Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-08-19_COUNCIL MEETINGAGENDA EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY EDINA CITY COUNCIL AUGUST 19, 2008 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL ADOPTION OF CONSENT AGENDA Adoption of the Consent Agenda is made by the Commissioners as to HRA items and by the Council Members as to Council items. All agenda items marked with an asterisk ( *) in bold print are Consent Agenda items and are considered routine and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of such items unless a Commissioner, Council Member or citizen so requests it. In such cases the item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered in its normal sequence on the Agenda. EDINA HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF HRA - Regular Meeting of August 4, 2008 * II. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS as per Pre -List dated August 7, 2008 TOTAL $780.56; and as per Pre -List dated August 14, 2008, $1,803.75 III. ADJOURNMENT EDINA CITY COUNCIL Constitution Week Proclaimed — September 17 — 23, 2008 * I. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Regular Meeting of August 4, 2008 and Work Session of August 4, 2008 II. PUBLIC HEARINGS During "Public Hearings," the Mayor will ask for public testimony after City staff members make their presentations. If you wish to testify on the topic, you are welcome to do so as long as your testimony is relevant to the discussion. To ensure faimess to all speakers and to allow the efficient conduct of a public hearing, speakers must observe the following guidelines: • Individuals must limit their testimony to three minutes. The Mayor may modify times, as deemed necessary. • Try not to repeat remarks or points of view made by prior speakers and limit testimony to the matter under consideration. • In order to maintain a respectful environment for all those in attendance, the use of signs, clapping, cheering or booing or any other form of verbal or nonverbal communication is not allowed. Agenda /Edina City Council August 19, 2008 Page 2 A. PUBLIC HEARING - FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND APPEAL OF VARIANCES — 5415 70th Street West, Murphy Automotive (Favorable rollcall vote of majority Council Members present to approve) B. PUBLIC HEARING — FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FINAL REZONING AND APPPEAL OF VARIANCES — 4010 65 th Street West, Crosstown Medical (Favorable rollcal/ vote of three Council Members present to approve) C. PUBLIC HEARING — PRELIMINARY PLAT — 3510 Galleria, Westin Galleria (Favorable rollcal/ vote of majority Council Members present to approve) * D. PUBLIC HEARING — COMMERCIAL PHOTOGRAPHY PERMIT — 5500 Merritt Circle (Favorable majority vote of Council Members present to approve) — Continued to September 2, 2008 E. PUBLIC HEARING — PURCHASE OF PROPERTY & PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY RELOCATION — 7450 Metro Boulevard (Favorable majority vote of Council Members present to approve) III. PUBLIC COMMENT During "Public Comment," the City Council will invite comments from those in attendance who would like to speak about something not on tonight's agenda. Individuals must limit their comments to three minutes and cannot speak to an issue for which a public hearing was held by the Council within the last thirty days or a matter scheduled for a future hearing on a specific date. Individuals should not expect the Mayor or Council to respond to their comments. Instead, the Council might refer the matter to staff for consideration at a future meeting. IV. AWARD OF BID * A. 50th & France Decorative Lighting * B. Woodland Circle, Woodland Lane, & Woodend Drive Neighborhood Sewer, Water & Street Reconstruction — Contract Nos. ENG 08 -12 & ENG 08 -13 * C. Edinborough Park Fire Alarm Replacement — Contract No. 08 -8PK V. REPORTS /RECOMMENDATIONS (Favorable vote of majority Council Members present to approve except where noted) A. Resolution No. 2008 -71 Accepting Various Donations (Favorable rollcal/ vote of four Council Members to approve) * B. Traffic Safety Report of 08/06/08 * C. Resolution No. 2008 -78 Authorizing Master Grant Contract With Minnesota Department of Health * D. Resolution No. 2008 -77 Calling Special Assessment Hearing (09/16/08) for 7631 Edinborough Way and #5218, for 6308 Wilryan Avenue Refuse Removal Agenda /Edina City Council August 19, 2008 Page 3 * E. One Year Extension City - Facility Garbage Collection Contract With Aspen Waste * F. Resolution No.2008 -79 Agency Agreement MnDOT Preliminary Engineering Safe Routes To School * G. Final Development Plan Agreement for 3101 & 3201 West 69th Street VI. FINANCE (Favorable rollcall vote of majority Council Members present to approve) * A. CONFIRMATION OF PAYMENT OF CLAIMS As per Pre -List dated August 7, 2008 TOTAL $734,459.62; and dated August 14, 2008 TOTAL $1,915,778.07; and Credit Card Payment from June 26, 2008 — July 26, 2008 TOTAL $6,299.68 VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND PETITIONS VIII. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMENTS IX. MANAGER'S COMMENTS X. ADJOURNMENT The City of Edina wants all residents to be comfortable being part of the public process. If you need assistance in the way of hearing amplification, an interpreter, large -print documents or something else, please call 952 - 927 -8861 72 hours in advance of the meeting. SCHEDULE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS /DATES /EVENTS Tues Aug 19 Work Session — Comprehensive Plan 5:00 P.M. Tues Aug 19 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Aug 26 Executive Session 11:00 A.M. Tues Aug 26 Study Session —2009 Budget 11:30 A.M. Tues Aug 26 Filing Opens — Edina City Council Affidavits of Candidacy - CITY CLERKS OFFICE Mon Sept 1 LABOR DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Tues Sept 2 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Sept 9 PRIMARY ELECTION DAY — POLLS OPEN 7:00 A.M. UNTIL 8:00 P.M. Tues Sept 9 Filing Closes — Edina City Council Affidavits of Candidacy 5:00 P.M. Thur Sept 11 Last Day to Withdraw Candidacy Edina City Council 5:00 P.M. Tues Sept 16 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Sept 23 Study Session — To be determined 7:00 A.M. Tues Oct 7 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Oct 21 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Oct 28 Study Session — To be determined 11:30 A.M. Mon Nov 3 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Nov 4 ELECTION DAY — POLLS OPEN 7:00 A.M. UNTIL 8:00 P.M. Thur Nov 6 Canvass of Election Returns 5:00 P.M. on Nov 11 VETERANS DAY HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed ues Nov 18 Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. Tues Nov 25 Study Session — To be determined 7:00 A.M. Thur Nov 25 THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed Fri Nov 26 DAY AFTER THANKSGIVING HOLIDAY OBSERVED — City Hall Closed COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM MAYOR'S CONFERENCE RM COUNCIL CHAMBERS CITY CLERKS OFFICE CITY CLERKS OFFICE COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COUNCIL CHAMBERS COMMUNITY ROOM MINUTES OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AUGUST 4, 2008 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Commissioners Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Chair Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion by Commissioner Swenson and seconded by Commissioner Housh approving the Consent Agenda for the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority as presented. Rolicall: Ayes: Bennett, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF JULY 15, 2008, APPROVED. Motion made by Commissioner Swenson and seconded by Commissioner Housh approving the minutes of the Regular Meeting of the Edina Housing and Redevelopment Authority from July 15, 2008. Motion carried on rollcall vote — four ayes. GRANDVIEW SQUARE DOCUMENTS APPROVED Executive Director Hughes explained Opus Corporation had submitted complete final documentation of the Grandview Square project. He said the documents included the following: 1. First Amendment to Easement Agreement to be signed by the City of Edina. This document amends the prior easement to incorporate the parking deck, which was not constructed at the time the original easement was recorded. It provides for a legal description of the parking deck and access to and use of the parking deck. 2. First Amendment to Amended and Restated Declaration of Reciprocal Easements, Covenants. Conditions and Restrictions to be signed by: City of Edina. Edina HRA and the City /County Condo Association. This document amends the prior document to provide legal descriptions for the roadways and driveways as required by the previously recorded document (they were not provided in the original document), corrects a gap in the previously recorded legal description and adds a new easement for the monument signage near the NW corner of the property. 3. Estoppel regarding Amended and Restated Declaration to be signed by the Edina HRA and City of Edina. Both the Edina HRA and the City of Edina need to execute separate Estoppel Certificates (as required by the Declaration). The Estoppel Certificates mainly require affirmation of evidence of insurance among other things (i.e. no knowledge of any default under the Declaration). The Commissioners questioned the possible impact of road closures on the Library or Senior Center with only 72 hours notice, ownership of the office building, and the Estoppel Certificate. Staff answered the questions stating the office building had changed hands since being built, that the road with the potential for closure was the perimeter roadway and not the main access to the Senior Center or Library, and that the Estoppel Certificate was cleaning up descriptions. Commissioner Bennett made a motion to approve: First Amendment to Easement Agreement to be signed by the City of Edina; First Amendment to Amended and Restated Declaration of Reciprocal Easements, Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions to be signed Minutes /Edina Edina Housing & Redevelopment Authority /August 4. 2008 by the City of Edina, Edina HRA and the City /County Condo Association and Estoppel regarding Amended and Restated Declaration to be signed by the Edina HRA and City of Edina. Commissioner Housh seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland. Motion carried. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Commissioner Swenson and seconded by Commissioner Housh approving the payment of claims dated July 17, 2008; TOTAL $47,376.00. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. There being no further business on the HRA Agenda, the Chair declared the meeting adjourned at 7:16 p.m. Executive Director i R55CKREG X10000 CITY 01 8/61.' 7:43:28 Council Check Register Page - 1 8/7/2008 --8/7/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation = PO # Doc No , Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit _ 14007 - 8/712008 101350_ GREEN ACRES`SPRINKLER CO. 780.56 SPRINKLER REPAIR 191899 082414 9132.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAKE TAX DISTRICT 780.56 780.56 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals i Check Total 780.56 I Total Payments 780.56 i R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company 09000 HRA FUND Amount 780.56 Report Totals 780.56 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Summary 8/7/2008 - 8/7/2008 We confirm to the best of our bxWedge and belief, that these claims comply In ail material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing poi 1 and procedures date —. � �T) 9' 816 /2008 7:43:31 Page - 1 R55CI<RE( -' 320000 CITY NA 8 °" ^3 8:33:38 Council Check Register Page - 1 8114/2008 8114/2008 Check N Data Amount Supplier / Explanation_ PO N Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 14008 811412008 100049 EHLERS $ ASSOCIATES INC 138.75 PAYGO CALCULATIONS 192523 337766 9134.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GRANDVIEW TAX DISTRICT 832.50 TIF REPORTS 192524 337767 9134.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GRANDVIEW TAX DISTRICT 832.50 TIF REPORTS 192524 337767 9132.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENTENNIAL LAKE TAX DISTRICT 1,803,75 1,803.75 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals _- Check Total 1,803.75 Total Payments 1,803.75 R55CI<SUM LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/1312008 8:33:43 Council Check Summary Page - 1 8/14/2008 - 8/1412008 Company Amount 09000 HRA FUND 1,803.75 Report Totals 1,803.75 We Cmftrm to the best Of our k10 &dge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respect@ with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing policies and procedures NA, o r a rl , Cn PROCLAMATION CONSTITUTION WEEK WHEREAS, it is the privilege of all Americans to commemorate the two hundred twentieth anniversary of the drafting of the Constitution of the United States of America with appropriate ceremonies and activities; and WHEREAS, Public Law 915 guarantees the issuance of a proclamation by the President of the United States of America, designating September 17 through 23 as Constitution Week. THEREFORE, I James B. Hovland, by virtue of the authority vested in me as Mayor of the City of Edina do hereby proclaim the week of September 17 through 23 as CONSTITUTION WEEK and urge all citizens to study the Constitution and reflect on the privilege of being an American with all the rights and responsibilities which that privilege involves. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set by hand and caused the Seal of the City of Edina to be affixed this 19th day of August in the year of our Lord two thousand eight. James B. Hovland, Mayor 7 MINUTES OF THE WORK SESSION OF THE EDINA CITY.COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL AUGU$T 4, 2008 . 5:00 P.M. Mayor. Hovland called the meeting to order at 5:10 p.m. in the Community Room of City Hall. Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Housh, Masica,,, Swenson. and Mayor Hovland. Staff present included: Gordon Hughes, City Manager; Heather Worthington, Assistant City Manager; Cary Teague, Director of Planning; and Debra Mangen, City Clerk. Mayor Hovland said the purpose of the study session was to, continue review of the Land Use chapter of the Draft Comprehensive Plan Update 2008. Member Masica commented that she would not be at the September 2, 2008, Council meetings. Staff recapped the results of the July 22, 2008, work session dealing with the greater Southdale area of the city. The Council finished their discussion of appropriate heights in the area and. staff recorded the suggested heights. Some items from the discussion included: the ability to maintain the vibrancy of the area, potential future ownership of Southdale, community vision for Edina did not .embrace height, traffic congestion, and differing heights of individual stories effect on the overall height of the building, desire to maintain or increase green. space, and the desire to encourage pedestrian friendly redevelopment if possible. After concluding their discussion of the greater Southdale area, the Council next began the review of the France corridor north of Trunk Highway 62. Discussion included the regional medical district, FAR in the regional medical district, the office residential district in this area and. scheduling of future work sessions on the Comprehensive Plan. Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at approximately 6:50 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Debra Mangen, City- Clerk r i KF;YUK'1 %1,(LC L)MMENUA11VN To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item II. A. Consent From: Cary Teague Planning Director Information Only Date: August 19, 2008 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Final Development Plan with variances for an automobile Action ® Motion repair center at 5415 70th Street West for Murphy ® Resolution Automotive. (See location on pages Al -A3) 1-1 Ordinance Discussion Deadline for a city decision: Sept. 16, 2008 Planning Commission Recommendation On a 4 -3 vote, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the request subject to the conditions on page 5 of this report. (See minutes on pages A34 -A41.) They also recommended that the Council authorize the Planning Commission to consider a code amendment regarding lot size and separation to residential districts. Zoning Board of Appeals On a 3 -0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals approval of the request. (See minutes on pages A32 -A33.) Staff Recommended Action Approve the final development plan, subject to the conditions listed on page 5 of this report. Inf ormation/Background The applicant is proposing to tear down the exisitng gas and repair station to build a one - story, 8,863 square foot automobile repair center with a car wash at 5415 70th Street West. (See the attached narrative and plans on pages A4 -A26.) The building would be made of stucco with brick accents. (See renderings on pages Al2 -A19.) The request requires a Final Development Plan with the following variances: A minimum lot size variance from 50,000 square feet to 34,517 square feet to allow nine service bays on site. 2. A setback variance from a residential area from 110 feet to 75 feet. Primary Issue • Is the proposed site redevelopment reasonable for this site? Yes. Staff believes the proposal is reasonable for five reasons: 1. The proposed automobile service center is a permitted use in the PCD-4, Planned Commercial District. 2. With the exception of the variances, the proposed addition would meet all Zoning Ordinance requirements. See pages 7 -10 within the supporting information of this report. 3. The use is similar to the existing use of the site which is a gas and auto repair station. 4. The plan would provide adequate parking spaces. Based on the uses within the proposed building, 39 spaces are required. The site plan shows 39 spaces would be provided, therefore meets the code requirement. 5. The proposed variances are reasonable and would meet the variance criteria. Per Section 850.04.Subd.1.F. of the zoning ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue hardship. The following are the variance standards, when applying the three hardship tests: a. Are there practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements? Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. Staff believes that the requested variances are reasonable. The hardship in this instance is caused by the existing location of the site adjacent to multi- family residential homes across 70th Street. The existing gas and repair station has existed with this same setback. In regard to the lot size variance, staff believes this variance is reasonable. The proposed building is well within the FAR requirement of 30 %. The proposed FAR is 26 %, and does not require any setback variances and adequate parking would be provided. Also, two previous Murphy automobile repair stations received similar minimum lot size variances, as demonstrated below: MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA CITY COUNCIL HELD AT CITY HALL AUGUST 4, 2008 7:00 P.M. ROLLCALL Answering rollcall were Members Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson and Mayor Hovland. CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS APPROVED Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Housh to approve the Council Consent Agenda as revised with the exceptions of Agenda Item IV.C. Imp. No. S -048, Contract Eng No. 08 -11 Sidewalk Highway 100 West Frontage Road, and Agenda Item V.G.3. Set Hearing Date (08/19/08), Preliminary Plat, 3510 Galleria, Westin Galleria. Rollcall: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. ICMA "NEXT BIG GIG" VIDEO CONTEST AWARD PRESENTED Communications Director Bennerotte explained the ICMA contest to highlight a career in local government. She reported that first place was awarded to Patrick Smith for his "A Job That Makes A Difference" video. Third place was awarded to Brian Smith for his "Why Local Government Management Is Right For You" video. Both videos were played, and Mayor Hovland presented Patrick Smith with his award. 2008 IMAGES OF EDINA PHOTO CONTEST PRESENTED Communications Coordinator Doll explained the Images of Edina photo contest and named the 200 winners for each category as follows: "Claude Sigmund and Students" by Jolene Goldade, which won the "Learning" Category; "Flight of the Egret" by Denis Plaster, which won the "Living" category; "Family Fun" by Arlene Green, which won the "Raising Families" category; "Ice Cream Store Delight," by Frannie Kuhs, which won the "Doing Business" category; "Spiral at the Park," by Jenna Klein, which was awarded the "Judges Choice" award; "Speed Racer," by Marni Kirchmaier, which was awarded the "Staff Choice" award; and, "Ice Cream Store Delight," by Frannie Kuhs, "Best of Show" award. Mayor Hovland presented the contest winners with their awards. 2008 STATE CHAMPION BOYS TENNIS TEAM COMMENDED Mayor Hovland congratulated the 2008 Edina Boys Tennis Team on their winning season and State Championship. Member Masica made a motion, seconded by Member Housh adopting Resolution No. 2008 -67 commending the 2008 Edina Boys Tennis Team on their 2008 Classic Lake Conference, Section and State Championships. Ayes: Bennett, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. 2008 STATE CHAMPION BOYS SWIMMING & DIVING TEAM COMMENDED Mayor Hovland congratulated the 2008 Edina Boys Swimming & Diving Team on their winning season and State Championship. Member Masica made a motion, seconded by Member Housh adopting Resolution No. 2008 -68 commending the 2008 Edina Boys Swimming & Diving Team on their State Championship. Ayes: Bennett, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *APPROVED MINUTES - REGULAR MEETING OF JULY 15, 2008, AND WORK SESSION OF JULY 15, 2008, AND STUDY SESSION OF JULY 22, 2008 Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Housh to approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of July 15, 2008, Work Session of July 15, 2008, and Study Session of July 22, 2008. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. Page 1 Minutes /Edina City Council /August 4, 2008 *PUBLIC HEARING CONTINUED TO SEPTEMBER 2, 2008, REVISED FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN 7300 BUSH LAKE ROAD, MIKE PALM, RINK PROPERTIES, LLC Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Housh to continue action on revised final development plan for 7300 Bush Lake Road, Mike Palm, Rink Properties LLC to September 2, 2008. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. PUBLIC HEARING — APPROVED NEW ON-SALE INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSE MCCORMICK & SCHMICK SEAFOOD RESTAURANT Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Manager Hughes explained that McCormick & Schmick Seafood Restaurant, to be located at 3203 Galleria in the new Westin Hotel, applied for new on -sale intoxicating and Sunday Sale liquor licenses. McCormick & Schmick have filed all necessary paperwork and paid the applicable fees for the licenses. Mr. Hughes said the licenses have been reviewed by the City's Administration, Health, Planning and Police Departments and have been found to be in order. He reported the Police background check indicated no negative findings. It was noted the grand opening was August 21, 2008. Public Testimony Edward Munson, representing McCormick & Schmick Seafood Restaurant, introduced himself as well as General Manager of the Edina location Mike Herstine and Regional Manager Kevin Finegold. Mr. Herstine commented on the restaurant's operations, size, and features, noting this restaurant and Westin Hotel would bring approximately 350 jobs to Edina. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Masica, to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Masica made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to approve New On -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License and Sunday On -Sale Liquor License to McCormick & Schmick Restaurant Corp dba McCormick & Schmick Seafood Restaurant, for the period beginning August 4, 2008 and ending March 31, 2009. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENT No one appeared., AWARD OF BID EDINBOROUGH PARK POOL VENTILATION UPGRADE Edinborough Park Assistant Manager Miller reviewed the scope of the upgrade to replace the current 21- year -old system that was in danger of failing with a new ventilation system for the swimming pool at Edinborough Park. Staff had researched this upgrade for over a year and found an energy saving unit. It was staff's recommendation to award the low base bid of $312,000 to Master Mechanical Incorporated with the understanding that the City would implement a $25,000 deduct change order to eliminate the 3 -year warranty from the equipment manufacturer. Professional engineering fees would be $18,000 for this project, which brings the total project cost to a total of $305,000.00. Ms. Miller advised that if this upgrade was approved, the project would be $28,000 over budget. The budget overage would be covered by the Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Park Trust Fund balance that currently had a balance of just over $4 million. Kyle Simonson, Hallberg Engineering, responded to the Council's questions about the operation of the new equipment that used 20 to 30 -year old energy recovery technology. He also advised of Page 2 Minutes /Edina City Council /August 4, 2008 other projects that used this system, estimating it would be a 25 to 35 -year system for Edina and result in lower electric costs and humidity levels at the pool. Member Masica requested staff provide the specific amount to be saved on electric costs. The Council discussed the impact to pool ticket admissions during the two -week shutdown, noting it will be minimal. It was also noted that rebidding this project would result in bids that would be about the same because the higher cost was for a state -of- the -art system. Following discussion, Member Masica made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, to award the bid for Edinborough Park Pool ventilation upgrade to the recommended low bidder, Master Mechanical, Inc. at $312,000. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *AWARD OF BID CONTRACT NO. PW08 -6 SEWER TELEVISION INSPECTION SYSTEM Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Housh to award Contract No. PW08 -6, Sewer Television Inspection System to the recommended low bidder, Aries Industries, Inc., at $124,978. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. AWARD OF BID IMP. NO. S -048, CONTRACT ENG NO. 08 -11 SIDEWALK HIGHWAY 100 WEST FRONTAGE ROAD Engineer /Public Works Director Wayne Houle reviewed the cost of the bituminous trailway and funding that was within the Capital Improvement Plan. Mr. Houle noted State Aid Funds would partially fund this six -foot wide walkway project. It was anticipated this first phase of construction would be completed in the fall of 2008. Member Masica made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, to award the Bid for Improvement No. S -048, Contract Eng. No. 08 -11, Sidewalk Highway 100 West Frontage Road to the recommended low bidder, DMJ Corporation, at $145,157. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *AWARD OF BID PAMELA PARK SOCCER/FOOTBALL FIELD LIGHTING PROJECT Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Housh to award the bid for Pamela Park soccer /football field lighting project to the recommended low bidder, Gunnar Electric Company, Inc., at $71,900. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *AWARD OF BID 50TH & FRANCE SURFACE PARKING LOT MILL S OVERLAY Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Housh to award the bid for 50th and France surface parking lot mill and overlay to the recommended low bidder, Ace Blacktop Inc., at $25,200. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. RECEIVED HENNEPIN COUNTY 4TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT UPDATE Chief Judge Jim Swenson updated the Council on the court's recent activities and tremendous impact of budget cuts since over 90 percent of their budget was staff. He also advised of innovative initiatives for DWI repeat offenders, mental health court, and modifications to the drug court that have been successful. Chief Judge Swenson answered questions of the Council and complimented the City's Prosecutor, Patrick Leach, for his work on behalf of Edina. *RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -70 APPROVED APPOINTING PRIMARY ELECTION JUDGES Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Housh to adopt Resolution No. 2008- 70 appointing primary election judges. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. Page 3 Minutes /Edina City Council /August 4, 2008 *SET DATE FOR CANVASS OF GENERAL ELECTION RETURNS ON NOVEMBER 6. 2008 Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Housh to set November 6, 2008, for canvass of general election returns. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. APPOINTMENT TO TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION FROM BIKE EDINA TASK FORCE Mr. Hughes presented the recommendation from the Bike Edina Task Force to appoint Jennifer Janovy to serve on the Transportation Commission. Member Masica made a motion, seconded by Member Bennett, to appoint Jennifer Janovy to serve on the Transportation Commission. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -69 ACCEPTING VARIOUS DONATIONS Mayor Hovland explained that in order to comply with State Statutes; all donations to the City must be adopted by. Resolution and approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donations. Member Swenson introduced Resolution No. 2008 -69 accepting various donations. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *APPROVAL OF VARIOUS DOCUMENTS — GRANDVIEW SQUARE Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Housh to authorize execution of documents submitted by Opus Corporation to complete final documentation of the Grandview Square project. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *SET HEARING DATE OF AUGUST 19, 2008 FOR PLANNING ITEMS Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Housh to set August 19, 2008, as the hearing date for: 1) Final Development Plan, 5415 70'' Street West, Murphy Automotive; and, 2) Final Development Plan And Final Rezoning, 4010 65th Street West, Crosstown Medical. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. SET HEARING DATE OF AUGUST 19, 2008 FOR PLANNING ITEM Planning Director Teague explained the Westin Galleria plat would establish lot lines on the existing Westin project for the restaurant and individual condos. Member Masica made a motion, seconded by Member Housh to set August 19, 2008, as the hearing date for Preliminary Plat, 3510 Galleria, Westin Galleria. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. *APPROVED ALLIED WASTE RECYCLING CONTRACT — ONE -YEAR EXTENSION Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Housh to approve a one -year extension of the Allied Waste Recycling contract. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. *RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -74 APPROVING SAFE & SOBER GRANT Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Housh to adopt Resolution No. 2008 -74 approving Safe and Sober Grant. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /August 4, 2008 "APPROVED CONSENT TO ENCROACHMENT — 4924 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Housh to authorize execution of Consent to Encroachment at 4924 France Avenue South. Motion carried on rollcall vote — five ayes. APPROVED LETTER OF INTENT / SET HEARING DATE OF AUGUST 19 2008 FOR 7450 METRO BOULEVARD Mr. Hughes explained this was a follow up to direction from the July 15, 2008, meeting for staff to commence negotiations with ConAgra with respect to the City's potential acquisition of 7450 Metro Boulevard for a new Public Works facility. He reported that he and Jack Rice held discussions with ConAgra representatives resulting in the non - binding letter of intent before the Council. Mr. Hughes suggested if the Council were amenable that authorization be granted to sign the letter of intent and a public hearing be scheduled on August 19, 2008. The letter of intent would serve as the basis for a formal purchase agreement that the Council would consider at a later date. Mr. Hughes presented the anticipated schedule that could be followed through preparation and approval of a purchase agreement, calling for a bond sale, selling $14 million general obligation capital improvement bonds, and closing on the purchase from ConAgra on November 1 or earlier. If approved, the concept was to issue $14 million in general obligation CIP bonds to finance the acquisition of the property ($8 million) and fund the initial renovation costs of the ConAgra building. There would be a supplementary issue of lease revenue bonds (similar to those issued for the gyms and City Hall) to fund the balance of the renovation costs that would be issued at a later date when these costs were better defined. Mr. Hughes presented details of the letter of intent and purchase agreement. The Council discussion included: the length of time available to perform due diligence, the assessed valuation, and difficulty of determining value on the property; potential for new negotiations to be opened should mitigation costs go beyond $100,000, noting the desire for closing costs to be negotiated in the City's favor, and question whether the environmental assessments had been completed. Jack Rice, 4801 Hilltop Lane, stated the environmental issues would be the same with any buyer so he believed ConAgra would resolve the issue. He stated real estate transactions were rarely negotiated at the assessed value but the assessed was always considered as one piece of the information in the negotiation. Mr. Rice stated he believed both parties have a unique interest in the property. Attorney Knutson commented on the need to comply with the confidentiality aspects required by the Government Data Practices Act, which may limit the scope of any confidentiality agreement entered into by the City by requiring that certain data be public. The Council indicated their desire to move forward with the letter of intent and to schedule a public hearing. Member Swenson made a motion, seconded by Member Housh, to authorize execution of the letter of intent as revised, for the acquisition of 7450 Metro Boulevard and setting August 19, 2008, as the hearing date for consideration of this acquisition. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. APPROVED CONSIDERATION OF A CHANGE TO THE BUILDING ELEVATION FOR THE APARTMENT BUILDING AT 3101 69TIl STREET WEST Mr. Teague explained that Robb Miller, on behalf of TE Miller Development was requesting consideration of an amended building elevation for their recently approved apartment building at the corner of 69th Street and Xerxes. He displayed the exterior elevation of the building as approved, noting that a second stairwell had now been added to the roof to comply with a building code requirement that two entrance /exits must exist on the roof. Additionally, window locations have been slightly altered. Mr. Teague asked whether these changes were significant enough to require an additional public hearing. If so, staff would recommend that the Council set a public hearing for August 19, 2008. Page 5 Minutes /Edina City Council /August 4, 2008 The City Council confirmed that the building materials must remain the same. Council reviewed Zoning Code .language defining review thresholds that can be approved by the City Planner or require another public hearing and review by the Council. Rob Miller, TE Miller Development, LLC, 7760 France Avenue, applicant, indicated there had been minor adjustments with window placement to coordinate with the unit play layouts, a stairwell access point to the roof was.added to meet the Building Code requirement, and windows adjacent to the patio doors were added to allow more light into the units. Mr. Miller stated there were no materials changed and requested approval be made conditioned on the same materials being used as previously approved by the Council. It was clarified that all previous conditions still applied to the project and if the building materials have changed, the project must come back for Council consideration. Member Masica made a motion, seconded by Member Swenson, to approve an amended building elevation for the apartment building at 3101 69th Street West, as requested. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. APPROVAL STANDARDS — FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT Mr. Teague presented and explained the recommended changes to applications for conditional use permits and final development plans. He explained that applicants would be put on notice that changes to plans would require public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council It was noted that such a public hearing requirement before the Planning Commission and City Council could be an eight -week process. The Council discussion included the need for flexibility in the planning process, while maintaining integrity of the approvals. Staff pointed out the revised applications were an attempt to amplify the notice to applicants that they should have their projects much further along the design development process before gaining approvals without necessitating a second round of hearings and reviews. Council consensus was reached to authorize staff to modify the application forms for final development plans and conditional use permits, as requested, to support a larger degree of scrutiny of plans and changes made between approval and the building permit issuance, and to place the onus on the developer to provide a list of any changes between schematic design and design development, with staff feedback on this process provided to the Council in four to six months. *CONFIRMATION OF CLAIMS PAID Motion made by Member Swenson and seconded by Member Housh approving payment of the following claims as shown in detail on the Check Register dated July 17, 2008, and consisting of 36 pages; General Fund $286,596.52; Communications Fund $9,131.51; Working Capital Fund $98,901.26; Construction Fund $11,589.51; Art Center Fund $6,915.36; Golf Dome Fund $2,520.21; Aquatic Center Fund $5,606.71; Golf Course Fund $55,881.63; Ice Arena Fund $7,897.31; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $11,043.13; Liquor Fund $192,464.93; Utility Fund $143,105.87; Storm Sewer Fund $12,412.81; Recycling Fund $35,380.00; PSTF Agency Fund $150.93; TOTAL $879,597.69, and for approval of payment of claims dated July 24, 2008, and consisting of 34 pages: General Fund $391,891.05; CDBG Fund $23,831.36; Communications Fund $1,322.95; Working Capital Fund $699,562.72; Construction Fund $13,228.43; Art Center Fund $1,861.70; Golf Dome Fund $1,845.80; Aquatic Center Fund $29,109.83; Golf Course Fund $42,175.11; Ice Arena Fund $6,087.69; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $25,327.11; Liquor Fund $144,510.23; Utility Fund $1,152,232.83; Storm Sewer Fund $395,529.91; PSTF Agency Fund; $4,021.07; TOTAL $2,932,537.79, and for approval of payment of claims dated July 31, 2008, and consisting of 36 pages: General Fund $500,244.42; Communications Fund $12,878.52; Page 6 M- inutes /Edina Citv Council /Auciust 4. 2008 Working Capital Fund $16,018.73; Art Center Fund $21,859.11; Golf Dome Fund $125.83; Aquatic Center Fund $6,139.41; Golf Course Fund $33,390.50; Ice Arena Fund $347.25; Edinborough /Centennial Lakes Fund $26,811.50; Liquor Fund $239,050.15; Utility Fund $81,067.46; Storm Sewer Fund $5,258.05; PSTF Agency Fund $2,692.29; TOTAL $945.883.22. Motion carried'on rollcall vote — five ayes. REVENUE.,BONDS AND RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -73 SERIES10086 SELLING 47,756,000 G.O. PERMANENT IMPROVEMENT' REVOLVING FUND' BONDS Finance Director, Wallin introduced Jonathan North': +Ehlers & Associates, the City's Bond Counsel. Mr. North explained .the impact to the municipal bond market caused by the downturn in the subprime and housing markets. He congratulated Edina for having a firm AAA rating from Moody's and S & P, which, positioned the City favorably in ,the market. He presented the - results of the four Series 2008A bids received, advising the winning bid was very favorable and received from Piper Jaffrey for 3.6115. percent. Six bids.were received for the Series 2008B bonds, with the winning bid from Piper Jaffrey for 3.74+ percent, again. very favorable. Mr. North referenced the summary of updated debt service schedules, updated amortization schedules for the 2008A and 2008B bond series, and 25 -year history of the bond buyer. The Council discussed that S&P had previously rated Edina's financial management system as "good" and had recently upgraded the rating to "strong." Edina was also one of fewer than 20 cities of its size with an AAA bond rating. Because of the lower than expected interest rates received, the special assessment interest rate would be lowered to 5.74 percent. The lower borrowing costs could also impact utility rates. Member Swenson introduced Resolution No. 2008 -72 relating to Series 2008A $13,985,000 G.O. Utility Revenue Bonds. Member Bennett seconded the motion. Roll -call vote: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried. Member Masica introduced Resolution No. 2008 -73 relating to Series 20088 $7,755,000 G.O. Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Bonds. Member Housh seconded the motion. Roll call vote: Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Motion carried.: SCHEDULE AUGUST 26, 2008 COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE EXECUTIVE SESSION Following discussion, Council consensus -was reached to schedule a Committee of the Whole Executive Session on August 26, 2008, at 11:00 a.m., in the Community Room for the purpose of evaluating -- --_City Manager,- Gordon - Hughes.- - -- -- -- - - - There being no further business on the Council Agenda, Mayor Hovland declared the meeting adjourned at 10:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Page 7 Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk f Site Address Service Bays Site Acreage Variance % Variance FAR 5100 Vernon 10 38,342 s.f. 14,400 s.f. 30% 25% 5354 France 6 20,650 s.f. 14,350 s.f. 40% 25% 5415 70th 9 34,517 s.f. 15,483 s.f. 30% 26% The 5354 France project also required several additional setback variances including: • A 0 -foot setback to residential property. (This site is adjacent to residential property on the north and west lot lines. (See pages A28 -A29.) • A building setback variance of 18 feet to allow a 7 -foot setback from the south lot line. • A 2 -foot parking setback variance. • A 7 space parking variance. The 5100 Vernon project also required several setback variances including: • A 0 -foot setback to residential property. (This site is also adjacent to residential on the north and west lot lines. (See pages A30 -A31.) . • Building setback variances of 10 and 40 feet from the required 50 foot setback from the west and north lot lines. The subject request does not require any setback variances for the building, and has a greater setback to residential property. ' The previous use on this site included three service bays and had gasoline sales. The proposed use has nine service bays and an accessory car wash with no gasoline sales. According to the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 7th Addition, and Chuck Rickart, the City's transportation consultant from WSB, the existing automobile service station with gasoline sales generates 56 PM peak hour trips. The proposed automobile service station with a car wash would generate 47 PM peak hour trips. Therefore, the proposed uses would generate less traffic to the site. b. Are there circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self - created? Yes. The unique circumstance is the existing size and location of the property adjacent to residential uses. While this circumstance is not completely unique, it is not common to similarly zoned property. These conditions are not self created. These conditions are very similar to the two other Murphy Automotive sites in the City of Edina, as indicated above. This site actually has a greater setback from residential area than the other two sites. c. Would the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. The use would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The use of the site has been, and will continue to be automobile service oriented. Staff Recommendation Recommend approval of the Final Development Plan with variances for the redevelopment of 5415 70th Street West for an automobile service center. Approval is based on the following findings: 1) With the exception of the variances, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Final Development Plan. 2) The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: a. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the existing location of the lot in relation to residential property across 70th Street. b. The variances would meet the intent of the ordinance because the building is reasonably sized given the lot area. C. The lot size variance is similar to the variances granted for two other Murphy Automotive Stations within the City of Edina at 5100 Vernon and 5354 France. 3) There would be adequate parking to support the redevelopment. 4) Landscaping on the site would be improved from existing conditions. Approval of the Final Development. Plan is subject to the following conditions: I 1) Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped June 16, 2008. • Landscape plan date stamped June 16, 2008. • Building elevations date stamped May 30, 2008. • Grading plan date stamped June 16, 2008. Changes made to the building plans, including color would be subject to review and approval of a revised Final Development Plan by the Planning Commission and City Council 2) Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Permit. The city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District's requirements. 3) Hydraulic hoists, pits, lubrication, washing, repairing and diagnostic equipment shall be used and stored within a building. 4) The automotive center may not be operated between the hours of 11:00. P.M. and 6:00 A.M. 5) No merchandise shall be displayed for sale outside a building except in that area within four feet of the building. 4 6) No motor vehicles except those owned by the operators and employees of the principal use, and vehicles awaiting service, shall be parked on the lot occupied by the principal use. Vehicles being serviced may be parked for a maximum of 48 hours. 7) Body work and painting is prohibited. 8) All waste water disposal facilities, including sludge, grit removal and disposal equipment, must be approved by the city engineer prior to installation. 9) No sign may be illuminated between 10:00 pm and 7:00 am. 10) Per Section 850.10. Subd. 3.B of the City's Zoning Ordinance, a letter of credit, performance bond or cash deposit must be submitted in the amount equal to 150% of the proposed landscaping. 11) Elimination of one curb cut off Amundson Avenue, per the proposed site plan. 12) The landscape _plan must be reviewed by the city engineer to ensure proper drainage. 5 SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Multi- family residential; zoned PRD -3, and guided for multi- family residential uses. Easterly: Waldorf services; zoned and guided for commercial uses. Southerly: Retail strip center; zoned and guided for commercial uses. Westerly: Retail strip center; zoned and guided for commercial uses. Existing Site Features The subject property is 34,515 square feet in size, and contains a gas station. The site is relatively flat. Planning Guide Plan designation: Commercial Zoning: PCD -4, Planned Commercial District Final Development Plan Review Section 850.04.Subd. 2.5, requires the City Council to make the following findings for approval of a Final Development Plan: a) is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for commercial uses, and the site is zoned for automotive uses. The proposal is consistent with the existing zoning and the Comprehensive Plan. b) is consistent with the Preliminary Development Plan as approved and modified by the Council and contains the Council imposed conditions to the extent the conditions can be complied with by the Final Development Plan; A Preliminary Development Plan is only required with property that is requested to be re- zoned. Therefore, a Preliminary Development Plan is not required. c) will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract, The proposed use is similar to the use that is on the site now. The proposed new buildings would be an upgrade to the existing building and canopy on the site today. (See pictures on pages A20 -A22.) d) will not result in an overly - intensive land use, The applicant is proposing a reasonably sized structure for the lot. The floor area ratio (FAR) for the building would be 26 percent. The maximum FAR for this district is 30 6 percent. Therefore, staff believes the proposal is appropriate for this site, and would not result in an overly - intensive land use. e) will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards, The city engineer has determined that a traffic study is not necessary, as the impact to the roads would be minimal for the change of use. J) conforms to the provisions of this Section and other applicable provisions of the Code; and With the exception of the variances requested, the proposal conforms to the Zoning Ordinance. g) provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features. Staff believes the proposal would meet this criterion. Standards for Automobile Service Centers a) Minimum lot area. For an automobile service center, 20,000 square feet, plus 5,000 square feet for each service bay in excess of three. The new building would have nine service bays; therefore, the minimum lot size would be 50,000 square feet. The subject property is 34,517 square feet in size, therefore a variance is requested. Staff supports the variance as the building meets the FAR requirement, no setback variances are needed, and the variance is similar to the variances granted to two other Murphy Automotive sites within the City of Edina. b). Hydraulic hoists, pits, lubrication, washing, repairing and diagnostic equipment shall be used and stored within a building. These activities would take place within the building. c) No automobile service station on a lot adjoining a lot in a residential district shall be operated between the hours of 11:00 P.M. and 6:00 A.M. This would be made a condition of any approval. d) No merchandise shall be displayed for sale outside a building except in that area within four feet of the building or within pump islands used for dispensing motor fuels. This would be made a condition of approval. There would be no pump islands for dispensing of motor fuels. e) No motor vehicles except those owned by the operators and employees of the principal use, and vehicles awaiting service, shall be parked on the lot occupied by the principal use. Vehicles being serviced may be parked for a maximum of 48 hours. This would be made a condition of approval. J) Body work and painting is prohibited. This would be made a condition of approval. r g) No buildings, driveway surfaces, parking areas or other improvements shall be located within 110 feet of any portion of a lot in a residential district which is used for residential purposes if separated from the lot by a street, or within 50 feet if not so separated by a street. The subject property is located within 110 feet of residential property; therefore, a variance is requested. This is an existing nonconforming use, as the current gas station does not meet this requirement. h) Notwithstanding the requirements of Subsection 850.08, driveways and drive aisles need only provide a setback of not more than five feet from all lot lines. The proposal meets the five foot setback requirement. Car Wash Standards a) All waste water disposal facilities, including sludge, grit removal and disposal equipment, must be approved by the Engineer prior to installation. This would also be made a condition of approval. The plans would be reviewed and approve by the city engineer, prior to issuance of a building permit. b) Not more than one point of ingress and one point of egress shall be allowed from any one public street to the car wash. This standard would be met with the elimination of one of the access points off of Amundson Avenue. (See page A6.) Grading/Drainage,/Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed grading and drainage plans and found them to be acceptable. A permit would be required from the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District. (See memo on page A27.) Building Design The addition would be constructed of stucco with accent brick. (See pages Al2 -A19.) The building would be an improvement over the existing structure on site. The trash enclosure would be a rock face block concrete wall with a cedar gate. Landscaping There are seven mature pine trees on the site that would remain. Based on the perimeter of the site, 19 mature trees are required. The applicant is proposing to plant 13 additional overstory trees, along with understory shrubs along the lot lines. (See pages A8 -A9.) The existing trees are included in the number of trees required. Therefore, the existing and proposed landscaping would conform to the City regulations for landscaping. The existing site has 20% green space; the proposed redeveloped site would have 17% green space. Despite the loss in green space there would be an increase in vegetation. Compliance Table * Variance Requested City Standard Proposed Front 35 feet 47 feet Side Street 35 feet 42 feet Side No setback requirement 9 feet Rear No setback requirement 48 feet Setback from 110 feet *75 feet Residential Area Building Height One Story One Story Floor Area Ratio 30% 26% (8,863 s.f. building on a 34,517 s.f. lot) Minimum Lot Area 50,000 s.f. *34,517 s.f. Parking lot and drive 5 feet (street) 5 feet aisle setback 5 feet (side & rear) 5 feet Stacking space for 10 feet 10 feet car wash setback Stacking spaces for 2 per bay 2 per bay car wash Parking Stalls One space per employee on a major shift (10 10 stalls employees) Three spaces per service bay (9 bays) 27 stalls Accessory Car Wash (2 spaces) 2 stalls 39 stalls total 39 stalls Over -story Trees 19 required 20 trees (Includes 7 (number is based on the perimeter of the site) large Pine Trees on the south lot line) * Variance Requested RESOLUTION NO. 2008-75 APPROVING A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH VARINACES AT 5415 70TH STREET City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the,City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND: 1.01 Murphy Automotive is requesting a Final Development Pl'an.review with the following Variances at 5415.70th Street: - 1. A minimum lot size variance from 50,000 square feet to 34,517'square feet to allow nine service bays on site. 2. A setback variance from a residential area from 110 feet to 75 feet. 102 The applicant is proposing to tear down the exisitng gas and repair station to build a one - story, 8,863 square foot automobile repair center with a car wash 1.03 July 30, 2008, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Final Development I _ Plan and Variances on a vote of 4-3. 1.04 August 7, 2008, the Zoning Board of Appeals unanimously approved the variances. Staff appealed the decision in order for the City Council to take final action on the Final Development Plan and Variance. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 Approval is based on the following findings: 1) With the exception of the variance, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Final Development Plan. 2) The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: a. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the existing location of the lot in - --- relation to- residential - property- across- 70th: Street: - - - — -- - - - -- b. The variances would meet the intent of the ordinance because the building is reasonably sized given the lot area. C. The lot size variance is similar to the variances granted for two other Murphy. Automotive,Stations within the City of Edina at5100 Vernon and 5354 France. 3) There. would, be adequate parking to support the redevelopment. City l aU) Landscaping on the site would be improved from existing conditions. 952 -927 -8861 4801 WEST 50TH STREET FAX 952 - 826 -0390 EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 WWW.cityofedina.com TTY 952 - 826 - 0379.. ti, RESOLUTION NO. 2008-75 /I- Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Final Development Plan with Variances for Murphy Automotive. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: 1) Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped June 16, 2008. • Landscape plan date stamped June 16, 2008. • Building elevations date stamped May 30, 2008. • Grading plan date stamped June 16, 2008. Changes made to the building plans, including color would be subject to review and approval of a revised Final Development Plan by the Planning Commission and City Council 2) Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Permit. The city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District's requirements. 3) Hydraulic hoists, pits, lubrication, washing, repairing and diagnostic equipment shall be used and stored within a building. 4) The automotive center may not be operated between the hours of 11:00 P.M. and 6:00 A.M. 5) No merchandise shall be displayed for sale outside a building except in that area within four feet of the building. 6) No motor vehicles except those owned by the operators and employees of the principal use, and vehicles awaiting service, shall be parked on the lot occupied by the principal use. Vehicles being serviced may be parked for a maximum of 48 hours. 7) Body work and painting is prohibited. 8) All waste water disposal facilities, including sludge, grit removal and disposal equipment, must be approved by the city engineer prior to installation. 9) No sign may be illuminated between 10:00 pm and 7:00 am. RESOLUTION NO. 2008-75 10) Per Section 850.10. Subd. 3.B of the City's Zoning Ordinance, a letter of credit, performance bond or cash deposit must be submitted in the amount equal to .150% of the proposed landscaping. 11. Elimination of one curb cut off Amundson Avenue, per the proposed site plan. 12. The landscape plan must be reviewed by the city engineer -to ensure proper drainage. Adopted by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on August 19, 2008. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK 1, the undersigned duly appointed and acting .City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 19, 2008, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 2008. City of Edina 6op4 / 6901 24 6901 / i 6903 J 5408 5406 X12 Legend N.... Number Labels: Str!!t Nam. L.belc 6908 3670 City llmim /' Cr!!kc 69ti y 6917 5400 5107 5104 5221 Li kt Namli 6916 civ�rtOAYLN 5417 �+ �1 0Me�6 \` ekes Parke D Parcels 6920 5426 5124 5472 5470 517d , 3116 � 11 5526 SSi1 5510 5506 5507 5177 24 i.-- -y—•�� ` 24 5470 T07M y7W 5476 v 5515 5517 5579 Z( 5400 � 71 74` 5519 f� r 55rA7 rn�55,15305 � SJ/1 /uJ5 3701 700, 5557 \ 552755195515 f f J J 7 54i5 5712 5310 74 ViJ.A OE 011 1575 331} � _ 0 5530 5579 �5531 SSJ, 3571 SSJJ 55J6 55.75 5577 7011 7075 7073 ZI � 7014 701(%70% —I 7057 70Ji 7074 1-127 7056 °b 5549 5517 $513 S$4, 5579 71� 7060 7064 7079 rn ]ose � ]oad � 799 {:7696 7076 70dd 7 1 1 1 1 7104 5506 3%5 ® 7705 mrW� �c. _JG6 C4 all! 2 :1A ,1� 4 ? � PID:0811621110005 j %[>r p e Y 5415 70th St W ��,�,,, . , O �. �. Edina, MN 55439 L � - w ; 1001 f nor ,I A3 City of Edina Logend `� •' /; 6903 SLOB 5106 1 - HDYSe Number Labels Street Name VDeIP �` »» ` 697_ _ -� 6909 I L� . Si10 ^f City Limits r JY •.. Al Creeks 967! 6917 5100 5102 66OI - - -___ N 5:z+ L Lake Names 5412 Park. vmruv -- i oP.• sNnn ; Zoning 6920 5111 / ® AP04AP1.enelepow"Dmeell 9631 S6!! "M 5916 5H6 ❑ rpD +lrue De..rP.r�+Dmm+� f ' ssls ss21 N /• t 1 1�. ■ ® rOO -S lr.�e Dw.eP.+mnl0anq -l1 rDD4 1risE D�— Dm�mil Du1D ss96 ss92 su! :.,4 ❑ ■ �p -, IPmnnen enna„�1pmm -„ N I Ilk. Pan -z iPennm cmrareiulpmm -21 707P/STN ® PCDJIPYnnm Lcmrcrc.IDeenC ->t 21 71 ® PCD +IPUnnm LRaavcv', Dmrct +l 65H b100 /� ❑ PIDIPenn®meveM0— bei6 � Pap- +iPe„nm okm pmrc -11 6571.y 5311.5312 POD- 21P.a.n.e OPO Dm.c: Zt 55)” ! .5}15 5310 ■ PRD1 IPynnec kaynn Dmm -tl /66l7�961666} 1 ® MD- 21P.nnw Ro -°en; Dmm -Z EgMD 3IPanner Gear! pmm li 991ASEaR ® MD�IPPrnnm keaOml Dmm +1 55151171 c -- ® . PRD S M—W A-1 D— 51 PSR+IPennm Sme.Rnum R+1 0 5530 )D ?5 � 11 _ R 115m0Y0wt 9-0— 5531 SSJ ® RalDaukrrDNn7uneD.— SS M 5 � "DIRse—Mmc D.—I 553r ) !—I LJ Parcels )0� 0407036 052 )032 5519 &L7i117 S5�1SS]9 70M Mm a ,D19 low 7066 7060 70927096 1a )OIfi !1 uaaswwws cm,.e.lc�rnac�ms !105 5305 z 4 PID:0811621110005 X1.1, ° �p P 5415 70th St W �. �. Edina, MN 55439 A3 7358 West 160th Street - Lake_ ville, MN 55068 M U -RP&Phone: 952-997-3310 A u T 0 M 0 T 1 v E Fax: 952- 432 -3698 www,murpl PL140T 00OCT M E DINA CsRMDVIEW PRO TEC T1 RE SY A U TO T -I F E w,A U T 0. •nr. o:A0rr -v c 5354 France Ave. - Edina. MN 55410 .- 5100 V-n A".'- Edina. MN 55436 7358 W 160th St. - Lakeville MN 55068 952 - 92&5110 952- 929 -3115 952- 432 -2454 RE: Project proposal — 5415 70th ST W., Edina, MN 55439 CARWASH 5401 France Ave. - Edina, MN 55410 May 27, 2008 Murphy Automotive, Inc is seeking to. operate an automotive repair business on this site. We will offer repair and maintenance services for cars, SW's and light truck_ s. The type of work would include: oil changes, tine repair /replacement, brakes, exhaust, minor engine repair and tune -ups. We would also offer an automatic car wash which is used primarily as an added value for our repair customers. Customers could also purchase a car wash separately. Hours of operation would be Monday through Fridays lam. to 8pm, Saturdays Sam to 5pm and closed on Sundays. his our desire to make the automotive services we provide more convenient to the southwest Edina area. Currently this area of Edina is serviced only by the business that exists on the site which is in need of updating in technology, as well as, appearance. We will bring advanced technology and efficient automotive service, while helping to improve the aesthetics of the area. We are also working with the MPCA and the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District (NMCWD) to create a storm water storage and infiltration system that would utilize existing underground gasoline storage tanks. This storm water system would far exceed the new requirements: of NMCWD and supply naturally, soft water for the washing of cars and/or irrigation. Murphy Automotive, Inc currently operates two auto repair businesses and one gasoline convenience store in Edina and third auto repair business in Lakeville. We employ. approximately 85 people with approximately 55 of them being in Edina. - Steve- Caspers Vice President Murphy Automotive, Inc. A �,� r 0. �N ire Mw )a♦ WPer mv,n \ \ 1 1� I J m ou \ 1 \ LEGEND • bn Ymmmwl )evN • x Nell rerwre — — secret s.w. —zlerw s... w0 reraeb •rn0 evm uerrb mr0 rbenm. IbrMe no r<rdr maw w0 µwl Orr'r w. b,d ENMim EuerR Red m .m 0 s.e1Ae N.M ®reran. sv.rem f=emMweu. srnr•w — — BUrI,R Cm — —9ur60 IrepMm r-- 1 r r I' N off- mho Boundary and Topographic Survey for APPRO Development, Inc. of 5415 78th Stteef West, Edina, Minnesota NOTES Beeaq, enewr en —d an m vwmeR Rerun. ulwrw .new ew rrewr brvwrdl•r nnru,n.R qq uY� d robe. b 4 eUV eF':ry ee^Rerm � b r¢e� ER Cmhsl Emnv SIeM1 an L•I r BW- tst -I/w ry P, Miry lanrlmn !M em mmGVCWn beee•. s�.r.w•.e: ee.M Des d M ersr��rrpp r d tool ceM iavR (1rMne brarN Rul,rq d ewhel Me.) bMM � ew.b FM. e,ee d peperb t 411 Sa M1 v n.N avw ,�. (Rbma mwrm2� eeFFe_., �emnn {lee. W., RRev 0.tJ NrmrF 4Rameµ s.rNm GrRw tnWO ,v. 2 s Lw . e0. R µr ewabv not w r ue.e. rwwe m M1 sb� �s rM R,er 91M Rmebp SdF•eb ew e, /rb,e SImL w M eReRV Sbe/Hew- 1 ilrb Pe•nb b b.eM b neee Zen, Y (vem MerwµN b a avblrl, N., �minrid enue, eeeerebr) pv ibee za,. Pmnl n4 t)6SRDtetL SMmrree ), ,aRe. OJdrq en6vb, wnbq mr Rmd mw MmmfL, .bberN hvn IM alt d [JYn. veld N errdrrrreRer. d ueer4 btlrArrp e®rrerrhemyMr•ne UIt1rY SLIIEImlr Iiu urrerwrM NRAw Nmr Few bw bevr,R M1mm R,tl nm•r 11n rml 1w IM d fb Ilea esw d W 1. Kk AI,—LM maecc •re m. rm1 Iw rM r rsI d ur. raror nl.o rM r m w.a sw r tl yr ur � u. x•a,mr r rmrir R®"�R raw Ivr,m LeOlkele µ,ale/ )e®M Meb nRtt Ud Iro laird•t w0 Imrgaterk •„et ,n p,yereR q nA ury mr ar erverrm em uee I em a Rrt Unmq latl Sv.,ty w.. u. le" r M sel. d vwaww. wn.s ue tx art d rot.. mos rmmr s .asscaelES. e< n b.leM uwr ®m unw ro..tes i� :�j Rehder and Associates, Inc. LML ZNGINECRS ANa lIWO SrIRVEWRS .we: oea- tlm.om 6X15TOJ6 I CON D 17 Wis Al LO IONMG mwxc o.ux 'ueea pCo�. PLANNED CO RCIAL ORTRICT-R ,i OF O LO G ORWANCe eUlOMO eeTRACre, DATR, DL- G. ccR R qD T' ° -P �uoRD "N"AYTO ieY Cl CENTER eg b . L• °D row Au1e eeRV,ee ee.reR gpg�vilpyR�ArR4 PROV,RpAIO iIOKa wesR ra�nAP A" "�OR4Y WTrC *T ARRA - U. 61T. NAIDtN1� i000PL.°On AeeA, � - �w T"�iLa �Ber ureeeweD MAX LOT AREA COVRRRD BY —TRRR. AL - n LOOK AREA .-S ALLO— ODD A %1.101 R.P. TOTAL PLCOR AREA - OD] .41" .P. TOTAL LOT AREA eeD EuErAxD eu ran EP Cwo� xcw0es uLf RP o. BASS— V N 0 2 PARKING REQUIREMENTS: "� .�qea DATA R CARL, i —f °PAr. .� a TAC— SPACRe E24k8 F"ahe EN�e. ° °b:D}L2dSa`5 � %WVMP� %%p— OR ¢®CY"�"iR9O IP,CC0e0RlHABT�LL NLG a- L��R ?pw SO —001. PAR— CALCNLAT.. HA.. I .1..... .11. TOTAL B.P. aeac.ROe C RA.L. 11 BAA.,.. - heE B M R.TLAORTM— R B11.1 Ax° OR nAJOR I-T TOTAL 1AR[M4 ReODREO POR rr. eT C­ oenaAxee - .. O i0 . ACCl..ELl1 T w.r oN .rte, . R. n TO .. ACCR°.neo OTN.REryryP�AR— OR 6rt6 y BEPl -TT"R- ivi1X"O t "IiLU°P�"oovO°Raepr R/A T" MONUMENT SIGN n .GALS, V�' -r -O' - RECEto JUN 1 6 2066 SITE PLAN eCALe, r - Ro -O- 1. 0 oD r1 la 3 W f- > S W Ci= i o< i 3 S� rc 0 2 -f W LL U W W F U m >r N Q 00 i I o € && C3 vWi F °aW o� aU �� O. -O)OOn 5 irE PLAN 2 21 PT .10 .0- - 33 33 (2 TO BE ACCESSIBLE) 39 (2 TO BE ACCESSIBLE) PE 'ITE. LINE OF PARKPiG CONC BASE roR VACUUM STATION m bee EOM OF DaSTING KEU60ENG BUILDING D EDGE Or EXISTING PAVEMENT FOR NEIGHBORING LOT r- Ab �f m 01 BrrLmOuS ..ACE 2 STACKING SPACES AT 4 EACH LANE SHOWN US It � � 7-7 2 STACIUNEi5P SHOWN LANE - CONCRETE APRON Sn PIPE GUARDPOSTS NEW RETAMM WALL NEW CURB AT kC. CURB RAMP L. I,-cr PART— ;F NEW TRASH ENCI MIRE L-Li EXISTING NEIGHBORING P-01 FENCE ENCLOSURE APRON T INC sa-w �r CONCRETE APRON CONCRETE ADEMALK G) fo Ratio JUN 1 6 2V98 1 EXISTING STREET CURB M SIGN 9=9 DETAL THIS PAGE — UNE OF M SETBACK — LANE P OP SETBACK 0 P P ELIMINATE DRVE' AT T, � ON `NEW RZTAIXIXG WALL NORTH A -7 SITE FLAN 2 10 0 40 S 176 LAN SCAI P- 1• - 20'-0' ED 20 0 20 NEW CURB AT kC. CURB RAMP APPROACH PPROACH 4'--- 2P-V PART— STRIPING L-Li 37-0 V9, ur-v P-01 C oNCj&-TE APRON INC sa-w CONCRETE CURB AND NEW DRIVE BITMOIJS SMACE ENTRANCE Z 10 PI-G BO I 13I. O-t EXISTING DRIVE it LOCATION SHOWN D HE D `NEW RZTAIXIXG WALL NORTH A -7 SITE FLAN 2 10 0 40 S 176 LAN SCAI P- 1• - 20'-0' ED 20 0 20 PLANT MATERIAL LEGEND CONnw MAKE BOTAMAL %AM YIB /ROOT BLTL018 MOVEYL. —T =— Yom' —m LLLBD AND —IA— - PALLOOLO ABM -A—. MORA — LOOLD• ] In' eAt,.^ AYO euRUtn•eo HARE • W PLATANOR)e1 L i BALLED 1 pYRLAP O - SLAM MM1LE BPRYCa P A GLAVCA DBNBATA r x. WALLED 1 BNLLAF'PeO DPBIAA C Bp410A •GOlALA1E' .1- oATl6Y. BTeLLA OR oxo M55 M LILAC .] COxTAMeR - eCMNY GLOBE ARBOR —AR -A DCCRJBNTAUB ONTAMER Tecxxr cLOee• NOT USED BCAND�A .AMrveR AOroe1N1 ..A—A •I ... A' wiAMER TECHNY ARBORYrTAe NNJA O—D- TALl9'TECNxT' —TAMLR LANDSCAPE NOTES: OOe-- lRee. Q tma — Ore® ewmeawe OR eveRCeeeN rnee D�M,.-- - GZN *L wxinr AL L ALL onAT—CCVLe- DAREAS iNATT ARR Neppil�GF- CAAURY �DALR�LORAee nM Pw rRMDOT BBv9 AT !I AL TSATP� NOiLT! OPFIRTOCeL ALL.AWTN 1 P�RpOYpIOe¢CpLe.W STRAW MR. OP �R LLe B POR nYleYU OYeR TLR B. �/1. O 4T B TAGP RA CBLTPaY INeBT�G RLLL N01rt19 WtFA BRIC LTI ROC[ nNLCx. WRUO! HMO Or HAAL rOeOLANOOT O OBNI>�I�LOELR MLTALLED YNOLR ALL TRESS. L EALL eD011li% ARLAB TNAT ARB OBTUR... OVRMG CONBTRNLTON WR M ORO[A KRT O Da PROViwD AT ALL —ED ARBAB ON ANT OCR eRIIL'1J TO eB DI/ GRAY TRAP ROR - N• OLLPy f ]•]A °x BT�sT°A�eB YTO ea useo- mNBP aR°LLlx°oi$. e�oee nB°xBOTT°ae' eo'wLeRe pLA1r} edTB COXCRBIB a LC,LpB C L OR BABC4 TRVC u11R ROTGiT1puXNlYBTtn D M oPLRAORI RfnI nAM14 BFTERMO UNDERGRO— NTBJte1 TO 82 LOCATeO PRptl TO ART W—"ATFTL L LANOBGAPe CONTRACTOR TO DO BTAONG AS RDOI@e0 POR P4NTMG0. °" rLDBµOCNB n�TONiOBs I re•xe ROOM. TO ee eO Aom--. A. x�Fr.rw�rro.. N .. b! w uy Asm� Irk LPYA u Id w b.Y d .me W d 1'wbaL AN+- 1. L. 1.•r] er u eta r..� ......L,.n.. onF w mu o.mtar tea RevuRBmE r¢t w� wane ct�0 iNr�.6n nvooton t® aowvru o • i - r xrAt tmmie n® CORUe.R1AR W • L N We F] K OPJTW AEJ K rJ� fQPI .PLCpQyNLlt pl•A -WTF WF AOB11f W4 NL6•� ]Fir palW 1---T.— O]BR - O® Te[B ®LAIV2 OIBW TO AO:eBOAR — PPIIJmERTB — NL PRLwr AZ A�AT reR] TREE PLANTING DETAIL BCUG p0 BCALB AM] 1� Va11 xe a T:r ro�e+.ww .r°�.w� .�0• r rD w .nL d �.. Dr s. R. eFrx .tw~i rw...r tr tau... R er:.f qa7 Tr.n u b yw.f w mYV n1 DyY Mev .drv. 1 ^su4� „Lm viJ ri r�w.� TREE PLANTING DETAIL �] SORT. xO 1 LANDSCAPE PLAN � ROAL. I. SO Ir I oil' s LAO ul L� `O Z S� a p0 W W a a 1z� u U z W oe U oe LO w LO 6 aUf��11 w- os-OOc LhNDttAPE ^'_AN ES SQFD LARGE ENOUGH ACCENT TREES' o� JUN 1 6 2008 ` OD 0 U a O O m v > n on 'u i it E , e � .F psi. 3¢ FREE STANDMG SIGN 9 AM MULZW OF ND SHRUBS Alm LW P i�' 111 / /i�ll� / /7 ■��l7�������� \gip [r n. Ell F- Lo rn � H � u�i W J IL w W a- U � z a J _i ar Dc to O 00 I-- I > o O `" I a rna QZ�V L 1 L.I Zw�� ❑ LLJ aWr � rY XQ N Z IL 0- W od • a i�' 111 / /i�ll� / /7 ■��l7�������� \gip [r n. Ell rasa - o fly Jill / \ I SILT FENCEa �' w ®,•. r + _Ail ROCK PnFANCE �"�• � � -tie � �° . _ o' W �� I ! PROPOSED SLMLDW W $ Me JUN I I�• -\ � � s g B — E� i r�dN L! F�j �4. �•/ I �C LEGEND w p p W • Aioloan mNIDE —' — mMU.m/NayAaa ue � 5 � maoga dm, sim1 _____ dinar � U Q p 1 mnN4D bmOWI Im NE CL }, - vlmro� as wx --- nnan�•uawo maa ua ° p a U muoao FOW tin o sa eawo C7 v1 j IlrILNY .e.NOTES '- noouv cmml inn urnuo• uem. 6 i - N .•e m b a.n b n C.� !• M1mn o�wNe b+EYq -.-- r�osm NxrtNn F11FA — •— Damn R1F10V11 N 4J - N•11/ M ..•Is bcelbs orM b.ab Mb �daial ngM1.w bM eesbuell.. A604D iliF)r•M — F11�111110 BVIYAf g11F11 u. - N M.md� b li.•. a ndWx.n M )!' d mwr. E� PIO�D NGRi! — E�IYIO SIOIY ®Id � WOOgD 6f6 WII 91Y@l019 — ^ — Fffi1110 BIOLm d9 IlR ("��" PPffgID N]W! MI iiIl1M9 — [ — F]mIY10 ®II® pSlllC UE CRMING NOTES -a- PImPOIID mN1011! — • — F]m100 BII•D IFIiP111mE IM A&EI NUI®FIt C3- N JMbs Nm� m• b M1N .vlaa '® AEWION —^— f]�IW •nED IFIEVIQM N[ Q - UAxb b rts..M• b aWMq s Ib6i/ 1VUmtl ObdvY. O.Nmllm S�Mn �— of iNl� —.®— ERIM dMAAI /'� ' fNCasl � sb�..�. Tenn r. L4eeslb. NIMb e.len m.errb. e.a�LL . vs C _..._mod ueN a taw newd GRADING PLAA,' NORTH FLOOR PLAN Ail FLO d 9 PLAd = SCALE ve' a r_O• °� -i W� NORTHWEST ELEVATION LUL, U w U w I ®� rtumso � OC r en- re®im�mr.rae �omRruw WEST ELEVATION w0 N ICLLG Vr f -P � Q ; S ll�Or�� E1 rA1R WRlVl6L ? � Ia' eon eaa eQa�maa rus. runm® ¢ O � ' ruaac ieruw W F33a ryac Iwo c_______ � eam mroa vcm - mw a p Z N.w� ur.r ooae ua Homo - d W o araYe uel O J mr of U �� F usr s *nu a au i S un �rou ai raa a ma rrau rom�ror .. _ ewm rm wen mw ms`s- m -oosr _ __ _______4 =:n:: =.____ NORTHEAST ELEVATION i1 NORTH ELEVATION �e1 X43 -I ac��e, yr - r -P BUILD JA t c 9VA"TIO 11% s seeee - �.� milli ,s tt '�--- ��111111111111 liillli11111 ' I - - -- I ; i iini I I - 11101111 -- 11/11111 -- ° ® MTH EAST ELEVATION �1►!°��q►� , T - 111111111111 ii1111111111 Illlilllllll ����1`j'.�I W� NORTHWEST ELEVATION LUL, U w U w I ®� rtumso � OC r en- re®im�mr.rae �omRruw WEST ELEVATION w0 N ICLLG Vr f -P � Q ; S ll�Or�� E1 rA1R WRlVl6L ? � Ia' eon eaa eQa�maa rus. runm® ¢ O � ' ruaac ieruw W F33a ryac Iwo c_______ � eam mroa vcm - mw a p Z N.w� ur.r ooae ua Homo - d W o araYe uel O J mr of U �� F usr s *nu a au i S un �rou ai raa a ma rrau rom�ror .. _ ewm rm wen mw ms`s- m -oosr _ __ _______4 =:n:: =.____ NORTHEAST ELEVATION i1 NORTH ELEVATION �e1 X43 -I ac��e, yr - r -P BUILD JA t c 9VA"TIO 11% s w Imo`, -5130 r rte/ �rrMrr� 100000 r0000 1000000-100000- i0:0 .M/ IMME. 111111111 rnm1n M.. o m. ONEW MMM 10000-1 w ... �.. e ■EI ■E■ 11111111 11111111 ■EI Ono map END- ova, is u 1= MJ t.pid tube Exit ONE 11111111 111,, man ,viol NEI owl mllu 1111111 � NMI ■ ■ F f� y 3 t , m t M, E0 id L,be RaP owl mu��� 111 Tar. m 001 I 1N 161 00 It 000 190 1000 0011 0010 0 Imm mm mml mm 4w ." I ipoie fs -ddt■ - 14 via MA ON Ar 4'1 �,� 4 04 v -4 Rapid tub. I.", rrr ■rr rrr ..,rrr NNW rrr OWN mom rrr-- rrr- - rrr mom mom v -4 MIA. fY r. I / h 4 r� vi 50zD A:) 3 WE ARE THE CHUMIEU N't MARt A;+ T. LpI t, 5 OF, MAY (�F M 0 �gtvA. f� e MEMORANDUM - Plan Review OM v a ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA DATE: June 19, 2008 TO: Cary Teague - Planning Director � — FROM: Wayne Houle C: Jack Sullivan – Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Auto Service Center 5415 70th Street West Engineering has reviewed the Civil Engineering Plans for the above stated project and offer the following comment: - A Nine Mile Creek Watershed Permit will be required. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this review. Thanks GAEngineering \GeneraR70 - 79 Streets \5415 70th Street West\20080619 5415 70 St memo to Cary Teague .doc Aj 7 Page l of 1 S3, 4 R4Ncr- file: //\ \ed- ntl \citywide\PDSImages \Photos \1802824440026001.jpg 6/25/2008 LOGISMap Output Page 53S4 F-RoG�; City of Edina Street Name Labels ./ l" City Limits ■ Creeks ® Lake Names O Lakes j Parks �—I IJO., w . r ® tir OPID jPUnnadinousiroloistrsol M {Plannad Off" Uislrrc1•11 EDP0D•2{Pl2nnW Otficaois w 21 ■ PRD•1jPUnnodRasKlanlDisirir_t • tl !T PID: jPiannao Rasbant DIS1n0 .3j ® 1802824440113 "" PRO SjPisnnodResdanlflrstrxi 51 5330 France Ave S Edina MN 55410 PSR•4 jPlannad Sanwr ResKlanm41 R -1 (8mglaDwaiung Unn DislW1 R�240autAoDwenmg UnA Otsincll ❑ RMO jRogwnalMadicjiDninGl 1• s W IT L _ `w book- •. r 4 { 5aor :-- sraa x � a � sros ua�.r.•nwwa c�n•��c,.uasusam Page 1 of I Legend House Number Labels I' Street Name Labels ./ l" City Limits ■ Creeks ® Lake Names O Lakes j Parks �—I Zoning I' APD jAutomoaiw Pusmg Disc n-1I MOD JjMiKaaDm IapmantOislrid,41 ■ MDO.5jMuwd Davawpmanl Oislrid -51 ® MD0 C ;Mu d Da Iupffsanl OMrtn•£I O Park ■ PCD•1 jPiannad ComnwrcU10mrii 11 ® PCfl2jPUnnadCommwrcwl Dialrict•2l ® PCD ){PUnnodConurwrroi0mru1 31 ® PCO- 4jPi3nnad CommarcuiDWw.41 OPID jPUnnadinousiroloistrsol DPO0.1 {Plannad Off" Uislrrc1•11 EDP0D•2{Pl2nnW Otficaois w 21 ■ PRD•1jPUnnodRasKlanlDisirir_t • tl PRO 2jP13nnod kaswanl Dis1rM -21 EllPRD•l jPiannao Rasbant DIS1n0 .3j ® PRO-41PUnnad R-4anl Disiml.41 ® PRO SjPisnnodResdanlflrstrxi 51 . PSR•4 jPlannad Sanwr ResKlanm41 R -1 (8mglaDwaiung Unn DislW1 R�240autAoDwenmg UnA Otsincll ❑ RMO jRogwnalMadicjiDninGl ElParcels 2006 Aerial Photo I' Page 1 of 1 Slbb VN-nan X30 file: //\ \ed -ntl\ citywide\ PDSImages \Photos\2811721310033002 jpg 6/25/2008 LOGIS* Output Page PagF- I 1 W r� 5-106 VCfnbvA Property Owner City of Edina LegaNd House Numher La Gels Street Name Labels Mn Maf Mrr ,t„ f 1802824440113 Ownm 1 Bradley Bakke wf 2008 Sale Date: 11/1/1999 County I 7101 Lanham La Property Type: A city Limns Ij Address: 3808 54TH ST W Edina, MN 55439 \r Creeks Sale Ratio: W1y City Address: 5330 France Ave S r e, F h Lake Names o $150,000.00 Sale Type: I1 Zip Cade: r U) Laker Bldg Value: $971,700.00 Sale Comments: NOT MARKET SALF School CParks Total Value: $1,121,700.00 • at'�r5 Zoning __ rifliii lr j)t APO(A- -bib Panlmp Dlnndl faN hN Acres _ ,� - ❑ MDO.A IMune OPwbenranl OwWJ1 [SqFt] ■ MOO 51Miaad Daaabemanr DMrinf)1 1111 Parent PID: ��Y t Geometric Acres: 1.08950320924 LU MOO -l(M—d DaWO— Oiwlrk1 11 >� — _......- Mff � PID: VIII ❑ °'"" Land Value: $150,000.00 1802824440113 ■ Pco ,IPL— cam —ai Dm-in __ _ _ .aa f f A `p. ❑ PCo -t lPbnnM cem—w malt, 21 !!" Effective Depth: _ ` \ 5330 France Ave S MO )IPbnnalcmnman�a O d d ) Display PID: wf Frontage [Ft]: / Edina, MN 55410 ❑ MO a(Pynn dcam mrco Dend Jl far -.__.- � . ❑ Pm lPlannad and Pdrd D+wrrdl xa, - ' _ ,, �, •- ; ❑ Poo., LPMnnee are Diercl.,1 - - � ❑ PoD 2IManPWarrworr..d a alra / % \,mss ; J ■ PRO -, JP— Rnaldenl 0.— ,l ❑ PRD21PW—R -1 Drat .. a, PROM IPIannadRmdenlOMM)I Jim r 9 �, ❑ MOJ (P,an mad Res 1 Drdriel Jl A srM 1V �'-. T,..a T I�_i.'� • � • ® oaRJlPbn ned senor Readenaa -q erff ,r .i -_ d. q -, 1S.'l. riaM aUnd 0vl 1 � R lDaebYOwaine Una Didndl �/��) ._Ir ' ❑ RMD IRegbnal Medkal DeW.dl 2000 Aerial Photo Property Owner Assessing Sales (Last ro sales Max.) PID: 1802824440113 Ownm 1 Bradley Bakke Assessment Year: 2008 Sale Date: 11/1/1999 County 7101 Lanham La Property Type: A Sale Price: $260,000.00 Address: 3808 54TH ST W Edina, MN 55439 Homestead Code: N Sale Ratio: 99 City Address: 5330 France Ave S Land Value: $150,000.00 Sale Type: I1 Zip Cade: 55410 Zoning Bldg Value: $971,700.00 Sale Comments: NOT MARKET SALF School 0273 Total Value: $1,121,700.00 District: Zoning: Change: 1/1/1901 Acres Assessment Year: Property Type: 2007 A [SqFt] Parent PID: 1802824440024 Geometric Acres: 1.08950320924 Homestead Code: N Lot: 018 Geometric Area [SqR]: 47458.7597946904 Land Value: $150,000.00 Block: 001 Effective Width: Bldg Value: $971,700.00 Addition #: 77211 Effective Depth: Total Value: $1,121,700.00 Display PID: 18- 028 -24 -44 -0113 Frontage [Ft]: Assessment Year. _ _ 2006 , DRAFT MINUTE SUMMARY ZONING BOARD MEETING AUGUST 7, 2008 IN ATTENDANCE: Chair Mike Fischer, Bernadette Hornig and Scott Davidson B -08 -34 Murphy Automotive 5415 70th Street West, Edina, MN s er Request: Lot size variance and setback variance from 'd m' "�' 1 y area Planner Teague told the Board the applicant is p oposing to build a onerstgry. p 8,863 square foot automobile repair center with car wash- Planner Teague sc the building would be made of stucco with brick accents �p Cori'tinuing, Planner Teague noted two variances are required; a minimum lot size variance from 50,000. square feet to 34,517 square feet�to'allow nine service bays, :and a setback variance from a residential area from1110 # iot.to 75 feet With graphics Planner Teague illustratedtto the Boartl otler4Murphy Automotive sites that were granted Final Development Plan approvaI ith variances. Planner Teague concluded staff recommends�approval for the redevelopment of the subject site as an automofi�ea,service center based :on the following findings: a. There is a urnqu'e hardship to the property caused by the existing location of they lot m �e'lation to residential property across 70th T, Wvariances would, meet they intent of the ordinance because the buildingi'�is reasonably siz�edrygiven the lot area. The lot s zeVariance is similar to the variances granted for two other Murphy Automotive Stations within the City of Edina at 5100 Vernon and 5354. France. [ ] Tj The setback fcorn residential property is an existing condition. Mr. Rick MurphyryandtMrA teure Kaspers were present representing Murphy Automotive. Mr. Kaspers address`eOffie Board and explained that the size of the lot works well with their facility pointing out the proposed building meets setback and parking requirements, Mr. Kaspers explained the automotive service business has changed over the years, pointing out to the best of his knowledge Edina's Code is at least 42 years old, reiterating times have changed in the automotive business. Continuing, Mr. Kaspers said the Commission expressed concern with the number of bays, adding two of the bays are lube bays with vehicles moving in A 34. and out quickly, the other 7 bays will be manned with four technicians, explaining not all seven bays are "in use" at the same time. Chair Fischer opened the public hearing. Peggy and Joe Jennings, 5545 70tt Street West. Mrs. Jennings addressed the Board and stated everyone should be aware of their carbon footprint and she is concerned about loss of green space, the potential for noise, and lighting on the signage. Mr. Jennings commented that nine bays is a larger operation than what exists questioning if there would be an increase in traffic. Chair Fischer asked if anyone else would like to comment. There being no one Member Davidson moved to close the public hearing. Member Hornig seconded the motion. All voted aye; public hearing closed. Mr. Murphy responded to comments from residents acknowledging there will be a loss of "green space "; however, their proposal includes removal and re- sodding of an existing curb cut, and the additional planting of 12 over -story trees and 53 small bushes. Continuing, Mr. Murphy said it is his belief that the additional landscaping along with the natural downward slope of the site from West 70th Street should help minimize noise. Mr. Murphy pointed out the subject site is located adjacent to commercial and industrial areas as well as residential. In response to the question on illuminated signage Mr. Murphy said the site will comply with the City's Sign, Code; adding if he remembers correctly any illuminated signs will be turned off by 10 PM. Continuing, Mr. Murphy said the signs will,be' ambient. Chair Fischer in response to the question on the number of bays and traffic generated by those bays explained that the project as presented with seven service bays, two lube bays and one carwash actually reduce traffic, adding it appears a gas and repair service station generates more traffic. Member Hornig told the Board she focused on the hardship, adding it appears to her that based on previous similar variance approvals a hardship exists due to the small size of the lot and its direct location to residential properties. Member Davidson asked if the majority, of gas /repair stations in the City meet Code. Planner Teague responded the majority don't meet Code, adding if another one of our existing service stations adds -on or rebuilds variances would probably be needed. Member Hornig moved variance approval based on staff findings. Member Davidson seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. A33 r Ow y • j�'roxPO�u+'� • 1888 MINUTE SUMMARY Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, July 30, 2008, 7:00 PM Edina city Hall Council Chambers 4801 West 50th Street MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Lonsbury, Risser, Staunton, Schroeder, Fischer, Brown and Forrest MEMBERS ABSENT: Scherer, Grabiel and Sierks STAFF PRESENT: Cary Teague and Jackie Hoogenakker I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: The minutes of the June 25, 2008, meeting were filed as submitted. II. OLD BUSINESS- P-08-7 Final Development Plan Murphy Automotive' . 