/2007 120223 WORTHINGTON, HEATHER 386.42 ICMA CONFERENCE AIRFARE 809.70 ICMA CONFERENCE EXPENSES 1,196.12 303175 1111/2007 112752 WPS- MEDICARE PART B 296.76 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 296.76 303176 11/1/2007 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 5,095.75 GATEWAY AUAR 6,658.00 GATEWAY AUAR 11,753.75 303177 11/1/2007 101726 XCEL ENERGY i 173126 201780 5822.5513 173057 102507 1120.6104 173058 OCT25 1120.6104 172881 GERALD ROCHEL 1470.4329 172825 5- 8 -21 -07 1500.6103 172826 6 -9/21 1500.6103 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION AMBULANCE FEES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONTINGENCIES CONTINGENCIES 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Page- 27 Business Unit TRAFFIC SIGNALS CITY HALL GENERAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS GOLF DOME PROGRAM DISTRIBUTION STREET LIGHTING REGULAR EDINBOROUGH PARK SENIOR CITIZENS ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT AQUATIC WEEDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS BUILDING MAINTENANCE R65CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 10/26/2007 -- 11/1/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 180.49 51- 4966303 -6 173059 130119177 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER 7,390.21 51- 6955679 -8 173060 130077655 1551.6186 HEAT 31.60 51- 6892224 -5 173061 129745847 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER 1,170.08 51- 6223269 -1 173062 129728733 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER 112.81 51- 5005454 -3 173063 129697520 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER 55.00 51 -4420190 -3 173064 129685112 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER 10,350.44 51- 6644819 -9 173065 129738801 5620.6185 LIGHT &POWER 2,039.41 51- 5547446 -1 173066 129711573 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER 1,127.51 51- 5107681 -4 173067 129701045 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER 8.52 51- 6050184 -2 173068 129723661 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 80.21 51- 6541084 -2 173069 129736575 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER 22,546.28 303178 11/112007 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 137.85 SEPT USAGE - PARK & REC 00004322 172779 028230394 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 137.85 303179 11/112007 121092 YOCUM, CHRISTOPHER 75.00 CAMERA RENTAL 172994 0102207 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 75.00 303180 11/112007 102500 ZIMMERMAN, TIM 52.97 UNIFORM PURCHASE 173070 102507 1646.6201 LAUNDRY 52.97 405,578.54 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 405,578.54 Total Payments 405,578.54 10/31/2007 8:10:05 Page- 27 Business Unit TRAFFIC SIGNALS CITY HALL GENERAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS GOLF DOME PROGRAM DISTRIBUTION STREET LIGHTING REGULAR EDINBOROUGH PARK SENIOR CITIZENS ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT AQUATIC WEEDS BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 10/31/2007 8:11:45 Council Check Summary Page - 1 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 124,086.10 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 3,932.40 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 50,678.65 05100 ART CENTER FUND 18,486.57 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 1,295.02 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 661.85 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 12,684.82 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 3,529.99 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 13,203.48 05800 LIQUOR FUND 136,250.27 05900 UTILITY FUND 35,872.81 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 4,236.22 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 660.36 Report Totals 405,578.54 s 6 10/26/2007 - 11/1/2007 We cWrm to the best Of &ZknWedge and belief, that these claims comply In all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and procedures d . P' 2- c CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 9/26/07- 10/25/07 Card Holder Merchant Account Name Trans Date Amount Purchase Discription Merchant Name Merchant City State Code JOHN KEPRIOS 2007/10101 $99.00 SEMINAR JOHN KEPRIOS 2007/10/17 $101.20 POSTAGE JOHN KEPRIOS 2007/10/17 $1,381.09 WASHER /DRYER JOHN KEPRIOS 2007/10/19 $734.80 HALLOWEEN COSTUMES JOHN KEPRIOS 2007/10/19 $127.37 SUPPLIES JOHN KEPRIOS 2007/10/19 $203.60 HALLOWEEN COSTUMES JOHN KEPRIOS 2007/10/19 $81.50 ADAPTIVE REC PROGRAM JOHN KEPRIOS 2007/10/22 $14.14 EMPLOYEE WELLNESS MIKE SIITARI 2007/09/28 $63.96 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT MIKE SIITARI 2007/09/28 $106.63 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT MIKE SIITARI 2007/10/01 $10.65 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT MIKE SIITARI 2007/10/01 $79.93 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT MIKE SIITARI 2007/10/03 $25.53 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT MIKE SIITARI 2007/10/08 ($63.95) COMPUTER EQUIPMENT MIKE SIITARI 2007/10/10 $131.50 BATTERIES MIKE SIITARI 2007/10/10 $223.92 DIGITAL CAMERA MIKE SIITARI 2007/10/16 $199.93 DIGITAL CAMERA MIKE SIITARI 2007/10/19 $53.30 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT JOHN WALLIN 2007/09/25 $58.01 WORKSHOP MEAL JOHN WALLIN 2007/10/12 $19.00 NOTARY STAMP JOHN WALLIN 2007/10/16 $194.06 COMP PLAN MEAL JOHN WALLIN 2007/10/16 $28.31 COMP PLAN MEAL JOHN WALLIN 2007/10/24 $159.77 COMP PLAN MEAL JOHN WALLIN 2007/10/24 $20.00 COMP PLAN MEAL $4,053.25 FREDPRYOR /CAREERTRAC 800 - 5562996 KS 5610.6104 USPS POSTAL STORE 800 - 344 -7779 MO 5610.6235 SEARS.COM 9300 800 -676 -5543 IL 5620.6406 COSTUME SUPERCENTER, W. CALDWELL NJ 5620.6406 TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 5620.6406 FAN HUT 800- 5030288 VA 5620.6406 STAGES THEATRE COMPAN HOPKINS MN 1629.6406 TARGET 00002600 ST. LOUIS PAR MN 1513.6218 MICRO CENTER #045 RETAI ST LOUIS PARK MN 4608.6710 MICRO CENTER #045 RETAI ST LOUIS PARK MN 4608.6710 MICRO CENTER #045 RETAI ST LOUIS PARK MN 4608.6710 MICRO CENTER #045 RETAI ST LOUIS PARK MN 4608.6710 BEST BUY MHT 00002816 RICHFIELD MN 4608.6710 MICRO CENTER #045 RETAI ST LOUIS PARK MN 4608.6710 PENTAGON LIGHT CORPORi 650 -697 -5505 CA 1400.6406 CIRCUIT CITY SS #3136 BLOOMINGTON MN 1400.6710 MEGA WHOLESALE 800- 5776791 NY 1400.6406 BEST BUY 00000059 EDINA MN 1400.6160 DAVANNI'S #15 - EDINA EDINA MN 1100.6106 ATLAS CORPORATE &NOTAl708 - 676 -4884 IL 1120.6406 PANERA BREAD #1307 SAINT LOUIS P MN 1140.6103 PANERA BREAD #1307 SAINT LOUIS P MN 1140.6103 PANERA BREAD #1307 SAINT LOUIS P MN 1140.6103 PANERA BREAD #1307 SAINT LOUIS P MN 1140.6103 We confirm to the best of our lartlo iWge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements 0 the City of Edina purchasing polloi and Procedures rats AC X6..0 7 Page 1 of 1 Mike Siitari To: Mike Siitari Subject: RE: praise for EPD - - - -- Original Message---- - From: BlairS @cornerstonemn.org [ mailto :BlairS @cornerstonemn.org] Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2007 10:56 AM To: Jeffrey Elasky Subject: praise for EPD Jeff This. is regarding the case we spoke about yesterday... The mother wanted to compliment Officer Rofidal and everyone else at Edina who handled her daughter's case. She felt that the officer did an exceptional job and just wanted to extend her thanks. The case # was 07040336 Thanks again for your help in this matter. Have a good weekend! Blair Shepherd Legal Advocate Cornerstone 1000 East 80th Street Bloomington, MN 55420 952- 884 -0376 (main) 952 - 646 -6527 (direct) 952 - 884 -0330 (crisis line) 952 - 884 -2135 (fax) www.cornerstc nemn.ore i r i 11/1/2007 AboutBusiness Official Publication of the City of Edina. Minnesota 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 952 - 927 -8861 Circulation 3,346 Editor: Jennifer Bennerotte Assistant to the Editor: Laura Fulton Contributing Writers: Dick Crockett, Jim Hovland, Doug Leskee, Ryan Olsen and Joe Sullivan Publisher: City of Edina AboutBusiness Is produced by the City of Edina. Copyright 2007 City of Edina, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424. AboutBusiness is printed on recycled paper to conform to City conservation guidelines. Cover photo by Polly Norman, winner of the "Doing Business" category of the 2007 Images of Edina Contest. Table of Contents Editor's Notes , The Business Of Edina 2. All Roads Lead To Edina 3. 1955 Olson Bros. Drug Store Now An Edina Institution 4. West 70th Street Turns Heads And Cars 5, 'Freedom To Breathe' Legislation Goes Into Effect 7. City Of Edina Implements Emergency Notification System $_ Edina Community Foundation — Program Chairs 9, Business Notes 10. Usem Named Edina - Morningside 'Rotarian Of The Year' 11 , Gabberts Part Of 100th 'Extreme Home Makeover' 12. Photo Gallery 14. L Editor's Notes In 1981, MTV was launched. Appropriately, the first music video shown on MTV was "Video Killed the Radio Star" by The Buggles. MTV revolutionized the music industry. Slogans such as "I want my MTV" became embedded in public thought . the concept of the VJ (video jockey) was popularized, the idea of a dedicated video -based outlet for music was introduced, and both artists and fans found a central location for music events, news and promotion. Did video kill the radio star? I don't think so. But it definitely changed the radio industry. Arguably, the advent of the internet has had the same affect on the print industry. Newspapers and magazines now have online editions with up -to- the - minute news to compete with other websites. Even so, subscription rates have dropped, forcing publishers to redesign their newspapers and magazines to appeal to a younger audience. At the City of Edina, I have seen a significant shift in the way residents and businesses prefer to receive their communication from the government. More and more people prefer to receive information electronically, via the website or e-mail in particular. A decade ago, the only way to learn about what happened at a City Council meeting was to attend the meeting, read about part of it in the following week's issue of the Sun - Current or wait until meeting minutes were approved. Now, in addition to those things, the City Council has its own newsletter, meetings are broadcast on cable and streamed over the internet, and people who have signed up for a free "City Extra" e -mail subscription receive regular updates. But multi -media production is expensive and the time has come for my department to make some difficult budget decisions. The City has decided to fold AboutBusiness back into its sister publication, About Town, beginning in 2008. You will be able to read many of your favorite business features in that award- winning publication. In addition, we have established a new "Business News" subscription list for "City Extra" We will send out monthly updates about new businesses in town, recently approved projects and business awards, among other things. As a trained journalist who loves the smell of ink, it pains me to admit this is my last AboutBusiness column to be printed on paper. My "Editor's Notes" will be back in some shape or form, but you won't call it a "column" anymore. Thanks for your dedication to the City and its communications efforts. I look forward to seeing you in cyberspace! Jennifer Bennerotte Editor A U T U M N 2 0 0 7 Photo Gallery 1. The Edina Chamber of Commerce hosted a ribbon - cutting ceremony for J. Novachis at 50th & France earlier this year. J. Novachis is a high -end men's clothier. 2. M &I Bank officials cooked breakfast sausages for golfers on Braemar Golf Course's eighth hole during the Edina Chamber of Commerce's 30th - annual Golf Tournament Sept. 14. 3. A ground- breaking ceremony for The District, a retail development on France Avenue adjacent to Centennial Lakes Park, was held Sept. 20, on the site of the former AMC Theater. 4. Expecting Ober Baby, a fashion boutique for moms- to -be, recently opened in the Galleria. A ribbon - cutting ceremony was held Sept. 21. Expecting Ober Baby carries several major designer lines including Fat Belly, EUB and New York -based Liz Lange. 5. A representative of Southdale Center puts her name on a raffle board, one of several games played at the Edina Chamber of Commerce's annual Golf Tournament. The game was sponsored by Grand Casino Mille Lacs & Hinckley. Send Us Your Photos! Photos clearly marked with names and related businesses should be sent to the City at: 4801 W. 50th St., Edina, MN 55424. A U T U M N 2 O O 7 14 AboutBusiness Please Route To: ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ El ❑ ❑ Sign up for "City Extra" Business News! www.CityofEdina.com AboutBusiness Please Route To: ❑ ❑- ❑- EJ- ❑ - ❑ ❑ (tear off panel and attach to front cover for routing) #-- �Mll Sign up for City Extra Business News! www.CityofEdina.com E0 PRESORT STD U.S. POSTAGE PAID Permit No. 3932 Edina. MN Number of years Abdo Eick & Meyers has served the greater Edina area. That's right, Abdo Eick and Meyers has been going beyond the numbers for Edina businesses and individuals since 1963. r.. Audit, Compilation and Review Tax Consultation, Planning and Preparation Estate, Retirement, Pension and Profit Sharing Planning Accounting Services including Payroll and Bookkeeping 0, Consultation on Acquisitions, Business Expansions, Sales and Lease vs. Buy �� And Much More ABDO EICK & (952) 835-9090 kl�JIIISNIEURSLLP www.aemcpas.com G"i(W Ndd 4—.wus & C &..ts a�, I MO o� e I i! tit colip 1888 West 70th Street Turns Heads And Cars Page 5 (continued from previous page) "I personally went to Gabberts to select the pieces, for about four hours. The people at Gabberts are fantastic to work with. The family is young and hip and Gabberts can run the gamut of styles for all the members of the family. Gabberts was excited to help and they were very giving;" Moloney said to me when he only had a few seconds to spare. We got a call from the producers on the set that the Gabberts crew was needed in the staging area to be briefed. The group piled into golf carts and the charge was on. Inside the holding area, there was a moment of calm to reflect. I could see that the impact of what they were doing started to set in with some of the employees. Others were awed at the pace that the construction workers were going to put the finishing touches on the landscaping. The Zen -like period ended when the Minnetonka High School Girls' Volleyball team and the Blake Boys' Football team arrived like a thundering Calvary. Somewhere down the line, I was pressed into service with the rest of the Gabberts volunteers. When the plea went out to help get the floors cleaned so the furniture could finally be moved in, we jumped into action. Upon entering the house, I was handed two rags so I could scrub the floors and dry them. I, along with dozens of people, picked out a square of floor and made quick work out of the task. The mood was definitely different when we got back to the holding tent. The tension was as thick as the mud I was standing in. Even with anticipation growing, there was time for reflection. I was able to track down the volleyball team and find out more of their involvement in the process. The Hopkins Girls' Volleyball Team was rocked by the initial tragedy just like everyone else, only it hit closer to home. When their coach adopted her sister's children, the girls sprung into action. Each member of the team rotated cooking and babysitting, among other things, for their coach who was more like a member of each of their families. "We said, 'What can we do ?' We were all in the same room when the other coaches told us the story of the Swenson family and felt we had to do 0 it something," said Calli Karnahan, current captain of the Hopkins team. On a fool's hope, they sent in a video tape to ABC. "Nobody had any idea what would happen;" said Emily Anderson, former captain of the Hopkins team. "When we heard the Swensons were picked as finalists, we just had a feeling they would get it" The premonition was spot -on. Before they knew it, the Swenson family had Ty Pennington on their front lawn telling them to get up and get ready for a new house, a trip to Disney World and a chance at a better life. Before the mob of Gabberts employees, volleyball and football players helped unpack the furniture, Anderson summed up the feeling of most, saying, "This is the coolest thing I have done in my life. I just want to get to work!" About 50 Gabberts employees volunteered their time to move furniture into the Swensons' new home in August. It wasn't much longer until the conglomeration of people stormed the truck and started to unpack. From that point forward, cameras filmed every single second. To see the rest of this amazing story, tune in to the 100th episode of Extreme Makeover: Home Edition, which will air on ABC in November. Ryan Olsen is Communications Intern for the City of Edina. He not only witnessed the project as a member of the media, but was allowed to work with the Gabberts crew in moving furniture. He had unique vantage points as both an observer and volunteer. A U T U M N 2 0 0 7 Jim Rossman is owner of Anderson Cleaners at 4412 Valley View Road. Q: Why did you open your business in Edina? A: My dad originally opened a store down the street in 1986. 1 moved to this spot a few years ago because I liked the location and had the opportunity to purchase the building. Q: What is the best part of having a business in Edina? A: The customers are great. I've operated stores throughout the Twin Cities and the Edina customers are particularly nice to serve. Q: What changes have you seen in the Edina business community since you opened your business? A: Well, selfishly from a dry cleaning perspective, there is a lot more casual clothing. But, seriously, there have not been too many changes. Edina continues to be a good place to do business. Q: What is one challenge of doing business in Edina? AboutBusiness, Vol. 6, No. 4 A: Competition. Edina is a very desirable demographic for dry cleaners. We differentiate by having a tailor on site, free pick up and delivery, same -day service and a customer VIP program. Q: What one piece of advice would you give to someone opening a new business in Edina? A: Be realistic in your projections. Why should a customer begin to use your business versus the competition? You will have to earn each new customer and continually work hard to keep their business. Q: You have given a lot back to the community. Why is it so important to you to give of your time? A: As a member of Edina Rotary, I pale in comparison to many of the members who give of their time. But, quite simply, it's nice to try to help people who need it. And I enjoy the learning and personal growth that goes along with it. Through volunteering, I have met people that I can consult for business advice, personal support, and many have become new customers. Anderson Cleaners is a dry cleaning and tailoring service located at 4412 Valley View Road, one block east of Wooddale Avenue. Anderson Cleaners offers free pick up and delivery in Edina. The company has 50 employees, operates eight retail locations in the Twin Cities, and is online at www.andersoncleaners.net. The Business of Edina is a regular column of AboutBusiness. It is compiled from interviews with local business owners and managers to explain why they choose to do business in Edina. A U T U M N 0 0 7 1• By Jim Hovland In the aftermath of the 1 -35W bridge collapse, the Regional Council of Mayors had a presentation by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) regarding planning and investment strategies for the Metro District. Approximately half of the state's population, households and jobs are in the Metro District, which essentially covers the seven Metro Area counties plus Chisago County. The Metro District accounts for 50 percent of the statewide vehicle miles traveled and 9 percent of the state's miles of trunk highway system. In the Metro District, problems of ever - increasing congestion and aging infrastructure are placing demands on MnDOT that are outpacing its ability to make improvements based upon its present budget. Under what is called its constrained budget, MnDOT's critical investment priorities are to first preserve the existing system, next to manage that system to optimize capacity and operation and, finally, to expand the trunk highway system. Under its Metro Highway Improvement Plan for the period 2007 to 2016, anticipating a total funding investment based upon existing resources, of $2.3 