Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-06-03_COUNCIL MEETINGo� I a REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council 0 Agenda Item Work Session From: Heather Worthington Consent Assistant City Manager Information Only Date: June 3, 2008 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Work Session Materials Action F-1 Motion Resolution Ordinance Discussion Info/Background- Attached are materials for use during the June 3, 2008 Work Session. +J AV Information for 06 -03 -08 Edina City Council work session — Comp Plan Update Land Use: Mixed Use Development How is mixed -use development working in the Twin Cities market, especially with housing over commercial? Several metro area projects offer some lessons: Excelsior and Grand, St. Louis Park Kensington Park, 77b and Lyndale, Richfield City Bella, 66th and Lyndale, Richfield Woodlake Centre, Richfield Village at Mendota Heights / Linden Lofts Town Square, Falcon Heights All of these projects were developed within the last six years, in accordance with design principles that called for walkable, dense, mixed use site plans with an emphasis on design and high quality amenities. All were designed to be transit - oriented, with some accommodation to the automobile. The following pages describe these projects and provide a commentary on their vitality and viability. Information for 06 -03 -08 Edina City Council work session — Comp Plan Update Land Use: Mixed Use Development Excelsior and Grand, St. Louis Park (43 units per acre) Developed by the TOLD corporation, Excelsior and Grand is a 15 -acre mixed -use development, part of a larger 125 -acre downtown called Park Commons. The site included blighted, auto - oriented commercial development along Excelsior Blvd., adjacent to 35 -acre Wolfe Park and a recreation center (connecting to the metro region's trail network and a planned light rail corridor. The project also included a complete redesign of Excelsior Blvd. into a 4 -lane landscaped avenue with parallel parking, the creation of a 1.5 acre Grand Way public green, mixed retail and housing (644 housing units, 88,000 sq. ft. of retail) in a vertical format, and 1,650 shared parking spaces in underground and structured mid -block garages. Housing is half rental and half owner - occupied, with affordable units on site. This $180 million project used approx. $30 million in public financing, including tax increment financing (TIF) and grants from the Met Council. The consensus among the parties involved, and the development community in general, is that duplicating this project today would be difficult if not impossible due to new restrictions on the use of eminent domain (condemnation) and tax - increment financing. Also, the City of St. Louis Park purchased 37 properties to make the project work, a feat difficult to replicate today given dwindling local - government aid funds. From a market standpoint, the residential component of this project is pushing full occupancy, while the retail has been good but less reliable. In terms of design, the developer states now that he wishes he had paid a little more attention to loading /deliveries /refuse collection, as well as more clearly separating access to residential and commercial parking. Information for 06 -03 -08 Edina City Council work session — Comp Plan Update Land Use: Mixed Use Development Kensington Park, 77th and Lyndale, Richfield (22 units per acre) Completed in 2004 -2005, Kensington Park is an approx. 5 -acre mixed project containing 95 loft -style condominiums, priced from $130,000 to $300,000 (studios to 2+ bedrooms), 30% affordable to 80% of median income, with underground parking. There are also 14 townhomes with prices around $300.000. each with a two -car garage. The residential is fully occupied. There is 27,000 sq. ft. of retail space, with surface parking behind the buildings. The retail is fully occupied. The City of Richfield acquired the properties through the use of tax increment (TIF) funds. This project has been deemed successful in the marketplace. The developer, The Cornerstone Group, has now stated that they would like to have provided more green space, and perhaps a bit more parking and maneuvering room for the surface parking that serves the retail. re re Ertrrr __ WEST E PART( -PA HOMES HO R c a apT � n -'TR ,r.,rr7 P' Information for 06 -03 -08 Edina City Council work session — Comp Plan Update Land Use: Mixed Use Development City Bella, 66th and Lyndale, Richfield (approx. 35 units per acre) Completed around 2004 by the Gramercy Corporation, City Bella contains 157 cooperative units ($150,000 to $620,000), in two buildings and 16 ownership townhomes ($250,000 to $400,000), with underground parking. The main tower is 15 stories high. There is 18,000 sq. ft. of retail space fronting onto Lyndale Avenue (restaurant, medical, and neighborhood commercial). There is a small surface parking lot behind the commercial, as well as a one -acre park/plaza, with a walkway to Woodlake Nature Center. This project has been viewed as very successful from a housing perspective. These units met a high demand for long -term Richfield residents who wanted to remain in Richfield after selling their homes. The retail has been steady, and benefits from its proximity to Woodlake Centre directly across Lyndale Avenue to the east. if t, y ; xr : r.` i 8 iF i�.r -.' -- ; IfT - - - -- S 101 i t E.[•[7 -�� ■1•i lid t Q to t�T AA t, y ; xr : r.` i 8 iF il '211 fin - -- ; IfT - - - -- S , 77 Lyndale Gateway West Area il Information for 06 -03 -08 Edina City Council work session — Comp Plan Update Land Use: Mixed Use Development Woodlake Centre, Richfield (approx. 20 units per acre) Woodlake Centre covers about 11 acres, and includes 90,000 sq. ft. of commercial space (attached to an existing bank and medical clinic), 138 townhomes and apartments (replacing 14 single - family homes that were acquired by the City), 78 units of assisted living, a central plaza/sculpture garden park, and a 650 -space parking structure. The Richfield HRA contributed about $9.5 million in tax increment (TIF) funds to help finance essential elements such as the property acquisition, the parking ramp, and the space for the new park amenity. This project was fully- occupied upon completion in 2002. It has received high marks for its highly - connected paths and landscape /park amenities. L-11 Information for 06 -03 -08 Edina City Council work session — Comp Plan Update Land Use: Mixed Use Development Village at Mendota Heights / Linden Lofts (6 units per acre) Located at Minnesota Hwy 110 and Dodd Road, the 23 -acre Village at Mendota Heights (by Town Center Development;. Dorn Cos.; Ross Fefercorn, and the Dakota County Community Development Agency) development is under construction, although two of the retail/office buildings are completed, leased up, and open for business. The $60 million project contains 36 loft condominiums, 39 row townhomes (inc. 5 live -work units), 60 units of affordable CDA senior housing, 47,000 sq. ft. of retail, and 40,000 sq. ft. of office space. The site plan features a traditional town square with a green, fountain, and park benches, and both structured and angled surface parking in front of the stores. Adjacent Linden Lofts (approx. 6 acres), by developer Ross Fefercorn, has been completed. This 36 -unit mansion -style residential development is almost sold out. This project has proven popular as a destination, for its sense of place and walkable environment. However, its location on busy Highway 110 makes it difficult to access except by car. Once on site, the site plan makes it very easy to park -once- and -walk. ' z� lJ Information for 06 -03 -08 Edina City Council work session — Comp Plan Update Land Use: Mixed Use Development Town Square, Falcon Heights (37 units per acre) Constructed on a 5 -acre site of a former failing retail strip center, Town Square features 119 rental apartments, 56 senior housing units, 14 market towmhomes. and 12,000 square of retail space with surface parking behind. The apartment and senior units have underground parking, while the townhomes each have tuck -under garages. This project is closely linked through improved access and design to Curtiss Field park to the south. Completed in 2005, this $37 million project benefited from public funding from a variety of sources including the City of Falcon Heights, MHFA, the Met Council, Family Housing Fund, and Ramsey County. The developer was Sherman Associates. Over 20 community meetings were held to achieve consensus on the need for senior and multi - family housing, and for a set of development design guidelines which emphasized transit - orientation and walkablity. Also the meetings addressed compatibility with the adjacent neighborhood. The site was rezoned to Planned Unit Development to provide the flexibility required for integrated site planning and architectural design. TTT ti � w }R � .i 7 Information for 06 -03 -08 Edina City Council work session — Comp Plan Update Land Use: Density and Height Incentives Density (and Height) IncentivesBonuses: How do they work in other jurisdictions? Density incentives, or bonuses, are part of a larger package of tools used in growth management to promote infill redevelopment that provides certain public benefits. Other tools sometimes used are fee waivers and expedited approval processes. These tools create incentives for developers to provide public amenities or goods in exchange for greater density levels than allowed under existing zoning. Generally speaking, incentive zoning can help a community to advance its physical, cultural, and social goals. In some jurisdictions, density bonuses are granted for the following array of "community benefits ": • Affordable and workforce housing • Child and elder care • Open space • Pedestrian connectivity • Barrier -free housing • Energy - efficient housing • Transit • Preservation of historic structures • Preservation of farm land • Solar protection • Space for non - profit organizations • Cultural facilities (performing and visual arts venues) • Public art Generally, the following features are found in zoning ordinances that have bonus provisions: 1. Baseline requirements are set for participation in a bonus program. 2. Existing Floor Area Ratios (FAR) are left as they are, and additional FAR is granted only as a development incentive tied to identified community goals. 3. Incentives are provided to locate parking underground. Information for 06 -03 -08 Edina City Council work session — Comp Plan Update Land Use: Density and Height Incentives 4. Exemption from FAR calculations square footage for uses that embody community values (such as daycare). Use of a highly discretionary regulatory framework, which emphasizes guidelines and incentives over hard regulations, to promote ongoing learning and innovation, and a more cooperative planning approach. Some jurisdictions that use density bonus systems are: Annapolis, MD Fairfax County, VA Vancouver, BC Canada Chapel Hill, NC Highland Park, IL Boulder, CO San Diego, CA Santa Fe, NM Denver, CO Santa Barbara, CA Aspen, CO Lincoln, NE Tompkins County, NY Pasadena, CA Madison, W1 2 Information for 06 -03 -08 Edina City Council work session — Comp Plan Update Land Use: Density Density: What does it mean? How do you measure it? Note: The draft Comprehensive Plan recommends only one instance of increasing the allowable Floor Area Ratio, namely the Cahill industrial area which is zoned Planned Industrial District, which is now permits 0.5 FAR; the Comp Plan recommends this be increased to 1.0 FAR. The Comp Plan proposes that all other areas of the city remain at the densities allowed under current zoning. The draft Comprehensive Plan proposes design guidelines be used, as part of newly- devised zoning revisions, to achieve a higher quality of design, livability, and compatibility for new developments, especially those proposed at maximum allowable densities. Density is usually viewed as a measurement of how many homes there are per acre of land in a given area. It can be an effective way of measuring how "built up" a neighborhood is or isn't. Density can let public works officials what kind of infrastructure an area needs. It can give retailers an idea of how many customers are near their stores. But, there are many things that density calculations cannot do. They cannot tell us the quality of a neighborhood. They cannot tell us how attractive it is, or how safe it is. Density figures cannot tell us the stability of property values for specific sites or adjacent areas. Density can be a controversial term. Increased density is feared by those who imagine ugly buildings, overshadowed open space, parking and traffic problems, irresponsible residents, and other negatives often attributed to housing that is other than single - family detached. On the other hand, density is promoted by those who value urbane streetscapes, more efficient infrastructure operation, walkable and connected neighborhoods, a mix of uses, and increased housing options and family types in a tighter area. Key points to consider: 1. Density and design are inter - related. Design means how the buildings relate to the street, how they relate to other buildings, and Information for 06 -03 -08 Edina City Council work session — Comp Plan Update Land Use: Density how the buildings themselves are designed aesthetically and functionally. 2. Higher densities require a more walkable public and semi - public spaces. There must be wide sidewalks, street trees and landscaped paths, and street furniture such as benches, and convenient links to transit. This allows residents, and visitors too, to move about for some of their needs without a car, cutting down the need for parking. It also contributes to overall safety by providing "eyes on the street." 3. Another feature of successful moderate and high densities is "mixed uses." This means that a neighborhood is not purely residential. Within walking distance (sometimes in the same building) there must be shops, restaurants, offices, and services. This provides convenience for the residents of dense areas by cutting down on the need to drive. 4. Density and crowding are not the same. Crowding usually refers to the number of people per room or unit. However, it is possible to live at very high density in a spacious apartment with no crowding, and conversely it is possible to live in a detached, but small house, that is crowded in terms of having many people per room. 5. Often people confuse density with building type, assuming that detached houses are lower density than attached and/or multiple - family housing types. This is generally true, but not always. A high -rise tower set on a park -like site may be lower density than a set of detached houses on small lots. 6. Perceived density is not highly related to actual density, but is profoundly affected by landscaping, aesthetics, noise, and building type. 7. Some people associate higher densities with social and economic characteristics such as renter and low - income households, and high crime neighborhoods. They may misperceive densities because of this, underestimating the densities of more affluent areas with larger numbers of owners. 2 Information for 06 -03 -08 Edina City Council work session — Comp Plan Update Land Use: Density 8. Densities can be measured by (partial list): • Parcel or block densities (units per acre) • Neighborhood (or district or precinct), which includes not only the buildings but also the spaces between the buildings, including parking areas (units per net acre, excluding non - residentially used land OR units per gross acre, including such uses as parks, schools, places of worship, roads) • Net population density per acre • Floor Area Ratio (FAR) (built area of all floors divided by the parcel area) • Building site coverage (area of ground floor footprint of building divided by the parcel area) • Impervious surface parcel coverage - Information for 06 -03 -08 Edina City Council work session — Comp Plan Update Land Use: Setbacks /Design Issues What is the rationale for reducing building setbacks? Aren't landscaped setbacks desirable? Suburban regulations often require generous building setbacks to provide for landscaping, and to separate uses from each other. This requirement arose out of several presumptions that may not always hold true today. In the 1950s, when suburban expansion increased rapidly due to the increased demand for new homes, disinvestment in transit, federally - subsidized freeway building, and the availability of inexpensive cars and gas, the predominant planning theory and practice called for separation of uses and easy, congestion -free mobility between uses. Unforeseen, or at least under - appreciated, during the last 50+ years, were the impacts of (1) the amounts and extent of incentives for new single- family homes, almost exclusively in the suburbs (mortgage interest and local property tax deductions from federal income tax, private banking interest rate preferences, redlining of inner -city neighborhoods), (2) government subsidies of roads instead of transit, and (3) the oil depletion allowance that subsidized cheap gas. These and other factors contributed, and still do, to an unsustainable growth pattern for metro areas, in terms of the financial capabilities of all levels of government to keep pace with the demand for new roads, bridges, lights, sewers, etc., and maintenance of existing infrastructure. Recently, many have begun to recognize the social and health costs of a lifestyle based on mobility by car, rather than by foot or bicycle. Obesity and other health issues have arisen from our more sedentary lifestyle. Therefore, many, if not most, jurisdictions are beginning to find ways to create a more compact development pattern, based on mixing of uses, more communal public green space (instead of each parcel providing its own "yards "), and re- designing our streets to be more friendly to all modes of travel (motor vehicle, bike, pedestrian). This new direction has led planners and policy makers to re- consider the nature of building setback requirements, with a view to moving toward clustering buildings more closely and requiring more shared green space and linkages between developments. The space between buildings is being seen not so much as a "buffer" but rather as .a "transition." AGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL JUNE 3, 2008 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk (*) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine. and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of May 20, 2008 II. PAYMENT OF CLAIMS III. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of May 20, 2008, Work Session of May 20, 2008 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings, " the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure fairness to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: • Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. • In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. A. PUBLIC HEARING ORDINANCE NO. 2008 -04 — Amending Section 850 Regarding Heights and Floor Area Ratio (First Reading: favorable vote of majority of Council Members present to approve - Waiver of Second Reading: favorable rollcall vote of four Council Members to approve) Agenda/Edina City Council June 3, 2008 Page 2 III. PUBLIC COMMENT During "Public Comment," the City Council will invite comments from those in attendance who would like to speak about something not on tonight's agenda. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes and cannot speak to an issue for which a public hearing was held by the Council within the last thirty days or a matter scheduled for a future hearing on a specific date. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments. Instead, the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. IV. AWARD OF BID (Favorable rollcall vote of majority Council Members present to approve) * A. Two Truck Boxes for Tandem Trucks — Public Works * B. Well #3 Pump House C. ENG 08 -5 Morningside Water Main Pipe Re- lining WM-481 V. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS (Favorable rollcall vote of majority Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Resolution No. 2008 -51 Accepting Various Donations (Favorable rollcall vote of four Council Members to approve) B. Board of Appeal And Equalization Report C. Bike Edina Task Force Presentation — Interlachen Bike Lane /Sidewalk * D. Set Hearing Date For Planning Items (06/17/08): 1. Revised Final Development Plan, Revised Conditional Use Permit, Lot Division, 3101 & 3201 691h Street West, DJR Architects /Tom Miller 2. Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning Approval, 4010 West 65th Street, Crosstown Medical LLC * E. Resolution No. 2008 -52 Setting Public Hearing Date (07- 01 -08) for Improvement No. BA -345 Woodland Circle and Lane and Improvement No. BA -352 Woodend Drive * F. Change Order Well No. 3 * G. Resolution No. 2008 -53 Approving Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program In FY 2009 — 2011 VI. FINANCE (Favorable rollcall vote of majority Council Members present to approve) A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated May 22, 2008 TOTAL $812,911.75; and May 29, 2008 TOTAL $442,486.16 VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS VIII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS Tues Tues Mon Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Fri Tues Tues Tues Mon Tues Tues Tues Mon Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Tues Agenda /Edina City Council June 3, 2008 Page 3 IX. MANAGER'S COMMENTS X. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952 - 927 -8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. June 3 June 3 June 16 June 17 June 17 June 24 July 1 July 1 July 4 July 15 July 15 July 22 Aug 4 Aug 19 Aug 26 Aug 26 Sept 1 Sept 2 Sept 9 Sept 9 Sept 16 Sept 23 Oct 7 Oct 21 SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Work Session — Comp Plan 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Joint Meeting With Edina School Board 5:00 P.M. RM 349 COMMUNITY CENTER Work Session — Comp Plan /Budget Assumptions 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS Study Session — To be determined 11:30A.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Work Session — Comp Plan 5:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COUNCIL CHAMBERS INDEPENDENCE DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Work Session — Comp Plan 5:00 P.M. Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Study Session — To be determined 7:00 A.M. Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Study Session — To be determined 11:30 A.M. Filing Opens — Edina City Council Affidavits of Candidacy LABOR DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. PRIMARY ELECTION DAY — POLLS OPEN 7:00 A.M. UNTIL 8:00 P.M. Filing Closes — Edina City Council Affidavits of Candidacy Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Study Session — To be determined 7:OOA.M. Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM CITY CLERKS OFFICE COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MAY 20, 2008 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Chair Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Housh and seconded by Commissioner Swenson approving the Consent Agenda for the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY May 6, 2008, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Housh and seconded by Commissioner Swenson, approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority from May 6, 2008. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, the Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:05 p.m. Executive Director MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MAY 20, 2008 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Chair Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Housh and seconded by Commissioner Swenson approving the Consent Agenda for the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority as presented. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY May 6. 2008, APPROVED Motion made by Commissioner Housh and seconded by Commissioner Swenson approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority from May 6, 2008. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, the Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:05 p.m. Executive Director MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MAY 20, 2008 5:00 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:10 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were: Members Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff present included: Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager; Ceil Smith, Assistant to the City Manager; Cary Teague, Planning Director; Dan Cornejo, Planning Consultant; and Jane Timm, Deputy City Clerk. Mayor Hovland said the purpose of the work session was to discuss the Comprehensive Plan. The Council discussed the plan of action to review the Comprehensive Plan. Consensus was to start with land use at the meeting on June 3, 2008, at 5:00 p.m. Topics of discussion would include: • Height • Density • Setbacks /design issues - -i.e. closeness to street, parking • Small Area Plans • Height and density incentives, and how they work in other jurisdictions • Basis for legal change in zoning incentives • How mixed use works in the Twin Cities market, especially with housing over commercial? The discussion at the work session on June 17, 2008, 5 p.m., would be housing. The topics would include: • Housing type methodology • Ownership vs. Rental • Accessory dwelling units - -would they work in any area in Edina, or be confined to certain areas • Mandatory Inclusionary Zoning • Methodology /philosophy of 500 additional affordable units • Location of Affordable Housing • Use of the phrase "Over Housing" • "Accessibility" issues • Implementation chapter inconsistencies The discussion at the work session on July 1, 2008, at 5:00 p.m., would be Assumptions. The discussion at the work session on July 15, 2008, at 5:00 p.m., would be Transportation. The topics would include: • "Access" issues • Functional Classification as a basis for traffic and vehicle count data The Council discussed the joint work session with the School Board on June 16, 2008. City Manager Hughes informed the City Council that one meeting would be needed to discuss the budget. The Council discussed and made a decision to change the May 27, 2008, work session to 12:30 p.m. The purpose of that work session would be the Public Works facility. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at approximately 6:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Jane M. Timm, Deputy City Clerk MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL MAY 20, 2008 5:00 P.M. Mayor Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:10 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were: Members Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. Staff present included: Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager; Ceil Smith, Assistant to the City Manager; Cary Teague, Planning Director; Dan Cornejo, Planning Consultant; and Jane Timm, Deputy City Clerk. Mayor Hovland said the purpose of the work session was to discuss the Comprehensive Plan. The Council discussed the plan of action to review the Comprehensive Plan. Consensus was to start with land use at the meeting on June 3, 2008, at 5:00 p.m. Topics of discussion would include: • Height • Density • Setbacks /design issues --i.e. closeness to street, parking • Small Area Plans • Height and density incentives, and how they work in other jurisdictions • Basis for legal change in zoning incentives • How mixed use works in the Twin Cities market, especially with housing over commercial? The discussion at the work session on June 17, 2008, 5 p.m., would be housing. The topics would include: • Housing type methodology • Ownership vs. Rental • Accessory dwelling units - -would they work in any area in Edina, or be confined to certain areas • Mandatory Inclusionary Zoning • Methodology /philosophy of 500 additional affordable units • Location of Affordable Housing • Use of the phrase "Over Housing" • "Accessibility" issues • Implementation chapter inconsistencies The discussion at the work session on July 1, 2008, at 5:00 p.m., would be Assumptions. The discussion at the work session on July 15, 2008, at 5:00 p.m., would be Transportation. The topics would include: • "Access" issues • Functional Classification as a basis for traffic and vehicle count data The Council discussed the joint work session with the School Board on June 16, 2008. City Manager Hughes informed the City Council that one meeting would be needed to discuss the budget. The Council discussed and made a decision to change the May 27, 2008, work session to 12:30 p.m. The purpose of that work session would be the Public Works facility. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at approximately 6:45 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Jane M. Timm, Deputy City Clerk MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL May 20, 2008 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson approving the Council Consent Agenda as presented with the exception of Item V.C. Traffic Safety Report of May 7, 2008. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 6. 2008, AND WORK SESSION OF MAY 6. 7008, APPROVED Motion made by Member Housh seconded by Member Swenson approving the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of May 6, 2008, and Work Session of May 6, 2008. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. MAY 24, 2008, PROCLAIMED ABIGAIL TAYLOR REMEMBRANCE DAY Mayor Hovland proclaimed May 24, 2008, as Abigail Taylor Remembrance Day. Member Masica made a motion proclaiming May 24, 2008, as Abigail Taylor Remembrance Day. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES WEEK — MAY 18 -24, 2008 Mayor Hovland declared the week of May 20 -26, 2008, as Emergency Medical Services (EMS) week in Edina to honor the Edina Fire and Police Departments' valuable contributions to the health and well -being of our citizens. Member Housh made a motion proclaiming May 18 -24, 2008, as Emergency Medical Services week in Edina. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. 2008 HERITAGE AWARD Associate Planner Repya along with the Mayor and City Council presented the 2008 Edina Heritage Award to Edina Morningside Community Church located at 4201 Morningside Road. After a short presentation and history from Chris Rofidal, Heritage Preservation Board member, Reverend Rosemary R96haRocha accepted the award with gratitude on behalf of the entire congregation. RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -48 ADOPTED ORDERING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT S -048 — WEST FRONTAGE ROAD SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION, BENTON AVENUE TO EDEN AVENUE Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Engineer Presentation Assistant Engineer Sullivan reviewed the proposed project using PowerPoint. He noted the project was initiated by the staff and would involve constructing a boulevard style bituminous sidewalk along the west side of the West Frontage Road from Benton Avenue to Eden Avenue. The West Frontage Road sidewalk project would be part of the City's Capital Improvement Program to create a pedestrian connection along the west side of Highway 100. The improvements would consist of a six -foot wide boulevard -style concrete walk with five -foot wide grassy boulevard. He explained that the project would be funded by the City and no special Minutes /Edina Citv Council /Mav 20. 2008 assessments would be needed. Mr. Sullivan stated staff was recommending this project as necessary, cost effective, and feasible. He said it would create a safe pedestrian link along the West Frontage Road and would connect a land- locked neighborhood to two pedestrian overpasses, the Community Center /Schools and a church. The Council questioned: the Chia Wall's materials, asked for clarification of whether the sidewalk would be bituminous or concrete, and the proposed assessment method. Mr. Sullivan explained the Chia Wall would be made of plastic interlocking grids, the sidewalk would be bituminous and there would be no special assessments for the project. Public Comment Brenda Liddle, 4808 Valley View Road, indicated she was in support of the project. Karen Lydon, 5005 West 56th Street, said she was a regular walker and agreed with the plan, but wanted to know how the sidewalk would affect the berms and sound barriers. Mayor Hovland explained her questions would be addressed after public comment. David Dickey, 5021 Yvonne Terrace, thanked the Council for the opportunity to have the sidewalk. Tom Wurst, 5025 West 56th Street, spoke in support of the sidewalk. Chris Rofidal, 5037 West 56th Street, spoke in support of the sidewalk and said it would give safe passage to residents. He thanked Mr. Sullivan and staff for the great communication regarding the project. Member Swenson made a motion seconded by Member Masica to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Mr. Sullivan answered the questions of resident, Karen Lydon, noting staff was aware of the noise and visual berms. He said that if a berm existed in a yard now there will continue to be a berm. The berm may be in a slightly different place. Staff would work with the Park Department to add low maintenance grasses and sod as needed. Member Masica made a motion to adopt Resolution No. 2008 -048 receiving the Feasibility Report, ordering Improvement S -048, authorizing plans and specification to be completed and bids taken. Member Swenson seconded the motion. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -50 ADOPTED ORDERING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT S -100A HALIFAX AVENUE SIDEWALK WEST SIDE, 54 T11 STREET TO 51 5T STREET Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Engineer Presentation Mr. Sullivan explained that in November of 2007, residents petitioned the City to install sidewalk on the west side of Halifax Avenue between West 51St Street and West 54th Street. He reminded the Council they had ordered a sidewalk be installed on the east side of Halifax Avenue in September of 2007. Mr. Sullivan reported that on May 13, 2008, following the informational meeting, a petition had been received, signed by sixteen affected residents requesting the west side sidewalk not be constructed. He added that on Tuesday just prior to the Council's meeting, another petition had been received with 25 resident signatures, some of whom had also signed the May 13th petition. For this reason, Mr. Sullivan said the Engineering Department recommended that the project not be ordered. 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /May 20, 2008 The Council questioned the City's policy for private sidewalks, and the two different estimated costs. Mr. Sullivan stated the city did not have a formal private sidewalk policy, but to avoid patchwork sidewalks would consider projects only when proposed in sufficient length to connect two portions of a street. He explained there had two different estimates because before the informational meeting he had fewer details, than when the public hearing notice and feasibility report had been developed. Public Comment John Crist, 5324 Halifax Avenue, spoke in favor of the sidewalk and expressed concern with preserving trees, safety and deterring speeding vehicles. Wayne Wenger, 5212 Halifax Avenue, spoke in opposition of the sidewalk because it could harm the Spruce trees in his yard. He supported speed bumps to slow down traffic. Marie Pechman, 5316 Halifax Avenue, spoke in favor of the sidewalk and believed trees could survive. She noted the success on Maple Road. She asked that both sides be done at the same time. Michael Dumond, 5032 Halifax Avenue, opposed sidewalks on both sides but especially the west side because the setback from home to street was minimal. He also did not want to cover more earth with cement. He asked the Council to address the issue of speed on the street. Cary Schilling, 5036 Halifax Avenue, talked about using the crosswalk on Halifax and 51St Street. He also talked about Dave Maetzold's beautifully decorated tree and the fear it would be harmed with the installation of a sidewalk. David Maetzold, 5114 Halifax Avenue, spoke in opposition of the sidewalk. He spoke specifically about the 5100 block of Halifax. He addressed the short setback on the west side of Halifax and was worried about the health of his trees. John Meenan, 5300 Halifax Avenue, did not want his large tree disturbed. He asked that the east sidewalk be completed and to follow the Planning Commission recommendation to revisit the west sidewalk after three to five years. Jill Mithun, 5308 Halifax Avenue, spoke in opposition of the sidewalk. Her concern was the harm to the trees. She also noted sidewalks add a heat factor and do not guarantee safety. Catherine Crist, 5324 Halifax Avenue, supported the sidewalk. She thought sidewalks were safer and children would benefit from them. She spoke about the speed of cars on the street. Don Curtis, Jr, 5209 Halifax Avenue, did not understand why both sides were not considered in the first place. If the issue was safety, sidewalks would be needed on both sides of the street. He concluded that there was a serious issue with speed on the street. Teresa Forliti, 5336 Halifax Avenue, opposed a sidewalk on the west side of Halifax and thought it would change the landscape drastically. She has lived on the street since 1959 and has never seen an accident on the street. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /May 20, 2008 The Council discussed with staff the impact of trees placed near the right -of -way, whether the west side was more problematic for sidewalk installation, what had been the impact of tree loss on Maple Road, and why was there such a significant difference in age of the trees on Maple Road. Mr. Sullivan said he could not guarantee preventing tree loss on Halifax Avenue but Engineering would work to save all trees. Sidewalk installation on the west side was more problematic, but was still feasible. He said he was not familiar with the Maple Road project but was aware there had been some trees replanted. Mr. Sullivan informed the Council that Halifax Avenue neighbors had submitted Neighborhood Transportation Management Plan Petition that would be brought to the Transportation Commission during the summer and if deemed feasible would be implemented sometime during the fall of 2008. He said Halifax Avenue was not slated for reconstruction until 2012 or 2013. Mr. Sullivan requested that when the east side Halifax Avenue sidewalk construction started the link from 52nd Street and Halifax Avenue to 52nd Street and Gorgas Avenue be completed. Council asked whether the necessary public notice had been given to which staff replied, the notice had been mailed as part of the current hearing. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to adopt Resolution No. 2008 -50 ordering Improvement No. S -100A, Sidewalk Construction on the west side of Halifax avenue from 51St Street to 54th Street and along the south side of 52nd Street from Halifax Avenue to Gorgas Avenue excluding construction of sidewalk along the west side of Halifax Avenue from 54th Street to 51St Street. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -51 IMPROVEMENT PROJECT B -103 WOODLAND ROAD STREET RECONSTRUCTION WOODDALE AVENUE TO WOODCREST DRIVE Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Engineering Presentation Mr. Sullivan explained in November of 2006, residents petitioned requesting curb and gutter construction on Woodland Road between Wooddale Avenue to Woodcrest Drive. After analysis, staff determined that it would be more feasible to do a neighborhood reconstruction. The proposed project would have involved reconstruction of the existing roadway, included concrete curb and gutters, improvement to the water main, and sanitary and storm sewer systems. On May 12, 2008, a petition was received requesting the project not be completed. He said for that reason staff recommended the project not be approved, but rather be placed in the city's overall pavement management program. Public Comment Bob Rydell, 19 Woodland Road, opposed the project. He wanted to see improved maintenance along the street. Tom Halverson, 21 Woodland Road, attended the open house. He understood that in order to have the road fixed one must make a request and then pay for any repairs. He wanted the City to review the policy. Lynn Truesdell, 9 Woodland Road, opposed the project as proposed. Kim Glenna, 26 Woodland Road, presented pictures. She stated something needed to be done with the road. She complained about the water in her yard and hoped it would be addressed before 15 years. 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /May 20, 2008 Robert Christianson, 23 Woodland Road, said he has significant damage to the street in front of his house, and the road needed to be repaired now. William Cavanagh, 24 Woodland Road, spoke about the water issues in front of his house and Mr. Christianson's house which in his opinion has caused deterioration of the roadway. Mark Murray, 8 Woodland Road, spoke about the initial petition and the severe water problem. He stated he did not understand why he would be assessed for the project, but noted the terrible condition of the road. Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland . Motion carried. The Council questioned the water issues in the neighborhood, the condition of the street, and the life expectancy of the street. Mr. Sullivan stated the life expectancy of the street was estimated to be two to five years. He said staff would initiate the project in the future, as part of the pavement management plan. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, to accept the Engineering Department's recommendation to not order the Woodland Road Neighborhood Improvement B -103. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. CONSIDERATION OF A VIOLATION TO THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CUP) CALVIN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL AT 4015 INGLEWOOD AVENUE Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Planner Presentation Planner Teague explained the construction of the School was based upon building plans that were slightly different from the schematics and renderings used twhen the City Council approved the CUP in August of 2007. He displayed graphic renderings the Council approved and explained the differences to the construction plans on which staff signed off in December of 2007. Mr. Teague noted specifically, the addition under construction was being built to a height of 16 feet rather than the 12 foot height approved by the City Council. The mechanical room on top of the addition was being built to a height of 25 feet nine inches rather than the 20 feet approved by the Council, and clerestory windows between the top of the mechanical room and the roof of the new lobby were eliminated. The mechanical room would now match the height of the new lobby. Mr. Teague stated the Council had been made aware of a complaint at their May 6, 2008 meeting. Public Comment Tent' Lubben, 11163 Pheasant Lane North, Maple Grove, Minnesota, Calvin Christian School Board President, read a statement along outlining Calvin Christian School expansion project from its inception to present date. He noted the seven factors the City considered in granting the CUP and stated in his opinion the school was in compliance with them. Mr. Lubben said he believed there was no reasonable basis for the City to reject the CUP. Mr. Lubben asked the City to allow the school to continue building with the final construction plans as approved. , Mark Douma, 4728 Beard Avenue, resident and engineer, stated nothing was changed that was not required by Building Code. He said he felt allegations had been made which came close to questioning the technical competence and ethical practices of the professional staff involved in the project. He added the school had no plan to be deceitful. Minutes /Edina Citv Council /Mav 20. 2008 Steve Groen, 5736 Drew Avenue South, Superintendent of Calvin Christian School, described the background of the school within the community, the needed expansion to the school, and the fundraising that had been done. He stated a negative Council decision would put families in a dilemma about where their children would be educated in the fall. He asked the City Council to allow building to continue according to the documents that were approved and signed by the City, December 17, 2008. Ed Kodet, 15 Groveland Terrace, Minneapolis, with Kodet Architectural Group, used graphic to explain the changes to the expansion between the CUP approval and the actual construction. Mr. Kodet said the School, had endeavored to stay within the conditions of the CUP. He said the City asked for landscaping changes, and the School complied with the request. Mr. Kodet asked the City Council be fair, noted the value the landscaping brought to the project, and again said, in his opinion, the school had met the CUP conditions. Guy Charles, 4224 West 42nd Street, stated he felt the Planning staff had repeatedly noted the changes to the School's plans were slight and typical of changes seen between the renderings use for approval and final construction drawings. Mr. Charles said he saw no reason to stop the project. Christine Weiss, 5517 Highwood Drive, a parent of two children at the school, talked about the aesthetics of the school. She said she believed Kodet Architects had done an exceptional job updating the school and property. Paula Sweet, 4903 Bruce Avenue, stated she believed the school had followed all the rules and she was alarmed a couple of people could create this turmoil. She also stated students would be in jeopardy of starting school in the fall if the project were stopped. Collette Prohofsky, 4821 Rutledge Avenue, stated that Calvin Christian was a great neighbor. Brad Beard, 6516 Waterman Avenue, stated planning staff had told him typically when a project was completed the original renderings differed from the final plans. Mr. Beard praised the City of Edina staff on their thoroughness. Mr. Beard encouraged the City Council to allow the project to move forward. Kitty O'Dea, 4610 Bruce Avenue, talked about the process being broken and noted that what might be viewed as a small change by one person could be considered huge by another person. Eric Greene, 4505 Claremore Court , was concerned about how one City Council member and one neighbor could team up against the school. Karen Christensson, 4208 Alden Drive, a neighbor and Calvin Christian's Library Media Specialist, asked the City Council to support the project as approved. Eddy Christensson, 4208 Alden Drive, noted that Calvin Christian had been an exemplary neighbor. He stressed that all persons involved needed to come together as a community. Paul Norrell, a Wayzata resident and parent of students at Calvin Christian School spoke about the great school. Jennifer Janovy, 4016 Inglewood Avenue, opposed the mass of the structure. She explained that she supported the project until she noticed all the changes. As far as she was concerned the contract between the City and Calvin Christian School had been broken. Lisa Egger, 4006 Grimes Avenue, supported the project. She was very happy with the plan and wanted her child to be in the school in September. 11 Minutes /Edina City Council /May 20, 2008 Brad Kettersmith, 3400 Garfield Avenue South, Minneapolis, parent of student attending the school, requested approval of the completion of the project. Ike Vansomeren, 5141 Tifton Drive, past president of Calvin Christian School, expressed his desire for the continuation of excellent work done by the School, Council, School Board and staff. Dinah Miederloh, Crystal Minnesota, a Calvin Christian School Teacher, explained the benefits the completed project would have on the students. Videhi Larson, 6616 Ridgeview Drive, parent of a student at the school, expressed her love of the school and reiterated the plan had been approved by the City. Bea Lemmer, 5916 Sun Road, a parent of a student at the school, explained that the school leadership would not deceive neighbors or City Council. Mayor Hovland made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. The City Council discussed the process, the appropriateness of the design in a residential neighborhood, whether any compromises could be made to the plan, the fact that the plan had been approved by the City, and if reduction of the mass was possible. Member Bennett made a motion that Calvin Christian School be found in violation of the Conditional Use Permit, but no STOP work order be issued and that the architect and school's governing body work with the City to mediate the impact of the mass on the residential neighborhood and recommended the elimination of the separate construction over the library which could be replaced with unobtrusive skylights. Motion failed for lack of a second. No formal action taken. PUBLIC COMMENT No one appeared to offer comment. *AWARD OF BID POLICE DEPARTMENT — ONE OUTDOOR WARNING SIREN REPLACEMENT, PAMELA PARK Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson awarding the bid for one outdoor warning siren to the recommended low bidder, Ready Watt Electric, at $18,223.09. Motion carried on roll call vote — five ayes *AWARD OF BID ODOR CONTROL MEDIA REPLACEMENT SANITARY SEWER LIFT STATION #6, CONTRACT PW 08 -2, IMP. NO. LS -39 Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson awarding the bid for Odor Control Media Replacement Sanitary Sewer Lift Station #6, Contract PW 08 -2, Imp. No. LS 39 to the recommended low bidder, Calgon Carbon Corporation, at $31,800.00. Motion carried on roll call vote — five ayes *AWARD OF BID SOFTBALL FIELD FENCING — PAMELA PARK Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson awarding the bid for softball field fencing at Pamela Park to the recommended low bidder, Town and Country Fence, at $31,100.00. Motion carried on roll call vote — five ayes *AWARD OF BID PATHWAY RENOVATION — LEWIS PARK Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson awarding the bid for pathway renovation at Lewis Park to the recommended low bidder, Bituminous Roadways, at $24,745.00. 7 Minutes /Edina Citv Council /Mav 20. 2008 Motion carried on roll call vote — five ayes RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -38 APPROVED ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statute all donations to the City must be adopted by Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Swenson introduced Resolution No. 2008 -47 accepting various donations. Member Masica seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *CORRECTION OF DECEMBER 4, 2007, CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING MINUTES Member Housh made a motion and seconded by Member Swenson to approve the correction of December 4, 2007, City Council Regular Meeting Minutes. Motion carried on roll call vote — five ayes TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REPORT OF MAY 7. 2008, APPROVED Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Masica approving the Traffic Safety Staff Review Report for May 7, 2008. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Housh and seconded by Member Swenson approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated May 8, 2008, and consisting of 26 pages; General Fund $101,747.85; Communications Fund $10,944.42; Working Capital Fund $19,867.18; Art Center Fund $2,249.07; Golf Dome Fund $2,717.91; Aquatic Center Fund $4,432.99; Golf Course Fund $13,479.09; Ice Arena Fund $18,419.82; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $6,309.25; Liquor Fund $132,467.48; Utility Fund $20,679.86; Storm Sewer Fund $2,383.00; PSTF Agency Fund $6,380.68; TOTAL $342,078.60 and for approval of payment of claims dated May 15, 2008, and consisting of 31 pages: General Fund $106,500.55; Communications Fund $4,044.30; Working Capital Fund $28,935.45; Art Center Fund $1,669.00; Golf Dome Fund $47.96; Aquatic Center Fund; $3,061.74; Golf Course Fund $72,677.48; Ice Arena Fund $31,431.29; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $91,990.03; Liquor Fund $310,281.05; Utility Fund $406,138.51; Storm Sewer $7,226.51; Recycling Fund $35,380.00; PSTF Agency Fund $4,993.42; TOTAL $1,104,377.29 Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 11:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, [3 Jane M Timm, Deputy City Clerk • S q REPORT/RECOMMENDATION t To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item II.A Consent ❑ From: Cary Teague Planning Director Information Only �. Date: June 3, 2008 Mgr. Recommends F] To HRA Subject: An ordinance amendment ® To Council regarding floor area ratio and building height in the R -1 and Action ® Motion R -2 zoning districts. ❑ Resolution Deadline for a city decision: No deadline ® Ordinance Discussion Brief Description The City Council asked the Planning Commission to consider an ordinance amendment regarding a maximum floor area ratio and building height to the ridge line for single - family homes. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed ordinance at their March and April meetings. (See minutes on pages A42 —A49, and the proposed ordinance on pages Al —Ala.) Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission unanimously recommended denial of the floor area ratio requirement, and approval of the maximum requirement to the ridge line. The Commission further requested that the Council authorize them to study the use of FAR in a vicinity manner. The Commission believes that FAR should either be tied to a vicinity or neighborhood character districts as laid out in the Comprehensive Plan; or separate districts should be established and designated. (See pages Alb —Alc.) Concluding, the Commission believes that the recommended Code change regarding building height and other recent Code changes will help control massing until separate neighborhoods are defined and/or rezoned. (See pages A48 —A49 of the Planning Commission minutes.) Staff Recommended Action Approve the attached zoning ordinance amendment. Introduction/Background As part of the continuing consideration of the issue of large homes being built in fully developed neighborhoods, staff drafted an ordinance to further regulate single - family homes by establishing a minim mum floor area ration (FAR) requirement and establish a maximum height to the ridge line of a home. Staff also hired the Collaborative Design Group to build a three dimensional computer model of r 4 three existing neighborhoods to show the impact that the ordinance would have. The specific homes selected were recently torn down and rebuilt. They are: 5617 Chowen; 5308 Oaklawn; and 5504 Halifax. (See these three homes on pages A8 —A18.) The Collaborative Design Group presented the model to the City and Planning Commission. Existing City Code Tools As you recall, the current zoning ordinance does have some good tools that already address the massing issue. The City's 25 -30% building coverage requirement, and increased setback of 6 inches for every foot over 15 feet in height, does limit building size. Also, the City's median lot width and size requirement keep new subdivisions in areas with lots that are larger than 9,000 square feet and wider than 75 feet, consistent with the existing neighborhoods. Additionally, recent amendments work to further reduce building size; those amendments include: For additions, alterations and changes to or rebuilds of existing single - family dwellings and buildings containing two dwellings. The first floor elevation may not be more than one foot above the existing first floor elevation. If a split level dwelling is torn down and a new home is built, the new first floor or entry level elevation may not be more than one foot above the front entry elevation of the home that was torn down. Side yard setback. A sliding scale of setback requirements based on lot width was established. This will slightly increase the separation between houses on lots that are between 61 -75 feet in width. Exceptions. Bay windows were eliminated as a setback exception. This combats the issue of allowing three feet of building into the setback if the wall is brought in at ground level. Building Height. Building height is now measured from existing grade, rather than proposed grade. The effect of these recent amendments is somewhat unknown. However, staff can say that the ordinance amendments have caused some homes to be redesigned to be smaller than originally planned, as the original home was designed based on the old ordinances. As a reference, staff has attached the previous survey of cities to compare how other communities regulate single - family homes to address the massing issue. (See pages Ald —A7a.) This survey suggests that Edina's regulations are among the most restrictive in the metro area. Potential Ordinance Amendment Despite our current regulations, there is still a concern that Edina's ordinance does not go far enough to restrict the size of new homes. Two amendments are suggested to further restrict size. First is a provision that Edina currently does not use for regulating single - family homes, which is floor area ratio (FAR). The second is a height limitation to the ridge line of a home. 1. Floor area ratio Floor area ratio (FAR) may be the most direct tool for dealing with this issue, since it regulates house mass based on lot size. FAR's are defined in the zoning code as "the gross floor area divided by the lot area." The use of FAR for single - family dwellings is rare. Minneapolis is the only surveyed city with such a requirement. Establishing a uniform FAR across the City is difficult due to the large variation of lot sizes, including a wide variety of lot sizes within very close proximity of one another. See the Halifax neighborhood on page Al 1. The varying lot size is due primarily to lot depth. The depth of lots can vary from 100 feet to 250+ feet. The City of Minneapolis recently instituted an FAR requirement of .5, however, lot sizes in Minneapolis are generally uniform; they do not have the varying lot depths and lot widths that Edina has. (See Edina/Minneapolis code comparison on page A7a.) In an effort to create a uniform FAR, staff suggests consideration of a sliding scale FAR based on lot width, and for FAR calculation purposes only, calculate the depth to a maximum of 150 feet. This would bring homes into more of a uniform size in neighborhoods with varying lot widths and depths. The following is the sliding scale FAR for consideration: Lot 1'4 idth FAR 50' and below .50 51 ' 53' _49 54' - 56' .48 57' 59' .47 60' - 61' .46 62' - 64' .45 65' - 67' .44 68' 69' .43 70' - 71 ' .42 72' 74' .41 75' and above .40 Staff suggests that the FAR would include only finished floor area space above the basement and would include garage space. Impact on existing homes To determine the impact that this type of ordinance would have, staff first ran the calculations for the three homes modeled by the Collaborative Design Group. 5308 Oaklawn Avenue. Based on the above FAR requirement, the home on Oaklawn would have to be reduced by 391 square feet, which is essentially the size of the garage. The square footage of the home and garage is 4,163 square feet. The home and garage would be limited to 3,772 square feet based on the proposed FAR. (See pages A8 —A9.) 5404 Halifax Lane. Based on the above FAR requirement, the home on Halifax would have to be reduced by 440 square feet. This is because the lot is 190 feet deep. Therefore, the back 40 feet would not be included for FAR purposes. Please note that the recent zoning ordinance amendments regarding measuring building height and side yard setbacks would also require that the home be reduced 5 feet in height and reduce the setbacks by 1.5 feet on each side. (See pages A10 —A14.) 5617 Chowen Avenue. The above FAR requirement would not impact this lot. However, the new side yard setback requirements based on lot width would have required this home to increase the side yard setback by 6 inches on each side. (See pages Al5 —A18.) Again, the Collaborative Design Group will show the Planning Commission what these homes would look like as a result of the existing and suggested zoning ordinance amendments. f' Staff has also run examples of what the impact would be on other homes within the City that have been recently torn down and rebuilt: 5908 Code. This home would have to be reduced by 574 square feet based on the proposed FAR requirement. This lot is 104 x 307 feet or 31,928 square feet in size. Based on the above, the FAR calculation would be based on a 104 x 150 or 15,600 square foot lot. An FAR of .40 would be required, therefore a 6,240 square foot home, including garage, could be built. A 6,814 square foot home, including the garage, was built. The garage is 875 square feet. (See pages A19 —A22.) The new ordinance on how height is measured would also require this home to be reduced by 4.8 feet. 7000 Antrim. There would be no changes required to this home. This lot is 245 x 248 feet or 60,760. A home as large as 14,700 square feet could be built on this site using a .40 FAR based on a 245 x 150 foot lot. This home is 40.7 feet to the ridge line of the home, and 30 feet to the mid -point of the roof. (See pages A23 —A26.) 4005 Grimes. This home would have to be reduced by 249 square feet based on the proposed FAR. (See pages A27 —A29.) Under the new side yard setback rules, this home would have to increase its side yard setbacks 1.8 -2.7 feet. 4212 Crocker. There would be no changes required to this home, despite the 200 foot lot depth. (See pages A30 —A31.) 4601 Drexel. This home would have to be reduced by 767 square feet based on the proposed FAR, which based on the 60 -foot wide lot; an FAR of .46 would be required. The garage in this home is 671 square feet. (See pages A32 —A34.) 4608 Bruce. This home would have to be reduced by 274 square feet based on the proposed FAR, which based on the 50 foot wide lot; an FAR of .50 would be required. (See pages A35 —A36.) 4505 Wooddale. This home would have to be reduced by 710 square feet based on the proposed FAR. The calculation is based on the 71 foot wide lot, which would require an FAR of .42. The lot is 71 x 179 in size. Only the front 150 x 71 is used for the FAR calculation. (See pages A37 —A38.) Country Club — West Side. Staff randomly selected an area of the west side of the Country Club District between Browndale and Wooddale along Bridge Street. (See page A39.) Please note that the FAR shown does not include attached garages. Of the 63 homes included, roughly 19 would become nonconforming under the suggested ordinance. Country Club — East Side. Staff randomly selected an area of the east side of the Country Club District between Casco and Arden along Bridge Street. (See page A40.) Of the 104 homes included, roughly 8 would become nonconforming under the suggested ordinance. The Country Club District includes some of Edina's smallest lots, with some of its larger homes. Parkwood Knolls - Vacant Lots. Edina's last vacant lot subdivisions would not be significantly impacted by the proposed ordinance. The last addition of Parkwood Knolls has lots that exceed 100 feet in width. The finished square footage of new homes in this area could be between 6,900 — ,13,200 square feet, under the suggested FAR requirement. (See page A41.) Additional Considerations • Certain areas could be excluded for FAR purposes such as detached garages, porches, etc 4 • Dwellings being remodeled or added on to could be allowed a nominal increase in FAR (such as 10 %) even if they are at the maximum FAR. 2. Building Height — Ridge Line or Top of a Roof A continued complaint about new homes being built is the overall height of a home. The Council recommended establishing a maximum height to the ridge line or top of a home, similar to the City of Bloomington, which allows a maximum of 40 feet. Based on direction from the City Council, staff recommends consideration of a 35 -40 foot maximum from the front of a home depending on lot size. This would likely prevent the latest trend of homes being built with a steep roof pitch, such at the home at 5504 Halifax, which from the top of the roof to the eave measures 20 feet. The total height to the top is 40 feet. (See page A13.) A 35 -foot requirement would require a 5 -foot reduction to the ridge line. The idea behind the sliding scale based on lot size, is that it would allow taller homes on lots that are larger, which would mean greater separation from adjacent homes. The following maximum height is recommended: The maximum height to the highest point on a roof of a single or double dwelling unit shall be 35 feet. "rhe maximum height may increased by one inch for each foot that the lot exceeds 75 feet in width. In no event shall the maximum height exceed 40 feet. Under this type of regulation, any lot larger than 135 feet in width would be allowed a house with the maximum height to the top of the roof to be 40 feet. z � ORDINANCE NO. 2008-04 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING -THE CITY CODE CONCERNING FLOOR AREA RATIO AND BUILDING HEIGHT IN THE R -1, SINGLE- DWELLING UNIT DISTRICT THE CITY OF EDINA ORDAINS: Section 1. Sub Section 850.11, Subdivision 5 is hereby amended to add the following: Subd.5. Requirements for Lot Areas and Dimensions. E. Floor area ratio (FAR) requirements.; Lot Width Maximum FAR. 60' and below, ;.50, 51'- 53' 49 $4'- 56; _48 57'- 597 _47 X1.46 50'- 61; 62'- 64' ,.45 65'- 67' !.44 68'- 69' ; 43 70'- 71' _42 72'- 74' 41 75' and above j.40 1. For calculating FAR - above, only the front 150 feet of lot depth shall, be used. - - - -- 2. The FAR s_ all include only finished floor area above the basement Land includes garage space., 3. When determining the lot width above, the lot width should be pounded to the nearest foot! 4. If an existing dwelling exceeds the required FAR, it shall be allowed a one time addition of no more than 10% of the existing square; footage of the structure, assuming the addition meets all other` zoning ordinance standards.: Section 2. Sub Section 850.11, Subdivision 6, is hereby amended to add the following: C. Height 4. The maximum height to the highest point on a roof of a M single or double dwelling unit shall be 35 feet. The maximum height may be increased by one inch for each foot that the lot exceeds 75 feet in width. In no event shall the maximum height exceed 40 feet.' Section 3. Effective Date.: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect after it adoption and publication according to law. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: Attest Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James Hovland, Mayor I f f i ...for living, learning, raising families & doing business''' 2008 Comprehensive Plan Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 - Working Draft 02 -29 -08 Z S a -` IndustriaUDffice _ Mxed Use C—dor - Dp.n space Neiphbmhnd C pv— I Node i Masd Uss Card., City of Edina 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Figure 4.2 Character Districts 0 0 5 Miles Edina Comp Plan Update 2008 Chapter 4: Land Use and Community Design (Working Draft 02- 29 -08) 4 -18 A Neighborhood Designations 8 9 IO Legend 1) Ililldale 8) Prospect Hills 16) South Harriet Park 2) Highlands 9) Dewey Hills 17) Brucewood 3) Rolling Greets 10) Brookriew Heights 18) Brookside Heights 4) Nest Alinneapolis Heights 11) Cornelia 19) Sun►r1:slope 5) Par",00d Knolls 12) Edinborough 20) Country Club District 6) I Fking Hills 13) Centennial Lakes 21) White Oaks 7) Indian Hills 14) Corridor 22) Aforningside 1 S) Colonial Grove Survey ®f Cities Single- family residential home & lot standards aid a /I 1 v C111 w I R -5 R -2 R -3 Min. lot area 15,000 18,000 11,000 Min. side setback 10' (5' detached 10' (20' detached 10' (10' detached Max. building garage) ara e) ara e Min. rear setback 30' (10' detached 30' (10' detached 30' (10' detached None garage) ara e) —garage) Max. building 35' 35' 35' height* FAR None None None Max. building None None None coverage Max. impervious None None None surface F +ti,o * Measured from'the 17rst above- graoe, nanIraoie uvui w Ulr_ lii6il�ZL r__, �� - �•�- -��- - - - highest gable of a pitched roof. (Top of pitched roof) 1312111U Zoning R -1 R -1 A R -1 AA Min. lot area 10,000 12,150 10,800 Min. side setback 10' (5' detached 10'. (5' detached 10' (5' detached Max. building garage) garage) ara e) Min. rear setback 30' (5' detached 35' (5' detached 30' (5' detached None garage) garage) garage) Max. building 30' 35' 30' height* FAR None None None Max. building None None None coverage Max. impervious I None None None surface �L ., a;� +,,, v f * Measured from the grade of the buiicing io me corill— ul a LiaL Luvi •.� •�.� --- - - - - - -- the highest gable on a pitched or hip roof. (Mid point of pitched roof) 1310011111119. LU11 R -1 RS -1 Zoning 11,000 33,000 Min. lot area Min. side setback 10' (5' detached garage) 10' (5' detached garage) Min. rear setback 30' 10' detached garage 30' (10' detached garage) Max. building 19 -40 feet depending on setback 19 -40 feet depending on height* (2-story limit ) setback (2-story limit) FAR None None Max. building . None None coverage 35% 35% Max. impervious surface _ . + +;�;,,,,,,P�;a +P��, * Measured from the loweSi eXlsnng glUULIu cicvauvi.i IJ— _- adjacent to the structure to the highest point on any part of the structure, including rooftop equipment. (Top of pitched roof) iT a , 2 Mlarnowillo Zoning - R -1 Min. lot area 10,000 Min. side setback 10' (5' detached garage) Min. rear setback 30' (8' detached garage) Max. building height* 30' FAR None Max. building coverage None Max. impervious surface None * Measured from the average elevation of the adjoining ground level to the top of a flat roof and the mean distance of the highest gable on a pitched roof. (Mid -point of pitched roof) r-____ LGiyul l Zoning R -1 R -1 S Min. lot area 12,000 8,000 Min. side setback 10' (5' detached 6' (5' detached 15' (10' detached garage) garage) Min. rear setback 15' (5' detached 15' (5' detached garage) ara a ) ara e Max. height* 35' 35' FAR None None Max. building 20% 25% coverage Max. impervious None None surface None coverage Max. Impervious * Measured from the average elevation of the highest and lowest points within a five foot horizontal distance from the exterior building foundation to the highest point of a flat roof, or the average height of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof. (Mid -point of pitched roof, from average elevation.) =13 oW Zoning R1 -22 R1 -13.5 R1 -9.5 Min. lot area. 22,000 13,500 9,500 Min. side setback 15' (10' detached 10' (10' detached 5' (5' detached garage) garage) garage) Max. building 40' (10' detached 40' (10' detached 40' (5' detached height* garage) garage) garage) FAR None None None Max. building None None None coverage Max. Impervious None None None surface * Measured to the mid point of the highest pitch of the roof. Measurement is from the highest grade. If grade drops more than 10 feet, the measurement is taken from the lowest grade, and 10 feet is added to the 40 -foot requirement. (Mid -point of pitched roof) A3 3 Pr$inn Zoning R -1 Min. lot area 9,000 Min. side setback 10' (3' detached garage) 5' if lot is less than 75' wide Min. rear setback 25' 3' detached garage Max. building height* 30' FAR None Max. building coverage 25% 30% if lot is less than 9,000 s uare feet Max. Impervious surface None * Measured to the mid point of the highest pitch of the roof. Measurement is from the front or street elevation. Zoning R -1 A R -1 B R -1 c Min. lot area 6,000 8,000 12,000 Min. side 1 story = 8 feet 1 story = 8 feet 1 story = 10 feet setback 2 story = 8 feet 2 story = 8 feet 2 story = 12 feet 30' 3 story = 10 feet 3 story 10 feet 3 story = 14 feet Min. rear 25' 30' 35' setback FAR None None Max. building 35' 35' 35' height* None None Max. impervious surface FAR None None None Max. building 35% 35% 35% coverage Max. None None None Impervious surface * Measured to the mid point of the tughest pitcn oz the roof. Ivleasu1-c1Uc11L 1ti LLUU1 u avclarc front or street elevation. Zoning RS -1 RS -2 RS -3 RS-4 Min. lot area 20,000 15,000 11,000 9,375 Min. side setback 15' 15' 10' 7' Min. rear setback 30' 30' 30' 30' Max. building height* 35' 35' 35' 25' FAR None None None None Max. building coverage None None None None Max. impervious surface None None None None * Measured from the mean ground level to the top of a teat roof; to the mean msramx of air- highest gable on a pitched or hip roof. (Mid -point of pitched roof) IT I rd i 1 OVIO u0 %WU WVU Zonis R -1 R -2 R °263 Min. lot area 20,000 10,000 10,800 Min. side setback 5' (30' a re ate 5' 15' a re ate 5' 15' aggregate Min. rear setback 30' 30' 30' Max. building 35' I 35' 35' height* FAR None None None Max. building None None None coverage Max. impervious' None None None surface * Measured from the mean grouna level w Lac pup u1 a u— iw v u— ­..., ..� -- - -- - - -- highest gable of a pitched or hip roof, to the deck line of a mansard roof, or to the uppermost point on all other roof types ..(Mid -point of pitched roof, from average elevation.) Minnafnnka Zoning R -1 Min. lot area 22,000 Min. side setback 15' (15' detached garage) Min. rear setback 40' (15' detached garage) Max. building height* 35' FAR None Max. building coverage None Max. Impervious surface None * Measured to the mid point of the highest pitch of the roof. Measurement is from the highest grade. If grade drops more than 10 feet, the measurement is taken from the lowest grade, and 10 feet is added to the 35 -foot requirement. (Mid -point of pitched roof.) k1co ► Rrinhtnn Zoning v R -1 Min. lot area 10,000 Min. side setback 5' Min. rear setback 5' Max. building height* 30' FAR None Max. building coverage 30% Max. Impervious surface 50% * Measured from grade to the highest point of a flat roof, or to the average height of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof. (Mid -point of pitched roof.) S 5 ro euvwLIU Zoning RSF -1 RSF -2 RSF -3 Min. lot area 18,500 12,500 7,000 Min. side setback 15' (6' detached 10' (6' detached 8' (6' detached I garage) garage) garage) Min. rear setback 25' (6' detached 25' (6' detached 25' (6' detached garage) garage) garage) garage) Max. building 35' 35' 35' hei ht" None Max. building 35% FAR None None None Max. building 30% 30% 35% coverage Max. impervious None None None surface * Measured t=om the average .or the mgnest anu luwcsL PWIIL uI 61 auc. llll "I"� it -11— -� �••� •� covered by the building to the highest point of a flat roof and the mean height between eaves and ridge for a gable, hip and gambrel roof. (Mid -point of pitched roof, from average elevation.) 04- 0 D -mrL- Zoning R -1 R -2 Min. lot area 9,500 7,200 Min. side setback 9' one side and 6' Tone side and 5' 10' (5' detached on the other (2' on the other (2' I detached garage) detached arage) Min. rear setback 25' (2' detached . 25' (6' detached 20' (5' detached garage garage) Max. building 30' 30' hei ht* 30' 40' FAR None None Max. building 35% 35% coverage 20% 20 °,0 Max. impervious None None surface surface * Measured from the highest elevation between the building and the curb to mid point of a pitched roof. . rrw cw�w Zoning R -3A R -2A R -2 Min. lot area 9,000 25,000 15,000 Min. side setback 10' (5' detached 15' (15' detached 10' (5' detached I garage)_ gara a ara e Min. rear setback 20' (5' detached 20' (5' detached 20' (5' detached garage) garage) garage) Max. building height* 30' 40' 30' FAR None None None Max. building 30% 20% 20 °,0 coverage Max. impervious None None None surface * Measured from the iughest ac�OUnng s]Qewam Ur g'luuilu �ulia�c VVIU 11 from the exterior wall to the highest point of a flat roof or the average height of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof. (Mid -point of pitched roof.) A� 6 PI P.•,.,.I . I. � Zoning R-4 Min. lot area 10,000 Min. side setback 10' (5' detached garage Min. rear setback 25' (5' detached garage) Max. height 40' (3- stories FAR None Max. building coverage 35% Max. impervious surface None * Measured to the mid point of the highest pitch of the roof. Measurement is from the highest grade. If grade drops more than 10 feet, the measurement is taken from the lowest grade, and 10 feet is added to the 40 -foot re4uirement. (Mid -point of pitched roof.) 0 7 Minneapolis vs. Edina Zoning Ordinance Comparison Ordinance Provision Edina Minneapolis Height 30 feet 30 feet (reduced from 35 Side Setback 5 -10 feet depending on lot Nuidth. Setback must be 5 feet (R -1) 6 feet (R-1 A) increased based on height no matter the height Building Coverage 25% - lot over 9,000 s.f. 30% - lot under 9,000 s.f. 50% (reduced from 60 %) Im ervious Surface No requirement 65% (reduced from 75 %) Floor Area Ratio No requirement *50% see exceptions) Minimum Lot Size 9,000 s.f. (or median lot size of neighborhood) 5,000 s.f (R -IA) 6,000 s.f. (R -1) _r *In order to encourage traomonai ouilainy 1eaLu1 C:>, 1-CI L0 11 put Vila homes are not counted toward the FAR, including the following: 1. Detached garages 2. Attached garages that are 250 sq. ft. or less (one parking stall). Attached garages size in excess of 250 sq. ft. will be counted toward the total size of the home. 3. Half stories. This is area under a hip or gable roof that is half the square footage of the floor below. Half stories can be livable space, such as bedrooms. 4. Basements that do not project more than 4 ft. from grade. 5. Open porches Additional Exceptions. The FAR .requirements include two types of exceptions to the FAR. The first allows for up to a 500 sq. ft. building addition for homes that exceed the FAR or would exceed the FAR with that addition. The other exception allows for the FAR and height to be increased when a minimum of half the homes within 100 ft. of a site also exceed the FAR or height requirements. k7% ` }: fi �. V- ._.;:. =_ r-, - . F':, r � .r,., ... _ . �._. rLlf,IiFAV LOGISMap Output Page A m 5201 5300 5305 5200 5209 5308 5213 5212 5217 5216 5221 5220 5329 5224 5237 5332 5337 5228 5241 5227 5225 24 a 5232 5245 5236 5304 5300 5305 5_'+04 5309 5308 5313 $312 5317 5316 5320 5324 5325 5329 5328 5333 5332 5337 5336 4502 4500 GOLF 7FA 4504 tyacaaNa-A-G \1S CcT. g'[iCi 5401 5400 5403 5404 5409 5408 5413 5412 5417 ��:+' »� 5409 5201 5336��01 szoo 534619 5211 5216 5217 5400 52200 5221 b 5409 5224 a i 5412 5229 0 5227 5225 24 a 5232 5224 a 0 z� D 5228 ,9233 3 31U 5236 � 4 al 5232 i 5237 5240 5241 a �i/ 5236 3389 S7 w 5304 ., 5300 -% I „_0w1 1.4 APPO 5307 / // • / 5313 5318� 5325X. 5324 q�D g 5331; 5328,,, P/ l 5341 7 5336��01 534.Aj 534619 5351 5409 5401 5400 5405 5404 5409 5408 5413 5412 5416 (LITI 0 34TH S7 W 540E 5400 5405 5404 5409 5408 5413 5412 5417 5416 24 A m Page 1 of 1 \� 5230 24 .� 24 DD 5404 5412 5417 5416 (CALCULAWONS lWoOff 47TAcOo CAW( WAMI) I m m <mm x Nxz L.- z 1 m J C r D V n /I i I I I I lu A 10 I I I I I I O = °z0 7 n X N '' - O C O rn O Z k� T 84S M N O z z m !� A IdI AN'th I i z D m C z D min ma, °, Sev Im z -i' N �N1ru �® 0"o .. c O�m?S �I 0L >� I S6 v> G >' M 4 I ="3 =O no c ° AD�� m M �o J r P N "OO 1 ID zz Z-1 ED G 3 O° p m m XXI n m C C p� fn _ m 3 ��/ c °Qp:° o m m3�'z ww °® -1Sp m D ° a ;-D _ �od m N m I C mmmm to N D I z D G 4 in M I C M- m o n� z m °z >cm m ° o D 3 b 5r0 5. 'S .° z10 DOmo°Ao O -m o O r G 0A �° °m ' n 0 o nD N ^'o SS'a c .o .p .p °.v D p a =v° m e a v OO DmM9 m pn °� ri DO z- o9olm �D6 m n C Nn p •M m D D= = m m K m = D i17 -- C s m '7!�= 3 I m m <mm x Nxz L.- z 1 m J C r D V n /I i I I I I lu A 10 I I I I I I O = °z0 7 n X N '' - O C O rn O Z k� T 84S M N O z z m !� A IdI AN'th I i z D m C z D min ma, °, Sev Im z -i' N �N1ru �® 0"o .. c O�m?S �I 0L >� I S6 v> G >' M 4 I ="3 =O no c ° AD�� m M �o J r P N "OO 1 ID gZ. m� D_ Z-1 ED G 3 O° p m m ° m n m C C p� fn _ m 3 ��/ c °Qp:° o m spy° 0 -1Sp m D ° a ;-D _ �od m �? mmmm to N p ° > 0 DK N ;n n D G >0. m � n in M o o D C M- m os °z >cm n zzc O a� C° O 1. m NN > m_mc m-40 3 rOnrmr m -1 _ ON pn °� ri DO z- =3° p m���� mm Y/ = D i17 -- s i �mQ3 4,°D X 260 ° a�0 9 J� m ' .I. J m 9 N p� o., D O X89)' dk> 0 r^ r x z II m O v C 0 z ` n ` 1 � 1 O�m?S �I >� I S6 L m 11 +I m I °mD x m I CD J r P N "OO 1 ID Z-1 —B96— -OJ - -I ' p a) c A /r'A li it <o ©; o z <° /1 d l mu L- I N Tml C 9 N z n i l N I. ax OP >I o IA >I � o -i 01 _ HARRY S. JOHNSON CO. INC. lI i-3-7466MPB 41 FOUNDATION AS -BUILT LAND SURVEYORS & CONSULTANT^ 9063 Lynoole Avenue South .o fir, Bloomington. Mn. 55420 200721203 606 DAILEY HOMES INC. (952) 884 -5341 (952)864 -5344 Fox „d — *= SITE; SMS OAKLAWN AVENUE Email: tom@hsjsurveyors.com OF 1 CBT EDINA, MINNESOTA Web: www.hsjsurveyors . com A-A 4;1.61 OAKLAWA t � .� �. >< ~ i V � �M r .f' •iir 1, , r' e 1 t. , ll �• .� H1rJ.yli.�,C.; �y ..a v • f t r(•. �9'r Tj LAW tK• 1•�•'' ; 'iw.� iy: � try i,M Y' 1���: J'�+ ' .'•j �� � ':� i"y - 4 rl y ►j OW '.mod ,4 Off J°3e - app . � u .,M. � p•,1 `'.'* , �� !j ti ..0 ..rt + - ar .— -Woo, .wr �� A?I r" .r ,�I a '�'M. ,1 � ;Sri. �� .•'. , �. =i� '�^ r''- �;��" ,, � ,�.^ .'� If.. „ 111. �rW � • ,cif '�;f��� J "�' YL A LOGISMap Output Page Page I of 1 -71 CC OW I sees HY -I Proposed Top of Block J22a. IZ Proposed Garoge Floor 8.7Z- Proposed Lowest Floor • Ira F— /J/ CID op - 9000 all 3ek1 -- I 8. 1o.a 1L211.621 e�D I I PICKET-' FENCE 4 3, ELMWOOD TERRACE Type of Building — votion VED HOMEBUILDERS RETAINING SPLIT RAIL Ii ig. Dept. , - WALL , - FENCE— -- , inage IRON I I 165.32 _OW 365.44 / , 87.5 0 27 m _ _ _ ,. 879.11 88; F— /J/ CID op - 9000 all 3ek1 -- I 8. 1o.a 1L211.621 e�D I I PICKET-' FENCE 4 3, ELMWOOD TERRACE L ily to the above named person or persona ■nets, mortgages or title Insurom f 9 9� klalt 'U,I � ),� / V) MANHQLL in are from plate of record of Information provided by client. "J TOP= 898.24 id floor elevations must be verified by talent. 31.12 INV =B 8.29 his survey was prepared by me or under and that I am a duly Registered Land Ili rs of the State of Minnesota. Sinned: 24th day of October , 20 06 Revised: October 25th, 2006. Milton E. HylOnd, Minn R= votion evation inage NE 1 4, Sec. 19 Twp. 28. R. 24_; MANHOLE TOP = 895.37 i.37 TC INV= 886.98 o ;74- C7 4 C) I N A r<t rr — 897. l - — L ily to the above named person or persona ■nets, mortgages or title Insurom f 9 9� klalt 'U,I � ),� / V) MANHQLL in are from plate of record of Information provided by client. "J TOP= 898.24 id floor elevations must be verified by talent. 31.12 INV =B 8.29 his survey was prepared by me or under and that I am a duly Registered Land Ili rs of the State of Minnesota. Sinned: 24th day of October , 20 06 Revised: October 25th, 2006. Milton E. HylOnd, Minn R= M rrAvL a�Q fi. nad ® sToCr- B%-�t CONTRACTOR VERIFY ALL INFORMATION U4• V- CONTRACTOR STARTING CONSTRUCTION -,p I la & l 1L Page I of I St LOGISMap output Page. Page I of I 5600 5520 5700 5701 14 [ 5705 57TH ST W 5700 5701 5700 5705 5704 5705 5704 rt'� �NowdN LOT zi2E Go' y t33 Mp Ub 5608 SET143TW- ¢5601 5600 5612 5601 5605 aq 5605 5.604 5616 5609 5604 5609 5608 562 S613 5672 5613 5608 , 5617 5616 5624 5672 56 21 a b '5620 5621 5516 A 5625 5624 5628 6625 5620 5629 IT15628 5636 r 5629 5624 5633 3704 3700 . . vi 5632 1 563 5640 .13 5633 5628 5637 3612 3608 A 5636 5 5637 5632 5641 5700 5701 14 [ 5705 57TH ST W 5700 5701 5700 5705 5704 5705 5704 rt'� �NowdN LOT zi2E Go' y t33 Mp Ub r J iii V i 46.E is i lJ V'4 a 4 4 46 44 44 44 - . \ �� -- - -- -- �•rr -- Denotes -r -- -- - --- Surface Drainage •' � d d r b' Property Address: 5617 Chowen Avenue S. Edina, MN Property located in Section 20, Township 28, Range 24, NAnneoin County, Minnesota. 897.96 , /16 98. 35 9. 50 r- N 7 O C E n O S, I 7C 1 900.7 NOTE. P Propose gra es a e su to results of soil tests. Proposed building informa- must be checked with op building plan and developn Cc I � W4 grading plan before excav 61 W- undo t ion $ 1 'j6p PC l t 898.4 , °� -- - Ca - - 132` � _ 97.�13 �� Plat �. o . 84 meal. 898.9 898. 7 1897. 0 HOUSE No. 5521 rroposea winavw wells 895.3 895. N A N ). E1 1 I power pole 894. w /anchor $g4.� 1,. b FIRhvV_. FINAL PLUMBING, HVAC AND ELECTRICAL PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS REQUIRED BEFORE FRAMING INSPECTION HARDIE B' HARDIE T 6" HARDIE T CULTUI STONE _A -1 REAR ELEVATION SCALE- VS' " V -O' ASPHALT SHINGLES SOFFIT 4 HARDIE SUB- FASCIA 12 4 F- IARDIE LAP SIDING CULTURED STONE VERIFY — — L = — i SITE E ON lam____. RIGHT SIDE ELEVATION SCALE, 11B' " V -O" y e� OFlnimum 4" high, cones. 1 tinlldln9 addn� ��' I IE TRIM SOFFIT 4 HARDIE MB- FASCIA LAP SIDING TRIM ED ON A P. BASE 11 9 12 —l4 4r 4mm VA* � K Lw S90B eode 0 Page I of I E —+l\,;farxi7;tip\Pn' Tmqcyt-..r,\Phntn,,;\3311721320015001.JPG 2/19/2008 5809 5808 5807 5808 5812 5813 5811 5813 9itP RFJY7CW A YP 5215 _ 24 5205 _ 5201 5113 5209 5905 5904 . 367 i 5908 5909 5913 5912 5977 • v 5976 '911 5212 5208 5204 5200 50TH ST W 5121 I 5117 I 5113 I 5109 I m A M 5116 5112 5108 5120 (LOT 5,1ZE= �� 6M 5- F. u��L 6,,, [i 0 5109 5108 ` 5908 Code Ave., Under the current code existing height = _ _ home would have to be 4.8 ft shorter. There would be no change �. in side yard setback. Nona It should be noted that the lot is quite large, (32,187 sq ft). The house is approximately 4% of the lot. conlxete curb and gutte ' • � � 1 Ice _ ,y+ •t• •. 9 I °� Ir4 + 0 (co 3 I L0 P LO CI _ I 0 I O!b 00 L 0 ; 1A C13 <T OI V _n 16 R m Cr m `o 9 �p,56 /O � 3 c' A ` �. St c r♦ � V p � ' i t • 9t' i. f i. r� f r r f J6 --� I 'S ,•F� TT d ggA //Qj a o o� c0 py'd.,* f3 . concrete curb and gutter 104.6'6. (plot) ���• 9 84t.s (P ) I �. i � 1 _ I I is col O 1 ° • 77, rol i a h •a:C la'_ OD nu,,t.._.. . I 0 1 V }� , NO °�` c u c CL 94F�' ro p r I ° -020 9 building setback line - I c'o v �wtZ�,•T!pra • 942 —All 9$ . � i.x {r'� 04 •9 - -- -All - sse detol) ���g i 1 e E .n --937 house <-'0 =1. 7 47 E4 • i Proposed I I fl x 934.7 1 _-V ' - 35 B• KiAproposed house I O i� N ('•� D A T] I (e°' Win) I ") v 934— 30 lSRA k��:`� 1 933 --8-- / 1 V oaad deck _ _Z.6 O (M1-- - -932- W Scale: 1 DB�cripii3Ora � -AIL . N (As provided r- 1 A r 0 I C 0• r\ A r 1 Lot 9, Block a-� r l fi rra according to Hennepin Cot +� a 1 x 945.0 AX ryq Drive and si, c �icv� r♦ °� 1 Stoop on sc House Shed Total Hardu_ Total Lot An I Percent Har , },p�./f/ }� O Off �• - L C m o LECE, • F �I a / �` \ jj '�w "1 A O I J�o I c°�• }�`� �G7 j� i'2�11``^.dP rinr ^� G. t — Y A �3 6905 ERW TB 6904 6 5813 6009 6005 6025 6021 6017 6013 6908 " 6909 5809 6912 A _0_?B SOCK I 6000 5920 5912 5900 r1120 5816 5812 5808 Ap 04 6005 1 6001 _ 70774 S7 W ` 7001 7 000 7000 fa:- a .• 70 7001 5905 i 7005 7004 7008 7008 7077 G ' 7012, . 7009 7016 7000 7013 - 7021 7075 7020 7019 7fO} 7020 7021 7024 d po 8 7012 � 7013 7701 4 7105' 7. 05, Uacs�'w�A'c1ti15 Cm.- gct!'; 1ST", G63u5 11000 APTO I M - ZE r V A �3 s + •1 r ri: I � • �'� IpACCII. fPbll ICrI ��y4� .y�S,' - ' d j _' •"� r"+ S NUI SIR f' "+LJ'i' _ �• .n... !�11 e F 7. .7.. . _�-'�. iFP�'_ G.Nh+'�L '�'{° ��UiC r°�1l1. 1.• ' � ;: Eii 24 K' ri .. -, it? T7`t, T � , i,t.'�A+'i 1'aA v T�'�i {fj 1F \ ) M Ip i6i Sri r i , fl 7000 Antr Under the current code existing height 5ft, home would have tco_be I- 5_feELsh erg There would be no iMAF change in side yard setbacks. It should be noted that the lot is large, (60, 300 s 1 ft RE-T-- # 2 � REA WI V-, Cb ti \ ', (—JJ1 SGP��� O I \� � ' ' cD I 86 �pG •� gb`�' 9gti I ag n 9 9� ET. :. 12 85— — — n — 9 — — $ L— IL — — 30.0 — — X16.0 0 16. 986.) j cc ' a9ti$ 1 17.5 96 N TFE= 993.25 EXISTING 'a X LQ d PROPOSEZ)OU bb 2- X W, PS Q WICKMAN 15.0 986 i 9. 5 ESIDEIVCE +gLFE =984.4 �. �'C' , < (994.0)X ,a. Ps�X(92.0) I �� • cP I I CD `9 POOL l IX(994.Qa 59. 9 g' �+ � 2. 1b6 �i 5.7 a (9 2.5)X 9 w 90 4c, �" I� r + % 0 9g� TEIdM Cl 1,r�T I I I O� ra'� / �o'e� 0 /ti - 1 / Rf T 6 0 i +�"�?� i I I P O 4 9, e 01k 2� ; Q� � O COP C�� I =992.5 \ I y992.5)X. CL 0 ...... °. o/ SILT FENCE S 87017'j 1 " E 2556 P _1.. ��° —z.: SO LA T, 254.3 : AS. f.:T / TRANS Add LOGISMap Output Page J 4100 / 4701 4021 Page 1 of 1 4015 66TH ST W t s 4001 a 6 4000 4000.21 4001 4000 rS • a3 4003 p 4002 4004 1d .1-7 4003 4 4008 a 13 4009 r i(6 4011 4004 4006 .a 4010 ^� a3 4007 4008 .23 37 4011 7y 4012 33 4016 4020 4075 4012 a� 4013 .a .4015 4008 3 ' 4014 3 D 4010 , k3 4015 � l 3l 4077 4019 4076 .11 4018 4020 4020 a 4021 4 022 4022 ' 4024 4023 4024 4026 4025 J 4100 / 4701 4021 Page 1 of 1 4015 I? i J �h. 1 i 1 2on •3 z G I I B LEGEND FII ED FLOOR *,,,k- FOUND Found Property Monument V.= 899.82 �\ SET IRON Set None/- rt IRON (Minn. 6Ieg. yNa 2 ::•; :: :: : ::: Concrete 9 Retaining Wall FINISHED FLOOR _ `OO �, r Fence -4005 Under the current code existing height would have to er under new code requirements. ir7crease 2.7 ft for living space above the garage on the north side and the new set5acK wou d require an additional 1.87 ft on the south side. The home would not fit on the lot given setbacks. rINI,Mt1J FLUUK" "k- e Pr ETlVotleff _ � �' h � X(894.1) aP E L E v. = 8 9 5.5 3 . M td� Proposed Drainage Arrow /�� / / / / /���� // `fit` Existing Drainage Arrow 0,1 °� �� S EXISTING BUILDING o;°' `�,� t�X SET ---- -41 -3- - -- - i / / �d 89'36'22" °1 1 5.28 l E V` - -IRON ". IOC �9S —°, 89 cnI 1.2 9 g v� 89 — - — — - - 8g3•p 893.3 8.2 . 4 S 9S0 c\i/ 9 SHE C� _Q7 _ FINISHED FLOCR ` ` /io �� ELEV.= 895.02 8.2 . 4- R (-? 39.20 _ Q *M FS AVENUE Q� ��_PROp R1 AU CONC. – IORUILDING o TONE �� 9g'J7 9 886. 8 . - STEPS �.:: Q FO PRINT AREA / AVER O �9� ,:.::;f:. 1,9 SQUARE FEET j I 2 o, 0.0) b c,�Y� o, ::::: ,: :: ,P BUILDIN / � � o,`il �' / 12.0 '� 97.5 / tD coil O �° _ _ I U) FINISHED FLOOR ELEV. = 896.92 r- �J /p–� –� -- 02 ®I N Chi (aft 08 p�� 3�5 69 � -- A -rm IV gyp. 0 I_: I 82 I A RS ��-� - -- $$9., SET _J - ' - - - -- 39.7 1b RON FINISIMED FLOOR J ' ELEV.= 891.41 ABOVE GROUND BUILDING---' FINISHED FLOOR ELEV.= 882.88 - 885. S X89 36 22 W 135.28 N BUILDING FOl c?S e I WOOD STEPS �` I IRO �- PROPOSED RET. (MALL = =`J.= 891.3E _ CONC. STEPS l� 20 10 0 20 P1 SCALE IN FEET 10 HARD MK U2 PITCH TWAJSV= U". OlU 01 M � 0. ' I n¢ nam MIND SM eoLL Ram ism II Br GIAF'me31 tleI/IRF ImT em51� i1mrtD11 m ne-1/m1LLS gems T Lt9eLLS ao eNa®rrr Ta tmLIME m mmmole cmooa m O®76 eeiell mld0a6 6 ME 111ffid SIM Rei PIMMM Q va.mm man �LLe6 en e®t DO N07G-O I) ELLVATION 15 AN ART4STIL R CEZM5 M LY. ACTUAL ELEVATIOJ S.MAY VARY 2) ALL OVRHAI DM SHALL BE Ib' TYPICAL MaS NOW OTwsbq 2: 3) ALL RAKE DIM SHALL BE III TYPICAL UNLESS No= OTTC mse 4) DO PRUNED TRIM FASCIA 3/b' 5MOOTN PAINTED FLYK= 50FAT YV C/�Nf. KENT SJ HAW LAP SIDWS W 6' W"IDWIIM ON ALL SM UM,UirERNAI ANDOM 6ROS SEEN 1 AS 51i" T) ALL EXTERM 61 TOEeLOWE 8) MNDOX l46. TO MARVRI.YHNDOlS l DOORS an PITGlI TlROUS1L�lJT U". 194 MARDI CORXR MK TRM fPYP)T A �'.I I► LYI INl T, Ie•ll' \I I.�r..l .�i_ -A IIIN II. IN t. 1 ■ ttttt\ Kom m= TO LANE. STEP M= 4 FOOTII'L°5 AS FrEM, 0 N' VMPf YU GRADE ON S lE RETAIN AS 'n@ PITGH T}i'20U5'HalT U1V0 IB� SMOOTH PAPHED PLYMOOD FM rrrPJ w commas V RAW LORMSt 4 TRM fTYP) =C-mo SMOOTH P RDI LAP SIDINS 6' ESE fT M Ixs R -t-a 294 of 1X4 HARDI WRID2 l YCIK TRIM fTYP) D16TYLE EOSE 5/4X4 FRJZ BOARD fTYPJ kQ 11 II. IN t. 1 ■ ttttt\ tttt. IN � t. t ■ I; ■ I � � ��' j �� tttt. ON � Mimi s as = flltllt11111• o �- o L�1 -.�Iv_ ---------- - e o - -_ _ ----------- --------------- i:JU __► - 1 i� _ __ kQ 11 • • ♦ •�:�Y;t. ,.at'. ! S^3rr . ry �.i` 1 � its. � f7 Nt �:., �i Y r. ,6 . - ..E'... - . I, , . � - I., . •a� YJ , w Ch f 1 ' J _ Ir , FOR _ K Aft r "u 1 a. ct11 _ i lJ+�•4r1i�.� ��f11 t I IM1L I�jt11 �. II Tt', �j• At �. l yZ,i'�4i101.t LOGISMap Output Page F216 2 X220 i -r 4231 4232 l.11TLE ,ST 4321 4317 4313 4309 4305 4116 4211 4206 t 4213 r F �� 4212 ; 4117 4216 , 4217 4220 - 4219 4224 4221 4126 4223 4228 4120 4230 4227 4232 i 4231 4121 4233 4236 4227 4229 4231 4233 w 4408 4406 4404 4330 4124 F216 2 X220 i -r 4231 4232 l.11TLE ,ST 4321 4317 4313 4309 4305 1 4301 4211 4206 t 4213 r F �� 4212 ; 4215 4216 , 4217 4220 - 4219 4224 4221 4126 4223 4228 4225 4230 4227 4232 i 4231 4234 4233 4236 Page I of I Q ~ I 4125 I 4212 I 4202 I 4200 4221 4117 4215 421: 4209 4120 4213 4121 4124. _. 4215 Q ~ I 4125 I 4212 I 4202 I 4200 4221 4217 4215 421: 4209 4213 r 4215 4217 - 4219 4221 4223 - 4225 4227 4229 4231 4233 Ala c�td +• +- �A'MIS Cmr'$t;L - -� .•mom ell FAR Ck I c (LoT HI 4208 4212 4216 4218 4222 4224 4226 4230 4232 9411 4601 OREXEL W- file: /A \ed -ntl \citvwide\PD SIma ,ges\Photos\ 1802824120144001.JPG Page 1 of 1 2/19/2008 wpm mesn rah Vwcan rrrs t P.0 or or m ob SILT FENCE MIISTSE p� INS'1'ALLEU PRIOR TO AN]' INspwr10NS FinaC a chars p Id terrtped rra.rat enu rrmlr ft. rnknln t IJmurel m0 fv� •gam : 0 asn ranhman Coto: �oPOndltrq span oaNkprmmn. tank W roe heIDr .1th �L ram, rJOei pasts c.Rh it rlms, m rmmr Pmts wain stapeac. i9om. esz: Tnftm tivosenblan tar mA brae V nL V GuR9CU7 CS Be: C C "p5c es;... Established in 1962 'LVEYS COMPANY, INC. ,AND SURVEYORS [DER THE LAWS OF STATE OF MINNESOTA 1 (763) 690 -3003 Fns No. 690 -3522 IRnoaapolla• IOnnesola 55429 rUars Tertifiratr CERTIFICATE OF PROPOSED I1IPROVE269NIS bated in Section p 28. Range 'L4, aunty, Minnesote BENCHMARK: Top Nut Hydrant at the Northeast corner of WDoddale Ave. and Bridge Street 897.23 OR6j0.�1 qVF INVOICE NO. 73055 F. B. N0. 1006 -64 SCALE: 1 " = 20' O Denotes iron Monument p Denotes Wood Hub Set for excavation only x000.0 Denotes Existing Elevation (@.0 ) Denotes Proposed Elevation Denotes Surface Drainage NOTE: Proposed grades are subject to results of soil tests. Proposed building information must be checked with approved building plan and development or grading plan before excavation and construction. 8951' Proposed Top of Black M5.0 Proposed Garage Floor B83.b Proposed Lowest Floor Type of Building FU 1166.4MC4 Note: Existing improvements on Lot 37 not shown Brfra'ge Street 895.0 I—P J.7 : •'' eight ae Na. P Front Setbacks of Houses e5,0 R� / o wsq alogt Drexel Avenue Fhmbers 36.0 ft. 70E 4605 42.0 ft. ear 4607 30.9 ft. 4609 35.3 ft. 4611 30.0 ft. 4613 30.6 ft. ?OD sq. ft. 4615 35.3 ft 334 sq. ft. 4617 30.6 ft. 302 4619 30.3 ft. 4621 35.0 ft. 4623 35.5 ft. r' 4625 32.8 ft. t 4627 35.4 ft. V) 4629 36.3 ft. ' 4633 31.3 ft. The only easements shown ore from plots of record or inf. provided by client. -d. or information We hereby certify that this is o true and correct represent( o survey of the boundaries of the above described land onnpresentation of location of all buildings and visible encroachments, if any, i land and the said land. if any, from or on v Survelled by us this lath day of July 2005. Rev Drown By grown By 5.. JA— F le Nome le Nome ccd- 37 -51bi 006fi4i- 7- '055.dw9 a, ++ob in Grncrara rC CURCCUr Lot 37, Block 8, COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT FAIRWAY SECTION -D -Ksyet- Signed Charles F. derson, Minn. Rea_. No. 21753 or Gregory R. Prosch, Minn. Rea. No. 24992 05`� FAP\ Y � ;//4 G ♦ij. {Z a� =1NU: wIT -1 COMPD61T aN —�. �� L�- 1ItJ�t -ES (wrn -1 A�� oPr+oN OF FpUK SI.eTE M C6-K- A!AOW$ 1 Tug OF wi Is 1cI.�JATIGT -1 9?b.eh'� i i I GE77lXL 6Y2ACILE�CS�YYf'� � Q t1Jney, MUJ IG RNA e i EuTV r GARAGE _ v NI SYUGGO_ 3EXtUIZ� _ 1- IA12171 P/1NEL COM {XK�IY� .T121M '[UpOYL FSWff1aU. -- V P.�A4rcDS HAIZDIT"IZIM —_ _ J� COMPOSITE FSenrzr ��P�. Lt:G�,E OIZ Fn6GA5CCSLC_ CAP .. _ T M4-n -WAS ' yI W RUIXJ -F•'i IKON 7NLR♦j• BY�i• 2� o" 2uo Fwo2 r SF-T FA67c I I FOe WIT. rzecYeJCr1oN 1I Co M F M A NCB_ IiCnF CLP_�6Tb1'� -� Tr - Ll l S:n,t IVACT _I]1�IM e.HWi"1E TOM `\\ �, i i / /— �JI6rf711JGLMATCy1- "rYI°• / _.. ev`�E- I4ACl'S= 4�Rbi PW 6L 12 '� I — .4sN�e? e�xi`�- FIAmo:-Tr�va PAd.01 P&-APU C-M P K -M — 3pFFlTa- CT'�V�.. _ I GeMPuyT1eA1 SI+ING/ -BS FE NCB I• - _5'f"ATFJ�D_TraDOp- FFzO�1T5 �� � ' _ � Tbf' elvice F_(�4_VATOIJi�IG•/{/ b— _N h L }IU C I NfLDpO«( fJk—�VJ Got.l!- rr!1� -y-I arJ - 4(o 0 2i EYIST�hfr �'tr'VG"rU Yc� - W 12tc�/tCtr, - � i�t<,J Iz�! Ir��.1.JG�_ IN '�l�i'IN,4- C-. G. G, � �! G'I �J��r =X'�L� r�Vi� �•• 2• o� .% H Established In 1962 INVOICE NO. 73414, 74154 LOT SURVEYS COMPANY, INC. F•B•NO• 1013 -49 " LAND SURVEYORS SCALE: 1 = z0' REGISTERED UNDER THE LABS OF SPATE OF ilaNNESOTA 0 Denotes Found Iron Monument 4601 76rd Avenue North - (78,1) 690 -9093 Pax de. BaD -96E2 O Denotes Iron_ Monument wim polls, laoneseta 66400 O Denotes Wood Hub Set `3 u lit P lJ � rB Lj P ri t L 13 141 for "cowtitm only xDOO.0 Denotes Existing Devotion JM5 CU 90 Denotes Proposed Elevation STOM HOMES CONCEPT 1�, J.'� g ­dlf- Denotes Surface Drainage NOTE Proposed g des are subject to results . soil tests. Property located in Section APPROVED proposed building information 38, Township 28, Range 24, must be checked with approved Hennepin - County, Minnesota Date 1­11314L budding plan] and development or grading plan I before excavation V and construdbon. Benchmark: Top nut hydrant Bridge Street B Cityoi Edina Mg. DeA gvg.0 and Bruce Avenue. Proposed Top of Block Elevation = 591.88 (City Datum) ��o T, 21 A60 Proposed Garage Floor Note: Top of Foundations Not Accessible. pe � � Proposed Lowest Floor Type of Building - gM2-7 - rattl^ 4v 4arAg2 Deletes pwpased retaining u&U or« 5/� ff2�i�i f APPTOVC-d Grading 2nd �r_,;,,�,,e Plan requires; prior to a!terirlg any grades ri r I�:agwEbv and /or drainage -� 920.0 e % �•J°-iIUCGO C m L•' l^1 =10 (Z [Tt%xIJ ING No. 46L-* FF Elwv rn T if r i �d �i'�,G�tY1 B--TO n OF NB.J z° s 13%)SIr Tt'f , am 5a r�.UJA.L.t. 3 6�0 6iv61 A) -E- W . 8� s . Ore aWi,es .ra..; wall.;i� ,,4r ) F hmpy Pd Y n C✓2zla� i Z T i sea 0- .. .... 094.0 � "o .q1, ry 62.10• f" B �': Bc I ! 2 K & � � I.el �� r b S� 9u•n•2s• S p9..19 j , npls L.- - : Y (u U es°a 347 j h r e -"' 888.6 C o LZ ! 030.2 !99_92 1 - o Z eISB. e w n n �. .... 41'P .1 -y 1 2 ¢ • 1 /•Pins P a tIy 00 J990 ¢ig 8 ■ Pro o4wa Driviiegy [ s .o •77• 1 j ®0O iss /o 0940 �" .�9a.9 I a a9.m ew -� B9e�/ -• I `c?e. 131:0 >• •ISCy e@: ec w PUUic CwPpst Waod 94.5 94.0 I 9vuctvw Gl1LOt otm- relLyrs � � ry 4600 0, No. 4610 I j 4600 30.3 4602 36.1 Average Setboek Distance 35 w I Y i 4604 35.0 4606 Note: Setback distances shorn"1 ll 33.7 mein building 4608 34.9 4610 34.6 null and doe g rt ` include covered stoops oro�Gleverdn ti. + ilr,'agw INSTALLED PRIOR TO , - E10. == 4612 35.0 - . 9/e0 4514 35.0 4616 35.3 Falaft 4618 35.2 Daaybn oe 4620 34.8 4622 35.3 •d)reh 4624 37.5 Nmaal 4525 35.1 hen rtatm 4628 35.0 4630 35.2 4532 35.6 Lot 5, Block 9, COUNTRY CLUB D1STF 4634 35.3 The only casements shown ore from plats of record or information provided by client. We hereby certify that this is o true and correct representation of Lsurvey of the boundaries of the above described Pond and the location of all buildings and visible encroochments, if any, from or on said land. Surveyed by us this 21st cloy of December 2005. own By g. ,M_ e Nome d -5 -91b 1 01 34 91-74 i 64.dvg Veae muh rsYdtuae a" IoADenan sno-W teed: �, M 5. F LOT 3B5_4li s. F. Ftot, Artl 5-4 F 1 K ' �gswef or pm or stela SILT FENCE MUST BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY INSPECTIONS Falaft Daaybn oe 6arr,31 baaWM wAh tartlet r m. W eo9 Lame 1W. •d)reh , 7 Nmaal hen rtatm rnim posts�.rthh no woad Pea � tla;;W& f%tCwr a.S,t Typhtl s�2a„ br tlA ]sire I Signed Charles F. Anderson, Minn. Rea. No. 214753 or Gregory R. Prosch, Minn. Reg. No. 24992 X10 % Ta r m ck " -� r��e� `(�l�v� ��V\ -IS -O�o 3 ��r ��e��� -i4`n r 4nT W 00d 0AC f woo tr A377 Page 1 of 1 file: /A \ed- nt1 \citywide\PDSlmages \Photos \1802824210091001.1P9 2,/19/2008 1/4' Arp H- LOT r. Ft F 'R J C'e t —.zsr— hi — r }r 4506 ft4514501 4502 rr 507 4502 1 � 4504 45n5 , � 4508 - 4503 � 4509 rr 4504 _ N i3s 4513 4506 4507 R� 0 4510 ti 4505 N 4571 -y �1{ 4515 4506 4508 .2 d , • 5- `Uf' e512 4507 450 ,1 � �� 4513 517 A� 12 s'7 4510 4511 3 yp 2 1 4514 45 '9 450.4 J - 4595 4510 ,a 3k �f 45170 457'3 L�`S �~ 4516 4521 4511 4512 3 ?� f 45f7 !f �'ti •Z-t -] � 4314 ,t a+ :��o 4575 11 i 4523 - i = 4513 4514 �� � � �� 45 }19 45118 l_ .�� .7516 1 -0517Z 4515 .a 4516 �} 1 y , 4601 - -- gFiD(;g 67 � -�~ 4601 � �r 4601 4600d .3 6 1503 � 11 4600 -y �� 1031& 4602 460 . d 460:, . 4520 4603 4602 4605 4602 �j S 4604 46 6n r� 4605 46 4600 } 4605 4604 4605 4605 4606 % J o 4607 1609 4602 y �� p 4601 4606 d•C p } 4607 33 a C� 4608 a 4611 460! 4608 _ a� 460.0 4608 11 � � 4610 4613 4604 4617 461' 4610 4671 u : •� 4612 , _ 4615 1 451.3 ` 4612 4673 4574 4697 46]2 4610 4615 4615 40 "74 i� 4619 4615 4614 4676 � �! 4691 4612 mG gRfxX Fl- 4617 4621 t �--� 4617 / 1 4616 46;9 4624 '7 4616 4094 \ 4623 4614 _r�- CTYPIC4L L c) 7- sizo �0 13t, LO CCA -LC V LPr 10lJ JJ61- INCLUDE 4601 4500 4601 46003 3 4601 x 4uu 47 4504 I } 4502 0� 4503 .43 I 4502 rib 4503 •7+ 45t+A 4505 4506 •Ln� ,�� 4504 �7 45",3 j 4504 ,33 505 37 4602 3 4602 let 4506 4507 450E 6D 4.507 .23 4,506 .,4j I 4507 . JA 4506 . 2: 4597. 4603 459E 4509 4 0 3 �E fi509 �� 4505 7 d j 4509 4506 .3 7 450? �'� 4511 Z� D 4511 f •3I 4510 �j% rA! 4511 �� 4510 451} �$ 35 4510 4511 46044 $pl 1 t 605 4604 4605 4514 q �e 4513 ? 1 4512 •31 4513 .13 a3 4,512 �E 4513 ,Z 4512 4513 4516 �S ! 6� 4515 4514 6p� - VV 4515 .29 f 4514 ,a7 4515 �g 4507 4514 b 4515 T 45 ;S Sy 1g 4517 �3 4516 // 517 .�+ 2 4516 W x517 0516 ` 4557 rn 4520 gj 4519 C j TW 4516 _ 4519 ?2 3J 45]5 a 4519 1� asi8 4519 44522 .,D q �Ye U 4521 7S d 4520,1_ T 4525 4�•- 4520 7� i 4521 , 1G <520 4521 4524 4523 43 _ 3 4522 5 4523 2T 4521 30 fv 4523 .3q 4526 3s b 4525 .?1 4524 21 Oa 4525 a 4524 �® 4525 a� 4522 4523 4528 4 4527 gt tL Tl 4526 i 4527 33 4526 A 4527 � 8 4524 4525 4530 4_29 .37 4525 i 4529 .30 45'28' }� 452.4 ,17 4525 4527 532 S 4531 4530 ,r • 4531 4530 U 4531 4 4611 .sRtrO IE ST 41 B it 4612 4673 4612 m 4613 4612 LO CCA -LC V LPr 10lJ JJ61- INCLUDE 4601 4500 4601 46003 3 4601 x 4uu 47 4600 4602 3 4602 let 4603 .30 4602 3� 4603 3 6 0 4602 4603 46D4 4605 /� 35 4605 46044 $pl 1 605 4604 4605 �7 4606 4507 4606 6 6 ,i 4507 4t 4506 4607 4605 4609 4605 4609 4605 4609 F41 m 4606 4609 46101 4611 4610 c 4611 4610 R 4611 41 4612 4673 4612 m 4613 4612 4610 4611 4614 4615 4614 4615 � 4614 4615 4t 4612 4613 4616 4617 46'16 46T7 4616 46T7 4+ 4613 4615 4675 461S 4618 4619 4619 4E]S 4. 4616 4617 4621 4620 4621 4620 4621 4620 4i 4619 4622 4623 4622 4623 4622 4625 4615 LO CCA -LC V LPr 10lJ JJ61- INCLUDE 7 r PARK W 0 ON KNOLLS 27TH AMMON S2 116`, J5 -Ica & IT. cm 427 CV 7,160 GJ ---- --- S.v 10) MAINAQ MO UMITY EARWHIS IN[ SIP)M PWS- z Ln ill N.T BERG 5 MT IN "UP' '"NING LVI LINES, APIR BEING 19 YtET IN -,% I—c', P.EN.,E .—G-mv, ,.MIGS ­UNN ME As— NM 15 ?6'W MT I V 1. 1... OR .—W .MS ./I R SE , IND -.RRP III L-11% ... IWIN Anderson Engineering ofMiuncsol%��S Cl FIL Efi.ifirsilipa ,xv LAMB BU-1— L000, /9 T., 10MMMIF SIHOMA )IbVd f991 Ik00911\:1( Z front property line, pointing out building placement created the need for a variance. Commission Action: Commissioner Brown moved to recommend Final Development Plan Approval including variance based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Grabiel seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Update on Massing — Cary Teague Staff Presentation Planner Teague addressed the Commission explaining the City Council has asked the Planning Commission to consider ordinance amendments regarding a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) and building height to the ridge line for single - family homes. Planner Teague introduced Mr. Brian Lubben of Collaborative Design, . adding Mr. Lubben was hired to work closely with staff on "massing ". Planner Teague told the Commission Mr. Lubben has prepared a power point presentation with computer modeling of three existing neighborhoods to assist in illustrating how the proposed changes to the Code impact homes in these neighborhoods. Mr. Lubben delivered his presentation. Commission Comments Commissioners acknowledged that the computer modeling presented by Mr. Lubben really helps clear -up issues, adding the program used to create the visual models is incredible and would benefit the City if purchased. Commissioners pointed out Edina is a completely developed community and visual aids would be of great value. Continuing, Commissioners 'stated that at this time the Commission doesn't just want to just "patch up" the ordinance to "control" massing, it wants to do more. Planner Teague reiterated the City Council asked the Commission to consider ordinance amendments regarding floor area ratio (FAR) and building height to ridge line for single family homes. Planner Teague pointed out the current 44Z zoning ordinance has some good tools that already address massing; however, despite current regulations there is still a concern that Edina's ordinance doesn't go far enough. Commissioner Brown asked Planner Teague if there is a time -line on this review process. Planner Teague stated he doesn't believe there's a time -line. Commissioners stressed they want to "get it right ", adding they don't want to prevent growth, but harness it. Chair Lonsbury opened the public testimony, adding at this time his intent is to keep it open. Public Comment Dan Carlson, 6229 Parkwood Road. Mr. Carlson stated he is concerned with the proposed changes to Code, adding in his opinion if these changes are adopted they will be taking away his rights as a property owner. Mr. Carlson said if passed the proposed changes would be dictating that he can't build or rebuild to the size /square footage enjoyed by his neighbors. Mr. Carlson said in his opinion the City Council is discriminating against square footage, adding square footage is what people live in. Concluding, Mr. Carlson stressed that he doesn't want the proposed changes to the existing Code adopted that take away his rights as a property owner. Sandy Carlson, 5304 Oaklawn Avenue told the Commission she lives in an area of change and as a result of recent development she has lost her sunlight and privacy. Ms. Carlson encouraged the Commission to make decisions that take the neighboring properties into account. Ms. Carlson stated for her it's not really about house size, it's about lot size and what is appropriate. Richard Whitbeck, 6128 Brookview Avenue suggested that the Commission look at Minnetonka's ordinance as it relates to massing. He said he believes their Code ties remodeling /rebuilds to a radius (400 feet) or what's present on the same block. This would help all neighborhoods, not just the smaller lot areas. Turk Miroslava, 6141 Brookview Avenue pointed out the Commission should also consider if the remodeling or rebuild "fits" the neighborhood. Mr. Miroslava said on his street there are two homes that haven't sold because they are out of character with the neighborhood. Jackie Whitbeck, 6128 Brookview, told the Commission to also consider the "carbon footprint" of these large homes. Jane Lonnquist, 4510 Drexel Avenue, thanked the Commission for their interest in addressing the issue of massing. A4_3 X Kitty O'Dea, 4610 Bruce Avenue, told the Commission she agrees with the . steps taken thus far to amend the Ordinance to help reduce the impact of new construction or remodeling, adding in her opinion implementing a FAR is a step in the right direction. Ms. Westin, 6136 Brookview Avenue, stated she believes more research is needed on energy and sunlight issues, adding in her opinion "do homes really need to be as large as they are being built ". Ms. Westin stated loss of sunlight can be very detrimental to many people. Ms. Westin pointed out the Schaefer Road /Parkwood Road area is a completely different neighborhood than the Brookview neighborhood and maybe the massing focus should be on neighborhoods. Jay Carlson, 5304 Oaklawn Avenue told the Commission he believes adopting a FAR is a great tool in reducing massing; however, Mr. Carlson added he also believes looking at each neighborhood individually makes the most sense and is the best solution to the issues facing Edina. A discussion ensued with Commissioners in agreement that "massing" and changes to the Code are very important and further discussion and input from staff, Council, Commissioners and the public is necessary. Chair Lonsbury suggested that the pubic testimony be held open until the next Commission meeting on April 30tH Commissioner Grabiel moved to suspend the public testimony until the next meeting of the Planning Commission on April 30, 2008: Commissioner Brown seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Commission Comments Chair Lonsbury thanked members of the audience for their input and directed a question to Planner Teague regarding Minnetonka's ordinance, adding if his memory serves him correctly the Commission considered something similar in the past. Planner Teague responded Chair Lonsbury is correct; however, basing house size on street or radius is difficult, adding that at this time Edina doesn't have information available on the exact size of every house in the City. Chair Lonsbury asked if that is the reason the proposed change is based on lot width. Planner Teague responded that is correct. A discussion ensued with Commissioners pointing out changing Code to include a FAR in their opinion may not be the only tool to control massing. Commissioners pointed out at this time zoning regulations are already in place and amending the Code may not be enough. Commissioners stated Mr. Carlson's point is well taken; that at least in his neighborhood large houses aren't a problem. Expanding on that point it was noted that a conclusion shouldn't be drawn that large houses on small lots are inappropriate; noting the houses in the AN-4 10 Country Club District are large, the lots are small, but in that area those homes "fit "; however, they wouldn't "fit" in-other "small lot" neighborhoods. Commissioners also acknowledged the concern with property values and the assumption that the changes occurring within Edina are only increasing those values, adding that can only go so far. Commissioners stated managing appropriate house size in each neighborhood may be the key. Commissioners stressed that maintaining neighborhood character is the goal; noting in the Comprehensive Plan Character districts were defined. Commissioners acknowledged how the City gets there is the challenge. Continuing, in was also noted that detached garages, teardowns, vs. extensive remodeling, minimal remodeling, grading etc. are also important issues that should be discussed further. Planner Teague noted if the Commission is serious about developing neighborhood districts to regulate massing individual neighborhoods would need to be identified and rezoned. Planner Teague said in his opinion it would be challenging to "draw" neighborhood lines. Commissioner Brown pointed out character districts were already identified in the Comprehensive Plan and that could be a starting point. Commissioner Grabiel suggested that the City solicit help from realtors in defining neighborhoods - if that's the way the City is heading. Chair Lonsbury stated at this time the Commission isn't ready to act on the proposed Code amendments. Chair Lonsbury said in his opinion it would be beneficial if the Commission and Council had a workshop on this issue. Concluding, Chair Lonsbury said the message this evening is that the Commission needs more input before we act. III. INTERGOVERNMENTAL BUSINESS: Chair Lonsbury acknowledged receipt of back of the packet materials. IV. ADJOURNMENT AND ADDITIONAL PUBLIC COMMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 10:00 PM Submitted by A��- 11 �ZNA, o��le ic�R'e6e MINUTE SUMMARY Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, April 30, 2008, 7:00 PM U) Edina City Hall Council Chambers 4801 West 50th Street MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair John Lonsbury, Julie Risser, Nancy Scherer, Kevin Staunton, Steve Brown, Floyd Grabiel and Arlene Forrest MEMBERS ABSENT: Michael Schroeder, Mike Fischer and Katie Sierks STAFF PRESENT: Cary Teague and Jackie Hoogenakker I. APPROVAL OF MINUTE SUMMARY: The minutes of the March 26, 2008, meeting were filed as submitted. II. OLD BUSINESS: Discussion on Massing /Zoning Ordinance Amendment — Cary Teague, Planning Director Staff Presentation Planner Teague addressed the Commission and gave a power point presentation on "Massing ". Planner Teague focused his presentation on establishing a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) and maximum height to the ridge line or top of a roof. Continuing, Planner Teague explained staff proposes FAR to be calculated on a sliding scale on only the front 150 feet of lot depth and FAR shall include only finished floor area above the basement, including garage space. Planner Teague said staff also proposes maximum building height of 35 feet to be measured to the highest point on a roof of a single or double dwelling. The maximum height may be increased by one inch for each foot that the lot exceeds 75 feet in width, and in no event shall the maximum height exceed 40 feet. Planner Teague further explained that any lot 135 feet or wider could have a house 40 feet tall to the top of the roof. Continuing with his presentation Planner A4G Teague highlighted newly constructed houses within the City and how the proposed FAR and height requirement would impact their construction. Concluding, Planner Teague at the direction of the Commission depicted examples of "neighborhoods /districts" as another tool to use to control massing. Comments and Questions from the Commission Commissioner Brown asked Planner Teague to clarify how FAR would be handled if the City were to establish individual "neighborhoods /districts" as an approach to control "massing ". Planner Teague responded that each "neighborhood /district" could have its own FAR; adding if the City identifies "19 neighborhoods or districts" there could possibly be a different FAR for each. Planner Teague pointed out at this time City Code designates all residential lots as R -1 and all R -1 lots are guided by the same requirements except for variations for lot width and lot coverage. Concluding, Planner Teague further explained if the Commission supports establishing neighborhoods /districts each identified neighborhood /district would need to be rezoned. Chair Lonsbury asked Planner Teague if the City were to identify and rezone individual neighborhoods or follows the character districts established in the Comprehensive Plan would the City need to reestablish standards for each neighborhood /district. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Grabiel observed with regard to massing there is the possibility that neighbors the Commission has heard from may be wrong. Commissioner Grabiel stated in his opinion the Commission needs to be careful in restricting redevelopment and new development. Property owners reinvesting in their neighborhoods increase property values, and for the most part that is a good thing. If changes to Code are too restrictive residents may find difficulty in selling their homes when the time comes. A discussion ensued with Commissioners focusing on height as an important tool in controlling massing, and agreeing the suggested change in height is a good tool to implement immediately. Commissioners also noted how the loss of sunlight as a result of construction of overly tall homes can impact neighborhood character and enjoyment. Chair Lonsbury suggested when voting that the proposed Code changes be separated. A V7 E Chair Lonsbury opened the hearing for public comment. Public Comment Mr. Bill Grist, Minneapolis Area Association of Realtors, 5750 Lincoln Drive, addressed the Commission and explained what is important to realtors is to have the correct information available for clients. Mr. Grist pointed out it's been difficult to keep up with current and proposed changes to Edina's Code. He noted someone can purchase a home under one set of rules, only to have them change by closing. Mr. Grist asked the Commission to give the current Code changes time to work before changing them again, reiterating it's been very difficult for the public to keep up with the changes. Commissioner Brown moved to close the public hearing. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye. Commission Action Commissioner Scherer moved to recommend an amendment to City Code 850 regarding building height. The maximum height to the highest point on a roof of a single or double dwelling unit shall be 35 feet. The maximum height may be increased by one inch for each foot that the lots exceeds 75 feet in with. In no event shall the maximum height exceed 40 feet. Commissioner Brown seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Commission Comment Further discussion ensued with Commissioners stating they truly believe a one - size -fit all approach doesn't work. Commissioners also stressed they have no desire to prevent growth in the City, and acknowledged the difficulty in developing and implementing new guidelines. Commissioners however stated that something needs to be done, and new technology could be used as an aid in development and implementation. Commissioners reiterated that in their opinion developing neighborhood districts is the approach that should be implemented to control massing and maintain neighborhood character. Commissioners also acknowledged that reconstruction and new construction will occur during this process, questioning if FAR should be immediately established; however, Commissioners reiterated their opinion that if FAR is established it should be calculated based on individual neighborhood standards. Continuing, Commissioners further indicated FAR should either be tied to a "vicinity or neighborhood character districts" as laid out in the Comprehensive Plan or separate districts should be established and designated. Concluding, Commissioners stated they believe the recommended Code change this evening ��0 3 regarding building height and other recent Code changes will help control massing until separate neighborhoods are defined and /or rezoned. Commission Action Commissioner Staunton moved that the Commission recommend to Council that they not adopt the proposed Code change on FAR as lJin in the staff report and that the Commission further study the use of a vicinity manner and/or the use of FAR as part of character districtfuture rezoning of Code. Commissioner Brown seconded the motio voted aye; motion carried. III. NEW BUSINESS: ssion on Tree Ordinance — Cary Teague, City Planner, Chair Lonsbury su sted that the discussion scheduled on de oping a tree ordinance be held ove or the benefit of absent Commission Continuing, Chair Lonsbury said he Nld like to receive in/kn ntial" tree ordinance from Commissio Schroeder who geable on this subject. Commissioners agre with the sugg Chair. Commissioner Scherer moved to le the da tree ordinance. Commissioner Brown seconded the otion e; motion carried. IV. INTERGOVERNMENTAL BUST Chair Lonsbury told the Commission Commission liaison to the Heritage F has graciously volunteered t/serry elect Arlene Forrest as ComAll voted aye; motion carried Forrest. N cy Sch er will no longer serve as servation rd, adding Arlene Forrest as HPB liaison. hair Lonsbury moved to Liaison to the He ge Preservation Board. Lonsbury congratul d Commissioner Chair Lonsbury acknowlVged back of packet materials, espe 'ally the training materials prepared byy5mpbell Knutson. Commissioner Gra>Tel told the Commission he experienced a fasc sting zoning board meeting la Thursday and suggested if zoning items are app sled to Council that th ommission is kept abreast of what occurs at the C ncil level. Commissione Grabiel suggested that the monthly zoning board sum ary indicate if a tem was appealed. Planner Teague said to date the City has not received variance appeals in the month of April; stating Commissioner A41 M RESOLUTION No. 2008- Improving the Approval Process for Re- development in Residential Areas Whereas, Edina City Council is committed to deciding on re- development proposals in the residential neighborhoods in the way preserving their stability and quality of life of their residents; Whereas, residents routinely dedicate tremendous amount of time to strategize the defense of their neighborhoods against pending proposals; Whereas, increased traffic in residential neighborhoods compromises safety, and creates unhealthy environment; Whereas, many changes in the design after the public hearing can be preempted by accommodating the feedback from the affected residents early. in the design stage; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Edina City Council expects the applicants to develop their proposals: • engaging the affected residents starting from the conceptual stage; • including the measures mitigating the impact on the residents'e new sources of noise, safety perils and pollution; • locating motor vehicle gateways outside of the residential areas; • accepting a particular share of the future assessments for the infrastructure rebuilding (road and underground utilities) in the affected area; • declaring the limits of non - residential uses, above which a complete new approval process should be conducted, without using the previously approved limit as the baseline TO: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: June 3, 2008 AGENDA ITEM IV. A. ITEM .DESCRIPTION: Two - Truck Boxes for two new tandem snowplow trucks, including hydraulics and snowplow equipment. Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. J -Craft Truck Equipment. (State of Minnesota Contract # 1. $187,256.82 437050) RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: J -Craft Truck Equipment $187,256.82 GENERAL INFORMATION: This purchase is for two truck boxes, hydraulics and snowplow equipment for two 2007 replacement snowplow trucks. The trucks and chassis were ordered in December and replace Units 25.314 and 25.317, which will go to auction this fall with the proceeds going back to the equipment replacement budget. This purchase is through the State of, Minnesota purchasing program. The units will be funded through the Public Works Equipment Replacement Fund. i The Recommended Bid is within budget Public Works ' Depart rt r�ent y not within udg J16h W n or on Hughes, City Anager G:\ Engineering \Administration \CORRP\N\RFP - Equipment Attachments\20080603 rip dump boxes.doc Finance Director TO: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: June 3, 2008 AGENDA ITEM IV. B. ITEM DESCRIPTION: New Well House No. 3, 5233 Halifax Avenue: Contract No. PW 08 -5; Improvement No. WM-483 Comaanv 1. EnComm Midwest, Inc. 2. Hunerberg Construction Company 3. American Liberty Construction, Inc. 4. Magney Construction, Inc. 5. Municipal Builders, Inc. 6. Ricelake Construction Group RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: EnComm Midwest, Inc. Amount of Quote or Bid $ 328,328.00 $ 330,200.00 $ 339,700.00 $ 372,273.00 $ 377,559.00 $ 379,660.00 $ 328,328.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project is for the pump house for Well No. 3. The well construction was awarded last fall to Bergerson- .Caswell, Inc. The status of the well is now complete. Staff has met with the adjoining neighbors regarding this project, see attached copy of the elevations for this building. Originally staff had proposed a fenced -in area to place roll -off dumpsters for capturing street sweeping material that is temporary stored (about twice a year) at this location. The neighbors did not want the added fenced -in area; therefore, staff has eliminated this from the plan. As you can see from the attached temporary . street sweeping stockpile map that staff needs this area to be efficient (green) with our operations. Staff will be working with the two adjoining neighbors once the building is constructed regarding placement of new landscaping. This project is in the Capital Improvement Plan, which allocated $500,000 for this project. The cost of the well rehabilitation is $66,775.00, therefore the total construction cost for this project is $395,103.00 plus the landscaping costs. The water utility fund will fund this improvement. Staff recommends awarding the project to EnComm Midwest, Inc., since EnComm Midwest, Inc. has completed a number of projects satisfactorily for the City. Signature The Recommended Bid is X within budget not within Gordon Hughes, GAEngineering\Contract Numbers\2008 \PW 08.5 New Well House No. 3.5233 HalifaAADMIN\MISC\PW 08-5 RFP.doc Public Works — Utility n, Finance Director 4Z4 low ,R Pm VIEW T:RCIM ►4ALIFAX SKYLIGNT METAL LOWER Pp - `IT SKYLIGHT ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOFING Ix CEDAR TRIM — �GTBET1,9EN y - I IcV/W -TYP. (STAIN) FIBER CEMENT — SIDING u✓ 6' 4 8' EXP0WRE 3 EAST ELEVATION 3/10 - 11 -0' ASPHALT SHINGLE CEDAR 51L4KE$ ROOFING -STAIN 4 NORTH ELEVATION 3/16, - 11 -0' fig OERTEL ARCHITECTS 1795 Saint Clair Avenue St. Paul. Minnesota 55105 (6511696-5186 T.1 (65N bW5188 F- aarslarthileaa [n NWE EDINA WELLHOUSE #3 EDINA, MN re iswm. APRIL 14, 200! Tit Em cola er. .0.0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF /qMINNESOTA sc �,drvaLav APRIL 14, 200! I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCVMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED ARCHITECT IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA ATE APRIL 4f, 3000 ■OW s,¢n wrc ELEVATIONS ­T.aA4 jp rl=I ��tt�t�t�o�� �s� •••- mac+■ ■i> ■tt�t� tel���� ���i41���t�t�l� �t� �t�� 0■ �0����� �Y`■ If�tt�IG ■�1 1����1 ��7� ■R��O�L:IZ ■����� -.•r� -.•r r••- -urn PREFINISkED CLAD C4NCRETE BL= CONCRETE BLOCK • r• BLOCK •rr WINDOW ELEVATION ELEVATION O © SKYLIGNT METAL LOWER Pp - `IT SKYLIGHT ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOFING Ix CEDAR TRIM — �GTBET1,9EN y - I IcV/W -TYP. (STAIN) FIBER CEMENT — SIDING u✓ 6' 4 8' EXP0WRE 3 EAST ELEVATION 3/10 - 11 -0' ASPHALT SHINGLE CEDAR 51L4KE$ ROOFING -STAIN 4 NORTH ELEVATION 3/16, - 11 -0' fig OERTEL ARCHITECTS 1795 Saint Clair Avenue St. Paul. Minnesota 55105 (6511696-5186 T.1 (65N bW5188 F- aarslarthileaa [n NWE EDINA WELLHOUSE #3 EDINA, MN re iswm. APRIL 14, 200! Tit Em cola er. .0.0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF /qMINNESOTA sc �,drvaLav APRIL 14, 200! I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCVMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED ARCHITECT IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA ATE APRIL 4f, 3000 ■OW s,¢n wrc ELEVATIONS ­T.aA4 11 It 1 0 1; \`� — — _ _ _ _ — — — 1 1t1 t __J/ 1 I 11 t( 1 i� 1' 11 i i �i 11 1 1 1 1 i HOUSE i I 1 11 1 5229 1 0 REPAIR AIL DISTURBED ' AREAS 11 'I 11 Q 11 � 11 J 11 Q 11 2 11 V CLASS 5 BASE 0 AREAS TO RECEIVE BIT "NODS (4wo S.F.) — BITUMINOUS WORK PERFORMED BY OMWER SITE PLAN w Is '301-0 NORTH RlL N6Ntm5 -6] -]666 OF NOTEs HOUSE FINAL BLDG. LOCATION TO N DETMNED BY PI LOCATION OF EXISTING W&L, ICOMMENCEMENT OF WORK 1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — --- O 3 10 Q OERTEL ARCHITECTS 1795 Saint Clair Avenue S, Paul, Minnesota 55105 (e5q 696 -5186 Td 10 696-5188 F. mt.ludulm. ono,rr., Rwc EDINA WELLHOUSE #3 EDINA, MN iW[CI NNISM: ot5-oa rz ,� nPwL 11, zoos �. TRS 0%4 JLO DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA arz APRIL 14, 2005 15047 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED ARCHITECT IN THE 5TATE OF MINNESOTA arz APRIL U, 2005 ISSIO SITE PLAN ��A1 7 I, I WD, GE� L 11 OF NOTEs HOUSE FINAL BLDG. LOCATION TO N DETMNED BY PI LOCATION OF EXISTING W&L, ICOMMENCEMENT OF WORK 1 — — — — — — — — — — — — — --- O 3 10 Q OERTEL ARCHITECTS 1795 Saint Clair Avenue S, Paul, Minnesota 55105 (e5q 696 -5186 Td 10 696-5188 F. mt.ludulm. ono,rr., Rwc EDINA WELLHOUSE #3 EDINA, MN iW[CI NNISM: ot5-oa rz ,� nPwL 11, zoos �. TRS 0%4 JLO DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA arz APRIL 14, 2005 15047 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED ARCHITECT IN THE 5TATE OF MINNESOTA arz APRIL U, 2005 ISSIO SITE PLAN ��A1 City of Edina Sweeping and Temp Stock Piles As f- Temp Stock Piles Sweeping Routes N w +E S Engineering Dept May, 2008 TO: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: June 3, 2008 AGENDA ITEM IV. C. ITEM DESCRIPTION: 2008 Morningside Water main Lining Project: Contract No. ENG 08 -5; Improvement No. WM-481 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Insituform Technologies USA, Inc. $ 1,238,974.00 2. J. Fletcher Creamer & Son, Inc. $ 1,548,917.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Insituform Technologies USA, Inc. $ 1,238,974.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project includes relining the water mains north of West 42nd Street, which includes Lynn Avenue, Kipling Avenue, Grimes Avenue, and Inglewood Avenue, see attached map. This is the first phase of upgrading water mains in the Morningside Neighborhood. Other phases will be proposed with pavement rehabilitation that will be brought forward in 2012 to 2014. The proposed rehabilitation is a structural liner called PRP Thermopipe manufactured by Insituform. This liner meets all federal standards for potable water use. This project is in the Capital Improvement Plan, which allocated $480,000 for this phase. This estimate was based on cement lining of the pipes, which is a similar process that City of Minneapolis uses (the actual cost to cement line the pipes would be approximately $700,000). This process does not provide additional longevity of the pipe. Staff analyzed projects that have been bid and ones that are close to bidding and find we are below the estimated CIP by $1,300,000 for the years 2008 -2012, see attached worksheet. Staff also analyzed other methods for rehabilitating the watermain and feel that this method is the most feasible method to quickly line these pipes. Funding for this project will be funded by the current watermain fund. However, water customers within the Morningside Neighborhood that obtain water from City of Minneapolis are paying almost the same rate that Minneapolis charges the City of Edina. The meter charge for this area generates approximately $18,000 per year. It is difficult to rehabilitate the system without any substantial up- charge for future capital improvements. To help defray these costs, staff will have our water rate consultant reanalyze the rates for the Minneapolis water users this fall for a potential increase in 2009. Staff recommends awarding this project to Insituform Technologies USA, Inc. Signature The Recommended Bid is within budget 4 not withiia buddlet Hughes, GAEngineeringlContract Numbers12008%ENG 08 -5 Momingside WM - Pipe ReliningWDMINWSMENG 08-5 RFP.doc Public Works - Engineering Department n)Khflin, Finance Director nager Q/ U L� TO: Mayor & City Council REQUEST FOR PURCHASE FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: June 3, 2008 AGENDA ITEM IV. C. ITEM DESCRIPTION: 2008 Morningside Water main Lining Project: Contract No. ENG 08 -5; Improvement No. WM-481 Company Amount of Quote or Bid 1. Insituform Technologies USA, Inc. $ 1,238,974.00 2. J. Fletcher Creamer & Son, Inc. $ 1,548,917.00 RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Insituform Technologies USA, Inc. $ 1,238,974.00 GENERAL INFORMATION: This project includes relining the water mains north of West 42nd Street, which includes Lynn Avenue, Kipling Avenue, Grimes Avenue, and Inglewood Avenue, see attached map. This is the first phase of upgrading water mains in the Morningside Neighborhood. Other phases will be proposed with pavement rehabilitation that will be brought forward in 2012 to 2014. The proposed rehabilitation is a structural liner called PRP Thermopipe manufactured by Insituform. This liner meets all federal standards for potable water use. This project is in the Capital Improvement Plan, which allocated $480,000 for this phase. This estimate was based on cement lining of the pipes, which is a similar process that City of Minneapolis uses (the actual cost to cement line the pipes would be approximately $700,000). This process does not provide additional longevity of the pipe. Staff analyzed projects that have been bid and ones that are close to bidding and find we are below the estimated CIP by $1,300,000 for the years 2008 -2012, see attached worksheet. Staff also analyzed other methods for rehabilitating the watermain and feel that this method is the most feasible method to quickly line these pipes. Funding for this project will be funded by the current watermain fund. However, water customers within the Morningside Neighborhood that obtain water from City of Minneapolis are paying almost the same rate that Minneapolis charges the City of Edina. The meter charge for this area generates approximately $18,000 per year. It is difficult to rehabilitate the system without any substantial up- charge for future capital improvements. To help defray these costs, staff will have our water rate consultant reanalyze the rates for the Minneapolis water users this fall for a potential increase in 2009. Staff recommends awarding this project to Insituform Technologies USA, Inc. Signature The Recommended Bid is within budget 4 not withiia buddlet Hughes, GAEngineeringlContract Numbers12008%ENG 08 -5 Momingside WM - Pipe ReliningWDMINWSMENG 08-5 RFP.doc Public Works - Engineering Department n)Khflin, Finance Director nager t LEGEND HYDRANT REPLACEMENT WATE_RMAIN LINING • 40TH ST W o f00 200 ]00 I i.7- - I � _ ..`. I .,. ! IIt.. ,1. - J • I41ST ST w 1 �1 • w r "" ,tea• �mm THM no RiCR1EENS•MtMCTS•PUWIJ8IS 2m WATERMAN LINING PROJECT DINA MINNESOTA WATERMWNLINING 1401p.00D -- -- - _ --_ -- naa..