5415 701h Street West, Edina, MN Staff Presentation Planner Teague informed the Commission the applicant is proposing to build a one -story, 8,863 square foot automobile repair center with a car wash at 5415 70th Street West. The building would be made of stucco with brick accents. Planner Teague told the Commission the request requires a Final Development Plan with the following variances: 1. A minimum lot size variance from 50,000 square feet to 34,517 square feet to allow nine service bays on site. 2. A setback variance from a residential area from 110 feet to 75 feet. A_-�4 Continuing Planner Teague reminded the Commission this item was tabled at last month's Planning Commission meeting to allow staff, time to provide the Commission with additional information to include if the two proposed rapid use oil bays are considered the same as "service bays ", the amount of existing hard surface vs. new hard surface, noise, traffic analysis and landscaping. With graphics Planner Teague presented to the Commission two other Murphy Automotive sites (Grandview site and 54th & France site) within the City of Edina that received Final Development Plan approval with variances. Planner Teague concluded staff recommends approval of the Final Development Plan with variances for the redevelopment of 5415 70th Street West for an automobile 'service center based on the following findings: a. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the existing location of the lot in relation to residential property across 70th Street. b. The variances would meet the intent of the ordinance because the building is reasonably sized given the lot area. C. The lot size variance is S" Imilar to the variances granted for two other Murphy Automotive Stations within the City of Edina at 5100 Vernon and 5354 France. d. The setback from residential property is an existing condition. e. There would be.adequate parking to support the redevelopment. f. Landscaping on the site would be improved from existing conditions. Approval of the Final Development Plan is subject to the following conditions: 1) Subject to staff approval, the site must be developed and maintained in conformance'-with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped June 16, 2008. • Landscape plan date stamped June 16, 2008. • Building elevations date stamped May 30, 2008. • Grading plan date stamped June 16, 2008. Any changes made to the building plans, including color would be subject to review and approval of a revised Final Development Plan by the Planning Commission and City Council 2) Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Permit. The city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District's requirements. 3) Hydraulic hoists, pits, lubrication, washing, repairing and diagnostic equipment shall be used and stored within a building. A:55 2 4) The automotive center may not be operated between the hours of 11:00 P.M. and 6:00 A.M. 5) No merchandise shall be displayed for sale outside a building except in that area within four feet of the building. 6) No motor vehicles except those owned by the operators and employees of the principal use, and vehicles awaiting service, shall be parked on the lot occupied by the principal use. Vehicles being serviced may be parked for a maximum of 48 hours. 7) Body work and painting is prohibited. 8) All waste water disposal facilities, including sludge, grit removal and disposal equipment, must be approved by the city engineer prior to installation. 9) No sign may be illuminated between 1`0:00 pm and 7:00 am. 10) Per Section 850.10. Subd. 3.B of the City's Zoning Ordinance; a letter of credit, performance bond or cash deposit must be submitted in the amount equal to 150% of the proposed landscaping. 11. Elimination of one curb cut off Amundson Avenue, per the proposed site plan. Appearing for the Applicant: Tim Murphy, Murphy Automotive, and Steve ,Kaspers, Murphy Automotive. Applicant Presentation: Mr. Kaspers. addressed the Commission and told them their findings indicate that an automotive service center -no gas generates less traffic than a gas station /service center combined. Mr. Kaspers said their study also inciates that the majority of vehicle trips to their center come from a distance of two miles or less. Cbntinuing, Mr. Kaspers said the building was designed taking into account the potential for noise spillage, pointing out the proposed car wash is located on the side of the building that faces commercial and industrial. Mr. Kaspers also Pointed, out the majority of bays do not face the residential properties across Vilest 70th Street reducing noise impact. Comments and Questions from the Commission: Commissioner Forrest asked Mr. Kaspers the hours of operation. Mr. Kaspers responded the hours are M -F 7am — 8pm, Saturday, 8am — 5 pm. The facility is closed on Sunday. Commissioner Forrest questioned if the traffic analysis included vehicle test - drives. Mr. Kaspers acknowledged vehicles are test driven, adding he doesn't believe those" trips" were counted. Commissioner Risser acknowledged the increase in landscaping, adding she is still concerned with pollutants and the impact the loss of greenspace will have, especially during a large rain. Mr. Kaspers explained an underground water storage tank will be added to store and filter a one inch rain fall. Mr. Kaspers pointed out the site also slopes down from West 70th Street before leveling out, adding the inclusion of the underground water storage tank (there isn't one presently), and landscaping will mitigate the loss of greenspace Chair Lonsbury asked Planner Teague if the proposed signage meets Code. Planner Teague responded all signage requires review, approval and permitting from the Planning Department, adding to the best of "his knowledge a sign permit hasn't been applied for. Chair Lonsbury addressed the Commission and audience, explaining the public hearing for this project was closed at the June 25, 2008, Commission meeting, and testimony was taken and recorded, however; he'would like to offer the opportunity to anyone that didn't speak at the last meeting to speak now. No one was present in the audience that hadn't spoken before. A discussion ensued with Commissioners expressing concern that the Code for the PCD -4 zoning designation may need to be updated; pointing out the majority of gas stations /service centers in Edina probably do not meet Code, especially as they relate to lot size and proximity from residential properties. Further discussion focused on the question of if too much is being "squished" onto this lot, acknowledging Code may be out of date, but maybe a bay or two could be eliminated. Commissioners reiterated the applicant has two other facilities in Edina that received Final Development Plan and variance approval and in this instance what is proposed isn't drastically different from what exists and the transitional function of the site as an automotive center isn't being changed. Commissioner Staunton moved to recommend Final Development Plan approval with variances based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions, noting approval is based in large part on the fact that the Commission and Council have approved Final Development Plans with variances on.two separate occasions and two separate facilities owned and operated by the applicant, and all landscaping is to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer to ensure that proper drainage is being met, not only with the underground rain storage tank but also implementing some form of rain garden. It is further suggested that the City take another look at the Zoning'Ordinance as it relates to the PCD-4 zoning district. Commissioner Fischer seconded the motion. Ayes; Staunton, Fischer, Schroeder, Brown. Nays; Risser, Forrest and Lonsbury. Motion carried. 4 a� CA 0 ycOJ[POR4� ltl178 MINUTE SUMMARY Regular Meeting of the Edina Planning Commission Wednesday, June 25, 2008, 7:00 PM Edina City Hall Council Chambers 4801 50th Street West MEMBERS PRESENT: John Lonsbury, Nancy Scherer, Kevin Staunton, Michael Schroeder, Steve Brown, Arlene Forrest and Katie Sierks MEMBERS ABSENT: Mike Fischer, Floyd Grabiel and Julie Risser STAFF PRESENT: Cary Teague, Jackie Hoogenakker I. APPROVAL OF MINUTE SUMMARY: The minutes of the May 28, 2008, meeting were filed as submitted. II. NEW BUSINESS: P -08 -7 Final Development Plan Tim Murphy 5415 70t Street West Staff Presentation: Planner Teague informed the Commission the applicant is proposing to tear down the existing gas and automobile repair station and build a new 8,863 square foot automotive repair center with car wash. The request requires a Final Development and two variances; a minimum lot size variance and a setback variance from residential properties. Planner Teague told the Commission staff recommends approval of the Final Development Plan with variances based on the following findings: 1) With the exception of the variances, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Final Development Plan. 2) The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: A3f r a. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the small lot size, and the existing location of the lot in. relation to residential property across 70th Street. b: The variance would meet the intent of the ordinance because the building is reasonably sized given the lot area. c. The setback from residential property is an existing condition. 3) There would be adequate parking to support the redevelopment. 4) Landscaping .on the site would be improved from existing conditions. Approval of the. Final Development Plan is subject-to the following conditions: 1) Subject to. staff approval, the site I must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped June 16, 2008. • Landscape plan date stamped'June 16, 2008. • Building elevations date stamped May 30, .2008. • Grading plan date stamped June 16, 2008. 2) Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Permit. The city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District's requirements. 3) Hydraulic hoists, pits, lubrication, washing, repairing and diagnostic equipment shall be used and stored within a" building. 4) The automotive center may not be operated betweenIhe` hours of 11:00 P.M. and 6:00 A.M. 5) No merchandise shall be displayed for sale outside a building except in that area within four feet of the building or within pump islands used for dispensing motor fuels. 6) No motor vehicles except those owned by the operators and employees of the,principal use, and vehicles awaiting.service, shall be parked on the lot occu.piedby the principal use. Vehicles being serviced maybe parked for a maximum of 48 hours. 7) Body work and painting is prohibited. 8) All wastewater disposal facilities, including sludge, grit removal and disposal equipment, must be approved by the city engineer prior to installation. . 9) No sign may be illuminated between 10:00 pm and 7 :00 am Appearing for the Project: Mr. Tim Murphy, Murphy Automotive, applicant and Mr. Steve Caspers, Murphy Automotive. 2 a. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the small lot size, and the existing location of the lot in. relation to residential property across 70th Street. b: The variance would meet the intent of the ordinance because the building is reasonably sized given the lot area. c. The setback from residential property is an existing condition. 3) There would be adequate parking to support the redevelopment. 4) Landscaping .on the site would be improved from existing conditions. Approval of the. Final Development Plan is subject-to the following conditions: 1) Subject to. staff approval, the site I must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped June 16, 2008. • Landscape plan date stamped'June 16, 2008. • Building elevations date stamped May 30, .2008. • Grading plan date stamped June 16, 2008. 2) Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District Permit. The city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the District's requirements. 3) Hydraulic hoists, pits, lubrication, washing, repairing and diagnostic equipment shall be used and stored within a" building. 4) The automotive center may not be operated betweenIhe` hours of 11:00 P.M. and 6:00 A.M. 5) No merchandise shall be displayed for sale outside a building except in that area within four feet of the building or within pump islands used for dispensing motor fuels. 6) No motor vehicles except those owned by the operators and employees of the,principal use, and vehicles awaiting.service, shall be parked on the lot occu.piedby the principal use. Vehicles being serviced maybe parked for a maximum of 48 hours. 7) Body work and painting is prohibited. 8) All wastewater disposal facilities, including sludge, grit removal and disposal equipment, must be approved by the city engineer prior to installation. . 9) No sign may be illuminated between 10:00 pm and 7 :00 am Appearing for the Project: Mr. Tim Murphy, Murphy Automotive, applicant and Mr. Steve Caspers, Murphy Automotive. 2 Applicant Presentation: Mr. Caspers addressed the Commission and explained he is representing Murphy Automotive and has one comment with regard to lot size and the number of proposed bays. Mr. Caspers explained that not all bays are "manned "; bays are also used for diagnosis, etc. Comments /Questions from the Commission: Commissioner Staunton commented if the bays aren't being used by a technician vehicles could wait in the parking lot, pointing out if the number of bays is reduced a variance wouldn't be needed. Mr. Caspers reiterated that not all bays are staffed by a technician and those "extra" bays are needed under certain conditions where a vehicle can't be moved. Chair Lonsbury asked for clarification on the operation of the proposed car wash. Mr. Caspers responded they do sell car washes; however, the wash is mostly used as a "perk" for customers. Commissioner Staunton questioned if noise from the car wash could be a problem for neighbors. Mr. Caspers pointed out the car wash was purposely located on the south side of the building abutting other commercial properties to minimize noise impact. Commissioner Schroeder commented that as he views the proposal there are seven "service" bays, two 'oil change" bays for a total of nine bays, and one car wash, adding he believes the staff report indicates seven bays. Commissioner Schroeder questioned how the `oil change" bays are operated. Mr. Caspers said generally two cars being serviced and two waiting. Chair Lonsbury opened public testimony. Public Comment: Mr. Steve Wright, 5422 Creek View Lane told the Commission the current gas station is neighborhood based, adding he has reservations about this proposal. Continuing, Mr. Wright said he appreciates the upgraded building and the addition of a car wash but the loss of pumps is difficult, adding he believes the scale of the automotive center is too large, there will be too much blacktop for the site and there will be noise issues. Mr. Wright indicated a number of residents in his neighborhood are also concerned about the proposal, adding he wasn't aware of the proposal until a week ago. Commissioner Schroeder moved the close the public hearing. Commissioner Brown seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. A% 3 Chair Lonsbury asked Mr. Teague if notification was given. Planner Teague .. indicated notice was mailed and a sign posted 10 days prior to the meeting of the Commission as per Code. Commission Comment: Overall, Commissioners expressed support for the proposed upgrading of the site; howeverthe following - issues were raised. that would -require before - a decision by the Commission is made: 1. Clarify Code: Is the, request based on seven bays or nine bays. 2. Indicate the current amount of asphalt on site and after redevelopment. Is this. proposal. a decrease in greenspace, and if it is, how will the loss of greenspace be mitigated. 3. Provide a traffic analysis between current and proposed use. Commissioner Brown said he can support the proposal as presented and moved to recommend approval of the Final Development Plan. There was no second to Commissioner Brown's motion. A discussion ensued with Commissioners reiterating the need for additional information and Code clarification, noting they gene-rally support the project. Commissioner Staunton also expressed concern with the proposed lot coverage, adding in his opinion the irregular shape of the lot doesn't constitute a hardship. Chair Lonsbury stated if he reads the Commission correctly that it may be wise to table this request until the questions raised by the Commission are answered. . Chair Lonsbury asked Mr. Murphy his.opinion on the matter., Mr. Murphy agreed tabling the proposal would be best. Mr. Murphy said there is a difference between an automotive center vs. gas station /automotive center, adding automotive centers generate less traffic. Planner Teague told the Commission he agrees that tabling the request is best, adding he would like to take another. look at the Code. Continuing, Planner Teague said clarification is needed on service bays vs. oil bays,. noting Commissioner Schroeder brought up a good point. Commission Action Commissioner Staunton moved to table P -08 -7 to the Planning Commission meeting of July 30,200 .8. ' Commissioner Schroeder seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Jackie Hoogenakker From: mike wolff [michaelgwolff @comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 12:38 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: RE: P -08 -7 Hearing 5415 70th Street West Thank you, Jackie. - - - -- Original Message---- - From: Jackie Hoogenakker [ mailto :JHoogenakker @ci.edina.mn.us] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 11:16 AM To: mike wolff Subject: RE: P -08 -7 Hearing 5415 70th Street West Good Morning: Thank you for your e-mail regarding P -08 -7. Your e-mail will be placed before each Commissioner this evening. I am song for the mail delay. If you would like further information about the project please feel free to contact me either by e-mail or phone at 952 -826- 0465. Again, feel free to contact me at any time, I would be happy to mail you the redevelopment plans or else you can visit the. city website www.cityofedina.com and click on City Departments - Planning- Projects and scroll to the Murphy redevelopment summary. Thank You. Jackie Hoogenakker Planning Department. From: mike wolff [ mailto :michaelgwolff @comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 11:01 AM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: P -08 -7 Hearing 5415 70th Street West To whom it may concern, My name is Mike Wolff and I live at 5300 West 70th Street and I am writing in response to the Public Hearing to be held June 25, at 7:00 regarding 5415 West 70th Street. I want to express how adamantly I am apposed to this request or any request that will result in more traffic on West Seventieth Street. Traffic on West Seventieth Street has continually increased during the period I have lived here, with the number of vehicles traveling at speeds far greater than the posted speed limit increasing even faster than traffic levels. Further, there are more related nuisances, particularly garbage, as a result. Not only does this reduce the enjoyment of property for people living on West Seventieth Street, it also reduces the value of their homes. Obviously, the proposed plan would bring a significant amount of additional traffic to the area or Mr. M, J would not make such an investment. So, while Mr. Murphy may stand to gain from such an event, the people living around the property would suffer further loss of both property enjoyment and property value. Further, there is no real benefit to the immediate community as these services are readily available with locations nearby in any direction. 605/7009 5' Jackie Hoogenakker : rom: JEAN FOUNTAIN 0eanfountain @earthIink. net] Sent: Friday, July 04, 2008 4:35 PM To:' Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: 70th Street Development Thank you for the-opportunity to express my view regarding the proposed auto service center on 70th Street While I am aware that small businesses add to the vitality of the neighborhood and the city, I am opposed to the.proposed center for these reasons: I am concerned about the probability of reduction in property value for my home: The potentially large number of .parked cars and noise pollution that come with this kind of business will likeiy reduce the value of near -by homes. We appear to be replacing one eyesore for another eyesore. The large number of parking spaces and expanse of asphalt 'are not visually appealing. The site.plan does not indicate any green space that would soften the location— The site will look like, at best, a parking lot and, at worst, a junkyard. I support keeping dollars in Edina by providing neighborhood services that' residents typically use. However, this auto service does not appear to be one -that many in the neighborhood would use on a regular basis. With gas prices skyrocketing, we need more services nearby that reduce our need to drive extra miles. This doesn't do it for us. Edina already has at least a half dozen auto repair.centers. Is Edina saturated with auto repair service centers? Is there a better use for this property? I believe the .nswer to both questions is yes. Thank you for allowing me to express my views. Jean Fountain 7017 Weston Circle Edina, MN 55439 w June 24, 2008 Edina Planning Commission 4801 W. 50" St. Edina MN 55424 Dear Planners: I want to express concerns about the Murphy Automotive proposal for 5415 W. 70th St. This business will bring more traffic and noise to our part of the city and that is not good. Tire changing causes noise. Does the city have plans to mitigate such noise? Also, a car wash will add traffic in the 70th and Cahill area, an already busy intersection. From seeing the plans it. appears that the gas pumps are going away, meaning neighbors will have to drive at least several miles for fuel. That's another negative for the neighborhood. Lastly, as an ex- customer of Grandview Tire and Auto on Vernon Avenue, I confess to having reservations about the operators. Several experiences prompt my concerns: My wife once dropped her new SUV there for an oil change while we shopped at stores across the street. Upon walking back for the vehicle, we saw it exit the service bay, driven by a young man who squealed the tires as much as possible. Needless to say, she never went back. I remained a customer a bit longer, but at each visit it seemed that more and more things were "going wrong" with my pickup. Techs were constantly trying to sell me items I did not want or need. On what became my final oil change at Grandview, two different techs came into the waiting room with bad recommendations. The last straw was when I was told my pickup needed a new serpentine belt, a costly item that I had replaced a few weeks earlier. So when I saw the company's proposal for W. 70th Street, I had to ask myself: Do I really want these people in my neighborhood putting up a garish building and selling parts and repairs that people may not need? The answer is obvious: I would rather have the current Edina Fuel. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely Jim Landberg 5408 Creek View Lane Edina MN 55439 (952) 828 -9619 ��v:m 7N. Jackie Hoogenakker From: DONALD CAROL ENGSTROM [doncaroleng @msn.com] :nt: Saturday, August 09, 2008 4:41 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Murphy Automotive Development Case File P -08 -7 We live in a condo unit on Cahill Rd. and I can see nothing wrong with you allowing the final development plan to be completed. The building currently there is not very attractive, and it seems a new up to date building would be much better for our community. We are in favor of a new building. Thank you. 8/11/2008 6709 67107 5 T 6709 6708 6709 6708 6713 6712 6717 ✓i 671,3 67f2 6712 6712 9117 671E 6721 �` HWoftpalt 24 6717 6716 67f7 6716 6721 6726 6725 24 6721 6720 6721 6720 �LJ 88TH ST W 6801 6800 6801 6801, 6800 0 "801 6800 � A 6804 6805 6.804 680.4 6805 6805 6805 Y 6808 F 6809 6808 6809 6809 6809 6808 r 5512 z 6813 681,2 681,3 6624 24 66T3 5501 68f7 6816 / 6900 6817 6629 6925 5505 6904 6901 6833 24 5509 T 5408 6908 24 6905 5406 5513 69Q9 ' 5410 6972 6913 400 $402 5404 24 5517 Open Space 2 54112 6916 GRF£4C VEVV1JV 5601, 6920 ^� $414 5426 5424 5420 5418 5416' ; a 24 5600 5532 5.528 5524 w 24 5510 5506 5502 5,432 5420 r1 24 707-H ST W 5416 �-- 560; 554 5400 559 53 555 E5505 555 5557 5531 5523 515 7001 TD13 56 561 24/ c 5415 VLtAGE DR 5511 z 552775521 5525 0 7025 77-075 7017 x55301 531 24 5422 Ctee.Kv'%eO L n - I I�w• &�1ts. 6712 6716 5232 6720 6800 6804 5229 + + 6808 6805 1,r (tr 6812 6809 6816 6813 6820 6817 5824 6821 5224 5220 6828 6900�aR 5225 6904 5221 521,7 24 6908 6909 5216 6912 5212 DR 5221 52T7 24 24 �'• 24':� 5314 5312 5300 5310 530B = 36517 kz i -118 pccr� a�ecs �� e�p�es� Cncem o�e�ve o� 54\5 �� �' q Sub�ec� S1e. Residents who signed the position presented the following issues of concern: 1. The loss of pumps. This gas station is a community based gas station, gas pumps will be missed. 2. Scale of the new facility. The scale of the proposed building is too. massive and creates an overly large profile. As proposed there is a significant loss of greenspace that buffers the subject site from the residential properties across the street. 3. Noise issues. If the proposed facility has multiple service bays in operation the noise from the car wash, air pumps, mechanical equipment etc. could carry over into the residential neighborhood. Jackie Hoogenakker From - Jennings jjennings @visi.com] Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008 3:36 PM To: Jackie Hoogenakker Subject: Murphy Automotive Project -X-�em -=.A .6 We were at the Edina Zoning Board meeting on August 7th and voiced our concerns about the proposed Murphy Automotive project at 70th Street and Amundson Avenue. We will not be able to attend the meeting of the City Council on August 19th, but would like our opinions to be on record for consideration. 1. The size of the building with nine bays and about 40 parking spaces seems larger than it needs to be and possibly too big an operation for a mixed residential /commercial neighborhood. 2. The use of trees and grass to separate and screen the auto repair station from the street is a good thing, but the space between the parking lot and 70th Street, which appears to about five feet wide, doesn't seem wide enough to allow much greenery screening. More would be better. 3. The signs should be in keeping with the mixed residential /commercial character of the neighborhood. It is not clear to us how bright the lighted sign near the street will be, or whether the signs on the building will be lighted. Will any of the signs be the very bright LED type? Subdued signs would be a good thing. Thanks for considering these items. Overall, we think the design of the project is attractive, and certainly an improvement over the current gas station. Regarr'c. Joe a oid Peggy Jennings 5545 West 70th Street t 8/17/2008 - J Cxr� a� o e t4 v AQ • IN�pogAN' " To: I Mayor & City Council From: Cary Teague Planning Director Date: August 19, 2008 Subject: Final Development Plan with variances and Final Rezoning to redevelop 4010 65th Street West for a medical office building and parking ramp for Crosstown Medical LLC. (See project location on pages Al -A3.) Deadline for a city decision: October 21, 2008, Planning Commission Recommendation KhFUK'11KhCUMMLN UA l lUN Agenda Item II. B. Consent Information Only Mgr. Recommends 7 To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ® Resolution ® Ordinance FI Discussion The Planning Commission recommended approval of the request subject to the conditions on page 4 -5 of this report. (See minutes on pages A82 -A86.) Zoning Board of Appeals The Zoning Board of Appeals approved the variances. Staff has appealed the decision in order for the City Council to take final action on the entire project. (See minutes on pages A80 -A81.) Staff Recommended Action Approve the final development plan, subject to the conditions listed on page 4 -5 of this report. Introduction/Background The applicant is proposing to tear down the existing two- story, 26,000 square foot office building to build a 75,017 square foot, four -story medical office building with a five -level attached parking ramp. (See the applicant narrative and plans on pages A4 -A38, and the attached development plan book.) The total site area is 2.02 acres. The square footage of the building has increased slightly due to additional.storage space added in the lower level. (See page A31.) This proposed project has received Preliminary Approval by the City Council, per Planning Commission recommendation. (See Planning Commission and City Council minutes on pages A39 -A47.) The proposal requires the following: 1. Final Rezoning from Planned Office District -1 (POD -1) to Regional Medical District (RMD). The Fairview parking ramp rezoning is not requested, per Planning Commission and City Council recommendation. 2. Final Development Plan with the following Variances from the RMD standards: a. Front building setback variance from 74 feet to 52 feet. (A 22 -foot variance.) b. Rear building setback variance from 74 feet to 20 feet. (A 54 -foot variance.) C. Side building setback variance from 74 feet to 20 feet. (A 54 -foot variance.) d. Front parking structure setback variance from 67 feet to 18 feet. (A 49 -foot variance.) e. Rear parking structure setback variance from 67 feet to 20 feet. (A 47 -foot variance.) f. Side parking structure setback variance from 57 feet to 10 feet. (A 47 -foot variance.) g. A side yard drive -aisle setback variance from 10 feet to 3 feet. (A 6.7 -foot variance.) h. Minimum tract area variance from 10 acres to 2 acres. (An 8 acre variance.) i. A parking stall variance from 393 stalls to 373 stalls. (A 20 -stall variance.) Per the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the City Council, the applicant has addressed concerns over the height of the parking ramp. Thirteen (13) feet of height have been taken off the parking ramp, and six (6) feet off of the stairwell. (See pages A7 -A7b.) Please note, that by reducing the height of the parking structure, the size of the variances requested for the parking structure is also reduced; however they are now short 20 parking stalls. Primary Issues • Is the proposed use and Rezoning reasonable for this site? Yes. The proposed use is reasonable for five reasons: 1. A medical office building in this area is a reasonable use. The proposed use would also be allowed under the existing zoning designation of Planned Office District. The rezoning is seen as an extension of the Regional Medical District east of France. The site is adjacent to the parking ramp that serves the Fairview Southdale Hospital. (See pages A2 -A3.) While this property has a zoning designation of Automobile Parking District, it is a ramp that serves the Regional Medical District, as parking for the hospital. The reason that this site is zoned Automobile Parking District, is that it is the only zoning district that allows a parking ramp as a principal use. Parking ramps are allowed as an accessory use in the Regional Medical District. However, because the ramp is separated from the hospital by France Avenue, it sits on its own lot. 2 /r 2. The project would be developed with sustainable design principles. The applicant proposes to implement principles developed by the USGBC LEED standards. The rate and run -off from the site would be reduced, including utilization of a green roof system. (See the specific LEED principals proposed on page A6a, and the green roof plan on page A27.) 3. The parking ramp has been well designed to screen the cars. (See the color renderings on page A7 and in the development plan book.) The applicant has done a very good job in designing the parking ramp so the cars are.not visible, and making it blend in as part of the building. 4. The project would encourage pedestrian movement. A new 5 -foot sidewalk is proposed along 65th Street West to provide pedestrian movements to the park to the west, and the hospital to the east. Based on the number of parking stalls within the facility a provision of 19 off -street bicycle parking stalls must also be provided. 5. The site is located in close proximity with good access to and from the Crosstown Highway. (See pages Al -A2.) Wenck and Associates conducted a traffic impact study based on the proposed development and full build out of the north side of 65th as a Regional Medical District. WSB & Associates reviewed the document to determine if it was accurate. Both Wenck and WSB concluded that the existing roadway system could support the proposed project. (See traffic studies on pages A48 -A77.) The Edina Transportation Commission met on May 15, 2008, and recommended approval subject to conditions. (See minutes on pages A78 -A79.) • Are the proposed variances justified? Yes. Per Section 850.04.Subd.1.F., of the zoning ordinance, a variance should not be granted unless it is found that the strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue hardship. The following demonstrates that the proposal meets the variance standards when applying the three hardship tests: 1) Are there practical difficulties that prevent a reasonable use from complying with ordinance requirements? Yes. Reasonable use does not mean that the applicant must show the land cannot be put to any reasonable use without the variance. Rather, the applicant must show that there are practical difficulties in complying with the code and that the proposed use is reasonable. "Practical difficulties" may include functional and aesthetic concerns. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the shape and limited depth of the lot, especially the western half of the site. Also, the high water table prevents the parking from being constructed under ground. The variances would meet the intent of the ordinance because the building is reasonably sized given the allowed FAR in the RMD district is 1.0. The proposed FAR is .85. The height of the ramp and building are generally consistent with buildings and ramps in the area. (See page A38.) The site is an extension of the RMD District to the east, as the adjacent parking ramp to the east serves Fairview Hospital. The applicant has demonstrated that the proposed parking would be adequate for their needs. (See page A6c.) Based on their study they believe they would need 357 parking spaces base on the uses within the clinic, or 16 spaces less than what would be constructed. 2) Are there circumstances that are unique to the property, not common to every similarly zoned property, and that are not self - created? Yes. The subject site is unique given its close proximity and easy access to Crosstown Highway 62. Also, the circumstances of the shape and limited depth on the west side are unique to this property and generally not common to similarly zoned property. 3) Would the variance alter the essential character of the neighborhood? No. In general, a four -story medical office with a parking ramp would not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. There are several parking ramps and medical offices in this area, including on the adjacent property to east. Staff Recommendation Final Rezoning and Final Development Plan Recommend that the City Council approve the Final Development Plan and Rezoning for the proposed Crosstown Medical building at 4010 65th Street West. Approval is based on the following findings: 1. The rezoning would be an extension of the RMD district to the east. 2. The rezoning would be consistent with the City's guide plan. 3. The increase in density could be supported by existing roadways, as determined in the traffic study done by Wenck and Associates. 4. The rezoning would be consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. 5. With the exception of the variances, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Final Development Plan. Approval is subject to the following conditions: The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped June 30, 2008. • Grading plan date stamped June 30, 2008. • Landscaping plan date stamped June 30, 2008. • Building elevations date stamped July 17, 2008. • Roof plan date stamped June 30, 2008 2. The following must be submitted to the city before the city issues a building permit: a. A final landscape plan for staff approval. Additional over -story coniferous trees must be planted along the north lot line to further break up the mass of the structure, and provide year round screening. b. A copy of the recorded resolution with the county. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. The site needs to hold the first inch of rainfall. The remainder may go off site per a pond expansion agreement. 6. Compliance with the conditions required by the City engineer in his memo dated May 22, 2008. 7. Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 8. The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative within the staff report. 9. Trail and sidewalk connections must be included as demonstrated on the preliminary plans. Public easements must be established over all public sidewalks. 10. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the Fire Marshal. 11. Per Section 850.10. Subd. 3.B of the City's Zoning Ordinance, a letter of credit, performance bond or cash deposit must be submitted in the amount equal to 150% of the proposed landscaping. 12. Off -street provision of 19 bicycle parking spaces must be provided on site, subject to approval of the City engineer. Variances Uphold the Zoning Board of Appeals decision to approve the following variances at 4010 65th Street West for Crosstown Medical LLC: 1. Front building setback variance from 74 feet to 52 feet. (A 22 -foot variance.) 2. Rear building setback variance from 74 feet to 20 feet. (A 54 -foot variance.) 3. Side building setback variance from 74 feet to 20 feet. (A 54 -foot variance.) 4. Front parking structure setback variance from 67 feet to 18 feet. (A 49 -foot variance.) 5. Rear parking structure setback variance from 67 feet to 20 feet. (A 47 -foot variance.) 6. Side parking structure setback variance from 57 feet to 10 feet. (A 47 -foot variance.) 7. A side yard drive -aisle setback variance from 10 feet to 3 feet. (A 6.7 -foot variance.) 8. Minimum tract area variance from 10 acres to 2 acres (An 8 acre variance.) 9. A parking stall variance from 393 stalls to 373 stalls. (A 20 -stall variance.) Approval is based on the following findings: The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: 1. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the shape and limited depth of the lot, especially the western half of the site. 2. The variance would meet the intent of the ordinance because the building is reasonably sized given the allowed FAR in the RMD district is 1.0. The proposed FAR is .85. 3. The height of the ramp and building are generally consistent with buildings and ramps in the area. 4. The site's location adjacent to Crosstown Highway 62. 5. The high water table prevents the parking from being constructed under ground. 6. The site is an extension of the RMD District to the east. 7. The site would have adequate parking. 8. The site is located in close proximity to bus lines and bicycle parking would be provided. 6 SUPPORTING INFORMATION Surrounding Land Uses Northerly: Crosstown Highway (62) Easterly: The parking ramp for the Southdale Fairview Hospital; zoned APD, Automobile Parking District, and guided for office use. Southerly: Cornelia Place Apartments; zoned PRD-4, Planned Residential District, and guided high- density residential. Westerly: An office building; zoned and guided for office uses. Existing Site Features The subject property is 2.02 acres in size. The site contains the existing office building and a 60 -foot tall cellular tower with antennas. The cell tower would be removed, and the antennas placed on the roof of the new building. (See proposed elevation on page A7a.) Planning Guide Plan designation: Zoning: Final Development Plan Review Office POD -1, Planned Office District Section 850.04.Subd. 2.5, requires the City Council to make the following findings for approval of a Final Development Plan: a) is consistent with the Compreliensive Plan; The Comprehensive Plan designates the site for.office use. A medical office would be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. b) is consistent witli the Preliminary Development Plan as approved and modified by the Council and contains the Council imposed conditions to the extent the conditions can be complied with by the Final Development Plan, The proposed plans are consistent with the approved Preliminary Development Plan. c) will not be detrimental to properties surrounding the tract, The proposed structure is similar in height to surrounding buildings. (See page A38.) d) will not result in an overly - intensive land use; and e) will not result in undue traffic congestion or traffic hazards; The structure would meet the required floor area ratio requirement for the zoning district, and would meet the height requirements. A traffic study was completed and concluded that the roadways could support the new medical building. The Transportation Commission approved the project subject to conditions. (See page A78 -A79.) confonns to the provisions of this Section and other applicable provisions of the Code; and With the exception of the variances, the proposal conforms to the Zoning Ordinance. g) provides a proper relationship between the proposed improvements, existing structures, open space and natural features. Staff believes the proposal would meet this criterion. Grading/Drainage/Utilities The city engineer has reviewed the proposed plans and found them to be acceptable subject to the comments and conditions on the attached page A47a and A47b. Landscaping The applicant is proposing landscaping around the perimeter of the site. (See landscape plan on pages A27 -A29.) Based on the perimeter of the site, 33 over -story trees are required. The applicant is proposing 54 over -story trees. The applicant had previously proposed 36 over -story trees. The applicant has addressed the previous concern over sparse landscaping on the north and west lot lines, by adding a row of over -story trees along the west lot line, and filling in along the north lot line with under -story shrubs. While these are significant improvements, staff would recommend additional coniferous over -story plantings along the north lot line to break up the mass of the structure, and provide some year round screening. Staff has received several concerns from residents north of the Crosstown Highway in regard to the height and mass of the proposed structure. The additional landscaping would provide some screening for these residents. Building Material The office building would be a primarily brick with cast stone. The parking ramp would be designed to match the building and be built of architectural precast concrete. The parking ramp would be very well designed to screen cars. (See plans and renderings on pages A7 and A37 -A38, and in the attached development plan book.) Compliance Table * Variance Requested Deadline for a city decision: October 21, 2008 City Standard .(RMD District) Proposed Office Building - Setbacks 87' & 74' (based on 87' tall stairwell & 74' tall 52 feet* Front Setback (65th Street) Rear (Crosstown) building) 20 feet* West Side 87' & 74' (based on 87' tall stairwell & 74' tall 200+ feet East Side building) 20 feet* 87' & 74' (based on 87' tall stairwell & 74' tall Parking Structure building) Front Setback (65th Street) 87' & 74' (based on 87' tall stairwell & 74' tall 18 feet* Rear (Crosstown) building) 20 feet West Side 10 feet* East Side 150+ feet 67 feet (based on 67' tall structure) 67 feet (based on 67' tall structure) 57 feet (based on 67' tall structure) 57 feet (based on 67' tall structure) Minimum Tract Area 10 acres 2.02 Building Height No maximum (Height is determined by required 67 -foot tall parking setbacks) ramp 81 -foot tall stairwell 74 -foot tall medical building (Variances requested for setbacks) Parking lot and drive aisle 20 feet (street) 20+ feet setback 10 feet side and rear 3 feet* Maximum Floor Area Ratio 100% 85% (FAR) Parking Stalls 393 (based on square footage of the building plus a 373* max. of 18 doctors on site at one time * Variance Requested Deadline for a city decision: October 21, 2008 ORDINANCE NO. 850 -A -32 AN ORDINANCE REZONING 4010 65th STREET WEST FROM POD -1, PLANNED OFFICE DISTRICT TO RMD, REGIONAL MEDICAL DISTRICT The City Of Edina Ordains: Section 1. 1.01 The subject property is hereby rezoned from POD -1, Planned Office District to RMD, Regional Medical District based on the following findings: The rezoning would be an extension of the RMD district to the east. 2. The rezoning would be consistent with the City's guide plan. 3. The increase in density could be supported by existing roadways, as determined in the traffic study done by Wenck and Associates. 4. The rezoning would be consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. 5. With the exception of the variances, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Final Development Plan. Section 2. 2.01 The subject property is legally described as follows: Lots 2 and 3, Block 1, Southdale Office Park, Hennepin County, Minn. First Reading: Second Reading: Published: ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor Please publishing in the Edina Sun Current on Send two affidavits of publication Bill to Edina City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 19, 2008, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2008 City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 2008-76 APPROVING A FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN WITH VARIANCES FOR CROSSTOWN MEDICAL City of Edina BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, as follows: Section 1. BACKGROUND. 1.01 Crosstown Medical LLC is requesting a Final Development Plan review with the following variances at 4010 656 Street West: 1. Front building setback variance from 74 feet to 52 feet. (A 22 -foot variance.) 2. Rear building setback variance from 74 feet to 20 feet. (A 54 -foot variance.) 3. Side building setback variance from 74 feet to 20 feet. (A 54 -foot variance.) 4. Front parking structure setback variance from 67 feet to 18 feet. (A 49 -foot variance.) 5. Rear parking structure setback variance from 67 feet to 20 feet. (A 47 -foot variance.) 6. Side parking structure setback variance from 57 feet to 10 feet. (A 47 -foot variance.) 7. A side yard drive -aisle setback variance from 10 feet to 3 feet. (A 6.7 -foot variance.) 8. Minimum tract area variance from 10 acres to 2 acres (An 8 acre variance.) 9. A parking stall variance from 393 stalls to 373 stalls. (A 20 -stall variance.) 1.02 The specific proposal is to tear down the existing two- story, 26,000 square foot office building to build a 75,017 square foot, four -story medical office building with a five -level attached parking ramp. 1.03 On July 30, 2008, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Final Development Plan and Variances. 1.04 On August 7, 2008, the Zoning Board of Appeals approved the variances. Staff appealed the decision in order for the City Council to take final action on the Final Development Plan and Variance. Section 2. FINDINGS 2.01 With the exception of the variances, the proposal would meet the required standards and ordinances for a Final Development Plan. 2.02 The proposal meets the required standards for a variance, because: 1. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the shape and limited depth of the lot, especially the western half of the site. 2. The variance would meet the intent of the ordinance because the building is reasonably sized given the allowed FAR in the RMD district is 1.0. The proposed FAR is .85. 3. The height of the ramp and building are generally consistent with buildings and ramps in tha gron City Hall 4. The site's location adjacent to Crosstown Highway 62. 952 - 927 -8861 FAX 952 - 826 -0390 4801 WEST 50TH STREET EDINA, MINNESOTA, 55424 -1394 www.cityofedina.com TTY 952- 826 -0379 RESOLUTION NO. 2008- Page Two 5. The high water table prevents the parking from being constructed under ground. 6. The site is an extension of the RMD District to the east. 7. The site would have adequate parking. 8. The site is located in close proximity to bus lines and bicycle parking would be provided. 2.03 The increase in density could be supported by existing roadways, as determined in the traffic study done by Wenck and Associates. Section 3. APPROVAL NOW THEREFORE, it is hereby resolved by the City Council of the City of Edina, approves the Final Development Plan and variances for the proposed Crosstown Medical building. Approval is subject to the following Conditions: The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped June 30, 2008. • Grading plan date stamped June 30, 2008. • Landscaping plan date stamped June 30, 2008. • Building elevations date stamped July 17, 2008. • Roof plan date stamped June 30, 2008 2. The following must be submitted to the city before the city issues a building permit: a. A final landscape plan for staff approval. Additional over -story coniferous trees must be planted along the north lot line to further break up the mass of the structure, and provide year round screening. b. A copy of the recorded resolution with the county. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. The site needs to hold the first inch of rainfall. The remainder may go off site per a pond expansion agreement. Compliance with the conditions required by the City engineer in his memo dated May 22, 2008. RESOLUTION NO. 2008- 7. Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 8. The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative within the staff report. 9. Trail and sidewalk connections must be included as demonstrated on the preliminary plans. Public easements must be established over all public sidewalks. 10. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the Fire Marshal. 11. Per Section 850.10. Subd. 3.13 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, a letter of credit, performance bond or cash deposit must be submitted in the amount equal to 150% of the proposed landscaping. 12. Off -street provision of 19 bicycle parking spaces must be provided on site, subject to approval of the City engineer. Adopted by the city council of the City of Edina, Minnesota, on August 19, 2008. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN CITY OF EDINA )SS James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 19, 2008, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 2008. RESOLUTION NO. 2008- Page Two City Clerk 4243 12" 1 -1. I [ 6723 " 63D1 It 6369 Sc 6n4 Q16 6306 6773 6312 E717 6311 (211 6]17 6317 6316 ° 6357 6371 /11D 6118 6723 6720 6325 6321 a a0a 6220 6129 6328 /pp 61�p 6223 6338 673 )A�6ro� Aa1F5 1o7a (Df0 6100 Nawro Bark �l City of Edina 19_62p g�: 617'227 812( y 6111 6220 1 T('2J/ 6228 6725 '.621 �p�j� 1a9�A�M 7 " 66nrsrw esis 36zs 8923 -,a 6517 6524 SIOD 2/ 4525 6573 BaTHS7w 2301 �20 6650 6617 6624 6611 662/ 6621 _ 6701 6100 �� 6700 6761 670/ 8703 a5 p�, 10 100 6636 6704 0.-6)11 6717 6)16 6777 6)00 6800 •nMar6 epe',C„[A6Mm p� 6 �v� 300 -vA,1 4 _ PID:3002824140004 •' r� 4010 65th St W �,Y Edina, MN 55435 •'hcY7up�nw4t a nlui, Logond Highlighted FeatUM H7 - Number -bell Stroh Name Leb61s .! City Umits / Greeks Lake Names Lakes Parks Parcels T � Ya Moro,% • ■ � �I I w - r e t T7 T 1 `yy { ~ 3AVTI Vie-- -j m �' u � u i M � • O Yw r .. 4 N A M, r l 1 kr 4 _U a'� . 7 s -.. �... Aj R 1LOGISMap Output Page City of Edina 6118 6}71- 6/296140- 614161N- 613361]7 - 6/336118 - 61296128 1145 - 6147 - -- - 4A5_ _._ e]NG r N _.. — (-6200 6T07Y670T� 6Z� a }ra N-•^ -- v, IOfJ 62Dt 6100 6107 8700 14 col 0 7 1726 1125 1 /O7 / 6p,/ 6706 6105 { 6208 6705 670[ 610. 6201 74 � 7 }94 }11 8705 rte} ,,yq. f 1 —'6Y20 4Y16 !IN 16212 8711 -.0108 62086621/ 62f51 6217 5209 6308 8206 67(18 f' V 6224 16771 6220 621) -6112. 6215 �67T8 •7}9�6T76 8717 6712 6213012 71 % 7/ 6225{2!7 t2m 612/ - 6225 6716 6T 19116777 622],,j8270 6217 6215 6117 6216 i2t! 8177 4228 4 / 6226, 677'-6170 6223 6276 2236224 6111 6110 6121 6270 217 7666 \.6746 '11' 234 67J7� 6IJ7 6221 ' 6UJ6128 62786tH 6215 8711 { '.6277 4113 6301 -6230 71674+ `671f tI7 127 6140 :6701 6300 - 6305 X6731 63016300 6301 Woo 6701 I/- Ux - I 1727 pp 427/y 6760 6705 6301 ,k- 6309 -' 6300 6305 6304 16305 62M 6305 - 6701 6709. ?1 q 4127v bra ' 6]09 6308 6317 .6301 6309 6708 '0.}08 - 13121 1jj637J tAf �t1-a 6768 �s'6J7] 6312 a 63/7;6311 31 312 �', 5312 ,6JOd ' f U211 sIr6777 �T} ,�BJfT. 67}7 rJ16 6]11 -'6318 63]78,716, �6217 a` 1724 ^5' 6725 ?! if �27016J/6 i - 6375 6310 b 6725 `8727 8771 6320 �`. ,710 13]7 6779 : 4201 a 4 206, 8JI0 al 6328 - 6378 - 0329 67M 6}15 a TI( - 4zoD 6770 6335 633! 6l]5 VALLEY VHYAD TONS f}tAfICB AVES }D IMF taW6} 6767 1a!i1PNlY8t ft'1•P71n Rgl�lb PPn t 4]00 6608 24 s600 608 6813 660! 6605 _ 68M 6617 X17 6608 6616 6621 6612. - 6616 6617 6670 6615.6620 6617 L6611 6629 6624 66711 6701 6700- ''670/'1 6,00 - "01 6704106705 6705 74 6701 6709 :,,2i 6709 6701— 6717 ; 67,7 i71J� 6717 6717 6T18� p 1717 6800 C - -• 6801 68001 }i /6801 6805 �68W i 76808 - 166p6� 8808'8808 '6806 6817 ' H9p0 .6813 : 8817, 69Df bra _ 8877 6905 696908.. " .6901 6611 6916 8913 92 8916 6805 6900 qK usoan._..kN6@ -vBOCS nSa E901 e P 66:N SR 24 PID:3002824140004 4010 65th St W Edina, MN 55435 q w O r �1 U O a Logond Mouse Numae' L",* s S".t Name Labels City Limits C]eeks DLake Names Lakes Parks Z- ..v ® APD (AP1Pf b W P &n D./ 1 f 1•L• 'ii.�� NOOaINtw4 UmabPewm D.t nelll . 1800 -51RW Oma Pmmn Ostmi -SI 24 PID:3002824140004 4010 65th St W Edina, MN 55435 q w O r �1 U O a Logond Mouse Numae' L",* s S".t Name Labels City Limits C]eeks DLake Names Lakes Parks Z- ..v ® APD (AP1Pf b W P &n D./ 1 NOOaINtw4 UmabPewm D.t nelll . 1800 -51RW Oma Pmmn Ostmi -SI 'T?T J1O1 MOD•slMuw Uwa�Pmw:Dm•r.{i Pas PCD•t LP.n+nv COmrm�o�Uxr� -1� PCD- 21Pan_Cotm�vrnDa -2: ® PCDJIWnnw CPevi>mr .D. 31 ® PCD <(P.nnal C­ DW-11 DPC IPa,_lnsvevP 0.1v 11 OPDp.t IPYmnw ONmPO.v,a -11 OPOD-2 (Py.nw ON— 0.1.c.p ■PR Gt (Pannw N�fmtDmmt�. ^j PRDi1P�nnw Finamt O�eM2 ^J '•,,T'.� PFD -31 PU Femwf D.,. I J'Ta PAD14PUnnpaFv+yPnt 01tlm1 <' �® PFD 11 iPamnw Fac -amt Dm.aa -5� P6F <IP.nnW bana•Femsnxai - -- F- 116.pb G+MenB Un�Dat -eri ® R- 21Umeb D+v.c>,s Uwe D.1r�1 DRMD {Rassna M�ao:Oa<rc1: Parcels APP LIcf�wT 1000 Twelve Oaks Center Dr. Tel 952.426.7400 �"�0` °rC Mohagen Suite 200 Fax 952.426.7440 Hansen Wayzata MN 55391 www.mohagenhansen.com Arch Crosstown Medical Office Building June 30, 2008 Design Narrative��,� Final Development Application Introduction: On behalf of Hegenes Management, Inc., Twin Cities Orthopedics, P.A., and Edina Crosstown Medics ,C, we are pleased to submit this Final Development Application to the City of Edina, Planning Department for consideration. The Mohagen /Hansen Architectural Group Design Team and the Crosstown Leadership Team of the Medical, LLC, have worked diligently .to develop a solid concept for the proposed medical office building that not only meets the expansion needs of Twin Cities Orthopedics, P.A., but also provides a quality development which enhances the existing neighborhood. During the Preliminary Development Application process, both the Planning Commission and City Council provided helpful feedback and a very clear indication of the primary issues and concerns about the project. The Design Team has taken each of these issues into account and has addressed these issues in the design modifications in a manner that we believe can be supported by both the Commission and the Council in this final review process. Preliminary Application Process Findings: During the preliminary review, the project was generally well- received. Even those who ultimately did not support the project, praised the project for its quality of design and careful development in light of the complexity of the design parameters. The positive feedback included the following: 1. Efficient use of the site regarding vehicular and pedestrian access 2. Well- designed exterior, 3. Thoughtful development of parking, garage fagade; a new standard for parking structures in Edina 4. Creative incorporation of sustainability initiatives 5. Appreciation for design elements along street frontage (scale, green space) 6. The right kind of project for a site like this — superior to other alternatives 7. Creates a high quality bookend to the Fairview Southdale Hospital complex to the east of the skyway and gateway to the district 8. Rezoning the parcel seems like a valid approach that should have been considered previously The primary concerns raised in the preliminary application process were: 1. Density — building square footage as it relates to site area, or FAR. 2. Traffic— ability for the infrastructure to accommodate this project 3. Parking Massing — the size of the parking garage relative to the building 4. Parking Provisions — the number of stalls required by the Owner as compared to the ordinance minimum 5. Building Massing — the size of the structure relative to the site and the surrounding neighborhood buildings To address the concerns and issues, we offer the following information. Density: In reviewing both the proposed comprehensive plan revisions as well as the existing Comp Plan document, it is apparent that the Community Activity Center district of which this site is a part allows for various density conditions ranging from .5 FAR to 1.0 FAR. While this allowance does not relate directly to the zoning classifications, it is clear that increased density is intended to fall within this area. Proximity to Highway 62 further supports the idea of increase density, specifically on this lot, as a means of keeping traffic at the perimeter of the district rather than El Mohagen /Hansen Architectural Group Design Narrative Final Development Application June 30, 2008 Page 2 of 3 Density (continued): 1� drawing the traffic right into the area where the major traffic conflicts are being felt. Addition �Lly:ie current Regional Medical District does not allow for any future growth of services due to the nature of the,txisbng- medicalf" development as well as other fixed boundaries in the area such as the roadways, natural features, and44esideiitia ' neighborhoods that flank the site. In order for the medical district to experience any viable growth, sites like the 4010 65th Street site must be allowed to build substantial projects that make sense for providing and preserving services vital to the area. Traffic: Traffic or infrastructure concerns in the City of Edina are real and substantial. The concerns specifically in the area of this project have been tied to the intersection at Highway 62 and France Avenue, and West 65th Street and France Avenue. In the initial Traffic Study, reviewed and unanimously approved by the Transportation Commission, the project assumptions were set up as a worst case scenario for the 4010 site, the adjacent bank site and the Fairview parking ramp. In fact, the study assumed a density or FAR of 1.0 for the 4010 site and the bank site while also factoring in the traffic generated by two additional levels on the parking structure. Even in this worst case scenario, it was evident that there would be little real impact on the above - mentioned intersections of concern. Essentially, the impact of the project did not tip the LOS of the intersections into an unacceptable level, or did not worsen the LOS. (Loss of Services), as in the case of the Highway 62 and France Avenue intersection. The impact on the West 65th Street and France Avenue intersection was minor, but along.with concerns of local residents, the study recommended that controlled left turn lanes and signals be developed from West 65th Street on to France Avenue, both north and southbound. The project proponents have agreed to participate in the upgrading of that intersection as identified by the City of Edina. In its final configuration, the Twin Cities Orthopedics: Crosstown Medical Building will have an FAR of .83 and the bank site currently has an FAR of .44. Redevelopment of that site with any additional square footage is not likely. Therefore, the actual impact of the Crosstown project on the infrastructure will be less than that indicated in the Traffic Study. As a point of comparison, our traffic engineers provided an impact study based solely on the impact of the project as proposed with no consideration for increased traffic for adjacent properties. The findings show that the project will have little impact on the infrastructure, but still recommends the addition of the signalized left turn lanes from West 65th Street to France Avenue. Please refer to the attached Traffic Study memo as prepared by Wenck Engineering for more detailed information. Parking Massing and Parking Provisions: Often, density is confused with massing, but in the review process it was clear.that density, as it relates to impact on infrastructure, and massing, as it relates to how big the physical structure is, were both concerns. One aspect of this concern was how big the parking structure was relative to the building itself, while the other aspect was related to how big the structure was relative to the site and neighboring buildings. To address the massing issue, the Commission stipulated that the Design Team pursue elimination of some parking stalls, with the assumption that the number of stalls required by ordinance was more than what would be required by Twin Cities Orthopedics' patients and staff. The team was able to work with TCO to determine their actual parking need to be 357 stalls for all patients, staff and physicians. As compared to the original parking provided per ordinance of 390 stalls, it was clear that up to 33 stalls could be eliminated and still meet the needs of the Owner. As we looked further into the parking issue, we found that we could reduce stall widths from 9' -0" to 8' -6 ", which meets the City minimum for standard stalls and 011 0 Mohagen/Hansen Architectural Group ® Design Narrative i 1 0 Final Development Application.. r> J June 30, 2008 ^ >- Page 3 of 3 A ' Parking Massing and Parking Provisions (continued): incorporates some compact stalls to then increase our stall count on the remaining leve the rp. By elimina the top level of the ramp, a 72 stall reduction, and adding in the additional stalls gained `� r striping, the proje �w still short of the 357 stalls required to meet TCO's demand. , The Design Team further investigated how we might gain additional stalls by extending the noitfi la oo parking structure partially below -grade to pick up additional stalls. The net gain of stalls put the total number of parking stalls provided at 373, which is less than is required by ordinance, but in excess of that required by TCO. It also meets the requirements of a standard medical parking requirement of 1 stall per 200 GSF as is common in many cities, or 368 stalls. The final result, as will be seen from the street, is that the parking structure will be 13'-4" shorter. on all sides, including stair towers. This reduction in height significantly decreases the setback variances for the parking structure, reduces the scale of the parking structure relative to the building, and generally promotes abetter sense of scale for the project as a whole. Building Massing: Some Commission and Council members related a sense that the building was just "too big ". Ultimately, the size of the building is being driven by TCO's specific program needs and the need for a certain size floor plate to make the surgery center and clinic layout work efficiently. In an attempt to address this issue, the Design Team took a closer look at the floor to floor heights of the building to see if any reductions could be made. In fact, some reductions were realized, but the penthouse element ends up being the driving factor in establishing building height. In that area, we have increased the green roof to extend over the penthouse. That combined with the required structural and mechanical clearances result in the height indicated in this final application drawing. The primary area where a reduction in building mass is realized is in the lowering of the parking structure by eliminating a level and then by reducing the elevator tower height accordingly. Building setbacks relative to the street and adjacent properties seem significant, but when compared to the parking ramp and bank, the setbacks on the north are reasonable. Although the setback variances on all sides are significant, the hardships that come with the odd site proportions and ground water issues justify the variances, particularly on the east, south and west sides of the building. In the refinement of the design, the overall variances have been reduced significantly. The rezoning from POD to RMD, and the allowance for more building square footage, combined with the need to have a specific floor plate to meet TCO's needs, results in a building size that is less than that allowed by the RMD zoning ordinance. Its size is ultimately driven by need of the owner /user, not a desire to increase possible rental space opportunities. Summary: Overall, with the feedback and direction from our public meetings, the Commission and Council, as well as continued refinement of the design, we believe that the project has benefited greatly and, hopefully, meets the expectations and approval of the City of Edina. Issues related to traffic and massing have been specifically addressed in the Final Development Application. Concerns over density will continue to be a point of contention as the city wrangles with the idea of allowing for creative and beneficial growth and development while balancing concerns of community convenience and safety. We believe that the Traffic Study has adequately addressed concerns over impact on the infrastructure, and therefore, also supports the additional density represented by this project. We also believe the Crosstown Medical Office Building is an appropriate use of the site, fulfills the growing demand for medical services, and is a quality project that is complementary to the neighborhood. VGA k: \ jobs \ crosstoum_ medical\ cross town_medical_shell_07430\ 001_admin \ code\ 07430_memo_rezoning_narratiae, final.dorr M Mohagen/Hansen Architectural Group LEED for Core and Shell v2.0 Registered Project Checklist L [ [ D Project Name: Crosstown Medical Building - Preliminary Project Address: 4010 West 65th Street, Edina July 23, 200E m�© Sustainable Sites 15 Poi s Prereq 1 Construction Activity Pollution Prevention Required Credit 1 Site Selection 1 Credit 2 Development Density & Community Connectivity 1 Credit 3 Brownfield Redevelopment 1 Credit 4.1 Alternative Transportation: Public Transportation Access 1 Credit 4.2 Alternative Transportation: Bicycle Storage & Changing Rooms 1 Credit 4.3 Alternative Transportation: Low - Emitting and Fuel- Efficient Vehicles 1 Credit 4.4 Alternative Transportation: Parking Capacity 1 Credit 5.1 Site Development: Protect or Restore Habitat 1 Credit 5.2 Site Development: Maximize Open Space 1 Credit 6.1 Stormwater Design: Quantity Control 1 Credit 6.2 Stormwater Design: Quality Control 1 Credit 7.1 Heat Island Effect, Non -Roof 1 Credit 7.2 Heat Island Effect, Roof 1 Credit 6 Light Pollution Reduction 1 Credit 9 Tenant Design & Construction Guidelines 1 GNU W,a er E,ffi_eje_rae: F ints 1 Credit 1.1 Water Efficient Landscaping: Reduce by 50% 1 1 Credit 1.2 Water Efficient Landscaping: No Potable Use or No Irrigation 1 1 Credit 2 Innovative Wastewater Technologies 1 1 Credit 3.1 Water Use Reduction: 20% Reduction 1 1 Credit 3.2 Water Use Reduction: 30% Reduction 1 Yes 7 No 3 2 3 :Q. o �� Yiti 3 Prereq 1 Fundamental Commissioning of the Building Energy Systems Required Prereq 2 Minimum Energy Performance Required Prereq 3 Fundamental Refrigerant Management Required 'Note for EAet: All LEED for Core and Shell projects registered after June 26th, 2007 are required to achieve at least two (2) points under EAct. 22 Credit 1 O timize Energy Performance 1 to 8 10.5% New Buildings or 3.5% Existing Building Renovations 1 2 14% New Buildings or 7% Existing Building Renovations 2 17.5% New Buildings or 10.5% Existing Building Renovations 3 21 % New Buildings or 14% Existing Building Renovations 4 24.5% New Buildings or 17.5% Existing Building Renovations 5 28% New Buildings or 21 % Existing Building Renovations 6 31.5% New Buildings or 24.5% Existing Building Renovations 7 35% New Buildings or 28% Existing Building Renovations 6 1 Credit 2 On -Site Renewable Energy 1 1 Credit 3 Enhanced Commissioning 1 1 Credit 4 Enhanced Refrigerant Management 1 1 Credit 5.1 Measurement & Verification - Base Building 1 1 Credit 5.2 Measurement & Verification - Tenant Sub - metering 1 1 . Credit 6 Green Power 1 continued... A ^ Yes ? No 1611 1 4 •1 7 1 1 1 1 No Prereq 1 Credit 1.1 Credit 1.2 Credit 1.3 credit 2.1 Credit 2.2 Credit 3 Credit 4.1 Credit 4.2 Credit 5.1 Credit 5.2 Credit 6 Storage & Collection of Recyclables Building Reuse: Maintain 25% of Existing Walls, Floors & Roof Building Reuse: Maintain 50% of Existing Walls, Floors & Roof Building Reuse: Maintain 75% of Interior Non - Structural Elements Construction Waste Management: Divert 50% from Disposal Construction Waste Management: Divert 75% from Disposal Materials Reuse: 1 % Recycled Content: 10% (post- consumer +' /z pre- consumer) Recycled Content: 20% (post- consumer +'/2 pre - consumer) Regional Materials: 10% Extracted, Processed & Manufactured Regionally Regional Materials: 20% Extracted, Processed & Manufactured Regionally Certified Wood Required 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Yes 7 4 0 0 r��-�. ,... - @MFft °IrL1ULLi7 QI 7 1 1 1 1 No Prereq 1 Prereq 2 Credit 1 Credit 2 Credit 3 Credit 4.1 Credit 4.2 Credit 4.3 Credit 4.4 Credit 5 Credit 6 Credit 7 Credit B.1 Credit 8.2 Minimum IAQ Performance Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS) Control Outdoor Air Delivery Monitoring Increased Ventilation Construction IAQ Management Plan: During Construction Low- Emitting Materials: Adhesives & Sealants Low - Emitting Materials: Paints & Coatings Low - Emitting Materials: Carpet Systems Low - Emitting Materials: Composite Wood & Agrifiber Products Indoor Chemical & Pollutant Source Control Controllability of Systems: Thermal Comfort Thermal Comfort: Design Daylight & Views: Daylight 75% of Spaces Daylight & Views: Views for 90% of Spaces Required Required 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Yes 3 2 4J ' 1 1 1 1 1 Yes 7 No 1341 4 117 Credit 1.1 Credit 1.2 Credit 1.3 Credit 1.4 Credit 2 • - Innovation in Design: Provide Specific Title: 40% Regional Materials Innovation in Design: Provide Specific Title: 95% Certified wood Innovation in Design:. Provide Specific Title Innovation in Design: Provide Specific Title LEED ®Accredited Professional • • 1 1 1 1 1 Certified: 23 to 27 points, Silver: 28 to 33 points, Gold: 34 to 44 points, Platinum: 45 to 61 points 4 Clinic Space # of Exam Patients Patients Active Patients Total Parking Rms Waiting /Room Leaving /Room / Rm Stalls 36 2.5 1 1 162 MRI Patients Patients Patients in Total Parking # of MRI Units Waiting Leaving MRI Stalls 2 2 1 1 8 Therapy Patients Patients Waiting / Leaving / Active Patients Total Parking # of Therapists Therapist Therapist / Therapist Stalls 4 2 1 2 20 Surgery Center Patients Patients in Pre. Patients in Active Patients Total Parking # of Rooms Waiting / Rm Op / Rm Post -Op / Rm / Rm Stalls 4 1 1 2 1 20 Staff General Office Clinic & Physicians MRI 28 93 3 A-6c Surgery Total Parking Therapy Center Stalls 7 16 147 Grand Total 357 Cross"town Med�ca� _ 1 Project ®j ect I tl tl Y ®• 9 Y 9 a 4i o Y T� Ji je,rl J1141 3 r ._ ?�00 CROSSTOWN MEDICAL TWIN CITIES ORTHOPEDICS J PAO it Rendering of South Elevation Molhagen Hansen Architectural Group I % 41 Y. Crosstown Medical Office Buidling `"<gre I, i7#.F , tDeveloprnent Application Edina, Nlinnesou:, Revised May 20th, 2008 P 6UIL0►A)C ELCU14T �m Mohagen Hansen Crosstown Medical Office Building Final Development Application Architectural Edina, Ni!{'1;1e50C,� July 17th, 2003 Group FIIV,+L PAP �R�LIM1 UAK i rL1tN D «v IV t.1 vTc9un i� J01- -40— • s a nwnA • • v z EAST ELEVATION Alo /u•�r -n. ,uu v..-�r_a NORTH ELEVATION - PfZFGIMI?JAPY PLAID QV<<or>v4 g= WEST ELEVATION qua Vo-=r -o• rar w�a r.aa' i[m rr n.un � ■nnsnwa nvis u Rt'[ T JON a p p HIGHWAY 02 tNT 1 1 PROJECT SITE -' 4010 65th STREET WEST 0 2onrnq � �lassdir_aflnn POO -1 rin 30092824140,10.4 Address: -2010 651'H ST tN z - ST vv .85TH � �J — m m' m tti O. rn Lrn 66TH 57 W FAIRVIEW HOSPITAL 6401 FRANCE AVENUE SOUTH FAIRVIEW WEST RAMP PARCEL 6400 FRANCE AVENUE Zoning APD (Aulumobile Parkhig District) 14DD -4 (Mixed DeveluprnenL District -4) ■ 14DD -5 (Mixed Development Dlslrict -5) ® RDD -6 (Mixed Development Dlslrlcl -6) Park PCD -1 (Planned Commercial DlsLricL -1) 13CD -2 (Planned Commercial Dlslrlcl -1) PCD -3 (Planned Curnmerclal 01sl.ricl -3) ® PCD -4 (Planned Commercial DlsIALL -4) PID (Planned Industrial DlstrlLL) POD-1 (Planned Office District -1) POD -2 (Planned Office Dlslrlcl -2) ■ PRO -1 (Planned Resident D1slr1cl -1) PRD -2 (Planned RuslocnL Dlslrld-2) D PRD -3 (Planned Resident District -3) ® PRD -4 (Planned Rcsidenl Districl-4) ® 11RD -5 (Planned Resider) District -5) PS R-4 (Planned Senlor Residence-4) R -1 (Single Ovvelling Unit Dlstrid) ® R -2 ( Double Dvielllog U01 Dlslrict) L I RMD (Reylnnal Medical District) Zoning- Background - Current _. June 30, 2008 r'Rnq -.'rOWN MEDICAL T TWIN CITIES ORTHOPFnICs Men Hansen Amhlle mile Gmup Project Location Objective: Create flexibility for future growth opportunities of medical services for Edina and the region. Limited Growth Opportunities: Fixed elements as permanent boundaries. Hwy 62, France Ave, Lake Cornelia Park Existing development that remains viable. Lack of open or underutilized sites within existing RMD. Comprehensive Plan Background j CROSSTOWN MEDICAL d a� Gateway to Regional Medical tl_ .w..._ Tt Aerial Photo of Existing Context & France Avenue - enhanced by skyway link to ramp Highway 62 Residential District (R1) Fairview Southdale Campus Proposed Regional Medical District (RMD) West 66th Planned Office District (POD) Lake Cornelia Park Retail (PCD -3) West 70th , .l June 30, 2008 'U1►T J IN CITIES OR Mohagen Hanson /I,101POwal crzn�y. DICS C:y 20' SETBACK I' CtIOSSTOWN MUDICAL lw 6L PROJECT 5'SETBACK �44 ,'jj LOCATION 'BANK FAIFVIEW RAMP AMP FAIRVIEW ai SQUTI-lf ALE CORNELIA p CLACI r COMFIER AL POINT � ram" N EC' =w� 66TH STREET WEST WTI F f ,,"istinn, Regional S�ito. Plan I, I -T TWIN CITIES ORTHOPEDICS "olliage Hansen Hans OLVA N I Anchitedural UWE Group June 30, 2008 .�._ x , r fi t4, .s, 1. , ......... .w+W "'—�° �i{ - Al , r v d , • � :.. .. — .. _.. _ �' �' –�- yy' TWIN CITIES ORTHORFUIC5 Sw"- _. s�.F 14 �. Nlohayen MATO .'F.ji�nsen Site and Surrounding Context (Looking South) f „ a,c,,nt` W .1. 4 June 30, 008 ITe In zP Site Photos - Fairview Ramp and Site, from Highway 62 ". +s, , - —_- Fairview Ramp Cornelia Place Apartments Cell Tower Project Site CROSSTOWN MEDICAL T TWIN CITIES ORTHOPEDICS Men Hansen A-hifeclural (irtnip June 30, 2008 1-75 Site Photos - Fairview Ramp Entry - - - - - - . . . . . ... Fairview Ramp Exit Fairview Ramp Entry Project Site .,JO, 22 W June I CROSSTOWN MEDICAL T TWIN CITILS ORTHOPEDICS Men Hansen Awlilleclutal Group Site Photos -- Existing Building Cell Tower Bank Project Site Cornelia Place Apartments Parking rpoS51'OWN MEDICAL T TWIN CITIES ORTHOPEDICS Men Hansen Awhiteclufal Group Group June 30, 2008 Site Photos - Bank affigav" CROSSTOWN MEDICAL T TWIN CITIES ORTHOPEDICS A,, hileclu,R1 Group June 30, 2008 Site Photos - Cornelia Place Apartments Cornelia Place Apartments Parkin Project Site Bank Site June 30, 2008 CROSSTOWN MEDICAL T TWIN CITIFS ORTHOPEDICS Men Hansen Archifechual Group — .. -xar CROSSTOWN MEDICAL TWIN CITIES ORTHOPEDICS Mohagen q� Hansen W /�l CIIIIP coup Group Ewe 7 6DOO. 600 CA WMVFpfkWFJ CONGA 949" High Ground Water conditions require that the foundation be "sunk" or held clown by II a thick concrete mat. jHIGH GROUND WATER DESIGN ELEVATION — = 867' [ — — — -- — — — — — rob 00 F1 6 Miuk? Existing Ground Water Condition SSI_,C) SI-9 Fls SI-5 NI-7 FF FI el non Ilrnnu P,ujud 111,117-115510 R It A RN PA amn C11141ou'Ev", 11 1 ION C""I.... W.11-1 Vi— It A %%".16511, X".." INTERTEC Rine 30, 2003 TTWIN CITIES ORTHOPFUICI Mohagen Hansen AfrMfectmal Group I. SI-9 Fls SI-5 NI-7 FF FI el non Ilrnnu P,ujud 111,117-115510 R It A RN PA amn C11141ou'Ev", 11 1 ION C""I.... W.11-1 Vi— It A %%".16511, X".." INTERTEC Rine 30, 2003 TTWIN CITIES ORTHOPFUICI Mohagen Hansen AfrMfectmal Group Mohagen Crosstown Medical Office Building L' �` Hansen dune 30th, 1008 Architecture � L_�� i C' I�aj N Grout Twin. Cities Orthopedics ' Actual Pro ected Parkin Proof of Parking Scheme Building Size: 75,017 GSF Base Scheme + 33 Stalls Parking Provided + 59 Stalls Parking Ratio: N/A Parking Provided Parking (8' -6" W. Stalls + 12% Parking Parking Calculations 9' -0" Wide Stalls Surplus compact) surplus e ASC - 20 Stalls (3rd Level) (Includes Partial Lower Level Parking) Typical Medical S ace - - e MRI - 8 Stalls (1st Level) Building Size: 75,017 GSF Base Scheme (5 Levels): 390 - 3 Stalls Base Scheme (5•Levels): 416 + 23 Stalls Parking Ratio: 1:200 + Physicians 75,,017 GSF =_200 = 375 + 18 = 393 Stalls _______ _ Modified Schemej4 Lev_els1:_373__ ___ =20 Stalls____ 393 Stalls Required Includes Partial Lower Level Parkin Twin. Cities Orthopedics ' Actual Pro ected Parkin Building Size: 75,017 GSF Base Scheme (5 Levels): 390 + 33 Stalls Base Scheme (5 Levels): 416 + 59 Stalls Parking Ratio: N/A Program Area Modified Scheme (4 Levels): 373 + 16 Stalls e ASC - 20 Stalls (3rd Level) (Includes Partial Lower Level Parking) e Clinic - 162 Stalls (2nd Level) - e MRI - 8 Stalls (1st Level) e Physical Therapy - 20 Stalls (1st Level) _ e Staff_ 147 Stalls jincludeg physidan sJ------ 357 Stalls Required CROSSTOWN MEDICAL 1 -Presentation Goals I• -Twin Cities Orthopedics i - Project Objectives i . -Zoning Background -Comp Plan Background - Existing Regional Plan - Existing Context, -Transit Connections i •Existing.Conditions •Design Investigation 1 - Project j'. -Regional Site Plan -Landscape Plan. Building Plans *Building Elevations 1 -Site Sections ■Building Images - Parking Evaluation - Calculations -Plan Variations I -Facade Variations (JE TWIN CITIES ORTHOPEDICS Parking Evaluation - Calculations ""Ha�se� Architecture, Final Development Application J °—p July 21, 2008 --- '- --- 'r- -- - -- ---- OFF LOT 2 BLOCK I LEGEND jr o -~-~ __~~ � NOT FOR comsrooconm ONE CALL ` I a � 8 � 9 S 1. —APan rare a£/•POPS K raerRe mppalMly aeJ Vlmn[e •e 91Pw, M m.— To T119 PUP Reef 10 [1L•vPOx/r ,eIMCnOr IIE Q,PM(DI SP•I�H IP�OnI® MI[0416�Pan usa3vxars u¢ raPO. x. EverrucTOP sx•IE awmiPlrt ulllrs ¢ PEUwNS wen waosm IwPOPnFPrs ua rmn pElieT caaiPw ¢ Eaea,O IppVprplNT¢e ro Palul, rplmAOrTle SPILL eC PESPa,9 uE•oA E 1cnPO pe PB[ w ®e�i tdempCPON.(9101 A4 rp¢e. San, J. CP! 5�x ry w�10¢EIIal,wp W P93�PEIlWH9.n0. �P��e PEUIINm u pT SPNi eE P£4'a.swE rW TDOaOx•na, wM UTIVR PPewpERe rai 13uWL •. •rm�`�oc•TaP ¢ nsnxc umlllES •rrEC3a ar srt ¢e¢oPUwr. ru PFxmTs .PR,GPO,S •Pe iTFS IP[ mE PETpITewUR ¢ ,TTE C0.1n•CrtF. P .uoem n, .Poor moo ar .•r RPTn ro •coumnoP ¢ .Poo, mneT. e. PO Mrc •lLwe[p d faRwCw Pn 1 Real To -1-.o RPIn59al mw IuP.3w oewTlsPP. ,. w ra PC •�rm�TVmlcw.owTs om.�nnE+r (pia.ax, mea j.� A- rm oTr ¢ �TP•CTaT exNt meeaP13 rti MP wPm, ,e1NC PIWn a w•, wen ary ¢ mw• e_ PTIet� MPs oEV•P-7. �. u mo a.cE slw eE PF•an ax ory s,T3En 1. •csoPOUI¢ +m mE on b Pm.. alv. wpprp. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL T.M alr a.p esl- ue -000z u,,. Tel r,.. �- eoo -nx -Ilea m� uac i s, RTOPwry uPr. (Tw) II / I ( 1 PPORLT pnTelo I 9Tal. CLwEP IMF Ills GnN nI.PM I aPePC C914VPICPaI (rent p I` Ci JUN 3 0 7° X NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PrxPao w 3 w wu w o..n a.sm ove+ma gain ua. r' �.•s n - _ wuwm uo oeu 3awFp eons REMOVALS i PLAN CII\TY SUBMITTAL EDINA CROSSTOWN Removal Legend MEDICAL LLC ®m moomeu aTre • wrrtP EDINA CROSSTOWN lw r`v,Pl PI— MEDICAL BUILDING r•3P uuP 4010 65th STREET W. CAS �.— Imanaar,o zlECrwc Fuclwc EDINA, MN —�— ov[m�E•o —�— u.orna.aMO rFZ�POPE —�-- ewP3•o rtvRTaPz —,w— mIRro3 nern arP: rTn¢ �- o anlloPglp ® e1ADA'c Mohnn x n'¢ uwT PuE Hen"aen y r x ITnc srcM Oa6mUCircP1 Blpwux w w sm eewPO Founvl 113E 11PC n,d�Pecelpr R a,wm i� ,� �1 mrP, ^PI M sN a5 m� uac i s, RTOPwry uPr. (Tw) II / I ( 1 PPORLT pnTelo I 9Tal. CLwEP IMF Ills GnN nI.PM I aPePC C914VPICPaI (rent p I` Ci JUN 3 0 7° X NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PrxPao w 3 w wu w o..n a.sm ove+ma gain ua. r' �.