Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-12-18_COUNCIL MEETINGEDINA CITY COUNCIL MEETING PROCEDURES During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public comment after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to speak on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your comments are relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public blearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: • Individuals must limit their presentations to three minutes. The Mayor will modify presentation times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit comments to the matter under consideration. • In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. During "Public Comments," the Mayor will ask to hear from those in attendance who would like to speak about something not on the agenda. Individuals must limit their presentations to three minutes and cannot speak to an issue for which -a public hearing was previously held and closed or a matter scheduled for a future hearing. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments. Instead, the Council might direct the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 18, 2007 7:00 P.M. RnTT CAT T ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY • I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of December 4, 2007 II. ADTOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of December 4, 2007 and Work Session of December 4, 2007 and Truth In Taxation Hearing of December 3, 2007 Agenda /Edina City Council December 18, 2007 Page 2 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND REPORTS ON PLANNING MATTERS - Zoning Ordinances: First Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three Council members except that a rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Second Reading requires affirmative rollcall votes of three of Council to pass except rezoning from residential to non - residential requires four affirmative votes. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall votes of four members of Council to pass. Final Development Plan Approval of Property Zoned Planned District: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required passing. Conditional Use Permit: Affirmative rollcall vote of three Council members required to pass. Variance Appeal: Favorable rollcall of Council Members present to uphold or deny appeal A. PUBLIC HEARING: PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PRELIMINARY REZONING -77th & Parklawn Area for Wayzata Properties (Gateway) III. PUBLIC COMMENT IV. ORDINANCES - First Reading: Requires offering of Ordinance only. Second Reading: Favorable rollcall vote of three Council Members to pass. Waiver of Second Reading: Affirmative rollcall vote of four Council Members to pass. A. FIRST READING - ORDINANCE NO. 2007 -21 Amending Section 180 of the City Code to Require Removal of Members from Boards and Commissions Who Fail to Comply with Attendance Requirements V. REPORTS/ RECOMMENDATIONS # A. Set Special Assessment Hearing Date (115108) For Garbage and Refuse Removal No. REF-07 * B. Traffic Safety Report of December 5, 2007 * C. Labor Contract Local 320 Union - Public Safety Dispatchers D. Resolution No. 2007 -131 Accepting Various Donations E. Annual Reappointments to Boards, Commissions & Committees F. Indemnity Agreement with Opus VI. FINANCE • A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated December 6, 2007 TOTAL $620,375.49; and December 13, 2007 TOTAL $1,055,45568 and for Credit Card Transactions TOTAL $2,281.56. Agenda /Edina City Council December 18, 2007 Page 3 B. PUBLIC HEARING - RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -133 Adopting the 2008 Operating Budget and Setting the 2008 Tax Levy C. RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -132 - Year 2007 Park and Recreation Fees and Charges D. SECOND READING - ORDINANCE NO. 2007 -19 Amending Code Section 185 - Increasing Certain Fees E. FIRST READING - ORDINANCE NO. 2007 -20 Amending Utility Rates for 2008 F. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM 2008 -2012 VII. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS VIII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS IX. MANAGER'S MISCELLANEOUS ITEM The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952-927-886172 hours in advance of the meeting. Mon Dec 24 Tues Dec 25 Mon Dec 31 Tues Jan 1 Tues Jan 2 Wed Jan 2 Tues Jan 15 Tues Jan 15 Mon Jan 21 Tues Jan 22 Mon Feb 4 Tues Feb 5 Mon Feb 18 Tues Feb 19 Tues Feb 26 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS CHRISTMAS EVE HOLIDAY OBSERVED- City Hall Closed CHRISTMAS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed NEW YEAR'S DAY EVE HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closes at noon NEW YEAR'S DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Work Session 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Work Session 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS REV. MARTIN LUTHER KING HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Study Session - To be determined 7:00 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS PRECINCT CAUCUSES - NO MEETINGS HELD THIS DATE PRESIDENTS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED - City Hall Closed Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Study Session - To be determined 11:30 A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL DECEMBER 4, 2007 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Swenson approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF NOVEMBER 20, 2007, WORK SESSION OF NOVEMBER 20, 2007, AND STUDY SESSION OF OCTOBER 23, 2007, APPROVED Member Masica made a motion approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of November 20, 2007, Work Session of November 20, 2007, and Study Session of October 23, 2007. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -130 APPROVING IMPROVEMENT NO. A -213 & IMPROVEMENT NO. A -214 COUNTRY CLUB AREA SEWER, WATER AND STREET RECONSTRUCTION Affidavits of Notice were presented, approved and ordered placed on file. Engineer Presentation Engineer Houle stated the proposed improvements were staff initiated in 2005 to address utility concerns within the Edina Country Club District. A public hearing was held on July 19, 2005. At that public hearing the City Council decided to delay the project until a transportation plan was adopted for the Northeast Area of Edina. The Edina Transportation Commission completed the Northeast Edina Transportation Study (NEETS) in 2006. The Edina City Council adopted the NEETS in 2006. Mr. Houle said the proposed project would involve reconstructing the water main system, repairing and upgrading the sanitary sewer system, upgrading the storm sewer system, replacing the street lighting system, and reconstructing the roadway. He said all components of the NEETS, as they relate to the Country Club District, have been incorporated into this proposal. Mr. Houle reported the following groups have reviewed the attached proposal: • Edina Transportation Commission - recommendation of plan was consistent with NEETS, see attached draft minutes. • Edina Bike Task Force - letter attached to Feasibility Study and new letter attached to report. Page 1 Minutes/Edina City Council/December 4, 2007 • Edina School Bus - email attached to Feasibility Study. • Edina Fire Department - letter attached to Feasibility Study. • Edina Preservation Board - recommended Certificate of Appropriateness, draft minutes attached to Feasibility Study. Mr. Houle explained staff was proposing a two -year staged reconstruction, with the northerly portion of the Country Club being reconstructed in 2008 and the southerly portion being reconstructed in 2009. He reported the estimated project cost was $19,639,000; which included all utility repairs and upgrades and all assessed costs. The special assessment amount for this project was estimated to be $5,078,000 for Improvement Area A -213 and $4,579,000 for Improvement Area A -214, which would be approximately $18,210 and $22,900, respectively, per residential equivalent unit (REU). Mr. Houle said if homeowners replaced their own sanitary sewer service pipes, they would respectively receive a credit of either $6,000 or $6,400. He noted a revised Feasibility Study was included in the Council's packets, along with all correspondence received to date. Mr. Houle concluded, staff analyzed the project and felt that the project was feasible from an engineering standpoint. He introduced Paul Pasko of Short Elliot Hendrickson, Inc., the City's consultant engineer for the improvement projects. Paul Pasko, Short Elliot Hendrickson, Inc., using video and a PowerPoint presentation, reviewed the proposed project. He stated that since 1989 there had been 271 trunk water main repairs and 25 trunk sanitary sewer blockages. Mr. Pasko said the private water mains and sanitary sewer service pipes were the same age as the City's utility pipes and likely in the same condition. He stated the streets in the Country Club district were in poor condition. The street lights in the neighborhood were approximately 40 years old and also in need of replacement. Mr. Pasko noted the Northeast Edina Transportation Study had outlined some traffic calming measures that included: speed humps, raised crosswalks, center island narrowing, narrowing of the intersections, realignment of the intersections, traffic circles, and raised intersections. He said the proposed measures had been incorporated into the project. Mr. Pasko said that due to the width of the streets, it was being recommended that Wooddale Avenue be designated as the "Share the Road" bike route through the area. He added that all of the items had been incorporated into a comprehensive reconstruction project that would be staged over a two -year period. The Council's questions included: request for description of how the manholes and storm sewer would function, bike lane designation, how homeowner's would obtain the "credit" for replacing their own sewer service pipe, how would costs increase if utility work was not funded by the City, what caused the large cost increase from 2005, request for an explanation of "Share the Road" bike lane concept, request as to how the longer response times would be handled by the Edina Fire Department with the proposed traffic calming measures, and why were two project areas being used for assessments. Staff and consultants answered the questions as follows: the manholes and storm sewer would act as grit chambers and attempt to capture some of the debris before the storm water went into the creek, the "Share the Road" concept was decided upon due to the width of the street, the parking on the streets and challenges with trying to move cyclists from one street to another. It was explained that one of the goals of the reconstruction project was to keep Page 2 Minutes/Edina City Council/December 4, 2007 the right -of -way from being dug up for several years; therefore, the requirement for the replacement of the sewer service pipes was included. If a property owner had pulled a permit within the last fifteen years and a final inspection was shown on City records, that property would receive a credit. The cost of the improvement would double if the City was not paying for the utility work being completed. The two residential equivalent units were developed based upon the lot sizes. Costs for the project have increased as a result of Hurricane Katrina which closed down several oil refineries raising the cost of shipping materials, as well as raising the cost of any petroleum based product. In addition, the cost of copper wiring has greatly increased in the past two years. Also the great need for infrastructure improvements in the hurricane ravaged area increases the costs of competing projects in other areas. It was also pointed out that when estimating proposed project costs, very conservative estimates were used, but it was hoped that favorable bids would be received. The Fire Chief explained that the goal for emergency vehicle response was eight minutes or less ninety percent of the time. The proposed traffic calming would increase response time by somewhere between three and twenty -seven seconds, however, Edina's current response time was averaging about four minutes. Public Comment Jack Boyer, 4605 Arden Avenue, stated he thought it was wrong to expect residents to bear burden of replacing infrastructure. Jonathan Gross, 4208 Grimes, questioned the proposed traffic calming measures. He added the entire city should not pay for the traffic calming. Lee McGrath, 4619 Moorland Avenue, questioned whether any cost saving measures had been researched. Margaret Hoppmann, 4602 Moorland Avenue, said the improvement would benefit the entire City and because of the size of the expense to the homeowners it should be shared with all residents. Matthew Pierre, 4618 Bruce Avenue, asked about the criteria for special assessments and how the 50/50 split had been derived. He also asked about plans for protection of the mature trees in the affected neighborhood. Todd Roddis, 4928 Arden Avenue, asked about the 2005 projections of potential increased maintenance costs compare to the actual costs experienced. Tom Dougherty, 4911 Sunnyside Road, stated that in his opinion, Sunnyside Road west of Browndale does not need reconstruction. He stated the cost of the assessment may not exceed the value added. Bruce Christiansen, 4515 Browndale, objected to the proposed traffic calming measures. David Pearson, 4513 Browndale Avenue, stated he was shocked at the increased cost of the project. He requested the City look at how the project costs will be funded. Page 3 Minutes/Edina City Council/December 4, 2007 Spud Carpenter, 4356 Oakdale Avenue, disagreed with the proposed traffic calming measures and expressed concern with their negative impact on response time of emergency vehicles. Paul Laederach, 4633 Bruce Avenue, stated he was a senior citizen on fixed income and that over the life of the ten year term of the assessment he will be paying $36,000 for the proposed $18,000 improvement. Charles Anderson, 4616 Browndale, questioned the sidewalk in the proposed improvement. Nancy Jarrett, 4500 Browndale Avenue, asked that the street light replacement be explained and also why cost increases in Minnesota were tied to Hurricane Katrina. Following the public comments; the Council had the staff and consultants answer all the questions raised by the speakers. Motion by Member Masica, seconded by Member Swenson to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Following the Council's discussion,, Member Swenson made a motion introducing and moving the approval of Resolution No. 2007 -130 receiving the feasibility report for Improvement No. A -213 and Improvement No. A -214, ordering Improvement No. A -213 and Improvement No. A -214, County Club Area Sewer Water and Street Reconstruction, appointing the City Engineer, as the engineer for the project, and authorizing preparation of plans and specifications, and advertisement for bids. Member Housh seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *HEARING DATE SET OF DECEMBER 18, 2007, FOR PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW, 77m STREET & PARKLAWN AVENUE, WAYZATA PROPERTIES (GATEWAY AREA) Motion made by Member Masica and seconded by Member Swenson setting December 18, 2007, as hearing date for Preliminary Development Plan Review, 77th Street & Parklawn Avenue, Wayzata Properties (Gateway Area) Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. ORDINANCE NO. 2007 -17 ADOPTED AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 850.11 REGARDING BUILDING HEGIHT IN THE R -1 ZONING DISTRICT Planner Teague reviewed the changes made to Ordinance No. 2007 -17 at the direction of the Council when the ordinance was granted first reading, November 20, 2007: • The standards have been applied to duplexes as well as single - family houses; • If a split level dwelling gets torn down and a new home built, the new first floor elevation must not be more than one foot above the front entry elevation of the home that was torn down. • A definition of split level was added. Page 4 Minutes/Edina City CounciWDecember 4, 2007 The Council discussed the ordinance and suggested some changes to the language in Section 2 that would amend Subsection 850.11 subd. 7, along with correction of a typo. There was a question regarding correspondence from a resident living in the flood plain that would be affected by the new regulation. Mr. Teague explained the resident could apply for a variance with their hardship being the location of their home in the floodpldin. Following discussion, Member Bennett made a motion granting second reading to Ordinance No. 2007 -17 amending Section 850.11 regarding building height in the R -1 Zoning District. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ORDINANCE NO. 2007 -18 ESTABLISHING A TEMPORARY MORATORIUM ON DEMOLITION Mayor Hovland explained that on the 20th of November the Council took over two hours of testimony regarding a moratorium on demolitions within Edina. He noted the public hearing had been closed November 20, 2007. Staff was directed to prepare an ordinance that would enact a temporary demolition moratorium for consideration by the Council. Since the November 20th meeting, Mayor Hovland noted the Council had received many communications both by phone and in writing from constituents stating their opinion for or against any type of moratorium. He stated the Council would be accepting testimony on the issue at the current meeting, but would limit total testimony to forty minutes and limit each speaker to two minutes. Further, he asked that persons who testified at the previous meeting not speak in order to allow more people to voice their opinions. Mr. Hughes noted the Council, at their November 20, 2007, meeting directed staff to prepare a moratorium ordinance with respect to the demolition of single family dwellings. Mr. Hughes said the City Attorney prepared an ordinance modeled after the moratorium ordinance currently in effect for the Country Club district of Edina. He said the proposed moratorium would prohibit the demolition of single family dwellings anywhere in Edina during the moratorium which would last until April 15, 2008. Mr. Hughes said the proposed moratorium ordinance defined demolition as a tear down or removal of a dwelling, or the physical alteration of the dwelling such that 50% of more of the surface area of the existing exterior walls in the aggregate were removed. The moratorium would not affect demolitions for which a permit or variance had been applied for prior to the date of enactment. It would not restrict issuance of new building permits for new homes on vacant lots. Mr. Hughes stated the staff would not recommend imposing a moratorium on only certain parts of the City or only on certain lots, rather if enacted the moratorium should be applied to all single family dwelling unit lots within the community. Mayor Hovland called for public comment. Public Comment John Bold, 4608 Merilane, opposed a moratorium Page 5 Minutes/Edina City Council/December 4, 2007 Jim Aufderheide, 5325 West 62nd Street opposed a moratorium. Matt Freeman, Bond Companies, 4351200 Street East Prior Lake, opposed a moratorium. Art Heiam, 5205 Ridgewod Drive, opposed a moratorium. Jill Larson, 5324 Oaklawn Avenue supported a moratorium. Paul Ferry, 5006 Bruce Avenue, opposed a moratorium. Sherrilynn Mahowald, 4330 West 42nd Street, supported a moratorium. Beth Andrews 6045 High Point Road, Shoreview, realtor, on behalf of clients, 3508 West 55th Street opposed a moratorium. Lee McGrath, 4619 Moorland Avenue, opposed a moratorium. Barry Berg, 600 2nd Street, Minneapolis, realtor, opposed a moratorium. Calvin Vaubel, 5318 Oaklawn Avenue, supported a moratorium. Susan Gruidl, 4217 West 42nd Street, opposed a moratorium. Ted Allen, 5216 Halifax Avenue, opposed a moratorium. Tom Lund 5319 Oaklawn Avenue, supported a moratorium. Steve Ayres, 19808 Dawson Lane, Farmington, opposed a moratorium. Margaret Burt, 3300 West 55th Street, opposed a moratorium. The Council each stated their opinions and positions on the proposed moratorium after listening to the public comments. They acknowledged the difficulty of the issues relative to massing and stated their intention to proceed with regulatory changes in the near future. Mayor Hovland called the question asking if there was a motion to adopt the proposed moratorium ordinance. Member Masica made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett to adopt the ordinance. Mayor Hovland clarified he asked whether anyone would move adopting the moratorium ordinance. Member Masica withdrew her motion and Member Bennett withdrew her second, whereupon, Mayor Hovland stated the matter failed for lack of a motion. CONCERN OF RESIDENTS Gene Persha, 6917 Cornelia Drive, stated he felt the Council needed to allow citizens a greater voice in government. No formal Council action was taken. Page 6 Minutes/Edina City Council/December 4, 2007 RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -128 ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Masica introduced Resolution No. 2007 -128 accepting various donations. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Member Masica made a motion and Member Swenson seconded the motion approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated November 21, 2007, and consisting of 21 pages: General Fund $109,908.20; CDBG Fund $81,827.00; Communications Fund $8,553.51; Working Capital Fund $663,179.54, Construction Fund $172,472.58; Art Center Fund $387.93; Golf Dome Fund $1 „733.38; Aquatic Center Fund $37.28; Golf Course Fund $1,796.33; Ice Arena Fund $1695.03, Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $4,813.56; Liquor Fund $197,933.08; Utility Fund $38,024.33, Storm Sewer Fund $58,830.92; PSTF Agency Fund $1,562.65; TOTAL $1,342,755.32, and for approval of payment of claims dated November 29, 2007, and consisting of 27 pages: General Fund $370,481.85; Communications Fund $2,437.22, Working Capital Fund $859,036.36; Construction Fund $6,484.22, Art Center Fund $2,747.30, Golf Dome Fund $125.06; Aquatic Center Fund $137.03; Golf Course Fund $8,854.36; Ice Arena Fund $271.83; Edinborough/Centennial Lakes Fund $25,171.88; Liquor Fund $116,120.13; Utility Fund $85,043.82, Storm Sewer Fund $10,056.38; TOTAL 1,486,967.44. Motion carried on rollcall vote - five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING HELD ON LIQUOR FEES, ORDINANCE NO. 2007 -19 GRANTED FIRST READING AMENDING CODE SECTION 185 INCREASING CERTAIN FEES Mr. Hughes reviewed the proposed ordinance amendment increasing certain fees. He noted the consideration of the proposed amendment included a public hearing on the 2008 proposed liquor fees which was required under statute. Mr. Hughes said the required 30 day notice had been sent to all liquor licensees. He gave a general overview of the proposed amendment to Code Section 185, focusing on the increases in some liquor license fees. No one appeared for public comment. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Swenson made a motion to grant first reading to Ordinance No. 2007 -19, Amending Code Section 185, increasing certain fees. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -125 APPROVED - YEAR 2008 PARK AND RECREATION FEES AND CHARGES Mr. Hughes indicated fee increases for 2008 for the Park and Recreation Page 7 Minutes/Edina City Council/December 4, 2007 Department were minimal with most fees not changing from 2007. He reminded the Council, following a question by Member Swenson, that the Edina Foundation has set up a 'grant in aid' or scholarship fund for financially challenged families. The Park Department has an application for this anonymous help as well as for help with transportation. The Council questioned why the fee for residents and non residents was proposed at the same rate for the Edinborough Play Park for 2008. Mr. Hughes suggested Council approve all fees except the one in question. Member Swenson made a motion approving Resolution No. 2007 -125, Year 2008 Park and Recreation Fees and Charges excluding the Edinborough Play Park Fees. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -126 APPROVED - YEAR 2008 AMBULANCE FEES Member Housh introduced Resolution No. 2007 -126, Year 2008 Ambulance Fees and moved adoption. Member Bennett seconded the motion. . Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -127 APPROVED - YEAR 2008 MISCELLANEOUS FEES Mr. Hughes indicated that fees deemed as miscellaneous were mainly from the Fire Department and one from the Planning Department. Member Swenson introduced Resolution No. 2007 -127 Year 2008 Miscellaneous Fees, and moved adoption. Member Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 10:55 P.M. Respectfully submitted, Page 8 City Clerk MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY DECEMBER 4, 2007 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Chair Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Swenson and seconded by Commissioner Housh approving the Consent Agenda for the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY NOVEMBER 20, 2007, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Swenson and seconded by Commissioner Housh approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority from November 20, 2007. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. There being no further business on the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Agenda, Chair Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 7:05 p.m. RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -03 ADOPTED AUTHORIZING SALE OF REVENUE BONDS — VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA-- Affidavits of Notice were presented approved and ordered placed on file. Executive Director Hughes noted the HRA on November 20, 2007, set a public hearing date to consider the issuance of revenue bonds on behalf of the Volunteers of America (VOA). If approved the proceeds of the bond issue will be used by the VOA to acquire a new corporate headquarters building at 7625 Metro Boulevard in Edina. Mr. Hughes noted that according to the City's tax exempt revenue bond financing guidelines the City will be paid an issuance fee of 1/2% of the principal amount of the bond issue. He said other out of pocket costs of the City will be reimbursed if the HRA authorizes the bond sale. Mr. Hughes also said if the HRA authorized the sale, the City Council must also adopt a resolution authorizing the issuance. The Commissioners questioned whether issuing the revenue bond would impact the City of Edina's bond rating or if the City would assume any liability for the bonds. Mr. Hughes stated the bonds would not affect Edina's bond rating and there was no liability to the City for the issue. Public Comment No one appeared to comment. Commissioner Housh made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Bennett to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Commissioner Swenson made a motion introducing Resolution No. 2007 -03 and moved its adoption authorizing the sale of a revenue note pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.152 to 469.1651, as amended at the request of Volunteers of America in the principal amount of $2,500,000, and approving forms of documents in connection therewith. Commissioner Housh seconded the motion Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, the Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:09 p.m. Executive Director MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL ON DECEMBER 3, 2007 AT 5:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. TRUTH IN TAXATION PUBLIC HEARING HELD FOR PROPOSED 2008 CITY BUDGET Pursuant to published notice given; the Edina City Council conducted a public hearing on the proposed property tax increase in the 2008 Budget for the City of Edina. Mayor Hovland stated the purpose of the Truth in Taxation hearing would focus on the proposed 2008 City of Edina Budget. The budget review would relate to the monies' source and how they would be expended on the various functions and services of the City. Residents with questions relating to the valuation placed on their homes should plan to appear at the Board of Review in the spring of 2008. Manager Hughes introduced a short video entitled 14 Reasons Property Taxes Go Up or Down produced by the League of MN Cities, the Association of MN Counties, and the MN School Boards Association. Mr. Hughes said filming and technical work on the video was done by Tremendous Entertainment 2006. Following the video, Assistant Finance Director Roggeman reviewed the 2008 proposed expenditures of $30,536.263. He explained this would be an increase of $1,647,597 or approximately 5.70 %. Mr. Hughes noted that $455,641 of the increase represented the first year's debt service on bonds issued to finance the reconstruction of Fire Station #1.. Mr. Hughes said the City's tax revenues must increase $1,084,841 or 5.18% from 2007 to support the proposed expenditures. Public Comment No one appeared to offer comment. The Council briefly discussed the relationship between values and property taxes, asked questions including some about the operation of City Enterprises and reviewed that the final 2008 Operating Budget would be adopted at the regular meeting of the Council on December 18, 2007. Member Swenson made a motion to close the Truth in Taxation Hearing. Member Masica seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Masica made a motion cancelling the December 10, 2007, continuation date for the 2008 Truth in Taxation hearing. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Mayor Hovland adjourned the meeting at 5:46 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Page 1 City Clerk MINUTES OF THE JOINT WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL DECEMBER 4, 2007 5:00 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:15 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were: Members Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff present included: Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Cary Teague, City Planner; Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager; Ceil Smith, Assistant to the City Manager; Jennifer Bennerotte, Communications & Marketing Director; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Mayor Hovland said the purpose of the special work session was to preliminarily review the official controls relative to massing. Manager Hughes said staff, after being directed at the last Council meeting to prepare a moratorium ordinance, reviewed work tasks that could be undertaken relative to the massing issue. He noted that there was a need to keep in mind whatever was accomplished, must be completed by April 15th when the existing moratorium in the Country Club District would end. Mr. Hughes said staff believed issues that were of a long term nature included: research and development of design review criteria; neighborhood character regulations and definitions, and development of multiple R -1 zoning districts. He said that in the short term staff could, with the help of a consultant, put together some modeling demonstrating the impact of various Floor Area Ratio (FAR) options, draft some kind of hard surface coverage regulations, and review the Code's overall height regulations, returning to the Council with options at their second January meeting. Member Masica related the results of her meetings with residents, as well as builders and realtors where they reviewed Lon Oberpiller's Neighborhood Appropriate Scaling which she briefly stated was based on FAR and the average area of structures within a defined neighborhood also using some type of escalator that would still need to be determined. Member Masica said the persons who took part in the two meetings were amenable to the Neighborhood Scaling. The Council and staff discussed the issues involved in massing including FAR and variations of FAR, whether or not an accurate footprint of existing homes existed in City records, sloping and walk -out lots, criteria must be objective vs. subjective in determining regulations, developing neighborhood definitions, tying building height regulations to lot size, difficulty of implementation of a design review committee, hard surface coverage and total building height. Following the discussion of the issues surrounding massing, the Council discussed how to proceed with public comment on the moratorium issue. Their consensus was they would take comment for forty minutes, allowing each speaker two minutes, limiting comment to persons who had not previously addressed the Council. In addition, the Mayor would moderate allowing both sides of the issue to speak. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at approximately 6:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra Mangen, City Clerk i` To: Mayor & City Council From: Cary Teague Planning Director Date: December 18, 2008 Subject: Wayzata Properties is requesting a Preliminary Development Plan review and rezoning for the Pentagon Park area along 77th Street. (See project location on page Al.) Deadline for a city decision: January 15, 2008 KLFUK'l %KLCL)MMLN UA'1 lUN Agenda Item II.A. Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ® Resolution Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommended Action: Approve the Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning. Introduction The applicant is proposing to tear down the buildings on the Pentagon Tower and Pentagon Quads site and build 634 senior housing units, an 80,000 square foot hotel, three office towers that would total 737,000 square feet, and two above ground parking structures. The Pentagon Tower and Quad sites contain 660,500 square feet of office space today. Included in the project area are Burgundy Place, Walsh Title and 7600 Parklawn office building, which would remain. (See narrative on pages A4 -A14, and the development plan book.) The total site area is 43.18 acres. The proposal before the City Council is a Preliminary Development Plan review. Ultimately, the request would require the following: 1. A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Office to Mixed Use. The mixed use designation would allow office, retail and residential uses. 2. A Rezoning from Planned Commercial District (PCD -2) and Planned Office District (POD) to Mixed Development District 6. (MDD -6.) 3. An Overall Development Plan for the entire project. 4. A Zoning Ordinance Amendment for the MDD -6 District to reduce the minimum acreage amount from 50 acres to 20 acres. 5. Final Development Plans for each site. In order to obtain the above mentioned approvals, the applicant must go through a three step process. That process is as follows: Preliminary Development Plan. A preliminary development plan is a review by the Planning Commission and City Council, in which approval simply allows the applicant to prepare an Overall Development Plan. Approval of the preliminary development plan requires a three- fifths vote of the City Council, but does not guarantee approval of a comprehensive guide plan change, rezoning or overall development plan. 2. Overall Development Plan. The overall development plan would be the official appr oval/ denial. stage of the project. It would include official action on the comprehensive guide plan amendment, and rezoning. Approval of the overall development plan requires a four - fifths vote of the City Council. 3. Final Development Plan. Each phase of this multiple phase development is subject to final site plan review and action by the planning commission and city council. The process is the same as the overall development plan, except that a three- fifths favorable vote of the City Council is required. The first phase of this project would be the hotel. The senior housing would likely be next, followed by the offices. The first phase of this development would be the hotel; the 2nd phase would be a portion of the senior housing; the 3rd phase would be more senior housing and portion of office; the 4th phase would be more senior housing; and the last phase would finish the senior housing and office towers. (See the preliminary phasing plan on pages Allb- Alle.) Primary Issues • Is the proposed preliminary development reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for six reasons: The proposed mixture of uses would be compatible within the area. The senior housing adjacent to the golf course would complement one another. Residents would benefit by the close access and views of the golf course; and the golf course benefits by having additional users to the course. The senior housing also would provide a buffer between the residential uses to the north; and the more intensive uses on the south side of 77th Street. The maximum of 4- stories on the north side of 77th Street provides a stepping up appearance to the taller buildings on the South side of 77th. With Edina's aging population, senior housing is a need for the City. 2. The project would use sustainable development principles. (See pages A6 -A7 of the applicant's narrative.) The applicant proposes to use green roofs, and would increase pervious surface from 20% to 39% at the senior housing site and from 29% to 56% at 2 ter, 1' the office site. The total green space on the two sites combined would increase from 24% to 43 %. (See page 11a.) Additionally, the applicant proposes to use energy- efficient, recycled and environmentally friendly construction materials. Between the Pentagon Quad and Tower sites, there are 209 existing over -story trees. The proposed preliminary plan shows that 415 over -story trees would be planted. 3. The proposed office space would generally replace the office space that exists today. As previously mentioned, the three office towers would total 737,000 square feet, and exisitng offices at the Pentagon Tower and Quad sites contain 660,500 square feet today. 4. The proposed project would generate traffic volumes that are within the parameters of the Alternative Urban Area -wide Review (AUAR) that has been done in this area. Additionally, the traffic would be shifted away from 77th street, closer to the access to Highway 100. Senior housing does not generate as much traffic as an office or retail uses, and the trips generated would generally be at off -peak times. A traffic study was conducted by Kimley -Horn and Associates for the Development. (See the development book.) The study concludes that the following roadway improvements are expected to be necessary into the future to accommodate the redevelopment of the Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quads sites: a. West 77th Street /TH 100 Northbound • Construction of a second westbound right -turn lane. • Construction of an exclusive eastbound and northbound right -turn lane. • Adjusting the signal phasing to provide concurrent northbound/ southbound left -turn movements. b. West 77th Street/ Minnesota Drive/ Johnson Avenue • Construction of a second southbound left -turn lane. A more detailed study would be conducted for the Overall Development Plan. The Transportation Commission would review and -make recommendations on the detailed traffic study. In addition, WSB and Associates has been hired by the City to look at "traffic triggers," to determine when specific traffic improvements would be necessary. The "trigger study" would also examine future sanitary sewer improvements that may be necessary. The Transportation Commission met on November 15th to review the traffic study. The Commission determined that the proposal is within the parameters of the AUAR study, and recommended that the developer could move forward with the Overall Development Plan subject to the conditions outlined in the minutes from the meeting. (See minutes and conditions on pages A21 -A24.) The project would encourage pedestrian movement throughout the development. The proposal encourages pedestrian movement to and from the senior housing site by providing a large sidewalk along 77th Street, and providing connections to a potential walking path around the senior housing south of the golf course. Sidewalks would also be provided throughout and around the office development. Ultimately all the buildings within this area would be connected. (See applicant's development book.) 6. The proposed uses would be permitted in the MDD -6 district, and would meet all zoning ordinance requirements. See page 9 within the supporting information of this report. The applicant is requesting an ordinance amendment to reduce the minimum acreage of an MDD -6 District from 50 acres to 20 acres. The zoning ordinance amendment would be considered during the Overall Development Plan Stage. • Is the MDD -6 Zoning District appropriate for the site? Yes. Staff believes that the MDD -6 is appropriate for the site including the existing Burgundy Place and Walsh Title site. The rezoning would ensure that housing would be built within the district. The Overall Development plan essentially becomes the zoning for an MDD -6 District. Per Section 850.14. Subd. 5.B. for every 3,650 square feet of non- residential use, one dwelling unit must be built in the MDD -6 District. Therefore, non- residential uses cannot be built without residential dwelling units. The zoning ordinance limits the square footage of non - residential uses to no more than 50 percent of the permitted gross floor area until a building permit has been issued for, and construction begun on at least 25 percent of the dwelling units. 1% T, Because the Mixed Development District requires a mixture of uses, each site is impacted by how other sites develop. As an example, if the development were approved as proposed; and five years later the property owner decided that they did not want to develop the Burgundy Place, it becomes very difficult to redevelop with something different. Burgundy Place was approved for 36 units of residential housing, therefore; it would allow for 131,400 square feet of development elsewhere within the District. The implication of removing Burgundy Place would be that 131,400 square feet of non - residential development would have to be removed in another location within the district. A property owner would always have the right to request a change to the plan; however, it would have to fit into the overall development and entire Mixed Development District. Concern has been raised by nearby residents in regard to future use. the Burgundy Place site; therefore, staff is recommending conditions that would include a prohibition on gasoline stations or drive- through windows north of 77th Street. These uses are not allowed under the current zoning of these properties, and they are not a compatible land use with residential uses to the north. Additionally, the buildings at the Burgundy site would be limited to 4 stories or 50 feet, which ever is less, and maintain a 50 -foot setback from the rear lot line. Staff Recommendation. Approve the Preliminary Development Plan for the proposed Gateway Development. Approval would authorize the applicant to apply for an Overall Development Plan. An Overall Development Plan application would include a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Zoning Ordinance Amendment. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Overall Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plan dated September 28, 2007, and revised October 24, 2007. 4 2. Sustainable design. The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative on pages A6 -A7 of the staff report. 3. Trail and sidewalk connections must be included as demonstrated on the preliminary plans. Public easements must be established over all public sidewalks. 4. Dedication of a right -of -way easement to straighten out the curve at 77th Street & Parklawn. The area of the easement is subject to approval of the City Engineer. 5. The easternmost entrance off of 77th Street into the senior housing development must be designed as a shared entrance with the golf course. 6. The four -story senior independent buildings that face 77th Street must be designed so as not to appear as the back side of buildings. 7. All traffic mitigation measures as required by the transportation commission and traffic study must be followed. 8. A short term and/or long term solution must be agreed by the City Engineer in regard to the directional flows of the sanitary sewer prior to construction of the project. This issue would be further examined as part of the "trigger study" to determine when specific traffic and sanitary sewer improvements would be necessary. The developer/ applicant would be responsible to pay their fair share of any mitigation measures that would be required as part of an approval of an overall development plan for the site. 10. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the Fire Marshal. 11. Buildings at 4930 77th Street West shall be limited to 4 stories or 50 feet, which ever is less, and must maintain a 50 foot setback from the rear lot line. 12. Convenience gasoline stations and drive- through windows shall be _prohibited on the - north side of 77th Street. 13. Compliance with the conditions outlined in the City Engineer's memo dated November 20, 2007. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission recommended approval of the Preliminary Development Plan for the proposed Gateway Development on a vote of 8 -1. (See minutes on pages A25 -A34.) SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Fred Richards golf course; zoned and guided as a park. Easterly: Office and light industrial uses; zoned and guided for industrial use. Southerly: Office and light industrial uses; zoned and guided for industrial use. Westerly: Highway 100. Existing Site Features The subject property is 43 acres in size, and contains 17 office buildings that total 660,500 square feet of office space. (See page Al.) Planning Guide Plan designation: Office Zoning: PCD -2, POD,1 and POD, 2 Planned Office District Grading/Drainage/Utilities The City Engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions outlined on the attached page A15. A more detailed review would be done as part of the Overall Development Plan review. Should an Overall Development Plan be approved by the City Council, a developer's agreement would be required for public utilities. This would include the issue of which direction the sewer would flow from the site. As mentioned in the AUAR, there is a capacity issue in this area. Currently the sewer lines from this site go to the City of Bloomington. Because the sewer line crosses a municipal boundary it becomes a Metropolitan Council sanitary sewer line. The Met Council line is at or near capacity. There are two options to remedy the problem. The Met Council can upgrade the line, as it is at capacity now, or the sewage can be directed to the west and then north, through the City of Edina and eventually into Richfield, as there is adequate capacity in the sewer lines to the north. Some development could be expected prior to addressing this issue, as buildings will need to be removed to accommodate the new buildings. The specific timing of necessary improvements would be examined as part of the Overall Development Plan. Parking The parking for a mixed development district is based on the square footage of the buildings. Non - residential uses require one space per 300 square feet. Therefore, the 940,567 square feet of non - residential uses would require 3,135 stalls. The applicant is proposing 3,285 stalls. The MDD -6 zoning district does not have a provision for senior housing. The regulation is simply for residential uses. The Code requires 1 enclosed space and .75 surface stalls per unit. Therefore, the 670 units would require 670 enclosed stalls and 502 surface stalls for a total of 1,172 stalls. The proposal includes 842 enclosed stalls, and 413 surface stalls. The plans were designed to meet the zoning ordinance; however, they likely.would not need that much parking. Senior housing does not typically require as much parking as standard marking rate multiple - family units. Senior housing developments in other zoning districts would be required to provide .25 enclosed parking spaces and .5 surface parking spaces per unit. 7 Compliance Table * Structure could be shifted to the north to avoid variance ** The applicant is requesting a Zoning Ordinance revision to reduce the minimum acreage to 20 acres. Deadline for a city decision: January 15, 2008 City Standard (MDD -6) Proposed Senior Housing - Setbacks Front Setback - 77th Street & Parklawn 46 feet (based on 58' tall building) 77 feet Rear - Golf Course 35 feet 50 feet Side - East side 35 feet 50 feet Office/Hotel Site - Setbacks Front Setback - Entire Perimeter 35 feet or increase .5 feet for each foot the 56 -69 feet building exceeds the setback requirement The 10 -story Office (west) 79 feet (based on a 123 -foot tall building) 88 feet The 10 -story Office (east) 79 feet (based on a 123 -foot tall building) 90 feet The 12 story Office 89 feet (based on a 144 -foot tall building) 100 feet The 7 story Hotel 55 feet (based on a 75 -foot tall building) 84 feet 65 feet (based on height of structure) Parking Structure Front /street 65 & 58 feet* Building Height No maximum requirement The 10 -story Office (west) -123' The 10 -story Office (east) -123' The 12 story Office -144' The 7 story Hotel - 75' Parking lot and drive aisle setback 20 feet (street) 20 feet Building Coverage 30% 30% Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) 50% - Non - residential Uses 50% 50% - Residential Uses 50% 1,881,134 square foot site 1,881,134 s.f. total proposed 940,567 s.f. - residential 940,567 s.f. - non - residential Parking Stalls - Mixed Development Non Residential: 940,567 s.f. /300 = 3,135 3,285 stalls District stalls required Residential - 670 units;1 enclosed &.75 842 enclosed & 413 surface stalls surface stalls per unit = 670 enclosed stalls proposed (1,255 total) and 502 surface required (1,172 total) Minimum Lot Size 50 acres 43 acres ** * Structure could be shifted to the north to avoid variance ** The applicant is requesting a Zoning Ordinance revision to reduce the minimum acreage to 20 acres. Deadline for a city decision: January 15, 2008 �gZr1A. A o� e' J � m �o • �. \- bAPOfN�E� RESOLUTION NO. 2007-134 APPROVING A PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PRELIMINARY REZONING FOR GATEWAY City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Wayzata Properties is requesting a Preliminary Development Plan review and rezoning for the Pentagon Park area along 77th Street. (See project location on page Al.) 1.02 The applicant is proposing to tear down the buildings on the Pentagon Tower and Pentagon Quad sites and build 634 senior housing units, an 80,000 square foot hotel, three office towers that would total 737,000 square feet, and two above ground parking structures. The Pentagon Tower and Quad sites contain 660,500 square feet of office space today. Included in the project area are Burgundy Place, Walsh Title and 7600 Parklawn office building, which would remain. The total site area is 43.18 acres. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Ultimately, this request requires the following: 1. A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment from Office to Mixed Use. 2. A Rezoning from Planned Commercial District (PCD -2) and Planned Office District (POD) to Mixed Development District 6. (MDD -6.) 3. An Overall Development Plan for the entire project. 4. A Zoning Ordinance Amendment for the MDD -6 District to reduce the minimum acreage amount from 50 acres to 20 acres. 5. Final Development Plans for each site. 2.02 In order to obtain the above approvals, the applicant must go through a three step process. That process is as follows: 1. Preliminary Development Plan. Approval of the preliminary development plan requires a three - fifths vote of the City Council, but does not guarantee approval of a comprehensive guide plan change, rezoning or overall development plan. 2. Overall Development Plan. An overall development plan is the official approval/ denial stage. It includes official action on the comprehensive guide plan amendment, and rezoning. Approval of an overall development plan requires a four - fifths vote of the City Council. 3. Final Development Plan. Each phase of this multiple phase development is subject to final site plan review and action by the planning commission and city council. Final development plans require a three- fifths favorable vote of the City Council. 2.03 The proposed mixture of uses would be compatible within the area. Citj -.Mll The project would use sustainable development principles. 952- 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 WWW.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -134 Page Two 2.05 The proposed office space would generally replace the office space that exists today. The three office towers would total 737,000 square feet, and exisitng offices at the Pentagon Tower and Quad sites contain 660,500 square feet today. 2.06 The proposed project would generate traffic volumes that are within the parameters of the Alternative Urban Area -wide Review (AUAR) that has been done in this area. A more detailed traffic study would be done as part of an overall development plan. 2.07 The project would encourage pedestrian movement throughout the development. 2.08 The proposed uses would be permitted in the MDD -6 district. 2.09 As part of the overall development plan, a study would be completed to determine specifically at what phase of the project public utilities and street improvement would be necessary. 2.10 On November 28, 2007, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Preliminary Development Plan for the proposed Gateway Development on a vote of 8 -1. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning for the proposed Gateway Development. Approval authorizes the applicant to proceed with for an Overall Development Plan. An Overall Development Plan application would include a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Final Rezoning and Zoning Ordinance Amendment. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: The Overall Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plan dated September 28, 2007, and revised October 24, 2007. 2. Sustainable design. The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative on pages A6 -A7 of the staff report. 3. Trail and sidewalk connections must be included as demonstrated on the preliminary plans. Public easements must be established over all public sidewalks. 4. Dedication of a right -of -way easement to straighten out the curve at 77th Street & Parklawn. The area of the easement is subject to approval of the City Engineer. `RESOLUTION NO. 2007-134 Page Two 5. The easternmost entrance off of 77th Street into the senior housing development must be designed as a shared entrance with the golf course. 6. The four -story senior independent buildings that face 77th Street must be designed so as not to appear as the back side of buildings. 7. All traffic mitigation measures as required by the transportation commission and traffic study must be followed. 8. A short term and /or long term solution must be agreed by the City Engineer in regard to the directional flows of the sanitary sewer prior, to construction of the project. This issue would be further examined as part of the "trigger study' to determine when specific traffic and sanitary sewer improvements would be necessary. 9. The developer/ applicant would be responsible to pay their fair share of any mitigation measures that would be required as part of an approval of an overall development plan for the site. 10. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the Fire Marshal. 11. Buildings at 4930 77th Street West shall be limited to 4 stories or 50 feet, which ever is less, and must maintain a 50 foot setback from the rear lot line. 12. Convenience gasoline stations and drive - through windows shall be prohibited on the north side of 77th Street. 13. Compliance with the conditions outlined in the City Engineer's memo dated November 20, 2007. Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on , 2007. Adopted this _ day of , 2007. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor RESOLUTION NO. 2007-134 Page Two I STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of 2007, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 20_. City Clerk , LOGISMap Output Page Page 1 of 2 iJ1� I /l http: / /gis.loRis.org/LOGIS ArcIMS/ ims? ServiceName= ed_LOGISMap_OV &ClientVersi... 10/24/2007 ci ko City of Edina IMIN ,� 'te - r � �, '► MW/r Legend a y.�-[ Highlighted t� iEi UM City Limit. so rLr ME 1:1 4 Parcels 006 Aerial MINOR -T low I rim i. MP �. iJ1� I /l http: / /gis.loRis.org/LOGIS ArcIMS/ ims? ServiceName= ed_LOGISMap_OV &ClientVersi... 10/24/2007 ci ko v , LOGISMap Output Page ICI T�- 1 F- i q rl City of Edina R in Page 1 of 2 Lbgend Stniirt Name LAbe Oly umjts r-Moks ElLake Names Lakes �!� �' El Palm Zoning ADD P- NTDD-4:11�. D...= XX INDD L;11— D..t;, . . ............ ED nD., tpm.cz C 1:3 folft—cab'dwimm CD vW-1 (;,M.ft o"M I El I0D-2j;,b**MQf(=J 0 PRD-1 -acels ZONING http://gis.logis.org/LOGIS—ArelMS/ims?ServiceName=ed—LOGISMap_OV&ClientVersi... 10/24/2007 r LML USE 9.51 GV111;W F. C1G Pfl.1G 11 4 mn1L ` J� id q.61n IFSIpP,lla'. ryt11 661,r tTIQNIL D .25 .5 1 mile _ scale — I ,r-- - ", t'f �/ "� •. 6 C><M•1Y IOi I [,1. —v C.00llxcly IYiP6:aq !9a � Irli>eS:a,[ au t� Ll•Cy OI LSwnd Land. Use Plan A3 MEMORANDUM miller d u nwi d d i e 123 North Thins Street Suite 106 Minneapolis MN 55401 -1657 www.miUerdunwiddie.com p 612- 337 -MM t 612- 337 -0031 ARCHITECTURE Date: September 28, 2007 — Revised October 16, 2007 Project: Edina Gateway — Pentagon Park Redevelopment: Preliminary Development Plan RE: Project Narrative The Edina Gateway redevelopment consists of over 43 acres of property along West 77th Street, including all of the area known as Pentagon Park. Constructed in the 1950's as a prime office address within the City of Edina, Pentagon Park has aged, become underutilized, and lost its position in the office market. It is, however, a prime location with potential to be re- developed. The Edina Gateway redevelopment will once again position this area of the City as a leader in the Twin Cities mixed use office / residential market. Process This submittal is part of a three part application to the City of Edina for: • Zoning Ordinance Amendment • Comprehensive Plan Amendment • Preliminary Development Plan • Re- zoning Upon approval of the above, an Overall Development Plan application will be submitted, along with the Final Development Plan for the initial phase of the project. It is anticipated that subsequent phases will be submitted over the next 7 to 10 years. Zoning Ordinance Amendment Request An amendment to Section 850.14 — Mixed Development District (MDD) in the form of a reduction of the Minimum Tract Area required for the MDD -6 subdistrict. A minimum tract area of 20 acres is proposed. At present, Edina is fully built and large tracts qualifying for this subdistrict are increasingly rare or absent. This reduction would allow continued application and viability of this subdistrict as a redevelopment tool in the City of Edina. Zoning Request MDD-6 is proposed for all areas of the project. Currently, the parcels are zoned POD -1, POD -2, and PCD -2. The MDD -6 zoning district encourages a mix of uses within the City, and permits larger areas of property to be developed with additional height following strict setback standards. The proposed redevelopment will not require any variances. Comprehensive Plan A change to the comprehensive plan is included in this request. The proposed change from Office /Industrial to Mixed -Use is following the direction and character outlined in the draft Edina Comprehensive Plan Update 2008 document. The Edina Gateway development team will continue to be involved in the ongoing refinement and public process for the Comprehensive Plan update. Al- Edina Gateway Project Vision September 28, 2007 Page 2 Goal Edina Gateway will become a premier mixed -use community in the Twin Cities, providing intergenerational residential living, state -of- the -art Class A commercial space and innovative business traveler accommodations while revitalizing an aging Edina community, enhancing connections and promoting environmental stewardship. History and Market Demand When Pentagon Park was developed in the early 1960's, it was among the Twin Cities' first and most prominent suburban office parks. Built out to 680,000 square feet, Pentagon Park led the dynamic growth of the suburban office market to Southeast Edina and West Bloomington during the 1960's and 70's to the point of its being referred to as the Twin Cities' "third downtown ". Local, regional and national businesses sought to locate in this highly desirable facility with great access to major highways, the airport and the growing, affluent residential communities to the Southwest of Minneapolis and St. Paul. The development of retail, office and industrial properties surrounding Pentagon Park in the decades that followed helped forge Edina's national reputation as a well - planned and well -governed community with a balanced tax base, outstanding educational, park and recreation programs, and a solid growth environment for both residential and commercial real estate values. Over the past twenty-five years, its age and physical obsolescence have moved Pentagon Park to Class C in the local office market from a rental rate and economic perspective, but its location remains a very strong and competitive Class A. The redevelopment of its office space as part of a mixed use community which addresses current physical, technological, and environmental standards required by Class A office tenants, will bring the buildings and the image of this Gateway area back to a level which matches its unquestioned Class A location. An Underserved Population The most salient fact of the demographic information being used in the analysis of Edina's Comprehensive Plan update is that the City's senior citizens (65 and over) represent approximately 20% of its current population, and that the next 25 years will see a 68% growth in that age category from the current level. Other studies have demonstrated a strong desire and tendency of Edina's seniors to remain in the community when they have raised their families and reached retirement age: The popularity of townhome and condominium properties among seniors in all price categories is testimony to the strength of those inclinations, as is the demand for those senior housing properties that have been developed to date. The need and demand for more senior living facilities in Edina is obvious, as the generation which helped create the success of the community's institutions, services and neighborhoods wishes to live out its years in the environment it has fostered and with which it is familiar. The most significant void in senior residential living facilities is one which incorporates the "continuum of care" concept in a single location. This concept can accommodate housing facilities of various styles (townhome, condominium, assisted living, specialized care facilities) that provide for the needs of the "active adult" lifestyle of persons in their 60's and 70's with independent residential facilities, dining, recreational and service amenities appropriate to that age group, along with the transitional housing accommodations that address assisted living needs, memory. care and other specialized health issues of the older adult population. The 27 acre parcel on the north side of 77th Street, south of the Fred Richards golf course, is a truly unique opportunity within Edina and other first or second tier suburbs to accommodate such an integrated senior housing and care facility. Other locations in the community for senior housing and health care are limited by their size to providing a single aspect of housing or care for their residents. The "Pentagon Quads" site presents an opportunity to create an outstanding integrated housing and care facility for the community which takes advantage of the recreational opportunities of the golf course and potentially enhanced park amenities, nearby medical clinic facilities, restaurant and service retail uses that are a part of the overall mixed use environment. U:\KAMKAM0612\Present\SD\07-09-28—PC—Prelim Plan Rezone SubmittaMarrative \Submittal narrative 071016.doc Edina Gateway September 28, 2007 Page 3 Livable Communities Edina Gateway seeks to redevelop Pentagon Park in a way that improves the quality of life within the surrounding community. The project team will continue to apply the American Institute of Architects — Livable Communities Principles to the redevelopment process. 1. Design on a Human Scale Compact, pedestrian- friendly communities allow residents to walk to shops, services, cultural resources, and jobs and can reduce traffic congestion and benefit people's health. 2. Provide Choices People want variety in housing, shopping, recreation, transportation, and employment. Variety creates lively neighborhoods and accommodates residents in different stages of their lives. 3. Encourage Mixed -Use Development Integrating different land uses and varied building types creates vibrant, pedestrian - friendly and diverse communities. 4. Preserve Urban Centers Restoring, revitalizing, and infilling urban centers takes advantage of existing streets, services and buildings and avoids the need for new infrastructure. This helps to curb sprawl and promote stability for city neighborhoods. 5. Vary Transportation Options Giving people the option of walking, biking and using public transit, in addition to driving, reduces traffic congestion, protects the environment and encourages physical activity. 6. Build Vibrant Public Spaces Citizens need welcoming, well- defined public places to stimulate face -to -face interaction, collectively celebrate and mourn, encourage civic participation, admire public art, and gather for public events. 7. Create a Neighborhood Identity A "sense of place" gives neighborhoods a unique character, enhances the walking environment, and creates pride in the community. * Protect Environmental Resources A well- designed balance of nature and development preserves natural systems, protects waterways from pollution, reduces air pollution, and protects property values. 9. Conserve Landscapes Open space, farms, and wildlife habitat are essential for environmental, recreational, and cultural reasons. 