billion, MnDOT estimates it will spend 42 percent of that revenue on preservation, 23 percent achieving mobility goals, 14 percent on safety and 21 percent on other matters, including expansion of the trunk highway system. Under a fiscally constrained scenario for the period 2008 -2030, MnDOT presently estimates it will have $6.529 billion to utilize on system preservation, for creating advantages for transit, improving interregional and regional corridors, expanding mobility and managing the system. Under a performance -based budget, which simply reflects the needs of the Metro District without regard to adequacy of funding sources, MnDOT estimates the total need for the categories described above at $26.473 billion! In other words, to create the performance -based transportation system MnDOT believes our Metro District requires, over the next 22 years, we should be spending an additional $20 billion over and above what is presently projected to be available from a budgetary standpoint. MnDOT offers no insight or recommendation as to the source of the additional $20 billion necessary to meet their performance based targets, although the legislative branch is an obvious place to begin. Even in our present fiscally constrained budgetary environment, trouble is looming on the horizon. The federal revenue trends indicate that the Federal Highway Account will not be solvent by 2009 unless action is taken this legislative session in Congress. (A significant amount of the money used in Minnesota for transportation comes from the federal government.) It is also projected that by fiscal year 2011, even with the passage of MVST last year, revenues produced from state sources will flatten or go down and construction costs will continue to rise. Illustratively, at present it is estimated that construction inflation will escalate at a rate of 7 percent per year and that between the years 2000 and 2016, construction inflation costs will have escalated by a whopping 155 percent! Based upon these potential funding difficulties, major Metro District projects in the 10 -Year Plan, such as the Highway 169/1 -494 interchange may be subject to further delay. Ominously, once a project is taken off the 10 -Year Plan, it is uncertain as to when it will be returned. Other major projects affected in our area of the Metro District that are presently beyond a 10 -year plan but still in the 2008 to 2030 Transportation System Plan, with no predictable source of funding, include the 1 -494 Bloomington Strip (including the 1 -35W interchange), presently estimated to cost approximately $650 -$800 million for reconstruction and expansion. Based upon the recent difficulties in attaining additional new sources of transportation revenue, MnDOT has begun looking at low cost/high benefit projects. The success of the interim solution on Highway 100 has led transportation officials to consider whether it is worthwhile targeting a portion of their available financial resources to be used toward smaller projects that address key bottleneck locations for the desired effect of achieving a A U T U M N 2 0 0 7 0 0 `a belong to more than 32,000 clubs in more than 200 countries and geographical areas. For more information about the Edina Morningside Rotary Club, contact Usem, 612- 338 -1225, or visit www. emrotary. org. Gabberts Part Of 100th `Extreme Home Makeover' By Ryan Olsen The ground was muddy from the late August rain storms. It would have been a good idea to tread lightly, but that wasn't an option. Hundreds of volunteers were working in tandem, building ferociously to meet an impossible deadline. Trucks, tractors, cranes and other heavy equipment caked in mud dredged through the muck and mire to give a brand -new home to one Minnetonka family. It was a beautiful symphony of chaos as workers, tools and machines forged a new home, and new life, for a family struck with tragedy. Extreme Makeover: Home Edition was on the scene constructing new dreams nail by nail. I was fortunate enough to witness it all. Gabberts was a major part of the 100th episode of Extreme Makeover: Home Edition, providing furniture for the new Minnetonka home. The show will air in November. The Swenson family was rocked by a horrific tale of a crazed ex- boyfriend who murdered Vicki Swenson's sister and her boyfriend, leaving four children orphaned. Terri, Vicki's late sister, was a devoted mom who lost her husband (and father of their four children) in a car accident years prior to her own untimely death. Vicki and her husband, Erik, adopted the children and their family grew exponentially overnight — from three children to seven, with another baby due in November. Vicki was nominated by her students at Hopkins High School for the 100th episode of the touching ABC television series. I was able to be down at the construction site the week of the build to witness an Edina business' integral part of the project and meet students from a neighboring school district who started the powder keg. Gabberts is no stranger to philanthropic endeavors, donating heavily to the Boy Scout headquarters and the University of Minnesota's Raptor center. Once they were contacted about the Swenson family, they jumped at the chance to help. "One thing about Gabberts is it is very community- oriented which has been important to our 60 -year legacy:' said Kathy Crandall, head of marketing for Gabberts. The response from within Gabberts was outstanding. In total, 50 employees signed up to donate their time to help move furniture. The lucky employees who were picked to go were joined by a volleyball and football team to move in the furniture. Of the Gabberts employees I chatted with, most echoed the feelings of Jane Strom: "It is fun to be a part of the show, a show that does great things. We've all heard the Swenson family story and their heartbreak" Sarah Goodrich, part of the Gabberts design studio, had more motivation. "I've suffered some hardships and this is my way of paying it forward," she said of donating her time. I thought with a big show like Extreme Makeover. Home Edition, timetables and detailed planning would be done as far in advance as possible — weeks, perhaps months of planning beforehand. I quickly found out that is not the case. "Wait, wait, wait, hurry, hurry, hurry" is the motto for the show. For example, Gabberts had just five days lead time before meeting with one of the stars of the show, Michael Moloney, to pick out furniture. (continued on next page) A U T U M N 2 O O 7 al (continued from previous page) Paulsen is proud that throughout the 40 -year expansion, Jerry's Enterprises has remained a family business, with his daughter and son -in -law holding prominent positions in the company. Paulsen and his wife, Shirley, celebrated the award with four generations of their family. Jerry's Enterprises is located at 5125 Vernon Ave.. in the same complex that houses Jerry's Foods. Cub Foods is located at 6775 York Ave. S. — Compiled by Doug Leskee and Ryan Olsen Usem Named Edina- Morningside z `Rotarian Of g o a The Year' By Doug Leskee Rotary is about giving back to the community. This year, the Edina - Morningside Rotary Club gave back to one of its own members for all the time and effort he has given to the service club. Marc Usem was presented with the 2007 "Rotarian of the Year Award." Usem has been a Rotarian for five years. After joining the club, which meets at 7:30 a.m. every Tuesday at the Edina Country Club, Usem quickly stepped into its leadership. Since July 1, he has been the club's president. "I am still shocked," said Usem of receiving the award. "It is an honor to be recognized by Rotary. I certainly didn't expect the recognition and am proud to be part of such a great organization:' Usem was presented with the Rotarian of the Year award at a Club meeting in June. He received the award for his diligence and dedication to all aspects of the Edina - Morningside Rotary Club. He has also been instrumental in Camp Enterprise, an extensive three -day camp sponsored by the Edina - Morningside Rotary Club and Rotary Club of Edina which offers students the opportunity to participate in leadership activities focusing on the Free Enterprise System. Through the program, the two Edina Rotary clubs invite high school seniors to Camp Courage to attend seminars given by local business leaders. Usem served as Camp Enterprise Director in 2005 and has worked with Camp "E" in many different positions. Mark Usem is the Edina - Morningside Rotary Club's 2007 Rotarian of the Year. Previous winners of the club's Rotarian of the Year include Paul Nelson, Kevin Ries, Annie Kennedy, Eric Anderson, Charlie Vezina, Patrick Kennedy and Mary Brindle. Usem is a partner with Usem Bergstrand Capital Management. Usem and his partner manage a hedge fund that is called "Quant One" The company is completely electronic and is unique because it scientifically calculates which companies to include in its portfolio. Usem's partner in the company lives in Colorado, but between the two of them, the company is a great success. A graduate of Edina High School, Usem has been involved in the community for a number of years and he and his wife enjoy raising their two children in Edina. When he has free time, Usem enjoys fly- fishing for trout in western Wisconsin and plays bandy field hockey. He is also a member of Edina's Transportation Commission. Rotary is a worldwide organization of business and professional leaders that provides humanitarian service, encourages high ethical standards in all vocations, and helps build goodwill and peace in the world. Approximately 1.2 million Rotarians A U T U M N 2 O O 7 greater and more immediate impact on reducing congestion and improving safety. Illustratively, the trunk Highway 100 bottleneck elimination project, at a cost of $7.1 million, has reduced annual delay by 1,063,500 hours, increased daily peak period vehicle flow increase to 14,450 vehicles and increased peak period speeds to 45 miles an hour in the a.m. and 30 miles per hour in the p.m. peak period. Jim Hovland is chairman of the 1 -494 Corridor Commission. He can be reached by writing to jhovland@krauserollins.com 1955 Olson Bros. Drug Store Now An Edina Institution By Joe Sullivan Contributing Writer In the 1940s, attorney Harry Gustafson and his partner /builder, Peder Mickelson, constructed a single -story building on the north side of what is now Vernon Avenue, near Interlachen Boulevard. Their first tenant was Grandview Market. It has been described as a "hole -in- the - wall" grocery store where Jerry Paulsen was the neighborhood butcher and Stan Hagen was the grocer. Next to the Grandview Market was a small drug store operated by Ferdinand Holland. When Hagen decided to get out of the grocery business in 1950, Paulsen bought him out and moved the operation across the road and into a building at 5033 Vernon that he named Jerry's Lucky Dollar store. Holland expanded into the grocery store space and operated his drug store there for a time. First Olson Bros. Drug Opened In 1955 In 1955, pharmacists Doug and Roy Olson took AboutBusiness, Vol. b, No. 4 over the then - vacant drug store space on the north side of Vernon Avenue and re- opened it as Olson Bros. Drug. Roy and Doug Olson's parents had both emigrated from Sweden. Their sons' interest in pharmacy was inspired by their mother and father when they were youngsters. They encouraged their sons to take science courses in school and pointed them toward careers in pharmacy, considered in Sweden to be "a respectable way to earn a living:" The Olson brothers grew up in south Minneapolis, both graduating from Washburn High School — Doug in 1946 and Roy two years later. Doug received his pharmacy degree from the University of Minnesota (Minneapolis campus) in 1950. After graduation, he joined the U.S. Navy, serving as a supply officer /paymaster on a Navy destroyer. This was the original location of Olson Bros. Drug, on the north side of Vernon Avenue, near Interlachen Boulevard. By 1959, when this photo was taken, Doug and Roy Olson had taken over the former Grandview Market space next door. Doug's brother Roy also got his pharmacy degree from the University of Minnesota, graduating in 1952. He had completed the Army Reserve Officer Training program at the U of M and was commissioned as a 2nd Lt. that same year. He served as platoon leader of an Army medical unit from 1952 to 1954 during the Korean War. Olson Bros. Drug Moved To New Site South Of Vernon Avenue In 1961, the Olsons moved across Vernon Avenue into a new addition to Jerry's Lucky Dollar grocery store. Three years later, they received an offer from Walt Baker, regional manager of the Kroger chain, A U T U M N 2 0 0 7 (continued on next page) m 0 a (continued from previous page) which had a supermarket at 5013 Vernon, also on the south side of the street. He wanted the Olsons to lease space in their supermarket building that was occupied by a Super X drug store, which Kroger had decided to close. In November of 1964, the Olsons relinquished the former Super X space to the City of Edina to make way for Edina's third municipal liquor store. Olson Bros. Drug moved again, this time to space in a new supermarket building being built for Jerry's Foods, a few blocks to the west at 5115 -5125 Vernon Avenue, where Olson Bros. Drug and Jerry's supermarket are still located today. As active supporters of their community, Doug and Roy were loyal sponsors of Edina youth hockey and baseball teams for many years. Olson Bros. also endowed a U of M School of Pharmacy scholarship for undergraduates planning to work in community or rural pharmacies. Gathered for a recent "reunion" of three generations of pharmacist /owners of Olson Bros. Drug: (from left) Doug Olson, Randy Pomerening, Chris Beckmann, Josh Lemm and Roy Olson. Olson Bros. Opt For Retirement In 1994, almost 40 years after they founded Olson Bros. Drug, Doug and Roy decided to retire. They sold the business to Randy Pomerening and his partner, Jim Holm, both pharmacists from Hopkins. After owning and operating Olson Bros. Drug for 10 years, Pomerening and Holm sold the business in 2004 to pharmacists Josh Lemm and Chris Beckmann, its present owners. West 70th Street Turns Heads And Cars By Laura Fulton Over the summer, part of West 70th Street underwent a massive facelift. As the wraps come off, some local business owners and many Edina residents might ask, "Just what are those roundabouts in the road and how do we drive around them ?" Roundabouts have been in place in Europe and Australia since the 1950s in place of four -way intersections. Only in the past 20 years have roundabouts made their way to road construction drawings in the United States. Today, roundabouts are being built in Edina and elsewhere in Minnesota. Three roundabouts have been installed on West 70th Street between France and York avenues. "Roundabouts increase safety at pedestrian crossings, as well as limit the number of automobile accidents that might occur at alternative four -way intersections," said City Engineer /Director of Public Works Wayne Houle. "In addition to improving safety, by using roundabouts we are able to add different geometric shapes to the area and beautify the circles with numerous types of vegetation and lighting systems" According to the Minnesota Department of Transportation, roundabouts enhance mobility in interregional transportation corridors linking regional trade centers, enhance mobility within major regional trade centers and ensure the safety and security of the transportation systems and their users. West 70th Street, as a state -aid route, is the first roundabout project in Edina. "With the redevelopment of Target and the construction of the Westin Galleria, West 70th created the perfect opportunity to incorporate roundabouts into road reconstruction," said Houle. "Currently, the Council is working on a project at Highway 169 and Valley View that would incorporate four more roundabouts into the roadways of our City" A U T U M N z O O 17 E Z a° 0 s a Program Coordinator, Mary Brindle, began working for the Foundation in 2006 after a long record of volunteer service. These Program Chairs and the activities and events they provide for our community play in important role in bringing people together and achieving the Foundation's mission of Strengthening Our Community. Please contact us if you'd like to help as we continue to support these programs into our 31st year. Questions about the Foundation or any of its programs may be addressed to Crockett or Brindle at 952 - 833 -9573 or edinacommunityfoundation@ci.edina.mn.us. Additional information and links to other articles about the Foundation may be found at its website, www.edinacommunityfoundation.org. Business Notes J. Novachis Opens In Downtown Edina John Novachis, who has worked in men's retail at 50th & France for several years, has opened his own store at 3930 W. 50th St. J. Novachis features high -end men's clothing that the owner describes as being "... a mix of contemporary and classical ideas" Since the store opened in April, it has been Novachis' goal to provide high - quality merchandise and service to customers. J. Novachis is a member of the 50th & France Business & Professional Association. John Novachis opened J. Novachis at 3930 W. 50th St. earlier this year. E Z a° s a For more information, contact Novachis, 952 - 927 -8808. Kailas & Associates Moves Down The Block Kallas & Associates recently moved from the former Edina Gateway Building at 77th Street and Minnesota Highway 100 into its new building just down the road at 4940 Viking Drive in the Pentagon Office Park. Kallas & Associates, a law firm, was established in 1991. Kallas offers expertise in real- estate, business and family law. The building Kallas & Associates was formerly housed in was razed earlier this year to make way for Burgundy Place, a mixed -use development. For more information on Kallas & Associates, call 952 - 832 -9352 or visit www.kallas- law.com. Jerry's Foods was the first grocery store opened by Jerry Paulsen, who was recognized as the 2007 Outstanding Grocer by the Minnesota Grocers Association. Jerry Paulsen Named Outstanding Grocer Of 2007 The Minnesota Grocers Association recently named Jerry Paulsen, owner of Jerry's Enterprises, Inc., Outstanding Grocer of 2007. Over the past 40 years, Paulsen has grown Jerry's Enterprises from one Jerry's Foods store in Edina to a corporation that oversees different types and franchises of stores in three states. Jerry's Enterprises now includes three Jerry's Foods stores, 18 Save -A -Lot stores, 14 Cub Foods and two Country Markets. A (_1 T U M N 0 0 7 (continued on next page) �19 During this last year, we have been commemorating the 30th anniversary of the Edina Community Foundation. We are very proud of the program leadership we provide in Edina, and we'd like to recognize the volunteer program chairs who work with the Foundation Board and staff to strengthen our community. Marsha Hunt chairs the 30th Anniversary Gala and has been planning an exciting and meaningful celebration of the Foundation's contributions to the Edina community. The theme of the Nov. 3 event is "Pearls of the Caribbean." Carol Retherford is chairing the 2007 Holiday Home Tour scheduled for Dec. 1. This will be the fourth year we have featured inside views of some of Edina's finest homes, professionally decorated for the holiday season, with music and refreshments at City Hall, where the tour begins. Eric Gustafson chairs the Edina Dialogue, which aims to foster a sense of community by facilitating intergenerational discussion of diverse issues through cooperation with individuals and community organizations. The inaugural event in this program featured global explorer Will Steger speaking on "Global Warming Solutions" in January. Linda Kieffer has chaired the Edina Public Art Committee since its organization in 2004. The Foundation is represented on the Committee and has arranged funding for the Committee's major projects —the art glass and Raven sculpture in City Hall and the summer sculpture exhibitions in Grandview Square Park. Mark Peterson serves as the president of the Connecting With Kids board of directors that includes representatives of the City, the school district, the Foundation, the Chamber of Commerce, and Edina's business, religious and student communities. CWK's goal is to establish connections among these organizations and other resources to enhance developmental assets for kids of all ages. Maria Fesenmaier chairs the Edina 4th of July Parade that is sponsored