•s n - _ wuwm uo oeu 3awFp eons REMOVALS i PLAN CII\TY SUBMITTAL 3 8 6 a Site Development Summery Parking Summary ■ 9rt A°PE55'. °mp eem Sw[[I w[St vnpvpgp vMpxp Jl] STMLS/ srt AREA• ez,n. s (ioi AaESJ rrtamtm rAmwc' Jes sous. Ens Rxp gECxIDAa: °0.r5p 9 (.e.np I M0.1iR[D rq°t*L'p UsC. r � J5x STALLS nipvpSID gaxIDAa J.N0.1MC5 aa: Rpa • 3. N . RE !e1! �° rE xvrpOi90M9 . X! STAl15 RE W�Rf➢ QSnxp EgNO: nANlE9 pETla P511nCT (vW -r) vPgpSEO xoMPp: nEOMM YEprpM oRIMCT twoJ nipxT J5 q eNp. xT. M' P[M mSN[ On BrDp. xT, r0 mgOSEp u4' wEprCAt onKi xpp EAALp.rp g,w.ER I I F;lrr To M rrp 1 �e•' 4_S m nnn m .�sz n,nnNp CC P A R K I N 13 r T 1 Y I z T 71— �.II .or IT, 1 —T l] / vn ogo so[wux w Z � AT[ N�IIP°AC°Niq° 9400°LL f 9R muwp UilO�isA6u vmtn Lo°NA— P�Wq M r AVA1IW /t]6RnRROt_ r My osCl2vM S Mr r¢IEq. TE eMxriA sxpLLD eE xOTe1ED enEMATar. ]. ALL PuEwSfoxs ARE ro IA¢ OF uw■ q FJnEMq rAa a ermwrp UrEF59 pn[PwSE WTEn. .. R6EP ro AROPTECNPM v1M19 rq CMCT RUAewp ­IS ANp LOCAepx4 4 W R. nAUVg Axo TPVq ppOti S ALL 0.RIe RM)e ARE WAU K 5.0 — Iro IAa q N9e) Ip165 pneww5[ xplm. e. o�wa�Ano anw w w Jc AvPau�ry srr'rw. � seas rB°Mrris�§nanorsE°R °:ot4moTm. .0 x. M CR11mACR1 SHML a SSnoxSlaL rtes RIp'.Oxp Awo YAMTMIINC IRAIIIC I.SNTRpL oE.,m arw M aMreurrs wAmmc srNS. o�cnwM 9a.s, nn S Arm ugrs ro A0. TIE uPRUFNI or iRATC rNFnC NEC[SSARr. M@rpn q MFSE pEr,ELS 9uLL eE r�Xannovm " - rr uo wcMmz rmq ro rsw¢ugl. moot IbxrR¢ oE.,¢5 suLL EoxraRr .nArt uxool sArzpAl■s arnr nE aootr�o«c. wO�irvro, °C w AaLnpAxR wm nt °°ts rM m A°�.mrorinpEaT. ow¢m A a i aPSOPrnnrs. Mo r:rw�AU . ..tors xE¢ rp. xp w011P ALLprm M YMpf MINT V w°r PRrpn ro AWN9Ra q w.ppT ISnnrrrT. ® Sign Legend eta ewN w . a - HAxorcwn AaEemac tr e v rro 1-1 W nix• ne -Je �wvwsm — a/ xp.p' xp. I 1 nesTwc muc. ou�°uv teas Mohaaen Hentsen nrowreen,,.r w_V ■ SWw pgllx uRRJI M Vr5 w i p� i U9r. L516) n� r mwn b- � Q .l exwnrt "�jn o osnsrpr dq A w R[r+ to _. t gf� JUN 3 0 509 � s % 15 s¢.AU At met ,owT V urt�Anp I�MFPry Rwr>� soEwxu ro m NOT FOR CONSTRUCnON PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN 'UBMITTAL C3 b GOPHER STATE ONE CALL . wr- sA -oppz Tm nR r- eop- :J: -rree w,. EDINA CROSSTOWN Site Legend MEDICAL LLC Egon _ _ � — — — ePgUry lNC Lpt UxE ° ""E EDINA CROSSTOWN -- ----- uauExt uxE MEDICAL BUILDING Al LESa 4010 65th STREET W. .nrnc •+� EDINA, MN rEJ+a CggFTE vAA(u[rvT O � WxgEIE SREwAtn Q Mgx0.15 PAVC•E -T Ou NW9EN 6 vMRNO STALLS � mAxMOnREn • • srt wrmrc eoLLMro � vost p _ nesTwc muc. ou�°uv teas Mohaaen Hentsen nrowreen,,.r w_V ■ SWw pgllx uRRJI M Vr5 w i p� i U9r. L516) n� r mwn b- � Q .l exwnrt "�jn o osnsrpr dq A w R[r+ to _. t gf� JUN 3 0 509 � s % 15 s¢.AU At met ,owT V urt�Anp I�MFPry Rwr>� soEwxu ro m NOT FOR CONSTRUCnON PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN 'UBMITTAL C3 11.0' Site Development Summary S1E AODRE�; A010 651H STREET NEST 511E AREA: 97.794 Sr (202 ACRES) EKISTINC GREENSPACE: 40,150 SF (45.711) PROPOSED OREENSPACE: 77.591 Sr (42.0 .MCLUDES CREEN ROOF EMSRNG ZONING: PANNED OFFICE DISTRICT (POD -1) PROPOSED ZONING: REGIONAL MEDICAL DISTRICT (RYO) SETBACK REOURENENTS: BUILDING PARKING FRONT 3S' OR BLDG. H7. 20' REAR 2V 10' 510E 20' OR RLDO, HT. 10' PROPOSED USE MEDICAL OFFICE BUILDING SUE! 73.341 CST Y Z Q Q] 10.3' Genoal Site Notes PaMna S PROPOSED PARKING: 373 STALLS# REOURED PARKING: 365 STALLS- PROOF OF PARKING SUMMARY OF 357 STALLS REWIRED, FOR TCO USE. . REOUREMENT: 73,340 / 700 - 367 367 + 16 PHYSICIANS - 365 57ALLS REOUIRED 1. BACKO ROUND IMORBATION FOR THIS PROJECT PROMDED BY WESTWOOD Pg0FE59111 SEHIIICES. 2. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF [709140 TOPOCRAPNY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN M THIS PLAN ARE �CAVATION/CO/L9AIRIIC7ION. ANK 1715fREPANCl ARE FOUND, THE ENGINEER SHOULD BE CU NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY. 3. ALL O6tUMO,4 ARE TO FACE OF CURB W FKTFRIOR FACE Or BIAU7NC LUHI.ESS OTHERWISE NOTED t. OFFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EIULCT SUILDNG DIMENSIONS AND LOCAROMS OF EJOT9. RAMPS: AND TRUCK DOGIIi R(GO'HO sET6AcKs s +� Us�a 6�sEn ON N6►6N7 PROPOSED FENCE/ SCREEN WALL 3.3' 20.4' Li EXISTING CONC. SNOW DUMP (L g Q 3. W SIDEWALK AT FRET JOINT BEYOND PROPERTY LINE TAPER t. PROPOSED SIDEWALK TO �\ V YA1W Genoal Site Notes PaMna S PROPOSED PARKING: 373 STALLS# REOURED PARKING: 365 STALLS- PROOF OF PARKING SUMMARY OF 357 STALLS REWIRED, FOR TCO USE. . REOUREMENT: 73,340 / 700 - 367 367 + 16 PHYSICIANS - 365 57ALLS REOUIRED 1. BACKO ROUND IMORBATION FOR THIS PROJECT PROMDED BY WESTWOOD Pg0FE59111 SEHIIICES. 2. LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF [709140 TOPOCRAPNY AND UTILITIES AS SHOWN M THIS PLAN ARE �CAVATION/CO/L9AIRIIC7ION. ANK 1715fREPANCl ARE FOUND, THE ENGINEER SHOULD BE CU NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY. 3. ALL O6tUMO,4 ARE TO FACE OF CURB W FKTFRIOR FACE Or BIAU7NC LUHI.ESS OTHERWISE NOTED t. OFFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EIULCT SUILDNG DIMENSIONS AND LOCAROMS OF EJOT9. RAMPS: AND TRUCK DOGIIi R(GO'HO sET6AcKs s +� Us�a 6�sEn ON N6►6N7 PROPOSED FENCE/ SCREEN WALL 3.3' 20.4' Li EXISTING CONC. SNOW DUMP (L g Q 3. W 3 e s ti l Erosion Control Notes 1. SILL m— MLL . MSIAIILD MM11]D 92 A, ALL nLL aq[AS AND IOCA— — MMM -q. RUNp) MAY LEAK MC 92. R,IM ro m' EACANAPM/CA.SMUCPM ACPNPES 1 MDOI CMSIRUCMN ENMAM¢ TAIL FIE I—ILED AT ALL CMSM — E TRANCES. J. � TME — CIPAA. ME —TAAC SNP USE Ku2KP UNE CSn MQ95A -1 TC — E'I-- — —AMU wQUMNC Dlla �h x01 Uw1ED CAT. BA9. SEAR, U.— MMAxCEi EPD9M —CL M•ANAEI, 9L rvl¢- CMM0. SN41 Mllu[xLL M WMAND AIA C MILIE PMWCHMT ME MOAC1 UNnL ACCEPTANCE M ME NMI BY ME DYMEA. ME <MMACIM'S RE9•M90NIY W-5 ALL MPIEUENIAPM As REMMED 10 PRESENT MD9M AND IIIE DEPD9MC Q 91.1. ME D— MAY MRCCI ME CIAIMACTM(S EMMS AS E.— TIT TO PROTECT PRMEATY AND IUPAOKUENR. A-T OCPD9PM 6 -1 M MIA M .Ew M En5M0 PAKARAT M N C.17A. M— SLP[NS M SHALES SHALL DE AE.D- AIPA EACH R4x —C.1 AM. 91ALL DC -- ro THE SAPS AMAI ME E MII . ALL AT ME —EMSE 6 ME — MACIM. TE MP.. ER05MN —TMX SHALL M IB — BY E CMMAC,M I IS AM191M, A. ­CC— SHALL mIT— TEIAPMAMY MI ET "CIEC"M (W.M M EM —ENr) AMAMD ALL C— BASM MATE RRETS, A EnI BY MS ( S. A.0 —A— AREAS AITMED DK ro CMS —ECU ACPNPE1 MUST 0. IIESP)Rm MIM SEID AMO uIILM. SW. P9DD rBER MAM21 M R RD 9MrAC[ wMM z PEns v LYAp1EPM v wlsmucnM. e- rM AREAS MM 4M[ M J'1 M --. IB'S -A— wM SM M wOm IN2q BLAxNE, IS PEOUN2D, 1. II1iF 5M¢,S USED rM .AIRNC SHALL BC B[vT M[[ O 500. Axp DlIDai SMELT SAECPMC — BE COURE2D DAIL, e. STAP•P s.AL1. ac cMMelm AxD .—S RRMI 91AU e< ACOIM2o IPAP ro A— CA— nn e,n O IMICN M ^IX �F. •� e,EU ] aJ -- v �, - I -1 8 i 4 —STORY - dl lj PARKING RAMP e d /I/ E, UA -• e� Grading Legend r�mm BHM64L �Be)_ mrtevA1. cMTDUR A ) AAD CU A —... — PMD xMUAI wA TEA L[v¢ .� —M TaPM QIMR r1.ARm CMD eECPM (Mix MPRAP) - — MA,pI M4x .— eAM1MY SEwCA .— REI4xMD .AIL • ® TAMIMAPM MIM4Ia f� zA®w COrIM01. ,RAMxET 9`01 u[vAPM 'j°° RIAr WIE<PM, ]t ,M AIA eonw v REIAmMC AALL - CSRAOCNCT OvEPRM M w -. $ BMPxC LTP:APOx OO ePLI R102CDM — 7 CVPB N - MW MT APEA .STALL mini PRD2c= ui�MnmPE.T., MM M51 St— 4 lT� ° MASI"LLCCSSAPTRP I. 10 OuurN." I ar SA! rtA[E MADNC CPET]ATWS (TM) mP) oLMeu it M (M4ME AREAS rm) CMM)IUmnIA ID .1 w001 • ux001 MMT R NA• a � v.• 1-0 e P � S MEDICAL OFFICE 73,340 S.F. 4 STORIES AM FFE= 876.00 sAA CUf - •• _ M,wmous AIMD e� SME� �b ggg� r � .n.,"1 E 1 CPe b .dn I.';e NIBRS,a' GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Mw e3,- x3. -DDD) Grading Notes 1, .,.A,. AND ELCVAPDNS fI .11M0 TOPDMAP.Y AND DUBS AB SNOM. I AIM FY AAE CURE- I1 CMMACPA SM41 IIIO KART SITE Cpq PMS A. , UPUIT 91 LL BC . xAIEDIA,Fl� .1 DISMEP 11 9E xFEP O D MACIM6 SHALL FERN M APMITECNRAL PLArS IM i PA "MCM,M,, O0f oMOI[S MRUM�s TMRUCR DRit3 PNFOg BUBOMC S. E Mi CAACI BUI{De1C MSA R IN . pCAnMi AxD [TACT IACAPM4 arlD MNBER ti DOMDYMIIS. J NE CNCAVAIAM 9141 E m AM.OAAMR 'M ME CMPIpT EMPM M - SIANDAIIp 9'NnISA1NP5 ITA Mpgl [RGVAMN a¢ CITY fWCP 5 A­EYAMM S I ET PM' AS uMM9J1A�PAPm P° A. ALL o lllne<J) -- AACAS ARE ro AE. — mnAS s0. ANO SW M —, PAS A Al S.ALL BE wA 2PED ,E MY SI— V MA53 IS MIANED. SEE lANO— PLAN rM rEANPMO AND IURI "'A --,. _ 1. D2 CMMACTM — . PE9•ORHLE IM NIONOMC Ab yI . 0. DCNRS SUM AS BAPMCARS. MAMOND 9MIe. MREC... .MME. AND UM Irt ro CMM0. PTE .—fM1 M MA— MDM MERSSART. 7> PO '_T Q 1.C5[ -`—T-- BE APPNOKD BY 1NE •° 9141 MMI— M AwRDmRA2 IIN001 1721'E ]e¢5 e. WIMAC,OR SHALL UMRMNLY MAf2 4QA9 wAA] UM5 6 MADMO 4A PADVAE A SMDOM TM91CD 9AOAQ NM M BEIYF.EM E91M PMMIS BNp EIS. [ �O Ms ME 9roell O ) [�A mN6 SxOMI PMCA2 Re94D PAKLENT ETN ). A ,Tpl rtPe Lm[ V,AID OPIpwY MO2D. vAVaz)n mxiDlMS ARE ro rNl9lED 9mrA¢ MARL e. ffi SMS PEPM1, IM PIAME rT INMmES A- xMA 9 .. o IIE9PT "C�A�I— e A Umr)E 'M � ��vCo.ALnrM"�w(En ALL CMSP I— SHALL ,mDnll ro IDEAL STATE AAD i ID. IEyE11At MA6 NMDDNC ME .IT1MA1 I0.1UTA.1 —A— 1 RMNAPM $YSTEL INPDESI T2PIn1 PEMMIEI4)IA. LL SDIS AIA MATE.— ,EB,MD 91ALL BE COMPLL2p BY Ax T. VPP:PCMDMT ---CAL LN411fER. --I- fTM PIE PNMpSL Q REUONND IREIS VL M UHSMTAAL sMlS 91ALL BE CMRETED AS PCONNFD BY PIE LTOTECNMCAL p1MMFA. MC CMMACTMI 914E BC MESPM— IM —AMD ALL Kw— SM9 -IS — .—CPU' MM PTE fEDTEMMICAL i E--. o_ Q i W 9 ¢ $ k 1 n JUN A x NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th STREET W. EDINA, MN w ..hag .n Hanse Hn (AMm I IMM n M. A4 IN] nM w" n MUmle Man mB1ssDM MIT .::� Ri D.s M peAMCA ] rNel A, uwB .mea sRPU �� M` M"eOpMIS o wuD AMA PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 'UBMITTAL C4 I t e GOPHER STATE ONE CALL nr. ��vr4.a es�sd -aoa� EDINA CROSSTOWN General Utility NGtw MEDICAL LLC � 1 mE cP/1e.c,m a SRai1LYlT [W11P2D m.l 112 I-- /oi atv.nPl V CA51ele Vwms V 6NOr1 w TN[a H.NS BASED w PE1n09 ¢ UE V40m9 UrzI,V E91PµR9 41D .Q HDT BE 12VLD w .9 BFMO Eucf m Evuncrz. ra mxm.cTm =jT 56.91eEYd1e ,µd x DIE fIUD. ra xraw.nw s m um EDINA CROSSTOWN Y mmmmcm@NSp �rosTxurnw MEDICAL BUILDING 2 41 S.4TMT SISd. Simll SEYC1t µD w.Tp, N4N xT43ADw9 sN.0 eE rEn xwEmu vlwexD aDE dxD x .aw1D41¢ xm 4070 65th STREET W. mE mavnl EPDPI ¢ •srµsue �Ealc.nws rDY w.rta u.x .nD son+¢ UNE xm4unw .nD T.1 ¢11d .xD 9,PP sn6Y x5,4LTWN• is Pad46D a• ra arr mmlans �v +llw v wrxESDTw EDINA, MN ro lamwcTlw. ra mllTwmTm sN.0 mT4x ra '. rlimswr rmm4. s1.rt un lDaa vdan ra ra mwasm Pa w w v nvv rm ra Drml a ETS]xiDl m.r rvmn N.vc mYx4:IP1�I1MI55 OMUra m.w¢D x�m ra 0Y1EN6 ra ea NA01maaA mc— e1FAFFAU [ILCmC ¢V1mKTIN 9141 e1riA ro eeaslEClueAL illxs reY E4cT ~ lDC.11w 41D t:l T! Da.VIwAM s4ae. TPUIX mOIA g2mE a4pYC PY9l9P14 .NO U.CI PMxD UwT' EpinECTNI �S w lcdl,SM a NL Tsev.rt UM6 SNNL � mrsTleleTO! x ecom4l¢ xm ra 5);ST4,p5 D ra rrrler9.rz Vrz1TV mYPdT. 116 m,NY.c,w 9141 mEVe}l.rt ra 9AMS U6 mxSTMlcew xm ems/ MohaBen ra urem ryv4¢s a mxm W 1m 9141 m,4x 41 I(,2S9MT ary rvmn ITA urnrn Hama. mxYECrlals .ND uruTO sN41 ff xsvECrm 40 .voeD+m n 112 on sN.0 er NDlam .e -uPms Dies ro aPdlece°°1 ra Prt. mwmme: rm T,2 uwT+ mismlCDP1 m 41r 1¢cTxm OvFAAIE Mffw[IQ wM E4lRC, 0PP ,ESlV14 (pTp4',m 9r41 ,ID, .wv rx m lrosE Tam 1w .xT a,Ex wow anne¢lc ro T12 .DVOaE 0 u. - '^ "°� ~ 6�` on aria mET 411NPeTm ro 11D sD e. ra art. �DUdI¢s ¢ so�nm m wsominID m9nrnws v wml ovm w lie ww rs Noe®T 2 P Um P mtl aan¢ ro >K wax 4¢ ro a: ra lv_aew9airy v 116 mY,Y.ciPl. ,Q Y4w IDIDMS AS 910M NE .sEwDw.rz NaeiwlW '. iixclNS 41m rm .DDI11wW elrE r211 Drsr4Eero w sans a vraMSa. In w I r E naf uvsm qP ®r pp�lml spa 'e[ UR Y 1°OUi2 .iaYUY mumaiEDraer T r9'ul"u6 w =A wisiciAmx w.aTEnxu1pi armwv x ao• rt 1o�Ya erp EIIW xr� coxsTRVC,Yx. e �.,lE�n YPV+ a�xcs�vm s�xir.'me sx.�a aeY sr�aYEnAl � ul.�m vu Y la caw ev uos v w wvmr non v ®w. ( 9. um" != TKIU11r rtexaart Y m19m euemrD w41 »ran 9° ®,m m,P� - UrL55 DI16wra SNPx m ND,CD. aPN10e O.rOOSS - • lv. ul Y.TOOw sN41 m1vEr xm 116 eEam¢lmin a ra on. n ®via Pa r.-n Ynm ( ,1. °1p"YPIY01PEw v 3 a r°�a+ mourn D4n2ndg wPOEim. eumwED011C.,�il ` 41 S T— g� sv1Ya FlPE I- K Yle Sm -m uwm I Dnawa Nmm. li A. M @N.�, v' PlmexD Ne YO n MrPY MT PmP ( IesieEl.eeel). �, WYIRM:TDR 9141 Y.xT4Y .e -9Ua1 r1AN9 DiRPICXDVI 1 mXSmIICDPI µ0 EUaYT rasr PIAN9 ro doNLd IAPI cDYglDw 6 ,OIR. Utility In-d EffiaW � -- - - -- -- - [dmox N6 ails .rm w„d 9µITMV 4YEA 9.IIII.M 6frA •0e¢ Y.x �M � �� -y -�� S,pN al,d w.TEw Y4Y NxrUlil Pa w ro _y_ IOEII 9 ea NA01maaA mc— e1FAFFAU [ILCmC OTC Ywm1PIPMD 1oDVIP2 TOeGD IE,8VIV2 mwrN Pxlon vGIA 3 10J yQN Q 3 : : a 1F1D11PE 1 ®1 TIC Glai 1o159w r N® EYD eEEmw m' PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN ® CITY SUBMITTAL C5 I 3 e 8 Id 1' peg A I "—... -- 8161 d meliSQ'��1 Ir Sy[ l�n M1 L wlea +mom En �. a � rv� �l�•' mom. L� .nrtvnu. ® m LwP. .p,. i. ,n• m -mm- 4-1 e9e .a nwn sera. ae9�P OOPHETi STATE ONE CALL r n my 9..9 em- .a. -aeoz u.. r9n ne. r- eeP -zaz -nee JUN J G 7n EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 651h STREET W EDINA. MN M nw ensen laPw i nw. mm eP as m+ e6 mrPm P . P Pon P Paa an9e9w, w eei � .. m. u¢.an w.amw Dean um M uw a Pr s.n a mxm bAStT{91 a�P.0. �W WW 9810. a_rvP •Ie0e w rq l9¢al k9eI0.Pf P aaPn GENERAL DETAILS LIBMITTAL �,, C6 ra :l 1' peg A I "—... -- 8161 d meliSQ'��1 Ir Sy[ l�n M1 L wlea +mom En �. a � rv� �l�•' mom. L� .nrtvnu. ® m LwP. .p,. i. ,n• m -mm- 4-1 e9e .a nwn sera. ae9�P OOPHETi STATE ONE CALL r n my 9..9 em- .a. -aeoz u.. r9n ne. r- eeP -zaz -nee JUN J G 7n EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 651h STREET W EDINA. MN M nw ensen laPw i nw. mm eP as m+ e6 mrPm P . P Pon P Paa an9e9w, w eei � .. m. u¢.an w.amw Dean um M uw a Pr s.n a mxm bAStT{91 a�P.0. �W WW 9810. a_rvP •Ie0e w rq l9¢al k9eI0.Pf P aaPn GENERAL DETAILS LIBMITTAL �,, C6 � nniTinir_ eCUFTII II F GREEN ROOF SCHEDULE 131 MINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC MINA CROSSTOWN MMIC4 BUILDING 4010 65th STREET W. MINA, MN L sen �� een '`i'"1 nmr ow o� 8� �1ae Y�R FI/f01� O ®! tYCYt�1 PREUMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN & SCHEDULE ® CITY SUBMITTAL. L1 1 !I I' GENERAL NOTES 1 { AIA9pWEWxOUGTOTNERAT UREnDSCOPEOFWORK EE/JRLWI wONFASxxO LUAROID EIARNG ro 1HE WNIE AND SmE 6 WpIX ] LAroTwE wxmACtaLawLVE rpv nAnurartAxo pmu lonlEArrExTn»I OE nE THE LA AR: ARCMTECr p5�Ax0ES WwawrLYE,MRBVSE nE BESpAM MIEM a THE uran ] LAxo5G4E CONI41Lrp16NELA5511NE BOEOMLE MIHAPRICABIECWE9 AID EBIAAnON9 aoVEMIRA011E]FpM AHp W113e119611PPLAT A L44WAPEGOMWnp191MLPROTEC7 EAS ROAMCIMBSGI]nEM MM5 TREES UNxs AeD 50E F1EYEM30UDN0tnrRlwI CT10N WEAAOON9 ONAAM TOSAAESMLLLE IEPAMED Ar xo AmmOW1 cosT ro THE oANEn 9 UABOVE G GRADE mH IMS A D 9H MNILGVVEE E THE EECEEMAAY N PO LOOTEC n FGR S w GEF O AHO mrTSrnucTwlrEpN3 RAMAMN IDaPAw+T>:1 e urmsuPECMTWC1w swl MDlmiNAiE nE MUS CSacarsTMlcrwx uoPLArFnxc NsrAIUMa WEDS DrIER COxiwlCroTD W Bmaw Ta u n M LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORSKAL PREPARE AND SIBwr AWMTTEN RE00EST FOR TIE SUBSrAMM mAWIEnax MSPECnwaPU ]IOSAPE MAISrTE Ie@TrovESExT9 PWplTO SIDw nO1G RNN. PAY RLaUEM. L] LVMWAP EWMWTORSMLROPMEAMSL ®Cr�EA3 MTDRAWMPI a UNWnPEaMALAOp1 .IWIGAMaATD91E� UPONCOPLETp!OF LA8iMlCTlplWALUWONAHlPnLIRroSMTN M]SEnpl GRADING NOTES 1 RWp1MAONGMADRNSHm oRAOn1GroBE BONE BYOREIB FILEM WIIEIE NOTED ] FRI/ LLTASECE39MYTOPROVDEA1 SwNMINGADEAWAYRMNSIRPN09WIM L TSWCONSTRUCnp! J SALVAE TOPSORrR041MEEMTITNAO .AREAS AAAPPPORRAlEOR ASGECTm BY LANOSUPE MCNTECT ALD BLOppIIE Fpi E VSE a LOGiDN APPROVEp BY pVlE/l. PLANTING NOTES I rggAN19WLLBEAS MMLM1RFPUl pLADDGAN0C0IbT1111CRMNA9BEEN LTDIgETEOM TIE AREwTe AIEA ] MWOSro FRAM WrFwQ 5HN1 LD1EEYwTro OE CLeaElTr mnM O<nEAAE1MAN MAIALVD FHMw1R5ERY STOpLAN9 EBO I, ulAES9xoTm DI1ERIFISE, Ep011009 SIeWMs sw1 rwvEn tFUr sGAmAT TrE sPECFmrEAMt. aTaALErAraTREFS NLEL wvE xo v pTOTOIES AxD 61ML BEGM BPArAHNO w LOaEii rHw1 r FEFT ABU'E TIE 8001 BML 61REET ND WUlEYA10 TREES 9MIBEGMBRN1drNGxolw�ER nLwrABOVE PAVEp 60MACE ] RA1R 8Y1@TAB pInIN OMWMG IIY ,E9w✓£CEOEMEOVFR nINI SUEDUIE% pSpEPMApESM pTAMRE9 FAST. SPEOFNARFM9MOOETMSIwE OECEE/AS!OVEit IDTFs A PROPOSED RIal w1EMNNMLSE IOGTEO AID SIMEDMSHOIINMRAN . LANDSCAPE M MCINIr97 APMIOVESTAA KMINATEWDRPMiOPGOMO. s xoRDRwrEwu suesnronpDwlLEACCEPTEDIFAFS9 rPPRwars wAM¢o er rNE 1A]AOSVPE ARwTEm To THE uxOSCAPE mIrIRIDTORROM ronE SuBLessA+a to LANDSCAPE CONTRAC SHALL WARR ANTY NEW RIM wTERM TNRCLM ONE CALENDAR TEARFROGTHEGTEOFSLNMR nALCOMLEIDN, NOPMPALACCEPTANLEWUSE mxSIDElm Ii I]4E59 NDTE90RERWISE, THE MPROMPAIE GTE9FOR SP4wDRANT wIEma N9TALURMMFRI]Y 111E r4E pigRp G9 nwwED roANE 19 11 cMPEna1D MAMwGw AL CEPIA$EIiLOC1a4Arylnroal0BER1 FAMMODUM RANRNGrs ALCEPIIEIE iApA RE xPSTFROSI N1RNmpDEl119 ADM111ENr910 RP9ATNro GIES uusr E APPROJ®a wA1TMG er TIE LAIDSTAPF ARMIECi. IRRIGATION NOTES I WDSGLPE COMPAmMSNMLEIIESPONSMLE FOR MIOWORAMMbGTIMUAA JI PLANMOnM rMMa A9PARInrNESCOVEm Wqw S MrORTO T R AND °iHFSARBNS FOR APwI WAl BY iNE LYNBO V E M W IEn RI'01110 ORDER UIWaO goDDEMICTTONRsWW.BEIIB:LAtBI RIANRUGTORS Y.NCMM ro M]11REB s000Fp'SEEOEOArD PIIYfIED AIEA9 wE MRiGrm PNOPEI4Y, MGU1pNG IHOSEAREA9 PTEPAIE BOIlFp1 NC1E iNE EIiDREBEO SEE SPEpRCARM ECTIM RFlA1FD roEATERMIPIANTMO ' TSILLM T NR ""Em , 9 — 'CONTACT Yrt1F S BIEN g 1r WHO BNO]91 FAEDO ) NOR Lvl SEEPWI ®GMCOI]111MVAME9.sB PLAN O WxTIU1GIpISwILEESPOxSIBLE EOVD. SEERM �--� 10R N4ANIM✓PAOIEE$MAPIUIM CAEAMfliOROMTwTFNI16NE1 „�-`r P05TIIMlIM011p101/i THE WWRANIY WYE 80018 MVDLOOSE4® i TCmPILCI® P9000. NIIAP IEEIMW60xlYV40N PUNTMO SIMFM BKOMS m p10MDLNLLC41. A14TDVHBYLAIDSI'AIEARIIIECT Nb fE6E111HW rDm GII �L roBEIU[FDDGY9 6EESKOFrARM SKNON RISAlEO JUN J ® IruMrsloESAroemrw6 ArIFAIiEE RANTRD roED1E1WNPVNINO - NgNplrimGBON EMIEEDWIINSPADE Br41AN0 BOO MNO MACH TOE EACH FREE SIML ERA FEDSUM � roerDWTIHRNE9DEFA LEVawnrl FrASHm m]nE. _ TERGY'R,'EnWSDLSAT J BHRUB PLANTING DETAIL LavSTUDm SUBGRADE , OONm MACE NRMM RIE lOP 0F1HEROm BALL rTrE r WIFTACTYIIIH 1REE rRUNI ROm FWESMm Yrs1EE THE SOI Arw]r •• - swuEtELavroMALE4L4wrwEn ��•.S 'L _ mTRD RMTm rRw nE ROOi BALL io WIERE TIE =� E '} IF rolMllaff LABS NNNOROEILROm�{'pA ON 4 I1YR9QIIEtKE9 8101 TIE rmAA4 ®,� ErNAW pDETI ROmI ME11M1 AI6S SI]?RAN MM5r1 GADE WxOt LOVER TD• EPERroPLwDHG C04mACr wAIRPIG OFRWrBN1rAT11 SOL RNANOp PI/Nr S paElEIIYUMIM0MMI10p131 Wlpell, ®I191G _ NOTE SOLMOPERCENT �p L,NE RMU5 EQ��roTSAW 1QlME® SEESPEC CTNM ESE P�IaO f sMFrPEx — POSTSA roA9rN 0eN MRIAf fORfO GY9 17 R/Ir11aO11p1E5 it FN9 ®fAAOE. rWLa 00X01 MACE NAM pIrEH]109T i---- iIDS, WIMsPAL�E B51'WVN EIOro FmE95� .. -flµ _ L�EW4 CON0TNM VNE9. SEE TUN _ r BRA4CIE9,IEFFR i0 RAx - -' �DRLOUTDre n4ES WNDMIII PIEPAIED SO4 moxc. aEPWA —.�— - 'nMrD0E0NA10WOW F. 1 PUMIIDMroE rvD OFBUU CMTNNOIGRBTM wTartE SHALL NAM gEAAAE VEGETAIDN. UNDI5T111DE050BpuE M FWE Pws TIE VwflER MWROOTSGNO LOOSENED P915PEC..86VE M91ALLM0 DMRPjgmmfror— - OFROOTG— SLOPED , TOPLANTMNOFE FR - ".E1FlARON NAM MAN IUMMB SOLiMPHEMMOF OEEiFRiNAN qOm BAU lILP9p4 MOL- R00TBNLGSE roPW1TR10 N0TE5 Ig1F 11EE MMIEC'RpI SIMLEPRONGED BYCONTRACTORIU IEWI®roENSNE SIMVNAHIIry tF IEWVEMIMIIP, rTME. RO4E AID FRELTIWTH FGGTM1E91AEW ANLYIIFASPOp1 9pNR'I BDE9IVDAGEBy MON TEESMF03M TDHEAVYELEePLEIIrSWILLE Mp7D'T11W1 GE ITEE ORAIIrE AS ELrnIE BED WM16PIDE BYHWD LYRE GGNSNNAIFQRODIBAIl TINTgm1BALL 00E9 blSMR F OF.OENOXTO �roBMOMTX RAMMO SOt OESMATEDABOYE. RAGEPWTBALL p1wAETD1EE0 r ..: 14A1nE1GIDLE. 1N]x90sDED SOBGRAE MpREACTED BPL EAMBU& PYP I D w E PRO' TREE PLANKING DETAIL �� BULB PLANKING DETAIL _ 5 PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL oA] I -- 1 LZ A-A,1 r1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BURDING 4010 6Sdi STREET W. EIXN& MN MHanhowse4l , MpAlc ArdileeNNEI , N' rNNw �Bi� BFI I[ P IFLP n v61 U�Ar�1 WRpl 10 1M1�® R.MI Mu RMA DOM ml 19SN ML �eEmv osIEwOO° Arn ®M eaa s Wv1 Fa WL ®b ev0100mo°1� K YIC® M� IAN®m AEIma eW vaa 4b! ALlp]AMA p ®eA ]YY�AW Is ® ®e PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE NOTES & DETAILS C BMTTTAL O, A Aw ERDEMCnRRa IEAM]ESP puOESpEAIER nwr 1]1Mrmxpnaxs nawua w aRECRYA1rouxGANGASUmrm DMDFACFaFDAnM 1 NIERGROIIA URRE95MalEMMA1L ®90 RNI 11EMrEEODNmM MIgAI gErErl IOl9CASPECF1G1A6FOR ER0.9NN Cpm14 9 ApAnIIENMwL0GnM0f PROP0.SCBPIAIIT WTEleAl3 WYE NEED MF9D ] LIM9CA^E COxmACrM DMLBRrbICpFIF1ELAPTSa MWGTDN PMORro Rom sreTEApvEx6TBD TEESroReuw LAxosGDE ARaa TECr1AMrExalrmMewroAODSnEMaruxr9. 90iRrero e EROTPD IANTOORS. ral49 ,vHEfAIIpIWmSR1r1ERArAIOnER REAQM9NE W5E0 s LNA9VPE WNOUOrORNM1fOnA Li wI011C1TnTlIES FORLOGrgNa UNpERd0U1]I McE9,CASES WM011119, PeE9 NOAIOlE9,VMV ®MOOEA BUMEDSR4FIURE98ERFE r PLANT wrEW]LS rO eE'NSIwLIDRR nAr01N0 onAns ] YCONTRAACTORS NNLO TIE OW M pGM SCNFMAE WOEMSLPPUDroEMARMfCBYDP4M LANDSCAPE CONTR W51M]VEMYp40FPM0E9P1E0Rro Ma MM OAXYNG LMM]T/VEWNIRALrON9W WMMRUL r1EAB0YEi0aYLFD a PUM W]EWAL 9IVLL BE fER1ARE011POMf4iWATW MINp�DBp1ELEILp11ER APRIOPR�AlEroRIE wIOIEn drELUMrIp19 NA ronAMEBwiFWAL WOwM LDDSGPEARpIWOFSAM. M CMaTMIMMAIMAODilONXCWTMIHEOYMM APMMED FGRM B1 MFO MMIN THE MAKING SMPEA TIE WMFALOARILB BLVI�l�r19 N9pM106011 WYBE 11EAl81Fp14M /91X0 EALL V6fILU1MNMRIIM A UMSGPE fD111wmpiSWlMNEpUI W�LIVNOnON9 NOCpIPACIIW e NWZONTA111NDVBfiFI I AIIpDENT IF PRGO5E9 wAlIp.iWVl9 p1 RDWNAr9IFF S T TOFTHDADA19r1EMREO MNI TOLD r&-DroPOpNROC B INDRAPECWTGCTW BHNLMNV9EMIWFTL EIWONIA1rR0. YEMBF9 A9 1¢gA1ED io M]UE OM1 EA090N 191EPI lOMABSAUTE wMwK AG0N OF 1102 PFA]S WMW TREE NDB02.P616MED WlrN AIDAOpnpWAPR1GTAA0i 100100E Ep ]OwPDT1011GMnE 1BEEBADCFR A �ro��� ign 91E IFDE9PIAECOIDIIQA 9MLLEBRgRiO ro DE ArIEHmaaINEIIlDBpVE CDIDIRpb AND t01eNDIE 11EE 1®.NVAL Arm vwpxG CWVREEMWWMNTAAD 1 MiWgE1FIPOnNCI1X1 VElOMOPoB UrpIpLSIq ND NW MAEBIINR FDes1®GBIDNO AIm9IE01 M00Bro�0nMN00E WpIX rt51wLBE 1xE WA9WEGr1NOVCiOR] CMAESN DEMMLMMWTHEUHRV PEARp91ECr M110Rro01METAEMATDN. 19 COAREIE. 9 RANMAAIE/L9 ECEAANp ORpAD WVER PFREM ]Al &AMAN190NNNE99M] E IBdUry ro N51AEMIDPFN 6116FOE IJD 9IBSAPKE pUMAGEwRANM10 IET�P. 10 W WNOmONS WARM waxrEGlWarAFFECT M .wrEmralsNeEM. sBwvAL On wansexl* 1 NNIMCIONSW0L WN9RRDT pMNAE BMIA9NNEEOED. A WIIGEPMmMAMSOl ml9srM0pFq IAAR l0P5pLA]PMAtC9 spvENm caMPDST AND 1oPAMSSUmwAS OrHE]+WISE aEaFm UNOESMAD6 SITE CONDITIONS SNALL E BRWLIR TO THE ATFENT"O<11E LANDSCAPE a PEIDIEI KTFEMEMIDROPIFd91RUCIDN EMRWAISSWI MM9rNLET=M ID RJN,EmnPNGwro]a 9NAll BE iWOW/LEDRASTFSXEEIMOAPRmiRpI TMMII TURF NOTES MpPTECr PRIOR IOEOMNMOOFNOIIIL CONS —TNN IEF13110NNOOi 6PECIPGTTONw TOR AOpEGIEBMEAND6Lf FENCE. MAREroR18r MUXCN WRAP 9MOOIHI6FAIED 0.YNUpD REFS RArFIFDMiHEF111 11 WDSAPEWTRBACTWLISI ✓�p1SMErDNONGOMGIMMEHMCEOFNE VM T&LED 10 COMNLTM SIOIl MSfal GiMBA9NETD9DNCONTpp .YU5URE9PEA LIPfA PRDIIro OECFMBERIANO RExpVE WPMPINGAPI91 WY1. I S00 APFA9 p9TIRDFOpEroGADRD UMESSNmEOOTIEMRSE WTE1BD811N14 rO,Ea SIDMANNL CMAE110X tEPMGALISOF VANOVISY OR LOGwESOIAMILLOIR IfAMN0. A0ENCLj SPE6 It yN•rHApt51FFi FDGERroBE O3®IDCOMM SHEDAIV.PEIENMNBDD AIIAMB i MFAE SID AB019 PAVED SIARILES OALNE Mepl wYOCOMPRNMropg9rANMl RMAEIIM 6W11E1NE II NIrHM SEVEN GY80FfeISED SREGRAIDM 'p511]DFD AIEA9 SXN1E6rABRIIFD Wrtx W1eDF IRILNnnG ®I¢F195000 eee OnERwIE NOTED. ,RDSImpVDER50p5EFDSNaIEHELD TBEtoW6WALE ELEVAiIOH OF 1NwL BOB. pBR. ErG. IESPON9WI/iYOP IIIEINOSCiIPE CpRRACipi $ID.SDO.WMpI40ptBASE 11 ILEIIILL ANO MWEIM/114AMMOED910 EiENE TOEE PBHE90®IWpAOODYLLp1 ] 9005WL1 BELAO PMNLLfl ronEC pn011n94D SNNL wvE SIAGGEIm EYM9. ON 1] EID9Te10 rIEE9MSIWFIGM 6MRDwS91E'S rO1MOM 91F9WLLE PTIDIECTm A1D "No— p 51.044E S1EEPgI nvAAelpiMpUWAE bWMESIAOSIWIE SAI ®5EC1 ]ELY AMUNL SWME UARGOMwE roEGRADED pESTDN9 EBAIQfINGEA] rMGRNn WlE1DAL 5NNLE BApAFiro11E AT1EMnONOF 11 G ENDNAL6 Apap TEDS&TMFImMTOFSAr EBLESMDEA£S9&DDEMMMLW CATCN D swDD ®WSSING9ro EfEMErpEd 91 ®0 ®1MID1lDODHUCHwm1]gMHpDED A IMES9fA0IEDOTI6RN8E MEAPM16NPrEGTE9FM SPRNp5Eme5W Rl1tf1FM 111ELANGSpWEARpeIECi FMAI roN@U'N BIEM9.iMIlE pIMTAIfF I]MfMICfDIr. P0.YFElER wEEOBAAAER vMIW T1E 10.Ep101YDMV nuwEO roAME 19 1] EASTMOlIEE9 roRETWR1FOl0eECTIMRUU1GSnAE ARBHeTEm.SHaLEFENT4T� '1 LVDAAPE LQRRICFp15H0] LRpIpAESDSIMNRRQI E/SOIE9AFTENVEOE1AlRNrs H CpMERpr9REE9DE rogFCSVEfpEf P9E®GE04wIDP100DYUlp1ND pW1 WVE lAlE�i1 FALLESMOPL 5 FNLSWGMOrsAL�r19715 SEPTEMBER ANOMRrteroroExrnE OUnWIEEL UMAIfi3HANp MDBeDBRALEIE9 IsrAEUSmAID1]SPPaE OF OM STE. NOwyM MBREOr1EMAt1 rA1H THE NEE Twpp 13 At�rAAEFRW A0l]AI 15 TO SF➢TBSEA 19. AWRIYBFr9 ro50015EEDPIAMRD TO n NMnEMWfF FrMM BPERE UOSrwTED. 10 MW EOEM AND YECw A91IQ•rAl® M GTB w19T EAA91D9m NWRI]DMnE V]DST/iPE AM]eRCr OM1AWPA6 W MSPECPNAllp9 LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION NOTES PTEPAIE BOIlFp1 NC1E iNE EIiDREBEO SEE SPEpRCARM ECTIM RFlA1FD roEATERMIPIANTMO ' TSILLM T NR ""Em , 9 — 'CONTACT Yrt1F S BIEN g 1r WHO BNO]91 FAEDO ) NOR Lvl SEEPWI ®GMCOI]111MVAME9.sB PLAN O WxTIU1GIpISwILEESPOxSIBLE EOVD. SEERM �--� 10R N4ANIM✓PAOIEE$MAPIUIM CAEAMfliOROMTwTFNI16NE1 „�-`r P05TIIMlIM011p101/i THE WWRANIY WYE 80018 MVDLOOSE4® i TCmPILCI® P9000. NIIAP IEEIMW60xlYV40N PUNTMO SIMFM BKOMS m p10MDLNLLC41. A14TDVHBYLAIDSI'AIEARIIIECT Nb fE6E111HW rDm GII �L roBEIU[FDDGY9 6EESKOFrARM SKNON RISAlEO JUN J ® IruMrsloESAroemrw6 ArIFAIiEE RANTRD roED1E1WNPVNINO - NgNplrimGBON EMIEEDWIINSPADE Br41AN0 BOO MNO MACH TOE EACH FREE SIML ERA FEDSUM � roerDWTIHRNE9DEFA LEVawnrl FrASHm m]nE. _ TERGY'R,'EnWSDLSAT J BHRUB PLANTING DETAIL LavSTUDm SUBGRADE , OONm MACE NRMM RIE lOP 0F1HEROm BALL rTrE r WIFTACTYIIIH 1REE rRUNI ROm FWESMm Yrs1EE THE SOI Arw]r •• - swuEtELavroMALE4L4wrwEn ��•.S 'L _ mTRD RMTm rRw nE ROOi BALL io WIERE TIE =� E '} IF rolMllaff LABS NNNOROEILROm�{'pA ON 4 I1YR9QIIEtKE9 8101 TIE rmAA4 ®,� ErNAW pDETI ROmI ME11M1 AI6S SI]?RAN MM5r1 GADE WxOt LOVER TD• EPERroPLwDHG C04mACr wAIRPIG OFRWrBN1rAT11 SOL RNANOp PI/Nr S paElEIIYUMIM0MMI10p131 Wlpell, ®I191G _ NOTE SOLMOPERCENT �p L,NE RMU5 EQ��roTSAW 1QlME® SEESPEC CTNM ESE P�IaO f sMFrPEx — POSTSA roA9rN 0eN MRIAf fORfO GY9 17 R/Ir11aO11p1E5 it FN9 ®fAAOE. rWLa 00X01 MACE NAM pIrEH]109T i---- iIDS, WIMsPAL�E B51'WVN EIOro FmE95� .. -flµ _ L�EW4 CON0TNM VNE9. SEE TUN _ r BRA4CIE9,IEFFR i0 RAx - -' �DRLOUTDre n4ES WNDMIII PIEPAIED SO4 moxc. aEPWA —.�— - 'nMrD0E0NA10WOW F. 1 PUMIIDMroE rvD OFBUU CMTNNOIGRBTM wTartE SHALL NAM gEAAAE VEGETAIDN. UNDI5T111DE050BpuE M FWE Pws TIE VwflER MWROOTSGNO LOOSENED P915PEC..86VE M91ALLM0 DMRPjgmmfror— - OFROOTG— SLOPED , TOPLANTMNOFE FR - ".E1FlARON NAM MAN IUMMB SOLiMPHEMMOF OEEiFRiNAN qOm BAU lILP9p4 MOL- R00TBNLGSE roPW1TR10 N0TE5 Ig1F 11EE MMIEC'RpI SIMLEPRONGED BYCONTRACTORIU IEWI®roENSNE SIMVNAHIIry tF IEWVEMIMIIP, rTME. RO4E AID FRELTIWTH FGGTM1E91AEW ANLYIIFASPOp1 9pNR'I BDE9IVDAGEBy MON TEESMF03M TDHEAVYELEePLEIIrSWILLE Mp7D'T11W1 GE ITEE ORAIIrE AS ELrnIE BED WM16PIDE BYHWD LYRE GGNSNNAIFQRODIBAIl TINTgm1BALL 00E9 blSMR F OF.OENOXTO �roBMOMTX RAMMO SOt OESMATEDABOYE. RAGEPWTBALL p1wAETD1EE0 r ..: 14A1nE1GIDLE. 1N]x90sDED SOBGRAE MpREACTED BPL EAMBU& PYP I D w E PRO' TREE PLANKING DETAIL �� BULB PLANKING DETAIL _ 5 PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL oA] I -- 1 LZ A-A,1 r1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BURDING 4010 6Sdi STREET W. EIXN& MN MHanhowse4l , MpAlc ArdileeNNEI , N' rNNw �Bi� BFI I[ P IFLP n v61 U�Ar�1 WRpl 10 1M1�® R.MI Mu RMA DOM ml 19SN ML �eEmv osIEwOO° Arn ®M eaa s Wv1 Fa WL ®b ev0100mo°1� K YIC® M� IAN®m AEIma eW vaa 4b! ALlp]AMA p ®eA ]YY�AW Is ® ®e PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE NOTES & DETAILS C BMTTTAL O, 1 I 7I 1 VARES SEE HAP FALEaeuemro ]1R �Y OAE95EP iPAP POC% AW�Ero� AEiAt ElOEP W/9iA1� FaaSIEO AMOEDGE TWAFL v C9NdrWPVAIlE9� aEE NAN vmmfOP1ma I:AFIE CAPwi rorOP aMIW M HALL Fl£/AnQ6 FM WIIDIOOP alMxwi, 1'OVFJOIAep sFLn oFF eAOCtME ROOT wEEOxwiEP FANPC FMI90E Tm.MUP wi IrAraAeaE MAUE.MIo roFn,NNOIWIMIi34MG irt, aME TOOPUx AuwonTS NALLPWU6.�roHAP RAMATNTRM FMxAUUrM 7 MAINTENANCE STRIP - MINERAL MULCH VHL4AL A,v"Tafoot AImCAP Lears,SUnar WEM L7 �" � "` •• arms! TOlNUSV womEa vMAH+Pwk H!M lolmaPa � q §Tj MrSM"FOPHAPmc FS:FSEP roAAxFMHAPPPC ( ca .mL mMAx WAnuP.aME roMAH Aw:AVmwxxl °xi WAYH WAIL Y ro®IPHiwlnla warnw G xlLL1EFEP 'M M roNAPI \ iE9 III- oPAeIAOEAfifiEfA,EP ,SpO(ND,P WMNN ACTED .5E CMNACTFD M VNd6111P8E0 6OaMIDE b I 0 AWRECATE USE TfS — I I rmc rowan en LUMP MO E2alY WrmAmnP 3 SEGMENTAL WALL SECTION - FREESTANDING �� �� Pms 5 MA Y WATE MES TO K F10G TR NOTES,. NCPOAYFMOBEEPAY9P rolIaI OE2NCIMVE0E1A�MWnALBE COIPOSFD M� SmWMLMIATTPEPAM7x1EPFACEM Wgmx11TE TPFEI�OGPMWUE Nfm IEWIElEM9TNESE iO1E9 A1E PEpAI(FD AIPWFPONEiEP9. FEIAIF➢GEP131PAmi'PUSm AI�VF�2MFl oamu1MBIEncmww nM. OROWWOAEW 111/x911014 WAFt DkMA MT1EFMMLAWGAK rESLETWOrPOUEmA WM TRAM Ex1EPa Arm=URE�P !710 mmAU 1ETABIEp�Al �.PO]mFA Cp@ACWN WP3dL SiMUGE Ero PEOAm 6MPOPr /AYEP W41B4 MIM�'lW1A -T/B filAOE mEA4M0CMe11T1M9 pmEgfAllY91fA1BYWAUSN1IAE e1C le]elsarze A 9D TIEEaPACE COO1mMAWuAa OE141LfYlOPACTM iM onW TYPEe1PAmwsaA14N1111E. w ECWOFlM CaMPxB �� EcuncaaeTAOFaASFw m xAUlun BTAIeMNI PAlEr1E wn8T C OMNEP ROM BALAm.PE11W1A — Ei AT 12VGMFM pM RECALLATAI2EAWM FILLOLOCAOM 10 .I ly TQ I MUINnE9 Al LEAm ■ImIAd flUM OGGPO IYi 1 I fNEBOEaM 11EH1J1PP0 N01E96PUAO BE ALHiI VEOflAlE0FWf1PAY1L551BAgY, Pfl10''m0 lmALLHPluuasrCMA .FMM. Pm1m®wrBrxASllwe. wBaMro i Ii W..A E'NIS® FPE �AOE sFE HAPFMVEMTAPVE NR NEWT TFEBN1pLLOBEH A1MSUMRV r` Fuel FA90C.F61m1A - C MMMO -ro M BANIYBIT EDGE P1W . I EE �n� ��rL_�e� MAxABEwi,lmmlm \ AREABF POPOMMOatl005E 6PC MOTIE N0.EAIA1PE mEE H.w, 9Y91EL1, `— MMIPFE AI WATT MM SPADE lIAOE APONATEP OIOPWPICY i g 800.11A'POOFNNP eFUanBE 1EIENf10P Pmmtm \ '`!�� \ `IM9IUPBFD aET FLM POpTlypp61YF1®NJIEPEA m1A. V SIIBGPJOE rEFEProovE SxEErsFM FxrExleM a'PUC"Aw sua MMOC1nMBPEAgVI19 4 VEGETATION FREE ZONE 0 VEGETATED ROOF PERIMETER 2 TREE RELOCATION DETAIL L3 J . ...._.......� --m. 1rrinkl nr-TAII C a R E I" % RAW 1 REOONAL SII E PLAN EARIVM PARIUIG GARAGE O POHf fiNEti av v4R114 • P In DATA zoNNC C ASWIC AMM mnwc Im-1 naosn I!U MI�MG SEt RA06 p' a aN➢nF NaWf, woflea R afArtn (vnwa.S n[aa®1 5a A' an Roan IN4n, rn1aRSO1 R aGhn ("4.wKi RPNa� tin ]a' all a.an Id a, wnnm 5 O.Aea (+uvxct maN.vl PARRMC SET RACKS inMl a RNaIE 1R14Nf. .lSa1CAa rs aNana (xaw[[ P[aaeal SR la' all RNaC Klan, wa %t[Il 6 tlFA1FM (�NeKY aaNnol damn lmrt, Innoua 6 aunty NNmxr uannral PARRMG R[QIIRt(MFNIS — _ _ nxeme Mm lmf an¢ 13ao sus nn9aws ar / >W - in r re - m srus waa® Isaac miac roolNZ nmluvrrs � uwa a nmsm mNSI u nn uYlr aao.lo snus. ra vrn.c anwm� ]6 Salt aQN® 11l nD Nlal a IMIaC IkaNSS E) 51NISN15 SITE AREA CALCUTAMNS ■M aQ1912 IIU[ war aNaa roan ao ro a,nNx< naa NRA lam KMI In teal eNRSt N.a rmN nw r Mamet mm ran n no nl raars.a >snla . IN�t �� m,. n �r g I�aw[t au,l soar . l l mrl aNas �n Nu.�taa,n aNaNa aaNa m.nlo mnn,�w m- m ,.�am,troa Ma -reams ..,agars sum sm.a+ a- srt lnmr Nu/mc Nu -reams cea®ra nsl vnn,al m- as crN aNaw Nn/aR wa -noon Nu wno EDINA CROSSIOWN MEDICAL II.0 im 65th W. W. MILAN Ha Mnen Nanxn ArtilR.cNrel o.am aias � niN wn .s nvam n a. , awa s.0 s aam aN N.os b am.lg m_I RMaI w.r..nuc I� arw selm REGIONAL SITE PLAN JBMITTAL A1.0 I 1 I I 1 I T ' I 1 IV b PO 42 I I 1 I 1 I I O OI 5 I I I Ip I YTbPaom _ O-OI � � I Q LOWER LEVEL PLAN 4 I I 1 I I W n SECOND FLOOR PLAN I 1 ' I . I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 7144- NI-' W I I I 1 _ ea oEm T� as maul I I I 1 necnn 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 EDINA CROSSTOWN I I I II MEDICAL LLC I II I I I 4 I I 1 I I W n SECOND FLOOR PLAN I 1 ' I . I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 7144- NI-' W I I I 1 _ ea oEm T� as maul I I I 1 necnn 1 I I 1 I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC I I EDINA CROSSTOWN - - - MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th STREET W. - 4 i p EDINA, MINNESOTA Mohan - _ Herman Add Worn ' 4 h m, ew I 1 om'e1°Ormi avow ie evem n 1 I d rm�mv ®e � ]e508 ennm �mrwnc�� e a ooesiu .r an uma uma erme rn 7 RED JUN 3 0 2000 � tea. SECOND FLOOR PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL A .2 T W ,fd 1 IId I II< ' A — — -- i � I I n P4 n STALLS _ -;v.8519 SF �— _ F V 99 r�d.rx cv. n TH FOUR FLOOR PLAN ' �. Diu• . � -o i �— FoUITH ILR _ 1 S90 iSF � _i 1 - —ri T i F 1 4 IId � e -0• F i h II � 4 nPENTHOUSE 6,705 GSF _ EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th STREET W. EDINA, MINNESOTA MH.. Ha.oen vm� v im^^oao ario+�m. s MIIYnMO LL M.� Ram N1�llP FOURTH FLOOR PLAN CITY SUBMITTAL. A2.4 I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 I e_y R. wnems alnv EDINA CROSSTOWN 1 I MEDICAL LLC I ' EDINA CROSSTOWN LEVEL PS — — — MEDICAL BUILDING 4010 65th - — GARAGE & ROOF LEVEL � I 1 I I I 1 I I I I 1 I I I I I 1 I 5 • PARKING GARAGE & ROOF LEVEL V P- - Ea ® ID�eA AaIeN( rmRed �tia Uo Am+en +tv0 a, 6 S A _ _ 4 b q 4 d l eeO: V MINNESOTA Awm Lw�e ml K R u e° Iu I` IRv NRl R Oe JNI® eOW E m : V EeMlro CC O��We 1IIw¢1IR TR6M1+ STREW1I R Ss R� aY6 nO Re u . m R P I swNPl s mla emlm eRa am mnem v x owo enrolls la e�ila ee[ anseen� .sR rmeewr .eR wne mme sRR 1 ,�� R. wnems alnv Y .eye uu JUN 3 0 ma F� LEVEL PS /. ^I PARKING GARAGE & ROOF LEVEL CITY SUBMITTAL A� A2.5 �� �� -- - � ku ens r-�7 rr ■. �. ■ -,. R'y ii•i - s { ■ ■per ■■ F � � ■IM° ■ I■■a ■ u■� ■- ■i ■■ii■ .■�.. aim iGa,.. ■ 9 � � p,,_�� � � �����m �,: ; ■II��x � ©���t� ;� ■ :� ■ u� ■ f �, s � . � k[["'�- l i "`� � x ' 11 3L0d� � - -_ .-- l� � � P � _ ' •"jI. �k ��b t ��a i� . F�■ e:��_e:• i._�r_x... — I_� t,. � "c �f.�.�, -• - ■ -��■ , + -,�6 �srP�E,- .i`�L.���� �i4��1� ,i����� ` ■p4 � 3rd �_. �� _ �� ■ ��� - — K -t . i i 1 I s .I M �rapxnr mmrva[ i.u' -0' . o�astpx / s¢r sfM � ramn am � rams �cnrx eutwc aav sam REGIONAL SITE SECTION - NORTH /SOUTH REGIONAL SITE SECTION - WEST/EAST mmmw na:r mamas em rranwm eiaunas rums mmwu i.w._u.1 maw mmvat m' -o' Grading plan ed April 28, 2008, Landscaping plafdated April 28, 2008 • Building elevations ated April 28, 2008 • Final Landscape Pla or staff approval • Record the resolution ith the county • The property owner is r ponsible for repl landscaping that dies. • Submit a copy of the nine lie Creek wat City may require revisions t the appro , ec ng any required ;hed district permit. The plans to meet the district's requirements. • All storm water for this site m t be eated on -site. • Compliance with the condition a ired by the City Engineer in his memo dated May 22, 2008. • Compliance with the conditions uired by the Transportation Commission. • A developer's agreement is re • ire for public water main installation along West 69th S eet an Xerxes Avenue, and for the sanitary sewer along West 6 h Street, and subject to the following adional conditIns: • Clarify and bring sam s of exterior bull residential and retail uildings; • Ensure that the gr n roof area above gara • Establish clarity at at minimum 50% of th active; and • Revised land aping plan to meet Code as requiremen ng materials for both be at least 25% ork Avenue fagade be over -story tree Commissioner Brown seconded the motion. Ayes; Scherer, Staunton, Fischer, Brown. Nay Risser, Schroeder and Grabiel. Abstain, Lonsbury. Motion carried. P -08 -6 Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning Crosstown Medical LLC 4010 65th Street West, Edina Staff Presentation Planner Teague presented his staff report noting the applicant is proposing to tear down the existing two -story, 26,000 square foot office building and construct a new 73,386 square foot, four -story medical office building with six -level M 4 supporting parking ramp. Planner Teague said the proposal requires a preliminary development plan, preliminary rezoning and variances from the RMD standards. The requested rezoning is from POD -1, Planned Office District to RMD, Regional Medical District and the rezoning also includes the adjacent Fairview Hospital parking ramp which is currently zoned APD, Automobile Parking District. Planner Teague concluded staff recommends denial of the Preliminary Development Plan, Rezoning from POD to RMD and the following variances at 4010 65th Street West for Crosstown Medical LLC: 1. Front building setback variance from 74 feet to 52 feet. (A 22 -foot variance.) 2. Rear building setback variance from 74 feet to 20 feet. (A 54 -foot variance.) 3. Side building setback variance from 74 feet to 21 feet. (A 53 -foot variance.) 4. Front parking structure setback variance from 80 feet to 18 feet. (A 62 -foot variance.) 5. Rear parking structure setback variance from 80 feet to 20 feet. (A 60 -foot variance.) 6. Side parking structure setback variance from 70 feet to 10 feet. (A 60 -foot variance.) 7. Side yard drive -aisle setback variance from 10 feet to 3.3 feet. (A 6.7 -foot variance.) denial is also based on the following findings: 1. The applicant is requesting a rezoning to the Regional Medical District, to increase the allowed density on the site. However, the proposed plans would not come close to meeting the minimum zoning ordinance standards of the RMD District; seven variances are requested; and large variances are requested to all four lot lines. 2. There is no hardship to justify the large variances. The variances are self created. If the variances were denied, the applicant would not be denied reasonable use of their property. There is an existing office on the site which could continue to be used, or the offices could be town down, and the site redeveloped with similar uses to meet city code. The site currently is slightly under utilized as the existing floor area ratio (FAR) is 30 %. Within the existing Planned Office District, which this property is located, the maximum FAR is 50 %. Commissioner Brown addressed the Chair and Commission and explained he has a professional conflict with the proposed project and will abstain from the vote. M 5 Appearing for the Applicant/Proiect Mr. Alan Hill, BKO Development, Dr. David Holte, Twin Cities Orthopedics, Mark Hansen, Mohagen and Hansen Architectural Group and Larry Hegenes, property owner. Applicant Presentation Mr. Hill told the Commission he believes the proposed development concept is good, it re- invests in the community and the proposed use for the site is appropriate, adding the site will be redeveloped with high level design quality. Mr. Hill explained as they evaluated the project it became clear that a request to rezone the site to a regional medical district made the most sense, pointing out the proportions of the site is not ideal. Mr. Hill said he was encouraged by the traffic report adding the close proximity to mass transit and the incorporation of places to park bicycles will aid in reducing vehicle trips. Concluding, Mr. Hill, said the proposed medical use of the new building would serve the needs of the community pointing out the change in demographics as Edina ages. Mr. Hill introduced Dr. Holte of Twin Cities Orthopedics. Dr. Holte addressed the Commission and explained Twin Cities Ortho has three offices within 6 blocks of Fairview Southdale Hospital (FSH). Dr. Holte said the proposed medical office building will office those physicians scattered in three area buildings and will also contain a surgery center. Dr. Holte explained 75% of the orthopedics cases at FSH are serviced by Twin Cities Ortho. Continuing, Dr. Holte said the proposed building will be a one owner building that will be tastefully designed and constructed. Concluding, Dr. Holte said it is very important to Twin Cities Ortho to have good access to FSH. Mr. Hill introduced Mr. Mark Hansen. Mr. Hansen gave a power point presentation highlighting features of the project. Mr. Hansen reported they are using a sustainable approach to storm water management and irrigation designs working toward satisfying LEED related standards. Mr. Hansen said exterior materials were chosen to combine materials, color, massing to weave together the medical office building and supporting parking structure. Building materials will include multiple colors of brick, stone or architectural case stone accent bands, architectural metal, glass and aluminum curtain wall systems. It is proposed that the supporting parking ramp will use complementary precast concrete components with openings and details that relate to the medical office building. n. Commission Comments /Questions Commissioner Staunton questioned the reasoning behind the square footage and square shape of the proposed building. Mr. Hill explained that a square building is needed to accommodate the surgery room. Continuing, Mr. Hill explained the square footage is needed to house the doctors that presently office out of three different locations in the immediate area. Commissioner Risser questioned if the development team looked into parking somewhere else. Mr. Hill explained the close proximity to the FSH ramp made that an option; however, when FSH was approached they expressed concern with their potential for growth and how that would be impacted if parking spaces in their ramp were leased to Twin Cities Ortho. Mr. Hill added the owner of bank building to the west of the subject site was approached for purchase; however he declined. Commissioner Schroeder said he does have some concern with how the water garden could work. Mr. Oliver responded that at this time they are in the preliminary stages of development and by the time of final approval more detail would be available. Chair Lonsbury asked if the public would like to comment on the project. Public Comment. No public comment. Commissioner Grabiel moved to close the public testimony. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. Commission Comments Chair Lonsbury noted for the record that the Commission received four letters regarding this proposal. Two favorable; and two against. A discussion ensued with the majority of the Commission expressing their support for the project as proposed. Commissioners acknowledged the proposed office building with supporting ramp is large, and multiple variances are required for redevelopment; however, the proposed rezoning makes sense as an extension of an already existing medical campus; albeit by a different property owner and the location of the site directly abutting Crosstown Highway minimizes impact. Continuing, Commissioners expressed some regret that this site wasn't identified earlier for redevelopment and growth, noting to under develop the site could also be a mistake. Continuing, Commissioners expressed positive feelings for the development as a whole noting the building is tastefully designed. Act;( 7 The discussion continued and focused on the rezoning of the site, questioning if this would be spot zoning, questioning the size of the building and supporting ramp, and the appropriateness of rezoning the existing FSH ramp. Commissioners also questioned if more parking could be added below grade reducing the scale of the supporting ramp. Commissioners were informed that due to the high water table in this area putting the parking below grade would be difficult. In conclusion Commissioners reiterated that rezoning this site is a continuation of the medical office corridor zoning and should be viewed positively. Commissioners also acknowledged the mass and scale of the project; however, the location abutting the highway minimizes the impact. Commissioners did indicate they would prefer that the existing FSH ramp is not rezoned. Chair Lonsbury and Commissioner Staunton expressed their opinion that the project is beautifully designed; however, the density of the site more than doubles with this project, adding this request does "spot zone" this site. Chair Lonsbury said when Cornelia Place was developed he struggled with its mass, adding he still believes it is overbuilt, adding the mass, size and density of this project exceeds that of Cornelia Place. Commissioner Staunton agreed with comments from Chair Lonsbury adding the proposed change in zoning, along with the increase in density is something that needs to be carefully considered, adding with great reluctance he can't support the proposal, it is too much, pointing out that in the past the Commission was mindful of increasing the density in the greater Southdale area. After further discussion Commissioners were of the opinion that the existing FSH parking ramp should not be rezoned, and that one level of parking on the parking ramp should be removed and a proof of parking agreement implemented. Commissioner Grabiel moved to recommend that the City Council approve the preliminary development plan and preliminary rezoning for the proposed Crosstown Medical building based on the following findings: 1. The rezoning would be an extension of the RMD district to the East. 2. The rezoning would be consistent with the City's guide plan. 3. Increase in density could be supported by existing roadways, as determined in the traffic study done by Wenck and Associates. 4. The rezoning would be consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Approval is also subject to the following Conditions: q93 0 1. Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plan date stamped April 28 & May 21, 2008. 2. Final rezoning would not include the existing parking ramp for Fairview Hospital. 3. The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative within the staff report. 4. Trail and sidewalk connections must be included as demonstrated on the preliminary plans. Public easements must be established over all public sidewalks. 5. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the Fire Marshal. 6. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the City Engineer's memo. 7. Compliance with all the conditions required by the . Transportation Commission. 8. The Landscape Plan should be improved to add trees around the perimeter of the site, especially along the west and north lot line; and 9. The top level of the parking ramp must be eliminated; and the applicant must enter into a proof of parking agreement. If parking becomes a problem, as determined by staff, the top level of the parking ramp must be constructed. Approval also includes recommending that the Zoning Board of Appeals and the City Council approve the following variances: 1. -Front building setback variance from 74 feet to 52 feet. (A 22 -foot variance.) 2. Rear building setback variance from 74 feet to 20 feet. (A 54 -foot variance.) 3. Side building setback variance from 74 feet to 21 feet. (A 53 -foot variance.) 4. Front parking structure setback variance from 80 feet to 18 feet. (A 62 -foot variance.) 5. Rear parking structure setback variance from 80 feet to 20 feet. (A 60 -foot variance.) 6. Side parking structure setback variance from 70 feet to 10 feet. (A 60- foot variance.) 7. Side yard drive -aisle setback variance from 10 feet to 3.3 feet. (A 6.7- foot variance.) Variance approval is based on the following findings: A4$ 9 1. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the shape and limited depth of the lot, especially the Western half of the site. 2. The variance would meet the intent of the ordinance because the building is reasonably sized given the allowed FAR in the RMD district is 1.0. The proposed FAR is .83. 3. The height of the ramp and building are generally consistent with buildings and ramps in the area. 4. The site's location adjacent to Crosstown Highway 62. 5. The high water table prevents the parking from being constructed under ground. Commissioner Scherer seconded the motion. Ayes; Risser, Scherer, Schroeder, Fischer, Grabiel. Nays; Lonsbury, Staunton. Abstain; Brown. Motion carried. III. OTHER BUSINESS: Discussion on Tree Ordinance Chair Lonsbury reminded the Commission at the last Commission Meeting discussion was tabled on developing a tree ordinance so Commissioner Schroeder could be present. Chair Lonsbury asked Commissioner Schroeder for his opinion on developing a tree ordinance. Commissioner Schroeder said he reviewed the tree ordinance examples submitted to the Commission from staff; however; in his opinion the City can't move forward on implementing a tree ordinance until the City takes a tree inventory, pointing out there is no base line to start from. Planner Teague said he would be willing to set up a meeting with the City Forrester and Park Director John Keprios to discuss the issue. Chair Lonsbury noted there also will need to be some discussion on public versus private. Planner Teague and Commissioners agreed. IV. INTERGOVERNMENTAL BUSINESS: Chair Lonsbury acknowledged receipt of back of the packet materials. V. ADJOURNMENT AND ADDIITONAL PUBLIC COMMENT: Ms. Jennifer Janovy, 4016 Inglewood Avenue, addressed the Commission and explained she was present this evening to address the construction occurring at Calvin Christian School and how what was built has changed from what was A+ 10 8. A deve er's agreement was required for public water main installaf along West 69t" reet and Xerxes Avenue, and for the sanitary sewer al West 69t Street. 9. Two surface p ing spaces in front of the apartments st be eliminated to meet the require arking space setback from West 6 treet. 10. Bike storage must b rovided to meet City Cod 11. No drive - through win access allowed f e retail buildings. 12. Fifty percent (50 %) of retail use the building that faces York Avenue must have doors that have ublic cess openings to the street. 13. The project will be built ac c ng to the final plans and specifications and with materials as presented e J e 17, 2008 City Council meeting. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, S son, Hovlan Motion carried. Member S�NensonpWffe a motion, seconded by Memb Masica to adopt Resolution No. 2008- 59 approving of division for 3101 and 3201 West 69t" reet, DJR Architects, Tom Miller. Ayes: qpoett, Housh, Masica, Swenson, Hovland Mo ' carried. RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -56 ADOPTED GRANTING PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND PRELIMINARY REZONING APPROVAL 4010 WEST 65 STREET, CROSSTOWN MEDICAL LLC Affidavits of Notice presented and ordered placed on file. Mr. Teague said the applicant was proposing to tear down the existing two -story, 26,000 square foot office building to build a 73,386 square foot, four -story medical office building with a six -level attached parking ramp. In order to proceed with the development, the applicant must go through the preliminary review by the Planning Commission and City Council which if granted would allow the developer to prepare the Final Plans for submission. He reported he had recommended denial of the preliminary review because the project was in need of seven variances. The Planning Commission at their May 28, 2008, meeting recommended the Council consider approval of the requested preliminary development plan and preliminary rezoning with nine conditions. Mr. Teague stated the Planning. Commission also recommended the Zoning Board of Appeals favorably consider the necessary variances for the project. Proponent Presentation Alan Hill, BKO Development introduced the members of the proponent's group: Dr. David Holte, Twin Cities Orthopedics; Mark Hansen, Mohagen and Hansen Architectural Group; Brad Beard, Administrator Fairview Southdale Hospital; and property owner Larry Hegenes. Using a PowerPoint presentation, the proponents reviewed their project and answered questions of the City Council. Items noted included: the elevations of the current and proposed buildings, the green roof, management of storm water on site, possible removal of one -half of a level of parking, traffic, potential for widening of and /or intersection, bridge or ramp improvements relating to the nearby highway, the density /intensity of the proposed development, seven requested variances, whether rezoning precedent would be set if approval were granted, location of project relative to existing hospital, and potential impact on the greater Southdale area. Public Comment No one appeared to comment. Member Masica made a motion that was seconded by Member Housh to close the public hearing. Ayes: Bennett, Housh, Masica, Hovland Motion carried. Page 4 Minutes /Edina City Council /June 17, 2008 Member Housh made a motion, seconded by Member Masica to adopt Resolution No. 2008 -56 granting Preliminary Development Plan and Preliminary Rezoning to 4010 West 651' Street, Crosstown Medical LLC with the following conditions: 1. The Final Development Plan must be generally consistent with approved Preliminary Development Plan date - stamped April 28 & May 21, 2008. 2. Final rezoning would not include the existing parking ramp for Fairview Hospital. 3. The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative within the staff report. 4. Trail and sidewalk connections must be included as demonstrated on the preliminary plans. Public easements must be established over all public sidewalks. 5. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the Fire Marshal. 6. Compliance with all of the conditions outlined in the City Engineer's memo. 7. Compliance with all the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 8. The Landscape Plan should be improved to add trees around the perimeter of the site, especially along the west and north lot line. 9. The top level of the parking ramp must be eliminated, and the applicant must enter into a proof of parking agreement. If parking becomes a problem, as determined by staff, the top level of the parking ramp must be constructed. Ayes: Housh, Masica, Hovland Nays: Bennett, Swenson Motion carried. PUBLIC COMMENT No one appeared. for public comment. AWARD OF BID ENG 08 -5 MORNINGSIDE WATER MAIN PIPE RE- LINING WM -481 Mr. Houle stated the award of bid for the 2008 Morningside water main pipe re- lining project had been continued from the June 3, 2008 to allow the apparent low bidder, Insituform, to provide answers about the proposed product's safety and longevity and to allow an analysis by the City's utility rate consultant of any potential rate increase for the Morningside Neighborhood water system. He said that Ehlers and Associates would need more time to complete their analysis. John Wallin, Finance Director, said he had done a simple calculation of the cost of the proposed improvements over their useful life and had derived an increased rate of between 60 -90 cents per 100 cubic foot unit. However, he said this was not based on all the factors that would need to be reviewed in a true rate study. After a brief discussion, Mr. Hughes pointed out that the utility rate consultant would need time to provide a complete report determining if there was parity in the rate structures of the Morningside neighborhood and the rest of Edina. Mr. Houle introduced Mr. David Rosenberg from Insituform Technologies USA, Inc. and Mr. Dave Purkiss from the National Sanitation Foundation to talk about the proposed product. Mr. Rosenberg read a statement talking about Insituform's product and answered questions of the Council regarding the safety and longevity of the proposal structural relining. Mr. Purkiss explained he managed the certification program for water distribution products for National Sanitation Foundation, International or NSF. Mr. Purkiss said he would be speaking about only the health effects of the product and not its durability. He stated the pipe proposed to be used in the relining project complied with the health effects requirements of NSF /ANSI Standard 61 for materials designed for contact with potable water. The Council asked questions of staff, Mr. Rosenberg and Mr. Purkiss including: the number of communities using the pipe proposed for the project in Edina, whether any complaints had been received, the proposed longevity of the pipe, whether any public health concerns had been raised in communities using the product, and how NSF developed Standard 61. Items of concern noted during the discussion included: the receipt of a petition from residents of the Morningside neighborhood requesting a public hearing on the project, disappointment over difficulty in obtaining sufficient information regarding the product proposed to be used in the re- lining, the urgency of the project, and cost of delaying the project. AO Page 5 A. o MEMORANDUM — Plan Review �J ay ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA DATE: May 22, 2008 TO: Cary Teague - City Planner FROM: Wayne Houle.- Director of Public Works/ City Engineer SUBJECT: Proposed Crosstown Medical Building 4010 West 65th Street Engineering has reviewed plans for the above stated project and offer the following comments: • The Edina Transportation Commission (ETC) has accepted the Traffic Impact Study, see attached Traffic Impact Study and draft minutes from the May 15, 2008 ETC meeting. • A Minnehaha Creek Watershed permit with a courtesy review by Ninemile Creek Watershed will be required. • An executed pond expansion agreement will be needed for this project. Sheet — C2 Removals Plan: 1. Show storm sewer connection, if this exists, for storm sewer catch basins in middle of property. 2. Remove westerly sanitary sewer service wye at main. Sheet — C3 Preliminary Site Plan: 1. Show dimensions of radii at driveways. Sheet — C5 Preliminary Utility Plan: 1. Please respond with what will be done with the storm water that is stored on site. Will this be able to percolate and at what rate. 2. Replace easterly sanitary sewer service all the way to main or reline with CIPP liner. This is the first review of these plans. Staff will require a more detail review of the Civil Plans if this project is approved by the City Council. Please contact me if you have any questions regarding this first review. Thanks 071 GAEngineering \General \60.69 Streets\4010 West 65th Street\20080522 review of Crosstown Medical Building.doc wq�,j�r w y MEMORANDUM — Plan Review °•N ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDINA DATE: July 24, 2008 TO: Cary Teague - City Planner FROM: Wayne Houle - Director of Public Works / City Engineer SUBJECT: Proposed Crosstown Medical Building 4010 West 65th Street My review memo of May 22, 2008 (see attached) still stands since most of these items have not been taken care of. 44A GAEngineering \General \60 - 69 Streets\4010 West 65th Street\20080724 review of Crosstown Medical Building.doc Page 1 of 2 Edina Transportation Commission Item IV. b. rrREGULAR TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION MEETING 1 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Transportation Commissioners Agenda Item No.: N. b. From: Jack Sullivan, PE ��j ACTION: Assistant City Engine , ® Recommendation /Motion Date: May 15, 2008 ® Discussion Subject: Transportation ❑ Information Impact Analysis — 4010 W 65th St. — Crosstown Medical Office Recommendation: Review the attached transportation impact analysis submitted by Wenck dated April 23, 2008 and review a memo dated May 7th, 2008 from WSB and Associates. Currently staff and our traffic consultant WSB feel that this transportation submittal is not yet complete. Staff, WSB and Wenck are working to resolve the outstanding items listed in the attached memo prior to the Edina Transportation Commission meeting on May 15, 2008. Currently the conditions of the approval are: 1. This development shall address all comments in WSB's May 7, 2008 memo to the satisfaction of the ETC and Engineering Department. 2. To participate in appropriate cost sharing for signal improvements at 65th Street and France Avenue. Therefore staff is withholding a recommendation on this project pending the resolution of the outstanding issues. Info /Background: Staff received a proposal for a 76,966 sq ft medical office facility and parking structure on the site of the existing two story office building located on the north side of 65th Street just west of the Fairview parking ramp. nn ti T V G\Engineenng\lnfrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Transportation Commission\Agendas\2008 R&R\ 20080515_ 4010W65th _Medical_Office_Traffic_Study.doc Page 2 of 2 Item IV. b. Edina Transportation Commission The traffic study covers three development scenarios ranging from the proposed building footprint and parking ramp up to incorporating the existing bank at 4018 W. 65th Street. The evaluation of the traffic study was based on the site layout of the 76, 966 square foot building and parking ramp. The largest concern of the development is due to the additional traffic generated at the intersection of W. 65th and Valley View and W. 65th and France Avenue. Both the Valley View intersection and France Avenue intersections are closely tied to Highway 62 interchanges and County roadway network. All turn lane lengths, lane usage, turn movements and level of service will need further study to ensure, appropriate operations. W G:\EngineeringUnfrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Transportation Commission\Agendas\2008 R&R\20080515 40] OW65th _Medica]_Office_Traffic_Study.doc WSB & Associales, Inc. Infrastructure ■ Engineering ■ Planning ■ Construction Memorandum To: Wayne Houle, PE, Public Works Director /City Engineer Jack Sullivan, PE, Assistant City Engineer City of Edina From: Chuck Rickart, PE, PTOE Transportation Engineer WSB & Associates, Inc. Date: May 7, 2008 Re: Edina Crosstown Medical Building — 410 65`" Street Traffic Study Review City of Edina WSB Project No. 1686 -02 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite #300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763 541 -4600 Fax: 763 541 -1700 As requested, we have reviewed the Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Wenck Associates, Inc. for the proposed Edina Crosstown Medical Building located at 4010 65ffi Street West. The proposed development is located between France Avenue and Valley View Road on the north side of 65c' Street. The analysis included review of three development scenarios including: Scenario 1— 88,472 Square Feet of development Scenario 2 — 117,973 Square Feet of development Scenario 3 — 11.7,973 Square Feet of development and a 540 space parking ramp addition Based on our review of the Edina Crosstown Medical Building Traffic Impact Analysis, the following questions and comments are made. 1. In the existing conditions section under the existing roadway network, reference is made to Valley View Road carrying three lanes of traffic in each direction with a raised median. I believe this condition applies only to the intersections and not as a typical condition. This should be clarified and revised. 2. A figure should be provided which shows all existing lane configurations adjacent to the site including turn -lane configurations and approximate tam -lane lengths. 3. In the traffic forecasting section the 2011 no -build condition indicates the existing traffic counts were increased by 2 percent per year to determine the 2011 no -build volumes. What was the basis for the 2 percent per year growth? Were other approved developments in the area considered as part of the background no -build ,450 G;\a&.c agGwc,.116D - 69 St,.MA401D West 651h SnW\20080507 mact_Rir]�1_WSB_MBMO- .bode -050708 Mrdical B1dg.d= Wayne Houle and Jack Sullivan City of Edina May 7, 2008 Page 2 of 3 traffic? Developments such as the Westin and Target Development should be included as part of this background number. 4. The traffic generation section indicates that the traffic generation .for the orthopedic use was estimated based on anticipated staffing and scheduling. The assumptions on how this was determined should be documented. 5. Scenario 3 addition indicates a significant increase in traffic would be generated from the parking ramp. How is this determined? Typically, a parking ramp does not generate traffic, it's the uses associated with the parking ramp. If this parking ramp is providing parking for new uses, those uses should be documented as part of this study. If this parking ramp is replacing or supplementing from another use, then the diversion of traffic from those other facilities should be. documented as part of a study. 6. In the trip distribution section of the report, the distribution to France Avenue and TH 62 to the east seems low when comparing to other studies in the area. A more detailed determination of how these figures were determined should be provided. These distributions should be compared to other proposed, approved projects in the area. 7. The forecasted a.m. and p.m. peak -hour traffic volume figures (Figure 3 -1 and 3 -3) do not show the traffic volume information for the project driveways. These should be included as part of the figures and analyses. 8. As part of the Traffic Analysis, a table should be provided which documents the level of service, delay, and queue length for each approach, and overall, for each time period at each intersection. This table would be a quick reference to compare each scenario with the no -build condition. 9. The Traffic Analysis section indicates some queue analysis was completed but does not document the queue lengths and available queue storage. This should be documented specifically on France Avenue where issues have been seen. 10. The intersection of France Avenue and 65'�' Street has been a concern of the City with the existing conditions and proposed improvements to the hospital and medical buildings on the east side of France Avenue. The impacts of this development on the east side should be clearly discussed, and it should be verified that all improvements assumed as part of previous studies are included. 11. The only improvement proposed as part of the study was the change of the signal phasing on the east and west approach at 65th Street. If this change is being proposed, it will have an impact on the entire France Avenue network and should be documented as part of the study. These intersections were included. as part of the overall model provided by the City. A51 G:lEp�eaivglOmca1160 - 69 SrO.SWO]O W® 65th SQeri'20090507 mact_RiWmt W5B _MEMO-- b- W"50708 Medical Bldg.Ex Wayne Houle and Jack Sullivan City of Edina May 7, 2008 Page 3 of 3 12. This study does not document any impact from the proposed development driveways on 65th Street. The study should document their level of service and required, if any, improvements on 65 th Street.. 13. The transit impact section discusses all the transit routes located in the area. This should be expanded to include a discussion on how this development.will utilize the transit service. The purpose bf this is to help "relieve" traffic in the area and promote Travel Demand.lVManagement (TD K. 14. The bicycle and pedestrian impact section has a discussion of the sidewalks in this general area. This should be expanded showing figures of existing and proposed pedestrian facilities, as well as the pedestrian facilities proposed as part of the proposed project. Based on these comments and my general review of the site configuration and the traffic impact study, additional information and analysis should be provided before any approval recommendation can be made. Wenck File. #2047 -01 Prepared for: Crosstown Medical, LLC Prepared by: WENCK ASSOCIATES, INC. 1800 Pioneer Creek Center P.O. Box 249 Maple Plain, Minnesota 55359 -0249 (763) 479 -4200 453 Transportation Impact Analysis for Edina Crosstown Medical Building 4010 65th Street West Edina, Minnesota April 23, 2008 Wenck Executive Summary The purpose of this Transportation Impact Analysis is to evaluate the impacts of the proposed medical building located at 4010 65th Street in Edina, Minnesota, between Valley View Road and France Avenue. This study examined traffic impacts of the proposed development on the following intersections: • Valley View Road/65t' Street • Valley View Road/Westbound TH 62 Ramp • France Avenue /65`h Street • France Avenue/Eastbound TH 62 Ramp • France Avenue/Westbound TH 62 Ramp In addition to traffic related impacts, impacts to on -site parking, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and transit were also examined. Discussions with the project team and city staff resulted in the establishment of three development scenarios to be analyzed. The three scenarios are summarized below: • Scenario 1: Replaces the existing building at 4010 65th Street West with a new 88,472 square foot building which will house a 60,000 square foot orthopedic office and 28,472 square feet of medical office space. The current site plan for the proposed building is shown in Figure 1 -2. • Scenario 2: Includes the Scenario 1 development at 4010 65th Street West plus the replacement of the existing bank on the 4018 65th Street West parcel with a 29,501 square foot medical office building. • Scenario 3: Includes the Scenario 2 developments at 4010 and 4018 65th Street West plus the addition of two levels to the existing parking ramp at 6400 France Avenue South. Each of the development scenarios is expected to utilize existing access along 65th Street. The project is expected to be completed in 2010. The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development will generate 211 trips during the weekday AM peak hour and 321 trips during the weekday PM peak hour under Scenario 1, 284 AM and 431 PM peak hour trips under Scenario 2, and 432 AM and 557 PM. peak hour trips under Scenario 3. I • The study intersections of have adequate capacity with existing geometrics and control to accommodate the proposed development while maintaining acceptable levels of service. It is recommended that protective /permissive phasing be used for the eastbound and westbound approaches of 65t' Street at France Avenue to alleviate potential operations issues for the left turn movements. The development traffic is not expected to require any other changes to the existing roadway network. • With the inclusion of dedicated visitor and staff parking area, parking impacts for the proposed facility are expected to be minimal. • No significant impacts are expected to the existing transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities due to the proposed project. II ��S Table of Contents FIGURES Figure1 -1: Project Location ......................................................................... ............................... 1 -2 Figure1 -2: Site Plan ........................................................................................ ............................1 -3 Figure 2 -1: Existing Roadway Network ....................................................... ............................... 2 -3 Figure3 -1: Trip Distribution ........................................................................ ............................... 3 -3 Figure 3 -2: Forecasted AM Peak Hour Volumes ......................................... ............................... 3 -4 Figure 3 -3: Forecasted PM Peak Hour Volumes .......................................... ............................... 3 -5 Figure 4 -1: AM Peak Hour Levels of Service ..........• .................................... ............................... 4 -4 Figure 4 -2: PM Peak Hour Levels of Service .................................................. ............................4 -5 TABLES Table 3 -1: Trip Generation for Development. Scenarios ............................... ............................... 3 -2 i AS-L Page 1.0 Purpose and Background . ............................................................ .......... ............................1 -1 2.0 Existing Conditions ............................................................................ ............................... 3.0 Traffic Forecast ................................................................................... ............................... 3 -1 4.0 Traffic Analysis .......................................................... :...................................................... 4 -1 5.0 Conclusions ........................................................................................ ............................... 5 -1 6.0 Appendix ................................................ :.......................................................................... 6 -1 FIGURES Figure1 -1: Project Location ......................................................................... ............................... 1 -2 Figure1 -2: Site Plan ........................................................................................ ............................1 -3 Figure 2 -1: Existing Roadway Network ....................................................... ............................... 2 -3 Figure3 -1: Trip Distribution ........................................................................ ............................... 3 -3 Figure 3 -2: Forecasted AM Peak Hour Volumes ......................................... ............................... 3 -4 Figure 3 -3: Forecasted PM Peak Hour Volumes .......................................... ............................... 3 -5 Figure 4 -1: AM Peak Hour Levels of Service ..........• .................................... ............................... 4 -4 Figure 4 -2: PM Peak Hour Levels of Service .................................................. ............................4 -5 TABLES Table 3 -1: Trip Generation for Development. Scenarios ............................... ............................... 3 -2 i AS-L Purpose Background The purpose of this transportation impact analysis is to evaluate the impacts of the proposed medical office building located at 4010 65h Street West in Edina, Minnesota. The project location is shown in Figure 1 -1. Stuudv Intersections This study examined traffic impacts of the proposed development on the following intersections: • Valley View Road/65`h Street • Valley View Road/Westbound TH 62 Ramp • France Avenue /65th Street • France Avenue/Eastbound TH 62 Ramp • France Avenue/Westbound TH 62 Ramp In addition to traffic related impacts, impacts to on -site parking, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, and transit were also examined. Development Scenarios Discussions with the project team and city staff resulted in the establishment of three development scenarios to be analyzed. The three scenarios are summarized below: ® Scenario 1: Replaces the existing building at 4010 65th Street West with a new 88,472 square foot building which will house a 60,000 square foot orthopedic office and 28,472 square feet of medical office space. The current site plan for the proposed building is shown in Figure 1 -2. ® Scenario 2: Includes the Scenario 1 development at 4010 65th Street West plus the replacement of the existing bank on the 4018 65th Street West parcel with a 29,501 square foot medical office building. o Scenario 3: Includes the Scenario 2 developments at 4010 and 4018 65th Street West plus the addition of two levels to the existing parking ramp at 6400 France Avenue Soutl . Each of the development scenarios is expected to utilize existing access along 65th Street. The project is expected to be completed in 2010. 1 -1 A5 I WUUUM1LLN c UK. 1 w 6 J \ X I �� ST, m IE. O AVE. ac a < W• c 55 w KENT Y (� 04K i DP, yy 55 th ST. ¢o u ¢ hG ¢ a ti^ cT AVE. 55th ST. w m I LA LEXIN Y1 ONNE K 6� G TON ST. ' '< OFN 0 CT u TER. WI NO EV] ac a �c� Qe� y z ;= W. ST. AV. W. 56 th °o ST. e w A1ee�,c 24 w w ^ PL. ¢ c4 N° 2j c < c TOWER 5T, m a a P W. 57th ST. W. py ak > SOUTHVIEW LA. WDODL Alvo o w s RD RD, 0- Lu CONCORD ; r- o TER. PHIL BROOK LA. ;c O� < a a a i 4 > iN vi th ST. _w ¢ z W, 58th ST. < ✓ 9 w AVE. �^r sG GRIM ES > l o �n ° > > > ¢ < < s L, < <ST, Q W, 59th ST. ou W. 59 th ST. JF' Z W. 59 th zz ? w N = ° ST. o " > w u v Z 3 O a w w > > w o SCHDOL RD. c a o 3 <> w o '_-' ° W. c a < 60 th > CLOVE c W. 60 th o s ST. c ¢ < CLOVER J TER o ✓ x< o° w a a_ W/ z Z < 4A. RIDGE E VALLEY 7Q ° 6, 5i 5T. m ¢ ¢' o z ° u a W. 61 st ST. W. m z ° x n > ° = c V,r < ^+ /x W. J, r- PJ a R OINI N VIEiY G CH OWES /n w r 1 RD a CU RVE Q ; w• 62 nd `n E2 nd ST• ¢ Ill W. 62 nd 57. W. 62 nd ST, lV�_ O w o �a 33. J z < L4• ; a < " c HERITAGt W• 62 ntl z GARRI SOry w > .". a ++ c q > < u < J m DR. 63 th ST• a u 35. r L 35. = 11 W W w > ¢ ¢° c >c e a a vxi o m W, 64 th ST. h ST, 64 th ST. < ¢ 62 z r °¢ s PROJECT ¢ c LOCATION w v 0 OR ROYCAR BA_FANZ ¢ ����' �Q > N of R, � PAYTON RD. o c DCE apP < UPPER RD. P PL4 lq ° Jo LL i a > ? > > c ; u 65th 5T. cr } 31 ° C c W. 0 65 th ST. _ ¢ `T0 p A ST. DVA'BERRY b q Lj a o 100 ; °' C of 1 W. o < ° 5T. m 66th ST. v'' c ANDDVER w RD. < W. z 66th o i a < i c UTH DAI 'z � c o w ( Y z z w G °mat —= o TR s PROJECT ¢ c LOCATION w v 0 OR ROYCAR BA_FANZ ¢ ����' �Q > N of R, � PAYTON RD. o c DCE apP CT. UPPER RD. P PL4 lq N Wf -TER. o DUDS Ory Ct °O� HE oP LA, h~ 2 64th ORD WAY 2 4 r z �� y° 13 W. 69th ST. `T0 p A ST. DVA'BERRY b q 38. a o 100 of pABGy W. o 70th ao DR, c ANDDVER w RD. < < . ' o i a < i c 31. HOLBORN AVE. LARt SAGq MAVELL E o w m DR. 32. RDLF AVE. ASP C 8EL ViDERE 4Siq LAREAf Lq o N zo 33. ROBERTS PL. RD- r ORE C ¢ x z o HAZEL70N CSR, LORE TRr�I l4 ASPASIA 14 ° m 34, BIRCHCREST DP,. D ��1 D 25. fGM L9CIR, W, u w Z 72 T tlLA. \ 0 0 a T. 9lS 36. NANCY LORTH p DR. ¢ 2 v �ipoc Z 37, MILLER'S LA. c c = 38. CHURCH PL. ST. o hlglSCUS 0I J3 oQ > FONDELL DR. ° Q PHLOX ; CILFOPD DR. a w z o w u w S DR. ¢ uj o r b W LA. < o= a c L° W AVE. TRANSPORTATION IMPACT Wenck ANALYSIS FOR EDiNA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING Ayt Iw-I 1 169 LZ w ti w Li > > > > > a < < < c W. 70 W, 70 Ln w W'' 71st RICI x 201 cT - ' N C o APPROXIMATE SCALE V 0 1600' FIGURE 1 -1 PROJECT LOCATION HE Iw-I 1 169 LZ w ti w Li > > > > > a < < < c W. 70 W, 70 Ln w W'' 71st RICI x 201 cT - ' N C o APPROXIMATE SCALE V 0 1600' FIGURE 1 -1 PROJECT LOCATION .... ---- ----- -- - - - - - - - - - - -•- - -•- - - - -•- . . . - - - - Wenck TREE T VV TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING FIGURE 1-2 SITE PLAN SERVICE ACCESS, APPROXIMATE SCALE 0 60 200 Existing COnditi0ns The proposed site currently consists of a single building containing general office and medical office uses. The project site is on the block bounded by TH 62 on the north, Valley View Road on the west; 65th Street on the south, and France Avenue to the east. The development property is situated to the east of the existing bank on the northeast comer of the Valley View Road/65`h Street West intersection and to the west of the existing hospital parking garage. Full access is provided onto 65`h Street at two locations. Existing Roadway Network One lane of travel in each direction and a two -way left -turn lane are provided on 65th Street. Valley View Road carries three lanes of traffic in each direction with a raised median south of TH 62. North of TH 62, Valley View Road carries one lane of traffic in each direction. France Avenue carries three lanes of traffic in each direction with a raised median south of TH 62. North of TH 62, France Avenue carries two lanes of traffic in each direction. The existing roadway network adjacent to the development property is shown in Figure 2 -1. The signalized intersection of Valley View Road and 65th Street provides one lane shared by left turn and right -turn movements on the westbound approach. The eastbound approach, which serves as the eastbound exit ramp from TH 62, consists of one shared through/left -turn lane and one free -flow right -turn lane. The northbound approach consists of three through lanes and one channelized right -turn lane. The southbound approach consists of one left -tum lane and one through lane. The southbound left turn operates on a permissive basis. Split phasing is used for the eastbound and westbound approaches. This intersection shares a controller with the intersection of Valley View Road and the westbound on ramp to TH 62. The intersection of Valley View Road and the westbound on ramp to TH 62 consists of two exclusive left-turn lanes and one through lane on the northbound approach, and one through lane and one exclusive right -turn lane on the southbound approach. The northbound left turn operates with protected phasing. This intersection shares a controller with the intersection of Valley View Road and 65`h Street. The signalized intersection of France Avenue and 65h Street provides one dedicated left turn lane, one through lane and one right -turn lane on the westbound approach. The eastbound approach consists of one left -turn lane and one through/right -turn lane. The northbound approach consists of an exclusive left -turn lane, three through lanes, and one exclusive right -tum lane. The southbound approach consists of one left -turn lane, two through lanes and one through/right -tum lane. The left turns from France Avenue operate on a protected basis.. Permissive phasing is used on the 65`h Street approaches. The signalized intersection of France Avenue and the eastbound entrance ramp from TH 62 provides of one shared through/left -turn lane and one free right -turn lane on the eastbound 2 -1 A approach. The northbound approach consists of two through lanes and one channelized right - turn lane. The southbound approach carries two through lanes and one exclusive left -turn lane. The southbound left turn lane operates using protective /permissive phasing. The signalized intersection of France Avenue and the westbound entrance ramp from TH 62 provides one exclusive left -turn lane and one shared left/through/right -turn lane. The northbound approach consists of one left turn lane and two through lanes. The southbound approach carries one through lane and one shared through/right -turn lane. The northbound left turn operates with protective /permissive phasing. Existing Traffic Data Turning movement volumes were obtained from the City of Edina for the AM and PM peak hours at the study intersections. Traffic counts were conducted at the existing access points for 4010 65h Street West during the AM and PM peak hour in December 2007. Traffic counts were conducted at the parking garage access during the AM and PM peak hours on March 26, 2008. 2 -2 AW Ak ILI l +. f i s, * Study Intersection t U9 ONO �• r b. ° e � �� ixuau t a r- N; t ff or, of a PRO, . tPt►T tiNt1 _ if f:M �wV i.erf� wi N APPROXIMATE SCALE 0 240' TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FIGURE 2 -1 I �^ ANALYSIS FOR EDINA Wenck CROSSTOWN MEDICAL EXISTING ROADWAY BUILDING NETWORK ��a 3.0 Traffic Forecast To adequately address the impacts of the proposed project, forecasts and analyses were completed for the year 2011. Weekday AM and PM peak hour traffic forecasts were completed for the following scenarios: ® Existing (2007): Existing volumes were obtained at the subject intersections from the City of Edina. ® 2011 No- Build: Existing volumes at the subject intersections were increased by two percent per year to determine 2011 no -build volumes. ' ® 2011 Scenario 1: Trips generated by the proposed Scenario 1 development were added to the 2011 no -build volumes and trips generated by the existing building at 4010 65th Street West were subtracted to determine 2011 Scenario 1 build volumes. 