••c.. OF 6 SHEETS Project Country Club Well No. 7 Water Treatment Plant No. 5 Neighborhood Recons Morningside Water Pipe Lining CIP UTILITY ANALYSIS 2007 -2012 Est. / Bid 7,740,872.00 $ 6,683,000.00 $ 618,362.00 $ 1,238,974.00 $ 464,607.00 $ Cost 8,504,000.00 $ 60,000.00 $ 7,600,000.00 $ 1,000,000.00 $ 480,000.00 $ 450,000.00 $ Difference 60,000.00 917,000.00 381,638.00 (758,974.00) (14,607.00) 1,348,185.00 Note: This analysis only covers anticipated substantial differences than what is listed in the CIP 20080530 CIP Analysis.xls 11:36 AM 5/30/2008 To: Mayor & City Council From: Debra Mangen City Clerk Date: June 3, 2008 Subject: Resolution Receiving Donations Recommendation: Adopt Resolution. REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item V.A. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Info /Background: In order to comply with State Statutes all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -51 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA City of Edina WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Donations to the Edina Art Center: Diana Lee Lucker $100.00 Nancy T. & Theodore S. Grant $25.00 Donation to the Edina Park Department: Edina Community Foundation Made possible by a gift from Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community Dated: June 3, 2008 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) Memorial In honor of Bill Smeltz Memorial In honor of Bill Smeltz Two AED Defibrillators For Edinborough Park James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 3, 2008 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 �0LIE •f� v • To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: BOB WILSON CITY ASSESSOR Date: JUNE 3, 2008 Subject: REPORT BY BOARD OF APPEAL AND EQUALIZATION REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item V.B. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ® Discussion Information /Background: There is nothing included in the packet. Mr. John Helling, Chair, of the 2008 Board of Appeal and Equalization will give a verbal presentation. To: Mayor & City Council From: Gordon Hughes City Manager Date: June 3, 2008 Subject: BETF Presentation Interlachen Trail Bike Lanes /Sidewalk REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item V.C. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA To Council Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance xDiscussion Recommendation: Receive recommendations from BETF and direct staff Info /Background: Representatives of the Bike Edina Task Force (BETF) will attend the June 3, meeting for the purpose of discussing a modification of the plan for the Interlachen trail. BETF would like the Council's authorization to submit this plan to the Metropolitan Council (specifically the Technical Advisory Committee) in order to request that the previously awarded grant for the trail be applied to build the modified plan. The attached correspondence from BETF details their request. May 28, 2008 Dear Mayor Hovland, and Council Members Bennett, Housh, Masica and Swenson; It has been brought to the attention of BETE that the grant for the Interlachen Bike - Pedestrian project has a sunset date of June 2009. The $1.5 -million previously approved for the project will be lost unless a revised plan is submitted to and approved by the Transportation Advisory Board of the Metropolitan Council. As you may recall the Engineering Department identified Interlachen Boulevard as a route of high importance to cyclists and pedestrians. They created a plan for a bike- pedestrian facility and were awarded the grant. Neighbors concerned about the loss of trees and the safety of the side path design convinced the City Council to vote against the project in. the form that it was submitted. We have met with. Karl Orn of the TAB and he has encouraged us to submit a redesign for consideration. He feels there is a reasonable chance of keeping the grant as long as the following conditions are met - the facility must be on Interlachen Blvd., the starting point and finish must remain as defined in the original proposal, and both pedestrians and bike traffic must be accommodated. Times have changed since that vote 2 years ago. There are more and more requests to improve access for cyclists and pedestrians in Edina, but as a fully developed suburb we have been unable to offer much improvement for cyclists. As the price of gasoline is approaching $4 per gallon, with little indication that it will ever retreat, we need to look seriously at the options we have for alternative transportation. Interlachen is the major connector to the Cedar Lake Trail system for the northwest area of Edina; and already has a moderate amount of bike traffic. The bike plan produced by BETF has a suggested redesign that would meet the requirements of the TAB, and also address the safety concerns and the loss of trees that led to the rejection of the first plan. The redesign would not enlarge the footprint of the road, would not involve assessments to the homeowners or lead to the loss of trees. We would like to recommend the following road diet approach - narrowing the driving lanes to 10.5 feet to allow for a oneway bike lane on each shoulder, and the creation of a pedestrian component on the south side currently occupied by the powerline. Staff time for the submission of this revision should be kept to a minimum as the TAB does not require a highly detailed engineering document for its deliberations. Thank you for your willingness to reconsider this :project. Sincerely yours, .j Alice Hulbert for BETF EDEN AVENUE Eden Avenue is a comfortable biking street, and is a more inviting option for connecting Vernon Avenue to 50th Street than travelling over those streets near Highway 100. It provides good access to Grandview Square and is a. potential access point for the recommended Regional Canadian Pacific Trail. A Park and Ride Facility between Vernon and Eden is in early phases of concept development. RECONIh1ENDED TREATMENTS SHORT % IMMEDIATE TERM • Sign the route using recommended design • Delineate right edge of driving lane ( "fog line ") to limit automobile displacement. Driving lanes should be 10 ft wide • Stripe two 6 k wide (minimum) bicycle lanes MEDIUM TO LONG TERM • Consider application of colored pavement to mark bike lanes • Consider installation of integral bike lane - gutter pan INTERLAACHEN BOULEVARD Interlachen Boulevard presently provides an uncomfortable environment for cyclists. High vehicle speeds, lack of bicycle Facilities, and poor condition of shoulders work against use of this important route. A configuration accommodating cyclists and pedestrians on an 8 ft sidewalk (proposed by others) was recently rejected by the Edina City Council as it created hazardous conditions and did not meet recommended practice. fiEcCi,AVOE?NDED TR .,4TMErJTS SHORT / IMMEDIATE TERM • Repair shoulders • Decrease width of automobile travel lanes to 1.0.5 feet • Sign the route using recommended design • Stripe two 6 ft bike lanes on paved shoulders Deteriorated roadway shoulders present a hazardous condition for cyclists along Inter }oche» Boulevard. Two potential cross- sections for interlachen Boulevard: Alternative A: Space for cyclists and automobiles within the existing roadway. .. r,; MEDIUM TERM TO LONGER TERM — --- • — Consider installation of integral bike lane- gurter pan curbs AlternaVY2 B: Space for cyclists, pedestrians and automobiles. • Provide pedestrian facilities on one or both sides of the road. .nd Without the inherent safety problems at crossings. ROAD NARRO'W'ING OR LANE NARROWING It's commonly assumed that Bike Lanes, wider sidewalks and other improvements for bicyclists and pedestrians will require wider roads and more right -of -way. Experience in Minnesota and elsewhere, however, shows that significant improvements can be made without widening the current roadway. By re- striping travel lanes or reducing the number of travel lanes (often called a "road diet "), pedestrian and bicyclist needs can be accommodated without widening the street. There traffic volumes allow, consideration should be given to reducing travel lanes from four to three lanes, using a center turn lane to allow space for bike lanes on both sides of the street. Reducing travel lane widths to 11 feet or lower (which in some cases require a variance from local, county or state officials), especially on streets with four or more lanes, can make room for bike lanes. Even if enough space for a regulation bike lane can't be made available, simply having a wider curb lane can significantly improve the cycling environment. Many U.S. cities (including Boulder, Portland, and Chicago) have reduced lane widths on urban arrerials to 10 feet in order to add space for bicyclists. SIGNS Distance /Destination signs, which provide information about distance to particular destinations, are an effective way to promote walking and biking and should be considered as part of any bikeway or walkway project. UNDERRASSES Although this Plan elsewhere recommends replacement of the underpass under Fork Avenue, in general underpasses are not recommended where suitable at -grade crossings are feasible. When underpasses are necessary, they should be designed . and constructed in a way that allows maximum light to shine in, and the entrances should be clearly visible from the street level. These measures will reduce personal safety concerns. (See Bridges /Overpasses). Min.imi.Zing the slope will increase safety and convenience. Bike route sign in Poi-Vand. Oregon. underposses should by designed to be ,veil -lit, open and comfortable. 112 1 THE CITY OF EDiINA COMPREHENSIVE BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION PLAN a ID lie go slim A.7 City of Chicago sample bicycle lane design The City of Chicago has several years of experience providing on -street bike lanes on relatively narrow streers. A sample design for a 30 ft wide street, incorporating 10 ft wide automobile travel lanes and 5 ft wide bike lanes is included here. A set of Chicago's standard bike lane designs can be downloaded From the City, of Chicago's websi.te.at: lutpa /e gov.cityofchic,ago.o rg/ webpoa• tal lCOCVlebPorral /COC_EDITORIAL /bi ke_lane.pdf Bike Lane on 2 -way Street With No Parking on Both Sides City of Chicago Richard ]d. Daley, lkiyor DERUM. TENT OF IR-kNSPORT -MON Migu i d' &cola Cnmmis_b'Rer RL P.S.a' or MV-1 -1c U:m.!J • :rib., -.ki, Il.at:• •':cn,F..:,uc NOTE: Measured curbface to curbface. Bike Lane Thermoplastic pavement marking line 8" [200mrn) wide solid white No Parking Strip: Pre - formed Inlay Tape marking line 4" 1100mm) wide solid yellow NOTE: Apply to top of curb Bike Lane Symbol & Arrow Pre-cut plastic NOTE: Bike tare and parking stri pes remain continuous when passing alley and driveway entrances. C I T Y O F C H I C A G O Bike Lane with No Parking 1_Wta-3 5..10-02 scua V=310' !ttTrY!Y9�ie Wiif3 ^mlp: :ldrv4'Ai:iL'afY2+r "E'Y'!h? eM:t _ �T _ THE CIT'i Cr EDINA. COMPREHENSIVE BICYCLE TRANSPCRTA.TIO "i PLAN 1 I17 REPORT, To: Mayor & City Council From: Cary Teague City Planner Date: June 3, 2008 Subject: Set Hearing Date for D1R Architects/Tom Miller for 3201and 310169th Street W Edina, MN Recommendation: COMMENDATION Agenda Item: V. D.1. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action: ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Set Hearing Date for the June 17, 2008, City Council Meeting for revised Final Development plan, Revised Conditional Use Permit and Lot Division approval for 3101 & 320169th Street West, DJR Architects /Tom Miller. Information/Background: See attached Plans. II% r, ;I i _� — • .� �: ,•. 0 Lark n TE Miller landscape uo�an archirec!ure .�.,......+..,.... arrogp Development, LLC n �t R 70 Y R50�'� ooe PQR�g� u DJR ARCHfTECTURE INC. FACT SHEET WHAT York Place is a proposed redevelopment project comprised of three buildings; two retail buildings, and a market rate apartment building. LOCATION Edina, Minnesota TYPE Four -story stick framed and one -story steel framed construction STYLE Contemporary Classic HEIGHT 1 story for the retail buildings,4 stories for apartment building RETAIL Total of 18,000 gross square feet. One building is 12,750 gross square feet. The second building is 5,250 gross square feet. RESIDENTIAL UNITS 114 market -rate apartments UNIT SIZES Units are 590 - 1200 SF AMENITIES York Place East provides the following amenities: East Interior Court Community Room Exercise Room Generous Balconies Underground climate controlled parking with direct elevator access to residential lobby Roof Deck CONSTRUCTION York Place expects to start construction in the summer of 2008 with approximate completion during TIMEFRAME summer 2009 SITE PHOTO c '4 r t I K 4a �i ' 1b 4, Larkin f]�� TE Miller landrscape Ho oR`NEYf Development, LLC �rrhieciu e DEVELOPMENTTEAM Owner /Developer: T E Miller Development, LLC York Place is owned and developed by Tom and Robb Miller of T E Miller Development. Tom Miller formed T E Miller Development 2003. For the thirty five years prior to that he owned REM, Inc. During that time REM owned and leased over 1,100 properties in 17 sta, and primarily focused on healthcare services. When REM was sold in May of 2003, they had 14,000 employees and served over 10,000 consumers. T E Miller Development is focused on owning and managing premiere properties across the United States. In keeping with that focus, York Place will be managed by Robb Miller and Mike Garvin of T E Miller Development. At present,T E Miller Development owns 1,425 rental units and over 85,000 feet of commercial office space. Tom Miller was a resident of Edina for over 20 years and holds a Masters Degree in Urban & Regional Studies and has been a Real Estate Broker for over 25 years. Robb Miller received his JD /MBA degree from the University of St. Thomas in the Spring of 2006. After passing the bar exam, Robb worked in the real estate department of Target Corporation for a year before joining T.E. Miller Development in the Fall of 2007. Robb's focus is the development of retail and multi - family projects. Architect: DJR Architecture, Inc. Specializing in Architecture, Urban Design and Planning, DJR Architecture is a mid - sized, Minneapolis -based firm focused on crafting inspired places for live,work,and play. Over the course of its twenty three year history, DJR has emerged as one of the area's leading firms in all segments of the housing market, particularly those that include a mixed -use component. Civil Engineer: Landscape Architect: Consulting Attorney TAX SUMMARY Sunde Engineering, PLLC Close Landscape Architecture Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren, Ltd. York Place will bring a significant increase in Tax Revenues to the City of Edina. The 2005 Property Taxes on the two existing properties was approximately $47,000 each building or $94,000 Total. Based on estimated calculations, the total estimated Property Taxes for York Place are projected at $586,800. Estimated Calculations: Retail= 18,000 S.F. x $200 per foot= $3.6 million x 3.0 % tax rate = $108,000 Residential = 114 units x $140,000 per unit = $15.96 million x 3.0 % tax rate = $478,800 • PL Edina, Minnesota April 28 , 1 08 Sheet DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Compatible in use and scale with surrounding properties,York Place, located at the southeast corner of 69th Street and York Avenue, is a thoughtfully conceived redevelopment proposal that brings together shopping, living and working environments to both enhance the commercial district, and create a transition to lower density neighborhoods. Blending 18,000 square feet of retail (York Place West) with 114 apartments (York Place East), the development harmoniously integrates residential and non - residential uses. York Place East brings high quality multi - family housing to the Greater Southdale area by offering 114 units of market rate apartments. Life Cycle Housing York Place instigates positive movement within the life -cycle housing that serves two significant demographic sectors of the Edina community. By developing much needed high quality market rate housing within easy access of a highly desirable shopping and business district, the project provides seniors with inviting alternatives to their single - family homes. This movement in turn allows additional housing options for younger individuals and families by providing ownership opportunities through the resale of single family residences within the greater community. Maxfield Research estimates that 80% of the overall residents will come from Edina and the surrounding area. Sustainable As a redevelopment project, York Place will reuse and reclaim valuable land resources rather than using additional land. The project makes use of the following sustainable design practices: Site Design Significantly reduces existing impervious surface Reduces urban heat island effect by providing new green space Creates potential for pedestrian and bicycle accessibility Provides a green residential courtyard at the interior of the site with plantings and pervious paving Stormwater Management Protects surface and ground water supplies through the use of BMP's Minimizes possibility of periodic flooding through increase in pervious surface materials Employs a grey water system that captures and recycles rainwater for irrigation Building Design Provides a Green Terrace Deck on the roof of the apartment building Incorporates energy efficient products and systems to minimize energy use Utilizes building materials, such as paints with low V.O.C:s (volatile organic compounds), that are recognized in the industry for sustainability Compatible Designed to be compatible in use and scale with the surrounding properties,York Place sits between two blocks with distinctly differ- ent characteristics. To the west lies the commercial district anchored on the southwest corner by the Westin Edina Galleria. To the east lies the City boundary, marked by the single family residences of Richfield. York Place bridges those distinctions with a coherent urban design that makes use of a unified and compelling architectural profile to make the transition. The project enhances the commercial district by creating a dynamic focus for a major node within the district. To further reinforce the commercial district, ground level retail has been introduced at York Avenue. The retail has been placed at the street edge to encourage a closer relationship between storefronts and streetscapes. The project preserves the pedestrian scale through the use of patios and clearly defined activity spaces at the street level. Larkin TE Miller landscape architecture „.N. Ho ATTa OR�ers Development, LLC At the interior of the site,the space between the buildings contains a residential courtyard with a putting green.The landscaped,open space between the two buildings provides a transition buffer from retail to residential use. The final step in the transition to the single - family residential block takes place on Xerxes Avenue, where the installation of new walkways improves pedestrian circulation and landscaping provides a front lawn to match the front lawns across the street. The apartment building is set back 35'from the east property line and there is another 120'from that point to the neighboring single - family residences. In particular,York Place: Integrates residential and non - residential uses Provides ground level retail that positions York Avenue as a comfortable pedestrian street Encourages pedestrian accessibility to and among developments by creating a vibrant streetscape Reduces setbacks from public street rights of way to encourage a closer relationship between storefronts and streetscapes Opens potential for pedestrian and bicycle accessibility by creating an appropriate scale at street frontage Offers an imaginative approach to the development of multi - family housing options Uses increased development density to provide a wider range of housing that supports a live- work -play land use Places higher density development within context of other planned commercial districts in the City and the Greater South - dale Area that have higher intensity uses Reduces vehicle trips and miles by providing housing closer to live- work -shop area Improves the feasibility of mass transit by combining uses and density In almost every aspect of its design, the York Place development supports the objectives of the City of Edina as specified in Section 850.01 of the City Code along with the proposed goals of the Greater Southdale Study. By incorporating those objectives into its design, the project corresponds with the code and the capacity it has to enhance the quality of the human and physical environment. Edina, Minnesota Proiect Description i April 106-0095.3 F 3] DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. r I, �I I Retail Above • Property Line RESIDENTIAL GARAGE GROSS AREA 51,310 SF 139 TOTAL PARKING STALLS 0 20 40 60 100 N ' Larkin TE Miller landscape a! h r r t' r� u, ...w.,r.,.•..o .. Hoffinan NNevs D e v e l o p m e n t L L C � I 1 Property Line i I I I I Rol i Edina, Minnesota i 2008 , 1 Floor • ' 106-0095.3 [4] D I J R W Z W Q Y Cr O Parking Summary Parking Requirements PCB -3 parking requirements iWnll nwrn drad Prn ki A 8 per 1000 of Commercial Residential Total I.." Stab Stalls 15 GARAGE Total 139 139 1 113 19 (GUEST) 132 114 139 Guest Parldrg 2 Totals 113 159 271 Parking Requirements PCB -3 parking requirements iWnll nwrn drad Prn ki A 8 per 1000 of 8 Residential: 4 Story 8 per 1000 of (2,OOOof - 15,OOO" 84 Gross SF 5 per 1000 sf (15,000 at and above) 15 Gross SF Total 107 113 Residential ked Provided 1 per urdt (1. 5 per urits over 1500 at) 114 139 Guest Parldrg 2 19 Total 114 158 Net Eotal parldrig required 221 271 Building Summary Larkin TE Miller landscape 110 ArroRan Osvelopment, L L C I , :, , _, ,.... Y WEST 69TH STREET Edina, Minnesota April i i r! 106-0095.3 F5] W 0 Z W Q W X cc W X DJR. Commercial Residential: 4 Story Below grade parking Laud Gross SF Gross SF Units Gross SF Gangs 51,310 GSF 1 18,000 at 33,800 sf 27 2 33,510 sf 29 3 33,510 sf 29 a j 33,510 sf 29 Totals 18,000 GW 134,330 GSF 1 114 1 51,310 GSF Larkin TE Miller landscape 110 ArroRan Osvelopment, L L C I , :, , _, ,.... Y WEST 69TH STREET Edina, Minnesota April i i r! 106-0095.3 F5] W 0 Z W Q W X cc W X DJR. f- RTU screen RETAIL BUILDING A RTU screen 0 20 40 60 100 N Larkn TE Miller landscape C!�1�'�l arch 1 r e c r u r e ter...... Ho ArTORq, D e v e I a p m e n t, L L C ■ ■ Edina, Minnesota April i 2008 2nd 4th Floor • ' 106-0095.3 F 6] - 1 6.04 DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. 1a1 2nd 3n1 41h TOTAL % STUDIO 550 SF 2 2 2 2 B 7% 1 SM1 BA 710$70 SF 16 18 18 18 64 58% 1 BR,41 BA 890 -970 SF 2 3 3 3 11 10% 2 BW 2 RA 1110 -1200 SF 7 7 7 7 28 24.5% 2 BR,/2 BA 1310 SF 0 1 1 1 3 2.5% 27 29 29 29 114 100% 145 hedroonn IDW 33.510 gro of i Moor 0 20 40 60 100 N Larkn TE Miller landscape C!�1�'�l arch 1 r e c r u r e ter...... Ho ArTORq, D e v e I a p m e n t, L L C ■ ■ Edina, Minnesota April i 2008 2nd 4th Floor • ' 106-0095.3 F 6] - 1 6.04 DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. VC i. a -18 = ® eae�_ w Z N X 09 W - x ' Ilw N t APPROXIMATE SCA4[ 0• f 00' Larkin TE Miller landscape •i r; h i! e r T u+ P ..W�.,.��.,...., -• �O AfTOR D e v e l o p m e n t L L C Weekday PM peak hour Levels of service Saturday Mid -Day peak hour Levels of service Current development plan: -Retail. 18,000 sq.ft. GFA total area. - Residential. 114 market -rate residential apartment dwelling units. Previous development plan used for traffic analysis in report dated February 2007: - Retail. 45,974 sq.ft.GFA total area, of which 39,000 sq.ft.GFA was for active retail space and 6,974 sq.ft. was for lobby, entry, and building services. - Residential. 85 market -rate residential aparments. Based on the preceding differences in development characteristics, the trip generation for the current plan is less intense than the former plan during both the weekday p.m. peak hour and the Saturday mid -day peak hour, as presented in the following table: Weekday PM Peak Hour and Saturday Mid -day Peak Hour Trip Generation for Current Proposed Development Plan, as Compared to Previous Proposed Plan LEGEND N Saturday Mid - INTERSECTION LOS Peak Hour STOP CONTROL LOS Tri s XIX 2009 NO- BUILD0009 BUILD APPno>UMAiESCALE Unit") 011 1aa Out eae�_ w Z N X 09 W - x ' Ilw N t APPROXIMATE SCA4[ 0• f 00' Larkin TE Miller landscape •i r; h i! e r T u+ P ..W�.,.��.,...., -• �O AfTOR D e v e l o p m e n t L L C Weekday PM peak hour Levels of service Saturday Mid -Day peak hour Levels of service Current development plan: -Retail. 18,000 sq.ft. GFA total area. - Residential. 114 market -rate residential apartment dwelling units. Previous development plan used for traffic analysis in report dated February 2007: - Retail. 45,974 sq.ft.GFA total area, of which 39,000 sq.ft.GFA was for active retail space and 6,974 sq.ft. was for lobby, entry, and building services. - Residential. 85 market -rate residential aparments. Based on the preceding differences in development characteristics, the trip generation for the current plan is less intense than the former plan during both the weekday p.m. peak hour and the Saturday mid -day peak hour, as presented in the following table: Weekday PM Peak Hour and Saturday Mid -day Peak Hour Trip Generation for Current Proposed Development Plan, as Compared to Previous Proposed Plan (1) DU = Dwelling Units; SF = Gross Square Footage (2) Exclusive of entry/building services and retail lobby With this reduction in trip generation, the traffic implications of the York Place Development will be less than presented in our report dated February 2007. As presented before, we are confident that the adjacent roadways will be able to effectively accommodate trips generated by the proposed development. I ILI Edina, Minnesota Tr?ffoc Stu April i 2008 , Proposed 106-0095.3 F7] DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. Weekday PM Saturday Mid - Peak Hour day Peak Hour Tri s Trips Land Use Size Unit") In Out In Out Residential Apts. Market 114 DU 51 25 32 27 z Z Qq Z General Retail (2) 18,000 SF 30 31 42 39 � J u a TOTALS FOR CURRENT PLAN 81 56 74 66 g Q. Residential Apts. - Senior 85 DU 6 4 14 11 General Retail (2) 39,000 SF 63 69 90 84 W TOTALS FOR PREVIOUS PLAN 69 73 104 95 NET DIFFERENCE +12 -17 -30 -29 (1) DU = Dwelling Units; SF = Gross Square Footage (2) Exclusive of entry/building services and retail lobby With this reduction in trip generation, the traffic implications of the York Place Development will be less than presented in our report dated February 2007. As presented before, we are confident that the adjacent roadways will be able to effectively accommodate trips generated by the proposed development. I ILI Edina, Minnesota Tr?ffoc Stu April i 2008 , Proposed 106-0095.3 F7] DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. "At A landscape, archrrecrure Y R O Larkin TE Miller Ho ATTORan Development, LLC April 28, 2008 av 'P2 C� Cj C� �; a � J - ly N m�a ssrt r ,¢r Grading, Utility and 106 - 0095.3 F-8] DJ R ARCHITECTURE INC. landscape architecture fir- _ i; � -jnronnc :y n r�IGt , V,V "� i�iHmlwn C&ronn' L76e hu S+iiwwi. Nn. ki �u Sri >un��em.� . CPLAN '- TING PLAN zo TI 3 PLAISTED CO. PREMIUM GARDEN SOIL MIX SPEC, Larkin TE Miller Ho ATTOR`an. Development, LLC u Edina, Minnesota April 106-0095.3 F-91 DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. TREES WITH BE REJECTED FOR THE NOTES: FOLLOWING REASONS: 1) CONTRACTOR SHALL LOCATE WITH PIN THE ROOT FLARE OF EACH TREE PRIOR TO DIGGING THE -POOR FORM PLANTING PIT. (THE FLARE IS THE POINT OF THE TRUNK AT THE TOP OF THE UPPERMOST - DAMAGED TRUNK - BURIED ROOT FLARES HORIZONTAL TRANSPORT ROOT.) - ENCIRCLING TRANSPORT ROOTS 2) REMOVE SOIL FROM TOP OF ROOTBALL TO EXPOSE TOP OF FLARE. TREES WITH MORE THAN 2" OF - UNCONSOLIDATED ROOTBALL SOIL EXCESS SOIL ABOVE THE FLARE WILL BE REJECTED. MEASURE DISTANCE BETWEEN FLARE AND (DUE TO EXCESSIVE HANDLING BOTTOM OF ROOTBALL. SUBTRACT 10% TO DETERMINE DEPTH OF PLANTING PIT. Natfy the landscape architect If any ...licts to 3) DIG PIT TO DEPTH DETERMINED ABOVE. PIT SHALL BE DISHED WITH SIDEWALLS AS SHOWN BELOW. f"illbot. 9111 relocation. Call Its, .hat be resplsible for the repair of any damage. to w SCARIFY WALLS AND BOTTOM OF PIT. 3. The Contractor shall be responsible for compM,g with al applicable codes, regulations and permit. 4.) SET TREE IN PIT 50 THAT FLARE IS ONE -TWO INCHES ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE. governing the work <, The Contractor shall be responsible tar all mulches 10 -10 -10 fertilizer per cubic yard Da square 11t thoroughly raised iota the by b al ed by rolptling. HEAVY CLAY OR POORLY DRAINED SOILS (MOTTLING), CONTACT LANDSCAPE 15. Watering: Mailman o .a(ering schedule sK,h NI 1 Re plan. Verily all qucnVtea sh-, on the plant E RELOCATED OR ROOTBALL FURTH ER ELEVATED. schedule. 5. The Contractor shall 111d re III the site at ead /turt hat. try seethe,, .ate, m e often as required by ind w icati— of heal stress ch as sifting 1-3. Check RODENT TRUNK PROTECTION: CORRUGATED POLYETHYENE moi,twe under mulch prior to .Itvi,g to delerr- riaroge of material, or supplies on -site will not be allowed. My plant stock not planted on day of delivery DRAINAGE PIPE SLIT VERTICALLY OR I /2" HARDWIRE -CLOTH MESH AFTER INSTALLATION, TRIM OUT &CITMAY CYLINDER, .DIMENSIONS: 4" DIAMETER (OR GREATER) X 3fi HGT. DEADWOOD AND /OR DEFORMED TWIGS. DO NOT CUT LEADER. 6. The contractor shall keep, pavements, plllers and buildings clean and unstained. Al .antes shall be SEE SPECIFICATION SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH - 4' DEPTH X 5 FT DIAMETER. prompt" removed Irom Ue site. My damage to esislmq fall for Winer protection during . only period. PULL AWAY FROM TRUNK OF TREE STAKES AND GUY WIRES - discrepancies eslst, The specilicati,os take precedence BACKFlLL WITH 1/2 NATIVE SOILS AND 1/2 PLANTING SOILSEE NOTES BELOW day of instatotl. Use 4' Ia Veer, ] for shrub MIX THOROUGHLY. SEE SPEC. FLARE, SET AT 1'-2' ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE, SEE NOTE ABOVE DISH PLANTING PIT. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF PIT AFTER SETTING ROOT BALL IN PIT. BACKFlLL TO WITHIN 12" OF TOP OF ROOTBALL AND SATURATE WITH WATER. -CUT AND REMOVE TO BACKFlLL UNE ALL TWINE, WIRE AND /OR BURLAP. - BACKFlLL UNTIL PIT IS FULL, WATER AGAIN, UNDISTURBED SOIL OR COMPACTED SUBGRADE STAKING: GUY ASSEMBLY: 16" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE (40 MIL) 1 -1/2" WIDE STRIP- (TYP.) DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA WIRE & 3 STEEL STAKES OR SIGN POSTS O 120 DEG, O.C. (SEE STAKING DIAGRAM). LFS CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TREE IN A PLUMB POSITION FOR THE DURATION OF THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. STAKING DIAGRAM COORDINATE STAKING TO INSURE UNIFORM ORIENTATION OF GUY LIMES AND STAKES, TREE PLANTING DETAIL N TS SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL 3 ENTS PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL b Nrs CH AWAY FROM ALL STEMS TO PREVENT ROTTING PRUNE TRIM BROKEN Be DEAD STEMS ONLY 3- SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH FINISH GRADE - PLACE PLANT TO BEAR IN PRIOR GROWING CONDITION AS PLANTING SOIL MIXTURE SEE SPEC. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING. COMPACTED SETTNG BED- USE PLANTING SOIL UNDISTURBED SOIL OR COMPACTED SUBGRADE Pftfl2M kOr11N:aFOU aLL srEUs ACE 1LW15 ACCONOING i0 ULCNSCHEDULE N EASEe OF OOUNT- PULL 'A' F.. wSH GRADE -PUCE PIA. i0 :W SAME Nf1A1MN5 P T t OuPNON ROWPiG om NIMPE E SPEC. L Larkin TE Miller IandscaPe i1o�� n a r c h l F e c F u r e e , T ATTORNEYf D e v e l o p m e n t , L L C ATTACH GUY WIRES 7/i OF THE WAY UP THE TREE TRUNK. ATTACH EACH WIRE TO THICK NYLON WEBBING. DO NOT LOOP WIRES DIRECTLY AROUND TRUNK. ALLOW SOME FREE PLAY IN EACH WEBBING. AFTER INSTALLATION, TRIM OUT DEADWOOD AND /OR DEFORMED TWIGS. DO NOT CUT LEADER, NOTE: LOCATE FLARE OF TRUNK PRIOR TO SETTING TREE IN PIT. REMOVE ROOTBALL SOIL TO EXPOSE TOP OF FLARE. SEE DECIDIOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL GUY ASSEMBLY: 16' POLYPROPYLENE OR 90" TREE SPADE POLYETHYLENE (40 MIL) 1 -1/2" WIDE STRIP (TYP.) DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE & DUCKBILL EARTH ANCHORS. NQLE: GUY ASSEMBLY OPTIONAL BUT CONTRACTOR ASSUMES FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTAINING TREE IN A PLUMB POSITION FOR THE DURATION OF THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING COORDINATE STAKING TO INSURE UNIFORM ORIENTATION OF GUY UNES OPTIONAL STAKING DIAGRAM UNDISTURBED SOIL OR / COMPACTED SUBGRADE 2 MACHINE MOVED TREE PLANTING DETAIL TUTS PLANTING NOTES I. NI quan'Jlies, shapes It beds and locations shat be 11 Planing ,ul la Vee, and shr�AS: Fertile Ideal. loam verified sad adjusted as required to conform to the c..ldidng a liber al amount al humus and I."N. of sect condllans 0 the st,, Revie. with landscape aLecl prior 1, digging. rcN sustaining rigorous plant 9—th. It shall comply .ith .,DDT Specipcoton 3877 Type B Select Topsail, 2. Locale all utilitea, including 'gapan I'Nes, ..R the mielure shall be free Irom hard pack subsoil, sWnes, Owner for proprietary uligties and Gopher State One Call It 612-A5A -0002 (twin Cities Metro Alec) or I -BOO- chemicals, nosh used., etc... Soil m,all,, shall have a ph, bel.ecn 6.l sand 7.5. Incorporate I paM1 peal moss 252 -1166 (greater M'TnesotC) AB hours belara digging. Ian three parts soil and 10 -10 -10 fer0mr at the rote Natfy the landscape architect If any ...licts to of three pounds per cubic yard. h IAInIe q bed. f"illbot. 9111 relocation. Call Its, .hat be resplsible for the repair of any damage. to w mcorpomle this mia(ure In, lout the entire bed by mtatlon, into he lop 12' of soil. 3. The Contractor shall be responsible for compM,g with al applicable codes, regulations and permit. 14, Plating soil for perennial bed./gmundl ,: 50% clay loam, 25% sand, 25% peat m eith 2 lba, governing the work <, The Contractor shall be responsible tar all mulches 10 -10 -10 fertilizer per cubic yard Da square 11t thoroughly raised iota the by b al ed by rolptling. and plant'ng wil gwnties to complete the .ark shown 15. Watering: Mailman o .a(ering schedule sK,h NI 1 Re plan. Verily all qucnVtea sh-, on the plant lh ... ghly .ale, It plant, arc .eek. In —rhely, schedule. 5. The Contractor shall 111d re III the site at ead /turt hat. try seethe,, .ate, m e often as required by ind w icati— of heal stress ch as sifting 1-3. Check .hich has been removed far ne. plant beds. Long -term moi,twe under mulch prior to .Itvi,g to delerr- riaroge of material, or supplies on -site will not be allowed. My plant stock not planted on day of delivery need. C.,Vactor shall make the neceswry armngemenl. for water. shall be heeled in and .at,,. until inetatapon. Plant, 16. Use ar1i-dessicanl (Wloruf or approved scull) ch not maintaieed lo ft. ma wtl be s.jected, deciduous plants moved tn leaf and for evergreen, 6. The contractor shall keep, pavements, plllers and buildings clean and unstained. Al .antes shall be moved 1y1'une App" as per manWacturem 'mstm,til All evergreen, shall be ,prayed in la le prompt" removed Irom Ue site. My damage to esislmq fall for Winer protection during . only period. facilities shall be repaired at the Contractor's ""Is' 7. The plan takes precedence aver the plant schedule II 17. Mulch: Shredded hard.aad mulch, clean and free of noxious seeds or other deleterious material, in all discrepancies eslst, The specilicati,os take precedence s, planting beds and for trees. Deliver mulch on e the planing notes add 9enerol notes, day of instatotl. Use 4' Ia Veer, ] for shrub B. Eusling trtea and shruba to rem ,in sh,l be beds, and 2' tar perenrdal /ground coves beds. unless Protected to the and Ira. Irom all —structon traffic, storage 0, _Wins etc., silh i ht. orange plastic oR..ise directed. IB. The landscape architect reserve, the right to r.j.d safely fencing adequate" supported by steel fence 9ast snot nq arty plant, which are deemed u .tisfactory. 19. Maintenance shot begin immediately site, each Na subalilutian,u 1 aleriah ,haN be accepted o D m portion of the work 1, in place Plant mdere, shall be ,Ness pp"ed in wltirg by the landscape architect. proleded and rhaintin,di Intl the weak. I of 10. M planting stock shall conform to the 7menaaI ploll" h complete, inspector has been made, and Standard for Nursery Stock; MISI -_u 60. lolert ed:lion, of the American Aswciolion of Nurserymen, Inc., planing 'e accepted escM,ne of the guarantee. Maintenance ,hat inchde .alering, cultvatirg, 11. At pplants .hall be ranleed Ipr one ywr ljjulhe mulching, removal of dead material, resetting plants Theeas olhetees In3P. shell full cost of to proper grade and keeping plants in a plumb post,.. After acceptance, the Owner shall assume T- temace replacement g lobar and plants. responsibilities. Hover, the Gontr.d,r shall 12. !=m /Rme of Plonl'ng: Decidu.o patted plants: Aprill -Junel Aug. 21 -Nov. I continue to be responsible for keeping UK trees pkunb I21D o,hout the guarantee period. Denduoua b &b Apnll- Junet; Aug.21 -NOV.I 2p. Contacts andl request N writ.g a final Evergreen Dotted plants: April 1 -Nay 15; Aug. 21 -Oct 1 Cvergreen D,Lb'. April I -May 15; Pug. 21 -Sept. IS acceptance inspection. Ikle: The —tractor Toy elect to plant in off - sedans entirely at his /her risk. CDPLANTING NOTES ors EARTH ANCHOR, 24' DEPTH. Edina, Minnesota April 106-0095.3 11-01 DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. MOM "MIT.-MOW. �r v in r. landscape i ( h i r e, i u _ , -. —, -,.,,.,... Larkin TE Miller HO wrroRNivf D e v e l o p m e n t , L L C York Avenue Streetscape Edina, Minnesota April 11: Renderang DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. f a n d s c a p e Larkin TE Miller Ho AtTORan Development, LLC View from Xerxes Avenue and West 69th Street 12 DJ R ARCHITECTURE INC. k [I 10 tom` k7i R� • 41 West 69th Street Retail Parking Entry 1 Retail Parking Entry N > 4 Q 1 ` Larkin TE Miller landscape Ho�fm ,i rc hr/et iu,e �..w...n .p •� Al10RNEVi as V a I pme"I, L L C "410 4 Story Residential Building f llJtll lr,#.711IrIG.,.7lvl y VUIIUII Irb ate° -,+sue N s- _ PL Edina, Minnesota April i i Enlarged • ' 106-0095.3 DJR L 4 6 Nt, % y � a Ptov PAW 3 •` Cr `��t;m. f / ti•• 1 \' � �, ���• , � i•1�'S �l. P • PI♦ ry•�► ii , •• do 4% mill •• r' sii• 1 1 r I r I • M i �rw - _ • -� `� t • 1 ♦ . t � 1 •lflf • I / M� � 1 I j! ,. _ • .•' • �•7 1 I r - li; 1 1 1 �� 1 r.�..y *�.`./}���� . 1• y ..',!_.f� 1 T 1 j r fill • 1 � � f �.� � � � rr n � -1 � , R' �• I•� •• 1 is� � �� Pt•• ^t It n 1 /fr r • • v• J � • •�.• •• •. �.�- • «.. .. ..... � � fl r •.• .r. f 7r •n •'••• w "r f 1 ..,,,• •,• �t • � • • _- � � / r 1••'•i M� Y• r • ► ♦ rw •..• Yarllr i`�• . ws.rrf l p •/ C 1 �r t�► t' .. . ,p• r 1 t. ... w ♦ . t w ti ` tt ■r t - _ • r ` �• 1 mow• NOW M ♦ � �• �y • son Ok. At • " Y • l +�1—r - • ' t 1 • a+wl�� • to nwe • r • r.w . jo Or IF r Larkn TE Miller landscape arc Ho r�an h 1 KNES 0 e v e I a p m e n t, L L C PL Mmmmiffirfi i a, Minnesota April i i 1 106-0095.3 [14] DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. Cadillac Dealership 69th Street York Place West Retail Building A Walgreens 70th Street Edina Library Xerxes York Place East York Place West Avenue 4 Story Residential Retail Building B Building L'k'n TE Miller landscape Ho an arroRwevs D e v e l o p m e n t , L L C York Place West York Avenue Retail Building A Westin Galleria Galleria Edina, Minnesota April 28,2008 4impipp i 106-0095.3 Fi-5] DJ R ARCHITECTURE INC. �I 0 0 a _ - -- 18'-4" BRICK VENEER 4 MMEM w I ALUMINUM STOREFRONT GLAZING 4 STORY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING METAL PARAPET CORRUGATED METAL SIDING METAL CLAD BALCONIES BRICK VENEER ROCK FACE CMU METAL PARAPET CLERESTORY GLAZING 24._8.. 18'-4' RETAIL BUILDING B South Elevation PARKING RETAIL BUILDING B ENTRY 69th Street Elevation Larkin TE Miller 7 ands c a p e arc h i! c' r! u! e .a..«,R,.+.w.•• Ho nan i�oKr+evt Be V e I O p me n i, L L C v BRICK VENEER ALUMINUM STOREFRONT GLAZING ROOF DECK 4 STORY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING RETAIL BUILDING A METAL PARAPET CLERESTORY GLAZING 24' 18'-4" YORK PLACE 77 Edina, Minnesota April 28, 2008 o1 106-0095.3 DJR ALUMINUM STOREFRONT GLAZING 8" METAL CLAD COLUMN 4- BRICK VENEER Retail Building B - East Elevation Retail Building B - West Elevation Z'�- L TE Miller landscape .i r c h r r e c r u r e �..,..,,.�..,,.,... Ho Ai TOR` D o v e l o p m e n t , L L C ALUMINUM STOREFRONT GLAZING — METAL CLAD COLUMN — BRICK VENEER — SITE LIGHTING ROOF TOP UNIT SCREENING CLERESTORY GLAZING METAL PARAPET Retail Building A - East Elevation ROOF TOP UNIT SCREENING CLERESTORY GLAZING METAL PARAPET - - -- -- Retail Building A - West Elevation 24'-8" 4" Edina, Minnesota April 28, 2008 El vat 4 ons 106 - 0095.3 F,17 DJ R ARCHITECTURE INC. WOOD TRELLIS BRICK - METAL SIDING �� STUCCO Courtyard Elevation 7 71 ROOF DECK ROOF DECK u Xerxes Avenue Elevation L TE Miller landscape (��'� i r c h r r e r r u _ Ho arroe` Nfvf D a v e l o p m e n t , L L C CAST STONE CAPS & HEADERS ROCK FACE CMU /- WOOD TRELLIS Y U W � LL W O v O V � a Edina, Minnesota April 28, 2008 �eyatmons 106-0095.3 11-81 DJR ARCHITECTURE INC. CvYrtA ve-Y 1 GYP^ = Cff. I I I 1.)eRl 1 sew a a .0-1 . w S. .ai d r 0a S. r,a Q. ��y• °i '� . au, In 1. t ? e/a �' k•, ,_Jr- /, / ^Tr -LJf -n / nA /n ^f,L /'rr-v A/l1 /„/�� I 1 r.lI. VIM -db.p°t In wr[sorowd P. L./1 /vV ..:VII vL_ / /v l/. ./�... I a I \ M. A-I I E-- . 0001.67 1,•l ` Y _•� I 1 °�' L" �.: -OIL p.ralw w., a• sera w Ca, a Em,a e.rr•nrnv. ayQ. &erg I 1 °. °. ( . °4 �T- -- Y �" -- �F• - -� —T- Y - - -� ,� 0.r,\\ A•w �'\ ._ _ _ sr a�_ _ _ _ _ _ _' \ _ _ _\_.>•. _ _ _ _a, _ _r• _ •�• jh. R Q IIa Pest a w rlene 300 rel CO r,•.1 W. REGISTERED tro Slatwr •n [ a». Sorrel• c•,nl} sans �, °' ... ^ � J °• , M11 ,�, \` \ _ �,. ne d ry Y•y •r Mr,rl t a r l r 1r nC• 11 tr ,su . 7 a I ew t rsln it....... wl w+ a w 710 11 fM ua a ewt Inw•a rysq MI w w Res ar a w Erl 1►w1C.rv6as� I wewlrtal•.u.w ir•yinl --T - -- -- -- -�= -ar �' '�`- '-�-��m :a• wEBTODTH R __�.. .... / .� Qom• ` Q•, 7• / / '°' ., ....... s,.rr �„ Ital ee,l d rrl r. RtGSr[R[o t,rp LPw. r10 ala. 11..• -.• Cew,1a ...1 v.wrs / _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 1ar,e•ate tyrq woes a w saris 1tb r.a w 1,ny E"1 a u• roes vo w i • °•� - , ) \ _ eerrrrl �nrareor __ _ _ _ _ - er. _ _ I ��_ `•• yr• e.. __ ___ y r . �` t 11 !• v1 /0 —` .. , ,Srb , N,,,l w 1re , a aaYr•r v rtelr w M j lrt d .sow rr r• �... r �� -stir / JP. re., w a..s or. re •61.11 R• --r SIR' ° 1 w tilar.s• a Ins twllrc•t• wester 1nE.m1 jam. r _ — • -_.. M — — — a), -- °. ai�a1�'T 92 i JOAN dV/ .�. w_ o d:. i n.• ti °• s. �Q' r>, w`. .a w %i. °. ' a w / <> NMZSL °' R" is �6 _ �,� r '� °• ! 6 6 Q.. •..;. - orrr�lR.cr� L`. roes a ) 1 �� '.1 .r11s.r w --A it ­0 Vea,• ra ra., noes, w. maa.w,a• °11 ^l l ♦ /- �` rib /y �•J M['ti _ yn— ro - .. aaw wA .•, •d, ens w• we.n er+ea ara iecm:w• d ..a. r ^1 ., .IL l / rs+� 6- ../ 1 L% ' '� «� 9 (W�r L \/ ; ♦. °. .. `r•e. .'I'w,s rwutewer• are 6.•+er•a>;r, a .�•a t .u.) , " ." tiv e - .° -. w.I ° a.. �wf. e.nes,w rcww�.a• •m�a.a 1• a. C... .tae [ �r4..1 we 4P• e+. .. ••-r • q, \ rt. .+r y.v.. w • a al.ew• a0i1II,d ow 606701] ue:t.e a•eweI. aI 1w _ y .._ ..... "" _ -..e- �• a.r" M., am revs a aaa vaara •. r rneel• mlo., a• � =( I ! � ...- Yi..... .. - A) •Y - - d ' `.a"' C, ..•w. r161r e,eR. b yeti ae•I,e ens cesr.n<el'o• Ia• der w , t , , ` .. . '. !` s I yyyyyy��' c a•awvwna mW4e a .nw - aI ,.,a n.r rm. w,v, s (, I `6' '' °. . : ��'''���'''������p�sL'''ttt�66 •_. � � ` rtWb aMka Io earurctr, d a•W'.� am1 l 11• w v zl It«gl, ooaru "r.n ac ew. .1 as1_s.- eaa to mr •.ewaua. r....1 1.u. e.. `' I L F ° .6tI ;" • °• I -. 2Sim t Ol a ruem � _ `Ri 1 { 13 ' I 7) c'weew.m'i '� ♦ I r la) ■ NQ RO Rw ®S ° (^ ♦ V I a °�d' 1 • `w,- r I , " ; - / ti start eRla lotto C I w.d.s >er e w ew Ps ., w 1 6.45 w I6e r tm e sP[I a eim s sweesa.- , 1�e'rr pan ,ae•a 1 d e Mvas. tvr.wlur,t allane�. t6r r.+m t.nv ,tr m ( • - ' ' ! _ N. V n - 1 -,� •.)Tr• r)•a oil see• low lw L rte e•t•mrea le b l .« .,,e1 ware. Wft, n i a s R.a. l e,w•. S) I �• � i• 1, w,. .motor . � Ito __ *"' - [R[........ l • FT' • (- e,pem�11m0 ever. Rat, see re. tA1X616Q. dMSU.• 1. P 1 Seeten,6w i 1661 ¶W i,lenr,Man M dt1e.W rdn tM [[Y. ra •t•. °• .•... I p TA ` : — . ! 7� , re . 161.1.1 is rt w ]A ear a f S 6 ° a. ; •�•• °' \ t .1 rw C � RR.9 ass P. R" •rJ � � •Q I •Q� r:.. �• Rr •an,rrmrn °,' _ d:. �.. 2 9 S: rn• weial resat) r P, I PC D-3 (luar,.a ta.riam owvil -ll <> •� ° ". sWCIr ] . 1 lYr Yes >A1eIr T' .1.01'. F• f • \ \ \ 14 - Y °�.Tr'iP'O (' TM .lanasa rt6e�• Ia .a,• I'm -7 v. Mr.I� �• II i ` �1 • w.d °Nr. :'WC -. _, •n.. .' N r n•. -a •r J `_ �� i I �,' / I s ° � � �•Q R' . av{ �; r. q�R.L _ �': .. �\ . k -•C C �ia 0 !; =R ' � Y'•3�' �.,` � rSaw/sr 711.11 aM » 1••t •pr�•,�• �^ 1/.. &•• ...� `• Y"' '_, ' � wu M cA� 1 1 ' \ ,. J CN) Cor d lM 'IG r a. Ea•n / p p •Le}•1 1• a Sw 11, $rf._ eso 1q JI 136 .� L \ • ' % •. r....•„_ •v r. _ °' at re \ ` \ au ° ! 1 '• L) L,al eianoa eelAw rwn1P•, Cans) C_d . •,•trn. ,"' I 1R' /;� �,a•� -.:.^ �.. -' �. 7=.11 �. w.E I ? <> ,t owls eI oawllwr r I ' •R• �a, ^ � I: t ` w �r u aae r� • a.s too ED D­ :tar CO. 0w . "`O o, b, min oat o.,•t" .w°r,,,ratr, `l. J C aun -. -.� \ \ \... •+• -.._ P I is <_ CO ord•a COL O� IIA `1 'r l : _ �j��', 1 \-• ° \ 1'+� \ .I '1 • , a: �iaa," Ell I E � �� mod. sum W= a" I¢. r �1PF- -. - - _ =° - _arm �a' ` 0.- v °`rim a y zt fJtO. Dr,st" Pa's 6P,1 (.) I [� I� ..... y arlYSi o s� l �: sE I �� 01 o'_,a . °i,s ata ,ar,a IK Si srgn na( ,rc 6a,•1....n....,<mra. n.•s •a. r•i orate aeel,Ia 1ra1a new !c C'� C) - Iw I I �, T• x'ie ni n �n I P I «rDR a:nattlw,e ew I - wean .al.rlw• .tt.t :) 106 .I ow11" 101 IW.e w" fO. I I/r Kle�sio ro I EIr woos ly,l aW Ir I re owty l�'tel dire ."i •rwla .ores 17. lt� rNAL Owt" � ,awq r f' . / AV/ /l h 7 l../ I I '' asc to o l6 0 3 l � D__ r�rbe•a�eww11• PIP. W.1 tar s l< sIL wean wr oases .rotor I I F sits Drat•• •••,•I,tat• aN tm r 145 -, rr1l, uw lu• Y • 1„w aw eearl sw Den11" sls,• •e• tm ,aprv,letbn a a vr1 a w •snow+. d 11,• rte me.e a0a•.e ws a w oatlw a iC o.r11s tm a e..e r1 e" e'"L R we Ian w - rU le•q I I I 1ERD. o.ra" van •wIa ee. ICS Owl" ---or dt" u,'• Star er 11 WMP,. 1666 TL dean vo16c t V4 e IRw4 drrel" re.W. Va,eM,w,r is L .A10 S.Vwl•1C. LLG I to aware• wmrP•1•r. •••rawl11lwr .,r UN 0­ 1101 Oars" rewPawq lwglal• W l v mrarar RI•CII Imo' \ w err n dawn r.elr 6r w fer L bar► P.l.s ewes lle 1- 16.76 \ YQ Or,am a1,Mea aal ales wsrr Dwl" w w rowed. 6 W O. PI- sir E n•s Dwa•• .see - tm °r WEST 70TH STREET ans 0— OtP`MI%eir ® y Duvet" C•ew r LQGILLiY 7G/'10GRAH .ro Dwa" L:aw I , and ///L/7)'8T/ilEl'!pi G' I11P1m 00rewl.°a1ap1. rro• Ir 7EA�L9IQEVSQ�BVl• LLC Ste 0- SPEC SPCC Owl" Cerem sat.• Vr )eDtin ryr ua e.h as f•ar>1m.w.e m o sz� SUS vely HEG /STEFIED LAND SURVEY NO. w (-V Ln G,d j i.) / I R. ;;5;DR£� n � S 8 9' H 5- R££ ORAatAGE k UTILITY FASDOENT.- uH N PER DOC. 00. M327 � m (54Q88 IP£dSTERED LAIMD $t/7YFY AfR 619) w ' -NORTH UK / N89 5415 f 54Q55 A/£ASMW TRACT Y is /�I R .tsf.os � F'-�_ _ 1e131 — � --.- I 20 1 _ _DRAINAGE a UTRIrt EA3EYEMT -� 120 R.H OOC NO. 260827 N 60 O 60 120 SCALE IN FEET I ►� ----- 3-- - - -- - -- 310------------- - - - - -- — ' N -) © I E) ci - -BEST UE OF ' N L.J l., 1C - TT ; c LJ ci � TRACCT T Y 1 OF I I A A f n r -WITH LAW OF M i , THE NWTH zoo rf owl a TRACT Y I, OF TRACT M 2F IMj uESr /Si66 5415'W /94.8/ LJ I rL 4 c) I I 120 J A N 60 O 60 120 SCALE IN FEET i1 L , \) f — i L_ , % L L/ o� O---- ----- 3-- - - -- - -- 310------------- - - - - -- — ' N TRA C T A - -BEST UE OF ' N , THE FAST 347M R - TT ; or TRACT Y E] � TRACCT T Y 1 OF I I A A f n r -WITH LAW OF M i , THE NWTH zoo rf owl a TRACT Y I, OF TRACT M 2F uESr /Si66 5415'W /94.8/ b A E P 3 1qp� G' NV I o R N 60 O 60 120 SCALE IN FEET ? TRA C T B EAST tAE an THE REST 310.00 Ff or TRACT V 7 r .... V 11 v� i_ r �l 589 -V JO'W J47.00 ; -HORTN UK OF LIE T R 1 OF F TRACT M , N N I s I i /V L.I. v 1 -SOUTH LWE pp 4y h j L�l l.; I �i 40 30 L•y �� I r t'J l0 I;z LJ 4J OF TRACT Y \ The basis of bearings is assumed O Denotes 1/2 inch by 14 inch ivan monument set and marked by R.L.S. No. 16456. O Denotes 1/2 inch iron monument found 14--r- t ,)✓1 le S I hereby certify that in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 506. Minnesota Statues of 1949. as amended. 1 have surveyed the following described property in the County of Hennepin. Stale of Mnnesoto, to wit: That part of the North 200 feet of Tract M. REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 629. Hennepin County. Minnesota lying West of the East 347 feet thereof. and that port of the West 310 feet of said Tract M lying North of the South 196 feet thereof except that part thereof lying Was of the West line of the East 347 feat of sold Tract M. And That pal of Tract M. REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 629, Hennepin County. Minnesota lying North of the South 196 feet and lying East of the West 310 feet thereof. I hereby certify that this Registered Land Survey is a toner! delineation of said survey. that this Registered Land Survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the Stale of Minnesota. Dated this _ -- day of ----- - - - - -- 200 -- - Mork S. Hanson. Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 15460 Doom, YIWESDTA This Registered Land Survey was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Edna. Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this __ —_ day of —____� 200—. CITY COUNCIL OF THE Iry OF EDNA. YNKWTA BY' - -- City mo ner BY: TAXPAYER SERVICES DEPARTMENT. Hennepin County. Minnesota I hereby certify that taxes payable in 200— and prior years have been paid fa land described an this Registered Land Survey. Dated this day of 200__ . Jill L. Alversan, Hennepin County Audits By --- __— _- - -_ —__ Deputy SURVEY DIVISION. Hennepin County. Minnesota Pursuant to MINN. STAT. See. 3636.565 (1969) this Registered Land Survey has been approved this day of 200__ William P. Brown. Hennepin County Surveyor By: REGISTRAR OF TITLES, Hennepin County. Minnesota I hereby certify that the within Registered Land Survey No. ______ was tiled in this office this ------ day of __o'clock Michael H. CunniH. Registrar of Titles By Deputy Sande Land 200—. of l "w 40 30 I E] EAST LpIE--_- .0 a TRACT Y F r� ? TRA C T B EAST tAE an THE REST 310.00 Ff or TRACT V 7 r .... V 11 v� i_ r �l 589 -V JO'W J47.00 ; -HORTN UK OF LIE T R 1 OF F TRACT M , N N I s I i /V L.I. v 1 -SOUTH LWE pp 4y h j L�l l.; I �i 40 30 L•y �� I r t'J l0 I;z LJ 4J OF TRACT Y \ The basis of bearings is assumed O Denotes 1/2 inch by 14 inch ivan monument set and marked by R.L.S. No. 16456. O Denotes 1/2 inch iron monument found 14--r- t ,)✓1 le S I hereby certify that in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 506. Minnesota Statues of 1949. as amended. 1 have surveyed the following described property in the County of Hennepin. Stale of Mnnesoto, to wit: That part of the North 200 feet of Tract M. REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 629. Hennepin County. Minnesota lying West of the East 347 feet thereof. and that port of the West 310 feet of said Tract M lying North of the South 196 feet thereof except that part thereof lying Was of the West line of the East 347 feat of sold Tract M. And That pal of Tract M. REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 629, Hennepin County. Minnesota lying North of the South 196 feet and lying East of the West 310 feet thereof. I hereby certify that this Registered Land Survey is a toner! delineation of said survey. that this Registered Land Survey was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the Stale of Minnesota. Dated this _ -- day of ----- - - - - -- 200 -- - Mork S. Hanson. Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 15460 Doom, YIWESDTA This Registered Land Survey was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of Edna. Minnesota at a regular meeting thereof held this __ —_ day of —____� 200—. CITY COUNCIL OF THE Iry OF EDNA. YNKWTA BY' - -- City mo ner BY: TAXPAYER SERVICES DEPARTMENT. Hennepin County. Minnesota I hereby certify that taxes payable in 200— and prior years have been paid fa land described an this Registered Land Survey. Dated this day of 200__ . Jill L. Alversan, Hennepin County Audits By --- __— _- - -_ —__ Deputy SURVEY DIVISION. Hennepin County. Minnesota Pursuant to MINN. STAT. See. 3636.565 (1969) this Registered Land Survey has been approved this day of 200__ William P. Brown. Hennepin County Surveyor By: REGISTRAR OF TITLES, Hennepin County. Minnesota I hereby certify that the within Registered Land Survey No. ______ was tiled in this office this ------ day of __o'clock Michael H. CunniH. Registrar of Titles By Deputy Sande Land 200—. of l "w i� $-�� ��� o f �� awl d S (c, V'\' E D C WEST 69TH STREET SN 2TM9 Lorr .. W uonimr• ., _ .. j 19 s. •.naeP ! 9 0 - 1 w.a v. 1 I Sign i . I w _ RET710•BULONO -'r: e Y - I �... Z W i ® 22 i W - Z) ... RETI0.BUL009G .. ® ® 1 ! sw ! / � - I W 12.7604 1 I ® my Q W cc 22 .+ 1 .�.- .1•.1.1 .1/02 _ �j Sn 9aEen ® .. Ca,arlr P.r160 + O cv1r 6004 _ y 1E-2 950 sm Caawrlr R�Ilar,t•Sb• BebrDa•1•aHi•- f ,'\ ,�� Dpi 1 - IOR 7500 11•Dd •.% 1 /__H] 4�zzYYeNJ ,wr o+.i osv w ,�•, lye .� -� I l \ j a alwr r t OR Now 1 � neoa \ 1 ,r nmm mm .. eunm 1 BR ,. OR 1 eR 28R Pa1•i•5 7 .•. • 20R - csmr�a• Reeb•rr Teal •7od 7900 „bpd s 5500 . . 1 7 a lap 20R I 1 B11 1 9A 1 BA 1 BR 1 M 1 OR 090 d 790 d 790 r 79019 790.1 79019 1 OR S 7900 &W d 1 Ili 0."pww* •1 - -'\ M 1, ' 1 F4 .r 1 .1r ai0•Plla,.fe0or .' ,`yf`�. .�: -. _. . ' S Fes♦ �-\ - _. \.. •.. 7''.. ; . � \� ! -` I '•�. 0 20 40 80 e.ede..•,... a. ea N G1 FIRST FLOOR -- „r CUR ewrsr.wao, M E,HNiAD er n2iALM ¢W¢ W� rc aII$ Y u oil A011 REPORT, To: Mayor & City Council From: Cary Teague City Planner Date: June 3, 2008 Subject: Set Hearing Date for Cross - Town Medical LLC - 4010 W 65th Street, Edina, MN Recommendation: COMMENDATION Agenda Item: V. D. 2. Consent Information Only❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action: ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Set Hearing Date for the June 17, 2008, City Council Meeting for Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning Approval for 4010 West 651h Street, Edina, MN. Crosstown Medical LLC. Information/Background: See attached Plans. 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Tel 952.426.7400 Mohagen Suite 200 Fax 952.426.7440 Hansen Wayzata MN 55391 www.mohagenhansen.com Architectural Group Crosstown Medical Office Building April 28, 2008 Design Narrative Preliminary Development Application Introduction: On behalf of Hegenes Management, Inc., Twin Cities Orthopedics, P.A., and Edina Crosstown Medical, LLC, we, are pleased to submit this Preliminary Development Application to the City of Edina, Planning Department for consideration. Over the past few months, the Mohagen/Hansen Architectural Group Design Team and the Crosstown Leadership Team of the Medical, LLC, have worked diligently to develop a solid concept for the proposed medical office building that not only meets the expansion needs of Twin Cities Orthopedics, P.A., but also provides a quality development which enhances the existing neighborhood. Interaction between the Crosstown Design Team and the City staff has been crucial and helpful as we have been evaluating and analyzing the complex issues associated with the proposed site. The following information provides a summary of the project components and some critical background information that has shaped this submittal. Existing Site: The site located at 4010 West 651h Street is currently occupied by a two -story, 26,000 GSF, office building that includes a number of medical, dental, and general office tenants. The existing building has occupied the site for 40 plus years and is ready for redevelopment. The existing low- profile building fronts Highway 62 and is depressed into the site with "access from the flanking parking lots at the second floor level. The parking areas are accessed separately from West 65th Street via curb cuts at the east and west ends of the site. A cell phone.tower and the associated support buildings are located on the northwest corner of the site adjacent to the building. Adjacent parcels include a bank building to the west, the Fairview Hospital parking ramp to the east, the Cornelia Place Apartments to the south; and two smaller commercial sites located to the southeast of the site. This project will also require permits from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District and Mn/DOT. Applications have been submitted to each agency concurrent with this application. Initial feedback from the watershed district and Mn/DOT has been considered in the preparation of this submittal. Proposed Site: The proposed project is slated to include a 4 -story, approximately 76,000 GSF, medical office building. The medical building will be the new home of the Twin Cities Orthopedics Specialty Center, which will incorporate the consolidation of several facilities, including an Orthopedic Clinic, MRI Suite, Ambulatory Surgery Center, as well as General Office space for Twin Cities Orthopedics. Parking for the facility will be provided in an attached above - grade parking structure that will be integrated into the site and building with complementary building elements. Site access points will be in similar locations to the existing curb cuts, but the eastern access point will function as a service entry only, while the western entry will access the parking structure and provide the main patient drop -off area for the building entry. Two major objectives associated with the site of the redevelopment included burying the existing overhead power lines on the north .portion of the site, as well as removal of the existing cell tower and reintegrating the cell tower components'into the proposed building architecture. ❑ Mohagen /Hansen Architectural Group ❑ Design Narrative Preliminary Development Application April 28, 2008 Page 2 of 4 Zoning Classification: The zoning classification for the existing site is POD 71 (Planned Office Development) and under this application, the Owner is requesting:that the site be rezoned to, RMD (Regional. Medical District). The POD classification, limits the total building area to .5'FAR'"or (.5,x the site area of 88,000SF). That ordinance limitation results in an allowance of only 44,000 GSF of building area for the site, which is not only too'small of a'building for Twin Cities Orthopedics, but is also underutilizing the.site relative to its proximity to the existing Regional Medical District and Fairview Hospital to the east. Upon,evaluating the City's ,Comprehensive Plan, developing a medical office building of this type and size on this site appears to be an appropriate use relative. to the adjacent properties, proposed density limitations, and traffic considerations for the greater Edina Central Business District (CBD). The extension of the Regional Medical District from the -east side of France Avenue to the west has essentially already been completed via the construction of the Fairview ramp.- That ramp.was a required facility in order for the hospital to function and meet its own expansion needs for staff and, patient parking relative to the expansion of the Outpatient Services associated with the new Heart Center. Along with the skyway connection, the ramp itself is perceived to be an extension of the Hospital Campus. Therefore, extending the RMD classification'to the ramp parcel, as well as to the adjacent 4010 site is a logical progression and alleviates the concerns over limited building size. Under the proposed RMD classification, the proposed site could be developed as an 88,000 GSF building based on an allowable FAR of 1.0. Again, this project is proposing a total building area of approximately 76,000 GSF, well under the allowable FAR. The Design Team is aware of the public's concern over increased density within Edina's Central Business District. . However, upon reviewing the Comprehensive Plan and the existing context, we believe that the increased density on this site, due to its unique size and location is an appropriate solution and is consistent with Edina's Comp Plan which allows for a density development with an FAR ratio between .5 —1.0. We believe the proposed project addresses Edina's density issue in a responsible, manner compared to developing higher density sites elsewhere within Edina's CBD where traffic and congestion problems are most prominent. Allowing higher density developments similar to this project near sites that are already zoned as high density, such as the Hospital Campus, as well as being located adjacent to major highways serving these areas, makes the perceived and real impact much less due to the minor impact to the surrounding area. Traffic congestion and the perceived impact of a site development such as this was a huge concern. Therefore, the Ownership Team engaged ,a traffic engineer to analyze the traffic patterns within the area and model the impact of the proposed development. The formal report, submitted to the City, indicates that development of this site, as well as the adjacent bank site to an FAR of 1.0 would not have a negative effect on the service levels of the existing intersections surveyed around the site. However, the report does recommend adding a left turn lane and signal for the eastbound and westbound lanes of West 651h Street approaching France Avenue to alleviate the potential traffic congestion. © Mohagen/Hansen Architectural Group ❑ Design Narrative Preliminary Development Application April 28, 2008 Page 3 of 4' Site Configuration: . In evaluating the development of the site and the program needs of Twin.Cities,Orthopedics, P.A., the Design Team developed numerous options that ranged1rom 44,000 GSF•toB0 000 GSF andeven a 90,000 GSF for a multi -site project including the adjacent bank site.. However, incorporating the bank site into the project was not viable, due to the Owner's inability to gain control of the site. The initial design options.for accommodating parking for each of these concepts included both one and two levels of below -grade parking, on7grade parking and structured parking above- grade, as well as endless combinations thereof. Unfortunately, the presence of a high water table on the site made doing even a single,level of below -grade parking cost prohibitive, due to the significant structural costs related to the design of the sublevel parking floor. The curreritsite configuration represents a,21,000 GSF building footprint, for a total building area of 76,000 GSF, with an above -grade parking ramp to the west. Each level of the parking ramp is sloped to allow the major landings in the ramp to align with the building floor elevations. The parking structure is scaled similarly to the building fagade so that the two structures read as one uniform building mass with similar and complementary materials. The parking structure and the building also combine to create, in effect, a sound barrier between Highway 62 and. the residential development to the south. In the Regional Medical District, there is not a height limit, rather, the building setbacks are tied to the height, requiring the building to be set back from the property line a distance no less than the height of the proposed building. On this particular site where the proportions of the site are not ideal, they become extremely restrictive and ultimately create a hardship, and in order for the.building to be located in its optimum position, the development will require setback variances. Site Features: In developing the civil engineering and landscape aspects of the project, the Design Team has been challenged to balance the need for storm water management and green space against the needfor proper site circulation, building access and building massing. The narrowing of the western portion of the site makes it extremely difficult to provide parking and building structural bay sizes and overall dimensions to work in an ideal fashion. Therefore, we have placed the building and the ramp farther north toward Highway 62 to maximize the green space on the south side of the'building along 65", Street. The public street frontage road along 65th Street has become the focal element for the landscape site concept where the Design Team has incorporated structured rain gardens, 'planters, stone retaining walls, steps, and canopy elements as a'method of reducing the scale of the building which addresses the pedestrian scale, enhances the streetscape as viewed from the sidewalk and street, as well as from the adjacent residential buildings at Cornelia Place and Point of France. Included in the storm water management system, we are proposing the use of concealed rain water storage tanks from which water can be drawn for irrigating the plant beds and lawn. This sustainable approach to storm water management and irrigation design works toward satisfying the LEED related goals for the project as well as eliminating the need for additional ponding to satisfy the runoff from the parking structure. ❑ Mohagen/Hansen Architectural Group ❑ Design Narrative Preliminary Development Application April 28, 2008 Page 4 of 4 Site Features(continued): In addition to the grade level site'development, the Design Team intends to incorporate a green roof system as a way of dealing with rain runoff from the building: In essence, the landscape development for the project,;will be carried UP' onto the roof and will offer an interesting and attractive view for Cornelia Place and,Poini of France residents and adjacent Fairview - Hospital. Other mechanical'roof systems will be located in an enclosed rooftop penthouse or behind architectural screening. Service elements.for the building, such as the emergency generator, transformer, and service entry components will be located on the northeast corner of the building in an attempt to screen the areas from the adjacent residences. Currently, the service access is located on the east portion of the site within the property boundaries, however, the Design Team is continuing to develop concepts for a iruck turnaround area that would overlap into the open yard between the proposed building and the adjacent Fairview parking ramp and provide an integrated solution. Discussions with Fairview continue and a revised plan showing that service access condition will be submitted for review, if the layout is approved:and agreed upon by both parties. Building Material Description: Twin Cities Orthopedics, P.A. and Edina Crosstown Medical, LLC Leadership Team desire to develop and create a building that portrays a sense of quality and pride within the community while providing a facility that can serve the long -term needs of their patients for many years to come. To that end, the Mohagen/Hansen Design Team has worked to evolve a design solution that creatively uses materials, color, massing, and planning principles to successfully weave together the building, the parking structure, and the landscape in a manner that is complementary to the neighborhood in both appearance and scale as well as compatible with the existing neighborhood context. Building materials will include multiple colors of brick, stone or architectural cast stone accent bands,' architectural metal, and glass and aluminum curtain wall systems. The parking ramp will use complementary precast concrete components with openings and details that relate to and complement the adjacent building. As directed by the Ownership Team, it is the intention of the Design, Team to design a timeless structure based-on implementing the conceptual principles developed by the USGBC LEED standards for sustainable or "green" design in order to provide Twin Cities Orthopedics with a quality solution which strives to promote solid planning principles while promoting a strong stewardship for preserving our environment. k: \ jobs \ crosstown—medical \ crosstown—medical—shell-07430\ 001_admin \ code \ 07430_ memo _rezoning_narrative.docx2.docx ❑ Mohagen/Hansen Architectural Group 3 - CROSSTOWN MEDICAL PROJECTrINFOit J JON ' , � I s Sr i Crosstown Memcal Bsuildin-- 'M j Project Information ? . � t Xr I C� � yyF b 1 t j � d ;TWIN CITIES ORTHOPEDICS. Mohagen Hansen acniracrwai April 28, 2008 AL: ..c; '. .