10. Design Matters Design excellence is the foundation of successful and healthy communities. Sustainability A goal of the Edina Gateway is to preserve and enhance our natural environment through sustainable (green) building design and construction. It is the intent of the Developer, through all of its projects to achieve a high level of environmental performance, durability, and healthy indoor air quality through integrated design, best practices and emerging technologies. Successful sustainable (green) design U:\KAM\KAM0612\Present\SD\07-09-28—PC—Preiim Plan Rezone SubmittaNnarrative \Submittal narrative 071016.doc Edina Gateway September 2B, 2007 Page 4 integrates a variety of practices and features that have multiple benefits. Design and construction at Edina Gateway will strive to incorporate the following sustainable (green) initiatives: Materials and Use: Use materials that minimize environmental impact; are made of engineered, reclaimed, recycled - content; have minimal packaging waste; and are low toxic, durable, and easily recycled after use. Design for adaptability and minimize material use. Encourage waste reduction and recycling with a jobsite waste management plan and convenient recycling stations. Energy - Efficiency. Energy efficiency methods should be considered in all aspects of facility design, including HVAC and lighting needs. Maximize solar access. Harvest natural energy sources such as daylight and geothermal heat. Make use of natural ventilation. Consider alternative energy sources such as fuel cells, photovoltaics, wind, and geothermal pumps. Encourage reduced electricity consumption and energy equipment through efficient thermal envelopes, efficient space and water heating, lighting, and appliances. Water Efficiency and Use: Consider innovative water technologies. Minimize use of potable water. Consider water efficient technologies and cascading water use systems. Utilize rainwater harvesting for irrigation. Indoor Air Quality. Aim to reduce pollutant sources in both interior and exterior environments by the design of mechanical systems and choice of interior materials. Minimize chemical usage during all project phases. Avoid ozone depleting chemicals in mechanical equipment and insulation. Protect the health of worker occupants and construction staff. Include systems for air cleaning, humidity control, and thermal comfort. Outdoor Environment. Minimize environmental disturbances during construction. Site buildings for efficient building footprint and orientation. Reduce the amount of excavation. Maintain site water flows to minimize erosion and on -site erosion control. Utilize innovative storm -water management techniques, such as bio- swales, rain gardens, and green roofs. Encourage infiltration. Implement low impact/low maintenance landscaping. Utilize rainwater harvesting for irrigation. Increase pervious surface area. Transportation: Promote use of energy efficient/alternative fuel vehicles. Provide convenient and safe access to public transportation and bike routes. Include on -site bicycle facilities, such as secure parking. Ensure convenient and safe pedestrian connectivity with surrounding neighborhood. Implementation Height & Massing The proposed redevelopment of the Pentagon towers and Pentagon Quads site will follow the height and massing regulations of the MDD -6 zoning, with no variances. Setback from the property lines will be minimum 35 feet, per MDD-6 requirements. The housing redevelopment on the Pentagon Quads site proposes lower scale town homes along the Fred Richards Golf, with 4 story independent and assisted living buildings along West 77th Street. This height proposed is consistent with both the new MDD -6 zoning, as well as the height allowed by the previous POD zoning. Building location and massing enables vistas into the golf course from all areas of the development, providing a neighborhood living community setting. The mixed -use office redevelopment on the Pentagon Towers site will follow the strict setback and height regulations of the MDD -6 zoning code. The code permits building height to increase at a rate of 2 feet for . A U:\KAM\KAM0612\Present\SD\07-09-28—PC—Prelim Plan Rezone SubmittaMarrative \Submittal narrative 071016.doc Edina Gateway September 26, 2007 Page 5 every 1 foot of additional setback from the property line over 35 feet. The Edina code has no maximum height limit, as it is a form -based standard, dictated by the distance (setback) from the property line. The development proposes a 7 story hotel, and 3 office buildings stepping back in height from 4 to 12 stories. Each structure fits well within the height guidelines. The sculpting of the building form will respond to the desire to provide views and natural light into and out from the site. Phasing & Sequencing The redevelopment on at both Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quads will be implemented in phases over a period of 7 to 10 years. Subject to the demands and opportunities of the marketplace, it is expected that the Towers site would have 3 phases, constructed from west to east, the first new structure being a hotel with high visibility from Highways 100 and 494. The center and eastern office and parking structures would follow in 2 phases, organized on the site development plan to permit flexibility to respond to market and aesthetic demands. The Pentagon Quads site development plan provides the ability to be implemented in 3 phases. The initial phase would include both town house and independent living residences located at the western portion of the site. Subsequent phases would be redeveloped from west to east. Access The primary access to the Pentagon Towers and Pentagon Quads Sites presently comes from T.H. 100 onto West 77th Street, and from T.H. 494 and France Avenue onto West 76th Street and Parklawn Ave and then onto West 77th Street. From West 77th, the Sites are accessed via direct curb cuts or via intersections at Normandale Road and Computer Ave. Additional access to the Towers Site is from Viking Drive. For the Preliminary Development Plan the Towers Site has four (4) primary access points — one each at West 77th (the Burgundy Place signal), Computer Ave., Normandale Road and Viking Drive. Secondary service access is located at two (2) locations, one along Normandale Road (right -in, right -out only) and one along Viking Drive. For the Preliminary Development Plan the Quads Site has three (3) primary access points — two (2� along West 77th St. and one off of Parklawn. Secondary service access to the Site is also off of West 77 St at three (3) locations (right -in, right -out only). Additional information regarding turning movements at access locations can be found in the traffic report on illustrations T -2 and T -3. TrafficlTransportation A preliminary analysis of traffic impacts has been completed based on the land use and site plan information contained in the Pentagon Park Preliminary Development Plan. The traffic analysis is intended to identify the key traffic issues associated with this development and serve as a basis for discussion and the development of a detailed site plan as the project moves forward. The additional traffic generated by the land uses identified in the Pentagon Park Preliminary Development Plan was estimated and analyzed to determine the improvements necessary to maintain acceptable traffic operations during the AM and PM peak hours. Each of the mitigation measures identified in the Gateway Study Area AUAR were also assessed to determine their applicability to the 2014 Build scenario of this project given its specific land uses and densities. The traffic operations analysis was completed consistent with the AUAR in terms of existing trip generation, trip distribution and background traffic growth, using the AUAR traffic models as the foundation of the Pentagon Park traffic analysis. Based on the preliminary findings of the traffic operations analysis, the following roadway improvements are expected to be necessary to accommodate the Pentagon Park Development Plan: • W 77th Street / TH 100 NB • Construct second westbound right -turn lane • Construct exclusive eastbound and northbound right -turn lanes U:\KAM\KAM0612\Present\SD\07-09-28—PC—Prelim Plan Rezone SubmittaMarrative \Submittal narrative 071016.doc Edina Gateway September 28, 2007 Page 6 o Adjust signal phasing to provide concurrent northbound /southbound left -turn movements o W 77th Street / Minnesota Drive / Johnson Ave o Construct second southbound left -turn lane The AUAR identified the need for dual northbound left -turn lanes at the W 77th Street/Computer Avenue intersection given the build -out of the full Gateway Study Area. However, the dual left -turn lanes, from a purely capacity perspective, would not be necessary under the current Pentagon Park Development Plan given that the projected peak hour northbound left -turn volume would be approximately 275, vehicles and the projected volume on the entire approach would only be about 400 total vehicles. _ In general, the signal timing plans for the W 77th Street and France Avenue corridors would need to be optimized as traffic volumes in the area grow. By the year 2014, the capacity on France Avenue would be expected to be insufficient and improvements would be expected to be necessary even in the 2014 No- Build conditions. A complete Travel Demand Management Plan is also being prepared for the Pentagon Park project, the focus of which is identifying measures to encourage residents, employees, and visitors to use alternative modes of transportation and to travel outside the peak hours when possible. Some of the strategies that may be incorporated into the Travel Demand Management Plan include: Provide improved ADA- compliant transit shelters on or adjacent to the development sites for the existing Metro Transit bus routes (6, 540, and 578) that currently run along W 77th Street and Parklawn Avenue and provide direct service to downtown Minneapolis, the University of Minnesota, Edina, Richfield, and Bloomington. ® Provide secure bike racks or bike lockers for employees, residents, and visitors at key entrance locations. • Support and promote car and vanpooling by employees. • Provide information on transportation alternatives including bus route maps and schedules, flex - car programs, flexible work schedules, staggered work hours, and telecommuting. Parking Projected parking demand for Pentagon Park Preliminary Development Plan was calculated using City of Edina Zoning Code. For retail and office uses, MDD -6 standards have been applied. For Townhomes, Residential District R3 was used. For multi -unit senior residences, Planned Senior Residential was used. Wetland Delineation Based on the National Wetland Inventory Map and the Gateway Study Area AUAR, a wetland may be located along the northern boundary of the Pentagon Quads Site adjacent to the Fred Richards Golf Course. According to the same information, the Towers Site does not appear to contain any wetlands within its boundary since the majority of the site is paved or structures. No Final Development Plans will be submitted for the Quads Site during the 2007 — 2008 Winter season. Therefore, delineation is unnecessary for the Preliminary Development Plan this year. Domestic Water Water service to the Pentagon Park Development is currently provided by the City of Bloomington's water system. Service could also be provided by the City of Edina. As identified in the Gateway Study Area iKI U:\KAM\KAM0612\Present\SD\07-09-28—PC—Prelim Plan Rezone SubmittaMarrative \Submittal narrative 071016.doc Edina Gateway September 28, 2007 Page 7 AUAR, sufficient capacity exists within both cities water system to handle development on the scale of that proposed in the Pentagon Park Preliminary Development Plan. As each phase of the Masterplan is developed and existing buildings are demolished, water service will be removed. As new buildings are constructed, watermain will be looped with the existing public system to provide redundancy and fire protection. Sanitary Sewer Sanitary Sewer service for the Towers Site and Quads Site is currently located to the west and to the south. The Preliminary Development Plan is expected to add a peak flow of 820,000 gallons per day. This amount of additional sewerage will exceed the capacity of the existing system south of Computer Avenue. Further downstream, a Metropolitan Council lift station is currently at 98% capacity. When buildings are demolished, capacity will return to the system, but additional capacity will be needed as final build out occurs. The development proposed in the Preliminary Plan will push the lift station beyond its current design capacity. Temporary on -site sewage tanks may need to be considered to reduce peak rates and lower the overall stress on the public system. Storm Water Management As identified in the Gateway Study Area AUAR, the Pentagon Park neighborhood has experienced frequent flooding. during large rain events and some storm sewers surcharge in the 10 year event. Storm water management strategies for the Pentagon Park Preliminary Development Plan include bioretention, filtration, rainwater capture, green or eco- roofs, permeable pavements, and other Low Impact Development storm water Best Management Practices. The Towers site plans to utilize green roofs on portions of the proposed buildings and parking structures. These vegetated surfaces would be used to both detain water on site, reducing peak runoff rates and improve overall water quality through filtration. It is anticipated that a combination of extensive and intensive green -roofs would be used. Low impact strategies at grade would include using on -site infiltration, pervious pavements, and underground storage for irrigation water and other non - potable water needs. The Quads Site is anticipated to use many of the same low impact development strategies as found on the Towers Site. However, with lower densities than the Towers, greater areas of at -grade infiltration would be proposed. Underground storage and pervious pavements will also be utilized to reduce overall storm water volume and peak discharge rates. Nine Mile Creek Watershed District is expected to issue updated rules early in 2008. The Development Team is aware of the proposed rule changes and plans to meet or exceed all regulations. Pentagon Park/Gateway Landscape Design Concept The landscape design for the Towers Site will reflect and support the building architecture by reinforcing circulation patterns, defining spaces and using complementary materials. The transitional spaces between the buildings and streets will focus on the pedestrian creating an environment that encourages walking. Sidewalks and plazas connect outdoor space within the site and to adjacent properties. These connections will be lined with trees and other landscape elements to create human scale. The landscape design for the Quads Site will reflect traditional residential design, using familiar patterns that include sidewalks, streets and yards commonly found in an established Edina. neighborhood. Boulevard trees, turf grass, shrubs and perennials will help define the internal street environment and visually connect adjoining yard spaces with common landscape elements, green spaces and gardens. Landscape design on the Quads site will take advantage of the proximity of the site to the Fred Richards golf course by creating vistas focused on the pastoral setting of the course's trees and water features. A40 U:\KAM\KAM0612\Pr6sent\SD\07-09-28—PC—Prelim Plan Rezone SubmittaMarrative \Submittal narrative 071016.doc Edina Gateway September 28, 2007 Page 8 Neighbors to the north and golf course users will look south into the site viewing pergolas, gardens and other neighborhood scale site improvements. Connections and multiple pedestrian access opportunities are a key concept within the Pentagon Park Preliminary Development Plan. Numerous sidewalks and pathways connect spaces within the development; reducing automobile trips, encouraging wellness and exercise and building on and supplementing established and future community patterns. Through the use of native vegetation and plant materials that do not require excessive water or fertilizers, the landscape design for both sites will focus on sustainability and provide educational opportunities for the public on best management practices for stormwater. The Pentagon Park Preliminary Development Plan works to minimize excessive expanses of manicured turf and to develop bioretention garden spaces that will evolve seasonally and add additional interest to the neighborhood. Stormwater capture practices will provide supplemental irrigation water for landscape elements. Green roofs will be integrated into the overall environment, blurring the lines between building and landscape. Preliminary Plant and Materials Schedule PLANT AND MATERIALS SCHEDULE PLANT TYPE SPECIES OPTIONS SIZE ROoT SPACING REMARKS OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREE MAPLE OAK HONEYL=ST. HACKBEIM. LINDEN z- ur -e'CAL BMB PER PLAN SINGLE STEL SPECIMEN EVERGREEN TREE, BLALK HUB SPRUCE. SCOTCH PINE RE) PINE WHITE PIKE . B- T7 BSB PER PLAN FULLAND NATUBiAL FDRK PECIME N MULTLSTEJ ORNAMENTAL TREE RIVER BWCHL TREE LILAC, AMUR MAPLE SERVICEBEARY, DOGWOOD S. HT. BAB PER PLAN SINGLE AND MULTYSTEA SPECIMEN ORNMffNTALTREE HAWTHORN. CRABAPPLE DDOWOOD TCAL -BHT. CONT. PER PLAN SPECIMEN DECIDUOUS SHRUBS DOGWOOD. VMURNUK EUDNYMUS.SPDLA SHRUB ROMS, LONICEUL XYDT ANC�A W -CS CONT. S -PO.C. LOCATED TO ACCENT OUTDOOR SPACES, BUILDING FOUNDAT1ONSAND ENTRIES DECDUOUSSHRUB HEDGE DDTRNESIER ALPINE CURRE T W CONT. 7 -7 D.C. LOCATED FOR HEDGES AND SCREENING CONIFEROUS YEW, SEA GREEN JUNIPER, JUNIPER VARSITIES 93 DONT. T- 1'D.C. LOCATED TO ACCENT OUTDOOR SPACES BUILDING FOLINDATIONB AND TINRRES PERENNIALPIANTS MULTIPE VARIETIES NB TO SID ' 6'1 CONT. VARIES FOR PLANTINGBEDSATFOUCATIOKACCEIT .AND WFLTRATIWN AREAS MNNOT SEED MmTURE 325 NATIVE EDGE PRAIRIE MEADOW MIX IWETUAND RESTORATION) S® FOR EDGES NEAR THE WETWID(S)IN QUADS LUTE SOD BLUEGRASS -LAWN I NO-MOW WRTF (FESCUES) BLUEGRASS LAWN IN MANICURED ARE0.4RTF FESCUES W AREAS OF LOWER MNNIEJANCE EDGER COMMERCIAL GRADE STEEL AND VINYL EDGM SURRDUNDS PLANTING BEDS ADJACENT TO SM AREAS MULCH SHREDDED HARDWOOD NWMIM C DEPTH FOR RANTING MOS AND RINGING TREEBASE All U:\ KAM\ KAM0612 \Present\SD \07_09_28_PC_Prelim Plan Rezone SubmittaMarrative \Submittal narrative 071016.doc 2008 EDINA GATEWAY PRELIMINARY PHASING SCHEDULE DEMOLITION BY PHASE BUILDING NUMBER BUILDING REMOVED FLRS SF REMOVED TOTAL SF NON -RES TOTAL UNITS 2 4960 Viking Dr. 1 11 648 1 0 5 7701 Normandale Rd. 1 10 342 ____21L990 0 Phase 2 2009-20101 1 11 1 4570 77th St. W. 1 3 1 51,911 1 1 0 12 1 4550 77th St. W. 1 3 1 49,421 1 1 0 13 1 4530 77th St. W. 1 3 1 50,138 1 151,469 0 Phase 3 2011 -2013 1 4940 771 h St. W. 6 68,628 .0 1 14 4900 Vi kin Dr. 1 18 404 1 0 kj 4901 77th St. W. 1 19 273 1 91,180 0 4620 77th St. W. 3 49,800 1 103 0 10 4600 77th St. W. 3 1 50,430 1 206 535 0 Phase 4 7 1 4660 77th St. W. 3 1 52,357 0 2014 -2015 8 4640 771h St. W. 3 50 997 1 103 354 0 Phase 5 2017 6 4815 77th St. W. 1 14.58 1 0 1 14 1 4510 771h St. W. 1 3 1 50,979 1 0 16 1 7710 Com uler Ave. 1 1 1 25,620 1 91,180 0 DEMO TOTAL 1 574,5281 =0 Buildings Existing to Remain 15 7600 Parklawn 4 85 632 0 17 Bur d Pier 4 16 56D 36 18 Walsh Title 1 21,000 123192 0 SF EXISTING ALL SITES 697,720 36 CONSTRUCTION BY PHASE BUILDING NUMBER BUILDING ADDED I FLRS /UNITS 2008. NET CHANGE =NEW -DEMO TOTAL GSF I Per Phase I Per Phase Cumulativel Cumulative NON -RES GSF NEW UNITS GSF INEW UNIT: Phase 2 1 G1 Townhome 1 1 21 1 01 1 2009 -2010 H1 Independent Living 1 1 122 01 1 J1 I Assisted Living 1 1 103 01 umum 168,8201 246 242 847 246 r—P—ha—se-5-1 E I E 011ice 10 1 260 000 2017 F East Parking Structure 5 1 0 J2 Assisted Living 2 103 1 01 260,0001 168,8201 1031_ 242 847 634 NEW GSF TOTALI 817,375 Buildings Ex stIng to Remain 15 7600 Parklawn 4 85,632 17 Burgundy Place 4 16,560 18 1 Walsh Title 1 1 210001 123,192 FULL BUILD TOTAL GSF ALL SITES 940567 FOR BUILDING NUMBER - REFERENCE PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN -SHEET S-10 (EXISTING) AND SHEET S-2r (PROPOSED) DOCUMENT IS FOR PRELIMINARY PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY- SUBJECT TO CHANGE 03 DECEMBER 2007 MILLER DUNWIDDIE ARCHITECTS KAM0612 L� PFD . PROPOSED BUILDING .,-,'--\'~, T\ I 2007 L % %a o T- \� j -a T a� I ✓� i. it ` `r c J i 't°• it — I 'ENTAGON^IMk' 1S1TE '" v+ n rj �- —� It 1 !� _ 9 o p riG 71 ooni�cF; Alin fin (Inn :[.GF•R'n IINITS- - —. .,.., .., ..... ..,....-- -• - - -- • - — CUMULATIVE CHANGE: +58,010 GSF NON - RESIDENTIAL DOCUMENT IS FOR PRELIMINARY PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY - SUBJECT TO CHANGE 12 -03 -2007 filler dunwiddie '_ Kimley -Hom -: °0- and Associates. Inc. EDINA GATEWAY 123 NorthThWSb-WSullo106 Pentagon Park Redevelopment MinnospoUsMN 5%01 -1657 - _ - wayR s. LAC. PHASING PLAN 1 OF 3 wwwan0lerdumA4&fl, corn p 612337-0000 f 612337 -0001 Edina, Minnesota EXISTING- BUILDING - PRO P.OSED BUILDING, -� - y ELMMI l -L L 1' dR0 CG f A_nM 1 l;CG KIrw_RGCInF:KITIA'I 7dRa IPIITC ;=07LVU� -LV 1 V IVC I l�fll11Vl7C. - IJ 1,'4V� V�r IV VIV-RCJIUCIV I IP1L , TL•-FV VIVI I J _,;. .,. AL CUMULATIVE CHANGE: - 93,459 GSF NON - RESIDENTIAL, +246 UNITS �� N I ��•I I - �)' Now— 11 WAR ED 535 SF: ADD: 477 375 GSF NON - RESIDENTIAL: 143 UNITS 011 -2013 NET CHANGE: +270,840 GSF NON - RESIDENTIAL, +143 UNITS CUMULATIVE CHANGE: +177,381 GSF NON - RESIDENTIAL, ±389 UNITS DOCUMENT IS FOR PRELIMINARY PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY - SUBJECT TO CHANGE miller dunwiddie / =n Kimley -Hom and Associates. Inc. EDINA GATEWAY 123NwthThWsldsua.10s wr Pentagon Park Redevelopment WinrmpoMMN S„ -169 VVayzac3 Properties. «C• PHASING PLAN 2 OF 3 P 612-M14X00 (612- 337 -OG31 A I I � Edina, Minnesota 12 -03 -2007 CUMULATIVE CHANGE: +74,027 NON - RESIDENTIAL GSF, +531 UNITS o izs :'�n SCIALE R 7. \ NV ' CUMULATIVE CHANGE: +242,847 GSF NON - RESIDENTIAL, +634 UNITS DOCUMENT IS FOR PRELIMINARY PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY - SUBJECT TO CHANGE 12 -03 -2007 )iller dunwiddie P'_ ICimley -Hom :.RCHITECTUFE and Associates. Inc. EDINA GATEWAY 123NoMThtrd51roa1 Sub* 106 Pentagon Park Redevelopment minmapoamN 56601 -1657 Wayzata Properties. t.t_c. PHASING PLAN 3 OF 3 wwwmMwdunwWc09,=n . p 612-374000 f 612337-0001 I I Edina, Minnesota MEMORANDUM miller d u nwi d d i e 123 North Third Street Suite 1D4 Minneapolis MN 55601 -1657 www.millerdunwiddie_Com p 612 - 337 -MM f 612 - 337 -OM1 ARCHITECTURE Date: September 28, 2007 — Revised October 24, 2007 Project: Edina Gateway — Pentagon Park Redevelopment: Preliminary Development Plan RE: Project Narrative Addendum — Units and Parking The following calculations represent an application of Edina Code Section 850.08 Parking and Circulation and Section 850.14 MDD District to the Preliminary Development Plan submitted on September 28, 2007 by Eberhardt Advisory. These calculations supersede parking and unit counts identified in the narrative and Preliminary Plan Document. A. MDD -6 Residential and Non- Residential Area Maximums Calculation 1. Total Site Area = 1,881,134 gsf 2. FAR Allowed 1.0 = 1,881,134 gsf FAR Non - Residential Max Allowed = .5 = 940,567 gsf 3. Residential Lot Area Required = 3,300 gsf / unit without allowances {however Section 850.08 W requires all MDD residential units to have 1 enclosed stall) Therefore allowance (a) is automatic ( -500 gst) Therefore Lot Area Required = 2,800 gsf /unit for all units 4. Residential Unit Calculation with allowance (a): 1,881,134 / 2,800 sf = 671 units maximum 5. Calculate Allowable Non - residential Floor Area for MDD -6 = 1,750 gsf / residential unit per Section 850.14 Subd 5, B, 2 1,750 sf x 671 units = 1,174,250 sf 1,174,250 gsf (Non - Residential Area based on unit calculation) MDD -6 940,567 gsf (FAR .5 Non - Residential Allowed) Therefore 940,657 gsf used for Non - Residential Area B. MDD -6 Non - Residential Area by Units Proposed 1. 670 Units x 1750 gsf = 1,172,500 gsf 1,172,500 gsf > 940,567 gsf (.5 FAR) Therefore 940,567 gsf is maximum allowed Non - Residential Area for Preliminary Plan Al - Edina Gateway September 28, 2007 Page 2 C MDD -6 Residential Unit Calculation by Parking Required (Section 850.08, W) Given — all units require enclosed stalls 1. Proposed Residential Units. = 670 Senior Site = 634 Burgundy Place = 36 (Burgundy Place self parks with 49 stalls enclosed and 89 exterior stalls) Senior Housing Parking Calculation 2. Enclosed Stalls Required 3. Enclosed Stalls Provided Townhomes Ind. Living Assisted Living Total 4. Exterior Stalls Required 5. Exterior Stalls Provided On Street Assisted Living 7600 Parklawn surplus" Total 6. Enclosed Stalls Surplus = 634 stalls per (Section 850.08, W) = 124 = 369 = 300 = 793 (159 stall surplus) = 476 stalls = (634 units x.75 stalls ext/unit req.) = 104 = 105 = 115 = 324 (152 stalls deficient) = 159 (surplus from #3 above) Total Senior Units Parking Required = 634units x 1.75 stalls required = 1,110 stalls required Total Senior Units Parking Provided = 1,117 stalls provided (793 + 324) 7 stalls surplus D MDD -6 Non - Residential Area Calculation (Section 850.14) 1. Allowed Non - Residential Area 2. Existing or Approved Buildings Burgundy Place Walsh Title 7600 Parklawn 3. Proposed Buildings Hotel NW Building E Building SW Building 4. Total Non -Res. Existing / Proposed = 940,567 GSF (.5 FAR) = 123,192 GSF = 16,560 GSF = 21,000 GSF = 85,632 GSF = 817,375 GSF = 80,000 GSF = 230,000 GSF = 260,000 GSF = 247,375 GSF = 940,567 GSF k(3 U:\KAKAKAM0612\Present\SD\07-09-28—PC—Prelim Plan Rezone SubmittaNnarrative \Submittal narrative Addendumi 071024.doc Edina Gateway September 28, 2007 Page 3 E. MDD -6 Non - Residential Parking Calculation _(Section 850.08, VIA 1. Stalls.Required a. Burgundy Place b. Walsh Title c. 7600 Parklawn d. Hotel e. NW Building f. E Building g. SW Building Total 2. Stalls Provided a. Burgundy Place b. Walsh Title - c. 7600 Parklawn d. Hotel e. NW Building f. E Building g. SW Building Total = 16,560 / 300 = 21,000 / 300 = 85,632 / 300 = 80,000 / 300 = 230, 000 / 300 = 260,000 / 300 = 247,375 / 300 = 940,567 / 300 = 55 stalls = 70 stalls = 285 stalls = 267 stalls = 767 stalls = 867 stalls = 825 stalls = 3136 stalls = 75 stalls (20 surplus) = 77 stalls (7 surplus) = 400 stalls (115 surplus)* = 267 stalls = 767 stalls = 867 stalls = 832 stalls = 3285 stalls provided (149 surplus) *Surface parking at 7600 Parklawn is shared with Senior Housing End U: \KAM\KAM0612 \Present \SD \07_09_28_PC_Prelim Plan Rezone SubmittaNnarrative \Submittal narrative Addendum 071024.doc e o MEMORANDUM — Plan Review �y ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA DATE: November 20, 2007 TO: Cary Teague - Planning Directory FROM: Wayne Houle — City Engineer C: Jack Sullivan — Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Gateway Redevelopment West 77th Street Engineering has reviewed the preliminary plans for the above stated project and offer the following comments: Attached you will find the Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) draft minutes that reviewed this project from a transportation perspective. The ETC made recommendations based on Jack Sullivan's memo dated November 15, 2007, see attached. The conditions are stated below: • The Traffic Study needs to follow the requirements set forth in the ETC Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) guidelines adopted by the Transportation Commission. • All comments outlined in the WSB review memo dated October 31, 2007 should be addressed in the TIA. • All assumptions in the TIA need to be clearly identified, including but not limited to, development densities, phasing plans, background traffic growth, etc. • Relocation of the Fred Richards Golf Course entrance. • Acknowledgement and incorporation of a future roadway realignment and right of way dedication at the intersection of Parklawn and W. 774h. • All service entrances along W. 77th and other city roads be right -in /right out only. • Any other reasonable conditions as the project becomes further refined and defined in the Overall and Final Development Plans. • Staff recommends that the north entrance to the hotel be restricted to a right -in / right -out entrance. • Staff also recommends that the water system be designed to be connected to the City of Edina water system. • Staff is also working with our City Consultant to prepare "trigger points" for development as it pertains to infrastructure improvements including the transportation system. This information is more appropriate at the next development step. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this first review. Thanks GAEngineering \Genera1\70 - 79 Streets \77th Street West - AUAR \Preliminary Plans\20071120 WH Gateway memo to CT.doc 4l- Page 1 of 2 Edina Transportation Commission Item III. b. REGULAR TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING �°, a ro REPORT /RECOMMENDATION N� � ,y To: Transportation Commissioners From: Jack Sullivan, PE Assistant City Engineer Date: November 15, 2007 Subject: Revised Edina Gateway Traffic Study Agenda Item No.: III.b ACTION: ® Recommendation /Motion ® Discussion ❑ Information The following is the revised staff report for November 15, 2007 for the Edina Gateway Pentagon Park Redevelopment. All information in italics has been modified from the original recommendation.. The development team, City staff and our consultant firm of WSB Inc. have held recent meetings to better define the project status and process. The City now considers the Transportation Report application complete. The uniqueness of zoning district MDD 6 requires a three step application process; a usual project requires only two steps. Thus this is the catalyst for the change from an incomplete to complete application. The three steps are: 1. Preliminary Development Plan 2. Overall Development Plan 3. Final Development Plan The development team is only on step 1, Preliminary Development Plan. This requires the Transportation Commission review the traffic study for concurrence with the recently approved AUAR. The Transportation Commission and staff will receive a much more detailed traffic study for review and action in steps number two and three as outlined above. In addition, the City has contracted with WSB to look at 'traffic triggers" The `Traffic triggers" will help determine when physical improvements to the roadway network will be necessary. Improvements will be required when traffic volumes approach or will exceed the capacity at the time of a development or phasing of the project. This data will help the Commission and staff with review and recommendations. 41L HA20071115_Revised_Edina Gateway_Traffic_study.doc 'Page 2 of 2 Item M. b. Edina Transportation Commission Recommendation: Review the attached traffic study submitted by Miller Dunwiddie and Kimley -Horn dated September 28, 2007 for Edina Gateway Pentagon Park Redevelopment - preliminary development plan. In addition, review the attached email correspondence dated November 14, 2007 from Jack Sullivan. If so desired by the Transportation Commission, adopt a motion recommending that the Edina Gateway Pentagon Park Redevelopment traffic study is within the parameters set forth in the AUAR study and that the transportation component of the development application can move forward to the "Overall Development Plan': The Development team will meet the following conditions at the time that they submit an application for the Overall Development Plan. Conditions of the recommendation are as follows: 1. The Traffic Study needs'to follow the requirements set forth in the ETC Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) guidelines adopted by the Transportation Commission. 2. All comments outlined in the WSB review memo dated October 31, 2007 should be addressed in the TIA. 3. All assumptions in the TIA need to be clearly identified, including but not limited to development densities, phasing plans, background traffic growth, etc. 4. Relocation of the Fred Richards Golf Course entrance. 5. Acknowledgement and incorporation of a future roadway realignment and right of way dedication at the intersection of Park/awn and W. 77th 6. All service entrances along W. 77th and other city roads be right -in /right out only. 7. Any other reasonable conditions as the project becomes further refined and defined in the Overall and Final Development Plans. Info /Background: The developer came to the City in the spring of 2007 about a possible redevelopment of the area near 77th Street from Trunk Highway 100 to Minnesota Boulevard. The consulting firm of WSB and Associates completed an Alternative Urban Area wide Review (AUAR) of the project site. One of the components of an AUAR is transportation impacts to the project site. The ETC have reviewed the AUAR and recommended that the draft AUAR document be released for public comment on June 21, 2007. Since that time the final AUAR document has been approved by all regulatory agencies as well as the Edina City Council on November 5, 2007. A( HA20071115_Revised_Edina Gateway_Traffic_study.doc WSB & Associates, Gtc. Infrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction Memorandum To: Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer Jack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer City of Edina From: Chuck Rickart,'PE, PTOE Transportation Engineer WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: October 31, 2007 Re: Edina Gateway — Paragon Park Redevelopment Traffic Impact Analysis Review City of Edina WSB Project No. 1686 -02 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite #300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541 -4800 Fax: 763 541 -1700 As requested, we have reviewed the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Kimley -Horn & Associates for the proposed Edina Gateway — Paragon Park Redevelopment. The proposed development is located along 77h Street between TH 100 and Minnesota Street. The redevelopment is proposed to include 740,000 square feet of office, 80,000 square feet of hotel, 492 independent - living units, 151 assisted - living units, and 62 townhome units. The proposed project is planned to replace the existing Paragon Park Office development. The proposed redevelopment area was included in the Alternative Urban Area Review (AUAR) for the Gateway Area. One aspect of the AUAR reviewed the traffic impacts of the entire area. Based on the review of the Paragon Park Redevelopment Traffic Impact Analysis, the following questions /comments are made: 1. In general, the Traffic Impact Analysis needs to follow the requirements outlined by the City for preparation of such documents including all maps and graphics. 2. The report indicates that existing (2007) traffic counts were used at all intersections except the intersections of Computer Avenue at Viking Drive and Viking Drive at the TH 100 frontage road. The counts at these intersections were based on a PM peak -hour count in August 2005. Typically, traffic counts more than two years old are considered outdated and should be recounted. In addition, the AM peak hour was estimated and an actual count should be completed. The traffic generation for the proposed site was prepared using the ITE Trip Generation Manual. The following trip generation issues should be addressed: A. Are the trip generation estimates consistent with the AUAR trip generation estimates? B. Was the Burgundy Place Development included as part of the trip generation estimates? If not they need to be included. AIY H:VAEMO- hw10-103107,doc Mr. Wayne Houle, PE Jack Sullivan, PE City of Edina October 31, 2007 Page 2 of 3 C. The proposed trip generation indicates that there are three buildings for the proposed office development. The site plan shows a fourth office building in the development'. In the text, there is an indication of 820,000 square feet of office and on the site plan and in the trip generation table, it indicates 740,000 square feet of development. This should be clairified. D. There was an internal retail trip reduction taken as part of both the office development and the senior - living development portions of the project. What percentage was used for both of these reductions? Explain the rationale in using a reduction for the proposed projects. E. The trip generation rates for the senior - living development should be split into the actual uses. A rate for the townhomes, independent living, and assisted living, should be developed. 4. In the Projected Traffic Volumes Section, Historic Traffic Growth, it is indicated that a 1 percent per year growth factor was used to develop the future traffic volumes. It is unclear if this was a rate used on top of the projected traffic volumes from the AUAR or if the 1 percent per year growth was the 'only background traffic that was used. Please clarify the historic traffic growth for the proposed project. 5. The text summarizes some of the results of the traffic study with respect to- levels of service (LOS). The report should include tables and/or figures showing the level of service at each intersection including any intersection approach movement that has an unsatisfactory LOS, the delays at each of these intersections and approaches, and the queue lengths at these intersections. 6. Figures should be included showing the existing traffic volumes, the traffic distribution, anticipated traffic generation at each intersection, and future traffic volumes f6r the proposed study area., 7. The City's transportation plan, as well as the AUAR, identified an east/west collector roadway that would realign the intersection of 77th Street and Minnesota Drive. The future plans for this roadway should be accommodated as part of the planned redevelopment. This future intersection should also be analyzed in its ultimate configuration. 8. The Traffic Impact Analysis indicates several roadway improvements that would be necessary to accommodate this redevelopment in the future. An analysis of how these improvements would impact the roadway system and the anticipated level of service should be provided. 9. It is unclear from the document if the site access locations were analyzed as part of the study. These intersections should be included in any future analyses. 10. The analysis of the proposed future conditions including the, entire AUAR area should be included in the study. This should include a discussion on what additional right -of -way and/or improvements may be necessary in the future and how this proposed development is planning to accommodate those future conditions. Based on these comments and my general review of the site configuration and the Traffic Impact Analysis, additional information and analysis should be provided before any approval recommendation can be made. l H. I MEM0.whoul e- 103107. doc Mr. Wayne Houle, PE Jack Sullivan, PE City of Edina October 31, 2007 Page 3 of 3 Alb H. I MEI O- mAoule- 103107.doc z�A, MINUTES OF THE �,� Edina Transportation Commission o e Cn Thursday, November 15, 2007 o Edina City Hall 4801 West 50th Street Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Les Wanninger, Steve Brown, Marie Thorpe, Jean White, Marc Usem, Geof Workinger, Paul Mooty, Warren Plante, Hilah Almog MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Wayne Houle, Jack Sullivan, Sharon Allison I. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by chair Wanninger. II. Comments a. Chairman Comments None. b. Public Comments None. Ill. Old Business a. Northeast Edina Traffic Study Implementation Chair Wanninger explained that approximately one year ago, the Council unanimously approved the ETC's recommendation of the traffic study which included measures to improve traffic flow at 50th & France, etc. and some implementation began in this area this summer. Wanninger said the presentation tonight is for the first round of residential safety improvements. Assistant City Engineer Sullivan explained that this was on the agenda previously for informational purposes only and staff is now seeking approval for implementation starting in 2008. Sullivan said staff is asking that the ETC adopt a motion that the residential area safety improvement measures for the Country Club area are consistent with recommendations of the Northeast Edina Traffic Study and the goals and objectives of the City of Edina Transportation Commission Policy. Transportation Engineer Mike Kotila with SEH, explained that the plans have been refined since their presentation in October. Since that time, they've met with the Heritage Preservation Board and held an open house for residents of the Country Club neighborhood. Some of the changes include posting signs at entry points into the neighborhood that would warn drivers of speed humps and raised crosswalks in an effort to encourage them to reduce their speed and possibly adding an advisory speed plate below. Changes made to the drawings include narrowing down at some intersections; evaluating getting rid of the diamond shapes warning signs and using a reflective sign post that would be less obtrusive, etc. M Regarding the suggestion from the Bike Edina Taskforce to add a bike lane on Wooddale, Kotila said the existing roadway is 23 ft and to accommodate driving lanes and bike lane (5 ft.), the roadway would need to be approximately 31 ft. wide and an additional 7 ft. for parking. To add a bike lane the entire length of the corridor on Wooddale, between Country Club and Sunnyside would impact parking and loss of trees. At the conclusion of the presentation, discussion focused on reason for close proximity of speed humps, police and fire response time as a result of speed humps, reduction of cut -thru traffic, setting precedent for other neighborhoods and implementing bike lanes into current plans. Kotila said the roads are too narrow for bike lanes and project manager, Paul Pasko of SEH, said the desire of the Heritage Preservation Board is less pavement. Pasko said they could not give an opinion on incorporating bike lanes into the plans. He said a discussion by the stakeholders would be necessary - Heritage Preservation Board, ETC, Bike Taskforce and residents. Sullivan said the Bike Taskforce is on the agenda later and he is planning a workshop for the ETC to discuss the Bike Plan. In the meantime, he said the task at hand is to decide whether or not the plans presented are agreeable with the Northeast Edina Traffic Study. Staff's recommendation is as follow: If so desired by the Transportation Commission, adopt a motion recommending that the residential area safety improvement measures for the Country Club area are consistent with the recommendations of the Northeast Edina Traffic Study and the goals and objectives of the City of Edina Transportation Commission Policy. A motion was made by Commissioner Usem to approve the plans as presented and recommended that the plans be reviewed by staff, ETC and the Bike Taskforce to make potential bike improvements. Seconded by Commissioner Thorpe. All voted aye. Motion carried. b. Edina Gateway — Pentagon Redevelopment Sullivan said the Edina Gateway redevelopment plans was presented at the last meeting for informational purposes only and since that time, staff has had a series of meetings with the applicant regarding the completeness of the application. He said this project is a first of its kind for the City. Because of the size of the project, it has to go through a 3 -step process: preliminary development plan (current stage), overall development plan, and final development plan and with each step there is an approval process. Sullivan explained that the preliminary development plan only requires that the ETC agree to their conceptual design, if it they believe it fits with the AUAR. The applicant is seeking approval for their conceptual layout which now includes number of residential units and square footage of commercial and retail space. Later on, they will be back with an overall development plan with detailed traffic, utility and infrastructure analysis. A final development plan will be the third and final step. Staff is working with WSB to evaluate traffic triggers as a result of the redevelopment. Staff is recommending approval of the preliminary plan with some conditions attached. 2 A g O-k Paul May, architect with Miller Dunwiddie Architecture, explained that the Pentagon Park was built in 1963 and is at the end of it useful life. The 135 acre site is located next to Fred Richards Golf Course, just off Highway 100, on West 77th Street and over to Parklawn Avenue. May said they are seeking rezoning for 43 acres. He said they are looking for feedback on what characteristics the ETC would like to see in the conceptual layout. Daniel Coyle, civil engineer with Kimley Horn Associates, said to demonstrate sustainability they will integrate bicycle movements, removing large pavement areas and use pervious pavers, create more friendly pedestrians walkways, etc. JoNette Kuhnau, transportation engineer with Kimley Horn Associates, said the traffic modeling they are using extends outside of the development area. She said they are studying various intersections within the area to see what impact they will have on the network. May said they've reviewed staff's conditions and is okay with them. Discussion focused on traffic triggers which Sullivan said is an extension of the AUAR but it does not consider everything in totality. He said. staff will be working with WSB to identify traffic triggers and costs as the different phases are bought online. Sullivan said the AUAR also identified growth for 2014 and 2030 and a portion of the City of Bloomington was also included in the AUAR. Kuhnau said the residential portion of the development will generate fewer trips than what is there today. Staffs recommendation is as follow: If so desired by the Transportation Commission, adopt a motion recommending that the Edina Gateway Pentagon Park Redevelopment traffic study is within the parameters set forth in the AUAR study and that the transportation component of the development application can move forward to the "Overall Development Plan" The Development team will meet the following conditions at the time that they submit an application for the Overall Development Plan. Conditions of the recommendation are as follows: 1. The Traffic Study needs to follow the requirements set forth in the ETC Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) guidelines adopted by the Transportation Commission. 2. All comments outlined in the WSB review memo dated October 31, 2007 should be addressed in the TIA. 3. All assumptions in the TIA need to be clearly identified, including but not limited to, development densities, phasing plans, background traffic growth, etc. 4. Relocation of the Fred Richards Golf Course entrance. 5. Acknowledgement and incorporation of a future roadway realignment and right of way dedication at the intersection of Parklawn and W. 77th. 6. All service entrances along W. 77th and other city roads be right -in /right out only. 7. Any other reasonable conditions as the project becomes further refined and defined in the Overall and Final Development Plans. A motion was made by Commissioner Brown to approve the recommendation by staff in a memo dated November 15. Seconded by Commissioner Mooty. 3 4-�3 All voted aye. Motion carried. A�� Z -07 -5 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Rezoning, Preliminary Development Plan, Zoning Ordinance Amendment James Nelson, Eberhardt Advisory, LLC 77th Street & Parklawn Avenue area STAFF PRESENTATION: Planner Teague informed the Commission at this time the'Edina Gateway Pentagon Park redevelopment team would like to present their redevelopment plan of the Pentagon Park office area on an informational basis. Planner Teague concluded the redevelopment request requires the following: • A Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment • Rezoning from Planned Office District to Mixed Development District -6 • Preliminary Development plan for the entire site • Zoning Ordinance Amendment'in the'MDD -6 District to reduce the minimum acreage amount from 50 acres to 20 acres. PRESENTATION BY DEVELOPMENT TEAM: Mr. Jim_ Nelson presented the development team; Laura Lindhom, Eberhardt; Craig Lau, Paul May and Daniel Green of Miller Dunwiddie, Daniel Coyle,"Todd Halunen and JoNette Kuhnau of Kimley Horn. MK Nelson addressed the. Commission and informed them he along with the development team are very enthused about the proposed revitalization of this area, adding they are present this evening to share their vision. Mr. Nelson presented the following points on the redevelopment of the Gateway area. They are as follows: • redevelopment of a mixed use area designed for intergenerational living • development of a state of the art Class A commercial space • construction 6f a hotel • revitalization of an aging commercial district • enhanced connections between uses • promotion of environmental stewardship and; • proposed design follows the evolving Comprehensive Plan without variances m 3 Continuing, Mr. Nelson related to the Commission a brief history of the area Mr. Nelson noted the proposed redevelopment would include: • an 80,000 GSF 150 room hotel • NW office building (4 -10 stories) supported by parking structure • E office building (4 -10 stories) supported by parking structure • SW office building (4 -12 stories) supported by parking,.' • 62 townhouse units north of West 77th Street • 492 independent living units north of West 77th Street • 151 unit assisted living building supported by parking north of West 77th Street Mr. Nelson also asked the Commission to note that Burgundy Place.which was recently rezoned and approved for redevelopment is located in the North West corner of the Pentagon office site area and not included in this development proposal. Concluding Mr. Nelson said over the next 25 years'Edina wilfsee an increase in residents 65 years and over. The proposal as presented would mix uses and create an integrated housing development including 'a, care facility component that would promote housing diversity: Continuing, Mr. Nelson said this mixed use area would also create recreational opportunities, medical clinic facilities as well as restaurant and service retail -uses. Mr. Nelson said he believes the proposed development is a new "gateway" for the future with the construction phase looking at complet(bn in 7 to 10 years. COMMENTS -FROM THE COMMISSION: Commissioners expressed We.following: the City is still in the process of amending the Comprehensive Plan; how does this fit • is tie proposal consistent with the existing Comprehensive Plan • , the project needs further or a true represtation of "green" areas • density and - traffic flow concerns • ensure,environmental, measures are implemented, solar panels, green roofs, ground source'heat pumps, etc. • the project has the appearance of over parking • there is concern about "rush hour' impact on intersections • density • height • appears the "mixed use" aspect of the proposal is "split ", pointing out housing appears on only one side of West 77th Street and is not integrated throughout the entire Pentagon office park site. py 4 Chair Lonsbury noted this is the Commissions first "look" at the proposal pointing out redevelopment of this area will occur in phases with the responsibility of the Commission to "react" to the plan on a general basis. Chair Lonsbury said the official public hearing on the Gateway proposal by the Planning Commission will be on November 28th. Chair Lonsbury invited any public present to speak to the proposal. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Mr. William Hanson, 7457 West Shore Drive, would like the developer to provide a photo mock -up (if at all possible) of what the hotel and office buildings would look like from his rear yard. He added .he is a'little worried about building height. Mr. Crane, 4952 Poppy Lane, told the Commission he applauds the developer and their interaction with the community; however he is still worried about building height. He added he would like the height capped at 50 feet. Mr. Crane said in his opinion buildings with - height should,be kept imthe France Avenue area of Edina. Mr. Tom Fletcher, 2190 Excelsior Boulevard,\ told the Commission he is a nearby Edina business owner and has_ some concern that the site has been designed with the backs or rear of the proposed housing element facing West 77th Street. Mr. Fletcher added he wants the developer to make sure the rear design of the project looks good and is "user""friendly'°'along West 77th Street. Ms. JoEllen. Dever, 7405 Oaklawn Avenue, said her concern is with the environment to include construction noise, increased traffic noise and emission pollution. \ Mr/ Peter Winsel;vrepresenting Seagate (adjoining business site) told the Commission his company has some concern about traffic, but is more concerned `about construction vibrations. He explained his business deals with very sensitive machines and,vibrations from construction equipment could have a negative impact -on equipment. Mrs. Crane, 4952 Poppy Lane, said she has a concern with the hotel and what a large retail,venture;such as this could pose for the area. Mrs. Crane said at this time she resides near an office park that is very quiet during the evenings and weekends. Introducing a retail element like the hotel and accompanying amenities will bring traffic into the area day and night. Concluding, Mrs. Crane said she is also worried about safety; especially from strangers wandering throughout the area. 4d7 Chair Lonsbury thanked the development team and neighbors for attending the meeting reiterating the Planning Commission will hear and act on this proposal at their November 28, 2007 Planning Commission meeting. A -07 -6 "Zoning Ordinance Amendments Building Height for Single- Family homes Setbacks for Egress Windows' STAFF PRESENTATION: Mr. Teague reminded the Commission over the past year, the City Council and Commission have had continued discussions on the "massing" issue, adding because. of these discussions the City Council has adopted three specific changes to the zoning. (Rebuild home- the lowest floor elevation of a new home may not be more than one -foot above the lowest floor elevation of the home that was torn down, a sliding scale setback on lots between 61 -75 feet'in width and bay windows were eliminated as a setback exception). Mr. Teague concluded that staff recommends revising the ordinance to take out the "rebuild home" only part and limit all construction, whether, it is a tear down rebuild or an addition to increasing the first floor elevation to no more than one foot above the existing first floor elevation. Mr. Teague explained the City Council has also requested the planning commission to examine the issue of setbacks for egress windows. The State Building Code requires the opening of a window well to be at least 4 feet from the house. According to the City Engineer, egress windows and their associated window wells; are causing drainage problems in side yards with homes that are located within 10 feet of the side lot line. Therefore, staff is recommending that the closest opening for a window well may not be closer than 5 feet to a side lot line. Chair Lonsbury invited members of the audience to speak to the proposed Ordinance changes: PUBLIC COMMENT: Mr. Fletcher, 5137 Halifax Avenue, told the Commission he lived at "ground zero" when one talks about massing. Mr. Fletcher said the continuing changes in his neighborhood have caused him to move to another community; however, he said as changes are made to the Code he doesn't want those changes to prevent him from improving his Edina property. A a g D DRAFT SUMMARY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 28, 2007 Z -07 -5 Preliminary Development Plan Review Wayzata Properties Pentagon Park area along 77th Street West STAFF PRESENTATION: Mr. Teague told the Commission the applicants are'again in, attendance this evening to introduce their redevelopment proposal at the regularly,scheduled public hearing before the Commission. Mr. Teague informed the Commission the applicant is proposing to tear down the buildings on the Pentagon Tower and Pentagon Quads site and build 634 senior housing units, an 80,000 square foot hotel, three office towers that would total 737,000 square feet, and two above ground parking structures. The Pentagon,Tower and Quad sites contain 660,500 square feet of office space today. Included in the project area are Burgundy Place, Walsh Title and 7600 Parklawn'office building, which will remain. The total site area is 43.18 acres. Mr. Teague explained the proposal before the Planning Commission is a Preliminary Development Plan4eview'and ultimately, the request would require the following: 1. A Comprehensive e - uide Plan Amendment from Office to Mixed Use. The mixed use designation, would allow office, retail and residential uses. 2. A Rezoning from Planned Office Development (POD) to Mixed Development District 6: ,(MDD -6.) 3. An Overall Development Plan for the entire project. 4 A Zoning Ordinance Amendment,in the MDD -6 District to reduce the minimum acreage amount from 50 acres to 20 acres. 5. - Final Development,, Plans for each site. Continuing;_ Mr. Teague: explained to the Commission in order to obtain the above irtioned-approvals, the "applicant must go through a three step process. That process is as follows: 1. Preliminary, Development Plan. A preliminary development plan is a review by the Planning Commission and City Council, in which approval simply allows the applicant to prepare an Overall Development Plan. Approval of the preliminary development plan requires a three -fifths vote of the City Council, but does not guarantee approval of the guide plan change, rezoning or overall development plan. 2. Overall Development Plan. The overall development plan would be the official approval /denial stage of the project. It would include official action AA on the comprehensive guide plan amendment, and rezoning. Approval of the overall development plan requires a four -fifths vote of the City Council. 3. Final Development Plan. Each phase of this multiple phase development is subject to final site plan review and action by the planning commission and city council. The .process is the same as the overall development plan, except that a three -fifths favorable vote of the City Council is required. The first phase of this project would be the hotel. The senior housing would likely be next, followed by the offices. Mr. Teague told the Commission the proponents are proposing that the first phase is the hotel tower, followed by housing and lastly office. Mr. Teague concluded staff recommends that the City Council approve the Preliminary Development Plan for the proposed. Gateway Development. Approval would authorize the applicant to apply for an Overall Development Plan. An Overall Development Plan application would include a Comprehensive Guide Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Zoning Ordinance Amendment. Mr. Teague stated Preliminary Overall Development Plan approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1. The Overall Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plan dated September 28, 2007, and revised October 24, 2007. 2. Sustainable design. The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative. 3. Trail and sidewalk connections must be included as demonstrated on the preliminary plans. Public easements must be established over all public sidewalks. 4. Dedication of a right -of -way easement to straighten out the curve at 77th Street & Parklawn. The area of the easement is subject to approval of the City Engineer. 5. The easternmost entrance off of 77th Street into the senior housing development must be designed as a shared entrance with the golf course. 6. The four -story senior independent buildings that face 77th Street must be designed so as not to appear as the back side of buildings. 7. All traffic mitigation measures as required by the transportation commission and traffic study must be followed. 8. The directional flows of the sanitary must be resolved prior to any construction of the project. 9. The developer /applicant would be responsible to pay their fair share of any mitigation measures that would be required as part of an approval of an overall development plan for the site. A 3b 2 10. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the Fire Marshal. 11. Buildings on the north side of 77th Street shall be limited to 4 stories or 50 feet, which ever is less, and must maintain a 50 foot setback from the rear lot line. 12. Convenience gasoline stations and drive - through windows shall be prohibited on the north side of 77th Street. 13. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in; the City Engineer's memo dated November 20, 2007. APPLICANT PRESENTATION: Mr. Jim Nelson presented the development team;;Craig Lau, Paul May and Daniel Green of Miller Dunwiddie, Daniel Coyle, Todd, Halunen and JoNette Kuhnau of Kimley Horn. Mr. Nelson briefly addressed the Commission informing them the development team is very enthusiastic about the project, and in their opinion the proposed redevelopment revitalizes an aging commercial area. Mr. Nelson said they also agree to the conditions of approval set forth in the staff report. Mr. Dan Coyle presented to the Commission a power'point presentation outlining the projects process ,and highlights: Steps in the process are as follows: • AUAR Environmental Review • Preliminary Development Plan (all phases) which includes: Zoning Ordinance_ amendment for MDD -6, Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezdning from PCD -2, POD 1& 2 to MDD -6, Preliminary Development Plan. • , Overall Development Plan (all phases) Final Development Plan (for each "hase) Mr. Coyle asked the`Commission to note the projects design does not require variances, and follows the evolving Comprehensive Plan, with construction phasing in 7 to 10 years. Mr. Coyle explained the project also achieves the following: • Provides choices;/,, • Encourages mined -use development • Preserves Urban Centers • Varies transportation options • Creates neighborhood identity • Builds vibrant public spaces • Protect Resources A) 1 3 �r L 1 • Conserves landscapes. Mr. Coyle further explained the plans have been revised to include 27% plantings at grade, 9% pervious pavement, and 7% green roof for a total of 43% pervious surface. Mr. Coyle and Mr. Paul explained the proposed redevelopment of the 43+ acre site as follows: Burgundy Place — mixed use site which includes 36 residential units and 15,560 FSF of retail. 75 parking stall are provided: • Proposed NW Office Building — 230 GSF Office space (4 -10 stories) 100 parking stalls • West parking ramp — proposed at 7 levels, 1350 stalls • East office building- 260 GSF office space (4 -10 stories) 100 parking stalls • East parking ramp — proposed at 5 levels, 1050 stalls • Hotel, 80,000 GSF, 150 proposed hotel rooms . • 62 townhouse units with 124 enclosed parking.stalls • 366 independent living units with 309 enclosed stalls • 206 assisted living units with 105 stalls at grade and 300 enclosed stalls. Mr. Coyle said the entire project includes a-- number of proposed pedestrian and vehicle connections and reiterated development is in phases. Concluding Mr. Coyle presented photos of the project site as it exists today and future depictions of the project from different points in the adjoining residential neighborhoods. COMMENTS FROM THE COMMISSION: Commissioners were generally favorable with the project; however, they raised the following issues: • 'Can more housing be constructed or, does the site need to strictly adhere to the mixed use. ratio • questions on organizing the parameters of the mixed use zoning district • Is MDD -6 the right zoning? Does it limit choices? Could the Pentagon area be better served with different zoning? • questions raised on, prorating — when does development trigger certain ratios (residential, office; retail) • residential area appears insolated — how can it be integrated more into the rest of the\site • The real need,to somehow connect the site so residents can easily access the shops, offices, etc. • Be careful on over - parking the site. Commissioners said they understand parking for the project meets Code, but less parking is better, especially in light of the fact that the project has demonstrated it can provide parking per Code requirements. �3o 4 + r COMMENTS FROM THE PUBLIC: Mrs. Alice Hulbert, 7221 Tara Road, suggested to the Commission that as they consider this project they should keep in mind the promenade area of Edina and how a bicycle link to that area and to other parts of the City can be achieved. Mr. Joseph Hulbert, 7507 West Shore Drive, told the Commission his interest is directly to his north, which is the location of the proposed Burgundy Place. Mr. Hulbert said he wants Burgundy Place to be constructed. Mr. Hulbert added if the frontage road /Hwy 100 intersection is reconfigured a sound or noise. wall should be considered. Mr. Hulbert said he 6uld appreciate it if staff would mention the desire residents have for a sound "wall on this stretch of road when they speak with MNDOT. Mr. Crain, 4952 Poppy Lane, with the aid. of photo's showed the Commission the view of the project area from his rear yard: � Mr. Crain acknowledged there are buildings of height across the highway but those buildings (Sheraton or Hotel Sofitel) are over 4000 feet away, pointing out the subject site is a little over 800 feet from their rear property line. Concluding, Mr. Crain said he would like careful consideration given to building height, adding a noise or sound wall would help reduce any visual impact of the project. Ms. Jo Ellen Dever, 7405 Oaklawn Avenue, questioned if the hotel would need a beacon light, adding she,also`has a concern with reflective light. - - -----Commissioner Grabiel moved to close the public - hearin Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion,_., All.voted aye; motion carried. COMMENTS /ACTION BY THE COMMISSION: Chair Lonsbury reminded the.,Commission and the public that the project before them this evening will be developed in phases and the action the Commission needs to take this evening is to approve or deny the Preliminary Overall ,Development PlanJor the project known as Edina Gateway. Continuing, Chair Lonsbury reiterated this is a multi phased project and each phase is subject to final site,)plan review and action by both the Commission and Council. Chair Lonsbury stated if he understands correctly the first phase of the project is'the development of the hotel site, followed by housing and lastly the office towers',,Concluding, Chair Lonsbury stated because of the new term limits imposed some of�us will not be able to see this project through to its end, adding those Commissioners who are still present during these development phases should remember these conversations and the `order" the Commission believed redevelopment would occur. Commissioner Schroeder moved to recommend Preliminary Overall Development Plan Approval subject to: 433 5 • The Overall Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plan dated September 28, 2007, and revised October 4, 2007. • Sustainable design. The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative. • Trail and sidewalk connections must be included as demonstrated and public easements must be established over all public sidewalks. • Dedication of a right -of -way to straighten out the curve at 77th Street and Parklawn (this area of easement is subject to approval of the City Engineer). • The easternmost entrance off of 77th Street into the senior housing development must be designed as a shared entrance (with the golf course) • The four -story senior independent buildings that face 77th street must be designed so as not to appear as the back side of buildings. • All traffic mitigation measures as required by the Transportation Commission and traffic study must be followed. • The directional flows of the sanitary must be resolved prior to any construction of the project. • The developer /applicant would be responsible to pay their fair share of any mitigation measures that would be required as part of an approval of the overall development plan for the site. • All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the Fire Marshall. • Buildings at 4970 West 77th Street shall be limited to 4 stories or 50 feet which ever is less, and must maintain a 50 foot setback from the rear lot line. • Convenience gasoline stations and drive - through windows shall be prohibited on the north side of 77th Street and • Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the City Engineer's memo dated November 20, 2007. Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion. Commissioners again expressed their general support for the project as presented; however, they acknowledged the difficulty in phasing especially as it relates to the market. Commissioners reiterated their concerns with flexibility especially in the office park area, the importance of preserving Burgundy Place, connectivity, and again phasing and how the ratios would work if certain markets soften. Chair Lonsbury called the vote: Ayes; Scherer, Staunton, Schroeder, Fischer, Brown, Grabiel, Forrest, and Lonsbury. Nay; Risser. Motion carried. Mt n Jackie Hoogenakker From: Doherty, Val [VDoherty @DohertyEmployment.com] nt: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 6:16 PM . o: Jackie Hoogenakker Cc: Doherty, Tim Subject: Preliminary Development Plan We are the owners of two buildings in Edina, one of which is located at 7625 Parklawn Avenue, very near the proposed development site. We are very concerned about the impact on traffic that adding 700+ housing units, an 80,000 square foot hotel and the 3 office towers would have. Although the new towers are approx. the same square footage as the existing Pentagon Tower /Quad buildings, we envision that the occupancy in the newer towers will be substantially higher. With this occupancy, and the hundreds /thousands of cars traveling to visit, work at (or live in) the proposed new buildings, we do not believe that West 77th St. handle this. When our employees leave our office building at 5:00 in the evening, traffic is already backed up, particularly at the stop -light at 77th Street and Parklawn (where, as an aside, we believe a turn on the Parklawn red light turning onto 77th St. should be allowed). The road is ill- equipped to handle the current residents — it's difficult to imagine what it would be like if hundreds or thousands of cars were added to the mix, and that's only after the road and the drivers endure months of demolition and construction equipment. Besides the traffic issues, will the developers absorb the increased costs borne by the city associated with this new development, so that our property taxes are not affected by this proposed addition? At this point, we are not in favor of this proposal. T�- and Valerie Doherty rty Employment Group, Inc. Parklawn Avenue Edina, MN 55435 Ph: (952) 832 -8381 Fax: (952) 356 -1957 ydoherty(o) dohertyhro.com 11/5/2007 From: RondaMJMD @aol.com [mailto:RondaMJMD @ aol.com] Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 4:57 PM To: Laura Fulton Subject: AUAR/Gateway study Dear Planning Commission members and City Council Members, I reside at 4512 Hibiscus Ave. in a residential neighborhood in Southeast Edina. I disagree with the developer Wayzata Properties, Inc. that their proposed developments "would not impact residential areas" (Edina Sun Current, Sept. 20, 2007, page 8A). When I first heard about proposed development along the south of Fred Richards golf course I met with the Mayor to discuss my concerns. I told him that we live in a suburban neighborhood that is boxed in on three sides by industrial /office areas. I told him that it is essential to the health and future home values of our neighborhood that the Fred Richards golf course remain intact and that no higher buildings be built on the southern edge. Mr. Hovland's response to me was, "I wish you people wouldn't listen to these rumors! I don't know why people put those rumors out there!" Well, there has now been a city council meeting where the demise of Fred Richards has been addressed, the developer plans on completing their hotel by next winter, and they plan to raise the heights of buildings up to 14 stories tall!!! If allowed to go forth with these plans, the sewer line capacity is not the only red flag that should be seriously thought out! What these developments would do to our neighborhood's character is also very serious! We do not want to have to look at a hotel! Especially at night when it's lit up! Also, the height of buildings along Fred Richards will significantly and negatively affect our neighborhood! We don't want to see office buildings from our homes and streets! Additional height to what is there now would be a terrible eyesore, particularly at night when they would be lit up as well as all fall, winter and spring when our leaves are down and we have to stare at buildings instead of green trees! I'm seriously concerned that you are not doing enough to protect the quality of where I live and my home value. Again, we did not move here and invest a lot of money, time, sweat and emotion in order to see our neighborhood go urban! We shouldn't have to put up a big fight in order for you to realize the detrimental affect higher buildings will have on our neighborhoods character! You should be standing up to developers for us! How would you like to stare out your front window and have to look at the lights and walls of office buildings and a hotel? Also, did you happen to read the recent article in the Star - Tribune about the harmful affects of the chemicals microwave popcorn plants emit? Our neighborhood has had to put up with the constant emissions from the nearby plant for years! We were told the company would use filters to stop the smells but they never did! It's about time the city moves in a direction that will help our neighborhood - -not hurt it! Our property is just as important as the developer's!!! We just don't happen to be able to afford lobbyists to go in front of Edina's decision makers and fight for our rights. So I hope you'll make sure to limit development in the Gateway area to a level that will TRULY not impact the established neighborhood! Sincerely and I hope I'll be able to add respectfully, Marie Sullivan 4512 Hibiscus Ave. Edina, MN 55435 Property Management October 31, 2007 TO: Edina Planning Commission FROM: Tom Fletcher Fletcher Management, Inc. RE Edina Gateway Proposal www.fietchernin.com Our office building is located across the street from the east end of the proposed project. While the proposed development plan makes sense to me in a general sense (All things being equal I would prefer to have office buildings across the street, but Senior Housing is certainly fine as well.), I do have the following questions regarding it. 1. MDD -6 appears to be very wide open development tool. While it may apply to a Centennial Lakes type development, I question whether it applies here. What is being proposed is really two standalone developments that have no connection to each other except for current common ownership and the fact that they are on opposite sides of the same street. All plans are very preliminary and subject to change. Is granting MDD -6 putting the cart before the horse from the City's standpoint? Wouldn't it make the most sense to zone each parcel for it's intended use (e.g. office for office and senior for senior) once more detailed plans are provided? Is there a danger that we could end up with a completely different and less desirable development if MDD -6 is approved? 2. What is the developer's financial capacity? The proposed and approved Burgundy Place is currently a dirt lot. Could we have more of the same? The Pentagon Office Park currently suffers from a very high vacancy rate (possibly as high as 40% according to our information). Can the developer make the project happen as proposed or could we end up with something completely different or even another dirt lot? 3. What is the impact of this proposed development on the sewer system capacity and will that affect limit other development options in the area? What is the Edina Engineering Department and Met Council position on this? 4. Will the proposed senior housing realistically require a new stop light on West 77th Street for left turns from the housing to go to France Avenue? Thank you for your time and consideration. 4445 West 77th Steet Suite 102: Edina, MN: 55435 PH: 952.224.5555 FX: 952.224.5556 E: info @ftetchermn.com www.fietchermn.com r M FLETCHER Management, Inc. TO: Edina Planning Commission FROM: Tom Fletcher Fletcher Management, Inc. RE Edina Gateway Proposal www.fietchernin.com Our office building is located across the street from the east end of the proposed project. While the proposed development plan makes sense to me in a general sense (All things being equal I would prefer to have office buildings across the street, but Senior Housing is certainly fine as well.), I do have the following questions regarding it. 1. MDD -6 appears to be very wide open development tool. While it may apply to a Centennial Lakes type development, I question whether it applies here. What is being proposed is really two standalone developments that have no connection to each other except for current common ownership and the fact that they are on opposite sides of the same street. All plans are very preliminary and subject to change. Is granting MDD -6 putting the cart before the horse from the City's standpoint? Wouldn't it make the most sense to zone each parcel for it's intended use (e.g. office for office and senior for senior) once more detailed plans are provided? Is there a danger that we could end up with a completely different and less desirable development if MDD -6 is approved? 2. What is the developer's financial capacity? The proposed and approved Burgundy Place is currently a dirt lot. Could we have more of the same? The Pentagon Office Park currently suffers from a very high vacancy rate (possibly as high as 40% according to our information). Can the developer make the project happen as proposed or could we end up with something completely different or even another dirt lot? 3. What is the impact of this proposed development on the sewer system capacity and will that affect limit other development options in the area? What is the Edina Engineering Department and Met Council position on this? 4. Will the proposed senior housing realistically require a new stop light on West 77th Street for left turns from the housing to go to France Avenue? Thank you for your time and consideration. 4445 West 77th Steet Suite 102: Edina, MN: 55435 PH: 952.224.5555 FX: 952.224.5556 E: info @ftetchermn.com www.fietchermn.com RESOLUTION #1 The Edina Chamber of Commerce's Government Affairs Committee, at its duly - convened meeting of December 4, 2007, voted in favor, with one abstaining, Jennifer Bennerotte of the City of Edina, of the following Resolution and recommended that the Board of the Edina Chamber pass the same: The Edina Chamber of Commerce endorses the preliminary plan presented by Wayzata Properties for the redevelopment of the Pentagon Park properties known as the Edina Gateway Project. The motion passed via an e-mail vote as follows, one abstained, Gordon Hughes, City of Edina; one no vote, John Donnelly, Donnelly Development. The resolution will be sent to the Edina City Council by the Chamber President. RESOLUTION #2 The Edina Chamber of Commerce's Government Affairs Committee, at its duly - convened meeting of February 14, 2006, unanimously voted in favor of the following Resolution and recommends that the Board of the Edina Chamber pass the same: The Resolution having duly been moved and seconded, the Board of the Edina Chamber of Commerce, at its duly- convened meeting on Tuesday, February 14, 2006, votes to recommend that the Edina City Council vote to support the Gabbert & Beck — GalleriaMestin Hotel Project. RESOLUTION #3 The Edina Chamber of Commerce's Government Affairs Committee, at its duly - convened meeting of February 14, 2006, unanimously voted in favor of the following Resolution and recommends that the Board of the Edina Chamber pass the same: The Resolution having duly been moved and seconded, the Board of the Edina Chamber of Commerce, at its duly- convened meeting on Tuesday, February 14, 2006, votes to support the proposed Motor Vehicle Sales Tax Constitutional Amendment. 1 2007 2008 A M J J A S O N D J F M A M J J Task F M 1: AUAR (environmental impact, capacity study) I Planning Commission City Council - Nov 5 2: Preliminary Development Plan (All Phases - basic organization size massing, preliminary zoning, preliminary comp plan change, preliminary traffic) * I Transp. Commission (info - Oct 18) Planning Commission (info - Oct 31)" _ Transp. Commission (action - Nov 15) Planning Commission (action - Nov 28) T City Council Dec 18 * 3: Overall Development Plan (All Phases - final zoning, phasing plan, final traffic, final comp plan) Transp. Commission (action - Feb 21) Planning Commission (action - Feb 26) City Council (action - Mar 4) 4: Final Development Plan (individual building projects) * Hotel (transp - Feb 21) I I Hotel (planning commission - Feb 26) Hotel (city council - Mar 4) miller dunwiddie 123 North Third street Suite 104 Minneapolis MN 55401 -1657 www. millerdunwiddie.com p 612 - 337 -0000 t 612 - 337 -0031 Wley -Horn \� and Associates. Inc. Wayzata Properties. LLC. EDINA GATEWAY pentagon park redevelopment - preliminary development plan wl Z. J U Q �I FRED RICHARDS GOLF COURSE I � � B S -9 I 5 -9 - 0 — o �'I a G,? 68' 8' 83 65'1 r( 1-60��' EAST /WEST COLLECTOR CONCEPTUAL CURVE IMPACT TO PRELIMINARY PLAN -------------------------------------------- ------ —� C (�� ' PREPARED 11 -07 -2007 BASED ON CITY OF EDINA DIAGRAM OF 11 -07 -2007 II I I I I K I I I l � I I I I i I it I I I 1 I 1 I ; I I 1. i- __ I EXISTING PHASE 4 I 'Z e 68' 48 184' 60' 1 122'x° 126' 1 53 x ,. j I 1 I I f 1 e s 1 lO � l QD / PROPOSED LANE AND BOULEVARD DIMENSIONS FOR EAST/WEST COLLECTOR - CONTINUATION OF PARKLAWN AVENUE SECTION miller dunwiddie I =� Kimley -Horn \ and Associates, Inc. GATEWAY EDINA 123fJorthThirdStree15ui1e104 Wayzata Prop erties. LL& pentagon park redevelopment - preliminary development plan MN 55401 1657 Mmneap -s www -m iUerdu nwtddle.com p 612- 337 -0000 f 612 - 337-0031 rn 400' 68 x 8 314' 181 ' . 