by the City and the Foundation. With some 80 units, including marching bands and other musicians, community groups, elected officials, horses, kids and veterans, this event has something for everyone and has grown over its twelve years to now draw a crowd of over 15,000. Scott Crosbie, Director of the First John Philip Sousa Memorial Band, chairs the Torchlight Concert at Centennial Lakes Park in August. Featuring music, fireworks, antique bicycles and cars, and other entertainment of the Sousa era, this event offers a wonderful opportunity to enjoy one of Edina's premier park locations. Marcia Wattson, Manager of the Edina Community Library, has chaired the Edina Reads Committee since its inception in 2005. The Committee includes representatives of the Library, the Foundation, Edina High School and other community organizations with an interest in an annual one -book, one community reading program. This year's event featured Stanley Gordon West's novel, Until They Bring the Streetcars Back. Valerie Burke, Coordinator of the Edina Resource Center, chaired the Edina Senior Expo on Oct. 9. The Expo provided exhibits and presentations about resources available to seniors in our community and was co- sponsored by the Center, the Foundation and the Edina Federated Women's Club. In addition to providing funding for these programs through charitable contributions from residents and local businesses, the Foundation provides essential staff support to supplement the work of the Program Chairs and their committees. Our A U T U M N 2 O O 7 E Z S a a Roundabouts may be intimidating to a driver who has never driven through one, but once a basic understanding is reached, driving through a roundabout becomes easy. Three roundabouts on West 70th Street near the Galleria are the first in Edina. More could be considered with future road projects in the community. Following are some rules to follow when approaching and driving through roundabouts. Slow down to 10 -15 mph when approaching roundabouts. Watch for merging bicyclists and yield to pedestrians. Move up to the yield line and yield to traffic already in the roundabout. Wait for a safe gap in traffic and then enter the roundabout. Travel in a counterclockwise direction. • When exiting, watch for pedestrians and bicyclists to the outside who may continue to circulate around the roundabout. The circular intersection design promotes efficient traffic flow, as cars that would have had to stop and line up for a red traffic light are allowed to access the roadway after yielding to traffic in the circle. This efficient traffic flow also reduces car emissions and fuel consumption by reducing stop- and -go traffic. "Traffic is going to move more freely [around the Galleria];" said Jill Noack, Vice President and General Manager of Gabbert & Beck/Galleria. "And the beautification in the center of the roundabouts is going to offer pedestrians, bikers and shoppers a more boulevard -type feel. We are very excited that [roundabouts] are coming to Edina" Edina is not the only metro city to add roundabouts to its road infrastructure. Just next door, Richfield has built one roundabout, with another on the City Council's radar. "The installation of the roundabout at Richfield Parkway and 66th Street has improved the safety and appearance of the area, as well as acted as a traffic calming function;" said Richfield Transportation Engineer Tom Foley. "We will see how it stands up to the traffic that will increase with the building of our new shopping center, but we haven't heard any complaints yet" The West 70th roundabout project is expected to be complete by Oct. 31. For more information, contact Houle, 952 - 826 -0371 or visit www.CityofEdina.com /Engineering. A U T U M N 0 0 7 `Freedom To Breathe' Legislation Goes Into Effect To protect employees and the public from the health hazards of secondhand smoke, Minnesota's "Freedom to Breathe" legislation went into effect Oct. 1. The Freedom to Breathe provisions, an expansion of the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act, were signed into law by Gov. Tim Pawlenty in May 2007. Smoking is now prohibited in virtually all indoor public places and indoor places of employment, including: • bars, restaurants and private clubs; • office and industrial workplaces; • retail stores; • common areas of rental apartment buildings, hotels and motels; • public transportation, including taxis; • work vehicles, if more than one person is present; • home offices with one or more on -site employees, or if used as a place to meet or deal with customers; • public and private educational facilities; • auditoriums, arenas and meeting rooms; • daycare premises; and • health care facilities and clinics. Smoking is allowed outdoors, in private places such as homes or automobiles not used as places of employment, and sleeping rooms of hotels and motels. ia Employers and facility managers play an important role in controlling smoking in their place of business. In general, they are required to: Post "No Smoking" signs at or immediately inside all public entrances. Ask people who smoke in prohibited areas to refrain from doing so and to leave if they refuse to stop smoking. Refrain from providing ashtrays and other smoking equipment. • Refuse to serve noncompliant persons. Free "No Smoking" window clings are available from the City of Edina's Health Department at Edina City Hall, 4801 W. 50th St., or the Edina Chamber of Commerce, 7701 Normandale Road, Suite 101. For more information, visit www. health. state. mn. us/freedomtobreathe. V G*"AME CLUB EDINA Resort -Style Living For 55+ Open the door to a maintenance free life with resort -style offerings at Gramercy Club of Edina. 7100 Metro Boulevard, Edina 952 - 835 -4443 www.coopcommunities.com Another quality development by: A r Cooperative <J 2007 Cooperative Comm united ., u w * .. A U T U M N 2 0 0 7 Rq City Of Edina Implements Emergency Notification System The City of Edina has implemented a telephone notification system for use during emergencies. The City of Edina has contracted with Emergency Communications Network, Inc., of Ormond Beach, Fla., for its "CodeRED" high -speed telephone emergency notification services. The CodeRED system gives City officials the ability to deliver urgent pre- recorded emergency telephone messages to targeted areas or the entire community at a rate of up to 60,000 calls per hour. Messages could be sent for such disasters as storms, hazardous material spills, illness outbreaks or pandemics, terrorist attacks or other emergencies such as a missing person. When a message is sent, caller IDs will display "999- 911 - 9999." All messages will begin with "This is a CodeRED message from the City of Edina" If a phone is not answered, the system will try again, up to three times. The backbone of the system is the City's telephone database of properties in the community. Deputy Police Chief Ken Carlson cautioned that such systems are only as good as the databases supporting them. The City's database contains the numbers of most landlines in the community, but does not include residents' unlisted home or work or cellular telephone numbers. "If your phone number is not in the database, you will not be called;' he said. To ensure no one is omitted, Carlson urges all individuals and businesses to log onto the City of Edina's website, www. CityofEdina .com /EmergencyPreparedness, and follow the link to the "CodeRED Residential and Business Data Collection" page. Required information includes first and last name, street address (physical address, no P.O. boxes), city, state, zip code, and primary phone number. Additional phone numbers are optional. No one should automatically assume his or her phone number is included, Carlson said. All businesses should register, as well as all individuals who have unlisted phone numbers, who have changed their phone number or address within the last year, and who use a cellular phone as their primary home phone. Those with call blocks should program their system to allow calls from 999 - 911 -9999. Carlson explained that the "CodeRED system is a geographical -based notification system, which means street addresses are needed to select which phone numbers will receive emergency notification calls in any given situation. The system works fine for cell phones, too, but we have to have a corresponding Edina street address:' People who have recently moved but kept the same listed or unlisted phone number also need to change their address in the database. "CodeRED gives those who want to be included an easy and secure method for doing so;" Carlson said. The information will only be used for emergency notification purposes. For more information, visit www. CityofEdina. com/EmergencyPreparedness or call Carlson, 952 - 826 -0479. A U T U M N 2 O O 7 Staff Arrie Larsen Manti President arrie@edina.org Julie Cutts Director of Member Services julie@edina.org Laurie O'Gara Membership Director laurie @edina.org Board of Directors Jon Barnett EdinAlarm Brad Beard Fairview Southdale Hospital John Bower Express Personnel Services Ric Dressen Edina Public Schools Jeff Holds Phoenix Technology Solutions Gordon Hughes City of Edina Mike Kallas Kallas & Associates Sarah Kostial M &I Bank Lance Leopold Comcast Cable Michelle Swanson Xcel Energy Skip Thomas RE/MAX Results Sean Wenham Merrill Lynch Paula Wanna Wyman North American Banking Co. ©COLOURS 2007 advertorial Members Tee Up R Goad Time RI ChilIq Chamber Event The Edina Chamber of Commerce's 30th- annual Golf Tournament continued the tradition of sunny skies, but added a new twist this year — chilly air! This made for warm networking conversations on all 18 holes! The day started at 7 a.m. with a wonderful continental breakfast of baked goods and terrific coffee donated by all three Edina locations of Starbucks, followed by an 8 a.m. shotgun start. The companies that sponsored golf holes this year were great, providing a game or challenge at their holes or a tasty treat to keep our golfers on top of their game. The day would not have been possible without the following partners: Presenting Sponsor, Wipfli; Carts, Richfield Bloomington Credit Union; Driving Range, Seaton, Beck & Peters PA.; Putting Green, Southdale Center; Games of Chance, Grand Casino; Lunch, Jerry's of Edina; Awards, Xcel Energy; Beverage Cart, H &R Block; and Photos, Fast Foto & Digital. The golf holes were sponsored by: Byerly's /Lund's Home Delivery; Key Cadillac; Abdo, Eick & Meyers, LLP, Le Bourget Aero Suites; Westin Edina Galleria Residences; Bremer Bank; Twin Cities Hot Tubs; M &I Bank; Christensen Laue, and Rasmus P.A.; Warner's Stellian; IDQ; Merrill Lynch- Sean Wenham ; Topline Credit Union; Comcast Commercial Services; Think Mutual Bank; Phoenix Technologies Solutions and The Principal Financial Group. The winning team shot a 57 -14 below par at Braemar Golf Course! Two teams finished with that score, Frausenshuh Companies and Reluminate. Reluminate won a tie - breaker to take home the hardware. The Kallas & Associates team won the Chamber's "blind bogey" trophies. Thanks to all our golfers, Chamber members and visitors for making our day on the links a great combination of fun and doing business together to strengthen our business community in Edina. Southdale Center sponsored the putting green d the chambers annual golf laurnamenl Fitting for the dag General Manager Jerrq Cohen gave dmaq Southdale ice scrapersi V Richfield Bloomington credit union sponsored the carts for me 301h- annual event Mark pur calendar for these exciting events! Emerald Gala — Feb. 9, 2008 Taste of Edina — May 1, 2008 37th - Annual Meeting — May 28, 2008 31st - Annual Golf Tournament — Sept. 12, 2008 Board Members 2006-2001 officers Kurt Daugherty Board Chairman TDS Metrocom Patty Margarit Treasurer Boulay Heutmaker, Zibell & Co., P.L.L.P. John Donnelly Past Board Chairman Frauenshuh Companies Jill Noack Chair Elect Gabbert & Beck Galleria Staff Arrie Larsen Manti President arrie@edina.org Julie Cutts Director of Member Services julie@edina.org Laurie O'Gara Membership Director laurie @edina.org Board of Directors Jon Barnett EdinAlarm Brad Beard Fairview Southdale Hospital John Bower Express Personnel Services Ric Dressen Edina Public Schools Jeff Holds Phoenix Technology Solutions Gordon Hughes City of Edina Mike Kallas Kallas & Associates Sarah Kostial M &I Bank Lance Leopold Comcast Cable Michelle Swanson Xcel Energy Skip Thomas RE/MAX Results Sean Wenham Merrill Lynch Paula Wanna Wyman North American Banking Co. ©COLOURS 2007 advertorial Members Tee Up R Goad Time RI ChilIq Chamber Event The Edina Chamber of Commerce's 30th- annual Golf Tournament continued the tradition of sunny skies, but added a new twist this year — chilly air! This made for warm networking conversations on all 18 holes! The day started at 7 a.m. with a wonderful continental breakfast of baked goods and terrific coffee donated by all three Edina locations of Starbucks, followed by an 8 a.m. shotgun start. The companies that sponsored golf holes this year were great, providing a game or challenge at their holes or a tasty treat to keep our golfers on top of their game. The day would not have been possible without the following partners: Presenting Sponsor, Wipfli; Carts, Richfield Bloomington Credit Union; Driving Range, Seaton, Beck & Peters PA.; Putting Green, Southdale Center; Games of Chance, Grand Casino; Lunch, Jerry's of Edina; Awards, Xcel Energy; Beverage Cart, H &R Block; and Photos, Fast Foto & Digital. The golf holes were sponsored by: Byerly's /Lund's Home Delivery; Key Cadillac; Abdo, Eick & Meyers, LLP, Le Bourget Aero Suites; Westin Edina Galleria Residences; Bremer Bank; Twin Cities Hot Tubs; M &I Bank; Christensen Laue, and Rasmus P.A.; Warner's Stellian; IDQ; Merrill Lynch- Sean Wenham ; Topline Credit Union; Comcast Commercial Services; Think Mutual Bank; Phoenix Technologies Solutions and The Principal Financial Group. The winning team shot a 57 -14 below par at Braemar Golf Course! Two teams finished with that score, Frausenshuh Companies and Reluminate. Reluminate won a tie - breaker to take home the hardware. The Kallas & Associates team won the Chamber's "blind bogey" trophies. Thanks to all our golfers, Chamber members and visitors for making our day on the links a great combination of fun and doing business together to strengthen our business community in Edina. Southdale Center sponsored the putting green d the chambers annual golf laurnamenl Fitting for the dag General Manager Jerrq Cohen gave dmaq Southdale ice scrapersi V Richfield Bloomington credit union sponsored the carts for me 301h- annual event Mark pur calendar for these exciting events! Emerald Gala — Feb. 9, 2008 Taste of Edina — May 1, 2008 37th - Annual Meeting — May 28, 2008 31st - Annual Golf Tournament — Sept. 12, 2008 The Edina Chamber of Commerce's membership continues to grow. Businesses joining the Chamber since June 2007 are: Associated Bank 7760 France Ave. S. 124 Bloomington, MN 55435 651 - 554 -8718 Maggie McQuiston Brunswick Zone Eden Prairie 12200 Singletree Lane Eden Prairie, MN 55344 952 - 941 -0445 Tracey Monaco Colon Cancer Coalition 8009 34th Ave. Suite 360 Bloomington, MN 55425 952 - 426 -6521 Cindy Iverson H& R Block Financial Advisors 11095 Viking Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 952 - 914 -5429 Chris Neu Hilton Minneapolis South Hotel 3900 American Blvd. W Bloomington, MN 55431 952 - 835 -8380 Jim Waldvogel Jos. A. Banks Clothiers 7443 France Ave. S. Edina, MN 55435 952- 831 -4848 Kurt Hedding Kaleidoscope 7801 E. Bush Lake Road Suite 320 Bloomington, MN 55439 952- 831 -5773 Sandy Rutherford M.S. Cook Realty 5604 Abbott Ave. S. Edina, MN 55410 952- 929 -3949 Steve Cook Moe Legal Services 5200 Wilson Road, Suite 150 Edina, MN 55424 952 - 836 -2733 P Arthur Moe RBC Dain Rauscher 7650 Edinborough Way Suite 800 Edina, MN 55435 952- 838 -7035 Wally Chapman Schrader & Companies 6809 Wooddale Ave. Edina, MN 55435 612 - 741 -8499 Andy Schrader Expecting Ober Baby 3510 W 70th St. Edina, MN 55435 612- 869 -0930 1 Bobby Kroog Increase Your Business... Network at the Edina Chamber of Commerce'. At Your Business Break (AYBB) - 7:30 to 9 a.m. the first Friday of every month. AYBB gives Chamber members the opportunity to visit YOUR office to learn about YOUR company. After Hours - Not a morning person? Then sponsor an After Hours at your business from 5 to 7 p.m. on the third Thursday of every -other month. Tomorrow's Leaders - Our young professionals group meets for lunch monthly. Check out our website for details, www.edinachamber.com. Women Inspiring Success in Edina (WISE) - 1 1:45 a.m. to 1 p.m. the second Friday of every month at various locations. Originally designed for business women, WISE is now a networking lunch open to everyone with timely topics and a slightly female - slant. General Membership Meeting (GMM) - 11:30 a.m. to 1 p.m. the fourth Wednesday of the month at Interlachen or Edina Country Club. Network, listen to the informative speakers and enjoy an outstanding lunch. In addition, participate in the many Committees available through the Edina Chamber. Choose the area(s) of your interest: Government Relations, Education, Marketing, Ambassadors and many more. Advertise your business to all Chamber Members through the Fax Blast, Monthly Newsletter, E- mails, Event and Website Sponsorship. If you prefer to do a direct mailing, you can also purchase a set of pre- printed mailing labels of all Chamber members. Join the Edina Chamber of Commerce to reach out and tell the story of your business to others, then watch your business growl Emerald Gala Set For Feb. 9 "Black Tie Admired, but not Required" has been the theme for the Edina Chamber's Annual Emerald Gala in recent years and the tradition continues this year. Emerald Gala 2008 will be held Feb. 9 at Edina Country Club and is sure to be a sell -out event. Thanks to a wide range of volunteer opportunities available, we hope to, have 100 percent participation by our member businesses and non - member businesses alike. • Volunteer for the Gala Planning Committee. • Sell or buy raffle tickets for $10 each. Proceeds support our scholarships and Teacher of the Year Award. • Donate an item for the silent auction. (We have ideas of things for you to donate.) • Purchase tickets and join us! Cost is $125 per person. • Sponsor a table. Call us for details and learn about all that is included. The evening includes a reception, silent and live auctions, dinner and dancing with music by The Sevilles. Please join us for evening of fun or donate an auction item. For more information, call 952 - 806 -9060. Edina and Eden Prairie Chambers Reinvent Networking When the Chambers of Commerce in Edina and Eden Prairie introduced their new networking plan, EZ "The Power of 2," we had no idea how it would take off. Well, the program which promotes business interaction between members of both Chambers has been a huge success for both Chambers. For years, these Chambers have provided networking opportunities to their own members and relationships tended to stay within close proximity to the individual communities. Members tell us that the opportunity to network is the single biggest benefit we offer and now a few times a year it is bigger than ever at the E- Squared events. This new effort opened much of the southwest metro to members of both the Edina and Eden Prairie Chambers. Edina and Eden Prairie are home to a combined 5,000 businesses and an estimated 100,000 employees. E- Squared is a real boon for the economy in our region, increasing sales and building new partnerships. Join the Edina Chamber of Commerce and experience Ea "The Power of 2" for yourself and your employees. It really is the new way to do business in Edina! O'Gara Begins Works As Membership Director Laurie O'Gara began work for the Edina Chamber of Commerce Sept. 14 as Membership Director. Succeeding Annie Salmen in the position, O'Gara is charged with bringing in new members and recruiting sponsors for all the large events held by the Chamber, including the recently completed Chamber Golf Tournament and the upcoming Emerald Gala and Taste of Edina. "I'm looking forward to meeting current Edina Chamber of Commerce members, and bringing in plenty of new ones," she said. 'Also it will be important to engage new members after they've joined, making sure they experience the phenomenal return on investment that's possible through involvement in committees, programs and other avenues.