0 2011 Scenario 2: Trips generated by replacing the existing bank at 4018 65th Street West with medical office space were added to the Scenario 1 volumes and trips generated by the existing bank were subtracted to determine 2011 Scenario 2 build volumes. ® 2011 Scenario 3: Trips generated by the proposed expansion of the parking ramp at 6400 France Avenue South in Scenario 3 were added to the 2011 Scenario 2 volumes to determine 2011 Scenario 3 build volumes. Trip Generation Weekday AM and PM peak hour trip generation for the orthopedic use was estimated based on the anticipated staffing and scheduling of the business. Generation for the proposed medical office development was calculated based on data presented in the seventh edition of Trip Generation, published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). Trip generation for the parking ramp addition in Scenario 3 was estimated based on the observed rate of generation and approximate number of spaces created by the addition of two levels. 3 -1 The resultant trip generation is shown in Table 3 -1. TABLE 3 -1: WEEKDAY TRIP GENERATION FOR DEVELOPMENT SCENARIOS Due to the nature of the land uses, it was assumed that no internal, diverted, or pass -by trips would occur with the proposed development. Trip Distribution Trip distribution percentages for the subject development trips were established based on the nearby roadway network, existing and expected future traffic patterns, and location of the subject development in relation to major attractions and population concentrations. The distribution percentages for trips generated by the proposed development are shown in Figure 3 -1. Trips generated by the expanded parking ramp trips traveling through the TH 62 ramps on France Avenue were distributed based on the existing traffic patterns. Traffic Assignment The development trips for Scenarios 1, 2 and 3 were assigned to the surrounding roadway network using the preceding trip distribution percentages. Traffic volumes were established for all the forecasting scenarios described earlier during both the weekday AM and PM peak hours. The resultant traffic volumes are presented in Figure 3 -2 and Figure 3 -3. 3 -2 Development Size AM Peak Hour Enterin Exitin Total PM Peak Hour Enterin Eidting Total Scenario 1 Orthopedic Office 60,000 s . ft. 112 28 140 61 154 1=3 215 Medical Office 28,472 s .,ft. 56 15 71 29 77 106 Scenario 1 Total 168 43 211 90 231 Scenario 2 Ortho edic Office 60,000 s . ft. 112 28 140 61 154 215 Medical Office 57,973 s . ft. 114 30 144 58 158 216 Scenario 2 Totalll 226 58 284 119 312 431 Scenari o 3 Ortho edic Office 60,000 s . ft. 112 28 140 61 154 215 Medical Office 57,973 s . ft. 114 30 144 58 158 216 Parldna Ramp Addition 540 spaces 118 30 148 17 109 126 Scenario 3 TotaIll 344 =8F 432 136 421 557 Due to the nature of the land uses, it was assumed that no internal, diverted, or pass -by trips would occur with the proposed development. Trip Distribution Trip distribution percentages for the subject development trips were established based on the nearby roadway network, existing and expected future traffic patterns, and location of the subject development in relation to major attractions and population concentrations. The distribution percentages for trips generated by the proposed development are shown in Figure 3 -1. Trips generated by the expanded parking ramp trips traveling through the TH 62 ramps on France Avenue were distributed based on the existing traffic patterns. Traffic Assignment The development trips for Scenarios 1, 2 and 3 were assigned to the surrounding roadway network using the preceding trip distribution percentages. Traffic volumes were established for all the forecasting scenarios described earlier during both the weekday AM and PM peak hours. The resultant traffic volumes are presented in Figure 3 -2 and Figure 3 -3. 3 -2 4W V40 .......... a Ar Is- -x:r N t APPROXIMATE SCALE 0 400, TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FIGURE 3-1 ANALYSIS FOR EDINA TOWN MEDICAL Wenck CROSSTOWN TRIP DISTRIBUTION AK M C w r � m m O C © M CD nmi m e ew w M TO WESTBOUND US 62 �. `1 62 It �v e� N [+) Ib M m N N N N in O N o, o w� M �a m m m �W FROM EASTBOUND US 62 40143/43/43/43 2611263/3321350 1389 452!4894891489 /489 0 0 c 3 f� wr- �m M � C� M � aim M � M M At- 86183/ 107/116/ 133 f-- 9/10114115117 N N O ea N� N_ g O r Ln TO WESTBOUND US 62 FROM EASTBOUND US 62 7 5181 /8 1 /81 /8 1 --+ 220212 -> 312/3381335/3351344 -q, 2007 Existing AM Peak Hour Volumes 2011 No Build AM Peak Hour Volumes 2011 Scenario 1 AM Peak Hour Volumes 2011 Scenario 2 AM Peak Hour Volumes 2011 Scenario 3 AM Peak Hour Volumes XXIXXIXXIXxfxx _ Wenck 6TH STRE- FROM WESTBOUND US 62 't- 170/184/164/184 /184 F ?1212128 f- 4 1 614 5 014 72/4 7 5/4 9D IT mw mo �M �g mo 00 � M NC �O C> CO Om Q� � N m m m m _mom m� oa f : EaS?BOUN:,'JS E-. t M O r h O �V �w O N °a <m o "a QQ w N M m 1� � C � Mw h w M [�wN �hw II� hII N C W 51155!62166!69 -J` 't- 1311142!1 4 211 42 /1 42 1 51/163 1 63/1 63/1 71 E 23125125/25125 16!17/22125125 -7 �- LL IT� 2 ONQ > 047 m l7 Z <Cb CC) Ln a?� �e� N NOT TO SCALE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL BUILDING A64 FIGURE 3 -2 FORECASTED AM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES m N ia" g r tog ua m TO WESTBDUND US 62 W TH 62 it coo �N �m cog is a m o� m� mN FROM EASTBOUND US 62 I � 6 `65TH STREET 28130808080 –J` 571821901100/103 –0, 381/4121412/4121412 0 TI m Ea m m �m m m a� Co m b TO WESTBOUND US 62 FROM EASTBDUND US 62 61188!8816888 -` DOOM � 179!194/193/1831193 2007 Existing PM Peak Hour Volumes 2011 No Build PM Peak Hour Volumes 2011 Scenario 1 PM Peak Hour Volumes 2011 Scenario 2 PM Peak Hour Volumes 2011 Scenario 3 PM Peak Hour Volumes 65TH STREET FROM WESTBOUND US 62 -*L– 2651287!287/2871287 F 0rorororo �r 3301357867/3731374 IT rO IS -5 m O R COP I I TO EASTBOUND US 62 P, �a o� �i O� O� O. o; J4 m O�a � O a Jy6 86195114411621181 1 0 9111 8111a/118/142 -� 1 1 8/1281 5111 8211 87 TRANSPORTATION IMPACT V V en1.. ANALYSIS FOR EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL ,��ek BUILDING W ` 322849849849849 g 87/9121/121/129 lT� O N � O � Aa° gs; a m 0 N NOTTO SCALE FIGURE 3-3 FORECASTED PM PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC VOLUMES 4.0 Traffic Analysis Traffic analyses were completed for the subject intersections for all scenarios described earlier during both the weekday AM and PM peak hours using Synchro software. The analysis was completed using the analysis network obtained from the City of Edina for the study area. The initial analyses assumed no changes to existing intersection geometrics and control. Capacity analysis results are presented in terms of level of service (LOS), which range from A to F. LOS A represents the best intersection operation, with very little delay for each vehicle using the intersection. LOS F represents the worst intersection operation, with excessive delay for each vehicle using the intersection. Level of service results at the study intersections for each of the analysis scenarios are shown in Figure 4 -1 and Figure 4 -2. An analysis of each intersection is presented below. Valley View Road and 65th Street. The intersection as a whole operates at LOS B during the weekday AM peak hour under all analysis scenarios. During the AM peak hour, all movements operate at LOS D or better under all analysis scenarios. During the weekday PM peak hour, the overall intersection operates at LOS B under existing conditions and LOS C under all future scenarios. All movements operate at LOS D or better under all analysis scenarios during the p.m. peak hour. No improvements are necessary at this intersection to accommodate the proposed development. • Valley View Road and Westbound TH 62 Ramp. The intersection as a whole operates at LOS B during the weekday AM peak hour under all analysis scenarios. During the AM peak hour, all movements operate at LOS D or better under existing, 2011 No Build, 2011 Scenario 1, and 2011 Scenario 2 conditions. Under the 2011 Scenario 3 conditions, the northbound left tam operates at LOS E. Further analysis indicates that no queuing issues are expected for the northbound left turn movement despite the LOS E condition. During the weekday PM peak hour, the overall intersection operates at LOS C under all scenarios. During the PM peak hour, all movements operate at LOS D or better under existing and 2011 No Build conditions. Under the 2011 Scenario 1, 2011 Scenario 2, and 2011 Scenario 3 conditions, the northbound left turn operates at LOS E. Once again, further analysis indicates that no queuing issues are expected for the northbound left turn movement despite the LOS E condition. No improvements are necessary at this intersection to accommodate the proposed development. France Avenue and 65th Street: The intersection as a whole operates at LOS B during the weekday AM peak hour under the existing, 2011 No Build, 2011 Scenario 1, and 2011 Scenario 2 conditions. Under the 2011 Scenario 3 conditions, the intersection 4 -1 �r t operates at LOS C. During the AM peak hour, all movements operate at LOS D or better under all scenarios. During the weekday PM peak hour, the overall intersection operates at LOS B under existing and 2011 No Build conditions. Under the 2011 Scenario 1, 2011 Scenario 2, and 2011 Scenario 3 conditions, the intersection operates at LOS C. The southbound left turn operates at LOS E under all scenarios during the PM peak hour. With the existing signal phasing, the westbound left turn operates at LOS F under all scenarios. The remaining movements operate at LOS D or better under existing and 2011 No Build conditions. Under the 2011 Scenario 1, 2011 Scenario 2, and 2011 Scenario 3 conditions, the eastbound left turn operates at LOS E. To improve the intersection operations, protective /permissive phasing for the eastbound and westbound left turns is recommended. This would improve the eastbound and westbound left turns to LOS D or better during the PM peak hour. The southbound left tam would still operate at LAS E under all scenarios, but further analysis indicates that no queuing issues are expected for this movement during the PM peak hour. • France Avenue and Eastbound TH 62 Ramps: The intersection as a whole operates at LOS A during the weekday AM peak hour under all analysis scenarios. During the AM peak hour, all movements operate at LOS D or better under all scenarios. During the weekday PM peak hour, the overall intersection operates at LOS A under all scenarios. All movements operate at LOS D or better under all scenarios, excluding the eastbound left turn and through movements, which operate at LOS E. Once again, farther analysis indicates that no queuing issues are expected for the eastbound movements despite the LOS E condition. No improvements are necessary at this intersection to accommodate the proposed development. • France Avenue & Westbound TH 62 Ramps: The intersection as a whole operates at LOS C during the weekday AM peak hour under all analysis scenarios. During the AM peak hour, all movements operate at LOS D or better under all analysis scenarios. During the weekday PM peak hour, the overall intersection operates at LOS C under all scenarios. All movements operate at LOS D or better under all analysis scenarios during the PM peak hour. No improvements are necessary at this intersection to accommodate the proposed development. 4 -2 A `p1 Parking Impacts The proposed project includes approximately 420 on -site parking stalls to accommodate all visitor and staff needs. The project will not impact any off -site parking facilities or any on- street parking areas. Transit Impacts Existing transit routes are located on Valley View Road, France Avenue and 65h Street. The Southdale Transit Center is located a few blocks southeast of the proposed development. Bus stops are located along Valley View Road, 65th Street and France Avenue. Routes 6, 152, 587 and 631 provide regular transit service to this area. The proposed development is not expected to significantly impact the need for transit service in this area. Maps of the existing transit routes are shown in the Appendix. Bicycle and Pedestrian Impacts Sidewalks are provided along all streets surrounding the proposed project. The proposed project will include access from the building to the existing sidewalk system. No significant impacts to the sidewalk system are expected due to the proposed project. 4 -3 I3 1% TO WESTBOUND US 62 y 1 TH 62 it �a ea oa am( FROM EASTBOUND US 62 9 D/DCIC D/DlD"C/C � AIAIAIAIA T� � c3 65TH STREET � B/B/B/BIB UU U C� CZ t� mm TO WE US 62 C/C/C/C/C FROM WESTSOUND US 62 4- C/C/ii/= 1 � D/D /D/D `1 T as as FROM EASTBOUND US 62 I I D/D/D/D/D WIND/DID —41 AIAIAIA/A T a a; aae aao 65TH STREET j TO EASTBOUND US 62 D/DID/D/D '� sraaA/A D/D/D/D/D �1 F DM �� D/D/D/D/D �, � W � a 2007 Existing AM Peak Hour Level of Service N 2011 No Build AM Peak Hour Level of Service 2011 Scenario 1 AM Peak Hour Level of Service 2011 Scenario 2 AM Peak Hour Level of Service I I 2011 Scenario 3 AM Peak Hour Level of Service I I NOT TO SCALE NOTE ALL RESULTS SHOWN ASSUME EXISTING CONTROLAND GEOMETRICS. TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FIGURE 41 AW ���� ANALYSIS FOR EDINA CROSSTOWN MEDICAL AM PEAK HOUR BUILDING LEVELS OF SERVICE �1 TO WESTBOUND US 62 C y TH 62 it �a a oa 93 c333 U mL FROM EASTBOUND US 62 9 D/D/D/D/D DAJAIA� T� e3 C313m 65TH STREET 9IS/s/C/C ee ee TO WESTBOUND US 62 1 C/C/GC/C FROM WESTBOUND US 62 A/B/B1B/B 1 �D �a �a �a J a� a� as FROM EASTBOUND US 62 I EEVEfE EIVEOE / Q Q as 65TH STREET 1 1 D/D/D/D/D —� D/D/D/D/D 2007 Existing PM Peak Hour Level of Service 2011 No Build PM Peak Hour Level of Service 2011 Scenario 1 PM Peak Hour Level of Service 2011 Scenario 2 PM Peak Hour Level of Service 2011 Scenario 3 PM Peak Hour Level of Service NOTE ALL RESULTS SHOWN ASSUME EXISTING CONTROLAND GEOMETRICS. TRANSPORTATION IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR EDINA �._���}`�`� enck CROSSTOWN MEDICAL _ 'ice V V BUILDING T a TO EASTBOUND US 62 eaa oaa 4— AIA/A/AIA V- /F/FIF FIGURE 4 -2 N NOT TO SCALE PM PEAK HOUR LEVELS OF SERVICE 5.0 Conclusions The conclusions drawn from the information and analyses presented in this report are as follows: • The proposed development will generate 211 trips during the weekday AM peak hour and 321 trips during the weekday PM peak hour under Scenario 1, 284 AM and 431 PM peak hour trips under Scenario 2, and 432 AM and 557 PM peak hour trips under Scenario 3. • The study intersections of have adequate capacity with existing geometrics and control to accommodate the proposed development while maintaining acceptable levels of service. It is recommended that protective /permissive phasing be used for the eastbound and westbound approaches of 65t' Street at France Avenue to alleviate potential operations issues for the left turn movements. The development traffic is not expected to require any other changes to the existing roadway network. • With the inclusion of dedicated visitor and staff parking area, parking impacts for the proposed facility are expected to be minimal. • No significant impacts are expected to the existing transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities due to the proposed project. 5 -1 2 Q,, 2 Industrial E Park r C Dewey Hill ram -, A _ ofeL 2 a O O V J: LAKE ., CORNELIA I �I 1l 001 69th St i Q l 6 -1 m Southdale Shopping Center 65th St LL0 I•, 13 Southdale Transit Center 9th St 0th St Metro Transit Routes: S05 (29W m BeLine Routes: SW Metro: antennial akes ark 76th St Minnesota Drive and France Ave Metro Transit Routes: S. - � W W, BeLine Route: MVTA: A-74 Cub Foods r Route 152 d IM—d'' I nii a P u 6 -2 kl S Minn. St. PE Inter Airpc Route 587 6 -3 .A 76 7 Route 631 62 .- 100 ROUTE 631 ❑ TIME POINT A PARK & RIDE .- 100 ,.A77 Fairview Soot6dale Hospital a W 65TH ST. X W 66TH ST. 0 W d W 68TH ST. OC e T W a STOPS BY DOOR 13 N a „ , ALSO SERVED BY `J MTS1S8 a BE UNE S39 0 ,.A77 a 2. The developer shall fund appropriate improvements to correct intersection decencies resulting from the further study of adjacent intersection at and York as required in WSB's May 7, 2008, memo. 3. The right -in /right -out from the site along 69th Street as stated i e traffic report date April 23, 2008, does not coincide with the site pl supplied by the developer. The plan shows a site access that could used as a full access, however, the current configuration and stripin f 69th Street does t allow full operation. Clarification of this intersec ' n will be required as p of the approval. _ Representing the evelopment were Robb Miller develgggl with TE Miller Development; Dean olis, architect with DJR Archi ture lno;; nd Michael Klobucar, traffic engineer with We k Associates, Inc. Mr. M' r saidt�s arable to improving 69th Street because it 11 benefit their pr erty; however, ini�beference to the intersection, he said they s Id not be requ' d to u�'ie a pre- exist�g:problem that will not be negatively imps d by the evelo��. He was informed by chair Workinger that who pays for a im ovemevould be decided by--14�.uncil. In reference to the right -in /right -out, lobucar --said this is no - longer an issue= Yecause they have eliminated some entries/ and instead= rill hav_ access to the site. Chair W/eD asked for a ranceA--ha elivery trucks�;will not use W. 70th Street to access tMr. Dovol' said drivel 'ven direct& s.to use the major freeways but withking sy em they canAwk . ee the routes-the drivers will take. He said the outs ould discourage m ro ii W. 701 because it is no longer the faste. -- _ -- - Commission lone -Ao approv 196— trafFic tudy as recommended by staff an e. deare`toper pro�des an assurance tha . 70th Street will not be used by tft-rii Cs. The motion was seconded by Co issioner Bonneville. AI I vo __ _ Mo n carried. _ - b. -E4( 0 W. -65 treet`":9�Grosstown Medical LLC The "f Edina's traa#�con t, Chuck Rickart of WSB, said the 65th Street and France Aventf�- =. was: a malcg�qoncern for this redevelopment; however, he said the deveoopee-'-s. traffic consultaf .has recommended upgrading the intersection with a 'protective permissive signal phasing' traffic light. Mr. Rickart said staff is withholding a recommendation at this time 6erati.se there at= -still some issues to be addressed. Staff's position is as follows: Currently, s#aff . a.- 'our traffic consultant, WSB, feel that this transportation submittal is noi�complete. Staff, WSB and Wenck are working to resolve the outstanding items listed in the attached memo prior to the Edina Transportation Commission meeting on May 15, 2008. Currently, the conditions of the approval are: 1. This development shall address all comments in WSB's May 7, 2008, memo to the satisfaction of the ETC and Engineering Department. 2. To participate in appropriate cost sharing for signal improvements at 65th Street and France Avenue. 2 . Vt Representing the developer were Ed Terhaar, traffic engineer, with Wenck Associates and Mark Hansen, architect with Mohagen Hansen. Mr. Hansen said they are willing to work with both the City and County to upgrade the 65t" Street and France Avenue intersection Commissioner Wanninger motioned to accept the traffic study with staffs recommendation and that the developer works with the City and County to improvement the intersection at 65th Street and France Avenue. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Mooty. 7 voted aye. 1 abstain (Brown). Motion carried. V. Approval of Minutes a. Regular Meeting of A pril 17, 2008 Commissioner Plan le requested that the resolution-,fFa-t­-was approved dt-the April 17 meeting be included as part f the meeting minutes. Tb6 wing change is to be made to Page 2, para. 1, "...reviewing the composition of the however, ..the composition: :.will remain the same." Page 2, para. 2, "Commissioners Brown,-4J,§em and -hair Workinger will meet with the consultant..." Commissioner Wanninger motionedj pprove the rfi-inutes of April 17, 2008, with the above changes. The motion was sed6n&d 7-by: Comm issio.ner Brown. All voted aye. Motion carried. V1. Planning Commi §Iion Update (Commissioner Brown) ... f� p Commissioner Brow-6-_'§d id regionall- y-developrh:kt has been down. He said at their upcoming May 28 meeting thiryaivill the two'd6velopments that were presented tonight. VII. Staff Liaison Cohiment9_Af+o6fefz- a. E_M--�N-brhber Orientation ' With oni�!16W membi5ron boat -:and another expected fairly soon, Sharon Allison reported that staff 7i;a u le a 66� W-- member orientation for mid-June. The orientation would be like to sch open for -all to attend. b. Transit for LivablOECommunities The Engineering Departmbrit has applied for four grants from the Transit for Livable Communities. T-he-Jour gTafit- -applications are for: 1. City-wid&F_&destrian and Bicycle Route Marking and Signage Improvements 2. Bicycle Marking and Signage Improvements and Pedestrian Connection Improvements along 54 th Street 3. Upgraded Pedestrian/Bicycle Tunnel at York Avenue 4. Information Accessibility Improvements VIII. Adjournment Meeting adjourned. 3 P� U DRAFT MINUTE SUMMARY ZONING BOARD MEETING AUGUST 7, 2008 IN ATTENDANCE: Chair Mike Fischer, Scott Davidson and Bernadette Hornig B -08 -22 Crosstown Medical LLC 4010 65th Street West, Edina, MN Request: Multiple Variances Planner Teague informed the Board the applicant is proposing to tear down the existing two -story, 26,000 square foot office building to build a 75,017 square foot, four -story medical office building with a five -level attached parking ramp. Continuing, Planner Teague reported the project;has received preliminary approval by the City Council as recommended by the Planning Commission. Planner Teague stated the proposal requires the following variances: a. Front building setback variance from 74 feet to 52 feet. (A 22 -foot variance.) b. Rear building setback variance from 74 feet to 20 feet. (A 54 -foot variance.) c. Side building setback variance from 74 feet to 20 feet. (A 54 -foot variance.) d. Front parking structure setback variance from 67 feet to 18 feet. (A 49 -foot variance.) e. Rear parking structure setback variance from 67 feet to 20 feet. (A 47 -foot variance.) f. Side parking structure setback variance from 57 feet to 10 feet. (A 47 -foot variance.) g. A side yard drive -aisle setback variance from 10 feet to 3 feet. (A 6.7 -foot variance.) h. Minimum tract area variance from 10 acres to 2 acres. (An 8 acre variance.) L A parking stall variance from 393 stalls to 373 stalls. (A 20 -stall variance.) Planner Teague concluded staff recommends approval of the requested variances based on the following findings: 1. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the shape and limited depth of the lot, especially the western half of the site. 2. The variance would meet the intent of the ordinance because the building is reasonably sized given the allowed FAR in the RMD district is 1.0. The proposed FAR is .85. 3. The height of the ramp and building are generally consistent with buildings and ramps in the area. 4. The site's location adjacent to Crosstown Highway 62. kTo 5. The high water table prevents the parking from being constructed under ground. 6. The site is an extension of the RMD District to the east. 7. The site would have adequate parking. 8. The site is located in close proximity to bus lines and bicycle parking will be provided. Mark Hansen with Mohagen Hansen Arch Group was present representing Crosstown Medical LLC. Member Davidson asked the reason the height of the proposed ramp was reduced. Planner Teague explained reducing the ramp would soften the overall mass of the project. Chair Fischer explained he also serves on the Planning Commission and the Commission was also concerned with sustainability, adding a number of Commissioners felt the current Code (in some instances) requires more parking than needed. Continuing Chair Fischer pointed out the convenient location of the proposed medical office building to mass - transit and other amenities were important factors in reducing the mass of the ramp. Chair Fischer asked if anyone in the audience would like to speak on the project. No public was present. Mr. Hansen, Mohagen Hansen Arch Group, Wayzata, MN, addressed the Board and with graphics highlighted aspects of the project. Mr. Hansen said their goal was to be respectful to the neighborhood with the development team taking a more sensitive approach in designing the ramp and office building. Continuing, Mr. Hansen explained the site is encumbered with an. existing.high water table that made it very difficult to have below -grade parking. Mr. Hansen said with further study it was found that they would be able to extend the north bay partially below -grade to reduce mass. Concluding, Mr. Hansen asked for support from the Board. Member Davidson said in his opinion a hardship exists on this site because of the unique shape, size and depth of the lot. Member Davison said the proposed building matches the character of the neighborhood and is of reasonable size. Continuing, Member Davidson complimented the development team, adding the LEED Certification, and addition of 20 bike stalls, the location to mass- transit, the quality of the design, the significant improvement to the site, and attention paid to landscaping created a project worth supporting Member Davidson moved variance approval based on the unique shape and depth of the lot and the high water table found in the area reduces the opportunity to construct parking stalls below ground; these two points are significant in approval. Approval is also based on staff findings. Member Hornig seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. gi QC�• $ . III. NEW BUSINESS: 0` P -08-6 Final Development Plan and Final Rezoning Crosstown Medical LLC 401065 th Street West, Edina, MN Staff Presentation: Planner Teague presented his staff report reminding the Commission the proposed project has received Preliminary Approval by the City Council, per Planning Commission recommendation. Planner Teague stated the proposal requires the following: 1. Final Rezoning from Planned Office District -1 (POD -1) to Regional Medical District (RMD). The Fairview parking ramp rezoning is not requested, per Planning- Commission and City Council recommendation. 2. Final Development Plan with variances from the RMD standards Planner Teague explained per the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the City Council, the applicant has addressed concerns over the height of the parking ramp. Thirteen (13) feet of height have been taken off the parking ramp, and six (6) feet off of the stairwell. The Commission should also note that by reducing the height of the parking structure, the size of the variances requested for the parking structure is also reduced; however they are now short 20 parking stalls. Planner Teague concluded staff recommends that the City Council approve the Final Development Plan and Rezoning for the proposed Crosstown Medical building at 401065th Street West based on the following findings: 1. The rezoning would be an extension of the RMD district to the east. 2. The rezoning would be consistent with the City's guide plan. 3. The increase in density could be supported by existing roadways, as determined in the traffic study done by Wenck and Associates. 4. The rezoning would be consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Approval is also subject to the following conditions: ASL 5 1. The site must be developed and maintained in conformance with the following plans, unless modified by the conditions below: • Site plan date stamped June 30, 2008. • Grading plan date stamped June 30, 2008. • Landscaping plan date stamped June 30, 2008. • Building elevations date stamped July 17, 2008. �he Roof plan date stamped June 30, 2008 2. following must be submitted to the city before the city issues a building permit: a. A final landscape plan for staff approval. Additional over - story coniferous trees must be planted along the north lot line to further break up the mass of the structure, and provide year round screening. b. A copy of the recorded resolution with the county. 3. The property owner is responsible for replacing any required landscaping that dies. 4. Submit a copy of the Nine Mile Creek Watershed District permit. The city may require revisions to the approved plans to meet the district's requirements. 5. All storm water from this site must be treated on -site. 6. Compliance with the conditions required by the City engineer in his memo dated May 22, 2008. 7. Compliance with the conditions required by the Transportation Commission. 8. The design and construction of the entire project must be done with the Sustainable Initiatives as outlined in the applicant's narrative within the staff report. 9. Trail and sidewalk connections must be included as demonstrated on the preliminary plans. Public easements must be established over all public sidewalks. 10. All buildings must be built with sprinkler systems, subject to review and approval of the Fire Marshal. 11. Per Section 850.10. Subd. 3.13 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, a letter of credit, performance bond or cash deposit must be submitted in the amount equal to 150% of the proposed landscaping. 12. Off - street provision of 19 bicycle parking spaces must be provided on site, subject to approval of the City engineer. Planner Teague stated staff also recommends that the Zoning Board of Appeals and the City Council approve the following variances at 4010 65th Street West for Crosstown Medical LLC: 1. Front building setback variance from 74 feet to 52 feet. (A 22 -foot variance.) R 2. Rear building setback variance from 74 feet to 20 feet. (A 54 -foot variance.) 3. Side building setback variance from 74 feet to 20 feet. (A 54 -foot variance.) 4. Front parking structure setback variance from 67 feet to 18 feet. (A 49 -foot variance.) 5. Rear parking structure setback variance from 67 feet to 20 feet. (A 47 -foot variance.) 6. Side parking structure setback variance from 57 feet to 10 feet. (A 47 -foot variance.) 7. A side yard drive -aisle setback variance from 10 feet to 3 feet. (A 6.7 -foot variance.) 8. Minimum tract area variance from 10 acres to 2 acres (An 8 acre variance.) 9. A parking stall variance from 393 stalls to 373 stalls. (A 20 -stall variance.) variance approval is based on the following findings: 1. There is a unique hardship to the property caused by the shape and limited depth of the lot, especially the western half of the site. 2. The variance would meet the intent of the ordinance because the building is reasonably sized given the allowed FAR in the RMD district is 1.0. The proposed FAR is .85. 3. The height of the ramp and building are generally consistent with buildings and ramps in the area. 4. The site's location adjacent to Crosstown Highway 62. 5. The high water table prevents the parking from being constructed under ground. 6. The site is an extension of the RMD District to the east. 7. The site would have adequate parking. Appearing for the Applicant: Mark Hansen, Mohagen Hansen Architectural Group, Allan Hill and Dr. Holte were present representing Crosstown Medical LLC Comments and Questions from the Commission: Commissioner Risser asked Planner Teague the number of residents that expressed concern about noise emitting from the Fairview Southdale Hospital parking ramp. Planner Teague responded to date he has received two calls from residents that indicated since Fairview Southdale constructed the parking ramp their neighborhood is noisier. They expressed concern that the proposed parking ramp would do the same. Fl 84 7 Commissioner Schroeder questioned if the site would be irrigated. Planner Teague responded in the affirmative. Commissioner Brown told the Commission he will abstain from the vote, but will participate in the discussion. Applicant Presentation: Mr. Hansen and Mr. Hill gave a power point presentation re- highlighting the project and highlighting the changes to the plan including, a major change that eliminated one level of the parking ramp. Public Comment: Chair Lonsbury asked if anyone was present that would like to speak to the project. No public was present. Comments from the Commission: Chair Lonsbury commented that at the previous meeting of the Commission he voted against the project, but since that time he has revised his thinking and can support the project as presented. Continuing, Chair Lonsbury complimented the design team on their thorough job in presenting the project and responding to comments from the Commission and Council. Commissioner Risser also complimented the applicants on reducing the height of the supporting ramp. A discussion ensued with the majority of Commissioners expressing their support for the, proposal and complimenting the design team on the project. Commission Action: Commissioner Fischer moved to recommend Final Rezoning and Final Development Plan approval with variances based on staff findings and subject to staff conditions including amended #5. Commissioner Forrest seconded the motion. Further discussion: Commissioner Schroeder suggested that an additional finding be added, that one item he found interesting about the proposal was the LEED scoring that identified points taken for access to bike and transit, however; they didn't accommodate that in the parking accounts, indicating they are 20 spaces short. Being so close to mass - transit with bicycle parking would offset the loss of those spaces even A 8 S i IV, though the proponents identified they don't need that many parking spaces. Commissioners Fischer and Forrest agreed with that addition. Chair Lonsbury asked the Commission if they feel their input is needed with regard to landscaping, especially along the Crosstown Highway. Commissioners indicated they were comfortable with the plans as presented. Chair Lonsbury noted the applicant appears to have brought an exterior building materials board and asked the applicants if they would show the materials to the Commission. Mr. Hansen presented the Commission their exterior materials board; highlighting the louvers that will be constructed in the ramp. Mr. Hansen acknowledged that at this time they haven't settled. on the exact louver that would be used in the ramp. Ayes; Risser, Schroeder, Fischer, Forrest, Lonsbury. Nay Staunton. Abstain, Brown. Motion carried. S-08 -4 PreliminaV Plat Westin Gal ria 3510 Gallerid\ Staff Presentation: Planner Teague informed the Com 'ssi the applicant is proposing a plat for the final development plan for the ^nge's ro that was approved by the City Council on March 6, 2006. The plat simacts for the various uses, and elevations within the project. No )c e proposed from t he originally approved plans. Planner Teague told the C mission the prop sed plat is the same as was approved for the Haugla project at 50th and nce. That property was also platted after it was buil o establish precise lot lin s. Planner Teague con uded that staff recommends th the City Council give preliminary approv to the Registered Land Survey, d e stamped June 30, 2008 subject to a following condition: 1. T7reive must approve the final plat within one year o reliminary approval o a written application for a time extension or a preliminary a l will be void. A'-8o 9 1. _. REPORTMECOMMEN VATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item II. C. Consent From: Cary Teague Planning Director Information Only Date: August 19, 2008 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Preliminary Plat of the Westin Hotel and condominiums for Action ® Motion Gabbert and Beck at 3501 Galleria. (See location on ❑ Resolution pages Al -A3.) Ordinance Deadline for a city decision: October 21, 2008 F-1 Discussion Planning Commission Recommendation On a 7 -0 vote, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the request. (See minutes on page A17.) Staff Recommended Action Approve the preliminary plat. Introduction/Background The applicant is proposing a plat for the final development plan for the project that was approved by the City Council on March 6, 2006. The plat simply creates tracts for the various uses, and elevations within the project. (See proposed tracts on pages A6 -A14.) No changes are proposed from the originally approved plans. (See original plans on pages A15- A16a.) The proposed plat is the same as was approved for the Haugland project at 50th and France. That property was also platted after it was build to establish precise lot lines. Primary Issue • Is the proposed subdivision reasonable for this site? Yes. The applicant is simply platting individual tracts for the already approved development plans, so that individual uses have their own tract. Again, there are no changes proposed to the original plans. Staff Recommendation Recommend that the city council give preliminary approval to the Registered Land Survey, date stamped June 30, 2008. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. The city must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. 2 City of Edina MOMM 'Al City UmIt. Parks Ing Will ���ii■ iry��`� ►� = M91 1111 ••:...■ .- .�.. r-- Man .. an mm ✓� Mill CIL v L7 • IF r 1 r.- � aw • �� rTtrn 1�1r Farlrl FI n / III !_ � � I H'► I N a f r f r" M -rMN .Pr • I r �' H 1 i � � 6917 =¢f r1�'tl IrtI1fI ! • bt 'rTt N4 s r I r E r RI R "ILA, ,l •Ir.ii i I, r 1 t _ r f • - - r i "h' rTiln Tom I r rI f,p I. fll E� 197 - - i� hM1I�erTtfKb'Irr' t IN R / If NNh 4 4 /rIHIIN MEN r trrHf t fk�r/II Fyi�I`rIN INnt r IIIrq,�MUirI NIf �_ $w° rMrc � p ♦F * ., MlfM/ll ` 1�... 70TH ST W ' r t*r ,h M. b{ f rr.Mrr..riw✓v • t If Ka �,� a `.:tom.. .: e•; � , f (� I r rri/r/ �, lAI4 I I 1^ S R y ._ �.. s. a yam. ret� ' • f �� , t F,ty ti5 y 7101, G 6: 7 ' _. . r ...� ..... -. - '` aaPB as Za r` •�t :,.- �.�.k<MS cm. -y�:c _•r..rsc.�svn . o , nn j is in +3 City of Edina 6704 6705 — 6705 f0' 00 676 a Legend 6708 67,3 67a 6709 t 6725 -1701 /6DUSe Number Labels 6712 6)776716 Stmet Name Labolc 6717 6700 6800 6001 800 6, B�7 . / Limits 6804 6801 6805 680/. 6�5 )SS 6775 CMOs BBOS 6909 'i 6809 Lake Nemec 6813 6900 6817 6904 ' '6817 sna Lakes 6908 6901 682! 6912 Parfet 6978 6903 6906 6829 V ♦ 1♦ 8905 6007 Zoning 68 8901 '- � 691309 6908 8901'.8885 ® /.PD tAulwnaam Pn�p 0mr.�i 6977 0921 6911 6905 OWD 8905 6B1fi 7100 8823 ❑ MDDiiNmP.+Dawbpmen: Omra 4l 6823 6909 6B(N ('913 ■ MDD6IN� Dmabcnnm O V.o -SI -- 0920 6911 69136908 8'917- . 6917 6912 6921, 6028 69216916 6925, 7676 7805_ /BW 6177 ® ❑ NDDi1N�nm Dswaanvn: 0-41 ►a1 1 6929662/ 8929 .6937: 71.07 ■ PCD,IWnnm Conorerra:O VrC•11 `r - J "'` 6950 ♦818 42101 094 y - -� - -- .6976 6Wb PCD3 {Plsnnm GPnnfmoNDmrra -2I 70108896 717 ® P1:DslPlmnm GPmmcro�lOmrC]I _1700�yi ® PCDalPennpcnn,n,�,:am.a +, u0} 70017000 70077000 700 180/ 7000 70037601700570.011005 D 70087005 700B700d �Oif 23 I I ❑ ❑ Pm lPm,nm bene,wlDm POD IIPOnnm OH D:n.c1-Ii .'j 7001- 330YJ50f )� 7001 : POD- 2IP- :.Mf —DRn_ 21 200.. 70f770f2 70137011 70� 7010 21 PRD -1 (Pmnnm Ruem:oRl.a11 7101 7016 70177076 70191000 71057100 _ 7102 71.077706 7766 17701 'bD1 7113710( 71037101 I /� 7110 7 7650 7107 I -_ ❑ vtxD elPOnnm Resaan� Dmm31 PRD ]IPbnnm RmtleM Dm.v 31 PRD-a lPVnnec Resnm,t Dm=c I 71177108 71097106 11 767 PRD -5IP Dm RmmantOmm9l 71217112 71117112 71257116 71177110 7!'87 ■ !K5•c lPUnnm 9'aaRec�enaP11 71297120 71217110 71217120 178 WS - }i} I/ }l1 an;tepfe D.alnnp une 0a.n11 71137124 71237171 712b 7124 ® •i LwDnp RlDwek unlDmrC� 71777128 71287126 7126712 0 0 71077100 7201 M00, 7201720. 24 0 p ❑ Pamels 7205 7201 7205 71D1. 7105 7286 7209.77208 7� 6 200 -7201 72f� 7175 7701 71.01 Ili 7ui 3 71 7103 ,Of6711,77 7I ro-ewn P,.. )� /O/I�fTtSp�7/! 1 711f 0 )111 �pp2 `190��y70JI n �,000 nJs 7719 6 LI 74 11 a'o1i'onllp9' stt »3s .7721 7750 IH7 805 ♦02 517 77� • 1 Ye�1�21 �' 52172/771'- 7760 7177 •''1,06',00 m 315 14077!00 ♦20D 0 .. � � - V vp �' 7405 7101 .<,aau cm..a.lcwosas r4a i ,l'� 'WWII v _ PID: 2902824340023 Qt>r p 1 ~ 3201 Galleria I[ 7 N a � Edina, MN 55435 +3 �L1 PAMATIVC URS June 27, 2008 Mr. Cary Teague, Planning Director City of Edina Planning Department 4801 West 50t''Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Three — Dimensional Registered Land Survey Application Westin Edina Galleria Hotel &Residences - TRACT A, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1774 Edina, Minnesota Dear Mr. Teague: Attached herewith are a completed SUBDIVISION APPLICATION, APPLICATION FEE and support materials for a three - dimensional Registered Land Survey (RLS) of the above - referenced property. As we discussed on Tuesday, June 24, 2008, we have included only those materials for the subdivision itself, as the City Council has previously granted site development approvals in March of 2006. The applicants /owner's request for subdivision approval is consistent with previously approved concept for both hotel and residential condominium uses of the property. The proposed RLS subdivides the property into spaces for hotel uses and spaces that will subsequently become Common Interest Community Number 1732- The Galleria Residences. Joint usage of the facility is supported by Two and Three Dimensional Reciprocal Easement, Operation, Use and Maintenance Agreements. Attached are the following materials: ➢ Completed and Signed SUBDIVISION APPLICATION. ➢ APPLICATION FEE in the amount of $950 - Note that the check is for $50 more than required as it was determined after the.check was prepared.to combine two of the tracts into a single tract. The RLS will create 6 unique tracts. Please apply the overage of $50 to City of costs for preparation of the property owners lists required for the Planning Commission Public Hearing. ➢ Three Full Size Copies of the, RLS, a CD containing pdf files of the ten sheets comprising the RLS and 30 11 X 17 copies of RLS. ➢ A hard copy and CD containing the legal description of the property being subdivided. ➢ A Land Surveyor's Certification of entire tract coverage and there being no gaps or overlaps with adjoining lands. ➢ A Title Insurance Policy with copies of "Schedule B -1 Exception Documents" and a draft copy of the Three Dimensional Reciprocal Easement Agreement recited above. 77iresher Square • 700 Third Street South • Suite 600 • MinneaOhs, MN 55415 • Phone: (612) 370 -0700 • Fax: (612) 3 70-13 78 L ii 'D�;� Mr. Cary Teague, Planning Director June 27, 2008 Page 2 ➢ Also enclosed is an 8.5 X 11 graphic exhibit showing an annotated elevation view of the subdivision showing the tract designations and descriptions which should be helpful in understanding how the various tracts and elements relate. If additional materials or explanations are required for this application please contact me. Based upon the date of this submittal we understand that the RLS should be before Planning Commission for approval on July 30, 2008 and before the City Council on August 19, 2008. Thank you for consideration of and assistance with this application Respectfully Submitted, URS Corporation Keith E. Dahl, P.L.S. Vice President ATTACHMENTS Cc: Warren Beck/Galleria Hotel, LLC w /application materials Eric Anderson/Ryan Companies US, Inc. w /application materials Charles Ferrell/Faegre & Benson w /application materials File: 31810487.01001 k7 �I ^— alel.ur au en� 0o 0 \ N Co J Q G m Z 0 U U L� Q ry 0 vr1 REGISTERED LAND SURVEY N0. 1949 ear c—., de4 1 havaaaemaed yd the ldl p g d embed preperly� al d h the C..ly el H.nneph and Stole of YMneeate to wit TRACT A. REGSIEIED LAND SURVEY N 1714, H—Wk, Cwvly. M- tale. I hereby prtlfy that MI. Reyl.tw.d Land Survey Is a comet reprea�lallul at he pmpnly dwvEd h�aon; Uvl IMe R.plet.rd Land Survey em pr. a ra µ rlomw�i of u.'Stut: of .a n... and that I am a duly Llcm.ad Land aria un Y9mes.la. oatd hB __ day of 2ao9. Yhn..ata Lkena. HN o L.-d SuMrn CITY OF EOMA. MWESOTA hb Re9fet d Lwd Survey eae appra.d and aacepld by Ma CRy C-1 of Edh% Yeme.ala at a rapdn meeonp hdd Ml. _ day of 20M Maya, TAWAYER SERVICES OEPMMENT. Hwneph Coanly. YMnoa.la I heeeby cartlfy Mal lace papMo In 200_ and Pdn yen. have be" paid far the land deavl . w MY Re9letad Lord Survey. Dated IhY __ day of 2OD8. AR L Nvendn. NnvePh Cwnty A.dltn Deputy SURVEY UMS10H. Hennepin Cwnty, uhn.mla Pona..nl Iv Yeme.ola Sletaln Saelbn 3878.585 (1969). Ude Reghtn.d Land Survey ha. been appra..d M1. __ day of 2008. W,_ P. or._. H.nngh C..ty Su_yar REGISTRAR a NTLES. Hwnw% Caanly Yhnnota 1 hereby cerUlr that Ihhe RpM.rad Land Snwy Ro. eas Md h hb .Me MM1 _ day .I 2008, at dd.dr Nlh.d H. C.-Ill, R.9letar If D.poly JAN I= SHEET 1 OF 10 SHEETS -:I 00 0 m D Uy REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. - um SHEET 2 OF 10 SHEETS ::1E.:;? ..TREE ------ 9ENCHMAM mm 589'48'54"W 442— F ------------- ------- --------- J.. 40 20 0 40 cc SCALE IN FEE-r Z_ DENO'ES rom 5/8 INM REBAR NTH CAP NO. 18418 0 MWTES SET Pk NAIL TRACT A SEE SHEETS LLJ 3-10 OF 10 SHEETS FOR MACT LOCAMN -11 DETMI f n: cr o 0! ow Z • 404.88 EAST um SHEET 2 OF 10 SHEETS 00 IN 69TH T ELEVATIONS ARE RgoEHM TO A BENCIIIIARK S"Ol" ON SHEET 2 OF 10 SHEETS TRACT A LIES BELOTI ELEVATION 'Moo FEET 2: a. so 15 0 30 URS. SHEET 3 OF 10 SHEETS ry n 69TH T ELEVATIONS ARE RgoEHM TO A BENCIIIIARK S"Ol" ON SHEET 2 OF 10 SHEETS TRACT A LIES BELOTI ELEVATION 'Moo FEET 2: a. so 15 0 30 URS. SHEET 3 OF 10 SHEETS co 0 m D :D 0 0 --I REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. E T -TREET S89'495CW 441 I �gi 1 TRACT F 56i zv .--- -01 .......... TRACT C IMP TRACT C jaw., WX TRACT B -------------------- HUE- ------------------ MPLEW EaT 30 30 ELEVATIONS ARE REFfRENCED TO A IMENICEMARK SNOW! ON INEET 2 Or 10 94EEM P! SCALE IN FEET THIS PORTION OF TRACT 9 LACE BETWEEN ELEVATIONS M.00 ". AND BBEAM R. THIS PORTION OF TRACT C LIM BETIMEN ELEVATIONS 70-00 fl. W 889.20 R. um TESS PORTION OF TRACT F 1.113 ". AND 020 EXCEPT AS=MU%A=9"VjMMW0O SHEET 4 OF 10 SHEETS 8 REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. is %E.c ;T TH STREET .1. Ci [1J • ED ltJ � -1 .y cc 1. 1] IJ L2. ;.7 30 19;._0 70 scup w r[er _..EET 5 OF .10 SHEETS 00 0 r- C14 11-1 Qc) m D U) Z :D 0 LL fy LL r') REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. ST E- T 69TH FE E T z . - - - - - TRACT F TRACT F -------------------------------------------------- EAST Imm BHaT a of MAraNg ARE REFERENCED TO A BERCMARK 9MM ON MW 2 Of 10 SHEETS TICS PCRTMN OF TRACT 0 UES BETWEEN DAVATIONS SM25 FT. AND 000.23 M THIS PORTION OF TRACT C LIES BETWEEN ELEVATIONS aS025 FT. AND 900.23 rr. IM popTMN 6 1RACT F UES BETWEEN ELEVATIONS 880.25 FT AND 000.23 Fr. c: ta LtJ o Er Ly 3D 15 0 30 SCAJE IN MT SHEET 6 OF 10 SHEETS ----------- - -- "ACT C ,4 �:.,--TRACT C TRACT C TRACT B z, " " TRACT I I". C I /.( A a .. - o z J, TRACT F EAST Imm BHaT a of MAraNg ARE REFERENCED TO A BERCMARK 9MM ON MW 2 Of 10 SHEETS TICS PCRTMN OF TRACT 0 UES BETWEEN DAVATIONS SM25 FT. AND 000.23 M THIS PORTION OF TRACT C LIES BETWEEN ELEVATIONS aS025 FT. AND 900.23 rr. IM popTMN 6 1RACT F UES BETWEEN ELEVATIONS 880.25 FT AND 000.23 Fr. c: ta LtJ o Er Ly 3D 15 0 30 SCAJE IN MT SHEET 6 OF 10 SHEETS REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. ` co .TEST ti-TH TE:E.E =? N Se9aa4z. e W " Cp ; J Q TRACT F t, z^ i r: CECw _ _ m E.1 (n� , s - .. - TFim: —, Ei Y R e TRACT C U �`� $ �" wmuEUiEn1 J cl tI - Riod.•let C1. A . / 1 �/ Xn14YW E EAg _______________ _____111- L2------------ ....... ZIP 5 EL itr - . so�F..'w. e'.�rTltn - .. B .- °6 9Eeo'o -[ r TOUM .. N LQL saomu It 4EAST EAST . - ' -- - 70 IS 0 30 SCALE M FEET . ELEVATIONS ARE REFEIMNCED 10 A BENCHMARK SHOW ON SHEET 2 OF 10 SHEETS - - .. - INS PORTION or TRACT C LIES BETWEEN ELEVATIONS 000.23 FT. AND 550.17 F7. ' THIS PORTION OF TRACT F LIES RETGEEN ELEVATIONS 000.23 FT. AND 880.17 F7. - ' SHEET 7 OF 10 SHEETS 00 0 C14 m D cl) z :D 0 C) d F-- LL. -1 REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. E: T 69TH STREET S89•48'aW'W 442.68 TRACT F I 041 ------------- I. •••' -------------- 001[ S— 7 17 10 WIXTIC - ----------------------- I TRACT D 1- y ---------------------- Y z LO TRACT -- -TRACT C •- ----------- - - - - -- -1111 --------- -(m — ---- - -------- 5 z j -------------------- .. L ........ P- aA' 404.33 EAST tttggq ELEvATRM ARE REFERENCED TO A BENCHMARK SHOW ON MEET 2 OF 10 MEETS SO 15 0 30 SCALE IN FEET THIS PORTION OF TRACT C UES BETWEEN ELEVATIONS 980117 R. AND 075.00 R. INTS PORTION OF TRACT 0 UES BETWEEN ELEVATIONS 990.17 R. AND 1002.02 R. nos PORTION OF TRACT r uEs BETWEEN E"A=m 960-17 R. AND 1099.9E R. SHEET 8 OF 10 SHEETS 00 0 N �11 (c) Cf) 0 C) 69TH STREET EAST ELEVATIONS ARE MUIENCED To A UDWMARK 94OWN ON SHEET 2 OF 10 SHEETS mAcy E LES AWK ELEVATION 1085.97 R. TI#q pORIM OF TRACT r Lin ABOVE ELEVATION 1089.02 FT. iii r a 30 15 0 30 1 SOPIE W FEET lum MEET 9 OF 10 SHEETS 00 0 m U) 0 C) Nll C) LL c) ml --- — — ] ELEVATION DETAIL NOT DRAWN TO SCALE B"ATION TRACT E ------------ ------- ---------------------------- TRACT D LL LL 0!0.17 Ft -------------------- ---------- -------- u K TRACT C MD.23 ".— ---------------- ----------- -------- ------------------------------------------------------------ M.2B rr -------------------- --------------------- -- --------- - -- — - ------- ------ .... TRACT B ------------------- - 677.22 FT - ---------- -------- TRACT DID aszo rr -------------------- ---- ---------- I ---- — ----- 0-- --- ------- ------- ------------------------ ------- --------- u L) .:3G M :---------- ---- - -- ------ ----------------- TRACT B M.W FY - ------ - ------- TRACT A ELEVAn" ARE RUUtENCM M A Mt"ARK SHGM ON 9*ET 2 OF ID WffM TKS orrAIL BM NOT pwoRT M W= ALL HMUZONTAL RELATICNgW& um SHEET 10 OF 10 SHEETS d an ■;a ra s� ti r■ 1� I -; GalleriaL�.= =a=a 1 o PF�9I■IIE i uwr ti3 sTRE l i •1. . �7 L 69th - Street n in u■B La � Will I I 1 7 I! C CD Q Yfl O 30 December 2005 Gabbert & Beck IRYAN� elness Swenson graham architects inc. 70th.Street _ LANDSCAPE NOTES • IAIrGiECBVeNCIwi BMLL.I®E�fTEr1EAlID®COIE FAIpYYIBRIB F]MIwDCOfIWR8, TIABSVEBEfAl1■L OaBRalTEAAIB DIIaY1 F1E1dn8 ABPIAYf YAIEIaV.rBHIfM®1BrB1BE A0>�Imlal ®MP1�VK0 AIL�LL EI.IIBDC8t0CV]VB BawiDIDroTEMTIBEA10dOPE�1.wK �Irl1�i YPIIFDror1� •�cN�w ar1XE 1MOrJ6EAROQfgfmrla'. CaiRACId1fPW .at ®nAIDBro mlFnn T* UTKMLNVWA m11E rBYmIO16m "'m m • IAaDQ•dPEL08RAR0181WivEREVPWI Uraur Alm DBemIVBBIOw AAB rr■ronFArlBii> Wi LA mrAPEARcmn=00�w09r.m Ow LOJIDBrWLC39n=BOE1A1 �HfIrC1CNNO NOIFYW®GfEARpaIECfa 91YE . A6i4•IIBfIBwIDGTIOYfFf.�1!wFD PIAMfIrrBaMY raYEI�r Mm WYCOIRII�TE OFHIwI WEFtBR6TELAmIR. • Im RAIInYrLLBE waWl ®YI�RFCMLC01A�r111D�frICMI1W EEH1 M® WmCJVEARCH" .rBWWNVI PMMW ADABnEWW FLvm BBB • LANCG SW8MCIWMILLLII®DO:mPILKf IrM�CCM CpEIEtEDWT MEDWEMEA AIIVf WtEBULrMLL BE FBD88ED 18OI.NfAWTw1 W111Q�Bw @IFR LpY AI.1�IaVE1prOTFrfJaIA hLvvo"nuppuEm BWAFEMDOTU D MCQ®nlUXI 1106F8FYOIm OIIEIaIE OfiE31 APPMOYFD fHffY�llr ®r�111XTERAM1aORPHiTE gHA�; • LAN =1 CDMtP CtMt PfmfCiT�V4M=CIBB&OUrrE L MBEAEBOOArII {NVEDrBEAL4E Fw®EDOaC� ?b'mr1MLE1@DT WANUFA TUFO X 1fOB�BBYMWATMF=aumkmMZFML W1 1I1� lIPN8r1EF11AlB®AIB BILE HF]E/IIB pflBMCRABOCIpiCPFA9Cl6 r3D ILWMEELYAr WTPACOUWCLMM =rAUC= Pgi BBBBMr4U FURMM AS"6ffIU=PMIVTE IAm nAIEADEro WErW1BEBBAiEDAT1A ]AOCIIb4LLCCBfmIIB wM®L . B=aB WL PNW18mTECC1/IWBAMIDWLIM WACBBED my Ana dY B181F88IHPEi1TMN>n CRwoR41A0E8WAtE8.rm rwLE BfAnEDB@.71f�Y. PL- TMMMUPJM VMGMMCDnXPElE1M"#JM1r8MVM IMP VL90 • tA1r0= VFWl fBACt�IrWLYO�YAL l�BB1fA1®IOCIfIGY6 IBB�DO AMDMV]VE 88ADE UTW8 AND R WTE IECEBBAPP ®IBCl/lf TIE wmPwED PIMRIwlE18ALBIMICCIIFL(.B Tomx. CENEA1rBMWff1TCEPfX�P IABfwB�WOBIBCOFYPMRB mPBCLNPAiiltri� ®fFYPOSf A/81 tBFMnBBN6 INCIL PBDfE=MFO71811EBEF(MCO BICIB PB=MIWCAEABAN= ZELLRLE M@r•11IRMMtalFdi■B ATLEACNCAM LWGPE QIED CT®ilYlF DFSB1Al ■BIEBrBBW11MVEArIFaBIBCJVFB 1BOXf. wBAPPwOY41EWAL REL'CIWWMPRYEIMIHEPFFIBTwEAl •FALL • IAI®GPECaE1DACEWr41LLC00®IAYETE PXA'E86CWlt■Cid AMD 8"LB QOIYFrfAtll�DrWl.MI!E AIDYCIOIBFETANDDDUW r ClaO CAIEBIrWWTET� ®OWB}TFGIPLWOM 8Y.tEM1Y.YBOEf CnnHF PAf9lWNFACiYBFDFCNTOPIWI NIIMCEC0101BTEB �n wMrtor BBrwAtnErml CeEA COIDEACItlBYA4 .■BCYrI! IDIEBTW/f FEET A®NE TE RDOt MIL Bi84T AIB 11EFB ■uLL BEDw■11111OIAEDEDlOWF1n11Ma BAmJE PAVED rAFACE PIAMn ®rTEFYL PMBBroG®BBit AIO ¢]OIIENBM4BGAFIEY WYf. TEI • UMERGRM= VI¢llMCFA EIBfALLI�®rMitIFMCI ®CC IOr OUT TBCIWII t10Ot BTelE lr ?AM1'ElfrfBM TEIDmiffIMK j /•jI/ ` \^ 30 December 2005 Gabbert & Beck IRYAN� elness Swenson graham architects inc. - __ Illlin,ll� _ - P, e 1 1 t s Iona �. _ "`., r � .,.:,•`. �, .;� i�i���Igri � }IM �`� G'II!•Iliiif� _`1 _ —_ _ �` __ _ -._ —. _ _ � ��_ t- .. � ,,.rte ;�:� �.:;.""' 6 ? iG t. ` '41In Gill'!•'' li i- � , ji.► _ 1 - �r'JV° ^,., wb* 4 _. U92-iMIL —doom r, 4e cz op Minute Summary PC Meeting July 30, 2008 S -08-4 Preliminary Plat Westin Galleria 3510 Galleria Staff Presentation: Planner Teague informed the Commission the applicant is proposing a plat for the final development plan for the project that was approved by the City Council on March 6, 2006. The plat simply creates tracts "for the various uses, and elevations within the project. No changes are proposed from the originally approved plans. Planner Teague told the Commission the proposed plat is the same as was approved for the Haugland project at 5V' and France. That property was also platted after it was build to establish precise lot lines. Planner Teague concluded that staff recommends that the City Council give preliminary approval to the Registered Land Survey, date stamped June 30, 2008 subject to the following condition: 1. The city must approve the final plat within one year of preliminary approval or receive a written application for a time extension or the preliminary approval will be void. Commission Action: Commissioner Fischer moved to recommend Preliminary Plat approval subject to staff conditions. Commissioner Brown seconded the motion. All voted aye; motion carried. 417 rro4he� 4 �v CORPORA'° ,BBB AGENDA ITEM: H. D. Commercial Photography Permit Continued to 9 -2 -08. No packet data F-1 Oral presentation F-] Information coming 9 o e \�� 0 • rN • \ 18B8 � lase REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Agenda Item ILE MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: Heather Worthington Consent Asst. City Manager 0 Information Only Wayne Houle Public Works Director and City Engineer Date: August 19, 2008 Mgr. Recommends To HRA Subject: Public Works Relocation ® Motion Public Hearing � Resolution F� Ordinance Discussion INFORMATION /BACKGROUND: The City Council requested a public hearing this evening on the relocation of the Public Works facility from the current location on Eden Avenue, to the proposed location at 7450 Metro Boulevard, prior to further action by the Council on this project. At the conclusion of the hearing, staff recommends that the Council authorize preparation of a purchase agreement for 7450 Metro Blvd. History of Edina Public Works: Edina Public Works relocated to the existing site in 1963 from our previous site (now the Edina Public Schools Bus Garage). The existing building is undersized for our modern operations, and lacks segregation in work spaces. In particular, the building lacks a separate shop space where the mechanics can service and repair the City's fleet of approximately 250 vehicles. The building lacks sufficient indoor storage for our plow fleet, which results in a lack of efficiency in plowing operations where employees must move equipment to access plows, and take attachments from other spaces because the garage is not large enough to leave I attachments on the vehicles. The mechanic's work space has significant health and safety issues due to access for vehicles driving through their space, and a lack of sufficient air handling and subsequent build -up of diesel fumes. In short, the current facility does not meet the needs of our staff in providing the high quality services that the residents of Edina have come to expect. Finally, the building itself is very energy inefficient, which results in a burdensome financial outlay to heat and cool the space. The City Council made it a goal to relocate the Public Works site by including a new facility in the 5 -year Capital Improvement Plan. The relocation of the facility had to be to an industrially zoned site. Staff started looking at sites as they became available in the Edina Interchange Area which is properly zoned and located. Sites that staff has analyzed include the following: Sites analyzed between 2001 and 2007 2 Review No Site Year Analyzed Address Building Name Summary 1 7101 Amundson Olympic Electric 2001 Too small 2 5400 Dewey Hill Road Edina Distribution / Best Buy 2003 No outsides ace 3 7250 Bush Lake Road Midwest Tennis Club 2005 Too small 4 5309 70th Street West NSP Xcel Site 2005 Not willing to relocate 5 7600 Metro GM Site 2005 No outsides ace 6 7215 Cahill Road Gabbert Warehouse 2007 Too small 7 7450 Metro Boulevard ConAgra Building 2007/ 2008 Meets needs 8 5146 Eden Ave. Existing Public Works 1990's to 2008 Too small- - inefficient The proposed relocation site at 7450 Metro Blvd. (ConAgra Foods), is a suitable site. The access to the site off of Hwy. 100 makes it a good centrally located site, and it is similarly sited, in terms of logistics, to the existing facility. This is a very similar location, as the current site is north- centrally located, and the proposed site is south - centrally located. The proposed site is also more convenient to the cold storage building where seasonal equipment is stored (near Braemar Golf Course). It has good access to the main roadways such as W. 70tH W 77tH and W. 78th, which connect the east and west sides of the City. The building is large enough to house our plow fleet with attachments. An existing cold- storage /freezer room can be repurposed as a mechanics shop with necessary air handling. The office space is large enough to accommodate our Public Works staff and our Engineering Department. The acquisition of this site will add approximately 3.69 acres of land to the City's stock of publicly owned land. This building will also allow the City to make investments in energy efficiency and green technologies. The proposed relocation would include moving the Engineering Department from City Hall to the new facility, since Engineering is an integral part of Public Works operations and project management. The two departments are now separated, and the move would improve efficiency through coordinating information, services, and technology. This would also free up parking at City Hall where parking is at a premium. A "shared desk" would be maintained at City Hall for plan review purposes (similar to the current arrangement with the Fire Department). History of earlier efforts: Following a September 2007 study session, the City Council directed staff to seek RFPs for the redevelopment of the current Public Works site. On October 12, 2007, staff received two proposals for the relocation and redevelopment of the Edina Public Works Facility. The two proposals were from Opus and Ryan Companies. Opus proposed a relocation of the Public Works facility to the current Con Agra Foods site at 7450 Metro Drive, in the Edina Interchange Center. Ryan Companies proposed the Gabberts 3 warehouse site, located at 7215 Cahill Road. Staff determined that the Gabberts warehouse site did not meet the minimum requirements for size of the facility, and it was located too close to residential land uses. Based on this, the Council accepted the Opus proposal, and directed staff to develop schematics for the ConAgra Building. Con Agra Property: After the Eden Avenue redevelopment proposal with Opus was withdrawn by the applicant the relocation of the Public Works facility and the redevelopment of the existing facility site were "de- coupled ". Since the Metro Blvd. site was suitable for the Public Works facility, staff suggested that the City try to acquire the property independent of any redevelopment of the existing Public Works facility site. Staff began the process of negotiating with Opus and Con Agra for purchase of the Con Agra property. Opus had a purchase agreement with Con Agra for $9.25 Million that ran through mid -June. When that purchase agreement lapsed, the City began discussions with Con Agra about acquiring the property. In late July, after receiving authorization from the City Council to negotiate a non - binding term sheet with Con Agra, city staff negotiated an $8 Million purchase price with Con Agra. The details of the term sheet are included as an attachment to this report. Public Works Relocation Overview: Attached is a schematic floor plan layout of the proposed renovation of the ConAgra building, as well as an elevation drawing of the building as renovated. These costs will cover: • Replacement of roof • Replacement of concrete floor in warehouse space to accommodate weight of tandem and other heavy vehicles for indoor storage • Complete remodeling of offices • Remodeling of cold storage space to accommodate the mechanics shop • Adding a salt storage building outside in the parking lot • Adding a wash bay that can accommodate city vehicles and school district buses in the future • Adding a fuel island that can accommodate city vehicles and school district buses in the future • Incorporating a storm water management plan to accommodate Nine Mile Creek Watershed District regulations • Will include fiber optic connection to all other city -owned facilities, completing the citywide "loop ". • Will include female locker rooms (current facility does not have separate rooms) • Will accommodate alternate commuting modes (locker facilities, bike racks, shower) 4 Bond Issue: Staff estimates that renovation of the building will cost approximately $14 Million; acquisition - - -will total $8 Million, for a total project cost of $22 Million. Staff proposes to issue $14 Million in G.O. Bonds, with the balance of $8 Million in Lease Revenue bonds. This arrangement will allow flexibility in future refinancing of the debt. There is an advantage to issuing the debt in 2009, because two TIF districts will decertify next year, adding those properties back into the City's tax base: • The 2009 impact on a median value home in Edina will be approximately $23. For a Commercial /Industrial property valued at $1,000,000, the impact will be approximately $66. • The 2010 impact on a median value home will be approximately $46. For a median value C/I property, approximately $132. The difference between the two years has to . do with the timing of the TIF district decertification, and the payment from Hennepin County to the City as part of the second -half 2009 tax settlement. Without the TIF district decertification, the tax impact would be $82 on a median -value home, and $233 on a median value C/I property. Alternative: Staff has analyzed the possibility of using the existing site to construct a new facility. J.E. Dunn and Oertel and Associates prepared a rough estimate of the cost, as well as a schematic design for this alternative. Our architect found that this analysis was very difficult compared to the proposed site at 7450 Metro Blvd. The general concept for the existing site would be to construct a parking structure at the north end of the site for general public and employee parking; construct two additional stories on top of the north end of the building to accommodate the administrative offices and employee functions such as locker rooms and lunch rooms; and move the fuel island to the southeast corner of the site (fuel cannot be located underneath a parking structure). The construction costs for this renovation are estimated at $14,849,400. Attachments: • Term Sheet for 7450 Metro Blvd. • Schematic drawing of the alternative plan • J.E. Dunn estimate for renovation of existing site • Schematic drawing of the ConAgra site - -floor plan • Schematic drawing of the ConAgra site -- elevation • Schematic design estimate of ConAgra site • Tax impact on median value residential and commercial /industrial land • Bond analysis • Schedule of events 5 CoFAg &- — Sent Via E-Mail and UPS Overnight Mail' CofiAgri Fh6ds' 'One GmAgra Drive. 1 - 190 Oninhii, NF.168102 11:1.: (402) 59%-5232 FAX: -401 910-3317 ji m. Lit iYI c(fllcon agriaf;)uds. c o n) James G. DoNic I 'ire lIrrsidon July 28, 2008 Mr. Gordon Hughes City Manager Edina City Hall 4801 W. 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Re: 7450 Metro Boulevard, Edina, Minnesota ConAgra Dear Mr. Hughes: We are pleased to submit the following proposal for the sale of the ConAgra Foods property located at 7450 Metro Boulevard in Edina, Minnesota. I believe we have incorporated your changes per your letter of July 24, 2008. P . rovided'the following basic terms and conditions are acceptable, we will incorporate them into a- purchase'Agr6ement (the, "Purchase Agreement") for review and execution by both parties. The following represent the basic points of the agreement: Buyer: City of Edina ("City") Seller: ConAgra Foods Packaged Foods, LLC ("ConAgra") Property: 7450 Metro Boulevard, which is improved with an existing building, together With all related appurtenances and improvements related- thereto. Purchase Price: $8,000f000 Earnest Money: The City will deposit $100,000 (which amount, including interest earned thereon, less investment fees.related thereto, is referred to as the "Earnest Money") into an interest-bearing escrow account with First American Title Insurance Company (the "Title Company") within 2 business days following execution of the Purchase. Agreement. The Earnest Money will be refundable if the Purchase Agreement is terminated by the City during the Due Diligence Period (described below). The Earnest Money will become non - refundable following the due diligence period, unless the transaction fails to close by reason of ConAgra's default. Due Diligence Period: ConAgra agrees to deliver to the City all documents and other materials reasonably requested by the City and in ConAgra's possession and control within ten days after execution of this letter of intent so as to permit the City to commence review in a timely fashion. Delivery of documents and materials shall be subject to a mutually- agreeable confidentiality agreement covering the documents and materials. Provided that the aforementioned documents and materials are delivered to the City, the City will have 30 days following execution of the Purchase Agreement to complete its due diligence, satisfying itself that all conditions related to the properly are acceptable to the City including but not limited to title, survey, environmental, soil, engineering and utilities. ( "Due Diligence Period ") ConAgra will furnish the City an ALTA title commitment issued by the Title Company for the Property and deliver the commitment within 5 days after executing the purchase agreement. ConAgra shall pay the cost of the standard ALTA title policy. The City shall pay the cost of any endorsements to the title policy. Access to Property: Following execution of this letter of intent and upon two days prior request by the City, ConAgra shall allow the City reasonable access to the Property to complete all necessary inspections and due diligence. Notwithstanding the forgoing sentence, the City shall not perform any sampling or destructive testing on or about the Property without the prior written consent of ConAgra, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Prior to entry, the City shall provide ConAgra with insurance certificates evidencing minimum limits of $1,000,000 of general commercial liability insurance for the City and /or any agents of the City that wish to enter the Property. If the City is not satisfied with the Property at the end of the Due Diligence Period, then the City may terminate the Purchase Agreement and receive a refund of the Earnest Money. Closing Costs: Except as otherwise provided herein; real estate taxes and utility fees will be prorated as of the date of closing. ConAgra shall pay the state deed tax on the transfer. The City and ConAgra shall split the cost of any escrow and closing fees. Broker:- ConAgra and the City each represent that no real estate broker except PJ Morgan (representative of Seller) was in any way involved in this transaction. ConAgra will be responsible for payment of any sales commissions dui PJ Morgan pursuant to a separate agreement. Deed: ConAgra will convey.the Property to the City via a warranty deed. Environmental Remediation Costs: The parties agree that the Purchase Agreement will provide that the costs of remediating identified environmental conditions, including but not limited to obtaining a "no action" letter from the state of Minnesota will be borne by ConAgra. The parties agree that a no further action letter issued by the State of Minnesota shall satisfy ConAgra's obligation to remediate the Property. If the cost of remediation is reasonably estimated by ConAgra to exceed $100,000, then ConAgra'may terminate the Purchase Agreement by written notice. to the City. Schedule for City Consideration and Bond Sale: The purchase of the Property by the City will be funded through the issuance of general obligation bonds (the "Bonds "). The City will diligently work,to conduct public hearings and call for the issuance of the Bonds contemporaneous with the Due Diligence Period.. The City intends to pursue these hearing and issue the Bonds according to the following schedule; if the City does not'issue and sell the bonds by October 28, either ConAgra or City may terminate the purchase agreement, and the earnest money will be refunded to the City. The city shall promptly notify ConAgra in writing upon the City completing the sale of sufficient bonds to fund the purchase of the Property. August 4 • Present Letter of Intent to Council for approval August 19 Council Conducts public hearing on project • Council authorizes preparation of Purchase Agreement September 2 • Council Accepts Purchase Agreement • Council calls fro sale of the Bonds October 7 • Bond Sale October 24 • Bond proceeds available This.is a proposal for discussion purposes only and; not an offer to sell The undersigned parties shall not be legally bound by the terms hereof, unless and until the same are incorporated into a definitive purchase agreement which has been signed' by ConAgra and the City. If you desire to proceed to negotiate a Purchase Agreement based upon the foregoing understandings, :please sign the duplicate original of this letter in the place provided below and return it to ConAgra, at the address listed above. Upon receipt of a signed original of this letter from the City, ConAgra's counsel will prepare an initial draft of the Purchase Agreement. Yours very truly, G., Doyle Vice President Corporate Real Estate & Facilities Agreed and Accept by: City of Edina, Minnesota By: Its: Date: cc: P. J. Morgan Chris Aupperle Jack Rice .JE ounni® eonteraucTtoN August 13, 2008 Wayne Houle City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 ATLANTA I I CHARLOTTE COLORADO SPRINCS i DALLAS RE: EaISTING PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY RENOVATION DENVER EDINA, MN Wayne: DES MOINES JE Dunn was asked to provide an order of magnitude estimate to renovate the HOUSTON existing Edina Public Works building for the City of Edina. We received a concept sketch from Oertel Architects dated August 13, 2008. Using our historical cost database we derived the following order of magnitude estimate. The KANSAS `TTY estimate breakdown is as follows. a MINNEAPOLIS QQ Parking Deck $ 2,392,615 Provisions for Salt Building $ 500,000 _._. Relocate (2) Fuel Islands $ 357,300 -- -- -- -_ - - -- -- - - -- - — ._..._ MYRTLE BEACH New 2_Story Office Addition ! $ 6,912,000 Remodel Remaining Building $ 4,687,500 NASHVILLE Total Cost $ 14,849,415 Feel free to call with any questions, or comments. ORLANDO PHOENIX Sincerely, PORTLAND SFATTLF Stephen Brown Project Manager TOPEKA JE Dunn Construction n:,.cstimating \,c- pack`2OOR care group\edina public worWedina costing public works renovation.doc 9R55 W 7BTH STREET. SU11L 270, EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55344 1 TEL > 952.630 9000 1 FAX 952.830 1365 1 WWW.JEDtINN- NC.CUM d CIERTEL ARCHITECTS 91.P�o4M 1110f CITY OF EDINA PUBLIC WORKS EVfNk MN A —Y ZNCI� � 5 I� E � PLAN E m slTE� AUGUST 13, 2008 TRS Ao ' PATG I NATO+ IIC Lac OB-04 ADM • PPE mIAD -- ------- -- -- -- --- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- IAl s. II. Cm A—A ST. -L M.mp.l•SS1O5 ICI)6W5116 rd (01)w IN F. CLR AS NECE98M SITE PLAN AND SITE DETAILS rm+ mxl AFao., OM COY. arm AM GLITTER P. CIF .. Ed FM POINWO (AS NEC1EANT AT RIEL SAM) 1� Cam APRW GTE F®i ROY. ARM i• TALL mcRerc FM BUVD w me ''F 4'a •a tr - PA Ira Af�T'PU i}E PAW NM Ts7 14M .�. • }' zwzi � 'i' IV IIDI.� E)DBrE1G f.RLL ON k I mom t-0 (.6 EMIT =To Rim I 25 a'a 4 1 AT 7 at. E40 MAT) 4 2 FUELING ISLAND NBV RogICIR- up CI Oi mG1EfE. m ff mLLAID i• ROAD PANIFD mm amw Pm, Pak "In COME -INr. OO ALIRIAPI am w I r IDDNFICATEN SRm i 4 —ow AN ALL►YIPI SOI LLTrom AS I ®o BT ITS, y �. w cORFICATIOI STIM i - REAL LILT To STEEL TIRE ILTTRM AS RIM w SA' CAQW RAIM mT TO BTEFL TIRE wm RU p CI.l1 y1l, NR6I NA9� AW CAED 2' . 7 Y .RE 6rF8 TLRE 1170. INI i W9�. 1CIY mm IMTE!<TIOR I QAO! Q limK QI.FAQ Yda� 6rT$ TIRE q1Y W. ql w COC, i PAIR. Il10® wTBIfpR CAP LR ISL. METALS. b FAIL Wmr -I ftw. 7R7 tP TAT OF ORE I I I GRE B� 1 E I MMAW-40 m I�m1 m�• I I .lil MO r MGt �d 9 �rt.emlmL 0RE�' 0. I I : I N7I6 0.B MC I Rml1 ' 1 L :� � RMII R7l 1?A710R6 3 HANDICAP SIGN �.. 4 STOP SIGN = TYPICAL BOLLARD ELEVATION AT CURB 1 /2'•0.' -0' ELEVATION AT CURB 0./2 ".I' -0° ') SECTION DETAIL n OERTEL ARCHITECTS 74TH ST w WAVY VJ" OB-04 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS OCU.ENT WAS BY .1 - UNDER MRYEpRECTT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED ARCHITECT N THE STATE OF MINNESOTA DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PROGRESS SET (NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION) EDINA PUBLIC WORKS 7450 METRO BLVD., EDINA, MINNESOTA 55439 ®@ APRIL 17, 2008 TLES AIWA IAl s. II. Cm A—A ST. -L M.mp.l•SS1O5 ICI)6W5116 rd (01)w IN F. a JLD SITE PLAN AND SITE DETAILS rm+ mxl AFao., OM COY. arm AM GLITTER �a YIWC BILE sums (AS NEC1EANT AT RIEL SAM) 1� Cam APRW GTE F®i ROY. ARM ''F iIF i}E NM Ts7 14M .�. • }' zwzi � 'i' NEW FUEL IJB'I IR7lOR- E)DBrE1G f.RLL ON k I I 25 COY. AM= NBV RogICIR- OPBiABIL BD1P !: ISLAND IRM FENCE GRADE TO Mmom I I I I B 7 IM F GTE ASVSTBLT k :.r' TINS AREA • ` CLIm AND morGAGM E PARKING TOTALS: A NBR COL• 4 T' NOI OOY. Cm NFi°I P RFWO7® :.....: - .• a : GLITTER COIL SM 102 PW STALLS OAm AID 1®11 =NG no arms ma Is'a OON'7iLtE LIAR (f BiAR mA1ID R®AR Ii'4 • _ •• pR ) 9 GUEBT STALLS �RE PB m" - AT 74 OL. EAOI NAT) 1 NEW WASFI BAY r- b ° i :. I I I Q 9QD QI 291 j1 a =11 (2) MAW GLmRIE. TARO! _J L_ _ t .-- - - TM Rii GTA�TM6w � x-a I I j L -- � cro __ PROCIDE KETAL EDO F Am CONCRETE RACIER Fus. RETAEENfi WALL .- NBM OORIC fMIGEApF gATOI — IfBi COIL i SAO, nO BOLLARDS. EA01 Alm RMTIOI I Eaffm flRA AID " END OF SAM • 0 NEW SALT BLDG. ; ♦o I , NOTE: COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH CIVIL, ELECTRICAL, "- —FR'EP OOR )� - RDIVT GRY _J MECHANICAL, AND STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS _ ASRWLT PAYING — _ ° °* (SEF AIA) TM AIEA (TYPJ I - - e ' 1 e_z - OFFICE j 1 j J - RANG PMIGEf✓ / RAVING, _ IN no 20 / ADD1NOlAL AREA RBI mC FOR SALT BUY. I I I VEHICLE III Sam MRE1ER (LLTUMTE) NOTE: VEHICLE j I j I MAINTENANCE I (VBOFT) 1 11 I F.F.EL. ROD' -D° - B36' -0° STORAGE TEMP PARKING ' i" Y / �I �, (MAINT.) OM AND GwrrTI9t I I I NEW CGIG. BAe a NFwyCORX. - C m'af9.�.1 I I I iF GRADE - J QUOE TN6 AREA 19 I ..n: gJ7)Tx,'r3=.. ":' +3r:;�r':'r::� ;:'..•'.';' -..: "` TED PIQfJ15T EsitEB1 - O NE. COIL e VFW NFYI toY. aam AND BARRIFA IDtN RFN Ca1Y. Iffits �venPr) � GNERAraE GLITTER —' —� — — — — — — �— .— . —. BUILDING /SITE PLAN STU Y w 15' D' 30 / I iI EDINA pl, WORKE r•aD / n OERTEL ARCHITECTS - OB-04 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS OCU.ENT WAS BY .1 - UNDER MRYEpRECTT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY REGISTERED ARCHITECT N THE STATE OF MINNESOTA DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PROGRESS SET (NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION) EDINA PUBLIC WORKS 7450 METRO BLVD., EDINA, MINNESOTA 55439 ®@ APRIL 17, 2008 DH BR TS Ew IAl s. II. Cm A—A ST. -L M.mp.l•SS1O5 ICI)6W5116 rd (01)w IN F. a JLD SITE PLAN AND SITE DETAILS �V �O h A0.2 W cnsaa wmu m HER PREPARE AREA M EBA tl®AVATEO EKrOft3R PW®.R Rout At J --mm 11oR w W V—Rm w po"m W Lwu AT `R @q2 fV1I011 a OaBTMG m m MALL To FROWN! mm MALL To OmTda 0mTN6 MALL to oPDOG FOR IM S7ACTINE AM FROWN 2R NM me= PREPARE rat 04 ItERPr TTPE) 1RIBREAO omR Moms Alm Boa!! lVRPT TTPE) UNn%fi AM DORO go OERTEL ARCHITECTS Insf.m W c T(6Pml,Mi 166IM 7l Sf6mlm C"ll. WILL R EIISTE6 amllom PROWEE AREA FOR NON R9AATED 00910[ PANELS FROWN AM RR ION RESULTED E1mm CDCOa fi91 70 1 4101 offl3mPANELS ----------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- ----------------- - - - -,, 161 Eat:. CJTa. oERl At IItEPARE ARV 101 161 4 CAR W91 OuLm can" MALL TV MME OIL R N DIRCTIm YO own 0_2 TERIOR ELEVATION NORTH FEE W., VW., FROWN AREA PR NEW P1ATG Fl0'ME AREA FOR RBI R E ITRIOR PANELS 1� EXTERIOR ELEVATION L EAST ELEVATION —WWE FORM W —!COVE IQItlI W Elasm MAIL To MINTING MALL To PREPARE FOR NOR PREPARE Na ld Long Alm D= LKnU AID I IMONS rnEXTERIOR ELEVATION '' U ELEVATION PREPARE AM FOR RON ti4R IIARN OGaNG QCA1� KRZ AT OoeiEia — Iv+wc Ic�fo1 W Gnu- AANLL AT mime (TTP� Upom � 1m sflftCfUU E AND EnsiEC O'Cmr6 UVER EAD DoE Rcwc nmw W FM N MALL To PNS AND E FOR N HALL sT To PREPARE rae le+ RANSUAD AND Nql r61 sTRDCTARE no 1RtawAO noae avaeaAO DDVA EXTERIOR ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION Cis-04 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED pq ®m BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT 08 APRIL IT, 20 , DU LVIREGISTER D ARCHITECT � R IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA o®R DB BR Ts ON -A DESIGN DEVELOPMENT PROGRESS SET (NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION) EDINA PUBLIC WORKS 7450 METRO BLVD, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55439 A3.0 EXISTING ELEVATIONS - SELECTIVE DEMOLITION AND INFILL NEW NREPEL MTL. w RT►J omm oM mm MM m W" xa HAIL PACT UiMLPf EILLTOTAL frnJ� V. PI�ItlENO AWM, FPMLL AT .OIL J Z. AT . M� Cm Eo9T116 0= - PAW Mo., GLASS -Tn. DaTm (PANT) (ASDA Trwi !mwM am (NO@T TYPE) TA G NAIL d Y$�T�A EL 21 MT. in N TD EIL FLM L rA, ec w9ncFm1.A . !� m OERTEL ARCHITECTS ON D19AATED o(TIMM PANSB N4L PAM - Sg 21LICTIMCAL am MS"11v IOTEmI PYO& . SYSTEM (ATTA MM TO DM .W P [EL mdL MFccm W P OL nw" WLS ® Fri BY ME UNDER MY DIRECT OR DESIGN DEVELOPMENT EXTERIOR ELEVATION APRIL 17, 2008 NM I/BDB® AYR mcm r P DILL MILL <a" -TTP la FRQIOm Aun mm r P ml Y9L QAMO w. NRIATED mr4. MALL PAW SYSTEM (ATTACm m ��) cawm morM oml PAW) J � MSAM omm oM mm MM m W" xa HAIL PACT UiMLPf EILLTOTAL frnJ� V. PI�ItlENO AWM, FPMLL AT .OIL J Z. AT . M� Cm Eo9T116 0= - PAW Mo., GLASS -Tn. DaTm (PANT) (ASDA Trwi !mwM am (NO@T TYPE) TA G NAIL d Y$�T�A EL 21 MT. in N TD EIL FLM L rA, ec w9ncFm1.A . !� m OERTEL ARCHITECTS ON D19AATED o(TIMM PANSB ITMS sum nu. A.em<, sr- P.w, wmoem ssim (6S1)6 %5186 Td (6511696 -SIN Fu .e.melv[M1lumaa fK.1L Im PREIL MTL w RY►J �:� E!i ® ■i��' 1! I ® ■li ■I ®ltdll�i ■EEIE�I'�811ECi�l ®ifs ®! ®E �11�1! ®lw� O I' ELEVATION WILL SAM - SEE M.MTMOLL RTPJ N911RFF1L YTIL w (T'PJ 491 ""Mom Aun NM FFIVK "m w MI(19p W } SILL (TPJ MIL GLASS -TYP. NM lim"To E nu= MIFLS 'm m Tm EDTESOI P40D (SErOm) (SErOm). KIM PNOED9® N IYm00 W P D3 PdIL. GLASS -TYP. 101 IBAATED ER91I011 PAN" m 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION FAST ELEVATION VICF•I' '— MSAATED PETAL MWl PANEL OEM PIS ALM J ` N91 PATm L MM IRVMEMm AW'L SYSTEM (ATTA MM TO DM .W P [EL mdL MFccm W P OL nw" WLS ® O sea BY ME UNDER MY DIRECT OR DESIGN DEVELOPMENT EXTERIOR ELEVATION APRIL 17, 2008 SUPERVISION AND THAT nM PROGRESS SET EDINA PUBLIC WORKS ------------------------- SOUTH ELEVATM VI6'rl' MEN T9M. FTTL NOM Pmrnsm ALLI'L 7450 METRO BLVD, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55439 CAP (TYP.) IooiOO r P I.R DB BR TS EW ®v NALL P'ACI - ffi NS.L GSA$ -TA. MALL PM - SQ e oSTRGLL (M.) i•m••• cmj N91 MSAATED ERQLR PANED EIEMIG ETIEDOt FIISI m R@4M 191 M!M ___ —__ __ —___ _ ITMS sum nu. A.em<, sr- P.w, wmoem ssim (6S1)6 %5186 Td (6511696 -SIN Fu .e.melv[M1lumaa fK.1L Im PREIL MTL w RY►J �:� E!i ® ■i��' 1! I ® ■li ■I ®ltdll�i ■EEIE�I'�811ECi�l ®ifs ®! ®E �11�1! ®lw� O I' ELEVATION WILL SAM - SEE M.MTMOLL RTPJ N911RFF1L YTIL w (T'PJ 491 ""Mom Aun NM FFIVK "m w MI(19p W } SILL (TPJ MIL GLASS -TYP. NM lim"To E nu= MIFLS 'm m Tm EDTESOI P40D (SErOm) (SErOm). KIM PNOED9® N IYm00 W P D3 PdIL. GLASS -TYP. 101 IBAATED ER91I011 PAN" m 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION FAST ELEVATION VICF•I' P4 MALL PAC( - SEE IS.67SICIL (rY ►j _ (PANT) cmn cm 101 Nn OIMOR Z. aac FILLID M9ILATm M.E. Mol Ox NM Nn oroI M9ILATFD PETAL MWL PANS N91 ILSI ROTA .DIN N1ID x91 oR /QeA7m ME,& MA{y PA16 fm LIM GCC FILLED 0+6017) STEEL PPE �MI LAIS) HALL PAN" LOCI - ►AMT (PANT) SYSTEM (ATTAOm m ( PANT) - TTP. STEM FIE WI LAND DIME - PANT DYeTEM (ATTACm m oDOt - PAW STEEL F'PE mLATm Plm al 411E -P= (FTP. • ALL (ADMTIOI) DT MM OF DOW E ISTM -►ANY (TYP. • ALL 0713 qI O BRDIE EILSTNG -PAIIT (TYT, • ALL Cx ODCI Ox ) VONcU: 6Tmhw Ox Om0) VBICE WDRATi) Ltll omlD) EXTERIOR ELEVATION �i�BST EtEV'ATM Inc'.P x131 I MUTED METAL x41 MEN NDC" m SE NSTALLED PAM& SYSTEM (ATTACIED m SIMT M OFPIDE SEA NEW EITOILOI IF 9Ro2 EOTIi MIC10B AT 101 LfiiTICO N S T Yo110E 61GIAfJJj - SoBiID LDU \, e NSI PIEIASleC1T® I N91 PR@AEDTATID 9E0 ScYL10MT9 AT V9IaE �ul I L+ m o®c O NLYLlOS9 MM►PiEFI®m ermAa AIIFA t , Ta L L �e FIerAL smDC�. ^� C05M Tm NALL m T/w REMAM D"oSFM FM corrm KTMM � I _ _TATA IY. ISL pM DORS m NSTALLED) 900"1®, Err. EL EOM NoVtlm N ERIDL N9M STOOGE NFIIANPE STOIACE ALFA ' pm EIL RDOI FIPVATICI ERXF s ER91101 o imp AND • _ _ • iTVEMEi A o03T N MR NAIL o�TIG ETfESOI MUILS, IO47i 6TIE071/E m EFeYN m ME D TBID"ED AND I@LAOD TmOF STIOLTLDE 4m FLLOII (FL2 DEA PLAx ra 1174TI1110 NAe m TIETUN BUILDING SECTION LDNGRUDINAL SECTION VIb'•1' '— MSAATED PETAL MWl PANEL OEM PIS ALM J ` N91 PATm L MM IRVMEMm AW'L SYSTEM (ATTA MM TO DM .W P [EL mdL MFccm W P OL nw" WLS NIL (LASS -TT. yy ®� BY ME UNDER MY DIRECT OR DESIGN DEVELOPMENT EXTERIOR ELEVATION APRIL 17, 2008 SUPERVISION AND THAT nM PROGRESS SET EDINA PUBLIC WORKS SOUTH ELEVATM VI6'rl' MEN T9M. FTTL NOM Pmrnsm ALLI'L 7450 METRO BLVD, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55439 CAP (TYP.) IooiOO r P I.R DB BR TS EW ®v NALL P'ACI - ffi NS.L GSA$ -TA. MALL PM - SQ e oSTRGLL (M.) i•m••• cmj N91 MSAATED ERQLR PANED EIEMIG ETIEDOt FIISI m R@4M 191 M!M P4 MALL PAC( - SEE IS.67SICIL (rY ►j _ (PANT) cmn cm 101 Nn OIMOR Z. aac FILLID M9ILATm M.E. Mol Ox NM Nn oroI M9ILATFD PETAL MWL PANS N91 ILSI ROTA .DIN N1ID x91 oR /QeA7m ME,& MA{y PA16 fm LIM GCC FILLED 0+6017) STEEL PPE �MI LAIS) HALL PAN" LOCI - ►AMT (PANT) SYSTEM (ATTAOm m ( PANT) - TTP. STEM FIE WI LAND DIME - PANT DYeTEM (ATTACm m oDOt - PAW STEEL F'PE mLATm Plm al 411E -P= (FTP. • ALL (ADMTIOI) DT MM OF DOW E ISTM -►ANY (TYP. • ALL 0713 qI O BRDIE EILSTNG -PAIIT (TYT, • ALL Cx ODCI Ox ) VONcU: 6Tmhw Ox Om0) VBICE WDRATi) Ltll omlD) EXTERIOR ELEVATION �i�BST EtEV'ATM Inc'.P x131 I MUTED METAL x41 MEN NDC" m SE NSTALLED PAM& SYSTEM (ATTACIED m SIMT M OFPIDE SEA NEW EITOILOI IF 9Ro2 EOTIi MIC10B AT 101 LfiiTICO N S T Yo110E 61GIAfJJj - SoBiID LDU \, e NSI PIEIASleC1T® I N91 PR@AEDTATID 9E0 ScYL10MT9 AT V9IaE �ul I L+ m o®c O NLYLlOS9 MM►PiEFI®m ermAa AIIFA t , Ta L L �e FIerAL smDC�. ^� C05M Tm NALL m T/w REMAM D"oSFM FM corrm KTMM � I _ _TATA IY. ISL pM DORS m NSTALLED) 900"1®, Err. EL EOM NoVtlm N ERIDL N9M STOOGE NFIIANPE STOIACE ALFA ' pm EIL RDOI FIPVATICI ERXF s ER91101 o imp AND • _ _ • iTVEMEi A o03T N MR NAIL o�TIG ETfESOI MUILS, IO47i 6TIE071/E m EFeYN m ME D TBID"ED AND I@LAOD TmOF STIOLTLDE 4m FLLOII (FL2 DEA PLAx ra 1174TI1110 NAe m TIETUN BUILDING SECTION LDNGRUDINAL SECTION VIb'•1' JLA .° . . EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND BUILDING SECTION nt rte autm� I HEREBY 08_04 CERTIFY THAT THIS DOCUMENT WAS PREPARED �p yy ®� BY ME UNDER MY DIRECT OR DESIGN DEVELOPMENT APRIL 17, 2008 SUPERVISION AND THAT nM PROGRESS SET EDINA PUBLIC WORKS w ONLY REGISTERED ARCH' EGT IN THE STATE OF MINNESOTA 7450 METRO BLVD, EDINA, MINNESOTA 55439 DB BR TS EW ®v (NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION) e JLA .° . . EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS AND BUILDING SECTION nt rte autm� DRAFT Edina Public Works Schematic Design Estimate Public Works Facility JEOUNV` April 1.2008 ,o., �m General Condition Site Work Office Renovation Security for Office Space (Allowance) Warehouse Renovation Security for Warehouse (Allowance) Subcontractor Bonds (1.9 %) Building Permit and Fire Safety Permit Liability Insurance Builders Risk Insurance Estimate Contingency ( 4% ) Fee (1.9% ) 131610 131610 23664 23664 107946 107946 Subtotal 131610 Subtotal Subtotal Subtotal Subtotal Subtotal Main Building Subtotal 131610 $ 2.31 $143,000 $303,699 $ 5.44 $626,969 $716,395 $ 90.71 $1,659,842 $2,146,584 $ 0.12 $2,954 $2,954 $ 45.95 $4,722,643 $4,960,368 $ 0.10 $11,182 $11,182 $ 54.47 $7,168,589 $8,141,182 $136,203 $154,682 $7,304,792 $8,295,864 $57,349 $66,367 $7,362,141 $8,362,231 $77,302 $87,803 $7,439,444 $8,450,035 By Owner By Owner $7,439,444 $8,450,035 $371,972 $338,001 $7,811,416 $8,788,036 $148,417 $166,973 $ 66,04 $7,959,833 $8,955,009 $160,699 $87,426 $486,742 $0 $237,725 $0 $972,593 $18,479 $991,072 $9,018 $1,000,090 $10,501 $1,010,591 By Owner $1,010,591 ($33,971) $976,620 $18,556 $995,176 Alt #2 Warehouse Roof Replacement (TPO Roof Allow.) $841,979 $845,423 $3,444 Alt #5 Office Roof Replacement (TPO Roof Allowance) $184,579 $183,930 ($649) Alt #7 New Exterior Insulated Wall Panels (Allowance) $458,480 $443,796 ($14,684) Alt #8 Washing Bay 3,757 $ 186.22 $535,000 $699,625 $164,625 AIL #9 Salt Building 6,600 $ 80.07 $233,100 $528,433 $295,333 AIL #10 Fuel Station (No Overhead Canopy) $180,000 $178,650 ($1,350) Mechanical Buildout (in base Bid) $191250 $0 ($191'250) Subtotal $2,624,388 $2,879,857 $255,469 Fee (1.9%) $49.863 $54,717 $4,854 Satellite Building Subtotal $2,674,251 $2,934,574 $260,323 Conetruction Cost Toted $10,634,084. $11,889,583 $1,255,499 Owner Furnishings $100,000 $100,000 $0 Testing $25,000 $25,000 $0 Owner Contingency (7%) $940,333 $1,046,441 $106,108 Preliminary Project Cost $11,699,417 $13,061,024 $1,361,607 Misc. Alternates Alt #1 Warehouse Roof Replacement (Ballasted EPDM) $672,247 Alt #3 Warehouse Roof Replacement (Built -Up roof) $1,009,907 DRAF Alt #4 Office Roof Replacement (Ballasted EPDM) $161,396 Alt #6 Office Roof Replacement (Built -Up Roof) $226,469 O Alt #11 Paint Walls and Cigs. @ Vehicle Storage Area $116,719 Z o F;01�- INF✓�Tfv� 1-2 3zz� 24-+ City of Edina Analysis of Tax Impact for Public Works Building With TIF District Decertification Offset Net Proceeds of$22M including Interest Earnings Bond Issue of $14M in 2008 and $8.165M in 2009 Interest Rates at .35°% Above Market Valuation (Pay 2008) Total Annual Debt Levy at 105°% Less New Taxes from pre -79 TIF Annual Debt Debt Levy at 105°% Est. Tax Rates (Debt Service Divided by Valuation) =u'll Tax Increase in 2010 .Partial Tax Increase 2009 20 Year Term 101,047,450 1,882,650 515,000 1,067,650 0.010566 The figures in the table are based on taxes for the bond issue only, and do not include tax levies for other purposes. Tax increases shown above are gross increases, not including the impact of the state Property Tax Refund ( "Circuit Breaker') program. Many owners of homestead property will qualify for a refund, based on their income and total property taxes. This will decrease the net effect of the referendum levy for many property owners. Taxable Estimated Type of Property Market Value Annual Impact $200, 000 $21 300,000 $32 400, 000 $42 Residential 939.000 - - - __ -- _ $46 _ Homestead - - 500, 000 $53 (2008 median value home is $439,000) 600;000 700,000 $66 $79 800,000 $92 900, 000 $106 1, 000, 000 $119 1,1D0,000 $132 $50,400 $5 Commercial/ 25D,000 $29 Industrial 500, 000 $64 1,000,000 $132 5,000,000 $682 10, 000,000 $1,368 25, 000, 000 $3,429 The figures in the table are based on taxes for the bond issue only, and do not include tax levies for other purposes. Tax increases shown above are gross increases, not including the impact of the state Property Tax Refund ( "Circuit Breaker') program. Many owners of homestead property will qualify for a refund, based on their income and total property taxes. This will decrease the net effect of the referendum levy for many property owners. City of Edina, MN $14,000,000 G.O. CIP Bonds, Series 2008 $8,165,000 Lease Revenue Bonds, Series 2009 Proposed serles 2068 101161206$ Proposed Series 2009 i 10/112009 For Discussion Purposes C Par Amount of Bonds 14;000,000 Par Amount of Bonds 9,165,000 Other sourees of Funds __ Other Sources of Funds. Total sourees 14,000,000 Total Sources 811861000 Total Underwriter's Discount (0,7508/x) 105,000 Total Underwriter's Discount (1,260 %) 102,063 Costs of Issuance 75,000 Costs of Issuance 80,000 Deposit to Capitalized Interest (CIF) Fund Int Int (Deposit to Capitalized Interest Fund Total Deposit To Construction Fund 1 ,t3Z0 b00 Deposit To Construction Fund 8,000,000 Total Uses 14,000,000 Rounding __2L_ 9313 Total Uses 8,162,063 Average Coupon 4,4619% Average Coupon 6,0030% Levy Collect Period Cap Total Cap Total Combined Year Year Ending Prin Rate Int Int P & 1 Prin Rate Int Int P & I Total 10/15/2008 2007 2008 2008 2009 211/2009 2/1/2010 764;053 764;053 • 764,053 2009_2010 2/1/2011 3.25°x6_ 591,52_5_ 186,000 3,60% 523,713 Ei88,713 _1,795,238_ 2010 2011 211/2012 _515,000 530,000 3:25°/- _ 574;788 _ _1;106,525 1,104,788 300,000 3,7696 387,010 687,010 1,791,798 2011 2012 2/1/2013 550;Oo0 3,508% 557,563 1,107,563 310,000 4.00% 375,760 886,760 1,793,323 2012 2013 2/1/2014 3.50% 538,313 320,000 4110% 363,360 063,300 1,791,673 2013 2014 2/1/2015 _570,000 _ 590,000 3:5b% 518,363 _1;108,313 1,108,363 335,000 4.2096 360,240 ®86,240 1,793,603 2014 2015 2/1/2016 610,000 3:75 9/0 497,713 1;107;713 346,000 4.60% 336,170 681,170 1,788,883 2015 2016 2/1/2017 630,000_3,75% 474,838 1,104;838 386,000 4,60% 320,845 686,846 ; 1,790,483 2016 2017 2/1/2018 655,000 4,000 451,713 1,106,213 386,000 4.70% 303,865 688,865 1,795,068 2017 2018 2/1/2019 680,000 4,00 6/6 425,013 1,105,013 400,000 4:76% 286,760 886,760 1,790,773 2018 2019_ 211/2020 710,000_ 4:00 -/0 397;813 1,107;813 416,000 4.8 % -% 266,760 681,760 1,789,573 2019 2020 2/1/2021 740,000 4.25 -/0 369,413 1,109,413 436,000 4.90 246,840 681,840 1,791,253 2020 2021 2/1/2022 770,000 4:25% 337;963 1,107,963 460,000 6,00% 225,626 686,526 1,793,488 2021 2022 2/1/2023 800;000_ 4:506 1238 3_05 2313 1,105,-_ 485,000 6,00% 202,625 687,626 1,792,763 2022 2023 2/1/2024 840,000 4:50 %269,238 1,109,2 8 505,000 6:0096 178,276 663,276 1,792,513 2023 2024 211/2025 875,000 4:50% 231,438 1,106,438 630,000 6.00% 163,026 683,025 1,789,463 2024 2025 915,000 4,766A 192,063 1,107,063 660,000 6,2696 126,626 880,626 1,793,588 2025 2026 _211/2026 211/2027 --- 96d,000�4:75 %148,606 - - -- 1,108,600 685,000 6:2696 ®7,126 882,126 1,790,725 2026 2027 211/2028 1,005,000 5:000k 103,000 1,108,000 615,000 6,26% 68,413 081,413 1,789,413 2027 2028 211/2029 1;055,000 5,0088 52,750 1,107,750 850,000 5,260A 34,126 084,126 1,791,875 7;800,891 21,800891 ®�166L000 _____ 4,843,851 13,008,651 34,809,541 14 000,000 Prepared by Ehlers & Associates, Inc. 8/1212008 EHLERS o e 7886 Proposed Schedule of Events Relocation of Edina Public Works Facility 2008 August 4 Present Term Sheet to Council Council calls for Public Hearing on 8/19 August 19 Council holds public hearing on project Council motion on preparation of purchase agreement September 2 Council considers purchase agreement Council may call for sale of bonds September 16 Sale of bonds at direction of Council October 15 Tentative closing date on Con Agra property oi,I � REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer VIA: . Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: August 19, 2008 AGENDA ITEM IV. A. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Light Poles 501h & France Area DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED 11 BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE NA: July 23, 2008 Company 1. Fusion Lighting 2. Luma Sales Associates RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Fusion Lighting September 23, 2008 Amount of Quote or Bid 1. $33,547.50 2. $38,073.75 $ 33,547.50 GENERAL INFORMATION: This purchase is for four Light Poles and two Bollard Bases for the downtown (50th and France Business area). Two light poles and one bollard base were damaged by a vehicular accident;. these will be paid for by the vehicle owners Insurance Company. The other light poles and bollard will be funded through the Public Works Budget and will be kept as replacements for the future. WCS ure The Recommended Bid is within budget not within b G:\ Engineering \Administration \CORRPW\RFP - Misc \rfp 20080819 Light Poles at 50th.doc Public Works — Street Department all#, Finance Director Manager REQUEST FOR PURCHASE TO: Mayor & City Council FROM: Wayne D. Houle, PE, Director of Public Works / City Engineer VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: August 19, 2008 AGENDA ITEM IV. B. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Woodland Circle, Woodland Lane and Wood End Drive Sewer, Water, & Street Reconstruction: Contract No. ENG 08 -12; Improvement BA- 45,352; STS - 346.349: WM- 466.484: SS- 440.442 and L -52.53 DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED August 13, 2008 Company 1. CK Excavating Inc. 2. Kuechle Underground, Inc 3. Dave Perkins Contracting, Inc. 4. Northwest Asphalt, Inc 5. Palda and Sons, Inc. 6. Minger Construction, Inc. 7. Thomas and Sons Construction 8. Redstone Construction Co. Inc. 9. G.L. Contracting, Inc. 10. Max Steininger, Inc. 11. Midwest Asphalt Corp. 12. Bituminous Roadways, Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: C &L Excavating, Inc. GENERAL INFORMATION: BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE October 13, 2008 Amount of Quote or Bid $ 602,422.15 $ 632,156.50 $ 634,932.50 $ 643,847.78 $ 650,575.20 $ 664,611.05 $ 666,328.97 $ 668,782.47 $ 678,141.65 $ 690,925.00 $ 697,112.50 $ 765,577.45 $602,422.15 This project is for street and utility improvements throughout the streets of Woodland Circle, Woodland Lane and Wood End Drive. The project includes reconstructing the existing roadways, rehabilitating the watermain and sanitary sewers, upgrading the storm sewer systems and street lighting systems. The project was originally Wood End Drive (BA -352) Public Hearing. two public hearings, Woodland Circle and Woodland Lane (BA -345) and Both projects were ordered by the Edina City Council at the July 1, 2008, This project will be funded by special assessments and respective utility funds. The project estimate was $853,250. Staff recommends awarding the project to C &L Excavating, Inc. L ��_ iM,�_�' a ignature The Recommended Bid is within budget not within Public Works — Engineering Hughes, alli7, Fifnance Director GAEngineering \Contract Numbers\2008 \ENG 08-12 Woodland Ln & Cir Improvements\ADMIN\MISC\ENG 08-12 RFP.doc ,o e o REQUEST FOR PURCHASE Oft-7W.MP-OW, TO: Mayor Hovland and Members of the City Council FROM: John Keprios, Director of Parks and Recreation VIA: Gordon Hughes, City Manager SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR PURCHASE IN EXCESS OF $15,000 DATE: August 19, 2008 AGENDA ITEM: IV. C. ITEM DESCRIPTION: Edinborough Park Fire Alarm Replacement — Contract No. 08 -8PK DATE BID OPENED OR QUOTE RECEIVED: BID OR QUOTE EXPIRATION DATE: August 14, 2008 September 14, 2008 Company 1. Master Technology Group 2. Low Voltage Contractors 3. Egan Company 4. Siemens Building Technologies 5. Electronic Communication Systems, Inc. RECOMMENDED QUOTE OR BID: Master Technology Group $30,580.00 Amount of Ouote or Bid 1. $30,580.00 2. $34,575.00 3. $36,625.00 4. $41,300.00 5. $52,300.00 CIP PROJECT #: ECL -08 -013 ACCOUNT NUMBER: 5600.1720 GENERAL INFORMATION: This is for purchase and installation of a new fire alarm panel and building monitoring system for Edinborough Park. This Simplex system will replace the original Gamewell Fire Alarm panel and components which are 21 years old and are experiencing mechanical failure. Due to the age of the system, parts are no longer available to repair the panel and we have been experiencing numerous false alarms. Without a functional fire alarm system in place, by State law Edinborough Park would have to be closed for public or private use. Life exnectancv of this eQuinment was 15 - 20 vears. Staff worked with Dunham Engineering and Edina Fire Marshall Tom Jensen and the State Fire Marshall to design the system to bring the system up to current codes. The new replacement system also addresses the changed use of the facility with the addition of Adventure Peak and the Birthday Party Plateau. Edinborough Park's unique construction and the acoustic challenges posed by the facility allowed us to eliminate the voice announcement part of the system, which created a significant financial savings. This new system includes audible and visible alarm devices, smoke detectors, fire alarm control units and cabinets, and all new detection system low voltage wiring/cabling throughout the park. This new system also provides a network interface connection with our Ethernet communications network and ability to automatically send alarms to pagers and send email alarm messages automatically. This is a 2008 Capital Improvement Plan project budgeted at $70,000. Five closed bids were opened on Thursday, August 14, and the low bid was Master Technology Group (MTG) from Savage, Minnesota. MTG is a reputable low voltage professional vendor who has been in the business for seven years. MTG attended the pre -bid meeting walk through with the consulting engineer and MTG is comfortable and familiar with the facility, specifications and expectations. Master Technology Group provided 10 references of which I contacted five. All five gave very positive feedback on their experiences with Master Technology Group. If awarded by Council, the project will be complete no later than October 31. 2008. r John Ke ri s, Director This Recommended bid is within budget not wit] Edina Park and Recreation otte REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item V.A. From: Debra Mangen Consent ❑ City Clerk Information Only ❑ Date: August 19, 2008 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Resolution Receiving Donations Action ❑ Motion Resolution Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Adopt Resolution. Info /Background: In order to comply with State Statutes all donations to the City must be adopted by a resolution approved by four favorable votes of the Council accepting the donation. I have prepared the attached resolution detailing the various donors, their gifts and the recipient departments for your consideration. RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -71 ACCEPTING DONATIONS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF EDINA WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 allows cities to accept grants and donations of real or personal property for the benefit of its citizens; WHEREAS, said donations must be accepted via a resolution of the Council adopted by a two thirds majority of its members. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Edina City Council accepts with sincere appreciation the following listed donations on behalf of its citizens. Donations to Braemar Golf Course: Richard Leonard Donations to Edina Art Center: Barb Lippert Cynthia Fleury Dated: August 19, 2008 Attest: $50.00 Braemar Mens Club $10.00 Barbara Bindgen $20.00 Kit Wojcik - Stone Soup Dollmakers Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK $173.00 $50.00 $100.00 James B. Hovland, Mayor I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 19, 2008 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20_ City Clerk i" �r REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Boyd Tate Information Only Traffic Safety Coordinator Date: August 19, 2008 Subject: Traffic Safety Staff Review for Action August 6, 2008. Recommendation: Agenda Item V. B. Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Review and approve Traffic Safety Staff Review of Wednesday, August 6, 2008. Info /Background: It is not anticipated that residents will be in attendance at the Council meeting regarding any of the attached issues. G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Traffic \Traffic Advisory Committee \Staff Review Summaries \08 TSAC & Min \08- 06- 08.doc J TRAFFIC SAFETY STAFF REVIEW Wednesday, August 6, 2008 The staff review of traffic safety matters occurred on August 6, 2008. Staff present included the City Engineer, Assistant City Engineer, City Planner, Traffic Safety Coordinator, Sign Coordinator and Deputy Chief of Police. From that review, the recommendations below are provided. On each of the items, persons involved have been contacted and the staff recommendation has been discussed with them. They were also informed that if they disagree with the recommendation or have additional facts to present, they can be included on the August 19, 2008, Council Agenda. SECTION A• Requests on which staff recommends approval: Request for a "No U -Turn" sign at the intersection of Valley View Road and Washington Avenue for west bound Valley View Traffic. This request comes from a non resident that works at the Industrial Park at 7674 Washington Avenue and travels through this intersection several times each day. Requestor states that during peek hours, people exit off southbound 169, really wanting to go to the left (east), over the overpass, at the top of the ramp, but turn right (west) and get into the left turn lane and then make u- turns on a left turn light, which causes many close calls for people trying to turn right off of Washington Avenue. Requestor feels that a No U- Turn sign at this location would help traffic flow, especially during the P.M. rush, for people getting out of the Industrial Park area. Staff observed this intersection during afternoon rush hours and did observe several vehicles making these turns. Valley View Road, to the east of Washington Avenue, is a B -Minor Arterial roadway with an average Mon. -Fri. traffic count of 12,363 vehicles, and an 85th percentile speed of 28.8 mph. There has been one injury accident and several property damage accidents reported at this intersection in the past five years. Due of the high volume of traffic at this intersection, staff agrees that a "No U -Turn" sign would make traffic flow smoother and safer. Traffic Safety Staff Review August 6, 2008 Page 1 of 2 I, Staff recommends that a "No U- Turn" sign be installed at the intersection of Valley View Road and Washington Avenue, for west bound Valley View Road traffic. The City of Eden Prairie will be consulted. 2. Request for some type of traffic calming on Cornelia Drive between west 66`h Street and west 70`h Street. This request comes from a resident on the 6900 block of Cornelia Drive who is concerned about the volume and speed of vehicles traveling between west 66`h Street to the north and west 701h Street to the south. Cornelia Drive is a 30 -foot wide city street with curb, gutter and no sidewalks. This section of Cornelia Drive has an average Mon. -Fri. traffic count of 1,199 vehicles and an 85`h- percentile speed of 29.2 mph. Several accidents have been reported at the intersections of west 66` Street and west 70`h Street in the past five years. No accidents have been reported in the section of Cornelia Drive between those two intersections. Staff has received several phone calls from residents in this area with similar concerns over the past few years. There is a perception that many cars are traveling at excessive speeds. However, traffic studies have not indicated such. However, staff does recommend, as part of the 2007 first addition of the Southdale roadway reconstruction project, that "All -Way" stop signs be installed at Cornelia Drive and Dunberry Lane, and at Southdale Road and west 68`h Street, in an effort to calm traffic in the area. Staff recommends that "All Way" stop signs be installed at the intersections of Cornelia Drive at Dunberry Lane, and Southdale SECTION B: Requests on which staff recommends denial of request. None for Wednesday, August 6, 2008 meeting. SECTION C: Requests that are deferred to a later date or referred to others. None for Wednesday, August 6, 2008 meeting. Traffic Safety Staff Review Page 2 of 2 August 6, 2008 r w9. A.r� o e 4 REPORT/RE C OMMENDATION To: MAYOR AND COUNCIL From: SHERRY ENGELMAN CITY SANITARIAN Date: August 19, 2008 Subject: Resolution Authorizing Master Grant Contract With Minnesota Department of Health Agenda Item Consent ❑ Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ El El # V.C. To HRA To Council Motion Resolution Ordinance Discussion RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution No. 2008 -78 authorizing a Master Grant Contract with the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) from January 1, 2009 — December 31, 2013, for public health services. INFORMATIONBACKGROUND: The Master Grant Contract (MGC) administratively simplifies the review of grant agreements for local public health agencies. It is important because it applies to all public health services grants that the MDH distributes to the local public health agencies. Our current Master Grant Contract will expire December 31, 2008. During the current five year contract term, January 1, 2004- December 31, 2008, Edina received public health services grant awards totaling $908,124. We anticipate slight reductions to this amount over the next five years. The City Attorney has reviewed and approved the contract. RESOLUTION NO 2008 -78 AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF EDINA TO ENTER INTO A MASTER GRANT CONTRACT WITH THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WHEREAS, the STATE, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 144.0742, is empowered to enter into a contractual agreement for the provision of statutorily prescribed public health services; and WHEREAS,the STATE and the GRANTEE anticipate entering into project agreements with respect to one or more individual grant projects; and WHEREAS,the STATE and the GRANTEE wish to streamline to project agreements for individual grant projects by incorporating by reference the provisions of this master grant contract; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Edina City Council that the Mayor and the City Manager enter into Master Grant Contract with the Minnesota Department of Health to administratively simplify the review of all grant agreements from January 1, 2009 - December 31, 2013 for the City of Edina. Attest: Passed and adopted this 19th day of August 2008. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk James B. Hovland, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 19, 2008, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 20_ City Cleric M —IN .N E S 0-,T A DEPARTMENToFHEAiTH MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH MASTER GRANT CONTRACT FOR COMMUNITY.HEALTH.B4OARDS THIS MASTER GRANT CONTRACT, and amendments and supplements thereto, is between the State of Minnesota, acting through -its Minnesota 'Department of Health (hereinafter "STATE ") and City of Edina CHB, an independent organization, not an employee of the State of Minnesota, address 5801 W. 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424 (hereinafter "GRANTEE "), witnesseth that: WHEREAS, the STATE, pursuant to Minnesota Statute § 144.0742 is empowered to enter into a contractual agreement for the provision of statutorily prescribed public health services; WHEREAS, the STATE and the GRANTEE anticipate entering into project agreements with respect to one or more individual grant projects; and WHEREAS, the STATE and the GRANTEE wish to streamline the project agreements for individual grant projects by incorporating by reference the provisions of this master grant contract. NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed: I. TERM OF AGREEMENT This master grant contract shall be effective on January 1, 2009, or upon the date that the final required signature is obtained by the STATE, pursuant to Minnesota Statute § 16C.05, Subdivision 2, whichever occurs later, and shall remain in effect until December 31, 2013 except for the requirements specified in this master grant contract with completion dates which extend beyond the termination date specified in this sentence. The STATE will enter into project agreements with the GRANTEE for individual grant programs and responsibilities within this aforementioned time frame. The expiration of this master grant contract is not subject to appeal. The following clauses survive the expiration or cancellation of this master grant contract: VI. Liability, VII. State Audits, VIII. Data Practices Act, IX. Ownership of Materials and Intellectual, Property Rights, X. Publicity, XII. Antitrust, XIII. Jurisdiction and Venue, and XIV. Disputes. II. CONDITIONS OF PAYMENT All services provided by GRANTEE pursuant to this grant contract shall be performed to the satisfaction of the STATE and in accord with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations. GRANTEE shall not receive payment for work found by the STATE to be unsatisfactory, or performed in violation of federal, state or local law, ordinance, rule or regulation. A. FEDERAL FUNDS: When payments are to be made from federal funds obtained by the STATE, if at any time such funds become unavailable, this grant contract shall be terminated immediately upon written notice of such fact by the STATE to the GRANTEE. In the event of such termination, GRANTEE shall be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed. B. STATE FUNDS: When payments are to be made from STATE funds, if at any time these STATE funds for this grant become unavailable, this grant contract shall be terminated immediately upon written notice of such fact by the STATE to the GRANTEE. In the event of such termination, GRANTEE shall be entitled to payment, determined on a pro ratabasis, for services'satisfactorily performed. Master Grant Contract # 12- 700 -00078 Page 1 between the. Minnesota Department of Health and City of Edina CHB 01/2008 III. CANCELLATION A. If the GRANTEE fails to comply with the provisions of this master grant contract, the STATE may terminate this master grant contract without prejudice to the right of the STATE to recover any money previously paid. The termination shall be effective five business days after the STATE mails, by certified mail, return receipt requested, written notice of termination to the GRANTEE at its last known address. B. The STATE or GRANTEE may cancel this master grant contract at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days' written notice to the other parry. IV. ASSIGNMENT GRANTEE shall not assign, transfer, or subcontract any rights or obligations under this grant contract without the prior written consent of the STATE. The GRANTEE is responsible for holding any subcontracting entities to the same standards required of the GRANTEE. V. AMENDMENTS Any amendments to this grant contract shall be in writing, and will not be effective until the amendment has been fully executed by the same parties who executed the original of this grant contract, or their successors in office. VI. LIABILITY GRANTEE shall indemnify, save, and hold the STATE, its representatives and employees harmless from any and all claims or causes of action, including reasonable attorney's fees incurred by the STATE, arising from the performance of this grant contract by GRANTEE or GRANTEE'S agents or employees. This clause shall not be construed to bar any legal remedies GRANTEE may have for the STATE'S failure to fulfill its obligations pursuant to this grant contract. Nothing herein shall be construed as a waiver by GRANTEE of any of the immunities or limitations of liability to which GRANTEE may be entitled pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 466, or pursuant to any other statute or law. VII. STATE AUDITS The books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the GRANTEE relevant to this grant contract shall be made available to and are subject to examination by the STATE, including the contracting Agency/Division, Legislative Auditor, and State Auditor for a minimum period of six years from the end of the term of this grant contract. VIII. DATA PRACTICES ACT The GRANTEE and the STATE shall comply with the Minnesota Data Practices Act and other applicable laws as they apply to all data provided by the STATE in accordance with this grant contract and as they apply to all data created, gathered, generated or acquired in accordance with this grant contract. IX. OWNERSHIP OF MATERIALS AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS This clause IX shall not apply to any grant projects involving the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC Program). A. Except as provided otherwise in Minnesota or United States law, the GRANTEE shall own all rights, title and interest in all of the materials conceived or created by the GRANTEE, or its employees or subgrantees, either individually or jointly with others and which arise out of the performance of this grant contract, including any inventions, reports, studies, designs, drawings, specifications, notes, Master Grant Contract # 12- 700 -00078 Page 2 between the Minnesota Department of Health and City of Edina CHB 01/2008 . documents, software and documentation, computer based training modules, electronically, magnetically or digitally recorded material, and other work in whatever form ( "MATERIALS ") The STATE agrees to, and hereby does, assign all rights, title and interest it may have in the MATERIALS to the GRANTEE. The STATE shall, upon request of the GRANTEE, execute,all papers and perform all other acts necessary to transfer or record the GRANTEE'S ownership interest in the MATERIALS. B. GRANTEE represents and warrants that MATERIALS produced or used under this grant contract do not and will not infringe upon any intellectual property rights of another, including but not limited to patents, copyrights, trade secrets, trade names, and service marks and names. GRANTEE shall indemnify and defend the STATE, at GRANTEE'S expense, from any action or claim brought against the STATE to the extent that it is based on a claim that all or parts of the MATERIALS infringe upon the intellectual property rights of another. GRANTEE shall be responsible for payment of any and all such claims, demands, obligations, liabilities, costs, and damages including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney fees arising out of this grant contract, amendments and supplements thereto, which are attributable to such claims or actions. If such a claim or action arises, or in GRANTEE'S or the STATE'S opinion is likely to arise, GRANTEE shall at the STATE'S discretion either procure for the STATE the right or license to continue using the MATERIALS at issue or replace or modify the allegedly infringing MATERIALS as necessary and appropriate to obviate the infringement claim. This remedy of the STATE shall be in addition to and shall not be exclusive of other remedies provided by law. C. The GRANTEE hereby grants to the STATE a perpetual, irrevocable, no -fee right and license to make, have made, reproduce, modify, distribute, perform, and otherwise use the MATERIALS for any and all purposes, in all forms and manners that the STATE, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate. The GRANTEE shall, upon the request of the STATE, execute all papers and perform all other acts necessary, to document and secure said right and license to the MATERIALS by the STATE. At the request of the STATE, the GRANTEE shall permit the STATE to inspect the original MATERIALS and provide a copy of any of the MATERIALS to the STATE, without cost, for use by the STATE in any manner the STATE, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate. X. PUBLICITY Any publicity given to the program, publications, or services provided resulting from this grant contract, including, but not limited to, notices, informational pamphlets, press releases, research, reports, signs, and similar public notices prepared by or for the GRANTEE or its employees individually or jointly with others, or any subgrantees shall identify the STATE as a sponsoring agency and shall not _be released, unless such release is approved in advance in writing by the STATE'S Authorized Representative. XI. ENDORSEMENT The Grantee must not claim that the STATE endorses its products or services. XII. WORKER'S COMPENSATION The GRANTEE certifies that it is in compliance with Minnesota Statute, §176.181, SL}bdivision 2, pertaining to workers' compensation insurance coverage. The GRANTEE'S employees and agents will not be considered STATE employees. Any claims that may arise under the Minnesota Workers' Compensation Act on behalf of these employees and any claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of these employees are in no way the STATE'S obligation or responsibility. Master Grant Contract # 12- 700 -00078 Page 3 between the Minnesota Department of Health and City of Edina CHB 01/2008 XIII. JURISDICTION AND VENUE This grant contract, and amendments and supplements thereto, shall be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. To the extent litigation is not prohibited by section XIV of this grant contract, venue for all legal proceedings arising out of this grant contract, or breach thereof, shall be in the state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota XIV. DISPUTES Any dispute shall be decided by the STATE'S Authorized Representative for the particular grant project that the dispute concerns. The STATE'S Authorized Representative will be identified in each project agreement between the STATE and GRANTEE. If GRANTEE is dissatisfied with the decision of the STATE'S Authorized Representative, GRANTEE'S sole and exclusive remedy is an administrative hearing before an administrative law judge under the contested case procedures of the Minnesota Administrative Procedure Act, Chapter 14 of the Minnesota Statutes. Pursuant to Chapter 14, the administrative law judge shall make a report to the Minnesota Commissioner of Health, who shall make the final decision on the contested case. If GRANTEE wishes to request an administrative hearing, GRANTEE must request a hearing in a writing received by the STATE within 30 calendar days after the GRANTEE'S receipt of the decision of the STATE'S Authorized Representative. The decision of the Minnesota Commissioner of Health shall be subject to judicial review as provided in the Minnesota Administrative Procedure Act at Minnesota Statutes, § 14.63 to 14.69. XV. OTHER PROVISIONS A. Ownership of Equipment Disposition of all equipment purchased under this grant shall be in accordance with Title 45, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 74, Subpart C. For all equipment having a current per unit fair market value of $5,000 or more, the STATE shall have the right to require transfer of the equipment (including title) to the Federal Government -or to an eligible non - Federal parry named by the STATT This right will normally be exercised by the STATE only if the project or program for which the equipment was acquired is transferred from GRANTEE to another. If the GRANTEE receives funding for the WIC program, the Ownership of Equipment language outlined in the WIC project agreement supersedes this clause XV (A). B. Contractor Debarment, Suspension And Responsibility Certification Federal Regulation 45 CFR 92.35 prohibits the STATE from purchasing goods or services with federal money from vendors who have been suspended or debarred by the federal government. Similarly, Minnesota Statute, § 16C.03, Subdivision 2, provides the Commissioner of Administration with the authority to debar and suspend vendors who seek to contract with the STATE. Vendors may be suspended or debarred when it is determined, through a duly authorized hearing process, that they have abused the public trust in a serious manner. In particular, the federal government expects the STATE to have a process in place for determining whether a vendor has been suspended or debarred, and to prevent such vendors from receiving federal funds. By signing this grant contract, GRANTEE certifies that it and its principals: Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from transacting business by or with any federal, state or local government department or agency; and 2. Have not within a three -year period preceding this grant contract: a) been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in Master Grant Contract # 12- 700 -00078 Page 4 between the Minnesota Department of Health and City of Edina CHB 01/2008 connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain or performing a public (federal, state or local) transaction or contract; b) violated any federal or state antitrust statutes; or c) committed embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements or receiving stolen property; and 3. Are not presently indicted or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a government entity for: a) commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain or performing a public (federal, state or local) transaction; b) violating any federal or`state antitrust statutes; or c) ,committing embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction �of records, rnaking false statements or receiving stolen'property; and 4. Are not aware of any information and possess no knowledge that any subeontractor(s) that will perform work pursuant 7to this grant contract are in violation of any of the certifications set forth above. C. Audit Requirements 1. If the GRANTEE`expends total federal assistance of $500,000 or more per year, the GRANTEE agrees to (1) obtain either a single audit or a program- specific audit made for the fiscal year in accordance with the terms of the Single Audit Act of 1984, as amended (3.1 U.S Code Chapter 75) and OMB Circular A -133; -and (2) to comply with the Single Audit Act 'of 1984, as amended (31 U.S. Code Chapter 75) and OMB Circular A -133. Audits shall be made annually unless the grantee is a state or local government that has, by January 1, 1987, a constitutional or statutory requirement for less frequent audits. For those governments, the federal cognizant agency shall permit biennial audits, covering both years, if the government so requests. It shall also honor requests for biennial audits by state or local governments that have an administrative policy calling for audits less frequent than annual, but only audits prior to 1987 or administrative. policies in place prior to January' 1, 1987. . 2. The audit shall be made by an independent auditor. An independent auditor is a state or local government auditor or a public accountant who meets the independence standards specified in the General Accounting Office's "Standards for Audit of Government Organizations, Programs, Activities, and Functions." The audit report shall state that the audit was performed in accordance with the provisions of OMB CircularA- 133 (or A -110 as applicable). The reporting requirements for audit reports shall be in accordance with the American Institute, of Certified Public Accountants' (AICPA) audit guide, "Audits of State' and Local Governmental Units," issued in 1986. The federal government has approved the use of the audit guide. In addition to the audit report, the GRANTEE shall provide comments on the findings and recommendations in the report, including a plan for corrective action taken or planned and comments on the status of corrective action taken on prior findings. If corrective action is not necessary, a statement describing the reason it is not should accompany the audit report. 4. The GRANTEE agrees that the grantor, the Legislative Auditor, the State Auditor, and any independent auditor designated by the - grantor shall have such access to GRANTEE'S records Master Grant Contract #/ 12- 700 -00078 Page 5 between the Minnesota Department of Health and City of Edina CHB 01/2008 and financial statements as may be necessary for the grantor to comply with the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1984, as amended (31 U.S. Code Chapter 75) and OMB Circular A -133. 5. Subcontractors of federal financial assistance from GRANTEE are also required to comply with the Single Audit Act Amendments of 1984, as amended (31 U.S. Code Chapter 75) and OMB Circular A -133. 6. The Statement of Expenditures form can be used for the schedule of federal assistance. 7. The GRANTEE agrees to retain documentation to support the schedule of federal assistance for at least four years. 8. The GRANTEE agrees to file required audit reports with the State Auditor's Office, Single Audit Division, and with federal and state agencies providing federal assistance, within six months of the grantee's fiscal year end. OMB Circular A -133 requires recipients of more than $500,000 in federal funds to submit one copy of the audit report within 30 days after issuance to the central clearinghouse at the following address: Bureau of the Census Data Preparation Division 1201 East 10th Street Jeffersonville, Indiana 47132 Attn: Single Audit Clearinghouse D. Drug Free Workplace GRANTEE agrees to comply with the Drug -Free Workplace Act of 1988, as implemented at 34 CFR Part 85, Subpart F. E. Lobbyin The GRANTEE agrees to comply with the provisions of United States Code, Title 31, Section 1352. The GRANTEE must not use any federal funds from the STATE to pay any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of a.federal agency, a member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or any employee of a member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, or the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan or cooperative agreement. If the GRANTEE uses any funds other than the federal funds from the STATE to conduct any of the aforementioned activities, the GRANTEE must complete and submit to the STATE the disclosure form specified by the STATE. Further, the GRANTEE must include the language of this provision in all contracts and subcontracts and all contractors and subcontractors must comply accordingly. F. Equal Employment Opportunity GRANTEE agrees to comply with the Executive Order 11246 "Equal Employment Opportunity" as amended by Executive Order 113.75 and supplemented by regulations at 41 CFR Part 60. G. Cost Principles The GRANTEE agrees to comply with the provisions of OMB Circular A -21, A -87 or A -122 regarding cost principles for administration of this grant award. Master Grant Contract # 12- 700 -00078 Page 6 between the Minnesota Department of Health and City of Edina CHB 01/2008 H. Rights to Inventions - Experimental, Developmental or Research Work The GRANTEE agrees to comply with 37 CFR, Part 401, "Rights to Inventions Made by Nonprofit Organizations and Small Business Firms Under Government Grants, Contracts -and Cooperative Agreements" and any implementing regulations issued by the awarding agency. I. Clean Air Act The GRANTEE agrees to comply' with all applicable. standards; orders or regulations issued ;pursuant to the Clean Air Act as amended (42 U.S:C: 7401 et, seq.) and the Federal Water Pollution- Control Act as amended;(33 'U.S C. 1251 et =seq ). Violations shall be reported.to the Federal awarding agency and, the Regional Office of the Environmental. Protection Agency (EPA)., r J. No Smokinl? With-;respect to facilities over which the GRANTEE has control, the GRANTEE shall prohibit smoking in any area of the hospital, health care clinic, doctor's office or other health care - related public facility, except as allowed by Minnesota Statutes, § 144.414, Subdivision 3. K. No Conflict of interest The GRANTEE hereby assures that no interest exists, directly or indirectly; which could conflict in any manner or degree with the GRANTEE'S.,performance of services required to be performed under this grant contract. L. No Oblifzation to Renew Neither the. STATE nor the GRANTEE has an obligation to renew this grant contract. XVI. APPLICABILITY TO INDIVIDUAL GRANT PROJECTS Unless otherwise specified in the individual grant project agreement, clauses II and IV through XV of this master grant contract shall apply to all project agreements entered into between the STATE and the GRANTEE between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2013, inclusive. Master Grant.Contract # 12- 700 -00078 Page 7 between the Minnesota Department of Health and City of Edina CHB 01/2008 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this master grant contract to be duly executed intending to be bound thereby. APPROVED: 1. GRANTEE: GRANTEE certifies that the appropriate person(s) have executed this master grant contract on behalf of the GRANTEE as required by applicable articles, by -laws, resolutions, or ordinances. By (authorized signature) Title: Date: By (authorized signature) Title: Date Master Grant Contract # 12- 700 -00078 between the Minnesota Department of Health and City of Edina CHB 2. STATE AGENCY: Master grant contract approval as required by Minnesota Statutes §§16A.15 and 16C.05. By (authorized signature) Title: Date: Page 8 01/2008 oe H�v 10 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item #. V.D. From: Sherry Engelman, R.S. Consent z City Sanitarian Information Only ❑ Date: August 19, 2008 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Resolution No. 2008 -77 Action ® Motion Calling Special Assessment ❑ Resolution Hearing For Garbage and E] Ordinance Refuse Removal ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Approve Resolution No. 2008 -77 Calling a Special Assessment Hearing For Garbage and Refuse Removal. Info /Background: Due to lack of response by the property owners to remove garbage and refuse from their property, staff arranged for such removal to eliminate the public health nuisances. Costs to the City as listed below include removal, staff involvement and the $30 administrative fee. • 6308 Wilryan Ave $ 4,315.74 • 7631 Edinborough Way, #5218 $ 8,107.57 Total Assessment: $12,423.31 The property owners were billed however payment has not been submitted. Staff recommends scheduling the Special Assessment Hearing for September 16, 2008. RESOLUTION NO. 2008 -77 CALLING PUBLIC HEARING 7631 EDINBOROUGH WAY, #5218 and 6308 WILRYAN AVENUE REFUSE REMOVAL NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF EDINA, MINNESOTA, that a public hearing shall be held on the 16th day of September, 2008, in the Council Chambers at City Hall at 7:00 p.m. to consider Refuse Removal Projects REM -08 and REML -08. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvements as required by law. Attest: ADOPTED this 19th day of August, 2008. Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN)SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 19, 2008 and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of 120 City Clerk i� owe A g .40 lie lase REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item V.E. Consent From: Solvei Wilmot Assistant Sanitarian Information Only ❑ Date: August 19, 2008 Mgr. Recommends To HRA ® To Council Subject: One year Extension of the City Facilities Refuse and Recycling Collection Action ® Motion Contract with Aspen Waste Resolution ❑ Ordinance 11 Discussion Recommendation: Extend the contract with Aspen Waste Systems for refuse and recycling collection service for City owned facilities with a 2.9% increase to the overall monthly charges. Information/Back ogr und: The City of Edina currently has a contract with Aspen Waste Systems to collect and handle the recycling and refuse from 19 City owned facilities. The current contract was for two years, 2007 and 2008, with an option to extend one more year with council approval. Aspen has submitted an interest to extend the contract through 2009 with a 2.9 % increase for disposal. Aspen has provided excellent service and has responded to the need for changes in collection. Current monthly rate is $26,229 and the proposed increase would be $26,990. Attachments: letter from Aspen Waste Systems; list of City facilities. August 7, 2008 Solvei Wilmot, RS Edina Health Department City of Edina 4801 West 50" Street Edina, MN 55424 RE: Contract Extension Dear Solvei, Thank you for allowing Aspen Waste Systems, Inc. to provide service to the City of Edina for the past two years. It has been our privilege to partner with you. It is with pleasure we agree to a one year extension of your current contract, with a 2.9% overall increase on alLregular monthly charges. This increase would take effect January 1, 2009. Please feel free to contact me should you have any additional questions or if I may be of further service. We appreciate your business! Sinc Y, om Heuer Director of Business Development -,9--1 Weeb P. venue S.E. - _.;2) 8B4 -8033 `hX(5t ?1884 -80"0 City of Edina Facilities Refuse and Recycling Collection Service 2008 Edina City Hall Edina Art Center Edina Public Works Edina Fire Station #1 Edina Fire Station #2 Braemar Ice Arena Courtney Baseball Fields Edina Golf Dome Braemar Golf Maintenance Building Braemar Club House Kenneth Rosland Park Edina Senior Center & Library Edina Aquatic Center Edinborough Park Grandview Liquor Store Edina Liquor Store 59th & France Liquor Store Van V alkenburg Park Fred Richards Golf Course 4801 W. 50th Street 4701 W. 64th Street 5146 Eden Avenue 6250 Tracy Avenue 7335 York Avenue 7501 S. Highway 169 Braemar Blvd & Valley View Rd 7420 Braemar Blvd 7400 Braemar Blvd 6364 John Harris Drive 66th & Valley View 5280 Grandview Square 4301 West 66th Street 7700 York Ave S. 5013 Vernon Ave S 6755 York Avenue 3943 West 50th Street 4935 Lincoln Drive 7640 Parklawn Ave i; Q REPORURECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council From: Wayne D. Houle, PE City Engineer Date: August 19, 2008 Subject: Resolution for Agency Agreement Between Department of Transportation and City of Edina for Participation in Preliminary Engineering of Safe Routes to School Recommendation: Agenda Item #—V. F. Consent Information Only ❑ Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Action ® Motion ® Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion If the Council determines the agreement appropriate, Council shall adopt resolution 2008 -79 accepting the MnDOT grant. Info /Background: The Minnesota Department of Transportation has awarded the City of Edina a grant of $24,640 to retain a consultant for the development of safe routes to schools within the City of Edina. The study will provide the necessary engineering analysis to reduce the speed limits adjacent to all schools within Edina. The study will also include an educational component of both students and the general public of Edina. G:\ Engineering \Infrastructure \Streets \Sidewalks n Bikeways \Safe Route to School\2007 Successful Application \20080819_RR_2008- 79.doc RESOLUTION NO. 2008-79 STATE OF MINNESOTA AGENCY AGREEMENT BETWEEN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND CITY OF EDINA A RESOLUITON FOR FEDERAL PARTICIPATION IN PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR S.P. 120 - 591 -01; M.P. SRTS 2708(070) BE IT RESOLVED, that pursuant to Minnesota Stat. Sec. 161.36, the Commissioner of Transportation be appointed as Agent of the City of Edina to accept as its agent, federal aid funds which may be made available for eligible transportation related projects. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Mayor and City Engineer are hereby authorized and directed for and behalf of the City to execute and enter into an agreement with the Commissioner of Transportation prescribing the terms and conditions of said federal aid participation as set forth and contained in "Minnesota Department of Transportation Agency Agreement No. 93222," a copy of which said agreement was before the City Council and which is made a part hereof by reference. Passed and adopted this 19th day of August, 2008. ATTEST: Debra A. Mangen, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) SS CITY OF EDINA ) James B. Hovland, Mayor • CERTIFICATE OF CITY CLERK I, the undersigned duly appointed and acting City Clerk for the City of Edina do hereby certify that the attached and foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Edina City Council at its Regular Meeting of August 19, 2008, and as recorded in the Minutes of said Regular Meeting. WITNESS my hand and seal of said City this day of , 20, City Clerk Mn/DOT Agreement No. 93222 STATE OF MINNESOTA AGENCY AGREEMENT BETWEEN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND CITY OF EDINA FOR FEDERAL PARTICIPATION IN PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING FOR S.P. 120 - 591 -01; M.P. SRTS 2708 (070) This agreement is entered into by and between City of Edina ( "City ") and the State of Minnesota acting through its Commissioner of Transportation ( "Mn/DOT "), Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 161.36, the City desires Mn/DOT to act as the City's agent in accepting federal funds on the City's behalf for the construction, improvement, or enhancement of transportation financed either in whole or in part by federal funds, hereinafter referred to as the "Project "; and The City is proposing a federal aid project to develop safe routes to schools plan; and The Preliminary Engineering is eligible for the expenditure of federal aid funds, and is identified in Mn/DOT records as State Project 120 - 591 -01, and in Federal Highway Administration ( "FHWA ") records as Minnesota Project SRTS 2708 (070); and Mn/DOT requires that the terms and conditions of this agency be set forth in an agreement. THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: I. DUTIES OF THE CITY. A. DESIGNATION. The City designates Mn/DOT to 'act as its agent in accepting federal funds in its behalf made available for the Project. B. ELIGIBILITY / COSTS. The estimated cost of the Preliminary Engineering is $30,800. 1. It is anticipated that 80% (up to $ 24,640) of the cost of the Preliminary Engineering is to be paid from federal funds made available by the FHWA, and that the remaining 20% shall be paid by the City. The City will pay any part of the cost or expense of the work that the FHWA does not pay. 2. Any costs incurred by the City prior to authorization of the Federal Funds, will not be eligible for federal participation. (Mn /DOT Agreement No. 93222) Page 1 s . 3. Eligible cost and expense, if approved, may consist of the following: a) The cost of conducting study to help implement safe routes to school programs. b) The direct labor charges for City employees for the time that said employees are performing work pursuant to this agreement must be documented in a Public Interest Finding and approved by the FHWA. Said labor charges may include the prorata share of "labor additives" applicable to said labor charges. Costs to the City of "labor additives" consisting of holiday pay, vacation, sick leave, retirement, pension, unemployment taxes, compensation and liability insurance, lost time charges and similar costs incidental to labor employment will be reimbursed only when supported by adequate records. c) The applicable equipment rental charges for City owned equipment used by the City and mileage charges for employee owned vehicles used by the City on work performed pursuant to this agreement, at rates reflective of the City actual cost. d) Expenditures for materials, supplies, mechanical data processing and equipment rental, limited to the actual expenditures for the purposes of this agreement. e) The cost incurred by the City to employ outside forces to perform any or all of the work pursuant to this agreement, subject to the provisions of section I.D. SUBLETTING. 4. Expenditures for general administration, supervision, maintenance and other overhead or incidental expenses of the City are not eligible for federal participation. 5. Acceptability of costs under this agreement will be determined in accordance with the cost principles and procedures set forth in the applicable Federal Acquisition Regulations, Contract Cost Principals and Procedures, 48 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 31 which is hereby incorporated by reference and made a part of this agreement. 6. For costs expected to exceed $ 30,800, the City must request the preparation and execution of a supplement to this agreement, prior to incurring such costs. C. STAFFING. The City will designate a publicly employed registered engineer, ( "Project Engineer "), to be in responsible charge of the Project and to supervise and direct the work performed under any contract let for the Project. If City elects to use a private consultant for engineering services, the City will provide a qualified, full- time public employee of the City, to be in responsible charge of the Project. The services of the City to be performed pursuant to this agreement may not be (Mn /DOT Agreement No. 93222) Page 2 assigned, sublet, or transferred unless the City is notified in writing by Mn/DOT that such action is permitted under 23 CFR 133 and 23 CFR 635.105 and state law. This written consent will in no way relieve the City from its primary responsibility for performance of the work. 2. During the progress of the work on the Project, the City authorizes its Project Engineer to request in writing specific engineering and/or technical services from Mn/DOT, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 161.39. Such services may be covered by other technical service agreements. If Mn/DOT furnishes the services requested, and if Mn/DOT requests reimbursement, then the City will promptly pay Mn/DOT to reimburse the state trunk highway fund for the full cost and expense of furnishing such services. The costs and expenses will include the current Mn/DOT labor additives and overhead rates, subject to adjustment based on actual direct costs that have been verified by audit. Provision of such services will not be deemed to make Mn/DOT a principal or co- principal with respect to the Project. 3. The City will furnish the personnel, services, supplies, and equipment necessary to properly supervise, inspect, and document the work for the Project. D. SUBLETTING. The City will prepare request for proposals in accordance with Minnesota law and applicable Federal laws and regulations. 1. The City will solicit proposals for Preliminary Engineering after obtaining written notification from Mn/DOT that the FHWA has authorized the Project. Any Project advertised prior to authorization will not be eligible for federal reimbursement. 2. The City will prepare the request for proposal, which will include all of the federal-aid provisions supplied by Mn/DOT. 3. The City will prepare and publish the proposals solicitation for the Project as required by state and federal laws. The City will include in the solicitation the required language for federal-aid contracts as supplied by Mn/DOT. The solicitation will state where the City will receive the sealed proposals. 4. The City may not include other work in the contract for the authorized Project without obtaining prior notification from Mn/DOT that such work is allowed by FHWA. Failure to obtain such notification may result in the loss of some or all of the federal funds for the Project. 5. The City will prepare proposal packages and prepare and distribute any addendums, if needed. 6. The City will receive open, and evaluate proposals. 7. After the proposals are opened, the City will consider the proposals begin negotiations on the price of the Preliminary Engineering in accordance with the practice commonly known as Quality Based Selection. If the proposal contains a (Mn /DOT Agreement No. 93222) Page 3 goal for Disadvantaged Business Enterprises, the City will not award the bid until it has received certification of the Disadvantaged Business Enterprise participation from the Mn/DOT Equal Employment Opportunity Office. 8. This written consent will in no way relieve the City from its primary responsibility for performance of the work. Subcontractor agreements must contain all appropriate terms and conditions of this agreement. E. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. 1. The City will request approval from Mn/DOT for all costs in excess of the amount of federal funds previously approved for the Project prior to incurring such costs. Failure to obtain such approval may result in such costs being disallowed for reimbursement. 2. The City will prepare reports, keep records, and perform work so as to enable Mn/DOT to collect the federal aid sought by the City. The City will retain all records and reports in accordance with Mn/DOT's record retention schedule for federal aid projects. 3. Upon completion of the Project, the Project Engineer will determine whether the work will be accepted. F. PAYMENTS. 1. The entire cost of the Project is to be paid from federal funds made available by the FHWA and by other funds provided by the City. The City will pay any part of the cost or expense of the Project that is not paid by federal funds. 2. The City may request partial payments not more than once each thirty (30) days. The Project Engineer will certify each partial payment. 3. The invoice and supplements thereto, will contain all details that may be necessary for a proper audit. Such details will consist of at least the following: (a) A breakdown of labor by individual, classification, dates and hours worked times the applicable rate to arrive at a total dollar amount for each individual. (b) The labor additive shall be applied to total labor dollars. (c) The equipment charges shall be broken down by type of equipment times the applicable rate and dates used to arrive at total equipment charges. (d) A detailed breakdown of outside services used and supporting invoices and documentation that costs of outside services have been paid. (Mn /DOT Agreement No. 93222) Page 4 (e) Detail for materials, supplies, and other items with the description, units, and unit prices included in the invoice. If materials or supplies are purchased from an outside source, a copy of that invoice should be included. (f) The invoices will include 100% of eligible charges applicable to the Preliminary Engineering so that the prorata share of federal and City participation can be applied to the total costs. 4. Following certification of the final estimate, the City may request reimbursement for costs eligible for federal funds. The City's request will be made to Mn/DOT and will include a copy of the certified final estimate along with the required records. 5. Reimbursement of costs under this agreement will be based on actual costs. G.. LIMITATIONS. 1. The City will comply with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, ordinances, and regulations. 2. Nondiscrimination. It is the policy of the FHWA and the State of Minnesota that no person in the United States will, on the grounds of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance (42 U.S.C. 2000d). Through expansion of the mandate for nondiscrimination in Title VI and through parallel legislation, the prescribed bases of discrimination include race, color, sex, national origin, age, and disability. In addition, the Title VI program has been extended to cover all programs, activities and services of an entity receiving Federal financial assistance,. whether such programs and activities are Federally assisted or not. Even in the absence of prior discriminatory practice or usage, a recipient in administering a program or activity to which this part applies, is expected to take affirmative action to assure that no person is excluded from participation in, or is denied the benefits of, the program or activity on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability. It is the responsibility of the City to carry out the above requirements.. 3. Workers' Compensation. Any and all employees of the City or other persons while engaged in the performance of any work or services required or permitted by the City under this agreement will not be considered employees of Mn/DOT, and any and all claims that may arise under the Workers' Compensation Act of Minnesota on behalf of said employees, or other persons while so engaged, will in no way be the obligation or responsibility of Mn/DOT. The City will require proof of Workers' Compensation Insurance from any contractor and sub- contractor. H. AUDIT. (Mn /DOT Agreement No. 93222) Page 5 1. The City will comply with the Single Audit Act of 1984 and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) circular A -133 including amendments and successors thereto, which are Incorporated herein by reference. 2. As provided under Minnesota Statutes Section 16C.05, subdivision 5, all books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of the City are subject to examination by the United States Government, Mn/DOT, and either the Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor as appropriate, for a minimum of six years. The City will be responsible for any costs associated with the performance of the audit. I. MAINTENANCE. The City assumes full responsibility for the operation and maintenance of any facility constructed or improved under this Agreement. J. CLAIMS. The City acknowledges that Mn/DOT is acting only as the City's. agent for acceptance and disbursement of federal funds, and not as a principal or co- principal with respect to the project. The City will pay any and all lawful claims arising out of or incidental to the Project including, without limitation, claims related to contractor selection (including the solicitation, evaluation, and acceptance or rejection of bids or proposals), acts or omissions in performing the Project work, and any ultra vires acts. The City will indemnify, defend (to the extent permitted by the Minnesota Attorney General), and hold Mn/DOT harmless from any claims or costs arising out of or incidental to the Project, including reasonable attorney fees incurred by Mn/DOT. The City's indemnification obligation extends to any actions related to the certification of DBE participation, even if such actions are recommended by Mn/DOT. II. DUTIES OF Mn/DOT. A. ACCEPTANCE. Mn/DOT accepts designation as Agent of the City for the receipt and disbursement of federal funds and will.act in accordance herewith. B. PROJECT ACTIVITIES. 1. Mn/DOT will make the necessary requests to the FHWA for authorization to use federal funds for the Project, and for reimbursement of eligible costs pursuant to the terms of this agreement. 2. Mn/DOT will provide to the City copies of the required Federal -aid clauses to be included in the proposal solicitation and will provide the required Federal -aid provisions to be included in the Proposal. 3. Mn/DOT will review and certify the DBE participation and notify the City when certification is complete. If certification of DBE participation cannot be obtained, then the City must decide whether to proceed with awarding the contract. Failure to obtain such certification will result in the project becoming ineligible for federal assistance, and the City must make up any shortfall. C. PAYMENTS. (Mn /DOT Agreement No. 93222) Page 6 1. Mn/DOT will receive the federal funds ' paid by the FHWA for the Project, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes § 161.36, Subdivision 2. 2. Mn/DOT will review and certify each partial pay request. Following certification of the partial estimate, Mn/DOT will reimburse the City, from said federal funds made available to the Project, for each partial payment request, subject to the availability and limits of those funds. 3. Upon completion of the Project, the City will prepare a final payment request in accordance with the terms of this agreement. Mn/DOT will review and certify the final payment request with a final audit. 4. No more than 90% of the reimbursement due under this agreement will be paid until completion of the final audit and approval by Mn/DOT's authorized representative. 5. If Mn/DOT does not obtain funding from the FHWA or other funding source, or funding cannot be continued at a sufficient level to allow for the processing of the federal aid reimbursement requests, the City may continue the work with local funds only, until such time as Mn/DOT is able to process the federal aid reimbursement requests. D. AUTHORITY. Mn/DOT may withhold federal funds, if Mn/DOT or the FHWA determines that the Project was not completed in compliance with federal requirements. E. INSPECTION. Mn/DOT, the FHWA, or duly authorized representatives of the state and federal government will have the right to audit, evaluate and monitor the work performed under this agreement. The City will make available all books, records, and documents pertaining to the work hereunder, for a minimum of seven years following the closing of the construction contract. III. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES. Each authorized representative will have responsibility to administer this agreement and to ensure that all payments due to the other party are paid pursuant to the terms of this agreement. A. The City authorized representative is Wayne Houle, City Engineer, City of Edina, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina, MN 55424, phone 952- 826 -0443, or his successor. B. Mn/DOT's authorized representative is Lynnette Roshell, Minnesota Department of Transportation, State Aid for Local Transportation, 395 John Ireland Boulevard, Mail Stop 500, St Paul, MN 55155, phone 651- 366 -3822, or her successor. IV. TORT LIABILITY. Each party is responsible for its own acts and omissions and the results thereof to the extent authorized by law and will not be responsible for the acts and omissions of any others and the results thereof. The Minnesota Tort Claims Act, Minnesota Statutes Section 3.736, governs Mn/DOT liability. (Mn /DOT Agreement No. 93222) Page 7 V. ASSIGNMENT. Neither party will assign or transfer any rights or obligations under this agreement without prior written approval of the other party. VI. AMENDMENTS. Any amendments /supplements to this Agreement must be in writing and be executed by the same parties who executed the original agreement, or their successors in office. VII. TERM OF AGREEMENT. This agreement will be effective upon execution by the City and by appropriate State officials, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 16C.05, and will remain in effect for five (5) years from the effective 'date or until all obligations set forth in this agreement have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever occurs first. VIII. TERMINATION. This agreement may be terminated by the City or Mn/DOT at any time, with or without cause, upon ninety (90) days written notice to the other party. Such termination will not remove any unfulfilled financial obligations of the City as set forth in this Agreement. In the event of such a termination the City will be entitled to reimbursement for Mn/DOT- approved federally eligible expenses incurred for work satisfactorily performed on the Project to the date of termination subject to the terms of this agreement. (Mn /DOT Agreement No. 93222) Page 8 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed intending to be bound thereby. CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION City certifies that the appropriate person(s) By: have executed the contract on its behalf as required Title: Director by applicable resolutions, ordinances, or charter State Aid for Local Transportation provisions Date: By: Date: COMMISSIONER OF ADMINISTRATION Bw- Tide: , Date: By: Date: Title:. (Mn /DOT Agreement No. 93222) Page 9 REPORT /RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item # V. G. From: Wayne D. Houle, PE Consent City Engineer Information Only ❑ Date: August 19, 2008 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Final Development Plan Action ® Motion Agreement for 3101 and 3201 West 69th Street ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Recommendation: Review attached Final Development Plan Agreement for 3101 and 3201 West 69th Street, and authorize Mayor and Manager to sign. Info /Background: As a condition of the Final Development Plan for this project the developer is require to enter into a Final Development Plan Agreement for the above project. Our City Attorney - Roger Knutson has prepared the attached agreement. Staff recommends that you authorize the Mayor and Manager to sign said agreement. G: \Engineering \General \60 - 69 Streets \3101 West 69th Street DevelopementTinal Approvals\20080819 final developement plan agreement rrform.doc V.G- (reservedfor recording information) FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AGREEMENT 3101 AND 3201 WEST 69TH STREET AGREEMENT dated , 2008, by and between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota .municipal corporation ( "City "), and YORK PLACE WEST, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, and YORK PLACE EAST, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (hereinafter collectively the "Developer") 1. REQUEST FOR FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL. The Developer has asked the City to approve a Final Development Plan for 3101 and 3201 West 69th Street (referred to in this Contract as the "Final Plan "). The land is situated in the County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota, and is legally described on the attached Exhibit "A" ( "Subject Property ") 2. CONDITIONS OF FINAL PLAN APPROVAL. The City hereby approves the Final Plan on condition that the Developer enter into this Contract, furnish the security required by it, and record the Final Plan with the County Recorder or Registrar of Titles.. 3. RIGHT TO PROCEED. On the Subject Property the Developer may not grade or otherwise disturb the earth, remove trees, construct , public or private improvements, or any buildings until all the following conditions have been satisfied: 1) this agreement has been fully executed by both parties and filed with the City Clerk, 2) the necessary security has been received by the City, 3) the Final Plan has 14054603 1 Edina: 3101 & 3201 West 69`h Street RNK:r08 /15/2008 (York Place West. LLC & York Place East. LLC) been recorded with the Hennepin County Recorder's Office, and 4) the City's Public Works Director has issued a letter that all conditions have been satisfied and that the Developer may proceed. -The City acknowledges that a footings and foundation work is underway and that this paragraph does not apply to such work. 4. DEVELOPMENT PLANS. The Final Plan shall be developed in accordance with City Resolution 2008 -55, the approved Conditional Use Permit and approved Variance and the following plans. The plans shall not be attached to this Contract. If the plans vary from the written terms of this Contract, the written terms shall control. The plans are: Plan A - Site Plan dated June 9, 2008 Plan B - Grading Plan dated April 28, 2008 Plan C - Building elevations dated April 28 and June 9th 2008 Plan D - Roof plan dated June 91h, 2008 Plan E - Landscape Plan dated June 91h 2008 Plan F - Plans and Specifications for Public Improvements and erosion control plan 5. IMPROVEMENTS. Developer shall install and pay for the following improvements: A. Watermain including laterals or extensions and all necessary building services such as hydrants, valves and other appurtenances. B. Sanitary sewer C. Turn lanes on West 69th Street from York Avenue to midpoint of Subject Property including traffic control signage. D. Landscaping The improvements shall be installed in accordance with the City's engineering guidelines. The Developer shall submit plans and specifications which have been prepared by a competent registered professional engineer to the City for approval by the City Engineer. The Developer shall instruct its engineer to provide adequate field inspection personnel to assure an acceptable level of quality control to the extent that the Developer's engineer will be able to certify that the construction work meets the approved City standards as a condition of City acceptance. In addition, the City may, at the City's discretion, have one or more City 140546v03 2 Edina: 3101 & 3201 West 69`h Street RNK:r08/15/2008 (York Place West, LLC & York Place East; LLC) inspectors and a soil engineer inspect the work on a full or part-time basis. The Developer, its contractors and subcontractors, shall follow all instructions received from the City's inspectors. The Developer's engineer shall provide for on -site project management. The Developer's engineer is responsible for design changes and contract administration between the Developer and the Developer's contractor. The Developer or his engineer shall schedule a pre- construction meeting at a mutually agreeable time at the City Hall with all parties concerned, including the City staff, to review the program for the construction work. All labor and work shall be done and performed in the best and most workmanlike manner and in strict conformance with the approved plans and specifications. No deviations from the approved plans and specifications will be permitted unless approved in writing by the City Engineer. The Developer agrees to furnish to the City a list of contractors being considered for retention by the Developer for the performance of the work required by the Contract. The Developer shall not do any work or furnish any materials not covered by the plans and specifications and special conditions of this Contract, unless such work is first approved in writing by the City Engineer. 6. CITY ENGINEERING ADMINISTRATION AND CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATION. The Developer shall pay a fee for in -house engineering administration. City engineering administration will include staking of public improvements monitoring of construction observation, consultation with Developer and his engineer on status or problems regarding the project, coordination for testing, final inspection and acceptance, project monitoring during the warranty period, and processing of requests for reduction in security. Fees for this service shall be $5,915. 7. CONTRACTORS /SUBCONTRACTORS. City Council members, City employees, and City Planning Commission members, and corporations, partnerships, and other entities in which such individuals have greater than a 25% ownership interest or in which they are an officer or director may not act as contractors or subcontractors for the public improvements identified in Paragraph 8 above. 8. PERMITS. The Developer shall obtain or require its contractors and subcontractors to obtain all necessary permits, including but not limited to: 14054603 3 Edina: 3101 & 3201 West 69`h Street RNK:r08 /15/2008 (York Place West_ LLC & York Place East LLC) • Hennepin County for County Road Access and Work in County Rights -of -Way • MnDot for State Highway Access and Drainage • Minnesota Department of Health for Watermains • NPDES Permits • MPCA for Sanitary Sewer and Hazardous Material Removal and Disposal • DNR for Dewatering and Work in Protected Waters • City of Edina for Building Permits • MCES for Sanitary Sewer Connections • Watershed Permits 9. TIME OF PERFORMANCE. The Developer shall install all required public improvements by June 30, 2009. The Developer may, however, request an extension of time from the City. If an extension is granted, it shall be conditioned upon updating the security posted by the Developer to reflect cost increases and the extended completion date. Final wear course placement outside of this time frame must have the written approval of the City Engineer. 10. LICENSE. The Developer hereby grants the City, its agents, employees, officers and contractors a license to enter the Final Plan to perform all work and inspections deemed appropriate by the City in conjunction with Final Plan development. 