02' 7 r ? ` 0 � - -- -- ------------- - - - - -� --0 -- - - -- - - - - - ---------- -- _- - - - -- - - - - -- 'x W 77TH ST I Own) Ir q < w e Z 40' SETBACK USING N a = AREA OF PROPOSED BUILDING IN PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT s -s I a s -9 MDD -6 REQ. AND =I PRELIMINARY PLAN PLAN THAT WOULD BE IMPACTED Q BUILDING HEIGHT BY COLLECTOR ALIGNOMENTTUAL PROPOSED LANE AND BOULEVARD DIMENSIONS FOR EAST/WEST COLLECTOR - CONTINUATION OF PARKLAWN AVENUE SECTION miller dunwiddie I =� Kimley -Horn \ and Associates, Inc. GATEWAY EDINA 123fJorthThirdStree15ui1e104 Wayzata Prop erties. LL& pentagon park redevelopment - preliminary development plan MN 55401 1657 Mmneap -s www -m iUerdu nwtddle.com p 612- 337 -0000 f 612 - 337-0031 SECTION AND PLAN - SENIOR OUTDOOR ENVIRONMENT ` aInd frlal8ly ASP 7 .St yv �•► ♦ 7 _ w � r miller dunwiddie C]MFI Kimley -Horn M and Associates, Inc. 123 North Third Strut Suite 104 MinroapolisMN 53401 -1657 Wayzata Properties. LLC www.mliterdunwiddle.com p 612 - 337 -0000 f 612 - 337 -0031 MAW T _rJ Ar I,} -r• � .::,gal 1 t �i- �• rr-. , Z!A�! `- 'r r is� I � r• -" roo Lip, �rr o E V4_ktu E DIN GATEWAY pentagon park redevelopment - preliminary development plan PENTAGON QUADS BARR NGINEERING 8500 PHOTO TAKEN MONDAY 29 OCTOBER 2007 NORMANDALE FROM END OF KELLOGG AVENUE LAKE BLVD miller dunwiddie IM� Kimley -Horn °CHITECTURE `_ and Associates. Inc. WP 123 North Third Street Suite 104 Wayzata Properties, LLC. Minneapolis MN 55401-1657 www. m iUerdu mwfdd ie_com p 612- 337 -OD00 f 612 - 337 -OMI t t PENTAGON BURGUNDY TOWER PLACE SITE SHERATON HOTEL EDINA GATEWAY pentagon park redevelopment - preliminary development plan SENIOR HOUSING miller dunwiddie IMFj Kimley -Horn \� and Associates. Inc. 123 North Third Street Sufle 104 Minneapolis MN 55401 -1657 www.mitterdunwkkiie.com p 612 - 337 -0000 f 612- 337 -0031 Wayzata Properties, LLC. BARB ENGINEERING 8500 NORMANDALE LAKE BLVD NEW BURGUNDY OFFICE PLACE SHERATON HOTEL EDINA GATEWAY pentagon park redevelopment - preliminary development plan PHOTO TAKEN TUESDAY 06 NOVEMBER 2007 W, .. 10 rk" OW M p.; BARR WALSH PENTAGON BURGUNDY ENGINEERING TITLE TOWER PLACE SITE t- F " Miller dunwiddie C=F1 Kimley -Horn � and Associates, In 123 North Third Street Suite 104 Minneapolis MN 55401 -1657 www.m illerdunwbddie.com p 612 -337 -0000 f 612 - 337 -0031 Wayzata Properties. LLC. P- d :,. EDINA GATEWAY pentagon park redevelopment - preliminary development plan PHOTO TAKEN TUESDAY 06 NOVEMBER 2007 Ir BARR WALSH NEW BURGUNDY ENGINEERING TITLE OFFICE PLACE pr www� Miller dun"fiddie Pp'= 1(imley-Horn .'°rHITF and Associates. Inc. 123 North Third Street Suite 104 Minneapolis MN 5541-1657 www.mitterdunwkkiie.com p 612-337-O000 f 612-337-003I Wayzata Properties, LLC rl E IN D A GATEWAY pentagon park redevelopment - preliminary development plan +,— BARR WALSH PENTAGON BURGUNDY ENGINEERING TITLE TOWER PLACE SITE miller dunwiddie L7=Fj Kimley -Horn TEXTURE and Associates. Inc. 123 North Third Street Su%e 104 Minneapolis MN 55401 -1657 Wayzata Properties.LlC www. m i tte rd u nwlddie.com p 612- 337 -ODDO f 612- 337 -0031 GATEWAY EDINA pe ntagon park redevelopment - preliminary development plan BARR ENGINEERING Miller dunwiddie I =n Kimley -Horn ,. "WT- \ and Associates. Inc 123 Nash Third Street Suite 104 Minneapolis MN 55401 -1657 www.milierdu nwiddie_com p 612 - 337 -ODDO f 612 -337 -0031 WALSH NEW BURGUNDY TITLE OFFICE PLACE WP Wayzata Properties. LLC ATE AY EDINA pentagon park redevelopment - preliminary development plan v,- PHOTO TAKEN TUESDAY 06 NOVEMBER 2007 ` BURGUNDY PENTAGON SHERATON PLACE SITE TOWER HOTEL Miller dunwiddie CIMFI Kimley -Horn ARC ,T�_T, . and Associates. Inc. 123 North Third Sbvet Suite 104 Minneapolis MN 55401 -1657 www. m i lierdunwiddie.com p 612- 337 -0000 f 612 - 337 -0031 Wayzata Properties. LLC. EDINA GATEWAY pentagon park redevelopment - preliminary development plan PHOTO TAKEN TUESDAY 06 NOVEMBER 2007 BURGUNDY NEW OFFICE SHERATON PLACE HOTEL Miller dunwiddie ❑ Kimley -Horn and Associates. Inc 123 North Third street Suite 104 Minneapolis MN 55401-16,57 www.MiUerdunwiddie.com p 612 -337 -0000 f 612 - 337 -OMI Wayzata Properties, LLC GATEWAY EDINA pentagon park redevelopment - preliminary development plan KEFUl {'1%KLL✓ UMMLN UA l lUN To: City Council Agenda Item - W.A. From: Gordon Hughes Consent F] City Manager Information Only FI Date: 12/14/07 Mgr. Recommends To HRA Subject: Ordinance 2007 -1 amending section ® To Council 180 of the City Code to require removal of members from boards Action Motion and commissions who fail to comply with attendance ❑ Resolution requirements. Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: Grant first reading. Info /Background: In accordance with the Council's direction, I have prepared the attached ordinance which amends section 180 of the City Code with respect to the attendance requirements of board and coirunission members. Currently, the City Code allows the Council to remove a board and conunission member who misses three consecutive meetings or four meetings in a calendar year. The proposed ordinance provides that a board and comnussion member will be deemed to have resigned if he or she inisses three consecutive meetings or fails to attend at least 75 percent of the regular or special meetings during a calendar year. This ordinance will take effect for board and conunission meetings January 2, 2008 and later. Board and commission members have already been advised that the council intends to adopt this new policy. Staff recommends first reading. EDINA ORDINANCE NO. 2007-21 An Ordinance Amending Section 180 of the City Code to Require Removal of Members from Boards and Commissions Who Fail to Comply with Attendance Requirements THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CTTY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Subsection 180,02 of the City Code is amended to read as follows: "180.02 Removal. Any member of a board, commission or committee established by the City Code who fails to attend three consecutive meetings, whether regular or special, or who fails to attend at least 75% of the scheduled meetings in any calendar year, whether regular or special, shall be deemed to have resigned as a member of the board, commission or committee. The requirement of this subsection shall not apply to attendance at meetings of committees or subcommittees established by a board; commission or committee. Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall be effective upon passage. The provisions of Section I of this ordinance shall apply to board, commission and committee meetings conducted on January 2, 2008, and thereafter. First Reading: December 18, 2007 Second Reading: �1 o e REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # V.A. From: Sherry Engelman, R.S. Consent City Sanitarian Information Only ❑ Date: December 18, 2007 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject:. Set Special Assessment Action ® Motion Hearing Date For Garbage ❑ Resolution and Refuse Removal No. E] Ordinance REF -07 ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Set a Special Assessment Public Hearing date for January 15, 2008 for Garbage and Refuse Removal No. REF -07. Info /Background: Due to lack of response by the property owner to remove garbage and debris from the property located at 5640 Wooddale Ave, staff arranged for such removal. Cost to the City totals $822.93, which includes removal, staff involvement and the $30 administrative fee. The property owner was billed for this cost however payment has not been submitted. It IIn i NO& ffi� REPORURECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Boyd Tate Traffic Safety Coordinator Date December 18, 2007 Subject: Traffic Safety Staff Review for December 5, 2007. Recommendation: Agenda Item: V. B. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Review and approve Traffic Safety Staff Review of Wednesday, December 5, 2007. Info /Background: It is not anticipated that residents will be in attendance at the Council meeting regarding any of the attached issues. TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 5, 2007 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on December 5, 2007. Staff present included the City Engineer, Assistant City Engineer, Traffic Safety Coordinator, City Planner, Sign Coordinator and Police Lieutenant. From that review, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were also informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the December 18, 2007, Council Agenda. SECTION A: Requests on which staff recommends approval: 1. Request for a pedestrian crosswalk crossing Edinborough Way, at the north leg of the intersection with Minnesota Drive. This request is from a resident of Edinborough Condominiums who crosses at this intersection daily on her way to and from work. She states that she crosses during both the morning and evening rush hours and that cars seldom yield to pedestrians. Edinborough Way is a north/south through street at this intersection. Minnesota Drive is controlled with a stop sign. Edinborough Way is a 52 -foot wide B -Minor Arterial street with curb, gutter and a sidewalk on the east side. The Mon. -Fri. average daily traffic count is 3,453 with an 85`h- percentile speed of 38.9 mph. Minnesota Drive is also a B -Minor Arterial with a Mon. -Fri. average daily traffic count of 9,619 with an 85`h- percentile speed of 37.1 mph. There are two bus stops on Edinborough Way just north of Minnesota Drive (one north and one south). Bus officials state these stops are used as start, stop and layover locations for several bus routes that generate many riders. There have been three reported accidents at this intersection in the past five years (1- injury, 1 -poss. injury and 1- property damage). None involved pedestrians. Traffic Safety Staff Review December 5, 2007 Page 1 of 3 Relevant speed, volumes, accident records, pedestrian counts, sight obstructions and demographic analysis have been reviewed and a pedestrian crosswalk at this location does meet warrants. Requestor is aware, that if approved, the crosswalk would not be installed until spring. Staff recommends the approval of a painted and signed pedestrian crosswalk crossing the north leg of Edinborough Way at the intersection of Minnesota Drive. Crosswalk to be installed as weather permits in the spring. 2. Request for a speed limit sign for east bound Interlachen Boulevard at Ridge Road. The requestor is a resident on Ridge Road near the intersection of Interlachen Boulevard who is concerned with the speed of the east bound Interlachen Boulevard traffic coming down the hill. Requestor states that many times during the day she sees cars exceeding the speed limit when they pass Ridge Road which is at the bottom of the hill. Interlachen Boulevard is a 26 -foot wide city street with curb, gutter and no sidewalks. There are currently no speed limit signs posted for either direction on this stretch of roadway. A radar survey was conducted in late November which showed that forty - percent of the vehicles studied exceeded the 30 -MPH limit. The radar trailer was also placed in this area to remind motorists of their speed. At one time this stretch of Interlachen Boulevard was a dead end road to the west and speed limit signs were not warranted. However, staff feels that due to the increase in traffic that a speed limit sign is now warranted. Staff recommends the approval of a 30 -MPH speed limit sign in the area on Interlached Boulevard and Ridge Road, location to be determined by the Sign Coordinator. 3. Request for a "10- Minute Loading & Un- loading Only" sign in the area of 4942 France Ave. This request comes from Marty's Barber Shop who has many elderly customers who get dropped off and picked up at his business. He is requesting that this sign be placed somewhere near his business. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 2 of 3 December 5, 2007 The current parking restrictions on France Avenue from 49 -1/2 Street to 50th Street are as follows: "No Parking Anytime" from 4924 north to 49 %Z Street. "One Hour Parking 8 -am to 4 -pm and No Parking 4 -6 pm Mon. - Fri." from 4924 south to just south of 4936. There is a bus stop at 4949 and "No Parking Anytime" runs south to 50th Street. The "No Parking 4 -6 pm Mon -Fri" restrictions were implemented in November of 1998 as an operational traffic flow change for the Pinehurst Properties at 4999 France Ave. Staff is recommending approval of the following: Remove the time restrictions in the area running from 4930 to 4936 France Avenue. This area will then be signed "One Hour Parking ", and sign the bus stop "10- Minute Loading & Unloading Only." . Staff is recommending approval of changing the time restrictions on France Avenue from 4930 to 4936 to "One Hour Parking Only" and adding a 1110- Minute Loading & Unloading Only" sign at the bus stop at 4948 France Avenue and request that Hennepin County implement these changes. SECTION B: Requests on which staff recommends denial of request: None for December 5, 2007 meeting. SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others: None for December 5, 2007 meeting. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 3 of 3 December 5, 2007 REPUK` , A IUN To: City Council Agenda Item - V.C. From: Ceil Smith Consent Assistant to the City Manager Information Only Date: 12/14/07 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA Subject: Labor Contract for Local 320 Public ® To Council Safety Dispatchers Action ® Motion Resolution Ordinance Discussion Recommendation: Approve the 2008 - 2009 Labor Contract Local 320 Union - Public Safety Dispatchers Info/Background: The City and the Union have agreed to the following items: 1. Duration - A two year contract for 2008 and 2009. 2. Wages - 3.5% increase in 2008 and a 3.5% increase in 2009. This matches what has been agreed to for the Public Works Union, and keeps the City's dispatchers comparable to other dispatchers working in the metro area. 3. Insurance - Increase the City contribution by $25 for 2008 and in 2009 accept the increase in the City contribution approved by the City Council. 4. Lon evi - The City agreed to a longevity plan, similar to the plans within the Police and Fire contracts. To: Mayor & City Council From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: December 18, 2007 Subject: Resolution Receiving Donations Recommendation: Adopt Resolution. REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item V.D. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Info/Background: In order to comply with State Statutes all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. RESOLUTION NO. 2007-131 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Donations to the Edina Art Center: Richard and Judith Schmidt $10.00 J. Bradley Stone $100.00 Jeanne Moynihan $60.00 Donations to the Braemar Memorial Fund for future Golf Course equipment purchases: William Cunningham $25.00 Raymond O'Connell $200.00 Edina Women's Golf Association $50.00 Richard Windham $50.00 Raymond Engh $25.00 Donation to Edina Police Department: Brian Asleson $50.00 Dated: December 18, 2007 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 18, 2007 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 20_. City Clerk REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: City Council Agenda Item V. E. From: James B. Hovland Consent ❑ Mayor Information Only ❑ Date: December 18, 2007 Mgr. Recommends F To HRA Construction Board of Appeals ® To Council Subject: Re- appointments to Boards, Janet Johnson Commissions & Committees Action ® Motion Edina Community Health Committee Resolution Edina Community Health Committee Ordinance Edina Community Health Committee Discussion Info/Background: The following applicants have returned their applications requesting reappointment: Name Committee Heather Randall King Art Center Board John Helling Board of Appeal & Equalization Craig Johnson Board of Appeal & Equalization Gordon Tuchenhagen Board of Appeal & Equalization John Glover Construction Board of Appeals Douglas Mayo East Edina Housing Foundation Janet Johnson Edina Community Health Committee Mark E Johnson Edina Community Health Committee Mary Jo Kingston Edina Community Health Committee Idelle Longman Edina Community Health Committee Mary Brindle Human Rights & Relations Commission Wayne Prochniak Human Rights & Relations Commission Stephen Brown Planning Commission Floyd Grabiel Planning Commission Geoffrey Workinger Transportation Commission Edward Schwartzbauer Zoning Board of Appeals Jeffrey Johnson has indicated his intention to return his reappointment application, but to date it has not been received. He serves on the Board of Appeal and Equalization. Amy Jo Wimmer also serves on the Board of Appeal and Equalization and has not returned her application and we have not been able to connect with her. Reappointment of these individuals should be contingent upon submittal of the appropriate reappointment application. Deborah McNeil has declined re- appointment to the Human Rights & Relations Commission. "w To: City Council From: Gordon Hughes City Manager Date: 12/14/07 Subject: Indemnity Agreement - Opus Northwest Recommendation: Authorize attached Indemnity Agreement Info /Background: KEFUK'1 /KULOMMENUA IUN Agenda Item - V. F. Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends F] To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion Resolution Ordinance . Discussion The City has entered into negotiations with Opus Northwest ( "Opus ") concerning the proposed redevelopment of the Edina Public Works property and the relocation of the Public Works facility to the Conagra building. The process associated with the City's consideration of these projects will be extensive and will continue through the first one half of 2008. Even if the projects are eventually approved, it is unlikely that the City will take possession of the Conagra building until mid- summer. Based upon this schedule, Opus and staff are concerned about delaying the start of architectural drawings for the renovation of the Conagra building until the City takes possession. (Such a delay will have the effect of significantly delaying the Public Works relocation by several months should the project proceed.) On the other hand, it is difficult for the City to incur significant architect fees with respect to the renovation of a building that the City does not control at the present time. In order to resolve this situation, Opus will indemnify the City with respect to architectural fees for schematic design. 'Phis stage of the design process will take about 60 days and, if commenced now, will be concluded at about the time that Opus appears before the Council for preliminary consideration of the redevelopment plan for the existing Public Works site. If preliminary approval is granted, we anticipate that a subsequent agreement will be negotiated which addresses the balance of design services for the renovation. The attached agreement memorializes the indemnity. We recommend its approval. AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT (this "Agreement ") made this 14th day of December, 2007, by . and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation ( "City "), and OPUS NORTHWEST, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company ( "Opus "). RECITALS A. On October 12, 2007, pursuant to a Request for Proposals, Opus submitted to the City a proposal for the relocation and redevelopment of the Edina Public Works Facility. B. Opus proposes to acquire the City's existing public works facility located at 5146 Eden Avenue, Edina Minnesota ( "Existing Site ") and to subsequently redevelop the Existing Site as a medical office building. C. Opus proposes to assign to the City that certain Purchase Agreement dated as of August 2, 2007 by and between Opus, as purchaser, and ConAgra Foods Packaged Foods, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as seller, for the property located at 7450 Metro Boulevard, Edina, Minnesota ( "New Site ") for redevelopment by the City as a new public works facility. ° D. On November 20, 2007 the City designated Opus as the Developer and authorized City Staff to process necessary land use approvals and to negotiate with Opus to enter into a redevelopment agreement (the "Redevelopment Agreement ") concerning its proposal. E. Opus wants the City to proceed with preparation of schematic design plans and drawings for the redevelopment of the New Site before negotiations have been finalized, land use approvals have been obtained and the Redevelopment Agreement entered into. Opus acknowledges the negotiations may not result in an agreement and that land use approvals may not be obtained. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF THEIR MUTUAL COVENANTS THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. The City will retain an architect to prepare a schematic design, as the term is used in the AIA B141 /CMa Standard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Architect 1992ed., for the redevelopment of the New Site as a public works facility. 2. The City will pay the architect for the schematic design services set forth in Paragraph 1 above. If the City does not obtain fee title ownership of the New Site on or before August 15, 2008, Opus will reimburse the City for the actual costs incurred by the City for the services set forth in Paragraph 1 in an amount not to exceed Eighty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($80,000.00). 3. This Agreement shall automatically terminate and be of no force or effect upon execution and delivery of the Redevelopment Agreement by the parties. 13588202 RNK:r 12/ 13/2007 4. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties on the subject matter hereof, superseding any prior oral or written agreements. This Agreement can be amended only by a written instrument signed by both parties. This Agreement shall be. interpreted in accordance with Minnesota law. This Agreement is binding upon, and shall inure to the benefit of, the successors and assigns of the parties. [Signature page follows] 135882v02 RNKA2 /13/2007 CITY OF EDINA AND James B. Hovland, Mayor Gordon Hughes, City Manager 13588202 RNK:rl2/13/2007 OPUS NORTIIWEST, L.L.C. BY: Its Thomas G. Shaver vice Preswent Real Estate Development � r 250.00 UB TEMP 175215 63721987 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES R55CKREG /LOG20000 250.00 CITY OF E. 304117 12/6/2007 Council Check Register 121667 ADVANCED FIRST -AID INC. 12/6/2007 - 12/6/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 304112 1216/2007 LIFEPAK BATTERY /ELECTRODES 108757 3D SPECIALTIES MN- 11 -26 -07 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 1,108.56 SIGN POLES 00001466 175066 425927 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS 304118 1,108.56 120572 ADVANTAGE HEALTH CORPORATION 304113 1216/2007 102403 AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT FEE FOR SERVICE - HEALTH FAIR 175272 101070 1513.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS 31.99 BLACK DIRT 00001368 175267 30260 1643.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 31.99 304119 12/6/2007 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC. 304114 1216/2007 100715 ACCLAIM BENEFITS 228.58 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 175217 205.50 COBRA ADMIN 175268 002588 1551.6040 HOSPITALIZATION 228.58 636.70 FLEX SPENDING ACCT ADMIN 175269 002745 1551.6040 HOSPITALIZATION 12/6/2007 636.70 FLEX SPENDING ACCT ADMIN 175270 002948 1551.6040 HOSPITALIZATION 222.00 COBRA ADMIN 175271 003148 1551.6040 HOSPITALIZATION ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,700.90 890.00 304115 12/6/2007 304121 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 102470 AON RISK SERVICES INC. OF MN 34.60 175130 610054 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 57.64 175131 610055 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 92.24 304116 121612007 101441 ADECCO EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 125/2. :15:24 Page- 1 Business Unit STREET NAME SIGNS GENERAL TURF CARE CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL CITY HALL GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING 250.00 UB TEMP 175215 63721987 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 250.00 304117 12/6/2007 121667 ADVANCED FIRST -AID INC. 182.00 LIFEPAK BATTERY /ELECTRODES 175216 MN- 11 -26 -07 1628.6406.03 SOFTBALL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 182.18 LIFEPAK BATTERY /ELECTRODES 175216 MN- 11 -26 -07 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 364.18 304118 121612007 120572 ADVANTAGE HEALTH CORPORATION 2,316.00 FEE FOR SERVICE - HEALTH FAIR 175272 101070 1513.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 2,316.00 304119 12/6/2007 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC. 228.58 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 175217 ALERTINV09501 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 228.58 304120 12/6/2007 100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN 890.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 175038 112807 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 890.00 304121 12/6/2007 102470 AON RISK SERVICES INC. OF MN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 12/6/2007 -- 12/6/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 5,957.00 PREMIUM 175273 6100000096370 1550.6200 INSURANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 1215/2007 8:15:24 Page - 2 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL ARENA ICE MAINT COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5,957.00 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 304122 12/6/2007 YORK SELLING 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 141.96 COFFEE 175102 407503 7411.6406 141.96 304123 121612007 102012 ARMENIAN DANCE ENSEMBLE 150.00 PERFORMANCE 12/11/07 175024 112807 5610.6136 150.00 304124 12/6/2007 120451 ARMSTRONG TORSETH SKOLD & RYDE 8,423.35 ART CENTER FEASIBILITY STUDY 175317 111507 1500.6103 8,423.35 304125 121612007 120814 BAGGALLINI INC. 49.54 BAGS 00006385 175218 INC00082221 5440.5511 49.54 304126 12/6/2007 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 74.50 BATTERIES 00001549 175067 18- 193146 5840.6406 74.50 304127 1216/2007 100646 BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS 379.67 PROTECTIVE NETTING 00008035 174973 00065717 5521.6406 379.67 304128 12/612007 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 242.10 175132 42929600 5822.5512 107.10 175133 42937000 5842.5512 369.61 175134 42938000 5862.5513 18.78 175135 80157700 5862.5515 201.47 175338 80176000 5842.5515 939.06 304129 12/612007 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 402.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 175039 112807 5110.6103 402.00 304130 1216/2007 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 285.06 OFFICE SUPPLIES 175219 OE- 138286 -1 5862.6406 285.06 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1215/2007 8:15:24 Page - 2 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PSTF OCCUPANCY PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL ARENA ICE MAINT COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION VERNON SELLING r R CITY OF EL..... 1215/2, e:15:24 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 3 12/6/2007 -- 12/6/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Descrlptiori Business Unit 304131 121612007 100711 BLOOD, DAVID 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 174967 120607 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 304132 12/6/2007 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 189.52 SEALS, VALVE ASSEMBLY 00001481 174974 143951 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 49.71 FUEL ADDITIVE 00001487 174975 145547 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 27.88 SWITCH ASSEMBLY 00001551 175068 145240X1 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 68.39- CREDIT 00001058 175318 135871C 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 99.84- CREDIT 00001468 175319 140952C 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 98.88 304133 1216/2007 102398 BUDGET PROJECTOR REPAIR 60.00 REPAIRS 00009267 175069 2960 5125.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MEDIA STUDIO 60.00 304134 12/612007 117405 BUNKERT, DENISE 258.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 175040 112807 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 258.00 304135 12/6/2007 100776 BUTLER, GEORGE 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 174966 120607. 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 304136 12/612007 121674 CAMPBELL, MOLLIE 127.00 CLASS REFUND 175263 112707 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 127.00 304137 121612007 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET 88.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 175041 112807 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY 216.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 175041 112807 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 304.00 304138 1216/2007 121661 CAMPOS, DEBORAH 82.00 LESSONS REFUND - ADRIANA 174976 112607 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 82.00 304139 1216/2007 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 46.40 175136 69229 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,175.60 175137 69230 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 28.70 175138 19237 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 121612007 - 12/6/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,250.70 304140 12/6/2007 121670 CARTER, KATHLEEN 25.00 DRIVEWAY DAMAGE REPAIR 175274 113007 01340.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 1553.6530 1553.6530 1551.6186 7413.6582 7413.6186 7411.6186 1553.6584 5842.5514 REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS HEAT FUEL OIL HEAT HEAT LUBRICANTS 12/5/2007 8:15:24 Page - 4 Business Unit BA -340 TODD PARK NHOOD OTHER EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY HALL GENERAL PSTF FIRE TOWER PSTF FIRE TOWER PSTF OCCUPANCY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 5424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RANGE 25.00 304141 12/6/2007 100681 CATCO 36.69 SUCTION HOSE 00001489 175320 3 -41375 71.89 CREDIT TAKEN IN ERROR 175321 339773 108.58 304142 1216/2007 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 4,499.61 5591458 -4 174977 111907 59.05 5590919 -6 175103 11/19/07 11.05 5584310 -6 175104 11/14/07 973.16 5584304 -9 175105 NOV1407 5,542.87 304143 1216/2007 100683 CHEMSEARCH 153.63 LUBRICANT 00001512 175106 442326 153.63 304144 1216/2007 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 340.00 175139 352392 340.00 304145 12/6/2007 103040 CITY PAGES 80.66 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 175070 100223293 80.66 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 175070 100223293 80.68 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 175070 100223293 242.00 304146 12/6/2007 116304 CLAY, DON 745.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 175042 112807 745.00 304147 1216/2007 101345 COLOURS 775.84 "UNCORKED" DESIGN 175071 9875 775.84 304148 12/6/2007 120433 COMCAST 74.95 8772 15 614 0388355 175220 112307 1553.6530 1553.6530 1551.6186 7413.6582 7413.6186 7411.6186 1553.6584 5842.5514 REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS HEAT FUEL OIL HEAT HEAT LUBRICANTS 12/5/2007 8:15:24 Page - 4 Business Unit BA -340 TODD PARK NHOOD OTHER EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CITY HALL GENERAL PSTF FIRE TOWER PSTF FIRE TOWER PSTF OCCUPANCY EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 5424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RANGE 1 � CITY OF EL,...^ 12/5/2 ... 6:15:24 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page - 5 12/6/2007 -- 1216/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description - Business Unit 74.95 304149 12/6/2007 101395 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION 250.00 TRAFFIC CONTROL COURSE 175072 112707 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 250.00 - 304150 12/6/2007 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 343.67 GLOVES, EAR PLUGS 00001514 174978 03177409 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 107.53 TAPE, GLOVES 00001536 175107 03180009 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 451.20 304151 12/6/2007 100513 COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES IN 2,742.38 CUSTODIAL SERVICES 175395 7070125679 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,742.38 304152 12/6/2007 121668 CROWN PACKAGING CORP. 709.98 STORAGE FOR TARGETS 175221 615631 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 709.98 304153 12/6/2007 101275 CUSTOM/ PSC SUPPLY 285.95 ICE MELT / LIBRARY 00001371 175275 4061 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 76.25 ICE MELT / LIBRARY 00001371 175276 4108 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 362.20 304154 12/6/2007 102591 DATACARD CORPORATION 115.00 TECHNICAL SUPPORT 174979 6160819 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 115.00 304155 12/6/2007 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 1,068.05 175140 435763 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 246.00 175141 435705 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 8.80 175142 435764 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 16.90 175143 435766 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,331.10 175339 435761 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 15.95 175340 435762 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 104.00 175341 435706 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,790.80 304156 12/6/2007 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 52.41 BAKERY 175222 260988 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 33.54 BAKERY 175223 261514 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 65.95 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/5/2007 8:15:24 Council Check Register Page - 6 1216/2007 - 12/6/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 304157 1216/2007 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY 120.00 LICENSE RENEWAL - TOM EISERT 175277 060942 -PM 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 120.00 304158 12/612007 102831 DEX MEDIA EAST 18.98 175322 312846665 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 18.98 175322 312846665 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 18.99 175322 312846665 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 474.00 175323 312846610 5610.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 21.00 175324 312846554 5430.6188 TELEPHONE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 111.00 175324 312846554 5420.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER CLUB HOUSE 133.50 175324 312846554 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 796.45 304159 12/6/2007 121679 DULANY, PAT 20.00 BOILER CERTIFICATE 175278 112707 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ARENA ADMINISTRATION 20.00 304160 12/6/2007 117435 DUNCAN, PATRICIA 84.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 175043 112807 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 84.00 304161 12/6/2007 100739 EAGLE WINE 783.66 175144 693816 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 406.50 175145 690899 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 79.95 175146 691614 -5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,066.48 175147 693809 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 146.00 175342 695973 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 34.55 175343 693825 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,517.14 304162 12/612007 100740 EARL F. ANDERSEN INC. 553.80 TRASH RECEPTACLE 174980 0080272 -IN 47052.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT BRAEMAR PARK SHELTER 553.80 304163 12/612007 121669 EDM PUBLISHERS 99.00 BLDG PERMITS LAW BULLETIN 175279 093007 1495.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS INSPECTIONS 99.00 304164 12/6/2007 116448 EGAN OIL COMPANY 22,766.27 GAS 00005413 175280 143042 1553.6581 GASOLINE EQUIPMENT OPERF ,EN / 4 f R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF E, . , Council Check Register 12/6/2007 — 12/6/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 22,766.27 304165 12/6/2007 102657 ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION & MAIN 2,400.00 SAWCUT LOOP DETECTORS 00001547 174981 0009384 -IN 1330.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2,400.00 304166 12/6/2007 101956 EMERGENCY APPARATUS MAINTENANC 307.79 E -81 REPAIRS 175281 33652 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 307.79 304167 1216/2007 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 309.65 MODULE KIT 00001496 175073 1- 2748833 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 156.28 BRAKE PADS, ROTORS 00001209 175108 6- 990244 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 465.93 304168 1216/2007 100756 FEDERAL EXPRESS 13.11 SHIPPING CHARGES 175224 2- 393 -82295 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 13.11 304169 1216/2007 105420 MIKES SERVICES 37.28 AIR DEODORIZERS 175225 21726 5841.6162 SERVICES CUSTODIANS 37.28 304170 12/6/2007 116189 FILTRATION SYSTEMS INC. 652.75 RANGE FILTERS 175109 21803 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 652.75 304171 1216/2007 103039 FREY, MICHAEL 12/5/2L 6:15:24 Page - 7 Business Unit TRAFFIC SIGNALS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL YORK OCCUPANCY PSTF RANGE 3,010.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 175044 112807 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 3,010.00 304172 12/6/2007 118896 FRYKMAN, LAURA 1,019.00 INSTRUCTOR AC� 175045 112807 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,019.00 304173 12/6/2007 101867 GETSINGER, DONNA 144.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 175046 112807 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 144.00 304174 1216/2007 104652 GILLIS, LOUISE 240.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 175047 112807 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 240.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/5/2007 8:15:24 Council Check Register Page- 8 1216/2007 -- 12/6/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 304175 12/6/2007 119936 GLOBAL OAK 618.75 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 175074 447 - 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 618.75 304176 12/6/2007 120782 GOODMAN, HEATHER 240.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 175048 112807 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 240.00 304177 12/6/2007 103855 GRAHN, LEON 230.86 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 175226 112907 5410.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 230.86 304178 12/6/2007 101103 GRAINGER 186.08 WRENCHES 00001538 175075 9507538321 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 82.67 BRUSHES, PAINT 00001538 175076 9507768738 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 268.75 304179 121612007 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC 1,106.00 175344 00020238 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,106.00 304180 1216/2007 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 213.25 175148 95981 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 652.75 175345 96089 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 690.00 175346 96088 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,556.00 304181 12/612007 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 52.70 CELL PHONE CHARGES 175325 120307 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 181.03 ROLLING CART 175325 120307 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 233.73 304182 1216/2007 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 581.00 CREDIT CARD LESSONS 175227 112907 5201.4543 GOLF DOME RECEIPTS GOLF DOME REVENUES 2,086.00 CREDIT CARD LESSONS 175227 112907 5401.4602 LESSONS GOLF REVENUES 2,667.00 304183 12/6/2007 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 968.10 175149 693817 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 31.45 175150 693818 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,079.54 175151 693819 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING r k IL I R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1215/20ur 8:15:24 Council Check Register Page - 9 12/6/2007 - 12/6/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 5,096.51 175152 693828 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 115.48 175153 693827 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 104.25 175154 693823 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,239.80 175155 690897 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,916.29 175156 693813 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 4,252.74 175157 693810 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 72.80 175158 693811 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 25.04- 175159 730981 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 48.00- 175160 737739 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 88.95- 175161 738203 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,527.45 175347 695971 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,517.85 175348 693820 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 118.50 175349 695641 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 125.20 175350 695974 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 21,003.97 304184 1216/2007 100797 HAWKINS INC. 1,985.76 TONKAZORB 00001267 174982 1130915RI 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 1,985.76 304185 1216/2007 106062 HAYNES, STEPHEN 17.50 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 175049 112807 5125.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 62.50 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 175049 112807 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 80.00 304186 12/6/2007 121601 HEARTLAND DISTRIBUTION LLC 503.83 TIRES 00001207 174983 002040 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 52.19 TIRE 00001211 175110 002404 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 780.03 TIRES 00001497 175111 002398 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,336.05 304187 12/612007 117161 HENNEPIN CHIEF'S ASSOCIATION 125.00 LEGAL UPDATES 175228 112707 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 125.00 304188 1216/2007 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 3,436.50 OCT 2007 175229 002158 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES 3,436.50 304189 12/612007 106371 HENNEPIN FACULTY ASSOCIATES - 2,333.08 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 174972 120607 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,333.08 R55CKREG LOG20000 175162 437297 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 991.63 175163 436671 Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 358.45 175351 437321 1216/2007 -- 1216/2007 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 304190 12/6/2007 119154 HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES INC. 39.95 SEMINAR REGISTRATION 175282 113007 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 101426 HUGHES, GORDON 39.95 304191 12/6/2007 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 102483 HILTI INC. 120307 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 529.86 ANCHOR STUDS 00001508 174984 1604074516 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 529.86 304195 12/612007 304192 12/6/2007 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 1215/2007 8:15:24 Page- 10 Business Unit ENGINEERING GENERAL COLLECTION SYSTEMS 1,820.70 175162 437297 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 991.63 175163 436671 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 358.45 175351 437321 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 657.00 175352 437322 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING GOLF ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION YORK OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 3,827.78 304193 12/6/2007 102205 HOMBERGER, JEFF 197.39 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 175230 112907 5410.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 197.39 304194 12/612007 101426 HUGHES, GORDON 244.93 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 175283 120307 1120.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE 244.93 304195 12/612007 119857 ICMA 831.03 2008 DUES 175284 120107 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 831.03 304196 12/6/2007 121161 IDEARC MEDIA CORP 44.00 DIRECTORY AD 175077 390012545301 5841.6188 TELEPHONE 44.00 304197 12/6/2007 119808 INTEGRA TELECOM 276.39 PHONES/DATA 175112 3332909 7411.6188 TELEPHONE 408.43 PHONES 175285 3334409 1470.6188 TELEPHONE 684.82 304198 1216/2007 118322 ITL PATCH COMPANY INC. 263.00 CUSTOM EMBLEMS 174985 28740 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 263.00 304199 12/617' 100823 J & F REDDY RENTS INC. r � GOLF ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION YORK OCCUPANCY PSTF OCCUPANCY FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL L I R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EL...., 12/5/21,,. 4:15:24 Council Check Register Page - 11 12/6/2007 -- 1216/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 51.60 AIR HAMMER RENTAL 00001114 175231 03- 296868 -04 1646.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 51.60 304200 12/6/2007 101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 174971 120607 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 304201 12/6/2007 102146 JESSEN PRESS 719.83 ARBLE BROCHURE 175113 637716011 1629.6575 PRINTING ADAPTIVE RECREATION 286.77 INSPECTION REPORTS 175286 637099011 1495.6575 PRINTING INSPECTIONS 1,006.60 304202 12/6/2007 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 4,129.90 175164 1124850 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,371.35 175353 1124879 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5,501.25 304204 12/6/2007 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 479.69 175165 1357168 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 270.06 175166 1357166 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 425.48 175167 1357165 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,173.28 175168 1357170 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 228.24 175169 1357155 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 23.97- 175170 359851 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 79.90- 175171 359848 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6.67- 175172 361235 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 13.79- 175173 361234 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 25.08- 175174 360876 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 42.00- 175175 361082 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1.28- 175176 360870 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 909.64 175354 1357149 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 228.24 175355 1357148 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 143.34 175356 1357147 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 225.70 175357 1357146 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 65.08 175358 1357151 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,500.77 175359 1357150 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 563.67 175360 1357145 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1,907.28 175361 1357152 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 120.98 175362 1357160 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 76.16 175363 1357158 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 152.16 175364 1357154 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,017.51 175365 1357163 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/5/2007 8:15:24 Council Check Register Page - 12 12/6/2007 - 1216/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 4,450.44 175366 1357159 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 304.38 175367 1357153 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,704.44 175368 7357156 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 17,753.85 304205 12/6/2007 102719 JOHNSON, PHILLIP 23.89 REPLACEMENT REMOTE CONTROL 175078 112707 5125.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MEDIA STUDIO 68.23 DVDS FOR FILM TRANSFER 175078 112707 5125.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD MEDIA STUDIO 92.12 304206 12/6/2007 102341 JOHNSON, RICHARD H. 144.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 175050 112807 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 144.00 304207 12/612007 121676 JOHNSTON, SUE 344.00 LESSONS REFUND 175265 112807 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 344.00 304208 12/6/2007 103230 JOHNSTONS SALES & SERVICE 133.75 SUPPLIES 175079 031878 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 133.75 304209 12/6/2007 102603 JONAS, LENORE 98.31 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 175051 112807 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 98.31 304210 12/612007 120568 KEEHR, JERRY 79.93 PLANTER DECORATIONS 175080 112607 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 79.94 PLANTER DECORATIONS 175080 112607 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 159.87 304211 12/6/2007 121495 KIDZSMART 275.00 ACTIVITY BOOKLET 175232 32028 5610.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 275.00 ACTIVITY BOOKLET 175232 32028 5610.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 275.00 ACTIVITY BOOKLET 175232 32028 1281.6579 TRAINING AIDS TRAINING 275.00 ACTIVITY BOOKLET 175232 32028 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 275.00 ACTIVITY BOOKLET 175232 32028 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION 275.00 ACTIVITY BOOKLET 175232 32028 5310.6575 PRINTING POOL ADMINISTRATION 4,100.00 ACTIVITY BOOKLET 175232 32028 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 5,750.00 304212 r 12161' , 101340 KOCHENASH, RICK t R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EL...— 12/5/2u,,. 8:15:24 Council Check Register Page - 13 12/6/2007 -- 12/6/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,210.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 175052 112807 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,210.00 304213 12/6/2007 104979 KOCON, ED 162.96 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 175233 112907 5410.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION 162.96 304214 12/6/2007 121677 KOLAR, JANE 82.00 LESSONS REFUND 175266 112807 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 82.00 304215 12/6/2007 106094 KOUTSKY, DEAN 432.00 INSTRUCTOR 175053 112807 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 432.00 304216 12/6/2007 100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 30.90 LOGO CLOTHING 175234 06060273 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL ' 1,813.81 LOGO CLOTHING 175235 06036261 1513.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 1,844.71 304217 12/6/2007 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 106.02 SCREWS, DISCS 00001517 175081 6260638 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 256.48 TORCHES 00001555 175114 6269976 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 362.50 304218 12/6/2007 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 1,736.00 INSURANCE PREMIUM 175115 26731 7410.6200 INSURANCE PSTF ADMINISTRATION 1,736.00 304219 12/612007 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 2,525.61 DEDUCTIBLE 175287 200104706 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 2,525.61 304220 121612007 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 2,012.07 DEDUCTIBLE 175288 200104705 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 2,012.07 304221 121612007 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 56,653.00 PREMIUM 175289 12029 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 56,653.00 304222 1216/2007 121673 LEE, NANCY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/5/2007 8:15:24 Council Check Register Page - 14 12/612007 - 12/612007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 31.00 CLASS REFUND 175262 111407 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 31.00 304223 12/6/2007 118815 LITWIN, KATHY 85.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 175054 112807 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 85.00 304224 17/6/2007 121540 LUBANOVIC, THOMAS 648.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 175055 112807 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 648.00 304225 1216/2007 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 476.29 175369 27676 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,366.30 175370 27008 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,842.59 304226 12/6/2007 100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 197.24 WATER TANK HOSE 00001205 174986 2080213 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,910.61 STRIP BROOMS 00005411 174987 2080103 1310.6523 BROOMS STREET CLEANING 613.93 BROOMS 00005410 175082 2080006 1310.6523 BROOMS STREET CLEANING 1,520.82 GUTTER BROOMS 00001548 175290 2080306 1310.6523 BROOMS STREET CLEANING 4,242.60 304227 1216/2007 100868 MARK VII SALES 768.75 175177 263573 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 8.00- 175178 000504 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,617.35 175371 264051 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 58.20 175372 264052 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 2,436.30 304228 12/6/2007 100669 MARTIN - MCALLISTER 1,200.00 RETURN TO DUTY EVALUATION 175291 5517 1600.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 1,200.00 304229 12/6/2007 101146 MATRIX TELECOM INC. 236.51 174988 606517072 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 236.51 304230 12/6/2007 101928 MCKENZIE, THOMAS 43.84 UNIFORM PURCHASE 175236 112707 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL r 43.84 t t R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1215/2007 8:15:24 Council Check Register Page - 15 1216/2007 12/6/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 304231 12/6/2007 103944 MED COMPASS 13.25 HEARING TESTS 175292 11735 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 53.00 HEARING TESTS 175292 11735 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 66.20 HEARING TESTS 175292 11735 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 105.92 HEARING TESTS 175292 11735 5610.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ED ADMINISTRATION 132.50 HEARING TESTS 175292 11735 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 211.86 HEARING TESTS 175292 11735 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 490.27 HEARING TESTS 175292 11735 1301.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,073.00 304232 121612007 113023 MEGGITT DEFENSE SYSTEMS CASWEL 602.19 RANGE REPAIR PARTS 175116 066655 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 275.74 RANGE REPAIR PARTS 175117 066617 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 486.71- RETURN 175118 R01853 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 2,130.00 INSTALL RANGE UPGRADE 175119 068571 7401.8020 DONATIONS PSTF REVENUE 2,521.22 304233 12/6/2007 101483 MENARDS 11.52 SAW BLADES 00001542 175083 90221 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 30.97 CEMENT, SPACKLING 00006378 175237 90699 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 16.71- RETURN 175238 90210 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 34.32 LUMBER 00001546 175293 92292 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 60.10 304234 12/612007 101987 MENARDS 104.28 LIGHTS, CORDS 00002399 175084 47318 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 63.56 EXTENSION CORDS 00002399 175085 48606 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 45.59 LIGHTS, TARPS 00002399 175086 49315 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 213.43 304235 12/6/2007 102281 MENARDS 934.99 SNOW STAKES 00001530 175087 1927 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 934.99 304236 12/612007 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 1,200.64 POLYLINERS, CLEANERS 00008042 174989 72967 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 762.86 TISSUE, TOWELS 00001513 175088 72977 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,963.50 304237 12/6/2007 103186 MIDWEST FUELS 516.25 GASOLINE 00006252 175326 43642 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 525.00 DIESEL 00005252 175327 43643 5422.6581 GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 304239 12/6/2007 12/6/2007 - 12/6/2007 102386 MINNEAPOLIS POLICE CONCERT BAN Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,041.25 100.00 PERFORMANCE 12/9/07 175023 304238 121612007 121680 MILLER, LUISE 73.00 LUISE MILLER 62466 175294 112907 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 105.12 LUISE MILLER 62093 175294 112907 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 12/5/2007 8:15:24 Page - 16 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GOLF ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS FIRST AID SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PUBLIC HEALTH UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENF' 178.12 304239 12/6/2007 102386 MINNEAPOLIS POLICE CONCERT BAN 100.00 PERFORMANCE 12/9/07 175023 112807 5610.6136 100.00 304240 121612007 101591 MINNESOTA CERAMIC SUPPLY 11.50 CRAFT SUPPLIES 00009260 175089 22409 5110.6564 76.38 CRAFT SUPPLIES 00009260 175089 22409 5120.5510 87.88 304241 12/6/2007 108612 MINNESOTA GREEN EXPO 385.00 WORKSHOP REGISTRATION 175328 113007 5410.6104 385.00 304242 12/612007 103240 MINNESOTA SAFETY COUNCIL 725.00 GENERAL INDUSTRY COURSE 175295 144042 1120.6104 725.00 304243 12/6/2007 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 24.51 HINGE ASSEMBLY 00001208 175090 448984F6W 1553.6530 24.51 304244 12/6/2007 105175 MYRON CORP. 794.02 PENS 175296 62806245 1513.6103 794.02 304245 12/6/2007 121257 NATIONAL CREATIVE ENTERPRISES 231.05 LIFEPAKS 174990 2512 1400.6510 231.05 304246 12/6/2007 101472 NEHA 190.00 MEMBERSHIP- ENGELMAN, WILMOT 175239 2245,63738 1490.6105 190.00 304247 12/612007 103007 NELSON, DAVID s , 89.97 UNIFORM PURCHASE 175240 112707 1400.6203 12/5/2007 8:15:24 Page - 16 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GOLF ADMINISTRATION CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS FIRST AID SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PUBLIC HEALTH UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENF' t � R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF E�...A 12/5/20ur 8:15:24 Council Check Register Page - 17 12/6/2007 -- 12/6/2007 Check # Dale Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 89.97 304248 12/6/2007 121683 NELSON, JESSICA 30.00 TOBACCO DECOY 175329 120107 1413.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TOBACCO ENFORCEMENT 30.00 304249 17/6/2007 106334 NELSON, PEGGY 594.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 175056 112807 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 594.00 304250 12/6/2007 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 162.50 175179 46527 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,500.00 175373 46532 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,662.50 304251 12/6/2007 101958 NICOL, JANET 415.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 175057 112807 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 415.00 304252 12/6/2007 100724 NISSEN, DICK 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 174970 120607 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 304253 12/6/2007 100712 NORTHERN WATER WORKS SUPPLY 330.15 METROCLAMP 00001521 174991 501121343.001 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 330.15 304254 1216/2007 100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO. 281.16 TIRES 00001428 175120 NW- 110369 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 91.60 SCRAP TIRE DISPOSAL 00001428 175121 NW- 110336 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 372.76 304255 12/6/2007 121551 NYNGAR, BATBAATAR 430.00 CLEANING /MAINTENANCE 175058 112807 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 430.00 304256 12/6/2007 116114 OCE 162.08 OCT MAINTENANCE 175297 986164996 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 162.08 304257 1216/2007 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 87.24 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009527 175091 408620701 -001 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1215/2007 8:15:24 Council Check Register Page - 18 1216/2007 -- 1216/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 52.04 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00006034 175241 409361575 -001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 139.28 304258 1216/2007 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 675.86 EYES & HOOKS 00001288 174992 476730 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 303.58 CABLE, WIRE ROPE 00001515 174993 476752 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 69.14 HITCH PINS, FLASHLIGHT 00001535 175122 477372 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,048.58 304259 121612007 118891 OLSON, LYNN 70.92 UNIFORM PURCHASE 175242 112907 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 70.92 304260 12/6/2007 101484 OSWALD HOSE & ADAPTERS 555.93 FLOODING HOSES 00001358 175243 103819 1648.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE 555.93 304261 12/6/2007 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 947.50 SERVICE CONTRACT 00006384 175244 17634 5210.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF DOME PROGRAM 947.50 304262 12/612007 117993 P & H SERVICES 33.60 REMOTE CONTROL 174994 12302 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 33.60 304263 12/6/2007 103624 P & L AUTOMOTIVE INC. 125.00 COMPLETE CAR CLEAN UP 00001553 175123 177897 1553.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 125.00 304264 1216/2007 102440 PASS, GRACE 216.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 175059 112607 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 832.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 175059 112807 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY 1,048.00 304265 1216/2007 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 932.67 175180 8166889 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 604.00 175181 8166288 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 438.00 175182 8166888 -IN 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 73.50 175183 8166256 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 377.00 175184 8166896 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 486.00 175185 8167164 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING r , 29.99 175186 8167011 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF Ems..... Council Check Register 12/6/2007 -- 12/612007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 340.00 175374 8167163 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 690.00 175375 8165833 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 304266 12/6/2007 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 121666 PEARSON BROS. INC. COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 8,770.54 SEAL COATING 00005900 175124 1626 1314.6180 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 8,770.54 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 304267 12/612007 YORK SELLING 100743 PHILLIPS WINE 8 SPIRITS 1,215.87 175187 2541845 5862.5513 4,442.34 175188 2541843 5862.5513 98.16 175189 2541844 5862.5515 162.86 175190 2541846 5862.5512 4.66- 175191 3373145 5822.5513 23.33- 175192 3373144 5822.5513 725.61 175376 2541837 5822.5513 37.08 175377 2541836 5822.5515 194.69 175378 2541838 5822.5512 2,044.43 175379 2541835 5822.5513 1,080.91 175380 2541841 5842.5512 37.08 175381 2541840 5842.5515 10,011.04 304268 1216/2007 121413 PIERSON, CLARA 1,186.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 175298 112907 1470.4329 1,186.00 304269 12/6/2007 111340 POLAR CHEVROLET 27,182.00 2008 SILVERADO PICKUP 00003840 175299 8F117241 1470.6710 27,182.00 304270 1216/2007 101110 POLLY NORMAN PHOTOGRAPHY 50.00 ABOUT TOWN PHOTO 175092 102707 2210.6408 50.00 304271 12/6/2007 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 123.00 MAILING STAMPS 175060 112807 5110.6803 123.00 304272 12/6/2007 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 780.04 175193 693812 5862.5513 596.39 175194 693815 5822.5513 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 12/5/2u- 8:15:24 Page - 19 Business Unit YORK SELLING YORK SELLING STREET RENOVATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/5/2007 8:15:24 Council Check Register Page - 20 12/6/2007 - 1216/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 560.60 175382 693821 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,937.03 304273 1216/2007 120768 PRO -POWER CORDS INC. 30.15 TROUBLE LIGHTS 00001545 174995 1344 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING 30.15 304274 12/6/2007 121662 PULRANG, LISA 92.00 LESSONS REFUND - JACKSON 174996 112607 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 92.00 304275 1216/2007 100971 QUALITY WINE 1,071.57 175195 939077 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 191.78 175196 938868 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 318.45 175197 939218 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4,580.46 175198 939076 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 452.30 175199 938984 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,572.47 175200 939170 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,907.63 175201 939217 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 81.15 175202 939262 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 50.15 175203 938866 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 928.50 175383 938321 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 13,154.46 304276 12/6/2007 101965 QWEST 112.58 952 920 -8166 175093 8166 -11107 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 39.54 952 922 -9246 175330 9246 -11107 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 122.43 952 927 -8861 175331 8861 -11/07 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 78.40 952 929 -9549 175332 9549 -11/07 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 58.14 952 929 -0297 175333 0297 -11/07 4090.6188 TELEPHONE STREET REVOLVING 411.09 304277 12/6/2007 117692 R & B CLEANING INC. 937.20 STAIRWELL RAMP CLEANING 00001552 175094 216 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 937.20 304278 12/6/2007 100972 R&R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN I 760.20 ZAMBONI REPAIRS 00008047 174997 29211 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 760.20 304279 '1216/2007 100974 RAYMOND HAEG PLUMBING r , 351.15 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 00001375 175300 111607 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTEV R55CKREG LUu20000 82.00 CITY OF L Council Check Register 304282 12/6/2007 -- 12/6/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 351.15 304280 12/6/2007 2,900.00 105324 READY WATT ELECTRIC 174999 48139 520.00 SET POLE AT BRAEMAR 00001352 175245 93307 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 520.00 2,900.00 304281 1216/2007 121660 RICE, MOLLY 1215/2u... 8:15:24 Page - 21 Business Unit TREES 8 MAINTENANCE 82.00 LESSONS REFUND -ALEX 174998 112607 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA ICE MAINT PLAYGROUND & THEATER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA ADMINISTRATION COLLECTION SYSTEMS SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER POTTERY 82.00 304282 1216/2007 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 2,900.00 REPAIRED WATER STORAGE TANKS0008043 174999 48139 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2,900.00 304283 12/6/2007 121671 RICHFIELD RECREATION SERVICES 100.00 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 175301 112707 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 100.00 304284 12/6/2007 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 398.88 SOFTENER SALT 00008046 175000 00200423 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 398.88 304285 12/6/2007 121678 SAABYE, PETER 20.00 BOILER CERTIFICATE' 175302 112707 5510.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 20.00 304286 1216/2007 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 69.30 LUMBER 00001435 175001 40561743 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 57.05 LUMBER 00001351 175002 40566356 1648.6577 LUMBER 318.22 LUMBER 00001365 175003 40561830 1648.6577 LUMBER 114.11 LUMBER 00001561 175246 40568715 1646.6577 LUMBER 50.41 LUMBER 00001357 175247 40567964 1646.6577 LUMBER 87.12 NAILS, LUMBER 00001357 175248 40567965 1646.6577 LUMBER 66.72 LUMBER 00001363 175249 40569147 1646.6577 LUMBER 47.46 LUMBER 00001520 175303 40567747 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 810.39 304287 12/6/2007 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 1,748.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 175061 112807 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,748.00 304288 12/6/2007 100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. ARENA ICE MAINT PLAYGROUND & THEATER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA ADMINISTRATION COLLECTION SYSTEMS SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER POTTERY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1215/2007 8:15:24 Council Check Register Page - 22 12/6/2007 — 12/6/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 598.36 PAINT, PUMP REPAIR KIT 00001439 175095 7658 -1 1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 598.36 304289 12/6/2007 101000 SIR SPEEDY 172.17 MAILING LABELS 175250 55777 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 172.17 304290 12/6/2007 103460 SNAP -ON TOOLS 846.68 COMPUTER UPGRADE 00001298 175125 215311208 -16222 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 9 846.68 304291 1216/2007 110977 SOW, ADAMA 357.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 175062 112807 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,060.00 CLEANING 175062 112807 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 1,417.00 304292 1216/2007 102036 SPRINGSTED INC. 1,125.00 PREP OF REPORT AND REVIEW 175304 2 1120.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 1,125.00 304293 1216/2007 116856 SPRINT 338.32 175305 NOV1507 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 908.40 175334 NOV /2007 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,246.72 304294 1216/2007 103265 STAN MORGAN & ASSOCIATES INC 9,372.00 OPEN FACE WINE CHILLER 00004062 175335 54836 5800.1740 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT LIQUOR BALANCE SHEET 9,372.00 304295 12/612007 116631 STELLAR ENERGY SERVICES INC. 240.68 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE 175306 070914 -068 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 240.68 , 304296 12/6/2007 106452 STONE, HOLLY 1,200.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 175063 112807 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,200.00 304297 1216/2007 101015 STREICHERS 165.98 STROBE TUBES 00001485 175096 1474669 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 18.09 SOLVENT, PATCHES 175126 1473502 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 394.04 SQUAD EQUIP INSTALLATION 175251 1474666 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GEN' R55CKREG LOu20000 CITY OF L. 1215/2c_. 8:15:24 Council Check Register Page - 23 12/612007 - 121612007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 578.11 304298 12/6/2007 121681 SUMMIT CONSULTING 324.70 FIRE SPRINKLER CONSULTING 175307 12481548 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 324.70 304299 1216/2007 121675 SUND, MICHELLE 127.00 CLASS REFUND 175264 112707 5101.4607 CLASS REGISTRATION ART CENTER REVENUES 127.00 304300 1216/2007 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 401.00 175204 462214 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 615.00 175205 462216 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 398.00 175384 462215 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,414.00 304301 121612007 100794 SWANSON, HAROLD 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 174969 120607 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 304302 12/6/2007 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 37.00 BEERLINE CLEANING 175252 275896 5421.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GRILL 37.00 304303 121612007 101027 TARGET 50.65 ACCT 9 -555- 029 -840 175253 111807 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 50.65 304304 12/6/2007 102300 TCALMC 300.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 175308 2008 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 300.00 304305 12/6/2007 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 310.68 CONNECTORS, SWITCHES, FUSES 00001476 175004 46137 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 310.68 304306 12/612007 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 3,465.05 175206 469849 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,372.65 175385 470892 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 49.15 175386 470891 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 8,886.85 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 12/6/2007 -- 12/612007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 304307 12/6/2007 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 116.42 CUTTING TORCH SUPPLIES 00001356 175254 195117 1646.6556 TOOLS 116.42 304308 1216/2007 118704 TOWNSHEND, SCHUYLER 318.44 HEADPHONES 175005 112707 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 318.44 304309 12/612007 116302 TRI - ANIM HEALTH SERVICES INC 987.10 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003859 175309 MMH73166308 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 75.92- CREDIT 175310 MMH73171231 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 911.18 304310 12/6/2007 116411 TRINITY MEDICAL SOLUTIONS INC. 567.62 UNIFORM SHIRTS 00002398 175006 9361 - 5630.6201 LAUNDRY 567.62 304311 12/6/2007 102692 UNITED HEALTH CARE 815.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 175311 LUISE MILLER 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 650.