- ., ti. :� , ..� i ,eta .. ,. A.� •..•. 77 _ t m 4T x. -N r *Alt �T- Site and Surrounding Context (Looking South) April 28, 2008 LRUSSTUWN mL:UILAL PROJECT INFORMATION TWIN CITIES ORTHOPEDICS Men Hansen ku.wf- c-P T TWIN CITIES ORTHOPEDICS Mohagen Hansen Site and Surrounding Context (Looking North) "" " •�•i• Go„ April 28, 2008 CROSSTOWN MEDICAL PROJECT INFORMATION Z TWIN CITIES ORTHOPEDICS Mohayen F '0 Hansen V . Site Photos - Fairview Ramp and Site, from Highway 62 .Y.L' April 28, 2008 CROSSTOWN MEDICAL PROJECT INFORMATION TWIN CITIES ORTHOPEDICS Mohagen Hansen Site • • • Site Photos - Existing Building April 28, 2008 CROSSTOWN MEDICAL PROJECT INFORMATION TWIN CITIES ORTHOPEDICS Men Hansen A,•crurocr— y c+a.c i�r j mom AO kt-.Q- W . Tww Site Photos - Bank April 28, 2008 CROSSTOWN MEDICAL PROJECT INFORMATION Z TWIN CITIES ORTHOPEDICS Men Hansen Mob,—) Site Photos Cornelia Apartments April 11: CROSSTOWN MEDICAL PROJECT INFORMATION ,M Mfg AK { �. F j w TWIN CITIES ORTHOPEDICS Mohagen wT' Hansen Site Photos - France and 65th, looking west at Fairview Ramp A10- April 28, 2008 Zoning i POD-1 *iii ►���� � ►��:�: 1 i���� ���� ►i�� +i /i X, PROJECT SITE 4010 651h STREET WEST Zoning Background HIGHWAY 82 . APO (Automobile Parking District) HIGHWAY 62 MDD-4 (Mixed Development District -4) Click here to MDD-5 (Mixed Development District -5) ® view Park the Cily Code PCD -1 (Planned Commercial District-1) ® pertaining to the ® PCD -3 (Planned Commercial District-]) ® PCD -4 (Planned Commercial Distrlct-4) 85TH 5T W POD-1 c POD -1 (Planned Office District-1) Classification S IpT PRD -1 (Planned Resident District -1) PRD -2 (Planned Resident District -2) ® PRD 3 (Planned Resident D154ricl -3) ® PRD-4 (Planned Resident District -4) ® rn m ■ PSR 4 (Planned Senior Residence -4) N I New Search PROJECT SITE 4010 651h STREET WEST Zoning Background _ -I R -1 (Single Dwelling Unit District) EM R -2 (Double Dwelling Unit District) 0 RMD (Regional Medical District) FAIRVIEW WEST RAMP PARCEL 6400 FRANCE AVENUE April 28, 2008 CROSSTOWN MEDICAL PROJECT INFORMATION T TWIN CITIES ORTHOPEDICS Men Hansen illll� Zoning . APO (Automobile Parking District) F-1 MDD-4 (Mixed Development District -4) ■ MDD-5 (Mixed Development District -5) ® MDD -6 (Mixed Development District -6) Park ■ PCD -1 (Planned Commercial District-1) ® PCD -2 (Planned Commercial District-2) ® PCD -3 (Planned Commercial District-]) ® PCD -4 (Planned Commercial Distrlct-4) PID (Planned Industrial District) POD -1 (Planned Office District-1) POD-2 (Planned Office District -2) ■ PRD -1 (Planned Resident District -1) PRD -2 (Planned Resident District -2) ® PRD 3 (Planned Resident D154ricl -3) ® PRD-4 (Planned Resident District -4) ® PRD-5 (Planned Resident Dlstrict-5) ■ PSR 4 (Planned Senior Residence -4) _ -I R -1 (Single Dwelling Unit District) EM R -2 (Double Dwelling Unit District) 0 RMD (Regional Medical District) FAIRVIEW WEST RAMP PARCEL 6400 FRANCE AVENUE April 28, 2008 CROSSTOWN MEDICAL PROJECT INFORMATION T TWIN CITIES ORTHOPEDICS Men Hansen illll� r CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC PROJECT INFORMATION The site looted at 4010 West 65th Street is currently occupied by a twostory, 26,000 CSF, office building that includes a number of medical, dental. and general office renams The existing building has occupied to sire for W plus years and is ready for redevdopmmt The erdsti g low-profile building fronts Highway 62 and is depressed into the site with aoress from the Banking parking lots at the second floor level. The parking areas are accessed separately him West 65th Street via curb cuts at the east and west ends of the site. A cell phone tower ad the associated support buildings are located w Oe northwest corner of the site adjacent to the balding. Adjacerd parcels include a bank building to the west the Fairview Hospital parking ramp to the east. the Cornelia Place Apartments to the south and two mulls cimmmerdal sites lasted to the soudwast of the site. Thu project wig at%require permits from the None N4ileCreek Watershed District and WV= Applications have been submitted to each agency concurrent with this application. Initial feudbar} (huh to watershed district and h1nWT has been considered in the prepaation of this submittal. Proposed Sitr. The proposed project is slated to mdude a 4-story, app — mutely 76,000 (SF, medical office building. The medical building will be the new home of the Twin Cities Orthopedics Specialty Curter, which will bmrpocate the cmesohidadan of several faelites, including an Orthopedic CI= MID Suite, Ambulatory Surgery Cents, as well as General Office space for Twb Cities Orthopedic Packing for dwfacility will be provided in an attached above -grade parking shuchue that will be integrated into the site and building with complementary budding elmuscs Site accoss pomb will be in similar locations to the eastug curb cuts, but the eastem acres pond will fmution a a service entry only, whole the western entry will amer5 the parking structure and provide the main patre d dropoff area for the building troy. Two major o*cb- associated with the site of the redevelopment included burying the existing overhead power lines on the north portion of the site, as well a removal of the existing all tower and reintgating the red mwer components into the proposed building anddtecture. Site Configuration, The current site configuration represents a 21,000 GSF building footprint, for a total building area of 76,WOGSF, with an abovegrade parking ramp to the west Each level of to parking ramp is sloped to allow the mapr landings in the amp to align with the building floor elevations. The parking structure is scaled similarly to the building facade so that to two structures read a one uniform building muss with similar and cimplemmrary materials. The parking structure and the building also combue to crate, in effect a sound ham" between Highway 62 and the residential development to the south Site Featmas In developing the civil engineering and landscape aspects of the project, to Design Team has been challenged to balance the nerd fm storm water management and green space against the need fur proper site circulation building access and building massing The narrowing of the western portion of the site makes it extremely difficult to provide parking and building EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING I 4010 65th STREET WEST EDINA, MINNESOTA PROJECT INFORMATION (CONTINUED) 1 placed the building and the camp farther north toward Highway 62 to maconize, to green space on to south side of the building along 66th Streek The public street frontage road along 65th Street has become to fool element for the landscape site concept where to Design Team has incorporated strut uw.d cain gardens, plarneca„ stare retaining walls, steps, and aropyelmnmts as a method of reducing the sale of the building which addresses the pedestrian sale enhances to stmx6ap , as viewed from the sidewalk and street as well as from the adjacent residential buildings at Comelia Plxeand Point of Fans. Included in the stonn water management system, we are proposing the use of cam Baled rain water storage tanks fmm which wateran be dawn for trrigatng to plant beds and lawn Thu sustainable approach W sloth water management and irrigation des p works toward satisfying the LEER related goals for the project as well a eliminating the need for additional pomdug to satisfy the nmmff from to parking structure. In additon to the grade level site development the Design Team memds to bmtpoate a green roof system a a way of dealing with hash moil from the budding. In essence, the landscape development for the paged will be carried up onto the roof and will offer an interesting and attractive view for Correlia Place and Point of Frmue residents and adjacent Fairview Hospital. Other mechanical roof systems will be located in an enclosed rooftop pendh or behind ardhi ectual screening. Service elements for the building, sndn as the emergency generator, transformer, and service entry cimponemb will be located oh the northeast curer of the building in an attempt to steam the area from the adjacent residences Currently, to service access is located on to east portion of the site within the property bondarim, however, the Design Team is continuing to develop concepts fm a truck turramoud area thud would overlap into ft open yard between the proposed bmldmg and the.*— Faimew parki g amp and provide an integrated solution. 0'vr Siam with Fairview continue and a revised plan showing that service access condition will be submitted for review, if the layout is approved and agreed upon by both parties Building Material Descriptions Twuu Cities Orthopedic, PA and Edina Crosstown Medial, TLC leadership Team desire to develop and create a budding that portrays a serge of quality and pride within the community while pmwdmg a facility that ran serve the long -term reeds of their patients fm merry years to come. To tat end, to MofugaVEIrmsen Design Team has worked to evolve a design solut x, did creatively uss materials, colm, massing, and planning principles to successfully weave together to building the parking structure, and the landscape in a manner thal u complementary to the neighborhood in both appearmha and sale as well as compatible with the exsting neighborhead coderet Buddug materials wit mdude multiple eDImof beck, stone or architectural cast stone assert bands, mdutedur al metal, and glass and aluminum curtain wall systems. The parking ramp will case complie ..tary precast c mmge components with openings and details that relate to and complm e m the adjacent bufldmg. As directed by the Ownership Team, it is the intmtion of the Design Team m daigrh a timeless structure based u implementing the oahceptual principles developed byte T7SM LEED standards for sustainable, m'grom design moiler to provide Twin QmOrthopedics with a quality solution which strives to promote solid planning prmdpla while promoting a strong stewardship for preserving orrenvuoranent AREA MAP 07430.00ML APRIL 28, 2008 CERTIFICATION I FETTER! CUM 7W0 TIC RAtt SWIOOION W WORT US PR PAIEB or ME OR UrODt W DIM S MIS OIL, Arc TINT I AM A My UODG D ABOETECr GOER TIE IMS OF RIE STATE OF M7 YAI6r L IIMffiI, AN IEIS11010 tglt199E 205D6 CITY SUBMITTAL CLIENT APPROVAL a A ana:samE a: h noun wo wsms nu wraawmh h®rmm ere; mart sine . �n „caw w ax conch won. sown ohrn .emm ouv� caw m®u x mama wo2a sour naa aaonomh revoc soma ma nc a cuAran 71AL CODE REVIEW APPLICABLE CODES ODBONTIONAL am= WOE (SC) 21106 CHAPTER 11 AWDOMM IN AIM 2007 CtW. 1341 CWPIER 30 AMMOITS IN UM 21107 CHAP. 1302 6OBtNTDNAL IN CODE (6C) 20W D awio11AL I OWWAL WOE (01C) MW 101 SWE 11111M CODE (I®C) 2W2 YN PLUIM CODE 2OW rx DOW COX 2W2 MTIOM ELECTRICAL CODE 2W5 MN IN COOD MR OCCUPANCY REQUIREMENTS IN SPRY00FR PROTECDW: MIT SPRINKLED TYPE OF WNSIRUCfIQt a BUIIDOIG OCCUPANCY: 8 – MEDICAL OFFICE S-2 – PARKING GARAGE AREA SUMMARY PARKING LEVEL AREA (GSF) BUILDING LEVEL AREA (GSF) LEVEL Pl 19,829 FIST FLOOR 20,072 LEVEL P2 27,716 SECOND FLOOR 20,847 LEVEL P3 27,716 THIRD FLOOR 20,847 LEVEL P4 27,716 FOURTH FLOOR (1I11URE) 11,620 LEVEL P5 27,716 FIFTH FLOOR (CORE) 1,805 LEVEL P6 29,724 SIXTH FLOOR (CORE) 1,305 TOTAL 160,417 TOTAL 76,996 Mohagen Hansen Architectural Group Drive e 200 55391 1,7400 17440 vwlr.LHLoragewensmCOM -I p e� �s 0 ti rA Planning .1 v S w° 4a 0 w m n " o w 0 R - - - - -- B•- BEPfOYS dREf- - - _ - - - - -- �• '. I -1NV- 861.66 Call OO 48 Hrs before di991n3 - - - - - - t�2 -.'._ —r - -,- -- - - _... - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - —r - - - - GOPHER STATE ONE CALL - -- 1 , � R -87SJJ r m+ dz sit NoRm LW£ or mw svi? Or - -- J Trin qty Arco 651- 454 -0002 J ..� °._ I+WSE) -8=676 wKSYl =86768 _. 60•SS�1 yz m+ ms Luz °1S _ - THE NEI 14 7 SEC .rrl r. 7B. a 11 Mn. Toll Free 1- 800 -252 -1168 - ,. __ •"' . 880" i 6- s ms --DB"E ••. _ _ __- -.__ �y'L'r0. OECA7UOU5 IRE£ q _ ._ .97 fi CWmER0aI5 rRd - _ s' 60• SRWY m5 -_. �, �A•• A� g7s i 6- TREE � \ � - � �62TACffS-- •SBA. - - - - -- -- s 1 , 72 -- - 10" OECRl0005 IRf£ ,y, W IO. OEQ/S IREr -- -- - 7941 SoOARE` .� FEE -_r ' =' Ac 6' DfOOUpUS REE �_fOraD'IRON PIPE rDER LJ i # 6• CCNIEROUS TREE -' -. / .. ,.. ..•• '• - - NB91051WT 1• IEClD0005 B7P-.. _ •- DEa000U5 6' DECIDUOUS ``44a:44 -� - ' B+GOVBERa/S TRLE -+! • SB -r - _ .� . NLRMERL r LAVE OF SOU7RUTALE 9'TCE PARK AND A.L.T -A UEI WR _ - , -, -. -� Mal + - - - - -- B•- BEPfOYS dREf- - - _ - - - - -- ___ ? � , __ - - _ _ -- --- - -- ` EnN�y ,. _6-C -0RAAA0.R ri z gTaaw` eaTaRuL7s EXISTING LIT N --- - - - - -- - O , ----- - - - - -TTY - - -- 6•COWREROUS ASE I - - - - --' pA � �62TACffS-- •SBA. - - - - -- -- s 1 , �1f�I 1 S � U -- -- - 7941 SoOARE` .� FEE -_r ' "---EXISTING Unum EASEMENT =' - ff - = -- -------- - - - - -, —® 'o--- - - - - -- ;�- -: , "Su-8 • SB -r - 6. I - -- - - -87 • ®870•._ •„ • • - 0 • • • • • O • O O • C I "� 11 � _ • i I .- Otiml7� - C" FFIT'fS j 0 FFI �QFRUEV-9MJ � i I I 1010 CEIPPMATIOI I 1010 65IN STREET MSr Ci FTE ENRANCE QEV =876 �-• ff ' W � rp aV. I OFFICE BUILDING P AR � TE BOOFow o".. -808 zLWO: PLANNED O'Tl USTRCT - r • i ` -B OEOO 0 s - - O C c� I BU/LOMO w r f1El! -B9l9 I arawous Mal 1- WS -- y `� • • LOT 2 2 g i • ®i ' 058_, = a i• (, I �L • • • • .- • • • • _ ® • • i -• • • o • • o of ` -� - - - - -- -ems- - ^ti 40 58 -2 = ± - _ �� ^ 1 -BLOCK K i - C 0 N p C M S V, W. Q S N W -C /ALL 10 _ OEODUOs 0 74 I • DECID"S 0 zwT- &•9 F A p p � J0 , J` (` ' S� TREE RY 869 w zrq RW -89 - 8905 � l W B7o -. s 8 � a - 1020•DEaDVOUS REE %uDV 6- nr r___EXIS71NG WALKWAY -Sr - - /•. - EASEMENT - " -. - 6• DEDDIVUS RIM- B]I180 A1£ - __ - -_ -•70' TREE WV- 859.66 `sm /BaO- +• o+<"' -yy, "L'rP s8wo 0�� f _-48 r b 8'7�2 US Ol 9 - nay b r- b00 0U5 /• S ,S YaV UYENT - -_ •sB `NONI/IET]YRS - i - ' - Io ♦' REE WEST e - m= •, sw• _48- DEdDI/a/s t` TREE �� __ 9• � `moo- 4 w WV -86117 +a1 O V \ \+w wV =B1a19 � LEGEND -- 21-LEpOV01U IRU O BIU9V/DaLB ® STOW YANMOrL y� T< s1REET LNiIT -rm- GS LIE \ I \ 07AV?ais TEL£ © HILAIOE BOX .. CLOY NZE -rVY- POWR OVE10" \ 9•VCP sui R/Y -87576 -C �t OEOEIVO/S TREE Q TEl(AIME YAIVIIQE AY PoILER POE PoYrER IwLERdPO/ND Or \SNr wV -86509 OEMND ® TRAFUC CLWDIa. BOX © fucim BOX SANITARY g•ER \ , • Smm/AVOO POST B HAIR NOTE fEi ELECTRC LE1LR -srrr- STLYW SeMER -r SIGN- IRAFFW1VPkR # OAFTIC IIOHT A ELECTRIC YANNOLE - - TELEPHONE OWRHEAO BENOIYARX: !OP NUT HYDRANT -r-� SXIF MAFFTC/DTNER Da GAZE VALW ® arcmw MIER -nAl- TELEFWONE UACOMROLWD ® MAIL BOX O HYDRANT © SANTARY MANNQ'E -•Y- WATERYAw \ y v \ HANWCAPPED SIAA INSTEP YCTER ® SEMEN LLEANO/T -I- FENCE WE 0 FERC TEST O CLmg SRi BOX ® SEEMW CArw BASH y4.r.r DECMUCE/5 TREE LIVE 0' 20' 40' 80' © LraWraeac CLOT ® -M? YA.VLE ® CA RN BASH tA1MA1p CbVNfROUS TREE LME YJ Yy YV YY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 5 CABLE TV BOX p mu a FLARED EM SEenaw aNTB . GUrrM Q GAS YETV? -tn- CABLE IV = COVOWW SURFACE BIIUYwOUS SURFACE EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th STREET WEST EDINA, MN "• wv r.n..L.Arm ec Msen Hanson ArohIfBGIUIBI droop I® rr. Luz CA •. W 25 A 4M sm m rF. mm/Y6 .EMI Pm.. I REBBDr CER77Pr TRAY THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY MR OR UNDER MY DLUCY SUPERVISION. AND THAT / AB A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER rms ors OP THE STATE OF YINNBsork MARE SMD RECBT U77DR NUMBER: 43933 W6srWooD SHALL 86 DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OP THEIR RESPEL7IVR INSTRUMENTS LIP SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COARMO.V L1I. srAmmRr AND OTHER RESERVED RICHrS. INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF rHr ArrACHBD DOCUMENTS. N0. DESCRRPTLON DATE PROLER NUMBER 20071205.00 DRIWN BY CAECirD Br.. C. CARDA DATE: 4.28.08 COMPur6R OBAmRr: EXISTING CONDITIONS CITY SUBMITTAL N C1 ya° C h O N bn 0 O N ro _ N N n 0 4 �1 _ 1 I 1 1 1 I I '1 ,1 Cdl 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651- 454 -0002 EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT _ Mn. Toil Free 1- 800 -252 -1166 TO BE VACATED 1 LEE RELOCATION OF VD TELEPHONE AND OPTIC WITN_UTILITY PROVIDER .. AMK x _ I lEMOVE EMSTINO tETXNING WALL. lYP) A pX COORDINATE RELOCATION OF J EXISTING CELL TOWER UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE AND COMPONENTS TO -BE RELOCATED - -.. EASEMENT WITH THE UTILITY ON PROPOSED` BUILDING ROOFTOP - - -ER -- Removal Notes 1. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND U71UTIES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION /CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND. 2 CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE LIMITS OF REMOVALS WITH PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND FIELD VERIFY CONDITION OF DOSTING APPURTENANCES TO REMAIN. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING OR REPLACING MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (SUCH AS FENCES. SIGNS, IRRIGATION HEADS, ETC.) THAT MAY BE DAMAGED BY CONSTRUCTION. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE ALL NECESSARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN SITE STABILITY PRIOR TO EXECUTING ANY SITE REMOVALS. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION WITH UTILITY PROVIDERS FOR REMOVAL AND /OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AFFECTED BY SITE DEVELOPMENT. ALL PERMITS, APPLICATIONS AND FEES ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. S NO WORK ALLOWED IN MNOOT RIGHT OF WAY PRIOR TO ACQUISITION OF MNOOT PERMIT. 6. NO WORK ALLOWED ON FAIRVIEW PROPERTY PRIOR TO OBTAINING PERMISSION FROM FAIRVIEW OWNERSHIP. 7. ALL REMOVAL OF UTILITIES WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH CITY OF EDINA ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (952.927.8861). & CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY WITH CITY OF EDINA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. 9. TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE SHALL BE PLACED ON CITY STREETS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MNMUTCD, MAY 2005. X 0' 20' 40' 60' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th STREET WEST EDINA, MN ". Wq�rmw ns Aoam oo® mUr 4A�mna taEWEI>.leod a.w.� Mn RTC Hanson Mch(ta fo-u p H3roup 0 I ®r.r. Oft m& TA M. 40 tr so rw 294017uo I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT rRIS PLAN GS PR8PA"D BY A OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION. AND TRAT r AY A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER 771E LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA CBRLMPHER J. C1RLLL PE RrelmnaN NUERP& 43360 WESTWOaD SNAIL BE DEEMED rK8 AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF rREIR RESFECTNE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHAM RETAIN ALL CaHMoN LAW. STATUrORr AND OTHER RESERTSD RICR7S INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACKED DOCUMENTS. NO DESCRIPTION DA7E PROJECT MUMBr& 20071205.00 DRAWN Dr CHECEED BY.. C. CARDA DATE: 41I108 COMPUTER DIREMAr. REMOVALS PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL N y C2 N N 0 0 w ' 3 ro _ h N N a Site Develovment S SITE ADDRESS: 4010 65TH STREET WEST SITE AREA 87.794 SF (2.02 ACRES) E]OS71NG GREENSPACE: 40.150 SF (45.7%) PROPOSED GREENSPACE: 39.990 SF (45.6 EXISTING ZONING: PLANNED OFFICE DISTRICT (POD -1) PROPOSED ZONING: REGIONAL MEDICAL DISTRICT (RMD) SETBACK REOUIREMENTS BUILDING PARKING FRONT 35' OR BLDG. HT. 20' REAR 20' 10' SIDE 20' OR BLDG. HT. 10' PROPOSED USE MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING SIZE: 63.000 07 I 24.1' ( 10.4' ' Y 30.0' Y a Z Q' m SIDEWALK AT FIRST JOINT BEYOND PROPERTY LINE AND TAPER PROPOSED SIDEWALK TO MATCH Parking Summary PROPOSED PARKING: 310 STALLS/ REQUIRED PARKING: 302 STALLS- INCLUDES. 26 SURFACE PARKING STALLS 310 TOTAL STALLS ° REQUIREMENT: 63.675 X .00025 - 15.9 15.9 +195.0 -211 SF /STALL 83.675 / 675 - 302 STALLS REQUIRED 20.0' BUILDING SETBACK General Site Notes = = 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION FOR THIS PROJECT PROVIDED BY WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES - -- 2. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE CONTRACTOR 94ALL FIELD VERIFY SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION /CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND. THE ENGINEER SHOULD BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY. 3. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB OR EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF EXITS. RAMPS. AND TRUCK DOCKS. 5. ALL CURB RADII ARE SHALL BE 5.0 FEET (TO FACE OF CURB) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. ALL CURB AND GUTTER ON PRIVATE PROPERTY SHALL BE 8612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL CURB AND GUTTER ON PUBLIC PROPERTY SHALL BE 8618 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES. WARNING SIGNS. DIRECTIONAL SIGNS. FLAGGERS AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY AND ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS 8. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE SECTIONS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE CEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN FULL ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES 10. NO WORK ALLOWED IN MnDOT RIGHT OF WAY PRIOR TO ACQUISITION OF MnDOT PERMIT. Coll 48 Hours before d199tirF GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Ar 651- 454 -0002 Mn. Toll Free 1- 800 -252 -1166 ..i- - .. - - - - ,D Sign Legend REEERENCr WL MnDOT DESIGNATION - - -- -- -- - -- _ Sl STOP SIGN 30" X 30' RI -1 S2 HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE 12' X 18" R7 -81M S.3 NO PARKING 12' X 12' RO-38 PROPOSED FENCE/ SCREEN WALL Site Legend — — — — — PROPERTY LINE LOT LINE — - — SETBACK LINE -- - - - - -- EASEMENT LINE CURB AND GUTTER - - - -- - POND NORMAL WATER LEVEL RETAINING WALL — FENCE CONCRETE PAVEMENT O CONCRETE SIDEWALK BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT O NUMBER OF PARKING STALLS Q TRANSFORMER RAE SITE LIGHTING - - -. T TRAFFIC SIGN wr POWER POLE ° BOLLARD / POST SAW CUT EXISTING' SIDEWALK AT FIRST JOINT-.. BEYOND PROPERTY LINE AND TAPER PROPOSED SIDEWALK TO MATCH X 0' 20' 40' 60' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th STREET WEST EDINA, MN w warerrremrc °irm'"Pwrmw wer rAw4r mo® w� s�mns 1AkGMOOd arse_ Mn Hanson Archifectund ... Qltwp -® T_ TW C b a, T/ 44NV1m 96 TAA F. =. ?W ." w", 1-dpi I HEREBY CERTIFY TRAT TNIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY NB OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION, AND TRAP I AM A DULY LICENSED PROPESSl0NAL ENGINEER UNDER TIIE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. CLUlI 9PHER A. NROA PE RECISIRATlaN NUMBER 43360 WESTWOOD SHALL BE DERYED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS aF THEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETALY ALL COMMON LAW. STATUTORY AND 0 RESERVED RICHTS. INCLUDING COPYRICHIS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS. Na DESCRIPTION DATE PROJECT NUMBER 20071205.00 DRAWN BY CBECATDT BY.. C. CARDA DATE: 4.28.08 COMPUTER DIRECIVRY: PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL N C3 T tl 0 0 0 a 3 n _ N N • N Q. Erosion Control Notes 1. SLY FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AROUND SITE IN ALL FILL AREAS AND LOCATIONS WHERE STORM WATER RUNOFF MAY LEAVE THE SITE, PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION /CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 2. ROC( CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE WALL BE INSTALLED AT ALL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES 3. SILTATION AND EROSION CONTROL: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONTROLLING ALL SILTATION AND EROSION 876 OF THE PROJECT AREA THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE WHATEVER MEANS NECESSARY TO CONTROL THE EROSION AND SILTATION INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED CATCH BASIN INSERTS, ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, AND SILT FENCE CONTROL SHALL COMMENCE -- -- WITH GRADING AND CONTINUE THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT UNTIL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK BY THE OWNER THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY INCLUDES ALL IMPLEMENTATION AS REQUIRED TO PREVENT EROSION AND THE DEPOSITING OF SILT. THE OWNER MAY DIRECT THE CONTRACTOR'S METHODS AS DEEMED FIT TO PROTECT PROPERTY AND IMPROVEMENTS. ANY DEPOSITION OF SILT OR MUD ON NEW OR EXISTING PAVEMENT OR IN EXISTING STORM SEWERS OR SWALES SHALL BE REMOVED AFTER EACH RAIN AFFECTED AREAS SHALL BE CLEANED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE OWNER, ALL AT THE EXPENSE OF THE CONTRACTOR. ALL TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SHALL BE REMOVED BY THE CONTRACTOR AFTER THE TURF IS ESTABLISHED. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL TEMPORARY INLET PROTECTION (WIMCO OR EQUIVALENT) AROUND ALL CATCH BASIN GRATE INLETS, AFFECTED BY THIS SILT FENCE CONSTRUCTION. (TYP) S ALL UNPAVED AREAS ALTERED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES MUST BE RESTORED WITH SEED AND MULCH, SOD, WOOD FIBER BLANKET OR BE - HARD SURFACE WITHIN 2 WEEKS OF COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION. - & FOR AREAS WITH SLOPE OF 3:1 OR GREATER. RESTORATION WITH SOX) OR WOOD FIBER BLANKET IS REQUIRED. 7. PUBLIC STREETS USED FOR HAUUNG SHALL BE KEPT FREE OF SOIL AND DEBRIS STREET SWEEPING SHALL BE COMPLETED DAILY. & SWPPP SHALL BE COMPLETED AND NPOES PERMIT SHALL BE ACQUIRED PRIOR TO ANY GRADING ON STE. DITOH CHECK _ EMSiNCSSWAIE - - -?o- I5,M1 I W I 9 275X - - 871.20 57'.6 en.99 74TA S -STORY a 871.99 Mp ARKING RAMP efi 875 1 875.20 871.63 BT. .41 a7188 X 871.20 fSr. 811.63 87261 - 875. ha',5 200X • 671.71 2`o0z .87261 OW_2 ems.BT.49 BT.20 811.-/1 87127 , _ . _ _ _ . _ _ . 874,05 674.36 875. \ - 874.7° 874.0° - _ 74.68 cl 671.89 87261 . g1 111 - 875.p2 NOTE MATCH NOTE MATCH 5iA2e -: EXISTING GRADES - - - - ._ALONG 65TH STREET _ WEST_ - Grading Legend Grading Notes EXSTINGi ffi - - PROPERTY LINE --980-- INDEX CONTOUR - �' - ­-982- INTERVAL CONTOUR - -°-- -- .-. CURB AND GUTTER B7i00 e POND NORMAL WATER LEVEL wwrw9 AfIWMAlW:;s Wr=Anee SILT FENCE M STORM SEWER -- ® FLARED END SECTION (WITH RIPRAP) 1 WATER MAIN -- --- '•- -_ -.__ . SANITARY SEWER RETAINING WALL - - RIDGE LINE ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET -. =91.00 SPOT ELEVATION 1' FLOW DIRECTION TOP AND BOTTOM OF RETAINING WALL R E.O.F. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW 0 RESTORATION' AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF 0 •.. 0 se-19 SOIL BORING LOCATION OINLET PROTECTION -AC,4 B 60 674.15ai 871.60 7 }Y'e,H.s�.g75.4t 4.70 ' --a712 N pt mt. y J 87121•i _ 410 �•r a.I ------ ____?NSTALL INLET PR07MMQN -CONCURRENTLY WITH - -I INSTALLATION OP PROPOSED Fl - STORM SEWER (TYP) aft o. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AS NECESSARY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF GRADING OPERATIONS (TYP) INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON -3: -1 -.SLOPE AREAS (TYP) CONFIRM PERMIT FROM MNDOT PRIOR TO ANY WORK IN 9]1' MNDOT -RIGHT OF WRY SF QsF� irii /. r/r ._.87a- ..... ..... /ii ���r� /// % b MEDICAL OFFICE '63,000 `S.F. FFE= 876.00 ,Oo e9 2.00% 1.r1O v CURB aeo' _ gga O N e Call 48 Hours before dI99inS GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TWIn City Area 651- 454 -0002 Mn. Tall Free 1 -80G -252 -1166 I NOTE MATCH 5iA2e -: -. ..,/ EXISTING GRADES Grading Notes -ALONG 65TH STREET - . B7i00 e ' J% 1. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY Y SITE CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION /CONSTRUCTION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND. e Sam - / � 2. CONTRACTORS SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULE. SLOPED PAVEMENT. EXIT PORCHES, RAMPS TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS, EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS, AND EXACT LOCATIONS AND NUMBER OF DOWNSPOUTS 3. ALL EXCAVATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF 'STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFILL/SURFACE RESTORATION' AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA. an.8 4. ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE FOUR INCHES OF TOPSOIL AND SOD OR SEED. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR PLANTING AND TURF b, ESTABUSHMENT. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES. WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL FLAGMEN AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE o,1y 874 0 / SIGNS, NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OF THESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE /- ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT_ TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALL CONFORM ` $74,13 j TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS. E / VuT 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING AND PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITH UNIFORM SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE BROWN OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES I .. ( 7. SPOT ELEVATIONS SHOWN INDICATE FINISHED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS & GUTTER - FLOW LINE UNLESS 07HERVASE NOTED. PROPOSED CONTOURS ARE TO FINISHED J* O SURFACE GRADE S. SEE SOILS REPORT FOR PAVEMENT THICKNESSES AND HOLD DOWNS 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDED A STRUCTURAL RETAINING WALL DESIGN `- 9 - _ CERTIFIED BY A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER. °72.39 •. 10. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL RULES / INCLUDING THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM ( NPOES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. n 11. ALL SOILS AND MATERIALS TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY AN INDEPENDENT - GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. EXCAVATION FOR THE PURPOSE KE REMOVING _ ( UNSTABLE OR UNSUITABLE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED AS REWIRED BY THE ri GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOILS TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE H74.80 l GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. I NOTE MATCH 5iA2e -: -. ..,/ EXISTING GRADES -ALONG 65TH STREET - . NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th STREET WEST EDINA, MN ". rr..le.orrr,sr r�.rW�rrm1A r� mrrr r4Wm4r 1EIWMtrood ��s Mn Hanson A/ChiIBCLMRTII ca7GMA 1® T.. Oft o.r Ir. rd ASt w ar ED ra oa2Atuu9 ke w 3�1 1 NEARBY CERfllI THAT TIDS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY HR OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION. AND rRAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROPBSSIONAL ENWNTRA UNDER TRT LA FS or rHR STATE OF NINNESOrA CHROMPHER J. r.Rn. PR RMS7RATIDN NUMMA, 43360 IESTIOOD SHALL B8 DEBMSD THE AM HORS AND OWNERS OF YHEIR AASPRCTIVE INSTRUMENTS OP SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAI, STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS NCLUOINC COPYRIGHTS OF TNT ArrACHRD DOCUMANYS. NO. DESCRIPTION DATE PR OHCY NUL®EA 20071205.00 DRAIN BY: CHECKED BY., C. CARDA AAM 4.28.08 COMPUTER DIRBCIORr: PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL CSI SWn 27,000 GALLON CISTERN LOCATED BENEA PARKING RAMP TO STORE 1' OF STORMWATER RUNOFF OVER PARKING RAMP SURFACE Y ZI_ Q - m I I I f 1 I sw- =w n 4 1. a 0 0 0 N ro N 0 a ___w 5 —STORY RRMR9— R7M'F—_! [tBU' LDjNGS O ME PLISTN ERFLOW I Ml PROPOSED ALIGNMENT FOR UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC AND PHONE TO BE LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY LINE CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH UTILITY PROVIDERS SERVICE LOCATIO TELEPHONE SERVICE — -.. m CONNECTI E I CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH UTILITY PROVIDER 1 I 9AEr0, 6 ~12 —. STMH 3 °f RE- 892.70 IEm868.53 STMH 2 I _rr PROPOSED GAS SERVCE LOCATION MEDICAL OFFICE '63,000 -S.F. CON IR LOCATION AND FFE= 876.00 ELEVA N PRIOR TO 26' -12' PVC STORM CON UCTION. M� SEWER.! 2.Oi I 73' -6' PVC SANITARY IE =870.76 HYDRANT SEWER O 5.0% / -- wa IE- 864.65 12' OUTLET OVERHEAD ELECTRIC 148' -8' DIP STRUCTED WITHIN I PROPOSED G COMBINED FIRE A_ 1 WALL IE- 870.50 DOMESTIC SERVICE � O O�M \ CONNECIf TO EXISTING SAN IT SEWER STUB. 1 CON IR LOCATION AND _ ELEVA N PRIOR TO -- - - - -- - FM CON UCTION. M� IE -86 t I WATER MAW - _.____ __. __ ►--rF HYDRANT sar / -- wa CORE DRILL NEW +R� CONNECTION 1 DOS STORM SEWER MANHOLE +sp, IE =868.00 - I 1 Call 48 Hours before digging GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651- 454 -0002 Mr. Toll Free 1 -600 -252 -1166 General Utility Notes 1. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND /OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES AND LIMITED MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION SHALL NOT BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR To CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OR ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES_ 2. ALL SANITARY SEWER. STORM SEWER AND WATER MAIN INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE PER MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE AND IN ACCORDANCE MATH THE CURRENT EDITION OF 'STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SLIVER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION' AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA. 3. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN THE NECESSARY FEDERAL. STATE AND LOCAL PERMITS FOR THE PROPOSED WORK OR VERIFY WITH THE OWNER OR ENGINEER THAT PERMITS HAVE BEEN OBTAINED. PERMIT FEES SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBIUTY OF THE CONTRACTOR UNLESS OTHERWISE ARRANGED WITH THE OWNER. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF DOORWAYS. RAMPS. TRUCK DOCKS. PRECISE BUILDING �— DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY CONNECTION LOCATIONS 5. ALL PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE SERVICE LINE CONSTRUCTION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY CITY PERMITS FOR UTILITY CONNECTIONS SHALL AND UTILITIES ALL BE INSPECTED AND APPROVED BY THE 1 CITY. THE CITY SHALL BE NOTIFIED 48 —HOURS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH I THE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION OR ANY REQUIRED TESTING CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT OPERATE, INTERFERE WITH. CONNECT ANY PIPE OR HOSE TO. OR TAP ANY WATER MAIN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO DO SO BY THE CITY. ANY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES O SCHEDULED OR UNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ARE TO BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR 7. WATER MAIN LENGTHS AS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE HORIZONTAL LENGTHS ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL PIPE WHEN INSTALLING ON SLOPES OR WHEN DEFLECTIONS ARE REQUIRED. THE JONT DEFLECTIONS SHALL NOT EXCEED THE y MAXIMUM RECOMMENDED BY THE PIPE MANUFACTURER OR BY LOCAL GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS FITTINGS REWIRED TO CONSTRUCT WATER MAIN SHALL BE INCLUDED IN WATER MAIN CONSTRUCTION. B. A MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION OF 18 INCHES IS REQUIRED AT ALL WATER MAIN CROSSINGS WITH SANITARY SEWER OR STORM SEWER. 9. UTILITY SERVICES TYPICALLY TERMINATE 5' OUTSIDE BUILDING WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN OR NOTED. 10. ALL MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 11. ALL WATER PIPE TO BE DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) CLASS 52 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. BURIED WITH A MINIMUM OF 7.5 FEET OF COVER e 12. ALL SANITARY SLIVER SERVICE PIPE TO BE PVC SDR -26 UNLESS OTHERWISE i NOTED. 13. COORDINATE ALL SANITARY, STORM AND WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE CITY OF EDINA ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (952927.8861). 14. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS —BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. V � � \A,b CONNECT TO EXISTING 8�D\ WATERMAIN WITH WET TAP ANDVALVE � r\ Utility legend PROPERTY LINE -- - - - - -- / 1 CURB AND GUTTER ►�4► il' -- - - - -- - FM SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN M� STORM SEWER I WATER MAW - _.____ __. __ ►--rF HYDRANT sar / -- wa UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC I w OVERHEAD ELECTRIC - Rn UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE I PROPOSED G OVERHEAD TELEPHONE - - - - - -- - - -- - TELEPHONE FIBER OPTIC rn CABLE TELEVISION —►►►— ONT DNTR C TO C R ►� GATE VALVE COORDI ATE .. H� LIGHT POLE ® CONNE TON WITH ' SEPARATION UTutY PRO ER V � � \A,b CONNECT TO EXISTING 8�D\ WATERMAIN WITH WET TAP ANDVALVE � r\ Utility legend EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th STREET WEST EDINA, MN s ® mmsv mua s�mam I11111IMLmed Men Hansen Architectural -Up mw GfOUp mm Trr Oob cr o. a r52421/m Orr 1m r� altardTrw ■rAm w 55111 .mlvp+r®me 1 HEREDY CERTIFY THAT TNIS PLAN WAS PREPARED Or NS OR UNDER W DIRECT SUPERVISION. AND THAT I .UI A DULY LICENSED PHOPESSl0NAL ENGDIERA UNDER THE LASS Or THE STATE Or YINNESOTL CHRISTOPHER J. CARD.L PE REWSmuffaN NOMESR 43360 WS517IO0D SHAM BE DEEMED TINS AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF 7WEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS Or SSRVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAC STArumr AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS. INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS NO. DESCALPTION DATE PROIELT NUMBER- 2007120500 DRAWN Hr. CHICABD BY C. CARDA DATC 4.28.08 COMPUTER DntamRT.. PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL N IT C5 PROPERTY LINE -- - - - - -- EASEMENT LINE CURB AND GUTTER ►�4► SANITARY SEWER -- - - - -- - FM SANITARY SEWER FORCE MAIN M� STORM SEWER - - I— WATER MAW - _.____ __. __ ►--rF HYDRANT sar GAS -- wa UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC OVERHEAD ELECTRIC - Rn UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE .. .. OVERHEAD TELEPHONE - - - - - -- - - -- - TELEPHONE FIBER OPTIC rn CABLE TELEVISION —►►►— DRAW TILE ►� GATE VALVE FLARED END SECTION (WITH RIPRAP) .. H� LIGHT POLE ® VERTICAL UTILITY SEPARATION EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th STREET WEST EDINA, MN s ® mmsv mua s�mam I11111IMLmed Men Hansen Architectural -Up mw GfOUp mm Trr Oob cr o. a r52421/m Orr 1m r� altardTrw ■rAm w 55111 .mlvp+r®me 1 HEREDY CERTIFY THAT TNIS PLAN WAS PREPARED Or NS OR UNDER W DIRECT SUPERVISION. AND THAT I .UI A DULY LICENSED PHOPESSl0NAL ENGDIERA UNDER THE LASS Or THE STATE Or YINNESOTL CHRISTOPHER J. CARD.L PE REWSmuffaN NOMESR 43360 WS517IO0D SHAM BE DEEMED TINS AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF 7WEIR RESPECTIVE INSTRUMENTS Or SSRVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAC STArumr AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS. INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENTS NO. DESCALPTION DATE PROIELT NUMBER- 2007120500 DRAWN Hr. CHICABD BY C. CARDA DATC 4.28.08 COMPUTER DntamRT.. PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL N IT C5 3 0 h O N 'n O O N m n 'o N M C p0 E.pS (EOTEiRL LINER v(f" (TYPE M -DOT '•C� 3733 2005) 12' MINIMUM DEPTH 1' - 3- WASHED ROCK J� JM �OTM 18' MINIMUM CUT OFT BERM TO 1d MIMMIZE RUNOFF FROM SITE NOTE: ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHOULD BE A MINIMUM THICKNESS O 1.0' AND CONTAIN MAXIWM SIDE SLOPES OF 4:1. ROUX ENTRANCE SHOULD E INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED REGULARLY. ROCK ENTRANCE LENGTH MAY NEED TO BE EXTENDED IN CLAY SOILS. W IABT KKCYt7@ ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE CD05 GATE BOX BASE TO 1E51 ON CONCRETE BLOCKS 4' ABOVE PPE OR VALVE SET RE 1/4' -1/2" BELOW FINISHED SURFACE COMPACTED BACKFILL *MLN. BACH(FILL PAQ gCP(1DT fICrAR MECHANICAL JOINT 4' U.N. FITTING W/ RETAINER GLANDS STANDARD VALVE ROY TILER SERIES 8860, ITEM G OR EQUAL NOTE 1. GATE VALVE CLOCKWISE OPENNG ON SPW1 SYSTEM OPENING 2. COUNTERCLOCKWISE OPENING ON NORTH ST. PAUL SYSTEM VALVES CONFORMING TO AWWA C -509. 3. 12' WATER MAINS AND LARGER REQUIRE BUTTERFLY VALVES IGATE VALVE 48' DNA. CRETEX 1/2' R E B WITH CATTIER s' CONCRETE WALK WITH ROUND OR . 36' SQUARE CONTRACTION JOINTS EVERY NNNG S' AND EXPANSI ON MNTS EVERY 100' OR AT 9(r 1 487 INTERSECTIONS FINISH GRADE SEE PLAN 1 2Z CROSS SLOPE - c 0 0 0,,10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6' YIN. CRETEX TYPE 43M SECTION OR APPROVED EQUAL 4' MNDOT 2211 CLASS I 8616 18' 26' IOGX CRUSHED STONE AGGREGATE 8624 24- 32' BASE PRIVATE CONCRETE SIDEWALK EXTRA STRENGTH FILTER FABRIC TYPE H - ADD WRE MESH BACKING TYPE M - ADD WIRE MESH AND HAY BALES pp STEEL OR �'� POST �lF1 V!I 0'-0' MAIL SPAICNG WM WOM SUPPORT FENCE 6' -O' MAIL SPACING IN OUT WPM SUPPORT FENCE PONOING HEIGHT 9' MAIL FILTER FABRIC. RECOMMENDED ATTACK SECURELY STORAGE HEIGHT STEEL OR TO UPSTREAM VC—P11-EL' T 38' HIGH MAX SIDE OF POST. WOOD POST RUNOFF 12' MIN. 4'm' TRENCH 12' ION. WIM COMPACTED BACIOILL BARD ALTTRNATE 0.1 111L WTH NAIL TRENGI WH VEL BAR3(FILL NOTE 1. INSPECT AND REPAIR FENCE AFTER EACH STORM EVENT AND REMOVE SEDIMENT MEN NECESSARY. 2. REMOVED SEDIMENT SHALL BE DEPOSI IEII TO AN AREA THAT WILL NOT CONTRIBUTE SEDIMENT OFF -SITE AND CM BE PERMANENTLY STABXJZE0. 3, SILT FENCE SHALL BE PLACED ON SLOPE CONTOURS TO MAXIMIZE PONDING EFFICIENCY. SILT FENCE "(AIn 011 cum, ELM MANHOLE COVER TO 3' R 48' DNA. CRETEX 1/2' R E B WITH CATTIER MINIMUM O- TWO 2' ROUND OR . 36' SQUARE ADJUSTING RINGS NNNG CONCRETE G 1 487 I j271 BASIN MMHO.E 1 NOTE: EXPANSION JOINT SPACING IS 100' AND BASE TO BE _ cNNn T— A T CRETEX TYPE 43M SECTION OR APPROVED EQUAL A-A 1. BASE TO BE GROUTED TO FORM A SMOOM INVERT TO OUTLET 2. PIPE CUT -OUTS O BE LOCATED WHERE REOUNED . 3. SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR CASTING TYFIL I I STANDARD MANHOLE 5703 ED w r OF .> FRONT FOIE JS'_Nr OF CURB .BRINK - I ( ' M T FINE 3 'OF GUNS 4' 1 L 6' Y w AM VIEW OF DIAGONAL RAMP CNRB tN GXB Y ' 4'0" DESIRABLE SINE OTTER �± -- - 1/2' PIRTKIM® O® FT./FT. ON FLYTTER� JOHt FINER CONCRETE wA1K MATERIAL SECTION MA IS S- NOTO W E].EVATON OC RAMP I. PROVIDE A RELATVFIV' MT C X 4' UNDING BEHIND THE PEDESTRIAN RAMP. 2. WHEN A MEDIAN S NOT WDE ENOUGH FOR TWO PEDESTRM RAMPS AND A 4W' LANDING BETWEEN THEM. ME PEDESTRIAN CROSSNO SHALL BE CUT THROUGH THE MEGAN AT STREET LEVEL 3. ADA REQUIRED TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL BE Y UK M DIRECTION OF TRAVEL AND SHELL EXTEND ME ML MIN CY OR C TVPJ OF THE CURB RAMP. THIS 7 Or BY S Y OR C a' .OM (1YP.) TWUINGTIED OCAS AREA SHALL CONTRAST MSVA.Y WITH THE AOM;EMT WALKING SU FA THE ENTIRE 1HHNGTED DOLE AREA SHALL E A DARK GRAY COLOR AND THE ADJACENT SIDEWALK SHALL BE A "W HI OR LIGHT GRAY CEMENT COLOR. F PRIOR APPROVAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY THE CITY FOR llE ADJACENT SIDEWALK O E A DANK COLOR. ME TRINGTED DOME AREA 9MU. E A U04T GRAY COLD. 4 TE RAMP AREA TILL E PAD FOR AS w4K THE TRUNCATED DOME AREA SNARL E CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL Wr ALY� PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP 909 NOTE, CI) ALL GEOTE"LE USED FOR INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE MONOFILAMENT IN BOTH DIRECTIONS. (MEETMC ..DOT SPEC. 3733 GEOTEXTLLES) FINISHED SIZE (INCLUOING POCKETS) SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 10' AROUND THE PERIMETER TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE OR REMOVAL 3 DO NOT INSTALL PROTECTION IN NETS SHALLOWER THAN 30'. ME INSTALLED BAG SH AU HAVE A MRWUM SIDE CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE INLET WALLS AND ME BAG MEASUFIED AT THE BOTTOM O THE OVERFLOW HOLES OF 3. WHERE NECESSARY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CUNOH THE BAG (USING PLASTIC DP TIES) TO ACHIEVE THE 3- CLEARANCE. 4 TO M T04 THE PLAN TO EATON THE RAN AND DIMEN90N LENGTH AND MOTH. 2 USE REPAR OR STEEL ROD FOR REMOVAL (FOR INLETS WITH CAST CURB 1 BOX. REPLACE ROD WITH WOOD 2' X C) . EXTEND MINIMUM DwBIE /0' BEYOND GRATE ON SIT sEA Is ALL BOTH 90ES. SECU RE 10 MOUND SIDE PIECES GRATE WITH WIRE OR AND GM FLAP PLpsTC llEs POCKETS FRONT, BALL, Vti 2' i 4 HOE BOTTOM 70 BE SHALL BE HEAT MADE COON SINGLE CUT INTO ALL PIECE OF FABRIC FOUR SIDE PANELS. STORY DRAIN FILTER BAG INSERT GD10 Call 48 HDMra before d1991n6 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651- 454 -0002 Mn. Tall Free T -BOG -252 -1166 SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS AISC NANUAL OF STEEL GONSM TION . BM EDITION. AWS STRUCTURAL WELDMO COOS - STEEL . 0.1.1 -94. 29 CM 1926 - OSIA SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS DES(GN LOADS ALLOWABLE AXLE WEIGHT LOAD n/e SAFETY FACTOR n/c WATER FLOW RATE 0.476 cf. O 3' 11— (THROUGH POLYESTER SLEEVE) MAXIMUM OVERFLOW RATE 2.14 cfs O 15' MWH TER ASSEMBLY I ,CURB 1. STT TRE 1. SET CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL AFTER CURB k CUTTER IS INSTALLED. MAINTAIN UN11L SITE IS POLYESTER SLEEVE STABILIZED. W ROAD DRAIN CG-23 -..CO* CURB INLET PROTECTION I GD12 aNnoN AS WE 'ED BY ENONEM . SURF O BE PAID AS 6' CONK APRON TO BE PAID AS 6 CONC D W. SECTION 1 A Iw I ENTRANCE THOU CURB AND �� GUTTER 90.7 3' R 1/2' R Y v 6 J' R 5LOPE 3 =Pd Flt . �� '. • - X IS Y 1 NOTE: EXPANSION JOINT SPACING IS 100' YIN, 3' CL. 5 UNDER CAL cNNn T— A T 8612 12' 20' 8616 18' 26' 8624 24- 32' 6 TO REC SES POLVE HW-ENE S TO EFO. vCLVEMRFNE coWR). LAST AGV>� 2 O TOP OF PAKOF i. 86 STYLE CURB AND (.UTTER 5101 Q 24' Du CONCETE Call 48 HDMra before d1991n6 GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651- 454 -0002 Mn. Tall Free T -BOG -252 -1166 SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS AISC NANUAL OF STEEL GONSM TION . BM EDITION. AWS STRUCTURAL WELDMO COOS - STEEL . 0.1.1 -94. 29 CM 1926 - OSIA SAFETY AND HEALTH STANDARDS DES(GN LOADS ALLOWABLE AXLE WEIGHT LOAD n/e SAFETY FACTOR n/c WATER FLOW RATE 0.476 cf. O 3' 11— (THROUGH POLYESTER SLEEVE) MAXIMUM OVERFLOW RATE 2.14 cfs O 15' MWH TER ASSEMBLY I ,CURB 1. STT TRE 1. SET CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL AFTER CURB k CUTTER IS INSTALLED. MAINTAIN UN11L SITE IS POLYESTER SLEEVE STABILIZED. W ROAD DRAIN CG-23 -..CO* CURB INLET PROTECTION I GD12 aNnoN AS WE 'ED BY ENONEM . SURF O BE PAID AS 6' CONK APRON TO BE PAID AS 6 CONC D W. SECTION 1 A Iw I ENTRANCE THOU CURB AND �� GUTTER 90.7 EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th STREET WEST EDINA, MN ". WIAWwYIIY.�R E�rlw RIM CUED �A M® �INOII �� Mn Hanson ArrJliteehlr" a.", I ®T.M. aNWC +0. T. ram?= SIN, 211 Fa ESLNAIM W1p* W Mal a I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN HAS PREPARED BY M8 OR UNDER NIY DIRER SUPERVISION. AND THAT I AY A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNRSOr6 CRRISOPBeR J. Ci m PE RECISTRAITON NUMBER: 43360 WESTWOOD SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECrrm INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW. STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHT'S. INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMEMES. 90. DESCRIPTION DATE PROPER NUMBER 2007120500 DRAWN Br' QRCHEO Br. G GARDA DAFT: 4.28.08 COMPUTER DIRECTORY. GENERAL DETAILS CITY SUBMITTAL N T C6 .' utAMETUR STO. Sn. 6 PPE CONCRETE FILLED. O DRIVE-MRU ONLY, B' O ALL TNCR LOCATIONS MCUmwc UTUTES. 1 TRASH ENQOSURF. AND SPRINKLER RISERS Ni PROVIDE 1/4- WELDED .o �N CLOSURE RATE AT BOTTOM. (PANTED EXPOSED PPE :1g 6 TO REC SES POLVE HW-ENE S TO EFO. vCLVEMRFNE coWR). 2 O TOP OF PAKOF i. Q 24' Du CONCETE I H rotocwtw . USE SONOT SE FORM. H I 31Y OuMEI wDER 4 DI ER HOOPS. 1W COP. CENT BOTTOM AND CENTER. 5 O6 saD wmanARED SGL H Q PROME MICH. SMOOTH cp_ L_J i CONCRETE FNL9K BOLLARD 918 EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th STREET WEST EDINA, MN ". WIAWwYIIY.�R E�rlw RIM CUED �A M® �INOII �� Mn Hanson ArrJliteehlr" a.", I ®T.M. aNWC +0. T. ram?= SIN, 211 Fa ESLNAIM W1p* W Mal a I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN HAS PREPARED BY M8 OR UNDER NIY DIRER SUPERVISION. AND THAT I AY A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNRSOr6 CRRISOPBeR J. Ci m PE RECISTRAITON NUMBER: 43360 WESTWOOD SHALL BE DEEMED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESPECrrm INSTRUMENTS OF SERVICE AND SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAW. STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHT'S. INCLUDING COPYRIGHTS OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMEMES. 90. DESCRIPTION DATE PROPER NUMBER 2007120500 DRAWN Br' QRCHEO Br. G GARDA DAFT: 4.28.08 COMPUTER DIRECTORY. GENERAL DETAILS CITY SUBMITTAL N T C6 C DECIDUOUS A TREES 7 INS HONEYLOCUST Gledimia uiaenlhos ", Irlmmb' e' 3 /2' CAL B68 SINGLE LEADER 8 7 REDMOND LINDEN TdW eAmdma 512' CAL. B8B SINGLE LEADER C J - FALLGOLD BLACK ASH Frwdm n' F 212'CAL BAs SINGLE LEADER D 60 SUGAR MAPLE Am saadranan 312' CAL S&B SINGLE LEADER E 7 AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE Am It hemr l 410 CAL B&B SINGLE LEADER F 2 HACKBERRY Gems oeddwitdi5 21/2 CAL BAB SINGLE LEADER G 1/ WHITESPIRE BIRCH Bebda paperylma Wldtespim 12' -14' HT. B&B CLUMP CONIFEROUS SH CA 15 SKYROCKET JUMPER Ju tp—am Io —Skv=W B'HT. POT SPACINGPERPLAN CB Se SCANDIA JUNIPER Junlpi —wbina 5®rldla' 30'SPRD POT PLANT42'O.C. GC 139 EMERALD SPREADER YEW Taxus --data MorOW _ 124' POT I POT PLANT 48' O.C. GRASSES GA 20 FEATHER REED GRASS annrwnaua vm. 01 CONT CONIFEROUS TREES I PLANT O.C. GB M \ � \ \ '� � H 1 BALSAM FIR ADbs balmnee 8' so PUWT GC J - RUSHMORENWORVITAE opddmftr*VAhRVW IF BSB I merAaameatsmcCrurvnrH ymerecrereoaroorwmam 0 8' 16' 32' ® POT \ \ \ \ \ GO 60 ORNAMENTAL TREES ue Wrdpl, K 2 VELVET PILLAR CRABAPPLE kra Ma VOW Wlaf 2 CAL B&B SINGLE LEADER 12 HT. B&B CLUMP GE 572 BLUE FESCUE FesMa 17 h Blue' #ICONT L JAPANESE TREE LILAC S reV d to I PLANT 2' O.C. -4 -HT SCALE: 1/16'm 1' -0' NORTH CONIFEROUS SH CA 15 SKYROCKET JUMPER Ju tp—am Io —Skv=W B'HT. POT SPACINGPERPLAN CB Se SCANDIA JUNIPER Junlpi —wbina 5®rldla' 30'SPRD POT PLANT42'O.C. GC 139 EMERALD SPREADER YEW Taxus --data MorOW _ 124' POT I POT PLANT 48' O.C. GRASSES GA 20 FEATHER REED GRASS annrwnaua vm. 01 CONT IPOT I PLANT O.C. GB M EVERGOLD PALM SEDGE Caren h.. E N CONT POT PUWT GC 22 LITRE BLUE STEM Schir d*kan d= Wrkbkm K 01 CANT POT PLANT 2 O C. GO 60 PRAIRIE DROPSEED ue Wrdpl, a1 CONT IPOT I PLANT Z D.C. GE 572 BLUE FESCUE FesMa 17 h Blue' #ICONT IPOT I PLANT 18' O.C. PERENNIALS: PA SEDUM MIX - 990 EUONYMUS WINTER C PERI Ewn forwrlel 24-HT. I POT I PLANT Z D.C. PB 60 HAPPY RETURNS DAYLILY Nemmaralks Tiappy Rewms' 8' Dla. POT PLANT 16' O. C. PC 74 SIBERIAN IRIS Irb siDedo Ceasah Brghel W CONT POT PLAM 78' O.G. PD 23 BLACK -EYED SUSAN I RWbmJda Takeo' 1 Gel. I POT I PLANT 1B' O.C. PE 46 ROCKY TOP CONEFLOWER I Eddn— tempss000nab'Redry Top' 1 Gel. I POT I PLANT 2' O.C. PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER SCHEDULE. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY QUANTITIES. PLANTING SCHEDULE PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN SYM SCIENTIFIC NAME FOLIAGE FEATURE 1 BLOOM COLOR I INSTALLED HGT. PLAN PATTERN GREEN SEDUM MIX - 990 - - -- -- -- •• - - -- :. .; S SB Sedum 'BmLram Ad~ S2 REEN YELLOW WHT S3 Sedum um'hnme GRE YELLOW -S HT S4 Sedwn re0exran Bwe mce BLUE{iREEN YELLOW I r HT, SS Sedum Westre, I GOLD-YELLOW YELLOW 3'HT. 4'E HT. Sedum sexnn tare I GREEN YELLOW -4 -HT RED SEDUM MIX- SSS SO. F7. - - -- -- -- •• - - -- SB Sedum 'BmLram Ad~ R -- 59 Sedum s urlum f uT DEEP MAROON PINK 7'4' HT. -_ — = —_ _ _ _ _ 1 Sedum rlum SUlpfrlxlfambleT D 'e Bbod I BRONZE PINK I r HT, -_ --_ ----- - S71 Sedum spurlum Vm Doo' DARK RED I PINK 4'E HT. GREEN ROOF SCHEDULE EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL MC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th STREET W. EDINA/ MN Mn Hanson ArctufectunV --, �IDUp ®urara.rQ m NII07m oft= a maTdW gWlrr Nrl �Wt,.O�� I HUM COM DIM DOS OOC AOU WAS PAIMRED BY ME OR UNDER w DISCI SsDAmL AND DIRT I w A DULY LlCDW 1AN13:1PE ARQIM UNDER TIE LOS OF RE SWE OF MNNB A. DVOd FAIMR. FASA LIB NUMBER: 12538 TIE MIDST SIM SE ®m TIE AIDIDRS AO 01111etS OF TIER RESFOW IM MM OF SM= AD SHILL RWM ILL DOSOI LA( SWUM AO DDEM RIMMED RIM MDUOIB DDPM1B OF TIE RDIQm DOpA100% In DESC�ION OAIE RG6T NI®b m0000L IM QNZIV a BE P. LARSON O® BF. L MILRQOQ ASLA QTR 43LIM amvm re�Iaoc rim I� CO M.Aer COW PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN & SCHEDULE CITY SUBMITTAL N ® L1 GENERAL NOTES t LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE SITE AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS RELATING TO THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF WORK 2 LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SRALL VERIFY PUN LAYOUT AND BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT DISCREPANCIES WHICH MAY COMPROMISE THE DESIGN OR INTENT OF THE LAYOUT. 3 LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE WORK AND MATERIALS SUPPLIED. 4 LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT EXISTING ROADS, CURBS/GUTTERS. TRAILS, TREES, LAWNS AND SITE ELEMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. DAMAGE TO SAME SHALL BE REPAIRED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER 5 LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALIGNMENT AND LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GRADE UTILITIES AND PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PROTECTION FOR SAME BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS (MINIMUM 10- CLEARANCE} 6 LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING INSTALLATION WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS WORKING ON SITE 7 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED SO THAT TRENCHES DO NOT CUT THROUGH ROOT SYSTEMS OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. 8 EXISTING CONTOURS, TRAILS, VEGETATION, CURBIGUTTFR AND OTHER ELEMENTS ARE BASED UPON INFORMATION SUPPLIED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY OTHERS. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF SAME 9 HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL ALIGNMENT OF PROPOSED WALKS. TRAILS OR ROADWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO FIELD ADJUSTMENT REQUIRED TO CONFORM TO LOCALIZED TOPOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND TO MINIMIZE TREE REMOVAL AND GRADING. CHANGES IN ALIGNMENT AND GRADES MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION.. 10 LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW THE SITE FOR DEFICIENCIES IN SITE CONDITIONS WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT ESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL OR WARRANTY. UNDESIRABLE SITE CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF WORK 11 LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ONGOING MAINTENANCE OF NEWLY INSTALLED MATERIALS UNTIL TIME OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION REPAIR OF ACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR PRIOR TO SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR 12 EXISTING TREES OR SIGNIFICANT SHRUB MASSINGS FOUND ON SITE SHALL BE PROTECTED AND SAVED UNLESS NOTED TO BE REMOVED OR ARE LOCATED IN AN AREA TO BE GRADED. QUESTIONS REGARDING EXISTING PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO REMOVAL 13 EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. UPON DIRECTION OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. SHALL BE FERTILIZED AND PRUNED TO REMOVE DEAD WOOD. DAMAGED AND RUBBING BRANCHES. LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION NOTES 14 LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR THE SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION INSPECTION OF LANDSCAPE AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING FINAL PAY REQUEST. 15 LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT REPRODUCIBLE AS-BUILT DRAWING(S) OF LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION, IRRIGATION AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS UPON COMPLETION OF CONSTRUCTION INSTALLATION AND PRIOR TO SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION. GRADING NOTES 1 ROUGH GRADING AND FINISHED GRADING TO BE DONE BY OTHERS EXCEPT WHERE NOTED. 2 FILL/CUT AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A 1% MINIMUM GRADE AWAY FROM BUILDINGS WITHIN LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION. 3 SALVAGE TOPSOIL FROM THE EARTHWORK AREAS AS APPROPRIATE OR AS DIRECTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND STOCKPILE FOR REUSE IN LOCATION APPROVED BY OWNER 4 ADD EROSION CONTROL MEASURES IF GRADES GREATER THAN 3:1 OR IF CONDITIONS WARRANT. REFER TO MPCA SPECIFICATIONS FOR EROSION CONTROL 5 LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT PUBLIC UTILITIES FOR LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE IF DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER 6 LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PROPER EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AS REQUIRED TO INSURE THAT EROSION IS KEPT TO AN ABSOLUTE MINIMUM. 7 PROVIDE TEMPORARY COVERING FOR CATCH BASINS AND MAN HOLES UNTIL FINISHED GRADING B COMPLETE 8 CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT DRAINAGE BASINS AS NEEDED. 9 PERIMETER SILT FENCE AND ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REFER TO MNDOT SPECIFICATIONS FOR AGGREGATE BASE AND SILT FENCE 10 CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL CATCH BASIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PER MPCA (MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY) SPECS. 11 WITHIN SEVEN DAYS OF FINISHED SITE GRADING. DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH SEED, SOD, MULCH OR ROCK BASE. 12 CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES, INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF ACCUMULATED SILT IN FRONT OF SILT FENCES AND EXCESS SEDIMENT IN PROPOSED CATCH BASINS. FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION. 13 LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED AND DISPOSE OF OFF SITE. 6 +1! N= DRIP LINE - - 4' SNOW FENCE WITH POSTS @ - B•O.C.(MAX)AT DRIP LINE OF - OUTER MOST - BRANCHES. REFER TO PLAN , FOR LOCATIONS ' 4' SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. REMOVE VEGETATION. - PERSPEC- BEFORE INSTALLING ELEVATION MULCH. PLAN NOTE: TREE PROTECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR AS REQUIRED TO ENSURE SURVIVABILITY OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. NO HEAVY EQUIPMENT SHALL BE STORED WITHIN THE TREE DRIP LINE AS DESIGNATED ABOVE 1 TREE PROTECTION sale OIL•. r" - ...2 -.. - LANDSCAPE DETAILS 3 COMPACTED ORGANIC MULCH. TO BE PLACED 60 DAYS AFTER TREE PLANTING UPON CUTTING OF S DIA SOD RING. MULCH TO BE LEVEL WITH FINISHED GRADE DO NOT PLACE MULCH IN CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK SOD TO BE PLANTED UP TO TRUNK OF TREE W EDGECONDmON VARIES, SEE PLAN COMPACT PLANTING SOIL TO 85 PERCENT OF MAXIMUM DRY UNIT WEIGHTACCORDING TO ASTM D 698 UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE DIG RANTING PR4'TO6' _ DEEPER THAN ROOT BALL REMOVE BURLAP, TWINE, ROPE AND WIRE FROM TOP HALF OF ROOT BALL PLANTING NOTES 1 NO PLANTS WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL FINAL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA 2 PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, ANSI Z60.1. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. DECIDUOUS SHRUBS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 5 CANES AT THE SPECIFIED HEIGHT. ORNAMENTAL TREES SHALL HAVE NO V CROTCHES AND SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 3' FEET ABOVE THE ROOT BALL STREET AND BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN F ABOVE PAVED SURFACE. 3 PLANT SYMBOLS ON PLAN DRAWING TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER PLANT SCHEDULE IF DISCREPANCIES IN QUANTITIES EXIST. SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER NOTES. 4 PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE LOCATED AND STAKED AS SHOWN ON PLAN. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST APPROVE STAKING OF PLANT MATERIAL PRIOR TO DIGGING. 5 NO PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVAL IS GRANTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF BID. 6 ADJUSTMENTS IN LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS MAY BE NEEDED IN FIELD. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED PRIOR TO ADJUSTMENT OF PLANTS. 7 PLANT MATERIALS TO BE INSTALLED PER PLANTING DETAILS. 8 PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE FERTILIZED UPON INSTALLATION WITH DRIED BONE MEAL, OTHER APPROVED FERTILIZER MIXED IN WITH THE PLANTING SOIL PER THE MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS OR MAY BE TREATED FOR SUMMER AND FALL INSTALLATION WITH AN APPLICATION OF GRANULAR 1045 OF 12 OZ. PER 2.5' CALIPER TREE AND 6 OL PER SHRUB WITH AND ADDITIONAL APPLICATION OF 10410 THE FOLLOWING SPRING IN THE TREE SAUCER 9 PLANTING AREAS RECEIVING GROUND COVER PERENNIALS, ANNUALS OR VINES SHALL RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 17 DEPTH OF PLANTING SOIL CONSISTING OF 45 PARTS TOPSOIL. 45 PARTS SCREENED COMPOST AND 10 PARTS SAND OR AS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. 10 TREE WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE TWO-WALLED PLASTIC SHEETING APPLIED FROM TRUNK FLARE TO FIRST BRANCH. WRAP SMOOTHAARKED DECIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN THE FALL PRIOR TO DECEMBER 1 AND REMOVE WRAPPING AFTER MAY 1. 11 Ye THICK STEEL EDGER TO BE USED TO CONTAIN SHRUBS, PERENNIALS AND ANNUALS WHERE PLANTING BED MEETS SOD UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 12 ANNUAL AND PERENNIAL PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE 3' DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH NO WEED BARRIER 13 SHRUB BED MASSINGS TO RECEIVE 4' DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH WITH SPUN -BONDED POLYESTER WEED BARRIER 14 CONIFEROUS TREES ARE TO RECEIVE 4' DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH AND SHALL HAVE NO MULCH IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH THE TREE TRUNK 15 MAINTENANCE STRIPS. WHERE ILLUSTRATED. TO HAVE EDGER AND MULCH AS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS OR IN SPECIFICATIONS. NOTE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE WARRANTY PERIOD. WRAP TREE TRUNKS ONLY UPON APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. SEE SPECIFICATION SECTION RELATED j TO EXTERIOR PLANTING EACH TREE SHALL BE PLANTED SUCH THAT THE ROOT FLARE B VISIBLE AT THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL. IF THE ROOT FLARE B NOT VISIBLE, THE SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED IN A LEVEL MANNER FROM THE ROOT BALL TO WHERE THE FIRST MAIN ORDER ROOT OT OA OR LARGER) EMERGES FROM THE TRUNK SET MAIN ORDER ROOT 1' HIGHER THAN ADJACENT GRADE DO NOT COVER TOP OF ROOT BALL WITH SOIL S DIAMETER MULCH RING WITH TOOLED JJNS VERTICAL EDGE TO BE CUT TO 3' BELOW FINISHED GRADE ONCE SOD HAS BEEN IN PLACE FOR 60 DAYS. 7jvs. SCARIFY SIDES OF TREE PIT �0 2T05 WITH SPADE BY HAND TO yTIMES P J4 BIND WITH PREPARED SOIL PLANTING PIT TO BE TWO TO FIVE TIMES THE DIAMETER OF ROOT BALL SLOPED TAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASE FIRMLY WITH FOOT PRESSURE SO THAT ROOT BALL DOES NOT SHIFT PLACE ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED OR COMPACTED SOIL iTREE PLANTING DETAIL Sri Q.Ya PREPARE SOIL FOR 16 LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL WARRANTY NEW PLANT MATERIAL THROUGH ONE CALENDAR YEAR FROM THE DATE OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION NO PARTIAL ACCEPTANCE WILL BE CONSIDERED. 17 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, THE APPROPRIATE DATES FOR SPRING PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLATION IS FROM THE TIME GROUND HAS THAWED TO JUNE 15. 18 CONIFEROUS PLANTING IS ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15 TO OCTOBER 1. FALL DECIDUOUS PLANTING IS ACCEPTABLE FROM THE FIRST FROST UNTIL NOVEMBER 15. ADJUSTMENTS TO PLANTING DATES MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. IRRIGATION NOTES 1 LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AN IRRIGATION LAYOUT PLAN AND SPECIFICATION AS PART OF THE SCOPE OF WORK SUBMIT LAYOUT PLAN AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ORDER AND/OR CONSTRUCTION IT SHALL BE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO INSURE THAT SODDEDISEEDED AND PLANTED AREAS ARE IRRIGATED PROPERLY, INCLUDING THOSE AREAS DIRECTLY AROUND AND ABUTTING BUILDING FOUNDATION. 2 LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM COMPLETE LIMITS OF IRRIGATION PRIOR TO SUPPLYING SHOP DRAWINGS. 3 LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN IRRIGATION SCHEDULE APPROPRIATE TO THE PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS AND TO PLANTED MATERIAL GROWTH REQUIREMENTS. 4 LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSURE THAT SOIL CONDITIONS AND COMPACTION ARE ADEQUATE TO ALLOW FOR PROPER DRAINAGE AROUND THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. UNDESIRABLE CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO BEGINNING OF WORK R SHALL BE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO INSURE PROPER SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE IN PLANTING AREAS. TURF NOTES 1 SOD AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE- 2 WHERE SOD ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED GRADE OF SODISEED SHALL BE HELD 1' BELOW SURFACE ELEVATION OF TRAIL, SLAB, CURB. ETC. 3 SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVE STAGGERED JOINTS. ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR IN DRAINAGE SWALES. SOD SHALL BE STAKED SECURELY. 4 UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, THE APPROPRIATE DATES FOR SPRING SEED 8 SOD PLACEMENT IS FROM THE TIME GROUND HAS THAWED TO NNE 15. 5 FALL SODDING IS ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15 TO NOVEMBER 1. FALL SEEDING IS ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15 TO SEPTEMBER 15. ADJUSTMENTS TO SODISEED PLANTING DATES MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. NOTE SEE SPECIFICATION SECTION RELATED TO EXTERIOR PLANTING 3' MULCH. DO NOT PLACE MULCH IN CONTACT WITH SHRUB STEM WEED BARRIER FABRIC EDGE CONDITION VARIES, SEE PLAN EDGING, SEE PLAN CONTAINER GROWN MATERIAL SHALL RAVE ROOTS HAND LOOSENED PLANTING SOIL FOR SHRUBS MIN. 4' DEEPER THAN ROOT BALL SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF ENTIRE BED WITH SPADE BY HAND TO BIND WITH PLANTING SOIL 3 SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL UNDISTURBED suBGRADE L2 " y1 . YQ �:.. 4 BULB PLANTING DETAIL REFER TO PUNTING PLAN FOR PLANT MATERIAL, SPACING INFORMATION MULCH, REFER TO PLANTING NOTES FINISHED GRADE, REFER TO PLAN DEPTH IS DETERMINED BY 25 TIMES SIZE OF BULB PLANTING SOB.. REFER TO PUNTING NOTES APPLY 1 TEASPOON OFBONEMEALTO PLANTING HOLE, EACH BULB. TYP. PREPARE SOIL FOR THE FNTIRF RFD NOTE: SEE SPECIFICATION SECTION RELATED TO EXTERIOR PLANTING 3' MULCH. DO NOT PLACE MULCH IN CONTACT WITH PLANT STEM _- EDGE CONDITION VARIES. SEE PLAN EDGING, SEE PLAN CONTAINER GROWN MATERIAL SHALL _ RAVE ROOTS HAND LOOSENED PLANTING SOIL FOR PERENNIALS SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF ENTIRE BED WITH SPADE BY HAND TO BIND WITH PLANTING SOIL UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE 5 PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL w"'Ew -Yo' -. . EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th STREET W. EDINA, MN Men Hansen Archftecturat G.mup GFOUp my."ara.rs a meta bb= a mwtw LLLW ■ elm .. - 1 !FIERY Cam TINT THS OONRDR Ewa PREPAED R LE OR tbW IIY MW WPOMMK AO TINT I AY A MY LIEIISRD LANDWA E AR09M VW TIE IAY6 OF THE STATE OF I W9=k Dk" FAM FMA LICENSE NAM 12538 11E A011IRT SHALL BE Om® TIE AIIIOB AD ONBL4 OF 71EH RMPEM t45RaMM OF 91RIL'E AN SHALL REIN ALL Ovlml li STAVION• AID OIEA MMNW ROTS MMUM O<iFi M OF 71E am= OOOlom NIL IILW>pm WE PrAw N1HR opoOOOd oA m-zzs N W. FLAMCK ARA OEM B,1 T. WHROOI, ASIA DOB 4>m2DOR OONRLR cimmm 1P m P"Kwa4m 00 ME" LYLL. PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE NOTES & DETAILS CITY SUBMITTAL ® "2 �I s 41 `v VARIES CFF Pf AN 1 MAINTENANCE STRIP - MINERAL MULCH FACE OF BUILDING 21? GREY DRESSER TRAP ROCK METAL EDGER WI STAKE FINISHED GRADE AND EDGE CONDITION VARIES - SEE PLAN FOR CONDITION. WEED BARRIER FABRIC SLOPE TO DRAIN TREE RELOCATION DETAIL SCALE: Ilr. I'd NOTE: THOROUGHLY WATER TREES TO BE RELOCATED EACH DAY FOR THREE DAYS PRIOR TO MOVING. COORDINATE TREE RELOCATION WORK WITH DEMOLITION 6 NEW CONSTRUCTION. REPAIR DAMAGE TO THE EXISTING LANDSCAPE RESULTING FROM EQUIPMENT TRACKS, COMPACTION, MATERIAL STORAGE, ETC. RETURN TO EXISTING CONDITIONS. COORDINATE WITH GENERAL CONTRACTOR FOR LOCATION OF STAGING AREA CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 612.454.0002 FOR FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES AT LEAST 38 HOURS PRIOR TO DIGGING. THE SIDES OF THE PLANTING HOLES SHOULD BE ROUGHED UP WITH A SHOVEL, RAKE, ETC., TO BREAK UP COMPACTION CAUSED BY THE SPADE TREES SHOULD BE PLACED AT OR SLIGHTLY HIGHER THAN THE ORIGINAL GRADE TO ALLOW FOR SETTLING. AFTER PLANTING, WORK LOOSE SOIL INTO THE AREA BETWEEN THE HOLE AND THE TREE PLUG. AND WATER THOROUGHLY. SET PLUMB REFER TO CIVIL SHEETS FOR EXTENTS OF DEMOLITION 8 REMOVALS. LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS THE 12 INCH WIDE VEGETATION-FREE ZONE WILL BE COMPOSED OF TYPICAL STONE BALLAST AT THE PARAPET INTERFACE OR CONCRETE PAVERS AT THE BUILDING WALL INTERFACE - SEE PLAN. CONTACT ROOFING MANUFACTURER FOR BALLAST DESIGN REQUIREMENTS. THESE ZONES ARE REQUIRED AT ROOF PERIMETERS. METAL EDGE RESTRAINT WILL BE USED AT V-F ZONE / GROWING MEDIA TRANSITIONS. VEGETATION FREE ZONE EXTEND AND SECURE MEMBRANE SYSTEM TO WALL AND RETAIN EDGE AS DIRECTED, PER 07120. SUPPORT PAVER CORNERS WIITH r TERIWTAB PEDESTAL SYSTEM BY WAUSAU TILE, INC. (800) 3888728 17 SO. X 7 TYPE 91 PAVER BY WAUSAU TILE. (800) 388A728. COLOR TO BE SELECTED FROM WAUSAUS STANDARD PALETTE- ROOF BALLAST, PER 07120. VEGETATED ROOF TRAY ASSEMBLY, PER 02980. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S DIRECTIONS. SEE PLAN FOR VEGETATIVE MDC FILTER FABRIC. PER 07120. r X 4- ALUMINUM T EDGE RESTRAINT. DRAINAGE MAT, PER 07120. BUILT -UP ROOF WITH MOISTURE RETENTION SYSTEM. PER 07120. ROOT BARRIER MEMBRANE PER 07120. STRUCTURAL SLAB ROOF PERIMETER EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th STREET W. EDINA, MN MHansen Henson AmJ1iDM -U, SM G/DUP m uft OYOrr! IN m m mmm ti.r m a� I HUM CUM THB TM DOMW WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY 00= SPEIMSICK AND PW 1 AM A QTLY UCDtZD WASCAPE ARGEIELT UNDER TIE WS OF M SDOE OF WIESM Bum FAKEER. FA.SIA I com NUwfm 12538 TEE MWIEff MU E RF1ED !IE MIOOYS MD ClINM OF THEIR REWIS E 1611RQERI4 OF EEC MD 91ALL REIIIM ALL OOriON UK SIAUIONY NO ORER OWNED RIM IIMIOD OARS OF TIE DDb® DOQIERM NO. CesarIIAI DOE FFAW 111@R @A1000d 40fA W44 01101 1D ►141510K ARA CEM BY! LYA*DL00, A9A COE �7EE001 COMPUTER G111113:1011m lL7D� EIe jeeMD5ID OaNO� Mrlrl Owe PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CII Y SUBMITTAL REFERTOPLANFORTOPAND ADHERE E ADE R CAP BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATIONS BLOCK T OVERHANG EACH SIDE, TYP. CUT CAP UNIT SPLIT OFF BACK 7 OFF BLOCK TO FIT, UNIFORMJOINTS ALONG UNITS ABOVE GRADE, CUT TO WALL RADIUS M. UNIFORM JOINTS ALONG WALL RADIUS, REFER TO PLAN FOR WALL LAYOUT VERS"OC MODULAR BLOCK AND CAP UNITS, SUBMIT COLOR SAMPLES TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO BIDDING Z REFER TO PLAN FOR PLANTING w REFER TO PLAN FOR PLANTING CONDITION, SLOPE TO DRAIN ;y CONDITION, SLOPE TO DRAIN AWAY FROM WALL O1 AWAY FROM WALL E DEPTH PLANTING SOIL FROM WALL, REFER TO PLANTING NOTES A I- DRAINAGE AAGGREGATE7 THICK WIDTH MINIMUM \ COMPACTED CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE —_ COMPACTED OR UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE �— — — l r 0 0 CfO p moo �C�o COMPACTION OF -_ v 0 AGGREGATE BASE, TESTING - I I AGENCY TO VERIFY 98% _ -_- PROCTOR DENSITY COMPACTION s ` SEGMENTAL WALL SECTION - FREESTANDING - _IL3_1 SCALL IWr•1'Q s.�.w WA -Fm M1g4-9 THE 12 INCH WIDE VEGETATION-FREE ZONE WILL BE COMPOSED OF TYPICAL STONE BALLAST AT THE PARAPET INTERFACE OR CONCRETE PAVERS AT THE BUILDING WALL INTERFACE - SEE PLAN. CONTACT ROOFING MANUFACTURER FOR BALLAST DESIGN REQUIREMENTS. THESE ZONES ARE REQUIRED AT ROOF PERIMETERS. METAL EDGE RESTRAINT WILL BE USED AT V-F ZONE / GROWING MEDIA TRANSITIONS. VEGETATION FREE ZONE EXTEND AND SECURE MEMBRANE SYSTEM TO WALL AND RETAIN EDGE AS DIRECTED, PER 07120. SUPPORT PAVER CORNERS WIITH r TERIWTAB PEDESTAL SYSTEM BY WAUSAU TILE, INC. (800) 3888728 17 SO. X 7 TYPE 91 PAVER BY WAUSAU TILE. (800) 388A728. COLOR TO BE SELECTED FROM WAUSAUS STANDARD PALETTE- ROOF BALLAST, PER 07120. VEGETATED ROOF TRAY ASSEMBLY, PER 02980. INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S DIRECTIONS. SEE PLAN FOR VEGETATIVE MDC FILTER FABRIC. PER 07120. r X 4- ALUMINUM T EDGE RESTRAINT. DRAINAGE MAT, PER 07120. BUILT -UP ROOF WITH MOISTURE RETENTION SYSTEM. PER 07120. ROOT BARRIER MEMBRANE PER 07120. STRUCTURAL SLAB ROOF PERIMETER EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th STREET W. EDINA, MN MHansen Henson AmJ1iDM -U, SM G/DUP m uft OYOrr! IN m m mmm ti.r m a� I HUM CUM THB TM DOMW WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY 00= SPEIMSICK AND PW 1 AM A QTLY UCDtZD WASCAPE ARGEIELT UNDER TIE WS OF M SDOE OF WIESM Bum FAKEER. FA.SIA I com NUwfm 12538 TEE MWIEff MU E RF1ED !IE MIOOYS MD ClINM OF THEIR REWIS E 1611RQERI4 OF EEC MD 91ALL REIIIM ALL OOriON UK SIAUIONY NO ORER OWNED RIM IIMIOD OARS OF TIE DDb® DOQIERM NO. CesarIIAI DOE FFAW 111@R @A1000d 40fA W44 01101 1D ►141510K ARA CEM BY! LYA*DL00, A9A COE �7EE001 COMPUTER G111113:1011m lL7D� EIe jeeMD5ID OaNO� Mrlrl Owe PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION DETAILS CII Y SUBMITTAL STATE HK� WAiNO. 02 C3 A111011maciffEll • , t f • - t � � � Y7, E �, ` I ' RWOWIO FAIRVIEW PARKING GARAGE I � '�---� FABtV¢iN � Y � t I ,., — • - - '�, � � SOUTH]VNE ' T � . C 1. - T7 - 1/r�p vA r _ Lu f 'f' COMMERCIAL i O, REGIONAL SITE PLAN 1' =60' -0' SITE DATA ZONING C) ASSIRCAnort EOSTING POD-1 PROPOSED: RND BUILDING SET BACKS FIRONT 35 OR BMW HEENT WHOEVER 6 GREATER ( VARIANCE REXAM) SIDE 20' OR BUILDING HEIGHT, WHOEVER 6 GREATER (VARIANCE EWDED) FEAR 20 OR BUILDING HEGHT, WHOEVER 6 GREATER (VARIANCE KUM) PARKING SET BACKS FROG 20' OR MUM HEIGHT. WHOEVER 6 CRFA7ER (VARIANCE EWDED) SIDE 10' OR MUM EIGHT. WHENEVER 6 GREATER (VARIANCE REQUIRED) REAR 10' OR BUDDED HEIGHT, WHICHEVER 6 GREATER (VARIANCE REWIRED) PARKING REQUIREMEMS PARIO G RAID MAC& OFFM 1200 FWS PHYSICIANS 73,386 C3 / 200 - 307 + 20 - 387 STALLS REQUIRED (BUIRDING SQUARE FOOTAGE PARNG GARAGE CORES FOf�SERS 4 LEVELS OF ODOM SPACE. IG STALL SIZE BSZ16' DRAE ASE 24' PARKING SUNNIM 387 STALLS REQUIRED 390 STALLS PROVIDED INCLUDING 8 ACME STALLS SM AREA CALCULATIONS Imam GREE16PILE: FGE W%ITDI BUILDING COVERAGE SPED YADYUN BUDDING HEIR: UNLINKED - TIED TO SEIBALI6 FLOOR AREA RAID (FIR): 1.0 (RWD) BUDDING AREA TOTAL 76,998 SF (DELUDES CORES FOR PS AND P6) BUILDING FOOTPRINT 20.072 3 DIPFRVI016 AREA TOTAL 61.311111 3 LANDSCAPE AREA TOTAL 2IL425 SF SITE AREA TOTAL 87.784 3 MUM FOOTPRINT/SIFE AREA--PERCENT MUM COVED 20.072 3/87.794 3- 233 OIPFRVIIX6/SKE AWA=PEB,•ED ORPERVIOUS 81j=l 3/87.784 3= 70.5 LANDSCAPE AREk/SIIE AREA PERETT GREDJ9'ACE 3AZ 3/87.794 3- 3011 WX BmLDUG ARFAM AWA- -FLOOR AREA RAID 76MO 3/07,784 3= .079 < 1.0 EDINA CROSSTOWN - MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th STREET W. EDINA, MINNESOTA Men Hansen ArcnnecDAYaR Group tm tid Of des o b m-®7Hm m = r. N620u110 G HOER! Cam THAT 116 PUVA SIONICKTION OR ROW VMS PREFMSED BY 1E OR UNDER W DIRECT SPERVOK NO DIT I w A m1Y UCDISED ARCHITECT DOER THE LAYS OF THE SEATS OF MODESOTII WAD( L TA®N, AN EISUTON NAAAR 20506 THE ARCH= SIPALL E OEE NED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RFSPSINE P6nIU ENI5 OF SERVICE AND SMALL REGN ALL CO ITN W, SWUIOITY AND OILER RESUIVE) RIGHTS DELUDING COPYRIGHTS W THE ATFAC ED DO(DIETDS ND- DESCRIPTION` OAT CRY SIDAROAI 40M FLEIRGY" FRImC SROs MY RVAITTAL RPASIM SID® PROJECT RIIUER 074IDOOAL IRON DY: SOUVER OmED W: M HANSPIS CUM OOE 47ROB cmd- R 0%17081': Qum- A AMRSINN1a aW REGIONAL SITE PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL x ® A1.0 cr r ) POW v OF FRANCE t l: Y i 1 t� i '2 �a ti fifi- r� - - - - 66TH STREET W. i!+ Tit i N... y a _ _ f r _ t . ,; Cr _ REGIONAL SITE PLAN 1' =60' -0' SITE DATA ZONING C) ASSIRCAnort EOSTING POD-1 PROPOSED: RND BUILDING SET BACKS FIRONT 35 OR BMW HEENT WHOEVER 6 GREATER ( VARIANCE REXAM) SIDE 20' OR BUILDING HEIGHT, WHOEVER 6 GREATER (VARIANCE EWDED) FEAR 20 OR BUILDING HEGHT, WHOEVER 6 GREATER (VARIANCE KUM) PARKING SET BACKS FROG 20' OR MUM HEIGHT. WHOEVER 6 CRFA7ER (VARIANCE EWDED) SIDE 10' OR MUM EIGHT. WHENEVER 6 GREATER (VARIANCE REQUIRED) REAR 10' OR BUDDED HEIGHT, WHICHEVER 6 GREATER (VARIANCE REWIRED) PARKING REQUIREMEMS PARIO G RAID MAC& OFFM 1200 FWS PHYSICIANS 73,386 C3 / 200 - 307 + 20 - 387 STALLS REQUIRED (BUIRDING SQUARE FOOTAGE PARNG GARAGE CORES FOf�SERS 4 LEVELS OF ODOM SPACE. IG STALL SIZE BSZ16' DRAE ASE 24' PARKING SUNNIM 387 STALLS REQUIRED 390 STALLS PROVIDED INCLUDING 8 ACME STALLS SM AREA CALCULATIONS Imam GREE16PILE: FGE W%ITDI BUILDING COVERAGE SPED YADYUN BUDDING HEIR: UNLINKED - TIED TO SEIBALI6 FLOOR AREA RAID (FIR): 1.0 (RWD) BUDDING AREA TOTAL 76,998 SF (DELUDES CORES FOR PS AND P6) BUILDING FOOTPRINT 20.072 3 DIPFRVI016 AREA TOTAL 61.311111 3 LANDSCAPE AREA TOTAL 2IL425 SF SITE AREA TOTAL 87.784 3 MUM FOOTPRINT/SIFE AREA--PERCENT MUM COVED 20.072 3/87.794 3- 233 OIPFRVIIX6/SKE AWA=PEB,•ED ORPERVIOUS 81j=l 3/87.784 3= 70.5 LANDSCAPE AREk/SIIE AREA PERETT GREDJ9'ACE 3AZ 3/87.794 3- 3011 WX BmLDUG ARFAM AWA- -FLOOR AREA RAID 76MO 3/07,784 3= .079 < 1.0 EDINA CROSSTOWN - MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th STREET W. EDINA, MINNESOTA Men Hansen ArcnnecDAYaR Group tm tid Of des o b m-®7Hm m = r. N620u110 G HOER! Cam THAT 116 PUVA SIONICKTION OR ROW VMS PREFMSED BY 1E OR UNDER W DIRECT SPERVOK NO DIT I w A m1Y UCDISED ARCHITECT DOER THE LAYS OF THE SEATS OF MODESOTII WAD( L TA®N, AN EISUTON NAAAR 20506 THE ARCH= SIPALL E OEE NED THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RFSPSINE P6nIU ENI5 OF SERVICE AND SMALL REGN ALL CO ITN W, SWUIOITY AND OILER RESUIVE) RIGHTS DELUDING COPYRIGHTS W THE ATFAC ED DO(DIETDS ND- DESCRIPTION` OAT CRY SIDAROAI 40M FLEIRGY" FRImC SROs MY RVAITTAL RPASIM SID® PROJECT RIIUER 074IDOOAL IRON DY: SOUVER OmED W: M HANSPIS CUM OOE 47ROB cmd- R 0%17081': Qum- A AMRSINN1a aW REGIONAL SITE PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL x ® A1.0 � w•-0' I nr� I w•-0' r t�I I I I I Zr ST j� TREE FIRST FLOOR PLAN 7/76• = ,• -O- �•-o• Ire ,2'-0• g� ,rte ,s-0' ,Mr-o- a'-a• ao' -0• I I I I I I I R ' I ■ ■ ■■ I I I I I I I I I •1 � w•-0' I nr� I w•-0' r t�I I I I I Zr ST j� TREE FIRST FLOOR PLAN 7/76• = ,• -O- �•-o• Ire ,2'-0• g� ,rte ,s-0' ,Mr-o- a'-a• ao' -0• I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th STREET W. EDINA, MINNESOTA Mn Hanson Amhftecturml Group Iam T.r. ar aor 0. im ma.2m Sa Mm ro maMNn q.r�'81 �sdeorllsm I NNW CERMY UK T,6 Fl^ 94XFIMM OR RUM WAS FROM M BY EE OR UNDER MY ORECr Ste. AND TW I AM A DULY LNFI® ARCH,ECr UNDER 7HE LAWS OF THE SG7E Or MVIESUM W.f L HMSEN. AM REGISTRATION N AGM 20508 THE ARGO W SMALL BE CEDED THE IWROIS AND OWNERS OF iHOR RESPECINE ISIRUMO S OF SERYCE AND SIMLL REMAN ALL COMMON W. SUJUIORY AND ODEIr RESERVED MOS. PCUMG CL IMUS OF THE ATTACHED OOGAEUM NO. OESUWM am MY SUBWAL 42M FKRMO ARY maNG 5-um GIY9.VOUL REVOW 5.2m PROW NUMIM 0743000.L CROWN BY RN/SGINS CHEGOD BY: M HAISFM9 OVM OOE 42&05 00,6,RFA ORECIQ&': Oa�elln hbk*jdlOm O'7 FIRST FLOOR PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL N ® A2.1 R ' I I I I I I I I EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th STREET W. EDINA, MINNESOTA Mn Hanson Amhftecturml Group Iam T.r. ar aor 0. im ma.2m Sa Mm ro maMNn q.r�'81 �sdeorllsm I NNW CERMY UK T,6 Fl^ 94XFIMM OR RUM WAS FROM M BY EE OR UNDER MY ORECr Ste. AND TW I AM A DULY LNFI® ARCH,ECr UNDER 7HE LAWS OF THE SG7E Or MVIESUM W.f L HMSEN. AM REGISTRATION N AGM 20508 THE ARGO W SMALL BE CEDED THE IWROIS AND OWNERS OF iHOR RESPECINE ISIRUMO S OF SERYCE AND SIMLL REMAN ALL COMMON W. SUJUIORY AND ODEIr RESERVED MOS. PCUMG CL IMUS OF THE ATTACHED OOGAEUM NO. OESUWM am MY SUBWAL 42M FKRMO ARY maNG 5-um GIY9.VOUL REVOW 5.2m PROW NUMIM 0743000.L CROWN BY RN/SGINS CHEGOD BY: M HAISFM9 OVM OOE 42&05 00,6,RFA ORECIQ&': Oa�elln hbk*jdlOm O'7 FIRST FLOOR PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL N ® A2.1 Si I- 8*-V 12'-0' 6'-0• 1r-0 1 ,O'-D I V- 30'-0 1 W-0 25 -0' �1 SECOND FLOOR PLAN /16• = 1._0. 4 Y a EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th STREET W. EDINA, MINNESOTA Men Hansen ArchRectural Group Im,►r Rr 0e R. L 2Rm7,D arm r. mmm IN I HEEa} Com THAT THIS KA 5 cmic IDN OR RUM WAS P EIV= H! ME OR ARDTD W OKCT SIVERwASRRL AM TINT I AN A DLLY IICEILSED ARDFW LI DEIR THE IARS OF THE SPATE OF EOIOEM MARK L HA/6flL M REGISTRUION IU16FIt 205 THE ARCHnm smi. EE ®Vm THE AUTHORS AND OWNERS OF THEIR RESFEUK I STRIIYENS OF SERYM AND SHALL RETAIN ALL CDWNOE LO, SURITORY AM OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS, WllIDG 07TRI IIRS OF THE ATTACHED DOOIAE/DS HO. IRON DATE OIY 91MDTAL 4-3405 RTDNNARY ERRING SIDm ORY SAWTTAE DV90N6 STOm FR&W way 0713ODCh& ONDI aN. RGS0D3 O EOED aL At HA SBUS OUVER DAIS 42LO OAENER ORETRORY: oom� AwsowaNalam D.. SECOND FLOOR PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL N ® A2.2 fi 53 T. THIRD FLOOR PLAN kA2.3 3/16- = 3' -0- `7 :0 EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th STREET W. EDINA, MINNESOTA Mn Hanson Architectural Group H® T r m bob W. T. M4W= sob Tm F. m®um •,.,b r ssm ...,r.pm.® I m m aRm nw TIE R^ ON DA f0 W WAS FRO*= W HE DN UNDER w ZCr 9�Aw�. APO THAT H A A our LEON ARGl= UNDER THE LAWS a THE STATE OF EEDaESOM MARK L HV3®L AA RMEWAON KAmrt 20506 THE A MOM SHALL HE Dmm THE NJDM AND OWNERS OF 7HEHR DESPECSAE 161PollENK OF SERM AND SHALL HEM AL COMMON LAW. SrATman AND CO EN DESERVED sans. ENZUOmc Hpvrs = Or THE ATTA HED DOaAEmS ND. DEZRFnON am ON SIAM53A LIDm HRL%VV Y r0®C SIM OHYSUd.O3AL AEVSONS SHOE WCJErr WIAM mawDaa DRAWN er. R OECED Er. AA HANSKMOUVE1 WE, 425M OOMPURR Ola=ORr: A�SIdH� rr•{ THIRD FLOOR PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL N ® A2.3 I I 1 — I I AI I I I 'ss I I 9Bd 3i I 4 — I V I I I I I I FOURTH FLOOR PLAN 1/16- _ ,' -0- I I I I q EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th STREET W. EDINA, MINNESOTA Men Hansen AmhftectutW Group ,® er am oer p ti NDAAYIm Mr m F. on4wm ,V.bw•5 I ROM Cum THAT THS HAM. SPENCU N GN FUM M � er WE OR WU NY OEM SPOhOW AND nuT I w A our EEDM ARLIEIECT GNMA nE LAOS OF THE STATE OF MNNMA. NAM( L WEEK AR FEWPA N NOHR 20506 THE AIDO %KL BE DMIED THE ALMM AND ONNETS OF nEIN NLPECmc 16TRA00 W SMYU AND DIAIL RUM ALL 0== W, smnnDIN NO GDER ROM OM MCUIDO CWYMG M OF nE ATfAOED DGCU NM N0. DESQRfgN DATE CRY 96MfTN 4-" FKBS94AU FKICM SON OTY 4®MRN WNW S M NOELT MMMR: G,43aDCA& GRAN GI: musom CHMKED BY: M HM@NN& QNS GALE 4]Em cowv ER OEELfQA': FOURTH FLOOR PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL N ® A2A4 4 SE I 4 x7 I I I I I I EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th STREET W. EDINA, MINNESOTA Men Hansen AmhftectutW Group ,® er am oer p ti NDAAYIm Mr m F. on4wm ,V.bw•5 I ROM Cum THAT THS HAM. SPENCU N GN FUM M � er WE OR WU NY OEM SPOhOW AND nuT I w A our EEDM ARLIEIECT GNMA nE LAOS OF THE STATE OF MNNMA. NAM( L WEEK AR FEWPA N NOHR 20506 THE AIDO %KL BE DMIED THE ALMM AND ONNETS OF nEIN NLPECmc 16TRA00 W SMYU AND DIAIL RUM ALL 0== W, smnnDIN NO GDER ROM OM MCUIDO CWYMG M OF nE ATfAOED DGCU NM N0. DESQRfgN DATE CRY 96MfTN 4-" FKBS94AU FKICM SON OTY 4®MRN WNW S M NOELT MMMR: G,43aDCA& GRAN GI: musom CHMKED BY: M HM@NN& QNS GALE 4]Em cowv ER OEELfQA': FOURTH FLOOR PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL N ® A2A4 I I I I I I I I R I I 1 I I R I I I �a Si I I I 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I �1 LEVEL P5 - PARKING RAMP G25 1/16' = 1•_0• I I l0 I I I EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th STREET W. EDINA, MINNESOTA Mn Hanson Archi[eatw Group p 1® hY 00 C r b. TA InCE m qam maw .�e.eR.bsm I Ham CERIFY TINT Tm R^ SPECFERT 1 OR Wa0f WAS PRD* ) BY 19 OR WO W MW SPOA OR. Alm TWAT I AY A OOLY LMM ARCIRIELf WOER THE IAS OF THE SLATE OF MISOM VAN L NNam AN RESM7WN lU M 20506 THE ARMMM SAL BE OEEIm 71E A71MM AND ORIETlS OF DEIR IES(4.'INE 1611RIYB1IS OF MM AND %IALL fETARI ALL COWM LN. SD ARM AND ORER IESElUM RM MUM CWMGTOS OF THE ATTACHED OOME711& 110. OBDWT1011 DATE CITY SIDA9fTAL HT4m FRBAVMU WICNC 5 w CHIP AIRMRAT REVtM 5-1DOR PFn= IRIIUIG 0743000& OR M W. R[/SO/AS OIEC7m W. M HANSEN& OUVER DATE uHDS 0016UBR OIECfORY: 0o A m mffmf On LEVEL P5 PARKING RAMP CITY SUBMITTAL N ® A2.5 i 7 1, Q'\ 3 9 10 0. 11 1. 12 2. T.3 14 15 16 I I A - 6-0' I ri Ed I 15' -0' 1V -0' I I 3W-w - - I, I I I c I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I i 7 1, Q'\ 9 10 0. 11 1. 12 2. '13 14 15 16 JO'-0' 7e'-0' 6-0' 12'-0' Ed 1Y -0' 15' -0' 1V -0' 2S'-0' 3W-w I, I I I c I I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I 7 comr. AND LANDNZ w - - I I I, I - OMM ROCIFI I. I a EDINA CROSSTOWN. MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL .BUILDING -4010 65th STREET W. EDINA,' MINNESOTA Mohagen Hansen Architel roue Group NO) rr. ob O.W O. Td WXQfiAOt Wb lm r. ®.®ua Wp* a I HEEH1' Cm6Y.THAT THIS KAK S14r31G M OR REPORT MS PRO*= B/ ' 1E OR HIDER NY.00EW SIpomm K N® TNT 1 AM A OLLY LIMI'M ARD9W.IROER THE LAWS OF TIC STATE OF WIN ESUIX NARK L HNHT( AN ' REmiwngx MASER: 20506 TIE NROIECT SNLL E OEEiI® THE NIIIOR35 AND OWNERS OF THEW RESFEMIVE 96 MU NM OF SUM AND % LL REIM NL CMI N71 UW..SNNTORY AND ODOR. RESOM R10OS, ICUMM:OWYRGHS OF :,IRE ATTAO® OOETAO:NNTS NO. ESMWTION ORTE OR Al MAL HIRNQURY MKW - slue COY RRAOTTAV REVI90NS SID® RWOELT NIR®ER 0747000Q ONNN OP RN/SCM CHOM) RF. M HANW4M d1VE ONE WW OOIW1nm OREOOIII': Clomp Aftftag m Di.{ LEVEL P6 'PARKING RAMP CITY SUBMITTAL N /12 ee�� .6 HIGHWAY 62 OVERPASS VALLEY NEW ROAD CROSSTOWN HIGHWAY 62 FIRST MINNESOTA BANK REGIONAL SITE SECTION - NORTH/SOUTH 0 RAMP ACCESS CROSSTOWN MONA PATIENT DROP OFF CROSSTOWN PARKING RAMP & MAIN ENTRY MEDICAL SWUNNG REGIONAL SITE SECTION - WEST/EAST FAIRVIEW RAMP ACCESS FAIRVIEW WEST RAMP FRANCE AVENUE SKYWAY TO FAIRVIEW FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th STREET W. EDINA, MINNESOTA Mahagen Hanson A,,Ift.1,W Group mlwoftc e lv Td Immm Sr = ra incwm v*.k 0 = lmowmwy THAT mnw SPEDFKWM OR REPORT US PROYM BY ME OR tMM MY DRECF 9JUMSIOK AND JW I I AM A OMY LOOM ARCWM LIMM TIC LMS OF THE SrATE OF MASM KAJIX L NNSM AR RDMTFWM MA®t 20506 TIC MXW SiALL BE O 113 DE AUTHORS AND ONNOU OF THEIR RE9qLlK 061MJMM OF SWU AND SKL MAIN ALL COMMM IN. SIARRM AND UM RESERn RM OCUOM ODMM OF THE ATTACM DOCASM "m DATE CITY RWARTAL 4-28-M FRaMINARY FRKDC 57Hm Crrf91ffiMAI. R114M 512M PR= NAM 07430DO4 amm W. 16150 at= Ff. M HAtGB*% OUVER DRm. 47908 cmrm amfto mukendw; a" REGIONAL SITE SECTIONS CITY SUBMI-IFTAL. A3.11 Al CROSSTOWN WEST 77=1111al, FAIRVIEW CORNELIA PLACE COMMERCIAL SOUrHDALE POINT OF FRANCE MEDICAL euwmG RALP SOUFHDALE APARTMENTS BUILDINGS MEDICAL BURDING REGIONAL SITE SECTION - NORTH/SOUTH 0 RAMP ACCESS CROSSTOWN MONA PATIENT DROP OFF CROSSTOWN PARKING RAMP & MAIN ENTRY MEDICAL SWUNNG REGIONAL SITE SECTION - WEST/EAST FAIRVIEW RAMP ACCESS FAIRVIEW WEST RAMP FRANCE AVENUE SKYWAY TO FAIRVIEW FAIRVIEW SOUTHDALE EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th STREET W. EDINA, MINNESOTA Mahagen Hanson A,,Ift.1,W Group mlwoftc e lv Td Immm Sr = ra incwm v*.k 0 = lmowmwy THAT mnw SPEDFKWM OR REPORT US PROYM BY ME OR tMM MY DRECF 9JUMSIOK AND JW I I AM A OMY LOOM ARCWM LIMM TIC LMS OF THE SrATE OF MASM KAJIX L NNSM AR RDMTFWM MA®t 20506 TIC MXW SiALL BE O 113 DE AUTHORS AND ONNOU OF THEIR RE9qLlK 061MJMM OF SWU AND SKL MAIN ALL COMMM IN. SIARRM AND UM RESERn RM OCUOM ODMM OF THE ATTACM DOCASM "m DATE CITY RWARTAL 4-28-M FRaMINARY FRKDC 57Hm Crrf91ffiMAI. R114M 512M PR= NAM 07430DO4 amm W. 16150 at= Ff. M HAtGB*% OUVER DRm. 47908 cmrm amfto mukendw; a" REGIONAL SITE SECTIONS CITY SUBMI-IFTAL. A3.11 I � I I BUILDING SECTION - SOUTH BAY \A3., 116- c T._O- I ,4a� I I�w�R�www wRal wwwa M. Rw w w'w w'w'w w Iwwwt- I�'w'w'w'w'w'w'w �'I■II _ IwwwN- I� w �R'w Iw w■wlw1 Ia�w�Ewwwww © BUILDING SECTION L I I I I 1 I COIF ROOF�L 18� I 1 PE11IIgl/9: ROOF EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th STREET W. EDINA, MINNESOTA MHanson Hansen Architectural 0 Group T." ama.ra. n mm m RAY m Yv m4m7m wq n a w 1 ww CE m Dw TIES RIME SFE FWM m ROM WAS PREPARED Of WE OR MICER TAY DIRECT AWERVISIO , lm RAT A T I AY A CLY EEFNSFD ARCHITECT 111W THE LOS OF THE STATE OF M9ESOp ILYN L NNLSK AN REGISTRATION lA16E1t; 20506 THE ARCIETECT %VJL BE OFD® THE A AMM AND OTHERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE F6IINYENI5 OF SUM AND 91NL RETAIN ALL COMMON LO. STATUTORY AND OTHER RESERVED RIGHTS NCIAOm COPYIKHTS OF THE ATTACHE) DOCUIENIS NO. DESCRIPTION DAIS CITY 20MITTAL Wam T4RIAfURY PRICING 5." QTY RMMRAL RLV®ONS imaR N10.QA IRATE 0743MODA. Wal eC lux C ®OD DY: M NANSENIS OUVER aOE 47&W OCMFA OIECI011Y: Clamor MRidL wr m CN BUILDING SECTIONS CITY SUBMIT -17AL. A3.2 SEE U WN,XIW I 161 i WNDOW I 15A WNDPN FE/0 I I 1�0 ,�.Nwm Su� I I 1 WODOW 175 -4 I 6' sm Qmm llff]OINLY BROKER KM WINDOW Smu W/ 1' O8IRATINO I O p-% TYP. WODOW 119 -4 ",'"0' 9 FAST 1 -0 878 . -�795— I I PARTIAL ELEVATION - BUILDING z WALL SECTION 3 WALL SECTION a PARTIAL ELEVATION - RAMP �� WALL SECTION t-e1 WALL SECTION Ai3 1 /1' = 1' -0' 1/1' = 1' -0' 1/4' = 1' -O' 1/4' = 1' -0' 1/4' = 1' -0' A 1 /4' = V -O' EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th STREET W. EDINA, MINNESOTA Mn Hanson Architec oup Group 1® nr. Rs 1NAr a. T. 9MCW m 96 10 F. InCW W yes r � .rmey.rs® 1 HUM CE71M THAT T16 FLAK SPECMTM OR ROW WAS PEIVM BY WE OR LIDER MY DOW SLFERRY®4 AND MAT I WM AN A OLLY L ARCMM R1DFR RE LAYS OF THE SATE OF NNNESONA WAKK L IIA7SEN. AA IEGUMDON NUMBER 2DM6 THE NSIORCT %W BE DFT]® THE NAHM AND OWNERS OF DM RESPO ME 16TROVENR OF SERYM AND SHALL RETAN ALL COCOON RAW, SrATLRORY AND OMEN RESERVED RENTS, NCLLDINO WPOECHIS OF THE ATTACHED OODAdX S NO. D6CRPMON DATE MY SNMRAL 42008 NtB9AYAAY Mac 1.12 -M 011' ANMRAL tEVISM SIDOB PFAW NLIM 0743000E ORM OF CIELI® 81*. M NANSM O1VER DOE: 17800 OOIPNER ORELTDO': Oum O MdONYSldM O.W CITY SUBMITTAL A3.3 ji yl J � y � UZI! Rendering of South Elevation Mohagen NAME Hansen Archiieciural Group Y Crosstown Medical Office Buidling Edina, Minnesota Preliminary Development Application Revised May 20th, 2008 Birds -Eye View from South Birds -Eye View from Northwest Mohagen Hansen Architectural Group Birds -Eye View from North View from Southeast Crosstown Medical Office Building Edina, Minnesota Preliminary Development Application Revised May 20th, 2008 5, C , 1 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Wayne Houle, PE aAA- City Engineer Date: June 3, 2008 Subject: Approve resolution and set Public Hearing Date for Woodland Circle/Woodland Lane, Improvement BA -345; and Woodend Drive, Improvement BA -352 Recommendation: Agenda Item # V. E. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Approve attached resolution calling for public hearing on July 1, 2008, for roadway improvements for Woodland Circle and Woodland Lane, Improvement BA -345 and Woodend Drive, Improvement BA -352. Info /Background: Staff is requesting public hearings for these two projects. Woodland Circle and Woodland Lane are located on the north side of Minnehaha Creek and Woodend Drive is located on the south side of Minnehaha Creek. The two projects are linked by a common watermain installation. Both projects are staff initiated and will be funded through special assessments based on Chapter 429 of the State Statute and appropriate city utility funds. A neighborhood informational meeting was held on May 22, 2008, for both projects. Feasibility studies will be completed and submitted to the City Council prior to the public hearings. Staff suggests scheduling the public hearings for July 1, 2008. G :\Engineering\lmprovements\BA345 Woodland Ln_Cir\ADMRV\MISC\20080603 RR request public hearing BA345.doc RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -52 CALLING PUBLIC HEARING FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS BA -345 & BA -352 WOODLAND CIRCLE AND WOODLAND LANE AND WOODEND DRIVE AREA SEWER, WATER AND STREET RECONSTRUCTION City of Edina WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve roadways and utilities on the streets of Woodland Circle, Woodland Lane and Woodend Drive. BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Edina shall hold public hearings on July 1, 2008, at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chamber of Edina City, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN to consider the making of: - • Improvement Nos. BA -345, SS -440, STS -346 and WM-466 for the streets of Woodland Circle and Woodland Lane. • Improvement Nos. BA -352, SS -442, STS -349 and WM-484 for the street of Woodend Drive. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law. Dated: June 3, 2008 Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk .STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 3, 2008, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk City Hall 952 - 927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 -0379 To: Mayor & City Council From: Wayne D. Houle, PE City Engineer Date: June 3, 2008 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION Subject: Change Order for Well No. 3 Well Renovation Improvement No. WM -470, Contract No. PW 07 -5 Recommendation: Agenda Item # V. F. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Authorize Change Order for change of method to rehabilitated Well No. 3, located at 5233 Halifax Avenue. Info /Background: The original project included renovating.Well No. 3 by redeveloping the bottom of the well. During construction the Contractor discovered an issue with the casing pipe of the well. This issue was corrected and the contractor proceeded to redevelop the well bottom. The Contractor discovered that the original well cavity is adequate for the anticipated pumping capacity of the well. The change order is generated from the additional work to correct the casing pipe and the deletion of the work on the bottom of the well. The proposed change order will increase the contract amount more than ten percent, therefore requiring City Council to approve this change order. The total increase of this change order is $8,530.00. The original contract amount for the project is $58,245.00. The project is funded through the Capital Improvement Program and is still within the budget allowed. Staff recommends approving this change order. GAEngineering \Contract Numbers\2007\PW 07 -5 Well No. 3, 5233 HalifaAADMIN\MISC\2008 rr Change Order 1 PW 07 -5.doc r® To: Mayor & City Council From: Joyce Repya Associate Planner Date: June 3, 2008 Subject: Urban Hennepin County Joint Cooperation Agreement Years 2009 -2011 Recommendation: REPORT/RECOMMENDATION Agenda Item.V.G. Consent X Information Only Mgr. Recommends To HRA To Council Action Motion Resolution Ordinance Discussion Authorize execution of Years 2009 - 2011 Joint Cooperation Agreement by Mayor and City Manager Information/Background: Attached is a new three -year agreement between the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), Hennepin County and the City of Edina governing the receipt and expenditure of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for fiscal 2009 - 2011. The agreement sets forth broad shared powers for carrying out housing and community development activities. HUD requires this agreement in order for Hennepin County to qualify as an urban county and receive CDBG Program entitlement funds. The existing Joint Cooperation Agreement (FY 2006 - 2008) will expire on September 30, 2008. There are no modifications being proposed to the existing agreement with the exception of clarifying the. automatic renewal clause in Section III of the proposed agreement (i.e., at the end of the next renewal period, on September 30, 2011, the County will notify the participating cities of their right to no longer participate in the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program as stipulated in the agreement; if the cities continue their participation, the agreement will automatically be renewed for another three -year term.) RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -53 AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF EDINA AND HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR PARTICIPATION IN THE URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM IN FY 2009 — 2011 WHEREAS, the City of Edina Minnesota and the County of Hennepin have in effect a Joint Cooperation Agreement for purposes of qualifying as an Urban County under the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Development. Block Grant (CDBG) and HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME) Programs; and WHEREAS, the City and County wish to execute a new Joint Cooperation Agreement in order to continue to qualify as an Urban County for purposes of the Community Development Block Grant and HOME Programs. BE IT THEREFORE RESOLVED that a new Joint Cooperation Agreement between the City and County be executed effective October 1, 2008 and that the Mayor and the City Manager be authorized and directed to sign the Agreement on behalf of the City. Passed and adopted this 3`d day of June, 2008. Attest: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of June 3, 2008 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20 City Clerk Contract No. A080541 JOINT COOPERATION AGREEMENT URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into by and between the COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY," A -2400 Government Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55487, and the cities executing this Master Agreement, each hereinafter respectively referred to as "COOPERATING UNIT," said parties to this Agreement each being governmental units of the State of Minnesota, and made pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.59: WITNESSETH: COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY agree that it is desirable and in the interests of their citizens that COOPERATING UNIT shares its authority to carry out essential community development and housing activities with COUNTY in order to permit COUNTY to secure and administer Community Development Block Grant and HOME Investment Partnership funds as an Urban County within the provisions of the Act as herein defined and, therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises contained in this Agreement, the parties mutually agree to the following terms and conditions. COOPERATING UNIT acknowledges that by the execution of this Agreement that it understands that it: May not also apply for grants under the State CDBG Program from appropriations for fiscal years during which it is participating in the Urban County Program; and 2. May not participate in a HOME Consortium except through the Urban County. I. DEFINITIONS The definitions contained in 42 USC 5302 of the Act and 24 CFR §570.3 of the Regulations are incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof, and the terms defined in this section have the meanings given them: A. "Act" means Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, (42 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.). B. "Activity" means a CDBG - funded activity eligible under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended. Example: single family rehab activity. C. "Annual Program" means those combined activities submitted by cooperating units to COUNTY for CDBG funding as part of the Consolidated Plan. D. "Consolidated Plan" means the document bearing that title or similarly required statements or documents submitted to HUD for authorization to expend the annual grant amount and which is developed by the COUNTY in conjunction with COOPERATING UNITS as part of the Community Development Block Grant Program. E. "Cooperating Unit(s)" means any city or town in Hennepin County that has entered into a cooperation agreement that is identical to this Agreement, as well as Hennepin County, which is a party to each Agreement. ' F. "HUD" means the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. G. "Metropolitan City" means any city located in whole or in part in Hennepin County which is certified by HUD to have a population of 50,000 or more people. H. "Program" means the HUD Community Development Block Grant Program as defined under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended. I. "Program Income" means gross income received by the recipient or a subrecipient directly generated from the use of CDBG. J. "Regulations" means the rules and regulations promulgated pursuant to the Act, including but not limited to 24 CFR Part 570. K. "Urban County" means the entitlement jurisdiction within the provisions of the Act and includes the suburban Hennepin County municipalities which are signatories to this Agreement. II. PURPOSE The purpose of this Agreement is to authorize COUNTY and COOPERATING UNIT to cooperate to undertake, or assist in undertaking, community renewal and lower income housing assistance activities and authorizes COUNTY to carry out these and other eligible activities for the benefit of eligible recipients who reside within the corporate limits of the COOPERATING UNIT which will be funded from annual Community Development Block Grant and HOME appropriations for the Federal Fiscal Years 2009, 2010 and 2011 and from any program income generated from the expenditure of such funds. III. AGREEMENT The initial term of this Agreement is for a period commencing on October 1, 2008 and terminating no sooner than the end of the program year covered by the Consolidated Plan for the basic grant amount for the Fiscal Year 2011, as authorized by HUD, and for such additional time as may be required for the expenditure of funds granted to the County for such period. Prior to the end of the initial term and the end of each subsequent qualification period, the COUNTY, as the lead agency of the URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM, shall provide a written notice to the COOPERATING UNIT of their right not to participate in a subsequent qualification period. The written notice will provide the COOPERATING UNIT a minimum thirty (30) day period to submit a written withdrawal. If the COOPERATING UNIT does not submit to the COUNTY a written withdrawal during the notice period, this Agreement shall be automatically extended for a subsequent three - year qualifying period. This Agreement must be amended by written agreement of all parties to incorporate any future changes necessary to meet the requirements for cooperation agreements set forth in the Urban County Qualification Notice applicable for the year in which the next qualification of the County is scheduled. Failure by either party to adopt such an amendment to the Agreement shall automatically terminate the Agreement following the expenditure of all CDBG and HOME funds allocated for use in the COOPERATING UNIT's jurisdiction. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, this Agreement may be terminated at the end of the program period during which HUD withdraws its designation of the COUNTY as an Urban County under the Act. This Agreement shall be executed by the appropriate officers of COOPERATING. UNIT and COUNTY pursuant to authority granted them by their respective governing bodies, and a copy of the authorizing resolution and executed Agreement shall be filed promptly by the COOPERATING UNIT in the Hennepin County Department of Housing, Community Works and Transit, and in no event shall the Agreement be filed later than June 30, 2008. COOPERATING UNIT and COUNTY shall take all actions necessary to assure compliance with the applicant's certifications required by Section 104(b) of the Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, including Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; the Fair Housing Act, Section 109 of Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974; and other applicable laws. IV. ACTIVITIES COOPERATING UNIT agrees that awarded grant funds will be used to undertake and carry out, within the terms of this Agreement, certain activities eligible for funding under the Act. The COUNTY agrees and will assist COOPERATING UNIT in the undertaking of such essential activities by providing the services specified in this Agreement. The parties mutually agree to comply with all applicable requirements of the Act and the Regulations and other relevant Federal and/or Minnesota statutes or regulations in the use of basic grant amounts. Nothing in this Article shall be construed to lessen or abrogate the COUNTY's responsibility to assume all obligations of an applicant under the Act, including the development of the Consolidated Plan, pursuant to 24 CFR Part 91. COOPERATING UNIT further specifically agrees as follows: A. COOPERATING UNIT will, in accord with a COUNTY- established schedule, prepare and provide to the COUNTY, in a prescribed form; requests for the use of Community Development Block Grant Funds consistent with this Agreement, program regulations and the Urban Hennepin County Consolidated Plan. B. COOPERATING UNIT acknowledges that, pursuant to 24 CFR §570.501 (b), it is subject to the same requirements applicable to subrecipients, including the requirement for a written Subrecipient Agreement set forth in 24 CFR §570.503. The Subrecipient Agreement will cover the implementation requirements for each activity funded pursuant to this Agreement and shall be duly executed with and in a form prescribed by the COUNTY. C. COOPERATING UNIT acknowledges that it is subject to the same subrecipient requirements stated in paragraph B above in instances where an agency other than itself is undertaking an activity pursuant to this Agreement on behalf of COOPERATING UNIT. In such instances, a written Third Party Agreement shall be duly executed between the agency and COOPERATING UNIT in a form prescribed by COUNTY. D. COOPERATING UNITS shall expend all funds annually allocated to activities pursuant to this Agreement within eighteen (18) months of the authorization by HUD to expend the basic grant amount. With each annual program COOPERATING UNITS shall submit to the COUNTY activity schedules for the completion and expenditure of funds within eighteen (18) months. COUNTY will institute monitoring measures and provide technical or other assistance to insure activities are proceeding on schedule. 2. Funds for activities not expended within eighteen (18) months may be recaptured at the discretion of the COUNTY and distributed by COUNTY as provided for in D. 4. Limited extensions to the expenditure deadlines in this section may be granted by COUNTY upon written request only where the authorized activity has been initiated and/or is subject to a binding contract which provides for the expenditure to be completed within a time period acceptable to COUNTY. Amendments to an annual program by COOPERATING UNITS may be approved by COUNTY up to fifteen (15) months after initial funding has been approved only when the new activity can be completed and funding expended within six (6) months of the amendment approval. Funds not expended within the six (6) month extension period may be recaptured and distributed by COUNTY as provided for in DA. 4. All funds recaptured by COUNTY will be transferred to a separate account for reallocation on a competitive request for proposal basis at the discretion of the COUNTY where total of such funds is $100,000 or greater. Amounts less than $100,000 shall be allocated by COUNTY to other existing activities consistent with timeliness requirements and Consolidated Plan goals. E. COUNTY and COOPERATING UNITS shall expend all program income pursuant to this Agreement as provided below: Program income from housing rehabilitation activities administered by the COUNTY will be incorporated into a pool at the discretion of the COUNTY. The pool will be administered by COUNTY and will be used for housing rehabilitation projects located throughout the entire Urban County. When possible, COUNTY will give priority to funding housing rehabilitation projects within the COOPERATING UNIT where the program income was generated. Funds expended in this manner would be secured by a Repayment Agreement/Mortgage running in favor of the COUNTY. Program income generated by certain COOPERATING UNITS that administer their own housing rehabilitation activities may be retained by the COOPERATING UNIT at its discretion; however, such COOPERATING UNITS will be bound by the conditions of D.2., above. Only COOPERATING UNITS that were administering their own activities pursuant to the Joint Cooperation Agreement pertaining to the HUD fiscal years 2006 -2008 will be eligible to retain their program income. 2. COUNTY reserves the option to recapture program income generated by non - housing rehabilitation activities if said funds have not been expended within twelve (12) months of being generated. These funds shall be transferred to a separate account for reallocation on a competitive request for proposal basis administered by COUNTY or, where the total of such funds does not exceed $100,000, shall be reallocated by COUNTY to other existing activities consistent with timeliness requirements and Consolidated Plan goals. F. COOPERATING UNITS are encouraged to undertake joint activities involving the sharing of funding when such action furthers the goals of the Consolidated Plan and meets the expenditure goals. G. If COUNTY is notified by HUD that it has not met the performance standard for the timely expenditure of funds at 24 CFR 570.902(a) and the COUNTY entitlement grant is reduced by HUD according to its policy on corrective actions, then the basic grant amount to any COOPERATING UNIT that has not met its expenditure goal shall be reduced accordingly. H. COOPERATING UNIT will take actions necessary to assist in accomplishing the community development program and housing goals, as contained in the Urban Hennepin County Consolidated Plan. I. COOPERATING UNIT shall ensure that all activities funded, in part or in full by grant funds received pursuant to this Agreement, shall be undertaken affirmatively with regard to fair housing, employment and business opportunities for minorities and women. It shall, in implementing all programs and/or activities funded by the basic grant amount, comply with all applicable Federal and Minnesota Laws, statutes, rules and regulations with regard to civil rights, affirmative action and equal employment opportunities and Administrative Rule issued by the COUNTY. J. COOPERATING UNIT that does not affirmatively further fair housing within its own jurisdiction or that impedes action by COUNTY to comply with its fair housing certification shall be prohibited from receiving CDBG funding for any activities. K. COOPERATING UNIT shall participate in the citizen participation process, as established by COUNTY, in compliance with the requirements of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended. L. COOPERATING UNIT shall reimburse COUNTY for any expenditure determined by HUD or COUNTY to be ineligible. M. COOPERATING UNIT shall prepare, execute, and cause to be filed all documents protecting the interests of the parties hereto or any other party of interest as may be designated by the COUNTY. N. COOPERATING UNIT has adopted and is enforcing: 1. A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in nonviolent civil rights demonstrations; and 2. A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such nonviolent civil rights demonstrations within its jurisdiction. COUNTY further specifically agrees as follows: A. COUNTY shall prepare and submit to HUD and appropriate reviewing agencies, on an annual basis, all plans, statements and program documents necessary for receipt of a basic grant amount under the Act. B. COUNTY shall provide, to the maximum extent feasible, technical assistance and coordinating services to COOPERATING UNIT in the preparation and submission of a request for funding. C. COUNTY shall provide ongoing technical assistance to COOPERATING UNIT to aid COUNTY in fulfilling its responsibility to HUD for accomplishment of the community development program and housing goals. D. COUNTY shall, upon official request by COOPERATING UNIT, agree to administer local housing rehabilitation activities funded pursuant to the Agreement, provided that COUNTY shall receive Twelve percent (12 %) of the allocation by COOPERATING UNIT to the activity as reimbursement for costs associated with the administration of COOPERATING UNIT activity. E. COUNTY may, at its discretion and upon official request by COOPERATING UNIT, agree to administer, for a possible fee, other activities funded pursuant to this Agreement on behalf of COOPERATING UNIT. F. COUNTY may, as necessary for clarification and coordination of program administration, develop and implement Administrative Rules consistent with the Act, Regulations, HUD administrative directives, and administrative requirements of COUNTY. V. ALLOCATION OF BASIC GRANT AMOUNTS Basic grant amounts received by the COUNTY under Section 106 of the Act shall be allocated as follows: A. COUNTY shall retain Thirteen percent (13 %) of the annual basic grant amount for the administration of the program. Included in this administrative amount is funding for annual county -wide Fair Housing activities. B. The balance of the basic grant amount shall be made available by COUNTY to COOPERATING UNITS in accordance with the formula stated in part C and the procedure stated in part D of this section utilizing data provided by HUD. The allocation is for planning purposes only and is not a guarantee of funding. C. Allocation of funding will be based upon a formula using data supplied by HUD that bears the same ratio to the balance of the basic grant amount as the average of the ratios between: The population of COOPERATING UNIT and the population of all COOPERATING UNITS. 2. The extent of poverty in COOPERATING UNIT and the extent of poverty in all COOPERATING UNITS. 3. The extent of overcrowded housing by units in COOPERATING UNIT and the extent of overcrowded housing by units in all COOPERATING UNITS. 4. In determining the average of the above ratios, the ratio involving the extent of poverty shall be counted twice. D. Funds will be made available to communities utilizing the formula specified in C of this Section in the following manner: All COOPERATING UNITS with aggregate formula percentages of greater than three and one half percent (3.5 %) of the total using the procedure in part C. of this section will receive funding allocations in accordance with the COUNTY formula allocations. COOPERATING UNITS with aggregate formula percentages of three and one half percent (3.5 %) or less of the total using the procedure in part C. of this section will have their funds consolidated into a pool for award in a manner determined by COUNTY on a competitive request for proposal basis. Only the COUNTY and COOPERATING UNITS whose funding has been pooled will be eligible to compete for these funds. E. The COUNTY shall develop these ratios based upon data to be furnished by HUD. The COUNTY assumes no duty to gather such data independently and assumes no liability for any errors in the data furnished by HUD. F. In the event COOPERATING UNIT does not request a funding allocation, or a portion thereof, the amount not requested shall be made available to other participating communities, in a manner determined by COUNTY. 6 VI. METROPOLITAN CITIES Any metropolitan city executing this Agreement shall defer their entitlement status and become part of Urban Hennepin County. This agreement can be voided if the COOPERATING UNIT is advised by HUD, prior to the completion of the re- qualification process for fiscal years 2009 -2011, that it is eligible to become a metropolitan city and the COOPERATING UNIT elects to take its entitlement status. If the agreement is not voided on the basis of the COOPERATING UNIT's eligibility as a metropolitan city prior to July 8, 2008, the COOPERATING UNIT must remain a part of the COUNTY program for the entire three -year period of the COUNTY qualification. VII. OPINION OF COUNSEL The undersigned, on behalf of the Hennepin County Attorney, having reviewed this Agreement, hereby opines that the terms and provisions of the Agreement are fully authorized under State and local law and that the COOPERATING UNIT has full legal authority to undertake or assist in undertaking essential community development and housing assistance activities, specifically urban renewal and publicly - assisted housing. Assistant County Attorney VIII. HENNEPIN COUNTY EXECUTION The Hennepin County Board of Commissioners having duly approved this Agreement on May 6, 2008, and pursuant to such approval and the proper County official having signed this Agreement, the COUNTY agrees to be bound by the provisions herein set forth. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN, STATE OF MINNESOTA RV. - I Chair of its County Board e „A Assistant/Deputy /County Administrator Attest: Deputy /Clerk of the County Board RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL Assistant County Administrator - Public Works APPROVED AS TO FORM: Date: Assistant County Attorney Department, Housing, Community Works and Transit Date: Date: APPROVED AS TO EXECUTION: Assistant County Attorney Date: IX. COOPERATING UNIT EXECUTION COOPERATING UNIT, having signed this Agreement, and the COOPERATING LTNIT'S governing body having duly approved this Agreement on , 2008, and pursuant to such approval and the proper city official having signed this Agreement, COOPERATING UNIT agrees to be bound by the provisions of this Joint Cooperation Agreement, contract A080541. CITY OF EDINA By: Its Mayor And: Its City Manager ATTEST: CITY MUST CHECK ONE: The City is organized pursuant to: Plan A Plan B Charter May 13, 2008 R59CKREL -jG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 309423 5/22/2008 100613 AAA 15.50 NEW PLATE & TABS 15.50 309424 5/22/2008 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 29.56 067104 65.64 24.04 23.08 73.16 5/22/2008 CITY INA Council Check Register 5/22/2008 -- 5122/2008 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 185828 051408 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS 185897 0610482 185898 0610481 185899 0610487 186086 0720382 186087 0610483 186088 0610488 186089 0720383 309425 5/22/2008 100615 ACME WINDOW CLEANING INC 1,112.93 WINDOW CLEANING 00001082 185719 067104 1,112.93 309426 5/22/2008 102128 AEARO CO. 76.00 SAFETY GLASSES 00005516 185720 03709643 26.00 SAFETY GLASSES 00005516 185721 03709641 102.00 309427 5/22/2008 111228 ALDEN POOL & MUNICIPAL SUPPLY 1,902.09 VACUUM REGULATORS 00001002 185722 800252 1,902.09 309428 5/22/2008 101479 AMERICAN SERVICE CORP. 174.85 BAILER MAINTENANCE 185829 7143 74.50 TWINE 185986 7133 158.19 MACHINE MAINTENANCE 185987 7145 233.37 MACHINE MAINTENANCE, TWINE 186028 7144 640.91 309429 5/22/2008 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 560.95 FOOD 186029 955236 560.95 309430 5/22/2008 100642 BANNERS TO GO 21.30 PARK SIGN 00005835 185723, 26175 21.30 5822.5515 5842.5515 5842.5515 5842.5515 5862.5515 5862.5515 5862.5515 1375.6103 1301.6610 1301.6610 5911.6530 5821.6215 5861.6406 5861.6215 5841.6215 5421.5510 1647.6406 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SAFETY EQUIPMENT SAFETY EQUIPMENT REPAIR PARTS J8 8:11:22 Page - 1 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING PARKING RAMP GENERAL MAINTENANCE GENERAL MAINTENANCE PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY GENERALSUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE VERNON OCCUPANCY EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE YORK OCCUPANCY COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL PATHS & HARD SURFACE R55CKREG LOG20000 119679 BIXBY PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CITY OF EDINA- 9491 73.45 TOILET SERVICE 186030 9571 Council Check Register TOILET SERVICE 186031 9570 124.18 TOILET SERVICE 186032 5122/2008 --5/22/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 309431 5/2212008 292885 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING PAPER SUPPLIES 309.70 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 185900 44662400 5862.5512 108.70 185901 44662700 5862.5513 387.75 185902 44663000 5822.5513 25.00 185903 80780600 5822.5515 53.86 185903 80780600 5822.6406 142.11 185904 80780700 5842.5515 185.82 185905 80723900 5842.5515 59.40- 185906 80755100 5842.5515 12.10 185907 80749400 5842.6406 244.67 185907 80749400 5842.5515 263.85 186090 44727500 5862.5512 289.75 186091 44744500 5822.5513 268.05 186092 44603700 5842.5513 815.83 186093 44662800 5842.5513 26.00 186094 80780500 5862.6512 82.66 186094 80780500 5862.5515 101.46 186095 80801900 5822.5515 3,257.91 309432 5/22/2008 101191 BENNEROTTE, JENNIFER 77.34 AD STYLEBOOKS 185724 031308 2210.6406 77.34 309433 5/22/2008 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 142.85 OFFICE SUPPLIES 185725 OE- 157691 -1 1260.6406 46.22 OFFICE SUPPLIES 186198 0E- 154502 -1 1550.6406 189.07 309434 5/22/2008 117013 BILL'S HOME REPAIR & REMODELIN 23,260.00 HOME REPAIRS 185988 051208 2127.6103 23, 260.00 309435 5/22/2008 309436 5/22/2008 1642.6103 5430.6182 5422.6182 5422.6182 47050.6710 5/21/2008 8:11:22 Page - 2 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 119679 BIXBY PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 140.65 TOILET SERVICE 00005977 185830 9491 73.45 TOILET SERVICE 186030 9571 124.18 TOILET SERVICE 186031 9570 124.18 TOILET SERVICE 186032 9569 462.46 . GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 331.00 INSPECTION AT COURTNEY FIELDS)0005976 185726 292885 1642.6103 5430.6182 5422.6182 5422.6182 47050.6710 5/21/2008 8:11:22 Page - 2 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMM DEV BLK GRANT PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE RUBBISH REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT COURTNEY PARK' -'NT GARAGE r r R55CKREV _JG20000 185908 304874 5822.5515 CITY INA 757.45 185909 304877 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING Council Check Register 185910 304873 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 88.80 5/22/2008 -5/22/2008 5842.5515 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 2,339.65 331.00 309444 5/22/2008 115537 CARPETS PLUS COLORTILE 309437 5/22/2008 122496 BREAKTIME BEVERAGE INC. 23.55 BUILDING MATERIALS 00005827 185729 84039 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 93.14 CANDY 00006348 186033 2340:014354 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 309445 5/22/2008 102064 CASH REGISTER SALES & SERVICE 93.14 204.00 PROGRAM REGISTERS 185831 309438 5122/2008 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 100669 BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC. 204.00 471.60 AGLIME 00005641 185727 28610 1642.6542 INFIELD MIXTURE 471.60 309439 5/22/2008 103995 BRYAN, LINDA NELSON 52.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 185972 051208 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 52.00 309440 5/2212008 117405 BUNKERT, DENISE 120.25 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 185971 051208 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 120.25 309441 5/22/2008 122533 C & L EXCAVATING INC. 4,550.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 00005681 185728 8501 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 4,550.00 309442 5/22/2008 120935 CAMPBELL KNUTSON J8 8:11:22 Page - 3 Business Unit GRILL FIELD MAINTENANCE ART CENTER REVENUES ART CENTER REVENUES DISTRIBUTION 5 713.06 LEGAL 185989 2851G-4108 1195.6131 PROFESSIONAL SERV - LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES 5,713.06 309443 5122/2008 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 14.65 185908 304874 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 757.45 185909 304877 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,387.25 185910 304873 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 88.80 185911 304872 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 91.50 186034 10992 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 2,339.65 309444 5/22/2008 115537 CARPETS PLUS COLORTILE 23.55 BUILDING MATERIALS 00005827 185729 84039 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 23.55 309445 5/22/2008 102064 CASH REGISTER SALES & SERVICE 204.00 PROGRAM REGISTERS 185831 051208 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL ADMINISTRATION 204.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/22/2008 --5/22/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 309446 5/22/2008 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 110.00 185912 78911 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 110.00 309447 5/2212008 100681 CATCO 833.17 KITS, MULTIFASTERS 00005904 185730 3 -50238 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 833.17 309448 5/22/2008 102372 CDW GOVERNMENT INC. 336.53 TONER 186035 GTV1510 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 336.53 309449 5/22/2008 100897 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 26.54 186171 050108 5821.6186 HEAT 117.64 186171 050108 5841.6186 HEAT 216.91 186171 050108 5430.6186 HEAT 372.10 186171 050108 5422.6186 HEAT 414.01 186171 050108 5861.6186 HEAT 498.24 186171 050108 1481.6186 HEAT 1,198.19 186171 050108 5111.6186 HEAT 1,225.76 186171 050108 5630.6186 HEAT 1,350.10 186171 050108 5420.6186 HEAT 1,585.74 186171 050108 1552.6186 HEAT 1,688.13 186171 050108 5911.6186 HEAT 1,950.73 186171 050108 1628.6186 HEAT 3,980.26 186171 050108 5913.6186 HEAT 5,013.95 186171 050108 1646.6186 HEAT 15,318.07 186171 050108 5511.6186 HEAT 15,724.12 186171 050108 5210.6186 HEAT 50,680.49 309450 5/22/2008 103711 CENTERPOINT ENERGY SERVICES IN 7,249.56 185990 1623102 1552.6186 HEAT 37.28 185991 1623112 5311.6186 HEAT 4,390.10 185992 1623082 5620.6186 HEAT 11,676.94 309451 5/22/2008 116353 CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS INC. 431.11 ENVELOPES 185993 20110 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 431.11 309452 i a 5/2212008 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 5/2112008 8:11:22 Page- 4 Business Unit 50TH ST SELLING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY RICHARDS GOLF COURSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK FIRE STATION ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT CENTENNIAL LAKES CLUB HOUSE CENT SVC PW BUILDING PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER SENIOR CITIZENS DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GOLF DOME PROGRAM CENT SVC PW BUILDING POOL OPERATION EDINBOROUGH PARK CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R59CKREL JG20000 Check # Date' Amount Supplier / Explanation PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 559.01 185731 050908 247.85 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HEALTH ALERT NETWORK 806.86 050908 309453 5/22/2008 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 100684 CITY OF BLOOMINGTON 185832 1,766.00 ACTIVITY 223- 6226- 345 -47 -23 SEWER & WATER 2,984.25 ACTIVITY 223- 6226- 345A7 -23 0200650027 -4/08 7,759.25 ACTIVITY 223 - 6226- 345A7 -23 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 12,509.50 0203600013 -4108 309454 5/22/2008 SEWER & WATER 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 185835 100.38 00077442- 0203158000 SEWER & WATER 85.92 00077442 - 0200650027 02008620034/08 221.31 00101025- 0203600013 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1.27 00101025- 0203610011 1552.6189 71.45 00077443 - 0200862003 185838 670.32 00077443 - 0203158108 SEWER & WATER 61.95 00077443 - 0203163003 02006500094/08 655.64 00082050- 0200650009 CITY HALL GENERAL 64.60 00082198 - 0200815001 1375.6189 17.95 00102561- 0203163012 185841 35.40 00104391 - 0200650018 SEWER & WATER 17.95 00103426- 0203502012 0200650018 -4/08 1,044.39 00103426 - 0203502003 CITY HALL GENERAL 3,048.53 0203502012 -4/08 309455 5/22/2008 SEWER & WATER 105246 CITY OF PLYMOUTH 185844 20.00 SAFETY SYMPOSIUM SEWER & WATER 20.00 309456 5/2212008 101850 CITY. OF ST. PAUL 662.48 ASPHALT 662.48 309457 5/22/2008 105693 CITYSPRINT 22.23 COURIER 161.60 COURIER 183.83 309458 5/2212008 101936 CLARK PRODUCTS INC. 175.44 CONCESSION PRODUCT 175.44 CITY Council 5/22/2008 PO # Doc No Inv No 185913 364383 185914 363139 INA :heck Register -5/2212008 Account No Subledger• Account Description 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER J8 8:11:22 Page - 5 Business Unit YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 185731 050908 4205.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PANDEMIC FLU GRANT 185731 050908 4204.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HEALTH ALERT NETWORK 185731 050908 4204.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HEALTH ALERT NETWORK 185832 02031580004/08 1552.6189 SEWER & WATER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 185833 0200650027 -4/08 1646.6189 SEWER & WATER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 185834 0203600013 -4108 1628.6189 SEWER & WATER SENIOR CITIZENS 185835 02036100114/08 1628.6189 SEWER & WATER SENIOR CITIZENS 185836 02008620034/08 5821.6189 SEWER & WATER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 185837 02031581084/08 1552.6189 SEWER & WATER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 185838 0203163003 -4/08 5861.6189 SEWER & WATER VERNON OCCUPANCY 185839 02006500094/08 1551.6189 SEWER & WATER CITY HALL GENERAL 185840 02008150014/08 1375.6189 SEWER & WATER PARKING RAMP 185841 02031630124/08 5861.6189 SEWER & WATER VERNON OCCUPANCY 185842 0200650018 -4/08 1551.6189 SEWER & WATER CITY HALL GENERAL 185843 0203502012 -4/08 1552.6189 SEWER & WATER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 185844 02035020034/08 1552.6189 SEWER & WATER CENT SVC PW BUILDING 186172 1200801383 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 00001156 185994 104396 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 185995 10745 01213.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO 185995 10745 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 185996 V616453 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/21/2008 8:11:22 Council Check Register Page - 6 5/22/2008 -5/22/2008 Check # Data Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 309459 5/22/2008 122552 CRUM, SPENCER 7,825.00 PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT 185997 051408 05466.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN WM -466 WOODLAND LN TO WOODEND 7,825.00 309460 5/2212008 103176 DANICIC, JOHN 56.55 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 185973 051208 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 56.55 309461 5122/2008 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 3,903.40 185915 456913 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 732.80 185916 456912 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 107.00 185917 456868 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 15.95 186096 456911 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 878.89 186097 456910 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,638.04 309462 5/22/2008 118189 DEM -CON LANDFILL LLC 47.40 LANDFILL TIMBERS 00006187 186195 139158 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 47.40 309463 5127/2008 122135 DENFELD, SCOTT 174.24 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 185732 051308 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 174.24 309464 5122/2008 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 59.78 BAKERY 186036 271952 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 82.23 BAKERY 186037 273547 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 85.07 BAKERY 186038 273618 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 62.46 BAKERY 186039 273601 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 139.29 BAKERY 186040 273752 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 52.52 BAKERY 186041 273844 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 481.35 309465 5/22/2008 102831 DEX EAST 17.00 186200 315411334 5110.