11. EROSION CONTROL. Prior to initiating site grading, the erosion control plan shall be implemented by the Developer and inspected and approved by the City. Erosion control practices must comply with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Best Management Practices. The City may impose additional erosion control requirements if they would be beneficial. All areas disturbed by the excavation and backfilling operations shall be reseeded within 48 hours after the completion of the work or in an area that is inactive for more than five (5) days unless authorized and approved by the City Engineer in writing. Except as otherwise provided in the erosion control plan, seed shall be in accordance with the City's current seeding specification. All seeded areas shall be fertilized, mulched, and disc anchored as necessary for seed retention. The parties recognize that time is of the essence in controlling erosion. If the Developer does not comply with the erosion control plan and schedule or supplementary instructions received from the City, the City may take such action as it deems appropriate to control erosion. The City will endeavor to notify the Developer in advance of any proposed action, but failure of the City to do so will 14054603 4 Edina: 3101 & 3201 West 69'h Street RNK:r08 /15/2008 (York Place West LLC & York Place East LLC) not affect the Developer's and City's rights or obligations hereunder. If the Developer does not reimburse the City for any cost the City incurred for such work within ten (10) days, the City may draw down the security to pay any costs. No development, utility or street construction will be allowed and no building permits will be issued unless the Final Plan is in full compliance with the approved erosion control plan. 12. STREET MAINTENANCE DURING CONSTRUCTION. The Developer shall be responsible for all street maintenance during construction on West 69th street until the street is accepted by the City. Warning signs shall be placed when hazards develop in street to prevent the public from traveling on same and to direct attention to detours. If and when the street becomes impassable, the street shall be barricaded and closed. The Developer shall be responsible for keeping the street within and without the project area clean of dirt and debris that may spill, track, or wash onto the street from Developer's operation. The Developer may request, in writing, that the City keep the street open during the winter months by plowing snow from the street prior to final acceptance of said streets. The City shall not be responsible for repairing the street because of snow plowing operations. Providing snow plowing service does not constitute final acceptance of the streets by the City. The Developer shall contract for street cleaning within and immediately adjacent to the project. At a minimum, scraping and sweeping shall take place on a weekly basis. A copy of this contract shall be approved by the City before grading is started. The contract shall provide that the City may direct the contractor to clean the street and bill the Developer. 13. OWNERSHIP OF IMPROVEMENTS. Upon completion of the work and construction required by this Contract, the improvements lying within public easements shall become City property. 14. BUILDING PERMITS /CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY. A. Breach of the terms of this Contract by the Developer, including nonpayment of billings from the City, shall be grounds for denial of building permits, including lots sold to third parties, and the halting of all work in the Final Plan. 14054603 5 Edina: 3101 & 3201 West 69th Street RNK:r08 /15/2008 (York Place West, LLC & York Place East_ LLC) B. If building permits are issued prior to the acceptance of public improvements, the Developer assumes all liability and costs resulting in delays in completion of public improvements and damage to public improvements caused by the City, Developer, their contractors, subcontractors, materialmen, employees, agents, or third parties. No sewer and water connection permits may be issued until the streets needed for access have been paved with a bituminous surface and the utilities are tested and approved by the City Engineer. 15. RESPONSIBILITY FOR COSTS. A. Except as otherwise specified herein, the Developer shall pay all costs incurred by it or the City in conjunction with the development of the Final Plan, including but not limited to legal and planning, (excluding engineering and inspection expenses) incurred in connection with approval and acceptance of the Final Plan and the preparation of this Agreement, not to exceed $10,000. B. The Developer shall hold the City and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from claims made by itself and third parties for damages sustained or costs incurred resulting from Final Plan approval and development. The Developer shall indemnify the City and its officers, employees, and agents for all costs, damages, or expenses which the City may pay or incur in consequence of such claims, including attorneys' fees. Contract, C. The Developer shall reimburse the City for costs incurred in the enforcement of this D. The Developer shall pay in full all bills submitted to it by the City for obligations incurred under this Contract within thirty (30) days after receipt. Bills not paid within thirty (30) days shall accrue interest at the rate of eight percent (8 %) per year. E. In addition to the charges and special assessments referred to herein, other charges may be imposed such as but not limited to the Metropolitan sewer availability charges ( "SAC "), and building permit fees. F. Because the Developer is installing and paying for sewer and water laterals, City sewer and water connection charges are not required 14054603 6 Edina: 3101 & 3201 West 69'" Street RNK:r08 /15/2008 (York Place West, LLC & York Place East, LLC) 16. SPECIAL PROVISIONS. The following special provisions shall apply to Final Plan development: 2008. A. Compliance with the conditions in the City Engineer's memorandum dated May 22, B. Compliance with the conditions required by the City's Transportation Commission. C. All storm water must be treated on -site before it leaves the Subject Property. D. Two surface parking spaces in front of the apartments must be eliminated to meet the required parking space setback from West 69th Street. E. Bike storage must be provided to meet City Code. F. No drive - through window access is allowed for the retail buildings. F. Fifty percent (50 %) or more of the retail users in the building that faces York Avenue must have doors that have public access openings to the street. G. The project will be built according to the final plans and specifications and with materials as presented at the June 17, 2008 Edina City Council meeting 17. MISCELLANEOUS. A. The Developer may not assign this Contract without the written permission of the City Council. The Developer's obligation hereunder shall continue in full force and effect even if the Developer sells one or more lots, the entire Final Plan, or any part of it. B. Developer shall take out and maintain or cause to be taken out and maintained until the City has accepted the public improvements, public liability and property damage insurance covering personal injury, including death, and claims for property damage which may arise out of Developer's work or the work of its subcontractors or by one directly or indirectly employed by any of them. Limits for bodily injury and death shall be not less than $500,000 for one person and $1,000,000 for each occurrence; limits for property damage shall be not less than $200,000 for each occurrence; or a combination single limit 140546v03 7 Edina: 3101 & 3201 West 691h Street RNK:r08 /15/2008 (York Place West. LLC & York Place East_ LLC) policy of $1,000,000 or more. The City shall be named as an additional insured on the policy, and the Developer shall file with the City a certificate evidencing coverage prior to the City signing the Final Plan. The certificate shall provide that the City must be given thirty (30) days advance written notice of the cancellation of the insurance. C. Third parties shall have no recourse against the City under this Contract. D. If any portion, section, subsection, sentence, clause, paragraph, or phrase of this Contract is for any reason held invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Contract. E. The action or inaction of the City shall not constitute a waiver or amendment to the provisions of this Contract. To be binding, amendments or waivers shall be in writing, signed by the parties and approved by written resolution of the City Council. The City's failure to promptly take legal action to enforce this Contract shall not be a waiver or release. F. This Contract shall run with the land and may be recorded against the title to the property. The Developer covenants with the City, its successors and assigns, that the Developer has fee title to the Subject Property; that there are no unrecorded interests in the Subject Property; and that the Developer will indemnify and hold the City harmless for any breach of the foregoing covenants. G. Each right, power or remedy herein conferred upon the City is cumulative and in addition to every other right, power or remedy, express or implied, now or hereafter arising, available to City, at law or in equity, or under any other agreement, and each and every right, power and remedy herein set forth or otherwise so existing may be exercised from time to time as often and in such order as may be deemed expedient by the City and shall not be a waiver of the right to exercise at any time thereafter any other right, power or remedy. H. The Developer represents to the City that the Final Plan complies with all Cities, county, metropolitan, state, and federal laws and regulations, including but not limited to: subdivision ordinances, zoning ordinances, and environmental regulations. If the City determines that the Final Plan does not comply, the City may, at its option, refuse to allow construction or development work in the Final 140546v03 8 Edina: 3101 & 3201 West 691h Street RNK:r08 /15/2008 (York Place West LLC & York Place East LLC) Plan until the Developer does comply. Upon the City's demand, the Developer shall cease work until there is compliance. 18. DEVELOPER'S DEFAULT. In the event of default by the Developer as to any of the work to be performed by it hereunder, the City may, at its option, perform the work and the Developer shall promptly reimburse the City for any expense incurred by the City, provided the Developer, except in an emergency as determined by the City, is first given notice of the work in default, not less than forty -eight (48) hours in advance. This Contract is a license for the City to act, and it shall not be necessary for the City to seek a Court order for permission to enter the land. When the City does any such work, the City may, in addition to its other remedies, assess the cost in whole or in part. 19. WARRANTY. The Developer warrants all improvements required to be constructed by it pursuant to this Contract against poor material and faulty workmanship. The Developer shall submit either 1) a warranty /maintenance bond for 100% of the cost of the improvement, or 2) a letter of credit for twenty- five percent (25 %) of the amount of the original cost of the improvements. A. The required warranty period for materials and workmanship for the utility contractor installing public sewer and water mains shall be two (2) years from the date of final written City acceptance of the work. B. The required warranty period for all work relating to the turn lanes construction shall be subject to one (1) year from the date of final written acceptance, unless the wearing course is placed during the same construction season as the bituminous base course. In those instances, the Developer shall guarantee all work, including street construction, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalks and trails, material and equipment for a period of two (2) years from the date of final written City acceptance of the work. C following installation. 140546v03 RNK:r08 /1 5/2008 The required warranty period for sod, trees, and landscaping is one growing season 9 Edina: 3101 & 3201 West 691h Street (York Place West LLC & York Place East. LLC) 20. SUMMARY OF SECURITY REQUIREMENTS. To guarantee compliance with the terms of this agreement, payment of special assessments, payment of the costs of all public improvements, and construction of all public improvements, the Developer shall furnish the City with a letter of credit, in the form attached hereto, from a bank, cash escrow or a combination cash escrow and Letter of Credit ( "security ") for $151,000. The amount of the security was calculated as follows: CONSTRUCTION COSTS: Turn lanes $ 42,000.00 Sanitary Sewer 20,000.00 Watermain 29,000.00 Erosion Control 10,000.00 Landscaping 50,000.00 TOTAL PROJECT SECURITIES: $ 151,000.00 This breakdown is for historical reference; it is not a restriction on the use of the security. The bank shall be subject to the approval of the City Manager. The City may draw down the security, without notice, for any violation of the terms of this Contract or if the. security is allowed to lapse prior to the end of the required term. If the required public improvements are not completed at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the security, the City may also draw it down. If the security is drawn down, the proceeds shall be used to cure the default. Upon receipt of proof satisfactory to the City Engineer that work has been completed and financial obligations to the City have been satisfied, with City Engineer approval the security may be reduced from time to time by eighty percent (80 %) of the financial obligations that have been satisfied. Twenty percent (20 %) of the amounts .certified by the Developer's engineer shall be retained as security until: (1) all improvements have been completed, (2) iron monuments for lot corners have been installed, (3) all financial obligations to the City satisfied, (4) the required "record" plans have been received by the City, (5) a warranty security is provided, and (6) the public improvements are accepted by the City. 14054603 10 Edina: 3101 & 3201 West 69th Street RNK:r08 /15/2008 (York Place West, LLC & York Place East. LLC) 21. SUMMARY OF CASH REQUIREMENTS. The following is a summary of the cash requirements under this Contract which must be furnished to the City at the time of final Plan approval: Fee in lieu of On -Site Sanitary Sewage Retention System $ 161,591.68 City Engineering Administration 5.915.00 TOTAL.CASH REQUIREMENTS $ 167,506.68 22. NOTICES. Required notices to the Developer shall be in writing, and shall be either hand delivered to the Developer, its employees or agents, or mailed to the Developer by certified mail at the following address: 7760 France Ave. S., Suite 1020, Edina, Minnesota 55435. Notices to the City shall be in writing and shall be either hand delivered to the City Manager, or mailed to the City by certified mail in care of the City Manager at the following address: Edina City Hall, 4801 West 50th Street, Edina Minnesota 55424. CITY OF EDINA BY: AND James Hovland, Mayor Gordon Hughes, City Manager DEVELOPER: YORK PLACE WEST, LLC BY: Its YORK PLACE EAST, LLC BY: Its 14054603 l ] Edina: 3101 & 3201 West 691h Street RNK:r08 /15/2008 (York Place West. LLC & York Place East, LLC) STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2008, by James Hovland and by Gordon Hughes, the Mayor and City Manager of the City of Edina, a Minnesota municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation and pursuant to the authority granted by its City Council NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2008, by the of YORK PLACE WEST, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2008, by the of YORK PLACE EAST, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL, KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, MN 55121 Telephone: (651) 452 -5000 RNK:srn 140546v03 12 Edina: 3101 & 3201 West 69"' Street RNK:r08 /15/2008 (York Place West, LLC & York Place East LLC) FEE OWNER CONSENT TO FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AGREEMENT 69TH STREET PARTNERS, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, fee owner of all or part of the Subject Property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Final Development Plan Agreement, affirms and consents to the provisions thereof and agrees to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the Subject Property owned by it. Dated this day of 2008. 69TH STREET PARTNERS, LLC BY: STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) Its The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2008, by the of 69th Street Partners, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 (651) 452 -5000 RNK:sm 140546v03 13 Edina: 3101 & 3201 West 69th Street RNK:r08/15/2008 (York Place West, LLC & York Place East, LLC) FEE OWNER CONSENT TO FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AGREEMENT YORK AVENUE PARTNERS, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, fee owner of all or part of the Subject Property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Final Development Plan Agreement, affirms and consents to the provisions thereof and agrees to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the Subject Property owned by it. Dated this day of '2008. YORK AVENUE PARTNERS, LLC AN STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) Its The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2008, by the of York Avenue Partners, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 (651) 452 -5000 RNK:sm 140546v03 14 Edina: 3101 & 3201 West 691h Street RNK:r08 /15/2008 (York Place West LLC & York Place East LLC) MORTGAGE CONSENT - TO FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AGREEMENT , which holds a mortgage on the Subject Property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Final Development Plan Agreement, agrees that the Final Development Plan Agreement shall remain in full force and effect even if it forecloses on its mortgage. Dated this day of , 2 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2 , by NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 (651) 452 -5000 RNK:srn 140546v03 15 Edina: 3101 & 3201 West 69th Street RNK:r08 /15/2008 (York Place West, LLC & York Place East, LLC) CONTRACT PURCHASER CONSENT TO FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AGREEMENT , which /who has a contract purchaser's interest in all or part of the Subject Property, the development of which is governed by the foregoing Final Development Plan Agreement, hereby affirms and consents to the provisions thereof and agrees to be bound by the provisions as the same may apply to that portion of the Subject Property in which there is a contract purchaser's interest. Dated this day of 2 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ( ss. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2 , by NOTARY PUBLIC DRAFTED BY: CAMPBELL KNUTSON Professional Association 317 Eagandale Office Center 1380 Corporate Center Curve Eagan, Minnesota 55121 (651) 452 -5000 RNK:sm 14054603 16 Edina: 3101 & 3201 West 69`h Street RNK:r08 /15/2008 (York Place West LLC & York Place East, LLC) EXHIBIT "A" TO FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN AGREEMENT Legal Description of Subject Property 3101 WEST 69TH STREET: Parcel ID No. 29- 028 -24 -34 -0008 That part of Tract M, Registered Land Survey No. 0629, lying North of the South 196 feet thereof and lying East of the West 310 feet thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Torrens Property) 3201 WEST 69TH STREET: Parcel ID No. 29- 028 -24 -34 -0009 That part of the North 200 feet of Tract M, Registered Land Survey No. 0629, lying West of the East 347 feet thereof; ALSO that part of Tract M lying North of the South 196 feet thereof and lying East of the West line .... Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Torrens Property) 14054603 17 Edina: 3101 & 3201 West 691h Street RNK:r08 /15/2008 (York Place West LLC & York Place East. LLC) IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT No. Date: TO: City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, Minnesota 55424 -1394 Dear Sir or Madam: We hereby issue, for the account of (Name of Developer) and in your favor, our Irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of $ , available to you by your draft drawn on sight on the undersigned bank. The draft must: a) Bear the clause, "Drawn under Letter of Credit No. dated 2 , of (Name of Bank) b) Be signed by the Mayor or City Manager of the City of Edina. c) Be presented for payment at (Address of Bank) on or before 4:00 p.m. on November 30, 2 This Letter of Credit shall automatically renew for successive one -year terms unless, at least forty -five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date (which shall be November 30 of each year), the Bank delivers written notice to the City Manager that it intends to modify the terms of, or cancel, this Letter of Credit. Written notice is effective if sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, and deposited in the U.S. Mail, at least forty-five (45) days prior to the next annual renewal date addressed as follows: Edina City Manager, Edina City Hall, 4801 West 501h Street, Edina, MN 55424 -1394, and is actually received by the City Manager at least thirty (30) days prior to the renewal date. This Letter of Credit sets forth in full our understanding which shall not in any way be modified, amended, amplified, or limited by reference to any document, instrument, or agreement, whether or not referred to herein. This Letter of Credit is not assignable. This is not a Notation Letter of Credit. More than one draw may be made under this Letter of Credit. This Letter of Credit shall be governed by the most recent revision of the Uniform Customs and. Practice for Documentary Credits, International Chamber of Commerce Publication No. 600. We hereby agree that a draft drawn under and in compliance with this Letter of Credit shall be duly honored upon presentation. BY: Its 14054603 18 Edina: 3101 & 3201 West 69`h Street RNK:r08/15/2008 (York Place West. LLC & York Place East, LLC) R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 816/2008 7:32:44 Council Check Register Page - 1 8/1/2008 -- 8/7/2008 Check # Dale Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No . Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description - Business Unit '312243 8/1 12008 115346 CALHOUN BEACH FRAMING 20.00 MAT FOR FIRE'STATION 191711 073108 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 668.40 PHOTO CONTEST FRAMES 191711 073108 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 688.40 I 312244 81712008 '102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 63.60 191548 0611210 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 34.56 191722 0611214 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLINGI 106.16 191723 500257- 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLINGI 204.32 i i 312245 817/2008 102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES 359.44 'READY MIX 00005752 191806 4225431 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 610.50 READY MIX 00005752 191807 4225249 1365.6520 CONCRETE SIDEWALKS & PATH MAINTENANCE 359.44 READY MIX 00005752 191808 4225612 5932.6520 CONCRETE GENERAL STORM SEWER 1,329.38 312246 81712008 111229 ALLEGIS CORPORATION 35.35 YOKE ENDS 00001723 191465 S1265608.001 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 35.35 312247 8/712008 103357 ALPHA VIDEO 8 AUDIO INC. 259.03 CAMERA RENTAL-AND TAPES 191603 ALERTINV10489 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 259.03 312248 817 12008: 121421 AMERICAN. ENGINEERING TESTING I 1,868.00 PROJECT TESTING SERVICES 191809 41275 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 1,868.00 ' 312249. 8/7 /2008 102109 ANCOM TECHNICAL CENTER i 247.42 RADIO MAINTENANCE 191810 4130 1400.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 247.42 312250 817/2008 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE - 852.04 FOOD 191604 996948 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 852.04 = 312251 81712008 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 18.60 SPRAYERS 00001874 191466 26107 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 18.60 312252 817, 103680 ARAMARK REFRESHMENT SRVCS R55CKREG LuG20000 CITY O .JA Council Check Register 8/112008 -- 8f7/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 340.40 COFFEE 191513 409708 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 86.91 COFFEE 191605 409693 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GENERAL SUPPLIES 8 16i..- _ , 7:32:44 Page - 2 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLAYGROUND & THEATER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 427.31 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE 312253 81712008 PATHS & HARD SURFACE 101677 ARMCOM DISTRIBUTING CO. 58.39 CEILING TILES 00001876 191467 10025674 1552.6406 58.39 312254 817/2008 122948 ATSI 520.00 CALIBRATION SERVICE 00004378 191468 INV1003874 1330.6215 520.00 312255 817/2008 120517 BEITEL, DAWN 153.42 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 191663 072908 1624.6107 153.42 312256 8/7/2008 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 474.81 191724 5699600 5862.5515 1,018,40 191725 45536500 5842.5512 1,010.96 191726 45531400 5862.5513 1,373.20 191727 45363900 5862.5513 3,877.37 312257 8/7/2008 101191 BENNEROTTE, JENNIFER 298.95 CUTTING CEREMONY RIBBON 191717 073108 1470.6406 298.95 312258 81712008 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 71.24 DESKTOP REFERENCE SET 191469 OE- 165440 -1 1550.6406 21.99 FOOTREST 191470 WO- 517826 -1 1550.6406 80.43 FOOTRESTS 191471 WO- 517831 -1 1550.6406 72.09 PADDED MAILERS 191514 WO- 518342 -1 1550.6406 24.04 DOCUMENT HOLDER 191515 WO- 518380 -1 1550.6406 21.99- RETURN 191516 CP -WO- 517826 -1 1550.6406 146.86 3 -HOLE PUNCHERS 00003175 191606 OE- 164907 -1 1400.6406 394.66 312259 8f7/2008 100653 BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS 24,745.00 EXCAVATION & PAVING -LEWIS PK 00005841 191665 12173 1647.6103 6,125.00 EXCAVATION & PAVING -LEWIS PK 00005841 191666 12172 1647.6103 9,050.00 EXCAVATION & PAVING- COURTNE100001591 191667 12171 1647.6103 344.60 AGGREGATE FOR PATH 00005841 191668 12174 1647.6517 r GENERAL SUPPLIES 8 16i..- _ , 7:32:44 Page - 2 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE CENT SVC PW BUILDING EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLAYGROUND & THEATER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PATHS & HARD SURFACE SAND GRAVEL & ROCK PATHS & HARD SURFACE 312269 81712008. 735.00 191729 79173 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 735.00 100681 CATCO 442.18 VEHICLE PARTS 00001724 191472 3 -56512 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPE -: :N GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/6/2008 7:32:44 Council Check Register Page - 3 8/1/2008 -- 8/7/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 40,264.60 312260 81712008 100711 BLOOD, DAVID 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 191460 080708 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 312261 8/7/2008 100659 BOYER TRUCK PARTS 42.88 SHOCK 00001745 191517 215918 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN i 42.88 312262 8/7/2008 121118 BRUESKE, JEFF 200.00 PERFORMANCE 811,2108 191600 073108 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL'SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 200.00 312263 81712008 104649 BRYAN, BILL 2,475.00, SERVICES AT AQUATIC CENTER 191811 080108 5311.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL OPERATION: 35.86 SUPPLIES REIMBURSEMENT 191812 080408 5311.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 2,510.86 312264 81712008 103244 BURTIS, ROBERT 175.00 PERFORMANCES /14/08 191602 073108 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 175.00 312265 81712008 100776 BUTLER, GEORGE 100.00 POLICE SERVICE . 191459 080708 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 312266 8/7/2008 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 76.90 191549 11980 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 88.25. 191728 11996 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 165.15 312267 817/2008 119860 CAR TRUCK CITY 19,986.30 2008 CHEVROLET TRAILBLAZER 00003083 191886 15269 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT: GENERAL 19,986.30 ' 312268 81712008 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 312269 81712008. 735.00 191729 79173 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 735.00 100681 CATCO 442.18 VEHICLE PARTS 00001724 191472 3 -56512 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPE -: :N GEN R55CKREG LuG20000 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation 442.18 312270 817/2008 159.56 159.56 312271 817/2008 3,158.76 10.12 3,168.88 312272 817/2008 312274 817/2008 312275 81712008 r w CITY O� .4A Council Check Register 8/1/2008 -- 8/7/2008 PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 101515 CEMSTONE PRODUCTS CO. TROWEL, FLOAT, DARBY 00001864 191473 1164007 1301.6556 112561 CENTERPOINT ENERGY 5591458 -4 191474 072208 1551.6186 5590919 -6 191813 07122/08 7413.6582 106402 CHURCHILL, LEE 404.00 OFFICIATING FEES 404.00 122084 CITY OF EDINA - UTILITIES 65.84 00077442- 0112920000 742.82 00077442 - 0155200000 13.60 00079303 - 0155300027 40.96 00110793- 0155250009 40.96 00079302 - 0155300018 40.96 00077443- 0155300009 61.40 00078162- 0120835016 73.45 00077443 - 0155250018 2,251.31 00077479 - 0113317143 255.17 00101025- 0203600013 523.24 00101025- 0203610011 350.67 00077442- 0203158000 72.23 00077443 - 0200862003 189.25 00077443- 0203158108 60.62 00077443 - 0203163003 515.89 00082050- 0200650009 74.42 00082198- 0200815001 572.95 00102561 - 0203163012 1,307.76 00103426- 0203502003 199.09 00103426 - 0203502012 788.31 00104391- 0200650018 64.84 00077442- 0200650027 8,305.74 120433 COMCAST 74.95 8772 15 614 0388355 191798 080108 4077.6103 191518 0112920000 -7/08 5841.6189 191519 0155200000 -7/08 5420.6189 191520 0155300027 -7108 5511.6189 191521 0155250009 -7108 5420.6189 191522 0155300018 -7/08 5511.6189 191523 0155300009 -7/08 5511.6189 191524 0120835016 -7108 5111.6189 191525 0155250018 -7/08 5420.6189 191526 0113317143 -7/08 5620.6189 191698 0203600013 -7/08 1628.6189 191699 0203610011 -7/08 1628.6189 191700 0203158000 -7/08 1552.6189 191701 0200862003 -7/08 5841.6189 191702 0203158108 -7/08 1552.6189 191703 0203163003 -7/08 5861.6189 191704 0200650009 -7108 1551.6189 191705 0200815001 -7108 1375.6189 191706 0203163012 -7/08 5861.6189 191707 0203502003 -7/08 1552.6189 191708 0203502012 -7/08 1552.6189 191709 0200650018 -7/08 1551.6189 191710 0200650027 -7/08 1646.6189 191607 072308 5424.6406 TOOLS HEAT FUEL OIL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER SEWER & WATER GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/6/._ _ _ 7:32:44 Page- 4 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE CITY HALL GENERAL PSTF FIRE TOWER EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION YORK OCCUPANCY CLUB HOUSE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CLUB HOUSE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT CLUB HOUSE EDINBOROUGH PARK SENIOR CITIZENS SENIOR CITIZENS CENT SVC PW BUILDING YORK OCCUPANCY CENT SVC PW BUILDING VERNON OCCUPANCY CITY HALL GENERAL PARKING RAMP VERNON OCCUPANCY CENT SVC PW BUILDING CENT SVC PW BUILDING CITY HALL GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE RANGE R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 816/2008 7:32:44 Council Check Register Page - 5 8/1/2008 80/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 59.00 8772 15 614 0433136 191608 072408 5422.6188 TELEPHONE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 133.95 312276 817/2008 122954 - COMMUNITY,.MEDIAGROUP 525.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 191609 80039 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 525.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 191609 80039 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 525.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 191609 80039 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,575.00 . 312277 81712008 101323 CONNEY SAFETYPRODUCTS 126.04 'GLOVES; SUNSCREEN, REPELLENID0001902 191527 _ 03309966 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION - 126.04 GLOVES,,- SUNSCREEN, REPELLEN106001902 191527 03309966 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 126.04: • GLOVES, _SUNSCREEN; REPELLEN100001902 191527 03309966 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING MAINTENANCE 126.04 GLOVES, SUNSCREEN, REPELLEN100001902 191527 03309966 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 504`.16 312278 8/7/2008 104020 DALCO 296.07 PUNCH DEGREASER, WYPALL 00001842 191475 2003612 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 751.68 CAN LINERS, WYPALL 191610 2002574COR 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 674.66- CREDIT 191611 2002574CREDIT 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 208.23- CREDIT 191612 2002151CREDIT 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES' BUILDING MAINTENANCE 102.24 TOWEL DISPENSERS 00001846 191669- 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 337:29 : HANDWASH 00001826 191670 2004349 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 429.20 TOWELS 00001606 191671 2003660 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 71.09 WASP & HORNET KILLER 00001881 191814 2004866 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 71.09 WASP & HORNETKILLER 00001881. 191814 2004866 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 71.09 WASP &- HORNET KILLER 0000/881 191814 2004866 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 71.09 'WASP& HORNET KILLER 00001881 191814 2004866 1322:6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LfGHTING''ORNAMENTAL 1,317.95 312279 8/7/2008 122960 DANIELSON;,BECKY 15.00 PROGRAM REFUND 191712 073108 1600.4390.21 FIREARM SAFETY TRAINING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 15.00 312280 8/7/2008 100710 DAVE'S DAIRY 400.00 DAIRY 191613. 072408 5421.5516 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 400.00 312281 8/7/2008 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 57.60 191550 467331 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 75.00 191551 466670 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2;058.45 191730 467352 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING., R55CKREG LOG20000 Check # Date CITY OF . ..A Council Check Register 8/112008 --8/7/2008 Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 816/k, _ _ 7:32:44 Page - 6 2,191.05 312282 81712008 101534 DELI DOUBLE 8,570.05 FOOD 00006071 191614 84958 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 8,570.05 312283 8/7/2008 122384 DENNY HECKER'S FORD - MERCURY 22,407.00 2008 CROWN VICTORIA 00003082 191887 34886 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 22,407.00 2008 CROWN VICTORIA 00003082 191888 34848 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 22,407.00 2008 CROWN VICTORIA 00003082 191889 34885 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 22,407.00 2008 CROWN VICTORIA 00003082 191890 34899 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 22,407.00 2008 CROWN VICTORIA 00003082 191891 34887 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 22,407.00 2008 CROWN VICTORIA 00003082 191892 34849 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 134,442.00 312284 8/712008 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 102.93 BAKERY 191615 277288 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 45.01- INVOICE PAID IN ERROR 191616 277628 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 198.29 BAKERY 191617 278877 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 74.02 BAKERY 191618 279056 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 66.28 BAKERY 191619 279045 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 36.49 BAKERY 191620 279221 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 79.04 BAKERY 191815 279282 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 512.04 312285 817/2008 101349 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCE 136.50 LICENSE FEE 191528 144 - 065 -6942 01345.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -345 WOODLAND CIR 136.50 LICENSE FEE 191528 144- 065 -6942 01352.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -352 WOODEND DRIVE 273.00 312286 8/7/2008 122956 DEVITT, MAURICE 40.00 SR GOLF LEAGUE REFUND 191672 072808 1628.4392.02 SENIOR GOLF LEAGUE SENIOR CITIZENS 40.00 312287 8/712008 101986 DIBBLE, DON 19.00 LICENSE UPGRADE 191673 073108 1281.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS TRAINING 19.00 312288 8/7/2008 100739 EAGLE WINE 110.60 191552 91040 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 805.95 191553 89412 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING r � 3,595.89 191731 91034 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/6/2008 7:32:44 Council Check Reglster Page- 7 811/2008 -- 8/7/2008 - Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation. PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 4,512.44 312289 81712008 102259 EASY PICKER GOLF PRODUCTS _ - 1,028:93 YARDAGE SIGNS 00006074 191816 318831 5424.6590 RANGE BALLS RANGE 1,028.93 312290 81712008 101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 72.00 PERMIT #28426 GYMTUSE 191817 7147 1600.4390.25 CHEERLEEDING CAMP PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 72.00 312291 8/7/2008 102955 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 1,970.50 JULY FIELD TRIPS BUS SERVICE 191718 08 -069 1624.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PLAYGROUND & THEATER 1,970.50 312292 81712008- 105944 EMANUEL, LOU 202.00 OFFICIATING FEES 191799 080108 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 202.00 312293 817/2008 121440 EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS NETWO 5;000.00 CODE RED SERVICES. 191674 6919 1400.6160 DATA PROCESSING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 10,000.00 CODE RED SERVICES 191674 6919 4205.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PANDEMIC FLU GRANT 15,000.00 312294 817/2008 122951 ETICA FAIR :TRADE WINE 665.00 191760 997 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 665.00 312295 8/7/2008 116303 ETONIC WORLDWIDE LLC a - 562.66 MERCHANDISE 191621 121788 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL' SALES 562.68 312296 81712008 102179 EULL'S MANUFACTURING CO INC. ` 504.17 MANHOLE BRICK, SOLIDS 00001641 191893 79876 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 504.17 r 312297 8/712008 104991 EVANS, CONNIE 127.74 FOOD FOR RESALE 191818 080108 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 127.74 312298 8/7/2008,--, 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 67.00 191732 693176 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING i 67.00 R55CKREG -20000 16.04 PHOTO FINISHING 00003532 191821 CITY 01 A PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 16.04 Council Check Register 312301 8/1/2008 -- 8/712008 102003 FASTSIGNS BLOOMINGTON Check # Dale Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description CUT VINYL LETTERING 191476 312299 8/7/2008 5861.6406 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 144.84 40.74 SPARK PLUGS 00001746 191529 6- 1059692 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 30.91 HOSES 00001749 191819 6- 1060398 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 33.80 OIL COOLER LINES 00001749 191820 6- 1060404 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 105.45 634.53 312300 8/7/2008 312303 100297 FAST FOTO & DIGITAL 121386 FLINT HILLS RESOURCES LP 8161 7:32:44 Page - 6 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN r q 16.04 PHOTO FINISHING 00003532 191821 3532 -T2- 266933 1470.6408 PHOTOGRAPHIC SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 16.04 312301 817/2008 102003 FASTSIGNS BLOOMINGTON 144.64 CUT VINYL LETTERING 191476 190 -34470 5861.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES VERNON OCCUPANCY 144.84 312302 817/2008 120329 FIRE EQUIPMENT SPECIALTIES INC 634.53 FORCIBLE ENTRY TOOLS 00003668 191822 5743 1470.6556 TOOLS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 634.53 312303 8/7/2008 121386 FLINT HILLS RESOURCES LP 11,201.56 CRS -2 00005753 191823 9935787 -0 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 11,201.56 312304 8/7/2008 103985 FLOR, JON 125.00 AD DESIGN 191622 2106 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 125.00 312305 8/712008 102727 FORCE AMERICA 96.02 ROCKER SWITCHES, GAUGES 00001722 191477 01304954 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 96.02 312306 81712008 122074 FULTON, LAURA 17.70 PETTY CASH 191824 073108 5610.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION 66.68 PETTY CASH 191824 073108 5630.6620 TREES, FLOWERS, SHRUBS CENTENNIAL LAKES 131.80 PETTY CASH 191824 073108 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 216.18 312307 8/712008 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 195.00 KICKBALL T- SHIRTS 191675 76896 4077.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 340.00 SWEATSHIRTS 191676 76873 5311.6201 LAUNDRY POOL OPERATION 535.00 r q R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/6/2008 7:32:44 Council Check Register Page - 9 811/2008 -- 8/7/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 312308 8/7/2008 103185 GERTENS 15.13 TOPSOIL 00001925 191478 150843 4090.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET REVOLVING 15.13 312309 817/2008 122583 GHIZONI, DAVID 151.50 - OFFICIATING FEES 191800 080108 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 151.50 i 312310 8/712008 114510 GOODHUE COUNTY 300.00 OUT OF COUNTY WARRANT 191623 072908 1000.2055 DUE TO OTHER GOVERNMENTS GENERAL- FUND BALANCE SHEET 300.00 i 312311 81712008 102169 GOODWIN,'DON 150.00 PERFORMANCE 8/13108 191601 073108 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 312312 8/7/2008 101156 GOPHER SIGN CO. 846.68 SIGNS 00001898 191530 75831A 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 1,883.16 U -POSTS 00001384 191531 75831 1325.6531 SIGNS &.POSTS STREET NAME SIGNS 2,729.84 312313 8/7/2008 101103 - GRAINGER 212.16 BATTERIES; CLAMPS, PLIERS 00001892 191479 9693395775 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 220.18 TIMERS 00001908 191480 9694093775 1375.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARKING RAMP 178.41 BROOMS, HANDLES 00001892 191481 9693395767 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 86.19 EXTINGUISHER, WASP KILLER 00001865 191677 9690200705 1646.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT BUILDING'MAINTENANCE 427.83 BAGS, SNIPS, BATTERIES 00001914. 191825 9695147695 1325.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET NAME SIGNS 4.50 SOCKET 00006067 191826 9693291669 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 32.31 'SOCKETS; LAMPS 00006067 191827 9693291651 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 25.01 DEGREASER 191828 9680438323 7413.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF FIRE TOWER 1,186.59 312314 8/7/2008 102670 GRAND PERE WINES INC 960.00 191761 00021583 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 960.00 312315 8/7/2008 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 691.25 191554 102288 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 893.50 191733 102389 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING; 1,584.75 - 312316 8/7,; 122947 GREEN TOUCH SYSTEMS LLC R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF -_.,4A Council Check Register 811/2008 -- 8/712008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 564.72 ASPHALT RELEASE 00001659 191482 5015402 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 816/2u- 7:32:44 Page - 10 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 564.72 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 312317 8/7/2008 VERNON SELLING 100785 GREUPNER, JOE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2,208.00 GROUP LESSONS 191624 072808 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 2,208.00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 312318 81712008 VERNON SELLING 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 283.30 1641.6406 191555 91042 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS 46.90 191556 91043 1,704.30 191557 89411 1,295.67 191558 91041 8.00- 191559 756500 48.00- 191560 756501 121.05- 191561 757125 3,104.20 191734 91037 71.75 191735 91038 133.67 191762 91036 4,972.76 191763 91035 11,435.50 312319 81712008 100787 GRUBER'S POWER EQUIPMENT 204.02 TRIMMER LINE, TRIMMER HEADS 00001617 191678 59448 50.08 SPRINGS, ELEMENTS 00001789 191679 59618 254.10 312320 817/2008 100797 HAWKINS INC. 714.35 CAUSTIC SODA 191829 1214764 714.35 312321 817/2008 119474 HAY DOBBS 816/2u- 7:32:44 Page - 10 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE 5410.6132 PROFESSIONAL SVCS - GOLF GOLF ADMINISTRATION 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING` 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1641.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES MOWING 1641.6530 REPAIR PARTS MOWING 5311.6545 159.44 ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES 191830 6004.006 -14 45008.6710 CHEMICALS POOL OPERATION EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 159.44 312322 8/7/2008 122987 HEGYI, TAUNYA 148.95 UNIFORM PURCHASE 191894 080408 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 148.95 312323 817/2008 101209 HEIMARK FOODS 215.04 MEAT PATTIES 191831 021234 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 215.04 POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/6/2008 7:32:44 Council Check Register Page - 11 " 8/1/2008 -- 817/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 312324 817/2008 106371 HENNEPIN FACULTY ASSOCIATES ,- 2,403.00 MEDICAL DIRECTOR SERVICES 191832 Q86476 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 2,403.00 312325 817/2008 112807 HESSIAN, ROBERT 46.50 OFFICIATING FEES 191805 080108 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 46.50 312326: 8/7/2008 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 663.90 191736 459752 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING I • 277:50 191737 459077 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING; 51.90 191738 459672 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING - 1,334.75 191739 459671 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,328.05 312327 8/7/2008 100808 HORWATH, THOMAS 701.99 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 191895 080408 1644.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE TREES & MAINTENANCE 701.99 312328 8/712008 101426 HUGHES- GORDON, i i 397.80 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 191680 073108 1120.6107 MILEAGE ORALLOWANCE ADMINISTRATION 397.80 312329 81712008 122565 HYSER, TIMOTHY 101.00. OFFICIATING FEES 191801 080108 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 101.00 312330 81712008 122955 INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR 1,510.15 CD -DVD DRIVES 191625 1100038368 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL . 3,020.30 CD -DVD DRIVES 00003132 191626 1100038661 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT: GENERAL i 65,873.30 TOUGHBOOKS 00003132 191627 - 1100031879 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 70,403.75 312331 8/7/2008 103193 INTOXIMETERS INC. 188.97 INTOX MOUTHPIECES 191628 253556 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL - 188.97 312332 81712008 101400 JAMES, WILLIAM F 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 191464 080708 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 312333 8171' 100830 JERRY'S PRINTING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF �-.,aA Council Check Register 811/2008 -- 817/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 234.30 FRIENDS OF THE ARTS LETTER 00009382 191833 43851 5110.6575 234.30 Subledger Account Description PRINTING 816/2t).. 7:32:44 Page - 12 Business Unit ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 312334 BM2008 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN 193.00 191629 1191661 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 352.60 191630 913474 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 15.00 191740 1192223 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,877.25 191741 1192222 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,437.85 312336 8/712008 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 1,847.12 191562 1476834 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 567.84 191563 1477582 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 143.96 191564 1477581 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 78.38- 191565 373321 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 336.33- 191566 378868 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 92.12- 191567 378867 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 36.11 191742 1480452 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 37.61 191764 1480442 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 7,004.08 191765 1480440 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,262.91 191766 1480451 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 885.08 191767 1480448 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,496.71 191768 1480450 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.12 191769 1480441 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,824.46 191770 1480449 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 169.66 191771 1480453 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 596.76 191772 1480434 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 479.39 191773 1480431 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 543.80 191774 1480432 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 496.62 _ 191775 1480433 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 248.46 191776 1480435 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 71.22 191777 1480436 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 17,206.08 312337 8/712008 103449 KAMPA, TINA 122.21 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 191713 073108 1624.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLAYGROUND & THEATER 122.21 312338 8/712008 111018 KEEPRS INC. 389.97 UNIFORMS 00003679 191834 95654 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 337.24 UNIFORMS 00003577 191835 95918 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 230.97 UNIFORMS 00003681 191836 95996 1470.6558 DEPT UNIFORMS FIRE DEPT. GENERAL - R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/6/2008 7:32:44 Council Check Register Page - 13 8/112008 -- 81712008 ,. Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit = 958.18 312339 8/7/2008 121265 KID SAFARI - 7.23 PARTIAL REFUND 191837 073108 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTERiBALANCE SHEET 108.73 PARTIAL REFUND'- 191837 073108 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS AQUATIC CENTER: REVENUES 115.96 312340 81712008 118332 KIMMEL, JANIS j 1.87 PARTIAL REFUND 191532 072908 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER�BALANCE SHEET 28.13 PARTIAL REFUND 191532 072908 5301.4532 SEASON TICKETS AQUATIC CENTER; REVENUES 30.00 312341 8/712008 116295 .KING PAR CORPORATION i 377.25 MERCHANDISE 191631 2475192 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 260.33 MERCHANDISE 191632 2475180 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS; - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL; SALES 113.91 MERCHANDISE ' 191633 2475649 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 521.06 MERCHANDISE 191634 2475648 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,272.55 312342 817/2008 101760 KOOLMO. CONSTRUCTION INC. " 86,150.00 .. PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT 191838 1080 47059.6.710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT YORK PARK PLAYGROUND 86,150.00 312343 81712008 119947 KRAEMER MINING & MATERIALS INC 716.11 FA -2 CHIPS 00005745 191839 195729 1314.6517 SAND GRAVEL & ROCK STREET RENOVATION 716.11 312344 81712008 100605 LANDS' END BUSINESS OUTFITTERS 45:63 LOGO CLOTHING 00004101 191533 6708548 1513.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS 45:63 - 312345 8/712008 101220 LAND EQUIPMENT INC. 114.36 OIL & FILTER 00002394 191840 184688 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 244.71 FILTERS, GAUGES 00002380 191841 184632 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 359.07 312346 817/2008 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. 98.15 PIPE SEALER 00001878 191483 7082723 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 98.15 312347 8/7/2008 100855 LESCOINC. 424.19 HERBICIDE, MULCH 00001474 191896 21895856 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF -4A 8/6/2u -- 7:32:44 Council Check Register Page - 14 8/1/2008 -- 8/7/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 424.19 312348 8/7/2008 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,005.91 191743 43167 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 1190.6104 1190.6104 1553.6180 7410.6103 1623.6107 5862.5514 5862.5514 5862.5514 5862.5515 5862.5514 5842.5515 5842.5514 5430.5514 5421.5510 1495.6188 1400.6203 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING CONTRACTED REPAIRS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD TELEPHONE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PSTF ADMINISTRATION TENNIS INSTRUCTION VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GRILL INSPECTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1,005.91 312349 817/2008 101165 M.A.A.O. 90.00 SEMINARS 191842 080108 250.00 MAAO FALL CONFERENCE 191842 080108 340.00 312350 8/712008 100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 2,693.82 EQUIPMENT REPAIR 00001146 191484 S -08449 2,693.82 312351 817/2008 122188 MACMAGIC 47.50 WEBSITE SUPPORT 191843 3879 47.50 .312352 81712008 121390 MADISON, SAMUEL 74.85 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 191714 073108 74.85 312353 81712008 100868 MARK VII SALES 112.25 191568 355301 1,435.20 191569 355300 220.00 191570 355002 154.80 191571 355003 3,155.45 191572 355001 40.00 191573 355880 64.50 191574 355881 302.30 191635 354071 625.40 191844 356854 6,109.90 312354 8/7/2008 102600 MATRIX COMMUNICATIONS INC 397.73 191636 44584 397.73 312355 81712008 101928 MCKENZIE, THOMAS 202.37 VISON LENSES 191637 073008 202.37 1190.6104 1190.6104 1553.6180 7410.6103 1623.6107 5862.5514 5862.5514 5862.5514 5862.5515 5862.5514 5842.5515 5842.5514 5430.5514 5421.5510 1495.6188 1400.6203 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ASSESSING CONTRACTED REPAIRS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD TELEPHONE UNIFORM ALLOWANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN PSTF ADMINISTRATION TENNIS INSTRUCTION VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING RICHARDS GOLF COURSE GRILL INSPECTIONS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL R55CKREG LOG20000 . CITY OF EDINA 8/6/2008 7:32:44 Council Check Register Page - 15 8/1/2008 — 8/7/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier /.Explanation.:' PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 312356 81712008 105603 MEDICINE'LAKE TOURS 1,928.50 OLD LOG THEATER TRIP 191681 072908 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 1,928.50 312357 81712008 101457 MEICHSNER, EARL , ,. 148.65 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 191682 072508 1652.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE WEED MOWING 148.65 312358 81712008 101483 MENARDS 5.92 SKELETON GUNS 00001884 191485 55520 5932.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL STORM SEWER 5.92 312359 81712008 101987 MENARDS 108.76 BLADES, SPRINKLERS, SANDPAPER0002382 191845 5432 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 108.76 312360 81712008 102729 METROPOL•ITAN'FORD OF EDEN PRAI 200.00 AUTO REPAIRS 00001929 191534 FOCS144445 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 7.98 SEAL 00001730 191535 459909FOW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 207.98 312361 8/712008 110506 MID AMERICA METER INC. I. " 1,246.32 HYDRANT METER 00001685 191486 08 -238 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 1,246.32 i 312362 817/2008 100891 . MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP. 8,151.28 ASPHALT .. 00005748 191846 941BOMB 5913.6518 BLACKTOP DISTRIBUTION _ 1,979.87 ASPHALT 00005748 191847 94396MB 5913.6518 BLACKTOP' DISTRIBUTION 10,131.15 -_ 312363 81712008 100892 MIDWEST BADGE '& NOVELTY CO. IN 50.26 ROSSETTES, RIBBONS: 00009371 191848 111446 5120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ART SUPPLY GIFT GALLERY SHOP 50.26 312364 8/712008 100692 MIDWEST. COCA -COCA BOTTLING CO. 343.50 191575 0178155118 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 607.30 191744 0158074315 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING` 950.80 312365 81712008 100522 MINNESOTA AIR INC. 40.77 CONTACTORS, CABLE TIES 00001886 191536 1134107 -00 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUI! ": '.' R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF --,..A 8/6/20ua 7:32:44 Council Check Register Page - 16 811/2008 - 81712008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 66.07 CONTACTORS, CABLE TIES 00001886 191536 1134107 -00 5820.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH STREET GENERAL 239.67 MOTOR MODULES 00001868 191683 1133783 -00 1646.6530 REPAIR PARTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE 346.51 312366 817/2008 122952 MINNESOTA FREEDOM BAND 150.00 PERFORMANCE 8/11/08 191598 073108 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 312367 81712008 100905 MINNESOTA GOLF ASSOCIATION 108.00 GHIN HANDICAPS 191849 45- 150 -21 -7/08 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 108.00 GHIN HANDICAPS 191850 45- 150 -13 -7/08 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 1,098.00 GHIN HANDICAPS 191851 45- 150 -16 -7/08 5401.4603 COMPUTERIZED HANDICAPS GOLF REVENUES 1,314.00. 312368 8/712008 103260 MINNESOTA NURSERY & LANDSCAPE 99.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL 00001787 191684 2008 1640.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS PARK MAINTENANCE GENERAL 99.00 312369 817/2008 - 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 42.60 STEEL 00001331 191487 0077597 -IN 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 318.44 BANJO VALVE 00001338 191488 0077596 -IN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 361.04 312370 81712008 122793 MODERN MARKETING INC. 730.65 WRIST RESTRAINTS 191638 MM1057834 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 730.65 312371 81712008 122019 MOORE CREATIVE TALENT 500.00 HOSTING FEE 191639 124508 2210.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES COMMUNICATIONS 500.00 312372 81712008 102395 MOSE, WILLIAM 353.50 OFFICIATING FEES 191802 080108 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 353.50 312373 81712008 102778 MRPA 690.00 K. AARSVOLD, D. TILSNER CONFEREN91715 073108 1600.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 690.00 312374 81712008 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 244.83 SEAT, DIPSTICK 00002389 191852 632185 -00 5630.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENTENNIAL LAKES 244.83 -- R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/6/2008 7:32:44 Council Check Register Page - 17 811/2008 -- 817/2008 Check # Dale Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 312375 81712008 104350 NIKE.USA INC'. " 60.51 MERCHANDISE 191640 916876000 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 60.51 _i i 312376 8/7/2008 100724 NISSEN, DICK 100.00 POLICE SERVICE- 191463 _ 080708 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 i 312377 817/2008 101620 NORTH SECOND STREET STEEL SUPP i 149.42 PIPE 00001711 191853 138726 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 149.42 I 312378 817/2008 116480 . NSITE MYSTERY SHOPPING 110:00 SECRET SHOPPING 191489 1884 5822.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 50TH ST SELLING 110:00 SECRET SHOPPING 191489 1884 5842.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 110.00: SECRET SHOPPING 191489 1884 5862.6406 GENERAL-SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING i 330.00 312379 817/2008 103578 OFFICE DEPOT 20.85 PAPER 00006034-.191641 437065346 -001 5410.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION 20.85 312380 817/2008 100939 OTIS SPUNKMEYER INC. 115.30 COOKIES 191537 16164483 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 176.12 COOKIES 191642 16040383 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL "291.42 312381 81712008 115083. PATTINSON, WALT 170.00 MEDIA INSTRUCTOR 130466 021706 5125.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MEDIA STUDIO 170.00 312382 817/2008 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS 326.01 191576 8191050 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING; . 270.00 191577 8192052 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 596.00 191745 8192470 -IN 5862:5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,231.00 191746 8192467 -IN 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 136.00 191778 8191049 -IN 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 2,559.01 312383 8/7/2008 100945 PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 1,110.34 191643 43977651 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF E-NA 8/6/20un 7:32:44 Council Check Register Page - 18 8/1/2008 -- 817/2008 Check # Dale Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 325.49 191685 42890409 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 215.55 191854 31387696 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 609.57 191855 43888895 5630.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 2,260.95 312384 817/2008 100948 PERKINS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS 1,080:00 LANDSCAPE WORK 00001788 191686 072908 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 1,080.00 312385 8/7/2008 119372 PETSMART #463 84.43 K9 DOG FOOD 00003182 191856 T -0158 4607.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EDINA CRIME FUND K9 DONATION 84.43 312386 81712008 100743 PHILLIPS WINE & SPIRITS' 190.96 191578 2636449 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 65.07- 191579 3385268 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 65.12- 191580 3385270 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 21.12 191779 2636775 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 139.29 191780 2638774 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 868.89 191781 2638776 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,790.81 191782 2638772 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 324.48 191783 2638777 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 566.72 191784 2638767 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 49.12 191785 2638773 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 194.16 191786 2638765 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 496.73 191787 2638766 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 2,373.08 191788 2638764 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 43.62- 191789 3382879C 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 6.68- 191790 3390785 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 6.68- 191791 3390787 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 13.59- 191792 3390788 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 8.29- 191793 3390786 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 9,806.31 312387 8/712008 100953 PHYSIO- CONTROL INC. 937.50 LIFEPAK MAINTENANCE 00003644 191857 PH426369 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 937.50 312388 8/7/2008 111340 POLAR CHEVROLET 60,266.00 2 CHEVROLET TAHOES 00003624 191858 8J241742 1470.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 60,266.00 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/6/2008 7:32:44 Council Check Register Page - 19 811/2008 -- 8/7/2008 Check # Date Amount Suppller / Explanation ,PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 312389 817/2008 11'9620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 47.60 FOAM FILL MATERIAL 00001931 191538 123189 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ' 909.41 TIRES, SERVICE 00001062 191539 23337 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 957.01 i 312390 817/2008 100961 POSTMASTER - USPS ' 360.00 NEWSLETTER POSTAGE 191664 073108 1628.6235 POSTAGE SENIOR CITIZENS 360.00 312391 8/7/2008 106152 POWERPLAN 233.80 FILTERS, ELEMENTS 00001725 191490 P35371 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 233.80 312392 81712008 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY 499.20 191581 91044 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 95.90 191747 91039 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING, 595.10 312393 817/2008 113732 PROFESSIONAL TOOL SALES i 96.65 CUT OFF DISCS 00001905 191491 80634 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 97.64 CABLE TIES 00001936 191859 80647 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 163.15 DRILL BITS 00001558 191860 80616 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 357.44 312394 817/2008 112097 PUMP & METER SERVICE INC. 184.24 ADVANTAGE LIFT REPAIRS 00001949 191861 263262 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING - 184.24 312395 817/2008 100971 QUALITY WINE 1,579.61 191582 039913 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING ' - 3,189.26 191583 041046 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 869.61 191584 041097 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,184.88 191585 041059 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING ` 61.60 191586 041098 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING ' 1,374.20 191587 039923 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 85.60 191588 041165 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 76.60 191589 039527 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING ` 161.60 191590 039364 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 728.00 191748 041145 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 85.60 191749 041164 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING.' 1,507.90 191750 040889 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 3,417.94 191794 041058 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF L. iA Council Check Register 8/1/2008 -- 8/7/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 8/6/2u­ 7:32:44 Page - 20 Business Unit 1400.6188 14,322.40 POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 312396 81712008 TELEPHONE 101965 QWEST 4090.6188 TELEPHONE STREET REVOLVING 5911.6188 39.68 952 922 -9246 1628.6188 191862 9246 -7/08 5861.6188 123.34 952 927 -8861 5821.6188 191863 8661 -7108 5841.6188 78.45 952 929 -9549 1470.6186 191864 9549 -7/08 5610.6188 55.20 952 929 -0297 1622.6188 191865 0297 -7/08 1646.6188 55.37 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5932.6188 191897 072808 5511.6188 58.06 ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 1550.6188 191897 072808 83.37 191897 072808 96.70 191897 072808 102.09 191897 072808 115.28 191897 072808 161.82 191897 072808 164.45 191897 072808 233.04 191897 072808 264.63 191897 072808 297.11 191897 072808 2,105.60 191897 072808 4,034.19 312397 8/7/2008 122978 RAKES, PENELOPE 15.00 PROGRAM REFUND 191866 080108 15.00 312398 817/2008 102794 REHRIG PACIFIC COMPANY 4,180.94 RECYCLING BINS 00004110 191492 KE65794 4,180.94 312399 8f712008 119755 RICCI, PATRICE 93.00 OFFICIATING FEES 191804 080108 93.00 312400 81712008 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 277.89 SOFTENER SALT 00006072 191644 00210097 277.89 312401 8/712008 100985 RUFFRIDGE JOHNSON EQ CO INC 278.65 SOLENOID, CYLINDER 00001747 191493 C50520 118.91 NEUTRAL SWITCH 00005817 191540 C49772 397.56 8/6/2u­ 7:32:44 Page - 20 Business Unit 1400.6188 TELEPHONE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 4090.6188 TELEPHONE STREET REVOLVING 5911.6188 TELEPHONE PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 1628.6188 TELEPHONE SENIOR CITIZENS 5861.6188 TELEPHONE VERNON OCCUPANCY 5821.6188 TELEPHONE 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 5841.6188 TELEPHONE YORK OCCUPANCY 1470.6186 TELEPHONE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 5610.6188 TELEPHONE ED ADMINISTRATION 1622.6188 TELEPHONE SKATING & HOCKEY 1646.6188 TELEPHONE BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5932.6188 TELEPHONE GENERAL STORM SEWER 5511.6188 TELEPHONE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 1550.6188 TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1600.4390.21 FIREARM SAFETY TRAINING PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 5952.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RECYCLING 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC' ASSOCIATION 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/6/2008 7:32:44 Council Check Register Page - 21 8/1/2008 -- 817/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier [Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 312402 81712008 122957 RUSTAD, CLAIRE 228.50. MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 191716 073108 1624.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE PLAYGROUND & THEATER 228.50 312403 81712008 101963 S & S SPECIALISTS 685.00 OAK WILT PROGRAM 00001780 191687 23056 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TREES & MAINTENANCE 685.00 312404 817/2008 104087 SAFE ASSURE CONSULTANTS INC. 300.00 PROGRAMS & ON -LINE TRAINING 191867 114 7411.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY 300.00 312405 8/712008 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 52.79 BAKERY` 191645 222707 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL ' 18.00- CREDIT ON ACCT 191646 222710 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 34.79 312406 81712008 122959 SARE 22.98 PARTIAL REFUND 191868 073108 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 22.98 312407 81712008 119799 SCHIMETZ, SCOTT 227.25 OFFICIATING FEES 191803 080108 4077.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 227.25 312408 817/2008 At14151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 627.75 QUARTERLY MAINTENANCE 191688 8102139992 1628.6103.07 TRIPS PROF SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS. 619.44 QUARTERLY MAINTENANCE 00001950 191869 8102140923 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 1,247.19 312409 - 817/2008 < 104251 SHANNON, IDELLE 155.00 COVER FOR TIRE, REPAIR DRAPE 191870 072508 5610.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ED ADMINISTRATION 155.00 312410 81712008 103249 SHANNON, JIM 130.00 PERFORMANCE 8/10/08 191597 073108 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 130.00 - 312411 817/2008 101000 SIR SPEEDY 52.45 BUSINESS CARDS 191541 58046 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 52.45 i R55CKREG LOG20000 SPEED CARTS 191648 261822 CITY OF EUINA COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 260.10 SPEED CARTS 191649 260925 Council Check Register COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 133.50- CREDIT 191650 884679 8/1/2008 -- 817/2008 PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES Check # Dale Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 312412 B/712008 105193 SPAIN, MARK 312418 817/2008 100794 SWANSON, HAROLD 2,460.15 STUMP GRINDING 00001359 191689 072408 1644.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 080708 1419.6102 2,460.15 RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 312413 8/7/2008 101021 SPEEDWAY SUPERAMERICA LLC 119637 SWEENEY, J. SHAWN 15.90 MERCHANDISE 00001943 191871 072408 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 190.20 PROPANE 00001943 191871 072408 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 312420 8/7/2008 467.54 GAS 00001943 191871 072408 1553.6581 GASOLINE 37.00 BEERLINE CLEANING 673.64 975765 5421.6102 .CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL 312414 8/7/2008 103277 ST. JOSEPH EQUIPMENT CO INC 5.56 SHOULDER BO 00001147 191494 SI65682 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 895.79 BUSHINGS, PINS, WIPERS 00001321 191872 SI64646 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 901.35 312415 817/2008 101015 STREICHERS 61.75 GUN CASE 00003186 191647 1537672 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE 61.75 312416 81712008 101017 SUBURBAN CHEVROLET 25.43 WHEEL CAPS 00001726 191542 121611CVW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 33.39 REAR LENS 00001727 191543 121678CVW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 36.32 WHEEL CAPS 00001726 191544 121612 -1CVW 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 95.14 312417 8/7/2008 102140 SUN MOUNTAIN SPORTS INC. 8/612008 7:32:44 Page - 22 Business Unit TREES & MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GENERAL MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 260.10 SPEED CARTS 191648 261822 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 260.10 SPEED CARTS 191649 260925 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 133.50- CREDIT 191650 884679 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 133.50- CREDIT 191651 884680 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 253.20 312418 817/2008 100794 SWANSON, HAROLD 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 191462 080708 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE PROGRAM 100.00 312419 8/7/2008 119637 SWEENEY, J. SHAWN 150.00 PERFORMANCE 8/12/08 191599 073108 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 150.00 312420 8/7/2008 111616 T.D. ANDERSON INC. 37.00 BEERLINE CLEANING 191652 975765 5421.6102 .CONTRACTUAL SERVICES GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/1/2008 -- 8/7/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 37.00 312421 817/2008 122949 TANK TRUCK EQUIPMENT Business Unit 816/2008 7:32:44 Page - 23 1,500.00 312428 8/7/2008 103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 492.90 OPTICOM, LOAD SWITCHES 00001875 191876 32811 1330.6530 REPAIR PARTS 492.90 312429 817/200A 101048 TRI COUNTY BEVERAGE'S SUPPLY TRAFFIC SIGNALS i 367.96 - HOSES, CLAMPS, FITTINGS '00001928 191495 INVO04262 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 367.96 I 312422 8/7/2008 .104932 TAYLOR MADE • 218.94 STAFF SHIRTS 191653 11125444 5424.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RANGE 135.00 GOLF CLUB 191654 11155546 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 353.94 312423 817/2008 117686 TECHNAGRAPHICS 421.37 ANIMAL IMPOUND FORMS 191873 8037011 1400.6575 PRINTING POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 421.37 312424 8/7/2008 101028 TERRY, ANN -SALES CO 464.34 CUPS - 191874 2459 5410.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF ADMINISTRATION .464.34 312425 .81712008 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 470.00 191655 502227 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 88.25 191751 503404 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 4,044.10 191752 503192 5862.5514 COST OF -GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 81.50 191753 503193 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 798.00 191875 68540 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 5,481:85 312426 81712008 104347 .,TIERNEY BROTHERS INC. 349.32 REMOTES FOR PRESENTATIONS 191656 537037 -1 2210.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES COMMUNICATIONS 349.32 312427 817/2008 120700 TIGER OAK, PUBLICATIONS INC." . 500.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 191657 2008 -15194 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 500.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 191657 2608 -15194 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 500.00 MAGAZINE ADVERTISING 191657 2008 -15194 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,500.00 312428 8/7/2008 103982 TRAFFIC CONTROL CORPORATION 492.90 OPTICOM, LOAD SWITCHES 00001875 191876 32811 1330.6530 REPAIR PARTS 492.90 312429 817/200A 101048 TRI COUNTY BEVERAGE'S SUPPLY TRAFFIC SIGNALS i R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/612008 7:32:44 Council Check Register Page - 24 8/1/2008 -- 81712008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 32.50 191754 208739 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 32.50 312430 8/712008 101042 TRIARCO 114.09 BUTTON PARTS, FABRIC MARKERS00009378 191877 486091 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 72.67 NYLON TOTES 00009378 191878 492652 5110.6564 CRAFT SUPPLIES ART CENTER ADMINISTRATION 186.76 312431 817/2008 101172 TWIN CITY SAW CO. 43.61 COIL 00001728 191879 A15356 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 43.61 312432 8/7 12008 122953 ULLAND, DOUG 133.00 GREENS FEES REFUND 191658 073008 5401.4592 GREEN FEES NINE HOLES GOLF REVENUES 133.00 312433 81712008 122958 UPSTREAM ARTS INC. 1,344.00 8/4 -8/7 CAMP 191719 080108 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 1,344.00 312434 81712008 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 169.65 GATE VALVES, NIPPLES 00001887 191496 637651 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 169.65 312435 817 /2008 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. 62.77 PAGER RENTAL 191880 R6339611G 1470.6151 EQUIPMENT RENTAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 62.77 312436 8f712008 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 98.29 CUPS 00006347 191659 088316 -00 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 98.29- CREDIT 191660 089083CI 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 97.93 CUPS 00006347 191661 089099 -00 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 274.62 ROLL TOWEL, TISSUE, FORKS 00001605 191690 089524 -00 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 356.49 TISSUE, TOWELS, PLATES, SPOON90001622 191691 089512 -00 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 533.42 LIQUOR BAGS 00007512 191692 089404 -00 5842.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES YORK SELLING 1,262.46 312437 81712008 106308 VEITH, MICHELLE 206.72 NATURE CAMP SPECIALIST 191720 805 1600.4390.04 NATURE CAMP PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 500.00 AR &LE FALL CATALOG 191721 803 1629.6575 PRINTING ADAPTIVE RECREATION 706.72 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/112006 -- 8/7/2008 8/6/2008 7:32:44 Page - 25 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No . Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 312438 817/2008 101067 VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 223.65 PAD LOCKS 00001533 191693 227618 1646.6556 TOOLS BUILDING MAINTENANCE." 313.23 VESTS 00001872 191881 228653 5913.6616 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 536.88 312439 8/7/2008 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 79.26 191497 23599905 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION - 512.47 191497 23599905 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 33.61 191545 23609286 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION - 206.31 CONCESSION PRODUCT 191545 23609286 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 94.12 CLEANING PRODUCT 191882 23628444 5311.6511 CLEANING. SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 514.05 CONCESSION PRODUCT 191882 23628444 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 1,439:82 312440 8/7/2008 101080 - WALSH, WILLIAM 100.00 POLICE SERVICE 191461 080708 1419.6102 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES RESERVE' PROGRAM 100.00 312441 817/2008 101078 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT `• 621.96 HOSE AND REEL 00001139 191546 0037605 4N 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING - 621.96' 312442 8/712008 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE '. 276:80 191755 198406 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING; 1,405.80 191756 198405 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 8.00- 191757 198186 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 24.00 -. 191758 198191 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE' YORK SELLING 1,650.60 312443 81712008 101312, WINE MERCHANTS 261.12 191591 239264 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 91.00- 191592 36685 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 145:12- 191593 37550 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 61719 191795 239835 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 828.08 191796 239831 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING , 81.12- 191797 39301 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING ' 1,389.25 312444 817/2008 101082 WITTEK GOLF SUPPLY 231.08 GOLF BALLS, PENCILS 00002007 191883 204584 5630.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 231.08 R55CKREG _,jG20000 CITY G. NA 8/6,__ _0 7:32:44 Council Check Register Page - 26 8/1/2008 -- 817/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 312445 8/7/2008 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 407.50 191594 214704 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 262.00 191595 214902 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 105.50- 191596 214386 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 450.00 191759 214901 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,014.00 312447 81712008 101726 XCEL ENERGY 268.73 51- 5005454 -3 191498 161833283 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 441.11 51- 5938955 -6 191499 161681361 4086.6185 LIGHT & POVYER AQUATIC WEEDS 8.52 51- 6050184 -2 191500 161683930 4086.