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 175312 MILLER, LUISE 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES 1,465.00 304312 12/_612007 103500 VALLEY PAVING INC. 21,754.05 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 175313 113007 01234.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 35,094.95 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 175313 113007 01233.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 39,724.68 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO.2 175313 113007 01231.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 44,221.41 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 175313 113007 01232.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 60,769.17 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 2 175313 113007 01230.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 201,564.26 304313 1216/2007 101338 VALLIERE, JOHN 73.90 COPIES 175255 112907 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 73.90 304314 1216/2007 120620 VALLONE, AMANDA 12/5/2007 8:15:24 Page - 24 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE COMMUNICATIONS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CENTENNIAL LAKES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL A -234 50th STREET M &O A -233 HALIFAX M &O A -231 W 49 1/2 ST M &O A -232 W 51 ST ST M &O A -230 LINCOLN DR M &O CLUB HOUSE 285.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 175064 112807 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 285.00 304315 121612007 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 16.78 WAREHOUSE GLOVES 00007512 175007 058685-02 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 409.59 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 175008 060500 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 103.36 CAN LINERS, BOWL CLEANER 00009258 175097 060033 -01 5111.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG' 'T f CITY OF L. 12/5/2t, _ d:15:24 R55CKREG LOG20000 Council Check Register Page- 25 1216/2007 - 12/6/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 421.47 TISSUE, TOWELS, LINERS 00001364 175256 061533 -00 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 951.20 304316 12/6/2007 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 64.00 SPRING SET 00001297 175098 34749 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 64.00 304317 12/6/2007 102004 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COM 1,242.45 REPLACE SPRINKLER HEADS 00005571 175099 121897 5841.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE YORK OCCUPANCY 1,242.45 304318 121612007 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 44.13 SAFETY GLASSES 00005955 175127 210106 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 44.13 304319 1216/2007 121611 VON BARGEN, AMY 126.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 175065 112807 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 126.00 304320 1216/2007 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 20.21 LIGHTING 00001526 175100 15090817 -00 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 19.38 LIGHTING 00001526 175314 15090746 -00 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 35.53 LIGHTING 00001526 175314 15090746 -00 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 101.60 LIGHTING 00001526 175314 15090746 -00 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 176.72 304321 12/612007 101328 WALBRIDGE, DAVID 150.00 PERFORMANCE 12/13107 175025 112807 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 304322 12/6/2007 101080 WALSH, WILLIAM 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 174968 120607 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 304323 12/6/2007 100183 WASHINGTON COUNTY 200.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 175257 112307 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 200.00 304324 12/612007 101944 WATERSTREET, JOAN M 103.80 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 175336 113007 1400.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 103.80 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/5/2007 8:15:24 Council Check Register Page - 26 1216/2007 - 1216/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 304325 1216/2007 103266 WELSH COMPANIES LLC 545.58 DEC 2007 MAINTENANCE 175009 120107 5841.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES YORK OCCUPANCY 545.58 304326 1216/2007 121672 WENNEN, HEIDI 82.00 LESSONS REFUND 175315 113007 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 82.00 304327 1216/2007 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 436.05 175207 180487 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 598.90 175208 181038 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 68.00- 175209 180669 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,795.64 175387 181039 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6,762.59 304328 12/6/2007 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 736.26 175210 212829 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 646.98 175388 212828 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 95.08 175389 212826 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,146.67 175390 212825 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,624.99 304329 12/6/2007 121682 WMCA 100.00 REGION VI SESSION REGISTRATION 175316 113007 1180.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ELECTION 100.00 304330 12/6/2007 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 894.00 175211 203365 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 320.00 175391 202738 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 566.00 175392 203444 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 606.00 175393 203489 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,089.47 175394 203276 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,475.47 304331 12/6/2007 121664 WYANT, JOHN 172.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 175101 ART CENTER 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 172.00 304332 12/612007 101726 XCEL ENERGY 29.62 51- 6892224 -5 175010 133250765 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 19.50 51- 6541084 -2 175011 133242476 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,256.78 51- 6223269 -1 175012 133099295 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGr I R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDIN- Council Check Register 12/6/2007 -- 1216/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 1,048.16 51- 5107681 -4 175013 133073533 5111.6185 223.03 51- 5005454 -3 175014 133072151 5913.6185 5,835.83 51- 6955679 -8 175015 133566515 1551.6185 57.60 51- 6692497 -0 175016 133563772 1460.6185 56.05 51- 4420190 -3 175017 133368845 1321.6185 1,618.28 51- 5547446 -1 175018 133392939 1628.6185 8.52 51- 6050184 -2 175019 133232122 4086.6103 1,732.18 51- 4159265 -8 175128 133196334 7411.6185 34.55 51- 8102668 -0 175258 133656667 1321.6185 134.41 51- 6229265 -9 175259 133637310 1481.6185 107.35 51- 4827232 -6 175260 133614386 5311.6185 30,340.73 51-4621797 -2 175261 133614862 1321.6185 1,024.05 51- 5847121 -5 175337 134091878 5914.6185 43,526.64 304333 121612007 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 28.66 OCT USAGE - BLDG /ENG 00004322 175020 028642473 1550.6406 137.85 OCT USAGE - PARK & REC 00004322 175021 028642474 1550.6406 166.51 304334 1216/2007 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 84.78 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 00008052 175022 54062548 69.26 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 175129 54062547 154.04 620,375.49 Grand Total 5510.6610 7411.6406 Subledger Account Description LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT &.POWER LIGHT & POWER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER LIGHT & POWER Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 620,375.49 Total Payments 620,375.49 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES 12/5/2007 8:15:24 Page - 27 Business Unit ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT DISTRIBUTION CITY HALL GENERAL CIVILIAN DEFENSE STREET LIGHTING REGULAR SENIOR CITIZENS AQUATIC WEEDS PSTF OCCUPANCY STREET LIGHTING REGULAR YORK FIRE STATION POOL OPERATION STREET LIGHTING REGULAR TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ARENA ADMINISTRATION PSTF OCCUPANCY R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 12/6/2007 - 12/6/2007 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 229,668.72 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 6,206.61 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 202,239.87 05100 ART CENTER FUND 19,355.OT 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 2,785.28 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 382.35 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 5,031.66 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 6,714.67 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 2,310.97 05800 LIQUOR FUND 131,809.92 05900 UTILITY FUND 4,969.28 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 8,901.09 Report Totals 620,375.49 We con}Irm to the best of ow bwwbdge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing polices nd �d pr�ocedurel4ge Y ager 1215/2007 8:17:09 Page - 1 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF --,,4A 12/1214u07 8:30:45 Council Check Register Page - 1 12113/2007 —12/13/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 304335 12113/2007 101833 A.T.O.M. 350.00 LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING 00003058 175552 9890624 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 350.00 304336 12/1312007 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 62.12 175452 0606007 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 65.64 175780 610056 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 67.64 175781 0606009 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 195.40 304337 12113/2007 100616 ACTION MAILING SERVICES INC. 446.14 MAIL PROCESSING 175716 207749 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 446.14 - 304338 12113/2007 101441 ADECCO EMPLOYMENT SERVICES 610.00 UB TEMP 175536 63736357 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 610.00 394339 12/13/2007 102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES 373.21 READY MIX 00005917 175499 4205637 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 373.21 304340 12/13/2007 116355 ALIGNEX INC. 500.00 SOFTWARE INSTALLATION 175663 6526 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 500.00 304341 12/13/2007 100575 ALL SAFE INC. 1,298.62 EXTINGUISHER MAINTENANCE 00001558 175664 81755 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,298.62 304342 12/13/2007 100058 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 33,958.00 RECYCLING 175534 0894 -001160409 5952.6183 RECYCLING CHARGES RECYCLING 33,958.00 304343 12/13/2007 103357 ALPHA VIDEO & AUDIO INC. 266.25 MINI DVDS 175396 INV72836 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 266.25 304344 12/13/2007 103957 AMERICAN VAN EQUIPMENT INC. 330.43 COMPUTER STAND 00001212 175500 350591 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 330.43 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OFEDINA 12/12/2007 8:30:45 Council Check Register Page - 2 12/13/2007 -- 12/13/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 304345 12113/2007 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 911.70 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 175717 23659 01336.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA336 W70TH - FRANCE TO YORK 3,840.00 INSTALL IRRIGATION SYSTEM 175718 23660 01336.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA336 W70TH - FRANCE TO YORK 14,288.00 INSTALL IRRIGATION SYSTEM 175719 23661 01336.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA336 W70TH - FRANCE TO YORK 168.81 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 175720 23656 01336.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA336 W70TH - FRANCE TO YORK 1,037.60 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 175721 23657 01336.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA336 W70TH - FRANCE TO YORK 596.67 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 175722 23658 01336.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA336 W70TH - FRANCE TO YORK 20,842.78 304346 12/13/2007 103680 ARAMARK.REFRESHMENT SRVCS 141.78 COFFEE 175397 407502 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 141.78 304347 12113/2007 100634 ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO. 92.12 PIN 00001493 175398 10030178 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 92.12 304348 12/13/2007 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 33.95 175537 120207 5821.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 40.27 175537 120207 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 46.93 175537 120207 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 59.67 175537 120207 5210.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GOLF DOME PROGRAM 69.22 175537 120207 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 74.22 175537 120207 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL VERNON OCCUPANCY 85.73 175537 120207 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL LITTER REMOVAL 88.81 175537 120207 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL SENIOR CITIZENS 92.47 175537 120207 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK FIRE STATION 174.28 175537 120207 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL YORK OCCUPANCY 209.29 175537 120207 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE 215.01 175537 120207 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CITY HALL GENERAL 254.07 175537 120207 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 254.08 175537 120207 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 334.14 175537 120207 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 472.54 175537 120207 5620.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL EDINBOROUGH PARK 156.56 175665 DECO207 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 2,661.24 304349 12/13/2007 104345 BARCLAY AUDIO 963.88 REPLACE AMPLIFIER 00002228 175723 111207 5620.6530 REPAIR PARTS EDINBOROUGH PARK 963.88 304350 12/1' 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. R55CKREG LOG2000 Check # Date 0 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. CITY OF __.,JA 400.00 Council Check Register 175671 131015 7410.6103 12/1312007 -- 12/1312007 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 360.00 SANITARY SEWER MODELING 175666 2327G13 -25 5923.6136 9,443.00 NONDEGRADATION ASSESSMENT • 175667 23271-105 -3 5913.6103 4,714.05 MANHOLE INSPECTIONS 175668 2327G96 -6 5923.6136 5,096.50 SANITARY SEWER COMP PLAN 175669 23271-106 -4 5923.6136 3,397.32 SURFACE WATER MGMT -COMP PLAN 175670 2327354 -155 5913.6103 23,010.87 304351 12/13/2007 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 103.52 BATTERIES 103.52 304352 12113/2007 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 2,762.70 2,625.40 59.30 130.20 727.60 2.37- 708.00 97.10 870.20 991.20 4.90 84.97 248.71 9,307.91 00003063 175553 18- 193793 175453 42937100 175454 42937900 175455 80188400 175456 42968700 175457 42968600 175458. 80173100 175594 42255200 175595 43010700 175782 43033500 175783 42255400 175784 80205000 175784 80205000 175785 80175800 1400.6406 5842.5513 5842.5513 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5513 5842.5515 5862.5513 5862.5513 5842.5513 5842.5513 5860.6406 5862.5515 5862.5515 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 12/1-07 8:30:45 Page - 3 Business Unit COLLECTION SYSTEMS DISTRIBUTION COLLECTION SYSTEMS COLLECTION SYSTEMS DISTRIBUTION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 304353 12/13/2007 117379 BENIEK PROPERTY SERVICES INC. 400.00 SNOW REMOVAL 175671 131015 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 400.00 304354 12/13/2007 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 220.00 CREDIT TAKEN IN ERROR 175672 BAL DUE 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 220.00 304355 12/13/2007 100663 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 14.92 PETTY CASH 175724 120707 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 14.98 PETTY CASH 175724 120707 5422.6275 COURSE BEAUTIFICATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 20.00 PETTY CASH 175724 120707 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 32.68 PETTY CASH 175724 120707 5410.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GOLF ADMINISTRATION , 37.25 PETTY CASH 175724 120707 5210.6590 RANGE BALLS GOLF DOME PROGRAM 41.00 PETTY CASH 175724 120707 5410.6235 POSTAGE GOLF ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 YORK SELLING 312.04 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 304356 12/13/2007 Council Check Register 100873 BROCKWAY, MAUREEN 12/13/2007 -12/13/2007 504.00 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 42.65 PETTY CASH 175724 120707 5210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50.00 PETTY CASH 175724 120707 5401.4553 CLUBHOUSE 58.56 PETTY CASH 175724 120707 5210.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 5110.6103 5842.6575 12/1212007 8:30:45 Page- 4 Business Unit GOLF DOME PROGRAM GOLF REVENUES GOLF DOME PROGRAM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PRINTING YORK SELLING 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5842.5514 5842.5515 5842.5514 5822.5514 5822.5515 1600.4390.15 5842.5513 5822.5513 1400.6160 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 312.04 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 304356 12/13/2007 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 100873 BROCKWAY, MAUREEN 504.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 175725 120607 504.00 304357 12/13/2007 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 463.28 LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 175399 12416 463.28 304358 12/13/2007 108605 CABIDDU, GEORGETTE 1,197.00 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 175726 120707 1,197.00 304359 1211312007 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 372.30 GOLF CLUB 175554 913764980 372.30 304360 12/13/2007 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 2,298.10 175459 19238 75.10 175596 19297 2,572.20 175597 19299 331.40 175786 69297 37.55 175787 69296 5,314.35 304361 12/13/2007 121700 CARLSON, CHERYL 5.00 OVERPAID FOR PRESENTS 175538 120507 5.00 304362 12/1312007 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 212.00 175598 49603 157.91 175788 49791 369.91 304363 12/13/2007 102372 COW GOVERNMENT INC. 100.02 CD BURNING SOFTWARE 00004493 175727 HPZ7557 100.02 5110.6103 5842.6575 12/1212007 8:30:45 Page- 4 Business Unit GOLF DOME PROGRAM GOLF REVENUES GOLF DOME PROGRAM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PRINTING YORK SELLING 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5842.5514 5842.5515 5842.5514 5822.5514 5822.5515 1600.4390.15 5842.5513 5822.5513 1400.6160 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF __.,JA 12/11iuc07 8:30:45 Council Check Register Page - 5 12113/2007 — 12/13/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 304364 12113/2007 103079 CEDAR SMALL ENGINE 2,640.14 MOWER 00005409 175767 8114 1305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 2,640.14 304365 12113/2007 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 225.57 175789 352722 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 225.57 304366 12/13/2007 101663 CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF 60.00 DUES - WAYNE HOULE 175728 120707 1260.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ENGINEERING GENERAL 60.00 304367 12/13/2007 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 8,299.07 4TH QTR LABORATORY SERVICES 175400 2007 5915.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER WATER TREATMENT 8,299.07 304368 12113/2007 114639 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 23,055.28 SANITARY SEWER STATION 175760 112707 5923.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS COLLECTION SYSTEMS 23,055.28 304369 12113/2007 105693 CITYSPRINT 20.39 COURIER 175673 8870 1180.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ELECTION 150.52 COURIER 175673 8870 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 170.91 304370 12/13/2007 120433 COMCAST 61.74 8772 15 614 0387019 175555 112507 5430.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 61.74 8772 15 614 0406553 175556 NOV2507 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 123.48 304371 12/13/2007 121706 COMMERS, DANIEL 607.36 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 175729 120707 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 607.36 304372 12/13/2007 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 41.43 SAFETY GLASSES 00001560 175401 03184053 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 41.43 304373 12/13/2007 119839 CORNEJO CONSULTING 9,400.00 COMP PLAN CONSULTING 175402 120107 1140.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PLANNING 9,400.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/12/2007 8:30:45 Council Check Register Page - 6 12/1312007 —12/13/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 304374 12/13/2007 102285 DAVANNIS 69.42 OSSI TRAINING 175557 182066 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 69.42 304375 12/1312007 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 1,650.99 175460 435765 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 36.70 175599 436630 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,602.45 175600 436629 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 8.80 175790 436628 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,419.95 175791 436627 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5,718.89 304376 1211312007 121529 DEXHEIMER, HEATHER 77.00 LESSONS REFUND 175501 120507 5511.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 77.00 304377 12113/2007 100571 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS 349.32 KITS, VALVES 00001414 175674 802098331 1335.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PAVEMENT MARKINGS 349.32 304378 12113/2007 100730 DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 1,045.00 LEGAL 175502 1445340 1195.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES 1,045.00 304379 12/13/2007 100731 DPC INDUSTRIES 1,782.02 CHEMICALS 00005905 175503 82702071 -07 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 1,782.02 304380 12113/2007 121439 E GROUP INC. 1,134.81 T- SHIRTS 175730 5120781 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,134.81 304381 12/1312007 100739 EAGLE WINE 2,269.20 175461 693824 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 162.00 175462 695972 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,318.76 175601 698613 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 656.81 175602 698616 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 34.55 175603 698619 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,458.72 175792 698620 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8,900.04 304382 12117 106340 EDINA CAR WASH R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY Or _ ..JA 12/1 —W7 8:30:45 Council Check Register Page - 7 12113/2007 -- 12/13/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 149.10 NOV WASHES 175558 3186 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 149.10 304383 12/13/2007 105467 EDINA CRIME PREVENTION FUND 100.00 BRAEMAR GC CONTRIBUTION 175731 120107 5400.2072 MEN'S CLUB GOLF BALANCE SHEET 100.00 304384 12113/2007 118010 EGAN, BILL 224.70 MUSKRAT REMOVAL 175403 112607 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 224.70 304385 12113/2007 102865 ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE IN 4,863.12 BALLOTS 175404 656372 1180.6575 PRINTING ELECTION 4,863.12 304386 12/13/2007 106194 EMA INC. 1,500.00 SCADA UPGRADES 175504 5604 - 90012492 05456.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN WMA56 LAKE CORNELIA N /HOOD 1,500.00 304387 12/13/2007 102309 EMBEDDED SYSTEMS INC. 2,277.00 SIREN MAINTENANCE 175559 31781 1460.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CIVILIAN DEFENSE 2,277.00 304388 12/13/2007 100018 EXPERT T BILLING 4,905.30 NOV TRANSPORTS 175560 120407 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 4,905.30 304389 12/13/2007 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 64.00 175793 622824 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 64.00 304390 12/13/2007 120831 FIRST SCRIBE INC. 425.00 ROWAY 175675 14617 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 425.00 ROWAY 175676 14765 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 850.00 304391 12/13/2007 121704 FISCHER, CHRIS 45.00 ADMISSION REFUND 175732 120507 5601.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS EB /CL REVENUES 45.00 304392 12/13/2007 102727 FORCE AMERICA 454.7.1 BOLTS 00001498 175405 01290706 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/12/2007 8:30:45 Council Check Register Page - 8 12/13/2007 -- 12113/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 454.71 304393 12/13/2007 100760 FOWLER ELECTRIC 14.08 FILTERS, PLUG WIRE ENDS 00001495 175677 64371600 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 14.08 304394 12113/2007 120733 FRAHM, JEFF 51.90 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 175733 120307 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL 51.90 304395 12/13/2007 100457 FRASIER, SCOTT 150.00 PERFORMANCE 12/23107 175592 120107 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 304396 12/13/2007 115314 GALAXY COMPUTER INC. 250.00 CH /PD PRINTER SUPPLIES 175768 2940 1554.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS 250.00 304397 12/13/2007 114697 GOPHER STRIPING CO. 500:00 RESTRIPE LOT AT 50TH & FRANCE 00001463 175406 07160 1335.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PAVEMENT MARKINGS 800.00 RESTRIPE LOTS AT CITY HALL 00001463 175407 07161 1335.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PAVEMENT MARKINGS 1,300.00 304398 12/13/2007 120929 GOVCONNECTION INC. 74.06 CORDLESS MOUSE 00004489 175678 42712582 1550.6121 ADVERTISING PERSONNEL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 74.06 304399 12/13/2007 119771 GRAHAM PENN -CO CONSTRUCTION IN 10,621.37 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 12 175734 120707 05425.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PLANT #2 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST 10,621.37 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 12 175734 120707 05426.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PLANT #4 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST 10,621.38 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 12 175734 120707 05427.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS PLANT #3 BACKWASH RECYCLE SYST 31,864.12 304400 12/13/2007 101103 GRAINGER 63.18 SEALANT TAPE, GREASE 00001561 175408 9512875635 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 13.42 BATTERIES 00001564 175409 9512875643 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 69.02 FUSES, LADDER 00001562 175505 9512641383 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 183.80 FUSES, LADDER 00001562 175505 9512641383 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 333.76 FUSES, LADDER 00001562 175505 9512641383 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 13.81 BATTERY 00001550 175506 9511323926 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 38.62 RECEPTACLE 00001550 175506 9511323926 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 715.61 R55CKREG LOG20000 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CITY OF __.AA VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR Council Check Register COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 12/13/2007 -12/13/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 304401 12/13/2007 YORK SELLING 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 329.50 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 175604 96226 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 1,210.75 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 175794 96273 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,540.25 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 304402 12/13/2007 50TH ST SELLING 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 656.00 LUGHT BULBS 00002215 175735 930470179 5620.6406 656.00 304403 12/13/2007 101350 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 468.89 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 175679 075271 01331.1705.30 419.29 IRRIGATION REPAIRS 175680 075259 01340.1705.30 888.18 304405 12/13/2007 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 10,960.79 175463 693826 5842.5512 3,151.36 175464 693822 5842.5513 66.68 175465 695969 5862.5512 118.50 175466 695642 5862.5512 11,127.78 175467 693814 5862.5512 271.53 175468 695640 5822.5512 4,391.76 175605 698614 5862.5513 1,818.85 175606 698617 5822.5513 479.60 175607 699108 5862.5513 218.84 175608 698539 5862.5512 5,565.04 175609 698541 5862.5512 75.95- 175610 738622 5842.5513 1.05 175795 698279 5842.5512 4,361.05 175796 696824 5842.5512 240.71 175797 698535 5842.5515 11,665.63 175798 698536 5842.5512 30.00 175799 698540 5862.5515 121.63 175800 695970 5862.5515 4,231.20 175801 698538 5842.5512 340.93 175802 698534 5822.5512 3,228.15 175803 698621 5842.5513 40.25- 175804 739088 5842.5513 34.35- 175805 738966 5842.5513 251.68- 175806 738982 5822.5512 61,988.85 Subledger Account Description COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 112/1-07 8:30:45 Page - 9 Business Unit VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING EDINBOROUGH PARK BA -331 CONCORD: VALLEY VIEW BA -340 TODD PARK NHOOD OTHER COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 304411 12/13/2007 101073 HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES INC. Council Check Register 2,662.50 MESSAGE BOARD RENTAL 00005403 175410 12/13/2007 -- 12/13/2007 1301.6151 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 304406 12/13/2007 100786 GROTH MUSIC 304412 12/13/2007 33.05 SHEET MUSIC 00002005 175681 1343401 5610.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 174.04 33.05 175736 2325587 5620.6530 304407 12/13/2007 SOAP 00002235 104482 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 2324895 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 290.57 485.00 INSTALL GFI RECEPTACLE 00001518 175682 7- 11 -16 -1 5920.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 304413 12/13/2007 485.00 304408 12/13/2007 106431 HALL, MARY 437912 5842.5514 12/12/2007 8:30:45 Page - 10 Business Unit ED ADMINISTRATION SEWER CLEANING 150.00 PERFORMANCE 12/27/07 175593 120107 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 304409 12/13/2007 100797 HAWKINS INC. 1,985.76 TONKAZORB 00001665 175561 1133017 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 1,715.72- CREDIT 175562 1131804 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 270.04 304410 12/13/2007 100802 HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 1,152.00 EMT REFRESHER CLASSES 175563 18389 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,152.00 304411 12/13/2007 101073 HIGHWAY TECHNOLOGIES INC. 2,662.50 MESSAGE BOARD RENTAL 00005403 175410 264199 -001 1301.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL 150.00 CORE DRILLS 00001523 175507 273384 -001 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS 2,812.50 304412 12/13/2007 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 174.04 FLUSHOMETER 00002237 175736 2325587 5620.6530 REPAIR PARTS 116.53 SOAP 00002235 175737 2324895 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES 290.57 304413 12/13/2007 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 126.00 175611 437912 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 1.144.15 175612 437972 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 304414 12/13/2007 102044 HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC. 1,409.55 PLANNING & DESIGN SERVICES 175738 07 -54 47056.6710 1,409.55 304415 12113/2007 120640 HP EXPRESS SERVICES 2,658.00 SERVICE AGREEMENT - SCADA 00001667 175683 CUST 00169441' 5913.6180 GENERAL MAINTENANCE STREET NAME SIGNS EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK YORK SELLING YORK SELLING EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT MASTER PLAN: COUNTRYSIDE CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG LuG20000 CITY Or .aA 12/1-_- ,j7 8:30:45 Council Check Register Page - 11 12/13/2007 -- 12/13/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 2,658.00 304416 12/1312007 100842 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 33.06 ONLINE INDICATORS FOR HEADSEM004482 175684 001834957 -002 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION 33.07 ONLINE INDICATORS FOR HEADSEM004482 175684 001834957 -002 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 256.10 WIRELESS HEADSETS 00004482 175685 001834957 -003 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 512.03 WIRELESS HEADSETS 00004482 175685 001834957 -003 1180.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ELECTION 834.26 304417 1211312007 100812 IAAO 335.00 DUES 175411 2007 - 00011699 1190.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ASSESSING 335.00 304418 12/13/2007 105051 INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORTATION EN 256.00 DUES - JACK SULLIVAN 175739 120107 1260.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ENGINEERING GENERAL 256.00 304419 12/13/2007 101861 J.H. LARSON COMPANY 127.91 LIGHTING 00001568 175508 4140235 -01 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 127.91 304420 12/13/2007 105153 JACKSON LANDSCAPE SUPPLY INC. 2,414.09 HYDROSEED PAMELA PK 00001367 175564 0174392 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 2,414.09 304421 12/13/2007 100828 JERRY'S FOODS 11.20 175686 120107 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 12.23 175686 120107 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 16.65 175686 120107 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 42.73 175686 120107 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 89.58 175686 120107 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 172.39 304422 12/13/2007 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 6.98 175509 113007 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 10.18 175509 113007 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 15.95 175509 113007 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 16.46 175509 113007 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 17.23 175509 113007 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 17.86 175509 113007 5210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF DOME PROGRAM 17.98 175509 113007 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 18.05 175509 113007 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12112/2007 8:30:45 Council Check Register Page - 12 12/13/2007 -- 12113/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 19.99 175509 113007 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 41.84 175509 113007 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 52.81 175509 113007 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 62.63 175509 113007 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 70.46 175509 113007 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 71.28 175509 113007 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 82.13 175509 113007 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 106.29 175509 113007 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 110.95 175509 113007 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 164.07 175509 113007 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING 197.27 175509 113007 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 239.59 175509 113007 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 286.03 175509 113007 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 501.79 175509 113007 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,127.82 304423 12/13/2007 100830 JERRY'S PRINTING 191.70 FINAL BILLING PADS 175769 41809 5910.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL (BILLING) 191.70 304424 12/13/2007 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 11,281.54 175469 1124884 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,845.00 175470 1124893 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,526.42 175613 887564 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,583.00 175614 887563 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 1,033.20 175615 1124894 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 244.50 175807 888577 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 8,651.16 175808 888576 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,408.55 175809 1124880 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 515.60 175810 1124892 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,848.45 175811 1124919 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 32,937.42 304426 12/1312007 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 4,012.51 175471 1357161 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7,544.35 175472 1357162 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 166.40 175473 1358147 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,524.50 175474 1357167 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,296.96 175475 1357164 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,245.16 175476 1357169 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING .98- 175477 333414 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 4.90- 175478 362521 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF __.,JA Council Check Register 12/13/2007 -- 12113/2007 12/1-_.,j7 8:30:45 Page- 13 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 38.20- 175479 361583 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 819.86 175616 1361210 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,152.63 175617 1361209 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 101.08 175618 1361206 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 62.22 175619 1361208 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 293.93 175620 1361207 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5,381.02 175621 1361211 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 150.00 175622 1357804 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 4,746.93 175623 1357157 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,833.50 175812 1361205 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,602.92 175813 1361197 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 376.49 175814 1361195 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,670.03 175815 1361198 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 161.31 175816 1361196 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,668.24 175817 1361200 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 619.58 175818 1361201 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5,365.65 175819 1361202 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3,925.13 175820 1361204 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 260.24 175821 1361199 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 62.66 175822 1361203 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 15.18 CREDIT TAKEN TWICE 175823 348205 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 45.08- 175824 337095 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 43.53- 175825 330617 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 6.72- 175826 360875 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 51,919.07 304427 12/13/2007 100919 JOHNSON, NAOMI 72.65 PETTY CASH 175539 120507 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 141.14 PETTY CASH 175539 120507 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 174.26 PETTY CASH 175539 120507. 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 388.05 304428 12/13/2007 121705 JONES, MARK A 2,507.70 ENGINEERING FEE 175741 112607 1240.4345 ENGINEERING FEES PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL 42,969.60 DEVELOPERS SECURITY 175741 112607 1000.2066 ESCROW DEPOSITS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 45,477.30 304429 12113/2007 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS ,73.59 TOW 00001579 175510 56482 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 73.59 304430 12/13/2007 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12112/2007 8:30:45 Council Check Register Page - 14 12/13/2007 -12/13/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 117.32 DWI TOW 175540 120507 4601.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE FORFEITURE 117.32 304431 12113/2007 121707 KUZNIA, AARON 64.99 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 175740 120707 1260.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ENGINEERING GENERAL 64.99 304432 12/13/2007 102229 LAKE SUPERIOR COLLEGE 350.00 GRADING & BASE CLASS 00005923 175687 00137325 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL 350.00 304433 12/1312007 100850 LAKELAND FLORIST SUPPLY INC. 31.50 WINTER DECORATIONS 00006387 175565 643818 5440.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 215.67 PINE WREATH 00002232 175742 642358 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 247.17 304434 1211312007 103257 LAND CARE EQUIPMENT CO. 47.93 SPEED SENSOR 00001499 175688 28798 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 47.93 304435 12/13/2007 121152 LEA, STEVE 150.00 PERFORMANCE 12/18/07 175590 120107 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 304436 12113/2007 100853 LEEF SERVICES 35.05 SHOP TOWELS 175412 1446677 5422.6201 LAUNDRY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 35.05 304437 1211312007 106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC. 234.84 SERVICE CONTRACT 175857 15629 1550.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 234.84 304438 12/1312007 110888 LOPEZ, ELIZABETH 83.05 MAAP MEETING EXPENSE 175770 121007 1190.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ASSESSING 83.05 304439 12/13/2007 102129 LOVEGREEN INDUSTRIAL SERVICES 656.95 CONVEYOR REPAIR 175743 85216 5821.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 656.95 304440 12/13/2007 101792 LUBE -TECH 576.46 WINDSHIELD WASHER FLUID 00001299 175511 1476396 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERP 3EN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF ­NA 12112i[007 8:30:45 Council Check Register Page- 15 12/1312007 -- 12/13/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 576.46 304441 12/13/2007 106672 LUGER, JEFF 59.36 DOG FOOD 175744 120707 5431.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE 59.36 304442 12/13/2007 102722 LYNN PEAVEY COMPANY 565.85 EVIDENCE BAGS 00003059 175566 170491 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 565.85 304443 12/13/2007 118608 M SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 45.00 WINE SPECTATOR 175745 663977 5820.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 50TH STREET GENERAL 45.00 304444 12/13/2007 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,121.50 175827 27883 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 499.15 175828 28268 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,620.65 304445 12/13/2007 100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 157.58 MIRROR 00001305 175689 2080491 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 157.58 304446 12/13/2007 119951 MACK, SAM 37.50 LIQUOR DECOY 175567 120407 1424.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR INSPECTION 37.50 304447 12113/2007. 100865 MAGNUSON SOD 18.52 SOD, BLACK DIRT 175512 113007 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 188.49 SOD, BLACK DIRT 175512 113007 1643.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT GENERAL TURF CARE 207.01 304448 12113/2007 114699 MANAGED SERVICES INC. 470.73 JANITORIAL SERVICE 175690 C001734 7410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 470.73 304449 12/13/2007 100868 MARK VII SALES 3,382.88 175480 266163 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,780.70 175481 264513 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,356.00 175624 266459 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,022.80 175625 266181 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,563.30 175626 266887 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/12/2007 8:30:45 Council Check Register Page - 16 12/1312007 -- 12/13/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 18.45 175627 266888 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,470.73 175829 268431 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 809.40 175830 265979 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 692.35 175831 268257 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 20,096.61 304450 12/7312007 101790 MCMAHON, DANIEL 330.52 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 175771 120707 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 330.52 304451 12/13/2007 101483 MENARDS 92.66 LIGHTBULBS 00006377 175413 90610 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 220.48 CLIPS, JOIST HANGERS, NAILS 00001370 175513 92980 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 22.94 HARDBOARD 00001546 175514 93068 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 69.14 PAINTING SUPPLIES 00006380 175568 92614 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 405.22 304452 12/1312007 101987 MENARDS 53.98 PLUMBING PARTS 00002238 175746 54187 5620.6530 REPAIR PARTS EDINBOROUGH PARK 343.61 HOLIDAY DECORATIONS 00002229 175747 52898 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 196.98 HOLIDAY DECORATIONS 00002236 175748 53615 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 285.26 HOLIDAY DECORATIONS 00002227 175749 50279 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 53.24- RETURN 175750 53841 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 826.59 304453 12/13/2007 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 40.00 SCRUBBER REPAIR 175515 73026 5841.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE YORK OCCUPANCY 40.00 304454 12/13/2007 100885 METRO SALES INC 241.76 STAPLES FOR COPIER 175751 93632A 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 241.76 304455 12/1312007 102507 METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS 102.00 OFFICIATING FEES 175516 3251 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 102.00 304456 12113/2007 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME 311,064.51 SEWER SERVICE 175535 0000861694 5922.6302 SEWER SERVICE METRO SEWER TREATMENT 311,064.51 304457 1211" 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF --,,4A Council Check Register 12/13/2007 -- 12/13/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 583.20 175832 0198069423 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 5917.6180 5913.6180 5913.6601 1301.6406 5421.6406 5110.6564 5120.5510 5913.6530 5913.6530 5913.6530 5914.5516 5917.6530 5610.6104 5610.6104 5610.6104 1553.6530 1553.6585 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS WATER PURCHASED GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CRAFT SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD 12112in107 8:30:45 Page - 17 Business Unit VERNON SELLING METER REPAIR DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION GENERAL MAINTENANCE GRILL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP REPAIR PARTS 583.20 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 304458 12113/2007 DISTRIBUTION 118464 MIDWESTTESTING TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR REPAIR PARTS 140.00 WATER METER TEST 00001269 175517 699 140.00 304459 12113/2007 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 975.00 INSTALL NEW CURBSTOP 00001664 175569 33066 975.00 304460 12113/2007 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 17,639.16 WATER PURCHASE 431 - 0005.300 175858 120507 17,639.16 304461 12/13/2007 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 5.75 CYLINDER 00001236 175691 RI 11071356 17.27 CARBON DIOXIDE 00006428 175752 R111070128 23.02 304462 12/13/2007 102014 MINNESOTA CLAY USA 29.60 CLAY 00009270 175541 50787 160.00 CLAY 00009270 175541 50787 189.60 304463 12/13/2007 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT 127.80 BREAKOFF FLANGES GASKEST 00001272 175414 0218483 1,027.90 WATER MAIN REPAIR CLAMPS 00001271 175415 0218486 . 37.28 STANDPIPE FLANGES 00001270 175416 0218590 2,296.34 3" COMPOUND METER 00001238 175417 0216396 712.72 2" METER 00001663 175570 0215802 4,202.04 304464 12113/2007 101459 MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK AS 345.00 ANNUAL CONFERENCE - L FULTON00002004 175418 5511 345.00 ANNUAL CONFERENCE - T SHIRLE100002004 175692 5520 711.00 CONFERENCE -A KATTREH, S MILLER 175753 5516 1,401.00 304465 12/13/2007 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 15.25 CAMLOCKS 00001494 175518 0074736 -IN 206.68 STAINLESS STEEL PLATES 00001302 175693 0074769 -IN 5917.6180 5913.6180 5913.6601 1301.6406 5421.6406 5110.6564 5120.5510 5913.6530 5913.6530 5913.6530 5914.5516 5917.6530 5610.6104 5610.6104 5610.6104 1553.6530 1553.6585 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS WATER PURCHASED GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CRAFT SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD 12112in107 8:30:45 Page - 17 Business Unit VERNON SELLING METER REPAIR DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION GENERAL MAINTENANCE GRILL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION COST OF GOODS SOLD METERS TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR REPAIR PARTS METER REPAIR CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS REPAIR PARTS ACCESSORIES ED ADMINISTRATION ED ADMINISTRATION ED ADMINISTRATION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/12/2007 8:30:45 Council Check Register Page - 18 12/13/2007 -- 12/13/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 221.93 304466 12/13/2007 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 11.52 ARM,ASSEMBLY 00001216 175694 449498F6W 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 116.45 SWITCHES, HOUSING 00001215 175695 449481F6W 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 127.97 304467 12/13/2007 101796 MPCA 23.00 LICENSE RENEWAL 175696 120607 5919.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 23.00 304468 1211312007 102776 MRPA 149.50 MEMBERSHIP RENEWALS 175519 120407 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS GOLF ADMINISTRATION 149.50 MEMBERSHIP RENEWALS 175519 120407 1640.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 598.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWALS 175519 120407 1600.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 598.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWALS 175519 120407 5610.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS ED ADMINISTRATION 1,495.00 304469 12/13/2007 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 27.52 OIL FILTERS 00006131 175419 602542 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 222.10 BIO- DIESEL FILTER KIT 00006131 175420 602542 -01 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 119.26 CASTOR FORKS, FILTERS 00006130 175421 602477 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 402.38 PIVOT PINS, BUSHINGS 00006130 175422 602477 -01 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 771.26 304470 12/13/2007 106662 NET LITIN DISTRIBUTORS - 30.95 PLASTIC UTENSILS 175754 30017 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 178.76 PLASTIC PLATES, NAPKINS 175755 30124 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,061.39 TABLECOVERS, CUPS 175756 30145 5620.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,271.10 304471 1211312007 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. 849.41 175482 46528 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 418.50 175628 46634 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,267.91 304472 12/1312007 104350 NIKE USA INC. 32.53 MERCHANDISE 00006017 175571 913134220 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 32.53 304473 12113/2007 104232 NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY 21.86 POWER CORD 00001488 175423 15557 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPER' GEN 0 1 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY O. AA 12/,, ,j7 8:30:45 Council Check Register Page - 19 12/13/2007 -- 12/13/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier! Explanation PO # Doc No — Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 21.86 304474 12/13/2007 102138 NORTHERN WINDS CONCERT BAND 75.00 PERFORMANCE 12/16/07 175589 120107 , 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 75.00 304475 12113/2007 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY 181.76 ART SUPPLIES 00009268 175542 35201800 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 38.16 DRAWING PAD TAPE BD 00009265 175543 35181800 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 15.98 BRUSH SET, SHEARS 00009242 175544 35026201 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 235.90 304476 12113/2007 100930 NORTHWESTERN TIRE CO. 1,815.74 TIRES 00001428 175424 NW- 110394 1553.6583 TIRES &TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,815.74 304477 12/13/2007 121551 NYNGAR, BATBAATAR 240.00 CLEANING & MAINTENANCE 175757 120607 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 240.00 304478 12113/2007 105901 OERTEL ARCHITECTS 2,105.50 STUDY FOR PW FACILITY 175697, #5 4402.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING 2,105.50 304479 12/13/2007 101470 ORVIS, JOAN 14,588.94 % PRO SERVICES 175772 121007 5510.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ARENA ADMINISTRATION 14,588.94 304480 12/13/2007 104002 PARTEK SUPPLY INC. 438.19 DRAIN TILE 00006163 175425 21841 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 438.19 304481 1211312007 101718 PARTS PLUS 121.04 AUTO PARTS 175758 113007 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 121.04 304482 12/13/2007 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 3,992.74 175483 8166882 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 453.00 175484 8166287 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,239.17 175485 8166894 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,614.20 175629 8167742 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,422.71 176833 8167756 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 12/13/2007 - 12113/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 959.71 175834 8167759 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 304483 12/1312007 YORK SELLING 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 275.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 175572 15903197 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 275.00 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 304485 1211312007 VERNON SELLING 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 289.98 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 175486 2542739 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 154.97 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 175487 2542536 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 70.23 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 175488 2542535 5862.5512 2,386.32 175489 2541842 5842.5513 2,445.43 175490 2541839 5842.5513 190.84- 175491 3373572 5822.5513 526.69 175630 2544849 5862.5512 533.44 175631 2544840 5862.5512 1,367.49 175632 2544850 5862.5513 3,700.96 175633 2544848 5862.5513 1,902.01 175634 2544841 5862.5513 865.05 175835 2544838 5822.5513 1,770.75 175836 2544836 5822.5513 177.14 175837 2544837 5822.5512 533.44 175838 2544839 5842.5512 125.01 175839 2544844 5842.5512 28.57 175840 2544845 5842.5515 1,455.15 175841 2544846 5842.5512 4,364.90 175842 2544842 5842.5513 86.16 175843 2544843 5842.5513 1,609.42 175844 2544847 5842.5513 24,202.27 304486 12/13/2007 105876 PIN CENTER, THE 620.00 CITY LAPEL PINS 175426 1107113 1550.6406 620.00 304487 12113/2007 100119 PING 134.92 GOLF CLUB 175573 8952874 5440.5511 109.47 GOLF CLUB 175574 8955262 5440.5511 131.39 GOLF CLUB 175575 8963884 5440.5511 211.39 GOLF CLUB 175576 8967055 5440.5511 587.17 12/12/2007 8:30:45 Page - 20 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES I R55CKREG LOG20000 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY CITY OF -NA 217.66 175635 Council Check Register 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 263.29 12113/2007 -- 12/13/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 304488 12/13/2007 106152 POWERPLAN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 849.30 106.50- CORE CREDIT 700825 175520 P24406 1646.6530 35.03 ADAPTER, WASHER, O -RING 00001073 175521 P25730 1553.6530 76.29 STARTING FLUID 00001566 175522 P26657 1553.6530 404.27 PINS, SEALS, BUSHINGS 00001214 175698 P26764 1553.6585 409.09 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 11.33- 175850 304489 12/1312007 121697 POT COMPANY INC. 218.27 BALSAM TREE 218.27 304.490 12113/2007 104424 PRIEDE, SOREN 608.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 608.00 00002003 175427 074066 5630.6406 Subledger Account Description REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS ACCESSORIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 1211- -u07 8:30:45 Page- 21 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTENNIAL LAKES 175545 113007 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 304491 12113/2007 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 217.66 175635 698618 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 263.29 175636 698615 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 467.40 175845 698622 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 849.30 175846 700825 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 191.95 175847 699093 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING " 8.31- 175848 739066 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10.00- 175849 739061 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 11.33- 175850 739064 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,959.96 304492 12113/2007 105690 PRO -TEC DESIGN INC. 249.00 SECURITY SERVICES 175428 51087 1120.6804 CITY HALL ADMINISTRATION 249.00 304493 12113/2007 100971 QUALITY WINE 4,016.80 175492 938312 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,530.42 175493 938867 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,230.00 175494 938865 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 530.75 175495 940367 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,212.17 175637 942132 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,198.11 175638 942266 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 314.30 175639 941877 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,050.68 175640 942182 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 141.20 175641 942130 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 78.00 175642 941462 -00 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,130.78 175643 942181 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/12/2007 8:30:45 Council Check Register Page - 22 12/13/2007 - 12/13/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 810.50 175644 941982 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 965.19 175645 842183 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 967.75 175646 942267 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 576.06 175647 942133 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 917.02 175648 942131 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,717.40 175649 941461 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8.00- 175650 932794 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 35.28- 175651 932776 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 7.50- 175851 940659 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 27,336.35 304494 12113/2007 101965 QWEST 55.19 175577 112807 5911.6188 TELEPHONE PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 57.88 175577 112807 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 83.19 175577 112807 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 96.43 175577 112807 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 101.79 175577 112807 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 106.55 175577 112807 1470.6188 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 161.59 175577 112807 5610.6188 TELEPHONE ED ADMINISTRATION 163.91 175577 112807 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 232.34 175577 112807 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 263.84 175577 112807 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 266.75 175577 112807 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 2,098.12 175577 112807 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 3,687.58 304495 12/13/2007 117692 R & B CLEANING INC. 2,343.00 RAMP STAIRWELL CLEANING 00001583 175578 232 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 2,343.00 304496 12/13/2007 105324 READY WATT ELECTRIC 3,684.00 CIVIL DEFENSE MAINTENANCE 175579 93338 1460.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CIVILIAN DEFENSE 3,684.00 304497 1211312007 102221 RECYCLING ASSOC OF MINNESOTA 75.00 RAM MEMBERSHIP 175699 2023 5952.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS RECYCLING 75.00 304498 12/13/2007 114489 RICOH AMERICAS CORPORATION 199.65 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 175700 H102500177 -21 7410.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE PSTF ADMINISTRATION 199.65 r R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY Ot AA 12/'i_. -j7 8:30:45 Council Check Register Page- 23 12113/2007 -- 12113/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 304499. 12/13/2007 100988 SAFETY KLEEN 107.94 PARTS WASHER CHANGE OUT 00001580 175523 MB02201223 1553.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 107.94 304500 12/13/2007 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 51.97 LUMBER 00001557 175524 40572624 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 28.29 LUMBER 00001569 175701 40573231 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 80.26 304501 12/13/2007 104239 SEAGER, KRISTI 125.00 PERFORMANCE 12120107 175591 120107 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 125.00 304502 12/13/2007 101587 SENIOR COMMUNITY SERVICES 843.00 DIAL -A -RIDE OCT 2007 175702 120107 1514.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DIAL -A -RIDE PROGRAM 843.00 304503 12/13/2007 101106 SERVICEMASTER 746.55 CLEAN COMPACTOR 175546 15705 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 746.55 304504 12113/2007 102995 SHAPCO PRINTING INC. 511.20 EMPLOYEE NEWSLETTER 175429 155620 -01 2210.6575 PRINTING COMMUNICATIONS 511.20 304505 12/1312007 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 403.32 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 175759 120607 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 403.32 304506 12/13/2007 121698 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 273.59 CYLINDER/PUMP REPAIR 00001519 175430 9320 -9 1335.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PAVEMENT MARKINGS 273.59 304507 12/13/2007 101000 SIR SPEEDY 60.71 BUSINESS CARDS 175431 55776 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 189.33 EMPLOYMENT APPLICATIONS 175432 55775 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 250.04 304508 12/13/2007 119745 SKYHAWKE TECHNOLOGIES LLC 510.52 MERCHANDISE 00006041 175580 0191708 -IN 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 510.52 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 12/13/2007 -- 12/1312007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No - Subledger Account Description 304509 12/13/2007 110977 SOW, ADAMA 357.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 175761 120607 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 628.00 CLEANING 175761 120607 5111.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 12/12/2007 8:30:45 Page - 24 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW 8 COMM CTR GENERAL SUPPLIES UNIFORM ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PSTF RANGE SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS ENGINEERING GENERAL EDINA CHEMICAL AWARENESS WATER TREATMEP 985.00 304510 12113/2007 105387 ST. PAUL LINOLEUM & CARPET CO. 383.15 GYMNASIUM CONSTRUCTION 175776 APPL 4 4401.6710 383.15 304511 12/13/2007 100650 STANLEY SECURITY SOLUTIONS INC 226.03 LOCKS 00001524 175525 MN -461439 5913.6406 226.03 304512 12113/2007 101015 STREICHERS 19.95 GLOVES 175581 1475895 1400.6203 133.05 SOLVENT, PATCHES 175703 1476723 7412.6406 153.00 304513 12/13/2007 104349 STRUCTURED NETWORK SOLUTIONS 121.00 PRINTER REPAIR 175773 12846 5410.6230 587.58 INSTALL WIRING 175774 12875 5410.6230 174.00 TROUBLESHOOT POS WIRING 175775 12976 5410.6230 882.58 304514 1211312007 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 174.45 HEADLAMP 00001217 175704 518545CVW 1553.6585 174.45 304515 12113/2007 100593 SULLIVAN, JOSEPH F 365.10 ABOUT TOWN COLUMN 175582 303 2210.6123 365.10 304516 1211312007 120595 T- MOBILE 51.62 SURVEYING PHONE 175705 112707 1260.6188 51.62 304517 1211312007 115355 TANDEM PRINTING 336.33 FLYERS, POSTERS 175859 81438 4201.6406 336.33 304518 12113/2007 118214 TESTAMERICA LABORATORIES INC. 220.50 RADIUM TESTING 00001666 175583 30061720 5915.6180 12/12/2007 8:30:45 Page - 24 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT GYMNASIUMS - SVIEW 8 COMM CTR GENERAL SUPPLIES UNIFORM ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PSTF RANGE SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MAGAZINE/NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE GENERAL SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS ENGINEERING GENERAL EDINA CHEMICAL AWARENESS WATER TREATMEP R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY Or _-,ANA Council Check Register 12/13/2007 -- 12113/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description CONTRACTED REPAIRS 121,--,07 8:30:45 Page - 25 Business Unit POOL OPERATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH PARK PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSULTING DESIGN' CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION BR -3 Browndale Avenue Bridge ENGINEERING GENERAL LS38 LS REHAB @ FRANCE AVE STS -322 STORMWATER DREDGING LS37 LS REHAB @ WALNUT DRIVE LS36 LIFT STATION #6 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR INSPECTION 220.50 304519 1211312007 105123 THEMESCAPES INC. 365.00 REPAIR ZIP LINE PULLEY 175433 20762 -2 5311.6180 365.00 304520 12/13/2007 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 194.00 175584 29916 5421.5514 41.55 175652 470893 5862.5514 235.55 304521 12/13/2007 121708 TIMBERLAND OUTDOOR SERVICES IN 532.50 INSTALL GARLAND ON LIGHTPOLES 175762 5931 5620.6103 532.50 304522 12/13/2007 120519 TIMM, ALEX 52.50 LIQUOR DECOY 175585 120407 1424.6103 52.50 304523 12/13/2007 102742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLAN 1,618.48 BROWNDALE AVE BRIDGE 175706 000200704778 10091.1705.21 1,271.51 BRIDGE INSPECTIONS 175707 000200704819 1260.6103 2,190.88 LIFT STATION #22 175708 000200704824 10038.1705.20 201.67 DREDGING PROJECT 175709 000200704832 04322.1705.20 4,007.31 LIFT STATION #21 175710 000200704823 10037.1705.21 2,766.40 72ND ST LIFT STATION 175711 000200704790 10036.1705.21 12,056.25 304524 1211312007 118158 TONKA MEDICAL SUPPLIES INC. 126.70 VINYL GLOVES 00009274 175547 700310 5110.6564 126.70 304525 12/13/2007 101042 TRIARCO 49.07 ART SUPPLIES 00009269 175548 122790 5120.5510 102.68 ART SUPPLIES 00009269 175548 122790 5110.6564 151.75 304526 12/1312007 120644 TUINENGA, TREVOR 56.25 LIQUOR DECOY 175586 120407 1424.6103 56.25 304527 12/13/2007 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. CONTRACTED REPAIRS 121,--,07 8:30:45 Page - 25 Business Unit POOL OPERATION COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINBOROUGH PARK PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSULTING DESIGN' CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING INSPECTION CONSULTING INSPECTION BR -3 Browndale Avenue Bridge ENGINEERING GENERAL LS38 LS REHAB @ FRANCE AVE STS -322 STORMWATER DREDGING LS37 LS REHAB @ WALNUT DRIVE LS36 LIFT STATION #6 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR INSPECTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 12/13/2007 -- 12113/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,339.77 SEED, STRAW, SUPPLIES 00006160 175434 18219 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT MEETING EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE PAPER SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES 12/12/2007 8:30:45 Page- 26 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS ADMINISTRATION CONTINGENCIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ENGINEERING GENERAL ENGINEERING GENERAL GRILL GRILL DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL YORK SELLING ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 1,339.77 304528 12/1312007 115379 U.S. BANK 33.60 MEETING EXPENSE 175860 120407 1120.6106 16.90 NET ZERO 175861 DEC407 1500.6103 50.50 304529 12/13/2007 103973 ULINE 104.63 ENVELOPES, TAPE 00003062 175587 21133139 1400.6406 104.63 304530 12113/2007 100371 UNITED RENTALS 103.73 SIDE BOLT KITS 00001479 175435 70116617 -001 1553.6530 103.73 304531 12/13/2007 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 275.00 CEAM WINTER CONFERENCE 175763 120707 1260.6104 260.00 CEAM WINTER CONFERENCE 175856 121007 1260.6104 535.00 304532 12/13/2007 101908 US FOODSERVICE INC 300.85 CUST 114300 175764 113007 5421.6406 1,010.00 CUST 114300 175764 113007 5421.5510 1,310.85 304533 12113/2007 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 286.85 TOOLBOXES 00001537 175526 491048 5913.6406 472.01 GLOVES, GAUGES, REBUILD KIT 00001534 175527 491656 5913.6406 379.00 HOSE FITTINGS, ADAPTERS 00001567 175712 496063 5913.6406 1,137.86 304534 12/13/2007 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. 10.98 PAGER 175862 Q6096083L 1550.6188 10.98 304535 12113/2007 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 510.71 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 175528 061981 -00 5842.6512 26.26 DUSTOFF MOP TREATMENT 175549 061567 -00 5111.6511 536.97 304536 12/17' 101066 VIKING ELECTRIC SUPPLY MEETING EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES TELEPHONE PAPER SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES 12/12/2007 8:30:45 Page- 26 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS ADMINISTRATION CONTINGENCIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ENGINEERING GENERAL ENGINEERING GENERAL GRILL GRILL DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL YORK SELLING ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT r � R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY O __.NA 12/'i-- ,j07.8:30:45 Council Check Register Page - 27 12/13/2007 -- 12/1312007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 92.60 WIRE 14/12 SEOW 00001490 175713 2364374 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 92.60 304537 12/13/2007 101069 VOSS LIGHTING 20.98 LIGHTING 00001526 175436 15090817 -01 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 20.98 304538 12/1312007 102886 WAGNER GREENHOUSES INC. 657.25 POINSETTIAS 175765 205069 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK 657.25 304539 12/13/2007 103466 WASTE MANAGEMENT - SAVAGE MN 2,219.96 WASTE DISPOSAL 00001578 175437 4355957- 2282 -6 1314.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET RENOVATION 3,536.34 REFUSE 175529 4361184- 2282 -9 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 4,414.04 REFUSE 175530 4355606- 2282 -9 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 10,170.34 304540 12/13/2007 101076 WEST PHOTO 69.06 VELVET FINEART, PREMIUM LUSTR ®009261 175550 8781 5125.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 69.06 304541 12113/2007 105613 WICKLUND, MITZI 80.81 MAAP MEETING EXPENSE 175777 121007 1190.6106 MEETING EXPENSE ASSESSING 120.28 MAAP MEETING EXPENSE 175777 121007 1190.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ASSESSING 201.09 304542 12/13/2007 121696 WILLIAMS, CLAIRE 20.00 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 175438 120307 4090.4751 PARKING PERMITS STREET REVOLVING 20.00 304543 12113/2007 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 5,202.39 175496 181034 -00 5862:5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,648.12 175497 181043 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,606.09 175653 181655 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,338.25 175654 181659 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 660.80 175655 181667 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,247.16 175656 181663 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 17,702.81 304544 12/1312007 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 2,101.60 175498 212827 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 783.00 175657 212086 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 1211212007 8:30:45 Council Check Register Page - 28 12/13/2007 -- 12113/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 538.48 175658 212156 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,434.36 175659 213695 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 6,118.17 175660 213697 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 30.75- 175661 35680 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,008.13 175852 213693 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,886.55 175853 213696 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,603.44 175854 213694 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 15,442.98 304545 12/13/2007 112954 WISCONSIN TURF EQUIPMENT CORP. 135.91 WHEEL & TIRE ASSEMBLY 00001483 175531 543065 -000 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 86.29 BELT 00001486 175532 543127 -000 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 222.20 304546 1211312007 121699 WM LAMPTRACKER INC. 370.01 LAMP RECYCLING 175533 301369 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET RUBBISH 370.01 304547 12/13/2007 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 460.02 175662 203757 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 426.00 175855 203912 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 886.02 304548 12113/2007 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 28,013.50 W 70TH ST ROUNDABOUTS 175714 9 01336.