° O'Gara grew up in Edina and is very passionate about the community. Her hobbies include golf, traveling and performing volunteer work for charities. "I look forward to working with the staff, the board and all of you to build your business network," she said. For more information, call 952 - 806 -9060. Wie O'6ara October 10, 2007 Julie and Paul Banker 4000 Lynn Avenue Edina MN 55416 Edina City Council C/o Edina City Hall 4801 W 5e St Edina MN 55416 Dear Edina City Council: This letter is in follow up to my appearance before the City Council on October 2, 2007, with regard to the poor quality of water supplied to our household and to our neighbors. As I stated on October 2, we have lived in our home for almost three years. Before we moved in, the house was remodeled with all new pipes, new hot water heater and new appliances. Since moving in, our water has usually been a slightly yellow color, with occasional days or weeks of orange or brown water. I have notified the city and have been told that the lines were just being flushed, the water is safe and no one else is having this problem Since fall 2006, the water quality has steadily worsened This summer our three small children took orange/brown/yellow baths on a regular basis. After repeated calls to the Public Works Department, the response was to repeatedly flush the lines, resulting in brown or orange sludgy water being released into our homes and appliances over and over. After discussion with neighbors we learned that the problem is not just with our home. Attached are comments from neighbors attesting to this. We also learned that despite being told the water is safe, the city had not tested the water on our street where the problem exists. Therefore, the neighbors on our street paid for and obtained our own test of the water. The results are attached You will note that several numbers exceed the federal limit This is not just an inconvenience and property damage issue, but is also a safety issue, as evidenced in the attached article. A length of pipe was cut from Lynn Avenue on October 4, and a neighbor saw the pipe as it was being lifted out and noted that the inside of the pipe looked like a sanitary sewer line. Utilities Superintendent Roger Glanzer indicated that the City is considering coating the existing pipes. We are concerned whether this is the appropriate remedy given the level of deterioration and buildup in the pipes. We are encouraged that the City is now taking action and we hope that action continues so that we can receive clean water as soon as possible. We would like to know the cause of the problem, the planned fix for the problem and the timeline as to when we can expect this situation to be remedied, so that we as residents can plan our short and long term actions. Thank you for your consideration of this serious matter. Sincerely, Julie and Paul Banker cc MN Dept of Health � JC� —)L/v e- pa-s r 2 'v e, L a -/e j Spoke w a �D� �' GGc �._.:- GUn G' G�,,•U,S, - G 71917 a lJ v w )el nti+ `rr1 h 0 p e-S �o o� � Lynl-7 u /�-ea r a � � S �-� wb s <�s �q« �Sec��se �Uc�l -� o,� �I-�e c,", 40 (Y - flu t e" I five at 4232 Lynn Avenue in Momingside. I am writing today because I am very concerned with the water quality in my home. I have noticed a significant change in the color and taste. My tub, grout and tile is stained orange, along with my humidifier tanks. My toilets constantly look like they have not been flushed. Lastly the taste of the water is bad. We no longer use it to brew coffee or to drink. I ask that you have the water and pipes tested immediately. Something must be done to insure that we have best water possible. Thank you for your time. Mindy Greeley r•1 Vic ✓ /s X007 117 4t� 4—ool October 15, 2007 Edina City Council Edina, MN Dear City Council Members, We are twelve -year residents of Edina Morningside and have watched our water get worse and worse over the years. The water has more rust in it, tastes worse and smells bad. 'We are concerned about the taste and appearance and, even though we use filters, we are concerned about the effect of the water on our health. Recently a neighbor paid to have an independent analysis done and the results were frightening. We join with other neighbors to ask you to take immediate action and do what is needed to improve the quality of our water. Please respond and let us know what you plan to do. Sincerely, Catherine Gray 4006 Lynn Ave . Edina, MN 55416 952.929.4885 Barbara Nash 4006 Lynn Ave Edina, MN 55416 952.929.4885 Turbidity Turbidity Education & Notification Campaign — Offering More Protection for Those at Risk Turbidity — cloudiness or particles in water — is more than just an aesthetic concern. As turbidity rises, so does the risk of gastrointestinal illness (find out why in column on right). While this might not be of great concern to most of us, the risk for the very young, the very old, and people with weakened immune systems can be higher. To help people make informed choices about their drinking water, water suppliers have partnered with Interior Health to create the Turbidity Education & Notification Campaign. The campaign educates users about turbidity and notifies them of . elevated turbidity levels. The heart of the campaign is the Turbidity Index, a user - friendly tool that shows whether water quality is Good, Fair, or Poor. In keeping with federal standards and provincial regulations, water suppliers regularly test and monitor drinking water to ensure customer safety. • If turbidity exceeds 1 -NTU (nephelometric turbidity unit), a water supplier will issue a Water Quality Advisory through the local media and, where possible, on websites and at public facilities. Children, the elderty, and people with weakened immune systems will be advised to drink boiled water or a safe aftemative. • Turbidity greater than 5 -NTU may trigger a Boil Water Notice, during which all customers will be advised to drink boiled water or a safe alternative. The Provincial Health Officer recommends that newborns and people with weakened immune systems drink boiled water at all times if served by an unfiltered surface water source. Link to: Turbidity Spring 2007 Newsletter page 1, page 22 Frequently Asked Questions (PDF) Safe Alternatives to Tap Water Turbidity is an important water quality indicator because contaminants such as bacteria, viruses, and parasites (e.g. Giardia and Cryptospoddium) can attach themselves to the suspended particles in turbid water. These particles interfere with disinfection by shielding contaminants from the disinfectant (e.g. chlorine). nor is chlorine effective in deactivating Cryptosporidium. Turbidity is caused by fine suspended particles of clay, silt, organic and inorganic matter, plankton, and other microscopic organisms that are picked up by water as it passes through a watershed. While turbidity usually results from natural events such as spring runoff or high precipitation, it can also be caused by manmade erosion. Turbidity, reported in nephelometric turbidity units (NTU), is an optical measurement of water's ability to scatter and absorb light rather than transmit it in straight lines. Turbidity levels are much higher in water from surface sources than in groundwater. Turbidity levels can range from less than 1 -NTU to more than 1,000 -NTU. At 5 -NTU water is visibly cloudy, and at 25 -NTU it is murky. TM TI TI I Well Water Testing Kit www.uldrinkwell.com LABORATORY REPORT Client: Tara Bizily 4005 Lynn Avenue Edina, MN 55416 Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Report #: 151479 Sample Site: Kitchen Sink Received: 09/28/2007 Collection Date: 09/27/2007 Reported: 10/08/2007 At-A- Glance Testing Results (detailed results on following pages) Bacteriologicals Green Regulated Metals Green Inorganics Volatiles Not Tested Herbicides Not Tested Pesticides Not Tested Industrial Chemicals Not Tested Radionuclides Not Tested Aesthetics ,Orange Legend: Green = no detections at or above the Reporting Limit Yellow = contaminants detected below Federal Limit -� = contaminants detected at or above Federal Limit ore = aesthetics contaminants detected at or above Federal Secondary or recognized Limits Thank you for choosing DrinkWell. We appreciate the opportunity to provide you with this report. Your laboratory results were reviewed and approved by Lead Scientist. • . ^' �T r L _E ii DrinkWell(TM) Water Testing www.uldrinkwell.com . Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Client: Tara Bizily Report #: 151479 Contaminants Detected with Related Health Effects & Aesthetics Conditions Below please find a summary of detections for the sample you submitted. The source of any health effect language used in this report is the Federal Register or other United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) documents. For more information on health effects in drinking water, please visit www.epa.gov /safewater. The risk of health problems from exposure to these contaminants depends on several factors. If you have health effect concerns related to your drinking water, you may wish to contact a medical professional such as, your county health department, your doctor or other health care professional. This does not imply UL's endorsement of any of these health care providers and UL assumes no responsibility or liability for any medical advice given to Customer by any party. Sources for aesthetic effect language is the EPA and Rutgers University, Interpreting Drinking Water Quality Analysis, 5th Edition. Shelton, Theodore B. Ph.D. Health Related Contaminants Nitrate Nitrate was detected at 1.1 mg/L which is less than the Federal MCL of 10 mg/L. Turbidity Turbidity was detected at 4.2 NTU which is greater than the Federal MCL of 0.3 NTU. Turbidity has no health effects. However, turbidity can interfere with disinfection and provide a medium for microbial growth. Turbidity may indicate the presence of disease - causing organisms. These organisms include bacteria, viruses, and parasites that can cause symptoms such as nausea, cramps, diarrhea and associated headaches. Aesthetic Related Contaminants Total Alkalinity Total Alkalinity was detected at 13 mg/L as CaCO3. There is no Federal Limit for this contaminant. Total Hardness Total Hardness was detected at 81 mg/L as CaCO3. There is no Federal Limit for this contaminant. Iron Iron was detected at 1.8 mg /L which is greater than the Federal SMCL of 0.3 mg/L. Iron is regulated as a secondary contaminant. It is associated with rusty color, sediment, metallic taste and reddish or orange staining. Manganese Manganese was detected at 31 ug /L which is less than the Federal SMCL of 50 ug/L. E DrinkWell(TM) Water Testing www.uldrinkwell.com Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Client: Tara Bizily Report #: 151479 Contaminants Detected with Related Health Effects & Aesthetics Conditions Aesthetic Related Contaminants (continued) Sodium Sodium was detected at 20 mg/L. There is no Federal Limit for this contaminant. Sodium levels in drinking water are usually low and unlikely to be a significant contribution to adverse health effects. The Institute of Medicine of the National Academies of Science recommends 1,500 mg is an adequate sodium intake for adults between the ages of 19 and 50. The recommendation is decreased to 1,300 mg/day for adults between 50 and 70 years and to 1,200 mg /day for adults over 70. In addition, it is recommended that total dietary intake be limited to no more than 2,300 mg/day. Sodium is not a regulated parameter in drinking water, however the U.E. EPA has recommended 20 mg/L as a guideline for those individuals on a very low sodium diet (500 mg/day) and 30 to 60 mg/L as levels where the taste of water may be affected. Iron - Related Bacteria Iron - Related Bacteria was detected at 5000 cfu/ml. There is no Federal Limit for this contaminant. wellcare® Hotline The wellcare® hotline is a free, friendly service that can help anyone with questions about wells or well water private well owners, teachers, students, realtors, developers, building companies, engineers and health department staff. The hotline's helpful specialists will provide answers or referrals - within 24 hours. You can reach the welicare® hotline by calling 888 -395 -1033. EPA For EPA information on drinking water treatment units and the contaminants they remove, please visit:www.epa.gov/seahome/groundwater/srcttreata.htm. County Health Office Your local county health office may have information regarding private well water treatment including well disinfection for total coliform. Homeowners with a positive result for total coliform are encouraged to contact their county health office for further advice. Contact information may be found in the government section of your phone directory. Water Treatment Professional A water treatment professional in your area may have information regarding private well water treatment. Contact information for water treatment system companies may be found in the yellow pages of your phone directory. 3 DrinkWell(TM) Water Testing www.uldrinkwell.com Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Client: Tara Bizily Report #: 151479 Definitions mg /L 1 mg /L or milligram per liter represents 1 part per million (ppm). An example of a part per million is one cent in $14,000. ug /L 1 ug/L or microgram per liter represents 1 part per billion (ppb). An example of a part per billion is one cent in $10 million. Action Level The concentration of a contaminant which, if exceeded, triggers treatment or other actions which a public water system must take. Aesthetics Contaminant which may affect water quality such as taste, color or odor. Federal Limit Maximum allowable concentration of a contaminant in a public water supply. This applies to primary and secondary limits. Health Effect The source of any health effect language used in the DrinkWell reports is the Federal Register or other USEPA documents. For more information on health effects in drinking water, please visit www.epa.gov/safewater. Herbicide A chemical compound, usually synthetic, used to control weeds. Industrial Chemical Chemicals used or produced primarily in industrial applications. Inorganic Contaminants (IOC) Mineral -based compounds such as metals and nitrates. These contaminants are naturally occurring in some water, but can also enter water through farming, chemical manufacturing and other human activities. Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) The. highest concentration of a contaminant that is allowed in drinking water. MCLs are set as close to the Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) as feasible using the best available treatment technology and taking cost into consideration. Maximum Contaminant Level Goal (MCLG) The concentration of a contaminant in drinking water below which there is no known or expected risk to health. MCLGs are non - enforceable health goals. N/A Not Applicable. IS /1 4 DrinkWell(TM) Water Testing www.uldrinkwell.com Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Client: Tara Bizily Report #: 151479 Definitions (continued) ND None Detected. The contaminant was not detected above the lowest reportable value by the procedure used for analysis. NTU NTU stands for Nephelometric Turbidity Unit which is the unit used to measure turbidity in water. Turbidity refers to the scattering and absorption of light rather than transmission caused by suspended matter such as clay, dissolved organic material and microscopic organisms. Organic Contaminants Carbon -based chemicals, such as solvents and pesticides, which can enter drinking water supplies through runoff from cropland, discharges from industrial operations, underground tanks, spills and other sources. Pesticide A synthetic chemical, used to control pests such as insects and other invertebrates such as worms and nematodes. Primary Drinking Water Standards Legally enforceable standards established by the Federal government that apply to public. water systems. These standards limit the concentrations of specific contaminants that can adversely affect public health and which are known or anticipated to occur in public water supplies. Radionuclide An unstable form of a chemical element that radioactively decays, resulting in the emission of nuclear radiation. Reporting Limit The lowest concentration at which a contaminant is reported. Secondary Drinking Water Standards Non - enforceable federal guidelines regarding cosmetic effects (such as tooth or skin discoloration) or aesthetic effects (such as taste, odor or color) of drinking water. Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level (SMCL) Non - enforceable federal limits set for contaminants included in the Secondary Drinking Water Standards. The purpose of these limits is to assist public water systems in managing their drinking water for aesthetic considerations. Volatile Organic Contaminant (VOC) Group of organic chemicals characterized by their volatility (ability to evaporate). Volatile organic contaminants are widely used in the manufacture of plastics, clothing and other common household items. .'r. ti, Client: Tara Bizily Contaminant Bacteriologicals Total Coliform E. soli DrinkWell(TM) Water Testing www.uldrinkwell.com Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Report M 161479 Testing Results Detail Result Absent Absent Reporting Limit Federal Limit Absent Absent Absent Absent �9 Continued on the following page �'`"� 6 Client: Tara Bizily Contaminant Regulated Metals Arsenic Lead Continued on the following page DdnkWell(TM) Water Testing www.uldrinkwell.com Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Report #: 151479 Testing Results Detail Result Reporting Limit ND 5 ug/L ND 5 ug/L Federal Limit 10 ug/L 15 ug/L 7 s DrinkWell(TM) Water Testing www.uldrinkwell.com Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Client: Tara Bizily Report M 151479 Testing Results Detail Contaminant Result Reporting Limit Federal Limit Inorganics Nitrate 1.1 mg/L 1 mg/L 10 mg/L Nitrite ND 0.1 mg/L 1 mg/L Turbidity` 4.2 NTU 0.1 NTU 0.3 NTU • The accuracy of the test results for turbidity may be significantly affected by the elapsed time from sampling to analysis. On -site confirmation of turbidity is recommended before the installation of treatment equipment to correct reported deficiencies of turbidity in the quality of your water. Continued on the following page 4 0 DrinkWell(TM) Water Testing www.uldrinkwell.com Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Client: Tara Bizily Report #: 151479 Testing Results Detail Contaminant Result Reporting Limit Federal Limit Aesthetics Total Alkalinity. 