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AQUATIC WEEDS 329.20 51- 8324712 -5 191501 161727460 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 37.40 51- 6892224 -5 191502 161704195 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 25.32 51- 6541084 -2 191503 161694846 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 3,165.97 51- 5547446 -1 191504 161844868 1628.6185 LIGHT & POWER SENIOR CITIZENS 63.52 51- 8526048 -8 191505 161737916 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 1,841.61 51- 5107681 -4 191506 161662649 5111.6185 LIGHT & POWER ART CENTER BLDG/MAINT 54.92 51- 6692497 -0 191507 161698845 1460.6185 LIGHT & POWER CIVILIAN DEFENSE 30,523.94 51- 4621797 -2 191508 161991079 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 34.41 51- 8102668 -0 191509 162051388 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 5,725.17 51- 4827232 -6 191510 161992362 5311.6185 LIGHT & POWER POOL OPERATION 367.26 51- 7996457 -7 191511 162049678 1470.6185 LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 990.80 51- 6223269 -1 191547 161689749 5210.6185 LIGHT & POWER GOLF DOME PROGRAM 1,637.11 51- 8756308 -0 191662 155775791 5422.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 165.88 51- 6229265 -9 191694 162195425 1481.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK FIRE STATION 1,689.29 51- 6229265 -9 191694 162195425 1470.6165' LIGHT & POWER FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 154.47 51- 4156445 -0 191695 162147430 5932.6185 LIGHT & POWER GENERAL STORM SEWER 797.75 51- 6046826 -0 191696 162188452 5422.6185 LIGHT & POWER MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 158.07 51- 5634814 -2 191697 162183143 5933.6185 LIGHT & POWER PONDS & LAKES 3,046.28 51- 4159265 -8 191884 161640922 7411.6185 LIGHT & POWER PSTF OCCUPANCY 5,411.55 51- 4966303 -6 191885 162166105 1330.6185 LIGHT & POWER TRAFFIC SIGNALS 26,200.13 51- 4888627 -1 191898 162485831 5511.6185 LIGHT & POWER ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 83,138.41 312448 8/7/2008 101091 ZIEGLER INC 1,191.84 GENERATOR COOLER 191512 SW050117125 1551.6530 REPAIR PARTS CITY HALL GENERAL 1,191.84 734,459.62 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 734,459.62 Total Payments 734,459.62 R55CKSUM LOG20000 Company 01000 GENERALFUND 02200 COMMUNICATIONS FUND 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 05100 ART CENTER FUND 05200 GOLF DOME FUND _ - 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 05800 LIQUOR FUND 05900 UTILITY FUND 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 05950 RECYCLING FUND 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND Report Totals CITY OF EDINA 8/6/2008 7:34:13 Council Check Summary Page - 1 811/2008 8/7/2008 Amount 438,330.03 1,901.75 100,828.58 2,544.33 990.80 11,339.93 26,374.04 26,592:76 5,508.17 97,827.47 12,805.77 1,806.14 4;180.94 3,428.91 734,459.62 I j i we 0I'P9'410 the NOV Ow �nd:belief, tt1�4 thAS® daffni ali,mefe"d re With the �4.ot #9'tA,� � putchift, mt , ity ger R55CKREG LOG20000 584.24 READY MIX 00005752 192085 CITY OF EDINA 741.83- READY MIX 00005752 "192086 4226312 1314.6520 Council Check Register 479.18 READY MIX 00005752 192087 4226495 5923.6406 8/14/2008 -- 8/14/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier 1 Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 312449 8/14/2008 100715 ..ACCLAIM BENEFITS 192522 32050 -14 1621.6406 6,453.90 152.00 COBRA ADMIN 192261 .006316 1550.6040 123010 ALEACE, SUNNY 152.00 75.00 PERFORMANCE 8/18/08 192351" 312450 8/1412008 102971 ACE ICE COMPANY 312454 8/1412008 78.08 100058 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 191900 0611274 5842.5515 35,380.00 RECYCLING 88.16 1455873 5952.6183 191901 - 0611278 5862.5515 132.03 312455 8114/2008 191902 0720954 5862.5515 50.08 142.14,1 K9 TRIALS LODGING - M. SEEGER 191903 `0611273 5822.5515 142.14 48.64 191904 0720953 5842.5515 102470 AON RISK SERVICES INC. OF MN 18.56 192392 0611290 5862.5515 192262 6100000103649 1550.6200 63.60 5,954.00 192393 0721027 5842.5515 1550.6200 63.60 192394 0611289 5842.5515 19.04 192395 0611286 5822.5515 561.79 312451 8114/2008 102626 AGGREGATE INDUSTRIES 359.44 READY MIX 00005752 192084. 4225946 5932.6520 Subledger Account Description HOSPITALIZATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/13/2008 8:36:26 Page - ' 1 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING, - VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL STORM SEWER STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION COLLECTION SYSTEMS ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION RECYCLING CHARGES RECYCLING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS INSURANCE INSURANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL . CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 584.24 READY MIX 00005752 192085 4226113 1314.6520 741.83- READY MIX 00005752 "192086 4226312 1314.6520 479.18 READY MIX 00005752 192087 4226495 5923.6406 2,164.69 312452 8/14/2008 100620 AIM ELECTRONICS 6,453.90 WIRELESS :SCOREBOARD 00007033 192522 32050 -14 1621.6406 6,453.90 312453 8/14/2008 123010 ALEACE, SUNNY 75.00 PERFORMANCE 8/18/08 192351" 081108 5610.6136 75.00 312454 8/1412008 100058 ALLIED WASTE SERVICES #894 35,380.00 RECYCLING 192357 1455873 5952.6183 35, 380.00 312455 8114/2008 122994 AMERICINN LODGE & SUITES 142.14,1 K9 TRIALS LODGING - M. SEEGER 192168. 970 1400.6104 142.14 ; 312456 8/1412008 102470 AON RISK SERVICES INC. OF MN 18,595.00 PREMIUM. 192262 6100000103649 1550.6200 5,954.00 PREMIUM 192263 6100000103650 1550.6200 Subledger Account Description HOSPITALIZATION COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX CONCRETE CONCRETE CONCRETE GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES 8/13/2008 8:36:26 Page - ' 1 Business Unit CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING, - VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING GENERAL STORM SEWER STREET RENOVATION STREET RENOVATION COLLECTION SYSTEMS ATHLETIC ACTIVITIES PROFESSIONAL SVC -OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION RECYCLING CHARGES RECYCLING CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS INSURANCE INSURANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL . CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL R55CKRE. 1G20000 CITY jINA Council Check Register 8/14/2008 8/14/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation Poll Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 24,549.00 312457 8/14/2008 102172 APPERT'S FOODSERVICE 796.49 FOOD 192088 1000343 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 796.49 312458 8/14/2008 100632 AQUA ENGINEERING 142.73 SPRINKLER PARTS 192264 26233 05476.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES 142.73 312459 8/14/2008 119645 ARCSTONE INFORMATION SERVICES 30.00 EBROCHURE 00006076 192089 12911 5410.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 30.00 312460 8/14/2008 123008 ARENDT, MARK 32.50 SOFTBALL GAME REFUND 192358 081108 4077.4390 REGISTRATION FEES 32.50 312461 8/14/2008 102774 ASPEN WASTE SYSTEMS 177.36 1- 146354 192265 080108 7411.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 33.95 192359 AUG012008 5821.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 40.27 192359 AUG012008 5111.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 54.63 192359 AUG012008 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 54.63 192359 AUG012008 5430.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 74.22 192359 AUG012008 5861.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 88.81 192359 AUG012008 1628.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 92.47 192359 AUG012008 1481.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 121.14 192359 AUG012008 1470.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 178.22 192359 AUG012008 5841.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 191.37 192359 AUG012008 5422.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 215.01 192359 AUG012008 1551.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 221.74 192359 AUG012008 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 244.72 192359 AUG012008 5511.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 254.07 192359 AUG012008 1301.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 254.08 192359 AUG012008 1552.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 260.55 192359 AUG012008 5311.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 302.24 192359 AUG012008 1645.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 417.07 192359 AUG012008 5420.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 571.16 192359 AUG012008 5620.6182 RUBBISH REMOVAL 3,847.71 312462 8/14/2008 100256 AT &T MOBILITY J8 8:36:26 Page - 2 Business Unit GRILL WM -476 HIGHLANDS AREA GOLF ADMINISTRATION EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION PSTF OCCUPANCY 50TH ST OCCUPANCY ART CENTER BLDG / MAINT LITTER REMOVAL RICHARDS GOLF COURSE VERNON OCCUPANCY SENIOR CITIZENS YORK FIRE STATION FIRE DEPT. GENERAL YORK OCCUPANCY MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CITY HALL GENERAL LITTER REMOVAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENT SVC PW BUILDING POOL OPERATION LITTER REMOVAL CLUB HOUSE EDINBOROUGH PARK R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/14/2008 -- 8/14/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO.# Doc No Inv No Account No 46.73 192090 072408 5420.6188 5422.6541 5913.6406. 5422.6541 5422.6541 5913.6406 5913.6103 5923.6136 5923.6136 5932.6103 1450.6103 1322.6406 1553.6530 5842.5512 5862.5512 5862.5515 5822.5512 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5515 5842.5513 Subledger Account Description TELEPHONE PLANTINGS & TREES GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANTINGS & TREES PLANTINGS & TREES GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES . PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS 8113/2008 8:36:26 Page 3 Business Unit CLUB HOUSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION COLLECTION SYSTEMS COLLECTION SYSTEMS GENERAL STORM SEWER ANIMAL CONTROL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 46.73 VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 312463 8/14/2008 50TH ST SELLING 100638 BACHMAN'S 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS,SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 14.48 'LILIUM 192169 072008 26.78, EDGING 192169 .072008 951.36 TREES 00006069 192170 5434 1,027.73 TREES 00006311 192171 5819 2,020.35 312464 8/1412008 100642 BANNERS TO GO 75.62 LETTERING FOR SIGNS 00001858 191963 26647 75.62 312465 8/14/2008 100643 BARR ENGINEERING CO. 184.00 NONDEGRADATION ASSESSMENT 192266 23271-105 -8 1,009.50 SANITARY SEWER COMP PLAN 192267 23271-106 -9 21136.74 SANITARY SEWER COMP PLAN 192268 23271-106 -10 165.00 STORM SEWER REVIEW 192269 2327354 -162 3,495.24 312466 8/14/2008 117353 BASSFORD REMELE 160.50 GENERAL LITIGATION 192270 123974 160.50 312467 8/14/2008 102195 - BATTERIES PLUS 31.94 BATTERY 00001962 191964 18- 214775 31.94 312468 8/1412008 102449 BATTERY WHOLESALE INC. ' 474.98 BATTERIES 00001970 192172 C6662 474.98 - 312469 8/14/2008 101355 BELLBOY CORPORATION 186.55 191905 45635900 26.00 191906 81150900 136.06 191906 81150900 107.55 191907 45635700 117.55 191908 45635800 346.85 191909 45635400 214.65 191910 81150800 460.40 191911 45645700 5422.6541 5913.6406. 5422.6541 5422.6541 5913.6406 5913.6103 5923.6136 5923.6136 5932.6103 1450.6103 1322.6406 1553.6530 5842.5512 5862.5512 5862.5515 5822.5512 5822.5513 5822.5513 5822.5515 5842.5513 Subledger Account Description TELEPHONE PLANTINGS & TREES GENERAL SUPPLIES PLANTINGS & TREES PLANTINGS & TREES GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES . PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS 8113/2008 8:36:26 Page 3 Business Unit CLUB HOUSE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION COLLECTION SYSTEMS COLLECTION SYSTEMS GENERAL STORM SEWER ANIMAL CONTROL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS,SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING R55CKREl )G20000 CITY INA L J8 8:36:26 Council Check Register Page - 4 8/14/2008 -- 8/14/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,334.48 191912 45635300 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 148.11 191913 81150600 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 264.55 192396 45635500 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 56.55 192397 45635600 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 32.90 192398 81113400 5862.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES VERNON SELLING 272.97 192398 81113400 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 3,705.17 312470 8/14/2008 100648 BERTELSON OFFICE PRODUCTS 28.69 STAPLER 191965 WO- 518908 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 15.08 OFFICE SUPPLIES 192091 WO- 518321 -1 1190.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ASSESSING 21.43 WRIST REST 192092 WO- 519345 -1 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 64.86 OFFICE SUPPLIES 192173 WO- 518293 -1 1400.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 33.29 OFFICE SUPPLIES 192174 WO- 518183 -1 1600.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 34.28 BINDING COVER 192271 WO- 519281 -1 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 174.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES 192272 WO- 519025 -1 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 372.43 312471 8/14/2008 101691 BETZEN GOLF SUPPLY CO. 462.51 GOLF TEES 192093 23608 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 462.51 312472 8/14/2008 101375 BLOOMINGTON SECURITY SOLUTIONS 279.90 REPLACE LOCK ON SAFE 192273 S60297 5821.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 279.90 312473 8/14/2008 122688 BMK SOLUTIONS 43.61 WASTEBASKETS 00003680 192175 42921.1 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 192.54 DESKTOP TOOLS WASTE CONTAINEUM3680 192176 42935 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 680.51 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00003680 192177 42921.1 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 916.66 312474 8/14/2008 119351 BOURGET IMPORTS 191914 91999 312475 8/14/2008 122318 BRAEMAR GOLF COURSE 140.00 COOKIES, LEMONADE, COFFEE 192274 1410 140.00 312476 8/14/2008 100664 BRAUN INTERTEC 896.75 CONCRETE TESTING 192275 295830 5842.5513 1513.6103 01229.1705.20 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONSULTING DESIGN EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS A -229 SOUTHVIEW LANE M&O R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/13/2008 8:36:26 Council Check Register Page- 5 8/14/2008 -- 8/14/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 1,988.00 CONCRETE & SOIL TESTING 192276 296379 01343.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -343 RICHMOND HILLS 2ND ADD 431.75 WELL HOUSE #3 TESTING 192277 295722 05483.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN WM -483 WELLHOUSE 5233 HALIFAX 273.50 MATERIAL TESTING 192278 295849 05436.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 1 ARDEN, BRUCE, CASCO WM 1,135.50 MATERIAL TESTING 192279 296023 01214.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN PHASE 2 DREXEL, WOODDALE, EDIN 560.00 MATERIAL TESTING . 192280 296024 01229.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN A -229 SOUTHVIEW LANE M80 5,285.50 312477 8/14/2008 104470 BRIDGESTONE GOLF INC. 189.60 GOLF BALLS 192094 1001548548 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS- PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 169.64 GOLF BALLS 192095 1001551081 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 183.62 GOLF BALLS 192096 1001553133 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 460.64 GOLF BALLS 192097 1001550642 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,003.50 312478 8/1412008 123009 BROWN, MIKE 32.50 SOFTBALL GAME REFUND 192360 081108 4077.4390 REGISTRATION FEES EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION 32.50 312479 8/14/2008 119826 BRYANT GRAPHICS INC. 167.38 EDINA LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 192098 14984 5862.6575 PRINTING VERNON SELLING 167.39 EDINA LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 192098 14984 5822.6575 PRINTING 50TH ST SELLING 167.39 EDINA LIQUOR NEWSLETTER 192098 14984 5842.6575 PRINTING YORK SELLING 502.16 312480 8114/2008 104595 BUCKENTINE, JOHN 155.96 UNIFORM PURCHASE 192178 080708 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 155.96 312481 8/1412008 114575 CALIFORNIA' CONTRACTORS SUPPLIE 117.00 FLARES 191966 82393 1400.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 117.00 312482 8/1412008 102149 CALLAWAY GOLF 143.59 GOLF BALLS 192099 916356613 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 231.94 GOLF CLUB 192100 916343853 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 226.06 GOLF CLUBS 192101 916036227 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES. 283.32 GOLF BALLS 192102 916116992 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 1,251.96 GOLF BALLS 192103 916101214 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES ' 436.20 GOLF BALLS 192104 916036226 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 109:76 GOLF CLUB 792105 916199483 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 79.49 GOLF CLUB 192106 916238989 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 112.00- CREDIT 192107 916185714 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETc- `LES R55CKRE, jG20000 CITY IINA 1 38 8:36:26 Council Check Register Page - 6 8/14/2008 8/14/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier I Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 929.01 GOLF CLUBS 192179 916393371 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 3,579.33 312483 8114/2008 119455 CAPITOL BEVERAGE SALES 1,151.40 191915 11983 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 29.30 191916 11982 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 8,060.40 191917 11981 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING - 38.45 192399 12076 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 7,240.30 192400 12077 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 389.60 192401 12079 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 38.45 192402 12078 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 16,947.90 312484 8/14/2008 116683 CAT & FIDDLE BEVERAGE 152.00 192403 79208 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 104.00 192404 79172 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 256.00 312485 8/14/2008 117187 CHEM SYSTEMS LTD 21305.02 TOWER TREATMENT 00008096 191967 514785 5521.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA ICE MAINT 2,305.02 312486 8/14/2008 100683 CHEMSEARCH 820.06 CONQUEST 00001882 192108 526516 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS CENT SVC PW BUILDING 820.06 312487 8114/2008 116353 CHIPPEWA GRAPHICS INC. 604.25 ENGINEERING PADS 192281 20568 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 604.25 312488 8/14/2008 120433 COMCAST 61.93 8772 15 614 0387019 192109 072508 5430.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 61.93 8772 15 614 0406553 192180 JUL2508 5420.6188 TELEPHONE CLUB HOUSE 123.86 312489 8/1412008 120826 COMCAST SPOTLIGHT 333.33 TV ADVERTISING 192110 335262 5822.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING 333.33 TV ADVERTISING 192110 335262 5842.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER YORK SELLING 333.34 TV ADVERTISING 192110 335262 5862.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING 1,000.00 312490 8/1412008 101395 COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/13/2008 8:36:26 Council Check Register Page - 7 8/14/2008 -- 8/14/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier /.Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description. Business Unit 309.70 CONCRETE PLANT INSPECTIONS 192282 PA000157301 01331.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -331 CONCORD: VALLEY VIEW 309.70 312491 8114/2008 102757 COMPUTERIZED FLEET ANALYSIS 895.50 CLASSROOM TRAINING 00001899 192111 28169 1281.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS TRAINING 895.50. 312492 8/1412008 101323 CONNEY SAFETY PRODUCTS 15.00: SAFETY GLASSES, GLOVES 00001940 192112 03313817 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 28.90 SAFETY GLASSES,, GLOVES 00001940 192112 03313817 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 28.91 SAFETY GLASSES, GLOVES 00001940 192112 03313817 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 28.91 SAFETY GLASSES, GLOVES 00001940 192112 03313817 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 53.25 SAFETY GLASSES, GLOVES 00001940 192112 03313817 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 92.42 - GLOVES 00001956 192283 03314833 1553.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 247.39 312493 8114/2008 106495 CONTROLS & METERS INC. 108.35 REGISTER REPAIR 00001686 191968 14807 5911.6530 REPAIR PARTS PUMP & LIFT STATION OPER 108.35 312494 8114/2008 103800 CORPORATE EXPRESS INC. 1,421.89 TONER CARTRIDGES 191969 89035521 1550.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 85.26 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001975 192113 89042566 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION 85.26 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001975 192113 89042566 1301.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL MAINTENANCE 85.26 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001975 192113 89042566 1646.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES BUILDING MAINTENANCE 223.89 OFFICE SUPPLIES 00001975 192113 89042566 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 1.901.56 312495 8/14/2008 100513 COVERALL10F THE TWIN CITIES IN 2,742.38 CUSTODIAL SERVICES 191970 7070133552 1551.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL 2,742.38 312496 .811412008 100699 CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER 104.14 114- 09855685 -4 WATER 192284 073108 7411.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES PSTF OCCUPANCY 104.14 312497 8/14/2008 100701 - CUSHMAN�MOTOR CO. .178.56 '• CLUTCH 00006181 192181 143634 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINTOF COURSE $GROUNDS 49.50 SOLENOID KIT 00006298 192182 143666 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 228.06 312498 8114/2008 104020 DALCO R55CKREk jG20000 CITY ,INA i J8 8:36:26 Council Check Register Page - 8 8/14/2008 -8/14/2008 Check # Dale Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 123.54 CAN LINERS 00008092 191971 2006858 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 146.97 RADIO BATTERIES 00008092 191972 2007014 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 355.71 TISSUE, WYPALL 00008092 191973 2005453 5511.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 252.52 SOAP, LINERS, CLEANER 00001921 192114 2007103 1552.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 878.74 312499 8/14/2008 117387 DATARADIO COR LTD 229.79 RADIO REPAIR 00001665 191974 10004251 5914.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS TANKS TOWERS 8 RESERVOIR 229.79 312500 8114/2008 123012 DAVIS, NORA 3,965.00 DRIVEWAY DAMAGE REPAIRS 192361 073108 01338.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -338 SOUTHDALE 1ST ADDITION 3,965.00 312501 8/14/2008 102478 DAY DISTRIBUTING 1,329.55 191918 467329 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,137.20 191919 467330 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 2,042.95 192405 468264 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 5,654.60 192406 468316 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 6,678.75 192407 468265 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 19,843.05 312502 8/14/2008 102455 DEALER AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES INC 41.78 WELDMENT 00001719 191975 4- 111933 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2.13 BAL DUE 00001719 191976 4- 111932BAL 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 43.91 312503 8/14/2008 104940 DEFENSIVE EDGE 150.00 HANDGUARDS 191977 151 1400.6551 AMMUNITION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 150.00 312504 8/1412008 100718 DELEGARD TOOL CO. 315.15 WRENCHES, PLIERS 00001739 192285 308572 1553.6556 TOOLS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 315.15 312505 8/1412008 100720 DENNYS 5TH AVE. BAKERY 65.72 BAKERY 192115 279283 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 167.75 BAKERY 192116 279284 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 68.33 BAKERY 192117 279285 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 66.77 BAKERY 192118 279691 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 32.13 BAKERY 192183 279771 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 400.70 R55CKREG LOG20000 8/14/2008 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 570.41 PAINT 00001900 8/14/2008 -- 8/14/2008 802105083 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 312506 8/14/2008 00001555 100899 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR $ INDUSTRY 802104261 1 1335.6532 7,057.01 JULY. 2008 192119 4660053060 1495.4380 SURCHARGE - 7,057.01 802104265 1335.6532 312507 8/14/2008 1,579.18 102831 DEX EAST PAINT 00001479 192289 802104264 353.00 191978 110311867 -7108. 5610.6122 ADVERTISING OTHER 22.00 191979 110311893 -7/08 5430.6188 TELEPHONE 137.00 8/14/2008 191979 110311893 -7/08 5511.6188 TELEPHONE 316.00 191979 110311893 -7108 5420.6188 TELEPHONE 312508 8/14/2008 100571 DIAMOND VOGEL PAINTS. 570.41 PAINT 00001900 192286 .. 802105083 1335.6532 570.41. PAINT 00001555 192287 802104261 1 1335.6532 .2,346.51 PAINT 00001555 192288 802104265 1335.6532 1,579.18 PAINT 00001479 192289 802104264 1335.6532 5,066.51 312509 8/14/2008 101668. DIE BAVARIAN MUSIKMEISTERS 150.00 PERFORMANCE 8/20/08 192355 081108 5610.6136 150.00 312510 8/1412008 112663 DOLLARS $ SENSE 716.66 - COUPON ADVERTISING 192120 23489 5822.6122 716.66 COUPON ADVERTISING 192120 23489 5842.6122 716.68 COUPON ADVERTISING 192,120 23489 5862.6122 2,150.00 312511 i 8/14/2008 100739 EAGLE WINE 41.05 191920 91045 5842.5515 606.94 191921 91046 5842.5513 242.04 192408 94435 5822.5513 1,864.45 192409 92858 5842.5513 125.74 192410 94439 5842.5513 3,072.00 192411 92852 5862.5513 1,188.55 192412 94430 5862.5513 7,140.77 312512 8114/2008 100740 EARL F. ANDERSEN INC. 154.51 PAINT 00001909 191980 0083477 -IN 1335.6532 154.51 PAINT PAINT PAINT PAINT 8/13/2008 8:36:26 Page- 9 Business Unit INSPECTIONS ED ADMINISTRATION RICHARDS GOLF COURSE ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS CLUB HOUSE PAVEMENT MARKINGS PAVEMENT MARKINGS PAVEMENT MARKINGS PAVEMENT MARKINGS PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION ADVERTISING OTHER 50TH ST SELLING ADVERTISING.OTHER YORK SELLING ADVERTISING OTHER VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE PAINT YORK SELLING YORK SELLING, 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING PAVEMENT MARKINGS R55CKREL jG20000 2,239.16 SCADA SYSTEM SUPPORT 191983 CITY MINA PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER 5,971.10 SCADA SYSTEM SUPPORT 191983 Council Check Register 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 6,717.48 8/14/2008 -- 8114/2008 5923.6136 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Suhledger Account Description 312513 8/14/2008 8/1412008 122387 ECOLAB 122861 ENTERTAINMENT PLUS 432.58 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00003683 192184 6500918 1470.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 432.58 205.00 312514 811412008 8/14/2008 101630 EDINA PUBLIC SCHOOLS 100752 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. 27.00 PERMIT #29372 GYM USE 191981 7164 1600.4390.04 NATURE CAMP GENERAL STORM SEWER 27.00 4,180.13 GRATES, RINGS, GLUE 00005757 192186 LL3422 5932.6536 CASTINGS 312515 811412008 103594 EDINALARM INC. 312520 268.38 ALARM SERVICE 192121 49727 5821.6250 ALARM SERVICE 549.54 ALARM SERVICE 192121 49727 5861.6250 ALARM SERVICE VERNON SELLING 555.93 ALARM SERVICE 192121 49727 5841.6250 ALARM SERVICE 312521 1,373.85 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 312516 811412008 100747 ELSMORE AQUATIC JOINT KITS 00001732 191984 6- 1061010 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 60.55 LIFEGUARD SUIT 191982 9582 5311.6201 LAUNDRY 60.55 312517 8114/2008 106194 EMA INC. L J8 8:36:26 Page - 10 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY VERNON OCCUPANCY YORK OCCUPANCY POOL OPERATION 2,239.16 SCADA SYSTEM SUPPORT 191983 5604 - 90013347 5932.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL STORM SEWER 5,971.10 SCADA SYSTEM SUPPORT 191983 5604- 90013347 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 6,717.48 SCADA SYSTEM SUPPORT 191983 5604- 90013347 5923.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER COLLECTION SYSTEMS 14,927.74 312518 8/1412008 122861 ENTERTAINMENT PLUS 205.00 SPLASH JAM BALANCE 192385 081108 5311.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POOL OPERATION 205.00 312519 8/14/2008 100752 ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC. 2,481.72 GRATES, SEALS 00005757 192185 LL3263 5932.6536 CASTINGS GENERAL STORM SEWER 4,180.13 GRATES, RINGS, GLUE 00005757 192186 LL3422 5932.6536 CASTINGS GENERAL STORM SEWER 6,661.85 312520 8/14/2008 104195 EXTREME BEVERAGE LLC. 315.00 192413 697401 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 315.00 312521 8/14/2008 100146 FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY 190.78 JOINT KITS 00001732 191984 6- 1061010 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 190.78 R55CKREG LOG20000 SHOES '192124 4943063 CITY OF EDINA COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 12,661.83 36.45 Council Check Register 312526 8/14/2008 120820 FOREFRONT 312529 8/14/200.8 811412008 -- 8/14/2008 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 312522 811412008 PULL CARTS . 102485 FAHRENKRUG, ROGER 1092493 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 645.23 100.00 GIFT CERTIFICATE LESSON 192122 080508 5401.4602 LESSONS 8/14/2008 312527 8/14/2008 100.00 312523 8/14/2008 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 100297 FAST FOTO &DIGITAL .080508 5610.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE - 164.63 SAFETY CAMP PHOTOS 191985 8326063 -T2 -2670 1600.4390.06 SAFETY CAMP 75 - 164.63 ' 312524 8114/2008 104474 FILTERFRESH 210.34 COFFEE 00001980 .192123 79470830 1552.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES - 210.34 312525 8/1412008 101475 FOOTJOY 8/13/2008 8:36:26 Page - 11 Business Unit GOLF REVENUES PARK ADMIN. GENERAL CENT SVC PW BUILDING 12,661.83 SHOES '192124 4943063 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 12,661.83 36.45 SHOP_ TOWELS 192188 1006044484 5422.6201 LAUNDRY 312526 8/14/2008 120820 FOREFRONT 312529 8/14/200.8 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 64.73 MERCHANDISE 192125 1093228 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 580.50 PULL CARTS . 192126 1092493 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 645.23 1,366.24 312531 - 8/14/2008 312527 8/14/2008 118456 FULTON, LAURA. 162.84- MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 192187 .080508 5610.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE ED ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION STREET NAME SIGNS 1,510.90 JULY 2008 SERVICE 00001693 192189 8070454 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 1,510.90 162.84 312528 8/1412008 100764 G & K SERVICES 36.45 SHOP_ TOWELS 192188 1006044484 5422.6201 LAUNDRY 36.45 312529 8/14/200.8 100775 GENERAL SPORTS CORPORATION 718.75 SOFTBALL T- SHIRTS 191986 76921 4077.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 718.75 312530 8/1412008 101156 GOPHER SIGN CO. 1,366.24 -U -POSTS 00001966 191987 76048 1325.6531 SIGNS & POSTS 1,366.24 312531 - 8/14/2008 100780 GOPHER STATE ONE -CALL INC. MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS EDINA ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION STREET NAME SIGNS 1,510.90 JULY 2008 SERVICE 00001693 192189 8070454 5913.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES DISTRIBUTION 1,510.90 R55CKREt. jG20000 CITY )INA Council Check Register 8/14/2008 -- 8/14/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 312532 8/14/2008 102645 GRAFFITI CONTROL SERVICES 212.00 GRAFFITI REMOVAL 00001971 192127 264 1301.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 212.00 312533 8/14/2008 100781 GRAFIX SHOPPE L J8 8:36:26 Page - 12 Business Unit GENERAL MAINTENANCE 1,672.65 CROWN VIC KITS 192190 60046 1400.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SVC PW BUILDING DISTRIBUTION GENERAL MAINTENANCE CITY HALL GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CLUB HOUSE YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK OCCUPANCY LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 134.89 FAUCET REPAIR 192290 141113 05464.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -464 TODD PARK NHOOD 134.89 312539 8/14/2008 102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES 198.32 GOLF BALLS, TEES 00006444 192130 37936 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 198.32 1,672.65 312534 8/14/2008 101103 GRAINGER 110.17 TARP STRAPS, BATTERIES 00001948 191988 9699864907 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 47.80 FANS 00001930 191989 9697621986 1552.6530 REPAIR PARTS 38.11 HAMMER 00001912 191990 9694350761 5913.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 20.86 BIT SET 00001920 191991 9695703091 1301.6556 TOOLS 25.39 LAMPHOLDERS 00001920 191991 9695703091 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 75.30 COUPLERS 00006301 192191 9694770299 5422.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 41.60 LIGHT BULBS 00006068 192192 9697621994 5420.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 359.23 312535 8/1412008 102217 GRAPE BEGINNINGS INC 902.75 191922 102340 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 208.50 192414 102642 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,111.25 312536 8/14/2008 101518 GRAUSAM, STEVE 95.80 BATTERIES FOR COMPUTER BACKUPS 192362 081108 5841.6530 REPAIR PARTS 106.85 OFFICE CHAIR, PAPER 192362 081108 5840.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 141.06 BATTERIES FOR COMPUTER BACKUPS 192362 081108 5821.6530 REPAIR PARTS 343.71 312537 811412008 100783 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO. INC. 6,897.05 LIGHT POLES 00001083 192128 935596436 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER 5,050.14 LIGHT POLES 00001083 192129 935276929 1322.6185 LIGHT & POWER 11,947.19 312538 811412008 119787 GREEN LAWN UNDERGROUND SPRINKL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN CENT SVC PW BUILDING DISTRIBUTION GENERAL MAINTENANCE CITY HALL GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CLUB HOUSE YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK OCCUPANCY LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 50TH ST OCCUPANCY STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL 134.89 FAUCET REPAIR 192290 141113 05464.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -464 TODD PARK NHOOD 134.89 312539 8/14/2008 102125 GREG LESSMAN SALES 198.32 GOLF BALLS, TEES 00006444 192130 37936 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 198.32 R55CKREG LOG20000 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES CITY OF EDINA 1260.6577 LUMBER 312542 Council Check Register 102060 HALLOCK COMPANY INC 8/14/2008 -- 8/14/2008 Check # Date Amount - Supplier 1. Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 312541 8/14/2008 100782 GRIGGS COOPER & CO. 62.63 2,049.85 191923 :91047 5842.5513 5,887.20 191924 92791 5842.5512 REGISTER TAPE 7,260.53 191925 91048 5842.5512 185.15 366.60 191926 72480 5842.5512 4.60- 191927 757388 5842.5512 312544 131.95- 191928 757116 5842.5512 122.15- 191929 757387 5842.5512 191994 61.10- 191930 757389 5842.5513 TONKAZORB, 00005755 196.61 192415 94443 5842.5515 4,781.70 2,579.70 192416 94220 5842.5512 8/14/2008 211.25 192417 94436 5822.5513 538.93- 192418 94438 5822.5512 544211 2,579.70 192419 84221. 5862.5512 6,595.98 192420 94433 5862.5512 16,568.78 192421 94442 5842.5512 1,310.95 192422 94440 5842.5513 277.65 192423 94431 5862.5513 317.70 192424 92854 5862.5513 2,457.70 192425 92855 5862.5513 67.64- 192426 757732 5842.5513 105.10_' 192427 757733 5822.5512 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST. OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 5860.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 5913.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES 48,706.59 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES 1260.6577 LUMBER 312542 8/1412008 102060 HALLOCK COMPANY INC 62.63 3- PHASE'VOLTi 00001913 191992 43689 -1 62.63 312543 8/14/2008 102320 'HAMCO DATA PRODUCTS 61.72 REGISTER TAPE 191993 260670 185.15 - REGISTER TAPE 00007516 192291 .260690 246.87 - 312544 8/14/2008 100797 HAWKINS'INC. 2,390.85 TONKAZORB'" 00005755 191994 1214159 2,390.85 TONKAZORB, 00005755 191995 1212756 4,781.70 312545 8/14/2008 116838 HAYES INSTRUMENT CO INC 283.76 TAPE, PAINT, FLAGGING 192292,- 544211 283.76 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR COST. OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 5921.6530 REPAIR PARTS 5822.6512 PAPER SUPPLIES 5860.6513 OFFICE SUPPLIES 5913.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES 5913.6586 WATER TREATMENT SUPPLIES 1260.6577 LUMBER 8/13/2008 8:36:26 Page 13 YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING YORK. SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING LIFT STATION MAINT 50TH ST SELLING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION ENGINEERING GENERAL R55CKRE )G20000 2,413.86 CITY TINA 312549 8114/2008 Council Check Register 8/14/2008 8/14/2008 REPLACE CYLINDER ON CHAIR Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 312546 8/14/2008 192194 121601 HEARTLAND DISTRIBUTION LLC EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 117,417.04 244.95 TIRES 00001727 191996 011761 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 214.15 TIRES 00001731 191997 011808 1553.6583 TIRES & TUBES 312550 459.10 102079 HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC 312547 811412008 101576 HEGGIES PIZZA WATER SERVICE REPAIR 00001688 191999 12325 5913.6180 98.80 PIZZA 192131 1021687 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 98.80 312551 8/14/2008 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 312548 8/14/2008 100801 HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 36.38 CLEANING SUPPLIES 08 8:36:26 Page - 14 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN GRILL 2,413.86 JUNE 2008 192193 2008 6 -EDINA 1195.6225 BOARD & ROOM PRISONER LEGAL SERVICES CITY HALL GENERAL FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION DISTRIBUTION ED ADMINISTRATION 125.00 PERFORMANCE 8/21/08 192356 081108 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 125.00 312553 811412008 100805 HIRSHFIELD'S 421.63 SEALER , 00001901 192000 026253952 5913.6532 PAINT DISTRIBUTION 137.80 SEALER, PAINT SUPPLIES 00001896 192001 003300432 5913.6532 PAINT DISTRIBUTION 559.43 312554 811412008 103360 HODGE, AUDREY 109.95 TRAINING EXPENSES 192293 080608 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 109.95 312555 8/1412008 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 450.00 191931 459753 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 2,413.86 312549 8114/2008 115377 HENRICKSEN PSG 55.00 REPLACE CYLINDER ON CHAIR 191998 413378 1551.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 61,736.88 STATION 1 FURNISHINGS 192194 413376 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 117,417.04 STATION 1 FURNISHINGS 192195 413377 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 179,208.92 312550 8/14/2008 102079 HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC 525.77 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 00001688 191999 12325 5913.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 525.77 312551 8/14/2008 103753 HILLYARD INC - MINNEAPOLIS 36.38 CLEANING SUPPLIES 00002162 192196 2501537 5610.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 36.38 312552 8114/2008 101271 HINDING, CHRIS CITY HALL GENERAL FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION DISTRIBUTION ED ADMINISTRATION 125.00 PERFORMANCE 8/21/08 192356 081108 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 125.00 312553 811412008 100805 HIRSHFIELD'S 421.63 SEALER , 00001901 192000 026253952 5913.6532 PAINT DISTRIBUTION 137.80 SEALER, PAINT SUPPLIES 00001896 192001 003300432 5913.6532 PAINT DISTRIBUTION 559.43 312554 811412008 103360 HODGE, AUDREY 109.95 TRAINING EXPENSES 192293 080608 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 109.95 312555 8/1412008 104375 HOHENSTEINS INC. 450.00 191931 459753 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/13/2008 8:36:26 Council Check Register . Page - 15 8/14/2008 8/14/2008 Check # Date ; Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No - Subledger Account Description Business Unit 836.50 192428 460457 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 1,286.50 312556 8/14/2008 117853 HOLIDAY INN EXPRESS SUPERIOR 69:13 LODGING - M. LIMBECK 192197 42983/2852 1400.6104 CONFERENCES 8 SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 69.13 312557 8/14/2008 101774 HONEYWELL INC. 9,551.68 MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE 192294 3400237 5620.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT EDINBOROUGH'PARK 27,185.57 MECHANICAL' MAINTENANCE 192294 3400237 5510.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ARENA ADMINISTRATION 36,737.25 312558 8/14/2008 100814 INDELCO PLASTICS.CORP. 89.68 PVC, COUPLINGS` 00001783 192002 530356. 1643.6530 REPAIR PARTS GENERAL TURF CARE 89.68 312559 8/14/2008 122955 INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR 243.99 CD /DVD -FIRE TRUCK TOUGHBOOK 00004360 192386 1100037930 1470.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 687.30 CD /DVD- AMBULANCE TOUGHBOOKfl0004360 192387 1100037931 1470.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL r 10,330.50 TOUGHBOOKS FOR AMBULANCES 00004360 192388 1100040208 1470.6710 , EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 3,667.33 TOUGHBOOK FOR FIRE TRUCK 00004360 192389 1100040404 1470.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE DEPT. GENERAL _ 14,929.12 312560 8114/2008 102640 IPMA -HR 345.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES 192295 24143907 1120.6105 DUES 8 SUBSCRIPTIONS ADMINISTRATION 345.00 312561 8/14/2008 100202 JAMAR TECHNOLOGIES INC. 155.82 EPDM TUBES 00005935 192296 90167 1260.6406 / GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 155.82: 312562 8/14/2008 103067 JENSON, THOMAS 170.89 POWER STRIPS 192198 080608 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 170.89 312563 8/14/2008 102136 JERRY'S TRANSMISSION SERVICE 559.33 SPEAKER HOUSE, SIREN DRIVERS 00001752 192003 0011595 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 57.19 ROTARY, LATCH 00001738 192004 0011591 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 100.18 SWITCHES, COVERS 00005078 192297 0011616 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 716.70 312564 8/14/2008 100741 JJ TAYLOR DIST. OF MINN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY . iNA B, J8 8:36:26 Council Check Register Page - 16 8 /14/2008 -- 8/14/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier 1 Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 3,753.52 191932 1192224 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 99.20 191933 1192226 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 53.50 191934 1192234 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 9,513.00 191935 1192233 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 113.00 192132 1191721 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 334.20 192133 1196419 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 81.50 192429 1192281 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 9,546.15 192430 1192280 5842.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER YORK SELLING 34.50 192431 1192274 5822.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING 5,348.32 192432 1192273 5822.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 4,660.15 192433 1192271 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 33,537.04 312566 811412008 100835 JOHNSON BROTHERS LIQUOR CO. 434.35 191936 1480832 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,147.78 191937 1480657 5642.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 573.66 191938 1480447 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 10,143.61 191939 1480437 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 64.98 191940 1480439 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,473.22 191941 1480446 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,282.92 191942 1480443 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 758.04 191943 1480656 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 839.55 191944 1480445 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.12 191945 1480438 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 2,982.38 191946 1480444 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 180.62 192434 1484339 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 2,792.93 192435 1484351 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,982.49 192436 1484348 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,705.59 192437 1480658 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 36.11 192438 1484352 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 36.11 192439 1484347 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 2,126.79 192440 1484344 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 2,089.89 192441 1484340 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 180.62 192442 1484337 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 3.36 192443 1484345 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,353.72 192444 1484343 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 838.35 192445 1484346 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.12 192446 1484338 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,853.56 192447 1484341 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 139.63 192448 1484332 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 561.22 192449 1484336 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/13/2008 8:36:26 Council Check Register Page - 17 8/14/2008 -- 811412008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 317.46 192450 1484333 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 384.44 192451 1484334 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 536.85 192452 1484335 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,030.77 192453 1484350 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 614.42 192454 1484349 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 426.90 192455 1484353 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.12 192456 1476827 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1.12- 192457 387006 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 35.62- 192458 387742 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 41, 858.94 312567 8/14/2008 104369 KARKHOFF, NANCY 59.02 UNIFORM PURCHASE 192298 080608 1400.6203 UNIFORM ALLOWANCE POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 59.02 312568 8/14/2008 103885 KEY COLLISION & PAINT CENTER 44.00 AUTO BODY REPAIR 192299 RO:B144550 01343.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS BA -343 RICHMOND HILLS 2ND ADD 44.00 312569 8114/2008 106357 KIDS PLACE 14.09 PARTIAL REFUND 192134 080608 5300.2039 SALES & USE TAX PAYABLE AQUATIC CENTER BALANCE SHEET 211.99 PARTIAL REFUND 192134 080608 5301.4541 GENERAL ADMISSIONS AQUATIC CENTER REVENUES 226.08 312570 8/14/2008 100198 KIRCHMAN, STEVE A. 15.00 PARKING 192199 080608 1495.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSPECTIONS 92.30 CELL PHONE CHARGES 192199 080608 1495.6188 TELEPHONE INSPECTIONS 107.30 312571 .8/1412008 105887 KOESSLER, JOE 168.00 JULY 2008 SERVICE 192300 070108 1628.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SENIOR CITIZENS 168.00 312572 8/1412008 116776 KUSTOM KARRIERS 117.32 DWI TOW 192200 080708 4601.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE. FORFEITURE 117.32 312573 8/14/2008 118660 LAKES AREA HOME IMPROVEMENT SE 110.75 REPLACE LAWN FAUCET 192301 4216 05476.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -476 HIGHLANDS AREA 110.75 - 312574 8/14/2008 100852 LAWSON PRODUCTS INC. R55CKREG LOG20000 783.32 CITY . MINA 312577 Council Check Register 100854 LEITNER COMPANY 8/14/2008 -- 8/14/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanatlon PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 127.09 WASHERS, NUTS, SCREWS 00001906 192005 7102567 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS 127.09 312578 8114/2008 312575 8/14/2008. 101552 LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 1,905.69 HOME INS 192363 109858A1 -6/08 1470.6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 236.60 HOME INS 192364 114833A1 -6/08 1470.6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 6,776.08 HOME INS 192365 116093A1 -6/08 1400.6045 WORKERS COMPENSATION 8,918.37 312576 8/14/2008 113952 LEICA GEOSYSTEMS INC. 118608 M SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 81 J8 8:36:26 Page - 18 Business Unit EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 783.32 SURVEY EQUIPMENT HOLDER 192302 92400423 1260.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT ENGINEERING GENERAL MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING FINANCE YORK SELLING POOL CONCESSIONS 2,520.00 ERT CONFERENCE 192135 080408 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,520.00 312583 8/14/2008 100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 101.02 COUPLERS 00001737 192303 2085033 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 101.02 783.32 312577 8/1412008 100854 LEITNER COMPANY 622.81 TOP DRESSING 00006464 192201 197697 5422.6543 SOD & BLACK DIRT 622.81 312578 8114/2008 117407 LEXISNEXIS 205.00 BACKGROUND CHECKS 192006 1297361 - 2008073 1400.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1 205.00 312579 8114/2008 118608 M SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 18.00 WINE SPECTATOR 192008 902247 5822.6105 DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 18.00 312580 8/14/2008 122036 M -K GRAPHICS 562.76 PAYROLL CHECKS 192202 5399 1160.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 562.76 312581 8114/2008 112577 M. AMUNDSON LLP 1,563.81 191947 43631 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 297.51 CANDY 192007 43735 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD 1,861.32 312582 8/14/2008 103286 M.T.O.A. MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 50TH ST SELLING FINANCE YORK SELLING POOL CONCESSIONS 2,520.00 ERT CONFERENCE 192135 080408 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 2,520.00 312583 8/14/2008 100864 MAC QUEEN EQUIP INC. 101.02 COUPLERS 00001737 192303 2085033 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 101.02 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERVICES` 1 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST. OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 8/13/2008 8:36:26 Page - 19 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING GRILL 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESS IONAL-SVC - OTHER CONTRACTED REPAIRS, GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES MATERIALS /SUPPLIES MATERIALS /SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION CITY HALL GENERAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GENERAL MAINTENANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS WM -462 WOODHILL WM -462 WOODHILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA ' Council Check Register 8/14/2008 8/14/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 312584 8/14/2008 114699 MANAGED SERVICES INC.. 471.84 JANITORIAL.SERVICE 192304 'C002601 7411.6103 471.84 312585 8/1412008 100868 MARK VII SALES 2,193.42 _. 191948 357470. 5822.5514 4,947.15 191949 355879 5842.5514 3,432.06 191950 357685 5842.5514 436.00 192203 359665 5421.5514 3,524.79 192459 360342 5822.5514 40.00 192460 360343 5822.5515 2,942.02 _.192461 357704 5862.5514 5,076.40 192462 358614 5842.5514 22,591.84 312586 8114/2008 103280 MARLIN COMPANY, THE 547.10 COMMUNICATIONS PROGRAM 00001965 192009 447692 1280.6105 547.10 312587 .8114/2008. 100869 MARTIN- MCALLISTER 400.00 PERSONNEL ASSESSMENT 192204 6168 1400.6103 400.00 312588 8114/2008 .101327 MEDICINE SHOW BAND, THE 600.00 PERFORMANCE.8 /17/08 192350 081108 5610.6136 600.00 312589 8/14/2008 .122991 MEIER, ROGER 195.00 CLEAN INTERIOR ART WINDOW 192136 073108 1551.6180 195.00 312590 8/14/2008 101483 - MENARDS, -. - 34.10 ROUNDUP, BRUSHES 00008098 192010 58007 5511.6406 10.16 GROMMETS, BITS 00001941 192137 58355 1301.6556 17.28. WASP & HORNET SPRAY 00006099 192138 55902 5410.6406 94.86 RAKES 00006294 192205 55103 5422.6406 156.40 312591 8114/2008 102281 MENARDS ' 126.27 WATER HOSES 00004121 192305 80907 05462:1705.31 60.29 WATER HOSES 00004121 192306 80969 05462.1705.31 Subledger Account Description PROFESSIONAL SERVICES` 1 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX COST. OF GOODS SOLD BEER COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 8/13/2008 8:36:26 Page - 19 Business Unit PSTF OCCUPANCY 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING YORK SELLING GRILL 50TH ST SELLING 50TH ST SELLING VERNON SELLING YORK SELLING DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS SUPERVISION & OVERHEAD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL PROFESS IONAL-SVC - OTHER CONTRACTED REPAIRS, GENERAL SUPPLIES TOOLS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES MATERIALS /SUPPLIES MATERIALS /SUPPLIES ED ADMINISTRATION CITY HALL GENERAL ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GENERAL MAINTENANCE GOLF ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS WM -462 WOODHILL WM -462 WOODHILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY, ANA Council Check Register 8/14/2008 — 8114/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 122.50 PVC PIPE 00004119 192307 78908 01343.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES & J8 8:36:26 Page - 20 Business Unit BA -343 RICHMOND HILLS 2ND ADD EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SAC CHARGES SEWER SERVICE METRO REPAIR PARTS INSPECTIONS SEWER TREATMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CARS GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION WATER PURCHASED DISTRIBUTION 309.06 312592 8/1412008 100885 METRO SALES INC 343.00 MAINTENANCE CONTRACT 192206 295989 1470.6215 343.00 312593 8/14/2008 100886 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL 1,806.75 JULY 2008 192140 080508 1495.4307 1,806.75 312594 8/14/2008 100887 METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ENVIRONME 311,064.51 SEWER SERVICE 192011 0000878857 5922.6302 311,064.51 312595 8/1412008 102729 METROPOLITAN FORD OF EDEN PRAI 242.87 SHAFT, BEARINGS, SEALS 00001150 192207 460028FOW 1553.6530 242.87 312596 8/14/2008 100692 MIDWEST COCA -COLA BOTTLING CO. 307.80 192463 0148293205 5822.5515 307.80 312597 8/14/2008 103186 MIDWEST FUELS 861.00 DIESEL 00005252 192208 49081 5422.6581 1,459.15 GASOLINE 00006463 192209 49080 5423.6406 719.65 DIESEL 00005252 192210 49140 5422.6581 1,531.66 GASOLINE 00006463 192211 49139 5422.6581 4,571.46 312598 8/14/2008 101542 MILTONA TURF PRODUCTS 394.49 GREENS TOOLS 00006217 192212 201767 5422.6406 394.49 312599 8/14/2008 100913 MINNEAPOLIS & SUBURBAN SEWER & 1,980.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 00001687 192012 33209 5913.6180 2,640.00 WATER SERVICE REPAIR 00001691 192139 33217 5913.6180 4,620.00 312600 8/1412008 103216 MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPARTMENT 36,374.72 WATER PURCHASED 192213 080408 5913.6601 36,374.72 & J8 8:36:26 Page - 20 Business Unit BA -343 RICHMOND HILLS 2ND ADD EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL SAC CHARGES SEWER SERVICE METRO REPAIR PARTS INSPECTIONS SEWER TREATMENT EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 50TH ST SELLING GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES GOLF CARS GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GASOLINE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION CONTRACTED REPAIRS DISTRIBUTION WATER PURCHASED DISTRIBUTION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/14/2008 -- 8/14/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 312601 8/1412008 102174 MINNEAPOLIS OXYGEN COMPANY 17.83 CARBON DIOXIDE 00006428 192214 R107080128 5421.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 17.83 312602 6/14/2008 106193.. MINNESOTA HIGHWAY SAFETY AND Business Unit GRILL 8/13/2008 8:36:26 Page - - 21 366.00 CLASS FEE 192013 662 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 366.00 312603 6/14/2008 101376 MINNESOTA PIPE & EQUIPMENT 2,268.45 HYDRANT PARTS 00001692 192014 0227348 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 1,122.50 HYDRANT PARTS;., 00001688 192015 0227346 5913.6530 REPAIR PARTS DISTRIBUTION 8,319.01 3/4" WATER METERS 00001694 192366 0228047 5914.5516 COST OF GOODS SOLD METERS. TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 2,737.80 METER BATTERIES 00005697 192367 0226890 5914.6530 REPAIR PARTS TANKS TOWERS &RESERVOIR 545.30 BATTERIES 00001695 192368 0228048 5914.6530 REPAIR PARTS TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 11,896.04 WATER METERS, COUPLINGS 00001695 192368 0228048 5914.5516 COST OF GOODS SOLD METERS TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 26,889.10 312604 8/14/2008 112908 MINNESOTA ROADWAYS CO. 954.93 CRS II 00005753 192215 57930 1301.6519 ROAD OIL GENERAL MAINTENANCE 954.93 312605 8/14/2008 100908 MINNESOTA WANNER CO. 102.78 REPAIRS 00001149 192016 0077692 -IN 1553.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 102.78 312606 8/1412008 121398 MMRF #3660 40.00 TRAINING - LUTZ 192141 080408 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 40.00 312607 8/14/2008_ 114506 MN GIS /LIS CONSORTIUM 235.00 CONFERENCE - REBECCA FOSTER 192370 080808 1260.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS ENGINEERING GENERAL 235.00 312608 8/14/2008 104959 MOGCK, HEIDI 433.03 OVERPAYMENT REFUND 192369 080608 5900.2015 CUSTOMER REFUND UTILITY BALANCE SHEET 433.03 312609 8/14/2008 108668 MORRIS, GRAYLYN 175.00 PERFORMANCE 8/19/08 192354 081108 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION 175.00 r R55CKREG LOG20000 8/14/2008 CITY . ANA Council Check Register 230.00 ALARM SYSTEM REPAIR 00002011 192017 8/14/2008 -- 8/1412008 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 312610 8/14/2008 100906 MTI DISTRIBUTING INC. 8/1412008 102888 NORTHERN DOOR COMPANY 108.07 VT ADAPTERS 192216 631428 -00 5431.6530 REPAIR PARTS 77.36 EXTERNAL ANTENNA 192217 630810 -00 5422.6611 IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT 678.03 WHEEL MOTOR 00006306 192218 633047 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 633.80 FAIRWAY BEDKNIFE 00006306 192219 632983 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 35.62 SWITCH 00006306 192220 632983 -01 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 33.57 HOSEBARB ASSEMBLY 00006296 192221 631325 -00 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS 1,566.45 100712 NORTHERN WATER WORKS SUPPLY 312611 8/14/2008 100076 NEW FRANCE WINE CO. METER ADAPTERS 00001682 192018 501156288.001 489.00 192464 50682 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 516.50 S01154436.001 192465 50683 5842.5513 _ COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,621.50 00001609 192466 50674 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 312812 8/14/2008 122989 NISCAYAH INC. 230.00 ALARM SYSTEM REPAIR 00002011 192017 SV0021919 5610.6230 230.00 312613 8/1412008 102888 NORTHERN DOOR COMPANY 690.14 DOOR REPAIRS 192222 37118 1470.6180 1,871.36 DOOR REPAIRS 192223 37223 1470.6180 1,669.26 DOOR REPAIRS 192224 37117 1470.6180 4,230.76 312614 8/14/2008 100712 NORTHERN WATER WORKS SUPPLY 261.02 METER ADAPTERS 00001682 192018 501156288.001 5913.6406 1,238.38 ADAPTERS 00001847 192019 S01154436.001 6913.6406 3,770.62 LOCKING LIDS 00001609 192020 S01157281.001 5913.6406 5,270.02 312615 8114/2008 105901 OERTEL ARCHITECTS 3,105.26 WELL HOUSE #20 PROJECT 192308 #6 05480.1705.21 3,105.26 312616 8/14/2008 100936 OLSEN COMPANIES 55.23 SHOVELS 00001932 192021 513807 5932.6406 55.23 312617 8/14/2008 101718 PARTS PLUS 2,100.09 AUTO PARTS 192022 073108 1553.6530 2,100.09 81 J8 8:36:26 Page - 22 Business Unit RICHARDS GC MAINTENANCE MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT ED ADMINISTRATION CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS CONTRACTED REPAIRS GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION DISTRIBUTION CONSULTING INSPECTION WM480 NEW WELL #20 PHASE 2 GENERAL SUPPLIES REPAIR PARTS GENERAL STORM SEWER EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/14/2008 8/14/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier /Explanation - PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 312618 8114/2008 100347 PAUSTIS & SONS YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 312619 956.90 191951. 8192460 -IN 5842.5513 3,818.01 192467 8193133 -IN 5842.5513 1,126.50 192468 8193143 -IN 5862.5513 46.00- 192469 8192728 -CM 5822.5513 8/13/2008 8:36:26 Page - 23 Subledger Account Description Business Unit 5,855.41 YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 312619 8114/2008 50TH ST SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD 100945: PEPSI -COLA COMPANY 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 4075.5510 315.02 VANVALKENBURG 5630:5510 192023 04620817 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS, SOLD WINE 45.75- 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX 192024 13046768 1,583.54 192142 43977729 - 284.96 192143 48196056 271.62 192225 44032654 52.26= 192226 13046848 880.97 192309 48196058 3,238.10 312620 8/14/2008 100946 PERA 7,896.57 VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENTS 192310 47968 7,896.57 312621 8/14/2008 122992 PESEK, NICOLE 90.00 OFFICER LICENSE 192144 080408 90.00 312822 8/14/2008 117.087 PETERSON COMPANIES 1,200.67 SPRINKLER REPAIR 192311 9533 329.11 SPRINKLER REPAIR 192312 9598 17529.78 312623 8114/2008 100274 PGI COMPANIES INC 867.98 DRIVER INSPECTION FORMS 00001974 192145 11289 867.98 312625 8/14/2008 100743 PHILLIPS WINE.& SPIRITS 1,782.08 191952 2638770 31.12 191953 2639222 1,152.92 191954 2638771 3,279.90 191955 2638768 1,045.35 191956 2639574 52.24- 191957 2638769 8/13/2008 8:36:26 Page - 23 Subledger Account Description Business Unit COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 5430.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 4075.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD VANVALKENBURG 5630:5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD CENTENNIAL LAKES 1190.6030 PENSIONS ASSESSING 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS -POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 05455.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -455 SOUTH VIEW TO VALLEY V 05455.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS WM -455 SOUTH VIEW TO VALLEY V 1553.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING, 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS, SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING . R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY . ANA 81 J8 8:36:26 312626 8/1412008 Council Check Register Page - 24 8/14/2008 8/14/2008 1178643 7411.6103 Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 193.65 192470 2638234 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 199.08 192471 2639654 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 184.08 192472 2639476 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 308.53 192473 2641785 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 83.36 192474 2641787 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 161.12 192475 2639607 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 926.82 192476 2641781 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING 21.12 192477 2641782 5842.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX YORK SELLING 1,190.94 192478 2641779 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,492.11 192479 2641780 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,217.60 192480 2641777 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 307.65 192481 2641778 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,074.09 192482 2641786 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 49.12 192483 2641784 5862.5515 COST OF GOODS SOLD MIX VERNON SELLING 4.13- 192484 3390882 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPLIES TIRES & TUBES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT ED ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS CHEMICALS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL PSTF FIRE TOWER 14,748.75 312626 8/1412008 100958 PLUNKETT'S PEST CONTROL 44.36 PEST CONTROL 192313 1178643 7411.6103 44.36 312627 8/14/2008 120988 PLYMOUTH FRAMERY 155.00 COMMENDATION FRAME 192227 685806 1400.6406 155.00 312628 8/14/2008 119620 POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC. 419.35 TIRES 00001753 192228 142480 1553.6583 419.35 312629 8/14/2008 100819 POPP.COM 412.00 PHONE SERVICE AGREEMENT 00002016 192229 91409 5610.6230 412.00 312630 8/14/2008 119429 POVOLNY SPECIALTIES 1,970.25 LIGHTING CABINET 00001903 192025 30679 1322.6530 1,970.25 312631 8/14/2008 116396 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 842.30 AIR -METH 2.5% 192314 30341254 7413.6545 842.30 312632 8114/2008 100968 PRIOR WINE COMPANY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PSTF OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPLIES TIRES & TUBES POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT ED ADMINISTRATION REPAIR PARTS CHEMICALS STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL PSTF FIRE TOWER R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/13/2008 8:36:26 ~ Council Check Register Page - 25 1 8114/2008 - 41412008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 194.10 191958 92856 5842.5513 COST-OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 121.19 191959 91050 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 97.05 192485 92853 5862.5513; COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 845.40 192486 94432 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 452.30 192487 94441 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING . 129.10 192488 94437 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 1,839.14 312633 8/14/2008 113732 -. PROFESSIONAL TOOL SALES 105.88 DRILL BITS 00001938 192315 80661 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 105.88 312634 8/14/2008 100969 PROGRESSIVE CONSULTING ENGINEE - 4,676.75 WELL HOUSE #20 PROJECT 192316 07037.09 05480.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION WM-480 NEW WELL #20 PHASE 2 4,676.75 312635 8/14/2008 106322 PROSOURCE SUPPLY 779.82 LINERS; TISSUE, ROLL TOWEL 00002012 192026 4259 5630.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES CENTENNIAL LAKES 779.82 . 312636 8/14/2008 122988 PUBLIC SURPLUS 11932.00 STREET SWEEPER 192027 229180 1305.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT .EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT 1,932.00 312637 8114/2008 100971 QUALITY WINE 2,191.11 192489 044113 -00 5822.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR 50TH ST SELLING 2,492.80 192490 043658 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 471.60 192491 042220 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 546.10 192492 042062 -00 5862.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 7,134.17 192493 044112 -00 5862:5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR VERNON SELLING 1,032.70 192494 043948 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1.61 192495 043656 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 89.60 192496 044157 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 4,209.60 192497 043740 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 686.42 192498 042145 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING - 684.81 192499 044574 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 7,009.76' 192500 044111 -00 5842.5512 COST OF GOODS SOLD LIQUOR YORK SELLING - 6,905.63 192501 043655 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 1,312.60 192502 043947.00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING - 68.00 192503 042711 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE - YORK SELLING 8.00- 192504 039705 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 34,828.45' R55CKREG _JG20000 1,001.10 RAMP STAIRWELL CLEANING CITY MINA 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 1,001.10 Council Check Register 312641 8/1412008 8114/2008 8/14/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 00006302 192231 312638 8/14/2008 REPAIR PARTS 122995 QUEEN OF CAKES INC. 173.17 TIRES 00006308 192232 CD1128720 200.00 FIRE TRUCK CAKE 192230 413377 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 200.00 312642 8114/2008 312639 8/14/2008 101965 OWEST 5,896.25 86.62 952 926 -0419 192371 0419 -8/08 1646.6188 TELEPHONE 51.79 952 926 -0092 192372 0092 -8/08 5913.6188 TELEPHONE CIVILIAN DEFENSE 36.33 651 281 -1355 B001311 192373 1355 -8/08 1400.6188 TELEPHONE 285.80 612 E24 -8661 192374 8661 -8/08 5111.6188 TELEPHONE 508.84 612 E24 -8657 192375 8657 -8/08 5420.6188 TELEPHONE 7410.6575 PRINTING 285.80 612 E24 -8656 192376 8656 -8/08 1628.6188 TELEPHONE 748.42 612 E01 -0426 192377 0426 -8108 1550.6188 TELEPHONE 508.31 612 E01 -8392 192378 8392 -8/08 1550.6188 TELEPHONE SOFTENER SALT 00003648 192233 508.31 612 E01 -8391 192379 8391 -8/08 1550.6188 TELEPHONE 45.97 3,020.22 312645 312640 8114/2008 121106 ROCHON CORPORATION 117692 R & B CLEANING INC. L J8 8:36:26 Page - 26 Business Unit FIRE DEPT. GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE DISTRIBUTION POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ART CENTER BLDG /MAINT CLUB HOUSE SENIOR CITIZENS CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 1,001.10 RAMP STAIRWELL CLEANING 00001976 192146 379 1375.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PARKING RAMP 1,001.10 312641 8/1412008 100466 R & R PRODUCTS INC. 854.10 ROLLERS 00006302 192231 CD1126702 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 173.17 TIRES 00006308 192232 CD1128720 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 1,027.27 312642 8114/2008 105324 READY WATT ELECTRIC 5,896.25 UPGRADE WARNING SIREN 00003128 192317 93794 1460.6230 SERVICE CONTRACTS EQUIPMENT CIVILIAN DEFENSE 18,223.09 REPLACE TORNADO SIRENS 00003144 192318 93793 1460.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CIVILIAN DEFENSE 24,119.34 312643 8114/2008 114489 RICOH AMERICAS CORPORATION 184.59 COPIER USAGE 192319 403096013 7410.6575 PRINTING PSTF ADMINISTRATION 184.59 312644 8/14/2008 100980 ROBERT B. HILL CO. 45.97 SOFTENER SALT 00003648 192233 00210006 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 45.97 312645 8/1412008 121106 ROCHON CORPORATION 432,626.25 PAYMENT #15 REVISED 192384 073108 45008.6710 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FIRE STATION #1 RENOVATION 432,626.25 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/13/2008 8:36:26 Council Check Register Page - 27 8/14/2008 8/14/2008 - Check # Date Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No ' Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 312646 8114/2008. .101979- ROFIDAL, KEVIN, 72.31 K9 TRIALS EXPENSES 192147 080408 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL 72.31 312647 8114/2008 100988 SAFETY KLEEN . . 107.94` PARTS WASHER SERVICE 00001973 192148 MB02408542 1553.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 107.94 312648 8/14/2008 101634 SAINT AGNES BAKING COMPANY 55.68 BAKERY 192149 223385 5421.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD GRILL 55.68 - 312649 8114/2008 101232 SALUD AMERICA INC. 222.00 192505 EMLS080108 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 222.00 312650' 811412008 119774 SAMS, WADE - 573.00 IRRIGATION REPAIR 192234 522751 5610.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ED ADMINISTRATION 573.00 312651 8/14/2008 104788 SANDY'S PROMOTIONAL STUFF 2,238.31 RE- USABLE GROCERY BAG PROMO 192320 SH8078 1122.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMM 2238.31 312652 .8114/2008 105442 SCHERER BROS. LUMBER CO. 6.79 LUMBER 00001689 192028 40662047 5921.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES LIFT STATION MAINT 6.79 312653 811412008 104151 SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP. 150.00 ELEVATOR BOX & DATA PLATE 192321 7100148487 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 150.00 312654 8/14/2008 101577 SCHMOLL, RUTH 354.28 MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT 192235 080608 1470.6107 MILEAGE OR ALLOWANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 354.28 312655 8/14/2008 100991 SCHWAB - VOLLHABER - LUBRATT 315.54 TRANSDUCER 00001841 192029 INV042901 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL „ 601.08 TRANSDUCERS 00001922 192150 INV043039 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 916.62 R55CKRE6 - JG20000 CITY ANA Council Check Register 8/14/2008 8/14/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 312656 8114/2008 103970 SEEGER, MICHAEL 99.62 K9 TRIALS EXPENSES 192151 080408 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 99.62 312657 8/14/2008 103249 SHANNON, JIM 130.00 PERFORMANCE 8/19/08 192353 081108 5610.6136 PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER 130.00 312658 811412008 100998 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 372.67 PAINT 00008042 192030 1777 -5 5511.6532 PAINT 346.13 PAINT 00008048 192031 2264 -3 5511.6532 PAINT 100.73 PAINT 00008091 192032 4068 -6 5511.6532 PAINT 153.01 SPRAY TIPS 00001883 192033 4272 -4 1301.6556 TOOLS 972.54 312659 8114/2008 119909 SHERWIN WILLIAMS CO. 214.48 PAINT 00002381 192034 8877 -8 5630.6532 PAINT 214.48 312660 8/14/2008 101383 SIITARI, MICHAEL 606.63 FBINAA CONFERENCE EXPENSE 192322 080708 1400.6104 CONFERENCES & SCHOOLS 606.63 312661 8/14/2008 106415 SKYHAWKS SPORTS ACADEMY 3,564.00 SPORTS PROGRAMS 192152 324821318 1600.4390.22 MINI HAWKS 3,564.00 312662 8/14/2008 122998 SLATE CEMENT INC. 927.00 CONCRETE REPLACEMENT 192323 21250 01343.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 522.00 CONCRETE REPLACEMENT 192324 21251 01343.1705.30 CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 1,449.00 312663 8/14/2008 108553 SOUTHTOWN PLUMBING INC. 228.50 REBUILD OUTSIDE SPIGOT 192153 080408 5311.6180 CONTRACTED REPAIRS 228.50 312664 8/1412008 105193 SPAIN, MARK 88.32 UNIFORM PURCHASE 192380 081108 1646.6201 LAUNDRY 88.32 312665 8/1412008 122996 SPECTRA ASSOCIATES INC. 336.00 MINUTE BOOKS 192236 28157 -F 1120.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES L J8 8:36:26 Page - 28 Business Unit POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ED ADMINISTRATION ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS GENERAL MAINTENANCE CENTENNIAL LAKES Ilil6[y��]�M�Hq�I�:L1� PARK ADMIN. GENERAL BA -343 RICHMOND HILLS 2ND ADD BA -343 RICHMOND HILLS 2ND ADD POOL OPERATION BUILDING MAINTENANCE ADMINISTRATION R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/14/2008 -- 8/14/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSURANCE INSURANCE ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 8/1312008 8:36:26 Page - 29 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION CONTINGENCIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION AMMUNITION CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT UNIFORM ALLOWANCE ADVERTISING OTHER CHEMICALS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ANIMAL CONTROL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GOLF ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING 336.00 312666 8/14/2008 101004 SPS COMPANIES 24.31 BUSHING 00001873 192035 S1885887.001 5913.6406 24.31 312667 8/14/2008 101016 SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC 869.58 70TH ST CORRIDOR STUDY 192325 5863 -19 1500.6103 869.58 312668 8114/2008 120534 STANTON'GROUP 106,727.00 PREMIUM 192326 105430 1550.6200 84,240.00 PREMIUM 192327 105490 1550.6200 190, 967.00 312669 8114/2008 101007 STAR TRIBUNE 4,068.46 WANT ADS 192328 073108 1550.6121 4,068.46 312670 8/1412008 123011 STEINBERG, JANET 75.00 PERFORMANCE 8/18/08 192352 081108 5610.6136 75.00 312671 8114/2008 101015 STREICHERS 2,292.47 .40SW TACTICAL 192036 1538205 1400.6551 83.07 REPAIR LIGHTBAR 00001952 192237 1539728 1553.6180 207.68 SQUAD EQUIP INSTALLATION 192238 1539727 1400.6215 4,186.86': SQUAD EQUIP INSTALLATION 192239 1539721 1400.6710 4,736.85 SQUAD EQUIP'INSTALLATION 192240 1539719 1450.6710 49.99 COLD GEAR 00003148 192241 1539921 1400.6203 11,556.92 312672 8/14/2008 100900 SUN NEWSPAPERS. 350.00 BRAEMAR GOLF AD 00006077 192154 1103996 5410.6122 350.00 312673 8/14/2008 121492 SUPERIOR TURF SERVICES INC. 2,389.00 INSECTICIDE 00006300 192242 4561 5422.6545 2,389.00 312674, 8/1412008 120998 SURLY BREWING CO. 401.00 192506 JM5148 5822.5514 GENERAL SUPPLIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INSURANCE INSURANCE ADVERTISING PERSONNEL 8/1312008 8:36:26 Page - 29 Business Unit DISTRIBUTION CONTINGENCIES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SVC - OTHER ED ADMINISTRATION AMMUNITION CONTRACTED REPAIRS EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT UNIFORM ALLOWANCE ADVERTISING OTHER CHEMICALS POLICE DEPT. GENERAL EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN POLICE DEPT. GENERAL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL ANIMAL CONTROL POLICE DEPT. GENERAL GOLF ADMINISTRATION MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER 50TH ST SELLING R55CKREG - JG20000 CITY MINA I J8 8:36:26 Council Check Register Page- 30 8/14/2008 8/14/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description Business Unit 401.00 312675 8/14/2008 122047 SWANSON, CATHY 135.00 ADAPTIVE REC PROGRAM 192381 080808 1629.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 135.00 312676 8/1412008 120595 T- MOBILE 51.62 477067848 192329 072708 1260.6188 TELEPHONE ENGINEERING GENERAL 51.62 312677 8/14/2008 122949 TANK TRUCK EQUIPMENT 380.32 HOSES, FITTINGS 00001954 192037 INV004285 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 312.77- RESTOCKING CHARGE 00001954 192038 RTN00300 1301.6556 TOOLS GENERAL MAINTENANCE 67.55 312678 8/1412008 101326 TERMINAL SUPPLY CO 78.23 BULBS 00001721 192243 12970 -00 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 78.23 312679 8/1412008 101035 THORPE DISTRIBUTING COMPANY 381.00 192155 504323 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 370.00 192244 68621 5421.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER GRILL 4,849.80 192507 504333 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 267.50 192508 503804 5862.5514 COST OF GOODS SOLD BEER VERNON SELLING 5,868.30 312680 8114/2008 117042 THREE RIVERS PARK DISTRICT 95.00 CANOEING FEES 192245 4330391 1629.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ADAPTIVE RECREATION 95.00 312681 8/14/2008 101826 THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR CORP. 58.09 ELEVATOR SERVICE 192246 938041 1470.6215 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 58.09 312682 8114/2008 101474 TITLEIST 3,145.95 GOLF BALLS 192156 2749140 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 176.34 GOLF BALLS 192157 2753845 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 2,596.55 GOLF BALLS 192158 2896502 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 255.48 CAPS 192159 2794436 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES 612.36 IRONS 192247 2913035 5440.5511 COST OF GOODS - PRO SHOP PRO SHOP RETAIL SALES t 6,786.68 8/13/2008 8:36:26 Page - 31 Business Unit WM-479 M'SIDE H2OMAIN EXC /PREP LS38 LS REHAB @ FRANCE AVE LS38 LS REHAB @ FRANCE AVE LS37 LS REHAB 9 WALNUT DRIVE LS37 LS REHAB @WALNUT DRIVE BR -3 Browndale Avenue Bridge .FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 312685 8/14/2008 101038 TOLL GAS 8 WELDING SUPPLY R55CKREG LOG20000 46.35 CITY OF EDINA 462669 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN Council Check Register 46.35 8/14/2008 8/14/2008 8/14/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 312683 8/1412008 227.89 102,742 TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLAN 183695 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 2,719.93 WATERMAIN LINING 192330 000200802757 05479.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 84.00 LIFT STATION #22 MODIFICATIONS 192331 000200802745 10038.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES 1,B84.B1 LIFT STATION #21'8 022. 192332 000200802746 10038.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION 22995 1,884.82 LIFT STATION #21 8 #22 192332 000200802746 10037.1705.21 CONSULTING INSPECTION MONTHLY FTP FILE 192160 83.99 .LIFT STATION #21 MODIFICATIONS 192333 000200802744 10037.1705.31 MATERIALS /SUPPLIES 14.20 2,603.571 BRIDGE REPAIR 192334 000200802736 10091.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN 9,261:12 312684 8/14/2008 8/14/2008 101293 TODD, DARRELL 116535. TRAVELERS 10:99 REIMBURSEMENT 192250 080608 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES i 92.13 REIMBURSEMENT 192250 080608 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 59.96 WATER, ICE FOR US OPEN 192382 080808 1470.