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION BA336 W70TH - FRANCE TO YORK 28,013.50 304549 12113/2007 101726 XCEL ENERGY 14.45 51- 4151897 -6 175439 134055358 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 492.32 51- 6046826 -0 175440 133772131 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 199.38 51- 4156445 -0 175441 133731835 5932.6185 LIGHT & POWER GENERAL STORM SEWER 88.26 51- 5634814 -2 175442 133768637 5933.6185 LIGHT & POWER PONDS & LAKES 37.00 51- 7567037 -0 175443 134114690 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 2,676.36 51- 6621207 -1 175444 134098958 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 849.44 51- 6979948 -4 175445 134106834 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 984.25 51- 6979948 -4 175445 134106834 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,109.50 51- 6979946 -4 175445 134106834 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK OCCUPANCY 80.21 51- 5938955 -6 175446 133771316 4086.6185 LIGHT & POWER AQUATIC WEEDS ' 303.41 51- 6137136 -8 175447 134247473 5430.6185 LIGHT & POWER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 14,362.20 51- 4888627 -1 175448 134221229 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 13,716.31 51- 5605640 -1 175588 134237796 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 2,941.30 51- 6121102 -5 175715 134405136 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTEF 0 � r ' R55CKREG _JG20000 CITY. iNA 1�L. j07 8:30:45 Council Check Register Page - 29 12/13/2007 -- 12/13/2007 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 7,075.76 51- 4966303 -6 175766 133750396 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 3,864.66 51- 6824328 -7 175778 134595595 5420.6185 LIGHT & POWER CLUB HOUSE 3,614.62 51- 4966303 -6 175779 134642230 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 3,099.37 51- 6840050 -6 175863 134594285 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 55,508.80 304550 12/1312007 100568 XEROX CORPORATION 28.66 NOV USAGE - BLDG /ENG 00004322 175449 029283501 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 137.85 NOV USAGE - PARK & REC 00004322 175450 029283502 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 103.93 NOV USAGE 175551 029283676 5110.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 222.59 PRINTER SUPPLIES 175864 100880568 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 493.03 304551 1211312007 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 151.40 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 175451 54163563 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 151.40 1,055,455.68 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,055,455.68 Total Payments 1,055,455.68 R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 12/1212007 8:32:42 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 124,925.03 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 1,149.53 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND. 63,060.64 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 2,087.37 05100 ART CENTER FUND 4,071.84 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 215.99 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 365.00 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 13,179.92 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 29,647.08 05600 EDINBOROUGH/CENT LAKES FUND 10,226.41 05800 LIQUOR FUND 308,891.25 05900 UTILITY FUND 461,489.48 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 753.15 05950 RECYCLING FUND 34,033.00 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 1,359.99 Report Totals 1,055,455.68 Council Check Summary 12113/2007 - 12/13/2007 We confirm to the best of ou r bmudedge and belief, that these claims comply in all material lespecte with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing polld an procedures .j-&- .. Page- CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 10/26/07-11/26/07 Card Holder Merchant Account Name Trans Date Amount Purchase Discription Merchant Name Merchant City State Code JOHN KEPRIOS JOHN KEPRIOS JOHN KEPRIOS JOHN KEPRIOS JOHN KEPRIOS MIKE SIITARI MIKE SIITARI MIKE SIITARI MIKE SIITARI MIKE SIITARI JOHN WALLIN JOHN WALLIN JOHN WALLIN JOHN WALLIN 2007/10/28 $32.34 SOFTBALL UMPIRE MEETING 2007/11/05 $81.15 WALL PHONES 2007/11/08 $54.84 ADAPTIVE REC SUPPLIES 2007/11/09 $8.45 ADAPTIVE REC SUPPLIES 2007/11/09 $999.50 NOTEBOOK COMPUTER 2007/11/08 ($42.65) RETURN HEATER 2007/11/08 $42.65 HEATER 2007/11/08 $85.30 HEATERS 2007/11/08 $359.85 TACTICAL CLOTHING 2007/11/13 $85.30 HEATERS 2007/11/06 $204.26 WORKSHOP MEAL 2007111/09 $66.82 GOLF COURSE SUPPLIES 2007/11/14 $122.50 COMP PLAN MEAL 2007/11/20 $181.25 COMP PLAN MEAL $2,281.56 DAVANNI'S #15 - EDINA EDINA MN 4077.6406 PHONELADY COM 978 - 739 -4488 MA 5610.6406 MICHAELS #3739 BLOOMINGTON MN 1629.6406 MICHAELS #3702 RICHFIELD MN 1629.6406 CIRCUIT CITY SS #3136 BLOOMINGTON MN 5110.6406 TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1400.6406 TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1400.6406 TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1400.6406 UNDER ARMOUR DIRECT VI UNDERARMOU MD 1400.6203 TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1400.6406 PANERA BREAD #1307 SAINT LOUIS P MN 1100.6106 THE HOME DEPOT 2806 ST.LOUIS PARK MN 5422.6406 PANERA BREAD #1307 SAINT LOUIS P MN 1140.6103 PANERA BREAD #1307 SAINT LOUIS P MN 1140.6103 We confhm to the best ofowkn wfedge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of ft City 12- 1 of Edina purchasing pol i wwwwwi...ww Jew / < / tP `) o e t •'e To: Mayor & City Council From: John Wallin Finance Director Date: December 18, 2007 Subject: Levy and Budget Adoption Hearing REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # VLB Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adopt Resolution approving the budget for 2008 expenditures at $30,536,263.00 and set the total Tax Capacity Levy at $22,010,231.00 and the total Market Value based debt budget and Referendum Levy at $595,438.00. Also transfer $185,794 surplus gymnasium construction funds to the Series 2005A debt service fund and $650,000 of the General Fund's unappropriated surplus to the construction fund as previously discussed. Info /Background: The attached resolution approves the General Fund budget and the tax capacity debt levies all as previously discussed. The 20 years of referendum levy were set in 1996 when the GO Park and Recreation Bonds Series 1996B were issued and reset when those bonds were refunded by GO Park and Recreation Bonds Series 2005A. For both issues all levies were set by law at 105% of the corresponding annual debt service payments. The debt service fund is now sufficient to cover any foreseeable tax shortages and I would recommend canceling the portion of the 2008 levy in excess of the annual debt service payment. Future referendum levies remain at the 105% level and would require canceling a portion of the levy- on an annual basis depending on the amount needed to maintain a sufficient debt service fund. RESOLUTION NO. 2007 -133 RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE CITY OF EDINA FOR THE YEAR 2008, AND ESTABLISHING TAX LEVY FOR YEAR 2008, PAYABLE IN 2008 City Of Edina THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA MINNESOTA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: The Budget for the City of Edina for the calendar year 2008 is hereby adopted as after this set forth, and funds are hereby appropriated therefore: GENERAL FUND GENERAL GOVERNMENT Mayor and Council $ 90,530 Administration 1,017.760 Planning 463,755 Finance 674,476 Election 204,068 Assessing 834,944 Legal and Court Services 348,590 7,796,069 TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT PUBLIC WORKS Administration $ 209,511 Engineering 1,022,207 Streets 5,168,528 TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS PROTECTION OF PERSONS AND PROPERTY Police $ 7,796,069 Civilian Defense 64,592 Animal control 95,381 Fire 4,611,104 Public Health 502,730 Inspections 1,028,054 TOTAL PROTECTION OF PERSONS/PROPERTY PARK DEPARTMENT Administration $ 733,304 Recreation. 420,052 Maintenance 2,688,544 TOTAL PARK DEPARTMENT NON-DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES Contingencies $ 126,900 Special Assessments /City. Property 30,000 Capital Plan Appropriation 50,000 Employee Programs 140,200 Commissions /Special Projects 233,343 TOTAL NON - DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES TOTAL GENERAL FUND DEBT SERVICE - HRA PUBLIC PROJECT BONDS - $ SERIES 2002 DEBT SERVICE - HRA PUBLIC PROJECT BONDS - $ SERIES 2005A DEBT SERV ICE -• CIP PLAN BONDS - SERIES 2007A $ TOTAL EXPENDITURES $ City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 3,734,123 6,400,246 14,097,930 3,841,900 580,443 28,654,642 1,040,186 385,794 455,641 30,536,263 (612) 927 -8861 FAX (612) 826 -0390 TDD (612) 826 -0379 Section 2. Estimated receipts other than the General Tax Levy are proposed as hereinafter set forth: GENERAL FUND MVHC /Abatements $ (73,000) Licenses and Permits Municipal Court Funds Department Service Charges Other Transfer from Liquor fund Income on Investments Aid -Other Agencies Police Aid 2,715,050 925,000 2,637,388 373,000 742,800 275,000 400,000 345,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED RECEIPTS $ 8,340,238 Section 3. That there is proposed to be levied upon all taxable real and personal property in the City of Edina a tax rate sufficient to produce the amounts hereinafter set forth: GENERAL FUND $ 20,314,404 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF HRA PUBLIC PROJECT BONDS $ 1,040,186 — SERIES 2002 LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF HRA PUBLIC PROJECT BONDS $ 200,000 - SERIES 2005A LEVY FOR PAYMENT OF CIP PLAN BONDS - SERIES $ 455,641 2007A TOTAL LEVY $ 22,010,231 Section 4. That this budget proposes to transfer to the Series 2005A bonds Debt Service Fund the following amount: SURPLUS FUNDS OF -THE GYMNASIUM $ 185,794 CONSTRUCTION FUND TOTAL TRANSFERS TO DEBT SERVICE FUNDS $ 185,794 Section 5. That transfers from the General Fund Unappropriated Reserves be made for the following purposes: TO FUND ART IN THE PARK $ 10,000 TO PREPAY THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR TODD $ 165,000 PARK TO FUND VARIOUS PROJECTS WITHIN THE $ 475,000 CONSTRUCTION FUND TOTAL TRANSFERS TO THE CONSTRUCTION FUND $ 650,000 Section 6. That there is proposed to be levied upon all taxable real and personal property in the City of Edina, a tax rate sufficient to produce the amount below for the debt levy of the market value based referendum levy and canceling the portion of the levy not required to produce the following amount: GO_PARK AND RECREATION BONDS SERIES 1996B/2005A $ 595,438 Passed and adopted by the City Council on December 18, 2007. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk . James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK - I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 18, 2007, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_. City Clerk 1 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor Hovland and members of Agenda Item VI. C. the Edina City Council. From: John Keprios, Director Consent Park & Recreation Department Information Only ❑ Date: December 18, 2007 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: RESOLUTION NO. 2007-132 ❑ Motion Year 2008 Park & Recreation Fees ® Resolution & Charges ❑ Ordinance ( Edinborough Park Daily Admission) ❑ Discussion RECOMMENDATION: The Edina Park Board recommends that the 2008 daily admission fee for Edinborough Park pool & track be $5.50 for residents and non - residents. The Park Board recommends that the 2008 Edinborough Playpark (Adventure Peak and Great Hall) daily admission be $5.50 for residents and non - residents. The Park Board also recommends that the 2008 total facility daily admission (combination pool, track and Playpark) be $9.00 for residents and non - residents. INFO/BACKGROUND: From the day Edinborough Park opened its doors in 1987 until 2002; daily admission to Edinborough Park was the same fee for residents and non - residents. When Adventure Peak playground was installed in 2002, the daily admission fee structure was changed to give Edina residents a $1.00 discount on daily admission to both the pool & track and Playpark. Currently Edinborough Park attracts guests from all over the state and even the upper Midwest. Groups travel over an hour to spend the day at the park. Guests from outside of Minnesota pick the Residence Inn because of the amenities the Park offers. Daily admissions are typically only 20% Edina residents. In the past year an estimated 12,535 Edina youth visited Edinborough. Since our adults are free they are not included in this number. Over 63,000 youth participate annually in the recreational, social, educational and physical activities offered at Edinborough. Residents and non - residents get a discounted rate when they purchase a $45 10 -visit punch card ($1.00 off per visit from the daily admission rate). Twenty three percent of patrons who purchase punch cards for Adventure Peak are residents of Edina. This totals 478 cards sold to Edina Residents over the past year. If each card holder used their passes this would be another 4,780 visits last year. Forty two percent of our Pool and Track Punch Card Patrons are Edina Residents. This totals 144 Pool and Track punch cards purchased by Edina Residents in 2007. Edina residents prefer the Season Passes. Because of affordable pricing and a convenient location, Edina residents who plan to visit the park often tend to buy the season pass. Sixty two percent (62 %) of our Adventure Peak Season Pass holders are Edina residents, while eighty -five percent (85 %) of our Pool and Track members are residents. While we continue to serve the greater Metro area we continue to be a prime attraction to Edina residents of all ages. Over the previous years, our staff has found the $1.00 resident discount to be problematic and therefore staff and Park Board recommend elimination of the daily admission discount for the following reasons: • We catch people several times daily stating that they are Edina residents, when in fact they are not, which results in numerous embarrassing and awkward moments for patrons and staff. • It takes extra time with already long lines to check ID's, which negatively affects everyone who is waiting to get into the park. • Edina residents are often offended when asked for ID proof of residency, but we have to ask because so many people don't tell the truth. • Most Minnesota community centers do not offer discounted daily admissions for residents. • More Edina residents than non - residents purchase season passes. • We do offer a discount to residents for season passes and resident discounted 10- visit punch passes. • Edinborough Park's fee structure is not consistent with our other enterprise facilities (i.e. Edina Aquatic Center and Braemar Arena offer discounted season passes, but no discount on daily admissions). Eliminating the daily admission $1.00 discount will encourage residents to purchase the discounted 10 -visit punch pass or season ticket. It will speed up the admission process eliminate embarrassing moments, reduce staff time spent checking identifications, and will become consistent with our other enterprise facility fee structure. . RESOLUTION NO. 2007 - 132 SETTING 2008 EDINBOROUGH PARK DAILY ADMISSION FEES BE IT RESOLVED that the Edina City Council does hereby approve and sefythefCillld following 2008 Park and Recreation Fees. EDINBOROUGH PARK 2007 2008 Playpark Daily Admission: Resident $4.50 /person $5.50 Non- resident $5.50/ person $5.50 Playpark Punch Pass —10 Uses Resident $40.00 $45.00 Non - resident $45.00 $45.00 Pool & Track Daily Pass: Resident $4.50 $5.50 Non - resident $5.50 $5.50 Total Facility Daily Admission: Resident $_7.00 $9.00 _ Non - resident _ 1 $9, .00 $9.00 City Clerk Mayor - - - -- STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk -for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of December 18, 2007, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting, WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this __ day of _ -120. City Clerk City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379 I f Y oe g To: Mayor & City Council From: John Wallin Finance Director Date: December 18, 2007 Subject: Fees and Charges REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # VLD Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ® Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Approve second reading of Fees Ordinance 2007 -19 Info /Background: Attached are the following schedules for fees and charges proposed for 2008. 1) Schedule of General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01- Schedule A 2) Ordinance No. 2007 -19 amending Code Section 185 Increasing Certain Fees. No changes have been made from first reading on December 4. City of Edina Proposed SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE 2007 2008 General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A AMOUNT DEPT REV 200 200.04 Public Dance Permit 52.00 53.00 Clerk 4137 215 215.04 Bingo Occasion, Gambling Device, 15.00 15.00 per permit Clerk 4313 Raffle Permit 220 220.04 Machine or Amusement Device License 15.00 15.00 annually per establishment, plus Health 4176 15.00 15.00 per machine Health 4176 225 225.04 Special Events Application Fee 50.00 50.00 Clerk 4125 300 300.02 Subd 2 Redemption of Impounded Animals 30.00 30.00 per day for feeding & care, any veterinarian services and impounding Police 4331 fee of: 40.00 40.00 a) If animal has not been impounded within one year prior to the date Police 4331 of impounding 65.00 65.00 b) If animal has been impounded once within the year prior to the date Police 4331 of impounding 115.00 115.00 c) If animal has been impounded twice or more within one year prior Police 4331 to the date of impounding 300 300.02 Subd 3 Disposal of Animal 40.00 40.00 per animal Police 4331 300 300.03 Subd. 3 Dog License 15.00 15.00 per dog Police 4120 10.00 10.00 per neutered dog Late charge after March 1 10.00 10.00 Police 4120 300 300.03 Subd. 4 Duplicate Dog License Tag 6.00 6.00 per duplicate tag Police 4120 300 300.04 Subd. 2 Commercial Kennel License 55.00 55.00 per year Police 4174 300 300.15 Permit for Extra Dogs or Cats 100.00 100.00 Police 4120 405 405.01 Landscaping, Screening, or Erosion 100.00 100.00 Planning 4361 Control Site Plan Permit 410 410.02 Subd. 1 Building Permit If total valuation of work is: Then amount is: $ 1 to 500 23.50 23.50 * Building 4111 501 to 2,000 23.50 23.50 * for first $500 plus Building 4111 3.05 3.05 for each additional $100 or fraction thereof to and including $2,000 Building 4111 2,001 to 25,000 69.25 69.25 * for first $2,000 plus Building 4111 14.00 14.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $25,000 Building 4111 25,001 to 50,000 391.25 391.25 * for first $25,000 plus Building 4111 10.10 10.10 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $50,000 Building 4111 50,001 to 100,000 643.75 643.75 * for first $50,000 plus Building 4111 7.00 7.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000 Building 4111 100,001 to 500,000 993.75 993.75 * for first $100,000 plus Building 4111 5.60 5.60 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $500,000 Building 4111 500,001 to 1,000,000 3,233.75 3,233.75 * for the first $500,000 plus Building 4111 4.75 4.75 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including • . Building 4111 $1,000,000 1,000,001 and up 5,608.75 5,608.75 * for the first $1,000,000 plus Building 4111 3.65 3.65 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof Building 4111 * plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 16B.70 Building 4380 Plan Review 65% 65% of Permit Fee Building 4111 410 410.02 Subd. 2 Other Permit Related Fees 47.00 49.00 per hour or the total hourly cost to City, whichever Building 4111 is greatest. (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) G:\Bu, -ees & Charges\2008 Fees & Charges\2008 Proposed Fees & Charges.xls 12/13/2 55 PM City of Edina Pro SECTION _ ECTION . PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE 2007 General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A AMOUNT PT REV 410 410.02 Subd. 3 Residential Building Contractor, 5.00 5.00 surcharge pursuant to M.S. 326.86 Building 4380 Remodeler or Specialty Contractor License Verification 415 415.02 Permit for Moving of Building 212.00 212.00 Building 4111 415 415.02 Subd. 3 Indemnity Deposit for Damages 530.00 530.00 unless licensed by Commissioner of Transportation Building 2605 Sustained by Moving of Building 421 421.03 R -O -W Work Annual Registration 200.00 200.00 Engineer 4341 421 421.04 R -O -W Excavation Permit Administrative 75.00 75.00 Engineer 4341 Fee Per Additional Excavation -Paved Area 35.00 35.00 Engineer 4341 Per Additional Excavation - Unpaved Area 20.00 20.00 Engineer 4341 Underground Utility/Telecom Installation 45.00 45.00 per 100 L. Ft. Engineer 4341 - Directional Boring or Tunneling (Plus Minimum Permit Fee) Underground Utility/Telecom Installation 60.00 60.00 per 100 L. Ft. Engineer 4341 - Open Trenching (Plus Minimum Permit Fee) Overhead Utility/Telecom Installation 5.00 5.00 per 100 L. Ft. Engineer 4341 (Plus Minimum Permit Fee) 421 421.07 Subd. 3 Street Surface Repair 50.00 50.00 Per square foot under 10 square feet Engineer 4343 40.00 40.00 Per square foot from 10 -25 square feet Engineer 4343 35.00 35.00 Per square foot over 25 square feet Engineer 4343 430 430.03 Subd. 8 Installer's Licenses: Oil Burner; Stoker; 55.00 55.00 Building 4117 Steam or Hot Water Heating, Mechanical Warm Air Heating and Air Conditioning; Refrigeration, and Gas Piping Installers 435 435.07 Gas Piping Permit; Oil Burner, Stoker, Minimum Fee: Steam or Hot Water Heating, Mechanical 22.00 22.00 Residential - plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 166.70 Building 4115 Warm Air Heating and Air Conditioning; 27.00 27.00 Commercial - plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 166.70 Building 4115 or Refrigeration Permit Fee Calculations: $0 to 1,000 16.00 16.00 * plus 3.10% >$ 500 Building 4115 1,001 to 5,000 31.50 31.50 * plus 2.60% > $ 1,000 Building 4115 5,001 to 10,000 135.50 135.50 * plus 2.15% > $ 5,000 Building 4115 10,001 to 25,000 243.00 243.00 * plus 1.85 %> $10,000 Building 4115 25,001 to 50,000 520.50 520.50 * plus 1.65% > $25,000 Building 4115 50,001 and over 933.00 933.00 * plus 1.30% > $50,000 Building 4115 * plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 1613.70 435 435.07 Subd. 1 Other Permit Related Fees 47.00 49.00 per hour or the total hourly cost to City, whichever is Building 4115 greatest (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved G: \Budget \Fees & Charges\2008 Fees & Charges\2008 Proposed Fees & Charges.xls 12/13/2007 1:55 PM City of Edina Proposed SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE 2007 2008 General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A AMOUNT DEPT RE 440 440.04 Plumbing or Water Conditioning Permit Minimum Fee: 15.00 Residential - per plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 166.7 Building 4112 27.00 27.00 Commercial - plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 1613.70 Fee Calculations: $0 to 300 15.00 15.00 Building 4112 $301 to 600 700 15.00 15.00 * plus 6:00% 1.75% >$ 300 Building 4112 $694 701 to 1,000 25.00 22.00 * plus 3.10 % >$ -600$700 Building 4112 1,001 to 5,000 31.50 31.50 * plus 2.60 %> $1,000 _ Building 4112 5,001 to 10,000 135.50 135.50 * plus 2.15% > $ 5,000 Building 4112 10,001 to 25,000 243.00 243.00 * plus 1.85% > $10,000 Building 4112 25,001 to 50,000 520.50 520.50 * plus 1.65% > $25,000 Building 4112 50,001 and over 933.00 933.00 * plus 1.30% > $50,000 Building 4112 * plus surcharge pursuant to M.S. 166.70 440 440.04 Installation or Testing of RPZ Backflow 27.00 27.00 Building 4306 Preventers 440 440.04 Subd. 1. Other Permit Related Fees 47.00 49.00 per hour or the total hourly cost to City, whichever Building 4306 is greatest. (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved.) 445 445.08 Surcharge for Prohibited Connection to 100.00 100.00 per month Building 4391 Sanitary Sewer 450 450.05 Swimming Pool Construction Same as the fees for a building permit (See 410.02 Subd.1, fees) Building 4111 450 450.27 Subd. 4 Public or Semi - Public Swimming Pool 470.00 470.00 per year for each enclosed pool (partial or all of the year) Health 4173 License 275.00 300.00 per year for each outdoor pool Health 4173 450 450.27 Subd. 4 Public or Semi - Public Whirlpool Bath or 155.00 165.00 per year for each bath or pool Health 4173 Therapeutic Swimming Pool License 460 460.06 Subd. 1 Sign Permit 80.00 80.00 Planning 4185 460 460.06 Subd. 1 Courtesy Bench Sign Permit 15.00 15.00 per year Planning 4185 460 460.06 Subd 6 Sign Variance Fee 200.00 200.00 Residential Property Planning 4361 400.00 400.00 Commercial Property Planning 4361 475 475.03 Subd. 1 Parking Ramp License 125.00 125.00 per year Building 4134 605 605.05 Subd. 1 Operational permits required by MSFC 47.00 49.00 Per hour with a minimum 1 hour fee. (Includes supervision, code review, Fire Section 105.6 inspections, overhead, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) G: \Bu -ees & Charges\2008 Fees & Charges\2008 Proposed Fees & Charges.xls 12/13/2 -55 PM City of Edina Pro, SECTION ECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE 2007 General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A AMOUNT PT REV 605 605.05 Subd. 1 Construction permits required by MSFC Section 105.7 except for those covered in City Code Section 625 If total valuation of work is: Then amount is: $1 to 500 23.50 24.70 *minimum fee Fire 501 to 2,000 23.50 24.70 * for first $500. plus Fire 3.05 3.20 for each additional $100 or fraction thereof to and including $2,000 2,001 to 25,000 69.25 72.70 * for first $2,000 plus Fire 14.00 14.70 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $25,000 25,001 to 50,000 391.25 410.80 * for first $25,000 plus Fire 10.10 10.60 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $50,000 50,001 to 100,000 643.75 675.75 * for first $50,000 plus Fire 7.00 7.35 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000 100,001 to 500,000 993.75 1,043.45 * for first $100,000 plus Fire 5.60 5.90 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $500,000 500,001 to 1,000,000 3,233.75 3,395.45 * for first $500,000 plus Fire 4.75 5.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $1,000,000 1,000,001 and up 5,608.75 5,889.20 * for first $1,000,000 plus Fire 3.65 3.85 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof Plan check 65% 70% of permit fee 605 605.05 Subd. 2 Code Compliance Inspection 47.00 49.00 Per hour with a minimum 1 hour fee. (Includes supervision, code review, Fire inspections, overhead, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) 615 615.03 License to Service Fire Extinguishers 50.00 50.00 per year per person licensed Fire 4325 620 620.04 Permit Fee for Cleaning Commercial 85.00 85.00 Fire 4321 Kitchen Exhaust Hood and Duct Systems 625 625.04 Subd. 1 Sprinkler Permit Fees: Per Number of Heads: 1- 5 47.00 49.00 * (minimum fee) Fire 4161 6- 25 115.00 120.00 * Fire 4161 26- 50 215.00 220.00 * Fire 4161 51- 75 285.00 290.00 * Fire 4161 76-100 345.00 350.00 * Fire 4161 101-125 380.00 385.00 * Fire 4161 126-150 410.00 415.00 * Fire 4161 151-175 445.00 450.00 * Fire 4161 176-200 465.00 470.00 * Fire 4161 201 plus 540.00 545.00 * for first 200 + $3.00 for each additional head Fire 4161 625 625.04 Subd. 1 Fire Pump Installation and Associated 230.00 235.00 Fire 4325 Hardware Standpipe Installation 140.00 145.00 Fire 4325 Each Additional Standpipe 30.00 35.00 Fire 4325 G: \Budget \Fees & Charges\2008 Fees & Charges\2008 Proposed Fees & Charges.xls 12/13/2007 1:55' I AA City of Edina Proposed SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE 2007 2008 General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A AMOUNT DEPT REV 625 625.04 Subd. 1 Fire alarm & alternative fire suppression permit If total valuation of work is: Then amount is: $1 to 500 23.50 24.70 *minimum fee Fire 501 to 2,000 23.50 24.70 * for first $500 plus Fire 3.05 3.20 for each additional $100 or fraction thereof to and including $2,000 2,001 to 25,000 69.25 72.70 * for first $2,000 plus Fire 14.00 14.70 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $25,000 25,001 to 50,000 391.25 410.80 * for first $25,000 plus Fire 10.10 10.60 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $50,000 50,001 to 100,000 643.75 675.75 * for first $50,000 plus Fire 7.00 7.35 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000 100,001 to 500,000 993.75 1,043.45 * for first $100,000 plus Fire 5.60 5.90 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $500,000 500,001 to 1,000,000 3,233.75 3,395.45 * for first $500,000 plus Fire 4.75 5.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $1,000,000 1,000,001 and up 5,608.75 5,889.20 * for first $1,000,000 plus Fire 3.65 3.85 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof Plan check 65% 70% of permit fee 625 625.04 Subd. 2 Other Permit Related Fees 47.00 49.00 Per hour with a minimum 1 hour fee. (Includes supervision, code review, Fire inspections, overhead, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) 635 635.02 False Fire Alarm 300.00 300.00 Residential Fire 4323 500.00 500.00 Commercial Fire 4323 640 640.02 License allowing sale of Fireworks 100.00 100.00 Per year Fire 4137 716 716.02 Recycling Service: 4.80 4.90 Per Quarter - Single Family Recycle 4640 4.80 4.90 Per Quarter - Double Bungalow Recycle 4640 4.00 4.10 Per Quarter - Apartments /Condos (2 -8 units) Recycle 4640 721 721.03 Subd. 1 Food Establishment 560.00 575.00 High risk food Health 4171 355.00 365.00 Medium risk food Health 4171 100.00 105.00 Low risk food Health 4171 125.00 130.00 Base fee Health 4171 53.00 55.00 Beer or wine table service Health 4171 110.00 125.00 Alcohol bar service Health 4171 138.00 138.00 Food vehicle Health 4171 120.00 135.00 Additional facility Health 4171 200.00 200.00 Pushcart Health 4171 120.00 120.00 Itinerant food Health 4171 15.00 15.00 Food vending machine Health 4172 721 721.03 Subd 1 Restaurant Plan Review Fee 100% of License Fee Health 4353 Restaurant Plan Review Fee for Remodel 50% of License Fee Minimum Restaurant Plan Review Fee 85.00 95.00 Health 4353 735 735.03 Lodging Establishment 5.00 7.00 per room Health 4177 Supervised Group Home 44.00 45.00 Health 4177 Boarding and Lodging House License 98.00 100.00 Health 4177 740 740.04 Multiple Dwelling Parking Garage 45.00 45.00 per single tract of land (may contain more than one building under Health 4179 same ownership) G: \Bi gees & Charges\2008 Fees & Charges\2008 Proposed Fees & Charges.xls 12/13/7 1:55 PM City of Edina Prr SECTION SECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE 2007 General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A AMOUNT :PT REV 740 740.04 Multiple Dwelling Parking Garage 78.00 80.00 per garage Health 4351 Inspection Fee 745 745.04 Subd. 2 Body Art Establishment License 260.00 260.00 Health 4137 810 810.09 Subd. 3C. Neighborhood Property Owner List 1.00 1.00 per property owner name Planning 4361 810 810.09 Plat and Subdivision Filing Fee 100.00 100.00 per lot for division of one or more lots where no new buildable Planning 4361 lots are created 600.00 600.00 plus $50 /lot - all plats and subdivision other than above Planning 4361 810 810.09 Subd. 2. Developer's Agreement Fee for City 6.5% of the total construction cost of such public improvements Planning 4361 Services Rendered in Connection with Required Street, Water and Sewer Improvements 815 815.03 Antennas, Dish Antennas & Tower Same as for a building permit (See Subsection 410.02 Subd 1 fees) Building 4111 Permits 820 820.01 Filing of Application for Vacation of 425.00 425.00 Clerk 4391 Street, Alley or Easement 830 830.05 Subd. 2 Permit Fee for Tree Removal or Grading Building 4118 If total valuation of work is: Then amount is: $1 to $5,000 150.00 150.00 $5,001 to $100,000 150.00 150.00 for first $5,000 plus 2.00 2.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000 $100,001 and up 340.00 340.00 for first $100,000 plus 1.00 1.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof 830 830.05 Subd. 2 Permit Fee for Open Pit or Excavation Building 4118 If total valuation of work is: Then amount is: $1 to $5,000 150.00 150.00 $5,001 to $100,000 150.00 150.00 for first $5,000 plus 2.00 2.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000 $100,001 and up 340.00 .340.00 for first $100,000 plus 1.00 1.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof 830 830.05 Subd. 2 Other Permit Related Fees 47.00 49.00 per hour or the total hourly cost to City, whichever Building 4111 is greatest. (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved.) 845 845.04. Restricted Access Parking Lot License 500.00 500.00 Planning 4137 Renewals: 100.00 100.00 0 - 50 spaces Planning 4137 150.00 150.00 51 - 100 spaces Planning 4137 250.00 250.00 100 - 200 spaces Planning 4137 400.00 400.00 Over 200 spaces Planning 4137 850 850.04 Subd. 1C Variance Fee 200.00 200.00 Residential Planning 4361 400.00 400.00 Commercial Planning 4361 850 850.04 Subd. 2A.2 Fee for Transfer of Land to Another 400.00 400.00 (One) R -2 Lot Planning 4361 Zoning District 500.00 500.00 (Two) R -2 Lots Planning 4361 1,000.00 1,000.00 All other Transfers Planning 4361 850 850.04 Subd. 2 -5 Mailed Notices 1.00 1.00 A parcel Planning 850 850.173 Subd. 4C.1a Temporary Retail Sales in PID Permit 300.00 300.00 First Permit Planning 4361 200.00 200.00 Subsequent Permits Planning 4361 G: \Budget \Fees & Charges\2008 Fees & Charges\2008 Proposed Fees & Charges.xls 12/13/20071:55 PM City of Edina Proposed SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE 2007 2008 General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A AMOUNT DEPT REV 850 850.04 Subd. 4 A.2 Conditional Use Permit 700.00 700.00 Fee shall be equal to City staff time expended and City's direct Planning 4361 cost incurred in processing applications. 850 850.04 Subd. 5 C.1 Temporary Conditional Use Permit 75.00 75.00 Planning 4137 850 850.10 Subd. 1 D Landscaping Inspection 100.00 100.00 Planning 4361 850 850.04 Subd. 6 Final Development Plan Application Fee 750.00 750.00 Planning 4361 850 850.20 Subd. 10 Certificate of Appropriateness 175.00 175.00 Planning 4361 900 900.07 Subd. 1 Liquor License Fees (per year) Police 4130 300.00 300.00 Under 200 members 500.00 500.00 201 -500 members 650.00 650.00 501 -1000 members 850.00 850.00 1001 -2000 members 1,000.00 1,000.00 2001 -4000 members 2,000.00 2,000.00 4001 -6000 members 3,000.00 3,000.00 over 6000 members 8,500.00 8,500.00 On -Sale Intoxicating License - Restaurants only Police 4132 590.00 608.00 3.2 Beer License Off or On Sale Police 4130 2,000.00 2,000.00 Wine On -Sale - Restaurants only Police 4131 200.00 200.00 per event - Temporary On -Sale Intoxicating - Max 3 days by MS Police 4130 80.00 82.00 per event - Temporary On -Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor Police 4130 200.00 200.00 Sunday On -Sale License - Restaurants only Police 4130 1020 1020 False Automatic Alarm 110.00 110.00 for the 2nd thru 4th response within one calendar year Police 4332 200.00 200.00 for the 5th and subsequent false alarm within one calendar year 1040 1040.08 Loudspeaker Permit 19.00 19.00 Clerk 4137 1045 1045.05 Variance Fee RV's, Boats, etc. Storage 50.00 50.00 Planning 4361 1100 1100.03 Subd. 2 Sewer Service Charge: Based upon water usage during winter quarter. (November 1 to March 1) Single Family Dwellings, Townhouses, Two - Family Dwellings, Apartment Buildings Containing Four or Less 39.20 40.96 Per quarter up to and including 1600 cubic feet Finance 4641 Dwelling Units: 2.45 2.56 Additional from 1601 cubic feet and over Finance 4641 Apartment Buildings with More Than 35.28 38.86 Per quarter for each unit over four or Finance 4641 Four Dwelling Units: 2.45 2.56 per 100 cubic feet of water used during the quarter, whichever is greater Finance 4641 Commercial and Industrial Buildings, 39.20 40.96 Per water meter or approved sewage metering device on premises, or Finance 4641 Including Schools and Churches: 2.45 2.56 per 100 cubic feet of water used during the quarter, whichever is greater Finance 4641 1100 1100.03 Subd. 3 Industrial User Extra Strength Charges As allocated to City by Metropolitan Waste Control Commission Finance 4641 1100 1100.03 Subd. 4.A Shutting Off or Turning On Curb Water 25.00 25.00 For each turn -on and each shut -off. Finance 4628 Stops at Customer's Request or Due to Non - payment of Bill 1100 1100.04 Subd. 1.0 Issuance of Water Meter Cost of water meter, plus handling charges Finance 4627 G: \BL' -ees & Charges\2008 Fees & Charges\2008 Proposed Fees & Charges.xls 12/13/7 :55 PM City of Edina SECTION ECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A Pro ' 2007 i AMOUNT .PT REV 1100 1100.03 Subd. 2 Water Service 1. Per 100 cubic feet for areas of City, except as described in #2 below Finance 4626 0.93 0.99 Up to 3500 cubic feet 1.23 1.31 From 3600 cubic feet to 6500 cubic feet 1.93 2.05 Over 6500 cubic feet 2.78 2.86 2. Per 100 cubic feet - Morningside area and for east side of Beard Finance 4626 Ave. from West 54th to Fuller St. and both sides of Abbott PI. from West 54th St. to Beard Ave. Domestic accounts used by: Commercial and Industrial Buildings, 0.93 0.99 Up to 3500 cubic feet Including Schools and Churches: 1.23 1.3.1 Over 3500 cubic feet Lawn watering accounts used by: Commercial and Industrial Buildings, 1.23 1.31 Up to 3500 cubic feet Including Schools and Churches: 1.93 2.05 Over 3500 cubic feet Meter Charge: 11.23 12.01 Per quarter for up to 3/4 inch meter Finance 4627 15.38 16.36 Per quarter for 1 inch meter Finance 4627 17.54 18.66 Per quarter for 1 1/4 inch meter Finance 4627 19.73 21.00 Per quarter for 1 1/2 inch meter Finance 4627 31.78 33.81 Per quarter for 2 inch meter Finance 4627 120.68 128.40 Per quarter for 3 inch meter Finance 4627 153.60 163.44 Per quarter for 4 inch meter. Finance 4627 Flat Annual Charges as Follows: 0.00 0.00 Park Department for water used for sprinkling and skating rinks Finance 4626 0.00 0.00 Street Department for water used for flushing street Finance 4626 1105 1105.01 Subd. 1 Service Availability Charge (SAC) 1,675.00 1,825.00. Per SAC unit X number of SAC units computed pursuant to Subsection Building 4307 1105.01, Subd, 1 of this code 1105" 1105.02 Charge for Connection to City Water or 2,000.00 2,000.00 Minimum or assessment cost of like abutting properties Building 4116 Sewer System 1110 1110.03 Storm Water Drainage Charge 14.39 15.54 Per quarter pursuant to formula in Subsection 1110.03 Finance 4642 1115 1115.03 Water Surcharges Surcharges for violation of the Irrigation Bans are determined based on the number of water restriction violations issued to an owner in the previous three years and are as follows: First Offense 0.00 0.00 Written warning Second Offense 50.00 50.00 Third Offense 100.00 100.00 Fourth Offense 200.00 200.00 Each Additional Offense 300.00 300.00 1205 1205.01 Curb Cut Permit 40.00 40.00 Engineer 4344 1230 1230.07 Sidewalk Cafe Permit 633.00 633.00 Clerk 4137 1230.08 Temporary Liquor License Special Permit 315.00 315.00 Per event Clerk 4137 1235 1235.03 Subd. 2 Parking Permit 4.00 4.00 per month pro -rated Police 4751 Refund Parking Permit - Sticker Must 4.00 4.00 per month pro -rated Police 4751 Be Returned 1300 1300.02 Subd. 1 Refuse or Recycling Hauler's License 300.00 300.00 per year for 1 st vehicle Health 4178 _ 95.00 95.00 per year for each additional vehicle Health 4178 1311 -1311.03 Peddler /Solicitor Permit 30.00 30.00 per permit - valid for 14 calendar days Police 4128 1311.04 Subd. 1 Registration for Peddling /Soliciting 50.00 50.00 per registration - valid for 90 calendar days Police 4128 1325 1325.03 Tobacco Sale License 350.00 350.00 per location Health 4170 1341 1341.02 Registration for Massage Therapists 15.00 115.00 Per therapist for those businesses exempt from licensure Clerk 4137. G: \Budget \Fees & Charges\2008 Fees & Charges\2008 Proposed Fees & Charges.xls 12/13/20071:55 PM City of Edina SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE Proposed 2007 2008 General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A AMOUNT DEPT REV 1341 1341.05 Physical Culture & Health Service or 278.00 286.00 Business License Clerk 4137 Club, Reducing Club or Salon, Sauna Parlor, Massage Parlor or Escort Service License 1341 1341.05 Investigation Fee - Business License 1,500.00 1,500.00 Clerk 4314 1345 1345.05 Subd. 1 Sexually- oriented Business License 5,000.00 5,000.00 per year Clerk 4137 1345 1345.05 Subd. 2 Business License 1,500.00 1,500.00 At time of original application Clerk 4137 1350 1350.06 Subd. 1 Commercial Photography 29.00 30.00 Manager Permit - Still Photography Clerk 4133 118.00 120.00 Manager Permit - Motion Photography Clerk 4133 335.00 340.00 Council Permit Clerk 4133 1400 1400.12 Truck Restrictive Road Permit 60.00 100.00 Engineer 4190 1410 1410.01 Redemption of Impounded Vehicle Fee as posted in Police Department Police 4334 G: \Bi =ees & Charges\2008 Fees & Charges\2008 Proposed Fees & Charges.xls 12/13/" 1:55 PM ORDINANCE NO. 2007-19 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. The following described fees of Schedule A to Code Section 185 are amended to read as follows: SECTION SUBSEC. PURPOSE OF AMOUNT' I FEE /CHARGE - 200 200.04 Public Dance Permit $53.00 410 410.02 Subd. 2 Other Permit Related $49.00 per hour or the total hourly cost to Fees City, whichever is greatest. (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) 435 435.07 Subd. 1 Other Permit Related $49.00 per hour or the total hourly cost to Fees City, whichever is greatest. (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved 440 440.04 Plumbing or Water $15.00 Residential- plus surcharge pursuant Conditioning Permit to M.S. 16B.7 Fee calculations $0 to 300 $301 to 700 * plus 1.75% $701 to 1,000 $22.00 * plus 3.10 % >$700 1,001 to 5,000 5,001 to 10,000 10,001 to 25,000 25,001 to 50,000 50,001 and over 440 440.04 Subd. 1 Other Permit Related $49.00 per hour or the total hourly cost to Fees City, whichever is greatest. (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved 450 450.27 Subd. 4 Public or Semi - $300.00 per year for each outdoor pool Public Swimming Pool License 450 450.27 Subd. 4 Public or Semi- $165.00 per year for each bath or pool Public Whirlpool Bath or Therapeutic Swimming pool License 605 605.05 Subd. 1 Operational Permits $49.00 per hour or the total hourly cost to Required by MSFC City, whichever is greatest. (includes Section 105.6 supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved 605 605.05 Subd. 1 Construction Permits Required by MSFC Section 105.7 except for those covered in City Code Section 625 If total valuation of work is: $1 to $500 $24.70 *minimum fee 501 to 2,000 $24.70 *for first $500 plus $3.20 for each additional $100 or fraction thereof to and including $2,000 2,001 to 25,000 $72.70 *for the first $2,000 plus $14.70 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $25,000 25,001 to 50,000 $410.80 *for the first $25,000 plus $10.60 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $50,000 50,001 to 100,000 $675.75 *for the first $50,000 plus $7.35 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100,000 100,001 to 500,00 $1,043.45 *for the first $100,000 plus $5.90 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $500,000 500,001 to $3,395.45 *for -the first $500,000 plus 1,000,000 $5.00 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $1,000,000 1,000,001 and up $5,889.20 *for the first $1,000,000 plus $3.85 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof of permit fee Plan Check 70% 605 605.05 Subd. 2 Code Compliance $49.00 per hour or the total hourly cost to Inspection City, whichever is greatest. (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved 625 625.04 Subd. 1 Sprinkler Permit Fees: Per number of heads: 1 — 5 $49.00 * (minimum fee) 6-25 $120.00 * 26-50 $220.00 * 51-75 $290.00 * 76-100 $350.00 * 101-125 $385.00 * 126-150 $415.00 * . 151-175 $450.00 * 176-200 $470.00 * 201 plus $ 545.00 *for first 200 + $3.00 for each additional head 625 625.04 Subd. 1 Fire Pump Installation and Associated Hardware: $235.00 Standpipe Installation: $145.00 Each Additional Standpipe: $35.00 625 625.04 Subd. 1 Fire alarm & - Then amount is: alternative fire suppression permit. If total valuation of work is: $1 to 500 $24.70 * minimum fee 501 to 2,000 $24.70 * for first $500 plus $3.20 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $2, 000 2,001 to 25,000 $72.70 * for first $2,000 plus $14.70 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $25, 000 25,001 to 50,000 $410.80 * for first $25,000 plus $10.60 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $50, 000 50,001 to 100, 000 $675.75 * for first $50,000 plus $7.35 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $100, 000 100,001 to 500,000 $1,043.45 * for first $100,000 plus $5.90 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $500, 000 500,001 to 1 mil. $3,395.45 * for first $500,000 plus $4.75 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof to and including $1,000, 000 1,00,001 and up $5,889.20 * for first $1,000,000 plus $3.85 for each additional $1,000 or fraction thereof of permit fee Plan check 70% 625 625.04 Subd. 2 Other Permit Related $49.00 per hour or the total hourly cost to Fees City, whichever is greatest. (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved) 716 716.02 Recycling Service: $4.90 Per Quarter — Single Family $4.90 Per Quarter — Double Bungalow $4.10 Per Quarter — Apartments /Condos (2 -8 units) 721 721.03 Subd. 1 Food Establishment $575.00 High risk food $365.00 Medium risk food $105.00 Low risk food $130.00 Base Fee $55.00 Beer or wine table service $125.00 Alcohol bar service $135.00 Additional facility 721 721.03 Subd. 1 Minimum Restaurant $95.00 Plan Review Fee 735 735.03 Lodging Establishment: $7.00 per room Supervised Group Home: $45.00 Boarding and Lodging House License: $100.00 740 740.04 Multiple Dwelling Parking Garage $80.00 per garage Inspection Fee 830 830.05 Subd. 2 Other Permit Related $49.00 per hour or the total hourly cost to Fees City, whichever is greatest. (includes supervision, overhead, equipment, hourly wages and fringe benefits of employees involved 900 900.07 Subd. 1 Liquor License Fees $608.00 3.2 Beer License Off or On Sale (per year) $82.00 Per event- Temporary On -sale 3.2 Malt Liquor 1105 1105.01 Subd. 1 Service Availability $1,825.00 Per SAC unit X number of SAC units Charge (SAC) computed pursuant to Subsection. 1105.0 1, Subd, 1 of this code 1341 1341.05 Physical Culture & $286.00 Business License Health Service or. Club, Reducing Club or Salon, Sauna Parlor, Massage Parlor or Escort Service License 1350 1350.06 Subd. 1 Commercial $30.00 Manager Permit — Still Photography Photography $120.00 Manager Permit — Motion Photography $340.00 Council Permit 1400 1400.12 Truck Restrictive $100.00 Road Permit Section 2. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be January 1, 2008. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra Mangen -City Clerk James B. Hovland -Mayor REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # VLE From: John Wallin Consent ❑ Finance Director Information Only ❑ Date: December 18, 2007 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Utility Fees and Charges Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ® Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Approve Utility Fees Ordinance 2007 -20. Info /Background: Attached are the following schedules for Utility fees and charges proposed for 2008. 1) Schedule of General code Provisions and Administration 185.01- Schedule A 2) Ordinance No. 2007 -20 amending Code Section 185 Increasing Utility Fees. 3) Utility Rate Study by Ehlers & Associates. City of Edina SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A Proposed 2007 2008 AMOUNT DEPT REV 716 716.02 Subd. 2 Recycling Single Family 4.80 4.90 Per quarter Health 4640 Double Bungalow 4.80 4.90 Per quarter Health 4640 Apts Condos 2 - 8 Units 4.00 4.10 Per quarter Health 4640 1100 1100.03 Subd. 2 Sewer Service Charge: Based upon water usage during winter quarter. (November 1 to March 1) Single Family Dwellings, Townhouses, Two - Family Dwellings, Apartment Buildings Containing Four or Less 39.20 40.96 Per quarter up to and including 1600 cubic feet Finance 4641 Dwelling Units: 2.45 2.56 Additional from 1601 cubic feet and over Finance 4641 Apartment Buildings with More Than 35.28 36.86 Per quarter for each unit over four or Finance 4641 Four Dwelling Units: 2.45 2.56 per 100 cubic feet of water used during the quarter, whichever is greater Finance 4641 Commercial and Industrial Buildings, 39.20 40.96 Per water meter or approved sewage metering device on premises, or Finance 4641 Including Schools and Churches: 2.45 2.56 per 100 cubic feet of water used during the quarter, whichever is greater Finance 4641 1100 1100.03 Subd. 3 Industrial User Extra Strength Charges As allocated to City by Met Council Environmental Services Finance 4641 1100 1100.03 Subd. 4.A Shutting Off or Turning On Curb Water 25.00 25.00 For each turn -on and each shut -off. Finance 4628 Stops at Customer's Request or Due to Non - payment of Bill 1100 1100.04 Subd. 1.0 Issuance of Water Meter Cost of water meter, plus handling charges Finance 4627 1100 1100.03 Subd. 2 Water Service 1. Per 100 cubic feet for areas of City, except as described in #2 below 0.93 0.99 Up to 3500 cubic feet Finance 4626 1.23 1.31 From 3600 cubic feet to 6500 cubic feet Finance 4626 1.93 2.05 Over 6500 cubic feet Finance 4626 2.78 2.86 2. Per 100 cubic feet - Morningside area and for east side of Beard Finance 4626 Ave. from West 54th to Fuller St. and both sides of Abbott PI. from West 54th St. to Beard Ave. Domestic accounts used by: Commercial and Industrial Buildings, 0.93 0.99 Up to 3500 cubic feet Finance 4627 Including Schools and Churches: 1.23 1.31 Over 3500 cubic feet Finance 4627 Lawn watering accounts used by: Commercial and Industrial Buildings, 1.23 1.31 Up to 3500 cubic feet Finance 4627 Including Schools and Churches: 1.93 2.05 Over 3500 cubic feet Finance 4627 Meter Charge: 11.29 12.01 Per quarter for up to 3/4 inch meter Finance 4627 15.38 16.36 Per quarter for 1 inch meter Finance 4627 17.54 18.66 Per quarter for 1 1/4 inch meter Finance 4627 19.73 21.00 Per quarter for 1 1/2 inch meter Finance 4627 31.78 33.81 Per quarter for 2 inch meter Finance 4627 120.68 128.40 Per quarter for 3 inch meter Finance 4627 153.60 163.44 Per quarter for 4 inch meter Finance 4627 Flat Annual Charges as Follows: 0.00 0.00 Park Department for water used for sprinkling and skating rinks Finance 4626 0.00 0.00 Street Department for water used for flushing street 1110 1110.03 Storm Water Drainage Charge 14.39 15.54 Per quarter pursuant to formula in Subsection 1110.03 Finance 4642 SCHEDULE2 ORDINANCE NO. 2007-20 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: City of Edina Section 1. The following described fees of Schedule A to Code Section 185 are amended to read as follows: City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379 PURPOSE OF SECTION SUBSECTION FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT 1100 1100.03 Subd. Sewer Service: 2 1. Single Family, Town Houses, To and including 1600 cubic feet Two - Family Dwellings, $40.96 /quarter from 1601 c.f. & Apartment building with four or over $2.56/100 c.f less dwelling units 2. Apartment building with more $36.86 /quarter or $2.56 per 100 c.f than four dwelling units. whichever is greater 3. Commercial and industrial $40.96 /quarter /meter or $2.56 per buildings, including schools and 100 c.f. whichever is greater churches 1100 1100.03 Sub. 2 Water Service: 1. Per 100 cubic feet for areas of $0.99 up to 3500 c.f. City, except areas described in #2 $1.31 3600 to 6500 c.f. below: $2.05 over 6500 c.f. 2. For Morningside area and for $2.86/100 c.f. east side of Beard Av. from W. 54th St. to Fuller St. and both sides of Abbott Pl. from W 54th St. to Beard Av. 3. Domestic accounts used by $0.99 Up to 3500 cubic feet commercial and industrial $1.31 Over 3500 cubic feet buildings, including schools and churches. 4. Lawn watering accounts used by $1.31 Up to 3500 cubic feet commercial and industrial $2.05 Over 3500 cubic feet buildings, including schools and churches. 5. Meter charge $12.01 /quarter for up to 3/4 inch meter $16.36 /quarter for 1 inch meter $18.66 /quarter for 1 1/4 inch meter $21.00 /quarter for 1 %2 inch meter $33.81 /quarter for 2 inch meter $128.40 /quarter for 3 inch meter $163.44 /quarter for 4 inch meter_ 1110 1110.03 Storm Water Drainage Charge $15.54 per quarter pursuant to formula in Subsection 110.03 City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379 Section 2. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be January 1, 2008. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor City of Edina, Minnesota Water, Storm Water &Sewer Utility Rate Study 2008 Update December 13, 2007 Prepared By: EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 3060 Centre Pointe Drive Roseville, MN 55113 (651) 697 -8500 Introduction The City of Edina requested that Ehlers & Associates update the rate study of its water, storm water, and sanitary sewer system utilities initially completed in January of 2007. The purpose of the rate study is to ensure that: 1 Rates are sufficient to pay for the ongoing operations and capital improvements, and to maintain adequate cash balances; and, 2. The rate structure distributes the costs of operating the system across utility users consistent with the policy objectives of the Council. Background The need to reinvest in the City's aging utility systems has placed new financial stresses on the utility fund, particularly related to water. The City's recent and projected investments for replacing and improving the water and sewer systems are significant. Between 2004 and 2006, the City spent over $15 million on capital improvements in the utility fund. The City financed just over half of these costs and paid cash for the remainder, resulting in an expected 2007 year- end deficit in the combined utility fund. Faced with increasing capital costs, the City increased user rates in 2006 and 2007. In addition, in 2007 the City modified water rates to add usage tiers. The usage tiers charge higher water rates at higher levels of consumption. The rationale for a tiered rate structure was three -fold: 1. A tiered rate structure may promote water conservation and is encouraged by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 2. By charging more for water used on the lawn than water used in the home, the City is ensuring that essential water use remains as affordable as possible. 3. Cities construct water systems to meet the capacity of peak watering days in the summer. In Edina, the peak summer demand is approximately three times the average daily winter demand. A tiered rate system charges more per gallon for peak use, thereby allocating the cost of "oversizing" the system for peak days to the peak users. The purpose of this update is to determine how rates will need to be adjusted for 2008 and beyond to keep the utilities financially self - sufficient. Assumptions This study incorporates the proposed 2008 -2012 capital improvement plan for the utilities, and the city engineer's estimates of future capital costs from 2013 to 2020. The proposed capital improvement plans for water and sewer include the following improvements: • Sewer and water main replacement in the Country Club area • New and rehabilitated wells 3060 Centre Pointe Drive (651) 697 -8546 Fax: (651) 697 -8555 Roseville, MN 55113 -1105 jcook@ehlers- inc.com http: / /www.ehlers- inc.com • New water treatment plants No. 5 and No. 6 • Morningside watermain lining • Water tower painting • Lift station rehabilitation • Storm water pipe and grading improvements • Vehicles and equipment It should be noted that the City currently has one accounting fund for water, sanitary sewer, storm water, and recycling. For this analysis, we segregated the revenues and expenses for each utility, and treated each as a separate fund. By doing so, we can ensure that each utility will "pay its own way." Municipal utility funds are considered "enterprise funds," meaning they are intended to be operated as a private enterprise in which the fee revenue pays for all expenses. For purposes of this study, we refer to each segregated utility as its own fund. Following is a chart that summarizes the significant assumptions in the rate study. 3060 Centre Pointe Drive (651) 697 -8546 Fax: (651) 697 -8555 Roseville, MN 55113 -1105 jcook @ehlers- inc.com http: / /www.ehiers- inc.com 2 Assumption Growth and • No new connections. Utility Usage • Water usage will continue at 2005 (non - drought) levels. • Sewer usage will remain constant. Operating • City expenses increase 3% annually Expenses • MCES sanitary sewer disposal fees increase 5.5% annually Capital Water: Averages $4.5 million per year for the next six years; averages $3.0 Expenses million per year in 2014 and thereafter. Sanitary Sewer: Averages $1.9 million per year. Storm Water: Averages $2.15 million per year. Average capital costs are in today's dollars. Costs of improvements are inflated 4% per year in the rate study. Rate Structure No change proposed to 2007 rate structure. • Water has quarterly fixed charge and usage fee (see below) • Sewer billed based on winter quarter water consumption. • Storm water is fixed quarterly charge based on property use. 3060 Centre Pointe Drive (651) 697 -8546 Fax: (651) 697 -8555 Roseville, MN 55113 -1105 jcook @ehlers- inc.com http: / /www.ehiers- inc.com 2 Water Utility Water Fees There are two primary components to the City's water utility revenues: Meter Charges are a fixed quarterly fee based on the size of meter in the home or business. The meter charge is established to recover certain fixed expenses, such as the billing system, that the City must incur for a customer regardless of the amount of water consumed. The meter charge varies with meter size, and is proposed to increase 6.4% in 2008. Usage Fees are based on the metered use of water. Beginning in 2007 the City instituted a tiered rate system, as discussed above. Morningside area residents obtain their water from the City of Minneapolis. The City of Edina charges Momingside residents a meter fee and $.02 per 100 cubic feet. The usage rate for Morningside users is currently $2.78 per unit and is expected to increase to $2.86 in 2008. 99.3% of the usage fees are remitted directly to Minneapolis. Proposed Residential Water Rates Projected rate increases for residential users are shown in the following chart. These are consistent with the rates proposed in the January, 2007 rate study. Rate Increase 8.14% 6.40'/. 6.40'/. 6.40°/. 6.40'/. 6.40'/. 6.40'/. 6.40'/. 6.40'/. 6.4 0.35 units $0.93 $0.99 $1.05 $1.12 $1.19 $1.27 $1.35 $1.44 $1.53 $1 Rate in -crease 43.02% 6.40°/. 6.40'/. 6.40% 6.40°/. 4.40% 6.40% 6.40°/. 6.40% 6.4 3665 units $1.23 $1.31 $1.39 $1.48 $1.58 $1.68 $1.78 $1.90 $2.02 - $7 Sprinkler Meters Water connections used solely for sprinklers are charged at the middle tier rate of $1.23 per unit for 0 -65 units per quarter, and $1.93 for each unit over 65 units. The proposed rate increases are $1.31 and $2.05, respectively. Commercial Customers Commercial customers are charged on the first two tiers. Water consumption of 0 -35 units is $.93 per unit, and all water consumption over 35 units is $1.23 per unit. The proposed 2008 rates are $.99 and $1.31 respectively. ,p 3060 Centre Pointe Drive (651) 697 -8546 Fax: (651) 697 -8555 Roseville, MN 55113 -1105 jcook@ehlers-inc.com http: / /v^m.ehlers- inc.com 3 Water Connection Fees The City of Edina charges $2,000 per residential equivalency unit for new development. These connection fees will help pay for the capital costs of serving the new properties. To be conservative, the financial analysis does not count on any development related connection fee revenue for 2008 and beyond. We would recommend that the City increase its connections fees annual by an inflationary factor. Cash Balances and Prudent Use of Debt Cash balances are available to accommodate fluctuations in revenue depending on weather, and to fund unexpected repairs and a portion of capital improvements. In the short-term, the City is targeting a minimum cash balance of $2,000,000. Over the long term, the City's goal is maintain a cash balance equal to 50% of operating revenues. In order to return to a positive cash position and achieve the target cash level over the long term, the City will need to finance future capital improvements. The City is considering over $15 million in capital costs for the water system over the next three years and it is not feasible to utilize cash balances for this level of improvements. Capital projects financed with debt are amortized over a ten -year period and interest rates are estimated based on a spread over current market conditions. The graph on the following page portrays the projected cash balances based on the stated assumptions and proposed capital expenditures. The proposed rate increases and use of debt financing should be adequate to maintain a minimum cash balance and achieve the target cash balance after 2020, when the debt for the Country Club and water treatment improvements has been retired. It is unrealistic to expect ratepayers to fund the level of proposed improvements and fully fund depreciation at the same time. By keeping the term of the debt to ten years, the City will be able to: 1) Protect its bond rating; and 2) Allow time after the debt is retired to fund replacement reserves and reduce reliance on debt in the future. -- ... ...... -- - ------ - - _ --- ... ------------------ - - - - -- - - - - -- -- -- - - - - -- ------- - ----- - -- -- -- - --------- ---------- - ..-- - - - - -- -- ------- - - -..J 3060 Centre Pointe Drive (651) 697 -8546 Fax: (651) 697 -8555 Roseville, MN 55113 -1105 jcook@ehlers- inc.com http: / /www.ehlers- inc.com 4 2008 cash includes bond proceeds for 2009 projects City of Edina Water Utility Projected Cash (Balances $8,000,000 Ending cash $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 i. o v a CO v in cc n CO rn t Long-term Target Cash $0 Balance (50% or ($2,000,000) operating revenues) ($4,000,000) 2008 cash includes bond proceeds for 2009 projects i. o v a CO v in cc n CO rn Recommendation for Water Fees Based on .the completed rate study, we would recommend: 1) The 2008 meter charges and usage water rates increase 6.4% over 2007, consistent with the previous rate analysis. 2) The City Council review and establish water rates on an annual basis. The analysis projects 6.4% annual water rate increases after 2009. 3060 Centre Pointe Drive (651) 697 -8546 Fax: (651) 697 -8555 Roseville, MN 55113 -1105 jcook@ehlers- inc.com http: / /www.ehlers- inc.com 5 Sanitary Sewer Utility Sewer Fees The City of Edina participates in the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) sanitary sewer system. The City is responsible for the sewer collection system within the City limits and then pays MCES disposal fees for treatment. The MCES disposal fees have increased 5 - 9% each of the last four years. The rate study anticipates that future increases for these fees will be 5.5 %, annually. The MCES disposal fees comprise almost 70% of the sewer utility's operating expenses. Another 5% of expenditures represent depreciation, while only 25% of operating expenditures are within the City's control. Sewer Rate Structure The 2007 rate structure is $2.45 per unit of sewer. One unit is 100 cubic feet or approximately 750 gallons. The sewer usage is assumed to be identical to water usage during the winter quarter when there is almost no outside water use (car washing, lawn sprinkling, swimming pool, etc.). There is a minimum quarterly fee, regardless of use, of $39.20 (16 units or 1600 cubic feet). The minimum charge helps pay for the fixed costs of the system. Proposed Sewer Rates The projected rate increase for sanitary sewer is 4.5% per year for the next ten years. We do not recommend changing the rate structure at this time. The unit charge and the minimum quarterly charge would both be increased by 4.5 %. The proposed rate per unit is in the chart below. Sanitary Sewer 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Rate per $2.34 $2.45 $2.56 $2.67 $2.79 $2.92 $3.05 $3.18 - $3.33 $3.48 $3.63 Unit Sanitary Sewer City Connection Fees The City charges a sewer connection fee for new users to "buy -in" to the system. Connection fees are paid at the time a builder or homeowner pulls a building permit. For growing communities connection fees often exceed $5,000 per single family home. In fully developed cities, connection fees are usually $2,500 or less. The 2007 connection fee in the City of Edina is $2,000 per residential equivalency unit. In addition, the City collects the MCES connection fee and remits it to the Metropolitan Council. The City sewer connection fees will help offset City sanitary sewer infrastructure costs associated with new development and redevelopment. To be conservative, the projections presented p - - - .. ....... - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- - - 3060 Centre Pointe Drive (651) 697 -8546 Fax: (651) 697 -8555 Roseville, MN 55113 -1105 jcook @ehlers - inc.com http: / /www.ehlers- inc.com 6 in the Appendices to the rate study do not consider the collection of any connection fee revenues for projects not already approved. We would recommend an annual inflationary increase to the connection fee. Cash Balances The target cash balance for the sewer fund equals 50% of sewer operating revenues. Cash balances are available to accommodate fluctuations in revenue, pay for new and unexpected regulatory requirements, to fund a portion of capital improvements, and to establish replacement reserves. The City anticipates roughly $5.5 million in capital expenditures for the sanitary sewer system in 2007 and 2008. This level of expenditures cannot be financed internally, given current cash levels and the goal of maintaining 50% operating reserves. The rate analysis assumes $4.2 million of the 2008 -2009 projects will be financed in 2008 over a ten -year period and interest rates are estimated based on a spread over current market conditions. Roughly 80% of the cost of future improvements are also anticipated to be financed. The graph below portrays the projected cash balances based on the stated assumptions and proposed capital expenditures. It can be seen that the proposed rate increases and use of debt financing should be adequate to achieve the target cash balance. City of Edina Sanitary Sewer Utility Projected Cash Balances 6,000,000 2008 cash includes 5,000,000 bond proceeds for Ending cash F009rojects p 4,000,000 3,000,000 - 1 Target Cash Balance 2,000,000 (50% of operating 1,000,000 revenues 0 LO to ti Co O O N M v LO co n Co rn O O O O O O - �- - N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N .. - - --- - ------ -_ - .....- -- °-- -- ---......-- - - ---- ---- - - - - --- -- - ---- - -- - ----- - - - - - - '-- -- . -- - - ......- ------- .------- ------ ... ... - --- - - -._.� 3060 Centre Pointe Drive (651) 697 -8546 Fax: (651) 697 -8555 Roseville, MN 55113 -1105 jcook ®ehiers- inc.com hq: / /www.eWers- inc.com 7 Recommendation for Sanitary Sewer Fees Based on the completed rate study, we would recommend that the City continue to increase sewer rates 4.5% per year, in order to meet the goals of funding capital improvements of the system and a 50% operating reserve balance. Storm Water Rates Over the next five years, the City anticipates approximately $10.7 million in capital costs to address storm water from drain tile systems, expand storm water ponds, rehabilitate lift stations and replace its aging storm water system. Storm water rates will need to be increased to fund the capital projects and maintain minimum cash reserves. The City's current quarterly storm water rate is $14.39 per quarter. The proposed rate increases in the chart below will allow the City to maintain and improve its storm water infrastructure, as well as sustaining adequate cash reserves. These rates are consistent with the rates proposed in the January, 2007 rate analysis, and are comparable with other fully developed metro area communities. Actual 2005 Actual 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 $6.74 $10.74 $14.39 $15.54 $16.79 $18.13 $19.58 $21.15 $22.84 $24.66 $26.64 Cities across the state will be facing pressure to generate more revenue to fund storm water systems. The Clean Water Legacy Act provided funding to test and develop plans for Minnesota's polluted waterways. These plans may result in new unfunded mandates for local governments. While the future requirements for managing the quality and quantity of storm water are unknown, the level of projected capital expenses in this study should pay for many of the mandated improvements. Our experience with other cities indicates that most have not yet planned for significant improvements to their storm water system, and their quarterly fees are established at a level that will only pay for the annual operations and maintenance of the storm water system. As more cities undertake planning for capital improvements to their storm water systems, we expect to see higher storm water utility fees across the metro area. - - - -- -- -- - -- - _ - - -- - - - -..t 3060 Centre Pointe Drive (651) 697 -8546 Fax: (651) 697 -8555 Roseville, MN 55113 -1105 jcook@ehlers- inc.com http: / /www.ehlers- inc.com Cash Balances The purpose of the cash balance is to allow the City to fund routine improvements on a "pay -as- you -go" basis, reserving the use of debt for major improvements, and have operating reserves available for cashflow purposes. It is our recommendation that the system be operated to maintain a minimum cash balance of $500,000. The projected cash balances, assuming the proposed rates above, are shown in the following graph. It should be noted that the large cash balance in 2008 is the result of bond proceeds which will be expended on 2009 capital projects. Sample Utility Bills The chart below shows the total utility bill for sample residents who use varying amounts of water. Because residents view their utilities together in one bill, we have included water, sanitary, and storm water charges, along with a cumulative total. 3060 Centre Pointe Drive (651) 697 -8546 Fax: (651) 697 -8555 Roseville, MN 55113 -1105 jcook ®ehlers- inc.com http: / /www.eWers- inc.com 9 City of Edina Sample Projected Residential Utility Bills Sample Family Quarterly E 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Winter months - 30 units water and sewer Sewer 70.20 73.36 76.66 80.11 ' 83.71 87.48 91.42 Water 36.40 39.19 41.70 44.37 47.21 50.23 53.44 Storm Water 10.74 14.39 15.54 16.79 18.13 19.58 21.15 Total $ 117.34 $126.94 $133.90 $141.26 $149.05 $157.29 $166.01 Combined Fee Increase Combined Fee Increase $ 9.60 $ 6.96 $ 7.36 $ 7.79 $ 8.24 $ 8.72 Percent Increase Percent Increase 8.2% 5.5% 5.5% 5.5% 5.5% 5.5% 5.9% Summer months - 50 units water and 30 units sewer Sewer 70.20 73.36 76.66 80.11 83.71 87.48 91.42 Water 53.60 62.29 66.28 70.52 75.03 79.83 84.94 Storm Water 10.74 14.39 15.54 16.79 18.13 19.58 21.15 Total $ 134.54 $150.04 $158.48 $167.41 $176.87 $186.89 $197.51 Combined Fee Increase $ 15.50 $ 8.44 $ 8.93 $ 9.46 $ 10.p2 $ 10.61 Percent Increase 11.5% 5.6% 5.6% 5.7% 5.7% 5.7% Sample Summer Quarterly 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 100 units water and 30 units sewer Sewer 70.20 73.36 76.66 80.11 83.71 87.48 91.42 Water 96.60. 148.29 157.78 167.88 178.62 190.05 202.22 Storm Water 10.74 14.39 15.54 16.79 18.13 19.58 21.15 Total $ 177.54 $ 236.04 $ 249.98 $ 264.77 $ 280.47 $ 297.11 $ 314.78 Combined Fee Increase $ 58.50 $ 13.94 $ 14.79 $ 15.69 $ 16.65 $ 17.67 Percent Increase 33.0% 5.9% 5.9% 5.9% 5.9% 5.9% Utility Rate Comparison The City of Edina has historically had relatively low utility rates. Rate increases that began in 2006 now make Edina comparable to many metro area communities. A comparison of a typical residential utility bill to other communities is in the following chart. Please note that the usage in the comparative chart below is lower than the three sample bills shown above. -1 3060 Centre Pointe Drive (651) 697 -8546 Fax: (651) 697 -8555 Roseville, MN 55113 -1105 jcook @ehlers - inc.com http: / /www.ehlers- inc.com 10 City of Edina 2007 Water Rate Comparison Based on Residential Service Assumes Quarterly use of 36 units water and 18 units sewer City Quarterly Water Quarterly Sewer Quarterly Storm Total Minnetonka 44.95 39.75 9.00 93.70 St. Louis Park 42.80 44.47 11.50 98.77 Richfield 56.43 34.56 9.90 100.89 Edina - 2007 45.07 44.10 14.39 103.56 Inver Grove Heights 69.66 38.23 10.00 107.89 (excludes Northwest Area) Edina - Proposed 2008 47.95 46.08 16.54 109.58 Bloomington 61.61 35.13 13.59 110.33 Chanhassen 56.65 58.86 7.80 123.31 Edina - Morningside -2007 1 93.961 46.08 10.74 150.78 Summary The City of Edina has managed its utility funds well, and as a result has been able to pay for improvements on a cash basis in the past. However, the need to reinvest in the water and sewer utility system over the next several years has put new financial pressures on all of the utility funds. The rate study indicates .that rate increases are necessary in 2008 to rebuild cash balances and pay for capital improvements. Modest and steady annual rate increases will be needed for water, sanitary sewer, and storm water utilities to pay for City operating costs and capital improvements. While this analysis proposes the use of debt to allow for steady and predictable rate increases,, it is not a debt plan. The City should review whether it has sufficient cash to pay for capital improvements prior to issuing debt. At its option, the City may accumulate less cash in its utility funds (thereby funding less depreciation) in order to reduce the amount of new debt issued for utility improvements. As with all other bonding decisions, the City's decisiorl to-issue debt for any given improvement will be based on many factors, including the City's cash balances, rating, and other financing needs. A -- - - - - -- - - -- -- - - - - -- - - - - - -- -- - -- - - --- -- --- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- ----- -- - - - -- -- - -- - - - - -- - - - - - - -- - - - -- ------- 3060 Centre Pointe Drive Roseville, NN 55113 -1105 11 (651) 697 -8546 Fax: (651) 697-8555 jcook @ehlers - inc.com http: / /www.ehlers- inc.com Appendices to this report follow: Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Water Utility Projections Sanitary Sewer Utility Projections Storm Water Utility Projections -- - - - - -- ----- - ------- --- ------------------- --- ------- - - ---------- ---------- --------- --- -- --------- - ---- - - - - -- - -- - - - - -t 3060 Centre Pointe Drive (651) 697-8546 Fax: (651) 697-8555 Roseville, MN 55113-1105 jcook@ehlers-ine.com http://www.eWers-inc.com 12 City of Edina Utility Funds Water Fund Other revenue increase Expenditure increase Investment Earnings Revenues 3.00% 3.009/6 3.001/6 3.001/6 3.00°/6 Water 3.00% 3.001/6 3.009/6 3.001/6 3.00°/6 3.009% 30M. 3.009/6 3.00% 3.00% 3.00°/6 3.001/6 3.00% 3.00. 