13 mg/L as 10 mg/L as N/A CaCO3 CaCO3 Total Hardness- 81 mg/L as 10 mg/L as N/A CaCO3 CaCO3 Iron 1.8 mg/L 0.1 mg/L 0.3 mg /L Manganese 31 ug/L 5 ug/L 50 ug /L pH— 6.8 N/A 6.5-8.5 Sodium 20 mg/L 0.1 mg/L N/A Iron - Related Bacteria 5000 cfu/ml 100 cfu/mL N/A ** The EPA has not established a limit for total hardness but water can be classified as soft (0 -75 mg/L CaCO3), moderately hard (75 -150 mg/L CaCO3), hard (150 -300 mg/L CaCO3) and very hard (> 300 mg/L CaCO3). *** The accuracy of the test results for pH may be significantly affected by the elapsed time from sampling to analysis. On ,site confirmation of pH is recommended before the installation of treatment equipment to correct reported deficiencies of pH in the quality of your water. a 0 City Council Meeting Policy Comparison City Minutes Topic . Minnetonka - No time limit - Any topic Eden Prairie - Open Forum 20 min - Any topic prior to meeting - Open Podium 10 min - 5 —10 min limit St. Louis Park - No set time limit - Any topic on the agenda Residents can place items on the Petitions and Communications portion of the agenda - Card system ("',.'SEAL 'CITY Wayzata - 15 minutes total at - Any topic , G start of meeting - 3 min/person Edina - 3 min - Items not on agenda unless a public hearing - Nothing about previous public hearings or future scheduled public hearings City Council meeting procedures: City of Minnetonka City of Minnetonka http: / /www.eminnetonka.com /your —govemment /city_ _council /meeti... City Council meeting procedures Input from residents is important: your participation is appreciated. This information will help you understand the process and procedures for City Council meetings. For further assistance, please view the below information or contact any staff member at 952.939.8200. Meeting times The Minnetonka City Council meets two times a month at 6:30 p.m. with the mayor as presiding officer for regular meetings. The mayor and council members each have a single vote. Four members constitute a quorum. Most council motions require a majority vote for passage, but the agenda notes the specific voting requirement for each item. The council also holds work session meetings once a month on Monday. All meetings, unless otherwise noted, are open to the public. All regular council meetings and some work sessions are broadcast live and replayed on Minnetonka's Cable Television Channel 16. Online videostreaming is also available for some meetings. Dates of upcoming meetings can be found on the City Council meetings page. Procedures • Copies of the meeting agenda are available just outside the entrance to the Council Chambers. • Assistive listening devices are available upon request from staff in the AudioNisual Control Room located outside the Council Chambers. • If you are addressing the council on an agenda item or making a presentation, a pointer system is offered in the Council Chambers to make your presentation more effective. Feel free to try this technology before the meeting. Iof5 10/15/07 12:29 PM City Council meeting procedures: City of Minnetonka 1 http:// www. einnetonka .com/your —govemment/city_council /meeti... The Agenda Special Matters / Deals with items such as awards, proclamations, special recognition, etc. Reports from Council Members Provides council members an opportunity to report on items which directly or indirectly relate to the city. Citizens Wishing to Discuss Matters not on the Agenda, For individuals who wish to address the council on subjects which are not a part of the meeting agenda. Typically, the council will not take action on items presented at this time, but will refer them to staff for review, action and/or recommendation for future council action. Bids and Purchases Action is taken on city purchases and project bid items. Consent Agenda Covers routine administrative matters. These items are not discussed, and may all be approved as recommended on the staff reports. The mayor will provide an opportunity for a council member or citizen to ask that an item be pulled from the Consent Agenda for discussion. Items pulled will receive separate action. All items not removed from the Consent Agenda will be approved by a single motion of the council. Public Hearing Held as a separate item of business on the agenda. The public hearing segment is your opportunity to tell the council how you feel about issues scheduled to be heard. Typically, a hearing follows these steps: • Staff makes presentation • Council members ask questions for clarification • Mayor opens hearing to the public • Public gives input • Mayor closes the public hearing • Council discusses the item • Council takes action When you're called upon for your comments, please step to the microphone at the podium and state your name and address for the record. Occasionally, the council may continue a hearing to another meeting before taking action. Other Business 2 of 5 10/15/07 12:29 PM City Council meeting procedures: City of Minnetonka http://www.eminnetonka.com/your—govemment/city_pouncil/meeti... Items intended primarily for council discussion and action. The mayor has discretion as to what, if any, public comments will be heard on these items. Appointments Various advisory board, commission, committee or task force appointments are made. r Your input is welcome, and your participation is appreciated. a Related pages Your Government City _Council City Council Members - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - City Council Meetings ---------------- - - - - -- How to reach us Monday — Friday 8 a.m. -4:30 p.m. Minnetonka City Hall 14600 Minnetonka Blvd. Minnetonka, MN 55345 Map and directions Phone: 952.939.8200 Fax: 952.939.8244 Contacts John Gunyou City Manager jgunyou@ eminnetonka.com 952.939.8200 Geralyn Barone Assistant City Manager/Director of Administrative Services gbarone@ eminnetonka.com --------------- - 952.939.8216 Jan Callison Mayor 3 of 5 10/15/07 12:29 PM tkj Saint Louis Park, MN Order of business at Council meetings A City Council meeting may have some or all of these - 4, - t� ... • Call to Order: Pledge of Allegiance followed by roll call • Presentations: Proclamations, award presentations, etc. • Minutes: Council members vote to approve or correct the minutes from a previous meeting. Agenda and Consent Item Approval: Council members vote on whether to keep, add or remove topics that will be considered at this meeting. Council members may also vote to remove an agenda from consent so it can be discussed. (Consent items are routine and need no discussion. All consent items are acted upon by one motion.) A member of the audience may also ask the Council to remove an item from the consent agenda. * Petitions and Communications from the Public: Members of the public may contact the City Clerk's office prior to the council meeting to ask that an issue be placed on the agenda. * Public Hearings: A public discussion of an issue where audience members are invited to speak about the topic. * Ordinances, Resolutions and Motions: Council action on a proposal. For details, see "City Council Agenda Terms" in the Agendas &Minutes section.) * Boards and Committees: Council may receive a report from a board or commission, create a committee or appoint individual(s) to an advisory group. * Communications: Council members or City staff may raise an issue to be considered at a future meeting or simply share information of interest. * Adjournment: If there is no additional business, the meeting is closed. link to the top of web page Speaking at a Council meeting Citizens are welcome to speak before the City Council about any item on that evening's meeting agenda. To speak before the council, simply fill out a blue card (available in the meeting room) and take it to the council table. The mayor will call on you when that agenda item is discussed. If a very large audience is present, the council may impose time limits on speakers to ensure everyone is heard. Arrangements for a sign language interpreter or other assistance can be made by calling (952) 924 -2525 or (952) 924 -2518 (phone line reserved for the deaf and hearing impaired) one week before the meeting. Presentation Pointers Here are some suggestions for making effective, credible presentations before the City Council • Be prepared - think about the key points you want to make. • Stick to your own first -hand observations - avoid rumor or unsupported speculation. • Check your facts to ensure credibility. • If you are opposing a proposal, consider offering an alternative solution. * Rather than repeating the statements that other people have made, point out something different or simply state that you agree with previous speakers' major points. • Be respectful of the people who do not share your viewpoint. • Understand that not everyone will be in agreement on a controversial issue. Be prepared to seek solutions that offer the greatest community good. Don't forget that letters and petitions are also powerful ways to share your views, suggestions or concerns. Letters and petitions can be mailed to: City Council c/o City Hall, 5005 Minnetonka Blvd., St. Louis Park, MN 55416. F.; WAYZATA CITY COUNCIL AGENDA City Hall Community Room Tuesday, October 16, 2007 City Council 6:00 - 7:00 PM Workshop - Water Storage and Treatment Plant Replacement * * 7:00 P.M. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING Presenter 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 2. PUBLIC FORUM - 15 Minutes (3 Minutes per person) 3. MINUTESof October 2, 2007 4. PUBLIC HEARING a. Hearing regarding Health Care Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds (Park Nicollet Health Services - Adopt Resolution No. 26 -07) Julie Eddington b. Consider On Sale Beer and Wine License - Blacks Ford, 862 Lake Street E. -New Owner c. Hearing for Collection of Delinquent Charges for Services - Adopt Resolution No. 25 -07 Certifying Assessments to County Auditor 5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS a. Consider Design Review and Shoreland Impact Plan for 230 Manitoba Ave. Res. 27 -07 Gordon 6. NEW BUSINESS a. Consider action on Water Storage and Treatment Plant Replacement Dudinsky City of Eden Prairie http:// www. edenprairie .org/vCurrent/live/ardcle.asp ?i =1485 Home > City Government > Mayor A City Council Counal Member Brad Aho Mayor & City Council Counal Member Ton Dudotad The Mayor and four eli Council Member Kathy Nelson City Council Members make the dedslons that keep Eden 11 Council Member Sherry BuIcber do Prairie moving forward. The Council meets the first and _- Mayor PhU Young third Tuesdays of each month at 7 p.m. In the City Council Chambers at City Center. The Council Members and Mayor all have one equal vote when deciding an Issue. The Mayor of Eden Prairie is Philip Young. Council Members are Brad Aho, Sherry Butcher, Jon Dudcstad and Kathy Nelson. City Council meetings are open to the public unless it Is in rare � dosed session and are televised live on Cable Channel 16. Playbacks of meetings are scheduled for opposite Tuesdays at 7 p.m. and an Saturdays at 1 p.m. n _ �y ��yr� -5-10 �� / yl C� ' I Citizens have the opportunity to speak before the Council during Open Forum from 6:30 too 6:50 p.m. prior to Council meetings To take part In the Open Forum, residents must sign up with the City Manager's office by noon on the day of the 1'rn� meeting. In addition, an Open Podium runs from 6:50 to 7 p.m. where anyone may speak on any City matter.. Scott Neal City Manager 952.949-8412 sneal@edenprairie.org FAX, 952 -949 -8589 To send an email to all members of the City Council address It: allcouncil @edenprairie.org Search �rftr search term. A to Z Listing SearchJ Home D Streaoing video E web ogs E Contact us E Disclaimer City of Eden Prairie " 8080 Mitchell Road • Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344, USA 952 - 949 -8300 • Hours: 8 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. © 2007 edenpraire.org All Rights Reserved To translate this page, click a flag! 0 ©EM= Minnesota state law - Chapter 156 of the Session Laws of 2005 - requires that "a city or county with a population of more than 15,000 must annually notify Its residents of the positions and base salaries of Its three highest -paid employees." For the City of Eden Prairie, titles, names and salary are: City Manager - Scott Neal - $134,971.20; Public Works Director - Gene Dietz - $122,408; Chief of Police - Rob Reynolds - 108,056. Updated: June 15, 2007. 1 of 1 10/15/07 12:41 PM Deb Mangen From: Jennifer Bennerotte 0 -nt: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 10:46 AM Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Joni Bennett; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com Cc: Deb Mangen Subject: FW: Morningside Water Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina o 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 jbennerofte@ci.edina.mn.us From: Tara Doyle [mailto:tarakdoyie @ hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 10:41 AM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Morningside Water Could you please forward this to Councilwoman Swenson. Thank you. Tara Bizily u SEA1- CC-, '. 0 2001 RECEIVED Pot From: tarakdoyle @hotmail.com To: jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Immasica @aol.com; scot.housh @willis.com; jhoviand @krauserollins.com Subject: Morningside Water Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 13:52:27 -0500 Tara Doyle Bizily, M.D. 4005 Lynn Avenue Edina, MN 55416 Mayor James Hovland Members of City Council City of Edina 4801 West 50d' Street Edina, MN 55416 October 28, 2007 Dear Mayor Hovland and Council Members, Thank you for your recent concern regarding water quality in the Morningside area. Unfortunately, my neighborhood continues to experience poor water quality and I wanted to contact you regarding my ongoing concern for the safety and adequacy of the water supplied to our homes. After receiving the test results from the City of Edina's water samples taken at my home on 10/15/2007, I contacted the EPA's Safe Drinking Water Hotline. I spoke with Denny who informed me that these results were "not in compliance" with EPA guidelines. He stated that there were no violations that posed an 10/30/2007 imminent health threat, but that the water did not meet minimum guidelines for potability or usability. I asked if he would personally drink the water and he stated he would not. The results from the testing done on 10/15/2007 indicate high turbidity and Heterotrophic Plate Count (HPC). Turbidity at my home was 21.9 and the federal limit is less than one. Although current federal guidelines only regulate turbidity at the pumping station, I am very concerned that the levels at my home are more than 20 times that federal limit. According to Federal Primary Drinking Standards, levels greater than 5 require immediate action, therefore I am not comfortable using this water for drinking or cooking. The turbid water creates a friendly environment for bacteria, and the UPC results from my home indicate that bacteria are thriving in the water. Generally HPC in Minneapolis water is between zero and one hundred. On 10/15/2007, two homes on Lynn Avenue had levels too numerous to count indicating bacterial counts well into the thousands. The test is not designed to determine the type of bacteria present, so these bacteria may or may not pose a health threat. In addition, chlorine levels in my neighborhood are excessively low or nonexistent. If disease causing bacteria obtain access to our water system, they, will flourish in this environment. The recent letter from the City of Edina states that a remedy for this problem will not be available until at least the summer of 2008 or 2009. As I am currently paying for water that, according to the EPA, is not potable, useable or adequate, I ask that the city begin fixing this problem immediately. Sincerely, Tara Doyle Bizily, M.D. Boo! Scare away worms, viruses and so much more! Try Windows Live OneCare! Try now! Climb to the top of the charts! Play Star Shuffle: the word scramble challenge with star power. Play Now! 10/30/2007 Deb Mangen From: Jennifer Bennerotte -nt: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 1:04 PM Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Joni Bennett; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com Cc: Deb Mangen Subject: FW: Municipal Water System in Morningside Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 jbennerofte@ci.edina.mn.us C-- From: Schwanan @aol.com [mailto:Schwanan @aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 1:02 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte; Jonibennettl2 @comcast.net; Immasica @aol.com; scot.housh @willis.com; jhovland @krauserollins.com Subject: Municipal Water System in Morningside Dear Mayor and City Coucilmembers, 'this date I have been unable to obtain the email address of Anne Swenson, and would greatly appreciate this message be arded to her by one of you. I am a resident of 4010 Lynn Avenue and write to you with great concern about the water problems we are experiencing here in the north Morningside neighborhood. Over the years I have noticed the quality of the water has changed for the worse where I live. When I would call I was often advised the brown colored water was a result of seasonal flushing of the pipes or the amount of rainfall that seeped into the groundwater during the springtime, which seemed true enough. It seemed as though in many cases the problem was rather temporary, until this spring when the water color and smell of sitting water in toilets or anywhere else became increasingly worse. I began purchasing bottled water and when, after several calls, I felt as though my concerns.were not being addressed or made to feel as though it were only my house experiencing this problem, this June I invested several hundred dollars in a reverse osmosis system to have drinking water. I have since learned from my neighbors they share the same problems; having to invest heavily in bottled drinking water or install expensive reverse osmosis systems to provide safe drinking & cooking water, permanently stained tile, sinks, toilets, clothing and sediment build up in household appliances that result in having to replace them. I have also learned that the water is not potable, useable or adequate according to EPA Guidelines completed by independant testing recently. Now I am even questioning whether the reverse osmosis system can remove the danger of the iron levels as I am experiencing some physiological problems that don't seem to occur when I drink purchased bottled water. The letter that was sent to residents recently by the Director of Public Works does not allay my concerns or address our problems. The continual flushing is a horrific waste of water and money, especially when I was told by one of your staff (Roger in Utilities Dept) that they already know the pipes need relining. The offer to provide more chemicals (Ro -Ver) pollutes the environment and does not resolve any of the aforementioned problems I stated above. There is a growing lack of trust here that you, as councilmembers, should be gravely concerned over. This problem has existed for over a year now that I am aware of, some neighbors have established a timeline as far back as 2005. Residents were made to feel as though it was an isolated problem that rested with them and were placated by responses that this would be dealt with very shortly. When I appeared to testify at the last Council meeting, the City manager said it wouldn't be prudent to do any digging until the Spring when the ground thawed. The recent letter from administration states relining the pipes "could take place during the summers 18 and 2009. The timeline for resolving this problem keeps getting pushed back and the residents are losing their nce. The longer you wait the greater the stakes, including health concerns, retribution for property damage, and no doubt OLI per lurking legal issues. Our faith in our civil servants is dwindling though we understand your votes are only as good as the information you receive, so perhaps you may investigate how this matter has been sorely mishandled. 