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 17.00 309466 512212008 121103 DIRECTV 81.98 SERVICE 186173 778834087 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 81.98 R56CKRE. jG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 309467 5/22/2008 108648 DOAN, SIIRI 106.60 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 106.60 309468 5122/2008 100739 EAGLE WINE 427.84 34.65 CITY MINA Council Check Register 5/22/2008 -- 5/22/2008 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 185974 051208 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 185918 52550 185919 52554 185920 52553 185921 52558 309469 5/22/2008 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 119716 EASTERN PACIFIC APPAREL INC. 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 38.89 MERCHANDISE 00006355 186042 393820 50TH ST SELLING 38.89 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 309470 5/22/2008 102955 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 152.93 MN STATE CAPITOL - APR 20 185845 08 -040 152.93 309471 5/22/2008 102340 EDMUNDS, LIZ 57.45 185922 912 57.45 309472 5/22/2008 101476 EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES 589.90 EASEMENT ACQUISITION 185733 00 -8615 85.00 PROJECT MGR - ACQUISITION 185734 00 -8614 674.90 309473 5/2212008 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 452.67 BRAKE PADS, ROTORS 00001041 185735 6- 1038746 290.76 PIT ARMS 00005702 186201 6- 1027525 142.37 JOINT KITS 00005382 186202 6- 1027469 885.80 309474 5122/2008 122549 FARNER - BOCKEN COMPANY 237.55 FOOD 00006337 185846 5324096 564.26 FOOD 00006337 185847 5284109 13.80 FOOD 00006337 185848 5301332 815.61 309475 5/2212008 119971 FELSEN, GREGG 79.30 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 185975 051208 08 8:11:22 Page - 7 Business Unit ART CENTER REVENUES 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1629.6406 5822.5515 05466.1705.20 05472.1705.20 1553.6530 1553.6530 1553.6530 5430.5510 5430.5510 5430.5510 5101.4413 GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD ART WORK SOLD ADAPTIVE RECREATION 50TH ST SELLING WMA66 WOODLAND LN TO WOODEND WM-472 NEW TREATMENT PLANT #5 EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN RICHARDS GOLF COURSE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE RICHARDS GOLF COURSE ART CENTER REVENUES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/22/2008 -- 5/22/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description SERVICES CUSTODIANS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART WORK SOLD EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARKING PERMITS GENERAL SUPPLIES LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY CLEANING SUPPLIES LAUNDRY LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CONFERENCES $ SCHOOLS 5/21/2008 8:11:22 Page - 8 Business Unit YORK OCCUPANCY CENT SVC PW BUILDING ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET REVOLVING PLANNING ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ENGINEERING GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 79.30 309476 5/22/2008 105420 FIKES SERVICES 37.28 AIR DEODORIZERS 185849 33344 5841.6162 37.28 309477 5/22/2008 104474 FILTERFRESH 143.48 COFFEE 00001084 185736 79470278 -2009 1552.6103 143.48 309478 5/22/2008 122236 FITZPATRICK, YASMIN BAUTISTA 63.21 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 185976 051208 5101.4413 63.21 309479 5122/2008 102727 FORCE AMERICA 6,707.35 TRUCK UPGRADE 00005404 186057 01300768 1305.6710 6,707.35 309480 5/22/2008 122550 FREEMAN, MISSY 44.00 PARKING PERMIT REFUND 185850 050908 4090.4751 44.00 309481 5/22/2008 111863 G & J PATCH AND PIN 43.25 HERITAGE AWARD PLAQUE 00004098 185737 008540 1140.6406 43.25 309482 5122/2008 100764 G & K SERVICES 77.68 185851 043008 5511.6201 184.28 185851 043008 5913.6201 426.60 185851 043008 1646.6201 454.68 185851 043008 1552.6511 581.12 185851 043008 1301.6201 625.94 185851 043008 1553.6201 2,350.30 309483 5/22/2008 115314 GALAXY COMPUTER INC. 420.68 HARD DRIVE 185738 3552 1260.6710 420.68 309484 5/22/2008 105959 GARFIN, JEFFREY 241.54 SEMINAR EXPENSE 186058 040308 1470.6104 241.54 SERVICES CUSTODIANS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART WORK SOLD EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PARKING PERMITS GENERAL SUPPLIES LAUNDRY LAUNDRY LAUNDRY CLEANING SUPPLIES LAUNDRY LAUNDRY EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CONFERENCES $ SCHOOLS 5/21/2008 8:11:22 Page - 8 Business Unit YORK OCCUPANCY CENT SVC PW BUILDING ART CENTER REVENUES EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT STREET REVOLVING PLANNING ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ENGINEERING GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R56CKREL - JG20000 CITY MINA Council Check Register 5/22/2008 -5/22/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 309485 5122/2008 101662 GCSAA 160.00 ANNUAL DUES - BOB ATOL 186197 87446 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS J8 8:11:22 Page- 9 Business Unit GOLF ADMINISTRATION 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 1623.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 5840.6103 160.00 LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 5860.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 309486 5/2212008 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 105508 GEMPLER'S INC. 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL ADMINISTRATION 5410.6103 190.75 ANIMAL REPELLENT 00002153 185998 1011488106 2210.6124 190.75 COMMUNICATIONS 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 309487 5/22/2008 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 100772 GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS 5860.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 1,448.40 OFFICE CHAIRS 00008019 185739 305408 GOLF ADMINISTRATION 1,448.40 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAKES 2210.6124. WEB DEVELOPMENT 309488 5/22/2008 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 2,002.00 TENNIS T- SHIRTS 185740 76447 2,002.00 309489 5/22/2008 103185 GERTENS 405.21 TREES, TOPSOIL 00005831 185741 143131 11.16 WOOD MULCH 00005652 185742 142028 416.37 309490 5122/2008 119936 GLOBAL OAK 6.25 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 185999 519 6.25 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 185999 519 6.25 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 185999 519 75.00 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 185999 519 93.75 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 185999 519 243.75 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 185999 _ 519 2,587.75 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 185999 519 75.00 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 186000 516 100.00 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 186000 516 100.00 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 186000 516 100.00 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 186000 516 112.50 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 186000 516 693.75 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 186000 516 1,012.75 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 186000 516 5,213.00 309491 5/22/2008 102645 GRAFFITI CONTROL SERVICES 141.11 GRAFFITI REMOVAL 00005852 185743 215 141.11 J8 8:11:22 Page- 9 Business Unit GOLF ADMINISTRATION 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 1623.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES TENNIS INSTRUCTION 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 1644.6541 PLANTINGS & TREES TREES & MAINTENANCE 5840.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 5860.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 5820.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET GENERAL 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL ADMINISTRATION 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 5840.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 5860.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 5820.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 50TH STREET GENERAL 5410.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 5630.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAKES 2210.6124. WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/21/2008 8:11:22 Council Check Register Page - 10 5/22/2008 -5/22/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 309492 5122/2008 101103 GRAINGER 22.79 COUPLERS 00005939 185744 9633529616 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 526.87 FLOODLIGHTS, SLIPFITTERS 00001015 185745 9632639408 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 27.00 PRY BAR 00005971 185746 9629891772 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 443.83 MARKING PAINT 00005971 185746 9629891772 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 72.65 SPOTLIGHTS 00001036 186001 9635435564 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 675.74 AIR CONDITIONER 00002149 186002 9629891780 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 37.54 ELECTRICAL PARTS 00002310 186059 9633529608 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,806.42 309493 5/22/2008 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC 435.00 185923 00021324 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD'WINE YORK SELLING 435.00 309494 512212008 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 235.90 185924 100318 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 355.85 185925 100412 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,105.45 185926 100414 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,123.50 186098 100455 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 101.95 186099 100453 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 353.85 186100 100515 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,276.50 309495 5122/2008. 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 100.00 FLOWERS, PLANTERS 186060 051608 5841.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK OCCUPANCY 189.61 FLOWERS, PLANTERS 186060 051608 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 289.61 309496 5/22/2008 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 154.28 CONDUIT, COVERS, PVC 00005906 185747 933525623 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 59.06 CONDUIT, FITTINGS, PVC 00001008 185853 933833485 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 213.34 309497 5/22/2008 101350 GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO. 613.93 IRRIGATION SYSTEM STARTUP 00001063 185854 080950 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW REVOLVING 613.93 309498 5/22/2008 120559 GREENHALGH, SARA 70.20 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 185978 051208 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES .70.20 R55CKRE, jG20000 CITY dNA L J8 8:11:22 Council Check Register Page - 11 5/22/2008 -5/22/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 309499 5/2212008 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 917.25 185927 46283 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,299.30 185928 52551 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,312.56 185929 52552 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 944.40 185930 52557 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 918.39 185931 52556 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 7,090.61 185932 52561 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2.30 185933 52487 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,672.81 185934 45140 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,550.54 185935 52560 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 65.15- 185936 751135 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 72.10- 185937 •750670 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,899.50 186101 41955 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 74.90 186102 53118 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 85.57- 186103 751632 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 22,459.74 309500 5/2212008 121379 GRIMES, JUDITH 1,180.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 184629 042508 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,180.00 309501 5/22/2008 100155 GRITTON, KAY 92.30 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 185977 051208 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 92.30 309502 5/22/2008 100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT 134.03 FORESTRY TOOLS 00005844 185855 55377 1644.6556 TOOLS TREES & MAINTENANCE 479.25 BACK PACK BLOWER 00005844 185856 8870 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 613.28 309503 5/22/2008 122555 GUBRUD, ROBERT 30.74 SUPPLIES FOR ENERGY FAIR 186208 051908 1122.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM 30.74 309504 5/22/2008 102869 GUEST, LISA 75.40 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 185979 051208 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 75.40 309505 5/22/2008 101964 GUSTAVE A. LARSON CO. 574.54 COOLER 00001022 185852 BLM0112447 5860.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 574.54 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/2112008 8:11:22 Council Check Register Page - 12 5/22/2008 —5/2212008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 309506 5/22/2008 114566 HARTKE, BRENDA 54.60 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 185980 051208 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 54.60 309507 5/22/2008 100797 HAWKINS INC. 2,390.85 TONKAZORB 00005755 185748 1184096 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 3,436.90 CHEMICALS 00005755 185749 1184097 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 2,390.85 TONKAZORB 00005755 185857 1185063 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 8,218.60 309508 5/22/2008 119474 HAY DOBBS 76.49 ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES 186174 6004.006 -13 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 76.49 309509 5/22/2008 122093 HEALTH PARTNERS 151,667.30 PREMIUM 186061 29756083 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 14,617.58 PREMIUM 186062 29755810 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 166,284.88 309510 5/22/2008 101576 HEGGIES PIZZA 40.50 PIZZA 186043 1017356 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 40.50 309511 5/22/2008 105436 HENNEPIN COUNTY INFORMATION 1,724.77 RADIO ADMIN FEE 185750 28048016 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 143.20 RADIO ADMIN FEE 00001103 185858 28048080 1553.6237 RADIO SERVICE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,867.97 309512 5/22/2008 101215 HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFI 679.05 APRIL 2008 - BOOKING FEES 185751 1984 1195.6170 COURT CHARGES LEGAL SERVICES 679.05 309513 5/22/2008 118765 HENRY SCHEIN INC. 57.40 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003603 186175 1372702 -01 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 57.40 309514 5/22/2008 116680 HEWLETT - PACKARD COMPANY 227.91 LCD MONITOR 00004366 185752 44159646 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 744.44 COLOR LASER JET 00004367 185753 44189028 5610.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION 972.35 309515 5/22/2008 1 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. R58CKRE%. )G20000 CITY INA J8 8:11:22 Council Check Register Page - 13 5/22/2008 -5/22/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,308.01 186104 452156 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 726.88 186105 452163 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,034.89 309516 5122/2008 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 294.42 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 185859 050808 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 294.42 309517 5/22/2008 100842 HSBC BUSINESS SOLUTIONS 158.60 OFFICEMAX SUPPLIES 186044 050608 5610.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION 158.60 309518 5/2212008 100812 IAAO 500.00 - CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 185860 051408 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 500.00 309519 5/22/2008 121161 IDEARC MEDIA CORP 133.66 DIRECTORY LISTING 185861 390013288802 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 133.66 DIRECTORY LISTING 185861 390013288802 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 133.68 DIRECTORY LISTING 185861 390013288802 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 401.00 309520 512212008 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS CORP. 73.12 TUBING, ELBOWS 00005822 185754 518389 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 16.74 PVC PIPE, COUPLINGS 00005840 186063 519909 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 89.86 309521 5122/2008 100829 JERRY'S HARDWARE 2.25 186064 050808 1554.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 3.90 186064 050808 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 19.94 186064 050808 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 23.82 186064 050808 1495.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES INSPECTIONS 24.64 186064 050808 5840.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 28.07 186064 050808 5511.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 40.22 186064 050808 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 48.48 186064 050808 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50.91 186064 050808 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 51.45 186064 050808 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 64.20 186064 050808 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 72.07 186064 050808 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING 89.41 186064 050808 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 92.02 186064 050808 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/21/2008 8:11:22 Council Check Register Page - 14 5/22/2008 --5/22/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 104.24 186064 050808 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 113.51 186064 050808 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 139.47 186064 050808 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 150.13 186064 050808 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 157.87 186064 050808 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 253.90 186064 050808 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 279.42 186064 050808 5422.6556 TOOLS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 480.12 186064 050808 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 772.03 186064 050808 4091.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRANDVIEW REVOLVING 1,337.47 186064 050808 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 4,399.54 309522 5122/2008 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 122.60 186045 904482 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 128.00 186106 1160933 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,339.95 186107 1160925 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 508.20 186108 1160936 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,307.47 186109 1160926 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 32.00 186110 1160935 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 9,861.80 186111 1160934 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 16,300.02 309524 5/22/2008 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1.12 186112 1440893 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,213.31 186113 1440892 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 486.72 186114 1440889 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,112.32 186115 1440885 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 695.54 186116 1440891 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,048.67 186117 1440895 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 197.12 186118 1440886 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,935.15 186119 1440890 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 3,102.28 186120 1436580 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1.12 186121 1436581 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 36.11 186122 1440902 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,374.39 186123 1440901 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1.12 186124 1440900 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4,292.17 186125 1440899 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 677.34 186126 1440896 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 505.60 186127 1440887 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 273.84 186128 1440898 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 667.99 186129 1440897 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,681.28 186130 1440903 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKRE(> JG20000 CITY INA 11 J8 8:11:22 Council Check Register. Page - 15 ART WORK SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER REVENUES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONSULTING DESIGN WM-466 WOODLAND LN TO WOODEND REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5/22/2008 --5/22/2008 WEED SPRAY GENERAL TURF CARE Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,971.20 186131 1440888 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 902.79 186132 1440883 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 197.12 186133 1440882 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 244.94 186134 1440880 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 35.11 186135 1436595 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 939.68 186136 1440884 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 656.92 186137 1440881 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 13.09 186138 1440879 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING ART WORK SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER REVENUES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONSULTING DESIGN WM-466 WOODLAND LN TO WOODEND REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 28,264.04 GENERAL TURF CARE WEED SPRAY GENERAL TURF CARE WEED SPRAY GENERAL TURF CARE 309525 5/22/2008 118069 JOYCE, CYNTHIA 61.10 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 185981 051208 5101.4413 61.10 309526 5/2212008 100553 KEEHR, GREGORY 141.55 TASTING CUPS 186046 051408 5840.6406 141.55 309527 5/22/2008 116876 LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES 15.74 TRANSLATOR 186176 0926028- 2008 -04 1470.6103 15.74 309528 5/22/2008 122523 LARSON, RUTH 5,900.00 PERMANENT UTILITY EASEMENT 186003 050908 05466.1705.20 5,900.00 309529 5/22/2008 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 301.59 'CAPSCREWS, WASHERS 00005974 185755 6806407 1553.6530 301.59 309530 512212008 100855 LESCO INC. 1,672.71 WEED SPRAY 00005646 185862 FOCDBD36 1643.6546 1,672.71 WEED SPRAY 00005647 185863 55BC834A 1643.6546 310.64 PESTICIDE SUPPLIES 00005649 185864 73801DC0 1643.6546 3,656.06 309531 5122/2008 113827 LIGHTNING CONCEPTS 65.00 REPAIR SIGN 185865 1023 5841.6530 65.00 309532 5/22/2008 100558 LIND ELECTRONICS INC. 267.70 POWER SUPPLIER/CABLES 00003118 186065 218093 1400.6160 ART WORK SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER REVENUES LIQUOR YORK GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONSULTING DESIGN WM-466 WOODLAND LN TO WOODEND REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN WEED SPRAY GENERAL TURF CARE WEED SPRAY GENERAL TURF CARE WEED SPRAY GENERAL TURF CARE REPAIR PARTS YORK OCCUPANCY DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/21/2008 8:11:22 Council Check Register Page - 16 5/22/2008 5/22/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Descrip0on Business Unit 267.70 309533 5/22/2008 106301 LOFFLER COMPANIES INC. 78.68 COPIER USAGE 00001512 186066 76775 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 78.68 309534 5/22/2008 100858 LOGIS 1,257.00 186206 29402 1554.6160 DATA.PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,526.50 186206 29402 1120.6160 DATA PROCESSING ADMINISTRATION 2,694.00 186206 29402 1554.6160 DATA PROCESSING CENT SERV GEN - MIS 2,717.00 186206 29402 1495.6160 DATA PROCESSING INSPECTIONS 4,760.00 186206 29402 1190.6160 DATA PROCESSING ASSESSING 5,194.00 186206 29402 5910.6160 DATA PROCESSING GENERAL (BILLING) 5,658.50 186206 29402 1160.6160 DATA PROCESSING FINANCE 24,807.00 309535 5122/2008 122204 LUTHER BROOKDALE CHEVROLET 233.64 METER ASSEMBLY 00001039 186004 229654CVW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 233.64 309536 5/22/2008 100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 723.90 HOSE 00001023 185866 2083576 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 723.90 309537 5122/2008 117804 MALLOY MONTAGUE KARNOWSKI 600.00 2007 AUDIT 186005 22134 5110.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 600.00 2007 AUDIT 186005 22134 5310.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT POOL ADMINISTRATION 2,000.00 2007 AUDIT 186005 22134 5820.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV -AUDIT 50TH STREET GENERAL 2,000.00 2007 AUDIT 186005 22134 5840.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 2,000.00 2007 AUDIT 186005 22134 5860.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 2,000.00 2007 AUDIT 186005 22134 4502.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT FAIRVIEW FEE 2,000.00 2007 AUDIT 186005 22134 5410.6130 PROFESSIONAL SERV - AUDIT GOLF ADMINISTRATION 11,200.00 . 309538 5/22/2008 100868 MARK VII SALES 3,465.10 185938 322106 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 72.80 185939 322107 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,954.31 185940 321273 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 200.00 185941 321576 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 3,290.40 185942 321575 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,324.75 185943 321045 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,361.98 186139 323714 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREk G20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 309539 5/22/2008 CITY INA Council Check Register 5/22/2008 -5/22/2008 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 186140 323912 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 180.00 185756 43388 67.50 185867 43078 67.50 185868 43187 67.50 186067 43475 309540 5/22/2008 TELEPHONE 100875 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC. 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1550.6188 2,343.00 TREE AND INSTALLATION 00002125 186006 43173 5620.6620 1,673.12 MULCH 5620.6620 186007 44461 1301.6556 4,016.12 GENERAL MAINTENANCE 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS' 309541 5/22/2008 GENERAL SUPPLIES 101254 MCCORMICK, CAROL 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 100.00 PERFORMANCE 5/27/08 186193 051908 100.00 309542 5122/2008 101483 MENARDS 469.49 LADDER, NAILS, SCREWS 00005826 185757 28371 59.84 SHOVELS, RAKES 00001003 185758 28701 73.23 BRICK TROWELS, GROOVER 00001021 185759 30300 84.81 DREMEL TOOL 00005653 185760 26226 241.84 LADDER, PLYWOOD 00005824 185761 26787 109.93 LUMBER, DECKSCREWS 00002097 185762 28147 86.04 BRUSHES, SANDER, NAILS 00001011 185763 29697 121.64 SCOOPS, TOTES, PAILS 00006036 186047 30891 20.74 LIGHTBULBS, BOLTS, SCREWS 00006037 186048 30931 71.91 LUMBER, SANDPAPER 00002307 186068 29973 1,339.47 309543 5/22/2008 101987 MENARDS 179.40 TRAY LINERS, ROLLER COVERS 00002097 185764 85227 133.89 PUMPS, HOSE ADAPTERS 00002300 185765 84649 313.29 309544 5/22/2008 102281 MENARDS 22.07 SHELF BRACKETS, POWERLAG 00005656 185766 44570 22.07 309545 5/22/2008 100882 MERIT SUPPLY J8 8:11:22 Page - 17 Business Unit YORK SELLING 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1646.6577 LUMBER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS' 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 5630.6406. GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/21/2008 8:11:22 Council Check Register Page - 18 5/22/2008 --5/22/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 200.37 DEGREASER 00001010 185767 73973 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 625.16 TOWEL & SOAP DISPENSERS 00001009 185768 73980 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 825.53 309546 5/22/2008 120605 METEORLOGIX 1,104.00 WEATHER SERVICE 00001087 185769 2304881 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,104.00 309547 5/2212008 101891 METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY 159.59 LINE MARKING PAINT 00005838 185770 107307 1642.6544 LINE MARKING POWDER FIELD MAINTENANCE 173.33 FIELD NETTING 00005853 185771 106982 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 55.33 FIELD RAKE 00005820 185772 107089 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,330.98 BASEBALL SUPPLIES 00005778 185773 107379 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 182.59 BASEBALL SUPPLIES 00001028 185774 107278 1642.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIELD MAINTENANCE 215.93 TENNIS CRANKS 00005655 185775 107341 1647.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 2,117.75 309548 5/22/2008 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 79,497.00 APRIL 2008 185776 050208 1495.4307 SAC CHARGES INSPECTIONS 79,497.00 309549 5/22/2008 104650 MICRO CENTER 25.53 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 00004368 185777 1776943 5910.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL (BILLING) 52.11 COMPUTER SUPPLIES 00004368 185777 1776943 5310.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL ADMINISTRATION 8.92 LATE FEE CHARGE 00009336 186203 L01744295 5125.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT MEDIA STUDIO 86.56 309550 5122/2008 118464 MIDWEST TESTING 3,238.75 METER TESTING 00005682 185778 780 5917.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS METER REPAIR 3,238.75 309551 5/22/2008 100351 MIKE'S SHOE REPAIR INC. 14.00 GEAR REPAIRS 186177 5092008 1470.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 14.00 309552 5/2212008 100895 MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORPOR 68.00 SPLINE SHANK 00001012 185779 7631160 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 68.00 309553 5/22/2008 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,760.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 00005693 185780 33140 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION 1,760.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 00005691 185781 33144 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION R59CKREL JG20000 249.00 CITY INA 309560 5/22/2008 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 309556 Council Check Register 100330 MINNESOTA STATE FIRE MARSHAL PUMP ASSEMBLY, WHEEL NUTS 00001040 186008 5122/2008 --5/22/2008 REPAIR PARTS Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 1,760.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 00005692 185782 33139 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAY1008 5,280.00 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CM450789F6W 1553.6530 22.00 309554 5/22/2008 100311 MINNESOTA RESTURANT ASSOCIATIO 309557 5/22/2008 240.00 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP 186049 99139 -2008 5410.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 74.75 240.00 185982 176.18 REPAIRS 00005621 185783 309555 5/2212008 1643.6180 118129 MINNESOTA SOCIETY OF CPA'S 2,458.87 J8 8:11:22 Page - 19 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION GOLF ADMINISTRATION 249.00 MEMBER ID# 16850 186071 SEMINAR 1160.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FINANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL TURF CARE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES 135.00 RECERTIFICATION FEES 186069 051408 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 135.00 249.00 309560 5/22/2008 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 309556 5/22/2008 100330 MINNESOTA STATE FIRE MARSHAL PUMP ASSEMBLY, WHEEL NUTS 00001040 186008 455358F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 69.23 12.00 FEB 27 TRAINING FEE 186178 051008 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS JOINT ASSEMBLIES 00005797 186010 10.00 MAR 25 TRAINING FEE 186179 MAY1008 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS CM450789F6W 1553.6530 22.00 211.72 309557 5/22/2008 120789 MOURAD, MOONEEN 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 74.75 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 185982 176.18 REPAIRS 00005621 185783 0076195 -IN 1643.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2,458.87 WATER TANKER MODIFICATIONS 00005850 185784 0076188 -IN 1650.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 1,992.88 2,635.05 00002325 186072 613624 -00 5630.6540 FERTILIZER 309558 e 5/22/2008 101385 MITY-LITE INC 1,449.66 TABLES 00002317 186070 IN- 475182 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,449.66 309559 5/22/2008 101917 MN FIRE SERVICE CERTIFICATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL TURF CARE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES 135.00 RECERTIFICATION FEES 186069 051408 1470.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 135.00 309560 5/22/2008 121491 MORRIE'S PARTS & SERVICE GROUP 163.28 PUMP ASSEMBLY, WHEEL NUTS 00001040 186008 455358F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 69.23 LINKS 00005797 186009 455288F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 81.45 JOINT ASSEMBLIES 00005797 186010 455287F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 102.24- CREDIT 00001750 186011 CM450789F6W 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 211.72 309561 5/2212008 120789 MOURAD, MOONEEN 74.75 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 185982 051208 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 74.75 309562 5/22/2008 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 1,992.88 FERTILIZER, FUNGICIDE 00002325 186072 613624 -00 5630.6540 FERTILIZER EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER REVENUES CENTENNIAL LAKES R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/22/2008 --5/2212008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1,992.88 309563 5122/2008 101687 NASCO 308.19 ARTS & CRAFTS 185785 363779 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/21/2008 8:11:22 Page - 20 Business Unit PLAYGROUND & THEATER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING CONSULTING DESIGN WM483 WELLHOUSE 5233 HALIFAX GENERAL SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 308.19 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 309564 5/22/2008 105066 NATURAL REFLECTIONS VII LLC 485.16 COMPRESSOR & FAN REPAIRS 00005854 185786 1060 4086.6103 485.16 309565 5/22/2008 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPP 228.07 STEEL PIPES & TUBES 00005796 185869 136279 1553.6530 228.07 309566 5/22/2008 105901 OERTEL ARCHITECTS 53,066.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 185787 050808#4 4402.6710 3,070.00 CONSULTING SERVICES 185788 050808 #5 05483.1705.20 56,136.00 309567 5/22/2008. 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 143.75 TONER 186012 429856926 -001 5610.6406 513.86 OFFICE SUPPLIES 186013 429181827 -001 5610.6513 657.61 309568 5/22/2008 101659 ORKIN PEST CONTROL 588.33 PEST CONTROL (5 /08 -4/09) 186180 ACCT #6881124 1470.6103 588.33 309569 5/22/2008 103624 P & L AUTOMOTIVE INC. 380.00 SPRAY ON BEDLINER 00005856 185789 181697 1650.6710 380.00 SPRAY ON BEDLINER 00005857 185790 182280 1650.6710 760.00 309570 5/22/2008 102440 PASS, GRACE 102.70 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 185983 051208 5101.4413 102.70 309571 5122/2008 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 598.00 185944 8184738 -IN 5842.5513 2,385.00 185945 8184799 -IN 5842.5513 2,841.00 185946 8184802 -IN 5862.5513 163.50 185947 8184128 -IN 5822.5513 5/21/2008 8:11:22 Page - 20 Business Unit PLAYGROUND & THEATER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT PW BUILDING CONSULTING DESIGN WM483 WELLHOUSE 5233 HALIFAX GENERAL SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION OFFICE SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING R5$CKREt- _)G20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 16.00 - 112.00- 1,549.81 7,409.31 186142 309572 5/22/2008 110832 PC2 SOLUTIONS INC. 1,454.45 TECHNICAL SERVICES 1,200.00 TECHNICAL SERVICES 2,654.45 Subledger Account Description 309573 5/2212008 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY Rrm 12 5862.5513 185870 41908009 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 185871 503QB005 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 185791 03274336 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 186050 04345586 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 309574 5/22/2008 CITY ]NA L J8 8:11:22 Council Check Register Page - 21 186142 5/22/2008 -5/22/2008 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit . 185948 8184039 -CM 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 185949 8184172 -CM 5822.5513 COST-OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 186141 8184801 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 185870 41908009 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 185871 503QB005 1554.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SERV GEN - MIS 185791 03274336 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 186050 04345586 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 309574 5/22/2008 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 4,000.51 186142 2607721 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 45.07 186143 2607723 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,909.99 186144 2607722 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 37.12 186145 2607720 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,798.16 186146 20607719 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,121.56 186147 2607727 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5,310.38 186148 2607726 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 98.24 186149 2607725 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,975.73 186150 2607724 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,427.23 186151 2607715 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 49.12 186152 2607716 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 2,456.58 186153 2607718 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 210.01 186154 2607717 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 21,439.70 309575 5/22/2008 100954 PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO. 53.24 STUDS, WHEEL NUTS 00005790 185872 1- 875804 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 53.24 309576 5/22/2008 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 159.48 CENTERING PINS 00001109 186014 843837 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 159.48 309577 5/2212008 100819 POPP.COM 115.00' WIRING FOR TELEPHONE JACK 00002318 186073 90649 5630.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAKES 115.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/22/2008 -- 5/22/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 309578 5/22/2008 102884 PRAIRIE LAWN & GARDEN 39.44 PARTS FOR TRIMMERS 00002312 185792 122716 5630.6406 30.00 PARTS FOR TRIMMERS 00002312 185793 122717 5630.6406 69.44 309579 5/2212008 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 1,286.45 185950 52559 427.14 186155 52555 680.00 186156 35992 2,393.59 309580 5/2212008 100969 PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING ENGINEE 787.50 ENGINEERING SERVICES 185794 07037.06 1,966.77 ENGINEERING SERVICES 185795 07022.13 1,985.00 WELL PIPING DESIGN 186181 08016.01 4,739.27 309581 5/22/2008 100971 QUALITY WINE 622.00 2,274.52 279.10 3,303.52 137.60 1,666.50 997.70 628.80 2,282.17 335.20 1,049.30 899.94 80.00 - 6.83- 1,194.81 720.60 28.50- 16,234.44 309582 5/22/2008 101965 QWEST 746.72 612 E01 -0426 284.88 612 E24 -8656 185951 010393 -00 185952 010106 -00 185953 009352 -00 185954 010181 -00 185955 010176 -00 185956 010287 -00 185957 010107 -00 185958 008125 -00 185959 010108 -00 185960 010394 -00 185961 009353 -00 185962 010110 -00 185963 991374 -00 185964 989351 -00 186157 010111 -00 186158 011502 -00 186159 009739 -00 186160 011249 -00 185873 0426 -5/08 185874 8656 -5/08 5842.5513 5822.5513 5842.5513 05481.1705.20 05471.1705.20 05483.1705.20 5842.5512 5842.5513 5842.5513 5842.5512 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5862.5512 5862.5512 5822.5513 5822.5513 5862.5513 5862.5513 5822.5512 5862.5512 5842.5512 5842.5513 1550.6188 1628.6188 Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN CONSULTING DESIGN 5/21/2008 8:11:22 Page- 22 Business Unit CENTENNIAL LAKES CENTENNIAL LAKES YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING WM481 M'SIDE H2OMAIN PIPELINE WM-471 NEW WELL #20 WM-483 WELLHOUSE 5233 HALIFAX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING TELEPHONE TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL SENIOR CITIZENS CITY ANA t.. J8 8:11:22 R55CKREG _JG20000 Council Check Register Page - 23 5/22/2008 -- 5/2212008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 507.72 612 E24 -8657 185875 8657 - 5/08 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 284.88 612 E24 -8661 185876 8661 -5/08 5111.6188 TELEPHONE ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT 507.52 612 E01 -8391 185877 8391 -5/08 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL . 507.52 612 E01 -8392 185878 8392 -5/08 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 2,839.24 309583 5/22/2008 100466 R & R PRODUCTS INC. 450.19 ROLLERS 00001030 185879 CD1093732 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 450.19 309584 5/22/2008 101111 REED BUSINESS INFORMATION 163.80 PUBLISH AD FOR BID 186182 3919934 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 159.12 PUBLISH AD FOR BID 186183 3919936 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 168.48 PUBLISH AD FOR BID 186184 3919935 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 159.12 PUBLISH AD FOR BID 186185 3925438 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 168.48 PUBLISH AD FOR BID 186186 3925437 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 393.12 PUBLISH AD FOR BID 186187 3925436 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 1,212.12 309585 5122/2008 104793 RESTORATION SYSTEMS INC. 377.32 HYDRANT USAGE REFUND 186074 051608 5901.4626 SALE OF WATER UTILITY REVENUES 377.32 309586 5/22/2008 118658 RIGHTWAY GLASS INC. 178.78 REPLACE WINDSHIELD 00001116 186015 49364 1553.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 178.78 309587 5/2212008 101963 S & S SPECIALISTS 247.50 TREE INSPECTIONS 00005851 185796 19140 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 247.50 309588 5/22/2008 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 39.62 BAKERY 186051 215176 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 39.62 309589 5/22/2008 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 200.25 101 - 21373069350 186199 TABLES 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 200.25 309590 5/2212008 100990 SCHARBER & SONS 53.85 PUMP, CLAMPS, FILTERS 00005799 185880 1000870 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 53.85 R55CKREG LOG20000 215.00 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/22/2008: 122471 SEED SOLUTIONS 5/22/2008 -- 5/22/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 00005626 185799 309591 5/22/2008 1643.6540 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 528.88 20.39 ROOF NAILS, STAPLES 00005636 185797 40619966 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 11.89 VULKEM 00005643 185798 40619635 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 32.28 309592 5/22/2008 187.39 106506 SCHMIT TOWING INC. 00001014 185800 795412 5/21/2008 8:11:22 Page - 24 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 250.00 TRAINING VEHICLES 186188 91211,91212 1470.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 250.00 309593 5/2212008 100349 SCOTT COUNTY 230.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 186016 051508 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET 230.00 309594. 5/22/2008 100349 SCOTT COUNTY 215.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 186017 5/15/2008 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET GENERAL TURF CARE DISTRIBUTION PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO WM ART CENTER REVENUES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 296.49 BANNER 186196 2440 1122.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM 296.49 215.00 309595 5/22/2008: 122471 SEED SOLUTIONS 528.88 FERTILIZER $ SEED 00005626 185799 5525718 1643.6540 FERTILIZER 528.88 309596 5/22/2008 100994 SEELYE PLASTICS 187.39 CAMLOCKS, TUBING 00001014 185800 795412 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 187.39 309597 5/2212008 100995 SEH 1,126.72 BID DOCUMENT PREP 185801 201938 05436.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 1,126.72 309598 5/22/2008 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 191.75 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 185984 051208 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD 191.75 309599 5/22/2008 120997 SHIRTYSOMETHING 331.60 UNIFORMS 00003634 186189 16157 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS 331.60 309600 5122/2008 120784 SIGN PRO GENERAL TURF CARE DISTRIBUTION PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO WM ART CENTER REVENUES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 296.49 BANNER 186196 2440 1122.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM 296.49 R55CKRE. -jG20000 PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL TELEPHONE STREET REVOLVING TELEPHONE CITY JNA YORK OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC HEALTH TELEPHONE PLANNING Council Check Register ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 5/22/2008 - 5/22/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 309601 5/22/2008 CENT SERV GEN - MIS TELEPHONE 117179 SIGNAL PRO EQUIPMENT TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 132.71 INSPECTIONS FILTERS, AIR FOIL BLADES 00005629 185881 60026 1553.6530 TELEPHONE 132.71 309602 5/22/2008 101000 SIR SPEEDY 394.85 APPLICATION PRINTING 186190 57295 1550.6406 394.85 309603 5/22/2008 110977 SOW, ADAMA 102.05 . ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 185985 051208 5101.4413 102.05 309604 5/22/2008 122455 SPRING LAKE ENGINEERING 800.00 PROGRAMMING SERVICES 00005694 185882 1029 5921.6180 800.00 309605 5/22/2008 116856 SPRINT 894.24 NEW ACCT# 381708818 186076 381708818 1400.6160 894.24 309606 5122/2008 104672 SPRINT / NEXTEL 14.04 186052 873184124 -065 1240.6188 30.60 186052 873184124 -065 4090.6188 32.36 186052 873184124 -065 7411.6188 32.40 186052 873184124 -065 5841.6188 53.92 186052 873184124 -065 1490.6406 54.14 186052 873184124 -065 1140.6188 61.84 186052 873184124 -065 1120.6188 70.74 186052 873184124 -065 1553.6188 86.58 186052 873184124 -065 1322.6188 109.99 186052 873184124 -065 7411.6188 131.88 186052 873184124 -065 2210.6188 143.98 186052 873184124 -065 1260.6188 149.99 186052 073184124 -065 5841.6188 154.55 186052 873184124 -065 1554.6230 195.84 186052 873184124 -065 1640.6188 210.42 186052 873184124 -065 1301.6188 226.00 186052 873184124 -065 1470.6188 308.54 186052 873184124 -065 1495.6188 376.25 186052 873184124 -065 5620.6230 631.08 186052 873184124 -065 5910.6188 1,167.37 186052 873184124 -065 1400.6188 Subledger Account Description REPAIR PARTS J8 8:11:22 Page - 25 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES CONTRACTED REPAIRS LIFT STATION MAINT DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE PUBLIC WORKS ADMIN GENERAL TELEPHONE STREET REVOLVING TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPLIES PUBLIC HEALTH TELEPHONE PLANNING TELEPHONE ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN TELEPHONE STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY TELEPHONE COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENT SERV GEN - MIS TELEPHONE PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL TELEPHONE GENERAL MAINTENANCE TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK TELEPHONE GENERAL (BILLING) TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 5/22/2008 -5/2212008 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5/21/2008 8:11:22 Page - 26 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ENGINEERING GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING POLICE COMPUTER SYSTEM POLICE COMPUTER SYSTEM GRILL 4,242.51 309607 512212008 101004 SPS.COMPANIES 20.93 TINNING FLUX, ACETYLENE 00005828 185802 S1841765.001 1646.6406 482.95 URINAL REPAIR KITS 00005819 185803 S1839723.001 1646.6530 26.15 RUBBER KIT, DRAIN CLEANER 00005837 185883 S1845826.001 1646.6406 452.75 COPPER TUBING 00001018 185884 S1845834.001 5913.6530 982.78 309608 5/22/2008 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC 58.37 HOSE ASSEMBLY 00005418 186018 SI64015 1553.6530 54.54 SWITCH 00005800 186019 SI64033 1553.6530 141.33 BATTERY 00005804 186020 S164126 1553.6530 254.24 309609 5/22/2008 101289 STRUZYK, JOSEPH 79.96 STRAPS FOR 6- WHEELER 186075 051408 1470.6406 79.96 309610 5/22/2008 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 25.72 CABLE 00005801 186021 109259CVW 1553.6530 9.29 PIN ASSEMBLIES 00005740 186022 108329CVW 1553.6530 35.01 309611 5/22/2008 - 121065 SULLIVAN, JACK 412.19 MPWA CONFERENCE 186204 051908 1260.6104 412.19 309612 5122/2008 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 523.00 TASTE OF EDINA AD 00016102 185804 1089087 5822.6122 523.00 TASTE OF EDINA AD 00016102 185804 1089087 5842.6122 523.00 TASTE OF EDINA AD 00016102 185804 1089087 5862.6122 1,569.00 309613 5/2212008 101910 SUNGARD PUBLIC SECTOR INC. 1,291.56 AIRFARE 186077 12249 4608.6710 6,210.00 PER DIEM 186078 12394 4608.6710 7,501.56 309614 512212008 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 37.00 BEER LINE CLEANING 186053 677549 5421.6102 37.00 GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER ADVERTISING OTHER EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5/21/2008 8:11:22 Page - 26 Business Unit BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ENGINEERING GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING POLICE COMPUTER SYSTEM POLICE COMPUTER SYSTEM GRILL R557CKREC. jG20000 CITY INA 5. j8 8:11:22 Council Check Register Page - 27 5/22/2008 - 5/22/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Suhledger Account Description Business Unit 309615 5/22/2008 122551 TAP PUBLISHING 73.95 1 YR SUBSCRIPTION 00006022 185892 1493186 - 2008042 5410.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT GOLF ADMINISTRATION 9 73.95 309616 5/22/2008 116920 TARGET COMMERCIAL INTERIORS 1,317.41 CHAIRS, FILE CABINETS 00002105 186023 525100 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 2,361.11 DESK AND CABINETS 00002109 186024 525101 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 3,678.52 309617 5/22/2008 105006 TASER INTERNATIONAL 650.00 NEW TASER 185805 S11106176 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL. 650.00 309618 5/22/2008 104932 TAYLOR MADE 546.95 MERCHANDISE 186054 10513110 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 546.95 309619 5/22/2008 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 40.91 CONNECTORS, PLUGS 00005788 185806 83059 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 40.91 309620 5/22/2008 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 577.00 186055 67559 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 169.20 186056 492114 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 2,213.30 186161 492123 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 85.20 186162 492122 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,044.70 309621 5/2212008 101293 TODD, DARRELL 158.57 BATTERIES 186079 051608 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 158.57 309622 5/22/2008 101038 TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY 24.74 WELDING RODS 00005739 185807 217509 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 104.96 WELDING RODS 00005785 185808 216951 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 62.79 WELDING GAS 00001080 185809 456066 5913.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 40.96 WELDING GAS 00001081 185810 456064 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 35.88 WELDING SUPPLIES 185811 456065 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 234.30 LEASE RENEWAL 00001097 185885 717577 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 503.63 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/21/2008 8:11:22 Council Check Register Page - 28 5/22/2008 --5/22/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 309623 5122/2008 101693 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS 148.04 SHELF LABELS 185886 22705 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 148.04 309624 5/22/2008 101048 TRI COUNTY BEVERAGE & SUPPLY 19.50 186163 205791 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 51.00 186163 205791 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 70.50 309625 5/22/2008 101042 TRIARCO 883.86 SUMMER CRAFT SUPPLIES 00007027 185812 358140 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 100.76 CRAFT SUPPLIES 00007027 186080 368682 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 984.62 309626 5122/2008. 116411 TRINITY MEDICAL SOLUTIONS INC. 708.50 UNIFORMS 186025 10060 5620.6201 LAUNDRY EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,149.35 UNIFORMS 00002316 186081 10069 5630.6201 LAUNDRY CENTENNIAL LAKES 1,857.85 309627 5/2212008 100682 TRUGREEN - CHEMLAWN 207.97 TURF CARE 00005855 186082 572515 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 475.00 TREE & SHRUB CARE 00005985 186083 573461 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 682.97 309628 5/2212008 101360 TWIN CITY HARDWARE 30.95 DOGGING KEYS 00005833 185887 296219 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 30.95 309629 5/22/2008 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 219.66 FERTILIZER 00005970 185813 18558 1642.6540 FERTILIZER FIELD MAINTENANCE 219.66 309630 5/22/2008 101049 UHL COMPANY 149.00 QUARTERLY SERVICE CONTRACT 00001090 185814 34906 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 149.00 309631 5/22/2008 122221 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC. 1,276.94 LEVEL LASER 00005911 185888 . 73374153 -001 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,276.94 309632 5/2212008 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. R55CKRE. JG20000 Cin dNA Council Check Register 5/22/2008 -- 5/22/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 283.51 PAGERS 185815 R0319246E 1400.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRST AID SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES TELEPHONE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE GENERAL SUPPLIES SAFETY EQUIPMENT ,08 8:11:22 Page- 29 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE YORK SELLING CLUB HOUSE PUBLIC HEALTH ADMINISTRATION PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 283.51 309633 5/22/2008 122554 VALLEY NATIONAL GASES LLC '58.79 OXYGEN 00003649 186191 822079 1470.651C 58.79 309634 5122/2008 103590 VALLEY -RICH CO. INC. 5,098.49 WATER MAIN REPAIR 00005690 185816 13278 5913.618C 2,760.17 WATER MAIN REPAIR 00005689 185817 13286 5913.618C 7,858.66 309635 5/22/2008 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 903.77 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00005842 185818 080445 -00 1646.640E 455.67 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 185889 080448 -00 5842.6512 1,359.44 309636 5/22/2008 102970 VERIZON WIRELESS .78 186207 1857066629 5420.6188 40.35 186207 1857066629 1490.6103 112.57 186207 1857066629 1120.6188 114.65 186207 1857066629 1640.6188 117.56 186207 1857066629 1600.6188 300.62 186207 1857066629 1470.6188 686.53 309637 5/22/2008 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 230.04 LOCKS KEYED 00005635 185890 222620 1646.6406 598.62 VESTS, CPR MASKS, GLOVES 00005843 185891 223323 1646.6610 828.66 309638 5/22/2008 101328 WALBRIDGE, DAVID 150.00 PERFORMANCE 5/29/08 186194 051908. 5610.6136 150.00 309639 5/22/2008 106699 WALSER CHRYSLER JEEP 287.98 ROTORS, PAD KIT 00005791 186026 1464388CHW 1553.6530 287.98 309640 5/22/2008 101944 WATERSTREET, JOAN M 148.27 UNIFORM PURCHASE 186084 051408 1400.6203 148.27 FIRST AID SUPPLIES CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES PAPER SUPPLIES TELEPHONE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE TELEPHONE GENERAL SUPPLIES SAFETY EQUIPMENT ,08 8:11:22 Page- 29 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION BUILDING MAINTENANCE YORK SELLING CLUB HOUSE PUBLIC HEALTH ADMINISTRATION PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/2112008 8:11:22 Council Check Register Page - 30 5/22/2008 5/22/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 309641 5/2212008 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 308.65 185965 193216 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 840.05 185966 193213 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,286.03 185967 193215 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,434.73 309642 5/22/2008 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1,424.61 186164 231227 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,385.60 186165 231225 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,385.60 186166 231226 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,468.01 186167 231228 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,168.89 186168 231224 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 543.10 186169 231404 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 8.25- 186170 37954 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 7,367.56 309643 5/2212008 117482 WINECONNECT INC. 499.12 WINE KIOSK 186027 57 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 499.12 309644 5/22/2008 112954 WISCONSIN TURF EQUIPMENT CORP. 86.91 'PAD KITS 00005494 185819 547026 -000 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 93.04 WASHERS, RINGS 00005372 185820 546723.000 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 179.95 309645 5/22/2008: 101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY 232.75 GOLF BALLS 00002315 186085 199652 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 232.75 309646 5/22/2008 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 882.00 185968 211497 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 447.50 185969 211439 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 517.88 185970 211440 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,847.38 309647 5/22/2008 120223 WORTHINGTON, HEATHER 780.95 CONFERENCE EXPENSES 186205 051908 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION 780.95 309648 5/22/2008 117828 WPS TRICARE 90.44 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 186192 BESSIE KRAUSE 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG —320000 CITY G. 4A Council Check Register 5/22/2008 –5/2212008 Check # Dale Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Suhledger Account Description 1500.6103 04339.1705.20 1260.6103 1260.6103 1260.6103 5913.6185 1552.6185 1322.6185 1375.6185 5510.6610 1553.6530 Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 812,911.75 Total Payments 812,911.75 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSULTING DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 51k. 8:11:22 Page - 31 Business Unit CONTINGENCIES STS -339 W70TH STORM IMP ENGINEERING GENERAL ENGINEERING GENERAL ENGINEERING GENERAL LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL LIGHT & POWER PARKING RAMP SAFETY EQUIPMENT ARENA ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 90.44 309649 5/22/2008 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 129.00 70TH ST TRAFFIC STUDY 185821 01686- 050 #14 86.00 70TH ST STORM SEWER/WATERMAIN 185822 01686 -090#4 2,079.00 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REVIEW 185823 01686 - 020 #10 135.00 TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE 185824 01686 - 030 #11 1,071.00 SE EDINA TRAFFIC MODEL 185825 01686 -060 #9 3,500.00 309650 5/22/2008 101726 XCEL ENERGY 18,824.42 51- 5605640 -1 185893 153001081 4,229.14 51- 5619094 -8 185894 152473352 199.43 51- 4197645 -8 185895 152442066 4,000.06 51- 5888961 -7 185896 152477763 27,253.05 309651 5/22/2008 101089 ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 69.23 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 00008046 185826 54063239 69.23 309652 512212008: 101091 ZIEGLER INC 46.56 FILTER, GASKET 00005795 185827 PC001071140 46.56 812,911.75 Grand Total 1500.6103 04339.1705.20 1260.6103 1260.6103 1260.6103 5913.6185 1552.6185 1322.6185 1375.6185 5510.6610 1553.6530 Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 812,911.75 Total Payments 812,911.75 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSULTING DESIGN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 51k. 8:11:22 Page - 31 Business Unit CONTINGENCIES STS -339 W70TH STORM IMP ENGINEERING GENERAL ENGINEERING GENERAL ENGINEERING GENERAL LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION LIGHT & POWER CENT SVC PW BUILDING LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL LIGHT & POWER PARKING RAMP SAFETY EQUIPMENT ARENA ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 5/22/2008 - 5/22/2008 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 366,317.19. 02100 CDBG FUND 23,260.00 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 3,983.96 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 77,700.01 05100 ART CENTER FUND 4,910.50 05200 GOLF DOME FUND 15,724.12 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 1,107.86 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 10,570.85 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 16,941.45 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 24,498.01 05800 LIQUOR FUND 179,703.89 05900 UTILITY FUND 87,349.28 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 86.00 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 758.63 Report Totals 812,911.75 We confirm to the best of our ImwMedge and beliefs that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing poPiespd .t 5/21/2008 8:13:03 Page- 1 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF __.,JA 5/2b,<. 6 8:33:51 Council Check Register Page - 1 5/29/2008 5/29/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 309653 5/29/2008 100613 AAA 14.50 DUPLICATE PLATES 186209 051908 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 14.50 309654 5129/2008 100613 AAA 1,140.99 T.E. PLATES FOR 70.292 186386 052108 1553.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,140.99 309655 5/29/2008 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 69.64 186296 498754 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 17.56 186297 0610531 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 119.64 186298 498756 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 53.08 186299 498755 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 52.12 186636 0720438 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 312.04 309656 5129/2008 100614 ACE SUPPLY CO. INC. 108.94 CRIMPER, COLLARS 00001113 186268 882062 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 108.94 309657 5129/2008 105162 ADT SECURITY SERVICES 29.41 ALARM SERVICE - MAY 2008 186346 69690852 5111.6250 ALARM SERVICE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 29.41 ALARM SERVICE - JUNE 2008 186347 71516017 5111.6250 ALARM SERVICE ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT 58.82 309658 5/2912008 102191 ADVANCED GRAPHIC SYSTEMS INC. 542.83 TONER CARTRIDGES 186419 INV00084446 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 542.83 309659 5/29/2008 120572 ADVANTAGE HEALTH CORPORATION 25.00 CANCELLATION FEE 186541 052308 1513.6218 EDUCATION PROGRAMS EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 25.00 309660 5/29/2008 102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES 976.08 READY MIX 00005752 186210 4216753 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 1,870.33 READY MIX 00005917 186211 4216570 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 433.91 READY MIX 00005917 186269 4216904 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 672.60 READY MIX 00005917 186270 4217102 1314.6520 CONCRETE STREET RENOVATION 410.04 CURB REPAIR 00005917 186542 4217292 5913.6520 CONCRETE DISTRIBUTION 4,362.96 309661 5/29/2008 105991 AL'S COFFEE COMPANY R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/28/2008 8:33:51 Council Check Register Page - 2 5/29/2008 —5/29/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 177.95 COFFEE 186417 126200 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 177.95 309662 5/29/2008 122200 ALDRITT, MARILYN 144.00 TRIP REFUND 186412 052208 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 144.00 309663 5/29/2008 112033 ALLDATA 1,500.00 SUBSCRIPTION 00001181 186271 17235741 1553.6160 DATA PROCESSING EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,500.00 309664 5/29/2008 120168 ALLIANCE ELECTRIC INC. 1,540.08 ELECTRICAL WORK 00002150 186599 5269 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,005.00 OUTLET INSTALLATION 00002133 186600 5267 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 319.90 WATERFALL REPAIR 00002140 186601 5268 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 2,864.98 309665 5/29/2008 100867 ALSTAD, MARIAN 562.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 186457 052208 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 562.00 309666 5/29/2008 102376 AMERICAN ART CLAY CO. INC. 56.52 CABLES 00009341 186348 1714269 5111.6530 REPAIR PARTS ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 56.52 309667 5/29/2008 101506 AMERICAN HOTEL REGISTER CO. 318.44 WIRE SHELVING 186602 7878653 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 318.44 309668 5/29/2008 121207 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF APPRAISERS 515.00 INTL APPRAISAL CONF 186674 052708 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 515.00 309669 5/29/2008 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 842.16 FOOD 186349 959322 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 842.16 309670 5/29/2008 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 43.77 SPRINKLER HEADS, FITTINGS 00001093 186272 24349 1318.