3.001/6 3.001% 3.001/6 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.009/6 Appendix A 3.001/6 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.0(P/6 3.001/6 3.001% 3.00% 3.00% Financial Stater. Estimated Projected - 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 3 4 Quarterly Meter Service Charges 800,985 852,248 906,792 964,826 1,026,575 1,092,276 1,162,182 1,236,561 015,701 1,399,906 1,489,500 5 Charges for Water Usage 4,317,103 4,570,157 4,839,406 5,125,888 5,430,704 5,755,028 6,100,110 6,467,276 6,857,941 7,273,609 7,715,879 6 7 Water Access Charge Water Testing 8117 86,226 88,813 91,477 94,212 97,048 99,960 102,959 106,047 109,229 112,506 115,881 119,357 8 Other 69,614 26,579 27,376 28,198 29,044 29,915 30,812 31,737 32,689 33,669 34,680 35,720 36,791 I0 Total operating revenues 4,068,754 44 5,090,4 5,234,277 5,542,080 5,869,463 6,217,677 6,588,051 6,982,000 7,401,028 7,846,736 8,320,826 8,825,116 9,361,526 II 12 13 Expenses 14 15 Admin. 480,948 487,332 501,952 517,011 532,521 548,497 564,952 581,900 599,357 617,338 675,858 654,934 674,582 16 17 Buildings Water Distribution 1,746,996 1,590,549 0 1,638,265 0 1,687,413 0 1,738,036 0 1,790,177 0 1,843,882 0 1,899,198 0 1,956,174 0 2,014,860 0 2,075,305 0 2,137,564 0 2,201,691 18 19 Tanks, Towers, and Reservoirs Source of Supply 262,124 292,561 0 301,338 0 310,378 0 319,690 0 329,280 0. 339,159 0 378,334 0 389,684 0 401,374 0 413,415 0 425,818 0 438,592 20 Water Treatment 358,838 502,162 517,226 532,743 548,726 565,187 582,143 599,607 617,595 636,123 655,207 674,863 695,109 0 _ 1 Meter Reading 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .2 Meter Repair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 Equip Operation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 25 Training Depreciation 668,797 668,808 802,149 929,961 1,084,294 1,160,108 1,319,010 1,474,038 1,597,215 1,727,245 1,864,461 2,009,210 2,161,853 26 _27 Total operating expense 3,517,702 3,541,412 3,760,931 3,977,506 4,223,266 4,393,249 4,649,145 4,933,077 5,160,025 5,396,940 5,644,247 5,902,389 6,171,828 28 29 Operating incomeposs) 551,052 1,549,032 1,473,346 1,564,574 1,646,197 1,824,428 1,93 8,906 2,048,923 2, 241,002 2,449,796 2,676,581 2,922,727 3,189,700 30 32 33 Cash Bow Operating income (loss) 551,052 1,514,097 1,473,346 1,564,574 1,646,197 1,824,428 1,938,906 2,048,923 2,241,002 2,449,796 2,676,581 2,922,727 3,189,700 3.1 Depreciation 668,797 668,808 802,149 929,961 1,084,294 1,160,108 1,319,010 1,474,038 1,597,215 1,727,245 1,864,461 2,009,210 2,161,853 35 Other changes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 Gain (loss) on disposal of assets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 38 Intergovernmental Bond payments an existing debt 0 (182,328) (184,935) 0 (610,866) 0 (553,463) 0 (553,303) (554,770) (560,078) (556,868) (367,800) (364,800) (366,300) (367,200) 0 ;c) Miscellanous income 0 50,390 11,500 0 50,544 0 184,084 0 61,148 0 60,577 0 61,477 0 66,719 0 71,500 0 77,916 0 78,820 0 73,882 0 64,457 40 Investment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 Transfers 0 0 42 43 Capital _ (5,774,240) (1,074,468) (5,663,840) (5,187,354) (6,321,736) (2,164,238) (6,204,930) (5,772,891) (3,947,795) (4,105,707) (4,269,935) (4,440,773) (4,618,762] 44 Prepared by Elders and Associates, Inc. 12f122007 2008 Update (12.04) Water City of Edina Utility Funds Water Fund Appendix A Other revenue increase 3.001A 3.005A 3.00°/. 3.001/6 3.00°/ 3.00% 3.00°/6 3.009/6 3.001% 3.009/6 3.009/6 300°/ Expenditure increase 3.00% 3.00°/6 3.00°/6 3.00°% 300% 3.00"A 3.00°/6 3.001/6 3.00% 3.00°/6 3.009/4 3.00°/. Investment Earnings 3.001 /6 3.00% 3.006 /6 3.00% 3.006/6 3.006% 3.004'6 3.006/6 3.006% 3.009A 3.006/6 Prepared by Elvers and Associates. Inc 121122007 2008 Update (12.04) Financial Staten Estimated 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Protected 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 45 Bond Proceeds 3,062,766 8,400,000 5,100,000 1,400,000 5,500,000 5,500,000 3,950,000 4,100,000 4,250,000 4,450,000 4,600,000 46 Bonds: 47 Debt (M) -2008 Bonds (4.01/6 for 10 years) (1,035,644) (1,035,644) (1,035,644) (1,035,644) (1,035,644) (1,035,644) (1,035,644) (1,035,644) (1,035,644) (1,035,644) 48 Debt (M) - 2009 Bonds 49 Debt (M) - 2010 Bonds (5.06/6 for 10 years) (5.01/6 for 10 years) 0 0 (660,473) 0 (660,473) 0 (660,473) 0 (660,473) 0 (660,473) 0 (660,473) 0 (660,473) 0 (660,473) 50 Debt (M) -2011 Bonds (5.251/1 for 10 years) (183,514) (183,514) (183,514) (183,514) (183,514) (183,514) (183,514) 51 Debt (M) - 2012 Bonds (5.25% for 10 years) (720,948) (720,948) (720,948) (720,948) (720,948) (720,948) 52 Debt (M) -2013 Bonds (5.5 % for 10 years) (729,673) (729,673) (729,673) (729,673) (729,673) 53 Debt (M) - 2014 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) (524,038) (524,038) (524,038) (574,038) 5.1 Debt (P&1) - 2015 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) (543,938) (543,938) (563,838) (543,938) (563,838) 55 Debt (M) - 2016 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) (590,372) 56 Debt (M) - 2017 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) 57 Debt (M) - 2018 Bonds (5.51/1 for 10 years) 58 Debt (M) - 2019 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) 59 Debt (Mr) - 2020 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) 60 Debt (M) -2021 Bonds (5.51/6 for 10 years) 61 Debt (M) - 2022 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) 62 . Debt (M) - 2020 Bonds (5.51/1 for 10 years) 63 Net Casbllow (4,686328) 3,997,768 4,451333 (4497$12) (19,042) 29,988 174,754 159,341 213,869 30,159 (164,601) (314,180) (154,789) 64 65 Beginning cash 2,373,351 (2,312,977) 1,684,790 6,136,123 2,038,281 2,019,239 2,049,227 2323,981 2,383,322 2,597,191 2,627,350 2,462,749 2,148,569 66 67 Ending cash 2312977 1,684,790 6,136,123 2,038,281 2,019,239 2,049,227 2,223,981 2,333,322 2397,191 2,627350 2 /662,749 2,148369 1,993,780 68 69 70 Target cash balance (50%ofoperatingrevenues) 2,545,222 2,617,138 2,771,040 2,934,732 3,108,839 3,294,026 3,491,000 3,700,514 3,923,368 4,160,414 4,412,558 4,680,764 71 72 Actual cash over (under) minumum cash balance (860,432) 3,518,985 (732,759) (915,493) '(1,059,612) (1,070,045) (1,107,678) (1,103,323) (1,296,018) (1,697,665) (2,263,989) (2,686,984) Prepared by Elvers and Associates. Inc 121122007 2008 Update (12.04) City of Edina Sanitary Sewer Appendix B Sewer Utility Sanitary Sewer Charges Increase Investment Rate Other revenue increase MCES Disposal Cost Increase Expenditure increase 1 Revenues 3 Sewer Charges 4 City SAC 5 Other 6 7 Total operating revenues 8 9 Expenses IO 11 Disposal Charges 12 Admin. 13 Pumping & Lift Stations 14 Buildings 15 Meter Reading 16 Meter Repair 17 Equip Operation 13 Training 19 Sewer Cleaning 20 Lift Station Maint 21 Misc Treatment 22_ Collection Systems '__; Depreciation 74 25 Total operating expense 26 27 Operating income (loss) 4.50% 4.50% 4.50 % 4.500/6 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 2006 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% Financial Stateme Estimated Projected 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 5,638,596 5,892,333 6,157,488 6,434,575 6,724,131 7,026,717 7,342,919 7,673,350 8,018,651 8,379,490 8,756,567 69,614 26,579 27,376 28,198 29,044 29,915 30,812 31,737 32,689 33,669 34,680 5,708,210 5,918,912- 6,184,864 6,462,772 6,753,174 7,056,631. 7,373,731 7,705,087 8,051,340 8,413,160 8,791,247 3,442,190 3,948,870 4,067,336 4,189,356 4,315,037 4,444,488 4,577,823 4,715,158 4,856,612 4,577,823 4,715,158 480,948 487,332 501,952 517,011 532,521 548,497 564,952 581,900 599,357 564,952 581,900 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 311,371 429,674 453,306 478,237 504,540 532,290 561,566 592,452 625,037 659,414 695,682 334,398 334,404 375,566 470,833 484,958 534,507 550,542 602,058 658,120 715,864 783,340 4,568,907 5,200,280 5,398,160 5,655,438 5,837,057 6,059,782 6,254,883 6,491,568 6,739,127 6,518,052 6,776,079 1,139 ,304 718,632 786,704 807,335 916,117 996,849 1,118,848 1,213,518 1,312,213 1,895,107 2,015,167 Prepared by Ehlers and Associates, Inc. 12/12/2007 N:Winnsota%EDINA1Utility Rate Study12008 Update%2008 Update (12.04) City of Edina Sanitary Sewer Appendix B Sewer Utility Sanitary Sewer Charges Increase Investment Rate Other revenue increase MCES Disposal Cost Increase Expenditure increase 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 1,139,304 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% Financial Stateme Estimated Projected 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 28 807,335 916,117 996,849 29 Cash flow 1,312,213 1,895,107 30 Operating income (loss) 1,139,304 718,632 31 Depreciation 334,398 334,404 32 Other changes (314,700) (317,810) .,3 Gain (loss) on disposal of assets 34 Intergovernmental 35 Bond payments: 1999A (316,710) (315,900) 36 Bond payments: 2003C (182,328) (184,935) 37 Bond Payments: 2007B (183,600) (188,200) 38 Miscellanous 0 0 39 Investment income 50,390 11,500 40 Transfers 0 0 41 Met Councill &I Surcharge (115,000) (130,000) 42 Met Council I &I Surcharge Rebate (50 %) 57,500 43 Capital (619,636) (886,1261 44 71,962 86,008 45 Bond proceeds 115,566 1,556,501 46 Bonds: (130,000) (130,000) 47 Debt (P &I) - 2008 Bonds (4.00% for 10 years) 48 Debt (P &I) - 2009 Bonds (5.0% for 10 years) 0 49 Debt (P &I) - 2010 Bonds (5.00% for 10 years) 50 Debt (P &I) - 2011 Bonds (5.25% for 10 years) (3,258,320) 51 Debt (P &I) - 2012 Bonds (5.25% for 10 years) (2,189,975) 52 Debt (P &I) - 2013 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) (2.686,928) 53 Debt (P &I) - 2014 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) 54 Debt (P &I) - 2015 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) 2,300,000 55 Debt (P &I) - 2016 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) (517,822) 56 Debt (P &I) - 2017 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) (517,822) 57 Debt (P &I) - 2018 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) 61 Cash flow 290,420 1,161,575 62 0 0 63 Beginning cash 2,373,351 2,663,770 64 65 Ending cash 2,663 770 3,825,345 66 67 Target Cash Balance (50% of 2,854,105 2,959,456 68 0 69 Actual cash over (under) minumum cash balam 865,889 786,704 807,335 916,117 996,849 1,118,848 1,213,518 1,312,213 1,895,107 2,015,167 375,566 470,833 484,958 534,507 550,542 602,058 658,120 715,864 783,340 (314,700) (317,810) (186,860) (188,063) (188,503) (190,970) (192,778) (191,568) (215,639) (183,600) (188,200) (187,500) (186,600) (185,500) (184,200) (187,600) (185,700) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 114,760 159,806 95,464 104,478 99,356 109,968 115,566 121,698 126,429 71,962 86,008 86,578 103,401 115,566 121,698 126,429 (130,000) (130,000) (130,000) 0 65,000 65,000 65,000 (3,258,320) (2,245,402) (2,058,501) (701,915) (2,189,975) (2,388,669) (2,484,216) (2,583,585) (2.686,928) 4,200,000 .1,750,000 1,750,000 1,900,000 1,900,000 2,300,000 2,300,000 (517,822) (517,822) (517,822) (517,822) (517,822) (517,822) (517,822) (517,822) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (229,393) (229,393) (229,393) (229,393) (229,393) (229,393) 0 0 0 0 0 (229,393) (229.393) (229,393) (229,393) (252,069) (252,069) (252,069) (252,069) (252,069) (305,136) 1,501,512 (2,144,723) - 300,476 (170,757) 353,757 186,602 204,374 902,437 692,856 3,825,345 5,326,857 3,182,134 3,482,610 3,311,853 3,665,610 3,852,212 3,311,853 3,665,610 5,326,857 3,182,134 3,482,610 3,311,853 3,665,610 3,852,212 4,056,585 4,214,289 4,358,465 3,092,432 3,231,386 3,376,587 3,528,316 3,686,866 3,852,543 4,025,670 4,206,580 4,395,623 2,234,425 (49,252) 106,023 (216,463) (21,256) (332) 30,915 7,710 (37,158) Prepared by Ehlers and Associates, Inc. 12/12/2007 N:WinnsotalEDINA \Utility Rate Study=08 Update%2008 Update (12.04) Storm Sewer City of Edina Storm Sewer Fund For Discussion Only A Storm Sewer Revenue Increase 34.00% 8.00% 8.00% 8.00% 8.00% 8.00% 8.00% 8.00% 8.00% 8.00% 8.00% Other revenue increase 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% Investment Rate 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% Expenditure increase 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% Per Financial Statements Estimated Projected 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 1 Revenues 2 3 Charges for services 824,068 1,242,082 1,556,429 1,680,944 1,815,419 1,960,653 2,117,505 2,286,905 2,469,858 2,667,446 2,880,842 3,111,310 3,360,214 4 Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Total operating revenues 824,068 1,242,082 1,556,429 1,680,944 1,815,419 1,960,653 2,117,505 2,286,905 2,469,858 2,667,446 2,880,842 3,111,310 3,360,214 7 8 Expenses 9 Operating Expenses 208,211 195,196 195,874 201,750 207,802 214,036 220,458 227,071 233,883 240,900 248,127 255,571 263,238 10 Depreciation 291,568 334,398 334,404 391,600 450,073 503,598 571,584 646,461 720,714 799,389 882,707 970,897 1,064,201 11 Total operating expense 499,779 529,595 530,278 593,350 657,876 717,635 792,041 873,533 954,598 1,040,289 1,130,834 1,226,468 1,327,439 12 13 Operating income (loss) 324,289 712,488 1,026,152 1,087,594 1,157,544 1,243,018 1,325,464 1,413,373 1,515,260 1,627,157 1,750,009 1,884,842 2,032,775 14 Cash flow 15 Operating income (loss) 324,289 712,488 1,026,152 1,087,594 1,157,544 1,243,018 1,325,464 1,413,373 1,515,260 1,627,157 1,750,009 1,884,842 2,032,775 16 Depreciation 291,568 334,398 334,404 391,600 450,073 503,598 571,584 646,461 720,714 799,389 882,707 970,897 1,064,201 17 Other changes (3,421) 18 Intergovernmental 4,246 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 Interest income 0 0 0 47,440 78,622 32,893 33,689 30,750 31,390 34,294 35,140 36,822 37,456 20 Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 21 Disposal of assets 0 4,553 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 Band proceeds 3,625,043 2,500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 1,900,000 1,900,000 2,000,000 2,200,000 2,350,000 2,500,000 23 Debt payments: 1999 bonds (121,995) (123,145) (123,945) (124,545) (119,830) 24 Debt payments: 2007 bonds (504,474) (434,600) (432,000) (433,900) (435,200) (431,000) (431,300) (431,000) (430,100) (433,500) 25 Debt (P&I) - 2008 Bonds (4.75% for 10 years) (319,842) (319,842) (319,842) (319,842) (319,842) (319,842) (319,842) (319,842) (319,842) 2G Debt (P &I) - 2009 Bonds (5.0% for 10 years) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 Debt (M) -2010 Bonds (5.25% for 10 years) (131,082) (131,082) (131,082) (131,082) (131,082) (131,082) (131,082) 28 Debt (P&I) - 2011 Bonds (5.25% for 10 years) ( 196,622) (196,622) ( 196,622) (196,622) (196,622) ( 196,622) 29 Debt (P&I) -2012 Bonds (5.25% for 10 years) (249,055) (249,055) (249,055) (249,055) (249,055) 30 Debt (P&I) - 2013 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) (252,069) (252,069) (252,069) (252,069) 31 Debt (P&I) - 2014 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) (265,336) (265,336) (265,336) 32 Debt (P&1) -2015 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) (291,869) (291,869) 33 Debt (P&I) - 2016 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) (311,769) 34 Debt (P&I) - 2017 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) 35 Debt (P&I) - 2018 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) 38 Capital (1,028,970) (805,948) (2,427,125) (2,358,200) (2,336,256) (2,001,133) (2,643,880) (2,886,509) (2,742,959) (2,852,677) (2,966,784) (3,085,455) (3,208,874) 39 40 Cash flow (534,283) 1221346 2,434,529 1_,039,414 (1,524,290) 26,534 (97,968) 21,329 %,805 28,194 56,066 219131 (25,585) 41 42 Beginning cash _ (441,275) (975,559) _ (853,212) 1,581,317 2,620,731 1,096,441 1,122,975 1,025,007 1,046,336 1,143,141 1,171,335 1,227,401 1,248,531 43 Ending cash (975,558) 853,212 1,581,317 2,620,731 1,096,441 1,122,975 1,025,007 1,046,336 1,143,141 1,171,335 1,227,401 1,248,531 1,222,946 44 _.._ __ - - - 45 Quarterly Charge for Single Family - -- -- --- 6.74 -- - - --- 10.74 ---- - - 14.39 -- - - -- ----__ 15.54 -.- -_ ., 16.79 - -- - - -- 18.13 - -- -- 19.58 - -- 21.1 S - - - - - - -- 22.84 - 24.6 - 26.64 28.77 -- 31,07 Prepare, lers and Associates, Inc. 12/12/2• 2008 Update (1' REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # VLE From: John Wallin Consent ❑ Finance Director Information Only ❑ Date: December 18, 2007 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Utility Fees and Charges Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Approve Utility Fees Ordinance 2007 -20. Info /Background: Attached are the following schedules for Utility fees and charges proposed for 2008. 1) Schedule of General code Provisions and Administration 185.01- Schedule A 2) Ordinance No. 2007 -20 amending Code Section 185 Increasing Utility Fees. 3) Utility Rate Study by Ehlers & Associates. City of Edina SECTION SUBSECTION PURPOSE OF FEE OR CHARGE General Code Provisions and Administration 185.01 - Schedule A Proposed 2007 2008 AMOUNT DEPT REV 716 716.02 Subd. 2 Recycling Single Family 4.80 4.90 Per quarter Health 4640 Double Bungalow 4.80 4.90 Per quarter Health 4640 Apts Condos 2 - 8 Units 4.00 4.10 Per quarter Health 4640 1100 1100.03 Subd. 2 Sewer Service Charge: Based upon water usage during winter quarter. (November 1 to March 1) Single Family Dwellings, Townhouses, Two - Family Dwellings, Apartment Buildings Containing Four or Less 39.20 40.96 Per quarter up to and including 1600 cubic feet Finance 4641 Dwelling Units: 2.45 2.56 Additional from 1601 cubic feet and over Finance 4641 Apartment Buildings with More Than 35.28 36.86 Per quarter for each unit over four or Finance 4641 Four Dwelling Units: 2.45 2.56 per 100 cubic feet of water used during the'quarter, whichever is greater Finance 4641 Commercial and Industrial Buildings, 39.20 40.96 Per water meter or approved sewage metering device on premises, or Finance 4641 Including Schools and Churches: 2.45 2.56 per 100 cubic feet of water used during the quarter, whichever is greater Finance 4641 1100 1100.03 Subd. 3 Industrial User Extra Strength Charges As allocated to City by Met Council Environmental Services Finance 4641 1100 1100.03 Subd. 4.A Shutting Off or Turning On Curb Water 25.00 25.00 For each turn -on and each shut -off. Finance 4628 Stops at Customer's Request or Due to Non - payment of Bill 1100 1100.04 Subd. 1.0 Issuance of Water Meter Cost of water meter, plus handling charges Finance 4627 1100 1100.03 Subd. 2 Water Service 1. Per 100 cubic feet for areas of City, except as described in #2 below 0.93 0.99 Up to 3500 cubic feet Finance 4626 1.23 1.31 From 3600 cubic feet to 6500 cubic feet Finance 4626 1.93 2.05 Over 6500 cubic feet Finance 4626 2.78 2.86 2. Per 100 cubic feet - Morningside area and for east side of Beard Finance 4626 Ave. from West 54th to Fuller St. and both sides of Abbott Pl. from West 54th St. to Beard Ave. Domestic accounts used by: Commercial and Industrial Buildings, 0.93 0.99 Up to 3500 cubic feet Finance 4627 Including Schools and Churches: 1.23 1.31 Over 3500 cubic feet Finance 4627 Lawn watering accounts used by: Commercial and Industrial Buildings, 1.23 1.31 Up to 3500 cubic feet Finance 4627 Including Schools and Churches: 1.93 2.05 Over 3500 cubic feet Finance 4627 Meter Charge: 11.29 12.01 Per quarter for up to 3/4 inch meter Finance 4627 15.38 16.36 Per quarter for 1 inch meter Finance 4627 17.54 18.66 Per quarter for 1 1/4 inch meter Finance 4627 19.73 21.00 Per quarter for 1 1/2 inch meter Finance 4627 31.78 33.81 Per quarter for 2 inch meter Finance 4627 120.68 128.40 Per quarter for 3 inch meter Finance 4627 153.60 163.44 Per quarter for 4 inch meter Finance 4627 Flat Annual Charges as Follows: 0.00 0.00 Park Department for water used for sprinkling and skating rinks Finance 4626 0.00 0.00 Street Department for water used for flushing street 1110 1110.03 Storm Water Drainage Charge 14.39 15.54 Per quarter pursuant to formula in Subsection 1110.03 Finance 4642 SCHEDULE 2 ORDINANCE NO. 2007-20 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: City of Edina Section 1. The following described fees of Schedule A to Code Section 185 are amended to read as follows: City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379 PURPOSE OF SECTION SUBSECTION FEE /CHARGE AMOUNT 1100 1100.03 Subd. Sewer Service: 2 1. Single Family, Town Houses, To and including 1600 cubic feet Two - Family Dwellings, $40.96 /quarter from 1601 c.f. & Apartment building with four or over $2.56/100 c.f. less dwelling units 2. Apartment building with more $36.86 /quarter or $2.56 per 100 c.f than four dwelling units. whichever is greater 3. Commercial and industrial $40.96 /quarter /meter or $2.56 per buildings, including schools and 100 c.ff, whichever is greater churches 1100 1100.03 Sub. 2 Water Service: 1. Per 100 cubic feet for areas of $0.99 up to 3500 c.f. City, except areas described in #2 $1.31 3600 to 6500 c.f. below: $2.05 over 6500 c.f. 2. For Morningside area and for $2.86/100 c.f. east side of Beard Av. from W. 54th St. to Fuller St. and both sides of Abbott Pl. from W 54h St. to Beard Av. 3. Domestic accounts used by $0.99 Up to 3500 cubic feet commercial and industrial $1.31 Over 3500 cubic feet buildings, including schools and churches. 4. Lawn watering accounts used by $1.31 Up to 3500 cubic feet commercial and industrial $2.05 Over 3500 cubic feet buildings, including schools and churches. 5. Meter charge $12.01 /quarter for up to % inch meter $16.36 /quarter for 1 inch meter $18.66 /quarter for 1 '/4 inch meter $21.00 /quarter for 1 '/z inch meter $33.81 /quarter for 2 inch meter $128.40 /quarter for 3 inch meter $163.44 /quarter for 4 inch meter_ 11.10 1110.03 Storm Water Drainage Charge $15.54 per quarter pursuant to formula in Subsection 110.03 City Hall (612) 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX (612) 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA 55424 -1394 TDD (612) 826 -0379 Section 2. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be January 1, 2008. ATTEST: City Clerk Mayor u • 1 1 r City of Edina, Minnesota o� Water, Storm Water &Sewer Utility Rate Study 2008 Update December 13, 2007 Prepared By: ° EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 3060 Centre Pointe Drive Roseville, MN 55113 (651) 697 -8500 Introduction The City of Edina requested that Ehlers & Associates update the rate study of its water, storm water, and sanitary sewer system utilities initially completed in January of 2007. The purpose of the rate study is to ensure that: 1. Rates are sufficient to pay for the ongoing operations and capital improvements, and to maintain adequate cash balances; and, 2. The rate structure distributes the costs of operating the system across utility users consistent with the policy objectives of the Council. Background The need to reinvest in the City's aging utility systems has placed new financial stresses on the utility fund, particularly related to water. The City's recent and projected investments for replacing and improving the water and sewer systems are significant. Between 2004 and 2006, the City spent over $15 million on capital improvements in the utility fund. The City financed just over half of these costs and paid cash for the remainder, resulting in an expected 2007 year- end deficit in the combined utility fund. Faced with increasing capital costs, the City increased user rates in 2006 and 2007. In addition, in 2007 the City modified water rates to add usage tiers. The usage tiers charge higher water rates at higher levels of consumption. The rationale for a tiered rate structure was three -fold: A tiered rate structure may promote water conservation and is encouraged by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 2. By charging more for water used on the lawn than water used in the home, the City is ensuring that essential water use remains as affordable as possible. 3. Cities construct water systems to meet the capacity of peak watering days in the summer. In Edina, the peak summer demand is approximately three times the average daily winter demand. A tiered rate system charges more per gallon for peak use, thereby allocating the cost of "oversizing" the system for peak days to the peak users. The purpose of this update is to determine how rates will need to be adjusted for 2008 and beyond to keep the utilities financially self - sufficient. Assumptions This study incorporates the proposed 2008 -2012 capital improvement plan for the utilities, and the city engineer's estimates of future capital costs from 2013 to 2020. The proposed capital improvement plans for water and sewer include the following improvements: • Sewer and water main replacement in the Country Club area • New and rehabilitated wells 3060 Centre Pointe Drive (651) 697 -8546 Fax: (651) 697 -8555 Roseville, MN 55113 -1 105 jcook ®ehlers- inc.com http: / /www.ehlers- inc.com a • New water treatment plants No. 5 and No. 6 • Morningside watermain lining • Water tower painting • Lift station rehabilitation • Storm water pipe and grading improvements • Vehicles and equipment It should be noted that the City currently has one accounting fund for water, sanitary sewer, storm water, and recycling. For this analysis, we segregated the revenues and expenses for each utility, and treated each as a separate fund. By doing so, we can ensure that each utility will "pay its own way." Municipal utility funds are considered "enterprise funds," meaning they are intended to be operated as a private enterprise in which the fee revenue pays for all expenses. For purposes of this study, we refer to each segregated utility as its own fund. Following is a chart that summarizes the significant assumptions in the rate study. 3060 Centre Pointe Drive (651) 697 -8546 Fax: (651) 697 -8555 Roseville, MN 55113-1105 jcook ®ehlers - inc.com http://www.ehlers-inc.com 2 Assumption Growth and • No new connections. Utility Usage . Water usage will continue at 2005 (non- drought) levels. • Sewer usage will remain constant. Operating • City expenses increase 3% annually Expenses . MCES sanitary sewer disposal fees increase 5.5% annually Capital Water: Averages $4.5 million per year for the next six years; averages $3.0 Expenses million per year in 2014 and thereafter. Sanitary Sewer: Averages $1.9 million per year. Storm Water: Averages $2.15 million per year. Average capital costs are in today's dollars. " Costs of improvements are inflated 4% per year in the rate study. Rate Structure No change proposed to 2007 rate structure. • Water has quarterly fixed charge and usage fee (see below) • Sewer billed based on winter quarter water consumption. 0 Storm water is fixed quarterly charge based on property use. 3060 Centre Pointe Drive (651) 697 -8546 Fax: (651) 697 -8555 Roseville, MN 55113-1105 jcook ®ehlers - inc.com http://www.ehlers-inc.com 2 Water Utility Water Fees There are two primary components to the City's water utility revenues: Meter Charges are a fixed quarterly fee based on the size of meter in the home or business. The meter charge is established to recover certain fixed expenses, such as the billing system, that the City must incur for a customer regardless of the amount of water consumed. The meter charge varies with meter size, and is proposed to increase 6.4% in 2008. Usage Fees are based on the metered use of water. Beginning in 2007 the City instituted a tiered rate system, as discussed above. Morningside area residents obtain their water from the City of Minneapolis. The City of Edina charges Morningside residents a meter fee and $.02 per 100 cubic feet. The usage rate for Morningside users is currently $2.78 per unit and is expected to increase to $2.86 in 2008. 99.3% of the usage fees are remitted directly to Minneapolis. Proposed Residential Water Rates Projected rate increases for residential users are shown in the following chart. These are consistent with the rates proposed in the January, 2007 rate study. Usage Proposed User Charges Gallons 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Rate Increase 0 -35 units 8.14% $0.93 6.40% $0.99 6.40% $1.05 6.405/6 $1.12 6.40% $1.19 6.401/6 $127 6.40% $1.35 6.400/9 $1.44 6.40% $1.53 6.400/6 $1.63 Rate Increase 3665 units 43.02% $1.23 6.40% $1.31 6.40% $1.39 6.40% $1,48 6.401/6 $358 6.401/6 6.40% $1.78 6.40% $1.90 6.40% $2.02 6400/a $2.15 _,. _!$1.68 _ Rate Increase > 65 units 124.4% $1.93 6.401/6 $2.05 6.401/6 $2.18 6.401/6 $2.32 6.40% $2.47 6.40% $2.63 6.401/6 $2.80 6.40% $2.98 6.401/6 $3.17 6.40'1. $3.37 Sprinkler Meters Water connections used solely for sprinklers are charged at the middle tier rate of $1.23 per unit for 0 -65 units per quarter, and $1.93 for each unit over 65 units. The proposed rate increases, are $1.31 and $2.05, respectively. Commercial Customers Commercial customers are charged on the first two tiers. Water consumption of 0 -35 units is $.93 per unit, and all water consumption over 35 units is $1.23 per unit. The proposed 2008 rates are $.99 and $1.31 respectively. e 3060 Centre Pointe Drive (651) 697 -8546 Fax: (651) 697 -8555 Roseville, MN 55113 -1105 jcook @ehlers- inc.com hUp://www.ehlers-inc.com 3 Water Connection Fees The City of Edina charges $2,000 per residential equivalency unit for new development. These connection fees will help pay for the capital costs of serving the new properties. To be conservative, the financial analysis does not count on any development related connection -fee revenue for 2008 and beyond. We would recommend that the City increase its connections fees annual by an inflationary factor. Cash Balances and Prudent Use of Debt Cash balances are available to accommodate fluctuations in revenue depending on weather, and to fund unexpected repairs and a portion of capital improvements. In the short -term, the City is targeting a minimum cash balance of $2,000,000. Over the long term, the City's goal is maintain a cash balance equal to 50% of operating revenues. In order to return to a positive cash position and achieve the target cash level over the long term, the City will need to finance future capital improvements. The City is considering over $15 million in capital costs for the water system over the next three years and it is not feasible to utilize cash balances for this level of improvements. Capital projects financed with debt are amortized over a ten -year period and interest rates are estimated based on a spread over current market conditions. The graph on the following page portrays the projected cash balances based on the stated assumptions and proposed capital expenditures. The proposed rate increases and use of debt financing should be adequate to maintain a minimum cash balance and achieve the target cash balance after 2020, when the debt for the Country Club and water treatment improvements has been retired. It is unrealistic to expect ratepayers to fund the level of proposed improvements and fully fund depreciation at the. same time. By keeping the term of the debt to ten years, the City will be able to: 1) Protect its bond rating; and 2) Allow time after the debt is reliance on debt in the future. 3060 Centre Pointe Drive Roseville, MN 55113 -1105 retired to fund replacement reserves and reduce (651) 697 -8546 Fax: (651) 697 -8555 jcook@ehlers -i nc.com http: / /www.ehlers- inc.com 4 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 ($2,000,000) ($4,000,000) City of Edina Water Utility Projected Cash Balances 2008 cash includes bond proceeds for 2009 projects r o .- N ro v in m r co rn o 8 p�p p�p p�p p�p p�p p�p p�p p�p p�p p�p N N N N N N N N N N N N N � Ending cash --♦— Long -term Target Cash Balance (50% or operating re\oenues) Recommendation for Water Fees Based on the completed rate study, we would recommend: 1) The 2008 meter charges and usage water rates increase 6.4% over 2007, consistent with the previous rate analysis. 2) The City Council review and establish water rates on an annual basis. The analysis projects 6.4% annual water rate increases after 2009. A. 3060 Centre Pointe Drive (651) 697 -8546 Fax: (651) 697 -8555 Roseville, MN 55113-1105 jcook @ehlers- inc.com http://www.ehlers-inc.com 5 Sanitary Sewer Utility Sewer Fees The City of Edina participates in the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) sanitary sewer system. The City is responsible for the sewer collection system within the City limits and then pays MCES disposal fees for treatment. The MCES disposal fees have increased 5 - 9% each of the last four years. The rate study anticipates that future increases for these fees will be 5.5 %, annually. The MCES disposal fees comprise almost 70% of the sewer utility's operating expenses. Another 5% of expenditures represent depreciation, while only 25% of operating expenditures are within the City's control. Sewer Rate Structure The 2007 rate structure is $2.45 per unit of sewer. One unit is 100 cubic feet or approximately 750 gallons. The sewer usage is assumed to be identical to water usage during the winter quarter when there is almost no outside water use (ca'r washing, lawn sprinkling, swimming pool, etc.). There is a minimum quarterly fee, regardless of use, of $39.20 (16 units or 1600 cubic feet). The minimum charge helps pay for the fixed costs of the system. Proposed Sewer Rates The projected rate increase for sanitary sewer is 4.5% per year for the next ten years. We do not recommend changing the rate structure at this time. The unit charge and the minimum quarterly charge would both be increased by 4.5 %. The proposed rate per unit is in the chart below. Sanitary Sewer 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 .2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Rate per $2.34 $2.45 $2.56 $2.67 $2.79 $2.92 $3.05 $3.18 $3.33 $3.48 $3.63 Unit Sanitary Sewer City Connection Fees The City charges a sewer connection fee for new users to "buy -in" to the system. Connection fees are paid at the time a builder or homeowner pulls a building permit. For growing communities connection fees often exceed $5,000 per single family home. In fully developed cities, connection fees are usually $2,500 or less. The 2007 connection fee in the City of Edina is $2,000 per residential equivalency unit. In addition, the City collects the MCES connection fee and remits it to the Metropolitan Council. The City sewer connection fees will help offset City sanitary sewer infrastructure costs associated with new development and redevelopment. To be. conservative, the projections presented 3060 Centre Pointe Drive (651) 697 -8546 Fax: (651) 697 -8555 Roseville, MN 55113 -1105 jcook @ehlers - inc.com http://www.ehlers-inc.com 6 in the Appendices to the rate study do not consider the collection of any connection fee revenues for projects not already approved. We would recommend an annual inflationary increase to the connection fee. Cash Balances The target cash balance for the sewer fund equals 50% of sewer operating revenues. Cash balances are available to accommodate fluctuations in revenue, pay for new and unexpected regulatory requirements, to fund a portion of capital improvements, and to establish replacement reserves. The City anticipates roughly $5.5 million in capital expenditures for the sanitary sewer system in 2007 and 2008. This level of expenditures cannot be financed internally, given current cash levels and the goal of maintaining 50% operating reserves. The rate analysis assumes $4.2 million of the 2008 -2009 projects will be financed in 2008 over a ten -year period and interest rates are estimated based on a spread over current market conditions. Roughly 80% of the cost of future improvements are also anticipated to be financed. The graph below portrays the projected cash balances based on the stated assumptions and proposed capital expenditures. It can be seen that the proposed rate increases and use of debt financing should be adequate to achieve the target cash balance. City of Edina Sanitary Sewer Utility Projected Cash Balances 6,000,000 - - - -- - - - - -- 2008 cash includes 5,000,000 bond proceeds for Ending cash 2009 projects 4,000,000 3,000,000 --*.—Target Cash Balance 2,000,000 (500/6 of operating 1,000,000 revenues 0 LO r- 8 app p p p O O O S o N M v CO ao W N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 3060 Centre Pointe Drive (651) 697 -8546 Fax: (651) 697 -8555 Roseville, MN 551 13 -1105 jcook @ehlers- inc.com http: / /www.ehlers- inc.com 7 Recommendation for Sanitary Sewer Fees Based on the completed rate study, we would recommend that the City continue to increase sewer rates 4.5% per year, in order to meet the goals of funding capital improvements of the system and a 50% operating reserve balance. Storm Water Rates Over the next five years, the City anticipates approximately $10.7 million in capital costs to address storm water from drain tile systems, expand storm water ponds, rehabilitate lift stations and replace its aging storm water system. Storm water rates will need to be increased to fund the capital projects and maintain minimum cash reserves. The City's current quarterly storm water rate is $14.39 per quarter. The proposed rate increases in the chart below will allow the City to maintain and improve its storm water infrastructure, as well as sustaining adequate cash reserves. These rates are consistent with the rates proposed in the January, 2007 rate analysis, and are comparable with other fully developed metro area communities. Actual 2005 Actual 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 $6.74 $10.74 $14.39 $15.54 $16.79 $18.13 $19.58 $21.15 $22.84 $24.66 $26.64 Cities across the state will be facing pressure to generate more revenue to fund storm water systems. The Clean Water Legacy Act provided funding to test and develop plans for Minnesota's polluted waterways. These plans may result in new unfunded mandates for local governments. While the future requirements for managing the quality and quantity of storm water are unknown, the level of projected capital expenses in this study should pay for many of the mandated improvements. Our experience with other cities indicates that most have not yet planned for significant improvements to their storm water system, and their quarterly fees are established at a level that will only pay for the annual operations and maintenance of the storm water system. As more cities undertake planning for capital improvements to their storm water systems, we expect to see higher storm water utility fees across the metro area. 3060 Centre Pointe Drive (651) 697 -8546 Fax: (651) 697 -8555 - Roseville, MN 55113-1105 jcook @ehlers - inc.com hup: / /www.ehlers- inc.com 8 Cash Balances The purpose of the cash balance is to allow the City to fund routine improvements on a "pay -as- you -go" basis, reserving the use of debt for major improvements, and have operating reserves available for cashflow purposes. It is our recommendation that the system be operated to maintain a minimum cash balance of $500,000. The projected cash balances, assuming the proposed rates above, are shown in the following graph. It should be noted that the large cash balance in 2008 is the result of bond proceeds which will be expended on 2009 capital projects. Sample Utility Bills The chart below shows the total utility bill for sample residents who use varying amounts of water. Because residents view their utilities together in one bill, we have included water, sanitary, and storm water charges, along with a cumulative total. 3060 Centre Pointe Drive (651) 697 -8546 Fax: (651) 697 -8555 Roseville, MN 55113-1105 jcook ®ehlers - inc.com http: / /www.ehlers- inc.com 9 City of Edina Sample Projected Residential Utility Bills Sample Family Quarterly E 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Winter months - 30 units water and sewer Sewer 70.20 73.36 76.66 80.11 83.71 87.48 91.42 Water 36.40 39.19 41.70 44.37 47.21 50.23 53.44 Storm Water 10.74 14.39 15.54 16.79 18.13 19.58 21.15 Total $ 117.34 $126.94 $133.90 $141.26 $149.05 $157.29 $166.01 Combined Fee Increase Combined Fee Increase $ 9.60 $ ' 6.96 $ 7.36 $ 7.79 $ 8.24 $ 8.72 Percent Increase Percent Increase 8.2% 5.5% 5.5% 5.5% 5.5% 5.5% Summer months - 50 units water and 30 units sewer Sewer 70.20 73.36 76.66 80.11 83.71 87.48 91.42 Water 53.60 62.29 66.28 70.52 75.03 79.83 84.94 Storm Water 10.74 14.39 15.54 16.79 18.13 19.58 21.15 Total $ 134.54 $150.04 $158.48 $167.41 $176.87 $186.89 $197.51 Combined Fee Increase $ 15.50 $ 8.44 $ 8.93 $ 9.46 $ 10.02 $ 10.61 Percent Increase 11.5% 5.6% 5.6% 5.7% 5.7% 5.7% Sample Summer Quarterly 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 100 units water and 30 units sewer Sewer 70.20 73.36 76.66 80.11 83.71 87.48 91.42 Water 96.60 148.29 157.78 167.88 178.62 190.05 202.22 Storm Water 10.74 14.39 15.54 16.79 18.13 19.58 21.15 Total $ 177.54 $ 236.04 $ 249.98 $ 264.77 $ 280.47 $ 297.11 $ 314.78 Combined Fee Increase $ 58.50 $ 13.94 $ 14.79 $ 15.69 $ 16.65 $ 17.67 Percent Increase 33.0% 5.9% 5.9% 5.9% 5.9% 5.9% Utility Rate Comparison The City of Edina has historically had relatively low utility rates. Rate increases that began in 2006 now make Edina comparable to many metro area communities. A comparison of a typical residential utility bill to other communities is in the following chart. Please note that the usage in the comparative chart below is lower than the three sample bills shown above. 3060 Centre Pointe Drive (651) 697 -8546 Fax: (651) 697 -8555 Roseville, MN 55113 -1105 jcook @ehlers- inc.com http: / /www.ehiers- inc.com 10 City of Edina 2007 Water Rate Comparison Based on Residential Service Assumes Quarterly use of 36 units water and 18 units sewer Summary The City of Edina has managed its utility funds well, and as a result has been able to pay for improvements on a cash basis in the past. However, the need to reinvest in the water and sewer utility system over the next several years has put new financial pressures on all of the utility funds. The rate study indicates that rate increases are necessary in 2008 to rebuild cash balances and pay for capital improvements. Modest and steady annual rate increases will be needed for water, sanitary sewer, and storm water utilities to pay for City operating costs and capital improvements. While this analysis proposes the use of debt to allow for steady and predictable rate increases, it is not a debt plan. The City should review whether it has sufficient cash to pay for capital improvements prior to issuing debt. At its option, the City may accumulate less cash in its utility funds (thereby funding less depreciation) in order to reduce the amount of new debt issued for utility improvements. As with all other bonding decisions, the City's decision to issue debt for any given improvement will be based on many factors, including the City's cash balances, rating, and other financing needs. e 3060 Centre Pointe Drive (651) 697 -8546 Fax: (651) 697 -8555 Roseville, MN 55113 -1105 jcook @ehlers- inc.com http: / /www.ehlers- inc.com 11 Quarterly Quarterly Quarterly City Water Sewer Storm Total Minnetonka 44.95 39.75 9.00 93.70 St. Louis Park 42.80 44.47 11.50 98.77 Richfield 56.43 34.56 9.90 100.89 Edina - 2007 45.07 44.10 14.39 103.56 Inver Grove Heights 69.66 38.23 0.00 107.89 (excludes Northwest Area) Edina - Proposed 2008 47.95 46.08 15.54 109.58 Bloomington 61.61 35.13 13.59 110.33 Chanhassen 56.65 58.86 7.80 123.31 Edina - Morningside -2007 93.96 46.08 10.74 150.78 Summary The City of Edina has managed its utility funds well, and as a result has been able to pay for improvements on a cash basis in the past. However, the need to reinvest in the water and sewer utility system over the next several years has put new financial pressures on all of the utility funds. The rate study indicates that rate increases are necessary in 2008 to rebuild cash balances and pay for capital improvements. Modest and steady annual rate increases will be needed for water, sanitary sewer, and storm water utilities to pay for City operating costs and capital improvements. While this analysis proposes the use of debt to allow for steady and predictable rate increases, it is not a debt plan. The City should review whether it has sufficient cash to pay for capital improvements prior to issuing debt. At its option, the City may accumulate less cash in its utility funds (thereby funding less depreciation) in order to reduce the amount of new debt issued for utility improvements. As with all other bonding decisions, the City's decision to issue debt for any given improvement will be based on many factors, including the City's cash balances, rating, and other financing needs. e 3060 Centre Pointe Drive (651) 697 -8546 Fax: (651) 697 -8555 Roseville, MN 55113 -1105 jcook @ehlers- inc.com http: / /www.ehlers- inc.com 11 Appendices to this report follow: Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C 3060 Centre Pointe Drive Roseville, MN 55113 -1105 Water Utility Projections Sanitary Sewer Utility Projections Storm Water Utility Projections (651) 697 -8546 Fax: (651) 697-8555 jcook @ehlers- inc.com http://www.ehlers-inc.com 12 City of Edina Utility Funds Water Fund Other revenue increase 3.00% Expenditure increase 3.00% Investment Earnings Revenues Water 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.001/6 3.00% 3.001/6 3.001/6 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.009/6 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.009% 3.00% 3.001/6 Appendix A 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.009% 3.00% Financial Staten Estimated Projected 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 3 urges for 3;967922 =4',9,7x7.1639 4 Quarterly Meter Service Charges 800,985 852.248 906,792 964,826 1,026,575 1,092,276 1,162,182 1,236,561 1,315,701 1,399,906 1,489,500 5 Charges for Water Usage 4,317,103 4,570,157 4,839,406 5,125,888 5,430,704 5,755,028 6,100,110 6,467,276 6,857,941 7,273,609 7,715,879 6 Water Access Charge 7 Water Testing 81,217 86,226 88,813 91,477 94,222 97,048 99,960 102,959 106,047 109,229 112,506 115,881 119,357 8 Other 69,614 26,579 27,376 28,198 29,044 29,915 30,812 31,737 32,689 33,669 34,680 35,720 36,791 9 10 Total operating revenues II 4,068,754 5,090,444 5,234,277 5,542,080 5,869,463 6,217,677 6,588,051 6,982,000 7,401,028 7,846,736 8,320,828 8,825,116 9,361,528 12 Expenses 13 14 15 Admin 480,948 487,332 501,952 517,011 532,521 548,497 564,952 581,900 599,357 617,338 635,858 654,934 674,582 16 Buildings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 Water Distribution 1,746,996 1,590,549 1,638,265 1,687,413 1,738,036 1,790,177 1,843,882 1,899,198 1,956,174 2,014,860 2,075,305 2,137,564 2,201,691 18 Tanks, Towers, and Reservoirs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 Sourceof Supply 262,124 292,561 301,338 310,378 319,690 329,280 339,159 378,334 389,684 401,374 413,415 425,818 438,592 20 Water Treatment 358,838 502,162 517,226 532,743 548,726 565,187 582,143 599,607 617,595 636,123 655,207 674,863 695,109 21 Meter Reading 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 Meter Repair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23 Equip Operation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 Training 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 25 Depreciation 668,797 668,808 802,149 929,961 1,084,294 1,160,108 1,319,010 1,474,038 1,597,215 1,727,245 1,864,461 2,009,210 2,161,853 26 27 Total operating expense 3,517,702 3,541,412 3,760,931 3,977,506 4,223,266 4,393,249 4,649,145 4,933,077 5,160,025 5,396,940 5,644,247 5,902,389 6,171,828 28 29 Operating income (loss) 551,052 1,549,032 1,473,346 1,564,574 1,646,197 1,824,428 1,938,906 2,048,923 21241,002 2,449,796 21676,581 21922,727 3,189,700 30 32 Cash now ., Operating income (loss) 551,052 1,514,097 1,473,346 1,564,574 1,646,197 1,824,428 1,938,906 2,048,923 2,241,002 2,449,796 2,676,581 2,922,727 3,189,700 34 Depreciation 668,797 668,808 802,149 929,961 1,084,294 1,160,108 1,319,010 1,474,038 1,597 ,215 1,727,245 1,864,461 2,009,210 2,161,853 35 Other changes 36 Crain (loss) on disposal of assets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 37 tntergovemmental 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 Bond payments on existing debt (182,328) (184,935) (610,866) (553,463) (553,303) (554,770) (560,078) (556,868) - (367,800) (364,800) (366,300) (367,200) 0 39 Miscellanous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 Investment income 50,390 11,500 50,544 184,084 61,148 60,577 61,477 66,719 71,500 77,916 78,820 73,882 64,457 41 Transfers 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42 43 Capital 44 (5,774,240) (1,074,468) (5,663,840) (5,187,354) (6,321,736) (2,164,238) (6,204,930) (5,772,891) (3,947,795) (4,105,707) (4,269,935) (4,440,733) (4,618,362) Prepared by ENers and Associates, Inc. 12/122007 2008 Update (12.04) Water City of Edina Utility Funds Water Fund Appendix A Other revenue increase 3.00% 3.00% 3.00°/ 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00°/ 3.00°/ 3.00% 3.00°/ 3.00% 3.00% Expenditure increase 3.00% . 3.000/6 3.001/0 3.00% 3.009/6 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.000/. 3.00% 3.001/6 3.001/6 Investment Earnings 3.001/6 3.00% 3.00°/1 3.001/6 3.001/6 3.00% 3.00% 3.001/6 3.001/6 3.006/6 3.00% Financial Staten Estimated Projected 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 45 Bond Proceeds 3,062,766 8,400,000 5,100,000 1,400,000 5,500,000 5,500,000 .3,950,000 4,100,000 4,250,000 4,450,000 4,600,000 46 Bonds: - 47 Debt (P &I) -2008 Bonds (4.01 /6 for 10 years) (1,035,644) (1,035,644) (1,035,644) (1,035,644) (1,035,644) (1,035,644) (1,035,644) (1,035,644) (1,035,644) (1,035,644) 48 Debt (P &I) - 2009 Bonds (50/6 for 10 years) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 49 Debt (P &1) - 2010 Bonds (5.01/1 for 10 years) (660,473) (660,473) (660,473) (660,473) (660,473) (660,473) (660,473) (660,473) 50 Debt (P &1) -2011 Bonds (5.25% for 10 years) (183,514) (183,514) (183,514) (183,514) (183,514) (183,514) (183,514) 51 Debt (P &I) - 2012 Bonds (5-25% for 10 years) (720,948) (720,948) (720,948) (720,948) (720,948) (720,948) .-2 Debt (P &1) -2013 Bonds (5.5 %for 10 years) (729,673) (729,673) (729,673) (729,673) (729,673) 53 Debt (P &1) - 2014 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) (524,038) (524,038) (524,038) (524,038) 54 Debt (P &1) - 2015 Bonds (5.5 %for 10 years) (543,938) (543,938) (543,938) 55 Debt (P &1) - 2016 Bonds (5.51/1 for 10 years) (563,838) (563,838) 56 Debt (P &1) - 2017 Bonds (5.51/1 for 10 years) (590,372) 57 Debt (M) - 2018 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) 58 Debt (M) - 2019 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) 59 Debt (M) - 2020 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) 60 Debt (P &1) - 2021 Bonds (5.51/6 for 10 years) ' 61 Debt (P &I) - 2022 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) 62 Debt (P &1) - 2020 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) 63 .097,8.12) (19,012) 29,988 17/,754 159}41 213}69 30,159 (161,601) (31x4,180) (154,7,89) 64 65 Beginning cash 2,373,351 (2,312,977) 1,684,790 6,136,123 2,038,281 2,019,239 2,049,227 2,223,981 2,383,322 2,597,191 2,627;350 2,462,749 2,148,569 66 67 Ending cash 2 }12.977 1,684,790 - 6,136,123 2,038,281 2,019,239 2,049,227 2,223,981 2}83 }22 2 }97,191 - 2,627 }50 2,462,749 2;148,569 1,993,780 63 69 70 Target cash balance (50% ofoperating revenues) 2,545,222 2,617,138 2,771,040 2,934,732 3,108,839 3,294,026 3,491,000 3,700,514 3,923,368 4,160,414 4,412,558 4,680,764 71 72 Actual cash over (under) minumum cash balance (860,432) 3,518,985 (732,759) (915,493) (1,059,612) (1,070,045) (1,107,678) (1,103.323) (1,296,018) (1.697,665) (2.263,989) (2,686,984) Prepared by Ehlers and Associates, Inc. 12/12/2007 2008 Update (12.04) I - City of Edina Sewer Utility Sanitary Sewer Appendix B Sanitary Sewer Charg_ es Increase 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% Investment Rate Sewer Charges 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% Other revenue increase 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% MCES Disposal Cost Increase 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% Expenditure increase 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% Financial Statemi Estimated Projected 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 I Revenues Sewer Charges 5,638,596 5,892,333 6,157,488 6,434,575 6,724,131 7,026,717 7,342,919 7,673,350 8,018,651 8,379,490 8,756,567 4 City SAC 5 Other 69,614 26,579 27,376 28,198 29,044 29,915 30,812 31,737 32,689 33,669 34,680 6 7 Total operating revenues 5,708,210 5,918,912 6,184,864 6,462,772 6,753,174 7,056,631 7,373,731 7,705,087 8,051,340 8,413,160 8,791,247 8 9 Expenses 10 II Disposal Charges 3,442,190 3,948,870 4,067,336 4,189,356 4,315,037 4,444,488 4,577,823 4,715,158 4,856,612 4,577,823 4,715,158 12 Admin. 480,948 487,332 501,952 517,011 532,521 548,497 564,952 581,900 599,357 564,952 581,900 13 Pumping & Lift Stations 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 Buildings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 Meter Reading 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 Meter Repair 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17 Equip Operation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I4 Training 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 Sewer Cleaning 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 Lift Station Maint 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21 Misc Treatment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22 Collection Systems 311,371 429,674 453,306 478,237 504,540 532,290 561,566 592,452 625,037 659,414 695,682 23 Depreciation 334,398 334,404 375,566 470,833 484,958 534,507 550,542 602,058 658,120 715,864 783,340 24 - 25 Total operating expense 4,568,907 5,200,280 5,398,160 5,655,438 5,837,057 6,059,782 6,254,883 6,491,568 6,739,127 6,518,052 6,776,079 26 27 1Operatiog income (loss)_, 1,139,304 718,632 786,704 807,335 _916,117 996,849 1,118,848 1,213,518 1,312,213 1,895,107 2,015,167 Prepared by Ehlers and Associates, Inc. 12/12/2007 N:Wlinnsota\EDINA \Utility Rate Study12008 Update\2008 Update (12.04) City of Edina Sewer Utilitv Sanitary Sewer Charges Increase 450% Investment Rate 4.501/6 Other revenue increase 3.00% MCES Disposal Cost Increase 5.50% Expenditure increase 100% Sanitary Sewer Appendix B 450% 4.501% 4.50% 4.501/6 4.50% 4.501/. 4.50% 4.50% 450% 3 00 % 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3 00 *,0 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 5.50% 100% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% Financial Statem( Estimated Projected 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 28 21) Cash flow 30 Operating income (loss) 1,139,304 718,632 786,704 807,335 916,117 996,849 1,118,848 1,213,518 1,312,213 1,895,107 2,015,167 31 Depreciation 334,398 334,404 375,566 470,833 484,958 534,507 550,542 602,058 658,120 715,864 783,340 32 Other changes 33 Gain (loss) on disposal ofassets 34 Intergovernmental 35 Bond payments 1999A (316,710) (315,900) (314,700) (317,810) 36 Bond payments 2003C (182,328) (184,935) (186,860) (188,063) (188,503) (190970) (192,778) (191,568) 37 Bond Payments 2007B (215,639) (183,600) (188,200) (187,500) (186,600) (185,500) (184,200) (187,600) (185,700) 38 Miscellanous 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 39 Investment income 50,390 11,500 114,760 159,806 95,464 104,478 99,356 109,968 115,566 121,698 126,429 40 Transfers 71,962 86,008 86,578 103,401 115,566 121,698 126,429 41 Met Council ) &1 Surcharge (115,000) (130,000) (130,000) (130,000) (130,000) 42 Met Council I &I Surcharge Rebate (50%) 57,500 0 65,000 65,000 65,000 4? Capital (619,636) (886,126) (3,258,320) (2,245,402) (2,058,501) (701,915) (2,189,975) (2,388,669) (2484,216) (2.583.585) (2.686,928) Bond proceeds 1,556,501 4,200,000 1,750,000 1,750,000 1,900,000 1,900,000 2,300,000 2,300,000 46 Bonds: 47 Debt (P &I) -2008 Bonds (4.00% for 10 years) (517,822) (517,822) (517,822) (517,822) (517,822) (517,822) (517,822) (517,822) 48 Debt (P&, I) - 2009 Bonds (5.0% for 10 years) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 Debt (P &I) - 2010 Bonds (5.00% for 10 years) (229,393) (229,393) (229,393) (229,393) (229,393) (229,393) 50 Debt (P &I) - 2011 Bonds (5.25% for 10 years) 0 0 0 0 0 51 Debt (P &I) - 2012 Bonds (5.25% for 10 years) (229,393) (229,393) (229,393) (229,393) 52 Debt (P &I) - 2013 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) (252,069) (252,069) (252,069) 53 Debt (P &I) - 2014 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) (252,069) (252,069) 54 Debt (P &I) - 2015 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) (305,136) 55 Debt (P &I) - 2016 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) Sri Debt (P &I) - 2017 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) 57 Debt (P &1) - 2018 Bonds (5.5% for 10 years) 61 Cash flow 290,420 1,161,575 1,501,512 (2,144,723) 300,476 (170,757) 353,757 186,602 204,374 902,437 692,856 61 63 Beginning cash 2.373.351 2,663,770 3,825,345 5,326,857 3,182,134 3,482,610 3,311,853 3,665,610 3,852,212 3,311,853 3,665,610 64 65 Ending cash 2,663,770 3,825,345 5,326,857 3,182,134 3,482,610 3,311,853 3,665,610 3,852,212 4,056,585 4,214,289 4,358,465 6i, 67 Target Cash Balance (50% of 2,854,105 2959,456 3,092,432 3,231,386 3,376,587 3,528,316 3,686,866 3,852,543 4,025,670 4,206,580 4,395,623 68 69 Actual cash over (under) mmumum cash balam 865,889 2,234,425 (49'252) 106,023 216:163 21?56 i i 332 i 30,915 7,710 37.158) Prepared by Ehlers and Associates. Inc. 12/12/2007 N \Minnsota\EDINA \Utility Rate Study\2008 Update\2008 Update (12.04) City of Edina Storm Sewer Fund Storm Sewer Revenue Increase Other revenue increase Investment Rate Expenditure increase Revenues Charges for services 4 Other 5 o Total operating revenues 8 Expenses 9 Operating Expenses 10 Depreciation 11 Total operating expense 1' I Operating income (loss) 14 Cash flow 15 Operating income (loss) 16 Depreciation 17 Other changes 18 Intergovernmental 19 Interest income 20 Transfers 21 Disposal of assets 2_' Bond proceeds 23 Debt payments: 1999 bonds 24 Debt payments. 2007 bonds 25 Debt (P &1) - 2008 Bonds 26 Debt (P &I) - 2009 Bonds 27 Debt (P &1) - 2010 Bonds 28 Debt (P &1) -2011 Bonds 29 Debt (P &I) - 2012 Bonds 30 Debt (P &I) - 2013 Bonds 31 Debt (P &I) - 2014 Bonds 32 Debt (P &I) - 2015 Bonds 33 Debt (P &I) - 2016 Bonds 34 Debt (P &I) - 2017 Bonds 35 Debt (P &I) - 2018 Bonds 38 Capital a Cash flow 1 4 ` Beginning cash I Ending cash I 1 Quarterly Charge for Single Family Storm %k. er For Discussion ►� Prepared by Ehlers and Associates, Inc. 12/12/2007 2008 Update (12.04) 34.00% 8.00% 8.00% &00% 8,00% 8.00% 800% 8.00% 8.00% 800% 8.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3 .00 % 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 100% 3.00% 3.00% 3,00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 300% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3,00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3 00 % 3.00% Per Financial Statements Estimated Projected 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 824,068 1,242,082 1,556,429 1,680,944 1,815,419 1,960,653 2,117,505 2,286905 2,469,858 2,667,446 2,880,842 3,111,310 3,360,214 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 824,068 1,242,082 1,556,429 1,680 944 1,815,419 1,960,653 2,117,505 2,286,905 2,469,858 2,667,446 2,880,842 3.111,310 3,360,214 208,211 195,196 195,874 201,750 207,802 214,036 220,458 227,071 233,883 240,900 248,127 255,571 263,238 291,568 334,398 334,404 391,600 450,073 503,598 571,584 646,461 720,714 799,389 882,707 970,897 1,064,201 499,779 529,595 530,278 593,350 657,876 717,635 792,041 873,533 954,598 1,040,289 1,130,834 1,226,468 1,327,439 324,289 712,488 1,026,152 1,087,594 1,157,544 1,243,018 1,325,464 1,413,373 1,515,260 1,627,157 19750,009 1,884,842 2,032,775 324,289 712,488 1,026,152 1,087,594 1,157,544 1,243,018 1,325,464 1,413,373 1,515,260 1,627,157 1,750,009 1,884,842 2,032,775 291,568 334,398 334,404 391,600 450,073 503,598 571,584 646,461 720,714 799,389 882,707 970,897 1,064,201 (3.421) 4,246 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47,440 78,622 32,893 33,689 30,750 31,390 34,294 35,140 36,822 37,456 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4,553 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,625,043 2,500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 1,900,000 1,900,000 2,000,000 2,200,000 2,350,000 2,500,000 'I 09i 1123.110 (123,945) (124,545) (119,830) (504,474) (434,600) (432,000) (433,900) (435,200) (431,000) (431,300) (431,000) (430,100) (433,500) (4.75% for 10 years) (319,842) (319,842) (319,842) (319,842) (319,842) (319,842) (319,842) (319,842) (319,842) (5.0% for 10 years) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (5.25% for 10 years) (131,082) (131,082) (131,082) (131,082) (131,082) (131,082) (131,082) (5.25% for 10 years) (196,622) (196,622) (196,622) (196,622) (196,622) (196,622) (5.25% for 10 years) (249,055) (249,055) (249,055) (249,055) (249,055) (5.5% for 10 years) (252,069) (252,069) (252,069) (252,069) (5.5% for 10 years) (265,336) (265,336) (265,336) (5.5% for 10 years) (291,869) (291,869) (5.5% for 10 years) (311,769) (5.5% for 10 years) (5.5% for 10 years) 11,0'_8.9703 (805.948) (2,427,125) (2358,200) (2,336,256) (1001,133) (2,643,880) (2,886,509) (2.742959) (2,852,677) (2966,784) (3.085,455) (3,208,874) (534,283) 121,346 2,434,529 1,039,414 1,524,290, 26,534 19- 96x, 21,329 96,805 28,194 56,066 21,131 (2 (441275) 975,558 (853?1_', 1,581,317 2,620,731 1,096,441 1,122,975 1,025,007 1,046,336 1,143,141 1,171,335 1,227,401 1,248,531 (975558) l (S.",212)1 1,581,317 2,620,731 1,096,441 1,122,975 1,025,007 1,046,336 1,143,141 1,171,335 1,227,401 1,248,531 1,222,946 6.74 10.74 14.39 15.54 16.79 18.13 19.58 21.15 22.84 24.66 26.64 28.77 3107 Prepared by Ehlers and Associates, Inc. 12/12/2007 2008 Update (12.04) \�• 7*-" D aae�/ To: Mayor & City Council From: John Wallin Finance Director Date: December 18, 2007 Subject: Capital Improvement Program REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item # VLF Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Approve Capital Improvement Program for 2008 — 2012. Info /Background: The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for calendar years 2008 — 2012 will be discussed. A summary is attached. The CIP was given to the City Council for the November 20 workshop. Please bring the binder with you to this meeting. Memo To: Mayor & City Council From: Finance Department Date: December 14, 2007 Re: 2008 Proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Attached are revised pages 9 through 12 of the 2008 proposed CIP. You may discard the old pages 9 through 12 and replace them with this revised version. The revisions are mostly to reflect Edinborough Park's addition of concessions and additional birthday party rentals that could be possible if. contemplated renovations are approved. This proposed CIP will be posted on the internet for public review Please bring your revised copy of the proposed 2008 CIP to the Council meeting on Tuesday. t • w9tA.r� �t� L • .a CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CONSTRUCTION. FUND BALANCE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Projected Construction Fund Unreserved Fund Balance Expenditures General Government Estimate Budget 110,000 Forecast 110,000 110,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Revenues Public Safety 5,600,000 50,000 - 40,000 - Intergovernmental $ 1,899,000 $ 1,664,440 $ 701,000 $ 966,000 $ 1,940,000 $ 604,000 Special Assessment 2,105,698 678,483 560,141 506,092 426,769 388,371 Interest (4.5 %) 138,838 160,102 120,222 112,769 112,087 123,961 Total Revenues 4,143,536 2,503,025 1,381,363 1,584,861 2,478,856 1,116,332 Expenditures General Government 110,000 545,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 Park & Rec 558,000 544,800 555,000 554,000 440,000 600,000 Public Safety 5,600,000 50,000 - 40,000 - - Public Works 9,103,000 18,792,800 6,286,000 5,890,000 8,350,000 6,248,000 Total Expenditures 15,371,000 19,932,600 6,951,000 6,594,000 8,900,000 6,958,000 Other Financing Sources /(Uses) Transfers In /(Out) 180,000 CIP Bonds 5,623,308 PIR Bonds 5,821,893 Unidentified Funding - Total Other Sources 11,625,201 Increase (Decrease) $ 397,737 Beginning Balance $ 3,160,085 Ending Balance $ 3,557,822 200,000 204,000 (345,000) 125,000 325,000 10,000,000 - - - - 6,343,360 5,200,000 4,669,000 6,360,000 5,594,000 - - 670,000 200,000 16,543,360 5,404,000 4,994,000 6,685,000 5,919,000 $ (886,215) $ (165,637) $ (15,139) $ 263,856 $ 77,332 $ 3,557,822 $ 2,671,607 $ 2,505,970 $ 2,490,831 $ 2,754,687 $ 2,671,607 $ 2,505,970 $ 2,490,831 $ 2,754,687 $ 2,832,019 Construction Fund Unreserved Balance Trend $14,000,000 Last Ten Fiscal Years (Actual) and Next Five Fiscal Years (Estimate) $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $- 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 The charts above show the projected impact this CIP will have on the Construction Fund along with a ten -year history of Construction Fund balances. The 2002 balance was abnormally high due to a bond issue for City Hall, the majority of which wasn't spent until 2003. Page 9 A. oe}# `L'' '0 a a • 'AtY.ttNl:u.Rw ' CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ENTERPRISE FUND CASH BALANCES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Projected Enterprise Fund Cash Balances Page 10 • w �1 Estimate Budget • Plan Aquatic Center 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Cash - January 1 805,626 903,900 1,003,581 1,070,569 1,119,126 (66,565) Net Income 58,274 54,681 27,488 (918) (30,640) (20,702) CIP Expenditures (30,000) (30,000) (40,000) (40,000) (1,250,000) (50,000) Transfer Cash In /(Out) - - - - - - Other Cash Adjustment a 70,000 75,000 79,500 89,475 94,949 100,946 Cash - December 31 903,900 1,003,581 1,070,569 1,119,126 (66,565) (36,321) Arena 2007 2008 2009 2010 2012 2012 Cash - January 1 29,766 15,359 (10,500) (34,609) 172,205 95,852 Net Income (194,407) (205,859) (208,709) (212,674) (306,026) (289,876) CIP Expenditures (25,000) (75,000) (116,000) (1,675,000) (275,000) (25,000) Transfer Cash In /(Out) 105,000 155,000 196,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 Other Cash Adjustment a 100,000 100,000 104,600 1,989,488 399,673 150,163 Cash - December 31 15,359 (10,500) (34,609) 172,205 95,852 36,139 Art Center 2007 2008 2009 2010 2012 2012 Cash - January 1 11,808 18,182 8,509 7,553 5,396 7,127 Net Income (159,626) (175,673) (177,886) (180,045) (182,144) (184,175) CIP Expenditures (70,000) (25,000) (5,000) (670,000) (200,000) - Transfer Cash In /(Out) 205,000 160,000 150,000 815,000 350,000 150,000 Other Cash Adjustment s 31,000 31,000 31,930 32,888 33,875 34,891 Cash - December 31 18,182 8,509 7,553 5,396 7,127 7,843 Edinborough /Centennial 2007 2008 2009 2010 2012 2012 Cash - January 1 4,314,937 4,045,746 3,287,638 2,411,744 722,229 296,473 Net Income (194,691) (291,108) (352,144) (387,278) (436,307) (481,847) CIP Expenditures (174,500) (572,000) (634,000) (1,418,000) (111,000) (204,500) Transfer Cash In /(Out) - - - - - - Other Cash Adjustment a 100,000 105,000 110,250 115,763 121,551 127,629 Cash - December 31 4,045,746 3,287,638 2,411,744 722,229 296,473 (262,245) Page 10 • w �1 A. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA y J• ^xrarR ENTERPRISE FUND CASH BALANCES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Projected Enterprise Fund Cash Balances Golf Course 2007 2008 2009 2010 2012 2012 Cash - January 1 (947,694) (1,266,350) (1,029,065) (739,147) (224,141) 70,535 Net Income 39,344 276,285 312,418 342,981 370,050 398,187 CIP Expenditures (243,000) (174,000) (253,000) (1,435,000) (265,000) (195,000) Transfer Cash In /(Out) - 170,000 170,000 170,000 170,000 170,000 Other Cash Adjustment a (115,000) (35,000) 60,500 1,437,025 19,626 (41,642) Cash - December 31 (1,266,350) 1,029,065 (739,147) 224,141 70,535 402,080 Golf Dome 2007 2008 2009 2010 2012 2012 Cash - January 1 68,410 62,262 61,235 44,007 124,855 142,936 Net Income 32,852 56,973 65,422 73,130 79,978 87,289 CIP Expenditures - - (20,000) (200,000) (30,000) - Transfer Cash In/(Out) - - - - - - Other Cash Adjustment a (39,000) (58,000) (62,650) 207,718 (31,897) (31,491) Cash - December 31 62,262 61,235 44,007 124,855 142,936 198,734 Liquor Stores 2007 2008 2009 2010 2012 2012 Cash - January 1 1,048,982 1,089,641 1,034,262 1,005,801 1,023,860 1,113,436 Net Income 1,158,475 1,233,019 1,318,861 1,409,870 1,506,335 1,608,564 CIP Expenditures (137,000) (95,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) Transfer Cash In/(Out) (1,061,200) (1,277,800) (1,335,100) (1,383,100) (1,411,700) (1,436,100) Other Cash Adjustment a 80,384 84,402 87,778 91,289 94,941 98,738 Cash - December 31 1,089,641 1,034,262 1,005,801 1,023,860 1,113,436 1,284,638 Utilities Cash - January 1 (1,119,055) 2,971,779 6,473,004 2,982,902 2,854,296 2,973,098 Net Income 3,100,834 3,257,135 3,601,863 3,840,047 4,152,615 4,490,138 CIP Expenditures (7,658,000) (10,846,500) (9,032,000) (9,229,000) (5,910,000) (9,200,000) Transfer Cash In /(Out) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) Other Cash Adjustment a 8,748,000 11,190,590 2,040,035 5,360,347 1,976,187 4,850,766 Cash - December 31 2,971,779 6,473,004 2,982,902 2,854,296 2,973,098 3,014,002 a. Other cash adjustments are due to differences between the full accrual basis of accounting used for enterprise funds under generally accepted accounting procedures (GAAP) and the cash basis of accounting used here to provide useful projections. Other cash adjustments may include bond proceeds and payments, depreciation, and other items. Page 11 This page left blank intentionally. • • L] • CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY 2008 -2012 EDINA CITY COUNCIL Mayor Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember James Hovland Joni Bennett Scot Housh Linda Masica Ann Swenson o� a y J .a . to CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT POLICY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). The goal of the City's CIP is to develop a comprehensive program for use by decision makers to guide capital investments based on an assessment of the community's needs, taking into account the best use of limited resources while providing efficient and effective municipal services. The City will develop a five -year plan for capital improvements and update it annually. The CIP process includes analyzing projects contributing to the public health and welfare, projects helping to maintain and improve the efficiency of the existing systems, and projects that define a future need within the community. The City will identify the estimated cost and potential funding sources for each capital project proposal in the CIP. Purchase contracts for equipment and projects included in the CIP must still be properly authorized. according to the City's Purchasing Policy. The CIP will include equipment and projects from any City fund, other than the equipment that falls under the Equipment Replacement Program. Adopted by City Council February 20, 2007 Revisions: March 20, 2007 Page 2 40 • • w9tr.f� CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA FINANCING ... CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM INTRODUCTION Planning for capital improvements requires sound and economical financing. The City of Edina is able to utilize several financing mechanisms ranging from cash reserves to special - purpose funds as well as borrowing through bond sales. The exact financing method for each improvement is based on the general policies, jurisdictions and legal requirements. The final selection and scheduling of proposed capital improvements is then based on the ability of the City to draw upon various funds. The total cost for each project includes construction costs, administration costs and interest. In analyzing the financial viability of the capital improvements in the current program, the following methods of financing were examined: INTERNAL METHODS: Special Assessments — Special assessments are based on the concept that when land is benefited from a particular improvement, all or part of the costs of the improvement should be levied against those properties to finance such improvements. Since it often takes several years for the City to collect special assessments, the City may decide to issue bonds for cash flow purposes. See Public Improvement Revolving Bonds for further description of this financing tool. Enterprise Funds — The City's enterprise funds include the Aquatic Center, Arena, Art Center, Edinborough & Centennial Lakes Parks, Golf Course, Golf Dome, Liquor Stores, and Utilities. Capital Improvements and equipment purchased in the enterprise funds may be financed through enterprise fund revenues derived from user charges for the respective services, when available. Enterprise funds are designed for self- sustaining operations. Page 3 A. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ,o a ; =� � u ..aui'!.f .. ED CfilY �' FINANCING • tittH f� CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM When an enterprise fund does not have enough cash to pay for a specific project, the City may decide to use money from another City source (usually the Construction Fund) or the City may decide to issue Enterprise Revenue Bonds. See below for further description of these financing methods. Tax Increment (TIF) Funds — These funds are derived from tax increment districts including 50th and France, Southeast Edina, Grandview, and 70th Street and Cahill Road. In tax increment districts, property owners pay ad valorem taxes at the full rate levied by the units of local government within the taxing jurisdiction. At the time the tax increment district is created, property values are "frozen ". The units of local government receive taxes based on the frozen property values. Any additional taxes paid by property owners based on the increase in property values since the district was created to is known as the "increment ". The increment revenue is then used to finance physical improvements within the district. The City may decide to issue Tax Increment Bonds for cash flow purposes, see below for further description of these bonds. Construction Fund — This fund is designed to provide financing for capital improvements. Revenues for this fund may be derived from such sources as investment income, rental income and transfers from other funds. Other — Other internal funding options available include tax levies, income on City investments, and reserves. • Page 4 w�1 A. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ! r '72 o a FINANCING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM EXTERNAL METHODS: Municipal State Aid (MSA) — The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) provides funding assistance for improvements to those municipal streets which are designated as part of its MSA system. Money for this fund is supplied with a dedicated portion of revenues collected from road use and gasoline taxes. Funds are released for improvements on those streets on the system whose design and construction meet MSA standards. Funds may be expended for any street on the MSA system at any time, and MSA funds may be accumulated over several years. Minnesota Department of Transportation - MnDOT provides financing assistance for maintenance and improvements on those highways included in the MnDOT trunk highway system and federal interstate system. These improvements could include intersecting local or 46 county streets. In the City of Edina, these highways are Nos. 62, 100, 169 and 494. Improvements on these highways must meet State trunk highway standards before MnDOT releases funds. • Other - Other external sources of financing include grants, donations, and other local governments. DEBT: Public Improvement Revolving (PIR) Bonds — PIR bonds are issued to provide immediate liquidity to complete public improvement projects and are repaid with special assessment receipts over a ten -year period. These bonds are supported through special assessments, therefore no levy is required. Page 5 CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA o e ,p 40 FINANCING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Enterprise Revenue Bonds — Most of the Enterprise Revenue Bonds that the City issues pay for Utility Fund project costs, but the City may issue Enterprise Revenue Bonds for any of our enterprises. These bonds are repaid with revenues from the enterprise facilities that benefit from the projects financed, therefore no levy is required. Tax Increment Bonds — The City may issue Tax Increment Bonds to pay project costs when the district does not have sufficient cash. These bonds are repaid with the Tax Increment revenue that is generated by the district; therefore no additional levy is required. Public Project Lease Revenue Bonds — This debt is issued through the Housing and Redevelopment Authority to procure capital equipment or facilities supported with a lease purchase relationship agreement with the City. These bonds are backed by the full faith and credit of the City and supported through an ad 40 valorem special levy by an annual appropriation. Capital Improvement Bonds - Capital Improvement bonds may be issued only for certain projects, including city halls, public safety buildings, public works facilities and libraries. These bonds are backed by the full faith and credit of the City and supported through the property tax levy. Other General Obligation (GO) — There are several other types of GO debt available for the City to use. Although no new issues are included in this plan, the City currently has park & recreation bonds and equipment certificates outstanding. Both of these types of GO debt require a levy. • Page 6 • J Jt'j .20 1 $100,000 $90,000 $80,000 $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 Ii $- L CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA FINANCING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM City of Edina Debt Current and Projected (in Thousands) • Enterprise Revenue ®Tax Increment ❑ Public Imp Revolving ■ Capital Improvement ❑ Public Project ■ General Obligation 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 This chart shows the projected effect on the City as a whole if future debt is issued according to this capital improvement plan. Page 7 This page left blank intentionally. 40 • • ;;`�4A, y)p • vr� 0 CI) 4v)) Financial Tables 46 A. CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA r4, o CONSTRUCTION FUND BALANCE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Projected Construction Fund Unreserved Fund Balance Expenditures Estimate Budget 545,000 Forecast 110,000 110,000 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Revenues 440,000 600,000 Public Safety 5,600,000 50,000 Intergovernmental $ 1,899,000 $ 1,664,440 $ 701,000 $ 966,000 $ 1,940,000 $ 604,000 Special Assessment 2,105,698 678,483 560,141 506,092 426,769 388,371 Interest (4.5 %) 138,838 160,102 120,222 112,769 112,087 123,961 Total Revenues 4,143,536 2,503,025 1,381,363 1,584,861 2,478,856 1,116,332 Expenditures Beginning Balance $ 3,160,085 $ 3,557,822 $ 2,671,607 $ 2,505,970 $ 2,490,831 $ 2,754,687 Ending Balance $ 3,557,822 $ 2,671,607 $ 2,505,970 $ 2,490,831 $ 2,754,687 $ 2,832,019 Construction Fund Unreserved Balance Trend $14,000,000 Last Ten Fiscal Years (Actual) and Next Five Fiscal Years (Estimate) $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $- 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 The charts above show the projected impact this CIP will have on the Construction Fund along with a ten -year history of Construction Fund balances. The 2002 balance was abnormally high due to a bond issue for City Hall, the majority of which wasn't spent until 2003. Page 9 General Government 110,000 545,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 Park & Rec 558,000 544,800 555,000 554,000 440,000 600,000 Public Safety 5,600,000 50,000 - 40,000 - - Public Works 9,103,000 18,792,800 6,286,000 5,890,000 8,350,000 6,248,000 Total Expenditures 15,371,000 19,932,600 6,951,000 6,594,000 8,900,000 6,958,000 Other Financing Sources /(Uses) Transfers In /(Out) 180,000 200,000 204,000 (345,000) 125,000 325,000 CIP Bonds 5,623,308 10,000,000 - - - - PIR Bonds Unidentified Funding 5,821,893 6,343,360 5,200,000 4,669,000 670,000 6,360,000 200,000 5,594,000 Total Other Sources 11,625,201 16,543,360 5,404,000 4,994,000 6,685,000 5,919,000 Increase (Decrease) $ 397,737 $ (886,215) $ (165,637) $ (15,139) $ 263,856 $ 77,332 Beginning Balance $ 3,160,085 $ 3,557,822 $ 2,671,607 $ 2,505,970 $ 2,490,831 $ 2,754,687 Ending Balance $ 3,557,822 $ 2,671,607 $ 2,505,970 $ 2,490,831 $ 2,754,687 $ 2,832,019 Construction Fund Unreserved Balance Trend $14,000,000 Last Ten Fiscal Years (Actual) and Next Five Fiscal Years (Estimate) $12,000,000 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $- 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 The charts above show the projected impact this CIP will have on the Construction Fund along with a ten -year history of Construction Fund balances. The 2002 balance was abnormally high due to a bond issue for City Hall, the majority of which wasn't spent until 2003. Page 9 A. vi Hr a V •� ar „n CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA ENTERPRISE FUND CASH BALANCES .CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Projected Enterprise Fund Cash Balances Page 10 • • • Estimate Budget Plan Aquatic Center 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Cash - January 1 805,626 903,900 1,003,581 1,070,569 1,119,126 (66,565) Net Income 58,274 54,681 27,488 (918) (30,640) (20,702) CIP Expenditures (30,000) (30,000) (40,000) (40,000) (1,250,000) (50,000) Transfer Cash In /(Out) - - - - - - Other Cash Adjustment a 70,000 75,000 79,500 89,475 94,949 100,946 Cash - December 31 903,900 1,003,581 1,070,569 1,119,126 (66,565) (36,321) Arena 2007 2008 2009 2010 2012 2012 Cash - January 1 29,766 15,359 (10,500) (34,609) 172,205 95,852 Net Income (194,407) (205,859) (208,709) (212,674) (306,026) (289,876) CIP Expenditures (25,000) (75,000) (116,000) (1,675,000) (275,000) (25,000) Transfer Cash In /(Out) 105,000 155,000 196,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 Other Cash Adjustment a 100,000 100,000 104,600 1,989,488 399,673 150,163 Cash - December 31 15,359 (10,500) (34,609) 172,205 95,852 36,139 Art Center 2007 2008 2009 2010 2012 2012 Cash - January 1 11,808 18,182 8,509 7,553 5,396 7,127 Net Income (159,626) (175,673) (177,886) (180,045) (182,144) (184,175) CIP Expenditures (70,000) (25,000) (5,000) (670,000) (200,000) - Transfer Cash In /(Out) 205,000 160,000 150,000 815,000 350,000 150,000 Other Cash Adjustment a 31,000 31,000 31,930 32,888 33,875 34,891 Cash - December 31 18,182 8,509 7,553 5,396 7,127 7,843 Edinborough /Centennial 2007 2008 2009 2010 2012 2012 Cash - January 1 4,314,937 4,045,746 3,287,638 2,411,744 722,229 296,473 Net Income (194,691) (291,108) (352,144) (387,278) (436,307) (481,847) CIP Expenditures (174,500) (572,000) (634,000) (1,418,000) (111,000) (204,500) Transfer Cash In /(Out) - - - - - - Other Cash Adjustment a 100,000 105,000 110,250 115,763 121,551 127,629 Cash - December 31 4,045,746 3,287,638 2,411,744 722,229 296,473 262,245 Page 10 • • • ,tA, CITY OF EDINA, MINNESOTA e � ENTERPRISE FUND CASH BALANCES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Projected Enterprise Fund 'Cash Balances Golf Course 2007 2008 2009 2010 2012 2012 Cash - January 1 (947,694) (1,266,350) (1,029,065) (739,147) (224,141) 70,535 Net Income 39,344 276,285 312,418 342,981 370,050 398,187 CIP Expenditures (243,000) (174,000) (253,000) (1,435,000) (265,000) (195,000) Transfer Cash In /(Out) - 170,000 170,000 170,000 170,000 170,000 Other Cash Adjustment a (115,000) (35,000) 60,500 1,437,025 19,626 (41,642) Cash - December 31 (1,266,350) (1,029,065) (739,147) (224,141) 70,535 402,080 Golf Dome 2007 2008 2009 2010 2012 2012 Cash - January 1 68,410 62,262 61,235 44,007 124,855 142,936 Net Income 32,852 56,973 65,422 73,130 79,978 87,289 CIP Expenditures - - (20,000) (200,000) (30,000) - Transfer Cash In/(Out) - - - - - Other Cash Adjustment a (39,000) (58,000) (62,650) 207,718 (31,897) (31,491) Cash - December 31 62,262 61,235 44,007 124,855 142,936 198,734 Liquor Stores 2007 2008 2009 2010 2012 2012 Cash - January 1 1,048,982 1,089,641 1,034,262 1,005,801 1,023,860 1,113,436 Net Income 1,158,475 1,233,019 1,318,861 1,409,870 1,506,335 1,608,564 CIP Expenditures (137,000) (95,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) Transfer Cash In/(Out) (1,061,200) (1,277,800) (1,335,100) (1,383,100) (1,411,700) (1,436,100) Other Cash Adjustment a 80,384 84,402 87,778 91,289 94,941 98,738 Cash - December 31 1,089,641 1,034,262 1,005,801 1,023,860 1,113,436 1,284,638 Utilities Cash - January 1 (1,119,055) 2,971,779 6,473,004 '2,982,902 2,854,296 2,973,098 Net Income 3,100,834 3,257,135 3,601,863 3,840,047 4,152,615 4,490,138 CIP Expenditures (7,658,000) (10,846,500) (9,032,000) (9,229,000) (5,910,000) (9,200,000) Transfer Cash In /(Out) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) (100,000) Other Cash Adjustment a 8,748,000 11,190,590 2,040,035 5,360,347 1,976,187 4,850,766 Cash - December 31 2,971,779 6,473,004 2,982,902 2,854,296 2,973,098 3,014,002 a. Other cash adjustments are due to differences between the full accrual basis of accounting used for enterprise funds under generally accepted accounting procedures (GAAP) and the cash basis of accounting used here to provide useful projections. and payments, depreciation, and other items. Other cash adjustments may include bond proceeds Page 11 This page left blank intentionally. to • City of Edina, MN Capital Improvement Program 2008 thru 2012 PROJECTS BY DEPARTMENT Department Project# Priority 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total A uatic Center Flowrider AOC-03 -001 n/a 1,200,000 1,200,000 Upgrades and Replacements AQC- 08-001 n/a 30,000 40,000 40,000 50,000 50,000 210,000 Aquatic Center Total 30,000 40,000 40,000 1,250,000 50,000 1,410,000 Arena Replace Zamboni A- 00-006 n/a 90,000 90,000 Refurbish West Arena A- 04-001 n/a 1,200,000 1,200,000 Dehumidification System A -07 -002 n/a 150,000 150,000 300,000 Repairs & Maintenance A- 08-001 n/a 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 100,000 Arena Lighting A -08 -002 n/a 50,000 50,000 Truck with Plow A- 08-003 n/a 26,000 26,000 Parking Lot Repair A -08-004 n/a 100,000 100,000 Install Underground Irrigation A- 08-005 n/a 100,000 100,000 Building Facade A- 08-006 n/a 100,000 100,000 Replace Building Skate Tile A- 08-007 n/a 100,000 100,000 Arena Total 75,000 116,000 1,675,000 275,000 25,000 2,166,000 Art Center Main Office Remodel Art Center ART -00 -005 n/a 10,000 10,000 Parking Lot Expansion ART -01 -001 n/a 70,000 70,000 Cleaning Equipment ART -07 -001 n/a 5,000 5,000 Building Expansion ART -07 -002 n/a 600,000 200,000 800,000 Replace Phone System ART -08 -001 n/a 15,000 15,000 Art Center Total 25,000 5,000 670,000 200,000 900,000 Building Inspections Complaint Administration Software BD-06 -001 n/a 35,000 35,000 Building Inspections Total 35,000 35,000 Citywide Citywide Fiber Optic Cabling CW -02 -001 2 275,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 575,000 Phone System Replacement CW -06-001 3 200,000 200,000 Citywide Total 475,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 775,000 Edinborough /Centennial EP Replaster Pool ECL-00-017 n/a 60,000 60,000 EP Adventure Peak Remodel Improvement ECL -03 -007 We 50,000 50,000 Page 13 Department Project# Priority 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total CL Paint Park Fixtures ECL -03 -009 We EP Replace Great Hall Floor ECL -03 -011 n/a CL Replace Utility Vehicle ECL -04-004 n/a CL Bridge to Clubhouse ECL -04 -005 n/a CL Fountain ECL -04-006 n/a EP Replace PoolPac Unit ECL -06-003 n/a CL Paver Replacement ECL -06-004 n/a CL Replace HVAC Units ECL -06-005 We EP Theater Curtain and Rigging ECL -06-006 n/a EP Replace Carpeting ECL - 06-007 n/a CL Paint Amphitheater Structure ECL -07 -003 n/a CL Signage improvement ECL -07 -004 n/a EP Enclose Rear of Theater ECL -07 -005 n/a EP Adventure Peak Renovation ECL -07 -006 n/a EP Floor Scrubber ECL -07 -007 n/a EP Replace Gym Curtain ECL -07 -008 n/a CL Replace Centrum Building Roof ECL - 08-001 n/a CL Replace Centrum Pavers ECL -08-002 n/a CL Paint South Park Railings ECL -08 -003 n/a CL Renovate Putting Greens ECL -08 -004 n/a CL Replace Cracked/Broken Concrete ECL -08-005 n/a EP Security Camera System ECL -08-007 n/a EP Concrete - Main Entrance ECL -08-008 n/a EP Torrent Floor Machine ECL -08-009 n/a EP Renovate NE Entrance ECL -08 -010 n/a EP Soft Play for Great Hall ECL -08 -011 n/a EP Convert Kitchen to Restrooms ECL -08 -012 n/a EP Fire Panel ECL -08-013 n/a EP Truck ECL -08-014 n/a EP Office Security Cameras ECL -08-015 n/a EP Park Sound System ECL -08 -016 n/a EP Water Heater & Holding Tanks ECL -08 -017 n/a EP HVAC Rooftop Units ECL -08-018 n/a EP Weight & Aerobic Equipment ECL -08-019 n/a EP Climbing Wall ECL -08-020 n/a EP Pool and Wall Tile ECL -08 -021 n/a Edinborougb/Centennial Total 8,000 Golf Course 175,000 Driving Range Renovation GC-02 -001 n/a Cart Path Renovation GC-03 -002 n/a Parking Lot Resurfacing GC-06 -001 n/a Maintenance Equipment: Braemar GC- 08-001 n/a Miscellaneous Equipment: Braemar GC-08 -002 We Golf Course Total 28,000 28,000 Golf Dome Upgrade Electrical Service & Lighting GD- 00-001 We Propane Back -up Inflation System GD- 04-001 n/a Upgrade Building/Restrooms GD-08 -001 n/a Golf Dome Total 25,000 25,000 45,000 45,000 12,000 12,000 40,000 40,000 8,000 8,000 160,000 160,000 40,000 40,000 22,000 22,000 14,000 14,000 12,000 12,000 16,000 16,000 20,000 20,000 12,000 12,000 60,000 60,000 7,000 7,000 8,000 8,000 175,000 175,000 15,000 15,000 28,000 28,000 40,000 40,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 25,000 25,000 7,500 7,500 1,000,000 1,000,000 100,000 100,000 70,000 50,000 50,000 70,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 30,000 30,000 24,000 24,000 500,000 500,000 100,000 100,000 20,000 20,000 80,000 80,000 572,000 634,000 1,418,000 111,000 204,500 2,939,500 900,000 900,000 275,000 275,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 225,000 137,000 140,000 145,000 150,000 155,000 727,000 37,000 38,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 195,000 174,000 253,000 1,435,000 265,000 195,000 2,322,000 30,000 30,000 20,000 20,000 200,000 200,000 20,000 200,000 30,000 250,000 Page 14 Department Project# Priority 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total Li uor Stores 10,000 50th: Tile In Front of Beer Cooler LIO- 00-015 50th: Replace carpet LIO -01 -001 50th: Replace 2 Compressors LIG -01 -002 50th: Store Remodel LIO -02 -005 All 3 Stores: Repairs & Maintenance LIO- 08-001 Liquor Stares Total 150,000 Municipal Buildings 150,000 Public Works Building MB-04 -001 City Hall/Public Works Building MB -08-001 Municipal Buildings Total Park & Recreation 138,000 Pathway Repairs/Additions: Arneson Acres PK -00-028 Parking Lot: Weber Park PK -00-035 Playground: McGuire Park PK -00-037 Playground: Pamela Park PK -00-039 Renovate softball field: Todd Park PK -01 -001 Renovate west baseball field: Countryside Park PK -01 -004 Playground: Chowen Park PK- 02-041 Playground: York Park PK -02 -042 Batting/Pitching Cages - Pamela Park PK -04-001 Hockey Rink Relocation - Walnut Ridge Park PK -04-003 Off -Leash Dog Park - France Avenue Site PK -05-006 New Park Pathway - Garden Park PK- 05-007 Pathway Renovation - Todd Park PK -05-009 Replace Playground Equipment - Countryside Park PK -05-010 Window Replacement - Arneson Acres Park PK -07 -002 New Athletic Field With Lights - Pamela Park PK -07 -004 Concrete Maintenance Apron - Pamela Park PK -08-001 Softball Field Fencing - Pamela Park PK -08-002 Softball Field Lighting - Pamela Park PK -08-003 Neighborhood Park - Van Valkenburg Park PK -08 -004 Soccer /Football Field Lighting - Pamela Park PK -08-005 Park & Recreation Total 11,000 Public Safety 30,000 In -Squad Video System PS -01 -003 Outdoor Warning System PS -02 -004 Public Safety Total Public Works n/a 10,000 10,000 n/a 10,000 10,000 n/a 16,000 16,000 n/a 75,000 75,000 n/a 84,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 384,000 95,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 495,000 n/a 10,000,000 10,000,000 n/a 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 175,000 10,035,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 10,175,000 n/a 45,000 n/a 45,000 n/a 38,800 n/a Concrete Rehab: Tracy Ave. (Vernon - TH62) 38,800 n/a 120,000 Bridge: Browndale Bridge PW -00 -028 120,000 n/a 150,000 n/a 150,000 n/a n/a 91,000 91,000 n/a 138,000 138,000 n/a 120,000 120,000 n/a 120,000 120,000 n/a 30,000 30,000 n/a 90,000 90,000 n/a 40,000 40,000 n/a 145,000 145,000 n1a 45,000 45,000 n/a 110,000 110,000 n/a 10,000 10,000 n/a 400,000 400,000 n/a 11,000 11,000 n/a 30,000 30,000 60,000 n/a 250,000 250,000 n/a 600,000 600,000 n/a 80,000 80,000 544,800 555,000 554,000 440,000 600,000 2,693,800 n/a n/a Mill & Overlay: Benton Ave. (Hansen - Hwy 100) PW -00 -004 n/a Reconstruct: 44th Ave. (TH 100 - France) PW -00 -012 n/a Concrete Rehab: Tracy Ave. (Vernon - TH62) PW -00 -015 n/a Bridge: Browndale Bridge PW -00 -028 n/a Bridge: 56th Street Bridge PW -00 -029 n/a Concrete Rehab: Parklawn Ave. (France to W 77) PW -00 -074 n/a 50,000 50,000 40,000 40,000 50,000 40,000 90,000 180,000 180,000 800,000 800,000 445,000 445,000 380,000 380,000 250,000 250,000 340,000 340,000 Page 15 Department Project# Priority 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total Reconstruct: W 70th St. & Metro Blvd. PW -01 -010 n/a 1,686,800 1,686,800 Reconstruct: W 62nd St. (Oaklawn - France) PW -01 -011 n/a 468,000 468,000 Public Works: Braemar Cold Storage: Improvements PW -02 -006 n/a 40,000 40,000 Signals: W 50th St & Dale Ave PW -03 -002 n/a 180,000 180,000 Mill & Overlay: Blake Rd (Vernon to Interlachen) PW -03 -003 n/a 319,000 319,000 Reconstruct: Valley View Rd (Gleason to Antrim) PW -05-004 n/a 1,100,000 1,100,000 Sidewalk / Pathway: W Fmtg Rd TH100 PW -07 -003 n/a 220,000 220,000 Northeast Edina Traffic Calming PW -07 -004 n/a 190,000 357,000 205,000 752,000 Neighborhood Street Recon. Program PW -08 -001 n/a 6,106,000 5,200,000 4,440,000 5,830,000 5,500,000 27,076,000 Sidewalks/Pathways (MSA) PW -08 -002 n/a 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Sidewalks/Pathways: City Costs PW -08 -003 n/a 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Braemar Cold Storage - Fire Suppression PW -08 -004 n/a 70,000 70,000 Skid Steer PW -08 -005 n/a 60,000 60,000 Reconstruct / Sidewalk: W Rd at Braemar Blvd PW -08 -006 n/a 700,000 700,000 Public Works Total 6,792,800 6,286,000 5,890,000 8,350,000 6,248,000 35,566,800 Utility Department Watermain /Sanitary: Country Club Area UT -00-020 1 4,252,000 2,252,000 2,000,000 8,504,000 Storrs water Lift Station (Highlands Lake) UT -02 -003 n/a 75,000 75,000 Well #11 (4500 West 76th Street) UT -02 -015 n/a 120,000 120,000 Lift Station #1 (4041 Sunnyside Road) UT -03 -010 n/a 130,000 130,000 1998 Cat Backhoe Replacement UT -03 -012 n/a 160,000 160,000 Well #2 (4521 West 50th Street) UT -03 -015 n/a 50,000 50,000 GPS System UT -03 -016 3 12,000 12,000 Well No. 7 Treatment UT -03 -017 n/a 60,000 60,000 Public Works: Braemar Work Site - Lead Removal UT -04-005 n/a 200,000 200,000 Lift Station #3 Generator Replacement UT -05-002 2 80,000 80,000 Sewer Televising Equipment UT -05-003 3 130,000 130,000 Storrs Water Lift Station #12 Improvement UT -05-006 3 7,500 7,500 Lift Station #2 (4200 Grimes Ave) UT -05-008 2 100,000 100,000 Lift Station #7 (4021 Grimes Ave) UT -05-009 2 120,000 120,000 Lift Station #8 (4023 Monterey Ave) UT -05-010 2 120,000 120,000 Lift Station #20 (5901 West 62nd St) UT -05-011 2 100,000 100,000 Well #13 (6721 2nd St.) UT -05-012 2 150,000 150,000 Well #6 (5849 Ruth St) UT -05-013 2 100,000 100,000 New Water Treatment Plant ( #5) UT -07 -002 2 1,600,000 2,500,000 3,500,000 7,600,000 New Water Treatment Plant (#6) UT -07 -003 2 600,000 3,600,000 4,200,000 New Well ( #21) UT -07 -005 2 350,000 350,000 Water Meter Reading System Replacement UT -07 -007 1 40,000 40,000 Gleason Water Tower (paint) UT -07 -009 2 500,000 500,000 WTP #3 Chemical Room Expansion UT -07 -010 2 200,000 200,000 Sanitary Sewer Grit Disposal Facility UT -07 -011 2 65,000 65,000 Watermain Extension - Woodland Circle UT 707 -013 n/a 150,000 150,000 Water System Improvements UT -08 -001 n/a 350,000 350,000 450,000 300,000 450,000 1,900,000 Sanitary Sewer Improvements UT -08-002 n/a 650,000 600,000 550,000 600,000 600,000 3,000,000 Pond & Lake Dredging UT -08-003 3 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 1,500,000 1,740,000 Storm Sewer- Pipe and Grading Improvements UT -08 -004 n/a 2,200,000 2,100,000 1,644,000 2,200,000 800,000 8,944,000 Annual Vehicle Replacements UT -08 -005 3 60,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 400,000 610,000 SCADA Upgrades UT- 08-006 2 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Lift Station #6 Odor Control Media Replacement UT -08-007 2 60,000 60,000 Piping Wells #5 and #18 to WTP #5 UT -08-008 2 450,000 450,000 Well #5 (West 69th Street) UT- 08-009 2 100,000 100,000 Piping Wells #9, #15, and #21 to WTP #6 UT -08 -010 2 1,200,000 1,200,000 Lift Station #6 Motor Starter Replacements UT -08-011 2 10,000 10,000 Page 16 Department Project# Priority 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total • 1 Page 17 Lift Station #6 Redundant 70 HP pump and VFD UT -08-012 2 60,000 60,000 Momingside Waterrnain Lining Project UT -08-013 1 480,000 470,000 420,000 1,370,000 Trunk Sanitary Sewer Lining Project UT -08-014 n/a 1,200,000 1,200,000 Utility Department Total 10,846,500 9,032,000 9,229,000 5,910,000 9,200,000 44,217,500 GRAND TOTAL 31,750,100 17,151,000 21,361,000 17,041,000 16,732,500 104,035,600 • 1 Page 17 • This page left blank intentionally. 40 • City of Edina, MN Capital Improvement Program 2008 thru 2012 PROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE Source Project# Priority 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total lAquatic Center Fund Flowrider AOC- 03-001 n/a 1,200,000 1,200,000 Upgrades and Replacements AOC- 08-001 n/a 30,000 40,000 40,000 50,000 50,000 210,000 Aquatic Center Fund Total 30,000 40,000 40,000 1,250,000 50,000 1,410,000 Capital Improvement Bonds Public Works Building MB-04 -001 n/a 10,000,000 10,000,000 Capital Improvement Bonds Total 10,000,000 10,000,000 Construction Fund Replace Zamboni A -00-006 n/a 90,000 90,000 Repairs & Maintenance A- 08-001 n/a 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 100,000 Arena Lighting A- 08-002 n/a 50,000 50,000 Truck with Plow A -08 -003 n/a 26,000 26,000 Main Office Remodel Art Center ART -00 -005 n/a 10,000 10,000 Cleaning Equipment ART -07 -001 n/a 5,000 5,000 Replace Phone System ART -08 -001 n/a 15,000 15,000 Complaint Administration Software BD- 06-001 n/a 35,000 35,000 Citywide Fiber Optic Cabling CW -02 -001 2 275,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 575,000 Phone System Replacement CW -06-001 3 200,000 200,000 City HaIVPublic Works Building MB- 08-001 n/a 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,000 175,000 Pathway Repairs/Additions: Arneson Acres PK -00-028 n/a 45,000 45,000 Parking Lot: Weber Park PK -00-035 n/a 38,800. 38,800 Playground: McGuire Park PK -00-037 n/a 120,000 120,000 Playground: Pamela Park PK -00-039 n/a 150,000 150,000 Renovate softball field: Todd Park PK -01 -001 n/a 91,000 91,000 Renovate west baseball field: Countryside Park PK -01 -004 n/a 138,000 138,000 Playground: Chowen Park PK -02-041 n/a 120,000 120,000 Playground: York Park PK -02-042 n/a 120,000 120,000 Batting/Pitching Cages - Pamela Park PK -04-001 n/a 30,000 30,000 Hockey Rink Relocation - Walnut Ridge Park PK -04-003 n/a 90,000 90,000 Off -Leash Dog Park - France Avenue Site PK -05-006 n/a 40,000 40,000 New Park Pathway - Garden Park PK -05-007 n/a 145,000 145,000 Pathway Renovation -Todd Park PK -05-009 n/a 45,000 45,000 Replace Playground Equipment - Countryside Park PK -05-010 n/a 110,000 110,000 Window Replacement - Arneson Acres Park PK -07 -002 n/a 10,000 10,000 New Athletic Field With Lights - Pamela Park PK -07 -004 n/a 400,000 400,000 Concrete Maintenance Apron - Pamela Park PK -08 -001 n/a 11,000 11,000 Softball Field Fencing - Pamela Park PK -08 -002 n/a 30,000 30,000 60,000 Softball Field Lighting - Pamela Park PK -08 -003 n/a 250,000 250,000 •Neighborhood Park - Van Valkenburg Park PK -08 -004 n/a 600,000 600,000 Soccer /Football Field Lighting - Pamela Park PK -08 -005 n/a 80,000 80,000 Page 19 Source Project# Priority- 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total In-Squad Video System PS -01 -003 n/a 50,000 EP Adventure Peak Remodel Improvement ECL -03 -007 50,000 Outdoor Warning System PS -02 -004 n/a 40,000 40,000 Bridge: Browndale Bridge PW -00 -028 n/a 330,000 330,000 Public Works: Braemar Cold Storage: Improvements PW -02 -006 n/a 40,000 ECL -03 -011 n/a 40,000 Sidewalk / Pathway: W Fmtg Rd TH100 PW -07 -003 n/a 220,000 45,000 220,000 Northeast Edina Traffic Calming PW -07 -004 nla 75,000 275,000 205,000 555,000 Sidewalks/Pathways: City Costs PW -08 -003 nla 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Braemar Cold Storage - Fire Suppression PW -08 -004 n/a 70,000 CL Fountain 70,000 Skid Steer PW -08 -005 n/a 60,000 60,000 Construction Fund Total EP Replace PoolPac Unit 2,024,800 1,171,000 984,000 625,000 785,000 5,589,800 EdinborouQh /Centennial Fund EP Replaster Pool ECL -00 -017 n/a 60,000 60,000 EP Adventure Peak Remodel Improvement ECL -03 -007 n/a 50,000 50,000 CL Paint Park Fixtures ECL -03 -009 n/a 25,000 25,000 EP Replace Great Hall Floor ECL -03 -011 n/a 45,000 45,000 CL Replace Utility Vehicle ECL -04 -004 n/a 12,000 12,000 CL Bridge to Clubhouse ECL -04 -005 n/a 40,000 40,000 CL Fountain ECL -04 -006 n/a 8,000 8,000 EP Replace PoolPac Unit ECL - 06-003 n/a 160,000 160,000 CL Paver Replacement ECL -06-004 n/a 40,000 40,000 CL Replace HVAC Units ECL -06-005 n/a 22,000 22,000 EP Theater Curtain and Rigging ECL -06-006 n/a 14,000 14,000 EP Replace Carpeting ECL -06-007 n/a 12,000 12,000 CL Paint Amphitheater Structure ECL -07 -003 n/a 16,000 16,000 CL Signage improvement ECL -07 -004 n/a 20,000 20,000 EP Enclose Rear of Theater ECL -07 -005 n/a 12,000 12,000 EP Adventure Peak Renovation ECL -07 -006 n/a 60,000 60,000 EP Floor Scrubber ECL -07 -007 n/a 7,000 7,000 EP Replace Gym Curtain ECL -07 -008 n/a 8,000 8,000 CL Replace Centrum Building Roof ECL -08 -001 n/a 175,000 175,000 CL Replace Centrum Pavers ECL -08 -002 n/a 15,000 15,000 CL Paint South Park Railings ECL -08 -003 n/a 28,000 28,000 CL Renovate Putting Greens ECL -08 -004 n/a 40,000 40,000 CL Replace Cracked/Broken Concrete ECL -08 -005 n/a 12,000 12,000 EP Security Camera System ECL -08 -007 n/a 12,000 12,000 EP Concrete - Main Entrance ECL -06 -008 n/a 25,000 25,000 EP Torrent Floor Machine ECL -08 -009 n/a 7,500 7,500 EP Renovate NE Entrance ECL -08 -010 n/a 1,000,000 1,000,000 EP Soft Play for Great Hall ECL -08 -011 nla 100,000 100,000 EP Convert Kitchen to Restrooms ECL -08 -012 n/a 50,000 50,000 EP Fire Panel ECL -08 -013 n/a 70,000 70,000 EP Truck ECL -08 -014 n/a 20,000 20,000 EP Office Security Cameras ECL -08 -015 n/a 20,000 20,000 EP Park Sound System ECL -08 -016 n/a 30,000 30,000 EP Water Heater & Holding Tanks ECL -08 -017 n/a 24,000 24,000 EP HVAC Rooftop Units ECL -08 -018 n/a 500,000 500,000 EP Weight & Aerobic Equipment ECL -08 -019 n/a 100,000 100,000 EP Climbing Wall ECL -08 -020 n/a 20,000 20,000 EP Pool and Wall Tile ECL -08 -021 n/a 80,000 80,000 Edinborough/Centennial Fund Total 572,000 634,000 1,418,000 111,000 204,500 2,939,500 Page 20 Source Project# Priority 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total Golf Course Fund Maintenance Equipment: Braemar GC-08 -001 nfa 137,000 140,000 145,000 150,000 155,000 727,000 Miscellaneous Equipment: Braemar GC -08 -002 n/a 37,000 38,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 195,000 Golf Course Fund Total 237,360 Reconstruct: W 62nd St. (Oaklawn - France) 174,000 178,000 185,000 190,000 195,000 922,000 Golf Dome Fund 300,000 300,000 abNeighborhood Street Recon. Program PW -08 -001 n/a 6,106,000 5,200,000 4,440,000 5,830,000 5,500,000 27,076,000 Reconstruct/ Sidewalk: W Rd at Braemar Blvd Upgrade Electrical Service & Lighting GD- 00-001 n/a 140,000 30,000 30,000 Propane Back -up Inflation System GD- 04-001 n/a 20,000 20,000 Golf Dome Fund Total 20,000 30,000 50,000 Liquor Fund 50th: Tile In Front of Beer Cooler LIO-00 -015 n/a 10,000 10,000 50th: Replace carpet LIQ-01 -001 n/a 10,000 10,000 50th: Replace 2 Compressors LIO-01 -002 n/a 16,000 16,000 50th: Store Remodel LIO -02 -005 n/a 75,000 75,000 All 3 Stores: Repairs & Maintenance LIQ-08 -001 n/a 84,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 384,000 Liquor Fund Total 95,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 495,000 Municipal State Aid Mill & Overlay: Benton Ave. (Hansen - Hwy 100) PW -00 -004 n/a 180,000 180,000 Reconstruct: 44th Ave. (TH 100 - France) PW -00 -012 n/a 640,000 640,000 Concrete Rehab: Tracy Ave. (Vernon - TH62) PW -00 -015 n/a 356,000 356,000 Concrete Rehab: Parklawn Ave. (France to W 77) PW -00 -074 n/a 270,000 270,000 Reconstruct: W 70th St. & Metro Blvd. PW -01 -010 n/a 1,449,440 1,449,440 Reconstruct: W 62nd St. (Oaklawn - France) PW -01 -011 n/a 374,000 374,000 Signals: W 50th St & Dale Ave PW -03 -002 n/a 180,000 180,000 Mill & Overlay: Blake Rd (Vernon to Interlachen) PW -03 -003 n/a 319,000 319,000 Reconstruct Valley View Rd (Gleason to Antrim) PW -05-004 n/a 800,000 800,000 Northeast Edina Traffic Calming PW -07 -004 n/a 115,000 82,000 197,000 Sidewalks/Pathways (MSA) PW -08 -002 n/a 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 Reconstruct / Sidewalk: W Rd at Braemar Blvd PW -08 -006 n/a 560,000 560,000 Municipal State Aid Total 1,614,440 451,000 966,000 1,940,000 604,000 5,575,440 Other External - Watershed District Bridge: Browndale Bridge PW -00 -028 n/a 50,000 50,000 Other External - Watershed District 50,000 50,000 Total Public Improvement Revolvine Bonds Reconstruct: 44th Ave. (TH 100 - France) PW -00 -012 n/a 160,000 160,000 Concrete Rehab: Tracy Ave. (Vernon - TH62) PW -00 -015 n/a 89,000 89,000 Concrete Rehab: Paridawn Ave. (France to W 77) PW -00 -074 n/a 70,000 70,000 Reconstruct: W 70th St. & Metro Blvd. PW -01 -010 n/a 237,360 237,360 Reconstruct: W 62nd St. (Oaklawn - France) PW -01 -011 n/a 94,000 94,000 Reconstruct: Valley View Rd (Gleason to Antrim) PW -05 -004 n/a 300,000 300,000 abNeighborhood Street Recon. Program PW -08 -001 n/a 6,106,000 5,200,000 4,440,000 5,830,000 5,500,000 27,076,000 Reconstruct/ Sidewalk: W Rd at Braemar Blvd PW -08 -006 n/a 140,000 140,000 Page 21 Source Project# Priority 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 ' Total Public Improvement Revolving Bonds Total Revenue Bonds Refurbish West Arena A- 04-001 Dehumidification System A -07 -002 Parking Lot Repair A -08-004 Install Underground Irrigation A- 08-005 Building Fagade A- 08-006 Replace Building Skate Tile A- 08-007 Driving Range Renovation GC-02 -001 Cart Path Renovation GC-03 -002 Parking Lot Resurfacing GG06 -001 Upgrade Building/Restrooms GD -08 -001 Revenue Bonds Total UT -07 -011 State Bridge Bond Bridge: 56th Street Bridge PW -00 -029 State Bridge Bond Total Unfunded Parking Lot Expansion ART -01 -001 Building Expansion ART -07 -002 Unfunded Total Utility Funds - San Swr 1,200,000 Watennain /Sanitary: Country Club Area UT -00-020 Lift Station #1 (4041 Sunnyside Road) UT -03 -010 GPS System UT -03 -016 Lift Station #3 Generator Replacement UT -05-002 Sewer Televising Equipment UT- 05-003 Lift Station #2 (4200 Grimes Ave) UT- 05-008 Lift Station #7 (4021 Grimes Ave) UT- 05-009 Lift Station #8 (4023 Monterey Ave) UT -05-010 Lift Station #20 (5901 West 62nd St) UT -05-011 Sanitary Sewer Grit Disposal Facility UT -07 -011 Sanitary Sewer Improvements UT -08-002 Lift Station #6 Odor Control Media Replacement UT -08-007 Lift Station #6 Motor Starter Replacements UT -08-011 Lift Station #6 Redundant 70 HP pump and VFD UT -08-012 Trunk Sanitary Sewer Lining Project UT -08-014 Utility Funds - San Swr Total Utilitv Funds - Stm Swr Stone water Lift Station (Highlands Lake) UT -02 -003 Storm Water Lift Station #12 Improvement UT -05-006 Pond & Lake Dredging UT -06 -003 Storm Sewer - Pipe and Grading Improvements UT -08 -004 6,343,360 5,200,000 4,669,000 6,360,000 5,594,000 28,166,360 0 n/a 1,200,000 1,126,000 1,200,000 n/a 150,000 150,000 300,000 n/a 100,000 100,000 n/a 100,000 3 100,000 n/a 100,000 100,000 n/a 2 100,000 100,000 n/a 900,000 900,000 n/a 275,000 275,000 n/a 75,000 75,000 75,000 225,000 n/a 200,000 200,000 75,000 3,100,000 325,000 3,500,000 n/a 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000 n/a 70,000 70,000 n/a 600,000 200,000 800,000 670,000 200,000 870,000 40 1 2,126,000 1,126,000 1,000,000 4,252,000 n/a 130,000 130,000 3 12,000 12,000 2 80,000 80,000 3 130,000 130,000 2 100,000 100,000 2 120,000 120,000 2 120,000 120,000 2 100,000 100,000 2 65,000 65,000 n/a 650,000 600,000 550,000 600,000 600,000 3,000,000 2 60,000 60,000 2 10,000 10,000 2 60,000 60,000 n/a 1,200,000 1,200,000 3,133,000 2,076,000 1,830,000 600,000 1,800,000 9,439,000 n/a 75,000 75,000 3 7,500 7,500 3 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 1,500,000 1,740,000 n/a 2,200,000 2,100,000 1,644,000 2,200,000 800,000 8,944,000 Page 22 Source Project# Priority, 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Total GRAND TOTAL L] Utility Funds - Stm Swr Total 2,160,000 1,779,000 2,260,000 2,300,000 Utili ty Funds - Wtr 1 Watermain/Sanitary: Country Club Area UT -00-020 1,000,000 Well #11 (4500 West 76th Street) UT -02 -015 4,252,000 1998 Cat Backhoe Replacement UT -03 -012 Well #2 (4521 West 50th Street) UT -03 -015 Well No. 7 Treatment UT -03 -017 Public Works: Braemar Work Site - Lead Removal UT -04 -005 Well #13 (6721 2nd St.) UT- 05-012 n/a Well #6 (5849 Ruth St) UT -05-013 50,000 New Water Treatment Plant ( #5) UT -07 -002 50,000 New Water Treatment Plant (#6) UT -07 -003 New Well ( #21) UT -07 -005 Water Meter Reading System Replacement UT- 07-007 Gleason Water Tower (paint) UT -07 -009 WTP #3 Chemical Room Expansion UT -07 -010 2 Watenmain Extension - Woodland Circle UT -07 -013 Water System Improvements UT -08-001 150,000 Annual Vehicle Replacements UT -08-005 SCADA Upgrades UT -08-006 Piping Wells #5 and #18 to WTP #5 UT -08-008 1,600,000 Well #5 (West 69th Street) UT -08 -009 Momingside Watermain Lining Project UT -08 -013 2 Utility Funds - Wtr Total 600,000 3,600,000 Watershed District 2 Piping Wells #9, #15, and #21 to WTP 06 UT -08 -010 Watershed District Total GRAND TOTAL L] Page 23 2,267,500 2,160,000 1,779,000 2,260,000 2,300,000 10,766,500 1 2,126,000 1,126,000 1,000,000 4,252,000 n/a 120,000 120,000 n/a 160,000 160,000 n/a 50,000 50,000 n/a 60,000 60,000 n/a 200,000 200,000 2 150,000 150,000 2 100,000 100,000 2 1,600,000 2,500,000 3,500,000 7,600,000 2 600,000 3,600,000 4,200,000 2 350,000 350,000 1 40,000 40,000 2 500,000 500,000 2 200,000 200,000 n/a 150,000 150,000 n/a 350,000 350,000 450,000 300,000 450,000 1,900,000 3 60,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 400,000 610,000 2 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 250,000 2 450,000 450,000 2 100,000 100,000 1 480,000 470,000 420,000 1,370,000 5,446,000 4,796,000 5,620,000 1,850,000 5,100,000 22,812000 2 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 1,200,000 31,750,100 17,151,000 21,361,000 17,041,000 16,732,500 104,035,600 Page 23 This page left blank intentionally. • • Deb Mangen 'nom: Jennifer Bennerotte ,ent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 10:51 AM Cc: Deb Mangen; Jack Sullivan Subject: FW: [save7Oth.org] Cornelia Neighborhood Response to SAC proposals Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 -826 -0390 jbennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us V r h' oeo fail - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Jonathan Fernands [mailto:jfernands @yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 9:21 AM To: JOSH SPRAGUE Cc: Jennifer Bennerotte; sen.geoff.michel @senate.mn Subject: Re: [save70th.org] Cornelia Neighborhood Response to SAC proposals Note to City of Edina Staff: Please forward this message to Mayor Hovland, Members of the City Council, Commissioner Wanniger and Wayne Houle. Josh -- appreciate most of the thoughts you laid out in your letter to the Edina council Aembers, ETC /SAC members and Senator Michel Dated December 17, 2007. I agree with much of what you wrote. However, I strongly disagree with your recommendation that articulates the installation of stoplight at the intersection of West Shore Drive and W. 70th street. Instead, I support the use of a roundabout solution at that intersection. Sincerely, Jonathan Fernands 6905 West Shore Drive - - - -- Original Message - - -- From: JOSH SPRAGUE <josh @joshsprague.com> To: Joe Florenzano <cardflo @aol.com> Cc: save70th <save70th @googlegroups.com >; save70thboard < save70thboard @googlegroups.com> Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 4:11:52 PM Subject: [save70th.org] Cornelia Neighborhood Response to SAC proposals Edina council members and staff, ETC /SAC chairs and members, and honorable Senator Michel: Attached please find a PDF of our response to the 70th Street Study Advisory Committee's draft Segment Alternatives for Future 70th Street. You can also find this under "Key Documents for Review" at our website, http: / /save70th.org. Respectfully, JS josh sprague, chair greater w 70th st homeowners ass'n 4720 70th st w cell 612.501.0252 1 josh@joshsprague.com You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "save70th" group. To post to this group, send email to save70th@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to save70th- unsubscribe @googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http: / /groups.google.com /group /save7oth ?hl =en Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page. http: / /www.yahoo.com /r /hs 2 Deb Mangen From: Jennifer Bennerotte it: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 1:20 PM _ Deb Mangen Subject: FW: Morningside Water Update %NA C/ � T �eL Jennifer Bennerotte F� Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 jennerotte@ci.edina.mn.us From: Julie Banker [mailto:mnbankers @gmaii.com] Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 1:13 PM To: mnbankers @gmail.com Subject: Morningside Water Update Dear Mayor and Council Members, ,vould like to thank you for your recent support regarding the poor water quality we have experienced in Northern Morningside. We would also like to take this opportunity to provide an update regarding the progress that has been made toward a solution to this problem. Since the City Council report in early November, the city has been running a hydrant in the area continuously to maintain water flow and flushing to the area. This has resulted in a marked improvement in the water quality, both visually and based on repeat test results. We have attached those results. It does appear City staff continue to work towards a plan to reline the pipes starting in the spring and we look forward to upcoming updates on that process. The City has committed to monitoring the water quality on a weekly basis and will continue the constant flushing at the hydrant. We have asked the City to conduct additional tests for heavy metals in the pipes. The pipe analysis done on the section of pipe taken from Lynn Avenue indicated elevated levels of aluminum, barium, boron, chromium, lead, vanadium and zinc. According to the City, there is no standard for these metals in the distribution system, only at the treatment plant, however boron and chromium are listed as EPA primary contaminants and have known health risks. Our initial request for testing occurred November 9th and we were told the city needed to review this with the Minnesota Department of Health. As you know from previous testing, our water is very different than what is tested at the treatment plant and to date this testing has not been done in the affected area. Since there can be health effects from ingesting high levels of these metals, we continue to request testing and ask for your assistance in getting the testing done. Finally, we are attempting to determine if the service lines in the Morningside neighborhood are copper or not, and if they need to be fixed along with the pipe relining. According to Roger Glanzer, the Utilities Superintendent, the lines � the main to the curb were changed to copper in the 1970s. We would like the City to be certain about the service content as we would like to avoid any possible delay in the pipe relining project. We would also like further information on how residents can determine if they need to replace the lines to their homes and how this should be done so that residents can have the opportunity to coordinate this with the relining process. 12/18/2007 Thank you again for your support. Julie Banker and Tara Bizily 12/18/2007 Deb Mangen 'rom: Jennifer Bennerotte ant: Monday, December 17, 2007 3:16 PM Cc: Deb Mangen Subject: FW: Cornelia Neighborhood Response to SAC proposals Attachments: SACresponse_12- 17- 07.pdf SACresponse_12 -1 7- 07.pdf (85 K... Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 jbennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us - - - -- Original Message---- - From: JOSH SPRAGUE [mailto:josh @joshsprague.com] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 3:12 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Cc: save70th; save70thboard Subject: Cornelia Neighborhood Response to SAC proposals dina council members and staff, ETC /SAC chairs and members, and honorable Senator Michel: Attached please find a PDF of our response to the 70th Street Study Advisory Committee's draft Segment Alternatives for Future 70th Street. You can also find this under "Key Documents for Review" at our website, http: / /save70th.org. Respectfully, JS josh sprague, chair greater w 70th st homeowners ass'n 4720 70th st w cell 612.501.0252 josh @joshsprague.com 1 Greater West 70th Street wo£c 44 Homeowner's Association 7 December 17, 2007 Study Advisory Commission (SAC) Members Edina Traffic Commission Members Edina City Council Members Mayor Jim Hovland Gordon Hughes, City Administrator Wayne Houle, Edina Engineering Department VIA EMAIL Dear Edina Traffic Planning Representatives and Staff. For the past year, the Greater West 70`h Street Homeowner's Association has worked to improve our neighborhood and for the future of Edina starting with the one mile of West 70th Street that currently splits us in half. In January, 2007, over 600 residents between 68`h and 72 "d St. and from Hwy. 100 to France, signed a petition in support of a "calmer, greener" W. 70th St. Since that time, the community consensus has grown even stronger. For over a year, our organization has endeavored to work with you in order to explain our vision to you and help you with its implementation. In the beginning, we were quite hopeful because the Comprehensive Plan Vision 20/20 statement specifically endorsed a "neighborhood first" concept for Edina. And the SAC was created to broaden citizen input. At times, even recently, we have felt some glimmers of hope; however overall we have become increasingly disappointed and frustrated by the reluctance and often refusal to productively listen, understand and cooperate with us and our vision. Our views DO represent our neighborhood consensus concerning W. 70th Street's future. This view may not be shared by some outside our area for whom W. 70th Street now serves as an east - west "expressway" at our expense. However, our views DO represent those citizens who are most affected by the proposed changes and DO represent a much larger proportion of Edina citizens than a single representative on SAC would indicate. Instead of listening and responding to us, you have chosen to hear primarily from other handpicked and compliant "representatives" and/or "experts" that appear to favor preconceived changes that would further divide and degrade our neighborhood. Initially, we were concerned that your actions indicated a covert agenda to turn W. 70th into an expressway because of simplistic and artificially derived traffic volume increase projections for the Southdale area that can handle traffic in no other way. Given recent SAC proposals, and their future traffic congestion ramifications, there is still such concern. We remain convinced that most Edina decision - makers dismiss the judgment and good sense of their own citizens and favor their preconceived growth and development concepts and plans at the expense of neighborhoods. Favoring such preconceived ideas is a paternalistic, anachronistic, and counter - productive approach to effective decision - making and results in bad outcomes for the very citizens for whom you ostensibly work. Fortunately, from our perspective, it is not yet too late for you to not only listen, but this time hear us. This is our neighborhood. And our neighborhood a large and vital part of the Edina community. Our perspective should be a very important one in your final decision, even if, to date, you have not really heard what we say. It is in Edina's greater interest for our families, homes, Arneson Acres Park, Cornelia School and Playground, and Christ Presbyterian Church to continue to flourish. With this in mind, here is our review of the Study Advisory Committee's Segment Concept Alternatives for Future West 70`h Street: Alternative #1 — "Arneson Parkway" with Roundabouts We support an "Arneson Parkway." But not the roundabout design offered by SRF. For three major reasons: 1. It slows east -west traffic yet is purports to accommodate significantly increased traffic flow by 2020. If this contradictory condition occurred, access from our cross streets onto 70th would be much more difficult than now due to lack of roundabout gaping and the median. Yet SRF told us a traffic flow modeling to assess such gaping and their assumed traffic diversion was such an "beyond the scope" of their limited analysis. 2. The design needlessly widens the existing 40 foot curb width of W. 70a' Street because of unnecessarily wide traffic lanes, the proposed continuous center median and possible parking cut -ins. Regardless of whether public or private right of way, staying within the existing curb width was initially and remains a MAJOR design goal of our association. Such expansion would negatively impact many of our members, increase the chance of future conversion to four lanes; and delay implementation of improvement due to its higher cost. 3. The median wastes roadway space and further divides the neighborhood, north and south. Our Parkway concept instead uses the 40 feet width as follows: 1. Narrow road lanes to slow traffic (10-11 feet wide — painted 10 either way) and elimination of turn lanes. Narrow lanes slow traffic. 2. Bi- directional bike lanes (4 -5 feet wide). 3. Parallel parking spaces on one side of the street (7 -8 feet wide), between the curb and bike lane. 4. A roadway centerline vibration strip from 1 -3 feet wide is acceptable if 10 foot lanes are used to separate the lanes. This would also limit bike and parking lane encroachment during delayed left turns. ' 5. Emergency vehicle width would be preserved through encroachment on the bike lane when needed. Major Intersections: We believe roundabouts at Cornelia and West Shore would pose a significant challenge for people trying to enter and exit their driveways at peak times and would create additional cut -thru traffic for the neighborhood. Therefore we believe an additional traffic light at West Shore Drive is a better option for the narrowed road. We also understand that with the bike lanes and on street parking, left turns would be difficult when traffic volume is high. Therefore the West Shore light and the light at Cornelia would need to include an extended left turn arrow and careful timing and synchronization. In addition, key features that your proposals left out of the our vision are: 1. Additional crosswalks fronting both parks and the school entry - not just at street intersections 2. Boulevard trees from France to 100 3. Quiet (rubberized) asphalt 4. Additional signage to direct traffic to appropriate routes such as 62, 494, 77`h/Industrial Blvd., and Valley View Road. Comments on the other SRF Road Alternatives: Alternatives #2 and #3 – 3 Lane or 2 Lane with Signals – both with wide lanes and not 40 feet wide if bike lanes are included. These proposals are status quo and therefore unacceptable to the neighborhood. They will not significantly slow traffic. The road has been a dangerous and loud commercial raceway for over 30 years. The reason the Cornelia constituency is involved is to restore residential integrity to the street in accordance with the first goal listed in the Vision 20/20 Statement. Alternative #4 – Combined Signal /Roundabout This solution seems the least well thought out of all the alternatives as a "hybrid" solution and fails to deliver a consistent solution for this corridor. What we really need a visionary plan that puts the neighborhood first. We want to remind you of what's at stake here —the safety of our children, and the future of a residential corridor that we have to live with, day in and day out, for the next 50 years. We still want to work with you and hope it is not too late. Our vision is relatively simple and less costly to implement and will slow traffic. We hope you will seize this opportunity to join with us in developing not just "a plan" for 19,300 cars per day in 2020, but the best plan for West 70th —one that encourages the use of surrounding major roads, instead of just ours, to ease Southdale access. Truly yours, J Josh Sprague, Chair Greater W 70'' St Homeowners Assn 4720 70th St W Tel 612.501.0252 Email ioshaa.ioshsnraeue.com Submitted on Behalf of the Board members of the Greater W.70t' Homeowners Association: Josh Sprague - Marge Andre - Kari Ciardelli - Joe Florenzano - Ruth Johnson Amy Kerber - Bill Neiman - Kris Norton - J.B. Overstreet - Ronald Rich - Colby Wilkins ra /S /o? z.. S App I 0 5�4 T Z. i LOUI3 COMORT MANY . CUL g* • '. �:, �, 1• �I��I, rF��l��l�l�l��l���ll��Il���ll�ll���ll� .����li��i�ll 4 r� I ' •a2 c�o,� :r •�•,.ow .•c� '�.a�. '�- �i�+.a�� � cam. chat wit a2 -c,�.� xrQ,Q... �.s,., �•,wR.o. R�ro¢. Rai,. er.....�Q. NsmzA ,1 lob-) - L(1 $$ November 14, 2007 Chief Mike Siitari 4801 West 50" Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Chief Siitari: I would like to inform you on what a tremendous assistance Joel' core was to me last Thursday November 8, 2007. Officer Moore assisted me in getting in touch with Hennepin Adult Protection Agency; I am a 61 old heart patient as well as a diabetic. I had an incident with depression with the loss of my father, as well a financial in which I needed medication. I am very grateful to him for helping me to get though my depression. I will be receiving help from a nurse with the Agency next week. Through, Officer Moore Mr. Jim Groff and Mr. John Paul provided me the funds to get my medication. I also received 3 bags of food on Saturday November 10, 2007 to assist me until next month. He is a tremendous asset to the Edina Police Department. Sincerely, t,�, �; `� 9 `• �1 r \'k& Dt— Michael J. Muhar 2008 Tentative City of Edina Meetings, Holidays, Pay Dates & Election Dates Holidays - City Council Std Ses Pln Com Zon Brd Trns Com Park Board Health Election Day HRRC E& E Com HP Brd Art Cnt Brd Pay Day JANUARY S M T W T F S JUNE 1 1 3 1 4 5 6 7 9 1 10 1 12 13 20 14 21 jr 23 24 18 19 25 26 27 28 29 31 19 20 APRIL S M T W T F S JUNE 1 3 2 3 4 5 6 7 r22 9 10 11 12 13 14 13 16 18 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 M 31 1 29 31 JULY S M T W T F S JUNE 1 3 2 3 4 5 6 7 r22 9 10 11 12 13 14 13 16 18 18 19 20 21 24 23 1 24 25 26 27 281 29 M 31 1 29 31 OCTOBER S M T W T F S JUNE 1 3 2 3 4 5 6 4: r22 9 10 11 12 13 11 13 17� 18 19 20 17 23 24 25 26 1 27 23 30 31 28 FEBRUARY S M T W T F S JUNE 1 3 3 1 1 2 3 4: 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 13 13 14 15 16 17 18 21 20 22 22 23 24 1 25 28 29 28 1 29 31 MAY S M T W T F S JUNE 1 3 3 1 2 3 4 4: 5 7 8 9 10 11 ]12 13 4 15 16 17 18 22 21 21 22 23 24 25 26 28 29 29 30 31 NOVEMBER S M T W T F S JUNE 1 3 3 S 1 1 2 4: 5 6 7 8 9 mm� 12 13 ®m 15 ®m 17 '8 mmm�® 22 21 22 23 24 29 22 27 28 29 30 28 29 30 NOVEMBER S M T W T F S JUNE 1 3 3 S 1 1 2 4: 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 '8 19 22 21 22 23 24 29 22 27 28 29 30 28 29 30 MARCH S M T W T F S JUNE 1 3 3 S 1 2 T 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6 12 13 14 15 16 17 - F21 22 23 30 2.4 31 27 28 29 SEPTEMBER S M T W T F S JUNE 1 3 3 S M T W T F S 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15 16 18' 25 20 21 22 23 30 26 27 28 29 30 SEPTEMBER S M T W T F S 1 3 3 4 5» 6 7 10 : 9 1 10 11 12 13 14 15 y 17 7R 19 20 21 22 ': 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 DECEMBER S M T W T F S 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 17 19 20 21 22 �4 25 26 27 28 29 1 ^1 File: Council Meeting Schedule 2008.x1s Printed: 12/11/2007 at 2:27 PM o .4 -��A, o/ $Mn; M �y Upcoming meetings: i • Zoning Board of Appeals & Adjustments, 5:30 p.m. Dec. 6 • Park Board, 7 p.m. Dec. 11 • Heritage Preservation Board, 7 p.m. Dec. 11 • Human Rights & Relations Commission, 7 p.m. Dec. 18 City Contacts City Manager Gordon Hughes 952 - 826 -0401 Assistant City Manager Heather Worthington 952 - 826 -0415 City Clerk Debra Mangen 952 - 826-0408 City Planner Cary Teague 952 - 826 -0460 City Engineer /Director of Public Works Wayne Houle 952 -826 -0443 We'd like to hear from you ... If you have any comments, call Communi- cations & Marketing Director Jennifer Bennerotte at 952- 833 -9520. The text of this publication will be available online at www.CityofEdina.com. I I E, PLEASE RECYCLE. Council Connection A summary of the Dec. 4 Edina City Council & HRA meeting Council holds TM hearing The Council held its truth -in- taxation (TNT) hearing at a special meeting Dec. 3. In September, the Council set the City's maximum tax levies for 2008. Hennepin County used the certification information to mail TNT notices to property owners. At the TNT hearing, the public is encouraged to comment on the proposed tax levy and the budget. No one provided testimony at the hearing. The levies are $20,314,404 for the General Fund, $1,040,186 for debt service of the Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HRA) Public Project Revenue Bonds Series 2002, $200,000 for debt service of the HRA Public Property Revenue Bond Series 2005A and using $185,784 for the surplus of the gymnasium construction bond proceeds and $455,641 for debt service of the Capital Improve- ment Plan Bond Series 2007A. The total market value -based referendum levy was set at $595,438. Total of the five levies would in- crease by $1,075,141, or 4.99 percent from 2007. The prelimi- nary General Fund expenditure budget is $28,654,642. The Council will act on the budget at its Dec. 18 meeting. Council approves Country Club street reconstruction Although sympathetic.to property owners who will pay high assess- ments, the Council approved sewer, water and street improve- ments in the historic Country Club District. The project includes reconstruc- tion of the water main system, repair and upgrade of the sanitary sewer system, upgrade of the storm sewer system, replacement of the street lighting system and reconstruction of the roadway. All components of the 2006 North- east Edina Transportation Study, as they relate to the Country Club District, are included in the plan. Because of the size of the project, the City plans to complete the project over the course of two years. The northern portion of the District would be reconstructed in 2008 and the southern portion in 2009. The estimated project cost is $19.6 million. Special assess- ments per household will be ap- proximately $18,210 to $22,900. Plans and specifications will be completed and bids solicited in the spring of 2008. Council OKs building height change, decides against moratorium Responding to residents con- cerned with "massing," the Coun- cil approved an ordinance amend- ment regarding building height for single - family homes. Under the zoning ordinance amendment, the definition of "building height" will be changed to measure height from the exist- ing ground elevation, rather than the proposed ground elevation. This change will limit the ability to "build up" a lot with earth before construction. The revised ordinance will limit all construction, whether it is a tear - down /rebuild or an addition to a home increasing the first -floor elevation, to a height of no more than one foot above the existing first -floor elevation. Concerned that the ordinance amendment will not go far enough to curb massing in the community, the Council discussed establishing a moratorium on demolition of new single - family homes while the zoning ordinance could be further studied. However, after hearing from residents, builders and real estate agents, the Council opted against such action. Instead, the Council directed staff to further research the possibili- ties of establishing a floor area ratio and limitations on hard sur- face coverage. Staff will work to complete modeling and other research in the first quarter of the year. Council approves school's revised landscape plan The Council approved Calvin Christian School's revised land- scape plan for its expansion. Officials of Calvin Christian School recently removed a number of trees from their property at 4015 Inglewood Ave., in preparation for a building addition there. How- ever, the removal of the trees constituted a violation of the ap- proved Conditional Use Permit for the project, as the trees were to be relocated on the site. To remedy the violation, a revised landscape plan was submitted for the Council to consider in Novem- ber. Council members found the plan to be in flux and directed church officials to finalize the plans and meet with neighbors. Since the November meeting, the school finalized its plans and met with the neighbors of the church. Changes or additions to the plan include installing two eight -foot, three - stemmed River Birch trees in the rain garden north of the west building; one eight -foot, three - stemmed River Birch in the rain garden east of the west build- ing; and four Maples north of the drop -off area. Revisions also in- clude replacing all Sumac and Green Spruce with Japanese Yews and shrub roses in the bus circle area; four Poplar trees with Swamp Oak in the bus circle; and five Linden trees with Maple trees north of the bus circle. Deb Mangen From: Jennifer Bennerotte r. '+t: Thursday, December 06, 2007 11:05 AM Deb Mangen Subject: FW: joni bennett Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 jennerotte@ci.edina.mn.us From: Joe Noonan (mailto:jnoonan @tmcmanagementcorp.com] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 10:30 AM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: re:joni bennett Greetings: C ne of the others please tell the above council member to stop embarassing the community? Her quote — "builders and realtors ... are the problem ". She owes an apology to every one of them who actually possess credentials, expertise, and real world experience) on the issue. It seems obvious that it is the ignorant amateur want -to -be central planning types who are too full of themselves( sound familiar Joni)to respect the marketplace forces (and the constituents who now regrettably supported her) that present the greatest threat to our property rights and freedom. She is radioactive to homeowner's property values in Edina. Be sure to tell her to continue her outspoken crusade and opposition during her re- election campaign so the voters can reinforce what she still refuses to believe. We will all happily contribute towards a one -way plane fare so she can personally discuss her goals more fully with Castro,Chavez, or Putin with whom she has more in common. She is the new poster child for why McMansions are needed more than ever - -- to keep persons like herself from getting in and contaminating the well. GOOD LUCK!! SEAS 12/6/2007 December 6, 2007 Mark Linehan 10511 Grant Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55347 Dear Mr. Linehan: City of Edina On behalf of Mayor of Edina Jim Hovland, I wish to thank you for your letter addressed to Mayor Hovland regarding your concerns about the Edina Basketball Association. The City of Edina supports all of Edina's 14 independently incorporated youth athletic associations and in fact the City has recently redefined its relationship with these associations through the 2006 year -long efforts of the Edina Youth Sports Taskforce. The Taskforce proposed a relationship document and a core values document that were both endorsed by the Edina Park Board and approved by the Edina City Council. The relationship document states that the City demands certain guidelines be followed by each youth athletic association, including a mandatory grievance process that must be followed. This four step grievance process begins with the association's board of directors. If the grievance cannot be resolved at that level or by Park & Recreation Department staff, then an Ad -Hoc Grievance Committee will be formed to deal with the issue(s). If not resolved at that level, the matter is then brought to the Park Board for a final decision. I encourage you to follow the process in place, which in. this case is to work directly with the Edina Basketball Association (EBA) and their Board of Directors. The EBA runs an outstanding program and I'm confident they will work with you in a reasonable manner to address your concerns. Feel free to contact me with any questions at 952- 826 -0430 or Jkgprios@,ci.edina.mn.us. S' WEdina , ' s, D' irector r and Recreation Department Cc: Jim Hovland, Mayor of Edina Gordon Hughes, City Manager Pat Kline, EBA Director of Traveling Basketball Ed MacHolda, Assistant Director Edina Park & Rec. Dept City Hall 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 Park and Recreation Department www.cityofedina.com 952 - 826 -0367 FAX 952 - 826 -0385 TTY 952 - 826 -0379 Deb Mangen From: Jennifer Bennerotte "-nt: Friday, December 07, 2007 8:09 AM Deb Mangen Subject: FW: Moratorium on Monster Houses Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 jennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us From: Bob Thompson [mailto:rthompson123 @gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 9:21 AM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Moratorium on Monster Houses Hello City Council Members Thanks for staying on top of this issue. I would favor a moratorium just to get the attention of those who lack respect and sensitivity for their neighbors and neighborhoods. But I do understand the resistance to interference in the give and take of the market. I ; move ahead and get zoning standards in place to preserve the quality of neighborhoods and the right of ne.r,nbors to not be overwhelmed with the intrusion of monster houses shoehorned onto inadequate lots. I don't oppose redevelopment of a property when the existing house is well past its useful life and cost of remodeling exceeds replacement. But the economics of speculative redevelopment make this process an absurdity. The land value argument is only valid because monster houses are permitted to go into neighborhoods where they destroy the character of the street and the right of existing property owners to enjoy the daylight, privacy, separation and views they originally bought as part of their property. Robert Thompson 4523 Bruce Ave. S. Edina, MN 55424 12/10/2007 .wammv'o .Subo inb Z-Ams8 Now at Two Locations 7031 Cahill Road Edina,MN 55439 6407 City West Pkwy Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone 952 -516 -7800 Fax 952 -516 -7801 Phone 952- 903 -5305 Fax 952- 903 -5306 Mr. James Hovland Edina City Hall As a new business owner in Edina I was approached by an individual with a request to build a new skating rink building. When I gave my approval I was under the impression that it was a warming house with a non profit concession stand, run by volunteers. If it is to be a coffee shop run for profit I am adamantly opposed to it. That would be in direct completion with the Sub shop that I have just started. I have been involved in the food industry for the past 30 years, and have run my own business for the last 5 years. I have many concerns with the information I have received so far. Any information you could afford me before the January 8' meeting would be appreciated. Thank you, dE�t' r / J ZOO % Editor Edina Sun Current 10917 Valley View Road Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 Dear sir, We are very concerned about a commercial proposal to build warming house at Lewis Park. It'would be a two story building serving food and coffee. We lived in Edina for 31 years , left for 14 years and now reside at the Dewey Hill West Condo. HOCKY IN Edin&L is N66. bnd we must do nothing to alter the rink at Lewis Park. I coached hockey at the Pee Wee and Bantgm levels. We had teams with poor won and loss records and one team that sent some players to Division I Oollege hockey. In addition to the hockey rink, and maybe even more important!@ - is the Lewis Park and its beautiful green space. We had a relative from Florida and a long tim* friend from Wisconsin walk completely around the park and its beautiful green space. THey were astounded at the amount Of.green space and how well it was manicured. If the warming house needs improvements or repaLacement� we would be 100% behind a project to do so but not ag a commercial investment, The proposal to enlarge, serve some food and maybe reduce some space for the ice rink and green space with a private investure is very definately NOT the way to go. We hope the Park Board, Finance Manager, @ City Counci =embers and Mayor turn down the private investment to make any major changes in the hockey rink or the precious GREEN SPACE. Sincerely, Mavis and Rix de Lambert 7Ae-� e& Z411"A"l- 5601 Dewey Hill Road ( #302) Edina, Minnesota 55439 (952 941 6553) New. Programming — Comcast is your HD Headquarters! We are pleased to announce the launch of more High - Definition services in December and January: Animal Planet HD, CNN HD, Discovery HD, Food HD, FSN -North HD, History HD, Sci -Fi HD, TBS HD, TLC HD, Universal HD, and USA HD. With HD on Demand, Comcast offers more HD choices than satellite! An HD television and HD receiver are required to view HD programming. Basic service is required to receive HD broadcast channels; Digital Starter is required to receive most cable - network HD services. HBO HD, Showtime HD and other premium HD services are available with premium subscription. Free Holiday Concert Series Returns — Comcast is partnering with The Saint Paul Chamber Orchestra to present the following free community holiday concerts: Dec. 18 at Metro State University (celebrating Hmong culture and arts), St. Paul, 7 pm; Dec. 19 at Blaine High School, 7 pm; Dec. 20 at Lord of Life Church, Maple Grove, 7 pm; Dec. 21 at King of Kings Church, Woodbury, 7 pm; and by invitation to armed services personnel, family and friends on Dec. 22 at Immanuel Lutheran Church, Eden Prairie, 2 pm. The orchestra presents these concerts to give back to the community, and we are pleased to offer our support. Several concerts are already full. Contact Kelly Weber at 651 -493 -5318 for free tickets and more information. Keystone Recognition — On Dec. 12, Comcast will receive its 8m consecutive Keystone Award in a ceremony hosted by the Minneapolis Regional Chamber. The Keystone Award recognizes outstanding community giving and is presented each year to businesses that contribute over two percent of pre -tax earnings to community needs. Toys for Tots — Comcast and the Minnesota Wild are teaming up to promote Toys for Tots throughout Dec. TV )ts encourage residents to drop off toys at our payment centers. Employees are contributing to Toys for Teens. Recognize an Innovative Educator — Applications are being accepted for individuals who implement creative learning programs and push education progress to new heights. Comcast is looking for local leaders who are transforming learning in our service area. Visit www.LeadersinLearningAwards.org to nominate someone for the 2008 Cable's Leaders in Learning Awards, presented by Cable in the Classroom, cable's education foundation. Midwest Division Champs — The Twin Cities Region is proud to announce that we are tops in employee participation in Comcast's Midwest Division 2007 United Way Campaign with 70% of our employees contributing, and we took first place in the annual CommTech Jeopardy (technical skills and knowledge) competition. Kudos to the team! Did you know that our employees will receive over 100,000 hours of training this year? Comcast and Microsoft Launch Microsoft Communication Services for Business — This new product, which is included with Comcast Business Class Internet access, allows customers to share business messages, calendars, contact lists and documents anywhere there is Internet access. These features are fully integrated with Comcast's business products and locally supported 24/7, so small business customers can get the benefits of Microsoft products without having to manage their IT needs on their own. Comcast Training Center Planned — Watch for more about a regional technical training center to open at 801 Plymouth Ave. N. in North Minneapolis. The former Time Warner Cable HQ is undergoing a significant renovation. Comcast Newsmakers — Appearing with host Colleen Needles in Dec. are Frank Forsberg, Greater Twin Cities United Way; John Tschida, Courage Center; Richard Hitchler, SteppingStone Theatre; Tammy Guillard, Minnesota Computers for Schools; Constance Mosher, Wells Fargo "WnterFun "; Tom Hoch with Lauren Bartelt, Hennepin Theatre Trust "Spotlight "; Jana Vaughn, Airport Foundation MSP; and U.S. Congresswoman Michele ;hmann. Newsmakers interviews may be seen throughout the day at :24 and :54 past the hour on CNN Headline . MS. Feel free to contact us at any time. We look forward to staying in touch. Thank youl Lance Leupold — 952 - 607 -4203; Arlen Mattem — 952 - 607 -4220 ©BUILDERS % ASSOCIATION OF THE TWIN CITIES PROFESS109AL ROME BUILDERS S REMODELERS December 4, 2007 Mayor James Hovland City of Edina 4801 W 50th St. Edina, MN 55424 -1330 Dear Mayor Hovland: My name is Tom Bakritges, the Local Governmental Affairs Director for the Builders Association of the Twin Cities (BATC). BATC is one of the top residential builder organizations in the country, with nearly 2,000 member firms. Within those firms, this equates to approximately 45,000 business owners and employees in our area. Our goal is to make sure that housing issues are discussed with reasonable ends in mind for our members as builders, but for the communities as well. I am responsible for coordinating government affairs within communities that fall within the eleven- county BATC jurisdiction. My primary role is to develop a consistent and cohesive relationship with cities and counties in working as partners in directing and managing housing issues. My professional background includes working for a city and as a private developer. It is my hope that, with experience from both perspectives, I will be able to act as a liaison between our two organizations. I began my career with the city of Brooklyn Park, working my way up over the course of thirteen years from Planning Aide to _Development Coordinator. As Development Coordinator for the city, I coordinated all aspects of the site review process and served as a liaison between the city and developers. In addition, I coordinated both residential construction and commercial/industrial proposals to develop major sections of the Brooklyn Park, as the city received an influx of nearly ten - thousand new residents during my tenure. After working for a city for 13 years, my career path brought me into private land development. In 2001, 1 moved to the private sector after accepting a position as Land Development Project Manager for D.R. Horton, Inc. — Minnesota. At D.R. Horton, I oversaw mainly residential land development projects from acquisition to delivery of lots. Next; in 2004, 1 moved to Centex Homes — Minnesota to serve, in the position of Area Land Acquisition Manager, in which my duties included acquiring land and entitlements for the Minnesota division's residential construction projects. My experience at both companies included multifamily and single - family developments all over the Twin Cities metro region. As housing issues are important to the City of Edina we would like to work with you as partners in resolving housing and growth issues. In addition, we would like you to see BATC as a resource for housing issues that you may face, and the challenges we must all face together. I look forward'to.this opportunity. to work cooperatively toward a more efficient and ;effective development review and residential construction process. Parade of Homec- www.paradeofhonles.org 2960 Centre Pointe Drive •Roseville, Minnesota 55113-1182 • 651-697-1954 •Fax 651-697-7599 •Parade Fax 651-697-7575 If you have any questions, you can reach me at 651- 697 -7580 or via email tom(@batc.org. Please feel free to contact me any time and I look forward to working with you! December 6, 2007 Mr. Gordon L. Hughes Executive Director Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Edina HRA, Minnesota Revenue Note (Volunteers of American in Minnesota Project) $2,500,000 Dear Mr. Hughes: State File M -4426 The Department of Employment and Economic Development has examined the application and exhibits submitted by you relating to the proposal to offer revenue bonds as authorized by the Municipal Industrial Development Act, Minn. Stats. Sections 469.152 through 469.1651. Based upon the information you submitted, approval of the project is hereby granted by the Department of Employment and Economic Development. Such approval shall not be deemed to be an approval by the Department or the State of Minnesota regarding the feasibility of the project or the terms of the revenue agreement to be executed or the bonds to be issued therefor, nor whether the project falls within regulations of Federal Law. This approval does not in any way constitute an approval of an allocation in excess of an entitlement award pursuant to Minn. Stats. Section 474A. Accordingly, it may be necessary for the issuer to seek an allocation under Minn. Stats. Section 474A. Business and Community Development Division 1 st National Bank Building ■ 332 Minnesota Street, Suite E200 ■ Saint Paul, MN 55101 -1351 USA ■ www.positivelyminnesota.com Toll Free: 800 - 657 -3858 ■ Phone: 651 - 259 -7114 ■ Fax: 651 - 296 -5287 ■ TTY/TDD: 651 - 282 -5909 Mr. Hughes December 6, 2007 Page 2 The bond counsel is in receipt of this letter and application, as well as a Project Closing /Notice of Issue report, which must be completed by the bond counsel and returned to this Department within five (5) days after the obligations are issued. Please refer to the "M" State File number when submitting the Project Closing /Notices of Issue report. Failure to file this report within the five -day period will void the obligations if the obligations are subject to a federal limitation act. Your cooperation in the timely submission of these reports will be sincerely appreciated. If you have any questions about your project approval, or the reports, please call Joyce Pellow at 651- 259 -7444. Sincerely, Mark Lofthus Business and Community Development Director Enclosures cc: James B. Hovland, Edina HRA Catherine M. Nutzmann, Dorsey & Whitney M -4426 Edina HRA (Volunteers of America in Minnesota Project) 12- 6- 07.doc Revised August 2003 STATE OF NNNESOTA MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BUSINESS AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BOND PROJECT PURSUANT TO MINNESOTA STATUTES, SECTION 469.152 THROUGH 469.165 (Please submit this form in duplicate - all supporting data in single copy only) Date: December 5, 2007 The governing body of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority Minnesota, hereby applies to the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (Department) for approval of a proposed Industrial Development Bond issue as required by Mum. Stat. § 469.152 - 469.165. Address of issuer: 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, Minnesota 424, Attn: Gordon L Hughes Executive Director, Telephone: (952) 826 -0401 Fax: (952) 826 -0390 We have entered into preliminary discussions with: Firm: Volunteers of America in Minnesota Attorney: Mr. Mark Larson, Messerli & Kramer P.A. Address: 5905 Golden Valley Road, Suite 110 Address: 1800 Fifth Street Towers, 150 South 5h Str. City: Golden Valley State: MN Zip 55422 City: Minneapolis State: MN Zip 55402 Name of Project: Revenue Note (Volunteers of America in Minnesota Project) - This firm is engaged primarily in (nature of business): Comprehensive social services agency providing affordable housing and human services to low- income families children and seniors The proceeds from the sale of the Industrial Development Bonds will be used to (describe the project): Acquisition of an existing building and site for use as the Corporation's headquarters and administrative offices, together with any related construction or reconstruction costs and acquisition and installation of necessary equipment and furnishings. Address of Project: 7625 Metro Boulevard, Edina, Minnesota Acquisition of land and building: New construction: Demolition and site preparation: Acquisition and Installation of Equipment: Fees: Architectural, engineering, inspection, fiscal, legal, administration, or printing: Construction Interest: Initial Bond Reserve: Contingencies: Other: Total: $2,700,000.00 75,000.00 0 28,000.00 50,000.00 0 0 10,000,000 $2,863,000.00 Construction will begin on or about December 15, 2007, and will be complete on or about January 15, 2008. When completed, there will be approximately -0- new jobs created by the project at an annual payroll of approximately $ N/A , based upon currently prevailing wages. (If applicable) There are 120 - existing jobs provided by business. (If applicable) There will be N/A jobs created by construction of the project. Number of hours N/A Average wage level N/A 1 Repayment of the proposed issue will be amortized over a period of 25 years. The following exhibits are furnished with this application and are incorporated herein by reference: An opinion of bond counsel that the proposal constitutes a project under Minn. Stat. § 469.153, subd. 2. 