10/30/2007 I implore you to take this matter very seriously and immediate action should be taken to fix the problem without any further delays and to avoid the kind of liability issues that seem to be mounting. Thank you for your time & consideration, Nan Schwappach 952 - 927 -4627 See what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage. 10/30/2007 Deb Mangen From: Jennifer Bennerotte -nt: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 5:39 AM Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Joni Bennett; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com Cc: Deb Mangen Subject: FW: Morningside Water Issue From: Julie Banker [mailto:mnbankers @gmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 6:37 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Morningside Water Issue Please forward this email to Councilmember Ann Swenson. Thank you. Dear City Council Member, 5 � A4 ZIP � 1/ / As you may know, Mr. Wayne Houle sent a letter to residents of the North Morningside neighborhood of Edina on October 23, 2007, addressing the water quality issue in the neighborhood. The letter seemed to misrepresent a few issues and I wanted to clarify those issues in writing to you so that you could understand the complete picture of what is happening inside our homes. First, the water quality has been barely adequate for years, not just weeks. For the last year in particular, the color of the water has ranged from straw yellow to orange. This is not just an occasional problem but a constant one. Please up,'- -stand, after years of off -color water, I have become accustomed to bathing my small children in the yellow or o , water. However, when we go on vacation or visit my parents in Plymouth or even our friends down the street in St. Louis Park, I am struck by how clear their water is. So the water has to be pretty bad for me to approach City Hall with a complaint. Second, despite what was attested to in the letter of October 23,2007, the water samples taken from my home are not in compliance with the US Safe Drinking Water Act. The turbidity exceeds the standard of <1 NTU. (The turbidity at my house tested at 20 NTU. Over 5 NTU can result in diarrhea, cramping and other serious health issues). The bacteria are too numerous to count. The chlorine is extremely low. Interestingly, the iron is not high on the City of Edina test, so is likely not causing the discoloration or the problems. So there is some other problem with the water delivery system that has still not been identified. Professionals at both the Minnesota Department of Health and.the Water Resource Center have told me that my water is not good. It is within legally enforceable limits, but does not meet the standard that most municipalities strive for. Residents on a municipal water line should be able to expect safe, adequate and usable water. The City of Edina chooses instead to provide water that is barely acceptable, cannot be used for cooking without tainting the food it is cooked in, and cannot be used to launder clothes. It is shocking to me that the City will allow residents to live in such circumstances. Third, the RoVer treatment for laundry is not effective under these circumstances. As I know from using it, RoVer only removes iron from white clothing, if it has remained wet, and if the affected clothing is washed in clean water. I have not had relatively clean water for over three months, and RoVer does not work on colors. I have a large pile of formerly nice children's clothing that is now used for rags. I am sure you understand that I will not continue to ruin clothing and now use a laundromat or my parents house in Plymouth to do laundry. With a family of five, this is a huge inconvenience and expense. V he residents of Lynn Avenue and Kipling Avenue continue to ask for is not unreasonable. I cannot connect to a dii.wrent water system, but have to accept the water that is delivered to my home. Therefore, I am again asking for safe, clean, adequate and usable water. If the City cannot provide this through the water lines, then I would like bottled water delivered to my home for drinking and cooking. I would like the repair of our very old pipes to begin 10/30/2007 immediately, not at an undetermined point in the future. Once the problem is fixed, I would like the lines to my house disinfected to remove the buildup that the bad water has caused. I would like the property damage to my home rectified. I would like a rebate on my water bill. Finally, the property damage that the City has allowed to take place for so long should be addressed by lowering the valuation of my home, since my property value has been affected by this. Edina takes pride in being a great place to live. Unfortunately, providing barely adequate water does not fit that image. Everyone I have talked to finds this situation deplorable and cannot believe that this has gone on for so long awithout being addressed. Edina citizens do not have clean, useable, adequate water and apparently will not for some time. The high bacteria and turbidity numbers and low chlorine in the water indicate a real problem -- one we as residents have been pleading for help with for years. I hope that the City Council takes this situation seriously and considers changing how residents are heard in this city, so that issues like this do not continue for years without being addressed. I look forward to your immediate action in this matter. Julie Banker 4000 Lynn Avenue 952- 929 -4069 10/30/2007 Deb Mangen From: Jennifer Bennerotte I: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 5:37 AM Deb Mangen Subject: FW: Proposed Neighborhood Associations V� From: Epersha @aol.com [mailto:Epersha @aol.com] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 7:10 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Proposed Neighborhood Associations Joni Bennett City council Do you have any comments on my proposal for a structured neighborhood association format for the city? I would like to hear what you think. Thanks, Gene Persha . what's new at AOL.com and Make AOL Your Homepage. 10/30/2007 Deb Mangen From: Jennifer Bennerotte mot: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 2:44 PM Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Joni Bennett; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com Cc: Deb Mangen Subject: FW: Children Safety on 70th From: Tom DeBoom [mailto:Tom.DeBoom @genmills.com] OCT.-- 0 �,t ?01 Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 2:29 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte 8Y Subject: Children Safety on 70th To: City Council and Mayor, Each day 4 of my children attend Cornelia Elementary School. They all cross 70th Street in the AM and PM at the Stop Light at Cornelia Drive. I feel it is horrible to have a stop light at this intersection. Cars and trucks speed through the intersection at 30+ mph when kids are flooding into and out of the school. You have to make those cars slow down and stop. Please put a 4 -way stop in at this intersection. Make all vehicles stop in the school zone. Stop lights are the worst option and it must be fixed. You have your high rise on 70th at the Galleria, now what are you doing to prevent your high priced friends from running more high speed SUVs past our school? Who is going to protect our kids? I need to know. T DeBoom E Point Drive Edina, MN 55435 952 - 922 -2230 10/30/2007 Deb Mangen —•0m: Jennifer Bennerotte nt: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 5:46 AM o: Ann Swenson; Jim Hovland; Joni Bennett; Linda Masica; scot.housh @willis.com Cc: Deb Mangen Subject: FW: Interlachen -Blake Road Off -Road Bike Trail et al - - - -- Original Message---- - From: robert's mail (mailto:edgedina @earthlink.net] Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 4:40 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Interlachen -Blake Road Off -Road Bike Trail et al To: Honorable Mayor, Mr. James Hovland Council: Joni Bennett Scot Housh Linda Massica Ann Swenson Subject:_ Council meeting November 05, 2007 Refer to Topic Subject Message: .—SAP\, .,I o01 It has come to our attention via Lee Ann Gustafson that a November 05, 2007 council meeting will have an item on the agenda which is of great interest /concern to we residents in the Blake Road South - Interlachen Blvd neighborhoods, i.e., the Interlachen -Blake Road `f Road Bike Trail. ..e the undersigned are opposed to a plan for an off road bike trail along the aforementioned streets for a variety of reasons, to mention several: We consider the plan to be unsafe to pedestrians, home owners and bikers. We consider risking the health and well being of established arboreal specimens to not be worth a risk of disturbing soil and /or roots that in seasons and years into the future might snuff out the life of many excellent appearing trees. Although some city employees have suggested trees and other floral matter will not be "disturbed" in this plan we have serious doubts. We note the construction industry is always, and we mean always, reminded that no matter how careful one is during an excavation phase nearby oak trees might still succumb, if not immediately following disturbance somewhere down the road. Wouldn't it be sad for everyone in Edina if the magnificent oak on the corner of Vandervork and Interlachen Blvd was eliminated or its roots disturbed so that it died and we all would be denied this specimen. It was simply splendid this autumn, 2007 just as it is every autumn. We also oppose the proposed off road bike path plan for potentially ignoring the quaint yet historical nature of these very old road ways. We came to this neighborhood for its "as is" nature and bucolic wonder some eighteen years ago. This appeal remains so today as it did in 1989. We wish the two particular streets in question be left alone and ask the Council to respect this wish. It is our belief that many citizenry along side, up and down, north side or south side, east side or west side, of the two streets, Interlachen Boulevard and Blake Road South (from Spruce Road to Big Bend along side Mirror Lake) share this view. We ask the Council and the Mayor to not endorse this plan. Thank you. Bob Sauer and Robert M. Zoller, homeowners 300 Blake Road South Edina ph: 952 - 938 -0011 248 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 273 Regular Meeting, October 22, 2007 Room 349, Edina Community Center AGENDA Determination of Quorum and Call to Order Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of September 24, 2007 Approval of Minutes of Meeting of September 24, 2007 Approval of Minutes of Special Meeting of October 9, 2007 HEARINGS OF INDIVIDUALS, DELEGATIONS, AND PRESENTATION OF PETITIONS FROM THE PUBLIC REGARDING ITEMS BEFORE THE BOARD FOR ACTION OR ON ANY OTHER ISSUE ( *SEE ATTACHED DETAIL) PRESENTATION ➢ Star Reporter — Teachers Kristine Maher and Nicole Krier and Students of the Developmental Cognitively Delayed Program, Cornelia Elementary School REPORTS ➢ District Curriculum Cycle Update — Dr. Jenni Norlin- Weaver, Director of Teaching and Learning ➢ Fall Enrollment, Projections, Class Size and Space Analysis Report 2007— 2008 — Dr. Chace Anderson, Assistant Superintendent; and Jay Willemssen, Director of Business Services ➢ 2008 -09 Enrollment, Facility, and Class Size Direction Plan — Dr: Ric Dressen, Superintendent CONSENT 131 Personnel Recommendations 249 -253 132 Community Education Services Personnel Recommendations 254 133 Expenditures Payable on October 9, 2007, appended 255 134 Expenditures Payable on October 22, 2007, appended 256 135 Bond Fund Expenditures Payable on September 27, 2007 257 -259 136 Bond Fund Expenditures Payable on October 16, 2007 260 -262 ACTION 137 Closing of Nonresident Enrollment 263 138 New Policy 105 — School District: School District Mission, Values, 264 -267 Beliefs and Strategic Direction 139 New Policy 106 — School District: School District Goals and School 268 -270 Improvement Goals 140 New Policy 107 — School District: Public Relations and School 271 -273 Communications 141 Revised Policy,(PFeseduFe 3280 — Business: Acceptance of Gifts; 274 -278 142 Revised Policy 6110.6 — Instruction: Course Credit for Learning 279 -284 INFORMATION 143 2008 -09 Enrollment, Facility, and Class Size Direction 285 -286 144 Edina High School Distributive Education Clubs of America (DECA) 287 Conference 145 Staff Recognition 288 LEADERSHIP UPDATE Board Committee Meetings Adjournment *Persons who wish to address the Board are requested to complete and submit an appropriate form to the Board Secretary prior to the designated hearing time. When recognized, each individual shall identify himself /herself and the group represented, if any. He /She shall then state the reason for addressing the Board and shall be limited in time at the discretion of the Board Chair. Individual employees of the School District or representatives of employee organizations shall have utilized administrative procedures before making a request to address the Board. Deb Mangen From: Laura Fulton " .Int: Thursday, October 18, 2007 8:08 AM 'jhovland @krauseroll ins. corn'; 'Housh, Scot'; 'Immasica @aol.com'; 'ANN SWENSON'; 'jonibennett12 @comcast.net' Cc: Deb Mangen Subject: FW: Comcast From: Lee Pyles [mailto:pyles001 @umn.edu] Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 7:29 PM To: Laura Fulton Subject: Comcast Please go look at this website and the response from other citizens regarding Comcast. They are providing awful service. I will vote for anyone who tries to introduce competition in Edina for cable or internet service. Thank you Lee Pyles 5215 Green Farms Court http : / /www.insidenova.com /servlet /Satellite? pagename= lSN /MGArticle /WPN BasicArticle &c= MGArticle &cid= 1173353015622 s ACT �Fo 10/18/2007 OPUS@ OPUS NORTHWEST, L.L.C. of A member of The Opus Group 10350 Bren Road West "; E OPUS GROUP Minnetonka, MN 55343 R C H I T E C T S Phone 952- 656 -4444 C o N T R A C T o R S Fax 952- 656 -4529 D E V E L O P E R S www.opuscorp.com October 18, 2007 Mayor James Hovland City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Via Messenger Dear Jim: Thanks very much for the time you took this morning to have breakfast. I enjoyed meeting you and discussing our plans for the redevelopment of the Edina Public Works facility. Both Opus and Edina Family Physicians have been working very closely over the last year to bring forth what we believe is an excellent redevelopment of this site. As we discussed, Jim, it would be ideal to accommodate the redevelopment of both the Bus facility and the Public Works facility at the same time. As you know, Opus spent a great deal of time, effort and money trying to accomplish that objective for well over a year but given different schedules, needs and challenges that was not possible. We believe that our current proposal to redevelop the Public Works facility is an excellent piece of the redevelopment puzzle and will fit in nicely with any future development that may occur in the immediate area. The relocation of Public Works into the ConAgra building makes imminent sense. Even if the City should decide for a mixed use development for the area in and around the ConAgra building, the Public Works facility can easily be accommodated into this potential redevelopment plan. After all, the Public Works building currently exists in a mixed use residential neighborhood. Jim, I appreciate your kind comments this morning regarding Opus' past performance in the City of Edina and we look forward to bringing forth another project that you and all of your constituents can be proud of. Please feel free to contact me at any time with any questions or comments. Yours very truly, Ti urnan Senior Vice President, General Manager cc: Dr. Beecher Gary Collyard Gordon Hughes Tom Lund Dave Menke John Solberg THE OPUS GROUP: Atlanta • Austin • Boca Raton • Chicago Columbus • Dallas Denver • Houston • Indianapolis • Kansas City • Los Angeles • Milwaukee • Minneapolis Naples • Orange County • Orlando • Pensacola • Philadelphia Phoenix • Portland Sacramento • San Diego • San Francisco • Seattle • St. Louis • Tampa • Washington, D.C. �9ZNA, ill �1 o m ��itlBO �• October 23, 2007 City of Edina Northern Morningside Area Residents RE: Municipal Water System Dear Residents: Over the past few weeks, the City of Edina's Public Works Department has received calls from property owners north of West 42nd Street who are reporting discolored water. The City, which always takes drinking water concerns seriously, immediately began flushing and testing water in the area. The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) is working closely with the City of Edina to investigate these water quality issues. At this time, tested samples collected by the city and area residents do not appear to indicate a health risk associated with the drinking water in the area north of West 42nd Street in Edina. MDH has reviewed those test results and deemed the samples taken in the area north of West 42nd Street to be within regulated limits established by the U.S. Safe Drinking Water Act. At this time, no additional tests have been requested by MDH. The Public Works Department of the City of Edina continues to work on the red water issue that is prevalent within the Morningside Neighborhood of Edina. City and MDH officials have indicated that high iron levels likely are causing the water discolorations. However, such levels are unlikely to pose significant health risks. Water for the Morningside Neighborhood comes from the City of Minneapolis. Therefore, the City of Minneapolis and MDH are working with the City of Edina to come up with a short-term solution to reduce or eliminate the red water. You might have noticed the recent flushing and flow monitoring in the area; this will help us determine a potential solution. A long -term solution that the City of Edina is exploring could involve relining the pipes to help reduce the red water occurrences. A portion of this work could take place during the summers of 2008 and 2009. Some homeowners have experienced red water while doing laundry. The City recommends running the water at an adjacent faucet prior to laundering lighter colors. If you do experience red water during the wash cycle, please contact our Utility Department (952- 826 -0311) to have us drop -off a cleaning additive called " RoVer," which will remove iron from the clothes and other fixtures that have been stained. Read and follow all instructions given with the "Rover." City Hall 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 -826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 -826 -0379 Page 2 Morningside Municipal Water System October 23, 2007 To help keep residents informed, please sign -up for the City Extra e-mail notification service. This service is free and allows individuals to sign up to receive e-mail messages from the City on a variety of topics. To sign up for the service, go to the City Extra website at htti): / /cityextra.cityofedina.com and place a check mark in the box next to this project's name, "Morningside Watermain Project." Please contact the City at 952 - 927 -8861 if you are having trouble signing up for City Extra. City staff will regularly send out current updates regarding the project. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact the Utility Department at 952 - 826 -0311. Sincerely, Wayne D. Houle, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer C: Edina City Council Gordon Hughes, City Manager Roger Glanzer, Utility Superintendent Sherry Engelman, City Sanitarian Minnesota Department of Health City of Minneapolis G: \Engineering \Improvements \WM479 Morningside Water Main \2007 northern Morningside Red Water Issue \20071023 resident letter RE Morningside Water Issue—REVISED WH.doc From C. L. SMITH /ol�a. /o7 �� SJrx Deb Mangen prom: Laura Fulton ant: Friday, October 19, 2007 2:09 PM ib: 'jhovland @krauserollins.com'; 'Immasica @aol.com; 'Housh, Scot; 'ANN SWENSON'; 'jonibennett12 @comcast. net' Cc: Deb Mangen Subject: FW: Please send this out to the council members. Thank you. Importance: High 6_1 C`l Lam- ` eU� - - - -- Original Message - - - -- - 5 From: Lee Ann Gustafson [mailto:lcooper@comcast.net] _ Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 2:03 PM bti, l To: Laura Fulton Subject: Please send this out to the council members. Thank you. Importance: High Dear Council Members. It has come to my attention that the Interlachen /Blake proposed trail may be considered for a combination on -road bike path and off -road pedestrian walkway and /or sidewalk. We have had many discussions about the validity of this project - - -how much will it cost, how many properties and trees will it take - - -and for what benefit? WHO IS GOING TO USE IT? Here are my thoughts on the matter. The residents and members of my group are all for doing a BIKE TRAIL on -road. Fix up Interlachen. Paint the lanes. Put up appropriate signage. That is fine. _)wever, no matter how much money has been appropriated, no one is going to WALK on Interlachen Boulevard. Right now as I type this there are cars and trucks a plenty on that road. And it is not "rush hour ". There are hundreds and hundreds of cars every hour and more every year. WHY are we still pushing the pedestrian aspect when no one wants to walk on a busy roadway? If I want to go for a leisurely walk I walk AWAY from Interlachen as does everyone else in the neighborhood. I literally NEVER see people walking on this road. They are in the neighborhoods and on the safe, flat running paths that are all over the city. Where exactly would these residents be walking TO? There are NO schools nearby. The nearest retail location is 1/2 a mile away from my house and getting across that intersection at Interlachen and 50th is like taking your life in your hands. This is MINNESOTA. 5 months out of the year no one is going to want to walk on a hilly icy sidewalk that is constantly filled with slippery icy car spray. Who is going to maintain this? Who's liability is it if someone falls on the new sidewalk? Please Council Members. I beg of you. We need some common sense. 1/2 of the planned route is taken up by Interlachen Country Club's property. Do you think the country club members are going to be walking there? This is NOT the right place for a sidewalk or ANY version of the pedestrian path. Frankly the only bikers I EVER SEE ON THIS ROAD are the professional ones wearing the "colors ". I NEVER SEE any recreational or "regular" bikers. Because it is hilly and winding and has many crossings. pose are my thoughts. Please tell me when this is coming up at a council meeting. I know my entire group will agree with me on this subject. 1 Lee Ann Gustafson lgustafson5 @comcast.net 952 - 240 -1269 G ITY OF _OOMINGTON MINNESOTA October 17, 2007 Cary Teague Planning Director City of Edina 4801 W. 