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SNOW & ICE REMOVAL 243.89 SPRINKLERS 00001104 186273 24346 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 287.66 5/2,_.08 8:33:51 Page- 3 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 125.00 PERFORMANCE 6/03/08 186265 052108 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 186300 125.00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 186301 CITY O, _ INA 309674 5/29/2008 YORK SELLING 141.71 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. Council Check Register 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,675.00 186303 5/29/2008 5/2912008 337.50 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 309671 5/29/2008 288.65 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS 80801800 PLAN REVIEW 00005700 186545 145.88 COFFEE 186543 6013 -009010 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 13,950.00 145.88 DESIGN SERVICES 44744200 186546 309672 5/29/2008 CONSULTING DESIGN 122566 ASTECH 80802000 14,632.50 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 3,003.30 JOINT SEALER 00005754 186212 8 -065 1301.6519 ROAD OIL 309675 3,003.30 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 309673 5/29/2008 103241 BALDINGER, WENDY 5/2,_.08 8:33:51 Page- 3 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY GENERAL MAINTENANCE 125.00 PERFORMANCE 6/03/08 186265 052108 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION COLLECTION SYSTEMS WATER TREATMENT WM-483 WELLHOUSE 5233 HALIFAX GENERAL MAINTENANCE COLLECTION SYSTEMS EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK 606.75 186300 125.00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 475.50 186301 44744000 309674 5/29/2008 YORK SELLING 141.71 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 44662900 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,675.00 186303 44744100 337.50 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE GENERATOR SPECS 00005699 186544 2327H35 -1 5923.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER VERNON SELLING 288.65 345.00 80801800 PLAN REVIEW 00005700 186545 2327H730701 -2 5915.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 13,950.00 574.10 DESIGN SERVICES 44744200 186546 2327H738338 -1 05483.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 186637 80802000 14,632.50 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,094.59 309675 5129/2008 102195 BATTERIES PLUS 38.32 BATTERIES 00005935 186547 18- 205469 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 38.32 309676 5/29/2008 120447 BEC CORPORATION 798.27 PUMP TRANSMITTER 00005209 186548 13916 5923.6530 REPAIR PARTS 798.27 309677 5/29/2008 122593 BELDE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 312.20 JANITORIAL SERVICES - APR 2008 186603 7878653 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2,319.90 JANITORIAL SERVICES - MAY 2008 186604 788 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 2,632.10 309678 5/29/2008 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION COLLECTION SYSTEMS WATER TREATMENT WM-483 WELLHOUSE 5233 HALIFAX GENERAL MAINTENANCE COLLECTION SYSTEMS EDINBOROUGH PARK EDINBOROUGH PARK 606.75 186300 44746800 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 475.50 186301 44744000 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 141.71 186302 44662900 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 1,675.00 186303 44744100 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 162.35 186304 5660900 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 288.65 186305 80801800 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1.86 186488 44744300 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 574.10 186489 44744200 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 168.67 186637 80802000 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,094.59 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/2812008 8:33:51 Council Check Register Page - 4 5/29/2008 -- 5/29/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 309679 5129/2008 100661 BENN, BRADLEY 40.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 186458 052208 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 40.00 309680 5/29/2008 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 88.01 FOLDERS 186387 WO- 506281 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 22.79 ENVELOPES 186388 WO- 506334 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 200.84 OFFICE SUPPLIES 186389 WO- 506757 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 128.50 RECORDS BOXES 186390 WO- 507127 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 30.99 CUSTOM STAMP 186420 IN -14645 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 228.54 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003141 186421 WO- 506570 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 36.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES 186549 OE- 159347 -1 7410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES PSTF ADMINISTRATION 48.98 DISCS 00009043 186550 OE- 158587 -1 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 270.45 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00009071 186551 OE- 158561 -1 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,055.90 309681 5/29/2008 104053 BIOCLEAN MOBILE WASH INC. 1,235.93 WASH VEHICLES 00001192 186552 75982 1553.6238 CAR WASH EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,235.93 309682 5/2912008 119679 BIXBY PORTABLE TOILET SERVICE 73.45 TOILET SERVICE 00005999 186274 9711 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE 73.45 TOILET SERVICE 00005998 186275 9712 1642.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIELD MAINTENANCE 146.90 309683 5/29/2008 119631 BONNER & BORHART LLP 16,450.00 PROSECUTION 186605 36129 1195.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES 16,450.00 309684 5/29/2008 100873 BROCKWAY, MAUREEN 441.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 186459 052208 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 441.00 309685 5/29/2008 122250 BROWN, JEFF 145.44 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 186258 051208 1490.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS PUBLIC HEALTH 145.44 309686 5/29/2008 105390 CAHN, LIBBY 50.00 TRIP REFUND 186413 052208 1628.4392.07 SENIOR TRIPS SENIOR CITIZENS 50.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF -NA 5128/2uU8 8:33:51 Council Check Register Page - 5 5/29/2008 --5/29/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 309687 5/29/2008 105315 CALTON, BOB 270.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 186460 052208 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 270.00 309688 5/29/2008 102046 CAMPE, HARRIET 56.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 186462 052208 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY 216.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 186462 052208 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 272.00 309689 5/29/2008 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 136.40 186306 304995 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,454.00 186307 304998 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 842.30 186308 304993 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 65.00 186309 304992 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 167.75 186350 11094 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 434.75 186490 305025 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 6,100.20 309690 5/29/2008 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 86.37 5596524 -8 186351 051408 5430.6186 HEAT RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 295.76 7321604 -6 186422 MAY1408 1470.6186 HEAT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 4,610.66 5591458 -4 186553 051908 1551.6186 HEAT CITY HALL GENERAL 1,260.89 5584304 -9 186606 55843049 -5/08 7411.6186 HEAT PSTF OCCUPANCY 37.58 5584310 -6 186607 55843106 -5/08 7413.6186 HEAT PSTF FIRE TOWER . 6,291.26 309691. 5/29/2008 105851 CHANHASSEN DINNER THEATRES 2,108.00 42ND STREET - 719/08 186415 121079BAL 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 2,108.00 309692 512912008 119725 CHISAGO LAKES DISTRIBUTING CO 251.85 186310 364769 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 266.11 186311 364707 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 162.04 186638 364706 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 680.00 309693 5/29/2008 106402 CHURCHILL, LEE 505.00 OFFICIATING FEES 186596 052308 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 505.00 309694 5/29/2008 101850 CITY OF ST. PAUL 375.00 POLICE CYCLIST COURSE 186423 104541 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 508.00 CITY OF EDINA 309697 5/29/2008 Council Check Register 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 5/29/2008 --5/29/2008 Check # Dale Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 1301.6518 375.00 1,700.08 309695 5/29/2008 100689 CLAREYS SAFETY EQUIP. 309698 5/2912008 196.45 DOOR PLUNGERS, BUSHINGS 00001044 186213 117818 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 196.45 399.43 309696 5/29/2008 03269169 116304 CLAY, DON GENERAL SUPPLIES 5/28/2008 8:33:51 Page- 6 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 508.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 186461 052208 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING DISTRIBUTION . GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 508.00 309697 5/29/2008 121066 COMMERCIAL ASPHALT CO. 1,700.08 ASPHALT 00005749 186276 051508 1301.6518 BLACKTOP 1,700.08 309698 5/2912008 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 399.43 GLOVES, COVERALLS 00001038 186277 03269169 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 109.00 GLOVES, EARPLUGS 00001110 186391 03271663 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 123.46 GLOVES, EARPLUGS 00001110 186391 03271663 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 135.00 GLOVES, EARPLUGS 00001110 186391 03271663 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 766.89 309699 5/29/2008 100695 CONTINENTAL CLAY CO. 147.26 ART SUPPLIES 00009332 186352 INV000036044 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 49.76 UNDERGLAZE 00009338 186353 R200345853 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 117.24 ART SUPPLIES 00009332 186354 INV000035602 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES 915.00 ART SUPPLIES 00009332 186354 INV000035602 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,229.26 309700 5/29/2008 100701 CUSHMAN MOTOR CO. 452.08 SCARIFIER REPLACEMENT 00005837 186214 142742 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 452.08 309701 5/2912008 100130 DAKOTA COUNTY 100.00 NOTARY COMMISSION -TERRI WILSON 186355 052108 1120.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 100.00 309702 5/29/2008 122095 DAKOTA COUNTY LUMBER CO. 97.88 WOOD, ROOFERS FELT 00005654 186278 135199 1646.6577 LUMBER 121.19 FACIA, NAILS 00005978 186279 135576 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 219.07 309703 , 5/29/' 100710 DAVE'S DAIRY GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING DISTRIBUTION . GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ADMINISTRATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE BUILDING MAINTENANCE R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 164.31 DAIRY 164.31 309704 5/29/2008 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 3,717.66 CITY OF -_..JA Council Check Register 5/29/2008 -- 5129/2008 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 186356 051208 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 186312 457963 186313 457962 186639 457961 309705 5/29/2008 YORK SELLING' 103436 DENECKE, LEILA COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 324.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 186463 052208 324.00 309706 . 5/29/2008 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 55.26 BAKERY 186357 274042 103.60 BAKERY 186358 274126 100.38 BAKERY 186359 274138 259.24 309707 5/29/2008 118375 DEPAUL LETTERING 15.00 EMBROIDERED LOGOS 186424 3405 15.00 309708 5129/2008 122234 DEVRIES, NICHOLAS 168.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 186464 052208 168.00 309709 5/29/2008 101547 DVORAK, MARY 492.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 186465 052208 492.00 309710 5/29/2008 100739 EAGLE WINE 387.65 186314 56191 1,198.63 186315 56186 1,610.44 186491 56181 47.90 186640 56798 3,244.62 309711 5/2912008 100744 EDINA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 75.00 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE AD 186608 24282 75.00 CHAMBER MEMBER AD 186609 24281 400.00 EDINA LIQUOR AD 186610 24416 5/28,__ -., 8:33:51 Page - 7 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING' 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 5421.5510 5421.5510 5421.5510 1400.6203 5110.6103 5110.6103 5842.5513 5822.5513 5862.5513 5842.5513 5410.6122 5410.6122 5842.6122 COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD COST OF GOODS SOLD UNIFORM ALLOWANCE GRILL GRILL GRILL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING OTHER GOLF ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/28/2008 8:33:51 Council Check Register Page - 8 5129/2008 --5129/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 550.00 309712 5/29/2008 105417 EDINA HISTORICAL SOCIETY 10,000.00 GRANT 186554, 052208 1516.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES HISTORICAL SOCIETY 10,000.00 309713 5129/2008 105944 EMANUEL, LOU 101.00 OFFICIATING FEES 186593 052308 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 101.00 309714 5/2912008 117483 ENGELE, LEE 25.00 ENTERTAINMENT - BAL DUE 186611 052208 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 25.00 309715 5/29/2008 122549 FARNER - BOCKEN COMPANY 405.36 FOOD 186612 5363832 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 405.36 309716 5129/2008 100756 FEDERAL EXPRESS 10.00 SHIPPING CHARGES 186425 2- 697 -53663 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 10.00 309717 5/29/2008 120329 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES INC 124.29 BOOTS 00003658 186426 5674 1470.6552 PROTECTIVE CLOTHING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 124.29 309718 5/29/2008 122568 FITZGERALD EXCAVATING & TRUCKI 48,022.50 PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 186259 053008 04322.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS STS -322 STORMWATER DREDGING 48,022.50 309719 5/29/2008 101621 FLEX- O -LITE INC. 2,035.83 SAFETY MARKING SPHERES 00001016 186280 90571631 1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 1,750.82 SAFETY MARKING SPHERES 00005288 186281 90571630 1335.6532 PAINT PAVEMENT MARKINGS 3,786.65 309720 5129/2008 105824 FLYING CLOUD ANIMAL HOSPITAL 79.45 K9 EXAM 186427 328933 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 79.45 309721 5/29/2008 101475 FOOTJOY 1,082.53- SHOE REBATE 180716 6705867 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5,357.50- SHOE CREDIT 180717 6725922 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF Fu1NA .5 /2b,_ -.d 8:33:51 Council Check Register Page - 9 5/29/2008 --5/29/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 6,476.12 GOLF GLOVES 186613 4969691 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,240.54 SHOES 186614 4994427 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,276.63 309722 5/29/2008 103207 FORESTRY SUPPLIERS INC. 575.00 WEATHER STATION 00006195 186215 597580 -00 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 575.00 309723 5/29/2008 101022 FRAME, SUSAN 750.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 186466 052208 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 750.00 309724 5/29/2008 103039 FREY, MICHAEL 3,270.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 186467 052208 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 3,270.00 309725 5/29/2008 102456 GALLS INC. 207.90 POLO SHIRTS 186428 5940738401019 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 207.90 309726 5/2912008 101867 GETSINGER, DONNA 384.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 186468 052208 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 384.00 309727 5/29/2008 122583 GHIZONI, DAVE 454.50 OFFICIATING FEES 186597 052308 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 454.50 309728 5/29/2008 104652 GILLIS, LOUISE 420.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 186469 052208 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 420.00 309729 5/29/2008 119936 GLOBAL OAK 450.00 E- COMMERCE 186429 520 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL ADMINISTRATION 1,087.50 WEBSITE MAINTENANCE 186429 520 2210.6124 WEB DEVELOPMENT COMMUNICATIONS 1,537.50 309730 5/29/2008 104775 GOVERNMENT TRAINING SERVICES 235.00 MCMA CONFERENCE REGISTRATIC99013707 186261 13707 1120.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ADMINISTRATION 235.00 309731 5/2912008 101103 GRAINGER R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/28/2008 8:33:51 Council Check Register Page - 10 5/29/2008 --5/29/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 70.13 RECEPTACLE COVERS 00006185 186216 9629534596 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 383.77 TOILET REPAIR KITS, EAR MUFFS 00006197 186217 9632162781 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 130.08 RECEPTACLES 00006196 186218 9631405892 5420.6530 REPAIR PARTS CLUB HOUSE 29.33 ORGANIZER 00001085 186282 9637883233 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 176.41 MEASURING WHEEL, PAINT 00001114 186283 9639993071 5913.6556 TOOLS DISTRIBUTION 108.37 LABEL TAPE, BATTERIES 00001085 186284 9637672362 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 71.56 CUT OFF WHEELS, CLAMP 00001006 186555 9642563911 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 60.22 CUT OFF WHEELS, PLIERS 00001006 186556 9642016977 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 147.43 BATTERIES 186557 9638479684 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 16.85 LED UPGRADE KIT 186558 9638824012 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 20.65 SAFETY EYEWEAR 186559 9632538444 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 258.09 SAFETY EYEWEAR 186560 9633548160 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 30.97 SAFETY EYEWEAR 186561 9633548152 7412.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF RANGE 35.94 HOSE 00002152 186615 9631405876 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 102.18 THERMOMETER 00002152 186616 9631405884 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 1,641.98 309732 5/29/2008 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 171.90 186492 100520 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 671.80 186493 100633 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 405.85 186494 100634 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 1,249.55 309733 5/29/2008 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 549.14 LIGHTING 00005022 186219 933864682 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 136.24 GROUND RODS, INDUSTRIAL TAPE 00001034 186220 933923607 1322.6530 REPAIR PARTS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 131.40 OUTDOOR VINYL 00001100 186562 934016171 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 117.55 WIRE 00001095 186563 934008158 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 93.49 VOLUME CONTROL UNITS 00001095 186564 934008157 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 71.26 CORD & CABLE 00001100 186565 934016172 1322.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 1,099.08 309734 5/29/2008 100785 GREUPNER, JOE 4,122.00 GOLF LESSONS 186617 052308 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 4,122.00 309735 . 5/29/2008 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 782.33 186316 56192 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 91.70 186317 56184 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 108.10- 186318 751600 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 120.72 186380 56193 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 6,134.85 186381 56194 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF -.-4A 5/28- 8:33:51 Council Check Register Page - 11 5/29/2008 -- 5/29/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 6,890.82 186495 56183 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 3,247.94 186496 56182 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,215.75 186497 56092 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 172.69 186498 56189 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 104.24 186499 56188 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,527.12 186500 56187 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 740.48- 186501 752156 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 16.00- 186641 752265 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 19,423.58 309736 5/29/2008 121379 GRIMES, JUDITH 729.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 186470 052208 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 729.00 309737 5/29/2008 104482 GUNNAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 2,500.00 REPLACE LIGHT POLES 00001104 186221 8- 4 -31 -1 1322.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 2,500.00 309738 5/29/2008 102320 HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 123.44 REGISTER TAPE 00007512 186360 259444 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 123.44 309739 5/29/2008 100797 HAWKINS INC. 3,204.50 CHEMICALS 00005755 186566 1185728 5915.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES WATER TREATMENT 3,204.50 309740 5/29/2008 106062 HAYNES, STEPHEN 18.00 SUPPLIES 186471 052208 5125.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 225.00 INSTRUCTOR 186471 052208 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 243.00 309741 5/29/2008 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 205.44 MEAT PATTIES 186361 021042 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 205.44 309742 5/29/2008 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 177.84 MOPS 00002155 186618 2488479 5620.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 177.84 309743 5/29/2008 100805 HIRSHFIELD'S 81.29 PAINT 186619 003289148 5620.6532 PAINT EDINBOROUGH PARK 81.29 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/28/2008 8:33:51 Council Check Register Page - 12 5129/2008 -5/29/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 309744 5/29/2008 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 689.36 186382 452819 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 51.90 186383 452820 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,012.50 186502 452896 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 716.45 186642 452893 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,470.21 309745 5/29/2008 105461 HOLL, SHELLEY 561.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 186472 052208 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 561.00 309746 5/29/2008 122567 HORAN, CAROL 57.82 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT 186222 051908 1470.4329 AMBULANCE FEES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 57.82 309747 5/29/2008 102114 HUEBSCH 57.98 RUG CLEANING 186620 2155907,2169616 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH PARK 57.98 309748 5/29/2008 119094 HUMANA DENTAL 517.83 PREMIUM 186567 861150732 1550.6043 COBRA INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 8,035.46 PREMIUM 186567 861150732 1550.6040 HOSPITALIZATION CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 8,553.29 309749 5/29/2008 122565 HYSER, TIMOTHY 353.50 OFFICIATING FEES 186595 052308 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 353.50 309750 5/29/2008 119808 INTEGRA TELECOM 276.95 PHONE 186568 3760110 7411.6188 TELEPHONE PSTF OCCUPANCY 276.95 309751 5/29/2008 118322 ITL PATCH COMPANY INC. 731.12 SHOULDER EMBLEMS 186430 29013 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 731.12 309752 5/29/2008 118275 J.P. COOKE CO., THE 38.80 NOTARY STAMP 186431 662376 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 38.80 309753 5/29/20ng 102136 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SERVICE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EuiNA 5 /28hewd 8:33:51 Council Check Register Page - 13 5/29/2008 -- 5/29/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 286.78 BEZEL, AIR HORN 263.37 LED LIGHTS 128.06 LED LIGHT 678.21 REPAIR PARTS PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 00005354 186392 0010739 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 00005781 186393 0010935 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 00005781 186394 0010958 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 309754 5/29/2008 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 260.60 186362 905035 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 209.85 186503 1160969 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 16.00 186504 1160962 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 6,820.27 186505 1160961 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 7,604.62 186506 1160976 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 34.50 186507 1160977 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 59.00 186643 1160974 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 6,020.85 186644 1160973 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 21,025.69 309755 5/29/2008 103959 JOHN NAGENGAST DOORS LLC 240.00 REPAIR HANDICAP DOOR 00002326 186223 3326 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES 240.00 309757 5/29/2008 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1,060.70 186508 1444299 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 39.62 186509 1444298 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 402.43 166510 1444297 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,566.84 186511 1444315 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 472.79 186512 1444316 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1,091.99 186513 1444314 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 871.44 186514 1444304 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 825.39 186515 1444313 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,816.55 186516 1444318 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 595.93 186517 1444307 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 553.28 186518 1444303 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,150.48 186645 1444310 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 508.34 186646 1444302 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,187.58 186647 1444308 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 36.11 186648 1444312 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 185.83 186649 1444311 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 322.82 186650 1444309 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 4,122.12 186651 1444305 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 807.74 186652 1440894 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,780.59 186653 1444306 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 464.53 186654 1444300 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5128/2008 8:33:51 Council Check Register Page - 14 5/29/2008 5/29/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 870.77 186655 1444301 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 24,733.87 309758 5/29/2008 103654 JOHNSON, DENISE 684.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 186473 052208 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 684.00 309759 5129/2008 100919 JOHNSON, NAOMI 4.62 PETTY CASH 186487 052108 5110.6235 POSTAGE ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 8.93 PETTY CASH 186487 052108 5125.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 13.32 PETTY CASH 186487 052108 5125.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MEDIA STUDIO 19.25 PETTY CASH 186487 052108 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 35.48 PETTY CASH 186487 052108 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 35.77 PETTY CASH 186487 052108 5111.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 36.24 PETTY CASH 186487 052108 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 44.30 PETTY CASH 186487 052108 5110.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 75.80 PETTY CASH 186487 052108 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 273.71 309760 5/29/2008 102603 JONAS, LENORE 315.00 REIMBURSEMENT 186474 052208 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 315.00 309761 5129/2008 122239 KANDIKO, GEORGIA 195.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 186475 052208 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 195.00 309762 5/29/2008 102080 KATTREH, ANN 207.53 PHOTO FRAMING 186621 052108 5620.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINBOROUGH PARK 207.53 309763 5/29/2008 113212 KENDELL DOORS & HARDWARE INC. 115.84 MORTISE CYLINDER 186395 78767 1550.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 115.84 309764 5/29/2008 122578 KLUSSENDORF, KURT 38.50 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 186486 052208 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 38.50 309765 5/2912008 105887 KOESSLER, JOE 158.00 MARCH 2008 SERVICE 186414 050108 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 158.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF tUINA 5/28i-o8 8:33:51 Council Check Register Page - 15 5/29/2008 5/29/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 309766 5/29/2008 101220 LAND EQUIPMENT INC. 73.52 SWITCH 00002336 186569 181002 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 73.52 309767 5/29/2008 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 185.60 WASHERS, CLAMPS, TY -RAP 00001032 186224 6836772 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 34.25 HOSE CLAMPS 00001033 186570 6831498 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 219.85 309768 5/29/2008 122584 LAZOS TIES 201.00 ART WORK SOLD AT EAC 00009092 186622 390014 5101.4413 ART WORK SOLD ART CENTER REVENUES 201.00 309769 5/2912008 100855 LESCO INC. 175.30 TURF PAINT 186225 73CB6B90 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS. 385.86 FERTILIZER, SOIL 00002086 186396 95AOB95D 5630.6540 FERTILIZER CENTENNIAL LAKES 561.16 309770 5/2912008 100225 LIFEGUARD STORE, THE 845.00 LIFE JACKETS 186226 89254 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 845.00 309771 512912008 100857 LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC. 1,344.96 ACCUMULATOR BUFFER 00005487 186227 00039952 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,344.96 309772 5129/2008 118815 LITWIN, KATHY 180.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 186476 052208 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 180.00 309773 5/29/2008 102204 LOBBY, MACKENZIE 425.00 BROCHURE DESIGN, EDIT WEBSITE 186363 13 5310.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL ADMINISTRATION 425.00 309774 5/29/2008 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 639.86 186319 38531 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,435.30 186656 38362 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,075.16 309775 5129/2008 100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 117.01 FIBER GUARD 00001045 186228 2083656 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/28/2008 8:33:51 Council Check Register Page - 16 5/29/2008 -- 5/29/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 920.25 FLOAT BALL SCREENS AND CAGES00001094 186229 2083705 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1,037.26 309776 5/2912008 114699 MANAGED SERVICES INC. 326.96 CLEANING SUPPLIES 186571 W18151 7411.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 326.96 309777 5/2912008 100868 MARK VII SALES 3,588.90 186320 324867 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 110.80 186321 324868 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 64.50 186322 324869 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 160.85 186364 323130 5430.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 3,298.76 186657 326823 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 3,266.90 186658 323936 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 2,429.00 186659 324283 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 57.60 186660 326577 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,456.22 186661 326576 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 15,433.53 309778 5/2912008 101146 MATRIX TELECOM INC. 201.24 186397 606805085 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 201.24 309779 5/29/2008 100875 MCCAREN DESIGNS INC. 2,343.00 TREE AND INSTALLATION 186623 44001 5620.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS EDINBOROUGH PARK 2,343.00 309780 5/29/2008 101928 MCKENZIE, THOMAS 61.98 UNIFORM PURCHASE 186432 052208 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 102.28 TRAINING EXPENSES 186433 052308 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 164.26 309781 5/29/2008 105603 MEDICINE LAKE TOURS 1,814.50 CITY OF BRIDGES TRIP - 6/05/08 186416 052108 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 1,814.50 309782 5/2912008 101483 MENARDS 264.51 SIDING, HAMMER, PENCILS 00001088 186230 31791 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET RENOVATION 72.33 OAK BOARDS 00001086 186231 31731 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 420.05 TENSION BARS, PRUNERS 00005845 186285 32312 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 46.69 PAINT SUPPLIES 00008039 186286 30146 5511.6532 PAINT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 5.29 FENCING 00006038 186365 32357 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CLUB HOUSE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF ­AA 5 /2b, - -.,a 8:33:51 Council Check Register Page - 17 5/29/2008 5/29/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 101.31 LIQUID FENCE, HOSE 00006234 186624 33087 5422.6275 COURSE BEAUTIFICATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 910.18 309783 5/29/2008 101987 MENARDS 160.13 CLAMPS, LINKS, TAPE 00002335 186398 89972 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 32.88 TOOL BOX, PESTICIDE 00002319 186399 90325 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 36.43 COMPOST, WEED SPRAY 00002335 186400 90826 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 67.78 WEED SPRAY, SPRAYER, GLOVES 00002333 186401 91637 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 110.22 SOIL 00002164 186625 92692 5620.6540 FERTILIZER EDINBOROUGH PARK 407.44 309784 5/29/2008 102281 MENARDS 18.57 OAK VENEER 00001159 186572 52261 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 18.57 309785 5/29/2008 100882 MERIT SUPPLY 198.24 DEGREASER 00001106 186232 74024 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 318.44 SCRUB BRUSH 00001089 186233 74022 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 263.06 WYPALLS, LINERS 00001079 186234 74021 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 377.73 SOAP, PADS, CLEANER 00001105 186287 74025 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 299.70 GRILL CLEANER, WINDEX 00006338 186366 74033 5421.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES GRILL 1,457.17 309786 5/29/2008 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME 825.00 PERMIT #0984 00005698 186573 0000873268 5915.6260 LICENSES & PERMITS WATER TREATMENT 825.00 309787 5/29/2008 100891 MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 1,655.49 ASPHALT 00005748 186288 92123MB 1301.6518 BLACKTOP GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,655.49 309788 5/29/2008 101161 MIDWEST CHEMICAL SUPPLY 622.20 186257 25569 1551.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 1,603.19 186257 25569 1551.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,225.39 309789 5/29/2008 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 130.50 186323 0118061420 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 218.80 186324 0198087027 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 536.40 186325 0158565015 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 422.90 186662 0198087503 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 1,308.60 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 309791 5/2912008 5/29/2008 --5/29/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 309790 5/29/2008 103186 MIDWEST FUELS 186626 12011 1,020.00 GASOLINE 00006463 186235 47056 5422.6581 GASOLINE 647.87 DIESEL FUEL 00005252 186236 47057 5422.6581 GASOLINE COST OF GOODS SOLD CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 5128/2008 8:33:51 Page - 18 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EDINBOROUGH PARK DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION , FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE TOOLS GENERAL MAINTE! " 1,667.87 309791 5/2912008 119738 MIDWEST MINIMELTS 656.25 ICE CREAM 186626 12011 5620.5510 656.25 309792 5/29/2008 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,760.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 00005696 186574 33147 5913.6180 880.00 CURB STOP REPAIR 00005697 186575 33148 5913.6180 2,640.00 309793 5129/2008 100522 MINNESOTA AIR INC. 83.07 SENSORS 00001078 186237 2099701 -00 5860.6406 88.73 SENSOR LOCKOUTS 00001091 186576 2099772 -00 5913.6530 171.80 309794 5/29/2008 120051 MINNESOTA FIRE CHIEF MAGAZINE 45.00 SUBSCRIPTIONS 186434 84 1470.6105 45.00 309795 5129/2008 106193 MINNESOTA HIGHWAY SAFETY AND 7,184.00 PROGRAMS TUITION 186437 5 /9 108STMT 1400.6104 7,184.00 309796 5129/2008 100066 MINNESOTA MAILING SOLUTIONS 186.38 RATE INCREASE - POSTAL 186435 51744 1400.6235 186.38 309797 5/29/2008 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT 337.45 HYD VALVE SEATS 00001171 186577 0222914 5913.6530 337.45 309798 512912008 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 931.88 ASPHALT EMULSION 00005753 186238 57051 1301.6519 931.88 309799 5/29/2008 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 18.55 NOZZLES 00001108 186289 0076507 -IN 1301.6556 COST OF GOODS SOLD CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 5128/2008 8:33:51 Page - 18 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EDINBOROUGH PARK DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION , FIRE DEPT. GENERAL CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POSTAGE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE TOOLS GENERAL MAINTE! " R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF -- JA 512t.- .a 8:33:51 Council Check Register Page - 19 5/29/2008 --5/29/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 127.64 HUDSON SPRAYERS 00005846 186290 0076469 -IN 1643.6556 TOOLS GENERAL TURF CARE 146.19 309800 5/29/2008 103246 MOIR, BILL 300.00 AQUATIC CENTER OPENING CASH 186367 052008 5300.1040 CHANGE FUND AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 700.00 AQUATIC CENTER OPENING CASH 186367 052008 5300.1030 PETTY CASH AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 1,000.00 309801 5129/2008 108537 MOORE, JOEL 244.92 UNIFORM PURCHASE 186436 051308 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 244.92 309802 5/29/2008' 106151 MOOS, BEVERLY 150.09 MAAO SEMINAR EXPENSE 186627 052308 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 150.09 309803 5/29/2008 102395 MOSE, WILLIAM 530.25 OFFICIATING FEES 186598 052308 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 530.25 309804 5129/2008 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 334.51 GATE VALVES, HOSE 00006227 186239 615751 -00 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 63.18 HUBS 00006225 186240 615280 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 356.98 IRRIGATION PARTS 00002330 186578 618394 -00 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 55.04 V -BELT 00005808 186579 617520 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 809.71 309805 5/29/2008 100916 MUZAK 207.54 MUSIC SERVICES 186402 A195681 5630.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES 207.54 309806 5/29/2008 106334 NELSON, PEGGY 100.00 INSTRUCTOR 186477 052208 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 100.00 309807 5/29/2008 108678 NEWMECH COMPANIES INC. 371.00 AIR DAMPER REPAIR 186580 385857 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 371.00 309808 5/29/2008 101958 NICOL, JANET 425.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 186478 052208 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 425.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 504.00 INSTRUCTOR AC CITY OF EDINA 052208 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION Council Check Register 5/29/2008 --5/29/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 309809 5/29/2008 186241 122575 NORTH STAR WOMEN'S FIREFIGHTER 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 300.00 2008 SPONSORSHIP 186438 200810. 1470.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 309814 300.00 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 309810 512912008 100933 NORTHWEST GRAPHIC SUPPLY HVAC SERVICE CONTRACT 186403 21808 5630.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT 389.70 POTTERY TOOL KITS 00009339 186368 35820601 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 12.50 ART SUPPLIES 186369 35766401 5120.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 12.41 CRAFT SUPPLIES 00009039 186581 35857700 5110.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES INSTRUCTOR AC 186480 414.61 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 309811 5/29/2008 186480 116480 NSITE MYSTERY SHOPPING 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY 108.99 SECRET SHOPPING 186628 1828 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 309816 110.00 SECRET SHOPPING 186628 1828 5862.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 110.00 SECRET SHOPPING 186628 1828 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1122.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 328.99 897.00 309812 5/2912008 100729 ODLAND, DOROTHY 309817 5/29/2008 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 5128/2008 8:33:51 Page - 20 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 504.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 186479 052208 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 504.00 309813 5129/2008 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 72.92 GRIPS, CUTTERS 00001101 186241 501848 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 72.92 309814 5/29/2008 100940 OWENS COMPANIES INC. 697.00 HVAC SERVICE CONTRACT 186403 21808 5630.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CENTENNIAL LAKES 697.00 309815 5/29/2008 102440 PASS, GRACE 414.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 186480 052208 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 644.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 186480 052208 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY 1,058.00 309816 5/29/2008 122573 PATERLINI, GERMANA 897.00 ICLEI REGISTRATION 186404 051908 1122.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM 897.00 309817 5/29/2008 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 834.31 186326 8185238 -IN 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 958.00 186519 8185326 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,587.00 186520 8185325 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 309818 5/29/2008 POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 119219 PC /NAMETAG COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 23.65 LAMINATION POUCHES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 5822.5515 23.65 50TH ST SELLING 309819 5/29/2008 50TH ST SELLING ' 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 473.28 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5842.5513 473.28 YORK SELLING 309820 5/29/2008 YORK SELLING 121222 PERTL, LISA COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 36.00 PROGRAM REFUND 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5512 36.00 50TH ST SELLING 309821 5/29/2008 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS 3,314.47 5,662.78 2,161.82 49.12 864.11 45.07 49.12 4,222.77 2,800.33 275.43 CITY OF __.AA 5/2b,__ _e 8:33:51 Council Check Register Page - 21 5129/2008 -- 5129/2008 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 186521 8185501 -IN 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 186521 8185501 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 186439 15219551 186405 03803590 186260 052008 186522 2610424 186523 2610425 186524 2610426 186525 2610416 186526 2610415 186663 2610423 186664 2610420 186665 2610422 186666 2610419 186667 2610421 186668 2610418 186669 2610417 309822 5/29/2008 100953 PHYSIO- CONTROL INC. 246.70 LIFEPAK BATTERY 00003664 186440 PH389922 246.70 309823 5/29/2008 120959 PLOURDE PROPERTIES LLC 5,070.00 LEASE PAYMENT 186242 052608 5,070.00 309824 5/29/2008 111340 POLAR CHEVROLET 16,965.20 SILVERADO PICKUP TRUCK 00005261 186582 8Z265755 16,965.20 r 1400.4128 SOLICITOR PERMITS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 1600.4390.16 ADAPTIVE SWIMMING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING ' 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 5900.1735 AUTOMOBILES & TRUCKS UTILITY BALANCE SHEET R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/28/2008 8:33:51 Council Check Register Page - 22 512912008 --5/29/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 309825 5129/2008 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS 565.00 BRM ACCOUNTING PERMIT #6171002 186370 MAY122008 1550.6235 POSTAGE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 565.00 309826 5/29/2008 121436 POWER/MATION 300.00 LOOPS 00001096 186583 2057114 -00 5923.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COLLECTION SYSTEMS 300.00 309827 512912008 122061 PRESTIGE BUILDERS OF MINNESOTA 495.00 CHANGE ORDER 94 00005983 186536 04 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 190.00 CHANGE ORDER #6 00005981 186537 06 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,496.00 CHANGE ORDER #7 00005996 186538 07 - 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,145.00 CHANGE ORDER #8 00005995 186539 08 1646.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 4,326.00 309828 5/29/2008 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 587.75 186327 56190 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 946.08 186328 56185 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 55.84 186527 56180 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 479.85 186528 57733 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,069.52 309829 5129/2008 111600 PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER INC. 123.82 EVIDENCE TESTS 186441 145300IN 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 123.82 309830 5/29/2008 100971 QUALITY WINE 5,379.32 186329 013038 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING ' 97.00 186330 013014 -00 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 564.30 186331 012995 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 912.81 186332 012736 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 316.00 186333 011665 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 6.00 186334 009055 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,381.40 186335 012996 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 666.40 186336 012737 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 388.80 186337 013085 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,555.11 186338 013040 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 235.20 186339 012738 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 427.10 186340 012354 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 3,214.18 186529 013039 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 98.34- 186530 011813 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF tL iNA HITCH, PINTLE SHANK 00001047 186407 1426626 -01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS Council Check Register 116.02 5/29/2008 -- 5/29/2008 Check # Dale Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 16,045.28 309831 5/2912008 PERFORMANCE 6/05/08 101965 QWEST 052108 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 104.40 952 451 -6058 186442 6058 -5/08 1400.6188 TELEPHONE 104.40 309838 309832 5/29/2008 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 100972 R&R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN 1 380.92 ZAMBONI REPAIRS 00008045 186291 0040179 -IN 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 186629 052308 380.92 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 309833 5/29/2008 119755 RICCI, PATRICE 5128i—d 8:33:51 Page - 23 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ARENA ICE MAINT 139.50 OFFICIATING FEES 186594 052308 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 139.50 309834 5129/2008 100977 RICHFIELD PLUMBING COMPANY 100.00 SINK REPAIR 00006339 186371 49521 5421.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS GRILL 384.20 INSTALLED NEW DRAIN 186406 49522 1550.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 484.20 309835 5/29/2008 108659 RICHTER, BRIAN 100.00 PERFORMANCE 6104/08 186266 052108 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 100.00 309836 5/29/2008 102408 RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED 116.02 HITCH, PINTLE SHANK 00001047 186407 1426626 -01 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 116.02 309837 5/29/2008 116393 ROGERS, RUSS 200.00 PERFORMANCE 6/05/08 186267 052108 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 200.00 309838 5/2912008 101822 SAM'S CLUB DIRECT 36.81 101- 26373069350 186629 052308 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 36.81 309839 5/29/2008 119774 SAMS, WADE 215.00 IRRIGATION STARTUP 00002159 186630 193948 5620.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EDINBOROUGH PARK 215.00 309840 5/29/2008 118168 SANSIO 1,051.78 EMS SUBSCRIPTION 186443 INV009841 1470.6160 DATA PROCESSING FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 1,051.78 R55CKREG LOG20000 101.00 OFFICIATING FEES CITY OF EDINA 052308 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION Council Check Register 101.00 5/2912008 -- 5/29/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 309841 5129/2008 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 59.90 464.60 LUMBER 00001005 186408 40626433 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 224.70 STAKES, NAILS 00001035 186409 40628084 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 28.50 LUMBER 00001111 186410 40630325 1314.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 717.80 USA 309842 5/29/2008 119799 SCHIMETZ, SCOTT 367.50 ALARM SYSTEM REPAIRS 00002327 186243 5/28/2008 8:33:51 Page - 24 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION 101.00 OFFICIATING FEES 186592 052308 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 101.00 309843 5129/2008 105514 SCHIRO, DOUG 59.90 UNIFORM PURCHASE 186584 052208 1646.6201 LAUNDRY BUILDING MAINTENANCE 59.90 309844 5/29/2008 102949 SECURITAS SECURITY SYSTEMS USA 367.50 ALARM SYSTEM REPAIRS 00002327 186243 SV0017345 5630.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS CENTENNIAL LAKES 367.50 309845 5/29/2008 101862 SEVEN CORNERS HARDWARE INC. 164.97 TROWEL, FLOATS, LEVEL 00001178 186292 120311 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 164.97 309846 5/29/2008 103249 SHANNON, JIM 130.00 PERFORMANCE 6/03/08 186264 052108 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 130.00 309847 5/29/2008 101380 SHAUGHNESSY, SANDRA 1,368.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 186481 052208 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 1,528.00 POTTERY MAINTENANCE 186481 052208 5112.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER POTTERY 2,896.00 309848 5/29/2008 100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 340.51 PAINTING TOOLS 00005285 186244 1807 -0 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 218.12 PAINT 00008042 186293 1845 -0 5511.6532 PAINT . ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 558.63 309849 5/2912008 120292 SIGNATURE CONCEPTS 88.59 CONCESSION CAPS 186372 252633 5320.6201 LAUNDRY POOL CONCESSIONS 88.59 309850 5/2919- 117819 SOUTH OF THE RIVER COMMUNITY B a � R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF -NA Council Check Register 5/29/2008 - 5/29/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No - Account No Subledger Account Description 50.00 PERFORMANCE 6/01/08 186262 052108 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5/28i-d 8:33:51 Pegg - 25 Business Unit ED ADMINISTRATION GRILL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION DISTRIBUTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL CONCESSIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PSTF RANGE 50.00 309851 5/29/2008 102935 SOUTH TOWN REFRIGERATION INC 158.00 ICE MACHINE REPAIR 00006340 186373 67348 5421.6180 158.00 309852 5/29/2008 103273 SOUTHSIDE BIG BAND 150.00 PERFORMANCE 6/02/08 186263 052108 5610.6136 150.00 309853 5/29/2008 101023 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMI 2,458.87 3RD QUARTER 186374 200812 2210.6136 2,458.87 309854 5/29/2008 110977 SOW, ADAMA 315.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 186482 052208 5110.6103 980.00 CLEANING SERVICES 186482 052208 5111.6103 1,295.00 309855 5/29/2008 101004 SPS COMPANIES 67.79 PLUMBING SUPPLIES 00008043 186294 S1846937.001 5511.6406 140.97 REPAIR KITS 00005819 186375 S1839733.001 5311.6530 8.81 REPAIR KIT 00005819 186376 S1839723.002 5311.6530 754.60 COPPER TUBING 00001018 186585 S1845834.002 5913.6530 972.17 309856 5/2912008 106452 STONE, HOLLY 720.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 186483 052208 5110.6103 720.00 309857 5/29/2008 106030 STRATEGIC EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY C 3,875.41 FREEZER 00007026 186245 1289839 5320.6406 3,875.41 309858 5/29/2008 101015 STREICHERS 532.50 TRAINING AMMO 186444 1520091 1400.6104 88.39 INSTALL SQUAD EQUIPMENT 186445 1516645 1400.6215 53.24 VEHICLE ANTENNA 186446 1516640 1400.6215 119.97 UNIFORM PURCHASE 186447 1518168 1400.6203 54.28 SOLVENT 186586 1518654 7412.6406 848.38 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 5/28i-d 8:33:51 Pegg - 25 Business Unit ED ADMINISTRATION GRILL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COMMUNICATIONS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS REPAIR PARTS ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS POOL OPERATION POOL OPERATION DISTRIBUTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION GENERAL SUPPLIES CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL CONCESSIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PSTF RANGE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/28/2008 8:33:51 Council Check Register Page - 26 5/29/2008 -- 5/29/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 309859 5/29/2008 106417 STRUNK'S 2,152.68 FLOWERS 00002332 186411 927717 5630.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES 2,152.68 309860 5/29/2008 100593 SULLIVAN, JOSEPH F 305.85 ABOUT TOWN ARTICLE 186448 305 2210.6123 MAGAZINE /NEWSLETTER EXPENSE COMMUNICATIONS 305.85 309861 5/29/2008 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS 28.60 PUBLISH NOTICE 00014798 186246 1091698 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 150.15 PUBLISH ORD 2008 -02 00014798 186247 1093686 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 39.33 PUBLISH ORD 2008 -03 00014798 186248 1093687 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 28.60 PUBLISH NOTICE 00014798 186249 1093688 1120.6120 ADVERTISING LEGAL ADMINISTRATION 246.68 - 309862 5/29/2008 122576 SUPERIOR POLICE DEPARTMENT 70.00 COMPETITION REGISTRATION 186449 052108 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 70.00 309863 5/29/2008 110674 SUPERIOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATIO 17.69 PHONE HOLSTER 00001174 186587 21177 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 59.29 CHARGER, CLIP /CASE 00001191 186588 21219 1301.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL. MAINTENANCE 76.98 309864 5129/2008 101027 TARGET 45.93 9- 555- 029 -840 186631 051808 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 45.93 309865 5/29/2008 116920 TARGET COMMERCIAL INTERIORS 142.71 DESK ACCESSORIES 00002105 186632 526130 5610.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION 100.11 PENCIL DRAWER 186633 525992 5610.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION 242.82 309866 5/29/2008 104932 TAYLOR MADE 5.44 SHIPPING CHARGES 00006416 186377 10525382 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 5.44 309867 5/29/2008 117686 TECHNAGRAPHICS 322.19 PROPERTY INVENTORY FORMS 186450 7491011 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 322.19 • 1155CKREG LOG20000 CITY O _,NA Council Check Register 5/29/2008 --5129/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 309868 5/29/2008 101029 TESSMAN SEED CO. 77.75 LABELS FOR RAKES 00006221 186250 S094438 -IN 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 77.75 309869 5/2912008 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 5/20,_ -�8 8:33:51 Page - 27 Business Unit MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,825.80 186670 493461 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 132.90 186671 493035 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 10,034.10 186671 493035 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 48.90 186672 493036 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING PLAYGROUND & THEATER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 94.00 186341 205997 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 309874 5/29/2008 100682 TRUGREEN- CHEMLAWN 13,041.70 105.00 WEED CONTROL 309870 5129/2008 1643.6103 120700 TIGER OAK PUBLICATIONS INC. 105.00 500.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 186634 2008 -15192 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 15.08 GASKET 500.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 186634 2008 -15192 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 00006220 186252 0114237 500.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 186634 2008 -15192 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,500.00 309871 5/29/2008 103331 TILSNER, DONNA 945.19 SEED MIXTURE 00006198 186254 18653 160.18 PLAYGROUND SUPPLIES 186635 052308 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 160.18 309872 5129/2008 116302 TRI - ANIM HEALTH SERVICES INC 18.32 AMBULANCE SUPPLIES 00003604 186451 MMH81294489 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES 18.32 309873 5/29/2008 101048 TRI COUNTY BEVERAGE & SUPPLY 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING PLAYGROUND & THEATER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 94.00 186341 205997 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 309874 5/29/2008 100682 TRUGREEN- CHEMLAWN 105.00 WEED CONTROL 00005997 186295 581859 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 105.00 309875 5/29/2008 118190 TURFWERKS LLC 15.08 GASKET 00006226 186251 J101032 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 569.14 CLUTCH, DISK, BELT 00006220 186252 0114237 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 342.71 BEARINGS, BUSHINGS 00006209 186253 S113633 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 926.93 309876 5129/2008 102150 TWIN CITY SEED CO. 945.19 SEED MIXTURE 00006198 186254 18653 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 945.19 GENERAL TURF CARE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 5/2812008 8:33:51 Council Check Register Page - 28 5/29/2008 5/29/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 309877 5/29/2008 122221 UNITED RENTALS NORTHWEST INC. 1,248.60 LIFT REPAIRS 00005913 186255 73225825 -001 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1,248.60 309878 5/29/2008 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. 55.52 PAGERS 186452 R6339611E 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 55.52 309879 5/29/2008 122554 VALLEY NATIONAL GASES LLC 203.40 OXYGEN 00003649 186453 165954 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 209.45 OXYGEN 00003649 186454 186167 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 412.85 309880 5/29/2008 120620 VALLONE, AMANDA 140.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 186484 052208 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 140.00 309881 5/29/2008 106308 VEITH, MICHELLE 15.00 _ PROGRAM REFUND 186378 052108 1600.4390.15 GEN ADAPTIVE REC PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 15.00 309882 5/29/2008 101061 VICTORY CORPS 280.34 USA FLAGS 186589 56150 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 280.34 309883 5/2912008 122514 VINO SOURCE, THE 270.00 186673 23184 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 270.00 309884 5/29/2008 121042 WALLACE CARLSON PRINTING 276.68 POSTCARDS 00009343 186379 18346 5110.6575 PRINTING ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 276.68 309885 5/29/2008 113961 WATSON FURNITURE GROUP INC. 104.37 KNEE GUARD KITS 00003142 186455 30306 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 104.37 309886 5/29/2008 105440 WEIGLE, SUE 5.00 PETTY CASH 186418 051908 1628.6103.02 GOLF PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 15.00 PETTY CASH 186418 051908 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 82.00 PETTY CASH 186418 051908 1628.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS E R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation Council Check Register 98.00 PETTY CASH 5/29/2008 200.00 309887 5/29/2008 Inv No 122242 WILLIAMS, SYLVIA Subledger Account Description Business Unit 648.00 INSTRUCTOR AC 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 648.00 186485 309888 5/29/2008 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 114588 WILSON, ROBERT C. 186590 052308 106.76 MAAO SUMMER SEMINARS ASSESSING 186591 319.00 IAAO CONFERENCE AIRFARE CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 425.76. 193617 -00 309889 5/29/2008 50TH ST SELLING 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 193618 -00 5642.5513 976.95 YORK SELLING 186531 193701 -00 397.75 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 186343 760.05 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,134.75 35974 309890 5/2912008 50TH ST SELLING 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 232002 5822.5513 543.10 50TH ST SELLING 186533 232004 173.16- COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 186534 867.58 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,954.37 051908 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,100.59 186345 211769 5822.5513 4,292.48 50TH ST SELLING 309891 5/29/2008 5842.5513 122577 WOODBURY BULLETIN YORK SELLING 186535 2.85 MAY 7TH EDITION COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2.85 153521340 309892 5129/2008 TRAFFIC SIGNALS 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC Payment Instrument Totals 486.00 414.00 558.00 1,458.00 309893 5/29/2008 101726 XCEL ENERGY 34.90 51- 5276505 -8 34.90 442,486.16 Grand Total CITY OF - -.,iqA 5/2b,__, d 8:33:51 Council Check Register Page - 29 5/29/2008 5/2912008 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 186418 051908 1628.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES SENIOR CITIZENS 186485 052208 5110.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 186590 052308 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 186591 MAY2308 1190.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING 186342 193617 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 186384 193618 -00 5642.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 186531 193701 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 186343 231408 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 186344 35974 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 186532 232002 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 186533 232004 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 186534 232003 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 186456 051908 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 186345 211769 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 186385 211770 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 186535 211768 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 186256 153521340 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS Payment Instrument Totals R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register i 5/29/2008 --5/29/2008 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Check Total Total Payments Subledger Account Description 442,486.16 Business Unit 5/28/2008 8:33:51 Page - 30 R55CKSUM LOG20000 CITY OF _ .. +A Council Check Summary 5/29/2008 - 5/29/2008 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 99,147.15 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 3,855.07 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 7,371.01 05100 ART CENTER FUND 21,462.53 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 7,363.26 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 14,166.09 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 713.52 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 16,626.29 05800 LIQUOR FUND 176,733.72 05900 UTILITY FUND 43,760.35 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 48,022.50 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 3,264.67 Report Totals 442,486.16 We Con" to the best of ourkrvabdge and belief, that these claims comply In all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing poll es so proced a 5/2t. 8:35:19 Page - 1 r e REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item VII. From: Debra Mangen Consent ❑ City Clerk Information Only Date: June 3, 2008 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Correspondence Received Since Last Council Meeting Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance 0 Discussion Info /Background: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received since the last Council meeting. From: Ray Hall <raynkayn @earthlink.neb Subject: Morningside water mainlining project @ 06.03.08 council mtg Date: June 3, 2008 2:44:41 PM CDT To: edinamail @cityofedina.com Cc: larrystotts<paddygumpy@comoast.net>,edina.morningside@gmaii.com Ref 1: email, Morningside Neighborhood Ass'n to Momingside Neighbors, 06.02.08 Ref 2: email, T. Bizily to Edina City Council, no date available Councilors: Hovland Housh Masica Bennett Swenson T SEAL JUN 0 3 2009 RECEIVED Ref 1 email, states, in part, "...residents will not be able to comment on this issue at Tuesday's meeting...." Hence, residents are left with the further depersonalization of discourse by sending email or telecons to question decisions or to request real information. Safety Dr. Bizily, in her email to the Council, expresses her concerns about the safety of components in the proposed plastic liner from the likely contractor, who has apparently declined to share this "proprietary" information with our fair city. We submit that public safety !6 the Council's business, and urge you to disqualify &U contractor who fails to openly disclose AU potable water safety data, including, but necessarily limited to, the April 2008 statement from the National Toxicology Program. (The liners in question will, we assume, be in place for a jQp,g time.) Assume this is a draft report (included in Ref. 1 email), since it's a bit tough to decipher. The Task What's the rationale for moving from a locally verifiable technique (concrete lining used by City of Minneapolis) to a plastic liner ? What verifiable water safety responses do we have from bidders ? Does the city's bid package contain a lifetime warrantee requirement, and what penalties accrue in event of failure to comply ? ' The Cost Staff Report cites a Capital Improvement Plan Item of $480,000 for concrete liner (amended to $ 700,000, with no explanation). From Ref 1 email, "... initial phase of project is estimated to cost $ 1,238,974..." (Assume other bids are higher.) How is this cost differential justified without explanation ? " The Payment Who, specifically, is to pay ? What's city policy for payment of water main repairs ? Do non - Morningsiders' rates increase when mains are repaired ? Ray and Kathleen Hall 4230 Grimes Ave. S. Edina MN 55416 952- 926 -9965 Susan Heiberg From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 3:32 PM Cc: Susan Heiberg Subject: FW: council members & mayor - Interlachen Bike Trail From: terry johnson [mailto:ccb952 @msn.