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES 163.08 220.83 8/13/2008 8:36:26 Page - 31 Business Unit WM-479 M'SIDE H2OMAIN EXC /PREP LS38 LS REHAB @ FRANCE AVE LS38 LS REHAB @ FRANCE AVE LS37 LS REHAB 9 WALNUT DRIVE LS37 LS REHAB @WALNUT DRIVE BR -3 Browndale Avenue Bridge .FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 312685 8/14/2008 101038 TOLL GAS 8 WELDING SUPPLY 46.35 WELDING GAS 00001999 192335 462669 1553.6580 WELDING SUPPLIES EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 46.35 31268.6 8/14/2008 122990 TOTAL ENERGY SYSTEMS LLC 227.89 FILTERS .00001916 192039 183695 1553.6530 REPAIR PARTS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN 227.89 312687 8/14/2008 101693 TOTAL REGISTER SYSTEMS 14.20 MONTHLY FTP FILE 192160 22995 5820.6160 DATA PROCESSING 50TH STREET GENERAL 14.20 MONTHLY FTP FILE 192160 22995 5840.6160 DATA PROCESSING LIQUOR YORK GENERAL 14.20 MONTHLY FTP. FILE 192160 22995 5860.6160 DATA PROCESSING VERNON LIQUOR GENERAL 42.60 312688 8/14/2008 116535. TRAVELERS 479.74 DEDUCTIBLE_ 192336 000295716 1550.6200 INSURANCE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL 479.74 312689 8/14/2008 116302 TRI - ANIM HEALTH SERVICES INC 220.83 EMS SUPPLY ROOM.- , 00003614 192248 MMH82060164 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 6.660.32 EMS SUPPLY ROOM - 00003615 192249 MMH82118951 1470.6510 FIRST AID SUPPLIES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL 6,881.15 312690 8/1412008 100682 TRUGREEN LAWNCARE - 53.45 WEED CONTROL 192040 080408 1470.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FIRE DEPT. GENERAL _ 53.45 WEED CONTROL 192040 080408 1552.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CENT SVC PW BUILDING 105.00 WEED CONTROL 192040 080408 1643.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES GENERAL TURF CARE R55CKRE. jG20000 CITN )INA Council Check Register 8/14/2008 -- 8/14/2008 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanatlon PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description 856.26 WEED CONTROL 192040 080408 1643.6546 WEED SPRAY REPAIR PARTS J8 8:36:26 Page - 32 Business Unit GENERAL TURF CARE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES BANK SERVICES CHARGES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS PSTF OCCUPANCY CONTRACTED REPAIRS PSTF OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL 1,068.16 312691 8/14/2008 101172 TWIN CITY SAW CO. 17.26 SCREWS, SPACERS, NUTS 00001709 192161 A15286 1553.6530 17.26 312692 8114/2008 115379 U.S. BANK 50.00 MEETING EXPENSES 192390 080408 1120.6106 16.90 NET ZERO 192391 AUG42008 1500.6103 78.20 PAYPAL INTERNET 192391 AUG42008 1550.6155 145.10 312693 8/1412008 101049 UHL COMPANY 447.00 AUTOMATION ASSISTANCE 192337 36443 7411.6180 572.00 AUTOMATION ASSISTANCE 192338 36441 7411.6180 1,019.00 312694 8114/2008 103308 UNITED STATES PLASTIC CORP. 65.84 BOTTLES 00001893 192041 2124427 5913.6406 65.84 312695 8/14/2008 101055 UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA 90.00 PLANT DISEASE CLINIC 192251 8 -306 5422.6103 90.00 312696 8/14/2008 103298 UPS STORE #1715, THE 6.95 MAILING SERVICE 00001978 192252 TRAN 6238 1322.6406 17.56 MAILING SERVICE 00004123 192253 TRAN 6101 1260.6406 24.51 312697 8114/2008 114236 USA BLUE BOOK 170.01 GATE VALVES 00001910 192042 639637 5913.6406 170.01 312698 8/1412008 100410 USA MOBILITY WIRELESS INC. 12.10 PAGER 192254 R6096083H 1550.6188 12.10 312699 8/14/2008 101058 VAN PAPER CO. 852.70 TISSUE, LINERS 192162 090028 -00 5421.6406 852.70 REPAIR PARTS J8 8:36:26 Page - 32 Business Unit GENERAL TURF CARE EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN MEETING EXPENSE ADMINISTRATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTINGENCIES BANK SERVICES CHARGES CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL CONTRACTED REPAIRS PSTF OCCUPANCY CONTRACTED REPAIRS PSTF OCCUPANCY GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES STREET LIGHTING ORNAMENTAL GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES DISTRIBUTION TELEPHONE CENTRAL SERVICES GENERAL GENERAL SUPPLIES GRILL R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA Council Check Register 8/14/2008 -- 8/14/2008 Check # Dale Amount Supplier/ Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No 312700 8/14/2008 102734 VEIT & COMPANY INC 300.00 TELEVISING 192339 080065 -1 04346.170: 425.00 .TELEVISING 192339 080065 -1 04348.170: 542.50 TELEVISING 192339 080065 -1 04349.170; 1 26750 Subledger Account Description CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS CONTRACTOR PAYMENTS 8/13/2008 8:36:26 Page - 33 Business Unit STS -346 WOODLAND LN &WOODEND DR STS -348 WOODLAND RD STS -349 WOODEND DRIVE 312701 8114/2008 106308 -- VEITH, MICHELLE 95.37 NATURE CAMP SUPPLIES 192163 804 1600.4390.04 NATURE CAMP PARK ADMIN. GENERAL 95.37 312702 . 8/14/2008 101063 VERSATILE VEHICLES INC. 1,906.13 ENGINE 192255 38072 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 2,116.87 ENGINE 00006299 192256 37845 5424.6530 REPAIR PARTS - RANGE 5.41 BOLT 00006293 192257 37820 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 11.32 MUFFLER 192258 37816 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 301.37 CLUTCH, SWITCH KIT 00006297 192259 37840 5422.6530 REPAIR PARTS MAINT OF COURSE & GROUNDS 4,341.10 312703 8/14/2008 102004 VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COM 345.00 ANNUAL FIRE INSPECTION ' 00008099 192043 127946 5511.6180 ' CONTRACTED REPAIRS ARENA BLDG /GROUNDS 345.00 312704 8/14/2008 101067. VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER 50.00 SAFETY VESTS 00001935 192340 229012 1260.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES ENGINEERING GENERAL 107.49 SAFETY VESTS 00001935 192340 229012 1301.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT GENERAL MAINTENANCE 107.49 SAFETY VESTS 00001935 192340 229012 5913.6610 SAFETY EQUIPMENT DISTRIBUTION 264.98 312705 8/14/2008 120627 VISTAR CORPORATION 118.15 CLEANING PRODUCT` 192044 23645663 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 576.74 CONCESSION PRODUCT 192044 23645663 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 59.30 CLEANING PRODUCT 192045 23654851 5311.6511 CLEANING SUPPLIES POOL OPERATION 439.07 - CONCESSION PRODUCT 192045 23654851 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 242.35 CONCESSION PRODUCT 192164 23673609 5320.5510 COST OF GOODS SOLD POOL CONCESSIONS 1;435:61 312706 8/14/2008 101069 VOSS LIGHTING ' 188.25 QUAD LIGHTING KIT 00001924 192046 15108368 -00 1551.6406 GENERAL SUPPLIES CITY HALL GENERAL 188.25 312707 8/1412008 ..102542 .WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS INC R55CKREG -jG20000 239834 5842.5513 CITY MA 191962 239987 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 192512 Council Check Register 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 192513 239937 5862.5513 8/14/2008 8/14/2008 192514 Check # Date Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Subledger Account Description YORK SELLING 192516 925.00 PARKING DEMAND PROJECT 192341 21349200004 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 925.00 312708 8/1412008 103466 WASTE MANAGEMENT - SAVAGE MN 4,422.35 REFUSE 192047 4655035 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,621.46 REFUSE 192048 4656167 4095.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 9,043.81 312709 8/14/2008 101076 WEST PHOTO 30.07 BACKDROP RENTAL 192342 29382 1513.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 30.07 312710 8/1412008 101078 WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT 239.63 GAS KEYS 00001919 192165 0037623 -IN 1553.6585 ACCESSORIES 239.63 312711 8114/2008 103196 WHEELER HARDWARE CO 1,372.50 WINDOW REPLACEMENT 00008059 192049 057767 5500.1740 MACHINERY $ EQUIPMENT 1,372.50 312712 8114/2008 101033 WINE COMPANY, THE 560.35 191960 198404 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 884.20 192509 198789 -00 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 1,687.00 192510 198686 -00 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 672.05 192511 198788 -00 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 312713 8/14/2008 101312 WINE MERCHANTS 1,209.01 466.48 1,766.28 2,108.60 614.29 713.99 7 ine en 312714 8/14/2008 101086 WORLD CLASS WINES INC 889.65 965.75 545.75 b. j8 6:36:26 Page - 34 Business Unit -ENGINEERING GENERAL 50TH STREET RUBBISH 50TH STREET RUBBISH EMPLOYEE PROGRAMS EQUIPMENT OPERATION GEN ICE ARENA BALANCE SHEET YORK SELLING 50TH ST SELLING YORK SELLING VERNON SELLING 191961 239834 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 191962 239987 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 192512 240768 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 192513 239937 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 192514 240766 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 192515 240767 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 192516 239936 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING 192517 240101 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 192518 215199 5822.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE 50TH ST SELLING 192519 215198 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 192520 215123 5842.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE YORK SELLING f 7 R55CKREG LOG20000 CITY OF EDINA 8/13/2008 8:36:26 Council Check Register Page - 35 8/14/2008 -- 8/14/2008 Check # Data Amount Supplier / Explanation PO # Doc No Inv No Account No Suhledger Account Description Business Unit 2,401.15 312715 8114/2008 105740 WSB & ASSOCIATES INC. 2,500.00 MS4 PERMIT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 192343 01686 - 120 -7/25 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 1,157.50 MILL & OVERLAY 192344 01686- 110 -7/25 01348.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -348 PARKLAWN- FRANCE TO YORK 1,157.50 MILL & OVERLAY 192344 01686- 110 -7/25 01349.1705.20 CONSULTING DESIGN BA -349 76TH ST- FRANCE TO YORK 3,565.00 SE TRAFFIC MODEL 192345. 11 -7124 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 1,041.00 70TH ST FINAL DESIGN 192346 17 -7125 01336.1705.24 CONSULTING CONSTR MGMT BA336 W70TH - FRANCE TO YORK 2,179.00 TRANSPORTATION PLAN UPDATE 192347 14 -7/24 1260.6103- PROFESSIONAL SERVICES. ENGINEERING GENERAL 1,638.00 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING REVIEW 192348 13 -7/24 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 2,500.00 MS4 PERMIT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM 192349 1 -7/08 1260.6103 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENGINEERING GENERAL 15,738.00 312716 811412008 101726 RCEL ENERGY 4,866.69 51- 6621207 -1 192050 '162515051 5913.6185 LIGHT & POWER DISTRIBUTION 27.35 51- 7567037 -0 192051 162531067 1321.6185 LIGHT & POWER STREET LIGHTING REGULAR 29.79 51- 4151897 -6 192052 162473875 1646.6185 LIGHT & POWER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,359.29 51- 6979948 -4 192053 162373081 5821.6185 LIGHT & POWER 50TH ST OCCUPANCY 1,898.68 51- 6979948 -4 192053 162373081 5861.6185 LIGHT & POWER VERNON OCCUPANCY 1,950.45 51- 6979948 -4 192053 162373081 5841.6185 LIGHT & POWER YORK OCCUPANCY -1,133.21 5175847121 -5 192054 162505913 5914.6185 LIGHT & POWER TANKS TOWERS & RESERVOIR 804.04 51- 6137136 -8 192055 162509114 5430.6185 LIGHT & POWER RICHARDS GOLF COURSE 1,812.28 51- 6840050 -6 192383 163387179 5911.6185 LIGHT & POWER _ PUMP & LIFT. STATION OPER 13, 881.78 312717 811412008 120099 Z WINES USA LLC 585.00 192521 1804 5862.5513 COST OF GOODS SOLD WINE VERNON SELLING 1,915,778.07 Grand Total Payment Instrument Totals Check Total 1,915,778.07 :, Total Payments 1,915,778.07 R55CKSW 20000 CITY INA I 98 8:38:17 Council ChecK Summary Payu - 1 Company Amount 01000 GENERAL FUND 398,837.32 04000 WORKING CAPITAL FUND 635,730.43 04800 CONSTRUCTION FUND 2,913.27 05100 ART CENTER FUND 326.07 05300 AQUATIC CENTER FUND 2,713.80 05400 GOLF COURSE FUND 51,516.54 05500 ICE ARENA FUND 33,069.66 05600 EDINBOROUGH /CENT LAKES FUND 15,095.33 05800 LIQUOR FUND 291,933.32 05900 UTILITY FUND 434,670.56 05930 STORM SEWER FUND 10,748.18 05950 RECYCLING FUND 35,380.00 07400 PSTF AGENCY FUND 2,843.59 Report Totals 1,915,778.07 8/1412008 - 8/14/2008 We confirm to the best of our imWedge and belief, that these claims comply in all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing polic nd procedures da �`'� CITY OF EDINA CITY COUNCIL CREDIT CARD PAYMENT REGISTER 6/26/08 - 7/25/08 Card Holder Aerchani Account Name Trans Date Amount Purchase Discription Merchant Name - Merchant City State Code JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/06/24. $40.00 REC PROGRAM SUPPLIES JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/06/25 $500.00 INFLATABLE AMENITY PARTIAL JOHN KEPRIOS . 2008/06/26 $173.00 TEAM, TENNIS TOURNAMENT JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/06/26 $50.47. REC PROGRAM SUPPLIES JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/06/26 $500.00 INFLATABLE AMENITY PARTIAL JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/06/30 $390.00 CONFERENCE JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/06/30 $30.54 REC PROGRAM SUPPLIES JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/07/01 $125.67 ROOM DEPOSIT JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/07/01 . $125.67" ROOM DEPOSIT JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/07/02 $10.41 " UPS JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/07/02 $256.52 CAMERA JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/07/02 $26.71 POWER CABLE JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/07/07 $7 .00 TENNIS REGISTRATION JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/07/08 $49.18 REC PROGRAM SUPPLIES JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/07/08 $30.83 REC PROGRAM SUPPLIES JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/07/08 $59.41 REC PROGRAM SUPPLIES JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/07/08 $21.81 , REC. PROGRAM SUPPLIES JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/07/09 $21.37 EQUIPMENT RENTAL JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/07/11 $16.21 'PARK ADMIN SUPPLIES - JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/07/14 $21.38. REC PROGRAM SUPPLIES JOHN KEPRIOS 2.008/07/14- $34.40 REC PROGRAM SUPPLIES JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/07/16 $216,00 TEAM TENNIS JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/07/17 $23.39 PHOTOFINISHING JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/07/17 $29.92 ADAPTIVE REC SUPPLIES JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/07/18 $500.00 INFLATABLE AMENITY REPAIR JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/07/21 $500.00 INFLATABLE AMENITY REPAIR JOHN KEPRIOS, _ 2008/07/22 $50.00 INFLATABLE AMENITY REPAIR JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/07/23 $71:86 SOCKS JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/07/23 $113.80 SOCKS JOHN KEPRIOS 2008/07/24 - $135.56 BARBEQUE DEB MANGEN 2008107/21 118.96 MEETING EXPENSE Page 1 MICHAELS #3739 BLOOMINGTON MN 1624.6406 CUTTING EDGE CREA00 OF 651- 2098600 MN 5620.6530 ACTIVE *USTA TEAMTNS 877- 243 -8107 CA 1623.6406 TARGET 00002600 ST. LOUIS PAR MN 1624.6406 CUTTING EDGE CREA00 OF 651< 2098600 - i MN 5620.6530 NATIONAL RECREATION -AN "703- 8580784 VA 1600.6104 TRIARCO ARTS & CR01 OF ( 800 - 3283360 MN 1624.6406 CRAGUNS LODGE AND GOL BRAINERD MN 1600.6104 CRAGUNS LODGE AND GOL BRAINERD MN 1600.6104 THE UPS STORE #1715 EDINA MN 5410.6235 MICRO CENTER #045 RETAI ST LOUIS PARK MN 5410.6610 MICRO CENTER #045 RETAI ST LOUIS PARK MN 5410.6610 ACTIVE *USTA TEAMT-NS 877- 243 -8107 CA 1623.6406 DICK'S CLOTHING &SPORTII' RICHFIELD MN 1624.6406 CUB FOODS #1559 ST. LOUIS PA MN 1624.6406 TARGET 00021899 ST LOUIS PARK MN 1624.6406 BIG LOTS #017900017913 SAINT LOUIS MN 1624.6406 PITNEY BOWES RENTAL 800 - 228 -1071 CT 5610.6235 LAKESHORE LEARNING #23 ST LOUIS PARK MN. "NS 1600.6406 WALGREENS #4260 HOPKI MN 1624.6406 TARGET 00021899 ST LOUIS, PARK MN 1624.6406 UNITED STATES TENNIS 914- 696 -7000 NY 1623.6406 WALGREENS #2509 EDINA MN 1624.6406 TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1629.6406 CUTTING EDGE CREA00 OF 651- 2098600 MN 5620.6530 CUTTING EDGE CREA00 OF 651- 2098600 MN 5620.6530 CUTTING EDGE CREA00 OF 651- 2098600 Y.N. 5620.6530 TGT *TARGET.COM TARGET.COM MN 5620.5510 TGT *TARGET.COM TARGET.COM MN 5620,5510 CUB FOODS #3128 EDINA MN 1624.6406 TARGET 00013524 CHASKA MN 1100.6106 DEB MANGEN 2008/07/22 $7.08 MEETING EXPENSE MIKE SIITARI 2008/06/29 $168.51 COMPUTER SUPPLIES MIKE SIITARI 2008/07/01 $112.50 NATIONAL NIGHT OUT PENS MIKE SIITARI 2008/07/01 $72.67 INK CARTRIDGES MIKE SIITARI 2008/07/07 $192.41 CAMERA MIKE SIITARI 2008/07/07 $74.82 VCR /CD PLAYER MIKE SIITARI 2008/07/09 $37.24 DISPATCH SUPPLIES MIKE SIITARI 2008/07/10 $49,07 MEETING MIKE SIITARI 2008/07/16 $302.91 NATIONAL NIGHT OUT CLIPS MIKE SIITARI 2008/07/18 $415.00 CONFERENCE MIKE SIITARI 2008/07/22 $23.51 EXTERNAL FLOPPY DRIVE MIKE SIITARI 2008/07/23 $173.81 CABLE CONNECTORS JOHN WALLIN 2008/06/26 $200.75 AQUATIC CENTER EQUIPMT JOHN WALLIN 2008/07/15 $141.29 COMP PLAN MEAL JOHN WALLIN 2008/07/16 $70.00 HUMAN RELATNS WORKSHOP JOHN WALLIN 2008/07/22 $108.04 HUMAN RELATNS WORKSHOP $6,299.68 Page 2 JERRY'S FOODS EDINA MN 1100.6106 LENOVO 2CVT1X 800 - 426 -9735 DE 1400.6160 MYSHOPANGEL.COM 518- 371 -5774 NY 1400.6406 BEST BUY 00000059 EDINA MN 1400.6406 NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHAI EDINA MN 1400.6406 TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1400.6406 TARGET 00023135 EDINA MN 1400.6406 CHEESECAKE EDINA EDINA MN 1400.6106 ONLINE PROMOS 650- 2872455 CA 1400.6406 APCO INTERNATIONAL 386- 322 -2500 FL 1400.6104 MICRO CENTER #045 RETAI ST LOUIS PARV MN 1400.6160 CABLES TO GO 800- 287 -2843 OH 1400.6160 JEFF ELLIS & ASSOCIATES, 800 - 742 -8720 TX 5310.6406 PANERA BREAD #1307 SAINT LOUIS P MN 1400.6103 NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE 651- 2279291 MN 1504.6218 PANERA BREAD #1307 SAINT LOUIS P MN 1504.6218 We c onfim to the best Of otlPl nwdedge and belief, that these Claims comply In all material respects with the requirements of the City of Edina purchasing poll orocedures dam eT l e o V Manager :1 01 REPORT/RECOMMENDATION To: Mayor & City Council Agenda Item VII. From: Debra Mangen Consent ❑ City Clerk Information Only Date: August 19, 2008 Mgr. Recommends ❑ To HRA ® To Council Subject: Correspondence Received Since Last Council Meeting Action ❑ Motion ❑ Resolution ❑ Ordinance ❑ Discussion Info /Background: Attached are copies of a -mails and letters received since the last Council meeting. .Primary Credit Analysts: Jane Hudson Ridley Chicago (1) 312- 233 -7012 iane_ridley@ idardandpoors.com ,condary Credit Analysts: Linda Merus Chicago (1) 312- 233 -7017 linda merus@ sta ndardandpoors.com Caroline West Chicago 3127233 -7047 caroline west@ standardandpoors.com RECEIVED Edina, Minnesota AUG 15 2008 Profile Credit US$21.74 mil GO util rev bnds & GO perm imp revolving fund bnds ser 200BA &B dtd 08/28/2008 due 02/01/2020 Long Tenn Rating AAA/Stable New Edina Long Term Rating AAA/Stable Affirmed Edina Hsg & Redev Auth, Minnesota Edina, Minnesota Edina Hsg & Redev Auth (Edina) Long Tenn Rating AA+ /Stable Affirmed Edina Hsg & Redev Auth (Edina) pub proj rev bnds ser 2005A Long Tenn Rating AA+ /Stable Affirmed Rationale The `AAA' standard long -term rating on Edina, Minn.'s series 2008A and 2008B general obligation (GO) utility revenue and permanent improvement revolving fund bonds reflects the city's: • Participation in the Minneapolis economic base and role as a first -ring suburb in the prosperous Minneapolis -St. Paul (Twin Cities) western suburbs; • Above - average financial performance with very strong fund balance levels, both on a dollar and a percent of expenditures basis; ■ Evidence of ongoing strong management practices; and ■ RatingsDirect Manageable debt burden with a very rapid amortization schedule that is primarily Publication Date supported by tax increment financing (TIF) or other revenue sources. 1. 31, 2008 The city's GO pledge secures both series of bonds, with series 2008A being paid from net revenues of the utility system and series 2008 paid for through special assessments levied IM Edina, Minnesota against benefiting properties. The city is using bond proceeds to make utility and road/street improvements. Edina continues to be one of the Twin Cities' premiere, high - wealth suburbs; innovative redevelopment has helped the city maintain that coveted status. While the city's population has stayed fairly steady over the past 30 years —the current population is at 47,450 residents by the state demographer's estimate —the tax base has continued to grow. Per capita effective buying income figures have hovered around 200% of state and national levels, reflecting Edina's high wealth levels. Despite recent economic softness in many areas of the country, Edina's local. economy remains very strong. In 2008, growth in assessed value was 5 %, bringing the total tax base to $120 million. Total market value in the city is $11.1 billion; this equates to an extremely strong $235,000 per capita. Despite lower growth rates in 2008, assessed value and market value have average annual growth rates of more than 10 % for the past five years. New growth in the city has slowed a bit, but building starts for 2008 are on target to be only slightly lower than 2007; however, 2007 starts declined markedly from 2006's. Despite this trend in lower starts, taxable value grovath has continued, demonstrating some local immunity to national trends. Edina has historically maintained an excellent financial position, supported by diverse revenue sources and conservative management practices. At fiscal year -end Dec. 31, 2007, the city had $14.1 million, or a very strong 51 % of operating expenditures, in the general fund, almost all of which was unreserved. This was an increase of $272,000 over the previous fiscal year -end. After funding all required operations and reserves, it is the city's policy to transfer any excess balance in the general fund to the capital improvement fund; in 2007, the transfer was $700,000. In addition to its general operating dunes, Edina runs the city's three package liquor stores, accounting for them as an enterprise fund, which had unrestricted net assts of $1.6 million at fiscal year -end 2007; the transfer from the liquor fund to the general fund was $721,200. Year -to -date performance indicates break -even or better financial performance in the general fund. The city's fiscal 2008 budget was balanced without a draw on reserves. First -half property tax collections were only slightly below billings (less than $100,000), indicating that the city's property tax base remains solid; other revenue sources have come in better than anticipated. Levy increase limits imposed by the 2008 legislative session are not expected to result in any drastic change to the city's operations, but to compensate for any lost revenues in coming years, Edina does anticipate making changes to fleet and personnel management. Some changes to the city's policies have resulted in a revision of the Financial Management Assessment (FMA) to "strong" from "good ". An FMA of strong indicates that practices are strong, well embedded, and likely sustainable. Edina now reports budget -to- actual performance to the city council on a monthly basis and has also made enhancements to its long -term planning model. Other highlights of the FMA include a thorough process for revenue and expenditure assumptions; a comprehensive capital improvement plan that is regularly updated; and formal, well- considered debt and fund balance policies. Due to additional debt being issued by the overlapping entities, Edina's debt levels are moderate at $4,194 per capita but low as a percentage of market value at 1.8 %. While carrying charges are elevated at 21 %, direct debt amortization is very rapid, with 86% being retired over the next 10 years. In addition, of the city's net $49.9 million in direct debt, only $10.4 million is paid from GO levy Standard & Poor's I ANALYSIS Edina, Minnesota revenues, further reducing the high carrying- charge burden on Edina's taxpayers. The city may issue additional debt later in 2008 to acquire and make improvements to a public works facility. Outlook The stable outlook reflects Standard & Poor's Ratings Services' expectation of Edina's continued strong financial performance with good fund balances bolstered by ongoing development and. redevelopment in the city. Appropriate- management of the debt profile is also key to maintaining the rating. www.standardandpoors.com August 11, 2008 James Hovland, Mayor City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland: RECEIVED AUG 14 2008 I would like to urge you to support granting Dave & Buster's the permits necessary to b�lld_ r�V� 1 ?�.atinn in. the CnY of F_d_�na. As a biisiress. we are always looking i�Jr ne \�i� :ways to attract new consumers to our community, and believe that opening a new Dave & Buster's in the Cypress Development off of France Avenue could help serve that role. We believe Dave & Buster's delivers an integral component to attracting customers to our city. Dave & Buster's would give the families in Edina an excellent venue for food a-rid entertainment while bringing in patrons from surrounding cities thus delivering much needed revenue. Dave & Buster's also has a well documented positive track record for community. involvernerit which has been hilly demonstrated through their activities,� other locations. As an example, the Maple Grove High School, the Totino -Grace High School football tea iris ; and a large nuinber of other local youth athletic and other groups currently hold their awards banquets at the Dave & Buster's restaurant located in Maple Grove. Given their commitment to community involvement and the service they are positioned to deliver to Edina consumers, we wholeheartedly welcome Dave & Busters to our commtmity. :y "emardi" President. 5215 EDINA INDUSTRIAL BOULEVARD • SUITE 100 • EDINA, MN 55439 TELEPHONE (952) 831 -5002 • FAx (952) 893 -0165 July 31, 2008 James Hovland, Mayor City of Edina 4801 W 50th St Edina, MN 55424 Dear Mayor Hovland: .- Ssa1- AuG 0 4 IS RECEIVED OFC 952 949 8300 FAX 952 949 8390 TDD 952 949 8399 BOBO Mitchell Rd Eden Prairie, MN 55344-4485 On July 17 a construction worker became trapped in a utility trench cave -in at a home edenprairie.org construction site here in Eden Prairie. Public safety personnel from your city reported to the scene as part of the mutual aid rescue response. I am pleased to tell you that the rescue operation was a success. The worker is expected to make a full recovery. Our citizens were well served by the well planned and executed rescue effort on July 17. A man's life was saved because the public safety personnel from our respective cities were able to execute a successful multi- agency rescue operation. Your public safety personnel were integral to the success of this operation. On behalf of.the City of Eden Prairie, I want to thank you for supporting your public safety personnel and for supporting their efforts to participate in the mutual aid of your southwest suburban neighbors. Thank you. i�� ?LA� Phil Young Mayor /GITV� SEAL AUG I17 2008 RECEIVED. July 10,'2008 To the. emergency dispatcher, police and paramedics of.Edina: For all of you who were involved with my emergency care on Saturday morning,. May 10, 2008,. I want to extend a heart-felt thank you. From the moment when my wife called 911- to our arrival at Fairview Hospital, my life was entrusted in your -care. You all were so very important to my early diagnosis and eventual recovery from the stroke that I suffered that morning. Because of your rapid and professional response, I was able to receive the medical care that is so vital to stroke patients at that early stage. My family and I are so very - grateful for the care that we received from all of you. ► II n Thank you so very much. Regards, Larry W OM 6221 Creek Valley Rd. Edina, MN . 55439 �I L5 bexjse_ Vic( � Fb Kelp -m c�,iye"i Tedd Skain�d OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER I July 31, 2008 �� SEAL AUG 0 4 2008 RECEIVED Gordon Hughes, City Manager gY City of Edina 4801 West 50th Street Edina, MN 55424 Dear Gordon: On July 17 a construction worker became trapped in a utility trench cave -in at home. construction site here in Eden Prairie. Public safety personnel from your city reported to the scene as part of a mutual aid rescue response. I am pleased to tell you that the rescue operation was a success. The worker is expected to make a full recovery. You should know that a man's life was saved because the public safety personnel from our respective cities have developed enduring positive working relationships that are so vitally important when executing a successful multi- agency rescue operation. On behalf of the City of Eden Prairie, I want you to know that I am very appreciative of the not only the help that we received from your staff on July 17, but also for the good will and professional support that make successful outcomes like this one possible. Thank you. Sincerely, Scott H. Neal City Manager DFC 952 949 6300 FAX 952 949 6390 TDD 952 949 6399 8080 Mitchell Rd Eden Prairie, MN 55344 -4485 edenprairie.org RECEIVED AUG 1 11008 Susan Heiberg From: Lynette Biunno Sent:. Monday, August 11, 2008 10:40 AM Cc: Susan Heiberg Subject: FW: Control of Rental Properties and Section 8 Issues From: Anne Marie Plante [mailto:AnneMarie .Plante @mpls.kl2.mn.us] Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2008 2:39 PM To: Lynette Biunno Subject: Control of Rental Properties and Section 8 Issues To the Mayor and Members of the City Council: Page 1 of 1 With the high number of foreclosures and increasingly common, unregulated rental of single - family homes in Edina, it might be advisable for the Council to consider what appears to be an emerging national trend, namely problems related to Section 8 /afforable housing placements in suburbs. I highly recommend that everyone read the July 9 New York Times article about the rise in crime and other tensions that followed the migration of Section 8 clients to the suburbs in California, as well as the July /August Atlantic Monthly, which cites academic research about this pehnomenon. We do not have to leave our area, however, since Eden Prairie is already battling this issue. Edina would do well to be proactive. I am interested in your thoughts on the matter, since rentals and group homes contribute to the degradation of single - family, owner - occupied zones. Thank you, Anne Marie Plante 4801 West 70th Street 8/11/2008 Minutes of the Edina Park Board June 10, 2008 Edina City Hall, Council Chambers MEMBERS PRESENT: Joseph Hulbert, Rob Presthus, Randy Meyer, Howard Merriam, George Klus, Mike Damman, Dan Peterson, Jeff Sorem, Ray O'Connell, Todd Fronek, Carolyn Nelson STAFF PRESENT: John Keprios, Janet Canton, Ed MacHolda I. APPROVAL OF THE APRIL 8, 2008 PARK BOARD MINUTES George Klus MOVED TO APPROVE THE APRIL 8, 2008 PARK BOARD MINUTES. Dan Peterson SECONDED THE MOTION. MINUTES APPROVED. H. NEW BUSINESS A. Countryside Park Master Plan - Mr. Fronek stated that a thank you goes out to Mr. Hulbert, Mr. Merriam, Mr. O'Connell, Mr. Johnson and Mr. Sorem for attending the Countryside Park meeting. He noted that the board members were put into different groups for discussions with the residents. Mr. Sorem indicated that after talking to the residents in his group he felt there were four main items. First, they want the hockey rink back. Second, there is no need, for a walking path due to the fact that Bredesen Park is so close by. Third, they would like better signage for the parking lot that is shared by the church and lastly they really want to keep the tennis courts. Mr. Peterson noted he also was impressed with how passionate his group was for wanting to keep the tennis courts. He stated that he didn't feel there was a lot of interest in having a hockey rink. There was a reasonable amount of interest in having a small off -leash dog area. In addition, there was quite a bit of interest in trying to get parking off of Olinger and move it to the parking lot that the city already has. Mr. Merriam commented that he concurs with what has been said and was surprised at how many people want to see the tennis courts stay in the park. Mr. Hulbert noted that he was in the same group as Mr. Sorem and noted that the people really emphasized the desire to have the hockey rink back. He stated that his group liked the A and B concepts and looked at hybrids of both. He commented that a dog park was not quite as important in his group. Mr. O'Connell stated that he agrees with what has been said, they definitely want the hockey rink back. Mr. Keprios stated that he agrees with everything that has been said. He noted that the architects took notes that capture the sentiment of the people who expressed their opinions at the meeting (see attached). Mr. Keprios explained this is not something that's going to happen overnight. He pointed out that they will continue to provide a skating area in the winter and that everything will stay just as they are until they get a plan in place that they can all buy into and get a master plan adopted. He stressed that they are also going to need to figure out how they are going to finance it whether it be through the capital plan and develop it in phases or take a more aggressive approach and solicit donations and/or pursue a referendum. Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that he is going to give the architects some direction to get to the next level and create a final master plan. He noted that at the August or September Park Board meeting he will have a final concept plan that will be a reflection of what they have heard the community wants. Mr. Klus asked Mr. Keprios if once he comes up with a preliminary plan will there be another work session with the neighborhood. Mr. Keprios replied he thinks once the Park Board has a plan they want to propose to the neighborhood he thinks it would be appropriate to hold a public hearing and would ask the City Council if that's how they would like it to be handled so that they are not duplicating efforts. B. 2009 -2013 Capital Improvement Plan — Mr. Keprios went through the items he would like to see eliminated and the items he would like to see added to the 2009 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that they recently learned that it is possible to develop a new athletic field at Pamela Park. Mr. Keprios explained that what he would propose that the Park Board do is hold a public hearing for all of the proposed projects for Pamela Park for the next five years and let the neighborhood have their say. He explained that this way it will help the Park Board decide if they are really going to plan for a quarter of a million dollars to have lights at the three softball fields. In addition, neighborhood input should be sought via a Public Hearing on plans for a new $400,000 athletic field with lights, expansion of parking lots, playground equipment replacement and all other CIP projects proposed for Pamela Park. Mr. Fronek entertained a motion to approve the CIP as laid out on the proposed changes to the revised five year CIP. Mr. Klus replied that he would like to make that motion with the caveat that each time projects come up on the CIP that a public hearing is held with the neighbors prior to the project so that the neighborhood can give their feedback. George Klus MOVED TO APPROVE THE REVISED CIP WITH THE STIPULATION THAT THERE WOULD BE PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR EACH ITEM ON THE CIP BEFORE INITIATING THE PROJECTS. Mr. Klus commented that he thinks it has to be on each item because he thinks they learned a lesson from trying to put fencing at Pamela Park this time and the neighbors were very concerned. 2 Mr. Meyer asked what is the requirement in order for a public hearing to be held, what is generally the rule of thumb? Mr. Keprios replied there really is no written rule or standing policy; however, they try to use their best judgment and anticipate what they believe to be controversial. Mr. Keprios pointed out that he did not foresee the fencing at Pamela Park to become a controversial issue like it was. He stated that had he seen that coming, he definitely would have called for a public hearing. Mr. Keprios indicated that he doesn't know if there needs to be a public hearing for a batting cage or for the natural resources inventory or for the replacement windows at Arneson Acres. Mr. Keprios noted that if there's an item that's going to affect the neighborhood at all then they need to inform them. Mr. Klus responded that the batting cages are part of the whole Pamela Park public hearing process. He commented that on some of the smaller items there may be some people in the community who might want to give some input on what's looked at and stated that he thinks it's important to at least open that up to a public hearing to let those people give their input. Ray O'Connell SECONDED THE MOTION. Mr. O'Connell stated that he would like to CALL THE QUESTION. Mr. Damman stated that he doesn't agree that the Park Board mandate that. He indicated that the staff is intelligent enough to know when it's needed. Mr. Klus replied that he is not questioning the intelligence of the staff but rather is trying to take a more proactive stance by letting the community know that we do want them to be part of the process. Mr. Merriam commented that he thinks this really deserves an entire agenda item discussion because they need to look at the whole idea of what requires a public hearing and what doesn't. Mr. Merriam stated that he thinks it needs to be a staff decision until they can come up with some kind of a tripping mechanism definition. Mr. Meyer noted that he thinks they need to do some research to understand what are other communities doing and what are their standards, so that they can compare. He commented that he would like to give staff the opportunity to do a little bit of their due diligence so that we are creating a policy that they can live by and the Park Board can support. Mr. Meyer suggested that they separate the motion to table or add to a future meeting a discussion about when public hearings are held on behalf of the Park Board and for now just look at the CIP. Mr. Presthus commented that he tends to side with trusting the staff because realistically, if they start holding a public hearing for every last little change nothing is going to get accomplished. He noted that he is for public hearings on the bigger issues. He stated that he tends to side with the last two comments that further information needs to be gathered on what's best for the city as far as being efficient and moving forward. Mr. Hulbert noted that he thinks Mr. Meyer stated it perfectly. He added that there is a reason why the city has a staff to make some of these discretionary calls as to what matters do need to have a public hearing. He noted that if they decide to do it they are going to need some sort of a tripping mechanism which might be too much to handle here. Mr. Fronek stated that he tends to agree with Mr. Hulbert. Mr. O'Connell WITHDREW HIS SECOND. MOTION DIED FOR A LACK OF A SECOND. Mr. Fronek entertained a new motion TO APPROVE THE REVISED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN. Howard Merriam MOVED TO APPROVE. Dan Peterson SECONDED THE MOTION. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. Mr. Fronek asked Mr. Keprios if he could provide some direction on how to handle public hearings in the future. Mr. Keprios asked the Park Board if they would entertain a motion or at least give a consensus to give staff the green light to call for a public hearing for all of the Pamela Park improvements this year. The Park Board unanimously agreed by consensus. C. Mission Statement — Mr. Keprios indicated that it would be helpful to know if the majority of the Park Board members agree with the new proposed language at least in concept. Mr. Keprios explained that it has long been his view that parks and recreation serves a much greater purpose that better defines the value of the department's mission. Mr. Keprios stated that since he has sent this out he has heard some really good feedback from Park Board members and staff that they don't like the language "to sustain and improve the uncommonly high quality of life enjoyed by residents and businesses ....." Mr. Keprios explained that the comment that he is hearing is that it would be more appropriate to just eliminate "uncommonly high" and go with "quality of life ". Mr. Keprios indicated that what's in the staff report is something that he would recommend making an amendment to take out the terminology "uncommonly high" and just say "improves the quality of life ". Mr. Sorem suggested that he would like to see the word "uncommonly" removed but leave in "high ". George Klus CALLED THE QUESTION. Mr. Fronek stated that they have a motion on the floor to remove the word "uncommonly" from the proposed mission statement. Mr. O'Connell indicated that he thinks "quality of life" can stand by itself and that "uncommonly high" is just awkward language. Mr. Fronek stated the motion on the floor to APPROVE THE MISSION STATEMENT AS IT READS REMOVING THE WORD "UNCOMMONLY" MOTION CARRIED. Ray O'Connell ABSTAINED. III. OLD BUSINESS A. Park Board Assignments — Mr. Keprios asked if everyone was comfortable with their park assignments to which it was noted yes. Mr. Fronek requested that each Park Board member know what is going on at their parks. B. Board and Commission Liaison Reports — Ray O'Connell — Mr. O'Connell gave an up -to -date report to the Park Board on the Community Education Services Board and the Energy and Environment Commission. IV. PUBLIC COMMENT A. Pamela Park Fence — Mr. Keprios informed the Park Board that he has heard from a few neighbors who are not very happy with the black vinyl fence that was recently put in at Pamela Park. He commented that he didn't think there would be any controversy since he had not heard from anyone when they last put in fencing at Pamela Park on field #1. Mr. Keprios stated that it has been a learning lesson and that in the future this is something where he would definitely send out a notice to the neighborhood. Bruce Johnson, 4601 West 56`h Street, informed the Park Board that he is the President of the Edina Girls Fast Pitch Association. He stated that he would like to applaud Park and Recreation and the City Council for doing what he thinks is the right thing not only for girl's fast pitch, but for the community and Park and Recreation as a whole. Mr. Johnson handed out pictures and stated that he doesn't think from an aesthetic perspective that it dramatically affects the aesthetics of the park. Mike Davis, 6512 Warren Avenue, informed the Park Board that he is a board member on the Edina Girls Fast Pitch Association and that he understands that the fences have changed the park a little bit and that they are permanent. He commented that he also understands that the residents of the park get a little possessive of the park and that possibly some of the activities that they normally would do there have changed. However, he feels the overall benefits to the community outweigh the small sacrifices that may have been made at the park. Mr. Klus stated that he knows that each of the athletic associations in the city are willing to work with the neighbors on any issue and even though the opponents did not attend tonight's meeting he would encourage the Girls Fast Pitch Association to try to work out any issues to see if there are things they can do to make the park what they hope it can be. 5 Mr. Davis suggested that when notices are sent out for neighborhood meetings he thinks the users of the parks should be informed as well. He stated that these are community parks and everyone should have input whether they are neighbors or users of the park. V. UPDATES FROM STAFF A. Hope Kids — Mr. Keprios complimented the Park Board on approving the Hope Kids special event at Edinborough Park. He noted that they had over 350 in attendance. VI. PARK BOARD COMMENTS A. Power Point Presentation for the Public - Mr. Meyer made a suggestion that earlier when they went through the Capital Improvement Plan they had a nice colored outline to look at, however, the public could not see it. Therefore, it would be great, if in the future if they could show a power point presentation or something like that so that people can see what we are looking at and discussing and give clarity as far as what is going on. Mr. Meyer commented that the Capital Improvement Plan really gives a nice snapshot of where the park system is going in the next few years and the spaces they plan to renovate or upgrade. B. Public Hearings - Mr. Meyer pointed out that he thinks in the next couple of months they need to have a discussion on when to hold public hearings. He stated that he thinks staff needs to be clear on what the expectations are of the board. Mr. Meyer indicated that it may also make sense to incorporate the City Council at some point in those discussions and sort of frame that city wide on what we think of public hearings and when they are necessary. He stated that he does think they need to incorporate the public more in the process but at the same time they need to frame that so everyone is clear on what and when they are doing that. C. Artificial Turf Versus Real Grass - Mr. Peterson asked Mr. Keprios if sometime he could do a cost difference between artificial turf and real grass as well as is there an environmental reason why synthetic would be better than grass. Mr. Keprios replied he would be happy to provide that report. D. Thank You to Randy Meyer — Mr. Merriam wanted to publicly thank Randy Meyer for all of his hard work. He is a member of multiple boards and commissions and is a good role model for us. MEETING ADJOURNED. T F Edina Countryside Park Concept Plan Review Neighborhood Meeting Summary - May 29, 7008 The City of Edina, MN held a neighborhood meeting at City Hall to gather input on potential park improvement ideas for Countryside Park. Parks and Recreation Director John Keprios described the planning process to date, noting that several ideas were considered for improving the parks. The Parks Commission reviewed those ideas and provided direction toward two concept plan alternatives. A neighborhood survey was sent out and 78 people responding indicating their preferences for park improvements. Two park concept plans were prepared but these are not the only options. Neighborhood input was desired on these plans plus other ideas. Input from the survey and tonight's meeting will help define the scope of park improvement plan. John mentioned the tel of hockey from the park some years ago and the deteriorating condition of the Park warming house. John stated that no money has been allocated to do the improvements and that the final improvement plan will form a base to define the cost of improvements. Greg Ingraham and Anna Claussen, park planners and Landscape Architects from Hoisington Koegler Group have been working with City staff and the Parks Commission to prepare park plans. Greg reviewed the existing parks conditions noting that the park has a mix of good facilities such as the little league field and the tennis courts, and some lesser quality . facilities such as the park shelter building, the parking lot and the prep field. The need to replace the old shelter building prompted the planning effort. Parking is shared with Colonial Church. The parking lot is located on the west edge of the park and is isolated from the park activities. The park lacks loop walking trails and accessible paths to the park facilities. Anna reviewed the two park improvement concept plans, noting the differences between the plans. Both plans attempt to get the parks activities closer to the parking lot and locate the new park shelter near the center of the park. New proposed uses include a turf plan field for soccer and lacrosse, new children's play equipment, an off -leash dog play area for small dogs, gardens, and paths. The attendees split into two groups to review the park improvement ideas. The following is a summary of the comments from the two groups: Lack of winter uses in the parks. Desire to have an ice skating rink, a hockey rink and a warming building with restrooms. - Dog park is not a good idea. Have signs to make people aware of the hidden parking location. No new separate parking lot is need. Improve the existing one. - Have one small turf field instead of two. Open up the woods to increase visibility of the park and parking. - Keep the tennis courts. - Moving the active park uses closer to the parking is a good idea. - Like the idea of increased accessibility to the park elements with paths. - Move the children's play equipment closer to the parking lot. - Create a children's play area that is more connected with nature and the existing natural amenities of the park (the wooded edge). The proximity of the prep field and little field allows activities for younger and older children at the same location at the same time. 'A MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE EDINA HERITAGE PRESERVATION BOARD TUESDAY, JUNE 10, 2008, AT 7:00 P.M. EDINA CITY HALL — COMMUNITY ROOM 4801 WEST 50'" STREET MEMBERS PRESENT: Laura Benson, Vice Chairman, Karen Ferrara, Lou Blemaster, Connie Fukuda, Arlene Forrest MEMBERS ABSENT: Chris Rofidal, Bob Kojetin, and Jean Rehkamp Larson STAFF PRESENT: Joyce Repya, Associate Planner OTHERS PRESENT: Robert Vogel, Heritage Preservation Consultant Jim & Kathy Haymaker, 4633 Drexel Avenue Tom Meyer, Meyer, Scherer & Rockcastle, Ltd. Michael Stickley, Meyer, Scherer & Rockcastle, Ltd. Cheryl Dulas, 4609 Bruce Avenue Kitty O'Dea, 4610 Bruce Avenue I. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: May 13, 2008 Following a brief discussion, Member Forrest moved approval of the minutes from the May 13, 2008 meeting. Member Blemaster seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. II. COUNTRY CLUB DISTRICT: A. Certificate of Appropriateness H-08 -7 4633 Drexel Avenue — New Detached Garage Planner Repya explained that the subject property is located on the northeast corner of Drexel Avenue and Country Club Road. The existing home was constructed in 1931 and currently has a 2 -stall attached garage accessed by a driveway on the southerly side of the property off Country Club Road. The subject request involves building a new, 500 square foot detached garage in the rear yard, and converting the existing 2 -stall attached garage into living space. The plan illustrates the new structure will maintain a 5 foot setback from the rear (east) lot line, a 20 foot setback from the side street property line on Country Club road and a 24 foot setback from the northerly side lot line. A new curb cut will be required since the proposed garage is set back closer to the rear lot line. Minutes — June 10, 2008 Edina Heritage Preservation Board The new 2 -stall detached garage is proposed to measure 25'x 20'. The design of the structure is shown to compliment the architectural style of the home with stucco clad walls, natural stone and wood trim, consistent with the Tudor architectural style. Attention to detail with windows and doors is demonstrated on the north, south, and west elevations. The east fagade was intentionally void of windows since it borders a privacy fence — however, natural stone along the base, and wood brackets at the eave line are provided. Slate or asphalt shingles are proposed for the hip roof. The height of the proposed garage is shown to be 19' 7" at the highest peak. The new height requirement set out in the revised Plan of Treatment was considered in the design of the garage, which meets the maximum height allowed when the heights of the adjacent detached garages were taken into consideration. The height at the mid -point of the gable is shown to be 14' 5 ", and a height of 8' 8" is provided at the eave line. The ridge line is shown to be 7' 5.75" in length due to the hip roof. The maximum lot coverage allowed for the property is 30 %. Construction of the proposed 500 sq. ft. garage will create a total lot coverage of 28% - within the limits allowed by city code. Planner Repya explained that Preservation Consultant Vogel reviewed the plans and opined that the proposed detached garage meets the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation as they are applied to new construction, and is consistent with the guidelines for detached garages in the district Plan of Treatment. The plans depict a garage that is compatible in scale, materials, and architectural character with the historic house. Mr. Vogel observed that the proposed garage would not detract from the character of the historic homes in the neighborhood, nor alter the mood of the streetscape. While the addition, which will replace the existing attached garage on the home is not subject to the Certificate of Appropriateness application, the plans were provided for the Board to review. Consultant Vogel opined that the addition appears appropriate in scale, building materials and texture with the body of the house. The new work does not appear to require the destruction of any distinctive architectural features that give the property its essential character and value as a heritage preservation resource. The proposed skylights on the roofs of the original house and the addition will not detract from the architectural features that give the property its essential character and value as a heritage preservation resource. The skylight on the historic roof should be relatively unobtrusive from the public viewshed and could be removed without destroying architectural features important to the historic integrity of the house. The addition is readily distinguishable from the historic structure, as well as architecturally compatible with the new garage, which together form a unified architectural ensemble when viewed from either side. Mr. Vogel recommends adding a year 2 Minutes — June 10, 2008 Edina Heritage Preservation Board built plaque or other form of exterior signage to differentiate the more contemporary addition from the historic house. Planner Repya recommended approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness request supported by the following findings: • The plans provided with subject request clearly illustrate the scale and scope of the project. • The information provided supporting the subject Certificate of Appropriateness meets the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and the Country Club District Plan of Treatment. Ms. Repya also suggested that the approval be subject to the following conditions: • The plans presented. • A curb cut application for new driveway, with removal of existing driveway and curb cut. • The condition that a year built (2008) plaque or sign is placed on the new detached garage as well as the addition to the home. BOARD MEMBER COMMENTS: Member Forrest questioned the height of the proposed garage. It was verified that the 19' 7" height demonstrated on the plan met the provisions of the revised Plan of Treatment. Board members shared comments regarding the excellent design of the garage; appreciating that consideration of the view from neighboring properties is obvious on all elevations. Consultant Vogel explained that he included comments regarding the addition because it is expected that the Minnesota Legislature will soon enact a preservation tax act which may be retroactive. If that is the case, because the addition is included in the review, it may qualify for tax relief through the possible upcoming legislation. Member Forrest observed that there is a young elm tree in the location where the new driveway is proposed, and expressed her concern regarding the potential loss of a boulevard tree. HOMEOWNER COMMENTS: Homeowner, Jim Haymaker explained that he is planning to transplant the young elm tree that will be displaced due to the new driveway. He added that if the tree did not survive he would be willing to replace it. 3 Minutes — June 10, 2008 Edina Heritage Preservation Board MOTION & VOTE: Member Blemaster moved approval of the Certificate of Appropriateness request subject to the conditions recommended by staff and the additional condition that if the boulevard tree displaced by the new driveway does not survive being transplanted, that it be replaced. Member Ferrara seconded the motion. All voted aye. The motion carried. B. Landmark Designation Brochure Planner Repya explained that at the May HPB meeting the Board discussed creating a new brochure for the historic Country Club District. Ms. Repya discussed a new brochure with the City's Communications Director, Jennifer Bennerotte who pointed out that the use of brochures has become passe in this day and age — the wide - spread use of the internet is the primary cause. Ms. Bennerotte observed that people most frequently turn to a web site to gain information. Another drawback for using a brochure is the cost. The Planning Department budget is very limited when it comes to printing costs. At this time, the funds are not available to pay for a new brochure. Ms. Repya provided the Board with a copy of the Country Club District page from the Heritage Preservation section of the City's web site. She pointed out that the web page contains more historic information than the previous brochure. She added that Ms. Bennerotte suggests the web page be printed and used to provide public information regarding the significance of the Country Club District heritage landmark designation. Board members observed that the web page does a good job of explaining the history of the District, however is missing important information regarding the landmark designation, plan of treatment and requirements for a certificate of appropriateness. Planner Repya agreed that the site needed to be updated to reflect the most current status and regulations for the District. No formal action was taken. III. EDINA HERITAGE LANDMARK LOGO: Planner Repya explained that she had asked Communications Director, Jennifer Bennerotte to come up with some choices for a logo that could be used to identify Edina Heritage Landmark properties. Four choices were provided to the Board. Discussion ensued regarding the merits of each design. 4 Minutes — June 10, 2008 Edina Heritage Preservation Board A majority of the Board favored a design that closely resembled the Edina Theater marquee — The top of the logo having "Edina" shown vertically; and underneath, "Heritage Landmark" is shown horizontally. Discussion ensued regarding how the logo would be used. Planner Repya explained that the logo could be used in the press when a property which has been designated an Edina Heritage Landmark is in the news. Also, the logo could be made available to the owners of designated properties. The Board agreed that would be a nice addition to the heritage landmark program. No formal action was taken. IV. PUBLIC EDUCATION OPPORTUNITIES: Consultant Vogel provided the Board with a list of heritage preservation resources which he recommended for a future preservation library. The list included books, pamphlets and periodicals to be used for reference purposes. Mr. Vogel also suggested that the Edina Library be approached about considering including these references for public use. Discussion ensued regarding where the funds would come from to purchase the resources for city hall. It was suggested that possibly the Edina Foundation could assist in purchasing the books. Member Forrest commented that she knew somebody that worked at the library and would be happy to approach them regarding providing the suggested references books. The Board thanked Mr. Vogel for the comprehensive list of resources - stressing that such an inventory would be very beneficial toward achieving the goal of public education on heritage preservation topics. No formal action was taken. V. ELIGIBLE HERITAGE PRESERVATION LANDMARK PROPERTIES: Consultant Vogel reviewed a list of the nine landmark designated properties and 10 recommended properties with the Board. Discussion ensued regarding prioritizing the 10 properties proposed for designation. Board members agreed that the 8 bungalow homes on the north side of West 44th Street, east of Grimes Avenue should take priority in light of recent changes which have occurred to several of the homes. Mr. Vogel observed that the bungalow district is more complicated, and would entail research prior to approaching the property owners. Responding to a question regarding procedure, Planner Repya explained that once Mr. Vogel has completed his research, to include a sidewalk survey, the property owners would be invited to a meeting with the HPB to discuss the heritage landmark 5 Minutes — June 10, 2008 Edina Heritage Preservation Board designation process and responsibilities. If after that meeting, a majority of the owners agree, the Board could then proceed to recommend landmark designation of the bungalow district to the City Council. The Board agreed to have Mr. Vogel begin the bungalow district research. Discussion continued regarding prioritizing the potential landmark properties. It was agreed that St. Stephen's Episcopal Church, 4439 W. 50th Street, and the original Oddfellow's Hall (Durr Building) at 4388 France Avenue should be moved to the top of the list. No formal action was taken. VI. OTHER BUSINESS: None VII. CONCERN OF RESIDENTS: Kitty O'Dea — 4610 Bruce Avenue Ms. O'Dea approached the Board with the following comments and questions: 1. Ms. O'Dea asked if the "Concern of Residents" portion of the meeting could be moved to the first part of the meeting's agenda? The City Council has moved public comment to the beginning of their meetings and that appears to have worked well. The Board agreed that would be a very good idea. 2. Ms. O'Dea has written an article on the history of one of the Country Club District's homes for the monthly neighborhood magazine. She has plans to write more articles and asked if the Board would agree to include information regarding the plan of treatment process. Board members expressed a desire to read Ms. O'Dea's articles and agreed that information regarding the plan of treatment process would be beneficial. Planner Repya stated that she receives a copy of the District's magazine and agreed to provide the Board with copies of the history articles. 3. Ms. O'Dea observed that at the last meeting when the Board was considering several Certificate of Appropriateness application, plans were approved that deviated from some portions of the new Plan of Treatment. She opined that the Board should stick to the Plan of Treatment and not set a precedence for exceptions. Member Forrest stated that Ms. O'Dea made a good point — adding that it is important for the public to understand the expectations; when exceptions to the Plan of Treatment are made, the Board clearly explain the rationale. D Minutes — June 10, 2008 Edina Heritage Preservation Board Board members thanked Ms. O'Dea for her comments, noting that feedback from the public is always appreciated. VIII. CORRESPONDENCE: None IX. NEXT MEETING DATE: July 8, 2008 — to be cancelled if no COA's due to Braemar Inspection Tour scheduled for the same evening. X. ADJOURNMENT 8:55 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Joyce R.epya 7 Prepared by: Brian T. Grogan, Esq. , MOSS & BARNETT A Professional Association 4800 Wells Fargo Center 9.0 South Seventh 'Street Minneapolis, MN 55402- _4129 Phone: (612) `347 -0340 Fax: (612).339 -6686 Email: grogarib @moss- barneit.com Web si ite: www .municipalcommunicationslaw.com 1167410v1 1 SOUTHWEST SUBURBAN CABLE COMMISSION ( "SWSCC ") 2007 ANNUAL REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 2007 SWSCC Members ................. ............................... 1 . ............................... 2007 SWSCC -Meetings .................................................. ..............................2 SWSCC Income /Expenses ................... ......... .......................................... 3 EXHIBITA .....................:..................:........................ ..........................:::.. A -1 1167410v1 2007 SWSCC Members Chair: Kristi Halverson, Council'Member, City of Hopkins Vice Chair: Robert. Ellingson, Council Member, City of Minnetonka Secretary/Treasurer: *Jim Genellie, Assistant City Manager of Hopkins Directors: *Scott Neal, City Manager, City of Eden Prairie: *Steve Devich, City Manager, City of Richfield Fred Wroge, Council Member, City of Richfield *Gordon Hughes, City Manager, City of Edina Scot Housh, Council Member, City of Edina *Patty Latham, IT Director, City of Minnetonka Commission Staff: Brian T. Grogan, Administrator /Attorney 'Designates member of Managers' Committee V. 2007 SWSCC Meetings As 'indicated below.; the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission met-twice during the year 2007. Attached hereto as Exhibit A are the Minutes from both meetings. 1. Full Commission meeting - Wednesday, April 25, 2007; and 2. Full Commission, meeting - .Wednesday, October, 24, 2007. The Managers' Committee did not hold separate. meetings - during 2007. 116741Ov1 2 SWSCC Income /Expenses 2008 Annual Operating Budget The 2008 budget was approved by the Commission at the October 24, 2007 meeting. Description 2008 Budget NOTES Legal and Administrative Costs $26,000.00 Accounting Annual Audit -0- Seminar Expenses MACTA Conference $ 1,050.00 NATOA Conference $ 2,600.00 Insurance League of MN Cities $ 2,060.00 Includes an estimated 3% increase Memberships MACTA $ 5,000.00 NATOA $ 425.00 Contingency $ 5,000.00 TOTAL $42,135.00 1167410v1 2. 2007 Franchise Fee Payments 2007 2 2006 2 2007 -06 2 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 14% Edina $ Member City 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quarter Total $ 41,013.91 $ $ 4,774.50 1 Eden Prairie $ 157,106.07 $ 166,270.20 $ 169,072.49 $ 170,158.74 $ 662,607.50 Richfield $ $74,287.94 $ Edina $ 134,422.38 $ 143,249.70 $ 146,318.67 $ 146,880.65 $ 570,871.40 $ 67,294.93 1 12% Hopkins $44,602.51 $ 45,764.81 $ 46,842.82 $ 45,943.49 $ 183,153.63 Minnetonka $ 143,843.25 $ 151,910.10 $ 153,958.75 $ 154,561.43 $ 604,273.53 Richfield $ 71,955.74 $ 75,150.27 $ 74,927.90 $ 75,117.83 $ 297,151.74 TOTAL $ 551,929.95 $ 582,345.08 $ 591,120.63 $ 592,662.14 r—$2,318,057.80 2007 Franchise Fee Income Richfield $297,i Minnetonka $504,273.53 Hopkins' $183,153.63 I Edina $570,871.40 i I Eden Prairie $662.807:50 i I -- - - -- - - - — - - -- -- /'- — $- $100,000.00 $200,000.00 $300,000.00 $400,000.00 $500,ODO.DO $600,000.00 $700,000.00 3. 2007 - 2006 Quarterly Average Income Member City Q 2007 2 2006 2 2007 -06 2 2007 Eden Prairie $ $165,651.88 $ $ 145,095.97 $ $ 20,555.91 1 14% Edina $ $142,717.85 $ $ 124,801.42 $ $ 17,916.43 1 14% Hopkins $ $45,788.41 $ $ 41,013.91 $ $ 4,774.50 1 12% Minnetonka $ $151,068.38 $ $ 131,780.22 $ $ 19,288.16 1 15% Richfield $ $74,287.94 $ $ 69,528.00 $ $ 4,759.94 7 7% TOTAL $ $ 579,514.45 $ $ 512,219.52 $ $ 67,294.93 1 12% Member City Q 2007 2 2006 2 2007 -06 2 2007 Eden Prairie $ $165,651.88 $ $ 145,095.97 $ $ 20,555.91 1 14% Edina $ $142,717.85 $ $ 124,801.42 $ $ 17,916.43 1 14% Hopkins $ $45,788.41 $ $ 41,013.91 $ $ 4,774.50 1 12% Minnetonka $ $151,068.38 $ $ 131,780.22 $ $ 19,288.16 1 15% Richfield $ $74,287.94 $ $ 69,528.00 $ $ 4,759.94 7 7% TOTAL $ $ 579,514.45 $ $ 512,219.52 $ $ 67,294.93 1 12% 4. 2006 Franchise Fee Payments Zoos Zoos Zoos zoos er Total Member City 1st Quarter 2nd Quarter 3rd Quarter 4th Quart Eden Prairie $138,048.00 $144,070.00 $144,008.00 $154,257.90 $580,383.90 Edina $120,409.00 $123,630.00 $123,576.00 $131,590.68 $499,205.68 Hopkins $39,645.00 $40,490.00 $40,472.00 $43,448.63 $164,055.63 Minnetonka $124,941.00 $131,470.00 $131,413.00 $139,296.91 $527,120.91 Richfield $66,966.00 $68,301.00 $68,270.00 $74,575.01 $278,112.01 TOTAL $490,009.00 $507,961.00 $507,739.00 $543,169.13 $ 2,048,878.13 2006 Franchise Fee Income Richfield Minnetonka Hopkins t '' °f v 'scar . Mai :as Edina Eden Prairie e 'sue $39 ?� ... :. 1167410v1 5 „ m r, , "r„ .,;.,. ixi I WNW er Total Eden Prairie $138,048.00 $144,070.00 $144,008.00 $154,257.90 $580,383.90 Edina $120,409.00 $123,630.00 $123,576.00 $131,590.68 $499,205.68 Hopkins $39,645.00 $40,490.00 $40,472.00 $43,448.63 $164,055.63 Minnetonka $124,941.00 $131,470.00 $131,413.00 $139,296.91 $527,120.91 Richfield $66,966.00 $68,301.00 $68,270.00 $74,575.01 $278,112.01 TOTAL $490,009.00 $507,961.00 $507,739.00 $543,169.13 $ 2,048,878.13 EXHIBIT A MINUTES Southwest Suburban Cable Commission Meeting Wednesday, April 25, 2007 At approximately 4:05 p.m. Mr. Jim Genellie, Secretary/Treasurer of the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission, called the meeting to order. Those present included Mr. Scott Neal of Eden Prairie, Mr. Jim Genellie and Ms. Kristi Halverson of Hopkins, Mr. Gordon Hughes of Edina and Ms. Patty Latham and Mr. Robert Ellingson of Minnetonka. Guests present were Mr. Lance Leupold and Ms. Michelle Cutler of Comcast. Staff present included Mr. Brian Grogan of Moss & Barnett. 1. CONSENT AGENDA Mr. Devich moved to accept the Consent Agenda and Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Mr. Genellie called for a vote on the motion and all those present voted in favor of adopting the consent agenda. 2. NEW BUSINESS A. Election of Officers — Mr. Grogan explained that the current officers of the Commission are Mr. Jim Genellie, Secretary/Treasurer, Mr. Bob Ellingson, Vice Chair and there is currently a vacancy for the position of Chair of the Commission. There was some discussion regarding the obligations of the Chair of the Commission and the fact that generally elected officials serve as both the Chair and Vice Chair. Motion was made by Mr. Neal, seconded by Mr. Hughes to nominate Ms. Halverson as Chair, Mr. Ellingson as Vice Chair and Mr. Genellie as Secretary/Treasurer. The motion passed. B. Annual Report — Mr. Grogan briefly described the annual report prepared by Commission staff to be reviewed and considered by the Commission and thereafter distributed to the member cities. Mr. Devich moved adoption of the Annual Report. Motion was seconded by Mr. Genellie. The motion passed. 3. SECRETARY /TREASURER'S REPORT Mr. Genellie distributed a Treasurer's Report dated April 13, 2007 showing payments made and cumulative balance of the Commission's account. Mr. Genellie also distributed a spreadsheet comparing the approved 2007 Budget with the 2007 Actual Budget to Date and indicated that the Commission had already spent nearly 64% of its total annual budget through the first three (3) months of the year. There was discussion regarding why the Commission's expenses were higher than normal during the first quarter period. Mr. Grogan explained that issues relating to Comcast customer service difficulties together with legislative issues brought on by the proposed Qwest overhaul of local franchising in the Minnesota State Legislature led to additional time not anticipated in the 2007 budget period. After discussion on the issue Mr. Devich made a motion to both accelerate the quarterly payments made by the member cities to the Commission and to increase the Commission Budget from $42,075 to $52,000. Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion passed. The Commission also discussed the appropriate procedure for the Secretary/Treasurer to retain Commission records. Mr. Grogan explained that Moss & Barnett regularly retains all Commission records in offsite storage, while most cities retain records for a six (6) year period and thereafter destroy or discard the records. The Commission directed staff to receive any records provided by Mr. Genellie and to thereafter store such records as is its normal practice. 4. ATTORNEY /ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 1167410v1 A -1 A. FCC Cable Franchising Order — Mr. Grogan spent approximately 15 minutes reviewing the FCC's Franchising Order explaining the new 90 day time limit which would apply to the member cities should Qwest submit an application for a cable franchise. Mr. Grogan also explained that it may in the cities' best interest to prepare a model template franchise and application information, so that the cities are prepared to process Qwest's request for a cable franchise in a timely manner under the FCC's new 90 day time frame. Mr. Grogan also reviewed the other key aspects of the FCC order including build out, impact on franchise fees, ramifications for local PEG programming and in kind services offered by Comcast. These in kind services include free cable service to schools and public buildings contained within the existing Comcast franchise. The Commission discussed the FCC's order and directed staff to prepare a model franchise and appropriate application information so that each member city will be prepared should Qwest submit a request for a competitive cable franchise. B. Franchise Related Costs and Annual Franchise Fees — Mr. Grogan briefly presented information regarding the actual expenditure by Comcast to support local public access programming at the Eden Prairie studio. This information may be relevant should a competing cable operator seek authority to provide service in one or more of the member cities. C. Minnesota Legislation Update — Mr. Grogan presented information from the League of Minnesota Cities and MACTA regarding pending legislation introduced by Qwest to streamline local franchising by taking authority away from local government and allowing the Public Utilities Commission to issue a franchise. The Commission discussed these issues and directed staff to continue to monitor the status of the state legislation and report back as necessary. S. MANAGERS' COMMITTEE REPORT The Managers' Committee has not met since the last Full Commission meeting. 6. COMPANY REPORT A. Comcast Customer Service — Mr. Grogan introduced the topic by explaining that the Commission and Comcast had exchanged correspondence regarding Comcast's compliance with the telephone answering statistics contained within the franchise and FCC regulations. Mr. Grogan emphasized that the current standard requires that Comcast answer subscriber telephone calls within 30 seconds as measured on a quarterly basis and that such standard is to be met 90% of the time. Comcast's written correspondence indicate that their quarterly measurements for the 4"' quarter of 2006 and the 1s` quarter of 2007 are below 75 %. Mr. Leupold was then introduced and proceeded to present a slide presentation explaining the steps which Comcast was undertaking to address its customer service issues including issues regarding its transition from Time Warner Cable to Comcast, impact of the Adelphia bankruptcy proceeding, staff attrition, dramatic changes occurring in the industry, and other related factors. Mr. Leupold indicated he would provide the Commission members with a summary of his slide presentation. Ms. Cutler was also introduced by Mr. Leupold to provide specific information regarding Comcast's call center operations and staff training to attempt to improve its responsiveness to subscriber inquiries. Commission members asked questions of Mr. Leupold and Ms. Cutler regarding these issues. Comcast revealed that it had hired 69 new customer service representatives and was adding an additional 166 customer service representatives in the 2nd quarter of 2007. After considerable discussion, a motion was made by Mr. Devich to issue a 1167410v 1 A -2 Notice of Violation to Comcast for failure to meet the telephone answering requirements contained within the franchise. The motion was seconded by Mr. Hughes. Motion passed. B. Miscellaneous — provided by Comcast — Comcast stated nothing additional to report. 7. NEXT MEETING DATE The next regular Full Commission meeting is Wednesday, October 24, 2007 at 4:00 p.m. at the Eden Prairie City Hall. 8. ADJOURNMENT At approximately 5:30 p.m. Mr. Genellie moved and Mr. Hughes seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting. Motion passed. 1167410v1 A -3 MINUTES . Southwest Suburban Cable Commission Meeting Wednesday, October 24, 2007 At approximately 4:10 p.m. Ms. Kristi Halverson, Chairwoman of the Southwest Suburban Cable Commission, called the meeting to order. Those present included Mr. Scott Neal of Eden Prairie, Mr. Jim Genellie of Hopkins, Mr. Gordon Hughes of Edina and Ms. Patty Latham and Mr. Robert Ellingson of Minnetonka. Guests present included Mr. Lance Leupold of Comcast. Staff present included Mr. Brian Grogan and Ms. Rachel Crary of Moss & Barnett. CONSENT AGENDA Mr. Hughes moved to accept the Consent Agenda and Mr. Genellie seconded the motion. Ms. Halverson called for a vote on the motion and all those present voted in favor of adopting the consent agenda. 2. OLD BUSINESS Customer Service Issue - At the April 25, 2007 Commission meeting, Comcast was held in non- compliance for customer service violations. Mr. Grogan reported that Comcast made considerable improvement in June, July and August of 2007. The Commission agreed not to pursue further enforcement action if Comcast brought their customer service into compliance and reimbursed the Commission for costs incurred to enforce the issue. The parties agreed upon a reimbursement settlement of $10,000. The settlement required approval of the Commission. 'Mr. Neal moved to rescind the Notice of Violation of the Franchise and to authorize the Commission to execute the letter reaching an agreement with Comcast and Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Ms. Halverson called for a vote and all those present voted in favor of adopting the agreement. Mr. Leupold provided payment to Mr. Genellie at this time. The check was made out to the City of Hopkins for tax ID purposes and the amount will go into the Commission's account. 3. NEW BUSINESS A. Competitive Franchising — Mr. Grogan reviewed an FCC order which allows video service providers to obtain a franchise as soon as 90 days and directs franchising authorities how to respond to franchise requests. Qwest is the most likely to request a franchise. The request can be placed either with a single city or with the entire Commission. The agenda packet included sample documents drafted by Mr. Grogan. These were provided as a starting point for the cities if they were to receive a request in order to relieve some of the pressure from the 90 -day shot clock. Mr. Grogan anticipated that the upcoming FCC order will extend the rights of the competitive providers to the incumbent provider, Comcast. Mr. Grogan fielded questions from Mr. Neal regarding whether the individual cities or the Commission will be the franchising authority and from Mr. Genellie regarding who pays the legal costs associate with a new franchise. Mr. Grogan responded that it is more likely that individual cities will receive requests rather than the Commission as a whole and often the franchisee will pay the costs but that will need to be negotiated in the franchise approval process. The Commission rules state that the franchises must be identical on a city by city basis. Mr. Neal commented that the cities should "hang together", so that any benefit negotiated will benefit all of the cities. B. 2008 Budget — Mr. Genellie stated that the Commission would have exceeded their 2007 budget but the $10,000 contribution made by Comcast for reconciling the customer service issues mitigated the overspending. Mr. Genellie also stated that the Commission has been using the contingency fund. Mr. Genellie also addressed the issue of whether the Commission should perform an annual audit of Commission financial records. Mr. Devich commented that he didn't believe an audit is necessary given the size of the Commission activities. Mr. Genellie agreed 1167410v l A -4 with Mr. Devich. Mr. Neal moved to adopt the 2008 budget without allocating funds for an audit and Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 4. SECRETARY/TREASURER'S REPORT Mr. Genellie reviewed the Claim's Report and Treasurer's Report. Mr. Devich moved to accept the Treasurer's Report and to waive the fourth quarter 2007 contribution by each of the member cities and Mr. Hughes seconded the motion. Motion passed. 5. ATTORNEY /ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT A. NATOA and MACTA Annual Conferences — Mr. Grogan attended both conferences. Agenda packet included summaries of sessions he attended. MACTA addressed state legislation. NATOA focused on municipal ownership and control of telecommunications infrastructure. 800 MHz rebanding was also discussed. Mr. Neal reviewed Eden Prairie's experience with rebanding. B. Minnesota Legislation Update — Mr. Grogan summarized the information included in the agenda packet. Further updates will be provided as soon as available. C. FCC Update — Mr. Grogan reviewed the information included in the agenda packet. The FCC was expected to release a second order related to competitive franchising. Further updates will be provided as soon as available. 6. MANAGERS' COMMITTEE REPORT The Managers' Committee has not met since the last Full Commission meeting. Mr. Hughes stated the customer service issue was handled through telephone calls. 7. COMPANY REPORT A. Update on Big Ten Network — Mr. Leupold reviewed Comcast's position with Big Ten Network's subscribership demands. Big Ten Network demands that Comcast place the channel on its expanded basic cable and Comcast wants to put it on their sports package. B. Community Involvement - Mr. Leupold reviewed Comcast and its employees' involvement in the community and encouraged the Commission to review Comcast's monthly newsletter. C. Comcast Correspondence — Comcast's correspondence from April 24, 2007 through October 11, 2007 was included in the agenda packet. M 8. NEXT MEETING DATE The next regular Full Commission meeting is Wednesday, April 23, 2008 at 4:00 p.m. at the Eden Prairie City Hall. 9. ADJOURNMENT At approximately 4:43 p.m. Mr. Neal moved and Mr. Devich seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting. Motion passed. 1167410v1 A-5