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 Ile: Final AUAR — Gateway Study Area Dear Mr. Teague: The City of Bloomington appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Final Alternative Urban Areawide Review and Mitigation Plan for Edina's Gateway Study Area (the Final AUAR). Bloomington supports the concept of redevelopment within this area and looks forward to working with Edina to jointly plan for the area in a manner that is mutually beneficial to both cities. Bloomington's City Council has approved the following comments on the Final AUAR. 1. Wastewater. Currently, the Gateway Study Area relies in large part upon MCES Interceptor 3 -BN -499 for wastewater service. This interceptor is near full capacity today in the vicinity of 84th Street west of France Avenue. Bloomington is fully committed to working with Edina and MCES on a timely expansion of this interceptor or other mutually beneficial solution to allow construction of development anticipated in both Edina's and Bloomington's existing Comprehensive Plans as well as additional. development proposed as part of the Edina Gateway Final AUAR and other ongoing planning efforts. To increase understanding of and dialogue regarding the interceptor capacity constraints, Bloomington requests: • That Edina modify Mitigation Measure F2 to read as follows: "Prior to commencement of additional development within the Gateway Study Area, the City of Edina, City of Bloomington and MCES must mutually agree to a plan for handling increased wastewater flow from the area." • That Edina modify Mitigation Measure F1 to read as follows: "New development or redevelopment that would increase sanitary sewer flows beyond threshold limits for peak capacity must not commence until improvements capable of accommodating the additional" flows are completed to the MCES Lift Station at I -494 and Toledo Ave. (Bloomington LS #10) and the MCES Interceptor 3 -BN -499 along 80 St.." • That Edina modify Item 6C Anticipated Infrastructure Improvements — Wastewater to include discussion of the needed infrastructure improvements to MCES Interceptor 3- BN -499. MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER 1800 W. OLD SHAKOPEE ROAD, BLOOMINGTON MN 55431 -3027 AN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION /EQUAL PH 952 - 563 -8780 FAX 952- 563 -8754 TTY 952 - 563 -8740 OPPORTUNITIES EMPLOYER Mr. Cary Teague October 17, 2007 Page 2 of 3 , • That Edina delete references on Pages 49, 52, 55 and 58 to allowing 125 additional SAC units "without any sanitary sewer improvements based on capacity ". It is Bloomington's understanding that no additional interceptor capacity exists today. • That Edina delete the statement on Page 48 that "there are no other known redevelopments occurring within Sanitary Sewer Service Area A shown in Figure 18- 1 that are outside of the Gateway Study Area that would impact the MCES BN -499 interceptor and MCES Lift Station #10 immediately downstream of the Gateway Study Area ". As discussed in the comment letter on the Draft AUAR, there are additional redevelopment projects beyond those listed in the AUAR that have received Bloomington zoning approval, namely a hotel/restaurant site at 7951 Computer Ave. S. approved in 1996 and a hotel/office/restaurant site at 4900 W. 78th St. approved in 2001. See the comment below for more detailed information on these approvals. • That Edina include reference to and adjust the analysis as necessary to reflect all redevelopment in the area that has. received Bloomington zoning approval. • That Edina update the Final AUAR to clarify that the lift station at I -494 and Toledo Ave. that services most of the Gateway Study Area is not a Bloomington lift station but rather an MCES lift station. 2. Storm Water Management. Bloomington appreciates Edina's response to Bloomington's comments on the Draft AUAR and looks forward to working proactively with Edina and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District to construct improvements to the "Border Basin" that take into account soil conditions and impacts to adjacent properties. 3. Transportation. A. Bloomington appreciates Edina's support for westbound I -494 access at East Bush Lake Road as expressed in the response to Bloomington's Draft AUAR comments. B. Bloomington supports the changes made to the AUAR to endorse the creation of a continuous east -west parallel arterial north of I -494 from France Avenue to East Bush Lake Road and understands that Edina will discuss this improvement further through its Comprehensive Plan Update. Bloomington's experience is that continuous parallel arterials benefit not only the freeway but also the immediate and surrounding wider area. C. The Final AUAR predicts several Bloomington intersections will degrade to LOS F, especially along East Bush Lake Road, by 2030. The Final AUAR should clarify the extent to which the proposed land use changes contained in the Final AUAR contribute to this degredation and propose measures to mitigate such degredation. D. Please clarify in the Final AUAR whether Bloomington's forecast development to 2030 was included in the traffic analysis or whether some lessor background growth was assumed. 4. Cumulative Impacts. On Page 114 and in regards to Figure 29 -1, Bloomington appreciates the addition of the United Properties office building at 8200 Norman Center Drive to the Final AUAR and requests that other Bloomington projects that have received zoning approval be Mr. Cary Teague October 17, 2007 Page 3 of 3 included in the analysis throughout the Final AUAR, including the hotel (157 rooms) and restaurant (8,000 sq. ft.) approved at 7951 Computer Ave. S. in 1996 and the hotel (125 rooms), office building (236,000 sq. ft.) and restaurant (10,000 sq. ft.) approved at 4900 W. 78th St. in 2001. 5. Miscellaneous Comments. A. On Page 10, please discuss the right -of -way impacts and where. right -of -way will be taken from. Are signalized right turns proposed at Minnesota Drive/France Ave.? At W. 78"' St./France Ave.? . B. There are typos on Page 30. GPD should read GPM. C. On Page 36, please discuss whether additional.wells or PRV's are needed? D. Industrial Boulevard is not currently striped as a four lane roadway as indicated by the Final AUAR. E. One practice used in the past by Bloomington that may benefit Edina is to break mitigation improvements into specific pieces with stated development triggers. This approach spreads out when improvements must be made and more closely ties improvements with impacts. F. In Figure 21 -4, the assumptions for westbound 78th St. appear high in the PM, the assumptions for 78b St. to and from the east appear high, and the assumptions for I -494 to and from the east appear low. G. In regards to Table 18 -2, please note that water use records for Service Area A currently. show 175,000 gpd average flow from within the Gateway Study Area. H. Figure 17 -1 depicts existing ponding areas and surcharges during a 10 -year frequency event. Please note the surcharge of SP_1 (the "Border Basin ") in this figure. 6. Notification. Bloomington appreciates Edina's willingness to notify Bloomington regarding applications in the Study area. Thank you in advance for consideration of Bloomington's comments. Should you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact Larry Lee, Community Development Director, at (952) 563 -8947. U011G VV 111bUZdU Mayor Copy: James Hovland, Edina Mayor Gordon Hughes, Edina City Manager Wayne Houle, Edina Public Works Director LAL 2 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA General Fund - Revenues Quarterly Financial Update September 2007 General Fund revenues total $14,935,722 through September 30, 2007. This amount represents 57.0% of total budgeted revenues for all of 2007, which is down compared to 6 1. 1 % at the same time last year. In fact, total revenues through September 30, 2006, were $15,081,517, so General Fund revenues are $145,795 behind where they were last year after the third quarter. Revenues from sources other than property taxes are behind last year's pace by $516,462, led by declines in intergovernmental revenue and permit revenue, both of which tend to be erratic and therefore difficult to predict. Despite the decline in nontax revenues from the prior year, the General Fund is still expected to finish the year in positive territory when compared to budget on the revenue side due to our historically conservative budgeting practices. General Fund — Expenditures General government expenditures are right where we expect them to be at this time of year (71 % of budget) with no surprises. Public safety expenditures are also following the budget very closely with 74.3% of their annual budget spent. Personal services expenditures have increased from last year due to 1 full -time detective, 1 full -time firefighter /paramedic, and 2 part-time inspector positions that were added as part of the 2007 budget. The Police Department is also in the process of updating its computer system, which will be paid for by the equipment replacement budget. Public works expenditures are equal to 72.4% of their annual budget as of September 30. Contractual services expenditures in the Engineering Department have increased from 2006 due to the Comprehensive Plan, which was anticipated by the 2007 budget. Parks expenditures are where they should be at 74.9% of the annual budget, with no major changes from 2006. Nondepartmental and other expenditures are also tracking closely with the prior year, with one notable exception. Severance payments are up due to the retirement/resignation of 10 General Fund employees with significant tenure. QT &L'sUnvestment Advisory Committee \Quarterly Update.doc CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA Quarterly Financial Update September 2007 General Fund Statement of Revenue, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance - Budget and Actual For the nine months ended September 30, 2007 Expenditures: General government 3,640,815 2007 (1,055,893) 2006 221,022 Public safety 13,389,659 9,948,959 Over/ 8,949,393 Increase/ Public works Budget Actual (Under) Actual (Decrease) Revenues: 3,549,776 2,660,484 (889,292) 2,414,818 245,666 Taxes (1) $ 19,039,386 $ 9,567,499 $ (9,471,887) $ 9,196,832 $ 370,667 Licenses and permits (2) 2,559,250 2,168,100 (391,150) 2,434,881 (266,781) Intergovernmental (3) 730,000 468,029 (261,971) 888,823 (420,794) Charges for service (4) 2,466,230 1,577,832 (888,398) 1,475,662 102,170 Fines and forfeitures 875,000 682,617 (192,383) 664,703 17,914 Other revenues 550,000 471,645 (78,355) 420,616 51,029 Total revenues 26,219,866 14,935,722 (11,284,144) 15,081,517 (145,795) Expenditures: General government 3,640,815 2,584,922 (1,055,893) 2,363,900 221,022 Public safety 13,389,659 9,948,959 (3,440,700) 8,949,393 999,566 Public works 6,121,388 4,431,028 (1,690,360) 3,917,290 513,738 Parks 3,549,776 2,660,484 (889,292) 2,414,818 245,666 Nondepartmental & other 489,428 546,489 57,061 556,339 (9,850) Total expenditures 27,191,066 20,171,882 (7,019,184) 18,201,740 1,970,142 Revenues over (under) expenditures (971,200) (5,236,160) (4,264,960) (3,120,223) (2,115,937) Other financing sources (uses): Transfers in (out) Liquor fund (5) 721,200 - (721,200) - - Revolving fund (6) (50,000) - 50,000 - - Debt service fund (7) (150,100) - 150,100 - - Total other financing sources 521,100 - (521,100) - - Net increase (decrease) in fund balance $ (450,100) $ (5,236,160) $ (4,786,060) $ (3,120,223) 1 The City receives the first property tax payment from the County in June and the second payment in December. 2 The licenses and permits category includes building permits. 3 The intergovernmental category includes grants from Federal, state and county sources. Generally, most of the grants the City receives are reimbursement grants, which means that if grant revenue increases, expenditures must also increase by an equal or greater amount. 4 Charges for services includes ambulance revenue. 5 The annual liquor fund transfer is always made in December. 6 The annual revolving fund transfer is always made in December. 7 The one -time debt service fund transfer was part of the 2007 Budget and will pay off the final year of debt service on the equipment certificates. The transfer will be made in December. G:\P &L's\Investment Advisory Committee \Quarterly Update.doc 2 October 31, 2007 Mr. Chris Simon Store Manager Target Corporation 7000 York Avenue So. Edina, MN 55435 Dear Mr. Simon: City of Edina It was recently brought to our attention that a Target Corporation delivery truck was seen traveling on West 70th Street. Per the Final Development Plan approved by the City Council on May 2, 2006, item 11 of Resolution No. 2006 -56 states "No store deliveries shall use West 70th Street to access the site. "A copy of the Resolution is enclosed. Please reiterate to your drivers that they are not allowed to use West 70th Street to access your site. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Regards, �64XO64wll� Wayne D. Houle, P.E. Director of Public Works and City Engineer cc: City Council Gordon Hughes, City Manager Transportation Commissioners Cary Teague, Director of Planning Alice Roberts - Davis, Real Estate Manager /Property Development, Target Corporation Kevin Bozicevich, Senior Project Manager, Construction Property Development, Target Corporation Forrest E. Russell, R.L.A., Senior Site Development Manager, Property Development, Target Corporation City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 WWW.cityofedina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 Minutes/Edina City Council/May 2, 2006 Mayor Hovland introduced the following resolution and moved its approval: ' I t§JAUTION NO. 2006 56 . k''ws7, � u��ti.t tri• os.x ':xs+i$::•M �hL..i. � FINAL-. -PL TAitGET'CORPORATION 7000 YORK AVENUE SOUTH BE IT RESOLVED BY THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL, the Final Development Plan and for Target Corporation, 7000 York Avenue South is hereby approved with the following conditions: 1. The use of plans and materials as per the plan presented to the Edina City Council at their meeting on May 2, 2006; 2. Bicycle rack location to be formalized; 3. Target to pay 50% of any necessary signalization which shall be constructed per Edina Traffic Engineer Steve Lillehaug, February 6, 2006 memorandum; 4. Intersection, entrances, roadways, sidewalk reconstruction all to be at Target's cost; and shall be constructed per Edina Traffic Engineer Steve Lillehaug, February 6, 2006 memorandum; 5. Target will participate with the City and their promenade architect on the design of the promenade;. 6. Target agrees to modify their landscape and grading plans for the rear fagade to be consistent with promenade; 7. Target agrees to modify the rear fagade facing the promenade to coincide with the promenade design; 8. Proof of Parking Agreement; 9. Watershed District Permits; 10. No construction Traffic allowed access to the site via West 701h Street; and 11 store deliveries shall use West 70� Street to access the s #e; Passed and adopted this 2nd day of May, 2006. Member Hulbert seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Housh, Hulbert, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *HEARING DATE SET OF MAY 16, 2006, FINAL REZONING AND FINAL PLAT, BROWNSTONES ON FRANCE - NOONAN CONSTRUCTION/KINGDOM PROPERTIES - 5200/5300 FRANCE AVENUE Motion made by Member Masica and seconded. by Member Hulbert setting May 16, 2006, for hearing date for Final Rezoning and Final Plat of Brownstones on France - Noonan Construction/Kingdom Properties, 5200/5300 France Avenue. Motion carried on rollcall vote - four ayes. CONCERN OF RESIDENTS No residents appeared to speak. *BID' AWARDED - CONTRACT NO. ENG 06 -5 - CRESTON HILLS NEIGHBORHOOD ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PROTECT Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Hulbert approving the award of bid for Contract No. Eng 06 -5 - Creston Hills Neighborhood Roadway Improvement Project to recommended low bidder, Hardrives, Inc., at $1,893,013.30. Page 22 �QD in �� IS DEFINING EXCELLENCE DATE: October 25, 2007 TO: Jim Riggs Marc Li FROM: Ric Dressen, Superinte ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 5701 Normandale Road Edina, MN 55424 (952) 848 -3900 www.edina.kU mn.us RE: You're amazing! J t U I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for the important role you play in our school district. Your commitment to young people, their appropriate behavior and school safety is most impressive. The respect our students have for you and your work is to be commended. You are amazing! Our school district is off to a great start, among the best as it relates to a positive school culture. I know the two of you have been most helpful in assisting with the positive energy, while still holding our students accountable. On behalf of the administration, I want to thank you. You are great team members. I wish you continued success as we move through the 2007 -2008 school year. cc: Mike Siitari Gordon Hughes WE CARE ♦ WE DARE V WE SHARE Mike Siitari prom: Laura Fulton ant: Monday, October 15, 200711:27 AM fo; Mike Siitari; Marty Scheerer Subject: FW: Homecoming Weekend C Dear Edina Nelghbors.doc -- Original Message---- - From: Genevieve Davila [mailto:Genevieve.Davila @senate.mn] Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2007 11:42 PM To: Laura Fulton; Molly Anderson Subject: Re: Homecoming Weekend Dear Edina Police and Fire Department, As .'a longtime resident of Edina I would like to thank the officers and fire staff that responded to an incredulous event on Friday October 12th during the Edina High School Homecoming game. Attached is a letter explaining how my family has felt in the aftermath of this incident. I am thankful to have such competent, caring, and responsive staff protecting our great - community. 'any thanks, Genevieve Davila Legislative Assistant Office of Senator Kathy Saltzman Genevieve.Davila @Senate.MN 651 - 296 -4166 1 -A •zov-) = kA 03S- V- � &iC+S�cL SAWN C1'ts�sµ.. �a4(2�4a�n�A�C. Pra} S{�'NDGtJ Dear Edina Neighbors, Last weekends Edina Homecoming festivities started like many others: parades, tailgates, friends, neighbors. As an alumna of Edina High School (Class of 1999) I have enjoyed taking part in these events, now many years after my graduation. This year's festivities were tainted by an unnecessary and cruel event. My little sister, who is a sophomore at EHS, was physically assaulted by some young boys who were throwing objects out of a moving SLTV. Her eyes were swollen shut from the impact on her face and her_homecoming experience will forever be ruined. The shock and amazement of all our neighbors has prompted me to write this letter and ask for any information the community might have on these juveniles who so cowardly left my sister on the ground with a smirk and a laugh. This is our community, our city and never before have I lacked Edina spirit. I would also like to take this opportunity to thank the Edina Police department and Fire Rescue who responded within minutes and took every necessary step to ensure that my sister was comforted and transported rapidly to the hospital. They were as shocked and appalled at this behavior and are doing everything in their power to apprehend the kids that did this. I hope that this letter makes parents, kids, and community members aware of how important it is to be responsible citizens. Sincerely, Genevieve Davila Edina Resident Page 1 of 2 Mike Siitari From: Swenson, Sara [SarSwenson @edina.k12.mn.us] Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 11:06 AM To: Mike Siitari Subject: Kudos to Officer Rygg Chief Sittari, Yesterday there was a reenactment of a Rasmussen .hearing. at Edina High School for all 9t', grade government students, and the Contemporary Issues and Chemical Awareness classes at EHS. As part of the case, a police offer testifies about the arrest and evidence found. Officer Jim Rygg graciously agreed to play that role and. did so with an Oscar worthy performance. The students from both South View and Valley View Middle Schools were delighted to see him and had many questions about his role in the "arrest" of the defendant. Please know how much Officer Rygg's help with this event is appreciated! Sincerely, Sara Swenson Sara Swenson Librarian Edina High School Edina, MN 55439 sarswenson@edina.1k12.mn.us Info about yesterday's reenactment: Nancy Peters Fourth Judicial District Public Affairs 10/29/2007 612 - 348 -5022 612 -801 -7583 nangy.peters@courts.state.mn.us Rasmussen Hearing at Edina High School Mike Siitari 0m: Molly Anderson int: Monday, October 08, 2007 3:18 PM To: Mike Siitari Subject: FW: Thank you /commendation - - - -- Original Message---- - From: James Siefkes (mailto:gadflyjim @visi.com] Sent: Monday, October 08, 2007 2:56 PM To: Molly Anderson Subject: Thank you /commendation Dear Chief Siitari: Off► c,�. � Ric. C A�- � -Sc�tJ I write this letter to express appreciation to the Edina Police Department, and especially officer Eric Carlson and his partner (I did not get his name), for your timely help and assistance in locating my wife who who is a victim of Alzheimer's disease and wandered into the web of pathways at /near Centennial Lakes Park Sunday afternoon. I called 911 at 1:45 p.m. to report her missing. Shortly thereafter officer Carlson arrived on the scene and took information and data and personally did an on foot area search. His partner, to whom I am also grateful who with the service of a park golf cart explored at length the possible pathways she may have wandered. The Richfield police were informed had she wandered into Richfield and members of my family joined in the search all to no avail. By 3:30 Officer Carlson returned to my citing post at Centennial Lakes Central Building and took information o file a missing person's report. About 5:30 p.m. officer Carlson reported that an Edina Citizen living in one of the Yorktown Townhouses had called in to the police that a woman was in the lobby of the townhouse and appeared lost. Officer Carlson responded to the call and identified.her has my wife and then called and notified me, and delivered her to me and her waiting family at Centennial Lakes Park. What a relief and expression of gratitude from me, my wife, and family for the skills, hospitality, courtesy and the assistance of the Edina Police Department, and especially Officer Carlson and his partner. I have lived in Edina for 30 plus years and this was not the first time I have used the services of the Edina Police and found the officers to be the very best in quick response, courtesy, skills, and know how of their responsibilites.and duty. It's a comfort when visiting in Edina they are there. Congratulations. Two years ago we moved to The Masonic Homes located in Bloomington, because of my wife's condition. Very sincerely yours, The Rev. James A Siefkes 5247 Ashlar Dr. Bloomington, Mn 55437 P-Q� lC / ( (.,2 /6'7 &Atti. , r-7 ff eu wc ".