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 12:58 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: council members & mayor - Interlachen Bike Trail SEAL -' JUN 0 3 7nnq Page 1 of 1 I support bike lanes on Interlachen Blvd by keeping the roads current width and narrowing the lanes slightly to accomodate a 4 -6' bike lane on both sides. The devestation and the "clear cut" look of Interlachen Blvd if widened is not an option just because money may be available. We should follow the above which the Edina Bike Task Force wants and recommends. Sincerely, Terry L Johnson 2 Orchard Lane Edina, MN, 55436 952 - 925 -0697 It's easy to add contacts from Facebook and other social sites through Windows Live TM Messenger. Learn How. 6/3/2008 F SEAL JUN 0 3 7009 FiECEIVEp I understand that one of the agenda items at tonight's City Council meeting is the proposed award of a bid for work on the above project. Unfortunately, I was unable to attend the meeting in March, but, as a Morningside resident, I plan to attend tonight's meeting and I would appreciate it if the Mayor and City Council would discuss the following issues at tonight's meeting prior to voting on the bid: 1. I understand from our neighborhood association that the cost of the project is over $1.2 million and that this cost will likely result in higher water bills for Morningside residents. Do Morningside residents already pay an increased rate for our Minneapolis water, and does that increased rate already contemplate costs for repairs; maintenance, etc.? 2. What is the nature of the plastic material that I understand will be used by the low bidder to reline our pipes? Is there any safety information on this particular polyethylene material? If so, has the council obtained and reviewed this information? What is your opinion of the safety of the material for use as a conduit for drinking water? What is the projected lifespan of the repair work that has been proposed? I would appreciate these questions being circulated to the Mayor and City Council members. Thank you. - - Jim Mewborn 4004 Kipling Ave. Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council Members, AZ-G SEAL'il JUN 0 3 7009 RECEIVED We are writing to concur with the concerns raised in Dr. Tara Bizily's email to you regarding N safety data and costs associated with the Morningside Water Main Lining Project. We have been actively involved with this process and attended the informational meeting with regard to proposed lining to remedy current water problems. We inquired and were directed to the Dept of Health as to the safety of the vendors products and were told that information must come from them. We conveyed this to Dr. Bizily and had been informed she was making inquires on behalf of the residents. We only learned last night that your staff will make a recommendation to you on the vendor this evening. We have only to speculate that the lack of willingness on behalf of Insituform (maker of Thermopipe) to address the questions of Dr. Bizily should be a big red flag to put you on notice that perhaps there is something they are not willing to share. Furthermore, if they are not responsive or forthcoming now, how can we expect that in the future with questions that issues that may arise in the process of the re- lining project? This diminishes trust in the process! Cost is also of major concern. We were present and heard Mr. Houle say that he did not anticipate there would be an assessment to residents of Morningside for this project. Once again we concur with Dr. Bizily that the semantics of what your may refer to as an "assessment' versus a "rate increase" amounts to the same thing. We would ask that you consider once again the more financially feasible option of cleaning the pipes and fully replacing them during street reconstruction. Many of us have already made a substantial investment in the installment of a filter for our drinking water, not to mention the additional water that uses to provide safe drinking water. In addition, we already pay more for the clouded and stain producing water that has it's source in Minneapolis. Finally, we are really surprised and concerned that your staff, who you consistently claim are willing to work with the residents at every turn, would act to put this on your agenda without notice to it's residents. In doing so, they not only prevent the residents from notice of their decision AND the opportunity to verbally address the decision they have reached, but they have breached the trust that we have been trying to build by working through this process in a civilized and calm manner over what has now been a considerable amount of time (and patience in dealing with poor drinking and bathing water). Additionally, their actions cause us to speculate whether we are being penalized for even raising this issue!! We encourage you to withdraw this item from the agenda of tonight's meeting and giving notice to all residents with an opportunity for them to be heard. We look to your actions will bring some credibility back into this process and demonstrate your claim that the City of Edina is willing to work with it's residents at every turn in the bend of local concerns. Sincerely, Nan Schwappach, J.D. Bruna Bucciarelli, PhD Residents of 4010 Lynn Avenue, Morningside Get trade secrets for amazing burgers. Watch "Cooking with Tyler Florence" on AOL Food. SEAL JUN 0 3 7009 RECEIVED Dear Mayor Hovland and City Council members, As much as I appreciate the importance of achieving a satisfactory and timely resolution to the issue of poor water quality in parts of the Morningside neighborhood, I respectfully ask that the City Council not award the bid for relining the water pipes in that area, at the Council Meeting on June 3rd, and that the potential interim and permanent solutions to the water quality problems be explored more fully and openly before a bid is awarded. In particular, my concerns are: - I understand that the low bidder, Insituform, who is being recommended by City staff to be awarded the contract, refuses to release detailed water testing results due to the supposed proprietary nature of the data. This contrasts with the results released by the second - highest bidder, which show very low levels of measured chemicals. Unless residents feel confident with the performance and characteristics of the product being used to supply their water, I am sure that nobody will want to put their trust in such a solution, particularly given the recent findings regarding the common chemical bisphenol A, which is found in many hard plastic products, many of which are now banned in Canada. - I believe that the nominally 6 inch diameter pipes in the affected area have been reduced to a fraction of that diameter due to a buildup of some kind, which would require to be cleaned out before any pipe relining were attempted. Given the very high cost of a plastic pipe relining, it seems to me to be far more prudent, both in terms of cost and of health effects, to simply clean the residue out of the pipes, and then examine whether the quality problem has been reduced or solved. - Along with the previous point, since the streets will be reconstructed within the next few years in any case, why not opt for the interim solution of cleaning the pipes, or possibly cleaning and a concrete liner, such as Minneapolis uses, and which is much cheaper than the plastic process, followed several years later by installation of new pipes when the streets are already being replaced? - In the event of a substantial bid being awarded to address the water quality problem, it is clear from the City staff report to Council, that a "substantial upcharge ", presumably meaning a substantial increase in water fees, will likely need to be assessed to Morningside residents, and others in Edina who use Minneapolis water. No public awareness of this potential fee increase has been communicated to residents. In summary, I would like the City Council and staff to consider the possibility that simply cleaning the pipes, followed by eventual replacement, may solve the problems, although if a plastic liner is still the preferred solution, then I would like to ask that full and detailed testing results are obtained, examined and made publicly available, from all bidders, before any consideration is given towards awarding a contract. In addition, any proposed water fee increase should be published at the earliest opportunity, and residents should be able to comment on such a fee increase. Thank you, Christopher B. Johns 4330 Oakdale Avenue South, Edina, MN 55424 Susan Heiberg From: Lynette Biunno Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 3:01 PM Cc: Susan Heiberg Subject: FW: Interlachen Bike Trail From: Dick H. Dekker [mailto:Dickd @miracletruss.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 12:48 PM To: Lynette Biunno Cc: marygdekker @yahoo.com Subject: Interlachen Bike Trail Edina Council Members Page 1 of 1 JUN 0 3 IN VtECEtVED VIA EMAIL: edinamai1 @ci.edina.mn.us We see that the Interlachen Bike Trail is on the agenda for tonight's council meeting. We will not be able to personally attend tonight's council meeting. (We understand that the Council may not be taking public comment at this time.) We do, however, want to make our view and opinion known on this important issue. We do not support the original bike trail plan along Interlachen Boulevard and/or a bike plan with both a bike lane and pedestrian sidewalks. The City of Edina would have to take too much land and destroy too many valuable trees. We do support the compromise previously proposed that would keep the road the same width but narrow the driving lanes slightly to allow a 4 - 6 foot bike lane on both sides of Interlachen Boulevard. This would not require any taking of any trees or land from property owners. Thank you for your consideration of concerns. Dick & Mary Dekker 4917 Rolling Green Parkway Edina, Minnesota 6/3/2008 SEAL JUN 0 3 y0n9 TO: Mayor and City Council RE�EiVED FROM: Lee Ann Gustafson, 1 Cooper Avenue, Edina, MN 55436 BY The Interlachen /Blake group would fully support putting 4 - 6 foot bike lanes on Interlachen while narrowing the driving lanes. We would all be in favor of that and feel that pedestrians would also use the lanes (let's face it very few pedestrians want to walk on a hilly road that has so much traffic and so much truck traffic -- -it's not a nice leisurely stroll through the neighborhoods that completely surround Interlachen). And frankly, this road doesn't get all that much bike traffic either because it is hilly and busy - - -the bikes and the pedestrians would be able to coexist perfectly. I live on this street and I've watched it for 16 years so I consider myself to be as much of an expert as anyone as to the "traffic habits" of Interlachen Blvd. The Cedar Trail has shared bike and pedestrian lanes that are the same size as the ones we would support and there are no problems there and the traffic on that trail during the weekends is very very high. People find a way to make it work. I personally would not support sidewalks or any separate pedestrian "lane ". I see how many people walk Interlachen and it is very few -- -they might go a hundred feet on Interlachen, but then they almost always turn into a neighborhood and go down to a park or walk the neighborhood instead. A separate pedestrian lane on this road is an irresponsible use of money - -- federal money, state money, Met Council money or city money. It doesn't matter. We all pay for it in the end anyway. Why not try this approach? Use Interlachen as a test street. See how it works. I think it will be a great solution that makes sense for everyone, and one that you might want to emulate in many other areas of the city. Wayne might be against the narrowing the roadways, but Wayne does not represent the citizens of Edina. If it can be done successfully on Highway 100 (and how great is that now - - -it is a huge benefit to traffic congestion) then it can certainly be done successfully on Interlachen. Interlachen's speed is 30 mph and so is Cooper Avenue. Cooper Avenue has narrow lanes just like Interlachen would have. Please support this option council members. In these tough economic times doesn't it make sense to spend money logically and responsibly whether a grant is available or not? Thank you very much! Lee Ann Gustafson Igustafson5@comcast.net 952 - 240 -1269 Honorable Mayor and Council: SEAL ' JUN 0 3 1009 I am a 17 year resident of Edina and have owned homes in Morningside, Country Club, White RECEIVEC BY Oaks, Cornelia, Brucewood, and South Harriett Park. I have also built 12 homes in Edina including 6 in the past 2 years. I would like to voice my concern about the proposed zoning ordinances concerning building height and floor- area -ratio (FAR) that you will be considering at tonight's council meeting. After reviewing the proposal, here is my viewpoint. Height limit: In my opinion based on the homes we build (medium sized homes on small lots in east edina), a 35 -40' ridge height limit will not have much affect on new construction in Edina. However, the ordinance may have an impact on a larger, 3 story homes being built in Rolling Green or Indian Hills. I think this ordinance will also drive flatter roof pitches — which tend to clash with neighborhood character in some areas. I think a city-wide height limit based on lot width discriminates against the owner of a narrow lot in a higher ridge- height neighborhood such as Rolling Green. At the same time, I don't think it will stop the complaining about new homes being out of scale in narrow lot, low ridge neighborhoods such as South Harriett Park since most of the existing homes have ridges of only 21 -26 feet. A 35 foot ridge height will still cause complaints. Therefore, I am opposed to a city -wide height limit based on lot width. More effective would be a neighborhood- appropriate height limit based on the character districts assembled in the city's comprehensive plan. The ordinance the way it is worded is discriminatory and not very effective. Written correctly, a neighborhood- appropriate height limit ordinance would effectively reduce many of the complaints the council hears about homes being "too big," while allowing taller homes to be built in tall home neighborhoods such as Rolling Green. The 3 new homes I am currently building in White Oaks /South Harriett Park have ridge heights from 25 to 28 feet. These were scaled appropriately to the neighboring homes and the neighbors love them! FAR: First of all, the ordinance as written will discriminate against owners of smaller lots in high - value neighborhoods such as the Country Club neighborhood and South Harriett park. For example, there is a teardown for sale on Bruce Avenue. It is being marketed as "not part of the moratorium" since it was built after the preservation date. With a 50 x 131 lot, a 50% FAR would allow a home +garage space of 3275 square feet. Take 450 sf out for the garage and you end up with a 2825 sf home. Now the home is on the market for $649,000 as a teardown. With this new ordinance, the lot's marketability is severely limited due to FAR's limits on its future home's size potential. Economic impacts such as this example will be felt throughout Edina. Secondly, the ordinance as written will reduce the remodeling opportunity of many smaller lot neighborhoods such as country club. The staff report that almost 1/3 of the lots sampled in country club's west side were already non - conforming. The ordinance states they would grant a 10% variance over FAR — however this isn't really enough to build an adequate addition to a home. Thirdly, FAR as written will discriminate against families with more than two kids because it makes it difficult to build a home with more than three bedrooms upstairs in narrow lot neighborhoods. I am currently building a home at 4812 Maple Road with four bedrooms up. The ridge height is 25' and the neighbors all love the home. There is another teardown lot on the street that is the same size. Under FAR, I would have to cut about 800 sf out of the plan. To get this much space out of the plan I would have to cut a bedroom upstairs. Under the new FAR, this home would have to built for a smaller family. FAR as written discriminates against larger families. Finally, FAR as written excludes many of the exclusions written in the Mpls FAR code. While I personally would never model anything after what Mpls does (i.e. snow plowing), the Edina FAR excludes many of the Mpls FAR features such as: exclusions form FAR calc for ' /z story space (which is very prevalent in Edina's narrow lot neighborhoods and should thus be encourages as a style element), and allowance for a 500 sf addition for an existing home that exceeds FAR (the 10% allowance as written isn't really adequate for any type of addition). I am opposed to a city -wide FAR based on lot width. Its broad -brush approach adds a discriminatory cloud over the housing market in Edina. Better would be a neighborhood - appropriate scaling method that would take into account the differences and nuances of each neighborhood. For example, if you took a house in country club and dropped it in South Harriett Park, people would complain about its mass even though it came from the same size lot. The FAR as written doesn't recognize these nuances. At best, it's a watered -down, brutish version of the MPLS ordinance. On a general note, I fell these continued efforts by the council to restrict development in Edina are creating a black cloud over our market. Since the moratorium was discusses in December, there has been a definite slowdown in new construction in Edina. Per the city's Dodge report, there were 19 new home permits issued from January through May 2007. From January through May 2008 there have been only 11 permits issued. This is a dramatic reduction that may be due to the uncertainty being created in the market. I personally have pulled back on projects due to the uncertainty. We are planning only one project this year. Another layer of constrictive ordinances would put a long term clamp on development and new families moving to Edina. Thanks for listening to me on this issue. I respect the position you are in as a council. I know you get a lot of complaints from the small, activist groups in Edina. Please remember to think of the viewpoint of the silent majority in Edina, the stakeholders who spoke out loud and clear during the moratorium discussion. These ordinances need further fleshing out, and should not be enacted based on how they are written. The problem once again is that none of the affected stakeholders (homeowners, builders, realtors) in Edina know this is even being discussed at tonight's meeting. They will wake up Wednesday and read about it in the newspaper. Scott Busyn Great Neighborhood Homes, Inc. 5018 Arden Avenue Edina, MN 55424 Ph: 952 - 807 -8765 Fx: 952 - 926 -1168 SEAL "c9 OFFICE OF GOVERNOR TIM FA WL 3 7009 130 State Capitol • Saint Paul, MN 55155 651) 29 oROCEIVED -2''rEWS RELEA SIP. FOR E%E%MDIATE RELEASE: Contact: Brian McClung May 30, 2008 (651) 296 -0001 GOVERNOR PAWLENTY ANNOUNCES METROPOLITAN COUNCIL DISTRICT 5 FINALISTS Saint Paul — Governor Tim Pawlenty today announced that he has accepted three finalists recommended to him by the Metropolitan Council Nominating Committee for an unscheduled vacancy on the Metropolitan Council in District 5. The vacancy occurred as a result of the resignation of Russell H. Susag. District 5 includes the Hennepin County cities of Bloomington, Edina, and Richfield, and the unorganized territory of Fort Snelling. Ten people applied for this position. The finalists are Polly Peterson Bowles, John E. Lonsbury, and James N. Lucas. Bowles, of Edina, is a stay -at -home mother and a community volunteer. Previously, she was an attorney who practiced law with Faegre and Benson. Bowles served on the Metropolitan Council in the early 1990s, during which time she was vice- chair; and was a member of the State Advisory Council on Metropolitan Governance. Lonsbury, of Edina, is founder and president of Customer - Facing Media Company, and has a professional background in business, marketing and sales consulting. He has been a member of the Edina Planning Commission for 1.1 years, currently serving as chair;. chairs the Edina Comprehensive Plan Task Force; and was previously vice chair of the Edina Human Relations Commission. Lucas, of Bloomington, is the founder and owner of Benefits Plus, LLC. He has also been a financial representative with Northwestern Mutual Financial Network, and previously with Connecticut Mutual. Lucas is a. member of the Bloomington Planning Commission as well as the Bloomington Charter Commission, and has held leadership positions with the Bloomington Rotary and Bloomington Chamber of Commerce. The Metropolitan Council coordinates planning and development in the seven county metropolitan area and directly operates several regional services. The Metropolitan Council consists of 16 metropolitan citizens appointed from geographically defined districts in the seven county metropolitan area and a chair. All 17 members are appointed by the Governor to four -year terms that are co- terminus with the Governor. - -30 -- Voice: (651) 296 -3391 or (800) 657 -3717 Fax: (651) 296 -0056 ♦ TDD: (651) 296 -0075 or (800) 657 -3598 Web site: hM: / /www.govemor.state.mn.us An Equal Opportunity Employer SEAL _ <; MAY 21 10['9 Kathy and Steve Clark 6132 Ridgeway Rd RECENVE® Edina MN 55436 3y 952- 920 -9366 May 21" 2008 Dear Council Members, Our family has been the unfortunate neighbors of a speculative house construction at 6128 Westridge Ave. The 11,000 square foot house ($3.9M asking price for unfinished home) was built eleven feet from our property which includes our 2,250 square foot home. This was allowed under the existing Edina city ordinance. The builder started construction almost 2 years ago in the summer of '06 with moving the purchased house. As soon as the digging of the new foundation started in the winter of '06, we called the city engineering department as well as other city offices. We feared we would be harmed by the close foundation, which is at least 15 feet deep, and the house that is at least three feet higher than the property before. The City Engineer said that he would watch the builder. . Last fall the builder, Mark Holt, installed a 3 foot high retaining wall along a portion of our yard, only three feet away. At that point he stopped working on the property, did not finish the interior of the house, nor the retaining wall, yard, etc. The building materials, dumpster, etc. have been in the yard for close to 2 years. But the damaging part of all this has been the extreme water damage created by this construction and the retaining wall that drains into our yard. This spring as the snow melted, we not only had our own melt but had water pouring into our yard from this monster house. Every time it rains substantially, the same thing happens with about 8 inches of standing water, covering about 1/3 of our yard. The only way for this water to recede is for it to seep into our basement system and our sump pump to continually pump it out. Our sump pump has cycled continuously for 8 weeks and only this week slowed. Steve Kirshman, the city engineer I have spoken with, came out after my calls, and talked to the builder. Steve told me that the builder had put in drain tile under part of the retaining wall but did not have an outlet for the water. Therefore, the water drains into our property, flooding it to our house. Although I know that Steve has continually contacted the builder, the builder has not corrected the problem as he promised. We are extremely concerned about this because: 1) The water is so high and extreme that we think it will cause cracking in our foundation. We already have a very large crack (which was small last year) along our back porch where the water sits — see attached picture. 2) Sump pumps are not made to continually cycle like ours does. If it should burn out or the electricity should go out in a storm, our entire lower level will be flooded. 3) Several of our trees have been submerged for weeks, which threaten their livelihood according to Bachmans. 4) Our property has been devalued by this monster house's creating a severe standing water problem. The builder, Sandalwood Homes, has removed all For Sale signs; his own signs and is delinquent on this and last years Hennepin County taxes (according to Hennepin County property tax internet site). We do not believe he has the solvency to solve this problem. We have suffered damage through no fault of our own. And we feel we have been hurt by both this builder's irresponsibility and by the lack of protection from Edina's building ordinances. We fear what potential damage can occur to both our home and property from every substantial rain storm. Can the city help us? Can the drainage tile be connected to a storm sewer line? When will the city be able to step in to take action so that we do not have to continually worry about a home we have lived in for almost 20 years? Thank you for any assistance you can provide, Kathy Clark -� � _ _.____.J_.._..__ __ _.�. .,� - -_ } -- . ay f *�< � ' M x., � �a Y � �• 1 w / , � ,. ��►' dF a• ;pit E3 � A� _, :.. _,._ +�� s Il � �' � _, ::UA Metropolitan Council v May 22, 2008 CIT `gyp c SEAS < Gordon Hughes MAY 7n ; City Manager RecCI VIED City of Edina 81' 4801 W 50th St Edina, MN 55424 -1394 Dear Mr Hughes: As required by Minnesota Statutes 473.24, the Metropolitan Council annually prepares population and household estimates as of April I of the previous year. After local governments have the opportunity to review and comment on the preliminary estimates, the Council certifies final estimates by July 15 for use in allocating local government aid (LGA) and local street aid. The Metropolitan Council estimates that the City of Edina had 47,090 people and 21,250 households as of April 1, 2007. Household size averaged 2.19 persons per household. Starting with counts from the 2000 Census, the Council estimates current population and households through changes in the housing stock, vacancy rates and persons per household. Input data sources now include the U.S. Census Bureau's American Community Survey, occupancy information from the U.S. Postal Service, and surveys conducted by Metropolitan Council Research. To update decennial Census data, the Council uses current and newly - available data sources which indicate slight increases in residential vacancy rates and small losses in the number of persons per household since 2000. After local suggestions prompted an in -depth review of current Census data, the Council has adjusted the persons per household in areas with accelerating single- family home construction. Incorporating newly - available data and ongoing methodological improvements, these estimates provide a realistic, real -time representation of population and household growth since 2000 but are not completely comparable to prior years' estimates. Beginning this year, the Council is pleased to provide you a report of the data inputs and intermediate estimates used to develop your local population and household estimates. Those who attended the Council's Population Estimates Workshops in April and May will find this format familiar; others may visit the Council's website or contact Council Research staff for assistance. (See www. metrocouncil. org /metroarea/AboutEstimates.btm, or contact Todd Graham at 651- 602 - 1322.) Council staff welcomes discussion of these preliminary estimates. Under Minnesota Statutes 473.24, the Metropolitan Council must receive your comments, questions or challenges to these preliminary estimates in writing by June 24, 2008. By law, the Metropolitan Council certifies the estimates of population and the average household size by July 15, including any estimates still under objection. Please send any written comments or questions to Todd Graham, Metropolitan Council Research, or by e-mail to todd.graham@metc.state.mn.us . Sincerely, 9-rw_L'�r Libby S arling Research Manager www.metrocouncil.org 390 Robert Street North • St. Paul, MN 55101 -1805 • (651) 602 -1000 • Fax (651) 602 -1550 • TTY (651) 291 -0904 An Equal Opportunity Employer 2007 Population Estimates: Edina city, Hennepin County, Minnesota Households 21,2$0 Population in households 46,591 Persons per household 2.190 Population in group quarters 499 ', Total population 47,090 The Council's model accounts for built housing stock changes since 2000. These include hou units permitted, gross additions and gross losses. Relying on research by the US Census Bureau, the Council's mode ssumes that not all housing units permitted will be built in the year permitted. Permtted Years fe itt Estimated units built New housing units permitted 2000 -2005 6 2000 -2006 Single-family detached 1791 + r231 x 95% = 228 Duplex / threeplex /fourplex 0 + x 90% _ � 2 Townhouses /single family attached + x so% = 21 Multifamily Y x 80% = 375 Estimated new housing units permitted and built: 6261 Other gross changes to housing stock 20 - Total additions and Year 2006 losses 2000 -2006 Gross additions include building conversions (units d), cated structures, units annexed in: Single-family detached additions 2 0 o' Duplex/ threeplex /fourplex a ion 01 01 o Townhouse additions Alf ; o ; i o Multifamily additions o 01 o Gross losses include demoli bmi't eonvers Single-family del FoftmwoNs Duplex / three f rplex losses Townhouse losses Multifamily losses Total other gross changes to housing stock: Total changes to housing stock, 2000 -2006: AA" Metropolitan Council V ions (units lost), relocated structures, units annexed out: -82 54 -136' -2 1 I -2 01 01 0 01 01 0 -138 488 i Tuesday, May 20, 2008 Page 97 of 388 2007 Population Estimates: Edina city, Hennepin County, Minnesota Estimates of housing stock are segmented into ownership housing and rental housing. The ownership housing subtotal is controlled to a target ownership range of 100 to 107 percent of the homestead units count from the Abstract of Assessment. Each housing type will have a specifically estimated occupancy rate. Each combination of housing type and tenure (ownership housing or rental) will have a specifically estimated average household size. Housing stock estimated for April Single-family detached 1-12,565 Duplex / threeplex /fourplex 465 Townhouses 1,226 Multifamily 7,884 Estimated built housing units 1 22,140 Mobile homes 0 Boats, etc., serving as housing L�J Following housing stock estimation, the Council model type, to determine occupied housing. The number of 4 group of people (or a person living alone) occupy% a . (* Institutional or group quarters housing is accoun Homeownership rates by type ofhousine (estimated) Owned. ,v Occupancy rates ned Rented 97.3% 52.7 %1 91.0% I 75.5 1 93.5% 40.3 %; t 92.6% 1 1 95.9% j Occupancy rates 95.0% I 1oo.o °i° j sing units by occupancy rates, segmented by housing Ksing units is equivalent to households: A household is a sing housing unit. through an annual survey by Metropolitan Council.) Households 21,250 Population in households is estimate kg g, �cccupied housing units (equivalent to households) by average household sizes (persons per household), segm�ig type and tenure. The final step in poulation estimation is to add population in households + pop%}�"q�u� arters, counted by the Council's annual survey. O- occupied Renter - occupied Single-family deta 2.708; 2.7561 Duplex / threeplex /fou 1 1.665 2.079 Townhouses ; 1.728 2.3121 Population in households' 46,591 Mu 1.3461 1.457 Po ulation in group quarters 499 ifamy 2.420 1 Total population 47,0901 2.000 Mobile homes Boats, etc., serving as housing Metropolitan Council Tuesday, May 20, 1008 A Page 98 of 388 AA The 20. Census is on the Horizon The U.S. Census Bureau and the Minnesota State Demographic Center want to be sure that everyone is counted in the 2010 Census. The 20,10 Census is local. Complete Count Committees (CCC), composed of community leaders, keep. friends and neighbors informed, help them understand the census and emphasize the need for a good count. Partnerships with local and tribal governments, community -based organizations, faith -based groups, schools, businesses, the media and others will help us count every Minnesotan. Working together, Minnesotans will once again lead the nation in answering the Census. Your Complete Count Committee is key to making this happen. Local governments and community groups can help the Census Bureau get a complete count in 2010. CCCs incorporate local knowledge, influence and resources to educate residents and promote the census. CCCs coordinate efforts between local governments, communities and the U.S. Census Bureau. Start Your Cc nittee Now Y ;WH`, 7 i a State, local and tribal governments work together with partners in the community to form Complete Count Committees to promote the 2010 Census. Community - based organizations also establish CCCs. 3 3. a Ysfit J h F J�A�t��y� t Cr ny i ay,t 0G1F Complete Count Committees are made up of community leaders working to develop and implement an outreach and awareness campaign for the 2010 Census. Local community leaders can best reach all the people in their area to ensure everyone is counted. Begin now to identify community leaders and budget resources. Establish the CCC work plan. In 2010, the CCCs will implement their plans and Lead their communities to a successful census count in Minnesota. rte y.. H r �i You know the best way to reach your community. Activities could include rallies or parades, luncheons, media events, forums for youth, interfaith breakfasts or other special functions. It's up to you! Early Involvemei of State, Local and Tribal Governments is Crucial "The 2010 Census will be critical for Minnesota. Complete Count Committees are the key to our success because they organize where it counts - in our state's communities, at the grassroots. I strongly urge your participation in Complete Count to ensure that "Every I Counts in Minnesota." Dana R. 6adgerow, Commissioner Minnesota Department of Administration "iCuentas td, contamos todos! As a recent immigrant to Minnesota, this is the first time I will be counted by the census. The Complete Count Committee is crucial to ensure that every individual and family in our community is contacted, informed, and counted. This will ensure that Minnesotanos. specifically and Minnesotans in general, receive a fair share of federal and state allocations. Together, let's make sure that every resident in our neighborhood is properly counted. i)untos podemos!" Rosa Tock, Legislative Director, Chicano Latino Affairs Council "Nyob Zoo! Kuv yog State Senator Mim Muas. The census is very important to the preservation of our democracy. Population size is the sole factor for apportioning political representation at all levels of government. Population size also affects how federal funds, such as public housing dollars, are allocated to the states.Make the time, pay attention to this opportunity and make sure you are counted." Mee Moua, State Senator - District 67 'The work of our Foundation relies on identifying demographic trends in our region. Accurate and thorough data allows for better planning on our part for the investments we make in the economic and workforce arenas. A detailed census for Southern Minnesota is vital to us and others who are engaged in addressing the needs and the opportunities for our region." Tim Penny, Southern Minnesota Initiative Fund 2.010 C ,- -sus Timeline 2008 �. Local census offices open Community leaders organize Complete Count Committees (CCC) 2009 a CCC is established 0 CCC receives census training e CCC develops strategy and work plan o CCC spreads word about census jobs 2010 * CCC begins community organization a CCC launches 2010 Census publicity campaign 0 Questionnaires are delivered to every address April I, 2010 CENSUS DAY o Households return completed census questionnaires o CCC urges nonresponding households to cooperate with census takers * CCC thanks the community for their participation in the 2010 Census December 3 i , 2010 Census delivers population counts to the President GQ OTS IN � tit CA W p too .a 0 FNS us 20� "We know that the face of rural Minnesota, especially, is changinf ry day this change presents both enormoi- . portunities and challenges for our communities. And if we don't account for every person through the census, we will not be prepared to help our newest residents to be successful." Jim Hoolihan, President, Blandin Foundation, Grand Rapids "An accurate census count is the fundamental building block of every community. Census data provides guidance for communities to determine the current and future needs of its citizens and is an integral tool for governments, businesses, schools and many others." Mark Voxland, Mayor, Moorhead "The American Indian population is near the numbers when Europeans arrived here on Turtle Island over 500 years ago. Our numbers dwindled to a mere 250,000 by 1900, it is important that we be counted in 2010 to show that we are resilient and strong for our children." Kay Sha Bow Osay (Walking Around) Anishinabe, Joseph 13. Day "Policymakers and economists rely on data to drive their analysis and to shape their proposals. More complete and accurate data mean better analysis and policymaking, which outweigh the cost of collection. Minnesotans should take advantage of this important opportunity." Arthur J. Rolnick, Director of Research, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Contact Information This document can be made available in alternative formats, such as large print, Braille, or audio tape or disk by calling 651 - 201 -2558. Consumers with a hearing or speech disability may contact us through the Minnesota Relay Service at 711 or 800 - 627 -3529, or via email (admin.lnfo @state. mn. us). www.mn201 Ocensus.org www.census.gov /2010 Minnesota Complete Count Committee USCENSUSBUREAU �GIpNTS ly4i2 W �N ui a r Edina Comprehensive Plan - Workine Draft 2 -29 -08 Page Reference Statement Introduction Messages & Themes 1 -3 "Mix new housing and retail together ..." 1 -3 "Protect our single- family neighborhoods." Vision, Goals & Objectives Comment This was NOT an input from the public. Repeated suggestions were made at public hearings that ALL residential areas should be protected from commercial intrusion. 2 -10 "Review zoning standards and the Encourages spot zoning. development approval system to provide increased flexibility ..." 2 -11 "Facilitate the conversion of appropriate areas Doesn't define "appropriate "; to residential/commercial mixed -use ..." threatens residential areas. 2 -11 "Strengthen the Greater Southdale Area as a To remove ambiguity, mixed use district ..." delete "Greater" from all Comp Plan references to plans for the Southdale area. 2 -11 "Introduce higher density housing and taller This strategy was rejected by buildings judiciously. . residents who testified at public hearings. Land Use and Community Design 4.1 "It will be necessary to closely monitor and A well prepared Land Use Plan update the Land Use Plan on a regular basis, should not require updating at least once every five years." more than once every 10 years. More frequent updating lends itself to inappropriate meddling and spot zoning. 4 -3 "In this manner [cites Southdale Shopping Existence of Southdale Center Center] the Future Land Use Plan seeks in no way supports mixed use to provide a greater flexibility to allow mixed with respect to residential areas. use in areas where is (sic) appropriate." 4-4 "In their 2005 data, the Metro Council recognizes I acre of [Mixed Use Residential] at ... France and West 54th Street." 4 -19 "The current zoning and land development review system provides limited scope and discretion to adequately address building, site and community design issues." 529/2008 3:58 PM This one instance of the Mixed Use Residential designation in Edina by the Met Council does not justify or warrant the substantial use of this designation throughout the draft Land Use Plan. No evidence of this being a problem. The zoning code is intended to foster orderly development and protect existing property owners. Edina Comprehensive Plan - Working Draft 2 -29 -08 4 -20 "Development intensity and infrastructure "Centennial Lakes" area should capacity." be deleted from areas zoned for "intensive use ". 4 -21 Land Use Goals "1. Protect and preserve the essential character of Delete "low density" from existing low- density residential neighborhoods." Goals. All residential areas should be protected. 4 -22 "6. Increase mixed use development ..." Public commentary not supportive of mixed use development. 4 -23 Future Land Use Plan (map) Should be limited to 4 stories as MXC designation of west side of Promenade are the west side of Centennial should be modified. Building Heights map on Lakes Middle and North Ponds. 4 -51 would permit 10 stories. Residential units directly fronting the east side of the Promenade are 4 stories high. Allowing greater height on the Promenade would create a canyon effect shutting out the sun. 448 to 4 -55 Building Height Issues While the Comp Plan draft has conceptual merit, it opens a Pandora's box of issues that will plague Edina for the foreseeable future. The heights displayed on pages 4 -50, 4 -51, and 4 -53 will be used by the development community as acceptable. The heights displayed on these pages are inconsistent with the accompanying narrative. They should be subjected to greater scrutiny before they are included in the Comp Plan. 5/29/2008 3:58 PM 2 1 , Mike Siitari To: Mike Siitari ubject: FW: Thank You Dear Chief Siitari, SEAL MAY 3 0 2009 RECEIVED My name is Jennifer Fordham. and I am a police officer in Mendota Heights. I am currently assigned as the school resource officer at Henry Sibley High School. Our school held it's prom at Edinborough in Edina on Saturday May 17th. I was unable to attend this year due to family conflicts but knowing that your department already staffs events at that facility made me and the school administrators and chaperones feel reassured that if anything were to happen that would need police assistance it would be taken care of by the officer from Edina PD who was assigned to work the event. On Monday the 19th when school resumed, I asked the administrators and chaperones how it all went. Many of them commented that it was a great prom, no major issues, and the highlight of the event was the very courteous, friendly, and professional officer from Edina who was present. No one seemed to be able to remember his name but I heard nothing but wonderful things about how he interacted with the staff and students from our school. In addition to that, I want you to know that he went above and beyond what was expected of him that evening. Let me explain: This year, we decided to try an "Alcohol -Free Prom Campaign ". We had heard of other schools doing this in the country and area but what it entails is having PBT's and volunteers on hand to give'kids breathalyzer tests as they enter the prom. If they participate and pass (hopefully) they get their name in a raffle and the community and local businesses donated prizes for the winners. We thought this would be a great way to reward the.kids who make positive choices instead of always focusing on the negative. The ^ommunity and school totally bought into the idea and for our first year, it was a great lccess. Here is how your officer comes into play: when we brainstormed this idea, I was ,,lanning on being there to help administer all these tests! Well the family conflict came up so I helped get everything organized on the front end and I got all the PBT's and tubes lined up and sent them with our chemical health advisor to the event. Well, one of the PBT's that I thought they would use the most ended up failing so we ended up relying on two PBT's with a different kind of tube, so we RAN OUT of tubes! Your officer somehow rounded up more tubes and ended up having a a reserve bring an additional PBT from your office and jumped right in to help out! We probably wouldn't have gotten the 320 willing participants tested and the campaign would not have been as successful without the help of your officer. Please extend a thank you to this officer as he deserves it. I have been an SRO for four years -now and I know how much most patrol officers dread high school kids!!! :) I was so relieved when I heard that this officer was more than eager to help out, without even being asked, and interacted with our students in such.a professional and positive manner!! Please thank him for me or let me know if there is anything else I can do!! Sincerely, Officer Jennifer Fordham Mendota Heights PD SRO Sibley High School 1 May 22, 2008 Edina City Council: As an Edina property owner and taxpayer, I was disappointed and discouraged by the actions of city staff and city council relating to the Calvin Christian school project, on display at the council meeting held on May 20. Our city's new official precedent finds that a 30% upward deviation from the plan publicly discussed and approved is an insubstantial change, no violation has occurred, and no consequence is imposed. After public hearings and neighborhood input, a conditional use permit was issued to Calvin Christian School allowing improvements outlined and illustrated in the application documents. In the granting of the CUP, those responsible for the design and execution of the project represented that the inevitable changes required in the actual construction process would not amount to more than a 2x4 here and there. When the homeowners nearest the project noticed a substantial increase in the construction height from that represented in the CUP documentation, and brought their concerns to the attention of the city, it was discovered that a building permit had been issued allowing the size of the project to grow by more than 30 %. In accounting practices, a deviation of as little as half of one percent can be characterized as a material difference requiring public disclosure; it is inconceivable that in building construction, a 30% increase does not rise to the level of "significant." At the May 20"' council meeting, the architect's work product —on which all aspects of the construction process hinged —and reputation were staunchly defended by proponents of the school project, and the motives of elected representatives having the temerity to examine the process and ask pertinent questions were impugned. Rather than admit a mistake was made in issuing a building permit and finding .a way to rectify that mistake in a way that protects the interests of the City of Edina, a new precedent has been established. By now, builders and developers know that they can deviate from approved building dimensions by 30% or more in Edina, and the city has publicly determined that such changes are not substantial: no violation has occurred, therefore, no penalty will be imposed. It is absolutely appropriate that complaint be made when a construction project deviates substantially from the plan publicly approved, and it is imperative that the city council carry out their responsibility to their constituency with processes and standards on which all can rely. Mollie Kenne y Harper �kxp X17 0 0 4234 Scott Te . ace 5�,�� Edina, Minnesota 5�ifi.— �Ai' 2 ppD9 8Y i Susan Heiberg From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 5:40 AM Subject: FW: Country Club Neighborhood Summer Kick -Off Event Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 - 833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 jbennerotte@ci.edina.mn.us From: Rob Webb [mailto:rwebb3 @comcast.net] Sent: Monday, May 26, 2008 5:13 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Country Club Neighborhood Summer Kick -Off Event MAY 2 7 ?nila RECEIVED Page 1 of 1 The annual Country Club neighborhood -wide block party is Saturday, June 7th at 5:00 PM. The invitation is extended to the city council and staff. The venue will once again be the intersection of Wooddale and Bridge... approximately the middle of the neighborhood. Please join us! Please RSVP to bsmcgrath@earthlink.net so we can have an estimate of attendees. 5/27/2008 /CITY E SEAL MAV 2 7 7009 RECEIVED Mayor and Members of city Council, My name is Troy Mathwig. I live at 4126 West 45th Street, Edina. I attended the Council meeting on Tuesday May 20, 2008. 1 do have one child that attends the Calvin Christian School. I . didn't speak because my real outrage came after the public hearing was closed and Council member Bennett finished with her accusations and slander against this school and the architect. I would first like to understand the cities policy for investigating Council member's actions when their motives are slanderous, unreasonable and political in nature only? I knew nothing of this issue before I attended this meeting. As I first began to listen, I could understand a possible miscommunication between various parties involved. After hearing the testimonies, especially from the city staff, I felt very uneasy with the slanderous remarks that were made by a few of the Council members. At this point it wasn't enough to be called egregious, just very disappointing and seemingly unreasonable. After the public hearing was closed, member Bennett suggested the school be "found in violation and work with the city on the mass ". If you were not listening, the school has been working with the city and they have been blasted for it. The Council has given city staff the authority to allow changes, or not. The school had nothing to do with this decision. Member Bennett also suggested that the school did not "bring to staffs attention" the changes. This was another example of digging for dishonest behavior from this member. We as citizens cannot,'and do not, separate city staff and city Council. If staff tells us something is okay, why would we question? You are one in the same. This school followed city guidelines and appears to have been more careful than most. This issue has been called a "mistake" on the part of the architect and the school. I must be missing something. On all other projects, this would be called a change to the plans, for this schools project, it's called a mistake by the school and the architect after they attain staff approval. If any mistake has been made, it's on the part of the city Council. I don't blame the school or the architect; I don't blame the neighbor or even the city staff. With the ultimate authority and decision for a vote on whether to find the school in violation falling on the Council, as member Bennett stated, also comes the ultimate responsibility of fault. You can't have it both ways. This Council needs to step up and take responsibility for their actions and comments. I want to see a public apology to the school from this Council. Furthermore, the city should pay the attorney and staff expenses that have been incurred by the school. This was not "the process working ". This was a clear example of slanderous comments, bias and unfair treatment of an owner that did everything by the cities rules, your rules. I would also like to see that Council member Bennett be found in violation of her ethical role as a Council member. The city needs to publish documentation to anyone seeking any kind of development in the city of Edina describing the need to seek council approval, after they receive staff approval and construction drawing approval, for ALL changes to any development, no matter how slight they may be. Keep in mind, my issue isn't even the extent of the change in drawings, although no member would have approved one of these plans and not the other, they both fell well within the CUP guidelines, but that's another issue. If the city produces this statute, we can all be assured we will not be forced to hire an attorney, spend our own time and emotional effort with the threat of being dragged into a council hearing for approvals we already received from you because one neighbor has a "friend" in the council and they may complain. This process, whoever is responsible, stepped over the line, not the school. This process clearly abused and treated one owner unfairly. I hope the Mayor and Council does not possess too much pride and think too highly of themselves to not admit they were wrong. I have attended many council meeting and have disagreed with many decisions, this is the only time I lost all respect for the decision and comments of a Mayor or Council member. .I also believe member Bennett has lost a great deal of credibility among other members and citizens of Edina. I write this not on behalf or with the approval of Calvin Christian School, but as a citizen of Edina, who has developed real estate. I am very concerned with the process and how an owner can be treated and the reputation of this school or anyone else coming in with this happening to them. Council member Housh was the only member who spoke up about the fact that the school followed all the rules. Troy Mathwig 952 - 405 -6404 Phone 952 - 405 -6408 Fax 612 - 275 -0808 Cell 6121 Excelsior Boulevard Suite 102 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 troym @mathwigdevelopment.com O� SEA1, To: Mayor Hovland and Council members, MAY 2 a 7009 I would like the council and community to learn from the Calvin Christian School process that RECEIVED failed the spirit of trust among Calvin Christian School, our city council, the Edina community an BY especially the adjoining neighbors to the project. We all go through our daily lives operating on the basis of "good faith ". When a drawing is presented and attested to as a rendition of fact we need to trust that this is what will be built. Our planning dept. is to act as the policing force to see that the agreement is followed. I repeatedly heard Calvin Christian officials say that our planning dept. worked with them and approved the "slight" changes. Our planning dept. is a disappointment to the spirit of "good faith" that we entrust them with. Our city council was very clear as to the intent; this is what you will build, Mr. Teaque did not enforce the agreement. He chose to lower the standard set in the council chambers to only code requirements. If Calvin Christian only had to meet city code we would not need a council approval process. Mr. Teague was negligent in several areas. He did not compare the rendition with the construction drawings. He approved them. He approved a 4 foot (not 4 inches) elevation change as slight. He approved a mass increase as with in code. He approved removal of windows as another slight change not worthy of mentioning to council. We have a problem. The building will not be lowered or shrunk. It will stand as a monument to a city process that failed to reflect a positive partnership between property owners and city governance. The trees will not be returned to shade our community. I do not feel that there is a conspiracy against the school. Our planning dept. saw Calvin Christian School's vision through each step of construction. It appears that the council does need to "micromanage" city functions until city staff starts enforcing the "good faith" agreements that the city enters into daily. How do we improve this process? What message do we send to future developers that want to follow our city process? Do city staff and committees lead, facilitate or interpret code. The council is elected to lead; city staffs role is to facilitate the wishes of the council or notify council if not attainable. Thank You, Jan Ferrell 4704 West 70th Street May 23, 2008 To: Edina City Council Members ��,GITY C� SEM MAY 2 3 71 RECEIVED My name is Paul Staples and I live at 5209 Halifax Ave. After attending the public hearing on the Halifax Westside sidewalk proposal Tuesday evening (May 20, 2008), 1 felt compelled to give you my thoughts. I sat in this hearing, empathizing with neighbors from the Westside of the street who were imploring you to consider the aesthetics of the street, the trees, the yards, and their personal space. I empathized because that was the same message that the Eastside of the street presented to you last September. To say that I was shocked at your concerns and comments once the floor was closed about the trees, the fact that the majority of the Westside residents were not in favor of a sidewalk on their side of the street and the cost is an understatement. I honestly had to remind myself that I was listening to opinions from the same council members who totally ignored those same arguments last September on the grounds of public safety. What took place at this hearing can be described as nothing short of an abomination. How you could apply the exact opposite criteria to the Eastside decision and then justify your actions on Tuesday evening is beyond me., I was opposed to sidewalks on either side of the street, but could rationalize the council's concern over safety and therefore, accepted defeat on the Eastside sidewalk for the safety of all on the street. However, what you have done with this reversal of thought and action has left me without respect or regard for any members of the council. Your "flip- flopping" has managed to pit neighbor against neighbor on a street that once had an incredible atmosphere and a true sense of community. You approved sidewalks on one side of the street under the auspice of safety and when the opportunity arose to support the action by putting sidewalks on both sides, you failed to truly endorse safety. And, you have managed through your waffling to make all but a few on Halifax who are as inconsistent as yourselves, unhappy with the final outcome. I hope that Halifax residents on both the East and Westside of the street remember this debacle when voting time comes. I personally will make it my mission to do.everything in my power to see that each of you does not get reelected. Sincerely, Paul Staples Paul C. Staples, PhD, CPT Managing Principal iinteg, inc. Office: 678.916.4680 Direct: 952.922.5204 Mobile: 952.250.7885 pstaples o,iinteg.com CITY- SEAL From: Lynn Hovde [mailto:lehovde @comcast.net] Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 4:59 PM H�`'I��® To: Jennifer Bennerotte SY° Subject: Calvin Christian Building Project Members of the Counsel, We find ourselves in the same place we were just a few short months ago with issues regarding our school expansion. I respect the viewpoint of the neighbors surrounding the school; however I am having trouble understanding their grounds for wanting to stop the construction at this juncture. If I understand correctly, the neighbors had access to the plans and changes to the plans throughout this process. The city has approved the plan and putting a hold on this project will only cause increased costs and considerable inconvenience to many parties. Our family has been at Calvin for the past eight years and have always known them to be good stewards of the property and considerate to their neighbors. We find no real substance to this complaint and respectfully ask you to let the school proceed with the project. Our goal is to be complete for the beginning of the 2008 -09 school year this September. This project is so desperately needed and long overdue for the school. Thank you for your involvement and time spent with this matter. We hope that the meeting this evening will be a time of good debate and end with both parties issues settled. Sincerely, Lynn Hovde 5526 Malibu Drive Edina No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.524 / Virus Database: 269.23.2]/]456 - Release Date: 5/20/2008 6:45 AM Susan Heiberg From: Jennifer Bennerotte Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 4:00 PM Cc: Susan Heiberg Subject: FW: Comprehensive Plan for the City of Edina Jennifer Bennerotte Communications & Marketing Director City of Edina 952 -833 -9520 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 jbennerotte@ci . edina. mn. us - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Wallin Bradford [rnailto:bwwallin@yahoo.com] Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 11:31 AM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Comprehensive Plan for the City of Edina Dear Edina City Council Members, > We are writing to express our opposition to the Housing Section of the >proposed Edina Comprehensive Plan. >Please do not try to "social engineer" our Great City. >Thank you for your consideration, >Brad & Cyndy Wallin >6612 Mohawk Trail i SEPAL MAY 2 �. 2009 RECEIVED CITY SFAe. MAY 2 1 2009 REvEIVEU From: Karen Heine [mai Ito: khei ne@straticom. us] Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 3:33 PM To: Jennifer Bennerotte Subject: Calvin Christian As a Morningside resident and a long -time Edina resident, I am very concerned about the Calvin building. Edina should be more concerned about surrounding homes and trees than to allow builders to not follow original plans. The project has ruined the very natural surroundings of Weber Park and the neighborhood. I am upset they took down numerous mature trees, and that the building looks so out of place because of the immense size. Calvin Christian used to fit into the neighborhood. Now it is an eyesore for neighbors and anyone using Weber Park. Will the comp plan make sure mistakes like this will not happen in the future? Karen Heine kheinee- straticom. us 952 - 922 -5780 EDINA HUMAN RIGHTS & RELATIONS COMMISSION TUESDAY, APRIL 22, 2008 8:00 PM - EDINBOROUGH PARK AMPHITHEATER Members Present Luis Bartolomei Peter Brauer Mary Brindle Emery Erickson Idelle Longman JoAnn McGuire Andy Otness Wayne Prochniak Russell Stanton Member Absent Colleen Feige Staff Susan Heiberg Recipient of Tom Oye Human Rights Award Congratulated After the finale of the Volunteer Recognition Reception, the Commissioners moved to the Amphitheater of Edinborough Park to begin the meeting. It was an honor for them to be visited by the recipient of this year's Human Rights Award —Debby McNeil —a recently - retired Commission member. She expressed appreciation for the honor and received congratulations and well wishes from all. New Member Introduced and Welcomed Peter Brauer, a recent School -Board appointee, was introduced and welcomed by the Commission, and introductions were made all around. Minutes Approved Member Longman's seconded Member Brindle's motion to approve the minutes of March 25, 2008; the motion carried. Bias /Hate Crime Response Plan and Brochure As a result of the last Commission meeting, the Plan was edited and the contact names were updated. The draft for a brochure was sent to the City's Communications Director who will forward a sample back for the Commissioners' consideration. Locations discussed for the distribution of the new brochures included the Chamber of Commerce, the Library, the schools, Senior Center, Welcome Packets, Resource Center, apartment buildings, and Police officers' vehicles. The Police Chief would be a welcome guest at a future Commission meeting. Strategic Planning Set to Begin Chair Bartolomei extended an invitation to Commissioners to meet at his home in the near future to carve out the framework for an updated strategic plan for the Commission. Local Amnesty International Event Discussed Member Brindle reminded the Commissioners that high school senior, Catherine Elliott, was planning a special concert on behalf of Amnesty International at Centennial Lakes on May 22 "d from 5 to 9 PM. Anything the Commission could do to help publicize or participate would be appreciated. Proceeds from the event will support the Genocide Intervention Network. An e-mail will be sent for signing up to work at an HRRC table, with the new Bias /Hate Crime brochures as handouts. Joint Meeting with Community Council Proposed Because of mission similarities between HRRC and the Edina Community Council, Member Brindle suggested a joint meeting on September 16th at 7:30 AM at the Community Center. Two small groups —one from each body —could get together to plan this meeting. The HRRC group will be Members Brindle and Brauer and the staff liaison, Susan Heiberg. Upcoming RPC Planning Meeting Announced Member Erickson reported that he would be meeting with Sharon Ming, Val Burke and Deborah Poone on April 28" to discuss plans for kicking off an invitational meeting for _this year's RPC project—creating the Partners in Care model with replication materials for other organizations. Human Services Funding Process Discussed At the beginning of May, requests for proposals for 2009 funding are sent out to providers currently being funded by the City. The proposals are to be returned during the first week of June. Val Burke and Joyce Repya will be contacted to learn of any additional providers to include in the process. The Sun Current and the HRRC website will get the word out as well. League of Minnesota Human Rights Commissions (LMHRC) Updated Member Longman reported that Dr. Ellen Kennedy will be on the agenda at the next meeting of the LMHRC in May. At this meeting, the results of the Essay Contest will be announced. Adjournment There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 9 PM. Respectfully submitted, L-S a:S�C7�f YE)A77 ts�/ Luis Bartolomei, Chair Edina Human Rights $ Relations Commission LB /sh