2. A copy of the resolution by the governing body of the issuer giving preliminary approval for the issuance of its revenue bonds and stating that the project, except for a project under Minn. Stat. § 469.153, subd. 2(g) or 0) would not be undertaken but for the availability of Industrial Development Bond financing. A comprehensive statement by the municipality indicating how the project satisfies the public or purpose and policies of Minn. Stat.§ 469.152 - 469.165. 4. A letter of intent to purchase the bond issue or a letter confirming the feasibility of the project from a financial standpoint. A statement signed by the principal representative of the issuing authority to the effect that upon entering into the revenue agreement, the information required by Minn. Stat. § 469.154, subd. 5 will be submitted to the Department (not applicable to projects under Minn. Stat. § 469.153, subd. 2(g) or 0). 6. A statement signed by the principal representative of the issuing authority that the project does not include any property to be sold or affixed to or consumed in the production of property for sale, and does not include any housing facility to be rented or used as a permanent residence. 7. A statement signed by a representative of the issuing authority that a public hearing was conducted pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 469.154, subd. 4. The statement shall include the date, time and place of the meeting and certify that a draft copy of this application with all attachments was available for public inspection and that al interested parties were afforded an opportunity to express their views. 8. Copies of notice(s) as published which indicate the date(s) of publication and the newspaper(s) in which the notice(s) were published. 9. Provide a plan for compliance of employment preference of economically disadvantaged or unemployed individuals. (See Minn. Stat. § 469.154, subd. 7.) We, the.undersigned, are duly elected representatives of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority, Minnesota and solicit your approval of this project at your earliest convenience so that we may carry it to a final conclusion. Bondapplication080503.wpd -2- Signed by: (Principal Officers or Representatives of Issuing Authority; type or print official's name on the line to the left of the signature line. Thank you.) Gordon L. Hughes Title: Executive Director Title: Edina HRA Chair This approval shall not deemed to be an approval by the Department of the State of the feasibility of the project or the terms of the revenue agreement to be executed or the bonds to be issued therefor. - Authorized Signature, Minnesota Department of 12—b 1 d Employment and Economic Development Date of Approval Please return to: Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development Paul A. Moe, Director Office of Business Finance 500 Metro Square Building 121 Seventh Place East St. Paul, Minnesota 55101 -2146 Phone: 651-297-1391 Fax: 651-296-5287 Bondapplication080503.wpd -3- 4833-9583-1810\1 I Lewis Park Neighborhood Association, To: the Mayor of Edina, City council, City Manager, Finance Manager, and Park Board: e as President of the Lewis Park Neighborhood h oodciation. My name is Casandra Mihalchick and I sery house at of townhome associations and condominium eaod associations, warming • h a We are a consortium opposed to the prop side with coffee, drinks, snacks or food d areplacement or businesses and individual it W1 h la structure are serving house may Lewis Park and to replace house is large enough to smaller warming house. We do acknowledge that then warming warming sma space" where any meetings or renovation. We do not believe that the current °and a "gathering P rink, or house, Zamboni garage reen space, the ice skating accommodate a warming could take place without the loss of g gatherings beyond a few people the hockey rink which we oppose to be a donation opposed to a proles that on first blush appears public land, regardless This Association has good reason to be opp We do not believe We oppose any private investment or interest on p ' to the City. gift, or donation of a building. potential loss of a "free building' aback clause, uk cl park land. We are concerned about the the of its characterization as a loan with a payback involved in indirectly assisting (. Y it serves the community to commercialize P should be of any green space. We do not believe the city etes with the loyal, established, - n with temporary grant of the use of p ublic land) a business that comp blending cn and Cahill. We are, concerned about the us en of the building paying businesses at 70 - a unobt the high density residences of the neighborhood and being proposal presented to the Park There are troubleso me issues that are not immediately apparent in the prop Board that we believe are causes of concern. or "596 loan" and what are the conditions? ough,temporatrY) 1, What exactly is this "gift of a building" constituting the taking (even investment in a building on public land, thereby Would the of public property? Would the donor retain any rights until the investment, dterms? n or a return What are the proposed forfeiture, or performance on investment was recouped? rformance bond, give bank references, to assure p 100% of Would they guarantee covering private individuals post a p are spent. uarantee a net time and resources of the City mental costs to the City, and g before any the construction costs, reimburse develop spot would be sufficient to 15 ears so the City /taxpayers do not have to subsidize the project? operating profit for Y house/gathering P overhead, osed coffee house /g support the payment of full time staff, he . 2 We do not believe the size of the prop e ent:to.supp and ultimately en to the allow it to ever be financially his w The location is not s .maintenance, etc. This would become thb is business. vent e'• he supplies, ers would have to pay for the running of taxpayer coffee shop and we feel it would detract from the character owned coffee appropriate for another co from the privately Lewis Park. Just as importantly, it would take business away shops and restaurants at 7& and Cahill that have worked hard to establish themselves 3. There are already sufficient gathering spots and coffee shops around our City, both commercial stores, such as Caribou Coffee and Starbucks; and public facilities in the schools, libraries, community center, Senior Center, etc. 4. We are not opposed to the renovation or replacement of the warming house, and do not resist change or improvement in our neighborhood or Park. To state such is a mischaracterization of our concern. S. We do support the keeping of public land separate from "private investment," even in the form of a "donation of a building" if any conditions are attached such as the recouping of construction costs, a built in return on investment or control over the design are imposed. Sincerely, & z'6�� Casandra Mihalchick, President of Lewis Park Neighborhood Association Lelalulit0gol.com. 952 - 929 -2900, cell 612 - 791 -4899, 7227 Lewis Ridge Parkway, Edina, MN. 55439 LEWIS PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION Who we are: A consortium of townhome and condominium associations' to the organizations, neighborhood businesses, use at Lewis Park and replace it with a proposal to tear down the warming ho house. structure that has a coffee shop that serves food and a smaller warming What our philosophy is We believe that the preservation and integrity of Edina neighborhood parks should be maintained and kept in the public sphere and kept from private investment, ownership, or influence. Some of the reasons we are opposed to the "A Better Lewis Park" Proposal a. We do not believe theeven for a brief time period, me taking Ps property, tors serves the community. by P the proposed new b. We do not believe there is adequate space to supp ort P P s building and that the loss of any more gr een P ace would not be in the best interest of the community. c. We do not believe that the proposal for the coffee shop /community center is financially viable and that the City will end up having to support it because it would not be self - sustaining. d. We believe that local businesses would be detrimentally affected by competition from the venture. Please write, call or email the Edina City Mayor, all City Council Members, City Manager, and the Park Board to express your opposition. If you would like more information, or want to assist us in our cause, please call Casandra Mihalchick, Head of the Association, at 952 - 929 -2900, cell 612 - 791 -4899, or email her at - e1alulit Deb Mangen From: Jennifer Bennerotte it: Monday, December 10, 2007 9:47 AM _. Deb Mangen Subject: FW: Mayor Hovland's request on teardown strategy Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 jennerotte@ci.edina.mn.us From: Lance Neckar [mailto:necka001 @umn.edu] Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 9:31 AM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Mayor Hovland's request on teardown strategy Dear Mayor Hovland, SEAL / viED .s one of the people you met at the CELA/ACSA conference event at which Will Steger spoke. You asked then if I had any ideas about the teardown -to- supersize cycle in Edina. I didn't then but did recently have one. Perhaps it is a question from the public side of preserving the values embedded in the street -side scale of traditional neighborhoods while allowing some flexibility at the rear of houses for larger square footages (to link the private motivation, with economics of housing renewal, tax base preservation). To foster public policy and private responses in kind, then, one of the solutions that might be considered is to have a zoning overlay in districts where smaller houses present a nearly uniform facade to the street. Combined with height controls (probably already in the code for these areas), and possible variances for rear lot setback requirements, this idea might fly politically as a compromise. The point would be either to design new replacement houses of greater square footage, but with street facade elements (windows, porch elements especially) at the same scale as the existing houses; or to encourage additions to existing houses; this latter situation might be encouraged if the city gave bonus points (greater sq. footage) for various energy or water conserving investments in the project. You would want a set of guidelines, a book or online resource, to help homeowners, builders, architects, and your building inspector. I ran this last part of the idea past Tim Fuller of SALA architects, who has done exactly this kind of residential design work. -- see his page at http: / /www.salaarc.com/, - -he suggested that this might be a project to pursue with the AIA Mn residential committee. They might advise a study preparatory to creating the guidelines. If this seems like a way to go, Tim suggested two paths: you could call him at SALA and talk the issue and ideas over, 612- 379 -3037, or go to the AIA website http: / /www.aia- nm.org /committees /residential_arch.cfm to contact the chair, Mark Larsen. One other thought: go to http: / /www.charrettecenter. net /charrettecenter .asp ?a= spf &pfk =7& k—�166 and particularly look at Johnson and Gerloffrs plan book for Longfellow as a model of what might be done. Lance Neckar Lance M. Neckar 12/10/2007 Interim Director, Metropolitan Design Center Dayton Hudson Land Grant Chair, Urban Design Professor, Landscape Architecture Fellow, Institute on the Environment 1 Rapson Hall 89 Church Street SE Minneapolis, MN 55455 612 625 6596 12/10/2007 r•�IV il Cr'r L There's Always Room for Improvement! - - . : Eleven years ago I caught my first glimpse of the obsessive mania displayed by people eager to own a piece of Oaklawn or Brookview Avenue in Edina. I'd overheard an Edina woman at a local park say there was only one street in town she could live on and be happy. Intrigued, I decided to go to an open house in that neighborhood to see what kind of a street could foster such a narrow view of happiness. I was almost trampled by stampeding buyers literally running up the driveway as they frantically tried to reach their agents on their cell phones! I see this trend has only worsened. Sadly, the almost comic behavior of today's buyers reminds me of Arnold Schwarzenegger's character in the movie, "Jingle All the Way." Arnold plays the role of a wealthy, fixated shopper who becomes temporarily insane when he loses perspective and confuses "want" with "need ". He is willing to step on anyone who gets in his way while he runs from store to store in his obsessive attempt to acquire one of the last remaining of a highly desirable Christmas toy in short supply. How ironic the director of this movie chose a charming Edina neighborhood to be the location of this character's home! It's an easy parallel to see; the houses on Oaklawn, Brookview and other streets are the popular toys in short supply while the sellers, developers and buyers have become the greedy Arnold Schwarzeneggers. In this unfortunate situation, the desire for money, prestige and individual want ( "dream" homes) has caused neighbor to forsake neighbor, and city to forsake neighborhoods. The new buyers who've squeezed big houses onto small lots have managed to destroy whatever charm this neighborhood used to have. When squeezed into small lots, these otherwise nice looking homes look like Alice in .Wonderland's oversized limbs bulging out the doors and windows'of a dollhouse. Charm is usually associated with quaint (small), not big. It's also associated with considerate words and actions that make others feel good. In their current setting these larger homes are not charming at all. They do not take into consideration the other homes on the block nor do they make their neighbors feel good. This development conflict also reminds me of the movie "You've Got Mail." The plot depicts the pros and cons of progress when a large chain business,, "Fox Bookstores," lures customers away from a small, personalized bookstore called, "The Shop Around the Corner." Though we've adapted to large -scale businesses replacing smaller stores, the larger company's takeover philosophy of "it's business, not personal" wasn't supposed to infiltrate our homes. Our homes and neighborhoods were supposed to remain the places we could retire to at the end of a long day of competing in the "me first" grind of capitalism. The integrity of our neighborhoods translates into the integrity of our city. And vice - versa. Do we want to encourage the "me first" philosophy of big business to filter into our neighborhoods, or do we want the "caring about others'_' philosophy of neighborhoods to filter out to the world? I'm afraid we'll never be able to recapture the lost charm of that smaller lot neighborhood. One resident recently told the Star Tribune that a professor is using Brookview as an example of over development. It's easy to see why. The neighborhood is too far gone to rescue. Like some parents who can't say "no" to their children, we've been negligent by allowing buyers who want it all, to squeeze their dream homes onto incompatible dream streets. We should have put a stop to over-development after the �" T P P P P ,,O �� first oversized house went up. The least we can do now is learn from mistakes and expeditious steps to prevent the spread of this disproportionate building. Why? Beca se Lh 1 ' the effects of this trend run much deeper than surface aesthetics, blocked sunlight and F- drainage issues. The perspective is wrong on the inside as well as the outside of these BY homes because many aspects of charm come from people's behavior. An attractive, healthy community depends on much more than looks! We should not promote ordinances that will attract the self - serving. We should enact ordinances that will guide people to be considerate of each other. A real and better alternative to what's happened on Oaklawn and Brookview is the example of my own neighbors. They bought a rambler on a hill and chose to limit the scope of their re- construction, creating a charming home that has its own identity yet fits in unobtrusively with the rest of the neighborhood. As you might guess, this family also compliments the neighborhood and community by assisting those in need, volunteering in the public schools, befriending and helping elderly neighbors, and fostering wonderful friendships. These are the kind of people I'd like to attract to our neighborhoods. To the resident who spoke at a city council meeting in favor of oversized home developments saying, "Guess what? We have doctors and lawyers on the block now. I love it!" I would like to say, "Guess what? The neighbor I described who chose to design his home in proper scale with the rest of the block is a doctor too!" In Edina, the message to both businesses and homebuyers seems to be, "you can have anything you want as long as you can afford it." The big problem is, you can't buy integrity, empathy, kindness, or even, sorry to say, charm. Homes around the world range from cardboard boxes in alleyways to royal palaces. Super Structures, McMansions and wealth are relative terms. Integrity, empathy and kindness are not. We either have these qualities or we don't. Prestige, money and dream homes should never trump "nice ". Not in any card game I'd want to play. The movies "Jingle All the Way" and "You've Got Mail" both have happy endings. That's because a poor kid ends up getting the highly sought after toy and the large business owner marries the small shop owner he forced out of business so she gets to work and live with him. Since these warm, fuzzy endings seem to happen mostly in the movies, we need to enact ordinances that will encourage people to behave considerately and permit the survival of neighborhoods where the non - wealthy can live. As my neighbor demonstrated, there's plenty of room for home improvement without over doing it! (By the way, I'd like to appeal to the developers who want to build new office buildings to the south of my home to please shorten them by half. Their proposed 10 to 14 stories will block our daytime access to the sun and sky as well as emit lighting that will pollute our view of a peaceful night. Thank you for listening.) Sincerely, Marie Sullivan Deb Mangen From: Jennifer Bennerotte 1: Thursday, December 06, 2007 11:18 AM Iu: John Keprios; Gordon Hughes; Cary Teague; John Wallin Cc: Deb Mangen Subject: FW: Letter from Neighborhood Association Attachments: finaldraftofmayodetter.doc; LEWIS PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION send.doc Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 jennerotte@ci.edina.mn.us From: Lelalulit @aol.com [mailto:Lelalulit @aol.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 7:07 PM To: John Keprios; Janet Canton; Andrew.Finsness @radisson.com; Damma001 @tc.umn.edu; tfronek @wck.com; gklus @trinityms.com; RandyAMeyer @aol.com; hmmerriam @earthlink.net; Ipesthus @comcast.net; jsitek @mn.rr.com; �m @mn.mcom; berrybliss491 @yahoo.com; John Wallin; Cary Teague; Gordon Hughes; Jim Hovland; iett@ci.edina.mn.us; shough @ci.edina.mn.us; Imascia @ci.edina.mn.us; aswenson @ci.edina.mn.us; Jennifer Bennerotte �... Lelalulit @aol.com Subject: Letter from Neighborhood Association I am not sure what the best source of distribution is for our Association. Would you please deliver the attached letter and attached mission statement to Ray O'Connell or any other member of the Park Board that does not receive this email, or whose addresses I have incorrect including all members of the Park Board, the Mayor, the City Council members, the City Manager, the Finance Director, City Planner, and anyone else that may potentially be involved in consideration of the proposal to tear down the Lewis Park warming house and replace it with a coffee shop /gathering spot/warming house? If this is not convenient, or is not the preferred method of communication, please notify me and I will send a hard copy. When I called City Hall for instructions on communication I was unclear about the preferred method. Thank you, Casandra Mihalchick, President of Lewis Park Neighborhood Association 612 - 791 -4899, 952 - 929 -2900, Lelalulit -aol.com Casandra Mihalchick 7227 Lewis Ridge Parkway Edina, Mn. 55439 12/5/07 Check out AOL Money & Finance's list of the hottest products and top money wasters of 2007 12/6/2007 Lewis Park Neighborhood Association, To: the Mayor of Edina, City Council, City Manager, Finance Manager, and Park Board: My name is Casandra Mihalchick and I serve as President of the Lewis Park Neighborhood Association. We are a consortium of townhome associations and condominium associations, neighborhood businesses and individuals. We all are opposed to the proposal to tear down the warming house at Lewis Park and to replace it with a structure serving coffee, drinks, snacks or food along side with a smaller warming house. We do acknowledge that the warming house may need replacement or renovation. We do not believe that the current footprint of the warming house is large enough to accommodate a warming house, Zamboni garage and a "gathering space" where any meetings or gatherings beyond a few people could take place without the loss of green space, the ice skating rink, or the hockey rink which we oppose. This Association has good reason to be opposed to a project that on first blush appears to be a donation of a "free building" to the City. We oppose any private investment or interest on public land, regardless of its characterization as a loan with a payback clause, gift, or donation of a building. We do not believe it serves the community to commercialize public park land. We are concerned about the potential loss of any green space. We do not believe the city should be involved in indirectly assisting (by the temporary grant of the use of public land) a business that competes with the loyal, established, tax- paying businesses at 70th and Cahill. We are concerned about the design of the building blending in with the high density residences of the neighborhood and being unobtrusive. There are troublesome issues that are not immediately apparent in the proposal presented to the Park Board that we believe are causes of concern. 1. What exactly is this "gift of a building" or "5% loan" and what are the conditions? Is it a private investment in a building on public land, thereby constituting the taking (even though temporary) of public property? Would the donor retain any rights until the investment, donation or a return on investment was recouped? What are the proposed forfeiture, or default terms? Would the private individuals post a performance bond, give bank references, to assure performance before any time and resources of the City are spent? Would they guarantee covering 100% of the construction costs, reimburse developmental costs to the City, and guarantee a net operating profit for 15 years so the City /taxpayers do not have to subsidize the project? 2. We do not believe the size of the proposed coffee house /gathering spot would be sufficient to allow it to ever be financially independent to support the payment of full time staff, overhead G�(Y C/ supplies, maintenance, etc. This would become a burden.to the City, and ultimately the taxpayers would have to pay for the running of this business venture. The location is not O �1 appropriate for another coffee shop and we feel it would detract from the character of th Lewis Park. Just as importantly, it would take business away from the privately owned toff shops and restaurants at 701h and Cahill that have worked hard to establish themselves. I There are already sufficient gathering spots and coffee shops around our City, both commercial stores, such as Caribou Coffee and Starbucks; and public facilities in the schools, libraries, community center, Senior Center, etc. 4. We are not opposed to the renovation or replacement of the warming house, and do not resist change or improvement in our neighborhood or Park. To state such is a mischaracterization of our concern. 5. We do support the keeping of public land separate from "private investment," even in the form of a "donation of a building" if any conditions are attached such as the recouping of construction costs, a built in return on investment or controldcgffg over the design are imposed. Sincerely, Casandra Mihalchick, President of Lewis Park Neighborhood Association Lela luIitC@aol.com, 952 - 929 -2900, cell 6127791 -4899, 7227 Lewis Ridge Parkway, Edina, MN. 55439 - ;1 LEWIS PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION Who we are: A consortium of townhome and condominium associations, organizations, neighborhood businesses, and individuals that are opposed to the proposal to tear down the warming house at Lewis Park and replace it with a structure that has a coffee shop that serves food and a smaller warming house. What our philosophy is: We believe that the preservation and integrity of Edina neighborhood parks.should be maintained and kept in the public sphere and kept from private investment, ownership, or influence. Some of the reasons we are opposed to the "A Better Lewis Park" Proposal a. We do not believe the taking of public property, even for a brief time period, by private investors serves the community. b. We do not believe there is adequate space to support the proposed new building and that the loss of any more green space would not be in the best interest of the community. c. We do not believe that the proposal for the coffee shop /community center is financially viable and that the City will end up having to support it because it would not be self - sustaining. d. We believe that local businesses would be detrimentally affected by competition from the venture. Please write, call or email the Edina City Mayor, all City Council Members, City Manager, and the Park Board to express your opposition. If you would like more information, or want to assist us in our. cause, please call Casandra Mihalchick, Head of the Association, at 952 - 929 -2900, cell 612- 791 -4899, or email her at LelalulitC@aol.com = =,,TYC ,,)1 r`J Deb Mangen From: Jennifer Bennerotte ,t: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 1:23 PM Deb Mangen Subject: FW: the big picture Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 jennerotte @ci.edina.mn.us From: Belanger, Brian A (STP) [ma ilto: Brian. Bela nger@guida nt.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 11:33 AM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: the big picture To the members of the City Council of Edina: I o..,;nded both the Nov 20th and Dec 4th meetings of the council. It was my first time seeing such meetings in person. I must say I was impressed with your professionalism, as well as the organization of the meetings, and the quality of the facilities. Wrestling with the often contentious issues you must resolve cannot be easy. No matter what you do you are bound to disappoint, or even anger and alienate one group of citizens. I appreciate the job you all do, and the fairness with which you operate. Having said that, I do disagree with the decision to forego a moratorium on house tear downs. Please, please, please, please act quickly to update the building codes to protect our neighborhood. Some kind of FAR is absolutely needed to prevent further strip mining of our neighborhoods character. I will be living on pins an needles for the coming months as I wait for the changes you will make, dreading the inevitable For Sale signs on lots being assimilated into the McMansion culture. I think the truest and most apt comment from last night was when Council Member Swenson said words to the effect of "I (we ?) have failed you by not developing new building codes sooner'. I say that not so much as a complaint against your abilities, but rather as an observation of the reality of the city government. You all seem smart and hard working, yet years go by and we still don't have the protections we need for our neighborhood. Delays cause irreparable damage. The same seems to be true of the issue of the Country Club Neighborhood improvements, where delay has resulted in huge cost increases. Obviously all delays aren't the fault of the Council, yet it seems to me that the big picture lesson to be taken from these issues is that the wheels of government are grinding too slowly. I'm not a fan of "Big Government ", but I am a fan of efficient government. It seems it might be the case here that bigger could be more efficient. Spending money to beef up the Council, Staff, advisors, etc... might allow decisions to be made more quickly, which would end up saving the city and citizens millions. It could also have saved the face of our neighborhood, which is without a price. Thank You, Brian Belanger F"-'' Oaklawn 12/5/2007 Brian Belanger Senior Electrical Engineer Test Engineering Boston Scientific Corporation 4100 Hamline Avenue North St. Paul, MN 55112 -5798 USA Tel: 651.582.3150 Fax: 651.582.2945 Cell: 952.412.3611 brian.belanger @Guidant.com www.bostonscientific.com 12/5/2007 Deb Mangen From: Jennifer Bennerotte t: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 11:05 AM Deb Mangen Subject: FW: City Council Meeting C N. SEP'l Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 jbennerofte@ci.edina.mn.us From: Connie Carrino [mailto:CRCarrino @msn.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2007 11:01 AM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: City Council Meeting TO: The Honorable Mayor James Hovland City Council Members, Joni Bennett, Scot Housh, Linda Masica and Ann Swenson CC: Gordon Hughes, City Manager Cary Teague, City Planner Jennifer Bennerotte, Marketing and Communications My husband and I attended the City Council meeting last night. Although we honored the "code of conduct" and held our applause last night, we do so now, via this email: We applaud all of you for how you handled the comments, criticism and process that led you to last night's decision and vote regarding the proposed moratorium. It took a lot of courage to explain your positions - -your original consideration of a moratorium and then what lead you to decide it just wasn't the way to go for the entire city of Edina. I especially liked what I heard from each Council member: That the City Council and Officials will work harder to come up with a development plan that addresses transitioning housing needs in a community that has property owners with varying needs. We trust your plan and revised ordnances will include fair and equitable solutions that both respect the charm of historical neighborhoods, but allow for improvements and updates; and that allow for more contemporary, design - forward homes to be built/rebuilt by homeowners who live in neighborhoods where appropriate. We also understand you may have some relationship building to do with the residents of Oaklawn. We'd like homeowners there to know that we actually do understand their issues, but that a moratorium on the entire city just isn't the right solution. It isn't a vote in favor of massing or against smaller, charming homes and historical neighborhoods, just against punishing all residents for what has already been done on their street. We do hope the Council will consider taking -up the offer from the gentleman who spoke last night, a resident of Oaklawn who renovated his home (can't recall his name) and who offered to serve on an Advisory Board or task force - -he seemed to understand the issues at -hand. 3king of an Advisory Board or task force: If it is something that the Council is considering, we encourage you to balance it ..,,n residents from various neighborhoods and professionals from construction, design and engineering. We know there are many reasonable and knowledgeable resources available to the Council. Finally, we recognize this has been a daunting issue and process - -we got involved late in the game and can only imagine what 12/5/2007 you've been going through since the beginning. We hope you will find a little comfort in knowing that at least from the homeowners perspectives, and no matter which side of the issue, that the passionate views and opinions shared one common point: We all love and appreciate our community. Thank you for your service to Edina and especially for your courage last night. If you have any questions or if we can offer, assistance as you move forward, please feel free to contact.us. Respectfully, Connie Carrino Jeff Miller 4509 Garrison Lane Edina, MN 55424 952.926.4839 952.920.2111 - Connie's home office P.S. Also, thank you for reviewing our issue with Section H of Edina City Code 850.11, Subsection 7. You may see us at a variance hearing if we decide to rebuild on this lot, which we are in the process of discussing with various sources. 12/5/2007 Dec 04 2007 15:40:06 Via Fax -> Administrator Page 001 Of 001 Leadership Conference j�,AGUE of fo, x eri*enced &JINNESOTA e e CITIES Officials Building Public Confidence: Everyday Ethics for Minnesota Public Officials Bloomington. Learn to navigate through a sea of ethical uncertainties! Jan. 18-19, 2008 As a city offical, you often face situations for which Its hard to find the right answer. Join Judy Nadler former mayor of Santa Clara, CA and senior fellow at the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics at Santa Clara University —in exploring the fundamentals of government ethics Registration fee: and learning ways to navigate tough, ethical dilemmas through Inter- active exercises with your peers. $210 (includes meals and materials) In Justtwo days, your city team --city manager /administrator /clerk and elected officials —will: • Gain a framework for ethical decision - making • Work interactively In groups to create your own ethical Platinum -Level Sponsor: solutions RBC Daln Rauscher • Learn from real -life ethical case studies - aM Fund Administrator • Build camaraderie with your city colleagues Gold -Level Sponsors: Leave with a concrete plan for creating, strengthening, Ehlers & Associates, Inc. and maintaining a culture of ethics in your organization PMA Financial Network am Fund administrator. As you and your city team explore the concept of ethics, you'll also Voyageur Asset Management develop a strong sense of camaraderie, gaining a firm foundation on aM Fund Administrator which to build, strengthen, and maintain a culture of ethics. Register online at: www.imc.org Dec 05 Z007 15:46:49 Via Fax -> Mayor Houland Page 001 Of 001 THE UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS TV_o EYEsrRFFt; NORTHWEST WASKINarON. TS.G 20000 •I•1pFT0NE (-I= 273-7330 FAX (202) 293.052 URI: w - "u9nQY=-0n3 TO: The Mayor FROM: Tom Cochran, Executive Director SUBJECT: White House Confcrence Call on the Housing and Mortaaae Markets The White House has asked that I forward this invitation to you. THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON The Office of Intergovernmental Affairs invites you to join: Brian Montgomery Federal Housing Commissioner, Federal Housing Administration Neel Kashkari Senior Advisor to Secretary Paulson at the Department of Treasury for a call to discuss the housing and mortgage markets The call will be held on Thursday, December 6 at 4:30 P.M. (EST) The Call -in number is (8001230-1092 Please be sure to reference the White House Conference Call on the Housing Market This invitation is non - transferable. RSVP: Please respond to Joohee Jung at (202) 456 -2896 or Joohee_Jung_Intern@who.eop. gov no later than Thursday December 6, 2007 at 2:00 p.m. to confirm participation. Dec 04 2007 16:15:33 Via Fax _> Mayor Hovland Fd9C 001 Of 005 t..A. r m C0 ..... U.— ....... ... 4-K - Ar. '11 W14 j X 1620 E" 5treet, N.W. @Washington, D.C. 20005 Phone (202) 293-7330 • Fax (202) 293-2352 E-mail: infoeusmayors.org URL. www.usmayors.org/usem TO: Edina FROM: Please share with your urban forester and local tree organizations. Deadline is Friday, December 14th. ATTN: Mayor James Hovland TO: FAX PHONE#: 19528260390 TIME: Tue 04 Dec 2007 04:07:29 PM EST MRN: 27915234-009-251-0117 5 PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET Dec 04 2007 16:15:57 Via Fax -> Mayor Houland Page 802 Of 005 OUNDATION Building Affordable Healthy Homes 2008 AWARDS OF EXCELLENCE FOR COMMUNITY TREES PRELIMINARY APPLICATION DEADLINE IS FRIDAY, December '14TH The U.S. Conference of Mayors/The Home Depot Foundation invite you to enter the 2008 Awards of Excellence for Community Trees. The application process is easy and user friendly. To access the preliminary application and the awards overview and guidelines, please go to www.usmayors.org /trees Awards will be presented in two categories: cities with populations over 100,000 residents and those 'with fewer than 100,000 residents. Within each category, two grant awards will be made - $75,000 to the winning project and $25,000 to the runner up. Outstanding Achievement Awards of $2,500 each will also be given in each category. The awards will be given at the Conference of Mayors 76th Annual Meeting in Miami being held June 20 -24, 2008. THE DEADLINE FOR PRELIMINARY APPLICATIONS IS NEXT FRIDAY, DECEMBER 14TH If you have any questions about the program or what qualifies as an eligible project, please contact either DeAnn Fordham, The Home Depot Foundation at (770)384 -5389 or DeAnn Fordharn0homedepot com or USCM staff contact Tom McClimon at (202)861 -6729 or mcclimonCc_usmayors.ora. FOUNDATION Building Affordable Healthy Homes Mayor Hovland 2008 AWARDS OF EXCELLENCE For COMMUNITY TREES OVERVIEW & GUIDELINES The Home Depot Foundation, in partnership with the U.S. Conference of Mayors, is proud to announce the opening of the application period for the Third Annual Awards of Excellence for Community Trees. The Home Depot Foundation believes that the urban forest is one of the essential building blocks for healthy, livable communities impacting our social, environmental, economic and overall well- being. In addition, we strongly believe that the simple act of planting a tree has the power to be the catalyst for significant ecological improvements and profound community change. Accordingly, we have established the Awards of Excellence for Community Trees, the goals of which are: • To identify, recognize and showcase outstanding, innovative work of public/pdvate partnerships engaged in enhancing and strengthening communities through the strategic use of trees. a To promote the exchange of best practices and encourage cities around the country to adopt and implement strategic tree planting programs in partnership with local nonprofits. • To increase the public's knowledge, understanding and appreciation of trees and their role in creating healthy, sustainable communities. Eligible Prolects /Programs The Home Depot Foundation recognizes that cities across the country, in partnership with local nonprofits, are achieving outstanding results in urban forestry both on a project basis and programmatic level. Awards will be given on the overall excellence of the initiative based on the work completed prior to July 31, 2007 (ongoing projects/programs will be evaluated on the work completed). Applications will be assessed based on the extent to which the initiative incorporates the following criteria: • Demonstrated partnership between city government and one or more local nonprofits having a 501(c)(3) status i Exhibited innovation in the development and enhancement of a city's urban forest Dec 04 2007 16:17:16 Via Fax -> Mayor Houland Page 004 Of 005 • Demonstrated exceptional city leadership • Established benchmark measures for evaluating the success of the program/project and an assessment of whether these measures have been achieved • Incorporated the urban forest into community revitalization plans and infrastructure improvements • Engaged the community and multiple partners • Enhanced the livability of a city or targeted neighborhood • Demonstrated the ecological function of the urban forest • Provided clear understanding and attention to sustainability • Provided a model that is replicable by others Award Categories and Monetary Benefits Awards will be presented in two population categories: • Cities with fewer than 100,000 people • Cities with a population of 100,000 or more Based on the first round applications, a group of finalists will be selected. Within each category two grant awards will be made -- $75,000 to the winning project and $25,000 to the runner -up. Outstanding Achievement Awards of $2,500 each will also be given In each category. All finalists will receive recognition at the US Conference of Mayors' Annual Meeting in June 2008. An independent Advisory Committee of experts will select project winners. While both the city and the nonprofit partner will be recognized, the grant will be awarded to the nonprofit partner to be used at their discretion for charitable purposes to further the goal of promoting healthy communities through tree planting and the management of the urban forest. Other Benefits of the Awards Program • City leadership and their nonprofit partner agency will be recognized for their outstanding accomplishment during the Annual Meeting of the Conference of Mayors in June 2008 in Miami • A hand - crafted award suitable for public display as a symbol of the city's and nonprofit's exemplary vision and leadership • The issuance of press releases announcing the award winners • Publication in U.S. Mayor, the twice- monthly news publication of the Conference of Mayors, and a description of winning programs on the Conference's Internet Web site, as well as The Home Depot Foundation's website • Assistance in planning and conducting a local ceremony, in which the Awards of Excellence will be presented again to the mayor by representatives from the Conference of Mayors and The Home Depot Foundation 2 Dec 04 2007 16:17:54 Via Fax -> Mayor Houland Page 005 Of 005 Evaluation Process The Awards of Excellence program employs a two -step process. The first step involves completing an online application, which will be reviewed by the staff of The Home Depot Foundation. Applications that demonstrate that the initiative described meets the assessment criteria will be invited to complete the second round application that will be reviewed by the independent Advisory Committee. The second round application MUST be completed online and will be available to eligible organizations at a password - protected site. No hard copies of the application will be accepted. In addition to the second round application, before an application will be considered complete, The Home Depot Foundation must also receive hard copies of the following: • A letter of support or recommendation from the Mayor's office (if application is being submitted from a nonprofit rather than the Mayor's office) • Before and after photos of the project site • Letters of support from up to three community stakeholders • Landscape and maintenance plan (if applicable) Winners will be recommended to The Home Depot Foundation and the Conference of Mayors by an independent Advisory Committee comprised of experts in the field of urban forestry, environment and sustainable community development. By way of example, in 2007 the Advisory Committee members were associated with organizations including: Alliance for Community Trees, National Arbor Day Foundation, Trust for Public Land, University of Washington, USDA Forest Service, Enterprise Community Partners' Green Communities Initiative, American Society of Landscape Architects, and a former mayor. Timeline October 19 First round application is available December 14 Deadline for the first round application January 11 Second round finalists announced February 29 Deadline for second round applications June 26 Awards announced at the U-S. Conference of Mayors Annual Meeting in Miami, FL How to Apply Any city or nonprofit organization interested in submitting a first -round application for the Awards of Excellence Program for Community Trees should go to https://www.cirantrequest-com/SID 248 ?SA =SNA&FID=35032 The deadline for on -line submission of the first round application is midnight, Eastern Standard Time, December 14, 2007. Applications received after the deadline will not be reviewed. 3 Please distribute to the following: To the Mayor, City Council, Park Board, City Manager, City Planner of Edina My name is Mark Litman and I live in the townhomes that are adjacent to Lewis Park. I strongly oppose the proposal to tear down the warming house and replace it with a structure that includes any type of food or drink service or any private investment in parkland. I am against the commercialization of public land by private investors, especially when it competes with existing established private businesses. What was classified as a "gift, or a donation of a building" is in fact a disguised private enterprise on public land. It results in the private group running a business on public land until they recoup their investment, (regardless of whether they build in an established return on investment or not), and also provides for a significant tax deduction in the form of depreciation. What type of precedent would you be establishing if you allowed this? Also, there are serious potential liability issues that would not be easy to access or clearly define, such as where would the city /taxpayers responsibility and liability begin and end and at what point would it be the private investors. Surely Edina has public officials or appointees with a more thorough and informed background on what is appropriate use of the Park. Why would you allow private groups to come in and tell you how to use public property? The construction of yet another coffee house convenient to where children play soccer, football and hockey should not drive determination of what is appropriate use of public land. Why can't the parents bring their drinks with them to the Park like they do elsewhere? Do we need to provide yet another opportunity for litter in the parks, sugary drinks, or more caffeine in the community? Let's keep our public parks separate from private investment regardless of how a deal is packaged to the Park Board and the City Council. Look through the veil of "the gift" to see what lies beneath, the true nature of this proposal is the running of a private business on public parkland. Don't let semantics cloud your judgment in the consideration of this proposal. Sincerely, Mark A. Litman GC�14�A ^ r 7227 Lewis Ridge Parkway Edina, Mn. 55439 952 - 832 -9090, Cell 612 - 965 -3755 Minutes of the Edina Park Board November 13, 2007 Edina City Hall, Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Ray O'Connell, Todd Fronek, Linda Presthus, Jeff Sorem, Mike Damman, Carolyn Nelson, Andy Finsness, Howard Merriam MEMBERS ABSENT: Randy Meyer, George Klus STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Ed MacHolda, Janet Canton I. APPROVAL OF THE OCTOBER 9.2007 PARK BOARD MINUTES Linda Presthus MOVED TO APPROVE THE OCTOBER 9, 2007 PARK BOARD MINUTES. Mike Damman SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. II. NEW BUSINESS A. Proposed Coffee Shop at Lewis Park — Carolyn Kohrs went over the proposal that she presented at last month's Park Board meeting. Ms. Kohrs explained that the original proposal in regards to public /private ventures on parkland proposal has been modified. It now states that as soon as the building is constructed it will immediately be donated to the city. The city will take immediate control over the entire property, therefore eliminating the issues regarding property taxes and insurance. She noted that it also simplified the legal piece of it in that it is a lease agreement that sets up expectations from the city and the community investment group so that everyone understands how the procedure.will go. Ms. Kohrs did point out that the park is currently zoned as residential and therefore they may need to have some kind of a variance use. Ms. Kohrs indicated that regarding the businesses at Cahill and 70th she went in person to the businesses and was able to talk to the owners to which she was happy to hear that in every single case people were supportive. Ms. Kohrs pointed out their intent is not so much to build a coffee shop but rather a gathering place for the residents. Ms. Kohrs noted that she met with an executive from the Dunn Brothers Coffee Shop in Eden Prairie and showed her the projected net income she came up with. The person from Dunn Brothers thought she did a good job and thought the numbers were very conservative. She also thought the proposed area was in a great location and was very encouraging. Ms. Kohrs stated that in regards to the concerns about the actual building when they get to that stage everyone will have a say as to the size, shape, space, etc. Ms. Kohrs informed the Park Board that after last month's Park Board meeting she created a website and has relied on word of mouth to get the information out to the residents. She noted that as of 3:00 pm today there were 458 survey responses /petitions signed to which 95.64% were for it and 4.4% were against it. She stated that there have been some negative comments although she thinks for the most part they could be managed through community input and design. Sandy Remes, 7420 Shannon Circle, stated that she is in favor of the Coffee Shop at Lewis Park. Mr. Finsness asked if the seed money for the project has been identified to which Ms. Kohrs replied that right now she has a commitment of one -half million dollars. She stated that as they go forward if they need to generate more money she is willing to figure out how to get more money committed. Ms. Presthus asked Ms. Kohrs to explain the financial arrangements such as who will take care of the maintenance and upkeep of the building. Ms. Kohrs replied that the revenue generated from the operations of the coffee shop will pay for all of the maintenance and upkeep of all of the operations. She noted that conservatively they think it will generate approximately $50,000 a year which would be generated back to the seed capital. Once that money is recouped the revenue flow would go directly to the city because it is the city that would have control of the building. Ms. Presthus commented "assuming that it doesn't do that, then what would happen ". Ms. Kohrs replied that if it doesn't do that then the city can do with it what it wants. She noted that her feeling is the risk that is being taken by the community investors that want to make this happen. Mr. Finsness asked Ms. Kohrs if there is an estimate on what the building would cost. Ms. Kohrs replied it will cost approximately $400,000 to build and approximately $100,000 for all of the coffee supplies. The following people who spoke were not in favor of a coffee shop at Lewis Park: William S. McKenzie, 6250 Lewis Ridge Parkway, spoke on behalf of the people from the Lewis Ridge Condominiums. He pointed out that he did talk to one of the owners of Honkins Joes and that person was very upset about it. Barbara Hustad, 5501 Dewey Hill, spoke on behalf of the people from Edina Dewey Hill East Dick Langert, 5501 Dewey Hill Rd. Cassandra Moholchick, 7227 Lewis Ridge Parkway Beth Waterman, 7220 Lewis Ridge Parkway. The following people who spoke were in favor of a coffee shop at Lewis Park: Claudia Westholder, 7448 Shannon Drive Chrissy Colby, 7416 Coventry Way Susan Donovan, 7404 Shannon Drive Duke Bascam, 7505 Gleason Road 2 Jim Callclaisus, 4908 Arden Avenue Sharon Burns, 6012 Dublin Circle Pam Berling, 4129 w. 62 "d St. David Cherner, 5829 Dewey Hill Rd. Todd Fronek MOVED TO REMOVE THE ITEM FROM THE TABLE. Jeff Sorem SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. O'Connell indicated that he has listened to both the pros and cons and has spent a lot of time looking at it from all angles. However, the most pertinent thing he has heard is there needs to be a meeting of the minds. Mr. Fronek stated that he is very hesitant to take public land away from the public and no matter how you want to slice it this is taking public land and making it a private enterprise. He noted that another concern he has is over the development of parks. He indicated that one of the greatest uses of parks is getting away from everything and getting out into green space and into nature. Ms. Nelson stated that she doesn't necessarily see park space as going into nature all of the time but also sees it as a place to gather with friends, walk a dog, etc. She noted that she agrees with the proposed building because even though it is a private ownership it really would benefit the public. Mr. Sorem stated that on one hand he is looking at it and saying it is an awfully nice building that the city is going to get and it appears to be pretty low risk. However, on the other hand it is one of the largest community parks they have in Edina and therefore they need to decide what is best for the city as a whole and not just the Lewis Park neighborhood. He pointed out that warming house is used by a lot of people right after work every day. Therefore, the drawings would need to make sure that the warming house is a big part of the building. He stated that he is in agreement with Mr. O'Connell in that it probably needs to be discussed further and he would be in favor of supporting getting together with some different groups and discussing this further even if it's in a smaller group setting and not as a formal Park Board. Mr. Damman stated that he thinks this is a great idea. However, he is not positive that Lewis Park is the perfect place for it. He noted that they definitely need a new building at Lewis Park, he's not so sure about a private enterprise. He added that they would probably need to look at doing a feasibility study on it. Mr. Merriam indicated that he strongly believes there is a seed of an idea and he would hate to see all of this work go to waste. He noted that he has heard some very serious concerns from some of the neighbors. He stated that maybe they need to get some of the concerned neighbors together in a room and figure out how something could work. He noted that he sees an opportunity for a gathering space. Ms. Presthus stated that she lived by Lewis Park for 16 years and walked it just about every day and noted one of the things she loved the most about the park is that there wasn't much there. Ms. Presthus pointed out there are places in the community that 3 could really use something like this such as Edinborough Park but the city doesn't have the money to do it. Ms. Presthus commented that at last month's meeting she asked for input from the businesses and not just the residents because she is very concerned about those businesses that are a block away. She pointed out that she has just heard testimony that the businesses want this yet in their packet is a letter stating that they don't want it. However, all of this has been hearsay and none of it has been first hand. Therefore, she really feels that they need the input of those businesses before they should even consider something like this. Ms. Presthus also indicated that in the past they have discussed putting in artificial ice as well as using a Zamboni to resurface the ice at Lewis Park. Therefore, they need to look ahead to the future because Lewis Park has one of the biggest hockey and skating rinks. Mr. Finsness noted that he personally thinks this is a good idea because it sounds like there is some private money available. He indicated that he would be in favor of further discussions. Mr. Keprios stated that if the Park Board is in support of this concept and proposal and would like for this to move to the next step in the process, then his recommendation would be for the Park Board to hold a public hearing. He noted that he would also recommend that staff meet with Ms. Kohrs and come up with some answers to some of the questions such as the zoning issue, financial agreement, maintenance, etc. He commented that it is important to have a more definitive proposal in writing from Ms. Kohrs for staff and Park Board to review. Mr. Keprios suggested that perhaps staff could work with the proponent to discuss it further with the neighborhood and then move forward with an official public meeting. He pointed out that if the Park Board chooses to conduct a public hearing, staff would mail out notices to every property owner within 1,000 feet of the park which would include all businesses and residents. Mr. Fronek asked if this is something that would need to be approved by the Planning Commission. Mr. Keprios replied that he thinks where the Planning Commission would get involved would be when it gets to the zoning issue to which they would then have their own public hearing to go through their process as well. He stressed that concept wise it needs to start here. Mr. O'Connell indicated that he thinks this is a good concept however, the problem is utilization. The park belongs to the city and the taxpayers take care of it and it's the Park Board's job to see that it is put to the best use. He stated that he feels it's necessary to try to get some meeting of the minds and then go to the process of having a public hearing. Ray O'Connell MOVED TO TAKE THIS CONCEPT TO THE NEXT STEP IN THE PROCESS BY DIRECTING STAFF TO GET ANSWERS IN WRITING FROM THE PROPONENT TO THE QUESTIONS THAT WERE BROUGHT UP THIS EVENING AND HAVE THE MATTER ON THE JANUARY 8, 2008 PARK 4 BOARD AGENDA FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION. Jeff Sorem SECONDED THE MOTION. IN FAVOR: Howard Merriam, Mike Damman, Andy Finsness, Jeff Sorem, Carolyn Nelson, Ray O'Connell OPPOSED: Linda Presthus, Todd Fronek MOTION CARRIED. B. Non - Resident Patron Card Proposal — Braemar Golf Course — This item will be presented at the December Park Board meeting. III. OLD BUSINESS A. Countryside Park Master Plan — Mr. Keprios introduced Greg Ingraham and Anna Claussen, architects from the firm Hoisington Koegler. He noted that they were hired to do some master plan concept drawings of Countryside Park. Mr. Ingraham and Ms. Claussen show six different concept drawings from staff s perspective on the important amenities. He noted that he would like feedback from the Park Board as to whether they think a particular plan is a great idea or specific pieces of the various plans that should be included in the master plan. He explained that what they are trying to do is get a consensus on a concept plan and direction for improvement to the park. Mr. O' Connell noted that he personally likes plans one and six because of the way they are set up. Ms. Presthus indicated that the features she would like is to keep are open space, basketball court, dog park, smaller shelter and no hockey rink. Mr. Finsness noted that he agrees with Ms. Presthus. Mr. O'Connell asked Mr. Damman in conversations and planning which plan did he like the best to which Mr. Damman replied he believes they were plans two and five. Mr. Finsness asked is there currently a budget for this park. Mr. Keprios replied that currently there is no budget to develop the park and there is no financing vehicle in place. He pointed out that to do it all at once we would probably need to have to rely on a referendum. He stated that another option would be to slowly piece meal it through a capital improvement plan. Mr. Merriam commented the he personally likes concept three. Mr. Keprios asked the Park Board how they feel about the hockey question. Mr. Sorem replied that a hockey rink really didn't work real well there and unless everything was completely redone and it was put in a different location he would be in favor of getting rid of it. Mr. Keprios asked the Park Board to forward any other ideas they might have after tonight on to him. He stated that he would also like to discuss when the Park Board would want to show these concepts to the neighbors. He stated that he thinks it's premature and it would be a mistake if they don't have the financing in place. Ms. Presthus asked what it would cost to do concept five to which Mr. Ingraham replied he would guess approximately one million dollars. It might be cheaper than that but probably not too much. Mr. Keprios asked if he hears a consensus on holding this off for the neighborhood for now to which Mr. Finsness replied he thinks that makes sense. Mr. Keprios suggested that he take the comments he's heard and give everyone a few weeks to think about it and then he will regroup with staff and the architects to come up with a plan or two on what has been said and see where that leads them. Mr. Fronek made one final comment and stated that he likes the idea of having a distinguishing feature in a park as a way to differentiate it. He noted that he does like the idea of a rain garden or a bridge. B. Pamela Park Athletic Field Project Update — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that he does not have enough money to pursue a study at this point. He noted that he would like to be able to pursue this next year through the operating budget whether they have the fundraising dollars or not. He stated that he thinks it's a viable project and they ought to keep it in their capital plan. He noted that the plan would be to put in artificial turf with lights and it would be located just to the north and slightly west of the existing fields. C. Athletic Association Presidents Meeting — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that they had a very good athletic association presidents meeting. He noted that they are doing a great job and seem very supportive of the relationship document that the Park Board recommended to the Council which was approved. He stated that he thinks it is working very well for them. IV. UPDATES FROM STAFF A. 2007 Park Improvement Projects Presentation — Mr. Keprios gave a Power Point presentation to the Park Board showing photos of several 2007 park improvement projects that been completed. B. Bike Edina Task Force — Mr. Merriam asked if it would be possible for the Bike Edina task force to give the Park Board a presentation on their final report. Mr. Fronek replied that he will ask someone from task force to do that. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 10:00 p.m. 11 IV, Lewis Park Neighborhood Association, To: the Mayor of Edina, City Council, City Manager, Finance Manager, and Park Board: My name is Casandra Mihalchick and I serve as President of the Lewis Park Neighborhood Association. We are a consortium of townhome associations and condominium associations, neighborhood businesses and individuals. We all are opposed to the proposal to tear down the warming house at Lewis Park and to replace it with a structure serving coffee, drinks, snacks or food along side with a smaller warming house. We do acknowledge that the warming house may need replacement or renovation. We do not believe that the current footprint of the warming house is large enough to accommodate a warming house, Zambonl garage and a °gathering space" where any meetings or gatherings beyond a few people could take place without the loss of green space, the ice skating rink, or the hockey rink which we oppose. This Association has good reason to be opposed to a project that on first blush appears to be a donation of a "free building" to the City. We oppose any private investment or interest on public land, regardless of its characterization As a loan with a payback clause, gift, or donation of a building. We do not believe it serves the community to commercialize public park land. We are concerned about the potential loss of any green space. We do not believe the city should be involved in indirectly assisting (by the temporary grant of the use of public land) a business that competes with the loyal, established, tax- paying businesses at 7& and Cahill. We are concerned about the design of the building blending In with the high density residences of the neighborhood and being unobtrusive. There are troublesome issues that are not immediately apparent in the proposal presented to the Park Board that we believe are causes of concern. 1. What exactly is this "gift of a building" or "5% loan" and what are the conditions? Is it a private investment in a building on public land, thereby constituting the taking (even though temporary) of public property? Would the donor retain any rights until the investment, donation or a return on investment was recouped? What are the proposed forfeiture, or default terms? Would the private individuals post a performance bond, give bank references, to assure performance before any time and resources of the City are spent? Would they guarantee covering 100% of the construction costs, reimburse developmental costs to the City, and guarantee a net operating profit for 15 years so the City /taxpayers do not have to subsidize the project? 2. We do not believe the size of the proposed coffee house /gathering spot would be sufficient to allow it to ever be financially independent to support the payment of full time staff, overhead, supplies, maintenance, etc. This would become a burden to the City, and ultimately the taxpayers would have to pay for the running of this business venture. The location is not. appropriate for another coffee shop and we feel it would detract from the character of the Lewis Park. Just as importantly, it would take business away from the privately owned coffee shops and restaurants at 700 and Cahill that have worked hard to establish themselves. 3. There are already sufficient gathering spots and coffee shops around our City, both commercial stores, such as Caribou Coffee and Starbucks; and public facilities in the schools, libraries, community center, Senior Center, etc. 4. We are not opposed to the renovation or replacement of the warming house, and do not resist change or improvement in our neighborhood or Park. To state such is a mischaracterization of our concern. S. We do support the keeping of public land separate from "private investment," even in the form of a "donation of a building" if any conditions are attached such as the recouping of construction costs, a built in return on investment or control over the design are imposed. Sincerely, �J Casandra Mihalchick, President of Lewis Park Neighborhood Association Lelalulit@aol.com. 952 - 929 -2900, cell 612- 791 -4899, 7227 Lewis Ridge Parkway, Edina, MN. 55439 LEWIS PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION Who we are: A consortium of townhome and condominium associations, organizations, neighborhood businesses, and individuals that are opposed to the proposal to tear down the warming house at Lewis Park and replace it with a structure that has a coffee shop that serves food and a smaller warming house. What our philosophy is: We believe that the preservation and integrity of Edina neighborhood parks should be maintained and kept in the public sphere and kept from private investment, ownership, or influence. Some of the reasons we are opposed to the 'A Better Lewis ParV Proposal a. We do not believe the taking of public property, even for a brief time period, by private investors serves the community. b. We do not believe there is adequate space to support the proposed new building and that the loss of any more green space would not be in the best interest of the community. c. We do not believe that the proposal for the coffee shop /community center is financially viable and that the City will end up having to support it because it would not be self - sustaining. d. We believe that local businesses would be detrimentally affected by competition from the venture. Please write, call or email the Edina City Mayor, all City Council Members, City Manager, and the Park Board to express your opposition. If you would like more informadon, or want to assist us in our cause, please call Casandra Mihalchick, Head of the Association, at 952 - 929 -2900, cell 612- 791 -4899, or email her at Lelalulit@aol.com ammY's dubs anb Zalabs Now at Two Locations 7031 Cahill Road Edina,MN 55439 6407 City West Pkwy Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Phone 952 -516 -7800 Fax 952 -516 -7801 Phone 952- 903 -5305 Fax 952 -903 -5306 John Keprios Edina City Hall As a new business owner in Edina I was approached by an individual with a request to build a new skating rink building. When I gave my approval I was under the impression that it was a warming house with a non profit concession stand, run by volunteers. If it is to be a coffee shop run for profit I am adamantly opposed to it That would be in direct completion with the Sub shop that I have just started. I have been involved in the food industry for the past 30 years, and have run my own business for the last 5 years. I have many concerns with the information I have received so far. Any information you could afford me before the January 8'b meeting would be appreciated. Thank you,