-h (,2 41,te 1 1Af 4�1 Xl 7 C�A -� k V V\ ce C4 ��r7° J�-�v� /� � � it - f/ �/C �iyC� �C/� 'c: )3�F %i n-i f� Lr —�r�� j='? �r:�)q 611 L - /4 V , / r -7 ( — o ��y OFF o^I NI y ;�- 4 2t 3 Car zhS o h �'f7aci- Taw f tilts co !dale kv-e. Nth e? e-s wr=ze rvtwv . If (29 w LEylrfts E- oy'I Am; s 2amC�c-f j1 nc", /.AL- .0oNAt °t- S tI AM 4aug�i K,G 4�32w-`t 5 wlee,- �av / yS/ /U iry�sccl F `pYj 42[ Z w 4Z �, (r rte c.S'!Qa'� v 4oq 11wle ed, y ^j r7' S /66'C F-7 �i� i= ;! �„ TQ �. /9 -LC., ✓1lL' -P " ��K. ✓�- �� N(� � ��9��G! � J'�- c��11 /y � . &A raA dim rt-%/ Fly^ �dT /YKK ,�oBra h La by z CO rr, CID 4Ms RE61NA L. NEvtt -L.E Kets6ve., K. Pain, tt J� a U� '7 c7 (XI L-A-' — rlal��I y� recd r-a-,f4— 7.rzys ? -902. a p, l- FZ 7- i& z a 91.52- 69 iL r75Z- `iZ` - 0 OS '95Z- 351 -`ll & 45-900- 00Y9 5s�9z6 sus C� (Z Cam - 9 � la 6/= I= r% i} r✓ L� G ! i/ �I y 'V �'= �;� r►i n L- ,= . -r� =� 1=✓� �fi �T}i T� STS % ='�� _T114f L4 3o l Tara LIDI Irl FWAI W U MV u N JW w91��r� MINUTES OF THE Edina Transportation Commission ow F% Thursday, September 20, 2007 Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street .8 Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Les Wanninger, Warren Plante, Marie Thorpe, Jean White, Marc Usem, Geof Workinger, Paul Mooty MEMBERS ABSENT: Hilah Almog, Steve Brown STAFF PRESENT: Jack Sullivan, Sharon Allison I. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chair Wanninger at 6:10 p.m. (delayed due to tornado warning). 11. Public Comment None III. Old Business a. City of Edina Comprehensive Plan — Transportation Chapter Assistant City Engineer Sullivan presented the final draft of the Transportation Chapter for the Comprehensive Plan. He said it is ready to be included in the Comprehensive Plan and therefore, is seeking approval to move it forward. Sullivan said even after approval, the ETC would still have opportunities to make changes, if needed, before the overall plan is approved. Peter Langworthy of WSB and Associates reviewed the revisions which were incorporated into the final draft, except for the Comprehensive Bike Plan, which was just approved last night by the Bike Taskforce. Sullivan said he believes the Bike Plan will go to the Council for initial approval and the Council will then forward it to the ETC for review and insertion into the final Comp Plan. Chair Wanninger said since they may not get an opportunity to comment on the Bike Plan before it goes to Council they should strengthen the Pedestrian /Bicycle section in the Transportation Chapter because the Bike Plan that was presented to them appeared incomplete. The Commission reviewed the final draft of the Transportation Chapter and made various revisions, including adding an Executive Summary to outline what is new in the updated Transportation Chapter. Commissioner Workinger motioned to approve the Transportation Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan with the changes made tonight and ask that a summary of the changes that were made accompany the Transportation Chapter being sent to the Planning Commission Taskforce, and immediately following the meeting, that the ETC receive an updated copy of the Transportation Chapter, including all changes made tonight; and that it is their strong desire that no further consideration of this document, with or without a summary, be given to any other chain of command until it is updated to reflect the changes made tonight. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Thorpe. Commissioner Usem amended the motion to include the ETC simultaneously getting a copy of the summary being sent to the Planning Commission Taskforce. Motion carried. All vote ayes. IV. New Business None V. Approval of Minutes a. Regular Meeting of August 16, 2007 Commissioner Plante motioned to approve the minutes of August 16, 2007, and it was seconded by Commissioner Thorpe. All voted ayes. VI. Planning Commission Update (Commissioner Brown) None VII. Open Discussion Chair Wanninger distributed an updated schedule for the West 70�' Street/ Cornelia Traffic Study through February 2008. The memo will be posted to the website. To facilitate more communication with the public, Chair Wanninger said the website has been updated with information on the West 70th Street/Cornelia Traffic Study and the NE Edina Traffic Study webpage will also be updated with information on the project that has started at 50th Street & Halifax Avenue. He said Commissioner Thorpe will begin writing a summary of each ETC and SAC meetings to be posted to City Extra. VIII. Staff Liaison Comments (Sullivan) a. Benton Avenue /Normandale Blvd Intersection This intersection, over Highway 100, will be modified to include stop signs, restriping and crosswalks. The Valley View Road restriping is completed and staff has been receiving positive feedback. b. Doncaster Way Sidewalk This sidewalk was recently approved by Council and expected construction date is spring 2008. Staff has also asked the School .District to improve their sidewalk leading into the school. The Highlands Neighborhood, east of Doncaster Way, will be reconstructed in 2008 and approval will be sought for a sidewalk that would link with the Doncaster Way sidewalk along Ayshire Blvd to Vernon Avenue'(this is a missing segment from the business /park/schools sidewalk link). c. Halifax Avenue Sidewalk This sidewalk was recently approved by Council and expected construction date is this winter or spring 2008. Meeting adjourned. 2 West 70th Street - Final Paving Schedule To facilitate the final paving of West 70th Street, it is necessary to close the roadway in its entirety on Monday, November 5, 2007. This will be a one -day closure, and once paving is complete, the roadway will be fully open to traffic. The paving schedule is as follows: Stage 1: Pave Brandon Square and U.S. Bank Entrance Friday, November 2, 3:00 p.m. - 6:00 p.m. Stage 2: Pave West 70th Street mainline (eastbound east of Roundabout No. 1 and all of westbound) Monday, November 5, 7:00 a.m. - 3:00 p.m. Stage 3: Pave West 70th Street mainline (eastbound from France Avenue to Roundabout No. 1) Monday, November 5, 3:00 p.m. - 6:00 p.m. This schedule is weather dependent. Should delays occur, the road closures will be moved back one day until the paving is complete. The City of Edina, WSB & Associates, Inc., and Palda & Sons thank you for your cooperation as we work to finish this project. Any questions or concerns regarding this closure can be directed to the project inspector, Chris Hartzell, at 612- 360 -9892, or the construction manager, Brian Connolly, at 763 - 287 -8520. f �. .., Stage 3: Pave West 70th Street mainline (eastbound from France Avenue to Roundabout No. 1) Monday, November 5, 3:00 p.m. - 6:00 p.m. This schedule is weather dependent. Should delays occur, the road closures will be moved back one day until the paving is complete. The City of Edina, WSB & Associates, Inc., and Palda & Sons thank you for your cooperation as we work to finish this project. Any questions or concerns regarding this closure can be directed to the project inspector, Chris Hartzell, at 612- 360 -9892, or the construction manager, Brian Connolly, at 763 - 287 -8520. SEA! PETITION TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL November 5, 2007aE�Ew�jo Type of Improvement requested: Municipal Water System in Morningside WE, THE RESIDENTS OF MORNINGSIDE, are concerned that a growing number of our resident's water is not potable, useable, or adequate according to EPA guidelines & pursuant to independent water testing recently completed. Residents are already bearing costs associated with water pipe problems by having to purchase bottled drinking & cooking water, bathe children at relatives' homes, wash clothing at laundromats, and expend extra money for water testing and property damage. THE POOR QUALITY OF THIS WATER DEMANDS THE FOLLOWING ACTION: • immediate identification of the underlying cause of the poor water quality • a detailed plan outlining the permanent solution and a timeline for implementation • a plan to insure the provision of adequate water until the permanent solution can be implemented This petition is circulated by: Tara Bizily (4005 Lynn Ave., 952 - 922 -0386) Julie Banker_(4000 Lynn Ave., 952 - 929 -4069) Nan Schwappach (4010 Lynn Ave., 952 - 924627) Mary Mason (4012 Lynn Ave., 952 - 927, - a0, Karen Heine (4016 Lynn Ave., 952 - 922 -5780) This petition is supported by the following residents: Property Owner's signature a ; 1. f `/ Exp^enen� z. d problem v Y 7 Experienced problem_ /r�� 3. l�w�,o, rei Experienced problem Property Owner's name (printed) Reported problem Reported problem C44IR6 An�Rr`cNs Reported problem__%,t:::� Property Address & email 40c4 v• L-VIV Al GLJi1PWOA// &ADL.CdAA Owner's Phone `Ic q? Lc- T5 9'_5-a - fd- 6 - s-x sk Property Owner 4. Si Experienced problem 5. S Experienced problem'9 Experienced problem 1 e e p �oblem ' 8 s. 10. ir Prop rty Owner's name (P�, d) 14- �,C I J 1?4 Reported problem Reported problem Li IL, �,1~ i��3L e, Reported problem Reported problem Reported problem] ell / —,7G V c - Y i C.—S L/ Property Address & email 4003 �-Y,,, 4v, Owner's Phone -y�2 Ow 4/ 00f CLj,,n A vv W — aZ °'' x/-165 QC 'bI (A 2fi4(-�41/ 0 CuI .GIB , Ll�g U L> fxn ,pee ced roblem X Reported problem i Experienced problem 1/ Reported problem�� /ten/ 13. CIO-- � � �i��c� � Y/✓ "U All-- ` ✓- Experienced problem Reported problem y�z -YZ4 - CO `vn PETITION TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL November 5, 2007 REG�IVE Type of Improvement requested: Municipal Water System in Morningside ey / 0: . WE, THE RESIDENTS OF MORNINQSIDE'; axe. qgnperned that a growing number of our resident's water is not potable, useable, or adequate according to EPA guidelines & pursuant to independent water testing recently completed. Residents are already bearing costs associated with water pipe problems by having to purchase bottled drinking & cooking water, bathe children at relatives' homes, wash clothing at laundromats, and expend extra money for water testing and property damage. THE POOR QUALITY OF THIS WATER DEMANDS THE FOLLOWING ACTION: • immediate identification of the underlying cause of the poor water quality • a detailed plan outlining the permanent solution and a timeline for implementation • a plan to insure the provision of adequate water until the permanent solution can be implemented This petition is circulated by: Tara Bizily (4005 Lynn Ave., 952 - 922 -0386) Julie Banker (4000 Lynn Ave., 952 - 929 -4069) Nan Schwappach (4010 Lynn Ave., 952-929-4627) Mary Mason (4012 Lynn Ave., 952 - 927 -4627) Karen Heine (4016 Lynn Ave., 952 - 922 -5780) This petition is supported by the following residents: Property Owner's Signature Experienced problem 2. Experienced problem 3. v Experienced problem Property Owner's name Property Address (printed) & email C M0,0� (�CAC, Reported problem RT Iy L. 1 Reported problem (0- L'G L�cib 61 ,G1c Reported problem Owner's Phone c�Z_`l2c, -(-(: � Property Owner's Property 9wner.'s.name Property Address,&- email:' = � . Owner's Phone ` Signature (printed).r T3Gc�K _ 2 `��. ,�]rlmes 4 952 - q29 y6�'D 16,&A), .Avg Experienced problem_ 7 Reported probiem "ar ;te e &6 / 5. Xt ;., c;�s,�PNrH�S 4330 ,6luE AwE,S a r X151- 2g -ES22 pro Experienced bl m Reported protilem C �a n e �/ y / All, /. — -75 J e_ E 4�c5 Experienced problem Reported protilem '' ,•. G�PEA G4 P. E enenced roblem Reported problem 8. - Experienced problem Reported problem 9. Experienced problem Reported- problem - 10. Experienced problem Reported. problem_ 11 »� - - Experienced problem •._ . - --Reported, - problem_ ..•.o,:..:.._ .._..... . 12. _..., Experienced problem p • - ' ' •�- - Reported problem - _•_ . " " 13. _..... _ �.a Experienced problem Reported =problem - S; SEAL 1 ^< -5 PETITION TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL November s, 2007 BY Type of Improvement requested: Municipal Water System in Morningside WE, THE RESIDENTS OF MORNINGSIDE, are concerned that a growing number of our resident's water is not potable, useable, or adequate according to EPA guidelines & pursuant to independent water testing recently completed. Residents are already bearing costs associated with water pipe problems by having to purchase bottled drinking & cooking water, bathe-children at relatives' homes, wash clothing at laundromats, and expend extra money for water testing and property damage. THE POOR QUALITY OF THIS WATER DEMANDS THE FOLLOWING ACTION: • immediate identification of the underlying cause of the poor water quality • a detailed plan outlining the permanent solution and a timeline for implementation • a plan to insure the provision of adequate water until the permanent solution can be implemented This petition is circulated by: Tara Bizily (4005 Lynn Ave., 952 - 922 -0386) Julie Banker (4000 Lynn Ave., 952 - 929 -4069) Nan Schwappach (4010 Lynn Ave., 952 - 929 -4627) Mary Mason (4012 Lynn Ave., 952 - 927 -4627) Karen Heine (4016 Lynn Ave., 952- 922 -5780) This petition is supported by the following residents: Property Owner's natu , M Experienced problem Experienced problem / Property Owner's name (pri ed) , M -1 ,I1,6 6n)knes Avesa Reported problem Reported problem ExperAwked problem Reported problem Property Address & email /�/f- —50. Owner's Phone vJ SY 27.-x. Property Owner's X!T—� 4. Experienced problem Experienced problem Experienced problem 7. EWerienoe "roble 8. Experienced problem 9. 4Eedenced problem :L6 Experienced problem ?-ICLAYj�� Experienced problem 12.- z. r�Ewxpeerienced problem 13. 4UV � en Y�-4- 01"__.' Experienced problem Property Owner's name (printed) Reported problem ` n Reported problem doll Re rted problem Reported oblem Reported problem G� Reported problem �.V 15 �' n Reported problem_ t Reported problem Reported problem Z-AN'ET LEA af\�. Reported problem Property Address S email Owner's Phone 7 —�z3Z �-eti -yw� z � Cry -4p 0 ✓t UZZ C�uu� A1 eV `5 i �✓^�1.'I '•� V l IQ I + Cif -V � I L .tom 1 lc� l Gi svCSYY'�� c% rani �5 . 'Y000 &f4P 4-005 C0024ME5. 50 0621 y .SEAL "n PETITION TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL November 5, 2007 "5 '�� RED"1oIED Type of Improvement requested: Municipal Water System in Morningside By WE, THE RESIDENTS OF MORNINGSIDE, are concerned that a growing number of our resident's water is not potable, useable, or adequate according to EPA guidelines & pursuant to independent water testing recently completed. Residents are already bearing costs associated with water pipe problems by having to purchase bottled drinking & cooking water, bathe children at relatives' homes, wash clothing at laundromats, and expend extra money for water testing and property damage. THE POOR QUALITY OF THIS WATER DEMANDS THE FOLLOWING ACTION: • immediate identification of the underlying cause of the poor water quality • a detailed plan outlining the permanent solution and a timeline for implementation • a plan to insure the provision of adequate water until the permanent solution can be implemented This petition is circulated by: Tara Bizily (4005 Lynn Ave., 952 - 922 -0386) Julie Banker (4000 Lynn Ave., 952 - 929 -4069) Nan Schwappach (4010 Lynn Ave., 952 - 929 -4627) Mary Mason (4012 Lynn Ave., 952 - 927 -4627) Karen Heine (4016 Lynn Ave., 952 - 922 -5780) This petition is supported by the following residents: Property Owner's Signature Experienced problem / 2. xperienced pr 3 Experienced problem Property Owner's name (printe Reported problem Property Address & email Owner's Phone Za.u.r.- � olf omk ��91 Reported problem Reported problem Property Owner's Property Owner's name Sic nat re AA (printed) a. ,r►^ ,,rC �Y1ad'Tiln D, fYluosc_ E nced problem r ' Reported problem - s. -1 g -P►ZSo� Experienced problem Reported problem 6. Experienced problem Experienced problem A Experienced problem 0 Experienced problem 10. Experienced problem 11. Experienced problem 12. Experienced problem 13. Experienced problem Reported problem Reported problem Reported problem Reported problem Reported problem_ Reported problem Reported problem Reported problem Property Address & email MON►C5@- IID� I•�, n1:wb ooe Owner's Phone \,CITY C� �o SEAL PETITION TO THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL November 5, 2007 -5,1,,107 Type of Improvement requested: Municipal Water System in Morningside RECEIVED RV WE, THE RESIDENTS OF MORNINGSIDE, are concerned that a growing number of our resident's water is not potable, useable, or adequate according to EPA guidelines & pursuant to independent water testing recently completed. Residents are already bearing costs associated with water pipe problems by having to purchase bottled drinking & cooking water, bathe children at relatives' homes, wash clothing at laundromats, and expend extra money for water testing and property damage. THE POOR QUALITY OF THIS WATER DEMANDS THE FOLLOWING ACTION: • immediate identification of the underlying cause of the poor water quality • a detailed plan outlining the permanent solution and a timeline for implementation • a plan to insure the provision of adequate water until the permanent solution can be implemented This petition is circulated by: Tara Bizily (4005 Lynn Ave., 952 - 922 -0386) Julie Banker (4000 Lynn Ave., 952 - 929 -4069) Nan Schwappach (4010 Lynn Ave., 952 - 929 -4627) Mary Mason (4012 Lynn Ave., 952 - 927 -4627) Karen Heine (4016 Lynn Ave., 952 - 922 -5780) This petition is supported by the following residents: Property Owner's Signature E pe enced pro le 2. Experienced problem 3. Experienced problem Property Owner's name Property Address Owner's Phone (printed) & email 2 b )2D64 �-5/g44 4117 kloui, sylgK��� Reported problem Mar Reported problem Reported problem n,bw;lkeh;n5c raMrtist.tiot�s -Z: �Z 1 �-1 o d6 y020 k.,, I 1u , — CA _j `a.v Property Owner's Property Owner's name Property Address & email Owner's Phone Signature (printed) 4. Experienced problem Reported problem 5. Experienced problem Reported problem 6. Experienced problem Reported problem 7. Experienced problem Reported problem 8. -. Experienced problem Reported problem 9. Experienced problem Reported problem 10. Experienced problem Reported problem_ 11. Experienced problem Reported problem 12. Experienced problem Reported problem 13. Experienced problem Reported problem